RISK FACTORS AND CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In considering whether to consent to the proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement in connection with the Redomicile Merger, you should consider carefully the following risks or investment considerations, in addition to the other information in this consent solicitation statement/prospectus. In addition, please note that this consent solicitation statement/prospectus contains or incorporates by reference “forward-looking statements” and “forward-looking information” under applicable securities laws. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about the Redomicile Merger and reorganization and our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions with respect to future operations, including the benefits or impact described in this consent solicitation statement/prospectus that we expect to achieve as a result of the Redomicile Merger and reorganization. You can find many of these statements by looking for words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “continues,” “may,” “intends,” “plans” or similar expressions in this consent solicitation statement/prospectus. Any forward-looking statements in this consent solicitation statement/prospectus reflect only expectations that are current as of the date of this consent solicitation statement/prospectus, are not guarantees of performance, and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond our ability to control. Further, these forward-looking statements are based on assumptions with respect to business strategies and decisions that are subject to change. Actual results or performance may differ materially from those we express in our forward-looking statements. Except as may be required by applicable securities laws, we disclaim any obligation or undertaking to disseminate any updates or revisions to our statements, forward-looking or otherwise, to reflect changes in our expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statements are based.

Set forth below, we have identified the factors, among others, that you should consider before making a decision on whether or not to consent to adopt the Merger Agreement, and we have identified certain of the risks that could cause our actual plans or results to differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference herein. You should consider these risks when deciding whether to consent to adopt the Merger Agreement. In addition, you should also review carefully the risks affecting our business generally that could also cause our actual plans or results to differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements contained or incorporated by reference herein.

Risks Relating to the Redomicile Merger and Reorganization

Your rights as a shareholder of the Company will change as a result of the Redomicile Merger and you may not be afforded as many rights as a shareholder of SPI Energy under applicable laws and SPI Energy’s memorandum and articles of association as you were as a shareholder of the Company under applicable laws and the Company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws.

Because of differences between California law and Cayman Islands law and differences between the governing documents of the Company and SPI Energy, we are unable to adopt governing documents for SPI Energy that are identical to the governing documents for the Company, but we have attempted to preserve in the memorandum and articles of association of SPI Energy the same allocation of material rights and powers between the shareholders and our board of directors that exists under the Company’s bylaws and articles of incorporation to the extent permitted by Cayman Islands law. Nevertheless, SPI Energy’s proposed amended and restated memorandum and articles of association differ from the Company’s bylaws and article of incorporation, both in form and substance, and your rights as a shareholder will change. For example:

15

Table of Contents

For a detailed discussion of these and other material differences, please see the comparison chart of your rights as a common shareholder of the Company against your rights as an ordinary shareholder of SPI Energy under the section entitled “Comparison of Rights under California and Cayman Islands Law.”

The laws of the Cayman Islands may not provide SPI Energy shareholders with benefits comparable to those provided to shareholders of corporations incorporated in the United States.

SPI Energy’s corporate affairs are governed by its memorandum and articles of association, as amended and restated from time to time, by the Companies Law (2013 Revision) of the Cayman Islands, or the Companies Law, and by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against SPI Energy’s directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary duties of SPI Energy’s directors to SPI Energy under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands and from English common law, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority but are not binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of SPI Energy’s shareholders and the fiduciary duties of its directors, although clearly established under Cayman Islands law, are not specifically prescribed in statute or a particular document in the same way that they are in certain statutes or judicial precedents in some jurisdictions of the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws relative to the United States. Therefore, SPI Energy’s shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions by SPI Energy’s management, directors or controlling shareholders than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United States. In addition, shareholders of Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action before the federal courts of the United States. The Cayman Island courts are also unlikely to impose liability against SPI Energy, in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands, based on certain civil liabilities provisions of U.S. securities laws.

As a result of different shareholder voting requirements in the Cayman Islands relative to California, we will have less flexibility with respect to our ability to amend our constitutional documents and enter into certain business combinations than we now have.

Under California law and our current bylaws and articles of incorporation, our bylaws and articles of incorporation may be amended by the vote of a majority of shares of stock entitled to vote on the matter to approve the amendment, unless the articles of incorporation requires the vote of a greater number of shares. Cayman Islands law requires a special resolution of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast by those shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy at a general meeting for any amendment to the memorandum and articles of association of SPI Energy. As a result of this Cayman Islands law requirement, situations may arise where the flexibility we now have under California law would have provided benefits to our shareholders that will not be available in the Cayman Islands.

16

Table of Contents

In addition, under Cayman Islands law, certain corporate transactions, such as a merger, require the approval of a special resolution of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast at a general meeting by those shareholders entitled to vote who are present in person or by proxy. By contrast, a merger under California law would only require a simple majority of the outstanding stock of the company entitled to vote thereon. The increased shareholder approval requirements may limit our flexibility to enter into or complete certain business combinations that may be beneficial to shareholders.

For a detailed discussion of the differences in shareholder voting requirements in the Cayman Islands relative to California, please see the section entitled “Comparison of Rights under California and Cayman Islands Law.”

The expected benefits of the Redomicile Merger and reorganization may not be realized.

We have presented in this consent solicitation statement/prospectus the anticipated benefits of the Redomicile Merger and reorganization. Please see the section entitled “Adoption of the Merger Agreement—Background and Reasons for the Redomicile Merger.” We cannot be assured that all of the goals of the Redomicile Merger and reorganization will be achievable, and some or all of the anticipated benefits of the Redomicile Merger and reorganization may not occur, particularly as the achievement of the benefits are in many important respects subject to factors that we do not control. These factors would include such things as the reactions of third parties with whom we enter into contracts and do business and the reactions of investors and analysts. In addition, the anticipated reduction of SEC reporting requirements and related expenses may not be achieved in the event of changes to the SEC rules applicable to foreign private issuers or if we fail to qualify as a foreign private issuer. While we expect the Redomicile Merger and reorganization will enable us to reduce our operational, administrative, legal and accounting costs over the long term, these benefits may not be achieved.

As a foreign private issuer, SPI Energy will not be required to provide its shareholders with the same information as the Company would if the Company remained a U.S. public issuer and, as a result, you may not receive as much information about SPI Energy as you did about the Company and you may not be afforded the same level of protection as a beneficial owner of SPI Energy under applicable laws and the SPI Energy’s memorandum and articles of association as you were as a shareholder of the Company under applicable laws and the Company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws.

Following the completion of the Redomicile Merger, SPI Energy is expected to qualify as a “foreign private issuer” under the rules and regulations of the SEC. SPI Energy will remain subject to the mandates of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. However, as a foreign private issuer, SPI Energy will be exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act that would otherwise apply if SPI Energy were a company incorporated in the United States or did not meet the other conditions to qualify as a foreign private issuer. For example:

17

Table of Contents

Thus, you may not be afforded the same protections or information under applicable laws and SPI Energy’s memorandum and articles of association which would be made available to you if we remain a U.S. corporation with publicly traded securities.

If SPI Energy fails to qualify as a foreign private issuer upon completion of the Redomicile Merger, or loses its status as a foreign private issuer at some future time, SPI Energy would be required to comply fully with the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to U.S. domestic issuers and would incur significant operational, administrative, legal and accounting costs that it would not incur as a foreign private issuer.

Following completion of the Redomicile Merger, SPI Energy is expected to qualify as a “foreign private issuer” under the rules and regulations of the SEC. As a foreign private issuer, SPI Energy will be exempt from certain rules under the Exchange Act that would otherwise apply if SPI Energy were a company incorporated in the United States or did not meet the other conditions to qualify as a foreign private issuer. As a foreign private issuer, SPI Energy will not be required to provide its shareholders with the same information as the Company would if the Company remained a U.S. public issuer and, as a result, you may not receive as much information about SPI Energy as you did about the Company and you may not be afforded the same level of protection as a shareholder of SPI Energy under applicable laws and SPI Energy’s memorandum and articles of association as you were as a shareholder of the Company under applicable laws and the Company’s articles of incorporation and bylaws. While SPI Energy is expected to qualify as a foreign private issuer following the completion of the Redomicile Merger, if SPI Energy fails to qualify as a foreign private issuer upon completion of the Redomicile Merger, or loses its status as a foreign private issuer at some future time, SPI Energy will be required to comply fully with the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to U.S. domestic issuers and would incur significant operational, administrative, legal and accounting costs that it would not incur as a foreign private issuer.

If we prepare our financial statements in accordance with IFRS following the Redomicile Merger, there may be a significant effect on our reported financial results.

The SEC permits foreign private issuers to file financial statements in accordance with IFRS as issued by IASB. At any time in the future, as a foreign private issuer, we may decide to prepare our financial statements in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. The application by us of different accounting standards, a change in the rules of IFRS as issued by the IASB, or in the SEC’s acceptance of such rules, could have a significant effect on our reported financial results. Additionally, U.S. GAAP is subject to interpretation by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC, and various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles. IFRS are subject to interpretation by the IASB. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our reported financial results.

18

Table of Contents

Changes in domestic and foreign laws, including tax law changes, could adversely affect SPI Energy, its subsidiaries and its shareholders, and our effective tax rate may increase whether we effect the Redomicile Merger or not.

Changes in tax laws, regulations or treaties or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, in both or either of the U.S. or Cayman Islands, could adversely affect the tax consequences of the Redomicile Merger to SPI Energy and its shareholders and/or our effective tax rates (whether associated with the Redomicile Merger or otherwise). While the Redomicile Merger is not anticipated to have any material impact on our effective tax rate, there is uncertainty regarding the tax policies of the jurisdictions where we operate, and our effective tax rate may increase and any such increase may be material.

The enforcement of civil liabilities against SPI Energy may be more difficult.

After the Redomicile Merger, substantially all of our executive officers and directors will reside outside of the United States. As a result, it may be more difficult to serve legal process within the United States upon any of these persons and it may also be difficult to enforce, both in and outside of the United States, judgments you may obtain in the U.S. courts against these persons in any action, including actions based upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. federal or state securities laws. Because SPI Energy is a Cayman Islands company, investors could also experience more difficulty enforcing judgments obtained against SPI Energy in U.S. courts than would currently be the case for U.S. judgments obtained against the Company. In addition, it may be more difficult (or impossible) to bring some types of claims against SPI Energy in Cayman Islands courts than it would be to bring similar claims against a U.S. company in a U.S. court.

The market for ADSs representing SPI Energy shares may differ from the market for the Company’s shares.

ADSs representing ordinary shares of SPI Energy may appeal to different institutional investors, or impact the level of investment by current investors who may prefer or be required by internal guidelines to invest in companies that are incorporated in the United States. Accordingly, the reorganization may impact our institutional investor base, or the level of their respective investments in our securities, and may result in a change in the market prices, trading volume and volatility of the ADSs representing SPI Energy ordinary shares from those of our shares.

We expect to incur transaction costs and adverse financial consequences in the year of completion of the Redomicile Merger.

We expect to incur significant transaction costs in connection with the Redomicile Merger, which have been and will continue to be expensed as incurred. The substantial majority of these costs will be incurred regardless of whether the Redomicile Merger is completed and prior to your vote on the proposal. We expect to incur costs and expenses, including professional fees, to comply with the Cayman Islands corporate and other laws. In addition, we expect to incur attorneys’ fees, accountants’ fees, filing fees, mailing expenses, solicitation fees and financial printing expenses in connection with the Redomicile Merger, even if the Redomicile Merger is not approved or completed. The Redomicile Merger also may negatively affect us by diverting attention of our management and employees from our operating business during the period of implementation and by increasing other administrative costs and expenses.

Our Board of Directors may choose to defer or abandon the Redomicile Merger.

Completion of the Redomicile Merger may be deferred or abandoned, at any time, by action of our board of directors, whether before or after the deadline to submit consents. While we currently expect the Redomicile Merger to take place promptly after the proposal to adopt the Redomicile Merger agreement is approved, our board of directors may defer completion or may abandon the Redomicile Merger because of, among other reasons, changes in existing or proposed laws, our determination that the Redomicile Merger would involve tax

19

Table of Contents

or other risks that outweigh their benefits, our determination that the level of expected benefits associated with the Redomicile Merger would otherwise be reduced, a dispute with the taxation authorities over the Redomicile Merger (or certain aspects thereof), an unexpected increase in the cost to complete the Redomicile Merger or any other determination by our board of directors that the Redomicile Merger would not be in the best interests of the Company or its shareholders or that the Redomicile Merger would have material adverse consequences to the Company or its shareholders.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We conduct our business in diverse locations around the world and are subject to economic, regulatory, social and political risks internationally and in the regions where we operate.

We currently conduct our business operations in China, the U.S., Japan, the U.K., Panama, Greece and Italy, and as of March 31, 2015, we owned and operated 50.9 MW of solar projects and have 96.8 MW of solar projects under construction across these jurisdictions. We also provide EPC services in China and the U.S. Our business is therefore subject to diverse and constantly changing economic, regulatory, social and political conditions in these jurisdictions.

Operating internationally exposes us to a number of risks globally and in each of the jurisdictions where we operate, including, without limitation:

20

Table of Contents

If economic recovery is slow in the markets where we operate, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, as we expand into additional markets, we may face unfamiliar regulatory regimes, business practices, governmental policies and industry conditions. As a result, our experience and knowledge of our existing markets may not be applicable to new markets that we enter, requiring significant time and resources to adapt our business to these unfamiliar markets. To the extent that our diverse business operations are affected by unexpected and adverse economic, regulatory, social and political conditions, we may experience business disruptions, loss of assets and personnel and other indirect losses and our business, financial condition and results of operations both locally and internationally could be materially and adversely affected.

The reduction, modification, delay or discontinuation of government subsidies and other economic incentives for the solar industry may reduce the profitability of our solar projects and materially adversely affect our business.

At present, solar power is not cost competitive with other energy sources in our existing markets and the new markets we plan to expand into. For a variety of technological and economic reasons, the cost of generating electricity from solar energy in these markets currently exceeds and, absent significant changes in technological or economic circumstances, will continue to exceed the cost of generating electricity from conventional and certain other competing energy sources. Therefore, government subsidies and incentives, primarily in the form of feed-in tariffs, or FIT, price support schemes, tax credits, net metering and other incentives to end users, distributors, system integrators and manufacturers of solar products are generally required to enable companies such as us to successfully operate in these markets.

Government subsidies and incentives vary by geographic market. The availability and size of such subsidies and incentives depend, to a large extent, on political and policy developments relating to environmental concerns and other macro-economic factors. These government subsidies and incentives are expected to gradually decrease in scope or be discontinued as solar power technology improves and becomes more affordable relative to other types of energy. Reductions have occurred in certain countries where we have operations, such as Greece, and subsidies and incentives may be further reduced or discontinued in Greece or other countries where we currently or intend to operate. Reductions may apply retroactively to existing solar projects, which could significantly reduce the value of our existing solar projects and other businesses. Even if reductions in government subsidies and economic incentives apply only to future solar projects, our operations in that country could be materially and adversely affected as we would not be able to leverage our existing presence to drive further growth. Moreover, certain solar subsidies and incentives are designed to expire or decline over time, are limited in total funding, require renewal from regulatory authorities or impose certain investment or performance criteria on our business partners or us, which we may not be able to satisfy. In addition, we may not be able to upgrade our technologies rapidly enough to compensate for foreseeable reductions in government subsidies and incentives. As a result, a significant reduction in the scope or discontinuation of government incentive programs in our existing and target markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Recent changes to our business strategy provide a limited history on which to base our prospects and anticipated results of operations. Our historical operating results may not serve as an adequate basis to evaluate our future prospects and results of operations.

Prior to 2014, we were primarily engaged in providing EPC services to developers of solar projects in the U.S. We have since 2014 expanded our EPC service business to China and commenced our global project

21

Table of Contents

development business under our independent power producer model, or IPP model, or our build-and-transfer model, or BT model, by ramping up our portfolio of solar projects. This limited operating history of developing and operating solar projects under our IPP and BT model may not be a reliable indicator of our future performance.

Given our limited operating history under the current business model, we may not be able to ascertain and allocate the appropriate financial and human resources necessary to grow these new business areas. We may invest considerable capital into growing these businesses but fail to address market or customer demands or otherwise fail to achieve satisfactory financial return. In particular, our results of operations, financial condition and future success depend largely on our ability to continue to identify suitable projects that complement our solar project pipeline through acquisitions and secondary development, as well as our ability to obtain the required regulatory approvals, financing and cost-effective construction services for these acquisitions. We must also sustainably manage and operate the solar projects that we acquire, develop and hold under our IPP model, or successfully identify buyers for solar projects under our BT model. In addition, in expanding into these new business areas, we may be competing against companies that previously have not been our significant competitors, such as companies that have substantially more experience than we do with respect to solar projects under our IPP and BT models. If we are unable to achieve growth in these new business areas, our overall growth and financial performance may be limited relative to our competitors and our operating results could be adversely impacted.

In addition, in early 2015, Solar Energy E-Commerce (Shanghai) Limited, or Solar Energy E-Commerce, launched the e-commerce and investment platform, www.solarbao.com and its sister version, www.solabao.com.hk, enabling retail customers and solar project developers to purchase various PV-related products and services. Our PRC subsidiary, Yan Hua Internet Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., or Yan Hua Internet, has entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Solar Energy E-Commerce and its shareholders. We expect Solar Energy E-Commerce to be our PRC variable interest entity and consolidate its financial results in our financial statements once the enforceability of these contractual arrangements is established.

Given its short operating history, it may be difficult to evaluate the performance and prospects of the e-commerce and investment business platform, and our ability to generate substantial revenue from the e-commerce and investment business remains unproven. There are also a number of risks related to the e-commerce and investment business, for example, its operations may be materially and adversely affected if it fails to adopt new technologies or adapt to changing user requirements or emerging industry standards.

Due to the change in our strategic focus and revenue generating efforts since 2014, our prior operating history and historical operating results may not provide a meaningful basis for evaluating our business, financial performance and prospects. Period-to-period comparisons of our operating results and our results of operations for any period should not be relied upon as an indication of our performance for any future period. We have incurred net losses since our inception and as of December 31, 2014, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $61.3 million. We may not be able to achieve or maintain profitability in the future.

We may not be able to acquire additional solar projects to grow our project portfolio, or effectively integrate or realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions.

Our current business strategy includes plans to further increase the number of solar projects we own and operate. Since 2014, we have significantly expanded our operations through acquisitions of solar projects across different development stages in China, Japan, the U.S., the U.K., Panama, Greece and Italy, and we may acquire additional businesses, products or technologies or enter into joint ventures or other strategic initiatives in the future. Accordingly, our ability to execute our expansion strategies depend on our ability to identify suitable investment or acquisition opportunities, which are subject to numerous uncertainties. We may not be able to identify favorable geographical markets for expansion or assess local demand for solar power, identify a

22

Table of Contents

sufficient number of projects as contemplated, or secure project financing and refinancing on reasonable terms for the contemplated acquisitions. In addition, our competitors may have substantially greater capital and other resources than we do, and may be able to pay more for an acquisition and may be able to identify, evaluate, bid for and acquire a greater number of projects than our resources permit.

Furthermore, we may not realize the anticipated benefits of our acquisitions and each transaction involves numerous risks, including, among others:

Acquisitions of companies are inherently risky, and ultimately, if we do not generate expected economic returns from the acquired businesses, or become responsible for any preexisting liabilities related to the acquired businesses, we may not fully realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our results of operations may be subject to fluctuations.

Historically, we have primarily generated revenue from the provision of EPC services. Before we achieve economies of scale in terms of our IPP projects and receive steady electricity generation income, our revenue in a given period will depend on the solar projects we provide EPC services to, or the number of solar projects sold under our BT model, and therefore subject to significant fluctuations. For instance, we may generate a significant portion of our revenues from the one-time sale of solar projects for certain periods. Moreover, certain aspects of our operations will also be subject to seasonal variations. For example, we may schedule significant construction activities to connect solar projects to the grids prior to a scheduled decrease in FIT rates in order to qualify for more favorable FIT policies.

To the extent that we continue to develop, build and sell solar projects while we are ramping up our IPP projects, we may be exposed to similar risks going forward.

23

Table of Contents

Failure to manage our evolving business could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

We intend to expand our business significantly within our existing markets and in a number of selected new locations in the future. We also intend to significantly expand our global project development business in the future. As our operations evolve, we expect to encounter additional challenges to our internal management, construction contracting management, investment and acquisition management, project management, project funding infrastructure and financing capabilities. Our existing operations, personnel, systems and internal control may not be adequate to support our business expansion and may require additional unanticipated investments in our internal management infrastructure. To manage the future growth of our operations, we will be required to improve our administrative, operational and financial systems, procedures and controls, and maintain, expand, train and manage a growing number of employees. In additional, we will need to hire and train additional project development personnel to manage our growing portfolio of IPP and BT projects. If we are unable to manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to take advantage of market opportunities, execute our business strategies successfully or respond to competitive pressures. As a result, our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We act as the general contractor for our customers for the provision of EPC services, and are subject to risks associated with construction, delays and other contingencies, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and results of operations.

Historically, we have primarily generated revenue from the provision of EPC services. We generally enter into fixed-price EPC contracts under which we act as the general contractor for our customers in connection with the installation of their solar power systems. All essential costs are estimated at the time of entering into the EPC contracts for a particular project, and are reflected in the overall fixed-price that we charge our customers. These cost estimates are preliminary and may or may not be covered by contracts between us or our subcontractors, suppliers or other parties to the project. In addition, we engage qualified and licensed subcontractors for the construction of our EPC projects. Shortages of such skilled labor could significantly delay a project or otherwise increase our costs. Should miscalculations in project planning or delay in execution occur (including those due to unexpected increases in inflation, commodity prices or labor costs), we may not be able to achieve our expected margins or recover our costs.

In addition, our EPC contracts generally provide for specified performance milestones. Delays in supply of PV module or components, construction delays, unexpected performance problems in electricity generation or other events may cause us to fail to meet these performance criteria, resulting in unanticipated and severe revenue and earnings losses and financial penalties. If we are unable to complete the development of a solar project, or fail to meet one or more agreed target construction milestone dates, any agreed upon system-level capacity or energy output guarantees or warranties (including, for some projects, twenty-five year performance warranties) or other terms under our EPC contracts, or the solar projects we develop cause grid interference or other damage, we may be subject to termination of such contracts or significant damages, penalties and/or other obligation under the EPC agreements or other agreements relating to the projects (including obligations to repair, replace and/or supplement additional modules and balance of system materials for the projects), particularly if our liabilities are not capped under the terms of such agreements, and we may not be able to recover our investment in the project. The occurrence of any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and results of operations.

We generally recognize revenue from EPC services on a “percentage of completion” basis and payments are due upon the achievement of contractual milestones and any delay or cancellation of a project could adversely affect our business.

We generally recognize revenue from our EPC services on a “percentage of completion” basis, and as a result, revenues from our EPC services are driven by the performance of our contractual obligations, which is in

24

Table of Contents

turn generally driven by timelines of the installation of solar power systems at customer sites. Such arrangement could result in unpredictability of revenue and in the near term, a revenue decrease. As with any project-related business, there is potential for delays within any particular customer project. Variation of project timelines and estimates may impact our ability to recognize revenue in a particular period. In addition, certain EPC contracts may provide for payment milestones due at specified stages throughout the development of a project. Because we must invest substantially in a project in advance of achieving these milestones and receiving payments, delay or cancellation of the project could adversely affect our business and results of operations.

We may fail to comply with laws and regulations in the markets we operate.

The development, construction and operation of solar projects are highly regulated. We conduct our operations in many jurisdictions and are subject to different laws and regulations, including national and local regulations relating to building codes, taxes, safety, environmental protection, utility interconnection, metering and other matters. We also establish subsidiaries with operations in these countries and jurisdictions which are required to comply with various local laws and regulations. While we strive to work with our local counsel and other advisers to comply with the laws and regulations of each jurisdiction where we operate, there have been, and may continue to be, instances of non-compliances such as late filings of annual accounts with the appropriate governmental authorities, failure to notify governmental authorities of certain transactions, failure to hold annual meetings as required, failure to register director or address changes or other local requirements which may result in fines, sanctions or other penalties against our non-complying subsidiaries and its directors and officers. While we do not believe our past and continuing non-compliances, singularly or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, we cannot assure you that similar or other non-compliances will not occur in the future which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

We are responsible for obtaining a variety of approvals, permits and licenses from various authorities for our solar projects. The procedures for obtaining such approvals, permits and licenses vary from country to country, making it onerous and costly to adhere to the varying requirements and standards of individual localities. Failure to obtain the required approvals, permits or licenses or to comply with the conditions associated therewith may result in fines, sanctions, suspension, revocation or non-renewal of approvals, permits or licenses, or even criminal liabilities, which could material and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, new government regulations pertaining to our business or solar projects may result in significant additional expenses. We cannot assure you that we will be able to promptly and adequately respond to changes of laws and regulations in various jurisdictions, or that our employees and contractors will act in accordance with our internal policies and procedures. Failure to comply with laws and regulations where we develop, own and operate solar projects may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The market demand for solar power is strongly influenced by government regulations and policies concerning the electric utility industry as well as policies promulgated by electric utilities in each of the markets we operate. These regulations and policies often relate to electricity pricing and technical interconnection of electricity generation. Customer purchases of alternative energy sources, including solar power technology, could be deterred by these regulations and policies, which may significantly reduce the demand for our PV solutions. For example, without a regulatory-mandated exception for solar power systems, utility customers are often charged interconnection or standby fees for putting distributed power generation on the electric utility grid. These fees could increase, rendering solar power less cost competitive in these markets and our PV solutions less desirable.

It is difficult to ensure ongoing compliance with the changing requirements of individual markets. Any new government regulations or utility policies pertaining to solar projects may result in significant additional expenses to us or other industry participants and as a result could cause a significant reduction in demand for our PV solutions.

25

Table of Contents

The solar industry competes with both conventional power industries and other renewable power industries.

The solar industry faces intense competition from all other players within the energy industry, including both conventional energy providers such as nuclear, natural gas and fossil fuels as well as other renewable energy providers, including geothermal, hydropower, biomass, wind, nuclear energy, natural gas and other fossil fuels. Other energy sources may benefit from innovations that reduce costs, increase safety or otherwise improve their competitiveness. New natural resources may be discovered, or global economic, business or political developments may disproportionately benefit conventional energy sources or other renewable energy sources at the expense of solar. Governments may strengthen their support for other renewable energy sources and reduce their support for the solar industry. For instance, the recent decline in oil prices has adversely impacted the competitiveness of solar energy. Failure for our customers, other business partners or us to compete with the providers of other energy sources may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The market for solar project development is highly competitive.

There is currently intense competition in the solar industry, particularly in the downstream project development segment. Solar projects encounter competition from utilities, industrial companies and other independent power producers. In recent years, there has been increasing competition for the award of PPAs, which has in some markets resulted in an excess supply above designated reserve margins and has been a contributing factor in the declining electricity prices in many markets. In light of these conditions, we may not be able to obtain PPAs for our new solar projects under our IPP model, and we may not be able to renew PPAs on the same terms and conditions upon expiration, particularly in terms of securing an electricity sale price that enables profitable operation or the sale of a project at anticipated value, if at all.

We have only recently expanded our business to include global project development and may not have the same level of expertise and customer base as our competitors, which may affect our ability to successfully establish our presence in this market. Our current or potential competitors may have greater operational, financial, technical, market share, scale, management or other resources than us in our existing or target markets. Our competitors may also enter into strategic alliances with other competitors to our detriment, or may ally with our suppliers or contractors, thereby limiting our procurement choices and our flexibility in project development. Our current or potential competitors may offer PV solutions comparable or superior to ours at the same or lower prices, or adapt more quickly to industry trends than we do. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced profit margins and loss of market share.

Technological advances in the solar industry could render our PV solutions uncompetitive or obsolete.

The solar industry is characterized by its rapid adoption and application of technological advances. This requires us to develop new PV solutions and enhance our existing PV solutions to keep pace with and respond effectively to evolving technologies, market conditions and customer demands. Our competitors may develop technologies more advanced and cost-effective than ours. We will need to invest substantially in research and development to maintain our market position and effectively compete in the future. Our failure to further refine or enhance our technologies could render our technologies uncompetitive or obsolete, which could reduce our market share and cause our revenues to decline.

In addition, we may invest in and implement newly-developed, less-proven technologies in our project development or in maintaining or enhancing our existing projects. There is no guarantee that these new technologies will perform or generate customer demand as anticipated. The failure of our new technologies to perform as anticipated may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

26

Table of Contents

If sufficient demand for solar projects develops slower than we anticipate, develops in ways inconsistent with our strategy, or fails to develop at all, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

The solar power market worldwide is at a relatively early stage of development compared to conventional power markets and other renewable power markets, such as that for hydropower. Thus, trends in the solar industry are based only on limited data and may be unreliable. Many factors may affect the demand for solar projects worldwide, including:

Our analysis and predictions concerning the future growth of the solar industry are based on complex facts and circumstances and may be incorrect. If market demand for solar projects in our existing or target markets fails to develop according to our expectations, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We require a significant amount of cash to meet our capital requirements and fund our operations, including payments to suppliers for PV modules and components and to contractors for EPC services. As of December 31, 2014, we had $47.5 million in outstanding short-term borrowings (including the current portion of long-term bank borrowings) and no outstanding long-term bank borrowings (excluding the current portion).

Our existing debt may have significant consequences on our operations, including:

Any of these factors and other consequences that may result from our substantial indebtedness could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations as well as our ability to meet our payment obligations under our existing debt facilities. Our ability to meet our payment obligations under our

27

Table of Contents

existing debt facilities depends on our ability to generate significant cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our control.

Our business requires significant financial resources. If we do not effectively manage our cash and other liquid financial assets and execute our liquidity plan, we may not be able to continue as a going concern.

We incurred net losses of $32.2 million and $5.2 million in 2013 and 2014, respectively. We incurred cash flow from operations of $11.2 million in 2013 and negative cash flow from operations of $56.5 million in 2014. Historically, we have primarily relied on cash from our operations, bank borrowings, private placements and financial leases to fund our operations.

Our management reviews our forecasted cash flows on an ongoing basis to ensure that we will have sufficient capital from a combination of cash flow from operations and proceeds from financing activities, if required, in order to fund our working capital and capital expenditures. We expect that our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated working capital requirements and capital expenditure for at least the next 12 months - but generally inadequate to pursue new project acquisition or development initiatives without additional capital. The timing and amount of our working capital and capital expenditure requirements may vary significantly depending on numerous factors, such as the timeliness of payments from our customers. We have filed liens to secure customer payments for each of our solar projects, but there is no assurance that such payments will be timely collected. Without access to sufficient level of capital from operations or through bank borrowings or other sources, we may not be able to execute our growth strategy or pursue additional projects, or may not be able to continue as a going concern, which could adversely affect our results of operations and impair our long-term growth.

Our growth prospects and future profitability and our ability to continue to acquire solar projects depends on the availability of sufficient financing on terms acceptable to us.

The development of solar projects requires significant up-front cash investments, including the costs of permit development, construction and associated operations. Since 2014, we have been expanding our solar project portfolio primarily by acquiring solar projects across different development stages. Such expansion strategy requires significant upfront capital expenditures which, depending on the respective development stages of the acquired projects, may not be recouped for a significant period of time. As a result, we are required to pursue a wide variety of capital resources to fund our operations, including private placements, bank loans, financial leases and other third-party financing options.

Our ability to obtain sufficient financing is subject to a number of uncertainties, including:

Due to these or other reasons, we may not be successful in obtaining the required funds for project acquisition. Furthermore, we may be unable to refinance our bank borrowings on favorable terms, or at all, upon the expiration or termination of our existing loan facilities. In addition, rising interest rates could adversely affect our ability to secure financing on favorable terms. Our failure in securing suitable financing sources in a timely

28

Table of Contents

manner or at all, or on commercially acceptable terms, could significantly limit our ability to execute our growth strategies or future acquisitions, and may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

An increase in interest rates or lending rates or tightening of the supply of capital in the global financial market could make it difficult for our customers to finance the cost of EPC services or solar projects and could reduce the demand of our PV solutions.

Many of our customers depend on debt and/or equity financing to fund the initial capital expenditure required to develop, build and/or purchase solar projects. These structured finance arrangements are complex and rely heavily on the creditworthiness of the customer as well as required returns of the financial institutions. Depending on the status of financial markets and overall economic conditions, financial institutions may be unwilling or unable to provide financing to our customers, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to maintain or grow our revenues. In addition, an increase in interest rates or lending rates, or a reduction in the supply of debt financing or tax equity investments, could reduce the number of solar projects that receive financing or otherwise make it difficult for our customers to secure the financing necessary to develop, build or purchase a solar project on favorable terms, or at all, and thus lower demand for our PV solutions, which could limit our growth or reduce our net sales.

The significant period of time between our upfront investments in solar projects and their commencement of revenue generation could materially and adversely affect our liquidity, business and results of operations.

We have since 2014 commenced our global project development business under our IPP or BT models by ramping up our portfolio of solar projects. Months or even years may pass between the time that we make significant upfront investments in the solar projects and the time that we commence to receive revenue from the electricity generated by these solar projects after grid connection (under our IPP model) or from the sale of these projects (under our BT model). These upfront investments include, among others, legal, accounting and other professional fees, costs associated with feasibility studies and due diligence, payments for land use rights, construction costs, government permits and deposits for grid connection agreements and PPAs, all of which may not be refundable if a project fails to achieve completion. We have historically relied on private placements, bank loans and financial leases to cover costs and expenses incurred during project development.

In particular, there could be an especially long gap between the initial assessment of a project, the first steps of acquiring land use rights and negotiating interconnection agreements and the obtaining of governmental approvals for construction. Acquisition of land use rights can be particularly time-consuming if we are engaged in primary development and need to negotiate with land owners or government entities. The significant length of time it takes to develop solar projects increases the risk for adverse events to occur during such process, whether they be economic, environmental, political, social or otherwise, that could cause further delays in project development or increase the overall development costs. Such adverse developments or unanticipated delays could render us unable to recoup our initial investment in the solar projects, and materially and adversely affect our liquidity, profitability and results of operations.

We may encounter unexpected difficulties when developing solar power projects.

In 2014, we commenced our global project development business by ramping up our portfolio of solar projects under both our IPP and BT models. The attributable capacity of our projects in operation and projects under construction increased from nil as of December 31, 2013 to 50.9 MW and 96.8 MW as of March 31, 2015, respectively. In addition, we had an aggregate of 2,614.6 MW of projects in announced pipeline as of March 31, 2015. See “Solar Power, Inc.—Our Global Project Development Business.” The development of solar projects involve numerous risks and uncertainties and require extensive research, planning and due diligence. Before we can determine whether a solar project is economically, technologically or otherwise feasible, we may be required

29

Table of Contents

to incur significant capital expenditure for land and interconnection rights, preliminary engineering, permitting, legal and other work. Success in developing a particular solar project is contingent upon, among others:

Successful completion of a particular solar project may be adversely affected by numerous factors, including, without limitation:

Accordingly, some of the solar projects in our portfolio may not eventually commence operation and connect to the grid, or even proceed to construction. If a number of our solar projects are not completed, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our construction activities may be subject to cost overruns or delays.

We engage third-party contractors for the construction of solar projects. Construction of solar projects involves numerous risks and uncertainties, and may be adversely affected by circumstances outside of our control, including seasonal changes, inclement weather, failure to receive regulatory approvals on schedule or third-party delays in supplying PV modules or other materials. We may not be able to negotiate satisfactory construction agreements with third-party contractors, or our third-party contractors may not be able to contract with their subcontractors on a timely basis. In addition, if our contractors fail to adhere to our quality standards or otherwise fail to meet their contractual obligations to us, or if there is a shortage of contractors or labor strikes that prevents our contractors from completing their construction work on schedule or within budget, the solar projects may experience significant delays or cost overruns. Increases in the prices of solar products and components may also increase our procurement costs. Labor shortages, work stoppages and labor disputes could

30

Table of Contents

significantly delay a project or otherwise increase our costs. In addition, delays in obtaining or failure to obtain required construction permits could also delay or hinder the construction of our solar projects. A lack of proper construction permits or post-construction approvals could delay or prevent our solar projects from commencing operation and connecting to the relevant grid.

We may not be able to recover any of our losses resulting from construction cost overruns or delays. In addition, since the FIT applicable to a solar project generally depends on its lead time to grid connection, construction and connection delays may lead to a lower-than-expected FIT, which would adversely affect the long-term value and potentially the viability of the project. Many PPAs also require our solar projects to connect to the grid by a certain date. If the construction of solar project is significantly delayed, we may be in violation of our PPAs or may only be entitled to reduced FIT payments, if at all. A reduction or forfeiture of FIT payments would materially and adversely affect the financial results and results of operations for a solar power project. Any of the above contingencies could lead to our failure to generate expected return from our solar projects and result in unanticipated and significant revenue and earnings losses.

We rely on third-party suppliers and contractors when developing our solar power projects.

We source PV modules and other balance-of-system components from a wide selection of third-party suppliers and LDK and engage third-party contractors for the construction of solar projects. We typically enter into contracts with our suppliers and contractors on a project-by-project basis and do not maintain long-term contracts with our suppliers or contractors. Therefore, we are generally exposed to price fluctuations and availability of PV modules and balance-of-system components sourced from our suppliers and construction services procured from our contractors. For example, in light of changing market dynamics and government policies, the price and availability of PV modules have been subject to significant volatility in recent years. Increases in the prices of PV modules or balance-of-system components, decreases in their availability, fluctuations in construction, labor and installation costs, or changes in the terms of our relationship with our suppliers and contractors may increase the cost of procuring equipment and engaging contractors and hence materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, the delivery of defective products or products or construction services by our suppliers or contractors which are otherwise not in compliance with contract specifications, or the late supply of products or construction services, may cause construction delays or solar power projects that fail to adhere to our quality and safety standards, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flow.

Warranties provided by our suppliers and contractors may be limited or insufficient to compensate our losses, or may not cover the nature of our losses incurred.

We expect to benefit from various warranties, including product quality and performance warranties, provided by our suppliers and contractors. These suppliers and contractors, however, may file for bankruptcy, cease operations or otherwise become unable or unwilling to fulfill their warranty obligations. Even if a supplier fulfills its warranty obligations, the warranty may not be sufficient to compensate us for all of our losses. In addition, the warranty period of inverters and transformers generally expire within 5 to 10 years after the date such equipment is delivered or commissioned and are subject to liability limits. Where damages are caused by defective products provided by our suppliers or construction services delivered by our contractors, our suppliers or contractors may be unable or unwilling to perform their warranty obligations as a result of their financial condition or otherwise, or if the warranty period has expired or a liability limit has been reached, there may be a reduction or loss of warranty protection for the affected projects, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our solar projects may not perform up to our expectations.

The projects in our solar project portfolio are relatively new with expected operating lives of more than 20 years. The majority of our projects in operation as of March 31, 2015 had commenced operations within the

31

Table of Contents

last 6 to 12 months. In addition, the projects we acquire in the future may not have commenced construction or operation or otherwise have a limited operating history. As a result, our assumptions and estimates regarding the future performance of these projects are, and will be, made without the benefit of a meaningful operating history, which may impair our ability to accurately assess the potential profitability of the projects. The performance of these projects will also be subject to risks inherent in newly constructed renewable energy projects, including breakdowns and outages, latent defects, equipment that performs below our expectations and system failures. Failure of some or all of our projects to perform up to our expectations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to obtain long-term contracts for the sale of electricity generated by our solar projects under our IPP model at prices and on other terms favorable to attract financing and other investments.

Since 2014, we started acquiring solar projects across different stages of development globally and to hold some of these acquired projects under our IPP model. Obtaining long-term contracts for the sale of electricity generated by our solar projects under our IPP model at prices and on other terms favorable to us will be essential for obtaining financing or completing construction of these projects. We must compete for PPAs against other developers of solar and renewable energy projects. Furthermore, other sources of power, such as natural gas-fired power plants, have historically been cheaper than the cost of solar power and power from certain types of projects, such as natural gas-fired power plants, can be delivered on a firm basis. The availability of PPAs is subject to a number of economic, regulatory, tax and public policy factors. The inability to compete successfully against other power producers or otherwise enter into PPAs favorable to us would negatively affect our ability to develop and finance our projects and negatively impact our revenue.

We may be subject to unforeseen costs, liabilities or obligations when providing O&M services.

We provide ongoing O&M services to third-party solar projects under fixed-price long-term service agreements, pursuant to which we generally perform all scheduled and unscheduled maintenance and operating and other asset management services for the system. Our costs to perform these services are estimated at the time of entering into the O&M agreement for a particular project, and these are reflected in the fixed-price that we charge our customers under the O&M agreement. Should miscalculations in estimating these costs occur (including those due to unexpected increases in inflation or labor costs), our O&M services may not be profitable and our growth strategy and results of operations could be adversely affected. Because of the long-term nature of these O&M agreements, the adverse impacts on results of operations could be significant, particularly if our liabilities are not capped or subject to an above-market liability cap under the terms of the O&M agreement. In addition, we may be subject to substantial costs, liabilities or obligations in the event that the solar projects we maintain and operate do not meet any agreed-upon system-level availability or performance warranties.

We have limited insurance coverage.

Our insurance policies cover employee-related accidents and injuries, property damage, machinery breakdowns, fixed assets, facilities and liability deriving from our activities, including environmental liability. We consider our current insurance coverage to be adequate, but we cannot assure you that our insurance will be sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which we may be subject. Furthermore, our insurance coverage is subject to deductibles, caps, exclusions and other limitations. A loss for which we are not fully insured could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Furthermore, due to rising insurance costs and changes in the insurance markets, we cannot assure you that our insurance coverage will continue to be available at comparable rates or on similar terms, if at all. We may also reduce or cancel our insurance coverage at any time. We may not be able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount we desire at reasonable rates and we may elect to self-insure a portion of our solar project portfolio. Any losses not covered by insurance could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

32

Table of Contents

In addition, the insurance industry in many parts of the world is still in an early stage of development. As we continue to expand our global presence, we cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage in each of the new markets we enter. To the extent that our operations are not adequately insured in these markets, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We may be the subject of product or strict liability claims if the provision of our EPC services or the solar projects we sell result in injury or damage, and we have limited insurance coverage to protect against such claims, as well as losses that may result from business interruptions or natural disasters.

Solar projects are highly sophisticated and generate and transfer large volumes of electric charge with the potential to harm or kill, whether by improper installation or other causes. We are therefore exposed to an inherent risk of product liability claims or class action suits in the event that the installation of the solar power systems during the provision of our EPC services, or the solar projects we sell under our BT model, results in injury or damage, and we may even be liable in some jurisdictions under a strict liability theory, where liability holds even if we are not at fault. Moreover, to the extent that a claim is brought against us, we may not have adequate resources to defend ourselves. We rely on our general liability insurance to cover product liability and other liability claims and have not separately obtained product liability insurance. The successful assertion of product or strict liability claims against us could result in significant monetary damages and, if our insurance coverage is inadequate, require us to make significant payments which could have a materially adverse effect on our financial results. Any such business disruption could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources.

Solar energy generation depends heavily on suitable meteorological conditions. If weather conditions are unfavorable, our power generation output, and therefore the revenue from our solar projects, may be substantially below our expectations.

The electricity produced and revenues generated by solar projects are highly dependent on suitable solar conditions and associated weather conditions. Such conditions are beyond our control. Furthermore, components of these generation systems, including solar panels and inverters, can be damaged by severe weather, such as heavy snowstorms, hailstorms, ice storms, lightning strikes, extreme winds, earthquakes or tornadoes. Replacement and spare parts for key components may be difficult or costly to acquire or may be unavailable. Unfavorable weather and atmospheric conditions could reduce the output of our solar projects below projected generation, damage or impair the effectiveness of our projects or require shutdown of key equipment, impeding operation of our projects and our ability to achieve forecasted revenues and cash flows.

The amount of electricity solar projects produce is dependent in part on the amount of sunlight, or insolation, where the projects are located. Because shorter daylight hours in winter months results in less insolation, the generation of particular projects will vary depending on the season.

We base our investment decisions with respect to solar power generation assets on the findings of related solar studies conducted prior to construction or based on historical conditions at existing projects. However, actual climatic conditions at an asset site may not conform to the findings of these studies and, therefore, our solar projects may not meet anticipated production levels or the rated capacity of our projects, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The operation of solar projects involves significant inherent risks and hazards that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

The operation of solar projects involves numerous hazardous activities, including delivering electricity to transmission and distribution systems. We are subject to natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, snow obscuration, high temperatures, lightning, hurricanes, long-term climate changes, volcanoes and wind risks, as well as other inherent risks affecting resource availability such as fire, explosion, soil and ice buildup, structural

33

Table of Contents

collapse and equipment failure. Moreover, we may suffer from negligent acts by our PPA counterparties or other third parties. Our roof-top projects could cause damage to the building roof, resulting in claims due to water damages or replacement of roofing materials. These and other hazards can cause significant personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to, and destruction of, property and equipment and contamination of, or damage to, the environment, wildlife takes or fatalities and suspension of operations. The occurrence of any of these events may result in lawsuits against us asserting claims for substantial damages, including for environmental cleanup costs, personal injury and property damage and fines and/or penalties.

In addition, the ongoing operation of solar projects face risks that include the breakdown or failure of equipment or processes or performance below expected levels of output or efficiency due to wear and tear, latent defect, design error or operator error or force majeure events, among others. Unplanned outages, including extensions of scheduled outages, occur from time to time and are an inherent risk of our business. Unplanned outages typically increase our operation and maintenance expenses and may reduce our revenues as a result of generating and selling less electricity.

If we fail to properly operate and maintain our solar projects, these projects may experience decreased performance, shortened operating life or shut downs. Our solar projects may also require periodic upgrading and improvement. Through changes in our own operation or local conditions, the costs of operating the project may increase, including costs related to labor, equipment, insurance and taxes. If we cause damage to third parties, we may become liable for the consequences of any resulting damage. We may also experience equipment malfunction or failure, leading to unexpected maintenance needs, unplanned outages or other operational issues. In addition, inconsistencies in the quality of solar panels, PV modules, balance-of-system components or maintenance services for our solar projects may affect the system efficiency of our projects.

Any unexpected operational or mechanical failure, including failure associated with breakdowns and forced outages, and any decreased operational or management performance, could reduce our solar projects’ power generating capacity below expected levels, reducing our revenues and profitability. Degradation of the performance of our solar projects above levels provided for in the relevant PPAs may also reduce our revenues. Unanticipated capital expenditures associated with maintaining, upgrading or repairing our projects may also reduce our profitability. In addition, damage to our reputation due to system failure or accidents could negatively impact our relationships with customers and local government authorities, which could also materially adversely affect our business. Negative public or community response to solar energy projects could adversely affect the approval for and construction of our projects. We maintain insurance coverage that we consider adequate but we cannot assure you that our insurance will be sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which we may be subject.

Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations subject us to extensive and increasingly stringent operational requirements, as well as potentially substantial liabilities arising out of environmental contamination.

We are subject to, in each of the jurisdictions we operate, numerous national and local laws, regulations, guidelines, policies, directives and other requirements governing or relating to, among others, land use and zoning matters and protection of human health and the environment, including those limiting the discharge and release of pollutants into the environment, and the protection of certain wildlife. These laws and regulations require our solar projects to, among others, obtain and maintain approvals and permits, undergo environmental impact assessments and review processes and implement environmental, health and safety programs and procedures to control risks associated with the construction, operation and decommissioning of solar projects. If our solar projects do not comply with applicable environmental laws, regulations or permit requirements, we may be required to pay significant fines or penalties or suspend or cease operations of the affected projects. Violations of environmental and other laws, regulations and permit requirements may also result in criminal sanctions or injunctions.

34

Table of Contents

Our solar projects may experience malfunctions and other unplanned events that result in personal injury and property damage. As such, the operation of our projects carries an inherent risk of environmental, health and safety liabilities (including potential civil actions, compliance or remediation orders, fines and other penalties), and may subject us to administrative and judicial proceedings. In addition, certain environmental laws and regulations may impose joint and several liability on past and present owners and operators of sites, related to the cleaning up of sites where hazardous wastes or materials were disposed or released.

We may continue to conduct acquisitions and enter into joint ventures, investments or other strategic alliances which may be unsuccessful.

We may continue to grow our operations through acquisitions, as well as joint ventures or other strategic alliances when appropriate opportunities arise. Such acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances may expose us to additional operational, regulatory, market and geographical risks as well as risks associated with additional capital requirements and diversion of management attention. In particular, any future strategic alliances may expose us to the following risks:

The materialization of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely substantially on our senior management team and our ability to attract, train and retain qualified personnel for our current and future success.

The industry experience, expertise and contributions of our chairman, Mr. Xiaofeng Peng, is essential to our continuing success. We will continue to rely on our senior management, regional management and other key employees to manage our business operations and implement our growth plans. If we were to lose the services of any of our senior or regional management personnel and were unable to recruit, train and retain personnel with comparable qualifications, our operations and growth could be adversely affected.

Our qualified and experienced project development teams are critical to our success. We may not be able to continue to attract, train and retain qualified personnel, including executive officers, project development personnel, project management personnel and other key personnel with the necessary experience and expertise. In particular, as we enter into new markets, we face challenges to recruit and retain qualified personnel who are familiar with local regulatory regimes and have adequate experiences in project development and operations.

There is substantial competition for qualified personnel in the downstream PV industry. Our competitors may offer more competitive packages or otherwise attract our personnel. Our costs to retain qualified personnel

35

Table of Contents

may also increase in response to competition. If we fail to continue to attract and retain a sufficient number of personnel with suitable managerial, technical or marketing expertise, our business operations could be adversely affected and our future growth and expansions may be inhibited.

The e-commerce and investment business platform has a short operating history and it may be difficult to evaluate its performance and prospects.

In early 2015, the e-commerce and investment platform, www.solarbao.com, primarily targeting retail customers residing in China, and its sister version targeting a global customer base, www.solarbao.com.hk, enabling retail customers or solar project developers to purchase various PV-related products and services, was launched by Solar Energy E-Commerce. Our PRC subsidiary, Yan Hua Internet, has entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Solar Energy E-Commerce and its shareholders. This platform is intended to create a global network connecting investors seeking solar industry investment opportunities and solar project developers around the world. This e-commerce and investment platform primarily generates revenue from commissions derived from the leasing of solar panels. If fewer transactions occur on this e-commerce and investment platform or our commission rates decrease, the commissions we receive would decrease. In addition, revenue from this e-commerce and investment platform may be affected by other factors, including increasing competition, slowing growth of the Chinese e-commerce industry, changes in government policies or general economic conditions.

Given its short operating history, our ability to generate substantial revenue from the e-commerce business remains unproven. The e-commerce and investment business has not been tested over time and we cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully manage or grow it. We may incur significant costs as we continue to maintain the e-commerce and investment platform. Given the limited operating history of the e-commerce and investment business, it may be difficult for you to evaluate its performance and prospects.

The online e-commerce and investment business may be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to adopt new technologies or adapt the e-commerce and investment platform to changing user requirements or emerging industry standards.

The e-commerce and investment platform, www.solarbao.com together with its sister version, www.solarbao.com.hk, requires continuous enhancement and improvement in responsiveness, functionality and features to remain competitive. Our investors’ and customers’ needs, requirements and preferences of financial products and offerings are constantly evolving. Our ability to effectively identify, develop, acquire and deliver the services suitable to our customers as well as our responsiveness to technological advances are crucial to the success of this e-commerce and investment platform.

The development of www.solarbao.com and www.solarbao.com.hk platform and other proprietary technologies involves significant investment and business risks. For example, we may not have sufficient financial resources to repurchase the PV modules from investors and may not be able to pay the specified rate of lease return to investors if the underlying DG projects are not successfully developed. In addition, we may be required to substantially modify or adapt this platform to the evolving Internet, networking or telecommunications technologies or other technological advances. We may not be able to utilize new technologies effectively or adapt our online platform to the evolving requirements of our customers or emerging industry standards. If we are unable to adapt to changing market conditions or user requirements in a timely and cost-effective manner, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights may undermine our competitive position, and litigation to protect our intellectual property rights may be costly.

We rely primarily on trade secrets, know-how and other proprietary information to protect our intellectual property. Nevertheless, these afford only limited protection and the actions we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not be adequate to provide us with meaningful protection or commercial advantage. Third parties may be able to use the technologies that we have developed and compete with us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our failure to protect our intellectual property and proprietary rights may undermine our competitive position. Third parties may infringe

36

Table of Contents

or misappropriate our proprietary technologies or other intellectual property and proprietary rights. Policing the unauthorized use of proprietary technology can be difficult and expensive. In particular, the laws and enforcement procedures of the PRC and certain other markets where we operate are uncertain or do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do the laws and enforcement procedures of the United States. We may need to resort to court proceedings to enforce our intellectual property rights in the future. Litigation relating to our intellectual property might result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention away from our business. An adverse determination in any such litigation will impair our intellectual property rights and adversely affect our business, prospects and reputation.

We may be exposed to infringement or misappropriation claims by third parties which, if determined adversely to us, could cause us to pay significant damage awards.

Our success depends largely on our ability to use and develop our technology and know-how without infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties. The validity and scope of claims relating to solar technology involve complex scientific, legal and factual questions and analysis and, therefore, may be highly uncertain. As we continue to expand internationally, we face a heightened risk of becoming the subject of claims for intellectual property infringement. We may be subject to litigation involving claims of patent infringement or violation of intellectual property rights of third parties. An adverse determination in any such litigation or proceedings against us could subject us to significant liabilities to third parties, including requiring us to seek licenses from third parties, to pay ongoing royalties or to pay monetary and punitive damages. Protracted litigation could also result in our customers or potential customers deferring or limiting their procurement of our PV solutions until resolution of such litigation, which could result in losses and adversely affect our reputation and results of operations.

Our management has identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. Additionally, our management may identify material weaknesses in the future that could adversely affect investor confidence, impair the value of our securities and increase our cost of raising capital.

Our management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, which relates to a lack of segregation of duties, and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure and internal controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2014. There can be no assurance as to how quickly or effectively we can remediate the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting or that additional material weaknesses will not be identified in the future.

Any failure to remediate additional weaknesses or deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that may be discovered in the future or to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in the implementation of such controls, could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our financial statements. Any such failure could, in turn, affect the future ability of our management to certify that our internal control over financial reporting is effective. Ineffective internal control over financial reporting could also subject us to the scrutiny of the SEC and other regulatory bodies which could cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and subject us to civil or criminal penalties or shareholder litigation, which could have an adverse effect on the trading price of our Shares.

In addition, if we identify additional deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting, the disclosure of that fact, even if quickly remedied, could reduce the market’s confidence in our financial statements and harm our share price. Furthermore, additional deficiencies could result in future non-compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”). Such non-compliance could subject us to a variety of administrative sanctions, including review by the SEC or other regulatory authorities.

37

Table of Contents

Our independent registered public accounting firm may be suspended from practicing before the SEC if they are unable to continue to satisfy SEC investigation requests in the future. If a delay in completion of our audit process occurs as a result, we could be unable to timely file certain reports with the SEC, which may lead to the delisting of our Shares.

On January 22, 2014, Judge Cameron Elliot, an SEC administrative law judge, issued an initial decision suspending the Chinese member firms of the “Big Four” accounting firms, including KPMG network from, among others things, practicing before the SEC for six months. On February 12, 2014, the accounting firms filed an appeal with the SEC regarding the administrative law judge’s decision. On February 6, 2015, the Chinese member firms of the “Big Four” accounting firms, including our independent registered accounting firm, reached settlement with the SEC. As part of the settlement, each of the Chinese member firms of “Big Four” accounting firms agreed to settlement terms that include a censure; undertakings to make a payment to the SEC; procedures and undertakings as to future requests for documents by the SEC; and possible additional proceedings and remedies should those undertakings not be adhered to.

If the settlement terms are not adhered to, Chinese member firms of “Big Four” accounting firms, including our independent registered public accounting firm, may be suspended from practicing before the SEC which could in turn delay the timely filing of our financial statements with the SEC. In addition, it could be difficult for us to timely identify and engage another qualified independent auditor to replace our independent registered public accounting firm. A delay in completion of the audit process could delay the timely filing of our quarterly or annual reports with the SEC. A delinquency in our filings with the SEC may result in OTCBB initiating delisting procedures, which could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operation and financial condition.

Our independent registered public accounting firm’s audit documentation related to their audit report included in in the consent solicitation statement/prospectus may include audit documentation located in China. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, or PCAOB, currently cannot inspect audit documentation located in China and, as such, you may be deprived of the benefits of such inspection.

Our independent registered public accounting firm issued an audit opinion on the financial statements included in this in the consent solicitation statement/prospectus filed with the SEC. As an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the U.S. and a firm registered with the PCAOB, our auditor is required by the laws of the U.S. to undergo regular inspections by the PCAOB. However, work papers located in China are not currently inspected by the PCAOB because the PCAOB is currently unable to conduct inspections without the approval of the Chinese authorities.

Inspections of certain other firms that the PCAOB has conducted outside of China have identified deficiencies in those firms’ audit procedures and quality control procedures, which may be addressed as part of the inspection process to improve future audit quality. However, the PCAOB is currently unable to inspect an auditor’s audit work related to a company’s operations in China and where such documentation of the audit work is located in China. As a result, our investors may be deprived of the benefits of PCAOB’s oversight of our auditors through such inspections.

The inability of the PCAOB to conduct inspections of our auditor’s work papers in China makes it more difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of our auditor’s audit procedures or quality control procedures as compared to auditors outside of China that are subject to PCAOB inspections. Investors may consequently lose confidence in our reported financial information and procedures and the quality of our financial statements.

38

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our International Operations

We are subject to risks associated with foreign currency exchange rates, fluctuations of which may negatively affect our revenue, cost of sales and gross margins and could result in exchange losses.

We currently operate in a number of jurisdictions including China, Japan, the U.K., Panama, Greece, the U.S. and Italy, and our local operations are generally conducted in the functional currency of the home jurisdiction. The FIT and other subsidies enjoyed by solar projects are also denominated in local currencies. Thus, we deal on a regular basis in several currencies concurrently, which expose us to significant currency exchange risks. Any increased costs or reduced revenue as a result of foreign exchange rate fluctuations could adversely affect our profit margins. The fluctuation of foreign exchange rates also affects the value of our monetary and other assets and liabilities denominated in local currencies. Generally, an appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the relevant local currencies could result in a foreign exchange loss for assets denominated in such local currencies and a foreign exchange gain for liabilities denominated in such local currencies. Conversely, a devaluation of the U.S. dollar against the relevant local currencies could result in a foreign exchange gain for assets denominated in such local currencies and a foreign exchange loss for liabilities denominated in such local currencies.

We may also expand into emerging markets, some of which may have an uncertain regulatory environment relating to currency policy. Conducting business in such emerging markets could increase our exposure to foreign exchange risks. Although we access a variety of financing solutions that are tailored to the geographic location of our projects and to local regulations, we have not entered into any hedging transactions to reduce the foreign exchange risks, but may do so in the future when appropriate. However, if we decide to hedge our foreign exchange exposure in the future, we cannot assure you that we will be able to reduce our foreign currency risk exposure in an effective manner, at reasonable costs, or at all.

Certain of our solar projects are located in China, and therefore we are subject to risks associated with the Chinese legal system which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We are a California corporation and our operations in China are subject to laws and regulations applicable to foreign investment in China and, in particular, laws applicable to wholly foreign owned companies. Since 1979, Chinese legislation and regulations have significantly enhanced the protections afforded to various forms of foreign investments in China. However, since these laws and regulations are relatively new and the Chinese legal system continues to rapidly evolve, the interpretations of many laws, regulations and rules are not always uniform and enforcement of these laws, regulations and rules involve uncertainties, which may limit legal protections available to us. For example, we may have to resort to administrative and court proceedings to enforce the legal protection that we enjoy either by law or contract. However, since Chinese administrative authorities and courts have significant discretion in interpreting and implementing statutory and contractual terms, it may be more difficult than in more developed legal systems to evaluate the outcome of administrative and court proceedings and the level of legal protection we enjoy. These uncertainties may impede our ability to enforce the contracts we have entered into with customers, suppliers, other business partners and government authorities. In addition, such uncertainties, including the inability to enforce our contracts, could materially adversely affect our business and operations.

Furthermore, intellectual property rights and confidentiality protections in China may not be as effective as in the U.S. or other countries. Furthermore, Chinese tax authorities may reduce or terminate tax incentives that our Chinese subsidiaries currently enjoy, and their enforcement practice of certain tax laws, such as laws regulating transfers of equity interests in our Chinese subsidiaries remain uncertain. Accordingly, we cannot predict the effect of future developments in the Chinese legal system, including the promulgation of new laws, changes to existing laws or the interpretation or enforcement thereof, or the preemption of national laws by local regulations. These uncertainties could limit the legal protections available to us and other foreign investors, including you. In addition, any litigation in China may be protracted and result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management attention.

39

Table of Contents

Chinese regulations relating to overseas investment by Chinese residents may restrict our overseas and cross-border investment activities and adversely affect the implementation of our strategy as well as our business and prospects.

On July 4, 2014, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange of China, or SAFE, issued the Circular on the Administration of Foreign Exchange Issues Related to Overseas Investment, Financing and Roundtrip Investment by Domestic Residents through Offshore Special Purpose Vehicles, or the SAFE Circular 37, which replaced the former circular commonly known as “SAFE Circular 75” promulgated on October 21, 2005. The SAFE Circular 37 requires Chinese residents to register with the competent local SAFE branch in connection with their direct establishment or indirect control of an offshore special purpose vehicle, for the purpose of overseas investment and financing, with such Chinese residents’ legally owned assets or equity interests in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests. The SAFE Circular 37 further requires amendment to the registration in the event of any significant changes with respect to the special purpose vehicle, such as any change of basic information (including change of the Chinese residents, name and operation term), increase or decrease of capital contribution by Chinese individuals, share transfer or exchange, Redomicile Merger, division or other material event. In the event that a Chinese shareholder holding interests in a special purpose vehicle fails to fulfill the required SAFE registration, the Chinese subsidiaries of that special purpose vehicle may be prohibited from making profit distributions to the offshore parent and from carrying out subsequent cross-border foreign exchange activities, and the special purpose vehicle may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital into its Chinese subsidiary. Moreover, failure to comply with the various SAFE registration requirements described above could result in liability under Chinese law for evasion of foreign exchange controls.

The failure of our Chinese beneficial owners to comply with the registration procedures set forth in the SAFE Circular 37 may subject such beneficial owners and our Chinese subsidiaries to fines and legal sanctions. Such failure may also result in restrictions on our Chinese subsidiaries’ ability to distribute profits to us or our ability to inject capital into our Chinese subsidiaries or otherwise materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, since the SAFE Circular 37 was recently promulgated and it is unclear how this regulation, and any future regulation concerning offshore or cross-border transactions, will be interpreted and implemented by the relevant Chinese government authorities. We cannot predict how these regulations will affect our business operations or future strategy.

We may rely on dividends paid by our PRC subsidiaries to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have. Any limitation on the ability of our PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends to us could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct our business and to pay dividends to holders of our Shares.

With China being one of our major markets, we may rely on dividends to be paid by our wholly owned PRC subsidiaries for our cash and financing requirements, including the funds necessary to pay dividends and other cash distributions to the holders of our Shares and service any debt we may incur. If our wholly owned PRC subsidiaries incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other distributions to us.

Under PRC laws and regulations, wholly foreign-owned enterprises in the PRC may pay dividends only out of their accumulated profits as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. In addition, a wholly foreign-owned enterprise is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, after making up previous years’ accumulated losses, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds, until the aggregate amount of such a fund reaches 50% of its registered capital. In addition, at the discretion of the wholly foreign-owned enterprise, it may allocate a portion of its after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to staff welfare and bonus funds. These reserve funds and staff welfare and bonus funds are not distributable as cash dividends. Any limitation on the ability of our wholly owned PRC subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other distributions to us could materially and adversely limit our ability to grow, make investments or acquisitions that could be beneficial to our business, pay dividends, or otherwise fund and conduct our business.

40

Table of Contents

If the PRC government finds that the structure we have adopted for the e-commerce business does not comply with PRC governmental restrictions on foreign investment in internet-based businesses, or if these laws or regulations or interpretations of existing laws or regulations change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties, including the shutting down of the e-commerce and investment platform.

Foreign ownership of internet-based businesses is subject to significant restrictions under current PRC laws and regulations. The PRC government regulates the conduct of online commerce through strict business licensing requirements and other government regulations. These laws and regulations also limit foreign ownership in PRC companies that provide internet information distribution services. Companies operating internet-based businesses such as the www.solarbao.com e- commerce and investment platform primarily targeting retail customers in China are governed by these rules and regulations in China.

According to the Administrative Rules for Foreign Investments in Telecommunications Enterprises (the “FITE Regulations”) issued by the State Council of the PRC on December 11, 2001 and amended on September 10, 2008, foreign investors’ ultimate equity ownership in an entity in the PRC providing value-added telecommunications services shall not exceed 50% and a foreign investor wishing to acquire any equity interest in a value-added telecommunications business in the PRC must demonstrate (i) a good track record, and (ii) experience in providing value-added telecommunications services. In accordance with the Catalogue of Industries for Guiding Foreign Investment (2011 Revision) (the “Old Catalogue”), our e-commerce business, which is defined as a type of value-added telecommunication services, is classified into “Catalogue of industries in which foreign investment is restricted.” On March 10, 2015, the Ministry of Commerce of the PRC, or MOFCOM, and National Development and Reform Commission of the PRC published the Catalogue of Industries for Guiding Foreign Investment (2015 Revision) (the “Revised Catalogue”) which took effect on April 10, 2015. In the Revised Catalogue, e-commerce, as opposed to other value-added telecommunication services, is exempted from the restricted category. However, this new change has not been reflected in the FITE Regulations by any amendment, thus we should still rely on the contractual arrangement among our PRC subsidiary, Solar Energy E-Commerce and its shareholders for the operation of the e- commerce business in order to comply with the FITE Regulations.

On January 19, 2015, the Ministry of Commerce of the PRC, or MOFCOM, published a draft of the PRC Law on Foreign Investment (Draft for Comment), or the Draft Foreign Investment Law, which is open for public comments until February 17, 2015. At the same time, MOFCOM published an accompanying explanatory note of the Draft Foreign Investment Law, or the Explanatory Note, which contains important information about the Draft Foreign Investment Law, including its drafting philosophy and principles, main content, plans to transition to the new legal regime and treatment of business in China controlled by foreign invested enterprises, or FIEs, primarily through contractual arrangements. The Draft Foreign Investment Law is intended to replace the current foreign investment legal regime consisting of three laws: the Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-Foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-Invested Enterprise Law, as well as detailed implementing rules. The Draft Foreign Investment Law proposes significant changes to the PRC foreign investment legal regime. The proposed Draft Foreign Investment Law is to regulate FIEs the same way as PRC domestic entities, except for those FIEs that operate in industries deemed to be either “restricted” or “prohibited” in a “Negative List.” Because the Negative List has yet to be published, it is unclear whether it will differ from the current list of industries subject to restrictions or prohibitions on foreign investment. The Draft Foreign Investment Law also provides that only FIEs operating in industries on the Negative List will require entry clearance and other approvals that are not required of PRC domestic entities. As a result of the entry clearance and approvals, certain FIEs’ operating in industries on the Negative List may not be able to continue to conduct their operations through contractual arrangements. There is substantial uncertainty regarding the Draft Foreign Investment Law, including, among others, what the actual content of the law will be as well as the adoption and effective date of the final form of the law. While such uncertainty exists, we cannot assure you that the new foreign investment law, when it is adopted and becomes effective, will not have a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct the e-commerce business through our contractual arrangements.

41

Table of Contents

Since we are a California corporation and due to PRC governmental restrictions on foreign investment in internet-based business in China, Solar Energy E-Commerce was established in late 2014 and commenced operation in early 2015. Solar Energy E-Commerce operates www.solarbao.com e-commerce and investment platform which primarily targets retail customers residing in China. Our PRC subsidiary, Yan Hua Internet, entered into a series of contractual arrangements with Solar Energy E-Commerce and its shareholders on March 26, 2015. We expect Solar Energy E-Commerce to be our PRC variable interest entity and consolidate its financial results in our financial statements once the enforceability of these contractual arrangements is established.

We believe that our current corporate structure of our PRC subsidiaries and Solar Energy E-Commerce, and the contractual arrangements among our PRC subsidiary, Solar Energy E-Commerce and its shareholders are in compliance with existing PRC laws, rules and regulations. However, we are advised by our PRC legal adviser, Grandall Law Firm (Shanghai), that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current or future PRC laws and regulations, and these laws or regulations or interpretations of these laws or regulations may change in the future. Furthermore, the relevant government authorities have broad discretion in interpreting these laws and regulations. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that PRC government authorities will not ultimately take a contrary view.

If our contractual arrangements for the operation of the e-commerce business in China are found to be in violation of any existing or future PRC laws or regulations, the relevant governmental authorities would have broad discretion in dealing with such violation, including levying fines, shutting down or blocking the www.solarbao.com e-commerce and investment platform, discontinuing or placing restrictions on the www.solarbao.com operations, or taking other regulatory or enforcement actions that could be harmful to our business. Any of these actions may disrupt the operations of the e-commerce business and adversely affect our business, reputation, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely on contractual arrangements with Solar Energy E-Commerce and its shareholders for the operation of e-commerce business, which may not be as effective as direct ownership.

Because of PRC restrictions on foreign ownership of e-commerce businesses in China, we depend on contractual arrangements with Solar Energy E-Commerce in which we have no ownership interest to conduct the e-commerce business. These contractual arrangements are intended to provide us with effective control over this entity and allow us to obtain its economic benefits. We expect Solar Energy E-Commerce to be our PRC variable interest entity and consolidate its financial results in our financial statements once the enforceability of these contractual arrangements is established. Solar Energy E-Commerce is owned directly by our core management team, Mr. Xiaofeng Peng, Mr. Min Xiahou and Ms. Amy Jing Liu. However, these contractual arrangements may not be as effective in providing control as direct ownership. For example, Solar Energy E-Commerce and its shareholders could breach their contractual arrangements with us by, among other things, failing to operate the e-commerce business in an acceptable manner or taking other actions that are detrimental to our interests. If we were the controlling shareholder of Solar Energy E-Commerce with direct ownership, we would be able to exercise our rights as shareholders to effect changes to its board of directors, which in turn could implement changes at the management and operational level. However, under the current contractual arrangements, as a legal matter, if Solar Energy E-Commerce or its shareholders fail to perform their obligations under these contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs to enforce such arrangements, and rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including contract remedies, which may be time-consuming, unpredictable and expensive. If we are unable to enforce these contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant delay or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, our business and operations could be severely disrupted, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations and damage our reputation. See “—If the PRC government finds that the structure we have adopted for the e-commerce business does not comply with PRC governmental restrictions on foreign investment in internet-based businesses, or if these laws or regulations or interpretations of existing laws or regulations change in the future, we could be subject to severe penalties, including the shutting down of the e-commerce and investment platform.”

42

Table of Contents

The shareholders of Solar Energy E-Commerce may have potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business.

The individual shareholders of Solar Energy E-Commerce are also shareholders, directors and officers of our company. Conflicts of interest may arise between the roles of these individuals as shareholders, directors and officers of our company and as shareholders of Solar Energy E-Commerce. We cannot assure you that when conflicts arise, shareholders of Solar Energy E-Commerce will act in the best interest of our company or that the conflicts will be resolved in our favor. For example, these individuals with dual roles may decide to transfer significant business or assets of Solar Energy E-Commerce to other legal entities they own or control, or opportunities may arise in the future for these individuals to sell Solar Energy E-Commerce or its significant business or assets to third parties at a premium. Under either circumstance, the consideration of such a transfer or sale would be paid to the shareholders of Solar Energy E-Commerce, not to our company or our other shareholders, which may be materially detrimental to our other shareholders. In addition, these individuals may otherwise breach or cause Solar Energy E-Commerce to breach or refuse to renew its existing contractual arrangements with us. Currently, we do not have existing arrangements to address such potential conflicts of interest between these individuals and our company. Solar Energy E-Commerce’s shareholders are also our directors and officers who are subject to the laws of the State of California which require that a company’s directors and officers owe a duty of care and loyalty to act in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. If we cannot resolve any conflicts of interest or disputes between us and these shareholders, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which may be expensive, time-consuming and disruptive to our operations. There is also substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

The heightened scrutiny over acquisition transactions by the PRC tax authorities may have a negative impact on our business operations, our acquisition or restructuring strategy or the value of your investment in us.

Pursuant to the Notice on Strengthening the Administration on Enterprise Income Tax for Non-resident Enterprise Equity Transfer (the “SAT Circular 698”) issued by China’s State Administration of Taxation (“SAT”) in December 2009 with retroactive effect from January 1, 2008, where a non-resident enterprise transfers the equity interests of a PRC resident enterprise indirectly by disposition of the equity interests of an overseas non-public holding company, or an Indirect Transfer, using a “substance over form” principle, the PRC tax authority may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company if it lacks a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of reducing, avoiding or deferring PRC tax. As a result, gains derived from such Indirect Transfer may be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of up to 10%. SAT Circular 698 also provides that where a non-PRC resident enterprise transfers its equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise to its related parties at a price lower than the fair market value, the relevant tax authority has the power to make a reasonable adjustment to the taxable income of the transaction.

On February 3, 2015, the SAT released the Announcement on Several Issues concerning the Enterprise Income Tax on Income from the Indirect Transfer of Assets by Non-Resident Enterprises (Announcement 7). Announcement 7 does not replace Circular 698 in its entirety; instead, it abolishes certain provisions and provides more comprehensive guidelines on a number of issues. Although it becomes effective from the date of issuance, it also applies to transactions that took place prior to the effective date but review of which has not yet been concluded by the tax bureaus.

43

Table of Contents

Announcement 7 stipulates that when a non-resident enterprise engages in an indirect transfer of assets, including shares of PRC resident enterprise, through an arrangement that does not have a bona fide commercial purpose in order to avoid China’s enterprise income tax, the transaction should be re-characterized as a direct transfer of the PRC assets. Announcement 7 stipulates SAT’s intention to provide relief to some qualified transactions. Article 6 of Announcement 7 provides for a safe harbor for indirect transfers resulting from qualified group internal reorganizations. An indirect transfer that satisfies all of the following three conditions will be deemed to have a bona fide commercial purpose and thus will not be taxable under Announcement 7:

Where more than 50% of the value of the equity interest of the non-resident intermediary enterprise is derived directly or indirectly from immovable assets located in PRC, the qualified ownership requirement will be increased to 100%.

Announcement 7 may be determined by the tax authorities to be applicable to previous investments or the current merger restructure by non-resident investors in our Company, if any of such transactions were determined by the tax authorities to lack reasonable commercial purpose. Although we believe that the risk of SAT Circular 698 or Announcement 7 applying to the Redomicile Merger is low, we and our existing non-resident investors may become at risk of being taxed under Announcement 7 and may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with Announcement 7 or to establish that we should not be taxed under Announcement 7, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations or such non-resident investors’ investments in us. We have conducted and may conduct acquisitions involving changes in corporate structures, and historically our shares were transferred by certain then shareholders to our current shareholders. We cannot assure you that the PRC tax authorities will not, at their discretion, adjust any capital gains and impose tax return filing obligations on us or require us to provide assistance for the investigation of PRC tax authorities with respect thereto. Any PRC tax imposed on a transfer of our Shares or any adjustment of such gains would cause us to incur additional costs and may have a negative impact on the value of your investment in us.

The ongoing debt crisis in the Eurozone and market perceptions concerning the instability of the Euro and the European economy could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financing.

Concerns persist regarding the debt burden of certain Eurozone countries and their ability to meet future financial obligations, the overall stability of the Euro and the suitability of the Euro as a single currency given the diverse economic and political circumstances in individual Eurozone countries. In particular, Greece, our largest market in terms of attributable capacity of projects in operation, is widely viewed as requiring fundamental economic reforms which might affect the Euro as a currency. These concerns or market perceptions concerning these and related issues could adversely affect the value of our Euro-denominated assets and obligations and lead to future economic slowdowns.

44

Table of Contents

Risks Related to our Shares, Ordinary Shares of SPI Energy and the ADSs

We have significant “equity overhang” which could adversely affect the market price of our Shares and impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities.

As of the Record Date, we had [●] Shares outstanding, including [●] Shares, or approximately [●]% of total Shares outstanding, held by LDK. The possibility that substantial amounts of our outstanding Shares may be sold by LDK or the perception that such sales could occur, or “equity overhang”, could adversely affect the market price of our Shares, ordinary shares of SPI Energy and ADSs representing those ordinary shares of SPI Energy, and could impair our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of equity securities in the future.

We are subject to litigation risks, including securities class actions and shareholder derivative actions, which may be costly to defend and the outcome of which is uncertain.

From time to time, we are subject to legal claims, with and without merit, that may be costly and which may divert the attention of our management and our resources in general. In addition, our solar projects may be subject to litigation or other adverse proceedings that may adversely impact our ability to proceed with construction or grid connection or sell a given project, which would adversely affect our ability to recognize revenue with respect to such project. The results of complex legal proceedings are difficult to predict. Lawsuits filed against us may assert types of claims that, if resolved against us, could give rise to substantial damages, and an unfavorable outcome or settlement of one or more of these lawsuits, or any future lawsuits, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, or results of operations. Even if these lawsuits are not resolved against us, the costs of defending such lawsuits may not be covered by our insurance policies. We cannot assure you that additional litigation will not be filed against us in the future.

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates, judgments, and assumptions that may ultimately prove to be incorrect.

The accounting estimates and judgments that management must make in the ordinary course of business affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the periods presented. If the underlying estimates are ultimately proven to be incorrect, subsequent adjustments could have a material adverse effect on our operating results for the period or periods in which the change is identified.

It may be difficult to effect service of process on, or to enforce any judgments obtained outside the PRC against us, our directors, or our senior management members who reside in the PRC.

Most of our existing directors and senior management members reside in the PRC and most of our assets and the assets of such persons are located in the PRC. Accordingly, it may be difficult for investors to effect service of process in the United States on us or on any of these persons or to enforce judgments obtained outside of the PRC against us or any of these persons. The PRC does not have treaties providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments awarded by courts in many developed countries, including the U.S. and the U.K. Therefore, the recognition and enforcement in the PRC of judgments of a court in any of these jurisdictions in relation to any matter not subject to a binding arbitration provision may be difficult or even impossible.

SPI Energy’s shareholders may experience future dilution.

SPI Energy’s amended and restated memorandum and articles of association, which will become effective upon completion of the Redomicile Merger, permits our board of directors, without shareholder approval, to authorize the issuance of preferred shares. The board of directors may classify or reclassify any preferred shares to set the preferences, rights and other terms of the classified or reclassified shares, including the issuance of

45

Table of Contents

preferred shares that have preference rights over SPI Energy’s ordinary shares with respect to dividends, liquidation and voting rights. Furthermore, substantially all of SPI Energy’s ordinary shares for which our outstanding stock options are exercisable are, once they have been purchased, eligible for immediate sale in the public market.

The issuance of additional shares in the capital of SPI Energy or the exercise of stock options or warrants could be substantially dilutive to your shares and may negatively affect the market price of the ADSs.

Our stock price is, and the price of the ADSs, may be highly volatile.

Our stock price and, after the Redomicile Merger, the price of the ADSs representing SPI Energy’s ordinary shares could be subject to wide fluctuations in the future in response to many events or factors, including those discussed in the preceding risk factors relating to our operations and the Redomicile Merger, as well as:

General market conditions and U.S. or international macroeconomic factors unrelated to our performance may also affect our share price and SPI Energy’s share price after the Redomicile Merger. For these reasons, investors should not rely on recent trends to predict future share prices or financial results. The Company and SPI Energy are in the process of applying for listing of the ADSs with the Nasdaq Capital Market and there is no assurance that such application would be approved if the trading price as quoted on the OTC Markets fluctuates significantly. Furthermore, following periods of volatility in a company’s securities, securities class action litigation against a company is sometimes instituted.

The articles of association of SPI Energy contain anti-takeover provisions that could prevent a change in control even if such takeover is beneficial to SPI Energy shareholders.

SPI Energy will adopt an amended and restated memorandum and articles of association that will become effective immediately upon completion of the Redomicile Merger. Such articles of association contain provisions that could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of SPI Energy that could be beneficial to our shareholders. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other shareholders to elect directors and take other corporate actions. As a result, these provisions could limit the price that investors are willing to pay for the ADSs. These provisions might also discourage a potential acquisition proposal or tender offer, even if the acquisition proposal or tender offer is at a price above the then current market price of the ADSs. These provisions provide that the board of directors of SPI Energy has authority, without further action by our shareholders, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation

46

Table of Contents

preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with the ordinary shares, in the form of ADSs or otherwise. The board of directors may decide to issue such preferred shares quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of SPI Energy or make the removal of our management more difficult. If the board of directors decides to issue such preferred shares, the price of the ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of holders of the ordinary shares of SPI Energy and the ADSs may be materially adversely affected.

You may not receive dividends or other distributions on ordinary shares of SPI Energy and you may not receive any value for them, if it is illegal or impractical to make them available to you.

Under Cayman Islands law, SPI Energy may only pay dividends out of its profits or share premium account subject to its ability to pay its debts as they fall due in the ordinary course of its business. SPI Energy’s ability to pay dividends will therefore depend on its ability to generate sufficient profits. SPI Energy cannot give any assurance that SPI Energy will declare dividends of any amounts, at any rate or at all in the future. We have not paid any dividends in the past. Future dividends, if any, will be paid at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to requirements under Cayman Islands law and SPI Energy’s memorandum and articles of association, as amended and restated from time to time, and will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital expenditure requirements, general financial conditions, legal and contractual restrictions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant.

The depositary has agreed to pay to you the cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on ordinary shares of SPI Energy or other deposited securities underlying the ADSs, after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of ordinary shares your ADSs represent. However, the depositary is not responsible for making such distribution if it decides that it is unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to any holders of ADSs. For example, it would be unlawful to make a distribution to a holder of ADSs if it consists of securities that require registration under the Securities Act but that are not properly registered or distributed under an applicable exemption from registration. The depositary may also determine that it is not feasible to distribute certain property through the mail. Additionally, the value of certain distributions may be less than the cost of mailing such distributions. In these cases, the depositary may determine not to distribute such property. SPI Energy has no obligation to register under U.S. securities laws any ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or other securities received through such distributions. SPI Energy also has no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of ADSs. This means that you may not receive distributions we make on the ordinary shares of SPI Energy or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical for us to make them available to you. These restrictions may cause a material decline in the value of the ADSs.

Holders of ADSs have fewer rights than shareholders and must act through the depositary to exercise those rights.

As a holder of ADSs upon consummation of the Redomicile Merger, you will not be treated as one of the shareholders of SPI Energy and you will not have shareholder rights. Instead, the depositary will be treated as the holder of the shares underlying your ADSs. However, you may exercise some of the shareholders’ rights through the depositary, and you will have the right to withdraw the shares underlying your ADSs from the deposit facility.

Holders of ADSs may only exercise the voting rights with respect to the underlying ordinary shares in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the amended and restated memorandum and articles of association that will become effective immediately upon completion of the Redomicile Merger, the minimum notice period required to convene a general meeting is 14 clear days. When a general meeting is convened, you may not receive sufficient notice of a shareholders’ meeting to permit you to withdraw your ordinary shares to allow you to cast your vote with respect to any specific matter. In addition, the depositary and its agents may not be able to send voting instructions to you or carry out your voting instructions in a timely

47

Table of Contents

manner. SPI Energy plans to make all reasonable efforts to cause the depositary to extend voting rights to you in a timely manner, but we cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote your ADSs. Furthermore, the depositary and its agents will not be responsible for any failure to carry out any instructions to vote, for the manner in which any vote is cast or for the effect of any such vote. As a result, you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and you may lack recourse if your ADSs are not voted as you requested. In addition, in your capacity as an ADS holder, you will not be able to call a shareholder meeting.

You may be subject to limitations on transfers of your ADSs.

Your ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its transfer books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. In addition, the depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer or register transfers of ADSs generally when SPI Energy’s books or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if SPI Energy or the depositary deem it advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or government body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason.

48

Table of Contents

SOLICITATION OF WRITTEN CONSENTS

Purpose of the Consent Solicitation

You are being asked to consent to approve the Merger Agreement and thereby approve the Redomicile Merger. The Company’s board of directors has approved and declared advisable the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement and has determined that the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, including the Redomicile Merger, are in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Company’s board of directors recommends that you consent to the Merger Agreement and thereby approve the Redomicile Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

Record Date

The Company’s board of directors has set [●], 2015 as the record date for determining the Company’s shareholders entitled to sign and deliver written consents with respect to the Merger Agreement.

Shareholders of the Company Entitled To Written Consent

Only the Company’s shareholders of record as of the close of business on the record date are entitled to sign and deliver Written Consents with respect to the Merger Agreement. As of the close of business on the record date, there were [●] shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding and entitled to sign and deliver Written Consents with respect to the Merger Agreement. Each share of the Company’s common stock is entitled to one vote. You are urged to return a completed, dated and signed Written Consent by 12:00 noon, [●] time, on [●], 2015.

Written Consents; Written Consents Required

Written consents from holders owning a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock entitled to vote are required to adopt the Merger Agreement.

Submission of Consents

You may consent to the approval of the Merger Agreement with respect to your shares of the Company’s common stock by completing, dating and signing the Written Consent enclosed with this consent solicitation statement/prospectus and returning it to the Company.

If you hold shares of common stock of the Company as of the close of business on the Record Date and you wish to give your Written Consent, you must fill out the enclosed Written Consent, date and sign it, and promptly return it to the Company. Once you have completed, dated and signed the Written Consent, you may deliver it to the Company by:

The Company’s board of directors has set 12:00 noon, [●], on [●], 2015 as the date for the receipt of Written Consents. The Company reserves the right to extend the final date for the receipt of Written Consents beyond [●], 2015 in its sole discretion. Any such extension may be made without notice to the Company’s shareholders. Once a sufficient number of Written Consents to adopt and approve the Merger Agreement have been received, the Consent Solicitation will conclude.

49

Table of Contents

Executing Consents; Revocation of Consents

You may execute a Written Consent to approve the Merger Agreement. If you do not return your Written Consent, it will have the same effect as a vote against the Merger Agreement. If you are a record holder of shares of the Company’s common stock and you return a signed written consent without indicating your decision on the Merger Agreement, you will have consented to adopt and approve the Merger Agreement even though you did not indicate your decision.

If you are a record holder of shares of the Company’s common stock as of the close of business on the Record Date, you may change or revoke your Written Consent at any time prior to 12:00 noon, Roseville, CA time, on [•], 2015 (or, if earlier, before Written Consents of a sufficient number of shares to approve the Merger Agreement has been filed with the Secretary of the Company). If you wish to change or revoke your Written Consent before that time, you may do so by sending a new Written Consent with a later date to Secretary of the Company, 3400 Douglas Blvd., Suite 285; Roseville, CA 95661-3888 or by delivering a notice of revocation by:

Solicitation of Consents; Expenses

The expense of preparing, printing and mailing this consent solicitation statement/prospectus is being borne by the Company. Directors, officers and employees of the Company may solicit consents by telephone and personally, in addition to solicitation by mail. These persons will receive their regular salaries but no special compensation for soliciting consents.

50

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL 1