NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

April 30, 2015

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The information furnished herein reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of April 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014, the condensed consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the three and six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six month periods ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 of Greif, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”). The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Greif, Inc., all wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiaries and investments in limited liability companies, partnerships and joint ventures in which it has controlling influence. Non-majority owned entities include investments in limited liability companies, partnerships and joint ventures in which the Company does not have controlling influence and are accounted for using either the equity or cost method, as appropriate.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Form 10-Q”) should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended October 31, 2014 (the “2014 Form 10-K”).

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) instructions to Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates.

The Company’s fiscal year begins on November 1 and ends on October 31 of the following year. Any references to the year 2015 or 2014, or to any quarter of those years, relates to the fiscal year or quarter, as the case may be, ended in that year. The 2014 amounts have been restated. See Note 20 – Quarterly Financial Data in the Company’s 2014 Form 10-K.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2015 presentation.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-03, “Interest—Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30)”. The objective of this update is to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs in the financial statements. Under the ASU, the Company would present such costs in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset; amortization of the costs is reported as interest expense. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2016. The Company would apply the new guidance retrospectively to all prior periods (i.e., the balance sheet for each period is adjusted). The ASU requires the Company to “disclose in the first fiscal year after the entity’s adoption date, and in the interim periods within the first fiscal year, the following: (1) The nature and reason for the change in accounting principle; (2) The transition method; (3) A description of the prior-period information that has been retrospectively adjusted; (4) The effect of the change on the financial statement line item (that is, the debt issuance costs asset and the debt liability). The Company has not yet determined the potential impact of adopting this guidance on its financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income, cash flow and disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605, Revenue Recognition. This ASU is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty

8

Table of Contents

of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The update is effective in fiscal 2019 using one of two retrospective application methods. The Company has not yet determined the potential impact of adopting this guidance on its financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income, cash flow and disclosures.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern: Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as Going Concern”. The objective of this update is to reduce the diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures related to going concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. This update applies to all entities that would be required to disclose information about its potential inability to continue as a going concern when “substantial doubt” about their ability to continue as a going concern exists. The Company will be required to evaluate “relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued.” The Company will have to document their consideration of the ASU, but not because the Company believes there is substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is expected to adopt this guidance beginning November 1, 2017, and the adoption of the new guidance is not expected to impact the Company’s financial position, results of operations, comprehensive income or cash flows, other than the related disclosures.

Note: Purchase price, net of cash acquired, represents cash paid in the period of each acquisition and does not include assumed debt, subsequent payments for deferred purchase adjustments or earn-out provisions.

The Company completed seven divestitures and no material acquisitions for the six months ended April 30, 2015. The divestitures were of nonstrategic businesses, five in the Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services segment and two in the Flexible Products & Services segment. The loss on disposal of businesses was $9.6 million for the six months ended April 30, 2015. Proceeds from divestitures were $12.5 million. Additionally, the Company has recorded notes receivable of $7.4 million for the sale of these businesses, ranging in terms of up to five years.

The Company completed two acquisitions and no material divestitures for the six months ended April 30, 2014. One acquisition was in the Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services segment and the other acquisition was in the Paper Packaging segment. The rigid industrial packaging acquisition was made to complement the Company’s existing product lines and provide growth opportunities and economies of scale. The paper packaging acquisition was made in part to obtain technologies, equipment, and customer lists. The loss on disposal of businesses was $0.6 million for the six months ended April 30, 2014.

The Company sold membership units of a consolidated subsidiary during the six months ended April 30, 2014.

NOTE 3 — SALE OF NON-UNITED STATES ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

On April 27, 2012, Cooperage Receivables Finance B.V. and Greif Coordination Center BVBA, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc., entered into the Nieuw Amsterdam Receivables Purchase Agreement (the “European RPA”) with affiliates of a major international bank. On April 20, 2015, Cooperage Receivables Finance B.V. and Greif Coordination Center BVBA amended and extended the term of existing European RPA for an additional two years. Under the European RPA as amended, the number of entities participating in the agreement have decreased to now include only the following entities: Greif Belgium BVBA, EarthMinded Benelux N.V. (formerly Pack2pack Rumbeke N.V.), Greif Nederland B.V., Greif Italia S.p.A., Greif Plastics Italy Srl (formerly Fustiplast S.p.A.), Greif France S.A.S., Greif Packaging Spain S.A., Greif Germany GmbH, Greif Plastics Germany GmbH (formerly Fustiplast GmbH), and Greif Portugal S.A. Additionally, the terms have been amended to decrease the maximum amount of receivables that may be sold and outstanding under the agreement at any time to €100 million ($108.9 million as of April 30, 2015).

9

Table of Contents

In October 2007, Greif Singapore Pte. Ltd., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc., entered into the Singapore Receivable Purchase Agreement (the “Singapore RPA”) with a major international bank. The maximum amount of aggregate receivables that may be financed under the Singapore RPA is 15.0 million Singapore Dollars ($11.3 million as of April 30, 2015).

In May 2009, Greif Malaysia Sdn Bhd., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Greif, Inc., entered into the Malaysian Receivables Purchase Agreement (the “Malaysian Agreement”) with Malaysian banks. In March 2014, the Malaysian Agreement was discontinued and therefore there were no receivables held by third party financial institutions under this agreement as of April 30, 2015.

The table below contains certain information related to the Company’s accounts receivables programs (Dollars in millions):

The table below contains certain information related to the Company’s accounts receivables programs and the impact it has on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Dollars in millions):

The deferred purchase price related to the accounts receivable sold is reflected as prepaid expenses and other current assets or other current liabilities on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets and was initially recorded at an amount which approximates its fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. The cash received initially and the deferred purchase price relate to the sale or ultimate collection of the underlying receivables and are not subject to significant other risks given their short-term nature; therefore, the Company reflects all cash flows under the accounts receivable sales programs as operating cash flows on the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

10

Table of Contents

Additionally, the Company performs collections and administrative functions on the receivables sold, similar to the procedures it uses for collecting all of its receivables, including receivables that are not sold under the RPAs. The servicing liability for these receivables is not material to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 5 — ASSETS AND LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE AND DISPOSALS OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET

As of April 30, 2015, there were four asset groups in the Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services segment, one asset group in the Paper Packaging segment and two asset groups in the Flexible Products & Services segment classified as assets and liabilities held for sale. As of October 31, 2014, there were three asset groups in the Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services segment, one asset group in the Flexible Products & Services segment and one asset group in the Land Management segment classified as assets and liabilities held for sale. During the six months ended April 30, 2015, two asset groups previously classified as held for sale within the Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services segment were sold and another asset group consisting of higher and better use (“HBU”) and surplus properties previously classified as held for sale within the Land Management segment were sold. The assets and liabilities held for sale are being marketed for sale, and it is the Company’s intention to complete the sales of these assets within the upcoming year.

For the three months ended April 30, 2015, the Company recorded a gain on disposal of property, plants and equipment, net of $0.7 million. There were sales of HBU and surplus properties which resulted in gains of $0.9 million in the Land Management segment and sales of other miscellaneous equipment which resulted in aggregate losses of $0.2 million.

For the six months ended April 30, 2015, the Company recorded a gain on disposal of property, plants and equipment, net of $2.3 million. There were sales of HBU and surplus properties which resulted in gains of $1.3 million in the Land Management segment, a disposal of an asset in the Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services segment that resulted in a gain of $0.9 million, and sales of other miscellaneous equipment which resulted in aggregate gains of $0.1 million. None of these were previously classified as held for sale.

For the three and six months ended April 30, 2015, the Company recorded immaterial gains and gains of $24.3 million, respectively, relating to the sale of timberland. For the three and six months ended April 30, 2014, the Company recorded gains of $8.7 million and $17.1 million, respectively, relating to the sale of timberland.

11

Table of Contents

Goodwill decreased by $66.8 million for the six month period ended April 30, 2015. The decrease in goodwill was primarily related to foreign currency translation and goodwill allocated to divestitures and businesses held for sale.

The following table summarizes the carrying amount of net intangible assets by class as of April 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014 (Dollars in millions):

Amortization expense for the three months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 was $4.6 million and $5.6 million, respectively. Amortization expense for the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 was $9.4 million and $10.9 million, respectively. Amortization expense for the next five years is expected to be $18.7 million in 2015, $18.2 million in 2016, $17.4 million in 2017, $17.0 million in 2018 and $16.9 million in 2019.

12

Table of Contents

Definite lived intangible assets for the periods presented are subject to amortization and are being amortized using the straight-line method over periods that are contractually, legally determined or over the period which a market participant would benefit from the asset.

The focus for restructuring activities in 2015 is to continue to rationalize operations and close underperforming assets throughout all segments. During the three months ended April 30, 2015, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $7.3 million, which compares to $3.9 million of restructuring charges during the three months ended April 30, 2014. The restructuring activity for the three months ended April 30, 2015 consisted of $5.0 million in employee separation costs and $2.3 million in other restructuring costs, primarily consisting of professional fees incurred for services specifically associated with employee separation. During the six months ended April 30, 2015, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $10.5 million, which compares to $6.3 million of restructuring charges during the six months ended April 30, 2014. The restructuring activity for the six months ended April 30, 2015 consisted of $7.7 million in employee separation costs and $2.8 million in other restructuring costs, primarily consisting of professional fees incurred for services specifically associated with employee separation.

The following is a reconciliation of the total amounts expected to be incurred from open restructuring plans or plans that are being formulated and have not been announced as of the date of this Form 10-Q. Remaining amounts expected to be incurred were $16.3 million and $9.2 million as of April 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014, respectively. The change was due to the formulation of new plans during the period offset by the realization of expenses from plans formulated in prior periods. (Dollars in millions):

13

Table of Contents

NOTE 8 — CONSOLIDATION OF VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

The Company evaluates whether an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) upon acquisition and whenever reconsideration events occur. The Company consolidates VIEs for which it is the primary beneficiary. If the Company is not the primary beneficiary and an ownership interest is held, the VIE is accounted for under the equity or cost methods of accounting, as appropriate. When assessing the determination of the primary beneficiary, the Company considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including: the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIEs economic performance; and the obligation to absorb the expected losses and/or the right to receive the expected returns of the VIE.

Significant Nonstrategic Timberland Transactions

In 2005, the Company sold certain timber properties to Plum Creek Timberlands, L.P. (“Plum Creek”) in a series of transactions that included the creation of two separate legal entities that are now consolidated as separate VIEs. One is an indirect subsidiary of Plum Creek (the “Buyer SPE”), and the other is STA Timber LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“STA Timber”). As of April 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014, consolidated assets of Buyer SPE consisted of $50.9 million of restricted bank financial instruments which are expected to be held to maturity. For both of the three month periods ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, Buyer SPE recorded interest income of $0.6 million. For both of the six month periods ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, Buyer SPE recorded interest income of $1.2 million.

As of April 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014, STA Timber had consolidated long-term debt of $43.3 million. For both of the three month periods ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, STA Timber recorded interest expense of $0.6 million. For both of the six month periods ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, STA Timber recorded interest expense of $1.2 million. The intercompany borrowing arrangement between the two VIEs is eliminated in consolidation. STA Timber is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by an issuer of a deed of guarantee in the transaction.

Flexible Packaging Joint Venture

On September 29, 2010, Greif, Inc. and its indirect subsidiary Greif International Holding Supra C.V. (“Greif Supra”) formed a joint venture (referred to herein as the “Flexible Packaging JV”) with Dabbagh Group Holding Company Limited and its subsidiary National Scientific Company Limited (“NSC”). The Flexible Packaging JV owns the operations in the Flexible Products & Services segment, with the exception of the North American multiwall packaging business, which was sold in August 2014. The Flexible Packaging JV has been consolidated into the operations of the Company as of its formation date of September 29, 2010.

All entities contributed to the Flexible Packaging JV were existing businesses acquired by Greif Supra and that were reorganized under Greif Flexibles Asset Holding B.V. and Greif Flexibles Trading Holding B.V. (“Asset Co.” and “Trading Co.”), respectively. The Flexible Packaging J.V. also includes Global Textile Company LLC (“Global Textile”), which owned and operated a fabric hub in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia that commenced operations in the fourth quarter of 2012 and ceased operations in the fourth quarter of 2014.

The following table presents the Flexible Packaging JV total net assets (Dollars in millions):

14

Table of Contents

Net losses attributable to the noncontrolling interest in the Flexible Packaging JV for the three months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 were $3.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively; and for the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, net losses attributable to the noncontrolling interest were $6.3 million and $5.5 million, respectively.

Amended Credit Agreement

On December 19, 2012, the Company and two of its international subsidiaries amended and restated the Company’s existing $1.0 billion senior secured credit agreement with a syndicate of financial institutions (the “Amended Credit Agreement”). The total available borrowing under this facility was $709.3 million as of April 30, 2015, which has been reduced by $14.4 million for outstanding letters of credit, all of which is available without violating covenants.

The Amended Credit Agreement contains financial covenants that require the Company to maintain a certain leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio. The leverage ratio generally requires that at the end of any fiscal quarter the Company will not permit the ratio of (a) the Company’s total consolidated indebtedness, to (b) the Company’s consolidated net income plus depreciation, depletion and amortization, interest expense (including capitalized interest), income taxes, and minus certain extraordinary gains and non-recurring gains (or plus certain extraordinary losses and non-recurring losses) and plus or minus certain other items for the preceding twelve months (“adjusted EBITDA”) to be greater than 4.00 to 1. The interest coverage ratio generally requires that at the end of any fiscal quarter the Company will not permit the ratio of (a) the Company’s consolidated adjusted EBITDA to (b) the Company’s consolidated interest expense to the extent paid or payable, to be less than 3.00 to 1, during the preceding twelve month period (the “Interest Coverage Ratio Covenant”).

As of April 30, 2015, $223.0 million was outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement. The current portion of the Amended Credit Agreement was $17.3 million and the long-term portion was $205.7 million. The weighted average interest rate on the Amended Credit Agreement was 1.55% for the six months ended April 30, 2015. The actual interest rate on the Amended Credit Agreement was 1.54% as of April 30, 2015.

Senior Notes due 2017

On February 9, 2007, the Company issued $300.0 million of 6.75% Senior Notes due February 1, 2017. Interest on these Senior Notes is payable semi-annually.

Senior Notes due 2019

On July 28, 2009, the Company issued $250.0 million of 7.75% Senior Notes due August 1, 2019. Interest on these Senior Notes is payable semi-annually.

Senior Notes due 2021

On July 15, 2011, Greif, Inc.’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Greif Nevada Holdings, Inc., S.C.S. (formerly Greif Luxembourg Finance S.C.A.) issued € 200.0 million of 7.375% Senior Notes due July 15, 2021. These Senior Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by Greif, Inc. Interest on these Senior Notes is payable semi-annually.

15

Table of Contents

United States Trade Accounts Receivable Credit Facility

Prior to September 30, 2013, the Company had a $130 million U.S. trade accounts receivable credit facility with a financial institution (the “Prior Receivables Facility”). On September 30, 2013, the Company amended and restated the Prior Receivables Facility to establish a $170.0 million United States Trade Accounts Receivable Credit Facility (the “Amended Receivables Facility”) with a financial institution. The Amended Receivables Facility matures in September 2016.

NOTE 10 — FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Financial Instruments

The Company uses derivatives from time to time to mitigate partially the effect of exposure to interest rate movements, exposure to currency translation and energy cost fluctuations. Under ASC 815, “Derivatives and Hedging”, all derivatives are to be recognized as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measured at fair value. Changes in the fair value of derivatives are recognized in either net income or in other comprehensive income, depending on the designated purpose of the derivative.

While the Company may be exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties to its derivative financial instrument contracts, its counterparties are established banks and financial institutions with high credit ratings. The Company has no reason to believe that such counterparties will not be able to fully satisfy their obligations under these contracts.

During the next twelve months, the Company does not expect to reclassify any amount into earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income at the time the underlying hedge transactions are realized.

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements for financial and non-financial assets and liabilities. Additionally, this guidance established a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. This hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.

The three levels of inputs used to measure fair values are as follows:

16

Table of Contents

Interest Rate Derivatives

As of April 30, 2015, the Company has no interest rate derivatives.

The Company had interest rate swap agreements with various maturities through December 2014. These interest rate swap agreements were used to manage the Company’s fixed and floating rate debt mix, specifically the Amended Credit Agreement. The assumptions that were used in measuring fair value of the interest rate derivatives were considered level 2 inputs, which were based on interest from the counterparties based upon LIBOR and interest paid based upon a designated fixed rate over the life of the swap agreements. These derivative instruments were designated and qualified as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the effective portion of the gain or loss on these derivative instruments was reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period during which the hedged transaction affected earnings. The ineffective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument was recognized in earnings immediately.

Through December 2014, the Company had two interest rate derivatives (floating to fixed swap agreements designated as cash flow hedges) with a total notional amount of $150 million. Under these swap agreements, the Company received interest based upon a variable interest rate from the counterparties and paid interest based upon a fixed interest rate. Losses reclassified to earnings under these contracts were $0.2 million for the three months ended April 30, 2014; and were $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These losses were recorded within the condensed consolidated statements of income as interest expense, net. The fair value of these contracts was $0.2 million recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of October 31, 2014.

Foreign Exchange Hedges

The Company conducts business in various international currencies and is subject to risks associated with changing foreign exchange rates. The Company’s objective is to reduce volatility associated with foreign exchange rate changes. Accordingly, the Company enters into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to protect the value of certain existing foreign currency assets and liabilities, commitments and anticipated foreign currency cash flows.

As of April 30, 2015, the Company had outstanding foreign currency forward contracts in the notional amount of $92.9 million ($122.4 million as of October 31, 2014). At April 30, 2015, these derivative instruments were designated and qualified as fair value hedges. Adjustments to fair value for fair value hedges are recognized in earnings, offsetting the impact of the hedged item. The assumptions used in measuring fair value of foreign exchange hedges are considered level 2 inputs, which were based on observable market pricing for similar instruments, principally foreign exchange futures contracts. (Gains) losses recorded under fair value contracts were $1.2 million and ($2.0) million for the three months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively; and were $6.8 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

Other financial instruments

The fair values of the Company’s Amended Credit Agreement and the Amended Receivables Facility do not materially differ from carrying value as the Company’s cost of borrowing is variable and approximates current borrowing rates. The fair values of the Company’s long-term obligations are estimated based on either the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or the current interest rates offered for the debt of the same remaining maturities, which are considered level 2 inputs in accordance with ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.

17

Table of Contents

The following table presents the estimated fair values for the Company’s Senior Notes and the Assets held by special purpose entities (Dollars in millions):

Long-Lived Assets

The Company recognized asset impairment charges of $4.5 million during the three months ended April 30, 2015 and an immaterial amount for the three months ended April 30, 2014. As a result of the Company measuring long-lived assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis, during the three months ended April 30, 2015 these impairment charges included $4.2 million of impairment charges related to plant closures within the Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services segment. The Company recognized asset impairment charges of $4.7 million and $0.2 million during the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. These charges included $4.2 million of impairment charges related to plant closures within the Rigid Industrial Packaging & Services segment.

The assumptions used in measuring fair value of long-lived assets are considered level 3 inputs, which include bids received from third parties, recent purchase offers, market comparable information and discounted cash flows based on assumptions that market participants would use. The following table presents quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used to determine the fair value of the impairment of long-lived assets held and used for the six months ended April 30, 2015. Impairment of long-lived assets held and used for the six months ended April 30, 2014 is immaterial.

Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale

The assumptions used in measuring fair value of assets and liabilities held for sale are considered level 3 inputs, which include recent purchase offers, market comparables and/or data obtained from commercial real estate brokers. During the six month period ended April 30, 2015, the Company recorded no additional impairment related to assets which were previously classified as assets and liabilities held for sale. During the six month period ended April 30, 2014, the Company recorded no impairment related to assets which were previously classified as assets and liabilities held for sale.

18

Table of Contents

Goodwill and Long Lived Intangible Assets

On an annual basis or whenever events or circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred, the Company performs impairment tests for goodwill and long lived intangible assets as defined under ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other.” The Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $0.5 million based on the estimated fair value of a business classified as held for sale as of April 30, 2015.

NOTE 11 — INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was $9.6 million and $19.5 million for the three months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The effective tax rate was 31.6 percent and 34.5 percent for the three months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The lower effective tax rate for the three months ended April 30, 2015 reflects the impact of the divestitures of businesses and the associated discrete tax benefits of $8.1 million. The lower effective tax rate for the three months ended April 30, 2015 also includes discrete tax benefits related to a reduction in uncertain tax positions resulting from the conclusion of certain tax examinations and expiring statutes of limitations with non-U.S. jurisdictions in the amount of $2.1 million. Income tax expense was $27.1 million and $36.0 million for the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The effective tax rate was 35.6 percent and 34.4 percent for the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

As of April 30, 2015, the Company had not recognized U.S. deferred income taxes on the undistributed earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries. It is the Company’s belief that as of April 30, 2015 such earnings are indefinitely reinvested outside of the U.S. and determining the unrecognized deferred tax liability related to investments in these non-U.S. subsidiaries that are indefinitely reinvested is not practicable.

The Company made $7.1 million in pension contributions in the six months ended April 30, 2015. The Company estimates $14.2 million of pension contributions for the twelve months ended October 31, 2015.

The components of net periodic cost for postretirement benefits include the following (Dollars in millions):

19

Table of Contents

NOTE 13 — CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESERVES

Litigation-related Liabilities

The Company may become involved from time-to-time in litigation and regulatory matters incidental to its business, including governmental investigations, enforcement actions, personal injury claims, product liability, employment health and safety matters, commercial disputes, intellectual property matters, disputes regarding environmental clean-up costs, litigation in connection with acquisitions and divestitures, and other matters arising out of the normal conduct of its business. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself in such litigation. The Company does not believe that the outcome of any pending litigation will have a material adverse effect on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

The Company may accrue for contingencies related to litigation and regulatory matters if it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Because litigation is inherently unpredictable and unfavorable resolutions can occur, assessing contingencies is highly subjective and requires judgments about future events. The Company reviews contingencies at least quarterly to determine whether its accruals are adequate. The amount of ultimate loss may differ from these estimates.

Environmental Reserves

As of April 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014, environmental reserves of $9.8 million and $24.7 million, respectively, were recorded on an undiscounted basis. These reserves are principally based on environmental studies and cost estimates provided by third parties, but also take into account management estimates. The estimated liabilities are reduced to reflect the anticipated participation of other potentially responsible parties in those instances where it is probable that such parties are legally responsible and financially capable of paying their respective shares of relevant costs. For sites that involve formal actions subject to joint and several liabilities, these actions have formal agreements in place to apportion the liability. As of April 30, 2015 and October 31, 2014, environmental reserves of the Company included $0.8 million and $13.7 million, respectively, for a blending facility in Chicago, Illinois; $5.6 million and $6.8 million, respectively, for various European drum facilities acquired from Blagden and Van Leer; $2.1 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for its various container life cycle management and recycling facilities acquired in 2011 and 2010; and $1.3 million and $1.6 million for various other facilities around the world. The $12.9 million decrease in environmental reserve for the blending facility located in Chicago is a result of the divestment of the subsidiary that owns this facility during the second quarter of 2015.

The Company’s exposure to adverse developments with respect to any individual site is not expected to be material. Although environmental remediation could have a material effect on results of operations if a series of adverse developments occur in a particular quarter or year, the Company believes that the chance of a series of adverse developments occurring in the same quarter or year is remote. Future information and developments will require the Company to continually reassess the expected impact of these environmental matters.

NOTE 14 —EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company has two classes of common stock and, as such, applies the “two-class method” of computing earnings per share (“EPS”) as prescribed in ASC 260, “Earnings Per Share.” In accordance with this guidance, earnings are allocated first to Class A and Class B Common Stock to the extent that dividends are actually paid and the remainder allocated assuming all of the earnings for the period have been distributed in the form of dividends.

The Company calculates Class A EPS as follows: (i) multiply 40 percent times the average Class A shares outstanding, then divide that amount by the product of 40 percent of the average Class A shares outstanding plus 60 percent of the average Class B shares outstanding to get a percentage, (ii) undistributed net income divided by the average Class A shares outstanding, (iii) multiply item (i) by item (ii), (iv) add item (iii) to the Class A cash dividend per share. Diluted shares are factored into the Class A calculation.

The Company calculates Class B EPS as follows: (i) multiply 60 percent times the average Class B shares outstanding, then divide that amount by the product of 40 percent of the average Class A shares outstanding plus 60 percent of the average Class B shares outstanding to get a percentage, (ii) undistributed net income divided by the average Class B shares outstanding, (iii) multiply item (i) by item (ii), (iv) add item (iii) to the Class B cash dividend per share. Class B diluted EPS is identical to Class B basic EPS.

20

Table of Contents

The following table provides EPS information for each period, respectively:

Class A Common Stock is entitled to cumulative dividends of one cent a share per year after which Class B Common Stock is entitled to non-cumulative dividends up to a half-cent a share per year. Further distribution in any year must be made in proportion of one cent a share for Class A Common Stock to one and a half cents a share for Class B Common Stock. The Class A Common Stock has no voting rights unless four quarterly cumulative dividends upon the Class A Common Stock are in arrears. The Class B Common Stock has full voting rights. There is no cumulative voting for the election of directors.

Common stock repurchases

The Company’s Board of Directors has authorized the purchase of up to four million shares of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock or any combination of the foregoing. During the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company repurchased no shares of Class A or Class B Common Stock, respectively. As of April 30, 2015, the Company had repurchased 3,184,272 shares, including 1,425,452 shares of Class A Common Stock and 1,758,820 shares of Class B Common Stock, under this program, all of which were repurchased in prior years. There have been no shares repurchased from November 1, 2013 through April 30, 2015.

The following table summarizes the Company’s Class A and Class B common and treasury shares as of the specified dates:

The following is a reconciliation of the shares used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share:

No stock options were antidilutive for the six month period ended April 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

21

Table of Contents

NOTE 15 – EQUITY EARNINGS (LOSSES) OF UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES, NET OF TAX AND NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS

Equity earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax

Equity earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax represent the Company’s share of earnings of affiliates in which the Company does not exercise control and has a 20 percent or more voting interest. Investments in such affiliates are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. If the fair value of an investment in an affiliate is below its carrying value and the difference is deemed to be other than temporary, the difference between the fair value and the carrying value is charged to earnings. The Company has an equity interest in two such affiliates as of April 30, 2015. The Company had an equity interest in three such affiliates as of April 30, 2014. Equity earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax for the three months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 were ($0.3) million and $0.1 million, respectively. There were no dividends received from the Company’s equity method affiliates for the three months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014. Equity earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax for the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 were ($0.3) million and $0.2 million, respectively. There were no dividends received from the Company’s equity method affiliates for the six months ended April 30, 2015, compared to $0.2 million for the six months ended April 30, 2014.

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests represent the portion of losses from the operations of the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries attributable to unrelated third party equity owners that were added to net income to arrive at net income attributable to the Company. Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests for the three months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 was $0.3 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests for the six months ended April 30, 2015 and 2014 was $2.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively.