Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

 

          X    ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934   

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2014

OR

 

           ¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934   

Commission File No. 001-34084

POPULAR, INC.

Incorporated in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

IRS Employer Identification No. 66-0667416

Principal Executive Offices:

209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue

Hato Rey, Puerto Rico 00918

Telephone Number: (787) 765-9800

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

 

  Name of Each Exchange
Title of Each Class   on which Registered
Common Stock ($0.01 par value)   The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
6.70% Cumulative Monthly Income Trust Preferred Securities   The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
6.125% Cumulative Monthly Income Trust Preferred Securities   The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes X No ¨ .

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No X.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ¨ .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No ¨ .

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer X         Accelerated filer ¨                         Non-accelerated filer ¨                     Smaller reporting company ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No X

As of June 30, 2014, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by non-affiliates of Popular, Inc. was approximately $ 3,451,838,200 based upon the reported closing price of $34.18 on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date.

As of February 23, 2015, there were 103,640,031 shares of Popular, Inc.’s Common Stock outstanding.


Table of Contents

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

(1) Portions of Popular, Inc.’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”) are incorporated herein by reference in response to Item 1 of Part I, Items 5 through 8 of Part II and Item 15 (a)(1) of Part IV.

(2) Portions of Popular, Inc.’s definitive proxy statement relating to the 2015 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Popular, Inc. (the “Proxy Statement”) are incorporated herein by reference in response to Items 10 through 14 of Part III. The Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on or about March 24, 2015.

Forward-Looking Statements

The information included in this Form 10-K contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Those forward-looking statements may relate to Popular, Inc.’s (“Popular”, “we”, “us”, “our”) financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with respect to expected earnings levels, the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, delinquency trends, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes, capital markets conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, the anticipated impacts of our acquisition of certain assets and deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver, including transaction expenses and our expectation that the transaction will be accretive, and the effect of legal proceedings and new accounting standards on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “continues”, “expect”, “estimate”, “intend”, “project” and similar expressions and future or conditional verbs such as “will”, “would”, “should”, “could”, “might”, “can”, “may” or similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.

These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties, estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict.

Various factors, some of which are beyond Popular’s control, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference included, but are not limited to:

 

   

the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and economic conditions,

 

   

changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes;

 

   

the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies;

 

   

changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels of capital and the impact of proposed capital standards on our capital ratios;

 

   

the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank - Act”) on our businesses, business practices and cost of operations;

 

   

regulatory approvals that may be necessary to undertake certain actions or consummate strategic transactions such as acquisitions and dispositions;

 

   

the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are located;

 

   

the performance of the stock and bond markets;

 

   

competition in the financial services industry;

 

   

additional Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) assessments;

 

   

possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes.

 

2


Table of Contents

Other possible events or factors that could cause results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements include the following: negative economic conditions that adversely affect the housing prices, the job market, consumer confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs and provision expense; risks associated with maintaining customer relationships from our acquisition of certain assets and deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver, including managing any potential customer confusion caused by the alliance structure; changes in interest rates and market liquidity which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect our ability to originate and distribute financial products in the primary and secondary markets; changes in market rates and prices which may adversely impact the value of financial assets and liabilities; difficulties in converting or integrating the Doral branches or difficulties in providing transition support to alliance co-bidders; liabilities resulting from litigation and regulatory investigations; changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations; our ability to grow our core businesses; decisions to downsize, sell or close units or otherwise change our business mix; and management’s ability to identify and manage these and other risks. Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in “Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings”, is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of regulators, judges and juries.

All forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-K are based upon information available to Popular as of the date of this Form 10-K, and other than as required by law, including the requirements of applicable securities laws, we assume no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

 

3


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

         Page  

 

PART I

    
Item 1  

Business

     5   
Item 1A  

Risk Factors

     29   
Item 1B  

Unresolved Staff Comments

     44   
Item 2  

Properties

     44   
Item 3  

Legal Proceedings

     45   
Item 4  

Mine Safety Disclosures

     45   
PART II     
Item 5  

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

     45   
Item 6  

Selected Financial Data

     48   
Item 7  

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations

     49   
Item 7A  

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     49   
Item 8  

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     49   
Item 9  

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure

     49   
Item 9A  

Controls and Procedures

     49   
Item 9B  

Other Information

     50   
PART III     
Item 10  

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

     50   
Item 11  

Executive Compensation

     50   
Item 12  

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

     50   
Item 13  

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

     51   
Item 14  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

     51   
PART IV     
Item 15  

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

     51   
 

Signatures

     52   

 

4


Table of Contents

PART I POPULAR, INC.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

General

Popular is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company, registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHC Act”) and subject to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”). Popular was incorporated in 1984 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and is the largest financial institution based in Puerto Rico, with consolidated assets of $33.1 billion, total deposits of $24.8 billion and stockholders’ equity of $4.3 billion at December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2014, we ranked among the 50 largest U.S. banks based on total assets according to information gathered and disclosed by the Federal Reserve Board.

We operate in two principal markets:

•  Puerto Rico:  We provide retail, including residential mortgage loans originations, and commercial banking services through our principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“Banco Popular” or “BPPR”), as well as auto and equipment leasing and financing, investment banking, broker-dealer and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries.

•  Mainland United States:  We operate Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN, Inc. (“E-LOAN”). BPNA is a community bank providing a broad range of financial services and products to the communities it serves. BPNA operates branches in New York, New Jersey and Southern Florida, under the name of Popular Community Bank. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA.

Our two reportable business segments for accounting purposes, BPPR and BPNA, correspond to our Puerto Rico and mainland United States businesses, respectively. Following the sale in the third quarter of 2010 of a 51% ownership interest and subsequent sales of shares, as discussed below, of EVERTEC, Inc. (“EVERTEC”), our financial transaction processing and technology services business, we report our remaining 14.96% ownership interest in this business in our “Corporate” group, which also includes the holding company operations and certain other equity investments.

The sections that follow provide a description of significant transactions that have impacted or will impact our current and future operations.

Significant Transactions During 2014

Repayment of TARP Funds

On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury through the repurchase of $935 million of trust capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Corporation funded the repurchase through a combination of available cash and approximately $400 million from the proceeds of the issuance of its $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019, which settled on July 1, 2014.

On July 23, 2014, the Corporation also completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant initially issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in 2008 for a repurchase price of $3.0 million. The warrant represented the right to purchase 2,093,284 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $67 per share with an original term of 10 years. With the completion of this transaction, the Corporation completed its exit from the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

Reorganization of U.S. mainland operations

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of its California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations to three different buyers as part of an internal reorganization. In connection with these transactions, the

 

5


Table of Contents

Corporation is relocating certain back office operations to Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation recorded a net gain of $33.8 million, after customary transaction costs, as a result of these transactions. After the reorganization is complete, annual operating expenses are expected to decrease by approximately $35 million. This decrease in expenses is expected to offset a similar reduction in revenues that will result from the sale of the regional operations. The Corporation recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $186.5 million, related to the goodwill asset allocated to these regions. This non-cash charge had no impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios. The Corporation also executed other transactions as part of the reorganization of its U.S. operations. These included the refinancing of $638 million in structured repos, which resulted in increased margins, at a cost of approximately $39.8 million recognized during 2014. Also, the Corporation completed bulk sales or agreements to sell of non-performing and legacy assets with an aggregate book value of approximately $249 million, at a net loss of $11.1 million.

Impact of the amendment to the Internal Revenue Code approved by the Puerto Rico Government and other tax matters

On July 1, 2014, the Government of Puerto Rico approved an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code, which, among other things, changed the income tax rate for capital gains from 15% to 20%. As a result, the Corporation recognized an income tax expense of approximately $20.0 million during 2014, mainly related to the deferred tax liability associated with the portfolio acquired from Westernbank.

During the second quarter of 2014, the Corporation entered into a Closing Agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury. The Agreement, among other matters, was related to the income tax treatment of certain charge-offs related to the loans acquired from Westernbank as part of the FDIC assisted transaction in the year 2010. As a result of the Agreement, the Corporation recorded a tax benefit of $23.4 million due to a reduction in the deferred tax liability associated with the Westernbank loan portfolio. Additionally, in connection with this Closing, the Corporation made an estimated tax payment of $45 million which will be used as a credit to offset future income tax liabilities.

Puerto Rico Business

General.

We offer in Puerto Rico a variety of retail and commercial banking services through our principal bank subsidiary, BPPR. BPPR was organized in 1893 and is Puerto Rico’s largest bank with consolidated total assets of $27.1 billion, deposits of $21.5 billion and stockholder’s equity of $3.4 billion at December 31, 2014. BPPR accounted for 82% of our total consolidated assets at December 31, 2014. BPPR has the largest retail franchise in Puerto Rico, with 168 branches and 602 ATMs as of December 31, 2014. BPPR also operates eight branches in the U.S. Virgin Islands, one branch in the British Virgin Islands and one branch in New York. In the Virgin Islands, BPPR had 21 ATMs at the end of 2014. BPPR’s deposits are insured under the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).

Our Puerto Rico operations include those of Popular Auto, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of BPPR, a vehicle and equipment financing, leasing and daily rental company. The residential mortgages originations business is conducted by Popular Mortgage, a division of BPPR. In Puerto Rico, we also offer financial advisory, investment and securities brokerage services for institutional and retail customers through Popular Securities, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Popular. Popular Securities, LLC, is a securities broker-dealer with operations in Puerto Rico. As of December 31, 2014, Popular Securities had $209.2 million in total assets and $4.2 billion in assets under management. In addition, BPPR has various special purpose vehicles holding specific assets acquired in satisfaction of loans for real estate development projects and commercial loans.

We offer insurance and reinsurance services through Popular Insurance, LLC, a general insurance agency, and Popular Life RE, a reinsurance company, with total revenues of $27.0 million and $18.7 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2014. We also own Popular Risk Services, LLC, an insurance broker, and Popular Insurance V.I., Inc., an insurance agency operating in the Virgin Islands.

 

6


Table of Contents

Lending Activities.

Unless otherwise stated, all references in this Form 10-K to total loan portfolio, total credit exposure or loan portfolios, exclude covered loans, which represent loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC and non-covered loans held-for-sale. Loans held-for-sale in Puerto Rico amounted to $84 million at December 31, 2014.

We concentrate our lending activities in the following areas:

 

  (1)

Commercial .  Commercial loans are comprised of (i) commercial and industrial (C&I) loans to commercial customers for use in normal business operations, finance, working capital needs, equipment purchases or other projects, and (ii) commercial real estate (CRE) loans (excluding construction loans) for income producing real estate properties as well as owner occupied properties. C&I loans are underwritten individually and usually secured with the assets of the company and the personal guarantee of the business owners. CRE loans consist of loans for income producing real estate properties and real estate developers and the financing of owner-occupied facilities if there is real estate as collateral. We mitigate our risk on these loans by requiring collateral values that exceed the loan amount and underwriting the loan with cash flow sustainability that exceeds debt service requirements. Non-owner-occupied CRE loans are generally made to finance office and industrial buildings and retail shopping centers and are repaid through cash flows related to the operation, sale or refinancing of the property.

 

Total commercial loans in Puerto Rico were $6.4 billion as of December 31, 2014, and represented 40% of our total loan portfolio in Puerto Rico. For greater detail of the breakdown of our Commercial portfolio refer to the Table under the caption “Business Concentration” in this section.

 

  (2)

Construction .  Construction loans are CRE loans to companies or developers used for the construction of a commercial or residential property for which repayment will be generated by the sale or permanent financing of the property. Our construction loan portfolio primarily consists of retail, residential (land and condominiums), office and warehouse product types. These loans are generally underwritten and managed by a specialized real estate group that actively monitors the construction phase and manages the loan disbursements according to the predetermined construction schedule.

 

Total construction loans in Puerto Rico were $ 159.4 million as of December 31, 2014, and represented 1% of our total loan portfolio in Puerto Rico. BPPR is currently originating a limited amount of new construction loans.

 

  (3)

Lease Financings .  Lease financings are primarily comprised of automobile loans/leases made through automotive dealerships and equipment lease financings.

 

Total lease financings in Puerto Rico were $ 564.4 million as of December 31, 2014, and represented 4% of our total loan portfolio in Puerto Rico.

 

  (4)

Residential Mortgage .  Mortgage loans include residential mortgage loans to consumers for the purchase or refinancing of a residence and also include residential construction loans made to individuals for the construction or refurbishment of their residence. The majority of these loans are financed over a 15 to 30 year term, and in most cases, the loans are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence. In some cases, government agencies or private mortgage insurers guarantee the loan. Our general practice is to sell a significant majority of our fixed-rate originations in the secondary mortgage market.

 

Total mortgage loans in Puerto Rico were $ 5.5 billion as of December 31, 2014, and represented 34% of our total loan portfolio in Puerto Rico.

 

7


Table of Contents
  (5)

Consumer .   Consumer loans include personal loans, credit cards, home equity lines of credit (“HELOCs”) and other loans made by banks to individual borrowers. In this area, BPPR offers four unsecured products: personal loans, credit cards, personal credit lines and overdraft protection. All other consumer loans are secured. HELOCs include both home equity loans and lines of credit secured by a first or second mortgage on the borrower’s residence, which allows customers to borrow against the equity in their homes. Real estate market values as of the time HELOCs are granted directly affect the amount of credit extended and, in addition, changes in these values impact our exposure to losses in this type of loan.

 

 

    

Total consumer loans in Puerto Rico were $ 3.4 billion as of December 31, 2014, and represented 21% of our total loan portfolio in Puerto Rico.

 

Covered Loans.

We refer to the loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except credit cards, as “covered loans”, as BPPR is entitled to be reimbursed by the FDIC for a substantial portion of any future losses on such loans under the terms of the loss sharing agreements. Foreclosed other real estate properties are also covered under the loss sharing agreements. Pursuant to the terms of the loss sharing agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to assets covered by such agreements (the “covered assets”) begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. On a combined basis, the FDIC will reimburse BPPR for 80% of all qualifying losses with respect to the covered assets during the covered period. BPPR will reimburse the FDIC for 80% of qualifying recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC reimbursed BPPR. The loss sharing agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for ten years (ending on April 30, 2020), and the loss sharing agreement applicable to commercial and other assets provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for five years (ending on April 30, 2015), with additional recovery sharing for three years thereafter.

Because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC, the risks of the covered loans are significantly different from other loans in our portfolio, thus we have determined to segregate them in our financial statements and in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Covered loans are reported in loans exclusive of the estimated FDIC loss share indemnification asset.

At December 31, 2014, covered loans totaled $2.5 billion or 8% of total consolidated assets of Popular.

True-up payment obligation to the FDIC

BPPR agreed to make a true-up payment obligation (the “true-up payment”) to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day (the “true-up measurement date”) of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true-up payment obligation is recorded as contingent consideration, which is included in the caption of other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Under the loss sharing agreements, BPPR will pay to the FDIC 50% of the excess, if any, of: (i) 20% of the intrinsic loss estimate of $4.6 billion (or $925 million) (as determined by the FDIC) less (ii) the sum of: (A) 25% of the asset discount (per bid) ($1.1 billion)); plus (B) 25% of the cumulative shared loss payments (defined as the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to BPPR minus the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the FDIC); plus (C) the sum of the period servicing amounts for every consecutive twelve month period prior to and ending on the true-up measurement date in respect of each of the loss sharing agreements during which the loss sharing provisions of the applicable loss sharing agreement is in effect (defined as the product of the simple average of the principal amount of shared loss loans and shared loss assets at the beginning and end of such period times 1%). At December 31, 2014, the carrying amount of the true-up payment obligation amounted to $129 million.

 

8


Table of Contents

Mainland United States Business

General.

Popular North America, Inc. (“PNA”) functions as the holding company for our operations in the mainland United States. PNA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Popular, was organized in 1991 under the laws of the State of Delaware and is a registered bank holding company under the BHC Act. As of December 31, 2014, PNA had one principal subsidiary which was BPNA, a full service commercial bank incorporated in the state of New York.

The banking operations of BPNA in the United States mainland are based in three states and are conducted under the name of Popular Community Bank. As discussed above, during 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of its California, Illinois and Central Florida operations. The following table contains information of BPNA’s operations:

 

State    Branches    ATMs   

Aggregate Assets

($ in billions)

  

Total Deposits

($ in billions)

New York

   31    61    $2.40    $1.95

Florida

   10    11    2.28    1.22

New Jersey

   6    8    0.11    0.28

In addition, BPNA owns all of the outstanding stock of E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc., and Popular Insurance Agency USA, Inc. E-LOAN’s business currently consists solely of providing an online platform to raise deposits for BPNA. E-LOAN also holds a portfolio of loans from its discontinued lending activities. At December 31, 2014, E-LOAN’s total assets amounted to $255.8 million. Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. sold a substantial portion of its lease financing portfolio during the quarter ended March 31, 2009 and also ceased originations as part of the BPNA restructuring plan implemented in late 2008. As a result of these initiatives, the total assets of Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. were reduced to $13.2 million at December 31, 2014. Popular Insurance Agency USA, Inc. acts as an insurance agent or broker offering insurance and investment products across the BPNA branch network. Total revenues of Popular Insurance Agency USA, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $5.8 million.

Lending Activities.

We concentrate our lending activities in the mainland US in the following areas:

 

  (1)

Commercial .   Commercial loans are comprised of (i) commercial and industrial (C&I) loans to commercial customers for use in normal business operations to finance working capital needs, equipment purchases or other projects, and (ii) commercial real estate (CRE) loans (excluding construction loans) for income producing real estate properties as well as owner-occupied properties. C&I loans are underwritten individually and usually secured with the assets of the company and the personal guarantee of the business owners. CRE loans consist of loans for income-producing real estate properties and real estate developers and the financing of owner-occupied facilities if there is real estate as collateral. We mitigate our risk on these loans by requiring collateral values that exceed the loan amount and underwriting the loan with cash flow sustainability that exceeds debt service requirements. Non owner-occupied CRE loans are generally made to finance office and industrial buildings and retail shopping centers and are repaid through cash flows related to the operation, sale or refinancing of the property.

 

 

    

Total commercial loans at BPNA were $ 1.8 billion as of December 31, 2014, and represented 51% of our total loan portfolio in the U.S.

 

  (2)

Construction .   Construction loans are CRE loans to companies or developers used for the construction of a commercial or residential property for which repayment will be generated by the sale or permanent financing of the property. Our construction loan portfolio primarily consists of retail, residential (land and condominiums), office and warehouse product types. These loans are generally underwritten and managed by a specialized real estate group that actively monitors the construction phase and manages the loan disbursements according to the predetermined construction schedule.

 

 

9


Table of Contents
    

Total construction loans at BPNA were $ 92.4 million as of December 31, 2014, and represented 3% of our total loan portfolio in the U.S.

 

  (3)

Legacy .   The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at BPNA.

 

    

Total legacy portfolio at BPNA was $ 80.8 million as of December 31, 2014, and represented 2% of our total loan portfolio in the U.S.

 

  (4)

Mortgage .   Mortgage loans include residential mortgage loans to consumers for the purchase or refinancing of a residence and also include residential construction loans made to individuals for the construction or refurbishment of their residence. The majority of these loans are financed over a 15 to 30 year term, and in most cases, the loans are extended to borrowers to finance their primary residence. In some cases, government agencies or private mortgage insurers guarantee the loan. Our general practice is to sell a significant majority of our fixed-rate originations in the secondary market.

 

 

    

In response to economic conditions, we exited the origination of non-conventional mortgage loans in the U.S. mainland during 2008.

 

    

Total mortgage loans at BPNA were $ 1.1 billion as of December 31, 2014, and represented 30 % of our total loan portfolio in the U.S.

 

  (5)

Consumer .   Consumer loans include personal loans, credit cards, auto loans, HELOCs and other loans made by banks to individual borrowers. In this area, BPNA offers four unsecured products: personal loans, credit cards, personal credit lines and overdraft protection. All other consumer loans are secured.

 

 

    

As a result of our restructuring of the E-LOAN operations in prior years, consumer loans continue to decrease as the remaining closed-end second mortgages and HELOCs originated through the E-LOAN platform continue to be resolved, in addition to a reduction in the loan origination activity since E-LOAN no longer operates as a direct lender.

 

 

     Total consumer loans at BPNA were $481.2 million as of December 31, 2014, and represented 14% of our total loan portfolio in the U.S.

Credit Administration and Credit Policies

Interest from our loan portfolios is our principal source of revenue. Whenever we make loans, we expose ourselves to credit risk. At December 31, 2014, our credit exposure was centered in our $ 19.4 billion non-covered loan portfolio which represented 66% of our earning assets excluding covered loans. Credit risk is controlled and monitored through active asset quality management, including the use of lending standards, thorough review of potential borrowers and active asset quality administration.

Business activities that expose us to credit risk are managed within the Board’s Risk Management policy, and the Credit Risk Tolerance Limits policy which establishes limits that consider factors such as maintaining a prudent balance of risk-taking across diversified risk types and business units, compliance with regulatory guidance, controlling the exposure to lower credit quality assets, and limiting growth in, and overall exposure to, any product or risk segment where we do not have sufficient experience and a proven ability to predict credit losses.

 

10


Table of Contents

Our Credit Strategy Committee (“CRESCO”) is management’s top policy-making body with respect to credit-related matters and credit strategies. CRESCO reviews the activities of each subsidiary to ensure a proactive and coordinated management of credit granting, credit exposures and credit procedures. CRESCO’s principal functions include reviewing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and periodically approving appropriate provisions, monitoring compliance with charge-off policy, establishing portfolio diversification, yield and quality standards, establishing credit exposure reporting standards, monitoring asset quality, and approving credit policies and amendments thereto for the subsidiaries and/or business lines, including special lending approval authorities when and if appropriate. The analysis of the allowance adequacy is presented to the Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors for review, consideration and ratification on a quarterly basis.

We also have a Corporate Credit Risk Management Division (“CCRMD”). The CCRMD is a centralized unit, independent of the lending function. The CCRMD’s functions include identifying, measuring and controlling credit risk independently from the business units, evaluating the credit risk rating system and reviewing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and regulatory standards. The CCRMD also ensures that the subsidiaries comply with the credit policies and applicable regulations, and monitors credit underwriting standards. Also, the CCRMD performs ongoing monitoring of the portfolio, including potential areas of concern for specific borrowers and/or geographic regions.

We have a Credit Process Review Group within the CCRMD, which performs annual comprehensive credit process reviews of several commercial, construction, consumer and mortgage lending groups in BPPR. This group evaluates the credit risk profile of each originating unit along with each unit’s credit administration effectiveness, including the assessment of the risk rating representative of the current credit quality of commercial and construction loans and the evaluation of collateral documentation. The monitoring performed by this group contributes to assess compliance with credit policies and underwriting standards, determine the current level of credit risk, evaluate the effectiveness of the credit management process and identify control deficiencies that may arise in the credit- granting process. Based on its findings, the Credit Process Review Group recommends corrective actions, if necessary, that help in maintaining a sound credit process. In the U.S. mainland, the Credit Process Review Group evaluates the consumer and mortgage lending groups. CCRMD has contracted an outside loan review firm to perform the credit process reviews for the commercial and construction loan portfolios in the U.S. mainland operations. The CCRMD participates in defining the review plan with the outside loan review firm and actively participates in the discussions of the results of the loan reviews with the business units. The CCRMD may periodically review the work performed by the outside loan review firm. The CCRMD reports the results of the credit process reviews to the Credit Strategy Committee and the Risk Management Committee of our Board of Directors.

We maintain comprehensive credit policies for all lines of business in order to mitigate credit risk. Our credit policies are ratified by our Board of Directors and set forth, among other things, underwriting standards and procedures for monitoring and evaluating loan portfolio quality. Our credit policies also require prompt identification and quantification of asset quality deterioration or potential loss in order to ensure the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Included in these policies, primarily determined by the amount, type of loan and risk characteristics of the credit facility, are various approval levels and lending limit constraints, ranging from the branch or department level to those that are more centralized.

Our credit policies and procedures establish strict documentation requirements for each loan and related collateral type, when applicable, during the underwriting, closing and monitoring phases. During the initial loan underwriting process, the credit policies require, at a minimum, historical financial statements or tax returns of the borrower and any guarantor, an analysis of financial information contained in a credit approval package, a risk rating determination in the case of commercial and construction loans, reports from credit agencies and appraisals for real estate-related loans. We currently do not make “no doc” or “stated income” loans where there is no income or asset verification by the lender. The credit policies also set forth the required closing documentation depending on the loan and the collateral type.

Although we originate most of our loans internally in both the Puerto Rico and mainland United States markets, we occasionally purchase or participate in loans originated by other financial institutions. When we purchase or participate in loans originated by others, we conduct the same underwriting analysis of the borrowers and apply the same criteria as we do for loans originated by us. This also includes a review of the applicable legal documentation.

 

11


Table of Contents

Set forth below are the general parameters under which we analyze our major loan categories:

Commercial and Construction :   Commercial and construction loans are underwritten using a comprehensive analysis of the borrower’s operations, including the borrower’s business model, management, financial statements, pro-forma financial condition including financial projections, use of funds, debt service capacity, leverage and the financial strength of any guarantor. Most of our commercial and construction loans are secured by real estate and other collateral. A review of the quality and value of collateral, including independent third-party appraisals of machinery and equipment and commercial real estate, as appropriate, is also conducted. Physical inspection of the collateral and audits of receivables is conducted when appropriate. Our credit policies provide maximum loan-to-value ratios that limit the size of a loan to a maximum percentage of the value of the real estate collateral securing the loan. The loan-to-value percentage varies by the type of collateral. Our loan-to value limitations are, in certain cases, determined by other risk factors such as the financial strength of the borrower or guarantor, the equity provided to the project and the viability of the project itself. Most CRE loans are originated with full recourse or limited recourse to all principals and owners. Non-recourse lending is limited to borrowers with very solid financial capacity.

As of December 31, 2014, $ 3.7 billion, or 57%, of our commercial and construction loans in Puerto Rico were secured by real estate, while in the mainland United States these figures totaled $ 1.2 billion, or 65%, respectively.

Consumer, Mortgage and Lease Financings:    Our consumer, mortgage and lease financings are originated consistent with the underwriting approach described above, but also include an assessment of each borrower’s personal financial condition, including verification of income, assets and FICO score. Credit reports are obtained and reconciled with the financial statements provided to us. Although a standard industry definition for subprime loans does not exist, for risk assessment purposes, subprime consumer and mortgage loans in the BPPR segment are determined based on the final rule definition of higher risk consumer loans issued by the FDIC which was made effective during 2014. A higher-risk consumer loan is defined as a loan where, as of origination, or as of refinance, the probability of default (PD) within two years is greater than 20%. In Puerto Rico, as of December 31, 2014, consumer and mortgage loans with subprime characteristics consisted of $248.1 million (7% of the Puerto Rico consumer loan portfolio) and $803.4 million (15% of the Puerto Rico mortgage loan portfolio), respectively. Since the final rule definition is not applicable to our US operation, subprime loans in the BPNA segment are defined as borrowers with one or a combination of certain credit risk factors, such as FICO scores (generally less than 620 for secured products and 660 for unsecured products), high debt to income ratios (higher than 50%) and inferior payment history, including factors such as defaults and limited credit history. As of December 31, 2014, our mainland United States consumer and mortgage loans with subprime characteristics consisted of $48.5 million (or 10% of the U.S. mainland consumer loan portfolio) and $375.1 million (or 36% of U.S. mainland mortgage loans portfolio). As part of the restructuring in 2008 of our U.S. mainland operations, we discontinued originating loans with subprime characteristics in those operations, including the U.S. non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio and E-LOAN. Popular does not target subprime borrowers and does not offer products specifically designed for subprime borrowers.

As of December 31, 2014, there was a nominal amount of interest-only loans in our consumer loans portfolio and $105.6 million of interest-only loans in our mortgage loan portfolio, all of which were at BPPR. Also, we did not have any adjustable rate mortgage loans in our Puerto Rico portfolio. In Puerto Rico, we offer a special step loan mortgage product to purchasers of units within construction projects financed by BPPR. This product, with a term of up to 40 years, provides for 100% financing at a 2.99% interest rate for the first five years of the term of the loan and 5.88% fixed-rate for the remaining term. Consistent with our credit policies, the underwriting and loan approval process for our step loan mortgage product is based on a number of factors, including an assessment of each borrower’s personal financial condition (including verification of income, assets and FICO score), as well as debt-to-equity ratio, reserves, loan-to-value and prior mortgage experience. While Popular has not established specific limits for FICO scores, debt-to-income ratios and loan-to-values applicable to this product, the underwriting parameters applied to this product are generally similar to the standards used for the underwriting of our non-conforming loans, except for higher loan-to-value ratios (90% or higher). As of December 31, 2014, Popular had $414.2 million of these step loans.

As of December 31, 2014, $5.5 billion, or 62%, of our total consumer loans in Puerto Rico were secured by real estate, including mortgage loans. In the United States mainland, these figures totaled $ 1.1 billion, or 69%, respectively. Lease financings are also secured by the underlying asset.

 

12


Table of Contents

Loan extensions, renewals and restructurings

Loans with satisfactory credit profiles can be extended, renewed or restructured. Many commercial loan facilities are structured as lines of credit, which are mainly one year in term and therefore are required to be renewed annually. Other facilities may be restructured or extended from time to time based upon changes in the borrower’s business needs, use of funds, timing of completion of projects and other factors. If the borrower is not deemed to have financial difficulties, extensions, renewals and restructurings are done in the normal course of business and not considered concessions, and the loans continue to be recorded as performing.

We evaluate various factors in order to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulties. Indicators that the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties include, for example: (i) the borrower is currently in default on any of its debt or it is probable that the borrower would be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification; (ii) the borrower has declared or is in the process of declaring bankruptcy; (iii) there is significant doubt as to whether the borrower will continue to be a going concern; (iv) currently, the borrower has securities that have been delisted, are in the process of being delisted, or are under threat of being delisted from an exchange; and (v) based on estimates and projections that only encompass the current business capabilities, the borrower forecasts that its entity-specific cash flows will be insufficient to service the debt (both interest and principal) in accordance with the contractual terms of the existing agreement through maturity; and absent the current modification, the borrower cannot obtain funds from sources other than the existing creditors at an effective interest rate equal to the current market interest rate for similar debt for a non-troubled debtor.

We have specialized workout officers who handle substantially all commercial loans that are past due 90 days and over, borrowers experiencing financial difficulties, and those that are considered problem loans based on their risk profile. As a general policy, we do not advance additional money to borrowers that are 90 days past due or over. In commercial and construction loans, certain exceptions may be approved under certain circumstances, including (i) when past due status is administrative in nature, such as expiration of a loan facility before the new documentation is executed, and not as a result of payment or credit issues; (ii) to improve our collateral position or otherwise maximize recovery or mitigate potential future losses; and (iii) with respect to certain entities that, although related through common ownership, are not cross defaulted nor cross-collateralized and are performing satisfactorily under their respective loan facilities. Such advances are underwritten following our credit policy guidelines and approved up to prescribed policy limits, which are dependent on the borrower’s financial condition, collateral and guarantee, among others.

In addition to the legal lending limit established under applicable state banking law, discussed in detail below, business activities that expose the Corporation to credit risk should be managed within guidelines described in the Credit Risk Tolerance Limits policy. Limits are defined for loss and credit performance metrics, portfolio composition and concentration, and industry and name-level, which monitors lending concentration to a single borrower or a group of related borrower, including specific lending limits based on industry or other criteria, such as a percentage of the banks’ capital.

Loans to borrowers with financial difficulties can be modified as a loss mitigation alternative. New terms and conditions of these loans are individually evaluated to determine a feasible loan restructuring. In many consumer and mortgage loans, a trial period is established where the borrower has to comply with three consecutive monthly payments under the new terms before implementing the new structure. Loans that are restructured, renewed or extended due to financial difficulties and the terms reflect concessions that would not otherwise be granted are considered as Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”). These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. These concessions stem from an agreement between the creditor and the debtor or are imposed by law or a court. TDRs also include loans for which the Corporation has entered into liquidation proceedings with borrowers in which neither principal or interest is forgiven, but the Corporation accepts payments which are different than the contractual payment schedule. Refer to additional information on TDRs on Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

13


Table of Contents

Loans classified as TDRs are reported in non-accrual status if the loan was in non-accruing status at the time of the modification. The TDR loan will continue in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (at least six months of sustained performance after classified as TDR and management has concluded whether it is probable that the borrower would not be in payment default in a foreseeable future). If the loan was appropriately on accrual status prior to the restructuring, the borrower has demonstrated performance under the previous terms (for a period of at least six months, as defined), and the bank’s credit evaluation shows the borrower’s capacity to continue to perform under the restructured terms (both principal and interest payments), it is likely that the appropriate conclusion is for the loan to remain on accrual at the time of the restructuring. Loans classified as TDRs are excluded from TDR status if performance under the restructured terms exists for a reasonable period (at least twelve months of sustained performance after being classified) and the loan yields a market rate.

Business Concentration

Since our business activities are currently concentrated primarily in Puerto Rico, our results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon the general trends of the Puerto Rico economy and, in particular, the residential and commercial real estate markets. The concentration of our operations in Puerto Rico exposes us to greater risk than other banking companies with a wider geographic base. Our asset and revenue composition by geographical area is presented in “Financial Information about Geographic Areas” below and in Note 45, “Segment Reporting”, to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report.

Our loan portfolio is diversified by loan category. However, approximately 61% of our non-covered loan portfolio at December 31, 2014 consisted of real estate-related loans, including residential mortgage loans, construction loans and commercial loans secured by commercial real estate. The table below presents the distribution of our non-covered loan portfolio by loan category at December 31, 2014. “Legacy” refers to loans remaining from lines of businesses we exited as a result of the restructuring of our U.S. operations in 2008 and 2009.

Loan category (non-covered)

(dollars in millions)

 

                                                                                               
      BPPR      %      BPNA      %          POPULAR          %  

C&I

         $ 2,808        18                $ 646        19                $ 3,454        18   

CRE

     3,567        22        1,114        32        4,681        24   

Construction

     159        1        92        3        251        1  

Legacy

     -        -        81        2        81         

Leases

     564        4        -        -        564         

Consumer

     3,389        21        481        14        3,870        20   

Mortgage

     5,451        34        1,052        30        6,503        34   

Total

         $ 15,938        100                $ 3,466        100                $ 19,404        100   

Except for the Corporation’s exposure to the Puerto Rico Government sector, no individual or single group of related accounts is considered material in relation to our total assets or deposits, or in relation to our overall business. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and its instrumentalities and municipalities amounted to $ 1.0 billion, of which approximately $ 811 million is outstanding ($1.2 billion and $950 million at December 31, 2013). Of the amount outstanding, $ 689 million consists of loans and $ 122 million are securities ($789 million and $161 million at December 31, 2013). Of this amount, $ 336 million represents obligations from the Government of Puerto Rico and public corporations that are either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment ($527 million at December 31, 2013). Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as public utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The remaining $ 475 million represents obligations from various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment ($423 million at December 31, 2013). These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. These loans have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality.

 

14


Table of Contents

In addition, at December 31, 2014, the Corporation had $370 million in indirect exposure to loans or securities that are payable by non-governmental entities, but which carry a government guarantee to cover any shortfall in collateral in the event of borrower default ($360 million at December 31, 2013). These included $289 million in residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (December 31, 2013 - $274 million). These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. Also, the Corporation had $49 million in Puerto Rico pass-through housing bonds backed by FNMA, GNMA or residential loans CMO’s, and $32 million of industrial development notes ($52 million and $34 million at December 31, 2013).

For further discussion of our loan portfolio and geographical concentration, see “Financial Condition — Loans” and “Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality-Geographical and Government Risk” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of the Annual Report.

Evolution of Business during the Financial Crisis

We have taken significant steps during the past years to counter the effect of the broad economic slowdown in the United States and the prolonged economic recession in Puerto Rico, our principal market, where the economy entered into recession in the second quarter of 2006. In 2008, we participated in the TARP Capital Purchase Program in order to strengthen our capital and liquidity position. In December 2008, we received $935 million from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“U.S. Treasury”) as part of the TARP Capital Purchase Program in exchange for senior Perpetual Preferred Stock and a warrant to purchase 2,093,283 shares of our Common Stock at an exercise price of $67 per share (adjusted to reflect the 1-for-10 reverse stock split effective on May 29, 2012). The shares of Preferred Stock qualified as Tier 1 regulatory capital and paid cumulative dividends quarterly at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter.

The TARP Capital Purchase Program gave us the opportunity to raise capital quickly and improve our liquidity position, at a low cost, with limited shareholder dilution, at a time when the unprecedented market instability made it difficult, if not impossible, for us to raise capital. We used proceeds from the TARP, together with other available moneys, to make capital contributions and loans to our banking subsidiaries to ensure they remain well-capitalized, and strengthen their ability to continue creditworthy lending in our home markets.

In August 2009, we completed an exchange offer in order to increase our common equity capital to accommodate the more adverse economic and credit scenarios assumed under the Supervisory Capital Assessment Program (the “SCAP”), as applied to regional banking institutions. With the exchange offer we issued 35.7 million new shares of Common Stock in exchange for previously issued trust preferred securities and shares of preferred stock, and increased our Tier 1 common equity by $1.4 billion.

In connection with the public exchange offer, we agreed with the U.S. Treasury to exchange the $935 million senior perpetual preferred stock issued to it pursuant to the TARP Capital Purchase Program for $935 million of newly issued perpetual trust preferred securities, with the same distribution rate as that of the Preferred Stock. This exchange was completed in August 2009. The trust preferred securities had a distribution rate of 5% until December 5, 2013 and 9% thereafter.

In addition to our participation in the TARP Capital Purchase Program and the completion of the exchange offer, during 2008 and 2009, we carried out various restructurings plans for our operations in the U.S. mainland to improve our U.S. operations, address credit quality, contain controllable costs, maintain well capitalized ratios and improve capital and liquidity positions. Most of these plans were successfully completed at the end of 2009.

During 2010, the Corporation enhanced its capital position with an equity offering in which it raised $1.15 billion of new common equity capital. This capital raise, along with the after-tax gain of $531.0 million, net of transaction costs, on the sale of a 51% interest in EVERTEC, substantially strengthened the Corporation’s capital ratios, placing it in a position to participate in the consolidation of the Puerto Rico banking market and to pursue strategies to improve the credit quality of its loan portfolio. On April 30, 2010, BPPR acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Westernbank from the FDIC in an assisted transaction.

 

15


Table of Contents

We have also carried out a series of actions to improve our Puerto Rico operations, credit quality and profitability. During 2009, we implemented cost-cutting measures such as the reduction in hiring and pension plan freezes and the suspension of matching contributions to retirement plans. During 2011, further steps were taken to improve our profitability, including the implementation of a voluntary employee retirement window at the end of 2011. As a result of this initiative in December 2011, we recorded $15.6 million in pension costs related to 369 employees that were eligible and elected to participate in the retirement program. The retirement was effective on January 31, 2012. Also, during 2011 the Corporation executed sales of $457 million (unpaid principal balance) non-performing mortgage loans at BPNA and $358 million in unpaid principal balance of construction and commercial real estate loans at BPPR as part of its de-risking strategy.

We have continued to look for synergies and efficiencies within our operations. On December 2012, Popular Mortgage, Inc. was merged into Banco Popular. This consolidation, among other things, resulted in cost savings for the Corporation. For the year 2013, FDIC deposit insurance expense was $25.2 million lower than for 2012, including a credit of $11.3 million received during the first quarter.

During 2013, the Corporation continued to look for opportunities to strengthen its capital structure and de-risk its balance sheet. The Corporation monetized part of its investment in EVERTEC by participating as a selling stockholder in EVERTEC’s public offerings. The Corporation recorded an after tax gain of $413 million as a result of these transactions, as discussed above. BPPR completed sales of assets with a book value of $944 million, most of which were in non-performing status. Coupled with loss mitigation strategies and aggressive resolution of non-performing loans, the Corporation was able to reduce its non-performing assets, excluding covered assets, by $1.1 billion from December 31, 2012.

For the year 2014, the FDIC deposit insurance expense was $16.4 million lower than for 2013. This reduction was also attributed to a lower volume of higher risk assets, after completion of the non-performing assets sales during the year 2013 and other efforts implemented by management.

On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury through the repurchase of $935 million of trust capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Corporation funded the repurchase through a combination of available cash and approximately $400 million from the proceeds of the issuance of its $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019, which settled on July 1, 2014.

On July 23, 2014, the Corporation also completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant initially issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in 2008 for a repurchase price of $3.0 million. With the completion of this transaction, the Corporation completed its exit from the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of its California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations to three different buyers as part of an internal reorganization. In connection with these transactions, the Corporation is relocating certain back office operations to Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation recorded a net gain of $33.8 million, after customary transaction costs, as a result of these transactions. After the reorganization is complete, annual operating expenses are expected to decrease by approximately $35 million. This decrease in expenses is expected to offset a similar reduction in revenues that will result from the sale of the regional operations. The Corporation also executed other transactions as part of the reorganization of its U.S. operations. The Corporation refinanced $638 million in structured repos, which resulted in increased margins, at a cost of approximately $39.8 million recognized during 2014. Also, the Corporation completed bulk sales or agreements to sell of non-performing and legacy assets with an aggregate book value of approximately $249 million, at a net loss of $11.1 million. The Corporation recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $186.5 million, related to the goodwill asset allocated to these regions. This non-cash charge had no impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios.

Competition

The financial services industry in which we operate is highly competitive. In Puerto Rico, our primary market, the banking business is highly competitive with respect to originating loans, acquiring deposits and providing other banking services. Most of our direct competition for our products and services comes from commercial banks. The principal competitors for BPPR include locally based commercial banks and a few large U.S. and foreign banks with assets up to

 

16


Table of Contents

approximately $10 billion as of December 31, 2014. On April 30, 2010, the FDIC closed three commercial banks and entered into loss-share purchase and assumption agreements with three other commercial banks with operations in Puerto Rico, including us with respect to Westernbank Puerto Rico. Those transactions involved the acquisition of most of the assets and liabilities of the closed banks, including the assumption of all of the non-brokered deposits. While these transactions have reduced the number of banking competitors in Puerto Rico, they have allowed some of our competitors to gain greater resources, such as a broader range of products and services. On December 18, 2012, there was another banking consolidation in Puerto Rico when Oriental Financial Group, a locally based financial institution, acquired the Puerto Rico operations of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria S.A. (BBVA), a foreign bank. As of December 31, 2014, there were 9 commercial banks operating in Puerto Rico.

We also compete with specialized players in the local financial industry that are not subject to the same regulatory restrictions as domestic banks and bank holding companies. Those competitors include brokerage houses, mortgage companies, insurance companies, credit unions (locally known as “cooperativas”), credit card companies, consumer finance companies, institutional lenders and other financial and non-financial institutions and entities. Credit unions generally provide basic consumer financial services. These competitors collectively represent a significant portion of the market and have lower cost structure and fewer regulatory constraints.

In the United States, our competition is primarily from community banks operating in our footprint and national banking institutions. Those include institutions with much more resources than we have that can exert substantial competitive pressure.

In both Puerto Rico and the United States, the primary factors in competing for business include pricing, convenience of branch locations and other delivery methods, range of products offered, and the level of service delivered. We must compete effectively along all these parameters to be successful. We may experience pricing pressure as some of our competitors seek to increase market share by reducing prices. Competition is particularly acute in the market for deposits, where pricing is very aggressive. Increased competition could require that we increase the rates offered on deposits or lower the rates charged on loans, which could adversely affect our profitability.

Economic factors, along with legislative and technological changes, will have an ongoing impact on the competitive environment within the financial services industry. We work to anticipate and adapt to dynamic competitive conditions whether it may be developing and marketing innovative products and services, adopting or developing new technologies that differentiate our products and services, cross-marketing, or providing personalized banking services. We strive to distinguish ourselves from other community banks and financial services providers in our marketplace by providing a high level of service to enhance customer loyalty and to attract and retain business. However, we can provide no assurance as to the effectiveness of these efforts on our future business or results of operations, as to our continued ability to anticipate and adapt to changing conditions, and as to sufficiently improving our services and/or banking products in order to successfully compete in our primary service areas.

Employees

At December 31, 2014, we employed 7,752 full time equivalent employees of which 6,811 were located in Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands and 941 in the U.S. mainland. None of our employees is represented by a collective bargaining group.

Financial Information About Segments

Our corporate structure consists of two reportable segments — BPPR and BPNA. A “Corporate” group has been defined to support the reportable segments. On September 30, 2010, the Corporation completed the sale of a 51% ownership interest in EVERTEC, which included the merchant acquiring business of BPPR. During the year 2013, the Corporation sold additional shares in connection with EVERTEC’s public offerings. Revenue from the remaining 14.96% ownership interest in EVERTEC is reported as non-interest income in the Corporate group.

Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on the products and services offered by the segments.

 

17


Table of Contents

For further information about our segments, see “Reportable Segment Results” in the Management Discussion and Analysis section of the Annual Report and Note 45, “Segment Reporting” to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report.

About Financial Information About Geographic Areas

Our revenue composition by geographical area is presented in Note 45, “Segment Reporting” to the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report.

The following table presents our long-lived assets by geographical area, other than financial instruments, long-term customer relationships, mortgage and other servicing rights and deferred tax assets. Long-lived assets located in foreign countries represent the investments under the equity method in the Dominican Republic.

 

Long-lived assets    2014      2013      2012  
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Puerto Rico

        

Premises and equipment

     $ 459,167      $ 458,915      $ 471,821  

Goodwill

     250,110        245,680        245,680  

Other intangible assets

     19,227        24,646        30,070  

Investments under the equity method

     102,861        98,323        156,305  
  

 

 

 
     $     831,365      $ 827,564      $ 903,876  
  

 

 

 

United States

        

Premises and equipment

     35,414        60,601        63,972  

Goodwill

     215,566        402,077        402,077  

Other intangible assets

     5,560        7,643        10,364  

Investments under the equity method

     14,834        14,850        11,395  
  

 

 

 
     $ 271,374      $     485,171      $     487,808  
  

 

 

 

Foreign Countries

        

Investments under the equity method

     $ 107,930      $ 83,833      $ 79,076  
  

 

 

 
     $ 107,930      $ 83,833      $ 79,076  
  

 

 

 

Regulation and Supervision

Described below are the material elements of selected laws and regulations applicable to Popular, PNA and their respective subsidiaries. Such laws and regulations are continually under review by Congress and state legislatures and federal and state regulatory agencies. Any change in the laws and regulations applicable to Popular and its subsidiaries could have a material effect on the business of Popular and its subsidiaries.

General

Popular and PNA are bank holding companies subject to consolidated supervision and regulation by the Federal Reserve Board under the BHC Act. BPPR and BPNA are subject to supervision and examination by applicable federal and state banking agencies including, in the case of BPPR, the Federal Reserve Board and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico (the “Office of the Commissioner”), and in the case of BPNA, the Federal Reserve Board and the New York State Department of Financial Services.

On December 20, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board issued for public comment a notice of proposed rulemaking under Title I of the Dodd-Frank Act, which we refer to as the “Proposed SIFI Rules”, establishing enhanced prudential standards for

 

   

Risk-based capital requirements and leverage limits;

 

   

Stress testing of capital;

 

18


Table of Contents
   

Liquidity requirements;

 

   

Overall risk management requirements;

 

   

Resolution plan (so-called “living wills”) and credit exposure reporting; and

 

   

Concentration/credit exposure limits.

The Proposed SIFI Rules address a wide, diverse array of regulatory areas, each of which is highly complex. In some cases they would implement financial regulatory requirements being proposed for the first time (for example, an enterprise-wide limit on exposures to any one counterparty and certain of its affiliates established at 25% of the capital and surplus of the covered company) and others that overlap with other regulatory reforms (for example, the Basel III capital and liquidity reforms discussed below in this section). The Proposed SIFI Rules also address the Dodd-Frank Act’s early remediation requirements applicable to bank holding companies that have total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more. The proposed remediation rules are modeled after the prompt corrective action regime, described below, but are designed to require action beginning in the earlier stages of a company’s financial distress by mandating action on the basis of arranged triggers, including capital and leverage, stress test results, liquidity and risk management.

In October 2012, the Federal Reserve Board issued final rules implementing the requirements of Section 165(i)(1) of the Dodd-Frank Act concerning supervisory stress tests to be conducted by the Federal Reserve Board (the “Annual Supervisory Stress Test Rule”) and Section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act regarding semi-annual company-run stress tests (the “Semi-Annual Company-Run Stress Test Rule,” and, together with the Annual Supervisory Stress Test Rule, the “Stress Test Rules”). The Stress Test Rules, effective on November 15, 2012, apply to bank holding companies with average total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more and nonbank financial companies designated by the Financial Stability Oversight Council. Concurrent with the Stress Test Rules, the Federal Reserve Board issued final rules implementing other requirements of Section 165(i)(2) of the Dodd-Frank Act regarding annual company-run stress tests (the “Annual Company-Run Stress Test Rules”). The Annual Company-Run Stress Test Rules, effective on November 15, 2012, apply to, bank holding companies with average total consolidated assets of greater than $10 billion but less than $50 billion and any state member bank that has average total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion. The Stress Test Rules and the Annual Company-Run Stress Test Rules set forth, among other things, the requirements on the methodology and scenarios for the stress tests and related publication requirements. On November 7, 2013, the Federal Reserve Board issued a final policy statement describing the processes it will use to develop scenarios for future capital planning and stress testing exercises. This policy statement became effective on January 1, 2014. On October 23, 2014, the Federal Reserve Board released the supervisory scenarios that will be used in the next round of stress tests.

On February 18, 2014, the Federal Reserve Board issued final rules (“Final SIFI Rules”) strengthening supervision and regulation of large U.S. bank holding companies and foreign banking organizations. The Final SIFI Rules established a number of enhanced prudential standards for large U.S. bank holding companies to help increase the resiliency of their operations. These standards include liquidity, risk management, and capital. For U.S. bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, the Final SIFI Rules incorporate the previously issued capital planning and stress testing requirements as an enhanced prudential standard. The Final SIFI Rules also require such a U.S. bank holding company to comply with enhanced risk-management and liquidity risk-management standards, conduct liquidity stress tests, and hold a buffer of highly liquid assets based on projected funding needs during a 30-day stress event. In addition, the Final SIFI Rules require publicly traded U.S. bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more to establish enterprise-wide risk committees.

In addition, on March 2014, the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), and the FDIC issued a Supervisory Guidance on Implementing Dodd-Frank Act Company-Run Stress Tests for Banking Organizations with Total Consolidated Assets of more than $10 Billion but less than $50 Billion. The guidance outlined supervisory expectations for Dodd-Frank Act stress test practices and offers additional details about methodologies that should be employed by banking organizations with total consolidated assets of more than $10 billion but less than $50 billion.

As of December 31, 2014, Popular had total consolidated assets of $33.1 billion. As of the same date, BPPR and BPNA had total consolidated assets of $27.1 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively.

Prompt Corrective Action

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (the “FDIA”) requires, among other things, the federal banking agencies to take prompt corrective action in respect of insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. The FDIA establishes five capital tiers: “well capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized”, and “critically undercapitalized”. The relevant capital measures are the total risk-based capital ratio, the Tier 1 risk- based capital ratio

 

19


Table of Contents

and the leverage ratio. A depository institution’s capital tier will depend upon how its capital levels compare with various relevant capital measures and certain other factors, as established by regulation. The relevant capital measures, which reflect changes under the Basel III Capital Rules that became effective on January 1, 2015, are the total capital ratio, the CET1 capital ratio (a new ratio requirement under the Basel III Capital Rules), the Tier 1 capital ratio and the leverage ratio.

An insured depository institution will be deemed to be (i) “well capitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a CET1 capital ratio of 6.5% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater (6.0% prior to January 1, 2015), and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater, and is not subject to any order or written directive by any such regulatory authority to meet and maintain a specific capital level for any capital measure; (ii) “adequately capitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a CET1 capital ratio of 4.5% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater (4.0% prior to January 1, 2015), and a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater and is not “well capitalized”; (iii) “undercapitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 8.0%, a CET1 capital ratio less than 4.5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0% (4.0% prior to January 1, 2015) or a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%; (iv) “significantly undercapitalized” if the institution has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a CET1 capital ratio less than 3%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0% (3.0% prior to January 1, 2015) or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0%; and (v) “critically undercapitalized” if the institution’s tangible equity is equal to or less than 2.0% of average quarterly tangible assets. An institution may be downgraded to, or deemed to be in, a capital category that is lower than indicated by its capital ratios if it is determined to be in an unsafe or unsound condition or if it receives an unsatisfactory examination rating with respect to certain matters. An insured depository institution’s capital category is determined solely for the purpose of applying prompt corrective action regulations, and the capital category may not constitute an accurate representation of the institution’s overall financial condition or prospects for other purposes.

The FDIC generally prohibits an insured depository institution from making any capital distribution (including payment of a dividend) or paying any management fee to its holding company, if the depository institution would thereafter be “undercapitalized”. “Undercapitalized” depository institutions are subject to restrictions on borrowing from the Federal Reserve System. In addition, undercapitalized depository institutions are subject to growth limitations and are required to submit capital restoration plans. A depository institution’s holding company must guarantee the capital plan, up to an amount equal to the lesser of 5% of the depository institution’s assets at the time it becomes undercapitalized or the amount of the capital deficiency when the institution fails to comply with the plan. The federal banking agencies may not accept a capital plan without determining, among other things, that the plan is based on realistic assumptions and is likely to succeed in restoring the depository institution’s capital. If a depository institution fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is significantly undercapitalized.

“Significantly undercapitalized” depository institutions may be subject to a number of requirements and restrictions, including orders to sell sufficient voting stock to become “adequately capitalized,” requirements to reduce total assets and cessation of receipt of deposits from correspondent banks. “Critically undercapitalized” depository institutions are subject to appointment of a receiver or conservator.

The capital-based prompt corrective action provisions of the FDIA apply to the FDIC-insured depository institutions such as BPPR and BPNA, but they are not directly applicable to holding companies such as Popular and PNA, which control such institutions. As noted above, the Proposed SIFI Rules address the Dodd-Frank Act’s early remediation requirements applicable to bank holding companies that have total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more.

Transactions with Affiliates

BPPR and BPNA are subject to restrictions under Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act that limit the amount of extensions of credit and certain other “covered transactions” (as defined in Section 23A) between BPPR or BPNA, on the one hand, and Popular, PNA or any of our other non-banking subsidiaries, on the other, and that impose collateralization requirements on such credit extensions. A bank may not engage in any covered transaction if the aggregate amount of the bank’s covered transactions with that affiliate would exceed 10% of the bank’s capital stock and surplus or the aggregate amount of the bank’s covered transactions with all affiliates would exceed 20% of the bank’s capital stock and surplus. In addition, Section 23B of the Federal Reserve Act requires that any transaction between BPPR or BPNA, on the one hand, and Popular, PNA or any of our other non-banking subsidiaries, on the other, be carried out on an arm’s length basis.

Source of Financial Strength

Under the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation Y, a bank holding company such as Popular or PNA is expected to act as a source of financial strength to each of its subsidiary banks and to commit resources to support each subsidiary bank. In addition, any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary depository institutions are subordinated in right of payment to

 

20


Table of Contents

deposits and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary depository institution. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal banking agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary depository institution will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment. BPPR and BPNA are currently the only insured depository institution subsidiaries of Popular and PNA.

Section 616 of the Dodd-Frank Act obligates the Federal Reserve Board to require bank holding companies to serve as a source of financial strength for any subsidiary depository institution. The term “source of financial strength” is defined as the ability of a company to provide financial assistance to its insured depository institution subsidiaries in the event of financial distress at such subsidiaries. The source-of-strength amendments in Section 616 took effect on July 21, 2011, and the appropriate federal banking agencies were required to jointly adopt implementing regulations not later than one year after that date. To date, however, the federal banking agencies have not proposed any regulations to implement Section 616. Prior to the Dodd-Frank Act, there was no explicit authority in the BHC Act for the source of strength provision in the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation Y.

“Living Will”

As required by Section 165(d) of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have jointly issued a final rule, which became effective on November 1, 2011, that requires certain organizations, including each bank holding company with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, to report periodically to the FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board the company’s plan for its rapid and orderly resolution in the event of material financial distress or failure. The final rule sets specific standards for the resolution plans, including requiring a strategic analysis of the plan’s components, a description of the range of specific actions the company proposes to take in resolution and a description of the company’s organizational structure, material entities, interconnections and interdependencies, and management information systems, among other elements.

In addition, the FDIC has issued a final rule, which became effective on April 1, 2012, that requires insured depository institutions with total assets of $50 billion or more to submit to the FDIC periodic contingency plans for resolution in the event of the institution’s failure. The rule requires these institutions to submit a resolution plan that will enable the FDIC, as receiver, to resolve the institution in a manner that ensures that depositors receive access to their insured deposits within one business day of the institution’s failure (two business days if the failure occurs on a day other than a Friday), maximizes the net-present-value return from the sale or disposition of its assets, and minimizes the amount of any loss to be realized by the institution’s creditors.

As of December 31, 2014, BPPR and BPNA had total consolidated assets of $27.1 billion and $5.5 billion, respectively.

Dividend Restrictions

The principal sources of funding for the holding companies have included dividends received from their banking and non-banking subsidiaries, asset sales and proceeds from the issuance of medium-term notes, junior subordinated debentures and equity. Various statutory provisions limit the amount of dividends an insured depository institution may pay to its holding company without regulatory approval. A member bank must obtain the approval of the Federal Reserve Board for any dividend, if the total of all dividends declared by the member bank during the calendar year would exceed the total of its net income (as reportable in its Report of Condition and Income) for that year, combined with its retained net income (as defined by regulation) for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. In addition, a member bank may not declare or pay a dividend in an amount greater than its undivided profits as reported in its Report of Condition and Income, unless the member bank has received the approval of the Federal Reserve Board. A member bank also may not permit any portion of its permanent capital to be withdrawn unless the withdrawal has been approved by the Federal Reserve Board. Subject to the Federal Reserve’s ability to establish more stringent specific requirements under its supervisory or enforcement authority, at December 31, 2014, BPPR could have declared a dividend of approximately $542 million. On October 20, 2014, the Memorandum of Understanding (the “FRB-NY MOU”) entered into on July 20, 2011 among Popular, Inc., BPPR, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “FRB-NY”) and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico was terminated. The FRB-NY MOU provided, among other things, for the Corporation to take steps to improve its credit risk management practices and asset quality, and for the Corporation to develop strategic plans to improve earnings and to develop capital plans. The FRB-NY MOU also required the Corporation to obtain approval from the applicable FRB-NY MOU counterparties prior to, among other things, declaring or paying dividends, purchasing or redeeming any shares of its stock, consummating acquisitions or mergers, or making any distributions on its trust preferred securities or subordinated debentures. On January 9, 2015, another Memorandum of Understanding entered into among BPNA, the FRB-NY and the New York State Department of Financial Services (the “NYSDFS”), effective on July 25, 2011, was also terminated. This Memorandum of Understanding provided that BPNA could not declare dividends without the approval of the FRB-NY and the NYSDFS.

It is Federal Reserve Board policy that bank holding companies generally should pay dividends on common stock only out of net income available to common shareholders over the past year and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention appears

 

21


Table of Contents

consistent with the organization’s current and expected future capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. Moreover, under Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company should not maintain dividend levels that place undue pressure on the capital of depository institution subsidiaries or that may undermine the bank holding company’s ability to be a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries. The Federal Reserve Board has indicated that in the capital plans submitted by bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more, requests that imply common dividend payout ratios above 30% of projected after-tax net income will receive particularly close scrutiny. For further information please refer to Part II, Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities”.

Under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004, subject to compliance with certain conditions, distributions of U.S. sourced dividends to a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are subject to a withholding tax of 10% instead of the 30% applied to other “foreign” corporations.

See “Puerto Rico Regulation—General” below for a description of certain restrictions on BPPR’s ability to pay dividends under Puerto Rico law.

FDIC Insurance

BPPR and BPNA are subject to FDIC deposit insurance assessments. The Federal Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 (the “Reform Act”) created a single DIF, increased the maximum amount of FDIC insurance coverage for certain retirement accounts, and provided for possible “inflation adjustments” in the maximum amount of coverage available with respect to other insured accounts. Under the Reform Act, the FDIC made significant changes to its risk-based assessment system so that effective January 1, 2007, the FDIC imposed insurance premiums based upon a matrix that is designed to more closely tie what banks pay for deposit insurance to the risks they pose.

The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) temporarily raised the basic limit on federal deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor. Section 335 of the Dodd-Frank Act made permanent the $250,000 standard maximum limit for federal deposit insurance. In addition, from December 31, 2010 until January 1, 2013, Section 335 provided temporary unlimited federal deposit insurance protection for non-interest bearing transaction accounts that are payable on demand at insured depository institutions. The temporary unlimited federal deposit insurance protection for non-interest bearing transaction accounts expired on January 1, 2013.

Section 334 of the Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the ceiling on the size of the DIF (1.5 percent of estimated insured deposits prior to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act). Section 334 also raised the statutorily required floor for the DIF from 1.15 % of estimated insured deposits to 1.35 % of estimated insured deposits, or a comparable percentage of the revised assessment base required by the Dodd-Frank Act, which is based on average total assets less average tangible equity. Section 334 required the FDIC to take the steps necessary for the DIF to meet this revised reserve ratio by September 30, 2020.

On October 19, 2010, the FDIC adopted a new Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Restoration Plan (the “Restoration Plan”) for the DIF to ensure that the fund reserve ratio reaches 1.35% by September 30, 2020, as required by Section 334 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Under the Restoration Plan, the FDIC has foregone the uniform three-basis point increase in initial assessment rates previously scheduled to take place on January 1, 2011. On December 14, 2010, the FDIC adopted a final rule, which became effective on January 1, 2011, to set the DIF’s designated reserve ratio at 2% of estimated insured deposits.

As required by Sections 331 and 332 of the Dodd-Frank Act, on February 7, 2011, the FDIC adopted a final rule relating to deposit insurance assessment base, assessment rate adjustments, deposit insurance assessment rates, dividends, and large bank pricing methodology, which became effective on April 1, 2011. Under the final rule, the assessment base for an insured depository institution is the average consolidated total assets of the insured depository institution minus the average tangible equity of the institution during the assessment period. Prior to April 1, 2011, only deposits payable in the United States were included in determining the premium paid by an institution.

The Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 separated the Financing Corporation (“FICO”) assessment to service the interest on its bond obligations from the DIF assessment. The amount assessed on individual institutions by the FICO is in addition to the amount paid for deposit insurance according to the FDIC’s risk-related assessment rate schedules. The FICO assessment rate for the first quarter of 2015 was 0.600 basis points of the assessment base.

As of December 31, 2014, we had a DIF average total asset less average tangible equity assessment base of approximately $29 billion.

 

22


Table of Contents

Brokered Deposits

The FDIA governs the receipt of brokered deposits. Section 29 of the FDIA and the regulations adopted thereunder restrict the use of brokered deposits and the rate of interest payable on deposits for institutions that are less than well capitalized. There are no such restrictions on a bank that is well capitalized. Popular does not believe the brokered deposits regulation has had or will have a material effect on the funding or liquidity of BPPR and BPNA.

Capital Adequacy

Under the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies and member banks in effect as of December 31, 2014, the minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet items, such as standby letters of credit) was 8%. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board established minimum leverage ratio guidelines for bank holding companies and member banks. These guidelines provided for a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets, less goodwill and certain other intangible assets (the “leverage ratio”) of 3% for bank holding companies and member banks that have the highest regulatory rating or have implemented the Federal Reserve Board’s market risk capital measure. All other bank holding companies and member banks were required to maintain a minimum leverage ratio of 4%. See Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 28 “Regulatory Capital Requirements” for the capital ratios of Popular, BPPR and BPNA.

Section 171 of the Dodd-Frank Act (the “Collins Amendment”) required the federal banking agencies to establish minimum leverage and risk-based capital requirements that apply on a consolidated basis for insured depository institutions and their holding companies. In effect, the Collins Amendment applied to bank holding companies the same leverage and risk-based capital requirements that apply to insured depository institutions. Because the capital requirements must be the same for insured depository institutions and their holding companies, the Collins Amendment excludes trust preferred securities from Tier 1 capital, subject to phase-out from Tier 1 qualification for trust preferred securities issued before May 19, 2010, with the phase-out commencing on January 1, 2013 and to be implemented “incrementally” over a three-year period commencing on that date. Debt or equity instruments issued to the United States or any agency or instrumentality thereof prior to October 10, 2010, pursuant to the EESA, is exempted from the requirements of the Collins Amendment. Under the rules in place prior to the Collins Amendment, trust preferred securities (in addition to, among others, common equity, retained earnings, minority interests in equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries) could be included in Tier 1 capital for bank holding companies, provided that not more than 25% of qualifying Tier 1 capital could consist of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, trust preferred securities or other “so-called” restricted core capital elements.

As required by the Collins Amendment, the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC jointly issued a final rule related to risk-based capital standards. Pursuant to the final rule, which became effective on July 28, 2011, a banking organization operating under the agencies’ advanced approaches risk-based capital rules is required to meet the higher of the minimum requirements under the general risk-based capital rules and the minimum requirements under the advanced approaches risk-based capital rules.

In addition, the Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule, which became effective on December 30, 2011, requiring top-tier U.S. bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $50 billion or more to submit annual capital plans, with their related stress test requirements, to the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank for review and to generally obtain regulatory approval before making capital distributions, which include dividends and purchases of capital securities and instruments.

Banking organizations are expected to maintain at least 50 percent of their Tier 1 capital as common equity. “Tier 2 capital” consists of, among other things, a limited amount of subordinated debt, other preferred stock, certain other instruments and a limited amount of loan and lease loss reserves.

At December 31, 2014, Popular had $427 million in trust preferred securities (capital securities) that are subject to the phase-out. Popular has not issued any trust preferred securities since May 19, 2010. At December 31, 2013, the remaining trust preferred securities (which were redeemed in July 2014) corresponded to capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury pursuant to the EESA.

Rules to Implement Basel III Capital Requirements

On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve Board approved the Basel III Capital Rules to establish a new comprehensive regulatory capital framework for all U.S. banking organizations. On July 9, 2013, the Basel III Capital Rules were approved by the OCC and (as interim final rules) by the FDIC.

 

23


Table of Contents

The Basel III Capital Rules generally implement the Basel Committee’s December 2010 final capital framework referred to as “Basel III” for strengthening international capital standards. The Basel III Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries, including Popular, BPPR and BPNA, as compared to the prior U.S. general risk-based capital rules. The Basel III Capital Rules revise the definitions and the components of regulatory capital, as well as address other issues affecting the numerator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios. The Basel III Capital Rules also address asset risk weights and other matters affecting the denominator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios and replace the prior general risk-weighting approach, which was derived from the Basel Committee’s 1988 “Basel I” capital accords, with a more risk-sensitive approach based, in part, on the “standardized approach” in the Basel Committee’s 2004 “Basel II” capital accords. In addition, the Basel III Capital Rules implement certain provisions of Dodd-Frank Act, including the requirements of Section 939A to remove references to credit ratings from the federal agencies’ rules. The Basel III Capital Rules became effective for Popular, BPPR and BPNA on January 1, 2015, subject to phase-in periods for certain of their components and other provisions.

Among other matters, the Basel III Capital Rules: (i) introduce a new capital measure called “Common Equity Tier 1” (“CET1”) and related regulatory capital ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets; (ii) specify that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments meeting certain revised requirements; (iii) mandate that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital; and (iv) expand the scope of the deductions from and adjustments to capital as compared to prior regulations. Under the Basel III Capital Rules, for most banking organizations, including the Corporation, the most common form of Additional Tier 1 capital is non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and the most common form of Tier 2 capital is subordinated notes and a portion of the allocation for loan and lease losses, in each case, subject to the Basel III Capital Rules’ specific requirements.

Pursuant to the Basel III Capital Rules, the minimum capital ratios that became effective on January 1, 2015 are as follows:

 

   

4.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;

 

   

6.0% Tier 1 capital (that is, CET1 plus Additional Tier 1 capital) to risk-weighted assets;

 

   

8.0% Total capital (that is, Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets; and

 

   

4% Tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets as reported on consolidated financial statements (known as the “leverage ratio”).

The Basel III Capital Rules also introduce a new “capital conservation buffer”, composed entirely of CET1, on top of these minimum risk-weighted asset ratios. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the capital conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall. Thus, when fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, Popular, BPPR and BPNA will be required to maintain such additional capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of CET1, effectively resulting in minimum ratios of (i) CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7%, (ii) Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.5%, and (iii) Total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 10.5%.

The Basel III Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These include, for example, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net operating loss carrybacks and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such items, in the aggregate, exceed 15% of CET1.

In addition, under the prior general risk-based capital rules, the effects of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss (“AOCI”) items included in shareholders’ equity (for example, marks-to-market of securities held in the available for sale portfolio) under U.S. GAAP are reversed for the purposes of determining regulatory capital ratios. Pursuant to the Basel III Capital Rules, the effects of certain AOCI items are not excluded; however, non-advanced approaches banking organizations, including Popular, BPPR and BPNA, may make a one-time permanent election to continue to exclude these items. This election must be made concurrently with the first filing of certain of Popular’s, BPPR’s and BPNA’s periodic regulatory reports in the beginning of 2015. Popular, BPPR and BPNA expect to make this election in order to avoid significant variations in the level of capital depending upon the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the fair value of their securities portfolio. The Basel III Capital Rules also preclude certain hybrid securities, such as trust preferred securities, from inclusion in bank holding companies’ Tier 1 capital, subject to phase-out in the case of bank holding companies that had $15 billion or more in total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009. The Corporation’s Tier I capital level at December 31, 2014, included $ 427 million of trust preferred securities that are subject to the phase-out provisions of the Basel III Capital Rules. The Corporation would be allowed to include only 25 percent of such trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital as of January 1, 2015 and 0 percent as of January 1, 2016, and thereafter. Trust preferred

 

24


Table of Contents

securities no longer included in Popular’s Tier 1 capital may nonetheless be included as a component of Tier 2 capital on a permanent basis without phase-out and irrespective of whether such securities otherwise meet the revised definition of Tier 2 capital set forth in the Basel III Capital Rules.

Implementation of the deductions and other adjustments to CET1 began on January 1, 2015 and will be phased-in over a 4-year period (beginning at 40% on January 1, 2015 and an additional 20% per year thereafter). The implementation of the capital conservation buffer will begin on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and increase by 0.625% on each subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019.

With respect to BPPR and BPNA, the Basel III Capital Rules revise the “prompt corrective action” (“PCA”) regulations adopted pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, by: (i) introducing a CET1 ratio requirement at each PCA category (other than critically undercapitalized), with the required CET1 ratio being 6.5% for well-capitalized status; (ii) increasing the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio requirement for each category, with the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio for well-capitalized status being 8% (as compared to the prior 6%); and (iii) eliminating the prior provision that provides that a bank with a composite supervisory rating of 1 may have a 3% leverage ratio and still be adequately capitalized. The Basel III Capital Rules do not change the total risk-based capital requirement for any PCA category. Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject Popular and its depository institution subsidiaries to a variety of enforcement remedies, including the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC and to certain restrictions on our business. See “– Prompt Corrective Action”.

The Basel III Capital Rules prescribe a new standardized approach for risk weightings that expand the risk-weighting categories from the prior four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset classes.

We believe that Popular, BPPR and BPNA will be able to meet well-capitalized capital ratios upon implementation of the revised requirements, as finalized. Refer to Table 24 of Management’s Discussion and Analysis included in this Form 10K for a preliminary estimate of the Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios and risk-weighted assets on a fully-phased in basis and on a transitional basis under the methodologies set forth in the Basel III Capital Rules based on our current understanding of those Rules and subject to certain assumptions.

Interstate Branching

Section 613 of the Dodd-Frank Act amended the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the “Interstate Banking Act”) to authorize national banks and state banks to branch interstate through de novo branches. This section became effective on July 22, 2010. Prior to the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, the Interstate Banking Act provided that states may make an “opt-in” election to permit interstate branching through de novo branches. A majority of states did not opt in. Section 613 of the Dodd-Frank Act eliminated such required “opt-in” election. For purposes of the Interstate Banking Act, BPPR is treated as a state bank and is subject to the same restrictions on interstate branching as are other state banks.

Activities and Acquisitions

Under the BHC Act, the activities of bank holding companies and their non-banking subsidiaries have been limited to the business of banking and activities closely related to banking, and no bank holding company could directly or indirectly acquire ownership or control of more than 5% of any class of voting shares or substantially all of the assets of any company in the United States, including a bank, without the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board. In addition, bank holding companies generally have been prohibited under the BHC Act from engaging in non-banking activities, unless such activities were found by the Federal Reserve Board to be closely related to banking.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act allows bank holding companies whose subsidiary depository institutions meet management, capital and Community Reinvestment Act standards to engage in a substantially broader range of nonbanking financial activities than is permissible for bank holding companies that fail to meet those standards, including securities underwriting and dealing, insurance underwriting and making merchant banking investments in nonfinancial companies. In order for a bank holding company to engage in the broader range of activities that are permitted by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (i) all of its depository institution subsidiaries must be well capitalized (as described above), and well managed and (ii) it must file a declaration with the Federal Reserve Board that it elects to be a “financial holding company.” In addition, Section 606 of the Dodd-Frank Act requires that a bank holding company that is a financial holding company and therefore may engage in the expanded financial activities authorized by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act be and remain well-capitalized and well managed. Popular and PNA have elected to be treated as financial holding companies. A depository institution is deemed to be “well managed” if at its most recent inspection, examination or subsequent review by the appropriate federal banking agency (or the appropriate state banking agency), the depository institution

 

25


Table of Contents

received at least a “satisfactory” composite rating and at least a “satisfactory” rating for the management component of the composite rating. If, after becoming a financial holding company, the company fails to continue to meet any of the capital or managerial requirements for financial holding company status, the company must enter into a confidential agreement with the Federal Reserve Board to comply with all applicable capital and management requirements. If the company does not return to compliance within 180 days, the Federal Reserve Board may extend the agreement or may order the company to divest its subsidiary banks or the company may discontinue, or divest investments in companies engaged in, activities permissible only for a bank holding company that has elected to be treated as a financial holding company.

Pursuant to Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act, commonly called the “Volcker Rule,” which became effective on July 21, 2012, the U.S. financial regulatory agencies are required to adopt rules that prohibit banks and their affiliates from engaging in proprietary trading and investing in and sponsoring certain unregistered investment companies (defined as hedge funds and private equity funds). In December 2013, Federal regulators adopted final rules to implement the Volcker Rule. The final rules are highly complex, and many aspects of their application remain uncertain. We are continuing to evaluate the effects of the final rules, but we do not currently anticipate that the Volcker Rule will have a material effect on our operations. Development and monitoring of the required compliance program, however, may require the expenditure of significant resources and management attention.

The Federal Reserve Board has the authority to limit and may in certain circumstances limit our ability to conduct activities and make acquisitions that would otherwise be permissible for a financial holding company. In addition, we are required to obtain prior Federal Reserve Board approval before engaging in certain banking and other financial activities both in the United States and abroad.

Pursuant to Section 163 of the Dodd-Frank Act, bank holding companies with total consolidated assets greater than $50 billion (regardless of whether such bank holding companies have elected to be treated as financial holding companies) must provide prior written notice to the Federal Reserve Board before acquiring shares of certain financial companies with assets in excess of $10 billion, unless an exception applies. In addition, Section 604 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which became effective on July 21, 2011, added a new application requirement before a financial holding company (regardless of its size) may acquire a nonbank company with $10 billion or more in total consolidated assets. As of December 31, 2014, Popular had total consolidated assets of $33.1 billion.

Anti-Money Laundering Initiative and the USA PATRIOT Act

A major focus of governmental policy relating to financial institutions in recent years has been aimed at combating money laundering and terrorist financing. The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 (the “USA PATRIOT Act”) strengthened the ability of the U.S. government to help prevent, detect and prosecute international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act imposed significant compliance and due diligence obligations, created new crimes and penalties and expanded the extra-territorial jurisdiction of the United States. Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA PATRIOT Act’s requirements could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution.

Community Reinvestment Act

The Community Reinvestment Act requires banks to help serve the credit needs of their communities, including extending credit to low- and moderate-income individuals and geographies. Should Popular or our bank subsidiaries fail to serve adequately the community, potential penalties may include regulatory denials of applications to expand branches, relocate, add subsidiaries and affiliates, expand into new financial activities and merge with or purchase other financial institutions.

Interchange Fees Regulation.

Section 1075(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act added a new Section 920 of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act, which gives the Federal Reserve Board the authority to establish rules regarding interchange fees charged by payment card issuers for electronic debit transactions, and to enforce a new statutory requirement that such fees be reasonable and proportional to the actual cost of a transaction to the issuer, with specific allowances for the costs of fraud prevention. On June 29, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule establishing standards for debit card interchange fees and prohibiting network exclusivity arrangements and routing restrictions. The final rule regarding debit card interchange fees became effective on October 1, 2011. Under the final rule, the maximum permissible interchange fee that an issuer may receive for an electronic debit transaction is the sum of 21 cents per transaction and 5 basis points multiplied by the value of the transaction. Also on June 29, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board approved an interim final rule that allows for an upward adjustment of no more than 1 cent to an issuer’s debit card interchange fee if the issuer develops and implements policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve the fraud-prevention standards set out in the interim final rule. The interim final rule regarding fraud-prevention adjustment also became effective on October 1, 2011.

 

26


Table of Contents

Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010

Title X of the Dodd-Frank Act, also known as the “Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010” or “CFPA,” created a new consumer financial services regulator, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, commonly called the “CFPB”, which has assumed most of the consumer financial services regulatory responsibilities currently exercised by federal banking regulators and other agencies. The CFPB’s primary functions include the supervision of “covered persons” (broadly defined to include any person offering or providing a consumer financial product or service and any affiliated service provider) for compliance with federal consumer financial laws. The CFPB also has the broad power to prescribe rules applicable to a covered person or service provider identifying as unlawful, unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. We are subject to examination and regulation by the CFPB.

Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulation

The United States has imposed economic sanctions that affect transactions with designated foreign countries, nationals and others. These are typically known as the “OFAC” rules based on their administration by the U.S. Treasury Department Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). The OFAC-administered sanctions targeting countries take many different forms. Generally, however, they contain one or more of the following elements: (i) restrictions on trade with or investment in a sanctioned country; and (ii) a blocking of assets in which the government of the sanctioned country or other specially designated nationals have an interest, by prohibiting transfers of property subject to U.S. jurisdiction (including property in the United States or the possession or control of U.S. persons outside of the United States). Blocked assets (e.g., property and bank deposits) cannot be paid out, withdrawn, set off or transferred in any manner without a license from OFAC. Failure to comply with these sanctions could have serious legal and reputational consequences.

Puerto Rico Regulation

As a commercial bank organized under the laws of Puerto Rico, BPPR is subject to supervision, examination and regulation by the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions, pursuant to the Puerto Rico Banking Act of 1933, as amended (the “Banking Law”).

Section 27 of the Banking Law requires that at least ten percent (10%) of the yearly net income of BPPR be credited annually to a reserve fund. The apportionment must be done every year until the reserve fund is equal to the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. During 2014, $23.5 million was transferred to the statutory reserve account. During 2014, BPPR was in compliance with the statutory reserve requirement.

Section 27 of the Banking Law also provides that when the expenditures of a bank are greater than its receipts, the excess of the former over the latter must be charged against the undistributed profits of the bank, and the balance, if any, must be charged against the reserve fund. If the reserve fund is not sufficient to cover such balance in whole or in part, the outstanding amount must be charged against the capital account and no dividend may be declared until capital has been restored to its original amount and the reserve fund to 20% of the original capital.

Section 16 of the Banking Law requires every bank to maintain a legal reserve that, except as otherwise provided by the Office of the Commissioner, may not be less than 20% of its demand liabilities, excluding government deposits (federal, state and municipal) which are secured by collateral. If a bank is authorized to establish one or more bank branches in a state of the United States or in a foreign country, where such branches are subject to the reserve requirements of that state or country, the Office of the Commissioner may exempt said branch or branches from the reserve requirements of Section 16. Pursuant to an order of the Federal Reserve Board dated November 24, 1982, BPPR has been exempted from the reserve requirements of the Federal Reserve System with respect to deposits payable in Puerto Rico. Accordingly, BPPR is subject to the reserve requirements prescribed by the Banking Law.

As previously mentioned in the Business section, Section 17 of the Banking Law permits a bank to make loans to any one person, firm, partnership or corporation, up to an aggregate amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the paid-in capital and reserve fund of the bank. As of December 31, 2014, the legal lending limit for BPPR under this provision was approximately $265 million. In the case of loans which are secured by collateral worth at least 25% more than the amount of the loan, the maximum aggregate amount is increased to one third of the paid-in capital of the bank, plus its reserve fund. If the institution is well capitalized and had been rated 1 in the last examination performed by the Office of the Commissioner or any regulatory agency, its legal lending limit shall also include 15% of 50% of its undivided profits and for loans secured by collateral worth at least 25% more than the amount of the loan, the capital of the bank shall also include 33 1/3% of 50% of its undivided profits. Institutions rated 2 in their last regulatory

 

27


Table of Contents

examination may include this additional component in their legal lending limit only with the previous authorization of the Office of the Commissioner. There are no restrictions under Section 17 on the amount of loans that are wholly secured by bonds, securities and other evidence of indebtedness of the Government of the United States or Puerto Rico, or by current debt bonds, not in default, of municipalities or instrumentalities of Puerto Rico.

Section 14 of the Banking Law authorizes a bank to conduct certain financial and related activities directly or through subsidiaries, including finance leasing of personal property and originating and servicing mortgage loans. BPPR engages in finance leasing through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Popular Auto, LLC, which is organized and operates in Puerto Rico. The origination and servicing mortgage loans is conducted by Popular Mortgage, a division of BPPR.

Available Information

We maintain an Internet website at www.popular.com. Via the “Investor Relations” link at our website, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8 -K and amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), are available, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after such forms are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an internet website at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. You may obtain copies of our filings on the SEC site.

We have adopted a written code of ethics that applies to all directors, officers and employees of Popular, including our principal executive officer and senior financial officers, in accordance with Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the SEC promulgated thereunder. Our Code of Ethics is available on our corporate website, www.popular.com, in the section entitled “Corporate Governance.” In the event that we make changes in, or provide waivers from, the provisions of this Code of Ethics that the SEC requires us to disclose, we intend to disclose these events on our corporate website in such section. In the Corporate Governance section of our corporate website, we have also posted the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines. In addition, information concerning purchases and sales of our equity securities by our executive officers and directors is posted on our website.

All website addresses given in this document are for information only and are not intended to be an active link or to incorporate any website information into this document.

 

28


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Popular, like other financial institutions, faces a number of risks inherent to our business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations and capital position. These risks could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report.

The risks described in this report are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known by us or that we currently deem to be immaterial, or that are generally applicable to all financial institutions, also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

RISKS RELATING TO THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND OUR INDUSTRY

Weakness in the economy and in the real estate market in our geographic footprint has adversely impacted and may continue to adversely impact us.

Popular is exposed to geographical and government risk. A significant portion of our financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated in Puerto Rico, which entered into a recession in the second quarter of 2006. Puerto Rico’s gross national product contracted in real terms in every year between fiscal year 2007 and fiscal year 2011 (inclusive), and grew by 0.9% (revised figures) and 0.3% (preliminary) in fiscal years 2012 and 2013. According to the Puerto Rico Planning Board, for fiscal years 2014 and 2015, gross national product is projected to increase by only 0.1% and 0.2%. However, the monthly economic indicators for fiscal year 2014 indicate that the final GNP figures for fiscal year 2014 may be lower than the last projection presented by the Puerto Rico Planning Board. The latest Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (“GDB”) Economic Activity Index, which is a coincident indicator of ongoing economic activity, reflected a 1.4% year-over-year reduction for December 2014, after showing a 2.1% year-over-year reduction for November 2014.

This persistent contraction or minimal growth has had an adverse effect on employment. A reduction in total employment began in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 (ending June 30, 2007) and has continued consistently through fiscal year 2014 (ending June 30, 2014) due to the current recession and contractionary fiscal adjustment measures. According to the Household Survey (conducted by the Puerto Rico Department of Labor and Human Resources), the number of persons employed in Puerto Rico during fiscal year 2013 (ended June 30, 2013) averaged 1,029,019, a decrease of 0.6% compared to the previous fiscal year; and the unemployment rate averaged 14.0%. For fiscal year 2014 (ended June 30, 2014), the number of persons employed in Puerto Rico averaged 1,006,646, a decrease of 2.2% compared to the previous fiscal year; and the unemployment rate averaged 14.3%. During the first three months of fiscal year 2015 (July 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014), total employment averaged 974,800, a 3.3% reduction with respect to the same period of the prior year, and the unemployment rate averaged 14.7%.

In February 2014, the three principal rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) lowered their ratings on the General Obligation bonds of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the bonds of several other Commonwealth instrumentalities to non-investment grade ratings. In connection with their rating actions, the rating agencies noted various factors, including high levels of public debt, the lack of a clear economic growth catalysts, recurring fiscal budget deficits, the financial condition of the public sector employee pension plans and, more recently, liquidity concerns regarding the Commonwealth and the GDB and their ability to access the capital markets.

On June 28, 2014, Governor Alejandro García Padilla signed into law the Puerto Rico Public Corporation Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act (the “Recovery Act”) which provides a framework for certain public corporations, including the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”), the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority, to restructure their debt obligations in order to ensure that the services they provide to the public are not interrupted. On July 1, 2014, Moody’s, as a consequence of the enactment of the Recovery Act, again downgraded the majority of the Puerto Rico central government and public instrumentalities’ obligations, expressing its concern for all of Puerto Rico’s municipal debt based on the deteriorating fiscal situation on the Island and the possibility that application of the new law may further limit the Commonwealth’s ability to access the capital markets. Shortly thereafter, both S&P and Fitch later issued ratings downgrades for various Puerto Rico municipal issuers, including PREPA.

In July 2014, certain holders of PREPA bonds and an investment manager, on behalf of funds which hold PREPA bonds, filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (the “District Court”) seeking a declaratory judgment that the Recovery Act violates several provisions of the United States Constitution. The District Court consolidated the

 

29


Table of Contents

actions. On February 10, 2015, the District Court entered judgment that the Recovery Act is preempted by the federal Bankruptcy Code and is therefore void pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. The District Court permanently enjoined the Commonwealth officers from enforcing the Recovery Act. The Commonwealth has filed a notice of appeal and has indicated that it will continue to defend vigorously the constitutionality of the Recovery Act.

On February 10, 2015, the Governor announced a proposal for a new tax code that would replace the current 7% sales and use tax with a 16% value-added tax, while significantly lowering income taxes. The proposal seeks to create a fair and effective system by primarily taxing consumption, rather than productivity, and to increase tax revenues to the government by reducing tax evasion. While legislation for the new tax code has been filed, it is too early to determine what changes will be made during the legislative process and what effect this proposal, if enacted into law, will have on economic activity.

On February 12, 2015, S&P further downgraded the debt rating of the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities. S&P stated that, in their view, Puerto Rico’s current economic and financial trajectory is now more susceptible to adverse financial, economic and market conditions that could ultimately impair the Commonwealth’s ability to fund services and its debt commitments. S&P also cited implementation risk with respect to the value-added tax and expressed concern that, while higher taxes could improve the budget balance, there could be potential negative economic implications. On February 19, 2015, Moody’s also downgraded its debt ratings for the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities, citing similar concerns as S&P.

The lingering effects of the prolonged recession are still reflected in limited loan demand, an increase in the rate of foreclosures and delinquencies on mortgage loans granted in Puerto Rico. If global or local economic conditions worsen or the Government is unable to access the capital markets and manage its fiscal problems in an orderly manner, those adverse effects could continue or worsen. Any reduction in consumer spending or deterioration in creditworthiness of borrowers or their collateral as a result of these issues may also adversely impact our results of operations or financial condition.

For additional information regarding the Puerto Rico economy, refer to “Geographical and government risk” in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of the Annual Report.

Further deterioration in collateral values of properties securing our construction, commercial and mortgage loan portfolios would result in increased credit losses and continue to harm our results of operations.

Further deterioration of the value of real estate collateral securing our construction, commercial and mortgage loan portfolios would result in increased credit losses. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 1%, 24% and 34% of our non-covered loan portfolio consisted of construction loans, commercial loans secured by real estate and mortgage loans, respectively.

Substantially our entire loan portfolio is located within the boundaries of the U.S. economy. Whether the collateral is located in Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, the British Virgin Islands or the U.S. mainland, the performance of our loan portfolio and the collateral value backing the transactions are dependent upon the performance of and conditions within each specific real estate market. Recent economic reports related to the real estate market in Puerto Rico indicate that several sectors of the real estate market are subject to reductions in value related to general economic conditions. In certain mainland markets like southern Florida, Illinois and California, we have experienced the negative impact associated with low absorption rates and property value adjustments due to overbuilding. We exited the Illinois and California operations in 2014. We measure loan impairment based on the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent, which is derived from estimated collateral values, principally obtained from appraisal reports that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, size and supply and demand. An appraisal report is only an estimate of the value of the property at the time the appraisal is made. If the appraisal does not reflect the amount that may be obtained upon any sale or foreclosure of the property, we may not realize an amount equal to the indebtedness secured by the property. In addition, given the current slowdown in the real estate market in Puerto Rico, the properties securing these loans may be difficult to dispose of, if foreclosed.

Construction and commercial loans, mostly secured by commercial and residential real estate properties, entail a higher credit risk than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since they are larger in size, may have less collateral coverage, concentrate more risk in a single borrower and are generally more sensitive to economic downturns. As of December 31, 2014, non-covered commercial and construction loans secured by commercial real estate properties, amounted to $ 4.9 billion or 25% of the total non-covered loan portfolio.

 

30


Table of Contents

BPPR has various subsidiaries holding specific assets acquired in satisfaction of loans for real estate development projects. Total non-covered assets of those subsidiaries amounted to $18.4 million as of December 31, 2014, of which $2.7 million or 15% of total non-covered assets are foreclosed properties.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, net charge-offs specifically related to values of properties securing our non-covered construction, commercial and mortgage loan portfolios totaled $ 2.3 million, $ 30.0 million and $ 9.3 million, respectively. Continued deterioration of the fair value of real estate properties for collateral dependent impaired loans would require increases in our provision for loan losses and allowance for loan losses. Any such increase would have an adverse effect on our future financial condition and results of operations. For more information on the credit quality of our construction, commercial and mortgage portfolio, see the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in the Annual Report.

Difficult market conditions have adversely affected the financial industry and our results of operations and financial condition.

During the financial crisis that commenced in 2008, market instability and lack of investor confidence led many lenders and institutional investors to reduce or cease providing funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions. This led to an increased level of commercial and consumer delinquencies, lack of consumer confidence, increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity in general. The resulting economic pressures on consumers and uncertainty about the financial markets adversely affected our industry and our business, results of operations and financial condition. The increased regulation of our industry, including as a result of the EESA and the Dodd-Frank Act and the creation of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Compliance may increase our costs and limit our ability to pursue business opportunities. The lingering effects of these circumstances have continued to affect our business. A re-occurrence of these difficult conditions would exacerbate the economic challenges facing us and others in the financial industry.

Legislative and regulatory reforms may have a significant impact on our business and results of operations.

Popular is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by federal and Puerto Rico banking authorities. Any change in applicable federal or Puerto Rico laws or regulations could have a substantial impact on our operations. Additional laws and regulations may be enacted or adopted in the future that could significantly affect Popular’s powers, authority and operations, which could have a material adverse effect on Popular’s financial condition and results of operations. Further, regulators in the performance of their supervisory and enforcement duties, have significant discretion and power to prevent or remedy unsafe and unsound practices or violations of laws by banks and bank holding companies. The exercise of this regulatory discretion and power would have a negative impact on Popular.

In 2008, responding to what has been commonly referred to as the financial crisis, government regulatory agencies and political bodies began placing increased focus and scrutiny on the financial services industry. The U.S. Government intervened on an unprecedented scale. Several funding and capital programs by the Federal Reserve Board and the U.S. Treasury were launched in 2008 and 2009, with the objective of enhancing financial institutions’ ability to raise liquidity. These programs had the effect of increasing the degree or nature of regulatory supervision to which we are subjected. These and other potential regulation and scrutiny may, or proposed legislative and regulatory changes could, significantly increase our costs, impede the efficiency of our internal business processes, require us to increase our regulatory capital and, limit our ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner or otherwise adversely affect our results of operations or earnings.

In an effort to address the Commonwealth’s ongoing fiscal problems, the Government has enacted tax reform in the past and is expected to do so in the future. In 2014, the Government of Puerto Rico approved an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code, which, among other things, changed the income tax rate for capital gains from 15% to 20%. As a result, the Corporation recognized an income tax expense of approximately $20.0 million during 2014. In addition, on February 10, 2015, the Governor announced a proposal for a new tax code that would replace the current 7% sales and use tax with a 16% value-added tax, while significantly lowering income taxes. While legislation for the new tax code has been filed, it is too early to determine what changes will be made during the legislative process. Legislative changes, particularly changes in tax laws, could adversely impact our results of operations.

The Dodd-Frank Act imposes new capital requirements, assessments and restrictions on our businesses, impacting the profitability of our business activities and changing certain of our business practices, and could expose us to additional costs, including increased compliance costs.

 

31


Table of Contents

On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law, which significantly changes the regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions affecting large and small financial institutions alike, including several provisions that will affect how community banks, thrifts, and small bank and thrift holding companies will be regulated in the future.

The Dodd-Frank Act, among other things, imposes new capital requirements on bank holding companies; changes the base for FDIC insurance assessments to a bank’s average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity, rather than upon its deposit base, permanently raises the standard deposit insurance limit to $250,000; and expands the FDIC’s authority to raise insurance premiums. The legislation also calls for the FDIC to raise the ratio of reserves to deposits from 1.15% to 1.35% for deposit insurance purposes by September 30, 2020 and to “offset the effect” of increased assessments on insured depository institutions with assets of less than $10 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act also limits interchange fees payable on debit card transactions, establishes the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection as an independent entity within the Federal Reserve, which will have broad rulemaking, supervisory and enforcement authority over consumer financial products and services, including deposit products, residential mortgages, home-equity loans and credit cards, and contains provisions on mortgage-related matters such as steering incentives, determinations as to a borrower’s ability to repay and prepayment penalties. The Dodd-Frank Act also includes provisions that affect corporate governance and executive compensation at all publicly-traded companies and allows financial institutions to pay interest on business checking accounts. The legislation also restricts proprietary trading, places restrictions on the owning or sponsoring of hedge and private equity funds, and regulates the derivatives activities of banks and their affiliates.

These provisions, or any other aspects of current or proposed regulatory or legislative changes to laws applicable to the financial industry, if enacted or adopted, may impact the profitability of our business activities or change certain of our business practices, including the ability to offer new products, obtain financing, attract deposits, make loans, and achieve satisfactory interest spreads, and could expose us to additional costs, including increased compliance costs. These changes also may require us to invest significant management attention and resources to make any necessary changes to operations in order to comply, and could therefore also materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS

The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect us.

Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. We have exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and we routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual funds, hedge funds, and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty or client. In addition, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due to us. There can be no assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect our results of operations or earnings.

We have procedures in place to mitigate the impact of a default among our counterparties. We request collateral for most credit exposures with other financial institutions and monitor these on a regular basis. Nonetheless, market volatility could impact the valuation of collateral held by us and result in losses.

Our ability to raise financing is dependent in part on market confidence. In times when market confidence is affected by events related to well-known financial institutions, risk aversion among participants may increase, substantially and make it more difficult to borrow in the credit markets.

We are subject to risk related to our own credit rating.

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are rated by the major rating agencies, as these banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with deposits and secured borrowings. At December 31, 2014, the banking subsidiaries had $19 million in deposits that were subject to rating triggers.

Some of the Corporation’s derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the bank’s well-capitalized status and certain formal regulatory actions. These agreements could require exposure collateralization, early termination or both. The fair value of derivative instruments in a liability position subject to financial covenants approximated $9 million at December 31, 2014, with the Corporation providing collateral totaling $15 million to cover the net liability position with counterparties on these derivative instruments.

 

32


Table of Contents

In addition, certain mortgage servicing and custodial agreements that BPPR has with third parties include rating covenants. In the event of a credit rating downgrade, the third parties have the right to require the institution to engage a substitute cash custodian for escrow deposits and/or increase collateral levels securing the recourse obligations. Also, the Corporation services residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions. Certain contractual agreements require the Corporation to post collateral to secure such recourse obligations if the institution’s required credit ratings are not maintained. Collateral pledged by the Corporation to secure recourse obligations amounted to approximately $92 million at December 31, 2014. The Corporation could be required to post additional collateral under the agreements. Management expects that it would be able to meet additional collateral requirements if and when needed. The requirements to post collateral under certain agreements or the loss of escrow deposits could reduce the Corporation’s liquidity resources and impact its operating results.

Our credit ratings were reduced substantially in 2009, and our senior unsecured ratings are now “non-investment grade” with the three major rating agencies. This may make it more difficult for the Corporation and its subsidiaries to borrow in the capital markets and at a higher cost.

We are subject to default risk in our loan portfolio.

We are subject to the risk of loss from loan defaults and foreclosures with respect to the loans originated or acquired. We establish provisions for loan losses, which lead to reductions in the income from operations, in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level which is deemed appropriate by management based upon an assessment of the quality of the loan portfolio in accordance with established procedures and guidelines. This process, which is critical to our financial results and condition, requires difficult, subjective and complex judgments about the future, including forecasts of economic and market conditions that might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay the loans. There can be no assurance that management has accurately estimated the level of future loan losses or that Popular will not have to increase the provision for loan losses in the future as a result of future increases in non-performing loans or for other reasons beyond our control. Any such increases in our provisions for loan losses or any loan losses in excess of our provisions for loan losses would have an adverse effect on our future financial condition and result of operations. We will continue to evaluate our provision for loan losses and allowance for loan losses and may be required to increase such amounts.

Rating downgrades on the Government of Puerto Rico’s debt obligations could affect the value of our loans to the Government and our portfolio of Puerto Rico Government securities.

In February 2014, the three principal rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) lowered their ratings on the General Obligation bonds of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the bonds of several other Commonwealth instrumentalities to non-investment grade ratings. In connection with their rating actions, the rating agencies noted various factors, including high levels of public debt, the lack of a clear economic growth catalysts, recurring fiscal budget deficits, the financial condition of the public sector employee pension plans and, more recently, liquidity concerns regarding the Commonwealth and the GDB and their ability to access the capital markets.

In June 28, 2014, Governor Alejandro García Padilla signed into law the Puerto Rico Public Corporations Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act (the “ Recovery Act”) which provides a framework for certain public corporations, including the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”), the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority, to restructure their debt obligations in order to ensure that the services they provide to the public are not interrupted. On July 1, 2014, Moody’s, as a consequence to the enactment of the Recovery Act, again downgraded the majority of the Puerto Rico central government and public instrumentalities’ obligations, expressing its concern for all of Puerto Rico’s municipal debt based on the deteriorating fiscal situation on the island and the possibility that application of the new law may further limit the Commonwealth’s ability to access the capital markets. Shortly thereafter, both S&P and Fitch later issued ratings downgrades for various Puerto Rico municipal issuers, including PREPA.

In July 2014, certain holders of PREPA bonds and an investment manager, on behalf of funds which hold PREPA bonds, filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (the “District Court”) seeking a declaratory judgment that the Recovery Act violates several provisions of the United States Constitution. The District Court consolidated the actions. On February 10, 2015, the District Court entered judgment that the Recovery Act is preempted by the federal Bankruptcy Code and is therefore void pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. The District Court permanently enjoined the Commonwealth officers from enforcing the Recovery Act. The Commonwealth has filed a notice of appeal and has indicated that it will continue to defend vigorously the constitutionality of the Recovery Act.

 

33


Table of Contents

On February 10, 2015, the Governor announced a proposal for a new tax code that would replace the current 7% sales and use tax with a 16% value-added tax, while significantly lowering income taxes. The proposal seeks to create a fair and effective system by primarily taxing consumption, rather than productivity, and to increase tax revenues to the government by reducing tax evasion. While legislation for the new tax code has been filed, it is too early to determine what changes will be made during the legislative process and what effect this proposal, if enacted into law, will have on economic activity.

On February 12, 2015, S&P further downgraded the debt rating of the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities. S&P stated that, in their view, Puerto Rico’s current economic and financial trajectory is now more susceptible to adverse financial, economic and market conditions that could ultimately impair the Commonwealth’s ability to fund services and its debt commitments. S&P also cited implementation risk with respect to the value-added tax and expressed concern that, while higher taxes could improve the budget balance, there could be potential negative economic implications. On February 19, 2015, Moody’s also downgraded its debt ratings for the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities, citing similar concerns as S&P.

It is uncertain how the financial markets may react to any potential further ratings downgrade of Puerto Rico’s debt obligations. However, further deterioration in the fiscal situation with possible negative ratings implications, could further adversely affect the value of Puerto Rico’s government obligations.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and its instrumentalities and municipalities amounted to $1.0 billion, of which approximately $811 million is outstanding ($1.2 billion and $950 million at December 31, 2013). Of the amount outstanding, $ 689 million consists of loans and $ 122 million are securities ($789 million and $161 million at December 31, 2013). Of this amount, $336 million represents obligations from the Government of Puerto Rico and public corporations that are either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment ($527 million at December 31, 2013). Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as public utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The remaining $475 million represents obligations from various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment ($423 million at December 31, 2013). These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. These loans have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality.

In addition, at December 31, 2014, the Corporation had $370 million in indirect exposure to loans or securities that are payable by non-governmental entities, but which carry a government guarantee to cover any shortfall in collateral in the event of borrower default ($360 million at December 31, 2013). These included $289 million in residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (December 31, 2013 - $274 million). These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. Also, the Corporation had $49 million in Puerto Rico pass-through housing bonds backed by FNMA, GNMA or residential loans CMO’s, and $32 million of industrial development notes ($52 million and $34 million at December 31, 2013).

We are exposed to credit risk from mortgage loans that have been sold or are being serviced subject to recourse arrangements.

Popular is generally at risk for mortgage loan defaults from the time it funds a loan until the time the loan is sold or securitized into a mortgage-backed security. In the past, we have retained, through recourse arrangements, part of the credit risk on sales of mortgage loans, and we also service certain mortgage loan portfolios with recourse. At December 31, 2014, we serviced $2.1 billion in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and Freddie Mac programs. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, we are required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that we would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. During 2014, we repurchased approximately $89 million in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions. In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, we have rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. As of December 31, 2014, our liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $59 million. We may suffer losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing of the related property.

 

34


Table of Contents

Defective and repurchased loans may harm our business and financial condition.

In connection with the sale and securitization of loans, we are required to make a variety of customary representations and warranties regarding Popular and the loans being sold or securitized. Our obligations with respect to these representations and warranties are generally outstanding for the life of the loan, and they relate to, among other things:

 

   

compliance with laws and regulations;

   

underwriting standards;

   

the accuracy of information in the loan documents and loan file; and

   

the characteristics and enforceability of the loan.

A loan that does not comply with these representations and warranties may take longer to sell, may impact our ability to obtain third party financing for the loan, and be unsalable or salable only at a significant discount. If such a loan is sold before we detect non-compliance, we may be obligated to repurchase the loan and bear any associated loss directly, or we may be obligated to indemnify the purchaser against any loss, either of which could reduce our cash available for operations and liquidity. Management believes that it has established controls to ensure that loans are originated in accordance with the secondary market’s requirements, but mistakes may be made, or certain employees may deliberately violate our lending policies. We seek to minimize repurchases and losses from defective loans by correcting flaws, if possible, and selling or re-selling such loans. We have established specific reserves for probable losses related to repurchases resulting from representations and warranty violations on specific portfolios. At December 31, 2014, Popular’s reserve for estimated losses from representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $21 million, which was included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition. Nonetheless, we do not expect any such losses to be significant, although if they were to occur, they would adversely impact our results of operations or financial condition.

Increases in FDIC insurance premiums may have a material adverse effect on our earnings.

With the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, major changes were introduced to the FDIC deposit insurance system. Under the Dodd- Frank Act, the FDIC now has until the end of September 2020 to bring its reserve ratio to the new statutory minimum of 1.35%. New rules amending the deposit insurance assessment regulations under the requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act have been adopted, including a final rule designating 2% as the designated reserve ratio and a final rule extending temporary unlimited deposit insurance to non-interest bearing transaction accounts maintained in connection with lawyers’ trust accounts. On February 7, 2011, the FDIC adopted regulations effective for the 2011 second quarter assessment and payable in September 2011, which outline significant changes in the risk-based premiums approach for banks with over $10 billion of assets and creates a “Scorecard” system. The “Scorecard” system uses a performance score and loss severity score, which aggregate to an initial base assessment rate. The assessment base also changes from deposits to an institution’s average total assets minus its average tangible equity. For 2014, the FDIC deposit insurance expense of Popular totaled $40 million.

We are generally unable to control the amount of premiums that we are required to pay for FDIC insurance. If there are additional bank or financial institution failures, our level of non-performing assets increase, or our risk profile changes or our capital position is impaired, we may be required to pay even higher FDIC premiums than the recently increased levels. Any future increases or special assessments may materially adversely affect our results of operations.

If our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired, it may adversely affect our financial condition and future results of operations.

As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately $466 million and $31.5 million of goodwill and amortizable intangible assets recorded on our balance sheet related to our Puerto Rico and United States operations, respectively. If our goodwill or amortizable intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings. Under GAAP, we review our amortizable intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually. Factors that may be considered a change in circumstances, indicating that the carrying value of the goodwill or amortizable intangible assets may not be recoverable, include reduced future cash flow estimates and slower growth rates in the industry.

 

35


Table of Contents

During the second quarter of 2014, BPNA entered into definitive agreements to sell its regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida to three different buyers, resulting in the discontinuance of these businesses. In accordance with US GAAP, BPNA allocated a proportionate share of its goodwill balance to the discontinued businesses on a relative fair value basis and performed an impairment test for the goodwill allocated to each of the discontinued operations as well as for retained business, each as a separate reporting unit. This allocation of goodwill and related impairment analysis resulted in an impairment charge of $186.5 million during the second quarter of 2014. The goodwill impairment charge was a non-cash charge that did not have an impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios. The goodwill impairment analysis of the retained portion of the BPNA operations resulted in no impairment as of June 30, 2014.

The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires us to make estimates and assumptions with regards to the fair value of our reporting units. Actual values may differ significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact our results of operations and the reporting unit where the goodwill is recorded. Critical assumptions that are used as part of these evaluations include:

 

   

selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business, location and size;

   

selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions;

   

the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of equity;

   

the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and

   

the market growth and new business assumptions.

We conducted our annual evaluation of goodwill during the third quarter of 2014 using July 31, 2014 as the annual evaluation date. This evaluation is a two- step process. For the BPPR reporting unit, the average estimated fair value calculated in Step 1 using all valuation methodologies exceeded BPPR’s equity value by approximately $337 million in the July 31, 2014 annual test. For BPNA reporting unit, the average estimated fair value calculated in Step 1 using all valuation methodologies exceeded BPNA’s equity value by approximately $205 million in the July 31, 2014 annual test. Accordingly, there was no indication of impairment on the goodwill recorded in BPPR or BPNA at July 31, 2014 and there was no need for a Step 2 analysis.

If we are required to record a charge to earnings in our consolidated financial statements because an impairment of the goodwill or amortizable intangible assets is determined, our results of operations could be adversely affected.

Our business could suffer if we are unable to attract, retain and motivate skilled senior leaders.

Our success depends, in large part, on our ability to retain key senior leaders, and competition for such senior leaders can be intense in most areas of our business. Our compensation practices are subject to review and oversight by the Federal Reserve Board. We also may be subject to limitations on compensation practices by the FDIC or other regulators, which may or may not affect our competitors. Limitations on our compensation practices could have a negative impact on our ability to attract and retain talented senior leaders in support of our long term strategy.

Our compensation practices are subject to oversight by the Federal Reserve Board. Any deficiencies in our compensation practices may be incorporated into our supervisory ratings, which can affect our ability to make acquisitions or perform other actions.

Our compensation practices are subject to oversight by the Federal Reserve Board. In October 2009, the Federal Reserve Board issued a comprehensive proposal on incentive compensation policies that applies to all banking organizations supervised by the Federal Reserve Board, including Popular and our banking subsidiaries. The proposal sets forth three key principles for incentive compensation arrangements that are designed to help ensure that incentive compensation plans do not encourage excessive risk-taking and are consistent with the safety and soundness of banking organizations. The three principles provide that a banking organization’s incentive compensation arrangements should provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the organization’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and be supported by strong corporate governance. The proposal also contemplates a detailed review by the Federal Reserve Board of the incentive compensation policies and practices of a number of “large, complex banking organizations.” Any deficiencies in compensation practices that are identified may be incorporated into the organization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect its ability to make acquisitions or perform other actions. The proposal provides that enforcement actions may be taken against a banking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements or related risk-management control or governance processes pose a risk to the organization’s safety and soundness and the organization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies. Separately, the FDIC has solicited comments on whether to amend its risk-based deposit insurance assessment system to potentially increase assessment rates on financial institutions with compensation programs that put the FDIC deposit insurance fund at risk, and proposed legislation would subject compensation practices at financial institutions to heightened standards and increased scrutiny.

 

36


Table of Contents

The scope and content of the U.S. banking regulators’ policies on executive compensation are continuing to develop and are likely to continue evolving in the near future. It cannot be determined at this time whether compliance with such policies will adversely affect the ability of Popular and our subsidiaries to hire, retain and motivate key employees.

As a holding company, we depend on dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries for liquidity.

We are a bank holding company and depend primarily on dividends from our banking and other operating subsidiaries to fund our cash needs. These obligations and needs include capitalizing subsidiaries, repaying maturing debt and paying debt service on outstanding debt. Our banking subsidiaries, BPPR and BPNA, are limited by law in their ability to make dividend payments and other distributions to us based on their earnings and capital position. A failure by our banking subsidiaries to generate sufficient cash flow to make dividend payments to us may have a negative impact on our results of operation and financial position. Also, a failure by the bank holding company to access sufficient liquidity resources to meet all projected cash needs in the ordinary course of business, may have a detrimental impact on our financial condition and ability to compete in the market.

Actions by the rating agencies or having capital levels below well-capitalized could raise the cost of our obligations, which could affect our ability to borrow or to enter into hedging agreements in the future and may have other adverse effects on our business.

Actions by the rating agencies could raise the cost of our borrowings since lower rated securities are usually required by the market to pay higher rates than obligations of higher credit quality.

The market for non-investment grade securities is much smaller and less liquid than for investment grade securities. Therefore, if we were to attempt to issue preferred stock or debt securities into the capital markets, it is possible that there would not be sufficient demand to complete a transaction and the cost could be substantially higher than for more highly rated securities.

In addition, changes in our ratings and capital levels below well-capitalized could affect our relationships with some creditors and business counterparties. For example, a portion of our hedging transactions include ratings triggers or well-capitalized language that permit counterparties to either request additional collateral or terminate our agreements with them based on our below investment grade ratings. Although we have been able to meet any additional collateral requirements thus far and expect that we would be able to enter into agreements with substitute counterparties if any of our existing agreements were terminated, changes in our ratings or capital levels below well capitalized could create additional costs for our businesses. In addition, servicing, licensing and custodial agreements that we are party to with third parties include ratings covenants. Servicing rights represent a contractual right and not a beneficial ownership interest in the underlying mortgage loans. Upon failure to maintain the required credit ratings, the third parties could have the right to require Popular to engage a substitute fund custodian and/or increase collateral levels securing the recourse obligations. Popular services residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions. Certain contractual agreements require us to post collateral to secure such recourse obligations if our required credit ratings are not maintained. Collateral pledged by us to secure recourse obligations approximated $92 million at December 31, 2014. We could be required to post additional collateral under the agreements. Management expects that we would be able to meet additional collateral requirements if and when needed. The requirements to post collateral under certain agreements or the loss of custodian funds could reduce Popular’s liquidity resources and impact its operating results. The termination of those agreements or the inability to realize servicing income for our businesses could have an adverse effect on those businesses. Other counterparties are also sensitive to the risk of a ratings downgrade and the implications for our businesses and may be less likely to engage in transactions with us, or may only engage in them at a substantially higher cost, if our ratings remain below investment grade.

We are subject to regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and if we fail to meet these guidelines our business and financial condition will be adversely affected.

Under regulatory capital adequacy guidelines, and other regulatory requirements, Popular and our banking subsidiaries must meet guidelines that include quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off balance sheet items, subject to qualitative judgments by regulators regarding components, risk weightings and other factors. If we fail to meet these minimum capital guidelines and other regulatory requirements, our business and financial condition will be materially and adversely affected. If we fail to maintain well-capitalized status under the regulatory framework, or are deemed not well

 

37


Table of Contents

managed under regulatory exam procedures, or if we experience certain regulatory violations, our status as a financial holding company and our related eligibility for a streamlined review process for acquisition proposals, and our ability to offer certain financial products will be compromised and our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Under the Dodd-Frank Act, all financial companies with more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, such as Popular, that are supervised by a primary federal financial regulatory agency, are required to perform an annual stress test. This stress test supports the regulator’s analysis of the adequacy of a banking organization’s capital and is required as part of Popular’s capital management and review. The stress test is performed utilizing a variety of hypothetical stressed economic scenarios dictated by the Federal Reserve Board. If we are deemed to have inadequate capital under the hypothetical scenarios, then our regulator could prohibit us from taking certain capital actions, such as paying dividends, or require us to increase our regulatory capital, including the issuance of common stock that would dilute the ownership of existing shareholders.

The Basel III Capital Rules approved on July 9, 2013 by the U.S. Federal Banking Regulatory Agencies substantially revised the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries. The Basel III Capital Rules revised the definitions and the components of regulatory capital, as well as modified certain asset risk weights and other matters affecting the numerator and denominator in a banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios thus implementing a new more complex methodology to calculate regulatory capital ratios. The implementation of the new methodology will be phased-in over a 4-year period beginning on January 1, 2015.

The need to maintain more capital than has been historically required and calculated under revised standards could limit our business activities, including lending, and our ability to expand, either organically or through acquisitions. It could also depress our return on equity, thereby making it more difficult to earn our cost of capital. Moreover, although these new requirements are being phased-in over time, U.S. federal banking agencies have been taking into account future expectations regarding the ability of banks to meet these new requirements, including under stress conditions, in approving actions that represent uses of capital, such as dividends and acquisitions.

Due to the importance and complexity of the stress test process and new capital rules calculations under Basel III, we have dedicated additional resources to comply with these requirements, however no assurance can be provided that these resources will be deemed sufficient or that we will be deemed to have adequate capital under the hypothetical economic stress scenarios thus affecting our ability to take certain capital actions in the future.

Certain of the provisions contained in our Certificate of Incorporation have the effect of making it more difficult to change the Board of Directors, and may make the Board of Directors less responsive to stockholder control.

Our certificate of incorporation provides that the members of the Board of Directors are divided into three classes as nearly equal as possible. At each annual meeting of stockholders, one-third of the members of the Board of Directors will be elected for a three-year term, and the other directors will remain in office until their three-year terms expire. Therefore, control of the Board of Directors cannot be changed in one year, and at least two annual meetings must be held before a majority of the members of the Board of Directors can be changed. Our certificate of incorporation also provides that a director, or the entire Board of Directors, may be removed by the stockholders only for cause by a vote of at least two -thirds of the combined voting power of the outstanding capital stock entitled to vote for the election of directors. These provisions have the effect of making it more difficult to change the Board of Directors, and may make the Board of Directors less responsive to stockholder control. These provisions also may tend to discourage attempts by third parties to acquire Popular because of the additional time and expense involved and a greater possibility of failure, and, as a result, may adversely affect the price that a potential purchaser would be willing to pay for the capital stock, thereby reducing the amount a stockholder might realize in, for example, a tender offer for our capital stock.

The resolution of significant pending litigation, if unfavorable, could have material adverse financial effects or cause significant reputational harm to us, which in turn could seriously harm our business prospects.

We face legal risks in our businesses, and the volume of claims and amount of damages and penalties claimed in litigation and regulatory proceedings against financial institutions remain high. Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against us could have material adverse financial effects or cause significant reputational harm to us, which in turn could seriously harm our business prospects. For further information relating to our legal risk, see Note 31, “Commitments & Contingencies”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

We and our subsidiaries and affiliates, as well as EVERTEC, conduct business with financial institutions and/or card payment networks operating in countries whose nationals, including some of our customers’ customers, engage in

 

38


Table of Contents

transactions in countries that are the targets of U.S. economic sanctions and embargoes. If we or our subsidiaries or affiliates or EVERTEC are found to have failed to comply with applicable U.S. sanctions laws and regulations in these instances, we could be exposed to fines, sanctions and other penalties or other governmental investigations.

We and our subsidiaries and affiliates, as well as EVERTEC, conduct business with financial institutions and/or card payment networks operating in countries whose nationals, including some of our customers’ customers, engage in transactions in countries that are the target of U.S. economic sanctions and embargoes. As U.S. - based entities, we and our subsidiaries and affiliates, as well as EVERTEC, are obligated to comply with the economic sanctions regulations administered by OFAC. These regulations prohibit U.S.- based entities from entering into or facilitating unlicensed transactions with, for the benefit of, or in some cases involving the property and property interests of, persons, governments or countries designated by the U.S. government under one or more sanctions regimes and also prohibit transactions that provide a benefit that is received in a country designated under one or more sanctions regimes. Failure to comply with U.S. sanctions and embargoes may result in material fines, sanctions or other penalties being imposed on us. In addition, various state and municipal governments, universities and other investors maintain prohibitions or restrictions on investments in companies that do business involving sanctioned countries or entities, and this could adversely affect the market for our securities. For these reasons, we have established risk-based policies and procedures designed to assist us and our personnel in complying with applicable U.S. laws and regulations. EVERTEC has also done this. These policies and procedures employ software to screen transactions for evidence of sanctioned-country and persons involvement. Consistent with a risk-based approach and the difficulties in identifying all transactions of our customers’ customers that may involve a sanctioned country, there can be no assurance that our policies and procedures will prevent us from violating applicable U.S. laws and regulations in transactions in which we engage, and such violations could adversely affect our reputation, business, financial condition and results of operations.

From time to time we have identified and voluntarily self-disclosed to OFAC transactions that were not timely identified and blocked by our policies and procedures for screening transactions that might violate the economic sanctions regulations administered by OFAC. Although OFAC’s response to our recent voluntary self-disclosures of these apparent violations has been to issue cautionary letters to us, there can be no assurances that our failures to comply with U.S. sanctions and embargoes may result in material fines, sanctions or other penalties being imposed on us.

We have agreed to indemnify EVERTEC for certain claims or damages related to the economic sanctions regulations administered by OFAC. We cannot predict the timing, total costs or ultimate outcome of any OFAC review, or to what extent, if at all, we could be subject to indemnification claims, fines, sanctions or other penalties.

RISKS RELATED TO THE FDIC-ASSISTED TRANSACTION

Risks Related to the FDIC-assisted Transaction.

On April 30, 2010, we entered into an FDIC-assisted transaction involving Westernbank, which could present additional risks to our business. In that transaction, BPPR acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Westernbank from the FDIC in an assisted transaction. Although this transaction provides for FDIC assistance to BPPR to mitigate certain risks, such as sharing exposure to loan losses (80% of the losses for a specified period in substantially all the acquired portfolio will be borne by the FDIC) and providing indemnification against certain liabilities of the former Westernbank, we are still subject to some of the same risks we would face in acquiring another bank in a negotiated transaction. Such risks include risks associated with maintaining customer relationships and failure to realize the anticipated acquisition benefits in the amounts and within the timeframes we expect. In addition, because the FDIC-assisted transaction was structured in a manner that did not allow bidders the time and access to information normally associated with preparing for and evaluating a negotiated transaction, we may face additional risks in the FDIC-assisted transaction.

The success of the FDIC-assisted transaction will depend on a number of uncertain factors.

The success of the FDIC-assisted transaction will depend on a number of factors, including, without limitation:

    our ability to limit the outflow of deposits held by our new customers in the acquired branches and to successfully retain and manage interest-earning assets (i.e., loans) acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction;
    our ability to attract new deposits and to generate new interest-earning assets in the areas previously served by the former Westernbank branches;

 

39


Table of Contents
    our ability to control the incremental non-interest expense from the former Westernbank branches and other units in a manner that enables us to maintain a favorable overall efficiency ratio;
    our ability to collect on the loans acquired and satisfy the standard requirements imposed in the loss sharing agreements; and
    our ability to earn acceptable levels of interest and non-interest income, including fee income, from the acquired branches.

The FDIC-assisted transaction increased BPPR’s commercial real estate and construction loan portfolio, which have a greater credit risk than residential mortgage loans.

With the acquisition of most of the former Westernbank’s loan portfolio, the commercial real estate loan and construction loan portfolios represent a larger portion of BPPR’s total loan portfolio than prior to the FDIC-assisted transaction. This type of lending is generally considered to have more complex credit risks than traditional single-family residential or consumer lending, because the principal is concentrated in a limited number of loans with repayment dependent on the successful operation or completion of the related real estate or construction project. Consequently, these loans are more sensitive to the current adverse conditions in the real estate market and the general economy. These loans are generally less predictable, more difficult to evaluate and monitor, and their collateral may be more difficult to dispose of in a market decline. Furthermore, since these loans are to Puerto Rico based borrowers, Popular’s credit exposure concentration in Puerto Rico increased as a result of the acquisition. Although, the negative economic aspects of these risks are substantially reduced as a result of the FDIC loss sharing agreements, changes in national and local economic conditions could lead to higher loan charge-offs in connection with the FDIC-assisted transaction all of which would not be totally supported by the loss sharing agreements with the FDIC.

We acquired significant portfolios of loans in the FDIC-assisted transaction. Although these loan portfolios were initially accounted for at fair value, there is no assurance that there will not be additional charge-offs to this portfolio. The fluctuations in national, regional and local economic conditions, including those related to local residential, commercial real estate and construction markets, may increase the level of charge-offs that we make to our loan portfolio, and consequently, reduce our net income, and may also increase the level of charge-offs on the loan portfolio that we have acquired and correspondingly reduce our net income. These fluctuations are not predictable, cannot be controlled and may have a material adverse impact on our operations and financial condition even if other favorable events occur.

Although we have entered into loss sharing agreements with the FDIC which provide that 80% of losses related to specified loan portfolios that we have acquired in connection with the FDIC-assisted transaction will be borne by the FDIC, we are not protected for all losses resulting from charge-offs with respect to those specified loan portfolios. Additionally, the loss sharing agreements have limited terms; therefore, any charge-off of related losses that we experience after the term of the loss sharing agreements will not be reimbursed by the FDIC and will negatively impact our results of operations. The loss sharing agreements also impose standard requirements on us which must be satisfied in order to retain loss share protections. The FDIC has the right to refuse or delay payment for loan losses if the loss sharing agreements are not managed in accordance with their terms.

Our decisions regarding the fair value of assets acquired could be inaccurate and our estimated loss share indemnification asset in the FDIC-assisted transaction may be inaccurate, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and future prospects.

Management makes various assumptions and judgments about the collectability of acquired loan portfolios, including the creditworthiness of borrowers and the value of the real estate and other assets serving as collateral for the repayment of secured loans. In the FDIC-assisted transaction, we recorded a loss share indemnification asset that we consider adequate to absorb future losses which may occur in the acquired loan portfolio. In determining the size of the loss share indemnification asset, we analyze the loan portfolio based on historical loss experience, volume and classification of loans, volume and trends in delinquencies and nonaccruals, local economic conditions, and other pertinent information. If our assumptions are incorrect, our actual losses could be higher than estimated and increased loss reserves may be needed to respond to different economic conditions or adverse developments in the acquired loan portfolio. Any increase in future loan losses could have a negative effect on our operating results. However, in the event expected losses from the Westernbank portfolio were to increase more than originally expected prior to the expiration of the applicable loss share periods, the related increase in loss reserves would be largely offset by higher than expected indemnity payments from the FDIC. To the extent that estimated losses on the Westernbank portfolio are not realized before the expiration of the loss sharing agreements (June 30, 2015 for the commercial loss share agreement and June 30, 2015 for the single-family loss share agreement), such losses would not be subject to reimbursement

 

40


Table of Contents

from the FDIC and, accordingly, would require us to make a material adjustment to the value of our loss share indemnification asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

Refer to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction section in the Annual Report for additional information on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, including the accounting for assets acquired and liabilities assumed as well as information on the breakdown and accounting of the acquired loan portfolio.

Our ability to obtain reimbursement under the loss sharing agreements on covered assets depends on our compliance with the terms of the loss sharing agreements.

The loss share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow to receive reimbursement on losses from the FDIC. Under the loss share agreements, BPPR must:

 

    manage and administer the covered assets and collect and effect charge-offs and recoveries with respect to such covered assets in a manner consistent with its usual and prudent business and banking practices and, with respect to single family shared-loss loans, the procedures (including collection procedures) customarily employed by BPPR in servicing and administering mortgage loans for its own account and the servicing procedures established by FNMA or FHLMC, as in effect from time to time, and in accordance with accepted mortgage servicing practices of prudent lending institutions;

 

    exercise its best judgment in managing, administering and collecting amounts on covered assets and effecting charge-offs with respect to the covered assets;

 

    use commercially reasonable efforts to maximize recoveries with respect to losses on single family shared-loss assets and best efforts to maximize collections with respect to commercial shared-loss assets;

 

    retain sufficient staff to perform the duties under the loss share agreements;

 

    adopt and implement accounting, reporting, record-keeping and similar systems with respect to the commercial shared-loss assets;

 

    comply with the terms of the modification guidelines approved by the FDIC or another federal agency for any single-family shared loss loan;

 

    provide notice with respect to proposed transactions pursuant to which a third party or affiliate will manage, administer or collect any commercial shared-loss assets; and

 

    file monthly and quarterly certificates with the FDIC specifying the amount of losses, charge-offs and recoveries.

Under the loss share agreements, BPPR is also required to maintain books and records sufficient to ensure and document compliance with the terms of the loss share agreements.

Under the terms of the loss share agreements, BPPR is also required to deliver certain certificates regarding compliance with the terms of each of the loss share agreements and the computations required thereunder. The required terms of the agreements are extensive and failure to comply with any of the guidelines could result in a specific asset or group of assets permanently losing their loss sharing coverage. BPPR believes that it has complied with the terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets. No assurances can be given that we will manage the covered assets in such a way as to always maintain loss share coverage on all such assets and fully recover the value of our loss share asset.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2010 through March 31, 2012, BPPR received reimbursement for loss-share claims submitted to the FDIC, including charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. When BPPR submitted its shared-loss claim in connection with the June 30, 2012 quarter, however, the FDIC refused to reimburse BPPR for a portion of the claim because of a

 

41


Table of Contents

difference related to the methodology for the computation of charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO. In accordance with the terms of the commercial loss share agreement, BPPR applied a methodology for charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans that conforms to its regulatory supervisory criteria and is calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. The FDIC stated that it believed that BPPR should use a different methodology for those charge-offs. Notwithstanding the FDIC’s refusal to reimburse BPPR for certain shared-loss claims, BPPR continued to calculate shared-loss claims for quarters subsequent to June 30, 2012 in accordance with its charge-off policy for non-covered assets.

BPPR’s loss share agreements with the FDIC specify that disputes can be submitted to arbitration before a review board under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. On July 31, 2013, BPPR filed a statement of claims with the American Arbitration Association requesting that the review board determine certain matters relating to the loss-share claims under its commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC, including that the review board award BPPR the amounts owed under its unpaid quarterly certificates. The statement of claim also included requests for reimbursement of certain valuation adjustments for discounts to appraised values, costs to sell troubled assets and other items. The review board was comprised of one arbitrator appointed by BPPR, one arbitrator appointed by the FDIC and a third arbitrator selected by agreement of those arbitrators.

On October 17, 2014, BPPR and the FDIC settled all claims and counterclaims that had been submitted to the review board. The settlement provides for an agreed valuation methodology for reimbursement of charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and resulting OREO. Although the terms of the settlement could delay the timing of reimbursement of certain loss-share claims from the FDIC, the settlement is not expected to have a material adverse impact on BPPR’s current estimate of expected reimbursable losses for the covered portfolio through the end of the commercial loss share agreement in the quarter ending June 30, 2015.

As of December 31, 2014, BPPR had unreimbursed losses and expenses of $299.4 million under the commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC. On January 16, 2015, BPPR received reimbursement of $130.2 million from the FDIC covering claims filed prior to December 31, 2014. Taking into consideration this payment and claims submitted through that date, the total unreimbursed losses totaled $169.2 million, of which $30.1 million was submitted to the FDIC on January 30, 2015. BPPR continues to work on processing claims, including those which had previously not been reimbursed by the FDIC and expects to complete this process before the expiration of BPPR’s ability to submit claims under the commercial loss share agreement in the quarter ending June 30, 2015. After giving effect to the claim submitted on January 30, 2015, the amount of claims pending to be submitted for reimbursement to the FDIC amounted to $139.1 million.

On November 25, 2014, the FDIC notified BPPR that it (a) would not reimburse BPPR under the commercial loss share agreement for a $66.6 million loss claim on eight related real estate loans that BPPR restructured and consolidated (collectively, the “Disputed Asset”), and (b) would no longer treat the Disputed Asset as a “Shared-Loss Asset” under the commercial loss share agreement. The FDIC alleged that BPPR’s restructure and modification of the underlying loans did not constitute a “Permitted Amendment” under the commercial loss share agreement, thereby causing the bank to breach Article III of the commercial loss share agreement.

BPPR disagrees with the FDIC’s determinations relating to the Disputed Asset, and accordingly, on December 19, 2014, delivered to the FDIC a notice of dispute under the commercial loss share agreement.

The commercial loss share agreement provides that certain disputes be submitted to arbitration before a review board, to include two party-appointed members, under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. BPPR and the FDIC have agreed that, if they are not able to resolve their disputes concerning the Disputed Asset through negotiation prior to March 13, 2015, they will name their respective party-appointed members of the review board on March 16, 2015.

To the extent we are not able to successfully resolve this matter through negotiation or the arbitration process described above, a write-off in the amount of approximately $53.3 million of the aforementioned pending claims would be recorded.

In addition, in November and December 2014, BPPR proposed separate portfolio sales to the FDIC. The FDIC has refused to consent to either sale, stating that those sales did not represent best efforts to maximize collections on shared-loss assets under the commercial loss share agreement. We dispute that characterization, and negotiations are continuing.

 

42


Table of Contents

No assurance can be given that we will receive reimbursement from the FDIC with respect to the foregoing items, which could require us to make a material adjustment to the value of our loss share asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

RISKS RELATED TO ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN ASSETS AND DEPOSITS OF DORAL BANK FROM THE FDIC AS RECEIVER

Our recent acquisition of certain assets and deposits of Doral Bank from the FDIC as receiver could magnify certain of the risks our business already faces and could present new risks.

On February 27, 2015, BPPR, in an alliance with co-bidders, including BPNA, acquired certain assets and all deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Acquisition of Certain Assets and Deposits of Doral Bank from the FDIC as Receiver” for a description of the transaction. The transaction could magnify certain of the risks our business already faces that are described in these “Risk Factors” and could present new risks, including the following:

 

   

risks associated with weak economic conditions in the economy and in the real estate markets in our geographic footprint, which adversely affect real estate prices, the job market, consumer confidence and spending habits, which may affect, among other things, the continued status of the loans we acquired as performing assets, charge-offs and provision expense;

 

   

risks associated with maintaining customer relationships, including managing any potential customer confusion caused by the alliance structure;

 

   

risks associated with the limited amount of diligence able to be conducted by a buyer in an FDIC transaction;

 

   

changes in interest rates and market liquidity which may reduce interest margins;

 

   

changes in market rates and prices that may adversely impact the value of financial assets and liabilities;

 

   

difficulties in converting or integrating the Doral branches or difficulties in providing transition support to alliance co-bidders;

 

   

transaction expenses exceeding our estimates of between $20 and $25 million; and

 

   

failure to realize the anticipated acquisition benefits in the amounts and within the timeframes we expect, including failure to meet our expectation that the transaction is accretive within the first 12 months.

RISKS RELATING TO AN INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES

Potential issuance of additional shares of our Common Stock could further dilute existing holders of our Common Stock.

The potential issuance of additional shares of our Common Stock or common equivalent securities in future equity offerings would dilute the ownership interest of our existing common stockholders.

Dividends on our Common Stock and Preferred Stock have been or may be suspended and stockholders may not receive funds in connection with their investment in our Common Stock or Preferred Stock without selling their shares.

Holders of our Common Stock and Preferred Stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our Board of Directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. During 2009, we suspended dividend payments on our Common Stock and Preferred Stock. In December 2010, we resumed payment of dividends on our Preferred Stock. There can be no assurance that any dividends will be declared on the Preferred Stock in any future periods.

This could adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock. Also, we are a bank holding company and our ability to declare and pay dividends is dependent on certain Federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board regarding capital adequacy and dividends. Moreover, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have issued policy statements stating that the bank holding companies and insured banks should generally pay dividends only out of current operating earnings. In the current financial and economic environment, the Federal Reserve Board has indicated that bank holding companies should carefully review their dividend policy and has discouraged dividend pay-out ratios that are at the 100% or higher level unless both asset quality and capital are very strong.

In addition, the terms of our outstanding junior subordinated debt securities held by each trust that has issued trust preferred securities, prohibit us from declaring or paying any dividends or distributions on our capital stock, including our Common Stock and Preferred Stock or from purchasing, acquiring, or making a liquidation payment on such stock, if we have given notice of our election to defer interest payments but the related deferral period has not yet commenced or a deferral period is continuing.

Accordingly, shareholders may have to sell some or all of their shares of our Common Stock or Preferred Stock in order to generate cash flow from their investment. Shareholders may not realize a gain on their investment when they sell the Common Stock or Preferred Stock and may lose the entire amount of their investment.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR OPERATIONS

Cyber-attacks, system risks and data protection breaches could present significant reputational, legal and regulatory costs.

Popular is under continuous threat of cyber-attacks especially as we continue to expand customer services via the internet and other remote service channels. The most significant cyber–attack risks that we may face are e-fraud, denial-of-service and computer intrusion that might result in loss of sensitive customer data. Loss from e-fraud occurs when cybercriminals breach and extract funds from customer or bank accounts. Denial-of-service disrupts services available to our customers through our on-line banking system. Computer intrusion attempts might result in the breach of sensitive customer data, such as account numbers and social security numbers, and could present significant reputational, legal and/or regulatory costs to Popular if successful. Our risk and exposure to these matters remains heightened because of the evolving nature and complexity of the threats from organized cybercriminals and hackers, and our plans to continue to provide e-banking and mobile banking services to our customers. We have not, to date, experienced any material losses as a result of cyber-attacks.

If personal, non-public, confidential or proprietary information of customers in our possession were to be mishandled or misused, we could suffer significant regulatory consequences, reputational damage and financial loss. Such mishandling or misuse could include, for example, if such information were erroneously provided to parties who are not permitted to have the information, either by fault of our systems, employees, or counterparties, or where such information is intercepted or otherwise inappropriately taken by third parties.

 

43


Table of Contents

We rely on other companies to provide key components of our business infrastructure.

Third parties provide key components of our business operations such as data processing, information security, recording and monitoring transactions, online banking interfaces and services, Internet connections and network access. While we have selected these third party vendors carefully, we do not control their actions. Any problems caused by these third parties, including those resulting from disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle current or higher volumes, failure of a vendor to provide services for any reason or poor performance of services, failure of a vendor to notify us of a reportable event, could adversely affect our ability to deliver products and services to our customers and otherwise conduct our business. Financial or operational difficulties of a third party vendor could also hurt our operations if those difficulties interfere with the vendor’s ability to serve us. Replacing these third party vendors could also create significant delay and expense. Accordingly, use of such third parties creates an unavoidable inherent risk to our business operations.

Hurricanes and other weather-related events, as well as man-made disasters, could cause a disruption in our operations or other consequences that could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

A significant portion of our operations are located in a region susceptible to hurricanes. Such weather events can cause disruption to our operations and could have a material adverse effect on our overall results of operations. We maintain hurricane insurance, including coverage for lost profits and extra expense; however, there is no insurance against the disruption to the markets that we serve that a catastrophic hurricane could produce. Further, a hurricane in any of our market areas could adversely impact the ability of borrowers to timely repay their loans and may adversely impact the value of any collateral held by us. Man-made disasters and other events connected with the region in which we are located could have similar effects. The severity and impact of future hurricanes and other weather-related events are difficult to predict and may be exacerbated by global climate change. The effects of past or future hurricanes and other weather-related events could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

For further information of other risks faced by Popular please refer to the Management’s Discussion & Analysis section of the Annual Report.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

As of December 31, 2014, BPPR owned and wholly or partially occupied approximately 63 branch premises and other facilities throughout Puerto Rico. It also owned 6 parking garage buildings and approximately 36 lots held for future development or for parking facilities also in Puerto Rico, one building in the U.S. Virgin Islands and one in the British Virgin Islands. In addition, as of such date, BPPR leased properties mainly for branch operations in approximately 113 locations in Puerto Rico and 7 locations in the U.S. Virgin Islands. At December 31, 2014, BPNA had 94 offices (principally bank branches) of which 16 were owned and 78 were leased. These offices were located in New York, New Jersey and Florida. Also, the Corporation has a leased six story office building in Rosemont, Illinois that was the site of BPNA’s headquarters and is expected to be vacated in 2015, as part of BPNA’s reorganization. Our management believes that each of our facilities are well maintained and suitable for its purpose. The principal properties owned by Popular for banking operations and other services are described below:

Popular Center , the twenty-story BPPR headquarters building, located at 209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. In addition, it has an adjacent parking garage with capacity for approximately 1,095 cars. BPPR operates a full service branch at the plaza level and our centralized units and subsidiaries occupy approximately 50% of the office floors space. Approximately 48% of the office and commercial spaces are leased to outside tenants and 2% is available for office and retail use.

Popular Center North Building , a five-story building, on the same block as Popular Center. These facilities are connected to the main building by the parking garage and to the Popular Street building by a pedestrian bridge. It provides office space and parking for 100 cars. It also houses six movie theatres with stadium type seating for approximately 600 persons.

Popular Street Building, a parking and office building located at Ponce de León Avenue and Popular Street, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. The six stories of office space and the basement are occupied by BPPR units and the Corporate Credit Risk Division. At the ground level, Popular Auto occupies approximately 10% of the retail type space and the remaining spaces are leased or available for leasing to outside tenants. It has parking facilities for approximately 1,165 cars.

 

44


Table of Contents

Cupey Center Complex , one building, three stories high, and three buildings, two stories high each, located in Cupey, Río Piedras, Puerto Rico. This building is leased to EVERTEC. BPPR maintains a full service branch and some support services in these facilities. The Complex also includes a parking garage building with capacity for approximately 1,000 cars and houses a recreational center for employees.

Stop 22 Building , a twelve story structure located in Santurce, Puerto Rico. A BPPR branch, the Our People Division, the Asset Protection Division, the Auditing Division and the International Banking Center and Foreign Exchange Department are the main occupants of this facility.

Centro Europa Building , a seven-story office and retail building in Santurce, Puerto Rico. The BPPR’s training center and loss mitigation unit occupies approximately 38% of this building. The remaining space is leased or available for leasing to outside tenants. The building also includes a parking garage with capacity for approximately 613 cars.

Old San Juan Building , a twelve-story structure located in Old San Juan, Puerto Rico. BPPR occupies approximately 36% of the building for a branch operation, an exhibition room and other facilities. The rest of the building is leased or available for leasing to outside tenants.

Guaynabo Corporate Office Park Building , a two-story building located in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico. This building is fully occupied by Popular Insurance, Inc. as its headquarters. The property also includes an adjacent four-level parking garage with capacity for approximately 300 cars, a potable water cistern and a diesel storage tank.

Altamira Building , a nine-story office building located in Guaynabo, Puerto Rico. A seven-level parking garage with capacity for approximately 550 cars is also part of this property that houses the centralized offices Popular Auto, LLC. It also includes a full service branch and BPPR mortgage loans and servicing units.

El Señorial Center , a four-story office building and a two-story branch building located in Río Piedras, Puerto Rico. The property also includes an eight-level parking garage adjacent to the office building and four-levels of underground parking in the branch building, which together with the available ground parking space, provide for approximately 977 automobiles. As of December 31, 2014, a BPPR branch and the Río Piedras regional office operate in the branch building while a number of centralized BPPR offices occupy the main building. The Customer Contact Center and the Operations, Comptroller, Retail Credit Products and Services, and Card Products divisions are some of its occupants.

Ponce de León 167 Building , a five-story office building located in Hato Rey, Puerto Rico. As of December 19, 2014, the building is quarters of Fundación Banco Popular wish occupy 100% of the building.

BPPR Virgin Islands Center , a three-story building located in St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands housing a BPPR branch and centralized offices. The building is fully occupied by BPPR personnel.

Popular Center -Tortola , a four-story building located in Tortola, British Virgin Islands. A BPPR branch is located in the first story while the commercial credit department occupies the second story. Part of the third floor has been leased to an outside tenant while the remaining space is reserved for BPPR V.I. Region’s expansion. The fourth floor is available for outside tenants.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a discussion of Legal proceedings, see Note 31, “Commitments and Contingencies”, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Common Stock

Popular’s Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “BPOP”. On May 29, 2012, the Corporation completed a 1-for-10 reverse split of its common stock, $0.01 par value per share. Pursuant to the reverse stock

 

45


Table of Contents

split, each ten shares of authorized and outstanding common stock have been reclassified and combined into one new share of common stock. In connection with the reverse stock split, the number of shares of common stock authorized under the Corporation’s Restated Certificate of Incorporation was reduced from 1,700,000,000 to 170,000,000 shares, without any change in par value per common share. The reverse split did not change the number of shares of the Corporation’s preferred stock authorized, which remains at 30,000,000. All per share information presented in this Form10-K has been adjusted to reflect the reverse stock split.

Information concerning the range of high and low sales prices for the Common Stock for each quarterly period during 2014 and the previous four years, as well as cash dividends declared, is contained under Table 4, “Common Stock Performance”, in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the Annual Report, and is incorporated herein by reference.

In June 2009, Popular announced the suspension of dividends on the Common Stock. Popular has no current plans to resume dividend payments on the Common Stock. The Common Stock ranks junior to all series of Preferred Stock as to dividend rights and/or as to rights on liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Popular. Our ability to declare or pay dividends on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, the Common Stock is subject to certain restrictions in the event that Popular fails to pay or set aside full dividends on the Preferred Stock for the latest dividend period.

Additional information concerning legal or regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends by Popular, BPPR and BPNA is contained under the caption “Regulation and Supervision” in Item 1 herein.

As of February 23, 2015, Popular had 8,853 stockholders of record of the Common Stock, not including beneficial owners whose shares are held in record names of brokers or other nominees. The last sales price for the Common Stock on that date was $33.08 per share.

Preferred Stock

Popular has 30,000,000 shares of authorized Preferred Stock that may be issued in one or more series, and the shares of each series shall have such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors when authorizing the issuance of that particular series. Popular’s Preferred Stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 consisted of:

885,726 shares of 6.375% non-cumulative monthly income Preferred Stock, Series A, no par value, liquidation preference value of $25 per share.

1,120,665 shares of 8.25% non-cumulative monthly income Preferred Stock, Series B, no par value, liquidation preference value of $25 per share.

All series of Preferred Stock are pari passu.

Dividends on each series of Preferred Stock are payable if declared by our Board of Directors. Our ability to declare and pay dividends on the preferred stock is dependent on certain Federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve Board regarding capital adequacy and dividends. The Board of Directors is not obligated to declare dividends and dividends do not accumulate in the event they are not paid.

In June 2009, Popular announced the suspension of dividends on its Series A and B Preferred Stock. On December 21, 2010, Popular announced that its Board of Directors declared monthly cash dividends of $0.1328125 per share of 6.375% non-cumulative monthly income Preferred Stock, Series A, and of $0.171875 per share of 8.25% non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, Series B, paid on December 31, 2010 to holders of record as of December 28, 2010.

In connection with the resumption of payment of monthly dividends on the Preferred Stock, which amounted $3.7 million for 2014, Popular has committed to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System to fund the dividend payments out of newly-issued Common Stock issued to employees under Popular’s existing savings and investment plans or, if such issuances are insufficient, other common equity capital raised by Popular. During 2014 the Common Stock issued under those plans was $5.4 million that was well above the dividend payment. There can be no assurance that any dividends will be declared on the Preferred Stock in any future periods.

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

Popular offers a dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan for our stockholders that allows them to reinvest their dividends in shares of the Common Stock at a 5% discount from the average market price at the time of the issuance, as well as purchase shares of Common Stock directly from Popular by making optional cash payments at prevailing market prices. No shares will be sold directly by us to participants in the dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan at less than the par value of our Common Stock. No additional shares were issued under the dividend reinvestment plan during 2014.

 

46


Table of Contents

Equity Based Plans

For information about the securities authorized for issuance under our equity based plans, refer to Part III, Item 12.

In April 2004, our shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The maximum number of shares of Common Stock issuable under this Plan is 3,500,000.

The following table sets forth the details of purchases of Common Stock during the quarter ended December 31, 2014 under the 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Not in thousands          

 

Period    Total Number of
Shares Purchased
  

Average Price Paid

per Share

   Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or Programs
  

 

Maximum Number of

Shares that May Yet be
Purchased Under the

Plans or Programs

 

October 1 – October 31

   130,719    $30.41    -      -  

November 1 – November 30

   2,084    32.15    -      -  

December 1 – December 31

   -      -      -      -  

 

Total December 31, 2014

   132,803    $30.44    -      -  

 

Equity Compensation Plans

For information about our equity compensation plans, refer to Part III, Item 12.

Stock Performance Graph (1)

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return during the measurement period with the cumulative total return, assuming reinvestment of dividends, of the Nasdaq Bank Index and the Nasdaq Composite Index.

The cumulative total stockholder return was obtained by dividing (i) the cumulative amount of dividends per share, assuming dividend reinvestment since the measurement point, December 31, 2009, plus (ii) the change in the per share price since the measurement date, by the share price at the measurement date.

 

47


Table of Contents

COMPARISON OF FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE RETURN

Total Return as of December 31

            December 31, 2009 = 100

 

LOGO

(1) Unless Popular specifically states otherwise, this Stock Performance Graph shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference and shall not constitute soliciting material or otherwise be considered filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The information required by this item appears in Table 1, “Selected Financial Data”, and the text under the caption “Statement of Operations Analysis” in the Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Our ratio of earnings to fixed charges and of earnings to fixed charges and Preferred Stock dividends on a consolidated basis for each of the last five years is as follows:

 

      Year ended December 31,

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges:

   2014 (1)      2013      2012      2011      2010  

Including Interest on Deposits

   (A)    2.0    1.4    1.5    1.4

Excluding Interest on Deposits

   (A)    2.7    1.8    2.0    1.7
                          

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends:

 

                        

Including Interest on Deposits

   (A)    2.0    1.4    1.4    1.4

Excluding Interest on Deposits

   (A)    2.6    1.8    1.9    1.7

 

(1)

The computation of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends excludes the results of discontinued operations.

 

(A)

During 2014, earnings were not sufficient to cover fixed charges or preferred stock dividends and the ratios were less than 1:1. The Corporation would have to generate additional earnings of approximately $161 million to achieve ratios of 1:1 in the corresponding period of 2014.

 

48


Table of Contents

For purposes of computing these consolidated ratios, earnings represent income before income taxes, plus fixed charges. Fixed charges represent all interest expense and capitalized (ratios are presented both excluding and including interest on deposits), the portion of net rental expense, which is deemed representative of the interest factor and the amortization of debt issuance expense. The interest expense includes changes in the fair value of the non-hedging derivatives.

Our long-term senior debt and Preferred Stock on a consolidated basis as of December 31 of each of the last five years is:

 

      Year ended December 31,
(in thousands)    2014    2013    2012    2011    2010

Long-term obligations

   $ 1,711,828      $ 1,584,754      $ 1,777,721      $ 1,856,372      $ 4,170,183  

Non-cumulative Preferred Stock

   50,160    50,160    50,160    50,160    50,160

Fixed rate cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock

                        

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The information required by this item appears in the Annual Report under the caption Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Table 30, “Maturity Distribution of Earning Assets”, in the Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, takes into consideration prepayment assumptions as determined by management based on the expected interest rate scenario.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The information regarding the market risk of our investments appears under the caption “Risk Management” in the Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Annual Report, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information required by this item appears in the Annual Report under the caption “Statistical Summaries” in the Annual Report, and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by Popular in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act and such information is accumulated and communicated to management, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

49


Table of Contents

Assessment on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The information under the captions “Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” and “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” are located in our Annual Report and are incorporated by reference herein.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended on December 31, 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information contained under the captions “Shares Beneficially Owned by Directors and Executive Officers of the Corporation”, “Section 16 (A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”, “Corporate Governance”, “Nominees for Election as Directors and Other Directors” and “Executive Officers” in the Proxy Statement are incorporated herein by reference. The Board has adopted a Code of Ethics to be followed by our employees, officers (including the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Comptroller) and directors to achieve conduct that reflects our ethical principles. The Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.popular.com. We will post on our website any amendments to the Code of Ethics or any waivers to the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or directors.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information under the captions “Compensation of Directors”, “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Executive Compensation Program”, including the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDERS MATTERS

The information under the captions “Principal Stockholders” and “Shares Beneficially Owned by Directors and Executive Officers of the Corporation” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

The following table set forth information as of December 31, 2014 regarding securities issued and issuable to directors and eligible employees under our equity based compensation plans.

Plan Category

  

Plan

  

Number of
Securities

to be Issued

Upon Exercise

of Outstanding

Options

    

Weighted Average

Exercise Price of

Outstanding

Options

    

 

Number of Securities)

Remaining Available

for Future Issuance

Under Equity Compensation

Plans (Excluding Securities

Reflected in the First Column)

 
   2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan      44,797        $272.00        2,121,181  

 

 

Total

        44,797        $272.00        2,121,181  

 

 

 

50


Table of Contents

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

The information under the caption “Board of Directors Independence”, “Family Relationships” and “Other Relationships, Transactions and Events” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information regarding principal accountant fees and services is set forth under “Disclosure of Auditors Fees” in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a). The following financial statements and reports included on pages 105 through 255 of the Financial Review and Supplementary Information of Popular’s Annual Report to Shareholders are incorporated herein by reference:

 

(1)

Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2014 and 2013

Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(2) Financial Statement Schedules: No schedules are presented because the information is not applicable or is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements described in (a).1 above or in the notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

The exhibits listed on the Exhibits Index on page 55 of this report are filed herewith or are incorporated herein by reference.

 

51


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 2, 2015.

 

             POPULAR, INC.                                                      
       (Registrant)                                                   
   

By:

   S/ RICHARD L. CARRIÓN
       Richard L. Carrión
       Chairman of the Board
       and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

S/ RICHARD L. CARRIÓN    Chairman of the Board,  
Richard L. Carrión    Chief Executive Officer and  
   Principal Executive Officer   03-02-15
S/ CARLOS J. VÁZQUEZ    Principal Financial Officer   03-02-15
Carlos J. Vázquez     
Executive Vice President     
S/ JORGE J. GARCÍA    Principal Accounting Officer   03-02-15
Jorge J. García     
Senior Vice President and Comptroller     
S/ ALEJANDRO M.BALLESTER     
Alejandro M. Ballester    Director   03-02-15
S/ MARÍA LUISA FERRÉ     
María Luisa Ferré    Director   03-02-15
S/ C. KIM GOODWIN     
C. Kim Goodwin    Director   03-02-15
S/ JOAQUÍN E. BACARDÍ, III     
Joaquín E. Bacardi, III    Director   03-02-15
S/ WILLIAM J. TEUBER JR     
William J. Teuber Jr.    Director   03-02-15
S/ CARLOS A. UNANUE     
Carlos A. Unanue    Director   03-02-15
S/ JOHN W. DIERCKSEN     
John W. Diercksen    Director   03-02-15
S/ DAVID E. GOEL     
David E. Goel    Director   03-02-15

 

52


Table of Contents

Exhibit Index

 

2.1

  

Purchase and Assumption Agreement; Whole Bank; All Deposits, among the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, receiver of Westernbank, Mayaguez Puerto Rico, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, dated as of April 30, 2010. The Purchase and Assumption Agreement includes as Exhibit 4.15A the Single Family Shared Loss Agreement and as Exhibit 4.15B the Commercial Shared- Loss Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2010 and filed on May 6, 2010).

2.2

  

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of June 30, 2010, among Popular, Inc., AP Carib Holdings Ltd., Carib Acquisition, Inc. and EVERTEC, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2010 and filed on July 8, 2010).

2.3

  

Second Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 8, 2010, among Popular, Inc., EVERTEC, Inc., AP Carib Holdings, Ltd. and Carib Acquisition, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 8, 2010 and filed on August 12, 2010).

2.4

  

Third Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 15, 2010, among Popular, Inc., EVERTEC, Inc., AP Carib Holdings, Ltd. And Carib Acquisition, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8- K dated September 15, 2010 and filed on September 21, 2010).

2.5

  

Fourth Amendment to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of September 30, 2010, among Popular, Inc., EVERTEC, Inc., AP Carib Holdings, Ltd. and Carib Acquisition, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8- K dated September 30, 2010 and filed on October 6, 2010).

3.1

  

Composite Certificate of Incorporation of Popular, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012).

3.2

  

Composite Amended and Restated Bylaws of Popular, Inc., (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated and filed on September 29, 2014).

4.1

  

Specimen of Physical Common Stock Certificate of Popular, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 29, 2012 and filed on May 30, 2012).

4.2

  

Senior Indenture, dated as of February 15, 1995, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture thereto, dated as of May 8, 1997, each between Popular, Inc. and JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The First National Bank of Chicago), as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d) to the Registration Statement No. 333-26941 of Popular, Inc., Popular International Bank, Inc., and Popular North America, Inc., as filed with the SEC on May 12, 1997).

4.3

  

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 5, 1999, between Popular, Inc. and JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The First National Bank of Chicago), as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(e) to Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 002-96018), dated August 5, 1999, as filed with the SEC on August 17, 1999).

4.4

  

Subordinated Indenture dated as of November 30, 1995, between Popular, Inc. and JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The First National Bank of Chicago), as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(e) of Popular, Inc.’s Registration Statement No. 333- 26941, dated May 12, 1997).

4.5

  

Indenture of Popular North America, Inc., dated as of October 1, 1991, as supplemented by the First Supplemental Indenture thereto, dated as of February 28, 1995, and the Second Supplemental Indenture thereto, dated as of May 8, 1997, each among Popular North America, Inc., as issuer, Popular, Inc., as guarantor, and JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The First National Bank of Chicago), as successor trustee, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(f) to the Registration Statement No. 333-26941 of Popular, Inc., Popular International Bank, Inc. and Popular North America, Inc., as filed with the SEC on May 12, 1997).

 

53


Table of Contents

4.6

  

Third Supplemental Indenture of Popular North America, Inc., dated as of August 5, 1999, among Popular North America, Inc., Popular, Inc., as guarantor, and JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The First National Bank of Chicago), as successor trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) to Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated August 5, 1999, as filed with the SEC on August 17, 1999).

4.7

  

Form of Fixed Rate Medium-Term Note, Series F, of Popular North America, Inc., endorsed with the guarantee of Popular, Inc.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(g) of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 23, 2004 and filed on July 2, 2004).

4.8

  

Form of Floating Rate Medium-Term Note, Series F, of Popular North America, Inc., endorsed with the guarantee of Popular, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h) of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 23, 2004 and filed on July 2, 2004).

4.9

  

Administrative Procedures governing Medium-Term Notes, Series F, of Popular North America, Inc., guaranteed by Popular, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated June 23, 2004 and filed on July 2, 2004).

4.10

  

Junior Subordinated Indenture, among Popular North America, Inc., as issuer, Popular, Inc., as guarantor, and JP Morgan Chase Bank (formerly known as The First National Bank of Chicago), as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)(a) of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated and filed on February 19, 1997).

4.11

  

Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 31, 2009, among Popular North America, Inc., as issuer, Popular, Inc., as guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.12

  

Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of BanPonce Trust I, dated as of August 31, 2009, among Popular North America, Inc., as depositor, Popular, Inc., as guarantor, The Bank of New York Mellon, as property trustee, BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, as Delaware trustee, the Administrative Trustees named therein, and the several Holders, as defined therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.13

  

Certificate of Trust of BanPonce Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009 and filed on September 3, 2009, included as Exhibit A of the Amended and Restated Trust Agreement).

4.14

  

Form of Capital Securities Certificate for BanPonce Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)(g) of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K, dated and filed on February 19, 1997).

4.15

  

Guarantee Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2009, by and among Popular North America, Inc., as guarantor, Popular, Inc., as additional guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as guarantee trustee, relating to BanPonce Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.16

  

Form of Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debenture for Popular North America, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)(i) of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000- 13818), dated and filed on February 19, 1997).

4.17

  

Form of Certificate representing Popular, Inc.’s 6.375% Non-Cumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, 2003 Series A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Form 8-A filed on February 25, 2003).

 

54


Table of Contents

4.18

  

Certificate of Designation, Preference and Rights of Popular, Inc.’s 6.375% Non-Cumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, 2003 Series A (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Popular, Inc.’s Form 8-A filed on February 25, 2003).

4.19

  

Form of Certificate of Trust of Popular Capital Trust III and Popular Capital Trust IV dated September 5, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Registration Statement filed with the SEC on September 5, 2003).

4.20

  

Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Trust of Popular Capital Trust IV (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to the Automatic Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR filed with the SEC on June 16, 2012).

4.21

  

Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 31, 2009, between Popular, Inc., as Issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.22

  

Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement of Popular Capital Trust I, dated as of August 31, 2009, among Popular, Inc., as depositor, The Bank of New York Mellon, as property trustee, BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, as Delaware trustee, the Administrative Trustees named therein, and the several Holders, as defined therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.23

  

Certificate of Trust of Popular Capital Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009 and filed on September 3, 2009, included as Exhibit A of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement).

4.24

  

Form of Global Capital Securities Certificate for Popular Capital Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009 and filed on September 3, 2009, included as Exhibit C of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement).

4.25

  

Guarantee Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2009, between Popular, Inc., as guarantor and The Bank of New York Mellon, as guarantee trustee, relating to Popular Capital Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.26

  

Certificate of Junior Subordinated Debenture relating to Popular, Inc.’s 6.70% Junior Subordinated Debentures, Series A Due November 1, 2033 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on November 4, 2003).

4.27

  

Indenture dated as of October 31, 2003, between Popular, Inc. and JP Morgan Chase Institutional Services (formerly Bank One Trust Company, N.A.) Debenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31,2003, as filed with the SEC on November 4, 2003).

4.28

  

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 31, 2003, between Popular, Inc. and JP Morgan Chase Institutional Services (formerly Bank One Trust Company, N.A.) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2003, as filed with the SEC on November 4, 2003).

4.29

  

Form of Junior Subordinated Indenture among Popular North America, Inc., Popular, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to the Automatic Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR filed with the SEC on June 16, 2012).

4.30

  

Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 31, 2009, among Popular North America, Inc., as issuer, Popular, Inc., as guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8- K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.31

  

Amended and Restated Trust Agreement of Popular North America Capital Trust I, dated as of August 31, 2009, among Popular North America, Inc., as depositor, Popular, Inc., as guarantor, The Bank of New York Mellon, as property trustee,

 

55


Table of Contents
  

BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, as Delaware trustee, the Administrative Trustees named therein, and the several Holders, as defined therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.32

  

Certificate of Trust of Popular North America Capital Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009 and filed on September 3, 2009, included as Exhibit A of the Amended and Restated Trust Agreement).

4.33

  

Form of Capital Securities Certificate for Popular North America Capital Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009 and filed on September 3, 2009, included as Exhibit E of the Amended and Restated Trust Agreement).

4.34

  

Guarantee Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2009, by and among Popular North America, Inc., as guarantor, Popular, Inc., as additional guarantor and The Bank of New York Mellon, as guarantee trustee, relating to Popular North America Capital Trust I (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.35

  

Certificate of Junior Subordinated Debenture relating to Popular, Inc.’s 6.125% Junior Subordinated Debentures, Series A due December 1, 2034 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2004, as filed with the SEC on December 3, 2004).

4.36

  

Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2004, between Popular, Inc. and JP Morgan Trust Company, National Association (formerly Bank One Trust Company, N.A.) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 30, 2004, as filed with the SEC on December 3, 2004).

4.37

  

Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 31, 2009, between Popular, Inc., as Issuer, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as successor trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.38

  

Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement of Popular Capital Trust II, dated as of August 31, 2009, among Popular, Inc., as depositor, The Bank of New York Mellon, as property trustee, BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware, as Delaware trustee, the Administrative Trustees named therein, and the several Holders, as defined therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.39

  

Certificate of Trust of Popular Capital Trust II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009 and filed on September 3, 2009, included as Exhibit A of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement).

4.40

  

Form of Global Capital Securities Certificate for Popular Capital Trust II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009 and filed on September 3, 2009, included as Exhibit C of the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement).

4.41

  

Guarantee Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2009, between Popular, Inc., as guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as guarantee trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 31, 2009, and filed on September 3, 2009).

4.42

  

Certificate of Designation of the Popular, Inc.’s 8.25% Non-Cumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 to Popular, Inc.’s Form 8-A filed with the SEC on May 28, 2008).

4.43

  

Form of certificate representing the Popular, Inc.’s 8.25% Non-Cumulative Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series B (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to Popular, Inc.’s Form 8-A filed with the SEC on May 28, 2008).

 

56


Table of Contents

4.44

  

Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 15, 2010, between Popular, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Popular Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March, 15, 2010 and filed on March 19, 2010).

4.45

  

Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated March 15, 2010, between Popular, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Popular Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated March, 15, 2010 and filed on March 19, 2010).

4.46

  

Purchase Money Note, issued on April 30, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8- K dated April 30, 2010 and filed on May 6, 2010).

4.47

  

Value Appreciation Instrument, issued on April 30, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 30, 2010 and filed on May 6, 2010).

4.48

  

Popular North America, Inc. 7.47% Senior Note Due 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 10, 2011 and filed on June 13, 2011).

4.49

  

Popular North America, Inc. 7.66% Senior Note Due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 10, 2011 and filed on June 13, 2011).

4.50

  

Popular North America, Inc. 7.86% Senior Note Due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 10, 2011 and filed on June 13, 2011).

4.51

  

Certificate of Trust of Popular North America Capital Trust II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.22 to the Automatic Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR filed with the SEC on June 16, 2006).

4.52

  

Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement of each of Popular North America Capital Trust II and Popular North America Capital Trust III dated June 16, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.20 to the Automatic Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR filed with the SEC on June 16, 2012).

4.53

  

Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Trust of each of Popular North America Capital Trust II and Popular North America Capital Trust III (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.24 to the Automatic Shelf Registration Statement on Form S-3ASR filed with the SEC on June 16, 2012).

4.54

  

Eight Supplemental Indenture between Popular, Inc. and Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, dated July 1, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2014 and filed on July 2, 2014).

10.1

  

Popular, Inc. Senior Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated April 23, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8.2. of Popular, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.

10.2

  

Popular, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Popular, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-60666), filed on May 10, 2001).

10.3

  

Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of Popular, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004).

10.4

  

Amendment to the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Popular’s Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on March 5, 2013).

10.5

  

Form of Compensation Agreement for Directors Elected Chairman of a Committee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).

 

57


Table of Contents

10.6

  

Form of Compensation Agreement for Directors not Elected Chairman of a Committee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Popular, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).

10.7

  

Compensation Agreement for William J. Teuber as director of Popular, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Popular, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004).

10.8

  

Compensation agreement for Alejandro M. Ballester as director of Popular, Inc. dated January 28, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Popular, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).

10.9

  

Compensation agreement for Carlos A. Unanue as director of Popular, Inc. dated January 28, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of Popular, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009).

10.10

  

Compensation agreement for C. Kim Goodwin as director of Popular, Inc. dated May 10, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011).

10.11

  

Compensation Agreement for David E. Goel as director of Popular, Inc. dated April 30, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Popular, Inc’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013).

10.12

  

Compensation Agreement for Joaquin E. Bacardi, III as director of Popular, Inc. dated April 30, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Popular, Inc’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2013).

10.13

  

Compensation Agreement for John. W. Diercksen as director of Popular, Inc. dated October 18, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of Popular, Inc.’s Annual Report on 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

10.14

  

Form of Letter Agreement Regarding Standards for Incentive Compensation to Executive Officers under the TARP Capital Purchase Program (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of Popular, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008).

10.15

  

Purchase Agreement dated as of December 5, 2008 between Popular, Inc. and the United States Department of the Treasury (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2008, as filed with the SEC on December 8, 2008).

10.16

  

Exchange Agreement by and among Popular, Inc., Popular Capital Trust III and the United States Department of Treasury, dated as of August 21, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 21, 2009 and filed on August 26, 2009).

10.17

  

Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement dated as of September 30, 2010, among Popular, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and EVERTEC, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed on October 14, 2011).

10.18

  

Technology Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2010, between Popular, Inc. and EVERTEC, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 30, 2010 and filed on October 6, 2010).

10.19

  

Employment Offer to Carlos J. Vázquez, as President of Banco Popular North America (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of Popular, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010).

10.20

  

Stockholder Agreement dated as of April 17, 2012, among Carib Latam Holdings, Inc., and each of the holders of Carib Latam Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 17, 2012 and filed on April 23, 2012).

10.21

  

Form of Popular, Inc. TARP Long-Term Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of Popular, Inc’s Annual Report of Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012).

 

58


Table of Contents

10.22

  

Form of 2014 Transition Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Popular, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).

10.23

  

Form of 2014 Transition Restricted Stock Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Popular, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014).

10.24

  

Employment Termination Agreement dated December 31, 2014 between Jorge Junquera Diez, his wife Marilú Amadeo and their conjugal partnership, and Popular, Inc. (1)

10.25

  

Purchase and Assumption Agreement all Deposits among Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Doral Bank. San Juan Puerto Rico, Puerto Rico Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, dated as of February 27, 2015. (1)

12.1

  

Popular, Inc.’s Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. (1)

13.1

  

Popular, Inc.’s Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2014. (1)

21.1

  

Schedule of Subsidiaries of Popular, Inc. (1)

23.1

  

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. (1)

31.1

  

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1)

31.2

  

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1)

32.1

  

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1)

32.2

  

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (1)

99.1

  

Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 31 C.F.R. § 30.15 (1)

99.2

  

Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 31 C.F.R. § 30.15 (1)

101.INS 

  

XBRL Instance Document (1)

101.SCH 

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (1)

101.CAL 

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document (1)

101.DEF 

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definitions Linkbase Document (1)

101.LAB 

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (1)

101.PRE 

  

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1)

 

(1)  

Included herewith

Popular, Inc. has not filed as exhibits certain instruments defining the rights of holders of debt of Popular, Inc. not exceeding 10% of the total assets of Popular, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. Popular, Inc. hereby agrees to furnish upon request to the Commission a copy of each instrument defining the rights of holders of senior and subordinated debt of Popular, Inc., or of any of its consolidated subsidiaries.

 

59

Exhibit 10.24

AGREEMENT

This Agreement (“Agreement”), dated as of December 31, 2014, is made by and among Mr. Jorge Junquera Diez (“Executive”), his wife Marilú Amadeo and their conjugal partnership (collectively referred to as the “Executive and his spouse”), and Popular, Inc.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, Executive is employed by Popular, Inc. in the capacity of Vice Chairman and Special Assistant to the CEO;

WHEREAS, Executive also serves as appointee of Popular, Inc. in the board of directors of certain entities;

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that Executive’s employment relationship with Popular, Inc. will end effective February 28, 2015;

WHEREAS, the parties desire to enter into this Agreement in order to provide for the orderly transition of Executive from Popular, Inc.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants contained in this Agreement, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Executive and his spouse and Popular agree as follows:

 

1. TERMINATION

 

  a) Termination : The parties acknowledge and agree that, effective February 28, 2015 (the “Termination Date”), Executive’s employment with Popular shall terminate as a result of a reorganization that will result in the elimination of his position. In connection with such termination, and upon Popular’s request, Executive agrees to resign from any board of directors on which Executive serves as a nominee of Popular and to execute any documentation necessary to effect such resignation.

 

  b) Transition Period : For the period commencing on the date hereof and ending on the Termination Date (the “Transition Period”), Executive shall continue to be employed by Popular in his current capacity.

 

  c) Compliance . During the Transition Period, Executive shall comply in full with (i) all applicable laws, orders and regulations, (ii) Popular’s Code of Ethics, Policies and Guidelines; and (iii) the employee manual in effect.

 

  d)

Payment of Salary/Benefits . During the Transition Period, Executive shall continue to receive Executive’s current base salary paid in the normal course in accordance with Popular’s payroll policy, as well as other compensation and benefits to which Executive is entitled in his current position (but not any accrued but unpaid bonus or other incentive compensation other than as described herein) with Popular. During the Transition Period,


 

Executive shall be entitled to any Christmas Bonus awarded. Executive will also qualify to receive a cash incentive payment for his performance during 2014, subject to any legal limitations and as determined by the Compensation Committee of Popular, Inc. in its sole discretion. Executive will not participate in any other bonus or incentive compensation program which may be in effect at Popular.

 

  e) Accrued Vacation Pay . Within ten days of the Termination Date, Executive shall be compensated for all accrued but unused vacation days.

 

  f) Effect on Other Agreements . Upon the full execution of this Agreement, this Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement with respect to the terms of Executive’s employment and any compensation or benefits for which Executive may be entitled either prior to or after the Termination Date. This Agreement shall supersede any other or earlier employment or benefits or other agreement.

 

  g) Reference to Popular . The parties agree that for purposes of this Agreement, “Popular” includes, but is not limited to, Popular, Inc., its predecessors, successors and assigns, its current and former affiliates, subsidiaries, divisions, and related business entities and, with respect to each such entity, all of its past and present employees, officers, directors, stockholders, owners, representatives, assigns, attorneys, agents, insurers, employee benefit programs (and the trustees, administrators, fiduciaries and insurers of such programs) and any other persons acting by, through, under or in concert with any of the persons or entities listed in this paragraph.

 

2. PAYMENTS AND BENEFITS

 

  a) Separation Payment . In exchange for Executive’s covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, Executive shall be paid a voluntary separation payment in the gross amount of $3,100,000.00 (“Separation Payment”), pursuant to and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Separation Payment will be subject to FICA withholdings and will be paid to Executive in one lump sum payment which will be delivered to Executive within ten days after the Effective Date (as defined on Annex A to this Agreement), provided that Executive and his spouse do not revoke their agreement to the Release attached as Annex A within the seven-day period provided therein. The Separation Payment will be reported by Popular to the PR Treasury Department on Form 480.6D.

 

  b) Statutory Acknowledgments . Executive and his spouse acknowledge that (i) Executive is not otherwise entitled to the Separation Payment; and (ii) the Separation Payment is made under articles 2(e) and 10 of Puerto Rico Law 80 of May 30, 1976, as amended by Puerto Rico Law 278 of August 15, 2008 (“Law 80”). For avoidance of doubt, Executive and his spouse acknowledge that although Executive’s termination of employment is for just cause under Law 80 and, thus, he is not entitled to severance compensation under Law 80, Executive agrees that if a court determines otherwise, the Separation Payment will be credited against any liability imposed by a court on account of Executive’s termination of employment under a final, un-appealable order issued by said court.

 

2


Executive and his spouse further acknowledge that the Separation Payment is being provided to Executive solely in consideration of the covenants and agreements made by Executive and his spouse under this Agreement.

Executive and his spouse hereby declare that they have not received tax advice from Popular or its representatives, and express that they have received tax advice regarding this Agreement and its fiscal consequences from their personal advisors. Executive and his spouse assume the entire responsibility for the payment of any taxes owed to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico that may be appropriate or imposed, as well as any surcharge, penalty or interest, and expressly release Popular from any liability regarding this matter.

Executive and his spouse agree to indemnify and hold harmless Popular from any liability or penalty that may be imposed on Popular for any failure to make deductions and/or withholdings to, or for Executive’s failure to pay any tax required to be paid in connection with, the Separation Payment.

 

  c) Equity Grants . In accordance with the terms of the applicable executive compensation plans, Popular will deliver to Executive 17,630 shares of Popular, Inc. common stock, net of any applicable withholding taxes, as follows (collectively, the “Equity Grants”): (i) Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended: 3,094 shares of vested restricted stock; (ii) Popular, Inc. Senior Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan: 3,319 deferred shares of Popular, Inc. common stock; (iii) TARP Restricted Stock: 11,217 shares of TARP Restricted Stock granted on February 22, 2013.

The certificates evidencing any Equity Grants payable to Executive will be delivered to Executive as soon as administratively practicable after Termination Date. If applicable, Popular shall withhold the necessary number of shares required to cover any tax withholding due upon vesting and delivery of the Equity Grants. Upon delivery of such Equity Grants, Executive shall have no further rights nor shall Executive be entitled to any further distribution under the aforementioned equity plans. All other terms and provisions of the Equity Grants as set forth in the applicable agreements shall remain in full force and effect.

 

  d) Retirement Benefits . Executive and Popular acknowledge and agree that Executive has accrued benefits under the Popular, Inc. Puerto Rico Savings and Investment Plan, the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Retirement Plan and the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Tax-Qualified Retirement Restoration Plan (collectively the “Retirement Plans”) and that Executive’s benefits under the Retirement Plans shall be determined in accordance with the provisions thereof and any election related thereto. The Separation Payment shall be excluded from eligible compensation for purposes of determining Retirement Plans deferral amounts or benefit values. Executive and Popular also acknowledge and agree that Executive is eligible to participate in the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Retiree Medical Plan in accordance with the terms and conditions of said Plan.

 

3


  e) No Further Benefits, Payments, Etc . Executive acknowledges and agrees that except as expressly provided herein, Executive’s coverage under any benefit plan, program, policy or arrangement sponsored or maintained by Popular shall cease and be terminated as of the Termination Date. Executive further acknowledges and agrees that no payment made by Popular pursuant to this Agreement is subject to any employer matching obligation or any other employer contribution under any benefit or deferred compensation plan, whether or not any such payment is characterized as wages or other compensation.

Notwithstanding the terms of this Section 2, Executive hereby agrees that, further to the restrictions on compensation included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for entities that participated in the Troubled Assets Relief Program (“TARP”), should the United States Treasury Department or any governmental agency or body determine that under any ARRA’s limitations resulting from Popular’s prior participation in TARP Executive should not have received the Separation Payment, the Separation Payment may be subject to recovery or “clawback” and Executive will be required to return the total amount. If Executive is required to return the Separation Payment received pursuant to this Agreement, then the parties’ duties and obligations set forth in this Agreement will cease to exist as of the date of the effective return by Executive of the Separation Payment. Popular agrees that in the event that it is notified of the recovery or clawback of the Separation Payment it will inform Executive within five (5) business days of the receipt of said notification.

 

3. DEATH OR DISABILITY

In the event that Executive dies or becomes disabled prior to the Termination Date, Executive’s heirs, representatives or Executive’s estate shall be entitled (subject to the release requirements set forth in this Agreement and, when applicable, the terms of the Retirement Plans) to the compensation and benefits described in Section 2 of this Agreement.

 

4. RELEASE AND WAIVER

As a condition to the receipt of the Separation Payment, Executive and his spouse shall execute and deliver, no earlier than on the Termination Date, in accordance with the terms thereof, the release attached hereto as Annex A (the “Release”). In addition, Executive agrees to execute any additional documentation as Popular deems necessary and appropriate.

 

5. ON-GOING RESTRICTIONS ON EXECUTIVE’S ACTIVITIES; COOPERATION

 

  a) General Effect . The parties agree that the provisions of this Section 5 shall apply while Executive is employed by Popular and for certain periods after Executive shall cease being employed by Popular. This Section uses the following defined terms:

“Competitive Enterprise” means any business enterprise that either (1) engages in commercial or consumer financial services, retail banking, internet banking or other financial services to either commercial or consumer customers in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico in which Executive may seek employment, or (2) holds a 5% or greater equity, voting or profit participation interest in any enterprise that engages in such a competitive activity.

 

4


“Solicit” means any direct or indirect communication, initiation, advice, encouragement or request of any person to take or refrain from taking any action (regardless of who initiated the communication in which the preceding occurs).

 

  b) Executive’s Importance to Popular and the Effect of this Section 5 . Executive acknowledges that in the course of Executive’s involvement in Popular’s activities, Executive has and has had access to Proprietary Information (as defined in Annex B attached hereto) and Popular’s client base and will profit from the goodwill associated with Popular. On the other hand, in view of Executive’s access to Proprietary Information and Executive’s importance to Popular, if Executive competes with Popular for a period of one (1) year after Executive’s employment, Popular will likely suffer significant harm (but the amount of the loss to Popular would be uncertain and not readily ascertainable). This Agreement provides Executive with substantial additional benefits over Executive’s prior arrangements with Popular, including the substantial additional compensation referred to in Section 2 hereof. In return for the benefits Executive will receive from Popular and to induce Popular to enter into this Agreement, and in light of the potential harm Executive could cause Popular, Executive agrees to the provisions of this Section 5. Popular would not have entered into this Agreement if Executive did not agree to this Section 5.

 

  c) Non-Solicitation of Popular Employees . During Executive’s employment and for one (1) year after the Termination Date, Executive agrees that he will not directly or indirectly attempt to Solicit anyone who is then an employee of Popular (or who was an employee of Popular within the prior six months) to resign from Popular or accept employment with any Competitive Enterprise. The term “Solicit” when used in this subsection shall not be deemed to include solicitation of employment of individuals who respond to public advertisement media of general distribution (i.e., not targeted to present Popular employees) without specific instruction or direction by Executive.

 

  d) Executive’s Payment Obligations/Off-sets . If Executive fails to comply with this Section 5, other than any isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent failure that is not in bad faith, Executive will pay Popular any Separation Payment that Executive shall have received in connection with this Agreement. Popular will have the right to offset Executive’s obligations under this Section against any amounts otherwise owed to Executive by any Popular entity, including under this Agreement. This payment obligation is in addition to any rights Popular may have under this Section 5. In no event shall Executive’s liability under this section 5(d) exceed the amount of the Separation Payment.

 

  e)

Cooperation . During the Transition Period and thereafter, Executive hereby agrees to make himself reasonably available and to cooperate with reasonable requests from Popular with respect to legal and regulatory matters as they arise from time to time with respect to Executive’s duties for Popular, including any investigation, litigation, government or regulatory proceeding, examination or other proceeding or dispute. Such

 

5


 

cooperation shall include, but not be limited to, preparing for and giving testimony if and when required by Popular. Popular shall reimburse Executive for all reasonable expenses incurred with respect to such cooperation, including legal fees and disbursements.

 

  f) D&O Policy . For events or acts occurred prior to the Termination Date, Executive will be indemnified under the D&O Policy applicable to directors and officers to the extent provided in the By-Laws and policies of Popular that are in effect as of the Executive’s Termination Date.

 

6. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

Executive agrees to the proprietary information provisions set forth on Annex B, which is a part of this Agreement.

 

7. DISPUTES

Except for disputes arising under Section 5 of this Agreement (including without limitation any claims for injunctive relief), any controversy, dispute or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or its interpretation, application, implementation, breach or enforcement which the parties are unable to resolve by mutual agreement, shall be settled by submission by either Executive or Popular of the controversy, claim or dispute to binding arbitration in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, before a single arbitrator in accordance with the Employment Dispute Resolution Rules of the American Arbitration Association then in effect. In any such arbitration proceeding the parties agree to provide all discovery deemed necessary by the arbitrator. The decision and award made by the arbitrator shall be accompanied by a reasoned opinion, and shall be final, binding and conclusive on all parties hereto for all purposes, and judgment may be entered thereon in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Popular will bear the totality of the arbitrator’s and administrative fees and costs. Each party shall bear its or his litigation costs and expenses; provided, however, that the arbitrator shall have the discretion to award the prevailing party reimbursement of its or his reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. Upon the request of any of the parties, at any time prior to the beginning of the arbitration hearing, the parties may attempt in good faith to settle the dispute by mediation administered by the American Arbitration Association. Popular will bear the totality of the mediator’s and administrative fees and costs.

 

8. GENERAL PROVISIONS

 

  a) Consideration . This Agreement is entered into as a material inducement to Popular in consideration of the mutual covenants contained in this Agreement. Executive and Popular acknowledge the receipt and sufficiency of the consideration to this Agreement and intend this Agreement to be legally binding.

 

  b) Executive Unaware of Violation . Executive represents and warrants that he is not aware of any fact that would (a) establish, (b) tend to establish, or (c) in any way support an allegation of a violation by Popular of the Federal Claims Act or any similar state or federal qui tam statute.

 

6


  c) Return of Popular Property . Executive affirms that no later than February 28, 2015 he will return to Popular all the property that belongs to Popular in his possession or control and that he received to carry out his duties and responsibilities while employed.

 

  d) Amendments and Waivers . Any provision of this Agreement may be amended or waived, but only if the amendment or waiver is in writing and signed, in the case of an amendment, by all of the parties, in the case of a waiver, by the party that would have benefited from the provision waived.

 

  e) Severability . If any provision of this Agreement is found by any court of competent jurisdiction (or legally empowered agency) to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable for any reason, then (i) the provision will be amended automatically to the minimum extent necessary to cure the illegality or invalidity and permit enforcement and (ii) the remainder of this Agreement will not be affected. In particular, if any provision of Section 5 is so found to violate law or be unenforceable because it applies for longer than a maximum permitted period or to greater than a maximum permitted area, or otherwise, it will be automatically amended to apply for the maximum permitted period and maximum permitted area, or otherwise.

 

  f) Non-Disparagement . Executive and his spouse agree to refrain from performing any act, engaging in any conduct or course of action or making or publishing any statements, claims, allegations or assertions which have or may reasonably have the effect of demeaning the name or business reputation of Popular or any of its respective employees, officers, directors, agents or advisors in their capacities as such or which adversely affects (or may reasonably be expected to adversely affect) the best interests (economic or otherwise) of any of them. The parties agree that nothing in this Section 8(f) shall preclude Executive and his spouse from fulfilling any duty or obligation that they may have at law, from responding to any subpoena or official inquiry from any court or government agency, including providing truthful testimony, documents subpoenaed or requested or otherwise cooperating in good faith with any proceeding or investigation, or from taking any reasonable actions to enforce their rights under this Agreement in accordance with the dispute resolution provisions specified in this Agreement.

 

  g) No Admission of Liability . Popular has entered into this Agreement with Executive and his spouse voluntarily. Popular does not believe or admit it has done anything wrong or illegal. Executive and his spouse agree that this Agreement shall not be admissible in any court or other forum for any purpose other than the enforcement of its terms.

 

  h) Entire Agreement . This Agreement, together with the Annexes attached thereto, sets forth the entire agreement between the parties, and, except as otherwise provided herein, fully supersedes any and all prior agreements, understandings, or representations between the parties pertaining to the subject matter of this Agreement.

 

  i) Governing Law . This Agreement shall in all respects be governed by and construed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

 

7


  j) Jurisdiction and Venue . Subject to the provisions of Section 7 above, this Agreement shall be deemed performable by all parties in, and venue shall exclusively be in the state or federal courts (without a jury) located in San Juan, Puerto Rico. The parties hereby consent to the personal jurisdiction of these courts and waive any objection that such venue is objectionable or improper.

 

  k) Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed as counterparts, each of which will constitute an original and all of which, when taken together, will constitute one agreement.

Please confirm your acceptance of the terms of this Agreement by signing where indicated below.

DATED: December 31, 2014

 

Executive POPULAR, INC.

/S/JORGE JUNQUERA DIEZ

/S/EDUARDO NEGRON

Eduardo J. Negrón
Executive Vice President
Spouse

/S/MARILU AMADEO

Marilú Amadeo

 

8


Annex A

GENERAL RELEASE

General Release (this “Release”), by Jorge Junquera Diez (the “Executive”), his wife Marilú Amadeo and their conjugal partnership (collectively referred to as the “Executive and his spouse”), in favor of Popular, Inc., and any of its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively “Popular”) and any of their respective past or present shareholders, principals, directors, officers, employees, managers, agents, attorneys, trustees, fiduciaries, representatives, insurers, assigns or benefit plan administrators (collectively the “Released Parties”).

RECITALS

A. Executive has been employed by Popular, Inc. in the capacity of Vice Chairman and Special Assistant to the CEO, and has served as appointee of Popular in the board of directors of certain entities.

B. Executive would receive payments under that certain Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2014 (the “Agreement”), that are conditioned on the execution and effectiveness of this Release.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

 

  1.

General Release . Executive knowingly and voluntarily waives, terminates, cancels, releases and discharges forever the Released Parties from any and all actions, causes of action, claims, allegations, rights, obligations, liabilities, or charges (collectively the “Claims”) that he has or may have, whether known or unknown, by reason of any matter, cause or thing occurring at any time before and including the date of this Release, including, without limitation, claims for compensation or bonuses (including, without limitation, any claim for an award under any compensation plan or arrangement); breach of contract; tort; wrongful, unjust, abusive, unfair, constructive, or unlawful discharge or dismissal; impairment of economic opportunity; defamation; age and national origin discrimination; sexual harassment or discrimination; discrimination based on marital status; back pay; front pay; benefits; attorney’s fees; whistleblower claims; emotional distress; intentional infliction of emotional distress; assault; battery, pain and suffering; punitive or exemplary damages; all claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 and 1991 and Executive Order 11246, which prohibit employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin; the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 and the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act of 1990, which prohibit employment discrimination because of age against individuals who are 40 years of age or older; the Equal Pay Act, which prohibits sex-based wage discrimination against men and women who perform substantially equal work in the same establishment; the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in the private sector, and in state and local governments; and Sections 501 and 505 of the

 

1


 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, which prohibit federal contractors to discriminate in employment against qualified individuals with disabilities; the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) of May 21, 2008, which prohibits discrimination against employees based on genetic information; the Family and Medical Leave Act, which protects employees’ rights to medical and family leave; the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA); the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974 (VEVRAA); the Constitution of Puerto Rico, which prohibits discriminatory treatment; Law 69 of July 6, 1985, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of sex; Law 17 of April 22, 1988, which prohibits sexual harassment in employment; Law 100 of June 30, 1959, as amended, which prohibits employment discrimination based on age, race, color, sex, marital status, social or national origin, social condition, political affiliation, political or religious beliefs, or against an employee for being a victim or being perceived as a victim of domestic violence, sexual aggression or stalking, or based on sexual orientation or gender identity; Law 116 of December 20, 1991; Law 44 of July 2, 1985, which prohibits employment discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities or under any other local, state or federal law which prohibits discrimination, harassment or retaliation; Law 139 of June 26, 1968 (SINOT); Law 45 of April 18, 1935 (State Insurance Fund); the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA); the Workers Adjustment Retraining and Notification Act (WARN); the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA); the Federal Bankruptcy Act; the Insurance and the Civil Codes of Puerto Rico; Law 80 of May 30, 1976; Law 379 of May 15, 1948 (Days and Hours of Work); Law 96 of June 26, 1956 (Minimum Wage); Law 180 of July 27, 1998 (vacation and sick leave) and any other federal, state or local (including Puerto Rico) laws, whether based on statute, regulation or common law, providing workers’ compensation benefits; restricting an employer’s right to terminate employees or otherwise regulating employment; or enforcing express or implied employment contracts or requiring an employer to deal with employees fairly or in good faith; providing recourse for alleged wrongful discharge, harassment or discrimination, physical or personal injury, emotional distress, fraud, negligent misrepresentation, libel, slander, defamation and similar or related claims, or any law regarding wages or compensation, retaliation, negligence, loss of consortium, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, or any other claim and any alleged injuries he may have suffered up to and including the Termination Date, as defined in the Agreement. In addition, in consideration of the provisions of this Release, the Executive further agrees to waive any and all rights under the laws of any jurisdiction in the United States or Puerto Rico that limit a general release to those claims that are known or suspected to exist in Executive’s favor as of the Effective Date (as defined below).

In addition, Executive represents and warrants that he has not been the victim of retaliation under Section 704 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 USC § 2000e-3); the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA, 29 USC § 3(d)); the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDIA, 12 USC § 831j); Article 8 of Law 17 of April 22, 1988 (29 L.P.R.A. § 155h); Article 20 of Law 69 of July 6, 1985 (29 L.P.R.A § 340); Law 115 of December 20, 1991, as amended by Law 169 of September 29, 2014 (29 L.P.R.A § 94 et seq.); Section 806 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002; or any other federal or local statute or regulation which prohibits retaliation against an employee.

 

2


Furthermore, Executive and his spouse, their heirs, executors, assignees, and agents, do not have, and if they had they hereby waive any claim of any type, and the remedies, under any federal, state or Commonwealth of Puerto Rico law, including those related to or that may be alleged as arising from the employment relationship between Executive and Popular, or the termination of the same, and grant the most complete release for any claim or cause of action they have or may have or had, known or unknown, whether in law or in equity, in contract, or torts, against the Released Parties, and they acknowledge and agree that they will not file suit in the United States District Court, any Federal or state courts, any Commonwealth of Puerto Rico court or in any other forum for any cause of action that could arise from Executive’s employment or the termination of his employment under any local, state or federal employment law or regulation. Executive and his spouse, based on personal knowledge, recognize and declare that they have not suffered damages caused by, or attributable to, the Released Parties, and that their relatives, heirs, executors, assignees and/or agents, or any other parties claiming a relationship of dependence, interest or affection with Executive, have not suffered any damage that may blamed on, or attributable to, the Released Parties for any reason including, but not limited to the employment relationship of Executive, the termination of employment and any incident or fact occurred during his employment with Popular. Executive and his spouse agree to hold harmless and indemnify the Released Parties, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs incurred by the Released Parties, for any action filed by any member of their family or by any of their relatives or by any other parties claiming a relationship of dependence, interest or affection with them for the causes of action being released herein. The parties agree and understand that the purpose of this paragraph is to exclude the Released Parties from any liability or cause of action that could be filed pursuant to Santini v. Service Air, Inc. , 137 D.P.R. 1 (1994).

 

  2. No Further Payments . Except as provided in Section 2(a) of the Agreement, Executive acknowledges that he has been fully compensated by Popular under its rules, policies, practices, plans, programs and regulations, and every employment agreement or any other contract or agreement, applicable laws and regulations, and that nothing is owed for salaries, vacations, bonuses, incentives, separation benefits, severance payment, reimbursement of expenses, “allowances”, or for any other concept including, but not limited to his participation in any other kind of plan, program or incentive, and that all of his wages and benefits with Popular have been settled to his entire satisfaction.

 

  3. Surviving Claims . Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Release shall not:

 

  a) release any Claims relating to the payments and benefits set forth in Section 2 of the Agreement;

 

  b) release any Claims arising after the date of this Release;

 

3


  c) limit or prohibit in any way Executive’s (or his beneficiaries’ or legal representatives’) ability to bring an action to enforce the terms of this Release;

 

  d) release any claim for Executive benefits under plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, to the extent that such claims may not lawfully be waived or for any payments or benefits under any plans of Popular that have vested according to the terms of those plans;

 

  e) release any claims for indemnification in accordance with applicable laws and the corporate governance documents of Popular, including any right to contribution, in accordance with their terms as in effect from time to time or pursuant to any applicable directors and officers insurance policy with respect to any liability incurred by Executive as an officer or director of Popular or any member of Popular or any right Executive may have to obtain contribution as permitted by law in the event of entry of judgment; or

 

  f) release any obligations from any individual who is a Released Party arising from any personal business relationship with Executive outside of the employment relationship, including, without limitation, any mortgages or loans.

4. Additional Representations . Executive and his spouse further represent and warrant that they have not filed any civil action, suit, arbitration, administrative charge, or legal proceeding against any Released Party nor have they assigned, pledged, or hypothecated as of the Effective Date their claim to any person and no other person has an interest in the claims that they are releasing.

5. Acknowledgements by Executive and his spouse . Executive and his spouse acknowledge and agree that they have read this Release in its entirety and that this Release is a general release of all known and unknown claims, including, without limitation, to rights and claims arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Executive and his spouse further acknowledge and agree that:

 

  a) This Release does not release, waive or discharge any rights or claims that may arise for actions or omissions after the date of this Release;

 

  b) Executive and his spouse are entering into this Release and releasing, waiving and discharging rights or claims only in exchange for consideration which they are not already entitled to receive;

 

  c) Executive and his spouse have been advised, and are being advised by the Release, to consult with an attorney and tax advisor before executing this Release;

 

  d) Executive and his spouse have been advised, and are being advised by this Release, that they have twenty-one (21) days within which to consider the Release; and

 

4


  e) Executive and his spouse are aware that this Release shall become null and void if they revoke their agreement to this Release within seven (7) days following the date of execution of this Release. Executive may revoke this Release at any time during such seven-day period by delivering (or causing to be delivered) to Popular, Inc., 209 Muñoz Rivera Avenue, San Juan, PR 00918, Attention: Eduardo J. Negrón, Executive Vice President, written notice of their revocation of this Release no later than 5:00 p.m. eastern time on the seventh (7th) full day following the date of execution of this Release (the “Effective Date”). The Executive and his spouse agree and acknowledge that a letter of revocation that is not received by such date and time will be invalid and will not revoke this Release.

6. Additional Agreements . Executive and his spouse agree that should any person or entity file or cause to be filed any civil action, suit, arbitration, or other legal proceeding seeking equitable or monetary relief concerning any claim released by Executive and his spouse herein, Executive and his spouse shall not seek or accept any personal relief from or as the result of such civil action, suit, arbitration, or other legal proceeding.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Executive and his spouse have signed this Release on             , 2015.

 

Executive

 

Jorge Junquera Diez

Spouse

 

Marilú Amadeo

 

Accepted and Agreed:
Popular, Inc.

By:

 

Eduardo J. Negrón

 

5


Annex B

PROPRIETARY INFORMATION

(a) Definition . “Proprietary Information” means confidential or proprietary information, knowledge or data concerning (1) Popular’s businesses, strategies, operations, financial affairs, organizational matters, personnel matters, budgets, business plans, marketing plans, studies, policies, procedures, products, ideas, processes, software systems, trade secrets and technical know-how, (2) any other matter relating to Popular, and (3) any matter relating to clients of Popular or other third parties having relationships with Popular. Proprietary Information includes (1) information regarding any aspect of your tenure as an Executive of Popular or the termination of your employment, (2) the names, addresses, and phone numbers and other information concerning clients and prospective clients of Popular, (3) investment techniques and trading strategies used in, and the performance records of, client accounts or other investment products, and (4) information and materials concerning the personal affairs of employees of Popular. In addition, Proprietary Information may include information furnished to you orally or in writing (whatever the form or storage medium) or gathered by inspection, in each case before or after the date of this Agreement. However, Proprietary Information does not include information (1) that was or becomes generally available to you on a non-confidential basis, if the source of this information was not reasonably known to you to be bound by a duty of confidentiality, (2) that was or becomes generally available to the public, other than as a result of a disclosure by you, directly or indirectly, or (3) that you can establish was independently developed by you without reference to any Proprietary Information.

(b) Use and Disclosure . You will obtain or create Proprietary Information in the course of your involvement in Popular’s activities and may already have Proprietary Information. You agree, represent and warrant that you have complied with and will continue to comply with the Confidential and Proprietary Information section of Popular, Inc.’s Code of Ethics, which, as provided therein, survives your termination of employment. You agree that the Proprietary Information is the exclusive property of Popular, and that, while you are employed by a member of Popular, you will use and disclose Proprietary Information only for Popular’s benefit and in accordance with any restrictions placed on its use or disclosure by Popular. After you cease being employed by a member of Popular, you will not use or disclose any Proprietary Information. In addition, nothing in this Agreement will operate to weaken or waive any rights Popular may have under statutory or common law, or any other agreement, to the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information and other confidential information. You shall give written notice to the Chief Legal Officer of Popular of any request or demand for Confidential and Proprietary Information immediately upon receipt of any request for such information and shall reasonably cooperate with Popular in any application Popular may make seeking a protective order or barring disclosure of such Proprietary Information.

(c) Disputes . The existence of, and any information concerning, a dispute between you and Popular will be Proprietary Information. However, you may disclose information concerning the dispute to the arbitrator or court that is considering the dispute and to your legal counsel (so long as your counsel agrees not to disclose any such information other than as necessary to the prosecution or defense of the dispute).

 

1


(d) Return of Proprietary Information . When your employment terminates, you agree to return to the Company all Proprietary Information, including all notes, mailing lists, rolodexes and computer files that contain any Proprietary Information. You agree to do anything reasonably requested by the Company in furtherance of perfecting Popular’s possession of, and title to, any Proprietary information that was at any time in your possession.

(e) Limitations . Nothing in this Agreement prohibits you from providing truthful testimony concerning Popular to governmental, regulatory or self-regulatory authorities.

 

2

 

 

PURCHASE AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

ALL DEPOSITS

AMONG

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,

RECEIVER OF DORAL BANK,

SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

AND

BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO

DATED AS OF

February 27, 2015

 

 

 

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


PURCHASE AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ARTICLE I. GENERAL

  1   

1.1

Purpose

  1   

1.2

[Reserved]

  1   

1.3

Defined Terms

  2   

ARTICLE II. ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITIES

  11   

2.1

Liabilities Assumed by Assuming Institution

  11   

2.2

Interest on Deposit Liabilities

  12   

2.3

Unclaimed Deposits

  13   

2.4

Employee Plans

  13   

ARTICLE III. PURCHASE OF ASSETS

  13   

3.1

Assets Purchased by the Assuming Institution

  13   

3.2

Asset Purchase Price

  14   

3.3

Manner of Conveyance; Limited Warranty; Nonrecourse; Etc.

  16   

3.4

Puts of Assets to the Receiver

  16   

3.5

Assets Not Purchased by Assuming Institution

  18   

3.6

Retention or Repurchase of Assets Essential to Receiver

  20   

3.7

Receiver’s Offer to Sell Withheld Loans

  21   

ARTICLE IV. ASSUMPTION OF CERTAIN DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS

  21   

4.1

Continuation of Banking Business

  21   

4.2

Credit Card Business

  22   

4.3

Safe Deposit Business

  22   

4.4

Safekeeping Business

  22   

4.5

Trust Business

  23   

4.6

Bank Premises

  23   

4.7

Agreement with Respect to Leased Data Management Equipment

  28   

4.8

Certain Existing Agreements

  29   

4.9

Informational Tax Reporting

  29   

4.10

Insurance

  30   

4.11

Office Space for Receiver and Corporation; Certain Payments

  30   

4.12

Continuation of Group Health Plan Coverage for Former Employees of the Failed Bank

  31   

4.13

Interim Asset Servicing

  32   

ARTICLE V. DUTIES WITH RESPECT TO DEPOSITORS OF THE FAILED BANK

  32   

5.1

Payment of Checks, Drafts, Orders and Deposits

  32   

5.2

Certain Agreements Related to Deposits

  32   

5.3

Notice to Depositors

  33   

ARTICLE VI. RECORDS

  33   

ARTICLE VI         Transfer of Records

  33   

6.2

[Reserved]

  33   

6.3

Preservation of Records

  34   

6.3(c)

Access to Records; Copies

  34   

ARTICLE VIII. BID; INITIAL PAYMENT

  35   

ARTICLE VIII. ADJUSTMENTS

  35   

8.1

Pro Forma Statement

  35   

8.2

Correction of Errors and Omissions; Other Liabilities

  35   

8.3

Payments

  36   

8.4

Interest

  36   

8.5

Subsequent Adjustments

  36   

ARTICLE IX. CONTINUING COOPERATION

  36   

9.1

General Matters

  36   

9.2

Additional Title Documents

  36   

9.3

Claims and Suits

  37   

9.4

Payment of Deposits

  37   

9.5

Withheld Payments

  37   

9.6

Proceedings with Respect to Certain Assets and Liabilities

  38   

9.7

Information

  38   

9.8

Tax Ruling

  38   

ARTICLE X. CONDITION PRECEDENT

  39   

ARTICLE XI. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE ASSUMING INSTITUTION

  39   

11.1

Corporate Existence and Authority

  39   

11.2

Third Party Consent

  39   

11.3

Execution and Enforceability

  39   

11.4

Compliance with Law

  39   

11.5

Insured or Guaranteed Loans

  40   

11.6

Representations Remain True

  40   

11.7

No Reliance; Independent Advice

  40   

ARTICLE XII INDEMNIFICATION

  40   

12.1

Indemnification of Indemnitees

  40   

12.2

Conditions Precedent to Indemnification

  44   

12.3

No Additional Warranty

  44   

12.4

Indemnification of Receiver and Corporation

  45   

12.5

Obligations Supplemental

  45   

12.6

Criminal Claims

  45   

12.7

Limited Guaranty of the Corporation

  45   

12.8

Subrogation

  46   

ARTICLE XIII. MISCELLANEOUS

  46   

13.1

Expenses

  46   

13.2

Waiver of Jury Trial

  46   

13.3

Consent; Determination or Discretion

  47   

13.4

Rights Cumulative

  47   

13.5

References

  47   
 

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 i Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


  13.6   

Notice

     47   
  13.7   

Entire Agreement

     48   
  13.8   

Counterparts

     48   
  13.9   

Governing Law

     48   
  13.11   

Modification

     49   
  13.12   

Manner of Payment

     49   
  13.13   

Waiver

     49   
  13.14   

Severability

     50   
  13.15   

Term of Agreement

     50   
  13.16   

Survival of Covenants, Etc.

     50   
  13.17   

Right of Receiver or Corporation to Audit

     50   
 

 

SCHEDULES

 

               Page  

Excluded Deposit Liability Accounts

   Schedule 2.1(a)         52   

Acquired Subsidiaries

   Schedule 3.1(h)         58   

Acquired Assets in Optional Loan Pools

   Schedule 3.1(n)         59   

Other Real Estate

   Schedule 3.1(o)         60   

Purchase Price of Acquired Assets

   Schedule 3.2         61   

Excluded Securities

   Schedule 3.5(l)         63   

Bank Premises in Underserved Areas

   Schedule 4.1(b)         64   

Data Retention Catalog

   Schedule 6.3         65   

Accounts Excluded from Calculation of Deposit Franchise Bid Premium

   Schedule 7         67   

EXHIBITS

 

                 Page  

Final Legal Notice

     Exhibit 2.3A            183   

Affidavit of Mailing

     Exhibit 2.3B            185   

Valuation of Certain Qualified Financial Contracts

     Exhibit 3.2(c)            186   

Interim Asset Servicing Arrangement

     Exhibit 4.13            188   

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15   ii   Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT     San Juan, PR


PURCHASE AND ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT

ALL DEPOSITS

THIS AGREEMENT , made and entered into as of the 27th day of February, 2015, by and among the FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, RECEIVER of DORAL BANK, SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO (the “ Receiver ”), BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO , organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and having its principal place of business in HATO REY, PUERTO RICO ( the Assuming Institution ) , and the FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION , organized under the laws of the United States of America and having its principal office in Washington, D.C., acting in its corporate capacity ( the Corporation ) .

R E C I T A L S

A. On the Bank Closing Date, the Chartering Authority closed DORAL BANK (the “ Failed Bank ”) pursuant to applicable law and the Corporation was appointed Receiver thereof.

B. The Assuming Institution desires to purchase certain assets and assume certain deposits and other liabilities of the Failed Bank on the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.

C. Pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1823(c)(2)(A), the Corporation may provide assistance to the Assuming Institution to facilitate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, which assistance may include indemnification pursuant to Article XII.

D. The Board of Directors of the Corporation (the “ Board ”) has determined to provide assistance to the Assuming Institution on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement.

E. The Board has determined pursuant to 12 U.S.C. § 1823(c)(4)(A) that such assistance is necessary to meet the obligation of the Corporation to provide insurance coverage for the insured deposits in the Failed Bank and is the least costly to the deposit insurance fund of all possible methods for meeting such obligation.

NOW, THEREFORE , in consideration of the mutual promises herein set forth and other valuable consideration, the parties hereto agree as follows:

A G R E E M E N T

ARTICLE I. GENERAL .

1.1. Purpose . The purpose of this Agreement is to set forth requirements regarding, among other things, the terms and conditions on which the Assuming Institution purchases certain assets and assumes certain liabilities of the Failed Bank.

1.2. [Reserved.]

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


1.3. Defined Terms . Capitalized terms used in this Agreement shall have the meanings set forth or referenced in this Section 1.3. As used herein, words imparting the singular include the plural and vice versa.

Accounting Records means the general ledger and subsidiary ledgers and supporting schedules which support the general ledger balances.

Acquired Assets ” means all assets of the Failed Bank purchased pursuant to this Agreement. Assets owned by Subsidiaries of the Failed Bank are not “Acquired Assets” within the meaning of this definition by virtue of being owned by such Subsidiaries.

Acquired Subsidiary ” or “ Acquired Subsidiaries ” means one or more, as applicable, Subsidiaries of the Failed Bank acquired pursuant to Section 3.1.

Affiliate ” of any Person means any director, officer, or employee of that Person and any other Person (i) who is directly or indirectly controlling, or controlled by, or under direct or indirect common control with, such Person, or (ii) who is an affiliate of such Person as the term “affiliate” is defined in § 2(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, 12 U.S.C. § 1841.

Agreement ” means this Purchase and Assumption Agreement by and among the Assuming Institution, the Corporation and the Receiver, as amended or otherwise modified from time to time.

Assumed Deposits ” means Deposits .

Assuming Institution ” has the meaning set forth in the introduction to this Agreement.

Bank Closing Date ” means the close of business of the Failed Bank on the date on which the Chartering Authority closed such institution.

Bank Premises ” means the banking buildings, drive-in banking facilities, teller facilities (staffed or automated), storage and service facilities, structures connecting remote facilities to banking houses, land on which the foregoing are located and unimproved land, together with any adjacent parking, that are owned or leased by the Failed Bank and that have formerly been utilized, are currently utilized, or as of the Bank Closing Date, are intended to be utilized in the future by the Failed Bank as shown on the Failed Bank Records.

Bank Premises Surrender Date means, with respect to each specific Bank Premises, the date selected by the Assuming Institution to surrender such Bank Premises to the Receiver, which date shall be no later than the first day after the Receiver is satisfied that all of the conditions for surrender of such Bank Premises set forth in this Agreement have been met; provided that, unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, such date shall not be more than 150 days after the Bank Closing Date.

Bid Amount ” has the meaning set forth in Article VII.

Bid Form ” means Exhibit “A” to the bid instructions provided to the Assuming Institution.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 2 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Bid Valuation Date ” means 12/31/14 .

Board ” has the meaning set forth in Recital D.

Book Value ” means, with respect to any Acquired Asset and any Liability Assumed, the dollar amount thereof stated on the Failed Bank Records. The Book Value of any item shall be determined as of the Bank Closing Date after adjustments made by the Receiver for differences in accounts, suspense items, unposted debits and credits and other similar adjustments or corrections and for setoffs, whether voluntary or involuntary. The Book Value of an Acquired Subsidiary shall be determined from the investment in subsidiary and related accounts on the “bank only” (unconsolidated) balance sheet of the Failed Bank based on the Equity Method of Accounting. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, (i) the Book Value of a Liability Assumed shall include all accrued and unpaid interest thereon as of the Bank Closing Date, and (ii) the Book Value of a Loan shall reflect adjustments for earned interest, or unearned interest (as it relates to the “rule of 78s” or add-on-interest loans, as applicable), if any, as of the Bank Closing Date, adjustments for the portion of earned or unearned loan-related credit life and/or disability insurance premiums, if any, attributable to the Failed Bank as of the Bank Closing Date, and adjustments for Failed Bank Advances, if any, in each case as determined for financial reporting purposes. The Book Value of an Acquired Asset shall not include any adjustment for loan premiums, discounts or any related deferred income, fees or expenses, or general or specific reserves on the Failed Bank Records.

Business Day ” means a day other than a Saturday, Sunday, Federal legal holiday or legal holiday under the laws of the State where the Failed Bank is located, or a day on which the principal office of the Corporation is closed.

Chartering Authority ” means (i) with respect to a national bank, a Federal savings association or savings bank, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, (ii) with respect to a bank or savings institution chartered by a State, the agency of such State charged with primary responsibility for regulating and/or closing banks or savings institutions, as the case may be, (iii) the Corporation in accordance with 12 U.S.C. § 1821(c)(4), with regard to self-appointment, or (iv) the appropriate Federal banking agency in accordance with 12 U.S.C. § 1821(c)(9).

Commitment ” means the unfunded portion of a line of credit or other commitment reflected on the Failed Bank Records to make an extension of credit (or additional advances with respect to a Loan) that was legally binding on the Failed Bank as of the Bank Closing Date, other than extensions of credit pursuant to the credit card business and overdraft protection plans of the Failed Bank, if any.

Corporation ” has the meaning set forth in the introduction to this Agreement.

Counterclaim ” has the meaning set forth in Section 12.1(b).

Credit Documents ” means the agreements, instruments, certificates or other documents at any time evidencing or otherwise relating to, governing or executed in connection with or as security for, a Loan, including without limitation notes, bonds, loan agreements, letter of credit applications, lease financing contracts, banker’s acceptances, drafts, interest protection agreements, currency exchange agreements, repurchase agreements, reverse repurchase agreements, guarantees, deeds of trust, mortgages, assignments, security agreements, pledges,

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 3 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


subordination or priority agreements, lien priority agreements, undertakings, security instruments, certificates, documents, legal opinions, participation agreements and intercreditor agreements, and all amendments, modifications, renewals, extensions, rearrangements, and substitutions with respect to any of the foregoing.

Credit File ” means all Credit Documents and all other credit, collateral or insurance documents in the possession or custody of the Assuming Institution, or any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates, relating to an Acquired Asset or a Loan included in a Put Notice, or copies of any such documents.

Deposit ” means a deposit as defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1813(l), including without limitation, outstanding cashier’s checks and other official checks and all uncollected items included in the depositors’ balances and credited on the Failed Bank Records; provided that the term “Deposit” shall not include all or any portion of those deposit balances which, in the discretion of the Receiver or the Corporation, (i) may be required to satisfy it for any liquidated or contingent liability of any depositor arising from an unauthorized or unlawful transaction, or (ii) may be needed to provide payment of any liability of any depositor to the Failed Bank or the Receiver, including the liability of any depositor as a director or officer of the Failed Bank, whether or not the amount of the liability is or can be determined as of the Bank Closing Date.

Deposit Secured Loan ” means a loan in which the only collateral securing the loan is Assumed Deposits or deposits at other insured depository institutions.

Electronically Stored Information ” means any system backup tapes, any electronic mail (whether on an exchange or other similar system), any data on personal computers and any data on server hard drives.

Eligible Individuals ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.12.

“Eligible Overdraft” means an overdraft that (1) was in existence on the Bank Closing Date with (2) a balance of greater than $500, and (3) was not made pursuant to an overdraft protection plan or similar extension of credit.

Equity Method of Accounting ” means the carrying value of a bank’s investment in a subsidiary is originally recorded at cost but is adjusted periodically to record as income the bank’s proportionate share of the subsidiary’s earnings or losses and decreased by the amount of cash dividends or similar distributions received from the subsidiary. Acquired Subsidiaries with negative equity will be restated to $1 pursuant to the Equity Method of Accounting.

ERISA ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.12.

Failed Bank ” has the meaning set forth in Recital A.

Failed Bank Advances ” means the total sums paid by the Failed Bank to (i) protect its lien position, (ii) pay ad valorem taxes and hazard insurance and (iii) pay premiums for credit life insurance, accident and health insurance and vendor’s single interest insurance.

“Failed Bank Assessment Area” means the most recent Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) assessment area of the Failed Bank reflected in the Information Package.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 4 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Failed Bank Records ” means records as defined in 12 C.F.R. § 360.11(a)(3).

Fair Market Value ” means:

(a) “Market Value” as defined in the regulation prescribing the standards for real estate appraisals used in federally related transactions, 12 C.F.R. § 323.2(g), and accordingly shall mean the most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller each acting prudently and knowledgeably, and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition are the assumed consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby:

(i) Buyer and seller are typically motivated;

(ii) Both parties are well informed or well advised, and acting in what they consider their own best interests;

(iii) A reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market;

(iv) Payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and

(v) The price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions granted by anyone associated with the sale;

as determined as of the Bank Closing Date by an appraiser chosen by the Receiver; any costs and fees associated with such determination shall be paid by the Receiver, and

with respect to Bank Premises (to the extent, if any, that Bank Premises are purchased utilizing this valuation method), shall be determined not later than sixty (60) days after the Bank Closing Date by an appraiser selected by the Receiver within seven (7) days after the Bank Closing Date, and with respect to Specialty Assets, shall be determined by an appraiser selected by the Receiver within seven (7) days after the Bank Closing Date; or

(b) with respect to property other than Bank Premises and Specialty Assets purchased utilizing this valuation method, the price therefor as established by the Receiver, as determined in accordance with clause (a) above.

FDIC Office Space ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.11.

Final Legal Notice ” has the meaning set forth in Section 2.3(a).

Fixtures ” means those leasehold improvements, additions, alterations and installations constituting all or a part of Bank Premises (including without limitation automated teller machines that are affixed to a Bank Premises and may be not removed without causing structural damage to such Bank Premises) and which were acquired, added, built, installed or purchased at the expense of the Failed Bank, regardless of the holder of legal title thereto as of the Bank Closing Date.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 5 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Furniture and Equipment ” means the furniture and equipment (other than Safe Deposit Boxes, Personal Computers, Owned Data Management Equipment, Specialty Assets and motor vehicles), leased or owned by the Failed Bank and reflected on the Failed Bank Records as of the Bank Closing Date and located on or at Bank Premises, including without limitation automated teller machines (to the extent they are not Fixtures), carpeting, furniture, office machinery, shelving, office supplies, telephone, surveillance and security systems, ancillary equipment and artwork. Furniture and equipment located at a storage facility not adjacent to a Bank Premises are excluded from this definition.

GNMA ” means Government National Mortgage Association.

GSE ” means a government sponsored enterprise.

Indemnitees ” means,

(a) except as provided in Section 12.1(b)(xi), (i) the Assuming Institution, (ii) the Subsidiaries and Affiliates of the Assuming Institution other than any Subsidiaries or Affiliates of the Failed Bank that are or become Subsidiaries or Affiliates of the Assuming Institution and (iii) the directors, officers, employees and agents of the Assuming Institution and its Subsidiaries and Affiliates who are not also present or former directors, officers, employees or agents of the Failed Bank or of any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Failed Bank;

(b) specifically (i) BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA, but only with respect to Failed Bank assets purchased or liabilities assumed by the Assuming Institution hereunder and subsequently transferred to BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA pursuant to the Alliance Agreement dated February 18, 2015 attached to the winning Bid Form and only to the extent the Assuming Institution would be an Indemnitee had it retained the asset or liability; (ii) FIRSTBANK PUERTO RICO, but only with respect to Failed Bank assets purchased or liabilities assumed by the Assuming Institution hereunder and subsequently transferred to FIRSTBANK PUERTO RICO pursuant to the Alliance Agreement dated February 18, 2015 attached to the winning Bid Form and only to the extent the Assuming Institution would be an Indemnitee had it retained the asset or liability; (iii) AM PR LLC, but only with respect to Failed Bank assets purchased or liabilities assumed by the Assuming Institution hereunder and subsequently transferred to AM PR LLC pursuant to the Alliance Agreement dated February 18, 2015 attached to the winning Bid Form and only to the extent the Assuming Institution would be an Indemnitee had it retained the asset or liability; (iv) CENTENNIAL BANK, but only with respect to Failed Bank assets purchased or liabilities assumed by the Assuming Institution hereunder and subsequently transferred to CENTENNIAL BANK pursuant to the Alliance Agreement dated February 13, 2015 attached to the winning Bid Form and only to the extent the Assuming Institution would be an Indemnitee had it retained the asset or liability.

Information Package ” means the most recent compilation of financial and other data with respect to the Failed Bank, including any amendments or supplements thereto, provided to the Assuming Institution by the Corporation on the web site used by the Corporation to market the Failed Bank to potential acquirers.

Initial Payment ” means the payment made pursuant to Article VII (based on the best information available as of the Bank Closing Date), the amount of which shall be either (i) if the

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 6 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Bid Amount is positive, the aggregate Book Value of the Liabilities Assumed minus the sum of the aggregate purchase price of the Acquired Assets (including any Bank Premises, Other Real Estate, Other Real Estate Subsidiaries, and Optional Loan Pools purchased via the Bid Form) as determined pursuant to Section 3.2 and the positive Bid Amount, or (ii) if the Bid Amount is negative, the sum of the aggregate Book Value of the Liabilities Assumed and the negative Bid Amount minus the aggregate purchase price of the Acquired Assets (including any Bank Premises, Other Real Estate, Other Real Estate Subsidiaries, and Optional Loan Pools purchased via the Bid Form). The Initial Payment shall be payable by the Corporation to the Assuming Institution if (i) the Liabilities Assumed are greater than the sum of the positive Bid Amount and the aggregate purchase price of the Acquired Assets, or if (ii) the sum of the Liabilities Assumed and the negative Bid Amount are greater than the aggregate purchase price of the Acquired Assets. The Initial Payment shall be payable by the Assuming Institution to the Corporation if (i) the Liabilities Assumed are less than the sum of the positive Bid Amount and the aggregate purchase price of the Acquired Assets, or if (ii) the sum of the Liabilities Assumed and the negative Bid Amount is less than the aggregate purchase price of the Acquired Assets. Such Initial Payment shall be subject to adjustment as provided in Article VIII.

“Leased Data Management Equipment” means any equipment, computer hardware, computer software (and the lease or licensing agreements related thereto), computer networking equipment, printers, fax machines, copiers, document scanners, data tape systems, data tapes, DVDs, CDs, flash drives, telecommunications and check processing equipment and any other electronic storage media leased by the Failed Bank at Bank Closing Date which is, was, or could have been used by the Failed Bank in connection with data management activities.

Liabilities Assumed ” has the meaning provided in Section 2.1.

Lien ” means any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, assignment for security purposes, security interest or encumbrance of any kind with respect to an Acquired Asset, including any conditional sale agreement or capital lease or other title retention agreement relating to such Acquired Asset.

Loan ” or “ Loans ” means, individually or collectively, all of the following owed to or held by the Failed Bank as of the Bank Closing Date:

(a) loans (including loans which have been charged off the Failed Bank Records in whole or in part prior to and including the Bid Valuation Date), participation agreements, interests in participations, overdrafts of customers (including but not limited to overdrafts made pursuant to an overdraft protection plan or similar extensions of credit in connection with a deposit account), revolving commercial lines of credit, home equity lines of credit, Commitments, United States and/or State-guaranteed student loans and lease financing contracts;

(b) all Liens, rights (including rights of set-off), remedies, powers, privileges, demands, claims, priorities, equities and benefits owned or held by, or accruing or to accrue to or for the benefit of, the holder of the obligations or instruments referred to in clause (a) above, including but not limited to those arising under or based upon Credit Documents, casualty insurance policies and binders, standby letters of credit, mortgagee title insurance policies and binders, payment bonds and performance bonds at any time and from time to time existing with respect to any of the obligations or instruments referred to in clause (a) above; and

(c) all amendments, modifications, renewals, extensions, refinancings and refundings of or for any of the foregoing.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 7 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


New Loan ” means a Loan made by the Failed Bank after the Bid Valuation Date that is not a continuation, amendment, modification, renewal, extension, refinancing, restructuring or refunding of or for any then-existing Loan.

Obligor ” means each Person liable for the full or partial payment or performance of any Loan, whether such Person is obligated directly, indirectly, primarily, secondarily, jointly or severally.

“Optional Loan Pool” means a grouping of various assets owned by the Failed Bank and offered to the Assuming Institution, as referenced in the Bid Form and described in the Information Package. Any continuation, amendment, modification, renewal, extension, refinancing, restructuring or refunding of or for any asset that was part of an Optional Loan Pool will remain part of that Optional Loan Pool. No asset may be moved between Optional Loan Pools. An asset that had been collateral securing a Loan that is part of an Optional Loan Pool remains part of that Optional Loan Pool. Any name of, or designation for, any Optional Loan Pool is for convenient reference and may not reflect the quality or nature of the assets that are part of that Optional Loan Pool.

Other Real Estate ” means all interests in real estate (other than Bank Premises and Fixtures), including but not limited to mineral estates, leasehold rights, condominium and cooperative interests, easements, air rights, water rights, and development rights that are owned by the Failed Bank as of Bid Valuation Date.

“Other Real Estate Subsidiaries” means those Subsidiaries listed on the Bid Form, if any.

Owned Data Management Equipment ” means any equipment, computer hardware, computer software, computer networking equipment, printers, fax machines, copiers, document scanners, data tape systems, data tapes, DVDs, CDs, flash drives, telecommunications and check processing equipment and any other electronic storage media owned by the Failed Bank at Bank Closing Date which is, was, or could have been used by the Failed Bank in connection with data management activities.

Payment Date ” means the first Business Day after the Bank Closing Date.

Person ” means any individual, corporation, partnership, joint venture, association, limited liability company, limited liability partnership, joint-stock company, trust, unincorporated organization, or government or any agency or political subdivision thereof, excluding the Corporation.

“Personal Computer(s)” means computers based on a microprocessor generally designed to be used by one person at a time and which usually store informational data on that computer’s internal hard drive or attached peripheral, and associated peripherals (such as keyboard, mouse, etc.). A personal computer can be found in various configurations such as laptops, net books, and desktops.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 8 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Primary Indemnitor ” means any Person (other than the Assuming Institution or any of its Affiliates) who is obligated to indemnify or insure, or otherwise make payments (including payments on account of claims made against) to or on behalf of any Person in connection with the claims covered under Article XII, including without limitation any insurer issuing any directors and officers liability policy or any Person issuing a financial institution bond or banker’s blanket bond.

Pro Forma ” means a balance sheet that reflects a reasonably accurate financial statement of the Failed Bank through the Bank Closing Date and serves as a basis for the opening entries of both the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

“Proprietary Software” means computer software developed for and owned by the Failed Bank for its own purpose and use.

Put Date ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.4(d).

Put Notice ” has the meaning set forth in Section 3.4(c).

Qualified Beneficiaries ” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.12.

Qualified Financial Contract ” means a qualified financial contract as defined in 12 U.S.C. § 1821(e)(8)(D).

Receiver ” has the meaning set forth in the introduction to this Agreement.

Related Liability ” with respect to any Acquired Asset means any liability existing and reflected on the Failed Bank Records as of the Bank Closing Date for (i) indebtedness secured by mortgages, deeds of trust, chattel mortgages, security interests or other liens on or affecting such Acquired Asset, (ii) ad valorem taxes applicable to such Acquired Asset and (iii) any other obligation determined by the Receiver to be directly related to such Acquired Asset.

Related Liability Amount ” with respect to any Related Liability on the books of the Assuming Institution, means the amount of such Related Liability as stated on the Failed Bank Records of the Assuming Institution (as maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles) as of the date as of which the Related Liability Amount is being determined. With respect to a liability that relates to more than one Acquired Asset, the amount of such Related Liability shall be allocated among such Acquired Assets for the purpose of determining the Related Liability Amount with respect to any one of such Acquired Assets.

Such allocation shall be made by specific allocation, where determinable, and otherwise shall be pro rata based upon the dollar amount of such Acquired Assets stated on the Failed Bank Records of the entity that owns such Acquired Asset.

Repurchase Price ” means, an amount equal to the sum of (i) the purchase price of the Acquired Asset as determined pursuant to Section 3.2 and either (ii) minus the pro rata Acquired Asset discount or plus the pro rata Acquired Asset premium, if any, (ii) adjusted (A) for any

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 9 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


advances and interest on such Acquired Asset after the Bank Closing Date and (B) minus the total amount received by the Assuming Institution for such Acquired Asset after the Bank Closing Date, regardless of how applied (iii) plus total disbursements of principal made by the Receiver not otherwise included in the Book Value. For (x) New Loans, Deposit Secured Loans and Eligible Overdrafts put back to the Receiver pursuant to Section 3.4 or (y) Acquired Assets sold pursuant to Section 3.7 and repurchased by the Receiver pursuant to Section 3.6, the Repurchase Price shall not take into account the pro rata Acquired Asset discount or premium, if any. The Repurchase Price for Eligible Overdrafts shall include adjustments for credits or deposits received after the Bank Closing Date and prior to the date of put back.

Safe Deposit Boxes ” means the safe deposit boxes of the Failed Bank, if any, including the removable safe deposit boxes and safe deposit stacks in the Failed Bank’s vault(s), all rights and benefits under rental agreements with respect to such safe deposit boxes, and all keys and combinations thereto.

Settlement Date ” means the first Business Day immediately prior to the day which is three hundred sixty-five (365) days after the Bank Closing Date, or such other date prior thereto as may be agreed upon by the Receiver and the Assuming Institution. The Receiver, in its discretion, may extend the Settlement Date.

Settlement Interest Rate ” means, for the first calendar quarter or portion thereof during which interest accrues, the rate determined by the Receiver to be equal to the investment rate on twenty-six (26)-week United States Treasury Bills as published on the Bank Closing Date by the United States Treasury on the TreasuryDirect.gov website; provided, that if no such Investment Rate is published the week of the Bank Closing Date, the investment rate for such Treasury Bills most recently published by the United States Treasury on TreasuryDirect.gov prior to the Bank Closing Date shall be used. Thereafter, the rate shall be adjusted to the rate determined by the Receiver to be equal to the Investment Rate on such Treasury Bills in effect as of the first day of each succeeding calendar quarter during which interest accrues as published by the United States Treasury on the TreasuryDirect.gov website.

“Specialty Assets” means assets that have a greater value than more traditional furniture and equipment owned by the Failed Bank and reflected on the Failed Bank Records as of the Bank Closing Date and located on or at Bank Premises, including without limitation fine art and high end decorative art; classic and antique motor vehicles; rare books; rare coins; airplanes; boats; jewelry; collectible firearms; cultural artifacts; sculptures; Proprietary Software; and any other items that typically cannot be appraised by a Furniture and Equipment appraiser. Specialty Assets does not include any repossessed collateral.

“Subsequently Occupied Space” has the meaning set forth in Section 4.6(f).

Subsidiary ” has the meaning set forth in § 3(w)(4) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1813(w)(4), as amended.

“Underserved Area” means a census track designated as an underserved middle-income nonmetropolitan track on the most recent List of Middle-Income Non-Metropolitan Distressed or Underserved Geographies as published by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (“FFIEC”) on the FFIEC website. A list of Bank Premises, if any, located in an Underserved Market is attached as Schedule 4.1(b).

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 10 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


ARTICLE II. ASSUMPTION OF LIABILITIES .

2.1. Liabilities Assumed by Assuming Institution . The Assuming Institution expressly assumes at Book Value (subject to adjustment pursuant to Article VIII) and agrees to pay, perform and discharge, all of the following liabilities of the Failed Bank as of the Bank Closing Date, except as otherwise provided in this Agreement (such liabilities referred to as “ Liabilities Assumed ”):

(a) Assumed Deposits, except those Deposits specifically listed on Schedule 2.1(a) ; provided, that as to any Deposits of public money which are Assumed Deposits, the Assuming Institution agrees to properly secure such Deposits with such Acquired Assets as appropriate which, prior to the Bank Closing Date, were pledged as security by the Failed Bank, or with assets of the Assuming Institution, if such securing Acquired Assets, if any, are insufficient to properly secure such Deposits;

(b) liabilities for indebtedness incurred by the Failed Bank, reflected on the Accounting Records of the Failed Bank on the Bank Closing Date, and secured by any perfected Lien on or affecting any Acquired Asset; provided, that the amount of any liability assumed pursuant to this Section 2.1(b) (x) shall be limited to the market value (as determined by the Receiver) of the Acquired Assets securing such liability and (y) is not subject to adjustment pursuant to Article VIII;

(c) all borrowings from, and obligations and indebtedness to Federal Reserve Banks and Federal Home Loan Banks, if any, whether currently owed, or conditional or not yet matured, including but not limited to, if applicable, (i) advances, including principal, interest, and any prepayment fees, costs and expenses; (ii) letters of credit, including any reimbursement obligations; (iii) acquired member assets programs, including representations, warranties, credit enhancement obligations and servicing obligations; (iv) affordable housing programs, including retention agreements and other contracts and monitoring obligations; (v) swaps and other derivatives; and (vi) safekeeping and custody agreements, provided, that the assumption of any liability pursuant to this Section 2.1(c) shall be limited to the market value of the assets securing such liability as determined by the Receiver; and overdrafts, debit balances, service charges, reclamations and adjustments to accounts with the Federal Reserve Banks as reflected on the books and records of any such Federal Reserve Bank within ninety (90) days after the Bank Closing Date, if any;

(d) ad valorem taxes (prorated through the Bank Closing Date or with respect to Bank Premises prorated through the date the Receiver receives the purchase price for such Bank Premises from the Assuming Institution), whether or not reflected on the Failed Bank Records, applicable to any Acquired Asset; provided, that the assumption of any ad valorem taxes pursuant to this Section 2.1(d) shall be limited to an amount equal to the market value of the Acquired Asset to which such taxes apply as determined by the Receiver;

(e) liabilities, if any, for federal funds purchased, repurchase agreements and overdrafts in accounts maintained with other depository institutions (including any accrued and

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 11 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


unpaid interest thereon computed to and including the Bank Closing Date); provided, that the assumption of any liability pursuant to this Section 2.1(e) shall be limited to the market value of the Acquired Assets securing such liability as determined by the Receiver;

(f) United States Treasury tax and loan note option accounts, if any;

(g) liabilities for any acceptance or commercial letter of credit provided, that the assumption of any liability pursuant to this Section 2.1(g) shall be limited to the market value of the Acquired Assets securing such liability as determined by the Receiver;

(h) liabilities for any “standby letters of credit” as defined in 12 C.F.R. § 337.2(a) issued by the Failed Bank in connection with an Acquired Asset, but excluding any other standby letters of credit;

(i) duties and obligations assumed pursuant to this Agreement including without limitation those relating to the Failed Bank Records, credit card business, debit card business, stored value and gift card business, overdraft protection plans, safe deposit business, safekeeping business and trust business, if any;

(j) liabilities, if any, for Commitments with respect to Loans that are purchased pursuant to this Agreement;

(k) liabilities, if any, for amounts owed to any Acquired Subsidiary;

(l) liabilities, if any, with respect to Qualified Financial Contracts;

(m) [reserved];

(n) any deferred revenue, income or fees recorded on the general ledger of the Failed Bank as of the Bank Closing Date attributable to any business assumed pursuant to Section 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, or 4.5 of this Agreement, excluding any deferred income or revenue relative to FASB 91 – Loan Fees and Costs associated with originating or acquiring Loans and initial direct costs of leases.

2.2. Interest on Deposit Liabilities . The Assuming Institution agrees that, from and after the Bank Closing Date, it will accrue and pay interest on Assumed Deposits pursuant to Section 2.1 at a rate(s) it shall determine; provided, that for non-transaction Deposit liabilities such rate(s) shall not be less than the lowest rate offered by the Assuming Institution to its depositors for non-transaction deposit accounts. The Assuming Institution shall permit each depositor to withdraw, without penalty for early withdrawal, all or any portion of such depositor’s Deposit, whether or not the Assuming Institution elects to pay interest in accordance with any deposit agreement formerly existing between the Failed Bank and such depositor; and further provided, that if such Deposit has been pledged to secure an obligation of the depositor or other party, any withdrawal thereof shall be subject to the terms of the agreement governing such pledge. The Assuming Institution shall give notice to such depositors as provided in Section 5.3 of the rate(s) of interest which it has determined to pay and of such withdrawal rights.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 12 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


2.3. Unclaimed Deposits .

(a) Final Legal Notice . Fifteen (15) months following the Bank Closing Date, the Assuming Institution will provide the Receiver a listing of all deposit accounts, including the type of account, not claimed by the depositor. The Receiver will review the list and authorize the Assuming Institution to act on behalf of the Receiver to send a Final Legal Notice in a form substantially similar to Exhibit 2.3A (the “ Final Legal Notice ”) to the owner(s) of the unclaimed deposits reminding them of the need to claim or arrange to continue their account(s) with the Assuming Institution. The Assuming Institution will send the Final Legal Notice to the depositors within thirty (30) days following notification of the Receiver’s authorization. The Assuming Institution will prepare an Affidavit of Mailing in a form substantially similar to Exhibit 2.3B and will forward the Affidavit of Mailing to the Receiver after mailing out the Final Legal Notice to the owner(s) of unclaimed deposit accounts.

(b) Unclaimed Deposits . If, within eighteen (18) months after the Bank Closing Date, any depositor of the Failed Bank does not claim or arrange to continue such depositor’s Assumed Deposits at the Assuming Institution, the Assuming Institution shall, within fifteen (15) Business Days after the end of such eighteen (18) month period, (i) refund to the Receiver the full amount of each such Deposit (without reduction for service charges), (ii) provide to the Receiver a schedule of all such refunded Deposits in such form as may be prescribed by the Receiver, and (iii) assign, transfer, convey, and deliver to the Receiver, all right, title and interest of the Assuming Institution in and to the Failed Bank Records previously transferred to the Assuming Institution and other records generated or maintained by the Assuming Institution pertaining to such Deposits. During such eighteen (18) month period, at the request of the Receiver, the Assuming Institution promptly shall provide to the Receiver schedules of unclaimed Deposits in such form as may be prescribed by the Receiver.

2.4. Employee Plans . Except as provided in Section 4.12, the Assuming Institution shall have no liabilities, obligations or responsibilities under the Failed Bank’s health care, bonus, vacation, pension, profit sharing, deferred compensation, 401k or stock purchase plans or similar plans, if any, unless the Receiver and the Assuming Institution agree otherwise subsequent to the date of this Agreement.

ARTICLE III. PURCHASE OF ASSETS .

3.1. Assets Purchased by Assuming Institution . Subject to Sections 3.5 and 3.6, the Assuming Institution hereby purchases from the Receiver, and the Receiver hereby sells, assigns, transfers, conveys, and delivers to the Assuming Institution, all right, title, and interest of the Receiver in and to all of the following:

(a) cash and receivables from depository institutions (including Federal Reserve Banks and Federal Home Loan Banks), including cash items in the process of collection, plus any accrued interest thereon computed to and including Bank Closing Date;

(b) securities (other than the capital stock of Subsidiaries of the Failed Bank and those securities referred to in Section 3.5(l), if any), plus any accrued interest thereon computed to and including Bank Closing Date;

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 13 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(c) federal funds sold and repurchase agreements, if any, including any accrued interest thereon computed to and including Bank Closing Date;

(d) Owned Data Management Equipment and Personal Computers;

(e) Deposit Secured Loans, if any (including any such Deposit Secured Loan that the Failed Bank charged-off in whole or in part during the period from the date after the Bid Valuation Date and up to and including Bank Closing Date);

(f) any credit card business (including all outstanding extensions of credit), Safe Deposit Boxes and related business, safekeeping business and trust business, subject to Section 4.2, 4.3, 4.4 or 4.5, respectively;

(g) Failed Bank Records and other documents as provided in Section 6.1;

(h) reserved;

(i) amounts owed to the Failed Bank by any Acquired Subsidiary;

(j) assets securing Deposits of public money, to the extent not otherwise purchased hereunder;

(k) overdrafts of customers (including but not limited to overdrafts made pursuant to an overdraft protection plan or similar extensions of credit in connection with a deposit account);

(l) rights, if any, with respect to Qualified Financial Contracts;

(m) reserved;

(n) the Loans and other assets in the Optional Loan Pools listed on Schedule 3.1(n);

( o) reserved;

(p) any asset that was fully charged-off by the Failed Bank prior to the Bid Valuation Date (including any subsequent judgments arising therefrom) that was secured by collateral that was (i) foreclosed upon by the Failed Bank and (ii) is an Acquired Asset; and

(q) New Loans.

The Assuming Institution purchases all Acquired Assets subject to all liabilities for indebtedness collateralized by Liens affecting such Acquired Assets to the extent provided in Section 2.1.

3.2. Asset Purchase Price .

(a) Determination of Asset Purchase Price . All Acquired Assets and assets of the Failed Bank subject to an option to purchase by the Assuming Institution shall be purchased for the amount, or the amount resulting from the method specified for determining the amount, as specified on Schedule 3.2 , except as otherwise may be provided herein. Any Acquired Asset

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 14 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


for which no purchase price is specified on Schedule 3.2 or otherwise herein shall be purchased at its Book Value. The purchase price for Acquired Subsidiaries shall be adjusted pursuant to Section 4.6(i)(iv), if applicable.

(b) Purchase Price for Securities . The purchase price for any security (other than the capital stock of any Acquired Subsidiary and Federal Home Loan Bank stock) purchased under Section 3.1 by the Assuming Institution shall consist of the market price (as defined below) of the security as of the Bank Closing Date, multiplied by the bank’s ownership interest in the security (see Calculation of Purchase Price below) and shall include accrued interest, where applicable, as noted below.

(i) Definition of Market Price : The market price for any security shall be (i) the market price for that security quoted at the close of the trading day effective on the Bank Closing Date as published electronically by Bloomberg, L.P., or alternatively, at the discretion of the Receiver, by IDC/Financial Times (FT) Interactive Data; (ii) provided that if such market price is not available for such security, the Assuming Institution will submit a written purchase price bid for such security within three days of notification/bid request by the Receiver (unless a different time period is agreed to by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver) and the Receiver, in its sole and absolute discretion, will accept or reject each such purchase price bid; (iii) further provided that in the absence of an acceptable bid from the Assuming Institution, or in the event that a security is deemed essential to the Receiver as determined by the Receiver in its discretion (see Section 3.6 Retention or Repurchase of Assets Essential to the Receiver) such security shall not pass to the Assuming Institution and shall be deemed to be an excluded asset hereunder and listed on Schedule 3.5(l) .

(ii) Calculation of Purchase Price . The bank’s ownership interest in a security will be quantified one of two ways: (i) number of shares or other units, as applicable (in the case of equity securities) or (ii) par value or notational amount, as applicable (in the case of non-equity securities). As a result, the purchase price (except where determined pursuant to clause (ii) of the preceding paragraph) shall be calculated one of two ways, depending on whether or not the security is an equity security: (i) the purchase price for an equity security shall be calculated by multiplying the number of shares or other units by the applicable market price per unit; and (ii) the purchase price for a non-equity security shall be an amount equal to the applicable market price (expressed as a decimal), multiplied by the par value for such security (based on the payment factor most recently widely available). The purchase price also shall include accrued interest as calculated below (see Calculation of Accrued Interest), except to the extent the parties may otherwise expressly agree, pursuant to clause (ii) of the preceding paragraph. If the factor used to determine the par value of any security for purposes of calculating the purchase price, is not for the period in which the Bank Closing Date occurs, then the purchase price for that security shall be subject to adjustment post-closing based on a “cancel and correct” procedure. Under this procedure, after such current factor becomes publicly available, the Receiver will recalculate the purchase price utilizing the current factor and related interest rate, and will notify the Assuming Institution of any difference and of the applicable amount due from one party to the other. Such amount will then be paid as part of the settlement process pursuant to Article VIII.

(iii) Calculation of Accrued Interest for Securities : Accrued interest shall be calculated for a non-equity security by multiplying the interest rate (expressed as a decimal point) paid on the security as then most recently publicly available, by the most recent par value (or notational amount, as applicable) of that security, multiplied by the number of days from and including the first interest day of the accrual period in which the Bank Closing Date occurs, through the Bank Closing Date.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 15 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(c) Purchase Price for Qualified Financial Contracts . Qualified Financial Contracts, if any, shall be purchased at market value determined in accordance with the terms of Exhibit 3.2(c) . Any costs associated with such valuation shall be shared equally by the Receiver and the Assuming Institution.

3.3. Manner of Conveyance; Limited Warranty; Nonrecourse; Etc. THE CONVEYANCE OF ALL ACQUIRED ASSETS, INCLUDING REAL AND PERSONAL PROPERTY INTERESTS, PURCHASED BY THE ASSUMING INSTITUTION UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE MADE, AS NECESSARY, BY RECEIVER’S DEED OR RECEIVER’S BILL OF SALE, AS IS , WHERE IS , WITHOUT RECOURSE AND, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT, WITHOUT ANY WARRANTIES WHATSOEVER WITH RESPECT TO SUCH ACQUIRED ASSETS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH RESPECT TO TITLE, VALUE, COLLECTIBILITY, GENUINENESS, ENFORCEABILITY, DOCUMENTATION, CONDITION OR FREEDOM FROM LIENS OR ENCUMBRANCES (IN WHOLE OR IN PART), OR ANY OTHER MATTERS.

3.4. Puts of Assets to the Receiver .

(a) Puts Within 30 Days or 40 Days After the Bank Closing Date .

(i) During the thirty (30)-day period following the Bank Closing Date (which thirty (30)-day period may be extended in writing in the sole and absolute discretion of the Receiver for any Loan), in accordance with this Section 3.4, the Assuming Institution may require the Receiver to purchase (x) any Deposit Secured Loan transferred to the Assuming Institution pursuant to Section 3.1 which is not fully secured by Assumed Deposits or deposits at other insured depository institutions due to either insufficient Assumed Deposit or deposit collateral or deficient documentation regarding such collateral or (y) any New Loan; provided that, the Assuming Institution may not require the purchase of a Deposit Secured Loan that is secured by an Assumed Deposit until any Deposit setoff determination, whether voluntary or involuntary, has been made.

(ii) During the forty (40)-day period following the Bank Closing Date, the Assuming Institution may require the Receiver to purchase, any Eligible Overdraft transferred to the Assuming Institution pursuant to Section 3.1 which existed on the thirtieth (30th) day following the Bank Closing Date.

(iii) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Assuming Institution may not require the Receiver to purchase any Loan pursuant to Section 3.4(a) if (x) the Obligor with respect to such Loan is an Acquired Subsidiary or (y) the Assuming Institution has:

(A) made any advance in accordance with the terms of a Commitment or otherwise with respect to such Loan;

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 16 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(B) taken any action that caused an increase in the amount of a Related Liability with respect to such Loan;

(C) created or permitted to be created any Lien on such Loan which secures indebtedness for money borrowed or which constitutes a conditional sales agreement, capital lease or other title retention agreement;

(D) entered into, agreed to make, grant or permit, or made, granted or permitted any modification or amendment to, any waiver or extension with respect to, or any renewal, refinancing or refunding of, such Loan or related Credit Documents or collateral, including, without limitation, any act or omission which diminished such collateral; or

(E) sold, assigned or transferred all or a portion of such Loan to a third party (whether with or without recourse).

(b) Puts Prior to the Settlement Date . During the period from the Bank Closing Date to and including the Business Day immediately preceding the Settlement Date, the Assuming Institution may require the Receiver to purchase any Acquired Asset which the Assuming Institution can establish is evidenced by forged or stolen instruments as of the Bank Closing Date; provided that the Assuming Institution may not require the Receiver to purchase any Acquired Asset with respect to which the Assuming Institution has taken any action referred to in Section 3.4(a)(iii) with respect to such Acquired Asset. The Assuming Institution shall transfer all such Acquired Assets to the Receiver without recourse, and shall indemnify the Receiver against any and all claims of any Person claiming by, through or under the Assuming Institution with respect to any such Acquired Asset, as provided in Section 12.4.

(c) Notices to the Receiver . If the Assuming Institution elects to require the Receiver to purchase one or more Acquired Assets pursuant to this Section 3.4, the Assuming Institution shall deliver to the Receiver a notice (“ Put Notice ”) which shall include:

(i) a list of all Acquired Assets that the Assuming Institution requires the Receiver to purchase;

(ii) a list of all Related Liabilities with respect to the Acquired Assets identified in the Put Notice; and

(iii) a statement of the estimated Repurchase Price of each Acquired Asset identified in the Put Notice as of the applicable Put Date (defined below).

The Put Notice shall be in the form prescribed by the Receiver or such other form to which the Receiver has consented. As provided in Section 9.6, the Assuming Institution shall deliver to the Receiver all documents, Credit Files and additional information relating to the subject matter of the Put Notice as the Receiver may request and shall provide the Receiver with full access to all other relevant books and records.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 17 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(d) Purchase by Receiver . The Receiver shall purchase Acquired Assets that are specified in the Put Notice and shall assume Related Liabilities with respect to such Acquired Assets. The transfer of such Acquired Assets and Related Liabilities shall be effective as of a date determined by the Receiver, which date shall not be later than thirty (30) days after receipt by the Receiver of the Put Notice (the Put Date ).

(e) Purchase Price and Payment Date . Each Acquired Asset purchased by the Receiver pursuant to this Section 3.4 shall be purchased at a price equal to the Repurchase Price of such Acquired Asset minus the Related Liability Amount applicable to such Acquired Asset, in each case determined as of the applicable Put Date. If the difference between the Repurchase Price and the Related Liability Amount is positive, then the Receiver shall pay to the Assuming Institution the amount of the difference; if the difference between such amounts is negative, then the Assuming Institution shall pay to the Receiver the amount of the difference. The Assuming Institution or the Receiver, as the case may be, shall pay the amount determined pursuant to this Section 3.4 not later than the twentieth (20th) Business Day following the applicable Put Date, together with interest on such amount at the Settlement Interest Rate for the period from and including such Put Date to and including the day preceding the date on which payment is made.

(f) Servicing . The Assuming Institution shall administer and manage any Acquired Asset subject to purchase by the Receiver in accordance with usual and prudent banking standards and business practices until the Receiver purchases such Acquired Asset.

(g) Reversals . If the Receiver purchases an Acquired Asset (and assumes the Related Liability) that it is not required to purchase pursuant to this Section 3.4, the Assuming Institution shall repurchase such Acquired Asset (and assume such Related Liability) from the Receiver at a price computed so as to achieve the same economic result as would apply if the Receiver had never purchased such Acquired Asset pursuant to this Section 3.4.

(h) Transfer to Receiver without Recourse . The Assuming Institution shall transfer any Acquired Asset pursuant to this Section 3.4 to the Receiver without recourse and shall indemnify the Receiver against any and all claims of any Person claiming by, through or under the Assuming Institution with respect to any such Acquired Asset, as provided in Section 12.4.

3.5. Assets Not Purchased by Assuming Institution . The Assuming Institution does not purchase, acquire or assume, or (except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement) obtain an option to purchase, acquire or assume under this Agreement:

(a) any financial institution bonds, banker’s blanket bonds, or public liability, fire, extended coverage insurance policy, bank owned life insurance or any other insurance policy of the Failed Bank, or premium refund, unearned premium derived from cancellation, or any proceeds payable with respect to any of the foregoing;

(b) any interest, right, action, claim, or judgment against (i) any officer, director, employee, accountant, attorney, or any other Person employed or retained by the Failed Bank or any Subsidiary of the Failed Bank on or prior to the Bank Closing Date arising out of any act or omission of such Person in such capacity, (ii) any underwriter of financial institution

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 18 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


bonds, banker’s blanket bonds or any other insurance policy of the Failed Bank, (iii) any shareholder or holding company of the Failed Bank, or (iv) any other Person whose action or inaction may be related to any loss (exclusive of any loss resulting from such Person’s failure to pay on a Loan made by the Failed Bank) incurred by the Failed Bank; provided that for the purposes hereof, the acts, omissions or other events giving rise to any such claim shall have occurred on or before the Bank Closing Date, regardless of when any such claim is discovered and regardless of whether any such claim is made with respect to a financial institution bond, banker’s blanket bond, or any other insurance policy of the Failed Bank in force as of the Bank Closing Date;

(c) prepaid regulatory assessments of the Failed Bank, if any;

(d) legal or equitable interests in tax receivables of the Failed Bank, if any, including any claims arising as a result of the Failed Bank having entered into any agreement or otherwise being joined with another Person with respect to the filing of tax returns or the payment of taxes;

(e) amounts reflected on the Failed Bank Records as of the Bank Closing Date as a general or specific loss reserve or contingency account, if any;

(f) leased or owned Bank Premises and leased or owned Fixtures, Proprietary Software, Furniture and Equipment located on leased or owned Bank Premises, and Specialty Assets located on leased or owned Bank Premises, if any; provided that the Assuming Institution does obtain an option under Sections 4.6, 4.7 or 4.8, as the case may be, with respect thereto;

(g) owned Bank Premises which the Receiver, in its discretion, determines may contain environmentally hazardous substances;

(h) any “goodwill,” as such term is defined in the instructions to the report of condition prepared by banks examined by the Corporation in accordance with 12 C.F.R. § 304.3, and other intangibles (other than intellectual property);

(i) any criminal restitution or forfeiture orders issued in favor of the Failed Bank;

(j) any and all prepaid fees or any other income as shown on the Failed Bank Records, but not taken into income as of the Bank Closing Date, associated with a line of business of the Failed Bank which is not assumed pursuant to this Agreement;

(k) assets essential to the Receiver in accordance with Section 3.6;

(l) any banker’s bank stock, and the securities listed on the attached Schedule 3.5(l) and assets shown as specifically excluded from Pools on Schedule 3.1(n);

(m) reserved;

(n) prepaid accounts associated with any contract or agreement that the Assuming Institution either does not directly assume pursuant to the terms of this Agreement nor has an option to assume under Section 4.8;

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 19 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(o) except with respect to any Federal Home Loan Bank loans, any contract pursuant to which the Failed Bank provides loan servicing for others;

(p) all assets that were fully charged-off by the Failed Bank prior to the Bid Valuation Date, including any subsequent judgments arising therefrom, other than any asset that was secured by collateral that was (i) foreclosed upon by the Failed Bank and (ii) is an Acquired Asset;

(q) any Loan that was secured by collateral that is an asset retained by the Receiver under this Agreement; and

(r) all assets related to any plan of the Failed Bank described in Section 2.4 or any plan of the type described in Section 2.4 under which the Failed Bank has any liability, obligation or responsibility, unless the Assuming Institution assumes liability, obligations or responsibilities under such plan subsequent to the date of this Agreement; and

(s) any asset not shown on the Failed Bank Records as of the Bank Closing Date and discovered after the Settlement Date.

3.6. Retention or Repurchase of Assets Essential to Receiver .

(a) The Receiver may refuse to sell to the Assuming Institution, or the Assuming Institution agrees, at the request of the Receiver set forth in a written notice to the Assuming Institution, to sell, assign, transfer, convey, and deliver to the Receiver, all of the Assuming Institution’s right, title and interest in and to, any Acquired Asset or asset essential to the Receiver as determined by the Receiver in its discretion (together with all Credit Documents evidencing or pertaining thereto), which may include any Acquired Asset or asset that the Receiver determines to be:

(i) made to an officer, director, or other Person engaging in the affairs of the Failed Bank, its Subsidiaries or Affiliates or any related entities of any of the foregoing;

(ii) the subject of any investigation relating to any claim with respect to any item described in Section 3.5(a) or (b), or the subject of, or potentially the subject of, any legal proceedings;

(iii) made to a Person who is an Obligor on a loan owned by the Receiver or the Corporation in its corporate capacity or its capacity as receiver of any institution;

(iv) secured by collateral which also secures any asset owned by the Receiver; or

(v) related to any asset of the Failed Bank not purchased by the Assuming Institution under this Article III or any liability of the Failed Bank not assumed by the Assuming Institution under Article II.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 20 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(b) Each such Acquired Asset or asset purchased by the Receiver shall be purchased at a price equal to the Repurchase Price thereof less the Related Liability Amount with respect to any Related Liabilities related to such Acquired Asset or asset, in each case determined as of the date of the notice provided by the Receiver pursuant to Section 3.6(a). The Receiver shall pay the Assuming Institution not later than the twentieth (20th) Business Day following receipt of related Credit Documents and Credit Files together with interest on such amount at the Settlement Interest Rate for the period from and including the date of receipt of such documents to and including the day preceding the day on which payment is made. The Assuming Institution agrees to administer and manage each such Acquired Asset or asset in accordance with usual and prudent banking standards and business practices until each such Acquired Asset or asset is purchased by the Receiver. All transfers with respect to Acquired Asset or assets under this Section 3.6 shall be made as provided in Section 9.6. The Assuming Institution shall transfer all such Acquired Assets or assets and Related Liabilities to the Receiver without recourse, and shall indemnify the Receiver against any and all claims of any Person claiming by, through or under the Assuming Institution with respect to any such Acquired Asset or asset, as provided in Section 12.4.

3.7. Receiver’s Offer to Sell Withheld Loans . For the period of thirty (30) days commencing the day after the Bank Closing Date, the Receiver may, in its sole and absolute discretion, sell any Loan withheld from sale pursuant to Section 3.5 or Section 3.6 of this Agreement that the Assuming Institution desires to purchase. Any Loan sold pursuant to this section will, at the sole and absolute discretion of the Receiver, either (x) be treated as if initially sold pursuant to Section 3.1 of this Agreement, or (y) sold pursuant to the standard loan sale agreement used by the Receiver for the sale of loan pools.

(a) If treated as if initially sold pursuant to Section 3.1 of this Agreement, the purchase price for such Loan shall be the Book Value as of the Bank Closing Date, adjusted (i) for any advances and interest on such Loan after the Bank Closing Date, (ii) by subtracting the total amount received by the Assuming Institution for such Loan after the Bank Closing Date, and (iii) by adding total disbursements of principal made by the Receiver and not otherwise included in the Book Value. The sale will be subject to all applicable terms of this Agreement, except that any Loan purchased pursuant to this Section 3.7 shall not be included in the calculation of the pro rata Acquired Asset discount or pro rata Acquired Asset premium utilized for the repurchase of other Acquired Assets. Payment for any such Loan will be handled through the settlement process pursuant to Article VIII.

(b) Any Loan sold pursuant to the standard loan sale agreement shall be governed by and paid for in accordance with that document

ARTICLE IV. ASSUMPTION OF CERTAIN DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS .

4.1. Continuation of Banking Business .

(a) Full Service Banking . For the period commencing on the first Business Day after the Bank Closing Date and ending one hundred and eighty (180) days from the Bank Closing Date, the Assuming Institution will provide full service banking in the Failed Bank Assessment Area. At the option of the Assuming Institution, it may provide such full service banking at one or more Bank Premises or Assuming Institution branches located within such

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 21 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Failed Bank Assessment Area. The Assuming Institution may close or sell any Bank Premises during this period with the prior written consent of the Receiver (which consent may be withheld in Receiver’s sole discretion) and after receipt of all necessary regulatory approvals, provided that the Assuming Institution (or its successors) continues to provide full service banking in the Failed Bank Assessment Area for the period required to comply with this Section 4.1(a).

(b) Bank Premises Located in an Underserved Area . If a currently utilized Bank Premises is located in an Underserved Area, the Receiver will not consent to the Assuming Institution’s closing or selling such Bank Premises, unless the Assuming Institution provides full service banking at one or more Bank Premises or Assuming Institution branches located within in the same Underserved Area.

(c) Failure to Exercise Option to Purchase Bank Premises . If a currently-utilized owned Bank Premises is located in an Underserved Area and the Assuming Institution does not exercise its option under Section 4.6(a) with respect to that Bank Premises, the Receiver will continue to rent any such owned Bank Premises to the Assuming Institution for the amount provided in Section 4.6(e) in order to comply with Section 4.1(a).

(d) Reserved .

4.2. Credit Card Business . The Assuming Institution agrees to honor and perform, from and after the Bank Closing Date, all duties and obligations with respect to the Failed Bank’s credit card business (including issuer or merchant acquirer) debit card business, stored value and gift card business, and/or processing related to credit cards, if any, and assumes all extensions of credit or balances outstanding as of the Bank Closing Date with respect to these lines of business. The obligations undertaken pursuant to this Section do not include loyalty, reward, affinity, or other similar programs related to the credit and debit card businesses.

4.3. Safe Deposit Business . The Assuming Institution assumes and agrees to discharge, from and after the Bank Closing Date, in the usual course of conducting a banking business, the duties and obligations of the Failed Bank with respect to all Safe Deposit Boxes, if any, of the Failed Bank and to maintain all of the necessary facilities for the use of such boxes by the renters thereof during the period for which such boxes have been rented and the rent therefor paid to the Failed Bank, subject to the provisions of the rental agreements between the Failed Bank and the respective renters of such boxes; provided, that the Assuming Institution may relocate the Safe Deposit Boxes of the Failed Bank to any office of the Assuming Institution located in the Failed Bank Assessment Area in which such Safe Deposit Boxes were located. The Safe Deposit Boxes shall be located and maintained in such Failed Bank Assessment Area for a minimum of one year from the Bank Closing Date.

4.4. Safekeeping Business . The Receiver transfers, conveys and delivers to the Assuming Institution and the Assuming Institution accepts all securities and other items, if any, held by the Failed Bank in safekeeping for its customers as of the Bank Closing Date. The Assuming Institution assumes and agrees to honor and discharge, from and after the Bank Closing Date, the duties and obligations of the Failed Bank with respect to such securities and items held in safekeeping. The Assuming Institution shall provide to the Receiver written verification of all assets held by the Failed Bank for safekeeping within

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 22 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


sixty (60) days after the Bank Closing Date. The assets held for safekeeping by the Failed Bank shall be held and maintained by the Assuming Institution in the Failed Bank Assessment Area for a minimum of one year from the Bank Closing Date. At the option of the Assuming Institution, the safekeeping business may be provided at any or all of the Bank Premises, or at other premises within the Failed Bank Assessment Area. The Assuming Institution shall be entitled to all rights and benefits which accrue after the Bank Closing Date with respect to securities and other items held in safekeeping.

4.5. Trust Business .

(a) Assuming Institution as Successor . The Assuming Institution shall, without further transfer, substitution, act or deed, to the full extent permitted by law, succeed to the rights, obligations, properties, assets, investments, deposits, agreements, and trusts of the Failed Bank under trusts, executorships, administrations, guardianships, and agencies, and other fiduciary or representative capacities, all to the same extent as though the Assuming Institution had assumed the same from the Failed Bank prior to the Bank Closing Date; provided, that any liability based on the misfeasance, malfeasance or nonfeasance of the Failed Bank, its directors, officers, employees or agents with respect to the trust business is not assumed hereunder.

(b) Wills and Appointments . The Assuming Institution shall, to the full extent permitted by law, succeed to, and be entitled to take and execute, the appointment to all executorships, trusteeships, guardianships and other fiduciary or representative capacities to which the Failed Bank is or may be named in wills, whenever probated, or to which the Failed Bank is or may be named or appointed by any other instrument.

(c) Transfer of Trust Business . In the event additional proceedings of any kind are necessary to accomplish the transfer of such trust business, the Assuming Institution agrees that, at its own expense, it will take whatever action is necessary to accomplish such transfer. The Receiver agrees to use reasonable efforts to assist the Assuming Institution in accomplishing such transfer.

(d) Verification of Assets . The Assuming Institution shall provide to the Receiver written verification of the assets held in connection with the Failed Bank’s trust business within sixty (60) days after the Bank Closing Date.

4.6. Bank Premises .

(a) Option to Purchase .

(i) Subject to Section 3.5, the Receiver hereby grants to the Assuming Institution an exclusive option for the period of sixty (60) days commencing the day after the Bank Closing Date with respect to Bank Premises for which the Assuming Institution declined its option to purchase at a fixed price as shown on the Bid Form, and for a period of ninety (90) days commencing the day after the Bank Closing Date with respect to all other owned Bank Premises to purchase any or all owned Bank Premises, including all Fixtures and all Furniture and Equipment located on or at the Bank Premises. The Assuming Institution shall give written notice to the Receiver within the option period of its election to purchase or not to purchase any of the owned Bank Premises. Any purchase of such Bank Premises shall be effective as of the date the Receiver receives the

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 23 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


purchase price for such Bank Premises from the Assuming Institution, and such purchase shall be consummated as soon as practicable thereafter (and no later than the Settlement Date).

(ii) The Receiver may, in its sole and absolute discretion, manage and maintain any owned Bank Premises with one or more tenants (other than the Assuming Institution) during the period from the Bank Closing Date until the date the Receiver receives the purchase price for such Bank Premises from the Assuming Institution.

(b) Option to Lease . The Receiver hereby grants to the Assuming Institution an exclusive option for the period of sixty (60) days commencing the day after the Bank Closing Date to cause the Receiver to assign to the Assuming Institution any or all leases for leased Bank Premises, if any, to the extent such leases can be assigned; provided that the exercise of this option with respect to any lease must be as to all premises or other property subject to such lease. To the extent the lease payments provided for in any assigned lease are minimal in relation to the current market rate, and the value of that difference is not otherwise reflected in the purchase of the associated Fixtures, the Assuming Institution shall pay the Receiver the Fair Market Value of the Receiver’s interest in any such assigned lease. The Assuming Institution shall give notice to the Receiver within the option period of its election to accept or not to accept an assignment of any or all leases (or enter into new leases in lieu thereof). The Assuming Institution shall assume all leases assigned (or enter into new leases in lieu thereof) pursuant to this Section 4.6.

(c) Facilitation . The Receiver shall facilitate the assumption, assignment or sublease of leases or the negotiation of new leases by the Assuming Institution; provided that neither the Receiver nor the Corporation shall be obligated to engage in litigation, make payments to the Assuming Institution or to any third party in connection with facilitating any such assumption, assignment, sublease or negotiation or commit to any other obligations to third parties.

(d) Notice of Surrender of Bank Premises . The Assuming Institution shall give the Receiver at least fifteen (15) days prior written notice of its intent to surrender to the Receiver any Bank Premises with respect to which the Assuming Institution has not exercised the options provided in Sections 4.6(a) and 4.6(b). Any such notice shall designate the intended Bank Premises Surrender Date and shall terminate the Assuming Institution’s option with respect to such Bank Premises.

(e) Occupancy Costs .

(i) The Assuming Institution shall pay to the Receiver, or to appropriate third parties at the direction of the Receiver, for the period from the Bank Closing Date until the Bank Premises Surrender Date, the following amounts: (A) for owned Bank Premises, the market rental value, as determined by the appraiser selected in accordance with the definition of Fair Market Value, and all operating costs (provided, however, that, for owned Bank Premises the Assuming Institution elects to purchase under Section 4.6(a)(i), (1) the time period shall be from the Bank Closing Date until the date the Receiver receives the purchase price for such Bank Premises from the Assuming Institution, and (2) the amount shall be limited to market rental value and operating costs

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 24 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


for the space not occupied by other tenants), and (B) for leased Bank Premises, all operating costs with respect thereto. The Assuming Institution shall comply with the terms of applicable leases on leased Bank Premises, including without limitation the timely payment of all rent. Operating costs include, without limitation, all taxes, fees, charges, maintenance, utilities, insurance and assessments, to the extent not included in the rental value or rent.

(ii) The Assuming Institution shall pay to the Receiver rent for all owned or leased Furniture and Equipment, all owned or leased Fixtures and all Specialty Assets located on or at the Bank Premises for the period from the Bank Closing Date until the Bank Premises Surrender Date (provided, however, that, for owned Bank Premises the Assuming Institution elects to purchase under Section 4.6(a)(i), (A) the time period shall be from the Bank Closing Date until the date the Receiver receives the purchase price for such Bank Premises from the Assuming Institution, and (B) the amount shall be limited to rent for owned or leased Furniture and Equipment, owned or leased Fixtures and Specialty Assets located on or at the Bank Premises in the space not occupied by other tenants). Rent for such property owned by the Failed Bank shall be the market rental value thereof, as determined by the Receiver within sixty (60) days after the Bank Closing Date. Rent for such property leased by the Failed Bank shall be an amount equal to any and all rent and other amounts which the Receiver incurs or accrues as an obligation or is obligated to pay for such period pursuant to all leases and contracts with respect to such property.

(iii) Subject to Section 4.1, if the Assuming Institution gives notice of its election not to accept an assignment of a lease for one or more of the leased Bank Premises, or not to purchase one or more of the owned Bank Premises, within two Business Days of the Bank Closing Date, and the Receiver is satisfied that all of the conditions for surrender of such Bank Premises set forth in this Agreement have been met within fifteen (15) days of the Bank Closing Date, then, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, the Assuming Institution shall not be liable for any of the costs imposed by this Section 4.6(e).

(f) Certain Requirements as to Fixtures, Furniture and Equipment and Certain Specialty Assets . If the Assuming Institution (i) purchases owned Bank Premises (including any Bank Premises purchased at the fixed price shown on the Bid Form) or (ii) accepts an assignment of the lease (or enters into a sublease or a new lease in lieu thereof) for leased Bank Premises as provided in Section 4.6(a) or 4.6(b), or (iii) does not exercise either such option, but within twelve (12) months following the Bank Closing Date obtains the right to occupy all or any portion of such Bank Premises, whether by assignment, lease, sublease, purchase or otherwise, other than in accordance with Section 4.6(a) or 4.6(b) (each of the preceding, a “Subsequently Occupied Space”), the Assuming Institution shall (A) effective as of the Bank Closing Date, purchase from the Receiver all Fixtures, all Furniture and Equipment, and all Specialty Assets with an appraised value (as determined in accordance with Section 4.6(j)) of less than $10,000 owned by the Failed Bank and located on or at the Subsequently Occupied Space as of the Bank Closing Date at Fair Market Value, (B) accept an assignment or a sublease of the leases or negotiate new leases for all Fixtures and Furniture and Equipment leased by the Failed Bank and located on or at the Subsequently Occupied Space, and (C) if applicable,

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 25 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


accept an assignment or a sublease of any ground lease or negotiate a new ground lease with respect to any land on which the Subsequently Occupied Space is located; provided that the Receiver has not previously disposed of such Fixtures or Furniture and Equipment or Specialty Assets or repudiated the leases referred to in clause (B) or clause (C).

(g) Surrendering Bank Premises .

(i) If the Assuming Institution elects not to purchase any owned Bank Premises, the notice of such election in accordance with Section 4.6(a) shall specify the Bank Premises Surrender Date. The Assuming Institution shall be responsible for promptly relinquishing and releasing to the Receiver such Bank Premises and the Fixtures, the Furniture and Equipment and the Specialty Assets located thereon which existed at the time of the Bank Closing Date, in the same condition as at the Bank Closing Date, and at the Bank Premises where they were inventoried at the Bank Closing Date, normal wear and tear excepted. Any of the aforementioned which is missing will be charged to the Assuming Institution at the item’s Fair Market Value as determined in accordance with this Agreement. By remaining in any such Bank Premises more than 150 days after the Bank Closing Date (unless the Assuming Institution must do so to comply with Section 4.1 and has made appropriate arrangements with the Receiver and all applicable lessors), the Assuming Institution shall, at the Receiver’s option, (x) be deemed to have agreed to purchase such Bank Premises, and to assume all leases, obligations and liabilities with respect to leased Furniture and Equipment and leased Fixtures located thereon and any ground lease with respect to the land on which such Bank Premises are located, and (y) be required to purchase all Fixtures and all Furniture and Equipment owned by the Failed Bank and located on or at the Bank Premises as of the Bank Closing Date.

(ii) If the Assuming Institution elects not to accept an assignment of the lease or sublease of any leased Bank Premises, the notice of such election in accordance with Section 4.6(b) shall specify the Bank Premises Surrender Date. The Assuming Institution shall be responsible for promptly relinquishing and releasing to the Receiver such Bank Premises and the Fixtures, the Furniture and Equipment and the Specialty Assets located thereon which existed at the time of the Bank Closing Date, in the same condition as at the Bank Closing Date, and at the Bank Premises where they were inventoried at the Bank Closing Date, normal wear and tear excepted. Any of the aforementioned which is missing will be charged to the Assuming Institution at the item’s Fair Market Value as determined in accordance with this Agreement. By failing to provide notice of its intention to surrender such Bank Premises prior to the expiration of the option period specified in Section 4.6(b), or by remaining in any such Bank Premises more than 150 days after the Bank Closing Date (unless the Assuming Institution must do so to comply with Section 4.1 and has made appropriate arrangements with the Receiver and all applicable lessors), the Assuming Institution shall, at the Receiver’s option, (x) be deemed to have assumed all leases, obligations and liabilities with respect to such Bank Premises (including any ground lease with respect to the land on which such Bank Premises are located), and leased Furniture and Equipment and leased Fixtures located thereon in accordance with this Section 4.6 (unless the Receiver previously repudiated any such lease), and (y) be required to purchase all Fixtures and all Furniture and Equipment owned by the Failed Bank at Fair Market Value and located on or at the Bank Premises as of the Bank Closing Date.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 26 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(h) Furniture and Equipment and Certain Other Equipment . The Receiver hereby grants to the Assuming Institution an option to purchase all Furniture and Equipment owned by the Failed Bank at Fair Market Value and located at any leased or owned Bank Premises (i) that the Assuming Institution does not elect to purchase pursuant to Section 4.6(a) or (ii) for which Assuming Institution does not elect to take assignment of its lease pursuant to Section 4.6(b); provided that, the Assuming Institution shall give the Receiver notice of its election to purchase such Furniture and Equipment at the time it gives notice of its intention to surrender such Bank Premises.

(i) Option to Put Bank Premises and Related Fixtures, Furniture and Equipment .

(i) For a period of ninety (90) days following the Bank Closing Date, the Assuming Institution shall be entitled to require the Receiver to purchase any Bank Premises that is owned, directly or indirectly, by an Acquired Subsidiary and the purchase price paid by the Receiver shall be the Fair Market Value of the Bank Premises.

(ii) If the Assuming Institution elects to require the Receiver to purchase any Bank Premises that is owned, directly or indirectly, by an Acquired Subsidiary, the Assuming Institution shall also have the option, exercisable within the same ninety (90) day time period, to require the Receiver to purchase any Fixtures, any Furniture and Equipment and any Specialty Assets that are owned, directly or indirectly, by an Acquired Subsidiary and are located on or at such Bank Premises and were utilized by the Failed Bank for banking purposes. The purchase price paid by the Receiver shall be the Fair Market Value of the Fixtures, Furniture and Equipment and Specialty Assets purchased.

(iii) If the Assuming Institution elects to exercise its options under this Section 4.6(i), the Assuming Institution shall pay to the Receiver occupancy costs as described in Section 4.6(e) and shall surrender the Bank Premises in accordance with Section 4.6(g)(i).

(iv) Regardless of whether the Assuming Institution exercises any of its options under this Section 4.6(i), the purchase price for the Acquired Subsidiary shall be adjusted by the difference between the Fair Market Value of the Bank Premises, the Fixtures, the Furniture and Equipment and the Specialty Assets utilized by the Failed Bank for banking purposes and their respective Book Value as reflected on the books and records of the Acquired Subsidiary. Such adjustment shall be made in accordance with Article VIII of this Agreement.

(j) Option to Purchase Specialty Assets . The Receiver hereby grants to the Assuming Institution an exclusive option for the period of thirty (30) days commencing the day after the Receiver provides the Assuming Institution the appropriate appraisal to purchase at Fair Market Value all, some or none of the Specialty Assets.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 27 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(k) Data Removal . The Assuming Institution shall, prior to returning any automated teller machine to Receiver and unless otherwise requested by the Receiver, (i) remove all data from that automated teller machine and (ii) provide a written statement to the Receiver that all data has been removed in a manner that renders it unrecoverable.

4.7. Agreement with Respect to Leased Data Management Equipment .

(a) Option . The Receiver hereby grants to the Assuming Institution an exclusive option for the period of ninety (90) days commencing the day after Bank Closing Date to accept an assignment from the Receiver of all Leased Data Management Equipment.

(b) Notices Regarding Leased Data Management Equipment . The Assuming Institution shall (i) give written notice to the Receiver within the option period specified in Section 4.7(a) of its intent to accept or decline an assignment or sublease of all Leased Data Management Equipment and promptly accept an assignment or sublease of such Leased Data Management Equipment, and (ii) give written notice to the appropriate lessor(s) that it has accepted an assignment or sublease of any such Leased Data Management Equipment that is subject to a lease.

(c) Facilitation by Receiver . The Receiver agrees to facilitate the assignment or sublease of Leased Data Management Equipment or the negotiation of new leases or license agreements by the Assuming Institution; provided, that neither the Receiver nor the Corporation shall be obligated to engage in litigation, make payments to the Assuming Institution or to any third party in connection with facilitating any such assumption, assignment, sublease or negotiation or commit to any other obligations to third parties.

(d) Operating Costs . The Assuming Institution agrees, during its period of use of any Leased Data Management Equipment and ending on the date which is thirty (30) days after the Assuming Institution has given notice to the Receiver of its election not to assume such lease, to pay to the Receiver or to appropriate third parties at the direction of the Receiver all operating costs with respect thereto and to comply with all relevant terms of any existing Leased Data Management Equipment leases entered into by the Failed Bank, including without limitation the timely payment of all rent, taxes, fees, charges, maintenance, utilities, insurance and assessments.

(e) Assuming Institution’s Obligation . The Assuming Institution shall, not later than fifty (50) days after giving the notice provided in Section 4.7(b), (i) relinquish and release to the Receiver or, at the direction of the Receiver, to a third party, all Leased Data Management Equipment, in the same condition as at Bank Closing Date, normal wear and tear excepted, or (ii) accept an assignment or a sublease of any existing Leased Data Management lease or negotiate a new lease or license agreement under this Section 4.7 with respect to Leased Data Management Equipment.

(f) Data Removal . The Assuming Institution shall, prior to returning any Leased Data Management Equipment, and unless otherwise requested by the Receiver, (i) remove all data from the Leased Data Management Equipment and (ii) provide a written statement to the Receiver that all data has been removed in a manner that renders it unrecoverable.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 28 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


4.8. Certain Existing Agreements .

(a) Assumption of Agreements . Subject to the provisions of Section 4.8(b), with respect to agreements existing as of the Bank Closing Date which provide for the rendering of services by or to the Failed Bank, within ninety (90) days after the Bank Closing Date, the Assuming Institution shall give the Receiver written notice specifying whether it elects to assume or not to assume each such agreement. Except as may be otherwise provided in this Article IV, the Assuming Institution agrees to comply with the terms of each such agreement for a period commencing on the day after the Bank Closing Date and ending on: (i) in the case of an agreement that provides for the rendering of services by the Failed Bank, the date which is ninety (90) days after the Bank Closing Date, and (ii) in the case of an agreement that provides for the rendering of services to the Failed Bank, the date which is thirty (30) days after the Assuming Institution has given notice to the Receiver of its election not to assume such agreement; provided that the Receiver can reasonably make such service agreements available to the Assuming Institution. The Assuming Institution shall be deemed by the Receiver to have assumed agreements for which no notification is timely given. The Receiver agrees to assign, transfer, convey and deliver to the Assuming Institution all right, title and interest of the Receiver, if any, in and to agreements the Assuming Institution assumes hereunder. In the event the Assuming Institution elects not to accept an assignment of any lease (or sublease) or negotiate a new lease for leased Bank Premises under Section 4.6 and does not otherwise occupy such premises, the provisions of this Section 4.8(a) shall not apply to service agreements related to such premises. The Assuming Institution agrees, during the period it has the use or benefit of any such agreement, promptly to pay to the Receiver or to appropriate third parties at the direction of the Receiver all operating costs with respect thereto and to comply with all relevant terms of such agreement.

(b) Excluded Agreements . The provisions of Section 4.8(a) regarding the Assuming Institution’s election to assume or not assume certain agreements shall not apply to (i) agreements pursuant to which the Failed Bank provides loan servicing for others or loan servicing is provided to the Failed Bank by others, (ii) agreements maintained between the Failed Bank and MERSCORP, Inc., or its wholly owned subsidiary, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., (iii) agreements that are subject to Sections 4.1 through 4.7 and any insurance policy or bond referred to in Section 3.5(a) or other agreement specified in Section 3.5, (iv) consulting, management or employment agreements, if any, between the Failed Bank and its employees or other Persons, and (v) any contract or agreement under which the Failed Bank is the lessor of Bank Premises or Other Real Estate. Except as otherwise expressly set forth elsewhere in this Agreement, the Assuming Institution does not assume any liabilities or acquire any rights under any of the agreements described in this Section 4.8(b).

4.9. Informational Tax Reporting . The Assuming Institution agrees to perform all obligations of the Failed Bank with respect to Federal and State income tax informational reporting related to (i) the Acquired Assets and the Liabilities Assumed, (ii) deposit accounts that were closed and loans that were paid off or collateral obtained with respect thereto prior to the Bank Closing Date, (iii) miscellaneous payments made to vendors of the Failed Bank, and (iv) any other asset or liability of the Failed Bank, including, without limitation, loans not purchased and Deposits not assumed by the Assuming Institution, as may be required by the Receiver.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 29 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


4.10. Insurance .

(a) Assuming Institution to Insure . The Assuming Institution will obtain and maintain insurance coverage acceptable to the Receiver (including public liability, fire, and extended coverage insurance) naming the Assuming Institution as the insured and the Receiver as additional insured, effective from and after the Bank Closing Date, with respect to all (i) Bank Premises, and (ii) Fixtures, Furniture and Equipment, Specialty Assets and Leased Data Management Equipment located on or at those Bank Premises. The Assuming Institution’s obligation to insure and to maintain the Receiver as an additional insured on Bank Premises insurance coverage shall cease upon either: (x) Bank Premises Surrender Date or (y) the date the Assuming Institution receives a deed from the Receiver for owned Bank Premises or assumes the lease for leased Bank Premises.

(b) Rights of Receiver . If the Assuming Institution at any time from or after Bank Closing Date fails to (i) obtain or maintain any of the insurance policies required by Section 4.10(a), (ii) pay any premium in whole or in part related to those insurance policies, or (iii) provide evidence of those insurance policies acceptable to the Receiver, then the Receiver may in its sole and absolute discretion, without notice, and without waiving or releasing any obligation or liability of the Assuming Institution, obtain and maintain insurance policies, pay insurance premiums and take any other actions with respect to the insurance coverage as the Receiver deem advisable. The Assuming Institution will reimburse the Receiver for all sums disbursed in connection with this Section 4.10(b).

4.11. Office Space for Receiver and Corporation; Certain Payments .

(a) FDIC Office Space . For the period commencing on the day following the Bank Closing Date and ending on the one hundred fiftieth (150th) day following the Bank Closing Date, the Assuming Institution will provide to the Receiver and the Corporation, without charge, adequate and suitable office space (including parking facilities and vault space), furniture, equipment (including photocopying and telecopying machines), email accounts, network access and technology resources (such as shared drive), and utilities (including local telephone service and fax machines) (collectively, “ FDIC Office Space ”) at the Bank Premises occupied by the Assuming Institution for the Receiver and the Corporation to use in the discharge of their respective functions with respect to the Failed Bank.

(b) Receiver’s Right to Extend . Upon written notice by the Receiver or the Corporation, for the period commencing on the one hundred fifty-first (151st) day following the Bank Closing Date and ending no later than the three hundred and sixty-fifth (365th) day following the Bank Closing Date, the Assuming Institution will continue to provide to the Receiver and the Corporation FDIC Office Space at the Bank Premises. During the period from the 151st day following the Bank Closing Date until the day the FDIC and the Corporation vacate FDIC Office Space, the Receiver and the Corporation will pay to the Assuming Institution their respective pro rata share (based on square footage occupied) of (A) the market rental value for the applicable owned Bank Premises or (B) actual rent paid for applicable leased Bank Premises.

(c) Receiver’s Relocation Right . If the Receiver or the Corporation determine that the space provided by the Assuming Institution is inadequate or unsuitable, the Receiver and

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 30 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


the Corporation may relocate to other quarters having adequate and suitable FDIC Office Space and the costs of relocation shall be borne by the Assuming Institution and any rental and utility costs for the balance of the period of occupancy by the Receiver and the Corporation shall paid in accordance with 4.11(b).

(d) Expenditures . The Assuming Institution will pay such bills and invoices on behalf of the Receiver and the Corporation as the Receiver or the Corporation may direct for the period beginning on the date of the Bank Closing Date and ending on Settlement Date. The Assuming Institution shall submit its requests for reimbursement of such expenditures pursuant to Article VIII of this Agreement.

4.12. Continuation of Group Health Plan Coverage for Former Employees of the Failed Bank .

(a) Continuation Coverage . The Assuming Institution agrees to assist the Receiver, as provided in this Section 4.12, in offering individuals who were employees or former employees of the Failed Bank, or any of its Subsidiaries, and who, immediately prior to the Bank Closing Date, were receiving, or were eligible to receive, health insurance coverage or health insurance continuation coverage from the Failed Bank (“ Eligible Individuals ”), the opportunity to obtain health insurance coverage in the Corporation’s Federal Insurance Administration Continuation Coverage Plan which provides for health insurance continuation coverage to such Eligible Individuals and other persons who are qualified beneficiaries of the Failed Bank (“ Qualified Beneficiaries ”) as defined in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ ERISA ”) § 607, 29 U.S.C. § 1167. The Assuming Institution shall consult with the Receiver and not later than five (5) Business Days after the Bank Closing Date shall provide written notice to the Receiver of the number (if available), identity (if available) and addresses (if available) of the Eligible Individuals who are Qualified Beneficiaries of the Failed Bank and for whom a “qualifying event” (as defined in ERISA § 603, 29 U.S.C. § 1163) has occurred and with respect to whom the Failed Bank’s obligations under Part 6 of Subtitle B of Title I of ERISA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1161-1169 have not been satisfied in full, and such other information as the Receiver may reasonably require. The Receiver shall cooperate with the Assuming Institution in order to permit it to prepare such notice and shall provide to the Assuming Institution such data in its possession as may be reasonably required for purposes of preparing such notice.

(b) Qualified Beneficiaries; Expenses . The Assuming Institution shall take such further action to assist the Receiver in offering the Eligible Individuals who are Qualified Beneficiaries of the Failed Bank the opportunity to obtain health insurance coverage in the Corporation’s Federal Insurance Administration Continuation Coverage Plan as the Receiver may direct. All expenses incurred and paid by the Assuming Institution (i) in connection with the obligations of the Assuming Institution under this Section 4.12, and (ii) in providing health insurance continuation coverage to any Eligible Individuals who are hired by the Assuming Institution and such employees’ Qualified Beneficiaries shall be borne by the Assuming Institution.

(c) Failed Bank Employees . Unless otherwise agreed by the Receiver and the Assuming Institution, the Assuming Institution shall be responsible for all salaries and payroll costs, including benefits, for all Failed Bank employees from the time of the closing of the Failed

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 31 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Bank until the Assuming Institution makes a final determination as to whether such employee is to be retained by the Assuming Institution. The Assuming Institution shall offer to the Failed Bank employees it retains employment benefits comparable to those the Assuming Institution, offers its current employees. In the event the Receiver utilizes the services of any Failed Bank employee, the Receiver shall reimburse the Assuming Institution for such cost through the settlement process described in Article VIII.

(d) No Third Party Beneficiaries . This Section 4.12 is for the sole and exclusive benefit of the parties to this Agreement, and for the benefit of no other Person (including any former employee of the Failed Bank or any Subsidiary thereof, Eligible Individual or Qualified Beneficiary of such former employee). Nothing in this Section 4.12 is intended by the parties, or shall be construed, to give any Person (including any former employee of the Failed Bank or any Subsidiary thereof, Eligible Individual or Qualified Beneficiary of such former employee) other than the Corporation, the Receiver and the Assuming Institution, any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or with respect to the provisions of this Section 4.12.

4.13. Interim Asset Servicing . At any time after the Bank Closing Date, the Receiver may establish on its books an asset pool(s) and may transfer to such asset pool(s) (by means of accounting entries on the books of the Receiver) all or any assets and liabilities of the Failed Bank which are not acquired by the Assuming Institution, including, without limitation, wholly unfunded Commitments and assets and liabilities which may be acquired, funded or originated by the Receiver subsequent to the Bank Closing Date. The Receiver may remove assets (and liabilities) from or add assets (and liabilities) to such pool(s) at any time in its discretion. At the option of the Receiver, the Assuming Institution agrees to service, administer and collect such pool assets in accordance with, and for the term set forth in, Exhibit 4.13 .

ARTICLE V. DUTIES WITH RESPECT TO DEPOSITORS OF THE FAILED BANK .

5.1. Payment of Checks, Drafts, Orders and Deposits . Subject to Section 9.5, the Assuming Institution agrees to pay all properly drawn checks, drafts, withdrawal orders and Assumed Deposits of depositors of the Failed Bank presented for payment, whether drawn on the check or draft forms provided by the Failed Bank or by the Assuming Institution, to the extent that the Deposit balances to the credit of the respective makers or drawers assumed by the Assuming Institution under this Agreement are sufficient to permit the payment thereof, and in all other respects to discharge, in the usual course of conducting a banking business, the duties and obligations of the Failed Bank with respect to the Deposit balances due and owing to the depositors of the Failed Bank assumed by the Assuming Institution under this Agreement.

5.2. Certain Agreements Related to Deposits . Except as may be modified pursuant to Section 2.2, the Assuming Institution agrees to honor the terms and conditions of any written escrow or loan servicing agreement or other similar agreement relating to a Deposit liability assumed by the Assuming Institution pursuant to this Agreement.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 32 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


5.3. Notice to Depositors .

(a) Assumption of Deposits . Within thirty (30) days after the Bank Closing Date, the Assuming Institution shall give notice by mail to each depositor of the Failed Bank of (i) the assumption of the Deposit liabilities of the Failed Bank, and (ii) the procedures to claim Deposits (the Receiver shall provide item (ii) to Assuming Institution). The Assuming Institution shall also publish notice of its assumption of the Deposit liabilities of the Failed Bank in a newspaper of general circulation in the county or counties in which the Failed Bank was located.

(b) Notice to Depositors . Within thirty (30) days after the Bank Closing Date, the Assuming Institution shall give notices by mail to each depositor of the Failed Bank, as required under Section 2.2.

(c) Fee Schedule . If the Assuming Institution proposes to charge fees different from those fees formerly charged by the Failed Bank, the Assuming Institution shall include its fee schedule in its mailed notice.

(d) Approval of Notices and Publications . The Assuming Institution shall obtain approval of all notices and publications required by this Section 5.3 from counsel for the Receiver prior to mailing or publication.

(e) Validation. To validate the notice requirements outlined in Section 5.3, the Assuming Institution shall provide the Receiver (i) an Affidavit of Publication to meet the publication requirements outlined in Section 5.3(a) and (ii) the Assuming Institution will prepare an Affidavit of Mailing in a form substantially similar to Exhibit 2.3B after mailing the seven (7) day Notice to Depositors as required under Section 5.3(b).

ARTICLE VI. FAILED BANK RECORDS .

6.1. Transfer of Failed Bank Records . In accordance with Sections 2.1 and 3.1, the Receiver assigns, transfers, conveys and delivers to the Assuming Institution, wherever located, any and all Failed Bank Records, other than the following:

(a) Failed Bank Records pertaining to former employees of the Failed Bank who were no longer employed by the Failed Bank as of the Bank Closing Date and Failed Bank Records pertaining to employees of the Failed Bank who were employed by the Failed Bank as of the Bank Closing Date and for whom the Receiver is unable to obtain a waiver to release such Failed Bank Records to the Assuming Institution;

(b) Failed Bank Records pertaining to (i) any asset or liability of the Failed Bank retained by the Receiver, and (ii) any asset of the Failed Bank acquired by the Receiver pursuant to this Agreement; and

(c) any other Failed Bank Records as determined by the Receiver.

6.2. Reserved .

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 33 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


6.3. Preservation of Failed Bank Records .

(a) Assuming Institution Failed Bank Records Retention . The Assuming Institution will preserve and maintain, at its sole expense, for the joint benefit of the Receiver, the Corporation and the Assuming Institution, all Failed Bank Records, regardless of whether the Failed Bank Records were transferred to the Assuming Institution under Section 6.1 or retained by the Receiver under Sections 6.1(a) through (c), except those Failed Bank Records which the Receiver, in its sole and absolute discretion, chooses to physically take. The Assuming Institution shall have the primary responsibility to respond to subpoenas, discovery requests, and other similar official inquiries and customer requests for lien releases with respect to the Failed Bank Records of which it has custody. If the Assuming Institution receives a subpoena addressed to the Assuming Institution seeking any Failed Bank Records of which it has custody, but are Failed Bank Records retained by the Receiver, the Assuming Institution will promptly provide the Receiver with a copy of that subpoena by delivering a copy to the Regional Counsel, as provided in Section 13.6(b). With respect to its obligations under this Section 6.3 regarding Electronically Stored Information, the Assuming Institution will complete the Data Retention Catalog attached hereto as Schedule 6.3 and submit it to the Receiver within thirty (30) days after the Bank Closing Date. With respect to Electronically Stored Information, the Assuming Institution must maintain those Failed Bank Records in an easily accessible and useable format. If such Failed Bank Records are maintained by a third party vendor, the Assuming Institution is responsible for ensuring that the third party complies with this Article.

(b) Destruction of Certain Failed Bank Records . With regard to all Failed Bank Records of which the Assuming Institution has custody which are at least ten (10) years old as of the date of the appointment of the Receiver, the Assuming Institution will request written permission to destroy such Failed Bank Records by submitting a written request to destroy, specifying precisely which Failed Bank Records are included in the request, to DRR– Records Manager, CServiceFDICDAL@FDIC.gov.

(c) Destruction of Failed Bank Records after Six Years . With regard to all Failed Bank Records of which the Assuming Institution has custody which have been maintained in its custody after six (6) years from the date of the appointment of the Receiver, the Assuming Institution will request written permission to destroy such Failed Bank Records by submitting a written request to destroy, specifying precisely which Failed Bank Records are included in the request, to DRR– Records Manager, CServiceFDICDAL@FDIC.gov.

6.4. Access to Failed Bank Records; Copies . The Assuming Institution will permit the Receiver and the Corporation access to all Failed Bank Records of which the Assuming Institution has custody, and to use, inspect, make extracts from or request copies of any such Failed Bank Records in the manner and to the extent requested, and to duplicate, in the discretion of the Receiver or the Corporation, any Failed Bank Record; provided that if the Failed Bank maintained one or more duplicate copies of such Failed Bank Records, the Assuming Institution hereby assigns, transfers, and conveys to the Corporation one such duplicate copy of each such Failed Bank Record without cost to the Corporation, and will deliver to the Corporation all Failed Bank Records assigned and transferred to the Corporation under this Article VI as soon as practicable on or after the date of this Agreement. The party requesting a copy of any Failed Bank Record shall bear the cost (based on standard accepted industry charges to the extent applicable, as determined by the

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 34 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Receiver) for providing such duplicate Failed Bank Record. A copy of each Failed Bank Record requested shall be provided upon the request of the Receiver. If the Receiver or Corporation is seeking access to a Failed Bank Record from the Assuming Institution, the Receiver or Corporation need not provide a subpoena to obtain access to the Failed Bank Records in the Assuming Institution’s custody.

ARTICLE VII. BID; INITIAL PAYMENT .

The Assuming Institution has submitted to the Receiver a Deposit premium bid of 1.59% (the “ Bid Amount ”). The Deposit premium bid will be applied to the total of all Assumed Deposits except for brokered, CDARS ® , and any market place or similar subscription services Deposits as reflected on Schedule 7 . On the Payment Date, the Assuming Institution will pay to the Corporation, or the Corporation will pay to the Assuming Institution, as the case may be, the Initial Payment, together with interest on such amount (if the Payment Date is not the day following the Bank Closing Date) from and including the day following the Bank Closing Date to and including the day preceding the Payment Date at the Settlement Interest Rate.

ARTICLE VIII. ADJUSTMENTS; SETTLEMENT PROCESS .

8.1. Pro Forma Statement . The Receiver, as soon as practicable after the Bank Closing Date, in accordance with the best information then available, shall provide to the Assuming Institution a Pro Forma statement reflecting any adjustments of such liabilities and assets as may be necessary. Such Pro Forma statement shall take into account, to the extent possible, (a) liabilities and assets of a nature similar to those contemplated by Section 2.1 or Section 3.1, respectively, which on the Bank Closing Date were carried in the Failed Bank’s suspense accounts, (b) accruals as of the Bank Closing Date for all income related to the assets and business of the Failed Bank acquired by the Assuming Institution hereunder, whether or not such accruals were reflected on the Failed Bank Records in the normal course of its operations, and (c) adjustments to determine the Book Value of any investment in an Acquired Subsidiary and related accounts on the “bank only” (unconsolidated) balance sheet of the Failed Bank based on the Equity Method of Accounting, whether or not the Failed Bank used the Equity Method of Accounting for investments in subsidiaries, except that the resulting amount cannot be less than the Acquired Subsidiary’s recorded equity as of the Bank Closing Date as reflected on the Failed Bank Records of the Acquired Subsidiary. Acquired Subsidiaries with negative equity will be restated to $1 pursuant to the Equity Method of Accounting. Any Acquired Asset purchased by the Assuming Institution or any asset of an Acquired Subsidiary purchased by the Assuming Institution pursuant to Section 3.1 which was partially or wholly charged off during the period beginning the day after the Bid Valuation Date to the date of the Bank Closing Date shall be deemed not to be charged off for the purposes of the Pro Forma statement, and the purchase price shall be determined pursuant to Section 3.2.

8.2. Correction of Errors and Omissions; Other Liabilities .

(a) Adjustments to Correct Errors . In the event any bookkeeping omissions or errors are discovered in preparing any Pro Forma statement or in completing the transfers and assumptions contemplated hereby, the parties hereto agree to correct such errors and omissions, it being understood that, as far as practicable, all adjustments will be made consistent with the

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 35 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


judgments, methods, policies or accounting principles utilized by the Failed Bank in preparing and maintaining Failed Bank Records, except that adjustments made pursuant to this Section 8.2(a) are not intended to bring the Failed Bank Records into accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

(b) Receiver’s Rights Regarding Other Liabilities . If the Receiver discovers at any time subsequent to the date of this Agreement that any claim exists against the Failed Bank which is of such a nature that it would have been included in the liabilities assumed under Article II had the existence of such claim or the facts giving rise thereto been known as of the Bank Closing Date, the Receiver may, in its discretion, at any time, require that such claim be assumed by the Assuming Institution in a manner consistent with the intent of this Agreement. The Receiver will make appropriate adjustments to the Pro Forma statement provided by the Receiver to the Assuming Institution pursuant to Section 8.1 as may be necessary.

8.3. Payments . The Receiver agrees to cause to be paid to the Assuming Institution, or the Assuming Institution agrees to pay to the Receiver, as the case may be, on the Settlement Date, a payment in an amount which reflects net adjustments (including any costs, expenses and fees associated with determinations of value as provided in this Agreement) made pursuant to Section 8.1 or Section 8.2, plus interest as provided in Section 8.4. The Receiver and the Assuming Institution agree to effect on the Settlement Date any further transfer of assets to or assumption of liabilities or claims by the Assuming Institution as may be necessary in accordance with Section 8.1 or Section 8.2.

8.4. Interest . Any amounts paid under Section 8.3 or Section 8.5 shall bear interest for the period from and including the day following the Bank Closing Date to and including the day preceding the payment at the Settlement Interest Rate.

8.5. Subsequent Adjustments . In the event that the Assuming Institution or the Receiver discovers any errors or omissions as contemplated by Section 8.2 or any error with respect to the payment made under Section 8.3 after the Settlement Date, the Assuming Institution and the Receiver agree to promptly correct any such errors or omissions, make any payments and effect any transfers or assumptions as may be necessary to reflect any such correction plus interest as provided in Section 8.4.

ARTICLE IX. CONTINUING COOPERATION .

9.1. General Matters . The parties hereto will, in good faith and with their best efforts, cooperate with each other to carry out the transactions contemplated by this Agreement and to effect the purposes hereof.

9.2. Additional Title Documents . The Receiver, the Corporation and the Assuming Institution each shall, at any time, and from time to time, upon the request of any party hereto, execute and deliver such additional instruments and documents of conveyance as shall be reasonably necessary to vest in the appropriate party its full legal or equitable title in and to the property transferred pursuant to this Agreement or to be transferred in accordance herewith. The Assuming Institution shall prepare such instruments and documents of conveyance (in form and substance satisfactory to the Receiver) as shall be necessary to vest title to the Acquired Assets in the Assuming Institution. The Assuming Institution shall be responsible for recording such instruments and documents of conveyance at its own expense.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 36 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


9.3. Claims and Suits .

(a) Defense and Settlement . The Receiver shall have the right, in its discretion, to (i) defend or settle any claim or suit against the Assuming Institution with respect to which the Receiver has indemnified the Assuming Institution in the same manner and to the same extent as provided in Article XII, and (ii) defend or settle any claim or suit against the Assuming Institution with respect to any Liability Assumed, which claim or suit may result in a loss to the Receiver arising out of or related to this Agreement, or which existed against the Failed Bank on or before the Bank Closing Date. The exercise by the Receiver of any rights under this Section 9.3(a) shall not release the Assuming Institution with respect to any of its obligations under this Agreement.

(b) Removal of Actions . In the event any action at law or in equity shall be instituted by any Person against the Receiver and the Corporation as codefendants with respect to any asset of the Failed Bank retained or acquired pursuant to this Agreement by the Receiver, the Receiver agrees, at the request of the Corporation, to join with the Corporation in a petition to remove the action to the United States District Court for the proper district. The Receiver agrees to institute, with or without joinder of the Corporation as co-plaintiff, any action with respect to any such retained or acquired asset or any matter connected therewith whenever notice requiring such action shall be given by the Corporation to the Receiver.

9.4. Payment of Deposits . In the event any depositor does not accept the obligation of the Assuming Institution to pay any Deposit liability of the Failed Bank assumed by the Assuming Institution pursuant to this Agreement and asserts a claim against the Receiver for all or any portion of any such Deposit liability, the Assuming Institution agrees on demand to provide to the Receiver funds sufficient to pay such claim in an amount not in excess of the Deposit liability reflected on the books of the Assuming Institution at the time such claim is made. Upon payment by the Assuming Institution to the Receiver of such amount, the Assuming Institution shall be discharged from any further obligation under this Agreement to pay to any such depositor the amount of such Deposit liability paid to the Receiver.

9.5. Withheld Payments . At any time, the Receiver or the Corporation may, in its discretion, determine that all or any portion of any deposit balance assumed by the Assuming Institution pursuant to this Agreement does not constitute a “Deposit” (or otherwise, in its discretion, determine that it is the best interest of the Receiver or Corporation to withhold all or any portion of any deposit), and may direct the Assuming Institution to withhold payment of all or any portion of any such deposit balance. Upon such direction, the Assuming Institution agrees to hold such deposit and not to make any payment of such deposit balance to or on behalf of the depositor, or to itself, whether by way of transfer, set-off or otherwise. The Assuming Institution agrees to maintain the “withheld payment” status of any such deposit balance until directed in writing by the Receiver or the Corporation as to its disposition. At the direction of the Receiver or the Corporation, the Assuming Institution shall return all or any portion of such deposit balance to the Receiver or the Corporation, as appropriate, and thereupon the Assuming Institution shall be discharged from any further

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 37 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


liability to such depositor with respect to such returned deposit balance. If such deposit balance has been paid to the depositor prior to a demand for return by the Corporation or the Receiver, and payment of such deposit balance had not been previously withheld pursuant to this Section 9.5, the Assuming Institution shall not be obligated to return such deposit balance to the Receiver or the Corporation. The Assuming Institution shall be obligated to reimburse the Corporation or the Receiver, as the case may be, for the amount of any deposit balance or portion thereof paid by the Assuming Institution in contravention of any previous direction to withhold payment of such deposit balance or return such deposit balance the payment of which was withheld pursuant to this Section 9.5.

9.6. Proceedings with Respect to Certain Assets and Liabilities .

(a) Cooperation by Assuming Institution . In connection with any investigation, proceeding or other matter with respect to any asset or liability of the Failed Bank retained by the Receiver, or any asset of the Failed Bank acquired by the Receiver pursuant to this Agreement, the Assuming Institution shall cooperate to the extent reasonably required by the Receiver.

(b) Access to Records . In addition to its obligations under Section 6.4, the Assuming Institution shall provide representatives of the Receiver access at reasonable times and locations without other limitation or qualification to (i) its directors, officers, employees and agents and those of the Acquired Subsidiaries, and (ii) its books and records, the books and records of such Acquired Subsidiaries and all Credit Files, and copies thereof. Copies of books, records, and Credit Files shall be provided by the Assuming Institution as requested by the Receiver and the costs of duplication thereof shall be borne by the Receiver.

(c) Loan Documents . Not later than ten (10) days after the Put Notice pursuant to Section 3.4 or the date of the notice of transfer of any Loan by the Assuming Institution to the Receiver pursuant to Section 3.6, the Assuming Institution shall deliver to the Receiver such documents with respect to such Loan as the Receiver may request, including without limitation the following: (i) all related Credit Documents (other than certificates, notices and other ancillary documents), (ii) a certificate setting forth the principal amount on the date of the transfer and the amount of interest, fees and other charges then accrued and unpaid thereon, and any restrictions on transfer to which any such Loan is subject, and (iii) all Credit Files, and all documents, microfiche, microfilm and computer records (including but not limited to magnetic tape, disc storage, card forms and printed copy) maintained by, owned by, or in the possession of the Assuming Institution or any Affiliate of the Assuming Institution relating to the transferred Loan.

9.7. Information . The Assuming Institution promptly shall provide to the Corporation such other information, including financial statements and computations, relating to the performance of the provisions of this Agreement as the Corporation or the Receiver may request from time to time, and, at the request of the Receiver, make available employees of the Failed Bank employed or retained by the Assuming Institution to assist in preparation of the Pro Forma statement pursuant to Section 8.1.

9.8. Tax Ruling . The Assuming Institution shall not at any time, without the Corporation’s prior consent, seek a private letter ruling or other determination from the

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 38 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Internal Revenue Service or otherwise seek to qualify for any special tax treatment or benefits associated with any payments made by the Receiver or Corporation pursuant to this Agreement.

ARTICLE X. CONDITION PRECEDENT .

The obligations of the parties to this Agreement are subject to the Receiver and the Corporation having received at or before the Bank Closing Date evidence reasonably satisfactory to each of any necessary approval, waiver, or other action by any governmental authority, the board of directors of the Assuming Institution, or other third party, with respect to this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, the closing of the Failed Bank and the appointment of the Receiver, the chartering of the Assuming Institution, and any agreements, documents, matters or proceedings contemplated hereby or thereby.

ARTICLE XI. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES OF THE ASSUMING INSTITUTION .

The Assuming Institution represents and warrants to the Corporation and the Receiver as follows:

11.1. Corporate Existence and Authority . The Assuming Institution (a) is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its Chartering Authority and has full power and authority to own and operate its properties and to conduct its business as now conducted by it, and (b) has full power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement and to perform its obligations hereunder. The Assuming Institution has taken all necessary corporate (or other applicable governance) action to authorize the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement and the performance of the transactions contemplated hereby.

11.2. Third Party Consents . No governmental authority or other third party consents (including but not limited to approvals, licenses, registrations or declarations) are required in connection with the execution, delivery or performance by the Assuming Institution of this Agreement, other than such consents as have been duly obtained and are in full force and effect.

11.3. Execution and Enforceability . This Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the Assuming Institution and when this Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Corporation and the Receiver, this Agreement will constitute the legal, valid and binding obligation of the Assuming Institution, enforceable in accordance with its terms.

11.4. Compliance with Law .

(a) No Violations . Neither the Assuming Institution nor any of its Subsidiaries is in violation of any statute, regulation, order, decision, judgment or decree of, or any restriction imposed by, the United States of America, any State, municipality or other political subdivision or any agency of any of the foregoing, or any court or other tribunal having jurisdiction over the Assuming Institution or any of its Subsidiaries or any assets of any such Person, or any foreign government or agency thereof having such jurisdiction, with respect to the

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 39 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


conduct of the business of the Assuming Institution or of any of its Subsidiaries, or the ownership of the properties of the Assuming Institution or any of its Subsidiaries, which, either individually or in the aggregate with all other such violations, would materially and adversely affect the business, operations or condition (financial or otherwise) of the Assuming Institution or the ability of the Assuming Institution to perform, satisfy or observe any obligation or condition under this Agreement.

(b) No Conflict . Neither the execution and delivery nor the performance by the Assuming Institution of this Agreement will result in any violation by the Assuming Institution of, or be in conflict with, any provision of any applicable law or regulation, or any order, writ or decree of any court or governmental authority.

11.5. Insured or Guaranteed Loans . If any Loans being transferred pursuant to this Agreement are insured or guaranteed by any department or agency of any governmental unit, federal, state or local, Assuming Institution represents that Assuming Institution has been approved by such agency and is an approved lender or mortgagee, as appropriate, if such approval is required. The Assuming Institution further assumes full responsibility for determining whether or not such insurance or guarantees are in full force and effect on the date of this Agreement and with respect to those Loans whose insurance or guaranty is in full force and effect on the date of this Agreement, Assuming Institution assumes full responsibility for doing all things necessary to insure such insurance or guarantees remain in full force and effect. Assuming Institution agrees to assume all of the obligations under the contract(s) of insurance or guaranty and agrees to cooperate with the Receiver where necessary to complete forms required by the insuring or guaranteeing department or agency to effect or complete the transfer to Assuming Institution.

11.6. Representations Remain True . The Assuming Institution represents and warrants that it has executed and delivered to the Corporation a Purchaser Eligibility Certification and Confidentiality Agreement and that all information provided and representations made by or on behalf of the Assuming Institution in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, including, but not limited to, the Purchaser Eligibility Certification and Confidentiality Agreement (which are affirmed and ratified hereby) are and remain true and correct in all material respects and do not fail to state any fact required to make the information contained therein not misleading.

11.7. No Reliance; Independent Advice . The Assuming Institution is not relying on the Receiver or the Corporation for any business, legal, tax, accounting, investment or other advice in connection with this Agreement and the Exhibits hereto and documents delivered in connection with the foregoing, and has had adequate opportunity to consult with advisors of its choice in connection therewith.

ARTICLE XII. INDEMNIFICATION .

12.1. Indemnification of Indemnitees . From and after the Bank Closing Date and subject to the limitations set forth in this Section 12.1 and Section 12.6 and compliance by the Indemnitee with Section 12.2, the Receiver agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Indemnitee against any and all costs, losses, liabilities, expenses (including attorneys’ fees) incurred prior to the assumption of defense by the Receiver pursuant to Section 12.2(d),

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 40 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with claims against an Indemnitee based on liabilities of the Failed Bank that are not assumed by the Assuming Institution pursuant to this Agreement or subsequent to the execution hereof by the Assuming Institution or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Assuming Institution for which indemnification is provided:

(a) hereunder in this Section 12.1, subject to certain exclusions as provided in Section 12.1(b):

(i) claims based on the rights of any shareholder or former shareholder as such of (A) the Failed Bank, or (B) any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Failed Bank;

(ii) claims based on the rights of any creditor as such of the Failed Bank, or any creditor as such of any director, officer, employee or agent of the Failed Bank, with respect to any indebtedness or other obligation of the Failed Bank arising prior to the Bank Closing Date;

(iii) claims based on the rights of any present or former director, officer, employee or agent as such of the Failed Bank or of any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Failed Bank;

(iv) claims based on any action or inaction prior to the Bank Closing Date of the Failed Bank, its directors, officers, employees or agents as such, or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Failed Bank, or the directors, officers, employees or agents as such of such Subsidiary or Affiliate;

(v) claims based on any malfeasance, misfeasance or nonfeasance of the Failed Bank, its directors, officers, employees or agents with respect to the trust business of the Failed Bank, if any;

(vi) claims based on any failure or alleged failure (not in violation of law) by the Assuming Institution to continue to perform any service or activity previously performed by the Failed Bank which the Assuming Institution is not required to perform pursuant to this Agreement or which arise under any contract to which the Failed Bank was a party which the Assuming Institution elected not to assume in accordance with this Agreement and which neither the Assuming Institution nor any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Assuming Institution has assumed subsequent to the execution hereof;

(vii) claims arising from any action or inaction of any Indemnitee, including for purposes of this Section 12.1(a)(vii) the former officers or employees of the Failed Bank or of any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Failed Bank that is taken upon the specific written direction of the Corporation or the Receiver, other than any action or inaction taken in a manner constituting bad faith, gross negligence or willful misconduct; and

(viii) claims based on the rights of any depositor of the Failed Bank whose deposit has been accorded “withheld payment” status and/or returned to the Receiver or Corporation in accordance with Section 9.5 and/or has become an “unclaimed deposit” or has been returned to the Corporation or the Receiver in accordance with Section 2.3;

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 41 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(b) provided that with respect to this Agreement, except for Section 12.1(a)(vii) and (viii), no indemnification will be provided under this Agreement for any:

(i) judgment or fine against, or any amount paid in settlement (without the written approval of the Receiver) by, any Indemnitee in connection with any action that seeks damages against any Indemnitee (a “ Counterclaim ”) arising with respect to any Acquired Asset and based on any action or inaction of either the Failed Bank, its directors, officers, employees or agents as such prior to the Bank Closing Date, unless any such judgment, fine or amount paid in settlement exceeds the greater of (A) the Repurchase Price of such Acquired Asset, or (B) the monetary recovery sought on such Acquired Asset by the Assuming Institution in the cause of action from which the Counterclaim arises; and in such event the Receiver will provide indemnification only in the amount of such excess; and no indemnification will be provided for any costs or expenses other than any costs or expenses (including attorneys’ fees) which, in the determination of the Receiver, have been actually and reasonably incurred by such Indemnitee in connection with the defense of any such Counterclaim; and it is expressly agreed that the Receiver reserves the right to intervene, in its discretion, on its behalf and/or on behalf of the Receiver, in the defense of any such Counterclaim;

(ii) claims with respect to any liability or obligation of the Failed Bank that is expressly assumed by the Assuming Institution pursuant to this Agreement or subsequent to the execution hereof by the Assuming Institution or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Assuming Institution;

(iii) claims with respect to any liability of the Failed Bank to any present or former employee as such of the Failed Bank or of any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Failed Bank, which liability is expressly assumed by the Assuming Institution pursuant to this Agreement or subsequent to the execution hereof by the Assuming Institution or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Assuming Institution;

(iv) claims based on the failure of any Indemnitee to seek recovery of damages from the Receiver for any claims based upon any action or inaction of the Failed Bank, its directors, officers, employees or agents as fiduciary, agent or custodian prior to the Bank Closing Date;

(v) claims based on any violation or alleged violation by any Indemnitee of the antitrust, branching, banking or bank holding company or securities laws of the United States of America or any State thereof;

(vi) claims based on the rights of any present or former creditor, customer, or supplier as such of the Assuming Institution or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Assuming Institution;

(vii) claims based on the rights of any present or former shareholder as such of the Assuming Institution or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Assuming Institution regardless of whether any such present or former shareholder is also a present or former shareholder of the Failed Bank;

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 42 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(viii) claims, if the Receiver determines that the effect of providing such indemnification would be to (A) expand or alter the provisions of any warranty or disclaimer thereof provided in Section 3.3 or any other provision of this Agreement, or (B) create any warranty not expressly provided under this Agreement;

(ix) claims which could have been enforced against any Indemnitee had the Assuming Institution not entered into this Agreement;

(x) claims based on any liability for taxes or fees assessed with respect to the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including without limitation any subsequent transfer of any Acquired Assets or Liabilities Assumed to any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Assuming Institution or [Ally 1] or [Ally 2];

(xi) except as expressly provided in this Article XII, claims based on any action or inaction of any Indemnitee, and nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to provide indemnification for (i) the Failed Bank, (ii) any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Failed Bank, or (iii) any present or former director, officer, employee or agent of the Failed Bank or its Subsidiaries or Affiliates; provided that the Receiver, in its sole and absolute discretion, may provide indemnification hereunder for any present or former director, officer, employee or agent of the Failed Bank or its Subsidiaries or Affiliates who is also or becomes a director, officer, employee or agent of the Assuming Institution or its Subsidiaries or Affiliates;

(xii) claims or actions which constitute a breach by the Assuming Institution of the representations and warranties contained in Article XI;

(xiii) claims arising out of or relating to the condition of or generated by an Acquired Asset arising from or relating to the presence, storage or release of any hazardous or toxic substance, or any pollutant or contaminant, or condition of such Acquired Asset which violate any applicable Federal, State or local law or regulation concerning environmental protection; and

(xiv) claims based on, related to or arising from any asset, including a loan, acquired or liability assumed by the Assuming Institution, other than pursuant to this Agreement;

(c) No indemnification will be provided pursuant to this Article XII to the Assuming Institution with respect to any asset or liability of the Failed Bank that was purchased or assumed by BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA as provided pursuant to the Alliance Agreement dated February 18, 2015, FIRSTBANK PUERTO RICO as provided pursuant to the Alliance Agreement dated February 18, 2015, AM PR LLC as provided pursuant to the Alliance Agreement dated February 18, 2015, or CENTENNIAL BANK as provided pursuant to the Alliance Agreement dated February 13, 2015.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 43 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


12.2. Conditions Precedent to Indemnification . It shall be a condition precedent to the obligation of the Receiver to indemnify any Indemnitee pursuant to this Article XII that such Indemnitee shall, with respect to any claim made or threatened against such Indemnitee for which such Indemnitee is or may be entitled to indemnification hereunder:

(a) give written notice to the Regional Counsel (Litigation Branch) of the Corporation in the manner and at the address provided in Section 13.6 of such claim as soon as practicable after such claim is made or threatened; provided that notice must be given on or before the date which is six (6) years from the date of this Agreement; any Indemnitee other than the Assuming Institution will give notice directly to the Receiver and not through the Assuming Institution;

(b) provide to the Receiver such information and cooperation with respect to such claim as the Receiver may reasonably require;

(c) cooperate and take all steps, as the Receiver may reasonably require, to preserve and protect any defense to such claim;

(d) in the event suit is brought with respect to such claim, upon reasonable prior notice, afford to the Receiver the right, which the Receiver may exercise in its sole and absolute discretion, to conduct the investigation, control the defense and effect settlement of such claim, including without limitation the right to designate counsel and to control all negotiations, litigation, arbitration, settlements, compromises and appeals of any such claim, all of which shall be at the expense of the Receiver; provided that the Receiver shall have notified the Person claiming indemnification in writing that such claim is a claim with respect to which such Person is entitled to indemnification under this Article XII;

(e) not incur any costs or expenses in connection with any response or suit with respect to such claim, unless such costs or expenses were incurred upon the written direction of the Receiver; provided that the Receiver shall not be obligated to reimburse the amount of any such costs or expenses unless such costs or expenses were incurred upon the written direction of the Receiver;

(f) not release or settle such claim or make any payment or admission with respect thereto, unless the Receiver consents thereto; provided that the Receiver shall not be obligated to reimburse the amount of any such settlement or payment unless such settlement or payment was effected upon the written direction of the Receiver; and

(g) take such reasonable action as the Receiver may request in writing as necessary to preserve, protect or enforce the rights of the Indemnitee against any Primary Indemnitor.

12.3. No Additional Warranty . Nothing in this Article XII shall be construed or deemed to (a) expand or otherwise alter any warranty or disclaimer thereof provided under Section 3.3 or any other provision of this Agreement with respect to, among other matters, the title, value, collectability, genuineness, enforceability, documentation, condition or freedom from liens or encumbrances, of any (i) Acquired Asset, or (ii) asset of the Failed Bank purchased by the Assuming Institution subsequent to the execution of this Agreement by the Assuming Institution or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Assuming Institution, or (b) create any warranty not expressly provided under this Agreement with respect thereto.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 44 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


12.4. Indemnification of Receiver and Corporation . From and after the Bank Closing Date, the Assuming Institution, BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA, FIRSTBANK PUERTO RICO, AM PR LLC, and CENTENNIAL BANK agree to indemnify and hold harmless the Corporation and the Receiver and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents from and against any and all costs, losses, liabilities, expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in connection with any of the following:

(a) claims based on any and all liabilities or obligations of the Failed Bank assumed by the Assuming Institution pursuant to this Agreement or subsequent to the execution hereof by the Assuming Institution or any Subsidiary or Affiliate of the Assuming Institution, whether or not any such liabilities subsequently are sold and/or transferred, other than any claim based upon any action or inaction of any Indemnitee as provided in Section 12.1(a)(vii) or (viii);

(b) claims based on any act or omission of any Indemnitee (including but not limited to claims of any Indemnitee claiming any right or title by or through the Assuming Institution with respect to Acquired Assets transferred to the Receiver pursuant to Section 3.4 or Section 3.6), other than any action or inaction of any Indemnitee as provided in (vii) or (viii) of Section 12.1(a); and

(c) claims based on any failure of the Assuming Institution to comply with any provision of Article VI.

12.5. Obligations Supplemental . The obligations of the Receiver, and the Corporation as guarantor in accordance with Section 12.7, to provide indemnification under this Article XII are to supplement any amount payable by any Primary Indemnitor to the Indemnitee indemnified under this Article XII. Consistent with that intent, the Receiver agrees only to make payments pursuant to such indemnification to the extent not payable by a Primary Indemnitor. If the aggregate amount of payments by the Receiver, or the Corporation as guarantor in accordance with Section 12.7, and all Primary Indemnitors with respect to any item of indemnification under this Article XII exceeds the amount payable with respect to such item, such Person being indemnified shall notify the Receiver thereof and, upon the request of the Receiver, shall promptly pay to the Receiver, or the Corporation as appropriate, the amount of the Receiver’s (or Corporation’s) payments to the extent of such excess.

12.6. Criminal Claims . Notwithstanding any provision of this Article XII to the contrary, in the event that any Person being indemnified under this Article XII shall become involved in any criminal action, suit or proceeding, whether judicial, administrative or investigative, the Receiver shall have no obligation hereunder to indemnify such Person for liability with respect to any criminal act or to the extent any costs or expenses are attributable to the defense against the allegation of any criminal act, unless (a) the Person is successful on the merits or otherwise in the defense against any such action, suit or proceeding, or (b) such action, suit or proceeding is terminated without the imposition of liability on such Person.

12.7. Limited Guaranty of the Corporation . The Corporation hereby guarantees performance of the Receiver’s obligation to indemnify the Indemnitees as set forth in this Article XII. It is a condition to the Corporation’s obligation hereunder that the Indemnitee shall comply in all respects with the applicable provisions of this Article XII. The Corporation shall be liable

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 45 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


hereunder only for such amounts, if any, as the Receiver is obligated to pay under the terms of this Article XII but shall fail to pay. Except as otherwise provided above in this Section 12.7, nothing in this Article XII is intended or shall be construed to create any liability or obligation on the part of the Corporation, the United States of America or any department or agency thereof under or with respect to this Article XII, or any provision hereof, it being the intention of the parties hereto that the obligations undertaken by the Receiver under this Article XII are the sole and exclusive responsibility of the Receiver and no other Person or entity.

12.8. Subrogation . Upon payment by the Receiver, or the Corporation as guarantor in accordance with Section 12.7, to any Indemnitee for any claims indemnified by the Receiver under this Article XII, the Receiver, or the Corporation as appropriate, shall become subrogated to all rights of the Indemnitee against any other Person to the extent of such payment.

12.9. Successor Liability under Puerto Rico Act 80 . Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, from and after Bank Closing:

(a) any claim by a Failed Bank employee against the Assuming Institution and based, in whole or in part, on any successor liability arising by operation of law pursuant to Puerto Rico Act No. 80 of May 30, 1976, as amended (“Act 80”), including a claim for severance or enhanced severance, shall be subject to indemnity under Section 12.1(a)(iii) and shall not be excluded from indemnity by reason of Section 12.1(b), other than a claim for salary for the period from the Bank Closing until the Assuming Institution determines not to retain a Failed Bank employee pursuant to Section 4.12; and

(b) any claim for severance or enhanced severance against the Assuming Institution by a Failed Bank employee not determined to be retained by the Assuming Institution pursuant to Section 4.12 shall, to the extent based on Act 80, be subject to indemnity under Section 12.1(a)(iii) and shall not be excluded from indemnity by reason of Section 12.1(b). The Assuming Institution shall not be subject to indemnification for (i) claims based upon the violation by the Assuming Institution of other statutes or provisions of the Puerto Rico constitution, or (ii) claims for severance or enhanced severance under subsection (b) of this section arising from terminations of employment by the Assuming Institution occurring after one year of the signing of this Agreement.

ARTICLE XIII. MISCELLANEOUS .

13.1. Costs, Fees, and Expenses . All fees, costs and expenses incurred by a party in connection with this Agreement (including the performance of any obligations or the exercise of any rights hereunder) shall be borne by such party unless expressly otherwise provided; provided that the Assuming Institution shall pay all fees, costs and expenses (other than attorneys’ fees incurred by the Receiver) incurred in connection with the transfer to it of any Acquired Assets or Liabilities Assumed hereunder or in accordance herewith. Further, the Assuming Institution shall be responsible for the payment of MERS routine transaction charges.

13.2. WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL . EACH PARTY HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 46 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


APPLICABLE LAW, ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN OR TO HAVE A JURY PARTICIPATE IN RESOLVING ANY DISPUTE, ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM, WHETHER SOUNDING IN CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

13.3. Consent; Determination or Discretion . When the consent or approval of a party is required under this Agreement, such consent or approval shall be obtained in writing and unless expressly otherwise provided, shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. When a determination or decision is to be made by a party under this Agreement, that party shall make such determination or decision in its reasonable discretion unless expressly otherwise provided.

13.4. Rights Cumulative . Except as expressly otherwise provided herein, the rights of each of the parties under this Agreement are cumulative, may be exercised as often as any party considers appropriate and are in addition to each such party’s rights under this Agreement, any of the agreements related thereto or under applicable law. Any failure to exercise or any delay in exercising any of such rights, or any partial or defective exercise of such rights, shall not operate as a waiver or variation of that or any other such right, unless expressly otherwise provided.

13.5. References . References in this Agreement to Recitals, Articles, Sections, Schedules and Exhibits are to Recitals, Articles, Sections, Schedules and Exhibits of this Agreement, respectively. References to parties are to the parties to this Agreement. Unless expressly otherwise provided, references to days and months are to calendar days and months respectively. In any case where a notice or other action is due on a day which is not a Business Day, such notice or other action may be delayed until the next-succeeding Business Day. Article and Section headings are for convenient reference and shall not affect the meaning of this Agreement. References to the singular shall include the plural, as the context may require, and vice versa .

13.6. Notice .

(a) Form of Notices . All notices shall be given in writing and provided in accordance with the provisions of this Section 13.6, unless expressly otherwise provided.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 47 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(b) Notice to the Receiver or the Corporation . With respect to a notice under this Agreement:

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

1601 Bryan Street

Dallas, Texas 75201

Attention: Settlement Agent

In addition, with respect to notices under Section 4.6, with a copy to:

BankPremiseNotice@fdic.gov

In addition, with respect to notice under Article XII:

Regional Counsel (Litigation Branch)

1601 Bryan Street

Dallas, TX 75201

In addition, with respect to communications under Exhibit 4.13 , a copy to:

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

1601 Bryan Street

Dallas, Texas 75201

Attention: Interim Servicing Manager,

(c) Notice to Assuming Institution . With respect to a notice under this Agreement:

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

209 Munoz Rivera Avenue

Hato Rey, PR 00918

Attention: Richard C. Carrion, CEO & Chmn

with a copy to: Javier D. Ferrer

Telephone: 787-763-6405

Facsimile: 787-756-0277

13.7. Entire Agreement . This Agreement, including the Schedules and Exhibits hereto and thereto, embody the entire agreement of the parties hereto in relation to the subject matter herein and supersede all prior understandings or agreements, oral or written, between the parties.

13.8. Counterparts . This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by the duly authorized representative of a different party hereto on separate counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same Agreement.

13.9. GOVERNING LAW . THIS AGREEMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS HEREUNDER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 48 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


ACCORDANCE WITH THE FEDERAL LAW OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND IN THE ABSENCE OF CONTROLLING FEDERAL LAW, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE IN WHICH THE MAIN OFFICE OF THE FAILED BANK IS LOCATED.

13.10. Successors and Assigns .

(a) Binding on Successors and Assigns; Assignment . All terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding on the successors and assigns of the Receiver, the Corporation and the Assuming Institution. The Receiver may assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement and the rights and obligations of the Receiver hereunder (in whole or in part) to the Corporation in its corporate capacity without the consent of Assuming Institution. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, the Assuming Institution may not assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement or any of the Assuming Institution’s rights or obligations hereunder (in whole or in part) without the prior written consent of the Receiver, which consent may be granted or withheld by the Receiver in its sole and absolute discretion.

(b) No Third Party Beneficiaries . Except as specified in (c), below, nothing expressed or referred to in this Agreement is intended or shall be construed to give any Person other than the Receiver, the Corporation and the Assuming Institution any legal or equitable right, remedy or claim under or with respect to this Agreement or any provisions contained herein, it being the intention of the parties hereto that this Agreement, the obligations and statements of responsibilities hereunder, and all other conditions and provisions hereof are for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Receiver, the Corporation and the Assuming Institution and for the benefit of no other Person.

(c) Specific Third Party Beneficiaries Under Article XII Only . BANCO POPULAR NORTH AMERICA, FIRSTBANK PUERTO RICO, AM PR LLC, and CENTENNIAL BANK are third party beneficiaries under Article XII of this Agreement, but only to the extent they meet the definition and conditions of as Indemnitee under this Agreement and the conditions under Article XII of this Agreement, and only for the term of this Agreement. These specified entities are not third party beneficiaries under any other Articles of this Agreement.

13.11. Modification . No amendment or other modification, rescission or release of any part of this Agreement, shall be effective except pursuant to a written agreement subscribed by the duly authorized representatives of the parties.

13.12. Manner of Payment . All payments due under this Agreement shall be in lawful money of the United States of America in immediately available funds as each party hereto may specify to the other parties; provided that in the event the Receiver or the Corporation is obligated to make any payment hereunder in the amount of $25,000.00 or less, such payment may be made by check.

13.13. Waiver . Each of the Receiver, the Corporation and the Assuming Institution may waive its respective rights, powers or privileges under this Agreement; provided that such waiver shall be in writing; and further provided that no failure or delay on the part of the Receiver, the Corporation or the Assuming Institution to exercise any right, power or privilege under this

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 49 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Agreement shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor will any single or partial exercise of any right, power or privilege under this Agreement preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege by the Receiver, the Corporation or the Assuming Institution under this Agreement, nor will any such waiver operate or be construed as a future waiver of such right, power or privilege under this Agreement.

13.14. Severability . If any provision of this Agreement is declared invalid or unenforceable, then, to the extent possible, all of the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall be binding upon the parties hereto.

13.15. Term of Agreement . This Agreement shall continue in full force and effect until the sixth (6th) anniversary of the Bank Closing Date; provided that the provisions of Sections 6.3 and 6.4 shall survive the expiration of the term of this Agreement; and provided further that the receivership of the Failed Bank may be terminated prior to the expiration of the term of this Agreement, and in such event, the guaranty of the Corporation, as provided in and in accordance with the provisions of Section 12.7, shall be in effect for the remainder of the term of this Agreement. Expiration of the term of this Agreement shall not affect any claim or liability of any party with respect to any (a) amount which is owing at the time of such expiration, regardless of when such amount becomes payable, and (b) breach of this Agreement occurring prior to such expiration, regardless of when such breach is discovered.

13.16. Survival of Covenants, Etc . The covenants, representations, and warranties in this Agreement shall survive the execution of this Agreement and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereunder.

13.17 Right of Receiver or Corporation to Audit . The Receiver or the Corporation, their respective agents, contractors and employees, may (but are not required to) perform an audit to determine the Assuming Institution’s compliance with this Agreement at any time, by providing not less than ten (10) Business Days prior notice. The scope and duration of any such audit shall be at the discretion of the Receiver or the Corporation, as the case may be. The Receiver or the Corporation, as the case may be, shall bear the expense of any such audit. In the event that any corrections are necessary as a result of such an audit, the Assuming Institution and the Receiver shall make such accounting adjustments, payments and withholdings as may be necessary to give retroactive effect to such corrections.

[Signature Page Follows]

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 50 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the date first above written.

 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION,

RECEIVER OF DORAL BANK

SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO
BY:

 

NAME:

 

TITLE:

 

Attest:

 

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
BY:

 

NAME:

 

TITLE:

 

Attest:

 

BANCO POPULAR DE PUERTO RICO
BY:

 

NAME:

 

TITLE:

 

Attest:

 

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 51 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

SCHEDULE 2.1(a) EXCLUDED DEPOSIT LIABILITY ACCOUNTS Doral Bank has deposits associated with the Depository Organization (DO) Cede & Co as Nominee for DTC. The DO accounts do not pass to the Assuming Bank and are excluded from the transaction as described in section 2.1 of the P&A Agreement. The attached Schedule 2.1.a DO Detail Report identifies the DO accounts as of 12/31/2014. The attached Schedule 2.1 a “Exhibit B” identifies a DFC Holding Company account that will not pass to the Assuming institution and is excluded from the transaction as described in section 2.1 of the P&A Agreement. This schedule will be updated post closing with data as of Bank Closing date. As of 12/31/2015 Stated Current Coupon Maturity Outstanding Issue Cusip Position ID Rate All-In Cost Date Balance Price Book Value

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 52 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 53 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 54 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 55 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 56 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

1.22 1.43 703,891,000 702,729,322
Schedule 2.1 a “Exhibit B”
Schedule 2.1a (Deposits excluded)
Date Last Class Category Product DDA Current Updated Code Number Account Balance 02/24/2015 8 DDA AFFILIATES DFC 10111 240000112 $151,462.96
Total $151,462.96

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 57 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


SCHEDULE 3.1(h)

ACQUIRED SUBSIDIARIES

NONE.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 58 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

SCHEDULE 3.1(n)
ACQUIRED ASSETS IN OPTIONAL LOAN POOLS
Loan Pools 10, 20, 30, 60, Performing 80, 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500. Detailed lists to be attached at closing.
ASSETS SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED FROM ANY OF THE OPTIONAL LOAN POOLS
Schedule 3.1(n) Excluded Items
1.) The capital stock of Doral Money, Inc.
2.) Revolving Credit Grid Note dated October 12, 2011 in the amount of $2.5 billion from Doral Money, Inc. payable to Doral Bank.
(This $2.5 billion revolving credit agreement between Doral Money, Inc. and Doral Bank is dated October 12, 2011 of which the balance outstanding as of 12/31/14 $188,145,055.90 . This note is part of the “Doral Money Asset Package.”
3.) Doral Bank GL Account #340000050 as of 12/31/14: $2,924,803.21 4.) Doral Bank GL Account #340000054 as of 12/31/14: $154.04 5.) Doral Bank GL Account #567000050 as of 12/31/14: ($3,266.26) 6.) Any other related accounts and or GL accounts between Doral Bank and Doral Money, Inc.
7.) An assignment of the Doral Bank’s Collateral Management Rights and obligations in CLO I, CLO II, and CLO III
8.) Mortgage Servicing Rights (MSR’s)
9.) All Mortgage Servicing Advances

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 59 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


SCHEDULE 3.1(o)

OTHER REAL ESTATE

NONE.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 60 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


SCHEDULE 3.2

PURCHASE PRICE OF ACQUIRED ASSETS

 

(a) cash and receivables from depository institutions, including cash items in the process of collection, plus interest thereon: Book Value
(b) securities (exclusive of the capital stock of Acquired Subsidiaries and FHLB stock), plus interest thereon: As provided in Section 3.2(b)
(c) federal funds sold and repurchase agreements, if any, including interest thereon: Book Value
(d) Loans, other than those in Optional Loan Pools: Book Value
(e) credit card business: Book Value
(f) safe deposit business, safekeeping business and trust business, if any: Book Value
(g) Failed Bank Records and other documents: Book Value
(h) Loans in Optional Loan Pools: As set forth on the Bid Form
(i) all repossessed collateral, such as boats, motor vehicles, aircraft, trailers, and fire arms Book Value
(j) capital stock of any Acquired Subsidiaries (subject to Section 3.2(b), and FHLB stock: Book Value
(k) amounts owed to the Failed Bank by any Acquired Subsidiaries: Book Value
(l) assets securing Deposits of public money, to the extent not otherwise purchased hereunder: Book Value
(m) overdrafts of customers: Book Value
(n) rights, if any, with respect to Qualified Financial Contracts: As provided in Section 3.2(c)

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 61 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(o) rights of the Failed Bank to have loan servicing provided to the Failed Bank by others and related contracts: Book Value
(p) Personal Computers and Owned Data Management Equipment: Fair Market Value
(q) Safe Deposit Boxes Fair Market Value
Assets subject to an option to purchase:

(a)

Bank Premises with a fixed price: As set forth on the Bid Form
All other Bank Premises Fair Market Value

(b)

Furniture and Equipment: Fair Market Value

(c)

Fixtures: Fair Market Value

(d)

Other Equipment: Fair Market Value

(e)

Specialty Assets Fair Market Value

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 62 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

SCHEDULE 3.1(o) OTHER REAL ESTATE
NONE.
SCHEDULE 3.5(l) EXCLUDED SECURITIES
ORIGINAL MATURITY
CUSIP ASSET NAME/DESCRIPTION FACE/PAR DATE BOOK VALUE
TOTAL $

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 63 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


SCHEDULE 4.1(b)

BANK PREMISES IN UNDERSERVED AREAS

NONE.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 64 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


SCHEDULE 6.3

DATA RETENTION CATALOG

FDIC Data Management Services (DMS)

Acquirer Data Retention Catalog

Version 3.0

Failed Institution

Name

Data Center Address

Assuming Institution

Name

Address

DRC Preparation Date

DRC Preparer’s Contact

Name

Designation

Phone

Email

Alternate Contact for Subsequent Data Requests (if different from above)

Name

Phone

Email

Instructions

 

1. Provide preparer’s contact information and Bank information on the “Cover Page” tab.

 

2. Provide point of contact and desired procedure for data requests on the “Data Request Procedure” Tab.

 

3. Provide the requested application retention details on “Data Retention” tab of this workbook.

 

  a. Update provided application list with any additional systems that were not included

 

  b. Select the most appropriate value from the drop down list when the list is provided with applicable column.

If you need additional clarification while recording the information, please call Kevin Sheehan (FDIC) at 703-562-2012 or Leslie Bowie (FDIC ) at 703-562-6262 . Send the final copy of this document to FDICDRCSubmission@fdic.gov.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 65 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 66 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

SCHEDULE 7
The accounts identified below will pass to the Assuming Institution (unless otherwise noted). When calculating the premium to be paid on Assumed Deposits in a purchase and assumption transaction, the FDIC will exclude the following categories of deposit accounts:
Category Description Amount
I Non-DO Brokered Deposits $ 5,593,180.00 II CDARS $ 0.00 III Market Place Deposits $429,501,760.35 IV Employee Account Branch – 88PR (2/16/2015) $125,831,290.41 Total deposits excluded from calculation of premium $560,926,230.76
Category Description I. Brokered Deposits
Brokered deposit accounts are accounts for which the “depositor of record” is an agent, nominee or custodian who deposits funds for a principal or principals to whom “pass-through” deposit insurance coverage may be extended. The FDIC separates brokered deposit accounts into two categories: 1) Depository Organization (DO) Brokered Deposits and 2) Non-Depository Organization (Non-DO) Brokered Deposits. This distinction is made by the FDIC to facilitate our role as Receiver and Insurer. These terms will not appear on other “brokered deposit” reports generated by Doral Bank Bank.
Non-DO Brokered Deposits pass to the Assuming Institution, but are excluded from Assumed Deposits when the deposit premium is calculated. Please see the attached “Schedule 7 – Non-DO Broker Deposit Detail Report” for a listing of these accounts. This list will be updated post closing with balances as of the Bank Closing Date.
Doral Bank has DO Brokered Deposits (Cede & Co as Nominee for DTC) and they are excluded from Assumed Deposits in the Purchase and Assumption Agreement.
II. CDARS
CDARS deposits pass to the Assuming Institution, but are excluded from Assumed Deposits when the deposit premium is calculated.
Doral Bank did not participate in the CDARS program as of the date of the deposit download. If CDARS deposits are taken between the date of the deposit download and the Bank Closing Date, they will be identified post closing and made part of Schedule 7 to the Purchase and Assumption Agreement.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 67 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

III. Market Place Deposits
“Market Place Deposits” is a description given to deposits that may ® have been solicited via a money desk, internet subscription service (for example, QwickRate ), or similar programs.
Doral Bank does have Internet deposits as identified above. The Internet deposits are reported as time deposits in the Call Report. Doral Bank uses “Branch 62NY and 63NY on their system to identify Internet deposits. Please see the attached “Schedule 7 – Internet Deposit Detail Report” for a listing of these accounts as of December 31, 2014. This list will be updated post closing with balances as of the Bank Closing Date.
IV. 88PR – Employee Account Branch Deposits
“Employee Account Branch Deposits” have been identified as being mostly Doral Bank (including subsidiaries and affiliates) owned deposits and not core deposits. Doral Bank uses “Branch 88PR” on their system to identify these deposits. No deposit premium will be paid on these accounts as they are mostly internal accounts and thus primarily not customers.
This schedule provides account categories and balances as of the date of the deposit download, or as indicated. The deposit franchise bid premium will be calculated using account categories and balances as of the Bank Closing Date that are reflected in the general ledger or subsystem as described above. The final numbers for Schedule 7 will be provided post closing.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 68 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

Schedule 7 – Deposit Detail Report—Non-DO Broker
Account Number Insured Amount XX Amount PH Amount

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 69 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

Totals $0.00 $0.00 $5,593,179.93

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 70 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

Schedule 7 – Deposit Detail Report—QwickRate®
Accrued Branch Account No City State Current Balance Interest

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 71 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 72 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 73 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 74 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 75 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 76 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 77 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 78 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 79 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 80 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 81 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 82 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 83 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 84 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 85 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 86 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 87 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 88 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 89 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 90 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 91 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 92 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 93 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 94 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 95 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 96 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 97 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 98 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 99 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 100 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 101 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 102 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 103 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 104 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 105 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 106 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 107 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 108 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 109 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 110 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 111 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 112 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 113 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 114 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 115 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 116 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 117 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 118 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 119 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 120 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 121 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 122 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 123 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 124 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 125 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 126 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 127 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 128 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

Totals $428,997,680.67 $504,079.68

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 129 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

Employee Account Branch – 88PR
AS-OF 02062015
BANK OWNED Branch AcctNumConcat CurrBal AccrInt ACCT

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 130 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 131 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 132 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 133 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 134 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 135 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 136 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 137 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 138 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 139 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 140 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 141 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 142 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 143 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 144 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 145 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 146 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 147 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 148 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 149 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 150 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 151 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 152 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 153 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 154 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 155 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 156 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 157 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 158 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 159 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 160 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 161 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 162 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 163 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 164 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 165 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 166 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 167 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 168 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 169 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 170 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 171 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 172 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 173 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 174 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 175 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 176 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 177 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 178 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 179 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 180 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 181 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


LOGO

125,982,371.33 382.04
Bank Owned 123,896,977.01
Non-Bank Owned 2,085,394.32 382.04

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 182 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


EXHIBIT 2.3A

FINAL LEGAL NOTICE

Claiming Requirements for Deposits

Under 12 U.S.C. 1822(e)

[Date]

[Name of Unclaimed Depositor]

[Address of Unclaimed Depositor]

[Anytown, USA]

 

Subject: [XXXXX – Name of Bank
City, State] – In Receivership

Dear [Sir/Madam]:

As you may know, on [Date: Closing Date] , the [Name of Bank ( The Bank )] was closed and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) transferred [The Bank’s] accounts to [Name of Assuming Institution].

According to federal law under 12 U.S.C., 1822(e), on [Date: eighteen months from the Closing Date] , [Name of Assuming Institution] must transfer the funds in your account(s) back to the FDIC if you have not claimed your account(s) with [Name of Assuming Institution]. Based on the records recently supplied to us by [Name of Assuming Institution] , your account(s) currently fall into this category.

This letter is your formal Legal Notice that you have until [Date: eighteen months from the Closing Date] , to claim or arrange to continue your account(s) with [Name of Assuming Institution]. There are several ways that you can claim your account(s) at [Name of Assuming Institution] . It is only necessary for you to take any one of the following actions in order for your account(s) at [Name of Assuming Institution] to be deemed claimed. In addition, if you have more than one account, your claim to one account will automatically claim all accounts:

 

1. Write to [Name of Assuming Institution] and notify them that you wish to keep your account(s) active with them. Please be sure to include the name of the account(s), the account number(s), the signature of an authorized signer on the account(s), name, and address. [Name of Assuming Institution] address is:

[123 Main Street

Anytown, USA]

 

2. Execute a new signature card on your account(s), enter into a new deposit agreement with [Name of Assuming Institution], change the ownership on your account(s), or renegotiate the terms of your certificate of deposit account(s) (if any).

 

3. Provide [Name of Assuming Institution] with a change of address form.

 

4. Make a deposit to or withdrawal from your account(s). This includes writing a check on any account or having an automatic direct deposit credited to or an automatic withdrawal debited from an account.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 183 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


If you do not want to continue your account(s) with [Name of Assuming Institution] for any reason, you can withdraw your funds and close your account(s). Withdrawing funds from one or more of your account(s) satisfies the federal law claiming requirement. If you have time deposits, such as certificates of deposit, [Name of Assuming Institution] can advise you how to withdraw them without being charged an interest penalty for early withdrawal.

If you do not claim ownership of your account(s) at [Name of Assuming Institution by Date: eighteen months from the Closing Date] federal law requires [Name of Assuming Institution] to return your deposits to the FDIC, which will deliver them as unclaimed property to the State indicated in your address in the Failed Institution’s records. If your address is outside of the United States, the FDIC will deliver the deposits to the State in which the Failed Institution had its main office. 12 U.S.C. § 1822(e). If the State accepts custody of your deposits, you will have 10 years from the date of delivery to claim your deposits from the State. After 10 years you will be permanently barred from claiming your deposits. However, if the State refuses to take custody of your deposits, you will be able to claim them from the FDIC until the receivership is terminated. If you have not claimed your insured deposits before the receivership is terminated, and a receivership may be terminated at any time, all of your rights in those deposits will be barred.

If you have any questions or concerns about these items, please contact [Bank Employee] at [Name of Assuming Institution] by phone at [(XXX) XXX-XXXX].

Sincerely,

[Name of Claims Specialist]

[Title]

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 184 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


EXHIBIT 2.3B

AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING

AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING

State of

COUNTY OF

I am employed as a [Title of Office] by the [Name of Assuming Institution] .

This will attest that on [Date of mailing] , I caused a true and correct copy of the Final Legal Notice, attached hereto, to owners of unclaimed deposits of [Name of Failed Bank] , City, State, to be prepared for deposit in the mail of the United States of America on behalf of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. A list of depositors to whom the notice was mailed is attached. This notice was mailed to the depositor’s last address as reflected on the books and records of the [Name of Failed Bank] as of the date of failure.

 

 

[Name]
[Title of Office]
[Name of Assuming Institution]

Subscribed and sworn to before me this      day of [Month, Year].

My commission expires:

 

 

 

[Name], Notary Public

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 185 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


EXHIBIT 3.2(c)

VALUATION OF CERTAIN

QUALIFIED FINANCIAL CONTRACTS

 

A. Scope

Interest Rate Contracts - All interest rate swaps, forward rate agreements, interest rate futures, caps, collars and floors, whether purchased or written.

Option Contracts - All put and call option contracts, whether purchased or written, on marketable securities, financial futures, foreign currencies, foreign exchange or foreign exchange futures contracts.

Foreign Exchange Contracts - All contracts for future purchase or sale of foreign currencies, foreign currency or cross currency swap contracts, or foreign exchange futures contracts.

 

B. Exclusions

All financial contracts used to hedge assets and liabilities that are acquired by the Assuming Institution but are not subject to adjustment from Book Value.

 

C. Adjustment

The difference between the Book Value and market value as of the Bank Closing Date.

 

D. Methodology

1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply:

 

  (i) All known cash flows under swaps or forward exchange contracts shall be present valued to the swap zero coupon interest rate curve.

 

  (ii) All valuations shall employ prices and interest rates based on the actual frequency of rate reset or payment.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 186 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


  (iii) Each tranche of amortizing contracts shall be separately valued. The total value of such amortizing contract shall be the sum of the values of its component tranches.

 

  (iv) For regularly traded contracts, valuations shall be at the midpoint of the bid and ask prices quoted by customary sources (e.g., The Wall Street Journal, Telerate, Reuters or other similar source) or regularly traded exchanges.

 

  (v) For all other Qualified Financial Contracts where published market quotes are unavailable, the adjusted price shall be the average of the bid and ask price quotes from three (3) securities dealers acceptable to the Receiver and Assuming Institution as of the Bank Closing Date. If quotes from securities dealers cannot be obtained, an appraiser acceptable to the Receiver and the Assuming Institution will perform a valuation based on modeling, correlation analysis, interpolation or other techniques, as appropriate.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 187 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


EXHIBIT 4.13

INTERIM ASSET SERVICING ARRANGEMENT

This Interim Asset Servicing Arrangement is made pursuant to and as of the date of that certain Purchase and Assumption Agreement (the “ Purchase and Assumption Agreement ”) among the Receiver, the Assuming Institution and the Corporation, to which this Arrangement is attached. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Exhibit 4.13 shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.

(a) With respect to each asset or liability designated from time to time by the Receiver to be serviced by the Assuming Institution pursuant to this Interim Asset Servicing Arrangement (the “ Arrangement ”), including any assets or liabilities sold or conveyed by the Receiver to any party other than the Assuming Institution (any such party, a “ Successor Owner ”) but with respect to which the Receiver has an obligation to service or provide servicing support (such assets and liabilities, the “ Pool Assets ”), for certain loans (the “ Loans ”) during the term of this Arrangement the Assuming Institution shall service or provide servicing support to the Pool Assets as described in this Exhibit 4.13.

If the Assuming Institution is an approved or qualified servicer for any government sponsored entity (each, a “ GSE ”) or GNMA and if any of the Loans are owned by a GSE or GNMA, the Assuming Institution shall service or provide servicing support for the Loans owned by a GSE or GNMA in accordance with the guidelines promulgated by and its agreements with the applicable GSE or GNMA. If the Assuming Institution is not an approved or qualified servicer for a GSE or GNMA or the Loans are not owned by a GSE or GNMA, then the Assuming Institution shall service or provide servicing support for the Loans in accordance with the following:

(i) promptly post and apply payments received to the applicable system of record;

(ii) reverse and return insufficient funds checks;

(iii) pay (A) participation payments to participants in Loans, as and when received; (B) tax and insurance bills, as they come due, out of any escrow funds maintained for such purposes; and (C) unfunded commitments and protective advances out of any escrow funds created for such purposes;

(iv) process funding draws under Loans and protective advances in connection with collateral and acquired property, in each case, as and to the extent authorized and funded by the Receiver;

(v) maintain in use all data processing equipment and systems and other systems of record on which any activity with respect to any Pool Assets are, or prior to the Bank Closing Date, were, recorded, and maintain all historical data on any such systems as of the Bank

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 188 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


Closing Date and not, without the express consent of the Receiver (which consent must be sought at least sixty (60) days prior to taking any action), deconvert, remove, transfer or otherwise discontinue use of any of the Failed Bank’s systems of record with respect to any Pool Asset;

(vi) maintain accurate records reflecting (A) payments received by the Assuming Institution, (B) information received by the Assuming Institution concerning changes in the address or identity of any Obligor and (C) other servicing actions taken by the Assuming Institution, including checks returned for insufficient funds;

(vii) send (A) billing statements to Obligors on Pool Assets (to the extent that such statements were sent by the Failed Bank or as are requested by the Receiver) and (B) notices to Obligors who are in default on Loans (in the same manner as the Failed Bank or as are requested by the Receiver);

(viii) employ a sufficient number of qualified employees to provide the services required to be provided by the Assuming Institution pursuant to this Arrangement (with the number and qualifications of such employees to be not less than the number and qualifications of employees employed by the Failed Bank to perform such functions as of the Bank Closing Date);

(ix) hold in trust any Credit Files and any servicing files in the possession or on the premises of the Assuming Institution for the Receiver or the Successor Owner (as applicable) and segregate from the other books and records of the Assuming Institution and appropriately mark such Credit Files and servicing files to clearly reflect the ownership interest of the Receiver or the successor owner (as applicable);

(x) send to the Receiver (indicating closed bank name and number), Attn: Interim Servicing Manager, at the email address provided in Section 13.6 of the Purchase and Assumption Agreement, or to such other person at such address as the Receiver may designate, via overnight delivery: (A) on a weekly basis, weekly reports, including, without limitation, reports reflecting collections and trial balances, and (B) any other reports, copies or information as may be requested from time to time by the Receiver, including, if requested, copies of (1) checks or other remittances received, (2) insufficient funds checks returned, (3) checks or other remittances for payment to participants or for taxes, insurance, funding advances and protective advances, (4) pay-off requests, and (5) notices to defaulted Obligors;

(xi) remit on a weekly basis to the Receiver (indicating closed bank name and number), Attn: DRR Cashier Unit, Business Operations Support Branch, in the same manner as provided in paragraph (a)(x), via wire transfer to the account designated by the Receiver, or to such other person at such other address and/or account as the Receiver may designate, all payments received;

(xii) prepare and timely file all information reports with appropriate tax authorities, and, if requested by the Receiver, prepare and file tax returns and remit taxes due on or before the due date;

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 189 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(xiii) provide and furnish such other services, operations or functions, including, without limitation, with regard to any business, enterprise or agreement which is a Pool Asset, as may be requested by the Receiver;

(xiv) establish a custodial account for the Receiver and for each successor owner at the Assuming Institution, each of which shall be interest bearing, titled in the name of Assuming Institution, in trust for the Receiver or the successor owner (as applicable), in each case as the owner, and segregate and hold all funds collected and received with respect to the Pool Assets separate and apart from any of the Assuming Institution’s own funds and general assets; and

(xv) no later than the end of the second Business Day following receipt thereof, deposit into the applicable custodial account and retain therein all funds collected and received with respect to the Pool Assets.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Exhibit, the Assuming Institution shall not be required to initiate litigation or other collection proceedings against any Obligor or any collateral with respect to any defaulted Loan. The Assuming Institution shall promptly notify the Receiver, at the address referred to above in paragraph (a)(x), of any claims or legal actions regarding any Pool Asset.

(b) In consideration for the provision of the services provided pursuant to this Arrangement, the Receiver agrees to reimburse the Assuming Institution for the actual, reasonable and necessary expenses incurred in connection with the performance of its duties pursuant to this Arrangement, including shared services of photocopying, postage, express mail, core data processing (allocated on a per loan basis based on historical actual costs) and amounts paid for employee services (based upon the number of hours spent performing servicing duties).

(c) The Assuming Institution shall provide the services described herein for a term of up to one hundred-eighty (180) days after the Bank Closing Date. The Receiver may terminate the Arrangement at any time upon not less than sixty (60) days notice to the Assuming Institution without any liability or cost to the Receiver other than the fees and expenses due to the Assuming Institution as of the termination date pursuant to paragraph (b) above.

(d) At any time during the term of this Arrangement, the Receiver may, upon not less than thirty (30) days prior written notice to the Assuming Institution, remove one or more Pool Assets, and at the time of such removal the Assuming Institution’s responsibility with respect thereto shall terminate.

(e) At the expiration of this Arrangement or upon the termination of the Assuming Institution’s responsibility with respect to any Pool Asset pursuant to paragraph (d) hereof, the Assuming Institution shall:

(i) deliver to the Receiver (or its designee) all of the Credit Documents and records relating to the Pool Assets; and

(ii) cooperate with the Receiver to facilitate the orderly transition of managing the Pool Assets to the Receiver or its designees (including, without limitation, its contractors and persons to which any Pool Assets are conveyed).

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 190 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR


(f) At the request of the Receiver, the Assuming Institution shall perform such transitional services with regard to the Pool Assets as the Receiver may request. Transitional services may include, without limitation, assisting in any due diligence process deemed necessary by the Receiver and providing to the Receiver and its designees (including, without limitation, its contractors and any actual or potential successor owners) (i) information and data regarding the Pool Assets, including, without limitation, system reports and data downloads sufficient to transfer the Pool Assets to another system or systems and to facilitate due diligence by actual and potential successor owners, and (ii) access to employees of the Assuming Institution involved in the management of, or otherwise familiar with, the Pool Assets.

(g) Until such time as the Arrangement expires or is terminated, without limitation of its obligations set forth above or in the Purchase and Assumption Agreement and without any additional consideration (other than that set forth in paragraph (b) above), the Assuming Institution shall provide the Receiver and its designees (including, without limitation, its contractors and actual and potential successor owners) with the following, as the same may be requested:

(i) access to and the ability to obtain assistance and information from personnel of the Assuming Institution, including former personnel of the Failed Bank and personnel of third party consultants;

(ii) access to and the ability to use and download information from data processing systems and other systems of record on which information regarding Pool Assets or any assets transferred to or liabilities assumed by the Assuming Institution is stored or maintained (regardless of whether information with respect to other assets or liabilities is also stored or maintained thereon); and

(iii) access to and the ability to use and occupy office space (including parking facilities and vault space), facilities, utilities (including local telephone service and facsimile machines), furniture, equipment (including photocopying and facsimile machines), and technology and connectivity (including email accounts, network access and technology resources such as shared drives) in the Bank Premises occupied by the Assuming Institution.

 

Basic P&A Agreement – 2/26/15 191 Doral Bank
Version 6.4P – P URCHASE AND A SSUMPTION A GREEMENT San Juan, PR

Exhibit 12.1

POPULAR, INC.

COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

(Dollars in thousands)

 

     Year ended December 31,  
     2014 (1)     2013      2012      2011      2010  

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting changes

   ($ 156,892   $ 320,305      $ 160,282      $ 239,148      $ 242,942  

Fixed charges:

             

Interest expense and capitalized interest

     688,280       315,685        379,086        505,523        653,603  

Estimated interest component of net rental payments

     11,665       9,874        9,752        13,470        26,688  

Total fixed charges including interest on deposits

     699,945       325,559        388,838        518,993        680,291  

Less: Interest on deposits

     105,087       137,364        184,089        269,487        350,881  

Total fixed charges excluding interest on deposits

     594,858       188,195        204,749        249,506        329,410  

Income before income taxes and fixed charges (including interest on deposits)

   $ 543,053     $ 645,864      $ 549,120      $ 758,141      $ 923,233  

Income (loss) before income taxes and fixed charges (excluding interest on deposits)

   $ 437,966     $ 508,500      $ 365,031      $ 488,654      $ 572,352  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

             

Including interest on deposits

     (A )     2.0        1.4        1.5        1.4  

Excluding interest on deposits

     (A )     2.7        1.8        2.0        1.7  

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends

             

Including interest on deposits

     (A )     2.0        1.4        1.4        1.4  

Excluding interest on deposits

     (A )     2.6        1.8        1.9        1.7  

 

(1) The computation of earnings to fixed charges and preferred stock dividends excludes the results of discontinued operations.
(A) During 2014, earnings were not sufficient to cover fixed charges or preferred stock dividends and the ratios were less than 1:1. The Corporation would have had to generate additional earnings of approximately $161 million to achieve ratios of 1:1 in the corresponding period of 2014.

Exhibit 13.1

LOGO

 

POPULAR, INC. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT

POPULAR, INC.

Year in Review

THE REPAYMENT OF THE TARP FUNDS BETTER POSITIONS US FOR MORE ACTIVE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IN THE FUTURE.

RICHARD L. CARRIÓN

Chairman &

Chief Executive Officer

In 2014 we achieved significant milestones and made important progress on various fronts.

The repayment of TARP and the restructuring of our U.S. operations were two of our main achievements during the year. Including the impact of these events, we reported a net loss of $313 million. Although these actions affected the year’s results, we are now in a much stronger position moving forward. Adjusted net income for the year, excluding these events, was $301 million. These solid results in 2014 were driven by higher net interest income due to lower interest expense, a lower provision for loan losses, lower operating expenses, mainly pension costs and FDIC insurance, and lower income taxes.

Credit quality remained stable despite the challenging economic conditions in Puerto Rico. Net charge-offs declined in Puerto Rico and the United States, both in absolute terms as well as a percentage of loans. Non-performing loans as a percentage of total loans closed 2014 at 2.95%, fairly stable when compared to the previous year if we exclude loan balances from the regions that were sold as part of the U.S. restructuring. While we remain vigilant due to economic conditions in Puerto Rico, we are encouraged by the general performance of our portfolios.

We continue to enjoy strong capital levels relative to peers and regulatory requirements. Our Tier 1 common equity ratio stood at 15.9% at year-end, or 110 basis points higher than in 2013, which still included our TARP capital. The repayment of TARP funds, completed in

July of 2014 without issuing additional equity, better positions us for more active capital management in the future.

The restructuring of our U.S. operations was a defining event of 2014. In April, we announced our plan to sell our California, Chicago and Central Florida regions in order to focus our business on the New York Metro and Miami regions. The plan also includes the transfer of most support functions to Puerto Rico and New York to leverage the talent and infrastructure we have in place in our headquarters and to benefit from Puerto Rico’s lower personnel cost structure. During the course of the year, we completed the sale of the three regions and made significant progress in the operational restructuring. Once the transfer of support functions is completed in the first half of 2015, we will have reduced the number of back-office employees supporting our U.S. operations by 43%, with approximately two-thirds of them based in Puerto Rico. I would like to acknowledge the hard work of all of our colleagues at Popular Community Bank and those supporting them in Puerto Rico that have made possible the successful execution of an extremely complex restructuring project. We are now ready to move forward with a leaner, more focused operation in the U.S.

Our franchise in Puerto Rico was strengthened in 2014. We increased our market share in most categories and maintained our leadership position in the majority of them. In the auto business, where we have intensified our sales efforts, we reached the second position in the market for the first time. Despite a weak

Exhibit 13.1

1


LOGO

 

POPULAR, INC.

Year in Review

FUNDACIÓN BANCO POPULAR AND THE COMMUNITY BANK FOUNDATION DONATED OVER $3.1 MILLION TO 128 NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS.

Puerto Rico economy, we also experienced growth in the corporate segment.

We deepened our efforts to enhance service and offer greater convenience to our clients. Most business units improved their customer satisfaction metrics. Results reflect the conscientious effort of all groups, as well as initiatives related to efficiency that have also had a positive impact on customer satisfaction. The redesign of branch processes, based on the LEAN methodology, was completed in 17% of our branches which account for 28% of total transactions. Results to date in these branches show higher service levels and significant reductions in waiting times. As we roll out this project to other branches, we expect to see additional improvements in our customer satisfaction. We also continued the implementation of projects designed to transform our retail delivery network, placing a greater emphasis on digital transactions. The digitalization of our clients’ interactions is a critical move to offer convenient alternatives and generate cost efficiencies. In December of 2014, deposits made through automatic teller

machines (ATMs) in Puerto Rico reached 29% of deposits in branches with upgraded ATMs, compared to 17% in December of 2013. At the same time we migrate transactional, service and sales interactions to digital channels, we will revise our physical footprint in order to meet our clients’ needs in a more effective way.

We also embarked on several key initiatives regarding our most important asset – our people. In August, we increased the minimum hourly base salary for all our employees in Puerto Rico to $9.00, which applied to approximately 2,400 of our colleagues. In 2015 we will increase salaries to $10.00 for those employees demonstrating good performance. We are well aware that it is critical to attract, retain and develop the best talent available in order to reach our ambitious goals. We are convinced that this investment will produce benefits in terms of retention, engagement, customer service and productivity. Another important event this year was the inauguration of the On-Site

Health and Wellness Center in Puerto Rico, focused on the prevention and early detection of health conditions. The objective of this innovative approach is to improve the health of our employees, which will translate into lower medical expenses and increased productivity. As a result of these and other efforts, our employee engagement metrics, which were already solid, improved even more in 2014. We are continuously raising the bar, expecting a higher level of performance from our employees. We feel confident that our focus on performance, coupled with the investments we are making on our people, make them our strongest competitive advantage.

Our commitment to our communities continued unabated. We expanded our financial education program Finance in Your Hands, which has reached over 100,000 individuals in Puerto Rico and was recognized by the American Banking Association as the best financial education program in the United States. We remain committed to Echar Pa’lante, a multisectoral social collaboration

-40% -30% -20% -10% 0% 10% 20% 30%

DEC-13

JAN-14

FEB-14

MAR-14 BPOP APR-14 STOCK MAY-14 PRICE JUN-14 CHANGE JUL-14

vs.

AUG-14 PEERS SEPT-14

OCT-14 (2013-2014)

NOV-14

DEC-14

-32% 7% 8% 19%

PRUS Peers KBW Peers BPOP

Index

2


LOGO

 

POPULAR, INC. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT

program we launched in 2011, that has brought together over 300 organizations and experts to foster education and entrepreneurship. Employee contributions to our foundations increased in 2014, reaching $730,000. In large part thanks to these contributions, Fundación Banco Popular and the Popular Community Bank Foundation donated over $3.1 million to 128 nonprofit organizations. Volunteerism also remained strong. Our employees donated their time to collaborate with many of the organizations we support financially. In December, as part of the celebration of the 35th anniversary of the Banco Popular Foundation in Puerto Rico, we inaugurated its new headquarters. In addition to serving as a home to our Foundation, the building houses 11 other nonprofit organizations, turning our space into a center for collaboration and social innovation.

Our stock closed the year at $34.05, 19% higher than at the end of 2013. This performance compares favorably to that of industry indices, our U.S. peers, and other banks in Puerto Rico.

In September of 2014, Ignacio Alvarez, Esq. was named President and Chief Operating Officer of Popular, Inc. and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, as well as President of Banco Popular North America. Ignacio had been serving as General Counsel since 2010, demonstrating outstanding leadership and making important contributions in strategic initiatives across the organization.

We are pleased to have brought on board Javier D. Ferrer, Esq. as the new General Counsel and Secretary of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. As one of the founding partners of Pietrantoni Méndez

& Alvarez LLC and a former president of

the Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico, Javier brings with him extensive experience in the corporate and banking law fields and has been a great addition to our team.

I want to express my deepest gratitude to Jorge A. Junquera for 43 years of outstanding service to Popular. From his early years in Investments, to his most recent role as Vice-Chairman, Jorge’s passion and dedication made him an integral part of the management team. It is impossible for me to enumerate the countless initiatives he led, but I would like to highlight that his advice, expertise and leadership during his 17 years as Chief Financial Officer were key to help strengthen the financial position of our organization.

Finally, I would also like to acknowledge Samuel T. Céspedes, Esq. who decided to retire after serving as the Secretary of the Board of Directors for 24 years. I know I speak on behalf of the entire Board when I say that we are all grateful for his commitment and his contributions throughout these years.

As you can see, our accomplishments for 2014 extend well beyond financial results. They demonstrate how commitment to our clients, employees, shareholders and communities translates into concrete results that pave the way for future successes.

I am grateful to the management team and Board of Directors for their support and leadership. They are responsible for all of these achievements.

The year 2015 brings a new set of opportunities and challenges. In the case of our U.S. operations, we will complete the transfer of the support functions to Puerto Rico and, at the same time, strive to achieve

FAST FACTS

2014 Highlights

$301 MILLION

in adjusted net income

$1.8 BILLION

adjusted gross revenues

$2 BILLION

amount by which our total capital exceeded the current well-capitalized threshold

aggressive business goals. In Puerto Rico, the economy still presents significant challenges, but we will remain focused on serving our clients and growing our business where opportunities exist.

I am confident that, guided by clear objectives and energized by the opportunities that lie ahead of us, we will continue forging ahead in 2015.

RICHARD L. CARRIÓN

Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

3


LOGO

 

25 YEAR

Historical Financial Summary

(Dollars in millions, except per share data) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Selected Financial Information

Net Income (Loss) $ 63.4 $ 64.6 $ 85.1 $ 109.4 $ 124.7 $ 146.4 $ 185.2 $ 209.6 $ 232.3 $ 257.6 $ 276.1

Assets 8,983.6 8,780.3 10,002.3 11,513.4 12,778.4 15,675.5 16,764.1 19,300.5 23,160.4 25,460.5 28,057.1

Gross Loans 5,373.3 5,195.6 5,252.1 6,346.9 7,781.3 8,677.5 9,779.0 11,376.6 13,078.8 14,907.8 16,057.1

Deposits 7,422.7 7,207.1 8,038.7 8,522.7 9,012.4 9,876.7 10,763.3 11,749.6 13,672.2 14,173.7 14,804.9

Stockholders’ Equity 588.9 631.8 752.1 834.2 1,002.4 1,141.7 1,262.5 1,503.1 1,709.1 1,661.0 1,993.6

Market Capitalization $ 479.1 $ 579.0 $ 987.8 $ 1,014.7 $ 923.7 $ 1,276.8 $ 2,230.5 $ 3,350.3 $ 4,611.7 $ 3,790.2 $ 3,578.1

Return on Assets (ROA) 1.09% 0.72% 0.89% 1.02% 1.02% 1.04% 1.14% 1.14% 1.14% 1.08% 1.04%

Return on Common Equity (ROE) 15.55% 10.57% 12.72% 13.80% 13.80% 14.22% 16.17% 15.83% 15.41% 15.45% 15.00%

Per Common Share1

Net Income (Loss) – Basic $ 3.94 $ 2.69 $ 3.49 $ 4.18 $ 4.59 $ 5.24 $ 6.69 $ 7.51 $ 8.26 $ 9.19 $ 9.85

Net Income (Loss) – Diluted 3.94 2.69 3.49 4.18 4.59 5.24 6.69 7.51 8.26 9.19 9.85

Dividends (Declared) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.25 1.54 1.83 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.20

Book Value 24.58 26.24 28.79 31.86 34.35 39.52 43.98 51.83 59.32 57.54 69.62

Market Price 20.00 24.06 37.81 39.38 35.16 48.44 84.38 123.75 170.00 139.69 131.56

Assets by Geographical Area

Puerto Rico 89% 87% 87% 79% 76% 75% 74% 74% 71% 71% 72%

United States 9% 11% 10% 16% 20% 21% 22% 23% 25% 25% 26%

Caribbean and Latin America 2% 2% 3% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 2%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Traditional Delivery System

Banking Branches

Puerto Rico 173 161 162 165 166 166 178 201 198 199 199

Virgin Islands 3 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

United States 24 24 30 32 34 40 44 63 89 91 95

Subtotal 200 188 195 205 208 214 230 272 295 298 302

Non-Banking Offices

Popular Financial Holdings 27 41 58 73 91 102 117 128 137 136

Popular Cash Express 51 102 132

Popular Finance 26 26 26 26 28 31 39 44 48 47 61

Popular Auto 9 9 9 8 10 9 8 10 10 12 12

Popular Leasing, U.S.A. 7 8 10 11

Popular Mortgage 3 3 3 11 13 21

Popular Securities 1 2 2 2 3

Popular One

Popular Insurance 2

Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A.

Popular Insurance, V.I.

E-LOAN

EVERTEC 4 4

Subtotal 35 62 76 92 111 134 153 183 258 327 382

Total 235 250 271 297 319 348 383 455 553 625 684

Electronic Delivery System

ATMs Owned

Puerto Rico 211 206 211 234 262 281 327 391 421 442 478

Virgin Islands 3 3 3 8 8 8 9 17 59 68 37

United States 6 11 26 38 53 71 94 99 109

Total 214 209 220 253 296 327 389 479 574 609 624

Transactions (in millions)

Electronic Transactions2 18.0 23.9 28.6 33.2 43.0 56.6 78.0 111.2 130.5 159.4 199.5

Items Processed3 164.0 166.1 170.4 171.8 174.5 175.0 173.7 171.9 170.9 171.0 160.2

Employees (full-time equivalent) 7,023 7,006 7,024 7,533 7,606 7,815 7,996 8,854 10,549 11,501 10,651

4


LOGO

 

POPULAR, INC. 2014 ANNUAL REPORT

1 Per common share data adjusted for stock splits and reverse stock split executed in May 2012.

2 From 1981 to 2003, electronic transactions include ACH, Direct Payment, TelePago Popular, Internet Banking and ATH Network transactions in Puerto Rico. From 2004 to 2009, these numbers were adjusted to include ATH Network transactions in the Dominican Republic, Costa Rica, El Salvador and the United States, health care transactions, wire transfers, and other electronic payment transactions in addition to those previously stated. After 2010, the summary only includes electronic transactions made by Popular, Inc.‘s clients and excludes electronic transactions processed by EVERTEC for other clients.

3 After the sale in 2010 of EVERTEC, Popular’s information technology subsidiary, the Corporation does not process electronic items.

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

$ 304.5 $ 351.9 $ 470.9 $ 489.9 $ 540.7 $ 357.7 $ (64.5) $ (1,243.9) $ (573.9) $ 137.4 $ 151.3 $ 245.3 $ 599.3 $ (313.5)

30,744.7 33,660.4 36,434.7 44,401.6 48,623.7 47,404.0 44,411.4 38,882.8 34,736.3 38,815.0 37,348.4 36,507.5 35,749.3 33,096.7

18,168.6 19,582.1 22,602.2 28,742.3 31,710.2 32,736.9 29,911.0 26,268.9 23,803.9 26,458.9 25,314.4 25,093.6 24,706.7 22,053.2

16,370.0 17,614.7 18,097.8 20,593.2 22,638.0 24,438.3 28,334.4 27,550.2 25,924.9 26,762.2 27,942.1 27,000.6 26,711.1 24,807.5

2,272.8 2,410.9 2,754.4 3,104.6 3,449.2 3,620.3 3,581.9 3,268.4 2,538.8 3,800.5 3,918.8 4,110.0 4,626.2 4,267.4

$ 3,965.4 $ 4,476.4 $ 5,960.2 $ 7,685.6 $ 5,836.5 $ 5,003.4 $ 2,968.3 $ 1,455.1 $ 1,445.4 $ 3,211.4 $ 1,426.0 $ 2,144.9 $ 2,970.6 $ 3,523.4

1.09% 1.11% 1.36% 1.23% 1.17% 0.74% -0.14% -3.04% -1.57% 0.36% 0.40% 0.68% 1.65% -0.89%

14.84% 16.29% 19.30% 17.60% 17.12% 9.73% -2.08% -44.47% -32.95% 4.37% 4.01% 6.37% 14.43% -7.04%

$ 10.87 $ 13.05 $ 17.36 $ 17.95 $ 19.78 $ 12.41 $ (2.73) $ (45.51) $ 2.39 $ (0.62) $ 1.44 $ 2.36 $ 5.80 $ (3.08)

10.87 13.05 17.36 17.92 19.74 12.41 (2.73) (45.51) 2.39 (0.62) 1.44 2.35 5.78 (3.08)

3.80 4.00 5.05 6.20 6.40 6.40 6.40 4.80 0.20 – – – – –

79.67 91.02 96.60 109.45 118.22 123.18 121.24 63.29 38.91 36.67 37.71 39.35 44.26 40.76

145.40 169.00 224.25 288.30 211.50 179.50 106.00 51.60 22.60 31.40 13.90 20.79 28.73 34.05

68% 66% 62% 55% 53% 52% 59% 64% 65% 74% 74% 73% 72% 80%

30% 32% 36% 43% 45% 45% 38% 33% 32% 23% 23% 24% 25% 17%

2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

196 195 193 192 194 191 196 179 173 185 183 175 171 168

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9

96 96 97 128 136 142 147 139 101 96 94 92 90 47

300 299 298 328 338 341 351 326 282 289 286 276 270 224

149 153 181 183 212 158 134 2

154 195 129 114 4

55 36 43 43 49 52 51 9

20 18 18 18 17 15 12 12 10 10 10 10 9 9

13 13 11 15 14 11 24 22

25 29 32 30 33 32 32 32 33 36 37 37 38 25

4 7 8 9 12 12 13 7 6 6 4 4 3 3

4 5 6 6

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

4 5 5 5 5 7 9 9 9

427 460 431 421 351 292 280 97 61 55 58 59 59 46

727 759 729 749 689 633 631 423 343 344 344 335 329 270

524 539 557 568 583 605 615 605 571 624 613 597 599 602

39 53 57 59 61 65 69 74 77 17 20 20 22 21

118 131 129 163 181 192 187 176 136 138 135 134 132 83

681 723 743 790 825 862 871 855 784 779 768 751 753 706

206.0 236.6 255.7 568.5 625.9 690.2 772.7 849.4 804.1 381.6 410.4 420.4 425.4 438.4

149.9 145.3 138.5 133.9 140.3 150.0 175.2 202.2 191.7

11,334 11,037 11,474 12,139 13,210 12,508 12,303 10,587 9,407 8,277 8,329 8,072 8,059 7,752

5


LOGO

 

POPULAR, INC.

Management

SENIOR MANAGEMENT TEAM

RICHARD L. CARRIÓN Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Popular, Inc.

IGNACIO ÁLVAREZ President & Chief Operational Officer Popular, Inc., Banco Popular de Puerto Rico & Popular Community Bank

CARLOS J. VÁZQUEZ Executive Vice President

& Chief Financial Officer Popular, Inc.

JAVIER D. FERRER

Executive Vice President & Chief Legal Officer General Counsel & Corporate Matters Group Popular, Inc.

ILEANA GONZÁLEZ Executive Vice President Commercial Credit Administration Group Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

JUAN O. GUERRERO Executive Vice President Financial & Insurance Group Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

GILBERTO MONZÓN Executive Vice President Individual Credit Group Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

EDUARDO J. NEGRÓN Executive Vice President Administration Group Popular, Inc.

NÉSTOR O. RIVERA Executive Vice President Retail Banking Group Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

ELI S. SEPÚLVEDA

Executive Vice President & Chief Lending Officer Commercial Credit Group Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

LIDIO SORIANO

Executive Vice President & Chief Risk Officer Corporate Risk Management Group Popular, Inc.

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

RICHARD L. CARRIÓN Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Popular, Inc.

JOAQUÍN E. BACARDÍ, III President & Chief Executive Officer Bacardí Corporation

ALEJANDRO M. BALLESTER President Ballester Hermanos, Inc.

JOHN W. DIERCKSEN Principal Greycrest, LLC

MARÍA LUISA FERRÉ President & Chief Executive Officer Grupo Ferré Rangel

DAVID E. GOEL

Managing General Partner Matrix Capital Management Company, LLC

C. KIM GOODWIN Private Investor

WILLIAM J. TEUBER JR. Vice Chairman EMC Corporation

CARLOS A. UNANUE President Goya de Puerto Rico

6


LOGO

 

POPULAR, INC. 2014 INFORME ANUAL

POPULAR, INC.

Resumen del Año

RICHARD L. CARRIÓN

Presidente de la Junta de Directores y Principal Oficial Ejecutivo

EL REPAGO DE LOS FONDOS TARP NOS COLOCA EN MEJOR POSICIÓN PARA UN MANEJO MÁS EFECTIVO DEL CAPITAL EN EL FUTURO.

En el 2014 alcanzamos logros significativos y progresamos en varios frentes.

El repago del TARP y la reestructuración de nuestras operaciones en los Estados Unidos fueron dos de los logros principales durante el año. Incluyendo el impacto de estos eventos, reportamos una pérdida neta de $313 millones. Aunque estas acciones afectaron nuestros resultados, nos encontramos ahora en una posición mucho más fuerte de cara al futuro. Al excluir estos eventos, el ingreso neto ajustado fue de $301 millones. Estos sólidos resultados fueron impulsados por un ingreso neto por intereses más alto, debido a un gasto menor en intereses, una reducción en la provisión para pérdidas en préstamos, gastos operacionales más bajos, principalmente en costos de pensión y seguro del FDIC, y contribuciones sobre ingresos más bajas.

La calidad de crédito se mantuvo estable a pesar de los retos que presenta la economía de Puerto Rico. Las pérdidas netas en préstamos se redujeron en Puerto Rico y los Estados Unidos en términos absolutos y como por ciento de préstamos. Del total de préstamos, cerramos el 2014 con 2.95% en préstamos no acumulativos, una cifra estable, si se excluyen los balances de las regiones vendidas como parte de la reestructuración en Estados Unidos. Nos mantenemos atentos, dadas las condiciones económicas en Puerto Rico, pero nos sentimos satisfechos con el desempeño general de nuestras carteras.

Continuamos disfrutando de niveles de capital sólidos con relación a nuestros pares y los requerimientos regulatorios. Nuestra relación de capital básico (“Tier 1 Common Equity”) se encontraba en 15.9% al final del año, o 110 puntos base más alto que el de 2013, que

todavía incluía nuestro capital de TARP. El repago de los fondos TARP, completado en julio de 2014 sin emitir capital adicional, nos coloca en mejor posición para un manejo de capital más activo en el futuro.

La reestructuración de nuestras operaciones en los Estados Unidos fue un evento clave en el 2014. En abril anunciamos nuestro plan de vender las regiones de California, Chicago y Florida Central para enfocar nuestro negocio en las regiones de Nueva York Metro y Miami. El plan también incluye la transferencia de la mayor parte de las funciones de apoyo a Puerto Rico y Nueva York para aprovechar el talento y la infraestructura que tenemos en nuestra sede y beneficiarnos de costos de personal más bajos en Puerto Rico. Durante el año, completamos la venta de las tres regiones y progresamos significativamente en la reestructuración operacional. Una vez se complete la transferencia de las operaciones de apoyo en la primera mitad de 2015, habremos reducido en 43% el número de empleados administrativos que proveen apoyo a nuestra operación en los Estados Unidos, con aproximadamente dos terceras partes de ellos con base en Puerto Rico. Quiero reconocer el trabajo arduo de todos nuestros compañeros en Popular Community Bank y los que apoyaron desde Puerto Rico, haciendo posible la ejecución exitosa de un proceso de reestructuración extremadamente complejo. Ahora estamos listos para seguir adelante con una operación en los Estados Unidos más eficiente y enfocada.

Nuestra franquicia en Puerto Rico se fortaleció en el 2014. Aumentó nuestra participación de mercado en muchas categorías y mantuvimos nuestro liderato en la mayoría de ellas. En el negocio de autos, en el cual intensificamos

7


LOGO

 

POPULAR, INC.

Resumen del Año

LA FUNDACIÓN BANCO POPULAR Y POPULAR COMMUNITY BANK FOUNDATION DONARON MÁS DE $3.1 MILLONES A 128 ORGANIZACIONES SIN FINES DE LUCRO.

nuestros esfuerzos de ventas, alcanzamos por primera vez la segunda posición en el mercado. A pesar de la debilidad económica en Puerto Rico, también experimentamos crecimiento en el segmento corporativo. Intensificamos nuestros esfuerzos por mejorar el servicio y ofrecer mayor conveniencia a nuestros clientes. La mayor parte de las unidades de negocio mejoraron sus métricas de satisfacción al cliente. Los resultados reflejan el esfuerzo consciente de todos los grupos, así como iniciativas relacionadas a la eficiencia que han tenido, además, un impacto positivo en la satisfacción de nuestros clientes. El rediseño de procesos en sucursales, basado en la metodología LEAN, se completó en 17% de nuestras sucursales que representan un 28% del total de transacciones. Los resultados hasta el momento reflejan una mejora en los niveles de servicio y reducciones significativas en el tiempo de espera. A medida que vayamos extendiendo el proyecto a otras sucursales, anticipamos mejoras adicionales en la satisfacción de nuestros clientes.

También continuamos la implementación de proyectos diseñados para transformar nuestra red de distribución, poniendo mayor énfasis en las transacciones digitales.

La digitalización de las interacciones de nuestros clientes es vital para ofrecer alternativas convenientes y generar eficiencias en costos. Durante el mes de diciembre del 2014, los depósitos realizados en cajeros automáticos en Puerto Rico alcanzaron el 29% de los depósitos en sucursales con cajeros avanzados, comparado con un 17% para la misma fecha en el 2013. Al mismo tiempo que migramos transacciones, servicios y ventas a canales digitales, revisaremos nuestra red de locales físicos para satisfacer de una forma más efectiva las necesidades de nuestros clientes. Además, emprendimos iniciativas claves relacionadas a nuestro activo más importante – nuestra gente. En agosto, aumentamos a $9.00 el salario base mínimo por hora para nuestros empleados en Puerto Rico, beneficiando aproximadamente 2,400 compañeros. En el 2015, lo aumentaremos a $10.00 para aquellos empleados con buen desempeño. Estamos conscientes que es crítico, atraer, retener y desarrollar el mejor talento disponible, para así poder alcanzar nuestras ambiciosas

metas. Estamos convencidos que esta inversión será beneficiosa en términos de retención, compromiso, servicio al cliente y productividad.

Otro suceso importante este año fue la inauguración del Centro Interno de Salud y Bienestar en Puerto Rico, enfocado en la prevención y detección temprana de condiciones de salud. El objetivo de este enfoque innovador es mejorar la salud de nuestros empleados, que se traducirá en gastos médicos menores y en un aumento en productividad. Como resultado de estos y otros esfuerzos, la métrica del compromiso de nuestros empleados, que ya de por sí era alta, mejoró aún más en 2014. Continuamente estamos elevando las expectativas, esperando un nivel más alto en el desempeño de nuestros empleados. Estamos confiados que este enfoque, sumado a las inversiones que estamos haciendo en nuestra gente, los convierten en nuestra mayor ventaja competitiva.

Nuestro compromiso con nuestras comunidades continuó firme. Expandimos nuestro programa de educación financiera,

CAMBIO EN PRECIO DE LA ACCIÓN COMPARADO CON LOS PARES (2013-2014)

30%

20%

19% BPOP

10% 8% Pares EE.UU.

7% Índice KBW

0% -10% -20%

-30% Pares PR

-32%

-40%

13—14 — 14—14 14—14 — 14 14—14 — 14—14 14 — 14 DEC ENE FEB MAR ABR MAY JUN JUL AGO SEPT OCT NOV DEC

8


LOGO

 

POPULAR, INC. 2014 INFORME ANUAL

Finanzas en tus Manos, que ha llegado a más de 100,000 personas en Puerto Rico y fue reconocido por la American Banking Association como el mejor programa de educación financiera en los Estados Unidos. Continuamos comprometidos con Echar Pa’lante, un programa social de colaboración multisectorial que lanzamos en 2011, enlazando a más de 300 organizaciones y expertos para fomentar la educación y el empresarismo. La aportación de los empleados a nuestras fundaciones aumentó en 2014, alcanzando $730,000. En gran medida gracias a esta contribución, la Fundación Banco Popular y Popular Community Bank Foundation donaron más de $3.1 millones a 128 organizaciones sin fines de lucro. El voluntariado también se mantuvo sólido. Nuestros empleados donaron su tiempo para colaborar con muchas organizaciones que apoyamos ?nancieramente. En diciembre, como parte de la celebración del 35to aniversario de la Fundación Banco Popular en Puerto Rico, inauguramos su nueva sede. Además de servir como base para nuestra Fundación, el edi?cio alberga otras 11 organizaciones sin ?nes de lucro, convirtiendo así nuestro espacio en un centro de colaboración e innovación social.

Nuestra acción cerró el año en $34.05, 19% más alto que al ?nal de 2013. Este desempeño compara favorablemente con índices de la industria, nuestros pares en los Estados Unidos y otros bancos en Puerto Rico. En septiembre de 2014, el Lcdo. Ignacio Álvarez fue nombrado Presidente y Principal O?cial de Operaciones de Popular, Inc. y Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, así como Presidente de Banco Popular North America. Ignacio se desempeñaba como Principal O?cial Legal desde 2010, demostrando gran liderazgo y realizando aportaciones importantes a iniciativas estratégicas a través de la organización.

Nos complace la llegada del Lcdo. Javier D. Ferrer como el nuevo Principal O?cial Legal y Secretario de la Junta de Directores de Popular, Inc. Como uno de los socios fundadores de la ?rma de abogados Pietrantoni Méndez & Alvarez LLC y pasado presidente del Banco Gubernamental de Fomento para Puerto Rico, Javier trae consigo una vasta experiencia en el campo de ley corporativa y bancaria y ha sido un gran complemento a nuestro equipo.

Quiero expresar mi más profunda gratitud a Jorge A. Junquera por sus 43 años de servicio excepcional a Popular. Desde sus primeros años en Inversiones, hasta su función más reciente como Vicepresidente de la Junta de Directores, la pasión y dedicación de Jorge lo hizo una parte integral de nuestro equipo gerencial. Es imposible enumerar las múltiples iniciativas que dirigió, pero me gustaría resaltar que su asesoramiento, experiencia y liderazgo en sus 17 años como Principal O?cial Financiero fueron clave para ayudar a fortalecer la posición ?nanciera de nuestra organización.

Finalmente, quiero reconocer al Lcdo. Samuel T. Céspedes, quien decidió retirarse luego de servir como Secretario de la Junta de Directores durante 24 años. Sé que hablo en representación de toda la Junta cuando digo que estamos muy agradecidos de su compromiso y su contribución todos estos años.

Como pueden ver, nuestros logros en el 2014 se extienden más allá de los resultados ?nancieros. Demuestran como el compromiso con nuestros clientes, empleados, accionistas y comunidades se traduce en resultados concretos que preparan el camino para éxitos futuros.

Le agradezco a nuestro equipo gerencial y a la Junta de Directores, quienes son responsables de estos logros, por su apoyo y liderazgo.

CIFRAS A LA MANO

Puntos Principales de 2014

$301 MILLONES

en ingreso neto ajustado

$1,800 MILLONES

en ingreso bruto ajustado

$2,000 MILLONES

cantidad por la cual el capital total excedió el mínimo requerido para ser considerado bien capitalizado.

El 2015 trae consigo nuevas oportunidades y desafíos. En términos de nuestras operaciones en los Estados Unidos, completaremos la transferencia de las funciones de apoyo a Puerto Rico y, a la vez, nos esforzaremos por lograr metas ambiciosas de negocio. En Puerto Rico, la economía todavía representa retos signi?cativos, pero permaneceremos enfocados en servir a nuestros clientes y hacer crecer nuestro negocio donde existan oportunidades.

Confío que, guiados por objetivos claros y motivados por las oportunidades que vemos en el futuro, continuaremos avanzando con determinación en el 2015.

RICHARD L. CARRIÓN

Presidente de la Junta de Directores y Principal O?cial Ejecutivo


LOGO

 

25 AÑOS

Resumen Financiero Histórico

(Dólares en millones, excepto información por acción) 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000

Información Financiera Seleccionada

Ingreso neto (Pérdida Neta) $ 63.4 $ 64.6 $ 85.1 $ 109.4 $ 124.7 $ 146.4 $ 185.2 $ 209.6 $ 232.3 $ 257.6 $ 276.1

Activos 8,983.6 8,780.3 10,002.3 11,513.4 12,778.4 15,675.5 16,764.1 19,300.5 23,160.4 25,460.5 28,057.1

Préstamos Brutos 5,373.3 5,195.6 5,252.1 6,346.9 7,781.3 8,677.5 9,779.0 11,376.6 13,078.8 14,907.8 16,057.1

Depósitos 7,422.7 7,207.1 8,038.7 8,522.7 9,012.4 9,876.7 10,763.3 11,749.6 13,672.2 14,173.7 14,804.9

Capital de Accionistas 588.9 631.8 752.1 834.2 1,002.4 1,141.7 1,262.5 1,503.1 1,709.1 1,661.0 1,993.6

Valor agregado en el mercado $ 479.1 $ 579.0 $ 987.8 $ 1,014.7 $ 923.7 $ 1,276.8 $ 2,230.5 $ 3,350.3 $ 4,611.7 $ 3,790.2 $ 3,578.1

Rendimiento de Activos (ROA) 1.09% 0.72% 0.89% 1.02% 1.02% 1.04% 1.14% 1.14% 1.14% 1.08% 1.04%

Rendimiento de Capital Común (ROE) 15.55% 10.57% 12.72% 13.80% 13.80% 14.22% 16.17% 15.83% 15.41% 15.45% 15.00%

Por Acción Común1

Ingreso neto (Pérdida Neta)—Básico $ 3.94 $ 2.69 $ 3.49 $ 4.18 $ 4.59 $ 5.24 $ 6.69 $ 7.51 $ 8.26 $ 9.19 $ 9.85

Ingreso neto (Pérdida Neta)—Diluido 3.94 2.69 3.49 4.18 4.59 5.24 6.69 7.51 8.26 9.19 9.85

Dividendos (Declarados) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.20 1.25 1.54 1.83 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.20

Valor en los Libros 24.58 26.24 28.79 31.86 34.35 39.52 43.98 51.83 59.32 57.54 69.62

Precio en el Mercado 20.00 24.06 37.81 39.38 35.16 48.44 84.38 123.75 170.00 139.69 131.56

Activos por Área Geográfica

Puerto Rico 89% 87% 87% 79% 76% 75% 74% 74% 71% 71% 72%

Estados Unidos 9% 11% 10% 16% 20% 21% 22% 23% 25% 25% 26%

Caribe y Latinoamérica 2% 2% 3% 5% 4% 4% 4% 3% 4% 4% 2%

Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Sistema de Distribución Tradicional

Sucursales Bancarias

Puerto Rico 173 161 162 165 166 166 178 201 198 199 199

Islas Vírgenes 3 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Estados Unidos 24 24 30 32 34 40 44 63 89 91 95

Subtotal 200 188 195 205 208 214 230 272 295 298 302

Oficinas No Bancarias

Popular Financial Holdings 27 41 58 73 91 102 117 128 137 136

Popular Cash Express 51 102 132

Popular Finance 26 26 26 26 28 31 39 44 48 47 61

Popular Auto 9 9 9 8 10 9 8 10 10 12 12

Popular Leasing, U.S.A. 7 8 10 11

Popular Mortgage 3 3 3 11 13 21

Popular Securities 1 2 2 2 3

Popular One

Popular Insurance 2

Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A.

Popular Insurance, V.I.

E-LOAN

EVERTEC 4 4

Subtotal 35 62 76 92 111 134 153 183 258 327 382

Total 235 250 271 297 319 348 383 455 553 625 684

Sistema Electrónico de Distribución

Cajeros Automáticos

Propios y Administrados

Puerto Rico 211 206 211 234 262 281 327 391 421 442 478

Islas Virgenes 3 3 3 8 8 8 9 17 59 68 37

Estados Unidos 6 11 26 38 53 71 94 99 109

Total 214 209 220 253 296 327 389 479 574 609 624

Transacciones (en millones)

Transacciones Electrónicas2 18.0 23.9 28.6 33.2 43.0 56.6 78.0 111.2 130.5 159.4 199.5

Efectos Procesados3 164.0 166.1 170.4 171.8 174.5 175.0 173.7 171.9 170.9 171.0 160.2

Empleados (equivalente a tiempo completo) 7,023 7,006 7,024 7,533 7,606 7,815 7,996 8,854 10,549 11,501 10,651

10


LOGO

 

POPULAR, INC. 2014 INFORME ANUAL

1 Los datos de las acciones comunes han sido ajustados por las divisiones en acciones y la división de acciones a la inversa realizada en mayo de 2012.

2 Desde el 1981 hasta el 2003, las transacciones electrónicas incluyen transacciones ACH, Pago Directo, TelePago Popular, Banca por Internet y transacciones por la Red ATH en Puerto Rico. Desde el 2004 hasta el 2009, estos números incluyen el total de transacciones por la Red ATH en República Dominicana, Costa Rica, El Salvador y Estados Unidos, transacciones de facturación médica, transferencias cablegráficas y otros pagos electrónicos además de lo previamente señalado. A partir del 2010, esta cifra incluye solamente las transacciones realizadas por los clientes de Popular, Inc. y excluye las transacciones procesadas por EVERTEC para otros clientes.

3 A partir del 2010, luego de la venta de EVERTEC, la subsidiaria de tecnología de Popular, Inc., no se procesan efectos electrónicos.

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

$ 304.5 $ 351.9 $ 470.9 $ 489.9 $ ?540.7 $ ?357.7 $ ?(64.5) $ (1,243.9) $ ?(573.9) $ 137.4 $ 151.3 $ 245.3 $ 599.3 $ (313.5)

30,744.7 33,660.4 36,434.7 44,401.6 48,623.7 47,404.0 44,411.4 38,882.8 34,736.3 38,815.0 37,348.4 36,507.5 35,749.3 33,096.7

18,168.6 19,582.1 22,602.2 28,742.3 31,710.2 32,736.9 29,911.0 26,268.9 23,803.9 26,458.9 25,314.4 25,093.6 24,706.7 22,053.2

16,370.0 17,614.7 18,097.8 20,593.2 22,638.0 24,438.3 28,334.4 27,550.2 25,924.9 26,762.2 27,942.1 27,000.6 26,711.1 24,807.5

2,272.8 2,410.9 2,754.4 3,104.6 3,449.2 3,620.3 3,581.9 3,268.4 2,538.8 3,800.5 3,918.8 4,110.0 4,626.2 4,267.4

$ 3,965.4 $ 4,476.4 $ 5,960.2 $ 7,685.6 $ 5,836.5 $ 5,003.4 $ 2,968.3 $ 1,455.1 $ 1,445.4 $ 3,211.4 $ 1,426.0 $ 2,144.9 $ 2,970.6 $ 3,523.4

1.09% 1.11% 1.36% 1.23% 1.17% 0.74% -0.14% -3.04% -1.57% 0.36% 0.40% 0.68% 1.65% -0.89%

14.84% 16.29% 19.30% 17.60% 17.12% 9.73% -2.08% -44.47% -32.95% 4.37% 4.01% 6.37% 14.43% -7.04%

$ 10.87 $ 13.05 $ 17.36 $ 17.95 $ 19.78 $ 12.41 $ (2.73) $ (45.51) $ 2.39 $ (0.62) $ 1.44 $ 2.36 $ 5.80 $ (3.08)

10.87 13.05 17.36 17.92 19.74 12.41 (2.73) (45.51) 2.39 (0.62) 1.44 2.35 5.78 (3.08)

3.80 4.00 5.05 6.20 6.40 6.40 6.40 4.80 0.20 – – – – –

79.67 91.02 96.60 109.45 118.22 123.18 121.24 63.29 38.91 36.67 37.71 39.35 44.26 40.76

145.40 169.00 224.25 288.30 211.50 179.50 106.00 51.60 22.60 31.40 13.90 20.79 28.73 34.05

68% 66% 62% 55% 53% 52% 59% 64% 65% 74% 74% 73% 72% 80%

30% 32% 36% 43% 45% 45% 38% 33% 32% 23% 23% 24% 25% 17%

2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3% 3%

100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

196 195 193 192 194 191 196 179 173 185 183 175 171 168

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 9 9 9 9

96 96 97 128 136 142 147 139 101 96 94 92 90 47

300 299 298 328 338 341 351 326 282 289 286 276 270 224

149 153 181 183 212 158 134 2

154 195 129 114 4

55 36 43 43 49 52 51 9

20 18 18 18 17 15 12 12 10 10 10 10 9 9

13 13 11 15 14 11 24 22

25 29 32 30 33 32 32 32 33 36 37 37 38 25

4 7 8 9 12 12 13 7 6 6 4 4 3 3

4 5 6 6

2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1

4 5 5 5 5 7 9 9 9

427 460 431 421 351 292 280 97 61 55 58 59 59 46

727 759 729 749 689 633 631 423 343 344 344 335 329 270

524 539 557 568 583 605 615 605 571 624 613 597 599 602

39 53 57 59 61 65 69 74 77 17 20 20 22 21

118 131 129 163 181 192 187 176 136 138 135 134 132 83

681 723 743 790 825 862 871 855 784 779 768 751 753 706

206.0 236.6 255.7 568.5 625.9 690.2 772.7 849.4 804.1 381.6 410.4 420.4 425.4 438.4

149.9 145.3 138.5 133.9 140.3 150.0 175.2 202.2 191.7

11,334 11,037 11,474 12,139 13,210 12,508 12,303 10,587 9,407 8,277 8,329 8,072 8,059 7,752

11


LOGO

 

POPULAR, INC.

Gerencia

EQUIPO GERENCIAL EJECUTIVO

RICHARD L. CARRIÓN Presidente de la Junta de Directores y Principal O?cial Ejecutivo Popular, Inc.

IGNACIO ÁLVAREZ

Presidente y Principal O?cial de Operaciones Popular, Inc., Banco Popular de Puerto Rico y Popular Community Bank

CARLOS J. VÁZQUEZ Vicepresidente Ejecutivo y Principal O?cial Financiero Popular, Inc.

JAVIER D. FERRER

Vicepresidente Ejecutivo y Principal O?cial Legal Grupo de Consejería General y Asuntos Corporativos Popular, Inc.

ILEANA GONZÁLEZ Vicepresidenta Ejecutiva Grupo de Administración de Crédito Comercial Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

JUAN O. GUERRERO Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo de Servicios Financieros y Seguros Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

GILBERTO MONZÓN Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo de Crédito a Individuo Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

EDUARDO J. NEGRÓN Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo de Administración Popular, Inc.

NÉSTOR O. RIVERA Vicepresidente Ejecutivo Grupo de Banca Individual Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

ELI S. SEPÚLVEDA Vicepresidente Ejecutivo y Principal O?cial de Préstamos Grupo de Crédito Comercial Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

LIDIO SORIANO

Vicepresidente Ejecutivo y Principal O?cial de Riesgo Grupo Corporativo de Manejo de Riesgo Popular, Inc.

12


Financial Review and

Supplementary Information

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  63   

Statistical Summaries

  169   

Financial Statements

Management’s Report to Stockholders

  174   

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

  175   

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2014 and 2013

  177   

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

  178   

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

  179   

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

  180   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012

  181   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

  182   

 

62


Management’s Discussion and

Analysis of Financial Condition

and Results of Operations

 

Forward-Looking Statements   64   

Overview

  65   

Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates

  72   

Statement of Operations Analysis

  87   

Net Interest Income

  87   

Provision for Loan Losses

  92   

Non-Interest Income

  94   

Operating Expenses

  96   

Income Taxes

  97   

Fourth Quarter Results

  99   

Reportable Segment Results

  100   

Statement of Financial Condition Analysis

  104   

Assets

  104   

Deposits and Borrowings

  109   

Stockholders’ Equity

  110   

Regulatory Capital

  111   

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Other Commitments

  116   

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

  116   

Guarantees

  117   

Risk Management

  120   

Market / Interest Rate Risk

  122   

Liquidity

  129   

Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality

  135   

Enterprise Risk and Operational Risk Management

  164   

Adoption of New Accounting Standards and Issued But Not Yet Effective Accounting Standards

  165   

Statistical Summaries

Statements of Financial Condition

  169   

Statements of Operations

  170   

Average Balance Sheet and Summary of Net Interest Income

  171   

Quarterly Financial Data

  173   

 

63


The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) provides information which management believes is necessary for understanding the financial performance of Popular, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation” or “Popular”). All accompanying tables, consolidated financial statements, and corresponding notes included in this “Financial Review and Supplementary Information - 2014 Annual Report” (“the report”) should be considered an integral part of this MD&A.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information included in this report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements may relate to the Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business, including, but not limited to, statements with respect to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, delinquency trends, market risk and the impact of interest rate changes, capital market conditions, capital adequacy and liquidity, the anticipated impacts of our acquisition of certain assets and deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) as receiver, including transaction expenses and our expectation that the transaction will be accretive and the effect of legal proceedings and new accounting standards on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations. All statements contained herein that are not clearly historical in nature are forward-looking, and the words “anticipate”, “believe”, “continues”, “expect”, “estimate”, “intend”, “project” and similar expressions and future or conditional verbs such as “will”, “would”, “should”, “could”, “might”, “can”, “may” or similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, are based on management’s current expectations and, by their nature, involve certain risks, uncertainties, estimates and assumptions by management that are difficult to predict. Various factors, some of which are beyond the Corporation’s control, could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and economic conditions; changes in interest rates, as well as the magnitude of such changes; the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies; changes in federal bank regulatory and supervisory policies, including required levels of capital and the impact of proposed capital standards on our capital ratios; the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Financial Reform Act) on the Corporation’s businesses, business practices and costs of operations; the relative strength or weakness of the consumer and commercial credit sectors and of the real estate markets in Puerto Rico and the other markets in which borrowers are located; the performance of the stock and bond markets; competition in the financial services industry; additional FDIC assessments; and possible legislative, tax or regulatory changes. Other possible events or factors that could cause results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements include the following: negative economic conditions that adversely affect the housing prices, the job market, consumer confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other things, the level of non-performing assets, charge-offs and provision expense; risks associated with maintaining customer relationships from our acquisition of certain assets and deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver, including managing any potential customer confusion caused by the alliance structure; changes in interest rates and market liquidity which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect our ability to originate and distribute financial products in the primary and secondary markets; changes in market rates and prices which may adversely impact the value of financial assets and liabilities; difficulties in converting or integrating the Doral branches or difficulties in providing transition support to alliance co-bidders; liabilities resulting from litigation and regulatory investigations; changes in accounting standards, rules and interpretations; our ability to grow our core businesses; decisions to downsize, sell or close units or otherwise change our business mix; and management’s ability to identify and manage these and other risks. Moreover, the outcome of legal proceedings, as discussed in “Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings”, is inherently uncertain and depends on judicial interpretations of law and the findings of regulators, judges and juries.

All forward-looking statements included in this report are based upon information available to the Corporation as of the date of this report, and other than as required by law, including the requirements of applicable securities laws, management assumes no obligation to update or revise any such forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

The description of the Corporation’s business and risk factors contained in Item 1 and 1A of its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 discusses additional information about the business of the Corporation and the material risk factors that, in addition to the other information in this report, readers should consider.

 

64


OVERVIEW

The Corporation is a diversified, publicly-owned financial holding company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States (“U.S.”) mainland, and the U.S. and British Virgin Islands. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides retail, including residential mortgage loans originations, and commercial banking services through its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), as well as investment banking, broker-dealer, auto and equipment leasing and financing, and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. Effective December 31, 2012, Popular Mortgage, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of BPPR prior to that date, was merged with and into BPPR as part of an internal reorganization. The Corporation’s mortgage origination business continues to be conducted under the brand name Popular Mortgage, a division of BPPR. In the U.S. mainland, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. The BPNA franchise operates under the brand name of Popular Community Bank. BPNA focuses efforts and resources on the core community banking business. BPNA operates branches in New York, New Jersey and Southern Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. Note 41 to the consolidated financial statements presents information about the Corporation’s business segments.

The Corporation has several investments which accounts for under the equity method. These include the 14.96% interest in EVERTEC, a 15.82% interest in Centro Financiero BHD Leon, S.A. (“BHD Leon”), a 24.9% interest in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC and a 24.9% interest in PRLP 2011 Holdings LLP, among other investments in limited partnerships which mainly hold investment securities. EVERTEC provides transaction processing services throughout the Caribbean and Latin America, including servicing many of the Corporation’s systems infrastructure and transaction processing businesses. Centro Financiero BHD is a diversified financial services institution operating in the Dominican Republic. PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is a joint venture to which the Corporation sold construction and commercial loans and commercial and residential real estate owned assets, most of which were non-performing, with a fair value of $306 million during the year 2013. PRLP 2011 Holdings LLP is a joint venture to which the Corporation sold construction and commercial loans, most of which were non-performing, with a fair value of $148 million during the year 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation recorded approximately $38.2 million in earnings from these investments on an aggregate basis. The carrying amounts of these investments as of December 31, 2014 were $188.1 million. Refer to Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information of the Corporation’s investments at equity.

Significant events

Acquisition of certain assets and deposits of Doral Bank from the FDIC as receiver

On February 27, 2015, the Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), in an alliance with co-bidders, including the Corporation’s U.S. mainland banking subsidiary, Banco Popular North America, doing business as Popular Community Bank (“PCB”), had acquired certain assets and all deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver.

Under the FDIC’s bidding format, BPPR was the lead bidder and party to the purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC covering all assets and deposits to be acquired by it and its alliance co-bidders. BPPR entered into back to back purchase and assumption agreements with the alliance co-bidders for the transferred assets and deposits.

After taking into account the transfers to the unaffiliated alliance co-bidders, BPPR and PCB together assumed approximately $2.3 billion in deposits and acquired approximately $1.8 billion in performing commercial and residential loans, including:

 

   

BPPR assumed approximately $612 million in deposits associated with eight of the 18 Puerto Rico branches of Doral Bank and approximately $431 million from its online deposit platform, and approximately $848 million in performing Puerto Rico residential and commercial loans. BPPR purchased the loans at an aggregate discount of 4.71% or $40 million and paid an aggregate premium of 0.93% or $10 million for the deposits it assumed.

 

   

PCB assumed approximately $1.3 billion in deposits in three New York branches of Doral Bank, and acquired approximately $931 million in performing commercial loans primarily in the New York metropolitan area. PCB purchased the loans at an aggregate premium of 0.57% or $5 million and paid an aggregate premium of 1.99% or $25 million for the deposits it assumed.

In addition, on February 27, 2015, the FDIC, as Receiver for Doral Bank, awarded BPPR the mortgage servicing rights for a loan portfolio of approximately $5 billion in unpaid principal balance, for a purchase price currently estimated at $48.6 million. The transfers of the mortgage servicing rights are subject to a number of specified closing conditions, including the consent of each of Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a form acceptable to BPPR, and other customary closing conditions. The transfers are expected to close within the next 60 days, subject to the conditions described above.

There is no loss-sharing arrangement with the FDIC on the acquired assets.

Management believes that this transaction allows the Corporation to effectively deploy excess capital by acquiring banking operations that complement its main market in Puerto Rico and further support the recent reorganization and focus of its US mainland operations in the New York and South Florida markets. The transaction will reduce regulatory capital ratios by approximately 1.5%, excluding the impact of goodwill. The Corporation would continue to reflect excess capital over well capitalized targets in excess of approximately $1.7 billion. The Company expects to record goodwill based on the pricing for the acquired loans at a discount and deposits at a premium of 1.9% and 1.5%, respectively. The transaction is expected to be accretive to earnings in the first twelve months, including transaction costs estimated between $20 to $25 million. Please revise “Forward-Looking Statements” factors to include these statements as forward-looking statements. Furthermore, the incremental earnings expected to be generated from the US based operations would be considered additional positive evidence in our analysis that could result in the realization of a portion of the fully reserved deferred tax asset recorded at PCB.

The transaction was completed based on December 31, 2014 balances and is subject to customary true-up and purchase accounting adjustments through the date of the close. The $1.8 billion in loans and $2.3 billion in deposits acquired by Popular in the transaction did not include any non-performing assets and do not enjoy a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC.

Repayment of TARP funds

On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury through the repurchase of $935 million of trust capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Corporation funded the repurchase through a combination of available cash and approximately $400 million from the proceeds of the issuance of its $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019 which settled on July 1, 2014.

On July 23, 2014, the Corporation also completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant initially issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in 2008 for a repurchase price of $3.0 million. The warrant represented the right to purchase 2,093,284 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $67 per share with an original term of 10 years. With the completion of this transaction, the Corporation completed its exit from the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

Reorganization of the U.S operations

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of its California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations to three different buyers as part of an internal reorganization. The Corporation recorded a net gain of approximately $33.8 million, after customary transaction costs, as a result of these transactions. In connection with these transactions, the Corporation is relocating certain back office operations to Puerto Rico and New York. After the reorganization is complete, annual operating expenses are expected to decrease by approximately $34 million. This decrease in expenses is expected to offset a similar reduction in revenues that will result from the sale of the regional operations. The Corporation recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $186.5 million, related to the goodwill asset allocated to these regions. This non-cash charge had no impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios. The Corporation also executed other transactions as part of the reorganization of its U.S. operations. These included the refinancing of $638 million in structured repos, which resulted in increased margins, at a cost of approximately $39.8 million recognized during 2014. Also, the Corporation completed bulk sales or agreements to sell of non-performing and legacy assets with an aggregate book value of approximately $249 million, at a net loss of $11.1 million.

Current and prior period’s financial information covering income and expense amounts presented in this MD&A has been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. The financial information for prior periods included in this MD&A does not reflect the reclassification of assets and liabilities to discontinued operations.

 

65


Adjusted results of operations – Non-GAAP financial measure

The Corporation prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements using accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”), the (“reported basis”). These financial statements appear on pages 177 to 181. In addition to analyzing the Corporation’s results on a reported basis, management monitors the performance of the Corporation on an “adjusted basis” and excludes the impact of certain unusual transactions on the results of its operations. Throughout this MD&A, the Corporation presents a discussion of its financial results excluding the impact of these events to arrive at the “adjusted results”. Management believes that the “adjusted results” provide meaningful information about the underlying performance of the Corporation’s ongoing operations. The “adjusted results” are a Non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Tables 72-74, for a reconciliation of the reported results to the “adjusted results” for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Non-GAAP financial measures used by the Corporation may not be comparable to similarly named non-GAAP financial measures used by other companies.

Adjustment to our reserve for loans sold with credit recourse

Our net loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 reported in this annual report is different from what we reported in our earnings release issued on January 23, 2014. The difference is related to an adjustment recorded to increase our reserve for loans sold with credit recourse by approximately $6.5 million. The impact of the adjustment after the applicable income tax is to increase our net loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 by approximately $4.0 million. The impact on our total basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the year ended December 31, 2014 was an increase in the net loss of $.03 per share. The impact on our total basic and diluted earnings per share for the quarter ended December 31, 2014 was a reduction in the net income of $0.03 and $0.04 per share, respectively.

Financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2014

The Corporation’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2014 amounted to $313.5 million, compared to a net income $599.3 million and $245.3 million, for 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $190.5 million, compared to a net income of $558.9 million and $207.5 million, for 2013 and 2012, respectively. The continuing operations for the year 2014 reflect a $414.1 million expense related to the amortization of the discount associated with the TARP funds which were repaid during 2014; a positive adjustment of $12.5 million in the amortization of the FDIC indemnification asset to reverse the impact of accelerated amortization expense recorded in prior periods; and the impact of the BPNA reorganization which included losses on bulk sales of non-performing assets totalling $11.1 million, a $39.7 million expense related to the refinancing of structured repos and restructuring charges of $26.7 million. In addition, during 2014 the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $20.0 million related to the change in the capital gains tax rate from 15% to 20% and a $8.0 million charge to record a valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset at the holding company, offset by an income tax benefit of $23.4 million resulting from the Closing Agreement with the PR Treasury Department related to the treatment of certain charge-offs for the loans acquired from Westernbank.

The results for 2013 reflect the impact of two bulk sale of non-performing assets resulting in an aggregate after tax loss of $287.7 million, $412.8 million in after tax gains resulting from the initial and subsequent public offerings and related transactions completed by EVERTEC in which the Corporation participated as a selling stockholder and an income tax benefit of $197.5 million reflecting the impact on the deferred tax asset related to the change in the corporate tax rate from 30% to 39%. The results for 2012 reflect an income tax benefit of $72.9 million related to reduction of the deferred tax liability on the estimated gains for tax purposes related to the loans acquired from Westernbank as a result of the closing agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury, which established that these would be taxed at a capital gain rate. Also, the results from 2012 reflect a benefit of approximately $26.9 million from the Corporation’s share of a tax benefit from a grant received by EVERTEC from the Puerto Rico Government.

Excluding the impact of the above mentioned transactions, the adjusted net income from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $300.7 million, compared to $215.7 million for 2013, while the net income was $343.6 million and $256.2 million for 2014 and 2013, respectively. Refer to Table 72-74 for the reconciliation to the adjusted, Non-GAAP net income.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, net loss from discontinued operations was $123.0 million, compared to a net income of $40.9 million and $37.8 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively. The results for 2014 include a goodwill impairment charge of $186.5 million and the net gain on the sale of the U.S. regional operations amounting to $33.8 million.

Table 1 provides selected financial data for the past five years. For purposes of the discussions, assets subject to loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, including loans and other real estate owned, are referred to as “covered assets” or “covered loans” since the Corporation expects to be reimbursed for 80% of any future losses on those assets, subject to the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreements.

 

66


Table 1 - Selected Financial Data

 

    Years ended December 31,  

(Dollars in thousands, except per common share data)

  2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

         

Interest income

  $ 1,633,543      $ 1,647,940      $ 1,644,386      $ 1,806,408      $ 1,789,836  

Interest expense

    688,471       303,366       362,759       484,860       622,246  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

  945,072     1,344,574     1,281,627     1,321,548     1,167,590  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses:

Non-covered loans

  223,999     536,710     322,234     395,853     911,564  

Covered loans

  46,135     69,396     74,839     145,635     —    

Non-interest income

  386,515     791,013     511,489     603,842     1,279,407  

Operating expenses

  1,193,684     1,221,990     1,214,989     1,143,860     1,261,226  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  58,279     (251,327   (26,403   114,927     108,230  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations

  (190,510   558,818     207,457     125,115     165,977  

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax

  (122,980   40,509     37,818     26,210     (28,576
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

$ (313,490 $ 599,327    $ 245,275    $ 151,325    $ 137,401  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income applicable to common stock

$ (317,213 $ 595,604    $ 241,552    $ 147,602    $ (54,576
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

PER COMMON SHARE DATA [1]

Net (loss) income:

Basic:

From continuing operations

$ (1.88 $ 5.41    $ 1.99    $ 1.19    $ (0.30

From discontinued operations

  (1.20   0.39     0.37     0.25     (0.32
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

$ (3.08 $ 5.80    $ 2.36    $ 1.44    $ (0.62
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Diluted:

From continuing operations

$ (1.88 $ 5.39    $ 1.98    $ 1.19    $ (0.30

From discontinued operations

  (1.20   0.39     0.37     0.25     (0.32
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

$ (3.08 $ 5.78    $ 2.35    $ 1.44    $ (0.62
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Book Value

  40.76     44.26     39.35     37.71     36.67  

Market Price

  34.05     28.73     20.79     13.90     31.40  

Outstanding shares:

Average - basic

  102,848,792     102,693,685     102,429,755     102,179,393     88,515,404  

Average - assuming dilution

  102,848,792     103,061,475     102,653,610     102,289,496     88,515,404  

End of period

  103,476,847     103,397,699     103,169,806     102,590,457     102,272,780  

AVERAGE BALANCES

Net loans [2]

$ 22,366,750    $ 22,799,878    $ 22,786,545    $ 23,156,980    $ 22,959,995  

Earning assets

  29,897,273     29,741,099     29,510,753     30,470,545     31,292,238  

Total assets

  35,181,857     36,266,993     36,264,031     38,066,268     38,378,966  

Deposits

  24,654,954     24,571,382     24,702,622     25,185,910     24,126,467  

Borrowings

  3,514,203     4,291,861     4,414,483     5,845,407     7,444,013  

Total stockholders’ equity

  4,555,752     4,176,349     3,843,652     3,732,836     3,259,167  

PERIOD END BALANCE

Net loans [2]

$ 22,053,217    $ 24,706,719    $ 25,093,632    $ 25,314,392    $ 26,458,855  

Allowance for loan losses

  601,792     640,555     730,607     815,308     793,225  

Earning assets

  29,594,365     31,521,963     31,906,198     32,441,983     33,507,582  

Total assets

  33,096,695     35,749,333     36,507,535     37,348,432     38,814,998  

Deposits

  24,807,535     26,711,145     27,000,613     27,942,127     26,762,200  

Borrowings

  3,004,685     3,645,246     4,430,673     4,293,669     6,946,955  

Total stockholders’ equity

  4,267,382     4,626,150     4,110,000     3,918,753     3,800,531  

SELECTED RATIOS

Net interest margin (taxable equivalent basis) [3]

  4.96   4.73   4.47   4.48   3.82

Return on average total assets

  (0.89   1.65     0.68     0.40     0.36  

Return on average common stockholders’ equity

  (7.04   14.43     6.37     4.01     4.37  

Tier I Capital to risk-adjusted assets

  18.13     19.15     17.35     15.97     14.52  

Total Capital to risk-adjusted assets

  19.41     20.42     18.63     17.25     15.79  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

67


[1]

Per share data is based on the average number of shares outstanding during the periods, except for the book value and market price which are based on the information at the end of the periods. All per share data has been adjusted to retroactively reflect the 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected on May 29, 2012.

[2] Includes loans held-for-sale and covered loans.
[3]

Net interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2014 excludes the impact of the cost associated with the refinancing of structured repos at BPNA and the accelerated amortization of the discount related to the TARP funds amounting to $39.2 million and $414.1 million, respectively. The U.S. GAAP net Interest margin for the year ended December 31, 2014, on a taxable equivalent basis, was 3.45%. Refer additional information on the Net Interest Income section of this MD&A and to the reconciliation in Table 73.

The Corporation has strived to mitigate the decline in earning assets amid challenging economic conditions in Puerto Rico. During the first half of 2013, the Corporation completed two bulk purchases from Puerto Rico financial institutions acquiring $761.3 million in mortgage loans. Also, during 2012, the BPPR reportable segment purchased $265 million in consumer loans. During the first half of 2011, the Corporation completed two bulk purchases of residential mortgage loans from a Puerto Rico financial institution, adding $518 million in performing mortgage loans to its portfolio. The Corporation will continue to look for opportunities to supplement its organic growth with portfolio purchases.

On April 30, 2010, BPPR acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities of Westernbank from the FDIC in an assisted transaction. Table 2 provides a summary of the gross revenues derived from the assets acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction during 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Table 2 - Financial Information - Westernbank FDIC-Assisted Transaction

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Interest income:

        

Interest income on covered loans

   $ 293,610      $ 300,745      $ 301,441  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest income on covered loans

  293,610     300,745     301,441  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

FDIC loss share expense:

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

  (189,959   (161,635   (129,676

Reversal of accelerated amortization in prior periods

  12,492     —       —    

80% mirror accounting on credit impairment losses [1]

  32,038     60,454     58,187  

80% mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses

  58,117     50,985     30,771  

80% mirror accounting on recoveries on covered assets, including rental income on OREOs, subject to reimbursement to the FDIC

  (13,124   (16,057   (2,979

80% mirror accounting on amortization of contingent liability on unfunded commitments

  —       (473   (969

Change in true-up payment obligation

  (1,791   (15,993   (13,178

Other

  (797   668     1,633  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total FDIC loss share expense

  (103,024   (82,051   (56,211
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument

  —       —       —    

Amortization of contingent liability on unfunded commitments (included in other operating income)

  —       593     1,211  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues

  190,586     219,287     246,441  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Provision for loan losses

  46,135     69,396     74,839  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total revenues less provision for loan losses

$ 144,451   $ 149,891   $ 171,602  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1]

Reductions in expected cash flows for ASC 310-30 loans, which may impact the provision for loan losses, may consider reductions in both principal and interest cash flow expectations. The amount covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements for interest not collected from borrowers is limited under the agreements (approximately 90 days); accordingly, these amounts are not subject fully to the 80% mirror accounting.

 

Average balances

                    
     Years ended December 31,  

(In millions)

   2014      2013      2012  

Covered loans

   $ 2,771      $ 3,228      $ 4,050  

FDIC loss share asset

     748        1,310        1,680  

Interest income on covered loans for the year 2014 amounted to $ 294 million vs. $ 301million in 2013, reflecting a yield of 10.60% vs. 9.32%, for each year respectively. The increase in the yield was due to higher expected cash flows which are reflected in the accretable yield and recognized over the life of the loans and resolutions of loans during the year. This portfolio, due to its nature, should continue to decline as scheduled payments are received and workout arrangements are made. The yield improvement in 2014 reflects higher collections and estimated cash flows, which increase the accretable yield to be taken over the life of the loan pools.

 

68


The FDIC loss share reflected an expense of $ 103 million for 2014, compared to $ 82 million for 2013. This was mainly the result of higher amortization of the indemnification asset by $ 28 million, lower mirror accounting on credit impairment losses of $ 28 million, offset by lower unfavorable valuation adjustment on true up payment obligation of $14 million and higher mirror accounting income on reimbursable expenses of $7 million. For 2013, when compared to 2012 this line reflected a negative variance of $ 26 million due to higher amortization of the indemnification asset partially offset by higher mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses.

Although the increase in cash flows increases the accretable yield to be recognized over the life of the loans, it also has the effect of lowering the realizable value of the loss share asset since the Corporation would receive lower FDIC payments under the loss share agreements. This is reflected in the increased amortization of the loss share asset for 2014. The change in the amortization of the loss share asset from 2012 to 2013 also reflected higher expected cash flows from year to year.

The discussion that follows provides highlights of the Corporation’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to the results of operations of 2013. It also provides some highlights with respect to the Corporation’s financial condition, credit quality, capital and liquidity. Table 3 presents a five-year summary of the components of net income (loss) as a percentage of average total assets.

Table 3 - Components of Net Income (Loss) as a Percentage of Average Total Assets

 

     2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

Net interest income

     2.69     3.71     3.54     3.47     3.04

Provision for loan losses

     (0.77     (1.67     (1.10     (1.42     (2.37

Mortgage banking activities

     0.09       0.21       0.23       (0.01 )     0.04  

Net gain and valuation adjustments on investment securities

     —         0.02       —         0.03       0.01  

Net gain (loss) on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

     0.12       (0.15     (0.08 )     0.01       0.01  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves

     (0.12     (0.10     (0.06 )     (0.09 )     (0.19

Trading account profit (loss)

     0.01       (0.04 )     0.01       0.13       0.09  

FDIC loss share (expense) income

     (0.29     (0.23     (0.15     0.17       (0.07 )

Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument

     —         —         —         0.02       0.11  

Gain on sale of processing and technology business

     —         —         —         —         1.67  

Other non-interest income

     1.29       2.47       1.46       1.32       1.66  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total net interest income and non-interest income, net of provision for loan losses

  3.02     4.22     3.85     3.63     4.00  

Operating expenses

  (3.39   (3.37   (3.34   (3.00   (3.29
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax

  (0.37   0.85     0.51     0.63     0.71  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  0.17     (0.69   (0.07 )   0.30     0.28  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations

  (0.54   1.54     0.58     0.33     0.43  

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax

  (0.35   0.11     0.10     0.07     (0.07 )
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

  (0.89 )%    1.65   0.68   0.40   0.36
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income from the continuing business, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1.0 billion compared to $1.4 billion in 2013. Excluding the impact of the repayment of TARP funds and the refinancing of structured repos in the US, the net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, in 2014 was $1.5 billion compared to $1.4 billion during 2013. Net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis, was 3.45% in 2014. The adjusted net interest margin was 4.96% compared to 4.73% for 2013. The increase in the adjusted net interest margin was mainly related to higher yields from the commercial and mortgage loan portfolios as well as the impact of lower expected losses for the covered portfolio, which increases the accretable yield. Also, the renewal of time deposits at lower rates and lower cost of borrowings, after the repayment of TARP funds and refinancing of structured repos, helped improve margins for 2014. Refer to the Net Interest Income section of this MD&A for a discussion of the major variances in net interest income, including yields and costs.

 

69


The provision for loan losses for the non-covered portfolio was $224.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to 536.7 million for 2013. Excluding the impact of the bulk loan sales in each respective year, the adjusted provision for the non-covered portfolio was $211.2 million and $218.6 million for 2014 and 2013, respectively. The decline in the adjusted provision was mainly related to higher reserve releases at BPNA, offset by higher provisions at the BPPR segment. The continued economic weakness in Puerto Rico, our principal market, continues to present challenges which are being reflected in its overall reserve levels. The credit metrics in the U.S. reflect strong performance led by the improved risk profile of its loan portfolios, further strengthened by the sale of certain non-performing and legacy assets during the second half of the year 2014. Non-performing loans held in portfolio, at December 31, 2014 were $630.5 million, an increase of $32.6 million from 2013, driven by higher inflows in the BPPR segment, offset by a decline in BPNA due in part to the aforementioned bulk sales of non-performing and legacy assets.

Refer to the Provision for Loan Losses and Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for information on the allowance for loan losses, non-performing assets, troubled debt restructurings, net charge-offs and credit quality metrics.

Non-interest income for the year ended December 31, 2014 amounted to $386.5 million, a decrease of $404.5 million, compared with 2013. The FDIC indemnity asset amortization for the year 2014 included a benefit of approximately $12.5 million to reverse the impact of accelerated amortization expense recorded in prior periods. This amount will be recognized as expense over the remaining portion of the loss sharing agreement that expires in the quarter ending June 30, 2015. Excluding the impact of the $12.5 million FDIC indemnity asset amortization adjustment during 2014 and the $357.2 million of significant events during 2013, which include the impact of the NPA’s sales and EVERTEC’s public offerings, non-interest income decreased by $61.5 million principally due to lower income from mortgage banking activities, higher provision for indemnity reserves, and lower service fees and charges on deposits, offset by higher gain on sales of loans, mainly at BPNA, and trading account profits. Refer to the Non-Interest Income section of this MD&A for a table that provides a breakdown of the different categories of non-interest income.

Total operating expenses for the year 2014 amounted to $1.2 billion, a decrease of $28.3 million, when compared with the previous year. Operating expenses for 2014 included non-recurring restructuring charges related to the U.S. operations for $26.7 million, executive compensation costs for $3.0 million, lease cancellation costs for $1.9 million and early debt extinguishment costs for $532 thousand. For the year 2013, operating expenses included $37.0 million in OREO expenses related to the bulk sale of non-performing assets and $1.1 million in professional services mainly related to EVERTEC’s public offerings. Excluding the impact of these charges, detailed in tables 72 and 73, operating expenses for 2014 declined by $22.3 million due mainly to lower pension and medical costs and lower FDIC insurance expense, partially offset by higher professional fees and OREO expenses. Refer to the Operating Expenses section of this MD&A for additional explanations on the major variances in the different categories of operating expenses.

For the year 2014, the Corporation recorded an income tax expense of $58.3 million, compared to a benefit of $251.3 million for the year 2013. During the year 2014, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $23.4 million in connection with a Closing Agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury related to the income tax treatment of certain charge-offs of the covered portfolio and an expense of approximately $8.0 million to record a valuation allowance in the deferred tax asset at the Holding Company, which were partially offset by an expense of $20.0 million related to the change in the capital gains tax rate from 15% to 20%, pursuant to an amendment to the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code. During the year 2013, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $197.5 million reflecting the impact on its deferred tax assets of an amendment to the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code which, among other things, increased the marginal tax rate from 30% to 39%. In addition, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $146.4 million in connection with the loss generated on the Puerto Rico operations by the sales of non-performing assets that took place during the year 2013 and a tax expense of $23.7 million related to the gain realized on the sale of a portion of EVERTEC’s shares which was taxable at a preferential tax rate. Refer to the Income Taxes section in this MD&A and Note 43 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on income taxes.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s total assets were $33.1 billion, compared with $35.7 billion at December 31, 2013, a decrease of $2.6 billion, or 7%. Total earning assets at December 31, 2014 amounted to $29.5 billion, a decrease of $2.0 billion, or 7%, compared with December 31, 2013.

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, totaled $19.4 billion, a decrease of $2.2 billion compared to 2013. The decrease is due mainly to the sale of approximately $1.8 billion in loans from the U.S. discontinued businesses in California, Illinois and Central Florida. Also, during the year, the U.S. operations completed the sale or entered into agreements to sell approximately $249 million of non-performing and legacy loans in addition to sales under its normal workout strategies. The covered portfolio declined by $442.0 million as this portfolio continues its normal run-off. Loans held-for-sale declined by $4.3 million from 2013, due to a decline in mortgage originations for sale in the secondary market, offset by a higher volume of consumer loans, particularly auto loans.

 

70


Refer to Table 19 in the Statement of Financial Condition Analysis section of this MD&A for the percentage allocation of the composition of the Corporation’s financing to total assets. Deposits amounted to $24.8 billion at December 31, 2014, compared with $26.7 billion at December 31, 2013. Table 20 presents a breakdown of deposits by major categories. The decrease in deposits is due mainly to the sale of approximately $2.0 billion in deposits in connection with the sale of the California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations. The Corporation’s borrowings amounted to $3.0 billion at December 31, 2014, compared with $3.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The decline in borrowings is mainly due to lower balance of repos and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of NY.

Stockholders’ equity amounted to $4.3 billion at December 31, 2014, compared with $4.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The Corporation continues to be well-capitalized at December 31, 2014. The Tier 1 risk-based capital and Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets stood at 18.13% and 15.89%, respectively, at December 31, 2014, compared with 19.15% and 14.83%, respectively, at December 31, 2013. The change in the Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios from the end of 2013 to December 31, 2014 was principally due to the repurchase on July 2, 2014 of $935 million of capital securities held by the U.S. Treasury in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase Program. This unfavorable impact to the regulatory capital ratios was in part off-set by a reduction in risk-weighted assets, mostly driven by the U.S. regional sales.

In summary, during 2014, the Corporation achieved significant milestones on its continuing efforts to strengthen its operations and the outlook for future profitability as evidenced by the repayment of TARP funds and substantial progress toward the completion of the restructuring of the U.S. operations. The Corporation continues to benefit from its stake in EVERTEC and BHD, the second largest bank in the Dominican Republic, and improved performance of its U.S. operations.

Moving forward, in Puerto Rico, the Corporation will continue to focus on its credit performance and to identify opportunities to complement its organic growth with opportunistic portfolio acquisitions. In the U.S. mainland, the Corporation expects to solidify the trend of improving credit quality by continuing the run-off or disposition of legacy portfolios, actively managing the existing classified portfolio, and identifying new asset growth opportunities in selected loan categories.

For further discussion of operating results, financial condition and business risks refer to the narrative and tables included herein.

The shares of the Corporation’s common stock are traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol BPOP. Table 4 shows the Corporation’s common stock performance on a quarterly basis during the last five years.

 

71


Table 4 - Common Stock Performance

 

     Market Price      Cash Dividends      Book Value      Dividend    Price/
Earnings
    Market/Book  
     High      Low      Declared per Share      Per Share      Yield [1]    Ratio     Ratio  

2014

            $  40.76      N.M.      (11.06 )x      83.54

4th quarter

   $ 34.14      $ 27.34      $ —               

3rd quarter

     34.64        29.44        —               

2nd quarter

     34.18        28.93        —               

1st quarter

     31.50        25.50        —               

2013

              44.26      N.M.      4.95        64.91  

4th quarter

   $ 29.17      $ 24.07      $ —               

3rd quarter

     34.20        26.25        —               

2nd quarter

     30.60        26.88        —               

1st quarter

     28.92        21.70        —               

2012

              39.35      N.M.      8.85        52.83  

4th quarter

   $ 20.90      $ 17.42      $ —               

3rd quarter

     18.74        13.55        —               

2nd quarter

     21.20        13.58        —               

1st quarter

     23.00        14.30        —               

2011

              37.71      N.M.      9.65        36.86  

4th quarter

   $ 19.00      $ 11.15      $ —               

3rd quarter

     28.30        13.70        —               

2nd quarter

     32.40        26.30        —               

1st quarter

     35.33        28.70        —               

2010

              36.67      N.M.      (50.65     85.63  

4th quarter

   $ 31.40      $ 27.01      $ —               

3rd quarter

     29.50        24.50        —               

2nd quarter

     40.20        26.40        —               

1st quarter

     29.10        17.50        —               

 

[1] Based on the average high and low market price for the four quarters.

Note: All per share data has been adjusted to retroactively reflect the 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected on May 29, 2012.

N.M. – Not meaningful.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES / ESTIMATES

The accounting and reporting policies followed by the Corporation and its subsidiaries conform with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America and general practices within the financial services industry. The Corporation’s significant accounting policies are described in detail in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with this section.

Critical accounting policies require management to make estimates and assumptions, which involve significant judgment about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and that involve a high degree of subjectivity. These estimates are made under facts and circumstances at a point in time and changes in those facts and circumstances could produce actual results that differ from those estimates. The following MD&A section is a summary of what management considers the Corporation’s critical accounting policies / estimates.

Fair Value Measurement of Financial Instruments

The Corporation measures fair value as required by ASC Subtopic 820-10 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, which defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Corporation currently measures at fair value on a recurring basis its trading assets, available-for-sale securities, derivatives,

 

72


mortgage servicing rights and contingent consideration. Occasionally, the Corporation may be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held-for-sale, impaired loans held-in-portfolio that are collateral dependent and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically result from the application of lower of cost or fair value accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The Corporation categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at fair value under the three-level hierarchy. The level within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs to the valuation methodology used for fair value measurement are observable. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

 

   

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. No significant degree of judgment for these valuations is needed, as they are based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market.

 

   

Level 2 - Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

 

   

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value measurement of the financial asset or liability. Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporation’s own assumptions about what market participants would use to price the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. The inputs are developed based on the best available information, which might include the Corporation’s own data such as internally-developed models and discounted cash flow analyses.

The Corporation requires the use of observable inputs when available, in order to minimize the use of unobservable inputs to determine fair value. The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not necessarily an indication of the risk associated with investing on those securities. The amount of judgment involved in estimating the fair value of a financial instrument depends upon the availability of quoted market prices or observable market parameters. In addition, it may be affected by other factors such as the type of instrument, the liquidity of the market for the instrument, transparency around the inputs to the valuation, as well as the contractual characteristics of the instrument.

If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs valuation models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rate curves, volatilities, credit curves, and discount, prepayment and delinquency rates, among other considerations. When market observable data is not available, the valuation of financial instruments becomes more subjective and involves substantial judgment. The need to use unobservable inputs generally results from diminished observability of both actual trades and assumptions resulting from the lack of market liquidity for those types of loans or securities. When fair values are estimated based on modeling techniques such as discounted cash flow models, the Corporation uses assumptions such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity rates and discount rates. Valuation adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value is adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace.

The fair value measurements and disclosures guidance in ASC Subtopic 820-10 also addresses measuring fair value in situations where markets are inactive and transactions are not orderly. Transactions or quoted prices for assets and liabilities may not be determinative of fair value when transactions are not orderly and thus may require adjustments to estimate fair value. Price quotes based on transactions that are not orderly should be given little, if any, weight in measuring fair value. Price quotes based upon transactions that are orderly shall be considered in determining fair value and the weight given is based on facts and circumstances. If sufficient information is not available to determine if price quotes are based upon orderly transactions, less weight should be given to the price quote relative to other transactions that are known to be orderly.

The lack of liquidity is incorporated into the fair value measurement based on the type of asset measured and the valuation methodology used. An illiquid market is one in which little or no observable activity has occurred or one that lacks willing buyers or willing sellers. Discounted cash flow techniques incorporate forecasting of expected cash flows discounted at appropriate market discount rates which reflect the lack of liquidity in the market which a market participant would consider. Broker quotes used for fair value measurements inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the market since they represent an exit price from the perspective of the market participants.

 

73


Management believes that fair values are reasonable and consistent with the fair value measurement guidance based on the Corporation’s internal validation procedure and consistency of the processes followed, which include obtaining market quotes when possible or using valuation techniques that incorporate market-based inputs.

Refer to Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the Corporation’s fair value measurement disclosures required by the applicable accounting standard. At December 31, 2014, approximately $ 5.5 billion, or 97%, of the assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis used market-based or market-derived valuation methodology and, therefore, were classified as Level 1 or Level 2. The majority of instruments measured at fair value were classified as Level 2, including U.S. Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions, most mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), and derivative instruments. U.S. Treasury securities were valued based on yields that were interpolated from the constant maturity treasury curve. Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities were priced based on an active exchange market and on quoted prices for similar securities. Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions were valued based on trades, bid price or spread, two sided markets, quotes, benchmark curves, market data feeds, discount and capital rates and trustee reports. MBS and CMOs were priced based on a bond’s theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector. Refer to the Derivatives section below for a description of the valuation techniques used to value these derivative instruments.

The remaining 3% of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2014 were classified as Level 3 since their valuation methodology considered significant unobservable inputs. The financial assets measured as Level 3 included mostly Puerto Rico tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities and mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”). GNMA tax exempt mortgage-backed securities are priced using a local demand price matrix prepared from local dealer quotes, and other local investments such as corporate securities and local mutual funds which are priced by local dealers. MSRs, on the other hand, are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model which considers servicing fees, portfolio characteristics, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Additionally, the Corporation reported $ 93 million of financial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at December 31, 2014, all of which were classified as Level 3 in the hierarchy.

Broker quotes used for fair value measurements inherently reflect any lack of liquidity in the market since they represent an exit price from the perspective of the market participants. Financial assets that were fair valued using broker quotes amounted to $ 22 million at December 31, 2014, of which $ 14 million were Level 3 assets and $ 8 million were Level 2 assets. Level 3 assets consisted principally of tax-exempt GNMA mortgage-backed securities. Fair value for these securities was based on an internally-prepared matrix derived from an average of two indicative local broker quotes. The main input used in the matrix pricing was non-binding local broker quotes obtained from limited trade activity. Therefore, these securities were classified as Level 3.

There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2012. There were $ 2 million in transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 and $8 million in transfers from Level 3 to Level 2 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2012. The transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 of trading mortgage-backed securities were the result of a change in valuation technique to a matrix pricing model, based on indicative prices provided by brokers. The transfers from Level 3 to Level 2 of trading mortgage-backed securities resulted from observable market data becoming available for these securities. The Corporation’s policy is to recognize transfers as of the end of the reporting period.

Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

The majority of the values for trading account securities and investment securities available-for-sale are obtained from third-party pricing services and are validated with alternate pricing sources when available. Securities not priced by a secondary pricing source are documented and validated internally according to their significance to the Corporation’s financial statements. Management has established materiality thresholds according to the investment class to monitor and investigate material deviations in prices obtained from the primary pricing service provider and the secondary pricing source used as support for the valuation results. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation did not adjust any prices obtained from pricing service providers or broker dealers.

Inputs are evaluated to ascertain that they consider current market conditions, including the relative liquidity of the market. When a market quote for a specific security is not available, the pricing service provider generally uses observable data to derive an exit price for the instrument, such as benchmark yield curves and trade data for similar products. To the extent trading data is not available, the pricing service provider relies on specific information including dialogue with brokers, buy side clients, credit ratings, spreads to established benchmarks and transactions on similar securities, to draw correlations based on the characteristics of the

 

74


evaluated instrument. If for any reason the pricing service provider cannot observe data required to feed its model, it discontinues pricing the instrument. During the year ended December 31, 2014, none of the Corporation’s investment securities were subject to pricing discontinuance by the pricing service providers. The pricing methodology and approach of our primary pricing service providers is concluded to be consistent with the fair value measurement guidance.

Furthermore, management assesses the fair value of its portfolio of investment securities at least on a quarterly basis, which includes analyzing changes in fair value that have resulted in losses that may be considered other-than-temporary. Factors considered include, for example, the nature of the investment, severity and duration of possible impairments, industry reports, sector credit ratings, economic environment, creditworthiness of the issuers and any guarantees.

Securities are classified in the fair value hierarchy according to product type, characteristics and market liquidity. At the end of each period, management assesses the valuation hierarchy for each asset or liability measured. The fair value measurement analysis performed by the Corporation includes validation procedures and review of market changes, pricing methodology, assumption and level hierarchy changes, and evaluation of distressed transactions.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s portfolio of trading and investment securities available-for-sale amounted to $ 5.5 billion and represented 97% of the Corporation’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis. At December 31, 2014, net unrealized gains on the trading securities approximated $7 million and net unrealized losses on available-for-sale investment securities portfolio approximated to $ 8 million. Fair values for most of the Corporation’s trading and investment securities available-for-sale were classified as Level 2. Trading and investment securities available-for-sale classified as Level 3, which were the securities that involved the highest degree of judgment, represent less than 1% of the Corporation’s total portfolio of trading and investment securities available-for-sale.

Mortgage Servicing Rights

Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”), which amounted to $ 149 million at December 31, 2014, and are primarily related to residential mortgage loans originated in Puerto Rico, do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices. Fair value is estimated based upon discounted net cash flows calculated from a combination of loan level data and market assumptions. The valuation model combines loans with common characteristics that impact servicing cash flows (e.g. investor, remittance cycle, interest rate, product type, etc.) in order to project net cash flows. Market valuation assumptions include prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service, escrow account earnings, and contractual servicing fee income, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are derived from market data that is more relevant to the U.S. mainland loan portfolios and, thus, are adjusted for the Corporation’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior since prepayment rates in Puerto Rico have been historically lower. Other assumptions are, in the most part, directly obtained from third-party providers. Disclosure of two of the key economic assumptions used to measure MSRs, which are prepayment speed and discount rate, and a sensitivity analysis to adverse changes to these assumptions, is included in Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements.

Derivatives

Derivatives, such as interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options, are traded in over-the-counter active markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach based on present value and option pricing models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or “to be announced securities” (“TBAs”). All of these derivatives held by the Corporation were classified as Level 2. Valuations of derivative assets and liabilities reflect the values associated with counterparty risk and nonperformance risk, respectively. The non-performance risk, which measures the Corporation’s own credit risk, is determined using internally-developed models that consider the net realizable value of the collateral posted, remaining term, and the creditworthiness or credit standing of the Corporation. The counterparty risk is also determined using internally-developed models which incorporate the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, net realizable value of the collateral received, and available public data or internally-developed data to determine their probability of default. To manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation employs procedures for credit approvals and credit limits, monitors the counterparties’ credit condition, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, requests additional collateral. During the year ended December 31, 2014, inclusion of credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives resulted in a net gain of $1.1 million recorded in the other operating income and interest expense captions of the consolidated statement of operations, which consisted of a loss of $0.1 million resulting from the Corporation’s own credit standing adjustment and a gain of $1.2 million from the assessment of the counterparties’ credit risk.

 

75


Contingent consideration liability

The fair value of the true-up payment obligation (contingent consideration) to the FDIC as it relates to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction amounted to $ 129 million at December 31, 2014. The fair value was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements at the true-up measurement date, taking into consideration the intrinsic loss estimate, asset premium/discount, cumulative shared loss payments, and the cumulative servicing amount related to the loan portfolio. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the true-up payment formula. The true-up payment obligation was discounted using a term rate consistent with the time remaining until the payment is due. The discount rate was an estimate of the sum of the risk-free benchmark rate for the term remaining before the true-up payment is due and a risk premium to account for the credit risk profile of BPPR. The risk premium was calculated using a three day average of Popular, Inc.’s 5-year note issuance.

Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral dependent

The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, size and supply and demand. The challenging conditions of the housing markets continue to affect the market activity related to real estate properties. These collateral dependent impaired loans are classified as Level 3 and are reported as a nonrecurring fair value measurement.

Loans measured at fair value pursuant to lower of cost or fair value adjustments

Loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis pursuant to lower of cost or fair value were priced based on secondary market prices and discounted cash flow models which incorporate internally-developed assumptions for prepayments and credit loss estimates. These loans are classified as Level 3.

Other real estate owned and other foreclosed assets

Other real estate owned includes real estate properties securing mortgage, consumer, and commercial loans. Other foreclosed assets include automobiles securing auto loans. The fair value of foreclosed assets may be determined using an external appraisal, broker price opinion, internal valuation or binding offer. The majority of these foreclosed assets is classified as Level 3 since they are subject to internal adjustments and reported as a nonrecurring fair value measurement.

Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

Interest on loans is accrued and recorded as interest income based upon the principal amount outstanding.

Non-accrual loans are those loans on which the accrual of interest is discontinued. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is charged against income and the loan is accounted for either on a cash-basis method or on the cost-recovery method. Loans designated as non-accruing are returned to accrual status when the Corporation expects repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest. The determination as to the ultimate collectability of the loan’s balance may involve management’s judgment in the evaluation of the borrower’s financial condition and prospects for repayment.

Refer to the MD&A section titled Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality, particularly the Non-performing assets sub-section, for a detailed description of the Corporation’s non-accruing and charge-off policies by major loan categories.

One of the most critical and complex accounting estimates is associated with the determination of the allowance for loan losses. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based on this determination. The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with accounting guidance, specifically guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35.

The accounting guidance provides for the recognition of a loss allowance for groups of homogeneous loans. The determination for general reserves of the allowance for loan losses includes the following principal factors:

 

   

Base net loss rates, which are based on the moving average of annualized net loss rates computed over a 3-year historical loss period for the commercial and construction loan portfolios, and an 18-month period for the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios. The base net loss rates are applied by loan type and by legal entity.

 

76


   

Recent loss trend adjustment, which replaces the base loss rate with a 12-month average loss rate, when these trends are higher than the respective base loss rates. The objective of this adjustment is to allow for a more recent loss trend to be captured and reflected in the ALLL estimation process. As part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models, as discussed in the following paragraphs and implemented as of June 30, 2014, the Corporation eliminated the use of caps in the recent loss trend adjustment for the consumer and mortgage portfolios, among other enhancements. For the period ended December 31, 2013, the recent loss trend adjustment caps for the consumer and mortgage portfolios were triggered in only one portfolio segment within the Puerto Rico consumer portfolio. Management assessed the impact of the applicable cap through a review of qualitative factors that specifically considered the drivers of recent loss trends and changes to the portfolio composition. The related effect of the aforementioned cap was immaterial for the overall level of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses for the Puerto Rico Consumer portfolio.

For the period ended December 31, 2014, 50% (December 31, 2013 - 27%) of the ALLL for BPPR non-covered loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial, personal and auto loan portfolios for 2014, and in the commercial multi-family, mortgage, and leasing portfolios for 2013.

For the period ended December 31, 2014, 21% (December 31, 2013 - 29%) of the ALLL for BPNA loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial and legacy loan portfolios for 2014 and in the commercial multi-family, commercial real estate non-owner occupied and commercial and industrial portfolios for 2013.

 

   

Environmental factors, which include credit and macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rate, economic activity index and delinquency rates, adopted to account for current market conditions that are likely to cause estimated credit losses to differ from historical losses. The Corporation reflects the effect of these environmental factors on each loan group as an adjustment that, as appropriate, increases the historical loss rate applied to each group. Environmental factors provide updated perspective on credit and economic conditions. Regression analysis is used to select these indicators and quantify the effect on the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses.

During the second quarter of 2014, management completed the annual review of the components of the ALLL models. As part of this review management updated core metrics and revised certain components related to the estimation process for evaluating the adequacy of the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses. These enhancements to the ALLL methodology, which are described in the paragraphs below, were implemented as of June 30, 2014 and resulted in a net decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $18.7 million for the non-covered portfolio and a net increase to the allowance for loan losses of $0.8 million for the covered portfolio.

Management made the following principal enhancements to the methodology during the second quarter of 2014:

 

   

Annual review and recalibration of the environmental factors adjustment. The environmental factor adjustments are developed by performing regression analyses on selected credit and economic indicators for each applicable loan segment. During the second quarter of 2014, the environmental factor models used to account for changes in current credit and macroeconomic conditions were reviewed and recalibrated based on the latest applicable trends. Management also revised the application of environmental factors to the historical loss rates to consider last 12 month trends of the applicable credit and macroeconomic indicators applied as an incremental adjustment to account for emerging risks not necessarily considered in the historical loss rates.

The combined effect of the aforementioned recalibration and enhancements to the environmental factors adjustment resulted in a decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $17 million at June 30, 2014, of which $14.1 million related to the non-covered BPPR segment and $3.7 million related to the BPNA segment, offset in part by a $0.8 million increase in the BPPR covered segment.

 

   

Increased the historical look-back period for determining the recent loss trend adjustment for consumer and mortgage loans. The Corporation increased the look-back period for assessing recent trends applicable to the determination of consumer and mortgage loan net charge-offs from 6 months to 12 months and eliminated the use of caps. Previously, the Corporation used a recent loss trend adjustment based on 6 months of net charge-offs up to a

 

77


 

determined cap. Given the current overall consumer and mortgage credit quality improvements, management concluded that a 12-month look-back period for the recent loss trend adjustment aligns the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology to current credit quality trends while limiting excessive pro-cyclicality given the longer look-back period analysis, thus, eliminating the aforementioned caps.

The combined effect of the aforementioned enhancements to the recent loss trend adjustment resulted in a decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $1 million at June 30, 2014, of which $0.9 million related to the non-covered BPPR segment and $0.1 million related to the BPNA segment.

According to the loan impairment accounting guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35, a loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the principal and/or interest are not going to be collected according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement. Current information and events include “environmental” factors, e.g. existing industry, geographical, economic and political factors. Probable means the future event or events which will confirm the loss or impairment of the loan is likely to occur.

The Corporation defines commercial and construction impaired loans as borrowers with total debt greater than or equal to $1 million with 90 days or more past due, as well as all loans whose terms have been modified in a trouble debt restructuring (“TDRs”). In addition, larger commercial and construction loans ($1 million and over) that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review and thus evaluated for impairment. Commercial and construction loans that originally met the Corporation’s threshold for impairment identification in a prior period, but due to charge-offs or payments are currently below the $1 million threshold and are still 90 days past due, except for TDRs, are accounted for under the Corporation’s general reserve methodology. Although the accounting codification guidance for specific impairment of a loan excludes large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment (e.g. mortgage and consumer loans), it specifically requires that loan modifications considered troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) be analyzed under its provisions. An allowance for loan impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of an impaired loan exceeds the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate, the observable market price of the loan, if available, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

The fair value of the collateral on commercial and construction loans is generally derived from appraisals. The Corporation periodically requires updated appraisal reports for loans that are considered impaired. The frequency of updated appraisals depends on total debt outstanding and type of collateral. Currently, for commercial and construction loans secured by real estate, if the borrower’s total debt is equal to or greater than $1 million, the appraisal is updated annually. If the borrower’s total debt is less than $1 million, the appraisal is updated at least every two years.

As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals as part of the underwriting and approval process and also for credits considered impaired following certain materiality benchmarks. Appraisals may be adjusted due to their age, property conditions, geographical area or general market conditions. The adjustments applied are based upon internal information, like other appraisals and/or loss severity information that can provide historical trends in the real estate market. Discount rates used may change from time-to-time based on management’s estimates. Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality section of this MD&A for more detailed information on the Corporation’s collateral value estimation for other real estate.

The Corporation’s management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis following a systematic methodology in order to provide for known and inherent risks in the loan portfolio. In developing its assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, the Corporation must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown such as economic developments affecting specific customers, industries or markets. Other factors that can affect management’s estimates are the years of historical data to include when estimating losses, the level of volatility of losses in a specific portfolio, changes in underwriting standards, financial accounting standards and loan impairment measurement, among others. Changes in the financial condition of individual borrowers, in economic conditions, in historical loss experience and in the condition of the various markets in which collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance for loan losses. Consequently, the business, financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of operations could also be affected.

The collateral dependent method is generally used for the impairment determination on commercial and construction loans since the expected realizable value of the loan is based upon the proceeds received from the liquidation of the collateral property. For commercial properties, the “as is” value or the “income approach” value is used depending on the financial condition of the subject

 

78


borrower and/or the nature of the subject collateral. In most cases, impaired commercial loans do not have reliable or sustainable cash flow to use the discounted cash flow valuation method. On construction loans, “as developed” collateral values are used when the loan is originated since the assumption is that the cash flow of the property once leased or sold will provide sufficient funds to repay the loan. In the case of many impaired construction loans, the “as developed” collateral value is also used since completing the project reflects the best exit strategy in terms of potential loss reduction. In these cases, the costs to complete are considered as part of the impairment determination. As a general rule, the appraisal valuation used by the Corporation for impaired construction loans is based on discounted value to a single purchaser, discounted sell out or “as is” depending on the condition and status of the project and the performance of the same.

A restructuring constitutes a TDR when the Corporation separately concludes that both of the following conditions exist: (i) the restructuring constitutes a concession and (ii) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. The concessions stem from an agreement between the creditor and the debtor or are imposed by law or a court. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. A concession has been granted when, as a result of the restructuring, the Corporation does not expect to collect all amounts due, including interest accrued at the original contract rate. If the payment of principal is dependent on the value of collateral, the current value of the collateral is taken into consideration in determining the amount of principal to be collected; therefore, all factors that changed are considered to determine if a concession was granted, including the change in the fair value of the underlying collateral that may be used to repay the loan. In addition, in order to expedite the resolution of delinquent construction and commercial loans, the Corporation routinely enters into liquidation agreements with borrowers and guarantors through the regular legal process, bankruptcy procedures and in certain occasions, out of Court transactions. These liquidation agreements, in general, contemplate the following conditions: (1) consent to judgment by the borrowers and guarantors; (2) acknowledgement by the borrower of debt, its liquidity and maturity; (3) acknowledgement of the default payments. The contractual interest rate is not reduced and continues to accrue during the term of the agreement. At the end of the period, borrower is obligated to remit all amounts due or be subject to the Corporation’s exercise of its foreclosure rights and further collection efforts. Likewise, the borrower’s failure to make stipulated payments will grant the Corporation the ability to exercise its foreclosure rights. This strategy procures to expedite the foreclosure process, resulting in a more effective and efficient collection process. Although in general, these liquidation agreements do not contemplate the forgiveness of principal or interest as debtor is required to cover all outstanding amounts when the agreement becomes due, it could be construed that the Corporation has granted a concession by temporarily accepting a payment schedule that is different from the contractual payment schedule. Accordingly, loans under this program are considered TDRs.

Classification of loan modifications as TDRs involves a degree of judgment. Indicators that the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties which are considered include: (i) the borrower is currently in default on any of its debt or it is probable that the borrower would be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification; (ii) the borrower has declared or is in the process of declaring bankruptcy; (iii) there is significant doubt as to whether the borrower will continue to be a going concern; (iv) the borrower has securities that have been delisted, are in the process of being delisted, or are under threat of being delisted from an exchange; (v) based on estimates and projections that only encompass the borrower’s current business capabilities, it is forecasted that the entity-specific cash flows will be insufficient to service the debt (both interest and principal) in accordance with the contractual terms of the existing agreement through maturity; and (vi) absent the current modification, the borrower cannot obtain funds from sources other than the existing creditors at an effective interest rate equal to the current market interest rate for similar debt for a non-troubled debtor. The identification of TDRs is critical in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Loans classified as TDRs are excluded from TDR status if performance under the restructured terms exists for a reasonable period (at least twelve months of sustained performance) and the loan yields a market rate.

For mortgage and other consumer loans that are modified with regard to payment terms and which constitute TDRs, the discounted cash flow value method is used as the impairment valuation is more appropriately calculated based on the ongoing cash flow from the individuals rather than the liquidation of the collateral asset. The computations give consideration to probability of default and loss-given default on the related estimated cash flows.

Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for disclosures on the impact of adopting ASU 2011-02 and to Note 3 for a general description of the ASU 2011-02 guidance.

 

79


Acquisition Accounting for Covered Loans and Related Indemnification Asset

The Corporation accounted for the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction under the accounting guidance of ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations , which requires the use of the purchase method of accounting. All identifiable assets and liabilities acquired were initially recorded at fair value. No allowance for loan losses related to the acquired loans was recorded on the acquisition date as the fair value of the loans acquired incorporated assumptions regarding credit risk. Loans acquired were recorded at fair value in accordance with the fair value methodology prescribed in ASC Topic 820, exclusive of the shared-loss agreements with the FDIC. These fair value estimates associated with the loans included estimates related to expected prepayments and the amount and timing of expected principal, interest and other cash flows.

Because the FDIC has agreed to reimburse the Corporation for losses related to the acquired loans in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, subject to certain provisions specified in the agreements, an indemnification asset was recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. The indemnification asset was recognized at the same time as the indemnified loans, and is measured on the same basis, subject to collectability or contractual limitations. The loss share indemnification asset on the acquisition date reflected the reimbursements expected to be received from the FDIC, using an appropriate discount rate, which reflected counterparty credit risk and other uncertainties.

The initial valuation of these loans and related indemnification asset required management to make subjective judgments concerning estimates about how the acquired loans would perform in the future using valuation methods, including discounted cash flow analyses and independent third-party appraisals. Factors that may significantly affect the initial valuation included, among others, market-based and industry data related to expected changes in interest rates, assumptions related to probability and severity of credit losses, estimated timing of credit losses including the timing of foreclosure and liquidation of collateral, expected prepayment rates, required or anticipated loan modifications, unfunded loan commitments, the specific terms and provisions of any loss share agreements, and specific industry and market conditions that may impact discount rates and independent third-party appraisals.

The Corporation applied the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to all loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction (including loans that do not meet the scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30), except for credit cards and revolving lines of credit. ASC Subtopic 310-30 provides two specific criteria that have to be met in order for a loan to be within its scope: (1) credit deterioration on the loan from its inception until the acquisition date and (2) that it is probable that not all of the contractual cash flows will be collected on the loan. Once in the scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30, the credit portion of the fair value discount on an acquired loan cannot be accreted into income until the acquirer has assessed that it expects to receive more cash flows on the loan than initially anticipated.

Acquired loans that meet the definition of nonaccrual status fall within the Corporation’s definition of impaired loans under ASC Subtopic 310-30. It is possible that performing loans would not meet criteria number 1 above related to evidence of credit deterioration since the date of loan origination, and therefore not fall within the scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30. Based on the fair value determined for the acquired portfolio, acquired loans that did not meet the Corporation’s definition of non-accrual status also resulted in the recognition of a significant discount attributable to credit quality.

Given the significant discount related to credit in the valuation of the Westernbank acquired portfolio, the Corporation considered two possible options for the performing loans (1) accrete the entire fair value discount (including the credit portion) using the interest method over the life of the loan in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-20; or (2) analogize to ASC Subtopic 310-30 and only accrete the portion of the fair value discount unrelated to credit.

Pursuant to an AICPA letter dated December 18, 2009, the AICPA summarized the SEC Staff’s view regarding the accounting in subsequent periods for discount accretion associated with loan receivables acquired in a business combination or asset purchase. Regarding the accounting for such loan receivables, in the absence of further standard setting, the AICPA understands that the SEC Staff would not object to an accounting policy based on contractual cash flows (Option 1 - ASC Subtopic 310-20 approach) or an accounting policy based on expected cash flows (Option 2 – ASC Subtopic 310-30 approach). As such, the Corporation considered the two allowable options as follows:

 

   

Option 1 - Since the credit portion of the fair value discount is associated with an expectation of cash flows that an acquirer does not expect to receive over the life of the loan, it does not appear appropriate to accrete that portion over the life of the loan as doing so could eventually overstate the acquirer’s expected value of the loan and ultimately result in recognizing income (i.e. through the accretion of the yield) on a portion of the loan it does not expect to receive. Therefore, the Corporation does not believe this is an appropriate method to apply.

 

   

Option 2 – The Corporation believes analogizing to ASC Subtopic 310-30 is the more appropriate option to follow in accounting for the credit portion of the fair value discount. By doing so, the loan is only being accreted up to the value that the acquirer expected to receive at acquisition of the loan.

 

80


Based on the above, the Corporation elected Option 2 – the ASC Subtopic 310-30 approach to the outstanding balance for all the acquired loans in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction with the exception of revolving lines of credit with active privileges as of the acquisition date, which are explicitly scoped out by the ASC Subtopic 310-30 accounting guidance. New advances / draws after the acquisition date under existing credit lines that did not have revolving privileges as of the acquisition date, particularly for construction loans, will effectively be treated as a “new” loan for accounting purposes and accounted for under the provisions of ASC Subtopic 310-20, resulting in a hybrid accounting for the overall construction loan balance.

Management used judgment in evaluating factors impacting expected cash flows and probable loss assumptions, including the quality of the loan portfolio, portfolio concentrations, distressed economic conditions in Puerto Rico, quality of underwriting standards of the acquired institution, reductions in collateral real estate values, and material weaknesses disclosed by the acquired institution, including matters related to credit quality review and appraisal report review.

At April 30, 2010, the acquired loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation totaled $4.9 billion which represented undiscounted unpaid contractually-required principal and interest balances of $9.9 billion reduced by a discount of $5.0 billion resulting from acquisition date fair value adjustments. The non-accretable discount on loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 amounted to $3.4 billion or approximately 68% of the total discount, thus indicating a significant amount of expected credit losses on the acquired portfolios.

Pursuant to ASC Section 310-20-15-5, the Corporation aggregated loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction into pools with common risk characteristics for purposes of applying the recognition, measurement and disclosure provisions of this subtopic. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Characteristics considered in pooling loans in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction included loan type, interest rate type, accruing status, amortization type, rate index and source type. Once the pools are defined, the Corporation maintains the integrity of the pool of multiple loans accounted for as a single asset.

Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the fair value of the loans, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of the loan if the timing and amount of the future cash flows of the pool is reasonably estimable. The non-accretable difference represents the difference between contractually required principal and interest and the cash flows expected to be collected. Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date are recognized as interest income prospectively as an adjustment to accretable yield over the pool’s remaining life. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date are generally recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses.

The fair value discount of lines of credit with revolving privileges that are accounted for pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, represented the difference between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loan. Any cash flows collected in excess of the carrying amount of the loan are recognized in earnings at the time of collection. The carrying amount of lines of credit with revolving privileges, which are accounted pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, are subject to periodic review to determine the need for recognizing an allowance for loan losses.

The FDIC loss share indemnification asset for loss share agreements is measured separately from the related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the assets and is not transferable with the assets should the assets be sold.

The FDIC loss share indemnification asset is recognized on the same basis as the assets subject to loss share protection, except that the amortization / accretion terms differ for each asset. For covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, decreases in expected reimbursements from the FDIC due to improvements in expected cash flows to be received from borrowers are recognized in non-interest income prospectively over the life of the FDIC loss sharing agreements. For covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20, as the loan discount recorded as of the acquisition date was accreted into income, a reduction of the related indemnification asset was recorded as a reduction in non-interest income. Increases in expected reimbursements from the FDIC are recognized in non-interest income in the same period that the allowance for credit losses for the related loans is recognized.

 

81


Over the life of the acquired loans that are accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation continues to estimate cash flows expected to be collected on individual loans or on pools of loans sharing common risk characteristics. The Corporation evaluates at each balance sheet date whether the present value of its loans determined using the effective interest rates has decreased based on revised estimated cash flows and if so, recognizes a provision for loan loss in its consolidated statement of operations and an allowance for loan losses in its consolidated statement of financial condition. For any increases in cash flows expected to be collected from borrowers, the Corporation adjusts the amount of accretable yield recognized on the loans on a prospective basis over the pool’s remaining life.

The evaluation of estimated cash flows expected to be collected subsequent to acquisition on loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 and inherent losses on loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-20 require the continued usage of key assumptions and estimates. Given the current economic environment, the Corporation must apply judgment to develop its estimates of cash flows considering the impact of home price and property value changes, changing loss severities and prepayment speeds. Decreases in the expected cash flows for ASC Subtopic 310-30 loans and decreases in the net realizable value of ASC Subtopic 310-20 loans will generally result in a charge to the provision for credit losses resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses. These estimates are particularly sensitive to changes in loan credit quality.

The amount that the Corporation realizes on the covered loans and related indemnification assets could differ materially from the carrying value reflected in these financial statements, based upon the timing and amount of collections on the acquired loans in future periods. The Corporation’s losses on these assets may be mitigated to the extent covered under the specific terms and provisions of the loss share agreements.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis, and attributable to operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or paid. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period when the changes are enacted.

The calculation of periodic income taxes is complex and requires the use of estimates and judgments. The Corporation has recorded two accruals for income taxes: (i) the net estimated amount currently due or to be received from taxing jurisdictions, including any reserve for potential examination issues, and (ii) a deferred income tax that represents the estimated impact of temporary differences between how the Corporation recognizes assets and liabilities under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), and how such assets and liabilities are recognized under the tax code. Differences in the actual outcome of these future tax consequences could impact the Corporation’s financial position or its results of operations. In estimating taxes, management assesses the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into consideration statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance.

A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets, including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The realization of deferred tax assets requires the consideration of all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax-planning strategies.

Management evaluates the realization of the deferred tax asset by taxing jurisdiction, the US mainland operations are evaluated as a whole since a consolidated income tax return is filed, on the other hand the deferred tax asset related to the Puerto Rico operations is evaluated on an entity by entity basis, since no consolidation is allowed in the income tax filing. Accordingly this evaluation is composed of three major components, US mainland operations, Puerto Rico banking operations and Holding Company.

 

82


For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets in the U.S. mainland operations management evaluates and weights all available positive and negative evidence. The Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations are no longer in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended December 31, 2014 taking into account taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences (“adjusted book income”). This represents positive evidence within management’s evaluation. However, the book income for the years 2013 and 2014 was significantly impacted by a reversal of the loan loss provision due to the improved credit quality of the loan portfolios. The U.S. mainland operations did not report taxable income for the years 2011, 2012 and 2013, although it did report taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2014. Also, the normalized future performance of this operation is uncertain to estimate since the business operation has changed after the sale of three regions and the restructure of administrative functions has not been completed. The lack of a sustained level of taxable income together with the uncertainties regarding the estimate of future normalized level of profitability and cost savings related to the restructure represents strong negative evidence within management’s evaluation. This determination is updated each quarter and adjusted as any changes arise. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets related to the U.S. mainland operations, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740. If the Corporation is able to meet its operating targets in the U.S. and the results of the reorganization yield the expected results, this would be considered positive evidence within management’s evaluation which could outweigh the negative evidence and result in the realization of a portion of the fully reserved deferred tax asset recorded at PCB.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s net deferred tax assets related to its Puerto Rico operations amounted to $812 million. The Corporation’s Puerto Rico Banking operation is not in a cumulative loss position and has sustained profitability for the three year period ended December 31, 2014, exclusive of the loss generated on the sales of non performing assets that took place in 2013 which is not a continuing condition of the operations. This is considered a strong piece of objectively verifiable positive evidence that out weights any negative evidence considered by management in the evaluation of the realization of the deferred tax asset. Based on this evidence, the Corporation has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico operations will be realized.

The Holding Company operation is not in a cumulative loss position for the three year period ended December 31, 2014. However, the interest expense under the newly issued $450 million subordinated notes which partially funded the repayment of TARP funds in 2014, bearing interest at 7%, will be tax deductible, and contrary to the interest expense payable on the note issued to the U.S. Treasury under TARP. Based on this new fact pattern the Holding Company is expecting to have losses for income tax purposes exclusive of reversing temporary differences. Since as required by ASC 740 the historical information should be supplemented by all currently available information about future years, the expected losses in future years is considered by management a strong negative evidence that suggests that income in future years will be insufficient to support the realization of all deferred tax asset. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Holding Company will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740.

Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns. The Code provides a dividends-received deduction of 100% on dividends received from “controlled” subsidiaries subject to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations.

Changes in the Corporation’s estimates can occur due to changes in tax rates, new business strategies, newly enacted guidance, and resolution of issues with taxing authorities regarding previously taken tax positions. Such changes could affect the amount of accrued taxes. The current income tax payable for 2014 has been paid during the year in accordance with estimated tax payments rules. Any remaining payment will not have any significant impact on liquidity and capital resources.

The valuation of deferred tax assets requires judgment in assessing the likely future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns and future profitability. The accounting for deferred tax consequences represents management’s best estimate of those future events. Changes in management’s current estimates, due to unanticipated events, could have a material impact on the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Corporation establishes tax liabilities or reduces tax assets for uncertain tax positions when, despite its assessment that its tax return positions are appropriate and supportable under local tax law, the Corporation believes it may not succeed in realizing the tax benefit of certain positions if challenged. In evaluating a tax position, the Corporation determines whether it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolution of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits of the position. The Corporation’s estimate of the ultimate tax liability contains assumptions based on past experiences, and judgments about potential actions by taxing jurisdictions as well as judgments about the likely outcome of issues that have been raised by taxing jurisdictions. The tax position is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Corporation evaluates these uncertain tax positions each quarter and adjusts the related tax liabilities or assets in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit or the expiration of a statute of limitations. The Corporation believes the estimates and assumptions used to support its evaluation of uncertain tax positions are reasonable.

 

83


The amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including accrued interest, at December 31, 2014 amounted to $9.8 million. Refer to Note 43 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on this subject matter. The Corporation anticipates a reduction in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, which could amount to approximately $6.7 million.

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the statutes of limitation, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions. Although the outcome of tax audits is uncertain, the Corporation believes that adequate amounts of tax, interest and penalties have been provided for any adjustments that are expected to result from open years. From time to time, the Corporation is audited by various federal, state and local authorities regarding income tax matters. Although management believes its approach in determining the appropriate tax treatment is supportable and in accordance with the accounting standards, it is possible that the final tax authority will take a tax position that is different than the tax position reflected in the Corporation’s income tax provision and other tax reserves. As each audit is conducted, adjustments, if any, are appropriately recorded in the consolidated financial statement in the period determined. Such differences could have an adverse effect on the Corporation’s income tax provision or benefit, or other tax reserves, in the reporting period in which such determination is made and, consequently, on the Corporation’s results of operations, financial position and / or cash flows for such period.

Goodwill

The Corporation’s goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets having an indefinite useful life are tested for impairment. Intangibles with indefinite lives are evaluated for impairment at least annually, and on a more frequent basis, if events or circumstances indicate impairment could have taken place. Such events could include, among others, a significant adverse change in the business climate, an adverse action by a regulator, an unanticipated change in the competitive environment and a decision to change the operations or dispose of a reporting unit.

Under applicable accounting standards, goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step must be performed. The second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated possible impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, which is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and identifiable intangibles (including any unrecognized intangible assets, such as unrecognized core deposits and trademark) as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The Corporation estimates the fair values of the assets and liabilities of a reporting unit, consistent with the requirements of the fair value measurements accounting standard, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of the assets and liabilities reflects market conditions, thus volatility in prices could have a material impact on the determination of the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill at the impairment test date. The adjustments to measure the assets, liabilities and intangibles at fair value are for the purpose of measuring the implied fair value of goodwill and such adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated statement of condition. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted under applicable accounting standards.

At December 31, 2014, goodwill amounted to $466 million. Note 20 to the consolidated financial statements provides the assignment of goodwill by reportable segment and the Corporate group.

The Corporation performed the annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the entire organization during the third quarter of 2014 using July 31, 2014 as the annual evaluation date. The reporting units utilized for this evaluation were those that are one level below the business segments, which are the legal entities within the reportable segment. The Corporation assigns goodwill to the reporting units when carrying out a business combination.

 

84


In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the Corporation generally uses a combination of methods, including market price multiples of comparable companies and transactions, as well as discounted cash flow analysis. Management evaluates the particular circumstances of each reporting unit in order to determine the most appropriate valuation methodology. The Corporation evaluates the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances. Elements considered include current market and economic conditions, developments in specific lines of business, and any particular features in the individual reporting units.

The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that are used as part of these evaluations include:

 

   

a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business, location and size;

 

   

a selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions;

 

   

the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of equity;

 

   

the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and

 

   

the market growth and new business assumptions.

For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuations were determined by calculating average price multiples of relevant value drivers from a group of companies that are comparable to the reporting unit being analyzed and applying those price multiples to the value drivers of the reporting unit. Multiples used are minority based multiples and thus, no control premium adjustment is made to the comparable companies market multiples. While the market price multiple is not an assumption, a presumption that it provides an indicator of the value of the reporting unit is inherent in the valuation. The determination of the market comparables also involves a degree of judgment.

For purposes of the discounted cash flows (“DCF”) approach, the valuation is based on estimated future cash flows. The financial projections used in the DCF valuation analysis for each reporting unit are based on the most recent (as of the valuation date) financial projections presented to the Corporation’s Asset / Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”). The growth assumptions included in these projections are based on management’s expectations for each reporting unit’s financial prospects considering economic and industry conditions as well as particular plans of each entity (i.e. restructuring plans, de-leveraging, etc.). The cost of equity used to discount the cash flows was calculated using the Ibbotson Build-Up Method and ranged from 12.15% to 16.83% for the 2014 analysis. The Ibbotson Build-Up Method builds up a cost of equity starting with the rate of return of a “risk-free” asset (20-year U.S. Treasury note) and adds to it additional risk elements such as equity risk premium, size premium and industry risk premium. The resulting discount rates were analyzed in terms of reasonability given the current market conditions and adjustments were made when necessary.

For BPNA reporting unit, the average estimated fair value calculated in Step 1, using all valuation methodologies exceeded BPNA’s equity value by approximately $205 million in the July 31, 2014 annual test. Accordingly, there is no indication of impairment of goodwill recorded in BPNA at July 31, 2014 and there is no need for a Step 2 analysis. BPNA failed Step 1 in the annual test as of July 31, 2013 requiring the completion of Step 2. The results of the Step 2 indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value at July 31, 2013 resulting in no goodwill impairment.

For the BPPR reporting unit, the average estimated fair value calculated in Step 1 using all valuation methodologies exceeded BPPR’s equity value by approximately $337 million in the July 31, 2014 annual test as compared with approximately $387 million at July 31, 2013. This result indicates there would be no indication of impairment on the goodwill recorded in BPPR at July 31, 2014. The goodwill balance of BPPR and BPNA, as legal entities, represented approximately 95% of the Corporation’s total goodwill balance as of the July 31, 2014 valuation date.

Furthermore, as part of the analyses, management performed a reconciliation of the aggregate fair values determined for the reporting units to the market capitalization of Popular, Inc. concluding that the fair value results determined for the reporting units in the July 31, 2014 annual assessment were reasonable.

The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regard to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future

 

85


impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporation’s results of operations and the reporting units where the goodwill is recorded. Declines in the Corporation’s market capitalization could increase the risk of goodwill impairment in the future. Management monitors events or changes in circumstances between annual tests to determine if these events or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, other than goodwill, the Corporation had $ 6 million of identifiable intangible assets, with indefinite useful lives, mostly associated with E-LOAN’S trademark.

The valuation of the E-LOAN trademark was performed using the “relief-from-royalty” valuation approach. The basis of the “relief-from-royalty” method is that, by virtue of having ownership of the trademark, the Corporation is relieved from having to pay a royalty, usually expressed as a percentage of revenue, for the use of trademark. The main attributes involved in the valuation of this intangible asset include the royalty rate, revenue projections that benefit from the use of this intangible, after-tax royalty savings derived from the ownership of the intangible, and the discount rate to apply to the projected benefits to arrive at the present value of this intangible. Since estimates are an integral part of this trademark impairment analysis, changes in these estimates could have a significant impact on the calculated fair value. There were no impairments recognized during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 related to E-LOAN’s trademark.

Pension and Postretirement Benefit Obligations

The Corporation provides pension and restoration benefit plans for certain employees of various subsidiaries. The Corporation also provides certain health care benefits for retired employees of BPPR. The non-contributory defined pension and benefit restoration plans (“the Plans”) are frozen with regards to all future benefit accruals.

The estimated benefit costs and obligations of the pension and postretirement benefit plans are impacted by the use of subjective assumptions, which can materially affect recorded amounts, including expected returns on plan assets, discount rates, termination rates, retirement rates and health care trend rates. Management applies judgment in the determination of these factors, which normally undergo evaluation against current industry practice and the actual experience of the Corporation. The Corporation uses an independent actuarial firm for assistance in the determination of the pension and postretirement benefit costs and obligations. Detailed information on the Plans and related valuation assumptions are included in Note 37 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Corporation periodically reviews its assumption for the long-term expected return on pension plan assets. The Plans’ assets fair value at December 31, 2014 was $697.2 million. The expected return on plan assets is determined by considering various factors, including a total fund return estimate based on a weighted-average of estimated returns for each asset class in the plan. Asset class returns are estimated using current and projected economic and market factors such as real rates of return, inflation, credit spreads, equity risk premiums and excess return expectations.

As part of the review, the Corporation’s independent consulting actuaries performed an analysis of expected returns based on the plan’s asset allocation at January 1, 2015. This analysis is reviewed by the Corporation and used as a tool to develop expected rates of return, together with other data. This forecast reflects the actuarial firm’s view of expected long-term rates of return for each significant asset class or economic indicator; for example, 8.8% for large cap stocks, 9.0% for small cap stocks, 9.2% for international stocks and 3.8% for aggregate fixed-income securities at January 1, 2015. A range of expected investment returns is developed, and this range relies both on forecasts and on broad-market historical benchmarks for expected returns, correlations, and volatilities for each asset class.

As a consequence of recent reviews, the Corporation decreased its expected return on plan assets for year 2015 to 7.00%. The 7.25% had been used as the expected rate of return in 2014 and 2013. Since the expected return assumption is on a long-term basis, it is not materially impacted by the yearly fluctuations (either positive or negative) in the actual return on assets.

During 2013, the Corporation offered a Lump Sum Distribution to terminated vested participants whose deferred pension has a current value of up to $40 thousand. The acceptance of this offer was voluntary and relieved the Corporation of all future obligations related to the terminated vested participants who accepted the offer.

Pension expense for the Plans amounted to the credit of $8.9 million in 2014. The total pension expense included a credit of $48.9 million for the expected return on assets.

 

86


Pension expense is sensitive to changes in the expected return on assets. For example, decreasing the expected rate of return for 2015 from 7.00% to 6.75% would increase the projected 2015 expense for the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Retirement Plan, the Corporation’s largest plan, by approximately $1.6 million.

If the projected benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets, the Corporation shall recognize a liability equal to the unfunded projected benefit obligation and vice versa, if the fair value of plan assets exceeds the projected benefit obligation, the Corporation recognizes an asset equal to the overfunded projected benefit obligation. This asset or liability may result in a taxable or deductible temporary difference and its tax effect shall be recognized as an income tax expense or benefit which shall be allocated to various components of the financial statements, including other comprehensive income. The determination of the fair value of pension plan obligations involves judgment, and any changes in those estimates could impact the Corporation’s consolidated statement of financial condition. The valuation of pension plan obligations is discussed above. Management believes that the fair value estimates of the pension plan assets are reasonable given the valuation methodologies used to measure the investments at fair value as described in Note 34. Also, the compositions of the plan assets are primarily in equity and debt securities, which have readily determinable quoted market prices.

The Corporation uses the Towers Watson RATE: Link (10/90) Model to discount the expected program cash flows of the plans as a guide in the selection of the discount rate. The Corporation used a discount rate of 3.90% to determine the plans benefit obligation at December 31, 2014, compared with 4.70% at December 31, 2013.

A 50 basis point decrease in the assumed discount rate of 3.90% as of the beginning of 2015 would increase the projected 2015 expense for the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Retirement Plan by approximately $2.5 million. The change would not affect the minimum required contribution to the Plan.

For 2014 the Corporation elected to use the base mortality table reviewed by the Society of Actuaries (“SOA”) (“RP 2014”) adjusted for its own experience using the Tower Watson’s Mortality Credibility Tool. The RP 2014 mortality rates were reduced by 6.5% at all ages. These rates are first applied as of December 31, 2014 for the financial statement obligation disclosure and 2015 expense. The Corporation also adopted, as of December 31, 2014, the future mortality improvement scale released by the SOA (“MP 2014”) without adjustments as the mortality improvement scale. MP 2014 is applied on a generational basis.

The Corporation also provides a postretirement health care benefit plan for certain employees of BPPR. This plan was unfunded (no assets were held by the plan) at December 31, 2014. The Corporation had an accrual for postretirement benefit costs of $161.8 million at December 31, 2014 using a discount rate of 4.00%. Assumed health care trend rates may have significant effects on the amounts reported for the health care plan. Note 37 to the consolidated financial statements provides information on the assumed rates considered by the Corporation and on the sensitivity that a one-percentage point change in the assumed rate may have on specified cost components and the postretirement benefit obligation of the Corporation.

STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS ANALYSIS

Net Interest Income

Net interest income is the principal source of earnings of the Corporation. It is defined as the difference between the revenue generated from earning assets less the interest cost of funding those assets. Net interest income is subject to several risk factors, including market driven events, changes in volumes and repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities, as well as strategic decisions made by the Corporation’s management. Net interest income from the continuing business, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $1,032 million compared to $1,407 million in 2013. During the year 2014, two important events affected the net interest margin of the Corporation: on July 2, 2014, upon repayment of TARP, the Corporation recognized $414.1 million as interest expense from the accelerated amortization of the related discount and deferred costs, and during the third quarter of 2014, $39.2 million was recognized as interest expense associated to the refinancing of $638 million in long term structured repos in the U.S. with a cost of 4.41%, which were replaced with lower cost short term repos of a similar amount. Excluding the impact of these transactions, the net interest income of the Corporation on a taxable equivalent basis was $1,485 million compared to $1,407 million during 2013.

As mentioned above, during 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of its California, Central Florida and Illinois regions, as part of the reorganization of its U.S. operations. The operating results from these regions have been separately presented for all periods as discontinued operations, as required by US GAAP. The 2013 levels and yields have been adjusted to exclude the net interest income and respective volumes of assets and liabilities from the regions sold to present comparable results.

 

87


The average key index rates for the years 2012 through 2014 were as follows:

 

     2014     2013     2012  

Prime rate

     3.25     3.25     3.25

Fed funds rate

     0.08        0.07        0.14   

3-month LIBOR

     0.23        0.27        0.42   

3-month Treasury Bill

     0.05        0.05        0.08   

10-year Treasury

     2.53        2.36        1.74   

FNMA 30-year

     3.41        3.61        3.07   

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis – Non-GAAP financial measure

The interest earning assets include investment securities and loans that are exempt from income tax, principally in Puerto Rico. The main sources of tax-exempt interest income are certain investments in obligations of the U.S. Government, its agencies and sponsored entities, and certain obligations of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its agencies and assets held by the Corporation’s international banking entities. To facilitate the comparison of all interest related to these assets, the interest income has been converted to a taxable equivalent basis, using the applicable statutory income tax rates for each period. The taxable equivalent computation considers the interest expense and other related expense disallowances required by the Puerto Rico tax law. Under this law, the exempt interest can be deducted up to the amount of taxable income. Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management believes that this presentation provides meaningful information since it facilitates the comparison of revenues arising from taxable and exempt sources. Tables 5 and 6 present the net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis and present the impact of the taxable equivalent adjustment to reconcile to the net interest income as presented in the Corporations’ financial statements under U.S.GAAP.

The increase in the taxable equivalent adjustment in 2014 as compared to 2013 is mainly due to a higher yield on loans to the public sector, higher volume of US Treasury and Agency securities and higher exempt income from investments at the international banking entities. Also, the year 2014 reflected higher interest income from exempt mortgage loans due to the reversal of $5.9 million of interest from reverse mortgages at BPPR during the third quarter of 2013 which had been accrued in excess of the amount insured by FHA.

Average outstanding securities balances are based upon amortized cost excluding any unrealized gains or losses on securities available-for-sale. Non-accrual loans have been included in the respective average loans and leases categories. Loan fees collected and costs incurred in the origination of loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest yield. Prepayment penalties, late fees collected and the amortization of premiums / discounts on purchased loans are also included as part of the loan yield. Interest income for the period ended December 31, 2014 included a favorable impact, excluding the discount accretion on covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, of $5.2 million, related to those items, compared to a favorable impact of $12.0 million for the same period in 2013, and $18.4 million in 2012. The $6.8 million reduction from 2013 to 2014 resulted in part from higher amortization of fees, under SFAS 91, from commercial loans.

Table 5 presents the different components of the Corporation’s net interest income, on a taxable equivalent basis, for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared with the same period in 2013, segregated by major categories of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities. Net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis was 3.45% in 2014; excluding the above mentioned non recurring interest expense charges related to the repayment of TARP funds and the refinancing of structured repos in the US, the net interest margin was 4.96% compared to 4.73% and 4.47% for 2013 and 2012, respectively. The main variances are discussed below:

 

   

Higher yield from commercial loans mainly related to new or repriced loans at higher yields, particularly loans to the Puerto Rico public sector.

 

   

A higher yield from mortgage loans due to a reversal of $5.9 million of interest from reverse mortgages at BPPR during the third quarter of 2013 which had been accrued in excess of the amount insured by FHA. Higher volume of consumer loans, mainly auto loans from Popular Auto.

 

88


   

A higher yield from covered loans due to higher expected cash flows which are reflected in the accretable yield to be recognized over the average life of the loans and loan resolutions during 2014; partially offset by the change in the estimated life of certain commercial loans that resulted in an extension of the period in which the accretion of income will be recorded. The positive variance in yield was partially offset by a lower proportion of covered loans to total earning assets. This portfolio, due to its nature, will continue to decline as scheduled payments are received and workout arrangements are made. For a detailed movement of covered loans refer to Note 11 of this Annual Report.

 

   

Lower cost of interest bearing deposits, mainly individual certificates of deposits, IRAs and brokered CDs related to renewal of maturities in a low interest rate environment and management’s efforts to reduce deposit costs.

 

   

A lower cost of borrowings due to the repayment of TARP funds and the refinancing of US structure repos, as described above. Also, during the third quarter of 2013, $233.2 million in senior notes were repaid with an average cost of approximately 7.77%. These positive variances were partially offset by the issuance of $450 million of senior notes at 7%, which were used to partially fund the repayment of TARP.

These positive variances were partially offset by a lower yield from leases due mainly to new activity at lower rates.

Average earning assets increased $156 million when compared with 2013 mainly a higher volume of investment securities and consumer loans primarily related to Popular Auto initiatives, partially offset by a lower volume of construction loans and a reduction in the covered loan portfolio as mentioned above.

Average interest bearing liabilities decreased $864 million in 2014 mainly a lower volume of borrowed money and broker CDs due to lower funding needs, partially offset by higher volume of non maturity deposits. Also, for 2014 there was a higher volume of non interest bearing sources of funds, which helped improve the net interest margin.

Net interest margin, on a taxable equivalent basis, increased 26 basis points to 4.73% in 2013 compared to 4.47% for the year ended December 31, 2012. The taxable equivalent adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $25.7 million from the year 2012. This increase was mainly due to the amendment in 2013 of the Commonwealth’s Internal Revenue Code that increased the corporate marginal income tax rate from 30% to 39% and higher exempt loan volume resulting from approximately $225 million in consumer loans purchased at the end of the second quarter 2012. The main variances in net interest margin for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are discussed below:

 

   

A higher yield from commercial loans due to lower levels of non- performing loans after the bulk sale completed during the first quarter of 2013.

 

   

A higher yield from covered loans due to higher expected cash flows which are reflected in the accretable yield to be recognized over the average life of the loans and loan resolutions during 2013. The positive yield was partially offset by a lower proportion of covered loans to total earning assets.

 

   

Higher yield from consumer loans resulting from the loans purchased at the end of the second quarter 2012.

 

   

Lower cost of interest bearing deposits, mainly individual certificates of deposits, IRAs and brokered CDs related to renewal of maturities in a low interest rate environment and management’s efforts to reduce deposit costs.

 

   

A lower cost of borrowings due to the early repayment of $233.2 million in senior notes during the third quarter of 2013 with an average cost of approximately 7.77% and the cancellation, during June 2012 of $350 million in repurchase agreements with an average cost of 4.36%.

The positive impacts in net interest margin detailed above were partially offset by the following:

 

   

Decrease in the yield of mortgage loans due to acquisitions made, mainly in the US, of high quality loans, which generally carry a lower rate and originations in a lower rate environment. Also during the third quarter of 2013 the Corporation reversed $5.9 million of interest income from reverse mortgages at BPPR, which had been accrued in excess of the amount insured by FHA.

 

   

Lower interest income from investment securities due to reinvestment of cash flows received from mortgage backed securities in lower yielding collateralized mortgage obligations as well as the acquisition of lower yielding agency securities.

 

89


Average earning assets increased $230 million in 2013 when compared with 2012. An increase in mortgage loans, most through acquisitions both in PR and the US was partially offset by reductions in the covered loans portfolio. Investment securities also increased due to reinvestment and current investment strategy to shorten the duration of the portfolio. The decrease in commercial and construction loans can be attributed to the sale of non-performing loans in the first quarter of 2013 and slower origination activity both in Puerto Rico and the U.S.

Average interest bearing liabilities decreased $593 million in 2013 mainly due to lower volumes of borrowed money, broker CDs and individual time deposits. Demand deposits increased by $338 million in 2013 on average when compared to 2012, positively impacting net interest margin.

Table 5 - Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis from Continuing Operations (Non-GAAP)

Years ended December 31,

 

Average Volume   Average Yields / Costs     Interest   Variance
Attributable to
 
2014   2013   Variance   2014   2013   Variance     2014   2013   Variance   Rate   Volume  
(In millions)                 (In thousands)  
$ 1,305     $ 1,036     $ 269       0.32     0.33     (0.01 )%   

Money market investments

  $ 4,224     $ 3,464     $ 760     $ 267     $ 493  
  5,886       5,488       398       2.75       2.95       (0.20  

Investment securities

    162,008       161,868       140       728       (588
  340       417       (77     6.16       6.25       (0.09  

Trading securities

    20,914       26,026       (5,112     (366     (4,746

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  7,531       6,941       590       2.49       2.76       (0.27  

Total money market, investment and trading securities

    187,146       191,358       (4,212     629       (4,841

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
           

Loans:

         
  8,347       8,284       63       5.12       4.97       0.15     

Commercial

    427,314       412,083       15,231       12,116       3,115  
  199       319       (120     6.78       4.73       2.05     

Construction

    13,482       15,076       (1,594     5,210       (6,804
  547       540       7       7.33       8.07       (0.74  

Leasing

    40,135       43,542       (3,407     (4,034     627  
  6,641       6,688       (47     5.40       5.33       0.07     

Mortgage

    358,597       356,739       1,858       4,377       (2,519
  3,861       3,741       120       10.36       10.45       (0.09  

Consumer

    399,941       390,909       9,032       (1,869     10,901  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  19,595       19,572       23       6.33       6.22       0.11     

Sub-total loans

    1,239,469       1,218,349       21,120       15,800       5,320  
  2,771       3,228       (457     10.60       9.32       1.28     

Covered loans

    293,610       300,745       (7,135     33,600       (40,735

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  22,366       22,800       (434     6.85       6.66       0.19     

Total loans

    1,533,079       1,519,094       13,985       49,400       (35,415

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
$ 29,897     $ 29,741     $ 156       5.75     5.75     —    

Total earning assets

  $ 1,720,225     $ 1,710,452     $ 9,773     $ 50,029     $ (40,256

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
           

Interest bearing deposits:

         
$ 4,825     $ 4,658     $ 167       0.32     0.34     (0.02 )%   

NOW and money market [1]

  $ 15,523     $ 15,718     $ (195   $ (629   $ 434  
  6,733       6,585       148       0.22       0.23       (0.01  

Savings

    14,664       15,361       (697     (987     290  
  7,556       7,957       (401     0.99       1.18       (0.19  

Time deposits

    74,900       93,778       (18,878     (12,693     (6,185

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  19,114       19,200       (86     0.55       0.65       (0.10  

Total deposits

    105,087       124,857       (19,770     (14,309     (5,461

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  1,887       2,572       (685     1.49       1.49       —       

Short-term borrowings [2]

    28,123       38,430       (10,307     (5,504     (4,803
  267       515       (248     16.05       15.98       0.07     

TARP funds [3]

    42,906       82,345       (39,439     348       (39,787
  1,360       1,205       155       4.34       4.79       (0.45  

Other medium and long-term debt

    59,034       57,734       1,300       (4,720     6,020  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  22,628       23,492       (864     1.04       1.29       (0.25  

Total interest bearing liabilities

    235,150       303,366       (68,216     (24,185     (44,031

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  5,534       5,371       163          

Non-interest bearing demand deposits

         
  1,735       878       857          

Other sources of funds

         

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
$ 29,897     $ 29,741     $ 156       0.79     1.02     (0.23 )%   

Total source of funds

    235,150       303,366       (68,216     (24,185     (44,031

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

             
        4.96     4.73     0.23  

Adjusted net interest margin/income on a taxable equivalent basis

    1,485,075       1,407,086        77,989      $ 74,214     $ 3,775  
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
        4.71     4.46     0.25  

Adjusted net interest spread

         
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

             
           

Accelerated amortization of TARP discount and BPNA repo refinancing fees

    453,321       —         453,321      
        3.45     4.73     (1.28 )%   

Net interest margin/income on a taxable equivalent basis

    1,031,754       1,407,086       (375,332    
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     
       

Taxable equivalent adjustment

    86,682       62,512       24,170      
             

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     
       

Net interest income

  $ 945,072     $ 1,344,574     $ (399,502    
             

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

90


Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based on the proportion of the change in each category.

 

[1] Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto Rico.
[2] Cost of short-term borrowings excludes the impact of the fees related to PCB repo refinancing. Cost of short-term borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2014 including such fees would have been 3.57%.
[3] Cost of TARP funds excludes the impact of the accelerated amortization. Total cost of TARP funds for the year ended December 31, 2014 including the accelerated amortization of TARP discount would have been 170.91%.

Table 6 - Analysis of Levels & Yields on a Taxable Equivalent Basis from Continuing Operations (Non-GAAP)

Years ended December 31,

 

Average Volume   Average Yields / Costs     Interest   Variance
Attributable to
 
2013   2012   Variance   2013   2012   Variance     2013   2012   Variance   Rate   Volume  
(In millions)                 (In thousands)  
$ 1,036     $ 1,051     $ (15     0.33     0.35     (0.02 )%   

Money market investments

  $ 3,464     $ 3,704     $ (240   $ (129   $ (111
  5,488       5,227       261       2.95       3.48       (0.53  

Investment securities

    161,868       182,094       (20,226     (22,125     1,899  
  417       446       (29     6.25       5.81       0.44     

Trading securities

    26,026       25,909       117       1,882       (1,765

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  6,941       6,724       217       2.76       3.15       (0.39  

Total money market, investment and trading securities

    191,358       211,707       (20,349     (20,372     23  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
           

Loans:

         
  8,284       8,310       (26     4.97       4.86       0.11     

Commercial

    412,083       404,159       7,924       9,169       (1,245
  319       450       (131     4.73       3.46       1.27     

Construction

    15,076       15,556       (480     4,803       (5,283
  540       545       (5     8.07       8.62       (0.55  

Leasing

    43,542       46,960       (3,418     (2,978     (440
  6,688       5,817       871       5.33       5.58       (0.25  

Mortgage

    356,739       324,573       32,166       (14,814     46,980  
  3,741       3,615       126       10.45       10.43       0.02     

Consumer

    390,909       376,843       14,066       3,747       10,319  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  19,572       18,737       835       6.22       6.23       (0.01  

Sub-total loans

    1,218,349       1,168,091       50,258       (73     50,331  
  3,228       4,050       (822     9.32       7.44       1.88     

Covered loans

    300,745       301,441       (696     63,728       (64,424

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  22,800       22,787       13       6.66       6.45       0.21     

Total loans

    1,519,094       1,469,532       49,562       63,655       (14,093

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
$ 29,741     $ 29,511     $ 230       5.75     5.70     0.05  

Total earning assets

  $ 1,710,452     $ 1,681,239     $ 29,213     $ 43,283     $ (14,070

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
           

Interest bearing deposits:

         
$ 4,658     $ 4,449     $ 209       0.34     0.43     (0.09 )%   

NOW and money market [1]

  $ 15,718     $ 19,011     $ (3,293   $ (4,402   $ 1,109  
  6,585       6,386       199       0.23       0.33       (0.10  

Savings

    15,361       21,058       (5,697     (6,185     488  
  7,957       8,835       (878     1.18       1.45       (0.27  

Time deposits

    93,778       127,696       (33,918     (21,842     (12,076

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  19,200       19,670       (470     0.65       0.85       (0.20  

Total deposits

    124,857       167,765       (42,908     (32,429     (10,479

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  2,572       2,564       8       1.49       1.83       (0.34  

Short-term borrowings

    38,430       46,802       (8,372     (7,515     (857
  515       484       31       15.98       15.92       0.06     

TARP funds [2]

    82,345       76,977       5,368       311       5,057  
  1,205        1,367        (162     4.79        5.21        (0.42  

Other medium and long-term debt

    57,734        71,215        (13,481     (2,761     (10,720

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  23,492       24,085       (593     1.29       1.51       (0.22  

Total interest bearing liabilities

    303,366       362,759       (59,393     (42,394     (16,999

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  5,371       5,033       338          

Non-interest bearing demand deposits

         
  878       393       485          

Other sources of funds

         

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
$ 29,741     $ 29,511     $ 230       1.02     1.23     (0.21 )%   

Total source of funds

    303,366       362,759       (59,393     (42,394     (16,999

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

             
        4.73     4.47     0.26  

Net interest margin

         
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

             
           

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis

    1,407,086       1,318,480       88,606     $ 85,677     $ 2,929  
                   

 

 

   

 

 

 
        4.46     4.19     0.27  

Net interest spread

         
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

             
           

Taxable equivalent adjustment

    62,512       36,853       25,659      
             

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     
           

Net interest income

  $ 1,344,574     $ 1,281,627     $ 62,947      
             

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

     

 

91


Note: The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated to volume and rate based on the proportion of the change in each category.

 

[1] Includes interest bearing demand deposits corresponding to certain government entities in Puerto Rico.
[2] Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures held by the U.S. Treasury.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Corporation’s total provision for loan losses for continuing operations totaled $270.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with $606.1 million for 2013, and $397.1 million for 2012.

The provision for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio totaled $224.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $536.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease of $312.7 million from 2013 to 2014 was mostly due to the impact of $318.1 million related to the bulk loan sales completed during 2013. In addition, the provision for 2014 includes an impact of $12.8 million related to certain non-performing and legacy loans sold or transferred to loans held-for-sale as part of the U.S. reorganization, as these loans required a $35.7 million write-down and carried $21.7 million in reserves. Excluding the impact of these sales in 2013 and 2014, the provision would have declined by $7.4 million for year ended December 31, 2014, compared to same period in 2013, reflecting higher reserve releases at BPNA, offset by higher provisions at BPPR. The results for the year ended December 31, 2014 include a $18.7 million reserve release as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models during the second quarter of 2014, compared to a reserve increase of $19.3 million for the same period of 2013 due to enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology. Excluding the $35.7 million write-down mentioned above, net charge-offs for the continuing operations decreased by $49.2 million from the prior year, primarily driven by a reduction of $54.3 million in commercial net charge-offs.

The provision for the Puerto Rico non-covered portfolio amounted to $242.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $547.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The decrease of $305.0 million was predominantly driven by the above mentioned impact of $318.1 million related to the bulk loan sales completed during 2013. Excluding the bulk sales impact, the provision increased by $13.1 million mainly led by environmental factors due to challenging economic conditions that persist in Puerto Rico and the effect of downgrades in the internal risk ratings of certain large corporate and public sector relationships, in part offset by a $14.9 million reserve release as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models during the second quarter of 2014. Net charge-offs decreased by $23.3 million from the previous year mostly driven by lower commercial net charge-offs of $46.2 million, in part offset by an increase of $21.1 million in the consumer portfolio net charge-offs, which for 2013 included a recovery of $8.9 million associated with the sale of a portfolio of previously charged-off loans.

The U.S. continuing operations recorded a provision release of $18.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to a release of $11.2 million for the same period in 2013. The provision for 2014 includes the previously mentioned impact of $12.8 million related to loan sales or loans transferred to loans-held-for sale. Excluding the effect of these transactions, the provision for 2014 would have amounted to a release of $31.7 million, or $20.5 million higher release than in 2013. This reversal of provision was

 

92


prompted by improved credit quality trends, the de-risking of the U.S. portfolio and the effect of a $3.8 million reserve release as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models during the second quarter of 2014. Net charge-offs decreased by $25.9 million from the previous year driven by improvements in all portfolios.

The provision for the covered portfolio was $46.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $69.4 million for same period of the previous year. This decrease of $23.3 million was due to lower impairment losses on commercial loan pools accounted for under ASC 310-30 and the impact of a $7.5 million reserve increase related to the enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology implemented during the second quarter of 2013. These positive variances were offset by the $0.8 million reserve increase recorded during the second quarter of 2014, as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models.

The provision for loan losses for the non-covered loan portfolio increased $214.5 million from 2012 to 2013. This increase was mostly due to the $318.1 million impact related to the bulk loan sales completed during 2013, as mentioned above. Excluding the impact of these sales, the provision for loan losses for the continuing operations declined by $103.6 million, mainly due to continued credit quality improvements evidenced by a decline in net charge-offs of $129.7 million, partly offset by the enhancements made to the allowance for loan losses implemented during the second quarter of 2013, which resulted in a reserve increase of $11.8 million for the non-covered portfolio. The results for 2012 reflect the impact of a reduction in the reserve of $24.8 million due to certain enhancements to the methodology implemented during the first quarter of 2012.

The provision for the Puerto Rico non-covered portfolio declined by $52.3 million for 2013 compared to 2012, excluding the impact of the bulk non-performing assets sales. The reduction was the result of improved credit metrics, partly offset by the impact of the enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology which resulted in reserve increases of $22.6 million. Also, BPPR recorded a recovery of $8.9 million associated with the sale of a portfolio of previously charged-off credit cards and personal loans during 2013.

The U.S. continuing operations recorded a reserve release of $11.2 million for 2013, compared to a provision of $40.2 million for 2012, a decrease of $51.4 million. The reserve release was due to improved credit performance and the impact of the enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology implemented during 2013, which reduced reserve levels by $10.8 million.

The provision for covered loans totaled $69.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared with $74.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, reflecting a decrease of $5.4 million, mostly driven by lower impairment losses, in part offset by $7.5 million increase related to the enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology.

Refer to the Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality sections of this MD&A for a detailed analysis of net charge-offs, non-performing assets, the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics.

 

93


Non-Interest Income

The following tables present the breakdown of non-interest income and mortgage banking activities by major categories for the past five years.

Table 7 - Non-Interest Income

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

Service charges on deposit accounts

   $ 158,637     $ 162,870     $ 171,226     $ 171,218     $ 180,816  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other service fees:

Debit card fees

  43,146     41,912     43,528     56,439     97,597  

Credit card fees

  67,639     65,727     61,071     52,226     85,413  

Insurance fees

  54,158     52,309     51,363     51,596     47,052  

Processing fees

  —       —       6,330     6,839     45,055  

Sale and administration of investment products

  27,711     35,272     37,766     34,388     37,783  

Trust fees

  18,209     17,285     16,353     15,333     14,217  

Check cashing fees

  123     191     244     339     408  

Other fees

  14,279     16,655     15,860     16,738     18,931  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other services fees

  225,265     229,351     232,515     233,898     346,456  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Mortgage banking activities

  30,615     71,657     84,771     (4,505   16,153  

Net (loss) gain on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities

  (870   7,966     (1,707   10,844     3,992  

Trading account profit (loss)

  4,358     (13,483   4,478     48,098     33,017  

Net gain (loss) on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

  40,591     (52,708   (29,414   4,054     5,101  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  (40,629   (37,054   (21,198   (33,068   (72,013

FDIC loss share (expense) income

  (103,024   (82,051   (56,211   66,791     (25,751

Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument

  —       —       —       8,323     42,555  

Gain on sale of processing and technology business

  —       —       —       —       640,802  

Other operating income

  71,572     504,465     127,029     98,189     108,279  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

$ 386,515   $ 791,013   $ 511,489   $ 603,842   $ 1,279,407  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Table 8 - Mortgage Banking Activities

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments:

          

Mortgage servicing fees

   $ 41,761     $ 45,465     $ 48,156     $ 49,136     $ 47,636  

Mortgage servicing rights fair value adjustments

     (24,683     (11,403     (17,406     (37,061     (22,860
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments

  17,078     34,062     30,750     12,075     24,776  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation on loans held-for-sale

  31,213     26,719     76,181     25,621     7,990  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Trading account (loss) profit:

Unrealized (losses) gains on outstanding derivative positions

  (726   746     304     956     (2,613

Realized (losses) gains on closed derivative positions

  (16,950   10,130     (22,464   (43,157   (14,000
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total trading account (loss) profit

  (17,676   10,876     (22,160   (42,201   (16,613
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total mortgage banking activities

$ 30,615   $ 71,657   $ 84,771   $ (4,505 $ 16,153  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014, non-interest income decreased by $404.5 million when compared with the previous year. The FDIC indemnity asset amortization for the year 2014 included a benefit of approximately $12.5 million to reverse the impact of

 

94


accelerated amortization expense recorded in prior periods. This amount will be recognized as expense over the remaining portion of the loss sharing agreement that expires in the quarter ending June 30, 2015. Excluding the impact of the $12.5 million FDIC indemnity asset amortization adjustment during 2014 and the significant events during 2013 of $357.2 million that includes the impact of the NPA’s sales and the impact of EVERTEC’s public offerings during 2013, non-interest income decreased by $61.5 million principally due to the following. Refer to tables 72 and 73 for non-GAAP reconciliations for the years 2014 and 2013.

 

   

Lower income from mortgage banking activities by $41.0 million mainly due to an unfavorable variance in the realized (losses) / gains on closed derivatives positions, in addition to an unfavorable variance in the fair value adjustment of mortgage servicing rights. Refer to Table 8 for additional details on mortgage banking activities;

 

   

Higher FDIC loss share expense by $33.5 million, principally due to higher amortization of the indemnification asset due to a decrease in expected losses, and lower mirror accounting income on credit impairment losses; partially offset by lower unfavorable valuation adjustment on the true up payment obligation and higher mirror accounting income on reimbursable expenses. Refer to Table 2 for a breakdown of FDIC loss share (expense) income by major categories;

 

   

Higher provision for indemnity reserves by $17.3 million, excluding the provision of $13.7 million related to the bulk sales of NPA’s during 2013, due to reserves for loans sold with credit recourse, mainly at BPPR;

 

   

Lower service charges on deposit accounts of $4.2 million due to lower volume of overdrafts and other transaction fees; and

 

   

Lower other service fees by $4.1 million due to a decline in the market value of assets under management, mainly Puerto Rico Government obligations and closed-end funds, which drive lower investment management fees and mutual funds administration fees.

These unfavorable variances were partially offset by the following:

 

   

Higher net gains on sale of loans, net of valuation adjustments by $26.4 million, excluding the impact of the NPAs sales mentioned above, mostly driven by BPNA individual sales of non-performing commercial loans during 2014; and

 

   

A favorable variance in the trading account profit / (loss) caption of $17.8 million mainly at the BPPR segment due to inventory positions mark downs in 2013 (mostly Puerto Rico government obligations and closed-end funds), and a favorable variance in the realized and unrealized gains / (losses) on outstanding mortgage-backed securities, mainly market driven at BPPR.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, non-interest income increased by $279.5 million when compared to 2012. Excluding the impact of the significant events during 2013 mentioned above, non-interest income decreased by $77.6 million principally due to the following:

 

   

Lower other operating income by $52.9 million mostly due to lower net earnings on investments under the equity method mainly due to income of $31.6 million recorded in 2012 related to the Corporation’s proportionate share of a benefit from a tax grant received by EVERTEC from the Puerto Rico government;

 

   

Higher FDIC loss share expense by $25.8 million, principally due to higher amortization of the FDIC loss share asset due to a decrease in expected losses, higher mirror accounting on recoveries on covered loans, including rental income on OREOs, and the impact of fair value adjustments in the true-up payment obligation, partially offset by higher mirror accounting on credit impairment losses and reimbursable loan related expenses on covered loans;

 

   

Unfavorable variance in trading account profit / (loss) by $18.0 million mainly driven by higher unrealized losses on outstanding mortgage-backed securities and higher losses on Puerto Rico government obligations and closed-end funds;

 

   

Lower mortgage banking activities by $13.1 million due to lower gains on sale of loans driven by lower market prices, partially offset by higher trading account related to derivative positions and a favorable variance in the fair value adjustment of mortgage servicing rights; and

 

   

Lower service charges on deposit accounts by $8.4 million, mainly driven by lower commercial account fees and non-sufficient funds and overdraft fees.

These unfavorable variances were partially offset by a favorable variance in net gains on sale of loans, net of valuation adjustments by $42.0 million driven mostly by valuation adjustments of $27.3 million on commercial and construction loans held-for-sale at the BPPR segment during 2012 as a result of updated appraisals and market indicators.

 

95


Operating Expenses

Table 9 provides a breakdown of operating expenses by major categories.

Table 9 - Operating Expenses

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

Personnel costs:

          

Salaries

   $ 281,252     $ 276,072     $ 279,590     $ 282,460     $ 330,073  

Commissions, incentives and other bonuses

     59,138       57,060       51,320       40,987       50,364  

Pension, postretirement and medical insurance

     32,416       55,106       64,325       59,671       58,956  

Other personnel costs, including payroll taxes

     45,873       40,459       39,098       38,797       44,354  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total personnel costs

  418,679     428,697     434,333     421,915     483,747  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net occupancy expenses

  86,707     86,651     84,687     84,966     98,019  

Equipment expenses

  48,917     46,028     43,618     42,238     84,078  

Other taxes

  56,918     58,028     49,844     51,628     50,342  

Professional fees:

Collections, appraisals and other credit related fees

  26,257     32,727     41,029     30,261     23,149  

Programming, processing and other technology services

  173,814     174,921     169,927     164,716     59,192  

Other professional fees

  81,984     70,479     60,052     61,248     89,841  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total professional fees

  282,055     278,127     271,008     256,225     172,182  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Communications

  25,684     25,385     25,687     25,343     37,219  

Business promotion

  54,016     59,453     60,784     53,200     45,305  

FDIC deposit insurance

  40,307     56,728     82,065     87,942     60,276  

Loss (gain) on early extinguishment of debt

  532     3,388     25,196     8,693     38,787  

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

  49,611     79,658     28,823     20,900     43,399  

Other operating expenses:

Credit and debit card processing, volume, interchange and other expenses

  21,588     19,901     18,789     16,552     39,636  

Transportation and travel

  6,474     6,973     6,284     6,753     7,503  

Printing and supplies

  3,732     3,185     4,195     4,805     8,823  

Operational losses

  18,543     17,954     23,681     12,682     18,494  

All other

  45,036     43,863     47,834     42,276     66,153  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other operating expenses

  95,373     91,876     100,783     83,068     140,609  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amortization of intangibles

  8,160     7,971     8,161     7,742     7,263  

Restructuring costs

  26,725     —       —       —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

$ 1,193,684   $ 1,221,990   $ 1,214,989   $ 1,143,860   $ 1,261,226  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Personnel costs to average assets

  1.19   1.18   1.20   1.11   1.26

Operating expenses to average assets

  3.39     3.37     3.35     3.00     3.29  

Employees (full-time equivalent)

  7,752     8,059     8,072     8,329     8,277  

Average assets per employee (in millions)

$ 4.54   $ 4.50   $ 4.49   $ 4.57   $ 4.64  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 decreased by $28.3 million, or 2%, when compared with the year ended December 31, 2013. Operating expenses for 2014 included restructuring charges related to the U.S. operations for $26.7 million, executive compensation costs for $3.0 million, lease cancellation costs for $1.9 million and early debt extinguishment costs for $532 thousand. For the year 2013, operating expenses included $37.0 million in OREO expenses related to the bulk sale of non-performing assets and $1.1 million in professional services mainly related to EVERTEC’s public offerings. Excluding the impact of the aforementioned significant events, detailed in tables 72 and 73, operating expenses decreased by $22.3 million compared with the year ended December 31, 2013, driven primarily by:

 

   

Lower FDIC deposit insurance by $16.4 million, reflecting lower levels of high risk assets;

 

96


   

A decrease in personnel costs by $13.0 million, mainly due to lower pension, postretirement and medical services due to changes to actuarial assumptions effective for the year 2014 resulting in lower amortization of pension costs and lower medical life insurance expense; partially offset by higher salaries and other personnel costs; and

 

   

Lower loss on extinguishment of debt by $3.4 million, mainly due to the early cancellation of medium term notes during 2013.

The above variances were partially offset by:

 

   

An increase in OREO expenses by $7.0 million mainly due to due to higher write downs on OREO properties, offset by higher gains on sales of mainly commercial and construction properties; and

 

   

Higher professional fees by $5.0 million, mainly at BPPR due to higher legal fees mostly as a result of the FDIC arbitration proceedings and other corporate matters.

Operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 increased by $7.0 million, or 6%, when compared with the year ended December 31, 2012. Excluding the impact of the significant events detailed in table 73 and discussed above, operating expenses decreased by $31.1 million compared with the year ended December 31, 2012, driven primarily by:

 

   

Lower FDIC deposit insurance by $25.3 million, which includes a credit of $11.3 million received from the FDIC during the first quarter, mainly driven by revisions in the deposit insurance premium calculation, lower levels of high risk assets and efficiencies achieved from the internal reorganization in which Popular Mortgage was merged into BPPR, completed at the end of 2012;

 

   

A decrease in loss on extinguishment of debt by $21.8 million as a result of prepayment expense of $25 million paid in 2012 related to the early termination of repurchase agreements of $350 million; and

 

   

Lower other operating expenses by $8.9 million mainly due to lower operational losses.

The above variances were partially offset by:

 

   

An increase in OREO expenses by $13.8 million mainly due to the higher valuation write downs consisting primarily of covered assets which are subject to 80% reimbursement from the FDIC;

 

   

Higher other taxes by $8.2 million related to the new PR gross receipts tax enacted in June 2013, partially offset by lower personal property tax and lower income subject to municipal tax; and

 

   

An increase in professional fees by $6.0 million as a result of higher professional services, legal fees and attorneys fees, mainly in the BPPR reportable segment.

INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense amounted to $58.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with an income tax benefit of $251.3 million for the previous year. The increase in income tax expense was primarily due to the recognition during the year 2013 of a tax benefit of $197.5 million and a corresponding increase in the net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico operations as a result of the increase in the statutory corporate income tax rate from 30% to 39% introduced as part of the amendments to the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012. In addition, during 2013 the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit due to the loss generated on the Puerto Rico operations by the sales of non-performing assets net of the gain realized on the sale of a portion of EVERTEC’s shares which was taxable at a preferential tax rate according to Act Number 73 of May 28, 2008 known as “Economic Incentives Act for the Development of Puerto Rico”.

On July 1, 2014, the Government of Puerto Rico approved certain amendments to the Internal Revenue Code, which, among other things, changed the income tax rate for capital gains from 15% to 20%. As a result, the Corporation recognized an income tax expense of $20.0 million mainly related to the deferred tax liability associated with the portfolio acquired from Westernbank.

During the second quarter of 2014 the Corporation entered into a Closing Agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury. The Agreement, among other matters, was related to the income tax treatment of certain charge-offs related to the loans acquired from Westernbank as part of the FDIC assisted transaction in the year 2010. As a result of the Agreement, the Corporation recorded a tax benefit of $23.4 million due to a reduction in the deferred tax liability associated with the Westernbank loan portfolio. Additionally, in connection with this Closing, the Corporation made an estimated tax payment of $45 million which will be used as a credit to offset future income tax liabilities.

 

97


In addition, as further detailed below, during 2014 an initial valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset of approximately $8.0 million was recorded at the Holding Company, due to the difference in the tax treatment of the interest expense related to the TARP funds and the newly issued $450 million of senior notes, bearing interest at 7%.

Excluding the impact of the events listed above, the income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $51.1 million, compared to $89.4 million for 2013. The decrease in income taxes was mainly due to a higher level of exempt income, higher deductible interest expense related to the issuance of the $450 million Senior Notes as compared to the non-deductible interest related to the TARP funds and a lower income tax expense related to charge-offs of the covered portfolio, after the closing agreement with the PR Treasury Department.

Income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2013 was $251.3 million, compared with an income tax benefit of $26.4 million for 2012. The increase in income tax benefit was primarily due to the recognition during 2013 of a tax benefit of $197.5 million as a result of the change in the statutory corporate income tax rate from 30% to 39% and the loss generated on the sale of non-performing assets as explained above., as compared with an income tax benefit of $72.9 million during 2012 related to the reduction of the deferred tax liability on the estimated gains for tax purposes related to the loans acquired from Westernbank as a result of a Closing Agreement signed by the Corporation and P.R. Department of the Treasury.

The Corporation’s net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2014 amounted to $779 million (net of the valuation allowance of $1.2 billion) compared to $760 million at December 31, 2013 (net of a valuation allowance of $1.3 billion). Note 43 to the consolidated financial statements provides the composition of the net deferred tax assets as of such dates. All of the net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2014 pertain to the Puerto Rico operations. Of the amount related to the U.S. operations, without considering the valuation allowance, $1.1 billion is attributable to net operating losses of such operations.

The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are included in the following table:

Table 10 – Components of Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

 

     2014     2013     2012  

(In thousands)

   Amount     % of pre-tax
income
    Amount     % of pre-tax
income
    Amount     % of pre-tax
income
 

Computed income tax at statutory rates

   $ (51,570     39   $ 135,720       39   $ 65,662       30

Benefit of net tax exempt interest income

     (55,862     43       (36,993     (11     (25,540     (12

Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate [1]

     (21,909     18       (137,793     (40     (78,132     (36

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

     (4,281     3       (32,990     (9     166       —    

Non-deductible expenses [2]

     178,219       (135     32,115       9       23,093       11  

Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions

     (14,178     10       (12,029     (3     (6,034     (3

Initial adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate

     20,048       (16     (197,467     (57     —         —    

Unrecognized tax benefits

     (3,601     3       (7,727     (2     (8,985     (4

Others

     11,413       (9     5,837       2       3,367       2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

$ 58,279     (44 )%  $ (251,327   (72 )%  $ (26,403   (12 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

[1] Includes the impact of the Closing Agreement with the P.R. Treasury signed in June 2012, the tax expense related to a gain on the sale of EVERTEC shares and income from investments in subsidiaries subject to preferential tax rates and the Closing Agreement with the P.R. Treasury signed in 2014.
[2] For the year ended December 31, 2014, includes approximately $161.5 million of amortization of the discount and deferred cost associated with the TARP funds, which are not deductible.

 

98


The Corporations maintains a valuation allowance on its deferred tax asset for the U.S. operations, since in consideration of the requirement of ASC 740 management considered that it is more likely than not that all of this deferred tax asset will not be realized. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets in the U.S. mainland management evaluates and weights all available positive and negative evidence. The Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations are not in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended December 31, 2014 taking into account taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences (“adjusted book income”). This represents positive evidence within management’s evaluation. The book income for the years 2013 and 2014 was significantly impacted by a reversal of the loan loss provision due to the improved credit quality of the loan portfolios. However, the U.S. mainland operations did not report taxable income for the years 2011, 2012 and 2013, although they did report taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2014. Future realization of the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character within the carryforward period available under the tax law. The lack of a sustained level of taxable income together with the uncertainties regarding the estimate of future normalized level of profitability and cost savings related to the restructure represents strong negative evidence within management’s evaluation. This determination is updated each quarter and adjusted as any changes arise. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets related to the U.S. mainland operations, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740. If the Corporation is able to meet its operating targets in the U.S. and the results of the reorganization yield the expected results, this would be considered positive evidence within management’s evaluation which could outweigh the negative evidence and result in the realization of a portion of the fully reserved deferred tax asset recorded at PCB.

The Corporation’s Puerto Rico Banking operation is not in a cumulative loss position and has sustained profitability for the three year period ended December 31, 2014, exclusive of the loss generated on the sales of non-performing assets that took place in 2013 which is not a continuing condition of the operations. This is considered a strong piece of objectively verifiable positive evidence that out weight any negative evidence considered by management in the evaluation of the realization of the deferred tax asset. Based on this evidence and management’s estimate of future taxable income, the Corporation has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico Banking operations will be realized.

The Holding Company operation is not in a cumulative loss position for the three year period ended December 31, 2014. However, the interest expense that will be paid on the newly issued $450 million subordinated notes which partially funded the repayment of TARP funds in 2014, bearing interest at 7%, will be tax deductible in contrast to the interest expense payable on the note issued to the U.S. Treasury under TARP. Based on this new fact pattern the Holding Company is expecting to have losses for income tax purposes exclusive of reversing temporary differences. Since as required by ASC 740 the historical information should be supplemented by all currently available information about future years, the expected losses in future years are considered by management strong negative evidence that suggests that income in future years will be insufficient to support the realization of all deferred tax asset. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Holding Company will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740. Accordingly, a valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset of $17.8 million was recorded during the year 2014.

Refer to Note 43 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on income taxes.

Fourth Quarter Results

The Corporation recognized net income of $48.8 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, compared with a net income of $163.0 million for the same quarter of 2013. The variance in the quarterly results was mainly driven by the after-tax gain of $88.4 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013 from the sale of EVERTEC shares in connection with its public offering.

Net interest income for the fourth quarter of 2014 amounted to $326.9 million, compared with $354.5 million for the fourth quarter of 2013. The decrease in net interest income was primarily due to a decrease of $25.5 million on covered loans interest income, coupled with a decrease of $6.1 million from money market, trading and investment securities. This was partially offset by a decrease of $4.9 million on interest expense from total interest bearing liabilities.

The provision for loan losses amounted to $48.0 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, compared to $58.8 million for the fourth quarter of 2013. The decrease of $10.8 million is mainly at BPPR due to a reserve release from the covered loans portfolio of $3.6 million during the fourth quarter of 2014 compared to a provision of $12.5 million for the same period of 2013, coupled with a decrease of provision from the non-covered portfolio of $10.1 million. This was offset by a $14.4 million reduction in reserve releases at BPNA.

 

99


Non-interest income amounted to $103.4 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, compared with $185.3 million for the same quarter in 2013. The decrease in non-interest income was mainly driven by a $92.4 million gain recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013 from the sale of EVERTEC shares in connection with its public offering, partially offset by a decrease of $18.5 million in FDIC loss share expense.

Operating expenses totaled $330.0 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, compared with $304.6 million for the same quarter in the previous year. The increase is due mainly to restructuring costs of $13.9 million incurred in connection with the reorganization of the U.S. operations, higher OREO expenses of $10.5 million mainly due to higher write-downs on commercial and construction properties, and higher professional fees by $6.2 million. These unfavorable variances were partially offset by lower FDIC deposit insurance of $5.3 million reflecting a lower level of high risk assets.

Income tax expense amounted to $12.5 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2014, compared with $25.2 million for the same quarter of 2013. The decrease in income taxes was mainly due to the higher level of exempt income, higher deductible interest expense related to the issuance of the $450 million Senior Notes as compared to the non-deductible interest related to the TARP funds, and a lower income tax expense related to charge-offs of the covered portfolio as a result of the closing agreement with the PR Treasury Department.

REPORTABLE SEGMENT RESULTS

The Corporation’s reportable segments for managerial reporting purposes consist of Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. A Corporate group has been defined to support the reportable segments. For managerial reporting purposes, the costs incurred by the Corporate group are not allocated to the reportable segments.

For a description of the Corporation’s reportable segments, including additional financial information and the underlying management accounting process, refer to Note 45 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Corporate group reported a net loss of $510.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with net income of $309.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The unfavorable variance at the Corporate group was due to the acceleration of the amortization during 2014 of the discount and deferred costs related to the TARP debt, which amounted to $414.1 million, coupled with the effect of the $412.8 million after tax gain recognized during 2013 as a result of EVERTEC’s public offerings and connected transactions. For details on the EVERTEC transactions refer to Note 34 “Related party transactions with affiliated company/joint venture” to the consolidated financial statements.

Highlights on the earnings results for the reportable segments are discussed below:

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

The Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment’s net income amounted to $274.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with $173.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following:

 

   

higher net interest income by $28.4 million, or 2% mainly impacted by lower interest expense from borrowings by $16.8 million, or lower interest cost by 191 basis points, mainly from the conversion into shares of common stock of $185 million in subordinated notes due to Popular, Inc. during the fourth quarter of 2013. Also, the cost of deposits decreased by $12.3 million or 8 basis points, due to lower levels and rates on IRA deposits and brokered CD’s. The decreases in interest expense were slightly offset by a $0.8 million decrease in interest income;

 

   

lower provision for loan losses by $327.7 million, or 53%, mostly due to the decrease in the provision for loan losses on the non-covered loan portfolio of $304.4, which was mainly due to the incremental provision of $318.0 million related to the bulk sales of non-performing loans during 2013. Excluding the impact of the 2013 bulk sales, the provision for loan losses declined by $9.7 million or 3% to $289.2 million, due to reserve releases from the annual review of the components of the allowance for loan losses;

 

   

higher non-interest income by $1.4 million, or less than 1% mainly due to:

 

   

favorable variance on sale of loans by $62.5 million due to the impact of the bulk sales of non-performing loans completed during 2013; and

 

   

higher trading account profits by $18.0 million due to inventory positions mark downs in 2013 (mostly Puerto Rico government obligations and closed-end funds) and a favorable variance in the realized and unrealized gains/losses on outstanding mortgage-backed securities.

 

 

100


The positive impact in non-interest income detailed above was partially offset by:

 

   

lower mortgage banking activities by $40.8 million due to higher losses on closed derivative positions and unfavorable fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights, offset by higher gains on sale of loans;

 

   

higher FDIC loss share expense by $21.0 million due to higher amortization of the indemnification asset and lower mirror accounting on credit impairment losses and reimbursable expenses, offset by the positive adjustment of $12.5 million related to the amortization of the indemnification asset;

 

   

lower other operating income by $6.5 million due to lower income from equity investments and lower underwriting income from the broker dealer;

 

   

lower other service fees by $4.4 million due to a decline in the market value of assets under management, mainly Puerto Rico Government obligations and closed-end funds, which drive lower investment management fees and mutual funds administration fees.

 

   

lower operating expenses by $58.2 million, or 6%, mainly due to:

 

   

a decrease of $31.0 million in OREO expenses primarily related to the loss of $37.0 million recorded in 2013 on the bulk sale of commercial and single family real estate owned assets, which was partially offset by higher expenses;

 

   

a decrease of $17.3 million in personnel costs due to lower pension and post retirement expenses from changes to actuarial assumptions in pension obligations;

 

   

a decrease of $16.5 million in FDIC deposit insurance due to a lower level of high risk assets.

The favorable variances in operating expenses were partially offset by higher other operating expenses by $10.1 million due to higher provision for unused commitments.

 

   

higher income tax expense by $314.9 million, mainly due to the $197.5 million benefit recognized in 2013 for the increase on the net deferred tax asset due to the change in the corporate tax rate in P.R. from 30% to 39%, as well as the tax benefits derived from the 2013 losses on the bulk sales of non-performing assets.

The main factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results for the year ended December 31, 2013, when compared with 2012, included the following:

 

   

higher net interest income by $61.3 million, or 5% mainly impacted by lower interest expense from deposits by $28.3 million, or lower interest cost by 16 basis points, mainly from individual certificates of deposits, IRA’s and brokered CD’s related to renewal of maturities at lower prevailing rates and to lower volume of deposits. Also, the cost of borrowings decreased by $17.7 million mostly due to the cancellation of $350 million of repurchase agreements in June 2012 that carried a cost of 4.36% and replacing them with lower cost borrowings. In addition, contributing to the positive impact in net interest income was an increase of $26 million in interest from mortgage loans mostly from acquisitions during the first quarter of 2013, partially offset by the reversal during the third quarter of 2013 of $5.9 million in interest from reverse mortgages which had been accrued in excess of the amount insured by FHA. Also the year 2013 reflected an increase of $7.8 million in interest income from consumer loans mostly resulting from an acquisition of $225 million made during the second quarter of 2012 and an increase in the auto loan business, partially offset by lower interest income from credit cards. These positive impacts were partially offset by a reduction of $19.4 million in interest income from investment securities due to the reinvestment of cash flows received from mortgage backed securities in lower yielding collateralized mortgage obligations as well as the acquisitions of lower yielding agency securities. Although yield in covered portfolio increased by 188 basis points, this was offset by lower balances, resulting in interest income of $300.7 million, relatively flat to 2012. The BPPR reportable segment had a net interest margin of 5.32% for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared with 5.06% for 2012;

 

   

higher provision for loan losses by $260.4 million, or 73%, mostly due to the increase in the provision for loan losses on the non-covered loan portfolio of $265.8 million, mainly related to the incremental provision of $148.8 million and $169.2 million recognized in the first and second quarters of 2013, respectively, related to the non-performing loans bulk sales. Excluding the impact of the sales, the provision for loan losses declined by $52.2 million or 19% to $229.4 million, due to positive trends in credit quality offset by the enhancements to the allowance for loan losses framework;

 

101


   

lower non-interest income by $119.5 million, or 30% mainly due to:

 

   

higher FDIC loss share expense by $25.8 million (refer to Table 2 for components of such variance);

 

   

lower other operating income by $20.0 million resulting from lower net earnings from the equity investments in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC by $4.0 million, and gains of $4.7 million and $2.5 million recognized during 2012 from the sale of a bank premise property and the wholesale indirect property and casualty business of Popular Insurance, respectively;

 

   

higher trading account losses by $18.0 million mostly related to higher losses on Puerto Rico government obligations and close-end funds and net realized losses on mortgage backed securities sold as compared to net gains reported for the same period in 2012;

 

   

a decrease of $13.0 million in mortgage banking activities mainly due to lower gain on sale of loans by $49.4 million, mainly for securitization transactions, partially offset by the related closed derivative positions of $32.6 million. Refer to Table 8 for details of Mortgage banking activities.

The negative impact in non-interest income detailed above was partially offset by a favorable variance in valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale by $30.7 million, principally related to $27.3 million in valuation adjustments recorded during the second quarter of 2012 on commercial and construction loans held-for-sale as a result of updated appraisals and market indicators;

 

   

higher operating expenses by $15.3 million, or 2%, mainly due to:

 

   

an increase of $ 50.9 million in OREO expenses primarily related to the loss of $37.0 million on the bulk sale of commercial and single family real estate owned assets during the first quarter of 2013 and to fair value adjustments on commercial properties, mainly covered assets which are subject to 80% reimbursement from the FDIC;

 

   

an increase of $10.2 million in other operating taxes principally related to the gross receipts tax imposed on corporations in Puerto Rico during 2013;

 

   

higher professional fees by $9.5 million mostly due to higher legal, transaction processing and consulting fees;

The unfavorable variances in operating expenses were partially offset by lower FDIC deposit insurance assessment by $25.5 million resulting from revisions in the deposit-insurance premium calculation, lower levels of high risk assets, and savings achieved from the internal reorganization of Popular Mortgage into BPPR during the fourth quarter of 2012; $25.2 million loss in early extinguishment of debt recorded during the second quarter of 2012 related to the cancellation of repurchase agreements; and $5.0 million in personnel costs mainly due to lower net periodic pension costs, medical insurance costs and postretirement health benefits;

 

   

higher income tax benefit by $216.7 million, mainly due to the $197.5 million benefit recognized during the second quarter of 2013 for the increase on the net deferred tax asset due to the change in the corporate tax rate in P.R. from 30% to 39% as compared with a tax benefit of $72.9 million recognized in 2012 resulting from the Closing Agreement with the P.R. Treasury related to the tax treatment of the loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. The increase in income tax benefit was also driven by the loss on the bulk sales of non-performing assets during 2013.

Banco Popular North America

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the reportable segment of Banco Popular North America reported net income of $45.4 million, compared with $76.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. During the third quarter of 2014, BPNA refinanced approximately $638 million in long term structured repos and replaced them with lower cost short-term repos of a similar amount. The fees associated with the refinancing of these repos were $39.7 million, which were recorded as expense during 2014. Also, BPNA sold or entered into agreements to sell $249 million in legacy and classified loans, resulting in a loss of approximately $11.1 million. Restructuring costs associated with BPNA’s reorganization were $26.7 million for the year 2014. Adjusted for these transactions, BPNA recorded a net income from continuing operations of $122.9 million, an increase of $46.9 million when compared to 2013. The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following: The principal factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results included the following:

 

   

higher net interest income by $4.7 million, excluding the impact of the repo refinancing mentioned above, impacted by lower interest expense from deposits by $7.4 million, or a lower cost of 19 basis points, driven by the renewal of maturities from time deposits at lower prevailing rates, and lower interest expense from short term borrowings by $7.3 million, or a lower cost of 91 basis points, due to the repos refinancing mentioned above. This was partially offset by lower income from loans by $6.2 million and lower income from investment securities by $3.6 million, both due mainly to lower levels. The BPNA reportable segment’s net interest margin was 3.10% for 2014 and the adjusted net interest margin was 3.42%, compared with 3.20% for the same period in 2013;

 

102


   

favorable variance in the provision for loan losses by $7.7 million, which includes the previously mentioned impact of $12.8 million related to loan sales or loans transferred to loans held-for-sale. Excluding the effect of these transactions, the provision would have amounted to a release of $31.7 million, or $20.5 million higher release than in 2013. This reversal of provision was prompted by improved credit quality trends, the de-risking of the US portfolio and the effect of a $3.8 million reserve release as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models during the second quarter of 2014;

 

   

higher non-interest income by $28.1 million, or 77%, mostly due to an increase of $30.8 million in gains from sales of loans due to higher volume of sales of non-performing commercial loans during 2014. This was partially offset by a $2.8 million decrease on service charges on deposit accounts; and

 

   

lower operating expenses by $3.2 million, excluding $26.7 million in restructuring charges, due to lower personnel costs by $8.9 million, partially offset by increases of $2.7 million in professional fees and $2.1 million in other operating expenses.

The main factors that contributed to the variance in the financial results for the year ended December 31, 2013, when compared with 2012, included the following:

 

   

higher net interest income by $5.6 million, or 3%, driven by lower interest expense by $13.4 million, largely due to a decrease of $14.5 million on interest expense from deposits due lower costs related to the renewal of maturities from time deposits at lower prevailing rates, as well as lower deposits volume. This was partially offset by lower interest income of $7.9 million, mainly investment securities by $4.3 million due to reinvestment of cash flows from prepayments and maturities in lower yielding investments due to the prevailing interest rate scenarios, and loans by $3.6 million due mainly to lower volumes and yields in the commercial and construction portfolios.

 

   

lower provision for loan losses by $51.3 million, or 128%, principally as a result of a reserve release reflecting improvements in credit quality and economic trends, and the effect of the enhancements to the allowance for loan losses methodology completed during the second quarter of 2013;

 

   

lower non-interest income by $0.9 million, or 2%, mostly due to a decrease in service charges on deposits by $4.5 million related to lower non-sufficient funds and checking fees; partially offset by higher gains on sale of loans by $2.0 million mainly related to commercial and construction loans; lower adjustments to indemnity reserves by $1.6 million; and an increase in gains on sale of securities by $1.3 million mainly due to the loss on the sale of non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations during the fourth quarter of 2012; and

 

   

lower operating expenses by $10.9 million, or 6%, mainly due to a decrease in other operating expenses by $7.8 million and $4.5 million in professional fees, both mainly related to legal settlements recognized during 2012. These favorable variances were partially offset by an increase in net occupancy expenses by $2.0 million due to an adjustment to the outstanding deferred rent liability.

 

103


STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION ANALYSIS

Assets

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s total assets were $33.1 billion, compared with $35.7 billion at December 31, 2013. Refer to the consolidated financial statements included in this 2014 Annual Report for the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Also, refer to the Statistical Summary 2010-2014 in this MD&A for condensed statements of financial condition for the past five years.

Money market, trading and investment securities

Money market investments amounted to $1.8 billion at December 31, 2014 compared with $858 million at the same date in 2013. The increase from the end of 2013 to 2014 was mainly due to an increase at BPPR of $1 billion in time deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

Trading account securities amounted to $139 million at December 31, 2014, compared with $340 million at December 31, 2013. The decrease in trading account securities was at the BPPR segment mainly due to a decrease in mortgage backed securities as loan originations during 2014 were lower compared to 2013. Refer to the Market / Interest Rate Risk section of this MD&A included in the Risk Management section for a table that provides a breakdown of the trading portfolio by security type.

Investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity amounted to $5.4 billion at December 31, 2014 and 2013. Table 11 provides a breakdown of the Corporation’s portfolio of investment securities available-for-sale (“AFS”) and held-to-maturity (“HTM”) on a combined basis at December 31, 2014 and 2013. Notes 9 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements provide additional information with respect to the Corporation’s investment securities AFS and HTM.

Investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity declined by $17 million. CMO’s from federal agencies and mortgage backed securities decreased by $509 million and $231 million, respectively, mainly at BPNA, while US Treasury securities increased by $672 million, mainly at BPPR.

Table 11 - AFS and HTM Securities

 

(In millions)

   2014      2013  

U.S. Treasury securities

   $ 700,154      $ 28,482  

Obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities

     1,724,973        1,629,205  

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

     163,285        180,258  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

     1,910,127        2,418,924  

Mortgage-backed securities

     904,362        1,135,641  

Equity securities

     2,622        4,116  

Other

     12,806        38,670  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total AFS and HTM investment securities

$ 5,418,329   $ 5,435,296  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans

Refer to Table 12 for a breakdown of the Corporation’s loan portfolio, the principal category of earning assets. Loans covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements are presented in a separate line item in Table 12. The risks on covered loans are significantly different as a result of the loss protection provided by the FDIC.

The Corporation’s total loan portfolio amounted to $22.1 billion at December 31, 2014, compared to $24.7 billion at December 31, 2013. Excluding the reclassification of $1.8 billion in loans to discontinued operations, the total loan portfolio decreased by $854 million mainly in the covered loan portfolio due to the continuation of loan resolutions and the normal portfolio run-off and sales of non-performing loans held-in-portfolio mainly at BPNA.

 

104


Table 12 - Loans Ending Balances

 

     At December 31,  

(in thousands)

   2014      2013      2012      2011      2010  

Loans not covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements:

              

Commercial

   $ 8,134,267      $ 10,037,184      $ 9,858,202      $ 9,973,327      $ 10,570,502  

Construction

     251,820        206,084        252,857        239,939        340,556  

Legacy [1]

     80,818        211,135        384,217        648,409        1,013,484  

Lease financing

     564,389        543,761        540,523        548,706        572,787  

Mortgage

     6,502,886        6,681,476        6,078,507        5,518,460        4,524,722  

Consumer

     3,870,271        3,932,226        3,868,886        3,673,755        3,705,984  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

  19,404,451     21,611,866     20,983,192     20,602,596     20,728,035  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements:

Commercial

  1,614,781     1,812,804     2,244,647     2,512,742     2,767,181  

Construction

  70,336     190,127     361,396     546,826     640,492  

Mortgage

  822,986     934,373     1,076,730     1,172,954     1,259,459  

Consumer

  34,559     47,123     73,199     116,181     169,750  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements

  2,542,662     2,984,427     3,755,972     4,348,703     4,836,882  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio

  21,947,113     24,596,293     24,739,164     24,951,299     25,564,917  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-for-sale:

Commercial

  309     603     16,047     25,730     60,528  

Construction

  —       —       78,140     236,045     412,744  

Legacy [1]

  319     —       2,080     468     —    

Mortgage

  100,166     109,823     258,201     100,850     420,666  

Consumer

  5,310     —       —       —       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-for-sale

  106,104     110,426     354,468     363,093     893,938  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans

$ 22,053,217   $ 24,706,719   $ 25,093,632   $ 25,314,392   $ 26,458,855  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA reportable segment.

The explanations for loan portfolio variances discussed below exclude the impact of the covered loans.

Loans held-in-portfolio

Loans held-in-portfolio decreased by $2.2 billion from December 31, 2013. Most of the decrease was at the BPNA segment as a result of the sale of the California, Illinois and Central Florida regions, which included the sale of $1.8 billion in loans and the bulk sales or agreements to sell non-performing loans for a total of approximately $249 million, as well as other sales as part of the regular workout strategy. Refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for further details on the sales of BPNA’s discontinued operations during 2014.

Commercial loans decreased $1.9 billion from December 31, 2013. Most of the decrease is attributed to the sale of the U.S. regions which included the sale of approximately $1.7 billion in commercial loans as well as the bulk sales of non-performing loans at BPNA, which included $178 million in commercial loans.

Construction loans held-in-portfolio increased $46 million from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014, principally at the BPNA segment, which increased by $39 million.

The BPNA legacy portfolio, which is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA reportable segment, declined $130 million, mostly due to the run-off status of this portfolio.

 

105


The mortgage loans held-in-portfolio decreased $179 million. This was reflected mainly at BPNA and was mainly attributed to lower origination volumes as well as the impact of a bulk sale or agreements to sell non-performing mortgage loans amounting to approximately $72 million.

The consumer loans held-in-portfolio decreased $62 million from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014. The decrease was mainly at BPNA by $134 million, due in part to the sale of the U.S. regions which included the sale of approximately $81 million in consumer loans, mainly home equity lines of credit and personal loans. This was partially offset by an increase of $47 million at BPPR, mainly in auto loans originations.

Loans held-for-sale

Loans held-for-sale declined by $4.3 million. The portfolio of mortgage loans held-for-sale decreased $10 million from December 31, 2013. The decrease was mainly at BPPR segment, which decreased by $23 million, mainly due to lower volume of originations for sale in the secondary market, which was offset by an increase in BPNA of $14 million, related to bulk sales of non-performing assets at BPNA to be completed in the first quarter of 2015. The decline in mortgage loans held-for-sale was offset by an increase in consumer loans held-for-sale of $5.3 million at BPNA.

Covered loans

Covered loans were initially recorded at fair value. Their carrying value approximated $2.5 billion at December 31, 2014, of which approximately 64% pertained to commercial loans, 3% to construction loans, 32% to mortgage loans and 1% to consumer loans. Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements presents the carrying amount of the covered loans broken down by major loan type categories and the activity in the carrying amount of loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30. A substantial amount of the covered loans, or approximately $2.4 billion of their carrying value at December 31, 2014, was accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 . The reduction of $384 million from December 31, 2013 was principally the result of loan collections and resolutions, partially offset by the accretion on the loans, which increases their carrying value. Tables 13 and 14 provide the activity in the carrying amount and accretable yield on the covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30. The outstanding accretable yield has been impacted by increases in cash flow expectations on the loan pools based on quarterly revisions of the portfolio. The increase in the accretable yield is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method over the estimated life in each applicable loan pool.

FDIC loss share asset

As indicated in the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A, the Corporation recorded the FDIC loss share asset, measured separately from the covered loans, as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. Based on the accounting guidance in ASC Topic 805, at each reporting date subsequent to the initial recording of the indemnification asset, the Corporation measures the indemnification asset on the same basis as the covered loans and assesses its collectability.

The amount to be ultimately collected for the indemnification asset is dependent upon the performance of the underlying covered assets, the passage of time, claims submitted to the FDIC and the Corporation’s compliance with the terms of the loss sharing agreements. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the FDIC loss share agreements.

Table 13 - Activity in the Carrying Amount of Covered Loans Accounted for Under ASC 310-30

 

     Years ended
December 31,
 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Beginning balance

   $ 2,827,947      $ 3,491,759  

Accretion

     284,472        279,708  

Collections / charge-offs

     (668,247      (943,520
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 2,444,172   $ 2,827,947  

Allowance for loan losses (ALLL)

  (78,846   (93,915
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance, net of ALLL

$ 2,365,326   $ 2,734,032  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

106


Table 14 - Activity in the Accretable Yield on Covered Loans Accounted for Under ASC 310-30

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Beginning balance

   $ 1,309,205      $ 1,451,669  

Accretion [1]

     (284,472      (279,708

Change in expected cash flows

     246,604        137,244  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 1,271,337   $ 1,309,205  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Positive to earnings, which is included in interest income.

The loan discount accretion in 2014 and 2013, which is recorded in interest income, resulted principally from accelerated cash expectations and loan resolutions, for some of which the Corporation had estimated significantly higher losses. These cash flows resulted in a faster recognition of the corresponding loan pool’s accretable yield.

Although the reduction in estimated loan losses increases the accretable yield to be recognized over the life of the loans, it also has the effect of lowering the realizable value of the loss share asset since the Corporation would receive lower FDIC payments under the loss share agreements.

Table 15 sets forth the activity in the FDIC loss share asset for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Table 15 - Activity of Loss Share Asset

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Balance at beginning of year

   $ 948,608      $ 1,399,098      $ 1,915,128  

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

     (189,959      (161,635      (129,676

Reversal of accelerated amortization

     12,492        —          —    

Credit impairment losses to be covered under loss sharing agreements

     32,038        60,454        58,187  

Reimbursable expenses

     58,117        50,985        30,771  

Decrease due to reciprocal accounting on amortization of contingent liability on unfunded commitments

     —          (473      (969

Payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements

     (269,397      (396,223      (462,016

Other adjustments attributable to FDIC loss sharing agreements

     (193      (3,598      (12,327
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

  591,706     948,608     1,399,098  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance due to the FDIC for recoveries on covered assets

  (49,252   (39,194   (16,763
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net balance of indemnity asset and amounts due from the FDIC

$ 542,454   $ 909,414   $ 1,382,335  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Table 16 - Activity in the Remaining FDIC Loss Share Asset Discount

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Balance at beginning of period [1]

   $ 103,691      $ 141,800      $ 117,916  

Amortization of negative discount [2]

     (189,959      (161,635      (129,676

Impact of lower projected losses

     139,363        123,526        153,560  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

$ 53,095   $ 103,691   $ 141,800  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Positive balance represents negative discount (debit to assets), while a negative balance represents a discount (credit to assets).
[2] Amortization results in a negative impact to non-interest income, while a positive balance results in a positive impact to non-interest income, particularly FDIC loss share income / expense.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation revised its analysis of expected cash flow which resulted in a net decrease in estimated credit losses, which was driven mainly by commercial loan pools. The lowered loss estimates requires the Corporation to amortize the loss share asset to its currently lower expected collectible balance, thus resulting in negative accretion. Due to the shorter life of the indemnity asset compared with the expected life of the covered loans, this negative accretion temporarily offsets the benefit of higher cash flows accounted through the accretable yield on the loans.

 

107


Other real estate owned

Other real estate owned represents real estate property received in satisfaction of debt. At December 31, 2014, OREO decreased to $266 million from $304 million at December 31, 2013. Refer to Table 17 for the activity in other real estate owned. The amounts included as “covered other real estate” are subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreements.

Table 17 - Other Real Estate Owned Activity

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Non-covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Non-covered
OREO
Mortgage
    Covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Covered
OREO
Mortgage
     Total  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 48,649     $ 86,852     $ 120,215     $ 47,792      $ 303,508  

Write-downs in value

     (7,112     (3,628     (26,657     (4,969      (42,366

Additions

     16,200       65,300       55,582       21,769        158,851  

Sales

     (20,042     (49,618     (59,219     (19,028      (147,907

Other adjustments

     1,288       (2,389     (4,527     (692      (6,320
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 38,983   $ 96,517   $ 85,394   $ 44,872   $ 265,766  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Non-covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Non-covered
OREO
Mortgage
    Covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Covered
OREO
Mortgage
    Total  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 135,862     $ 130,982     $ 99,398     $ 39,660     $ 405,902  

Write-downs in value

     (11,377     (9,525     (18,857     (4,102     (43,861

Additions

     32,175       82,985       87,800       30,037       232,997  

Sales

     (108,254     (118,596     (48,447     (17,720     (293,017

Other adjustments

     243       1,006       321       (83     1,487  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 48,649   $ 86,852   $ 120,215   $ 47,792   $ 303,508  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2012  

(In thousands)

   Non-covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Non-covered
OREO
Mortgage
    Covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Covered
OREO
Mortgage
     Total  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 90,230     $ 82,267     $ 77,776     $ 31,359      $ 281,632  

Write-downs in value

     (13,727     (10,823     (7,466     (767      (32,783

Additions

     110,947       108,312       60,920       23,195        303,374  

Sales

     (51,422     (46,091     (32,022     (13,122      (142,657

Other adjustments

     (166     (2,683     190       (1,005      (3,664
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 135,862   $ 130,982   $ 99,398   $ 39,660   $ 405,902  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other assets

Table 18 provides a breakdown of the principal categories that comprise the caption of “Other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

108


Table 18 - Other Assets

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      Change  

Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance)

   $ 812,819      $ 761,768      $ 51,051  

Investments under the equity method

     225,625        197,006        28,619  

Bank-owned life insurance program

     —          228,805        (228,805

Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment

     360        383        (23

Prepaid taxes

     198,120        91,504        106,616  

Other prepaid expenses

     83,719        67,108        16,611  

Derivative assets

     25,362        34,710        (9,348

Trades receivables from brokers and counterparties

     66,949        71,680        (4,731

Others

     233,489        234,594        (1,105
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other assets

$ 1,646,443   $ 1,687,558   $ (41,115
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The decrease in other assets from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014 was principally due to BPNA’s surrendering of its bank owned life insurance contracts, which had a balance of $231.2 million as of the transaction date. BPNA received approximately $231.4 million in satisfaction of its surrender request. This was partially offset by increases of $106.6 million in prepaid taxes, $51.1 million in deferred taxes, and $28.6 million from investments under the equity method. The increase in prepaid taxes includes a payment of $45 million made during the second quarter of 2014 in connection with the Closing Agreement signed with the PR Department of Treasury and $25.7 million of unamortized corporate personal property tax and municipal tax paid during the second quarter of 2014. The increase in investments under the equity method was due mainly to a $24.1 million increase from the investment in BHD León, which in part was due to the merger transaction in which BHD acquired the net assets of Centro Financiero León. As a result of this transaction, the Corporation recognized a net gain of $14.2 million during the first quarter of 2014. The increase in net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance) was due in part to the deferred tax asset associated with the additional minimum pension liability recorded as of December 31, 2014, which increased as a result of changes to the mortality table and the impact of using a lower discount rate.

Refer to Notes 19 and 34 for additional information on the Corporation’s investments under the equity method.

Deposits and Borrowings

The composition of the Corporation’s financing to total assets at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 is included in Table 19.

Table 19 - Financing to Total Assets

 

     December 31,      December 31,      % increase (decrease)     % of total assets  

(In millions)

   2014      2013      from 2013 to 2014     2014     2013  

Non-interest bearing deposits

   $ 5,784      $ 5,923        (2.3 )%     17.5 %     16.6 %

Interest-bearing core deposits

     14,775        16,026        (7.8     44.6       44.8  

Other interest-bearing deposits

     4,249        4,762        (10.8     12.8       13.3  

Fed funds purchased and repurchase agreements

     1,272        1,659        (23.3     3.8       4.6  

Other short-term borrowings

     21        401        (94.8     0.1       1.1  

Notes payable

     1,712        1,585        8.0       5.2       4.4  

Other liabilities

     1,012        767        31.9       3.1       2.2  

Liabilities from discontinued operations

     5        —          —         —         —    

Stockholders’ equity

     4,267        4,626        (7.8     12.9       13.0  

 

109


Deposits

Table 20 - Deposits Ending Balances

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012      2011      2010  

Demand deposits [1]

   $ 6,606,060      $ 6,590,963      $ 6,442,739      $ 6,256,530      $ 5,501,430  

Savings, NOW and money market deposits (non-brokered)

     10,320,782        11,255,309        11,190,335        10,762,869        10,371,580  

Savings, NOW and money market deposits (brokered)

     406,248        553,521        456,830        212,688        —    

Time deposits (non-brokered)

     5,960,401        6,478,103        6,541,660        7,552,434        8,594,759  

Time deposits (brokered CDs)

     1,514,044        1,833,249        2,369,049        3,157,606        2,294,431  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total deposits

$ 24,807,535   $ 26,711,145   $ 27,000,613   $ 27,942,127   $ 26,762,200  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Includes interest and non-interest bearing demand deposits.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s total deposits amounted to $24.8 billion, compared to $26.7 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease in total deposits from the end of 2013 to December 31, 2014 was mainly due to the deposits sold as part of the sale of the California, Illinois and Central Florida regions, which had aggregate deposits of $2.0 billion at the time of the sales. Refer to Table 20 for a breakdown of the Corporation’s deposits at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for detailed information on the sales of BPNA’s discontinued operations.

Borrowings

The Corporation’s borrowings amounted to $3.0 billion at December 31, 2014, compared with $3.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease in borrowings was mostly due to lower balances of repurchase agreements and advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York, as part of the Corporation’s funding strategies.

On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury through the repurchase of $935 million of trust capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. At the time of the transaction, the debt had a carrying amount of $521 million, net of a discount of $414 million. The Corporation funded the repurchase through a combination of available cash and approximately $400 million from the proceeds of the issuance of its $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019 which settled on July 1, 2014.

Refer to the Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Other Commitments section in this MD&A for additional information on the Corporation’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2014.

Other liabilities

The Corporation’s other liabilities amounted to $1 billion at December 31, 2014, compared with $767 million at December 31, 2013. The increase in other liabilities of $245 million was mostly due to an increase of approximately $139 million in the minimum pension liability due to adjustments to the mortality table and the impact of using a lower discount rate, and an increase of $34 million in the GNMA loans repurchase option liability due to lower repurchase activity during the fourth quarter of 2014.

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity totaled $4.3 billion at December 31, 2014, compared with $4.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease was principally due to the net loss of $313.5 million recorded for the year and an increase of $41.1 million in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss was due mainly to the additional pension liability of $100.9 million due to adjustments to the mortality table and the impact of using a lower discount rate, which was partially offset by higher unrealized gains on securities available for sale of $56.8 million.

On July 23, 2014, the Corporation completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant initially issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in 2008 for a repurchase price of $3.0 million. Refer to the consolidated statements of financial condition and of stockholders’ equity for information on the composition of stockholders’ equity. Also, refer to Note 29 for a detail of the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), an integral component of stockholders’ equity.

 

110


REGULATORY CAPITAL

Table 21 presents the Corporation’s capital adequacy information for the years 2010 through 2014. Note 28 to the consolidated financial statements presents further information on the Corporation’s regulatory capital requirements, including the regulatory capital ratios of its depository institutions, BPPR and BPNA. The Corporation continues to exceed the well-capitalized guidelines under the federal banking regulations.

Table 21 - Capital Adequacy Data

 

     At December 31,  

(Dollars in thousands)

   2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

Risk-based capital:

          

Tier 1 capital

   $ 3,849,891     $ 4,464,742     $ 4,058,242     $ 3,899,593     $ 3,733,776  

Supplementary (Tier 2) capital

     272,347       296,813       298,906       312,477       328,522  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital

$ 4,122,238   $ 4,761,555   $ 4,357,148   $ 4,212,070   $ 4,062,298  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Risk-weighted assets:

Balance sheet items

$ 19,485,230   $ 21,409,548   $ 21,175,833   $ 21,775,369   $ 22,621,779  

Off-balance sheet items

  1,748,672     1,909,126     2,215,739     2,638,954     3,099,186  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total risk-weighted assets

$ 21,233,902   $ 23,318,674   $ 23,391,572   $ 24,414,323   $ 25,720,965  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted average quarterly assets

$ 32,250,173   $ 34,746,137   $ 35,226,183   $ 35,783,749   $ 38,490,597  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ratios:

Tier 1 capital (minimum required – 4.00%)

  18.13   19.15   17.35   15.97   14.52

Total capital (minimum required – 8.00%)

  19.41     20.42     18.63     17.25     15.79  

Leverage ratio [1]

  11.94     12.85     11.52     10.90     9.70  

Average equity to assets

  12.95     11.52     10.60     9.81     8.49  

Average tangible equity to assets

  11.45     9.78     8.82     8.10     6.77  

Average equity to loans

  19.17     16.88     15.47     14.57     12.62  

 

[1] All banks are required to have minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 3% or 4% of adjusted quarterly average assets, depending on the bank’s classification.

Under the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines for bank holding companies and member banks in effect as of December 31, 2014, to meet minimum adequately-capitalized regulatory requirements, an institution had to maintain a Tier 1 capital ratio of 4% and a total capital ratio of 8%. A “well-capitalized” institution must generally maintained capital ratios 200 basis points higher than the minimum guidelines. The risk-based capital rules are further supplemented by a Tier 1 leverage ratio, defined as Tier 1 capital divided by adjusted quarterly average total assets, after certain adjustments. “Well capitalized” bank holding companies had to maintain a minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5%. The Corporation’s ratios presented in Table 21 show that the Corporation was “well capitalized” for regulatory purposes, the highest classification, for all years presented. BPPR and BPNA were also well-capitalized for all years presented.

The reduction in the regulatory capital ratios from December 31, 2013 to the same date in 2014 was mainly the result of the reduction in total capital resulting from the repurchase on July 2, 2014 of $935 million of capital securities held by the U.S. Treasury in connection with the TARP Capital Purchase Program. This unfavorable impact to the regulatory capital ratios was in part off-set by a reduction in risk-weighted assets, mostly driven by the U.S. regional sales.

In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance under general risk-based capital rules in effect as of December 31, 2014, the trust preferred securities represent restricted core capital elements and qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to certain quantitative limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may had been included in the Corporation’s Tier 1 capital under the risk-based capital rules in effect as of December 31, 2014 could not have exceeded 25% of the sum of all core capital elements (including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may have been included in Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Corporation’s restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25% limitation.

 

111


Non-GAAP financial measures

The tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share, which are presented in the table that follows, are non-GAAP measures. Management and many stock analysts use the tangible common equity ratio and tangible book value per common share in conjunction with more traditional bank capital ratios to compare the capital adequacy of banking organizations with significant amounts of goodwill or other intangible assets, typically stemming from the use of the purchase accounting method of accounting for mergers and acquisitions. Neither tangible common equity nor tangible assets or related measures should be considered in isolation or as a substitute for stockholders’ equity, total assets or any other measure calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Moreover, the manner in which the Corporation calculates its tangible common equity, tangible assets and any other related measures may differ from that of other companies reporting measures with similar names.

Table 22 provides a reconciliation of total stockholders’ equity to tangible common equity and total assets to tangible assets at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Table 22 - Reconciliation Tangible Common Equity and Assets

 

     At December 31,  

(In thousands, except share or per share information)

   2014     2013  

Total stockholders’ equity

   $ 4,267,382     $ 4,626,150  

Less: Preferred stock

     (50,160     (50,160

Less: Goodwill

     (465,676     (647,757

Less: Other intangibles

     (37,595     (45,132
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total tangible common equity

$ 3,713,951   $ 3,883,101  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 33,096,695   $ 35,749,333  

Less: Goodwill

  (465,676   (647,757

Less: Other intangibles

  (37,595   (45,132
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total tangible assets

$ 32,593,424   $ 35,056,444  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Tangible common equity to tangible assets at end of period

  11.39 %   11.08 %

Common shares outstanding at end of period

  103,476,847     103,397,699  

Tangible book value per common share

$ 35.89   $ 37.56  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets ratio is another non-GAAP measure. Ratios calculated based upon Tier 1 common equity have become a focus of regulators and investors, and management believes ratios based on Tier 1 common equity assist investors in analyzing the Corporation’s capital position.

Because Tier 1 common equity is not formally defined by GAAP or, unlike Tier 1 capital, codified in the federal banking regulations currently in effect for the Corporation as of December 31, 2014, this measure is considered to be a non-GAAP financial measure. Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. To mitigate these limitations, the Corporation has procedures in place to calculate these measures using the appropriate GAAP or regulatory components. Although these non-GAAP financial measures are frequently used by stakeholders in the evaluation of a company, they have limitations as analytical tools, and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analyses of results as reported under GAAP.

Table 23 reconciles the Corporation’s total common stockholders’ equity (GAAP) to Tier 1 common equity as defined by the Federal Reserve Board, FDIC and other bank regulatory agencies (non-GAAP).

 

112


Table 23 - Reconciliation Tier 1 Common Equity

 

     At December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013  

Common stockholders’ equity

   $ 4,217,222     $ 4,575,990  

Less: Unrealized losses (gains) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax [1]

     (8,465     48,344  

Less: Disallowed deferred tax assets [2]

     (592,065     (626,570

Less: Disallowed goodwill and other intangible assets, net of deferred tax liability

     (447,770     (643,185

Less: Aggregate adjusted carrying value of non-financial equity investments

     (1,298     (1,442

Add: Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans and unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of tax [3]

     205,505       104,302  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Tier 1 common equity

$ 3,373,129   $ 3,457,439  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Tier 1 common equity to risk-weighted assets

  15.89   14.83
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

[1] In accordance with regulatory risk-based capital guidelines, Tier 1 capital excludes net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale debt securities and net unrealized gains on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values. In arriving at Tier 1 capital, institutions are required to deduct net unrealized losses on available-for-sale equity securities with readily determinable fair values, net of tax.
[2] Approximately $162 million of the Corporation’s $813 million of net deferred tax assets included as “Other assets” in the consolidated statement of condition at December 31, 2014 ($167 million and $762 million, respectively, at December 31, 2013), were included without limitation in regulatory capital pursuant to the risk-based capital guidelines, while approximately $592 million of such assets at December 31, 2014 ($627 million at December 31, 2013) exceeded the limitation imposed by these guidelines and, as “disallowed deferred tax assets”, were deducted in arriving at Tier 1 capital. The remaining $59 million of the Corporation’s other net deferred tax components at December 31, 2014 (($32) million at December 31, 2013) represented primarily the following items (a) the deferred tax effects of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale debt securities, which are permitted to be excluded prior to deriving the amount of net deferred tax assets subject to limitation under the guidelines; (b) the deferred tax asset corresponding to the pension liability adjustment recorded as part of accumulated other comprehensive income; and (c) the deferred tax liability associated with goodwill and other intangibles.
[3] The Federal Reserve Board has granted interim capital relief for the impact of pension liability adjustment.

Basel III Capital Requirements

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Board”), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) and together with the Board and the OCC (the “Agencies”) approved the Basel III Capital Rules to establish a revised comprehensive regulatory capital framework for all U.S. banking organizations. On July 9, 2013, the Basel III Capital Rules were approved by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and (as interim final rules) by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) (together with the Board, the “Agencies”).

The Basel III Capital Rules generally implement the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s (the “Basel Committee”) December 2010 final capital framework referred to as “Basel III” for strengthening international capital standards. The Basel III Capital Rules substantially revise the risk-based capital requirements applicable to bank holding companies and their depository institution subsidiaries, including Popular, BPPR and BPNA, as compared to the prior U.S. general risk-based capital rules. The Basel III Capital Rules revise the definitions and the components of regulatory capital, as well as address other issues affecting the numerator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios. The Basel III Capital Rules also address asset risk weights and other matters affecting the denominator in banking institutions’ regulatory capital ratios and replace the prior general risk-weighting approach, which was derived from the Basel Committee’s 1988 “Basel I” capital accords, with a more risk-sensitive approach based, in part, on the “standardized approach” in the Basel Committee’s 2004 “Basel II” capital accords. In addition, the Basel III Capital Rules implement certain provisions of Dodd-Frank Act, including the requirements of Section 939A to remove references to credit ratings from the federal agencies’ rules. The Basel III Capital Rules became effective for Popular, BPPR and BPNA on January 1, 2015, subject to phase-in periods for certain of their components and other provisions.

Among other matters, the Basel III Capital Rules: (i) introduce a new capital measure called “Common Equity Tier 1” (“CET1”) and related regulatory capital ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets; (ii) specify that Tier 1 capital consists of CET1 and “Additional Tier 1 capital” instruments meeting certain revised requirements; (iii) mandate that most deductions/adjustments to regulatory capital measures be made to CET1 and not to the other components of capital; and (iv) expand the scope of the deductions from and adjustments to capital as compared to prior regulations. Under the Basel III Capital Rules, for most banking organizations, including

 

113


the Corporation, the most common form of Additional Tier 1 capital is non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock and the most common form of Tier 2 capital is subordinated notes and a portion of the allocation for loan and lease losses, in each case, subject to the Basel III Capital Rules’ specific requirements.

Pursuant to the Basel III Capital Rules, the minimum capital ratios that became effective on January 1, 2015 are as follows:

 

   

4.5% CET1 to risk-weighted assets;

 

   

6.0% Tier 1 capital (that is, CET1 plus Additional Tier 1 capital) to risk-weighted assets;

 

   

8.0% Total capital (that is, Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets; and

 

   

4% Tier 1 capital to average consolidated assets as reported on consolidated financial statements (known as the “leverage ratio”).

The Basel III Capital Rules also introduce a new 2.5% “capital conservation buffer”, composed entirely of CET1, on top of the three minimum risk-weighted asset ratios. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress. Banking institutions with a ratio of CET1 to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the capital conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall. Thus, when fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, Popular, BPPR and BPNA will be required to maintain such an additional capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of CET1, effectively resulting in minimum ratios of (i) CET1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7%, (ii) Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.5%, and (iii) Total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 10.5%.

The Basel III Capital Rules provide for a number of deductions from and adjustments to CET1. These include, for example, the requirement that mortgage servicing rights, deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences that could not be realized through net operating loss carrybacks and significant investments in non-consolidated financial entities be deducted from CET1 to the extent that any one such category exceeds 10% of CET1 or all such items, in the aggregate, exceed 15% of CET1.

In addition (as noted above), under the prior general risk-based capital rules, the effects of AOCI items included in shareholders’ equity (for example, mark-to-market adjustments to the value of securities held in the available for sale portfolio) under U.S. GAAP are reversed for the purposes of determining regulatory capital ratios. Pursuant to the Basel III Capital Rules, the effects of certain AOCI items are not excluded; however, non-advanced approach banking organizations, including Popular, BPPR and BPNA, may make a one-time permanent election to continue to exclude these items. This election must be made concurrently with the first filing of certain of the Popular’s, BPPR’s and BPNA’s periodic regulatory reports in the beginning of 2015. Popular, BPPR and BPNA expect to make this election in order to avoid significant variations in the level of capital depending upon the impact of interest rate fluctuations on the fair value of their securities portfolio. The Basel III Capital Rules also preclude certain hybrid securities, such as trust preferred securities, from inclusion in bank holding companies’ Tier 1 capital, subject to phase-out in the case of bank holding companies that had $15 billion or more in total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009. The Corporation’s Tier 1 capital level at December 31, 2014, included $ 427 million of trust preferred securities that are subject to the phase-out provisions of the Basel III Capital Rules. The Corporation would be allowed to include only 25 percent of such trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital as of January 1, 2015 and 0 percent as of January 1, 2016, and thereafter. Trust preferred securities no longer included in Popular’s Tier 1 capital may nonetheless be included as a component of Tier 2 capital on a permanent basis without phase-out and irrespective of whether such securities otherwise meet the revised definition of Tier 2 capital set forth in the Basel III Capital Rules.

Implementation of the deductions and other adjustments to CET1 will begin on January 1, 2015 and will be phased-in over a 4-year period (beginning at 40% on January 1, 2015 and an additional 20% per year thereafter). The implementation of the capital conservation buffer will begin on January 1, 2016 at the 0.625% level and increase by 0.625% on each subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019.

With respect to BPPR and BPNA, the Basel III Capital Rules revise the “prompt corrective action” (“PCA”) regulations adopted pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, by: (i) introducing a CET1 ratio requirement at each PCA category (other than critically undercapitalized), with the required CET1 ratio being 6.5% for well-capitalized status; (ii) increasing the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio requirement for each category, with the minimum Tier 1 capital ratio for well-capitalized status being 8% (as compared to the prior 6%); and (iii) eliminating the prior provision that provides that a bank with a composite supervisory rating of 1 may have a 3% leverage ratio and still be adequately capitalized. The Basel III Capital Rules do not change the total risk-based capital requirement for any PCA category. Failure to meet capital guidelines could subject the Corporation and its depository institution subsidiaries to a variety of enforcement remedies, including the termination of deposit insurance by the FDIC and to certain restrictions on our business.

 

114


The Basel III Capital Rules prescribe a new standardized approach for risk weightings that expand the risk-weighting categories from the prior four Basel I-derived categories (0%, 20%, 50% and 100%) to a larger and more risk-sensitive number of categories, depending on the nature of the assets, and resulting in higher risk weights for a variety of asset classes.

The Corporation has evaluated the impact of the Basel III Capital Rules on our regulatory capital ratios and estimates a reduction of approximately 126 basis points to our Basel I Tier 1 Common risk-based capital ratio based on our December 31, 2014 balance sheet composition, assuming a full phase-in of the Basel III Capital Rules, and an increase of approximately 58 basis points assuming a transitional phase-in considering the applicable criteria for non-advanced banking organizations in effect as of January 1, 2015. The following table presents a preliminary estimate of the Corporation’s regulatory capital ratios and risk-weighted assets on a fully-phased in basis and on a transitional basis under the methodologies set forth in the Basel III Capital Rules based on our current understanding of those Rules and subject to certain assumptions.

We believe that Popular, BPPR and BPNA will be able to meet the required well-capitalized capital ratios on a Basel III basis.

Table 24 - Estimated Regulatory Capital Ratios Under Basel III Rules

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Transitional phase-in
December 31, 2014
    Fully phase-in
December 31, 2014
 

Tier 1 common equity (Basel I)

   $ 3,373,129     $ 3,373,129  

Adjustment related to capital components

     369,067 [a]      22,445  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Estimated Tier 1 common equity under Basel III rules without AOCI

$ 3,742,196   $ 3,395,574  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Additional Tier 1 equity (Basel I)

$ 476,762   $ 476,762  

Adjustment related to capital components

  (388,667 )[b]    (426,602 )[b] 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Estimated additional Tier 1 equity under Basel III rules

  $88,095   $ 50,160  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Tier 2 capital (Basel I)

$ 272,347   $ 272,347  

Adjustment related to capital components

  336,987 [b]    449,713 [b] 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Estimated Tier 2 capital under Basel III rules

$ 609,334   $ 722,060  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total capital (Basel I)

$ 4,122,238   $ 4,122,238  

Adjustment related to capital components

  317,387     45,556  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Estimated total capital under Basel III rules

$ 4,439,625   $ 4,167,794  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Risk-weighted assets under Basel I rules

$ 21,233,902   $ 21,233,902  

Adjustment related to RWA components

  1,483,298 [c]    1,975,471 [c] 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Estimated risk-weighted assets under Basel III rules

$ 22,717,200   $ 23,209,373  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Estimated ratios:

Tier 1 capital

  16.86   14.85

Tier 1 common equity

  16.47     14.63  

Total capital

  19.54     17.96  

Leverage

  11.76     10.67  

 

[a]

Primarily relates to the favorable impact of the phase-in of deductions related items subject to the 10 and 15 percent common equity Tier 1 capital deduction thresholds, principally the impact to the Corporation of disallowed deferred tax assets.

[b]

Under Basel III, only 25% of the outstanding balance of trust preferred securities under the transition provision is allowed as additional Tier 1 capital as of January 1, 2015, with the remaining balance included in Tier 2 capital. Under a fully phase-in approach, 100 percent of the trust preferred securities is treated as Tier 2 capital.

[c]

The main differences between the Corporation’s risk-weighted assets as calculated under Basel I compared with Basel III include mainly risk-weighting for non-performing loans, unfunded commitments and high volatility commercial real estate loans.

 

115


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS

In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in financial transactions that are not recorded on the balance sheet, or may be recorded on the balance sheet in amounts that are different than the full contract or notional amount of the transaction. As a provider of financial services, the Corporation routinely enters into commitments with off-balance sheet risk to meet the financial needs of its customers. These commitments may include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. These commitments are subject to the same credit policies and approval process used for on-balance sheet instruments. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the statement of financial position. Other types of off-balance sheet arrangements that the Corporation enters in the ordinary course of business include derivatives, operating leases and provision of guarantees, indemnifications, and representation and warranties.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The Corporation has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commercial commitments, which require future cash payments on debt and lease agreements. Also, in the normal course of business, the Corporation enters into contractual arrangements whereby it commits to future purchases of products or services from third parties. Obligations that are legally binding agreements, whereby the Corporation agrees to purchase products or services with a specific minimum quantity defined at a fixed, minimum or variable price over a specified period of time, are defined as purchase obligations.

Purchase obligations include major legal and binding contractual obligations outstanding at the end of 2014, primarily for services, equipment and real estate construction projects. Services include software licensing and maintenance, facilities maintenance, supplies purchasing, and other goods or services used in the operation of the business. Generally, these contracts are renewable or cancelable at least annually, although in some cases the Corporation has committed to contracts that may extend for several years to secure favorable pricing concessions.

As previously indicated, the Corporation also enters into derivative contracts under which it is required either to receive or pay cash, depending on changes in interest rates. These contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated statements of financial condition with the fair value representing the net present value of the expected future cash receipts and payments based on market rates of interest as of the statement of condition date. The fair value of the contract changes daily as interest rates change. The Corporation may also be required to post additional collateral on margin calls on the derivatives and repurchase transactions.

At December 31, 2014, the aggregate contractual cash obligations, including purchase obligations and borrowings, by maturities, are presented in Table 25.

Table 25 - Contractual Obligations

 

     Payments Due by Period  

(In millions)

   Less than 1 year      1 to 3 years      3 to 5 years      After 5 years      Total  

Certificates of deposits

   $ 5,011      $ 1,531      $ 860      $ 72      $ 7,474  

Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements

     1,168        104        —          —          1,272  

Other short-term borrowings

     21        —          —          —          21  

Long-term debt

     328        332        567        465        1,692  

Purchase obligations

     120        50        19        6        195  

Annual rental commitments under operating leases

     56        50        35        115        256  

Capital leases

     1        2        3        14        20  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total contractual cash obligations

$ 6,705   $ 2,069   $ 1,484   $ 672   $ 10,930  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Under the Corporation’s repurchase agreements, Popular is required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of changes in interest rates, the Corporation will be required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity.

 

116


At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s liability on its pension, restoration and postretirement benefit plans amounted to $285 million, compared with $130 million at December 31, 2013. The Corporation’s expected contributions to the pension and benefit restoration plans are minimal, while the expected contributions to the postretirement benefit plan to fund current benefit payment requirements are estimated at $5.8 million for 2015. Obligations to these plans are based on current and projected obligations of the plans, performance of the plan assets, if applicable, and any participant contributions. Refer to Note 37 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on these plans. Management believes that the effect of the pension and postretirement plans on liquidity is not significant to the Corporation’s overall financial condition. The BPPR’s non-contributory defined pension and benefit restoration plans are frozen with regards to all future benefit accruals.

At December 31, 2014, the liability for uncertain tax positions was $7.9 million, compared with $9.8 million as of the end of 2013. This liability represents an estimate of tax positions that the Corporation has taken in its tax returns which may ultimately not be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. The ultimate amount and timing of any future cash settlements cannot be predicted with reasonable certainty. Under the statute of limitations, the liability for uncertain tax positions expires as follows: 2015 - $2.2 million, 2016 - $0.8 million, 2017 - $0.8 million, 2018 - $1.1 million, and 2019 - $1.1 million, additionally $1.9 million not subject to statute of limitation. As a result of examinations, the Corporation anticipates a reduction in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, which could amount to approximately $6.7 million.

The Corporation also utilizes lending-related financial instruments in the normal course of business to accommodate the financial needs of its customers. The Corporation’s exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses credit procedures and policies in making those commitments and conditional obligations as it does in extending loans to customers. Since many of the commitments may expire without being drawn upon, the total contractual amounts are not representative of the Corporation’s actual future credit exposure or liquidity requirements for these commitments.

The following table presents the contractual amounts related to the Corporation’s off-balance sheet lending and other activities at December 31, 2014:

Table 26 - Off-Balance Sheet Lending and Other Activities

     Amount of Commitment - Expiration Period  

(In millions)

   2015      2016 - 2017      2018 - 2019      2020 - thereafter      Total  

Commitments to extend credit

   $ 6,418      $ 490      $ 174      $ 53      $ 7,135  

Commercial letters of credit

     3        —          —          —          3  

Standby letters of credit

     43        3        —          —          46  

Commitments to originate mortgage loans

     21        5        —          —          26  

Unfunded investment obligations

     —          9        —          —          9  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 6,485   $ 507   $ 174   $ 53   $ 7,219  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Guarantees Associated with Loans Sold / Serviced

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation serviced $2.1 billion in residential mortgage loans subject to lifetime credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and FHLMC residential mortgage loan securitization programs, compared with $2.5 billion at December 31, 2013. The Corporation has not sold any mortgage loans subject to credit recourse since 2010.

In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property.

 

117


In the case of Puerto Rico, most claims are settled by repurchases of delinquent loans, the majority of which are greater than 90 days past due. The average time period to prepare an initial response to a repurchase request is from 30 to 120 days from the initial written notice depending on the type of the repurchase request. Failure by the Corporation to respond to a request for repurchase on a timely basis could result in a deterioration of the seller/servicer relationship and the seller/servicer’s overall standing. In certain instances, investors could require additional collateral to ensure compliance with the servicer’s repurchase obligation or cancel the seller/servicer license and exercise their rights to transfer the servicing to an eligible seller/servicer.

The following table presents the delinquency status of the residential mortgage loans serviced by the Corporation that are subject to lifetime credit recourse provisions at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Table 27 - Delinquency of Residential Mortgage Loans Subject to Lifetime Credit Recourse

 

(In thousands)

   2014     2013  

Total portfolio

   $ 2,138,705     $ 2,524,155  

Days past due:

    

30 days and over

   $ 302,992     $ 347,046  

90 days and over

   $ 129,590     $ 138,018  

As a percentage of total portfolio:

    

30 days past due or more

     14.17     13.75

90 days past due or more

     6.06     5.47

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation repurchased approximately $89 million of unpaid principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions (December 31, 2013 - $126 million). There are no particular loan characteristics, such as loan vintages, loan type, loan-to-value ratio, or other criteria, that denote any specific trend or a concentration of repurchases in any particular segment. Based on historical repurchase experience, the loan delinquency status is the main factor which causes the repurchase request. The current economic situation has forced the investors to take a closer review at loan performance and recourse triggers, thus causing an elevated level of loan repurchases.

At December 31, 2014, there were 5 outstanding unresolved claims related to the recourse portfolio with a principal balance outstanding of $589 thousand, compared with 5 and $769 thousand, respectively, at December 31, 2013. The outstanding unresolved claims at December 31, 2014 and 2013 pertained to FNMA.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $59 million, compared with $41 million at December 31, 2013.

The following table presents the changes in the Corporation’s liability of estimated losses from these credit recourses agreements, included in the consolidated statements of financial condition for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Table 28 - Changes in Liability of Estimated Losses from Credit Recourse Agreements

 

     December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Balance as of beginning of period

   $ 41,463      $ 51,673  

Provision for recourse liability

     41,312        21,793  

Net charge-offs / terminations

     (23,337      (32,003
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance as of end of period

$ 59,438   $ 41,463  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The provision for credit recourse liability increased $19.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, when compared to 2013. The increase in the provision was due in part to certain enhancements in the estimated losses for certain credit recourse at BPPR.

 

118


The estimated losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a liability when the loans are sold and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in the line item “adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold” in the consolidated statements of operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant information becomes available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include actual defaults and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods are used to estimate the recourse liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan segmentations. The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become 90 days delinquent within the following twelve-month period. Regression analysis quantifies the relationship between the default event and loan-specific characteristics, including credit scores, loan-to-value ratios and loan aging, among others.

When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporation’s mortgage operations in the Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or are sold directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses and bear any subsequent loss related to the loans. Repurchases under representation and warranty arrangements in which the Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiaries were obligated to repurchase the loans amounted to $2.2 million in unpaid principal balance with losses amounting to $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 ($4.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2013). A substantial amount of these loans reinstate to performing status or have mortgage insurance, and thus the ultimate losses on the loans are not deemed significant.

As discussed on Note 4 – Discontinued Operations, on November 8, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of the California regional operations. In connection with this transaction, the Corporation agreed to provide, subject to certain limitations, customary indemnification to the purchaser, including with respect to certain pre-closing liabilities and violations of representations and warranties. The Corporation also agreed to indemnify the purchaser for up to 1.5% of credit losses on transferred loans for a period of two years after the closing. Pursuant to this indemnification provision, the Corporation’s maximum exposure is approximately $16.0 million. The Corporation recognized a reserve of approximately $2.2 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. This reserve is included within the liabilities from discontinued operations.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representation and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of non-performing mortgage loans. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $16.3 million. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $3.0 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. BPPR’s obligations under this clause end one year after the closing except to any claim asserted prior to such termination date. At December 31, 2014 the Corporation has a reserve balance of $2.8 million to cover claims received from the purchaser, which are currently being evaluated.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representation and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of commercial and construction loans, and commercial and single family real estate owned. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $18.0 million. BPPR is not required to repurchase any of the assets. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $10.7 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, the Corporation released $2.0 million based on an evaluation of claims received under this clause. At December 31, 2014 the Corporation has a reserve balance of $7.4 million to cover claims received from the purchaser, which are currently being evaluated.

In addition, at December 31, 2014, the Corporation has reserves for customary representations and warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. Loans had been sold to investors on a servicing released basis subject to certain representations and warranties. Although the risk of loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation made certain representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if not correct, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify investors for any related losses associated to these loans. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation’s reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $ 5 million and $ 7 million, respectively. E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008 and most of the outstanding agreements with major counterparties were settled during 2010 and 2011.

 

119


Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation serviced $15.6 billion in mortgage loans for third-parties, including the loans serviced with credit recourse, compared with $16.3 billion at December 31, 2013. The Corporation generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantees programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. At December 31, 2014, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $36 million, compared with $29 million at December 31, 2013. To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporation’s servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.

Popular, Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries amounting to $ 0.2 billion at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $ 0.2 billion). In addition, at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis $ 0.4 billion and $ 1.4 billion, respectively, of capital securities (trust preferred securities) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the trust preferred securities.

The Corporation is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business as described in Note 31 to the consolidated financial statements.

RISK MANAGEMENT

Managing risk is an essential component of the Corporation’s business. Risk identification and monitoring are key elements in overall risk management. The following principal risks, which have been incorporated into the Corporation’s risk management program, include:

 

    Credit Risk – Potential for default or loss resulting from an obligor’s failure to meet the terms of any contract with the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries, or failure otherwise to perform as agreed. Credit risk arises from all activities where success depends on counterparty, issuer, or borrower performance.

 

    Interest Rate Risk (“IRR”) – Interest rate risk is the risk to earnings or capital arising from changes in interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from differences between the timing of rate changes and the timing of cash flows (repricing risk); from changing rate relationships among different yield curves affecting bank lending and borrowing activities (basis risk); from changing rate relationships across the spectrum of maturities (yield curve risk); and from interest related options embedded in bank products (options risk).

 

    Market Risk – Potential for loss resulting from changes in market prices of the assets or liabilities in the Corporation’s or in any of its subsidiaries’ portfolios. Market prices may change as a result of changes in rates, credit and liquidity for the product or general economic conditions.

 

    Liquidity Risk – Potential for loss resulting from the Corporation or its subsidiaries not being able to meet their financial obligations when they come due. This could be a result of market conditions, the ability of the Corporation to liquidate assets or manage or diversify various funding sources. This risk also encompasses the possibility that an instrument cannot be closed out or sold at its economic value, which might be a result of stress in the market or in a specific security type given its credit, volume and maturity.

 

    Operational Risk – This risk is the possibility that inadequate or failed systems and internal controls or procedures, human error, fraud or external influences such as disasters, can cause losses.

 

120


    Compliance Risk and Legal Risk – Potential for loss resulting from violations of or non-conformance with laws, rules, regulations, prescribed practices, existing contracts or ethical standards.

 

    Strategic Risk – Potential for loss arising from adverse business decisions or improper implementation of business decisions. Also, it incorporates how management analyzes external factors that impact the strategic direction of the Corporation.

 

    Reputational Risk – Potential for loss arising from negative public opinion.

The Corporation’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) has established a Risk Management Committee (“RMC”) to undertake the responsibilities of overseeing and approving the Corporation’s Risk Management Program, as well as the Corporation’s Capital Plan. The Capital Plan is a plan to maintain sufficient regulatory capital at the Corporation, BPPR and BPNA, which considers current and future regulatory capital requirements, expected future profitability and credit trends and, at least, two macroeconomic scenarios, including a base and stress scenario.

The RMC, as an oversight body, monitors and approves the overall business strategies, and corporate policies to identify, measure, monitor and control risks while maintaining the effectiveness and efficiency of the business and operational processes. As an approval body for the Corporation, the RMC reviews and approves relevant risk management policies and critical processes. Also, it periodically reports to the Board about its activities.

The Board and RMC have delegated to the Corporation’s management the implementation of the risk management processes. This implementation is split into two separate but coordinated efforts that include (i) business and / or operational units who identify, manage and control the risks resulting from their activities, and (ii) a Risk Management Group (“RMG”). In general, the RMG is mandated with responsibilities such as assessing and reporting to the Corporation’s management and RMC the risk positions of the Corporation; developing and implementing mechanisms, policies and procedures to identify, measure and monitor risks; implementing measurement mechanisms and infrastructure to achieve effective risk monitoring; developing and implementing the necessary management information and reporting mechanisms; and monitoring and testing the adequacy of the Corporation’s policies, strategies and guidelines.

The RMG is responsible for the overall coordination of risk management efforts throughout the Corporation and is composed of three reporting divisions: (i) Credit Risk Management, (ii) Compliance Management, and (iii) Financial and Operational Risk Management. The latter includes an Enterprise Risk Management function that facilitates, among other aspects, the identification, coordination, and management of multiple and cross-enterprise risks.

Additionally, the Internal Auditing Division provides an independent assessment of the Corporation’s internal control structure and related systems and processes.

Moreover, management oversight of the Corporation’s risk-taking and risk management activities is conducted through management committees:

 

    CRESCO (Credit Strategy Committee) – Manages the Corporation’s overall credit exposure and approves credit policies, standards and guidelines that define, quantify, and monitor credit risk. Through this committee, management reviews asset quality ratios, trends and forecasts, problem loans, establishes the provision for loan losses and assesses the methodology and adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a quarterly basis.

 

    ALCO (Asset / Liability Management Committee) – Oversees and approves the policies and processes designed to ensure sound market risk and balance sheet strategies, including the interest rate, liquidity, investment and trading policies. The ALCO monitors the capital position and plan for the Corporation and approves all capital management strategies, including capital market transactions and capital distributions. The ALCO also monitors forecasted results and their impact on capital, liquidity, and net interest margin of the Corporation.

 

    ORCO (Operational Risk Committee) – Monitors operational risk management activities to ensure the development and consistent application of operational risk policies, processes and procedures that measure, limit and manage the Corporation’s operational risks while maintaining the effectiveness and efficiency of the operating and businesses’ processes.

 

121


Market / Interest Rate Risk

The financial results and capital levels of the Corporation are constantly exposed to market, interest rate and liquidity risks. The ALCO and the Corporate Finance Group are responsible for planning and executing the Corporation’s market, interest rate risk, funding activities and strategy, and for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the RMC and the ALCO. In addition, the Financial and Operational Risk Management Division is responsible for the independent monitoring and reporting of adherence with established policies, and enhancing and strengthening controls surrounding interest, liquidity and market risk. The ALCO generally meets on a weekly basis and reviews the Corporation’s current and forecasted asset and liability levels as well as desired pricing strategies and other relevant financial management and interest rate and risk topics. Also, on a monthly basis the ALCO reviews various interest rate risk sensitivity metrics, ratios and portfolio information, including but not limited to, the Corporation’s liquidity positions, projected sources and uses of funds, interest rate risk positions and economic conditions.

Market risk refers to the risk of a reduction in the Corporation’s capital due to changes in the market valuation of its assets and/or liabilities.

Most of the assets subject to market valuation risk are securities in the investment portfolio classified available for sale. Refer to Notes 9 and 10 for further information on the investment portfolio. Investment securities classified as available for sale amounted to $5.3 billion as of December 31, 2014. Other assets subject to market risk include loans held-for-sale, which amounted to $106 million, the mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) which amounted to $149 million and securities classified as “trading” which amounted to $139 million, as of December 31, 2014.

Liabilities subject to market risk include the FDIC clawback obligation, which amounted to $ 129 million at December 31, 2014.

The Corporation’s market risk is independently measured and reported by the Financial and Operational Risk Management Division and is reviewed by the Risk Management Committee of the Board.

Management believes that market risk is not a material source of risk at the Corporation. A significant portion of the Corporation’s financial activities is concentrated in Puerto Rico, which has been going through a challenging economic cycle. Refer to the Geographic and Government Risk section of this MD&A for some highlights on the current status of the Puerto Rico economy.

Interest Rate Risk

The Corporation’s net interest income is subject to various categories of interest rate risk, including repricing, basis, yield curve and option risks. In managing interest rate risk, management may alter the mix of floating and fixed rate assets and liabilities, change pricing schedules, adjust maturities through sales and purchases of investment securities, and enter into derivative contracts, among other alternatives.

Interest rate risk management is an active process that encompasses monitoring loan and deposit flows complemented by investment and funding activities. Effective management of interest rate risk begins with understanding the dynamic characteristics of assets and liabilities and determining the appropriate rate risk position given line of business forecasts, management objectives, market expectations and policy constraints.

Management utilizes various tools to assess IRR, including simulation modeling, static gap analysis, and Economic Value of Equity (EVE). The three methodologies complement each other and are used jointly in the evaluation of the Corporation’s IRR. Simulation modeling is prepared for a five year period, which in conjunction with the EVE analysis, provides Management a better view of long term IRR.

Net interest income simulation analysis performed by legal entity and on a consolidated basis is a tool used by the Corporation in estimating the potential change in net interest income resulting from hypothetical changes in interest rates. Sensitivity analysis is calculated using a simulation model which incorporates actual balance sheet figures detailed by maturity and interest yields or costs. It also incorporates assumptions on balance sheet growth and expected changes in its composition, estimated prepayments in accordance with projected interest rates, pricing and maturity expectations on new volumes and other non-interest related data. It is a dynamic process, emphasizing future performance under diverse economic conditions.

Management assesses interest rate risk by comparing various net interest income simulations under different interest rate scenarios that differ in direction of interest rate changes, the degree of change over time, the speed of change and the projected shape of the yield curve. For example, the types of rate scenarios processed during the year included economic most likely scenarios, flat rates, yield curve twists, + 200 and + 400 basis points parallel ramps and + 200 basis points parallel shocks. Management also performs analyses to isolate and measure basis and prepayment risk exposures.

 

122


The asset and liability management group performs validation procedures on various assumptions used as part of the sensitivity analysis as well as validations of results on a monthly basis. In addition, the model and processes used to assess IRR are subject to third-party validations according to the guidelines established in the Model Governance and Validation policy. Due to the importance of critical assumptions in measuring market risk, the risk models incorporate third-party developed data for critical assumptions such as prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities, estimates on the duration of the Corporation’s deposits and interest rate scenarios. These interest rate simulations exclude the impact on loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, whose yields are based on management’s current expectation of future cash flows.

The Corporation processes net interest income simulations under interest rate scenarios in which the yield curve is assumed to rise and decline gradually by the same amount. The rising rate scenarios considered in these market risk simulations reflect gradual parallel changes of 200 and 400 basis points during the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2015. Under a 200 basis points rising rate scenario, 2015 projected net interest income increases by $60 million, while under a 400 basis points rising rate scenario, 2015 projected net interest income increases by $106 million. These scenarios were compared against the Corporation’s flat or unchanged interest rates forecast scenario. Simulation analyses are based on many assumptions, including relative levels of market interest rates, interest rate spreads, loan prepayments and deposit decay. Thus, they should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results. Further, the estimates do not contemplate actions that management could take to respond to changes in interest rates. By their nature, these forward-looking computations are only estimates and may be different from what may actually occur in the future.

Static gap analysis measures the volume of assets and liabilities maturing or repricing at a future point in time. Static gap reports stratify all of the Corporation’s assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet positions according to the instrument’s maturity, repricing characteristics and optionality, assuming no new business. The repricing volumes typically include adjustments for anticipated future asset prepayments and for differences in sensitivity to market rates. The volume of assets and liabilities repricing during future periods, particularly within one year, is used as one short-term indicator of IRR. Depending on the duration and repricing characteristics, changes in interest rates could either increase or decrease the level of net interest income. For any given period, the pricing structure of the assets and liabilities is generally matched when an equal amount of such assets and liabilities mature or reprice in that period. Any mismatch of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities is known as a gap position. A positive gap denotes asset sensitivity, which means that an increase in interest rates could have a positive effect on net interest income, while a decrease in interest rates could have a negative effect on net interest income. As shown in Table 29, at December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s one-year cumulative positive gap was $5.3 billion, or 17.8% of total earning assets. This compares with $3.7 billion or 11.8%, respectively, at December 31, 2013. The change in the one-year cumulative gap position was influenced by a lower level of short-term borrowings that resulted mainly from cash inflows and lower volume of assets and higher level of capital from operations. These static measurements do not reflect the results of any projected activity and are best used as early indicators of potential interest rate exposures. They do not incorporate possible actions that could be taken to manage the Corporation’s IRR, nor do they capture the basis risks that might be included within the cumulative gap, given possible changes in the spreads between asset rates and the rates used to fund them.

 

123


Table 29 - Interest Rate Sensitivity

 

    At December 31, 2014  
    By repricing dates  

(Dollars in thousands)

  0-30 days     Within
31 -
90 days
    After three
months but
within six
months
    After six
months but
within nine
months
    After nine
months but
within one
year
    After one
year but
within two
years
    After two
years
    Non-interest
bearing
funds
    Total  

Assets:

                 

Money market investments

  $ 1,820,582     $ 804     $ 1,000     $ —       $ —       $ —       $ —       $ —       $ 1,822,386  

Investment and trading securities

    374,768       727,505       452,759       194,845       181,994       543,905     $ 3,242,986       —         5,718,762  

Loans

    7,093,074       721,795       780,179       741,789       683,650       2,117,210       9,915,520       —         22,053,217  

Other assets

    —         —         —         —         —         —         —         3,502,330       3,502,330  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

    9,288,424       1,450,104       1,233,938       936,634       865,644       2,661,115       13,158,506       3,502,330       33,096,695  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity:

                 

Savings, NOW and money market and other interest bearing demand deposits

    114,943       288,171       497,404       477,412       358,708       1,368,617       8,444,087       —         11,549,342  

Certificates of deposit

    1,669,190       924,837       1,293,293       771,928       614,295       1,028,179       1,172,723       —         7,474,445  

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

    490,442       219,891       166,058       247,093       31,135       117,038       —         —         1,271,657  

Other short-term borrowings

    21,200       —         —         —         —         —         —         —         21,200  

Notes payable

    59       119       10,205       300,205       18,300       250,933       1,132,007       —         1,711,828  

Non-interest bearing deposits

    —         —         —         —         —         —         —         5,783,748       5,783,748  

Other non-interest bearing liabilities

    —         —         —         —         —         —         —         1,017,093       1,017,093  

Stockholders’ equity

    —         —         —         —         —         —         —         4,267,382       4,267,382  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $ 2,295,834     $ 1,433,018     $ 1,966,960     $ 1,796,638     $ 1,022,438     $ 2,764,767     $ 10,748,817     $ 11,068,223     $ 33,096,695  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest rate sensitive gap

    6,992,590       17,086       (733,022     (860,004     (156,794     (103,652     2,409,689       (7,565,893     —    

Cumulative interest rate sensitive gap

    6,992,590       7,009,676       6,276,654       5,416,650       5,259,856       5,156,204       7,565,893       —         —    

Cumulative interest rate sensitive gap to earning assets

    23.63 %     23.69 %     21.21 %     18.30 %     17.77 %     17.42 %     25.57 %     —         —    

The Corporation estimates the sensitivity of economic value of equity (“EVE”) to changes in interest rates. EVE is equal to the estimated present value of the Corporation’s assets minus the estimated present value of the liabilities. This sensitivity analysis is a useful tool to measure long-term IRR because it captures the impact of up or down rate changes in expected cash flows, including principal and interest, from all future periods.

EVE sensitivity calculated using interest rate shock scenarios is estimated on a quarterly basis. The shock scenarios consist of a +/- 200 and 400 basis points parallel shocks. Management has defined limits for the increases / decreases in EVE sensitivity resulting from the shock scenarios.

The Corporation maintains an overall interest rate risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in net interest income or market value that are caused by interest rate volatility. The market value of these derivatives is subject to interest rate fluctuations and counterparty credit risk adjustments which could have a positive or negative effect in the Corporation’s earnings.

The Corporation’s loan and investment portfolios are subject to prepayment risk, which results from the ability of a third-party to repay debt obligations prior to maturity. Prepayment risk also could have a significant impact on the duration of mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, since prepayments could shorten (or lower prepayments could extend) the weighted average life of these portfolios. Table 30, which presents the maturity distribution of earning assets, takes into consideration prepayment assumptions.

 

124


Table 30 - Maturity Distribution of Earning Assets

 

     As of December 31, 2014         
     Maturities         
            After one year
through five years
     After five years                

(In thousands)

   One year
or less
     Fixed
interest rates
     Variable
interest rates
     Fixed interest
rates
     Variable
interest rates
     Total  

Money market securities

   $ 1,822,386        —          —          —          —        $ 1,822,386  

Investment and trading securities

     1,851,748      $ 2,414,585      $ 28,817      $ 1,231,631      $ 27,453        5,554,234  

Loans:

                 

Commercial

     2,973,185        1,552,149        1,970,539        882,950        835,277        8,214,100  

Construction

     129,373        21,914        64,122        33,797        2,468        251,674  

Lease financing

     202,945        347,918        —          15,287        —          566,150  

Consumer

     2,009,048        1,400,188        251,933        71,060        143,351        3,875,580  

Mortgage

     818,880        1,435,107        363,246        3,551,732        434,086        6,603,051  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-covered loans

  6,133,431     4,757,276     2,649,840     4,554,826     1,415,182     19,510,555  

Covered loans under FDIC loss sharing agreements

  1,220,220     452,795     391,464     363,169     115,014     2,542,662  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total earning assets

$ 11,027,785   $ 7,624,656   $ 3,070,121   $ 6,149,626   $ 1,557,649   $ 29,429,837  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Note: Equity securities available-for-sale and other investment securities, including Federal Reserve Bank stock and Federal Home Loan Bank stock held by the Corporation, are not included in this table.

Loans held-for-sale have been allocated according to the expected sale date.

Covered loans

The loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction were initially recorded at estimated fair values. As expressed in the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A, most of the covered loans have an accretable yield. The accretable yield includes the future interest expected to be collected over the remaining life of the acquired loans and the purchase premium or discount. The remaining life includes the effects of estimated prepayments and expected credit losses. For covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation is required to periodically evaluate its estimate of cash flows expected to be collected. These evaluations, performed quarterly, require the continued usage of key assumptions and estimates. Management must apply judgment to develop its estimates of cash flows for those covered loans given the impact of home price and property value changes, changes in interest rates and loss severities and prepayment speeds. Decreases in the expected cash flows by pool will generally result in a charge to the provision for credit losses resulting in an increase to the allowance for loan losses, while increases in the expected cash flows of a pool will generally result in an increase in interest income over the remaining life of the loan, or pool of loans.

Trading

The Corporation engages in trading activities in the ordinary course of business at its subsidiaries, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”) and Popular Securities. Popular Securities’ trading activities consist primarily of market-making activities to meet expected customers’ needs related to its retail brokerage business and purchases and sales of U.S. Government and government sponsored securities with the objective of realizing gains from expected short-term price movements. BPPR’s trading activities consist primarily of holding U.S. Government sponsored mortgage-backed securities classified as “trading” and hedging the related market risk with “TBA” (to-be-announced) market transactions. The objective is to derive spread income from the portfolio and not to benefit from short-term market movements. In addition, BPPR uses forward contracts or TBAs to hedge its securitization pipeline. Risks related to variations in interest rates and market volatility are hedged with TBAs that have characteristics similar to that of the forecasted security and its conversion timeline.

 

125


At December 31, 2014, the Corporation held trading securities with a fair value of $139 million, representing approximately 0.4% of the Corporation’s total assets, compared with $340 million and 1.0% at December 31, 2013. As shown in Table 31, the trading portfolio consists principally of mortgage-backed securities relating to BPPR’s mortgage activities described above, which at December 31, 2014 were investment grade securities. As of December 31, 2014, the trading portfolio also included $9.9 million in Puerto Rico government obligations and shares of Closed-end funds that invest primarily in Puerto Rico government obligations (December 31, 2013 - $11.1 million). Trading instruments are recognized at fair value, with changes resulting from fluctuations in market prices, interest rates or exchange rates reported in current period earnings. The Corporation recognized a net trading account gain of $4.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with a loss of $13.5 million for 2013. Table 31 provides the composition of the trading portfolio at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Table 31 - Trading Portfolio

 

     December 31, 2014     December 31, 2013  

(Dollars in thousands)

   Amount      Weighted
Average Yield [1]
    Amount      Weighted
Average Yield [1]
 

Mortgage-backed securities

   $ 110,692        6.19   $ 312,751        4.90

Collateralized mortgage obligations

     1,636        5.01       1,849        4.75  

Puerto Rico government obligations

     7,954        5.23       7,586        5.15  

Interest-only strips

     769        12.11       915        12.01  

Other

     17,476        3.26       16,642        3.14  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 138,527     5.78 $ 339,743     4.84
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Not on a taxable equivalent basis.

The Corporation’s trading activities are limited by internal policies. For each of the two subsidiaries, the market risk assumed under trading activities is measured by the 5-day net value-at-risk (“VAR”), with a confidence level of 99%. The VAR measures the maximum estimated loss that may occur over a 5-day holding period, given a 99% probability.

The Corporation’s trading portfolio had a 5-day VAR of approximately $1.1 million for the last week in December 2014. There are numerous assumptions and estimates associated with VAR modeling, and actual results could differ from these assumptions and estimates. Backtesting is performed to compare actual results against maximum estimated losses, in order to evaluate model and assumptions accuracy.

In the opinion of management, the size and composition of the trading portfolio does not represent a significant source of market risk for the Corporation.

Derivatives

Derivatives are used by the Corporation as part of its overall interest rate risk management strategy to minimize significant unexpected fluctuations in earnings and cash flows that are caused by fluctuations in interest rates. Derivative instruments that the Corporation may use include, among others, interest rate swaps, caps, floors, indexed options, and forward contracts. The Corporation does not use highly leveraged derivative instruments in its interest rate risk management strategy. The Corporation enters into interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and foreign exchange contracts for the benefit of commercial customers. Credit risk embedded in these transactions is reduced by requiring appropriate collateral from counterparties and entering into netting agreements whenever possible. All outstanding derivatives are recognized in the Corporation’s consolidated statement of condition at their fair value. Refer to Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the Corporation’s involvement in derivative instruments and hedging activities.

The Corporation’s derivative activities are entered primarily to offset the impact of market volatility on the economic value of assets or liabilities. The net effect on the market value of potential changes in interest rates of derivatives and other financial instruments is analyzed. The effectiveness of these hedges is monitored to ascertain that the Corporation is reducing market risk as expected.

 

126


Derivative transactions are generally executed with instruments with a high correlation to the hedged asset or liability. The underlying index or instrument of the derivatives used by the Corporation is selected based on its similarity to the asset or liability being hedged. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, fixed and variable interest rate hedged assets and liabilities will appreciate or depreciate in fair value. The effect of this unrealized appreciation or depreciation is expected to be substantially offset by the Corporation’s gains or losses on the derivative instruments that are linked to these hedged assets and liabilities. Management will assess if circumstances warrant liquidating or replacing the derivatives position in the hypothetical event that high correlation is reduced. Based on the Corporation’s derivative instruments outstanding at December 31, 2014, it is not anticipated that such a scenario would have a material impact on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.

Certain derivative contracts also present credit risk and liquidity risk because the counterparties may not comply with the terms of the contract, or the collateral obtained might be illiquid or become so. The Corporation controls credit risk through approvals, limits and monitoring procedures, and through master netting and collateral agreements whenever possible. Further, as applicable under the terms of the master agreements, the Corporation may obtain collateral, where appropriate, to reduce credit risk. The credit risk attributed to the counterparty’s nonperformance risk is incorporated in the fair value of the derivatives. Additionally, as required by the fair value measurements guidance, the fair value of the Corporation’s own credit standing is considered in the fair value of the derivative liabilities. During the year ended December 31, 2014, inclusion of the credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives resulted in a net gain of $1.1 million (2013 – net gain of $1.5 million; 2012 – net gain of $2.9 million), which consisted of a loss of $0.1 million (2013 – gain of $ 0.5 million; 2012 – loss of $ 0.5 million) resulting from the Corporation’s credit standing adjustment and a gain of $1.2 million (2013 – gain of $1 million; 2012 – gain of $3.4 million) from the assessment of the counterparties’ credit risk. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation had $15 million (2013 - $ 19 million) recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral posted. On the other hand, the Corporation did not have any obligation to return cash collateral received at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

The Corporation performs appropriate due diligence and monitors the financial condition of counterparties that represent a significant volume of credit exposure. Additionally, the Corporation has exposure limits to prevent any undue funding exposure.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Corporation manages the variability of cash payments due to interest rate fluctuations by the effective use of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and that are linked to specified hedged assets and liabilities. The cash flow hedges relate to forward contracts or “to be announced” (“TBA”) mortgage-backed securities that are sold and bought for future settlement to hedge mortgage-backed securities and loans prior to securitization. The seller agrees to deliver on a specified future date a specified instrument at a specified price or yield. These securities are hedging a forecasted transaction and are designated for cash flow hedge accounting. The notional amount of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges at December 31, 2014 amounted to $93 million, while it did not have any derivative that qualified to be accounted for as cash flow hedges outstanding at December 31, 2013.

Refer to Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements for additional quantitative information on these derivative contracts.

Fair Value Hedges

The Corporation did not have any derivatives designated as fair value hedges during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Trading and Non-Hedging Derivative Activities

The Corporation enters into derivative positions based on market expectations or to benefit from price differentials between financial instruments and markets mostly to economically hedge a related asset or liability. The Corporation also enters into various derivatives to provide these types of derivative products to customers. These free-standing derivatives are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recorded as part of the results of operations for the period.

Following is a description of the most significant of the Corporation’s derivative activities that are not designated for hedge accounting. Refer to Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements for additional quantitative and qualitative information on these derivative instruments.

 

127


At December 31, 2014, the Corporation had outstanding $ 238 million (2013- $ 283 million) in notional amount of interest rate swap agreements with a net negative fair value of $1 million (2013 – net negative fair value of $2 million), which were not designated as accounting hedges. These swaps were entered in the Corporation’s capacity as an intermediary on behalf of its customers and their offsetting swap position.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the impact of the mark-to-market of interest rate swaps not designated as accounting hedges was a net increase in earnings of approximately $ 1.2 million, recorded in the other operating income category of the consolidated statement of operations, compared with an earnings increase of approximately $ 1.0 million and $ 3.0 million, in 2013 and in 2012 respectively.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation did not have any forward contracts outstanding, while on December 31, 2013 it have $ 282 million in notional amount of forward contracts outstanding with a net negative fair value of $ 696 thousand not designated as accounting hedges. These forward contracts are considered derivatives and are recorded at fair value. Subsequent changes in the value of these forward contracts are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the impact of the mark-to-market of the forward contracts not designated as accounting hedges was a reduction to non-interest income of $ 10.9 million (2013 - gain of $ 9.0 million; 2012 - loss of $ 8.0 million), which was included in the category of mortgage banking activities in the consolidated statement of operations.

Furthermore, the Corporation has over-the-counter option contracts which are utilized in order to limit the Corporation’s exposure on customer deposits whose returns are tied to the S&P 500 or to certain other equity securities or commodity indexes. The Corporation offers certificates of deposit with returns linked to these indexes to its retail customers, principally in connection with individual retirement accounts (IRAs), and certificates of deposit. At December 31, 2014, these deposits amounted to $ 83 million (2013 - $ 83 million), or less than 1% (2013 – less than 1%) of the Corporation’s total deposits. In these certificates, the customer’s principal is guaranteed by the Corporation and insured by the FDIC to the maximum extent permitted by law. The instruments pay a return based on the increase of these indexes, as applicable, during the term of the instrument. Accordingly, this product gives customers the opportunity to invest in a product that protects the principal invested but allows the customer the potential to earn a return based on the performance of the indexes.

The risk of issuing certificates of deposit with returns tied to the applicable indexes is economically hedged by the Corporation. BPPR and BPNA purchase indexed options from financial institutions with strong credit standings, whose return is designed to match the return payable on the certificates of deposit issued by these banking subsidiaries. By hedging the risk in this manner, the effective cost of these deposits is fixed. The contracts have a maturity and an index equal to the terms of the pool of retail deposits that they are economically hedging.

The purchased option contracts are initially accounted for at cost (i.e., amount of premium paid) and recorded as a derivative asset. The derivative asset is marked-to-market on a quarterly basis with changes in fair value charged to earnings. The deposits are hybrid instruments containing embedded options that must be bifurcated in accordance with the derivatives and hedging activities guidance. The initial value of the embedded option (component of the deposit contract that pays a return based on changes in the applicable indexes) is bifurcated from the related certificate of deposit and is initially recorded as a derivative liability and a corresponding discount on the certificate of deposit is recorded. Subsequently, the discount on the deposit is accreted and included as part of interest expense while the bifurcated option is marked-to-market with changes in fair value charged to earnings.

The purchased indexed options are used to economically hedge the bifurcated embedded option. These option contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting, and therefore, cannot be designated as accounting hedges. At December 31, 2014, the notional amount of the indexed options on deposits approximated $ 87 million (2013 - $ 86 million) with a fair value of $ 17 million (asset) (2013 - $ 20 million) while the embedded options had a notional value of $ 83 million (2013 - $ 83 million) with a fair value of $ 13 million (liability) (2013 - $ 16 million).

Refer to Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of other non-hedging derivative activities utilized by the Corporation during 2014 and 2013.

 

128


Foreign Exchange

The Corporation holds an interest in BHD León in the Dominican Republic, which is an investment accounted for under the equity method. The Corporation’s carrying value of the equity interest in BHD approximated $108 million at December 31, 2014. This business is conducted in the country’s foreign currency. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustment, from operations for which the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, is reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the consolidated statements of condition, except for highly-inflationary environments in which the effects would be included in the consolidated statements of operations. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation had approximately $33 million in an unfavorable foreign currency translation adjustment as part of accumulated other comprehensive loss, compared with an unfavorable adjustment of $36 million at December 31, 2013 and $31 million at December 31, 2012.

Additionally, during 2013, the Corporation sold its investment in Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, C.A. (formerly EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA, C.A.) which was written-down during 2011 as the Corporation determined to wind-down those operations.

Liquidity

The objective of effective liquidity management is to ensure that the Corporation has sufficient liquidity to meet all of its financial obligations, finance expected future growth and maintain a reasonable safety margin for cash commitments under both normal and stressed market conditions. The Board is responsible for establishing the Corporation’s tolerance for liquidity risk, including approving relevant risk limits and policies. The Board has delegated the monitoring of these risks to the RMC and the ALCO. The management of liquidity risk, on a long-term and day-to-day basis, is the responsibility of the Corporate Treasury Division. The Corporation’s Corporate Treasurer is responsible for implementing the policies and procedures approved by the Board and for monitoring the Corporation’s liquidity position on an ongoing basis. Also, the Corporate Treasury Division coordinates corporate wide liquidity management strategies and activities with the reportable segments, oversees policy breaches and manages the escalation process. The Financial and Operational Risk Management Division is responsible for the independent monitoring and reporting of adherence with established policies.

An institution’s liquidity may be pressured if, for example, its credit rating is downgraded, it experiences a sudden and unexpected substantial cash outflow, or some other event causes counterparties to avoid exposure to the institution. Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook, adverse ratings of its principal markets and regulatory changes, could also affect its ability to obtain funding.

Liquidity is managed by the Corporation at the level of the holding companies that own the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. It is also managed at the level of the banking and non-banking subsidiaries. The Corporation has adopted policies and limits to monitor more effectively the Corporation’s liquidity position and that of the banking subsidiaries. Additionally, contingency funding plans are used to model various stress events of different magnitudes and affecting different time horizons that assist management in evaluating the size of the liquidity buffers needed if those stress events occur. However, such models may not predict accurately how the market and customers might react to every event, and are dependent on many assumptions.

Deposits, including customer deposits, brokered deposits and public funds deposits, continue to be the most significant source of funds for the Corporation, funding 75% of the Corporation’s total assets at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The ratio of total ending loans to deposits was 89% at December 31, 2014, compared to 93% at December 31, 2013. In addition to traditional deposits, the Corporation maintains borrowing arrangements. At December 31, 2014, these borrowings consisted primarily of $ 1.2 billion in assets sold under agreement to repurchase, $ 822 million in advances with the FHLB, $440 million in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures related to trust preferred securities and $450 million in term notes issued to partially fund the repayment of TARP funds. A detailed description of the Corporation’s borrowings, including their terms, is included in Notes 22 to 24 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, the consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements provide information on the Corporation’s cash inflows and outflows.

On April 22, 2014, the Corporation’s U.S. bank subsidiary (“PCB”) declared a $250 million cash dividend to the Bank Holding Company (“BHC”), $100 million of which was contributed by the BHC to BPPR.

On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury through the repurchase of $935 million of trust capital securities issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program. The Corporation funded the repurchase through a combination of available cash and approximately $400 million from the proceeds of the issuance of its $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019 which settled on July 1, 2014.

 

129


On July 23, 2014, the Corporation also completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant initially issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in 2008. The warrant represented the right to purchase 2,093,284 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $67 per share with an original term of 10 years. The Corporation and the U.S. Treasury agreed upon a repurchase price of $3.0 million for the warrant. With the completion of this transaction, the Corporation completed its exit from the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

The following sections provide further information on the Corporation’s major funding activities and needs, as well as the risks involved in these activities. A detailed description of the Corporation’s borrowings and available lines of credit, including its terms, is included in Notes 22 to 24 to the consolidated financial statements. Also, the consolidated statements of cash flows in the accompanying consolidated financial statements provide information on the Corporation’s cash inflows and outflows.

Banking Subsidiaries

Primary sources of funding for the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries (BPPR and BPNA), or “the banking subsidiaries,” include retail and commercial deposits, brokered deposits, unpledged investment securities, and, to a lesser extent, loan sales. In addition, the Corporation maintains borrowing facilities with the FHLB and at the discount window of the Fed, and has a considerable amount of collateral pledged that can be used to quickly raise funds under these facilities.

The principal uses of funds for the banking subsidiaries include loan originations, investment portfolio purchases, loan purchases and repurchases, repayment of outstanding obligations (including deposits), and operational expenses. Also, the banking subsidiaries assume liquidity risk related to collateral posting requirements for certain activities mainly in connection with contractual commitments, recourse provisions, servicing advances, derivatives, credit card licensing agreements and support to several mutual funds administered by BPPR.

Note 48 to the consolidated financial statements provides a consolidating statement of cash flows which includes the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries as part of the “All other subsidiaries and eliminations” column.

The banking subsidiaries maintain sufficient funding capacity to address large increases in funding requirements such as deposit outflows. This capacity is comprised mainly of available liquidity derived from secured funding sources, as well as on-balance sheet liquidity in the form of cash balances maintained at the Fed and unused secured lines held at the Fed and FHLB, in addition to liquid unpledged securities. The Corporation has established liquidity guidelines that require the banking subsidiaries to have sufficient liquidity to cover all short-term borrowings and a portion of deposits.

The Corporation’s ability to compete successfully in the marketplace for deposits, excluding brokered deposits, depends on various factors, including pricing, service, convenience and financial stability as reflected by operating results, credit ratings (by nationally recognized credit rating agencies), and importantly, FDIC deposit insurance. Although a downgrade in the credit ratings of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries may impact their ability to raise retail and commercial deposits or the rate that it is required to pay on such deposits, management does not believe that the impact should be material. Deposits at all of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries are federally insured (subject to FDIC limits) and this is expected to mitigate the potential effect of a downgrade in the credit ratings.

Deposits are a key source of funding as they tend to be less volatile than institutional borrowings and their cost is less sensitive to changes in market rates. Refer to Table 20 for a breakdown of deposits by major types. Core deposits are generated from a large base of consumer, corporate and institutional customers. Core deposits include all non-interest bearing deposits, savings deposits and certificates of deposit under $100,000, excluding brokered deposits with denominations under $100,000. Core deposits have historically provided the Corporation with a sizable source of relatively stable and low-cost funds. Core deposits totaled $20.6 billion, or 83% of total deposits, at December 31, 2014, compared with $21.9 billion, or 82% of total deposits, at December 31, 2013. Core deposits financed 69% of the Corporation’s earning assets at December 31, 2014, compared with 70% at December 31, 2013.

 

130


Certificates of deposit with denominations of $100,000 and over at December 31, 2014 totaled $3.3 billion, or 13% of total deposits (December 31, 2013 - $3.2 billion, or 12% of total deposits). Their distribution by maturity at December 31, 2014 is presented in the table that follows:

Table 32 - Distribution by Maturity of Certificate of Deposits of $100,000 and Over

 

(In thousands)

      

3 months or less

   $ 1,614,664  

3 to 6 months

     426,954  

6 to 12 months

     595,150  

Over 12 months

     626,497  
  

 

 

 

Total

$ 3,263,265  
  

 

 

 

Average deposits, including brokered deposits, for the year ended December 31, 2014 represented 82% of average earning assets, compared with 85% for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Table 33 summarizes average deposits for the past five years.

Table 33 - Average Total Deposits

 

     For the years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012      2011      2010  

Non-interest bearing demand deposits

   $ 5,533,649      $ 5,728,228      $ 5,356,649      $ 5,058,424      $ 4,732,132  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Savings accounts

  6,733,195     6,792,137     6,571,133     6,320,825     5,970,000  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand accounts

  4,824,402     5,738,189     5,555,203     5,204,235     4,981,332  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit:

Under $100,000

  3,708,622     4,817,831     5,276,389     5,966,089     6,099,741  

$100,000 and over

  3,107,735     2,995,175     3,375,846     4,026,042     4,073,047  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit

  6,816,357     7,813,006     8,652,235     9,992,131     10,172,788  

Other time deposits

  739,752     700,815     768,713     927,776     794,245  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest bearing deposits

  19,113,706     21,044,147     21,547,284     22,444,967     21,918,365  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total average deposits

$ 24,647,355   $ 26,772,375   $ 26,903,933   $ 27,503,391   $ 26,650,497  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014 approximately 6% of the Corporation’s assets were financed by brokered deposits, as compared to 7% at December 31, 2013. The Corporation had $ 1.9 billion in brokered deposits at December 31, 2014 and $2.4 billion in December 31, 2013. In the event that any of the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries’ regulatory capital ratios fall below those required by a well-capitalized institution or are subject to capital restrictions by the regulators, that banking subsidiary faces the risk of not being able to raise or maintain brokered deposits and faces limitations on the rate paid on deposits, which may hinder the Corporation’s ability to effectively compete in its retail markets and could affect its deposit raising efforts.

To the extent that the banking subsidiaries are unable to obtain sufficient liquidity through core deposits, the Corporation may meet its liquidity needs through short-term borrowings by pledging securities for borrowings under repurchase agreements, by pledging additional loans and securities through the available secured lending facilities, or by selling liquid assets. These measures are subject to availability of collateral.

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries have the ability to borrow funds from the FHLB. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the banking subsidiaries had credit facilities authorized with the FHLB aggregating to $3.7 billion and $3.0 billion, respectively, based on assets pledged with the FHLB at those dates. Outstanding borrowings under these credit facilities totaled $ 822 million at December 31, 2014 and $1.2 billion at December 31, 2013. Such advances are collateralized by loans held-in-portfolio, do not have restrictive covenants and do not have any callable features. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 the credit facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $ 4.5 billion in loans held-in-portfolio. Refer to Notes 23 and 24 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the terms of FHLB advances outstanding.

 

131


At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Corporation’s borrowing capacity at the Fed’s Discount Window amounted to approximately $2.1 billion and $3.4 billion, respectively, which remained unused as of both dates. This facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable even under difficult market conditions. The amount available under this borrowing facility is dependent upon the balance of performing loans, securities pledged as collateral and the haircuts assigned to such collateral. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, this credit facility with the Fed was collateralized by $ 4.1 billion and $4.5 billion, respectively, in loans held-in-portfolio.

On October 20, 2014, the Memorandum of Understanding (the “FRB-NY MOU”) entered into on July 20, 2011 among Popular, Inc., BPPR, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “FRB-NY”) and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico was terminated. The FRB-NY MOU provided, among other things, for the Corporation to take steps to improve its credit risk management practices and asset quality, and for the Corporation to develop strategic plans to improve earnings and to develop capital plans. The FRB-NY MOU also required the Corporation to obtain approval from the applicable FRB-NY MOU counterparties prior to, among other things, declaring or paying dividends, purchasing or redeeming any shares of its stock, consummating acquisitions or mergers, or making any distributions on its trust preferred securities or subordinated debentures. On January 9, 2015, another Memorandum of Understanding entered into among BPNA, the FRB-NY and the New York State Department of Financial Services (the “NYSDFS”), effective on July 25, 2011, was also terminated. This Memorandum of Understanding provided that BPNA could not declare dividends without the approval of the FRB-NY and the NYSDFS.

As disclosed in Note 4- Discontinued Operations, during 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of its California, Central Florida and Illinois operations. The sale of these regions resulted in a net gain of $33.8 million, after customary transaction costs. The sales resulted in a transfer of a net liability position. Accordingly, BPNA had to fund this difference with its available liquidity sources and made payments to the purchasers upon the closing of the transactions amounting to approximately $206.0 million, inclusive of certain agreed upon costs. The Corporation recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $186.5 million, related to the goodwill asset allocated to these regions. This non-cash charge had no impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios.

In connection with the restructuring of its U.S. mainland operations, the Corporation is taking steps to restructure its balance sheet and funding strategies. As part of the strategy, during the third quarter of 2014, the Corporation sold approximately $94.2 million in securities available for sale and refinanced approximately $638 million in long term structured repos in the U.S. with a yield of 4.41% and replaced them with lower cost short term repos of a similar amount. During 2014, the Corporation recognized approximately $39.8 million related to the fees associated with the refinancing of these repos.

At December 31, 2014, management believes that the banking subsidiaries had sufficient current and projected liquidity sources to meet their anticipated cash flow obligations, as well as special needs and off-balance sheet commitments, in the ordinary course of business and have sufficient liquidity resources to address a stress event. Although the banking subsidiaries have historically been able to replace maturing deposits and advances if desired, no assurance can be given that they would be able to replace those funds in the future if the Corporation’s financial condition or general market conditions were to deteriorate. The Corporation’s financial flexibility will be severely constrained if its banking subsidiaries are unable to maintain access to funding or if adequate financing is not available to accommodate future financing needs at acceptable interest rates. The banking subsidiaries also are required to deposit cash or qualifying securities to meet margin requirements. To the extent that the value of securities previously pledged as collateral declines because of market changes, the Corporation will be required to deposit additional cash or securities to meet its margin requirements, thereby adversely affecting its liquidity. Finally, if management is required to rely more heavily on more expensive funding sources to meet its future growth, revenues may not increase proportionately to cover costs. In this case, profitability would be adversely affected.

Westernbank FDIC-assisted Transaction and Impact on Liquidity

The effects of the loss sharing agreements on cash flows and operating results will depend primarily on the ability of the borrowers whose loans are covered by the loss sharing agreements to make payments over time and our ability to receive reimbursements for losses from the FDIC. As the loss sharing agreements are in effect for a period of ten years for one-to-four family loans and five years for commercial, construction and consumer loans (with periods commencing on April 30, 2010), changing economic conditions will likely impact the timing of future charge-offs and the resulting reimbursements from the FDIC. Management believes that any recapture of interest income and recognition of cash flows from the borrowers or received from the FDIC on the claims filed may be recognized unevenly over this period, as management exhausts its collection efforts under the Corporation’s normal practices.

 

132


BPPR’s liquidity may also be impacted by the loan payment performance and timing of claims made and receipt of reimbursements under the FDIC loss sharing agreements. Please refer to the Legal Proceedings section of Note 31 to the consolidated financial statements and to Part II, Item 1A- Risk factors herein for a discussion of the settlement of a contractual dispute between BPPR and the FDIC which has impacted the timing of the payment of claims under the loss share agreements.

Bank Holding Companies

The principal sources of funding for the holding companies include cash on hand, investment securities, dividends received from banking and non-banking subsidiaries (subject to regulatory limits and authorizations) asset sales, credit facilities available from affiliate banking subsidiaries and proceeds from potential securities offerings.

The principal use of these funds include the repayment of debt, and interest payments to holders of senior debt and junior subordinated deferrable interest (related to trust preferred securities) and capitalizing its banking subsidiaries.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, PIHC received $ 4.7 million in dividends from EVERTEC’s parent company. PIHC also received $10.1 million in dividends from its investment in BHD.

On April 22, 2014, the Corporation’s U.S. bank subsidiary (“PCB”) declared a $250 million cash dividend to the Bank Holding Company (“BHC”), $100 million of which was contributed by the BHC to the Puerto Rico banking subsidiary (“BPPR”).

As mentioned above, on July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of TARP funds to the U.S. Treasury through the repurchase of $935 million of trust capital securities, which was partially funded with $400 million from the issuance of $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019 which settled on July 1, 2014.

On July 23, 2014, the Corporation also completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant initially issued to the U.S. Treasury under the TARP Capital Purchase Program in 2008, for a purchase price of $3.0 million. With the completion of this transaction, the Corporation completed its exit from the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

In connection with the repayment of TARP on July 2, 2014, the Corporation accelerated the related amortization of the discount and deferred costs amounting to $414.1 million during the second quarter of 2014, which is reflected as part of interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

Another use of liquidity at the parent holding company is the payment of dividends on preferred stock. At the end of 2010, the Corporation resumed paying dividends on its Series A and B preferred stock. The preferred stock dividends amounted to $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The preferred stock dividends paid were financed by issuing new shares of common stock to the participants of the Corporation’s qualified employee savings plans. The Corporation anticipates that any future preferred stock dividend payments would continue to be financed with the issuance of new common stock in connection with its qualified employee savings plans. The Corporation is not paying dividends to holders of its common stock.

The BHC’s have in the past borrowed in the money markets and in the corporate debt market primarily to finance their non-banking subsidiaries, however, the cash needs of the Corporation’s non-banking subsidiaries other than to repay indebtedness and interest are now minimal. These sources of funding have become more costly due to the reductions in the Corporation’s credit ratings. The Corporation’s principal credit ratings are below “investment grade” which affects the Corporation’s ability to raise funds in the capital markets. The Corporation has an automatic shelf registration statement filed and effective with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which permits the Corporation to issue an unspecified amount of debt or equity securities.

Note 48 to the consolidated financial statements provides a statement of condition, of operations and of cash flows for the two BHC’s. The loans held-in-portfolio in such financial statements is principally associated with intercompany transactions.

The outstanding balance of notes payable at the BHC’s amounted to $890 million at December 31, 2014 and to $972 million on December 31, 2013. The repayment of the BHC’s obligations represents a potential cash need which is expected to be met with a combination of internal liquidity resources stemming mainly from future dividend receipts and new borrowings.

The contractual maturities of the BHC’s notes payable at December 31, 2014 are presented in Table 34.

 

133


Table 34 - Distribution of BHC’s Notes Payable by Contractual Maturity

 

Year

   (In thousands)  

2015

   $ —    

2016

     —    

2017

     —    

2018

     —    

2019

     450,000  

Later years

     439,800  
  

 

 

 

Total

  889,800  
  

 

 

 

As indicated previously, the BHC did not issue new registered debt in the capital markets during the year ended December 31, 2014.

The BHCs liquidity position continues to be adequate with sufficient cash on hand, investments and other sources of liquidity which are expected to be enough to meet all BHCs obligations during the foreseeable future.

Non-banking subsidiaries

The principal sources of funding for the non-banking subsidiaries include internally generated cash flows from operations, loan sales, repurchase agreements, and borrowed funds from their direct parent companies or the holding companies. The principal uses of funds for the non-banking subsidiaries include repayment of maturing debt, operational expenses and payment of dividends to the BHCs. The liquidity needs of the non-banking subsidiaries are minimal since most of them are funded internally from operating cash flows or from intercompany borrowings from their holding companies, BPPR or BPNA.

Other Funding Sources and Capital

The investment securities portfolio provides an additional source of liquidity, which may be realized through either securities sales or repurchase agreements. The Corporation’s investment securities portfolio consists primarily of liquid U.S. government investment securities, sponsored U.S. agency securities, government sponsored mortgage-backed securities, and collateralized mortgage obligations that can be used to raise funds in the repo markets. At December 31, 2014, the investment and trading securities portfolios, as shown in Table 30, totaled $5.6 billion, of which $1.9 billion, or 33%, had maturities of one year or less. Mortgage-related investments in Table 30 are presented based on expected maturities, which may differ from contractual maturities, since they could be subject to prepayments. The availability of the repurchase agreement would be subject to having sufficient unpledged collateral available at the time the transactions are to be consummated, in addition to overall liquidity and risk appetite of the various counterparties. The Corporation’s unpledged investment and trading securities, excluding other investment securities, amounted to $ 2.7 billion at December 31, 2014 and $2.5 billion at December 31, 2013. A substantial portion of these securities could be used to raise financing quickly in the U.S. money markets or from secured lending sources.

Additional liquidity may be provided through loan maturities, prepayments and sales. The loan portfolio can also be used to obtain funding in the capital markets. In particular, mortgage loans and some types of consumer loans, have secondary markets which the Corporation could use. The maturity distribution of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2014 is presented in Table 30. As of that date, $7.4 billion, or 33% of the loan portfolio was expected to mature within one year, compared with $8.5 billion, or 34% of the loan portfolio in the previous year. The contractual maturities of loans have been adjusted to include prepayments based on historical data and prepayment trends.

Risks to Liquidity

Total lines of credit outstanding are not necessarily a measure of the total credit available on a continuing basis. Some of these lines could be subject to collateral requirements, standards of creditworthiness, leverage ratios and other regulatory requirements, among other factors. Derivatives, such as those embedded in long-term repurchase transactions or interest rate swaps, and off-balance sheet exposures, such as recourse, performance bonds or credit card arrangements, are subject to collateral requirements. As their fair value increases, the collateral requirements may increase, thereby reducing the balance of unpledged securities.

The importance of the Puerto Rico market for the Corporation is an additional risk factor that could affect its financing activities. In the case of a deterioration in economic conditions in Puerto Rico, the credit quality of the Corporation could be affected and result in higher credit costs. The Puerto Rico economy continues to face various challenges, including significant pressures in some sectors of the residential real estate market. Refer to the Geographic and Government Risk section of this MD&A for some highlights on the current status of the Puerto Rico economy.

 

134


Factors that the Corporation does not control, such as the economic outlook and credit ratings of its principal markets and regulatory changes, could also affect its ability to obtain funding. In order to prepare for the possibility of such scenario, management has adopted contingency plans for raising financing under stress scenarios when important sources of funds that are usually fully available are temporarily unavailable. These plans call for using alternate funding mechanisms, such as the pledging of certain asset classes and accessing secured credit lines and loan facilities put in place with the FHLB and the Fed.

The credit ratings of Popular’s debt obligations are a relevant factor for liquidity because they impact the Corporation’s ability to borrow in the capital markets, its cost and access to funding sources. Credit ratings are based on the financial strength, credit quality and concentrations in the loan portfolio, the level and volatility of earnings, capital adequacy, the quality of management, the liquidity of the balance sheet, the availability of a significant base of core retail and commercial deposits, and the Corporation’s ability to access a broad array of wholesale funding sources, among other factors.

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries have historically not used unsecured capital market borrowings to finance its operations, and therefore are less sensitive to the level and changes in the Corporation’s overall credit ratings. At the BHCs, the volume of capital market borrowings has declined substantially, as the non-banking lending businesses that it had historically funded have been shut down and the need to raise unsecured senior debt has been substantially reduced.

Obligations Subject to Rating Triggers or Collateral Requirements

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries currently do not use borrowings that are rated by the major rating agencies, as these banking subsidiaries are funded primarily with deposits and secured borrowings. The banking subsidiaries had $19 million in deposits at December 31, 2014 that are subject to rating triggers.

Some of the Corporation’s derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the bank’s well-capitalized status and certain formal regulatory actions. These agreements could require exposure collateralization, early termination or both. The fair value of derivative instruments in a liability position subject to financial covenants approximated $9 million at December 31, 2014, with the Corporation providing collateral totaling $15 million to cover the net liability position with counterparties on these derivative instruments.

In addition, certain mortgage servicing and custodial agreements that BPPR has with third parties include rating covenants. In the event of a credit rating downgrade, the third parties have the right to require the institution to engage a substitute cash custodian for escrow deposits and/or increase collateral levels securing the recourse obligations. Also, as discussed in the Guarantees section of this MD&A, the Corporation services residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions. Certain contractual agreements require the Corporation to post collateral to secure such recourse obligations if the institution’s required credit ratings are not maintained. Collateral pledged by the Corporation to secure recourse obligations amounted to approximately $92 million at December 31, 2014. The Corporation could be required to post additional collateral under the agreements. Management expects that it would be able to meet additional collateral requirements if and when needed. The requirements to post collateral under certain agreements or the loss of escrow deposits could reduce the Corporation’s liquidity resources and impact its operating results.

Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality

Credit risk occurs any time funds are advanced, committed, invested or otherwise exposed. Credit risk arises primarily from the Corporation’s lending activities, as well as from other on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet credit instruments. Credit risk management is based on analyzing the creditworthiness of the borrower or counterparty, the adequacy of underlying collateral given current events and conditions, and the existence and strength of any guarantor support.

Business activities that expose the Corporation to credit risk are managed within the Board’s established limits that consider factors, such as maintaining a prudent balance of risk-taking across diversified risk types and business units (compliance with regulatory guidance, considering factors such as concentrations and loan-to-value ratios), controlling the exposure to lower credit quality assets, and limiting growth in, and overall exposure to, any product or risk segment where the Corporation does not have sufficient experience and a proven ability to predict credit losses.

 

135


The significant changes in the economic conditions and the resulting changes in the borrower’s profile over the past several years requires the Corporation to continue to focus on the identification, monitoring and managing of its credit risk. The Corporation manages credit risk by maintaining sound underwriting standards, monitoring and evaluating loan portfolio quality, its trends and collectability, and assessing reserves and loan concentrations. Also, credit risk is mitigated by implementing and monitoring lending policies and collateral requirements, and instituting credit review procedures to ensure appropriate actions to comply with laws and regulations. The Corporation’s credit policies require prompt identification and quantification of asset quality deterioration or potential loss in order to ensure the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Included in these policies, primarily determined by the amount, type of loan and risk characteristics of the credit facility, are various approval levels and lending limit constraints, ranging from the branch or department level to those that are more centralized. When considered necessary, the Corporation requires collateral to support credit extensions and commitments, which is generally in the form of real estate and personal property, cash on deposit and other highly liquid instruments.

The Corporation’s Credit Strategy Committee (“CRESCO”) is management’s top policy-making body with respect to credit-related matters and credit strategies. CRESCO reviews the activities of each subsidiary, in the detail that it deems appropriate, to ensure a proactive and coordinated management of credit granting, credit exposures and credit procedures. CRESCO’s principal functions include reviewing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses and periodically approving appropriate provisions, monitoring compliance with charge-off policy, establishing portfolio diversification, yield and quality standards, establishing credit exposure reporting standards, monitoring asset quality, and approving credit policies and amendments thereto for the subsidiaries and/or business lines, including special lending approval authorities when and if appropriate. The analysis of the allowance adequacy is presented to the Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors for review, consideration and ratification on a quarterly basis.

The Corporation also has a Corporate Credit Risk Management Division (“CCRMD”). CCRMD is a centralized unit, independent of the lending function. The CCRMD’s functions include identifying, measuring and controlling credit risk independently from the business units, evaluating the credit risk rating system and reviewing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses in accordance with GAAP and regulatory standards. CCRMD also ensures that the subsidiaries comply with the credit policies and applicable regulations, and monitors credit underwriting standards. Also, the CCRMD performs ongoing monitoring of the portfolio, including potential areas of concern for specific borrowers and/or geographic regions. The CCRMD has strengthened its quantitative measurement capabilities, part of continued improvements to the credit risk management processes.

The Corporation has a Loan Review Department within the CCRMD, which performs annual credit process reviews of several small and middle markets, construction, asset-based and corporate banking lending groups in BPPR. This group evaluates the credit risk profile of each originating unit along with each unit’s credit administration effectiveness, including the assessment of the risk rating representative of the current credit quality of the loans, and the evaluation of collateral documentation. The monitoring performed by this group contributes to assess compliance with credit policies and underwriting standards, determine the current level of credit risk, evaluate the effectiveness of the credit management process and identify control deficiencies that may arise in the credit-granting process. Based on its findings, the Corporate Loan Review Department recommends corrective actions, if necessary, that help in maintaining a sound credit process. In the case of the portfolios of commercial and construction loans in the U.S. mainland operations, credit process reviews are performed by an outside contractor. The CCRMD participates in defining the review plan with the outside loan review firm and actively participates in the discussions of the results of the loan reviews with the business units. The CCRMD may periodically review the work performed by the outside loan review firm. CCRMD reports the results of the credit process reviews to the Risk Management Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

The Corporation also created during the first quarter of 2012 the Commercial Credit Administration Group, which includes the Special Loans Division, the Commercial Credit Operations Division and the Loss-Sharing Agreement Administration Group. This unit focuses on maximizing the value of the Corporation’s special loans and other real estate owned of the commercial portfolio, as well as the FDIC covered loans portfolio. The continued expansion of the workout resources demonstrates the Corporation’s commitment on proactively identifying problem loans in order to reduce the level of non-performing assets.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s credit exposure was centered in its $22.1 billion total loan portfolio, which represented 75% of its earning assets. The portfolio composition for the last five years is presented in Table 12.

The Corporation issues certain credit-related off-balance sheet financial instruments including commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and commercial letters of credit to meet the financing needs of its customers. For these financial instruments, the contract amount represents the credit risk associated with failure of the counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract and the decline in value of the underlying collateral. The credit risk associated with these financial instruments varies depending on the counterparty’s creditworthiness and the value of any collateral held. Refer to Note 31 to the consolidated financial statements and to the Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments section of this MD&A for the Corporation’s involvement in these credit-related activities.

 

136


At December 31, 2014, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $13 million for potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines of credit (2013 - $7 million).

The Corporation is also exposed to credit risk by using derivative instruments but manages the level of risk by only dealing with counterparties of good credit standing, entering into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtaining collateral. Refer to Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the Corporation’s involvement in derivative instruments and hedging activities, and the Derivatives sub-section included under Risk Management in this MD&A.

The Corporation may also encounter risk of default in relation to its investment securities portfolio. Refer to Notes 9 and 10 for the composition of the investment securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity. The investment securities portfolio held by the Corporation at December 31, 2014 are mostly Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities, collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions.

The Corporation’s credit risk exposure is spread among individual consumers, small and medium businesses, as well as corporate borrowers engaged in a wide variety of industries. Only 168 of these commercial lending relationships have an aggregate exposure of $10 million or more. At December 31, 2014, highly leveraged transactions and credit facilities to finance real estate ventures or business acquisitions amounted to $156 million, and there are no loans to less developed countries. The Corporation limits its exposure to concentrations of credit risk by the nature of its lending limits.

The Corporation has a significant portfolio of commercial loans, mostly secured by commercial real estate properties. Due to their nature, these loans entail a higher credit risk than consumer and residential mortgage loans, since they are larger in size, may have less collateral coverage, higher concentrated risk in a single borrower and are generally more sensitive to economic downturns. General economic conditions and numerous other factors continue to create volatility in collateral values and have increased the possibility that additional losses may have to be recognized with respect to the Corporation’s current nonperforming assets. Furthermore, given the current slowdown in the real estate market, particularly in Puerto Rico, the properties securing these loans may be difficult to dispose of, if foreclosed.

Historically, the levels of real estate prices in Puerto Rico were more stable than in other U.S. markets. Nevertheless, the current economic environment has accelerated the devaluation of properties when compared with the previous periods. Also, additional economic weakness, the effect of the downgrade of Puerto Rico’s general obligation debt to non-investment grade, among others, could further pressure property values. Further declines in property values could impact the credit quality of the loan portfolios in Puerto Rico as the value of the collateral underlying the loans is the primary source of repayment in the event of foreclosure. Lower real estate values could increase the provision for loan losses, loan delinquencies, foreclosures and the cost of repossessing and disposing of real estate collateral.

Over the past several years, the Corporation has focused in de-risking its loan portfolios by reducing its exposure in asset classes with historically high loss content. During the second half of 2014, the divesture of its regional operations in California, Illinois, and Central Florida, as well as the sale of certain non-performing and legacy assets were completed, as part of the US operations reorganization. Furthermore, the Corporation has significantly curtailed the production of non-traditional mortgages as it ceased originating non-conventional mortgage loans in its U.S. mainland operations.

Management continues to refine the Corporation’s credit standards to meet the changing economic environment. The Corporation has strengthened its underwriting criteria, as well as enhanced its line management, collection strategies and problem loan management process. The commercial lending and administration groups continue strengthening critical areas to manage more effectively the current scenario, focusing strategies on critical steps in the origination and portfolio management processes to ensure the quality of incoming loans as well as to detect and manage potential problem loans early. The consumer lending group has also tightened the underwriting standards across all business lines and reduced its exposure in areas that are more likely to be impacted under the current economic conditions.

Geographic and government risk

Popular is exposed to geographical and government risk. A significant portion of our financial activities and credit exposure is concentrated in Puerto Rico, which entered into a recession in the second quarter of 2006. Puerto Rico’s gross national product contracted in real terms in every year between fiscal year 2007 and fiscal year 2011 (inclusive), and grew by 0.9% (revised figures) and 0.3% (preliminary) in fiscal years 2012 and 2013. According to the Puerto Rico Planning Board, for fiscal years 2014 and 2015,

 

137


gross national product is projected to increase by only 0.1% and 0.2%. However, the monthly economic indicators for fiscal year 2014 indicate that the final GNP figures may be lower than the last projection presented by the Puerto Rico Planning Board. The latest Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico (“GDB”) Economic Activity Index, which is a coincident indicator of ongoing economic activity, reflected a 1.4% year-over-year reduction for December 2014, after showing a 2.1% year-over-year reduction for November 2014.

This persistent contraction or minimal growth has had an adverse effect on employment. A reduction in total employment began in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 (ending June 30, 2007) and has continued consistently through fiscal year 2014 (ending June 30, 2014) due to the current recession and contractionary fiscal adjustment measures. According to the Household Survey (conducted by the Puerto Rico Department of Labor and Human Resources), the number of persons employed in Puerto Rico during fiscal year 2013 (ended June 30, 2013) averaged 1,029,019, a decrease of 0.6% compared to the previous fiscal year; and the unemployment rate averaged 14.0%. For fiscal year 2014 (ended June 30, 2014), the number of persons employed in Puerto Rico averaged 1,006,646, a decrease of 2.2% compared to the previous fiscal year; and the unemployment rate averaged 14.3%. During the first three months of fiscal year 2015 (July 1, 2014 through September 30, 2014), total employment averaged 974,800, a 3.3% reduction with respect to the same period of the prior year, and the unemployment rate averaged 14.7%.

In February 2014, the three principal rating agencies (Moody’s, S&P and Fitch) lowered their ratings on the General Obligation bonds of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the bonds of several other Commonwealth instrumentalities to non-investment grade ratings. In connection with their rating actions, the rating agencies noted various factors, including high levels of public debt, the lack of a clear economic growth catalyst, recurring fiscal budget deficits, the financial condition of the public sector employee pension plans and, more recently, liquidity concerns regarding the Commonwealth and the GDB and their ability to access the capital markets.

On June 28, 2014, Governor Alejandro García Padilla signed into law the Puerto Rico Public Corporation Debt Enforcement and Recovery Act (the “Recovery Act”) which provides a framework for certain public corporations, including the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (“PREPA”), the Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority and the Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority, to restructure their debt obligations in order to ensure that the services they provide to the public are not interrupted. On July 1, 2014, Moody’s, as a consequence of the enactment of the Recovery Act, again downgraded the majority of the Puerto Rico central government and public instrumentalities’ obligations, expressing its concern for all of Puerto Rico’s municipal debt based on the deteriorating fiscal situation on the Island and the possibility that application of the new law may further limit the Commonwealth’s ability to access the capital markets.

In July 2014, certain holders of PREPA bonds and an investment manager, on behalf of funds which hold PREPA bonds, filed separate lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (the “District Court”) seeking a declaratory judgment that the Recovery Act violates several provisions of the United States Constitution. The District Court consolidated the actions. On February 10, 2015, the District Court entered judgment that the Recovery Act is preempted by the federal Bankruptcy Code and is therefore void pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution. The District Court permanently enjoined the Commonwealth officers from enforcing the Recovery Act. The Commonwealth has filed a notice of appeal and has indicated that it will continue to defend vigorously the constitutionality of the Recovery Act.

On February 10, 2015, the Governor announced a proposal for a new tax code that would replace the current 7% sales and use tax with a 16% value-added tax, while significantly lowering income taxes. The proposal seeks to create a fair and effective system by primarily taxing consumption, rather than productivity, and to increase tax revenues to the government by reducing tax evasion. While legislation for the new tax code has been filed, it is too early to determine what changes will be made during the legislative process and what effect this proposal, if enacted into law, will have on economic activity.

On February 12, 2015, S&P further downgraded the debt rating of the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities. S&P stated that, in their view, Puerto Rico’s current economic and financial trajectory is now more susceptible to adverse financial, economic and market conditions that could ultimately impair the Commonwealth’s ability to fund services and its debt commitments. S&P also cited implementation risk with respect to the value-added tax and expressed concern that, while higher taxes could improve the budget balance, there could be potential negative economic implications. On February 19, 2015, Moody’s also downgraded its debt ratings for the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities, citing similar concerns as S&P. The portfolio of obligations of the Puerto Rico Government is comprised of securities with specific sources of income or revenues identified for repayments. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers.

 

138


The lingering effects of the prolonged recession are still reflected in limited loan demand, an increase in the rate of foreclosures and delinquencies on mortgage loans granted in Puerto Rico. If global or local economic conditions worsen or the Government is unable to access the capital markets and manage its fiscal problems in an orderly manner, those adverse effects could continue or worsen. Any reduction in consumer spending as a result of these issues may also adversely impact our non-interest revenues.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and its instrumentalities and municipalities amounted to $ 1.0 billion, of which approximately $ 811 million is outstanding. Of the amount outstanding, $ 689 million consists of loans and $ 122 million are securities. Of this amount, $ 336 million represents obligations from the Government of Puerto Rico and public corporations that are either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment. Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as public utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The remaining $ 475 million represents obligations from various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment. These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. These loans have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality. Table 35 has a summary of the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico Government.

Table 35 - Direct Exposure to the Puerto Rico Government

 

(In thousands)

   Investment Portfolio      Loans      Total Outstanding      Total Exposure  

Central Government

   $ 53,935      $ —        $ 53,935      $ 184,207  

Government Development Bank (GDB)

     7,008        100,000        107,008        107,008  

Public Corporations:

           

Puerto Rico Aqueduct and Sewer Authority

     502        100,000        100,502        131,192  

Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority

     17        74,993        75,010        75,017  

Puerto Rico Highways and Transportation Authority

     4        —          4        4  

Other

     —          —          —          1,500  

Municipalities

     60,515        414,052        474,567        518,160  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Direct Government Exposure

$ 121,981   $ 689,045   $ 811,026   $ 1,017,088  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

In addition, at December 31, 2014, the Corporation had $370 million in indirect exposure to loans or securities that are payable by non-governmental entities, but which carry a government guarantee to cover any shortfall in collateral in the event of borrower default. These included $289 million in residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority. These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. Also, the Corporation had $49 million in Puerto Rico pass-through housing bonds backed by FNMA, GNMA or residential loans CMO’s, and $32 million of industrial development notes.

On October 10, 2014, GDB entered into a note purchase, revolving credit and term loan agreement with a syndicate of banks and other financial institutions providing for the issuance of up to $900 million of GDB short-term senior notes, guaranteed by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the proceeds of which will be used to fund the purchase of an equal amount of tax and revenue anticipation notes of the Commonwealth. The Commonwealth’s tax and revenue anticipation notes, which also serve as collateral for the GDB notes, provide intra-year financing to the central Government to address timing differences between expected disbursements and receipts of taxes and revenues for fiscal year 2015. The GDB notes and the related Commonwealth’s tax and revenue anticipation notes mature on June 30, 2015. BPPR participated in this credit facility with an aggregate commitment of $100 million in the term loan and revolving credit facilities.

 

139


As further detailed in Notes 9 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, a substantial portion of the Corporation’s investment securities represented exposure to the U.S. Government in the form of U.S. Government sponsored entities, as well as agency mortgage-backed and U.S. Treasury securities. In addition, $804 million of residential mortgages and $118 million in commercial loans were insured or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or its agencies at December 31, 2014. The Corporation does not have any exposure to European sovereign debt.

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets include primarily past-due loans that are no longer accruing interest, renegotiated loans, and real estate property acquired through foreclosure. A summary, including certain credit quality metrics, is presented in Table 36.

The Corporation’s non-accruing and charge-off policies by major categories of loan portfolios are as follows:

 

   

Commercial and construction loans - recognition of interest income on commercial and construction loans is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate that the collection of principal and interest is doubtful. The impaired portions of secured loans past due as to principal and interest is charged-off not later than 365 days past due. However, in the case of collateral dependent loans individually evaluated for impairment, the excess of the recorded investment over the fair value of the collateral (portion deemed uncollectible) is generally promptly charged-off, but in any event, not later than the quarter following the quarter in which such excess was first recognized. Commercial unsecured loans are charged-off no later than 180 days past due. Overdrafts are generally charged-off no later than 60 days past their due date.

 

   

Lease financing - recognition of interest income for lease financing is ceased when loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Leases are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears.

 

   

Mortgage loans - recognition of interest income on mortgage loans is generally discontinued when loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. The impaired portion of a mortgage loan is charged-off when the loan is 180 days past due. The Corporation discontinues the recognition of interest income on residential mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) or guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) when 18 months delinquent as to principal or interest. The principal repayment on these loans is insured.

 

   

Consumer loans - recognition of interest income on closed-end consumer loans and home-equity lines of credit is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Closed-end consumer loans are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. Open-end consumer loans are charged-off when they are 180 days in arrears. Overdrafts in excess of 60 days are generally charged-off no later than 60 days past their due date.

 

   

Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) - loans classified as TDRs are typically in non-accrual status at the time of the modification. The TDR loan continues in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (generally at least six months of sustained performance after the modification (or one year for loans providing for quarterly or semi-annual payments)) and management has concluded that it is probable that the borrower would not be in payment default in the foreseeable future.

 

   

Covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for revolving lines of credit, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans, which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation, are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. Also, loans charged-off against the non-accretable difference established in purchase accounting are not reported as charge-offs. Charge-offs will be recorded only to the extent that losses exceed the purchase accounting estimates.

Because of the application of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to the Westernbank acquired loans and the loss protection provided by the FDIC which limits the risks on the covered loans, the Corporation has determined to provide certain quality metrics in this MD&A that exclude such covered loans to facilitate the comparison between loan portfolios and across periods. Given the significant amount of covered loans that are past due but still accruing due to the accounting under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the Corporation believes the inclusion of these loans in certain asset quality ratios in the numerator or denominator (or both) would result in a

 

140


significant distortion to these ratios. In addition, because charge-offs related to the acquired loans are recorded against the non-accretable balance, the net charge-off ratio including the acquired loans is lower for portfolios that have significant amounts of covered loans. The inclusion of these loans in the asset quality ratios could result in a lack of comparability across periods, and could negatively impact comparability with other portfolios that were not impacted by acquisition accounting. The Corporation believes that the presentation of asset quality measures, excluding covered loans and related amounts from both the numerator and denominator, provides a better perspective into underlying trends related to the quality of its loan portfolio.

Total non-performing non-covered assets were $785 million at December 31, 2014, increasing by $50 million, or 7%, compared with December 31, 2013, and decreasing by $1.0 billion, or 56%, compared with December 31, 2012. Non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio stand at $630 million, increasing by $33 million, or 5%, from December 31, 2013. The ratio of non-performing loans to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, increased to 3.25% at December 31, 2014 from 2.77% at December 31, 2013. The increase was largely reflective of higher commercial inflows related to the $75 million public sector borrower, offset by the return to accrual status of a $51 million addition during the first quarter of 2014.

At December 31, 2014, non-performing loans secured by real estate held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $482 million in the Puerto Rico operations and $35 million in the U.S. mainland operations. These figures compare to $388 million in the Puerto Rico operations and $141 million in the U.S. mainland operations at December 31, 2013. In addition to the non-performing loans included in Table 36, at December 31, 2014, there were $146 million of non-covered performing loans, mostly commercial loans, that in management’s opinion, are currently subject to potential future classification as non-performing and are considered impaired, compared with $103 million at December 31, 2013.

Table 36 - Non-Performing Assets

 

     At December 31,  

(Dollars in thousands)

   2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

Non-accrual loans:

          

Commercial

   $ 260,225      $ 279,053      $ 665,289      $ 830,092     $ 665,463  

Construction

     13,812       23,771       43,350       96,286       132,897  

Legacy [1]

     1,545       15,050       40,741       75,660       165,484  

Leasing

     3,102       3,495       4,865       5,642       5,674  

Mortgage

     304,913       232,681       630,130       686,502       542,033  

Consumer

     46,886       43,898       40,758       43,668       60,302  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-performing loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans

  630,483     597,948     1,425,133     1,737,850     1,571,853  

Non-performing loans held-for-sale [2]

  18,899     1,092     96,320     262,302     671,757  

Other real estate owned (“OREO”), excluding covered OREO

  135,500     135,501     266,844     172,497     161,496  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-performing assets, excluding covered assets

$ 784,882    $ 734,541    $ 1,788,297    $ 2,172,649   $ 2,405,106  

Covered loans and OREO [3]

  148,099     197,388     213,483     201,348     100,718  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-performing assets

$ 932,981    $ 931,929    $ 2,001,780    $ 2,373,997   $ 2,505,824  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more [4] [5]

$ 447,990    $ 418,028    $ 388,712    $ 316,614   $ 338,359  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Excluding covered loans: [6]

Non-performing loans to loans held-in-portfolio

  3.25   2.77   6.79   8.44 %   7.58
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Including covered loans:

Non-performing loans to loans held-in-portfolio

  2.95     2.55     6.06     7.33     6.32  

Interest lost

$ 23,413    $ 29,766    $ 86,442    $ 103,390   $ 75,684  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

[1]

The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA reportable segment.

[2]

Non-performing loans held-for-sale consist of $14.0 million in mortgage loans, $309 thousand in commercial loans and $4.5 million in consumer loans at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $603 thousand in commercial loans and $489 thousand in mortgage loans).

[3]

The amount consists of $18 million in non-performing covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and $130 million in covered OREO at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $29 million and $168 million, respectively). It excludes covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses.

 

141


[4]

The carrying value of covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 that are contractually 90 days or more past due was $0.5 billion at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $0.7 billion). This amount is excluded from the above table as the covered loans’ accretable yield interest recognition is independent from the underlying contractual loan delinquency status.

[5]

It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $125 million and $115 million, respectively, of residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $66 million in reverse mortgage loans which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets (December 31, 2013 - $50 million).

[6]

These asset quality ratios have been adjusted to remove the impact of covered loans. Appropriate adjustments to the numerator and denominator have been reflected in the calculation of these ratios. Management believes the inclusion of acquired loans in certain asset quality ratios that include non-performing assets, past due loans or net charge-offs in the numerator and denominator results in distortions of these ratios and they may not be comparable to other periods presented or to other portfolios that were not impacted by purchase accounting.

Another key measure used to evaluate and monitor the Corporation’s asset quality is loan delinquencies. Loans delinquent 30 days or more and delinquencies, as a percentage of their related portfolio category at December 31, 2014 and 2013, are presented below.

Table 37 - Loan Delinquencies

 

(Dollars in millions)

   2014     2013  

Loans delinquent 30 days or more

   $ 2,524     $ 2,635  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total delinquencies as a percentage of total loans:

Commercial

  3.91   3.52

Construction

  6.80     12.66  

Legacy

  5.45     12.42  

Lease financing

  1.97     2.31  

Mortgage

  19.99     17.72  

Consumer

  4.27     4.11  

Covered loans

  27.02     29.13  

Loans held-for-sale

  20.11     1.41  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  11.45   10.66
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more are composed primarily of credit cards, residential mortgage loans insured by FHA / VA, and delinquent mortgage loans included in the Corporation’s financial statements pursuant to GNMA’s buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the option to purchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option. Also, accruing loans past due 90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from other financial institutions that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received timely payment from the sellers / servicers, and, in some instances, have partial guarantees under recourse agreements.

Refer to Table 40 for a summary of the activity in the allowance for loan losses and selected loan losses statistics for the past 5 years.

 

142


Table 38 - Activity in Non-Performing Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Consumer and Covered Loans)

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2014  

(Dollars in thousands)

   BPPR      BPNA      Popular, Inc.  

Beginning balance

   $ 410,594      $ 139,961      $ 550,555  

Plus:

        

New non-performing loans

     643,216        56,230        699,446  

Advances on existing non-performing loans

     —          1,257        1,257  

Less:

        

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

     (21,290      (2,915      (24,205

Non-performing loans charged-off

     (89,138      (22,207      (111,345

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

     (369,275      (62,774      (432,049

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

     —          (96,180      (96,180

Non-performing loans transferred from (to) discontinued operations

     —          (228      (228

Non-performing mortgage loans reclassified to non-performing consumer loans

     (6,756      —          (6,756
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance NPLs

$ 567,351   $ 13,144   $ 580,495  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Table 39 - Activity in Non-Performing Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Consumer and Covered Loans)

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2013  

(Dollars in thousands)

   BPPR      BPNA      Popular, Inc.  

Beginning balance

   $ 1,156,229      $ 223,281      $ 1,379,510  

Plus:

        

New non-performing loans

     578,463        95,575        674,038  

Advances on existing non-performing loans

     —          1,685        1,685  

Loans transferred from held-for-sale

     14,942        400        15,342  

Other

     —          4,310        4,310  

Less:

        

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

     (62,537      (7,430      (69,967

Non-performing loans charged-off

     (139,191      (67,490      (206,681

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

     (354,985      (102,103      (457,088

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

     (14,968      (3,958      (18,926

Non-performing loans sold

     (767,359      —          (767,359

Other

     —          (4,309      (4,309
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance NPLs

$ 410,594   $ 139,961   $ 550,555  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

143


Table 40 - Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics

 

    2014     2013     2012  

(Dollars in thousands)

  Non-covered
loans [4]
    Covered
loans
    Total [4]     Non-covered
loans [4]
    Covered
loans
    Total [4]     Non-covered
loans [4]
    Covered
loans
    Total [4]  

Balance at the beginning of year

  $ 538,463     $ 102,092     $ 640,555     $ 621,701     $ 108,906     $ 730,607     $ 690,363     $ 124,945     $ 815,308  

Provision for loan losses - Continuing operations

    223,999       46,135       270,134       536,710       69,396       606,106       322,240       74,839       397,079  

Provision for loan losses (reversal of provision) - Discontinued operations

    (6,764     —         (6,764     (3,543     —         (3,543     11,862       —          11,862  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  755,698     148,227     903,925     1,154,868     178,302     1,333,170     1,024,465     199,784     1,224,249  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Charged-offs:

Commercial

  87,030     34,741     121,771     138,383     28,423     166,806     209,935     46,290     256,225  

Construction

  1,722     36,223     37,945     6,757     39,729     46,486     3,936     30,556     34,492  

Legacy [1]

  8,071     —       8,071     17,423     —       17,423     31,113     —       31,113  

Leasing

  6,028     —       6,028     6,034     —       6,034     4,680     —       4,680  

Mortgage

  48,906     9,156     58,062     59,573     10,679     70,252     75,994     5,909     81,903  

Consumer

  138,348     (2,589   135,759     135,238     3,952     139,190     156,694     8,225     164,919  

Discontinued operations

  4,452     —       4,452     38,957     —       38,957     57,140     —       57,140  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  294,557     77,531     372,088     402,365     82,783     485,148     539,492     90,980     630,472  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Recoveries:

Commercial

  46,543     1,835     48,378     43,598     816     44,414     51,285     31     51,316  

Construction

  5,468     8,537     14,005     15,399     5,621     21,020     7,411     61     7,472  

Legacy [1]

  17,141     —       17,141     21,320     —       21,320     16,260     —       16,260  

Leasing

  2,067     —       2,067     2,528     —       2,528     3,737     —       3,737  

Mortgage

  3,710     714     4,424     4,034     65     4,099     4,054     —       4,054  

Consumer

  29,528     291     29,819     41,674     71     41,745     35,022     10     35,032  

Discontinued operations

  9,997     —       9,997     20,052     —       20,052     18,993     —       18,993  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  114,454     11,377     125,831     148,605     6,573     155,178     136,762     102     136,864  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loans charged-offs (recoveries):

Commercial

  40,487     32,906     73,393     94,785     27,607     122,392     158,650     46,259     204,909  

Construction

  (3,746   27,686     23,940     (8,642   34,108     25,466     (3,475   30,495     27,020  

Legacy [1]

  (9,070   —       (9,070   (3,897   —       (3,897   14,853     —       14,853  

Leasing

  3,961     —       3,961     3,506     —       3,506     943     —       943  

Mortgage

  45,196     8,442     53,638     55,539     10,614     66,153     71,940     5,909     77,849  

Consumer

  108,820     (2,880   105,940     93,564     3,881     97,445     121,672     8,215     129,887  

Discontinued operations

  (5,545   —       (5,545   18,905     —       18,905     38,147     —       38,147  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
  180,103     66,154     246,257     253,760     76,210     329,970     402,730     90,878     493,608  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net write-downs [3]

  (35,674   —       (35,674   (362,645   —       (362,645   (34   —       (34

Net write-downs related to loans transferred to discontinued operations

  (20,202   —       (20,202   —       —       —       —       —       —    
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

$ 519,719   $ 82,073   $ 601,792   $ 538,463   $ 102,092   $ 640,555   $ 621,701   $ 108,906   $ 730,607  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Outstanding at year end

$ 19,404,451   $ 21,947,113    $ 21,611,866   $ 24,596,293    $ 20,983,192   $ 24,739,164  

Average

  19,990,182     22,760,961     21,354,143     24,581,862     20,477,264     24,527,602  

Ratios:

Allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio

  2.68   2.74   2.49   2.60   2.96   2.95 %

Recoveries to charge-offs

  38.86     33.82     36.93     31.99     25.35     21.71  

Net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio

  0.90     1.08     1.19     1.34     1.97     2.01  

Allowance for loans losses to net charge-offs

  2.89x      2.44x      2.12x      1.94x      1.54x      1.48x  

Provision for loan losses to:

Net charge-offs [2]

  1.17     1.04     0.85     0.86     0.83     0.83  

Average loans held-in-portfolio

  1.05   1.13   2.50   2.45   1.63   1.67 %

Allowance to non performing loans held-in-portfolio

  82.43     92.82     90.05     103.78     43.62     48.72  

 

[1]

The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

[2]

Excluding the provision for loans losses and net write-down related to loans sold or reclassified to held-for-sale.

[3]

Net write-downs are related to loans sold or transferred to held-for-sale.

[4]

Current and prior periods provision for loan losses and net-charge offs presented in this table has been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. Loans (ending and average) balances and credit quality ratios for prior periods included in this table has not been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations.

 

144


Table 40 (continued) - Allowance for Loan Losses and Selected Loan Losses Statistics

 

     2011      2010  

(Dollars in thousands)

   Non-covered
loans [4]
     Covered
loans
     Total [4]      Non-covered
loans [4]
    Covered
loans
     Total [4]  

Balance at the beginning of year

   $ 793,225      $ —        $ 793,225      $ 1,261,204     $ —        $ 1,261,204  

Provision for loan losses - Continuing operations

     395,937        145,635        541,572        864,661       —          864,661  

Provision for loan losses - Discontinued operations

     34,148        —          34,148        147,219       —          147,219  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
  1,223,310     145,635     1,368,945     2,273,084     —       2,273,084  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Commercial

  257,027     13,774     270,801     300,959     —       300,959  

Construction

  18,921     4,353     23,274     303,085     —       303,085  

Legacy [1]

  71,466     —       71,466     150,260     —       150,260  

Leasing

  6,527     —       6,527     10,517     —       10,517  

Mortgage

  45,785     826     46,611     99,835     —       99,835  

Consumer

  189,864     3,253     193,117     246,531     —       246,531  

Discontinued operations

  81,915     —       81,915     138,169     —       138,169  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
  671,505     22,206     693,711     1,249,356     —       1,249,356  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Recoveries:

Commercial

  41,836     —       41,836     23,947     —       23,947  

Construction

  9,924     1,500     11,424     915     —       915  

Legacy [1]

  21,313     —       21,313     15,768     —       15,768  

Leasing

  3,083     —       3,083     4,058     —       4,058  

Mortgage

  3,974     15     3,989     5,056     —       5,056  

Consumer

  40,243     1     40,244     37,247     —       37,247  

Discontinued operations

  17,084     —       17,084     9,713     —       9,713  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
  137,457     1,516     138,973     96,704     —       96,704  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net loans charged-offs (recoveries):

Commercial

  215,191     13,774     228,965     277,012     —       277,012  

Construction

  8,997     2,853     11,850     302,170     —       302,170  

Legacy [1]

  50,153     —       50,153     134,492     —       134,492  

Leasing

  3,444     —       3,444     6,459     —       6,459  

Mortgage

  41,811     811     42,622     94,779     —       94,779  

Consumer

  149,621     3,252     152,873     209,284     —       209,284  

Discontinued operations

  64,831     —       64,831     128,456     —       128,456  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
  534,048     20,690     554,738     1,152,652     —       1,152,652  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net write-downs [3]

  1,101     —       1,101     (327,207   —       (327,207
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

$ 690,363   $ 124,945   $ 815,308   $ 793,225   $ —     $ 793,225  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

145


Loans held-in-portfolio:

Outstanding at year end

$ 20,602,596    $ 24,951,299   $ 20,728,035   $ 25,564,917  

Average

  20,496,966     25,110,328     22,376,612     25,741,544  

Ratios:

Allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio

  3.35   3.27 %   3.83   3.10 %

Recoveries to charge-offs

  20.47     20.03     7.74     7.74  

Net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio

  2.61     2.21     5.15     4.48  

Allowance for loans losses to net charge-offs

  1.29 x      1.47x     0.69x      0.69x  

Provision for loan losses to:

Net charge-offs [2]

  0.81     1.04     0.88     0.88  

Average loans held-in-portfolio

  2.10   2.29 %   4.52   3.93 %

Allowance to non performing loans held-in-portfolio

  39.73     44.76     50.46     49.64  

 

[1]

The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financing related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

[2]

Excluding the provision for loans losses and net write-down related to loans sold or reclassified to held-for-sale.

[3]

Net write-downs are related to loans sold or transferred to held-for-sale.

[4]

Current and prior periods provision for loan losses and net-charge offs presented in this table has been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. Loans (ending and average) balances and credit quality ratios for prior periods included in this table has not been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations.

The following table presents net charge-offs to average loans held-in-portfolio (“HIP”) ratio by loan category for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:

Table 41 - Net Charge-Offs (Recoveries) to Average Loans HIP (Non-covered loans)

 

     2014     2013     2012  

Commercial

     0.40     1.11     1.94

Construction

     (2.22     (3.13     (0.77

Lease financing

     0.73       0.65       0.18  

Legacy

     (7.01     (0.99     3.12  

Mortgage

     0.69       0.85       1.27  

Consumer

     2.81       2.50       3.36  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  0.90   1.19   1.97
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note: The above table excludes the net write-downs related to the asset sales during the first and second quarters of 2013, and the third and fourth quarters of 2014.

The Corporation’s net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio ratio was 0.90% for the year ended December 31, 2014, down from 1.19% and 1.97% for the same periods in 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, for the year ended December 31, 2014, decreased by $73.7 million and $222.6 million, compared to the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. The decline is mostly driven by credit quality improvements, as well as the result of strategic loans sales executed by the Corporation over the past years to reduce high risk assets and improve the risk profile of its portfolios. Write-downs associated with the sale of certain classified and legacy loan portfolios in the US operations during the second half of 2014 amounted to $35.7 million. Write-downs related to the commercial and residential mortgage non-performing loans bulk sales completed during the first half of 2013 amounted to $163.1 million and $199.5 million, respectively, in the BPPR operations.

The Corporation’s credit quality trends were generally stable during 2014 with the US region exhibiting significant improvements and the Puerto Rico region remaining stable. The BPNA segment continued to reflect strong performance led by the improved risk profile of its loan portfolios, further strengthened by the sale of certain non-performing and legacy assets. Notwithstanding, Puerto Rico’s fiscal and economic conditions continued to present a challenging operating environment.

The discussions in the sections that follow assess credit quality performance for 2014 for each of the Corporation’s non-covered loan portfolios.

 

146


Commercial loans

Non-covered non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio were $260 million at December 31, 2014, compared with $279 million at December 31, 2013, and $665 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease of $19 million, or 7%, from December 31, 2013 was principally attributed to improvements in the BPNA segment. The percentage of non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio to commercial loans held-in-portfolio increased to 3.20% at December 31, 2014 from 2.78% at December 31, 2013, primarily due to the reduction in loan balance from the sale of the regional operations in the US. The percentage of non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio to commercial loans held-in-portfolio was 6.75% at December 31, 2012.

Commercial non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment increased by $72 million from December 31, 2013, mainly driven by a single $75 million public sector borrower. Commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment decreased by $91 million from December 31, 2013, reflective of sustained improvements in credit performance and loan resolutions. The loans included in the regional operations sale, as well as the bulk sales of certain commercial loans completed in the second half of the year, were mostly loans in accruing status.

Tables 42 and 43 present the changes in the non-performing commercial loans held-in-portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and BPNA segments.

Table 42 - Activity in Non-Performing Commercial Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   BPPR      BPNA      Popular, Inc.  

Beginning Balance - NPLs

   $ 186,097      $ 92,956      $ 279,053  

Plus:

        

New non-performing loans

     252,292        30,668        282,960  

Advances on existing non-performing loans

     —          957        957  

Less:

        

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

     (12,581      —          (12,581

Non-performing loans charged-off

     (52,232      (13,963      (66,195

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

     (115,666      (35,953      (151,619

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

     —          (72,216      (72,216

Non-performing loans transferred from (to) discontinued operations

     —          (134      (134
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance - NPLs

$ 257,910   $ 2,315   $ 260,225  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Table 43 - Activity in Non-Performing Commercial Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   BPPR      BPNA      Popular, Inc.  

Beginning Balance - NPLs

   $ 522,733      $ 142,556      $ 665,289  

Plus:

        

New non-performing loans

     179,377        56,677        236,054  

Advances on existing non-performing loans

     —          1,535        1,535  

Loans transferred from held-for-sale

     790        —          790  

Other

     —          4,310        4,310  

Less:

        

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

     (17,000      (3,631      (20,631

Non-performing loans charged-off

     (100,682      (39,702      (140,384

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

     (69,853      (64,831      (134,684

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

     —          (3,958      (3,958

Non-performing loans sold

     (329,268      —          (329,268
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance - NPLs

$ 186,097   $ 92,956   $ 279,053  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

147


For the year ended December 31, 2014, inflows of commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $252 million, an increase of $73 million, or 41%, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2013. This increase was impacted by two large additions during 2014, including the aforementioned $75 million public sector borrower and a $52 million single borrower which returned to accrual status during the fourth quarter of 2014. Inflows of commercial non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $32 million, a decrease of $27 million, or 46%, compared to inflows for 2013. The reduction was driven by improvements in the underlying quality of the loan portfolio.

Table 44 provides information on commercial non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the years ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012 for the BPPR (excluding the Westernbank covered loan portfolio) and BPNA segments.

Table 44 - Non-Performing Commercial Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     BPPR     BPNA     Popular, Inc.  

(Dollars in
thousands)

   December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Non-performing commercial loans

   $ 257,910     $ 186,097     $ 522,733     $ 2,315     $ 92,956     $ 142,556     $ 260,225     $ 279,053     $ 665,289  

Non-performing commercial loans to commercial loans HIP

     4.05 %     2.88 %     8.30 %     0.13 %     2.60 %     4.00 %     3.20 %     2.78 %     6.75 %
     BPPR     BPNA     Popular, Inc.  
     For the year ended     For the year ended     For the year ended  

(Dollars in
thousands)

   December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Commercial loan net charge-offs (recoveries)

   $ 39,382     $ 85,601     $ 144,640     $ (4,574   $ 23,368     $ 44,653     $ 34,808     $ 108,969     $ 189,293  

Commercial loan net charge-offs (recoveries) to average commercial loans HIP

     0.62 %     1.37 %     2.30 %     (0.20 )%      0.65 %     1.29 %     0.40 %     1.11 %     1.94

There are two commercial loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-accrual status with an outstanding aggregate balance of $88 million at December 31, 2014, compared with one commercial loan relationship with an outstanding aggregate balance of $15 million at December 31, 2013.

Commercial loan net charge-offs, excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, amounted to $34.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $109.0 million in December 31, 2013 and $189.3 million in December 31, 2012. The decline of $74.2 million, or 68%, for the year ended December 31, 2014 when compared with the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily reflects improvements in credit quality and successful actions taken by the Corporation to address problem loans. Commercial loans net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 0.40% for the year ended December 31, 2014 from 1.11% for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 1.94% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Commercial loan net charge-offs in the BPPR segment amounted to $39.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $85.6 million in December 31, 2013 and $144.6 million in December 31, 2012. The decline of $46.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 when compared with the year ended December 31, 2013, was mainly reflective of the improved risk profile of the portfolio after the bulk sales completed in 2013. Commercial loans annualized net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 0.62% for the year ended December 31, 2014 from 1.37% for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2.30% for the year ended December 31, 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the charge-offs associated with collateral dependent impaired commercial loans amounted to approximately $30.0 million at the BPPR segment.

Commercial loan net charge-offs (recoveries) in the BPNA segment amounted to recoveries of $4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $23.4 million in charge-offs in December 31, 2013 and $44.7 million in December 31, 2012. The decline of $27.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 when compared with the same period in 2013 was primarily due to

 

148


improved credit quality and lower level of non-performing loans. Commercial loans net charge-offs to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to (0.20%) for the year ended December 31, 2014 from 0.65% for the year ended December 31, 2013, and 1.29% for the year ended December 31, 2012 due to recovery activity. For the year ended December 31, 2014, there were no charge-offs associated with collateral dependent impaired commercial loans from continuing operations at the BPNA segment.

The Corporation’s commercial loan portfolio secured by real estate (“CRE”), excluding covered loans, amounted to $4.7 billion at December 31, 2014, of which $1.7 billion was secured with owner occupied properties, compared with $6.4 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively, at December 31, 2013. CRE non-performing loans, excluding covered loans, amounted to $129 million at December 31, 2014, compared with $221 million at December 31, 2013. The CRE non-performing loans ratios for the BPPR and BPNA segments were 3.60% and 0.07%, respectively, at December 31, 2014, compared with 3.80% and 3.10%, respectively, at December 31, 2013.

Construction loans

Non-covered non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio amounted to $14 million at December 31, 2014, compared to $24 million at December 31, 2013, and $43 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease of $10 million, or 42%, from December 31, 2013 was mainly driven by declines of $4 million and $6 million in the BPPR and BPNA segments, respectively, principally driven by loan collections and minimal inflows of new construction non-performing loans. Stable credit trends in the construction portfolio were the result of de-risking strategies executed by the Corporation over the past several years to downsize its construction loan portfolio. The ratio of non-performing construction loans to construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, decreased to 5.48% at December 31, 2014 from 11.53% at December 31, 2013, and 17.14% at December 31, 2012.

Tables 45 and 46 present changes in non-performing construction loans held-in-portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and BPNA segments.

Table 45 - Activity in Non-Performing Construction Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   BPPR      BPNA      Popular, Inc.  

Beginning Balance - NPLs

   $ 18,108      $ 5,663      $ 23,771  

Plus:

        

New non-performing loans

     9,485        —          9,485  

Less:

        

Non-performing loans charged-off

     (1,687      —          (1,687

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

     (12,094      (5,663      (17,757
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance - NPLs

$ 13,812   $ —     $ 13,812  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Table 46 - Activity in Non-Performing Construction Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   BPPR      BPNA      Popular, Inc.  

Beginning Balance - NPLs

   $ 37,390      $ 5,960      $ 43,350  

Plus:

        

New non-performing loans

     2,000        —          2,000  

Loans transferred from held-for-sale

     14,152        —          14,152  

Less:

        

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

     (775      —          (775

Non-performing loans charged-off

     (6,210      —          (6,210

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

     (24,965      (297      (25,262

Non-performing loans sold

     (3,484      —          (3,484
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance - NPLs

$ 18,108   $ 5,663   $ 23,771  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

149


For the year ended December 31, 2014, inflows of construction non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $9 million, an increase of $7 million when compared to additions for the year ended December 31, 2013, principally related to one single borrower. There were no additions of construction non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment during 2014.

There are no construction loan relationships greater than $10 million in non-performing status at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Construction loan net charge-offs (recoveries), excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, amounted to recoveries of $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to recoveries of $8.6 million in December 31, 2013 and $1.9 million in December 31, 2012. Construction loans net charge-offs (recoveries) to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio resulted in (2.22%) for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to (3.13%) for the year ended December 31, 2013 and (0.77%) for the year ended December 31, 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the charge-offs associated with collateral dependent impaired construction loans amounted to $2.3 million in the BPPR segment and none in the BPNA segment. Management identified construction loans considered impaired and charged-off specific reserves based on the value of the collateral.

Table 47 provides information on construction non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR and BPNA (excluding the covered loan portfolio) segments for the years ended December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013, and December 31, 2012.

Table 47 - Non-Performing Construction Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

    BPPR     BPNA     Popular, Inc.  

(Dollars in thousands)

  December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Non-performing construction loans

  $ 13,812     $ 18,108     $ 37,390     $ —       $ 5,663     $ 5,960     $ 13,812     $ 23,771     $ 43,350  

Non-performing construction loans to construction loans HIP

    8.67 %     11.24 %     17.61 %     —   %     12.61 %     14.68 %     5.48 %     11.53 %     17.14 %
    BPPR     BPNA     Popular, Inc.  
    For the year ended     For the year ended     For the year ended  

(Dollars in thousands)

  December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Construction loan net (recoveries) charge-offs

  $ (3,509   $ (8,642   $ (2,283   $ (237   $ —       $ 400     $ (3,746   $ (8,642   $ (1,883

Construction loan net (recoveries) charge-offs to average construction loans HIP

    (2.42 )%      (3.57 )%      (1.19 )%      (0.99 )%      —   %     0.77 %     (2.22 )%      (3.13 )%      (0.77 )%

Legacy loans

The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

Legacy non-performing loans held-in-portfolio amounted to $2 million at December 31, 2014, compared with $15 million at December 31, 2013, and $41 million at December 31, 2012. The decrease of $13.5 million, or 90%, from December 31, 2013 was primarily driven by lower inflows to non-performing loans, loan resolutions and portfolio run-off. The percentage of non-performing legacy loans held-in-portfolio to legacy loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 1.91% at December 31, 2014 from 7.13% at December 31, 2013, and 10.60% at December 31, 2012.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, additions to legacy loans in non-performing status amounted to $6 million, a decrease of $10 million, or 62%, when compared with the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

150


Tables 48 and 49 present the changes in non-performing legacy loans held in-portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Table 48 - Activity in Non-Performing Legacy Loans Held-In-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   BPPR      BPNA      Popular, Inc.  

Beginning Balance - NPLs

   $ —        $ 15,050      $ 15,050  

Plus:

        

New non-performing loans

     —          6,004        6,004  

Advances on existing non-performing loans

     —          300        300  

Less:

        

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

     —          (189      (189

Non-performing loans charged-off

     —          (6,237      (6,237

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

     —          (8,610      (8,610

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

     —          (4,679      (4,679

Non-performing loans from (to) discontinued operations

     —          (94      (94
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance - NPLs

$ —     $ 1,545   $ 1,545  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Table 49 - Activity in non-Performing Legacy Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   BPPR      BPNA      Popular, Inc.  

Beginning Balance - NPLs

   $ —        $ 40,741      $ 40,741  

Plus:

        

New non-performing loans

     —          16,645        16,645  

Advances on existing non-performing loans

     —          150        150  

Loans transferred from held-for-sale

     —          400        400  

Less:

        

Non-performing loans charged-off

     —          (19,426      (19,426

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

     —          (19,151      (19,151

Other

     —          (4,309      (4,309
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance - NPLs

$ —     $ 15,050   $ 15,050  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

In the loans held-in-portfolio, there was no legacy loan relationship greater than $10 million in non-accrual status at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries) amounted to recoveries of $9.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to recoveries of $2.6 million in December 31, 2013 and net charge-offs of $16.3 million in December 31, 2012. Legacy loan net charge-offs (recoveries) to average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to (7.01%) for the year ended December 31, 2014 from (0.99%) for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 3.12% for the year ended December 31, 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2014, there were no charge-offs associated with collateral dependent legacy loans from continuing operations.

Continued improvements in credit performance was mainly driven lower level of problem loans, loan resolutions, and the continued run-off of the portfolio.

Table 50 provides information on legacy non-performing loans and net charge-offs.

 

151


Table 50 - Non-Performing Legacy Loans and Net Charge-offs

 

    BPNA  

(Dollars in thousands)

  December 31, 2014     December 31, 2013     December 31, 2012  

Non-performing legacy loans

  $ 1,545      $ 15,050      $ 40,741  

Non-performing legacy loans to legacy loans HIP

    1.91     7.13     10.60
    BPNA  
    For the year ended  

(Dollars in thousands)

  December 31, 2014     December 31, 2013     December 31, 2012  

Legacy loan net (recoveries) charge-offs

  $ (9,742   $ (2,583   $ 16,338  

Legacy loan net (recoveries) charge-offs to average legacy loans HIP

    (7.01 )%      (0.99 )%      3.12

Mortgage loans

Non-covered non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio were $305 million at December 31, 2014, compared to $233 million at December 31, 2013, and $630 million at December 31, 2012. The increase of $72 million from December 31, 2013 was mainly driven by an increase of $89 million in the BPPR segment, in part offset by a decrease of $17 million in the BPNA segment. The decrease in the BPNA segment was mainly due to the sale of certain mortgage non-performing loans, as part of the US operations reorganization. The percentage of non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio to mortgage loans held-in-portfolio increased to 4.69% at December 31, 2014 from 3.48% at December 31, 2013. This ratio was 10.37% at December 31, 2012.

Tables 51 and 52 present changes in non-performing mortgage loans held-in-portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for the BPPR (excluding covered loans) and BPNA segments.

Table 51 - Activity in Non-Performing Mortgage Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   BPPR      BPNA      Popular, Inc.  

Beginning Balance - NPLs

   $ 206,389      $ 26,292      $ 232,681  

Plus:

        

New non-performing loans

     381,439        19,558        400,997  

Less:

        

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

     (8,709      (2,726      (11,435

Non-performing loans charged-off

     (35,219      (2,007      (37,226

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

     (241,515      (12,548      (254,063

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

     —          (19,285      (19,285

Non-performing mortgage loans reclassified to non-performing consumer loans

     (6,756      —          (6,756
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance - NPLs

$ 295,629   $ 9,284   $ 304,913  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

152


Table 52 - Activity in Non-Performing Mortgage Loans Held-in-Portfolio (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   BPPR      BPNA      Popular, Inc.  

Beginning Balance - NPLs

   $ 596,106      $ 34,024      $ 630,130  

Plus:

        

New non-performing loans

     397,086        22,253        419,339  

Less:

        

Non-performing loans transferred to OREO

     (44,762      (3,799      (48,561

Non-performing loans charged-off

     (32,299      (8,362      (40,661

Loans returned to accrual status / loan collections

     (260,167      (17,824      (277,991

Loans transferred to held-for-sale

     (14,968      —          (14,968

Non-performing loans sold

     (434,607      —          (434,607
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance - NPLs

$ 206,389   $ 26,292   $ 232,681  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014, inflows of mortgage non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $381 million, a decrease of $16 million, or 4%, when compared to inflows for the same period in 2013. Inflows of mortgage non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $20 million, a decrease of $3 million, or 12%, compared to inflows for 2013.

Mortgage loan net charge-offs, excluding net charge-offs for covered loans, amounted to $45.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $55.5 million in December 31, 2013 and $71.9 million in December 31, 2012. The decrease of $10.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, when compared with the same period in 2013 was mainly related to reductions in the BPNA segment. Mortgage loan net charge-offs to average mortgage non-covered loans held-in-portfolio was 0.69% in December 31, 2014, compared to 0.85% for the year ended December 31, 2013, and 1.27% for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Mortgage loan net charge-offs at the BPPR segment, excluding covered loans, remained stable at $44.0 million, or 0.82% of average non-covered loans held-in-portfolio, compared to $47.7 million, or 0.89% of average loans in the same period in 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2014, charge-offs associated with mortgage loans individually evaluated for impairment amounted to $9.1 million in the BPPR segment.

Mortgage loan net charge-offs at the BPNA segment amounted to $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of $6.6 million when compared with the same period in 2013, mainly reflective of credit quality improvements and the stabilization of the US economic environment. Mortgage loan net charge-offs to average mortgage non-covered loans held-in-portfolio decreased to 0.10% for the year ended December 31, 2014 from 0.64% for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Table 53 provides information on mortgage non-performing loans and net charge-offs for the BPPR and BPNA (excluding the covered loan portfolio) segments for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.

 

153


Table 53 - Non-Performing Mortgage Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     BPPR     BPNA     Popular, Inc.  

(Dollars in
thousands)

   December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Non-performing mortgage loans

   $ 295,629     $ 206,389     $ 596,106     $ 9,284     $ 26,292     $ 34,024     $ 304,913     $ 232,681     $ 630,130  

Non-performing mortgage loans to mortgage loans HIP

     5.42 %     3.82 %     12.05 %     0.88 %     2.05 %     3.01 %     4.69 %     3.48 %     10.37 %
     BPPR     BPNA     Popular, Inc.  
     For the year ended     For the year ended     For the year ended  

(Dollars in
thousands)

   December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Mortgage loan net charge-offs

   $ 44,000     $ 47,736     $ 56,777     $ 1,196     $ 7,803     $ 15,163     $ 45,196     $ 55,539     $ 71,940  

Mortgage loan net charge-offs to average mortgage loans HIP

     0.82 %     0.89 %     1.21 %     0.10 %     0.64 %     1.52 %     0.69 %     0.85 %     1.27 %

Consumer loans

Non-covered non-performing consumer loans held-in-portfolio were $47 million at December 31, 2014, compared to $44 million at December 31, 2013, and $41 million at December 31, 2012. Consumer non-covered non-performing loans held-in-portfolio increased slightly by $3 million when compared to December 31, 2013, primarily as a result of an increase of $8 million in the BPPR segment, mainly related to personal and auto loans.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, inflows of consumer non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPPR segment amounted to $97 million, an increase of $9 million, or 10%, when compared to inflows for the same period of 2013. Inflows of consumer non-performing loans held-in-portfolio at the BPNA segment amounted to $20 million, a decrease of $7 million, or 26% compared to inflows for 2013.

The Corporation’s consumer loan net charge-offs, excluding covered loans, amounted to $109.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared to $97.0 million in December 31, 2013 and $126.1 million in December 31, 2012. The increase of $12.6 million in consumer net charge-offs for the year ended December 31, 2014, when compared with the same period in 2013, was driven by an increase of $21.1 million in the BPPR segment, reflective of certain deterioration in credit quality trends. In addition, 2013 net charge-offs include an $8.9 million recovery associated with an opportunistic sale of a portfolio of previously charged-off credit cards and personal loans in the BPPR segment. Consumer loan net charge-offs to average consumer non-covered loans held-in-portfolio was 2.81% for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with 2.50% for December 31, 2013 and 3.36% for December 31, 2012.

Table 54 provides information on consumer non-performing loans and net charge-offs by segments.

Table 54 - Non-Performing Consumer Loans and Net Charge-offs (Excluding Covered Loans)

 

     BPPR     BPNA     Popular, Inc.  

(Dollars in
thousands)

   December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Non-performing consumer loans

   $ 40,930     $ 33,166     $ 30,888     $ 5,956     $ 10,732     $ 9,870     $ 46,886     $ 43,898     $ 40,758  

Non-performing consumer loans to consumer loans HIP

     1.21 %     1.00 %     0.96 %     1.24 %     1.74 %     1.56 %     1.21 %     1.63 %     1.05 %

 

154


     BPPR     BPNA     Popular, Inc.  
     For the year ended     For the year ended     For the year ended  

(Dollars in
thousands)

   December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
    December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
    December 31,
2012
 

Consumer loan net charge-offs

   $ 96,655     $ 75,560     $ 90,095     $ 12,971     $ 21,411     $ 36,004     $ 109,626     $ 96,971     $ 126,099  

Consumer loan net charge-offs to average consumer loans HIP

     2.86 %     2.32 %     2.93 %     2.50 %     3.43 %     5.38 %     2.81 %     2.50 %     3.36 %

Combined net charge-offs for E-LOAN’s home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages amounted to approximately $3.8 million, or 1.58% of those particular average loan portfolios, for the year ended December 31, 2014, compared with $10.8 million, or 3.78%, for the year ended December 31, 2013. With the downsizing of E-LOAN, this subsidiary ceased originating these types of loans in 2008. Home equity lending includes both home equity loans and lines of credit. This type of lending, which is secured by a first or second mortgage on the borrower’s residence, allows customers to borrow against the equity in their home. Real estate market values at the time the loan or line is granted directly affect the amount of credit extended and, in addition, changes in these values impact the severity of losses. E-LOAN’s portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages outstanding at December 31, 2014 totaled $220 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $6 million, representing 2.53% of that particular portfolio. E-LOAN’s portfolio of home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages outstanding at December 31, 2013 totaled $259 million with a related allowance for loan losses of $11 million, representing 4.05% of that particular portfolio. At December 31, 2014, home equity lines of credit and closed-end second mortgages in which E-LOAN holds both the first and second lien amounted to $47 thousand and $233 thousand, respectively, representing 0.01% and 0.05%, respectively, of the consumer loan portfolio of the BPNA segment. At December 31, 2014, 47% are paying the minimum amount due on the home equity lines of credit. At December 31, 2014, the majority of the closed-end second mortgages in which E-LOAN holds the first lien mortgage were in performing status.

Other real estate

Other real estate represents real estate property acquired through foreclosure, part of the Corporation’s continuous efforts to aggressively resolve non-performing loans. Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC remained flat at $136 million, when compared to December 31, 2013.

Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, comprised principally of repossessed commercial real estate properties, amounted to $130 million at December 31, 2014, compared with $168 million at the same date in 2013. Generally, 80% of the write-downs taken on these properties based on appraisals or losses on the sale are covered under the loss sharing agreements.

During 2014, the Corporation transferred $159 million of loans to other real estate, sold $ 148 million of foreclosed properties and recorded write-downs and other adjustments of approximately $ 49 million.

Updated appraisals or third-party opinions of value (“BPOs”) are obtained to adjust the values of the other real estate assets. Commencing in 2011, the appraisal for a commercial or construction other real estate property with a book value greater than $1 million is updated annually and if lower than $1 million it is updated at least every two years. For residential other real estate property, the Corporation requests third-party BPOs or appraisals generally on an annual basis. Appraisals may be adjusted due to age, collateral inspections and property profiles or due to general marked conditions. The adjustments applied are based upon internal information like other appraisals for the type of properties and loss severity information that can provide historical trends in the real estate market, and may change from time to time based on market conditions.

For commercial and construction other real estate properties at the BPPR segment, depending on the type of property and/or the age of the appraisal, downward adjustments currently may range between 20% to 50%, including estimated cost to sell. For commercial and construction properties at the BPNA segment, the most typically applied collateral discount rate currently ranges from 10% to 40%, including cost to sell. This discount was determined based on an analysis of other real estate owned and loan sale transactions during the past two years, comparing net proceeds received by the lender relative to the most recent appraised value of the properties. However, additional haircuts can be applied depending upon the age of appraisal, the region and the condition of the property or project.

 

155


Currently, in the case of the BPPR segment, appraisals of residential properties were subject to downward adjustments of up to approximately 17%, including cost to sell of 5%. In the case of the U.S. mainland residential properties, the downward adjustment approximated up to 10%, including cost to sell of 10%.

Troubled debt restructurings

The following tables present the loans classified as TDRs according to their accruing status at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

The Corporation’s TDR loans, excluding covered loans) totaled $1.1 billion at December 31, 2014, an increase of $157 million, or 17%, from December 31, 2013. TDRs in accruing status increased by $56 million from December 31, 2013, due to sustained borrower performance.

Table 55 - TDRs Non-Covered Loans 2014

 

     December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Accruing      Non-Accruing      Total  

Commercial

   $ 153,380      $ 150,069      $ 303,449  

Construction

     453        5,488        5,941  

Mortgage

     556,346        116,465        672,811  

Leases

     775        2,248        3,023  

Consumer

     107,530        14,848        122,378  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 818,484   $ 289,118   $ 1,107,602  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Table 56 - TDRs Non-Covered Loans 2013

 

     December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Accruing      Non-Accruing      Total  

Commercial

   $ 109,462      $ 80,140      $ 189,602  

Construction

     425        10,865        11,290  

Legacy

     —          949        949  

Mortgage

     535,357        82,786        618,143  

Leases

     270        2,623        2,893  

Consumer

     116,719        10,741        127,460  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 762,233   $ 188,104   $ 950,337  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Table 57 - TDRs Non-Covered Loans 2012

 

     December 31, 2012  

(In thousands)

   Accruing      Non-Accruing      Total  

Commercial

   $ 105,648      $ 208,119      $ 313,767  

Construction

     2,969        10,310        13,279  

Legacy

     —          5,978        5,978  

Mortgage

     405,063        273,042        678,105  

Leases

     1,726        3,155        4,881  

Consumer

     125,955        8,981        134,936  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 641,361   $ 509,585   $ 1,150,946  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following tables present the covered loans classified as TDRs according to their accruing status at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Table 58 - TDRs Covered Loans 2014

 

     December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Accruing      Non-Accruing      Total  

Commercial

   $ 1,689      $ 3,257      $ 4,946  

Construction

     —          2,419        2,419  

Mortgage

     3,629        3,990        7,619  

Consumer

     26        5        31  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 5,344   $ 9,671   $ 15,015  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Table 59 - TDRs Covered Loans 2013

 

     December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Accruing      Non-Accruing      Total  

Commercial

   $ 7,389      $ 10,017      $ 17,406  

Construction

     —          3,464        3,464  

Mortgage

     146        189        335  

Consumer

     221        22        243  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 7,756   $ 13,692   $ 21,448  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

156


Table 60 - TDRs Covered Loans 2012

 

     December 31, 2012  

(In thousands)

   Accruing      Non-Accruing      Total  

Commercial

   $ 46,142      $ 4,071      $ 50,213  

Construction

     —          7,435        7,435  

Mortgage

     149        220        369  

Consumer

     517        106        623  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 46,808   $ 11,832   $ 58,640  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s commercial loan TDRs, excluding covered loans, for the BPPR and BPNA segments amounted to $303 million and $250 thousand, respectively, of which $150 million and none, respectively, were in non-performing status. This compares with $172 million and $18 million, respectively, of which $63 million and $17 million were in non-performing status at December 31, 2013. The outstanding commitments for these commercial loan TDRs amounted to $5 million in the BPPR segment and no commitments outstanding in the BPNA segment at December 31, 2014. Commercial loans that have been modified as part of loss mitigation efforts were evaluated individually for impairment, resulting in a specific reserve of $65 million for the BPPR segment and none for the BPNA segment at December 31, 2014, compared with $13 million and none, respectively, at December 31, 2013.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s construction loan TDRs, excluding covered loans, for the BPPR and the BPNA segments amounted to $6 million and none, respectively, of which $5 million and none, respectively, which were in non-performing status. This compares with $6 million each, of which $5 million and $6 million were in non-performing status at December 31, 2013. The outstanding commitments for these construction loan TDRs amounted to $1 million in the BPPR segment and no commitments outstanding in the BPNA segment at December 31, 2014. These construction loan TDRs were individually evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific reserve of $363 thousand for the BPPR and none for the BPNA segments at December 31, 2014, compared with $177 thousand and none, respectively, at December 31, 2013.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s had no legacy loans modifications, compared with $949 thousand at December 31, 2013. These loans were in non-performing status at December 31, 2013. There were no commitments outstanding for these legacy loan TDRs at December 31, 2014. The legacy loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment requiring no specific reserves at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

At December 31, 2014, the mortgage loan TDRs for the BPPR and BPNA segments amounted to $669 million (including $290 million guaranteed by U.S. sponsored entities) and $4 million, respectively, of which $115 million and $987 thousand, respectively, were in non-performing status. This compares with $565 million (including $240 million guaranteed by U.S. sponsored entities) and $53 million, respectively, of which $73 million and $10 million were in non-performing status at December 31, 2013. These mortgage loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses of $46 million and $273 thousand for the BPPR and BPNA segments, respectively, at December 31, 2014, compared to $38 million and $18 million, respectively, at December 31, 2013.

At December 31, 2014, the consumer loan TDRs for the BPPR and BPNA segments amounted to $120 million and $2 million, respectively, of which $15 million and $35 thousand, respectively, were in non-performing status, compared with $125 million and $2 million, respectively, of which $10 million and $587 thousand, respectively, were in non-performing status at December 31, 2013. These consumer loan TDRs were evaluated for impairment resulting in a specific allowance for loan losses of $28 million and $365 thousand for the BPPR and BPNA segments, respectively, at December 31, 2014, compared with $30 million and $280 thousand, respectively, at December 31, 2013.

Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on modifications considered troubled debt restructurings, including certain qualitative and quantitative data about troubled debt restructurings performed in the past twelve months.

Allowance for Loan Losses

Non-Covered Loan Portfolio

The allowance for loan losses, which represents management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio, is maintained at a sufficient level to provide for estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. The Corporation’s management evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses on a

 

157


quarterly basis. In this evaluation, management considers current economic conditions and the resulting impact on Popular Inc.’s loan portfolio, the composition of the portfolio by loan type and risk characteristics, historical loss experience, results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans, regulatory requirements and loan impairment measurement, among other factors.

The Corporation must rely on estimates and exercise judgment regarding matters where the ultimate outcome is unknown, such as economic developments affecting specific customers, industries or markets. Other factors that can affect management’s estimates are the years of historical data when estimating losses, changes in underwriting standards, financial accounting standards and loan impairment measurements, among others. Changes in the financial condition of individual borrowers, in economic conditions, in historical loss experience and in the condition of the various markets in which collateral may be sold may all affect the required level of the allowance for loan losses. Consequently, the business financial condition, liquidity, capital and results of operations could also be affected.

The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with accounting guidance, specifically guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 (loans individually assessed for impairment). Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date for loans (pools) accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses in the current period. For purposes of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and new loans originated as a result of loan commitments assumed, the Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the accounting guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment. Refer to the Critical Accounting Policies / Estimates section of this MD&A for a description of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology.

The following tables set forth information concerning the composition of the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”) at December 31, 2014, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 by loan category and by whether the allowance and related provisions were calculated individually pursuant to the requirements for specific impairment or through a general valuation allowance.

Table 61 - Composition of the Allowance for Loan Losses

 

December 31, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

  Commercial     Construction     Legacy [3]     Leasing     Mortgage     Consumer     Total [2]  

Specific ALLL

  $ 64,736     $ 363     $ —       $ 770     $ 46,111     $ 28,161     $ 140,141  

Impaired loans [1]

  $ 357,161     $ 13,268     $ —       $ 3,023     $ 435,824     $ 117,732     $ 927,008  

Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1]

    18.13     2.74     —       25.47     10.58     23.92     15.12

General ALLL

  $ 146,501     $ 6,307     $ 2,944     $ 6,361     $ 77,211     $ 140,254     $ 379,578  

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

  $ 7,777,106     $ 238,552     $ 80,818     $ 561,366     $ 6,067,062     $ 3,752,539     $ 18,477,443  

General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

    1.88     2.64     3.64     1.13     1.27     3.74     2.05

Total ALLL

  $ 211,237     $ 6,670     $ 2,944     $ 7,131     $ 123,322     $ 168,415     $ 519,719  

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio  [1]

  $ 8,134,267     $ 251,820     $ 80,818     $ 564,389     $ 6,502,886     $ 3,870,271     $ 19,404,451  

ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1]

    2.60     2.65     3.64     1.26     1.90     4.35     2.68

 

[1]

Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

[2]

Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. At December 31, 2014, the general allowance on the covered loans amounted to $82.1 million while the specific reserve amounted to $5 thousand.

[3]

The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA reportable segment.

 

158


Table 62 - Composition of the Allowance for Loan Losses

 

December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

  Commercial     Construction     Legacy [3]     Leasing     Mortgage     Consumer     Total [2]  

Specific ALLL

  $ 16,409     $ 177     $ —       $ 1,053     $ 55,667     $ 30,200     $ 103,506  

Impaired loans [1]

  $ 297,516     $ 22,486     $ 6,045     $ 2,893     $ 452,073     $ 127,703     $ 908,716  

Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1]

    5.52     0.79     —       36.40     12.31     23.65     11.39

General ALLL

  $ 158,573     $ 5,165     $ 13,704     $ 9,569     $ 101,262     $ 146,684     $ 434,957  

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

  $ 9,739,669     $ 183,598     $ 205,090     $ 540,868     $ 6,229,403     $ 3,804,523     $ 20,703,151  

General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans  [1]

    1.63     2.81     6.68     1.77     1.63     3.86     2.10

Total ALLL

  $ 174,982     $ 5,342     $ 13,704     $ 10,622     $ 156,929     $ 176,884     $ 538,463  

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio [1]

  $ 10,037,185     $ 206,084     $ 211,135     $ 543,761     $ 6,681,476     $ 3,932,226     $ 21,611,867  

ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1]

    1.74     2.59     6.49     1.95     2.35     4.50     2.49

 

[1]

Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

[2]

Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. At December 31, 2013, the general allowance on the covered loans amounted to $101.8 million while the specific reserve amounted to $0.3 million.

[3]

The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA reportable segment.

Table 63 - Composition of the Allowance for Loan Losses

 

December 31, 2012

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Legacy [3]     Leasing     Mortgage     Consumer     Total [2]  

Specific ALLL

   $ 17,348     $ 120     $ —       $ 1,066     $ 74,667     $ 17,886     $ 111,087  

Impaired loans [1]

   $ 527,664     $ 41,809     $ 18,744     $ 4,881     $ 611,230     $ 133,377     $ 1,337,705  

Specific ALLL to impaired loans [1]

     3.29     0.29     —       21.84     12.22     13.41     8.30

General ALLL

   $ 280,334     $ 7,309     $ 33,102     $ 1,828     $ 74,708     $ 113,333     $ 510,614  

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

   $ 9,330,538     $ 211,048     $ 365,473     $ 535,642     $ 5,467,277     $ 3,735,509     $ 19,645,487  

General ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans [1]

     3.00     3.46     9.06     0.34     1.37     3.03     2.60

Total ALLL

   $ 297,682     $ 7,429     $ 33,102     $ 2,894     $ 149,375     $ 131,219     $ 621,701  

Total non-covered loans held-in-portfolio  [1]

   $ 9,858,202     $ 252,857     $ 384,217     $ 540,523     $ 6,078,507     $ 3,868,886     $ 20,983,192  

ALLL to loans held-in-portfolio [1]

     3.02     2.94     8.62     0.54     2.46     3.39     2.96

 

[1]

Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

[2]

Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. At December 31, 2012, the general allowance on the covered loans amounted to $100 million while the specific reserve amounted to $9 million.

[3]

The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA reportable segment.

Table 64 details the breakdown of the allowance for loan losses by loan categories. The breakdown is made for analytical purposes, and it is not necessarily indicative of the categories in which future loan losses may occur.

 

159


Table 64 - Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses

 

At December 31,

 
     2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

(Dollars in millions)

   ALLL      % of loans
in each
category to
total loans
    ALLL      % of loans
in each
category to
total loans
    ALLL      % of loans
in each
category to
total loans
    ALLL      % of loans
in each
category to
total loans
    ALLL      % of loans
in each
category to
total loans
 

Commercial

   $ 211.2        41.9   $ 175.0        46.4   $ 297.7        47.0   $ 369.4        48.4   $ 399.8        51.0

Construction

     6.7        1.3       5.3        1.0       7.4        1.2       8.5        1.2       39.8        1.6  

Legacy

     3.0        0.4       13.7        1.0       33.1        1.8       46.2        3.1       76.4        4.9  

Leasing

     7.1        2.9       10.6        2.5       2.9        2.6       4.7        2.7       7.2        2.8  

Mortgage

     123.3        33.5       156.9        30.9       149.4        29.0       102.3        26.8       70.9        21.8  

Consumer

     168.4        20.0       176.9        18.2       131.2        18.4       159.3        17.8       199.1        17.9  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total [1]

$ 519.7     100.0 $ 538.4     100.0 $ 621.7     100.0 $ 690.4     100.0 $ 793.2     100.0
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1]

Note: For purposes of this table the term loans refers to loans held-in-portfolio excluding covered loans and held-for-sale.

At December 31, 2014, the allowance for loan losses, excluding covered loans, decreased by approximately $19 million when compared with the same date in the previous year, mainly driven by a reserve release of $81 million in the BPNA segment, offset in part by higher reserve in the BPPR segment of $62 million. The general and specific reserves related to the non-covered loans totaled $380 million and $140 million, respectively, compared with $435 million and $104 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2013. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to loans held-in-portfolio was 2.68% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio at December 31, 2014, compared with 2.49% at December 31, 2013. The ratio of the allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was 82.43% at December 31, 2014, compared with 90.05% at December 31, 2013.

At December 31, 2014, the allowance for loan losses for non-covered loans at the BPPR segment totaled $489 million, or 3.07% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio, compared with $427 million, or 2.69% of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2013. The increase in the allowance was mostly driven by: (1) qualitative factors adjustments accounting for prevailing macroeconomic conditions in Puerto Rico and the public sector utilities exposures, (2) the effect of downgrades in the internal risk ratings of certain large corporate and public sector relationships, and (3) higher specific reserves. These increases were partially offset by a $14.9 million reserve release as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models. The ratio of the allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was 80.00% at December 31, 2014, compared with 95.42% at December 31, 2013.

The allowance for loan losses at the BPNA segment totaled $31 million, or 0.88% of loans held-in-portfolio, compared with $112 million, or 1.95% of loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2013. The decrease was mainly prompted by continued improvements in credit quality trends, $20 million reduction related to the sale of the regional operations, $35 million related to the sale or transfer to loans held-for-sale of certain classified and legacy loans during the second half of 2014, and a $3.8 million reserve release as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models during the second quarter of 2014. The ratio of the allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio was 160.13% at December 31, 2014, compared with 74.12% at December 31, 2013.

The allowance for loan losses for commercial loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $211 million, or 2.60% of that portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared with $175 million, or 1.74%, at December 31, 2013, and $298 million, or 3.02%, at December 31, 2012. The allowance for loan losses for the commercial loan portfolio in the BPPR segment, excluding the allowance for covered loans, totaled $202 million, or 3.16% of non-covered commercial loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared with $128 million, or 1.98%, at December 31, 2013. The increase in the allowance was mainly prompted by challenging economic conditions that persist in Puerto Rico, as mentioned above. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the commercial loan portfolio totaled $10 million, or 0.55% of commercial loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared with $47 million, or 1.31%, at December 31, 2013. This decrease in the allowance for loan losses in the BPNA segment

 

160


results from continued improvements in credit quality, the sale of its regional operations, the sale of certain classified and legacy loans, and a reserve release as part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models, as previously mentioned. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in-portfolio in the commercial loan category was 81.18% at December 31, 2014, compared with 62.71% at December 31, 2013 and 44.74% at December 31, 2012.

The allowance for loan losses for construction loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $7 million, or 2.65% of that portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared with $5 million, or 2.59%, at December 31, 2013, and $7 million, or 2.94%, at December 31, 2012. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the construction loan portfolio for the BPPR segment, excluding the allowance for covered loans, totaled $5 million, or 3.44% of non-covered construction loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared with $5 million, or 3.16%, at December 31, 2013. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the construction loan portfolio totaled $1 million, or 1.28% of construction loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared with $247 thousand, or 0.55%, at December 31, 2013. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in portfolio in the construction loan category was 48.29% at December 31, 2014, compared with 22.47% at December 31, 2013 and 17.14% at December 31, 2012. Stable allowance levels in the construction portfolio result from the de-risking strategies executed by the Corporation over the past several years to downsize its construction loan portfolio.

The allowance for loan losses for the legacy loans held-in-portfolio amounted to $3 million, or 3.64% of that portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared with $14 million, or 6.49%, at December 31, 2013, and $33 million, or 8.62%, at December 31, 2012. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses was primarily driven by improved credit performance, lower loan balances and lower non-performing loans. The ratio of allowance to non-performing loans held-in portfolio in the legacy loan category was 190.55% at December 31, 2014, compared with 91.06% at December 31, 2013 and 81.25% at December 31, 2012.

The allowance for loan losses for mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $123 million, or 1.90% of that portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared with $157 million, or 2.35%, at December 31, 2013, and $149 million, or 2.46%, at December 31, 2012. The allowance for loan losses corresponding to the mortgage loan portfolio at the BPPR segment totaled $121 million, or 2.22% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, excluding covered loans, at December 31, 2014 compared with $130 million, or 2.41%, respectively, at December 31, 2013. The decrease in the allowance arises from a lower environmental factors adjustment as a result of the annual review of the components of the ALLL model during the second quarter of 2014. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses corresponding to the mortgage loan portfolio totaled $2 million, or 0.23% of mortgage loans held-in-portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared with $27 million, or 2.08%, at December 31, 2013. The decrease in the allowance was mainly driven by the sale of certain classified loans, including mortgage TDRs and non-performing loans. The allowance for loan losses for BPNA’s non-conventional mortgage loan portfolio amounted to $2 million, or 0.61% of that particular loan portfolio, compared with $23 million, or 5.57%, at December 31, 2013. The Corporation is no longer originating non-conventional mortgage loans at BPNA.

The allowance for loan losses for the consumer portfolio, excluding covered loans, amounted to $168 million, or 4.35% of that portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared to $177 million, or 4.50%, at December 31, 2013, and $131 million, or 3.39%, at December 31, 2012. The allowance for loan losses of the non-covered consumer loan portfolio in the BPPR segment remained stable at $154 million, or 4.55% of that portfolio, at December 31, 2014, compared with $153 million, or 4.60%, at December 31, 2013. At the BPNA segment, the allowance for loan losses of the consumer loan portfolio totaled $14 million, or 2.98% of consumer loans, at December 31, 2014, compared with $24 million, or 3.95%, at December 31, 2013. The decrease in the allowance for loan losses for the consumer loan portfolio was principally driven by the sale of certain classified consumer loans.

The following table presents the Corporation’s recorded investment in non-covered loans that were considered impaired and the related valuation allowance at December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.

Table 65 - Impaired Loans (Non-Covered Loans) and the Related Valuation Allowance

 

     2014      2013      2012  

(In millions)

   Recorded
Investment [1]
     Valuation
Allowance [2]
     Recorded
Investment [1]
     Valuation
Allowance  [2]
     Recorded
Investment  [1]
     Valuation
Allowance  [2]
 

Impaired loans:

                 

Valuation allowance

   $ 831.5      $ 140.1      $ 642.6      $ 103.5      $ 897.6      $ 111.1  

No valuation allowance required

     95.5        —           266.1        —           440.1        —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

$ 927.0   $ 140.1   $ 908.7   $ 103.5   $ 1,337.7   $ 111.1  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

161


[1]

Excludes covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

[2]

Excludes the specific reserve related to covered loans acquired on the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction which amounted to $5 thousand at December 31, 2014 (2013 - $0.3 million; 2012 - $9 million).

With respect to the $96 million portfolio of the non-covered impaired loans for which no allowance for loan losses was required at December 31, 2014, management followed the guidance for specific impairment of a loan. When a loan is impaired, the measurement of the impairment may be based on: (1) the present value of the expected future cash flows of the impaired loan discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate; (2) the observable market price of the impaired loan; or (3) the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. A loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral. Impaired loans with no valuation allowance were mostly collateral dependent loans for which management charged-off specific reserves based on the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell.

Average non-covered impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $932 million and $1.1 billion, respectively. The Corporation recognized interest income on non-covered impaired loans of $35.1 million and $39.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.

The following tables set forth the activity in the specific reserves for non-covered impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Table 66 - Activity in Specific ALLL for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Legacy      Consumer     Leasing     Total  

Beginning balance

   $ 16,409     $ 177     $ 55,667     $ —        $ 30,200     $ 1,053     $ 103,506  

Provision for impaired loans (reversal of provision) - Continuing operations

     78,340       2,444       (276     —          13,800       (273     94,035  

Reversal of provision for impaired loans - Discontinued operations

     —         —         —         —          (70     —         (70

Net charge-offs

     (30,013     (2,258     (9,280     —          (15,769     (10     (57,330
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Specific allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2014

$ 64,736   $ 363   $ 46,111   $ —     $ 28,161   $ 770   $ 140,141  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Table 67 - Activity in Specific ALLL for the Year Ended December 31, 2013

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Legacy     Consumer     Leasing     Total  

Beginning balance

   $ 17,348     $ 120     $ 74,667     $ —       $ 17,886     $ 1,066     $ 111,087  

Provision for impaired loans (reversal of provision)

     176,104       4,776       70,336       1,248       19,089       (13     271,540  

Net charge-offs

     (115,741     (3,880     (13,668     (1,248     (6,775     —         (141,312

Net write-downs

     (61,302     (839     (75,668     —         —         —         (137,809
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Specific allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2013

$ 16,409   $ 177   $ 55,667   $ —     $ 30,200   $ 1,053   $ 103,506  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014, total net charge-offs for individually evaluated impaired loans amounted to approximately $57.3 million, of which $56.8 million pertained to the BPPR segment and $505 thousand to the BPNA segment. Most of these net charge-offs were related to the commercial loan portfolio.

The Corporation requests updated appraisal reports from pre-approved appraisers for loans that are considered impaired, and individually analyzes them following the Corporation’s reappraisal policy. This policy requires updated appraisals for loans secured by real estate (including construction loans) either annually or every two years depending on the total exposure of the borrower. As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals as part of the underwriting and approval process and also for credits considered impaired. Generally, the specialized appraisal review unit of the Corporation’s Credit Risk Management Division internally reviews appraisals following certain materiality benchmarks. In addition to evaluating the reasonability of the appraisal reports, these reviews monitor that appraisals are performed following the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (“USPAP”).

 

162


Appraisals may be adjusted due to age or general market conditions. The adjustments applied are based upon internal information, like other appraisals and/or loss severity information that can provide historical trends in the real estate market. Specifically, in commercial and construction impaired loans for the BPPR segment, and depending on the type of property and/or the age of the appraisal, downward adjustments currently range from 25% to 45% (including costs to sell). At December 31, 2014, the weighted average discount rate for the BPPR segment was 27%.

For commercial and construction loans at the BPNA segment, downward adjustments to the collateral value currently range from 10% to 40% depending on the age of the appraisals and the type, location and condition of the property. This discount used was determined based on a study of other real estate owned and loan sale transactions during the past two years, comparing net proceeds received by the bank relative to the most recent appraised value of the properties. However, additional haircuts can be applied depending upon the age of appraisal, the region and the condition of the project. Factors are based on appraisal changes and/or trends in loss severities. Discount rates discussed above include costs to sell and may change from time to time based on market conditions.

For mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties, a current assessment of value is made not later than 180 days past the contractual due date. Any outstanding balance in excess of the estimated value of the collateral property, less estimated costs to sell, is charged-off. For this purpose, the Corporation requests third-party Broker Price Opinion of Value “BPOs” of the subject collateral property at least annually. In the case of the mortgage loan portfolio for the BPPR segment, BPOs of the subject collateral properties are currently subject to downward adjustment of up to approximately 30%, including cost to sell of 5%. In the case of the U.S. mortgage loan portfolio, a 10% haircut is taken, which includes costs to sell.

Discount rates discussed above include costs to sell and may change from time to time based on market conditions.

The table that follows presents the approximate amount and percentage of non-covered impaired loans for which the Corporation relied on appraisals dated more than one year old for purposes of impairment requirements at December 31, 2014.

Table 68 - Non-Covered Impaired Loans With Appraisals Dated 1 Year Or Older

 

December 31, 2014

 
    Total Impaired Loans –
Held-in-portfolio (HIP)
       

(In thousands)

  Count     Outstanding Principal
Balance
    Impaired Loans with
Appraisals Over
One-Year Old [1]
 

Commercial

    140     $ 303,128       12

Construction

    6       10,693       79  

 

[1]

Based on outstanding balance of total impaired loans.

Table 69 - Non-Covered Impaired Loans With Appraisals Dated 1 Year Or Older

 

December 31, 2013

 
    Total Impaired Loans –
Held-in-portfolio (HIP)
       

(In thousands)

  Count     Outstanding Principal
Balance
    Impaired Loans with
Appraisals Over
One-Year Old [1]
 

Commercial

    174     $ 248,154       18

Construction

    9       20,162       27  

Legacy

    4       6,045       —    

 

[1]

Based on outstanding balance of total impaired loans.

The percentage of the Corporation’s impaired construction loans that were relied upon “as developed” and “as is” for the periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are presented in the tables below.

 

163


Table 70 - Impaired Construction Loans Relied Upon “As is” or “As Developed”

 

December 31, 2014

 
    “As is”     “As developed”  

(In thousands)

  Count     Amount in $     As a % of total
construction
impaired loans HIP
    Count     Amount in $     As a % of total
construction
impaired loans HIP
    Average % of
completion
 

Loans held-in-portfolio

    7     $ 7,653        58     2     $ 5,616        42     87

Table 71 - Impaired Construction Loans Relied Upon “As is” or “As Developed”

 

December 31, 2013

 
    “As is”     “As developed”  

(In thousands)

  Count     Amount in $     As a % of total
construction
impaired loans HIP
    Count     Amount in $     As a % of total
construction
impaired loans HIP
    Average % of
completion
 

Loans held-in-portfolio

    12     $ 18,835        77     2     $ 5,703        23     90

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation accounted for $6 million impaired construction loans under the “as developed” value. This approach is used since the current plan is that the project will be completed and it reflects the best strategy to reduce potential losses based on the prospects of the project. The costs to complete the project and the related increase in debt are considered an integral part of the individual reserve determination.

Costs to complete are deducted from the subject “as developed” collateral value on impaired construction loans. Impairment determinations are calculated following the collateral dependent method, comparing the outstanding principal balance of the respective impaired construction loan against the expected realizable value of the subject collateral. Realizable values of subject collaterals have been defined as the “as developed” appraised value less costs to complete, costs to sell and discount factors. Costs to complete represent an estimate of the amount of money to be disbursed to complete a particular phase of a construction project. Costs to sell have been determined as a percentage of the subject collateral value, to cover related collateral disposition costs (e.g. legal and commission fees). As discussed previously, discount factors may be applied to the appraised amounts due to age or general market conditions.

Allowance for loan losses – Covered loan portfolio

The Corporation’s allowance for loan losses for the covered loan portfolio acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction amounted to $82 million at December 31, 2014. This allowance covers the estimated credit loss exposure related to: (i) acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30, which required an allowance for loan losses of $79 million at December 31, 2014, compared with $94 million at December 31, 2013; and (ii) acquired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20, which required an allowance for loan losses of $3 million at December 31, 2014 and $8 million at December 31, 2013.

Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date for loans (pools) accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses in the current period. For purposes of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and new loans originated as a result of loan commitments assumed, the Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the accounting guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 (general reserve for inherent losses) and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment. Concurrently, the Corporation records an increase in the FDIC loss share asset for the expected reimbursement from the FDIC under the loss sharing agreements.

Enterprise Risk and Operational Risk Management

The Financial and Operational Risk Management Division (the “FORM Division”) is responsible for overseeing the implementation of the Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) framework, as well as developing and overseeing the implementation of risk programs and reporting that facilitate a broad integrated view of risks. The FORM Division also leads the ongoing development of a strong risk management culture and the framework that support effective risk governance. For new products and initiatives, the Corporate

 

164


Compliance Division has put in place processes to ensure that an appropriate standard readiness assessment is performed before launching a new product or initiative. Similar procedures are followed with the Treasury Division for transactions involving the purchase and sale of assets.

Operational risk can manifest itself in various ways, including errors, fraud, cyber attacks, business interruptions, inappropriate behavior of employees, and failure to perform in a timely manner, among others. These events can potentially result in financial losses and other damages to the Corporation, including reputational harm. The successful management of operational risk is particularly important to a diversified financial services company like Popular because of the nature, volume and complexity of its various businesses.

To monitor and control operational risk and mitigate related losses, the Corporation maintains a system of comprehensive policies and controls. The Corporation’s Operational Risk Committee (ORCO), which is composed of senior level representatives from the business lines and corporate functions, provides executive oversight to facilitate consistency of effective policies, best practices, controls and monitoring tools for managing and assessing all types of operational risks across the Corporation. The FORM Division, within the Corporation’s Risk Management Group, serves as ORCO’s operating arm and is responsible for establishing baseline processes to measure, monitor, limit and manage operational risk. In addition, the Auditing Division provides oversight about policy compliance and ensures adequate attention is paid to correct the identified issues.

Operational risks fall into two major categories: business specific and corporate-wide affecting all business lines. The primary responsibility for the day-to-day management of business specific risks relies on business unit managers. Accordingly, business unit managers are responsible for ensuring that appropriate risk containment measures, including corporate-wide or business segment specific policies and procedures, controls and monitoring tools, are in place to minimize risk occurrence and loss exposures. Examples of these include personnel management practices, data reconciliation processes, transaction processing monitoring and analysis and contingency plans for systems interruptions. To manage corporate-wide risks, specialized functions, such as Legal, Information Security, Business Continuity, and Finance and Compliance, among others, assist the business units in the development and implementation of risk management practices specific to the needs of the individual businesses.

Operational risk management plays a different role in each category. For business specific risks, the FORM Division works with the segments to ensure consistency in policies, processes, and assessments. With respect to corporate-wide risks, such as information security, business continuity, legal and compliance, the risks are assessed and a consolidated corporate view is developed and communicated to the business level. Procedures exist that are designed to ensure that policies relating to conduct, ethics, and business practices are followed. We continually monitor the system of internal controls, data processing systems, and corporate-wide processes and procedures to manage operational risk at appropriate, cost-effective levels. An additional level of review is applied to current and potential regulation and its impact on business processes, to ensure that appropriate controls are put in place to address regulation requirements. Today’s threats to customer information and information systems are complex, more wide spread, continually emerging, and increasing at a rapid pace. The Corporation continuously monitors these threats and, to date, we have not experienced any material losses as a result of cyber attacks.

ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AND ISSUED BUT NOT YET EFFECTIVE ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Refer to Note 3, “New Accounting Pronouncements” to the consolidated financial statements.

Adjusted results of operations – Non-GAAP financial measure

The Corporation prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements using accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”), the (“reported basis”). These financial statements appear on pages 177 to 181. In addition to analyzing the Corporation’s results on a reported basis, management monitors the performance of the Corporation on an “adjusted basis” and excludes the impact of certain transactions on the results of its operations. Throughout this MD&A, the Corporation presents a discussion of its financial results excluding the impact of these events to arrive at the “adjusted results”. Management believes that the “adjusted results” provide meaningful information about the underlying performance of the Corporation’s ongoing operations. The “adjusted results” are a Non-GAAP financial measure. Refer to Tables 72-74, for a reconciliation of the reported results to the “adjusted results” for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

165


Table 72 - Adjusted Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 (Non-GAAP)

 

     Year ended  
     31-Dec-14  
           2nd QTR     3rd QTR      4th QTR        

(In thousands)

   Actual
Results (US
GAAP)
    TARP
repayment
discount
amortization
and Income
Tax
adjustments
[2]
    BPNA
Reorganization
[3]
    BPNA
Reorganization
[3]
    Income Tax
Adjustments
[4]
    Indemnification
Assets
Adjustment [5]
     BPNA
Reorganization
[3]
    Other
Adjustments
    Adjusted
Results
(Non-GAAP)
 

Net interest income

   $ 945,072     $ (414,068   $ —       $ (20,663   $ —       $ —        $ (18,591   $ —       $ 1,398,394  

Provision for loan losses – non-covered loans

     223,999       —         —         11,950       —         —          878       —         211,171  

Provision for loan losses – covered loans [1]

     46,135       —         —         —         —         —          —         —         46,135  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  674,938     (414,068   —       (32,613   —       —       (19,469   —       1,141,088  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts and other service fees

  383,902     —       —       —       —       —       —       —       383,902  

Mortgage banking activities

  30,615     —       —       —       —       —       —       —       30,615  

Net loss and valuation adjustments on investments securities

  (870   —       —       —       —       —       —       —       (870

Trading account profit

  4,358     —       —       —       —       —       —       —       4,358  

Net gain (loss) on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

  40,591     —       —       —       —       —       1,684     —       38,907  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  (40,629   —       —       —       —       —       —       —       (40,629

FDIC loss share expense

  (103,024   —       —       —       —       12,492     —       —       (115,516

Other non-interest income

  71,572     —       —       —       —       —       —       —       71,572  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

  386,515     —       —       —       —       12,492     1,684     —       372,339  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Personnel costs

  418,679     —       —       —       —       —       —       2,974 [6]     415,705  

Net occupancy expenses

  86,707     —       —       —       —       —       —       1,895 [7]     84,812  

Other taxes

  56,918     —       —       —       —       —       —       —       56,918  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

  532     —       —       —       —       —       532     —       —    

Professional fees

  282,055     —       —       —       —       —       —       —       282,055  

FDIC deposit insurance

  40,307     —       —       —       —       —       —       —       40,307  

OREO expense

  49,611     —       —       —       —       —       —       —       49,611  

Restructuring costs

  26,725     —       4,574     8,290     —       —       13,861     —       —    

Other operating expenses

  232,150     —       —       —       —       —       —       —       232,150  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  1,193,684     —       4,574     8,290     —       —       14,393     4,869     1,161,558  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax

  (132,231   (414,068   (4,574   (40,903   —       12,492     (32,178   (4,869   351,869  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  58,279      (15,393 )   —        —        20,048      2,498     —        —        51,126  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations

$ (190,510 $ (398,675 $ (4,574 $ (40,903 $ (20,048 $ 9,994   $ (32,178 $ (4,869 $ 300,743  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax [8]

  (122,980   —       (193,363   20,949     —       —       6,534     —       42,900  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

$ (313,490 $ (398,675 $ (197,937 $ (19,954 $ (20,048 $ 9,994   $ (25,644 $ (4,869 $ 343,643  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

166


[1]

Covered loans represent loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements.

[2]

Income tax adjustments include a benefit of approximately $23.4 million related to a Closing Agreement with the PR Department of Treasury, completed during the second quarter of 2014 and the negative impact of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance of approximately $8.0 million recorded at the Holding Company, due to the difference in the tax treatment of the interest expense related to the TARP funds and the newly issued $450 million senior notes.

[3]

Includes the aggregated impact of $39.8 million refinancing fees of structured repos, net loss of $11.1 million in bulk loan sales and $26.7 million in restructuring incurred in connection with the reorganization of PCB.

[4]

On July 1, 2014, the Government of Puerto Rico approved an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code, which, among things, changed the income tax rate for capital gains from 15% to 20%. As a result, the Corporation recognized an income tax expense of $20.0 million, mainly related to the deferred tax liability associated with the portfolio acquired from Westernbank.

[5]

The FDIC indemnity assets amortization included a positive adjustment of $12.5 million to reverse the impact of accelerated amortization expense recorded in prior periods.

[6]

Represents the impact of the compensation package granted upon separation of an officer of the Corporation equal to approximately $3.0 million.

[7]

Represents the net loss on the early cancellation of a lease at BPNA of $1.9 million.

[8]

Adjustments included within loss from discontinued operations include approximately $186.5 million of goodwill impairment charge, $33.8 million in the net gain on the sale of the U.S. regional operations and approximately $13.7 million in transaction costs, which include severance payment expenses, legal and other professional services, among others incurred in connection with the agreements to sell the U.S. regional operations

Table 73 - Adjusted Consolidated Statement of Operations for the Year Ended December 31, 2013 (Non-GAAP)

 

     Year ended  
     31-Dec-13  
           1st QTR     2nd QTR     3rd QTR      4th QTR         

(In thousands)

   Actual
Results (US
GAAP)
    Impact of Sale
of NPAs [2]
    Impact of Sale
of NPLs
    Impact of
EVERTEC’s
IPO
     Income Tax
Adjustment
[3]
    Impact of
EVERTEC’s
SPO
     Impact of
EVERTEC’s
SPO
     Adjusted
Results
(Non-GAAP)
 

Net interest income

   $ 1,344,574     $ —       $ —       $ 1,502      $ —       $ —        $ —        $ 1,343,072  

Provision for loan losses – non-covered loans

     536,710       148,823       169,248       —          —         —          —          218,639  

Provision for loan losses – covered loans [1]

     69,396       —         —         —          —         —          —          69,396  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  738,468     (148,823   (169,248   1,502     —       —       —       1,055,037  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts and other service fees

  392,221     —       —       —       —       —       —       392,221  

Mortgage banking activities

  71,657     —       —       —       —       —       —       71,657  

Net gain and valuation adjustments on investments securities

  7,966     —       —       5,856     —       —       —       2,110  

Trading account loss

  (13,483   —       —       —       —       —       —       (13,483

Net (loss) gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

  (52,708   (61,387   (3,865   —       —       —       —       12,544  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  (37,054   (10,700   (3,047   —       —       —       —       (23,307

FDIC loss share expense

  (82,051   —       —       —       —       —       —       (82,051

Other non-interest income

  504,465     —       —       162,091     —       175,867     92,358     74,149  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

  791,013     (72,087   (6,912   167,947     —       175,867     92,358     433,840  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Personnel costs

  428,697      —        —        —        —        —        —        428,697  

Net occupancy expenses

  86,651     —       —       —       —       —       —       86,651  

Other taxes

  58,028     —       —       —       —       —       58,028  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

  3,388     3,388  

Professional fees

  278,127     5     —       856     —       250     —       277,016  

FDIC deposit insurance

  56,728     —       —       —       —       —       —       56,728  

OREO expense

  79,658     37,046     —       —       —       —       —       42,612  

Other operating expenses

  230,713     —       —       —       —       —       —       230,713  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  1,221,990     37,051     —       856     —       250     —       1,183,833  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax

  307,491     (257,961   (176,160   168,593     —       175,617     92,358     305,044  

Income tax (benefit) expense

  (251,327   (77,388   (68,987   11,988     (218,035   7,789     3,945     89,361  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

  558,818   $ (180,573 $ (107,173 $ 156,605   $ 218,035   $ 167,828   $ 88,413     215,683  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

  40,509     —       —       —       —       —       —       40,509  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$ 599,327   $ (180,573 $ (107,173 $ 156,605   $ 218,035   $ 167,828   $ 88,413   $ 256,192  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

167


[1]

Covered loans represent loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction that are covered under FDIC loss sharing agreements.

[2]

Net (loss) gain on sale of loans for the first quarter includes $8.8 million of negative valuation adjustments on loans held for sale which were transferred to held-in-portfolio subsequent to the sale.

[3]

Represents the net benefit of $215.6 million for the increase on the net deferred tax asset from the change of the corporate tax rate from 30% to 39% which includes the adjustment for the results of the first quarter of 2013, $7.9 million resulting from the adjustment in tax rate for distributions from EVERTEC from 15% to 4%, offset by an adjustment of $5.5 million on the deferred tax liability related to the covered loans portfolio.

Table 74 - Adjusted Consolidated Statement of Operations (Non-GAAP) - Comparative

 

     Adjusted Results (Non-GAAP)  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      Variance  

Net interest income

   $ 1,398,394      $ 1,343,072      $ 55,322  

Provision for loan losses – non-covered loans

     211,171        218,639        (7,468

Provision for loan losses – covered loans [1]

     46,135        69,396        (23,261
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  1,141,088     1,055,037     86,051  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts and other service fees

  383,902     392,221     (8,319

Mortgage banking activities

  30,615     71,657     (41,042

Net loss and valuation adjustments on investments securities

  (870   2,110     (2,980

Trading account profit

  4,358     (13,483   17,841  

Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

  38,907     12,544     26,363  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  (40,629   (23,307   (17,322

FDIC loss share expense

  (115,516   (82,051   (33,465

Other non-interest income

  71,572     74,149     (2,577
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

  372,339     433,840     (61,501
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Personnel costs

  415,705     428,697     (12,992

Net occupancy expenses

  84,812     86,651     (1,839

Other taxes

  56,918     58,028     (1,110

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

  —       3,388     (3,388

Professional fees

  282,055      277,016     5,039  

FDIC deposit insurance

  40,307     56,728     (16,421

OREO expense

  49,611     42,612     6,999  

Other operating expenses

  232,150     230,713     1,437  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  1,161,558     1,183,833     (22,275
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income tax

  351,869     305,044     46,825  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  51,126     89,361     (38,235
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

$ 300,743   $ 215,683   $ 85,060  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

$ 42,900   $ 40,509   $ 2,391  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$ 343,643   $ 256,192   $ 87,451  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

168


Statistical Summary 2010-2014

Statements of Financial Condition

 

     At December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

Assets:

          

Cash and due from banks

   $ 381,095     $ 423,211     $ 439,363     $ 535,282     $ 452,373  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Money market investments:

Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell

  151,134     181,020     246,977     327,668     181,961  

Time deposits with other banks

  1,671,252     677,433     838,603     1,048,506     797,334  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total money market investments

  1,822,386     858,453     1,085,580     1,376,174     979,295  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Trading account securities, at fair value

  138,527     339,743     314,525     436,331     546,713  

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

  5,315,159     5,294,800     5,084,201     5,009,823     5,236,852  

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost

  103,170     140,496     142,817     125,383     122,354  

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value

  161,906     181,752     185,443     179,880     163,513  

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value

  106,104     110,426     354,468     363,093     893,938  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  19,498,286     21,704,010     21,080,005     20,703,192     20,834,276  

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  2,542,662     2,984,427     3,755,972     4,348,703     4,836,882  

Less – Unearned income

  93,835     92,144     96,813     100,596     106,241  

Allowance for loan losses

  601,792     640,555     730,607     815,308     793,225  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio, net

  21,345,321     23,955,738     24,008,557     24,135,991     24,771,692  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FDIC loss share asset

  542,454     948,608     1,399,098     1,915,128     2,410,219  

Premises and equipment, net

  494,581     519,516     535,793     538,486     545,453  

Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  135,500     135,501     266,844     172,497     161,496  

Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  130,266     168,007     139,058     109,135     57,565  

Accrued income receivable

  121,818     131,536     125,728     125,209     150,658  

Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value

  148,694     161,099     154,430     151,323     166,907  

Other assets

  1,646,443     1,687,558     1,569,578     1,462,393     1,449,887  

Goodwill

  465,676     647,757     647,757     648,350     647,387  

Other intangible assets

  37,595     45,132     54,295     63,954     58,696  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 33,096,695   $ 35,749,333   $ 36,507,535   $ 37,348,432   $ 38,814,998  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Deposits:

Non-interest bearing

$ 5,783,748   $ 5,922,682   $ 5,794,629   $ 5,655,474   $ 4,939,321  

Interest bearing

  19,023,787     20,788,463     21,205,984     22,286,653     21,822,879  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deposits

  24,807,535     26,711,145     27,000,613     27,942,127     26,762,200  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

  1,271,657     1,659,292     2,016,752     2,141,097     2,412,550  

Other short-term borrowings

  21,200     401,200     636,200     296,200     364,222  

Notes payable

  1,711,828     1,584,754     1,777,721     1,856,372     4,170,183  

Other liabilities

  1,012,029     766,792     966,249     1,193,883     1,305,312  

Liabilities from discontinued operations

  5,064     —       —       —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  28,829,313     31,123,183     32,397,535     33,429,679     35,014,467  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock

  50,160     50,160     50,160     50,160     50,160  

Common stock

  1,036     1,034     1,032     1,026     1,023  

Surplus

  4,196,458     4,170,152     4,150,294     4,123,898     4,103,211  

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

  253,717     594,430     11,826     (212,726   (347,328

Treasury stock – at cost

  (4,117   (881   (444   (1,057   (574

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  (229,872   (188,745   (102,868   (42,548   (5,961
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

  4,267,382     4,626,150     4,110,000     3,918,753     3,800,531  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 33,096,695   $ 35,749,333   $ 36,507,535   $ 37,348,432   $ 38,814,998  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

169


Statistical Summary 2010-2014

Statements of Operations

 

     For the years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2012     2011     2010  

Interest income:

          

Loans

   $ 1,478,750     $ 1,481,096     $ 1,449,227     $ 1,561,377     $ 1,517,852  

Money market investments

     4,224       3,464       3,703       3,596       5,384  

Investment securities

     132,631       141,807       168,632       205,828       238,682  

Trading account securities

     17,938       21,573       22,824       35,607       27,918  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest income

  1,633,543     1,647,940     1,644,386     1,806,408     1,789,836  

Less - Interest expense

  688,471     303,366     362,759     484,860     622,246  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

  945,072     1,344,574     1,281,627     1,321,548     1,167,590  

Provision for loan losses - non-covered loans

  223,999     536,710     322,234     395,853     911,564  

Provision for loan losses - covered loans

  46,135     69,396     74,839     145,635     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  674,938     738,468     884,554     780,060     256,026  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Mortgage banking activities

  30,615     71,657     84,771     (4,505   16,153  

Net (loss) gain and valuation adjustments on investment securities

  (870   7,966     (1,707   10,844     3,992  

Trading account profit (loss)

  4,358     (13,483   4,478     48,098     33,017  

Net gain (loss) on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

  40,591     (52,708   (29,414   4,054     5,101  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves

  (40,629   (37,054   (21,198   (33,068   (72,013

FDIC loss share (expense) income

  (103,024   (82,051   (56,211   66,791     (25,751

Fair value change in equity appreciation instrument

  —       —       —       8,323     42,555  

Gain on sale of processing and technology business

  —       —       —       —       640,802  

Other non-interest income

  455,474     896,686     530,770     503,305     635,551  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

  386,515     791,013     511,489     603,842     1,279,407  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

  418,679     428,697     434,333     421,915     483,747  

All other operating expenses

  775,005     793,293     780,656     721,945     777,479  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  1,193,684     1,221,990     1,214,989     1,143,860     1,261,226  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations, before income tax

  (132,231   307,491     181,054     240,042     274,207  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  58,279     (251,327   (26,403   114,927     108,230  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations

$ (190,510 $ 558,818   $ 207,457   $ 125,115   $ 165,977  

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of income tax

  (122,980   40,509     37,818     26,210     (28,576
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income

$ (313,490 $ 599,327   $ 245,275   $ 151,325   $ 137,401  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income Applicable to Common Stock

$ (317,213 $ 595,604   $ 241,552   $ 147,602   $ (54,576
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

170


Statistical Summary 2010-2014

Average Balance Sheet and Summary of Net Interest Income

 

On a Taxable Equivalent Basis*

                                                            
     2014     2013     2012  
(Dollars in thousands)    Average
Balance
     Interest      Average
Rate
    Average
Balance
     Interest      Average
Rate
    Average
Balance
     Interest      Average
Rate
 

Assets

                        

Interest earning assets:

                        

Money market investments

   $ 1,305,326      $ 4,224        0.32   $ 1,036,495      $ 3,464        0.33   $ 1,051,373      $ 3,704        0.35
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury securities

  264,393     4,730     1.79     37,429     1,505     4.02     34,757     1,418     4.08  

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

  2,006,170     31,913     1.59     1,273,766     28,926     2.27     1,038,829     34,881     3.36  

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

  188,125     13,450     7.15     172,403     12,295     7.13     152,697     9,850     6.45  

Collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed securities

  3,231,806     101,650     3.15     3,758,610     106,377     2.83     3,752,954     121,494     3.24  

Other

  195,139     10,265     5.26     245,980     12,765     5.19     247,717     14,451     5.83  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities

  5,885,633     162,008     2.75     5,488,188     161,868     2.95     5,226,954     182,094     3.48  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Trading account securities

  339,563     20,914     6.16     416,538     26,026     6.25     445,881     25,909     5.81  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-covered loans

  19,595,972     1,239,469     6.33     19,572,159     1,218,349     6.22     18,736,207     1,168,091     6.23  

Covered loans

  2,770,779     293,610     10.60     3,227,719     300,745     9.32     4,050,338     301,441     7.44  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans (net of unearned income)

  22,366,751     1,533,079     6.85     22,799,878     1,519,094     6.66     22,786,545     1,469,532     6.45  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest earning assets/Interest income

$ 29,897,273   $ 1,720,225     5.75 $ 29,741,099   $ 1,710,452     5.75 $ 29,510,753   $ 1,681,239     5.70
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest earning assets

  3,758,897     4,362,183     4,486,835  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets from continuing operations

$ 33,656,170   $ 34,103,282   $ 33,997,588  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets from discontinued operations

  1,525,687     —       —       2,163,711     —       —       2,266,443     —       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 35,181,857   $ 36,266,993   $ 36,264,031  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Interest bearing liabilities:

Savings, NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand accounts

$ 11,557,597   $ 30,187     0.26 $ 11,243,095   $ 31,080     0.28 $ 10,834,812   $ 40,069     0.37

Time deposits

  7,556,109     74,900     0.99     7,956,922     93,777     1.18     8,835,308     127,696     1.45  

Short-term borrowings

  1,886,662     67,376     3.57     2,571,875     38,430     1.49     2,563,970     46,802     1.83  

Notes payable

  1,627,541     516,008     31.70     1,719,985     140,079     8.14     1,850,514     148,192     8.01  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest bearing liabilities/Interest expense

  22,627,909     688,471     3.04     23,491,877     303,366     1.29     24,084,604     362,759     1.51  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest bearing liabilities

  6,409,810     6,390,174     6,130,890  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities from continuing operations

  29,037,719     29,882,051     30,215,494  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities from discontinued operations

  1,588,386     —       —       2,208,593     —       —       2,204,885     —       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  30,626,105     32,090,644     32,420,379  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

  4,555,752     4,176,349     3,843,652  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 35,181,857   $ 36,266,993   $ 36,264,031  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis

$ 1,031,754   $ 1,407,086   $ 1,318,480  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cost of funding earning assets

  2.30   1.02   1.23
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest margin

  3.45   4.73   4.47
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Effect of the taxable equivalent adjustment

  86,682     62,512     36,853  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income per books

$ 945,072   $ 1,344,574   $ 1,281,627  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

*

Shows the effect of the tax exempt status of some loans and investments on their yield, using the applicable statutory income tax rates. The computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code. This adjustment is shown in order to compare the yields of the tax exempt and taxable assets on a taxable basis.

Note: Average loan balances include the average balance of non-accruing loans. No interest income is recognized for these loans in accordance with the Corporation’s policy.

 

171


Statistical Summary 2010-2014

Average Balance Sheet and Summary of Net Interest Income

 

On a Taxable Equivalent Basis

                                        
     2011     2010  
(Dollars in thousands)    Average
Balance
     Interest      Average
Rate
    Average
Balance
     Interest      Average
Rate
 

Assets

                

Interest earning assets:

                

Money market investments

   $ 1,152,014      $ 3,597        0.31   $ 1,539,046      $ 5,384        0.35
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury securities

  50,971     1,502     2.95     80,740     1,527     1.89  

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

  1,180,680     49,781     4.22     1,473,227     54,748     3.72  

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

  139,847     8,972     6.42     228,291     11,171     4.89  

Collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage-backed securities

  3,896,743     148,884     3.82     4,340,545     160,632     3.70  

Other

  226,033     15,213     6.73     176,766     11,048     6.25  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities

  5,494,274     224,352     4.08     6,299,569     239,126     3.80  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Trading account securities

  667,277     38,850     5.82     493,628     32,333     6.55  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-covered loans

  18,543,619     1,168,446     6.30     19,595,062     1,218,988     6.22  

Covered loans

  4,613,361     412,678     8.95     3,364,932     303,096     9.01  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans (net of unearned income)

  23,156,980     1,581,124     6.83     22,959,994     1,522,084     6.63  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest earning assets/Interest income

$ 30,470,545   $ 1,847,923     6.06 $ 31,292,237   $ 1,798,927     5.75
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest earning assets

  4,958,125     4,037,238  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets from continuing operations

$ 35,428,670   $ 35,329,475  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets from discontinued operations

  2,637,598     —       —       3,049,491     —       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 38,066,268   $ 38,378,966  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Interest bearing liabilities:

Savings, NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand accounts

$ 10,204,438   $ 61,004     0.60 $ 9,578,557   $ 82,048     0.86

Time deposits

  10,233,566     187,838     1.84     10,117,636     237,708     2.35  

Short-term borrowings

  2,628,511     55,255     2.10     2,396,645     60,268     2.51  

Notes payable

  1,834,915     148,603     8.10     2,293,878     183,701     8.01  

Note issued to the FDIC

  1,381,981     32,161     2.33     2,753,490     58,521     2.13  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest bearing liabilities/Interest expense

  26,283,411     484,861     1.84     27,140,206     622,246     2.29  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest bearing liabilities

  5,728,630     5,447,916  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities from continuing operations

  32,012,041     32,588,122  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities from discontinued operations

  2,321,391     —       —       2,531,677     —       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  34,333,432     35,119,799  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity

  3,732,836     3,259,167  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 38,066,268   $ 38,378,966  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis

$ 1,363,062   $ 1,176,681  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cost of funding earning assets

  1.59   1.99
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest margin

  4.47   3.76
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Effect of the taxable equivalent adjustment

  41,515     9,092  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income per books

$ 1,321,547   $ 1,167,589  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

*

Shows the effect of the tax exempt status of loans and investments on their yield, using the applicable statutory income tax rates. The computation considers the interest expense disallowance required by the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code. This adjustment is shown in order to compare the yield of the tax exempt and taxable assets on a taxable basis.

Note: Average loan balances include the average balance of non-accruing loans. No interest income is recognized for these loans in accordance with the Corporation’s policy.

 

172


Statistical Summary 2013-2014

Quarterly Financial Data

 

     2014     2013 [1]  

(In thousands, except per common share
information)

   Fourth
Quarter
    Third
Quarter
    Second
Quarter
    First
Quarter
    Fourth
Quarter
    Third
Quarter
    Second
Quarter
    First
Quarter
 

Summary of Operations

                

Interest income

   $ 391,935      $ 401,199      $ 421,450      $ 418,959      $ 424,525      $ 405,918     $ 412,689     $ 404,808  

Interest expense

     65,074       74,778       480,831       67,788       70,018       74,906       78,278       80,164  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

  326,861     326,421     (59,381   351,171     354,507     331,012     334,411     324,644  

Provision for loan losses - non-covered loans

  51,637     68,166     50,074     54,122     49,927     48,715     228,975     209,093  

Provision for loan losses - covered loans

  (3,646   12,463     11,604     25,714     8,907     17,433     25,500     17,556  

Mortgage banking activities

  8,747     14,402     3,788     3,678     14,387     18,892     18,081     20,297  

Net gain (loss) and valuation adjustments on investment securities

  893     (1,763   —       —       2,110     —       5,856     —    

Trading account profit (loss)

  586     740     1,055     1,977     (1,547   (6,607   (4,345   (984

Gain (loss) on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

  10,946     15,593     9,659     4,393     3,346     2,374     4,291     (62,719

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  (13,348   (9,480   (7,454   (10,347   (6,892   (2,387   (11,632   (16,143

FDIC loss share (expense) income

  (18,693   (4,864   (55,261   (24,206   (37,164   (14,866   (3,755   (26,266

Other non-interest income

  114,233     109,702     111,002     120,537     211,036     289,303     280,222     116,125  

Operating expenses

  330,006     310,640     275,439     277,599     304,609     308,292     293,864     315,225  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax

  52,228     59,482     (333,709   89,768     176,340     243,281     74,790     (186,920

Income tax expense (benefit)

  12,472     26,667     (4,124   23,264     25,162     17,768     (237,380   (56,877
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$ 39,756    $ 32,815    $ (329,585 $ 66,504    $ 151,178    $ 225,513   $ 312,170   $ (130,043
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax

  9,086     29,758     (181,729   19,905     11,853     3,622     15,298     9,736  

Net income (loss)

$ 48,842    $ 62,573    $ (511,314 )$    86,409    $ 163,031    $ 229,135   $ 327,468   $ (120,307
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) applicable to common stock

$ 47,911    $ 61,643    $ (512,245 )$    85,478    $ 162,100    $ 228,204   $ 326,537   $ (121,237
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share - basic:

$ 0.47   $ 0.60   $ (4.98 )$   0.83   $ 1.58   $ 2.22   $ 3.18   $ (1.18
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share - diluted:

$ 0.46   $ 0.60   $ (4.98 )$   0.83   $ 1.57   $ 2.22   $ 3.17   $ (1.18
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Selected Average Balances

(In millions)

Total assets

$ 33,309    $ 35,024    $ 36,236    $ 36,196    $ 33,773    $ 34,195   $ 34,678   $ 34,334  

Loans

  22,044     22,263     22,563     22,604     22,625     22,710     23,068     22,798  

Interest earning assets

  29,265     29,764     30,402     30,169     29,664     29,523     30,011     29,769  

Deposits

  24,629     24,656     24,775     24,559     24,559     24,382     24,742     24,638  

Interest-bearing liabilities

  21,977     22,776     22,933     22,834     22,876     23,390     23,833     23,881  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Selected Ratios

Return on assets

  0.58   0.71   -5.66   0.97   1.79   2.51 %   3.60 %   -1.34

Return on equity

  4.41     5.75     -43.04     7.39     14.59     21.64     32.77     -12.58  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

[1]

Per share data has been adjusted to retroactively reflect the 1-for-10 reverse stock split effected on May 29, 2012.

Note: Because each reporting period stands on its own the sum of the net income (loss) per common share for the quarters may not equal to the net income (loss) per common share for the year .

 

173


 

LOGO

Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Popular, Inc. (the Corporation) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a - 15(f) and 15d - 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and for our assessment of internal control over financial reporting. The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and includes controls over the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the instructions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA). The Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

(i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Corporation;

(ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the Corporation are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Corporation; and

(iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Corporation’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The management of Popular, Inc. has assessed the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

Based on our assessment, management concluded that the Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014 based on the criteria referred to above.

The Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, has audited the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, as stated in their report dated March 2, 2015 which appears herein.

 

LOGO LOGO
Richard L. Carrión Carlos J. Vázquez
Chairman of the Board Executive Vice President
and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

174


LOGO

Report of Independent Registered

Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Popular, Inc.

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive (loss) income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Popular, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Corporation’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Report of Management on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Management’s assessment

 

175


and our audit of Popular, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting also included controls over the preparation of financial statements in accordance with the instructions to the Consolidated Financial Statements for Bank Holding Companies (Form FR Y-9C) to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 112 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (FDICIA). A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

LOGO

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

San Juan, Puerto Rico

March 2, 2015

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

(OF PUERTO RICO)

License No. LLP-216 Expires Dec. 1, 2016

Stamp E139737 of the P.R.

Society of Certified Public

Accountants has been affixed

to the file copy of this report

 

176


POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION

 

(In thousands, except share information)

   December 31,
2014
    December 31,
2013
 

Assets:

    

Cash and due from banks

   $ 381,095     $ 423,211  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Money market investments:

Federal funds sold

  —       5,055  

Securities purchased under agreements to resell

  151,134     175,965  

Time deposits with other banks

  1,671,252     677,433  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total money market investments

  1,822,386     858,453  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Trading account securities, at fair value:

Pledged securities with creditors’ right to repledge

  80,945     308,978  

Other trading securities

  57,582     30,765  

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value:

Pledged securities with creditors’ right to repledge

  1,020,529     1,286,839  

Other investment securities available-for-sale

  4,294,630     4,007,961  

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value 2014 - $94,199; 2013 - $120,688)

  103,170     140,496  

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (realizable value 2014 - $165,024; 2013 - $184,526)

  161,906     181,752  

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value

  106,104     110,426  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  19,498,286     21,704,010  

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  2,542,662     2,984,427  

Less – Unearned income

  93,835     92,144  

   Allowance for loan losses

  601,792     640,555  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio, net

  21,345,321     23,955,738  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

FDIC loss share asset

  542,454     948,608  

Premises and equipment, net

  494,581     519,516  

Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  135,500     135,501  

Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  130,266     168,007  

Accrued income receivable

  121,818     131,536  

Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value

  148,694     161,099  

Other assets

  1,646,443     1,687,558  

Goodwill

  465,676     647,757  

Other intangible assets

  37,595     45,132  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 33,096,695   $ 35,749,333  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Deposits:

Non-interest bearing

$ 5,783,748   $ 5,922,682  

Interest bearing

  19,023,787     20,788,463  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deposits

  24,807,535     26,711,145  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

  1,271,657     1,659,292  

Other short-term borrowings

  21,200     401,200  

Notes payable

  1,711,828     1,584,754  

Other liabilities

  1,012,029     766,792  

Liabilities from discontinued operations (Refer to Note 4)

  5,064     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  28,829,313     31,123,183  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Refer to Note 31)

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, 30,000,000 shares authorized; 2,006,391 shares issued and outstanding

  50,160     50,160  

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 170,000,000 shares authorized; 103,614,553 shares issued (2013 – 103,435,967) and 103,476,847 shares outstanding (2013 – 103,397,699)

  1,036     1,034  

Surplus

  4,196,458     4,170,152  

Retained earnings

  253,717     594,430  

Treasury stock – at cost, 137,706 shares (2013 – 38,268)

  (4,117   (881

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  (229,872   (188,745
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

  4,267,382     4,626,150  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 33,096,695   $ 35,749,333  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

177


POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands, except per share information)

   2014     2013     2012  

Interest income:

      

Loans

   $ 1,478,750     $ 1,481,096     $ 1,449,227  

Money market investments

     4,224       3,464       3,703  

Investment securities

     132,631       141,807       168,632  

Trading account securities

     17,938       21,573       22,824  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest income

  1,633,543     1,647,940     1,644,386  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense:

Deposits

  105,087     124,857     167,765  

Short-term borrowings

  67,376     38,430     46,802  

Long-term debt

  516,008     140,079     148,192  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

  688,471     303,366     362,759  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

  945,072     1,344,574     1,281,627  

Provision for loan losses - non-covered loans

  223,999     536,710     322,234  

Provision for loan losses - covered loans

  46,135     69,396     74,839  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

  674,938     738,468     884,554  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

  158,637     162,870     171,226  

Other service fees (Refer to Note 40)

  225,265     229,351     232,515  

Mortgage banking activities (Refer to Note 14)

  30,615     71,657     84,771  

Net (loss) gain and valuation adjustments on investment securities

  (870   7,966     (1,707

Trading account profit (loss)

  4,358     (13,483   4,478  

Net gain (loss) on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

  40,591     (52,708   (29,414

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  (40,629   (37,054   (21,198

FDIC loss share (expense) income (Refer to Note 41)

  (103,024   (82,051   (56,211

Other operating income

  71,572     504,465     127,029  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

  386,515     791,013     511,489  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

  418,679     428,697     434,333  

Net occupancy expenses

  86,707     86,651     84,687  

Equipment expenses

  48,917     46,028     43,618  

Other taxes

  56,918     58,028     49,844  

Professional fees

  282,055     278,127     271,008  

Communications

  25,684     25,385     25,687  

Business promotion

  54,016     59,453     60,784  

FDIC deposit insurance

  40,307     56,728     82,065  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

  532     3,388     25,196  

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

  49,611     79,658     28,823  

Other operating expenses

  95,373     91,876     100,783  

Amortization of intangibles

  8,160     7,971     8,161  

Restructuring costs (Refer to Note 5)

  26,725     —       —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  1,193,684     1,221,990     1,214,989  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations before income tax

  (132,231   307,491     181,054  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  58,279     (251,327   (26,403
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations

  (190,510   558,818     207,457  

(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax (Refer to Note 4)

  (122,980   40,509     37,818  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income

$ (313,490 $ 599,327   $ 245,275  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income Applicable to Common Stock

$ (317,213 $ 595,604   $ 241,552  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share – Basic

Net (loss) income from continuing operations

  (1.88   5.41     1.99  

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

  (1.20   0.39     0.37  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share – Basic

$ (3.08 $ 5.80   $ 2.36  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share – Diluted

Net (loss) income from continuing operations

  (1.88   5.39     1.98  

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

  (1.20   0.39     0.37  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share – Diluted

$ (3.08 $ 5.78   $ 2.35  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

178


POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2012  

Net (loss) income

   $ (313,490   $ 599,327     $ 245,275  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss before tax:

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  (4,451   (4,822   (2,448

Reclassification adjustment for losses included in net income

  7,718     —       —    

Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans

  (160,679   174,578     (39,978

Amortization of net losses

  (8,505   24,674     25,159  

Amortization of prior service cost

  3,800     —       (200

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments arising during the period

  57,401     (221,043   (59,484

Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income

  870     (2,110   1,707  

Unrealized net (losses) gains on cash flow hedges

  (6,613   2,286     (13,509

Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) included in net income

  6,091     (1,839   14,119  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss before tax

  (104,368   (28,276   (74,634

Income tax benefit (expense)

  63,241     (57,601   14,314  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  (41,127   (85,877   (60,320
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

$ (354,617 $ 513,450   $ 184,955  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Tax effect allocated to each component of other comprehensive (loss) income:

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2012  

Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans

   $ 62,664     $ (70,306   $ 12,279  

Amortization of net losses

     3,317       (7,402     (7,108

Amortization of prior service cost

     (1,482     —         60  

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on investments arising during the period

     (1,414     19,924       9,280  

Reclassification adjustment for (gains) losses included in net income

     (48     317       (13

Unrealized net (losses) gains on cash flow hedges

     2,579       (850     4,052  

Reclassification adjustment for net (gains) losses included in net income

     (2,375     716       (4,236
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax benefit (expense)

$ 63,241   $ (57,601 $ 14,314  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

179


POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

(In thousands)

   Common
stock [1]
     Preferred
stock
     Surplus [1]     (Accumulated
deficit)
Retained
earnings
    Treasury
stock
    Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
    Total  

Balance at December 31, 2011

   $ 1,026      $ 50,160      $ 4,123,898     $ (212,726   $ (1,057   $ (42,548   $ 3,918,753  

Net income

             245,275           245,275  

Issuance of stock

     6           9,396             9,402  

Dividends declared:

                

Preferred stock

             (3,723         (3,723

Common stock purchases

               (450       (450

Common stock reissuance

               1,063         1,063  

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

                 (60,320     (60,320

Transfer to statutory reserve

           17,000       (17,000         —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

$ 1,032   $ 50,160   $ 4,150,294   $ 11,826   $ (444 $ (102,868 $ 4,110,000  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  599,327     599,327  

Issuance of stock

  2     6,858     6,860  

Dividends declared:

Preferred stock

  (3,723   (3,723

Common stock purchases

  (470   (470

Common stock reissuance

  33     33  

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  (85,877   (85,877

Transfer to statutory reserve

  13,000     (13,000   —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

$ 1,034   $ 50,160   $ 4,170,152   $ 594,430   $ (881 $ (188,745 $ 4,626,150  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss

  (313,490   (313,490

Issuance of stock

  2     5,392     5,394  

Tax windfall benefit on vesting of restricted stock

  414     414  

Repurchase of TARP-related warrants

  (3,000   (3,000

Dividends declared:

Preferred stock

  (3,723   (3,723

Common stock purchases

  (3,272   (3,272

Common stock reissuance

  36     36  

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  (41,127   (41,127

Transfer to statutory reserve

  23,500     (23,500   —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

$ 1,036   $ 50,160   $ 4,196,458   $ 253,717   $ (4,117 $ (229,872 $ 4,267,382  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     Year ended December 31,  

Disclosure of changes in number of shares: [1]

   2014     2013     2012  

Preferred Stock:

      
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at beginning and end of year

  2,006,391     2,006,391     2,006,391  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Common Stock:

Balance at beginning of year

  103,435,967     103,193,303     102,634,640  

Issuance of stock

  178,586     242,664     558,663  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

  103,614,553     103,435,967     103,193,303  

Treasury stock

  (137,706   (38,268   (23,497
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Common Stock – Outstanding

  103,476,847     103,397,699     103,169,806  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

180


POPULAR, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

     Year ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2012  

Cash flows from operating activities:

      

Net (loss) income

   $ (313,490   $ 599,327     $ 245,275  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Provision for loan losses

  263,369     602,563     408,941  

Goodwill impairment losses

  186,511     —       —    

Amortization of intangibles

  9,434     9,883     10,072  

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

  47,137     48,162     46,736  

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

  278,576     (79,004   (37,899

Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights

  24,683     11,403     17,406  

FDIC loss share expense

  103,024     82,051     56,211  

Amortization of prepaid FDIC assessment

  —       —       32,778  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  40,629     37,054     21,198  

Earnings from investments under the equity method

  (39,578   (42,873   (73,478

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

  43,512     (288,754   (135,491

(Gain) loss on:

Disposition of premises and equipment

  (1,716   (3,392   (8,619

Sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities

  870     (2,110   1,707  

Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale and mortgage banking activities

  (88,724   22,411     (48,765

Sale of stock in equity method investee

  —       (416,113   —    

Sale of other assets

  —       —       (2,545

Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs

  28,005     50,740     (4,511

Disposal of discontinued business

  (38,355   —       —    

Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale

  (308,600   (390,018   (417,108

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale

  123,375     218,379     325,014  

Net originations on loans held-for-sale

  (753,312   (1,049,474   (1,233,240

Net (increase) decrease in:

Trading securities

  1,105,374     1,430,835     1,387,910  

Accrued income receivable

  9,719     (5,809   (519

Other assets

  132,500     2,827     (19,390

Net increase (decrease) in:

Interest payable

  (707   (2,466   (9,164

Pension and other postretirement benefits obligation

  (10,171   10,635     (40,241

Other liabilities

  30,937     (26,952   1,848  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total adjustments

  1,186,492     219,978     278,851  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  873,002     819,305     524,126  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net (increase) decrease in money market investments

  (963,933   227,127     290,594  

Purchases of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  (2,001,940   (2,257,976   (1,843,922

Held-to-maturity

  (1,000   (250   (25,792

Other

  (110,010   (178,093   (212,419

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  1,722,650     1,823,474     1,636,723  

Held-to-maturity

  39,962     4,632     9,751  

Other

  92,752     181,784     206,856  

Proceeds from sale of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  310,210     5,438     52,058  

Other

  37,104     —       —    

Net repayments on loans

  775,900     680,819     629,006  

Proceeds from sale of loans

  355,145     333,021     68,396  

Acquisition of loan portfolios

  (389,067   (1,592,603   (1,357,628

Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements

  256,498     396,223     462,016  

Cash paid related to business acquisitions

  (6,330   —       —    

Return of capital from equity method investments

  —       491     151,196  

Proceeds from sale of stock in equity method investee

  —       481,377     —    

Net cash disbursed from disposal of discontinued business

  (205,895   —       —    

Mortgage servicing rights purchased

  —       (45   (2,231

Acquisition of premises and equipment

  (51,046   (38,573   (54,899

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment

  14,337     10,090     19,841  

Other productive assets

  —       —       1,026  

Foreclosed assets

  150,115     226,063      206,070   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

  25,452     302,999     236,642  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in:

Deposits

  109,015     (323,404   (969,596

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

  (387,635   (357,460   (124,345

Other short-term borrowings

  (380,000   (235,000   340,000  

Payments of notes payable

  (1,059,290   (332,031   (214,898

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

  781,905     106,739     106,923  

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  5,394     6,860     9,402  

Dividends paid

  (3,723   (3,723   (3,723

Repurchase of TARP - related warrants

  (3,000   —       —    

Net payments for repurchase of common stock

  (3,236   (437   (450
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

  (940,570   (1,138,456   (856,687
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and due from banks

  (42,116   (16,152   (95,919

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  423,211     439,363     535,282  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 381,095   $ 423,211   $ 439,363  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the periods ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 include the cash flows from operating, investing and finance activities associated with discontinued operations.

 

181


Notes to Consolidated Financial

Statements

 

Note 1 -

Nature of Operations and Basis of Presentation

  183   

Note 2 -

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

  184   

Note 3 -

New Accounting Pronouncements

  197   

Note 4 -

Discontinued Operations

  201   

Note 5 -

Restructuring Plan

  202   

Note 6 -

Restrictions on Cash and Due from Banks and Certain Securities

  203   

Note 7 -

Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell

  203   

Note 8 -

Pledged Assets

  204   

Note 9 -

Investment Securities Available-For-Sale

  205   

Note 10 -

Investment Securities Held-to-Maturity

  208   

Note 11 -

Loans

  210   

Note 12 -

Allowance for Loan Losses

  220   

Note 13 -

FDIC Loss Share Asset and True-Up Payment Obligation

  241   

Note 14 -

Mortgage Banking Activities

  243   

Note 15 -

Transfers of Financial Assets and Servicing Assets

  244   

Note 16 -

Premises and Equipment

  249   

Note 17 -

Other Real Estate Owned

  249   

Note 18 -

Other Assets

  250   

Note 19 -

Investment in Equity Investees

  251   

Note 20 -

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

  251   

Note 21 -

Deposits

  255   

Note 22 -

Federal Funds Purchased and Assets Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase

  256   

Note 23 -

Other Short-Term Borrowings

  257   

Note 24 -

Notes Payable

  258   

Note 25 -

Offsetting of Financial Assets and Liabilities

  259   

Note 26 -

Trust Preferred Securities

  260   

Note 27 -

Stockholders’ Equity

  262   

Note 28 -

Regulatory Capital Requirements

  264   

Note 29 -

Other Comprehensive Loss

  266   

Note 30 -

Guarantees

  268   

Note 31 -

Commitments and Contingencies

  271   

Note 32 -

Non-consolidated Variable Interest Entities

  277   

Note 33 -

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

  280   

Note 34 -

Related Party Transactions

  284   

Note 35 -

Fair Value Measurement

  289   

Note 36 -

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

  297   

Note 37 -

Employee Benefits

  303   

Note 38 -

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share

  312   

Note 39 -

Rental Expense and Commitments

  313   

Note 40 -

Other Service Fees

  313   

Note 41 -

FDIC Loss Share (Expense) Income

  314   

Note 42 -

Stock-Based Compensation

  314   

Note 43 -

Income Taxes

  317   

Note 44 -

Supplemental Disclosure on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

  321   

Note 45 -

Segment Reporting

  322   

Note 46 -

Subsequent Events

  327   

Note 47 -

Popular, Inc. (Holding company only) Financial Information

  327   

Note 48 -

Condensed Consolidating Financial Information of Guarantor and Issuers of Registered Guaranteed Securities

  330   

 

182


Note 1 – Nature of operations and basis of presentation

Nature of Operations

Popular, Inc. (the “Corporation”) is a diversified, publicly owned financial holding company subject to the supervision and regulation of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Corporation has operations in Puerto Rico, the United States and the Caribbean. In Puerto Rico, the Corporation provides commercial and retail banking services, including mortgage loan originations, through its principal banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), as well as investment banking, broker-dealer, auto and equipment leasing and financing, and insurance services through specialized subsidiaries. In the U.S. mainland, the Corporation operates Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary E-LOAN. BPNA focuses efforts and resources on the core community banking business. BPNA operates branches in New York, New Jersey and South Florida. E-LOAN markets deposit accounts under its name for the benefit of BPNA. Refer to Note 4 for discussion of the sales of the Illinois, Central Florida and California regional operations during the year ended December 31, 2014. The BPNA branches operate under the name of Popular Community Bank. Note 45 to the consolidated financial statements presents information about the Corporation’s business segments.

On April 30, 2010, BPPR entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”) to acquire certain assets and assume certain deposits and liabilities of Westernbank Puerto Rico (“Westernbank”), a Puerto Rico state-chartered bank headquartered in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico (the “Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction”). Westernbank was a wholly-owned commercial bank subsidiary of W Holding Company, Inc. and operated in Puerto Rico. Refer to Note 13 – FDIC loss share assets and true-up payment obligation, to these consolidated financial statements for detailed information on this business combination.

Basis of Presentation

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2012 and 2013 consolidated financial statements and notes to the financial statements to conform with the 2014 presentation. As discussed in Note 4, current and prior periods presented in the consolidated statement of operations as well as the related note disclosures covering income and expense amounts have been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. The consolidated statement of financial condition and related note disclosure for prior periods do not reflect the reclassification of BPNA’s assets and liabilities to discontinued operations.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation recorded an out-of-period adjustment to correct an error in the amortization expense of the FDIC indemnification asset recorded during the years 2012 and 2013. The FDIC indemnity asset amortization for the year ended December 31, 2014, included a benefit of approximately $12.5 million to reverse the impact of accelerated amortization expense recorded during prior periods. This amount will be recognized as expense over the remaining portion of the Loss Sharing Agreement that expires in the quarter ending June 30, 2015. After evaluating the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the error and the out-of-period adjustment to the Corporation’s financial results, management has determined that the misstatement and the out-of-period adjustment are not material to the 2012, 2013 and 2014 financial statements, respectively.

 

183


Note 2 – Summary of significant accounting policies

The accounting and financial reporting policies of Popular, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Corporation”) conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and with prevailing practices within the financial services industry.

The following is a description of the most significant of these policies:

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Popular, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In accordance with the consolidation guidance for variable interest entities, the Corporation would also consolidate any variable interest entities (“VIEs”) for which it has a controlling financial interest; and therefore, it is the primary beneficiary. Assets held in a fiduciary capacity are not assets of the Corporation and, accordingly, are not included in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Unconsolidated investments, in which there is at least 20% ownership, are generally accounted for by the equity method which the Corporation exercises significant influence, with earnings recorded in other operating income. These investments are included in other assets and the Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss is included in other operating income. Those investments in which there is less than 20% ownership, are generally carried under the cost method of accounting, unless significant influence is exercised. Under the cost method, the Corporation recognizes income when dividends are received. Limited partnerships are accounted for by the equity method unless the investor’s interest is so “minor” that the limited partner may have virtually no influence over partnership operating and financial policies.

Statutory business trusts that are wholly-owned by the Corporation and are issuers of trust preferred securities are not consolidated in the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements.

On May 29, 2012, the Corporation effected a 1-for-10 reverse split of its common stock. All share and per share information in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been adjusted to retroactively reflect the 1-for-10 reverse stock split.

Discontinued Operations

Components of the Corporation that will be disposed of by sale, where the Corporation does not have a significant continuing involvement in the operations after the disposal, are accounted for as discontinued operations. The results of operations of the discontinued operations exclude allocations of corporate overhead. Refer to Note 4 - Discontinued Operations, for additional information on the discontinued operations.

Business combinations

Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition method. Under this method, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date are measured at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The acquisition date is the date the acquirer obtains control. Also, assets or liabilities arising from noncontractual contingencies are measured at their acquisition date at fair value only if it is more likely than not that they meet the definition of an asset or liability. Adjustments subsequently made to the provisional amounts recorded on the acquisition date as a result of new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date but were known to the Corporation after acquisition will be made retroactively during a measurement period not to exceed one year. Furthermore, acquisition-related restructuring costs that do not meet certain criteria of exit or disposal activities are expensed as incurred. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred. Changes in income tax valuation allowances for acquired deferred tax assets are recognized in earnings subsequent to the measurement period as an adjustment to income tax expense. Contingent consideration classified as an asset or a liability is remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved. The changes in fair value of the contingent consideration are recognized in earnings unless the arrangement is a hedging instrument for which changes are initially recognized in other comprehensive income.

There were no significant business combinations during 2014, 2013 or 2012.

Deconsolidation of a subsidiary

The Corporation accounts for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary when it ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Accordingly, it recognizes a gain or loss in results of operations measured as the difference between the sum of the fair value of the consideration received, the fair value of any retained non-controlling investment in the former subsidiary and the carrying amount of any non-controlling interest in the former subsidiary, as compared with the carrying amount of the former subsidiary’s assets and liabilities.

 

184


Use of estimates in the preparation of financial statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2013 and 2012 consolidated financial statements to conform with the 2014 presentation. Such reclassifications did not have an effect on previously reported statement of operations and of cash flows.

Fair value measurements

The Corporation determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value framework established in the guidance for Fair Value Measurements in ASC Subtopic 820-10, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value which are (1) quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets, (2) observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data, and (3) unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. The fair value hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values.

The guidance in ASC Subtopic 820-10 also addresses measuring fair value in situations where markets are inactive and transactions are not orderly. Transactions or quoted prices for assets and liabilities may not be determinative of fair value when transactions are not orderly, and thus, may require adjustments to estimate fair value. Price quotes based on transactions that are not orderly should be given little, if any, weight in measuring fair value. Price quotes based on transactions that are orderly shall be considered in determining fair value, and the weight given is based on facts and circumstances. If sufficient information is not available to determine if price quotes are based on orderly transactions, less weight should be given to the price quote relative to other transactions that are known to be orderly.

Covered assets

Assets subject to loss sharing agreements with the FDIC, including certain loans and other real estate properties, are labeled “covered” on the consolidated statements of financial condition and throughout the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for credit cards, are considered “covered loans” because the Corporation will be reimbursed for 80% of any future losses on these loans subject to the terms of the FDIC loss sharing agreements.

Investment securities

Investment securities are classified in four categories and accounted for as follows:

 

   

Debt securities that the Corporation has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as securities held-to-maturity and reported at amortized cost. The Corporation may not sell or transfer held-to-maturity securities without calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity, unless a nonrecurring or unusual event that could not have been reasonably anticipated has occurred. An investment in debt securities is considered impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost. For other-than-temporary impairments the Corporation assesses if it has both the intent and the ability to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in its fair value to its amortized cost. For other-than-temporary impairment not related to a credit loss (defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis) for a held-to-maturity security is recognized in other comprehensive loss and amortized over the remaining life of the debt security. The amortized cost basis for a debt security is adjusted by the credit loss amount of other-than-temporary impairments.

 

   

Debt and equity securities classified as trading securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in non-interest income.

 

   

Debt and equity securities (equity securities with readily available fair value) not classified as either securities held-to-maturity or trading securities, and which have a readily available fair value, are classified as securities available-for-sale

 

185


 

and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported, net of taxes, in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The specific identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses on securities available-for-sale, which are included in net gains or losses on sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities in the consolidated statements of operations. Declines in the value of debt and equity securities that are considered other-than-temporary reduce the value of the asset, and the estimated loss is recorded in non-interest income. For debt securities, the Corporation assesses whether (a) it has the intent to sell the debt security, or (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery. If either of these conditions is met, an other-than-temporary impairment on the security is recognized. In instances in which a determination is made that a credit loss (defined as the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and the amortized cost basis) exists but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis (i.e., the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss), the impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss, and (b) the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in the statement of operations. The amount of the total impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive loss. The other-than-temporary impairment analyses for both debt and equity securities are performed on a quarterly basis.

 

   

Investments in equity or other securities that do not have readily available fair values are classified as other investment securities in the consolidated statements of financial condition, and are subject to impairment testing, if applicable. These securities are stated at the lower of cost or realizable value. The source of this value varies according to the nature of the investment, and is primarily obtained by the Corporation from valuation analyses prepared by third-parties or from information derived from financial statements available for the corresponding venture capital and mutual funds. Stock that is owned by the Corporation to comply with regulatory requirements, such as Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock, is included in this category, and their realizable value equals their cost.

The amortization of premiums is deducted and the accretion of discounts is added to net interest income based on the interest method over the outstanding period of the related securities. The cost of securities sold is determined by specific identification. Net realized gains or losses on sales of investment securities and unrealized loss valuation adjustments considered other-than-temporary, if any, on securities available-for-sale, held-to-maturity and other investment securities are determined using the specific identification method and are reported separately in the consolidated statements of operations. Purchases and sales of securities are recognized on a trade date basis.

Derivative financial instruments

All derivatives are recognized on the statements of financial condition at fair value. The Corporation’s policy is not to offset the fair value amounts recognized for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement nor to offset the fair value amounts recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral (a receivable) or the obligation to return cash collateral (a payable) arising from the same master netting arrangement as the derivative instruments.

When the Corporation enters into a derivative contract, the derivative instrument is designated as either a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or as a free-standing derivative instrument. For a fair value hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument and changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability or of an unrecognized firm commitment attributable to the hedged risk are recorded in current period earnings. For a cash flow hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument, to the extent that it is effective, are recorded net of taxes in accumulated other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified to net income (loss) in the same period(s) that the hedged transaction impacts earnings. The ineffective portion of cash flow hedges is immediately recognized in current earnings. For free-standing derivative instruments, changes in fair values are reported in current period earnings.

Prior to entering a hedge transaction, the Corporation formally documents the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. This process includes linking all derivative instruments that are designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to specific assets and liabilities on the statements of financial condition or to specific forecasted transactions or firm commitments along with a formal assessment, at both inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, as to the effectiveness of the derivative instrument in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item. Hedge accounting is discontinued when the derivative instrument is not highly effective as a hedge, a derivative expires, is sold, terminated, when it is unlikely that a forecasted transaction will occur or when it is determined that is no longer appropriate. When hedge accounting is discontinued the derivative continues to be carried at fair value with changes in fair value included in earnings.

 

186


For non-exchange traded contracts, fair value is based on dealer quotes, pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques for which the determination of fair may require significant management judgment or estimation.

The fair value of derivative instruments considers the risk of non-performance by the counterparty or the Corporation, as applicable.

The Corporation obtains or pledges collateral in connection with its derivative activities when applicable under the agreement.

Loans

Loans are classified as loans held-in-portfolio when management has the intent and ability to hold the loan for the foreseeable future, or until maturity or payoff. The foreseeable future is a management judgment which is determined based upon the type of loan, business strategies, current market conditions, balance sheet management and liquidity needs. Management’s view of the foreseeable future may change based on changes in these conditions. When a decision is made to sell or securitize a loan that was not originated or initially acquired with the intent to sell or securitize, the loan is reclassified from held-in-portfolio into held-for-sale. Due to changing market conditions or other strategic initiatives, management’s intent with respect to the disposition of the loan may change, and accordingly, loans previously classified as held-for-sale may be reclassified into held-in-portfolio. Loans transferred between loans held-for-sale and held-in-portfolio classifications are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value at the date of transfer.

Purchased loans are accounted at fair value upon acquisition.

Loans held-for-sale are stated at the lower of cost or fair value, cost being determined based on the outstanding loan balance less unearned income, and fair value determined, generally in the aggregate. Fair value is measured based on current market prices for similar loans, outstanding investor commitments, prices of recent sales or discounted cash flow analyses which utilize inputs and assumptions which are believed to be consistent with market participants’ views. The cost basis also includes consideration of deferred origination fees and costs, which are recognized in earnings at the time of sale. Upon reclassification to held-for-sale, credit related fair value adjustments are recorded as a reduction in the allowance for loan losses (“ALLL”). To the extent that the loan’s reduction in value has not already been provided for in the allowance for loan losses, an additional loan loss provision is recorded. Subsequent to reclassification to held-for-sale, the amount, by which cost exceeds fair value, if any, is accounted for as a valuation allowance with changes therein included in the determination of net income (loss) for the period in which the change occurs.

Loans held-in-portfolio are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income, charge-offs, unamortized deferred fees and costs on originated loans, and premiums or discounts on purchased loans. Fees collected and costs incurred in the origination of new loans are deferred and amortized using the interest method or a method which approximates the interest method over the term of the loan as an adjustment to interest yield.

The past due status of a loan is determined in accordance with its contractual repayment terms. Furthermore, loans are reported as past due when either interest or principal remains unpaid for 30 days or more in accordance with its contractual repayment terms.

Non-accrual loans are those loans on which the accrual of interest is discontinued. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, all previously accrued and unpaid interest is charged against income and the loan is accounted for either on a cash-basis method or on the cost-recovery method. Loans designated as non-accruing are returned to accrual status when the Corporation expects repayment of the remaining contractual principal and interest.

Recognition of interest income on commercial and construction loans is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest or when other factors indicate that the collection of principal and interest is doubtful. The impaired portion of secured loan past due as to principal and interest is charged-off not later than 365 days past due. However, in the case of a collateral dependent loan individually evaluated for impairment, the excess of the recorded investment over the fair value of the collateral (portion deemed uncollectible) is generally promptly charged-off, but in any event, not later than the quarter following the quarter in which such excess was first recognized. Commercial unsecured loans are charged-off no later than 180 days past due. Recognition of interest income on mortgage loans is generally discontinued when loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. The impaired portion of a mortgage loan is charged-off when the loan is 180 days past due. The Corporation discontinues the recognition of interest on residential mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) or guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (“VA”) when 18-months delinquent as to principal or interest. The principal repayment on these loans is insured. Recognition of interest income on closed-end consumer loans and home equity lines of credit is discontinued when the loans are 90 days or more in arrears on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end consumer loans, except for home equity lines of credit, until the loans are charged-off. Recognition of interest income for lease financing is ceased when loans are 90 days or more in arrears. Closed-end consumer loans and leases are charged-off when they are 120 days in arrears. Open-end (revolving credit) consumer loans are charged-off when 180 days in arrears. Commercial and consumer overdrafts are generally charged-off no later than 60 days past their due date.

 

187


Purchased impaired loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are not considered non-performing and continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. Also, loans charged-off against the non-accretable difference established in purchase accounting are not reported as charge-offs. Charge-offs on loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are recorded only to the extent that losses exceed the non-accretable difference established with purchase accounting.

A loan classified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) is typically in non-accrual status at the time of the modification. The TDR loan continues in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (at least six months of sustained performance after the modification (or one year for loans providing for quarterly or semi-annual payments)) and management has concluded that it is probable that the borrower would not be in payment default in the foreseeable future.

Lease financing

The Corporation leases passenger and commercial vehicles and equipment to individual and corporate customers. The finance method of accounting is used to recognize revenue on lease contracts that meet the criteria specified in the guidance for leases in ASC Topic 840. Aggregate rentals due over the term of the leases less unearned income are included in finance lease contracts receivable. Unearned income is amortized using a method which results in approximate level rates of return on the principal amounts outstanding. Finance lease origination fees and costs are deferred and amortized over the average life of the lease as an adjustment to the interest yield.

Revenue for other leases is recognized as it becomes due under the terms of the agreement.

Loans acquired in an FDIC-assisted transaction

Loans acquired in a business acquisition are recorded at fair value at the acquisition date. Credit discounts are included in the determination of fair value; therefore, an allowance for loan losses is not recorded at the acquisition date.

The Corporation applied the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-30 to all loans acquired in Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction (including loans that do not meet scope of ASC Subtopic 310-30), except for credit cards and revolving lines of credit that were expressly scoped out from the application of this guidance since they continued to have revolving privileges after acquisition. Management used its judgment in evaluating factors impacting expected cash flows and probable loss assumptions, including the quality of the loan portfolio, portfolio concentrations, distressed economic conditions, quality of underwriting standards of the acquired institution, reductions in collateral real estate values, among other considerations that could also impact the expected cash inflows on the loans.

Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 represent loans showing evidence of credit deterioration and that it is probable, at the date of acquisition, that the Corporation would not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. Generally, acquired loans that meet the definition for nonaccrual status fall within the Corporation’s definition of impaired loans under ASC Subtopic 310-30. Also, based on the fair value determined for the acquired portfolio, acquired loans that did not meet the definition of nonaccrual status also resulted in the recognition of a significant discount attributable to credit quality. Accordingly, an election was made by the Corporation to apply the accretable yield method (expected cash flow model of ASC Subtopic 310-30), as a loan with credit deterioration and impairment, instead of the standard loan discount accretion guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, for the loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction. These loans are disclosed as a loan that was acquired with credit deterioration and impairment.

Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the covered loans acquired from the FDIC were aggregated into pools based on loans that had common risk characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Characteristics considered in pooling loans in the FDIC-assisted transaction included loan type, interest rate type, accruing status, amortization type, rate index and source type. Once the pools are defined, the Corporation maintains the integrity of the pool of multiple loans accounted for as a single asset.

Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the difference between the undiscounted cash flows expected at acquisition and the fair value in the loans, or the “accretable yield,” is recognized as interest income using the effective yield method over the estimated life of the loan if the timing and amount of the future cash flows of the pool is reasonably estimable. The non-accretable difference represents the difference between contractually required principal and interest and the cash flows expected to be collected. Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those expected at the acquisition date are recognized as interest income prospectively. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date are recognized by recording an allowance for loan losses.

 

188


The fair value discount of lines of credit with revolving privileges that are accounted for pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20 represents the difference between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loan. This discount is accreted into interest income over the life of the loan if the loan is in accruing status. Any cash flows collected in excess of the carrying amount of the loan are recognized in earnings at the time of collection. The carrying amount of lines of credit with revolving privileges, which are accounted pursuant to the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, are subject to periodic review to determine the need for recognizing an allowance for loan losses.

Allowance for loan losses

The Corporation follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to provide for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This methodology includes the consideration of factors such as current economic conditions, portfolio risk characteristics, prior loss experience and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based on this methodology. Loan losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses.

The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35. Also, the Corporation determines the allowance for loan losses on purchased impaired loans and purchased loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by analogy, by evaluating decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date.

The accounting guidance provides for the recognition of a loss allowance for groups of homogeneous loans. The determination for general reserves of the allowance for loan losses includes the following principal factors:

 

   

Base net loss rates, which are based on the moving average of annualized net loss rates computed over a 3-year historical loss period for the commercial and construction loan portfolios, and an 18-month period for the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios. The base net loss rates are applied by loan type and by legal entity.

 

   

Recent loss trend adjustment, which replaces the base loss rate with a 12-month average loss rate, when these trends are higher than the respective base loss rates. The objective of this adjustment is to allow for a more recent loss trend to be captured and reflected in the ALLL estimation process. As part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models, as discussed in the following paragraphs and implemented as of June 30, 2014, the Corporation eliminated the use of caps in the recent loss trend adjustment for the consumer and mortgage portfolios, among other enhancements. For the period ended December 31, 2013, the recent loss trend adjustment caps for the consumer and mortgage portfolios were triggered in only one portfolio segment within the Puerto Rico consumer portfolio. Management assessed the impact of the applicable cap through a review of qualitative factors that specifically considered the drivers of recent loss trends and changes to the portfolio composition. The related effect of the aforementioned cap was immaterial for the overall level of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses for the Puerto Rico Consumer portfolio.

For the period ended December 31, 2014, 50% (December 31, 2013 - 27%) of the ALLL for BPPR non-covered loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial, personal and auto loan portfolios for 2014, and in the commercial multi-family, mortgage, and leasing portfolios for 2013.

For the period ended December 31, 2014, 21% (December 31, 2013 - 29%) of the ALLL for BPNA loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial and legacy loan portfolios for 2014 and in the commercial multi-family, commercial real estate non-owner occupied and commercial and industrial portfolios for 2013.

 

   

Environmental factors, which include credit and macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rate, economic activity index and delinquency rates, adopted to account for current market conditions that are likely to cause estimated credit losses to differ from historical losses. The Corporation reflects the effect of these environmental factors on each loan group as an adjustment that, as appropriate, increases the historical loss rate applied to each group. Environmental factors provide updated perspective on credit and economic conditions. Regression analysis is used to select these indicators and quantify the effect on the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses.

 

189


During the second quarter of 2014, management completed the annual review of the components of the ALLL models. As part of this review management updated core metrics and revised certain components related to the estimation process for evaluating the adequacy of the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses. These enhancements to the ALLL methodology, which are described in the paragraphs below, were implemented as of June 30, 2014 and resulted in a net decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $18.7 million for the non-covered portfolio and a net increase to the allowance for loan losses of $0.8 million for the covered portfolio.

Management made the following principal enhancements to the methodology during the second quarter of 2014:

 

   

Annual review and recalibration of the environmental factors adjustment. The environmental factor adjustments are developed by performing regression analyses on selected credit and economic indicators for each applicable loan segment. During the second quarter of 2014, the environmental factor models used to account for changes in current credit and macroeconomic conditions were reviewed and recalibrated based on the latest applicable trends. Management also revised the application of environmental factors to the historical loss rates to consider last 12 month trends of the applicable credit and macroeconomic indicators applied as an incremental adjustment to account for emerging risks not necessarily considered in the historical loss rates.

The combined effect of the aforementioned recalibration and enhancements to the environmental factors adjustment resulted in a decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $17 million at June 30, 2014, of which $14.1 million related to the non-covered BPPR segment and $3.7 million related to the BPNA segment, offset in part by a $0.8 million increase in the BPPR covered segment.

 

   

Increased the historical look-back period for determining the recent loss trend adjustment for consumer and mortgage loans. The Corporation increased the look-back period for assessing recent trends applicable to the determination of consumer and mortgage loan net charge-offs from 6 months to 12 months and eliminated the use of caps. Previously, the Corporation used a recent loss trend adjustment based on 6 months of net charge-offs up to a determined cap. Given the current overall consumer and mortgage credit quality improvements, management concluded that a 12-month look-back period for the recent loss trend adjustment aligns the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology to current credit quality trends while limiting excessive pro-cyclicality given the longer look-back period analysis, thus, eliminating the aforementioned caps.

The combined effect of the aforementioned enhancements to the recent loss trend adjustment resulted in a decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $1 million at June 30, 2014, of which $0.9 million related to the non-covered BPPR segment and $0.1 million related to the BPNA segment.

According to the loan impairment accounting guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35, a loan is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the principal and/or interest are not going to be collected according to the original contractual terms of the loan agreement. Current information and events include “environmental” factors, e.g. existing industry, geographical, economic and political factors. Probable means the future event or events which will confirm the loss or impairment of the loan is likely to occur.

The Corporation defines commercial and construction impaired loans as borrowers with total debt greater than or equal to $1 million with 90 days or more past due, as well as all loans whose terms have been modified in a trouble debt restructuring (“TDRs”). In addition, larger commercial and construction loans ($1 million and over) that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review and thus evaluated for impairment. Commercial and construction loans that originally met the Corporation’s threshold for impairment identification in a prior period, but due to charge-offs or payments are currently below the $1 million threshold and are still 90 days past due, except for TDRs, are accounted for under the Corporation’s general reserve methodology. Although the accounting codification guidance for specific impairment of a loan excludes large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment (e.g. mortgage and consumer loans), it specifically requires that loan modifications considered troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) be analyzed under its provisions. An allowance for loan impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value of an impaired loan exceeds the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective rate, the observable market price of the loan, if available, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. The fair value of the collateral is generally based on appraisals. Appraisals may be adjusted due to their age, and the type, location, and condition of the property or area or general market conditions to reflect the

 

190


expected change in value between the effective date of the appraisal and the impairment measurement date. The Corporation requests updated appraisal reports from pre-approved appraisers for loans that are considered impaired following the Corporation’s reappraisals policy. This policy requires updated appraisals for loans secured by real estate (including construction loans) either annually or every two years depending on the total exposure of the borrower. As a general procedure, the Corporation internally reviews appraisals as part of the underwriting and approval process and also for credits considered impaired.

Troubled debt restructurings

A restructuring constitutes a TDR when the Corporation separately concludes that both of the following conditions exist: 1) the restructuring constitute a concession and 2) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. The concessions stem from an agreement between the creditor and the debtor or are imposed by law or a court. These concessions could include a reduction in the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions intended to maximize collection. A concession has been granted when, as a result of the restructuring, the Corporation does not expect to collect all amounts due, including interest accrued at the original contract rate. If the payment of principal is dependent on the value of collateral, the current value of the collateral is taken into consideration in determining the amount of principal to be collected; therefore, all factors that changed are considered to determine if a concession was granted, including the change in the fair value of the underlying collateral that may be used to repay the loan. Classification of loan modifications as TDRs involves a degree of judgment. Indicators that the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties which are considered include: (i) the borrower is currently in default on any of its debt or it is probable that the borrower would be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification; (ii) the borrower has declared or is in the process of declaring bankruptcy; (iii) there is significant doubt as to whether the borrower will continue to be a going concern; (iv) the borrower has securities that have been delisted, are in the process of being delisted, or are under threat of being delisted from an exchange; (v) based on estimates and projections that only encompass the borrower’s current business capabilities, it is forecasted that the entity-specific cash flows will be insufficient to service the debt (both interest and principal) in accordance with the contractual terms of the existing agreement through maturity; and (vi) absent the current modification, the borrower cannot obtain funds from sources other than the existing creditors at an effective interest rate equal to the current market interest rate for similar debt for a non-troubled debtor. The identification of TDRs is critical in the determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. Loans classified as TDRs may be excluded from TDR status if performance under the restructured terms exists for a reasonable period (at least twelve months of sustained performance) and the loan yields a market rate.

A loan may be restructured in a troubled debt restructuring into two (or more) loan agreements, for example, Note A and Note B. Note A represents the portion of the original loan principal amount that is expected to be fully collected along with contractual interest. Note B represents the portion of the original loan that may be considered uncollectible and charged-off, but the obligation is not forgiven to the borrower. Note A may be returned to accrual status provided all of the conditions for a TDR to be returned to accrual status are met. The modified loans are considered TDRs and thus, are evaluated under the framework of ASC Section 310-10-35 as long as the loans are not part of a pool of loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30.

Refer to Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements for additional qualitative information on TDRs and the Corporation’s determination of the allowance for loan losses.

Reserve for unfunded commitments

The reserve for unfunded commitments is maintained at a level believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities and is included in other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. The determination of the adequacy of the reserve is based upon an evaluation of the unfunded credit facilities. Net adjustments to the reserve for unfunded commitments are included in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

FDIC loss share indemnification asset and true-up payment obligation (contingent consideration)

The FDIC loss share indemnification asset was initially recorded at fair value. Fair value was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements.

The FDIC loss share indemnification asset for loss share agreements is measured separately from the related covered assets as it is not contractually embedded in the assets and is not transferable with the assets should the assets be sold.

The FDIC loss share indemnification asset is recognized on the same basis as the assets subject to loss share protection. As such, for covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, decreases in expected reimbursements from the FDIC due to improvements in expected cash flows to be received from borrowers, are recognized in non-interest income prospectively over the life of the FDIC loss sharing agreements. For covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20, as the loan discount

 

191


recorded as of the acquisition date was accreted into income, a reduction of the related indemnification asset was recorded as a reduction in non-interest income. Increases in expected reimbursements from the FDIC are recognized in non-interest income in the same period that the allowance for credit losses for the related loans is recognized.

The amortization or accretion due to discounting of the loss share asset and changes in expected loss sharing reimbursements is included in non-interest income, particularly in the category of FDIC loss share income (expense).

The true-up payment obligation associated with the loss share agreements is accounted for at fair value in accordance with ASC Section 805-30-25-6 as it is considered contingent consideration. The true-up payment obligation is included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Any changes in the carrying value of the obligation are included in the category of FDIC loss share income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations.

Refer to Note 13 for additional information on the FDIC loss share indemnification asset and true-up payment obligation.

Transfers and servicing of financial assets

The transfer of an entire financial asset, a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset in which the Corporation surrenders control over the assets is accounted for as a sale if all of the following conditions set forth in ASC Topic 860 are met: (1) the assets must be isolated from creditors of the transferor, (2) the transferee must obtain the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the transferor cannot maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity. When the Corporation transfers financial assets and the transfer fails any one of these criteria, the Corporation is prevented from derecognizing the transferred financial assets and the transaction is accounted for as a secured borrowing. For federal and Puerto Rico income tax purposes, the Corporation treats the transfers of loans which do not qualify as “true sales” under the applicable accounting guidance, as sales, recognizing a deferred tax asset or liability on the transaction.

For transfers of financial assets that satisfy the conditions to be accounted for as sales, the Corporation derecognizes all assets sold; recognizes all assets obtained and liabilities incurred in consideration as proceeds of the sale, including servicing assets and servicing liabilities, if applicable; initially measures at fair value assets obtained and liabilities incurred in a sale; and recognizes in earnings any gain or loss on the sale.

The guidance on transfer of financial assets requires a true sale analysis of the treatment of the transfer under state law as if the Corporation was a debtor under the bankruptcy code. A true sale legal analysis includes several legally relevant factors, such as the nature and level of recourse to the transferor, and the nature of retained interests in the loans sold. The analytical conclusion as to a true sale is never absolute and unconditional, but contains qualifications based on the inherent equitable powers of a bankruptcy court, as well as the unsettled state of the common law. Once the legal isolation test has been met, other factors concerning the nature and extent of the transferor’s control over the transferred assets are taken into account in order to determine whether derecognition of assets is warranted.

The Corporation sells mortgage loans to the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) in the normal course of business and retains the servicing rights. The GNMA programs under which the loans are sold allow the Corporation to repurchase individual delinquent loans that meet certain criteria. At the Corporation’s option, and without GNMA’s prior authorization, the Corporation may repurchase the delinquent loan for an amount equal to 100% of the remaining principal balance of the loan. Once the Corporation has the unconditional ability to repurchase the delinquent loan, the Corporation is deemed to have regained effective control over the loan and recognizes the loan on its balance sheet as well as an offsetting liability, regardless of the Corporation’s intent to repurchase the loan.

Servicing assets

The Corporation periodically sells or securitizes loans while retaining the obligation to perform the servicing of such loans. In addition, the Corporation may purchase or assume the right to service loans originated by others. Whenever the Corporation undertakes an obligation to service a loan, management assesses whether a servicing asset or liability should be recognized. A servicing asset is recognized whenever the compensation for servicing is expected to more than adequately compensate the servicer for performing the servicing. Likewise, a servicing liability would be recognized in the event that servicing fees to be received are not expected to adequately compensate the Corporation for its expected cost. Mortgage servicing assets recorded at fair value are separately presented on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

All separately recognized servicing assets are initially recognized at fair value. For subsequent measurement of servicing rights, the Corporation has elected the fair value method for mortgage loans servicing rights (“MSRs”) while all other servicing assets, particularly those related to Small Business Administration (“SBA”) commercial loans, follow the amortization method. Under the fair

 

192


value measurement method, MSRs are recorded at fair value each reporting period, and changes in fair value are reported in mortgage banking activities in the consolidated statement of operations. Under the amortization method, servicing assets are amortized in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated servicing income, and assessed for impairment based on fair value at each reporting period. Contractual servicing fees including ancillary income and late fees, as well as fair value adjustments, and impairment losses, if any, are reported in mortgage banking activities in the consolidated statement of operations. Loan servicing fees, which are based on a percentage of the principal balances of the loans serviced, are credited to income as loan payments are collected.

The fair value of servicing rights is estimated by using a cash flow valuation model which calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing cash flows, taking into consideration actual and expected loan prepayment rates, discount rates, servicing costs, and other economic factors, which are determined based on current market conditions.

For purposes of evaluating and measuring impairment of capitalized servicing assets that are accounted under the amortization method, the amount of impairment recognized, if any, is the amount by which the capitalized servicing assets per stratum exceed their estimated fair value. Temporary impairment is recognized through a valuation allowance with changes included in results of operations for the period in which the change occurs. If it is later determined that all or a portion of the temporary impairment no longer exists for a particular stratum, the valuation allowance is reduced through a recovery in earnings. Any fair value in excess of the cost basis of the servicing asset for a given stratum is not recognized. Servicing rights subsequently accounted under the amortization method are also reviewed for other-than-temporary impairment. When the recoverability of an impaired servicing asset accounted under the amortization method is determined to be remote, the unrecoverable portion of the valuation allowance is applied as a direct write-down to the carrying value of the servicing rights, precluding subsequent recoveries.

Premises and equipment

Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of each type of asset. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed over the terms of the respective leases or the estimated useful lives of the improvements, whichever is shorter. Costs of maintenance and repairs which do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Costs of renewals and betterments are capitalized. When assets are disposed of, their cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in earnings as realized or incurred, respectively.

The Corporation capitalizes interest cost incurred in the construction of significant real estate projects, which consist primarily of facilities for its own use or intended for lease. The amount of interest cost capitalized is to be an allocation of the interest cost incurred during the period required to substantially complete the asset. The interest rate for capitalization purposes is to be based on a weighted average rate on the Corporation’s outstanding borrowings, unless there is a specific new borrowing associated with the asset. Interest cost capitalized for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was not significant.

The Corporation has operating lease arrangements primarily associated with the rental of premises to support its branch network or for general office space. Certain of these arrangements are non-cancellable and provide for rent escalations and renewal options. Rent expense on non-cancellable operating leases with scheduled rent increases are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Impairment of long-lived assets

The Corporation evaluates for impairment its long-lived assets to be held and used, and long-lived assets to be disposed of, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Restructuring costs

A liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity is recognized and measured initially at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred. If future service is required for employees to receive the one-time termination benefit, the liability is initially measured at its fair value as of the termination date and recognized over the future service period.

Other real estate

Other real estate, received in satisfaction of a loan, is recorded at fair value less estimated costs of disposal. The amount by which the carrying amount of the loan exceeds the fair value less cost to sell is recorded as a charge against the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent to foreclosure, any losses in the carrying value arising from periodic re-evaluations of the properties, and any gains or losses on the sale of these properties are credited or charged to expense in the period incurred and are included as a component of other operating expenses. The cost of maintaining and operating such properties is expensed as incurred.

 

193


Updated appraisals or third-party broker price opinions of value (“BPO”) are obtained to adjust the value of the other real estate assets. The frequency depends on the loan type and total credit exposure. The appraisal for a commercial or construction other real estate property with a book value greater than $1 million is updated annually and if lower than $1 million it is updated every two years. For residential mortgage properties, the Corporation requests third-party BPOs or appraisals, generally on an annual basis.

Appraisals may be adjusted due to age, collateral inspections, property profiles, or general market conditions. The adjustments applied are based upon internal information such as other appraisals for the type of properties and/or loss severity information that can provide historical trends in the real estate market, and may change from time to time based on market conditions.

Goodwill and other intangible assets

Goodwill is recognized when the purchase price is higher than the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations under the purchase method of accounting. Goodwill is not amortized, but is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate possible impairment using a two-step process at each reporting unit level. The first step of the goodwill impairment test, used to identify potential impairment, compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, the goodwill of the reporting unit is not considered impaired and the second step of the impairment test is unnecessary. If needed, the second step consists of comparing the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the Corporation generally uses a combination of methods, which include market price multiples of comparable companies and the discounted cash flow analysis. Goodwill impairment losses are recorded as part of operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.

Other intangible assets deemed to have an indefinite life are not amortized, but are tested for impairment using a one-step process which compares the fair value with the carrying amount of the asset. In determining that an intangible asset has an indefinite life, the Corporation considers expected cash inflows and legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic and other factors, which could limit the intangible asset’s useful life.

Other identifiable intangible assets with a finite useful life, mainly core deposits, are amortized using various methods over the periods benefited, which range from 4 to 10 years. These intangibles are evaluated periodically for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Impairments on intangible assets with a finite useful life are evaluated under the guidance for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets.

Assets sold / purchased under agreements to repurchase / resell

Repurchase and resell agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are carried at the amounts at which the assets will be subsequently reacquired or resold as specified in the respective agreements.

It is the Corporation’s policy to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. However, the counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control over such securities, and accordingly those securities are not reflected in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition. The Corporation monitors the fair value of the underlying securities as compared to the related receivable, including accrued interest.

It is the Corporation’s policy to maintain effective control over assets sold under agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Corporation may require counterparties to deposit additional collateral or return collateral pledged, when appropriate.

Software

Capitalized software is stated at cost, less accumulated amortization. Capitalized software includes purchased software and capitalizable application development costs associated with internally-developed software. Amortization, computed on a straight-line method, is charged to operations over the estimated useful life of the software. Capitalized software is included in “Other assets” in the consolidated statement of financial condition.

Guarantees, including indirect guarantees of indebtedness of others

The Corporation, as a guarantor, recognizes at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Refer to Note 30 to the consolidated financial statements for further disclosures on guarantees.

Treasury stock

Treasury stock is recorded at cost and is carried as a reduction of stockholders’ equity in the consolidated statements of financial condition. At the date of retirement or subsequent reissue, the treasury stock account is reduced by the cost of such stock. At retirement, the excess of the cost of the treasury stock over its par value is recorded entirely to surplus. At reissuance, the difference between the consideration received upon issuance and the specific cost is charged or credited to surplus.

 

194


Income Recognition – Insurance agency business

Commissions and fees are recognized when related policies are effective. Additional premiums and rate adjustments are recorded as they occur. Contingent commissions are recorded on the accrual basis when the amount to be received is notified by the insurance company. Commission income from advance business is deferred. An allowance is created for expected adjustments to commissions earned relating to policy cancellations.

Income Recognition – Investment banking revenues and commissions

Investment banking revenue is recorded as follows: underwriting fees at the time the underwriting is completed and income is reasonably determinable; corporate finance advisory fees as earned, according to the terms of the specific contracts; and sales commissions on a trade-date basis. Commission income and expenses related to customers’ securities transactions are recorded on a trade-date basis.

Foreign exchange

Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to U.S. dollars using prevailing rates of exchange at the end of the period. Revenues, expenses, gains and losses are translated using weighted average rates for the period. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustment from operations for which the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar is reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss, except for highly inflationary environments in which the effects are included in other operating expenses.

The Corporation holds interests in Centro Financiero BHD León, S.A. (“BHD León”) in the Dominican Republic. The business of BHD León is mainly conducted in their country’s foreign currency. The resulting foreign currency translation adjustment from these operations is reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss. During 2014, BHD León entered into a merger agreement with Grupo Financiero León, as part of this transaction BHD León issued additional stock which had a dilutive effect of Popular’s equity participation. Refer to note 18, Other Assets, for additional information. Therefore, a pro rata portion of the accumulated translation adjustment component of the equity attributable to this equity method investment was recognized as a loss through earnings.

During 2013, the Corporation sold its investment in Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred, C.A. (formerly EVERTEC DE VENEZUELA, C.A.) which was written-down during 2011 as the Corporation determined to wind-down those operations.

Refer to the disclosure of accumulated other comprehensive loss included in the Note 29 for the outstanding balances of the foreign currency translation adjustments at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Income taxes

The Corporation recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Corporation’s financial statements or tax returns. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined for differences between financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. The computation is based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

The guidance for income taxes requires a reduction of the carrying amounts of deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not (defined as a likelihood of more than 50 percent) that such assets will not be realized. Accordingly, the need to establish valuation allowances for deferred tax assets is assessed periodically by the Corporation based on the more likely than not realization threshold criterion. In the assessment for a valuation allowance, appropriate consideration is given to all positive and negative evidence related to the realization of the deferred tax assets. This assessment considers, among other matters, all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing temporary differences, the future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in carryback years and tax-planning strategies. In making such assessments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified.

The valuation of deferred tax assets requires judgment in assessing the likely future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Corporation’s financial statements or tax returns and future profitability. The Corporation’s accounting for deferred tax consequences represents management’s best estimate of those future events.

Positions taken in the Corporation’s tax returns may be subject to challenge by the taxing authorities upon examination. Uncertain tax positions are initially recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not the position will be sustained upon examination by the tax authorities. Such tax positions are both initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax

 

195


benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement with the tax authority, assuming full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts. Interest on income tax uncertainties is classified within income tax expense in the statement of operations; while the penalties, if any, are accounted for as other operating expenses.

The Corporation accounts for the taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities on a net basis (excluded from revenues).

Income tax expense or benefit for the year is allocated among continuing operations, discontinued operations, and other comprehensive income, as applicable. The amount allocated to continuing operations is the tax effect of the pretax income or loss from continuing operations that occurred during the year, plus or minus income tax effects of (a) changes in circumstances that cause a change in judgment about the realization of deferred tax assets in future years, (b) changes in tax laws or rates, (c) changes in tax status, and (d) tax-deductible dividends paid to shareholders, subject to certain exceptions.

Employees’ retirement and other postretirement benefit plans

Pension costs are computed on the basis of accepted actuarial methods and are charged to current operations. Net pension costs are based on various actuarial assumptions regarding future experience under the plan, which include costs for services rendered during the period, interest costs and return on plan assets, as well as deferral and amortization of certain items such as actuarial gains or losses. The funding policy is to contribute to the plan as necessary to provide for services to date and for those expected to be earned in the future. To the extent that these requirements are fully covered by assets in the plan, a contribution may not be made in a particular year.

The cost of postretirement benefits, which is determined based on actuarial assumptions and estimates of the costs of providing these benefits in the future, is accrued during the years that the employee renders the required service.

The guidance for compensation retirement benefits of ASC Topic 715 requires the recognition of the funded status of each defined pension benefit plan, retiree health care and other postretirement benefit plans on the statement of financial condition.

Stock-based compensation

The Corporation opted to use the fair value method of recording stock-based compensation as described in the guidance for employee share plans in ASC Subtopic 718-50.

Comprehensive income (loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances, except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. The presentation of comprehensive income (loss) is included in separate consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

Net income (loss) per common share

Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) adjusted for preferred stock dividends, including undeclared or unpaid dividends if cumulative, and charges or credits related to the extinguishment of preferred stock or induced conversions of preferred stock, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted income per common share take into consideration the weighted average common shares adjusted for the effect of stock options, restricted stock and warrants on common stock, using the treasury stock method.

Statement of cash flows

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash includes cash on hand and amounts due from banks.

 

196


Note 3 – New accounting pronouncements

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2015-01, Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items (“ASU 2015-01”)

The FASB issued ASU 2015-01 in January 2015, which eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Presently, an event or transaction is presumed to be an ordinary and usual activity of the reporting entity unless evidence clearly supports the classification as an extraordinary item. If an event or transaction meets the criteria for extraordinary classification, an entity is required to segregate the extraordinary item from the results of ordinary operations and show the item separately in the income statement, net of tax, after income from continuing operations. The entity is also required to disclose applicable income taxes and either present or disclose earnings-per-share data applicable to the extraordinary item.

Eliminating the concept of extraordinary items will save time and reduce costs for preparers because they will not have to assess whether a particular event or transaction event is extraordinary. This will alleviate uncertainty for preparers, auditors, and regulators because auditors and regulators no longer will need to evaluate whether a preparer treated an unusual and/or infrequent item appropriately.

The presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature and occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring.

The amendments of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 31, 2015. The amendments may be applied prospectively or retrospectively to all prior periods presented in the financial statements. Early adoption is permitted provided is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations or presentation and disclosures.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-17, Business Combination (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (“ASU 2014-17”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-17 in November 2014, which provides an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting to its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. An acquired entity may elect the option to apply pushdown accounting in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs. An acquired entity should determine whether to elect to apply pushdown accounting for each individual change-in-control event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. If pushdown accounting is not applied in the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurs, an acquired entity will have the option to elect to apply pushdown accounting in a subsequent reporting period to the acquired entity’s most recent change-in-control event.

An election to apply pushdown accounting in a reporting period after the reporting period in which the change-in-control event occurred should be considered a change in accounting principle. If pushdown accounting is applied to an individual change-in-control event, the election is irrevocable.

If an acquired entity elects the option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements, it should disclose information in the current reporting period that enables users of financial statements to evaluate the effect of pushdown accounting.

The amendments in this ASU are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event.

The provisions of this ASU did not had a material effect on the consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-16, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share is more Akin to Debt or to Equity (“ASU 2014-16”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-16 in November 2014, which intends to eliminate the use of different methods in practice and thereby reduce existing diversity under GAAP in the accounting for hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share. An entity should determine the nature of the host contract by considering the economic characteristics and risks of the entire hybrid financial instrument, including the embedded derivative feature that is being evaluated for separate accounting from the host contract. In evaluating the stated and implied substantive terms and features, the existence or omission of any single term or feature does not necessarily determine the economic characteristics and risks of the host contract. Although an individual term or feature may weigh more heavily in the evaluation on the basis of facts and circumstances, an entity should use judgment based on an evaluation of all relevant terms and features.

 

197


The amendment in this ASU does not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. An entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria.

The amendments in the ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning in the first quarter of 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The effects of initially adopting the amendments of this ASU should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-15 in August 2014, which provides guidance in GAAP about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide the related footnote disclosures. These amendments should reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures.

In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable).

When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition, results of operations or presentation and disclosures.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-14, Receivables – Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40): Classification of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (“ASU 2014-14”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-14 in August 2014, which intends to resolve the diversity in practice related to how creditors classify government-guaranteed mortgage loans, including FHA or VA guaranteed loans, upon foreclosure. Some creditors reclassify those loans to real estate consistent with other foreclosed loans that do not have guarantees; others reclassify the loans to receivables. This ASU address the classification of certain foreclosed mortgage loans held by creditors that are either fully or partially guaranteed under government programs.

The amendments of the ASU require that a mortgage loan be derecognized and that a separate other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if the following conditions are met:

 

  1-

The loan has a government guarantee that is not separable from the loan before foreclosure.

 

  2-

At the time of foreclosure, the creditor has the intent to convey the real estate property to the guarantor and make a claim on the guarantee, and the creditor has the ability to recover under that claim.

 

  3-

At the time of foreclosure, any amount of the claim that is determined on the basis of the fair value of the real estate is fixed.

Upon foreclosure, the separate other receivable should be measured based on the amount of the loan balance expected to be recovered from the guarantor.

The amendments in the ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning in the first quarter of 2015. The amendments of this ASU can be applied using either a prospective transition method or a modified retrospective transition method. For prospective transition, an entity should apply the amendments in this Update to foreclosures that occur after the date of adoption. For modified retrospective transition, an entity should apply the amendments in this Update by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the beginning of the annual period of adoption. Prior periods should not be adjusted. However, a reporting entity must apply the same method of transition as elected under ASU 2014-04.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-13, Consolidation (Topic 810): Measuring the Financial Assets and the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financial Entity (“ASU 2014-13”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-13 in August 2014, which intends to clarify that when a reporting entity that consolidates a collateralized financing entity may elect to measure the financial assets and the financial liabilities of that collateralized financing entity using either the measurement alternative included in this Update or Topic 820 on fair value measurement. When the measurement alternative is not elected, the amendments of this Update clarify that the fair value of the financial assets and the fair value of the financial liabilities of the consolidated collateralized financing entity should be measured using the requirements of Topic 820 and any differences in the fair value of the financial assets and the fair value of the financial liabilities of that entity should be reflected in earnings and attributed to the reporting entity in the consolidated statement of income.

When a reporting entity elects the measurement alternative included in this Update for a collateralized financing entity, the reporting entity should measure both the financial assets and the financial liabilities of that entity in its consolidated financial statements using the more observable of the fair value of the financial assets and the fair value of the financial liabilities.

 

198


The amendments in the ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2016. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period. The amendments of this ASU can be applied using a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to equity as of the beginning of the annual period of adoption. A reporting entity also may apply the amendments retrospectively to all relevant prior periods beginning with the annual period in which the amendments of ASU 2009-17 were initially adopted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (“ASU 2014-12”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-12 in June 2014, which intends to resolve the diverse accounting treatment of awards with a performance target that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period. That is, the employee would be eligible to vest in the award regardless of whether the employee is rendering service on the date the performance target is achieved.

The amendments of the ASU require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award.

Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the periods for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period.

The amendments in the ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments of this ASU can be applied (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets outstanding at the beginning of the period of adoption and to all new or modified awards thereafter.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures (“ASU 2014-11”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-11 in June 2014, which requires two accounting changes. First, the amendments in this Update change the accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions to secured borrowing accounting. Second, for repurchase financing arrangements, the amendments require separate accounting for a transfer of a financial asset executed contemporaneously with a repurchase agreement with the same counterparty, which will result in secured borrowing accounting for the repurchase agreement.

The amendments in this Update require disclosures for certain transactions comprising (1) a transfer of a financial asset accounted for as a sale and (2) an agreement with the same transferee entered into in contemplation of the initial transfer that results in the transferor retaining substantially all of the exposure to the economic return on the transferred financial asset throughout the term of the transaction.

The accounting changes in this ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2015. Early adoption is prohibited. An entity is required to present changes in accounting for transactions outstanding on the effective date as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606); (“ASU 2014-09”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-09 in May 2014, which clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develop a common revenue standard that would (1) remove inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements, (2) provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues, (3) improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets, (4) provide more useful information to users of financial statement through improved disclosure requirements and (5) simplify the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. ASU 2014-09 amends the ASC Codification and creates a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.

 

199


The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

In addition, the new guidance requires disclosures to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about contract with customers, significant judgments and changes in judgments, and assets recognized from the cost to obtain or fulfill a contract.

The amendments in this ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2017. Early adoption is not permitted.

The Corporation is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on the presentation and disclosures in its consolidated financial statements.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposal of Components of an Entity (“ASU 2014-08”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-08 in April 2014, which changes the criteria for reporting discontinued operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. Under the new guidance, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations should be presented as discontinued operations. Those strategic shifts should have a major effect on the organization’s operations and financial results. Examples include a disposal of a major geographic area, a major line of business, or a major equity investment.

In addition, the new guidance requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will include more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations.

The new guidance also requires disclosure of the pre-tax income attributable to a disposal of a significant part of an organization that does not qualify for discontinued operations reporting. This disclosure will provide information about the ongoing trends in the reporting organization’s results from continuing operations.

The amendments in the ASU are effective in the first quarter of 2015. Early adoption is permitted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statement of financial condition or result of operations, though will require additional disclosures in the event that the Corporation reclassifies assets and liabilities to discontinued operations after the effective date of this pronouncement.

FASB Accounting Standards Update 2014-04, Receivables-Troubled Debt Restructuring by Creditors (SubTopic 310-40): Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (“ASU 2014-04”)

The FASB issued ASU 2014-04 in January 2014 which clarifies when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of a residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized.

The amendments of this ASU clarify that an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan, upon either: a) the creditor obtaining legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure; or b) the borrower conveying all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy that loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement.

The amendment of this guidance requires interim and annual disclosures of both the amount of foreclosed residential real estate property held by the creditor and the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure according to local requirements of the applicable jurisdiction.

ASU 2014-04 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2014. The amendments in this ASU can be elected using either a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method. Early adoption is permitted.

The Corporation does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material effect on its consolidated statements of financial condition or results of operations.

 

200


Note 4 – Discontinued operations

On April 22, 2014, BPNA, the Corporation’s U.S. mainland banking subsidiary, entered into definitive agreements to sell its California, Illinois and Central Florida regional operations to three different buyers.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation recorded non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $186.5 million, related to the goodwill allocated, on a relative fair value basis, to these operations. However, this non-cash charge had no impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios. Refer to Note 20, for additional information on the goodwill impairment charge.

On August 8, 2014, BPNA completed the sale of its Illinois regional operations. As part of the transaction, BPNA sold its 12 branches in the Chicago metropolitan area, including $562 million in loans, and $726 million in deposits, each as of July 31, 2014. The transaction resulted in a net gain of $24.6 million.

On September 15, 2014, BPNA completed the sale of its Central Florida regional operations. As part of the transaction, BPNA sold its 9 branches in the Central Florida area, including $104 million in loans and $217 million in deposits, each as of August 31, 2014. The transaction resulted in a net gain of $1.2 million.

On November 8, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of the California regional operations. The Corporation sold 20 branches and transferred $1.1 billion in loans and $1.1 billion in deposits to Banc of California National Association, a wholly owned subsidiary of Banc of California, Inc. The transaction resulted in a net gain of $8.1 million, net of transaction costs. The Corporation agreed to provide, subject to certain limitations, customary indemnification to the purchaser, including with respect to certain pre-closing liabilities and violations of representations and warranties. The Corporation also agreed to indemnify the purchaser for up to 1.5% of credit losses on transferred loans for a period of two years after the closing. Pursuant to this indemnification provision, the Corporation’s maximum exposure is approximately $16 million. The Corporation recognized a reserve of approximately $2.2 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification.

In connection with these transactions, the Corporation is relocating certain back office operations to Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation incurred restructuring charges of $26.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2014. Additional restructuring charges amounting to approximately $22.0 million are expected to be incurred in the year 2015, comprised of $13.0 million in personnel related costs and $9.0 million in lease cancelations and other restructuring costs. Refer to Note 5, for restructuring charges incurred during the year ended December 31, 2014.

The regional operations sold constituted a business, as defined in ASC 805-10-55. Accordingly, the decision to sell these businesses resulted in the discontinuance of each of these respective operations and classification as held-for-sale. For financial reporting purposes, the results of the discontinued operations are presented as “Assets / Liabilities from discontinued operations” in the consolidated statement of condition and “(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax” in the consolidated statement of operations. As required by ASC 205-20, current and prior periods presented in the consolidated statement of operations as well as the related note disclosures covering income and expense amounts have been retrospectively adjusted for the impact of the discontinued operations for comparative purposes. The consolidated statement of financial condition and related note disclosure for prior periods do not reflect the reclassification of these assets and liabilities to discontinued operations.

After the sale of these three regions, at December 31, 2014, there were no assets held within the discontinued operations. Liabilities within discontinued operations were $5.1 million, which includes the indemnity reserve of $2.2 million related to the California regional sale, as mentioned above, in addition to accruals for legal and professional fees.

 

201


The following table provides the components of net income (loss) from the discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Net interest income

   $ 61,352      $ 88,006  

Provision (reversal) for loan losses

     (6,764      (3,543

Net gain on sale of regions

     33,829        —    

Other non-interest income

     27,823        19,556  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

  61,652     19,556  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

  36,675     33,170  

Net occupancy expenses

  3,086     12,680  

Professional fees

  15,642     11,153  

Goodwill impairment charge

  186,511     —    

Other operating expenses

  10,834     13,593  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  252,748     70,596  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

$ (122,980 $ 40,509  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 5 – Restructuring plan

As discussed in Note 4, in connection with the sale of the operations of the California, Illinois and Central Florida regions, the Corporation is relocating certain back office operations, previously conducted in these regions, to Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation has undertaken a restructuring plan (the “PCB Restructuring Plan”) to eliminate and re-locate employment positions, terminate contracts and incur other costs associated with moving the operations to Puerto Rico and New York. The Corporation estimates that it will incur restructuring charges of approximately $49 million, of which approximately $27 million were incurred during 2014 and $22 million are expected to be incurred in 2015, comprised of $13.0 million in personnel related costs and $9.0 million in lease cancellations and other restructuring costs.

Full-time equivalent employees at the California, Illinois and Central Florida regions were 37 as of December 31, 2014, compared with 365 as of December 31, 2013. Some of the employees at these regions were transferred to the acquiring entities. The remaining employees at these regions are expected to be transferred to other areas of the Corporation’s U.S. mainland or Puerto Rico operations or depart by mid-2015.

The following table details the expenses recorded by the Corporation that were associated with the PCB Restructuring Plan:

 

(In thousands)

   Year ended
December 31, 2014
 

Personnel costs

   $ 17,516  

Net occupancy expenses

     3,905  

Equipment expenses

     457  

Professional fees

     3,133  

Other operating expenses

     1,714  
  

 

 

 

Total restructuring costs

$ 26,725  
  

 

 

 

 

202


The following table presents the activity in the reserve for the restructuring costs associated with the PCB Restructuring Plan:

 

(In thousands)

      

Balance at January 1, 2014

   $ —    

Charges expensed during the period

     14,785  

Payments made during the period

     (1,249
  

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014

$ 13,536  
  

 

 

 

Note 6 – Restrictions on cash and due from banks and certain securities

The Corporation’s banking subsidiaries, BPPR and BPNA, are required by federal and state regulatory agencies to maintain average reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “Fed”) or other banks. Those required average reserve balances amounted to $1.0 billion at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $992 million). Cash and due from banks, as well as other short-term, highly liquid securities, are used to cover the required average reserve balances.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation held $45 million in restricted assets in the form of funds deposited in money market accounts, trading account securities and investment securities available for sale (December 31, 2013 - $44 million). The amounts held in trading account securities and investment securities available for sale consist primarily of restricted assets held for the Corporation’s non-qualified retirement plans and fund deposits guaranteeing possible liens or encumbrances over the title of insured properties.

Note 7 – Securities purchased under agreements to resell

The securities purchased underlying the agreements to resell were delivered to, and are held by, the Corporation. The counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control over such securities. The Corporation is permitted by contract to repledge the securities, and has agreed to resell to the counterparties the same or substantially similar securities at the maturity of the agreements.

The fair value of the collateral securities held by the Corporation on these transactions at December 31, was as follows:

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Repledged

   $ 145,866      $ 189,308  

Not repledged

     33,258        20,734  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 179,124   $ 210,042  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The repledged securities were used as underlying securities for repurchase agreement transactions.

 

203


Note 8 – Pledged assets

Certain securities and loans were pledged to secure public and trust deposits, assets sold under agreements to repurchase, other borrowings and credit facilities available, derivative positions, and loan servicing agreements. The classification and carrying amount of the Corporation’s pledged assets, in which the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge the collateral, were as follows:

 

(In thousands)

   December 31,
2014
     December 31,
2013
 

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

   $ 1,700,820      $ 1,638,558  

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost

     60,515        35,000  

Loans held-for-sale measured at lower of cost or fair value

     —          363  

Loans held-in-portfolio covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

     480,441        407,257  

Loans held-in-portfolio not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

     8,820,204        9,108,984  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total pledged assets

$ 11,061,980   $ 11,190,162  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Pledged securities that the creditor has the right by custom or contract to repledge are presented separately on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation had $ 0.7 billion in investment securities available-for-sale and $ 0.7 billion in loans that served as collateral to secure public funds (December 31, 2013 - $ 1.0 billion and $ 0.5 billion, respectively).

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries had short-term and long-term credit facilities authorized with the Federal Home Loan Bank system (the “FHLB”) aggregating to $3.7 billion (December 31, 2013 - $3.0 billion). Refer to Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities. At December 31, 2014, the credit facilities authorized with the FHLB were collateralized by $ 4.5 billion in loans held-in-portfolio (December 31, 2013 - $ 4.5 billion). Also, at December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries had a borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve (“Fed”) discount window of $2.1 billion, which remained unused as of such date (December 31, 2013 - $3.4 billion). The amount available under these credit facilities with the Fed is dependent upon the balance of loans and securities pledged as collateral. At December 31, 2014, the credit facilities with the Fed discount window were collateralized by $ 4.1 billion in loans held-in-portfolio (December 31, 2013 - $ 4.5 billion). These pledged assets are included in the above table and were not reclassified and separately reported in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

In addition, at December 31, 2014, there were no trade receivables from brokers and counterparties pledged to secure repurchase agreements ($69 million as of December 31, 2013).

 

204


Note 9 – Investment securities available-for-sale

The following table presents the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     At December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Amortized
cost
     Gross
unrealized
gains
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Weighted
average
yield
 

U.S. Treasury securities

              

After 1 to 5 years

   $ 698,003      $ 2,226      $ 75      $ 700,154        1.14
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total U.S. Treasury securities

  698,003     2,226     75     700,154     1.14  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

Within 1 year

  42,140     380     —       42,520     1.61  

After 1 to 5 years

  1,603,245     1,168     9,936     1,594,477     1.26  

After 5 to 10 years

  67,373     58     2,271     65,160     1.72  

After 10 years

  23,000     —       184     22,816     3.18  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

  1,735,758     1,606     12,391     1,724,973     1.31  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

Within 1 year

  2,765     17     —       2,782     3.83  

After 1 to 5 years

  1,024     38     —       1,062     8.40  

After 5 to 10 years

  22,552     2     2,331     20,223     5.82  

After 10 years

  48,823     40     11,218     37,645     6.22  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

  75,164     97     13,549     61,712     6.04  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

After 1 to 5 years

  3,687     87     —       3,774     2.66  

After 5 to 10 years

  25,202     985     —       26,187     2.93  

After 10 years

  1,905,763     13,109     38,803     1,880,069     2.03  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

  1,934,652     14,181     38,803     1,910,030     2.04  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

After 1 to 5 years

  27,339     1,597     —       28,936     4.68  

After 5 to 10 years

  147,182     7,314     1     154,495     3.51  

After 10 years

  676,567     45,047     683     720,931     3.93  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total mortgage-backed securities

  851,088     53,958     684     904,362     3.88  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Equity securities (without contractual maturity)

  1,351     1,271     —       2,622     5.03  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other

After 1 to 5 years

  9,277     10     —       9,287     1.69  

After 5 to 10 years

  1,957     62     —       2,019     3.63  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other

  11,234     72     —       11,306     2.03  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 5,307,250   $ 73,411   $ 65,502   $ 5,315,159     2.04
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     At December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Amortized
cost
     Gross
unrealized
gains
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Weighted
average
yield
 

U.S. Treasury securities

              

After 1 to 5 years

   $ 26,474      $ 2,008      $ —        $ 28,482        3.85
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total U.S. Treasury securities

  26,474     2,008     —       28,482     3.85  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

Within 1 year

  25,021     39     —       25,060     1.85  

After 1 to 5 years

  1,087,453     1,678     12,715     1,076,416     1.26  

After 5 to 10 years

  528,611     100     21,742     506,969     1.52  

After 10 years

  23,000     —       2,240     20,760     3.12  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

  1,664,085     1,817     36,697     1,629,205     1.38  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

After 1 to 5 years

  6,228     45     85     6,188     4.64  

After 5 to 10 years

  23,147     —       1,978     21,169     6.33  

After 10 years

  48,803     29     9,812     39,020     5.84  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

  78,178     74     11,875     66,377     5.89  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

After 1 to 5 years

  5,131     101     —       5,232     1.79  

After 5 to 10 years

  31,613     921     —       32,534     2.98  

After 10 years

  2,438,021     18,532     76,023     2,380,530     2.05  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

  2,474,765     19,554     76,023     2,418,296     2.06  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label

After 10 years

  509     4     —       513     3.78  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total collateralized mortgage obligations - private label

  509     4     —       513     3.78  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

Within 1 year

  419     24     —       443     3.14  

After 1 to 5 years

  15,921     833     —       16,754     4.50  

After 5 to 10 years

  62,373     3,058     1,214     64,217     4.12  

After 10 years

  1,007,733     50,807     4,313     1,054,227     3.93  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total mortgage-backed securities

  1,086,446     54,722     5,527     1,135,641     3.95  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Equity securities (without contractual maturity)

  3,178     1,109     171     4,116     4.06  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other

After 1 to 5 years

  9,638     —       141     9,497     1.68  

After 10 years

  2,604     69     —       2,673     3.61  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other

  12,242     69     141     12,170     2.09  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 5,345,877   $ 79,357   $ 130,434   $ 5,294,800     2.30
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

205


The weighted average yield on investment securities available-for-sale is based on amortized cost; therefore, it does not give effect to changes in fair value.

Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations, mortgage-backed securities and certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer.

The following table presents the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of investment securities available-for-sale at December 31, 2014 by contractual maturity.

 

(In thousands)

   Amortized cost      Fair value  

Within 1 year

   $ 44,905      $ 45,302  

After 1 to 5 years

     2,342,575        2,337,690  

After 5 to 10 years

     264,266        268,084  

After 10 years

     2,654,153        2,661,461  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  5,305,899     5,312,537  

Equity securities

  1,351     2,622  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 5,307,250   $ 5,315,159  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation sold U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations with an approximate amortized cost of $311.1 million (2013 – equity securities with an approximate amortized cost of $3.3 million). The proceeds from these sales were $ 310.2 million (2013 - $ 5.4 million). Gross realized gains and losses on the sale of investment securities available-for-sale, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Gross realized gains

   $ 4,461      $ 2,110      $ 65  

Gross realized losses

     (5,331      —          (1,684
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net realized (losses) gains on sale of investment securities available-for-sale

$ (870 $ 2,110   $ (1,619
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

206


The following tables present the Corporation’s fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2014, and 2013.

 

     At December 31, 2014  
     Less than 12 months      12 months or more      Total  

(In thousands)

   Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
 

U.S. Treasury securities

   $ 49,465      $ 75      $ —        $ —        $ 49,465      $ 75  

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

     888,325        6,866        429,835        5,525        1,318,160        12,391  

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

     14,419        3,031        41,084        10,518        55,503        13,549  

Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

     539,658        13,774        733,814        25,029        1,273,472        38,803  

Mortgage-backed securities

     457        4        25,486        680        25,943        684  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position

$ 1,492,324   $ 23,750   $ 1,230,219   $ 41,752   $ 2,722,543   $ 65,502  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     At December 31, 2013  
     Less than 12 months      12 months or more      Total  

(In thousands)

   Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
 

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

   $ 1,326,866      $ 32,457      $ 69,257      $ 4,240      $ 1,396,123      $ 36,697  

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

     54,256        11,685        8,330        190        62,586        11,875  

Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

     1,567,654        70,378        96,676        5,645        1,664,330        76,023  

Mortgage-backed securities

     105,455        4,762        7,225        765        112,680        5,527  

Equity securities

     1,657        171        —          —          1,657        171  

Other

     —          —          9,497        141        9,497        141  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities available-for-sale in an unrealized loss position

$ 3,055,888   $ 119,453   $ 190,985   $ 10,981   $ 3,246,873   $ 130,434  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2014, the available-for-sale investment portfolio reflects gross unrealized losses of approximately $66 million, driven by U.S. Agency Collateralized Mortgage Obligations, obligations from the U.S. Government sponsored entities, and obligations of the Puerto Rico Government and its political subdivisions. As part of its analysis for all US Agencies’ securities, management considers the U.S. Agency guarantee.

In February 2014, the three principal nationally recognized rating agencies (Moody’s Investor Services, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings) downgraded the general-obligation bonds of the Commonwealth and other obligations of Puerto Rico instrumentalities to non-investment grade categories, citing concerns about financial flexibility and a reduced capacity to borrow in the financial markets. In July 2014, the Puerto Rico general obligations were further downgraded by the rating agencies, after the Commonwealth enacted a law that allowed certain Puerto Rico public corporations to restructure their debt.

On February 12, 2015, S&P further downgraded the debt rating of the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities. S&P stated that, in their view, Puerto Rico’s current economic and financial trajectory is now more susceptible to adverse financial, economic and market conditions that could ultimately impair the Commonwealth’s ability to fund services and its debt commitments. S&P also cited implementation risk with respect to the value-added tax and expressed concern that, while higher taxes could improve the budget balance, there could be potential negative economic implications. On February 19, 2015, Moody’s also downgraded its debt ratings for the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities, citing similar concerns as S&P. The portfolio of obligations of the Puerto Rico Government is comprised of securities with specific sources of income or revenues identified for repayments. The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers.

Management evaluates investment securities for other-than-temporary (“OTTI”) declines in fair value on a quarterly basis. Once a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, the value of a debt security is reduced and a corresponding charge to

 

207


earnings is recognized for anticipated credit losses. Also, for equity securities that are considered other-than-temporarily impaired, the excess of the security’s carrying value over its fair value at the evaluation date is accounted for as a loss in the results of operations. The OTTI analysis requires management to consider various factors, which include, but are not limited to: (1) the length of time and the extent to which fair value has been less than the amortized cost basis, (2) the financial condition of the issuer or issuers, (3) actual collateral attributes, (4) the payment structure of the debt security and the likelihood of the issuer being able to make payments, (5) any rating changes by a rating agency, (6) adverse conditions specifically related to the security, industry, or a geographic area, and (7) management’s intent to sell the debt security or whether it is more likely than not that the Corporation would be required to sell the debt security before a forecasted recovery occurs.

At December 31, 2014, management performed its quarterly analysis of all debt securities in an unrealized loss position. Based on the analyses performed, management concluded that no individual debt security was other-than-temporarily impaired as of such date. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation did not have the intent to sell debt securities in an unrealized loss position and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell the investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.

The following table states the name of issuers, and the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of the securities of such issuer (includes available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities), in which the aggregate amortized cost of such securities exceeds 10% of stockholders’ equity. This information excludes securities backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Investments in obligations issued by a state of the U.S. and its political subdivisions and agencies, which are payable and secured by the same source of revenue or taxing authority, other than the U.S. Government, are considered securities of a single issuer.

 

     2014      2013  

(In thousands)

   Amortized cost      Fair value      Amortized cost      Fair value  

FNMA

   $ 1,746,807      $ 1,736,987      $ 2,318,171      $ 2,266,610  

FHLB

     737,149        732,894        336,933        326,220  

Freddie Mac

     1,117,865        1,112,485        1,434,346        1,418,216  

Note 10 – Investment securities held-to-maturity

The following tables present the amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, approximate fair value, weighted average yield and contractual maturities of investment securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     At December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Amortized
cost
     Gross
unrealized
gains
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Weighted
average
yield
 

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

              

Within 1 year

   $ 2,740      $ —        $ 8      $ 2,732        5.84

After 1 to 5 years

     12,830        —          764        12,066        5.95  

After 5 to 10 years

     21,325        —          6,003        15,322        6.09  

After 10 years

     64,678        3,342        5,543        62,477        2.22  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

  101,573     3,342     12,318     92,597     3.60  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

After 5 to 10 years

  97     5     —       102     5.45  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

  97     5     —       102     5.45  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other

Within 1 year

  250     —       —       250     1.33  

After 1 to 5 years

  1,250     —       —       1,250     1.10  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other

  1,500     —       —       1,500     1.14  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 103,170   $ 3,347   $ 12,318   $ 94,199     3.57
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

208


     At December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Amortized
cost
     Gross
unrealized
gains
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Weighted
average
yield
 

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

              

Within 1 year

   $ 12,570      $ —        $ 12      $ 12,558        2.06

After 1 to 5 years

     12,060        —          984        11,076        5.91  

After 5 to 10 years

     20,015        —          5,251        14,764        6.06  

After 10 years

     69,236        257        13,179        56,314        2.43  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

  113,881     257     19,426     94,712     3.40  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

After 10 years

  115     7     —       122     5.45  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

  115     7     —       122     5.45  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other

Within 1 year

  26,000     —       645     25,355     3.41  

After 1 to 5 years

  500     —       1     499     1.33  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other

  26,500     —       646     25,854     3.37  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 140,496   $ 264   $ 20,072   $ 120,688     3.40
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Securities not due on a single contractual maturity date, such as collateralized mortgage obligations, are classified in the period of final contractual maturity. The expected maturities of collateralized mortgage obligations and certain other securities may differ from their contractual maturities because they may be subject to prepayments or may be called by the issuer.

The following table presents the aggregate amortized cost and fair value of investments securities held-to-maturity at December 31, 2014 by contractual maturity.

 

(In thousands)

   Amortized cost      Fair value  

Within 1 year

   $ 2,990      $ 2,982  

After 1 to 5 years

     14,080        13,316  

After 5 to 10 years

     21,422        15,424  

After 10 years

     64,678        62,477  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 103,170   $ 94,199  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following tables present the Corporation’s fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

     At December 31, 2014  
     Less than 12 months      12 months or more      Total  

(In thousands)

   Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
 

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

   $ 373      $ 2      $ 45,969      $ 12,316      $ 46,342      $ 12,318  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized loss position

$ 373   $ 2   $ 45,969   $ 12,316   $ 46,342   $ 12,318  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

209


     At December 31, 2013  
     Less than 12 months      12 months or more      Total  

(In thousands)

   Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Gross
unrealized
losses
 

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

   $ 60,028      $ 12,180      $ 13,044      $ 7,246      $ 73,072      $ 19,426  

Other

     24,604        646        —           —           24,604        646  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities held-to-maturity in an unrealized loss position

$ 84,632   $ 12,826   $ 13,044   $ 7,246   $ 97,676   $ 20,072  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As indicated in Note 9 to these consolidated financial statements, management evaluates investment securities for OTTI declines in fair value on a quarterly basis.

The “Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions” classified as held-to-maturity at December 31, 2014 are primarily associated with securities issued by municipalities of Puerto Rico and are generally not rated by a credit rating agency. This includes $61 million of securities issued by three municipalities of Puerto Rico that are payable from the real and personal property taxes collected within such municipalities. These bonds have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality. The portfolio also includes approximately $41 million in securities for which the underlying source of payment is not the central government, but in which it provides a guarantee in the event of default. In February 2014, the three principal nationally recognized rating agencies (Moody’s Investor Services, Standard and Poor’s and Fitch Ratings) downgraded the general-obligation bonds of the Commonwealth and other obligations of Puerto Rico instrumentalities to non-investment grade categories, citing concerns about financial flexibility and a reduced capacity to borrow in the financial markets. In July 2014, the Puerto Rico general obligations were further downgraded by the rating agencies, after the Commonwealth enacted a law that allowed certain Puerto Rico public corporations to restructure their debt.

On February 12, 2015, S&P further downgraded the debt rating of the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities. S&P stated that, in their view, Puerto Rico’s current economic and financial trajectory is now more susceptible to adverse financial, economic and market conditions that could ultimately impair the Commonwealth’s ability to fund services and its debt commitments. S&P also cited implementation risk with respect to the value-added tax and expressed concern that, while higher taxes could improve the budget balance, there could be potential negative economic implications. On February 19, 2015, Moody’s also downgraded its debt ratings for the Commonwealth general obligation bonds and of various public instrumentalities, citing similar concerns as S&P.

The Corporation performs periodic credit quality reviews on these issuers. The Corporation does not have the intent to sell securities held-to-maturity and it is not more likely than not that the Corporation will have to sell these investment securities prior to recovery of their amortized cost basis.

Note 11 – Loans

Covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, except for lines of credit with revolving privileges, are accounted for by the Corporation in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30. Under ASC Subtopic 310-30, the acquired loans were aggregated into pools based on similar characteristics. Each loan pool is accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. The covered loans which are accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by the Corporation are not considered non-performing and will continue to have an accretable yield as long as there is a reasonable expectation about the timing and amount of cash flows expected to be collected. The Corporation measures additional losses for this portfolio when it is probable the Corporation will be unable to collect all cash flows expected at acquisition plus additional cash flows expected to be collected arising from changes in estimates after acquisition. Lines of credit with revolving privileges that were acquired as part of the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction are accounted for under the guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loan payment receivable in excess of the Corporation’s initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income. Loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 are placed in non-accrual status when past due in accordance with the Corporation’s non-accruing policy and any accretion of discount is discontinued.

The risks on loans acquired in the FDIC-assisted transaction are significantly different from the risks on loans not covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements because of the loss protection provided by the FDIC. Accordingly, the Corporation presents loans subject to the loss sharing agreements as “covered loans” in the information below and loans that are not subject to the FDIC loss

 

210


sharing agreements as “non-covered loans”. The FDIC loss sharing agreements expires at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2015 for commercial (including construction) and consumer loans, and at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2020 for single-family residential mortgage loans, as explained in Note 13.

For a summary of the accounting policy related to loans, interest recognition and allowance for loan losses refer to the summary of significant accounting policies included in Note 2 to these consolidated financial statements.

The following table presents the composition of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio (“HIP”), net of unearned income, at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Commercial multi-family

   $ 487,280      $ 1,175,937  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     2,526,146        2,970,505  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     1,667,267        2,166,545  

Commercial and industrial

     3,453,574        3,724,197  

Construction

     251,820        206,084  

Mortgage

     6,502,886        6,681,476  

Leasing

     564,389        543,761  

Legacy [2]

     80,818        211,135  

Consumer:

     

Credit cards

     1,155,229        1,185,272  

Home equity lines of credit

     366,162        478,211  

Personal

     1,375,452        1,349,119  

Auto

     767,369        699,980  

Other

     206,059        219,644  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio [1]

$ 19,404,451   $ 21,611,866  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio at December 31, 2014 are net of $94 million in unearned income and exclude $106 million in loans held-for-sale (December 31, 2013 - $92 million in unearned income and $110 million in loans held-for-sale).
[2] The legacy portfolio is comprised of commercial loans, construction loans and lease financings related to certain lending products exited by the Corporation as part of restructuring efforts carried out in prior years at the BPNA segment.

The following table presents the composition of covered loans at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Commercial real estate

   $ 1,511,472      $ 1,710,229  

Commercial and industrial

     103,309        102,575  

Construction

     70,336        190,127  

Mortgage

     822,986        934,373  

Consumer

     34,559        47,123  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 2,542,662   $ 2,984,427  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table provides a breakdown of loans held-for-sale (“LHFS”) at December 31, 2014 and 2013 by main categories.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Commercial

   $ 309      $ 603  

Legacy

     319        —    

Mortgage

     100,166        109,823  

Consumer

     5,310        —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-for-sale

$ 106,104   $ 110,426  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

211


During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation recorded purchases (including repurchases) of mortgage loans amounting to $574 million (2013 - $1.9 billion). For 2013, this includes two bulk purchases of $761 million in mortgage loans to financial institutions in Puerto Rico. Additionally, the Corporation recorded purchases of $92 million in consumer loans during the year ended December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $42 million) and purchases of $24 million in commercial loans during the year ended December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $15 million).

The Corporation performed whole-loan sales involving approximately $185 million of residential mortgage loans during the year ended December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $661 million). During the third quarter of 2014, BPNA sold approximately $115.7 million and reclassified to held-for-sale approximately $105.0 million in classified and legacy residential mortgage and commercial loans. The 2013 activity included $435 million from the bulk sale of non-performing mortgage loans, completed during the quarter ended June 30, 2013. Also, during the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation securitized approximately $675 million of mortgage loans into Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) mortgage-backed securities and $225 million of mortgage loans into Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) mortgage-backed securities, compared to $920 million and $438 million, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2013. The Corporation did not securitize mortgage loans into Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) mortgage-backed securities during the year ended December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $33 million).The Corporation sold commercial and construction loans with a book value of approximately $260 million during the year ended December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $421 million). The sales activity for 2013 included $401 million from the bulk sale of non-performing commercial and construction loans completed during the quarter ended March 31, 2013.

Non-covered loans

The following tables present non-covered loans held-in-portfolio by loan class that are in non-performing status or are accruing interest but are past due 90 days or more at December 31, 2014 and 2013. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more consist primarily of credit cards, FHA / VA, and other insured mortgage loans, and delinquent mortgage loans which are included in the Corporation’s financial statements pursuant to GNMA’s buy-back option program. Servicers of loans underlying GNMA mortgage-backed securities must report as their own assets the defaulted loans that they have the option (but not the obligation) to repurchase, even when they elect not to exercise that option. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more also include reverse mortgage loans in Puerto Rico which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets. In addition, accruing loans past due 90 days or more include residential conventional loans purchased from another financial institution that, although delinquent, the Corporation has received timely payment from the seller / servicer, and, in some instances, have partial guarantees under recourse agreements. However, residential conventional loans purchased from another financial institution, which are in the process of foreclosure, are classified as non-performing mortgage loans.

 

At December 31, 2014

 
     Puerto Rico      U.S. mainland      Popular, Inc.  

(In thousands)

   Non-accrual
loans
     Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more
     Non-accrual
loans
     Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more
     Non-accrual
loans
     Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more
 

Commercial multi-family

   $ 2,199      $ —        $ —        $ —        $ 2,199      $ —    

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     33,452        —          —          —          33,452        —    

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     92,648        —          805        —          93,453        —    

Commercial and industrial

     129,611        494        1,510        —          131,121        494  

Construction

     13,812        —          —          —          13,812        —    

Mortgage [2][3]

     295,629        426,387        9,284        —          304,913        426,387  

Leasing

     3,102        —          —          —          3,102        —    

Legacy

     —          —          1,545        —          1,545        —    

Consumer:

                 

Credit cards

     —          20,368        449        —          449        20,368  

Home equity lines of credit

     —          21        4,090        —          4,090        21  

Personal

     25,678        10        1,410        —          27,088        10  

Auto

     11,387        —          —          —          11,387        —    

Other

     3,865        682        7        —          3,872        682  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total [1]

$ 611,383   $ 447,962   $ 19,100   $ —     $ 630,483   $ 447,962  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $ 19 million in non-performing loans held-for-sale.

 

212


[2] Non-covered loans of $59 million accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analysis.
[3] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $125 million of residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of December 31, 2014. Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $66 million in reverse mortgage loans in Puerto Rico which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets.

 

At December 31, 2013

 
     Puerto Rico      U.S. mainland      Popular, Inc.  

(In thousands)

   Non-accrual
loans
     Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more
     Non-accrual
loans
     Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more
     Non-accrual
loans
     Accruing
loans past-due
90 days or more
 

Commercial multi-family

   $ 4,944      $ —        $ 20,894      $ —        $ 25,838      $ —    

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     41,959        —          42,413        —          84,372        —    

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     83,441        —          23,507        —          106,948        —    

Commercial and industrial

     55,753        556        6,142        —          61,895        556  

Construction

     18,108        —          5,663        —          23,771        —    

Mortgage [2][3]

     206,389        395,645        26,292        —          232,681        395,645  

Leasing

     3,495        —          —          —          3,495        —    

Legacy

     —          —          15,050        —          15,050        —    

Consumer:

                 

Credit cards

     —          20,313        486        —          486        20,313  

Home equity lines of credit

     —          147        8,632        —          8,632        147  

Personal

     17,054        54        1,591        —          18,645        54  

Auto

     10,562        —          2        —          10,564        —    

Other

     5,550        585        21        —          5,571        585  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total [1]

$ 447,255   $ 417,300   $ 150,693   $ —     $ 597,948   $ 417,300  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] For purposes of this table non-performing loans exclude $ 1 million in non-performing loans held-for-sale.
[2] Non-covered loans by $43 million accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analysis.
[3] It is the Corporation’s policy to report delinquent residential mortgage loans insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA as accruing loans past due 90 days or more as opposed to non-performing since the principal repayment is insured. These balances include $115 million of residential mortgage loans in Puerto Rico insured by FHA or guaranteed by the VA that are no longer accruing interest as of December 31, 2013. Furthermore, the Corporation has approximately $50 million in reverse mortgage loans in Puerto Rico which are guaranteed by FHA, but which are currently not accruing interest. Due to the guaranteed nature of the loans, it is the Corporation’s policy to exclude these balances from non-performing assets.

The following tables present loans by past due status at December 31, 2014 and 2013 for non-covered loans held-in-portfolio (net of unearned income).

 

December 31, 2014

 

Puerto Rico

 
     Past due             Non-covered  

(In thousands)

   30-59
days
     60-89
days
     90 days
or more
     Total
past due
     Current      loans HIP
Puerto Rico
 

Commercial multi-family

   $ 221      $ 69      $ 2,199      $ 2,489      $ 77,588      $ 80,077  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     9,828        121        33,452        43,401        1,970,178        2,013,579  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     8,954        7,709        92,648        109,311        1,364,051        1,473,362  

Commercial and industrial

     18,498        5,269        130,105        153,872        2,653,913        2,807,785  

Construction

     2,497        —          13,812        16,309        143,075        159,384  

Mortgage

     304,319        167,219        780,678        1,252,216        4,198,285        5,450,501  

Leasing

     6,779        1,246        3,102        11,127        553,262        564,389  

Consumer:

                 

Credit cards

     13,715        9,290        20,368        43,373        1,096,791        1,140,164  

Home equity lines of credit

     137        159        21        317        13,083        13,400  

Personal

     13,479        6,646        25,688        45,813        1,216,720        1,262,533  

Auto

     34,238        8,397        11,387        54,022        713,274        767,296  

Other

     1,009        209        4,547        5,765        199,879        205,644  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 413,674   $ 206,334   $ 1,118,007   $ 1,738,015   $ 14,200,099   $ 15,938,114  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

213


December 31, 2014

 

U.S. mainland

 
     Past due                
     30-59      60-89      90 days      Total             Loans HIP  

(In thousands)

   days      days      or more      past due      Current      U.S. mainland  

Commercial multi-family

   $ 87      $ 376      $ —        $ 463      $ 406,740      $ 407,203  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     1,478        —          —          1,478        511,089        512,567  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     45        3,631        805        4,481        189,424        193,905  

Commercial and industrial

     1,133        123        1,510        2,766        643,023        645,789  

Construction

     810        —          —          810        91,626        92,436  

Mortgage

     29,582        8,646        9,284        47,512        1,004,873        1,052,385  

Legacy

     929        1,931        1,545        4,405        76,413        80,818  

Consumer:

                 

Credit cards

     314        246        449        1,009        14,056        15,065  

Home equity lines of credit

     5,036        1,025        4,090        10,151        342,611        352,762  

Personal

     2,476        893        1,410        4,779        108,140        112,919  

Auto

     —          —          —          —          73        73  

Other

     10        4        7        21        394        415  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 41,900   $ 16,875   $ 19,100   $ 77,875   $ 3,388,462   $ 3,466,337  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

Popular, Inc.

 
     Past due             Non-covered  

(In thousands)

   30-59
days
     60-89
days
     90 days
or more
     Total
past due
     Current      loans HIP
Popular, Inc.
 

Commercial multi-family

   $ 308      $ 445      $ 2,199      $ 2,952      $ 484,328      $ 487,280  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     11,306        121        33,452        44,879        2,481,267        2,526,146  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     8,999        11,340        93,453        113,792        1,553,475        1,667,267  

Commercial and industrial

     19,631        5,392        131,615        156,638        3,296,936        3,453,574  

Construction

     3,307        —          13,812        17,119        234,701        251,820  

Mortgage

     333,901        175,865        789,962        1,299,728        5,203,158        6,502,886  

Leasing

     6,779        1,246        3,102        11,127        553,262        564,389  

Legacy

     929        1,931        1,545        4,405        76,413        80,818  

Consumer:

                 

Credit cards

     14,029        9,536        20,817        44,382        1,110,847        1,155,229  

Home equity lines of credit

     5,173        1,184        4,111        10,468        355,694        366,162  

Personal

     15,955        7,539        27,098        50,592        1,324,860        1,375,452  

Auto

     34,238        8,397        11,387        54,022        713,347        767,369  

Other

     1,019        213        4,554        5,786        200,273        206,059  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 455,574   $ 223,209   $ 1,137,107   $ 1,815,890   $ 17,588,561   $ 19,404,451  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

214


December 31, 2013

 

Puerto Rico

 
     Past due             Non-covered  
     30-59      60-89      90 days      Total             loans HIP  

(In thousands)

   days      days      or more      past due      Current      Puerto Rico  

Commercial multi-family

   $ 446      $ —        $ 4,944      $ 5,390      $ 77,013      $ 82,403  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     13,889        349        41,959        56,197        1,808,021        1,864,218  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     13,725        8,318        83,441        105,484        1,501,019        1,606,503  

Commercial and industrial

     9,960        4,463        56,309        70,732        2,841,734        2,912,466  

Construction

     2,329        —          18,108        20,437        140,734        161,171  

Mortgage

     316,663        154,882        645,444        1,116,989        4,283,690        5,400,679  

Leasing

     7,457        1,607        3,495        12,559        531,202        543,761  

Consumer:

                 

Credit cards

     13,797        9,991        20,313        44,101        1,125,520        1,169,621  

Home equity lines of credit

     133        53        147        333        14,845        15,178  

Personal

     12,897        6,794        17,108        36,799        1,177,085        1,213,884  

Auto

     31,340        9,361        10,562        51,263        648,228        699,491  

Other

     1,834        859        6,135        8,828        209,636        218,464  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 424,470   $ 196,677   $ 907,965   $ 1,529,112   $ 14,358,727   $ 15,887,839  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

U.S. mainland

 
     Past due                
     30-59      60-89      90 days      Total             Loans HIP  

(In thousands)

   days      days      or more      past due      Current      U.S. mainland  

Commercial multi-family

   $ 3,621      $ 1,675      $ 20,894      $ 26,190      $ 1,067,344      $ 1,093,534  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     4,255        —          42,413        46,668        1,059,619        1,106,287  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     657        8,452        23,507        32,616        527,426        560,042  

Commercial and industrial

     2,331        2,019        6,142        10,492        801,239        811,731  

Construction

     —          —          5,663        5,663        39,250        44,913  

Mortgage

     30,713        9,630        26,292        66,635        1,214,162        1,280,797  

Legacy

     9,079        2,098        15,050        26,227        184,908        211,135  

Consumer:

                 

Credit cards

     285        200        486        971        14,680        15,651  

Home equity lines of credit

     2,794        2,198        8,632        13,624        449,409        463,033  

Personal

     3,196        826        1,591        5,613        129,622        135,235  

Auto

     11        —          2        13        476        489  

Other

     43        50        21        114        1,066        1,180  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 56,985   $ 27,148   $ 150,693   $ 234,826   $ 5,489,201   $ 5,724,027  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

215


December 31, 2013

 

Popular, Inc.

 
     Past due             Non-covered  

(In thousands)

   30-59
days
     60-89
days
     90 days
or more
     Total
past due
     Current      loans HIP
Popular, Inc.
 

Commercial multi-family

   $ 4,067      $ 1,675      $ 25,838      $ 31,580      $ 1,144,357      $ 1,175,937  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     18,144        349        84,372        102,865        2,867,640        2,970,505  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     14,382        16,770        106,948        138,100        2,028,445        2,166,545  

Commercial and industrial

     12,291        6,482        62,451        81,224        3,642,973        3,724,197  

Construction

     2,329        —          23,771        26,100        179,984        206,084  

Mortgage

     347,376        164,512        671,736        1,183,624        5,497,852        6,681,476  

Leasing

     7,457        1,607        3,495        12,559        531,202        543,761  

Legacy

     9,079        2,098        15,050        26,227        184,908        211,135  

Consumer:

                 

Credit cards

     14,082        10,191        20,799        45,072        1,140,200        1,185,272  

Home equity lines of credit

     2,927        2,251        8,779        13,957        464,254        478,211  

Personal

     16,093        7,620        18,699        42,412        1,306,707        1,349,119  

Auto

     31,351        9,361        10,564        51,276        648,704        699,980  

Other

     1,877        909        6,156        8,942        210,702        219,644  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 481,455   $ 223,825   $ 1,058,658   $ 1,763,938   $ 19,847,928   $ 21,611,866  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table provides a breakdown of loans held-for-sale (“LHFS”) in non-performing status at December 31, 2014 and 2013 by main categories.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Commercial

   $ 309      $ 603  

Mortgage

     14,041        489  

Consumer

     4,549        —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 18,899   $ 1,092  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The outstanding principal balance of non-covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, net of amounts charged off by the Corporation, amounted to $243 million at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $197 million). At December 31, 2014, none of the acquired non-covered loans accounted under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all acquired loans.

Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the non-covered loans accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

 

Activity in the accretable yield - Non-covered loans ASC 310-30

 
     For the years ended  

(In thousands)

   December 31,
2014
     December 31,
2013
 

Beginning balance

   $ 49,398      $ —    

Additions

     19,190        60,805  

Accretion

     (10,074      (7,396

Change in expected cash flows

     57,790        (4,011
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 116,304   $ 49,398  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

216


Carrying amount of non-covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30

 
     For the years ended  

(In thousands)

   December 31,
2014
     December 31,
2013
 

Beginning balance

   $ 173,659      $ —    

Additions

     58,799        195,283  

Accretion

     10,074        7,396  

Collections and charge-offs

     (29,769      (29,020
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 212,763   $ 173,659  

Allowance for loan losses ASC 310-30 non-covered loans

  (16,159   (14,536
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance, net of allowance for loan losses

$ 196,604   $ 159,123  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The components of the net financing leases receivable at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Total minimum lease payments

   $ 497,895      $ 493,022  

Estimated residual value of leased property

     149,079        134,198  

Deferred origination costs, net of fees

     8,727        7,773  

Less - Unearned financing income

     89,552        88,230  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net minimum lease payments

  566,149     546,763  

Less - Allowance for loan losses

  7,184     10,737  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net minimum lease payments, net of allowance for loan losses

$ 558,965   $ 536,026  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014, future minimum lease payments are expected to be received as follows:

 

(In thousands)

      

2015

   $ 127,901  

2016

     112,768  

2017

     99,531  

2018

     83,518  

2019 and thereafter

     74,177  
  

 

 

 

Total

$ 497,895  
  

 

 

 

Covered loans

The following table presents covered loans in non-performing status and accruing loans past-due 90 days or more by loan class at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Non-accrual
loans
     Accruing loans past
due 90 days or more
     Non-accrual
loans
     Accruing loans past
due 90 days or more
 

Commercial real estate

   $ 8,810      $ —        $ 8,345      $ —    

Commercial and industrial

     1,142        —          7,335        456  

Construction

     2,770        —          11,872        —    

Mortgage

     4,376        28        1,739        69  

Consumer

     735        —          90        112  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total [1]

$ 17,833   $ 28   $ 29,381   $ 637  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 are excluded from the above table as they are considered to be performing due to the application of the accretion method, in which these loans will accrete interest income over the remaining life of the loans using estimated cash flow analyses.

 

217


The following tables present loans by past due status at December 31, 2014 and 2013 for covered loans held-in-portfolio. The information considers covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 and ASC Subtopic 310-30.

 

December 31, 2014

 
     Past due                
     30-59      60-89      90 days      Total             Covered  

(In thousands)

   days      days      or more      past due      Current      loans HIP  

Commercial real estate

   $ 98,559      $ 12,597      $ 291,010      $ 402,166      $ 1,109,306      $ 1,511,472  

Commercial and industrial

     512        7        7,756        8,275        95,034        103,309  

Construction

     —          384        58,665        59,049        11,287        70,336  

Mortgage

     45,764        23,531        143,140        212,435        610,551        822,986  

Consumer

     1,884        747        2,532        5,163        29,396        34,559  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total covered loans

$ 146,719   $ 37,266   $ 503,103   $ 687,088   $ 1,855,574   $ 2,542,662  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 
     Past due                
     30-59      60-89      90 days      Total             Covered  

(In thousands)

   days      days      or more      past due      Current      loans HIP  

Commercial real estate

   $ 42,898      $ 8,745      $ 374,301      $ 425,944      $ 1,284,285      $ 1,710,229  

Commercial and industrial

     1,584        349        16,318        18,251        84,324        102,575  

Construction

     399        —          178,007        178,406        11,721        190,127  

Mortgage

     50,222        23,384        165,030        238,636        695,737        934,373  

Consumer

     2,588        1,328        4,200        8,116        39,007        47,123  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total covered loans

$ 97,691   $ 33,806   $ 737,856   $ 869,353   $ 2,115,074   $ 2,984,427  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The carrying amount of the covered loans consisted of loans determined to be impaired at the time of acquisition, which are accounted for in accordance with ASC Subtopic 310-30 (“credit impaired loans”), and loans that were considered to be performing at the acquisition date, accounted for by analogy to ASC Subtopic 310-30 (“non-credit impaired loans”), as detailed in the following table.

 

     December 31, 2014     December 31, 2013  
     Carrying amount     Carrying amount  

(In thousands)

   Non-credit
impaired loans
    Credit impaired
loans
    Total     Non-credit
impaired loans
    Credit impaired
loans
    Total  

Commercial real estate

   $ 1,392,482     $ 90,202     $ 1,482,684     $ 1,483,331     $ 149,341     $ 1,632,672  

Commercial and industrial

     57,059       2,197       59,256       55,192       3,069       58,261  

Construction

     32,836       32,409       65,245       71,864       104,356       176,220  

Mortgage

     764,148       45,829       809,977       862,878       59,483       922,361  

Consumer

     25,617       1,393       27,010       35,810       2,623       38,433  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Carrying amount

  2,272,142     172,030     2,444,172     2,509,075     318,872     2,827,947  

Allowance for loan losses

  (52,798   (26,048   (78,846   (57,594   (36,321   (93,915
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Carrying amount, net of allowance

$ 2,219,344   $ 145,982   $ 2,365,326   $ 2,451,481   $ 282,551   $ 2,734,032  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The outstanding principal balance of covered loans accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30, net of amounts charged off by the Corporation, amounted to $3.1 billion at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $3.8 billion). At December 31, 2014, none of the acquired loans from the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 were considered non-performing loans. Therefore, interest income, through accretion of the difference between the carrying amount of the loans and the expected cash flows, was recognized on all acquired loans.

 

218


Changes in the carrying amount and the accretable yield for the covered loans accounted pursuant to the ASC Subtopic 310-30, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, were as follows:

 

     Activity in the accretable yield  
     Covered loans ASC 310-30  
     For the years ended  
     December 31, 2014     December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Non-credit
impaired
loans
    Credit
impaired
loans
    Total     Non-credit
impaired
loans
    Credit
impaired
loans
    Total  

Beginning balance

   $ 1,297,725     $ 11,480     $ 1,309,205     $ 1,446,381     $ 5,288     $ 1,451,669  

Accretion

     (268,063     (16,409     (284,472     (268,005     (11,703     (279,708

Change in expected cash flows

     236,090       10,514       246,604       119,349       17,895       137,244  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 1,265,752   $ 5,585   $ 1,271,337   $ 1,297,725   $ 11,480   $ 1,309,205  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     Carrying amount of loans accounted for pursuant to ASC 310-30  
     For the years ended  
     December 31, 2014     December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Non-credit
impaired
loans
    Credit
impaired
loans
    Total     Non-credit
impaired
loans
    Credit
impaired
loans
    Total  

Beginning balance

   $ 2,509,075     $ 318,872     $ 2,827,947     $ 3,051,964     $ 439,795     $ 3,491,759  

Accretion

     268,063       16,409       284,472       268,005       11,703       279,708  

Collections and charge offs

     (504,996     (163,251     (668,247     (810,894     (132,626     (943,520
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 2,272,142   $ 172,030   $ 2,444,172   $ 2,509,075   $ 318,872   $ 2,827,947  

Allowance for loan losses ASC 310-30 covered loans

  (52,798   (26,048   (78,846   (57,594   (36,321   (93,915
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance, net of ALLL

$ 2,219,344   $ 145,982   $ 2,365,326   $ 2,451,481   $ 282,551   $ 2,734,032  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Corporation accounts for lines of credit with revolving privileges under the accounting guidance of ASC Subtopic 310-20, which requires that any differences between the contractually required loans payment receivable in excess of the initial investment in the loans be accreted into interest income over the life of the loans, if the loan is accruing interest. Covered loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-20 amounted to $0.1 billion at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $0.2 billion).

 

219


Note 12 – Allowance for loan losses

The Corporation follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses to provide for inherent losses in the loan portfolio. This methodology includes the consideration of factors such as current economic conditions, portfolio risk characteristics, prior loss experience and results of periodic credit reviews of individual loans. The provision for loan losses charged to current operations is based on this methodology. Loan losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the allowance for loan losses.

The Corporation’s assessment of the allowance for loan losses is determined in accordance with the guidance of loss contingencies in ASC Subtopic 450-20 and loan impairment guidance in ASC Section 310-10-35. Also, the Corporation determines the allowance for loan losses on purchased impaired loans and purchased loans accounted for under ASC Subtopic 310-30 by analogy, by evaluating decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition date.

The accounting guidance provides for the recognition of a loss allowance for groups of homogeneous loans. The determination for general reserves of the allowance for loan losses includes the following principal factors:

 

   

Base net loss rates, which are based on the moving average of annualized net loss rates computed over a 3-year historical loss period for the commercial and construction loan portfolios, and an 18-month period for the consumer and mortgage loan portfolios. The base net loss rates are applied by loan type and by legal entity.

 

   

Recent loss trend adjustment, which replaces the base loss rate with a 12-month average loss rate, when these trends are higher than the respective base loss rates. The objective of this adjustment is to allow for a more recent loss trend to be captured and reflected in the ALLL estimation process. As part of the annual review of the components of the ALLL models, as discussed in the following paragraphs and implemented as of June 30, 2014, the Corporation eliminated the use of caps in the recent loss trend adjustment for the consumer and mortgage portfolios, among other enhancements. For the period ended December 31, 2013, the recent loss trend adjustment caps for the consumer and mortgage portfolios were triggered in only one portfolio segment within the Puerto Rico consumer portfolio. Management assessed the impact of the applicable cap through a review of qualitative factors that specifically considered the drivers of recent loss trends and changes to the portfolio composition. The related effect of the aforementioned cap was immaterial for the overall level of the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses for the Puerto Rico Consumer portfolio.

For the period ended December 31, 2014, 50% (December 31, 2013, 27%) of the ALLL for BPPR non-covered loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial, personal and auto loan portfolios for 2014, and in commercial multi-family, mortgage and leasing portfolios for 2013.

For the period ended December 31, 2014, 21% (December 31, 2013, 29%) of the ALLL for BPNA loan portfolios utilized the recent loss trend adjustment instead of the base loss. The effect of replacing the base loss with the recent loss trend adjustment was mainly concentrated in the commercial multi-family, commercial and industrial and legacy loan portfolios for 2014 and in the commercial multi-family, commercial real estate non-owner occupied, commercial and industrial loan portfolios for 2013.

 

   

Environmental factors, which include credit and macroeconomic indicators such as unemployment rate, economic activity index and delinquency rates, adopted to account for current market conditions that are likely to cause estimated credit losses to differ from historical losses. The Corporation reflects the effect of these environmental factors on each loan group as an adjustment that, as appropriate, increases the historical loss rate applied to each group. Environmental factors provide updated perspective on credit and economic conditions. Regression analysis is used to select these indicators and quantify the effect on the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses.

During the second quarter of 2014, management completed the annual review of the components of the ALLL models. As part of this review management updated core metrics and revised certain components related to the estimation process for evaluating the adequacy of the general reserve of the allowance for loan losses. These enhancements to the ALLL methodology, which are described in the paragraphs below, were implemented as of June 30, 2014 and resulted in a net decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $18.7 million for the non-covered portfolio and a net increase to the allowance for loan losses of $0.8 million for the covered portfolio.

 

220


Management made the following principal enhancements to the methodology during the second quarter of 2014:

 

   

Annual review and recalibration of the environmental factors adjustment. The environmental factor adjustments are developed by performing regression analyses on selected credit and economic indicators for each applicable loan segment. During the second quarter of 2014, the environmental factor models used to account for changes in current credit and macroeconomic conditions were reviewed and recalibrated based on the latest applicable trends. Management also revised the application of environmental factors to the historical loss rates to consider last 12 month trends of the applicable credit and macroeconomic indicators applied as an incremental adjustment to account for emerging risks not necessarily considered in the historical loss rates.

The combined effect of the aforementioned recalibration and enhancements to the environmental factors adjustment resulted in a decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $17 million at June 30, 2014, of which $14.1 million related to the non-covered BPPR segment and $3.7 million related to the BPNA segment, offset in part by a $0.8 million increase in the BPPR covered segment.

 

   

Increased the historical look-back period for determining the recent loss trend adjustment for consumer and mortgage loans. The Corporation increased the look-back period for assessing recent trends applicable to the determination of consumer and mortgage loan net charge-offs from 6 months to 12 months and eliminated the use of caps. Previously, the Corporation used a recent loss trend adjustment based on 6 months of net charge-offs up to a determined cap. Given the current overall consumer and mortgage credit quality improvements, management concluded that a 12-month look-back period for the recent loss trend adjustment aligns the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses methodology to current credit quality trends while limiting excessive pro-cyclicality given the longer look-back period analysis, thus, eliminating the aforementioned caps.

The combined effect of the aforementioned enhancements to the recent loss trend adjustment resulted in a decrease to the allowance for loan losses of $1 million at June 30, 2014, of which $0.9 million related to the non-covered BPPR segment and $0.1 million related to the BPNA segment.

The following tables present the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 

Puerto Rico - Non-covered loans

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Leasing     Consumer     Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

            

Beginning balance

   $ 128,150     $ 5,095     $ 130,330     $ 10,622     $ 152,578     $ 426,775  

Provision (reversal of provision)

     112,821       (3,121     34,530       470       98,149       242,849  

Charge-offs

     (70,402     (1,722     (45,389     (6,028     (122,400     (245,941

Recoveries

     31,020       5,231       1,389       2,067       25,745       65,452  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 201,589   $ 5,483   $ 120,860   $ 7,131   $ 154,072   $ 489,135  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 

Puerto Rico - Covered loans

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Leasing     Consumer     Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

            

Beginning balance

   $ 42,198     $ 19,491     $ 36,006     $ —       $ 4,397     $ 102,092  

Provision (reversal of provision)

     21,579       15,397       13,384       —         (4,225     46,135  

Charge-offs

     (34,741     (36,223     (9,156     —         2,589       (77,531

Recoveries

     1,835       8,537       714       —         291       11,377  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 30,871   $ 7,202   $ 40,948   $ —     $ 3,052   $ 82,073  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

221


For the year ended December 31, 2014

 

U.S. Mainland - Continuing Operations

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Legacy     Consumer     Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

            

Beginning balance

   $ 24,930     $ 214     $ 26,599     $ 11,335     $ 19,205     $ 82,283  

Allowance transferred from discontinued operations

     7,984       —         —         —         —         7,984  

Provision (reversal of provision)

     (2,979     736       (15,410     (8,611     7,414       (18,850

Charge-offs

     (16,628     —         (3,517     (8,071     (15,948     (44,164

Recoveries

     15,523       237       2,321       17,141       3,783       39,005  

Net write-down related to loans transferred to LHFS

     (19,182     —         (7,531     (8,850     (111     (35,674
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 9,648   $ 1,187   $ 2,462   $ 2,944   $ 14,343   $ 30,584  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 

U.S. Mainland - Discontinued Operations

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Legacy     Consumer     Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

            

Beginning balance

   $ 21,902     $ 33     $ —       $ 2,369     $ 5,101     $ 29,405  

Allowance transferred to continuing operations

     (7,984     —         —         —         —         (7,984

Provision (reversal of provision)

     (2,831     (226     —         (1,812     (1,895     (6,764

Charge-offs

     (2,995     —         —         (557     (900     (4,452

Recoveries

     8,283       220       —         1,400       94       9,997  

Net write-downs related to loans transferred to discontinued operations

     (16,375     (27     —         (1,400     (2,400     (20,202
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ —     $ —     $ —     $ —     $ —     $ —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 

Popular, Inc.

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Legacy     Leasing     Consumer     Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

              

Beginning balance

   $ 217,180     $ 24,833     $ 192,935     $ 13,704     $ 10,622     $ 181,281     $ 640,555  

Provision (reversal of provision)

     128,590       12,786       32,504       (10,423     470       99,443       263,370  

Charge-offs

     (124,766     (37,945     (58,062     (8,628     (6,028     (136,659     (372,088

Recoveries

     56,661       14,225       4,424       18,541       2,067       29,913       125,831  

Net write-down related to loans transferred to LHFS

     (19,182     —         (7,531     (8,850     —         (111     (35,674

Net write-downs related to loans transferred to discontinued operations

     (16,375     (27     —         (1,400     —         (2,400     (20,202
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 242,108   $ 13,872   $ 164,270   $ 2,944   $ 7,131   $ 171,467   $ 601,792  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

 

Puerto Rico - Non-covered loans

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Leasing     Consumer     Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

            

Beginning balance

   $ 217,615     $ 5,862     $ 119,027     $ 2,894     $ 99,899     $ 445,297  

Provision (reversal of provision)

     157,433       (7,563     258,541       11,234       128,239       547,884  

Charge-offs

     (112,266     (6,757     (49,418     (6,034     (113,616     (288,091

Recoveries

     26,665       15,399       1,682       2,528       38,056       84,330  

Net write-downs related to loans sold

     (161,297     (1,846     (199,502     —         —         (362,645
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 128,150   $ 5,095   $ 130,330   $ 10,622   $ 152,578   $ 426,775  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

222


For the year ended December 31, 2013

 

Puerto Rico - Covered Loans

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Leasing     Consumer     Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

            

Beginning balance

   $ 72,060     $ 9,946     $ 20,914     $ —       $ 5,986     $ 108,906  

Provision (reversal of provision)

     (2,255     43,653       25,706       —         2,292       69,396  

Charge-offs

     (28,422     (39,730     (10,679     —         (3,952     (82,783

Recoveries

     815       5,622       65       —         71       6,573  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 42,198   $ 19,491   $ 36,006   $ —     $ 4,397   $ 102,092  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

 

U.S. Mainland - Continuing Operations

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Legacy     Consumer     Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

            

Beginning balance

   $ 37,554     $ 1,196     $ 30,348     $ 29,070     $ 26,383     $ 124,551  

Provision (reversal of provision)

     (3,440     (982     4,054       (21,632     10,826       (11,174

Charge-offs

     (26,116     —         (10,156     (17,423     (21,622     (75,317

Recoveries

     16,932       —         2,353       21,320       3,618       44,223  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 24,930   $ 214   $ 26,599   $ 11,335   $ 19,205   $ 82,283  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

 

U.S. Mainland - Discontinued Operations

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Legacy     Consumer     Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

            

Beginning balance

   $ 42,513     $ 371     $ —       $ 4,032     $ 4,937     $ 51,853  

Provision (reversal of provision)

     (6,427     (338     —         (349     3,571       (3,543

Charge-offs

     (29,954     —         —         (5,105     (3,898     (38,957

Recoveries

     15,770       —         —         3,791       491       20,052  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 21,902   $ 33   $ —     $ 2,369   $ 5,101   $ 29,405  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

 

Popular, Inc.

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial     Construction     Mortgage     Legacy     Leasing     Consumer     Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

              

Beginning balance

   $ 369,742     $ 17,375     $ 170,289     $ 33,102     $ 2,894     $ 137,205     $ 730,607  

Provision (reversal of provision)

     145,311       34,770       288,301       (21,981     11,234       144,928       602,563  

Charge-offs

     (196,758     (46,487     (70,253     (22,528     (6,034     (143,088     (485,148

Recoveries

     60,182       21,021       4,100       25,111       2,528       42,236       155,178  

Net write-down related to loans sold

     (161,297     (1,846     (199,502     —         —         —         (362,645
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 217,180   $ 24,833   $ 192,935   $ 13,704   $ 10,622   $ 181,281   $ 640,555  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table provides the activity in the allowance for loan losses related to covered loans accounted for pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30.

 

     ASC 310-30 Covered loans  
     For the years ended  

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 93,915      $ 95,407  

Provision for loan losses

     48,559        58,858  

Net charge-offs

     (63,628      (60,350
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

$ 78,846   $ 93,915  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

223


The following tables present information at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 regarding loan ending balances and the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment and whether such loans and the allowance pertains to loans individually or collectively evaluated for impairment.

 

At December 31, 2014

 

Puerto Rico

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial      Construction      Mortgage      Leasing      Consumer      Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

                 

Specific ALLL non-covered loans

   $ 64,736      $ 363      $ 45,838      $ 770      $ 27,796      $ 139,503  

General ALLL non-covered loans

     136,853        5,120        75,022        6,361        126,276        349,632  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

ALLL - non-covered loans

  201,589     5,483     120,860     7,131     154,072     489,135  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Specific ALLL covered loans

  5     —       —       —       —       5  

General ALLL covered loans

  30,866     7,202     40,948     —       3,052     82,068  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

ALLL - covered loans

  30,871     7,202     40,948     —       3,052     82,073  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ALLL

$ 232,460   $ 12,685   $ 161,808   $ 7,131   $ 157,124   $ 571,208  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired non-covered loans

$ 356,911   $ 13,268   $ 431,569   $ 3,023   $ 115,759   $ 920,530  

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

  6,017,892     146,116     5,018,932     561,366     3,273,278     15,017,584  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

  6,374,803     159,384     5,450,501     564,389     3,389,037     15,938,114  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired covered loans

  4,487     2,419     —       —       —       6,906  

Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

  1,610,294     67,917     822,986     —       34,559     2,535,756  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Covered loans held-in-portfolio

  1,614,781     70,336     822,986     —       34,559     2,542,662  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 7,989,584   $ 229,720   $ 6,273,487   $ 564,389   $ 3,423,596   $ 18,480,776  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014

 

U.S. Mainland

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial      Construction      Mortgage      Legacy      Consumer      Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

                 

Specific ALLL

   $ —        $ —        $ 273      $ —        $ 365      $ 638  

General ALLL

     9,648        1,187        2,189        2,944        13,978        29,946  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ALLL

$ 9,648   $ 1,187   $ 2,462   $ 2,944   $ 14,343   $ 30,584  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired loans

$ 250   $ —     $ 4,255   $ —     $ 1,973   $ 6,478  

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans

  1,759,214     92,436     1,048,130     80,818     479,261     3,459,859  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 1,759,464   $ 92,436   $ 1,052,385   $ 80,818   $ 481,234   $ 3,466,337  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014

 

Popular, Inc.

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial      Construction      Mortgage      Legacy      Leasing      Consumer      Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

                    

Specific ALLL non-covered loans

   $ 64,736      $ 363      $ 46,111      $ —        $ 770      $ 28,161      $ 140,141  

General ALLL non-covered loans

     146,501        6,307        77,211        2,944        6,361        140,254        379,578  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

ALLL - non-covered loans

  211,237     6,670     123,322     2,944     7,131     168,415     519,719  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Specific ALLL covered loans

  5     —       —       —       —       —       5  

General ALLL covered loans

  30,866     7,202     40,948     —       —       3,052     82,068  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

ALLL - covered loans

  30,871     7,202     40,948     —       —       3,052     82,073  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ALLL

$ 242,108   $ 13,872   $ 164,270   $ 2,944   $ 7,131   $ 171,467   $ 601,792  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired non-covered loans

$ 357,161   $ 13,268   $ 435,824   $ —     $ 3,023   $ 117,732   $ 927,008  

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

  7,777,106     238,552     6,067,062     80,818     561,366     3,752,539     18,477,443  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

  8,134,267     251,820     6,502,886     80,818     564,389     3,870,271     19,404,451  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired covered loans

  4,487     2,419     —       —       —       —       6,906  

Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

  1,610,294     67,917     822,986     —       —       34,559     2,535,756  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Covered loans held-in-portfolio

  1,614,781     70,336     822,986     —       —       34,559     2,542,662  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 9,749,048   $ 322,156   $ 7,325,872   $ 80,818   $ 564,389   $ 3,904,830   $ 21,947,113  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

224


                                                                                                                       

At December 31, 2013

 

Puerto Rico

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial      Construction      Mortgage      Leasing      Consumer      Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

                 

Specific ALLL non-covered loans

   $ 16,409      $ 177      $ 38,034      $ 1,053      $ 29,920      $ 85,593  

General ALLL non-covered loans

     111,741        4,918        92,296        9,569        122,658        341,182  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

ALLL - non-covered loans

  128,150     5,095     130,330     10,622     152,578     426,775  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Specific ALLL covered loans

  153     140     —       —       —       293  

General ALLL covered loans

  42,045     19,351     36,006     —       4,397     101,799  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

ALLL - covered loans

  42,198     19,491     36,006     —       4,397     102,092  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ALLL

$ 170,348   $ 24,586   $ 166,336   $ 10,622   $ 156,975   $ 528,867  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired non-covered loans

$ 245,380   $ 16,823   $ 399,347   $ 2,893   $ 125,342   $ 789,785  

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

  6,220,210     144,348     5,001,332     540,868     3,191,296     15,098,054  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

  6,465,590     161,171     5,400,679     543,761     3,316,638     15,887,839  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired covered loans

  20,945     —       —       —       —       20,945  

Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

  1,791,859     190,127     934,373     —       47,123     2,963,482  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Covered loans held-in-portfolio

  1,812,804     190,127     934,373     —       47,123     2,984,427  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 8,278,394   $ 351,298   $ 6,335,052   $ 543,761   $ 3,363,761   $ 18,872,266  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

At December 31, 2013

 

U.S. Mainland

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial      Construction      Mortgage      Legacy      Consumer      Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

                 

Specific ALLL

   $ —        $ —        $ 17,633      $ —        $ 280      $ 17,913  

General ALLL

     46,832        247        8,966        13,704        24,026        93,775  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ALLL

$ 46,832   $ 247   $ 26,599   $ 13,704   $ 24,306   $ 111,688  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired loans

$ 52,136   $ 5,663   $ 52,726   $ 6,045   $ 2,361   $ 118,931  

Loans held-in-portfolio, excluding impaired loans

  3,519,459     39,250     1,228,071     205,090     613,227     5,605,097  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 3,571,595   $ 44,913   $ 1,280,797   $ 211,135   $ 615,588   $ 5,724,028  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

225


At December 31, 2013

 

Popular, Inc.

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial      Construction      Mortgage      Legacy      Leasing      Consumer      Total  

Allowance for credit losses:

                    

Specific ALLL non-covered loans

   $ 16,409      $ 177      $ 55,667      $ —        $ 1,053      $ 30,200      $ 103,506  

General ALLL non-covered loans

     158,573        5,165        101,262        13,704        9,569        146,684        434,957  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

ALLL - non-covered loans

  174,982     5,342     156,929     13,704     10,622     176,884     538,463  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Specific ALLL covered loans

  153     140     —       —       —       —       293  

General ALLL covered loans

  42,045     19,351     36,006     —       —       4,397     101,799  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

ALLL - covered loans

  42,198     19,491     36,006     —       —       4,397     102,092  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ALLL

$ 217,180   $ 24,833   $ 192,935   $ 13,704   $ 10,622   $ 181,281   $ 640,555  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Impaired non-covered loans

$ 297,516   $ 22,486   $ 452,073   $ 6,045   $ 2,893   $ 127,703   $ 908,716  

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

  9,739,669     183,598     6,229,403     205,090     540,868     3,804,523     20,703,151  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-covered loans held-in-portfolio

  10,037,185     206,084     6,681,476     211,135     543,761     3,932,226     21,611,867  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired covered loans

  20,945     —       —       —       —       —       20,945  

Covered loans held-in-portfolio excluding impaired loans

  1,791,859     190,127     934,373     —       —       47,123     2,963,482  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Covered loans held-in-portfolio

  1,812,804     190,127     934,373     —       —       47,123     2,984,427  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 11,849,989   $ 396,211   $ 7,615,849   $ 211,135   $ 543,761   $ 3,979,349   $ 24,596,294  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Impaired loans

The following tables present loans individually evaluated for impairment at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

December 31, 2014

 

Puerto Rico

 
     Impaired Loans – With an      Impaired Loans                       
     Allowance      With No Allowance      Impaired Loans - Total  

(In thousands)

   Recorded
investment
     Unpaid
principal
balance
     Related
allowance
     Recorded
investment
     Unpaid
principal
balance
     Recorded
investment
     Unpaid
principal
balance
     Related
allowance
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

   $ 50,324      $ 53,154      $ 5,182      $ 7,929      $ 7,929      $ 58,253      $ 61,083      $ 5,182  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     114,163        127,855        16,770        14,897        16,110        129,060        143,965        16,770  

Commercial and industrial

     145,633        148,204        42,784        23,965        31,722        169,598        179,926        42,784  

Construction

     2,575        7,980        363        10,693        28,994        13,268        36,974        363  

Mortgage

     395,911        426,502        45,838        35,658        39,248        431,569        465,750        45,838  

Leasing

     3,023        3,023        770        —          —          3,023        3,023        770  

Consumer:

                       

Credit cards

     41,477        41,477        8,023        —          —          41,477        41,477        8,023  

Personal

     71,825        71,825        19,410        —          —          71,825        71,825        19,410  

Auto

     1,932        1,932        262        —          —          1,932        1,932        262  

Other

     525        525        101        —          —          525        525        101  

Covered loans

     2,419        7,500        5        4,487        4,487        6,906        11,987        5  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Puerto Rico

$ 829,807   $ 889,977   $ 139,508   $ 97,629   $ 128,490   $ 927,436   $ 1,018,467   $ 139,508  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

226


December 31, 2014

U.S. mainland [1]

     Impaired Loans – With an    Impaired Loans               
     Allowance    With No Allowance    Impaired Loans - Total

(In thousands)

   Recorded
investment
   Unpaid
principal
balance
   Related
allowance
   Recorded
investment
   Unpaid
principal
balance
   Recorded
investment
   Unpaid
principal
balance
   Related
allowance

Commercial and industrial

     $ —          $ —          $ —          $ 250        $ 250        $ 250        $ 250        $ —    

Mortgage

       3,049          3,443          273          1,206          2,306          4,255          5,749          273  

Consumer:

                                       

HELOCs

       1,095          1,095          362          791          791          1,886          1,886          362  

Other

       3          3          3          84          —            87          3          3  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total U.S. mainland

  $ 4,147     $ 4,541     $ 638     $ 2,331     $ 3,347     $ 6,478     $ 7,888     $ 638  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

[1]    Excludes impaired loans from discontinued operations.

       

December 31, 2014

Popular, Inc.

     Impaired Loans – With an    Impaired Loans               
     Allowance    With No Allowance    Impaired Loans - Total

(In thousands)

   Recorded
investment
   Unpaid
principal
balance
   Related
allowance
   Recorded
investment
   Unpaid
principal
balance
   Recorded
investment
   Unpaid
principal
balance
   Related
allowance

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     $ 50,324        $ 53,154        $ 5,182        $ 7,929        $ 7,929        $ 58,253        $ 61,083        $ 5,182  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

       114,163          127,855          16,770          14,897          16,110          129,060          143,965          16,770  

Commercial and industrial

       145,633          148,204          42,784          24,215          31,972          169,848          180,176          42,784  

Construction

       2,575          7,980          363          10,693          28,994          13,268          36,974          363  

Mortgage

       398,960          429,945          46,111          36,864          41,554          435,824          471,499          46,111  

Leasing

       3,023          3,023          770          —            —            3,023          3,023          770  

Consumer:

                                       

Credit cards

       41,477          41,477          8,023          —            —            41,477          41,477          8,023  

HELOCs

       1,095          1,095          362          791          791          1,886          1,886          362  

Personal

       71,825          71,825          19,410          —            —            71,825          71,825          19,410  

Auto

       1,932          1,932          262          —            —            1,932          1,932          262  

Other

       528          528          104          84          —            612          528          104  

Covered loans

       2,419          7,500          5          4,487          4,487          6,906          11,987          5  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total Popular, Inc.

  $ 833,954     $ 894,518     $ 140,146     $ 99,960     $ 131,837     $ 933,914     $ 1,026,355     $ 140,146  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

Puerto Rico

     Impaired Loans – With an    Impaired Loans               
     Allowance    With No Allowance    Impaired Loans - Total

(In thousands)

   Recorded
investment
   Unpaid
principal
balance
   Related
allowance
   Recorded
investment
   Unpaid
principal
balance
   Recorded
investment
   Unpaid
principal
balance
   Related
allowance

Commercial multi-family

     $ —          $ —          $ —          $ 3,405        $ 6,942        $ 3,405        $ 6,942        $ —    

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

       19,120          19,407          2,368          47,245          55,397          66,365          74,804          2,368  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

       55,826          74,420          6,473          33,749          47,545          89,575          121,965          6,473  

Commercial and industrial

       30,370          33,152          7,568          55,665          68,141          86,035          101,293          7,568  

Construction

       2,324          9,047          177          14,499          36,951          16,823          45,998          177  

Mortgage

       358,437          376,393          38,034          40,910          45,181          399,347          421,574          38,034  

Leasing

       2,893          2,893          1,053          —            —            2,893          2,893          1,053  

Consumer:

                                       

Credit cards

       45,015          45,015          8,344          —            —            45,015          45,015          8,344  

Personal

       78,475          78,475          21,313          —            —            78,475          78,475          21,313  

Auto

       1,354          1,354          171          —            —            1,354          1,354          171  

Other

       498          498          92          —            —            498          498          92  

Covered loans

       12,837          17,538          293          8,108          10,063          20,945          27,601          293  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Total Puerto Rico

  $ 607,149     $ 658,192     $ 85,886     $ 203,581     $ 270,220     $ 810,730     $ 928,412     $ 85,886  
    

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

 

227


                                                                                                               

December 31, 2013

 

U.S. mainland

 
     Impaired Loans – With an      Impaired Loans                       
     Allowance      With No Allowance      Impaired Loans - Total  

(In thousands)

   Recorded
investment
     Unpaid
principal
balance
     Related
allowance
     Recorded
investment
     Unpaid
principal
balance
     Recorded
investment
     Unpaid
principal
balance
     Related
allowance
 

Commercial multi-family

   $ —        $ —        $ —        $ 7,668      $ 10,870      $ 7,668      $ 10,870      $ —    

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     —          —          —          27,016        37,393        27,016        37,393        —    

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     —          —          —          15,624        19,910        15,624        19,910        —    

Commercial and industrial

     —          —          —          1,828        1,828        1,828        1,828        —    

Construction

     —          —          —          5,663        5,663        5,663        5,663        —    

Mortgage

     46,192        50,570        17,633        6,534        8,513        52,726        59,083        17,633  

Legacy

     —          —          —          6,045        8,715        6,045        8,715        —    

Consumer:

                       

HELOCs

     —          —          —          198        198        198        198        —    

Auto

     —          —          —          88        88        88        88        —    

Other

     2,075        2,075        280        —          —          2,075        2,075        280  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total U.S. mainland

$ 48,267   $ 52,645   $ 17,913   $ 70,664   $ 93,178   $ 118,931   $ 145,823   $ 17,913  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                               

December 31, 2013

 

Popular, Inc.

 
     Impaired Loans – With an      Impaired Loans                       
     Allowance      With No Allowance      Impaired Loans - Total  

(In thousands)

   Recorded
investment
     Unpaid
principal
balance
     Related
allowance
     Recorded
investment
     Unpaid
principal
balance
     Recorded
investment
     Unpaid
principal
balance
     Related
allowance
 

Commercial multi-family

   $ —        $ —        $ —        $ 11,073      $ 17,812      $ 11,073      $ 17,812      $ —    

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     19,120        19,407        2,368        74,261        92,790        93,381        112,197        2,368  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     55,826        74,420        6,473        49,373        67,455        105,199        141,875        6,473  

Commercial and industrial

     30,370        33,152        7,568        57,493        69,969        87,863        103,121        7,568  

Construction

     2,324        9,047        177        20,162        42,614        22,486        51,661        177  

Mortgage

     404,629        426,963        55,667        47,444        53,694        452,073        480,657        55,667  

Legacy

     —          —          —          6,045        8,715        6,045        8,715        —    

Leasing

     2,893        2,893        1,053        —          —          2,893        2,893        1,053  

Consumer:

                       

Credit cards

     45,015        45,015        8,344        —          —          45,015        45,015        8,344  

HELOCs

     —          —          —          198        198        198        198        —    

Personal

     78,475        78,475        21,313        —          —          78,475        78,475        21,313  

Auto

     1,354        1,354        171        88        88        1,442        1,442        171  

Other

     2,573        2,573        372        —          —          2,573        2,573        372  

Covered loans

     12,837        17,538        293        8,108        10,063        20,945        27,601        293  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 655,416   $ 710,837   $ 103,799   $ 274,245   $ 363,398   $ 929,661   $ 1,074,235   $ 103,799  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following tables present the average recorded investment and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 
     Puerto Rico      U.S. Mainland [1]      Popular, Inc.  

(In thousands)

   Average
recorded
investment
     Interest
income
recognized
     Average
recorded
investment
     Interest
income
recognized
     Average
recorded
investment
     Interest
income
recognized
 

Commercial multi-family

   $ 1,539      $ —        $ 2,657      $ —        $ 4,196      $ —    

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     70,154        2,719        9,264        —          79,418        2,719  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     114,893        3,994        5,778        —          120,671        3,994  

Commercial and industrial

     130,940        7,852        955        —          131,895        7,852  

Construction

     18,418        —          1,133        —          19,551        —    

Mortgage

     415,188        19,319        33,686        1,187        448,874        20,506  

Legacy

     —          —          2,920        —          2,920        —    

Leasing

     2,747        —          —          —          2,747        —    

Consumer:

                 

Credit cards

     42,345        —          —          —          42,345        —    

HELOCs

     —          —          1,768        —          1,768        —    

Personal

     74,593        —          —          —          74,593        —    

Auto

     1,884        —          52        —          1,936        —    

Other

     748        —          452        —          1,200        —    

Covered loans

     8,763        469        —          —          8,763        469  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 882,212   $ 34,353   $ 58,665   $ 1,187   $ 940,877   $ 35,540  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Excludes impaired loans from discontinued operations.

 

228


For the year ended December 31, 2013

 
     Puerto Rico      U.S. Mainland      Popular, Inc.  

(In thousands)

   Average
recorded
investment
     Interest
income
recognized
     Average
recorded
investment
     Interest
income
recognized
     Average
recorded
investment
     Interest
income
recognized
 

Commercial multi-family

   $ 8,356      $ 259      $ 7,493      $ 120      $ 15,849      $ 379  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     58,773        2,225        36,688        223        95,461        2,448  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     125,091        2,956        19,024        150        144,115        3,106  

Commercial and industrial

     102,408        4,206        2,328        15        104,736        4,221  

Construction

     31,491        —          5,821        —          37,312        —    

Mortgage

     461,534        25,610        53,137        1,955        514,671        27,565  

Legacy

     —          —          12,957        —          12,957        —    

Leasing

     3,822        —          —          —          3,822        —    

Consumer:

                 

Credit cards

     40,044        —          —          —          40,044        —    

HELOCs

     —          —          199        —          199        —    

Personal

     82,687        —          —          —          82,687        —    

Auto

     1,003        —          89        —          1,092        —    

Other

     417        —          2,260        —          2,677        —    

Covered loans

     42,791        1,245        —          —          42,791        1,245  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 958,417   $ 36,501   $ 139,996   $ 2,463   $ 1,098,413   $ 38,964  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Modifications

Troubled debt restructurings related to non-covered loan portfolios amounted to $ 1.1 billion at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $ 1.0 billion). The amount of outstanding commitments to lend additional funds to debtors owing receivables whose terms have been modified in troubled debt restructurings amounted $5 million related to the commercial loan portfolio and $1 million related to the construction loan portfolio at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $3 million and $0, respectively).

A modification of a loan constitutes a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the modification constitutes a concession.

Commercial and industrial loans modified in a TDR often involve temporary interest-only payments, term extensions, and converting evergreen revolving credit lines to long-term loans. Commercial real estate (“CRE”), which includes multifamily, owner-occupied and non-owner occupied CRE, and construction loans modified in a TDR often involve reducing the interest rate for a limited period of time or the remaining term of the loan, extending the maturity date at an interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk, or reductions in the payment plan. Construction loans modified in a TDR may also involve extending the interest-only payment period.

Residential mortgage loans modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where monthly payments are lowered to accommodate the borrowers’ financial needs for a period of time, normally five years to ten years. After the lowered monthly payment period ends, the borrower reverts back to paying principal and interest per the original terms with the maturity date adjusted accordingly.

Home equity loans modifications are made infrequently and are not offered if the Corporation also holds the first mortgage. Home equity loans modifications are uniquely designed to meet the specific needs of each borrower. Automobile loans modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where the Corporation has lowered monthly payments by extending the term. Credit cards modified in a TDR are primarily comprised of loans where monthly payments are lowered to accommodate the borrowers’ financial needs for a period of time, normally up to 24 months.

As part of its NPL reduction strategy and in order to expedite the resolution of delinquent construction and commercial loans, commencing in 2012, the Corporation routinely enters into liquidation agreements with borrowers and guarantors through the regular legal process, bankruptcy procedures and in certain occasions, out of court transactions. These liquidation agreements, in general, contemplate the following conditions: (1) consent to judgment by the borrowers and guarantors; (2) acknowledgement by the borrower of the debt, its liquidity and maturity; and (3) acknowledgment of the default in payments. The contractual interest rate is not reduced and continues to accrue during the term of the agreement. At the end of the period, the borrower is obligated to remit all amounts due or be subject to the Corporation’s exercise of its foreclosure rights and further collection efforts. Likewise, the borrower’s failure to make stipulated payments will grant the Corporation the ability to exercise its foreclosure rights. This strategy tends to expedite the foreclosure process, resulting in a more effective and efficient collection process. Although in general, these

 

229


liquidation agreements do not contemplate the forgiveness of principal or interest as debtor is required to cover all outstanding amounts when the agreement becomes due, it could be construed that the Corporation has granted a concession by temporarily accepting a payment schedule that is different from the contractual payment schedule. Accordingly, loans under these program agreements are considered TDRs.

Loans modified in a TDR that are not accounted pursuant to ASC Subtopic 310-30 are typically already in non-accrual status at the time of the modification and partial charge-offs have in some cases already been taken against the outstanding loan balance. The TDR loan continues in non-accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated a willingness and ability to make the restructured loan payments (generally at least six months of sustained performance after the modification (or one year for loans providing for quarterly or semi-annual payments)) and management has concluded that it is probable that the borrower would not be in payment default in the foreseeable future.

Loans modified in a TDR may have the financial effect to the Corporation of increasing the specific allowance for loan losses associated with the loan. Consumer and residential mortgage loans modified under the Corporation’s loss mitigation programs that are determined to be TDRs are individually evaluated for impairment based on an analysis of discounted cash flows.

For consumer and mortgage loans that are modified with regard to payment terms and which constitute TDRs, the discounted cash flow value method is used as the impairment valuation is more appropriately calculated based on the ongoing cash flow from the individuals rather than the liquidation of the asset. The computations give consideration to probability of defaults and loss-given-foreclosure on the related estimated cash flows.

Commercial and construction loans that have been modified as part of loss mitigation efforts are evaluated individually for impairment. The vast majority of the Corporation’s modified commercial loans are measured for impairment using the estimated fair value of the collateral, as these are normally considered as collateral dependent loans. The Corporation may also measure commercial loans at their estimated realizable values determined by discounting the expected future cash flows. Construction loans that have been modified are also accounted for as collateral dependent loans. The Corporation determines the fair value measurement dependent upon its exit strategy for the particular asset(s) acquired in foreclosure.

The following tables present the non-covered and covered loans classified as TDRs according to their accruing status at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

     Popular, Inc.  
     Non-Covered Loans  
     December 31, 2014 [1]      December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Accruing      Non-Accruing      Total      Accruing      Non-Accruing      Total  

Commercial

   $ 153,380      $ 150,069      $ 303,449      $ 109,462      $ 80,140      $ 189,602  

Construction

     453        5,488        5,941        425        10,865        11,290  

Legacy

     —          —          —          —          949        949  

Mortgage

     556,346        116,465        672,811        535,357        82,786        618,143  

Leases

     775        2,248        3,023        270        2,623        2,893  

Consumer

     107,530        14,848        122,378        116,719        10,741        127,460  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 818,484   $ 289,118   $ 1,107,602   $ 762,233   $ 188,104   $ 950,337  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Excludes TDRs from discontinued operations.

 

230


     Popular, Inc.  
     Covered Loans  
     December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Accruing      Non-Accruing      Total      Accruing      Non-Accruing      Total  

Commercial

   $ 1,689      $ 3,257      $ 4,946      $ 7,389      $ 10,017      $ 17,406  

Construction

     —          2,419        2,419        —          3,464        3,464  

Mortgage

     3,629        3,990        7,619        146        189        335  

Consumer

     26        5        31        221        22        243  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 5,344   $ 9,671   $ 15,015   $ 7,756   $ 13,692   $ 21,448  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following tables present the loan count by type of modification for those loans modified in a TDR during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

Puerto Rico

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 
     Reduction in
interest rate
     Extension of
maturity date
     Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
     Other  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     5        8        —          —    

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     25        12        —          —    

Commercial and industrial

     37        43        —          —    

Construction

     —          4        —          —    

Mortgage

     52        61        413        142  

Leasing

     —          15        48        —    

Consumer:

           

Credit cards

     1,070        —          —          653  

Personal

     955        71        —          6  

Auto

     —          13        5        —    

Other

     103        —          —          2  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  2,247     227     466     803  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

U.S. mainland

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 
     Reduction in
interest rate
     Extension of
maturity date
     Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
     Other  

Mortgage

     —          —          18        —    

Consumer:

           

HELOCs

     5        —          —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  5     —       18     —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

231


Popular, Inc.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 
     Reduction in
interest rate
     Extension of
maturity date
     Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
     Other  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     5        8        —          —    

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     25        12        —          —    

Commercial and industrial

     37        43        —          —    

Construction

     —          4        —          —    

Mortgage

     52        61        431        142  

Leasing

     —          15        48        —    

Consumer:

           

Credit cards

     1,070        —          —          653  

HELOCs

     5        —          —          —    

Personal

     955        71        —          6  

Auto

     —          13        5        —    

Other

     103        —          —          2  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  2,252     227     484     803  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Puerto Rico

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

 
     Reduction in
interest rate
     Extension of
maturity date
     Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
     Other  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     5        5        —          —    

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     6        4        —          45  

Commercial and industrial

     23        13        —          10  

Mortgage

     22        42        341        17  

Leasing

     —          22        23        —    

Consumer:

           

Credit cards

     1,107        —          —          989  

Personal

     923        22        —          6  

Auto

     —          11        —          —    

Other

     71        —          —          4  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  2,157     119     364     1,071  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

U.S. mainland

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

 
     Reduction in
interest rate
     Extension of
maturity date
     Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension
of maturity date
     Other  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     —          2        4        —    

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     —          1        1        —    

Commercial and industrial

     —          1        —          —    

Mortgage

     1        1        26        —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  1     5     31     —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

232


Popular, Inc.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

 
     Reduction in
interest rate
     Extension of
maturity date
     Combination of
reduction in interest
rate and extension of
maturity date
     Other  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     5        7        4        —    

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     6        5        1        45  

Commercial and industrial

     23        14        —          10  

Mortgage

     23        43        367        17  

Leasing

     —          22        23        —    

Consumer:

           

Credit cards

     1,107        —          —          989  

Personal

     923        22        —          6  

Auto

     —          11        —          —    

Other

     71        —          —          4  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  2,158     124     395     1,071  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following tables present by class, quantitative information related to loans modified as TDRs during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

Puerto Rico

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Loan count      Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     13      $ 17,565      $ 17,645      $ (865

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     37        48,403        47,754        2,002  

Commercial and industrial

     80        130,818        129,561        6,728  

Construction

     4        11,358        11,485        (570

Mortgage

     668        98,771        98,031        4,292  

Leasing

     63        1,628        1,632        361  

Consumer:

           

Credit cards

     1,723        14,207        16,193        2,584  

Personal

     1,032        17,814        17,881        3,935  

Auto

     18        278        289        16  

Other

     105        325        319        57  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  3,743   $ 341,167   $ 340,790   $ 18,540  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

U.S. mainland

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Loan count      Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification
 

Mortgage

     18      $ 2,342      $ 2,603      $ 364  

Consumer:

           

HELOCs

     5        251        250        67  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  23   $ 2,593   $ 2,853   $ 431  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Excludes TDRs from discontinued operations.

 

233


Popular, Inc.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2014

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Loan count      Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     13      $ 17,565      $ 17,645      $ (865

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     37        48,403        47,754        2,002  

Commercial and industrial

     80        130,818        129,561        6,728  

Construction

     4        11,358        11,485        (570

Mortgage

     686        101,113        100,634        4,656  

Leasing

     63        1,628        1,632        361  

Consumer:

           

Credit cards

     1,723        14,207        16,193        2,584  

HELOCs

     5        251        250        67  

Personal

     1,032        17,814        17,881        3,935  

Auto

     18        278        289        16  

Other

     105        325        319        57  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  3,766   $ 343,760   $ 343,643   $ 18,971  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Excludes TDRs from discontinued operations.

 

Puerto Rico

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Loan count      Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     10      $ 10,729      $ 9,194      $ (7

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     55        29,975        25,629        (1,047

Commercial and industrial

     46        15,947        14,855        (253

Mortgage

     422        72,899        76,839        8,869  

Leasing

     45        928        900        271  

Consumer:

           

Credit cards

     2,096        16,622        19,810        2,380  

Personal

     951        15,474        15,507        3,864  

Auto

     11        122        199        15  

Other

     75        267        264        36  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  3,711   $ 162,963   $ 163,197   $ 14,128  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

U.S. mainland

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Loan count      Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     6      $ 4,798      $ 4,552      $ (65

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     2        1,263        836        (144

Commercial and industrial

     1        2,125        1,060        (216

Mortgage

     28        3,240        3,395        1,099  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  37   $ 11,426   $ 9,843   $ 674  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

234


Popular, Inc.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Loan count      Pre-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Post-modification
outstanding recorded
investment
     Increase (decrease) in the
allowance for loan losses as
a result of modification
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     16      $ 15,527      $ 13,746      $ (72

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     57        31,238        26,465        (1,191

Commercial and industrial

     47        18,072        15,915        (469

Mortgage

     450        76,139        80,234        9,968  

Leasing

     45        928        900        271  

Consumer:

           

Credit cards

     2,096        16,622        19,810        2,380  

Personal

     951        15,474        15,507        3,864  

Auto

     11        122        199        15  

Other

     75        267        264        36  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  3,748   $ 174,389   $ 173,040   $ 14,802  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, six loans with an aggregate unpaid principal balance of $10.1 million and six loans of $165 million, respectively, were restructured into multiple notes (“Note A / B split”). The Corporation recorded $2.1 million charge-offs as part of those loan restructurings during the year ended December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $26.6 million). The restructuring of those loans was made after analyzing the borrowers’ capacity to repay the debt, collateral and ability to perform under the modified terms. The recorded investment on those commercial TDRs amounted to approximately $2.9 million at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $130 million) with a related allowance for loan losses amounting to approximately $166 thousand (December 31, 2013 - $64 million).

The following tables present by class, TDRs that were subject to payment default and that had been modified as a TDR during the twelve months preceding the default date. Payment default is defined as a restructured loan becoming 90 days past due after being modified, foreclosed or charged-off, whichever occurs first. The recorded investment at December 31, 2014 is inclusive of all partial paydowns and charge-offs since the modification date. Loans modified as a TDR that were fully paid down, charged-off or foreclosed upon by period end are not reported.

 

Puerto Rico

 

Defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2014

 

(Dollars In thousands)

   Loan count      Recorded investment
as of first default date
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     3      $ 433  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     5        1,191  

Commercial and industrial

     5        609  

Construction

     1        952  

Mortgage

     125        22,819  

Leasing

     8        72  

Consumer:

     

Credit cards

     465        4,176  

Personal

     101        1,331  

Auto

     14        255  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total [1]

  727   $ 31,838  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Excludes loans for which the Corporation has entered into liquidation agreements with borrowers and guarantors and is accepting payments which differ from the contractual payment schedule. The Corporation considers these as defaulted loans and does not intent to return them to accrual status.

 

235


U.S. mainland

 

Defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2014

 

(Dollars In thousands)

   Loan count      Recorded investment
as of first default date
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     1      $ 907  

Mortgage

     1        110  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  2   $ 1,017  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Popular, Inc.

 

Defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2014

 

(Dollars In thousands)

   Loan count      Recorded investment
as of first default date
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     4      $ 1,340  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     5        1,191  

Commercial and industrial

     5        609  

Construction

     1        952  

Mortgage

     126        22,929  

Leasing

     8        72  

Consumer:

     

Credit cards

     465        4,176  

Personal

     101        1,331  

Auto

     14        255  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  729   $ 32,855  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Puerto Rico

 

Defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars In thousands)

   Loan count      Recorded investment
as of first default date
 

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     5      $ 5,733  

Commercial and industrial

     6        1,838  

Mortgage

     208        32,734  

Leasing

     18        279  

Consumer:

     

Credit cards

     623        5,955  

Personal

     134        1,862  

Auto

     6        145  

Other

     2        21  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total [1]

  1,002   $ 48,567  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Exclude loans for which the Corporation has entered into liquidation agreements with borrowers and guarantors and is accepting payments which differ from the contractual payment schedule. The Corporation considers these as defaulted loans and does not intent to return them to accrual status.

 

U.S. mainland

 

Defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars In thousands)

   Loan count      Recorded investment
as of first default date
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     3      $ 2,554  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  3   $ 2,554  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

236


Popular, Inc.

 

Defaulted during the year ended December 31, 2013

 

(Dollars In thousands)

   Loan count      Recorded investment
as of first default date
 

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     3      $ 2,554  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     5        5,733  

Commercial and industrial

     6        1,838  

Mortgage

     208        32,734  

Leasing

     18        279  

Consumer:

     

Credit cards

     623        5,955  

Personal

     134        1,862  

Auto

     6        145  

Other

     2        21  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  1,005   $ 51,121  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Commercial, consumer and mortgage loans modified in a TDR are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default. If loans modified in a TDR subsequently default, the Corporation evaluates the loan for possible further impairment. The allowance for loan losses may be increased or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan.

Credit Quality

The Corporation has defined a dual risk rating system to assign a rating to all credit exposures, particularly for the commercial and construction loan portfolios. Risk ratings in the aggregate provide the Corporation’s management the asset quality profile for the loan portfolio. The dual risk rating system provides for the assignment of ratings at the obligor level based on the financial condition of the borrower, and at the credit facility level based on the collateral supporting the transaction. The Corporation’s consumer and mortgage loans are not subject to the dual risk rating system. Consumer and mortgage loans are classified substandard or loss based on their delinquency status. All other consumer and mortgage loans that are not classified as substandard or loss would be considered “unrated”.

The Corporation’s obligor risk rating scales range from rating 1 (Excellent) to rating 14 (Loss). The obligor risk rating reflects the risk of payment default of a borrower in the ordinary course of business.

Pass Credit Classifications:

Pass (Scales 1 through 8) – Loans classified as pass have a well defined primary source of repayment very likely to be sufficient, with no apparent risk, strong financial position, minimal operating risk, profitability, liquidity and capitalization better than industry standards.

Watch (Scale 9) – Loans classified as watch have acceptable business credit, but borrower’s operations, cash flow or financial condition evidence more than average risk, requires above average levels of supervision and attention from Loan Officers.

Special Mention (Scale 10) - Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the Corporation’s credit position at some future date.

Adversely Classified Classifications:

Substandard (Scales 11 and 12) - Loans classified as substandard are deemed to be inadequately protected by the current net worth and payment capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified as such have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful (Scale 13) - Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make the collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

Loss (Scale 14) - Uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as a bankable asset is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this asset even though partial recovery may be effected in the future.

 

237


Risk ratings scales 10 through 14 conform to regulatory ratings. The assignment of the obligor risk rating is based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debts such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors.

The Corporation periodically reviews loans classified as watch or worse, to evaluate if they are properly classified, and to determine impairment, if any. The frequency of these reviews will depend on the amount of the aggregate outstanding debt, and the risk rating classification of the obligor. In addition, during the renewal process of applicable credit facilities, the Corporation evaluates the corresponding loan grades.

Loans classified as pass credits are excluded from the scope of the review process described above until: (a) they become past due; (b) management becomes aware of deterioration in the creditworthiness of the borrower; or (c) the customer contacts the Corporation for a modification. In these circumstances, the credit facilities are specifically evaluated to assign the appropriate risk rating classification.

The Corporation has a Credit Process Review Group within the Corporate Credit Risk Management Division (“CCRMD”), which performs annual comprehensive credit process reviews of several middle markets, construction, asset-based and corporate banking lending groups in BPPR. This group evaluates the credit risk profile of each originating unit along with each unit’s credit administration effectiveness, including the assessment of the risk rating representative of the current credit quality of the loans, and the evaluation of collateral documentation. The monitoring performed by this group contributes to assess compliance with credit policies and underwriting standards, determine the current level of credit risk, evaluate the effectiveness of the credit management process and identify control deficiencies that may arise in the credit-granting process. Based on its findings, the Credit Process Review Group recommends corrective actions, if necessary, that help in maintaining a sound credit process. CCRMD has contracted an outside loan review firm to perform the credit process reviews for the portfolios of commercial and construction loans in the U.S. mainland operations. The CCRMD participates in defining the review plan with the outside loan review firm and actively participates in the discussions of the results of the loan reviews with the business units. The CCRMD may periodically review the work performed by the outside loan review firm. CCRMD reports the results of the credit process reviews to the Risk Management Committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

The following table presents the outstanding balance, net of unearned income, of non-covered loans held-in-portfolio based on the Corporation’s assignment of obligor risk ratings as defined at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

December 31, 2014

 

(In thousands)

   Watch      Special
Mention
     Substandard      Doubtful      Loss      Sub-total      Pass/
Unrated
     Total  

Puerto Rico [1]

                       

Commercial multi-family

   $ 2,306      $ 5,021      $ 3,186      $ —        $ —        $ 10,513      $ 69,564      $ 80,077  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     171,771        144,104        169,900        —          —          485,775        1,527,804        2,013,579  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     212,236        144,536        306,014        3,595        —          666,381        806,981        1,473,362  

Commercial and industrial

     421,332        367,834        272,880        849        255        1,063,150        1,744,635        2,807,785  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

  807,645     661,495     751,980     4,444     255     2,225,819     4,148,984     6,374,803  

Construction

  4,612     6,204     16,908     —       —       27,724     131,660     159,384  

Mortgage

  —       —       218,680     —       —       218,680     5,231,821     5,450,501  

Leasing

  —       —       3,102     —       —       3,102     561,287     564,389  

Consumer:

Credit cards

  —       —       21,070     —       —       21,070     1,119,094     1,140,164  

HELOCs

  —       —       8,186     —       7     8,193     5,207     13,400  

Personal

  —       —       8,380     —       77     8,457     1,254,076     1,262,533  

Auto

  —       —       11,348     —       40     11,388     755,908     767,296  

Other

  —       —       2,130     —       1,735     3,865     201,779     205,644  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Consumer

  —       —       51,114     —       1,859     52,973     3,336,064     3,389,037  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Puerto Rico

$ 812,257   $ 667,699   $ 1,041,784   $ 4,444   $ 2,114   $ 2,528,298   $ 13,409,816   $ 15,938,114  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

238


U.S. mainland [2]

Commercial multi-family

$ 11,283   $ 6,818   $ 13,653   $ —     $ —     $ 31,754   $ 375,449   $ 407,203  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

  17,424     8,745     13,446     —       —       39,615     472,952     512,567  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

  24,284     4,707     4,672     —       —       33,663     160,242     193,905  

Commercial and industrial

  5,357     2,548     7,988     —       —       15,893     629,896     645,789  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

  58,348     22,818     39,759     —       —       120,925     1,638,539     1,759,464  

Construction

  —       —       —       —       —       —       92,436     92,436  

Mortgage

  —       —       23,100     —       —       23,100     1,029,285     1,052,385  

Legacy

  7,902     2,491     9,204     —       —       19,597     61,221     80,818  

Consumer:

Credit cards

  —       —       —       —       —       —       15,065     15,065  

HELOCs

  —       —       2,457     —       1,632     4,089     348,673     352,762  

Personal

  —       —       571     —       835     1,406     111,513     112,919  

Auto

  —       —       —       —       —       —       73     73  

Other

  —       —       7     —       —       7     408     415  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Consumer

  —       —       3,035     —       2,467     5,502     475,732     481,234  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total U.S. mainland

$ 66,250   $ 25,309   $ 75,098   $ —     $ 2,467   $ 169,124   $ 3,297,213   $ 3,466,337  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Popular, Inc.

Commercial multi-family

$ 13,589   $ 11,839   $ 16,839   $ —     $ —     $ 42,267   $ 445,013   $ 487,280  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

  189,195     152,849     183,346     —       —       525,390     2,000,756     2,526,146  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

  236,520     149,243     310,686     3,595     —       700,044     967,223     1,667,267  

Commercial and industrial

  426,689     370,382     280,868     849     255     1,079,043     2,374,531     3,453,574  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

  865,993     684,313     791,739     4,444     255     2,346,744     5,787,523     8,134,267  

Construction

  4,612     6,204     16,908     —       —       27,724     224,096     251,820  

Mortgage

  —       —       241,780     —       —       241,780     6,261,106     6,502,886  

Legacy

  7,902     2,491     9,204     —       —       19,597     61,221     80,818  

Leasing

  —       —       3,102     —       —       3,102     561,287     564,389  

Consumer:

Credit cards

  —       —       21,070     —       —       21,070     1,134,159     1,155,229  

HELOCs

  —       —       10,643     —       1,639     12,282     353,880     366,162  

Personal

  —       —       8,951     —       912     9,863     1,365,589     1,375,452  

Auto

  —       —       11,348     —       40     11,388     755,981     767,369  

Other

  —       —       2,137     —       1,735     3,872     202,187     206,059  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Consumer

  —       —       54,149     —       4,326     58,475     3,811,796     3,870,271  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 878,507   $ 693,008   $ 1,116,882   $ 4,444   $ 4,581   $ 2,697,422   $ 16,707,029   $ 19,404,451  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents the weighted average obligor risk rating at December 31, 2014 for those classifications that consider a range of rating scales.

 

Weighted average obligor risk rating    (Scales 11 and 12)      (Scales 1 through 8)  
Puerto Rico: [1]    Substandard      Pass  

Commercial multi-family

     11.69         5.63   

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     11.20         6.83   

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     11.28         6.96   

Commercial and industrial

     11.48         6.89   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

  11.33      6.87   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Construction

  11.82      7.43   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
U.S. mainland: [2]    Substandard      Pass  

Commercial multi-family

     11.00         7.24   

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     11.00         6.83   

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     11.17         7.04   

Commercial and industrial

     11.09         6.29   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

  11.04      6.74   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Construction

  —        7.76   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Legacy

  11.11      7.70   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.
[2] Excludes discontinued operations.

 

 

239


December 31, 2013

 

(In thousands)

   Watch      Special
Mention
     Substandard      Doubtful      Loss      Sub-total      Pass/
Unrated
     Total  

Puerto Rico [1]

                       

Commercial multi-family

   $ 2,477      $ 4,453      $ 2,343      $ —        $ —        $ 9,273      $ 73,130      $ 82,403  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     230,847        156,189        115,435        —          112        502,583        1,361,635        1,864,218  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     231,705        134,577        305,565        —          —          671,847        934,656        1,606,503  

Commercial and industrial

     727,647        192,404        214,531        68        446        1,135,096        1,777,370        2,912,466  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

  1,192,676     487,623     637,874     68     558     2,318,799     4,146,791     6,465,590  

Construction

  6,895     1,788     25,722     2,250     —       36,655     124,516     161,171  

Mortgage

  —       —       169,239     —       —       169,239     5,231,440     5,400,679  

Leasing

  —       —       3,495     —       —       3,495     540,266     543,761  

Consumer:

Credit cards

  —       —       21,044     —       —       21,044     1,148,577     1,169,621  

HELOCs

  —       —       665     —       2,426     3,091     12,087     15,178  

Personal

  —       —       7,483     —       141     7,624     1,206,260     1,213,884  

Auto

  —       —       10,407     —       155     10,562     688,929     699,491  

Other

  —       —       2,019     —       3,531     5,550     212,914     218,464  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Consumer

  —       —       41,618     —       6,253     47,871     3,268,767     3,316,638  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Puerto Rico

$ 1,199,571   $ 489,411   $ 877,948   $ 2,318   $ 6,811   $ 2,576,059   $ 13,311,780   $ 15,887,839  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

U.S. mainland

Commercial multi-family

$ 73,481   $ 11,459   $ 62,346   $ —     $ —     $ 147,286   $ 946,248   $ 1,093,534  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

  75,094     29,442     160,001     —       —       264,537     841,750     1,106,287  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

  56,515     15,845     75,508     —       —       147,868     412,174     560,042  

Commercial and industrial

  11,657     11,822     46,307     —       —       69,786     741,945     811,731  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

  216,747     68,568     344,162     —       —       629,477     2,942,117     3,571,594  

Construction

  —       —       20,885     —       —       20,885     24,028     44,913  

Mortgage

  —       —       26,292     —       —       26,292     1,254,505     1,280,797  

Legacy

  14,948     11,593     42,622     —       —       69,163     141,972     211,135  

Consumer:

Credit cards

  —       —       486     —       —       486     15,165     15,651  

HELOCs

  —       —       3,317     —       5,315     8,632     454,401     463,033  

Personal

  —       —       1,005     —       569     1,574     133,661     135,235  

Auto

  —       —       —       —       2     2     487     489  

Other

  —       —       20     —       1     21     1,159     1,180  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Consumer

  —       —       4,828     —       5,887     10,715     604,873     615,588  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total U.S. mainland

$ 231,695   $ 80,161   $ 438,789   $ —     $ 5,887   $ 756,532   $ 4,967,495   $ 5,724,027  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Popular, Inc.

Commercial multi-family

$ 75,958   $ 15,912   $ 64,689   $ —     $ —     $ 156,559   $ 1,019,378   $ 1,175,937  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

  305,941     185,631     275,436     —       112     767,120     2,203,385     2,970,505  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

  288,220     150,422     381,073     —       —       819,715     1,346,830     2,166,545  

Commercial and industrial

  739,304     204,226     260,838     68     446     1,204,882     2,519,315     3,724,197  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

  1,409,423     556,191     982,036     68     558     2,948,276     7,088,908     10,037,184  

Construction

  6,895     1,788     46,607     2,250     —       57,540     148,544     206,084  

Mortgage

  —       —       195,531     —       —       195,531     6,485,945     6,681,476  

Legacy

  14,948     11,593     42,622     —       —       69,163     141,972     211,135  

Leasing

  —       —       3,495     —       —       3,495     540,266     543,761  

Consumer:

Credit cards

  —       —       21,530     —       —       21,530     1,163,742     1,185,272  

HELOCs

  —       —       3,982     —       7,741     11,723     466,488     478,211  

Personal

  —       —       8,488     —       710     9,198     1,339,921     1,349,119  

Auto

  —       —       10,407     —       157     10,564     689,416     699,980  

Other

  —       —       2,039     —       3,532     5,571     214,073     219,644  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Consumer

  —       —       46,446     —       12,140     58,586     3,873,640     3,932,226  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 1,431,266   $ 569,572   $ 1,316,737   $ 2,318   $ 12,698   $ 3,332,591   $ 18,279,275   $ 21,611,866  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

240


The following table presents the weighted average obligor risk rating at December 31, 2013 for those classifications that consider a range of rating scales.

 

Weighted average obligor risk rating    (Scales 11 and 12)      (Scales 1 through 8)  
Puerto Rico: [1]    Substandard      Pass  

Commercial multi-family

     11.33        5.31  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     11.38        6.73  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     11.31        6.89  

Commercial and industrial

     11.34        6.63  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

  11.33     6.71  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Construction

  11.63     7.86  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
U.S. mainland:    Substandard      Pass  

Commercial multi-family

     11.34        7.08  

Commercial real estate non-owner occupied

     11.27        6.89  

Commercial real estate owner occupied

     11.31        7.04  

Commercial and industrial

     11.09        6.53  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Commercial

  11.27     6.89  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Construction

  11.27     7.64  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Legacy

  11.24     7.72  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Excludes covered loans acquired in the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction.

Note 13 FDIC loss share asset and true-up payment obligation

In connection with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, BPPR entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC with respect to the covered loans and other real estate owned. Pursuant to the terms of the loss share agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC reimburses BPPR for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets, and BPPR reimburses the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid 80% reimbursement under loss share agreements. The loss share agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss and recoveries sharing for ten years expiring at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2020. The loss share agreement applicable to commercial (including construction) and consumer loans provides for FDIC loss sharing for five years expiring at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2015 and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for eight years expiring at the end of the quarter ending June 30, 2018, in each case, on the same terms and conditions as described above.

The following table sets forth the activity in the FDIC loss share asset for the periods presented.

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Balance at beginning of year

   $ 948,608      $ 1,399,098      $ 1,915,128  

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

     (189,959      (161,635      (129,676

Reversal of accelerated amortization

     12,492        —          —    

Credit impairment losses to be covered under loss sharing agreements

     32,038        60,454        58,187  

Reimbursable expenses

     58,117        50,985        30,771  

Decrease due to reciprocal accounting on amortization of contingent liability on unfunded commitments

     —          (473      (969

Payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements

     (269,397      (396,223      (462,016

Other adjustments attributable to FDIC loss sharing agreements

     (193      (3,598      (12,327
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

  591,706     948,608     1,399,098  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance due to the FDIC for recoveries on covered assets

  (49,252   (39,194   (16,763
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net balance of indemnity asset and amounts due from the FDIC

$ 542,454   $ 909,414   $ 1,382,335  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As discussed in Note 1, the FDIC indemnity asset amortization for the year ended December 31, 2014 included a benefit of approximately $12.5 million to reverse the impact of accelerated amortization expense recorded in prior periods. This amount will be recognized as expense over the remaining portion of the loss sharing agreement that expires in the quarter ending June 30, 2015.

During 2014, the Corporation revised its analysis of expected cash flows which resulted in a net decrease in estimated credit losses, which was driven mainly by certain commercial loan pools. Though this will have a positive impact on the Corporation’s interest accretion in future periods, the carrying value of the indemnification asset was amortized to reflect lower levels of expected

 

241


losses. This amortization is recognized over the shorter of the remaining life of the loan pools, which had an average life of approximately six years, or the indemnification asset, which expires at June 30, 2015, for commercial, construction and consumer loans and June 30, 2020 for single-family residential mortgage loans.

The following table presents the weighted average life of the loan portfolios subject to the FDIC loss sharing agreement at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

     Weighted Average Life  
     December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Commercial

     5.87 years        6.43 years  

Consumer

     5.76         3.13   

Construction

     0.99         1.30   

Mortgage

     7.30         6.91   

As part of the loss share agreement, BPPR agreed to make a true-up payment obligation (the “true-up payment”) to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day (the “true-up measurement date”) of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels. The estimated fair value of such true-up payment obligation is recorded as contingent consideration, which is included in the caption of other liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Under the loss sharing agreements, BPPR will pay to the FDIC 50% of the excess, if any, of: (i) 20% of the intrinsic loss estimate of $4.6 billion (or $925 million) (as determined by the FDIC) less (ii) the sum of: (A) 25% of the asset discount (per bid) (or ($1.1 billion)); plus (B) 25% of the cumulative shared-loss payments (defined as the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to BPPR minus the aggregate of all of the payments made or payable to the FDIC); plus (C) the sum of the period servicing amounts for every consecutive twelve-month period prior to and ending on the true-up measurement date in respect of each of the loss sharing agreements during which the loss sharing provisions of the applicable loss sharing agreement is in effect (defined as the product of the simple average of the principal amount of shared loss loans and shared loss assets at the beginning and end of such period times 1%).

The following table provides the fair value and the undiscounted amount of the true-up payment obligation at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Carrying amount (fair value)

   $ 129,304      $ 127,513  

Undiscounted amount

   $ 187,238      $ 185,372  

The loss share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow in order to receive reimbursement on losses from the FDIC. Under the loss share agreements, BPPR must:

 

   

manage and administer the covered assets and collect and effect charge-offs and recoveries with respect to such covered assets in a manner consistent with its usual and prudent business and banking practices and, with respect to single family shared-loss loans, the procedures (including collection procedures) customarily employed by BPPR in servicing and administering mortgage loans for its own account and the servicing procedures established by FNMA or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”), as in effect from time to time, and in accordance with accepted mortgage servicing practices of prudent lending institutions;

 

   

exercise its best judgment in managing, administering and collecting amounts on covered assets and effecting charge-offs with respect to the covered assets;

 

   

use commercially reasonable efforts to maximize recoveries with respect to losses on single family shared-loss assets and best efforts to maximize collections with respect to commercial shared-loss assets;

 

   

retain sufficient staff to perform the duties under the loss share agreements;

 

   

adopt and implement accounting, reporting, record-keeping and similar systems with respect to the commercial shared-loss assets;

 

   

comply with the terms of the modification guidelines approved by the FDIC or another federal agency for any single-family shared-loss loan;

 

242


   

provide notice with respect to proposed transactions pursuant to which a third party or affiliate will manage, administer or collect any commercial shared-loss assets;

 

   

file monthly and quarterly certificates with the FDIC specifying the amount of losses, charge-offs and recoveries; and

 

   

maintain books and records sufficient to ensure and document compliance with the terms of the loss share agreements.

Refer to Note 31, Commitment and Contingencies, for additional information on the settlement of the arbitration proceedings with the FDIC regarding the commercial loss share agreement.

Note 14 – Mortgage banking activities

Income from mortgage banking activities includes mortgage servicing fees earned in connection with administering residential mortgage loans and valuation adjustments on mortgage servicing rights. It also includes gain on sales and securitizations of residential mortgage loans and trading gains and losses on derivative contracts used to hedge the Corporation’s securitization activities. In addition, lower-of-cost-or-market valuation adjustments to residential mortgage loans held for sale, if any, are recorded as part of the mortgage banking activities.

The following table presents the components of mortgage banking activities:

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments:

        

Mortgage servicing fees

   $ 41,761      $ 45,465      $ 48,156  

Mortgage servicing rights fair value adjustments

     (24,683      (11,403      (17,406
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total mortgage servicing fees, net of fair value adjustments

  17,078     34,062     30,750  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation on loans held for sale

  31,213     26,719     76,181  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Trading account profit (loss):

Unrealized (losses) gains on outstanding derivative positions

  (726   746     304  

Realized (losses) gains on closed derivative positions

  (16,950   10,130     (22,464
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total trading account (loss) profit

  (17,676   10,876     (22,160
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total mortgage banking activities

$ 30,615   $ 71,657   $ 84,771  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

243


Note 15 – Transfers of financial assets and servicing assets

The Corporation typically transfers conforming residential mortgage loans in conjunction with GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC securitization transactions whereby the loans are exchanged for cash or securities and servicing rights. The securities issued through these transactions are guaranteed by the corresponding agency and, as such, under seller/service agreements the Corporation is required to service the loans in accordance with the agencies’ servicing guidelines and standards. Substantially, all mortgage loans securitized by the Corporation in GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC securities have fixed rates and represent conforming loans. As seller, the Corporation has made certain representations and warranties with respect to the originally transferred loans and, in the past, has sold certain loans with credit recourse to a government-sponsored entity, namely FNMA. Refer to Note 30 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of such arrangements.

No liabilities were incurred as a result of these securitizations during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 because they did not contain any credit recourse arrangements. The Corporation recorded a net gain of $32.8 million and $37.3 million, respectively, during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 related to the residential mortgage loan securitized.

The following tables present the initial fair value of the assets obtained as proceeds from residential mortgage loans securitized during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

     Proceeds obtained during the year ended December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Initial fair value  

Assets

           

Trading account securities:

           

Mortgage-backed securities - GNMA

     —        $ 674,557        —        $ 674,557  

Mortgage-backed securities - FNMA

     —          225,047        —          225,047  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total trading account securities

  —     $ 899,604     —     $ 899,604  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Mortgage servicing rights

  —       —     $ 11,560   $ 11,560  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  —     $ 899,604   $ 11,560   $ 911,164  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     Proceeds obtained during the year ended December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Initial fair value  

Assets

           

Trading account securities:

           

Mortgage-backed securities - GNMA

     —        $ 919,980        —        $ 919,980  

Mortgage-backed securities - FNMA

     —          438,236        —          438,236  

Mortgage-backed securities - FHLMC

     —          33,378        —          33,378  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total trading account securities

  —     $ 1,391,594     —     $ 1,391,594  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Mortgage servicing rights

  —       —     $ 17,639   $ 17,639  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

  —     $ 1,391,594   $ 17,639   $ 1,409,233  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014 the Corporation retained servicing rights on whole loan sales involving approximately $86 million in principal balance outstanding (2013 - $152 million), with net realized gains of approximately $3.2 million (2013 - $5.3 million). All loan sales performed during the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were without credit recourse agreements.

The Corporation recognizes as assets the rights to service loans for others, whether these rights are purchased or result from asset transfers such as sales and securitizations. These mortgage servicing rights (“MSR”) are measured at fair value.

The Corporation uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, including estimates of prepayment speeds, discount rate, cost to service, escrow account earnings, contractual servicing fee income, prepayment and late fees, among other considerations. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporation’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior.

 

244


The following table presents the changes in MSRs measured using the fair value method for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

Residential MSRs

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Fair value at beginning of period

   $ 161,099      $ 154,430  

Purchases

     —          45  

Servicing from securitizations or asset transfers

     12,583        19,262  

Changes due to payments on loans[1]

     (15,887      (22,556

Reduction due to loan repurchases

     (2,759      (3,871

Changes in fair value due to changes in valuation model inputs or assumptions

     (6,127      15,024  

Other disposals

     (215      (1,235
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fair value at end of period

$ 148,694   $ 161,099  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Represents the change due to collection / realization of expected cash flow over time.

Residential mortgage loans serviced for others were $15.6 billion at December 31, 2014 (2013 - $16.3 billion).

Net mortgage servicing fees, a component of mortgage banking activities in the consolidated statements of operations, include the changes from period to period in the fair value of the MSRs, including changes due to collection / realization of expected cash flows. Mortgage servicing fees, excluding fair value adjustments, for the year ended December 31, 2014 amounted to $41.8 million (2013 - $45.5 million; 2012 - $48.2 million). The banking subsidiaries receive servicing fees based on a percentage of the outstanding loan balance. At December 31, 2014, those weighted average mortgage servicing fees were 0.26% (2013 – 0.27%). Under these servicing agreements, the banking subsidiaries do not generally earn significant prepayment penalty fees on the underlying loans serviced.

The section below includes information on assumptions used in the valuation model of the MSRs, originated and purchased.

Key economic assumptions used in measuring the servicing rights derived from loans securitized or sold by the Corporation during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

 

     Years ended  
     December 31, 2014     December 31, 2013  

Prepayment speed

     6.1     6.6

Weighted average life

     16.4 years        15.2 years   

Discount rate (annual rate)

     10.8     11.0

 

245


Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of MSRs derived from sales and securitizations of mortgage loans performed by the banking subsidiaries and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

 

Originated MSRs  
     December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013  

Fair value of servicing rights

   $ 110,534     $ 115,753  

Weighted average life

     11.7 years        12.5 years   

Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate)

     8.6     8.0

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

   $ (4,089   $ (3,763

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

   $ (7,995   $ (7,459

Weighted average discount rate (annual rate)

     11.5     11.6

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

   $ (4,492   $ (4,930

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

   $ (8,701   $ (9,595

The banking subsidiaries also own servicing rights purchased from other financial institutions. The fair value of purchased MSRs, their related valuation assumptions and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions at December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

 

Purchased MSRs  
     December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013  

Fair value of servicing rights

   $ 38,160     $ 45,346  

Weighted average life

     11.0 years        10.9 years   

Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate)

     9.1     9.2

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

   $ (1,620   $ (1,969

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

   $ (2,924   $ (3,478

Weighted average discount rate (annual rate)

     10.7     10.8

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

   $ (1,603   $ (2,073

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

   $ (2,877   $ (3,655

The sensitivity analyses presented in the tables above for servicing rights are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10 and 20 percent variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also, in the sensitivity tables included herein, the effect of a variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of the retained interest is calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another (for example, increases in market interest rates may result in lower prepayments and increased credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the sensitivities.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation serviced $2.1 billion (2013 - $2.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans with credit recourse to the Corporation.

Under the GNMA securitizations, the Corporation, as servicer, has the right to repurchase (but not the obligation), at its option and without GNMA’s prior authorization, any loan that is collateral for a GNMA guaranteed mortgage-backed security when certain delinquency criteria are met. At the time that individual loans meet GNMA’s specified delinquency criteria and are eligible for repurchase, the Corporation is deemed to have regained effective control over these loans if the Corporation was the pool issuer. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation had recorded $81 million in mortgage loans on its consolidated statements of financial condition related to this buy-back option program (2013 - $48 million). As long as the Corporation continues to service the loans that continue to be collateral in a GNMA guaranteed mortgage-backed security, the MSR is recognized by the Corporation. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation repurchased approximately $145 million of mortgage loans under the GNMA buy-back option program (2013 - $209 million). The determination to repurchase these loans was based on the economic benefits of the transaction, which results in a reduction of the servicing costs for these severely delinquent loans, mostly related to principal and interest advances. Furthermore, due to their guaranteed nature, the risk associated with the loans is minimal. The Corporation places these loans under its loss mitigation programs and once brought back to current status, these may be either retained in portfolio or re-sold in the secondary market.

 

246


The Corporation also has the rights to service a portfolio of Small Business Administration (“SBA”) commercial loans. The SBA servicing rights are measured at the lower of cost or fair value method. The following table presents the activity in the SBA servicing rights for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. During 2014 and 2013, the Corporation did not execute any sale of SBA loans.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Balance at beginning of year

   $ 440      $ 695  

Amortization

     (180      (255
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

$ 260   $ 440  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fair value at end of year

$ 1,016   $ 1,609  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

SBA loans serviced for others were $427 million at December 31, 2014 (2013 - $451 million).

In 2014 weighted average servicing fees on the SBA serviced loans were approximately 1.00% (2013 - 1.02%).

Key economic assumptions used to estimate the fair value of SBA loans and the sensitivity to immediate changes in those assumptions were as follows:

 

SBA Loans

 

(In thousands)

   2014     2013  

Carrying amount of retained interests

   $ 260     $ 440  

Fair value of retained interests

   $ 1,016     $ 1,609  

Weighted average life

     2.8 years        3.0 years   

Weighted average prepayment speed (annual rate)

     7.9     7.2

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

   $ (18   $ (27

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

   $ (38   $ (56

Weighted average discount rate (annual rate)

     13.0     13.0

Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change

   $ (28   $ (46

Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change

   $ (57   $ (94

 

247


Quantitative information about delinquencies, net credit losses, and components of securitized financial assets and other assets managed together with them by the Corporation, including its own loan portfolio, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, are disclosed in the following tables. Loans securitized/sold represent loans in which the Corporation has continuing involvement in the form of credit recourse.

 

2014

 

(In thousands)

   Total principal amount of
loans, net of unearned
     Principal amount
60 days or more
past due
     Net credit losses
(recoveries)
 

Loans (owned and managed):

        

Commercial

   $ 8,134,576      $ 278,326      $ 53,990  

Construction

     251,820        13,812        (3,746

Legacy

     81,137        3,476        (892

Lease financing

     564,389        4,348        3,961  

Mortgage

     8,741,757        1,164,513        54,041  

Consumer

     3,875,581        99,595        109,737  

Covered loans

     2,542,662        540,369        66,154  

Less:

        

Loans securitized / sold

     (2,138,705      (183,876      (1,314

Loans held-for-sale

     (106,104      (19,878      (35,674
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio

$ 21,947,113   $ 1,900,685   $ 246,257  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

2013

 

(In thousands)

   Total principal amount of
loans, net of unearned
     Principal amount
60 days or more
past due
     Net credit losses
(recoveries)
 

Loans (owned and managed):

        

Commercial

   $ 10,037,787      $ 305,488      $ 270,266  

Construction

     206,084        23,771        (6,796

Legacy

     211,135        17,148        (2,583

Lease financing

     543,761        5,102        3,506  

Mortgage

     9,315,454        1,033,419        260,682  

Consumer

     3,932,226        95,329        96,971  

Covered loans

     2,984,427        771,662        76,210  

Less:

        

Loans securitized / sold

     (2,524,155      (196,590      (5,641

Loans held-for-sale

     (110,426      (1,184      (362,645
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio

$ 24,596,293   $ 2,054,145   $ 329,970  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

248


Note 16 – Premises and equipment

The premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization as follows:

 

(In thousands)

   Useful life in years    2014      2013  

Land

      $ 115,176      $ 110,453  
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Buildings

10-50   483,983     500,474  

Equipment

2-10   290,444     305,814  

Leasehold improvements

3-10   69,443     86,020  
     

 

 

    

 

 

 
  843,870     892,308  

Less - Accumulated depreciation and amortization

  475,162     488,497  
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Subtotal

  368,708     403,811  
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Construction in progress

  10,697     5,252  
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total premises and equipment, net

$ 494,581   $ 519,516  
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment for the year 2014 was $47.1 million (2013 -$48.2 million; 2012 - $46.7 million), of which $23.8 million (2013 - $24.8 million; 2012 - $24.2 million) was charged to occupancy expense and $23.3 million (2013 - $23.4 million; 2012 - $22.5 million) was charged to equipment, communications and other operating expenses. Occupancy expense is net of rental income of $28.1 million (2013 - $26.6 million; 2012 - $22.9 million).

Note 17 – Other real estate owned

The following tables present the other real estate owned activity, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

     For the year ended December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Non-covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Non-covered
OREO
Mortgage
    Covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Covered
OREO
Mortgage
    Total  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 48,649     $ 86,852     $ 120,215     $ 47,792     $ 303,508  

Write-downs in value

     (7,112     (3,628     (26,657     (4,969     (42,366

Additions

     16,200       65,300       55,582       21,769       158,851  

Sales

     (20,042     (49,618     (59,219     (19,028     (147,907

Other adjustments

     1,288       (2,389     (4,527     (692     (6,320
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 38,983   $ 96,517   $ 85,394   $ 44,872   $ 265,766  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     For the year ended December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Non-covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Non-covered
OREO
Mortgage
    Covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Covered
OREO
Mortgage
    Total  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 135,862     $ 130,982     $ 99,398     $ 39,660     $ 405,902  

Write-downs in value

     (11,377     (9,525     (18,857     (4,102     (43,861

Additions

     32,175       82,985       87,800       30,037       232,997  

Sales

     (108,254     (118,596     (48,447     (17,720     (293,017

Other adjustments

     243       1,006       321       (83     1,487  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 48,649   $ 86,852   $ 120,215   $ 47,792   $ 303,508  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

249


     For the year ended December 31, 2012  

(In thousands)

   Non-covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Non-covered
OREO
Mortgage
    Covered
OREO
Commercial/ Construction
    Covered
OREO
Mortgage
    Total  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 90,230     $ 82,267     $ 77,776     $ 31,359     $ 281,632  

Write-downs in value

     (13,727     (10,823     (7,466     (767     (32,783

Additions

     110,947       108,312       60,920       23,195       303,374  

Sales

     (51,422     (46,091     (32,022     (13,122     (142,657

Other adjustments

     (166     (2,683     190       (1,005     (3,664
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 135,862   $ 130,982   $ 99,398   $ 39,660   $ 405,902  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 18 – Other assets

The caption of other assets in the consolidated statements of financial condition consists of the following major categories:

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Net deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance)

   $ 812,819      $ 761,768  

Investments under the equity method

     225,625        197,006  

Bank-owned life insurance program

     —          228,805  

Prepaid FDIC insurance assessment

     360        383  

Prepaid taxes

     198,120        91,504  

Other prepaid expenses

     83,719        67,108  

Derivative assets

     25,362        34,710  

Trades receivables from brokers and counterparties

     66,949        71,680  

Others

     233,489        234,594  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other assets

$ 1,646,443   $ 1,687,558  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

On February 1, 2014, BHD, the Corporation’s equity method investee based in the Dominican Republic, completed a merger transaction in which it acquired the net assets of Centro Financiero León. Centro Financiero León was the holding company of Banco León, the fourth largest bank in terms of assets in the Dominican Republic. In connection with the transaction, BHD issued additional shares which diluted the Corporation’s equity participation from 19.99% to 15.79%. As a result of this transaction, the Corporation recognized a net gain of $14.2 million during the first quarter of 2014, due to BHD’s increase in net assets. The gain was partially offset by approximately $7.7 million resulting from the reclassification from other comprehensive income into earnings of the cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment due to the reduction in the Corporation’s ownership percentage. As of December 31, 2014, the Corporation had a 15.82% equity participation and continues to have significant influence over BHD León. Accordingly, this investment is accounted for under the equity method and is evaluated for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has occurred that is other than temporary.

On September 25, 2014, BPNA surrendered its bank owned life insurance contracts, which had a balance of $231.2 million at the time of the transaction. BPNA received approximately $231.4 million in satisfaction of its surrender request. The transaction resulted in a gain of $0.1 million.

Prepaid taxes at December 31, 2014 include payments of $45 million in income taxes in connection with the Closing Agreement signed with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury on June 30, 2014, and $25.7 million of unamortized corporate personal property tax and municipal tax paid during the second quarter of 2014.

 

250


Note 19 – Investments in equity investees

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation recorded pre-tax earnings of $39,6 million, from its equity investments, compared to $42.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. The carrying value of the Corporation’s equity method investments was $226 million and $197 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The following table presents aggregated summarized financial information of the Corporation’s equity method investees:

 

Years ended December 31,

   2014      2013      2012  
(in thousands)                     

Operating results:

        

Total revenues

   $ 715,966      $ 1,302,637      $ 796,185  

Total expenses

     343,100         1,024,713        570,450  

Income tax (benefit) expense

     43,993        39,301        (36,914
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

$ 328,873   $ 238,623   $ 262,649  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

   2014      2013  
(in thousands)              

Balance Sheet:

     

Total assets

   $ 7,421,225      $ 5,987,802  

Total liabilities

   $ 5,182,478      $ 4,036,484  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Summarized financial information for these investees may be presented on a lag, due to the unavailability of information for the investees, at the respective balance sheet dates.

Note 20 – Goodwill and other intangible assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2014, and 2013, allocated by reportable segments and corporate group, were as follows (refer to Note 45 for the definition of the Corporation’s reportable segments):

 

2014

 

(In thousands)

   Balance at
January 1, 2014
     Goodwill on
acquisition
     Purchase
accounting
adjustments
     Goodwill written off
related to discontinued
operations
    Other      Balance at
December 31,2014
 

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

   $ 245,679      $ 4,430      $ —        $ —       $ —        $ 250,109  

Banco Popular North America

     402,078         —          —           (186,511     —          215,567  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 647,757   $ 4,430   $ —     $ (186,511 $ —     $ 465,676  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

2013

 

(In thousands)

   Balance at
January 1, 2013
     Goodwill on
acquisition
     Purchase
accounting
adjustments
     Other
     Balance at
December 31, 2013
 

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

   $ 245,679      $ —        $ —        $ —        $ 245,679  

Banco Popular North America

     402,078        —          —          —          402,078  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 647,757   $ —     $ —     $ —     $ 647,757  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The goodwill acquired during 2014 of $4.4 million was related to the acquisition of an insurance benefits business.

 

251


Goodwill Impairment Test

As discussed in Note 4, Discontinued Operations, on April 22, 2014, BPNA entered into definitive agreements to sell its regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida to three different buyers. In connection with the transactions, the Corporation is relocating certain back office operations to Puerto Rico and New York. During the second quarter of 2014, the assets and liabilities for those regions were reclassified as held-for-sale in accordance with ASC 360-10-45. As a result of the reclassification, and in accordance with ASC 350-20-40, BPNA allocated a proportionate share of the goodwill balance to the discontinued businesses on a relative fair value basis and performed an impairment test for the goodwill allocated to each of the discontinued operations as well as for retained business, each as a separate reporting unit. This allocation of goodwill and related impairment analysis resulted in an impairment charge of $186.5 million during the second quarter of 2014. The goodwill impairment charge is a non-cash charge that did not have an impact on the Corporation’s tangible capital or regulatory capital ratios. The goodwill impairment analysis of the retained portion of the BPNA operations resulted in no impairment as of June 30, 2014.

The methodology used to determine the relative value of the regions sold and the retained portion of the BPNA reporting unit for purpose of the goodwill allocation among these reporting units takes into consideration the fair value estimates resulting from a combination of: (1) the average price to tangible book multiple based on a regression analysis of the projected return on equity for comparable companies, (2) the average price to revenue multiple based on a regression analysis of the projected revenue margin for comparable companies, and (3) the average price to earnings multiple based on comparable companies. After allocating the carrying amount of goodwill to the regions sold and the retained portion, the Corporation performed the goodwill impairment test of ASC 350-20 to each region sold and to the retained business reporting unit. The fair value of each region was based on the transaction price agreed with the buyers as part of the step 2 of the goodwill impairment analysis. This fair value was compared to the fair value of the assets and liabilities sold including any unrecognized intangible asset. The goodwill impairment analysis of the regions sold indicated that all the goodwill allocated to each region sold was impaired, and accordingly, the Corporation recorded an impairment charge of $186.5 million during the second quarter of 2014.

The following table presents the gross amount of goodwill and accumulated impairment losses by reportable segments.

 

December 31, 2014

 

(In thousands)

   Balance at
January 1,
2014
(gross amounts)
     Accumulated
impairment
losses
     Balance at
January 1,
2014
(net amounts)
     Balance at
December 31,
2014
(gross amounts)
     Accumulated
impairment
losses
     Balance at
December 31,
2014
(net amounts)
 

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

   $ 245,679      $ —        $ 245,679      $ 250,109      $ —        $ 250,109  

Banco Popular North America

     566,489        164,411        402,078        379,978        164,411        215,567  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 812,168   $ 164,411   $ 647,757   $ 630,087   $ 164,411   $ 465,676  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

(In thousands)

   Balance at
January 1,
2013
(gross amounts)
     Accumulated
impairment
losses
     Balance at
January 1,
2013
(net amounts)
     Balance at
December 31,
2013
(gross amounts)
     Accumulated
impairment
losses
     Balance at
December 31,
2013
(net amounts)
 

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

   $ 245,679      $ —        $ 245,679      $ 245,679      $ —        $ 245,679  

Banco Popular North America

     566,489        164,411        402,078        566,489        164,411        402,078  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Popular, Inc.

$ 812,168   $ 164,411   $ 647,757   $ 812,168   $ 164,411   $ 647,757  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The accumulated impairment losses in the BPNA reportable segment are associated with E-LOAN.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Corporation had $ 6 million of identifiable intangible assets, with indefinite useful lives, mostly associated with E-LOAN’s trademark.

 

252


The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets subject to amortization:

 

(In thousands)

   Gross
Carrying
Amount
     Accumulated
Amortization
     Net
Carrying
Value
 

December 31, 2014

        

Core deposits

   $ 50,679      $ 32,006      $ 18,673  

Other customer relationships

     19,452        6,644        12,808  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other intangible assets

$ 70,131   $ 38,650   $ 31,481  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

Core deposits

$ 77,885   $ 51,737   $ 26,148  

Other customer relationships

  17,555     4,712     12,843  

Other intangibles

  135     107     28  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other intangible assets

$ 95,575   $ 56,556   $ 39,019  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

During the year ended 2014 the Corporation acquired $1.9 million in other customer relationships intangible assets related to the purchase of the above mentioned insurance benefits business, which are to be amortized to operating expenses over a 5-year period. During the year ended 2013, the Corporation recognized $720 thousand of other customer relationship intangible assets associated with the purchase of a dwelling and flood insurance portfolio.

Core deposits and other intangibles with gross amount of $27 million became fully amortized during 2014 and, as such, their gross amount and accumulated amortization were eliminated from the tabular disclosure presented in the preceding table.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation recognized $ 8.2 million in amortization expense related to other intangible assets with definite useful lives (2013 - $ 8.0 million; 2012 - $ 8.2 million).

The following table presents the estimated amortization of the intangible assets with definite useful lives for each of the following periods:

 

(In thousands)

      

Year 2015

   $ 7,607  

Year 2016

     7,322  

Year 2017

     4,574  

Year 2018

     4,481  

Year 2019

     4,285  

Results of the Goodwill Impairment Test

The Corporation’s goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets having an indefinite useful life are tested for impairment at least annually and on a more frequent basis if events or circumstances indicate impairment could have taken place. Such events could include, among others, a significant adverse change in the business climate, an adverse action by a regulator, an unanticipated change in the competitive environment and a decision to change the operations or dispose of a reporting unit.

Under applicable accounting standards, goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step test. The first step of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired; however, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step must be performed. The second step involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill for each reporting unit for which the first step indicated possible impairment. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination, which is the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit, as determined in the first step, over the aggregate fair values of the individual assets, liabilities and

 

253


identifiable intangibles (including any unrecognized intangible assets, such as unrecognized core deposits and trademark) as if the reporting unit was being acquired in a business combination and the fair value of the reporting unit was the price paid to acquire the reporting unit. The Corporation estimates the fair values of the assets and liabilities of a reporting unit, consistent with the requirements of the fair value measurements accounting standard, which defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of the assets and liabilities reflects market conditions, thus volatility in prices could have a material impact on the determination of the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill at the impairment test date. The adjustments to measure the assets, liabilities and intangibles at fair value are for the purpose of measuring the implied fair value of goodwill and such adjustments are not reflected in the consolidated statement of financial condition. If the implied fair value of goodwill exceeds the goodwill assigned to the reporting unit, there is no impairment. If the goodwill assigned to a reporting unit exceeds the implied fair value of the goodwill, an impairment charge is recorded for the excess. An impairment loss recognized cannot exceed the amount of goodwill assigned to a reporting unit, and the loss establishes a new basis in the goodwill. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not permitted under applicable accounting standards.

The Corporation performed the annual goodwill impairment evaluation for the entire organization during the third quarter of 2014 using July 31, 2014 as the annual evaluation date. The reporting units utilized for this evaluation were those that are one level below the business segments, which are the legal entities within the reportable segment. The Corporation assigns goodwill to the reporting units when carrying out a business combination.

In determining the fair value of a reporting unit, the Corporation generally uses a combination of methods, including market price multiples of comparable companies and transactions, as well as discounted cash flow analysis. Management evaluates the particular circumstances of each reporting unit in order to determine the most appropriate valuation methodology. The Corporation evaluates the results obtained under each valuation methodology to identify and understand the key value drivers in order to ascertain that the results obtained are reasonable and appropriate under the circumstances. Elements considered include current market and economic conditions, developments in specific lines of business, and any particular features in the individual reporting units.

The computations require management to make estimates and assumptions. Critical assumptions that are used as part of these evaluations include:

 

   

a selection of comparable publicly traded companies, based on nature of business, location and size;

 

   

a selection of comparable acquisition and capital raising transactions;

 

   

the discount rate applied to future earnings, based on an estimate of the cost of equity;

 

   

the potential future earnings of the reporting unit; and

 

   

the market growth and new business assumptions.

For purposes of the market comparable approach, valuations were determined by calculating average price multiples of relevant value drivers from a group of companies that are comparable to the reporting unit being analyzed and applying those price multiples to the value drivers of the reporting unit. Multiples used are minority based multiples and thus, no control premium adjustment is made to the comparable companies market multiples. While the market price multiple is not an assumption, a presumption that it provides an indicator of the value of the reporting unit is inherent in the valuation. The determination of the market comparables also involves a degree of judgment.

For purposes of the discounted cash flows (“DCF”) approach, the valuation is based on estimated future cash flows. The financial projections used in the DCF valuation analysis for each reporting unit are based on the most recent (as of the valuation date) financial projections presented to the Corporation’s Asset / Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”). The growth assumptions included in these projections are based on management’s expectations for each reporting unit’s financial prospects considering economic and industry conditions as well as particular plans of each entity (i.e. restructuring plans, de-leveraging, etc.). The cost of equity used to discount the cash flows was calculated using the Ibbotson Build-Up Method and ranged from 12.15% to 16.83% for the 2014 analysis. The Ibbotson Build-Up Method builds up a cost of equity starting with the rate of return of a “risk-free” asset (20-year U.S. Treasury note) and adds to it additional risk elements such as equity risk premium, size premium and industry risk premium. The resulting discount rates were analyzed in terms of reasonability given the current market conditions and adjustments were made when necessary.

 

254


For BPNA reporting unit, the average estimated fair value calculated in Step 1, using all valuation methodologies exceeded BPNA’s equity value by approximately $205 million in the July 31, 2014 annual test. Accordingly, there is no indication of impairment of goodwill recorded in BPNA at July 31, 2014 and there is no need for a Step 2 analysis. BPNA failed Step 1 in the annual test as of July 31, 2013 requiring the completion of Step 2. The results of the Step 2 indicated that the implied fair value of goodwill exceeded the goodwill carrying value at July 31, 2013 resulting in no goodwill impairment.

For the BPPR reporting unit, the average estimated fair value calculated in Step 1 using all valuation methodologies exceeded BPPR’s equity value by approximately $337 million in the July 31, 2014 annual test as compared with approximately $387 million at July 31, 2013. This result indicates there would be no indication of impairment on the goodwill recorded in BPPR at July 31, 2014. The goodwill balance of BPPR and BPNA, as legal entities, represented approximately 95% of the Corporation’s total goodwill balance as of the July 31, 2014 valuation date.

Furthermore, as part of the analyses, management performed a reconciliation of the aggregate fair values determined for the reporting units to the market capitalization of Popular, Inc. concluding that the fair value results determined for the reporting units in the July 31, 2014 annual assessment were reasonable.

The goodwill impairment evaluation process requires the Corporation to make estimates and assumptions with regard to the fair value of the reporting units. Actual values may differ significantly from these estimates. Such differences could result in future impairment of goodwill that would, in turn, negatively impact the Corporation’s results of operations and the reporting units where the goodwill is recorded. Declines in the Corporation’s market capitalization could increase the risk of goodwill impairment in the future.

Management monitors events or changes in circumstances between annual tests to determine if these events or changes in circumstances would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, other than goodwill, the Corporation had $ 6 million of identifiable intangible assets, with indefinite useful lives, mostly associated with E-LOAN’S trademark.

The valuation of the E-LOAN trademark was performed using the “relief-from-royalty” valuation approach. The basis of the “relief-from-royalty” method is that, by virtue of having ownership of the trademark, the Corporation is relieved from having to pay a royalty, usually expressed as a percentage of revenue, for the use of trademark. The main attributes involved in the valuation of this intangible asset include the royalty rate, revenue projections that benefit from the use of this intangible, after-tax royalty savings derived from the ownership of the intangible, and the discount rate to apply to the projected benefits to arrive at the present value of this intangible. Since estimates are an integral part of this trademark impairment analysis, changes in these estimates could have a significant impact on the calculated fair value. There were no impairments recognized during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 related to E-LOAN’s trademark.

Note 21 – Deposits

Total interest bearing deposits as of the end of the periods presented consisted of:

 

     December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Savings accounts

   $ 6,737,370      $ 6,839,126  

NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits

     4,811,972        5,637,985  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total savings, NOW, money market and other interest bearing demand deposits

  11,549,342     12,477,111  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Certificates of deposit:

Under $100,000

  4,211,180     5,101,711  

$100,000 and over

  3,263,265     3,209,641  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total certificates of deposit

  7,474,445     8,311,352  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest bearing deposits

$ 19,023,787   $ 20,788,463  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

255


A summary of certificates of deposit by maturity at December 31, 2014 follows:

 

(In thousands)

      

2015

   $ 5,011,262  

2016

     958,246  

2017

     572,706  

2018

     363,691  

2019

     495,931  

2020 and thereafter

     72,609  
  

 

 

 

Total certificates of deposit

$ 7,474,445  
  

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation had brokered deposits amounting to $ 1.9 billion (2013 - $ 2.4 billion).

The aggregate amount of overdrafts in demand deposit accounts that were reclassified to loans was $9 million at December 31, 2014 (2013 - $10 million).

Note 22 – Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

The following table summarizes certain information on federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase at December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   2014     2013  

Federal funds purchased

   $ 100,000     $ —    

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

     1,171,657       1,659,292  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 1,271,657   $ 1,659,292  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Maximum aggregate balance outstanding at any month-end

$ 2,208,213   $ 2,269,565  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Average monthly aggregate balance outstanding

$ 1,732,199   $ 1,842,879  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average interest rate:

For the year

  3.85 %   1.92 %

At December 31

  0.62 %   2.07 %
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The repurchase agreements outstanding at December 31, 2014 were collateralized by $ 1.0 billion in investment securities available for sale and $ 81 million in trading securities, compared with $ 1.3 billion in investment securities available for sale, $ 309 million in trading securities and $ 70 million in securities sold not yet delivered classified as other assets at December 31, 2013. It is the Corporation’s policy to maintain effective control over assets sold under agreements to repurchase; accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on the consolidated statement of financial condition.

In addition, there were repurchase agreements outstanding collateralized by $ 146 million at December 31, 2014 and $ 189 million at December 31, 2013, in securities purchased underlying agreements to resell to which the Corporation has the right to repledge. It is the Corporation’s policy to take possession of securities purchased under agreements to resell. However, the counterparties to such agreements maintain effective control over such securities, and accordingly are not reflected in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition.

 

256


The following table presents the liability associated with the repurchase transactions (including accrued interest), their maturities and weighted average interest rates. Also, it includes the carrying value and approximate market value of the collateral (including accrued interest) at December 31, 2014 and 2013. The information excludes repurchase agreement transactions which were collateralized with securities or other assets held-for-trading purposes or which have been obtained under agreements to resell.

 

     2014     2013  

(Dollars in thousands)

   Repurchase
liability
     Carrying
value of
collateral
     Market
value of
collateral
     Repurchase
liability
weighted
average
interest rate
    Repurchase
liability
     Carrying
value of
collateral
     Market value
of collateral
     Repurchase
liability
weighted
average
interest rate
 

Obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities

                      

Within 30 days

   $ 210,292      $ 220,229      $ 220,229        0.36   $ 64,109      $ 67,721      $ 67,721        0.23

After 30 to 90 days

     25,765        27,349        27,349        0.34       —          —          —          —    

After 90 days

     420,602        448,992        448,992        0.44       156,092        177,031        177,031        4.89  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total obligations of U.S. government sponsored entities

  656,659     696,570     696,570     0.41     220,201     244,752     244,752     3.53  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Mortgage-backed securities

Within 30 days

  3,227     3,612     3,612     0.40     23,998     26,591     26,591     0.46  

After 90 days

  166,226     183,782     183,782     1.25     240,313     286,166     286,166     3.61  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total mortgage-backed securities

  169,453     187,394     187,394     1.23     264,311     312,757     312,757     3.32  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Collateralized mortgage obligations

Within 30 days

  15,277     19,087     19,087     0.27     235,306     267,120     267,120     0.39  

After 30 to 90 days

  55,427     59,472     59,472     0.56     103,754     114,643     114,643     0.44  

After 90 days

  71,448     78,683     78,683     0.60     322,881     370,197     370,197     4.24  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total collateralized mortgage obligations

  142,152     157,242     157,242     0.55     661,941     751,960     751,960     2.28  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 968,264   $ 1,041,206   $ 1,041,206     0.57 $ 1,146,453   $ 1,309,469   $ 1,309,469     2.76
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 23 – Other short-term borrowings

The following table presents a breakdown of other short-term borrowings at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Advances with the FHLB paying interest at maturity, at fixed rate of 0.39% (2013 - 0.44%)

   $ 20,000      $ 400,000  

Others

     1,200        1,200  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other short-term borrowings

$ 21,200   $ 401,200  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The maximum aggregate balance outstanding at any month-end was approximately $ 801 million (2013 - $ 1,226 million). The weighted average interest rate of other short-term borrowings at December 31, 2014 was 0.36% (2013 – 0.38%). The average aggregate balance outstanding during the year was approximately $ 154 million (2013 - $729 million). The weighted average interest rate during the year was 0.44% (2013 – 0.41%).

Note 24 presents additional information with respect to available credit facilities.

 

257


Note 24 – Notes payable

Notes payable outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, consisted of the following:

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Advances with the FHLB maturing from 2015 to 2021 paying interest at monthly fixed rates ranging from 0.45% to 4.19% ( 2013 - 0.27% to 4.19%)

   $ 802,198      $ 589,229  

Unsecured senior debt securities maturing on 2019 paying interest semiannually at a fixed rate of 7.00%

     450,000        —    

Term notes paying interest semiannually at fixed rate of 7.47%

     —          675  

Term notes paying interest monthly at a floating rate of 3.00% over the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate [1]

     —          14  

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities) maturing from 2027 to 2034 with fixed interest rates ranging from 6.125% to 8.327% (Refer to Note 26)

     439,800        439,800  

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities) ($936,000 less discount of $404,460 at December 31, 2013) with no stated maturity and a contractual fixed interest rate of 5.00% until, but excluding December 5, 2013 and 9.00% thereafter (Refer to Note 26)

     —          531,540  

Others

     19,830        23,496  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total notes payable

$ 1,711,828   $ 1,584,754  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] The 10-year U.S. Treasury note key index rate at December 31, 2013 was 3.03%.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation received approval from the Federal Reserve System to repay the $935 million in TARP Capital Purchase Program funds. On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repayment of these funds, which were partially funded with $400 million from the proceeds of the issuance of its $450 million aggregate principal amount of 7% Senior Notes due on 2019, which settled on July 1, 2014. Accordingly, during the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation accelerated the related amortization of $414.1 million of discount and deferred costs, which is reflected as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. Refer to additional information on Note 26 - Trust Preferred Securities.

The following table presents the aggregate amounts by contractual maturities of notes payable at December 31, 2014.

 

Year

   (In thousands)  

2015

   $ 328,917  

2016

     250,966  

2017

     82,983  

2018

     106,934  

2019

     463,270  

Later years

     478,758  
  

 

 

 

Total notes payable

$ 1,711,828  
  

 

 

 

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation had borrowing facilities available with the FHLB whereby the Corporation could borrow up to $3.7 billion based on the assets pledged with the FHLB at that date (2013 - $3.0 billion). The FHLB advances at December 31, 2014 are collateralized with mortgage and commercial loans, and do not have restrictive covenants or callable features. The maximum borrowing capacity is dependent on certain computations as determined by the FHLB, which consider the amount and type of assets available for collateral.

 

258


Also, the Corporation has a borrowing facility at the discount window of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. At December 31, 2014, the borrowing capacity at the discount window approximated $2.1 billion (2013 - $3.4 billion), which remained unused at December 31, 2014 and 2013. The facility is a collateralized source of credit that is highly reliable even under difficult market conditions.

Note 25 – Offsetting of financial assets and liabilities

The following tables present the potential effect of rights of setoff associated with the Corporation’s recognized financial assets and liabilities at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

As of December 31, 2014

 
       Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position
 

(In thousands)

   Gross Amount
of Recognized
Assets
     Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
     Net Amounts of
Assets
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
     Financial
Instruments
     Securities
Collateral
Received
     Cash
Collateral
Received
     Net Amount  

Derivatives

   $ 25,361      $ —        $ 25,361      $ 320      $ —        $ —        $ 25,041  

Reverse repurchase agreements

     151,134        —          151,134         —          151,134        —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 176,495   $ —     $ 176,495   $ 320   $ 151,134   $ —     $ 25,041  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 
       Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position
 

(In thousands)

   Gross Amount
of Recognized
Liabilities
     Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
     Net Amounts of
Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
     Financial
Instruments
     Securities
Collateral
Pledged
     Cash
Collateral
Pledged
     Net Amount  

Derivatives

   $ 23,032      $ —        $ 23,032      $ 320      $ 8,781      $ —        $ 13,931  

Repurchase agreements

     1,171,657        —          1,171,657         —          1,171,657        —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 1,194,689   $ —     $ 1,194,689   $ 320   $ 1,180,438   $ —     $ 13,931  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 
       Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position
 

(In thousands)

   Gross Amount
of Recognized
Assets
     Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
     Net Amounts of
Assets
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
     Financial
Instruments
     Securities
Collateral
Received
     Cash
Collateral
Received
     Net Amount  

Derivatives

   $ 34,793      $ —        $ 34,793      $ 1,220      $ —        $ —        $ 33,573  

Reverse repurchase agreements

     175,965        —          175,965        —           175,965        —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 210,758   $ —     $ 210,758   $ 1,220   $ 175,965   $ —     $ 33,573  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

259


As of December 31, 2013

 
       Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of
Financial Position
 

(In thousands)

   Gross Amount
of Recognized
Liabilities
     Gross Amounts
Offset in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
     Net Amounts of
Liabilities
Presented in the
Statement of
Financial
Position
     Financial
Instruments
     Securities
Collateral
Pledged
     Cash
Collateral
Received
     Net Amount  

Derivatives

   $ 32,378      $ —        $ 32,378      $ 1,220      $ 14,003      $ —        $ 17,155  

Repurchase agreements

     1,659,292        —          1,659,292         —          1,659,292        —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ 1,691,670   $ —     $ 1,691,670   $ 1,220   $ 1,673,295   $ —     $ 17,155  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Corporation’s derivatives are subject to agreements which allow a right of set-off with each respective counterparty. In addition, the Corporation’s Repurchase Agreements and Reverse Repurchase Agreements have a right of set-off with the respective counterparty under the supplemental terms of the Master Repurchase Agreements. In an event of default each party has a right of set-off against the other party for amounts owed in the related agreement and any other amount or obligation owed in respect of any other agreement or transaction between them.

Note 26 – Trust preferred securities

At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, statutory trusts established by the Corporation (BanPonce Trust I, Popular Capital Trust I, Popular North America Capital Trust I and Popular Capital Trust II) had issued trust preferred securities (also referred to as “capital securities”) to the public. The proceeds from such issuances, together with the proceeds of the related issuances of common securities of the trusts (the “common securities”), were used by the trusts to purchase junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (the “junior subordinated debentures”) issued by the Corporation. In August 2009, the Corporation established the Popular Capital Trust III for the purpose of exchanging the shares of Series C preferred stock held by the U.S. Treasury at the time for trust preferred securities issued by this trust. In connection with this exchange, the trust used the Series C preferred stock, together with the proceeds of issuance and sale of common securities of the trust, to purchase junior subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation. As further explained below, the Popular Capital Trust III was dissolved following the repurchase of their capital securities on July 2, 2014.

The sole assets of the trusts consisted of the junior subordinated debentures of the Corporation and the related accrued interest receivable. These trusts are not consolidated by the Corporation pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The junior subordinated debentures are included by the Corporation as notes payable in the consolidated statements of financial condition, while the common securities issued by the issuer trusts are included as other investment securities. The common securities of each trust are wholly-owned, or indirectly wholly-owned, by the Corporation.

 

260


The following table presents financial data pertaining to the different trusts at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   As of December 31, 2014  

Issuer

   BanPonce
Trust I
    Popular
Capital Trust I
    Popular
North America
Capital Trust I
    Popular
Capital Trust Il
 

Capital securities

   $ 52,865      $ 181,063      $ 91,651      $ 101,023   

Distribution rate

     8.327     6.700     6.564     6.125

Common securities

   $ 1,637      $ 5,601      $ 2,835      $ 3,125   

Junior subordinated debentures aggregate liquidation amount

   $ 54,502      $ 186,664      $ 94,486      $ 104,148   

Stated maturity date

    
 
February
2027
  
  
   
 
November
2033
  
  
   
 
September
2034
  
  
   
 
December
2034
  
  

Reference notes

    

 

[1],[3],[6]

 

  

 

   

 

[2],[4],[5]

 

  

 

   

 

[1],[3],[5]

 

  

 

   

 

[2],[4],[5]

 

  

 

 

(Dollars in thousands)

   As of December 31, 2013  

Issuer

   BanPonce
Trust I
    Popular
Capital Trust I
    Popular
North America
Capital Trust I
    Popular
Capital Trust Il
    Popular
Capital Trust III
 

Capital securities

   $ 52,865      $ 181,063      $ 91,651      $ 101,023      $ 935,000   

Distribution rate

     8.327     6.700     6.564     6.125    
 
 
 
 
 
5.000% until,
but excluding
December 5,
2013 and
9.000%
thereafter
  
  
  
  
  
  

Common securities

   $ 1,637      $ 5,601      $ 2,835      $ 3,125      $ 1,000   

Junior subordinated debentures aggregate liquidation amount

   $ 54,502      $ 186,664      $ 94,486      $ 104,148      $ 936,000   

Stated maturity date

    
 
February
2027
  
  
   
 
November
2033
  
  
   
 
September
2034
  
  
   
 
December
2034
  
  
    Perpetual   

Reference notes

    

 

[1],[3],[6]

 

  

 

   

 

[2],[4],[5]

 

  

 

   

 

[1],[3],[5]

 

  

 

   

 

[2],[4],[5]

 

  

 

   

 

[2],[4],[7],[8]

 

  

 

 

[1] Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by Popular North America and indirectly wholly-owned by the Corporation.
[2] Statutory business trust that is wholly-owned by the Corporation.
[3] The obligations of PNA under the junior subordinated debentures and its guarantees of the capital securities under the trust are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement.
[4] These capital securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis by the Corporation to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement.
[5] The Corporation has the right, subject to any required prior approval from the Federal Reserve, to redeem after certain dates or upon the occurrence of certain events mentioned below, the junior subordinated debentures at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The maturity of the junior subordinated debentures may be shortened at the option of the Corporation prior to their stated maturity dates (i) on or after the stated optional redemption dates stipulated in the agreements, in whole at any time or in part from time to time, or (ii) in whole, but not in part, at any time within 90 days following the occurrence and during the continuation of a tax event, an investment company event or a capital treatment event as set forth in the indentures relating to the capital securities, in each case subject to regulatory approval.
[6] Same as [5] above, except that the investment company event does not apply for early redemption.
[7] The debentures are perpetual and may be redeemed by Popular at any time, subject to the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
[8] Carrying value of junior subordinated debentures of $ 532 million at December 31, 2013 ($ 936 million aggregate liquidation amount, net of $ 404 million discount).

During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Corporation received approval from the Federal Reserve System to repay the $935 million in TARP Capital Purchase Program funds. On July 2, 2014, the Corporation completed the repurchase of $935 million of Fixed Rate Popular Capital Trust III Capital Securities, $1,000 liquidation amount per security (the “trust capital securities”), of Popular Capital Trust III, held by the U.S. Treasury. On July 23, 2014, the Corporation exchanged $936 million of Fixed Rate Perpetual Junior Subordinated Debentures Series A (the “trust debentures”) held by Popular Capital Trust III for the trust capital

 

261


securities and the common securities of Popular Capital Trust III, in the amount of $1 million, held by the Corporation. The trust debentures were then cancelled and the obligations of the Corporation under the related indenture were satisfied and discharged. On the same date, Popular Capital Trust III was dissolved. In connection with the repayment of TARP, the Corporation accelerated the related amortization of the discount and deferred costs amounting to $414.1 million during the second quarter of 2014, which was reflected as part of interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

In accordance with the Federal Reserve Board guidance under Basel I, the trust preferred securities represent restricted core capital elements and currently qualify as Tier 1 capital, subject to certain quantitative limits. The aggregate amount of restricted core capital elements that may be included in the Tier 1 capital of a banking organization must not exceed 25% of the sum of all core capital elements (including cumulative perpetual preferred stock and trust preferred securities). Amounts of restricted core capital elements in excess of this limit generally may be included in Tier 2 capital, subject to further limitations. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s restricted core capital elements did not exceed the 25% limitation. Thus, all trust preferred securities were allowed as Tier I capital. At December 31, 2013, the Corporation’s restricted core capital elements also did not exceed the 25% limitation.

In July 2013, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System approved final rules (“Basel III Capital Rules”) to establish a new comprehensive regulatory capital framework for all U.S. banking organizations. The New Capital Rules generally implement the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s (the “Basel Committee”) December 2010 final capital framework referred to as “Basel III” for strengthening international capital standards and several changes to the U.S. regulatory capital regime required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection on Act (“Dodd-Frank”). The Basel III Capital Rules require that capital instruments such as trust preferred securities be phased-out of Tier 1 capital. The Corporation’s Tier I capital level at December 31, 2014 included $ 427 million of trust preferred securities that are subject to the phase-out provisions of the Basel III Capital Rules. The Corporation would be allowed to include only 25% of such trust preferred securities in Tier I capital as of January 1, 2015 and 0% as of January 1, 2016 and thereafter. The Basel III Capital Rules also permanently grandfathers as Tier 2 capital such trust preferred securities.

Note 27 – Stockholders’ equity

The Corporation has 30,000,000 shares of authorized preferred stock that may be issued in one or more series, and the shares of each series shall have such rights and preferences as shall be fixed by the Board of Directors when authorizing the issuance of that particular series. The Corporation’s shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013 consisted of:

 

   

6.375% non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, 2003 Series A, no par value, liquidation preference value of $25 per share. Holders on record of the 2003 Series A Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors of the Corporation or an authorized committee thereof, out of funds legally available, non-cumulative cash dividends at the annual rate per share of 6.375% of their liquidation preference value, or $0.1328125 per share per month. These shares of preferred stock are perpetual, nonconvertible, have no preferential rights to purchase any securities of the Corporation and are redeemable solely at the option of the Corporation with the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The redemption price per share is $25.00. The shares of 2003 Series A Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except for certain rights in instances when the Corporation does not pay dividends for a defined period. These shares are not subject to any sinking fund requirement. Cash dividends declared and paid on the 2003 Series A Preferred Stock amounted to $ 1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Outstanding shares of 2003 Series A Preferred Stock amounted to 885,726 at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

   

8.25% non-cumulative monthly income preferred stock, 2008 Series B, no par value, liquidation preference value of $25 per share. The shares of 2008 Series B Preferred Stock were issued in May 2008. Holders of record of the 2008 Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors of the Corporation or an authorized committee thereof, out of funds legally available, non-cumulative cash dividends at the annual rate per share of 8.25% of their liquidation preferences, or $0.171875 per share per month. These shares of preferred stock are perpetual, nonconvertible, have no preferential rights to purchase any securities of the Corporation and are redeemable solely at the option of the Corporation with the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System beginning on May 28, 2013. The redemption price per share is $25.50 from May 28, 2013 through May 28, 2014, $25.25 from May 28, 2014 through May 28, 2015 and $25.00 from May 28, 2015 and thereafter. Cash dividends declared and paid on the 2008 Series B Preferred Stock amounted to $ 2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Outstanding shares of 2008 Series B Preferred Stock amounted to 1,120,665 at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

262


As part of the Series C Preferred Stock transaction with the U.S. Treasury effected on December 5, 2008, the Corporation issued to the U.S. Treasury a warrant to purchase 2,093,284 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $67 per share. On July 23, 2014, the Corporation completed the repurchase of the outstanding warrant at a repurchase price of $3.0 million. With the completion of this transaction, the Corporation completed its exit from the TARP Capital Purchase Program.

The Corporation’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (the “NASDAQ”) under the symbol BPOP. The Corporation voluntarily delisted its 2003 Series A and 2008 Series B Preferred Stock from the NASDAQ effective October 8, 2009.

On May 29, 2012, the Corporation effected a 1-for-10 reverse split of its common stock previously approved by the Corporation’s stockholders on April 27, 2012. Upon the effectiveness of the reverse split, each 10 shares of authorized and outstanding common stock were reclassified and combined into one new share of common stock. Popular, Inc.’s common stock began trading on a split-adjusted basis on May 30, 2012. All share and per share information in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the 1-for-10 reverse stock split.

In connection with the reverse stock split, the Corporation amended its Restated Certificate of Incorporation to reduce the number of shares of its authorized common stock from 1,700,000,000 to 170,000,000.

The reverse stock split did not affect the par value of a share of the Corporation’s common stock.

At the effective date of the reverse stock split, the stated capital attributable to common stock on the Corporation’s consolidated statement of financial condition was reduced by dividing the amount of the stated capital prior to the reverse stock split by 10, and the additional paid-in capital (surplus) was credited with the amount by which the stated capital was reduced. This was also reflected retroactively for prior periods presented in the financial statements.

The Corporation’s common stock ranks junior to all series of preferred stock as to dividend rights and / or as to rights on liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Corporation. Dividends on each series of preferred stocks are payable if declared. The Corporation’s ability to declare or pay dividends on, or purchase, redeem or otherwise acquire, its common stock is subject to certain restrictions in the event that the Corporation fails to pay or set aside full dividends on the preferred stock for the latest dividend period. The ability of the Corporation to pay dividends in the future is limited by regulatory requirements and approval, the Corporation’s agreements with the U.S. Treasury, legal availability of funds, recent and projected financial results, capital levels and liquidity of the Corporation, general business conditions and other factors deemed relevant by the Corporation’s Board of Directors.

During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 the Corporation did not declare dividends on its common stock.

The Banking Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico requires that a minimum of 10% of BPPR’s net income for the year be transferred to a statutory reserve account until such statutory reserve equals the total of paid-in capital on common and preferred stock. Any losses incurred by a bank must first be charged to retained earnings and then to the reserve fund. Amounts credited to the reserve fund may not be used to pay dividends without the prior consent of the Puerto Rico Commissioner of Financial Institutions. The failure to maintain sufficient statutory reserves would preclude BPPR from paying dividends. BPPR’s statutory reserve fund amounted to $ 469 million at December 31, 2014 (2013 - $ 445 million; 2012 - $ 432 million). During 2014, $ 24 million was transferred to the statutory reserve account (2013 - $ 13 million, 2012 - $ 17 million). BPPR was in compliance with the statutory reserve requirement in 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

263


Note 28 – Regulatory capital requirements

The Corporation and its banking subsidiaries are subject to various regulatory capital requirements imposed by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can lead to certain mandatory and additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Corporation must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Corporation’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under US GAAP, regulatory reporting requirements, and reporting standards. The Corporation’s capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weighting, and other factors.

Rules adopted by the federal banking agencies, as applicable to the Corporation and its banking subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014, provide that a depository institution will be deemed to be well capitalized if it maintained a leverage ratio of at least 5%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of at least 6% and a total risk-based ratio of at least 10%. Management has determined that at December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Corporation exceeded all capital adequacy requirements to which it is subject.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, BPPR and BPNA were well-capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. At December 31, 2014, management believes that there were no conditions or events since the most recent notification from the Federal Reserve that could have changed the institution’s category.

The Corporation has been designated by the Federal Reserve Board as a Financial Holding Company (“FHC”) and is eligible to engage in certain financial activities permitted under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999.

The following tables present the Corporation’s risk-based capital and leverage ratios at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     Actual     Capital adequacy minimum
requirement
 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio  
     2014  

Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

          

Corporation

   $ 4,122,238         19.41   $ 1,698,712         8

BPPR

     2,973,500         17.00        1,399,664         8   

BPNA

     1,216,065         35.77        271,952         8   

Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

          

Corporation

   $ 3,849,891         18.13   $ 849,356         4

BPPR

     2,749,051         15.71        699,832         4   

BPNA

     1,182,899         34.80        135,976         4   

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets):

          

Corporation

   $ 3,849,891         11.94   $ 967,505         3
          1,290,007         4   

BPPR

     2,749,051         10.63        775,566         3   
          1,034,089         4   

BPNA

     1,182,899         20.01        177,376         3   
          236,502         4   

 

264


     Actual     Capital adequacy minimum
requirement
 

(Dollars in thousands)

   Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio  
     2013  

Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

          

Corporation

   $ 4,761,555        20.42   $ 1,865,494        8

BPPR

     2,607,018        14.76       1,413,292        8  

BPNA

     1,400,740        25.47       439,908        8  

Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

          

Corporation

   $ 4,464,742        19.15   $ 932,747        4

BPPR

     2,381,347        13.48       706,646        4  

BPNA

     1,331,471        24.21       219,954        4  

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets):

          

Corporation

   $ 4,464,742        12.85   $ 1,042,384        3
          1,389,845        4  

BPPR

     2,381,347        9.21       775,562        3  
          1,034,083        4  

BPNA

     1,331,471        15.92       250,931        3  
          334,575        4  

The following table presents the minimum amounts and ratios for the Corporation’s banks to be categorized as well-capitalized under prompt corrective action.

 

     2014     2013  

(Dollars in thousands)

   Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio  

Total Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

          

BPPR

   $ 1,749,580        10   $ 1,766,615        10

BPNA

     339,939        10       549,885        10  

Tier I Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets):

          

BPPR

   $ 1,049,748        6   $ 1,059,969        6

BPNA

     203,964        6       329,931        6  

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets):

          

BPPR

   $ 1,292,611        5   $ 1,292,604        5

BPNA

     295,627        5       418,219        5  

In 2013, the Federal Reserve issued final Basel III capital rules that require banking organizations subject to the standardized approach, such as the Corporation and its banking subsidiaries, to meet revised minimum regulatory capital ratios beginning January 1, 2015, and begin the transition period for the revised definitions of regulatory capital and the revised regulatory capital adjustments and deductions, as well as comply with the standardized approach for determining risk-weighted assets.

 

265


Furthermore, the final Basel III capital rules require the phase out of non-qualifying Tier 1 capital instruments such as trust preferred securities. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation had $427 million in trust preferred securities outstanding. Beginning on January 1, 2015, approximately $320 million in principal amount of the trust preferred securities will no longer qualify for Tier 1 capital treatment, but instead will qualify for Tier 2 capital treatment. The Corporation anticipates that, by January 1, 2016, all $427 million of its outstanding trust preferred securities will lose Tier 1 capital treatment, and will be reclassified to Tier 2 capital.

Beginning January 1, 2016, the Basel III final rules introduce a phase-in capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets that is effectively layered on top of the minimum capital risk-based ratios, which places restrictions on the amount of retained earnings that may be used for distributions or discretionary bonus payments as risk-based capital ratios approach their respective “adequately capitalized minimums.”

The following table presents the capital requirements for a standardized approach banking organization under Basel III final rules.

 

                 Minimum Capital Plus Capital Conservation Buffer  
     Minimum Capital     Well-Capitalized     2016     2017     2018     2019  

Common Equity Tier 1 to Risk-Weighted Assets

     4.5     6.5     5.125     5.750     6.375     7.000

Tier 1 Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets

     6.0       8.0       6.625       7.250       7.875       8.500  

Total Capital to Risk-Weighted Assets

     8.0       10.0       8.625       9.250       9.875       10.500  

Leverage Ratio

     4.0       5.0       N/A        N/A        N/A        N/A   

Note 29 – Other comprehensive loss

The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

    

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss by Component [1]

 
          Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

        2014      2013      2012  

Foreign currency translation

  

Beginning Balance

   $ (36,099    $ (31,277    $ (28,829
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other comprehensive gain (loss) before reclassifications

  (4,451   (4,822   (2,448

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)

  7,718     —       —    
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net change

  3,267     (4,822   (2,448
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ (32,832 $ (36,099 $ (31,277
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans

Beginning Balance

$ (104,302 $ (225,846 $ (216,058
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications

  (98,015   104,272     (27,699

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for amortization of net losses

  (5,188   17,272     18,051  

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income for amortization of prior service cost

  2,318     —       (140
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net change

  (100,885   121,544     (9,788
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ (205,187 $ (104,302 $ (225,846
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

266


Unrealized net holding gains (losses) on investments

Beginning Balance

$ (48,344 $ 154,568   $ 203,078  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other comprehensive gain (loss) before reclassifications

  55,987     (201,119   (50,204

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

  822     (1,793   1,694  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net change

  56,809     (202,912   (48,510
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ 8,465   $ (48,344 $ 154,568  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Unrealized net gains (losses) on cash flow hedges

Beginning Balance

$ —     $ (313 $ (739
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications

  (4,034   1,436     (9,457

Amounts reclassified from other accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

  3,716     (1,123   9,883  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net change

  (318   313     426  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Ending balance

$ (318 $ —     $ (313
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ (229,872 $ (188,745 $ (102,868
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1]

All amounts presented are net of tax.

The following table presents the amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.

 

    

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

 
     Affected Line Item in the    Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

  

Consolidated Statements of Operations

   2014      2013      2012  

Foreign currency translation

           

Cumulative translation adjustment reclassified into earnings

  

Other operating income

   $ (7,718    $ —        $ —    
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total before tax

  (7,718   —       —    
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income tax (expense) benefit

  —       —       —    
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total net of tax

$ (7,718 $ —     $ —    
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Adjustment of pension and postretirement benefit plans

Amortization of net losses

Personnel costs

$ 8,505   $ (24,674 $ (25,159

Amortization of prior service cost

Personnel costs

  (3,800   —       200  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total before tax

  4,705     (24,674   (24,959
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income tax benefit

  (1,835   7,402     7,048  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total net of tax

$ 2,870   $ (17,272 $ (17,911
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

267


Unrealized holding gains on investments

Realized gain (loss) on sale of securities

Net gain (loss) on sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities

$ (870 $ 2,110   $ (1,707
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total before tax

  (870   2,110      (1,707

Income tax benefit (expense)

  48     (317   13  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total net of tax

$ (822 $ 1,793   $ (1,694
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Unrealized net losses on cash flow hedges

Forward contracts

Mortgage banking activities

$ (6,091 $ 1,839   $ (14,119
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total before tax

  (6,091   1,839     (14,119
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income tax benefit (expense)

  2,375     (716   4,236  
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total net of tax

$ (3,716 $ 1,123   $ (9,883
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total reclassification adjustments, net of tax

$ (9,386 $ (14,356 $ (29,488
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 30 – Guarantees

The Corporation has obligations upon the occurrence of certain events under financial guarantees provided in certain contractual agreements as summarized below.

The Corporation issues financial standby letters of credit and has risk participation in standby letters of credit issued by other financial institutions, in each case to guarantee the performance of various customers to third parties. If the customers failed to meet its financial or performance obligation to the third party under the terms of the contract, then, upon their request, the Corporation would be obligated to make the payment to the guaranteed party. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation recorded a liability of $0.4 million (December 31, 2013 - $0.4 million), which represents the unamortized balance of the obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit. In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 460, the Corporation recognizes at fair value the obligation at inception of the standby letters of credit. The fair value approximates the fee received from the customer for issuing such commitments. These fees are deferred and are recognized over the commitment period. The contracts amount in standby letters of credit outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, shown in Note 31, represent the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation could be required to make under the guarantees in the event of nonperformance by the customers. These standby letters of credit are used by the customers as a credit enhancement and typically expire without being drawn upon. The Corporation’s standby letters of credit are generally secured, and in the event of nonperformance by the customers, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral provided, which normally includes cash, marketable securities, real estate, receivables, and others. Management does not anticipate any material losses related to these instruments.

Also, the Corporation securitized mortgage loans into guaranteed mortgage-backed securities subject to lifetime credit recourse on the loans that serve as collateral for the mortgage-backed securities. Also, from time to time, the Corporation may sell, in bulk sale transactions, residential mortgage loans and Small Business Administration (“SBA”) commercial loans subject to credit recourse or to certain representations and warranties from the Corporation to the purchaser. These representations and warranties may relate, for example, to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation, collateral, prepayment and early payment defaults. The Corporation may be required to repurchase the loans under the credit recourse agreements or representation and warranties.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation serviced $2.1 billion (December 31, 2013 - $2.5 billion) in residential mortgage loans subject to credit recourse provisions, principally loans associated with FNMA and FHLMC residential mortgage loan securitization programs. In the event of any customer default, pursuant to the credit recourse provided, the Corporation is required to repurchase the loan or reimburse the third party investor for the incurred loss. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Corporation would be required to make under the recourse arrangements in the event of nonperformance by the borrowers is equivalent to the total outstanding balance of the residential mortgage loans serviced with recourse and interest, if applicable. During 2014, the Corporation repurchased approximately $ 89 million of unpaid principal balance in mortgage loans subject to the credit recourse provisions (2013 - $ 126 million). In the event of nonperformance by the borrower, the Corporation has rights to the underlying collateral securing the mortgage loan. The Corporation suffers losses on these loans when the proceeds from a foreclosure sale of the property underlying a defaulted mortgage loan are less than the outstanding principal balance of the loan plus any uncollected interest advanced and the costs of holding and disposing the related property. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s liability established to cover the estimated credit loss exposure related to loans sold or serviced with credit recourse amounted to $ 59 million (December 31, 2013 - $ 41 million). The following table shows the changes in the Corporation’s liability of estimated losses from these credit recourses agreements, included in the consolidated statements of financial condition during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Balance as of beginning of period

   $ 41,463      $ 51,673  

Provision for recourse liability

     41,312        21,793  

Net charge-offs / terminations

     (23,337      (32,003
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance as of end of period

$ 59,438   $ 41,463  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

268


The probable losses to be absorbed under the credit recourse arrangements are recorded as a liability when the loans are sold and are updated by accruing or reversing expense (categorized in the line item “adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold” in the consolidated statements of operations) throughout the life of the loan, as necessary, when additional relevant information becomes available. The methodology used to estimate the recourse liability is a function of the recourse arrangements given and considers a variety of factors, which include actual defaults and historical loss experience, foreclosure rate, estimated future defaults and the probability that a loan would be delinquent. Statistical methods are used to estimate the recourse liability. Expected loss rates are applied to different loan segmentations. The expected loss, which represents the amount expected to be lost on a given loan, considers the probability of default and loss severity. The probability of default represents the probability that a loan in good standing would become 90 days delinquent within the following twelve-month period. Regression analysis quantifies the relationship between the default event and loan-specific characteristics, including credit scores, loan-to-value ratios, and loan aging, among others.

When the Corporation sells or securitizes mortgage loans, it generally makes customary representations and warranties regarding the characteristics of the loans sold. The Corporation’s mortgage operations in Puerto Rico group conforming mortgage loans into pools which are exchanged for FNMA and GNMA mortgage-backed securities, which are generally sold to private investors, or are sold directly to FNMA or other private investors for cash. As required under the government agency programs, quality review procedures are performed by the Corporation to ensure that asset guideline qualifications are met. To the extent the loans do not meet specified characteristics, the Corporation may be required to repurchase such loans or indemnify for losses and bear any subsequent loss related to the loans. Repurchases under BPPR’s representation and warranty arrangements in which the Corporation is obligated to repurchase the loans amounted to approximately $ 2.2 million in unpaid principal balance with losses amounting to $ 1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 ($ 4.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, during the year ended December 31, 2013). A substantial amount of these loans reinstate to performing status or have mortgage insurance, and thus the ultimate losses on the loans are not deemed significant.

As discussed on Note 4 – Discontinued Operations, on November 8, 2014, the Corporation completed the sale of the California regional operations. In connection with this transaction, the Corporation agreed to provide, subject to certain limitations, customary indemnification to the purchaser, including with respect to certain pre-closing liabilities and violations of representations and warranties. The Corporation also agreed to indemnify the purchaser for up to 1.5% of credit losses on transferred loans for a period of two years after the closing. Pursuant to this indemnification provision, the Corporation’s maximum exposure is approximately $16.0 million. The Corporation recognized a reserve of approximately $2.2 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. This reserve is included within the liabilities from discontinued operations.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representation and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of non-performing mortgage loans. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $16.3 million. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $3.0 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. BPPR’s obligations under this clause end one year after the closing except to any claim asserted prior to such termination date. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation has a reserve balance of $2.8 million to cover claims received from the purchaser, which are currently being evaluated.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2013, the Corporation established a reserve for certain specific representation and warranties made in connection with BPPR’s sale of commercial and construction loans, and commercial and single family real estate owned. The purchaser’s sole remedy under the indemnity clause is to seek monetary damages from BPPR, for a maximum of $18.0 million.

 

269


BPPR is not required to repurchase any of the assets. BPPR recognized a reserve of approximately $10.7 million, representing its best estimate of the loss that would be incurred in connection with this indemnification. During the quarter ended March 31, 2014, the Corporation released $2.0 million based on an evaluation of claims received under this clause. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation has a reserve balance of $7.4 million to cover claims received from the purchaser, which are currently being evaluated.

The following table presents the changes in the Corporation’s liability for estimated losses associated with the indemnifications and representations and warranties related to loans sold by BPPR for during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Balance as of beginning of period

   $ 19,277      $ 7,587  

Additions for new sales

     —          13,747  

Provision (reversal) for representation and warranties

     (712      (332

Net charge-offs

     (2,606      (1,725
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance as of end of period

$ 15,959   $ 19,277  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

In addition, at December 31, 2014, the Corporation has reserves for customary representation and warranties related to loans sold by its U.S. subsidiary E-LOAN prior to 2009. These loans had been sold to investors on a servicing released basis subject to certain representation and warranties. Although the risk of loss or default was generally assumed by the investors, the Corporation made certain representations relating to borrower creditworthiness, loan documentation and collateral, which if not correct, may result in requiring the Corporation to repurchase the loans or indemnify investors for any related losses associated to these loans. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s reserve for estimated losses from such representation and warranty arrangements amounted to $ 5 million, which was included as part of other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial condition (December 31, 2013 - $ 7 million). E-LOAN is no longer originating and selling loans since the subsidiary ceased these activities in 2008 and most of the outstanding agreements with major counterparties were settled during 2010 and 2011.

Servicing agreements relating to the mortgage-backed securities programs of FNMA and GNMA, and to mortgage loans sold or serviced to certain other investors, including FHLMC, require the Corporation to advance funds to make scheduled payments of principal, interest, taxes and insurance, if such payments have not been received from the borrowers. At December 31, 2014, the Corporation serviced $15.6 billion in mortgage loans for third-parties, including the loans serviced with credit recourse (December 31, 2013 - $16.3 billion). The Corporation generally recovers funds advanced pursuant to these arrangements from the mortgage owner, from liquidation proceeds when the mortgage loan is foreclosed or, in the case of FHA/VA loans, under the applicable FHA and VA insurance and guarantees programs. However, in the meantime, the Corporation must absorb the cost of the funds it advances during the time the advance is outstanding. The Corporation must also bear the costs of attempting to collect on delinquent and defaulted mortgage loans. In addition, if a defaulted loan is not cured, the mortgage loan would be canceled as part of the foreclosure proceedings and the Corporation would not receive any future servicing income with respect to that loan. At December 31, 2014, the outstanding balance of funds advanced by the Corporation under such mortgage loan servicing agreements was approximately $36 million (December 31, 2013 - $29 million). To the extent the mortgage loans underlying the Corporation’s servicing portfolio experience increased delinquencies, the Corporation would be required to dedicate additional cash resources to comply with its obligation to advance funds as well as incur additional administrative costs related to increases in collection efforts.

Popular, Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) fully and unconditionally guarantees certain borrowing obligations issued by certain of its wholly-owned consolidated subsidiaries amounting to $ 0.2 billion at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $ 0.2 billion). In addition, at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, PIHC fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a subordinated basis $ 0.4 billion and $ 1.4 billion, respectively, of capital securities (trust preferred securities) issued by wholly-owned issuing trust entities to the extent set forth in the applicable guarantee agreement. Refer to Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements for further information on the trust preferred securities.

 

270


Note 31 – Commitments and contingencies

Off-balance sheet risk

The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk in the normal course of business to meet the financial needs of its customers. These financial instruments include loan commitments, letters of credit, and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

The Corporation’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual notional amounts of those instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making these commitments and conditional obligations as it does for those reflected on the consolidated statements of financial condition.

Financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk, whose contract amounts represent potential credit risk as of the end of the periods presented were as follows:

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Commitments to extend credit:

     

Credit card lines

   $ 4,450,284      $ 4,594,676  

Commercial lines of credit

     2,415,843        2,569,377  

Other unused credit commitments

     269,225        326,874  

Commercial letters of credit

     2,820        3,059  

Standby letters of credit

     46,362        78,948  

Commitments to originate or fund mortgage loans

     25,919        47,722  

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation maintained a reserve of approximately $13 million for potential losses associated with unfunded loan commitments related to commercial and consumer lines of credit, as compared to $7 million at December 31, 2013.

Other commitments

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation also maintained other non-credit commitments for approximately $9 million, primarily for the acquisition of other investments, as compared to $10 million at December 31, 2013.

Business concentration

Since the Corporation’s business activities are currently concentrated primarily in Puerto Rico, its results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon the general trends of the Puerto Rico economy and, in particular, the residential and commercial real estate markets. The concentration of the Corporation’s operations in Puerto Rico exposes it to greater risk than other banking companies with a wider geographic base. Its asset and revenue composition by geographical area is presented in Note 45 to the consolidated financial statements.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s direct exposure to the Puerto Rico government and its instrumentalities and municipalities amounted to $ 1.0 billion, of which approximately $ 811 million is outstanding ($1.2 billion and $950 million at December 31, 2013). Of the amount outstanding, $ 689 million consists of loans and $ 122 million are securities ($789 million and $161 million at December 31, 2013). Of this amount, $ 336 million represents obligations from the Government of Puerto Rico and public corporations that are either collateralized loans or obligations that have a specific source of income or revenues identified for their repayment ($527 million at December 31, 2013). Some of these obligations consist of senior and subordinated loans to public corporations that obtain revenues from rates charged for services or products, such as public utilities. Public corporations have varying degrees of independence from the central Government and many receive appropriations or other payments from it. The remaining $ 475 million represents obligations from various municipalities in Puerto Rico for which, in most cases, the good faith, credit and unlimited taxing power of the applicable municipality has been pledged to their repayment ($423 million at December 31, 2013). These municipalities are required by law to levy special property taxes in such amounts as shall be required for the payment of all of its general obligation bonds and loans. These loans have seniority to the payment of operating cost and expenses of the municipality.

 

271


In addition, at December 31, 2014, the Corporation had $370 million in indirect exposure to loans or securities that are payable by non-governmental entities, but which carry a government guarantee to cover any shortfall in collateral in the event of borrower default ($360 million at December 31, 2013). These included $289 million in residential mortgage loans that are guaranteed by the Puerto Rico Housing Finance Authority (December 31, 2013 - $274 million). These mortgage loans are secured by the underlying properties and the guarantees serve to cover shortfalls in collateral in the event of a borrower default. Also, the Corporation had $49 million in Puerto Rico pass-through housing bonds backed by FNMA, GNMA or residential loans CMO’s, and $32 million of industrial development notes ($52 million and $34 million at December 31, 2013).

Other contingencies

As indicated in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, as part of the loss sharing agreements related to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, the Corporation agreed to make a true-up payment to the FDIC on the date that is 45 days following the last day of the final shared loss month, or upon the final disposition of all covered assets under the loss sharing agreements in the event losses on the loss sharing agreements fail to reach expected levels. The fair value of the true-up payment obligation was estimated at $ 129 million at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $ 128 million).

Legal Proceedings

The nature of Popular’s business ordinarily results in a certain number of claims, litigation, investigations, and legal and administrative cases and proceedings. When the Corporation determines it has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted, it vigorously defends itself. The Corporation will consider the settlement of cases (including cases where it has meritorious defenses) when, in management’s judgment, it is in the best interest of both the Corporation and its shareholders to do so.

On at least a quarterly basis, Popular assesses its liabilities and contingencies in connection with outstanding legal proceedings utilizing the latest information available. For matters where it is probable that the Corporation will incur a material loss and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the Corporation establishes an accrual for the loss. Once established, the accrual is adjusted on at least a quarterly basis as appropriate to reflect any relevant developments. For matters where a material loss is not probable or the amount of the loss cannot be estimated, no accrual is established.

In certain cases, exposure to loss exists in excess of the accrual to the extent such loss is reasonably possible, but not probable. Management believes and estimates that the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses (with respect to those matters where such limits may be determined, in excess of amounts accrued), for current legal proceedings ranges from $0 to approximately $39 million as of December 31, 2014. For certain other cases, management cannot reasonably estimate the possible loss at this time. Any estimate involves significant judgment, given the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many of them are currently in preliminary stages), the existence of multiple defendants in several of the current proceedings whose share of liability has yet to be determined, the numerous unresolved issues in many of the proceedings, and the inherent uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, management’s estimate will change from time-to-time, and actual losses may be more or less than the current estimate.

While the final outcome of legal proceedings is inherently uncertain, based on information currently available, advice of counsel, and available insurance coverage, management believes that the amount it has already accrued is adequate and any incremental liability arising from the Corporation’s legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Corporation’s consolidated financial position as a whole. However, in the event of unexpected future developments, it is possible that the ultimate resolution of these matters, if unfavorable, may be material to the Corporation’s consolidated financial position in a particular period.

Ongoing Class Action Litigation

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”) and Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”) are currently defendants in various class action lawsuits:

On November 21, 2012, BPNA was served with a putative class action complaint captioned Josefina Valle, et al. v. Popular Community Bank, filed in the New York State Supreme Court (New York County). Plaintiffs, existing BPNA customers, allege among other things that BPNA has engaged in unfair and deceptive acts and trade practices in connection with the assessment of overdraft fees and payment processing on consumer deposit accounts. The complaint further alleges that BPNA improperly disclosed its consumer overdraft policies and, additionally, that the overdraft rates and fees assessed by BPNA violate New York’s usury laws. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, including punitive damages, interest, disbursements, and attorneys’ fees and costs.

 

272


BPNA removed the case to federal court (S.D.N.Y.) and plaintiffs subsequently filed a motion to remand the action to state court, which the Court granted on August 6, 2013. A motion to dismiss was filed on September 9, 2013. On October 25, 2013, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint seeking to limit the putative class to New York account holders. A motion to dismiss the amended complaint was filed in February 2014. In August 2014, the Court entered an order granting in part BPNA’s motion to dismiss. The sole surviving claim relates to BPNA’s item processing policy. On September 10, 2014, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint to correct certain deficiencies noted in the court’s decision and order. BPNA subsequently filed a motion in opposition to plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend and further sought to compel arbitration. The matter has been stayed pending a ruling on such motions.

Between December 2013 and January 2014, BPPR, BPNA and Popular, Inc., along with two executive officers, were served with a putative class action complaint captioned Neysha Quiles et al. v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico et al. Plaintiffs essentially alleged that they and others, who have been employed by the Defendants as “bank tellers” and other similarly titled positions, were generally paid only for scheduled work time, rather than time actually worked. The Complaint sought to maintain a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) on behalf of all individuals who were employed or were currently employed by the Defendants in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, New York, New Jersey, Florida, California, and Illinois as hourly paid, non-exempt, bank tellers or other similarly titled positions at any time during the past three years and alleged the following claims under the FLSA against all Defendants: (i) failure to pay overtime premiums; and (ii) that the failure to pay was willful. Similar claims were brought under Puerto Rico law on behalf of all individuals who were employed or are currently employed by BPPR in Puerto Rico as hourly paid, non-exempt, bank tellers or other similarly titled positions at any time during the past three years. On January 31, 2014, the Popular defendants filed an answer to the complaint. On February 24, 2014, the parties reached an agreement to dismiss the complaint against BPNA and the named BPNA executive officer without prejudice. On January 9, 2015, plaintiffs submitted a motion for conditional class certification, which BPPR opposed. On February 18, 2015, the Court entered an order whereby it granted plaintiffs’ request for conditional certification of the FLSA action.

On May 5, 2014, a putative class action captioned Nora Fernandez, et al. v. UBS, et al . was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of investors in 23 Puerto Rico closed-end investment companies against various UBS entities, BPPR and Popular Securities. UBS Financial Services Incorporated of Puerto Rico is the sponsor and co-sponsor of all 23 funds, while BPPR was co-sponsor, together with UBS, of nine (9) of those funds. The plaintiffs allege breach of fiduciary duties, aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract against all defendants. The complaint seeks unspecified damages, including disgorgement of fees and attorneys’ fees. On May 30, 2014, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their class action in the SDNY and on that same date, they filed a virtually identical complaint in the US District Court for the District of Puerto Rico (USDC-PR) and requested that the case be consolidated with the matter of In re: UBS Financial Services Securities Litigation , a class action currently pending before the USDC-PR in which neither BPPR nor Popular Securities are parties. The UBS defendants filed an opposition to the consolidation request and moved to transfer the case back to the SDNY on the ground that the relevant agreements between the parties contain a choice of forum clause, with New York as the selected forum. The Popular defendants joined this motion. By order dated January 30, 2015, the court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate. The motion to transfer remains pending to date.

On May 6, 2014, a putative class action captioned David Alvarez, et al. v. Banco Popular North America was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles. Plaintiffs generally assert that BPNA has engaged in purported violations of §2954.8(a) of the California Civil Code and §17200 et seq. of the California Business Professions Code, which allegedly require financial institutions that make loans secured by certain types of real property located within the state of California to pay interest to borrowers on impound account deposits at a statutory rate of not less than two percent (2%). Plaintiffs maintain that BPNA has not paid interest on such deposits and demand that BPNA be enjoined from engaging in further violations of these provisions and pay an unspecified amount of damages sufficient to repay the unpaid interest on these deposits. PHH Corporation, which acquired the loans at issue in this complaint, has tentatively agreed to indemnify and tender a defense on behalf of BPNA. The court recently entered an order staying all substantive activity, including any responsive pleading, until the initial conference scheduled for August 22, 2014. The parties have subsequently reached an agreement in principle. The settlement terms – which do not contemplate a payment by BPNA – are currently being negotiated.

On October 7, 2014, BPNA was served with a putative class action complaint captioned Josefina Valle, et al. v. BPNA, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York . The complaint names the same plaintiffs who filed the above-described overdraft fee class action suit. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that BPNA engages in unfair and deceptive acts and trade practices relative to the assessment of ATM fees on ATM transactions initialed at Allpoint branded ATMs. The complaint further alleges that BPNA is in violation of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act and Regulation E with respect to ATM fees. On December 2, 2014, BPNA filed a motion to compel arbitration, which plaintiffs opposed. On February 2, 2015, the court entered an opinion and order granting defendant’s motion to compel arbitration. On February 23, 2015, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit demanding that the court reverse the district court’s ruling.

 

273


On October 3, 2014, BPNA received notice of a potential class action submitted by two former assistant branch managers. The purported action alleges various wage and hour violations arising from what they contend is an improper job classification under the FLSA and applicable state law equivalents. In December 2014, BPNA accepted plaintiffs’ offer to mediate this dispute, and mediation took place on February 19, 2015. As a result of the mediation, the parties entered into an agreement in principle to settle this claim. Under the terms of the agreement in principle, subject to certain customary conditions including court approval of a final settlement agreement in consideration for the full settlement and release of all defendants, defendant will pay the amount of $800,000.

Other Matters

The volatility in prices and declines in value that Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end investment companies that invest primarily in Puerto Rico municipal bonds have experienced since August 2013 have led to regulatory inquiries, customer complaints and arbitrations for most broker-dealers in Puerto Rico, including Popular Securities LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation (“Popular Securities”). Popular Securities has received customer complaints and is named as a respondent (among other broker-dealers) in 39 arbitration proceedings with aggregate claimed damages of approximately $99 million, including one arbitration with claimed damages of $78 million in which two other Puerto Rico broker-dealers are co-defendants. The proceedings are in their early stages and it is the view of the Corporation that Popular Securities has meritorious defenses to the claims asserted. An adverse result in the matters described above could have a material and adverse effect on Popular Securities.

Also, as previously disclosed, in February 2014, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) notified Popular Securities that it was conducting an examination of broker-dealers in Puerto Rico, including Popular Securities, with respect to the sale of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end investment companies that invest primarily in Puerto Rico municipal bonds. In December 2014, FINRA and Popular Securities reached a definitive agreement, in the form of an Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (“AWC”) Letter, in connection with the latter’s purported violations of NASD Rules 3010(a) and (B) and FINRA Rule 2010. Without admitting or denying those allegations, Popular Securities agreed to the payment of a $125,000 fine.

Other Significant Proceedings

As described under “Note 13 – FDIC loss share asset and true-up payment obligation”, in connection with the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction, on April 30, 2010, BPPR entered into loss share agreements with the FDIC with respect to the covered loans and other real estate owned that it acquired in the transaction. Pursuant to the terms of the loss share agreements, the FDIC’s obligation to reimburse BPPR for losses with respect to covered assets begins with the first dollar of loss incurred. The FDIC reimburses BPPR for 80% of losses with respect to covered assets, and BPPR reimburses the FDIC for 80% of recoveries with respect to losses for which the FDIC paid 80% reimbursement under those loss share agreements. The loss share agreements contain specific terms and conditions regarding the management of the covered assets that BPPR must follow in order to receive reimbursement for losses from the FDIC. BPPR believes that it has complied with such terms and conditions. The loss share agreement applicable to the commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans described below provides for loss sharing by the FDIC through the quarter ending June 30, 2015 and for reimbursement to the FDIC through the quarter ending June 30, 2018.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2010 through March 31, 2012, BPPR received reimbursement for loss-share claims submitted to the FDIC, including charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. When BPPR submitted its shared-loss claim in connection with the June 30, 2012 quarter, however, the FDIC refused to reimburse BPPR for a portion of the claim because of a difference related to the methodology for the computation of charge-offs for certain commercial late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and OREO. In accordance with the terms of the commercial loss share agreement, BPPR applied a methodology for charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans that conforms to its regulatory supervisory criteria and is calculated in accordance with BPPR’s charge-off policy for non-covered assets. The FDIC stated that it believed that BPPR should use a different methodology for those charge-offs. Notwithstanding the FDIC’s refusal to reimburse BPPR for certain shared-loss claims, BPPR had continued to calculate shared-loss claims for quarters subsequent to June 30, 2012 in accordance with its charge-off policy for non-covered assets.

 

274


BPPR’s loss share agreements with the FDIC specify that disputes can be submitted to arbitration before a review board under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. On July 31, 2013, BPPR filed a statement of claims with the American Arbitration Association requesting that the review board determine certain matters relating to the loss-share claims under its commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC, including that the review board award BPPR the amounts owed under its unpaid quarterly certificates. The statement of claim also included requests for reimbursement of certain valuation adjustments for discounts to appraised values, costs to sell troubled assets and other items. The review board was comprised of one arbitrator appointed by BPPR, one arbitrator appointed by the FDIC and a third arbitrator selected by agreement of those arbitrators.

On October 17, 2014, BPPR and the FDIC settled all claims and counterclaims that had been submitted to the review board. The settlement provides for an agreed valuation methodology for reimbursement of charge-offs for late stage real-estate-collateral-dependent loans and resulting OREO. Although the terms of the settlement could delay the timing of reimbursement of certain loss-share claims from the FDIC, the settlement is not expected to have a material adverse impact on BPPR’s current estimate of expected reimbursable losses for the covered portfolio through the end of the commercial loss share agreement in the quarter ending June 30, 2015.

As of December 31, 2014, BPPR had unreimbursed losses and expenses of $299.4 million under the commercial loss share agreement with the FDIC. On January 16, 2015, BPPR received reimbursement of $130.2 million from the FDIC covering claims filed prior to December 31, 2014. Taking into consideration this payment and claims submitted through that date, the total unreimbursed losses totaled $169.2 million, of which $30.1 million was submitted to the FDIC on January 30, 2015. BPPR continues to work on processing claims, including those which had previously not been reimbursed by the FDIC and expects to complete this process before the expiration of BPPR’s ability to submit claims under the commercial loss share agreement in the quarter ending June 30, 2015. After giving effect to the claim submitted on January 30, 2015, the amount of claims pending to be submitted for reimbursement to the FDIC amounted to $139.1 million.

Pending Disputes with the FDIC

On November 25, 2014, the FDIC notified BPPR that it (a) would not reimburse BPPR under the commercial loss share agreement for a $66.6 million loss claim on eight related real estate loans that BPPR restructured and consolidated (collectively, the “Disputed Asset”), and (b) would no longer treat the Disputed Asset as a “Shared-Loss Asset” under the commercial loss share agreement. The FDIC alleged that BPPR’s restructure and modification of the underlying loans did not constitute a “Permitted Amendment” under the commercial loss share agreement, thereby causing the bank to breach Article III of the commercial loss share agreement.

BPPR disagrees with the FDIC’s determinations relating to the Disputed Asset, and accordingly, on December 19, 2014, delivered to the FDIC a notice of dispute under the commercial loss share agreement.

The commercial loss share agreement provides that certain disputes be submitted to arbitration before a review board, to include two party-appointed members, under the commercial arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association. BPPR and the FDIC have agreed that, if they are not able to resolve their disputes concerning the Disputed Asset through negotiation prior to March 13, 2015, they will name their respective party-appointed members of the review board on March 16, 2015.

To the extent we are not able to successfully resolve this matter through negotiation or the arbitration process described above, a write-off in the amount of approximately $53.3 million of the aforementioned pending claims would be recorded.

In addition, in November and December 2014, BPPR proposed separate portfolio sales to the FDIC. The FDIC has refused to consent to either sale, stating that those sales did not represent best efforts to maximize collections on Shared-Loss Assets under the commercial loss share agreement. We dispute that characterization, and negotiations are continuing.

No assurance can be given that we will receive reimbursement from the FDIC with respect to the foregoing items, which could require us to make a material adjustment to the value of our loss share asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

The loss share agreement applicable to single-family residential mortgage loans provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for ten years (ending on June 30, 2020), and the loss share agreement applicable to commercial and other assets provides for FDIC loss sharing and BPPR reimbursement to the FDIC for five years (ending on June 30, 2015), with

 

275


additional recovery sharing for three years thereafter. As of December 31, 2014, the carrying value of covered loans approximated $2.5 billion, of which approximately 64% pertained to commercial loans, 3% to construction loans, 32% to mortgage loans and 1% to consumer loans. To the extent that estimated losses on covered loans are not realized before the expiration of the applicable loss share agreement, such losses would not be subject to reimbursement from the FDIC and, accordingly, would require us to make a material reduction in the value of our loss share asset and the related true up payment obligation to the FDIC and could have a material adverse effect on our financial results for the period in which such adjustment is taken.

 

276


Note 32 – Non-consolidated variable interest entities

The Corporation is involved with four statutory trusts which it established to issue trust preferred securities to the public. Also, it established Popular Capital Trust III for the purpose of exchanging Series C preferred stock shares held by the U.S. Treasury for trust preferred securities issued by this trust. These trusts are deemed to be variable interest entities (“VIEs”) since the equity investors at risk have no substantial decision-making rights. The Corporation does not hold any variable interest in the trusts, and therefore, cannot be the trusts’ primary beneficiary. Furthermore, the Corporation concluded that it did not hold a controlling financial interest in these trusts since the decisions of the trusts are predetermined through the trust documents and the guarantee of the trust preferred securities is irrelevant since in substance the sponsor is guaranteeing its own debt.

Also, the Corporation is involved with various special purpose entities mainly in guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions, including GNMA, FNMA and FHLMC. These special purpose entities are deemed to be VIEs since they lack equity investments at risk. The Corporation’s continuing involvement in these guaranteed loan securitizations includes owning certain beneficial interests in the form of securities as well as the servicing rights retained. The Corporation is not required to provide additional financial support to any of the variable interest entities to which it has transferred the financial assets. The mortgage-backed securities, to the extent retained, are classified in the Corporation’s consolidated statements of financial condition as available-for-sale or trading securities. The Corporation concluded that, essentially, these entities (FNMA, GNMA, and FHLMC) control the design of their respective VIEs, dictate the quality and nature of the collateral, require the underlying insurance, set the servicing standards via the servicing guides and can change them at will, and can remove a primary servicer with cause, and without cause in the case of FNMA and FHLMC. Moreover, through their guarantee obligations, agencies (FNMA, GNMA, and FHLMC) have the obligation to absorb losses that could be potentially significant to the VIE.

ASU 2009-17 requires that an ongoing primary beneficiary assessment should be made to determine whether the Corporation is the primary beneficiary of any of the VIEs it is involved with. The conclusion on the assessment of these trusts and guaranteed mortgage securitization transactions has not changed since their initial evaluation. The Corporation concluded that it is still not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs, and therefore, these VIEs are not required to be consolidated in the Corporation’s financial statements at December 31, 2014.

The Corporation holds variable interests in these VIEs in the form of agency mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations, including those securities originated by the Corporation and those acquired from third parties. Additionally, the Corporation holds agency mortgage-backed securities, agency collateralized mortgage obligations and private label collateralized mortgage obligations issued by third party VIEs in which it has no other form of continuing involvement. Refer to Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on the debt securities outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, which are classified as available-for-sale and trading securities in the Corporation’s consolidated statement of financial condition. In addition, the Corporation may retain the right to service the transferred loans in those government-sponsored special purpose entities (“SPEs”) and may also purchase the right to service loans in other government-sponsored SPEs that were transferred to those SPEs by a third-party. Pursuant to ASC Subtopic 810-10, the servicing fees that the Corporation receives for its servicing role are considered variable interests in the VIEs since the servicing fees are subordinated to the principal and interest that first needs to be paid to the mortgage-backed securities’ investors and to the guaranty fees that need to be paid to the federal agencies.

 

277


The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets related to the Corporation’s variable interests in non-consolidated VIEs and the maximum exposure to loss as a result of the Corporation’s involvement as servicer with non-consolidated VIEs at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Assets

     

Servicing assets:

     

Mortgage servicing rights

   $ 103,828      $ 113,437  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total servicing assets

$ 103,828   $ 113,437  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other assets:

Servicing advances

$ 8,974   $ 1,416  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other assets

$ 8,974   $ 1,416  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 112,802   $ 114,853  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Maximum exposure to loss

$ 112,802   $ 114,853  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The size of the non-consolidated VIEs, in which the Corporation has a variable interest in the form of servicing fees, measured as the total unpaid principal balance of the loans, amounted to $9.0 billion at December 31, 2014 ($9.2 billion at December 31, 2013).

Maximum exposure to loss represents the maximum loss, under a worst case scenario, that would be incurred by the Corporation, as servicer for the VIEs, assuming all loans serviced are delinquent and that the value of the Corporation’s interests and any associated collateral declines to zero, without any consideration of recovery. The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss includes the fair value of the MSRs and the assumption that the servicing advances at December 31, 2014 and 2013 will not be recovered. The agency debt securities are not included as part of the maximum exposure to loss since they are guaranteed by the related agencies.

In September of 2011, BPPR sold construction and commercial real estate loans with a fair value of $148 million, and most of which were non-performing, to a newly created joint venture, PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC. The joint venture is majority owned by Caribbean Property Group (“CPG”), Goldman Sachs & Co. and East Rock Capital LLC. The joint venture was created for the limited purpose of acquiring the loans from BPPR; servicing the loans through a third-party servicer; ultimately working out, resolving and/or foreclosing the loans; and indirectly owning, operating, constructing, developing, leasing and selling any real properties acquired by the joint venture through deed in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosure, or by resolution of any loan.

BPPR provided financing to the joint venture for the acquisition of the loans in an amount equal to the sum of 57% of the purchase price of the loans, or $84 million, and $2 million of closing costs, for a total acquisition loan of $86 million (the “acquisition loan”). The acquisition loan has a 5-year maturity and bears a variable interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points and is secured by a pledge of all of the acquiring entity’s assets. In addition, BPPR provided the joint venture with a non-revolving advance facility (the “advance facility”) of $68.5 million to cover unfunded commitments and costs-to-complete related to certain construction projects, and a revolving working capital line (the “working capital line”) of $20 million to fund certain operating expenses of the joint venture. Cash proceeds received by the joint venture are first used to cover debt service payments for the acquisition loan, advance facility, and the working capital line described above which must be paid in full before proceeds can be used for other purposes. The distributable cash proceeds are determined based on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the respective equity ownership percentages. BPPR’s equity interest in the joint venture ranks pari-passu with those of other parties involved. As part of the transaction executed in September 2011, BPPR received $ 48 million in cash and a 24.9% equity interest in the joint venture. The Corporation is not required to provide any other financial support to the joint venture.

BPPR accounted for this transaction as a true sale pursuant to ASC Subtopic 860-10 and thus recognized the cash received, its equity investment in the joint venture, and the acquisition loan provided to the joint venture and derecognized the loans sold.

The Corporation has determined that PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is a VIE but it is not the primary beneficiary. All decisions are made by CPG (or an affiliate thereof) (the “Manager”), except for certain limited material decisions which would require the unanimous consent of all members. The Manager is authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the joint venture any and all documents, contracts, certificates, agreements and instruments, and to take any action deemed necessary in the benefit of the joint venture. Also, the Manager delegates the day-to-day management and servicing of the loans to CPG Island Servicing, LLC, an affiliate of CPG, which contracted a sub-servicer, but has the responsibility to oversee such servicing responsibilities.

 

278


The Corporation holds variable interests in this VIE in the form of the 24.9% equity interest and the financing provided to the joint venture. The equity interest is accounted for using the equity method of accounting pursuant to ASC Subtopic 323-10.

The initial fair value of the Corporation’s equity interest in the joint venture was determined based on the fair value of the loans and real estate owned transferred to the joint venture of $148 million which represented the purchase price of the loans agreed by the parties and was an arm’s-length transaction between market participants in accordance with ASC Topic 820, reduced by the acquisition loan provided by BPPR to the joint venture, for a total net equity of $63 million. Accordingly, the 24.9% equity interest held by the Corporation was valued at $16 million. Thus, the fair value of the equity interest is considered a Level 2 fair value measurement since the inputs were based on observable market inputs.

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets related to the Corporation’s variable interests in the non-consolidated VIE, PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC and its maximum exposure to loss at December 31:

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Assets

     

Loans held-in-portfolio:

     

Acquisition loan

   $ —        $ 3,233  

Working capital line advances

     426        390  

Advance facility advances

     4,226        16,024  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 4,652   $ 19,647  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Accrued interest receivable

$ 22   $ 65  

Other assets:

Investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings LLC

$ 23,650   $ 26,596  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 28,324   $ 46,308  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Deposits

$ (2,685 $ (3,621
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

$ (2,685 $ (3,621
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total net assets

$ 25,639   $ 42,687  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Maximum exposure to loss

$ 25,639   $ 42,687  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss under a worst case scenario at December 31, 2014 would be not recovering the carrying amount of the acquisition loan, the advances on the advance facility and working capital line, if any, and the equity interest held by the Corporation, net of the deposits.

On March 25, 2013, BPPR completed a sale of assets with a book value of $509.0 million, of which $500.6 million were in non-performing status, comprised of commercial and construction loans, and commercial and single family real estate owned, with a combined unpaid principal balance on loans and appraised value of other real estate owned of approximately $987.0 million to a newly created joint venture, PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC. The joint venture is majority owned by Caribbean Property Group LLC (“CPG”) and certain affiliates of Perella Weinberg Partners’Asset Based Value Strategy. The joint venture was created for the limited purpose of acquiring the loans from BPPR; servicing the loans through a third-party servicer; ultimately working out, resolving and/or foreclosing the loans; and indirectly owning, operating, constructing, developing, leasing and selling any real properties acquired by the joint venture through deed in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosure, or by resolution of any loan.

BPPR provided financing to the joint venture for the acquisition of the assets in an amount equal to the sum of 57% of the purchase price of the assets, and closing costs, for a total acquisition loan of $182.4 million (the “acquisition loan”). The acquisition loan has a 5-year maturity and bears a variable interest at 30-day LIBOR plus 300 basis points and is secured by a pledge of all of the acquiring entity’s assets. In addition, BPPR provided the joint venture with a non-revolving advance facility (the “advance facility”) of $35.0 million to cover unfunded commitments and costs-to-complete related to certain construction projects, and a revolving working capital line (the “working capital line”) of $30.0 million to fund certain operating expenses of the joint venture. Cash proceeds received by the joint venture are first used to cover debt service payments for the acquisition loan, advance facility, and the working capital line described above which must be paid in full before proceeds can be used for other purposes. The distributable cash proceeds are determined based on a pro-rata basis in accordance with the respective equity ownership percentages. BPPR’s equity interest in the joint venture ranks pari-passu with those of other parties involved. As part of the transaction executed in March 2013, BPPR received $92.3 million in cash and a 24.9% equity interest in the joint venture. The Corporation is not required to provide any other financial support to the joint venture.

 

279


BPPR accounted for this transaction as a true sale pursuant to ASC Subtopic 860-10 and thus recognized the cash received, its equity investment in the joint venture, and the acquisition loan provided to the joint venture and derecognized the loans and real estate owned sold.

The Corporation has determined that PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is a VIE but the Corporation is not the primary beneficiary. All decisions are made by CPG (or an affiliate thereof) (the “Manager”), except for certain limited material decisions which would require the unanimous consent of all members. The Manager is authorized to execute and deliver on behalf of the joint venture any and all documents, contracts, certificates, agreements and instruments, and to take any action deemed necessary in the benefit of the joint venture. Also, the Manager delegates the day-to-day management and servicing of the loans to PR Asset Portfolio Servicing International, LLC, an affiliate of CPG.

The initial fair value of the Corporation’s equity interest in the joint venture was determined based on the fair value of the loans and real estate owned transferred to the joint venture of $306 million which represented the purchase price of the loans agreed by the parties and was an arm’s-length transaction between market participants in accordance with ASC Topic 820, reduced by the acquisition loan provided by BPPR to the joint venture, for a total net equity of $124 million. Accordingly, the 24.9% equity interest held by the Corporation was valued at $31 million. Thus, the fair value of the equity interest is considered a Level 2 fair value measurement since the inputs were based on observable market inputs.

The Corporation holds variable interests in this VIE in the form of the 24.9% equity interest (the “Investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC”) and the financing provided to the joint venture. The equity interest is accounted for under the equity method of accounting pursuant to ASC Subtopic 323-10.

The following table presents the carrying amount and classification of the assets and liabilities related to the Corporation’s variable interests in the non-consolidated VIE, PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC, and its maximum exposure to loss at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Assets

     

Loans held-in-portfolio:

     

Acquisition loan

   $ 97,193      $ 157,660  

Advances under the working capital line

     990        1,196  

Advances under the advance facility

     12,460        1,427  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio

$ 110,643   $ 160,283  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Accrued interest receivable

$ 314   $ 436  

Other assets:

Investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

$ 31,374   $ 30,478  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 142,331   $ 191,197  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Deposits

$ (12,960 $ (20,808
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

$ (12,960 $ (20,808
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total net assets

$ 129,371   $ 170,389  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Maximum exposure to loss

$ 129,371   $ 170,389  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Corporation determined that the maximum exposure to loss under a worst case scenario at December 31, 2014 would be not recovering the carrying amount of the acquisition loan, the advances on the advance facility and working capital line, if any, and the equity interest held by the Corporation, net of deposits.

Note 33 – Derivative instruments and hedging activities

The use of derivatives is incorporated as part of the Corporation’s overall interest rate risk management strategy to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings and cash flows that are caused by interest rate volatility. The Corporation’s goal is to

 

280


manage interest rate sensitivity by modifying the repricing or maturity characteristics of certain balance sheet assets and liabilities so that the net interest income is not materially affected by movements in interest rates. The Corporation uses derivatives in its trading activities to facilitate customer transactions, and as a means of risk management. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged fixed and variable interest rate assets and liabilities will appreciate or depreciate in fair value. The effect of this unrealized appreciation or depreciation is expected to be substantially offset by the Corporation’s gains or losses on the derivative instruments that are linked to these hedged assets and liabilities. As a matter of policy, the Corporation does not use highly leveraged derivative instruments for interest rate risk management.

By using derivative instruments, the Corporation exposes itself to credit and market risk. If a counterparty fails to fulfill its performance obligations under a derivative contract, the Corporation’s credit risk will equal the fair value of the derivative asset. Generally, when the fair value of a derivative contract is positive, this indicates that the counterparty owes the Corporation, thus creating a repayment risk for the Corporation. To manage the level of credit risk, the Corporation deals with counterparties of good credit standing, enters into master netting agreements whenever possible and, when appropriate, obtains collateral. On the other hand, when the fair value of a derivative contract is negative, the Corporation owes the counterparty and, therefore, the fair value of derivatives liabilities incorporates nonperformance risk or the risk that the obligation will not be fulfilled.

The credit risk attributed to the counterparty’s nonperformance risk is incorporated in the fair value of the derivatives. Additionally, as required by the fair value measurements guidance, the fair value of the Corporation’s own credit standing is considered in the fair value of the derivative liabilities. During the year ended December 31, 2014, inclusion of the credit risk in the fair value of the derivatives resulted in loss of $0.1 million (2013 – gain of $ 0.5 million; 2012 –loss of $ 0.5 million) from the Corporation’s credit standing adjustment and a gain of $1.2 million (2013 – gain of $1.0 million; 2012 – gain of $3.4 million) from the assessment of the counterparties’ credit risk.

Market risk is the adverse effect that a change in interest rates, currency exchange rates, or implied volatility rates might have on the value of a financial instrument. The Corporation manages the market risk associated with interest rates and, to a limited extent, with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates by establishing and monitoring limits for the types and degree of risk that may be undertaken.

Pursuant to the Corporation’s accounting policy, the fair value of derivatives is not offset with the amounts for the right to reclaim cash collateral or the obligation to return cash collateral. At December 31, 2014, the amount recognized for the right to reclaim cash collateral under master netting agreements was $15 million and no amount was recognized for the obligation to return cash collateral (December 31, 2013 - $ 19 million and no amount, respectively).

Certain of the Corporation’s derivative instruments include financial covenants tied to the corresponding banking subsidiary’s well-capitalized status and credit rating. These agreements could require exposure collateralization, early termination or both. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with contingent features that were in a liability position at December 31, 2014 was $9 million (December 31, 2013 - $ 15 million). Based on the contractual obligations established on these derivative instruments, the Corporation has fully collateralized these positions by pledging collateral of $15 million at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $ 19 million).

 

281


Financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges or non-hedging derivatives outstanding at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were as follows:

 

     Notional amount     

Derivative assets

    

Derivative liabilities

 
            Statement of    Fair value at      Statement of    Fair value at  
     At December 31,      condition    December 31,      condition    December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013     

classification

   2014      2013     

classification

   2014      2013  

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

                       

Forward contracts

   $ 92,850      $ —        Other assets    $ —        $ —        Other liabilities    $ 551      $ —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments

$ 92,850   $ —     $ —     $ —     $ 551   $ —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

Forward contracts

$ —     $ 129,600   Trading account securities $ —     $ 83   Other liabilities $ —     $ 20  

Forward contracts

  —       152,800   Other assets   —       658   Other liabilities   —       25  

Interest rate swaps

  237,576     283,440   Other assets   8,418     13,289   Other liabilities   9,102     15,196  

Foreign currency forward contracts

  745     —     Other assets   16     —     Other liabilities   11     —    

Interest rate caps

  96,046     97,338   Other assets   320     1,192   Other liabilities   320     1,192  

Indexed options on deposits

  86,712     85,729   Other assets   16,608     19,571   —     —       —    

Bifurcated embedded options

  83,244     83,087   —     —       —     Interest bearing deposits   13,048     15,945  
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

$ 504,323   $ 831,994   $ 25,362   $ 34,793   $ 22,481   $ 32,378  
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total derivative assets and liabilities

$ 597,173   $ 831,994   $ 25,362   $ 34,793   $ 23,032   $ 32,378  
  

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Cash Flow Hedges

The Corporation utilizes forward contracts to hedge the sale of mortgage-backed securities with duration terms over one month. Interest rate forwards are contracts for the delayed delivery of securities, which the seller agrees to deliver on a specified future date at a specified price or yield. These forward contracts are hedging a forecasted transaction and thus qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss). The amount included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) corresponding to these forward contracts is expected to be reclassified to earnings in the next twelve months. These contracts have a maximum remaining maturity of 82 days at December 31, 2014.

 

282


For cash flow hedges, net gains (losses) on derivative contracts that are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to current period earnings are included in the line item in which the hedged item is recorded and during the period in which the forecasted transaction impacts earnings, as presented in the tables below.

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

(In thousands)

  Amount of net gain (loss)
recognized in OCI on
derivatives (effective
portion)
   

Classification in the statement of
operations of the net gain (loss)
reclassified  from AOCI into income
(effective portion, ineffective portion,
and amount excluded from
effectiveness testing)

  Amount of net gain (loss)
reclassified from AOCI into
income (effective portion)
    Amount of net gain (loss)
recognized in income on
derivatives (ineffective
portion and  amount
excluded from
effectiveness testing)
 

Forward contracts

  $ (6,613   Mortgage banking activities   $ (6,091   $ (109
 

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

$ (6,613 $ (6,091 $ (109
 

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

(In thousands)

  Amount of net gain (loss)
recognized in OCI on
derivatives (effective
portion)
   

Classification in the statement of
operations of the net gain (loss)
reclassified  from AOCI into income
(effective portion, ineffective portion,
and amount excluded from
effectiveness testing)

  Amount of net gain (loss)
reclassified from AOCI into
income (effective portion)
    Amount of net gain (loss)
recognized in income on
derivatives (ineffective
portion and  amount
excluded from
effectiveness testing)
 

Forward contracts

  $ 2,286     Mortgage banking activities   $ 1,839     $ 577  
 

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

$ 2,286   $ 1,839   $ 577  
 

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012

 

(In thousands)

  Amount of net gain (loss)
recognized in OCI on
derivatives (effective
portion)
    Classification in the statement of
operations of the net gain (loss)
reclassified from AOCI into  income
(effective portion, ineffective portion,
and amount excluded from
effectiveness testing)
  Amount of net gain (loss)
reclassified from AOCI into
income (effective portion)
    Amount of net gain (loss)
recognized in income on
derivatives (ineffective
portion and  amount
excluded from
effectiveness testing)
 

Forward contracts

  $ (13,509   Mortgage banking activities   $ 14,119     $ (44
 

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

$ (13,509 $ 14,119   $ (44
 

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair Value Hedges

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, there were no derivatives designated as fair value hedges.

Non-Hedging Activities

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation recognized a loss of $ 8.5 million (2013 – gain of $ 11.1 million; 2012 – loss of $ 4.8 million) related to its non-hedging derivatives, as detailed in the table below.

 

     Amount of Net Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives  

(In thousands)

   Classification of Net Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on Derivatives
   Year ended
December 31,
2014
     Year ended
December 31,
2013
     Year ended
December 31,
2012
 

Forward contracts

   Mortgage banking activities    $ (10,876    $ 9,039      $ (8,046

Interest rate swaps

   Other operating income      1,223        965        2,953  

Foreign currency forward contracts

   Other operating income      8        18        31  

Foreign currency forward contracts

   Interest expense      5        (1      (5

Indexed options on deposits

   Interest expense      2,815        5,296        1,965  

Bifurcated embedded options

   Interest expense      (1,666      (4,230      (1,735
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

$ (8,491 $ 11,087   $ (4,837
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

283


Forward Contracts

The Corporation has forward contracts to sell mortgage-backed securities, which are accounted for as trading derivatives. Changes in their fair value are recognized in mortgage banking activities.

Interest Rates Swaps and Foreign Currency and Exchange Rate Commitments

In addition to using derivative instruments as part of its interest rate risk management strategy, the Corporation also utilizes derivatives, such as interest rate swaps and foreign exchange forward contracts, in its capacity as an intermediary on behalf of its customers. The Corporation minimizes its market risk and credit risk by taking offsetting positions under the same terms and conditions with credit limit approvals and monitoring procedures. Market value changes on these swaps and other derivatives are recognized in earnings in the period of change.

Interest Rate Caps and Floors

The Corporation enters into interest rate caps and floors as an intermediary on behalf of its customers and simultaneously takes offsetting positions under the same terms and conditions, thus minimizing its market and credit risks.

Index and Embedded Options

The Corporation offers certain customers’ deposits whose return are tied to the performance of the Standard and Poor’s (“S&P 500”) stock market indexes, and other deposits whose returns are tied to other stock market indexes or other equity securities performance. The Corporation bifurcated the related options embedded within these customers’ deposits from the host contract in accordance with ASC Subtopic 815-15. In order to limit the Corporation’s exposure to changes in these indexes, the Corporation purchases index options which returns are tied to the same indexes from major broker dealer companies in the over the counter market. Accordingly, the embedded options and the related index options are marked-to-market through earnings.

Note 34 – Related party transactions

The Corporation grants loans to its directors, executive officers and certain related individuals or organizations in the ordinary course of business. The activity and balance of these loans were as follows:

 

(In thousands)

   Executive
Officers
     Directors      Total  

Balance at December 31, 2012

   $ 4,947      $ 108,207      $ 113,154  

New loans

     239        40,827        41,066  

Payments

     (301      (51,720      (52,021

Other changes

     24,828        (30,473      (5,645
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

$ 29,713   $ 66,841   $ 96,554  

New loans

  1,163     74,327     75,490  

Payments

  (1,318   (17,161   (18,479

Other changes

  4,529     —       4,529  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

$ 34,087   $ 124,007   $ 158,094  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The amounts reported as “other changes” in the activity for 2013 include items such as changes in the status of those who are considered related parties and a reclassification of a loan acquired as part of the Westernbank acquisition with a carrying value of $25 million as a loan related to an executive officer instead of to a director. This loan was previously classified as related to a director because both a former director (who ceased being a director in 2013) and an executive officer were related parties of the borrower entity.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s banking subsidiaries held deposits from related parties, excluding EVERTEC, Inc. (“EVERTEC”) amounting to $ 24 million (2013 - $ 20 million).

From time to time, the Corporation, in the ordinary course of business, obtains services from related parties or makes contributions to non-profit organizations that have some association with the Corporation. Management believes the terms of such arrangements are consistent with arrangements entered into with independent third parties.

During 2014, the Corporation engaged, in the ordinary course of business, the legal services of a law firm in Puerto Rico, in which the Secretary of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc. acted as senior counsel or as partner. The fees paid to this law firm for the

 

284


year 2014 amounted to approximately $0.7 million (2013 - $1.1 million). During 2014, the Corporation also engaged, in the ordinary course of business, the legal services of a law firm in Puerto Rico, of which the Corporation’s Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer and Secretary of the Board of Directors was a member until September 2014. The fees paid to this law firm for fiscal year 2014 amounted to approximately $3.8 million, which include $0.6 million paid by the Corporation’s clients in connection with commercial loan transactions. In addition, this law firm leases office space in the Corporation’s headquarters building, which is owned by BPPR, and engages BPPR as custodian of its retirement plan. During 2014, this law firm made lease payments to BPPR of approximately $0.7 million and paid BPPR approximately $0.1 million for its services as custodian. The rent and trustee fees paid by this law firm were at market rates.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation made contributions of approximately $0.7 million to Banco Popular Foundations, which are not-for-profit corporations dedicated to philanthropic work (2013 - $0.7 million).

In June 2006, family members of a director of the Corporation, obtained a $0.8 million mortgage loan from Popular Mortgage, Inc., secured by a residential property. The director was not a director of the Corporation at the time the loan was made. In March, 2012 the loan was restructured under the Corporation’s loss mitigation program. The balance due on the loan at December 31, 2014 was approximately $0.9 million.

The brother-in-law of an Executive Vice President of the Corporation, became delinquent on a series of commercial loans granted to him by BPPR. The aggregate amount of principal owed on such loans as of December 31, 2014 was approximately $0.7 million. Certain of the loans are secured by real estate and BPPR commenced collection and foreclosure proceedings in February 2014. The Bank has charged-off an aggregate amount of approximately $0.4 million in connection with these loans. The book value of these loans at December 31, 2014 was of $0.3 million. The same brother-in law of the Executive Vice President of the Corporation, also has a participation in two entities, each of which has a real estate development loan with BPPR. The first loan is to an entity in which he owns a 50% equity interest. The loan is payable from the proceeds of the sale of residential units. The outstanding balance on the loan as of December 31, 2014 was approximately $0.1 million. The second loan is to an entity in which this individual owns a 33% equity interest and which is secured with undeveloped land. The outstanding balance on the loan as of December 31, 2014 was $0.4 million.

On April 10, 2014, BPPR sold two undeveloped parcels of land, which had been foreclosed by BPPR, for the aggregate price of $2.7 million to an entity controlled by a shareholder of the Corporation. On June 30, 2014, BPPR sold a parcel of land, which had been foreclosed by BPPR, to an entity controlled by this same shareholder of the Corporation for $5.3 million. These sales was made on terms and conditions similar to the sale to unaffiliated parties of other real estate assets that have been foreclosed by BPPR and are held for sale. On June 5, 2014, certain borrowers of BPPR sold five real estate properties to affiliates of this same shareholder of the Corporation, as part of a settlement agreement that was executed by said borrowers with BPPR. As part of this settlement, BPPR received payments amounting to $16.7 million from the borrowers and guarantors of the loans that were settled. The settlement of these loans was made on terms and conditions similar to the settlement of other non-performing loans previously settled by BPPR in transactions where only unaffiliated parties were involved.

The Corporation has had loan transactions with the Corporation’s directors and officers, and with their associates, and proposes to continue such transactions in the ordinary course of its business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing for comparable loan transactions with third parties, except as disclosed above. Except as discussed above, the extensions of credit have not involved and do not currently involve more than normal risks of collection or present other unfavorable features.

 

285


Related party transactions with EVERTEC, as an affiliate

The Corporation has an investment in EVERTEC, Inc. (“EVERTEC”), which provides various processing and information technology services to the Corporation and its subsidiaries and gives BPPR access to the ATH network owned and operated by EVERTEC. As of December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s stake in EVERTEC was 14.96%. The Corporation continues to have significant influence over EVERTEC. Accordingly, the investment in EVERTEC is accounted for under the equity method and is evaluated for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that a decrease in value of the investment has occurred that is other than temporary.

The Corporation received $4.7 million in dividend distributions during the year ended December 31, 2014 from its investments in EVERTEC’s holding company (December 31, 2013 - $4.4 million). The Corporation’s equity in EVERTEC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statement of financial condition.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Equity investment in EVERTEC

   $ 25,146      $ 19,931  

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with EVERTEC at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Items that represent liabilities to the Corporation are presented with parenthesis.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Accounts receivable (Other assets)

   $ 5,065      $ 8,634  

Deposits

     (15,481      (14,289

Accounts payable (Other liabilities)

     (15,511      (15,862
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net total

$ (25,927 $ (21,517
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from EVERTEC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of EVERTEC’s income (loss) and changes in stockholders’ equity for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Share of income (loss) from investment in EVERTEC

   $ 10,536      $ (3,762    $ 38,461  

Share of other changes in EVERTEC’s stockholders’ equity

     381        18,965        (187
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Share of EVERTEC’s changes in equity recognized in income

$ 10,917   $ 15,203   $ 38,274  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

286


The following tables present the impact of transactions and service payments between the Corporation and EVERTEC (as an affiliate) and their impact on the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. Items that represent expenses to the Corporation are presented with parenthesis.

 

     Years ended December 31,       

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012     

Category

Interest income on loan to EVERTEC

   $ —        $ 2,490      $ 3,373      Interest income

Interest income on investment securities issued by EVERTEC

     —          1,269        3,850      Interest income

Interest expense on deposits

     (67      (128      (267    Interest expense

ATH and credit cards interchange income from services to EVERTEC

     26,646        25,571        25,188      Other service fees

Debt prepayment penalty paid by EVERTEC

     —          5,856        —        Net gain (loss) and valuation adjustments on investment securities

Consulting fee paid by EVERTEC

     —          9,854        —        Other operating income

Rental income charged to EVERTEC

     6,874        6,560        6,647      Net occupancy

Processing fees on services provided by EVERTEC

     (154,839      (155,521      (150,677    Professional fees

Other services provided to EVERTEC

     1,012        843        751      Other operating expenses
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

$ (120,374 $ (103,206 $ (111,135
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

EVERTEC has a letter of credit issued by BPPR, for an amount of $3.6 million at December 31, 2014 (2013 - $3.6 million). The Corporation also agreed to maintain outstanding this letter of credit for a 5-year period which expires on September 30, 2015. EVERTEC and the Corporation entered into a Reimbursement Agreements, in which EVERTEC will reimburse the Corporation for any losses incurred by the Corporation in connection with the performance bonds and the letter of credit. Possible losses resulting from these agreements are considered insignificant.

PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

As indicated in Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements, the Corporation holds a 24.9% equity interest in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC and currently provides certain financing to the joint venture as well as holds certain deposits from the entity.

The Corporation’s equity in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Equity investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

   $ 23,650      $ 26,596  

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Loans

   $ 4,652      $ 19,647  

Accrued interest receivable

     22        65  

Deposits (non-interest bearing)

     (2,685      (3,621
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net total

$ 1,989   $ 16,091  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

287


The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of income (loss) from PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Share of (loss) income from the equity investment in PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

   $ (2,947    $ 3,347      $ 7,128  

The following table presents transactions between the Corporation and PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC and their impact on the Corporation’s results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

     Years ended December 31,         

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012      Category  

Interest income on loan to PRLP 2011 Holdings, LLC

   $ 425      $ 1,162      $ 2,688        Interest income   

PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

As indicated in Note 32 to the consolidated financial statements, effective March 2013 the Corporation holds a 24.9% equity interest in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC and currently provides certain financing to the joint venture as well as holds certain deposits from the entity.

The Corporation’s equity in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is presented in the table which follows and is included as part of “other assets” in the consolidated statements of financial condition.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Equity investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

   $ 31,374      $ 30,478  

The Corporation had the following financial condition balances outstanding with PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC, at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Loans

   $ 110,643      $ 160,283  

Accrued interest receivable

     314        436  

Deposits

     (12,960      (20,808
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net total

$ 97,997   $ 139,911  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Corporation’s proportionate share of income or loss from PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC is included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of operations. The following table presents the Corporation’s proportionate share of income (loss) from PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC for years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Share of income from the equity investment in PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

   $ 745      $ (1,979

The following table presents transactions between the Corporation and PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC and their impact on the Corporation’s results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     Years ended December 31,         

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      Category  

Interest income on loan to PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

   $ 4,340      $ 2,966        Interest income   

Servicing fee paid by PR Asset Portfolio 2013-1 International, LLC

     70        150        Other service fees   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

$ 4,410   $ 3,116  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

288


Note 35 – Fair value measurement

ASC Subtopic 820-10 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels in order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and disclosures. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

 

   

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date. Valuation on these instruments does not necessitate a significant degree of judgment since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily available in an active market.

 

   

Level 2 - Quoted prices other than those included in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

 

   

Level 3 - Inputs are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs reflect the Corporation’s own assumptions about assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

The Corporation maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available. Fair value is based upon quoted market prices when available. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Corporation employs internally-developed models that primarily use market-based inputs including yield curves, interest rates, volatilities, and credit curves, among others. Valuation adjustments are limited to those necessary to ensure that the financial instrument’s fair value is adequately representative of the price that would be received or paid in the marketplace. These adjustments include amounts that reflect counterparty credit quality, the Corporation’s credit standing, constraints on liquidity and unobservable parameters that are applied consistently.

The estimated fair value may be subjective in nature and may involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment for certain financial instruments. Changes in the underlying assumptions used in calculating fair value could significantly affect the results.

Fair Value on a Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis

The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the Corporation’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2014 and 2013 and on a nonrecurring basis in periods subsequent to initial recognition for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012:

 

At December 31, 2014

 

(In thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

           

Assets

           

Investment securities available-for-sale:

           

U.S. Treasury securities

   $ —        $ 700,154      $ —        $ 700,154  

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

     —          1,724,973        —          1,724,973  

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

     —          61,712        —          61,712  

Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

     —          1,910,030        —          1,910,030  

Mortgage-backed securities

     —          903,037        1,325        904,362  

Equity securities

     323        2,299        —          2,622  

Other

     —          11,306        —          11,306  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 323   $ 5,313,511   $ 1,325   $ 5,315,159  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives:

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ —     $ 7,954   $ —     $ 7,954  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

  —       261     1,375     1,636  

Mortgage-backed securities - federal agencies

  —       104,463     6,229     110,692  

Other

  —       16,682     1,563     18,245  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total trading account securities

$ —      $ 129,360   $ 9,167   $ 138,527  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Mortgage servicing rights

$ —     $ —     $ 148,694   $ 148,694  

Derivatives

  —       25,362     —       25,362  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ 323   $ 5,468,233   $ 159,186   $ 5,627,742  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities

Derivatives

$ —     $ (23,032 $ —     $ (23,032

Contingent consideration

  —       —       (133,634   (133,634
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ —     $ (23,032 $ (133,634 $ (156,666
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

289


At December 31, 2013

 

(In thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2     Level 3     Total  

RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

         

Assets

         

Investment securities available-for-sale:

         

U.S. Treasury securities

   $ —        $ 28,482     $ —       $ 28,482  

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities

     —          1,629,205       —         1,629,205  

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

     —          66,377       —         66,377  

Collateralized mortgage obligations - federal agencies

     —          2,418,296       —         2,418,296  

Collateralized mortgage obligations - private label

     —          513       —         513  

Mortgage-backed securities

     —          1,129,118       6,523       1,135,641  

Equity securities

     412        3,704       —         4,116  

Other

     —          12,170       —         12,170  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total investment securities available-for-sale

$ 412   $ 5,287,865   $ 6,523   $ 5,294,800  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives:

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

$ —     $ 7,586   $ —     $ 7,586  

Collateralized mortgage obligations

  —       426     1,423     1,849  

Mortgage-backed securities - federal agencies

  —       302,952     9,799     312,751  

Other

  —       15,545     1,929     17,474  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total trading account securities

$ —     $ 326,509   $ 13,151   $ 339,660  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Mortgage servicing rights

$ —     $ —     $ 161,099   $ 161,099  

Derivatives

  —       34,793     —       34,793  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ 412   $ 5,649,167   $ 180,773   $ 5,830,352  
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities

Derivatives

$ —     $ (32,378 $ —     $ (32,378

Contingent consideration

  —       —       (128,299   (128,299
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

$ —     $ (32,378 $ (128,299 $ (160,677
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

290


Year ended December 31, 2014

 

(In thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total         

NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

              

Assets

                 Write-downs   

Loans [1]

   $ —        $ —        $ 71,750      $ 71,750      $ (15,405

Loans held-for-sale [2]

     —          —          21,609        21,609        (38

Other real estate owned [3]

     —          6,610        86,520        93,130        (42,366

Other foreclosed assets [3]

     —          —          1,368        1,368        (1,622
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

$ —     $ 6,610   $ 181,247   $ 187,857   $ (59,431
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[2] Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[3] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were written down to their fair value. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

(In thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total         

NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

              

Assets

                 Write-downs   

Loans [1]

   $ —        $ —        $ 25,673      $ 25,673      $ (21,348

Loans held-for-sale [2]

     —          —          —          —          (364,820

Other real estate owned [3]

     —          2,849        84,732        87,581        (43,861

Other foreclosed assets [3]

     —          —          638        638        (617
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

$ —     $ 2,849   $ 111,043   $ 113,892   $ (430,646
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[2] Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[3] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were written down to their fair value. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.

 

Year ended December 31, 2012

 

(In thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total         

NONRECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

              

Assets

                 Write-downs   

Loans [1]

   $ —        $ —        $ 10,445      $ 10,445      $ (23,972

Loans held-for-sale [2]

     —          —          93,429        93,429        (43,937

Other real estate owned [3]

     —          —          111,425        111,425        (32,783

Other foreclosed assets [3]

     —          —          128        128        (360

Long-lived assets held-for-sale [4]

     —          —          —           —          (123
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis

$ —     $ —     $ 215,427   $ 215,427   $ (101,175
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

291


[1] Relates mostly to certain impaired collateral dependent loans. The impairment was measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[2] Relates to lower of cost or fair value adjustments on loans held-for-sale and loans transferred from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[3] Represents the fair value of foreclosed real estate and other collateral owned that were written down to their fair value. Costs to sell are excluded from the reported fair value amount.
[4] Represents the fair value of long-lived assets held-for-sale that were written down to their fair value.

The following tables present the changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

(In thousands)

   MBS
classified
as investment
securities
available-
for-sale
    CMOs
classified
as trading
account
securities
    MBS
classified as
trading account
securities
    Other
securities
classified
as trading
account
securities
    Mortgage
servicing
rights
    Total
assets
    Contingent
consideration
    Total
liabilities
 

Balance at January 1, 2014

   $ 6,523     $ 1,423     $ 9,799     $ 1,929     $ 161,099     $ 180,773     $ (128,299   $ (128,299

Gains (losses) included in earnings

     (31     (11     (165     (366     (24,773     (25,346     (1,791     (1,791

Gains (losses) included in OCI

     (249 )     —         —         —         —         (249     —         —    

Additions

     —         270       805        —         12,583       13,658       (4,330     (4,330

Sales

     (4,350 )     —         (2,110 )     —         —         (6,460     —         —    

Settlements

     (568     (307     (2,100 )     —         (215     (3,190     786       786  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

$ 1,325   $ 1,375   $ 6,229   $ 1,563   $ 148,694   $ 159,186   $ (133,634 $ (133,634
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at December 31, 2014

$ —     $ (7 $ (72 $ (144 $ (6,120 $ (6,343 $ (1,791 $ (1,791
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

(In thousands)

   MBS
classified
as investment
securities
available-
for-sale
    CMOs
classified
as trading
account
securities
    MBS
classified as
trading account
securities
    Other
securities
classified
as trading
account
securities
    Mortgage
servicing
rights
    Total
assets
    Contingent
consideration
    Total
liabilities
 

Balance at January 1, 2013

   $ 7,070     $ 2,499     $ 11,817     $ 2,240     $ 154,430     $ 178,056     $ (112,002   $ (112,002

Gains (losses) included in earnings

     (7     (18     (39     (311     (11,403     (11,778     (16,297     (16,297

Gains (losses) included in OCI

     (40 )     —         —         —         —         (40     —         —    

Additions

     —         25       859        —         19,307       20,191       —         —    

Sales

     —          (802     (100 )     —         —         (902     —         —    

Settlements

     (500     (281     (2,738     —         (1,235     (4,754     —         —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

$ 6,523   $ 1,423   $ 9,799   $ 1,929   $ 161,099   $ 180,773   $ (128,299 $ (128,299
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at December 31, 2013

$ —     $ (4 $ 159   $ 14   $ 15,024   $ 15,193   $ (16,297 $ (16,297
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

292


Year ended December 31, 2012

 

(In thousands)

   MBS
classified
as investment
securities
available-
for-sale
    CMOs
classified
as trading
account
securities
    MBS
classified as
trading account
securities
    Other
securities
classified
as trading
account
securities
    Mortgage
servicing
rights
    Total
assets
    Contingent
consideration
    Total
liabilities
 

Balance at January 1, 2012

   $ 7,435     $ 2,808     $ 21,777     $ 4,036     $ 151,323     $ 187,379     $ (99,762   $ (99,762

Gains (losses) included in earnings

     (6     30       680        (123     (17,406     (16,825     (12,600     (12,600

Gains (losses) included in OCI

     66       —         —         —         —         66       —         —    

Additions

     —         608       6,499       2,116       20,726       29,949       —         —    

Sales

     —         (250     (9,824     (1,834     (103     (12,011     —         —    

Settlements

     (425     (697     (2,104     (1,955     (110     (5,291     360       360  

Transfers into Level 3

     —         —         2,405        —         —         2,405       —         —    

Transfers out of Level 3

     —         —         (7,616 )     —         —         (7,616     —         —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

$ 7,070   $ 2,499   $ 11,817   $ 2,240   $ 154,430   $ 178,056   $ (112,002 $ (112,002
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings relating to assets still held at December 31, 2012

$ —     $ 23   $ (165 $ (333 $ 8,130   $ 7,655   $ (13,347 $ (13,347
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1, Level 2, or Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2012. There were $ 2 million in transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 and $8 million in transfers from Level 3 to Level 2 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the year ended December 31, 2012. The transfers from Level 2 to Level 3 of trading mortgage-backed securities were the result of a change in valuation technique to a matrix pricing model, based on indicative prices provided by brokers. The transfers from Level 3 to Level 2 of trading mortgage-backed securities resulted from observable market data becoming available for these securities. The Corporation’s policy is to recognize transfers as of the end of the reporting period.

Gains and losses (realized and unrealized) included in earnings for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 for Level 3 assets and liabilities included in the previous tables are reported in the consolidated statement of operations as follows:

 

     2014     2013     2012  

(In thousands)

   Total
gains (losses)
included
in earnings
    Changes in unrealized
gains (losses)
relating to assets still
held at reporting date
    Total
gains (losses)
included
in earnings
    Changes in unrealized
gains (losses)
relating to assets still
held at reporting date
    Total
gains (losses)
included
in earnings
    Changes in unrealized
gains (losses)
relating to assets still
held at reporting date
 

Interest income

   $ (31   $ —       $ (7   $ —       $ (6   $ —    

FDIC loss share (expense) income

     (1,791     (1,791     (15,994     (15,994     (13,178     (13,178

Mortgage banking activities

     (24,773     (6,120     (11,403     15,024       (17,406     8,130  

Trading account (loss) profit

     (542     (223     (368     169       587       (475

Other operating income

     —         —         (303     (303     578       (169
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

$ (27,137 $ (8,134 $ (28,075 $ (1,104 $ (29,425 $ (5,692
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

293


The following table includes quantitative information about significant unobservable inputs used to derive the fair value of Level 3 instruments, excluding those instruments for which the unobservable inputs were not developed by the Corporation such as prices of prior transactions and/or unadjusted third-party pricing sources.

 

(In thousands)

  Fair value
at December 31,
2014
   

Valuation technique

 

Unobservable inputs

  Weighted average (range)

CMO’s - trading

  $ 1,375     Discounted cash flow model   Weighted average life   2.2 years (0.6 - 4.8 years)
      Yield   4.0% (1.3% - 4.7%)
      Constant prepayment rate   23.9% (19.5% - 27.9%)

Other - trading

  $ 769     Discounted cash flow model   Weighted average life   5.5 years
      Yield   12.1 %
      Constant prepayment rate   10.8 %

Mortgage servicing rights

  $ 148,694     Discounted cash flow model   Prepayment speed   8.7% (5.3% - 22.7%)
      Weighted average life   11.5 years (4.4 - 18.8 years)
      Discount rate   11.3% (9.5% - 15.0%)

Contingent consideration

  $ (133,634   Discounted cash flow model   Credit loss rate on covered loans   7.3% (0.0% - 100.0%)
      Risk premium component of discount rate   5.0 %

Loans held-in-portfolio

  $ 71,090 [1]     External appraisal   Haircut applied on external appraisals   26.6% (20.0% - 30.0%)

Other real estate owned

  $ 29,715 [2]      External appraisal   Haircut applied on external appraisals   12.5% (10.0% - 30.0%)

Other foreclosed assets

  $ 1,354 [3]      External appraisal   Haircut applied on external appraisals   3.3% (1.0% - 6.0%)

 

[1] Loans held-in-portfolio in which haircuts were not applied to external appraisals were excluded from this table.
[2] Other real estate owned in which haircuts were not applied to external appraisals were excluded from this table.
[3] Other foreclosed assets in which haircuts were not applied to external appraisals were excluded from this table.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s collateralized mortgage obligations and interest-only collateralized mortgage obligation (reported as “other”), which are classified in the “trading” category, are yield, constant prepayment rate, and weighted average life. Significant increases (decreases) in any of those inputs in isolation would result in significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Generally, a change in the assumption used for the constant prepayment rate will generate a directionally opposite change in the weighted average life. For example, as the average life is reduced by a higher constant prepayment rate, a lower yield will be realized, and when there is a reduction in the constant prepayment rate, the average life of these collateralized mortgage obligations will extend, thus resulting in a higher yield. These particular financial instruments are valued internally by the Corporation’s investment banking and broker-dealer unit utilizing internal valuation techniques. The unobservable inputs incorporated into the internal discounted cash flow models used to derive the fair value of collateralized mortgage obligations and interest-only collateralized mortgage obligation (reported as “other”), which are classified in the “trading” category, are reviewed by the Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit on a quarterly basis. In the case of Level 3 financial instruments which fair value is based on broker quotes, the Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit reviews the inputs used by the broker-dealers for reasonableness utilizing information available from other published sources and validates that the fair value measurements were developed in accordance with ASC Topic 820. The Corporate Treasury unit also substantiates the inputs used by validating the prices with other broker-dealers, whenever possible.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Corporation’s mortgage servicing rights are constant prepayment rates and discount rates. Increases in interest rates may result in lower prepayments. Discount rates vary according to products and / or portfolios depending on the perceived risk. Increases in discount rates result in a lower fair value measurement. The Corporation’s Corporate Comptroller’s unit is responsible for determining the fair value of MSRs, which is based on discounted cash flow methods based on assumptions developed by an external service provider, except for prepayment speeds, which are adjusted internally for the local market based on historical experience. The Corporation’s Corporate Treasury unit validates the economic assumptions developed by the external service provider on a quarterly basis. In addition, an analytical review of prepayment speeds is performed quarterly by the Corporate Comptroller’s unit. Significant variances in prepayment speeds are investigated by the Corporate Treasury unit. The Corporation’s MSR Committee analyzes changes in fair value measurements of MSRs and approves the valuation assumptions at each reporting period. Changes in valuation assumptions must also be approved by the MSR Committee. The fair value of MSRs are compared with those of the external service provider on a quarterly basis in order to validate if the fair values are within the materiality thresholds established by management to monitor and investigate material deviations. Back-testing is performed to compare projected cash flows with actual historical data to ascertain the reasonability of the projected net cash flow results.

 

294


Following is a description of the Corporation’s valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts of the financial instruments disclosed do not represent management’s estimate of the underlying value of the Corporation.

Trading Account Securities and Investment Securities Available-for-Sale

 

   

U.S. Treasury securities: The fair value of U.S. Treasury securities is based on yields that are interpolated from the constant maturity treasury curve. These securities are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities: The Obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities include U.S. agency securities, which fair value is based on an active exchange market and on quoted market prices for similar securities. The U.S. agency securities are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions include municipal bonds. The bonds are segregated and the like characteristics divided into specific sectors. Market inputs used in the evaluation process include all or some of the following: trades, bid price or spread, two sided markets, quotes, benchmark curves including but not limited to Treasury benchmarks, LIBOR and swap curves, market data feeds such as those obtained from municipal market sources, discount and capital rates, and trustee reports. The municipal bonds are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Mortgage-backed securities: Certain agency mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) are priced based on a bond’s theoretical value derived from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The agency MBS are classified as Level 2. Other agency MBS such as GNMA Puerto Rico Serials are priced using an internally-prepared pricing matrix with quoted prices from local brokers dealers. These particular MBS are classified as Level 3.

 

   

Collateralized mortgage obligations: Agency and private-label collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) are priced based on a bond’s theoretical value derived from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector and for which fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The option adjusted spread model includes prepayment and volatility assumptions, ratings (whole loans collateral) and spread adjustments. These CMOs are classified as Level 2. Other CMOs, due to their limited liquidity, are classified as Level 3 due to the insufficiency of inputs such as broker quotes, executed trades, credit information and cash flows.

 

   

Equity securities: Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active exchange market are classified as Level 1. Other equity securities that do not trade in highly liquid markets are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Corporate securities and debentures from a not-for-profit organization (included as “other” in the “available-for-sale” category): Given that the quoted prices are for similar instruments, these securities are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Corporate securities, commercial paper, mutual funds, and other equity securities (included as “other” in the “trading account securities” category): Quoted prices for these security types are obtained from broker dealers. Given that the quoted prices are for similar instruments or do not trade in highly liquid markets, these securities are classified as Level 2. The important variables in determining the prices of Puerto Rico tax-exempt mutual fund shares are net asset value, dividend yield and type of assets in the fund. All funds trade based on a relevant dividend yield taking into consideration the aforementioned variables. In addition, demand and supply also affect the price. Corporate securities that trade less frequently or are in distress are classified as Level 3.

Mortgage servicing rights

Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”) do not trade in an active market with readily observable prices. MSRs are priced internally using a discounted cash flow model. The discounted cash flow model incorporates assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income, including portfolio characteristics, prepayments assumptions, discount rates, delinquency and foreclosure rates, late charges, other ancillary revenues, cost to service and other economic factors. Prepayment speeds are adjusted for the Corporation’s loan characteristics and portfolio behavior. Due to the unobservable nature of certain valuation inputs, the MSRs are classified as Level 3.

Derivatives

Interest rate swaps, interest rate caps and indexed options are traded in over-the-counter active markets. These derivatives are indexed to an observable interest rate benchmark, such as LIBOR or equity indexes, and are priced using an income approach

 

295


based on present value and option pricing models using observable inputs. Other derivatives are liquid and have quoted prices, such as forward contracts or “to be announced securities” (“TBAs”). All of these derivatives are classified as Level 2. The non-performance risk is determined using internally-developed models that consider the collateral held, the remaining term, and the creditworthiness of the entity that bears the risk, and uses available public data or internally-developed data related to current spreads that denote their probability of default.

Contingent consideration liability

The fair value of the true-up payment obligation (contingent consideration) to the FDIC as it relates to the Westernbank FDIC-assisted transaction was estimated using projected cash flows related to the loss sharing agreements at the true-up measurement date. It took into consideration the intrinsic loss estimate, asset premium/discount, cumulative shared loss payments, and the cumulative servicing amount related to the loan portfolio. Refer to Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements for a description of the formula established in the loss share agreements for determining the true-up payment.

On a quarterly basis, management evaluates and revises the estimated credit loss rates that are used to determine expected cash flows on the covered loan pools. The expected credit losses on the loan pools are used to determine the loss share cash flows expected to be paid to the FDIC when the true-up payment is due.

The true-up payment obligation was discounted using a term rate consistent with the time remaining until the payment is due. The discount rate was an estimate of the sum of the risk-free benchmark rate for the term remaining before the true-up payment is due and a risk premium to account for the credit risk profile of BPPR. The risk premium was calculated based on a 12-month trailing average spread of the yields on corporate bonds with credit ratings similar to BPPR.

Loans held-in-portfolio considered impaired under ASC Section 310-10-35 that are collateral dependent

The impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral, which is derived from appraisals that take into consideration prices in observed transactions involving similar assets in similar locations, in accordance with the provisions of ASC Section 310-10-35, and which could be subject to internal adjustments based on the age of the appraisal. Currently, the associated loans considered impaired are classified as Level 3.

Loans measured at fair value pursuant to lower of cost or fair value adjustments

Loans measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis pursuant to lower of cost or fair value were priced based on secondary market prices and discounted cash flow models which incorporate internally-developed assumptions for prepayments and credit loss estimates. These loans are classified as Level 3.

Other real estate owned and other foreclosed assets

Other real estate owned includes real estate properties securing mortgage, consumer, and commercial loans. Other foreclosed assets include automobiles securing auto loans. The fair value of foreclosed assets may be determined using an external appraisal, broker price opinion, internal valuation or binding offer. The majority of these foreclosed assets are classified as Level 3 since they are subject to internal adjustments. Certain foreclosed assets which are measured based on binding offers are classified as Level 2.

 

296


Note 36 – Fair value of financial instruments

The fair value of financial instruments is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on the type of financial instrument and relevant market information. Many of these estimates involve various assumptions and may vary significantly from amounts that could be realized in actual transactions.

The information about the estimated fair values of financial instruments presented hereunder excludes all nonfinancial instruments and certain other specific items.

For those financial instruments with no quoted market prices available, fair values have been estimated using present value calculations or other valuation techniques, as well as management’s best judgment with respect to current economic conditions, including discount rates, estimates of future cash flows, and prepayment assumptions.

The fair values reflected herein have been determined based on the prevailing interest rate environment at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, as applicable. In different interest rate environments, fair value estimates can differ significantly, especially for certain fixed rate financial instruments. In addition, the fair values presented do not attempt to estimate the value of the Corporation’s fee generating businesses and anticipated future business activities, that is, they do not represent the Corporation’s value as a going concern. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation.

Following is a description of the Corporation’s valuation methodologies and inputs used to estimate the fair values for each class of financial assets and liabilities not measured at fair value, but for which the fair value is disclosed. The disclosure requirements exclude certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts of the financial instruments disclosed do not represent management’s estimate of the underlying value of the Corporation. For a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used to estimate the fair value for each class of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value, refer to Note 35.

Cash and due from banks

Cash and due from banks include cash on hand, cash items in process of collection, and non-interest bearing deposits due from other financial institutions. The carrying amount of cash and due from banks is a reasonable estimate of its fair value. Cash and due from banks are classified as Level 1.

Money market investments

Investments in money market instruments include highly liquid instruments with an average maturity of three months or less. For this reason, they carry a low risk of changes in value as a result of changes in interest rates, and the carrying amount approximates their fair value. Money market investments include federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, time deposits with other banks, and cash balances, including those held at the Federal Reserve. These money market investments are classified as Level 2, except for cash balances which generate interest, including those held at the Federal Reserve, which are classified as Level 1.

Investment securities held-to-maturity

 

   

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions: Municipal bonds include Puerto Rico public municipalities debt and bonds collateralized by second mortgages under the Home Purchase Stimulus Program. Puerto Rico public municipalities debt was valued internally based on benchmark treasury notes and a credit spread derived from comparable Puerto Rico government trades and recent issuances. Puerto Rico public municipalities debt is classified as Level 3. Given that the fair value of municipal bonds collateralized by second mortgages was based on internal yield and prepayment speed assumptions, these municipal bonds are classified as Level 3.

 

   

Agency collateralized mortgage obligation: The fair value of the agency collateralized mortgage obligation (“CMO”), which is guaranteed by GNMA, was based on internal yield and prepayment speed assumptions. This agency CMO is classified as Level 3.

 

   

Other: Other securities include foreign and corporate debt. Given that the fair value was based on quoted prices for similar instruments, foreign debt is classified as Level 2. The fair value of corporate debt, which is collateralized by municipal bonds of Puerto Rico, was internally derived from benchmark treasury notes and a credit spread based on comparable Puerto Rico government trades, similar securities, and/or recent issuances. Corporate debt is classified as Level 3.

 

297


Other investment securities

 

   

Federal Home Loan Bank capital stock: Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) capital stock represents an equity interest in the FHLB of New York. It does not have a readily determinable fair value because its ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. Since the excess stock is repurchased by the FHLB at its par value, the carrying amount of FHLB capital stock approximates fair value. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Federal Reserve Bank capital stock: Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) capital stock represents an equity interest in the FRB of New York. It does not have a readily determinable fair value because its ownership is restricted and it lacks a market. Since the canceled stock is repurchased by the FRB for the amount of the cash subscription paid, the carrying amount of FRB capital stock approximates fair value. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Trust preferred securities: These securities represent the equity-method investment in the common stock of these trusts. Book value is the same as fair value for these securities since the fair value of the junior subordinated debentures is the same amount as the fair value of the trust preferred securities issued to the public. The equity-method investment in the common stock of these trusts is classified as Level 2, except for that of Popular Capital Trust III (Troubled Asset Relief Program) which is classified as Level 3. Refer to Note 26 for additional information on these trust preferred securities.

 

   

Other investments: Other investments include private equity method investments and Visa Class B common stock held by the Corporation. Since there are no observable market values, private equity method investments are classified as Level 3. The Visa Class B common stock was priced by applying the quoted price of Visa Class A common stock, net of a liquidity adjustment, to the as converted number of Class A common shares since these Class B common shares are restricted and not convertible to Class A common shares until pending litigation is resolved. Thus, these stocks are classified as Level 3.

Loans held-for-sale

The fair value of certain impaired loans held-for-sale was based on a discounted cash flow model that assumes that no principal payments are received prior to the effective average maturity date, that the outstanding unpaid principal balance is reduced by a monthly net loss rate, and that the remaining unpaid principal balance is received as a lump sum principal payment at the effective average maturity date. The remaining unpaid principal balance expected to be received, which is based on the prior 12-month cash payment experience of these loans and their expected collateral recovery, was discounted using the interest rate currently offered to clients for the origination of comparable loans. These loans were classified as Level 3. As of December 31, 2014, no loans were valued under this methodology. For loans held-for-sale originated with the intent to sell in the secondary market, its fair value was determined using similar characteristics of loans and secondary market prices assuming the conversion to mortgage-backed securities. Given that the valuation methodology uses internal assumptions based on loan level data, these loans are classified as Level 3. The fair value of certain other loans held-for-sale is based on bids received from potential buyers; binding offers; or external appraisals, net of internal adjustments and estimated costs to sell. Loans held-for-sale based on binding offers are classified as Level 2. Loans held-for-sale based on indicative offers and/or external appraisals are classified as Level 3.

Loans held-in-portfolio

The fair values of the loans held-in-portfolio have been determined for groups of loans with similar characteristics. Loans were segregated by type such as commercial, construction, residential mortgage, consumer, and credit cards. Each loan category was further segmented based on loan characteristics, including interest rate terms, credit quality and vintage. Generally, fair values were estimated based on an exit price by discounting expected cash flows for the segmented groups of loans using a discount rate that considers interest, credit and expected return by market participant under current market conditions. Additionally, prepayment, default and recovery assumptions have been applied in the mortgage loan portfolio valuations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of the lease financing portfolio, therefore it is included in the loans total at its carrying amount. Loans held-in-portfolio are classified as Level 3.

 

298


FDIC loss share asset

Fair value of the FDIC loss share asset was estimated using projected net losses related to the loss sharing agreements, which are expected to be reimbursed by the FDIC. The projected net losses were discounted using the U.S. Government agency curve. The loss share asset is classified as Level 3.

Deposits

 

   

Demand deposits: The fair value of demand deposits, which have no stated maturity, was calculated based on the amount payable on demand as of the respective dates. These demand deposits include non-interest bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts. Thus, these deposits are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Time deposits: The fair value of time deposits was calculated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using interest rates being offered on time deposits with similar maturities. The non-performance risk was determined using internally-developed models that consider, where applicable, the collateral held, amounts insured, the remaining term, and the credit premium of the institution. For certain 5-year certificates of deposit in which customers may withdraw their money anytime with no penalties or charges, the fair value of these certificates of deposit incorporate an early cancellation estimate based on historical experience. Time deposits are classified as Level 2.

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

 

   

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (structured and non-structured): Securities sold under agreements to repurchase with short-term maturities approximate fair value because of the short-term nature of those instruments. Resell and repurchase agreements with long-term maturities were valued using discounted cash flows based on the three-month LIBOR. In determining the non-performance credit risk valuation adjustment, the collateralization levels of these long-term securities sold under agreements to repurchase were considered. In the case of callable structured repurchase agreements, the callable feature is not considered when determining the fair value of those repurchase agreements, since there is a remote possibility, based on forward rates, that the investor will call back these agreements before maturity since it is not expected that the interest rates would rise more than the specified interest rate of these agreements. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (structured and non-structured) are classified as Level 2.

Other short-term borrowings

The carrying amount of other short-term borrowings approximate fair value because of the short-term maturity of those instruments or because they carry interest rates which approximate market. Thus, these other short-term borrowings are classified as Level 2.

Notes payable

 

   

FHLB advances: The fair value of FHLB advances was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows over their contractual term. In determining the non-performance credit risk valuation adjustment, the collateralization levels of these advances were considered. These advances are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Medium-term notes: The fair value of publicly-traded medium-term notes was determined using recent trades of similar transactions. Publicly-traded medium-term notes are classified as Level 2. The fair value of non-publicly traded debt was based on remaining contractual cash outflows, discounted at a rate commensurate with the non-performance credit risk of the Corporation, which is subjective in nature. Non-publicly traded debt is classified as Level 3.

 

   

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities): The fair value of junior subordinated interest debentures was determined using recent trades of similar transactions. Thus, these junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (Troubled Asset Relief Program): The fair value of junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures was based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows over their contractual term. The discount rate was based on the rate at which a similar security was priced in the open market. Thus, these junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures are classified as Level 3.

 

   

Others: The other category includes capital lease obligations. Generally accepted accounting principles do not require a fair valuation of capital lease obligations, therefore; it is included at its carrying amount. Capital lease obligations are classified as Level 3.

 

299


Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit

Commitments to extend credit were valued using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements. For those commitments where a future stream of fees is charged, the fair value was estimated by discounting the projected cash flows of fees on commitments. Since the fair value of commitments to extend credit varies depending on the undrawn amount of the credit facility, fees are subject to constant change, and cash flows are dependent on the creditworthiness of borrowers, commitments to extend credit are classified as Level 3. The fair value of letters of credit was based on fees currently charged on similar agreements. Given that the fair value of letters of credit constantly vary due to fees being subject to constant change and whether the fees are received depends on the creditworthiness of the account parties, letters of credit are classified as Level 3.

The following tables present the carrying or notional amounts, as applicable, and estimated fair values for financial instruments with their corresponding level in the fair value hierarchy.

 

     December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Carrying
amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Fair value  

Financial Assets:

              

Cash and due from banks

   $ 381,095      $ 381,095      $ —        $ —        $ 381,095  

Money market investments

     1,822,386        1,671,477        150,909        —          1,822,386  

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives [1]

     138,527        —          129,360        9,167        138,527  

Investment securities available-for-sale [1]

     5,315,159        323        5,313,511        1,325        5,315,159  

Investment securities held-to-maturity:

              

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

     101,573        —          —          92,597        92,597  

Collateralized mortgage obligation-federal agency

     97        —          —          102        102  

Other

     1,500        —          1,500        —          1,500  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 103,170   $ —     $ 1,500   $ 92,699   $ 94,199  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other investment securities:

FHLB stock

$ 66,773   $ —     $ 66,773   $ —     $ 66,773  

FRB stock

  80,025     —       80,025     —       80,025  

Trust preferred securities

  13,197     —       12,197     1,000     13,197  

Other investments

  1,911     —       —       5,028     5,028  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other investment securities

$ 161,906   $ —     $ 158,995   $ 6,028   $ 165,023  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-for-sale

$ 106,104   $ —     $ 27,074   $ 87,862   $ 114,936  

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreement with the FDIC

  18,884,732     —       —       18,079,609     18,079,609  

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  2,460,589     —       —       2,947,909     2,947,909  

FDIC loss share asset

  542,454     —       —       481,420     481,420  

Mortgage servicing rights

  148,694     —       —       148,694     148,694  

Derivatives

  25,362     —       25,362     —       25,362  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

300


     December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Carrying
amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Fair value  

Financial Liabilities:

              

Deposits:

              

Demand deposits

   $ 17,333,090      $ —        $ 17,333,090      $ —        $ 17,333,090  

Time deposits

     7,474,445        —          7,512,683        —          7,512,683  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total deposits

$ 24,807,535   $ —     $ 24,845,773   $ —     $ 24,845,773  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase:

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 1,271,657   $ —     $ 1,269,398   $ —     $ 1,269,398  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 1,271,657   $ —     $ 1,269,398   $ —     $ 1,269,398  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other short-term borrowings [2]

$ 21,200   $ —     $ 20,200   $ 1,000   $ 21,200  

Notes payable:

FHLB advances

  802,198     —       814,877     —       814,877  

Unsecured senior debt securities

  450,000     —       460,530     —       460,530  

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities)

  439,800     —       379,400     —       379,400  

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (Troubled

Others

  19,830     —       —       19,830     19,830  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total notes payable

$ 1,711,828   $ —     $ 1,654,807   $ 19,830   $ 1,674,637  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Derivatives

$ 23,032   $ —     $ 23,032   $ —     $ 23,032  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

$ 133,634   $ —     $ —     $ 133,634   $ 133,634  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

(In thousands)

   Notional
amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Fair value  

Commitments to extend credit

   $ 7,135,352      $ —        $ —        $ 1,716      $ 1,716  

Letters of credit

     49,182        —          —          486        486  

 

[1] Refer to Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements for the fair value by class of financial asset and its hierarchy level.
[2] Refer to Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition of short-term borrowings.

 

301


     December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Carrying
amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Fair value  

Financial Assets:

              

Cash and due from banks

   $ 423,211      $ 423,211      $ —        $ —        $ 423,211  

Money market investments

     858,453        677,033        181,420        —          858,453  

Trading account securities, excluding derivatives [1]

     339,660        —          326,509        13,151        339,660  

Investment securities available-for-sale [1]

     5,294,800        412        5,287,865        6,523        5,294,800  

Investment securities held-to-maturity:

              

Obligations of Puerto Rico, States and political subdivisions

     113,881        —          —          94,712        94,712  

Collateralized mortgage obligation-federal agency

     115        —          —          122        122  

Other

     26,500        —          1,500        24,354        25,854  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total investment securities held-to-maturity

$ 140,496   $ —     $ 1,500   $ 119,188   $ 120,688  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other investment securities:

FHLB stock

$ 85,245   $ —     $ 85,245   $ —     $ 85,245  

FRB stock

  80,385     —       80,385     —       80,385  

Trust preferred securities

  14,197     —       13,197     1,000     14,197  

Other investments

  1,925     —       —       4,699     4,699  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other investment securities

$ 181,752   $ —     $ 178,827   $ 5,699   $ 184,526  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans held-for-sale

$ 110,426   $ —     $ 3,155   $ 109,405   $ 112,560  

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreement with the FDIC

  21,073,403     —       —       19,070,337     19,070,337  

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  2,882,335     —       —       3,404,128     3,404,128  

FDIC loss share asset

  948,608     —       —       837,131     837,131  

Mortgage servicing rights

  161,099     —       —       161,099     161,099  

Derivatives

  34,793     —       34,793     —       34,793  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Carrying
amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Fair value  

Financial Liabilities:

              

Deposits:

              

Demand deposits

   $ 18,399,793      $ —        $ 18,399,793      $ —        $ 18,399,793  

Time deposits

     8,311,352        —          8,367,410        —          8,367,410  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total deposits

$ 26,711,145   $ —     $ 26,767,203   $ —     $ 26,767,203  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase:

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 1,021,102   $ —     $ 1,025,628   $ —     $ 1,025,628  

Structured repurchase agreements

  638,190     —       694,422     —       694,422  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets sold under agreements to repurchase

$ 1,659,292   $ —     $ 1,720,050   $ —     $ 1,720,050  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other short-term borrowings [2]

$ 401,200   $ —     $ 401,200   $ —     $ 401,200  

Notes payable:

FHLB advances

  589,229     —       604,976     —       604,976  

Medium-term notes

  689     —       —       716     716  

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (related to trust preferred securities)

  439,800     —       348,222     —       348,222  

Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures (Troubled Asset Relief Program)

  531,540     —       —       1,006,638     1,006,638  

Others

  23,496     —       —       23,496     23,496  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total notes payable

$ 1,584,754   $ —     $ 953,198   $ 1,030,850   $ 1,984,048  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Derivatives

$ 32,378   $ —     $ 32,378   $ —     $ 32,378  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Contingent consideration

$ 128,299   $ —     $ —     $ 128,299   $ 128,299  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

302


(In thousands)

   Notional
amount
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Fair value  

Commitments to extend credit

   $ 7,490,927      $ —        $ —        $ 2,571      $ 2,571  

Letters of credit

     82,007        —          —          901        901  

 

[1] Refer to Note 35 to the consolidated financial statements for the fair value by class of financial asset and its hierarchy level.
[2] Refer to Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements for the composition of short-term borrowings.

Note 37 – Employee benefits

Pension and benefit restoration plans

Certain employees of BPPR are covered by non-contributory defined benefit pension plans. Pension benefits are based on age, years of credited service, and final average compensation.

BPPR’s non-contributory, defined benefit retirement plan are currently closed to new hires and the accrual of benefits are frozen to all participants. The retirement plan’s benefit formula is based on a percentage of average final compensation and years of service as of the plan freeze date. Normal retirement age under the retirement plans is age 65 with 5 years of service. Pension costs are funded in accordance with minimum funding standards under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Benefits under the BPPR retirement plan are subject to the U.S. and PR Internal Revenue Code limits on compensation and benefits. Benefits under restoration plans restore benefits to selected employees that are limited under the retirement plan due to U.S. and PR Internal Revenue Code limits and a compensation definition that excludes amounts deferred pursuant to nonqualified arrangements. The freeze applied to the restoration plan as well.

During 2013 the Corporation offered a Lump Sum Distribution to terminated vested participants whose deferred pension has a current value of up to $40 thousand. The acceptance of this offer was voluntary and relieved the Corporation of all future obligations related to the terminated vested participants who accepted the offer. Approximately 1,859 participants were eligible to elect the Lump Sum Distribution and 1,081 participants accepted the offer.

The Corporation’s funding policy is to make annual contributions to the plans, when necessary, in amounts which fully provide for all benefits as they become due under the plans.

The Corporation’s pension fund investment strategy is to invest in a prudent manner for the exclusive purpose of providing benefits to participants. A well defined internal structure has been established to develop and implement a risk-controlled investment strategy that is targeted to produce a total return that, when combined with the bank’s contributions to the fund, will maintain the fund’s ability to meet all required benefit obligations. Risk is controlled through diversification of asset types, such as investments in domestic and international equities and fixed income.

Equity investments include various types of stock and index funds. Also, this category includes Popular, Inc.’s common stock. Fixed income investments include U.S. Government securities and other U.S. agencies’ obligations, corporate bonds, mortgage loans, mortgage-backed securities and index funds, among others. A designated committee periodically reviews the performance of the pension plans’ investments and assets allocation. The Trustee and the money managers are allowed to exercise investment discretion, subject to limitations established by the pension plans’ investment policies. The plans forbid money managers to enter into derivative transactions, unless approved by the Trustee.

The overall expected long-term rate-of-return-on-assets assumption reflects the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide for the benefits included in the benefit obligation. The assumption has been determined by reflecting expectations regarding future rates of return for the plan assets, with consideration given to the distribution of the investments by asset class and historical rates of return for each individual asset class. This process is reevaluated at least on an annual basis and if market, actuarial and economic conditions change, adjustments to the rate of return may come into place.

The plans’ target allocation based on market value for years 2014 and 2013, by asset category, is summarized in the table below.

 

     Minimum allotment     Maximum allotment  

Equity

     0     70

Debt securities

     0     100

Cash and cash equivalents

     0     100

 

303


The following table presents the composition of the assets of the pension and benefit restoration plans.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Obligations of the U.S. Government and its agencies

   $ 210,549      $ 198,992  

Corporate bonds and debentures

     50,708        43,885  

Equity securities

     241,458        238,792  

Index fund - equity

     27,888        33,347  

Foreign commingled trust fund

     9,998        —    

Foreign equity fund

     79,666        87,336  

Foreign index fund

     29,643        43,711  

Commodity fund

     13,480        16,451  

Mortgage-backed securities

     12,913        12,950  

Private equity investments

     546        922  

Cash and cash equivalents

     18,834        27,456  

Accrued investment income

     1,557        1,640  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 697,240   $ 705,482  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Until September 30, 2013 certain assets of the plans were maintained, for investment purposes only in a Master Trust (the “Master Trust”). Neither the pension or benefit restoration plan had any interest in the specific assets of the Master Trust, but maintained beneficial interests in such assets. The Master Trust was managed by the Trust Division of BPPR and by several investment managers.

At December 31, 2012, the pension and restoration plans’ interest in the net assets of the Master Trust was 100%. At September 30, 2013 the Master Trust was dissolved and all the investments were allocated to the plans based on their relative interest on the net assets of the Master Trust.

The following table sets forth by level, within the fair value hierarchy, the plans’ assets at fair value at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     2014      2013  

(In thousands)

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

Obligations of the U.S. Government and its agencies

   $ —        $ 210,549      $ —        $ 210,549      $ —        $ 198,992      $ —        $ 198,992  

Corporate bonds and debentures

     —          50,708        —          50,708        —          43,885        —          43,885  

Equity securities

     241,458        —          —          241,458        238,792        —          —          238,792  

Index fund - equity

     27,888        —          —          27,888        33,347        —          —          33,347  

Foreign commingled trust fund

     —          9,998        —          9,998        —          —          —          —    

Foreign equity fund

     —          79,666        —          79,666        —          87,336        —          87,336  

Foreign index fund

     —          29,643        —          29,643        —          43,711        —          43,711  

Commodity fund

     —          13,480        —          13,480        —          16,451        —          16,451  

Mortgage-backed securities

     —          12,913        —          12,913        —          12,950        —          12,950  

Private equity investments

     —          —          546        546        —          —          922        922  

Cash and cash equivalents

     18,834        —          —          18,834        27,456        —          —          27,456  

Accrued investment income

     —          —          1,557        1,557        —          —          1,640        1,640  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 288,180   $ 406,957   $ 2,103   $ 697,240   $ 299,595   $ 403,325   $ 2,562   $ 705,482  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The closing prices reported in the active markets in which the securities are traded are used to value the investments.

 

304


Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for investments measured at fair value:

 

   

Obligations of U.S. Government and its agencies - The fair value of Obligations of U.S. Government and agencies obligations is based on an active exchange market and is based on quoted market prices for similar securities. These securities are classified as Level 2. U.S. agency structured notes are priced based on a bond’s theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector and for which the fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread in deriving their fair value. These securities are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Corporate bonds and debentures - Corporate bonds and debentures are valued at fair value at the closing price reported in the active market in which the bond is traded. These securities are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Equity securities - Equity securities with quoted market prices obtained from an active exchange market and high liquidity are classified as Level 1.

 

   

Equity index funds - Equity with quoted market prices obtained from an active exchange market and high liquidity are classified as Level 1.

 

    Foreign commingled trust fund – are collective investment funds that are valued at the net asset value (NAV) of shares held by the plan at year end. These securities are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Index funds – Fixed income, foreign equity, foreign index and commodity funds are valued at the net asset value (NAV) of shares held by the plan at year end. These securities are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Mortgage-backed securities - Certain agency mortgage and other asset backed securities (“MBS”) are priced based on a bond’s theoretical value from similar bonds defined by credit quality and market sector. Their fair value incorporates an option adjusted spread. The agency MBS are classified as Level 2.

 

   

Private equity investments - Private equity investments include an investment in a private equity fund. The fund value is recorded at its net asset value (NAV) which is affected by the changes in the fair market value of the investments held in the fund. This fund is classified as Level 3.

 

   

Cash and cash equivalents - The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents is a reasonable estimate of the fair value since it is available on demand or due to their short-term maturity.

 

   

Accrued investment income – Given the short-term nature of these assets, their carrying amount approximates fair value. Since there is a lack of observable inputs related to instrument specific attributes, these are reported as Level 3.

The preceding valuation methods may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although the plan believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

The following table presents the change in Level 3 assets measured at fair value.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Balance at beginning of year

   $ 2,562      $ 2,848  

Actual return on plan assets:

     

Change in unrealized (loss) gain relating to instruments still held at the reporting date

     (459      (286

Settlements

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

$ 2,103   $ 2,562  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 3 for financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. There were no transfers in and/or out of Level 1 and Level 2 during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

305


Information on the shares of common stock held by the pension and restoration plans is provided in the table that follows.

 

     2014      2013  

Shares of Popular, Inc. common stock

     274,572        274,572  

Fair value of shares of Popular, Inc. common stock

   $ 9,349,177      $ 7,888,454  

Dividends paid on shares of Popular, Inc. common stock held by the plan

   $ —        $ —    

The following table sets forth the aggregate status of the plans and the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     Pension plan      Benefit restoration plans  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2014      2013  

Change in benefit obligation:

           

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

   $ 653,396      $ 751,605      $ 36,096      $ 40,051  

Interest cost

     29,844        27,863        1,659        1,493  

Actuarial (gain) loss

     131,610        (76,997      6,238        (4,169

Benefits paid

     (37,035      (49,075      (1,329      (1,279
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at end of year

$ 777,815   $ 653,396   $ 42,664   $ 36,096  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Change in fair value of plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

$ 671,299   $ 625,519   $ 34,183   $ 30,616  

Actual return on plan assets

  28,501     94,855     1,570     4,795  

Employer contributions

  —       —       51     51  

Benefits paid

  (37,035   (49,075   (1,329   (1,279
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$ 662,765   $ 671,299   $ 34,475   $ 34,183  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss:

Net loss

$ 289,233   $ 147,677   $ 13,588   $ 6,928  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL)

$ 289,233   $ 147,677   $ 13,588   $ 6,928  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Reconciliation of net assets (liabilities):

Net liabilities at beginning of year

$ 17,903   $ (126,086 $ (1,912 $ (9,434

Amount recognized in AOCL at beginning of year, pre-tax

  147,677     297,765     6,928     15,055  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Amount prepaid at beginning of year

  165,580     171,679     5,016     5,621  

Net periodic benefit income (cost)

  8,603     (6,099   332     (656

Contributions

  —       —       51     51  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Amount prepaid at end of year

  174,183     165,580     5,399     5,016  

Amount recognized in AOCL

  (289,233   (147,677   (13,588   (6,928
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net assets (liabilities) at end of year

$ (115,050 $ 17,903   $ (8,189 $ (1,912
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The table below presents a breakdown of the plans’ assets and liabilities at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     Pension plan      Benefit restoration plans  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2014      2013  

Non-current assets

   $ —        $ 17,903      $ —        $ 504  

Current liabilities

     —          —          173        51  

Non-current liabilities

     115,050        —          8,016        2,365  

 

306


The following table presents the funded status of the plans at year end December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

     Pension Plan     Tax Qualified Restoration Plan     Benefit Restoration Plan  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2014     2013     2014     2013  

Benefit obligation at end of year

   $ (777,815   $ (653,396   $ (39,768   $ (33,679   $ (2,896   $ (2,416

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

     662,765       671,299       34,475       34,183       —         —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Funded status at year end

$ (115,050 $ 17,903   $ (5,293 $ 504   $ (2,896 $ (2,416
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The following table presents the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss (“AOCL”), pre-tax, for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   Pension plan      Benefit restoration plans  
     2014      2013      2014      2013  

Accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of year

   $ 147,677      $ 297,765      $ 6,928      $ 15,055  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in AOCL:

Recognized during the year:

Amortization of actuarial losses

  (8,074   (21,452   (431   (1,330

Occurring during the year:

Net actuarial (gains) losses

  149,630     (128,636   7,091     (6,797
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total (decrease) increase in AOCL

  141,556     (150,088   6,660     (8,127
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss at end of year

$ 289,233   $ 147,677   $ 13,588   $ 6,928  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during 2015.

 

(In thousands)

   Pension plan      Benefit restoration plans  

Net loss

   $ 17,859      $ 1,244  

The following table presents information for plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets.

 

     Pension plan      Benefit restoration plans  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2014      2013  

Projected benefit obligation

   $ 777,815      $ —        $ 42,664      $ 2,416  

Accumulated benefit obligation

     777,815        —          42,664        2,416  

Fair value of plan assets

     662,765        —          34,475        —    

The following table presents information for plans with an accumulated benefits obligation less than plan assets.

 

     Pension plan      Benefit restoration plans  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2014      2013  

Projected benefit obligation

   $ —        $ 653,396      $ —        $ 33,680  

Accumulated benefit obligation

     —          653,396        —          33,680  

Fair value of plan assets

     —          671,299        —          34,183  

 

307


The actuarial assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations at year end were as follows:

 

     Pension plan     Benefit restoration plans  
     2014     2013     2014     2013  

Discount rate

     3.90     4.70     3.90     4.70

The following table presents the actuarial assumptions used to determine the components of net periodic benefit cost.

 

     Pension plan     Benefit restoration plans  
     2014     2013     2012     2014     2013     2012  

Discount rate

     4.70     3.80     4.40     4.70     3.80     4.40

Expected return on plan assets

     7.25     7.25     7.60     7.25     7.25     7.60

The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost.

 

     Pension plan     Benefit restoration plans  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2012     2014     2013     2012  

Interest cost

   $ 29,844     $ 27,863     $ 29,981     $ 1,659     $ 1,493     $ 1,572  

Expected return on plan assets

     (46,521     (43,216     (39,240     (2,422     (2,167     (2,105

Recognized net actuarial loss

     8,074       21,452       21,703       431       1,330       1,294  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit (credit) cost

$ (8,603 $ 6,099   $ 12,444   $ (332 $ 656   $ 761  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Corporation expects to pay the following contributions to the benefit plans during 2015.

 

(In thousands)

   2015  

Pension plan

   $ —    

Benefit restoration plans

   $ 173  

Benefit payments projected to be made from the pension and benefit restoration plans are presented in the table below.

 

(In thousands)

   Pension plan      Benefit restoration plans  

2015

   $ 36,977      $ 1,763  

2016

     37,473        1,914  

2017

     38,129        2,058  

2018

     38,786        2,161  

2019

     39,483        2,304  

2020 - 2024

     205,506        12,126  

Postretirement health care benefits

In addition to providing pension benefits, BPPR provides certain health care benefits for certain retired employees. Regular employees of BPPR, hired before February 1, 2000, may become eligible for health care benefits, provided they reach retirement age while working for BPPR.

The Corporation amended the postretirement health care benefits plan effective January 1, 2014 to increase the participant’s share of the plan cost. The postretirement health care benefit obligation as of December 31, 2013 reflects such amendments to the plan.

 

308


The following table presents the status of the Corporation’s unfunded postretirement health care benefit plan and the related amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Change in benefit obligation:

     

Benefit obligation at beginning of the year

   $ 145,732      $ 183,611  

Service cost

     1,457        2,257  

Interest cost

     6,846        6,848  

Amendments

     —          (18,670

Benefits paid

     (5,688      (7,066

Actuarial (gain) loss

     13,471      $ (21,248
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Benefit obligation end of year

$ 161,818     145,732  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss:

Net prior service cost

$ (14,870 $ (18,670

Net loss

  25,817     12,346  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive (gain) loss

$ 10,947   $ (6,324
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Reconciliation of net liability:

Net liability at beginning of year

$ (145,732 $ (183,611

Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss at beginning of year, pre-tax

  (6,324   35,486  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Amount accrued at beginning of year

  (152,056   (148,125

Net periodic benefit cost

  (4,503   (10,997

Contributions

  5,688     7,066  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Amount accrued at end of year

  (150,871   (152,056

Amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss)

  (10,947   6,324  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net liability at end of year

$ (161,818 $ (145,732
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The table below presents a breakdown of the liability associated with the postretirement health care benefit plan.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Current liabilities

   $ 5,820      $ 6,199  

Non-current liabilities

     155,998        139,532  

The following table presents the funded status of the postretirement health care benefit plan at year end December 31, 2014 and 2013.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Benefit obligation at end of year

   $ (161,818    $ (145,732

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Funded status at year end

  (161,818   (145,732
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

309


The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss (income), pre-tax, for the postretirement health care benefit plan.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss at beginning of year

   $ (6,324    $ 35,486  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in accumulated other comprehensive loss:

Recognized during the year:

Prior service credit

  3,800     —    

Amortization of actuarial losses

  —       (1,892

Occurring during the year:

Prior service cost (credit)

  —       (18,670

Net actuarial (gains) losses

  13,471     (21,248
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total increase (decrease) in accumulated other comprehensive loss

  17,271     (41,810
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss at end of year

$ 10,947   $ (6,324
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents the amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost for the postretirement health care benefit plan during 2015.

 

(In thousands)

   2015  

Net prior service credit

   $ (3,800
  

 

 

 

Net loss

$ 996  
  

 

 

 

The following table presents the components of net periodic postretirement health care benefit cost.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Service cost

   $ 1,457      $ 2,257      $ 2,190  

Interest cost

     6,846        6,848        7,801  

Amortization of prior service credit

     (3,800      —          (200

Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)

     —          1,892        2,162  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

$ 4,503   $ 10,997   $ 11,953  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following tables present the discount rate and assumed health care cost trend rates used to determine the benefit obligation and the net periodic benefit cost for the postretirement health care benefit plan.

 

To determine benefit obligation:

   2014     2013  

Discount rate

     4.00     4.80

Initial health care cost trend rates

     7.00     7.50

Ultimate health care cost trend rate

     5.00     5.00

Year that the ultimate trend rate is reached

     2019       2019  

 

To determine net periodic benefit cost:

   2014     2013     2012  

Discount rate

     4.80     3.80     4.40

Initial health care cost trend rates:

      

Medicare Advantage plans

     7.50     6.50     25.00

All other plans

     7.50       6.50       7.00  

Ultimate health care cost trend rate

     5.00     5.00     5.00

Year that the ultimate trend rate is reached

     2019       2016       2016  

 

310


Assumed health care trend rates generally have a significant effect on the amounts reported for a health care plan. The following table presents the effects of changes in the assumed health care cost trend rates.

 

(In thousands)

   1-percentage point
increase
     1-percentage point
decrease
 

Effect on total service cost and interest cost components

   $ 290      $ (363

Effect on postretirement benefit obligation

   $ 8,449      $ (9,955

The following table presents information for the postretirement health care benefit plan with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

Projected benefit obligation

   $ 161,818      $ 145,732  

Accumulated benefit obligation

     161,818        145,732  

Fair value of plan assets

     —          —    

The Corporation expects to contribute $5.8 million to the postretirement benefit plan in 2015 to fund current benefit payment requirements.

Benefit payments projected to be made on the postretirement health care benefit plan are presented in the following table.

 

(In thousands)

      

2015

   $ 5,820  

2016

     5,998  

2017

     6,290  

2018

     6,565  

2019

     6,844  

2020 - 2024

     37,668  

Savings plans

The Corporation also provides defined contribution savings plans pursuant to Section 1081.01(d) of the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code and Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, as applicable, for substantially all the employees of the Corporation. Investments in the plans are participant-directed, and employer matching contributions are determined based on the specific provisions of each plan. Employees are fully vested in the employer’s contribution after five years of service. Effective March 20, 2009, the savings plans were amended to suspend the employer matching contribution to the plan. This matching contribution was restored on April 2013. The cost of providing these benefits in the year ended December 31, 2014 was $5.0 million (2013 - $3.6 million).

The plans held 1,820,318 (2013 – 1,939,089) shares of common stock of the Corporation with a market value of approximately $62.0 million at December 31, 2014 (2013 - $55.7 million).

 

311


Note 38 – Net (loss) income per common share

The following table sets forth the computation of net (loss) income per common share (“EPS”), basic and diluted, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012:

 

(In thousands, except per share information)

   2014      2013      2012  

Net (loss) income from continuing operations

   $ (190,510    $ 558,818      $ 207,457  

Net (loss) income from discontinued operations

     (122,980      40,509        37,818  

Preferred stock dividends

     (3,723      (3,723      (3,723
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net (loss) income applicable to common stock

$ (317,213 $ 595,604   $ 241,552  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Average common shares outstanding

  102,848,792     102,693,685     102,429,755  

Average potential dilutive common shares

  —       367,790     223,855  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Average common shares outstanding - assuming dilution

  102,848,792     103,061,475     102,653,610  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Basic EPS from continuing operations

$ (1.88 $ 5.41   $ 1.99  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Basic EPS from discontinued operations

$ (1.20 $ 0.39   $ 0.37  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Basic EPS

$ (3.08 $ 5.80   $ 2.36  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted EPS from continuing operations

$ (1.88 $ 5.39   $ 1.98  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Diluted EPS from discontinued operations

$ (1.20 $ 0.39   $ 0.37  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Diluted EPS

$ (3.08 $ 5.78   $ 2.35  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Potential common shares consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options and restricted stock awards using the treasury stock method. This method assumes that the potential common shares are issued and the proceeds from exercise, in addition to the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services, are used to purchase common stock at the exercise date. The difference between the number of potential shares issued and the shares purchased is added as incremental shares to the actual number of shares outstanding to compute diluted earnings per share. Warrants, stock options, and restricted stock awards that result in lower potential shares issued than shares purchased under the treasury stock method are not included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share since their inclusion would have an antidilutive effect in earnings per common share.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, there were 45,205 weighted average antidilutive stock options outstanding (2013 – 102,389; 2012 – 165,342). For the year ended December 31, 2014, the corporation has 628,009 unvested restricted stocks outstanding that were antidilutive.

 

312


Note 39 – Rental expense and commitments

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation was obligated under a number of non-cancelable leases for land, buildings, and equipment which require rentals as follows:

 

Year

   Minimum
payments [1]
 
     (In thousands)  

2015

   $ 56,129  

2016

     27,699  

2017

     22,225  

2018

     18,537  

2019

     16,603  

Later years

     114,379  
  

 

 

 
$ 255,572  
  

 

 

 

 

[1] Minimum payments have not been reduced by minimum non-cancelable sublease rentals due in the future of $3.7 million at December 31, 2014.

Total rental expense for all operating leases, except those with terms of a month or less that were not renewed, for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $35.0 million (2013 - $40.3 million; 2012 - $44.3 million), which is included in net occupancy, equipment and communication expenses, according to their nature.

Note 40 – Other service fees

The following table presents the major categories of other service fees for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Debit card fees

   $ 43,146      $ 41,912      $ 43,528  

Insurance fees

     54,158        52,309        51,363  

Credit card fees

     67,639        65,727        61,071  

Sale and administration of investment products

     27,711        35,272        37,766  

Trust fees

     18,209        17,285        16,353  

Processing fees

     —          —          6,330  

Other fees

     14,402        16,846        16,104  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other service fees

$ 225,265   $ 229,351   $ 232,515  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

313


Note 41 – FDIC loss share expense

The caption of FDIC loss share (expense) income in the consolidated statements of operations consists of the following major categories:

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Amortization of loss share indemnification asset

   $ (189,959    $ (161,635    $ (129,676

Reversal of accelerated amortization in prior periods

     12,492        —          —    

80% mirror accounting on credit impairment losses [1]

     32,038        60,454        58,187  

80% mirror accounting on reimbursable expenses

     58,117        50,985        30,771  

80% mirror accounting on recoveries on covered assets, including rental income on OREOs, subject to reimbursement to the FDIC

     (13,124      (16,057      (2,979

80% mirror accounting on amortization of contingent liability on unfunded commitments

     —          (473      (969

Change in true-up payment obligation

     (1,791      (15,993      (13,178

Other

     (797      668        1,633  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total FDIC loss share expense

$ (103,024 $ (82,051 $ (56,211
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

[1] Reductions in expected cash flows for ASC 310-30 loans, which may impact the provision for loan losses, may consider reductions in both principal and interest cash flow expectations. The amount covered under the FDIC loss sharing agreements for interest not collected from borrowers is limited under the agreements (approximately 90 days); accordingly, these amounts are not subject fully to the 80% mirror accounting.

 

As discussed in Note 1, the FDIC indemnity asset amortization for the year ended December 31, 2014 included a benefit of approximately $12.5 million to reverse the impact of accelerated amortization expense recorded in prior periods. This amount will be recognized as expense over the remaining portion of the Loss Sharing Agreement that expires in the quarter ending June 30, 2015.

During 2014, the Corporation revised its analysis of expected cash flows which resulted in a net decrease in estimated credit losses, which was driven mainly by commercial loan pools. Though this will have a positive impact on the Corporation’s interest accretion in future periods, the carrying value of the indemnification asset was amortized to reflect lower levels of expected losses. This amortization is recognized over the shorter of the remaining life of the loan pools, which had an average life of approximately six years, or the indemnification asset, which expires at June 30, 2015, for commercial, construction and consumer loans and June 30, 2020 for single-family residential mortgage loans.

Note 42 – Stock-based compensation

The Corporation maintained a Stock Option Plan (the “Stock Option Plan”), which permitted the granting of incentive awards in the form of qualified stock options, incentive stock options, or non-statutory stock options of the Corporation. In April 2004, the Corporation’s shareholders adopted the Popular, Inc. 2004 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Incentive Plan”), which replaced and superseded the Stock Option Plan. The adoption of the Incentive Plan did not alter the original terms of the grants made under the Stock Option Plan prior to the adoption of the Incentive Plan.

Stock Option Plan

Employees and directors of the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries were eligible to participate in the Stock Option Plan. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board had the absolute discretion to determine the individuals that were eligible to participate in the Stock Option Plan. This plan provided for the issuance of Popular, Inc.’s common stock at a price equal to its fair market value at the grant date, subject to certain plan provisions. The shares are to be made available from authorized but unissued shares of common stock or treasury stock. The Corporation’s policy has been to use authorized but unissued shares of common stock to cover each grant. The maximum option term is ten years from the date of grant. Unless an option agreement provides otherwise, all options granted are 20% exercisable after the first year and an additional 20% is exercisable after each subsequent year, subject to an acceleration clause at termination of employment due to retirement.

 

314


(Not in thousands)  
Exercise price per share     Options outstanding     Weighted-average
exercise price of
options outstanding
    Weighted-average
remaining life of options
outstanding in years
    Options exercisable
(fully vested)
    Weighted-average
exercise price of
options exercisable
 
$ 272.00        44,797     $ 272.00       0.12        44,797     $ 272.00  

There was no intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

The following table summarizes the stock option activity and related information:

 

(Not in thousands)

   Options outstanding      Weighted-average
exercise price
 

Outstanding at January 1, 2012

     206,946      $ 207.83  

Granted

     —          —    

Exercised

     —          —    

Forfeited

     —          —    

Expired

     (45,960      155.68  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2012

  160,986   $ 222.71  

Granted

  —       —    

Exercised

  —       —    

Forfeited

  —       —    

Expired

  (60,549   171.42  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

  100,437   $ 253.64  

Granted

  —       —    

Exercised

  —       —    

Forfeited

  —       —    

Expired

  (55,640   238.85  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

  44,797   $ 272.00  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

There was no stock option expense recognized for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Incentive Plan

The Incentive Plan permits the granting of incentive awards in the form of Annual Incentive Awards, Long-term Performance Unit Awards, Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Units or Performance Shares. Participants in the Incentive Plan are designated by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (or its delegate as determined by the Board). Employees and directors of the Corporation and/or any of its subsidiaries are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan.

Under the Incentive Plan, the Corporation has issued restricted shares, which become vested based on the employees’ continued service with Popular. Unless otherwise stated in an agreement, the compensation cost associated with the shares of restricted stock is determined based on a two-prong vesting schedule. The first part is vested ratably over five years commencing at the date of grant and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and 10 years of service. The vesting schedule for restricted shares granted on 2014 was modified as follows, the first part ratably over four years commencing at the date of the grant and the second part is vested at termination of employment after attainment of 55 years of age and 10 years of service or 60 years of age and 5 years of service. The four year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service or 60 years of age and 5 years of service. The five-year vesting part is accelerated at termination of employment after attaining 55 years of age and 10 years of service. The restricted shares granted, consistent with the requirements of the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“TARP”) Interim Final Rule, vest in two years from grant date.

 

315


The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members of management.

 

(Not in thousands)

   Restricted stock      Weighted-average
grant date fair value
 

Non-vested at January 1, 2012

     241,934      $ 31.98  

Granted

     359,427        17.72  

Vested

     (96,353      37.61  

Forfeited

     (13,785      26.59  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2012

  491,223   $ 20.59  

Granted

  229,131     28.20  

Vested

  (131,324   31.23  

Forfeited

  (3,783   24.63  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2013

  585,247   $ 21.16  

Granted

  365,831     29.86  

Vested

  (311,078   19.02  

Forfeited

  (11,991   29.33  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2014

  628,009   $ 27.13  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014, 365,831 shares of restricted stock (2013 - 229,131; 2012 - 359,427) were awarded to management under the Incentive Plan, from which 162,332 shares (2013 - 165,304; 2012 - 253,170) were awarded to management consistent with the requirements of the TARP Interim Final Rule.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation recognized $6.8 million of restricted stock expense related to management incentive awards, with a tax benefit of $1.1 million (2013 - $5.3 million, with a tax benefit of $1.7 million; 2012 - $4.3 million, with a tax benefit of $1.1 million). During the year ended December 31, 2014, the fair market value of the restricted stock vested was $5.8 million at grant date and $9.0 million at vesting date. This triggers a shortfall, net of windfalls, of $1.2 million of which $0.4 million was recorded as a windfall pool in additional paid in capital. No windfall pool was recorded for the remaining $0.8 million due to the valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset that was recorded as an additional income tax expense at the applicable income tax rate. No income tax expense was recorded for the U.S. employees due to the valuation allowance of the deferred tax asset. The total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested restricted stock awards to members of management at December 31, 2014 was $10.1 million and is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

The following table summarizes the restricted stock activity under the Incentive Plan for members of the Board of Directors:

 

(Not in thousands)

   Restricted stock      Weighted-average
grant date fair value
 

Nonvested at January 1, 2012

     —          —    

Granted

     41,174      $ 16.37  

Vested

     (41,174      16.37  

Forfeited

     —          —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2012

  —       —    

Granted

  20,930   $ 29.43  

Vested

  (20,930   29.43  

Forfeited

  —       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2013

  —       —    

Granted

  23,135   $ 30.43  

Vested

  (23,135   30.43  

Forfeited

  —       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-vested at December 31, 2014

  —       —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

316


During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Corporation granted 23,135 shares of restricted stock to members of the Board of Directors of Popular, Inc., which became vested at grant date (2013 - 20,930; 2012 – 41,174). During this period, the Corporation recognized $0.5 million of restricted stock expense related to these restricted stock grants, with a tax benefit of $57 thousand (2013 - $0.5 million, with a tax benefit of $0.2 million; 2012 - $0.4 million, with a tax benefit of $0.1 million). The fair value at vesting date of the restricted stock vested during the year ended December 31, 2014 for directors was $0.7 million.

Note 43 – Income taxes

The components of income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, are summarized in the following table.

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Current income tax expense:

        

Puerto Rico

   $ 7,814      $ 27,118      $ 108,090  

Federal and States

     6,953        10,309        998  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Subtotal

  14,767     37,427     109,088  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Deferred income tax expense (benefit):

Puerto Rico

  12,569     (90,796   (138,632

Federal and States

  2,861     (491   3,141  

Valuation allowance-Initial recognition

  8,034     —       —    

Adjustment for enacted changes in income tax laws

  20,048     (197,467   —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Subtotal

  43,512     (288,754   (135,491
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total income tax expense (benefit)

$ 58,279   $ (251,327 $ (26,403
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The reasons for the difference between the income tax expense (benefit) applicable to income before provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico, were as follows:

 

     2014     2013     2012  

(In thousands)

   Amount     % of pre-tax
income
    Amount     % of pre-tax
income
    Amount     % of pre-tax
income
 

Computed income tax at statutory rates

   $ (51,570     39   $ 135,720       39   $ 65,662       30

Benefit of net tax exempt interest income

     (55,862     43       (36,993     (11     (25,540     (12

Effect of income subject to preferential tax rate [1]

     (21,909     18       (137,793     (40     (78,132     (36

Deferred tax asset valuation allowance

     (4,281     3       (32,990     (9     166       —    

Non-deductible expenses [2]

     178,219       (135     32,115       9       23,093       11  

Difference in tax rates due to multiple jurisdictions

     (14,178     10       (12,029     (3     (6,034     (3

Initial adjustment in deferred tax due to change in tax rate

     20,048       (16     (197,467     (57     —         —    

Unrecognized tax benefits

     (3,601     3       (7,727     (2     (8,985     (4

Others

     11,413       (9     5,837       2       3,367       2  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

$ 58,279     (44 )%  $ (251,327   (72 )%  $ (26,403   (12 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

[1] Includes the impact of the Closing Agreement with the P.R. Treasury signed in June 2012, the tax expense related to a gain on the sale of EVERTEC shares and income from investments in subsidiaries subject to preferential tax rates and the Closing Agreement with the P.R. Treasury signed in 2014.
[2] For the year ended December 31, 2014, includes approximately $161.5 million of amortization of the discount and deferred cost associated with the TARP funds, which are not deductible.

 

317


On July 1, 2014, the Government of Puerto Rico approved certain amendments to the Internal Revenue Code, which, among other things, changed the income tax rate for capital gains from 15% to 20%. As a result, the Corporation recognized an income tax expense of $20.0 million mainly related to the deferred tax liability associated with the portfolio acquired from Westernbank.

During the second quarter of 2014 the Corporation entered into a Closing Agreement with the Puerto Rico Department of Treasury. The Agreement, among other matters, was related to the income tax treatment of certain charge-offs related to the loans acquired from Westernbank as part of the FDIC assisted transaction in the year 2010. As a result of the Agreement, the Corporation recorded a tax benefit of $23.4 million due to a reduction in the deferred tax liability associated with the Westernbank loan portfolio. Additionally, in connection with this Closing, the Corporation made an estimated tax payment of $45 million which will be used as a credit to offset future income tax liabilities.

In addition, as further discussed below, during 2014 an initial valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset of approximately $8.0 million was recorded at the Holding Company, due to the difference in the tax treatment of the interest expense related to the TARP funds and the newly issued $450 million of senior notes, bearing interest at 7%.

The results for the year ended December 31, 2013 reflect a tax benefit of $197.5 million, and a corresponding increase in the net deferred tax assets of the Puerto Rico operations as a result of the increase in the marginal tax rate from 30% to 39%. On June 30, 2013 the Governor of Puerto Rico signed Act Number 40 which includes several amendments to the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code. Among the most significant changes applicable to corporations was the increase in the marginal tax rate from 30% to 39% effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012. In addition, the Corporation recorded an income tax benefit of $146.4 million in connection with the loss generated on the Puerto Rico operations by the sales of non-performing assets that took place during the year 2013 and a tax expense of $23.7 million related to the gain realized on the sale of a portion of EVERTEC’s shares which was taxable at a preferential tax rate according to Act Number 73 of May 28, 2008, known as “Economic Incentives Act for the Development of Puerto Rico”.

The results for the year ended December 31, 2012 reflect a tax benefit of $72.9 million, related to the reduction of the deferred tax liability on the estimated gains for tax purposes related to the loans acquired from Westernbank (the “Acquired Loans”). In June 2012, the Puerto Rico Department of the Treasury (the “P.R. Treasury”) and the Corporation entered into a Closing Agreement (the “Closing Agreement”) to clarify that the Acquired Loans are a capital asset and any gain resulting from such loans will be taxed at the capital gain tax rate instead of the ordinary income tax rate, thus reducing the deferred tax liability on the estimated gain and recognizing an income tax benefit for accounting purposes.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and their tax bases. Significant components of the Corporation’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31 were as follows:

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014      December 31, 2013  

Deferred tax assets:

     

Tax credits available for carryforward

   $ 12,056      $ 8,195  

Net operating loss and other carryforward available

     1,261,413        1,269,523  

Postretirement and pension benefits

     111,677        51,742  

Deferred loan origination fees

     7,720        7,164  

Allowance for loan losses

     710,666        760,956  

Deferred gains

     7,500        9,313  

Accelerated depreciation

     7,915        7,577  

Intercompany deferred gains

     2,988        3,235  

Other temporary differences

     27,755        34,443  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total gross deferred tax assets

  2,149,690     2,152,148  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

Differences between the assigned values and the tax basis of assets and liabilities recognized in purchase business combinations

  37,804     37,938  

FDIC-assisted transaction

  81,335     79,381  

Unrealized net gain on trading and available-for-sale securities

  20,817      3,822  

Other temporary differences

  18,093     13,387  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total gross deferred tax liabilities

  158,049     134,528  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Valuation allowance

  1,212,748     1,257,977  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net deferred tax asset

$ 778,893   $ 759,643  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

318


The net deferred tax asset shown in the table above at December 31, 2014 is reflected in the consolidated statements of financial condition as $813 million in net deferred tax assets (in the “other assets” caption) (2013 - $762 million in deferred tax asset in the “other assets” caption) and $34 million in deferred tax liabilities (in the “other liabilities” caption) (2013 - $2 million in deferred tax liabilities in the “other liabilities” caption), reflecting the aggregate deferred tax assets or liabilities of individual tax-paying subsidiaries of the Corporation.

Included as part of the other carryforwards available are $47.2 million related to contributions to Banco Popular de Puerto Rico qualified pension plan and $57.8 million of other net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) primarily related to the loss on sale of non-performing assets that have no expiration date since they were realize through a single member limited liability company with partnership election. Additionally, the deferred tax asset related to the NOLs outstanding at December 31, 2014 expires as follows:

 

(In thousands)

      

2017

   $ 3,312  

2018

     14,928  

2019

     1  

2021

     76  

2022

     971  

2023

     1,248  

2024

     10,963  

2027

     51,452  

2028

     511,561  

2029

     198,224  

2030

     197,090  

2031

     139,512  

2032

     25,276  

2033

     1,757  
  

 

 

 
$ 1,156,371  
  

 

 

 

A deferred tax asset should be reduced by a valuation allowance if based on the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of more than 50%) that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be realized. The valuation allowance should be sufficient to reduce the deferred tax asset to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The determination of whether a deferred tax asset is realizable is based on weighting all available evidence, including both positive and negative evidence. The realization of deferred tax assets, including carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income of the same character during the carryback or carryforward period. The analysis considers all sources of taxable income available to realize the deferred tax asset, including the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences, future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards, taxable income in prior carryback years and tax-planning strategies.

The Corporations maintains a valuation allowance on its deferred tax asset for the U.S. operations, since in consideration of the requirement of ASC 740 management considered that it is more likely than not that all of this deferred tax asset will not be realized. For purposes of assessing the realization of the deferred tax assets in the U.S. mainland management evaluates and weights all available positive and negative evidence. The Corporation’s U.S. mainland operations are no longer in a cumulative loss position for the three-year period ended December 31, 2014 taking into account taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences

 

319


(“adjusted book income”). This represents positive evidence within management’s evaluation. The book income for the years 2013 and 2014 was significantly impacted by a reversal of the loan loss provision due to the improved credit quality of the loan portfolios. However, the U.S. mainland operations did not report taxable income for the years 2011, 2012 and 2013, although it did report taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2014. Future realization of the deferred tax assets ultimately depends on the existence of sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character within the carryforward period available under the tax law. The lack of a sustained level of taxable income together with the uncertainties regarding the estimate of future normalized level of profitability and cost savings related to the restructure represents strong negative evidence within management’s evaluation. This determination is updated each quarter and adjusted as any changes arise. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Corporation will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets related to the U.S. mainland operations, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740. If the Corporation is able to meet its operating targets in the U.S. and the results of the reorganization yield the expected results, this would be considered positive evidence within management’s evaluation which could outweigh the negative evidence and result in the realization of a portion of the fully reserved deferred tax asset recorded at PCB.

At December 31, 2014, the Corporation’s net deferred tax assets related to its Puerto Rico operations amounted to $812 million.

The Corporation’s Puerto Rico Banking operation is not in a cumulative loss position and has sustained profitability for the three year period ended December 31, 2014, exclusive of the loss generated on the sales of non performing assets that took place in 2013 which is not a continuing condition of the operations. This is considered a strong piece of objectively verifiable positive evidence that out weights any negative evidence considered by management in the evaluation of the realization of the deferred tax asset. Based on this evidence and management’s estimate of future taxable income, the Corporation has concluded that it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax asset of the Puerto Rico Banking operations will be realized.

The Holding Company operation is not in a cumulative loss position for the three year period ended December 31, 2014. However, after the payment of TARP, the interest expense that will be paid on the newly issued $450 million subordinated notes which partially funded the repayment of TARP funds in 2014, bearing interest at 7%, will be tax deductible contrary to the interest expense payable on the note issued to the U.S. Treasury under TARP. Based on this new fact pattern the Holding Company is expecting to have losses for income tax purposes exclusive of reversing temporary differences. Since as required by ASC 740 the historical information should be supplemented by all currently available information about future years, the expected losses in future years is considered by management a strong negative evidence that will suggest that income in future years will be insufficient to support the realization of all deferred tax asset. After weighting of all positive and negative evidence management concluded, as of the reporting date, that it is more likely than not that the Holding Company will not be able to realize any portion of the deferred tax assets, considering the criteria of ASC Topic 740. Accordingly, a valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset of $17.8 million was recorded during the year 2014.

Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, the Corporation and its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns. The Code provides a dividends-received deduction of 100% on dividends received from “controlled” subsidiaries subject to taxation in Puerto Rico and 85% on dividends received from other taxable domestic corporations.

The Corporation’s federal income tax provision for 2014 was $7.0 million (2013 – $4.4 million; 2012 – $4.4 million). The intercompany settlement of taxes paid is based on tax sharing agreements which generally allocate taxes to each entity based on a separate return basis.

The following table presents a reconciliation of unrecognized tax benefits.

 

(In millions)

      

Balance at January 1, 2013

   $ 13.4  

Additions for tax positions related to 2013

     1.2  

Additions for tax positions taken in prior years

     0.9  

Reduction as a result of lapse of statute of limitations

     (5.7
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

$ 9.8  

Additions for tax positions related to 2014

  1.1  

Reduction as a result of lapse of statute of limitations

  (2.5

Reduction for tax positions of prior years

  (0.4
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

$ 8.0  
  

 

 

 

 

320


At December 31, 2014, the total amount of interest recognized in the statement of financial condition approximated $3.1 million (2013 - $3.6 million). The total interest expense recognized during 2014 was $540 thousand (2013 - $1.4 million). Management determined that, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, there was no need to accrue for the payment of penalties. The Corporation’s policy is to report interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense, while the penalties, if any, are reported in other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

After consideration of the effect on U.S. federal tax of unrecognized U.S. state tax benefits, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, including U.S. and Puerto Rico that, if recognized, would affect the Corporation’s effective tax rate, was approximately $9.8 million at December 31, 2014 (2013 - $11.9 million).

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax returns due to the statute of limitations, changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity, and the addition or elimination of uncertain tax positions.

The Corporation and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in Puerto Rico, the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. states and political subdivisions, and foreign jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2014, the following years remain subject to examination: U.S. Federal jurisdiction – 2011 through 2014 and Puerto Rico – 2010 through 2014. The Corporation anticipates a reduction in the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months, which could amount to approximately $6.7 million.

Note 44 – Supplemental disclosure on the consolidated statements of cash flows

Additional disclosures on cash flow information and non-cash activities for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are listed in the following table:

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Income taxes paid

   $ 54,520      $ 51,047      $ 189,468  

Interest paid

     696,631        318,342        388,250  

Non-cash activities:

        

Loans transferred to other real estate

   $ 154,358      $ 228,009      $ 294,993  

Loans transferred to other property

     38,958        33,997        25,685  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans transferred to foreclosed assets

  193,316     262,006     320,678  

Transfers from loans held-in-portfolio to loans held-for-sale

  2,161,669     448,143     141,378  

Transfers from loans held-for-sale to loans held-in-portfolio

  41,293     27,016     10,325  

Loans securitized into investment securities [1]

  899,604     1,391,594     1,330,743  

Trades receivables from brokers and counterparties

  66,949     71,680     137,542  

Trades payable to brokers and counterparties

  2,000     3,576     3,581  

Recognition of mortgage servicing rights on securitizations or asset transfers

  12,583     19,262     18,495  

Loans sold to a joint venture in exchange for an acquisition loan and an equity interest in the joint venture

  —       194,514     —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Includes loans securitized into trading securities and subsequently sold before year end.

 

321


During the year ended December 31, 2014 BPNA completed the sale of its Illinois, Central Florida and California regional operations. As part of these transactions, BPNA made net cash disbursement of $206.0 million for consideration of the assets and liabilities sold, as follows:

 

(In thousands)

   December 31, 2014  

Loans held-for-sale

   $ 1,739,101  

Premises and equipment, net

     16,223  

Other assets

     16,853  

Deposits

     (2,009,816

Other liabilities

     (6,611
  

 

 

 

Net liabilities sold

$ (244,250
  

 

 

 

Note 45 – Segment reporting

The Corporation’s corporate structure consists of two reportable segments – Banco Popular de Puerto Rico and Banco Popular North America. These reportable segments pertain only to the continuing operations of Popular, Inc. As previously indicated in Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements, the regional operations in California, Illinois and Central Florida were classified as discontinued operations in the second quarter of 2014.

Management determined the reportable segments based on the internal reporting used to evaluate performance and to assess where to allocate resources. The segments were determined based on the organizational structure, which focuses primarily on the markets the segments serve, as well as on the products and services offered by the segments.

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico:

Given that Banco Popular de Puerto Rico constitutes a significant portion of the Corporation’s results of operations and total assets at December 31, 2014, additional disclosures are provided for the business areas included in this reportable segment, as described below:

 

   

Commercial banking represents the Corporation’s banking operations conducted at BPPR, which are targeted mainly to corporate, small and middle size businesses. It includes aspects of the lending and depository businesses, as well as other finance and advisory services. BPPR allocates funds across business areas based on duration matched transfer pricing at market rates. This area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR.

 

   

Consumer and retail banking represents the branch banking operations of BPPR which focus on retail clients. It includes the consumer lending business operations of BPPR, as well as the lending operations of Popular Auto and Popular Mortgage. Popular Auto focuses on auto and lease financing, while Popular Mortgage focuses principally on residential mortgage loan originations. The consumer and retail banking area also incorporates income related with the investment of excess funds from the branch network, as well as a proportionate share of the investment function of BPPR.

 

   

Other financial services include the trust and asset management service units of BPPR, the brokerage and investment banking operations of Popular Securities, and the insurance agency and reinsurance businesses of Popular Insurance, Popular Insurance V.I., Popular Risk Services, and Popular Life Re. Most of the services that are provided by these subsidiaries generate profits based on fee income.

Banco Popular North America:

Banco Popular North America’s reportable segment consists of the banking operations of BPNA, E-LOAN, Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. and Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. BPNA operates through a retail branch network in the U.S. mainland under the name of Popular Community Bank, while E-LOAN supports BPNA’s deposit gathering through its online platform. All direct lending activities at E-LOAN were ceased during the fourth quarter of 2008. Popular Equipment Finance, Inc. also holds a running-off loan portfolio as this subsidiary ceased originating loans during 2009. Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A. offers investment and insurance services across the BPNA branch network.

The Corporate group consists primarily of the holding companies: Popular, Inc., Popular North America, Popular International Bank and certain of the Corporation’s investments accounted for under the equity method, including EVERTEC and Centro Financiero BHD, S.A. The Corporate group also includes the expenses of certain corporate areas that are identified as critical to the organization: Finance, Risk Management and Legal.

 

322


The accounting policies of the individual operating segments are the same as those of the Corporation. Transactions between reportable segments are primarily conducted at market rates, resulting in profits that are eliminated for reporting consolidated results of operations.

The tables that follow present the results of operations and total assets by reportable segments:

 

December 31, 2014

 

(In thousands)

   Banco Popular
de Puerto Rico
     Banco Popular
North America
     Intersegment
Eliminations
 

Net interest income

   $ 1,288,889      $ 157,701      $ —    

Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses

     289,184        (18,850      —    

Non-interest income

     283,251        64,319        —    

Amortization of intangibles

     7,351        809        —    

Depreciation expense

     39,062        6,617        —    

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     —          532        —    

Other operating expenses

     884,289        184,369        —    

Income tax expense

     77,973        3,101        —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

$ 274,281   $ 45,442   $ —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 27,384,169   $ 5,503,433   $ (17,972
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

(In thousands)

   Reportable
Segments
     Corporate      Eliminations      Total Popular, Inc.  

Net interest income (expense)

   $ 1,446,590      $ (501,518    $ —        $ 945,072  

Provision (reversal of provision) for loan losses

     270,334        (200      —          270,134  

Non-interest income

     347,570        41,695        (2,750      386,515  

Amortization of intangibles

     8,160        —          —          8,160  

Depreciation expense

     45,679        648        —          46,327  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     532        —          —          532  

Other operating expenses

     1,068,658        72,759        (2,752      1,138,665  

Income tax expense (benefit)

     81,074        (22,796      1        58,279  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$ 319,723   $ (510,234 $ 1   $ (190,510
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 32,869,630   $ 4,937,372   $ (4,710,307 $ 33,096,695  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

(In thousands)

   Banco Popular
de Puerto Rico
     Banco Popular
North America
     Intersegment
Eliminations
 

Net interest income

   $ 1,260,537      $ 192,265      $ —    

Provision for loan losses

     616,883        (11,175      —    

Non-interest income

     281,894        36,252        —    

Amortization of intangibles

     7,162        809        —    

Depreciation expense

     38,282        6,839        —    

Other operating expenses

     943,444        153,207        —    

Income tax (benefit) expense

     (236,898      2,795        —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

$ 173,558   $ 76,042   $ —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 26,883,073   $ 8,724,784   $ (24,609
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

323


December 31, 2013

 

(In thousands)

   Reportable
Segments
     Corporate      Eliminations      Total Popular, Inc.  

Net interest income (expense)

   $ 1,452,802      $ (108,228    $ —        $ 1,344,574  

Provision for loan losses

     605,708        398        —          606,106  

Non-interest income

     318,146        475,663        (2,796      791,013  

Amortization of intangibles

     7,971        —          —          7,971  

Depreciation expense

     45,121        643        —          45,764  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     —          3,388        —          3,388  

Other operating expenses

     1,096,651        70,997        (2,781      1,164,867  

Income tax benefit

     (234,103      (17,082      (142      (251,327
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

$ 249,600   $ 309,091   $ 127   $ 558,818  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 35,583,248   $ 5,495,498   $ (5,329,413 $ 35,749,333  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

(In thousands)

   Banco Popular
de Puerto Rico
     Banco Popular
North America
     Intersegment
Eliminations
 

Net interest income

   $ 1,199,210      $ 186,680      $ —    

Provision for loan losses

     356,496        40,173        —    

Non-interest income

     401,417        37,141        —    

Amortization of intangibles

     7,351        810        —    

Depreciation expense

     37,321        5,785        —    

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     25,196        —          —    

Other operating expenses

     903,677        165,133        —    

Income tax expense

     (20,245      3,745        —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

$ 290,831   $ 8,175   $ —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 27,600,235   $ 8,651,790   $ (31,792
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

(In thousands)

   Reportable
Segments
     Corporate      Eliminations      Total Popular, Inc.  

Net interest income (expense)

   $ 1,385,890      $ (104,750    $ 487      $ 1,281,627  

Provision for loan losses

     396,669        404        —          397,073  

Non-interest income

     438,558        76,156        (3,225      511,489  

Amortization of intangibles

     8,161        —          —          8,161  

Depreciation expense

     43,106        1,258        —          44,364  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     25,196        —          —          25,196  

Other operating expenses

     1,068,810        71,579        (3,121      1,137,268  

Income tax expense (benefit)

     (16,500      (9,945      42        (26,403
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$ 299,006   $ (91,890 $ 341   $ 207,457  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 36,220,233   $ 5,308,327   $ (5,021,025 $ 36,507,535  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

324


Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular de Puerto Rico reportable segment are as follows:

 

December 31, 2014

 

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial
Banking
    Consumer
and Retail
Banking
    Other
Financial
Services
     Eliminations     Total Banco
Popular de
Puerto Rico
 

Net interest income

   $ 521,957     $ 757,721     $ 9,207      $ 4     $ 1,288,889  

Provision for loan losses

     138,213       150,971       —          —         289,184  

Non-interest (expense) income

     3,534       181,117       98,794        (194     283,251  

Amortization of intangibles

     4       6,836       511        —         7,351  

Depreciation expense

     16,407       21,551       1,104        —         39,062  

Other operating expenses

     254,146       562,345       67,992        (194     884,289  

Income tax expense

     22,899       38,825       16,249        —         77,973  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

$ 93,822   $ 158,310   $ 22,145   $ 4   $ 274,281  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 10,267,633   $ 18,895,974   $ 591,955   $ (2,371,393 $ 27,384,169  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial
Banking
    Consumer
and Retail
Banking
    Other
Financial
Services
     Eliminations     Total Banco
Popular de
Puerto Rico
 

Net interest income

   $ 493,836     $ 757,039     $ 9,662      $ —       $ 1,260,537  

Provision for loan losses

     180,228       436,655       —          —         616,883  

Non-interest (expense) income

     (41,362     224,080       99,243        (67     281,894  

Amortization of intangibles

     4       6,837       321        —         7,162  

Depreciation expense

     16,083       20,981       1,218        —         38,282  

Other operating expenses

     296,319       578,903       68,289        (67     943,444  

Income tax (benefit) expense

     (66,747     (182,471     12,320        —         (236,898
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

$ 26,587   $ 120,214   $ 26,757   $ —     $ 173,558  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 10,803,992   $ 18,083,293   $ 576,299   $ (2,580,511 $ 26,883,073  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

 

(In thousands)

   Commercial
Banking
    Consumer
and Retail
Banking
    Other
Financial
Services
     Eliminations     Total Banco
Popular de
Puerto Rico
 

Net interest income

   $ 424,467     $ 762,857     $ 11,882      $ 4     $ 1,199,210  

Provision for loan losses

     149,597       206,899       —          —         356,496  

Non-interest income

     19,426       269,190       112,949        (148     401,417  

Amortization of intangibles

     13       6,833       505        —         7,351  

Depreciation expense

     16,840       19,522       959        —         37,321  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     8,037       17,159       —          —         25,196  

Other operating expenses

     279,358       555,797       68,670        (148     903,677  

Income tax expense

     (33,068     (1,460     14,281        2       (20,245
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

$ 23,116   $ 227,297   $ 40,416   $ 2   $ 290,831  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 12,770,793   $ 19,668,009   $ 632,676   $ (5,471,243 $ 27,600,235  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

325


Additional disclosures with respect to the Banco Popular North America reportable segments are as follows:

 

December 31, 2014

 

Banco Popular North America

 

(In thousands)

   Banco Popular
North America
     E-LOAN      Eliminations      Total Banco
Popular North
America
 

Net interest income

   $ 154,806      $ 2,895      $ —        $ 157,701  

Reversal of provision for loan losses

     (16,416      (2,434      —          (18,850

Non-interest income

     61,982        2,337        —          64,319  

Amortization of intangibles

     809        —          —          809  

Depreciation expense

     6,617        —          —          6,617  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

     532        —          —          532  

Other operating expenses

     181,452        2,917        —          184,369  

Income tax expense

     3,101        —          —          3,101  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income

$ 40,693   $ 4,749   $ —     $ 45,442  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income ( loss)

$ 6,222,580   $ 255,757   $ (974,904 $ 5,503,433  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

Banco Popular North America

 

(In thousands)

   Banco Popular
North America
     E-LOAN      Eliminations      Total Banco
Popular North
America
 

Net interest income

   $ 189,229      $ 3,036      $ —        $ 192,265  

(Reversal of provision) provision for loan losses

     (13,998      2,823        —          (11,175

Non-interest income

     35,833        419        —          36,252  

Amortization of intangibles

     809        —          —          809  

Depreciation expense

     6,839        —          —          6,839  

Other operating expenses

     150,767        2,440        —          153,207  

Income tax expense

     4,012        (1,217      —          2,795  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$ 76,633   $ (591 $ —     $ 76,042  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 9,453,934   $ 315,712   $ (1,044,862 $ 8,724,784  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

Banco Popular North America

 

(In thousands)

   Banco Popular
North America
     E-LOAN      Eliminations      Total Banco
Popular North
America
 

Net interest income

   $ 183,222      $ 3,458      $ —        $ 186,680  

Provision for loan losses

     24,973        15,200        —          40,173  

Non-interest income

     34,026        3,115        —          37,141  

Amortization of intangibles

     810        —          —          810  

Depreciation expense

     5,785        —          —          5,785  

Other operating expenses

     162,309        2,824        —          165,133  

Income tax expense

     3,745        —          —          3,745  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

$ 19,626   $ (11,451 $ —     $ 8,175  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Segment assets

$ 9,378,779   $ 367,362   $ (1,094,351 $ 8,651,790  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Geographic Information

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Revenues: [1]

        

Puerto Rico

   $ 1,024,416       $ 1,838,657      $ 1,492,796  

United States

     223,264        218,295        202,177  

Other

     83,907        78,635        98,143  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total consolidated revenues

$ 1,331,587    $ 2,135,587   $ 1,793,116  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

326


[1] Total revenues include net interest income (expense), service charges on deposit accounts, other service fees, mortgage banking activities, net gain (loss) and valuation adjustments on investment securities, trading account (loss) profit, net (loss) gain on sale of loans and valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale, adjustments to indemnity reserves on loans sold, FDIC loss share (expense) income and other operating income.

Selected Balance Sheet Information

 

(In thousands)

   2014      2013      2012  

Puerto Rico

        

Total assets

   $ 26,276,561      $ 25,714,758      $ 26,582,248  

Loans

     17,704,170        18,107,764        18,484,977  

Deposits

     20,365,445        19,730,408        19,984,830  

United States

        

Total assets

   $ 5,689,604      $ 8,897,535      $ 8,816,143  

Loans

     3,568,564        5,839,115        5,852,705  

Deposits

     3,442,084        6,007,159        6,049,168  

Other

        

Total assets

   $ 1,130,530      $ 1,137,040      $ 1,109,144  

Loans

     780,483        759,840        755,950  

Deposits [1]

     1,000,006        973,578        966,615  

 

[1] Represents deposits from BPPR operations located in the US and British Virgin Islands.

Note 46 – Subsequent events

Subsequent events are events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before the financial statements are issued. The effects of subsequent events and transactions are recognized in the financial statements when they provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date. The Corporation has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to December 31, 2014.

On February 27, 2015, the Corporation’s Puerto Rico banking subsidiary, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico (“BPPR”), in an alliance with co-bidders, including the Corporation’s U.S. mainland banking subsidiary, Banco Popular North America, doing business as Popular Community Bank (“PCB”), had acquired certain assets and all deposits (other than certain brokered deposits) of Doral Bank from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) as receiver.

Under the FDIC’s bidding format, BPPR was the lead bidder and party to the purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC covering all assets and deposits to be acquired by it and its alliance co-bidders. BPPR entered into back to back purchase and assumption agreements with the alliance co-bidders for the transferred assets and deposits.

After taking into account the transfers to the unaffiliated alliance co-bidders, BPPR and PCB together assumed approximately $2.3 billion in deposits and acquired approximately $1.8 billion in performing commercial and residential loans, including:

 

   

BPPR assumed approximately $612 million in deposits associated with eight of the 18 Puerto Rico branches of Doral Bank and approximately $431 million from its online deposit platform, and approximately $848 million in performing Puerto Rico residential and commercial loans. BPPR purchased the loans at an aggregate discount of 4.71% or $40 million and paid an aggregate premium of 0.93% or $10 million for the deposits it assumed.

 

   

PCB assumed approximately $1.3 billion in deposits in three New York branches of Doral Bank, and acquired approximately $931 million in performing commercial loans primarily in the New York metropolitan area. PCB purchased the loans at an aggregate premium of 0.57% or $5 million and paid an aggregate premium of 1.99% or $ 25 million for the deposits it assumed.

In addition, on February 27, 2015, the FDIC, as Receiver for Doral Bank, awarded BPPR the mortgage servicing rights for a loan portfolio of approximately $5 billion in unpaid principal balance, for a purchase price currently estimated at $48.6 million. The transfers of the mortgage servicing rights are subject to a number of specified closing conditions, including the consent of each of Ginnie Mae, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in a form acceptable to BPPR, and other customary closing conditions. The transfers are expected to close within the next 60 days, subject to the conditions described above.

There is no loss-sharing arrangement with the FDIC on the acquired assets.

The other co-bidders that formed part of the alliance led by BPPR are FirstBank Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico; Centennial Bank, Conway, Arkansas; and an affiliate of J.C. Flowers III LP. In connection with the transaction, FirstBank acquired 10 Doral Bank branches in Puerto Rico with approximately $625 million in deposits and $325 million in residential loans from BPPR; Centennial Bank acquired five Doral Bank branches in Florida (all outside of PCB’s area of focus in the state) with approximately $466 million in deposits and $42 million in loans from BPPR; and an affiliate of J.C. Flowers III LP acquired approximately $316 million in commercial real estate loans in the United States from BPPR. BPPR has entered into customary transition service agreements with each of the alliance co-bidders.

The transaction was completed based on December 31, 2014 balances and is subject to customary true-up and purchase accounting adjustments through the date of the close. The $1.8 billion in loans and $2.3 billion in deposits acquired by Popular in the transaction did not include any non-performing assets and do not enjoy a loss sharing agreement with the FDIC.

Note 47 – Popular, Inc. (holding company only) financial information

The following condensed financial information presents the financial position of Popular, Inc. Holding Company only at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014.

Condensed Statements of Condition

 

     December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014      2013  

ASSETS

     

Cash and due from banks (includes $20,269 due from bank subsidiary (2013 - $10,411))

   $ 20,448      $ 10,595  

Money market investments

     19,747        18,721  

Trading account securities

     1,640        1,353  

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

     231        204  

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value (includes $8,725 in common securities from statutory trusts (2013 - $9,725)) [1]

     9,850        10,850  

Investment in BPPR and subsidiaries, at equity

     3,389,529        3,127,745  

Investment in Popular North America and subsidiaries, at equity

     1,221,670        1,511,335  

Investment in other non-bank subsidiaries, at equity

     267,667        217,486  

Advances to subsidiaries

     53,769        519,500  

Loans to affiliates

     —          —    

Other loans

     1,717        1,592  

Less - Allowance for loan losses

     41        304  

Premises and equipment

     2,512        2,135  

Investment in equity method investees

     47,837        41,248  

Other assets (includes $867 due from subsidiaries and affiliate (2013 - $1,085))

     20,845        25,947  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 5,057,421   $ 5,488,407  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Notes payable

$ 740,812   $ 822,351  

Other liabilities (includes $4,583 due to subsidiaries and affiliate (2013 - $929))

  49,226     39,906  

Stockholders’ equity

  4,267,383     4,626,150  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 5,057,421   $ 5,488,407  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

[1] Refer to Note 26 to the consolidated financial statements for information on the statutory trusts.

 

327


Condensed Statements of Operations

 

     Years ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013      2012  

Income:

       

Dividends from subsidiaries

   $ —       $ 37,000      $ 5,000  

Interest income (includes $1,829 due from subsidiaries and affiliates (2013 - $17,551; 2012 - $22,891))

     1,931       17,793        23,038  

Earnings from investments in equity method investees

     12,291       17,308        40,505  

Other operating income

     —         425,968        1,461  

Gain on sale and valuation adjustment of investment securities

     —         7,966        —    

Trading account (loss) profit

     (40     161        214  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total income

  14,182     506,196     70,218  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Expenses:

Interest expense

  492,657     101,245     95,898  

(Reversal of provision) provision for loan losses

  (200   398     404  

Operating expenses (include expenses for services provided by subsidiaries and affiliate of $6,882 (2013 - $8,412; 2012 - $9,487)), net of reimbursement by subsidiaries for services provided by parent of $67,021 (2013 - $60,402; 2012 - $58,577)

  1,633     700     1,705  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total expenses

  494,090     102,343     98,007  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes and equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

  (479,908   403,853     (27,789

Income taxes

  5,580     1,412     1,702  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

(Loss) income before equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

  (485,488   402,441     (29,491

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

  294,978     156,377     236,948  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

(Loss) income from continuing operations

  (190,510   558,818     207,457  

Equity in undistributed (losses) earnings of discontinued operations

  (122,980   40,509     37,818  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

$ (313,490 $ 599,327   $ 245,275  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

$ (354,617 $ 513,450   $ 184,955  
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

328


Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

 

     Year ended December 31,  

(In thousands)

   2014     2013     2012  

Cash flows from operating activities:

      

Net (loss) income

   $ (313,490   $ 599,327     $ 245,275  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating activities:

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries and dividends from subsidiaries

  (171,998   (196,886   (274,766

(Reversal of provision) provision for loan losses

  (200   398     404  

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

  404,461     30,467     29,058  

Earnings from investments under the equity method

  (12,291   (17,308   (40,505

Deferred income tax (benefit) expense

  8,203     (10,937   (14,109

(Gain) loss on:

Sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities

  —       (2,110   —    

Sale of stock in equity method investee

  —       (416,113   —    

Net (increase) decrease in:

Trading securities

  (288   (94   (1,259

Other assets

  4,736     7,747     9,351  

Net increase (decrease) in:

Interest payable

  7,066     2,704     —    

Other liabilities

  (180   (5,507   2,581  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total adjustments

  239,509     (607,639   (289,245
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

  (73,981   (8,312   (43,970
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net (increase) decrease in money market investments

  (1,026   (147   23,665  

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  —       35,000     —    

Other

  1,000     —       —    

Proceeds from sale of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  —       5,438     —    

Capital contribution to subsidiaries

  (100,000   (272,500   (103,500

Net decrease (increase) in advances to subsidiaries and affiliates

  465,731     (234,014   (36,400

Net (originations) repayments on other loans

  (279   269     138  

Return of capital from equity method investments

  210,000     —       150,194  

Proceeds from sale of stock in equity method investee

  —       481,377     —    

Acquisition of premises and equipment

  (1,075   (352   (691

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment

  48     33     73  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

  574,399     15,104     33,479  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

Payments of notes payable and subordinated notes

  (936,000   —       —    

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

  450,000     —       —    

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  5,394     6,860     9,402  

Dividends paid

  (3,723   (3,723   (3,723

Repurchase of TARP-related warrants

  (3,000   —       —    

Net payments for repurchase of common stock

  (3,236   (437   (450
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

  (490,565   2,700     5,229  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

  9,853     9,492     (5,262

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  10,595     1,103     6,365  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 20,448   $ 10,595   $ 1,103  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Popular, Inc. (parent company only) received dividend distributions from its direct equity method investees amounting to $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 (2013 - $4 million).

Notes payable include junior subordinated debentures issued by the Corporation that are associated to capital securities issued by the Popular Capital Trust I, Popular Capital Trust II and Popular Capital Trust III and medium-term notes. Refer to Note 26 for a description of significant provisions related to these junior subordinated debentures. The following table presents the aggregate amounts by contractual maturities of notes payable at December 31, 2014:

 

Year

   (In thousands)  

2015

   $ —    

2016

     —    

2017

     —    

2018

     —    

2019

     450,000  

Later years

     290,812  
  

 

 

 

Total

$ 740,812  
  

 

 

 

 

329


Note 48 – Condensed consolidating financial information of guarantor and issuers of registered guaranteed securities

The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the financial position of Popular, Inc. Holding Company (“PIHC”) (parent only), Popular North America, Inc. (“PNA”) and all other subsidiaries of the Corporation at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of their operations and cash flows for periods ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

PNA is an operating, wholly-owned subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Equity One, Inc. and Banco Popular North America (“BPNA”), including BPNA’s wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular Equipment Finance, Inc., Popular Insurance Agency, U.S.A., and E-LOAN, Inc.

PIHC fully and unconditionally guarantees all registered debt securities issued by PNA.

Popular International Bank, Inc. (“PIBI”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PIHC and is the holding company of its wholly-owned subsidiaries Popular Insurance V.I., Inc. In July 2013, the Corporation completed the sale of Tarjetas y Transacciones en Red Tranred,C.A., which was a wholly owned subsidiary of PIBI. Effective January 1, 2012, PNA, which was a wholly-owned subsidiary of PIBI prior to that date, became a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of PIHC after an internal reorganization. Since the internal reorganization, PIBI is no longer a bank holding company and is no longer a potential issuer of the Corporation’s debt securities. PIBI has no outstanding registered debt securities that would also be guaranteed by PIHC.

A potential source of income for PIHC consists of dividends from BPPR and BPNA. Under existing federal banking regulations any dividend from BPPR or BPNA to the PIHC could be made if the total of all dividends declared by each entity during the calendar year would not exceed the total of its net income for that year, as defined by the Federal Reserve Board, combined with its retained net income for the preceding two years, less any required transfers to surplus or to a fund for the retirement of any preferred stock. At December 31, 2014, BPPR could have declared a dividend of approximately $542 million (December 31, 2013 - $504 million). On October 20, 2014, the Memorandum of Understanding (the “FRB-NY MOU”) entered into on July 20, 2011 among Popular, Inc., BPPR, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the “FRB-NY”) and the Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions of Puerto Rico was terminated. The FRB-NY MOU provided, among other things, for the Corporation to take steps to improve its credit risk management practices and asset quality, and for the Corporation to develop strategic plans to improve earnings and to develop capital plans. The FRB-NY MOU also required the Corporation to obtain approval from the applicable FRB-NY MOU counterparties prior to, among other things, declaring or paying dividends, purchasing or redeeming any shares of its stock, consummating acquisitions or mergers, or making any distributions on its trust preferred securities or subordinated debentures. On January 9, 2015, another Memorandum of Understanding entered into among BPNA, the FRB-NY and the New York State Department of Financial Services (the “NYSDFS”), effective on July 25, 2011, was also terminated. This Memorandum of Understanding provided that BPNA could not declare dividends without the approval of the FRB-NY and the NYSDFS.

 

330


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Financial Condition

 

     At December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Popular Inc.
Holding Co.
    PNA
Holding Co.
    All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
    Elimination
entries
    Popular, Inc.
Consolidated
 

Assets:

          

Cash and due from banks

   $ 20,448     $ 608     $ 380,890     $ (20,851   $ 381,095  

Money market investments

     19,747       357       1,803,639       (1,357     1,822,386  

Trading account securities, at fair value

     1,640       —         136,887       —         138,527  

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

     231       —         5,314,928       —         5,315,159  

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost

     —         —         103,170       —         103,170  

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value

     9,850       4,492       147,564       —         161,906  

Investment in subsidiaries

     4,878,866       1,353,616       —         (6,232,482     —    

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value

     —         —         106,104       —         106,104  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  55,486     —       19,496,569     (53,769   19,498,286  

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  —       —       2,542,662     —       2,542,662  

Less - Unearned income

  —       —       93,835     —       93,835  

Allowance for loan losses

  41     —       601,751     —       601,792  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio, net

  55,445     —       21,343,645     (53,769   21,345,321  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FDIC loss share asset

  —       —       542,454     —       542,454  

Premises and equipment, net

  2,512     —       492,069     —       494,581  

Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  90     —       135,410     —       135,500  

Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  —       —       130,266     —       130,266  

Accrued income receivable

  75     112     121,657     (26   121,818  

Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value

  —       —       148,694     —       148,694  

Other assets

  67,962     26,514     1,570,094     (18,127   1,646,443  

Goodwill

  —       —       465,677     (1   465,676  

Other intangible assets

  555     —       37,040     —       37,595  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 5,057,421   $ 1,385,699   $ 32,980,188   $ (6,326,613 $ 33,096,695  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Deposits:

Non-interest bearing

$ —     $ —     $ 5,804,599   $ (20,851 $ 5,783,748  

Interest bearing

  —       —       19,025,144     (1,357   19,023,787  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deposits

  —       —       24,829,743     (22,208   24,807,535  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

  —       —       1,271,657     —       1,271,657  

Other short-term borrowings

  —       8,169     66,800     (53,769   21,200  

Notes payable

  740,812     148,988     822,028     —       1,711,828  

Other liabilities

  49,226     6,872     974,147     (18,216   1,012,029  

Liabilities from discontinued operations

  —       —       5,064     —       5,064  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  790,038     164,029     27,969,439     (94,193   28,829,313  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock

  50,160     —       —       —       50,160  

Common stock

  1,036     2     56,307     (56,309   1,036  

Surplus

  4,187,931     4,269,208     5,931,161     (10,191,842   4,196,458  

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

  262,244     (3,043,476   (747,702   3,782,651     253,717  

Treasury stock, at cost

  (4,116   —       (1   —       (4,117

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  (229,872   (4,064   (229,016   233,080     (229,872
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

  4,267,383     1,221,670     5,010,749     (6,232,420   4,267,382  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 5,057,421   $ 1,385,699   $ 32,980,188   $ (6,326,613 $ 33,096,695  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

331


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Financial Condition

 

     At December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
    PNA
Holding Co.
    All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
    Elimination
entries
    Popular, Inc.
Consolidated
 

Assets:

          

Cash and due from banks

   $ 10,595     $ 616     $ 422,967     $ (10,967   $ 423,211  

Money market investments

     18,721       4,804       839,732       (4,804     858,453  

Trading account securities, at fair value

     1,353       —         338,390       —         339,743  

Investment securities available-for-sale, at fair value

     204       —         5,294,596       —         5,294,800  

Investment securities held-to-maturity, at amortized cost

     —         —         140,496       —         140,496  

Other investment securities, at lower of cost or realizable value

     10,850       4,492       166,410       —         181,752  

Investment in subsidiaries

     4,856,566       1,670,809       —         (6,527,375     —    

Loans held-for-sale, at lower of cost or fair value

     —         —         110,426       —         110,426  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans held-in-portfolio:

Loans not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  521,092     —       21,702,418     (519,500   21,704,010  

Loans covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  —       —       2,984,427     —       2,984,427  

Less - Unearned income

  —       —       92,144     —       92,144  

Allowance for loan losses

  304     —       640,251     —       640,555  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans held-in-portfolio, net

  520,788     —       23,954,450     (519,500   23,955,738  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

FDIC loss share asset

  —       —       948,608     —       948,608  

Premises and equipment, net

  2,135     —       517,381     —       519,516  

Other real estate not covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  —       —       135,501     —       135,501  

Other real estate covered under loss sharing agreements with the FDIC

  —       —       168,007     —       168,007  

Accrued income receivable

  64     114     131,368     (10   131,536  

Mortgage servicing assets, at fair value

  —       —       161,099     —       161,099  

Other assets

  66,577     19,407     1,642,760     (41,186   1,687,558  

Goodwill

  —       —       647,757     —       647,757  

Other intangible assets

  554     —       44,578     —       45,132  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

$ 5,488,407   $ 1,700,242   $ 35,664,526   $ (7,103,842 $ 35,749,333  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:

Deposits:

Non-interest bearing

$ —     $ —     $ 5,933,649   $ (10,967 $ 5,922,682  

Interest bearing

  —       —       20,793,267     (4,804   20,788,463  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deposits

  —       —       26,726,916     (15,771   26,711,145  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

  —       —       1,659,292     —       1,659,292  

Other short-term borrowings

  —       —       920,700     (519,500   401,200  

Notes payable

  822,351     149,663     612,740     —       1,584,754  

Other liabilities

  39,906     39,245     728,899     (41,258   766,792  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

  862,257     188,908     30,648,547     (576,529   31,123,183  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock

  50,160     —       —       —       50,160  

Common stock

  1,034     2     56,079     (56,081   1,034  

Surplus

  4,161,625     4,479,208     6,056,774     (10,527,455   4,170,152  

Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)

  602,957     (2,940,509   (907,972   3,839,954     594,430  

Treasury stock, at cost

  (881   —       —       —       (881

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

  (188,745   (27,367   (188,902   216,269     (188,745
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

  4,626,150     1,511,334     5,015,979     (6,527,313   4,626,150  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

$ 5,488,407   $ 1,700,242   $ 35,664,526   $ (7,103,842 $ 35,749,333  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

332


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

 

     Year ended December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
    PNA
Holding Co.
    All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
    Elimination
entries
    Popular, Inc.
Consolidated
 

Interest and dividend income:

          

Loans

   $ 1,294     $ —       $ 1,478,658     $ (1,202   $ 1,478,750  

Money market investments

     20       7       4,219       (22     4,224  

Investment securities

     617       322       131,692       —         132,631  

Trading account securities

     —         —         17,938       —         17,938  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest and dividend income

  1,931     329     1,632,507     (1,224   1,633,543  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense:

Deposits

  —       —       105,095     (8   105,087  

Short-term borrowings

  —       405     68,187     (1,216   67,376  

Long-term debt

  492,657     10,826     12,525     —       516,008  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

  492,657     11,231     185,807     (1,224   688,471  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest (expense) income

  (490,726   (10,902   1,446,700     —       945,072  

Provision for loan losses- non-covered loans

  (200   —       224,199     —       223,999  

Provision for loan losses- covered loans

  —       —       46,135     —       46,135  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses

  (490,526   (10,902   1,176,366     —       674,938  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

  —       —       158,637     —       158,637  

Other service fees

  —       —       228,006     (2,741   225,265  

Mortgage banking activities

  —       —       30,615     —       30,615  

Net loss and valuation adjustments on investment securities

  —       —       (870   —       (870

Trading account (loss) profit

  (40   —       4,398     —       4,358  

Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

  —       —       40,591     —       40,591  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  —       —       (40,629   —       (40,629

FDIC loss share expense

  —       —       (103,024   —       (103,024

Other operating income (loss)

  12,291     (16   59,306     (9   71,572  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest income (loss)

  12,251     (16   377,030     (2,750   386,515  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

  39,457     —       379,222     —       418,679  

Net occupancy expenses

  3,952     —       82,755     —       86,707  

Equipment expenses

  3,764     —       45,153     —       48,917  

Other taxes

  1,019     —       55,899     —       56,918  

Professional fees

  14,963     1,119     266,202     (229   282,055  

Communications

  496     —       25,188     —       25,684  

Business promotion

  1,731     —       52,285     —       54,016  

FDIC deposit insurance

  —       —       40,307     —       40,307  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

  —       —       532     —       532  

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

  6     —       49,605     —       49,611  

Other operating expenses

  (63,755   435     161,216     (2,523   95,373  

Amortization of intangibles

  —       —       8,160     —       8,160  

Restructuring costs

  —       —       26,725     —       26,725  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  1,633     1,554     1,193,249     (2,752   1,193,684  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  (479,908   (12,472   360,147     2     (132,231

Income tax expense

  5,580     —       52,698     1     58,279  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  (485,488   (12,472   307,449     1     (190,510

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

  294,978     32,484     —       (327,462   —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) Income from continuing operations

  (190,510   20,012     307,449     (327,461   (190,510

Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax

  —       —       (122,980   —       (122,980

Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations

  (122,980   (122,980   —       245,960     —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (Loss) Income

$ (313,490 $ (102,968 $ 184,469   $ (81,501 $ (313,490
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

$ (354,617 $ (79,665 $ 144,355   $ (64,690 $ (354,617
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

333


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

 

     Year ended December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
    PNA
Holding Co.
    All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
    Elimination
entries
    Popular, Inc.
Consolidated
 

Interest and dividend income:

          

Dividend income from subsidiaries

   $ 37,000     $ —       $ —       $ (37,000   $ —    

Loans

     4,543       —         1,478,526       (1,973     1,481,096  

Money market investments

     127       5       3,462       (130     3,464  

Investment securities

     13,123       322       139,427       (11,065     141,807  

Trading account securities

     —         —         21,573       —         21,573  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest and dividend income

  54,793     327     1,642,988     (50,168   1,647,940  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense:

Deposits

  —       —       124,862     (5   124,857  

Short-term borrowings

  —       974     39,555     (2,099   38,430  

Long-term debt

  101,245     24,249     25,650     (11,065   140,079  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

  101,245     25,223     190,067     (13,169   303,366  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest (expense) income

  (46,452   (24,896   1,452,921     (36,999   1,344,574  

Provision for loan losses- non-covered loans

  398     —       536,312     —       536,710  

Provision for loan losses- covered loans

  —       —       69,396     —       69,396  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses

  (46,850   (24,896   847,213     (36,999   738,468  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

  —       —       162,870     —       162,870  

Other service fees

  —       —       232,148     (2,797   229,351  

Mortgage banking activities

  —       —       71,657     —       71,657  

Net gain and valuation adjustments on investment securities

  7,966     —       —       —       7,966  

Trading account profit (loss)

  161     —       (13,644   —       (13,483

Net loss on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

  —       —       (52,708   —       (52,708

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  —       —       (37,054   —       (37,054

FDIC loss share expense

  —       —       (82,051   —       (82,051

Other operating income

  443,276     4,012     57,177     —       504,465  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest income

  451,403     4,012     338,395     (2,797   791,013  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating expenses:

Personnel costs

  31,086     —       397,611     —       428,697  

Net occupancy expenses

  3,685     2     82,964     —       86,651  

Equipment expenses

  4,084     —       41,944     —       46,028  

Other taxes

  413     —       57,615     —       58,028  

Professional fees

  13,099     72     265,181     (225   278,127  

Communications

  421     —       24,964     —       25,385  

Business promotion

  1,838     —       57,615     —       59,453  

FDIC deposit insurance

  —       —       56,728     —       56,728  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

  —       3,388     —       —       3,388  

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

  —       —       79,658     —       79,658  

Other operating expenses

  (53,926   434     147,923     (2,555   91,876  

Amortization of intangibles

  —       —       7,971     —       7,971  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  700     3,896     1,220,174     (2,780   1,221,990  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  403,853     (24,780   (34,566   (37,016   307,491  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  1,412      (1,710   (250,887   (142   (251,327
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  402,441     (23,070   216,321     (36,874   558,818  

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

  156,377     54,417     —       (210,794   —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from continuing operations

  558,818     31,347     216,321     (247,668   558,818  

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

  —       —       40,509     —       40,509  

Equity in undistributed losses of discontinued operations

  40,509     40,509     —       (81,018   —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Income

$ 599,327   $ 71,856   $ 256,830   $ (328,686 $ 599,327  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

$ 513,450   $ (5,897 $ 173,754   $ (167,857 $ 513,450  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

334


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations

 

     Year ended December 31, 2012  

(In thousands)

   Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
    PNA
Holding Co.
    All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
    Elimination
entries
    Popular, Inc.
Consolidated
 

Interest and Dividend Income:

          

Dividend income from subsidiaries

   $ 5,000     $ —       $ —       $ (5,000   $ —    

Loans

     6,733       —         1,445,886       (3,392     1,449,227  

Money market investments

     14       25       3,707       (43     3,703  

Investment securities

     16,291       322       163,179       (11,160     168,632  

Trading account securities

     —         —         22,824       —         22,824  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest and dividend income

  28,038     347     1,635,596     (19,595   1,644,386  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest Expense:

Deposits

  —       —       167,790     (25   167,765  

Short-term borrowings

  6     151     50,055     (3,410   46,802  

Long-term debt

  95,892     32,183     31,765     (11,648   148,192  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest expense

  95,898     32,334     249,610     (15,083   362,759  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest (expense) income

  (67,860   (31,987   1,385,986     (4,512   1,281,627  

Provision for loan losses- non-covered loans

  404     —       321,830     —       322,234  

Provision for loan losses- covered loans

  —       —       74,839     —       74,839  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest (expense) income after provision for loan losses

  (68,264   (31,987   989,317     (4,512   884,554  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

  —       —       171,226     —       171,226  

Other service fees

  —       —       235,739     (3,224   232,515  

Mortgage banking activities

  —       —       84,771     —       84,771  

Net gain and valuation adjustments on investment securities

  —       —       (1,707   —       (1,707

Trading account profit

  214     —       4,264     —       4,478  

Net gain on sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held-for-sale

  —       —       (29,414   —       (29,414

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  —       —       (21,198   —       (21,198

FDIC loss share (expense) income

  —       —       (56,211   —       (56,211

Other operating income (loss)

  41,966     707     84,356     —       127,029  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-interest income (loss)

  42,180     707     471,826     (3,224   511,489  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating Expenses:

Personnel costs

  29,779     —       404,554     —       434,333  

Net occupancy expenses

  3,434     3     81,250     —       84,687  

Equipment expenses

  3,831     —       39,787     —       43,618  

Other taxes

  2,209     —       47,635     —       49,844  

Professional fees

  11,042     42     260,680     (756   271,008  

Communications

  464     —       25,223     —       25,687  

Business promotion

  1,823     —       58,961     —       60,784  

FDIC deposit insurance

  —       —       82,065     —       82,065  

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

  —       —       25,196     —       25,196  

Other real estate owned (OREO) expenses

  —       —       28,823     —       28,823  

Other operating expenses

  (50,877   441     153,584     (2,365   100,783  

Amortization of intangibles

  —       —       8,161     —       8,161  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total operating expenses

  1,705     486     1,215,919     (3,121   1,214,989  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income tax and equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  (27,789   (31,766   245,224     (4,615   181,054  

Income tax expense (benefit)

  1,702     —       (28,147   42     (26,403
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before equity in earnings of subsidiaries

  (29,491   (31,766   273,371     (4,657   207,457  

Equity in undistributed earnings (losses) of subsidiaries

  236,948     (4,935   —       (232,013   0  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$ 207,457   $ (36,701 $ 273,371   $ (236,670 $ 207,457  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

  —       —       37,818     —       37,818  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity in undistributed earnings of discontinued operations

  37,818     37,818     —       (75,636   —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

  245,275   $ 1,117     311,189     (312,306   245,275  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income, net of tax

$ 184,955   $ (5,444 $ 248,507   $ (243,063 $ 184,955  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

335


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

 

     Year ended December 31, 2014  

(In thousands)

   Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
    PNA
Holding Co.
    All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
    Elimination
entries
    Popular, Inc.
Consolidated
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

          

Net (loss) income

   $ (313,490   $ (102,968   $ 184,469     $ (81,501   $ (313,490
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

Equity in undistributed (earnings) losses of subsidiaries

  (171,998   90,496     —       81,502     —    

(Reversal of provision) provision for loan losses

  (200   —       263,569     —       263,369  

Goodwill impairment losses

  —       —       186,511     —       186,511  

Amortization of intangibles

  —       —       9,434     —       9,434  

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

  648     —       46,489     —       47,137  

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

  404,461     —       (125,885   —       278,576  

Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights

  —       —       24,683     —       24,683  

FDIC loss share expense

  —       —       103,024     —       103,024  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  —       —       40,629     —       40,629  

Earnings from investments under the equity method

  (12,291   16     (27,303   —       (39,578

Deferred income tax expense

  8,203     —       35,308     1     43,512  

Loss (gain) on:

Disposition of premises and equipment

  1     —       (1,717   —       (1,716

Sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities

  —       —       870     —       870  

Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held for sale and mortgage banking activities

  —       —       (88,724   —       (88,724

Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs

  —       —       28,005     —       28,005  

Disposal of discontinued business

  —       —       (38,355   —       (38,355

Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale

  —       —       (308,600   —       (308,600

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale

  —       —       123,375     —       123,375  

Net originations on loans held-for-sale

  —       —       (753,312   —       (753,312

Net (increase) decrease in:

Trading securities

  (288   —       1,105,662     —       1,105,374  

Accrued income receivable

  (12   2     9,712     17     9,719  

Other assets

  4,099     (7,124   158,585     (23,060   132,500  

Net increase (decrease) in:

Interest payable

  7,066     20     (7,776   (17   (707

Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations

  —       —       (10,171   —       (10,171

Other liabilities

  (180   (32,391   40,449     23,059     30,937  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total adjustments

  239,509     51,019     814,462     81,502     1,186,492  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

  (73,981   (51,949   998,931     1     873,002  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net (increase) decrease in money market investments

  (1,026   4,447     (963,907   (3,447   (963,933

Purchases of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  —       —       (2,001,940   —       (2,001,940

Held-to-maturity

  —       —       (1,000   —       (1,000

Other

  —       —       (110,010   —       (110,010

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  —       —       1,722,650     —       1,722,650  

Held-to-maturity

  —       —       39,962     —       39,962  

Other

  1,000     —       91,752     —       92,752  

Proceeds from sale of investment securities:

Available for sale

  —       —       310,210     —       310,210  

Other

  —       —       37,104     —       37,104  

Net repayments on loans

  465,452     —       776,179     (465,731   775,900  

Proceeds from sale of loans

  —       —       355,145     —       355,145  

Acquisition of loan portfolios

  —       —       (389,067   —       (389,067

Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements

  —       —       256,498     —       256,498  

Cash paid related to business acquisitions

  —       —       (6,330   —       (6,330

Capital contribution to subsidiary

  (100,000   —       —       100,000     —    

Return of capital from wholly-owned subsidiaries

  210,000     250,000     —       (460,000   —    

Net cash disbursed from disposal of discontinued business

  —       —       (205,895   —       (205,895

Acquisition of premises and equipment

  (1,075   —       (49,971   —       (51,046

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment

  48     —       14,289     —       14,337  

Foreclosed assets

  —       —       150,115     —       150,115  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

  574,399     254,447     25,784     (829,178   25,452  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in:

Deposits

  —       —       115,453     (6,438   109,015  

Federal funds purchased and assets sold under agreements to repurchase

  —       —       (387,635   —       (387,635

Other short-term borrowings

  —       8,169     (853,900   465,731     (380,000

Payments of notes payable

  (936,000   (675   (122,615   —       (1,059,290

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

  450,000     —       331,905     —       781,905  

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  5,394     —       —       —       5,394  

Dividends paid

  (3,723   —       —       —       (3,723

Repurchase of TARP-related warrants

  (3,000   —       —       —       (3,000

Net payments for repurchase of common stock

  (3,236   —       —       —       (3,236

Return of capital to parent company

  —       (210,000   (250,000   460,000     —    

Capital contribution from parent

  —       —       100,000     (100,000   —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in financing activities

  (490,565   (202,506   (1,066,792   819,293     (940,570
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

  9,853     (8   (42,077   (9,884   (42,116

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  10,595     616     422,967     (10,967   423,211  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 20,448   $ 608   $ 380,890   $ (20,851 $ 381,095  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations.

 

336


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

 

     Year ended December 31, 2013  

(In thousands)

   Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
    PNA
Holding Co.
    All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
    Elimination
entries
    Popular, Inc.
Consolidated
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

          

Net income

   $ 599,327     $ 71,856     $ 256,830     $ (328,686   $ 599,327  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

  (196,886   (94,926   —       291,812     —    

Provision for loan losses

  398     —       602,165     —       602,563  

Amortization of intangibles

  —       —       9,883     —       9,883  

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

  641     2     47,519     —       48,162  

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

  30,467     444     (109,915   —       (79,004

Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights

  —       —       11,403     —       11,403  

FDIC loss share expense

  —       —       82,051     —       82,051  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  —       —       37,054     —       37,054  

Earnings from investments under the equity method

  (17,308   (3,946   (21,619   —       (42,873

Deferred income tax benefit

  (10,937   (1,710   (275,965   (142   (288,754

Loss (gain) on:

Disposition of premises and equipment

  49     (66   (3,375   —       (3,392

Sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities

  (2,110   —       —       —       (2,110

Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held for sale and mortgage banking activities

  —       —       22,411     —       22,411  

Sale of stock in equity method investee

  (416,113   —       —       —       (416,113

Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs

  —       —       50,740     —       50,740  

Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale

  —       —       (390,018   —       (390,018

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale

  —       —       218,379     —       218,379  

Net originations on loans held-for-sale

  —       —       (1,049,474   —       (1,049,474

Net (increase) decrease in:

Trading securities

  (94   —       1,430,929     —       1,430,835  

Accrued income receivable

  1,612     (2   (7,104   (315   (5,809

Other assets

  5,445     (1,818   (3,027   2,227     2,827  

Net increase (decrease) in:

Interest payable

  2,704     (506   (4,663   (1   (2,466

Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations

  —       —       10,635     —       10,635  

Other liabilities

  (5,507   (2,370   (17,179   (1,896   (26,952
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total adjustments

  (607,639   (104,898   640,830     291,685     219,978  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

  (8,312   (33,042   897,660     (37,001   819,305  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net (increase) decrease in money market investments

  (147   (3,937   227,274     3,937     227,127  

Purchases of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  —       —       (2,257,976   —       (2,257,976

Held-to-maturity

  —       —       (250   —       (250

Other

  —       —       (178,093   —       (178,093

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  35,000     —       1,788,474     —       1,823,474  

Held-to-maturity

  —       —       4,632     —       4,632  

Other

  —       —       181,784     —       181,784  

Proceeds from sale of investment securities:

Available for sale

  5,438     —       —       —       5,438  

Net (originations) repayments on loans

  (233,745   —       625,364     289,200     680,819  

Proceeds from sale of loans

  —       —       333,021     —       333,021  

Acquisition of loan portfolios

  —       —       (1,592,603   —       (1,592,603

Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements

  —       —       396,223     —       396,223  

Return of capital from equity method investments

  —       491      —       —       491  

Proceeds from sale of sale of stock in equity method investee

  481,377     —       —       —       481,377  

Capital contribution to subsidiary

  (272,500   —       —       272,500     —    

Mortgage servicing rights purchased

  —       —       (45   —       (45

Acquisition of premises and equipment

  (352   —       (38,221   —       (38,573

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment

  33     180     9,877     —       10,090  

Foreclosed assets

  —       —       226,063     —       226,063  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

  15,104     (3,266   (274,476   565,637     302,999  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in:

Deposits

  —       —       (310,417   (12,987   (323,404

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

  —       —       (357,460   —       (357,460

Other short-term borrowings

  —       —       54,200     (289,200   (235,000

Payments of notes payable

  —       (236,200   (95,831   —       (332,031

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

  —       —       106,739     —       106,739  

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  6,860     —       —       —       6,860  

Dividends paid to parent company

  —       —       (37,000   37,000     —    

Dividends paid

  (3,723   —       —       —       (3,723

Net payments for repurchase of common stock

  (437   —       —       —       (437

Capital contribution from parent

  —       272,500     —       (272,500   —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  2,700     36,300     (639,769   (537,687   (1,138,456
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks

  9,492     (8   (16,585   (9,051   (16,152

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  1,103     624     439,552     (1,916   439,363  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 10,595   $ 616   $ 422,967   $ (10,967 $ 423,211  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows include the cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities associated with discontinued operations.

 

337


Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows

 

     Year ended December 31, 2012  

(In thousands)

   Popular, Inc.
Holding Co.
    PNA
Holding Co.
    All other
subsidiaries and
eliminations
    Elimination
entries
    Popular, Inc.
Consolidated
 

Cash flows from operating activities:

          

Net income

   $ 245,275     $ 1,117     $ 311,189     $ (312,306   $ 245,275  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:

Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

  (274,766   (32,883   —       307,649     —    

Provision for loan losses

  404     —       408,537     —       408,941  

Amortization of intangibles

  —       —       10,072     —       10,072  

Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment

  653     3     46,080     —       46,736  

Net accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums and deferred fees

  29,058     112     (66,582   (487   (37,899

Fair value adjustments on mortgage servicing rights

  —       —       17,406     —       17,406  

FDIC loss share expense

  —       —       56,211     —       56,211  

Amortization of prepaid FDIC assessment

  —       —       32,778     —       32,778  

Adjustments (expense) to indemnity reserves on loans sold

  —       —       21,198     —       21,198  

Earnings from investments under the equity method

  (40,505   (706   (32,267   —       (73,478

Deferred income tax benefit

  (14,109   —       (121,424   42     (135,491

Loss (gain) on:

Disposition of premises and equipment

  2     —       (8,621   —       (8,619

Sale and valuation adjustments of investment securities

  —       —       1,707     —       1,707  

Sale of loans, including valuation adjustments on loans held for sale and mortgage banking activities

  —       —       (48,765   —       (48,765

Sale of other assets

  —       —       (2,545   —       (2,545

Sale of foreclosed assets, including write-downs

  —       —       (4,511   —       (4,511

Acquisitions of loans held-for-sale

  —       —       (417,108   —       (417,108

Proceeds from sale of loans held-for-sale

  —       —       325,014     —       325,014  

Net disbursements on loans held-for-sale

  —       —       (1,233,240   —       (1,233,240

Net (increase) decrease in:

Trading securities

  (1,259   —       1,389,169     —       1,387,910  

Accrued income receivable

  (163   —       (405   49     (519

Other assets

  8,859     313     (11,972   (16,590   (19,390

Net increase (decrease) in:

Interest payable

  —       (126   (9,091   53     (9,164

Pension and other postretirement benefits obligations

  —       —       (40,241   —       (40,241

Other liabilities

  2,581     (25   (473   (235   1,848  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total adjustments

  (289,245   (33,312   310,927     290,481     278,851  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

  (43,970   (32,195   622,116     (21,825   524,126  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

Net decrease (increase) in money market investments

  23,665     (315   290,990     (23,746   290,594  

Purchases of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  —       —       (1,843,922   —       (1,843,922

Held-to-maturity

  —       —       (25,792   —       (25,792

Other

  —       —       (212,419   —       (212,419

Proceeds from calls, paydowns, maturities and redemptions of investment securities:

Available-for-sale

  —       —       1,636,723     —       1,636,723  

Held-to-maturity

  —       —       9,751      —       9,751  

Other

  —       —       206,856     —       206,856  

Proceeds from sale of investment securities:

Available for sale

  —       —       52,058     —       52,058  

Net (disbursements) repayments on loans

  (36,262   —       628,963     36,305     629,006  

Proceeds from sale of loans

  —       —       68,396     —       68,396  

Acquisition of loan portfolios

  —       —       (1,357,628   —       (1,357,628

Net payments from FDIC under loss sharing agreements

  —       —       462,016     —       462,016  

Return of capital from equity method investments

  150,194     1,002     —       —       151,196  

Capital contribution to subsidiary

  (103,500   —       —       103,500     —    

Mortgage servicing rights purchased

  —       —       (2,231   —       (2,231

Acquisition of premises and equipment

  (691   —       (54,208   —       (54,899

Proceeds from sale of:

Premises and equipment

  73     —       19,768     —       19,841  

Other productive assets

  —       —       1,026     —       1,026  

Foreclosed assets

  —       —       206,070     —       206,070  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by investing activities

  33,479     687     86,417     116,059     236,642  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in:

Deposits

  —       —       (991,097   21,501     (969,596

Assets sold under agreements to repurchase

  —       —       (148,405   24,060     (124,345

Other short-term borrowings

  —       (30,500   406,900     (36,400   340,000  

Payments of notes payable

  —       (41,800   (173,098   —       (214,898

Proceeds from issuance of notes payable

  —       —       106,923     —       106,923  

Proceeds from issuance of common stock

  9,402     —       —       —       9,402  

Dividends paid to parent company

  —       —       (5,000   5,000     —    

Dividends paid

  (3,723   —       —       —       (3,723

Payments for repurchase of common stock

  (450   —       —       —       (450

Capital contribution from parent

  —       103,500     —       (103,500   —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  5,229     31,200     (803,777   (89,339   (856,687
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash and due from banks

  (5,262   (308   (95,244   4,895     (95,919

Cash and due from banks at beginning of period

  6,365     932     534,796     (6,811   535,282  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks at end of period

$ 1,103   $ 624   $ 439,552   $ (1,916 $ 439,363  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

338

Exhibit 21.1

Popular, Inc.

Subsidiaries of the Registrant

 

Name

  

Jurisdiction of Incorporation

Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

   Puerto Rico

Popular Auto LLC

   Puerto Rico

BP Faros del Oeste SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP TL at 2014 SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Isabela del Mar SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Las Palmas at Villa Franca SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Boqueron Country Club SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Apadh SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Mansiones de Manantiales SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Coral SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Miraflores SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP 650 Plaza SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Portfolio Holdings LLC

   Delaware

BP El Caribe Building SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Galicia del Mar SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP PCC SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Grand Bay SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Ocean Plaza SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Aventura SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP San Juan Park SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Coamo Springs SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Hacienda Bonita SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Miramelinda Estate SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Monte Rey Industrial SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Villas de Campomar SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Estancias de Parra SPV, LLC

   Delaware

BP Villa Tania SPV, LLC

   Delaware

Popular Insurance LLC

   Puerto Rico

Popular Securities LLC

   Puerto Rico

Popular Risk Services LLC

   Puerto Rico

Popular Life RE

   Puerto Rico

Popular Capital Trust I

   Delaware

Popular Capital Trust II

   Delaware

Popular International Bank, Inc.

   Puerto Rico

Popular Insurance V.I., Inc.

   U.S. Virgin Islands

Popular North America, Inc.

   Delaware

Banco Popular North America

   New York

Popular Equipment Finance, Inc.

   Delaware

Popular Insurance Agency USA, Inc.

   Delaware

E-LOAN, Inc.

   Delaware

Equity One, Inc.

   Delaware

Popular ABS, Inc.

   Delaware

BanPonce Trust I

   Delaware

Popular North America Capital Trust I

   Delaware

EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-182213 and 333-182210) and Form S-8 (Nos. 333-169011, 333-161810, 333-153044, 333-145272, 333-128909, 333-115482, 333-60666, 333-53114, 333-80167, 333-193162 and 333-188257) of Popular, Inc. of our report dated March 2, 2015 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report to Stockholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Juan, Puerto Rico
March 2, 2015

LOGO

 

CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT 31.1

I, Richard L. Carrión, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Popular, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 2, 2015

 

By:

/s/ Richard L. Carrión

Richard L. Carrión
Chief Executive Officer

LOGO

 

CERTIFICATION EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Carlos J. Vázquez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Popular, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: March 2, 2015

 

By:

/s/ Carlos J. Vázquez

Carlos J. Vázquez
Chief Financial Officer

LOGO

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Popular, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 2, 2015

 

By:

/s/_Richard L. Carrión

Name: Richard L. Carrión
Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

LOGO

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Popular, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: March 2, 2015

 

By:

/s/ Carlos J. Vázquez

Name: Carlos J. Vázquez
Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

LOGO

EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 31 C.F.R. § 30.15

I, Richard L. Carrión, certify, based on my knowledge, that:

 

(i) The Compensation Committee of Popular, Inc. has discussed, reviewed, and evaluated with Senior Risk Officer at least every six months during the fiscal year 2014, senior executive officer (SEO) compensation plans and employee compensation plans and the risks these plans pose to Popular, Inc.;

 

(ii) The Compensation Committee of Popular, Inc. has identified and limited during the fiscal year 2014 any features of the SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of Popular, Inc. and has identified any features of the employee compensation plans that pose risks to Popular, Inc. and has limited those features to ensure that Popular, Inc. is not unnecessarily exposed to risks;

 

(iii) The Compensation Committee has reviewed, at least every six months during the fiscal year 2014, the terms of each employee compensation plan and identified any features of the plan that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of Popular, Inc. to enhance the compensation of an employee, and has limited any such features;

 

(iv) The Compensation Committee of Popular Inc. will certify to the reviews of the SEO compensation plans and employee compensation plans required under (i) and (iii) above;

 

(v) The Compensation Committee of Popular, Inc. will provide a narrative description of how it limited during the fiscal year 2014 the features in

 

  (A) SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of Popular, Inc.;

 

  (B) Employee compensation plans that unnecessarily expose Popular, Inc. to risks; and

 

  (C) Employee compensation plans that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of Popular, Inc. to enhance the compensation of a an employee;

 

(vi) Popular, Inc. has required that bonus payments to SEOs or any of the next twenty most highly compensated employees, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA (bonus payments), be subject to a recovery or “clawback” provision during any part of the fiscal year 2014 if the bonus payment were based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria;

 

(vii) Popular Inc. has prohibited any golden parachute payment, as defined in the regulation and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, to a SEO or any of the next five most highly compensated employees during any part of the fiscal year 2014;

 

(viii) Popular Inc. has limited bonus payments to its applicable employees in accordance with section 111 of EESA and the regulations and guidance established thereunder during any part of the fiscal year 2014;

 

(ix) Popular Inc. and its employees have complied with the excessive or luxury expenditures policy, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section111 of EESA, during the fiscal year 2014; and any expenses that, pursuant to the policy, required approval of the Board of Directors, a Committee of the Board of Directors, an SEO, or an executive officer with similar level of responsibility were properly approved;

 

(x) Popular Inc. will permit a non-binding shareholder resolution in compliance with any applicable federal securities rules and regulations on the disclosures provided under the federal securities laws related to SEO compensation paid or accrued during any part of the fiscal year 2014;

 

(xi) Popular Inc. will disclose the amount, nature, justification for the offering, during any part of the fiscal year 2014, of any perquisites, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, whose total value exceeds $25,000 for any employee who is subject to the bonus payments limitations identified in paragraph (viii);

 

(xii) Popular Inc. will disclose whether Popular Inc., the Board of Directors of Popular Inc., or the Compensation Committee of Popular Inc. has engaged during any part of the fiscal year 2014 a compensation consultant; and the services the compensation consultant or any affiliate of the compensation consultant provided during this period;


(xiii) Popular Inc. has prohibited the payment of any gross-ups, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, to the SEOs and the next twenty most highly compensated employees during any part of fiscal year 2014;

 

(xiv) Popular Inc. has substantially complied with all other requirements related to employee compensation that are provided in the agreement between Popular Inc. and Treasury, including any amendments;

 

(xv) Popular Inc. has submitted to Treasury a complete and accurate lists of the SEOs and the twenty next most highly compensated employees for the current fiscal year, with the non-SEOs ranked in descending order of level of annual compensation, and with the name, title, and employer of each SEO and most highly compensated employee identified; and

 

(xvi) I understand that a knowing and willful false or fraudulent statement made in connection with this certification may be punished by fine, imprisonment, or both. (See, for example, 18 U.S.C. 1001.)

Dated: March 2, 2015

 

/s/ Richard L. Carrión

Richard L. Carrión
Chief Executive Officer
Popular, Inc.

 

LOGO

EXHIBIT 99.2

Certification Pursuant to 31 C.F.R. § 30.15

I, Carlos J. Vázquez, certify, based on my knowledge, that:

(i) The Compensation Committee of Popular, Inc. has discussed, reviewed, and evaluated with Senior Risk Officer at least every six months during the fiscal year 2014, senior executive officer (SEO) compensation plans and employee compensation plans and the risks these plans pose to Popular, Inc.;

(ii) The Compensation Committee of Popular, Inc. has identified and limited during the fiscal year 2014 any features of the SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of Popular, Inc. and has identified any features of the employee compensation plans that pose risks to Popular, Inc. and has limited those features to ensure that Popular, Inc. is not unnecessarily exposed to risks;

(iii) The Compensation Committee has reviewed, at least every six months during the fiscal year 2014, the terms of each employee compensation plan and identified any features of the plan that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of Popular, Inc. to enhance the compensation of an employee, and has limited any such features;

(iv) The Compensation Committee of Popular Inc. will certify to the reviews of the SEO compensation plans and employee compensation plans required under (i) and (iii) above;

(v) The Compensation Committee of Popular, Inc. will provide a narrative description of how it limited during the fiscal year 2014 the features in:

 

  (A) SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of Popular, Inc.;

 

  (B) Employee compensation plans that unnecessarily expose Popular, Inc. to risks; and

 

  (C) Employee compensation plans that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of Popular, Inc. to enhance the compensation of a an employee;

(vi) Popular, Inc. has required that bonus payments to SEOs or any of the next twenty most highly compensated employees, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA (bonus payments), be subject to a recovery or “clawback” provision during any part of the fiscal year 2014 if the bonus payment were based on materially inaccurate financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria;

(vii) Popular Inc. has prohibited any golden parachute payment, as defined in the regulation and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, to a SEO or any of the next five most highly compensated employees during any part of the fiscal year 2014;

(viii) Popular Inc. has limited bonus payments to its applicable employees in accordance with section 111 of EESA and the regulations and guidance established thereunder during any part of the fiscal year 2014;

(ix) Popular Inc. and its employees have complied with the excessive or luxury expenditures policy, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, during the fiscal year 2014; and any expenses that, pursuant to the policy, required approval of the Board of Directors, a Committee of the Board of Directors, an SEO, or an executive officer with similar level of responsibility were properly approved;

(x) Popular Inc. will permit a non-binding shareholder resolution in compliance with any applicable federal securities rules and regulations on the disclosures provided under the federal securities laws related to SEO compensation paid or accrued during any part of the fiscal year 2014;

(xi) Popular Inc. will disclose the amount, nature, justification for the offering, during any part of the fiscal year 2014, of any perquisites, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, whose total value exceeds $25,000 for any employee who is subject to the bonus payments limitations identified in paragraph (viii);

(xii) Popular Inc. will disclose whether Popular Inc., the Board of Directors of Popular Inc., or the Compensation Committee of Popular Inc. has engaged during any part of the fiscal year 2014 a compensation consultant; and the services the compensation consultant or any affiliate of the compensation consultant provided during this period;

(xiii) Popular Inc. has prohibited the payment of any gross-ups, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, to the SEOs and the next twenty most highly compensated employees during any part of fiscal year 2014;


(xiv) Popular Inc. has substantially complied with all other requirements related to employee compensation that are provided in the agreement between Popular Inc. and Treasury, including any amendments;

(xv) Popular Inc. has submitted to Treasury a complete and accurate lists of the SEOs and the twenty next most highly compensated employees for the current fiscal year, with the non-SEOs ranked in descending order of level of annual compensation, and with the name, title, and employer of each SEO and most highly compensated employee identified; and

(xvi) I understand that a knowing and willful false or fraudulent statement made in connection with this certification may be punished by fine, imprisonment, or both. (See, for example, 18 U.S.C. 1001.)

Dated: March 2, 2015

 

/s/ Carlos J. Vázquez

Carlos J. Vázquez
Chief Financial Officer
Popular, Inc.