RISK FACTORS

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors and the other information included in this prospectus before deciding to purchase shares of our common stock. Any of these risks may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. Consequently, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment. The risks described below are those known to us and that we currently believe may materially affect us. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also negatively affect us.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

The restaurant industry in general, and the specialty and fine-dining segment in particular, are affected by changes in economic conditions, including continuing effects from the recent recession, which could negatively affect our guest traffic, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Dining at restaurants is a discretionary activity for consumers, and, therefore, we are subject to the effects of any economic conditions. Our restaurants cater to both business and social guests. Accordingly, our business is susceptible to economic factors that may result in reduced discretionary spending by our clientele. We also believe that consumers generally tend to make fewer discretionary expenditures, including for high-end restaurant meals, during periods of actual or perceived negative economic conditions. The recession from late 2007 to mid-2009 reduced consumer confidence to historic lows, impacting the public’s ability and desire to spend discretionary dollars as a result of job losses, home foreclosures, significantly reduced home values, investment losses, bankruptcies and reduced access to credit, resulting in lower levels of customer traffic and lower average check sizes in our restaurants. Changes in spending habits as a result of another economic slowdown, inflation or lower consumer confidence are likely to decrease the number of restaurant guests and average revenue per guest and put pressure on pricing, which would adversely affect our business and financial performance.

The United States, Brazil or the specific markets in which we operate may suffer from depressed economic activity, recessionary economic cycles, higher fuel or energy costs, low consumer confidence, high levels of unemployment, reduced home values, increases in home foreclosures, investment losses, personal bankruptcies, reduced access to credit or other economic factors that may affect consumer discretionary spending. During the recent economic crisis and recession, our business was materially adversely affected by a significant decrease in revenues from our restaurants in the United States and Brazil due to adverse economic conditions in those areas. If negative economic conditions persist for a long period of time or become more pervasive, consumers might make long-lasting changes to their discretionary spending behavior, including dining out less frequently on a permanent basis and generating lower average check sizes at our restaurants. If restaurant revenue decreases, our profitability could decline as we spread fixed costs across a lower level of revenue. Reductions in staff levels, asset impairment charges and potential restaurant closures could result from prolonged negative restaurant sales. There can be no assurance that the macroeconomic environment or the regional economics in which we operate will improve significantly or that government stimulus efforts will improve consumer confidence, liquidity, credit markets, home values or unemployment, among other things.

The future performance of the United States and Brazilian economies is uncertain and may be affected by economic, political and other factors that are beyond our control. These factors, which also affect consumer spending on restaurant meals, include, among others, national, regional and local economic conditions, levels of disposable consumer income, consumer confidence and the effects of geopolitical incidents. We believe that any negative developments relating to these factors, whether actual or perceived, could adversely impact our business and financial performance.

We face significant competition from other restaurant companies, which could adversely affect our business and financial performance and make it difficult to expand in new and existing markets.

We must compete successfully with other restaurant companies in existing or new markets in order to maintain and enhance our overall financial performance. The restaurant industry in the United States, Brazil and internationally is highly competitive in terms of price, quality of service, restaurant location, atmosphere, and type and quality of food. We compete with restaurant chains and independently owned restaurants (including, among others, churrascaria operators) for guests, restaurant locations and experienced management and staff. Some of our competitors have

16

Table of Contents

greater financial and other resources, have been in business for a longer period of time, have greater name recognition and are more established in the markets where we currently operate and where we plan to open new restaurants. Any inability to compete successfully with other restaurant companies may harm our ability to maintain or increase our revenue, force us to close one or more of our restaurants or limit our ability to expand our restaurant base. Restaurant closings would reduce our revenue and could subject us to significant costs, including severance payments to employees, write-downs of leasehold improvements, equipment, furniture and fixtures, and legal expenses. In addition, we could remain liable for remaining future lease obligations for any terminated restaurant locations.

Churrascaria operators and other competitors in the steakhouse sector of our industry have continued to open restaurants in recent years. If we overestimate demand for our restaurants or underestimate the popularity of competing restaurants, we may be unable to realize anticipated revenue from existing or new restaurants. Similarly, if any of our competitors opens additional restaurants in existing or targeted markets, we may realize lower than expected revenue from our restaurants. Any decrease in the number of restaurant guests for any of our existing or new restaurants due to competition could reduce our revenue and adversely affect our business and financial performance, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Our Brazilian operations, and any other future international operations, expose us to economic, regulatory and other risks associated with such countries.

We have long-standing operations in Brazil, where we now have 10 restaurants. Our Brazilian restaurants accounted for 25.9% of our total revenue in 2013, 23.7% in 2014 and 19.6% in the thirteen weeks ended March 30, 2014 and 15.8% in the thirteen weeks ended March 29, 2015. While we do not currently operate any restaurants outside of the United States, Brazil and our joint venture restaurant in Mexico, we intend to expand into other international markets in the future. Our lack of experience in operating restaurants outside of the United States and Brazil increases the risk that any international expansion efforts that we may undertake may not be successful. In addition, international operations, including our operations in Brazil and Mexico, subject us to a number of risks, including:

We may begin to operate in countries known to have a reputation for corruption and are subject to the US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (“FCPA”), the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) regulations, other United States laws and regulations governing our international operations and similar laws in other countries. Any violation of the FCPA, OFAC regulations or other applicable anti-corruption laws, by us, our affiliated entities or their respective officers, directors, employees and agents could result in substantial fines, sanctions, civil and/or criminal penalties and curtailment of operations in certain jurisdictions and could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or our availability of funds under our revolving line of credit. Further, detecting, investigating, and resolving actual or alleged violations is expensive and can consume significant time and attention of our management.

If we are unable to account for these risks while operating abroad, our reputation and brand value could be harmed. The occurrence of any of these risks could negatively affect our Brazilian operations and any future expansion into new geographic markets, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

17

Table of Contents

We are a multinational organization faced with increasingly complex tax issues in the jurisdictions in which we operate, including in Brazil, and we could be obligated to pay additional taxes in those jurisdictions.

As a multinational organization that operates in several jurisdictions, including the United States and Brazil, we may be subject to taxation in jurisdictions with increasingly complex tax laws, the application of which can be uncertain. The tax positions that we have taken or may take in the future may be subject to challenge on audit, and the authorities in these jurisdictions, including Brazil, could successfully assert that we are obligated to pay additional taxes, interest and penalties. In addition, the amount of taxes we pay could increase substantially as a result of changes in the applicable tax principles, including increased tax rates, new tax laws or revised interpretations of existing tax laws and precedents, which could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and operating results. The authorities could also claim that various withholding requirements apply to us or our subsidiaries or assert that benefits of tax treaties are not available to us or our subsidiaries, any of which could have a material impact on us and the results of our operations.

Brazilian economic, political and other conditions, and Brazilian government policies or actions in response to these conditions, may negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial performance, as well as the market price of our common stock.

The Brazilian economy has been characterized by frequent and occasionally extensive intervention by the Brazilian government and unstable economic cycles. The Brazilian government has often changed monetary, taxation, credit, tariff and other policies to influence the course of the country’s economy. For example, the government’s actions to control inflation have at times involved setting wage and price controls, imposing exchange controls and limiting imports into Brazil. Additionally, in March and April of 2015, a series of protests began in Brazil against the current government and President. The initial protests occurred in cities throughout Brazil, including in Rio de Janeiro and Sao Paolo, on March 15, with protestors generally reported to number around a million, and continued throughout the remainder of March and into April. We have no control over, and cannot predict, what policies or actions the Brazilian government may take in the future, including in response to recent protesting activities. These factors, as well as uncertainty over whether the Brazilian government may implement changes in policy or regulations relating to these factors, could adversely affect us and our business, results of operations, financial performance and the market price of our common stock. We cannot predict what policies may be implemented by the Brazilian federal or state governments and whether these policies will negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects may be adversely affected by exchange control policies, interest rates, liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets, social and political instability, and other economic, political, diplomatic and social developments affecting Brazil.

The Brazilian government regularly implements changes to tax regimes that may increase our tax burden. These changes include modifications in the rate of assessments, non-renewal of existing tax relief and, on occasion, enactment of temporary taxes the proceeds of which are earmarked for designated governmental purposes. Increases in our overall tax burden could negatively affect our overall financial performance and profitability.

Our reporting currency is the US dollar but a substantial portion of our revenue and costs and expenses are in the Brazilian real, so that exchange rate movements may affect our financial performance.

We generate revenue, and incur costs and expenses, in our Brazilian operations denominated in Brazilian reais . The results of our Brazilian operations are translated from reais into US dollars upon consolidation when we prepare our consolidated financial statements. When the US dollar weakens relative to the Brazilian real , the contribution of our Brazilian operations to our overall results of operations increases. By contrast, when the US dollar strengthens against the real , the contribution of our Brazilian operations tends to decrease.

The Brazilian currency has historically been subject to significant exchange rate fluctuations in relation to the US dollar and other currencies and has been devalued frequently over the past four decades. These exchange rate movements have been attributable to economic conditions in Brazil, Brazilian governmental policies and actions, developments in global foreign exchange markets and other factors. The  real depreciated by 8.5% against the US dollar in

18

Table of Contents

2012, by 14.3% in 2013 and by 11.4% in 2014 and depreciated further by 29.4% on a year-over-year basis in the thirteen weeks ended March 29, 2015. Our reported consolidated results of operations have periodically been affected by the strength of the US dollar relative to the Brazilian real and further appreciation of the US dollar in the future periods could affect adversely our consolidated results of operations in those periods. Disruptions in financial markets may also result in significant changes in foreign exchange rates in relatively short periods of time which further increases the risk of an adverse currency effect. We do not currently use financial derivatives or hedging agreements to manage our currency exposure. In the future, we may choose to use a combination of natural hedging techniques and financial derivatives to protect against foreign currency exchange rate risks. However, such activities may be ineffective or may not offset more than a portion of the adverse financial effect resulting from foreign currency variations.

Our company’s principal asset is its ownership interest in Fogo de Chão (Holdings) Inc. and if that subsidiary or our other subsidiaries are restricted from distributing or repatriating funds to us, pursuant to law, regulation or otherwise, our liquidity, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We have no material assets other than our ownership of the equity interests in our subsidiaries and no independent means of generating revenue. To the extent that we need funds, and our subsidiaries are restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation, or is otherwise unable to provide such funds, such restrictions or inability could materially adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Brazilian law permits the Brazilian government to impose temporary restrictions on conversions of Brazilian currency into foreign currencies and on remittances to foreign investors of proceeds from their investments in Brazil, whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazil’s balance of payments or there are reasons to expect a pending serious imbalance. Any imposition of restrictions on conversions and remittances could hinder or prevent our Brazilian subsidiaries from converting Brazilian currency into US dollars or other foreign currencies and remitting abroad dividends or distributions. As a result, any imposition of exchange controls restrictions could reduce the market prices of the shares of our common stock.

Additionally, the terms of our Senior Credit Facilities include, and the terms of our New Credit Facility will include, a number of restrictive covenants that impose restrictions on our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things, make certain restricted payments, including dividends to us.

Cash repatriation restrictions and exchange controls may also limit our ability to convert foreign currencies such as the real into US dollars or to remit payments by our Brazilian subsidiaries or businesses located in or conducted within a country imposing restrictions or controls. We may face similar risks in other international jurisdictions in which we operate. While we have repatriated cash historically, in the future we do not intend to repatriate or convert cash held in countries that have significant restrictions or controls in place, but should we need to do so to fund our operations, we may be unable to repatriate or convert such cash, or unable to do so without incurring substantial costs which may have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Our future success depends upon the continued appeal of our restaurant concept and we are vulnerable to changes to consumer preferences.

Our success depends, in considerable part, on the popularity of our menu offerings and the overall dining experience provided to guests by our restaurants. Any shift in consumer preferences away from our restaurant concept could negatively affect our financial performance. The restaurant industry is characterized by the continual introduction of new concepts and is subject to rapidly changing consumer preferences, tastes and dining habits. There can be no assurance that consumers will continue to regard churrascaria -inspired or steakhouse-based food favorably or that we will be able to develop new products that appeal to consumer preferences. Our business, financial condition and results of operations depend in part on our ability to anticipate, identify and respond to changing consumer preferences. Any failure by us to anticipate and respond to changing guest preferences could make our restaurants less appealing and adversely affect our business.

19

Table of Contents

Our historical revenue and AUVs may not be indicative of our future financial performance.

Our revenue and AUVs have historically been, and will continue to be, affected by, among others, the following factors:

Existing restaurants may fail to maintain revenue and AUV levels consistent with our historical experience. New restaurants may not reach the historical revenue and AUV levels of our existing restaurants according to our plans, if at all. Any decrease in our revenue or AUVs would negatively affect our financial performance, which could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate substantially.

Our future growth depends on our ability to open new restaurants in existing and new markets and to operate these restaurants profitably.

Our future financial performance will depend on our ability to execute our business strategy—in particular, to open new restaurants on a profitable basis. We currently operate 26 restaurants in the United States, 10 restaurants in Brazil and one joint venture restaurant in Mexico. We plan to open five to six restaurants during Fiscal 2015, which includes our first joint venture restaurant in Mexico City, which opened in May 2015. Over the next five years, we plan to increase our company-owned restaurant count by at least 10% annually, with North America being our primary market for new restaurant development. In addition, we plan to grow in Brazil as well as other international markets, however there is no guarantee that we will be able to increase the number of our restaurants in North America or in international markets. Our ability to successfully open new restaurants is, in turn, dependent upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

We continuously review potential sites for future restaurants. Typically, we experience a “start-up” period before a new restaurant achieves our targeted level of operating and financial performance which may include an initial start-up period of sales volatility. In addition, we face higher operating costs caused by start-up costs including higher food, labor and other direct operating expenses and other temporary inefficiencies associated with opening new restaurants. We may also face challenges such as lack of brand recognition, market familiarity and acceptance when we enter new markets.

20

Table of Contents

Our long-term success is highly dependent on our ability to successfully identify appropriate sites and develop and expand our operations in existing and new markets.

We intend to develop new restaurants in our existing markets, and selectively enter into new markets. There can be no assurance that any new restaurant that we open will have similar operating results to those of existing restaurants. There is no guarantee that a sufficient number of suitable restaurant sites will be available in desirable areas or on terms that are acceptable to us, and we may not be able to open our planned new restaurants on a timely basis, if at all. Further, if opened, these restaurants may not be operated profitably. As part of our growth strategy, we may enter into geographic markets in which we have little or no prior operating experience. Consumer recognition of our brand has been important in the success of restaurants in our existing markets and recognition may be lacking in new geographic markets. In addition, restaurants we open in new markets may take longer to reach expected sales and profit levels on a consistent basis and may have higher construction, occupancy or operating expenses than restaurants we open in existing markets, thereby affecting our overall profitability. Any failure on our part to recognize or respond to these challenges may adversely affect the success of any new restaurants.

The number and timing of new restaurants opened during any given period, and their associated contribution to operating growth, may be negatively impacted by a number of factors including, without limitation:

If we are unable to successfully open new restaurants, our financial results or revenue growth could be adversely affected and our business negatively affected as we expect a portion of our growth to come from new restaurants.

21

Table of Contents

Our failure to manage our growth effectively could harm our business and operating results.

Our growth plan includes opening a number of new restaurants. Our existing restaurant management systems, administrative staff, financial and management controls and information systems may be inadequate to support our planned expansion. Those demands on our infrastructure and resources may also adversely affect our ability to manage our existing restaurants. Managing our growth effectively will require us to continue to enhance these systems, procedures and controls and to hire, train and retain managers, gaucho chefs and other team members. We may not respond quickly enough to the changing demands that our expansion will impose on our management, restaurant teams and existing infrastructure which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We believe our gaucho culture is an important contributor to our success. As we grow, however, we may have difficulty maintaining our culture or adapting it sufficiently to meet the needs of our operations. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected if we do not maintain our infrastructure and culture as we grow.

We have a history of net losses and may incur losses in the future.

We incurred net losses in Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2013. We may incur net losses in the future and we cannot assure you that we will achieve or sustain profitability.

Increases in the prices of, or reductions in the availability of, top-quality beef could reduce our operating margins and revenue.

We purchase substantial quantities of beef, particularly Angus Beef ^® (and its equivalent in Brazil), which is subject to significant price fluctuations due to conditions affecting livestock markets, weather, feed prices, industry demand and other factors. Our meat costs accounted for approximately 59% of our total food and beverage costs in the United States during 2013, approximately 57% during 2014 and approximately 58% during the thirteen weeks ended March 29, 2015. Because our restaurants in the United States feature Angus Beef ^® , we generally would expect to purchase this type of beef even in the face of significant price increases. If the price for beef increases in the future and we choose not to pass, or cannot pass, these increases on to our guests, our operating margins could decrease significantly. In addition, if key beef items become unavailable for us to purchase, our revenue could decrease.

We may experience higher operating costs, including increases in supplier prices and employee salaries and benefits, which could adversely affect our financial performance.

Our ability to maintain consistent quality throughout our restaurants depends, in part, upon our ability to acquire fresh food products, including Angus Beef ^® (and its equivalent in Brazil), and related items from reliable sources in accordance with our specifications and in sufficient quantities. We have pricing agreements in place with a few suppliers for our beef purchases in the United States and short term contracts with a limited number of suppliers for the distribution of our other food purchases and other supplies for our restaurants. We do not have any supply agreements or pricing agreements in place in Brazil, and therefore we are subject to risks of shortages and price fluctuations with respect to our food purchases for our restaurants in Brazil. Our largest supplier of beef accounted for 70% of our beef purchases in the United States in 2013, 77% in 2014 and 99% in the thirteen weeks ended March 29, 2015. Our dependence on a limited number of suppliers subjects us to risks of shortages, delivery interruptions and price fluctuations. If our suppliers do not perform adequately or otherwise fail to distribute supplies to our restaurants, we may be unable to replace them in a short period of time on acceptable terms. Any inability to so replace suppliers could increase our costs or cause shortages at our restaurants of food and other items that may cause us to remove popular items from a restaurant’s menu or temporarily close a restaurant, which could result in a loss of guests and, consequently, revenue during the time of the shortage and thereafter, if our guests change their dining habits as a result.

If we pay higher prices for food items or other supplies or increase compensation or benefits to our employees, we will sustain an increase in our operating costs. Many factors affect the prices paid for food and other items, including conditions affecting livestock markets, weather, changes in demand and inflation. Factors that may affect compensation and benefits paid to our employees include changes in minimum wage and employee benefits laws (as

22

Table of Contents

discussed below). Other factors that could cause our operating costs to increase include fuel prices, occupancy and related costs, maintenance expenditures and increases in other day-to-day expenses. If we are unable or unwilling to increase our menu prices or take other actions to offset increased operating costs, we could experience a decline in our financial performance.

We rely heavily on certain vendors, suppliers and distributors, which could adversely affect our business.

Our ability to maintain consistent price and quality throughout our restaurants depends in part upon our ability to acquire specified food products and supplies in sufficient quantities from third-party vendors, suppliers and distributors at a reasonable cost. We rely on US Foods, Inc. (“US Foods”) as one of our primary distributors. In Fiscal 2013 and 2014, and the thirteen weeks ended March 29, 2015, we spent approximately 70%,72%, and 72%, respectively, of our food and beverage costs in the United States on products and supplies procured from US Foods. Our agreement with US Foods can be terminated by either us or US Foods upon 60 days’ written notice. We do not control the businesses of our vendors, suppliers and distributors, and our efforts to specify and monitor the standards under which they perform may not be successful. Furthermore, certain food items are perishable, and we have limited control over whether these items will be delivered to us in appropriate condition for use in our restaurants. If any of our vendors, suppliers or distributors are unable to fulfill their obligations to our standards, or if we are unable to find replacement providers in the event of a supply or service disruption, we could encounter supply shortages and incur higher costs to secure adequate supplies, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our marketing programs may not be successful.

We believe our brand is critical to our business. We incur costs and expend other resources in our marketing efforts to raise brand awareness and attract and retain guests. These initiatives may not be successful, resulting in expenses incurred without the benefit of higher revenue. Additionally, some of our competitors have greater financial resources, which enable them to spend significantly more than we are able to on marketing and advertising. Should our competitors increase spending on marketing and advertising or our marketing funds decrease for any reason, or should our advertising and promotions be less effective than our competitors, there could be a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

Any negative publicity surrounding our restaurants or our sector of the industry could adversely affect the number of restaurant guests, which could reduce revenue in our restaurants.

We believe that any adverse publicity concerning the quality of our food and our restaurants generally could damage our brand and adversely affect the future success of our business. Company-specific adverse publicity, including inaccurate publicity, could take different forms, such as negative reviews by restaurant or word-of-mouth criticisms emanating from our guest base. Also, there has been a recent increase in the use of social media platforms and similar devices, including weblogs (blogs), social media websites, and other forms of Internet-based communications which allow individuals access to a broad audience of consumers and other interested persons. Many social media platforms immediately publish the content their subscribers and participants can post, often without filters or checks on accuracy of the content posted. There is significant opportunity for dissemination of information, including inaccurate information. Information concerning our company may be posted on such platforms at any time. Information posted may be adverse to our interests or may be inaccurate, either of which may harm our business and financial performance. The harm may be immediate without affording us an opportunity for redress or correction.

Negative publicity relating to the consumption of beef, including in connection with food-borne illness, could result in reduced consumer demand for our menu offerings, which could reduce sales.

Instances of food-borne illness, including Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, which is also known as BSE, and aphthous fever, as well as hepatitis A, lysteria, salmonella and e-coli, whether or not found in the United States or Brazil or traced directly to one of our suppliers or our restaurants, could reduce demand for our menu offerings. We cannot guarantee that our internal controls and training will be fully effective in preventing all food safety issues at our restaurants, including instances of food-borne illnesses. Any negative publicity relating to these and other health-related matters may affect consumers’ perceptions of our restaurants and the food that we offer, reduce guest visits to our restaurants and negatively impact demand for our menu offerings. Adverse publicity relating to any of these matters, beef in general or other similar concerns could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

23

Table of Contents

Our company could face lawsuits relating to workplace and employment laws and fair credit reporting requirements, which, if determined adversely, could result in negative publicity or in payment of substantial damages by us.

Various federal and state labor laws govern our relationships with our employees and affect operating costs. These laws include employee classifications as exempt or non-exempt, minimum wage requirements, unemployment tax rates, workers’ compensation rates, citizenship requirements and other wage and benefit requirements for employees classified as non-exempt. Our business may be adversely affected by legal or governmental proceedings brought by or on behalf of our employees or guests. Although we require all workers to provide us with government-specified documentation evidencing their employment eligibility, some of our employees may, without our knowledge, be unauthorized workers. We currently participate in the “E-Verify” program, an Internet-based, free program run by the United States government to verify employment eligibility, in states in which participation is required. However, use of the “E-Verify” program does not guarantee that we will properly identify all applicants who are ineligible for employment. Unauthorized workers are subject to deportation and may subject us to fines or penalties, and if any of our workers are found to be unauthorized we could experience adverse publicity that negatively impacts our brand and may make it more difficult to hire and keep qualified employees. Termination of a significant number of employees who were unauthorized employees may disrupt our operations, cause temporary increases in our labor costs as we train new employees and result in additional adverse publicity. We could also become subject to fines, penalties and other costs related to claims that we did not fully comply with all record-keeping obligations of federal and state immigration compliance laws. These factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

In recent years, a number of restaurant companies, including our company, have been subject to lawsuits and other claims, including class action lawsuits, alleging violations of federal and state law governing workplace and employment matters such as various forms of discrimination, wrongful termination, harassment and similar matters and violations of fair credit reporting requirements. A number of these lawsuits and claims against other companies have resulted in various penalties, including the payment of substantial damages by the defendants. In addition, lawsuits by employees are common in Brazil after termination of employment and we have been subject to a number of these lawsuits. Insurance may not be available at all or in sufficient amounts to cover all liabilities with respect to these matters. Accordingly, we may incur substantial damages and expenses resulting from claims and lawsuits, which would increase our operating costs, decrease funds available for the development of our business and result in charges to our income statements resulting in decreased profitability or net losses. Employee claims against us also create not only legal and financial liability but negative publicity that could adversely affect us and divert our financial and management resources that would otherwise be used to benefit the future performance of our operations.

Litigation concerning food quality, health, employee conduct and other issues could require us to incur additional liabilities or cause guests to avoid our restaurants.

Restaurant companies have from time to time faced lawsuits alleging that a guest suffered illness or injury during or after a visit to a restaurant, including actions seeking damages resulting from food borne illness and relating to notices with respect to chemicals contained in food products required under state law. Similarly, food tampering, employee hygiene and cleanliness failures or improper employee conduct at our restaurants could lead to product liability or other claims. To date, we have not been a defendant in any lawsuit asserting such a claim. However, we cannot assure you that such a lawsuit will not be filed against us and we cannot guarantee to consumers that our internal controls and training will be fully effective in preventing claims. We are also subject to various claims arising in the ordinary course of our business, including personal injury claims, contract claims and other matters. In addition, we could become subject to class action lawsuits related to these and other matters in the future. Regardless of whether any claims against us are valid or whether we are ultimately held liable, claims may be expensive to defend and may divert management attention and other resources from our operations and hurt our financial performance. A judgment significantly in excess of our insurance coverage for any claims would materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, adverse publicity resulting from any such claims may negatively impact revenue at one or more of our restaurants.

24

Table of Contents

Our business is subject to extensive regulation and we may incur additional costs or liabilities as a result of government regulation of our restaurants.

Our business is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign government regulation, including, among others, regulations related to the preparation and sale of food, the sale of alcoholic beverages, zoning and building codes, land use and employee, health, sanitation and safety matters.

Typically, our licenses to sell alcoholic beverages must be renewed annually and may be suspended or revoked at any time for cause. Alcoholic beverage control regulations govern various aspects of daily operations of our restaurants, including the minimum age of guests and employees, hours of operation, advertising, wholesale purchasing and inventory control, handling and storage. Any failure by any of our restaurants to obtain and maintain, on a timely basis, liquor or other licenses, permits or approvals required to serve alcoholic beverages or food, as well as any associated negative publicity, could delay or prevent the opening of, or adversely impact the viability of, and could have an adverse effect on, that restaurant and its operating and financial performance. We apply for our liquor licenses with the advice of outside legal counsel and licensing consultants. Because of the many and various state and federal licensing and permitting requirements, there is a significant risk that one or more regulatory agencies could determine that we have not complied with applicable licensing or permitting regulations or have not maintained the approvals necessary for us to conduct business within its jurisdiction. Any changes in the application or interpretation of existing laws may adversely impact our restaurants in that state, and could also cause us to lose, either temporarily or permanently, the licenses, permits and regulations necessary to conduct our restaurant operations, and subject us to fines and penalties.

There is also a potential for increased regulation of certain food establishments in the United States, where compliance with a Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (“HACCP”) approach would be required. HACCP refers to a management system in which food safety is addressed through the analysis and control of potential hazards from production, procurement and handling, to manufacturing, distribution and consumption of the finished product. Many states have required restaurants to develop and implement HACCP Systems, and the United States government continues to expand the sectors of the food industry that must adopt and implement HACCP programs. For example, the Food Safety Modernization Act (the “FSMA”), signed into law in January 2011, granted the FDA new authority regarding the safety of the entire food system, including through increased inspections and mandatory food recalls. Although restaurants are specifically exempted from or not directly implicated by some of these new requirements, we anticipate that the new requirements may impact our industry. Additionally, our suppliers may initiate or otherwise be subject to food recalls that may impact the availability of certain products, result in adverse publicity or require us to take actions that could be costly for us or otherwise impact our business.

Our restaurants in the United States are subject to state “dram shop” laws, which generally allow a person to sue us if that person was injured by an intoxicated person who was wrongfully served alcoholic beverages at one of our restaurants. Recent litigation against restaurant chains has resulted in significant judgments, including punitive damages, under dram shop laws. A judgment against us under a dram shop law could exceed our liability insurance coverage policy limits and could result in substantial liability for us and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. Our inability to continue to obtain such insurance coverage at reasonable cost also could have a material adverse effect on us. Regardless of whether any claims against us are valid or whether we are liable, we may be adversely affected by publicity resulting from such laws.

The costs of operating our restaurants may increase in the event of changes in laws governing minimum hourly wages, working conditions, overtime and tip credits, health care, workers’ compensation insurance rates, unemployment tax rates, sales taxes or other laws and regulations, such as those governing access for the disabled (including the Americans with Disabilities Act). If any of these costs were to increase and we were unable or unwilling to pass on such costs to our guests by increasing menu prices or by other means, our business and results of operations could be negatively affected.

Failure to comply with federal, state or local regulations could cause our licenses to be revoked and force us to cease the sale of alcoholic beverages at certain restaurants. Any difficulties, delays or failures in obtaining such licenses, permits or approvals could delay or prevent the opening of a restaurant in a particular area or increase the costs associated

25

Table of Contents

therewith. In addition, in certain states, including states where we have existing restaurants or where we plan to open a restaurant, the number of liquor licenses available is limited, and licenses are traded on the open market. Liquor, beer and wine sales comprise a significant portion of our revenue. If we are unable to maintain our existing licenses, our guest patronage, revenue and results of operations would be adversely affected. Or, if we choose to open a restaurant in those states where the number of licenses available is limited, the cost of a new license could be significant.

Any failure to protect and maintain our intellectual property rights could adversely affect the value of our brand.

We have registered our principal trademarks including the FOGO, FOGO DE CHÃO and BAR FOGO marks, the campfire design and other marks used by our restaurants as trade names, trademarks or service marks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, in Brazil and in numerous foreign countries. The trademarks we currently use have not been registered in all of the countries outside of the United States in which we do business or may do business in the future. We may never register such trademarks in all of these countries and, even if we do, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States. We believe that our intellectual property are valuable assets that are critical to our success. The success of our business depends on our continued ability to use our intellectual property in order to increase our brand awareness, and the unauthorized use or other misappropriation of our intellectual property in the United States or any foreign countries could diminish the value of our brands and restaurant concept and may cause a decline in our revenue. We are also aware of names similar to those of our restaurants used by third parties in certain limited geographical areas in the United States, Brazil and elsewhere. Protective actions taken by us with respect to these rights may fail to prevent unauthorized usage or imitation by others, which could harm our reputation, brands or competitive position and, if we commence litigation to enforce our rights, cause us to incur significant legal expenses.

In January 2015, the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office published a request by Churrasciaria Vento Norte Ltda. (doing business as Vento Haragano) to partially nullify our trademark registration in Brazil for Fogo de Chão on the grounds that it violates the Brazilian Industrial Property Act for being descriptive. Vento Haragano has requested that the Brazilian Patent and Trademark Office declare that we not have exclusive rights to use the trademark Fogo de Chão at our locations in Brazil. If we lose the exclusive rights to use the trademark Fogo de Chão in Brazil, we could suffer damage or diminution of value to our brand. In addition, third parties may claim infringement by us in the future. Any such claim, whether or not it has merit, could be time consuming, result in costly legal expenses, cause delays in the launch of new products, or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, all of which could harm our business and results of operations.

The impact of negative economic factors, including the availability of credit, on our landlords and other retail center tenants could negatively affect our financial results.

Negative effects on our existing and potential landlords due to any inaccessibility of credit and other unfavorable economic factors may, in turn, adversely affect our business and results of operations. If our landlords are unable to obtain financing or remain in good standing under their existing financing arrangements, they may be unable to provide construction contributions or satisfy other lease covenants to us. If any landlord files for bankruptcy protection, the landlord may be able to reject our lease in the bankruptcy proceedings. While we would have the option to retain our rights under the lease, we could not compel the landlord to perform any of its obligations and would be left with damages as our sole recourse. In addition, if our landlords are unable to obtain sufficient credit to continue to properly manage their retail sites, we may experience a drop in the level of quality of such retail centers. Our development of new restaurants may also be adversely affected by the negative financial situations of developers and potential landlords.

We occupy most of our restaurants under long-term non-cancelable leases, which we may be unable to renew at the end of the lease terms or which may limit our flexibility to move to new locations.

All but two of our restaurants in the United States are located in leased premises and all of our restaurants in Brazil are located in leased premises. Many of our current leases in the United States are non-cancelable and usually have terms ranging from 10 to 20 years, with renewal options for terms ranging from five to 10 years. We anticipate that leases that we enter into in the future in the United States will also be long-term and non-cancelable and have similar renewal options. If we were to close or fail to open a restaurant at a leased location, we would generally remain

26

Table of Contents

committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease, which could include, among other things, payment of the base rent for the balance of the lease term. Our obligation to continue making rental payments and fulfilling other lease obligations under leases for closed or unopened restaurants could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, lease rates in Brazil are typically readjusted every three years and the rent amounts are not predetermined as they are in the United States. If the landlord and we cannot agree on an adjusted rate, the dispute is submitted to a judicial resolution process. As a result, our lease rates in Brazil are subject to more volatility than those in the United States and we may not always be able to predict these rates due to the unpredictable nature of the judicial resolution process, which could be unfavorable to us.

At the end of the lease term and any renewal period for a restaurant, we may be unable to renew the lease without substantial additional cost, if at all. If we are unable to renew our restaurant leases, we may be forced to close or relocate a restaurant, which could subject us to significant construction and other costs. For example, closing a restaurant, even for a brief period to permit relocation, would reduce the revenue contribution of that restaurant to our total revenue. Additionally, the revenue and profit, if any, generated at a relocated restaurant may not equal the revenue and profit generated at the previous restaurant location.

Long-term leases can, however, limit our flexibility to move a restaurant to a new location. For example, current locations may no longer be attractive in the event that demographic patterns shift or neighborhood conditions decline. In addition, long-term leases may affect our ability to take advantage of more favorable rent levels due to changes in local real estate market conditions. These and other location-related issues may affect the financial performance of individual restaurants.

Our rent expense could increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions and could limit our operating and financial flexibility.

Our rent expense accounted for approximately 7.1% of our revenue in 2013, 6.4% in 2014 and 6.8% in the thirteen weeks ended March 29, 2015. We expect that new restaurants will typically be leased by us under operating leases. Substantial operating lease obligations could have significant negative consequences, including:

We depend on cash flow from operations to pay our lease obligations and to fulfill our other cash requirements. If our restaurants do not generate sufficient cash flow and sufficient funds are not otherwise available to us from borrowings under bank loans or from other sources, we may not be able to meet our lease obligations, grow our business, respond to competitive challenges or fund our other liquidity and capital needs, which would have a material adverse effect on us.

Opening new restaurants in existing markets may negatively affect sales at our existing restaurants.

The consumer target area of our restaurants varies by location, depending on a number of factors, including population density, other local retail and business attractions, area demographics and geography. As a result, the opening of a new restaurant in or near markets in which we already have restaurants could adversely affect sales at these existing restaurants. Existing restaurants could also make it more difficult to build our consumer base for a new restaurant in the same market. Our core business strategy does not entail opening new restaurants that we believe will materially affect sales at our existing restaurants, but we may selectively open new restaurants in and around areas of existing restaurants that are operating at or near capacity to effectively serve our guests. Sales cannibalization between our restaurants may become significant in the future as we continue to expand our operations and could affect our sales growth, which could, in turn, materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

27

Table of Contents

Labor shortages or increases in labor costs could slow our growth and adversely affect our ability to operate our restaurants.

Our success depends, in part, upon our ability to attract, motivate and retain qualified employees, including restaurant managers and gaucho chefs necessary to meet the needs of our existing restaurants and to support our expansion program. Qualified personnel to fill these positions may be in short supply in some areas. If we are unable to continue to recruit and retain sufficiently qualified personnel, our business and our growth could be adversely affected. Any future inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel may delay openings of new restaurants and could adversely impact existing restaurants. Any such delays, any material increases in employee turnover rates in existing restaurants or any employee dissatisfaction could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In addition, competition for qualified employees could require us to pay higher wages, which could result in higher labor costs, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

Increases in minimum wages or unionization activities could substantially increase our labor costs.

Under the minimum wage laws in most jurisdictions in the United States, we are permitted to pay certain hourly employees a wage that is less than the base minimum wage for general employees because these employees receive tips as a substantial part of their income. As of March 29, 2015, approximately 33.7% of our employees in the United States earn this lower minimum wage in their respective locations as tips constitute a substantial part of their income. If federal, state or local governments change their laws to require that all employees be paid the general employee minimum base wage regardless of supplemental tip income, our labor costs would increase substantially. Our labor costs would also increase if the minimum base wage increases. We may be unable or unwilling to increase our prices in order to pass increased labor costs on to our guests, in which case our operating margins would be adversely affected. Also, although none of our employees in the United States are currently covered under collective bargaining agreements, our employees in Brazil participate in industry-wide trade union programs. Additionally, our employees in the United States may elect or attempt to be represented by labor unions in the future. If a significant number of our employees were to become unionized and collective bargaining agreement terms were significantly different from our current compensation arrangements, it could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our growth may be hindered by immigration restrictions, our inability to obtain necessary visas and work permits for foreign workers and changes in United States immigration laws and regulations, particularly with respect to L-1B visa eligibility.

Our future success could depend on our ability to attract and retain employees with specialized culinary skills. Many of our gaucho chefs in the United States are Brazilian nationals whose ability to work in the United States depends on obtaining and maintaining necessary visas and work permits (which may or may not be tied to their employment with us).

Immigration and work permit laws and regulations in the United States are subject to changes, both in substance as well as in the application of standards and enforcement. Immigration and work permit laws and regulations can be significantly affected by political considerations and economic conditions in the United States. We have been, and may in the future be, unable to obtain visas or work permits to bring necessary employees to the United States for any number of reasons including, among others, limits set by the US Department of Homeland Security or the US Department of State. The Department of Homeland Security’s Bureau of Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS, formerly INS) began to narrow its interpretation of L-1B visa eligibility as to all corporate petitioners in 2007 and 2008. Beginning in 2009, the USCIS ceased approving our L-1B visas and recommended that the petitions of 10 current L-1B visa holders be revoked. We contested the adverse actions before USCIS, and then sued USCIS in US District Court. The US District Court affirmed the USCIS denials in 2013, but we appealed that determination, and on October 21, 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit granted our appeal, rejected the USCIS denial, and remanded the representative L-1B petition in question to the district court, with instructions to vacate the denial and to remand to USCIS for further consideration in light of the Court’s correction of USCIS’s factual and legal adjudication errors. We anticipate that USCIS may reopen the representative L-1B petition following remand to the district court.

Due to the current climate and uncertainty relative to the process of requesting and obtaining L-1B visas, as well as recent denials of certain requests, we will continue to explore all available legal means to bring employees from Brazil to work in our restaurants in the United States. Continued compliance with existing US or foreign immigration

28

Table of Contents

laws or changes in such laws, making it more difficult to hire foreign nationals or limiting our ability to retain visas or work permits for current employees in the United States, could materially adversely affect our expansion strategy and, more generally, our business and financial performance.

The effect of changes to healthcare laws in the United States may increase the number of employees who choose to participate in our healthcare plans, which may significantly increase our healthcare costs and negatively impact our financial results.

In 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) was signed into law in the United States to require health care coverage for many uninsured individuals and expand coverage to those already insured. We currently offer and subsidize a portion of comprehensive healthcare coverage, primarily for our salaried employees. The healthcare reform law will require us to offer healthcare benefits to all full-time employees (including full-time hourly employees) that meet certain minimum requirements of coverage and affordability, or face penalties. If we elect to offer such benefits we may incur substantial expense. If we fail to offer such benefits, or the benefits we elect to offer do not meet the applicable requirements, we may incur penalties. The healthcare reform law also requires individuals to obtain coverage or face individual penalties, so employees who are currently eligible but elect not to participate in our healthcare plans may find it more advantageous to do so when such individual mandates take effect. It is also possible that by making changes or failing to make changes in the healthcare plans offered by us we will become less competitive in the market for our labor. Finally, implementing the requirements of healthcare reform is likely to impose additional administrative costs. The costs and other effects of these new healthcare requirements cannot be determined with certainty, but they may significantly increase our healthcare coverage costs and could materially adversely affect our, business, financial condition and results of operations.

Legislation and regulations requiring the display and provision of nutritional information for our menu offerings, and new information or attitudes regarding diet and health or adverse opinions about the health effects of consuming our menu offerings, could affect consumer preferences and negatively impact our results of operations.

Government regulation and consumer eating habits may impact our business as a result of changes in attitudes regarding diet and health or new information regarding the health effects of consuming our menu offerings. These changes have resulted in, and may continue to result in, the enactment of laws and regulations that impact the ingredients and nutritional content of our menu offerings, or laws and regulations requiring us to disclose the nutritional content of our food offerings.

The PPACA establishes a uniform, federal requirement for certain restaurants to post certain nutritional information on their menus. Specifically, the PPACA amended the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to require chain restaurants with 20 or more locations operating under the same name and offering substantially the same menus to publish the total number of calories of standard menu items on menus and menu boards, along with a statement that puts this calorie information in the context of a total daily calorie intake. The PPACA also requires covered restaurants to provide to consumers, upon request, a written summary of detailed nutritional information for each standard menu item, and to provide a statement on menus and menu boards about the availability of this information. The PPACA further permits the United States Food and Drug Administration to require covered restaurants to make additional nutrient disclosures, such as disclosure of trans-fat content. An unfavorable report on, or reaction to, our menu ingredients, the size of our portions or the nutritional content of our menu items could negatively influence the demand for our offerings.

Furthermore, a number of states, counties and cities have enacted menu labeling laws requiring multi-unit restaurant operators to disclose certain nutritional information to guests, or have enacted legislation restricting the use of certain types of ingredients in restaurants. California is one of these, although its menu labeling law has been superseded by the PPACA.

Compliance with current and future laws and regulations regarding the ingredients and nutritional content of our menu items may be costly and time-consuming. Additionally, some government authorities are increasing regulations regarding trans-fats and sodium, which may require us to limit or eliminate trans-fats and sodium in our offerings, switch to higher cost ingredients or may hinder our ability to operate in certain markets. Some jurisdictions have banned certain cooking ingredients, such as trans-fats, or have discussed banning certain products, such as large sodas.

29

Table of Contents

Removal of these products and ingredients from our menus could affect product tastes, guest satisfaction levels, and sales volumes, whereas if we fail to comply with these laws or regulations, our business could experience a material adverse effect.

We cannot make any assurances regarding our ability to effectively respond to changes in consumer health perceptions or our ability to successfully implement the nutrient content disclosure requirements and to adapt our menu offerings to trends in eating habits. The imposition of additional menu-labeling laws could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position, as well as on the restaurant industry in general.

A breach of security of confidential consumer information related to our electronic processing of credit and debit card transactions could substantially affect our reputation and financial results.

A significant majority of our sales are by credit or debit cards. Other restaurants and retailers have experienced security breaches in which credit and debit card information has been stolen. We may in the future become subject to claims for purportedly fraudulent transactions arising out of the actual or alleged theft of credit or debit card information, and we may also be subject to lawsuits or other proceedings relating to these types of incidents. In addition, most states have enacted legislation requiring notification of security breaches involving personal information, including credit and debit card information. Any such claim or proceeding could cause us to incur significant unplanned expenses, which could have an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. Further, adverse publicity resulting from these allegations may have a material adverse effect on us and our restaurants.

We rely heavily on information technology, and any material failure, weakness, interruption or breach of security could prevent us from effectively operating our business.

We rely heavily on information systems, including point-of-sale processing in our restaurants, for management of our supply chain, payment of obligations, collection of cash, credit and debit card transactions and other processes and procedures. Our ability to efficiently and effectively manage our business depends significantly on the reliability and capacity of these systems. Our operations depend upon our ability to protect our computer equipment and systems against damage from physical theft, fire, power loss, telecommunications failure or other catastrophic events, as well as from internal and external security breaches, viruses and other disruptive problems. The failure of these systems to operate effectively, maintenance problems, upgrading or transitioning to new platforms, expanding our systems as we grow or a breach in security of these systems could result in delays in guest service and reduce efficiency in our operations. Remediation of such problems could result in significant, unplanned capital investments.

The historical financial information, including the combined historical financial information for the 2012 fiscal year, in this prospectus may not accurately predict our results or our costs of operations in the future.

The historical financial information in this prospectus does not reflect the added costs we expect to incur as a public company or the resulting changes that will occur in our capital structure and operations. The estimates used in our as adjusted financial information may not be similar to our actual experience as a public company. For purposes of presenting a comparison of our Fiscal 2012 results to the fiscal years ended December 29, 2013 and December 28, 2014, we have presented our Fiscal 2012 results as the mathematical addition of the respective Predecessor and Successor periods. We believe that this presentation provides meaningful information about our results of operations. This approach is not consistent with US GAAP, may yield results that are not strictly comparable on a period-to-period basis and may not reflect the actual results we would have achieved. Accordingly, the historical financial information in this prospectus may not be indicative of our future financial performance.

Changes to estimates related to our property, fixtures and equipment or operating results that are lower than our current estimates at certain restaurant locations may cause us to incur impairment charges on certain long-lived assets, which may adversely affect our results of operations.

In accordance with accounting guidance as it relates to the impairment of long-lived assets, we make certain estimates and projections with regard to individual restaurant operations, as well as our overall performance, in connection with our impairment analyses for long-lived assets. When impairment triggers are deemed to exist for any

30

Table of Contents

location, the estimated undiscounted future cash flows are compared to its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, an impairment charge equal to the difference between the carrying value and the fair value is recorded. The projections of future cash flows used in these analyses require the use of judgment and a number of estimates and projections of future operating results. If actual results differ from our estimates, additional charges for asset impairments may be required in the future. If future impairment charges are significant, our reported operating results would be adversely affected.

Changes to accounting rules or regulations may adversely affect our results of operations.

Changes to existing accounting rules or regulations may impact our future results of operations or cause the perception that we are more highly leveraged. Other new accounting rules or regulations and varying interpretations of existing accounting rules or regulations have occurred and may occur in the future. For example, accounting regulatory authorities have indicated that they may begin to require lessees to capitalize operating leases in their financial statements in the next few years. If adopted, such change would require us to record significant capital lease obligations on our balance sheet and make other changes to our financial statements. This and other future changes to accounting rules or regulations could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Loss of key management personnel could hurt our business and inhibit our ability to operate and grow successfully.

Our success will continue to depend, to a significant extent, on our leadership team and other key management personnel. If we are unable to attract and retain sufficiently experienced and capable management personnel, our business and financial results may suffer. If members of our leadership team or other key management personnel leave, we may have difficulty replacing them, and our business may suffer. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully attract and retain our leadership team and other key management personnel that we need. We also do not maintain any key man life insurance policies for any of our employees.

Our current insurance policies may not provide adequate levels of coverage against all claims, and we may incur losses that are not covered by our insurance.

We maintain insurance coverage for a significant portion of our risks and associated liabilities with respect to general liability, property and casualty liability, liquor liability, employer’s liability and other insurable risks. However, there are types of losses we may incur that cannot be insured against or that we believe are not commercially reasonable to insure. For example, insurance covering liability for violations of wage and hour laws has not generally been available. We also self-insure for workers’ compensation and health benefits under plans with high deductibles. Losses for such uninsured claims, if they occur, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Compliance with environmental laws may negatively affect our business.

We are subject to national, provincial, state and local laws and regulations in the United States, Brazil and Mexico concerning waste disposal, pollution, protection of the environment, and the presence, discharge, storage, handling, release and disposal of, and exposure to, hazardous or toxic substances. These environmental laws provide for significant fines and penalties for noncompliance and liabilities for remediation, sometimes without regard to whether the owner or operator of the property knew of, or was responsible for, the release or presence of hazardous toxic substances. Third parties may also make claims against owners or operators of properties for personal injuries and property damage associated with releases of, or actual or alleged exposure to, such hazardous or toxic substances at, on or from our restaurants. Environmental conditions relating to releases of hazardous substances at prior, existing or future restaurant sites could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, environmental laws, and the administration, interpretation and enforcement thereof, are subject to change and may become more stringent in the future, each of which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.

As of December 28, 2014, we had federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $31.5 million and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $22.9 million. Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal

31

Table of Contents

Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” its ability to use its prechange net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset its post-change income may be limited. In general, an “ownership change” generally occurs if there is a cumulative change in our ownership by “5-percent shareholders” that exceeds 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. We have experienced an ownership change in the past and may experience ownership changes in the future as a result of this issuance or future transactions in our stock, some of which may be outside our control. As a result, if we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change net operating loss carryforwards, or other prechange tax attributes, to offset US federal and state taxable income may be subject to significant limitations. As of December 28, 2014, none of the operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitation.

The amount of money that we have borrowed and may, in the future borrow, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating activities.

As of March 29, 2015, we had total aggregate principal amount of outstanding debt of approximately $247.9 million (which is reduced by outstanding letters of credit). In addition, as of March 29, 2015, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the consummation of our initial public offering, the consummation of the refinancing of our existing Senior Credit Facilities and entry into, and effectiveness of, our New Credit Facility and our use of proceeds therefrom as set forth under “Use of Proceeds” we would have had $188.9 million of outstanding debt and $59.4 million available to be borrowed under our New Credit Facility (which is reduced by outstanding letters of credit). Our Senior Credit Facilities, our New Credit Facility and any other debt incurred in the future, may have important consequences to holders of our common stock, including the following:

We expect that we will depend primarily upon cash flow from operations to pay interest and other amounts due under our New Credit Facility and any other indebtedness we may incur in the future. Our ability to make these payments depends on our future performance, which will be affected by business, financial, economic and other factors, many of which we cannot control. If we do not have sufficient funds, we may be required to refinance all or part of our then existing debt, sell assets or borrow more money. We may not be able to accomplish any of these alternatives on terms acceptable to us, if at all. In addition, the terms of existing or future debt agreements, including our Senior Credit Facilities and our New Credit Facility, may restrict us from adopting any of these alternatives.

Our Senior Credit Facilities impose, and our New Credit Facility will impose, operating and financial restrictions that may impair our ability to respond to changing business and industry conditions.

Our Senior Credit Facilities contain, and our New Credit Facility will contain, restrictions and covenants that generally limit our ability to, among other things:

32

Table of Contents

Our Senior Credit Facilities limit, and our New Credit Facility will limit, our ability to engage in these types of transactions even if we believed that a specific transaction would contribute to our future growth or improve our results of operations. Our Senior Credit Facilities require us to meet specified financial and operating results and maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. We are required to maintain two financial covenants, which include a Total Rent Adjusted Leverage Ratio and a Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio (each as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities). These required ratios vary by quarter until maturity. Under the First Lien Credit Facility, we are required to maintain a maximum Total Rent Adjusted Leverage Ratio of 6.50 to 1 and a minimum Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.05 to 1 for the first quarter of 2015 (7.00 to 1 and 1.55 to 1, respectively, under the Second Lien Credit Facility). As of March 29, 2015, our Total Rent Adjusted Leverage Ratio was 4.35 to 1 and our Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio was 4.15 to 1 (each as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities). Under our New Credit Facility, we will be required to maintain a maximum Total Rent Adjusted Leverage Ratio (as defined under our New Credit Facility), at levels that may vary by quarter until maturity, and a minimum Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined under our New Credit Facility), which, beginning with the third quarter ending September 27, 2015, will be 5.50 to 1 and 2.00 to 1, respectively. In addition, as of March 29, 2015, on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the consummation of our initial public offering, the consummation of the refinancing of our existing Senior Credit Facilities and entry into, and effectiveness of, our New Credit Facility and our use of proceeds therefrom as set forth under “Use of Proceeds,” our Total Rent Adjusted Leverage Ratio would have been 3.69 to 1 and our Interest Coverage Ratio would have been 13.38 to 1 (each as defined in the Senior Credit Facilities). As of the date hereof, we were in compliance with our Senior Credit Facilities’ financial covenants. However, breach of these provisions or failure to comply with these financial ratios could result in a default under the Senior Credit Facilities or our New Credit Facility, in which case our lenders would have the right to declare borrowings to be immediately due and payable. Our lenders may also accelerate payment of borrowings upon the occurrence of certain change of control events relating to us. If we are unable to repay borrowings when due, whether at maturity or following a default or change of control event, our lenders would have the right to take or sell assets pledged as collateral to secure the indebtedness. Any such actions taken by our lenders or other creditors would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Risks Related to this Offering and Ownership of Our Common Stock

Following this offering, the THL Funds will continue to have a substantial ownership interest in our common stock. Conflicts of interest may arise because some of our directors are principals of the THL Funds.

After the consummation of this offering, the THL Funds will collectively beneficially own approximately 82% of our outstanding common stock, and approximately 80% of our outstanding common stock if the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares is exercised in full. See “Principal Stockholders.” As a consequence, the THL Funds will be able to control matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors, a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and any other significant transaction. The interests of the THL Funds may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of our other stockholders.

The THL Funds could invest in entities that directly or indirectly compete with us. As a result of these relationships, when conflicts arise between the interests of the THL Funds and the interests of our stockholders, these directors may not be disinterested. The representatives of the THL Funds on our Board of Directors, by the terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and a stockholders’ agreement that will be entered into in connection with this offering, are not required to offer us any transaction opportunity of which they become aware and could take any such opportunity for themselves or offer it to other companies in which they have an investment, unless such opportunity is expressly offered to them solely in their capacity as our directors.

33

Table of Contents

The THL Funds will own a substantial portion of our capital stock after this offering and may have conflicts of interest with other stockholders in the future.

The THL Funds will collectively beneficially own approximately 82% (or 80% if the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares is exercised in full) of our outstanding common stock following the completion of this offering. As a result, the THL Funds could exert significant influence over, and could control, matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of major corporate transactions. In addition, this concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change of control of our company and make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of the THL Funds.

The interests of the THL Funds may not always be consistent with the interests of our company or of other stockholders. Accordingly, the THL Funds could cause us to enter into transactions or agreements of which holders of our common stock would not approve or make decisions with which such holders would disagree.

The THL Funds are in the business of making investments in companies and could from time to time acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete with us. The THL Funds may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and as a result, desirable acquisitions may not be available to us.

An active market for our common stock may not develop, which could make it difficult for you to sell your shares at or above the initial public offering price.

Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for shares of our capital stock. We have applied to list our common stock on the NASDAQ under the symbol “FOGO.” However, we cannot assure you that an active public trading market for our common stock will develop on that exchange or elsewhere or, if developed, that any market will be active or sustained. Accordingly, we cannot assure you as to the liquidity of any such market, your ability to sell your shares of common stock or the prices that you may obtain upon sale of your shares. As a result, you could lose all or part of your investment in our common shares.

We will be a “controlled company” within the meaning of NASDAQ rules and, as a result, will be exempt from certain corporate governance requirements.

Upon completion of this offering, the THL Funds will continue to hold capital stock representing a majority of our outstanding voting power. So long as the THL Funds maintain holdings of more than 50% of the voting power of our capital stock, we will be a “controlled company” within the meaning of NASDAQ corporate governance standards. Under these standards, a company need not comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including:

If we are eligible to do so following this offering, we intend to utilize these exemptions. As a result, we would not have a majority of independent directors on our board of directors and our compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee would not consist entirely of independent directors and will not be subject to annual performance evaluations. If we are no longer eligible to rely on the controlled company exception, we will comply with all applicable NASDAQ corporate governance requirements, but we will be able to rely on phase-in periods for certain of these requirements in accordance with NASDAQ rules. Accordingly, our stockholders may not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all NASDAQ corporate governance requirements.

34

Table of Contents

The market price of our common stock may decline, and you could lose all or a significant part of your investment.

The initial public offering price for our common stock was determined by negotiations between us and the underwriters and does not purport to be indicative of market prices after this offering. The market price of, and trading volume for, our common stock may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including, among others, the following:

As a result of these and other factors, investors in our common stock may experience a decrease, which could be substantial, in the value of their investment, including decreases unrelated to our financial performance or prospects.

The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile, which could result in rapid and substantial losses for our stockholders and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Even if an active trading market develops, the market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares at or above your purchase price, if at all. The market price of our common stock may fluctuate or decline significantly in the future and you could lose all or part of your investment.

35

Table of Contents

Certain broad market and industry factors may materially decrease the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. The stock market in general has from time to time experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations, including recently. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and decreases in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

Future sales of our common stock could cause the market price of such shares to fall.

If our existing stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock following this offering, the market price of our common stock could decrease significantly. The perception in the public market that major stockholders might sell substantial amounts of our common stock could also depress the market price of our common stock.

Immediately after completion of this offering, we will have 27,253,018 shares of common stock outstanding, including shares that will be beneficially owned by the THL Funds. In general, the common stock sold in this offering will be freely transferable without restriction or additional registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act. In addition, under lock-up agreements entered into by us, our officers, directors and holders of all or substantially all our outstanding common stock in connection with this offering, the remaining shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after this offering will become eligible for sale in the public markets from time to time, subject to Securities Act restrictions, following expiration of an 180-day lock-up period.

Jefferies LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC may, in their sole discretion and at any time or from time to time, without notice, release all or any portion of the shares of common stock subject to the lock-up agreements for sale in the public and private markets prior to expiration of the 180-day lock-up period. The market price for our common stock may drop significantly when the restrictions on resale by our existing stockholders lapse or if those restrictions on resale are waived. A decline in the market price of our common stock might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or other equity securities.

Future offerings of equity by us may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

In the future, we may attempt to obtain financing or to further increase our capital resources by issuing additional shares of our common stock or by offering debt or other equity securities, including senior or subordinated notes, debt securities convertible into equity or shares of preferred stock. Opening new restaurants in existing and new markets could require substantial additional capital in excess of cash from operations. We would expect to finance the capital required for new restaurants through a combination of additional issuances of equity, corporate indebtedness and cash from operations.

Issuing additional shares of our common stock or other equity securities or securities convertible into equity may dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our common stock or both. Upon liquidation, holders of such debt securities and preferred shares, if issued, and lenders with respect to other borrowings would receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Debt securities convertible into equity could be subject to adjustments in the conversion ratio pursuant to which certain events may increase the number of equity securities issuable upon conversion. Preferred shares, if issued, could have a preference with respect to liquidating distributions or a preference with respect to dividend payments that could limit our ability to pay dividends to the holders of our common stock. Our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, which may adversely affect the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, holders of our common stock bear the risk that our future offerings may reduce the market price of our common stock and dilute their stockholdings in us. See “Description of Capital Stock.”

We do not intend to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable future.

We intend to retain all of our earnings for the foreseeable future to fund the operation and growth of our business and to repay indebtedness, and therefore, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends to holders of our capital stock for the foreseeable future. Any future determination regarding the payment of any dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, capital

36

Table of Contents

requirements, liquidity, contractual restrictions, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. Consequently, investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize any future gains on their investment. Investors seeking cash dividends should not invest in our common stock.

Our future capital requirements are uncertain, and we may have difficulty raising money in the future on acceptable terms, if at all.

Our capital requirements depend on many factors, including the amounts required to open new restaurants and to service our indebtedness. To the extent that our capital resources are insufficient to meet these requirements, we may need to raise additional funds through financings or curtail our growth, reduce our costs and expenses, or sell certain of our assets. Any additional equity offerings or debt financings may be on terms that are not favorable to us. Equity offerings could result in dilution to our stockholders, and equity or debt securities issued in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of our common stock. If our need for capital arises because of significant losses, the occurrence of these losses may make it more difficult for us to raise the necessary capital.

Purchasers of common stock in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution.

If you purchase shares of our common stock in this offering, the value of those shares based on our book value will immediately be less than the price you paid. This reduction in the value of your shares is known as dilution. Dilution occurs mainly because our earlier investors paid substantially less than the initial public offering price when they acquired their shares of our capital stock. If you purchase shares in this offering, you will incur immediate dilution of $20.85 in the net tangible book value per share. In addition, if we raise funds through equity offerings in the future, the newly issued shares will further dilute your percentage ownership interest in our company.

As a result of the completion of this offering, we will record a significant non-cash equity-based compensation charge due to the vesting of stock option rights and we may record a significant loss in the fiscal quarter in which this offering is completed.

Certain of our executive officers and employees have been granted stock options pursuant to our 2012 Plan. Of the 2,197,382 stock options outstanding as of May 1, 2015, 2,177,222 have performance-based vesting conditions and do not vest until the completion of a liquidity event occurs. We account for stock options granted to employees and directors with performance-based vesting conditions in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, Compensation — Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). In accordance with ASC 718, we do not recognize compensation expense for awards with performance-based vesting conditions until the outcome of such performance condition becomes probable. Accordingly, upon the completion of this offering, we will record a non-cash equity-based compensation charge of approximately $5.7 million. As a result, we may incur a net loss during the fiscal quarter in which this offering is completed.

Provisions of our charter documents, Delaware law and other documents could discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition at a premium price.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws include provisions that:

37

Table of Contents

These provisions may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition of our company, including a transaction in which the acquiror may offer a premium price for our common stock.

Our 2012 Plan also permits vesting of stock options and restricted stock, and payments to be made to the employees thereunder, in connection with a change of control of our company, which could discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition at a premium price. In addition, our Senior Credit Facilities include, and our New Credit Facility will include, and other debt incurred by us in the future may include, provisions entitling the lenders to demand immediate repayment of borrowings upon the occurrence of certain change of control events relating to our company, which also could discourage, delay or prevent a business combination transaction.

The market price of our common stock could decline if securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our company or if they downgrade us or other restaurant companies in our industry.

The market price of our common stock will depend, in part, on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. We do not influence or control the reporting of these analysts. In addition, if no analysts provide coverage of our company or if one or more of the analysts who do cover us downgrade shares of our company or other companies in our industry, the market price of our common stock could be negatively impacted. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company, we could lose visibility in the market, which could, in turn, cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

We may be required to make payments to the underwriters if participants in our directed share program fail to pay for and accept shares that were subject to properly confirmed orders.

At our request, the underwriters have reserved for sale to our directors, officers, certain employees and certain other related parties at the initial public offering price up to 5% of the shares of our common stock being offered in this offering. We do not know if any of these persons will choose to purchase all or any portion of the reserved shares, but any purchases made by them will reduce the number of shares available to the general public. If all of these reserved shares are not purchased, the underwriters will offer the remainder to the general public on the same terms as the other shares of our common stock in this offering. In connection with the sale of these reserved shares, we have agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain liabilities, including those that may be caused by the failure of the participants in the directed share program to pay for and accept delivery of shares of our common stock which were subject to a properly confirmed agreement to purchase. As a result, if participants in the directed share program fail to pay for and accept delivery of the shares of our common stock which they agreed to purchase, we will be required to indemnify the underwriters for losses incurred by them as a result of such failure.

The future issuance of additional common stock in connection with our incentive plans, acquisitions or otherwise will dilute all other stockholdings.

After this offering, assuming the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full, we will have an aggregate of 1,200,000 shares of common stock authorized but unissued and not reserved for issuance under our incentive plans (including 138,000 shares of our common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options we expect to grant to employees upon the closing of this offering at an exercise price per share equal to the initial public offering price). We may issue all of these shares of common stock without any action or approval by our stockholders, subject to certain exceptions. Any common stock issued in connection with our incentive plans, the exercise of outstanding stock options or otherwise would dilute the percentage ownership held by the investors who purchase common stock in this offering.

Our costs could increase significantly as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to complying with public company regulations.

As a public company and particularly after we cease to be an “emerging growth company” (to the extent that we take advantage of certain exceptions from reporting requirements that are available under the JOBS Act as an “emerging growth company”), we could incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses not presently incurred.

38

Table of Contents

In addition, Sarbanes-Oxley, as well as rules promulgated by the SEC and the NASDAQ, require us to adopt corporate governance practices applicable to US public companies. These rules and regulations may increase our legal and financial compliance costs.

Sarbanes-Oxley, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC and the NASDAQ, have imposed increased disclosure and enhanced corporate governance practices for public companies. We are committed to maintaining high standards of corporate governance and public disclosure, and our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards are likely to result in increased expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. We may not be successful in implementing these requirements and implementing them could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if we fail to implement the requirements with respect to our internal accounting and audit functions, our ability to report our financial results on a timely and accurate basis could be impaired.

We are an “emerging growth company” and may elect to comply with reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, which could make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. In addition, even if we comply with the greater obligations of public companies that are not emerging growth companies immediately after the initial public offering, we may avail ourselves of the reduced requirements applicable to emerging growth companies from time to time in the future. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive if we choose to rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

Section 107 of the JOBS Act also provides that an “emerging growth company” can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. However, we are choosing to opt out of any extended transition period, and as a result we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that our decision to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards is irrevocable.

We will remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years, or until the earliest of (i) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenues exceed $1 billion, (ii) the date that we become a “large accelerated filer” as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), which would occur if the market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the last business day of our most recently completed second fiscal quarter, or (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during the preceding three year period.

We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, and if we are unable to establish and maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act it could have a material adverse effect on our business and stock price.

We are not currently required to comply with the rules of the SEC implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and therefore are not required to make a formal assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for that purpose. Upon the completion of this offering, we will be required to comply with the SEC’s rules implementing Section 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which will require management to certify financial and other information in our quarterly and annual reports and provide an annual management report on the effectiveness of control over financial reporting. Though we will be required to disclose changes made in our internal controls and procedures on a quarterly basis, we will not be required to make our first annual assessment of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 until the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the

39

Table of Contents

SEC. In order to have effective internal control over financial reporting, we will need to implement additional control activities, implement restricted access and other IT general controls, write and implement formal accounting policies, and hire additional qualified accounting, financial, and legal staff. Pursuant to the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting until the later of the year following our first annual report required to be filed with the SEC or the date we are no longer an emerging growth company, which may be up to five full fiscal years following this offering.

In connection with the audit of our financial statements for the period ended December 29, 2013, for the Successor period from May 24, 2012 to December 30, 2012, and the Predecessor period from January 2, 2012 to July 20, 2012, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In particular, we did not design an effective control environment with sufficient personnel with the appropriate level of accounting knowledge, experience and training to assess the completeness and accuracy of the technical accounting matters, principally related to accounting for business combinations and accounting for modifications of debt instruments, nor did we have a sufficient number of accounting personnel to allow for appropriate segregation of duties or thorough review and supervision of our financial closing process. We also did not design, maintain or implement effective control activities relating to formal accounting policies. Specifically, we did not design, maintain or implement policies and procedures to adequately review and account for transactions that arise in the normal course of business, which limited our ability to make accounting decisions and to detect and correct accounting errors.

The lack of adequate staffing levels and effective policies and controls resulted in several audit adjustments and a restatement of our operating subsidiary financial statements for the Successor period ended December 30, 2012 and the Predecessor period ended July 20, 2012. Additionally, these resulted in a revision to our December 29, 2013 consolidated financial statements. As of the date hereof, we have not fully re-designed, implemented and tested internal controls to remediate the material weaknesses. While we have begun the process of evaluating the design and operation of our internal control over financial reporting, we are in the early phases and may not complete our evaluation until after this offering is completed. We cannot predict the outcome of our evaluation at this time. During the course of the evaluation, we may identify additional control deficiencies, which could give rise to other material weaknesses, in addition to the material weaknesses described above. Each of the material weaknesses described above or any newly identified material weakness could result in a misstatement of our financial statements or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.

We have taken initial steps to remediate the material weaknesses such as hiring additional accounting personnel in Fiscal 2014, including a chief financial officer, a director of financial reporting and a corporate treasury analyst. We cannot be certain that these measures will successfully remediate the material weaknesses or that other material weaknesses and control deficiencies will not be discovered in the future. If our efforts are not successful or other material weaknesses or control deficiencies occur in the future, we may be unable to report our financial results accurately on a timely basis or help prevent fraud, which could cause our reported financial results to be materially misstated and result in the loss of investor confidence or delisting and cause the market price of our common stock to decline.

Internal control over financial reporting has inherent limitations. Internal control over financial reporting is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. Internal control over financial reporting also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override. Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk. If we are unable to maintain proper and effective internal controls, we may not be able to produce timely and accurate financial statements, and we and our independent registered public accounting firm may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective. If that were to happen, the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities. Testing and maintaining internal controls could also divert our management’s attention from other matters that are important to the operation of our business.

40

Table of Contents