As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 2, 2015
Registration Statement No. 333-206667
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 1
to
Form F-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
IC POWER PTE. LTD.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Singapore | (Company Registration No. 201511865D) | Not applicable | ||
4911 | ||||
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number) |
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
1 Temasek Avenue
# 36-01
Millenia Tower
Singapore 039192
Telephone: +65 6351 1780
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
C T Corporation System
111 Eighth Avenue
New York, New York 10011
Telephone: + 1 212 894 8940
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrants agent for service of process)
Copies to:
Scott V. Simpson James A. McDonald Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom (UK) LLP 40 Bank Street London E14 5DS United Kingdom Telephone: +44 20 7519 7000 Facsimile: +44 20 7519 7070 |
Mark Bagnall John Vetterli White & Case LLP 200 Biscayne Blvd. Suite 4900 Miami, Florida 33131 Telephone: 305 371 2700 Facsimile: 305 358 5744 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act), check the following box. ¨
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
|
||||
Title of each class of securities to be registered |
Proposed maximum aggregate offering price (1)(2) |
Amount of registration fee (3) |
||
Ordinary shares, no par value |
$100,000,000 | $11,620 | ||
|
||||
|
(1) | Includes additional ordinary shares that may be sold upon exercise of a purchase option to be granted to the underwriters. |
(2) | Estimated solely for the purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457(o) of the Securities Act of 1933. |
(3) | Previously paid. |
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
The information in this prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Subject to Completion
Preliminary Prospectus Dated , 2015
PROSPECTUS
Ordinary Shares
This is the initial public offering of ordinary shares, no par value, of IC Power Pte. Ltd., or IC Power, a private company limited by shares incorporated under the laws of Singapore. We expect the public offering price to be between $ and $ per ordinary share.
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our ordinary shares. We are in the process of applying to list our ordinary shares on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, under the symbol ICP.
Prior to the completion of this offering, Kenon Holdings Ltd. (NYSE: KEN; TASE: KEN), or Kenon, our sole shareholder, will effect a reorganization pursuant to which it will transfer all of its equity interests in its wholly-owned subsidiary I.C. Power Ltd., or ICP, which holds power generation companies in Latin America, the Caribbean and Israel, to us, as more fully described in Corporate Formation and Reorganization . Upon the completion of this offering and the above-mentioned reorganization, and assuming an initial public offering price equal to the mid-point of the price range set forth above, Kenon will control approximately % of the aggregate voting power of our ordinary shares, or approximately % if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase up to additional ordinary shares from us. For further information, see Principal Shareholders .
Investing in our ordinary shares involves risks. See Risk Factors beginning on page 23 to read about certain factors you should consider before purchasing our ordinary shares.
Per Share |
Total |
|||||||
Initial public offering price |
$ | $ | ||||||
Underwriting discounts and commissions (1) |
$ | $ | ||||||
Proceeds to us, before expenses |
$ | $ |
(1) | See Underwriting for a description of compensation payable to the underwriters. |
We have agreed to allow the underwriters to purchase up to an additional ordinary shares from us, at the public offering price, less the underwriting discounts and commissions, within days from the date of this prospectus.
The underwriters expect to deliver our ordinary shares to purchasers against payment on or about , 2015.
Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
BofA Merrill Lynch | Credit Suisse |
Goldman, Sachs & Co. | UBS Investment Bank |
HSBC | Scotiabank | Credicorp Capital |
The date of this prospectus is , 2015.
* | 2,149 MW of proportionate capacity |
** | Our Adjusted EBITDA in 2014 was $395 million, compared to $41 million in 2008. |
ii | ||||
ii | ||||
iii | ||||
iii | ||||
iv | ||||
iv | ||||
iv | ||||
ix | ||||
1 | ||||
14 | ||||
17 | ||||
23 | ||||
56 | ||||
59 | ||||
60 | ||||
60 | ||||
61 | ||||
62 | ||||
63 | ||||
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
68 | |||
123 | ||||
135 | ||||
205 | ||||
212 | ||||
213 | ||||
215 | ||||
240 | ||||
242 | ||||
247 | ||||
258 | ||||
258 | ||||
258 | ||||
259 | ||||
F-1 |
Neither we nor the underwriters (nor any of our or their respective affiliates) have authorized anyone to provide any information other than that contained in this prospectus or in any free writing prospectus prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we may have referred you. We take no responsibility for, and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. If anyone provides you with additional, different, or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. Neither we nor the underwriters (nor any of our or their respective affiliates) are making an offer to sell the ordinary shares in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or any sale of the ordinary shares. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity may have changed since the date on the front cover of this prospectus.
Neither we nor any of the underwriters have taken any action to permit a public offering of the ordinary shares outside the United States or to permit the possession or distribution of this prospectus outside the United
i
States. Persons outside the United States who come into possession of this prospectus must inform themselves about and observe any restrictions relating to the offering of the ordinary shares and the distribution of this prospectus outside the United States.
Until , 2015 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that buy, sell or trade in our ordinary shares, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriter and with respect to their unsold allotment or subscription.
As described under Corporate Formation and Reorganization , we were formed in May 2015 to serve as the holding company of I.C. Power Ltd. and its businesses. Prior to the completion of this offering, Kenon, our sole shareholder, will effect a reorganization pursuant to which it will transfer all of its equity interests in its wholly-owned subsidiary ICP to us in exchange for (i) receipt of our ordinary shares issued for such purpose and (ii) receipt of a note payable by us to Kenon in an aggregate principal amount of $220 million, which transactions we collectively refer to as the Reorganization. Additionally, prior to the completion of this offering, we will be converted into a Singapore public company limited by shares and renamed . Except as otherwise indicated, or unless the context requires otherwise, references to the Company, we, us and our prior to the date hereof shall refer to ICP and its businesses, and as of the date hereof and thereafter, to IC Power and its subsidiaries, which subsidiaries shall include ICP as if the Reorganization had been consummated on the date hereof.
We present financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB, and all financial information included in this prospectus is presented in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB, except as otherwise indicated. In particular, this prospectus contains certain non-IFRS financial measures which are defined under Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Information and Business.
As set forth above, except as otherwise indicated, or unless the context requires otherwise, references to the Company, we, us and our prior to the date hereof shall refer to ICP and its businesses, and, as of the date hereof and thereafter, to IC Power and its subsidiaries, which subsidiaries shall include ICP as if the Reorganization had been consummated on the date hereof. The consolidated financial statements we have included in this prospectus, consists of I.C. Power Ltd.s: (1) unaudited condensed consolidated interim statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, and unaudited condensed consolidated interim statements of financial position as of June 30, 2015 and 2014, and the notes thereto; and (2) audited consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and audited consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the notes thereto. ICP presents its consolidated financial statements in U.S. Dollars.
This prospectus also includes the following financial statements of Generandes Perú S.A., or Generandes, prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB: (1) unaudited consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and unaudited consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the notes thereto; and (2) and audited consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and audited consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and the notes thereto. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Inkia Holdings (Acter) Limited, or Acter Holdings, we owned a 39% interest in Generandes (resulting in a 21% indirect interest in Edegel S.A.A., or Edegel), until we sold our interest in Generandes in September 2014. Prior to the execution of our agreement to sell Generandes in April 2014, we accounted for Generandes under the equity method and reflected our proportional share in the net income of Generandes in share in income
ii
of associated companies. As a result of our divestment of Generandes, our proportionate share in Generandes results of operations are reflected in discontinued operations for all periods discussed in this prospectus. The financial statements of Generandes are included in this prospectus in accordance with Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X, which does not require the inclusion of interim financial statements. Generandes financial statements have been audited in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Auditing Standards, or U.S. GAAS, except for the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, which are not required by Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X to be audited in accordance with U.S. GAAS or Public Company Accounting Oversight Board standards, as Generandes was an investee that would not be considered a significant subsidiary of ours as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 under Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X.
All references in this prospectus to (i) dollars, $ or USD are to U.S. Dollars; (ii) NIS or New Israeli Shekel are to the legal currency of the State of Israel, or Israel; (iii) Peruvian Nuevo Sol are to the legal currency of the Republic of Peru, or Peru; (iv) Bs and Bolivianos are to the legal currency of the Plurinational State of Bolivia, or Bolivia; (v) COP or Colombian pesos are to the legal currency of the Republic of Colombia, or Colombia; (vi) Chilean pesos are to the legal currency of the Republic of Chile, or Chile; and (vii) Singapore dollars or S$ are to the legal currency of the Republic of Singapore, or Singapore. We have made rounding adjustments to reach some of the figures included in this prospectus. Consequently, numerical figures shown as totals in some tables may not be arithmetic aggregations of the figures that precede them. Conversions included in this prospectus are solely illustrative, and you should not expect that any amounts in New Israeli Shekels, Peruvian Nuevo Sol, Bolivianos, Colombian pesos, Chilean pesos, or Singapore dollars actually represent a stated U.S. Dollar amount or that it could be converted into U.S. Dollars at the rate suggested.
NON-IFRS FINANCIAL INFORMATION
In this prospectus, we disclose non-IFRS financial measures, namely Adjusted EBITDA and Net Debt, each as defined in Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Information. Each of these measures is an important measure used by us, and our businesses, to assess financial performance. We believe that the disclosure of Adjusted EBITDA and Net Debt provides transparent and useful information to investors and financial analysts in their review of our, or our subsidiaries and associated companies, operating performance and in the comparison of such operating performance to the operating performance of other companies in the same industry or in other industries that have different capital structures, debt levels and/or income tax rates.
Certain information relating to our industry and market position used or referenced in this prospectus was obtained from internal analysis, surveys, market research, publicly available information and industry publications. Unless otherwise indicated, all sources for industry data are estimates or forecasts contained in or derived from internal or industry sources we believe to be reliable. Market data used throughout this prospectus was obtained from independent industry publications and other publicly available information. Such data, as well as internal surveys, industry forecasts and market research, while believed to be reliable, have not been independently verified. In addition, in certain cases we have made statements in this prospectus regarding our industry and position in the industry based upon our experience and our own investigation of market conditions. We cannot assure you that any of these assumptions are accurate or correctly reflect our position in the industry, and none of our internal surveys or information has been verified by independent sources.
Market data are inherently predictive and speculative and are not necessarily reflective of actual market conditions. Such statistics are based on market research, which itself is based on sampling and subjective judgments by both the researchers and the respondents, including judgments about what types of products and transactions should be included in the relevant market. In addition, the value of comparisons of statistics for different markets is limited by many factors, including that (1) the markets are defined differently, (2) the underlying information was gathered by different methods and (3) different assumptions were applied in compiling the data. Accordingly, the market statistics included in this prospectus should be viewed with caution.
iii
REPRESENTATION OF CAPACITY AND PRODUCTION FIGURES
Unless otherwise indicated, statistics provided throughout this prospectus with respect to power generation units are expressed in MW, in the case of the capacity of such power generation units, and in GWh, in the case of the electricity production of such power generation units. Unless otherwise indicated, our capacity figures provided in this prospectus reflect 100% of the capacity of all of our assets, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset, and our consolidated generation figures provided in this prospectus reflect 100% of the generation figures of our subsidiaries, and excludes the generation figures of our associated companies. With respect to assets acquired during a year, generation figures are presented for the full year, regardless of the date within the year when the acquisition occurred. As a result, the generation figures provided in this prospectus of Colmito (as defined below), which we acquired in 2013, and ICPNH, Puerto Quetzal, Surpetroil and JPPC (each as defined below), which we acquired in 2014, reflect 100% of the generation figures of these companies for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, respectively, regardless of our date of acquisition of such companies. With respect to capacity figures for the year ended December 31, 2014, and any prior periods thereto, our capacity figures exclude Edegels 1,540 MW of capacity, as a result of the sale of our indirect interest in Edegel in September 2014. For information on our ownership interest in each of our operating companies and investments, see Business.
ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL LIABILITIES
IC Power is a private company limited by shares incorporated under the laws of Singapore. Some of its directors and officers and certain other persons named in this prospectus reside outside the United States. Additionally, a significant portion of IC Powers assets and the assets of its directors and officers and certain other persons named in this prospectus are located outside the United States.
As a result, it may not be possible for U.S. investors to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons or to enforce against them or against us in the U.S. courts judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States. There is doubt as to the enforceability in Singapore, either in original actions or in actions for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts, of civil liabilities predicated on the U.S. federal securities laws.
CERTAIN TERMS USED IN THIS PROSPECTUS
We have prepared this prospectus using a number of conventions, which you should consider when reading the information contained herein. In this prospectus:
Our Operating Companies, Assets in Advanced Stages of Construction, and Pipeline Projects
| AIE means Advanced Integrated Energy Ltd., an Israeli corporation; |
| Amayo I means Consorcio Eólico Amayo S.A., a Panamanian corporation; |
| Amayo II means Consorcio Eólico Amayo (Fase II) S.A., a Panamanian corporation; |
| CDA means Cerro del Águila S.A., a Peruvian corporation; |
| Cenérgica means Cenérgica, S.A. de C.V., a Salvadorian corporation; |
| Central Cardones means Central Cardones S.A., a Chilean corporation; |
| CEPP means Compañía de Electricidad de Puerto Plata S.A., a Dominican Republic corporation; |
| COBEE means Compañía Boliviana de Energía Eléctrica S.A., a Canadian corporation; |
| Colmito means Termoeléctrica Colmito Ltda., a Chilean corporation; |
iv
| Corinto means Empresa Energética Corinto Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation; |
| ICPI means IC Power Israel Ltd., an Israeli corporation; |
| ICPNH means IC Power Nicaragua Holdings, a Cayman Islands corporation, formerly known as AEI Nicaragua Holdings Ltd., or AEI Nicaragua; |
| Inkia means Inkia Energy Limited, a Bermudian corporation; |
| JPPC means Jamaica Private Power Company Ltd., a Jamaican corporation; |
| Kallpa means Kallpa Generación S.A., a Peruvian corporation; |
| Kanan means Kanan Overseas I. Inc., a Panamanian corporation; |
| Nejapa means Nejapa Power Company S. de R.L., a Panamanian corporation; |
| OPC means O.P.C. Rotem Ltd., an Israeli corporation; |
| Pedregal means Pedregal Power Company S.de.R.L, a Panamanian corporation; |
| Puerto Quetzal means Puerto Quetzal Power L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company; |
| Samay I means Samay I S.A., a Peruvian corporation; |
| Surpetroil means Surpetroil S.A.S., a Colombian corporation; and |
| Tipitapa Power means Tipitapa Power Company Ltd., a Cayman Islands corporation. |
Other Relevant Businesses
| Acter Holdings means Inkia Holdings (Acter) Limited, a Cayman Islands corporation through which we held our interest in Southern Cone; |
| Edegel means Edegel S.A.A., a Peruvian corporation; |
| Generandes means Generandes Perú S.A., a Peruvian corporation through which we held our indirect interest in Edegel; |
| Globeleq means Globeleq Americas Limited, which is the former name of Inkia Americas Limited, a Bermudian corporation; |
| Hadera Paper means Hadera Paper Ltd., an Israeli corporation; |
| IC means Israel Corporation Ltd., an Israeli corporation traded on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and Kenons former parent; |
| Kenon means Kenon Holdings Ltd., a Singapore company traded on each of the NYSE and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange; and |
| Southern Cone means Southern Cone Power Perú S.A., a Peruvian corporation through which we held our interest in Generandes. |
v
Regulatory Bodies and Electricity System Coordination Entities
| ANA means the National Water Authority of Peru ( Autoridad Nacional del Agua ); |
| CFE means the Federal Electricity Commission ( Comisión Federal de Electricidad ), which is Mexicos state-owned power utility; |
| CND means the National Dispatch Center of Panama ( Centro Nacional de Despacho ); |
| CNDC means the National Dispatch Committee of Bolivia ( Comité Nacional de Despacho de Carga ), a governmental entity responsible for planning and coordinating the operation of the generation, transmission and distribution systems that form the SIN in Bolivia; |
| CNDC Nicaragua means the National Dispatch Center ( Centro Nacional de Despacho de Carga ) of Nicaragua; |
| COES means the Committee for the Economic Operation of the System ( Comité de Operación Económica del Sistema Interconectado Nacional ), an independent and private Peruvian entity composed of qualified participants undertaking activities in SEIN which is responsible for planning and coordinating the operation of the generation, transmission and distribution systems that form the SEIN; |
| CREG means the Commission for the Regulation of Energy and Gas in Colombia ( Comisión de Regulación de Energía y Gas ); |
| IEC means Israel Electric Corporation, a government-owned entity, which generates and supplies the majority of electricity in Israel, transmits and distributes all of the electricity in Israel, acts as the system operator of Israels electricity system, determines the dispatch order of generation units, grants interconnection surveys, and sets spot prices, among other roles; |
| INDECOPI means the National Institute for the Defense of Competition and Intellectual Property Protection ( Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual ), the Peruvian antitrust and intellectual property regulator; |
| MINEM means the Ministry of Energy and Mines of Peru ( Ministerio de Energía y Minas ), which is responsible for, among other things, (a) setting national energy policy; (b) proposing and adopting laws and regulations to supervise the energy sector; (c) controlling expansion plans for SEIN; (d) approving proposed expansion plans by COES; (e) promoting scientific research and investment in energy; and (f) granting concessions and authorizations to entities who wish to operate in power generation, transmission or distribution in Peru; |
| OC means the Coordinating Body ( Organismo Coordinador ) , a Dominican governmental authority whose function is to plan and coordinate the operations of the generation, transmission and distribution systems that form the SENI; |
| OSINERGMIN means the Supervisory Body of Investment in Energy and Mining ( Organismo Supervisor de la Inversión en Energía y Minería ), a Peruvian governmental authority which is responsible for, among other things, ensuring that companies comply with the rules and regulations applicable to the energy industry in Peru and for setting the tariffs to be charged to regulated customers; |
| PUAE means Israels Public Utilities Authority (Electricity); |
vi
| Salvadorian CNE means the National Energy Commission of El Salvador ( Comisión Nacional de Energía) , a governmental entity which is responsible for proposing and adopting policies and regulations for the Salvadorian energy sector; |
| SEIN means the national interconnected electrical system of Peru ( Sistema Eléctrico Interconectado Nacional ); |
| SENI means the national interconnected electrical system of the Dominican Republic ( Sistema Eléctrico Nacional Interconectado ); |
| SIC means the national interconnected electrical system of Chile ( Sistema Interconectado Central ); |
| SIEPAC means Central American Electrical Interconnection System ( Sistema de Interconexión Eléctrica de los Países de América Central ) that connects the transmission systems of Nicaragua, Panama, Costa Rica, Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala through a 230 KW transmission line; |
| SIGET means the General Superintendency of Electricity and Telecommunications ( Superintendencia General de Electricidad y Telecomunicaciones ), a Salvadorian entity which is responsible for ensuring that companies comply with the rules and regulations passed by the Salvadorian CNE, as well as other laws that are applicable to the energy industry in El Salvador; |
| SIN means a national system formed by generation plants, the interconnected grid, regional transmission lines, distribution lines and consumer loads ( Sistema Interconectado Nacional ) in each of Bolivia, Colombia and Guatemala; |
| SING means the Interconnected System of Norte Grande of Chile ( Sistema Interconectado Norte Grande ); and |
| UPME means the Mining and Energy Planning Unit ( Unidad de Planeación Minero Energética ), a special administrative unit of the Ministry of Mines and Energy of Colombia. |
Industry and Other Terms
| availability factor means the percentage of hours a power generation unit is available for generation of electricity in the relevant period, whether or not the unit is actually dispatched or used for generating power; |
| Btu means British thermal units; |
| CAGR means compound annual growth rate; |
| COD means the commercial operation date of a development project; |
| distribution refers to the transfer of electricity from the transmission lines at grid supply points and its delivery to consumers at lower voltages through a distribution system; |
| EPC means engineering, procurement and construction; |
| firm capacity means the amount of energy available for production that, pursuant to applicable regulations, must be guaranteed to be available at a given time for injection to a certain power grid; |
vii
| greenfield projects means projects constructed on unused land with no need to demolish or remodel existing structures; |
| GWh means gigawatt hours (one GWh is equal to 1,000 MWh); |
| Heat rate means the number of Btu of energy contained in the fuel required to produce a kWh of energy (Btu/kWh) for thermal plants; |
| HFO means heavy fuel oil; |
| installed capacity means the intended full-load sustained output of energy that a generation unit is designed to produce (also referred to as name-plate capacity); |
| IPP means independent power producer, excluding co-generators and generators for self-consumption; |
| KWh means Kilowatts per hour; |
| MMBtu means one million metric Btus; |
| MW means megawatts (one MW is equal to 1,000 Kilowatts or KW); |
| MWh means megawatt per hour; |
| OEM means original equipment manufacturer; |
| our capacity or our installed capacity means, with respect to each asset, 100% of the capacity of such asset, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns such asset; |
| our proportionate capacity means, with respect to each asset, the proportionate capacity of such asset, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns such asset; |
| PPA means power purchase agreement; |
| transmission refers to the bulk transfer of electricity from generating facilities to the distribution system at load center station in which the electricity is stabilized by means of the transmission grid; and |
| weighted average availability refers to the number of hours that a generation facility is available to produce electricity divided by the total number of hours in a year. |
viii
The following tables set forth the historical period-end, average, high and low rates calculated using the daily closing exchange rates, as reported by Bloomberg, for the U.S. Dollar expressed in Peruvian Nuevo Sol per one U.S. Dollar for the periods indicated:
Peruvian Nuevo Sol/U.S. Dollar |
||||||||||||||||
Period End (1) |
Average (2) |
High |
Low |
|||||||||||||
Year |
||||||||||||||||
2010 |
2.816 | 2.826 | 2.857 | 2.791 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
2.697 | 2.755 | 2.816 | 2.697 | ||||||||||||
2012 |
2.568 | 2.638 | 2.693 | 2.568 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
2.786 | 2.703 | 2.802 | 2.552 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
2.963 | 2.839 | 2.963 | 2.787 |
1. | Represents the closing exchange rate on the last business day of the applicable period. |
2. | Represents the average of the closing exchange rates on the last business day of each month during the relevant one-year periods. |
Peruvian Nuevo
|
||||||||
High |
Low |
|||||||
Month |
||||||||
May 2015 |
3.156 | 3.130 | ||||||
June 2015 |
3.180 | 3.144 | ||||||
July 2015 |
3.194 | 3.172 | ||||||
August 2015 |
3.306 | 3.191 | ||||||
September 2015 |
3.254 | 3.184 | ||||||
October 2015 |
3.288 | 3.212 |
ix
This summary highlights information presented in greater detail elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that you should consider in making your investment decision. Before deciding whether to invest in our ordinary shares, you should carefully read this entire prospectus, especially the risks of investing in our ordinary shares discussed under the heading Risk Factors.
Overview
We are a leading owner, developer and operator of power facilities located in key power generation markets in Latin America, the Caribbean and Israel, utilizing a range of fuels, including natural gas, hydroelectric, HFO, diesel and wind. Currently, our principal focus is on Latin American markets, which typically have higher rates of growth of gross domestic product, or GDP, and lower overall and per capita energy consumption, as compared with more developed markets. We believe that economic growth in Latin American markets will drive increases in overall and per capita energy consumption and therefore require significant additional investments in power generation assets in those markets.
As of June 30, 2015, our installed capacity and our proportionate capacity were 2,642 MW and 2,149 MW, respectively. We expect to increase our installed capacity by 1,202 MW, or 45%, to 3,844 MW (3,074 MW on a proportionate basis) by the middle of 2016, upon the completion of the following assets in advanced stages of construction:
| Cerro del Aguila S.A.s, or CDAs, 510 MW hydroelectric project located in Peru, which we expect to be completed by the middle of 2016; |
| Samay I S.A.s, or Samay Is, 600 MW cold-reserve thermoelectric project located in Peru, which we expect to be completed by the middle of 2016; and |
| Kanan Overseas, I. Inc.s, or Kanans, 92 MW thermal generation project in Panama, which we expect to be completed by the end of 2015. |
ICPs activities started in 2007 when Inkia Energy Limited, or Inkia, a subsidiary of Israel Corporation Ltd., or IC, an Israeli conglomerate, acquired Globeleq Americas Limiteds, or Globeleqs, power generation assets in Latin America, which represented 549 MW of installed capacity. In 2010, IC formed ICP and contributed to it both Inkia and O.P.C. Rotem Ltd., or OPC. In January 2015, IC transferred ICP to Kenon (NYSE: KEN; TASE: KEN), our sole shareholder, in connection with ICs spin-off of Kenon. Prior to the completion of this offering, Kenon will effect a Reorganization pursuant to which it will transfer all of its equity interests in its wholly-owned subsidiary ICP to us, as more fully described in Corporate Formation and Reorganization .
Between 2007 and June 30, 2015, we invested approximately $2.5 billion in the acquisition, development and expansion of our power generation assets. Of this amount, 87% represented investments in greenfield development (including investments made in those assets in advanced stages of construction) and 13% represented acquisitions. We have financed our greenfield development using a combination of cash on hand, debt financing and investments by minority shareholders at the asset level, and have financed our acquisitions using cash on hand. Of the 2,093 MW we have added to our installed capacity since Inkias formation, 63% derived from greenfield development projects, consisting of our construction of the Kallpa combined cycle plant, which comprises Perus largest power generation facility, and the construction of OPCs plant, which became Israels first independent power producer, or IPP. In the same period, we have acquired businesses with an aggregate installed capacity of 783 MW, in five countries in Latin America and the
1
Caribbean. By the middle of 2016, we will have derived 76% of our installed capacity growth since 2007 from our greenfield development efforts (based upon our current portfolio and assuming the completion of our assets in advanced stages of construction).
By successfully pursuing growth opportunities, primarily through contracted greenfield development projects in existing markets and acquisitions of anchor investments in new markets, we have expanded our regional presence, diversified our portfolio through the addition of various facilities which use a range of fuels, and significantly increased our cash flows. In 2014, our Adjusted EBITDA was $395 million, as compared to $41 million in 2008, representing a CAGR of 46% during this period. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure. For a reconciliation of our net income to our Adjusted EBITDA, see Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Information Key Financial and Other Operating Information .
We typically enter into long-term U.S. dollar-linked power purchase agreements, or PPAs, to sell capacity and/or energy to customers that we believe have strong credit profiles, such as large local distribution companies or non-regulated customers that are subsidiaries of large multinational corporations. As of June 30, 2015, the weighted average remaining life of our PPAs was 10 years (including the remaining life of the PPAs for our assets in advanced stages of construction). In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, 88% and 92%, respectively, of our aggregate energy sales (in GWh) were made pursuant to PPAs. We believe this practice limits our exposure to fluctuations in energy spot market rates and helps us to generate strong and predictable margins and cash flows. We seek to enter into PPAs at prices that are equal to, or higher than, the prevailing spot market rates in the countries in which we operate. Additionally, the majority of our PPAs are indexed to the underlying fuel cost of the related long-term supply agreements. Such indexing generally limits our exposure to fuel price fluctuations, helping us to maintain our margins in such instances. We believe that the stable and predictable margins and cash flows which generally result from such PPAs helps us to successfully secure significant project and bank/bond financing, with no or limited recourse, from a diverse international lender base during construction of our greenfield projects, which helps us to successfully develop our project pipeline.
Our portfolio is comprised of power facilities located in key power generation markets in Latin America, the Caribbean and Israel, using a range of fuels. The following charts present the relative percentages of our installed capacity by fuel type and country, as adjusted to reflect the completion of our assets in advanced stages of construction (the CDA, Samay I and Kanan projects), and assuming no other changes in capacity.
Expected Installed Capacity by Energy Source (Middle of 2016) 1 |
Expected Installed Capacity by Country (Middle of 2016) |
|
|
|
|
3,844 MW |
1. | Our dual-fueled plants, OPC, Samay I, and Colmito, are categorized as natural gas, diesel and natural gas, respectively. |
2
The following charts set forth the relative percentage of our installed capacity by segment as of June 30, 2015, and our expected installed capacity by segment, as adjusted to assume the completion of our assets in advanced stages of construction (the CDA, Samay I and Kanan assets), and excluding additional capacity which may become available through other acquisitions or projects that we may complete by mid-2016 or other potential changes to our capacity:
Actual Installed Capacity by Segment (as of June 30, 2015) |
Expected Installed Capacity by Segment (Middle of 2016) |
|
|
|
Our largest market, Peru, is one of the fastest growing economies in Latin America, with average GDP growth of approximately 5.8% per year from 2009 through 2014, according to the International Monetary Fund, a mature regulatory framework and a well-run power system. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, our operating company in Peru had an installed capacity of 1,063 MW, representing 12.2% of Perus installed capacity, and generated 14.2% of the gross energy generated (in GWh) in Peru. As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015, our operating company in Peru represented 45% of our Adjusted EBITDA, 51% of our net income, and 40% of our installed capacity. Our assets in advanced stages of construction in Peru are expected to provide an additional 1,110 MW in installed capacity to address the expected increase in Peruvian energy demand, which is expected to result, in part, from the substantial investments made in connection with Perus energy-intensive mining industry and expected growth in its manufacturing industry.
We also operate OPC, the first IPP in Israel, which, following decades of state control, recently opened its electricity market to private power producers. As a result, the electricity market in Israel is still in the early stages of development. Furthermore, Israels energy consumption levels have increased in recent years and are expected to continue to increase in the near term. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, OPC had an installed capacity of 440 MW, representing approximately 3% of Israels installed capacity and 22% of the installed capacity of IPPs, and generated 6.9% of the gross energy generated (in GWh) in Israel. As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015, OPC represented 25% of our Adjusted EBITDA, 30% of our net income, and 17% of our installed capacity. We believe that OPCs plant provides us with a strategic advantage as an early entrant in the Israeli electricity market. Additionally, given Israels growing economy and the advanced age of its existing state-owned power generation facilities, we believe that OPC provides us with the know-how required for, visibility of, and opportunity to participate in, additional power projects in Israel, which may become increasingly available to private sector participants such as ourselves.
3
Our Portfolio of Generation Assets
The following table sets forth summary operational information regarding each of our operating companies as of June 30, 2015 by segment :
Segment |
Country |
Entity |
Ownership
|
Fuel |
Installed
|
Proportionate
|
Type of Asset |
Weighted
|
LTM
(GWh) 3 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Peru |
Peru | Kallpa | 75 | % | Natural Gas | 1,063 | 797 | Greenfield 4 | 7 | 6,154 | ||||||||||||||||||
Israel |
Israel | OPC | 80 | % | Natural Gas and Diesel | 440 | 352 | Greenfield | 8 | 5 | 3,976 | |||||||||||||||||
Central America |
Nicaragua | Corinto | 65 | % |
HFO |
71 | 46 | Acquired | 4 | 442 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nicaragua | Tipitapa Power | 65 | % |
HFO |
51 | 33 | Acquired | 4 | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||
Nicaragua | Amayo I | 61 | % | Wind | 40 | 24 | Acquired | 9 | 179 | |||||||||||||||||||
Nicaragua | Amayo II | 61 | % | Wind | 23 | 14 | Acquired | 10 | 88 | |||||||||||||||||||
Guatemala | Puerto Quetzal | 100 | % |
HFO |
179 | 179 | Acquired | | 782 | |||||||||||||||||||
El Salvador | Nejapa | 100 | % |
HFO |
140 | 140 | Original Inkia Asset | 2 | 712 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other |
Bolivia | COBEE | 100 | % | Hydroelectric, Natural Gas | 228 | 228 | Original Inkia Asset | 2 | 269 | ||||||||||||||||||
Chile | Central Cardones | 87 | % | Diesel | 153 | 133 | Acquired | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Chile | Colmito | 100 | % | Natural Gas and Diesel | 58 | 58 | Acquired | 3 | 251 | |||||||||||||||||||
Dominican Republic | CEPP | 97 | % |
HFO |
67 | 65 | Original Inkia Asset | | 90 | |||||||||||||||||||
Jamaica | JPPC | 100 | % |
HFO |
60 | 60 | Original Inkia Asset | 3 | 412 | |||||||||||||||||||
Colombia | Surpetroil | 60 | % | Natural Gas | 15 | 9 | Acquired | 1 | 49 | |||||||||||||||||||
Panama | Pedregal 6 | 21 | % 7 |
HFO |
54 | 11 | Original Inkia Asset | 2 | 258 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Operating Capacity | 2,642 | 2,149 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
1. | Reflects 100% of the capacity of each of our assets, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
2. | Reflects the proportionate capacity of each of our assets, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
3. | Reflects energy sales under PPAs for the 12 months ended June 30, 2015. |
4. | Kallpas plants were developed as greenfield projects in four different stages between 2005 and 2012, resulting in 870 MW of installed capacity. In addition, Kallpa acquired Las Flores power plant in 2014, adding 193 MW to Kallpas capacity. |
5. | Reflects the weighted average remaining life of OPCs PPAs with end users based on OPCs firm capacity. The IEC PPA (as defined below), which extends for an 18-year term and covers OPCs entire firm capacity, provides OPC with the option to allocate and sell the generated electricity of the power station directly to end users. OPC has exercised this option and sells all of its energy and capacity directly to 23 end users, as of June 30, 2015 (22 end users as of December 31, 2014). For further information on the IEC PPA, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Israeli Electricity Sector. |
6. | Although Pedregal is located in Central America, it is a minority investment. Therefore, from an income statement perspective, it is not part of the Central America segment and Pedregal is only reflected in our share in income of associated companies. |
7. | Although we have a non-controlling interest in Pedregal, we are party to a management services agreement, which designates us as the administrator responsible for the day-to-day management of Pedregal. |
4
The following table sets forth summary operational information regarding each of our assets in advanced stages of construction:
1. | Reflects 100% of the expected capacity of each asset regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns the asset. |
2. | Reflects the proportionate capacity of each of our assets, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
3. | When fueled by natural gas, the Samay I plant will have an installed capacity of approximately 720 MW. |
4. | Includes $40 million of intercompany expenses relating to Puerto Quetzals and CEPPs sale of the barges to Kanan. |
Since 2008, we have increased our installed capacity at a CAGR of 24%, and we expect our installed capacity to grow at a CAGR of 21% over the next two years as a result of the anticipated completion of assets which are currently in advanced stages of construction.
The following chart presents the growth of our installed capacity by year from 2008 through 2014, and the expected growth of our installed capacity resulting from the completion of our assets in advanced stages of construction and assuming no other changes to our capacity during this period. By the middle of 2016, we will have derived 76% of our installed capacity growth since 2007 from our greenfield development efforts (based upon our current portfolio and assuming the completion of our assets in advanced stages of construction).
Installed Capacity (MW)
1. | Figures for 2008 and 2009 reflect Inkias capacity. |
2. | Expected Kanan capacity. |
3. | Expected Kanan, CDA and Samay I capacity. |
5
The following table sets forth certain consolidated financial and operational data as of the dates and for the periods set forth below:
Six Months
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales from continuing operations |
$ | 655 | $ | 661 | $ | 1,372 | $ | 873 | $ | 576 | ||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
39 | 72 | 140 | 53 | 37 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
43 | 79 | 268 | 81 | 66 | |||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA 1 |
175 | 168 | 395 | 247 | 154 | |||||||||||||||
Installed capacity at end of period (in MW) 2 |
2,642 | 2,463 | 2,642 | 2,070 | 1,572 | |||||||||||||||
Proportionate capacity at end of period (in MW) 3 |
2,149 | 1,929 | 2,108 | 1,608 | 1,198 |
1. | Adjusted EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure. For a reconciliation of our net income to our Adjusted EBITDA, see Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Information . |
2. | Reflects 100% of the capacity of each of our assets, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
3. | Reflects the proportionate capacity of each of our assets, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
Potential Projects
We are constantly monitoring and considering development and acquisition opportunities and are currently assessing 30 projects in Israel and various Latin American countries, such as Chile, Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Panama, the Dominican Republic, and Nicaragua. These potential projects range in size from small-scale power facilities ( e.g. , less than 40 MW) to large-scale power facilities ( e.g. , approximately 550 MW) and utilize different fuels and technologies, including natural gas, hydroelectric, wind, and stranded gas. In some instances, we have acquired land, secured necessary licenses or rights, including temporary concessions and water rights, commissioned studies, made bids, or initiated similar actions, in connection with our assessment of the viability of the relevant project. We are also considering acquiring companies and assets in power generation and related businesses ( e.g. , transmission and distribution companies or assets).
In addition to the Latin American opportunities that we are currently considering, we also monitor opportunities in other markets. For example, in August 2015, we acquired 100% of the shares of Advanced Integrated Energy Ltd., or AIE, for NIS 60 million (approximately $16 million). AIE holds a provisional license for the construction of a 120 MW cogeneration power station in Israel and will seek regulatory approval for licenses in respect of an additional 25 MW. Based upon our initial assessment, we expect that the total cost of completing the construction of the AIE plant (including the consideration for the acquisition of AIE) will be approximately $200 million. The AIE plant is expected to reach its COD in the second half of 2018.
6
Set forth below is a map summarizing certain of the markets and projects that we have identified for potential expansion. Development projects imply a high degree of uncertainty, and there is no guarantee that we will proceed with these projects. Ultimately, notwithstanding the number of opportunities that we may consider over the long- and short-terms, we will only pursue those projects that we believe will generate attractive, risk-adjusted returns over the long-term and which we believe we have the management capacity to build and operate. Numerous conditions will need to be met before we can develop or acquire any of the projects listed below. The summary below sets forth projects developed and owned by us, as well as projects owned by third parties, that we may be able to acquire by direct negotiations or through tender processes. This summary is not exhaustive, is only provided to show projects which we are evaluating, and should not serve as an indication of any expectation regarding any final outcome.
Competitive Strengths
Strong track record in disciplined project development and obtaining financing We leverage our core competenciesproject identification, evaluation, development, construction and operationto develop power generation facilities using various technologies in attractive markets that typically have relatively high GDP growth rates and relatively low levels of per capita energy consumption. For example, in 2012, we completed our third expansion of Kallpa Generación S.A.s, or Kallpas, gas-powered plant, which is the largest power generation facility in Peru in terms of capacity, by converting it into a combined cycle facility and thereby adding 292 additional MW to the facilitys capacity. This expansion was completed on time and below budget. Additionally, in 2013, OPC became the first IPP in Israel when we completed the construction of its 440 MW combined cycle power plant.
7
Our projects have been developed with a disciplined capital structure, which reflects our commitment to develop projects in accordance with three key fundamental principles. First, we endeavor to construct projects by entering into turnkey engineering, procurement and construction, or EPC, agreements that define the total project cost and transfer most of the risks of construction delays and cost overruns to our EPC contractors. We currently have assets in advanced stages of construction with an expected aggregate installed capacity of 1,202 MW, 1,110 MW of which is being constructed pursuant to EPC contracts. Second, we seek to secure a revenue stream prior to the construction of our plants by sourcing and entering into long-term PPAs, which provide our development projects with verifiable projected margins and cash flows, before construction has commenced. Finally, we leverage our EPC contracts and PPAs to secure long-term project financing agreements which are generally stand-alone, secured, project-specific, and with no or limited recourse. Over the course of our history, we have secured different types of financings ( e.g. , leases, local and international bonds, syndicated loans, etc.) during times of changing financial markets and in connection with our construction of various projects using a range of fuels.
Long-term PPAs and supply agreements that limit exposure to market fluctuations Our operating subsidiaries typically enter into long-term PPAs, which generally limits their exposure to fluctuations in energy spot market rates, generates stable and predictable margins, and helps to create stability and predictability in our cash flows. In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, we made 88% and 92%, respectively, of our aggregate energy sales (in GWh) pursuant to long-term PPAs. As of June 30, 2015, the weighted average remaining life of our PPAs was 10 years (including the remaining life of the PPAs for our assets in advanced stages of construction) and we have historically sought, and will continue to seek, to renew our long-term PPAs as they expire.
As of June 30, 2015, the majority of our PPAs were indexed to the price of the corresponding power plants operating fuel prices in U.S. Dollars. Additionally, as of June 30, 2015, many of our PPAs provided for payment in, or were linked to, the U.S. Dollar, thereby limiting our exposure to fuel price and exchange rate fluctuations. Additionally, the counterparties to our long-term PPAs are typically large local distribution companies or non-regulated customers, including subsidiaries of large multi-national corporations, which we believe have strong credit profiles, mitigating the risk of customer default. Some of our major customers within Peru and Israel include Southern Peru Copper Corporation, Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A., a subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan, Compañía Minera Antapaccay S.A., a subsidiary of Glencore Xstrata, and Oil Refineries Limited, as well as governments and quasi-governmental entities.
As our power facilities utilize and are dependent upon natural gas, hydroelectric, HFO, diesel, wind, or a combination of these energy sources, we generally seek to enter into long-term supply and transportation agreements to acquire the necessary fuel for our facilities. For example, Kallpa and OPC, which own and operate our largest plants, are party to long-term supply agreements, including natural gas supply agreements and transportation services agreements, that are material to their operations.
Attractive footprint in high growth markets Currently, our principal focus is on Latin American markets, which typically have higher rates of growth of GDP and lower overall and per capita energy consumption, as compared with more developed markets. We expect continued growth in these key markets, providing us with the opportunity to generate attractive, risk-adjusted returns through additional investments in power generation assets in those countries.
We are a leader in our largest market, Peru, one of the fastest growing economies in Latin America, with an average GDP growth of approximately 5.8% per year from 2009 through 2014, according to the International Monetary Fund, a mature regulatory framework, and a well-run power system. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, our operating company in Peru had an installed capacity of 1,063 MW, representing 12.2% of Perus installed capacity, and generated 14.2% of the gross energy generated (in GWh) in Peru. Our operating company in Peru represented 45% of our Adjusted EBITDA, 51% of our net income, and 40% of our installed
8
capacity as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Additionally, our assets in advanced stages of construction in Peru are expected to provide an additional 1,110 MW in installed capacity to address the expected increase in Peruvian energy demand, which is expected to result, in part, from the substantial investments made in connection with Perus energy-intensive mining industry and expected growth in its manufacturing industry.
We also operate OPC, the first IPP in Israel, which, following decades of state control, recently opened its electricity market to private power producers. As a result, the electricity market in Israel is still in the early stages of development. Furthermore, Israels energy consumption levels have increased in recent years and are expected to continue to increase in the near-term. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, OPC had an installed capacity of 440 MW, representing approximately 3% of Israels installed capacity and 22% of the installed capacity of IPPs, and generated 6.9% of the gross energy generated (in GWh) in Israel. As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015, OPC represented 25% of our Adjusted EBITDA, 30% of our net income, and 17% of our installed capacity. We believe that OPCs plant provides us with a strategic advantage as an early entrant in the Israeli electricity market. Additionally, given Israels growing economy and the advanced age of its existing state-owned power generation facilities, we believe OPC provides us with the know-how required for, visibility of, and opportunity to participate in, additional power projects in Israel, which may become increasingly available to private sector participants such as ourselves.
In addition to our attractive position in Peru and Israel, we have also developed an attractive footprint in several markets in Latin America, including Chile and Colombia. We believe that our current platform, coupled with our agile and disciplined decision-making process, enables us to take advantage of opportunities as they arise.
Established and disciplined track record in making acquisitions We have acquired numerous generation assets since 2007, resulting in the expansion of our operations by 783 MW (641 MW on a proportionate basis) in five countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. We believe our recognition as a regional generator and developer with a relatively strong balance sheet, and our ability to act quickly with respect to acquisitions, has complemented our development capabilities by allowing us to strategically source and execute acquisitions. Furthermore, we have the ability to manage projects that are too small for large companies, as well as projects that are too large for small companies. Our acquisition of Central Cardones in 2011, for example, provided us with an initial footprint in Chile, a dynamic and important power market, and facilitated our acquisition of Colmito in October 2013. Similarly, our acquisition of certain Nicaraguan assets in 2014, representing 185 MW of installed capacity (117 MW on a proportionate basis) provided us with an entry into the Nicaraguan market and diversified our portfolio with operational wind generation assets. Additionally, in August 2015, we acquired 100% of the shares of AIE, which holds a provisional license for the construction of a 120 MW cogeneration power station, and will seek regulatory approval for licenses in respect of an additional 25 MW, in Israel, a new and growing private electricity generation market.
Driving operational excellence through partnerships with leading OEMs and reliance on efficient technologies We seek to optimize our power generation capacity by using leading technologies ( e.g. , turbines manufactured by Siemens, General Electric, Mitsubishi and Andritz) and entering into long-term service agreements with leading, multi-national original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs. Our technologies and long-term partnerships enable our power generation assets to perform more efficiently and at relatively high levels of reliability. Additionally, our experienced staff is committed to increasing our operating performance and ensuring the disciplined maintenance of our power generation assets. We believe that our generation plants weighted average availability rate of 94% for both the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 was the result of our optimization efforts and commitment to improving our operating efficiency and performance.
Additionally, our acquisition or construction of power generation assets that use efficient technologies ( e.g ., the conversion of Kallpas facility into a combined cycle operation in 2012) places our generation assets competitively in the dispatch merit order in certain of the countries in which we operate. For example, Kallpas
9
facility, a base load plant and combined cycle gas turbine, is among the first power plants to be dispatched, due to its efficiency and competitiveness in the dispatch stack. Similarly, CDAs plant, as a hydroelectric power plant, will also be among the first power plants to be dispatched in Peru once it reaches its COD in 2016. Having a portfolio which includes efficient power plants with lower production costs allows us to potentially earn higher margins than companies that utilize certain other competing technologies in their plants and are therefore less competitive in the dispatch merit order.
Experienced management team with strong local presence Our management team has extensive experience in the power generation business. Our executive officers have an average of approximately 20 years of experience in the power generation industry, and significant portions of our core management team have been working together in international large power generation companies since 1996. We believe that this overall level of experience contributes to our ability to effectively manage our existing operating companies and to identify, evaluate and integrate high-quality growth opportunities within and outside Latin America. Furthermore, our hands-on management team utilizes a lean decision-making process, which allows us to quickly take advantage of strategic acquisitions and potential developments and opportunities as they materialize. Our managers are compensated, in part, on the basis of our financial performance, which incentivizes them to continue to improve our operating results. Additionally, our local management teams provide in-depth market knowledge and power industry experience. These teams consist primarily of local executives with significant experience in the local energy industry and with local government regulators. We believe that the market-specific experience of our local management provides us with insight into the local regulatory, political and business environment in each of the countries in which we operate.
Strong and dedicated shareholder with experience operating growth-oriented businesses and a long-term commitment to our growth Our shareholder owns businesses, in whole or in part, ranging from established, cash generating businesses to early stage development companies. The international profile, experience and commitment of our shareholder in operating growth-oriented businesses, lends us credibility in conducting our operations and project development, particularly with respect to large national and international companies, such as our customers, and international financial institutions which are an important source of financing for our assets. Upon completion of this offering, Kenon (NYSE: KEN; TASE: KEN) will remain our controlling shareholder. Kenon was formed in 2014 to serve as the holding company of various dynamic, primarily growth-oriented businesses, including IC Power, which were contributed to Kenon by its former parent, IC, in a spin-off completed in January 2015.
Business Strategy
Continue to successfully develop greenfield assets in attractive markets One of our core competencies is identifying, evaluating, constructing, and operating greenfield development projects in our target markets. We will continue to seek to develop power generation assets in countries with relatively stable, growing economies, low levels of per capita energy consumption or developing private energy generation markets. We also seek to develop assets that can be expanded through further investment, or as additional fuels become available, which provides us with the ability to further develop an asset and increase its installed capacity in connection with market trends, industry developments, or changing fuel availability.
We place particular focus on our ability to complete the development of our greenfield projects on time and within budget and will continue to use extensive project planning and contracting mechanisms to minimize our development risk. For example, in connection with our development activities, we typically enter into lump-sum, turnkey EPC contracts to minimize our construction risks and mitigate construction cost overruns, while also entering into long-term PPAs to generate stable and predictable margins and cash flows; we believe this combination facilitates our access to construction financing. Engaging in such practices has allowed us to successfully complete several thermal generation projects, including the Kallpa facility, our largest development
10
to date. Additionally, our first hydroelectric development, CDAs plant, is expected to be fully operational at a cost of $1.9 million per MW, making CDAs plant among the most efficiently constructed hydroelectric facilities in Latin America in terms of cost per MW.
Optimize portfolio to maximize returns while minimizing risk We regularly assess our portfolio of operating companies and employ disciplined portfolio management principles to optimize our operations in light of changing industry dynamics in a particular country or region, create financing flexibility and address specific risk management and exposure concerns. Our strategy is to optimize the composition of our portfolio by focusing on profitable developments and acquisitions within key power generation markets typically in Latin America, the Caribbean and Israel.
For example, prior to our 2014 acquisition of the Las Flores facility, a 193 MW thermal power generation plant (representing 145 MW on a proportionate basis), Las Flores had operated intermittently due to the lack of a long-term regular supply of natural gas. The Kallpa facility, which is located near the Las Flores plant, had an excess supply of natural gas. We identified these and other potential synergies and, since our acquisition of the Las Flores facility, have been able to significantly improve the operations and generation activities of Las Flores plant, while also maximizing the use of the Kallpa facilitys natural gas supply and transportation capabilities. Our recent acquisition of Puerto Quetzal Power (PQP) Company, or Puerto Quetzal, serves as another example of our portfolio optimization efforts. In addition to providing us with an attractive entry point into the Guatemalan market, one of the barges we acquired from Puerto Quetzal was recently redeployed to Panama to allow Kanan to take advantage of a short-term supply shortfall in the Panamanian power market. Additionally, in 2014, we divested our 21% indirect equity interest in Edegel S.A.A., or Edegel, one of Perus largest power generation companies. While the Edegel investment was a strong cash flow generator which helped to fund the initial stages of our growth, we opted to sell this investment in order to redeploy the proceeds from such sale into projects in which we have a majority control and which we believe will have a better risk and return profile for our shareholders over the long term.
Complement our organic development with dynamic and disciplined acquisitions We seek to invest in countries and/or assets where we can significantly increase our cash flows and optimize our operations. Therefore, in addition to greenfield developments, we also seek to enter into and/or expand our presence in attractive markets by acquiring controlling interests in operating assets to anchor our geographical expansion. For example, we recently acquired power generation assets in Nicaragua, Guatemala and Colombia, which represent our initial entry into these markets, through our acquisitions of (1) IC Power Nicaragua Holding, or ICPNH, which provided us with controlling interests in two HFO and two wind energy Nicaraguan generation companies, (2) Puerto Quetzal, which provided us with three power barges with HFO generators (one of which was recently transferred to our subsidiary Kanan to allow it to take advantage of supply shortfalls in the Panamanian power market), and (3) Surpetroil S.A.S., or Surpetroil, a company that utilizes stranded natural gas reserves in its production of energy. Chile and Colombia represent important parts of our growth strategy. We continue to seek expansion in Chile and Colombia, and we expect that our assets in these countries will provide us with the initial footprint from which to carry out our organic development strategy in these two markets. Additionally, consistent with our strategy of maintaining controlling interests in our power generation assets, in May 2014, we increased our equity ownership in Jamaica Private Power Company Ltd., or JPPC, (which has an aggregate 60 MW of installed capacity in two HFO generation units in Jamaica) from 16% to 100%, and in January 2015, we increased our equity ownership in Nejapa Power Company L.L.C., or Nejapa, (which has 140 MW of installed capacity at an HFO power generation facility in El Salvador) from 71% to 100%. We will continue to seek to leverage our acquisitions of assets in new markets and/or of assets utilizing a broad range of technologies (which may include new fuels, such as solar power) to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns.
11
Continue to enter into long-term PPAs with credit-worthy counterparties In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, we made 88% and 92%, respectively, of our aggregate energy sales (in GWh) pursuant to PPAs, many of which are denominated in, or linked to, the U.S. Dollar. Our strategy of generating strong and predictable cash flows from long-term PPAs has enabled us to successfully secure financing for our greenfield projects from a diverse international lender base. We seek to enter into long-term capacity PPAs prior to committing to a new project so as to accurately determine expected cash flows and margins of a particular asset, which facilitates its financing. For example, although the CDA plant is yet to reach its COD, CDA has sourced and entered into two long-term PPAs beginning in 2016 and 2018 for a significant portion of its expected capacity, contracting most of the estimated firm energy it expects to generate between 2018 and 2027. The expected cash flows associated with such PPAs contributed to CDAs attractive credit profile, which supported the financing of CDAs plants development. Similarly, the Peruvian government has guaranteed capacity payments for 600 MW of the expected capacity of Samay Is plant for a 20-year period at rates above regulated capacity rates, which also provided support for the financing of the plants development. In addition to significantly improving our access to financing with no or limited recourse, our strategy of contracting our assets energy and capacity significantly reduces our exposure to changes in spot prices.
Risk Factors
Investing in our ordinary shares involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described in Risk Factors before making a decision to invest in our ordinary shares. If any of these risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our ordinary shares would likely decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The following is a summary of some of the principal risks we face:
| risks related to our capital commitments and/or intentions with respect to certain of our operating businesses, including the sufficiency of our liquidity and capital resources in the near-term; |
| risks related to the expansion, construction, development, or acquisition, as applicable, of power companies or assets; |
| risks related to the expected timing, completion, and terms of certain acquisitions, including the assignment of certain supply and/or transmission agreements; |
| an inability to source, enter into and/or renew long-term PPAs and EPC agreements and the amounts to be paid under such agreements; |
| an inability to renew and/or enter into supply, transmission and/or distribution agreements on competitive terms, as such agreements expire; |
| risks related to expected trends in the countries in which each of our businesses operate, including trends relating to the growth of a particular market, supply and demand imbalances, investments in power generation facilities, and the availability and prices of natural gas and other fuels; |
| an inability to respond appropriately, or effectively index our sales prices or expenses, to volatility in commodity prices; |
| an inability to secure raw materials, including fuel, to operate our power generation plants; |
| risks related to the impact of the decline of crude oil prices on our sales or Adjusted EBITDA; |
| risks related to expected or potential changes in tariffs, which may impact our revenues or Adjusted EBITDA; |
12
| risks related to variations in weather, the occurrence of certain hydrological conditions in respect of our hydropower and thermal plants, as well as hurricanes and other storms and disasters, and low levels of wind for our wind facilities; |
| risks related to competition from other companies serving our end markets; |
| risks related to our counterparties, including risks related to our counterparties financial credit, performance risks; |
| increased governmental regulation of our business, industry or the business and industries of our customers and suppliers; |
| new types of taxes, increases or decreases in taxes, our tax position, or the tax position of our businesses; |
| economic and political unrest in the countries in which we operate; |
| the potential expropriation or nationalization of our operating assets by foreign governments, with or without adequate compensation; and |
| risks related to our ability to distribute dividends to our shareholders. |
Company History, Structure and Reorganization
IC Power was incorporated under the laws of Singapore in May 2015 under the name IC Power Pte. Ltd., pursuant to the Companies Act, Chapter 50 of Singapore, or the Singapore Companies Act, to serve as the holding company of ICP and its businesses, which shall be contributed to us by our parent, Kenon, prior to the completion of this offering, through the Reorganization described in further detail in Corporate Formation and Reorganization . Additionally, prior to the completion of this offering, we will be converted into a Singapore public company limited by shares and renamed . Our Singapore company registration number is 201511865D. Until the completion of this offering, we will remain a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kenon, which was formed by IC in 2014 to serve as the holding company of certain interests, including ICP, received by Kenon in connection with ICs January 2015 spin-off of Kenon to ICs shareholders.
The graphic below illustrates our corporate structure prior to, and immediately after, the completion of the Reorganization and the completion of the offering.
Prior to the Completion of the Reorganization and the Offering
|
After the Completion of the Reorganization and the Offering
|
|
|
|
Our registered address is 80 Raffles Place #26-01, UOB Plaza, Singapore 048624. Our principal executive office is located at 1 Temasek Avenue #36-01, Millenia Tower, Singapore 039192 and our telephone number at this address is +65 6351 1780.
13
Issuer |
IC Power Pte. Ltd., a newly-formed holding company which will receive the outstanding equity interests of ICP. Prior to the completion of this offering, we will be converted into a Singapore public company limited by shares and renamed . |
Underwriters |
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Goldman, Sachs & Co., UBS Securities LLC, HSBC Securities (USA) Inc., Scotia Capital (USA) Inc., and Credicorp Capital Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A. |
Public offering price |
We currently expect that the initial public offering price will be between $ and $ per ordinary share. |
Ordinary shares being offered |
ordinary shares. |
Ordinary shares outstanding before this offering |
ordinary shares. |
Ordinary shares outstanding immediately after this offering |
ordinary shares ( ordinary shares if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional ordinary shares from us). |
Underwriters purchase option |
We have granted an option to the underwriters, exercisable for 30 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to an additional ordinary shares, at the initial public offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus, less the underwriting discount. |
Listing |
We are in the process of applying for the listing of our ordinary shares on the NYSE under the ticker symbol ICP. |
Use of proceeds |
Assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, we estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of shares of our ordinary shares in this offering will be approximately $ million (or $ million if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional ordinary shares from us), after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses. |
We intend to use the net proceeds that we receive in this offering, along with readily available cash: |
| to develop greenfield projects; |
| to acquire companies or assets in the electricity sector ( e.g. , generation, transmission or distribution companies or assets); |
|
to prepay in full all obligations under our note payable to Kenon (which will be in an aggregate principal amount of $220 million), which note will be issued to Kenon as part of the consideration for Kenons contribution of ICP to us in connection with the Reorganization, will bear interest at a |
14
rate of LIBOR +6% per annum from the earlier of June 30, 2016 or 21 days after the completion of this offering, and will mature, unless otherwise prepaid, on December 31, 2016; and |
| for general corporate purposes. |
Except as specified above, we are unable to estimate the amount of the net proceeds from this offering that will be used for any of the purposes described above. Accordingly, we will have broad discretion in the way that we use the net proceeds of this offering. For further information on our Use of Proceeds, see Use of Proceeds . For further information on the greenfield development and acquisition opportunities under current assessment and the status of our development efforts, see BusinessPotential Projects . |
Payment and settlement |
Our ordinary shares are expected to be delivered against payment on , 2015. |
Voting rights |
We will have only one class of issued and outstanding ordinary shares, which have identical rights in all respects (including voting rights) and rank equally with one another. For further information on our ordinary shares, see Description of Share Capital . |
Dividend policy |
From time to time, our board of directors may approve the payment of dividends to our shareholders. The declaration and payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including our profits, our financial position, earnings, cash flows, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, the progress relating to our strategy plan, statutory and contractual restrictions applicable to the payment of dividends, the conditions prevailing in the market, our overall financial condition, available distributable reserves, and additional factors our board of directors deems appropriate. For further information on our dividend policy, see Dividend Policy and for further information on the risks related to our dividend policy and our ability to declare dividends to our shareholders, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our Ordinary Shares and this OfferingAs a newly-incorporated company , we will not have distributable profits to pay dividends . |
Lock-up agreements |
Subject to certain exceptions, we, our executive officers and directors and Kenon, our controlling shareholder, collectively holding all of our ordinary shares outstanding immediately prior to this offering have entered into lock-up agreements with Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC for a period of 180 days after the date of this prospectus. For further information on these lock-up agreements, see UnderwritingNo Sales of Similar Securities . |
Material tax considerations |
For a description of certain U.S. federal income tax considerations of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares, see TaxationU.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations . |
15
For a summary of Singapore income tax, goods and services tax and stamp duty considerations relevant to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares, see TaxationMaterial Singapore Tax Considerations . |
Risk factors |
See Risk Factors included elsewhere in this prospectus for a discussion of factors you should carefully consider before deciding to invest in our ordinary shares. |
We base the number of ordinary shares outstanding following the completion of this offering on the number of ordinary shares outstanding as of the date of this prospectus.
16
SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
The following tables present our summary consolidated financial information and operating statistics. The summary consolidated financial information as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 and for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 have been derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus, in each case including all adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for these periods. The summary consolidated financial information as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus, and the consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto which are not included in this prospectus. Our historical results for any prior period are not necessarily indicative of results expected in any future period. Additionally, the summary consolidated interim financial and operating information as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 or for any period subsequent to June 30, 2015.
You should read the summary consolidated financial and operating information set forth below in conjunction with the sections entitled Use of Proceeds, Capitalization, Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Information, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations as well as in conjunction with our consolidated and condensed consolidated interim financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. Except as otherwise indicated, or unless the context requires otherwise, references to the Company, we, us and our in this section shall refer to ICP and its businesses.
The following table presents our summary consolidated statement of income information for the periods presented:
Six Months Ended
|
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 1 |
2014 1 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary Consolidated Statements of Income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations Information |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 655 | $ | 661 | $ | 1,372 | $ | 873 | $ | 576 | $ | 526 | $ | 305 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
(458 | ) | (468 | ) | (936 | ) | (594 | ) | (396 | ) | (377 | ) | (218 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(54 | ) | (48 | ) | (101 | ) | (72 | ) | (51 | ) | (38 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
143 | 145 | 335 | 207 | 129 | 111 | 61 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(31 | ) | (30 | ) | (68 | ) | (41 | ) | (37 | ) | (32 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Asset write-off |
| | (35 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| 48 | 68 | 1 | | 24 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
| 3 | 3 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (12 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
2 | 3 | 17 | 5 | 7 | | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating income |
113 | 168 | 308 | 172 | 99 | 103 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
53 | 67 | 119 | 80 | 44 | 36 | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
60 | 103 | 191 | 94 | 57 | 69 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(21 | ) | (31 | ) | (51 | ) | (41 | ) | (20 | ) | (16 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
39 | 72 | 140 | 53 | 37 | 53 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations 3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
4 | 7 | 128 | 28 | 29 | 20 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
$ | 43 | $ | 79 | $ | 268 | $ | 81 | $ | 66 | $ | 73 | $ | 36 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Six Months Ended
|
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 1 |
2014 1 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity holders of the Company |
33 | 66 | 236 | 66 | 57 | 60 | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
10 | 13 | 32 | 15 | 9 | 13 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares (in millions of shares) |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share |
3.3 | 6.6 | 23.6 | 6.6 | 5.7 | 6.0 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends per share |
| 3.7 | 3.7 | | | | |
1. | Restated and reclassified. See Note 3 to our unaudited financial statements included in this prospectus. |
2. | ICP was incorporated in January 2010. Financial data for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the consolidated results of Inkia and OPC from April 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively, the time of their transfer to ICP. |
3. | Reflects dividends received from Edegel post-equity method accounting and the results of Acter Holdings, which primarily consists of our proportionate share of Edegels results for the period. |
The following table presents our summary consolidated statement of financial position information as of the dates presented:
As of
|
As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 1 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Information |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 436 | $ | 583 | $ | 517 | $ | 184 | $ | 221 | $ | 114 | ||||||||||||
Short-term deposits and restricted cash |
185 | 208 | 9 | 81 | 171 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
174 | 181 | 138 | 96 | 75 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
947 | 1,089 | 724 | 416 | 536 | 266 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments in associated companies |
9 | 10 | 286 | 312 | 283 | 268 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
2,842 | 2,515 | 1,875 | 1,583 | 1,247 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
4,063 | 3,859 | 3,036 | 2,457 | 2,169 | 1,301 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term credit from banks and others |
158 | 162 | 244 | 80 | 81 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
147 | 144 | 92 | 42 | 57 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
454 | 452 | 451 | 172 | 217 | 110 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term loans from banks and others |
1,676 | 1,499 | 788 | 670 | 487 | 186 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans and capital notes from parent |
| | 242 | 237 | 219 | 207 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debentures |
680 | 687 | 637 | 516 | 525 | 185 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
3,002 | 2,828 | 2,237 | 1,709 | 1,546 | 761 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share capital and premium |
431 | 431 | 431 | 431 | 431 | 431 | ||||||||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
433 | 403 | 204 | 137 | 80 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total equity attributable to the equity holders of the Company |
852 | 815 | 653 | 619 | 550 | 473 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
210 | 216 | 146 | 129 | 72 | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total equity |
1,062 | 1,031 | 799 | 748 | 622 | 540 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 4,063 | $ | 3,859 | $ | 3,036 | $ | 2,457 | $ | 2,169 | $ | 1,301 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Restated and reclassified. See Note 3 to our audited financial statements included in this prospectus. |
18
The following table presents our summary consolidated cash flow information for the periods presented:
Six Months Ended June 30, |
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 1 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary Consolidated Cash Flow Information |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 131 | $ | 177 | $ | 413 | $ | 272 | $ | 122 | $ | 127 | $ | 65 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(341 | ) | (267 | ) | (378 | ) | (258 | ) | (293 | ) | (643 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(63 | ) | 90 | 47 | 320 | 132 | 623 | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(147 | ) | (180 | ) | 82 | 334 | (39 | ) | 107 | 114 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
583 | 517 | 517 | 184 | 221 | 114 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of changes in the exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents |
| 2 | (16 | ) | (1 | ) | 2 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
$ | 436 | $ | 339 | $ | 583 | $ | 517 | $ | 184 | $ | 221 | $ | 114 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Restated and reclassified. See Note 3 to our unaudited financial statements included in this prospectus. |
2. | ICP was incorporated in January 2010. Cash flow information for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the consolidated results of Inkia and OPC from April 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively, the time of their transfer to ICP. |
Key Financial and Other Operating Information
The following tables set forth certain key financial and operating information for the periods presented:
Six
|
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 1 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
39 | 72 | 140 | 53 | 37 | 53 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
43 | 79 | 268 | 81 | 66 | 73 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA 3 |
175 | 168 | 395 | 247 | 154 | 120 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net debt 4 |
1,893 | 1,629 | 1,557 | 1,143 | 1,001 | 701 | 285 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Installed capacity of operating companies and associated companies at end of period (MW) |
2,642 | 2,463 | 2,642 | 2,070 | 1,572 | 1,280 | 1,127 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proportionate capacity of operating companies and associated companies at end of period (MW) |
2,149 | 1,929 | 2,108 | 1,608 | 1,198 | 979 | 846 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average availability during the period (%) |
94 | % | 97 | % | 94 | % | 94 | % | 93 | % | 91 | % | 94 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross energy generated (GWh) |
6,020 | 6,714 | 13,156 | 8,820 | 6,339 | 6,011 | 5,135 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Energy sold under PPAs (GWh) |
6,883 | 7,377 | 14,220 | 9,217 | 5,365 | 5,212 | 4,626 |
1. | Restated and reclassified. See Note 3 to our unaudited financial statements included in this prospectus. |
2. | ICP was incorporated in January 2010. Financial data for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the consolidated results of Inkia and OPC from April 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively, the time of their transfer to ICP. |
19
3. | We define Adjusted EBITDA as for each period as net income for the period before depreciation and amortization, finance expenses, net, income tax expense and asset write-off, excluding share in income of associated companies, recognized negative goodwill, capital gains (excluding capital gains from sales of fixed assets), and net income from discontinued operations, net of tax, excluding dividends received from discontinued operations. |
Adjusted EBITDA is not recognized under IFRS or any other generally accepted accounting principles as a measure of financial performance and should not be considered as a substitute for net income or loss, cash flow from operations or other measures of operating performance or liquidity determined in accordance with IFRS. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent funds available for dividends or other discretionary uses because those funds may be required for debt service, capital expenditures, working capital and other commitments and contingencies. Adjusted EBITDA presents limitations that impair its use as a measure of our profitability since it does not take into consideration certain costs and expenses that result from our business that could have a significant effect on our net income, such as finance expenses, taxes and depreciation.
The following table sets forth a reconciliation of our net income to our Adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented. Other companies may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently, and therefore this presentation of Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures used by other companies:
Six Months Ended
|
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 (i) |
2009 (ii) |
2008 (ii) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) for the period |
$ | 43 | $ | 79 | $ | 268 | $ | 81 | $ | 66 | $ | 73 | $ | 36 | $ | 66 | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (iii) |
58 | 51 | 108 | 76 | 55 | 41 | 28 | 26 | 20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
53 | 67 | 119 | 80 | 44 | 36 | 24 | 18 | 27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
21 | 31 | 51 | 41 | 20 | 16 | 6 | 8 | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset write-off |
| | 35 | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share in income (loss) of associated companies |
| (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Recognized negative goodwill |
| (51 | ) (iv) | (71 | ) (v) | (1 | ) | | (24 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital gains |
| | | | | | | (35 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, excluding dividends received from discontinued operations |
| (vi) | (7 | ) | (113 | ) (vii) | (28 | ) | (29 | ) | (20 | ) | (11 | ) | (17 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 175 | $ | 168 | $ | 395 | $ | 247 | $ | 154 | $ | 120 | $ | 82 | $ | 65 | $ | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | ICP was incorporated in January 2010. Financial data for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the consolidated results of Inkia and OPC from April 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively, the time of their transfer to ICP. |
(ii) | ICP was incorporated in January 2010. Results for 2008 and 2009 are the results of Inkia. |
(iii) | Includes depreciation and amortization expenses from cost of sales and general, selling and administrative expenses. |
(iv) | Includes $48 million of income from recognized negative goodwill and $3 million of income from the measurement of fair value. |
(v) | Includes $68 million of income from recognized negative goodwill and $3 million of income from the measurement of fair value. |
(vi) | Excludes $4 million received from Edegel post-equity method accounting, which is reflected as other income in our discontinued operations for that period, but is included in net income (loss) for the period, so is therefore included in Adjusted EBITDA for the period. |
(vii) | Excludes $15 million received from Edegel post-equity method accounting, which is reflected as other income in our discontinued operations for that period, but is included in net income (loss) for the period, so is therefore included in Adjusted EBITDA for the period. |
20
4. | Net debt is calculated as total debt, excluding debt owed to our parent, minus cash and short term deposits and restricted cash. Net debt is not a measure recognized under IFRS. The table below sets forth a reconciliation of our total debt to net debt. |
As of June 30, | As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt (i) |
$ | 2,514 | $ | 2,035 | $ | 2,348 | $ | 1,669 | $ | 1,266 | $ | 1,093 | $ | 417 | ||||||||||||||
Cash (ii) |
621 | 406 | 791 | 526 | 265 | 392 | 132 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net debt |
$ | 1,893 | $ | 1,629 | $ | 1,557 | $ | 1,143 | $ | 1,001 | $ | 701 | $ | 285 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Total debt comprises loans from banks and third parties and debentures, excluding liabilities of disposal group classified as held for sale and loans owed to our parent, and includes long term and short term debt. |
(ii) | Includes short-term deposits and restricted cash of $185 million and $69 million at June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $208 million, $9 million, $81 million, $171 million and $18 million at December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. |
Information by Segment
Set forth below is a summary of the key financial metrics of each of our segments for the periods set forth below:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Total |
|
Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
225 | 157 | 175 | 98 | 655 | 225 | 202 | 136 | 98 | 661 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(139 | ) | (112 | ) | (140 | ) | (67 | ) | (459 | ) | (145 | ) | (141 | ) | (113 | ) | (69 | ) | (468 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
53 | 31 | 19 | 5 | 113 | 53 | 44 | 12 | 54 | 168 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating margins |
24 | % | 20 | % | 11 | % | 9 | % | 17 | % | 24 | % | 22 | % | 9 | % | 55 | % | 25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(20 | ) | (13 | ) | (5 | ) | (15 | ) | 53 | (17 | ) | (15 | ) | (3 | ) | (32 | ) | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) for the period |
22 | 13 | 11 | (7 | ) |
|
43 |
|
24 | 21 | 7 | 23 |
|
79 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Installed capacity of operating companies and associated companies at end of period (MW) |
1,063 | 440 | 504 | 635 |
|
2,642 |
|
1,063 | 440 | 325 | 635 | 2,463 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportionate capacity of operating companies at end of period (MW) |
797 |
|
352
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
2,149
|
|
797 | 352 | 216 | 564 | 1,929 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross energy generated (GWh) |
1,928 | 1,937 | 1,123 | 1,032 |
|
6,020 |
|
2,931 | 1,867 | 1,012 | 904 |
|
6,714 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy sold under PPAs (GWh) |
3,191 | 1,965 | 1,235 | 492 |
|
6,883 |
|
3,361 | 1,962 | 1,404 | 650 |
|
7,377 |
|
21
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Total | Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
437 | 413 | 308 | 214 | 1,372 | 394 | 187 | 147 | 145 | 873 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(270 | ) | (252 | ) | (260 | ) | (154 | ) | (936 | ) | (239 | ) | (139 | ) | (127 | ) | (89 | ) | (594 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
108 | 127 | 21 | 43 | 308 | 101 | 31 | 7 | 23 | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating margins |
25 | % | 31 | % | 7 | % | 20 | % | 22 | % | 26 | % | 17 | % | 5 | % | 16 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
34 | 30 | 8 | 46 | 119 | 34 | 22 | | 23 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
57 | 71 | 9 | 124 | 268 | 42 | 7 | 5 | 20 | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Installed capacity of operating companies and associated companies at end of period (MW) |
1,063 | 440 | 504 | 635 | 2,642 | 870 | 440 | 140 | 620 | 2,070 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportionate capacity of operating companies at end of period (MW) |
797 | 352 | 395 | 564 | 2,108 | 652 | 352 | 99 | 505 | 1,608 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross energy generated (GWh) |
5,920 | 3,465 | 1,965 | 1,806 | 13,156 | 5,459 | 1,357 | 458 | 1,546 | 8,820 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy sold under PPAs (GWh) |
6,324 | 3,973 | 2,694 | 1,229 | 14,220 | 6,268 | 1,813 | 535 | 601 | 9,217 |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
276 | | 155 | 145 | 576 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(177 | ) | | (132 | ) | (87 | ) | (396 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
59 | (4 | ) | 11 | 24 | 99 | ||||||||||||||
Operating margins |
21 | % | | 7 | % | 17 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
17 | 4 | | 24 | 44 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) for the period |
32 | (6 | ) | 7 | 24 | 66 | ||||||||||||||
Installed capacity of operating companies and associated companies at end of period (MW) |
870 | | 140 | 562 | 1,572 | |||||||||||||||
Proportionate capacity of operating companies at end of period (MW) |
|
652
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
447
|
|
1,198 | |||||||||
Gross energy generated (GWh) |
4,282 | | 561 | 1,496 | 6,339 | |||||||||||||||
Energy sold under PPAs (GWh) |
4,321 | | 448 | 596 | 5,365 |
22
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity can suffer materially as a result of any of the risks described below. You should carefully consider the risks described below with all of the other information included in this prospectus. If any of the following risks actually occurs, it may materially harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. While we have described all of the risks we consider material, these risks are not the only ones we face. We are also subject to the same risks that affect many other companies, such as technological obsolescence, labor relations, geopolitical events, climate change and risks related to the conducting of international operations. Additional risks not known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. Additionally, this prospectus also contains forward-looking statements that involve additional risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks faced by us described below and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Risks Related to Our Business
Our results of operations and financial condition are dependent upon the economic, environmental, social and political conditions in those countries in which we operate.
We have operating assets, and assets in advanced stages of construction, in 11 countries, including emerging markets, and we expect to have additional development projects in these or other countries. As a result, our results of operations are dependent upon the economic, social and political conditions in each of the countries in which we operate, and we are exposed to a variety of risks, including risks related to:
| heightened economic volatility; |
| difficulty in enforcing agreements, collecting receivables and protecting assets; |
| difficulty in obtaining authorizations, permits and licenses required for the operation of our assets; |
| the possibility of encountering unfavorable circumstances from host country laws or regulations; |
| fluctuations in revenues, operating margins and/or other financial measures due to currency exchange rate fluctuations and restrictions on currency and earnings repatriation; |
| trade protection measures, import or export restrictions, licensing requirements and environmental, local fire and security codes and standards; |
| increased costs and risks of developing, staffing and simultaneously managing a number of foreign operations as a result of language and cultural differences; |
| issues related to occupational safety, work hazard, and adherence to local labor laws and regulations; |
| potentially adverse tax developments or interpretations; |
| changes in political, social and/or economic conditions; |
| the threat of nationalization and expropriation; |
| the presence of corruption in certain countries; |
| fluctuations in the availability of funding; |
23
| a potential deterioration in our relationships with the different stakeholders in the communities surrounding our facilities; and |
| terrorist or other hostile activities. |
Additionally, our revenue is derived primarily from the sale of electricity, and the demand for electricity is largely driven by the economic, political and regulatory conditions of the countries in which we operate. Therefore, our results of operations and financial condition are, to a large extent, dependent upon the overall level of economic activity in these emerging market countries. Should economic or political conditions deteriorate in Peru, or in any of the other countries in which we operate, or in emerging markets generally, such an occurrence could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
We operate in highly competitive markets.
The worldwide markets for power are highly competitive in terms of pricing, quality, development and introduction time, customer service and financing terms. In many of the markets in which we operate, we face downward price pressure and we are or could be exposed to market downturns or slower growth, which may increase in times of declining investment activities, government incentives and/or consumer demand. We face strong competitors, some of which are larger and may have greater resources in a given business area than we have, as well as competitors from emerging markets, which may have better, more efficient cost structures.
For example, we have two assets in advanced stages of construction in PeruCDA and Samay Iwhich we expect to collectively provide 1,110 MW of capacity. We expect generation capacity and, to a lesser extent, the demand for electricity, to increase in Peru. As the increase in demand is expected to be less than the increase in capacity, this oversupply in the Peruvian market is expected to affect the price levels in Peru. As we sell energy and capacity on the spot market in Peru and expect to enter into, and renegotiate, PPAs during this period of downward pressure on energy prices, the oversupply in the Peruvian market may adversely affect our business or results of operations.
Additionally, in recent years, the power production industry has been characterized by strong and increasing competition with respect to obtaining long-term and short-term PPAswhich provide for the sale of electricity, independent of actual generation allocations or provisions of availability, to financially stable distribution companies or other non-regulated consumersand acquiring existing power generation assets. In certain markets, these factors have caused reductions in the prices negotiated in PPAs and, in many cases, have caused higher acquisition prices for existing assets through competitive bidding processes. The evolution of competitive electricity markets and the continued development of highly efficient gas-fired power plants have also caused, or are anticipated to cause, price pressure in certain power markets where we sell or intend to sell power. Certain competitors might be more effective and faster in capturing available market opportunities, which in turn may negatively impact our market share.
Any of these factors alone, or in combination, may negatively impact one or more of our businesses and thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
We primarily operate, and expect to continue to primarily operate, in emerging markets.
We have operations in a number of emerging markets, including Peru, Chile and Colombia. Investing in the securities of a company with operations in emerging markets generally involves a higher degree of risk than investing in the securities of a company with operations in a more developed market. For example, we are subject to increased political, social and economic instability, which may affect the economic results of the emerging markets in which we operate and which stems from many factors, including:
| high interest rates; |
24
| abrupt changes in currency values; |
| high levels of inflation; |
| exchange controls; |
| wage and price controls and increased employment-related regulations; |
| regulations on imports of equipment and other necessities (goods and services) relevant to operations; |
| changes in governmental, economic or tax policies; and |
| social and political tensions, |
any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity or the value of your investment in our securities.
We are a holding company and are dependent upon cash flows from our subsidiaries and associated company to meet our existing and future obligations.
We are a holding company of various operating companies, and as a result, do not conduct independent operations or possess significant assets other than investments in our businesses. Therefore, we depend upon the receipt of sufficient funds from our businesses (via dividends or loans) to meet our obligations, including to contribute committed capital to our businesses, repay any amounts we may borrow in the future, and to pay dividends or other distributions to our shareholders. However, as our businesses are legally distinct from us and will generally be required to service their debt obligations before making distributions to us, our ability to access such cash flow from our businesses may be limited in some circumstances and we may not have the ability to cause our entities to make distributions to us, even if they are able to do so. Additionally, the terms of existing and future joint ventures, financings, or cooperative operational agreements and/or the laws and jurisdictions under which each of our businesses is incorporated may also limit the timing and amount of any dividends, other distributions, loans or loan repayments to us. In the case of Inkia, a business with investments in numerous businesses, its ability to make payments to us may be further limited if its businesses are unable to make payments to it.
Additionally, as dividends are generally taxed and governed by the relevant authority in the jurisdiction in which the company is incorporated or where the company is a tax resident, there may be numerous and significant tax or other legal restrictions on the ability of our businesses to remit funds to us, or to remit such funds without our, or our businesses, incurring significant tax liabilities or incurring a ratings downgrade.
We are significantly leveraged.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had $2,514 million and $2,348 million of outstanding indebtedness on a consolidated basis, respectively. Some of our debt agreements include financial covenants, affirmative and negative covenants, and/or events of default or mandatory prepayments for contractual breaches, change of control events, and/or material mergers and divestments, among other provisions. For example, in connection with the consummation of our sale of our indirect equity interest in Edegel in 2014, we were required to repay the aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding under Inkias then-existing credit facility.
We use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations or investing activities to make debt service payments, reducing our ability to use cash flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures or future business opportunities. In addition, a number of our credit facilities are secured. For example, Kallpas senior secured credit facility, Kallpas capital leases, and the OPC financing agreement are secured by certain of our
25
assets. The pledge of a significant percentage of our assets to secure our debt has reduced the amount of collateral that is available for future secured debt or credit support as well as our flexibility in dealing with these secured assets. This level of indebtedness and related security, as well as the terms governing such indebtedness, could have other important consequences for us, including:
| increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; |
| limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry; |
| limiting our ability to enter into long-term power sales or fuel purchases which require credit support; |
| limiting our ability to adjust to changing market conditions and placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that are not as highly leveraged; |
| limiting our ability to distribute dividends or other payments to our shareholders without leading to a downgrade of our outstanding indebtedness or long-term corporate ratings, if at all; and |
| limiting, along with the financial and other restrictive covenants relating to such indebtedness, among other things, our ability to borrow additional funds for working capital including collateral postings, capital expenditures, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes. |
The indenture governing Inkias $450 million principal amount of bonds limits distributions to us, to 100% of Inkias accrued net income from January 1, 2011, subject to certain exceptions. In May 2014, we repaid $168 million of intercompany debt owed to IC, our former parent, and in June 2014, we repaid $95 million of capital notes owed to IC and made a distribution to IC of $37 million. The repayment of this debt was effectively treated as a dividend for purposes of Inkias indenture, and, as a result, this repayment together with the distribution used up most of Inkias dividend capacity under its indenture, so Inkia will be unable to make distributions to us until it accrues additional net income.
We also provide performance, and other, guarantees, from time to time, in support of the financing and development of certain of our operating companies. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had provided performance, or other, guarantees in an aggregate amount of $105 million.
We may be unable to refinance our existing indebtedness or raise additional indebtedness on favorable terms, or at all.
We may need to refinance all, or a portion of, our indebtedness on or before the respective maturity dates. The ability to refinance any such indebtedness, obtain additional financing or comply with our existing lenders requirements will depend on, among other things:
| our financial condition, or the financial condition of our relevant subsidiaries, at the time of the proposed refinancing; |
| the amount of financing outstanding and lender requirements outstanding at the time of the proposed refinancing; |
| restrictions in any of our credit agreements, indentures, or other outstanding indebtedness; and |
| other factors, including the condition of the financial markets. |
26
If we do not have adequate access to credit, we may be unable to refinance our existing borrowings and credit facilities on commercially reasonable terms and may be forced to raise financing at a higher cost or on less favorable terms ( e.g. , by providing collateral, security or guarantees to lenders and/or accepting higher interest rates) when our existing indebtedness matures. Additionally, if we are not able to refinance any of our indebtedness and do not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and additional borrowings or refinancings or proceeds of asset sales are not available to us, we may not have sufficient cash to enable us to meet all of our obligations. Should future access to capital be unavailable to us, we may have to sell assets or decide not to build new plants or expand or improve existing facilities, any of which could affect our future growth.
If we are unable to manage our interest rate risks effectively, our cash flows and operating results may suffer.
As we continue to develop our projects by (1) drawing down on our credit facilities with third parties, or (2) raising additional third party financing to fund our capital expenditures, we may experience an increase in interest costs. Many of the debt agreements of our operating companies have floating interest rates ( e.g. , many of the debt instruments are tied to London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR) and a continued increase in interest rates could increase the cost of the capital required to continue to fund our development and expansion efforts. In particular, some of this indebtedness is in the form of Consumer Price Index-, or CPI-linked, NIS-denominated bonds. We, or our businesses, may incur further indebtedness in the future that also bears interest at a variable rate or at a rate that is linked to fluctuations in a currency other than the U.S. Dollar.
Although our businesses attempt to manage their interest rate risk by entering into interest rate swaps to manage this risk, there can be no assurance that they will hedge such exposure effectively or at all in the future. Accordingly, increases in interest rates or changes in the CPI that are greater than changes anticipated based upon historical trends could have a material adverse effect on our or any of our businesses business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Our expansion, development and acquisition strategy may be limited.
Our growth strategy contemplates (1) the expansion, construction or development of power generation facilities and (2) the acquisition and development of operating companies in key growth markets. The ability to pursue such growth opportunities successfully will depend upon our ability to identify projects and properties suitable for expansion, construction or acquisitions, and negotiate purchase or engineering, procurement and construction agreements on commercially reasonable terms. Due to growing environmental restrictions, transmission line saturation, obstacles for fuel transportation and a scarcity of places in which new plants may be located, the development of new assets in the countries in which we operatesuch as CDA, Samay I, Kanan and AIEand in the countries in which we may operate in the future, are subject to increased developmental competition and involve higher development costs than in the past, which could have an adverse impact on our strategy and business.
Additionally, we rely significantly on our ability to successfully access the capital markets as a source of liquidity and such reliance may be increased to the extent that we utilize cash from our operations to distribute funds to our shareholders or repay loans. Our ability to arrange financing with no or limited recourse, and the costs of such capital, are dependent upon numerous factors, some of which are beyond our control. Commercial lending institutions sometimes refuse to provide financing in certain less developed economies, and in these situations we may seek direct or indirect (through credit support or guarantees) project financing from a limited number of multilateral or bilateral international financial institutions or agencies. As a precondition to making such project financing available, the lending institutions may also require sponsor guarantees for completion risks and governmental guarantees of certain business and sovereign related risks. However, the financing from international financial agencies or governmental guarantees required to complete projects may not be available when needed. If so, we may have to abandon potential projects or invest more of our own funds, which may not be in line with our investment objectives and would leave less funds for other investments and projects.
27
An inability to identify and source appropriate projects / acquisitions, negotiate the agreements relating to such projects / acquisitions, or secure the necessary funding, could have an adverse impact on our strategy and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Our assets in advanced stages of construction may not be completed or, if completed, may not be completed on time or perform as expected.
We are in the advanced stages of constructing the CDA plant, a run-of-the-river hydroelectric project on the Mantaro River in central Peru, and the Samay I plant, a cold-reserve open-cycle diesel and natural gas (dual-fired) thermoelectric plant in Mollendo, Arequipa, in southern Peru.
The CDA plant, which we initially expected to complete in early 2016, has experienced construction delays and is currently expected to reach its COD in the middle of 2016 as we have granted certain time extensions previously requested by the CDA EPC contractors, which range between four and six months in length, depending on the applicable CDA power generation unit. In connection with such delay, we have agreed to pay, subject to certain conditions, an additional $40 million in the total contract price, subdivided into four payments over the course of the remaining construction period. In addition, we expect that Samay I will reach its COD in the middle of 2016, in accordance with the terms of its agreement with MINEM and that Kanan will reach its COD by the end of 2015 when its contract to supply energy in Panama becomes effective. However, there can be no assurance that CDA, Samay I or Kanan will reach its COD in accordance with our current expectations. Any of the CDA, Samay I or Kanan plants may not be completed within our expected costs or in a timely fashion, or at all, and developmental delays could result in increased costs or breaches of the PPAs relating to these assets. In the case of the CDA plant, an additional minor delay in the completion of the CDA plant could result in an inability to fulfill our obligations under our PPAs or an obligation to purchase energy on the spot market in order to meet our contractual obligations under the relevant PPAs, which may reduce our anticipated revenues or margins. For further information on the timing and the construction of the CDA and Samay I plants, see BusinessPortfolio OverviewPeru SegmentCDA and BusinessPortfolio OverviewPeru SegmentSamay I , respectively.
If our construction efforts with respect to the CDA or Samay I plants are not successful, or are delayed, we may, notwithstanding any liquidated damages to which we are entitled to in accordance with our EPC contracts for these projects, incur penalties or additional costs, or abandon the project and write-off the costs incurred in connection with such project. At the time of abandonment, we would expense all capitalized development costs incurred in connection therewith and may incur additional losses associated with any related contingent liabilities, the occurrence of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Proposed and potential construction or development projects may not be completed or, if completed, may not be completed on time or perform as expected.
We plan to expand our operations through projects constructed on unused land or greenfield projects. Greenfield projects require us to spend significant sums on engineering, permitting, legal, financial advisory and other expenses in preparation for competitive bids that we may not win or before we determine whether a development project is even feasible, economically attractive or capable of being financed. These activities consume a portion of our managements focus and could increase our leverage or reduce our consolidated profitability.
Furthermore, once we decide to proceed with a project and, if applicable, enter into a turnkey agreement to commence the construction of a project, its development and construction still involve numerous additional risks, including:
| unanticipated cost overruns; |
28
| claims from contractors; |
| an inability to obtain financing at affordable rates or at all; |
| delays in obtaining necessary permits and licenses, including environmental permits; |
| unforeseen engineering, environmental and geological problems; |
| adverse changes in the political and regulatory environment in the country in which the project is located; |
| opposition by political, environmental and other local groups; |
| shortages or increases in the price of equipment, materials or labor; |
| work stoppages or other labor disputes; |
| adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, accidents or other unforeseen events; and |
| an inability to perform under PPAs as a result of any delays in the assets becoming operational. |
Any of these risks could result in our financial returns on our projects being lower than expected, or could cause us to operate below expected capacity or availability levels. This, in turn, could result in our experiencing lost revenues and/or increased expenses. Although we maintain insurance to protect against some of these risks, such insurance may not be sufficient. As a result, projects may cost more than anticipated and we may be unable to fund principal and interest payments underlying our construction financing obligations, if any. In addition, a default under such a financing obligation could result in us losing our interest in a power generation facility.
In August 2015, we acquired 100% of the shares of AIE from Hadera Paper for NIS 60 million (approximately $16 million). AIE holds a provisional license for the construction of a 120 MW cogeneration power station in Israel and will seek regulatory approval for licenses in respect of an additional 25 MW. As part of the acquisition, we will need to complete the construction of AIEs facilities which, based upon our initial assessment, we expect will cost approximately $185 million. There is no guarantee that we will be able to commence or complete AIEs construction within a timely fashion, or at the expected cost of approximately $200 million (including the consideration for the acquisition), or at all.
Acquisitions may not perform as expected.
We have recently completed several acquisitions and plan to continue to develop our portfolio through acquisitions in certain attractive markets, including those in which we do not currently operate.
Acquisitions require us to spend significant sums on legal, financial advisory and other expenses and consume a portion of our managements focus. Acquisitions may increase our leverage or reduce our profitability. Future acquisitions may be large and complex, and we may not be able to complete them successfully or at all.
Although acquired businesses may have significant operating histories at the time we acquire them, we will have no history of owning and operating these businesses and potentially limited or no experience operating these particular businesses, or operating businesses in the countries in which these acquired businesses are located. In particular:
| acquired businesses may not perform as expected; |
29
| we may incur unforeseen obligations or liabilities; |
| the fuel supply needed to operate the acquired business at full capacity may not be available; |
| acquired businesses may not generate sufficient cash flow to support the indebtedness incurred to acquire them or the capital expenditures needed to operate them; |
| the rate of return from acquired businesses may be lower than anticipated in our decision to invest our capital to acquire them; and |
| we may not be able to expand as planned or to integrate the acquired companys activities and achieve the economies of scale and any expected efficiency or other gains we had planned, which often drive such acquisition decisions. |
We may not be able to enter into, or renew existing, long-term contracts for the sale of energy and capacity, contracts which reduce volatility in our results of operations.
We sell a substantial majority of our energy under long-term PPAs. Our operating companies rely upon PPAs with a limited number of customers for the majority of their energy sales and revenues over the term of such PPAs, which typically range from one to 15 years. Some of our long-term PPAs are at prices above current spot market prices. Depending on market conditions and regulatory regimes, it may be difficult for us to secure long-term PPAs with new customers, renew existing long-term PPAs as they expire, or enter into long-term PPAs to support the development of new projects. For example, Puerto Quetzals PPAs, representing approximately 172 MW as of December 31, 2014, and Surpetroils PPA with ENERTOLIMA, representing approximately 8 MW as of December 31, 2014, expired in April 2015 and October 2015, respectively, and as of the date of this prospectus, have not been extended or replaced. As a result, CEPP sells the previously contracted capacity on the spot market at the rates dictated by such market. In addition, in December 2011, the Bolivian government amended the applicable law to prohibit generation companies from entering into new PPAs. As a result, we will be unable to extend or replace COBEEs current PPA, under which we have contracted 18.9% of COBEEs installed capacity, when it expires in October 2017.
When the distribution companies in El Salvador organize tenders under the supervision of the SIGET for new long-term PPAs, the bidding rules generally do not permit the participation of HFO-fired generators, such as Nejapa, in tenders for PPAs with terms in excess of five years. An increase in the availability of, and demand for, renewable energy in the other countries in which we operate could lead to similar prohibitions in those countries and a further reduction in our ability to enter into long-term PPAs. Furthermore, the introduction of a more efficient energy generation technology could adversely affect the competitiveness of gas-fired energy plants, such as Kallpa, Las Flores, and, potentially, Samay I, in the dispatch order. Similarly, our remaining assets face potential displacements in dispatch merit orders as new, more efficient technologies became available in their markets. Any displacement of dispatch merit orders could affect the competitiveness of our assets and thereby impact their ability to enter into long-term PPAs. If we are unable to enter into long-term PPAs, we may be required to sell electricity into spot markets at prices that may be below the prices established in our PPAs, particularly in those countries which are, or may be, experiencing an oversupply in capacity in the short- to medium-term. Because of the volatile nature of power prices, if we are unable to secure long-term PPAs, we could face increased volatility in our earnings and cash flows and could experience substantial losses during certain periods which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
30
Supplier concentration may expose us to significant financial credit or performance risk, particularly with respect to those agreements which may expire during the life of our power plants.
We rely on natural gas and HFO to fuel most of our power generation facilities. The delivery of these fuels to our various facilities is dependent upon a number of factors, including the continuing financial viability of contractual counterparties and the infrastructure (including barge facilities, roadways and natural gas pipelines) available to serve each generation facility. Any disruption in the fuel delivery infrastructure or failure of a counterparty to perform, may lead to delays, disruptions or curtailments in the production of power at one or more of our generation facilities. This risk of disruption is compounded by the supplier concentration that characterizes many of our operating companies.
We source most of our HFO from a limited number of suppliers. In the event of shipping delays which may affect our suppliers, we may experience delays in the receipt and transportation of our HFO. Additionally, many of our gas suppliers are sole or monopolistic suppliers, and may exercise monopolistic control over their supply of natural gas to us. The Kallpa and Las Flores plants generation facilities, for example, rely on a consortium, composed of Pluspetrol Peru Corporation S.A., Pluspetrol Camisea S.A., Hunt Oil Company of Peru L.L.C. Sucursal del Perú, SK Corporation Sucursal Peruana, Sonatrach Peru Corporation S.A.C., Tecpetrol del Perú S.A.C. and Repsol Exploración Perú Sucursal del Perú, which we collectively refer to as the Camisea Consortium, for the provision of natural gas and on a sole supplier for the transportation of such natural gas. If these suppliers cannot perform under their contracts, the Kallpa and Las Flores plants would be unable to generate electricity at their facilities, and such a failure could prevent Kallpa and Las Flores from fulfilling their contractual obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. Continued supply of natural gas to the Kallpa and Las Flores plants is dependent upon a number of factors, over which we have no control, including:
| levels of exploration, drilling, reserves and production of natural gas in the Camisea fields and other areas in Peru and the price of such natural gas; |
| accessibility of the Camisea fields and other gas production areas in Peru, which may be affected by weather, natural disasters, geographic and geological conditions, environmental restrictions and regulations, activities of terrorist group or other impediments to access; |
| the availability, price and quality of natural gas from alternative sources; |
| market conditions for the renewal of such agreements before their expiration and our ability to renew such agreements and the terms of any renewal; and |
| the regulatory environment in Peru. |
Upon the commencement of Samay Is second operational stage, Samay Is plant will operate as a natural gas-fired power plant, and will thereby be dependent upon the Camisea Consortium for the provision of natural gas to it and will also depend upon gas transportation services rendered by Concesionaria Gasoducto Sur Peruano S.A.s through its natural gas pipeline, which is currently under construction.
Furthermore, as these suppliers are the principal suppliers of natural gas and natural gas transportation services to substantially all generation facilities in Peru fueled by natural gas, a change in the terms of their agreements with us or other power generators, or a failure by either of these suppliers to meet their contractual obligations, could have a significant effect on Perus entire electricity supply and, therefore, prompt the Peruvian governmental authorities to undertake certain remedial actions. Any such actions could adversely affect the operations of the Kallpa or Las Flores plants, or the expected operations of the Samay I plant.
31
Similarly, OPC has a gas supply agreement with a single supplier, which provides for the curtailment of OPCs gas supply in the event of a lack of pipeline capacity. Although OPC has never experienced a significant decline in its gas supply as a result of congestion in Israel and a lack of pipeline capacity, there can be no assurance that such declines will not occur. OPC also relies on a single transporter for the transport of its natural gas requirements. If such parties are unable to perform under their contracts with OPC, or are forced to curtail, in whole or in part, their supply or transport of natural gas to OPC, OPC would not be able to generate electricity using natural gas, which could adversely affect OPCs operations and financial performance.
Moreover, certain of our contracts for natural gas are scheduled to expire during the life of the power plants which they service. These contracts have not yet been extended or replaced with one or more contracts on comparable terms. For example, Kallpa, our largest asset, purchases its natural gas requirements for its generation facilities from the Camisea Consortium pursuant to a natural gas supply agreement which expires in June 2022 and which has not yet been extended. If we are unable to renew, or enter into supply contracts and, in particular, enter into long-term supply contracts, we may be required to purchase our natural gas on spot markets at prices that may be significantly greater than the prices we previously paid for such commodities, or may be unable to purchase such commodities on competitive prices at all. As a result, we could face increased volatility in our earnings and cash flows and could experience substantial losses during certain periods which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Certain of our facilities are affected by climate conditions and changes in the climates or other occurrences of natural phenomena in the countries in which these facilities operate could have a material adverse effect on us.
Certain of our generation facilities are based on hydroelectric power generation. As a result, their operating results are directly impacted by water sources which are, in turn, affected by the amount of rainfall and snowmelt.
The occurrence of natural phenomena, such as El Niño and La Niña, two climactic phenomena that influence rainfall regularity in some of the Latin American countries in which we operate, may result in droughts which affect our results of operations. A prolonged drought in a country in which our generation facilities rely on hydroelectric energy may reduce our ability to operate our hydroelectric plants at full capacity. In addition, a prolonged drought may result in disputes with governments, regulators, local communities, farmers and other stakeholders over water use. As a result of such disputes, we may be forced to enter into agreements which restrict our ability to use water for hydroelectric generation.
Droughts and excessive rainfall also affect the operation of our thermal plants, including those facilities which use natural gas or HFO as fuel, in the following manner:
| During periods of drought, thermal plants are used more frequently. Operating costs of thermal plants can be considerably higher than those of hydroelectric plants. Our operating expenses may increase during these periods. |
| Our thermal plants require water for cooling and a drought not only reduces the availability of water, but also increases the concentration of chemicals, such as sulfates in the water. The high concentration of chemicals in the water we use for cooling increases the risk of damaging the equipment at our thermal plants as well as the risk of violating relevant environmental regulations. As a result, we may have to purchase water from areas that are also experiencing shortages of water. These water purchases may increase our operating costs, as well as the costs relating to our social responsibility commitments. |
| Thermal power plants burning gas generate emissions such as sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) gases. When operating with diesel, they also release particulate matter into the atmosphere. Therefore, greater use of thermal plants during periods of drought increases the risk of unsatisfactory performance of the abatement equipment used to control pollutant emissions. |
32
| During excessive rainfall periods, hydroelectric plants increase their generation, which reduces the spot prices in the system, and also reduces the dispatch of thermal power plants. As a result, our thermal plants selling energy to the spot market may face a reduction in their margins due to their lower dispatch or due to sales occurring at the lower spot prices. |
Additionally, certain of our facilities are also exposed to additional climate change risk and to the specific natural phenomena occurring in their respective countries of operation, including earthquakes (due to heightened seismic activity), hurricanes and flooding, landslides, volcanic eruptions, fire, and other natural disasters. For example, in 2007, Peru experienced a 7.9 magnitude earthquake that struck the central coast of Peru. In 2015, Peru has also experienced flooding. The occurrence of any of the natural calamities listed above may cause significant damage to our power stations and facilities.
Furthermore, the production of wind energy depends heavily on suitable wind conditions, which are variable and difficult to predict. Operating results for such plants vary significantly from period to period depending on the wind resource during the periods in question. Therefore, the electricity generated by our wind energy plants may not meet our anticipated production levels or the rated capacity of the turbines located there, which could adversely affect our business.
We could experience severe business disruptions, significant decreases in revenues based on lower demand arising from climate changes or catastrophic events, or significant additional costs to us not otherwise covered by business interruption insurance policies. There may be an important time lag between a major climate change event, accident or catastrophic event and our recovery from any insurance policies, which typically carry non-recoverable deductible amounts, and in any event, are subject to caps per event. Furthermore, many of our supply agreements, including our natural gas supply agreements and transportation services agreements, contain force majeure provisions that allow for the suspension of performance by our counterparties for the duration of certain force majeure events. If a force majeure event were to occur and our counterparties were to temporarily suspend performance under their contracts, we may be forced to find alternative suppliers in the market on short notice (which we may be unable to do) and incur additional costs. Additionally, any of these events could cause adverse effects on the energy demand of some of our customers and of consumers generally in the affected market, the occurrence of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
We are exposed to electricity spot market, fuel and other commodity price volatility.
We purchase and sell electricity in the wholesale spot markets. During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we purchased 25%, 18%, 18% and 7% of the electricity that we sold (in GWh) from the spot market, respectively. As a result, we are exposed to spot market prices, which tend to fluctuate substantially. Unlike most other commodities, electric power can only be stored on a very limited basis and generally must be produced concurrently with our use. As a result, power prices are subject to significant volatility from supply and demand imbalances, especially within the spot markets in which we may purchase and sell electricity. Typically, spot market prices for electricity are volatile and the demand for such electricity often reflects the cyclical fluctuating cost of coal, natural gas and oil, rain volumes or the conditions of hydro reservoirs. The Peruvian and Chilean electricity markets are also indirectly affected by the price of copper, as a result of the electricity-intensive mining industry, which represents a significant source of the electricity demand in these markets. Therefore, a decline in such mining activity could adversely affect us, and any changes in the supply and cost of coal, natural gas and oil, rain volumes, the conditions of hydro reservoirs, the unexpected unavailability of other generating units, or the supply and cost of copper, may impact the volume of electricity demanded by the market. Volatility in market prices for fuel and electricity may result from many factors which are beyond our control and we do not generally engage in hedging transactions to minimize such risks. For general information on our hedging arrangements, see Note 29 to our audited financial statements included in this prospectus.
33
We are exposed to counterparty risks.
Our cash flows and results of operations are dependent upon the continued ability of our customers to meet their obligations under their relevant PPAs. Additionally, a small number of customers purchase a significant portion of our output under PPAs that account for a substantial percentage of the anticipated revenue of our operating companies. Although our operating companies evaluate the creditworthiness of their various counterparties, our operating companies may not always be able to, if at all, fully anticipate, detect, or protect against deterioration in a counterpartys creditworthiness and overall financial condition. The deterioration of creditworthiness or overall financial condition of a material counterparty (or counterparties) could expose us to an increased risk of non-payment or other default under our contracts with them. For example, CEPP, our Dominican Republic generation subsidiary, has experienced significant payment delays under its PPAs.
Furthermore, if any of the counterparties to our PPAs were to become insolvent, we may be unable to recover payment under local insolvency laws. For example, under Peruvian insolvency laws, if a private counterparty under any of our PPAs were to become insolvent, our claims with respect to payments due by such counterparty under its relevant contract will rank junior to, among others, the counterpartys labor, social security, pension fund and secured obligations. In such a case, our ability to recover payments due on our existing PPAs in Peru may be limited. Any default by any of our key customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
We rely on power transmission facilities that we do not own or control and that are subject to transmission constraints. If these facilities fail to provide us with adequate transmission capacity, we may be restricted in our ability to deliver wholesale electric power and we may either incur additional costs or forego revenues.
We depend upon transmission facilities owned and operated by others to deliver the wholesale power we sell from our power generation plants. If transmission is disrupted, or if the transmission capacity infrastructure is inadequate, our ability to sell and deliver wholesale power may be adversely impacted. If the power transmission infrastructure in one or more of the markets that we serve is inadequate, our recovery of wholesale costs and profits may be limited. If restrictive transmission price regulation is imposed, the transmission companies may not have sufficient incentive to invest in expansion of transmission infrastructure. We cannot predict whether transmission facilities will be expanded in specific markets to accommodate competitive access to those markets, a failure of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. In addition, in some of the markets in which we operate, different spot prices may occur within the grid as a result of a transmission constraint. As a result, we may need to purchase energy in the spot market in order to fulfill a PPA obligation in one part of the grid, even if we are generating energy in another part of the grid, and such purchase may occur at a spot market price which is higher than our own generation cost.
If any of our generation units are unable to generate energy as a result of a breakdown or other failure, we may be required to purchase energy on the spot market to meet our contractual obligations under the relevant PPAs.
The breakdown or failure of one of our generation facilities may require us to purchase energy in the spot market to meet our contractual obligations under our PPAs, while simultaneously resulting in an increase in the spot market price of energy, resulting in a contraction, or loss, of our margins. In addition, the failure or breakdown of one of our generation units may prevent that particular facility from performing under applicable PPAs which, in certain situations, could result in termination of the PPA or liability for liquidated damages, the occurrence of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. For example, due to unscheduled maintenance of one of its turbines in the first half of 2013, Kallpa was required to make energy purchases on the spot market to meets its obligations under its PPAs. For further information on the effect of the Kallpa plants unscheduled maintenance stoppage on its cost of sales
34
in 2013, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperating ResultsYear Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012Cost of Sales (Excluding Depreciation and Amortization).
We maintain insurance policies for property value and business interruptions, intended to mitigate any losses due to customary risks. However, we cannot assure you that the scope of damages suffered in such an event would not exceed the policy limits, deductibles, losses, or loss of profits outlined in our insurance coverage. We may be materially and adversely affected if we incur losses that are not fully covered by our insurance policies and such losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. For further information on the risks related to our insurance policies, see Our insurance policies may not fully cover damage, and we may not be able to obtain insurance against certain risks .
Some of the countries in which we operate, or may operate in the future, have experienced terrorist activity and social unrest in the past and it is possible that a resurgence of terrorism in any of these countries could occur in the future.
Some of the countries in which we operate, or may operate in the future, have experienced terrorist activity and social unrest in the past. For example, Peru, the country in which we have our largest operations, experienced terrorist activity that reached its peak of violence against the government and private sector in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Our operating company in Peru represented 45% of our Adjusted EBITDA for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Any terrorist activities or other hostile actions in Peru could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operation. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure. For a reconciliation of Kallpas net income to Kallpas Adjusted EBITDA (which reflects the portion of our Adjusted EBITDA which is represented by Peru), see BusinessPortfolio Overview .
The existing security, economic and geopolitical conditions in Israel and the Middle East could affect our operations in Israel. Israel has been and is subject to terrorist activity, with varying levels of severity. Parties with whom we do business have sometimes declined to travel to Israel during periods of heightened unrest or tension, forcing us to make alternative arrangements where necessary. Developments in the political and security situation in Israel may also result in parties with whom we have agreements claiming that they are not obligated to perform their commitments under those agreements pursuant to force majeure provisions. Any deterioration in the security or geopolitical conditions in Israel and/or the Middle East could adversely impact our business relationships and thereby have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Israels geopolitical situation has led to security issues and, as a result, our Israel-based subsidiary OPC, as well as any additional entities we may develop or acquire in Israel, including AIE, may be exposed to hostile activities (including harm to computer systems or, with respect to our operations, missile attacks on our facilities or attacks on critical infrastructure, such as gas transmission systems or pipelines), security restrictions connected with Israeli bodies/organizations overseas, possible isolations by various bodies for numerous political reasons, and other limitations. Any of the aforementioned events and conditions could disrupt our and OPCs operations, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Additionally, should OPC lose its classification as an essential facility by the State of Israel, which classification exempts OPCs key employees from military service in times of emergency, OPCs employees may be subject to being called upon to perform military service in Israel. Such absence may have an adverse effect upon OPCs operations, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
35
Inflation in any of the countries in which we currently, or will, operate could adversely affect us.
If any of the countries in which we currently operate, or in which we may operate in the future, experiences substantial inflation, the costs of our operations could increase and our operating margins could decrease, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. A number of the countries in which we operate have experienced significant inflation in prior years, including Peru, our primary country of operation. Inflationary pressures may also impact our margins to the extent that cost increases driven by inflation are not accompanied by corresponding increases in the price of electricity or capacity sold, or limit our ability to trigger the minimum thresholds set forth in the price adjustment mechanisms in our PPAs or long-term supply agreements or access foreign financial markets, and may also prompt government intervention in the economy of the affected country, including the introduction of government policies that may adversely affect the overall performance of such economy. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
We have granted rights to the minority shareholders of certain of our subsidiaries.
Although we own a majority of the voting equity in most of our businesses, we have entered into, and may, and in some instances, will be required to, continue to enter into, shareholders agreements granting minority rights to the minority shareholders of certain of those entities. For example, we have entered into shareholders agreements with, among others, Energía del Pacífico S.A., or Energía del Pacífico, a member of the Quimpac group and the minority shareholder of Kallpa, CDA and Samay I, as well as with Veolia Energy Israel Ltd., or Veolia, the minority shareholder of OPC, and Centrans Energy Services Inc. the minority shareholder of our Nicaraguan assets. Among other things, our shareholders agreements generally grant the applicable minority shareholder veto rights over significant acquisitions and dispositions as well as the incurrence of significant debt. Therefore, our ability to develop and operate any of our businesses governed by a shareholders agreement may be limited if we are unable to obtain the approval of a minority shareholder for certain corporate actions we deem to be in the best interest of the relevant business. In addition, such shareholders agreements may limit our ability to dispose of our interests in any of these businesses. Our operation of our subsidiaries may also subject us to litigation proceedings initiated by the minority shareholders of our subsidiaries. For example, we were involved in litigation proceedings initiated by Crystal Power Corporation, Limited, or Crystal Power, who previously held a non-controlling interest in Nejapa. In January 2015, we acquired Crystal Powers 29% stake in Nejapa in connection with the settlement of our shareholder dispute with Crystal Power, increasing our ownership interest to 100%. For further information on our shareholders agreements, see BusinessShareholders Agreements .
We do not control Pedregal.
We own a minority interest in Pedregal. Pedregal has entered into a management services agreement with our wholly-owned subsidiary Inkia Panama Management S.R.L., or Inkia Panama Management, that expires in October 2016. Under this agreement, Inkia Panama Management has been designated as the administrator responsible for day-to-day management of Pedregal. Therefore, although we have the right to manage Pedregal, we are still subject to the risk that Pedregal may make business, operational or financial decisions that we do not agree with, as well as the risk that we may have objectives that differ from those of Pedregal or its controlling shareholder. Our ability to control the development and operation of Pedregal may be limited, and we may not be able to realize some or all of the benefits that we expect to realize from our investment in Pedregal.
In addition, we rely on the internal controls and financial reporting controls of our businesses, including Pedregal, and the failure of our businesses to maintain effective controls or to comply with applicable standards could make it difficult to comply with applicable reporting and audit standards. For example, the preparation of our consolidated financial statements will require the prompt receipt of financial statements from Pedregal. Additionally, in certain circumstances, we may be required to file with our annual reports on Form 20-F, or registration statements filed with the SEC, financial information of Pedregal that has been audited in conformity with SEC rules and regulations and U.S. GAAS audit standards. As we do not control Pedregal, we may not,
36
however, be able to procure such financial statements, or such audited financial statements, as applicable, from Pedregal and this could render us unable to comply with applicable SEC reporting standards.
We could face risks, or barriers to exit, in connection with the disposals or transfers of our businesses or their assets.
We continually assess the strategic composition of our power generation portfolio and may, as a result of our assessments, divest our interests in businesses whose operations are inconsistent with our long-term strategic plan. Divestitures can generate organizational and operational efficiencies, cash for use in our capital investment program and operations, and cash to repay outstanding debt. However, divestitures may also result in a decline in our net income or profitability.
Additionally, we may face exit barriers, including high exit costs or objections from various stakeholders, in connection with dispositions of certain of our operating companies or their assets. For example, pursuant to Israels Electricity Sector Law 5756-1996, or Electricity Sector Law, the transfer of control over an entity that holds a generation license in Israel must be approved by Israels Minister of National Infrastructures, Energy and Water Resources. Additionally, pursuant to OPCs PPA with the IEC and OPCs syndicated credit agreement, both the IEC and OPCs lenders must consent to our transfer of control of OPC to a third-party. Such restrictions, as well as similar restrictions contained within other shareholders agreements or financing agreements in respect of our other operating companies may prohibit us from disposing of our interests in our businesses, and such prohibitions may have a material adverse effect on our development and growth strategy. Furthermore, although we have recently exported power generation barges (from Guatemala and the Dominican Republic to Panama), we may face opposition from local governments in connection with any decision to sell and/or export any of the power generation barges we have installed or may install from one country to another country.
We require qualified personnel to manage and operate our various businesses and projects.
As a result of our decentralized structure, we require qualified and competent management to independently direct the day-to-day business activities of each of our businesses, execute their respective business and/or project development plans, and service their respective customers, suppliers and other stakeholders, in each case across numerous geographic locations. The services offered by our businesses are highly technical in nature and require specialized training and/or physically demanding work. Therefore, we must be able to retain employees and professionals with the skills necessary to understand the continuously developing needs of our customers, to maximize the value of each of our businesses, and to ensure the timely and successful completion of any expansion or development projects. This includes developing talent and leadership capabilities in the emerging markets in which certain of our businesses operate, where the depth of skilled employees may be limited. Changes in demographics, training requirements and/or the unavailability of qualified personnel could negatively impact the ability of each of our businesses to meet these demands. Although we have adequate personnel for the current business environment, unpredictable increases in the demand for our services, or the geographical diversity of our businesses, may exacerbate the risk of not having a sufficient number of trained personnel.
In addition, our operating companies could experience strikes, industrial unrest or work stoppages. In June 2015, COBEEs facilities in Bolivia experienced a brief strike. Although the strikes at our COBEE facilities did not result in a work stoppage or have a material effect on our results of operations, there can be no assurance that future strikes or industrial unrest will not occur or lead to a work stoppage which could have an effect adverse effect on our results of operations. A significant percentage of our employees in Bolivia, Israel and Jamaica are members of unions, and approximately 17% of all of our employees are unionized. For further information on our unionized employees, see BusinessEmployees .
37
If any of our businesses fail to train and retain qualified personnel, or if they experience excessive turnover, strikes or work stoppages, we may experience declining production, maintenance delays or other inefficiencies, increased recruiting, training or relocation costs and other difficulties, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Our success will also be dependent upon the decision-making of our directors and executive officers as well as the directors and executive officers of our businesses. The loss of any or all of our directors and executive officers could affect the creation or implementation of our short-term plans or long-term strategies or divert our directors and executive officers attention from our operations, which could result in a delay in the completion of a project, affect our ability to enter into PPAs, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
The interruption or failure of our information technology, communication and processing systems or external attacks and invasions of these systems could have an adverse effect on us.
We depend on information technology, communication and processing systems to operate our businesses. Such systems are vital to each of our operating companies ability to monitor our power plants operations, maintain generation and network performance, adequately generate invoices to customers, achieve operating efficiencies and meet our service targets and standards. Damage to our networks and backup mechanisms may result in service delays or interruptions and limit our ability to provide customers with reliable service over our networks. Some of the risks to our networks and infrastructure include:
| physical damage to access lines, including theft, vandalism, terrorism or other similar events; |
| energy surges or outages; |
| software defects; |
| scarcity of network capacity and equipment; |
| disruptions beyond our control; |
| breaches of security, including cyber-attacks and other external attacks; and |
| natural disasters. |
The occurrence of any such event could cause interruptions in service or reduce our generation capacity, either of which could reduce our revenues or cause us to incur additional expenses. Although we have operational insurance with business interruption coverage that may protect us against specific insured events, we may not be insured for all events or for the full amount of the lost margin or additional expense. In addition, the occurrence of any such event may subject us to penalties and other sanctions imposed by the applicable regulatory authorities. The occurrence of damages to our networks and systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
We are exposed to material litigation and/or administrative proceedings.
We are involved in various litigation proceedings, and may be subject to future litigation proceedings, any of which could result in unfavorable decisions or financial penalties against us, and we will continue to be subject to future litigation proceedings, which could have material adverse consequences to our business.
For example, since 2010, the Peruvian Tax Authority ( Superintendencia Nacional de Administración Tributaria ), known as SUNAT for its abbreviation in Spanish, has issued tax assessments to Kallpa and its lenders (as lessors under the Kallpa leases) for payment of import taxes allegedly owed by Kallpa and its lenders in
38
connection with the engineering services of the EPC contractors for Kallpa I, II, III and IV. The assessments were made on the basis that Kallpa and its lenders did not include the value of the engineering services rendered by the contractor of the relevant project in the tax base for the import taxes. Kallpa disagrees with these tax assessments on the grounds that the engineering services rendered to design and build the power plant are not part of the imported goods but a separate service for which Kallpa paid its corresponding taxes. Kallpa and its lenders disputed the tax assessments before SUNAT and, after SUNAT confirmed the assessments, appealed before the Peruvian Tax Administrative Court, or the Tribunal Fiscal, except for the assessment of Kallpa IV, for which SUNAT has not yet rendered a decision. In January 2015, Kallpa and its lenders were notified that the Tribunal Fiscal had rejected their appeal in respect of the Kallpa I assessment. Kallpa and its lenders disagreed with the Tribunal Fiscals decision and challenged this decision in the Peruvian courts. In order to challenge the Kallpa I ruling, Kallpa and its lenders were required to pay the tax assessment of Kallpa I in the aggregate amount of approximately $12.3 million, which amount consists of the tax assessment for Kallpa I, plus related interest and fines. In April 2015, Kallpa and its lenders made the final payment (under protest) regarding Kallpa Is tax assessment in order to appeal the administrative ruling of the Tribunal Fiscal in the judicial system. Kallpa has reimbursed the lenders for each of the amounts due under the terms and conditions set forth in the operation agreement dated July 31, 2008, as amended, by and among Citibank del Perú S.A., Citileasing S.A., Banco de Crédito del Perú, Scotiabank Perú, and Kallpa. To the extent that the appeal is successful, Kallpa and its lenders will be entitled to seek the return of the amounts paid to SUNAT. A decision of the Tribunal Fiscal of the Kallpa appeals in respect of the Kallpa II and III assessments is still pending. As of February 2015, the total amount of import taxes claimed by SUNAT against Kallpa and its lenders in connection with the importation of equipment related to the Kallpa II, III and IV projects, equals approximately $22.2 million, including penalties, interest and fines in the amount of $17.9 million. For further information on these proceedings, see BusinessLegal ProceedingsKallpaImport Tax Assessments .
Litigation and/or regulatory proceedings are inherently unpredictable, and excessive verdicts do occur. Adverse outcomes in lawsuits and investigations could result in significant monetary damages, including indemnification payments, or injunctive relief that could adversely affect our ability to conduct our business and may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. For example, the Tribunal Fiscals decision, with respect to the Kallpa I plant, could have a negative impact on the outstanding rulings and assessments in respect of the Kallpa II, III and IV plants or other plants or projects. In addition, such investigations, claims and lawsuits could involve significant expense and diversion of our managements attention and resources from other matters, each of which could also have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Our insurance policies may not fully cover damage, and we may not be able to obtain insurance against certain risks.
We maintain insurance policies intended to mitigate our losses due to customary risks. These policies cover our assets against loss for physical damage, loss of revenue and also third-party liability. However, we cannot assure you that the scope of damages suffered in the event of a natural disaster or catastrophic event would not exceed the policy limits of our insurance coverage. In addition, we may be required to pay insurance deductibles, which are not recoverable, in order to utilize our insurance policies. We maintain all-risk physical damage coverage for losses resulting from, but not limited to, fire, explosions, floods, windstorms, strikes, riots, mechanical breakdowns and business interruption. Our level of insurance may not be sufficient to fully cover all losses that may arise in the course of our business or insurance covering our various risks may not continue to be available in the future. In addition, we may not be able to obtain insurance on comparable terms in the future. We may be materially and adversely affected if we incur losses that are not fully covered by our insurance policies and such losses could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. For further information on our insurance policies, see BusinessInsurance.
39
Future expansion into new markets or businesses involve significant costs and risks, and may be unsuccessful.
We are constantly monitoring and assessing development and acquisition opportunities. In particular, we may seek to diversify and expand our operations to certain countries in which we do not currently have a presence, such as Mexico, through greenfield development projects and acquisitions. We may also seek to expand and diversify our portfolio by entering into the electricity distribution and/or transmission businesses through acquisitions.
We have no experience in operating power transmission and distribution businesses, or in operating in the electricity sectors in certain of the countries in which we are considering expansion, such as Mexico. In entering into new markets and operating in these new businesses, we would face managerial, commercial, technological and regulatory risks. The business strategies, managerial expertise and institutional knowledge that we utilize and have developed over time with regard to power generation in the countries in which we currently operate may not be applicable to the power transmission and distribution businesses, or to the energy sectors of the countries in which we are considering expansion.
As expansion into a new market or business will require significant investment of capital and management resources, such expansions will involve many risks, including risks related to:
| obtaining the necessary government and regulatory licenses and authorizations to operate; |
| the significant capital expenditures required to establish a footprint in these businesses and markets; |
| competition from experienced market participants; |
| an inability to attract customers, create brand awareness and establish brand credibility; |
| an inability to establish relationships with regulators, stakeholders and other market participants; and |
| barriers to entry. |
If we do acquire companies or assets in the power distribution and transmission businesses, or in new markets such as Mexico, we cannot provide assurance that such expansion of our business will be successful. The process of integrating acquired operations, personnel and information systems and commencing commercial operations could involve significant costs and absorb management time and resources and otherwise distract management from other opportunities or problems in our primary business of power generation and our primary markets, such as Peru and Israel. If we are unsuccessful in any attempt to expand into new markets or businesses, this may have a material adverse effect on our material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Risks Related to Government Regulation
The production and profitability of IPPs in Israel may be adversely affected by changes in Israels regulatory environment.
Israels Public Utilities Authority (Electricity), or the PUAE, regulates and supervises, among other things, the provision of essential electric public services in Israel and OPCs operations can be affected by changes in the PUAEs policies, regulations, and tariffs. The PUAEs generation component tariff, for example, serves as the base price for OPCs calculation of the sale price of its energy to its private customers. As a result, its increases or decreases have a related effect on the sales price of OPCs energy and OPCs revenues. In addition, the price at which OPC purchases its natural gas from its sole natural gas supplier, the Tamar Group, a group composed of Noble Energy Mediterranean Ltd., or Noble, Delek Drilling Limited Partnership, Isramco Negev 2 Limited Partnership, Avner Oil Exploration Limited Partnership and Dor Gas Exploration Limited Partnership, is
40
predominantly indexed (in excess of 70%) to changes in the PUAEs generation component tariff, pursuant to the price formula set forth in OPCs supply agreement with the Tamar Group. As a result, increases or decreases in this tariff have a related effect on OPCs cost of sales and margins.
In July 2013, the PUAE published four generation component tariffs/power cost indicators, ranging from NIS 386 per MWh to NIS 333.2 per MWh, instead of the single tariff that had previously been used. In January 2015, the PUAE replaced the four tariffs with two tariffs, reducing the rates by approximately 10% to NIS 300.9 per MWh and NIS 301.5 per MWh. In connection with the indexation of their natural gas price formula for OPCs gas supply agreement with the Tamar Group, OPC and the Tamar Group disagreed as to which of the PUAEs July 2013 tariffs applied to OPCs supply agreement and have a similar disagreement with respect to the tariffs published in January 2015. OPC and the Tamar Group remain in discussions with respect to this disagreement.
Additionally, on September 8, 2015, the PUAE published a final decision, which became effective on September 13, 2015, reducing the PUAE generation component tariff by approximately 12% to NIS 265.2 per MWh. This reduction will result in a corresponding decline in the sale prices of OPCs energy and OPCs revenues. In addition, the natural gas price formula in OPCs supply agreement is subject to a floor mechanism. As a result of previous declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, OPC will begin to pay the ultimate floor price in November 2015. Therefore, the recent September 2015 decline and any further declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, will not result in a corresponding decline in OPCs natural gas expenses, and will lead to a greater decline in OPCs margins, which may have a material adverse effect on OPCs business, results of operations and financial condition.
Furthermore, since 2013, the PUAE had been in the process of determining a system cost tariff. In August 2015, the PUAE published a decision that IPPs in Israel would be obligated to pay system management service charges, which charges are retroactively effective as of June 1, 2013. According to the PUAE decision, as amended in September 2015, the amount of system management service charges that would be payable by OPC from the effective date of June 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015, is approximately NIS 159 million (approximately $41 million), not including interest rate and linkage costs. The approximately NIS 159 million which the PUAE has deemed payable by OPC is based upon the average rate of the system management service charges. However, as the rate of the new system management service charges, like other rates of the PUAE, varies by season (e.g., summer and winter) and by demand period (peak, shoulder and off-peak), the PUAEs final calculation of the amount payable by OPC will be based upon the applicable time of use rates. For further information on Israels seasonality and the related PUAE tariffs, see IndustryIndustry OverviewIsrael . ICP is considering the implications of this decision and may contest it.
If OPC incurs significant costs or experiences a reduction in revenues or margins as a result of changes in regulation or the establishment of any new regimes or the implementation of any such laws or governmental regulations, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Additionally, a steering committee was appointed by the State of Israel in July 2013 to propose comprehensive reform of IEC. Although such committee has not published its final recommendations, and there have been no formal announcements concerning the steering committees discussions or negotiations with IEC and the State of Israel, the steering committee may formally renew its discussions and publish its final recommendations in the future or otherwise commence with comprehensive reform of IEC and the Israeli electricity market. Additionally, draft legislation was recently introduced in Israel which, if adopted, would result in the replacement of the PUAE with a new electricity authority. The effect of any such reforms on OPC is uncertain. For further information on the regulation of the Israeli electricity sector, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Israeli Electricity SectorPUAE .
Governments have a high degree of influence in the countries in which we operate.
We operate power generation businesses, or have investments in assets in advanced stages of construction, in 11 countries and therefore are subject to significant and diverse government regulation. The laws
41
and regulations affecting our operations are complex, dynamic and subject to new interpretations or changes. Such regulations affect almost every aspect of our businesses, have broad application and, to a certain extent, limit managements ability to independently make and implement decisions regarding numerous operational matters. Additionally, governments in many of the markets in which we operate frequently intervene in the economy and occasionally make significant changes in monetary, credit, industry and other policies and regulations. Government actions to control inflation and other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports. We have no control over, and cannot predict, what measures or policies governments may enact in the future. The results of operations and financial condition of our businesses may be adversely affected by changes in governmental policy or regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate if those changes impact, among other things:
| consumption of electricity and natural gas; |
| supply of electricity and natural gas; |
| operation and maintenance of generation, transmission or distribution facilities, including the receipt of provisional and/or permanent operational licenses; |
| tariffs or royalties on the use of water for hydroelectric or thermal plants; |
| energy policy; |
| rules governing the dispatch merit order; |
| key permits or operating licenses that we currently hold; |
| calculations of marginal costs or spot prices; |
| subsidies and incentives; |
| tariffs, including under PPAs where tariffs are limited to regulated rates; |
| labor, environmental, or other laws; |
| mandatory salary increases; |
| public consultations for new projects; |
| social responsibility obligations; |
| economic growth; |
| currency fluctuations and inflation; |
| fiscal policy and interest rates; |
| capital control policies and liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets; |
| tax laws, including the effect of tax laws on distributions from our subsidiaries; |
| import/export restrictions; |
| acquisitions, construction, or dispositions of power assets; and |
42
| other political, social and economic developments in or affecting the countries in which our operating companies are based. |
Uncertainty over whether governments will implement changes in policy or regulations affecting these or other factors in the future may also contribute to economic uncertainty and heightened volatility in the securities markets.
Existing or future legislation and regulation or future audits could require material expenditures by us or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our operations. For example, Peruvian regulators have increased their reviews of permitting, licensing and concession applications and have recently imposed time limits on newly-granted licenses and concessions. Additionally, unregulated clients will be provided access to the short-term market on January 1, 2016. However, as the regulatory rules that would govern their access have not yet been approved, there remains uncertainty as to how such access will be implemented and the impact such access may have on power companies in Peru, including our Peruvian assets. The provision of such access could result in increased competition in the Peruvian generation sector and/or result in increased pressures to reduce contractual prices in Peru. Furthermore, general elections in Peru are expected to take in place in April 2016, and presidential and congressional elections may impact the development of certain industries, affect the interpretation of existing legislation or result in the enactment of additional regulations, actions or agencies, which may result in changes in regulations in Peru that adversely effect our business. Peruvian regulators may also enact processes to expand generation capacity in Peru in excess of the rate of demand growth, which expansion could therefore have a negative impact on spot and contractual prices in Peru, which in turn could reduce the margins of our Peruvian assets. Moreover, Peruvian regulators may amend the rules that govern how natural gas prices in Peru are determined and such prices are used to determine the variable fuel cost of thermal generation units that burn such fuel. As a result, any such amendment may affect the order of dispatch of thermal generation units in the Peruvian system (such as Kallpa or Samay I), which may have a material adverse effect on our margins or results of operations.
Additionally, government agencies could take enforcement actions against us and impose sanctions or penalties on us for failure to comply with applicable regulations. Depending on the severity of the infraction, enforcement actions could include the closure or suspension of operations, the imposition of fines or other remedial measures, and the revocation of licenses. Compliance with enhanced regulations could force us to make capital expenditures and divert funds away from planned investments in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Due to populist political trends that have become more prevalent in certain of the countries in which we operate over recent years, some of the governments or authorities in countries where we operate might seek to promote efforts to increase government involvement in regulating economic activity, including the energy sector, which could result in the introduction of additional political factors in economic decisions. For example, Bolivia has nationalized natural gas and petroleum assets, as well as generation companies that compete with us. Bolivia has also dictated mandatory salary increases for both public and private companies, affecting the profitability of our company in Bolivia, COBEE. For further information on the risks related to the Bolivian governments recent nationalization of certain generation companies, see The Government of Bolivia has nationalized energy industry assets, and our remaining operations in Bolivia may also be nationalized .
Our failure to comply with existing regulations and legislation, or reinterpretations of existing regulations and new legislation or regulations, such as those relating to the reduction of anti-competitive conduct, air and water quality, ecological waterflow for hydroelectric plants, noise avoidance, electromagnetic radiation, fuel and other storage facilities, volatile materials, renewable portfolio standards, cyber security, emissions or air quality social responsibility, obligations or public consultations, performance standards, climate change, hazardous and solid waste transportation and disposal, protected species and other environmental matters, or changes in the nature of the energy regulatory process may have a significant adverse impact on our financial results.
43
The Government of Bolivia has nationalized energy industry assets, and our remaining operations in Bolivia may also be nationalized.
Bolivia has experienced political and economic instability that has resulted in significant changes in its general economic policies and regulations and the adoption of a new constitution in 2006 that, among other things, prohibits private ownership of certain oil and gas resources. In May 2010, the Government of Bolivia nationalized Empresa Eléctrica Guaracachi S.A., or Guaracachi, Empresa Eléctrica Valle Hermoso S.A., or Valle Hermoso and Empresa Eléctrica Corani S.A., or Corani, each a significant generation company in Bolivia. In May 2012, the Government of Bolivia nationalized Transportadora de Electricidad S.A., a transmission company that had previously operated as a subsidiary of Red Eléctrica de España. In December 2012, Electricidad de La Paz S.A. (Electropaz) and Empresa de Luz y Fuerza de Oruro S.A. (Elfeo)companies which had no previous ownership relationship with the Government of Boliviawere also nationalized.
Although there were elections in Bolivia during the third quarter of 2014, and such elections resulted in the re-election of certain key government officials, it is unclear whether the Government of Bolivia will continue nationalizing entities involved in its power utility market. It is also unclear whether such nationalization (if any) would be adequately compensated for by the Government of Bolivia. Our subsidiary COBEE is one of the few remaining privately-held generation companies in Bolivia. Although we believe our circumstances differ from those of the nationalized generation companies (because COBEE was not previously owned by the Bolivian government), there is a risk that COBEE will be subject to nationalization. Such nationalization may include the expropriation or nullification of our existing concessions, licenses, permits, agreements and contracts, as well as effective nationalization resulting from changes in Bolivian regulatory restrictions or taxes, among other things, that could have an adverse impact on COBEEs profitability. If COBEE were indeed nationalized, we cannot assure you that we would receive fair compensation for our interests in COBEE.
We could face nationalization risks in other countries as well. The nationalization of any of our operating companies or power generation plants, even if fair compensation for such nationalization is received, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Our business and profitability may be adversely affected if water rights are limited or denied.
Certain of our generation facilities rely on hydroelectric power generation. For instance, in Bolivia, our COBEE facilities generate power from, among others, ten run-of-the-river hydroelectric plants in the Zongo river valley and four run-of-the-river hydroelectric plants in the Miguillas river valley. In addition, we are currently developing CDAs plant, a 510 MW run-of-the-river hydroelectric project in Peru.
We own water rights in Bolivia granted by the Bolivian Ministry of Energy and Hydrocarbons and in Peru, granted by the National Water Authority ( ANAAutoridad Nacional del Agua ). From time to time, local governments and regulators may amend regulations pertaining to water rights. Furthermore, we may be unable to obtain, or otherwise experience difficulty in obtaining, water rights in connection with the construction of new hydroelectric plants, which may impact the viability, design, timing or profitability of a project. Local governments may also try to impose a royalty or tariff for water use on our hydroelectric plants. In addition, several plants are required to leave a percentage of the water available in the river and therefore may not utilize such water in their generation activities (this reserve is commonly referred to as the ecological waterflow). Local governments may decide to enact a change in the regulation or in the calculation of the ecological waterflow, thereby reducing available volumes of water for power generation in our plants. Any limitations on our current water rights, our ability to obtain additional water rights, or our ability to effectively utilize our existing rights, could have a material adverse effect on our current hydroelectric plants and our hydroelectric projects.
44
Our equipment, facilities, operations and new projects are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations.
We are subject to a broad range of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations which require us to incur ongoing costs and capital expenditures and expose us to substantial liabilities in the event of non-compliance. These laws and regulations require us to, among other things, minimize risks to the natural and social environment while maintaining the quality, safety and efficiency of our facilities. Furthermore, as our operations are subject to various operational hazards, including personal injury and the loss of life, we are subject to laws and regulations that provide for the health and safety of our employees.
These laws and regulations also require us to obtain and maintain environmental permits, licenses and approvals for the construction of new facilities or the installation and operation of new equipment required for our business. Some of these permits, licenses and approvals are subject to periodic renewal. Government environmental agencies could take enforcement actions against us for any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations. Such enforcement actions could include, among other things, the imposition of fines, revocation of licenses, suspension of operations or imposition of criminal liability for non-compliance. Environmental laws and regulations can also impose strict liability for the environmental remediation of spills and discharges of hazardous materials and wastes and require us to indemnify or reimburse third parties for environmental damages. As fuel leaks may occur when fuel is received from containerships at sea (as is the case for fuel received in El Salvador and the Dominican Republic), sea water may be inadvertently polluted at the time of fuel receipt; our primary operational environmental risk relates to the potential leaking of such fuel. Although we have operating procedures in place to minimize this, and other, environmental risks, there is no assurance that such procedures will prove successful in avoiding inadvertent spills or discharges.
We expect the enforcement of environmental, health and safety rules to become more stringent over time, making our ability to comply with the applicable requirements and obtain permits and licenses in a timely fashion more difficult. Additionally, compliance with changed or new environmental, health and safety regulations could require us to make significant capital investments in additional pollution controls or process modifications. These expenditures may not be recoverable and may consequently divert funds away from planned investments in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
While we intend to adopt, and believe that each of our businesses has adopted, appropriate risk management and compliance programs, the nature of our operations means that legal and compliance risks will continue to exist and additional legal proceedings and other contingencies, the outcome of which cannot be predicted with certainty, will arise from time to time. No assurances can be made that we will be found to be operating in compliance with, or be able to detect violations of, any existing or future laws or regulations. A failure to comply with or properly anticipate applicable laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
In the case of new project developments, environmental or other regulations may change during the course of our development of such projects, potentially increasing the costs of such projects or making them inviable projects for completion.
Foreign exchange rate fluctuations and controls could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and the strength of our balance sheet.
Through our businesses, we have facilities and generate costs and revenues in a number of countries in Latin America, the Caribbean and Israel. Although our costs and revenues are generally denominated in the U.S. Dollar, or are linked to the U.S. Dollar as a result of our PPAs or supply agreements, OPCs revenues, operating expenses, assets and liabilities are denominated in New Israeli Shekels. Therefore, significant fluctuations in the New Israeli Shekel against the U.S. Dollar could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and the strength of our balance sheet. In our other countries of operation, which generally have a direct
45
or indirect link to the U.S. Dollar, the effects of the indexation may materialize on a delayed basis or may require a minimum threshold to be triggered; inflationary pressures, which impact exchange rate fluctuations, may also impact our margins to the extent that cost increases driven by inflation are not accompanied by corresponding increases in the price of electricity or capacity sold. In addition, some costs, such as payroll and taxes, are normally denominated in local currency, and this denomination exposes us to the foreign exchange fluctuations of the relevant local currency vis-a-vis the U.S. Dollar.
Furthermore, our businesses may pay distributions or make payments to us in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, which we must convert to U.S. Dollars prior to making dividends or other distributions to our shareholders if we decide to make any distributions in the future. Foreign exchange controls in countries in which our businesses operate may further limit our ability to repatriate funds or otherwise convert local currencies into U.S. Dollars. Although exchange rates within Peru, for example, are determined by market conditions, with regular purchase and sale operations by the Peruvian Central Reserve Bank ( Banco Central de Reserva del Perú ) in the foreign exchange market in order to reduce volatility in the value of Perus currency against the U.S. dollar, this has not always been the case. Should the relevant regulatory bodies in any of the countries in which we operate institute protectionist and interventionist laws and policies or restrictive exchange rate policies in the future, such policies could have a material adverse effect on our operating companies or our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Consequently, as with any international business, our liquidity, earnings, expenses, asset book value, and/or amount of equity may be materially affected by short-term or long-term exchange rate movements or controls. Such movements may give rise to, among other risks, translation risk, which exists where the currency in which the results of a business are reported differs from the underlying currency in which the business operations are transacted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Our growth may be limited by antitrust laws.
We have acquired a number of operating power generation companies. In the future, we may seek to expand our operations within any of the countries in which we currently, or may in the future, operate. Government policies, specifically antitrust and competition laws in these relevant countries, can impact our ability to execute this strategy successfully.
In Peru, for example, INDECOPI, the Peruvian antitrust regulator, reviews acquisition agreements that may result in vertical or horizontal market concentration in the electricity sector and, in connection with such review, may, impose conditions upon the parties to such agreements.
Similarly, in Israel, the Antitrust Authority is authorized to prevent market power accumulation through the regulation of mergers in Israel. Additionally, our expansion activities in Israel may be limited by the Law for Promotion of Competition and Reduction of Concentration 2013, or the Concentration Law. Pursuant to such law, if we, or a company controlled by us, intends to obtain or purchase a license for the production of electricity in the future for a power plant which exceeds 175 MW, such obtainment or purchase will be subject to the procedures set forth in the Concentration Law, the PUAE, and the Ministry of National Infrastructures, Energy and Water Resources, which will consider how such obtainment or purchase may affect the concentration in the power generation market. According to the guidelines published by the PUAE in March 2015: (1) the maximum capacity of electricity production facilities, using conventional and cogeneration technologies, held or controlled by one person, is capped, and (2) a person may not hold or control a dominant market share in a production technology. Entities deemed to be under common control with us would be considered capacity of a single person. Therefore, the capacity of entities which may be considered to be under common control with us may prevent IC Power from effecting certain acquisitions or otherwise increasing our operations in Israel.
Additionally, we may consider disposing of certain assets, or equity interests in certain of our operating assets, to further our development and operational expansion. Such dispositions may also be impacted by antitrust and competition laws in the countries in which we operate, if the acquirers of such interest have
46
significant interests in the power generation market, or the purported transaction may cross any of the applicable legal thresholds. For example, our 2014 sale of our 21% indirect interest in Edegel to Edegels indirect controlling shareholder was subject to regulatory approval from INDECOPI.
We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws outside of the United States.
The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials or other persons for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Recent years have seen a substantial increase in anti-bribery law enforcement activity, with more frequent and aggressive investigations and enforcement proceedings by both the Department of Justice and the SEC, increased enforcement activity by non-U.S. regulators, and increases in criminal and civil proceedings brought against companies and individuals. Our policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws. We operate, through our businesses, in countries that are recognized as having governmental and commercial corruption. Additionally, because many of our customers and end users are involved in infrastructure construction and energy production, they are often subject to increased scrutiny by regulators. We cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will protect us from reckless or criminal acts committed by our employees, the employees of any of our businesses, or third party intermediaries. In the event that we believe or have reason to believe that our employees or agents have or may have violated applicable anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA, we may be required to investigate or have outside counsel investigate the relevant facts and circumstances, which can be expensive and require significant time and attention from senior management. Violations of these laws may result in criminal or civil sanctions, inability to do business with existing or future business partners (either as a result of express prohibitions or to avoid the appearance of impropriety), injunctions against future conduct, profit disgorgements, disqualifications from directly or indirectly engaging in certain types of businesses, the loss of business permits or other restrictions which could disrupt our business and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.
Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure
We are incorporated in Singapore and our shareholders may have greater difficulty in protecting their interests than they would as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in the United States.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our memorandum and articles of association and by the laws governing corporations incorporated in Singapore. The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of the members of our board of directors under Singapore law are different from those applicable to a corporation incorporated in the United States. Therefore, our public shareholders may have greater difficulty in protecting their interests in connection with actions taken by our management or members of our board of directors than they would as shareholders of a corporation incorporated in the United States. For example, under Singapore corporate law, only persons who are registered shareholders in our register of members are recognized under Singapore law as our shareholders; only shareholders have legal standing to institute actions against us or otherwise seek to enforce their rights as shareholders. For further information on these, and other differences, between Singapore and Delaware corporation law, see Description of Share CapitalComparison of Shareholder Rights .
It may be difficult to enforce a judgment of U.S. courts for civil liabilities under U.S. federal securities laws against us, our directors or officers in Singapore.
We are incorporated under the laws of Singapore and our officers and certain of our directors are or will be residents outside of the United States. Moreover, a significant portion of our assets and the assets of our directors and officers and certain other persons named in this prospectus are located outside of the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process within the United States upon these persons.
47
Although we are incorporated outside the United States, in August 2015, we entered into an appointment agreement with C T Corporation System, whereby we irrevocably appointed C T Corporation System to receive on our behalf service of process in respect of any suit, action or proceeding in any state or federal court sitting in the United States arising out of or in connection with this prospectus. However, since all of the assets owned by us, and a significant portion of our assets and our directors and officers and certain other persons named in this prospectus, are located outside of the United States, any judgment obtained in the United States against us may not be collectible within the United States. It may also be difficult for you to enforce judgments obtained in the United States in countries outside of the United States predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States against us and our non-U.S. resident officers and directors. In addition, there is uncertainty as to whether these courts would recognize or enforce judgments of U.S. courts against us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the securities laws of the United States. It is also uncertain whether such courts would be competent to hear original actions brought against us or other persons predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any other state.
Furthermore, there is no treaty between the United States and Singapore providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, such that a final judgment for the payment of money rendered by any federal or state court in the United States based on civil liability, whether or not predicated solely upon the federal securities laws, would, therefore, not be automatically enforceable in Singapore. Additionally, there is doubt whether a Singapore court may impose civil liability or any punitive damages permitted in the U.S. on us or our directors and officers who reside in Singapore in a suit brought in the Singapore courts against us or such persons with respect to a violation solely of the federal securities laws of the United States.
In addition, holders of book-entry interests in our ordinary shares ( i.e. those investors who hold our shares indirectly through custodians) will be required to be registered shareholders as reflected in our register of members in order to have legal standing to bring an action as shareholders and, if successful, to enforce a foreign judgment against us, our directors or our officers in the Singapore courts. Such process could result in administrative delays which may be prejudicial to any legal proceeding or enforcement action.
We are subject to the laws of Singapore, which differ in certain material respects from the laws of the United States.
As a Singapore-incorporated company, we are required to comply with the laws of Singapore, certain of which are capable of extra-territorial application, as well as our memorandum and articles of association. The application of Singapore law, including the Securities and Futures Act of Singapore, or the SFA, Singapore Code on Take-over and Mergers and the Singapore Companies Act, may in certain circumstances impose more stringent requirements on us, our shareholders, directors or officers than would otherwise be applicable to a U.S.-incorporated company. The provisions of the SFA prohibit certain forms of market conduct and information disclosures, and impose criminal and civil penalties on corporations, directors and officers in respect of any breach of such provisions.
Additionally, the corporate laws of Singapore and of the United States differ in certain significant respects. As a result, the rights of our shareholders and the obligations of our directors and officers under Singapore law are different from those applicable to a U.S.-incorporated company in material respects, and our shareholders may have more difficulty and less clarity in protecting their interests in connection with actions taken by our management, members of our board of directors or our significant shareholders than would otherwise apply to a U.S.-incorporated company. For further information on these differences, see Description of Share Capital Comparison of Shareholder Rights .
48
We are a foreign private issuer under U.S. securities laws and, as a result, are subject to disclosure obligations that are different from those applicable to U.S. domestic registrants listed on the NYSE.
We are incorporated under the laws of Singapore and, as such, will be considered a foreign private issuer under U.S. securities laws. Although we will be subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, the periodic disclosure required of foreign private issuers under the Exchange Act is different from the periodic disclosure required of U.S. domestic registrants. Therefore, there may be less publicly available information about us than is regularly published by or about other public companies in the United States. We are also exempt from certain other sections of the Exchange Act that U.S. domestic registrants are otherwise subject to, including the requirement to provide our shareholders with information statements or proxy statements that comply with the Exchange Act. Moreover, we are not required to comply with Regulation FD, which restricts the selective disclosure of material information. These exemptions and leniencies may reduce the frequency and scope of information and protections to which you may otherwise have been eligible in you held ordinary shares or common stock of a domestic U.S. issuer.
In addition, insiders and large shareholders of ours will be exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act and will not be obligated to file the reports required by Section 16 of the Exchange Act.
We would lose our foreign private issuer status if a majority of our shares became held by U.S. persons and a majority of our directors or executive officers are U.S. citizens or residents and we fail to meet additional requirements necessary to avoid loss of foreign private issuer status. Although we have elected to comply with domestic NYSE corporate governance rules applicable to U.S. domestic listed companies, our loss of foreign private issuer status would make such provisions mandatory. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws as a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly higher. If we are not a foreign private issuer, we will be required to file periodic reports and registration statements on U.S. domestic issuer forms with the SEC and prepare our financial statements under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, which are more detailed and extensive than the forms available to a foreign private issuer. To the extent we had not already done so, we may also be required to modify certain of our policies to comply with accepted governance practices associated with U.S. domestic issuers and may lose our ability to rely upon exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements on the NYSE that are available to foreign private issuers.
As a foreign private issuer and a controlled company, we may, in the future, follow certain home country corporate governance, or controlled company, practices instead of otherwise applicable NYSE corporate governance requirements, and this may result in less investor protection than that accorded to investors under rules applicable to domestic non-controlled U.S. issuers.
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of those otherwise required under the NYSEs rules for domestic U.S. issuers, provided that we disclose which requirements we are not following and describe the equivalent home country requirement. For example, foreign private issuers are permitted to follow home country practice with regard to director nomination procedures and the approval of compensation of officers. Additionally, we are not required to maintain a board comprised of a majority of independent directors. We also expect to be a controlled company within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the NYSE. However, notwithstanding our ability to follow the corporate governance practices of our home country Singapore, we have elected to comply with the corporate governance rules of the NYSE that are applicable to U.S. domestic registrants that are not controlled companies. Nevertheless, we may, in the future, decide to rely on the foreign private issuer or controlled company exemptions provided by the NYSE and follow home country corporate or controlled company governance practices in lieu of complying with some or all of the NYSEs requirements.
Availing ourselves of any of these exemptions, as opposed to complying with the requirements that are applicable to a non-controlled U.S. domestic registrant, may provide less protection to you than is accorded to
49
investors under the NYSEs corporate governance rules. Therefore, any foreign private issuer or controlled company exemptions we avail ourselves of in the future may reduce the scope of information and protection to which you are otherwise entitled as an investor.
Singapore corporate law may impede a takeover of our Company by a third party, which could adversely affect the value of our ordinary shares.
The Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers and Sections 138, 139 and 140 of the Securities and Futures Act, Chapter 289 of Singapore contain certain provisions that may delay, deter or prevent a future takeover or change in control of our Company for so long as we remain a public company with more than 50 shareholders and net tangible assets of S$5 million (approximately $4 million) or more. Any person acquiring an interest, whether by a series of transactions over a period of time or not, either on his own or together with parties acting in concert with such person, in 30% or more of our voting shares, or, if such person holds, either on his own or together with parties acting in concert with such person, between 30% and 50% (both inclusive) of our voting shares, and such person (or parties acting in concert with such person) acquires additional voting shares representing more than 1% of our voting shares in any six-month period, must, except with the consent of the Securities Industry Council in Singapore, extend a mandatory takeover offer for the remaining voting shares in accordance with the provisions of the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers. While the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers seeks to ensure equality of treatment among shareholders, its provisions may discourage or prevent certain types of transactions involving an actual or threatened change of control of our Company. These legal requirements may impede or delay a takeover of our Company by a third party, and thereby have a material adverse effect on the value of our ordinary shares.
We expect to submit an application to the Securities Industry Council of Singapore for a waiver from the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers so that the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers will not apply to us (except in the case of a tender offer (within the meaning of the U.S. securities laws) where the U.S. Tier I exemption under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is available and the offeror relies on the Tier I exemption to avoid full compliance with U.S. tender offer regulations) for so long as we are not listed on a securities exchange in Singapore. We will make an appropriate announcement when the result of the application is known.
Our directors have general authority to allot and issue new shares on terms and conditions and with any preferences, rights or restrictions as may be determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion.
Under Singapore law, we may only allot and issue new shares with the prior approval of our shareholders in a general meeting. Subject to the general authority to allot and issue new shares provided by our shareholders, the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and our memorandum and articles of association, our board of directors may allot and issue new shares on terms and conditions and with the rights (including preferential voting rights) and restrictions as they may think fit to impose. Any additional issuances of new shares by our directors could adversely impact the market price of our ordinary shares.
We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company, which could result in adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. holders of our ordinary shares.
Generally, if for any taxable year, 75% or more of our gross income is passive income, or at least 50% of our assets are held for the production of, or produce, passive income, we would be characterized as a passive foreign investment company for United States federal income tax purposes. There can be no assurance that we will not be considered a passive foreign investment company for any taxable year. If we are characterized as a passive foreign investment company, our U.S. shareholders may suffer adverse tax consequences, including having gains realized on the sale of our ordinary shares treated as ordinary income, rather than capital gain, the loss of the preferential rate applicable to dividends received on our ordinary shares by individuals who are U.S. holders, and having interest charges apply to distributions by us and the proceeds of share sales. For further information on such U.S. tax implications, see TaxationMaterial U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations .
50
Tax regulations and examinations could have a material adverse effect on us and we may be subject to challenges by tax authorities.
We operate in a number of countries and are therefore regularly examined by and remain subject to numerous tax regulations. Changes in our global mix of earnings could affect our effective tax rate. Furthermore, changes in tax laws could result in higher tax-related expenses and payments. Legislative changes in any of the countries in which our businesses operate could materially impact our tax receivables and liabilities as well as deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. Additionally, the uncertain tax environment in some regions in which our businesses operate could limit our ability to enforce our rights. Some of our businesses operate in countries with complex tax rules, which may be interpreted in a variety of ways and could affect our effective tax rate. Future interpretations or developments of tax regimes or a higher than anticipated effective tax rate could have a material adverse effect on our tax liability, return on investments and business operations.
In addition, we and our businesses operate in, are incorporated in and are tax residents of, various jurisdictions. The tax authorities in the various jurisdictions in which we and our businesses operate, or are incorporated, may disagree with and challenge our assessments of our transactions, tax position, deductions, exemptions, where we or our subsidiaries or businesses are tax resident, or other matters. If we, or our businesses, are unsuccessful in responding to any such challenge from a tax authority, we, or our businesses, may be required to pay additional taxes, interest, fines or penalties, we, or our businesses, may be subject to taxes for the same business in more than one jurisdiction or may also be subject to higher tax rates, withholding or other taxes. Even if we, or our businesses, are successful, responding to such challenges may be expensive, consume time and other resources, or divert managements time and focus from our operations or businesses or from the operations of our businesses. Therefore, a challenge as to our, or our businesses, tax position or status or transactions, even if unsuccessful, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity or the business, financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of our businesses.
Risks Related to Our Ordinary Shares and this Offering
There may be circumstances in which the interests of our controlling shareholder could be in conflict with your interests as a shareholder.
Kenon currently owns 100% of our ordinary shares and, upon completion of this offering, will beneficially own % of our ordinary shares and voting power, or % of our ordinary shares and voting power, if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional ordinary shares from us. As a result of this ownership, Kenon will have a continuing ability to control our affairs and its voting power will constitute a quorum of our shareholders voting on any matter requiring the approval of our shareholders. Kenon will continue to have significant influence over our affairs for the foreseeable future, including with respect to the nomination and election of directors, the issuance of additional ordinary shares or payment of dividends, the consummation of significant corporate transactions, such as the adoption of amendments to our memorandum and articles of association and organizational regulations and approval of mergers or sales of substantially all of our assets.
In certain circumstances, Kenons interests as a principal shareholder, may conflict with the interests of our other shareholders. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may harm the market price of our ordinary shares by, among other things:
| delaying, defending, or preventing a change of control, even at a per share price that is in excess of the then current price of our ordinary shares; |
| impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover, or other business combination involving us, even at a per share price that is in excess of the then current price of our ordinary shares; or |
51
| discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, even at a per share price that is in excess of the then current price of our ordinary shares. |
Kenon may also cause corporate actions to be taken that conflict with the interests of our other shareholders.
If we fail to develop or maintain an effective system of disclosure controls and internal control over financial reporting, our ability to produce timely and accurate consolidated financial statements or comply with applicable regulations could be impaired.
As a public company, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the listing standards of the NYSE. We expect that the requirements of these rules and regulations will increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time consuming and costly, and place significant strain on our personnel, systems and resources.
Among other things, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that, as a public company, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer certify the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and, beginning with our second annual report as a public company, our internal controls over financial reporting. We continue to develop and refine our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting; however, we have not yet assessed our internal control over financial reporting. Material weaknesses in our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting may be discovered in the future. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls, or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our consolidated financial statements for prior periods. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting also could adversely affect the results of management evaluations and independent registered public accounting firm audits of our internal control over financial reporting. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures or ineffective internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which may have a negative effect on the trading price of our ordinary shares.
Because there is no existing market for our ordinary shares, our initial public offering price may not be indicative of the market price of our ordinary shares after this offering, an active trading market in our ordinary shares may not develop or be sustained and the market price of our ordinary shares could fluctuate significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
There is currently no public market for our ordinary shares, and an active trading market may not develop or be sustained after this offering. Our initial public offering price has been determined through negotiation between us and the underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price for our ordinary shares after this offering. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in us will lead to the development of an active trading market on the NYSE. The lack of an active market may reduce the value of your shares and impair your ability to sell your shares at the time or price at which you wish to sell them. An inactive market may also impair our ability to raise capital by selling our ordinary shares and may impair our ability to acquire or invest in other companies, products or technologies by using our ordinary shares as consideration.
In addition, the market price of our ordinary shares could fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of factors, including:
| fluctuations in our financial performance; |
| economic and stock market conditions generally and specifically as they may impact us, participants in our industry or comparable companies; |
52
| changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts following our ordinary shares or comparable companies; |
| earnings and other announcements by, and changes in market evaluations of, us, participants in our industry or comparable companies; |
| our ability to meet or exceed any future earnings guidance we may issue; |
| changes in business or regulatory conditions affecting us, participants in our industry or comparable companies; |
| changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance, interpretations or principles; |
| announcements or implementation by our competitors or us of acquisitions, technological innovations, or other strategic actions by our competitors; or |
| trading volume of our ordinary shares or sales of shares by our management team, directors or principal shareholders. |
These and other factors could limit or prevent investors from readily selling their ordinary shares or otherwise negatively affect the liquidity of our ordinary shares, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
We will incur increased costs as a result of becoming a public company.
As a public company, we will incur legal, accounting, insurance and other expenses that we have not incurred as a private company, including costs associated with public company reporting requirements. We also have incurred and will incur costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules implemented by the SEC. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and to make some activities more time-consuming and costly, although we are currently unable to estimate these costs with any degree of certainty. These and other laws and regulations could also make it more difficult or costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. These and other laws and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as our senior management. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of our ordinary shares, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation.
The market price of our ordinary shares could be adversely affected by future sales of our ordinary shares or the perception that such sales may occur.
Kenon will hold % of our ordinary shares upon completion of the offering (or % if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional ordinary shares from us) and Kenons strategy is to provide its shareholders with direct access to its primary businesses, which includes ICP. Following expiration of the 180-day lockup period (or earlier, if the underwriters consent) Kenon will be under no contractual restriction on sales of its shares.
Sales or issuances of a substantial number of our ordinary shares following this offering or the perception that such sales or distributions might occur, could cause a decline in the market price of our ordinary shares or could impair our ability to obtain capital through a subsequent offering of our equity securities or securities convertible into equity securities. Under our articles of association that will be in effect upon closing of this offering, we are authorized to issue up to ordinary shares, of which ordinary shares will be outstanding upon the closing of this offering (or ordinary shares if the underwriters option to purchase additional ordinary shares is exercised in full). Of these shares, the ordinary shares sold in this offering will be freely
53
transferable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, or the Securities Act, except for any ordinary shares held by our affiliates (including Kenon) as defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
We will grant registration rights to Kenon, enabling it to require us to file a registration statement to register sales of our ordinary shares held by Kenon, subject to certain conditions. Registration of these ordinary shares under the Securities Act would result in shares becoming freely tradeable without restriction under the Securities Act, except for shares purchased by affiliates. Kenon may also choose to establish programmed selling plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the Exchange Act, for the purpose of effecting sales of our ordinary shares.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish negative reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our ordinary shares will depend, in part, upon the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our businesses. We do not have any control over analysts as to whether they will cover us, and if they do, whether such coverage will continue. If analysts do not commence coverage of us, or if one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our Company or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to decline. In addition, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our ordinary shares or change their opinion of our ordinary shares, our share price may likely decline.
We may issue additional ordinary shares in the future, which may dilute our existing shareholders. We may also issue securities that have rights and privileges that are more favorable than the rights and privileges accorded to our existing shareholders.
We may issue additional securities in the future, including ordinary shares and options, rights, warrants and other convertible securities for any purpose and for such consideration and on such terms and conditions as we may determine appropriate or necessary, including in connection with equity awards, financings or other strategic transactions. Subject to the annual approval of our shareholders for (1) the creation of new classes of shares, and (2) the granting to our directors of the authority to issue new shares with different or similar rights, and without prejudice to any special right previously conferred on the holders of any of our existing shares or class of shares, and other than with respect to the issuance of shares pursuant to awards made under our Share Incentive Plan 2015 or Share Option Plan 2015, our board of directors will be able to determine the class, designations, preferences, rights and powers of any additional shares, including any rights to share in our profits, losses and dividends or other distributions, any rights to receive assets upon our dissolution or liquidation and any redemption, conversion and exchange rights. Kenon, our significant shareholder, may use its ability to control, or exert influence over, our board of directors to cause us to issue additional ordinary shares, which would dilute existing holders of our ordinary shares, or to issue securities with rights and privileges that are more favorable than those of our ordinary shareholders. There are no statutory rights of first refusal for new share issuances conferred upon our shareholders under the Singapore Companies Act.
As a newly-incorporated company, we will not have distributable profits to pay dividends.
Under Singapore law and our articles of association, dividends, whether in cash or in specie, must be paid out of our profits available for distribution or in excess of the amount recommended by our directors. As a newly-incorporated company, we do not expect to have distributable profits from which dividends may be declared. The availability of distributable profits is assessed on the basis of our standalone unconsolidated accounts (which will be based upon the Singapore Financial Reporting Standards, or the SFRS) and we expect that the opening balance of our retained earnings in such financials will be zero. Therefore, unless we effect a capital reduction, we will be unable to pay dividends to our shareholders unless and until we have generated sufficient distributable reserves. We may incur losses and therefore may not have distributable income that might be distributed to our shareholders as a dividend or other distribution in the foreseeable future. As a result, and
54
until such time, if ever, that we declare dividends with respect to our ordinary shares, a holder of our ordinary shares will only realize income from an investment in our ordinary shares if there is an increase in the market price of our ordinary shares. Any potential increase is uncertain and unpredictable.
Under Singapore law, it is possible to effect a capital reduction exercise up to the value of our ordinary shares, to return cash and/or assets to our shareholders. The completion of a capital reduction exercise, however, may require the approval of the Singapore Courts and we may not be successful in our attempts to obtain such approval.
Any dividend payments on our ordinary shares would be declared in U.S. Dollars, and any shareholder whose principal currency is not the U.S. Dollar would be subject to exchange rate fluctuations.
The ordinary shares will be traded in, and any cash dividends or other distributions to be declared in respect of them, if any, will be denominated, in U.S. Dollars. Shareholders whose principal currency is not the U.S. Dollar will be exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk. Any depreciation of the U.S. Dollar in relation to such foreign currency will reduce the value of such shareholders ordinary shares and any appreciation of the U.S. Dollar will increase the value in foreign currency terms. In addition, we will not offer our shareholders the option to elect to receive dividends, if any, in any other currency. Consequently, our shareholders may be required to arrange their own foreign currency exchange, either through a brokerage house or otherwise, which could incur additional commissions or expenses.
55
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus contains forward-looking statements that reflect our current expectations and views of future events. Forward-looking statements are contained principally in the sections titled Prospectus Summary , Risk Factors , Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations , Industry and Business . Some of these forward-looking statements can be identified by terms and phrases such as anticipate, aim, should, likely, foresee, believe, estimate, expect, intend, continue, could, may, plan, project, predict, will, shall and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements relating to:
| our goals, and strategies and the goals and strategies of our businesses; |
| potential projects, including the location and nature of such projects; |
| our capital commitments and/or intentions with respect to certain of our operating businesses, including the sufficiency of our liquidity and capital resources; |
| the nature and extent of future competition in the energy industry in the markets in which we operate; |
| our ability to finance existing, and to source and finance new, greenfield projects and acquisitions; |
| the expected cost and expected timing of completion of existing projects and the anticipated capacity, load factor, and results of such projects; |
| the expected timing, completion, and terms of certain acquisitions, including the assignment of certain supply and/or transmission agreements; |
| our ability to secure appropriate licenses, including water rights, for any acquisitions or greenfield projects; |
| the price of, and our ability to successfully integrate, acquired businesses; |
| our ability to successfully pursue greenfield projects and acquisition opportunities; |
| our ability to source, enter into and/or renew long-term PPAs and EPC agreements, as applicable, and the amounts to be paid under such agreements; |
| our ability to renew and/or enter into supply, transmission and/or distribution agreements on competitive terms, as such agreements expire; |
| our ability to secure raw materials, including fuel, to operate our power generation plants; |
| the performance and reliability of our generation plants and our ability to manage our operation and maintenance costs; |
| expected trends in the countries in which each of our businesses operate, including trends relating to the growth of a particular market, supply and demand imbalances, and investments in power generation facilities; |
| expected or potential changes in tariffs, which may impact our revenues or Adjusted EBITDA; |
56
| the impact of fuel price and foreign exchange rate fluctuations on our revenues and operating margins; |
| expected growth in demand for energy in the markets that we serve; |
| terms of gas and other supply contracts and our ability to continue to procure gas and other inputs on competitive terms and the ability of our plants to operate using alternate fuels; |
| the availability and prices of natural gas and other fuels purchased by, or in competition with, our business; |
| the political and macroeconomic outlook for each of the countries in which we operate, many of which are emerging markets, and the impact on our businesses of such conditions; |
| forecasts in respect of the Dominican Republics economy and the impact any economic growth may have on our accounts receivables; |
| the legal and regulatory framework of the energy industry at the national, regional or municipal level in one or more of the countries in which we operate, develop or construct generation assets; |
| new types of taxes or increases or decreases in taxes applicable to us or our businesses; |
| the potential expropriation or nationalization of our operating assets by foreign governments, with or without adequate compensation; |
| our ability to utilize our PPAs, fuel supply and other agreements to hedge against fuel price and exchange rate fluctuations; |
| increased development costs, and the impact such increased costs could have on the development of additional power generation assets and the value of our assets, particularly with respect to hydroelectric power plants (such as the CDA plant); |
| the effect of weather conditions on generation, consumer energy use, tariffs, or our operating costs; |
| adequacy of our insurance coverage; |
| litigation and/or regulatory proceedings or developments and our expectations with respect to such litigation, proceedings, developments and/or awards, including the impact of our release of certain provisions; |
| our distributable reserves and our ability to distribute dividends to our shareholders; |
| our expectations regarding the use of proceeds from this initial public offering; and |
| other factors identified or discussed under Risk Factors . |
Although we base these statements on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable when made, these forward-looking statements are not a guarantee of performance, and you should not place undue reliance on such statements. These statements are only predictions based upon our current expectations and projections about future events. Forward-looking statements are subject to many uncertainties and other variable circumstances, many of which are outside of our control, that could cause our actual results and experience to differ materially from those we thought would occur.
57
These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this prospectus. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You should read this prospectus and the documents filed as exhibits to the registration statement, of which this prospectus is a part, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect.
There are important factors that could cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, level of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. In particular, you should consider the numerous risks provided under Risk Factors in this prospectus.
58
CORPORATE FORMATION AND REORGANIZATION
We were incorporated in May 2015 to serve as the holding company of ICP and its businesses.
Prior to the completion of the offering, Kenon, our sole shareholder, will effect a Reorganization pursuant to which it will transfer all of its equity interests in its wholly-owned subsidiary ICP, to us, in exchange for (i) receipt of our ordinary shares issued for such purpose and (ii) receipt of a note payable by us to Kenon in an aggregate principal amount of $220 million. Additionally, prior to the completion of this offering, we will be converted into a Singapore public company limited by shares and renamed . The graphics below represent a simplified summary of our organizational structure, excluding intermediate holding companies, immediately prior to and immediately after the Reorganization and prior to the completion of this offering.
Prior to the Completion of the Reorganization | After the Completion of the Reorganization | |
|
|
As set forth in Use of Proceeds , we will use a portion of the net proceeds raised in this offering to prepay in full all obligations under our note payable to Kenon.
59
Assuming an initial public offering price of $ per share, which is the midpoint of the offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, we estimate that the net proceeds to us from the sale of our ordinary shares in this offering will be approximately $ million (or $ million if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional ordinary shares from us), after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses.
We intend to use the net proceeds that we receive in this offering, along with readily available cash, (1) to develop greenfield projects, (2) to acquire companies or assets in the electricity sector ( e.g ., generation, transmission or distribution companies or assets), (3) to prepay in full all obligations under our note payable to Kenon (which will be in an aggregate principal amount of $220 million), which note will be issued to Kenon as part of the consideration for Kenons contribution of ICP to us in connection with the Reorganization, will bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 6% per annum from the earlier of June 30, 2016 or 21 days after the completion of this offering, and will mature, unless otherwise prepaid, on December 31, 2016 and (4) general corporate purposes.
Other than with respect to our prepayment in full of all obligations under our $220 million note payable to Kenon, the amount and timing of our actual use of the net proceeds that we will receive from this offering, and the amount of cash from other sources that we intend to use, if any, in connection with the uses stated above, will depend upon numerous factors, including the cash used in or generated by our operations, the level of our expansion efforts, our ability to identify greenfield development projects or companies or assets to acquire, the development and / or acquisition expenses related to such projects, companies, or assets, as well as the results of our existing development efforts. Our management has discretion over many of these factors. Except as specified above, we are unable to estimate the amount of the net proceeds from this offering that will be used for any of the purposes described above and therefore will have broad discretion in using these proceeds.
For further information on the greenfield development and acquisition opportunities under current assessment and the status of our development efforts, see BusinessPotential Projects .
From time to time, our board of directors may approve the payment of dividends to our shareholders. Under Singapore law and our articles of association, dividends, whether in cash or in specie, must be paid out of our profits. The declaration and payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including our profits, our financial position, earnings, cash flows, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, the progress relating to our strategy plan, statutory and contractual restrictions applicable to the payment of dividends, the conditions prevailing in the market, our overall financial condition, available distributable reserves, and additional factors our board of directors deems appropriate. Additionally, because we are a holding company, our ability to pay cash dividends, or declare a distribution-in-kind of the ordinary shares of any of our businesses, may be limited by restrictions on our ability to obtain sufficient funds through dividends from our businesses, including restrictions under the terms of the agreements governing the indebtedness of our businesses.
Dividend payments are not guaranteed and our board of directors may decide, in its absolute discretion, at any time and for any reason, not to pay dividends. Therefore, you may not receive funds without selling your ordinary shares. Any dividends declared on our ordinary shares will be declared and paid in U.S. dollars.
Under Singapore law and our articles of association, dividends, whether in cash or in specie, must be paid out of our profits available for distribution or in excess of the amount recommended by our directors. As a newly-incorporated company, we do not expect to have distributable profits from which dividends may be declared. For further information on the dividend restrictions applicable to us as a Singaporean company, see Description of Share CapitalMemorandum and Articles of AssociationDividends, and Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our Ordinary Shares and this OfferingAs a newly-incorporated company, we will not have distributable profits to pay dividends . For further information on certain tax considerations affecting dividend payments, see Taxation .
60
The following table has been derived from ICPs financial statements and sets forth our capitalization as of June 30, 2015 on an actual basis and as adjusted to give effect to (1) the Reorganization, (2) the completion of this offering, assuming an initial public offering price of $ per ordinary share, which is the midpoint of the estimated initial public offering price range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deducting estimated underwriting discounts and estimated offering expenses payable by us and (3) the prepayment in full of all obligations under our note payable to Kenon (which will be in an aggregate principal amount of $220 million) and which will be issued to Kenon in connection with the Reorganization, assuming no exercise of the underwriters option to purchase additional ordinary shares from us. IC Power is nominally capitalized, has no material assets or liabilities and, other than with respect to the adjustments set out below, IC Powers total capitalization after the Reorganization and this offering will not differ from its predecessor ICPs.
You should read this table together with the information in Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Information, Selected Consolidated Financial and Other Data, Use of Proceeds, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and our financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus.
As of
|
Reorganization |
Completion
|
Repayment
|
As
|
||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 436 | | | $ | |||||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Debt, of which: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term |
||||||||||||||||||||
Secured |
1,966 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Unsecured |
494 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Short-term |
||||||||||||||||||||
Secured |
5 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Unsecured |
49 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Note payable to Kenon |
| 220 | | (220 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Total |
2,078 | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
1,642 | $ | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital attributable to our equity holders |
852 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
210 | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total equity |
1,062 | | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 3,140 | | | $ | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A $1.00 change in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per ordinary share would, in the case of an increase, increase the total capital attributed to our equity holders, total equity and total capitalization by $ and, in the case of a decrease, decrease the total capital attributed to our equity holders, total equity and total capitalization by $ , in each case, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses.
61
If you invest in the ordinary shares, your interest will be diluted to the extent of the difference between the initial public offering price per ordinary share and our net tangible book value per ordinary share after this offering. Dilution results from the fact that the initial public offering price per ordinary share is substantially in excess of the net tangible book value per ordinary share. Our net tangible book value as of , giving pro forma effect to the Reorganization, was $ million or $ per ordinary share. Net tangible book value per ordinary share represents the amount of total assets, excluding intangible assets and goodwill, minus the amount of total liabilities, divided by the total number of ordinary shares outstanding at the end of the period.
Without taking into account any other changes in such net tangible book value after , other than to give effect to the Reorganization and our issuance and sale of ordinary shares in this offering, based upon an assumed initial public offering price of $ per ordinary share, which is the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover page of this prospectus, and after deduction of underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, our pro forma net tangible book value as of would have been $ per outstanding ordinary share, or $ per ordinary share. This represents an immediate increase in net tangible book value of $ or % per ordinary share to our existing shareholders and an immediate dilution in net tangible book value of $ or % per ordinary share, or $ or % per ordinary share, to new investors of ordinary shares in this offering. Dilution is determined by subtracting net tangible book value per ordinary share immediately upon the completion of this offering from the assumed initial public offering price per ordinary share.
The following table illustrates such dilution, assuming no exercise of the underwriters option to purchase additional ordinary shares:
Assumed initial public offering price per ordinary share |
||
Pro forma net tangible book value per ordinary share as of |
||
Amount of dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per ordinary share immediately after this offering |
||
Amount of dilution in pro forma net tangible book value per ordinary share to new investors in the offering |
A $1.00 change in the assumed initial public offering price of $ per ordinary share would, in the case of an increase, increase the dilution per ordinary share to new investors in this offering by $ per ordinary share and, in the case of a decrease, decrease the dilution per ordinary share to new investors in this offering by $ per ordinary share, in each case, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses. The pro forma information discussed above is illustrative only. Our net tangible book value following the completion of this offering is subject to adjustment based on the actual initial public offering price of our ordinary shares.
62
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The following tables present our selected consolidated financial and operating data. The selected consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 and for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 have been derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements, and the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this prospectus, in each case including all adjustments that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations for these periods. The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, included elsewhere in this prospectus, and the consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 have been derived from our consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, which are not included in this prospectus. Our historical results for any prior period are not necessarily indicative of results expected in any future period. Additionally, the selected consolidated interim financial and operating information as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 or for any period subsequent to June 30, 2015.
You should read the selected consolidated financial and operating data set forth below in conjunction with the sections entitled Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Information, Use of Proceeds, Capitalization, and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, as well as in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements, and notes thereto, included elsewhere in this prospectus. Except as otherwise indicated, or unless the context requires otherwise, references to the Company, we, us and our in this section shall refer to ICP and its businesses.
The following table presents our selected consolidated statement of income data for the periods presented:
Six Months Ended
|
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 1 |
2014 1 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Consolidated Statements of Income |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations Data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 655 | $ | 661 | $ | 1,372 | $ | 873 | $ | 576 | $ | 526 | $ | 305 | ||||||||||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
(458 | ) | (468 | ) | (936 | ) | (594 | ) | (396 | ) | (377 | ) | (218 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(54 | ) | (48 | ) | (101 | ) | (72 | ) | (51 | ) | (38 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
143 | 145 | 335 | 207 | 129 | 111 | 61 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(31 | ) | (30 | ) | (68 | ) | (41 | ) | (37 | ) | (32 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Asset write-off |
| | (35 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| 48 | 68 | 1 | | 24 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
| 3 | 3 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (12 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income |
2 | 3 | 17 | 5 | 7 | | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating income |
113 | 168 | 308 | 172 | 99 | 103 | 54 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
53 | 67 | 119 | 80 | 44 | 36 | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
60 | 103 | 191 | 94 | 57 | 69 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(21 | ) | (31 | ) | (51 | ) | (41 | ) | (20 | ) | (16 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
39 | 72 | 140 | 53 | 37 | 53 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations 3 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
4 | 7 | 128 | 28 | 29 | 20 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
$ | 43 | $ | 79 | $ | 268 | $ | 81 | $ | 66 | $ | 73 | $ | 36 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
Six Months Ended
|
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 1 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity holders of the Company |
33 | 66 | 236 | 66 | 57 | 60 | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
10 | 13 | 32 | 15 | 9 | 13 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average number of shares (in millions of shares) |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per share |
3.3 | 6.6 | 23.6 | 6.6 | 5.7 | 6.0 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends per share |
| 3.7 | 3.7 | | | | |
1. | Restated and reclassified. See Note 3 to our unaudited financial statements included in this prospectus. |
2. | ICP was incorporated in January 2010. Financial data for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the consolidated results of Inkia and OPC from April 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively, the time of their transfer to ICP. |
3. | Reflects dividends received from Edegel post-equity method accounting and the results of Acter Holdings, which primarily consists of our proportionate share of Edegels results for the period. |
The following table presents our selected consolidated statement of financial position data as of the dates presented:
As of
|
As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 1 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Consolidated Statement of Financial Position Data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 436 | $ | 583 | $ | 517 | $ | 184 | $ | 221 | $ | 114 | ||||||||||||
Short-term deposits and restricted cash |
185 | 208 | 9 | 81 | 171 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
174 | 181 | 138 | 96 | 75 | 77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
947 | 1,089 | 724 | 416 | 536 | 266 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments in associated companies |
9 | 10 | 286 | 312 | 283 | 268 | ||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
2,842 | 2,515 | 1,875 | 1,583 | 1,247 | 681 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
4,063 | 3,859 | 3,036 | 2,457 | 2,169 | 1,301 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short-term credit from banks and others |
158 | 162 | 244 | 80 | 81 | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
147 | 144 | 92 | 42 | 57 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
454 | 452 | 451 | 172 | 217 | 110 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-term loans from banks and others |
1,676 | 1,499 | 788 | 670 | 487 | 186 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans and capital notes from parent |
| | 242 | 237 | 219 | 207 | ||||||||||||||||||
Debentures |
680 | 687 | 637 | 516 | 525 | 185 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
3,002 | 2,828 | 2,237 | 1,709 | 1,546 | 761 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share capital and premium |
431 | 431 | 431 | 431 | 431 | 431 | ||||||||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
433 | 403 | 204 | 137 | 80 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total equity attributable to the equity holders of the Company |
852 | 815 | 653 | 619 | 550 | 473 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
210 | 216 | 146 | 129 | 72 | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total equity |
1,062 | 1,031 | 799 | 748 | 622 | 540 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 4,063 | $ | 3,859 | $ | 3,036 | $ | 2,457 | $ | 2,169 | $ | 1,301 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Restated and reclassified. See Note 3 to our audited financial statements included in this prospectus. |
64
The following table presents our selected consolidated cash flow information for the periods presented:
Six Months
|
For the Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 1 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selected Consolidated Cash Flow Data |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 131 | $ | 177 | $ | 413 | $ | 272 | $ | 122 | $ | 127 | $ | 65 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(341 | ) | (267 | ) | (378 | ) | (258 | ) | (293 | ) | (643 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(63 | ) | 90 | 47 | 320 | 132 | 623 | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(147 | ) | (180 | ) | 82 | 334 | (39 | ) | 107 | 114 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
583 | 517 | 517 | 184 | 221 | 114 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of changes in the exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents |
| 2 | (16 | ) | (1 | ) | 2 | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
$ | 436 | $ | 339 | $ | 583 | $ | 517 | $ | 184 | $ | 221 | $ | 114 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Restated and reclassified. See Note 3 to our unaudited financial statements included in this prospectus. |
2. | ICP was incorporated in January 2010. Cash flow information for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the consolidated results of Inkia and OPC from April 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively, the time of their transfer to ICP. |
Key Financial and Other Operating Information
The following tables set forth certain key financial and operating data for the periods presented:
Six
|
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 1 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 2 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
39 | 72 | 140 | 53 | 37 | 53 | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
43 | 79 | 268 | 81 | 66 | 73 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA 3 |
175 | 168 | 395 | 247 | 154 | 120 | 82 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net debt 4 |
1,893 | 1,629 | 1,557 | 1,143 | 1,001 | 701 | 285 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Installed capacity of operating companies and associated companies at end of year (MW) |
2,642 | 2,463 | 2,642 | 2,070 | 1,572 | 1,280 | 1,127 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Proportionate capacity of operating companies and associated companies at end of period (MW) |
2,149 | 1,929 | 2,108 | 1,608 | 1,198 | 979 | 846 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average availability during the period (%) |
94 | % | 97 | % | 94 | % | 94 | % | 93 | % | 91 | % | 94 | % | ||||||||||||||
Gross energy generated (GWh) |
6,020 | 6,714 | 13,156 | 8,820 | 6,339 | 6,011 | 5,135 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Energy sold under PPAs (GWh) |
6,883 | 7,377 | 14,220 | 9,217 | 5,365 | 5,212 | 4,626 |
1. | Restated and reclassified. See Note 3 to our unaudited financial statements included in this prospectus. |
2. | ICP was incorporated in January 2010. Financial data for the year ended December 31, 2010 reflects the consolidated results of Inkia and OPC from April 1, 2010 and June 30, 2010, respectively, the time of their transfer to ICP. |
3. | Adjusted EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure. For a reconciliation of our net income to our Adjusted EBITDA, see Summary Consolidated Financial and Other InformationKey Financial and Other Operating Information . |
4. | Net Debt is a non-IFRS measure. For a reconciliation of our total debt to our net debt, see Summary Consolidated Financial and Other InformationKey Financial and Other Operating Information . |
65
Information by Segment
Set forth below is a summary of the key financial metrics of each of our segments for the periods set forth below:
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Total | Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
225 | 157 | 175 | 98 | 655 | 225 | 202 | 136 | 99 | 661 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(139 | ) | (112 | ) | (140 | ) | (67 | ) | (459 | ) | (145 | ) | (141 | ) | (113 | ) | (69 | ) | (468 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
53 | 31 | 19 | 5 | 113 | 53 | 44 | 12 | 54 | 168 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating margins |
24 | % | 20 | % | 11 | % | 9 | % | 17 | % | 24 | % | 22 | % | 9 | % | 55 | % | 25 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(20 | ) | (13 | ) | (5 | ) | (15 | ) | 53 | (17 | ) | (15 | ) | (3 | ) | (32 | ) | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) for the period |
22 | 13 | 11 | (7 | ) | 43 | 24 | 21 | 7 | 23 | 79 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Installed capacity of operating companies and associated companies at end of period (MW) |
1,063 | 440 | 504 | 635 |
|
2,642 |
|
1,063 | 440 | 325 | 635 | 2,463 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportionate capacity of operating companies at end of period (MW) |
797 | 352 | 436 | 564 | 2,149 | 797 | 352 | 216 | 564 | 1,929 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross energy generated (GWh) |
1,928 | 1,937 | 1,123 | 1,032 |
|
6,020 |
|
2,931 | 1,867 | 1,012 | 904 |
|
6,714 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy sold under PPAs (GWh) |
3,191 | 1,965 | 1,235 | 492 |
|
6,883 |
|
3,361 | 1,962 | 1,404 | 650 |
|
7,377 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Total | Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
437 | 413 | 308 | 214 | 1,372 | 394 | 187 | 147 | 145 | 873 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(270 | ) | (252 | ) | (260 | ) | (154 | ) | (936 | ) | (239 | ) | (139 | ) | (127 | ) | (89 | ) | (594 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
108 | 127 | 21 | 43 | 308 | 101 | 31 | 7 | 23 | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating margins |
25 | % | 31 | % | 7 | % | 20 | % | 22 | % | 26 | % | 17 | % | 5 | % | 16 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
34 | 30 | 8 | 46 | 119 | 34 | 22 | | 23 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
57 | 71 | 9 | 124 | 268 | 42 | 7 | 5 | 20 | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Installed capacity of operating companies and associated companies at end of period (MW) |
1,063 | 440 | 504 | 635 | 2,642 | 870 | 440 | 140 | 620 | 2,070 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proportionate capacity of operating companies at end of period (MW) |
797 | 352 | 395 | 564 | 2,108 | 652 | 352 | 99 | 505 | 1,608 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross energy generated (GWh) |
5,920 | 3,465 | 1,965 | 1,806 | 13,156 | 5,459 | 1,357 | 458 | 1,546 | 8,820 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy sold under PPAs (GWh) |
6,324 | 3,973 | 2,694 | 1,229 | 14,220 | 6,268 | 1,813 | 535 | 601 | 9,217 |
66
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
276 | | 155 | 145 | 576 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(177 | ) | | (132 | ) | (87 | ) | (396 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
59 | (4 | ) | 11 | 24 | 99 | ||||||||||||||
Operating margins |
21 | % | | 7 | % | 17 | % | 17 | % | |||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
18 | 4 | | 24 | 44 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) for the period |
32 | (6 | ) | 7 | 24 | 66 | ||||||||||||||
Installed capacity of operating companies and associated companies at end of period (MW) |
870 | | 140 | 562 | 1,572 | |||||||||||||||
Proportionate capacity of operating companies at end of period (MW) |
|
652
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
447
|
|
1,198 | |||||||||
Gross energy generated (GWh) |
4,282 | | 561 | 1,496 | 6,339 | |||||||||||||||
Energy sold under PPAs (GWh) |
4,321 | | 448 | 596 | 5,365 |
67
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This information should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements, and the notes thereto, as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 and for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, and our audited consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, included elsewhere in this prospectus. Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. The financial information below also includes certain non-IFRS measures, which are defined under Summary Consolidated Financial and Other Information and Business and are used by us to evaluate our economic and financial performance. These measures are not identified as accounting measures under IFRS and therefore should not be considered as an alternative measure to evaluate our performance.
Certain information included in this discussion and analysis includes forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties, and which may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. For further information on important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results described in the forward-looking statements contained in this discussion and analysis, see Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Risk Factors.
Except as otherwise indicated, or unless the context requires otherwise, references to the Company, we, us and our prior to the date hereof shall refer to ICP and its businesses, and as of the date hereof and thereafter, to IC Power and its subsidiaries, which subsidiaries shall include ICP as if the Reorganization had been consummated on the date hereof.
We are a leading owner, developer and operator of power facilities located in key power generation markets in Latin America, the Caribbean and Israel, utilizing a range of fuels, including natural gas, hydroelectric, HFO, diesel and wind. Currently, our principal focus is on Latin American markets, which typically have higher rates of growth of GDP and lower overall and per capita energy consumption, as compared with more developed markets. We believe that economic growth in Latin American markets will drive increases in overall and per capita energy consumption and therefore require significant additional investments in power generation assets in those markets.
As of June 30, 2015, our installed capacity and our proportionate capacity were 2,642 MW and 2,149 MW, respectively. We expect to increase our installed capacity by 1,202 MW, or 45%, to 3,844 MW (3,074 MW on a proportionate basis) by the middle of 2016, upon the completion of the following assets in advanced stages of construction:
| Cerro del Aguila S.A.s, or CDAs, 510 MW hydroelectric project located in Peru, which we expect to be completed by the middle of 2016; |
| Samay I S.A.s, or Samay Is, 600 MW cold-reserve thermoelectric project located in Peru, which we expect to be completed by the middle of 2016; and |
| Kanan Overseas, I. Inc.s, or Kanans, 92 MW thermal generation project in Panama, which we expect to be completed by the end of 2015. |
Between 2007 and June 30, 2015, we invested approximately $2.5 billion in the acquisition, development and expansion of our power generation assets. Of this amount, 87% represented investments in greenfield development (including investments made in those assets in advanced stages of construction) and 13% represented acquisitions. We have financed our greenfield development using a combination of cash on hand, debt financing and investments by minority shareholders at the asset level, and have financed our
68
acquisitions using cash on hand. Of the 2,093 MW we have added to our installed capacity since Inkias formation, 63% derived from greenfield development projects, consisting of our construction of the Kallpa combined cycle plant, which comprises Perus largest power generation facility, and the construction of OPCs plant, which became Israels first IPP. In the same period, we have acquired businesses with an aggregate installed capacity of 783 MW in five countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. By the middle of 2016, we will have derived 76% of our installed capacity growth since 2007 from our greenfield development efforts (based upon our current portfolio and assuming the completion of our assets in advanced stages of construction).
By successfully pursuing growth opportunities, primarily through contracted greenfield development projects in existing markets and acquisitions of anchor investments in new markets, we have expanded our regional presence, diversified our portfolio through the addition of various facilities which use a range of fuels, and significantly increased our cash flows. In 2014, our Adjusted EBITDA was $395 million, as compared to $41 million in 2008, representing a CAGR of 46% during this period. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure. For a reconciliation of our net income to our Adjusted EBITDA, see Summary Consolidated Financial and Other InformationKey Financial and Other Operating Information .
Overview of Financial Information Presented and Accounting Policies
Operating Segments and Presentation of Segment Financial Data
As a holding company, our results of operations are impacted by the financial results of each of our businesses. Set forth below is a summary of our segmentation for each of our operating assets and material intermediate holding companies:
Entity |
Country |
Segment |
||
Kallpa |
Peru | Peru 1 | ||
OPC |
Israel | Israel | ||
Corinto |
Nicaragua | Central America 2 | ||
Tipitapa Power |
Nicaragua | |||
Amayo I |
Nicaragua | |||
Amayo II |
Nicaragua | |||
Puerto Quetzal |
Guatemala | |||
Nejapa |
El Salvador | |||
Cenérgica |
El Salvador | |||
COBEE |
Bolivia | Other | ||
Central Cardones |
Chile | |||
Colmito |
Chile | |||
CEPP |
Dominican Republic | |||
JPPC |
Jamaica | |||
Surpetroil |
Colombia | |||
Pedregal 3 |
Panama | |||
Inkia & Other |
| |||
ICP & Other |
|
1. | The Peru segment will also include the operating results of CDA and Samay I upon their COD. |
2. | The Central America segment will also include the operating results of Kanan upon its COD. |
3. | Although Pedregal is located in Central America, our interest in Pedregal is a minority interest. Therefore, from an income statement perspective, Pedregal is not part of the Central America segment and is reflected in our Other segment in our share in income of associated companies. |
We have included the results of operations of each of our segments under Operating Results below.
69
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates
In preparing our financial statements, we make judgments, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our estimates and associated assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis and are based upon historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe that the estimates, assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies described below have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements. For further detail of the accounting policies and the methods used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, see Notes 2 and 3 of our audited consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014.
Impairment Analysis
For each reporting period, we examine whether there have been any events or changes in circumstances which would indicate an impairment of one or more non-monetary assets or cash generating units, or CGUs. When there are indications of an impairment, a review is made as to whether the carrying amount of the non-monetary assets or CGUs exceeds the recoverable amount and, if so, an impairment loss is recognized. An assessment of the impairment of the goodwill in a consolidated company is performed once a year or when triggering events exist.
Under IFRS, the recoverable amount of the asset or CGU is determined based upon the higher of (1) the fair value less costs of disposal, and (2) the present value of the future cash flows expected from the continued use of the asset or CGU in its present condition, including cash flows expected to be received upon the retirement of the asset from service and the eventual sale of the asset (value in use). The future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time-value of money and the risks specific to the asset or CGU.
The estimates regarding future cash flows are based upon past experience with respect to this asset or similar assets (or CGUs), and on our businesses best possible assessments regarding the economic conditions that will exist during the remaining useful life of the asset or CGU. Such estimates rely on the particular business current development plans and forecasts. As the actual cash flows may differ, the recoverable amount determined could change in subsequent periods, such that an additional impairment loss may need to be recognized or a previously recognized impairment loss may need to be reversed.
At the end of each reporting period, we assess whether there is any indication that any of the CGUs may be impaired and consider, among other things, whether there are indications of any of the following:
| Significant changes in the technological, economic or legal environment in which the CGUs operate, taking into account the country in which each CGU operates; |
| Increases in interest rates or other market rates of return, which are likely to affect the discount rates used in calculating each CGUs recoverable amount; |
| Evidence of obsolescence or physical damage of each CGUs assets; |
| Actual performance of each CGU that does not meet expected performance indicators ( e.g. , its budget); |
| Declines in tariffs agreed upon in PPAs and/or in current energy prices; |
70
| Increases in fuel and/or gas prices and other power generation costs; and |
| New laws and regulations, or changes in existing laws and regulations, that could have an adverse effect on the power generation industry. |
During 2014, one of Inkias subsidiaries updated its five-year budget as a result of a downward trend in its results combined with anticipated impacts of recent political changes in the country in which the subsidiary operates, which affects the power generation business therein, and expectations of an increase in operating costs and unchanged electricity prices, which will probably lead to a decrease in its profitability. As a result, Inkia considered a potential impairment in this subsidiary and conducted an impairment analysis using the value in use method and a discount rate of 7.6%. Accordingly, Inkia determined that the book value of the subsidiarys assets exceeded its recoverable amount and therefore recorded an impairment loss of $35 million in the year ended December 31, 2014.
As of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, each CGU was performing according to expectations, was profitable, and we concluded that none of the aforementioned indications were present, so as to suggest that any of our CGUs may have been impaired. Additionally, in connection with each of our acquisitions in 2014, 2013 and 2012, we conducted an assessment as to whether there is any indication that the asset may be impaired. As there were no such indications, we did not measure the recoverable amount of the CGUs as of such dates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to us and the revenue can be reliably measured, regardless of when the payment is made. Revenue comprises the fair value for the sale of capacity and energy, taking into account contractually defined terms of payment, net of value added tax, rebates and discounts, and after eliminating intra-group sales.
Assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met, revenues from the sale of capacity and energy are recognized in the period during which the sale occurs. Revenues from our power generation assets are earned and recorded when energy is delivered or capacity is provided at prices specified pursuant to our PPAs or, if the sales were made on the spot market, according to the marginal spot market price at the time of the sale. As a result, the application of our revenue recognition policy is not generally subject to significant estimates or assumptions. However, at the close of each accounting period, we may need to make estimations and assumptions with respect to the volume of energy delivered to our customers during any unbilled period near the end of the relevant accounting period. These estimates are based upon the volume of energy delivered in, and the consumer price index (used to adjust the monthly PPAs prices) of, the previous month. The differences between the estimated revenue recognized during such period and the actual revenues subsequently realized are recorded in the following accounting period. Historically, these differences have not been significant or material in nature. As revenues generated from our capacity sales are not consumption-based, the calculation of our revenues derived from capacity sales do not involve equivalent estimates or assumptions at the close of each accounting period.
Income Tax
Whenever necessary, we are required to make provisions based on the amount of taxes expected to be paid to the tax authorities. When the final taxable result differs from the amounts initially recognized in the provision as a consequence of estimates, such differences will affect both our income tax and the determination of our deferred tax assets and liabilities.
In addition, in order to determine our income tax provision, it is necessary to make estimates to the extent that we will have to evaluate, on an ongoing basis, the positions taken in tax returns in respect of those situations in which the applicable tax legislation is subject to interpretation. A significant degree of judgment is
71
required to determine our income tax provision, as there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. We recognize liabilities for eventual tax claims based on estimates of whether additional taxes will be due in the future. When the final tax outcome of these matters differs from the amounts initially recognized, such differences will have an impact on our current and deferred income tax assets and our liabilities in the period in which such determination is made.
Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are only recognized to the extent that they are probable and a sufficient taxable base will be available to allow for the total or partial recovery of these assets. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, we take account of the extent to which we believe that it is likely that a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our ultimate realization of deferred tax assets depends upon our generation of future taxable income in the periods in which these temporary differences become deductible. To make this assessment, we take into consideration the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, the projections of future taxable income and tax planning strategies.
Provisions for Contingent Liabilities
A provision for claims is recognized as a liability (assuming that a reliable estimate can be made) because it is a present obligation and it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligations. Provisions in general are highly judgmental, especially in cases of legal disputes. We assess the probability of an adverse event and, if the probability is evaluated to be more likely than not, we fully provide for the total amount of the estimated contingent liability. We continually evaluate our pending provisions to determine if accruals are required. It is often difficult to accurately estimate the ultimate outcome of a contingent liability. Different variables can affect the timing and amounts we provide for certain contingent liabilities. These assessments, therefore, are subject to estimates made by us and our legal counsel, and adverse revisions in these estimates of the potential liability could materially impact our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. For further information on our legal proceedings, see Business and, in particular, BusinessLegal ProceedingsKallpaImport Tax Assessments .
72
Material Factors Affecting Results of Operations
Capacity Growth 1
As set forth below, our capacity, excluding the capacity attributable to our assets in advanced stages of construction, was 2,642 MW as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, representing a 107% growth in capacity since January 1, 2012. Our proportionate capacity, excluding the capacity attributable to our assets in advanced stages of construction, was 2,149 MW and 2,108 MW as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
1. | As a result of our sale of our indirect interest in Edegel in September 2014, our capacity growth summary does not include Edegels 1,540 MW of installed capacity during the periods in which we held our indirect interest in Edegel. |
2. | Reflects 100% of the capacity of each of our assets, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
3. | Reflects the proportionate capacity of each of our assets, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
4. | In May 2014, we increased our equity ownership in JPPC from 16% to 100%. |
5. | In November 2014, Puerto Quetzal transferred a 55 MW power barge to Kanan, reducing Puerto Quetzals capacity from 234 MW to 179 MW. |
6. | In January 2015, we increased our equity ownership in Nejapa from 71% to 100%. |
As a result of our capacity expansion, our consolidated revenues, operating income, finance expenses and net income during the periods discussed in this section substantially increased. We expect to further increase our installed capacity by 45% to 3,844 MW (3,074 MW on a proportionate basis), upon the completion of our assets in advanced stages of construction: CDAs 510 MW hydroelectric project located in Peru (expected COD
73
by the middle of 2016), Samay Is 600 MW cold-reserve thermoelectric project located in Peru (expected COD by the middle of 2016) and Kanans 92 MW thermal generation project in Panama (expected COD by the end of 2015).
Macroeconomic Conditions in the Countries in Which we Operate
Macroeconomic conditions may impact the gross domestic production of the countries in which we operate which may, in turn, affect the consumption of electricity by industrial and individual consumers in those countries. For instance, countries experiencing sustained economic growth generally experience an increase in their consumption of electricity. Additionally, macroeconomic conditions are also likely to affect foreign exchange rates, domestic interest rates and inflation, which each has an effect on our financial and operating costs. Fluctuations in the exchange rates between local currencies in the countries in which we operate and the U.S. dollar, which is our functional currency, will generate either gains or losses on monetary assets and liabilities denominated in these local currencies and can therefore affect our profitability. Fluctuations in inflation rates may also increase labor costs and other local expenses of our operations, and we may be unable to pass such increases on to our customers ( e.g ., to customers who purchase energy or capacity from us pursuant to long-term PPAs, which are not linked to local inflation rates).
For further information on the risks associated with currency fluctuations, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Government RegulationForeign exchange rate fluctuations and controls could have a material adverse effect on our earnings and the strength of our balance sheet .
The following table sets forth the percentage growth in GDP, the currency appreciation / depreciation (relative to the U.S. Dollar), and the annual inflation rate for the periods presented for each of the countries in which we operate, according to segment:
The following table sets forth the average local currencies per dollar exchange rates and the annual inflation rate for the periods presented for each of the countries in which we have material operations:
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country |
Inflation
|
GDP
|
Currency
|
Inflation
|
GDP
|
Currency
|
Inflation
|
GDP
|
Currency
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru |
3.2 | 2.4 | (11 | ) | 2.8 | 5.8 | (4 | ) | 3.7 | 6.0 | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Israel |
(0.2 | ) | 2.6 | (12 | ) | 1.5 | 3.3 | 7 | 1.7 | 3.4 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Central America |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicaragua |
6.4 | 4.0 | (5 | ) | 5.7 | 4.6 | (4 | ) | 6.6 | 5.0 | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guatemala |
3.4 | 4.0 | 4 | 4.3 | 3.7 | (1 | ) | 3.8 | 3.0 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
El Salvador |
0.5 | 1.8 | | 0.8 | 1.7 | | 1.7 | 1.9 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panama |
2.1 | 6.2 | | 5.9 | 8.4 | | 7.2 | 10.8 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bolivia |
5.2 | 5.2 | | 5.7 | 6.8 | | 4.6 | 5.2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chile |
4.6 | 1.8 | (23 | ) | 1.8 | 4.3 | (2 | ) | 3.0 | 5.5 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dominican Republic |
3.0 | 7.3 | (6 | ) | 4.8 | 4.8 | (6 | ) | 3.7 | 3.9 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jamaica |
6.4 | (0.5 | ) | (10 | ) | 9.5 | 0.2 | (13 | ) | 8.0 | 0.5 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Colombia |
3.7 | 4.6 | (7 | ) | 1.9 | 4.9 | (4 | ) | 2.4 | 4.0 | 3 |
For further information on the macroeconomic conditions of the key countries in which we operate or in which we may operate in the future, see Industry .
74
Availability and Dispatch
The regulatory frameworks in each of the countries in which we currently operate, other than Israel and Jamaica, establish marginal cost systems, and the relevant regulatory agencies determine which generation units are to be dispatched, so as to minimize the cost of energy supplied.
The availability of a power generation asset refers to the percentage of time that a plant is available to generate energy. For example, even though they generally maintain the highest place in the dispatch merit order due to their efficiency and low generation costs, hydroelectric plants are unavailable when they are removed from operation to conserve water in the associated reservoirs or river basins or for maintenance, or when there are unscheduled outages. Thermal plants, which are lower in the dispatch merit order than hydroelectric plants, are unavailable for dispatch when they are removed from operation for maintenance or when there are unscheduled outages. Each of the relevant regulatory agencies considers the average availability of generation plants when it allocates firm capacity, which is the amount of capacity that, pursuant to applicable regulations, an energy sector regulator recognizes and remunerates to each power generation unit for being available to cover the demand in peak hours.
IEC, which is owned by the State of Israel and was the sole large-scale provider of energy in Israel prior to the commencement of OPCs operations in July 2013, is the system operator of Israels electricity system and determines the dispatch order of Israels generation units. Pursuant to OPCs PPA with IEC, which covers OPCs entire firm capacity, OPC has informed IEC of the exclusion of OPCs entire capacity, so as to sell such capacity directly to private customers. As a result, OPCs entire capacity has been allocated to private customers in Israel since July 2013.
The following table sets forth the weighted average availability of our generation plants in each of the countries in which we operate for the periods presented, according to segment:
Six Months
|
Year Ended
|
Year Ended
|
Year Ended
|
|||||||||||||
Peru |
94 | % | 97 | % | 94 | % | 92 | % | ||||||||
Israel |
99 | % | 90 | % | 96 | % 1 | | |||||||||
Central America |
||||||||||||||||
Nicaragua |
89 | % | 95 | % | | | ||||||||||
Guatemala |
93 | % | 97 | % | | | ||||||||||
El Salvador |
97 | % | 97 | % | 95 | % | 94 | % | ||||||||
Panama |
92 | % | 93 | % | 92 | % | 88 | % | ||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||
Bolivia |
88 | % | 91 | % | 96 | % | 96 | % | ||||||||
Chile |
96 | % | 96 | % | 96 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
Dominican Republic |
85 | % | 89 | % | 87 | % | 82 | % | ||||||||
Jamaica |
83 | % | 85 | % | 88 | % | 88 | % | ||||||||
Colombia |
96 | % | 84 | % | | |
1. | Reflects average availability of OPC since its COD in July 2013. |
A substantial portion of the capacity in each of the countries in which we currently operate, other than Israel, Nicaragua and Jamaica, is comprised of hydroelectric plants. The marginal cost of production by these plants is almost nil. As a result, these plants are generally the first to be dispatched, when available. However, the availability of these plants is subject to annual and seasonal variations based on the hydrology of the reservoirs and river basins that provide the water to operate these plants. For example, COBEEs hydroelectric plants are
75
among the first generation units to be dispatched in Bolivia as a result of the low variable costs associated with these units, and we expect that following its commissioning in 2016, CDAs plant will be among the first generation units dispatched in Peru. We seek to ensure that our hydroelectric units are available to be dispatched when necessary, as such availability is important to our ability to capture the benefits of marginal cost dispatch and the maximization of our margins.
When hydroelectric plants are unavailable or have been fully dispatched, other generation plants are generally dispatched on the basis of cost, with lower cost units, such as thermal gas plants, generally dispatched first. The Kallpa facility units, for example, are among the first generation units to be dispatched in Peru after the hydroelectric plants, since the Kallpa plants are among the lowest-cost thermal generation plants in Peru. Generally, the order in which regulatory agencies will dispatch plants which are neither hydroelectric or gas-powered are: (1) wind-powered; (2) coal-powered; (3) HFO-powered; followed by (4) diesel-powered. As many of the countries in which we operate are seeking to incentivize the production of wind and renewable energy plants, which typically have relatively low operating costs, these countries often dispatch wind-powered plants, such as Amayo I and Amayo II, on a priority basis. Similar to hydroelectric plants, however, the availability of wind-powered plants to be dispatched is limited by the availability of the resource ( i.e ., whether the wind is blowing).
If our generation plants are available for dispatch and are not dispatched, or are partially dispatched, by the relevant system operator and if our obligations to deliver energy under our PPAs exceed the energy dispatched from our own generation units at any particular time, we purchase energy in the spot market to satisfy these obligations, and there is a risk that the price of such energy may be higher than the price for energy that we receive under our PPAs.
Similarly, if our generation plants are not allocated sufficient firm capacity to satisfy our obligations under our PPAs, we purchase capacity in the spot market to satisfy these obligations, and there is a risk that the price of such capacity may be higher than the price for capacity that we receive under our PPAs.
76
The following table sets forth the amount of energy sold under our PPAs and in the spot market, and the amount of energy generated and purchased during the years presented by each of the operating companies we owned as of June 30, 2015, according to segment 1 :
Segment |
Period |
Sales under
|
Sales in
|
Net
|
Energy
|
|||||||||||||
(GWh) |
||||||||||||||||||
Peru |
Kallpa: | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 6,324 | 235 | 5,698 | 861 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 6,268 | 84 | 5,265 | 1,087 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | 4,321 | 162 | 4,133 | 350 | ||||||||||||||
Israel |
OPC: | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 3,973 | | 3,400 | 573 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 1,813 | | 1,331 | 482 | ||||||||||||||
(since July 2013) | ||||||||||||||||||
Central America |
ICPNH: | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 1,063 | 22 | 1,058 | 27 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 1,045 | 44 | 1,042 | 47 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | 1,123 | 20 | 1,119 | 24 | ||||||||||||||
Puerto Quetzal: | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 1,005 | 53 | 465 | 593 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 1,304 | 24 | 489 | 840 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | 1,369 | 82 | 547 | 904 | ||||||||||||||
Nejapa: | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 626 | 93 | 373 | 346 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 535 | 171 | 457 | 249 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | 448 | 244 | 559 | 133 | ||||||||||||||
Other |
COBEE: | |||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 268 | 762 | 1,030 | | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 276 | 827 | 1,103 | | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | 277 | 826 | 1,103 | | ||||||||||||||
Central Cardones: | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | | | | | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | | | | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | 3 | 1 | | 4 | ||||||||||||||
Colmito: | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 250 | | 5 | 245 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | | 46 | 45 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | | | | | ||||||||||||||
CEPP: | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 253 | 54 | 236 | 71 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 325 | 53 | 332 | 46 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | 316 | 14 | 330 | | ||||||||||||||
JPPC: | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 410 | | 410 | | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 432 | | 432 | | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | 422 | | 422 | | ||||||||||||||
Surpetroil: | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 45 | | 23 | | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 45 | | 22 | | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | 45 | | 22 | | ||||||||||||||
Pedregal : | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2014 | 269 | 136 | 391 | 14 | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2013 | 200 | 205 | 405 | | ||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2012 | 120 | 251 | 371 | |
1. | The information included within the table reflects 100% of the energy sold under PPAs, sold in the spot market, generated, and purchased by our assets, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset, and also contains information for certain of our assets from periods prior to our acquisition of such asset. For further information on our acquisition of assets during the periods within the table, see Capacity Growth . |
2. | Net energy generated is defined as energy delivered at the interconnection to the system. |
77
Cost of Sales
Our principal costs of sales are natural gas, HFO, lubricants, purchases of capacity and energy on the spot market, transmission costs, personnel, third party services and maintenance costs.
Our costs for natural gas, which include transportation costs, vary primarily based on the quantity of natural gas consumed, the variation of market prices of HFO, to which our natural gas prices are indexed, and whether we consume all of the natural gas that we are obligated to purchase under our natural gas supply contracts. Kallpas long-term gas supply contract with the Camisea Consortium, which is also used to supply gas to Las Flores, hedges Kallpa against fluctuations in the price of natural gas, however, Kallpas agreement with the Camisea Consortium will expire in June 2022, unless renewed by the parties. Once expired, Kallpa and Las Flores may be required to purchase their natural gas on spot markets at prices that may be greater than the prices they previously paid for such commodities and could therefore face increased volatility in their earnings and cash flows.
The price at which OPC purchases its natural gas from its sole natural gas supplier, the Tamar Group, is predominantly indexed (in excess of 70%) to changes in the PUAEs generation component tariff, pursuant to the price formula set forth in OPCs supply agreement with the Tamar Group. As a result, increases or decreases in this tariff have a related effect on OPCs cost of sales and margins. Additionally, the natural gas price formula in OPCs supply agreement is subject to a floor mechanism. PUAE generation component tariffs are lower in 2015 as compared to 2012-2014. Additionally, on September 8, 2015, the PUAE published a final decision, which became effective on September 13, 2015, and which further reduced the PUAE generation component tariff by approximately 12% from NIS 300.9 per MWh and NIS 301.5 per MWh to a single tariff of NIS 265.2 per MWh. As a result of previous declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, OPC will begin to pay the ultimate floor price in November 2015. Therefore, the recent September 2015 decline and any further declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, will not result in a corresponding decline in OPCs natural gas expenses, and will lead to a greater decline in OPCs margins.
Our costs for HFO, which include transportation costs, vary primarily based on the quantity of HFO consumed and the variation of market prices of HFO. For example, we generate electricity using HFO in each of the countries comprising our Central America segment, as well as in the Dominican Republic. The price adjustment mechanisms in our PPAs in these countries generally limit our exposure to the price of HFO.
As fuel is a significant cost for most of our operating companies, the price of various fuels ( e.g. , gas, diesel, or HFO) has a significant effect on our costs. However, as prices in the spot market tend to reflect current fuel prices and, as the majority of our PPAs contain a fuel price adjustment mechanism to reflect increases or decreases in the price of fuel, changes in fuel prices generally result in corresponding changes in revenues as a result of these pass-through mechanisms and do not substantially affect our operating margins. Accordingly, while the decline in global oil prices, which occurred during 2014, has resulted, in part, in a decline in our revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2015, such decline in global oil prices has not had and is not expected to have a commensurate effect on our operating margins or Adjusted EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2015. In some cases, however, our PPAs fuel price adjustment mechanisms may not adjust to reflect the full increase or decrease in fuel prices, or may reflect such adjustments on a lagging basis as a result of the indexation mechanisms of our PPAs (which update only periodically and have minimum thresholds) and the indexations of our long-term supply agreements.
Our costs for transmission vary primarily according to the quantity of energy that we sell and the locations of the specific nodes to which our plants are connected in the national interconnected electrical systems of the various countries in which we operate. Under our PPAs and the regulatory regimes under which we sell energy in the spot market, most transmission costs are passed on to our customers.
78
We incur personnel and third party services costs in the operation of our plants. These costs are usually independent of the volumes of energy produced by our plants. We incur maintenance costs in connection with the ongoing and periodic maintenance of our generation plants. These costs are usually correlated to the volumes of energy produced and the number of running hours of our plants.
Results from Associated Company
Our net income, cash flows from operations and statement of financial condition are affected by the results of Pedregal, in which we hold a 21% indirect equity interest.
We record our proportional share in the net income of Pedregal, currently our only associated company, in our statement of income as share in profit in associates. Our share in profit in associated companies was $116 thousand, $2 million, $2 million and $2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We record dividends received from Pedregal as cash flow from operations in our statement of cash flows. During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we received dividends from Pedregal in the aggregate amount of $1 million, $2 million, $5 million and $467 thousand, respectively. The book value that we record for Pedregal in our statement of financial position is adjusted to reflect our proportional share in the net income of Pedregal and the dividends received from Pedregal, which is adjusted to reflect the cumulative translation adjustment to the value of our investment.
Although we are party to a management services agreement, which designates us as the administrator responsible for the day-to-day management of Pedregal, and may therefore exert a degree of influence with respect to Pedregals management and operation, we have a non-controlling interest in Pedregal. As a result, our ability to control the development and operation of Pedregal is limited and we may be dependent on Pedregals majority shareholders to approve certain operations. The approval of Pedregals majority shareholder is also required for distributions of funds to us.
Effects of Outstanding Indebtedness, including Financial Leases
Our total outstanding consolidated indebtedness was $2,514 million and $2,348 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and we had no outstanding loans and notes owed to Kenon as of such dates.
We financed our acquisition of the Kallpa I, II and III turbines and the Las Flores power plant through financial leases. As a result, we have recognized these turbines and power plant as property, plant and equipment and have recognized the related lease obligations as loans from banks and others, but do not recognize any cash flow from financing activities upon our entry into these financing agreements. Payments under these leases are recognized in our statement of cash flows as cash flows from financing activities at the time that these payments are made.
Additionally, we are committed to expanding our operations by developing greenfield assets in accordance with three fundamental principles, one of which includes securing long term project financing agreements to finance our development efforts. These financing agreements are generally stand alone, secured, project-specific, and with no or limited recourse. We expect that our commitment to our operational expansion will result in the incurrence of additional indebtedness, which may, in turn, result in an increase in our outstanding consolidated indebtedness.
Furthermore, as we continue to develop our assets by (1) drawing down on our existing credit facilities with third parties or (2) securing additional third party financing, as discussed above, to fund our capital expenditures with respect to new assets or projects, we may experience an increase in interest costs. Many of our debt agreements have floating interest rates ( e.g. , many of the debt instruments bear interest rates based on LIBOR) and, notwithstanding any interest rate swaps which we have entered, or may enter, into to address this
79
risk, a continued increase in interest rates could increase our interest expenses and the cost of the capital required to continue to fund our development and expansion efforts. Other than with respect to OPCs, ICPIs, Surpetroils, and certain of COBEEs indebtedness, which represented an aggregate of $545 million and $537 million of our outstanding indebtedness as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, our outstanding indebtedness is either denominated in, indexed to, or are the subject of interest rate swaps tied to, the U.S. Dollar. For further information on our outstanding indebtedness, including the interest rate and currency applicable to the indebtedness, see Material Indebtedness .
Negative Goodwill
Our development strategy contemplates the acquisition of energy assets in attractive markets, from time to time, in connection with our capacity expansion efforts. Based upon the difference between the amount paid, which we record in connection with our acquisition of such assets, and the net asset fair value, we may recognize negative goodwill at the purchase date.
For the six months ended June 30, 2015, we did not record any negative goodwill. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded one-time gains on bargain purchases of $24 million, $24 million and $20 million in connection with our acquisitions of ICPNH in March 2014, JPPC in May 2014 and Puerto Quetzal in September 2014, respectively.
Income Taxes
We operate through various subsidiaries in several countries and, as a result, are subject to income tax in various jurisdictions. The following table sets forth the corporate income tax rates applicable as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 in each of the countries in which we operate:
2014 |
Year Ended
|
2012 |
||||||||||
(%) | ||||||||||||
Peru 1 |
30 | % | 30 | % | 30 | % | ||||||
Israel |
26.5 | % | 25 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
Central America |
||||||||||||
Nicaragua 2 |
25 | % | 25 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
Guatemala 3 |
28 | % | 31 | % | 31 | % | ||||||
El Salvador |
30 | % | 30 | % | 30 | % | ||||||
Panama |
25 | % | 25 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
Other |
||||||||||||
Bolivia |
25 | % | 25 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
Chile 4 |
21 | % | 20 | % | 18.5 | % | ||||||
Dominican Republic 5 |
28 | % | 29 | % | 29 | % | ||||||
Jamaica 6 |
33.3 | % | 33.3 | % | 33.3 | % | ||||||
Colombia 7 |
34 | % | 34 | % | 33 | % |
1. | The corporate income tax rate decreased to 28% in 2015 and is scheduled to decrease to 27% in 2017 and 2018 and 26% in 2019. The dividend tax rate has increased to 6.8% in 2015 and is scheduled to increase to 8% in 2017 and 9.3% in 2019. Distributions of profits for 2014 are subject to a tax rate of 4.1%. Kallpa, CDA and Samay I have signed legal stability agreements with the relevant tax authority in Peru pursuant to which, during the term of the corresponding agreement, Kallpa, CDA and Samay I, respectively, will be subject to the income tax regime in place at the time each such agreement was entered into, which stipulates a 30% income tax rate, and not the general income tax regime applicable to other firms in Peru. These stability agreements expire in 2020, 2022 and 2024, respectively. Only after these tax agreements expire, or if Kallpa, CDA and Samay I terminate the corresponding agreement, will they be subject to the general income tax regime of Peru and receive the benefit of the changes in the Peruvian income tax rates described above. |
2. |
The statutory rate in Nicaragua in 2012-2014 is 30%. However, Empresa Energética Corinto Ltd, or Corinto, and Tipitapa Power Company Ltd, or Tipitapa Power, are subject to 25% income tax, based on a Foreign Investment Agreement signed in June 2000, which |
80
protects them from any unfavorable changes in the tax law. In addition, Amayo I and Amayo II are tax exempt from income tax payments, in accordance with Law No.532 for Electric Power Generation with Renewable Sources Incentive, up to a period of seven years since their CODs. |
3. | The corporate income tax rate decreased to 25% in 2015. |
4. | The corporate income tax rate increased to 22.5% in 2015 and is scheduled to increase to 24% in 2016 and 25% in 2017 for shareholders on the attribution method or 22.5% in 2017 for shareholders on the cash-basis method. The corporate income tax rate is scheduled to increase to 27% in 2018 for shareholders on the cash-basis method. |
5. | The corporate income tax rate decreased to 27% in 2015. |
6. | 33.3% is the rate applied to regulated companies in Jamaica, including the companies regulated by Office of Utilities Regulation. |
7. | The aggregate income tax rate of 34% in Colombia is composed of a base corporate income tax rate of 25% plus the income tax for equality, or CREE, tax at a rate of 9%. Beginning in 2015, a surcharge to the CREE tax rate of 5% on income in excess of 800 million Colombian pesos (approximately $272 million) would effectively increase the aggregate income tax rate to approximately 39%. The surcharge on the CREE tax is expected to increase to 6% in 2016, 8% in 2017 and 9% in 2018, effectively increasing the aggregate income tax rate to approximately 40%, 42% and 43% in 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively, before being eliminated. |
For further information on the tax rates, including withholding tax rates, applicable to our operating companies, see Note 25 to our audited financial statements included in this prospectus.
Effects of Discontinued Operations
In September 2014, we completed the sale of our indirect equity interest in Edegel for $413 million (which resulted in our recognition of $110 million of net profit). As a result, the results of operations of Generandes (the entity through which we held our indirect equity interest in Edegel) are reflected as discontinued operations in our financial statements presented in this prospectus.
As a result of Generandes significance to our results of operations for certain periods prior to our disposition of Generandes, we have included Generandes consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 in this prospectus in accordance with Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X. Additional detail on Generandes historic financial performance can be found in these separate financial statements.
Factors Affecting Comparability of Operating and Financial Results
Our operational and financial results for the year ended December 31, 2014 have been affected by our acquisitions of various operating businesses, which must be understood in order to assess the comparability of our operating and financial results in the period to period financial analysis set forth below.
During the year ended December 31, 2014, excluding Las Flores (whose results of operations are consolidated with Kallpas) we successfully completed the acquisition of six generation assets, including the consolidation of JPPC, which collectively provided us with 439 MW in four countries in Latin America and the Caribbean, as set forth in Capacity Growth and an additional 2,037 GWh of power generated in the year ended December 31, 2014. Although our financial results reflect the results of each of our acquired assets for the periods subsequent to our acquisition of such assets, our year-end generation figures reflected throughout this prospectus reflect 100% of the generation figures of our consolidated companies at year-end, and therefore includes the full-year generation figures of our acquired companies, regardless of our date of acquisition of such companies. As a result, our increase in GWh for the year ended December 31, 2014 reflects the contribution of our acquired companies, and also includes certain amounts generated by these companies prior to our acquisition of these companies. However, as our financial results for the year ended December 31, 2014, such as our sales and cost of sales, reflect the financial results of these acquisitions from the date of consolidation, our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2014 may not be comparable to the financial results for the period to the extent of businesses acquired in the period.
As we seek to invest in additional assets through the acquisition of controlling interests in new operating assets, these factors may also affect the comparability of our operating and historical financial results in future periods.
81
PUAE Tariffs Affect our Results in our Israel Segment
In Israel, sales of IPPs are generally made on the basis of PPAs for the sale of energy to customers, with prices predominantly linked to the tariff issued by the PUAE and denominated in New Israeli Shekels.
The PUAE operates a time of use tariff, which provides different energy rates for different seasons (e.g., summer and winter) and different periods of time during the day. Within Israel, the price of energy varies by season and demand period. For further information on Israels seasonality and the related PUAE tariffs, see Industry Israel.
The PUAEs rates have affected our revenues and income in the periods under review. PUAE tariffs in the period 2012 to 2014 were incrementally higher to reflect higher fuel prices in 2012, which the PUAE determined would be reflected in higher tariffs in 2012-2014. The revenues in our Israel segment in the first half of 2015 were affected by the lower PUAE tariffs in 2015, as discussed further below. Additionally, on September 8, 2015, the PUAE published a final decision, which became effective on September 13, 2015, which further reduced the PUAE generation component tariff by approximately 12% from NIS 300.9 per MWh and NIS 301.5 per MWh to a single tariff of NIS 265.2 per MWh. As a result of previous declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, OPC will begin to pay the ultimate floor price set forth in its supply agreement in November 2015. Therefore, the recent September 2015 decline and any further declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, will not result in a corresponding decline in OPCs natural gas expenses, and will lead to a greater decline in the sales price of OPCs energy, revenues and, therefore, margins. For further information on the PUAE and the PUAE tariffs, see Business Regulation of the Israeli Electricity Sector PUAE .
Operating Results
The following discussion of our results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB. The discussion of the results of our business segments is based upon the financial information reported for each of the segments of our business, and is presented in the tables below, which set forth the results of each of our segments and the reconciliation of these results of our segments to our consolidated results of operations. This segment information was prepared on the same basis as the information that our senior management uses to allocate resources among segments and evaluate their performance. We evaluate and manage the performance of our segments based on information generated from our statutory accounting records maintained in accordance with IFRS, and reflected in our consolidated financial statements.
In the following discussion, references to increases or declines in any period are made by comparison with the corresponding prior period, except as the context otherwise indicates.
82
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
Set forth below are our condensed consolidated statements of income data for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
%
Change |
|||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Income |
||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 655 | $ | 661 | (1 | ) | ||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
(458 | ) | (468 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(54 | ) | (48 | ) | 13 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Gross profit |
143 | 145 | 1 | |||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(31 | ) | (30 | ) | 3 | |||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| 48 | | |||||||||
Measurement to value of pre-existing share |
| 3 | | |||||||||
Other expenses |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | | |||||||
Other income |
2 | 3 | (33 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Operating income |
113 | 168 | (33 | ) | ||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
53 | 67 | (21 | ) | ||||||||
Share in income of companies, net of tax |
| 2 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
60 | 103 | (42 | ) | ||||||||
Taxes on income |
(21 | ) | (31 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 39 | $ | 72 | (46 | ) | ||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
4 | 7 | (43 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income for the period |
$ | 43 | $ | 79 | (46 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||
Equity holders of the Company |
33 | 66 | (50 | ) | ||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
10 | 13 | (23 | ) |
83
Set forth below are the results of each of our segments and our consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Adjustments |
Consolidated
Results |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
225 | 157 | 175 | 98 | | 655 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(139 | ) | (112 | ) | (140 | ) | (67 | ) | | (458 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(25 | ) | (12 | ) | (10 | ) | (12 | ) | 5 | (54 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross profit |
61 | 33 | 25 | 19 | 5 | 143 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(8 | ) | (3 | ) | (6 | ) | (14 | ) | | (31 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income, net |
| 1 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
53 | 31 | 19 | 5 | 5 | 113 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(20 | ) | (13 | ) | (5 | ) | (15 | ) | | (53 | ) | |||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes from continuing operations |
33 | 18 | 14 | (10 | ) | 5 | 60 | |||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(11 | ) | (5 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
22 | 13 | 11 | (11 | ) | 4 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | 4 | | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) for the period |
22 | 13 | 11 | (7 | ) | 4 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating margin |
24 | % | 20 | % | 11 | % | 9 | % | | 17 | % |
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru | Israel |
Central
America |
Other | Adjustments |
Consolidated
Results |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
225 | 202 | 136 | 98 | | 661 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(145 | ) | (141 | ) | (113 | ) | (69 | ) | | (468 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(21 | ) | (13 | ) | (8 | ) | (11 | ) | 5 | (48 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross profit |
59 | 48 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 145 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(9 | ) | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | (14 | ) | | (30 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income (loss), net |
3 | | 1 | (1 | ) | | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
53 | 44 | 12 | 54 | 5 | 168 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(17 | ) | (15 | ) | (3 | ) | (32 | ) | | (67 | ) | |||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| | | 2 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
36 | 29 | 9 | 24 | 5 | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(12 | ) | (7 | ) | (2 | ) | (8 | ) | (1 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
24 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 4 | 72 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | 7 | | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
24 | 21 | 7 | 23 | 4 | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating margin |
24 | % | 22 | % | 9 | % | 55 | % | | 25 | % |
84
Sales
Our sales decreased by $6 million, or 1%, to $655 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $661 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. This decrease was primarily driven by a decrease in our Israel segments sales during the period and was partially offset by our acquisition and consolidation of various businesses during 2014, as set forth in further detail below by segment:
Peru Segment
| Sales from our Peru segment were $225 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, despite a 5% decrease in the volume of energy sold by Kallpa to 3,191 GWh of energy for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from 3,361 GWh sold during the same period in 2014. This decrease was offset by a 7% increase in the average energy price charged by Kallpa to $48 per MWh in the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $45 per MWh in the same period in 2014. |
Kallpa generated:
| $152 million in revenue from energy sales for the six months ended June 30, 2015 compared to $151 million in the same period in 2014; |
| $35 million revenue from capacity sales for the six months ended June 30, 2015, representing a 10% decrease from the $39 million generated in the same period in 2014, primarily as a result of a 6% decrease in capacity sales to 930 MW for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from 988 MW during the same period in 2014, which resulted from the expiration of an opportunistic short-term PPA in April 2014 and a 5% decline in average capacity prices as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the Peruvian Nuevo Sol during 2015, which affected the prices at which we sold capacity to our regulated clients during the period, as prices to these customers are linked to the U.S. Dollar, but are not adjusted unless exchange rate fluctuations exceed the minimum adjustment thresholds set forth in our PPAs ( i.e., during the six months ended June 30, 2015, no price adjustments were made despite the exchange rate fluctuations); and |
| $38 million in revenue from ancillary businesses for the six months ended June 30, 2015, representing a 9% increase from the $35 million generated in the same period in 2014, primarily as a result of a credit of $2 million towards Kallpas transmission expenses in May 2015 as a result of COES determination that Kallpa had overpaid its secondary system transmission expenses by such amount during the May 2014 April 2015 period. |
Israel Segment
| Sales from our Israel segment decreased by $45 million, or 22%, to $157 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $202 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, as a result of a decrease in OPC´s revenue from energy sales. This decrease in sales is largely due to a decline in the PUAE generation component tariff in 2015, as PUAE tariffs in the period 2012 to 2014 were incrementally higher than in previous years so as to reflect higher fuel prices in 2012. This tariff forms the basis of OPCs energy prices, so the decline in the tariff in 2015 led to a decline in sales. To a lesser degree, the decline in sales was also the result of the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel, OPCs functional currency. As a result of these factors, OPC experienced a 22% decline in the average price of the energy it sold to $80 per MWh for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $103 per MWh during the same period in 2014. |
The volume of energy sold by OPC during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 was 1,965 GWh and 1,962 GWh, respectively.
85
Central America Segment
| Sales from our Central America segment increased by $39 million, or 29%, to $175 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $136 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of our acquisition and consolidation of ICPNH in March 2014 (which generated $57 million in sales during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to $53 million in sales during the same period in 2014) and Puerto Quetzal (which generated $60 million in sales during the six months ended June 30, 2015), which we began consolidating in March 2014 and September 2014, respectively. This increase was partially offset by (1) a $16 million, or 23%, reduction in Nejapas sales, primarily as a result of a decline in realized energy prices due to a decline in HFO prices and (2) a $9 million, or 64%, decline in Cenergicas sales, primarily as a result of a decline in energy trading services, which reduced Cenergicas energy sales to $5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $14 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. |
Other Segment
| Sales from our Other segment decreased by $1 million, or 1%, to $98 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $99 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of our acquisition and consolidation of JPPC (which generated $24 million in sales during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to $7 million in sales during the same period in 2014) and Surpetroil (which generated $4 million in sales during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to $2 million in sales during the same period in 2014), which we began consolidating in May 2014 and March 2014, respectively. These increases were offset by a $20 million, or 50%, reduction in CEPPs sales, primarily as a result of the expiration of CEPPs PPA in September 2014, and the consequent sale of energy at spot market prices which were lower than the contracted price set forth in the PPA, which resulted in the decline in sales despite an increase in energy generation. |
Cost of Sales (Excluding Depreciation and Amortization)
Our cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) decreased by $10 million, or 2%, to $458 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $468 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. This was primarily a result of (1) a decrease in our Peru segments energy and capacity purchases and (2) a decline in the PUAE generation component tariff, which affected OPCs cost of sales (as gas prices under our supply agreement are linked to the PUAE generation component tariff), which declines were offset by increases resulting from our acquisition and consolidation of various businesses during 2014, as set forth in further detail below by segment:
Peru Segment
| Cost of sales from our Peru segment decreased by $6 million, or 4%, to $139 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $145 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of: |
| a $4 million, or 15%, decline in spot energy purchases to $23 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $27 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, as a result of a decrease in purchases of energy from the spot market due to the expiration of a short-term, opportunistic PPA in 2014; |
| a $4 million decline in gas expenses as a result of a 34% decline in Kallpas generation, the effect of which was partially offset by an increase in the natural gas prices paid by Kallpa; |
| a $1 million decline in transmission charges as a result of a 5% decrease in the volume of energy sold by Kallpa to 3,191 GWh for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from 3,361 GWh during the same period in 2014 due to the expiration of a short-term, opportunistic PPA in 2014; and |
86
| a $3 million maintenance expense for scheduled maintenance on Kallpa I during the first quarter of 2015, which offset in part the declines mentioned above. |
Israel Segment
| Cost of sales from our Israel segment decreased by $29 million, or 21%, to $112 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $141 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 due to: |
| a $6 million, or 8% decline in OPCs natural gas expenses, primarily resulting from a decline in the natural gas prices paid by OPC as a result of a lower PUAE generation component tariff, which tariff serves as the base for the natural gas price linkage formula in OPCs gas supply agreement. This decline was partially offset by an increase in OPCs gas consumption as a result of a 4% increase in OPCs generation during the six months ended June 30, 2015; |
| an $18 million decline in system charges and diesel oil surcharge provisions during the six months ended June 30, 2015; and |
| the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel, OPCs functional currency. |
Central America Segment
| Cost of sales from our Central America segment increased by $27 million, or 24%, to $140 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $113 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of our acquisition and consolidation of ICPNH (which incurred cost of sales of $37 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to $39 million in cost of sales during the same period in 2014) and Puerto Quetzal (which incurred cost of sales of $54 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015) which we began consolidating in March 2014 and September 2014, respectively. This increase was partially offset by a $17 million, or 27%, decline in Nejapas cost of sales, primarily as a result of a decline in HFO prices and a $9 million, or 75%, decline in Cenergicas cost of sales, primarily as a result of a decline in energy trading services, which reduced Cenergicas energy purchases by $8 million to $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $10 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. |
Other Segment
| Cost of sales from our Other segment decreased by $2 million, or 3%, to $67 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $69 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of (1) a $13 million, or 43%, decline in CEPPs cost of sales, primarily due to a decline in the price of fuel purchased by CEPP, despite an increase in energy generation, and (2) a $5 million decline in Colmitos cost of sales, primarily due to a decline in energy purchased by Colmito in connection with Colmitos generation of energy during the period. This decline was partially offset by our acquisition and consolidation of JPPC (which incurred cost of sales of $21 million during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to $6 million in cost of sales during the same period in 2014) in May 2014. |
Depreciation and Amortization
Our depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $6 million, or 12%, to $54 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $48 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of the increase in our depreciable property, plant and equipment as a result of:
| the acquisition of Las Flores in April 2014, which increased our Peru segments depreciation expense by $4 million, or 19%, to $25 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014; |
87
| a $2 million, or 25%, increase in our Central America segments depreciation expense to $10 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of our consolidation of ICPNH and Puerto Quetzal in March and September 2014, respectively; and |
| a $1 million, or 9%, increase in our Other segments depreciation expense to $12 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $11 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of our consolidation of JPPC. |
These increases were partially offset by a decline of $1 million, or 8%, in our Israel segments depreciation expense to $12 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $13 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
General, Selling and Administrative Expenses
Our general, selling and administrative expenses increased by $1 million, or 3%, to $31 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $30 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, which reflected the consolidation of general, selling and administrative expenses in an aggregate amount of $6 million and $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, as a result of our consolidation of ICPNH, Surpetroil, JPPC and Puerto Quetzal from the dates of their respective acquisitions in March 2014, March 2014, May 2014 and September 2014, respectively, which was partially offset by a $3 million decrease in Inkias legal fees to $323 thousand as a result of litigation relating to Crystal Power, which was settled in December 2014.
Gain on Bargain Purchase
We did not generate any gains on bargain purchase during the six months ended June 30, 2015. We generated $48 million in gain on bargain purchase during the six months ended June 30, 2014, reflecting our acquisition of:
| ICPNH in March 2014, which resulted in our recognition of a gain of $24 million; and |
| the 84% of the outstanding equity of JPPC which we did not previously own, in May 2014, resulting in our recognition of a gain of $24 million. |
Operating Income
As a result of the above, our operating income decreased by 33% to $113 million in the six months ended June 30, 2015, resulting in an operating margin of 17%, as compared to an operating income and operating margin of $168 million and 25%, respectively, in the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Financing Expenses, Net
Our financing expenses, net, declined by $14 million, or 21%, to $53 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $67 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as set forth in further detail below by segment:
Peru Segment
| Financing expenses, net, from our Peru segment increased by $3 million, or 18%, to $20 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $17 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of an increase in foreign exchange rate losses as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Peruvian Nuevo Sol during the six months ended June 30, 2015. |
88
Israel Segment
| Financing expenses, net, from our Israel segment declined by $2 million, or 13%, to $13 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $15 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of a decrease in OPCs interest expense due to a 0.5% CPI decrease, which was partially offset by the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar against the New Israeli Shekel, OPCs functional currency. |
Central America Segment
| Financing expenses, net, from our Central America segment increased by $2 million, or 67%, to $5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, as a result of the consolidation of interest expense of $3 million resulting from our acquisitions of ICPNH and Puerto Quetzal in March and September 2014, respectively. |
Other Segment
| Financing expenses, net, from our Other segment declined by $17 million, or 53%, to $15 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $32 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 primarily as a result of (1) the recognition of $13 million in finance expenses in the six months ended June 30, 2014 as a result of repaying $95 million of capital notes to IC, reflecting the difference between the nominal value of the capital notes ($95 million) and the book value of the capital notes ($82 million) and (2) an $8 million decrease in interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2015 due to our repayment of $263 million of debt owed to IC, our former parent, during May and June 2014. These effects were partially offset by a $3 million increase in interest expense during the six months ended June 30, 2015, primarily as a result of the drawing of ICPIs mezzanine loan in June 2014. |
Share In Income (Loss) of Associated Companies
Our share in income of associated companies, which is comprised entirely of our proportionate interest in Pedregals results of operations, decreased to $116 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Taxes on Income
Our tax expenses decreased to $21 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $31 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. This decrease was primarily the result of our recognition of $8 million in withholding taxes in the six months ended June 30, 2014 in connection with our receipt of dividends from Inkia. We did not have a corresponding tax payment in the six months ended June 30, 2015.
Our effective tax rate increased to 33% for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from 30% for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily as a result of the effects of a one-time non-taxable gain recorded during 2014 (which largely consists of a $48 million gain on bargain purchase we recorded in connection with our acquisitions of ICPNH and JPPC in March and May 2014, respectively). In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, our effective tax rate was higher than our Israeli statutory tax rate of 26.5% and 25%, respectively, due to a higher contribution from our Peru segment (where our corporate income tax rate is 30%).
Net Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
Our net income from discontinued operations, net of tax was $4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to $7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax, for the six months ended June 30, 2015 reflected a $4 million dividend received from
89
Edegel post-equity method accounting. Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 reflected the results of Acter Holdings, which primarily consisted of our proportionate share of Generandes results of operations during the period. Additional detail on Generandes historic financial performance can be found in Generandes separate financial statements, which we have included in this prospectus.
Net Income for the Period
As a result of the factors described above, our net income for the period decreased to $43 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to $79 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013
Set forth below are our consolidated statements of income data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Years Ended
|
%
|
|||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Income |
||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 1,372 | $ | 873 | 57 | |||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
(936 | ) | (594 | ) | 58 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(101 | ) | (72 | ) | 40 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Gross profit |
335 | 207 | 62 | |||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(68 | ) | (41 | ) | 66 | |||||||
Asset write-off |
(35 | ) | | | ||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
68 | 1 | 6,700 | |||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
3 | | | |||||||||
Other expenses |
(12 | ) | | | ||||||||
Other income |
17 | 5 | 240 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Operating income |
308 | 172 | 79 | |||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
119 | 80 | 49 | |||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
2 | 2 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
191 | 94 | 103 | |||||||||
Taxes on income |
(51 | ) | (41 | ) | 24 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 140 | $ | 53 | 164 | |||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
128 | 28 | 357 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income for the period |
$ | 268 | $ | 81 | 231 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||
Equity holders of the Company |
$ | 236 | $ | 66 | 258 | |||||||
Non-controlling interest |
32 | 15 | 113 |
90
Set forth below are the results of each of our segments and our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru |
Israel |
Central
|
Other |
Adjustments |
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 437 | $ | 413 | $ | 308 | $ | 214 | | $ | 1,372 | |||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(270 | ) | (252 | ) | (260 | ) | (154 | ) | | (936 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(45 | ) | (25 | ) | (18 | ) | (22 | ) | 9 | (101 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross profit |
122 | 136 | 30 | 38 | 9 | 335 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(17 | ) | (8 | ) | (9 | ) | (34 | ) | | (68 | ) | |||||||||||||
Asset write-off |
| | | (35 | ) | | (35 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other income (loss), net |
3 | | | 3 | (1 | ) | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
108 | 127 | 21 | 43 | 9 | 308 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(34 | ) | (30 | ) | (8 | ) | (46 | ) | (1 | ) | (119 | ) | ||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| | | 2 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes from continuing operations |
$ | 74 | $ | 97 | $ | 13 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 8 | $ | 191 | |||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(17 | ) | (25 | ) | (5 | ) | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
57 | 71 | 9 | (4 | ) | 7 | 140 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | 128 | | 128 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
$ | 57 | $ | 71 | $ | 9 | $ | 124 | $ | 7 | $ | 268 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating margin |
25 | % | 31 | % | 7 | % | 20 | % | | 22 | % |
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru |
Israel |
Central
|
Other |
Adjustments |
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 394 | $ | 187 | $ | 147 | $ | 145 | | $ | 873 | |||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(239 | ) | (139 | ) | (127 | ) | (89 | ) | | (594 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(40 | ) | (12 | ) | (9 | ) | (21 | ) | 10 | (72 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross profit |
115 | 36 | 11 | 35 | 10 | 207 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(16 | ) | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | (16 | ) | | (41 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income (loss), net |
1 | (1 | ) | | 3 | | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
101 | 31 | 7 | 23 | 10 | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(34 | ) | (22 | ) | | (23 | ) | (1 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| | | 2 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
$ | 67 | $ | 9 | $ | 7 | $ | 2 | $ | 9 | $ | 94 | ||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(25 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (10 | ) | (2 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
42 | 7 | 5 | (8 | ) | 7 | 53 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | 28 | | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
$ | 42 | $ | 7 | $ | 5 | $ | 20 | $ | 7 | $ | 81 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating margin |
26 | % | 17 | % | 5 | % | 16 | % | | 20 | % |
91
Sales
Our sales increased by $499 million, or 57%, to $1,372 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $873 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase was primarily driven by (1) the acquisition of the Las Flores plant in 2013 in our Peru segment, (2) the first full year of operations of OPC in our Israel segment, and (3) our acquisition and consolidation of various businesses during 2014, as set forth in further detail below by segment:
Peru Segment
| Sales from our Peru segment increased by $43 million, or 11%, to $437 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $394 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily as a result of: |
| a $24 million, or 9%, increase in Kallpas revenue from energy sales to $291 million in 2014 from $267 million during 2013, primarily as a result of a $9 million, or 3%, increase in revenue resulting from an increase in the volume of energy sales by Kallpa to 6,559 GWh in 2014 from 6,352 GWh in 2013 and a $13 million, or 5%, increase in revenue resulting from an increase in Kallpas average energy price to $44 per MWh in 2014 from $42 per MWh in 2013 principally due to the commencement of service under certain PPAs with distribution companies which provided for the sale of energy at higher prices, and included a pass-through of the cost of the gas distribution tariff which was imposed on generators in Chilca as of January 1, 2014 in connection with the completion of a gas pipeline constructed by Gas Natural de Lima y Callao S.A., or Calidda, which has a concession to distribute gas from Chilca to Lima, and within Lima; |
| a $10 million, or 18%, increase in Kallpas revenue from ancillary services (principally transmission tolls that are passed through to Kallpas customers) as a result of a 19% increase in the primary toll system tariff during 2014; and |
| a $5 million, or 7%, increase in Kallpas revenue from capacity sales to $73 million during 2014 from $68 million during 2013, primarily as a result of a 6% increase in revenue resulting from an increase in the volume of capacity sales to an average of 929 MW in 2014 from an average of 880 MW in 2013, which was principally due to our acquisition of the Las Flores plant in April 2014. |
Israel Segment
| Sales from our Israel segment increased by $226 million, or 121%, to $413 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $187 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily as a result of the first full year of operations of OPC, which commenced commercial operations in July 2013. OPCs revenue from energy sales increased by $225 million, or 120%, to $412 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, from $187 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, principally as a result of a $225 million, or 119%, increase in revenue resulting from an increase in the volume of energy sold to 3,973 GWh in 2014 from 1,813 GWh in 2013, which reflects a full year of commercial operations of OPCs plant during 2014 and an increase in the average price of energy sold to $104 per GWh in 2014 from $103 per GWh in 2013. |
Central America Segment
| Sales from our Central America segment increased by $161 million, or 110%, to $308 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $147 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily as a result of our acquisition and consolidation of ICPNH (which generated sales of $125 million since our acquisition of it in March 2014) and Puerto Quetzal (which generated sales of $33 million since our acquisition of it in September 2014). |
92
Other Segment
| Sales from our Other segment increased by $69 million, or 48%, to $214 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $145 million for the year ended December 31,2013 primarily as a result of our acquisition and consolidation of JPPC (which generated sales of $41 million since our acquisition of it in May 2014), Colmito (which generated sales of $38 million since our acquisition of it in October 2013) and Surpetroil (which generated sales of $9 million since our acquisition of it in March 2014). These effects were partially offset by a $19 million, or 21%, reduction in CEPPs revenues to $73 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $92 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily as a result of the expiration of its PPA in September 2014 and a change in CEPPs position in the dispatch order as a result of the entry of an additional, more efficient power plant in the Dominican Republic. |
Cost of Sales (Excluding Depreciation and Amortization)
Our cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) increased by $342 million, or 58%, to $936 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $594 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. This increase was primarily driven by (1) the imposition of certain tariffs in Peru as of January 1, 2014 in our Peru segment, (2) the first full year of operations of OPC in our Israel segment, (3) our acquisition and consolidation of various businesses during 2014, as set forth in further detail below by segment:
Peru Segment
| Cost of sales from our Peru segment increased by $31 million, or 13%, to $270 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $239 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of: |
| a $27 million, or 24%, increase in Kallpas gas and gas transportation and distribution costs to $139 million in 2014 from $112 million in 2013, as a result of (1) the commencement of Caliddas gas distribution services, which increased Kallpas gas costs by $18 million, and (2) a $9 million increase in Kallpas natural gas costs primarily as a result of an 8% increase in gross energy generated by Kallpa to 5,920 GWh in 2014 from 5,459 GWh in 2013; |
| a $13 million, or 20%, increase in Kallpas transmission costs to $77 million in 2014 from $64 million in 2013, as a result of a 19% increase in the primary toll system tariff; and |
| a $9 million, or 22%, decrease in Kallpas cost for purchases of energy and capacity as a result of an 8% increase in energy generated by Kallpa to 5,920 GWh in 2014 from 5,459 GWh in 2013 which resulted in a reduction in Kallpas spot market purchases, which partially offset the above-described increases. |
Israel Segment
| Cost of sales from our Israel segment increased by $113 million, or 81%, to $252 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $139 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of an increase in the gross energy generated by OPC to 3,465 GWh in 2014 from 1,357 GWh in 2013, reflecting a full year of commercial operations of this plant during 2014, as compared to approximately six months of commercial operations of this plant in 2013 following its COD in July 2013. |
93
Central America Segment
| Cost of sales from our Central America segment increased by $133 million, or 105%, to $260 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $127 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of: |
| our acquisition and consolidation of ICPNH (which incurred cost of sales of $98 million since our acquisition of it in March 2014) and Puerto Quetzal (which incurred cost of sales of $29 million since our acquisition of it in September 2014). The consolidation of these entities increased our cost of sales as follows: (1) our fuel and lubricants costs increased by $98 million; (b) our purchases of energy and capacity increased by $12 million; (c) our maintenance expenses increased by $8 million; and (d) our personnel expenses increased by $4 million; |
| an $11 million, or 30%, increase in energy purchased by Nejapa, primarily as a result of an increase in sales in 2014, despite a lower amount of energy generated by Nejapa, which reduction was due to an increase in low cost energy purchased by the electricity system in El Salvador from other SIEPAC countries, primarily Guatemala; and |
| a $12 million, or 17%, decrease in Nejapas fuel costs as a result of the reduction of its generation activities, which partially offset the increases above. |
Other Segment
| Cost of sales from our Other segment increased by $65 million, or 73%, to $154 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $89 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of: |
| our acquisition and consolidation of JPPC (which incurred cost of sales of $40 million since our acquisition of it in May 2014) and Surpetroil (which incurred cost of sales of $2 million since our acquisition of it in March 2014). The consolidation of these entities increased our cost of sales as follows: (a) our fuel, gas and lubricants costs increased by $34 million; (b) our maintenance expenses increased by $3 million and (c) our personnel expenses increased by $2 million; |
| a $36 million increase in our cost of sales as a result of our acquisition and consolidation of Colmito, which we acquired in October 2013, primarily as a result of the $32 million energy and capacity purchases made by Colmito to supply its PPA with ENAP Refinerías S.A., which commenced in January 2014; and |
| a $17 million, or 33%, decline in CEPPs fuel costs in connection with a 29% decrease in CEPPs gross generation to 242 GWh in 2014 from 339 GWh in 2013 primarily as a result of a change in CEPPs position in the dispatch order as a result of the entry of an additional, more efficient power plant, which partially offset the above-described increases. |
Depreciation and Amortization
Our depreciation and amortization expenses increased by $29 million, or 40%, to $101 million in 2014 from $72 million in 2013, primarily as a result of the increase in our depreciable property, plant and equipment as a result of depreciation expenses related to (1) a full year of commercial operations of OPC during 2014, as compared to approximately six months of commercial operations of this plant following its COD in July 2013, which increased OPCs depreciation from $12 million in 2013 to $25 million in 2014, (2) the acquisitions of ICPNH, Surpetroil, JPPC, and Puerto Quetzal, which contributed $12 million to our consolidated depreciation in 2014, and (3) the acquisition of Las Flores in April 2014, which increased Kallpas depreciation expense by $5 million from $40 million in 2013 to $45 million in 2014.
94
General, Selling and Administrative Expenses
Our general, selling and administrative expenses increased by $27 million, or 66%, to $68 million for 2014 from $41 million for 2013. This increase was primarily driven by (1) the consolidation of general, selling and administrative expenses in an aggregate amount of $9 million as a result of our consolidation of ICPNH, Surpetroil, JPPC and Puerto Quetzal from the dates of their respective acquisitions in March 2014, March 2014, May 2014 and September 2014; (2) an $8 million increase in legal fees to $11 million from $3 million, primarily due to a $7 million increase in Inkias legal fees as a result of litigation relating to Crystal Power, which was settled in December 2014; (3) a $3 million increase in OPCs general, selling and administrative expenses to $8 million in 2014 from $5 million in 2013 as a result of the commencement of OPCs commercial operations in July 2013 (certain of OPCs general, selling and administrative expenses were capitalized prior to the beginning of OPCs commercial operations in July 2013); and (4) a $2 million increase in amortization expenses as a result of the purchase price allocation adjustments made in connection with our acquisitions of ICPNH, Surpetroil, JPPC and Puerto Quetzal.
Asset Write-Off
Our $35 million asset write-off in 2014 is comprised of an impairment charge in respect of Inkias impairment of one of its subsidiaries. For further information, see Critical Accounting Policies and Significant EstimatesImpairment Analysis.
Other Expenses
Our other expenses increased significantly to $12 million for 2014. This increase was primarily driven by a $7 million charge as a result of our retirement of certain of Amayo IIs assetsthree wind turbines which were damaged in December 2014 in connection with a blackout in the Nicaraguan national interconnection system, or SIN, which left one wind turbine collapsed and another two wind turbines with severe damageand the loss of income relating to these assets. For further information on the damaged turbines, see BusinessProperty, Plant and Equipment .
Other Income
Our other income increased significantly to $17 million for 2014 from $5 million for 2013. In 2014, our other income consisted primarily of (1) $7 million related to insurance claims, primarily in respect of Amayo IIs claims regarding three of its wind turbines which were damaged in December 2014 and (2) $4 million in dividend income from Generandes which, although declared in November 2014 after the consummation of our disposition of Generandes, was distributed to us in December 2014 pursuant to the terms of our sale agreement. In 2013, our other income consisted of (1) $4 million of non-operating income and (2) $1 million of dividends received from JPPC.
Gain on Bargain Purchase
Our gain on bargain purchase increased significantly to $68 million for 2014 from $1 million for 2013. This increase was driven by the negative goodwill generated in connection with our acquisition of:
| ICPNH in March 2014, which resulted in our recognition of a gain of $24 million; |
| the 84% of the outstanding equity of JPPC, which we did not previously own, in May 2014, resulting in our recognition of a gain of $24 million; and |
| Puerto Quetzal in September 2014, which resulted in our recognition of a gain of $20 million. |
95
Operating Income
As a result of the above, our operating income increased by 79% to $308 million for 2014, resulting in an operating margin of 22%, as compared to an operating income and operating margin of $172 million and 20%, respectively, for 2013.
Financing Expenses, Net
Our financing expenses, net, increased by 49% to $119 million for 2014 from $80 million for 2013 as set forth in further detail below by segment:
Peru Segment
| Financing expenses, net from our Peru segment were $34 million in both 2013 and 2014 reflecting a $3 million increase in interest expense from banks and others to $33 million, primarily as a result of interest expenses relating to Las Flores leases (accrued since our acquisition of Las Flores in April 2014). This increase was partially offset by a $4 million decline in foreign currency loss due to the depreciation of the Peruvian Nuevo Soles against the U.S. dollar during 2014. |
Israel Segment
| Financing expenses, net, from our Israel segment increased by $8 million, or 36%, to $30 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $22 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of a $5 million increase in OPC´s interest expense from banks and others to $22 million in 2014 from $17 million in 2013. Prior to OPCs COD in July 2013, OPCs interest expense was capitalized. |
Central America Segment
| Financing expenses, net, from our Central America segment increased by $8 million, or 100%, to $8 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, primarily as a result of the recognition of $7 million of interest expense relating to ICPNHs debt, as a result of our acquisition, and consolidation, of ICPNH in March 2014. |
Other Segment
| Financing expenses, net, from our Other segment increased by $23 million, or 100%, to $46 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $23 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 primarily as a result of (1) the recognition of $13 million in finance expenses as a result of repaying $95 million of capital notes to IC, reflecting the difference between the nominal value of the capital notes ($95 million) and the book value of the capital notes ($82 million); (2) a $9 million increase in Inkias interest expense from banks and others to $21 million in 2014 from $12 million in 2013, primarily as a result of our incurrence of a full year of interest expense in respect of Inkias incremental $150 million senior notes, which were issued in September 2013, and interest expense relating to Inkias $125 million credit facility (which was entered into in December 2013 and fully paid in August 2014); (3) a $3 million increase in interest expense in respect of ICPIs NIS 350 million ($93 million) mezzanine financing agreement, which ICPI entered into in June 2014; and (4) a $2 million increase in Colmitos interest expense from banks and others, primarily as a result of Colmitos incurrence of additional debt in February 2014. These effects were partially offset by a $4 million decrease in interest expense on loans from our parent company to $7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 from $11 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, as a result of our repayment of the full outstanding amount of the loans owed to IC during May and June 2014. |
Share In Income of Associated Company
Our share in income of associated company, which is comprised of our proportionate interest in Pedregals results of operations, was $2 million for each of 2014 and 2013.
96
Taxes on Income
Our tax expenses increased to $51 million for 2014 from $41 million for 2013. Our tax expense in 2014 was affected by (1) a $24 million increase in OPCs income tax expense as a result of an increase in OPCs income before taxes, as compared to 2013; (2) an increase in the statutory income tax rate to 26.5% in 2014 from 25% in 2013; and (3) the recognition of a $2 million income tax expense as a result of our acquisition and consolidation of ICPNH, Puerto Quetzal, JPPC and Surpetroil during the period.
These effects were partially offset by (1) a $9 million deferred income tax gain arising from the $35 million write-off of assets recorded during 2014; (2) a $7 million deferred income tax gain from the exchange rate losses related to CDAs debt, which gains are capitalized for tax purposes; and (3) a $3 million decline in Kallpas deferred income tax expenses to $3 million in 2014 from $6 million in 2013, resulting from the translation effects of Kallpas non-monetary assets as a result of Kallpas payment of taxes in a currency that is different from its functional currency.
Our effective tax rate decreased to 26% for 2014 from 44% for 2013, as a result of non-taxable gain on bargain purchase recorded during 2014 (primarily comprised of the $68 million gain on bargain purchase we recorded in connection with the sale of our indirect interest in Edegel). In 2014, our effective tax rate was lower than our Israeli statutory tax rate of 26.5% as a result of income which was subject to tax at a different rate, non-deductible expenses and taxes in respect of foreign dividends, which effects were partially offset by taxes associated with certain exempt income. In 2013, our effective tax rate was higher than our Israeli statutory tax rate of 25% as a result of income which was subject to tax at a different rate, and non-deductible and other expenses, which effects were partially offset by taxes associated with our share in profits of associated companies.
Net Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
Our net income from discontinued operations, net of tax, increased significantly to $128 million for 2014 from $28 million for 2013, reflecting (1) the results of Acter Holdings, which includes our $18 million proportionate share of Generandes results of operations during the period and (2) $110 million net gain on sale of discontinued operations as a result of the sale of our interest in Generandes, through which we held our indirect interest in Edegel, which generated $157 million of capital gains, which were partially offset by $47 million of income tax expenses.
Net Income for the Period
As a result of the factors discussed above, our net income for the period increased by 231% to $268 million for 2014, as compared to $81 million for 2013.
97
Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012
Set forth below are our combined statements of income data for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
Years Ended
|
%
|
|||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Income |
||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 873 | $ | 576 | 52 | |||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
(594 | ) | (396 | ) | 50 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(72 | ) | (51 | ) | 41 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Gross profit |
207 | 129 | 60 | |||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(41 | ) | (37 | ) | 11 | |||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
1 | | | |||||||||
Other income |
5 | 7 | (29 | ) | ||||||||
Operating income |
172 | 99 | 74 | |||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
80 | 44 | 82 | |||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
2 | 2 | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
94 | 57 | 65 | |||||||||
Taxes on income |
(41 | ) | (20 | ) | 105 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
$ | 53 | $ | 37 | 43 | |||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
28 | 29 | (3 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income for the period |
$ | 81 | $ | 66 | 23 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||
Equity holders of the Company |
$ | 66 | $ | 57 | 16 | |||||||
Non-controlling interest |
15 | 9 | 67 |
98
Set forth below are the results of each of our segments and our consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru |
Israel |
Central
|
Other |
Adjustments |
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 394 | $ | 187 | $ | 147 | $ | 145 | | $ | 873 | |||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(239 | ) | (139 | ) | (127 | ) | (89 | ) | | (594 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(40 | ) | (12 | ) | (9 | ) | (21 | ) | 10 | (72 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross profit |
115 | 36 | 11 | 35 | 10 | 207 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(16 | ) | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | (16 | ) | | (41 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income (loss), net |
1 | (1 | ) | | 3 | | 4 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
101 | 31 | 7 | 23 | 10 | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(34 | ) | (22 | ) | | (23 | ) | (1 | ) | (80 | ) | |||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| | | 2 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
$ | 67 | $ | 9 | $ | 7 | $ | 2 | $ | 9 | $ | 94 | ||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(25 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (10 | ) | (2 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
42 | 7 | 5 | (8 | ) | 7 | 53 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | 28 | | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
$ | 42 | $ | 7 | $ | 5 | $ | 20 | $ | 7 | $ | 81 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating margin |
26 | % | 17 | % | 5 | % | 16 | % | | 20 | % |
Year Ended December 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru |
Israel |
Central
|
Other |
Adjustments |
Consolidated
|
|||||||||||||||||||
($ millions, except as otherwise indicated) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
$ | 276 | $ | | $ | 155 | $ | 145 | $ | | $ | 576 | ||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(177 | ) | | (132 | ) | (87 | ) | | (396 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(32 | ) | | (9 | ) | (20 | ) | 10 | (51 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross profit |
67 | | 14 | 38 | 10 | 129 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(10 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (19 | ) | | (37 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income (loss), net |
2 | | | 5 | (1 | ) | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
59 | (4 | ) | 11 | 24 | 9 | 99 | |||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(17 | ) | (4 | ) | | (24 | ) | 1 | (44 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| | | 2 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes from continuing operations |
$ | 42 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 11 | $ | 2 | $ | 10 | $ | 57 | |||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(10 | ) | 2 | (3 | ) | (8 | ) | (1 | ) | (20 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
32 | (6 | ) | 7 | (5 | ) | 9 | 37 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | 29 | | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) for the period |
$ | 32 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 7 | $ | 24 | $ | 9 | $ | 66 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating margin |
21 | % | | 7 | % | 17 | % | | 17 | % |
99
Sales
Our sales increased by $297 million, or 52%, to $873 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $576 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. This increase was primarily driven by (1) a full year of operations of Kallpas combined cycle facility in our Peru segment, and (2) the commencement of OPCs operations in July 2013 in our Israel segment, as set forth in further detail below by segment:
Peru Segment
| Sales from our Peru segment increased by $118 million, or 43%, to $394 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $276 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily as a result of a full year of operations of Kallpas combined cycle unit during 2013, as compared to four months of operations of this unit following the commencement of this units commercial operations in August 2012. Kallpa experienced: |
| a $77 million, or 41%, increase in its revenue from energy sales to $267 million in 2013 from $190 million in 2012, principally as a result of a $78 million, or 42%, increase in revenue resulting from an increase in the volume of energy sales to 6,352 GWh in 2013 from 4,483 GWh in 2012 largely due to Kallpas entry into additional PPAs supported by the conversion of the Kallpa plant to a combined cycle operation in August 2012; |
| a $23 million, or 68%, increase in Kallpas revenue from ancillary services related to Kallpas energy sales (principally transmission tolls that are passed through to Kallpas customers) to $57 million in 2013 from $34 million in 2012; and |
| an $18 million, or 36%, increase in Kallpas revenue from capacity sales to $68 million in 2013 from $50 million in 2012, primarily as a result of a 39% increase in revenue resulting from an increase in the volume of capacity sales to an average of 880 MW in 2013 from an average of 634 MW in 2012, principally due to a full year of capacity sales in 2013 subsequent to the conversion and expansion of the Kallpa facility, as compared to four months of capacity sales subsequent to Kallpas conversion and expansion in 2012. |
Israel Segment
| Sales from our Israel segment were $187 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 (compared to nil sales in 2012), as a result of OPCs commencement of commercial operations in July 2013. OPCs energy sales were $187 million in 2013 as a result of its sale of 1,813 GWh of energy in 2013, reflecting an average energy price of $103 per GWh. |
Central America Segment
| Sales from our Central America segment decreased by $8 million, or 5%, to $147 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $155 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily as a result of a decline in the average sales price under PPAs during the period. |
Other Segment
| Sales from our Other segment were $145 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, reflecting (1) an increase in CEPPs average energy price and an increase in the volume of CEPPs energy sales due to an increase in sales under its PPA, which was offset by (2) a decrease in COBEEs average energy price and (3) a decline in Central Cardones spot capacity sales. |
100
Cost of Sales (Excluding Depreciation and Amortization)
Our cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) increased by $198 million, or 50%, to $594 million for 2013 from $396 million for 2012. This increase was primarily driven by (1) a full year of Kallpas combined cycle operations in our Peru segment, and (2) the commencement of OPCs operations in our Israel segment in July 2013, as set forth in further detail below by segment:
Peru Segment
| Cost of sales from our Peru segment increased by $62 million, or 35%, to $239 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $177 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily as a result of: |
| a $25 million, or 64%, increase in Kallpas transmission costs to $64 million in 2013 from $39 million in 2012, primarily as a result of the increase in energy sold by Kallpa under its PPAs supported by the conversion of Kallpas combined cycle in August 2012 and additional energy purchases necessitated by an unscheduled maintenance of one of Kallpas turbines in the first half of 2013; |
| a $25 million, or 156%, increase in Kallpas cost of purchases of energy and capacity to $41 million in 2013 from $16 million in 2012, largely due to a $14 million, or 211%, increase in energy purchased to 1,087 GWh in 2013 from 350 GWh in 2012 and an $11 million increase in capacity purchases, due to increased sales under PPAs; and |
| a $5 million, or 5%, increase in Kallpas natural gas costs to $112 million in 2013 from $107 million in 2012, primarily as a result of the effects of increases in the Producer Price Index and natural gas prices on the pricing formulas under Kallpas PPAs. |
Israel Segment
| Cost of sales from our Israel segment was $139 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 (nil in 2012), primarily as a result of OPCs gross energy generation of 1,357 GWh after its COD in July 2013. |
Central America Segment
| Cost of sales from our Central America segment decreased by $5 million, or 4%, to $127 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $132 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily as result of a $19 million, or 21%, decrease in Nejapas fuel costs as a result of its generation activities, which was partially offset by a $14 million, or 61%, increase in energy purchased by Nejapa due to an increase in low cost energy purchased from other SIEPAC countries, primarily Guatemala. |
Other Segment
| Cost of sales from our Other segment increased by $2 million, or 2%, to $89 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $87 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of a $2 million increase in COBEEs personnel expenses in connection with a one-time severance payment. |
Depreciation and Amortization
Our depreciation expenses increased by $21 million, or 41%, to $72 million in 2013 from $51 million in 2012, primarily as a result of the increase in our depreciable property, plant and equipment as a result of (1) the commencement of OPCs commercial operations in July 2013, which resulted in a $12 million increase in our
101
depreciation expense in 2013 and (2) a full year of operations of Kallpas combined cycle unit during 2013, as compared to approximately four months of operations of this unit in 2012, which resulted in an $8 million increase in our depreciation expense in 2013.
General, Selling and Administrative Expenses
Our general, selling and administrative expenses increased by $4 million, or 11%, to $41 million for 2013 from $37 million for 2012. This increase was primarily driven by a 25% increase in payroll and related expenses to $20 million in 2013 from $16 million in 2012, principally as a result of a $2 million increased profit sharing provision for Kallpas employees, a $1 million increase in deferred compensation expense, and a $0.3 million increase in OPCs salaries. These effects were partially offset by a $2 million, or 40%, decline in consultant and other professional services to $3 million in 2013 from $5 million in 2012, primarily as a result of one-time expenses incurred in 2012.
Other Income
Our other income decreased by 29% to $5 million for 2013 from $7 million for 2012. In 2013, our other income consisted of (1) $4 million of non-operating income, and (2) $0.6 million of dividends received from JPPC. In 2012, our other income consisted primarily of (1) $4 million of non-operating income and (2) $1 million of dividends received from JPPC.
Operating Income
As a result of the above, our operating income increased by 74% to $172 million for 2013, resulting in an operating margin of 20%, as compared to an operating income and operating margin of $99 million and 17%, respectively, for 2012.
Financing Expenses, Net
Our financing expenses, net, increased by $36 million, or 82%, to $80 million for 2013 from $44 million for 2012 as set forth in further detail below by segment:
Peru Segment
| Financing expenses, net, from our Peru segment increased by $17 million, or 100%, to $34 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $17 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily as a result of (1) the recognition of the interest on Kallpas syndicated loan agreement and bond following the COD of Kallpas combined cycle unit in 2012, which increased Kallpas interest expense to $30 million in 2013 from $19 million in 2012, as interest on these loans was capitalized prior to the commencement of the combined cycle plants operations in August 2012 and (2) the incurrence of exchange rate losses of $3 million in 2013 compared to exchange rate gains of $2 million in 2012, primarily as a result of the depreciation of the Peruvian Nuevos Soles against the U.S. Dollar during 2013. |
Israel Segment
|
Financing expenses, net, from our Israel segment increased by $18 million to $22 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 primarily as a result of (1) the recognition of the interest on OPCs debt following the COD of OPCs combined cycle plant in July 2013, which increased OPCs interest expense to $17 million in 2013 from $0 million in 2012, as interest expense was capitalized prior to OPCs COD in July 2013; (2) the recognition of the interest on capital notes from IC related to OPC, which increased OPCs interest expense from loans and capital notes from IC to $4 million in 2013 from $0 million in 2012, as |
102
interest on these notes was capitalized prior to OPCs COD in July 2013; and (3) a $234 thousand gain from the net change in fair value of derivative instruments in 2013 compared to a $4 million loss in 2012, primarily as a result of the increase in the LIBOR during 2013 compared to 2012. |
Central America Segment
| We had no meaningful interest expense in our Central America segment for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, as most of the businesses in our Central America segment were not purchased until 2014. |
Other Segment
| Financing expenses, net, from our Other segment decreased by $1 million, or 4% to $23 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $24 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of (1) the recognition of a $2 million gain in Central Cardones resulting from the net change in fair value of derivative instruments in 2013, compared to a $521 thousand loss in 2012, which was due to the increase in the LIBOR during 2013 compared to 2012 and (2) a $3 million increase in Inkias interest expense to $12 million in 2013 from $9 million in 2012, primarily as a result of interest expense related to Inkias $150 million senior note offering, which was completed in September 2013. |
Share in Income of Associated Company
Our share in income of associated company, which is comprised entirely of our proportionate interest in Pedregals results of operations, was $2 million for each of 2013 and 2012.
Taxes on Income
Our tax expenses increased by 105% to $41 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $20 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. This increase was primarily driven by:
| a $16 million increase in Kallpas tax expense to $26 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $10 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of (1) an $8 million increase in Kallpas tax expense reflecting an increase in Kallpas income before taxes, as compared to 2012 and (2) a $7 million increase in Kallpas tax expense arising from the changes in the exchange rate on the long-term debt which resulted in non-deductible expense; and |
| a $4 million increase in OPCs tax expense to $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 from $2 million income tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2012 as a result of an increase in OPCs income before taxes, as compared to 2013, due to the commencement of OPCs commercial operations in July 2013. |
Our effective tax rate increased to 44% for 2013 from 35% for 2012. In 2013 and 2012, our Israeli effective tax rates was higher than the statutory tax rate of 25% as a result of income which was subject to tax at a different rate, and non-deductible and other expenses, which effects were partially offset by taxes associated with our share in profits of associated companies.
Net Income from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
Our net income from discontinued operations, net of tax, decreased by 3% to $28 million for 2013 from $29 million for 2012, reflecting the results of Acter Holdings, which includes our proportionate share of Generandes results of operations during each of those periods. Additional detail on Generandes historic financial performance can be found in Generandes separate financial statements, which we have included in this prospectus.
103
Net Income For the Period
As a result of the above, our net income for the period increased by 23% to $81 million for 2013, as compared to $66 million for 2012.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had cash and cash equivalents of $436 million and $583 million and short-term deposits of $91 million and $119 million, respectively.
Our principal sources of liquidity have traditionally consisted of cash flows from operating activities, including dividends received from entities in which we own non-controlling interests; short-term and long-term borrowings; and sales of bonds in domestic and international capital markets. We do not have funds designated for, or subject to, permanent reinvestment in any country in which we operate. Distributions of the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are subject to the withholding taxes imposed by the foreign subsidiaries jurisdictions of incorporation. From time to time, however, we may be unable to receive dividends from our subsidiaries and associated company as a result of a lack of distributable reserves or limitations under our contractual arrangements. For example, our sale of our indirect interest in Edegel constituted an asset sale under Inkias indenture, pursuant to which Inkia is required to use the $235 million net proceeds from Inkias sale of its interest in Edegel within 30 months of Inkias receipt of such net proceeds ( i.e. , by March 2017) to reinvest in its operations through acquisitions, or capital expenditures, or to repay certain debt, failing which we must use any remaining proceeds to offer to repurchase these notes at 100% of principal amount plus accrued interest. As of June 30, 2015, Inkia has used $82 million of these net proceeds, to reinvest or to repay qualifying debt pursuant to the terms of such indenture. As such, as of June 30, 2015, we had $153 million of net proceeds remaining from our sale of our indirect interest in Edegel which are subject to this reinvestment requirement. In addition, we are also limited in our usage of certain cash, which we have designated as restricted in an aggregate amount of $93 million and $88 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, either because they are time deposits or as a result of the loan covenants relating to our Bolivian and Israeli assets and the loan covenants relating to certain of our Nicaraguan assets. For further information on potential limitations to our ability to receive dividends from certain of the entities in which we hold interests, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our BusinessWe are a holding company and are dependent upon cash flows from our subsidiaries and associated company to meet our existing and future obligations , Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our BusinessWe are significantly leveraged and Notes 14 and 20 to our audited financial statements included in this prospectus.
Our principal needs for liquidity generally consist of capital expenditures related to the development and construction of generation projects and the acquisition of other generation companies; working capital requirements ( e.g. , maintenance costs that extend the useful life of our plants); and dividends on our ordinary shares. As part of our growth strategy, we expect to develop, construct and operate greenfield projects in the markets that we serve as well as start projects or acquire controlling interests in operating assets within and outside Latin America. Our development of greenfield projects and our acquisition activities in the future may require us to make significant capital expenditures and/or raise significant capital. We believe that our liquidity is sufficient to cover our working capital needs in the ordinary course of our business.
104
Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2014
The following table sets forth our cash flows from our operating, investing and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014:
Six Months Ended June 30, |
||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
$ | 131 | $ | 177 | ||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities |
(341 | ) | (267 | ) | ||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities |
63 | (90 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net change in cash in period |
(147 | ) | (180 | ) | ||||
Cashopening balance |
583 | 517 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate on the cash |
| 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cashclosing balance |
$ | 436 | $ | 339 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by our operating activities are our primary source of liquidity and decreased by 26% to $131 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $177 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. This decrease was primarily driven by (1) a $62 million decrease in OPCs net cash flows from operating activities, primarily as a result of a lower generation component tariff, which serves as the base for the price calculation for the billing of OPCs customers, and (2) an $11 million decrease in CEPPs net cash flows from operating activities, mainly as a result of a decline in energy sales due to the expiration of its short-term PPA in September 2014.
These factors were partially offset by (1) a $10 million increase in Nejapas net cash flows from operating activities, primarily as a result of lower fuel payments in connection with a 44% decline in Nejapas average fuel prices, (2) a $6 million increase in Kallpas net cash flows from operating activities as a result of a decline in payments to employees in connection with a one-time payroll expense in 2014 and a decline in Kallpas income tax payments as a result of a lower outstanding income tax balance in the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to the outstanding balance in the previous year and (3) a $5 million increase in Inkias net cash flows from operating activities, primarily as a result of a decline in Inkias legal fees as a result of litigation relating to Crystal Power, which was settled in December 2014, and as a result of Inkias payment of a deferred compensation package and accrued stock appreciation rights during the six months ended June 30, 2014.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Cash flows used in our investing activities increased by 28% to $341 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 from $267 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, investing activities for which we used cash primarily consisted of (1) acquisitions of property, plant and equipment of $333 million, of which $173 million was used in the construction of Samay I, $114 million was used in the construction of CDAs plant, and $11 million was used in Kanans project installation and interconnection to Panamas power system and (2) payments of value added tax, net of project under construction, of $25 million. Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2015, we received proceeds of short-term deposits and restricted cash, net, in the aggregate amount of $24 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, investing activities for which we used cash primarily consisted of acquisitions of property, plant and equipment of $178 million, of which $92 million was used in the
105
construction of CDAs plant and $47 million was used in the construction of Samay I. Also, during the six months ended June 30, 2014, we made payments of short-term deposits and restricted cash, net, in the aggregate amount of $59 million and made payments of $35 million related to business combinations.
Cash Flows Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
Cash flows provided by our financing activities were $63 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $90 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014. This change was primarily driven by our repayment of $263 million of debt owed to IC, our former parent during May and June 2014.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we received aggregate proceeds of $187 million from our incurrence of long-term debt, including $85 million and $99 million borrowed under the CDA Finance Facility and the Samay I Finance Facility, respectively. Additionally, we paid $20 million in connection with the purchase of Crystal Powers shares in Nejapa Holdings Ltd., or Nejapa Holdings, and used cash to make payments of $52 million on our long-term debt and pay $48 million interest on borrowings.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, we received aggregate proceeds of $287 million from our incurrence/issuance of long-term debt, $18 million from our drawings of short-term loans, and $17 million from equity investments from certain of our partners, as follows:
| $117 million borrowed under the CDA Finance Facility; |
| $102 million borrowed under ICPIs credit facility; |
| $25 million from the issuance of CEPP bonds; |
| $23 million borrowed under Colmitos credit facility; |
| $21 million from the issuance of COBEE bonds; |
| $18 million from short-term loans (net of the payments made); and |
| $17 million from the investment by Energía del Pacífico in Samay I. |
Additionally, we used cash to distribute dividends of $6 million to our subsidiaries minority shareholders and used cash to make payments of $300 million to IC, our former parent, as follows:
| In May 2014, we repaid $168 million of intercompany debt owed to IC; |
| In June 2014, we repaid $95 million of capital notes owed to IC; and |
| In June 2014, we declared and distributed dividends of $37 million to IC. |
Net cash flows from financing activities in the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 also included our use of cash to make payments of $59 million on our long-term debt and to pay interest of $44 million on our borrowings.
106
Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013
The following table sets forth our cash flows from our operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
$ | 413 | $ | 272 | ||||
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities |
(378 | ) | (258 | ) | ||||
Cash flows provided by financing activities |
47 | 320 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net change in cash in period |
82 | 334 | ||||||
Cashopening balance |
517 | 184 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate on the cash |
(16 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cashclosing balance |
$ | 583 | $ | 517 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by our operating activities increased by 52% to $413 million for 2014 from $272 million for 2013. This increase was primarily driven by a $141 million increase in OPCs net cash flows from operating activities, reflecting a full year of commercial operations of OPC during 2014, as compared to approximately six months of commercial operations in 2013.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Cash outflows used in our investing activities increased by 47% to $378 million for 2014 from $258 million for 2013. This increase was primarily driven by (1) a $296 million increase in proceeds of short-term deposits and restricted cash, net, reflecting an aggregate amount of $221 million, (2) a $132 million change in our acquisition of property, plant and equipment (in particular, higher disbursements related to the development of CDAs plant during 2014, the beginning of construction of Samay I and Kanan, and the acquisitions of ICPNH, JPPC, Surpetroil and Puerto Quetzal) and (3) a $42 million increase resulting from business combinations. The effects of these expenditures were partially offset by $360 million of net proceeds received in connection with the sale of our indirect equity interest in Edegel in September 2014.
During 2014, investing activities for which we used cash primarily consisted of (1) acquisitions of property, plant and equipment of $426 million, of which $260 million was used in connection with the construction of CDAs plant and $85 million was used in connection with the construction of Samay I, (2) $221 million for short-term deposits and restricted cash, net in connection with the opening of time deposits related to the proceeds from Edegel sale and (3) $70 million (net of cash received) to complete the acquisitions of ICPNH, JPPC, Surpetroil and Puerto Quetzal. The effects of these expenditures were partially offset by $360 million of net proceeds received by us in connection with our sale of our indirect equity interest in Edegel in September 2014.
During 2013, investing activities for which we used cash primarily consisted of acquisitions of property, plant and equipment of $294 million, of which $185 million was used in connection with the construction of CDAs plant, $57 million was used to complete the construction of OPCs combined cycle plant, and $28 million was used to complete the acquisition of Colmito. The effects of these expenditures were partially offset by our receipt of proceeds in connection with the maturity of $74 million in time deposits.
Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash inflows provided by our financing activities decreased by 85% to $47 million for 2014 from $320 million for 2013. This change was primarily driven by our receipt of long-term loans, the issuance of debentures, the receipt of short-term credit from banks and the payments made to IC.
107
During 2014, we received aggregate proceeds of $667 million from our issuance of long-term debt and $20 million from equity investments from certain of our partners, as follows:
| $319 million borrowed under the CDA Finance Facility; |
| $153 million borrowed under the Samay I Finance Facility; |
| $102 million borrowed under ICPIs credit facility; |
| $43 million from the issuance of the COBEE bonds; |
| $25 million from the issuance of the CEPP bonds; |
| $23 million borrowed under Colmitos credit facility; |
| $2 million borrowed under Tipitapa Powers loan agreement; and |
| $20 million from the investment of Energía del Pacífico in Samay I. |
In addition, in 2014, we made payments of $300 million to IC, our former parent. In May 2014, we repaid $168 million of intercompany debt owed to IC. In June 2014, we repaid $95 million of capital notes owed to IC and declared and distributed dividends of $37 million to IC.
During 2013, we received aggregate proceeds of $323 million from our issuance of long-term debt, $125 million from short-term borrowings and $28 million from equity investments from certain of our partners, as follows:
| $143 million borrowed under the CDA Finance Facility; |
| $163 million from the issuance of the Inkia bonds; |
| $17 million borrowed under the OPC financing agreement; |
| $125 million borrowed under Inkias short-term credit facility; and |
| $28 million from the investment of Energía del Pacífico in CDA. |
Net cash flows from financing activities in 2014 and 2013 included the repayments of long-term loans and debentures of $111 million (excluding interest payments of $95 million) and $67 million (excluding interest payments of $60 million), respectively.
108
Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012
The following table sets forth our cash flows from our operating, investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||
Cash flows provided by operating activities |
$ | 272 | $ | 121 | ||||
Cash flows used in investing activities |
(258 | ) | (293 | ) | ||||
Cash flows provided by financing activities |
320 | 132 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net change in cash in period |
334 | (39 | ) | |||||
Cashopening balance |
184 | 221 | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate on the cash |
(1 | ) | 2 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cashclosing balance |
$ | 517 | $ | 184 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities
Cash flows provided by our operating activities increased by 124% to $272 million for 2013 from $121 million for 2012. This increase was primarily driven by: (1) a $28 million increase in OPCs net cash flows from operating activities, reflecting approximately six months of commercial operations of OPC during 2013, (2) a $86 million increase in Kallpas net cash flows from operating activities, primarily as a result of the increased sales of capacity and energy resulting from a full year of operations of the Kallpa facilitys combined cycle, and (3) a $14 million increase in dividends received from associates to $31 million in 2013, primarily as a result of Edegels operating performance, which resulted in an $11 million increase in dividends paid.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities
Cash outflows used in our investing activities decreased by 12% to $258 million for 2013 from $293 million for 2012.
Our investing activities during 2013 are set forth above.
During 2012, investing activities for which we used cash primarily consisted of acquisitions of property, plant and equipment of $371 million, of which $164 million was used in connection with the construction of CDA, $136 million was used in connection with the construction of OPCs combined cycle plant, and $46 million was used in the conversion of the Kallpa facility to combined-cycle operations. The effects of these capital expenditures were partially offset by our receipt of proceeds in connection with the maturity of $93 million of time deposits.
Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities
Net cash inflows provided by our financing activities increased by 142% to $320 million for 2013 from $132 million for 2012.
Our net cash inflows in 2013 are set forth above.
During 2012 we received aggregate proceeds of $201 million from our issuance of long-term debt and $48 million from equity investments from certain of our partners, as follows:
| $135 million borrowed under the OPC financing agreement; |
| $53 million borrowed under Kallpas syndicated loan; |
109
| $13 million from the issuance of bonds by COBEE; and |
| $48 million from the investment of Energía del Pacífico in CDA. |
Net cash flows from financing activities in 2013 and 2012 included the repayment of long-term loans and debentures of $67 million (excluding interest payments of $60 million) and $40 million (excluding interest payments of $37 million), respectively.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations and commercial commitments (including future interest payments) as of December 31, 2014, on a consolidated basis.
Payments Due by Period |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
Less than
|
One to Three
|
Three to Five
|
More than
|
||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Credit from banks and others |
$ | 59 | $ | 59 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Loans from banks and others, debentures, and lease agreements 1 |
3,308 | 264 | 801 | 559 | 1,685 | |||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
144 | 144 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other payables and credit balances |
90 | 90 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations 2 |
2,905 | 215 | 545 | 579 | 1,566 | |||||||||||||||
Operating and maintenance agreements 3 |
160 | 19 | 45 | 44 | 52 | |||||||||||||||
Obligations under EPC Contract Retirement 4 |
418 | 381 | 37 | | | |||||||||||||||
Cash payments under share appreciation rights plans 5 and retirement and severance obligations |
1 | 1 | | | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total contractual obligations and commitments |
$ | 7,085 | $ | 1,173 | $ | 1,428 | $ | 1,182 | $ | 3,303 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Consists of estimated future payments of principal, interest and premium on loans from banks and others, debentures, and lease agreements, calculated based on interest rates and foreign exchange rates applicable as of December 31, 2014 and assuming that all amortization payments and payments at maturity on loans from banks and others, debentures, and lease agreements, will be made on their scheduled payment dates. Also includes the interest rate swaps relating to these obligations, which are calculated based on the LIBOR interest rate set forth in the applicable interest rate swap contract plus the applicable fixed spread. |
2. | Consists of purchase commitments for natural gas and gas transportation pursuant to binding obligations which include all significant terms, including fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Based upon the applicable purchase prices as of December 31, 2014. |
3. | Consists of future payments to be made under services contract with Siemens based on its projections of the hours of service of Kallpas turbines. |
4. | Consists of future payments to be made under EPC contract, assuming that all progress and completion payments will be made on their scheduled payment dates. |
5. | Consists of payments to be made by OPC to settle share appreciation rights granted to certain senior executives of OPC pursuant to a share appreciation rights plan. As the exercise price of the share appreciation rights is based upon OPCs EBITDA during the four preceding fiscal quarters, the payments are based on OPCs EBITDA for 2014 and also assumes that all holders of these options will exercise them prior to the relevant expiration date. For further information on OPCs share appreciation rights plan, see Note 17(b) to our audited financial statements included in this prospectus. |
Additionally, in connection with CDAs entry into the CDA Finance Facility, we committed to make up to $44 million of additional equity contributions in CDA (which represents our proportionate interest of the $59 million of additional equity contributions requested by the lenders to CDAs shareholders). Our $44 million obligation is supported by a customary letter of credit. Any equity contributions made by us in CDA, including any equity contributions made pursuant to our settlement agreement with the EPC contractors, will result in a corresponding reduction in our $44 million contribution commitment. As a result of equity contributions made by us in CDA during 2015, this commitment is expected to decrease to $37 million.
110
Capital Expenditures
Assets in Advanced Stages of Construction
In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, we spent $299 million and $352 million, respectively, on capital expenditures relating to our assets in advanced stages of construction.
We anticipate that we will be required to spend approximately $414 million on capital expenditures relating to our assets in advanced stages of construction in 2015. We expect that we will meet our intended capital expenditures through a combination of cash generated from operating activities, cash generated by financing activities, including drawing down, or receiving disbursements from the CDA Finance Facility or the Samay I Finance Facility, new debt financings, the refinancing of any existing indebtedness as it becomes due, and the use of proceeds raised in connection with this offering.
Our assets in advanced stages of construction include:
| CDA, a run-of-the-river hydroelectric plant on the Mantaro River in central Peru, representing an expected 510 MW of capacity, has an estimated construction cost of $954 million. This project is being financed by the CDA Finance Facility, a $591 million syndicated credit facility, which was obtained in 2012, and equity contributions of $328 million, which contributions have already been made as of the date of this prospectus. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, CDA had invested $780 million, $633 million, $361 million and $194 million in its development, respectively. As of June 30, 2015, CDA had drawn $547 million under the CDA Finance Facility. |
As of September 30, 2015, construction of the CDA plant was approximately 85% completed, with 96% of the dams construction and 100% of the tunnels drilling completed, respectively. |
| Samay I, a cold-reserve open-cycle diesel and natural gas (dual-fired) thermoelectric plant in Mollendo, Arequipa (southern Peru), representing an expected 600 MW of capacity (when operated with diesel fuel), has an estimated construction cost of $380 million. This project is being financed by the Samay I Finance Facility, a $311 million seven-year syndicated secured loan agreement, which was obtained in December 2014, and equity contributions of $78 million, which contributions have already been made as of the date of this prospectus. As of June 30, 2015, December 31, 2014 and 2013, Samay I had invested $267 million, $101 million and $2 million in its development, respectively; Samay I did not invest any funds in its development in the year ended December 31, 2012. As of June 30, 2015, Samay I had drawn $252 million under the Samay I Finance Facility. |
As of September 30, 2015, Samay Is construction was approximately 91% completed. |
| Kanans thermal generation units, representing an expected 92 MW of capacity, have an estimated development cost of $73 million (including $40 million of intercompany costs related to Kanans acquisition of the barges from two of our subsidiaries). The capital required for this project will be sourced from a combination of cash generated from operating activities and cash generated by financing activities. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, Kanan has invested $61 million and $44 million in the development of the barges, respectively. |
As of September 30, 2015, Kanans development was 85% completed. |
111
Development Projects Completed During the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
In the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we spent $242 million and $359 million, respectively, on capital expenditures relating to the completion of our assets that were in advanced stages of construction, including:
| Kallpas combined cycle conversion, which converted Kallpas three natural-gas powered open-cycle generation turbines into combined cycle turbines with a 292 MW steam turbine. This project was financed by Kallpas $172 million bonds, $102 million syndicated loan, and $74 million raised from the sale of 25% of Kallpas shares to Energía del Pacífico. We completed the conversion of the Kallpa facility in August 2012 at a cost of $337 million. |
| OPCs construction of its 440 MW combined cycle plant in Israel. This project was financed by the OPC Financing Agreement, which represented NIS 1,800 million (approximately $460 million), as well as equity contributions of NIS 315 million (approximately $87 million) and NIS 79 million (approximately $22 million) from ICP and Dalkia Israel Ltd., which was OPCs other shareholder during this period, respectively. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, OPC had invested $508 million and $434 million in the development of this plant, respectively. |
We completed the construction of OPCs plant in July 2013 at a cost of $508 million.
Potential Projects
We are constantly monitoring and considering development and acquisition opportunities and are currently assessing 30 projects in Israel and various Latin American countries, such as in Chile, Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Panama, the Dominican Republic, and Nicaragua. These potential projects range in size from small-scale power facilities ( e.g. , less than 40 MW) to large-scale power facilities ( e.g. , approximately 550 MW) and utilize different fuels and technologies, including natural gas, hydroelectric, wind, and stranded gas. In some instances, we have acquired land, secured necessary licenses or rights, including temporary concessions and water rights, commissioned studies, made bids, or initiated similar actions, in connection with our assessment of the viability of the relevant project. We are also considering acquiring companies and assets in power generation and related businesses ( e.g. , transmission and distribution companies or assets).
In addition to the Latin American opportunities which are currently under our consideration, we also monitor opportunities in other markets. For example, in August 2015, we acquired 100% of the shares of AIE from Hadera Paper for NIS 60 million (approximately $16 million). AIE holds a provisional license for the construction of a 120 MW cogeneration power station in Israel and will seek regulatory approval for licenses in respect of an additional 25 MW. The project is in the advanced development stage, construction is expected to commence in early 2016, and the AIE plant is expected to reach its COD in the second half of 2018. Based upon our initial assessment, we expect that the total cost of completing the AIE plant (including the consideration for the acquisition of AIE) will be approximately $200 million.
There is no guarantee that we will proceed with any such projects. Ultimately, notwithstanding the number of opportunities that we may consider over the long- and short-terms, we will only pursue those projects that we believe will generate attractive, risk-adjusted returns over the long-term and which we believe we have the management capacity to build and operate. In addition, in some cases, we may not obtain the relevant approval to develop a project. Furthermore, in many cases, we will need to win tenders, obtain additional rights, permits, licenses, land purchases and water rights and may need to negotiate with counterparties, or conduct valuations and environmental studies, each of which could take years to satisfy, or may not be satisfied at all.
We expect to finance our development and acquisition activity through a combination of cash generated by financing activities, in particular, the entry into new debt financings, which are generally stand-alone, secured, project-specific, and with no or limited recourse, cash generated from operating activities, and the proceeds raised in this offering.
Material Indebtedness
As of June 30, 2015, our total outstanding consolidated indebtedness was $2,514 million, consisting of $158 million of short-term indebtedness, including the current portion of long-term indebtedness, and $2,356 million of long-term indebtedness. We had no outstanding loans or notes owed to Kenon as of June 30, 2015.
112
As of December 31, 2014, our total outstanding consolidated indebtedness was $2,348 million, consisting of $161 million of short-term indebtedness, including the current portion of long-term indebtedness, and $2,187 million of long-term indebtedness. We had no outstanding loans or notes owed to Kenon as of December 31, 2014.
Other than with respect to the OPC Financing Agreement and the ICPI mezzanine financing agreement, our outstanding consolidated indebtedness is primarily denominated in, or linked to, the U.S. Dollar.
The following table sets forth selected information regarding our principal outstanding short-term and long-term debt, as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
Outstanding
|
Outstanding Principal
|
Interest Rate |
Final maturity |
Amortization |
||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||
ICP: |
||||||||||||||
Hapoalim |
12.0 | 12.0 | | |
Bullet payment at final maturity |
|||||||||
Inkia: |
||||||||||||||
Inkia notes |
447.5 | 447.4 | 8.375% | April 2021 |
Bullet payment at final maturity |
|||||||||
OPC: |
||||||||||||||
Financing agreement 1 |
401.9 | 400.1 | 2 | 4.85% - 5.75% | July 2031 | Quarterly principal payments commencing in 2013maturity | ||||||||
IC Power Israel 3 : |
||||||||||||||
Tranche A |
41.8 | 39.9 | 4.85% - 7.75% | March 2017 | Bullet payment no later than final maturity | |||||||||
Tranche B |
57.3 | 53.2 | 7.75% | 2029 |
Annual principal payments 2017maturity |
|||||||||
Cerro del Águila: |
||||||||||||||
Tranche A |
315.9 | 257.0 |
LIBOR+4.25%
- 5.50% |
August 2024 |
33 quarterly principal payments commencing in August 2016 |
|||||||||
Tranche B |
170.0 | 138.4 |
LIBOR+4.25%
- 6.25% |
August 2024 |
Bullet payment at final maturity |
|||||||||
Tranche D1 |
39.0 | 31.8 |
LIBOR+2.7% -
3.60% |
August 2027 |
33 quarterly principal payments commencing in August 2016maturity |
|||||||||
Tranche D2 |
21.0 | 17.1 |
LIBOR+2.75%
- 3.60% |
August 2027 | 12 quarterly principal payments commencing in May 2024maturity | |||||||||
Samay I |
244.3 | 144.6 |
LIBOR+2.125%
- 2.625% |
December 2021 |
29% principal in 23 quarterly payments commencing in July 2016maturity
71% principal in bullet payment at final maturity |
|||||||||
Kallpa: |
||||||||||||||
Kallpa I lease |
6.9 | 11.2 | LIBOR+3.00% | March 2016 |
Monthly principal payments to maturity |
|||||||||
Kallpa II lease |
31.9 | 35.1 | LIBOR+2.05% | December 2017 | Monthly principal payments to maturity | |||||||||
Kallpa III lease |
41.3 | 44.9 | 7.57% | July 2018 | Monthly principal payments to maturity | |||||||||
Las Flores lease |
97.8 | 101.1 | 7.15% | October 2023 |
Quarterly principal payments to maturity |
|||||||||
Kallpa bonds |
154.2 | 159.3 | 8.50% | May 2022 |
Between 0.25 and 5.00% of principal payable on a quarterly basis commencing in May 2013maturity |
|||||||||
Kallpa syndicated loan |
65.6 | 72.6 | LIBOR+5.75% | October 2019 |
Monthly principal payments January 2013maturity |
|||||||||
COBEE: |
||||||||||||||
COBEE II bonds |
6.8 | 6.8 | 9.40% | September 2015 |
One-third bullet payments in September 2013, 2014 and 2015 |
|||||||||
COBEE III bonds 4 |
23.0 | 23.3 | 5 | Various | Various |
Four annual principal payments commencing in February 2017 |
113
Outstanding
|
Outstanding Principal
|
Interest Rate |
Final maturity |
Amortization |
||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||
COBEE IV bonds 6 |
42.2 | 42.4 | Various | Various |
Series A: bullet
payment at final maturity
Series B: 4
semi-
Series C: 8
semi-
|
|||||||||
CEPP: |
||||||||||||||
CEPP bonds |
24.8 | 24.8 | 6.00% |
January-March
2019 |
Bullet payment at
final maturity |
|||||||||
Central Cardones: |
||||||||||||||
Tranche 1 |
27.2 | 28.8 | LIBOR+1.90% | August 2021 |
24 semi-annual
principal payments to maturity |
|||||||||
Tranche 2 |
19.4 | 19.4 | LIBOR+2.75% | February 2017 |
Bullet payment at
final maturity |
|||||||||
Colmito: |
||||||||||||||
Banco Bice |
18.5 | 19.8 | 7.9% | December 2028 |
Semi-annual
principal payments to maturity |
|||||||||
JPPC: |
||||||||||||||
Royal Bank of Canada |
5.5 | 7.0 | LIBOR+5.5% | March 2017 |
Quarterly principal
payments to maturity |
|||||||||
Burmeister & Wain Scandinavian Contractor |
|
1.1 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
3.6% |
August 2018 |
Monthly principal
|
|||||
ICPNH: |
||||||||||||||
Amayo I |
48.9 | 51.7 | Various | October 2022 |
Quarterly principal
payments to maturity |
|||||||||
Amayo II |
34.4 | 37.0 | Various | November 2025 |
Quarterly principal
payments to maturity |
|||||||||
Tipitapa Power |
10.0 | 7.7 | 8.35% | November 2018 |
Quarterly principal
payments to maturity |
|||||||||
Corinto |
10.7 | 12.0 | 8.35% | December 2018 |
Quarterly principal
payments to maturity |
|||||||||
Puerto Quetzal: |
||||||||||||||
Banco Industrial |
17.4 | 21.8 | LIBOR+4.5% | September 2019 |
Quarterly principal
payments to maturity |
|||||||||
Surpetroil: |
||||||||||||||
Banco Corpbanca Colombia |
0.1 | 0.1 | 3.9% | November 2015 |
This facility has no
amortization schedule |
|||||||||
Surpetroil leases |
0.9 | 1.2 | Various | 2015-2017 |
Monthly principal
payments to maturity |
|||||||||
Veolia Energy Israel Ltd. Capital Note |
|
20.6 |
|
|
19.1 |
|
|
2016-2019 |
This capital note has
|
|||||
Short Term Loans from Banks |
53.8 | 58.1 | Various | 2015 |
These loans have no
amortization schedule |
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
2,513.6 | 2,347.9 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
1. | The consortium includes Bank Leumi Le-Israel B.M. and institutional entities from the following groups: Clal Insurance Company Ltd.; Amitim Senior Pension Funds; Phoenix Insurance Company Ltd.; and Harel Insurance Company Ltd. |
114
2. | Represents NIS 1,556 million converted into U.S. Dollars at the exchange rate for New Israeli Shekels into U.S. Dollars of NIS 3,889 to $1.00. All debt has been issued in Israeli currency (NIS) linked to CPI. |
3. | The mezzanine financing agreement also includes a Tranche C, pursuant to which up to NIS 350 million, at an interest rate of 11% per annum, may be drawn, subject to certain conditions, and only to cover shortfall amounts. No Tranche C debt was outstanding under this facility as of December 31, 2014. |
4. | Represents $3.5 million of 6.50% notes due 2017, $5.0 million of 6.75% notes due 2017, Bs.44.2 million ($6.3 million) of 9.00% notes due 2020, and Bs.42.9 million ($6.2 million) of 7.00% notes due 2022. |
5. | Includes Bs.44.2 million ($6.3 million), the aggregate principal amount outstanding of COBEEs 9.00% notes due 2020 as of December 31, 2014, and Bs.42.9 million ($6.2 million), the aggregate principal amount outstanding of COBEEs 7.00% notes due 2022, in each case converted into U.S. Dollars at the exchange rate for Bolivianos into U.S. Dollars of Bs.6.96 to $1.00 as reported by the Bolivian Central Bank ( Banco Central de Bolivia ) on December 31, 2014. Excludes premium of $2.3 million. |
6. | Represents $4.0 million of 6.0% notes due 2018, $4.0 million of 7.0% notes due 2020, Bs.84 million ($12.1 million) of 7.8% notes due 2024, $5.0 million of 6.70% notes due 2019 and Bs.105 million ($15.1 million) of 7.8% notes due 2024. |
Some of the debt instruments to which our operating companies are party require that Inkia, Kallpa, OPC, COBEE, CEPP and JPPC comply with financial covenants, semi-annually or quarterly. For further information, see Note 14 to our audited financial statements included in this prospectus. Under each of these debt instruments, the creditor has the right to accelerate the debt or restrict the company from declaring and paying dividends if, at the end of any applicable period the applicable entity is not in compliance with the defined financial covenants ratios.
The instruments governing a substantial portion of the indebtedness of our operating companies contain clauses that would prohibit these companies from paying dividends or making other distributions in the event that the relevant entity was in default on its obligations under the relevant instrument.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, substantially all of the assets of Kallpa, other than the Kallpa I, Kallpa II, Kallpa III and Las Flores turbines, which are under leasing agreements with financial institutions, are mortgaged or pledged as security for the financing agreements to which Kallpa is a party.
We have entered into hedging arrangements with respect to a portion of our long term debt, swapping variable interest for fixed rate interest. For further information on our hedging arrangements, see Note 29 to our audited financial statements included in this prospectus.
Inkia Notes
In April 2011, Inkia issued and sold $300 million aggregate principal amount of its 8.375% Senior Notes due 2021, which are listed on the Global Exchange Market of the Irish Stock Exchange. Interest on these notes is payable semi-annually in arrears in April and October of each year and these notes mature in April 2021. Inkia used the net proceeds of the sale of these notes to finance a portion of its equity contributions to CDA, to repurchase all of its secured indebtedness, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.
In September 2013, Inkia issued and sold $150 million aggregate principal amount of its 8.375% Senior Notes due 2021, which constituted additional notes under the indenture governing the 8.375% Senior Notes due 2021 issued in 2011. Inkia used the net proceeds of the sale of these notes to funds its projects under construction, both through greenfield projects and acquisitions, and for working capital and general corporate purposes.
In September 2014, Inkia received the requisite consents necessary to amend the indenture governing its 8.375% Senior Notes due 2021 in connection with (i) the contribution by Inkias former parent company, IC, of certain of its businesses and associated companies, including Inkia, to Kenon, thereby permitting the spin-off of Kenon from IC in January 2015 without requiring a change of control offer to be made to holders of the notes, and (ii) the sale by Inkia of all its equity interests in Acter Holdings, which indirectly held all of Inkias equity interest in Edegel, to Enersis S.A. and the repayment of certain indebtedness in connection therewith, which amended the asset sale covenant to require that Inkia apply the net proceeds received from such sale within 30 months of Inkias receipt of such net proceeds ( i.e. , prior to March 2017).
115
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under these notes was $450 million ($447 million net of transaction costs).
OPC Financing Agreement
In January 2011, OPC entered into a financing agreement with a consortium of lenders led by Bank Leumi LeIsrael Ltd., or Bank Leumi, for the financing of its power plant project. As part of the financing agreement, the lenders committed to provide OPC a long-term credit facility (including a facility for variances in the construction costs), a working capital facility, and a facility for financing the debt service, in the overall amount of NIS 1,800 million (approximately $460 million). As part of the financing agreement, certain restrictions were provided with respect to distributions of dividends and repayments of shareholders loans, commencing from the third year after the completion of OPCs power plant. The loans are CPI-linked and are repaid on a quarterly basis beginning in the fourth quarter of 2013 until 2031.
We have provided a guarantee to the lending consortium and hold cash collateral available for the benefit of the lending consortium. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the outstanding amount of the loan is NIS 1,515 million (approximately $402 million) and NIS 1,556 million (approximately $400 million), respectively.
ICPI Mezzanine Financing Agreement
In June 2014, we, through our subsidiary ICPI, entered into a mezzanine financing agreement for NIS 350 million to settle capital notes owed to IC. The agreement was entered into with Mivtachim the Workers Social Insurance Fund and Makefet Fund Pension and Provident Center. The loan is guaranteed with all of ICPIs assets (excluding the assets that are pledged to secure the senior debt as aforementioned) and the free cash flow deriving from OPC and is composed of three facilities: Facility A for NIS 150 million (approximately $42 million and $40 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively), Facility B for NIS 200 million (approximately $57 million and $53 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively), and Facility C (only to cover shortfall amounts) for NIS 350 million. All facilities are CPI-linked.
The principal of Facility A will accrue interest at a rate of (i) 4.85% per year until five business days after the end of the lock-up period under the OPC Financing Agreement and (ii) 7.75% per year thereafter until March 31, 2017. Facility As principal together with interest and any linkage differentials thereon will be repaid in full in one installment on the earlier of: (i) five business days following the issuance of OPCs financial statements for the fiscal year 2016; and (ii) March 31, 2017.
The principal of Facility B Loan will bear interest at a rate of 7.75% per year and accrue annually. Principal and any linkage differentials thereon shall be paid in consecutive equal annual installments until March 31, 2029, commencing on the earlier of: (i) the final maturity date of Facility A and (ii) the first anniversary after the end of OPCs lock-up period. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under these facilities was $99 million and $93 million, respectively.
CDA Finance Facility
In August 2012, CDA, as borrower, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as administrative agent, certain financial institutions, as lenders, and other parties thereto, entered into a senior secured syndicated credit facility in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $591 million to finance the construction of CDAs plant. Loans under this facility were disbursed in three tranches.
Tranche A loans under this facility, in an aggregate principal amount of up to $305 million, will initially bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 4.25% per annum, increasing over time beginning on the date after the interest payment date occurring after August 2017 to LIBOR plus 5.50% per annum. Principal of the Tranche A
116
loans will be payable in 33 quarterly installments commencing on the first quarterly payment date occurring after the project acceptance by CDA. Tranche A loans will be guaranteed by Corporación Financiera de Desarollo S.A., or COFIDE.
Tranche B loans under this facility, in an aggregate principal amount of up to $184 million, will initially bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 4.25% per annum, increasing over time beginning on the date after the interest payment date occurring after August 2017 to LIBOR plus 6.25% per annum. Principal of the Tranche B loans will be payable in August 2024. Tranche B loans will be will be guaranteed by COFIDE.
Tranche D loans under this facility, in an aggregate principal amount of up to $65 million, will initially bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum, increasing over time beginning on the date after the interest payment date occurring after August 2017 to LIBOR plus 3.60% per annum. Principal of the Tranche D loans will be payable in 45 quarterly installments commencing on the first quarterly payment date occurring after the project acceptance by CDA. Tranche D loans will be secured by a credit insurance policy provided by SACE S.p.A.Servizi Assicurativi del Commercio Estero, or SACE.
All loans under this facility are secured by:
| pledges of CDAs movable assets and offshore and onshore collateral accounts; |
| a pledge of 100% of the equity interests in CDA; |
| mortgages of the CDA plant and CDAs generation and transmission concessions; |
| a collateral assignment of insurances and reinsurances in respect of CDA; and |
| a conditional assignment of CDAs rights under certain contracts, including the CDA EPC contract and CDAs PPAs. |
The January 2015 consummation of the spin-off of Kenon from IC, our former parent, may have constituted a change of control under the CDA Finance Facility. However, in October 2014, the syndicate of lenders consented to the spin-off and, in connection therewith, CDA amended the credit facility to delete all references to, and obligations of, IC and to replace such references to, and obligations of, IC with references to, and obligations of, ICP. Additionally, the syndicate of lenders also approved the replacement of ICs guarantee under the credit facility with a guarantee from ICP, such that IC has been released from its obligations and all obligations thereunder were assumed by us. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under this facility was $547 million ($546 million net of transaction costs) and $462 million ($444 million net of transaction costs), respectively.
Samay I Finance Facility
In December 2014, Samay I entered into a $311 million, seven-year syndicated secured loan agreement with a syndicate including The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, as administrative agent, and certain financial institutions, as lenders, and other parties thereto, to build an open-cycle diesel and natural gas (dual-fired) thermoelectric plant in Mollendo, Arequipa (southern Peru), with an installed capacity of approximately 600 MW. The loan will initially bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 2.125% per annum, increasing to LIBOR plus 2.375% per annum beginning on the date after the interest payment date occurring at the end of 2017 and increasing further to LIBOR plus 2.625% per annum from the date after the interest payment date occurring at the end of 2020 through maturity; 29% of the total principal is payable in 23 quarterly payments commencing in July 2016; the other 71% of the total principal is payable at maturity. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under this facility was $252 million ($244 million net of transaction costs) and $153 million ($145 million net of transaction costs), respectively. Loans under this facility
117
are secured by pledges of Samay Is movable assets and onshore collateral accounts; a pledge over 100% of the equity interests in Samay I; mortgages of the Samay I real estate property, plant and generation and transmission concessions; collateral assignments of insurances and reinsurances in respect of Samay I; a conditional assignment of Samay I rights under certain contracts, including Samay Is EPC contract; and trust agreement over certain cash flows of Samay I.
Kallpa Leases
In March 2006, Kallpa entered into separate capital lease agreements with Citibank del Perú, Citileasing and Banco de Crédito del Perú, each amended in November 2006, December 2007 and July 2008, followed by a leaseback agreement with Citibank del Perú in April 2007, amended in December 2007 and July 2008, under which the lessors provided financing for the construction of the Kallpa I facility in an aggregate amount of $56 million. Under these lease agreements, Kallpa will make monthly payments to the lessors through the expiration of these leases in March 2016. Upon expiration of these leases, Kallpa has an option to purchase the property related to the Kallpa I plant for a nominal cost. These leases are secured by substantially all of the assets of Kallpa, including Kallpas sales under its PPAs.
In December 2007, Kallpa entered into a capital lease agreement with Banco de Crédito del Perú under which the lessor provided a total amount of approximately $82 million for the construction of the Kallpa II turbine. Under this lease agreement, Kallpa will make aggregate monthly payments to the lessors through the expiration of this lease in December 2017. Upon expiration of this lease, Kallpa has an option to purchase the property related to the Kallpa II plant for a nominal cost. This lease is secured by substantially all of the assets of Kallpa, including Kallpas sales under its PPAs.
In July 2008, Kallpa entered into a capital lease agreement with Scotiabank Perú under which the lessor provided financing for the construction of the Kallpa III turbine in an aggregate amount of $88 million. Under this lease agreement, Kallpa will make monthly payments to the lessors through the expiration of this lease in July 2018. Upon expiration of this lease, Kallpa has an option to purchase the property related to the Kallpa III plant for a nominal cost. This lease is secured by substantially all of the assets of Kallpa, including Kallpas sales under its PPAs.
In April 2014, Kallpa entered into a capital lease agreement with Banco de Crédito del Perú under which the lessor provided financing for the acquisition of Las Flores from Duke Energy Corp. in an aggregate amount of $108 million. Under this lease agreement, Kallpa will make quarterly payments to the lessors through the expiration of this lease in October 2023.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under these leases was $178 million and $192 million, respectively.
Kallpa Bonds
In November 2009, Kallpa issued $172 million aggregate principal amount of its 8.50% bonds due 2022. Holders of these bonds are required to make subscription payments under a defined payment schedule during the 21 months following the date of issue. Kallpa received proceeds of these bonds in the aggregate amount of $19 million, $36 million and $117 million in 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. The proceeds of these bonds were used for capital expenditures related to Kallpas conversion of its open-cycle turbines to a combined-cycle plant. Interest on these bonds is payable quarterly. Principal amortization payments under these bonds in amounts varying between 0.25% and 5.00% of the outstanding principal amount of these bonds commenced in May 2013 and will continue until maturity in May 2022. These bonds are secured by Kallpas combined-cycle plant and substantially all of Kallpas other assets, including Kallpas sales under its PPAs. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under these bonds was $154 million and $159 million, respectively.
118
Kallpa Syndicated Loan
In November 2009, Kallpa entered into a secured credit agreement with The Bank of Nova Scotia, Banco de Crédito del Perú and German Investment and Development Corporation (DEG) in the aggregate amount of $150 million to finance capital expenditures related to Kallpas combined-cycle plant. The loans under this credit agreement are secured by Kallpas combined-cycle plant and substantially all of Kallpas other assets, including Kallpas sales under its PPAs. The loans under this credit agreement bear interest payable monthly in arrears at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 5.50% per annum through November 2012, 5.75% per annum from November 2012 through November 2015 and 6.00% from November 2015 through maturity in October 2019. Scheduled amortizations of principal are payable monthly commencing in January 2013 through maturity in October 2019. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under these loans was $66 million and $73 million, respectively.
COBEE Bonds
COBEE II Bonds . In October 2008, COBEE issued and sold $25 million aggregate principal amount of its 9.40% notes due 2015. COBEE used the proceeds of this offering to refinance existing debt and for capital expenditures. Interest on these bonds is payable annually. Principal on these notes is payable in three equal annual installments commencing in September 2013. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the outstanding amount of these notes was $7 million.
COBEE III Bonds . In February 2010, COBEE approved a bond program under which COBEE is permitted to offer bonds in aggregate principal amount of up to $40 million in multiple series. In March 2010, COBEE issued and sold three series of notes in the aggregate principal amount of $14 million. The aggregate gross proceeds of these notes, which were issued at a premium, were $17 million. COBEE will amortize the premium of these notes over the respective terms of these notes, reducing the interest expense related to these notes. The Series A Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $4 million pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 5.00% per annum through maturity in February 2014. Principal on these notes is payable at maturity. The Series B Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $4 million, pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 6.50% per annum through maturity in February 2017. Principal on these notes will be paid in two equal annual installments commencing in February 2016. The Series C Notes, in the principal amount of Bs.44.2 million ($6 million), pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 9.00% per annum through maturity in January 2020. Principal on these notes will be paid in four equal annual installments commencing in February 2017.
In April 2012, COBEE issued and sold two additional series of notes in the aggregate principal amount of $11 million. The aggregate gross proceeds of these notes, which were issued at a premium, were $13 million. We will amortize the premium of these notes over the respective terms of these notes, reducing the interest expense related to these notes. The first series of these notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $5 million pays interest semi-annually at the rate of 6.75% per annum through maturity in March 2017. Principal on these notes is payable at maturity. The second series of these notes, in the aggregate principal amount of Bs.43 million ($6 million), pays interest semi-annually at the rate of 7% per annum through maturity in February 2022. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the outstanding amount of these notes was $23 million.
COBEE IV Bonds . In May 2013, COBEE approved a bond program under which COBEE is permitted to offer bonds in aggregate principal amount of up to $60 million in multiple series. In February 2014, COBEE issued and sold three series of notes in the aggregate principal amount of $20 million. The aggregate gross proceeds of these notes, which were issued at a premium, were $21 million. The Series A Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $4 million pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 6.0% per annum through maturity in January 2018. Principal on the Series A Notes is payable at maturity. The Series B Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $4 million pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 7.0% per annum through maturity in January 2020. Principal on the Series B Notes will be paid in four equal semi-annual installments commencing in
119
July 2018. The Series C Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of Bs. 84 million pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 7.8% per annum through maturity in January 2024. Principal on the Series C Notes will be paid in eight semi-annual installments commencing in July 2020.
In November 2014, COBEE issued and sold two series of notes in the aggregate principal amount of $20 million. The aggregate gross proceeds of these notes, which were issued at a premium, were $22 million. The first series of these notes, in the aggregate principal amount of $5 million, pays interest semi-annually at the rate of 6.70% per annum through maturity in October 2019. The second series of these notes in the aggregate principal amount of Bs.105 million (approximately $15 million), pays interest semi-annually at the rate of 7.80% per annum through maturity in October 2024. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the outstanding amount of these notes was $42 million.
CEPP Bonds
In December 2010, CEPP approved a program bond offering under which CEPP is permitted to offer bonds in aggregate principal amount of up to $25 million in multiple series. In 2011 and 2010, CEPP issued and sold $20 million and $5 million of its 7.75% bonds due in 2013 and 2014. CEPP used the proceeds of this offering to finance its continuing operations and repay intercompany debt. Interest on these bonds is payable monthly and principal of these bonds is due at maturity in May 2014. During the first quarter of 2014, CEPP issued and sold $25 million of its 6.00% bonds due in January 2019. Part of these funds were used to prepay $15 million of its 7.75% bonds outstanding due in May 2014. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under these bonds was $25 million.
Central Cardones
In connection with our acquisition of Central Cardones in December 2011, we consolidated the amounts outstanding under Central Cardones credit agreement entered with Banco de Crédito e Inversiones and Banco Itaú Chile. The loans under this credit agreement were issued in two tranches of $37 million and $21 million, respectively. Loans under the first tranche bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 1.9% per annum, and the principal of this tranche is payable in 24 semi-annual installments through maturity in August 2021. Loans under the second tranche bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum, interest is payable semi-annually, and the loan matures in February 2017. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under these loans was $47 million and $48 million, respectively.
Colmito
In January 2014, Colmito entered into a 12,579 million Chilean pesos (approximately $24 million) 14-year credit agreement with Banco Bice. The loan under this facility bears interest at a rate of 7.9% Chilean pesos per annum and is paid semi-annually through maturity in December 2028. Principal on this facility is payable semi-annually. In February 2014, Colmito entered into a cross-currency swap closing at a fixed interest rate of 6.025% in U.S. Dollars. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under this loan was 11,812 million Chilean pesos (approximately $18 million) and 12,135 million Chilean pesos (approximately $20 million), respectively.
JPPC
In March 2012, JPPC entered into a five-year $20.5 million syndicated loan agreement with RBC Royal Bank (Trinidad and Tobago) Limited, RBC Royal Bank (Jamaica) Limited and RBC Merchant Bank (Caribbean) Limited. The loan under this facility bears interest at a rate of LIBOR + 5.5% per annum and is payable in quarterly installments. Principal on this facility is payable in quarterly payments. JPPC entered into an interest rate swap contract to fix its interest at a rate of 6.46% per annum. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under this loan was $6 million and $7 million, respectively.
120
ICPNH
In October 2007, Amayo I entered into a 15-year $71.25 million loan agreement with Banco Centroamericano de Integración Económica, or CABEI. The term loan is secured by a first degree mortgage over all of the improvements executed on Amayo Is project site, cessation of all of the project contracts, and the creation and maintenance of a reserve account for $2.4 million, to be controlled by CABEI. The loans under this facility bear interest at a rate of 8.45% or LIBOR + 4.00% per annum and are payable in quarterly installments.
In November 2010, Amayo II entered into a 15-year $45 million syndicated loan agreement with Nederlandse Financierings-Maatschappij Voor Ontwikkelingslanden N.V. (FMO) and CABEI. The syndicated loan is secured by a first and second lien mortgage agreement, a first and second lien industrial pledge agreement, and a first and second lien contract pledge agreement. The loans under this facility bears interest at a rate of 10.76% (Mezzanine Loan), 8.53% (FMO Senior Loan) and a variable interest rate of LIBOR + 5.75% per annum and are payable in quarterly installments.
In November 2013 and November 2014, Tipitapa Power entered into a five-year $7.2 million loan agreement and a four-year $4.6 million loan agreement, respectively, with Banco de América Central, or BAC. The term loans are secured by a commercial lien, industrial lien and a mortgage on the property. The loans under this facility bear interest at a rate of 8.35% and are payable in quarterly installments.
In December 2013, Corinto entered into a five-year $14.5 million loan agreement with BAC. The term loan is secured by a commercial lien and a mortgage on the barge Margarita II. The loan under this facility bears interest at a rate of 8.35% and is payable in quarterly installments.
As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the aggregate principal amount outstanding under these loans was $104 million and $108 million, respectively.
Short-Term Loans
Our consolidated short term debt was $54 million and $58 million as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
Kallpa, CEPP, COBEE, Puerto Quetzal and Nejapa have entered into lines of credit with financial institutions in Peru, the Dominican Republic, Bolivia, Guatemala and El Salvador, respectively, pursuant to which they are permitted to borrow up to $60 million, $37 million, $13 million, $25 million and $29 million, respectively, expiring between 2015 and 2019, as applicable. Each of these lines of credit are used to finance their operating activities.
Trend Information
Fluctuations in Oil Prices and Currency Exchange Rates
As fuel is a significant cost for most of our operating companies, the prices of the various fuels utilized by our operating companies (e.g., gas, diesel, or HFO) have a significant effect on our results of operations. Many of our PPAs are denominated in the applicable local currency and contain an adjustment mechanism such that prices under our PPAs will be adjusted to reflect (among other things) changes in (i) the price of oil (by reference to oil price indices), (ii) the price of the underlying fuel, (iii) the relevant producer price index and/or (iv) changes in the local currency to U.S. Dollar exchange rate. In addition, for most of our gas and other fuel supply agreements, the price we pay is subject to adjustment based on changes in oil prices (by reference to oil price indices), the price of the underlying fuel, and currency exchange rates.
These adjustments under our PPAs and supply agreements are made on a periodic basis (e.g., monthly, quarterly or annually) and may also be subject to minimum deviation thresholds. Accordingly, although changes in oil, or other fuel, prices, inflation rates and foreign exchange rates can affect our revenues, there is generally not a corresponding effect on our margins.
121
However, these adjustments do not fully hedge our margins against changes in fuel prices and such other factors. In addition, we remain subject to variations in oil, or other fuel, prices, inflation and currency exchange rates in the short- to medium-term until such adjustments are made and to the extent of variations below the threshold. Further, while a significant portion of our sales are made pursuant to PPAs, we do make sales in the spot market and are subject to spot market prices (which are influenced by changes in oil, or other fuel, prices, inflation and exchange rates), and we are also subject to changes in market rates (which are influenced by fuel prices and inflation and exchange rates) when we renew our PPAs. A significant change (even where both fuel costs and PPAs are fully indexed) in the above mentioned factors can result in an increase or decrease in our margins. For the foregoing reasons, we expect that current trends in oil and other fuel prices and exchange rates will negatively affect our revenues and margins in the short- to medium-term.
Peru Power Market
As a result of the completion of various plants under construction in Peru (including CDA and Samay I, which are in the advanced stages of construction), we expect the generation capacity in Peru to increase at a faster rate than the demand for such electricity, resulting in an oversupply of capacity in the Peruvian market and a downward pressure on energy and capacity prices. Although a significant majority of our Peruvian energy and capacity is sold pursuant to PPAs, we also sell energy and capacity on the spot market in Peru and are therefore exposed to any declines in spot market rates to the extent we sell energy or capacity on the spot market. We also expect to enter into, and renegotiate, PPAs during this expected period of oversupply and downward pressure on energy prices, which may negatively impact the long-term rates we are able to negotiate with our customers and our revenues, margins or results of operations.
Israel Power Market
The price at which OPC purchases its natural gas from its sole natural gas supplier, the Tamar Group, is predominantly indexed (in excess of 70%) to changes in the PUAEs generation component tariff, pursuant to the price formula set forth in OPCs supply agreement with the Tamar Group. As a result, increases or decreases in this tariff have a related effect on OPCs cost of sales and margins. Additionally, the natural gas price formula in OPCs supply agreement is subject to a floor mechanism. PUAE generation component tariffs are lower in 2015 as compared to 2012-2014. Additionally, on September 8, 2015, the PUAE published a final decision, which became effective on September 13, 2015, and which further reduced the PUAE generation component tariff by approximately 12% from NIS 300.9 per MWh and NIS 301.5 per MWh to a single tariff of NIS 265.2 per MWh. As a result of previous declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, OPC will begin to pay the ultimate floor price in November 2015. Therefore, the recent September 2015 decline and any further declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, will not result in a corresponding decline in OPCs natural gas expenses, and will lead to a greater decline in OPCs margins. For further information on the risks associated with the indexation of the PUAEs generation tariff and its potential impact on OPCs business, financial condition and results of operations, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Government RegulationThe production and profitability of IPPs in Israel may be adversely affected by changes in Israels regulatory environment .
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
For quantitative and qualitative information on our market risk, see Note 29 to our audited financial statements included in this prospectus.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, Etc.
We did not have significant research and development expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We are not party to any off-balance sheet arrangements.
122
Industry Overview
We operate in power utility markets in Latin America, Israel and the Caribbean, each of which are governed by different degrees of regulation and regulatory systems (as further explained below) and provide varying degrees of incentives for private investment. These markets are typically characterized by relatively high rates of growth of GDP and lower overall and per capita energy consumption, as compared with more developed markets.
In the Latin American and Caribbean markets that we serve, the power utility market regulation generally allows for the sale and delivery of power from power generators (private or state-owned) to distribution companies (private or state-owned) and to non-regulated consumers. Israel, another market that we serve, has recently undergone significant structural changes. Until July 2013, when OPC commenced commercial operations as the first IPP in Israel, the IEC, a state-owned entity, operated as the sole large-scale provider of electricity in the country. Since then, other IPPs have begun operating in Israel and several other IPPs are expected to enter this market.
In the countries in which we operate, there is typically structural segregation between the companies involved in power generation and the companies involved in power transmission and distribution. In most of these countries, the government operates the power grid, and transmission services are provided on an open access basis ( i.e. the transmission company must transmit power through the grid, and in exchange, the transmission company charges a transmission rate set by the supervisory authority or resulting from a competitive process). In the markets where private and state-owned entities compete in the power generation sector, transmission and distribution services are conducted subject to exclusive franchises, effectively regulating the transmission and distribution operations.
Although operating permits are required in each of the countries in which we operate, the markets in these countries generally have no material regulatory barriers to entry. The financial resources required to enter these markets and the significant costs associated with the construction of power facilities, however, pose barriers to entry.
The following discussion sets forth a brief description of the key electricity markets in which we operate.
Peru
The power utility market in Peru is currently our primary market of operation and, driven by the growth in GDP and the expansion of energy coverage, Peruvian energy consumption has grown in recent years. According to the Peruvian National Institute of Statistics and Informatics ( Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática INEI ), Peru had a population of approximately 31 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the World Bank, Peruvian GDP grew by 2.4%, 5.8% and 6.0% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. An increase in domestic demand, resulting from growth in the overall economic activity of Peru, an increase in the populations income and consumption and an increase in investment in infrastructure, has also led to an increase in investments in value-added manufacturing processes to create products to serve the domestic market and for export. In addition, the availability and extraction of natural resources, in particular metals, has led to increased energy-intensive mining activity, which, according to MINEM, has supported the increase in Perus energy consumption from 29,492 GWh in 2010 to 37,252 GWh in 2014, representing a compound average growth rate of 6.0%. Nonetheless, the generation capacity in Peru is expected to increase at a faster rate than the demand for such electricity, resulting in an oversupply of capacity in the Peruvian market, which may result in downward pressure on negotiated and spot energy and capacity prices in Peru in the short- to medium-term.
123
The following chart presents a breakdown of installed capacity in Peru based on generation technology and fuel source, as of December 31, 2014:
Installed Capacity by Generation Technology
|
Installed Capacity by Fuel Source
|
|
|
|
The power utility market in Peru has experienced significant changes in the past 20 years, as a result of privatizations following structural reforms initiated in 1992. In that context, the Peruvian power industry underwent a structural reform characterized by: (1) the enactment of a new regulatory model under the Electricity Concessions Law ( Ley de Concesiones Eléctricas ), or Law 25844; (2) the restructuring and reorganization of the vertically integrated state owned power utilities into non vertically integrated generation, transmission and distribution companies; (3) the privatization of most of the restructured state owned utilities; (4) the promotion of private investment; (4) the regulation of the remuneration model for distribution and transmission activities based on cost-efficient standards; (5) the creation of an open access principle for the use of transmission and distribution networks; (6) the creation of a compensation system between generators that operates independently from contractual arrangements; and (7) the segmentation of power consumers as regulated and non-regulated, the latter being entitled to directly contract the supply of electricity from generators. From a regulatory perspective, the Peruvian system has split the regulatory roles among an independent regulator, OSINERGMIN, a policy body, the MINEM, and a market operator that is a private entity, COES. The structure and its separation have remained constant since the start of the reforms in 1992 and the economic model (i.e., marginal cost system) upon which the reform has been built is effectively embedded in the general electricity laws of Peru, providing long-term economic stability for investment.
The Law to Ensure Effective Development of Power Generation ( Ley para Asegurar el Desarrollo Eficiente de la Generación Eléctrica ), or Law 28832, and together with Law 25844, the General Electricity Laws of Peru, introduced further changes to the power utility market and strengthened the model, mainly aiming to: (1) maintain the economic principles used in Law 25844 and add new measures to facilitate competition in the wholesale market; (2) reduce government intervention in establishing power generation tariffs; (3) allow power generation tariffs for regulated power consumers to reflect a competitive market, facilitating the construction of new generation plants when required; and (4) ensure a sufficient supply of power by reducing the power systems exposure to the risks of high prices and rationing inherent to situations of undersupply of natural gas or transportation congestion. Law 28832 was approved as a consequence of a severe crisis in the Peruvian electricity market that resulted from, among other causes, OSINERGMIN defining the tariff at which distribution companies purchased electricity to supply to regulated customers at levels that did not reflect market conditions and were not attractive for generators to sell to distribution companies. The changes introduced by this law strengthened the model and incorporated mechanisms to effectively transfer risks from generators to end users that were not contemplated when the reforms were approved in 1992.
124
The reforms of 1992, together with the Peruvian Constitution of 1993, liberalized ownership across the Peruvian electricity sector and opened it to private investment, effectively eliminating any ownership restriction based upon nationality (except within 50 km of Perus international land borders, where certain restrictions apply) or otherwise. The privatization and concession award process was structured based upon the need to attract foreign investment and expertise that the country lacked. As a result of such ownership rules, the majority shareholders of almost all the private companies acting in the Peruvian electricity market are controlled by foreign investors. The second largest investors in the electricity sector are the Peruvian private pension funds administrated by the Private Pension Funds Administrators, or the AFPs.
Since 1992, the Peruvian market has been operating based upon a marginal generation cost system. As mentioned before, such system is embedded in the general electricity laws of Peru and is administrated by COES. In such capacity the COES has as its main mandate the satisfaction of all the demand for electricity at any given time (i.e., periods of 15 minutes each) with the most efficient generation assets available at such time, independently of contractual arrangements between generators and their clients. For this purpose, the COES determines which generation facilities will be in operation at any given time with an objective of minimizing the overall system energy cost. Energy units are dispatched (i.e., ordered by the COES to inject energy into the system) on a real-time basis; units with lower variable generation costs are dispatched first and then other less efficient generation units will be dispatched, until the electricity demand is satisfied.
The variable cost for the most expensive generation unit dispatched in each 15-minute time period determines the price of electricity in such time period for those generation companies that sell or buy power on the spot market price during such time period. The COES determines, for each such 15-minute period, the spot market at which such transactions among generators take place and acts as a clearinghouse of all such transactions.
Generation companies in the Peruvian electricity market sell their capacity and energy under PPAs or in the spot market. The principal consumers under PPAs are distribution companies and non-regulated consumers. Under regulations governing the Peruvian power sector, customers with a capacity demand above 2,500 kW participate in the unregulated power market and can enter into PPAs directly with generation companies at freely-negotiated prices. Customers with a capacity demand between 200 kW and 2,500 kW may choose to participate in the unregulated power market or contract as a regulated client with a distribution company. PPAs to sell capacity and energy to distribution companies for resale to regulated customers must be made at fixed prices based on public bids received by the distribution companies from generation companies or at the applicable bus bar tariff set by the OSINERGMIN. Generation companies are authorized to buy and sell capacity and energy in the spot market to cover their needs and their commitments under their PPAs. Customers that are entitled to participate in the unregulated power market must enter into PPAs with generation or distribution companies covering all their electricity demand as they are not allowed to purchase energy or capacity directly in the spot market.
For further information on Perus regulatory environment, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Peruvian Electricity Sector.
The following table sets forth a summary of energy sales in the Peruvian market for the periods presented:
Energy Sales |
||||||||
Under PPAs |
||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Distribution |
Unregulated |
||||||
(GWh) | ||||||||
2010 |
16,810 | 12,682 | ||||||
2011 |
17,888 | 13,904 | ||||||
2012 |
18,961 | 14,661 | ||||||
2013 |
19,880 | 15,841 | ||||||
2014 |
20,663 | 16,465 |
125
The demand for power and electricity in Peru is served by a variety of generation companies, including our subsidiary Kallpa, Edegel, a subsidiary of Enersis, ElectroPerú, a state-owned generation company whose primary generation facilities are hydroelectric plants, EnerSur S.A., a subsidiary of GDF Suez S.A., and Duke Energy Egenor S. en C. por A., a subsidiary of Duke Energy Corp.
The following table sets forth a summary of the principal generation companies in Peru, indicating their capacity by type of generation, as of December 31, 2014:
Capacity as of December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hydro |
Combined
|
Open-
|
Dual Fuel |
HFO |
Coal |
Other |
Total |
Percentage
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EnerSur |
137 | 814 | | 498 | 157 | 140 | | 1,746 | 20.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Edegel |
755 | 485 | 309 | 103 | | | | 1,652 | 18.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa IC Power |
| 870 | 193 | | | | | 1,063 | 12.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ElectroPerú |
886 | | | | 16 | | | 902 | 10.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Egenor |
359 | | 175 | | | | 16 | 550 | 6.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other generation companies |
1,021 | 561 | 464 | 193 | 139 | | 427 | 2,805 | 32.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
3,158 | 2,730 | 1,141 | 794 | 312 | 140 | 443 | 8,718 | 100.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Israel
According to the Israel Central Bureau of Statistics, Israel had a population of approximately 8 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the Israels Central Bureau of Statistics, Israeli GDP grew by 2.8%, 3.2% and 3.0% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Demand for electric power has increased in Israel in recent years due to, among other reasons, population growth, higher living standards and climate change.
Israels power generation units utilize fossil fuels almost exclusively. As of December 31, 2014, the installed capacity in Israel was approximately 15,637 MW, of which 9,349 MW is fueled by natural gas based upon information available from IECs financial report for 2014 and the PUAE.
The following charts present a breakdown of installed capacity in Israel based on fuel source as of December 31, 2014:
Installed Capacity by Fuel Source
Until July 2013, the state-owned IEC operated as the sole large-scale provider of electricity in Israel. However, PUAE incentives have encouraged private investments in the Israeli power generation market and OPC and other IPPs now operate in the market with significant capacity. For example, in May 2014, Dorad Energy Ltd. became the second IPP to commence commercial operations in Israel, adding capacity of 860 MW to the
126
Israeli power market. In July 2015, the first of two units of the power plant of Dalia Power Energies Ltd., or Dalia Power Energies, reached its COD. In September 2015, the second unit reached its COD, adding, together with the first unit, 910 MW to the Israeli power market. Several other IPPs are in the process of constructing power plants, and are expected to reach their COD in the coming years.
As of December 31, 2014, OPC had installed capacity of 440 MW, representing approximately 3% of Israels installed capacity and 22% of the installed capacity of IPPs (excluding self-generators), which had an aggregate installed capacity of approximately 2,020 MW as of December 31, 2014, according to IECs financial report for 2014.
Sales of IPPs are generally made on the basis of PPAs for the sale of energy to customers, with prices predominantly linked to the tariff issued by the PUAE and denominated in New Israeli Shekels. The PUAE operates a time of use tariff, which provides different energy rates for different seasons ( e.g. , summer and winter) and different periods of time during the day. Within Israel, the price of energy varies by season and demand period, with tariffs varying based upon the seasonsummer (July, August), winter (January, February, December) and transition (March-June, September-November)and demand (peak, shoulder and off-peak). Generally, the tariffs in the winter and summer seasons are higher than those in the transition season, making Israeli power generators, including OPC, more profitable, generally, in the winter and summer months, as compared to other months of the year.
The following tables set forth the tariffs and consumption blocks for each of the seasons set forth below, as of September 2015, which is the last month in which the PUAE has published final tariffs:
Regulated Generation Component Tariff |
||||||||||||
Winter |
Transition |
Summer |
||||||||||
(NIS per MWh) | ||||||||||||
Peak |
647 | 282 | 713 | |||||||||
Shoulder |
371 | 217 | 268 | |||||||||
Off-Peak |
195 | 166 | 165 | |||||||||
Weighted tariff |
265 |
Hours per Consumption Block 1 |
||||||||||||
Winter |
Transition |
Summer |
||||||||||
(Hours) | ||||||||||||
Peak |
404 | 2,002 | 308 | |||||||||
Shoulder |
208 | 906 | 308 | |||||||||
Off-Peak |
1,548 | 2,204 | 872 |
1. | The hours per consumption block may vary due to changes in the dates of weekdays, weekends and public holidays. |
For information on the risks associated with the indexation of OPCs revenues and cost of sales to the PUAEs generation component tariff and its potential impact on OPCs business, financial condition and results of operations, see Risk Factors Risks Related to Government Regulation The production and profitability of IPPs in Israel may be adversely affected by changes in Israels regulatory environment .
127
The following table sets forth a summary of energy sales in the Israeli market for the periods presented:
Energy Sales |
||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Distribution |
|||
(GWh) | ||||
2010 |
52,000 | |||
2011 |
53,100 | |||
2012 |
57,900 | |||
2013 |
56,900 | |||
2014 |
58,296 |
IEC has been classified by the Electricity Sector Law as an essential service provider and, as such, is subject to basic obligations concerning the proper management of the Israeli power utility market. These obligations include the filing of development plans, management of Israels power system, management of Israels power transmission and distribution systems, provision of backup and infrastructure services to IPPs and consumers, and the purchase of power from IPPs. The IEC also transmits and distributes all of the electricity in Israel.
For further information on Israels regulatory environment, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Israeli Electricity Sector. For information on the risks related to changes in Israels regulatory environment, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Government RegulationThe production and profitability of IPPs in Israel may be adversely affected by changes in Israels regulatory environment.
Nicaragua
According to the World Bank, Nicaragua had a population of approximately 6 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the International Monetary Fund, Nicaraguan GDP grew by an estimated 4.0% in 2014 and by 4.6% and 5.0% in 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Nicaraguas interconnected power system has an installed capacity of approximately 1,026 MW, consisting of thermal, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal and biomass power stations using HFO or diesel, which accounted for 58%, 18%, 11%, 8% and 5%, respectively, of Nicaraguas capacity as of December 31, 2014 according to CNDC. Nicaragua is also part of the SIEPAC, thereby permitting the creation of a Central American wholesale power generation market. For information on Nicaraguas regulatory environment, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Nicaraguan Electricity Sector.
The following table sets forth a summary of capacity and energy sales in the Nicaraguan market for the periods presented:
Capacity Sales | Energy Sales | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Under PPAs |
Spot Market |
Under PPAs |
Spot Market |
||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | |||||||||||||||
2010 |
661 | 112 | 3,086 | 237 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
702 | 112 | 3,353 | 130 | ||||||||||||
2012 |
728 | 72 | 3,536 | 91 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
740 | 72 | 3,695 | 133 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
749 | 72 | 3,933 | 140 |
Guatemala
According to the World Bank, Guatemala had a population of approximately 16 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the International Monetary Fund, Guatemalan GDP grew by 4.0%, 3.7% and 3% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
128
Guatemalas interconnected power system has an installed capacity of approximately 2,554 MW, consisting of hydro, diesel engines and other technologies, which accounted for 37%, 26%, and 37%, respectively, of Guatemalas capacity as of December 31, 2014 according to the Guatemalan electricity wholesale market administrator, or AMM ( Administrador del Mercado Mayorista ).
Guatemala, which is also a member of the SIEPAC, was a net exporter of energy in 2014.
All capacity sales in Guatemala are made pursuant to PPAs. The following table sets forth a summary of capacity and energy sales in the Guatemalan market for the periods presented:
Capacity Sales |
Energy Sales | |||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Under PPAs |
Under PPAs |
Spot Market |
|||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | |||||||||||
2010 |
1,468 | 6,984 | 1,138 | |||||||||
2011 |
1,491 | 7,286 | 1,019 | |||||||||
2012 |
1,533 | 7,500 | 1,056 | |||||||||
2013 |
1,564 | 7,394 | 1,785 | |||||||||
2014 |
1,635 | 8,223 | 1,899 |
El Salvador
According to the World Bank, El Salvador had a population of approximately 6 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the Consultants for Corporate Development ( Consultores para el Desarrollo Empresarial ), Salvadorian GDP grew by 1.8%, 1.7% and 1.9% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Hydroelectric plants accounted for 32% of El Salvadors capacity as of December 31, 2014 and geothermal plants accounted for 12%, based upon information available from the SIGET. The remaining 56% of El Salvadors capacity is provided by thermal plants powered by HFO, diesel and bio-mass.
Prior to August 2011, a market for capacity sales did not exist and consumers of electricity, including non-regulated consumers, purchased only energy. However, as a result of regulatory changes, and similar to generation companies operating in the Peruvian market, Salvadorian generation companies sell capacity and energy under PPAs or in the spot market. For further information on these reforms and El Salvadors regulatory environment, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Salvadorian Electricity Sector .
The following table sets forth a summary of capacity and energy sales in the Salvadorian market for the periods presented:
Capacity Sales | Energy Sales | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Under PPAs | Spot Market | Under PPAs | Spot Market | ||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | |||||||||||||||
2010 |
| | 1,745 | 3,892 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
555 | 404 | 2,745 | 3,011 | ||||||||||||
2012 |
655 | 332 | 3,122 | 2,761 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
715 | 285 | 3,823 | 2,177 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
764 | 271 | 4,176 | 1,891 |
Panama
According to the World Bank, Panama had a population of approximately 4 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the International Monetary Fund, Panamanian GDP grew by 6.2%, 8.4% and 10.8% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
129
Panamas interconnected power system had an installed capacity of approximately 2,704 MW, mainly consisting of hydro, thermal, and coal technologies, which accounted for 58%, 38%, and 4%, respectively, of Panamas capacity as of December 31, 2014 according to CND.
The following table sets forth a summary of capacity and energy sales in the Panamanian market for the periods presented:
Energy Sales | ||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Under PPAs |
Spot Market |
||||||
(GWh) | ||||||||
2010 |
6,868 | 1,442 | ||||||
2011 |
6,696 | 2,053 | ||||||
2012 |
7,217 | 1,884 | ||||||
2013 |
7,359 | 2,615 | ||||||
2014 |
7,542 | 3,193 |
An energy deficit has accumulated in Panamas generation market, and such deficit has recently increased as a result of an extended dry season, which led to increased electricity shortages. For example, in 2014, as an emergency measure, the Panamanian government called for an emergency bid to attempt to cover electricity shortfalls in the short-term. We submitted a bid in response to this request and, in October 2014, Kanan was awarded a five-year contract to supply energy in Panama in connection with the Panamanian governments effort. As a result of Panamas energy deficit, the Panamanian government may solicit additional bids in the future and we may submit a bid and further expand our operations in Panama in connection with such requests.
Bolivia
According to the World Bank, Bolivia had a population of approximately 11 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the International Monetary Fund, Bolivian GDP grew by 5.2%, 6.8% and 5.2% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Based upon information available from the CNDC, Bolivias national dispatch committee, as of December 31, 2014, thermal plants fueled by natural gas accounted for 69% of Bolivian capacity and hydroelectric plants accounted for 31%. As of December 31, 2014, thermal plants in Bolivia had capacity of 1,123 MW and hydroelectric plants in Bolivia had a capacity of 493 MW, according to the CNDC.
Following the nationalization of Guaracachi, Valle Hermoso and Corani in May 2010 by the Government of Bolivia, all of the generation companies currently developing power projects in Bolivia are government-owned entities. It is unclear whether the Government of Bolivia will continue nationalizing entities involved in its power utility market and it is unclear whether such nationalization (if any) would be adequately compensated for by the Bolivian Government. For further information on the Bolivian Governments acts of nationalization, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Government RegulationThe Government of Bolivia has nationalized energy industry assets, and our remaining operations in Bolivia may also be nationalized .
In December 2011, the Bolivian government amended the applicable law to prohibit generation companies from entering into new PPAs. For further information on risks related to our inability to renew, enter into, or replace long-term PPAs, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our BusinessWe may not be able to enter into, or renew existing, long-term contracts for the sale of energy and capacity, contracts which reduce volatility in its results of operations. For further information on Bolivias regulatory environment, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Bolivian Electricity Sector.
130
Bolivian generation companies sell capacity and energy under PPAs or in the spot market. The following table sets forth a summary of capacity and energy sales in the Bolivian market for the periods presented:
Capacity Sales |
Energy Sales |
|||||||||||||||
Under PPAs |
|
Under PPAs |
|
|||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Unregulated |
Spot Market |
Unregulated |
Spot Market |
||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | |||||||||||||||
2010 |
50 | 959 | 382 | 5,432 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
47 | 1,005 | 368 | 5,934 | ||||||||||||
2012 |
43 | 1,060 | 369 | 6,236 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
47 | 1,119 | 368 | 6,645 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
44 | 1,254 | 357 | 7,121 |
In Bolivia, wages are periodically increased by governmental decree and, as a result, labor costs, which already represent a significant portion of the operating expenses of Bolivian generation and distribution companies, are expected to continue to increase and represent a greater portion of generation expenses.
Chile
According to the World Bank, Chile had a population of approximately 18 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the Central Bank of Chile ( Banco Central de Chile ), Chilean GDP grew by 1.8%, 4.3% and 5.5% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Two of Chiles four power systems represent a significant portion of its 20,291 MW electricity market. The largest of such systems is the Central Interconnected System, or the SIC, which has a capacity of 15,181 MW, primarily consisting of coal-based power stations, hydroelectric stations, dual-fueled power stations using liquid natural gas or diesel and wind farms and solar power stations which accounted for 53%, 42%, 4% and 1%, respectively, of the SICs capacity as of December 31, 2014. The SIC serves approximately 92% of the Chilean population. The other power system is the SING, which has a capacity of 4,970 MW and serves approximately 6% of the Chilean population.
In 1982, Chile became the first country in the region to adopt the marginal generation cost system. Chile still uses the marginal generation cost system to ensure demand for power is met at the minimum system cost. For further information on Chiles regulatory environment, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Chilean Electricity Sector.
The following table sets forth a summary of capacity and energy sales in the SIC for the periods presented:
Capacity Sales | Energy Sales | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Under PPAs |
Spot Market |
Under PPAs |
Spot Market |
||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | |||||||||||||||
2010 |
4,639 | 941 | 35,939 | 5,123 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
4,663 | 1,205 | 38,364 | 5,440 | ||||||||||||
2012 |
4,754 | 1,438 | 36,966 | 9,315 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
5,351 | 1,334 | 41,147 | 6,630 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
5,832 | 1,248 | 44,234 | 8,032 |
Dominican Republic
According to the Dominican Republics National Statistics Office ( Oficina Nacional de Estadística ), the Dominican Republic had a population of approximately 10 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the Dominican Central Bank ( Banco Central de la República Dominicana ), the Dominican Republics GDP grew by 7.3%, 4.8% and 2.6% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively; the significant growth in 2014 primarily resulted from the decline in international fuel prices.
131
Based upon information available from the Coordinating Body ( Organismo Coordinador ), or OC, as of December 31, 2014, HFO plants accounted for 47% of the Dominican capacity and hydroelectric plants accounted for 16%. The remainder of Dominican capacity is provided by open-cycle and combined-cycle plants fueled by natural gas, and thermal plants fueled by coal. As of December 31, 2014, thermal plants in the Dominican Republic had a capacity of 3,065 MW and hydroelectric plants in the Dominican Republic had a capacity of 592 MW, according to the OC.
The large-scale theft of power from the grid is prevalent in the Dominican Republic. Since generation and distribution companies do not pass through the cost associated with such theft to consumers, the government must provide significant subsidies to these companies. For information on the Dominican Republics regulatory environment, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Dominican Republic Electricity Sector .
Dominican generation companies sell capacity and energy under PPAs or in the spot market. The following table sets forth a summary of capacity and energy sales in the Dominican market for the periods presented:
Capacity Sales | Energy Sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Under PPAs | Under PPAs | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Distribution |
Other
|
Spot
|
Distribution |
Other
|
Spot
|
||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 |
1,366 | 115 | 337 | 10,165 | 1,026 | 926 | ||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
1,377 | 111 | 529 | 9,877 | 1,107 | 2,615 | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
1,429 | 238 | 634 | 11,084 | 1,792 | 2,657 | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
1,676 | 212 | 569 | 10,929 | 2,164 | 3,114 | ||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
1,453 | 163 | 822 | 10,045 | 1,389 | 4,109 |
Jamaica
According to the World Bank, Jamaica had a population of approximately 3 million in 2014. According to the Statistical Institute of Jamaica, Jamaican GDP decreased by 0.5%, and grew by 0.2% and 0.5% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively Jamaicas interconnected power system has an installed capacity of approximately 938 MW, consisting of thermal, hydro and other technologies, which accounted for 93%, 3%, and 4%, respectively, of Jamaicas capacity as of December 31, 2014 according to the Jamaica Productivity Centre.
Unlike the other Latin American and Caribbean countries in which we operate, or may operate in the future, Jamaica does not employ a marginal cost regulatory framework. As a result, the relevant regulatory agencies do not determine which generation unites are to be dispatched, so as to minimize the cost of energy supplied. All capacity and energy sales in the Jamaican market are made pursuant to PPAs. The following table sets forth a summary of capacity and energy sales in the Jamaican market for the periods presented:
Capacity Sales | Energy Sales | |||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Under PPAs |
Under PPAs |
||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | |||||||
2010 |
789 | 4,137 | ||||||
2011 |
789 | 4,137 | ||||||
2012 |
854 | 4,135 | ||||||
2013 |
854 | 4,142 | ||||||
2014 |
938 | 4,107 |
132
Colombia
According to the World Bank, Colombia had a population of approximately 49 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the Colombian National Administrative Department of Statistics, Colombias GDP grew by 4.6%, 4.9% and 4% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Colombias interconnected power system has an installed capacity of approximately 15,555 MW, consisting of hydro, thermal plants, minor plants and cogenerators, which accounted for 70%, 29%, 0.5% and 0.5%, respectively, of Colombias capacity as of December 31, 2014 according to UPME. For information on Colombias regulatory environment, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Colombia Electricity Sector.
The following table sets forth a summary of energy sales and consumption in the Colombian market for the periods presented:
Energy Sales | Energy Consumption | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Under PPAs |
Spot Market |
Regulated |
Unregulated |
||||||||||||
(GWh) | (GWh) | |||||||||||||||
2010 |
63,555 | 18,251 | 37,821 | 18,002 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
62,179 | 16,787 | 38,231 | 18,536 | ||||||||||||
2012 |
67,183 | 17,016 | 39,175 | 19,800 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
71,375 | 14,948 | 40,282 | 20,237 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
69,846 | 15,544 | 42,323 | 20,867 |
Other Potential Markets
The following discussion sets forth a brief description of the electricity market in Mexico, which we have identified as a potential country in which we may expand our operations in the near- to medium-term.
Mexico
According to the World Bank, Mexico had a population of approximately 124 million as of December 31, 2014. According to the World Development Indicators, Mexican GDP increased by 2.1%, 1.4% and 4.0% in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.
Mexicos interconnected power system has an installed capacity of approximately 64,456 MW, as of December 31, 2013, of which the public sector accounted for 54,035 MW, or 84% of Mexicos installed capacity. Thermal, hydroelectric, nuclear and other plants accounted for 73%, 21%, 3% and 3%, respectively, of Mexicos public sector installed capacity as of December 31, 2013.
In 2014, Mexico undertook certain reforms of its electricity market in an effort to drive significant investments in new generation capacity. As an example, in 2015, the Federal Electricity Commission ( Comisión Federal de Electricidad ), or the CFE, expects to grant concessions to construct approximately 7.0 GW of additional generation capacity, of which 3.2 GW are expected to be awarded to IPPs. In addition, Petróleos Mexicanos, or PEMEX, has announced that it aims to reach an installed capacity of approximately 3.1 GW in the medium-term by partnering with power companies for the development of cogeneration plants. The Mexican government has also announced initiatives towards the development of significant renewable energy capacity, targeting the addition of approximately 4.6 GW of wind capacity over the next decade.
133
The following table sets forth a summary of effective capacity and energy consumption in the Mexican market for the periods presented:
Effective Capacity | Energy Consumption | |||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
Total Public System |
IPPs |
Internal Sales |
Self-Supply |
||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | |||||||||||||||
2010 |
52,945 | 11,907 | 186,639 | 26,155 | ||||||||||||
2011 |
52,512 | 11,907 | 200,946 | 27,092 | ||||||||||||
2012 |
53,114 | 12,418 | 206,480 | 26,257 | ||||||||||||
2013 |
54,035 | 12,851 | 206,130 | 29,039 | ||||||||||||
2014 |
54,367 | 12,851 | 208,015 | 37,441 |
134
We are a leading owner, developer and operator of power facilities located in key power generation markets in Latin America, the Caribbean and Israel, utilizing a range of fuels, including natural gas, hydroelectric, HFO, diesel and wind. Currently, our principal focus is on Latin American markets, which typically have higher rates of growth of GDP and lower overall and per capita energy consumption, as compared with more developed markets. We believe that economic growth in Latin American markets will drive increases in overall and per capita energy consumption and therefore require significant additional investments in power generation assets in those markets.
As of June 30, 2015, our installed capacity and our proportionate capacity were 2,642 MW and 2,149 MW, respectively. We expect to increase our installed capacity by 1,202 MW, or 45%, to 3,844 MW (3,074 MW on a proportionate basis) by the middle of 2016, upon the completion of the following assets in advanced stages of construction:
| Cerro del Aguila S.A.s, or CDAs, 510 MW hydroelectric project located in Peru, which we expect to be completed by the middle of 2016; |
| Samay I S.A.s, or Samay Is, 600 MW cold-reserve thermoelectric project located in Peru, which we expect to be completed by the middle of 2016; and |
| Kanan Overseas, I. Inc.s, or Kanans, 92 MW thermal generation project in Panama, which we expect to be completed by the end of 2015. |
Between 2007 and June 30, 2015, we invested approximately $2.5 billion in the acquisition, development and expansion of our power generation assets. Of this amount, 87% represented investments in greenfield development (including investments made in those assets in advanced stages of construction) and 13% represented acquisitions. We have financed our greenfield development using a combination of cash on hand, debt financing and investments by minority shareholders at the asset level, and have financed our acquisitions using cash on hand. Of the 2,093 MW we have added to our installed capacity since Inkias formation, 63% derived from greenfield development projects, consisting of our construction of the Kallpa combined cycle plant, which comprises Perus largest power generation facility, and the construction of OPCs plant, which became Israels first IPP. In the same period, we have acquired businesses with an aggregate installed capacity of 783 MW in five countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. By the middle of 2016, we will have derived 76% of our installed capacity growth since 2007 from our greenfield development efforts (based upon our current portfolio and assuming the completion of our assets in advanced stages of construction).
By successfully pursuing growth opportunities, primarily through contracted greenfield development projects in existing markets and acquisitions of anchor investments in new markets, we have expanded our regional presence, diversified our portfolio through the addition of various facilities which use a range of fuels, and significantly increased our cash flows. In 2014, our Adjusted EBITDA was $395 million, as compared to $41 million in 2008, representing a CAGR of 46% during this period. Adjusted EBITDA is a non-IFRS measure. For a reconciliation of our net income to our Adjusted EBITDA, see Summary Consolidated Financial and Other InformationKey Financial and Other Operating Information .
We were incorporated in Singapore in May 2015 under the name IC Power Pte. Ltd., pursuant to the Singapore Companies Act. Until the completion of this offering, we will remain a wholly-owned subsidiary of Kenon (NYSE: KEN; TASE: KEN), which was formed by IC in 2014 to serve as the holding company of certain interests, including ICP, received by Kenon in connection with ICs January 2015 spin-off of Kenon to ICs shareholders. In addition to its interest in us, Kenon also holds interests in Qoros Automotive Co., Ltd., ZIM Integrated Shipping Ltd. and Primus Green Energy, Inc. ICP and its businesses shall be contributed to us by our parent, Kenon, prior to the completion of this offering, through a Reorganization described in further detail in
135
Corporate Formation and Reorganization . Set forth below is a description of the operations of ICP and its businesses. Except as otherwise indicated, or unless the context requires otherwise, references to the Company, we, us and our shall refer to ICP and its businesses prior to the Reorganization.
ICP operates through various operating companies in which, with the exception of Pedregal, it holds controlling interests as set forth in the following graphic (the percentage of holdings stated alongside each operating company are, in some cases, indirect holdings):
136
The following table sets forth summary operational information regarding each of our operating companies as of June 30, 2015 by segment:
1. | Reflects 100% of the capacity of each of our assets, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
2. | Reflects the proportionate capacity of each of our assets, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
3. | Reflects energy sales under PPAs for the 12 months ended June 30, 2015. |
4. | Kallpas plants were developed as greenfield projects in four different stages between 2005 and 2012, resulting in 870 MW of installed capacity. In addition, Kallpa acquired Las Flores power plant in 2014, adding 193 MW to Kallpas capacity. |
5. | Reflects the weighted average remaining life of OPCs PPAs with end users based on OPCs firm capacity. The IEC PPA, which extends for an 18-year term and covers OPCs entire firm capacity, provides OPC with the option to allocate and sell the generated electricity of the power station directly to end users. OPC has exercised this option and sells all of its energy and capacity directly to 23 end users, as of June 30, 2015 (22 end users as of December 31, 2014). For further information on the IEC PPA, see BusinessRegulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Israeli Electricity Sector. |
6. | Although Pedregal is located in Central America, it is a minority investment. Therefore, from an income statement perspective, it is not part of the Central America segment and Pedregal is only reflected in our share in income of associated companies. |
7. | Although we have a non-controlling interest in Pedregal, we are party to a management services agreement, which designates us as the administrator responsible for the day-to-day management of Pedregal. |
137
The following table sets forth summary operational information regarding each of our assets in advanced stages of construction:
1. | Reflects 100% of the expected capacity of each asset, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns the asset. |
2. | Reflects the proportionate capacity of each of our assets, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
3. | When fueled by natural gas, the Samay I plant will have an installed capacity of approximately 720 MW. |
4. | Includes $40 million of intercompany expenses relating to Puerto Quetzals and CEPPs sale of the barges to Kanan. |
Competitive Strengths
Strong track record in disciplined project development and obtaining financing We leverage our core competenciesproject identification, evaluation, development, construction and operationto develop power generation facilities using various technologies in attractive markets that typically have relatively high GDP growth rates and relatively low levels of per capita energy consumption. For example, in 2012, we completed our third expansion of Kallpas gas-powered plant, which is the largest power generation facility in Peru in terms of capacity, by converting it into a combined cycle facility and thereby adding 292 additional MW to the facilitys capacity. This expansion was completed on time and below budget. Additionally, in 2013, OPC became the first IPP in Israel when we completed the construction of its 440 MW combined cycle power plant.
Our projects have been developed with a disciplined capital structure, which reflects our commitment to develop projects in accordance with three key fundamental principles. First, we endeavor to construct projects by entering into turnkey EPC agreements that define the total project cost and transfer most of the risks of construction delays and cost overruns to our EPC contractors. We currently have assets in advanced stages of construction with an expected aggregate installed capacity of 1,202 MW, 1,110 MW of which is being constructed pursuant to EPC contracts. Second, we seek to secure a revenue stream prior to the construction of our plants by sourcing and entering into long-term PPAs, which provide our development projects with verifiable projected margins and cash flows, before construction has commenced. Finally, we leverage our EPC contracts and PPAs to secure long-term project financing agreements which are generally stand-alone, secured, project-specific, and with no or limited recourse. Over the course of our history, we have secured different types of financings ( e.g. , leases, local and international bonds, syndicated loans, etc.) during times of changing financial markets and in connection with our construction of various projects using a range of fuels.
Long-term PPAs and supply agreements that limit exposure to market fluctuations Our operating subsidiaries typically enter into long-term PPAs, which generally limits their exposure to fluctuations in energy spot market rates, generates stable and predictable margins, and helps to create stability and predictability in our cash flows. In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, we made 88% and 92%, respectively, of our aggregate energy sales (in GWh) pursuant to long-term PPAs. As of June 30, 2015, the weighted average remaining life of our PPAs was 10 years (including the remaining life of the PPAs for our assets in advanced stages of construction) and we have historically sought, and will continue to seek, to renew our long-term PPAs as they expire.
138
As of June 30, 2015, the majority of our PPAs were indexed to the price of the corresponding power plants operating fuel prices in U.S. Dollars. Additionally, as of June 30, 2015, many of our PPAs provided for payment in, or were linked to, the U.S. Dollar, thereby limiting our exposure to fuel price and exchange rate fluctuations. Additionally, the counterparties to our long-term PPAs are typically large local distribution companies or non-regulated customers, including subsidiaries of large multi-national corporations, which we believe have strong credit profiles, mitigating the risk of customer default. Some of our major customers within Peru and Israel include Southern Peru Copper Corporation, Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A., a subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan, Compañía Minera Antapaccay S.A., a subsidiary of Glencore Xstrata, and Oil Refineries Limited, as well as governments and quasi-governmental entities.
As our power facilities utilize and are dependent upon natural gas, hydroelectric, HFO, diesel, wind, or a combination of these energy sources, we seek to enter into long-term supply and transportation agreements to acquire the necessary fuel for our facilities. For example, Kallpa and OPC, which own and operate our largest plants, are party to long-term supply agreements, including natural gas supply agreements and transportation services agreements, that are material to their operations.
Attractive footprint in high growth markets Currently, our principal focus is on Latin American markets, which typically have higher rates of growth of GDP and lower overall and per capita energy consumption, as compared with more developed markets. We expect continued growth in these key markets, providing us with the opportunity to generate attractive, risk-adjusted returns through additional investments in power generation assets in those countries.
We are a leader in our largest market, Peru, one of the fastest growing economies in Latin America, with an average GDP growth of approximately 5.8% per year from 2009 through 2014, according to the International Monetary Fund, a mature regulatory framework, and a well-run power system. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, our operating company in Peru had an installed capacity of 1,063 MW, representing 12.2% of Perus installed capacity, and generated 14.2% of the gross energy generated (in GWh) in Peru. Our operating company in Peru represented 45% of our Adjusted EBITDA, 51% of our net income, and 40% of our installed capacity as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015. Additionally, our assets in advanced stages of construction in Peru are expected to provide an additional 1,110 MW in installed capacity to address the expected increase in Peruvian energy demand, which is expected to result, in part, from the substantial investments made in connection with Perus energy-intensive mining industry and expected growth in its manufacturing industry.
We also operate OPC, the first IPP in Israel, which, following decades of state control, recently opened its electricity market to private power producers. As a result, the electricity market in Israel is still in the early stages of development. Furthermore, Israels energy consumption levels have increased in recent years and are expected to continue to increase in the near-term. As of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, OPC had an installed capacity of 440 MW, representing approximately 3% of Israels installed capacity and 22% of the installed capacity of IPPs, and generated 6.9% of the gross energy generated (in GWh) in Israel. As of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015, OPC represented 25% of our Adjusted EBITDA, 30% of our net income, and 17% of our installed capacity. We believe that OPCs plant provides us with a strategic advantage as an early entrant in the Israeli electricity market. Additionally, given Israels growing economy and the advanced age of its existing state-owned power generation facilities, we believe OPC provides us with the know-how, visibility of, and opportunity to participate in, additional power projects in Israel, which opportunities may become increasingly available to private sector participants such as ourselves.
In addition to our attractive position in Peru and Israel, we have also developed an attractive footprint in several markets in Latin America, including Chile and Colombia. We believe that our current platform, coupled with our agile and disciplined decision-making process, enables us to take advantage of opportunities as they arise.
139
Established and disciplined track record in making acquisitions We have acquired numerous generation assets since 2007, resulting in the expansion of our operations by 783 MW (641 MW on a proportionate basis) in five countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. We believe our recognition as a regional generator and developer with a relatively strong balance sheet, and our ability to act quickly with respect to acquisitions, has complemented our development capabilities by allowing us to strategically source and execute acquisitions. Furthermore, we have the ability to manage projects that are too small for large companies, as well as projects that are too large for small companies. Our acquisition of Central Cardones in 2011, for example, provided us with an initial footprint in Chile, a dynamic and important power market, and facilitated our acquisition of Colmito in October 2013. Similarly, our acquisition of certain Nicaraguan assets in 2014, representing 185 MW of installed capacity (117 MW on a proportionate basis) provided us with an entry into the Nicaraguan market and diversified our portfolio with operational wind generation assets. Additionally, in August 2015, we acquired 100% of the shares of AIE, which holds a provisional license for the construction of a 120 MW cogeneration power station, and will seek regulatory approval for licenses in respect of an additional 25 MW, in Israel, a new and growing private electricity generation market.
Driving operational excellence through partnerships with leading OEMs and reliance on efficient technologies We seek to optimize our power generation capacity by using leading technologies ( e.g. , turbines manufactured by Siemens, General Electric, Mitsubishi and Andritz) and entering into long-term service agreements with leading, multi-national original OEMs. Our technologies and long-term partnerships enable our power generation assets to perform more efficiently and at relatively high levels of reliability. Additionally, our experienced staff is committed to increasing our operating performance and ensuring the disciplined maintenance of our power generation assets. We believe that our generation plants weighted average availability rate of 94% for both the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 was the result of our optimization efforts and commitment to improving our operating efficiency and performance.
Additionally, our acquisition or construction of power generation assets that use efficient technologies ( e.g ., the conversion of Kallpas facility into a combined cycle operation in 2012) places our generation assets competitively in the dispatch merit order in certain of the countries in which we operate. For example, Kallpas facility, a base load plant and combined cycle gas turbine, is among the first power plants to be dispatched, due to its efficiency and competitiveness in the dispatch stack. Similarly, CDAs plant, as a hydroelectric power plant, will also be among the first power plants to be dispatched in Peru once it reaches its COD in 2016. Having a portfolio which includes efficient power plants with lower production costs allows us to potentially earn higher margins than companies that utilize certain other competing technologies in their plants and are therefore less competitive in the dispatch merit order.
Experienced management team with strong local presence Our management team has extensive experience in the power generation business. Our executive officers have an average of approximately 20 years of experience in the power generation industry, and significant portions of our core management team have been working together in international large power generation companies since 1996. We believe that this overall level of experience contributes to our ability to effectively manage our existing operating companies and to identify, evaluate and integrate high-quality growth opportunities within and outside Latin America. Furthermore, our hands-on management team utilizes a lean decision-making process, which allows us to quickly take advantage of strategic acquisitions and potential developments and opportunities as they materialize. Our managers are compensated, in part, on the basis of our financial performance, which incentivizes them to continue to improve our operating results. Additionally, our local management teams provide in-depth market knowledge and power industry experience. These teams consist primarily of local executives with significant experience in the local energy industry and with local government regulators. We believe that the market-specific experience of our local management provides us with insight into the local regulatory, political and business environment in each of the countries in which we operate.
140
Strong and dedicated shareholder with experience operating growth-oriented businesses and a long-term commitment to our growth Our shareholder owns businesses, in whole or in part, ranging from established, cash generating businesses to early stage development companies. The international profile, experience and commitment of our shareholder in operating growth-oriented businesses, lends us credibility in conducting our operations and project development, particularly with respect to large national and international companies, such as our customers, and international financial institutions which are an important source of financing for our assets. Upon completion of this offering, Kenon will remain our controlling shareholder. Kenon, which is dual-listed on the NYSE and the TASE under the symbol KEN, was formed in 2014 to serve as the holding company of various dynamic, primarily growth-oriented businesses, including IC Power, which were contributed to Kenon by its former parent, IC, in a spin-off completed in January 2015.
Business Strategy
Continue to successfully develop greenfield assets in attractive markets One of our core competencies is identifying, evaluating, constructing, and operating greenfield development projects in our target markets. We will continue to seek to develop power generation assets in countries with relatively stable, growing economies, low levels of per capita energy consumption or developing private energy generation markets. We also seek to develop assets that can be expanded through further investment, or as additional fuels become available, which provides us with the ability to further develop an asset and increase its installed capacity in connection with market trends, industry developments, or changing fuel availability.
We place particular focus on our ability to complete the development of our greenfield projects on time and within budget and will continue to use extensive project planning and contracting mechanisms to minimize our development risk. For example, in connection with our development activities, we typically enter into lump-sum, turnkey EPC contracts to minimize our construction risks and mitigate construction cost overruns, while also entering into long-term PPAs to generate stable and predictable margins and cash flows; we believe this combination facilitates our access to construction financing. Engaging in such practices has allowed us to successfully complete several thermal generation projects, including the Kallpa facility, our largest development to date. Additionally, our first hydroelectric development, CDAs plant, is expected to be fully operational at a cost of $1.9 million per MW, making CDAs plant among the most efficiently constructed hydroelectric facilities in Latin America in terms of cost per MW.
Optimize portfolio to maximize returns while minimizing risk We regularly assess our portfolio of operating companies and employ disciplined portfolio management principles to optimize our operations in light of changing industry dynamics in a particular country or region, create financing flexibility and address specific risk management and exposure concerns. Our strategy is to optimize the composition of our portfolio by focusing on profitable developments and acquisitions within key power generation markets typically in Latin America, the Caribbean and Israel.
For example, prior to our 2014 acquisition of the Las Flores facility, a 193 MW thermal power generation plant (representing 145 MW on a proportionate basis), Las Flores had operated intermittently due to the lack of a long-term regular supply of natural gas. The Kallpa facility, which is located near the Las Flores plant, had an excess supply of natural gas. We identified these and other potential synergies and, since our acquisition of the Las Flores facility, have been able to significantly improve the operations and generation activities of Las Flores plant, while also maximizing the use of the Kallpa facilitys natural gas supply and transportation capabilities. Our recent acquisition of Puerto Quetzal serves as another example of our portfolio optimization efforts. In addition to providing us with an attractive entry point into the Guatemalan market, one of the barges we acquired from Puerto Quetzal was recently redeployed to Panama to allow Kanan to take advantage of a short-term supply shortfall in the Panamanian power market. Additionally, in 2014, we divested our 21% indirect equity interest in Edegel, one of Perus largest power generation companies. While the Edegel investment was a strong cash flow generator which helped to fund the initial stages of our growth, we opted to sell this investment in order to redeploy the proceeds from such sale into projects in which we have a majority control and which we believe will have a better risk and return profile for our shareholders over the long-term.
141
Complement our organic development with dynamic and disciplined acquisitions We seek to invest in countries and/or assets where we can significantly increase our cash flows and optimize our operations. Therefore, in addition to greenfield developments, we also seek to enter into and/or expand our presence in attractive markets by acquiring controlling interests in operating assets to anchor our geographical expansion. For example, we recently acquired power generation assets in Nicaragua, Guatemala and Colombia, which represents our initial entry into these markets, through our acquisitions of (1) ICPNH, which provided us with controlling interests in two HFO and two wind energy Nicaraguan generation companies, (2) Puerto Quetzal, which provided us with three power barges with HFO generators (one of which was recently transferred to our subsidiary Kanan to allow it to take advantage of supply shortfalls in the Panamanian power market), and (3) Surpetroil, a company that utilizes stranded natural gas reserves in its production of energy. Chile and Colombia represent important parts of our growth strategy. We continue to seek expansion in Chile and Colombia, and we expect that our assets in these countries will provide us with the initial footprint from which to carry out our organic development strategy in these two markets. Additionally, consistent with our strategy of maintaining controlling interests in our power generation assets, in May 2014, we increased our equity ownership in JPPC (which has an aggregate 60 MW of installed capacity in two HFO generation units in Jamaica) from 16% to 100%, and in January 2015, we increased our equity ownership in Nejapa (which has 140 MW of installed capacity at an HFO power generation facility in El Salvador) from 71% to 100%. We will continue to seek to leverage our acquisitions of assets in new markets and/or of assets utilizing a broad range of technologies (which may include new fuels, such as solar power) to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns.
Continue to enter into long-term PPAs with credit-worthy counterparties In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, we made 88% and 92%, respectively, of our aggregate energy sales (in GWh) pursuant to PPAs, many of which are denominated in, or linked to, the U.S. Dollar. Our strategy of generating strong and predictable cash flows from long-term PPAs has enabled us to successfully secure financing for our greenfield projects from a diverse international lender base to fund our development and construction projects. We seek to enter into long-term capacity PPAs prior to committing to a new project so as to accurately determine expected cash flows and margins of a particular asset, which facilitates its financing. For example, although the CDA plant is yet to reach its COD, CDA has sourced and entered into two long-term PPAs beginning in 2016 and 2018 for a significant portion of its expected capacity, contracting most of the estimated firm energy it expects to generate between 2018 and 2027. The expected cash flows associated with such PPAs contributed to CDAs attractive credit profile, which supported the financing of CDAs plants development. Similarly, the Peruvian government has guaranteed capacity payments for 600 MW of the expected capacity of Samay Is plant for a 20-year period at rates above regulated capacity rates, which also provided support for the financing of the plants development. In addition to significantly improving our access to financing with no or limited recourse, our strategy of contracting our assets energy and capacity significantly reduces our exposure to changes in spot prices.
Background and History
ICP was incorporated in January 2010 as a limited liability company under the laws of the State of Israel. ICP holds a 100% interest in Inkia and ICPI.
Inkia was formed in June 2007 by IC as a special purpose vehicle to acquire Globeleqs power generation assets and property in Latin America and the Caribbean. In April 2010, IC transferred the shares of Inkia to ICP.
In February 2010, IC purchased 80% of OPC from Ofer Brothers (Energy Holdings) Ltd, or Ofer Energy. In April 2010, ICPI was incorporated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of IC, and the shares of OPC owned by IC were transferred from IC to ICPI. In June 2010, IC transferred the shares of ICPI to ICP.
As set forth above, ICP and its businesses shall be contributed to us by our parent, Kenon, prior to the completion of this offering, through a Reorganization described in further detail in Corporate Formation and
142
Reorganization . Additionally, prior to the completion of this offering, we will be converted into a Singapore public company limited by shares and renamed . Set forth below is a further summary of the history and development of ICPs portfolio of assets.
Original Inkia Assets
In June 2007, Inkia acquired the outstanding shares of Globeleq, which indirectly owned:
| 100% of the outstanding shares of KallpaWhen Inkia acquired its interest in Kallpa in 2007, Kallpa I was still under commissioning and reached its COD a few days after Inkias acquisition of Kallpa. Between July 2007 and August 2012, we developed the Kallpa I, Kallpa II and Kallpa III turbines and completed the conversion of the Kallpa facility from an open-cycle to a combined-cycle operation. In October 2009, Quimpac agreed to subscribe to newly-issued shares of Kallpa, representing 25% of Kallpas issued and outstanding shares, thereby reducing Inkias interest in Kallpa to 75%; |
| 100% of the outstanding shares of COBEE and Cenérgica; |
| 97% of the outstanding shares of CEPP; |
| 87% of the outstanding shares of Nejapa Holdings, the sole member of NejapaIn October 2008, Nejapa Holdings issued additional shares to Crystal Power pursuant to a shareholders agreement, thereby reducing Inkias interest in Nejapa to 71%. We increased our ownership interest in Nejapa to 100% in January 2015; |
| 68% of the outstanding shares of Southern Cone, which at the time owned 38% of the outstanding shares of Generandes, which, in turn, owned 54% of the outstanding shares of EdegelIn 2010, we purchased the remaining 32% of Southern Cones share capital. We divested of Southern Cone, thereby divesting of our 21% indirect equity interest in Edegel, in September 2014; |
| 21% of the outstanding shares of Pedregal; and |
| 16% of the outstanding shares of JPPCWe increased our ownership interest in JPPC to 100% in May 2014. |
In April 2010, IC transferred 100% of the outstanding shares of Inkia to ICP.
ICPI
In February 2010, IC purchased 80% of OPC from Ofer Energy.
In June 2010, IC transferred 100% of the outstanding shares of OPC to ICPI, a wholly-owned subsidiary of ICP.
Additional Portfolio Changes
Since ICPs formation in 2010, ICP has added the following assets to its portfolio:
| 87% of the outstanding shares of Central Cardones in December 2011; |
| 100% of the outstanding shares of Colmito in October 2013; |
143
| 100% of the outstanding shares of ICPNH in March 2014; through ICPNH, we indirectly hold 65% interests in Corinto and Tipitapa Power and 61% interests in Amayo I and Amayo II; |
| 60% of the outstanding shares of Surpetroil in March 2014; |
| Las Floress 193 MW power plant; and |
| 100% of the outstanding shares of Puerto Quetzal in September 2014. |
ICP formed CDA, Samay I and Kanan in July 2010, July 2010 and August 2013, respectively, and acquired AIE in August 2015, to carry out their respective greenfield development projects.
The table below presents information, by country, about our installed capacity as of the dates indicated. For information on our ownership interest in each of these assets during the periods below, see Portfolio Overview .
As of
2015 |
As of December 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Original Inkia Assets 1 : |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
El Salvador (Nejapa) 2 |
140 | 140 | 140 | 140 | 140 | 140 | 140 | 140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Panama (Pedregal) |
54 | 54 | 54 | 54 | 54 | 54 | 54 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bolivia (COBEE) |
228 | 228 | 228 | 228 | 228 | 228 | 228 | 228 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dominican Republic (CEPP) |
67 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 67 | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jamaica (JPPC) 3 |
60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
549 | 549 | 549 | 549 | 549 | 549 | 549 | 549 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greenfield: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru (Kallpa) 4 |
870 | 870 | 870 | 870 | 578 | 578 | 368 | 174 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Israel (OPC) |
440 | 440 | 440 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
1,310 | 1,310 | 1,310 | 870 | 578 | 578 | 368 | 174 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru (Las Flores) |
193 | 193 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nicaragua (ICPNH) |
185 | 185 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Guatemala (Puerto Quetzal) |
179 | 179 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chile (Central Cardones) |
153 | 153 | 153 | 153 | 153 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chile (Colmito) |
58 | 58 | 58 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colombia (Surpetroil) |
15 | 15 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
783 | 783 | 211 | 153 | 153 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total installed capacity |
2,642 | 2,642 | 2,070 | 1,572 | 1,280 | 1,127 | 917 | 723 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Assets in Advanced Stages of Construction: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru (CDA) |
510 | 5 | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru (Samay I) |
600 | 5 | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Panama (Kanan) |
92 | 5 | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,202 | 5 | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Does not reflect the installed capacity of Edegel, an original Inkia asset. In September 2014, we divested our indirect 21% equity interest in Edegel. |
2. | In January 2015, we acquired the 29% of Nejapas outstanding equity interest that we did not own, which increased our equity interest in Nejapa from 71% to 100%. |
3. | In May 2014, we acquired the 84% of JPPCs outstanding equity interest that we did not own, which increased our equity interest in JPPC from 16% to 100%. |
144
4. | When Inkia acquired its interest in Kallpa in 2007, Kallpa I was still under commissioning and reached its COD a few days after Inkias acquisition of Kallpa. Between July 2007 and August 2012, we developed the Kallpa II and Kallpa III turbines and completed the conversion of the Kallpa facility from an open-cycle to a combined-cycle operation. |
5. | Represents expected installed capacity, assuming completion of the assets in advanced stages of construction. |
Portfolio Overview
Our current operations are focused in Latin American and Caribbean markets that are characterized by relatively high rates of GDP growth and relatively low base levels of per capita energy consumption (in comparison to those of developed markets). In July 2013, OPC became the first IPP in Israel when it completed the construction of its plant and commenced commercial operations. Collectively, our operations had an installed capacity of 2,642 MW (2,149 MW on a proportionate basis) as of June 30, 2015, and we expect our operations to reach an installed capacity of 3,844 MW (3,074 MW on a proportionate basis) by the middle of 2016, upon the completion of certain assets in advanced stages of construction, which consists of CDA and Samay I in Peru, and Kanan in Panama. Our portfolio includes power generation plants that operate on a range of fuels, including natural gas, hydroelectric, HFO, diesel and wind.
We own, operate and develop power plants to generate and sell electricity to distribution companies and unregulated consumers under long-term PPAs and to the spot market. Our largest asset is our Kallpa facility, group of combined-cycle plants in Peru that includes three gas-fired turbines and a steam generator and is the largest power generation facility in Peru in terms of capacity.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015:
| 88% of our aggregate energy sales (in GWh) were made pursuant to long-term PPAs, mitigating our exposure to fluctuating electricity and fuel prices; |
| we sold 3,275 GWh, representing 42% of volume sold, to distribution companies, 3,608 GWh, representing 46% of volume sold, to consumers in the unregulated markets and 952 GWh, representing 12% of volume sold, in the spot markets; and |
| our operating company in Peru generated 51% of our net income and 45% of our Adjusted EBITDA. |
The following charts set forth the relative percentages of our installed capacity by energy source as of June 30, 2015, and our expected installed capacity by energy source, as adjusted to assume the completion of our assets in advanced stages of construction (the CDA, Samay I and Kanan assets), and excluding additional capacity which may become available through other acquisitions or projects that we may complete by mid-2016 or other potential changes to our capacity:
Actual Installed Capacity by Energy Source (as of June 30, 2015) 1 |
Expected Installed Capacity by Energy Source (Middle of 2016) |
|
|
|
1. | Our dual-fueled assets, OPC, Samay I and Colmito, are categorized as natural gas, diesel and natural gas, respectively. |
145
The following charts set forth the relative percentage of our installed capacity by segment as of June 30, 2015, and our expected installed capacity by segment, as adjusted to assume the completion of our assets in advanced stages of construction (the CDA, Samay I and Kanan assets), and excluding additional capacity which may become available through other acquisitions or projects that we may complete by mid-2016 or other potential changes to our capacity:
Actual Installed Capacity by Segment (as of June 30, 2015) |
Expected Installed Capacity by Segment (Middle of 2016) |
|
|
|
The following table sets forth summary financial information for our subsidiaries as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity |
Ownership
Interest (%) |
Sales |
Cost of
Sales |
Adjusted
EBITDA 1 |
Outstanding
debt |
Net
debt 2 |
||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa |
75 | $ | 225 | $ | 139 | $ | 78 | $ | 438 | $ | 409 | |||||||||||||
Assets in advance stages of construction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDA |
75 | | | | 546 | 453 | ||||||||||||||||||
Samay I |
75 | | | | 244 | 221 | ||||||||||||||||||
Israel segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPC |
80 | 157 | 112 | 43 | 422 | 210 | ||||||||||||||||||
Central America segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICPNH 3 |
61-65 | 57 | 37 | 18 | 104 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Quetzal 4 |
100 | 60 | 54 | 5 | 22 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nejapa 5 |
100 | 53 | 46 | 6 | | (27 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cenérgica |
100 | 5 | 3 | 1 | | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Assets in advance stages of construction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kanan |
100 | | | | | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
COBEE |
100 | 22 | 8 | 11 | 79 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Central Cardones |
87 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 47 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Colmito |
100 | 20 | 17 | 2 | 18 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||
CEPP |
97 | 20 | 17 | 3 | 25 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||
JPPC 6 |
100 | 24 | 21 | 2 | 7 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Surpetroil 7 |
60 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inkia & Other 8 |
100 | | | | 448 | 302 | ||||||||||||||||||
ICP & Other |
100 | | | (1 | ) | 111 | 9 | 84 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 655 | $ | 458 | $ | 175 | $ | 2,514 | $ | 1,893 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
1. | Adjusted EBITDA for each entity is defined as net income (loss), excluding net income from discontinued operations, net of tax (excluding dividends received from discontinued operations), before depreciation and amortization, finance expenses, net, income tax expense (benefit) and asset write-off, and excluding share in income from associates, measurement to fair value of our-existing share, and recognized negative goodwill. |
Adjusted EBITDA is not recognized under IFRS or any other generally accepted accounting principles as measures of financial performance and should not be considered as substitutes for net income or loss, cash flow from operations or other measures of operating performance or liquidity determined in accordance with IFRS. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent funds available for dividends or other discretionary uses because those funds may be required for debt service, capital expenditures, working capital and other commitments and contingencies. Adjusted EBITDA presents limitations that impair its use as a measure of profitability since it does not take into consideration certain costs and expenses that result from each business that could have a significant effect on its net income, such as financial expenses, taxes, depreciation, capital expenses and other related charges.
The following tables set forth a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA for our subsidiaries for the six months ended June 30, 2015:
Kallpa | CDA | Samay I | OPC | ICPNH |
Puerto
Quetzal |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) (i) |
$ | 24 | $ | (1 | ) (ii) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 13 | $ | 8 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
25 | | | 12 | 5 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance expenses, net |
18 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
11 | | | 5 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 78 | $ | | $ | | $ | 43 | $ | 18 | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Reflects net income (loss) after elimination and consolidation of adjustments. |
(ii) | Non-operating income relating to swaps. |
Nejapa | Cenérgica | COBEE |
Central
Cardones |
Colmito | ||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) (i) |
$ | 2 | $ | 1 | $ | 5 | $ | 2 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3 | | 2 | 2 | | |||||||||||||||
Finance expenses, net |
| | 3 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1 | | 1 | 1 | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 6 | $ | 1 | $ | 11 | $ | 6 | $ | 2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Reflects net income (loss) after elimination and consolidation of adjustments. |
CEPP | JPPC | Surpetroil |
ICP
& Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) (i) |
$ | 2 | $ | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 43 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 58 | |||||||||||||||
Finance expenses, net |
(1 | ) | | 1 | 10 | 53 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
1 | | | (1 | ) | 21 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 3 | $ | 2 | $ | 1 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 175 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Reflects net income (loss) after elimination and consolidation of adjustments. |
2. | Net debt is defined as total debt attributable to the relevant subsidiary, minus the cash and short term deposits and restricted cash of such companies. Net debt is not a measure of liabilities in accordance with IFRS. The tables below set forth a reconciliation of net debt to total debt for our subsidiaries. |
147
COBEE |
Central
Cardones |
Colmito | CEPP | JPPC | Surpetroil |
Inkia &
Other |
ICP
& Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 79 | $ | 47 | $ | 18 | $ | 25 | $ | 7 | $ | 3 | $ | 448 | $ | 111 | $ | 2,514 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash, short term deposits and restricted cash |
25 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 146 | 27 | 621 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net Debt |
$ | 54 | $ | 43 | $ | 16 | $ | 24 | $ | 3 | $ | 2 | $ | 302 | $ | 84 | $ | 1,893 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. | Through ICPNH, we indirectly hold 65% interests in Corinto and Tipitapa Power and 61% interests in Amayo I and Amayo II. |
4. | Figures include Puerto Quetzal and Poliwatt Limited (one of our subsidiaries that performs administrative functions and maintains certain licenses on behalf of Puerto Quetzal). |
5. | In January 2015, we acquired Crystal Powers 29% stake in Nejapa in connection with the settlement of our shareholder dispute with Crystal Power. Figures include amounts related to Nejapas branch and main office. |
6. | Figures include JPPC and Private Power Operator Ltd. (one of our subsidiaries that employs JPPCs employees and performs administrative-related functions). |
7. | Figures include Surpetroil and Surenergy S.A.S ESP (one of our subsidiaries that performs administrative functions and maintains certain licenses on behalf of Surpetroil). |
8. | Reflects Inkias outstanding debt. |
9. | Includes $12 million of outstanding ICP debt and $99 million of ICPI debt. |
The following table sets forth summary financial information for our subsidiaries as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2014:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity |
Ownership
Interest (%) |
Sales |
Cost of
Sales |
Adjusted
EBITDA 1 |
Outstanding
debt |
Net
debt 2 |
||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa |
75 | $ | 225 | $ | 145 | $ | 75 | $ | 482 | $ | 452 | |||||||||||||
Assets in advance stages of construction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDA |
75 | | | | 224 | 135 | ||||||||||||||||||
Samay I |
75 | | | | | (22 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Israel segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPC 3 |
80 | 202 | 141 | 56 | 481 | 340 | ||||||||||||||||||
Central America segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICPNH 4 |
61-65 | 53 | 39 | 13 | 110 | 94 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nejapa 5 |
71 | 69 | 62 | 6 | 4 | (9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cenérgica |
100 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 1 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets in advance stages of construction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kanan |
100 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
COBEE |
100 | 21 | 9 | 9 | 66 | 48 | ||||||||||||||||||
Central Cardones |
87 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 50 | 47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Colmito |
100 | 23 | 22 | 2 | 22 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||
CEPP |
97 | 40 | 30 | 8 | 32 | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||
JPPC 6 |
100 | 7 | 6 | | 9 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Surpetroil 7 |
60 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inkia & Other 8 |
100 | | | (7 | ) | 447 | 410 | |||||||||||||||||
ICP & Other 9 |
100 | | | | 102 | 10 | 74 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 661 | $ | 468 | $ | 168 | $ | 2,035 | $ | 1,629 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Adjusted EBITDA for each entity is defined as net income (loss), excluding net income from discontinued operations, net of tax (excluding dividends received from discontinued operations), before depreciation and amortization, finance expenses, net, income tax expense (benefit) and asset write-off, and excluding share in income from associates, measurement to fair value of our-existing share, and recognized negative goodwill. |
148
Adjusted EBITDA is not recognized under IFRS or any other generally accepted accounting principles as measures of financial performance and should not be considered as substitutes for net income or loss, cash flow from operations or other measures of operating performance or liquidity determined in accordance with IFRS. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent funds available for dividends or other discretionary uses because those funds may be required for debt service, capital expenditures, working capital and other commitments and contingencies. Adjusted EBITDA presents limitations that impair its use as a measure of profitability since it does not take into consideration certain costs and expenses that result from each business that could have a significant effect on its net income, such as financial expenses, taxes, depreciation, capital expenses and other related charges. |
The following tables set forth a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA for our subsidiaries for the six months ended June 30, 2014: |
Kallpa | CDA | OPC | ICPNH | |||||||||||||
($ millions) |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) (i) |
$ | 25 | $ | (1 | ) (ii) | $ | 21 | $ | 6 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
22 | | 13 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Finance expenses, net |
16 | 1 | 15 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
12 | | 7 | 1 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 75 | $ | | $ | 56 | $ | 13 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Reflects net income (loss) after elimination and consolidation of adjustments. |
(ii) | Non-operating income relating to swaps. |
(i) | Reflects net income (loss) after elimination and consolidation of adjustments. |
CEPP | JPPC | Surpetroil |
Inkia &
Other |
ICP &
Other |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) (i) |
$ | 5 | $ | | $ | | $ | 36 | $ | (20 | ) | $ | 79 | |||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax, excluding dividends received from discontinued operations |
| | | (7 | ) | | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1 | | | 4 | | 51 | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance expenses, net |
| | | 13 | 15 | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
2 | | 1 | | 5 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| | | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
| | | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Negative goodwill |
| | | (48 | ) | | (48 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 8 | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | | $ | 168 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Reflects net income (loss) after elimination and consolidation of adjustments. |
2. | Net debt is defined as total debt attributable to the relevant subsidiary, minus the cash and short term deposits and restricted cash of such companies. Net debt is not a measure of liabilities in accordance with IFRS. The tables below set forth a reconciliation of net debt to total debt for our subsidiaries. |
149
Kallpa | CDA | Samay I | OPC | ICPNH |
Puerto
Quetzal |
Nejapa | Cenérgica | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 482 | $ | 224 | $ | | $ | 481 | $ | 110 | $ | | $ | 4 | $ | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash, short term deposits and restricted cash |
30 | 89 | 22 | 141 | 16 | | 13 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net Debt |
$ | 452 | $ | 135 | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 340 | $ | 94 | $ | | $ | (9 | ) | $ | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COBEE |
Central
Cardones |
Colmito | CEPP | JPPC | Surpetroil |
Inkia &
Other |
ICP &
Other |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 66 | $ | 50 | $ | 22 | $ | 32 | $ | 9 | $ | 5 | $ | 447 | $ | 102 | $ | 2,035 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash, short term deposits and restricted cash |
18 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | | 37 | 28 | 406 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net Debt |
$ | 48 | $ | 47 | $ | 19 | $ | 29 | $ | 7 | $ | 5 | $ | 410 | $ | 74 | $ | 1,629 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. | Reflects tariffs in 2014, which were higher than the applicable tariffs in 2015. |
4. | Reflects 100% of ICPNHs financial results from the date of consolidation (March 2014). Through ICPNH, we indirectly hold 65% interests in Corinto and Tipitapa Power and 61% interests in Amayo I and Amayo II. |
5. | In January 2015, we acquired Crystal Powers 29% stake in Nejapa in connection with the settlement of our shareholder dispute with Crystal Power. Figures include amounts related to Nejapas branch and main office. |
6. | Reflects 100% of JPPCs financial results from the date of consolidation (May 2014). Reflects 16% of JPPCs financial results prior to May 2014. Figures include JPPC and Private Power Operator Ltd. (one of our subsidiaries that employs JPPCs employees and performs administrative-related functions). |
7. | Reflects 100% of Surpetroils financial results from the date of consolidation (March 2014). Figures include Surpetroil and Surenergy S.A.S ESP (one of our subsidiaries that performs administrative functions and maintains certain licenses on behalf of Surpetroil). |
8. | Reflects Inkias outstanding debt. |
9. | Includes the results of Acter Holdings, which primarily consists of our proportionate share of Generandes results of operations, which are reflected in our income statement as discontinued operations. |
10. | Includes $102 million of outstanding ICPI debt. |
The following table sets forth summary financial information for our businesses subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014:
Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity |
Ownership
|
Sales |
Cost of
|
Adjusted
|
Outstanding
|
Net debt 2 |
||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa |
75 | $ | 437 | $ | 270 | $ | 154 | $ | 453 | $ | 428 | |||||||||||||
Assets in advanced stages of construction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDA |
75 | | | | 444 | 338 | ||||||||||||||||||
Samay I |
75 | | | | 145 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Israel segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPC 3 |
80 | 413 | 252 | 153 | 419 | 231 | ||||||||||||||||||
Central America segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICPNH 4 |
61-65 | 125 | 98 | 22 | 108 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Quetzal 5 |
100 | 33 | 29 | 3 | 32 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nejapa 6 |
71 | 132 | 119 | 11 | | (23 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cenérgica |
100 | 18 | 14 | 4 | | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Assets in advanced stages of construction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kanan |
100 | | | | | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
COBEE |
100 | 41 | 18 | 19 | 85 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Central Cardones |
87 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 48 | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Colmito |
100 | 38 | 36 | 2 | 20 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||
CEPP |
97 | 73 | 56 | 16 | 30 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||
JPPC 7 |
100 | 41 | 39 | 1 | 8 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Surpetroil 8 |
60 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inkia & Other |
100 | 1 | | 1 | 447 | 9 | 262 | |||||||||||||||||
ICP & Other 10 |
100 | | | (3 | ) | 106 | 11 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,372 | $ | 936 | $ | 395 | $ | 2,348 | $ | 1,557 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
1. | Adjusted EBITDA for each entity is defined as net income (loss), excluding net income from discontinued operations, net of tax (excluding dividends received from discontinued operations), before depreciation and amortization, finance expenses, net, income tax expense (benefit) and asset write-off, and excluding share in income from associates, measurement to fair value of our existing share, and recognized negative goodwill. |
Adjusted EBITDA is not recognized under IFRS or any other generally accepted accounting principles as a measure of financial performance and should not be considered as a substitute for net income or loss, cash flow from operations or other measures of operating performance or liquidity determined in accordance with IFRS. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent funds available for dividends or other discretionary uses because those funds may be required for debt service, capital expenditures, working capital and other commitments and contingencies. Adjusted EBITDA presents limitations that impair its use as a measure of profitability since it does not take into consideration certain costs and expenses that result from each business that could have a significant effect on its net income, such as financing expenses, taxes, depreciation, capital expenses and other related charges.
The following tables set forth a reconciliation of net income (loss) to Adjusted EBITDA for our subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2014:
Kallpa |
CDA |
OPC |
ICPNH |
Puerto
|
||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) (i) |
$ | 50 | $ | 7 | (ii) | $ | 71 | $ | 6 | $ | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
46 | | 25 | 8 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
35 | | 31 | 7 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
23 | (7 | ) | 26 | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 154 | $ | | $ | 153 | $ | 22 | $ | 3 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Reflects net income (loss) after elimination and consolidation of adjustments. |
(ii) | Non-operating income relating to swaps. |
Nejapa |
Cenérgica |
COBEE |
Central
|
Colmito |
||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) (i) |
$ | 4 | $ | 2 | $ | 9 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
5 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
| | 4 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 11 | $ | 4 | $ | 19 | $ | 7 | $ | 2 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Reflects net income (loss) after elimination and consolidation of adjustments. |
CEPP |
JPPC |
Surpetroil |
Inkia &
|
ICP & Others |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) (i) |
$ | 9 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | 131 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 268 | ||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax, excluding dividends received from discontinued operations (ii) |
| | | (113 | ) | | (113 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | | 108 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
1 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 12 | 119 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
3 | (1 | ) | 1 | (8 | ) | 4 | 51 | ||||||||||||||||
Asset write-off |
| | | 35 | | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Share in income (loss) from associates |
| | | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
| | | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Recognized negative goodwill |
| | | (68 | ) | | (68 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 16 | $ | 1 | $ | 5 | $ | 1 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 395 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Reflects net income (loss) after elimination and consolidation of adjustments. |
(ii) | Excludes $15 million received from Edegel post-equity method accounting, which is reflected as other income in our discontinued operations for the period. |
151
2. | Net debt is defined as total debt attributable to the relevant subsidiary, minus the cash and short term deposits and restricted cash of such companies. Net debt is not a measure of liabilities in accordance with IFRS. The tables below set forth a reconciliation of net debt to total debt for our subsidiaries. |
Kallpa |
CDA |
Samay I |
OPC |
ICPNH |
Puerto
|
Nejapa |
Cenérgica |
Kanan |
COBEE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 453 | $ | 444 | $ | 145 | $ | 419 | $ | 108 | $ | 32 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 85 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash, short term deposits and restricted cash |
25 | 106 | 134 | 188 | 16 | 18 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net debt |
$ | 428 | $ | 338 | $ | 11 | $ | 231 | $ | 92 | $ | 14 | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 43 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Cardones |
Colmito |
CEPP |
JPPC |
Surpetroil |
Inkia &
|
ICP & Others |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 48 | $ | 20 | $ | 30 | $ | 8 | $ | 3 | $ | 447 | $ | 106 | $ | 2,348 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash, short term deposits and restricted cash |
4 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 185 | 28 | 791 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net debt |
$ | 44 | $ | 19 | $ | 22 | $ | 4 | $ | 2 | $ | 262 | $ | 78 | $ | 1,557 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. | Reflects tariffs in 2014, which were higher than the applicable tariffs in 2015. |
4. | Reflects 100% of ICPNHs financial results from the date of consolidation (March 2014). Through ICPNH, we indirectly hold 65% interests in Corinto and Tipitapa Power and 61% interests in Amayo I and Amayo II. |
5. | Reflects 100% of Puerto Quetzals financial results from the date of consolidation (September 2014). Figures include Puerto Quetzal and Poliwatt Limited (one of our subsidiaries that performs administrative functions and maintains certain licenses on behalf of Puerto Quetzal). |
6. | In January 2015, we acquired Crystal Powers 29% stake in Nejapa in connection with the settlement of our shareholder dispute with Crystal Power. Figures include amounts related to Nejapas branch and main office. |
7. | Reflects 100% of JPPCs financial results from the date of consolidation (May 2014). Reflects 16% of JPPCs financial results prior to May 2014. Figures include JPPC and Private Power Operator Ltd (one of our subsidiaries that employs JPPCs employees and performs administrative-related functions). |
8. | Reflects 100% of Surpetroils financial results from the date of consolidation (March 2014). Figures include Surpetroil and Surenergy S.A.S ESP (one of our subsidiaries that performs administrative functions and maintains certain licenses on behalf of Surpetroil). |
9. | Reflects Inkias outstanding debt. |
10. | Includes the results of Acter Holdings, which primarily consists of our proportionate share of Generandes results of operations, which are reflected in our income statement as discontinued operations. |
11. | Includes $12 million of outstanding ICP debt and $93 million of ICPI debt. |
152
The following table sets forth summary financial information for our subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity |
Ownership
|
Sales |
Cost of
|
Adjusted
|
Outstanding
|
Net debt 2 |
||||||||||||||||||
( $ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa |
75 | $ | 394 | $ | 239 | $ | 141 | $ | 365 | $ | 351 | |||||||||||||
Assets in advanced stages of construction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDA |
100 | | | | 109 | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||
Samay I |
100 | | | | | (28 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Israel segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPC 3 |
80 | 187 | 139 | 43 | 487 | 424 | ||||||||||||||||||
Central America segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nejapa 4 |
71 | 135 | 121 | 11 | | (17 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Cenérgica |
100 | 12 | 6 | 6 | | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
COBEE |
100 | 41 | 18 | 18 | 50 | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
Central Cardones |
87 | 11 | 2 | 7 | 51 | 48 | ||||||||||||||||||
Colmito 5 |
100 | 1 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
CEPP |
97 | 92 | 69 | 21 | 38 | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acter 6 |
100 | | | | 122 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Inkia & Other 7 |
100 | | | | 447 | 8 | 295 | |||||||||||||||||
ICP & Other |
100 | | | | | (40 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 873 | $ | 594 | $ | 247 | $ | 1,669 | $ | 1,143 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Adjusted EBITDA for each entity is defined as net income, excluding net income from discontinued operations, net of tax (excluding dividends received from discontinued operations), before depreciation and amortization, finance expenses, net, income tax expense (benefit) and asset write-off, and excluding share in income from associates, measurement to fair value of our existing share, and recognized negative goodwill. |
Adjusted EBITDA is not recognized under IFRS or any other generally accepted accounting principles as measures of financial performance and should not be considered as substitutes for net income or loss, cash flow from operations or other measures of operating performance or liquidity determined in accordance with IFRS. Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to represent funds available for dividends or other discretionary uses because those funds may be required for debt service, capital expenditures, working capital and other commitments and contingencies. Adjusted EBITDA presents limitations that impair its use as a measure of profitability since it does not take into consideration certain costs and expenses that result from each business that could have a significant effect on its net income, such as finance expenses, taxes, depreciation, capital expenses and other related charges.
153
The following tables set forth a reconciliation of net income from continuing operations to Adjusted EBITDA for our subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2013:
Kallpa |
CDA |
Samay I |
OPC |
Nejapa |
Cenérgica |
COBEE |
||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (i) |
$ | 42 | $ | | $ | | $ | 6 | $ | 3 | $ | 4 | $ | 8 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
40 | | | 12 | 6 | 1 | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
33 | 1 | | 22 | | | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
26 | (1 | ) | | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 141 | $ | | $ | | $ | 43 | $ | 11 | $ | 6 | $ | 18 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Reflects net income after elimination and consolidation adjustments. |
Central
|
Colmito |
CEPP |
Acter |
Inkia &
|
ICP &
|
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||
($ millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (i) |
$ | 2 | $ | | $ | 12 | $ | | $ | (24 | ) | $ | | $ | 53 | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4 | | 3 | | 6 | | 76 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
1 | | 1 | | 19 | | 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
| | 5 | | 2 | | 41 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Share in income (loss) from associates |
| | | | (2 | ) | | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Recognized negative goodwill |
| | | | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 7 | $ | | $ | 21 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 247 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) | Reflects net income after elimination and consolidation adjustments. |
2. | Net debt is defined as total debt attributable to the relevant subsidiary, minus the cash and short term deposits and restricted cash of such companies. Net debt is not a measure of liabilities in accordance with IFRS. The table below sets forth a reconciliation of net debt to total debt for our subsidiaries. |
3. | Reflects tariffs in 2013, which were higher than the applicable tariffs in 2015. |
4. | In January 2015, we acquired Crystal Powers 29% stake in Nejapa in connection with the settlement of our shareholder dispute with Crystal Power. Figures include amounts related to Nejapas branch and main office. |
5. | Reflects 100% of Colmitos financial results from the date of consolidation (October 2013). |
6. | Acter Holdings, the wholly-owned subsidiary that previously held our indirect interest in Edegel prior to September 2014. |
7. | Prior to the date of JPPCs consolidation (May 2014), JPPC was an investment carried at cost basis, and any dividends were paid to Inkia were reflected in Inkia & Other during the relevant periods. |
8. | Reflects Inkias outstanding debt. |
154
The following table sets forth summary operational information for our subsidiaries and our associated company as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2015:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity |
Installed
capacity
|
Proportionate
|
Gross
|
Availability
|
Average heat
|
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Companies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa |
1,063 | 797 | 1,928 | 94 | 7,349 | 59 | 33 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Israel segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPC |
440 | 352 | 1,937 | 99 | 6,709 | 80 | 36 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Central America segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICPNH |
185 | 117 | 536 | 89 | 8,996 | 109 | 52 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Quetzal |
179 | 179 | 349 | 93 | 9,121 | 126 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Nejapa |
140 | 140 | 238 | 97 | 9,564 | 95 | 85 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COBEE |
228 | 228 | 617 | 88 | 13,697 | 37 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Central Cardones |
153 | 133 | 4 | 100 | 9,900 | 212 | 166 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Colmito |
58 | 58 | 26 | 85 | 8,622 | 120 | 110 | |||||||||||||||||||||
CEPP |
67 | 65 | 147 | 85 | 9,487 | 132 | 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||
JPPC |
60 | 60 | 214 | 83 | 7,963 | 115 | 74 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Surpetroil |
15 | 9 | 24 | 96 | 14,900 | 103 | 27 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pedregal |
54 | 11 | 194 | 92 | 8,869 | 115 | 76 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
2,642 | 2,149 | 6,214 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Reflects 100% of the capacity of each of our assets, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
2. | Reflects the proportionate capacity of each of our assets, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
3. | Heat rate is defined as the number of BTUs of energy contained in the fuel required to produce a kilowatt-hour of energy (btu/kWh) for thermal plants. |
155
The following table sets forth summary operational information for our subsidiaries and our associated company as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2014:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity 1 |
Installed
capacity
|
Proportionate
|
Gross
|
Availability
|
Average heat
|
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Companies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa |
1,063 | 797 | 2,931 | 96 | 7,158 | 54 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Israel segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPC |
440 | 352 | 1,867 | 98 | 6,741 | 103 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Central America segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICPNH |
185 | 117 | 571 | 96 | 9,006 | 150 | 91 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Nejapa |
140 | 99 | 238 | 97 | 9,610 | 182 | 152 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COBEE |
228 | 228 | 572 | 91 | 13,857 | 38 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Central Cardones |
153 | 133 | | 100 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Colmito |
58 | 58 | | 100 | 8,708 | 171 | 230 | |||||||||||||||||||||
CEPP |
67 | 65 | 99 | 93 | 9,528 | 148 | 151 | |||||||||||||||||||||
JPPC |
60 | 60 | 210 | 85 | 8,305 | 184 | 141 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Surpetroil |
15 | 9 | 23 | 62 | 14,900 | 121 | 60 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pedregal |
54 | 11 | 209 | 93 | 8,803 | 335 | 132 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
2,463 | 1,929 | 6,720 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Does not include Edegel, which we sold in September 2014. |
2. | Reflects 100% of the capacity of each of our assets, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
3. | Reflects the proportionate capacity of each of our assets, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
4. | Heat rate is defined as the number of BTUs of energy contained in the fuel required to produce a kilowatt-hour of energy (btu/kWh) for thermal plants. |
156
The following table sets forth summary operational information for our subsidiaries and our associated company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014:
Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity 1 |
Installed
capacity
|
Proportionate
|
Gross energy
|
Availability
|
Average heat
|
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Companies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa |
1,063 | 797 | 5,920 | 97 | 7,105 | 55 | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Israel segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPC |
440 | 352 | 3,465 | 90 | 6,754 | 104 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Central America segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ICPNH |
185 | 117 | 1,099 | 95 | 9,011 | 143 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Quetzal |
179 | 179 | 490 | 97 | 9,182 | 126 | 137 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Nejapa |
140 | 99 | 376 | 97 | 9,597 | 178 | 158 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COBEE |
228 | 228 | 1,085 | 91 | 13,786 | 40 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Central Cardones |
153 | 133 | | 97 | 12,238 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Colmito |
58 | 58 | 6 | 95 | 8,521 | 148 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||
CEPP |
67 | 65 | 242 | 89 | 9,539 | 227 | 146 | |||||||||||||||||||||
JPPC |
60 | 60 | 425 | 85 | 8,306 | 182 | 137 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Surpetroil |
15 | 9 | 48 | 84 | 14,900 | 140 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pedregal |
54 | 11 | 405 | 93 | 8,800 | 196 | 129 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
2,642 | 2,108 | 13,561 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Does not include Edegel, which we sold in September 2014. |
2. | Reflects 100% of the capacity of each of our assets, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
3. | Reflects the proportionate capacity of each of our assets, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
4. | Heat rate is defined as the number of BTUs of energy contained in the fuel required to produce a kilowatt-hour of energy (btu/kWh) for thermal plants. |
157
The following table sets forth summary operational information for our subsidiaries and our associated company for the year ended December 31, 2013:
Year Ended December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Entity 1 |
Installed
capacity
|
Proportionate Capacity 3 |
Gross energy
|
Availability
|
Average heat
|
Average
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Operating Companies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peru segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa |
870 | 652 | 5,459 | 93 | 7,366 | 53 | 21 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Israel segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OPC 5 |
440 | 352 | 1,357 | 96 | 6,746 | 103 | 38 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Central America segment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nejapa |
140 | 99 | 458 | 95 | 9,564 | 185 | 156 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COBEE |
228 | 228 | 1,161 | 96 | 13,942 | 37 | 16 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Central Cardones |
153 | 133 | | 98 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Colmito |
58 | 58 | 46 | 91 | | 11 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
CEPP |
67 | 65 | 339 | 87 | 9,665 | 234 | 154 | |||||||||||||||||||||
JPPC |
60 | 10 | 447 | 88 | 8,159 | 191 | 143 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pedregal |
54 | 11 | 420 | 93 | 8,800 | 201 | 137 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
2,070 | 1,608 | 9,687 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Does not include Edegel, which we sold in September 2014. |
2. | Reflects 100% of the capacity of each of our assets, regardless of our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
3. | Reflects the proportionate capacity of each of our assets, as determined by our ownership interest in the entity that owns each such asset. |
4. | Heat rate is defined as the number of BTUs of energy contained in the fuel required to produce a kilowatt-hour of energy (btu/kWh) for thermal plants. |
5. | Reached its COD in July 2013. |
Peru Segment
The following summaries provide a description of the portfolio of assets in our Peru segment.
Kallpa
We own 75% of Kallpa; the remaining 25% is held by Energía del Pacífico S.A., or Energía del Pacífico. Energía del Pacífico is a member of the Quimpac S.A. group, a Peruvian chemical company. Energía del Pacífico also holds a 25% interest in both CDA and Samay I. Kallpa is our largest asset and owns and operates two power plants, including the largest power generation facility in terms of capacity in Peru, our largest market, which utilizes natural gas for its operations. The Kallpa facilitys combined cycle plants have a capacity of 870 MW, representing approximately 10% of the total capacity in Peru, as of December 31, 2014, following the 2012 conversion of this facilitys three natural gas-powered open-cycle generation turbines into combined cycle turbines with a 292 MW steam turbine. We completed the conversion of the Kallpa facility in August 2012 at a cost of $337 million.
The Kallpa facilitys combined-cycle plants are among the most efficient plants in Peru (by cost of operations in dollars per MW capacity). As a result of Kallpas efficiency and the low cost at which it can operate, Kallpa has a competitive position in Perus market.
Kallpa has a long-term contract for the supply of natural gas not exceeding 100% of its installed capacity. The price that Kallpa pays for its supply of natural gas is based on a base price in U.S. dollars set on the
158
date of the supply agreement, indexed each year based on two producer price indices, with discounts available based on the volume of natural gas consumed. Kallpas PPAs are indexed to the underlying fuel cost under the related long-term supply agreements, which generally limits Kallpas exposure to fuel price fluctuations, helping Kallpa to maintain its margins in the event of variations in fuel prices. In April 2014, Kallpa purchased the 193 MW single turbine natural gas-fired plant Las Flores, which reached its COD in May 2010 and is located in Chilca, Peru, for $114 million, increasing Kallpas installed capacity from 870 MW to 1,063 MW, representing approximately 12% of the total installed capacity in Peru as of December 31, 2014. Prior to Kallpas acquisition of Las Flores in 2014, the Las Flores plant had operated intermittently due to the lack of a long-term regular supply of natural gas and an associated natural gas transportation contract. The Kallpa facility, which is located near the Las Flores plant, had an excess of available gas supply, and was, therefore, in a position to significantly improve the Las Flores plants operations and generation activities. Since Kallpas acquisition of Las Flores, Las Flores has been able to utilize Kallpas excess gas supply and enjoys several synergies in the use and transport of gas to its facility.
Additionally, Las Flores holds environmental permits for a future 190 MW gas-fired expansion and has sufficient space to locate such a facility, as well as a combined cycle expansion, on its existing premises. In July 2015, Kallpa received environmental approval to convert both its existing unit and the future gas turbine in Las Flores, if developed, into a combined-cycle plant. If completed, these expansion projects, which we have not committed to initiate, would increase the capacity of Las Flores plant by 400 MW from 193MW to approximately 593MW.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, Kallpa generated revenue of $225 million, $437 million, $394 million and $276 million, respectively, representing 34%, 32%, 45% and 48% of our consolidated revenues, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, Kallpa generated 5,920 GWh, representing 14% of the Peruvian interconnected systems energy production.
In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, approximately 100% and 96% of Kallpas aggregate energy sales (in GWh) were made pursuant to PPAs, respectively. As of June 30, 2015, all of Kallpas PPAs were indexed to the price of the corresponding power plants operating fuel prices in U.S. Dollars and provided for payment in, or are linked to, the U.S. Dollar, thereby generally limiting Kallpas exposure to fuel price and exchange rate fluctuations. As of June 30, 2015, the weighted average remaining life of Kallpas PPAs based on firm capacity was seven years. Kallpa has committed to sell more than 50% of its available energy (in MWh) in every year up to 2021.
The following table sets forth certain information regarding each of Kallpas turbines for each of the periods presented:
As of
June 30,
|
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Turbine |
Year of
|
Installed
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa I 1 |
2007 | 186 | 1,243 | 96 | 1,251 | 96 | 1,145 | 96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa II 1 |
2009 | 195 | 1,266 | 97 | 1,229 | 96 | 1,209 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa III 1 |
2010 | 197 | 1,262 | 96 | 1,212 | 94 | 1,286 | 92 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa IV 2 |
2012 | 292 | 2,027 | 98 | 1,767 | 86 | 642 | 97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Las Flores |
2014 | 193 | 122 | 96 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
1,063 | 5,920 | 5,459 | 4,282 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Reflects the effective capacity of the turbine at its COD. |
2. | Reflects the installed capacity. Kallpa IV is the steam turbine built to convert the Kallpa plant to combined cycle, which reached its COD in August 2012. |
159
Kallpas turbines are maintained according to a predefined schedule based upon the running hours of each turbine and the manufacturer specifications particular to it. Kallpa anticipates the first maintenance of its Kallpa IV turbine to occur in 2017 or 2018. Kallpas maintenance schedule is coordinated with, and approved by, the COES. Kallpa is a party to a services contract with Siemens Energy, Inc. and a supply and support contract with Siemens Power Generation, Inc., each of which provides for an 18-year term of service for each of the Kallpa I, II and III turbines, or the equivalent of 100,000 hours of operation, beginning in March 2006, in December 2007, and in July 2008, respectively. In addition, we have relationships with the OEM and Sulzer, which each periodically perform onsite analyses and make annual recommendations regarding line maintenance. Spare parts for the Kallpa IV turbine are generally available and can be obtained from the OEM as well as from other suppliers. In addition, this agreement was amended to include Las Flores, thereby requiring the OEM to supply spare parts, hardware and maintenance services to Las Flores during the term of the agreement.
Through Inkia, we have entered into a shareholders agreement, which grants protective minority rights to Energía del Pacífico, our 25% partner in Kallpa. For example, we and Energía del Pacífico have agreed we will each submit projects related to generation or transmission of energy in Peru to Kallpa and will not develop such projects other than through Kallpa, subject to limited exceptions. For further information on our shareholders agreements, see Shareholders Agreements and the risks related to our shareholders agreements, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our BusinessWe have granted rights to the minority shareholders of certain of our subsidiaries .
Cerro del Aguila (CDA)
We own 75% of CDA; the remaining 25% is held by Energía del Pacífico. In October 2010, Kallpa entered intoand in June 2011, Kallpa transferred to CDAa concession agreement with the State of Peru that provides a concession, which grants Kallpa, for an unlimited term, the right to construct and operate a run-of-the-river hydroelectric project on the Mantaro River in central Peru. The CDA plant is located 16 kilometers down stream of Perus largest hydroelectric complex, formed by the Mantaro hydroelectric plant and the Restitución hydroelectric plant, with capacity of 800 MW and 208 MW, respectively, and the Junin water reservoir. The Mantaro plants form the largest hydroelectric complex in Peru (in terms of capacity and generation) and run as a year round base load unit. The Junin water reservoir will provide a relatively constant water flow for the downstream power plants. We hold water rights granted by the National Water Authority ( ANAAutoridad Nacional del Agua ) in connection with the operation of the CDA plant. We estimate that the CDA plant will have an average annual load factor of 70%, which is significantly above the average (60%) for similar projects in Latin America. The CDA plant will consist of a 6 kilometer headacre tunnel and a 17 kilometer transmission line. The CDA plant is expected to have an installed capacity of 510 MW, which would make it the largest privately-owned hydroelectric plant in Peru and among the largest in Latin America.
CDA has entered into two PPAsa 15-year PPA with ElectroPerú covering 200 MW of capacity and the associated energy that commences in 2016, and a 10-year PPA with Luz del Sur S.A.A., Edelnor and Edecañete, covering 202 MW of capacity and the associated energy that commences in January 2018which will account for a significant portion of CDAs expected generation capacity. Assuming a consumption factor of 0.70 and certain volumes of capacity, peak and off-peak sales occurring at each PPAs average price (from the beginning of the PPA until 2024), we expect CDAs PPA with ElectroPerú to generate annual revenues of approximately $95 million per full year and CDAs PPA with Luz del Sur S.A.A., Edelnor S.A.A. and Edecañete S.A. to generate annual revenues of approximately $77 million per full year. Kallpa has provided bank guarantees of $16 million to secure obligations under the PPAs. As of June 30, 2015, the weighted average remaining life of CDAs PPAs based on firm capacity was 12 years. The 200 MW PPA is denominated in U.S. Dollars and indexed to the U.S. producer price index. The 202 MW PPA is denominated in the Peruvian Nuevo Sol, but is indexed to natural gas prices in Peru, which are denominated in U.S. Dollars, as well as to the U.S. producer price index, thereby providing CDA with hedges against natural gas prices and exchange rate fluctuations.
160
We expect that CDA will reach its COD in the middle of 2016. Construction of the hydroelectric plant is underway and, as of September 30, 2015, was approximately 85% completed, with 96% of the dam construction and 100% of the tunnel drilling completed. Each of the CDA plants three turbines will have a separate COD, with the first COD expected to take place in early 2016 and the last COD expected to take place in the middle of 2016. There is no certainty that the facility will be completed in accordance with current expectations. As CDA has not yet commenced commercial operations, it has not yet recognized any revenues or operating income from its operations.
Construction of the CDA plant is estimated to cost approximately $954 million. The CDA plant is expected to be fully operational at a cost of $1.9 million per MW, making the CDA plant among the most efficiently constructed hydroelectric facilities in Latin America industry in terms of cost per MW. Development of the CDA plant is being financed with the CDA Finance Facility, a $591 million syndicated credit facility, with export credit agencies, development banks and private banks, and collateralized by the assets of the project. The remaining portion of the cost of the CDA plant has been substantially financed with equity from each of Inkia and Energía del Pacífico. As of June 30, 2015, Inkia and Energía del Pacífico have invested $246 million and $82 million in CDA, respectively. In connection with the CDA Finance Facility, each of Inkia and Energía del Pacífico entered into an equity contribution and retention agreement with the administrative agent under the CDA Finance Facility and agreed, among other things, to provide contingent equity and credit support to cover cost overruns (this support obligation is limited, in our case, to $44 million). As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, CDA had invested $780 million and $633 million, respectively, into its development and had drawn $547 million and $462 million under the CDA Finance Facility, respectively. For further information regarding the terms of the CDA Finance Facility, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMaterial IndebtednessCDA Finance Facility.
In November 2011, CDA and Astaldi S.p.A. and GyM S.A., as contractors operating under the consortium name of Consorcio Río Mantaro S.A., or Río Mantaro, individually entered into a turnkey engineering, procurement and construction contract for the construction of the CDA plant, or the CDA EPC, pursuant to which each of Astaldi S.p.A. and GyM S.A. committed, on a joint and several basis, to construct the CDA plant by February 2016 and provide all services necessary for the design, engineering, procurement, construction, testing and commissioning of the CDA plant for approximately $700 million, payable on a monthly basis to Río Mantaro based upon construction completed in the previous calendar month. CDAs payments to Río Mantaro are subject to adjustments made in accordance with the CDA EPC.
In April 2014, Astaldi S.p.A. and GyM S.A., the contractors under the CDA EPC delivered a claim to CDA, demanding a six-month extension for the completion of the construction of the CDA plant (from early 2016 to the second half of 2016) and an approximately $92 million increase in the total contract price of the CDA plants development. In March 2015, we, together with the CDA EPC contractors, amended the CDA EPC to address such claims. Pursuant to the amendment, we have agreed to pay, subject to certain conditions, an additional $40 million, subdivided into four payments over the course of the remaining construction period, and granted the extensions previously requested by the CDA EPC contractors, which range between four and six months in length, depending upon the applicable CDA unit.
Should CDA experience an additional delay in reaching its COD, CDAs 15-year PPA would require CDA to pay a penalty to ElectroPerú. Although the terms of the CDA EPC entitle CDA to demand the payment of liquidated damages from Río Mantaro due to delays in the commercial operation of CDA, there is no certainty that such payments, if received, would cover the entirety of the penalties imposed under the PPA. For further information on the risks related to CDAs ability to satisfy its obligations under its PPAs, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our BusinessOur assets in advanced stages of construction may not be completed or, if completed, may not be completed on time or perform as expected.
161
Samay I
We own 75% of Samay I; the remaining 25% is held by Energía del Pacífico. In November 2013, Samay I won a public bid auction conducted by MINEM to build a cold-reserve open-cycle diesel and natural gas (dual-fired) thermoelectric plant in Mollendo, Arequipa in southern Peru, with an installed capacity of approximately 600 MW (when operated with diesel fuel) at an estimated cost of $380 million. The two-bid auction, which was won by Samay I and a subsidiary of Suez Energy, is part of an effort by the Peruvian government to promote the construction of a power node in southern Peru, which will be fueled by natural gas once a natural gas pipeline (the Gasoducto Sur Peruano, currently under construction) delivers gas to the area. Approximately 80% of the cost of the Samay I plant is expected to be financed with a $311 million seven-year syndicated secured loan agreement with Bank of Tokyo, Sumitomo and HSBC. The remaining 20% has been financed with equity from each of Inkia and Energía del Pacífico. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, Samay I has invested $267 million and $101 million into the development of the facility, respectively, and has drawn $252 million and $153 million under its credit facility, respectively. For further information on the Samay I Finance Facility, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMaterial IndebtednessSamay I Finance Facility .
The Samay I plant is expected to have three operational stages. First, it will operate as a cold reserve plant with diesel until natural gas becomes available in the area through a pipeline currently under construction. Although the pipeline developer is obligated to complete this construction by 2018, it is uncertain when the pipeline will be completed. Second, once natural gas becomes available to the facility through the new natural gas pipeline, the Samay I plant will have the obligation to operate as a natural gas-fired power plant and will be able to do so with minor investments by us in Samay Is facilities. When fueled by natural gas, the Samay I plant will have an installed capacity of approximately 720 MW. Finally, following an additional investment in the conversion of the Samay I plant, which we have not committed to make, the Samay I plant could operate as a combined cycle thermoelectric plant, which would increase Samay Is installed capacity to approximately 1,100 MW. Samay I has entered into an agreement with the State of Peru, with a term of 20 years, under which Samay I will receive fixed monthly capacity payments denominated in U.S. Dollars and we will pass-through all of the variable costs during the cold reserve phase, representing an aggregate amount of approximately $1 billion in revenues from the Samay I plant over the 20-year term of this agreement. The amount of monthly payments required to make up the total amount to which Samay I is entitled will be calculated by the COES, and will be paid by all generators that form part of the SEIN who, in their turn collect the corresponding fee from their customers through a surcharge in the transmission tariffs applicable to, and payable by, all end consumers. The surcharge does not involve the use of State funds or any appropriation process, being a mechanism that has been used for almost 20 years in Peru to cover the cost of various energy projects.
In the past, access to a supply of natural gas has been a primary factor that has limited the development of new power projects in Peru. For example, Las Flores plant operated intermittently for four years when it did not have access to a firm supply of natural gas to support its operations. In contrast, in addition to receiving a 20-year stream of capacity payments, Samay I has an advantage in being one of only two power generation companies that have defined rights to a natural gas supply and transportation capacity once the Gasoducto Sur Peruano is completed. The developer of such pipeline has a contractual obligation under its concession agreement with the State of Peru to build a branch of the pipeline to connect it with the Samay I plant. Our strategic development of the Samay I plant will provide us with a significant advantageous position in the future southern Peru power node, which will develop once the Gasoducto Sur Peruano is completed. Pursuant to the terms of its tender, Samay I must receive gas and transportation services pursuant to terms which are similar to other power plants located in other parts of Peru and served by the existing Transportadora de Gas del Perú S.A., or TGP, pipe line, such as the Kallpa plant. According to Law 29970, natural gas transportation costs of the Samay I plant will be eventually subsidized by additional tariffs on the electricity transmission toll periodically determined by OSINERGMIN with the purpose of decentralizing the generation of electricity with natural gas, which is one of the main purposes of the State of Peru developing the southern Peru power node. ElectroPerú has commenced negotiations with suppliers and concessionaires for the supply and transport of natural gas to each of
162
Samay I and the other plant with a defined right to the firm supply of natural gas. However, as ElectroPerú may not be successful in obtaining an agreement which conforms to the conditions as contemplated in the tender documents of the cold reserve bidding process, we believe Samay I has the right to reject entering into any supply and transportation agreements which do not comply with the conditions set forth in its tender.
In connection with the construction of its facility, Samay I has entered into three EPC contracts with the following parties: (1) Posco Engineering & Construction Co., Ltd. and Santos CMI Inc. (USA), for the design, construction and installation of the power station; (2) Abengoa Perú S.A. for the construction of the transmission line; and (3) Siemens Energy, Inc., Siemens S.A.C. and Siemens Power Generation, Inc. for the construction of the substation. Construction of the Samay I plant is underway and as of September 30, 2015 was approximately 91% completed. We expect that the Samay I plant will reach its COD in the middle of 2016, in accordance with the terms of its agreement with the Peruvian government; however, there is no certainty that the facility will be completed in accordance with current expectations. As Samay I has not yet commenced commercial operations, it and has not yet recognized any revenues or operating income from its operations.
Edegel
Prior to September 2014, we held a 21% indirect equity interest in Edegel, the largest generator of electricity in Peru. We owned this interest via Inkias wholly-owned subsidiary Southern Cone, which had a 39% equity interest in Generandes, an entity that, in turn, had a 54% equity interest in the outstanding shares of Edegel. Empresa Nacional de Electricidad S.A., or Endesa Chile, a subsidiary of Enel SpA, one of the worlds largest electricity companies, indirectly owned 29% of Edegel; the remaining shares were held publicly. Endesa Chile also owned 61% of Generandes. In September 2014, we completed the sale of our indirect equity interest in Edegel. As a result, the results of operations of Generandes (the entity through which we held our indirect equity interest in Edegel) are reflected as discontinued operations in our financial statements presented in this prospectus.
In this prospectus, we also include consolidated financial statements of Generandes as of and for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 2011, pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X. These financial statements have been audited according to U.S. GAAS, except for the financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, which are not required to be audited by Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X because Generandes is not considered a significant subsidiary of ours for the year ended December 31, 2014.
Israel Segment
The following summaries provide a description of the portfolio of assets in our Israel segment.
OPC
Our 80% stake in OPC is held indirectly through ICPI. The remaining 20% is held by Veolia, which was recently acquired by Oaktree Capital Management. In July 2013, OPC became Israels first IPP by commencing commercial operation of its power station, located in Mishor Rotem industrial zone in the south of Israel. The OPC plant was constructed for an aggregate cost of approximately $508 million. OPCs combined cycle plant has a capacity of 440 MW, representing approximately 3% of the installed capacity and approximately 34% of the installed capacity provided by IPPs in Israel as of December 31, 2014. Given Israels growing economy and the advanced age of the existing state-owned power generation facilities, we believe OPC provides us with a strategic position in the Israeli electricity market and thereby provides us with an opportunity to participate in additional power projects in Israel, which we believe may become available to private sector participants in connection with Israels growing energy industry.
OPC purchases natural gas from the Tamar Group, pursuant to a natural gas supply agreement that expires upon the earlier of June 2029 or the date on which OPC consumes the entire contractual capacity. The
163
PUAEs generation component tariff is the base for the natural gas price linkage formula in the agreement between OPC and the Tamar Group. For further information on OPCs gas supply agreement, see Fuel and TransportationNatural Gas Supply and Transportation Agreements.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, OPC generated revenue of $157 million and $413 million, respectively, representing 24% and 30% of our consolidated revenues, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, OPC generated 3,465 GWh, representing approximately 6% of the total energy demand in Israel.
The following table sets forth certain information for OPCs plant for each of the periods presented:
As of |
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||
Plant |
Installed
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
|||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||
OPC 1 |
440 | 3,465 | 90 | % | 1,357 | 96 | % |
1. | Commenced commercial operations in July 2013. |
OPC has a PPA with IEC, the government-owned electricity generation, transmission and distribution company in Israel, or the IEC PPA. The term of the IEC PPA lasts until 20 years after the power stations COD ( i.e. 20 years from July 2013). The IEC PPA is a capacity and energy agreement, committing OPC to provide the entire net available capacity of its power station to IEC and to generate power at such volumes and schedules as required by IEC. The terms of the IEC PPA allow OPC to carve out energy and capacity for direct sales to private consumers, and OPC has accordingly allocated the entire capacity of the plant to private consumers since COD. As a result, OPC supplies energy to approximately 20 end users according to long-term PPAs (generally for a minimum of 10 years). Under the IEC PPA, OPC can also elect to revert back to supplying to the IEC instead of to private customers. As of June 30, 2015, the weighted average remaining life of OPCs PPAs with end users based on firm capacity was eight years. In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, OPCs energy and capacity sales to end users represented 97% and 99% of OPCs total energy and capacity sales, respectively.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries of Japan provides the long-term servicing of the power station, for a term of 100,000 hours of operation, or 12 years based upon the expected operations of the power station, which is consistent with our strategy of entering into long-term servicing agreements with OEMs to help ensure the efficiency and productivity of our generation plants.
In March 2014, one of our subsidiaries was awarded a tender published by the Israel Land Authority to lease a plot of land adjacent to the OPC site. The plot, which is large enough to house another combined cycle or similar generation facility, may be used to expand OPCs capacity in the long-term.
We have entered, through our subsidiary ICPI, into a shareholders agreement which grants minority rights to OPCs minority shareholder. For further information on our shareholders agreements, see Shareholders Agreements and for further information on the risks related to our shareholders agreements, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our BusinessWe have granted rights to the minority shareholders of certain of our subsidiaries. For further information on the regulation of the Israeli electricity sector, see Regulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Israeli Electricity Sector.
AIE
In August 2015, we acquired 100% of the shares of AIE from Hadera Paper, a large paper and paper product manufacturer in Israel. The consideration for the transaction was NIS 60 million (approximately
164
$16 million), of which approximately NIS 24 million (approximately $6 million) was provided in the form of a loan to be converted into consideration (and considered a payment to Hadera Paper) upon the completion of Hadera Papers sale of certain equipment to us, as discussed below. AIE holds a conditional license for the construction of a 120 MW cogeneration power station in Israel. The project is in the advanced development stage and construction is expected to commence in early 2016. Based upon our initial assessment, we expect that the total cost of completing the AIE plant (including the consideration for the acquisition of AIE and the construction of the power station) will be approximately $200 million. The AIE plant is expected to reach its COD in the second half of 2018.
AIEs power plant is expected to supply the electricity and steam needs of Hadera Papers facility as well as to provide electricity to end users in Israel. The power plant will operate using natural gas and diesel oil and is expected to have a relatively high level of energy utilization due to usage of the cogeneration technology, which supplies electricity and steam in a single production process.
In June 2015, AIE entered into an agreement with Hadera Paper for AIEs supply of electricity and steam from the AIE power plant to be constructed by us to Hadera Papers facility from closing and for a period of 18 years from the date the power plant reaches its COD. Pursuant to this agreement, Hadera Paper will acquire all of its electricity and steam needs from AIE. The agreement provides for minimum quantities of steam to be purchased by Hadera Paper, which will be subject to adjustment. Until AIE reaches its COD, AIE will supply steam and electricity to Hadera Paper using its old equipment purchased.
Additionally, Hadera Paper has a gas supply agreement with the Tamar Group and a related gas transport agreement with Israel Natural Gas Lines Ltd., both of which were assigned to AIE in connection with the acquisition.
In connection with the acquisition, Hadera Paper agreed to sell certain equipment that it uses to produce steam, and approximately 25 MW of additional capacity, within its manufacturing plant to AIE on the earlier of (i) December 30, 2015 and (ii) the date AIE holds electricity generation licenses for such equipment. Until that time, AIE shall lease such equipment from Hadera Paper. AIE will also lease from Hadera Paper the land on which the power generation plant is located from the closing of the acquisition to up to 20 years from AIEs plants COD.
Central America Segment
The following summaries provide a description of the portfolio of assets in our Central America segment.
Nicaragua
ICPNH
Our operations in Nicaragua are carried out through ICPNH. We own 100% of ICPNH, which we acquired in March 2014 and which was formerly known as AEI Nicaragua. ICPNH owns and operates four power generation plants located throughout Nicaragua through its indirect (i) 65% equity interest in Corinto, (ii) 65% equity interest in Tipitapa Power, (iii) 61% equity interest in Amayo I, and (iv) 61% equity interest in Amayo II. Corinto and Tipitapa Power, which have a combined capacity of 122 MW, are powered by HFO. The Corinto and Tipitapa Power plants house fuel storage tanks on site with capacity of approximately 90 thousand barrels and 63 thousand barrels, respectively. Amayo I and Amayo II have a combined capacity of 63 MW of wind power energy. Collectively, these four entities represent a capacity of 185 MW, approximately 16% of the total capacity of the Nicaraguan interconnected system as of December 31, 2014.
165
During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, ICPNH generated revenue of $57 million and $125 million, respectively, representing 9% of our consolidated revenues, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, ICPNH generated 1,099 GWh, representing 27% of the Nicaraguan interconnected systems energy requirements. ICPNH has committed to sell its available energy, as follows:
| Corinto has commitments for 70% of its available energy in every year up to December 2018; |
| Tipitapa Power has commitments for 100% of its available energy in every year up to December 2018; |
| Amayo I has commitments for 100% of its available energy in every year up to March 2024; and |
| Amayo II has commitments for 100% of its available energy in every year up to March 2025. |
The following table sets forth certain information for ICPNHs plants for each of the periods presented:
As of June 30, |
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant |
Year of
|
Installed
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corinto |
1999 | 71 | 494 | 93 | 515 | 92 | 531 | 93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tipitapa Power |
1999 | 51 | 327 | 98 | 326 | 97 | 369 | 97 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amayo I |
2009 | 40 | 174 | 98 | 148 | 97 | 160 | 99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amayo II |
2010 | 23 | 104 | 96 | 96 | 97 | 104 | 98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
185 | 1,099 | 1,085 | 1,164 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In December 2014, ICPNHs wind farm complex in Nicaragua sustained damage in connection with a blackout in the National Interconnection System, which left one wind turbine collapsed and another two wind turbines, representing 10% of all of our installed capacity at our Amayo I and Amayo II plants, with severe damage. The three damaged turbines, which represent 10% of all of our installed capacity at our Amayo I and II plants, are in the process of being replaced, and are expected to be operational by early 2016. The contracted operator has the responsibility to replace the turbines. Between the contracted operator and our insurance provider, we expect that there will be sufficient funds to cover the replacement and business interruption costs resulting from the damaged turbines.
Guatemala
Puerto Quetzal
We own 100% of Puerto Quetzal, which represents our initial entry into the Guatemalan power generation market. Puerto Quetzal, which we acquired in September 2014, utilized three floating power barges with HFO generators, representing 234 MW, at the time of its acquisition. In November 2014, Puerto Quetzal transferred one of its three power barges, which has a capacity of 55 MW, to our Panamanian subsidiary Kanan. As a result, Puerto Quetzal now operates two power barges with an aggregate capacity of 179 MW, representing approximately 7% of the total capacity in the Guatemala interconnected system as of December 31, 2014. The Puerto Quetzal plant houses fuel storage tanks on site with capacity of approximately 200 thousand barrels.
Puerto Quetzals PPAs, representing approximately 172 MW as of December 31, 2014, with the Guatemalan distribution companies expired in April 2015, and as of the date of this prospectus have not yet been extended or replaced with one or more PPAs on comparable terms.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, Puerto Quetzal generated revenue of $60 million and $33 million, respectively, representing 9% and 2% of our consolidated revenues, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, Puerto Quetzal generated 490 GWh, representing 5% of the Guatemalan systems energy requirements.
166
The following table sets forth certain information for Puerto Quetzals plant for each of the periods presented:
As of
June 30,
|
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant |
Year of
|
Installed
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Puerto Quetzal |
1993 | 179 | 490 | 97 | 525 | 95 | 595 | 93 |
El Salvador
Nejapa
We own 100% of Nejapa in El Salvador as a result of our acquisition in January 2015 of Crystal Powers 29% stake in Nejapa for $20 million in connection with the settlement of a shareholder dispute with Crystal Power. Prior to this settlement, we owned 71% of Nejapas outstanding equity.
Nejapa owns and operates 27 diesel generators (located in a single facility) powered by HFO. Nejapa has a capacity of 140 MW, representing 9% of the total capacity of El Salvador as of December 31, 2014. The Nejapa plant houses fuel storage tanks on site with capacity of approximately 47,000 barrels. In addition, Cenérgica, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, maintains a fuel depot and marine terminal and owns three fuel storage tanks with an aggregate capacity of 240,000 barrels in Acajutla, El Salvador.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, Nejapa generated revenue of $53 million, $132 million, $135 million and $145 million, respectively, representing 8%, 10%, 15% and 25% of our consolidated revenues, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, Nejapa generated 376 GWh, representing 6% of the national interconnected electrical system of El Salvador. Nejapa has committed to sell over 50% of its available energy (in MWh) in every year up to 2017.
The following table sets forth certain information for Nejapas plant for each of the periods presented:
As of
June 30,
|
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant |
Year of
|
Installed
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nejapa |
1995 | 140 | 376 | 97 | 458 | 95 | 561 | 94 |
Panama
Kanan
We own 100% of Kanan. In October 2014, Kanan was awarded a five-year contract in connection with the Panamanian governments call for emergency bids to attempt to cover electricity shortfalls in Panama in the short-term. Kanans contract to supply energy in Panama, with a maximum contractual capacity of 86 MW, becomes effective in September 2015. To facilitate its supply of this energy, we have transferred thermal generation units, in the form of barges, from our subsidiaries Puerto Quetzal and CEPP to Kanan with a total capacity of 92 MW, which, when installed, are expected to represent 3% of the total capacity of Panama as of December 31, 2014. As a result, Kanans capacity of 92 MW will consist of (i) a 55 MW power barge transferred to Kanan by Puerto Quetzal in November 2014, and (ii) a 37 MW power barge transferred to Kanan by CEPP in November 2014. Both barges have been successfully relocated to Panama and are in the process of installation and interconnection to the power system. We expect Kanan to reach its COD by the end of 2015.
167
Other Segment
The following summaries provide a description of the portfolio of assets in our Other segment.
Bolivia
COBEE
We own 100% of COBEE. COBEE is the third largest generator of electricity in Bolivia, generating power from ten run-of-the-river hydroelectric plants in the Zongo river valley, four run-of-the-river hydroelectric plants in the Miguillas river valley, and two open-cycle natural gas powered generation turbines at a plant located in El Alto-Kenko, adjacent to La Paz, Bolivia. We own water rights in connection with our operation of COBEE. COBEE has capacity of 228 MW, representing 14% of the total capacity of Bolivia as of December 31, 2014.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, COBEE generated revenue of $22 million, $41 million, $41 million and $42 million, respectively, representing 3%, 3%, 5% and 7% of our consolidated revenues, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, COBEE generated 1,086 GWh, representing 15% of the national interconnected electrical system of Bolivias energy requirements.
The following table sets forth certain information for each of COBEEs plants for each of the periods presented:
As of
June 30,
|
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant |
Year of
|
Elevation |
Installed
|
Gross
|
Availability
|
Gross
|
Availability
|
Gross
|
Availability
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(meters) | (MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zongo Valley plants: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Zongo |
1997 | 4,264 | 11 | 9 | 99 | 8 | 98 | 10 | 98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tiquimani |
1997 | 3,889 | 9 | 11 | 99 | 11 | 99 | 13 | 99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Botijlaca |
1938 | 1 | 3,492 | 7 | 34 | 97 | 38 | 97 | 39 | 98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cutichucho |
1942 | 2 | 2,697 | 23 | 91 | 80 | 104 | 85 | 126 | 99 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Santa Rosa |
2006 | 2,572 | 18 | 84 | 98 | 82 | 96 | 76 | 92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sainani 3 |
1956 | 2,210 | 10 | 15 | 17 | 71 | 98 | 69 | 98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chururaqui |
1966 | 4 | 1,830 | 25 | 127 | 95 | 144 | 98 | 135 | 96 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harca |
1969 | 1,480 | 26 | 156 | 95 | 166 | 97 | 151 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cahua |
1974 | 1,195 | 28 | 163 | 95 | 171 | 98 | 134 | 86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Huaji |
1999 | 945 | 30 | 198 | 96 | 205 | 97 | 189 | 95 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miguillas Valley plants |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miguillas |
1931 | 4,140 | 4 | 9 | 99 | 9 | 99 | 9 | 99 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Angostura |
1936 | 5 | 3,827 | 6 | 19 | 99 | 20 | 99 | 22 | 98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Choquetanga |
1939 | 6 | 3,283 | 6 | 37 | 98 | 40 | 99 | 39 | 98 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carabuco |
1958 | 2,874 | 6 | 43 | 97 | 45 | 98 | 43 | 98 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
El Alto-Kenko 7 |
1995 | 4,050 | 19 | 90 | 93 | 46 | 87 | 103 | 96 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
228 | 1,086 | 1,160 | 1,158 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | This plant was originally commissioned with an installed capacity of 3 MW in 1938. The installed capacity of this plant was increased by 2 MW in 1941 and 4 MW in 1998. |
2. | This plant was originally commissioned with an installed capacity of 3 MW in 1942. The installed capacity of this plant was increased by 3 MW in 1943, 3 MW in 1945, 2 MW in 1958 and 15 MW in 1998. |
3. | Plant is out of service due to damages sustained as a result of landslides in March 2014. The plant, which we expect to cost approximately $5 million to repair, is expected to be operational by the end of 2015. The company maintains insurance which covers the loss of revenue as a result of property damage and business interruption for up to 12 months. |
4. | This plant was originally commissioned with an installed capacity of 15 MW in 1966. The installed capacity of this plant was increased by 15 MW in 1967. |
168
5. | This plant was originally commissioned with an installed capacity of 3 MW in 1936. The installed capacity of this plant was increased by 3 MW in 1958 and by 3 MW in 2008. |
6. | This plant was originally commissioned with an installed capacity of 3 MW in 1939. The installed capacity of this plant was increased by 6 MW in 1944. |
7. | Reflects the effective capacity of El AltoKenko, which is comprised of two open-cycle turbines. The turbines have an installed capacity of 29 MW. However, as a result of the high altitude of the turbines (which are located at 4,050 meters above sea level), the installed capacity of these turbines are de-rated, resulting in an effective capacity of 19 MW. |
Although the Government of Bolivia has nationalized entities in its power utility market, as recently as 2012, we are unaware of any steps the Government of Bolivia may take, or is currently taking, with respect to nationalizations within the Bolivian power utility market, generally, or with respect to COBEE, in particular. For further information on the risks related to the Bolivian governments nationalization of certain generation companies, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Government RegulationThe Government of Bolivia has nationalized energy industry assets, and our remaining operations in Bolivia may also be nationalized.
Chile
Central Cardones
We own 87% of Central Cardones; the remaining 13% is held by Central Cardones former controlling shareholder, South World Consulting S.A., an energy consulting and business development firm. We acquired our interest in Central Cardones in December 2011 to obtain an initial footprint in the Chilean power market. Central Cardones owns and operates one open-cycle diesel Siemens turbine located in the northern part of the SIC and was the first Chilean power facility to be included in our portfolio. Central Cardones has an installed capacity of 153 MW, representing 1% of the total installed capacity of Chile as of December 31, 2014. Central Cardones power plant is used primarily for cold reserve capacity as a peaking unit, generally operating only in extraordinary situations. Central Cardones receives revenues from its allocation of available system capacity and does not have any customers. During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, Central Cardones generated revenue of $8 million, $11 million, $11 million and $14 million, respectively, representing 1%, 1%, 1% and 2% of our consolidated revenues, respectively.
The following table sets forth certain information for Central Cardones plant for each of the periods presented:
As of
June 30,
|
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant |
Year of
|
Installed
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Central Cardones |
2009 | 153 | 0.04 | 97 | | 98 | 0.47 | 100 |
Colmito
We own 100% of Colmito. Colmito, which we acquired in September 2013, owns and operates a dual fuel open-cycle Rolls Royce aeroderivative turbine that commenced operation in August 2008. Although the Colmito plant previously operated with diesel oil as a backup for the SIC, the plant was connected to a natural gas pipeline in February 2015, and has begun to purchase natural gas on a seasonal basis to generate energy. Colmitos generation facility is located in the central part of the SIC. Colmito has an installed capacity of 58 MW, representing 0.3% of the total installed capacity of Chile as of December 31, 2014.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, Colmito generated revenue of $20 million, $38 million and $1 million, respectively, representing 3%, 4% and 0.1% of our consolidated revenues, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, Colmito generated 5.9 GWh, representing 0.01% of the SIC systems energy requirements. Colmito has committed to sell over 50% of its available energy in every year up to 2017.
169
The following table sets forth certain information for Colmitos plant for each of the periods presented:
As of
June 30,
|
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant |
Year of
|
Installed
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Colmito |
2008 | 58 | 5.9 | 95 | 46 | 91 | 1 | 98 |
Dominican Republic
CEPP
We own 97% of CEPP; the remaining 3% is held by Basic Energy LTD Bahamas. CEPP owns and operates 12 generation units powered by HFO at two plants located in Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic. The CEPP I Plant is located on land and consists of three Wartsilla V32 diesel generators burning HFO with a combined capacity of 17 MW. The CEPP II Plant generates power on a barge near the shore, which contains nine Warstilla V32 diesel generators burning HFO, that is moored at a pier adjacent to the CEPP I Plant and has capacity of 50 MW. In the third quarter of 2013, CEPP purchased second a barge with a capacity of 37 MW for $5 million. This barge contains seven engines, five with 5.5 MW of capacity and two with 5 MW of capacity. CEPP completely refurbished this barge at a total cost of $16 million, and, in November 2014, transferred this barge to our subsidiary Kanan.
Excluding the capacity associated with the newly-refurbished barge that has been transferred to Kanan, CEPP has a capacity of 67 MW, representing approximately 2% of the total capacity in the Dominican Republic as of December 31, 2014. The CEPP I Plant and the CEPP II Plant also have fuel storage tanks on-site with an aggregate storage capacity of 56,000 barrels.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, CEPP generated revenue of $20 million, $73 million, $92 million and $88 million, respectively, representing 3%, 5%, 11% and 15% of our consolidated revenues, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, CEPP generated 242 GWh, representing 2% of the national interconnected electrical system of the Dominican Republics energy requirements.
The following table sets forth certain information for each of CEPPs plants for the periods presented:
As of
June 30,
|
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant |
Year of
|
Installed
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEPP I |
1990 | 16 | 51 | 34 | 78 | 87 | 57 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CEPP II |
1994 | 51 | 191 | 42 | 261 | 87 | 280 | 83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
67 | 242 | 339 | 337 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior to September 2014, CEPP was party to two long-term PPAs, representing 75% of its capacity, with Empresa Distribuidora de Electricidad del Norte S.A., or Edenorte, and had experienced significant payment delays with respect to such PPAs. As a result, CEPPs payment cycle spanned three to six months, as compared to the typical payment cycle of our other business which spans 30 to 45 days. Notwithstanding such significant delays, which characterize Edenortes payment patterns in both the PPA and spot market in the Dominican Republic, Edenorte has historically paid its outstanding obligations, in full, including interest accrued on late payments. To finance its operating activities in light of such payment cycle, CEPP utilizes its working capital
170
line of credit with local banks. The Dominican Republic has forecasted positive economic growth, which may result in less volatility in exchange rates, and, in particular, a direct reduction in our accounts receivable. For further information on CEPPs counterparty risks, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our Business We are exposed to counterparty risks . For further information on CEPPs line of credit with financial institutions in the Dominican Republic, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMaterial IndebtednessShort-Term Loans.
Each of CEPPs PPAs expired in September 2014, and as of the date of this prospectus have not yet been extended or replaced with one or more PPAs on comparable terms. As a result, CEPP sells the previously contracted capacity under such PPAs on the spot market, at the rates dictated by such market, and subject to the aforementioned significant payment delays.
Jamaica
JPPC
We own 100% of JPPC, as a result of our purchase in May 2014 of the 84% of JPPCs outstanding equity interest that we did not own, which increased our equity interest in JPPC from 16% to 100%. JPPC owns and operates two diesel generation units burning HFO and a combined-cycle steam turbine at a plant located in Kingston, Jamaica. JPPC has capacity of 60 MW, representing approximately 6% of the total capacity of the Jamaican interconnected system as of December 31, 2014. JPPCs plant has fuel storage tanks on site with an aggregate storage capacity of 50,000 barrels.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, JPPC generated revenue of $24 million and $41 million, respectively, representing 4% and 3% of our consolidated revenues, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2014, JPPC generated 425 GWh, representing 10% of the Jamaican interconnected systems energy requirements. JPPC has committed to sell over 50% of its available energy in every year up to 2018.
The following table sets forth certain information for JPPCs plant for each of the periods presented:
As of
June 30,
|
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant |
Year of
|
Installed
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JPPC |
1998 | 60 | 425 | 85 | 447 | 88 | 438 | 88 |
Colombia
Surpetroil
We own 60% of Surpetroil, which we acquired in March 2014 and which represents our initial entry into the Colombian power generation market; the remaining 40% is owned by Yesid Gasca Duran. Surpetroil is dedicated to power generation utilizing stranded and associated natural gas reserves and operates three power plants fueled by natural gas in different parts of Colombia. Surpetroil also transports and distributes compressed natural gas within Colombia. The Surpetroil plant has a generation capacity of 15 MW, representing approximately 0.1% of the total capacity in the Colombian interconnected system as of December 31, 2014. Surpetroil has various small-scale opportunities to install additional capacity using stranded gas under development.
During the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, Surpetroil generated revenue of $4 and $9 million, respectively, representing 1% of our consolidated revenues in each of the periods.
171
During the year ended December 31, 2014, Surpetroil generated 48 GWh, and primarily provided energy to EMGESA S.A., an affiliate of Endesa Chile, via a 4 kilometer transmission line to EMGESAs El Quimbo hydroelectric project. Surpetroil has committed to sell over 50% of its available energy until October 2015.
As of
June 30,
|
Years Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant |
Year of
|
Installed
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
Gross Energy
|
Availability
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(MW) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | (GWh) | (%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
La Hocha |
2011 |
3 |
47 | 98 | 22 | 97 | 22 | 97 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purificación |
2014 | 10 | 1 | 1 1 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Entrerios |
2015 | 2 | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 48 | 22 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | As a result of gas unavailability during December 2014. |
Panama
Pedregal
We own 21% of Pedregal; of the remaining 79%, (1) 55% is held by Conduit Capital Partners, LLC, a private equity investment firm focused on the independent electric power industry in Latin America; (2) 12% is held by Burmeister & Wain Scandinavian Contractor A/S, an operating company of the Mitsui Group; and (3) 11% is held by The Industrialization Fund for Developing Countries, a fund focusing on promoting economic activities in developing countries. Although Pedregal is located in Central America, it is not included as part of our Central America segment because we do not consolidate its results in our income statement, but account for our investment in Pedregal under the equity method, recording our share in income of associated companies.
Pedregal owns and operates three generation units powered by HFO at a plant located in Pacora, Panama. Although we have a non-controlling interest in Pedregal, Pedregal has entered into a management services agreement with our wholly-owned subsidiary Inkia Panama Management that expires in October 2016. Under this agreement, Inkia Panama Management has been designated as the administrator responsible for day-to-day management of Pedregal. Pedregal has an installed capacity of 54 MW, representing approximately 2% of the total installed capacity in the Panamanian interconnected system as of December 31, 2014. Pedregals plant also has fuel storage tanks on site with an aggregate storage capacity of 51,402 barrels.
During the year ended December 31, 2014, Pedregal generated 404 GWh, representing 4% of the Panamanian interconnected systems energy requirements. Pedregal has committed to sell over 50% of its available energy in 2015 and 2016.
Potential Projects
We are constantly monitoring and considering development and acquisition opportunities and are currently assessing 30 projects in Israel and various Latin American countries, such as Chile, Colombia, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru, Panama, the Dominican Republic, and Nicaragua. These potential projects range in size from small-scale power facilities ( e.g. , less than 40 MW) to large-scale power facilities ( e.g. , approximately 550 MW) and utilize different fuels and technologies, including natural gas, hydroelectric, wind, and stranded gas. In some instances, we have acquired land, secured necessary licenses or rights, including temporary concessions and water rights, commissioned studies, made bids, or initiated similar actions, in connection with our assessment of the viability of the relevant project. We are also considering acquiring companies and assets in power generation and related businesses ( e.g. , transmission and distribution companies or assets).
172
In addition to the Latin American opportunities that we are currently considering, we also monitor opportunities in other markets. For example, in August 2015, we acquired 100% of the shares of AIE from Hadera Paper for NIS 60 million (approximately $16 million). AIE holds a provisional license for the construction of a 120 MW cogeneration power station in Israel and will seek regulatory approval for licenses in respect of an additional 25 MW. The project is in the advanced development stage, construction is expected to commence in early 2016, and the AIE plant is expected to reach its COD in the second half of 2018. Based upon our initial assessment, we expect that the total cost of completing the AIE plant (including the consideration for the acquisition of AIE) will be approximately $200 million.
Set forth below is a map summarizing certain of the markets and projects that we have identified for potential expansion. Development projects imply a high degree of uncertainty, and there is no guarantee that we will proceed with these projects. Ultimately, notwithstanding the number of opportunities that we may consider over the long- and short-terms, we will only pursue those projects that we believe will generate attractive, risk-adjusted returns over the long-term and which we believe we have the management capacity to build and operate. In addition, in some cases, we may not obtain the relevant approval to develop a project. Furthermore, in many cases, we will need to win tenders, obtain additional rights, permits, licenses, land purchases and water rights and may need to negotiate with counterparties or conduct valuations and environmental studies, each of which could take years to satisfy, or may not be satisfied at all. The summary below sets forth projects developed and owned by us, as well as projects owned by third parties, that we may be able to acquire by direct negotiations or through tender processes. This summary is not exhaustive, is only provided to show projects which we are evaluating, and should not serve as an indication of any expectation regarding any final outcome:
173
Chile
We believe that Chile is one of the most attractive power markets in Latin America, as it is characterized by a highly-efficient and investor-friendly model with a stable regulatory framework, electricity demand growth and prices which are among the highest in the region.
We are constantly monitoring and assessing opportunities in Chile and, specifically, in the SIC system. Our acquisitions of Colmito and Central Cardones provide us with the initial footprint from which to carry out our organic development strategy in this key market. Currently, we have identified opportunities in the thermal and renewables segments. In the thermal segment, we have already acquired lands and a 50-year land concession from the government on which we may develop thermal projects representing an installed capacity of 1,890 MW. In the renewables segment, we are currently analyzing potential opportunities in the hydroelectric, wind and solar sectors. Chile represents one of the most attractive markets in Latin America, but historically it has also been one of the most challenging markets in Latin America in which to obtain environmental permits. As such, opportunities may take time to materialize.
Israel
Following recent government initiatives encouraging investments in the Israeli power generation market, the entrance of private developers has opened the door for a range of opportunities. We believe the OPC plant, the first IPP in the country, provides us with a first-movers advantage to further expand our presence in this fast growing, but stable market. In August 2015, we acquired 100% of the shares of AIE from Hadera Paper, with the intention of developing a 120 MW cogeneration plant and seeking regulatory approval for licenses in respect of an additional 25 MW.
In addition, we acquired an additional plot of land adjacent to OPC, which is large enough to house another combined cycle or similar generation facility to expand OPCs capacity in the long-term, amongst other potential opportunities.
Mexico
Mexico is enjoying strong momentum in the energy and infrastructure sectors following market reforms in 2013 and 2014. The reform of the electricity sector has driven, and is expected to continue to drive, significant investments in new generation capacity. As an example, in 2015, the CFE expects to grant concessions to construct approximately 7.0 GW of additional capacity, of which 3.2 GW is expected to be awarded to independent power producers. In addition, PEMEX has announced that it aims to reach an installed capacity of approximately 3.1 GW in the medium-term by partnering with power companies for the development of cogeneration plants. The Mexican government has also announced initiatives towards the development of significant renewable energy capacity, seeking to add approximately 4.6 GW of wind capacity over the next decade. Given the markets expected growth, strong demand and stability, we have decided to open an office in Mexico which is fully dedicated to the sourcing of opportunities and we hope to materialize prospects in the short to medium term as a result of these efforts. Currently, we are participating in a process which may provide us with the ability to build a power plant with a potential capacity approximately 210 MW.
Colombia
Colombias investment grade status, high growth and mature regulatory framework make Colombia similar to Peru and one of the main target countries within our strategic plan. Factors such as the attractive niche of stranded gas reserves and the proximity of such reserves to industrial areas create an appealing opportunity for us. For these reasons, our recent strategic acquisition of a 60% equity interest in Surpetroil, a company that utilizes stranded natural gas reserves, serves as an important entry point into the Colombian market. By having a local presence in the market, we have been able to identify new opportunities, such as a large project portfolio of small-scale stranded gas and mini-hydros, that we are currently pursuing.
174
Peru
Peru, our current core market, represents an attractive geography for further expansion, especially in the hydro segment. Peru has one of the fastest growing economies in Latin America, with a strong outlook for power demand coupled with a mature regulatory framework and a well-run power system. For these reasons, Peru remains a key growth focus for us and we have several opportunities under various states of development in this country. In the hydro segment, we have secured land and are pursuing environmental approval for two hydroelectric projects with a combined capacity of approximately 550 MW. In addition to hydro, we have also identified other opportunities such as two cold reserve projects in the thermal segment. We believe our strong presence in the Peruvian market gives us a competitive advantage at the time of materializing opportunities, helping us to identify and assess new developments in advance of other market participants.
In addition, we may pursue opportunities to expand the installed capacity of our existing operating assets and assets in advanced stages of construction in Peru. For example, the Samay I plant, which, as of September 30, 2015, was 91% constructed, will operate as a cold reserve plant with diesel and is expected to have an installed capacity of 600 MW upon its COD in mid-2016. Once natural gas becomes available to the facility through the Gasoducto Sur Peruano (which the pipelines developers are obligated to complete by 2018), the Samay I plant will operate as a natural gas-fired power plant and will be able to do so without us making any additional investments in Samay Is facilities. When fueled by natural gas, the Samay I plant will have an installed capacity of 720 MW. Finally, following an additional investment in the conversion of the Samay I plant, which we have not committed to make, the Samay I plant could operate as a combined cycle thermoelectric plant, which would increase Samay Is installed capacity to approximately 1,080 MW.
Furthermore, we may pursue opportunities to increase the installed capacity of the Las Flores plant, which has the environmental approvals and a permit to increase its installed capacity through the construction of a 190 MW gas-fired expansion. In addition, Las Flores has sufficient space to locate a combined-cycle expansion on its existing premises. Following the gas-powered expansion and an additional investment in the conversion of the Las Flores plant, neither of which we have committed to do, the Las Flores plant could operate as a combined cycle thermoelectric plant, reflecting an increase in capacity by 400 MW from 193 MW to 593 MW.
We apply a disciplined approach to evaluating and pursuing any development projects. First, we endeavor to construct projects by entering into turnkey EPC agreements that define the total project cost and transfer significant part of the risks of construction delays and cost overruns to our EPC contractors. Second, we seek to secure a revenue stream as early as possible in the development process of our plants by sourcing and entering into long-term PPAs, which provide our development projects with verifiable projected margins and cash flows before construction has commenced. Finally, we leverage our EPC contracts and PPAs to secure long-term project financing agreements which are generally stand-alone, secured, project-specific and with no or limited recourse. We have not entered into EPC agreements, PPAs or financing agreements in connection with these potential projects.
Our Customers
Our customers include governments, local distribution companies, and/or non-regulated consumers, depending upon the operating company and the particular country of operation. Our operating companies seek to enter into long-term PPAs with power purchasers. In the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014, we made 88% and 92%, respectively, of our aggregate energy sales (in GWh) pursuant to long-term PPAs. As of June 30, 2015, the majority of our PPAs were indexed to the price of the corresponding power plants operating fuel prices in U.S. Dollar; additionally, as of June 30, 2015, many of our PPAs were linked to, or provided for payment in, the U.S. Dollar, generally limiting our exposure to fuel price and exchange rate fluctuations. The majority of our capacity has been contracted for sale under long-term agreements. For example, in 2014, Kallpa had 61 long-term PPAs with various distribution companies and non-regulated clients (which accounts for most of its current generation capacity) and Kallpa has committed to sell over 50% of its available energy in every year through 2021.
175
In attempting to limit the effects of counterparty risks, each of our operating companies analyzes the creditworthiness and financial strengths of its various counterparties during the PPA negotiations as well as during the life of the agreement. Where the creditworthiness of the power purchaser is deemed to be below standard, various contractual agreements and structures are negotiated (such as letters of credit, liquidity facilities, and government guarantees) to provide the credit support. As of June 30, 2015, the weighted average remaining life of our PPAs based on firm capacity was 10 years (including the remaining life of the PPAs for our assets in advanced stages of construction).
Under the terms of the majority of our PPAs, the power purchaser is contractually obligated to purchase its energy requirements, and sometimes capacity and/or ancillary services, from the power generator based upon a base price (denominated in the applicable local currency) that is generally adjusted for a combination of some of the following: (1) fluctuations in exchange rates, (2) the U.S. inflation index, (3) a local inflation index, (4) fluctuations in the cost of operating fuel, (5) supply costs of natural gas, and (6) transmission costs. Additionally, in Peru, PPAs include provisions that change the contractual unitary energy prices in the case of an interruption of the supply or transportation of natural gas through the use of a methodology based on spot prices existing on the dates in which the interruption event occurred. Many of the prices in our PPAs differentiate between peak and off-peak periods. Utilizing PPAs allows our operating companies to lock in prices and increases our earnings stability.
176
The following table sets forth a summary of our significant PPAs as of June 30, 2015 1 :
Company | Principal Customer | Commencement | Expiration |
Contracted
Capacity 2 |
||||||
(MW) | ||||||||||
Operating Companies and Associated Company | ||||||||||
Peru Segment |
||||||||||
Kallpa |
Edelnor S.A.A., Luz del Sur S.A.A., Hidrandina S.A., Edecañete S.A., Electro Sur Este S.A.A., Sociedad Eléctrica del Sur Oeste, S.A. 3 | January 2014 | December 2021 | 350 | ||||||
Edelnor S.A.A., Luz del Sur S.A.A., Hidrandina S.A., Electro Sur Este S.A.A., Sociedad Electríca de Sur Oeste S.A., Electrosur S.A. 4 | January 2014 | December 2023 | 210 | |||||||
Sociedad Minera Cerro Verde S.A.A. 5 | January 2011 | December 2020 | 140 | |||||||
Southern Perú Copper Corporation | April 2017 | April 2027 | 120 | |||||||
Compañía Minera Antapaccay S.A. 6 | November 2011 | April 2021 | 100 | |||||||
Israel Segment |
||||||||||
OPC 7 |
PPA with Israel Electric Corporation 8 | July 2013 | June 2032 | 438 | ||||||
Central America Segment |
||||||||||
Corinto |
Distribuidora de Electricidad del Norte S.A., Distribuidora de Electricidad del Sur S.A. | June 1999 | December 2018 | 50 | ||||||
Tipitapa Power |
Distribuidora de Electricidad del Norte S.A., | |||||||||
Distribuidora de Electricidad del Sur S.A. | April 1999 | December 2018 | 51 | |||||||
Amayo I and Amayo II |
Distribuidora de Electricidad del Norte S.A., Distribuidora de Electricidad del Sur S.A. |
March 2009 | March 2024 | 40 | ||||||
Distribuidora de Electricidad del Norte S.A., Distribuidora de Electricidad del Sur S.A. | March 2010 | March 2025 | 23 | |||||||
Nejapa |
Seven distribution companies | August 2013 | January 2018 | 71 | ||||||
Seven distribution companies | August 2013 | July 2017 | 39 | |||||||
Other Segment |
||||||||||
COBEE 9 |
Minera San Cristóbal | December 2008 | October 2017 | 43 | ||||||
Colmito |
ENAP Refinerías S.A. | January 2014 | December 2017 | 35 | ||||||
JPPC |
Jamaica Public Services Company | January 1998 | January 2018 | 60 | ||||||
Surpetroil |
PETROSUD | March 2015 | June 2018 | 2-3 | ||||||
Pedregal |
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica Metro-Oeste, S.A. | February 2013 | December 2016 | 0-33 | ||||||
Elektra Noreste, S.A. | February 2013 | December 2016 | 0-19 | |||||||
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica Chiriqui, S.A. | February 2013 | December 2016 | 0-15 | |||||||
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica Metro-Oeste, S.A. | January 2014 | December 2016 | 0-24 | |||||||
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica Chiriqui, S.A. | January 2014 | December 2016 | 0-9 | |||||||
Elektra Noreste, S.A. | January 2014 | December 2016 | 0-14 | |||||||
Assets in Advanced Stages of Construction | ||||||||||
CDA |
ElectroPerú | 2016 10 | 2030 | 200 | ||||||
Luz del Sur S.A.A., Edelnor S.A.A., Edecañete S.A.A. 11 |
January 2018 | December 2027 | 202 | |||||||
Samay I |
Peruvian Investment Promotion Agency |
May 2016 | April 2035 | 600 | ||||||
Kanan |
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica Chiriqui (EDECHI) |
November 2015 | November 2020 | 7 | ||||||
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica Elektra Nor Este S.A. (ENSA) | November 2015 | November 2020 | 34 | |||||||
Empresa de Distribución Eléctrica Metro Oeste S.A. (EDEMET) | November 2015 | November 2020 | 45 |
1. | Many of our PPAs, excluding OPCs PPAs, provide for payment in, or are linked to, the U.S. Dollar. The majority of our PPAs are indexed to the price of the corresponding power plants operating fuel prices in U.S. Dollars. Although OPCs PPAs are not linked to the U.S. Dollar, IEC, who has contracted to purchase all of OPCs energy and capacity, purchases its gas pursuant to an agreement which, as a result of a number of other factors, ties IECs gas purchases to the U.S. Dollar. |
177
2. | Where a range is presented, contracted capacity varies monthly for the duration of the PPA. |
3. | Kallpa executed 14 PPAs, two PPAs with each of the following seven entities: (i) Edelnor S.A.A., (ii) Luz del Sur S.A.A., (iii) Edecañete S.A., (iv) Electrosur S.A., (v) Electro Sur Este S.A.A., (vi) Sociedad Eléctrica del Sur Oeste S.A. and (vii) Electro Puno S.A.A. Each of Electrosur S.A. and Electro Puno S.A.A. assigned their PPAs to Hidrandina S.A. in August 2012 and in October 2012, respectively. The 350 MW capacity represents the aggregate contracted capacity among these 14 PPAs. |
4. | Kallpa executed 12 PPAs, two PPAs with each of the following six entities: (i) Edelnor S.A.A., (ii) Luz del Sur S.A.A., (iii) Electrosur S.A., (iv) Electro Sur Este S.A.A., (v) Electro Puno S.A.A. and (vi) Sociedad Eléctrica del Sur Oeste S.A. Electro Puno S.A.A. assigned its PPAs to Hidrandina S.A. in October 2012. The 210 MW capacity represents the aggregate contracted capacity among these 12 PPAs. |
5. | A subsidiary of Freeport McMoRan, Inc. |
6. | A subsidiary of Glencore Xstrata. |
7. | OPCs PPAs provide for payment in New Israeli Shekels. |
8. | The terms of the IEC PPA provide OPC with the option to allocate and sell the generated electricity of the power station directly to end users. OPC has exercised this option and sells its energy and capacity directly to 23 end users as of June 30, 2015 (22 end users as of December 31, 2014), who primarily consist of Israeli industrial companies, such as Oil Refineries Limited and Granit Group. OPC has entered into PPAs with end users which cover a range of 5 MW to 107 MW of capacity, with each PPA covering, on average, 28 MW of capacity. As of June 30, 2015, the weighted average remaining life of OPCs PPAs with end users based on firm capacity is eight years. For further information on the IEC PPA, see Regulatory, Environmental and Compliance MattersRegulation of the Israeli Electricity Sector. |
9. | In December 2011, the Bolivian government amended the applicable law to prohibit generation companies from entering into new PPAs. As a result, COBEE will be unable to extend or replace its current PPA, under which it has contracted 19% of its capacity, when it expires in October 2017. For further information on risks related on our inability to renew, enter into, or replace long-term PPAs, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our BusinessWe may not be able to enter into, or renew existing, long-term contracts for the sale of energy and capacity, contracts which reduce volatility in our results of operations . |
10. | Subject to an adjustment in connection with a delay in the completion of the CDA plants construction. |
11. | Represents capacity under three separate PPAs. |
Fuel and Transportation
Our power facilities utilize natural gas, hydroelectric, HFO, diesel or wind. The price, availability and other purchase conditions of these materials (other than wind and water for hydroelectricity) depend upon the specific fuel and the market in which the fuel is purchased.
Kallpa and OPC, holders of our largest assets, are party to several long-term supply agreements, including natural gas supply agreements and transportation services agreements that are material to their operations. Colmito receives its natural gas through a similar supply agreement. While Nejapa and CEPP purchase the HFO necessary for their operations in the El Salvador and Dominican spot markets, respectively, JPPC, Corinto, Tipitapa Power and Puerto Quetzal purchase the HFO necessary for their operations from several fuel suppliers in connection with long-term supply agreements. Central Cardones purchases the diesel fuel necessary for its operations from a fuel supplier in connection with a similar agreement. The sole provider of natural gas in Bolivia is a government-owned company with which COBEE has a long-term supply agreement. The prices for transmission and delivery of natural gas to COBEE are set by government decree.
Natural Gas Supply and Transportation Agreements
Kallpa purchases its natural gas requirements for its generation facilities from the Camisea Consortium, pursuant to a natural gas exclusive supply agreement dated December 6, 2005, as amended. Under this agreement, the Camisea Consortium has agreed to supply Kallpas natural gas requirements, subject to a daily maximum amount, and Kallpa has agreed to acquire natural gas exclusively from the Camisea Consortium. The Camisea Consortium is obligated to provide a maximum of 4.3 million cubic meters of natural gas per day to the Kallpa facility and Kallpa is obligated to purchase a minimum of 2.2 million cubic meters of natural gas per day. Should Kallpa fail to consume the contractual minimum volume, it would still be obliged to pay for the minimum daily volume, but may make up the consumption volume shortage on any day during the following 18 months. The price that Kallpa pays the Camisea Consortium for the natural gas supplied is based upon a base price in U.S. dollars set on the date of the agreement, indexed each year based on two producer price indices: Fuels and Related Products Power Index and Oil Field and Gas Field Machinery Index, with discounts available based on the volume of natural gas consumed. This price, before discounts, is the same
178
for all generation companies purchasing gas from the Camisea Consortium. The average total delivered natural gas price for the year ended December 31, 2014 was $3.15 / MMBTU. This agreement expires in June 2022. For information on the risks related to Kallpas inability to renew, extend or replace this agreement prior to its expiration, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our BusinessSupplier concentration may expose us to significant financial credit or performance risk, particularly with respect to those agreements which may expire during the life of our power plants .
Kallpas natural gas transportation services are rendered by TGP pursuant to a natural gas firm transportation agreement dated December 2007, as amended, and an interruptible gas transportation agreement dated December 6, 2005, as amended. Both agreements expire in December 2033. In April 2014, in connection with our acquisition of the Las Flores plant, the natural gas firm transportation agreement was further modified to include the transportation agreement between Duke Energy Egenor S. en C. por A. and TGP for Las Flores. Additionally, on April 1, 2014, Kallpa entered into an agreement with TGP to cover the period up to the completion of the expansion of TGPs pipeline facilities. Pursuant to this agreement, TGP is obligated to transport up to 120,679 cubic meters of natural gas per day from the Camisea Consortiums delivery point located at the Camisea natural gas fields to the Kallpa facilities. Pursuant to the terms of each of these agreements, Kallpa pays a regulated tariff approved by the OSINERGMIN.
Additionally, Kallpa is party to two additional gas transportation agreements, to become effective at the completion of the expansion of TGPs pipeline facilities (which is expected to occur between March 2016 and September 2016). Pursuant to these agreements, TGP will be obligated to transport up to 565,130 cubic meters of natural gas per day and 935,000 cubic meters of natural gas per day, respectively, from the Camisea Consortiums delivery point located at the Camisea natural gas fields to the Kallpa facility, subject to the availability of the necessary capacity in TGPs pipelines. These agreements expire in March 2030 and December 2033, respectively.
Set forth below is a summary of the natural gas transportation services under each of the two agreements:
Periods |
Firm |
Interruptible |
||
Initial Date of Dispatch |
3,474,861 | 1,329,593 | ||
Initial Date of Dispatch - 3/20/20 |
4,854,312 | 764,463 | ||
3/20/20 - 1/1/21 |
4,655,000 | 764,463 | ||
1/2/21 - 3/31/30 |
4,655,000 | 530,000 | ||
4/1/30 - 3/31/33 |
3,883,831 | 1,301,169 | ||
4/1/33 - 12/31/33 |
2,948,831 | 1,301,169 |
OPC purchases natural gas from the Tamar Group, pursuant to a natural gas supply agreement dated November 2012. Under this agreement, the Tamar Group has agreed to supply OPCs natural gas requirements, subject to a contractual maximum amount of 10.6 billion cubic meters. The price that OPC pays to the Tamar Group for the natural gas supplied is based upon a base price in New Israeli Shekels set on the date of the agreement, indexed to changes in the Production Cost tariff, which is part of the Time of Use tariff and the USD representative exchange rate. The agreement includes a floor mechanism with respect to prices for the gas, expressed in USD, where such floor prices shall enter into force upon six consecutive months where the contract price is below the previous floor. As a result of previous declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, OPC will begin to pay the ultimate floor price set forth in its supply agreement in November 2015. For information on the risks associated with the indexation to the PUAEs generation tariff on OPCs supply agreement with the Tamar Group, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Government RegulationThe production and profitability of IPPs in Israel may be adversely affected by changes in Israels regulatory environment.
OPCs agreement with the Tamar Group expires upon the earlier of June 2029 or the date on which OPC consumes the entire contractual capacity. This agreement remains subject to approval by Israels Antitrust Authority, although performance under this contract has begun under temporary relief.
179
OPCs agreement with the Tamar Group provides for the curtailment of OPCs gas supply in the event of insufficient gas supply, and notes that certain other Tamar Group customers have priority over OPC for supply and may therefore not be curtailed even if OPC were curtailed. However, in December 2012, the Israeli Natural Gas Council issued Resolution No. 6/2012, or the Gas Authority Resolution, with respect to the regulation of the usage of capacity of the natural gas pipeline from the Tamar rig in case of a shortage of capacity of the gas pipeline, and such regulation differs from the provision included in OPCs agreement with the Tamar Group. We believe that the pro-rata mechanism stipulated in the Gas Authority Resolution may increase the gas volume delivered to OPC pursuant to OPCs agreement with the Tamar Group in the event of gas pipeline capacity shortages. The manner in which the Gas Authority Resolution would be implemented, if at all and, if implemented, its potential effect on OPCs agreement with the Tamar Group, if any, remains unknown.
The Tamar Group has, in the past, worked on the expansion of the transmission capacity of natural gas from the Tamar gas field, which expansion will eventually increase the pipeline capacity from the platform to the shore, and to the transmission system. However, following delays in the Israeli Anti-Trust Authoritys approval of, among others, Noble, a part owner and the operator of the Tamar lease as a result of Nobles cross holdings in additional gas fields (primarily the Leviathan gas field), Noble announced that it was suspending all of its projects in Israel, including the Tamar expansion project, until all regulatory issues were resolved. On August 16, 2015, a revised natural gas framework arrangement between the Tamar Group, the Leviathan group, and the Israeli government was approved by the Israeli government. Pursuant to such arrangement, new IPPs may now, among other things, select to purchase gas at a base price which reflects the average price paid by the three major conventional IPPsDorad, Dalia and OPC. Additional sections of this arrangement remain subject to further approvals, including approvals in accordance with the Israeli Anti-Trust Law, and the receipt of such approvals has been postponed a number of times. Once such approvals have been received, Noble is expected to continue with the Tamar expansion project (together with the Tamar Group) and the development of the Leviathan field (together with the Leviathan group). In the event that the Tamar expansion project is not completed, the possible result could be a lack of pipeline capacity in the future, which could result in the curtailment of OPCs gas supply.
HFO and Diesel Supply
Our operating companies that rely on HFO and diesel obtain their supply of HFO and diesel either through acquisitions on the spot market or pursuant to short- to medium-term supply agreements. The supply agreements that our operating companies enter into for HFO and diesel are generally linked to the Platts, McGraw Hill Index.
Our Competition
Our major competitors in the Latin American and Caribbean countries in which we operate are generally the large international power utility corporations operating in these countries. Local competitors also exist in each of these countries and account for varying market shares, depending upon the country of interest. Within Israel, our major competitors are IEC, Dorad Energy Ltd., and other IPPs who, as a result of recent government initiatives encouraging investments in the Israeli power generation market, are constructing power stations with significant capacity. Some of our foreign competitors are substantially larger and have substantially greater resources than our Company.
Set forth below is a discussion of competition in certain of our markets of operation.
Peru
In Peru, power generation companies compete along a number of dimensions, including the ability to (1) source and enter into long-term PPAs with power purchases, (2) source and secure land for the development or expansion of additional power generation plants, (3) source and secure natural gas to fuel power generation
180
stations, (4) win tenders by the Peruvian government to build cold, or other generation supply, reserve plants, and (5) maintain or increase market share in the growing Peruvian electricity market, particularly in connection with the balance of energy supply and demand within Peru. In Peru, we compete with large international and domestic generators as well as with state-owned electricity generators, although their relative weight in the market has been diminishing over time since the privatization process started in the 1990s.
The following table sets forth the quantity of energy generated by each of the principal generation companies in Peru for the periods presented:
Gross Energy Generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa Generación S.A. |
5,920 | 14.17 | 5,459 | 13.76 | 4,282 | 11.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Edegel 1 (a subsidiary of Enel) |
8,848 | 21.17 | 8,700 | 21.93 | 8,837 | 23.68 | ||||||||||||||||||
EnerSur S.A. (a subsidiary of GDF Suez S.A.) |
7,098 | 16.98 | 7,719 | 19.46 | 5,782 | 15.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
ElectroPerú S.A. (a state-owned generation company) |
7,041 | 16.85 | 7,272 | 18.33 | 7,352 | 19.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Duke Energy Egenor S. en C. por A 2 (a subsidiary of Duke Energy Corp) |
2,534 | 6.06 | 2,727 | 6.87 | 3,532 | 9.46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other generation companies |
10,351 | 24.77 | 7,793 | 19.65 | 7,534 | 20.19 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
41,792 | 100.0 | 39,670 | 100.0 | 37,319 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. | Includes Edegel and Chinango S.A.C. |
2. | Includes Egenor and Termoselva S.R.L. |
Israel
Until OPC commenced commercial operations in July 2013, IEC operated as the sole large-scale provider of electricity in Israel. In May 2014, Dorad Energy Ltd. became the second IPP to commence commercial operations in Israel, adding a capacity of 860 MW to the Israeli electric market. In July 2015, the first of two units of the power plant of Dalia Power Energies commenced commercial operations. In September 2015, the second unit reached its COD, adding, together with the first unit, 910 MW to the Israeli electric market. Several other IPPs are in the process of constructing power plants, and are expected to commence commercial operations in the coming years. As of the date of this prospectus, IEC does not publish generation and energy and capacity sales information for IPPs.
Nicaragua
The electricity market in Nicaragua is served by a variety of generation companies, including (1) ICPNH, (2) ALBA de Nicaragua, S.A. (ALBANISA), (3) PENSA Proyecto Eléctrico de Nicaragua, S.A, (4) Enel SpA and Generadora de Occidente, Ltda. ICPNH competes with each of these companies for the right to supply capacity and energy to distribution companies and other unregulated customers as well as exports to SIEPAC.
181
The following table sets forth the quantity of energy generated by each of the principal generation companies in Nicaragua for the periods presented:
Gross Energy Generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||
ICPNH |
1,099 | 26.71 | 1,085 | 28.03 | 1,164 | 31.52 | ||||||||||||||||||
ALBA de Nicaragua, S.A. (ALBANISA) |
745 | 18.11 | 535 | 13.82 | 646 | 17.49 | ||||||||||||||||||
PENSA Proyecto Eléctrico de Nicaragua, S.A. |
430 | 10.45 | 424 | 10.95 | 300 | 8.12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Enel SpA |
354 | 8.60 | 435 | 11.23 | 436 | 11.81 | ||||||||||||||||||
Generadora de Occidente, Ltda. |
266 | 6.47 | 258 | 6.66 | 383 | 10.37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other generation companies |
1,220 | 29.65 | 1,134 | 29.29 | 765 | 20.71 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
4,114 | 100.0 | 3,871 | 100.0 | 3,693 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guatemala
The electricity market in Guatemala is served by a variety of generation companies, including (1) PQP, (2) El Instituto Nacional de Electrificación (Inde), (3) Energías San José S.A., and (4) Duke Energy Guatemala y Cia, S.C.A. Puerto Quetzal competes with each of these companies for the right to supply capacity and energy to distribution companies and other unregulated customers, as well as ancillary services to the grid. In addition, Puerto Quetzal competes directly, or through its trading arm Poliwatt Limitada, for the export of energy and capacity to various countries in SIEPAC.
The following table sets forth the quantity of energy generated by each of the principal generation companies in Guatemala for the periods presented:
Gross Energy Generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||
PQP |
490 | 4.67 | 514 | 5.38 | 577 | 6.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
El Instituto Nacional de Electrificación (Inde) |
3,159 | 30.09 | 2,763 | 28.91 | 2,770 | 30.75 | ||||||||||||||||||
Energías San José, S. A. |
970 | 9.24 | 916 | 9.58 | 864 | 9.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Duke Energy Guatemala y CIA, S. C. A. |
872 | 8.31 | 905 | 9.47 | 680 | 7.55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other generation companies |
5,007 | 47.69 | 4,460 | 46.66 | 4,116 | 45.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
10,498 | 100.0 | 9,558 | 100.0 | 9,007 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Salvador
The electricity market in El Salvador is served by a variety of generation companies, including (1) Nejapa, (2) Comisión Ejecutiva Hidroeléctrica del Río Lempa, a state-owned generation company whose primary generation facilities are hydroelectric plants, (3) LaGeo S.A. de C.V., a state-owned generation company whose primary generation facilities are geothermal plants, (4) Duke Energy International, a subsidiary of Duke Energy Corp., (5) Inversiones Energéticas, S.A. de C.V., and (6) Termopuerto, S.A. de C.V. Nejapa competes with each of these companies for the right to supply capacity and energy to distribution companies and other unregulated customers, as well as for exports to SIEPAC.
182
The following table sets forth the quantity of energy generated by each of the principal generation companies in El Salvador for the periods presented:
Gross Energy Generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||
Nejapa |
376 | 6.08 | 458 | 7.37 | 561 | 9.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comisión Ejecutiva Hidroeléctrica del Río Lempa |
1,718 | 27.76 | 1,790 | 28.81 | 1,847 | 29.61 | ||||||||||||||||||
LaGeo S.A. de C.V. |
1,558 | 25.17 | 1,560 | 25.11 | 1,535 | 24.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
Duke Energy International |
821 | 13.26 | 826 | 13.29 | 891 | 14.29 | ||||||||||||||||||
Inversiones Energéticas, S.A. de C.V. |
574 | 9.27 | 599 | 9.64 | 677 | 10.86 | ||||||||||||||||||
Termopuerto, S.A. de C.V. |
476 | 7.69 | 303 | 4.88 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other generation companies |
667 | 10.77 | 677 | 10.90 | 724 | 11.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
6,188 | 100.0 | 6,211 | 100.0 | 6,236 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Panama
The electricity market in Panama is served by a variety of generation companies, including (1) Pedregal, (2) ACP, (3) AES Panamá, S.R.L, (4) Celsia SA ESP and (5) Enel Fortuna, S.A. Pedregal competes with each of these companies for the right to supply capacity and energy to distribution companies and other unregulated customers, as well as for exports to SIEPAC.
The following table sets forth the quantity of energy generated by each of the principal generation companies in Panama for the periods presented:
Gross Energy Generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||
Pedregal |
405 | 4.40 | 420 | 4.79 | 385 | 4.58 | ||||||||||||||||||
ACP |
1,029 | 11.18 | 551 | 6.28 | 518 | 6.18 | ||||||||||||||||||
AES Panamá, S.R.L. |
1,993 | 21.66 | 2,160 | 24.63 | 2,479 | 29.55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Celsia SA ESP |
1,565 | 17.00 | 1,750 | 19.95 | 1,508 | 17.97 | ||||||||||||||||||
Enel Fortuna, S.A |
1,130 | 12.28 | 1,224 | 13.96 | 1,665 | 19.85 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other hydros |
1,473 | 16.00 | 1,191 | 13.58 | 803 | 9.57 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other thermal |
1,311 | 14.25 | 1,408 | 16.05 | 1,015 | 12.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
Solar & wind |
189 | 2.05 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
EOR |
108 | 1.17 | 68 | 0.78 | 17 | 0.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
9,203 | 100.0 | 8,772 | 100.0 | 8,390 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bolivia
The electricity market in Bolivia is primarily served by a variety of generation companies, including COBEE, Guaracachi, Valle Hermoso and Corani. Prior to May 2010, Guaracachi was a subsidiary of Rurelec Plc, Valle Hermoso was a subsidiary of the Bolivian Generating Group, and Corani was a subsidiary of GDF Suez. In May 2010, the Bolivian government nationalized each of these generation companies and began negotiations with the owners of these generation companies with respect to the compensation to be paid for these
183
assets. In October 2011, the Bolivian government reached compensation settlements related to the nationalization of Valle Hermoso and Corani, and in 2014, reached compensation settlements related to the nationalization of Guaracachi.
The following table sets forth the quantity of energy generated by each of the principal generation companies in Bolivia for the periods presented:
Gross Energy Generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||
COBEE |
1,086 | 13.86 | 1,160 | 15.17 | 1,158 | 16.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Guaracachi |
2,078 | 26.52 | 2,104 | 28.63 | 1,937 | 27.91 | ||||||||||||||||||
Valle Hermoso |
1,457 | 18.59 | 1,318 | 17.94 | 1,272 | 18.33 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corani |
923 | 11.78 | 930 | 12.66 | 811 | 11.69 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other generation companies |
2,292 | 29.25 | 1,836 | 24.99 | 1,762 | 25.39 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
7,837 | 100.0 | 7,348 | 100.0 | 6,939 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chile (SIC)
The electricity market in Chile is served by a variety of generation companies, including (1) Central Cardones, (2) Colmito, (3) Endesa and (4) Colbún. We compete in the SIC system, Chiles largest power system, with each of these companies for the right to supply capacity and energy to distribution companies and other unregulated customers. A transmission line is under construction to connect the SIC with SING, Chiles second largest power system. Once completed, we also expect to compete with power plants in the SING system.
The following table sets forth the quantity of energy generated by each of the principal generation companies in SIC for the periods presented:
Gross Energy Generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||
Central Cardones |
| | | | 1 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Colmito |
6 | 0.01 | 46 | 0.09 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Endesa S.A. |
12,312 | 23.58 | 15,184 | 29.88 | 15,362 | 31.48 | ||||||||||||||||||
Colbún S.A. |
12,170 | 23.31 | 10,363 | 20.39 | 10,636 | 21.80 | ||||||||||||||||||
AES Gener S.A. |
5,296 | 10.14 | 5,420 | 10.67 | 3,638 | 7.46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Empresa Eléctrica Guacolda S.A. |
4,889 | 9.36 | 5,115 | 10.06 | 4,422 | 9.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Empresa Eléctrica Pehuenche S.A. |
3,006 | 5.76 | 2,583 | 5.08 | 2,670 | 5.47 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other generation companies |
14,531 | 27.83 | 12,109 | 23.83 | 12,067 | 24.73 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
52,210 | 100.0 | 50,820 | 100.0 | 48,796 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dominican Republic
The power and electricity market in the Dominican Republic is served by a variety of generation companies, including (1) CEPP, (2) affiliates of AES Corp., which own one combined-cycle plant fueled by natural gas and two open-cycle plants fueled by natural gas, as well as equity interests in two plants fueled with
184
coal, (3) Empresa de Generación Hidroeléctrica Dominicana, a state-owned generation company whose primary generation facilities are hydroelectric plants, (4) Empresa Generadora de Electricidad Haina, S.A., (5) Compañía de Electricidad de San Pedro de Macorís, (6) Gas Natural SDG, S.A. (Gas Natural Fenosa), (7) Transcontinental Capital Corp. (Bermuda) Ltd (Seaboard), and (8) Consorcio Laesa Ltd. CEPP competes with each of these companies for the right to supply capacity and energy to distribution companies and other unregulated customers.
The following table sets forth the quantity of energy generated by each of the principal generation companies in the Dominican Republic for the periods presented:
Gross Energy Generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
(%) |
(GWh) |
Market
|
||||||||||||||||||
CEPP |
242 | 1.80 | 339 | 2.45 | 337 | 2.52 | ||||||||||||||||||
Affiliates of AES Corp. |
5,443 | 40.40 | 5,075 | 36.62 | 5,045 | 37.75 | ||||||||||||||||||
Empresa de Generación Hidroeléctrica Dominicana |
1,260 | 9.35 | 1,860 | 13.42 | 1,772 | 13.26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Empresa Generadora de Electricidad Haina, S.A |
2,731 | 20.27 | 1,739 | 12.55 | 1,248 | 9.34 | ||||||||||||||||||
Compañía de Electricidad de San Pedro de Macorís |
113 | 0.84 | 290 | 2.09 | 567 | 4.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gas Natural SDG, S.A. (Gas Natural Fenosa) |
919 | 6.82 | 1,096 | 7.91 | 1,129 | 8.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transcontinental Capital Corp. (Bermuda) Ltd (Seaboard) |
1,006 | 7.47 | 1,330 | 9.60 | 1,197 | 8.96 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consorcio Laesa Ltd |
471 | 3.50 | 737 | 5.32 | 771 | 5.77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other generation companies |
1,285 | 9.54 | 1,391 | 10.04 | 1,297 | 9.71 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
13,470 | 100.0 | 13,857 | 100.0 | 13,363 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Colombia
The electricity market in Colombia is served by a variety of generation companies, including (1) Surpetroil, (2) Empresas Públicas de Medellín E.S.P, (3) Emgesa S.A. E.S.P, (4) Isagen S.A. E.S.P and (5) Generadora y Comercializadora de Energía del Caribe S.A. E.S.P. Surpetroil competes with each of these companies for the right to supply energy and reliability to distribution companies and other unregulated customers.
The following table sets forth the quantity of energy generated by each of the principal generation companies in Colombia for the periods presented:
Gross Energy Generation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | 2013 | 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Company |
(GWh) |
Market
Share (%) |
(GWh) |
Market
Share (%) |
(GWh) |
Market
Share (%) |
||||||||||||||||||
Surpetroil |
23 | 0.04 | 22 | 0.04 | 22 | 0.04 | ||||||||||||||||||
Empresas Públicas de Medellín E.S.P |
13,626 | 21.18 | 14,518 | 23.34 | 17,955 | 29.93 | ||||||||||||||||||
Emgesa E.SP |
13,691 | 21.28 | 12,877 | 20.70 | 13,921 | 23.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Isagen S.A. E.SP |
10,609 | 16.49 | 10,322 | 16.60 | 11,018 | 18.37 | ||||||||||||||||||
Generadora y Comercializadora de Energía del Caribe S.A. E.S.P. |
7,508 | 11.67 | 6,834 | 10.99 | 2,232 | 3.77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other generation companies |
18,871 | 29.34 | 17,624 | 28.34 | 14,841 | 24.74 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
64,328 | 100.0 | 62,197 | 100.0 | 59,989 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185
Seasonality
Within the Latin American and the Caribbean countries in which we operate, power is generally generated by hydroelectric or thermal power stations. The hydroelectric stations are an efficient source of power generation due to the cost savings of fuel associated with thermal power generation. The power generated by these hydroelectric power stations varies in accordance with the rainy seasons and rainfall patterns of each country in each year. For example, greater amounts of hydroelectric power are dispatched between November and April in Peruthe Peruvian rainy seasonthan between May and October, when the volumes of rainfall declines and operators have less water available for electricity generation in the reservoirs serving their plants. However, greater amounts of hydroelectric power are dispatched between May and October in El Salvadorthe Salvadorian rainy seasonthan between November and April, when the volumes of Salvadorian rainfall declines and the hydroelectric units have less water available for electricity generation. El Salvadors hydroelectric plant is also subject to annual variations depending on climactic conditions, such as the El Niño phenomenon. For the same reasons, the volume of power generated by thermal power stations is also variable. Furthermore, our Nicaraguan assets which rely on wind generate less volume of power during the Nicaraguan rainy season between May and October, as those months tend to experience less wind. Accordingly, our revenues are subject to seasonality, the effects of rainfall, and the type of energy generated in each country of operation (whether hydroelectric or thermal, and whether generated using natural gas, HFO or diesel). Although we act to reduce this exposure to seasonality by contracting long-term PPAs for most of our capacity, this effect cannot be completely neutralized.
Within Israel, electricity demand is sensitive to temperatures and tends to be greater in the summer season (July to August) because of the use of air conditioners and in the winter season (December to February) because of the use of heating devices, as compared with the other months of the year. As a result, the tariffs in the winter and summer seasons are higher than those in the transition seasons, making Israeli power generators, such as OPC, more profitable, generally, in the winter and summer months, as compared to other months of the year. These seasonal increases are partially offset by an increase in fuel costs during those periods. For further information on the seasonality of tariffs in Israel, see IndustryIndustry OverviewIsrael.
186
Property, Plants and Equipment
The following table provides certain information regarding our power plants that are owned, leased or under construction, as of June 30, 2015:
Company/Plant |
Location |
Installed Capacity |
Fuel Type |
|||||
(MW) | ||||||||
Operating Companies | ||||||||
Peru Segment |
||||||||
Kallpa: |
||||||||
Kallpa I, II, III and IV |
Chilca district, Peru | 870 | Natural gas (combined cycle) | |||||
Las Flores |
Chilca district, Peru | 193 | Natural gas | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Kallpa Total |
1,063 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Israel Segment |
||||||||
OPC |
Mishor Rotem, Israel | 440 | Natural gas and diesel (combined cycle) | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Central America Segment |
||||||||
ICPNH |
||||||||
Corinto |
Chinandega, Nicaragua | 71 |
HFO |
|||||
Tipitapa Power |
Managua, Nicaragua | 51 |
HFO |
|||||
Amayo I |
Rivas, Nicaragua | 40 | Wind | |||||
Amayo II 1 |
Rivas, Nicaragua | 23 | Wind | |||||
|
|
|||||||
ICPNH Total |
185 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Puerto Quetzal |
Escuintla, Guatemala | 179 |
HFO |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
Nejapa |
Nejapa, El Salvador | 140 |
HFO |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
Other Segment |
||||||||
CEPP |
Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic | 67 |
HFO |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
COBEE: |
||||||||
Zongo Valley plants: |
||||||||
Zongo |
Zongo Valley, Bolivia | 11 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Tiquimani |
Zongo Valley, Bolivia | 9 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Botijlaca |
Zongo Valley, Bolivia | 7 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Cutichucho |
Zongo Valley, Bolivia | 23 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Santa Rosa |
Zongo Valley, Bolivia | 18 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Sainani 2 |
Zongo Valley, Bolivia | 10 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Chururaqui |
Zongo Valley, Bolivia | 25 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Harca |
Zongo Valley, Bolivia | 26 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Cahua |
Zongo Valley, Bolivia | 28 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Huaji |
Zongo Valley, Bolivia | 30 | Hydroelectric | |||||
|
|
|||||||
187 | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||
Miguillas Valley plants: |
||||||||
Miguillas |
Miguillas Valley, Bolivia | 4 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Angostura |
Miguillas Valley, Bolivia | 6 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Choquetanga |
Miguillas Valley, Bolivia | 6 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Carabuco |
Miguillas Valley, Bolivia | 6 | Hydroelectric | |||||
|
|
|||||||
22 | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||
El Alto-Kenko |
La Paz, Bolivia | 19 | Natural gas | |||||
|
|
|||||||
COBEE Total |
228 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
Central Cardones |
Copiapó, Chile | 153 | Diesel | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Colmito |
Concón, Chile | 58 | Natural gas and diesel | |||||
|
|
|||||||
JPPC |
Kingston, Jamaica | 60 |
HFO |
|||||
|
|
|||||||
Surpetroil |
||||||||
La Hocha |
Huila, Colombia | 3 | Natural gas | |||||
Purificación |
Tolima, Colombia | 10 | Natural gas | |||||
Entrerios |
Casanare, Colombia | 2 | Natural gas | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Surpetroil Total |
15 | |||||||
|
|
187
Company/Plant |
Location |
Installed Capacity |
Fuel Type |
|||||
(MW) | ||||||||
Assets in Advanced Stages of Construction | ||||||||
CDA |
Huancavelica, Peru | 510 | Hydroelectric | |||||
Samay I |
Mollendo, Peru | 600 | Diesel and natural gas | |||||
Kanan |
Colon, Panama | 92 |
HFO |
1. | Plant is out of service due to damage sustained as a result of landslides in March 2014. Plant is expected to be operational by the end of 2015. |
2. | Wind farm complex sustained damage in December 2014 in connection with a blackout in the National Interconnection System, which left one wind turbine collapsed and another two wind turbines with severe damage. The three damaged turbines, which represent 10% of all of our installed capacity at our Amayo I and II plants, are in the process of being replaced, and are expected to be operational by early 2016. Between the contracted operator and our insurance provider, we expect that there will be sufficient funds to cover the replacement and business interruption costs resulting from the damaged turbines. |
In addition, Cenérgica owns three fuel storage tanks with an aggregate capacity of 240,000 barrels and maintains a fuel depot and marine terminal located on a 6.5 hectare site that we lease in Acajutla, El Salvador.
We lease our principal executive offices in Lima, Peru and various other office space in the markets that we serve. We own all of our production facilities, other than the Kallpa I, Kallpa II, Kallpa III and Las Flores plants. We lease the Kallpa I, Kallpa II and Kallpa III and Las Flores plants under capital leases as described in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsTabular Disclosure of Contractual ObligationsMaterial IndebtednessKallpa Leases .
We believe that all of our production facilities are in good operating condition. We believe that we have satisfactory title to our plants and facilities in accordance with standards generally accepted in the electric power industry. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the consolidated net book value of our property, plant and equipment was $2,842 million and $2,515 million, respectively.
Maintenance and Spare Parts
Our operating subsidiaries regularly perform comprehensive maintenance on their facilities, including maintenance to turbines, engines, generators, transformers, the balance of plant and substations, as well as civil works maintenance. Maintenance is typically performed according to a predefined schedule at fixed intervals, based on running hours or otherwise according to manufacturer or engineering specifications. Maintenance is either performed by our trained employees, or is outsourced to third party contractors. In some cases, our operating subsidiaries have entered into long-term service agreements for their maintenance.
Each of our operating subsidiaries have arrangements to obtain spare parts, as necessary. Our operating subsidiaries generally purchase their spare parts from the OEMs, as well as from other suppliers. In some cases, our operating subsidiaries have entered into long-term supply contracts for spare parts.
Insurance
We carry insurance for our plants against material damage and consequent business interruption through comprehensive all-risks insurance policies. These all-risk insurance policies provide for total replacement values of $2.4 billion for property damage and $651 million for business interruption and are renewed annually. Specifically, our Kallpa and OPC plants are covered by insurance policies which provide for total replacement values of $660 million and $400 million for property damages per year, respectively, and $283 million and $186 million for business interruption damages per 18-month period, respectively. In some cases, we rely on our insurance policies in the event that any of our plants sustain damages or experience business interruptions as a result of the actions of, or a breach under the relevant agreement by, suppliers, customers or other third parties whose liability obligations are contractually limited. Our insurance coverage is underwritten by some of the largest international reinsurance companies, including Mapfre S.A., Munich Re, Zurich Insurance Group Ltd, ACE Limited, American International Group, Inc., Allianz SE and Swiss Re Ltd among others.
188
The material damage insurance for our operations provides insurance coverage for losses due to accidents resulting from fire, explosion and machinery breakdown, among others. This coverage has a maximum indemnification limit of $600 million per event (combined material damage and business interruption coverage). These policies have deductibles of up to $2 million, depending on the plant.
The business interruption coverage under each of these policies provides insurance for losses resulting from interruptions due to any material damage covered by the policy. The losses are covered until the plant production is fully re-established, with maximum indemnity periods ranging from 12 to 30 months.
We carry insurance for CDA to protect us against certain risks associated with this project. We carry a (1) construction all-risk policy with a limit of $679 million, (2) consequent delay in start-up policy with a limit of $180 million with a 24-month indemnity period, and (3) third-party liability policy with a limit of $25 million.
We carry insurance for Samay I to protect us against certain risks associated with this project. We carry a (1) construction all-risk policy with a limit of $320 million, (2) consequent delay in start-up policy with a limit of $86 million with a 18-month indemnity period, and (3) third-party liability policy with a limit of $40 million.
We do not anticipate having any difficulties in renewing any of our insurance policies and believe that our insurance coverage is reasonable in amount and consistent with industry standards applicable to energy generation companies operating in our markets.
Employees
As of December 31, 2014, we had a total of 1,235 employees. All of our employees are employed on a full-time basis, and are usually divided into one of the following functions: plant operation and maintenance, administrative support, corporate management, budget and finance, legal and project management.
The table below sets forth our breakdown of employees by main category of activity and by segment as of the dates indicated:
As of December 31, |
||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
Number of employees by category of activity: |
||||||||||||
Plant operation and maintenance |
842 | 445 | 367 | |||||||||
Administrative support |
310 | 159 | 139 | |||||||||
Corporate management, budget and finance |
33 | 23 | 21 | |||||||||
Other, including project management |
50 | 32 | 52 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
1,235 | 659 | 579 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Number of employees by segment: |
||||||||||||
Peru |
182 | 149 | 134 | |||||||||
Israel |
61 | 58 | 39 | |||||||||
Central America |
443 | 127 | 129 | |||||||||
Other |
549 | 325 | 277 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
1,235 | 659 | 579 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
We do not employ a material number of temporary employees.
As of December 31, 2014, approximately 17% of our employees were unionized, representing a significant portion of our employees in Israel, Bolivia and Jamaica. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 51% of OPCs employees were represented by Histadrut Labor Federation, the general federation of labor in
189
Israel, approximately 75% of COBEEs employees were represented by the Sindicato Unico de Trabajadores de Luz y Fuerza COBEE and approximately 23% of JPPCs employees were represented by Union of Technical Administrative and Supervisory Personnel. We negotiate a collective bargaining with each union on an annual basis. In June 2015, COBEEs facilities in Bolivia experienced a brief strike, which did not result in a work stoppage and did not have a material effect on our operations.
As our operations are subject to various hazards, our management places a high priority on, and closely monitors, the health and safety of our employees. We have installed policies, procedures and training programs to reduce workplace accidents at each of our operating companies.
Additionally, we have a competitive compensation structure for our employees and the managers of each of our operating subsidiaries. Compensation for such managers typically consists of a base salary, as well as a year-end bonus, which is based on the personal performance of the manager and the performance of the relevant operating subsidiary.
Shareholders Agreements
We hold a majority stake in most of our operating companiesKallpa, OPC, CEPP, Central Cardones, Surpetroil, Corinto, Tipitapa Power, Amayo I, Amayo II, CDA, and Samay Iand a non-controlling interest in Pedregal. The operations of these companies are subject to shareholders and/or member agreements. Although the terms of each of these shareholder and member agreements vary, they generally provide, in certain circumstances and subject to certain conditions: (1) each shareholder with the right to elect a specified number of directors and/or appoint specified executive officers; (2) for the distribution of dividends in proportion to each shareholders equity interest; (3) the minority shareholder with veto rights with respect to significant corporate actions ( e.g. , mergers, share issuances, the amendment of governing documents, and the entry into PPAs or other contracts in excess of a specified value) and certain approval protocol with respect to the budget of the relevant company; (4) each party with a right of first refusal with respect to any potential sale of equity interests in the relevant company; and (5) specifications of additional equity contributions, if any.
Additionally, we and Energía del Pacífico, the minority shareholder in each of Kallpa, Samay I, and CDA, have agreed we will each submit projects related to generation or transmission of energy in Peru to Kallpa and will not develop such projects other than through Kallpa. Similarly, we have provided tag-along rights to Yesid Gasca Duran, the minority shareholder in Surpetroil with respect to any new projects which we may develop or acquire in Colombia.
Legal Proceedings
Set forth below is a discussion of a significant legal proceeding to which our subsidiary is party. As of the date of this prospectus, we are not party to any additional significant legal proceedings.
KallpaImport Tax Assessments
Since 2010, SUNAT has issued tax assessments to Kallpa and its lenders (as lessors under the Kallpa leases) for payment of import taxes allegedly owed by Kallpa and its lenders in connection with the engineering services related to the EPC contractors of Kallpa I, II, III and IV. The assessments were made on the basis that Kallpa and its lenders did not include the value of the engineering services rendered by the contractor of the relevant project in the tax base of the imported equipment for the import taxes. Kallpa disagrees with these tax assessments on the grounds that the engineering services rendered to design and build the power plant are not part of the imported goods but a separate service for which Kallpa paid its corresponding taxes. Kallpa and its lenders disputed the tax assessments before SUNAT and, after SUNAT confirmed the assessments, appealed before the Peruvian Tax Administrative Court, or the Tribunal Fiscal, except for the assessment of Kallpa IV, for which SUNAT has not yet rendered a decision.
190
In January 2015, Kallpa and its lenders were notified that the Tribunal Fiscal had rejected their appeal in respect of the Kallpa I assessment. Kallpa and its lenders disagreed with the Tribunal Fiscals decision and challenged this decision in the Peruvian courts. In order to challenge the Kallpa I ruling, Kallpa and its lenders were required to pay the tax assessment of Kallpa I in the aggregate amount of approximately $12.3 million, which amount consists of the tax assessment for Kallpa I, plus related interest and fines. In April 2015, Kallpa and its lenders made the final payment (under protest) regarding Kallpa Is tax assessment in order to appeal the administrative ruling of the Tribunal Fiscal in the judicial system. Kallpa has reimbursed the lenders for each of the amounts due under the terms and conditions set forth in the operation agreement dated July 31, 2008, as amended, by and among Citibank del Perú S.A., Citileasing S.A., Banco de Crédito del Perú, Scotiabank Perú, and Kallpa. To the extent that the appeal is successful, Kallpa and its lenders will be entitled to seek the return of the amounts paid to SUNAT. A decision of the Tribunal Fiscal of the appeals in respect of the Kallpa II and III assessments is still pending.
As of February 2015, the total amount of import taxes claimed by SUNAT against Kallpa and its lenders in connection with the importation of equipment related to the Kallpa II, III and IV projects, equals approximately $22.2 million, including penalties, interest and fines in the amount of $17.9 million. For further information on these proceedings, see BusinessLegal ProceedingsKallpaImport Tax Assessments .
Regulatory, Environmental and Compliance Matters
In Latin America, Central America and the Caribbean, where we primarily operate, the electricity market allows for sale and delivery of power from power generators (private or government owned) to distribution companies (private or government owned) and to industrial (i.e., unregulated) consumers. In these countries there is typically structural segregation of power generation companies and transmission and distribution companies. In most of these countries there is a government-owned power grid and transmission services are provided on open access basis, i.e. the transmission company must transmit power through the grid and in exchange, charges a transmission rate set by the supervisory authority or based on a competitive proceeding or regulated tariff. Whereas in these markets private and government-owned entities compete for power generation, its transmission and distribution are conducted subject to exclusive franchises; therefore, the transmission and distribution operations are regulated in markets in which we operate.
In these countries, delivery and sale of power is subject to a regulatory regime (typical of privatized electricity markets) which includes supervision by an independent supervisory entity for the electricity market. For further information on the regulatory risks related our operations, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Government RegulationOur equipment, facilities and operations are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations.
Regulation of the Peruvian Electricity Sector
In Peru, power is generated by companies which primarily operate hydroelectric and natural gas based power stations. The general electricity laws in Peru form the statutory framework governing the electricity market in Peru and cover, among other things:
| generation, transmission, and distribution and trading of electricity; |
| operation of the energy market; and |
| generation prices, capacity prices and other tariffs. |
All entities that generate, transmit or distribute power to third parties in Peru operate subject to the general electricity laws in Peru. Power generating companies in Peru, such as Kallpa, are impacted by, among other things, regulation applicable to transmission and distribution companies.
191
Although significant private investment has been made in the electricity market in Peru and independent supervisory entities have been created to supervise and regulate the electricity market, the State of Peru has remained, in actual fact, in the role of supervisor and regulator. In addition, the State of Peru owns multiple power generation and distribution companies in Peru, although their market participation has diminished over time and face significant legal restrictions to engage in new projects or investments.
Regulatory Entities
There are five entities in charge of regulation, operation and supervision of the electricity market in Peru in general, and of our operations in Peru, in particular:
MINEM The Ministry of Energy and Mines, responsible for:
(a) setting national energy policy; (b) proposing and adopting laws and regulations to supervise the energy sector; (c) controlling expansion plans for SEIN; (d) approving proposed expansion plans by COES; (e) promoting scientific research and investment in energy; and (f) granting concessions or authorizations, as applicable, to entities to operate in power generation, transmission or distribution in Peru.
OSINERGMIN the Supervisor Body of Investment in Energy and Mining is an independent governmental regulatory agency responsible, among other things, for:
(a) supervising compliance of different entities with laws and regulations concerning power generation, transmission, distribution and trading; (b) setting transmission (electricity and natural gas) and distribution (electricity and natural gas) tariffs; (c) setting and enforcing price levels in the electricity market in Peru and setting tariffs for customers subject to regulated tariffs; (d) imposing fines and compensations for violations of the laws and regulations; (e) handling claims made by, against or between consumers and players in the electricity market; (f) supervising public tenders with regard to PPAs between generation companies and distribution companies for the supply to regulated consumers; and (g) supervising operations of COES.
Generation tariffs for the sale of energy by generation companies to distribution companies are generally determined based on tenders where OSINERGMIN sets a cap price that is not disclosed to participants except when the respective bid is unsuccessful because no party has made an offer below such price cap. In addition, OSINERGMIN annually specifies energy prices, known as the regulated tariff, which is used by market participants only in exceptional situations, as most of the PPAs with distribution companies are based on the results of the tenders. OSINERGMIN also determines the annual capacity prices used in agreements between generation companies and distribution companies, as well as in the spot market.
COES the Committee for the Economic Operation of the System is an independent private entity composed of qualified participants undertaking activities in the SEIN ( i.e. , electric power generators, transmission companies, distributors and major non regulated users) which is responsible, among others, for:
(a) planning and co-ordination of the power generation system for all power generation and transmission units, in order to ensure reliable generation at minimum cost; (b) setting spot market prices based on marginal cost; (c) managing the clearing house of the spot market transactions between generation companies (excess and shortage of actual generation vs. demand pursuant to PPAs); (d) allocating firm capacity and firm energy to generation units; (e) submitting proposals to OSINERGMIN for issuing regulatory standards, including technical standards and procedures used as guidelines for carrying out COES directives; (f) determining on a monthly basis the amounts owed between generators as consideration for energy injected into the grid and for ancillary services; and (g) proposing expansion plans for the transmission grid.
INDECOPI the Antitrust and Intellectual Property Authority in Peru.
192
OEFA the governmental body responsible for the power stations compliance with the environmental regulations.
Generation Companies
Since 1992, the Peruvian market has been operating based upon a marginal generation cost system. As mentioned before, such system is embedded in the general electricity laws of Peru and is administrated by COES. In such capacity the COES has as its main mandate to satisfy all the demand of electricity at any given time (i.e., periods of 15 minutes each) with the most efficient generation assets available at such time, independently of contractual arrangements between generators and their clients. For such purpose, the COES determines which generation facilities will be in operation at any given time with the objective of minimizing the overall system energy cost. Energy units are dispatched (i.e., ordered by the COES to inject energy into the system) on a real-time basis; units with lower variable generation costs are dispatched first and other less efficient generation units will be ordered to dispatch until the electricity demand is satisfied.
The variable cost for the most expensive generation unit dispatching in each 15-minute time period determines the spot price of electricity in said time period. Generally, the variable cost used for dispatch is audited by the COES, based on actual fuel costs, the plant efficiency, and variable maintenance costs. However, as natural gas supply and transportation contracts contain high levels of take-or-pay, the calculation of variable costs for these units is not straightforward. As a result, generators with power plants utilizing natural gas are allowed to declare the variable cost of their plants once a year and such declared cost may differ from the actual cost of such plant and this declaration will be the variable cost applicable for dispatch purposes for the next 12 months, being the declared cost part of the commercial strategy of the corresponding generator.
The spot market price is determined by the COES and is the price at which generation companies sell or buy power on the spot market during each 15-minute period. All injections and withdrawals of electricity are valued at the spot market price of the 15-minute period when they are made. Any generation companies with excess generation over energy sold pursuant to PPAs in each 15-minute interval, sell their excess energy at spot prices to generation companies with lower generation than their contractual obligations under PPAs for that time period. COES defines, on a monthly basis, the amounts that are owed by each generator with a net buyer position to generators with a net seller position. Generators with a net seller position directly invoice and collect from generators with a net buyer position the amounts liquidated by COES, respectively, not being COES involved in the payment procedure or providing any form of payment guarantee. As of the date of this prospectus, distribution companies and regulated consumers cannot purchase power off the grid at spot prices, but rather must contract agreements with power generation companies or for smaller consumers with distribution companies, which means that spot transactions are a zero-sum between generators.
Power generation companies are also paid capacity fees by SEIN, based on their firm capacity and other variables. Capacity transactions are subject to Law 25844. This law stipulates a methodology for calculating the capacity payments for each generation unit. Firm capacity calculation varies by type of technology, but is principally based upon the units effective capacity and its ability to supply energy continuously during the peak hours of the dry season, and also taking into consideration the historic availability statistics of the unit. Capacity payments are based primarily upon the units firm capacity and the regulated capacity price, but it is also affected by other variables, such as the expected supply-demand balance, the approved reserve margin, and the merit order of the generation unit. PPAs are commercial agreements, independent of actual allocation of generation or actual provision of availability. Generation companies that generate over any 15-minute period insufficient energy to satisfy the supply obligations under their PPAs purchase in the spot market the energy required to satisfy such supply obligations, based on COES procedures, from other generation companies with excess generation or availability during any such period. The energy price for those transactions is the spot price, and the capacity price is regulated and set by OSINERGMIN. Due to short term constraints in the gas supply and power transmission systems, which were generating distorting price signals in the spot market, the Government of Peru issued Emergency Decree 049-2008, extended by Emergency Decree 079-2010 and Law 30115. Pursuant
193
to this decree, COES is required to simulate energy spot prices without accounting for limitations due to shortage in supply and transportation of natural gas and for limitations on the transmission system. The latter scheme caps spot prices at a maximum amount of S/. 0.3135 per megawatt hour. Generation companies with units that are called to dispatch that have a variable cost higher than the spot price determined pursuant to the referenced emergency decree are compensated for the difference in their cost by transmission surcharges imposed on all end consumers of the SEIN ( i.e. , regulated and non-regulated customers) and collected by distribution companies. As of the date of this prospectus, the aforementioned government decree will be in force until December 2016. Emergency decrees are legislative statutes that are exceptionally issued by the Executive branch of the Government of Peru which can only be issued on circumstances and in areas specified in the Peruvian Constitution and are effective for a limited time period.
Sales of electricity under PPAs are not regulated unless they involve sales to distribution companies for resale to regulated customers. The latter PPAs are subject to price caps set by OSINERGMIN prior to the corresponding public bidding process where generators submit their bids. Generation and distribution companies may also enter into contracts resulting from a direct negotiation and not a bidding process, but only when the regulated tariff approved by OSINERGMIN is applicable. As with capacity transactions under PPAs, the financial settlement of energy transactions under PPAs is independent of the actual dispatch of energy by any particular generation unit. Generators accrue receivables from the counterparties to their PPAs based on the contract price in their PPAs and the amount of energy delivered from the SEIN, irrespective of the amount of energy that was produced by the generator counterparty to the PPA. The COESs dispatch of generation units in the SEIN is designed to satisfy the demand of electricity of the SEIN at any given time in the most efficient manner possible and the COES is not under any obligation to dispatch a particular generation unit to fulfill a generators PPA commitments.
The general electricity laws of Peru require generators with an installed capacity in excess of 500 kW that use renewable energy sources to obtain a definitive generation concession, and generators with an installed capacity in excess of 500 kW that use thermal energy sources to obtain a generation authorization. A concession for electricity generation activity is granted by the State of Peru acting through the MINEM and embedded in an agreement between the generator and the MINEM, while an authorization is merely a unilateral permit granted by the MINEM. Authorizations and concessions are granted by the MINEM for an unlimited period of time and their termination, respectively, is subject to the same considerations and requirements under the procedures set forth in the Law 25844 and related regulations. However, according to Legislative Decree 1221, the concessions granted as a result of an investment promotion process will have a term of up to 30 years.
The definitive concession allows its titleholder to use public lands and infrastructure, and obtain easements imposed by the MINEM (in lieu of easements agreed with the owner of the affected land plots) for the construction and operation of generation plants, substations or transmission lines and distribution networks, as applicable. The definitive concession is granted by a ministerial resolution issued by the MINEM. Also, definitive concessions for generation with renewable energy sources, with an installed capacity equal to or less than 10 MW are granted by resolution of the Energy and Mines Regional Directorate ( Dirección Regional de Energía y Minas ) of the corresponding regional government. In all cases a definitive concession involves the execution of a concession agreement under the form of a public deed. The concession agreement is based on a standard form and is recorded in the public registries.
Under the general electricity laws in Peru, the titleholders of authorizations have most of the rights and benefits of concessionaires and have basically, the same obligations than concessionaires.
Definitive concessions and authorizations may be terminated by relinquishment or breach upon the occurrence of certain termination events set forth in Law 25844 and upon completion of a procedure regulated by the general electricity laws in Peru. Termination events include: (i) failure to provide evidence of registration of the concession agreement in the public registry within the term of twenty business days following such registration; (ii) non-compliance with the schedule for completion of the project included in the concession
194
agreement, unless otherwise authorized by the MINEM due to force majeure; (iii) failure to operate for at least 876 hours during a calendar year, without justified cause; and (iv) failure by the concessionaire, after being penalized, to operate the facilities in accordance with COES operative regulations, unless otherwise authorized by the MINEM by justified reasons. The termination procedure for breach of the project schedule may be suspended by the concessionaire upon delivery of a new project schedule that is guaranteed with a performance bond, thereby providing a mechanism that in practice substantially reduces the risk of termination for such cause. According to Legislative Decree 1221, this guaranteed schedule will be approved only once.
Without prejudice to the above, Law 25844 provides that if the State of Peru declares the termination of a definitive concession for a reason different from those mentioned above ( i.e. , termination at will), the concessionaire shall be indemnified at the present value of the net cash flow of future funds generated by the concessions activities, using the discount rate set forth in article 79 of such law (12% on an annual basis). As of the date of this prospectus, we believe no concession has been terminated by the Government of Peru invoking its authority to terminate at will.
Termination of a definitive concession is declared by a ministerial resolution issued by MINEM. In such case, MINEM shall ensure the continuity of the operation of the generation plant by appointing a temporary administrator of the assets ( intervención), until the concession is transferred to a new concessionaire. MINEM shall appoint a consultant to make a valuation of the concession and its assets, elaborate the corresponding bidding rules and organize a tender procedure. MINEM shall award the definitive concession to the best bid offered. The product of the tender shall be used to pay the costs of the temporary administration, the costs of the tender procedure, and any balance shall be allocated in favor of the former concessionaire. The procedure for termination of an authorization is similar to that of a concession. We believe that no definitive concession or authorization of a project that actually started construction or operation has been terminated, as of the date of this prospectus.
Transmission Companies
Transmission in the SEIN grid is operated by the individual companies that conform the transmission system and is centrally coordinated by COES. Expansion plans for the transmission grid are proposed by COES to MINEM for final approval; prior to executing the COES expansion plan, the Government of Peru prepares the transmission plan. Transmission companies who wish to participate in construction of the transmission system specified in the expansion plan are required to submit their bid for a tender organized by the Peruvian Agency for the Promotion of Private Investments (ProInversión) . The transmission company awarded the tender may operate the line over the term of its concession (usually 30 years) and would be eligible to receive tariff payments paid by all the final users in the SEIN, as specified in the tender document and incorporated into its concession contract. The group of transmission lines created pursuant to such tenders after 2006 are known as guaranteed transmission lines. Transmission lines not included in plans such as the aforementioned, independently constructed by transmission companies after 2006, are known as complementary transmission lines; tariffs for use of these lines are determined by OSINERGMIN and are paid based upon actual use.
Transmission lines created prior to 2006 are categorized into two groups. Transmission lines available for use by all generation companies are categorized as principal transmission lines; transmission lines only used by specific generation or distribution companies and only available to these generation companies are categorized as secondary transmission lines. Both the Kallpa and Las Flores facilities transmit the power generated by their plants through secondary transmission lines built prior to 2006, which then connect to primary and guaranteed transmission lines.
Distribution Companies
According to the general electricity laws in Peru, distribution companies are required to provide energy to regulated customers at regulated prices. Distribution companies may also provide energy to customers not
195
subject to regulated pricespursuant to PPAs. As of the date of this prospectus, the only private distribution companies holding a distribution concession are: Luz del Sur, Edelnor, Edecañete, Electro Dunas and Coelvisac. These five companies distributed 73% of all energy distributed by distribution companies in Peru in 2014. The remainder of power is sold by Government-owned entities.
Prior to July 2006, pricing in all contracts between generation companies and distribution companies with respect to sale of power to end customers at regulated prices, included energy tariffs composed of payment for capacity, energy and transmission, as determined by OSINERGMIN. Distribution companies sell energy on the regulated market at cost plus an additional distribution charge known as VAD. After July 2006, most of the agreements result from tenders in which generation companies bid prices. Bid prices include payment for capacity and energy.
The energy purchased by distribution companies from generation companies at regulated prices pursuant to old PPAs accounted for less than 56% of total purchasing in 2014and is expected to decrease in coming years.
Since July 2006, pursuant to Law 28832, contracts to sell energy to distribution companies for resale to regulated customers may be made at fixed prices based on public bids of generation companies or at regulated prices set by the OSINERGMIN. After the bidding process is concluded, a distribution company will be entitled to purchase energy from the winning bidder at the bid price for the life of the relevant PPA. The prices obtained through the public bid process are subject to a maximum energy price set by the OSINERGMIN prior to bidding. If all the bids are higher than the price set by the OSINERGMIN, the public bids are disregarded and no PPA will be awarded. The process may be repeated until the prices that are offered are below the cap set by the OSINERGMIN for each process.
Regulated tariffs are annually set by OSINERGMIN through a public procedure conducted by the Adjunct Manager´s Office for Tariff Regulation ( Gerencia Adjunta de Regulación Tarifaria ) and are effective from the month of May of each year. During this process, the OSINERGMIN will take into account a proposal delivered by the COES.
The price components of the regulated tariffs are: (i) the regulated price of energy; (ii) the capacity price in peak hours; and, (iii) the transmission toll, and are calculated considering the following:
| a projection of demand for the next 24 months, considering generation and transmission facilities scheduled to start operations during such period. The projection assumes, as a constant, the cross-border ( i.e. , Ecuador) supply and demand based on historical data of transactions in the last year; |
| an operations program that minimizes the operation and rationing costs for the period taking into account the hydrology, reservoirs, fuel costs and a rate of return ( Tasa de Actualización ) of 12% annual. The evaluation period includes a projection of the next 24 months and the 12 months precedent to March 31 of each year considering historic data; |
| a forecast of the short-term marginal costs of the expected operations program, adapted to the hourly blocks ( bloques horarios ) established by OSINERGMIN; |
| determination of the basic price of energy ( precio básico de la energía ) for the hourly blocks of the evaluation period, as a weighted average of the marginal costs previously calculated and the electricity demand, updated to March 31 of the corresponding year; |
| determination of the most efficient type of generation unit to supply additional power to the system during the hour of maximum peak demand during the year ( demanda máxima anual ) and the annual investment costs, considering a rate of return of 12% on an annual basis; |
196
| the base price of capacity in peak hours ( precio básico de la potencia de punta ) is determined following the procedure established in the general electric laws of Peru, considering as a cap the annual investment costs (which include connection and operation and maintenance costs). An additional margin to the basic price shall be included if the reserve of the system is insufficient; |
| calculation of the nodal factors of energy ( factores nodales de energía ) for each bar of the system. The factor shall be equal to 1.00 for the bar where the basic price is set; |
| the capacity price in peak hours ( precio de la potencia de punta en barra ) is calculated for each bar of the system, adding to the basic price of capacity in peak hours the unit values of the Transmission Toll and the Connection Toll referred to in Article 60 of Law 25844; and |
| the bus bar price of energy ( precio de energía en barra ) is calculated for each bar of the system, multiplying the nodal basic price of energy ( precio básico de la energía nodal ) of each hourly block by the respective nodal factor of energy. |
Peruvian Energy Policy 2010 - 2040
The Energy Policy 2010-2040 was approved by Supreme Decree 064-2010-EM. By this document, the Peruvian Government set forth the following objectives in order to improve the energy market:
| develop a diversified energy matrix, based on renewable energy resources and efficiency. The government, among other measures, will prioritize the development of efficient hydroelectric projects for electricity generation; |
| competitive energy supply. One of the main guidelines is to promote private investment in energy projects. The Government of Peru has a subsidiary role in the economy as mandated by the Peruvian Constitution; |
| universal access to energy supply. Among other guidelines, the Government of Peru shall develop plans to ensure the supply of power and hydrocarbons; |
| promote a more efficient supply chain and efficient energy use. Comprises promoting the automation of the energy market through technological repowering; |
| achieve energy self-sufficiency. For such purpose, the Peruvian Government will promote the use of energy resources located in the country; |
| develop an energy sector with minimal environmental impact and low carbon in a sustainable development framework. Promote the use of renewable energy and eco-friendly technologies that avoid environmental damage and promote obtaining Certified Emission Reductions, or CERs, by the energy projects developed; |
| strengthen the institutional framework of the energy sector. Maintain a legal stability intended to promote development of the sector in the long term. Likewise, simplification and optimization of administrative and institutional structure of the sector will be promoted; |
| regional market integration for a long-term development. Regional interconnection agreements will permit the development of infrastructure for energy uses; and |
| developing the natural gas industry and its use in household activities, transportation, commerce and industry as well as efficient power generation. |
197
Regulation of the Nicaraguan Electricity Sector
The electricity market in Nicaragua is subject to the Electrical Industry Law and regulations based thereupon, which apply to the electricity sector and the wholesale power market. The Electrical Industry Law is subject to supervision by local authorities.
The regulation of the Nicaraguan electricity market governs three sectors of the electricity market, which are vertically unbundled: generation, transmission and distribution. Units which use renewable resources, such as wind, geothermal and biomass, are dispatched with priority over thermal units. Transmission is administered by a government-owned company and distribution is carried out by a sole private company, which is subject to regulated prices.
The power pricing mechanism in Nicaragua is based on a free market where generation companies compete for dispatch, and the spot price is determined on an hourly basis, based on marginal cost and considering the last unit dispatched in such hour. All power generation companies are required to obtain a license from the Ministry of Energy and Mines for the right to generate and sell power to the national grid. Generation companies can sell energy to distribution companies or to non-regulated clients.
Regulation of the Salvadorian Electricity Sector
Through July 2011, the electricity market in El Salvador was based on purchase and sale of power by competitive price tenders by generation companies. In August 2011, the electricity market in El Salvador was re-structured and is now essentially similar to electricity markets in other Latin American countries in which we operate. Currently, generation units are dispatched based on the variable cost thereof, and prices are determined by the variable cost of the most expensive unit operating. Due to this change, local distribution companies have issued a first tender for purchase of power over a two to three year term. In conjunction with this tender, Nejapa was awarded a contract to provide 71 MW over a four to five years term, through January 2018 and a 39 MW PPA over a four-year period until July 2017.
Regulation of the Bolivian Electricity Sector
The electricity market in Bolivia is subject to Bolivias Electricity Act and regulations based there upon, which apply to the electricity sector and the wholesale power market in Bolivia and which is subject to supervision by local authorities. The power pricing system in Bolivia is based on a free market where generation companies compete for dispatch of their generation units, and the spot price is determined based on marginal cost (similar to Peru), with free access to transmission and distribution systems. However, major customers purchase power at regulated tariffs. The price for energy and power generation in this country is based on marginal cost. According to Bolivias 2009 constitution, all power generation companies in Bolivia are required to obtain a license from the relevant authority for the right to generate and sell power on the national grid. As of the date of this prospectus, COBEE operates in accordance with the interim licenses awarded to it. There is no certainty that we will obtain the necessary permanent licenses.
In December 2011, the Bolivian government amended the applicable law to prohibit generation companies from entering into new PPAs. For further information on the risks related the potential nationalization of our assets in Bolivia, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Our BusinessThe Government of Bolivia has nationalized energy industry assets, and our remaining operations in Bolivia may also be nationalized .
Regulation of the Chilean Electricity Sector
The electricity market in Chile consists of three sectors: generation, transmission and distribution. Power generation is open to competition, whereas transmission and distribution are conducted by monopolies subject to regulated prices.
198
The electricity market in Chile uses the marginal generation cost method to determine the sequence of dispatch of power stations, thereby ensuring that demand for power is satisfied at the minimum system cost. This method, launched in 1982, is now used in many countries.
Chile has four power systems, of which two of these are its major systems. The largest system is the SIC, with capacity of 15,181 MW, primarily consisting of hydro-electric, coal-based power stations and dual power stations using natural gas (imported as liquid natural gas) or diesel. SIC serves over 90% of the Chilean population.
The second largest system is the SING, with capacity of 4,970 MW. SING covers a 700 kilometer stretch of Chiles northern coast line. SING serves 6% of Chiles population and is a major power supplier for the countrys copper mining industry.
The two other power systems located in the south of Chile are relatively smaller.
Central Cardones and Colmito are part of the SIC power grid. The National Energy Commission ( Comisión Nacional de Energía ) is an independent government regulator which determines distribution tariffs, among other things. Prices used by generation companies to sell power to distribution companies for regulated customers (those customers who consume up to 2 MW) are determined by regulated tenders. Power prices for non-regulated customers are determined by direct negotiations and by tenders, with no intervention by government entities. Tariffs for expansion of the transmission system are determined by international tenders.
Regulation of the Dominican Republic Electricity Sector
The regulatory framework of the electricity sectors in the Dominican Republic is essentially similar to the one in Peru. Power generation in the Dominican Republic is based on free competition among private and government-owned generation companies, whereas the transmission and distribution grid is controlled by government-owned companies. The main source of revenues for generation companies is direct energy sale to distribution companies and from sale of energy and availability on the spot market.
The large-scale theft of power from the grid is prevalent in the Dominician Republic. Since generation and distribution companies do not pass through the cost associated with such theft to consumers the government must provide significant subsidies to these companies.
Regulation of the Colombian Electricity Sector
Since 1994, the electricity sector in Colombia has allowed private companies to participate in the different types of businesses in the industry chain. The different activities of the electricity sector are governed by Law 142 of 1994, or the Public Service Code and Law 143 of 1994, or the Electricity Code. The industrys activities are also governed by the regulations and technical standards issued by the CREG. The wholesale energy market began operating in July 2005, and since then generating companies must submit price bids and report the quantity of energy available on a daily basis in a competitive environment.
The Colombian Electricity Act regulates the generation, trading, transmission and distribution of electricity. Under the law, any company, domestic or foreign, may undertake any of these activities. New companies, however, must engage exclusively in one of these activities. Trading can be combined with either generation or distribution. The system formed by generation plants, the interconnected grid, regional transmission lines, distribution lines and consumer loads is referred to as the SIN. Utility companies are required to ensure continuous and efficient service, facilitate the access of low-income users through subsidies granted by the government, inform users regarding efficient and safe use of services, protect the environment, allow access and interconnection to other public service companies and large customers, cooperate with the authorities in the event of an emergency to prevent damage to users and report to the authority any commercial start-up of operations.
199
The Colombian electricity market includes two types of customers: unregulated and regulated. Unregulated customers (those who consume a minimum of 100 kWh or 55,000 kWh per month) can negotiate freely with generation companies, distribution companies or traders. Regulated customers (all other customers) must purchase energy through public bids and establish bilateral two-party agreements, which normally last from one to five years.
The maximum market share for generators is limited by law. The limit for generators is 25.0% of firm energy. Firm energy refers to the maximum electric energy that a generation plant is able to deliver on a continuous basis during a year in extremely dry conditions, such as in the case of the El Niño phenomenon. Such limits are applied to economic groups, including companies that are controlled by, or under common control with, other companies. In addition, generators may not own more than a 25% interest in a distributor, and vice versa. However, this limitation only applies to individual companies and does not preclude cross-ownership by companies of the same corporate group.
A generator, distributor, trader or an integrated company, i.e. , a firm combining generation, transmission and distribution activities, cannot own more than 15.0% of the equity in a transmission company if the latter represents more than 2.0% of the national transmission business in terms of revenues. A distribution company can own more than 25.0% of an integrated companys equity if the market share of the integrated company is less than 2% of national generation revenues. Any company created before enactment of the Electricity Code is prohibited from merging with another company created after the enactment thereof.
The Ministry of Mines and Energy of Colombia defines the governments policy for the energy sector. Other government entities which play an important role in the electricity industry include the Public Utility Superintendency of Colombia, which is in charge of overseeing and inspecting the utility companies, the Superintendency of Industry and Commerce, which is in charge of evaluating market competency, CREG, which is in charge of regulating the energy and gas sectors and the UPME, which is in charge of planning the expansion of the generation and transmission network.
CREG is empowered to issue regulations that govern technical and commercial operations and to set charges for regulated activities. CREGs main functions are to establish conditions for gradual deregulation of the electricity sector toward an open and competitive market, approve charges for transmission and distribution networks and charges to regulated customers, establish the methodology for calculating and establishing maximum tariffs for supplying the regulated market, establish regulations for planning and coordination of operations of the SIN and establish technical requirements for quality, reliability and security of supply, and protection of customers rights.
Regulation of the Israeli Electricity Sector
IEC
IEC, in which the State of Israel maintains a 99.846% equity interest, operates as a vertically integrated electricity company. IEC generates and supplies the majority of electricity in Israel according to licenses granted by virtue of the Electricity Sector Law 5756-1996, or the Electricity Sector Law, and transmits and distributes all of the electricity in Israel. In addition, IEC acts as the System Operator of Israels electricity system, determining the dispatch order of generation units, granting interconnection surveys, and setting spot prices, etc. within Israel. IEC is required, among other things, to provide service to the general public, purchase electricity from IPPs, provide infrastructure and certain backup services, and act to ensure provision of all of its services, including services pursuant to a development plan approved in accordance with the Electricity Sector Law.
The objective of the Electricity Sector Law enacted in 1996, is to regulate the activity in the electricity market for the good of the public, guaranteeing reliability, availability, quality, efficiency, while concurrently creating conditions for competition and minimizing costs.
200
IEC is classified as an Essential Service Provider, as defined in the Electricity Sector Law. As such, it is subject to statutory obligations and operations for proper management of the electricity market in favor of the entire public without discrimination, including filing development plans, management of the power system, management of the power transmission and distribution systems, providing backup and infrastructure services to IPPs and to consumers, and purchasing power from IPPs.
IEC was declared a monopoly by the Israeli Antitrust Authority in all segments of the electricity sector: generation, transmission, distribution, supply and provision of backup services for electricity customers and manufactures.
Pursuant to the Electricity Sector Law, the Minister of National Infrastructures, Energy and Water Resources, or the Minister of Energy, has an overall responsibility for the electricity sector in Israel, including responsibility for IEC and its overall supervision. In July 2013, the State of Israel appointed a steering committee, tasked with proposing a comprehensive reform of IEC and the Israeli electricity market. The committee was mandated to review the electricity market structure, while focusing on unbundling the electricity market, the implementation of competition in the competitive sectors, the financial stabilization of IEC, and the development of a plan to improve IECs efficiency. Although the steering committee has not published its final recommendations, and there have been no formal announcements concerning the steering committees discussions or negotiations with IEC and the State of Israel, the steering committee may formally renew its discussions and publish its final recommendations in the future or otherwise commence with comprehensive reform of IEC and the Israeli electricity market. The effect of any such reforms on OPC is uncertain.
PUAE
The PUAE was established in 1996 in accordance with the Electricity Sector Law. The PUAE is responsible for granting licenses (subject to approval by the Minister of Energy), supervising the holders of such licenses, setting the tariffs and determining the standards of service which are required from a holder of an Essential Service Provider license. As such, the PUAE oversees both the government-owned IEC and the IPPs.
The PUAE determines the electricity tariffs to the public, based on the costs of IEC which the PUAE decides to recognize, and including a fair rate of return on equity. The PUAE sets different tariffs for the various electricity segments. In addition, the PUAE sets the tariffs that IEC pays for electricity purchased from IPPs. The Electricity Sector Law provides that IEC will collect payments pursuant to the tariffs set by the PUAE and that IEC will make payments to another license holder or a customer, pursuant to the relevant tariffs.
Each year, the PUAE performs an annual update of the various components of the costs recognized in the tariffs, and publishes a new set of tariffs accordingly. In April 2012, the generation component tariff increased 6% to NIS 366.6 per MWh. In July 2013, the PUAE published four generation component tariffs/power cost indicators, ranging from NIS 386 per MWh to NIS 333.2 per MWh, instead of the single tariff that had previously been used. In January 2015, the PUAE replaced the four tariffs with two tariffs, reducing the rates by approximately 10% to NIS 300.9 per MWh and NIS 301.5 per MWh effective as of February 1, 2015. On September 8, 2015, the PUAE published a final decision, which became effective on September 13, 2015, reducing the PUAE generation component tariff by approximately 12% to NIS 265.2 per MWh. OPCs operations can be affected by changes in the PUAEs policies, regulations, and tariffs. The PUAEs generation component tariff, for example, serves as the base price for OPCs calculation of the sale price of its energy to its private customers. As a result, increases or decreases in this tariff have a related effect on the sales price of OPCs energy and OPCs revenues. In addition, the price at which OPC purchases its natural gas from its sole natural gas supplier, the Tamar Group, is predominantly indexed (in excess of 70%) to changes in the PUAEs generation component tariff, pursuant to the price formula set forth in OPCs supply agreement with the Tamar Group. As a result, its increases or decreases have a related effect on OPCs cost of sales and margins. In addition, the natural gas price formula in OPCs supply agreement is subject to a floor mechanism. As a result of previous declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, OPC will begin to pay the ultimate floor price in
201
November 2015. Therefore, the recent September 2015 decline and any further declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, will not result in a corresponding decline in OPCs natural gas expenses, and will therefore lead to a greater decline in OPCs margins, which may have a material adverse effect on OPCs business, results of operations and financial condition.
Furthermore, since 2013, the PUAE had been in the process of determining a system cost tariff. In August 2015, the PUAE published a decision that IPPs in Israel would be obligated to pay system management service charges, which charges are retroactively effective as of June 1, 2013. According to the PUAE decision, as amended in September 2015, the amount of system management service charges that would be payable by OPC from the effective date of June 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015, is approximately NIS 159 million (approximately $41 million), not including interest rate and linkage costs. The approximately NIS 159 million which the PUAE has deemed payable by OPC is based upon the average rate of the system management service charges. However, as the rate of the new system management service charges, like other rates of the PUAE, varies by season (e.g., summer and winter) and by demand period (peak, shoulder and off-peak), the PUAEs final calculation of the amount payable by OPC will be based upon the applicable time of use rates. For further information on Israels seasonality and the related PUAE tariffs, see IndustryIndustry OverviewIsrael . ICP is considering the implications of this decision and may contest it.
In its financial statements for 2014 initially authorized for issuance and its financial statements for 2013, OPC recorded provisions for system management service charges and diesel surcharges, which were initially recorded in its statement of financial position in the aggregate amount of $70 million as of December 31, 2014. In ICPs opinion, due to the PUAE decision, it is more likely than not that OPC will not be charged more than the amount that was indicated in the PUAE decision above. Therefore, OPC revised the provisions as of December 31, 2014, such that the total balance of the provision as of December 31, 2014 was $27 million. The total balance of the provision as of June 30, 2015 was $38 million.
Additionally, on August 5, 2015, as a part of the legislative process regarding the State of Israels 2015 2016 budget, draft legislation was introduced incorporating, among other things, amendments to the Electricity Sector Law-1996. If approved by the Knesset (the Israeli parliament), the PUAE will be replaced by a new electricity authority, which will be a part of the Ministry of National Infrastructures, Energy and Water Resources, as of January 1, 2016. Any decisions of the PUAE, including decisions regarding licenses and tariffs, prior to this date will remain in force and will be deemed to have been made by the new electricity authority, if such authority is indeed approved and created.
Regulatory Framework for Conventional IPPs
The regulatory framework for current and under construction conventional IPPs was set by the PUAE in 2008. An IPP may choose to allocate its generation capacity, as permanently available capacity, or PAC, or as variable available capacity, or VAC. PAC means capacity that is allocated to IEC and is dispatched according to IECs instructions. PAC receives a capacity payment for the capacity allocated to IEC, as well as energy payment to cover the energy costs, in the event that the unit is dispatched. VAC refers to capacity that is allocated to private consumers, and sold according to an agreement between the IPP and a third party. Under VAC terms, an IPP may sell the capacity to IEC on a short term basis. IEC may purchase electricity from the VAC allocated to it, based on a bid price. An IPP may choose to allocate its capacity between 70% to 90% as PAC, with the remaining 30% to 10% as VAC, or 100% VAC.
In December 2014, the PUAE published a new regulatory framework for conventional IPPs, which shall apply to conventional IPPs who have commenced commercial operations as of January 2019. The new framework allows an IPP to choose between a transaction with IEC (similar to PAC regulation), and a bilateral agreement with a third party.
202
OPCs Regulatory Framework
OPC operates according to a tender issued by the state of Israel in 2001 and, in accordance therewith, OPC and the IEC executed the IEC PPA in 2009, which stipulates the regulatory framework of OPC. OPCs framework differs from the general regulatory framework for IPPs, as set by the PUAE and described above.
According to the IEC PPA, OPC may sell electricity in one or more of the following ways:
1. | Capacity and Energy to IEC : according to the IEC PPA, OPC is obligated to allocate its full capacity to IEC. In return, IEC shall pay OPC a monthly payment for each available MW, net, that was available to IEC. |
In addition, when IEC requests to dispatch OPC, IEC shall pay OPC for the starting of the power plant (an amount that covers the starting costs), as well as a variable payment for each operating hour. IEC shall also pay the fuel cost of OPC.
2. | Sale of energy to end users : OPC is allowed to inform IEC, subject to an advanced notice, that it is releasing itself in whole or in part from the allocation of capacity to IEC, and extract (in whole or in part) the capacity allocated to IEC, in order to sell electricity to private customers pursuant to the Electricity Sector Law. OPC may, subject to an advanced notice, re-include the excluded capacity (in whole or in part) as capacity sold to IEC. |
OPC informed IEC, as required by the IEC PPA, of the exclusion of the entire capacity of its power plant, in order to sell such capacity to private customers. Since July 2013, the entire capacity of OPC has been allocated to private customers. Under the IEC PPA, OPC can also elect to revert back to supplying to the IEC instead of to private customers.
The IEC PPA includes a transmission and backup appendix, which requires IEC to provide transmission and backup services to OPC and its customers, for private transactions between OPC and its customers, and the tariffs payable by OPC to IEC for these services. Moreover, upon entering a PPA between OPC and an individual consumer, OPC becomes the sole electricity provider for this customer, and IEC is required to supply power to this customer when OPC is unable to do so, in exchange for a payment by OPC according to the tariffs set by the PUAE for this purpose. For further information on the risks associated with the indexation of the PUAEs generation tariff and its potential impact on OPCs business, financial condition and results of operations, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to Government RegulationThe production and profitability of IPPs in Israel may be adversely affected by changes in Israels regulatory environment.
Regulatory Framework for Cogeneration IPPs
The regulatory framework for current and under construction cogeneration IPPs was established by the PUAE in its 2008 and 2013 decisions. The primary difference between the regulation of cogeneration IPPs (as compared to the regulation of conventional IPPs) is that, as long as the cogeneration production unit meets the definition of a Cogeneration Production Unit as stipulated in the regulations (which require such unit to, among other things, meet a certain efficiency rate), and if the cogeneration IPP so wishes, IEC will be obliged to purchase energy from such IPP in accordance with the following provisions:
1. | At peak and shoulder times, one of the following shall apply: |
a. each year, the IPP may sell up to 70% of the total electrical energy, calculated annually, produced in its facility to IEC for up to 12 years from the date of the grant of the license; and
b. each year, the IPP may sell up to 50% of the total electrical energy, calculated annually, produced in its facility to IEC for up to 18 years from the date of the grant of the license.
203
2. | At low demand times, IPPs with units with an installed capacity of up to 175 MW, may sell electrical energy produced by it with a capacity of up to 35 MW, calculated annually (in accordance with the duration applicable to the IPP with respect to peak and shoulder time, as set forth above). |
According to regulations published by the PUAE in January 2015, if a cogeneration facility no longer qualifies as a Cogeneration Production Unit, such cogeneration facility may be entitled, under certain circumstances, to operate under the regulatory framework for conventional IPPs, with certain modifications and limitations.
AIEs Regulatory Framework
As set forth above, AIE must meet certain conditions before it will be subject to the regulatory framework for cogeneration IPPs and be considered a Cogeneration Production Unit. For example, AIE will have to obtain a certain efficiency rate which will depend, in large part, upon the steam consumption of AIEs consumers. In circumstances where AIE no longer satisfies such conditions and therefore no longer qualifies as a Cogeneration Production Unit, AIE may be entitled to operate under the special regulatory framework set forth in the regulations published by the PUAE in January 2015, as described above in Regulatory Framework for Cogeneration IPPs .
204
Directors and Senior Management
The following table sets forth information regarding IC Powers directors as of the date of this prospectus.
Name |
Age |
Position |
Date Elected |
Term Expires |
||||
Laurence N. Charney |
68 | Chairman of the Audit Committee | 2015 | |||||
Yoav Doppelt |
46 |
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
2015 | |||||
Cyril Pierre-Jean Ducau |
37 | Director | 2015 | |||||
Tzahi Goshen |
40 | Audit Committee Member | 2015 | |||||
Aviad Kaufman |
45 | Director | 2015 |
The following table sets forth information regarding IC Powers expected senior management as of the date of this prospectus:
Name |
Age |
Position |
||
Javier García-Burgos |
45 | Chief Executive Officer | ||
Alberto Triulzi |
58 | Chief Financial Officer | ||
Roberto Cornejo |
52 | Chief Operating Officer | ||
Juan Carlos Camogliano |
51 | Chief Investment Officer Americas | ||
Giora Almogy |
45 | Chief Investment Officer Europe & Asia | ||
Frank Sugrañes |
50 | Chief Technical Officer | ||
Daniel Urbina |
46 | General Counsel |
Our business address is the business address of all of our directors and senior management.
Biographies of our Directors and Senior Management
Laurence N. Charney . Mr. Charney currently serves as the chairman of the audit committee of Kenon. Mr. Charney retired from Ernst & Young LLP, or Ernst & Young, in June 2007, where, over the course of his more than 35-year career, he served as Senior Audit Partner, Practice Leader and Senior Advisor. Since his retirement from Ernst & Young, Mr. Charney has served as a business strategist and financial advisor to boards, senior management and investors of early stage ventures, private businesses and small to mid-cap public corporations across the consumer products, energy, real estate, high-tech/software, media/entertainment, and non-profit sectors. His most recent affiliations have included board tenures with Pacific Drilling S.A. and Kenon, each of which are members of a group of companies associated with the same ultimate beneficiary, Mr. Idan Ofer, as well as Marvel Entertainment, Inc. and TG Therapeutics, Inc. Mr. Charney is a graduate of Hofstra University with a Bachelors Degree in Business Administration (Accounting), and has also completed an Executive Masters program at Columbia University. Mr. Charney maintains active membership with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the New York State Society of Certified Public Accountants.
Yoav Doppelt . Mr. Doppelt is the Chief Executive Officer of Kenon and has served in this capacity since its inception in 2014. Mr. Doppelt also served as the Chief Executive Officer of XT Investments Group (formerly known as Ofer Investments Group) from its inception in 2007 to 2014 and served as the Chief Executive Officer of XT Capital (formerly known as Ofer Hi-Tech) from 2001 to 2014, each of which are members of a group of companies associated with the same ultimate beneficiary, Mr. Idan Ofer. Mr. Doppelt joined the XT Group (formerly known as Ofer Group) in 1996 and has been with XT Capital since its inception in 1997, defining the vision and operational methodology of its private equity and high-tech investments. Mr. Doppelt has held various finance and managerial positions in the XT Group since joining. Mr. Doppelt has previously served as a member of the board of directors of a number of public companies and was actively involved in numerous investments within the private equity and high-tech arenas. Currently, Mr. Doppelt serves as a member of Lumenis Ltd.s board of directors. Mr. Doppelt has extensive operational and business experience in growth companies and has successfully led several private equity exit transactions. Recently, Mr. Doppelt has been actively involved in the
205
public offering of equity and debt instruments in the U.S. Mr. Doppelt holds a Bachelors Degree in Economics and Management from the Faculty of Industrial Management at the TechnionIsrael Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel and a Masters of Business Administration from Haifa University, Israel.
Cyril Pierre-Jean Ducau. Mr. Ducau is the Managing Director of Quantum Pacific Ventures Limited and a member of the board of directors of Kenon, Pacific Drilling S.A., Quantum Pacific Shipping Services Pte. Ltd. and Ansonia Holdings Singapore B.V., each of which are members of a group of companies associated with the same ultimate beneficiary, Mr. Idan Ofer, as well as other private companies. He was previously Head of Business Development of Quantum Pacific Advisory Limited in London from 2008 to 2012. Prior to joining Quantum Pacific Advisory Limited, Mr. Ducau was Vice President in the Investment Banking Division of Morgan Stanley & Co. International Ltd. in London and, during his tenure there from 2000 to 2008, he held various positions in the Capital Markets, Leveraged Finance and Mergers and Acquisitions teams. Prior to that, Mr. Ducau gained experience in consultancy working for Arthur D. Little in Munich and investment management with Credit Agricole UI Private Equity in Paris. Mr. Ducau graduated from ESCP Europe Business School (Paris, Oxford, Berlin) and holds a Master of Science in business administration and a Diplom Kaufmann.
Tzahi Goshen . Mr. Goshen is the Chief Financial Officer of Kenon and has served in this capacity since its inception in 2014. Prior to joining Kenon as Chief Financial Officer, Tzahi Goshen served as the Controller of IC since 2008, which, along with Kenon, is a member of a group of companies associated with the same ultimate beneficiary, Mr. Idan Ofer. Mr. Goshen was responsible for all aspects of ICs financial reporting as a public company. Mr. Goshen also served as the Controller of Gemini Israel Funds Ltd., a venture capital fund, from 2006 to 2008. Mr. Goshen has vast experience in overseeing the corporate financial activities of traded companies, including acquisitions, tax planning, accounting and reporting, and internal auditing. Mr. Goshen holds a Bachelors Degree in Accounting from the College of Management and is a certified public accountant in Israel.
Aviad Kaufman. Mr. Kaufman is the Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Pacific (UK) LLP and is also a board member of IC, Israel Chemicals Ltd. and Kenon, each of which are members of a group of companies associated with the same ultimate beneficiary, Mr. Idan Ofer. From 2008 until 2012, Mr. Kaufman served as Chief Financial Officer of Quantum Pacific Advisory Limited. From 2002 until 2007, Mr. Kaufman served as Director of International Taxation and fulfilled different senior corporate finance roles at Amdocs Ltd. Previously, Mr. Kaufman held various consultancy positions with KPMG. Mr. Kaufman is a certified public accountant and holds a Bachelors Degree in Accounting and Economics from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem (with distinction), and a Masters of Business Administration in Finance from Tel Aviv University.
Javier García-Burgos . Mr. García-Burgos has served as our Chief Executive Officer since 2015, and has served as the Chief Executive Officer of ICP since 2011. Simultaneously, Mr. García-Burgos served as the Chief Executive Officer of Inkia from 2007 to date, Chief Executive Officer of Kallpa from 2005 to 2015 and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Cone from 2002 to 2014. Previously, Mr. García-Burgos served as Regional Director for Globeleq in South America from 2002 to 2007, Planning and Control Vice President of Edegel in 2001, Planning and Control Manager of Edegel from 2000 to 2001, Development Manager of Edegel from 1998 to 2000 and in other positions with Edegel beginning in 1996. Mr. García-Burgos has over 19 years of experience in the energy industry, having served as a board member of approximately 20 power companies in 12 countries. Mr. García-Burgos holds a Bachelors Degree in Aerospace Engineering from San Diego State University and a Masters of Business Administration from Escuela de Administración de Negocios para Graduados (ESAN) in Peru.
Alberto Triulzi . Mr. Triulzi has served as our Chief Financial Officer since 2015 and has served as the Chief Financial Officer of ICP since 2013. Previously, Mr. Triulzi served as Chief Executive Officer of Nejapa and Cenérgica from 2008 to 2013, Chief Finance and Administration Officer of EGE Haina from 2001 to 2008, Chief Financial Officer of Edegel from 1995 to 2001, Vice President and Controller of Edesur S.A. from 1992 to 1995, Project Development Manager for Entergy Corporation from 1988 to 1992, and executive consultant for Stone and Webster Management Consultants from 1983 to 1988. Mr. Triulzi also served as a member of the board of directors of Generandes from 2006 to 2014 and as an alternate member of the board of directors of Edegel from 2006 to 2014. Mr. Triulzi also served as a member of the board of directors of Edesur S.A. from 1995 to 1997, Transener
206
S.A. from 1993 to 1996 and Central Térmica Costanera (Buenos Aires) from 1993 to 1995, and as Chairman of Argelec S.A. in 1994. Mr. Triulzi holds a Bachelors Degree in Economics and a Masters of Business Administration in Finance, both from Loyola University.
Roberto Cornejo . Mr. Cornejo has served as our Chief Operating Officer since 2015, and has served as the Chief Operating Officer of ICP since 2011. Previously, Mr. Cornejo served as the Chief Operating Officer and Commercial Vice President of Inkia from 2007 to 2011, as a Commercial Vice President for Edegel from 2000 to 2007 and as Commercial Manager for Edegel from 1997 to 2000. Mr. Cornejo has over 19 years of experience in the energy industry in Latin America. He holds a Bachelors Degree in Industrial Engineering from the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú and a Masters Degree in Business Administration from the Universidad del Pacífico in Peru.
Juan Carlos Camogliano. Mr. Camogliano has served as our Chief Investment OfficerAmericas since 2015 and has served as the Chief Investment OfficerAmericas since 2011. Mr. Camogliano has also served as the Vice President of Business Development at Inkia since 2008. Previously, Mr. Carmogliano worked at Suez Energy Peru, a member of the Suez Group, as Planning, Project and Business Development Vice President from 2006 to 2007, Planning and Project Vice President from 2004 to 2005, and Commercial Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from 2001 to 2004. He worked in the trading department of Morgan Stanley from 2000 to 2001 and in the commercial and development department of Edegel from 1997 to 2000. Mr. Camogliano has over 17 years of experience in the power industry. He holds a Bachelors Degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Peruvian Navy School and a Masters of Business Administration from Escuela de Administración de Negocios para Graduados (ESAN) in Peru.
Giora Almogy . Mr. Almogy has served as our Chief Investment Officer Europe & Asia since 2015 and has served as the Chief Executive Officer of OPC since 2011 and 2007, respectively. Mr. Almogy has 18 years of experience in economics and business development in the energy industry. Mr. Almogy previously headed the economics department at a leading energy company from 1997 to 2001, and has held various executive positions in the Ofer Group and at IC. Mr. Almogy holds a Bachelors Degree in Economics and a Masters in Business Administration, both from Tel Aviv University.
Frank Sugrañes . Mr. Sugrañes has served as our Chief Technical Officer since 2015, and has served as the Technical Officer of ICP since 2011 and has also served as the Vice President of Production at Inkia since 2009. Previously, he was Senior Director of Operations for Ashmore Energy International, or AEI, responsible for operations worldwide and reporting to the Vice President of Operations, from 2004 to 2009. Additionally, Mr. Sugrañes was assigned to different positions during his tenure at AEI such as General Manager of Pantanal Energia Power Plant in Cuiaba, Brazil from 2002 to 2004 and General Manager of Jamaica Private Power Co. in Kingston, Jamaica from 2008 to 2009. Mr. Sugrañes has close to 25 years of experience in the energy industry. He holds a Bachelors Degree in Civil Engineering and a Masters of Construction Management from Texas A&M University.
Daniel Urbina . Mr. Urbina has served as our General Counsel since 2015, and has served as the General Counsel of ICP for the Americas region since 2011 and has also served as General Counsel of Inkia since 2008. Previously, he served as Vice President and Legal Advisor for the Americas region at Standard Chartered Bank (New York) from 2005 to 2008 and was Head of Legal and Compliance for Standard Chartered Bank Peru from 2000 to 2005. Mr. Urbina also served as legal director of the Ministry of the Presidency of Peru from 1999 to 2000. He holds a Law Degree from the Universidad de Lima in Peru and a Masters in Laws Degree from Columbia University. He is admitted to practice in the state of New York and in Lima, Peru.
Board Practices
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow certain home country corporate governance practices instead of those otherwise required under the NYSEs rules for domestic U.S. issuers, provided that we
207
disclose which requirements we are not following and describe the equivalent home country requirement. Additionally, as Kenon will hold % of our ordinary shares upon completion of the offering (or % if the underwriters exercise in full their option to purchase additional ordinary shares from us), we expect to be a controlled company within the meaning of the corporate governance standards of the NYSE. However, we have elected to apply the corporate governance rules of the NYSE that are applicable to U.S. domestic registrants that are not controlled companies.
Board of Directors
Our articles of association gives our board of directors general powers to manage our business. The board of directors, which consists of directors, and of which Mr. Yoav Doppelt serves as our Chairman, oversees and provides policy guidance on our strategic and business planning processes, oversees the conduct of our business by senior management and is principally responsible for the succession planning for our key executives. Under our articles of association, the number of directors must not be fewer than 5 nor more than 12 persons.
Director Independence . Pursuant to the NYSEs listing standards, listed companies are required to have a majority of independent directors. Under the NYSEs listing standards, (i) a director employed by us or that has, or had, certain relationships with us during the last three years, cannot be deemed to be an independent director, and (ii) directors will qualify as independent only if our board of directors affirmatively determines that they have no material relationship with us, either directly or as a partner, shareholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us. Ownership of a significant amount of our ordinary shares, by itself, does not constitute a material relationship.
Although we are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of the requirement to have a board of directors comprised of a majority of independent directors, we have determined that we are in compliance with this requirement and that a majority of our board of directors is independent according to the NYSEs listing standard. Our board of directors has affirmatively determined that each of , representing of our directors, are currently independent directors as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE.
Election and Removal of Directors. For further information on the election and removal of directors, see Description of Share CapitalMemorandum and Articles of AssociationElection and Re-election of Directors .
Service Contracts . None of our board members has a service contract with us or any of our businesses providing for benefits upon termination of employment.
Indemnifications and Limitations on Liability . For information on the indemnification and limitations on liability of our directors, see Description of Share CapitalMemorandum and Articles of AssociationLimitations of Liability and Indemnification Matters.
Committees of our Board of Directors
We have established three committees, which report regularly to our board of directors on matters relating to the specific areas of risk the committees oversee: the audit committee, the nominating and corporate governance committee and the compensation committee. Although we are permitted to follow home country practices with respect to our establishment of audit, nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees, we have determined that we are in compliance with the NYSEs requirements in these respects.
208
Audit Committee
We have established an audit committee to review and discuss with management significant financial, legal and regulatory risks and the steps management takes to monitor, control and report such exposures; our audit committee also oversees the periodic enterprise-wide risk evaluations conducted by management. Specifically, our audit committee oversees the process concerning:
| the quality and integrity of our financial statements and internal controls; |
| the appointment, compensation, retention, qualifications and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm; |
| the performance of our internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm; |
| our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; and |
| related party transactions. |
At the time of the completion of the offering, the members of our audit committee, , will be independent directors and meet the requirements for financial literacy as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of each of the SEC and the NYSE. Our board of directors has determined that Mr. Laurence N. Charney is an audit committee financial expert, as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC, and that each of our audit committee members will have the requisite financial sophistication as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE. Our audit committee will operate under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of each of the SEC and the NYSE.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Our nominating and corporate governance committee oversees the management of risks associated with board governance, director independence and conflicts of interest. Specifically, our nominating and corporate governance committee is responsible for identifying qualified candidates to become directors, recommending to the board of directors candidates for all directorships, overseeing the annual evaluation of the board of directors and its committees and taking a leadership role in shaping our corporate governance.
Our nominating and corporate governance committee will consider candidates for director who are recommended by its members, by other board members and members of our management, as well as those identified by any third-party search firms retained by it to assist in identifying and evaluating possible candidates. The nominating and corporate governance committee will also consider recommendations for director candidates submitted by our shareholders. The nominating and corporate governance committee will evaluate and recommend to the board of directors qualified candidates for election, re-election or appointment to the board, as applicable.
When evaluating director candidates, the nominating and corporate governance committee seeks to ensure that the board of directors has the requisite skills, experience and expertise and that its members consist of persons with appropriately diverse and independent backgrounds. The nominating and corporate governance committee will consider all aspects of a candidates qualifications in the context of our needs, including: personal and professional integrity, ethics and values; experience and expertise as an officer in corporate management; experience in the industry of any of our portfolio businesses and international business and familiarity with our operations; experience as a board member of another publicly traded company; practical and mature business judgment; the extent to which a candidate would fill a present need on the board of directors; and the other ongoing commitments and obligations of the candidate. However, the nominating and corporate governance committee does not have any minimum criteria for director candidates. Consideration of new director candidates will typically involve a series of internal discussions, review of information concerning candidates and interviews with selected candidates.
209
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of the requirement to have a nominating and corporate governance committee comprised entirely of independent directors. Nonetheless, we have determined that we are in compliance with this requirement and that the members of our nominating and corporate governance committee, , are independent directors as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE. Our nominating and corporate governance committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the NYSE.
Compensation Committee
Our compensation committee assists our board in reviewing and approving the compensation structure of our directors and officers, including all forms of compensation to be provided to our directors and officers. The compensation committee is responsible for, among other things:
| reviewing and determining the compensation package for our Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives; |
| reviewing and making recommendations to our board with respect to the compensation of our non-employee directors; |
| reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives, including evaluating their performance in light of such goals and objectives; and |
| reviewing periodically and approving and administering stock options plans, long-term incentive compensation or equity plans, programs or similar arrangements, annual bonuses, employee pension and welfare benefit plans for all employees, including reviewing and approving the granting of options and other incentive awards. |
As a foreign private issuer, we are permitted to follow home country practice in lieu of the requirement to have a compensation committee comprised entirely of independent directors. Nonetheless, we have determined that we are in compliance with this requirement and that the members of our compensation committee, , are independent directors as defined under the applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE. Our compensation committee operates under a written charter that satisfies the applicable standards of the NYSE.
Code of Ethics and Ethical Guidelines
Our board of directors has adopted a code of ethics that describes our commitment to, and requirements in connection with, ethical issues relevant to business practices and personal conduct.
Compensation
For the year ended December 31, 2014, the aggregate compensation paid (comprising remuneration and the aggregate fair market value of equity awards granted) to our executive officers was approximately $3 million. No amounts in respect of pension, retirement or similar benefits have been accrued in any of the periods presented in this prospectus. We have a competitive compensation structure for our executive officers. Compensation for such executive officers typically consists of a base salary, as well as a year-end bonus, which is based on the personal performance of our executive officer, our performance, and the performance of our businesses.
210
Share Incentive Plan 2015 and Share Option Plan 2015
We will establish the Share Incentive Plan 2015 and the Share Option Plan 2015 for our directors and management. The Share Incentive Plan 2015 and the Share Option Plan 2015 will provide grants of our shares, and stock options in respect of our shares, respectively, to our management and directors, as well as to the directors and officers of our subsidiaries or associated companies, pursuant to awards, which may be granted to such individuals by us from time to time. Such awards may be subject to a vesting period and may be subject to conditions including performance conditions as determined by a committee of our board of directors. The number of shares issuable pursuant to an award may be subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain dilutive events, and we may elect to settle an award in cash. The total number of shares underlying awards which may be granted under the Share Incentive Plan 2015, when adopted, delivered pursuant to the exercise of options granted under the Share Option Plan 2015, when adopted, shall not, in the aggregate, exceed 3% of our total issued shares (excluding treasury shares).
211
The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our ordinary shares outstanding (1) immediately prior to this offering, (2) immediately following the offering, assuming no exercise of the underwriters option to purchase additional ordinary shares, and (3) immediately following the offering, assuming the underwriters option to purchase additional ordinary shares is exercised in full by:
| each person known to us to own beneficially more than 5% of our issued ordinary shares; and |
| each of our directors, director nominees, and executive officers individually and as a group. |
The calculations in the table below are based on shares outstanding as of , 2015 which comprise our entire issued and outstanding share capital as of that date.
Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, we have included shares that the person has the right to acquire within 60 days, including through the exercise of any option, warrant or other right or the conversion of any other security. These shares, however, are not included in the computation of the percentage ownership of any other person.
Prior to this Offering |
After this Offering (Assuming no Exercise of the Underwriters Option) |
After this Offering (Assuming the Underwriters Option is Exercised in Full) |
||||||||||||||
Total
|
Total % of
Share Capital |
Total
|
Total % of
Share Capital |
Total
|
Total % of
Share
|
|||||||||||
Kenon Holdings Ltd. 1 |
100 | % | ||||||||||||||
All directors and executive officers as a group 2 |
| |
1. | Kenon Holdings Ltd. is a publicly traded corporation (NYSE: KEN; TASE: KEN). |
2. | Each individual beneficially owns less than 1% of Kenons ordinary shares. |
212
We are party to numerous related party transactions with certain of our affiliates.
Our audit committee, pursuant to its charter, must review and approve all related party transactions. Our audit committee has a written policy with respect to the approval of related party transactions and considers a number of factors when determining whether to approve a related party transaction, including considering whether the related party transaction is on terms and conditions no less favorable to us than may reasonably be expected in arms-length transactions with unrelated parties.
Set forth below is a summary of our material related party transactions.
Reorganization
Prior to the completion of the offering, our sole shareholder, Kenon, will effect a Reorganization pursuant to which it will transfer to us of all of its equity interests in its wholly-owned subsidiary ICP, free from all encumbrances and together with all applicable, rights, dividends, entitlements and advantages, in exchange for (i) Kenons receipt of our ordinary shares issued for such purpose and (ii) Kenons receipt of a note payable by us to Kenon in an aggregate principal amount of $220 million.
$220 Million Note Payable to Kenon
In connection with the Reorganization, we will issue a note payable to Kenon in an aggregate principal amount of $220 million. The note will bear interest at a rate of LIBOR + 6% per annum from the earlier of June 30, 2016 or 21 days after the completion of this offering, and will mature, unless otherwise prepaid, on December 31, 2016. Among other things, we intend to use a portion of the net proceeds that we receive in this offering to prepay in full all obligations outstanding under this note.
Registration Rights Agreement
In connection with the initial public offering of our ordinary shares, we expect to enter into a registration rights agreement with Kenon with regard to the shares that will be owned by Kenon, as well as in respect of any shares which Kenon may receive or acquire during the term of such agreement (all such shares, the Registrable Securities). Under the registration rights agreement, Kenon will have the right to cause us to register under the Securities Act, and other applicable laws, the offer and sale by Kenon of the Registrable Securities. Subject to the terms and conditions of our registration rights agreement, this registration right will allow Kenon or certain qualified assignees of Kenon holding any Registrable Securities to require registration of such Registrable Securities and to include any such Registrable Securities in a registration by us of ordinary shares, including ordinary shares offered by us or by any other shareholder. In connection with any registration of ordinary shares held by Kenon or certain qualified assignees of Kenon, we will agree to indemnify Kenon and its officers, directors and controlling persons from and against any liabilities under the Securities Act or otherwise arising from the registration statement or prospectus. We will agree to bear all costs and expenses incidental to any registration, excluding any underwriting discounts.
The foregoing summary of the registration rights agreements is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by, the full text of our registration rights agreement with Kenon, a copy of which will be filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and is incorporated by reference herein.
Sales of Electricity and Gas
OPC sells electricity through PPAs to some entities that may be considered to be related parties (as they may be considered to be under common control with it). OPC recorded revenues from related parties in the amount of NIS 279 million (approximately $71 million), NIS 746 million (approximately $208 million) and NIS 347 million (approximately $96 million) in the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. OPC also sells an immaterial amount of gas to some entities that may be considered related parties.
213
Loans from Former Parent
ICP has, in the past, entered into loan agreements with its former parent, IC, pursuant to which it borrowed funds from IC. The interest expenses for these loans were $20 million, $15 million and $13 million in the years 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively; portions of the interest expenses for 2013 and 2012 were capitalized in property, plant and equipment for those periods.
There are currently no loans outstanding to IC.
Transactions with Bank Leumi
Bank Leumi, which holds approximately 14% of Kenons ordinary shares, is the arranger of, and lender under, OPCs NIS 1,800 million (approximately $460 million) financing agreement. Additionally, OPC makes deposits in the ordinary course of its business in a deposit account maintained at Bank Leumi on commercially reasonable terms.
For further information on OPC financing agreement with Bank Leumi, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsMaterial IndebtednessOPC Financing Agreement and the full text of OPC financing agreement, a copy of which will be filed as an exhibit to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part and is incorporated by reference herein.
214
The following is a description of the material terms of our memorandum and articles of association as each will be in effect as of the completion of this offering, and of specific provisions of Singapore law.
Upon the completion of this offering, we will have ordinary shares, no par value, issued and outstanding.
We currently have only one class of issued and outstanding shares, which have identical rights in all respects and rank equally with one another. There is no authorized share capital under Singapore law. There is a provision in our articles of association to enable us in specified circumstances to issue shares with preferential, deferred or other special rights or restrictions as our directors may determine, subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and our articles of association.
All ordinary shares presently issued are fully paid and existing shareholders are not subject to any calls on shares. Although Singapore law does not recognize the concept of non-assessability with respect to newly-issued shares, we note that any purchaser of our ordinary shares who has fully paid up all amounts due with respect to such shares will not be subject under Singapore law to any personal liability to contribute to our assets or liabilities in such purchasers capacity solely as a holder of such shares. We believe that this interpretation is substantively consistent with the concept of non-assessability under most, if not all, U.S. state corporations laws. All shares are in registered form. We cannot, except in the circumstances permitted by the Singapore Companies Act, grant any financial assistance for the acquisition or proposed acquisition of our own shares.
The laws applicable to Singapore-incorporated companies may change as a result of proposed legislative reforms to the Singapore Companies Act. In particular, you should note that on October 8, 2014, the Companies (Amendment) Bill No. 25 of 2014 was passed by the Singapore Parliament and the Companies (Amendment) Act 2014, or the Amendment Act, was gazetted on December 1, 2014. The provisions of the Amendment Act will become effective in two phases. Several of the provisions became effective on July 1, 2015, which we refer to as the First Phase, while the others, which we refer to as the Second Phase, are expected to become effective in the first quarter of 2016. The column on the right in Comparison of Shareholder Rights below sets out the relevant provisions to the Singapore Companies Act upon the Second Phase of the Amendment Act becoming effective.
Memorandum and Articles of Association
The following description of our memorandum and articles of association are summaries and are qualified by reference to our memorandum and articles of association, copies of which will be filed with the SEC.
New Shares
Under Singapore law, new shares may be issued only with the prior approval of our shareholders in a general meeting. General approval may be sought from our shareholders in a general meeting for the issue of shares. Approval, if granted, will lapse at the earlier of:
| the conclusion of the next annual general meeting; |
| the expiration of the period within which the next annual general meeting is required by law to be held ( i.e. , within 18 months from our incorporation date (and in the case of subsequent periods, 15 months)) or six months from our financial year end, being December 31, whichever is earlier; or |
| the subsequent revocation or modification of approval by our shareholders acting at a duly convened general meeting. |
215
Our shareholders have provided such general authority to our directors to issue new shares until the conclusion of our 2016 annual general meeting. Subject to this and the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and our articles of association, all new shares are under the control of the directors who may allot and issue new shares to such persons on such terms and conditions and with the rights and restrictions as they may think fit to impose.
Preference Shares
Our articles of association provide that we may issue shares of a different class with preferential, deferred, qualified or other special rights, privileges or conditions as our board of directors may determine. Under the Singapore Companies Act, our preference shareholders will have the right to attend any general meeting insofar as the circumstances set forth below apply and in a poll at such general meeting, to have at least one vote for every preference share held:
| upon any resolution concerning the winding-up of our Company; |
| upon any resolution which varies the rights attached to such preference shares; or |
| when the dividends to be paid on our preference shares are more than 12 months in arrears, for the period they remain unpaid. |
We may, subject to the prior approval in a general meeting of our shareholders, issue preference shares which are, or at our option, subject to redemption provided that such preference shares may not be redeemed out of capital unless:
| all the directors have made a solvency statement in relation to such redemption; and |
| we have lodged a copy of the statement with the Singapore Registrar of Companies. |
Further, the shares must be fully paid-up before they are redeemed.
Transfer of Ordinary Shares
Subject to applicable securities laws in relevant jurisdictions and our articles of association, our ordinary shares are freely transferable. Shares may be transferred by a duly signed instrument of transfer in any usual or common form or in a form acceptable to our directors. The directors may decline to register any transfer unless, among other things, evidence of payment of any stamp duty payable with respect to the transfer is provided together with other evidence of ownership and title as the directors may require. We will replace lost or destroyed certificates for shares upon notice to us and upon, among other things, the applicant furnishing evidence and indemnity as the directors may require and the payment of all applicable fees.
Election and Re-election of Directors
Under our articles of association, our shareholders may by ordinary resolution, appoint any person to be a director and our board of directors shall have power at any time and from time to time to appoint any person to be a director either to fill a casual vacancy or as an additional director, provided that any person so appointed by our board of directors shall hold office only until the next annual general meeting, and shall then be eligible for re-election.
Our memorandum and articles of association provide that, subject to the Singapore Companies Act, no person other than a director retiring at a general meeting is eligible for appointment as a director at any general meeting, without the recommendation of the Board for election, unless (1) in the case of a member or members who in aggregate hold(s) more than fifty percent of the total number of our issued and paid-up shares (excluding treasury shares), not less than ten days, or (2) in the case of a member or members who in aggregate hold(s) more
216
than five percent of the total number of our issued and paid-up shares (excluding treasury shares), not less than 120 days, before the date of the notice provided to members in connection with the general meeting, a written notice signed by such member or members (other than the person to be proposed for appointment) who (a) are qualified to attend and vote at the meeting for which such notice is given, and (b) have held shares representing the prescribed threshold in (1) or (2) above, for a continuous period of at least one year prior to the date on which such notice is given, is lodged at our registered office. Such a notice must also include the consent of the person nominated.
Shareholders Meetings
We are required to hold an annual general meeting each year. Our first annual general meeting must be held not more than 18 months from our incorporation date and subsequently, not more than 15 months after the holding of the last preceding annual general meeting, in each case, not later than six months from our financial year end, being December 31. We must, on the written request of shareholders representing not less than 5% of the total voting rights of all shareholders having the right to vote at the meeting, or not less than 100 shareholders who have paid up an average sum, per shareholder, of $500, give to our shareholders who are entitled to receive notice of the next annual general meeting (1) notice of any resolution which may properly be moved and is intended to be moved at the meeting; and (2) a statement of not more than 1,000 words with respect to the matter referred to in any proposed resolution or the business to be dealt with at that meeting. A copy of the resolution shall be given to our shareholders in the same manner and, so far as practicable, at the same time as notice of the meeting.
We are not obliged to give notice of the resolution or to circulate any statement unless (1) a copy of the written request is deposited at our registered office (a) in the case of a request requiring notice of a resolution, not less than six weeks before the meeting; and (b) in the case of any other request, not less than one week before the meeting; and (2) there is deposited with the request a sum reasonably sufficient to meet our expenses in giving effect thereto.
We are not required to circulate any statement if the Singapore courts are satisfied, upon our application or of any other person who claims to be aggrieved, that the rights of shareholders to make such requests are being abused to secure needless publicity for defamatory matter.
Additionally, the directors may convene an extraordinary general meeting whenever they think fit, and they must convene an extraordinary general meeting upon the written request of shareholders representing not less than 10% of the paid-up capital as at the date of deposit of the request which carries the right to vote at general meetings (disregarding paid-up capital held as treasury shares)), to propose resolutions to be passed. The request must state the object(s) of the meeting, must be signed by the shareholders requesting the meeting, and must be deposited at our registered office. In addition, two or more shareholders holding not less than one-tenth of our total number of issued shares (excluding our treasury shares) may call a meeting of our shareholders. The Singapore Companies Act requires not less than:
| 14 days written notice to be given by us of a general meeting to pass an ordinary resolution; and |
| 21 days written notice to be given by us of a general meeting to pass a special resolution, |
to every one of our members and to our auditors. Our articles of association further provide that in computing the notice period, both the day on which the notice is served, or deemed to be served, and the day for which the notice is given shall be excluded.
Only registered shareholders of our Company will be entitled to attend, speak and vote at any meeting of shareholders. So long as the ordinary shares that are subject of this offering are held through the Depository Trust Company, or DTC, DTC or its nominee will be registered in our register of shareholders as our shareholder
217
and will be considered our shareholder or member for all purposes under the Singapore Companies Act and our articles of association, and owners of book-entry interests in our shares will not be considered our shareholders or members. Therefore, under the Singapore Companies Act and our articles of association, you will not be recognized as a shareholder of our Company, and do not have a right to attend and to vote at general meetings of our company. Participants must rely on the procedures of DTC through which they own book-entry interests in order to exercise any rights of shareholders under the Singapore Companies Act and our articles of association. Owners of book-entry interests in our shares who wish to become a registered shareholder must (pursuant to the transfer procedures of the broker, bank, nominee, or other institution that holds their shares, as well as the transfer procedures in our articles of association) transfer their interest in us, as represented by their book-entry interests, from DTC or its nominee, to themselves by transferring such shares to an account maintained by Computershare Trust Company, N.A., our transfer agent and registrar. Under our articles of association, such transfer of shares will be effected, and the owner will become a registered shareholder, when the transfer is recorded and the name of the transferee is entered in our register of shareholders as a registered shareholder of the shares which are the subject of the transfer.
Unless otherwise required by law or by our articles of association, voting at general meetings is by ordinary resolution, requiring the affirmative vote of a simple majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the resolution. An ordinary resolution suffices, for example, for appointments of directors. A special resolution, requiring an affirmative vote of not less than three-fourths of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the resolution, is necessary for certain matters under Singapore law, such as an alteration of our articles of association. Proxies need not be shareholders of our Company.
Voting Rights
Voting at any meeting of shareholders is by a show of hands unless a poll is duly demanded before or on the declaration of the result of the show of hands by: (1) the chairman (being a person entitled to vote thereat), (2) at least three shareholders entitled to vote thereat and who are present in person or by proxy or by attorney or, in the case of a corporation, by a representative or (3) at least one shareholder present in person or by proxy or by attorney or, in the case of a corporation, by a representative entitled to vote thereat, in each case (a) representing in the aggregate not less than 10% of the total voting rights of all shareholders having the right to vote at the general meeting or (b) holding in the aggregate not less than 10% of the total number of our paid-up shares (excluding treasury shares). The election of a chairman of a meeting or any adjournment of such meeting may be decided by a show of hands or on a poll. If voting is by a show of hands, every shareholder who is entitled to vote and who is present in person or by proxy at the meeting has one vote. On a poll, every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy or by attorney, or in the case of a corporation, by a representative, has one vote for every share held by him or which he represents. Proxies need not be shareholders. Only those shareholders who are registered in our register of members will be entitled to vote at any meeting of shareholders.
When the Second Phase of the Amendment Act becomes effective, the threshold to demand for a poll at a meeting of a company on any question or matter other than the election of the chairman of the meeting or the adjournment of the meeting will be lowered from 10% to 5% of the total voting rights of the company.
Dividends
From time to time, our board of directors may approve the payment of dividends to our shareholders. Any declaration and payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including our profits, our financial position, earnings, cash flows, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, the progress relating to our strategy plan, statutory and contractual restrictions applicable to the payment of dividends, the conditions prevailing in the market, our overall financial condition, available distributable reserves, and additional factors our board deems appropriate.
218
Under Singapore corporate law, no dividend may be paid except out of profits and we do not expect to have any distributable profits at the time of the completion of the offering. Any dividends would be limited by the amount of available distributable reserves, which, under Singapore law, will be assessed on the basis of our standalone unconsolidated accounts (which will be based upon the SFRS). We expect that the opening balance of our retained earnings in such financials will be zero. However, under Singapore law, it is possible to effect a capital reduction exercise to return cash and/or assets to our shareholders. The completion of a capital reduction exercise may require the approval of the Singapore Courts, and we may not be successful in our attempts to obtain such approval.
Additionally, because we are a holding company, our ability to pay cash dividends, or declare a distribution-in-kind of the ordinary shares of any of our businesses, may be limited by restrictions on our ability to obtain sufficient funds through dividends from our businesses, including restrictions under the terms of the agreements governing the indebtedness of our businesses. Subject to the foregoing, the declaration and payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including our profits, our financial position, earnings, cash flows, capital requirements, level of indebtedness, the progress relating to our strategy plan, statutory and contractual restrictions applicable to the payment of dividends, the conditions prevailing in the market, our overall financial condition, available distributable reserves, and additional factors our board of directors deems appropriate. Generally, a final dividend is declared out of profits disclosed by the accounts presented to the annual general meeting, and requires approval of our shareholders. However, our board of directors can declare interim dividends without the approval of our shareholders.
Bonus and Rights Issues
In a general meeting, our shareholders may, upon the recommendation of the directors, capitalize any reserves or profits and distribute them as fully paid bonus shares to the shareholders in proportion to their shareholdings. Subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and our articles of association, our board of directors may also issue rights to take up additional ordinary shares to our shareholders in proportion to their respective shareholdings. Such rights are subject to any condition attached to such issue and the regulations of any stock exchange on which our ordinary shares are listed, as well as U.S. federal and blue sky securities laws applicable to such issue.
Takeovers
The Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers, the Singapore Companies Act and the SFA regulate, among other things, the acquisition of ordinary shares of Singapore-incorporated public companies. Any person acquiring an interest, whether by a series of transactions over a period of time or not, either on his own or together with parties acting in concert with such person, in 30% or more of our voting shares, or, if such person holds, either on his own or together with parties acting in concert with such person, between 30% and 50% (both amounts inclusive) of our voting shares, and if such person (or parties acting in concert with such person) acquires additional voting shares representing more than 1% of our voting shares in any six-month period, must, except with the consent of the Securities Industry Council in Singapore, extend a mandatory takeover offer for the remaining voting shares in accordance with the provisions of the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers.
Parties acting in concert comprise individuals or companies who, pursuant to an agreement or understanding (whether formal or informal), cooperate, through the acquisition by any of them of shares in a company, to obtain or consolidate effective control of that company. Certain persons are presumed (unless the presumption is rebutted) to be acting in concert with each other. They include:
| a company and its related companies, the associated companies of any of the company and its related companies, companies whose associated companies include any of these companies and any person who has provided financial assistance (other than a bank in the ordinary course of business) to any of the foregoing for the purchase of voting rights; |
219
| a company and its directors (including their close relatives, related trusts and companies controlled by any of the directors, their close relatives and related trusts); |
| a company and its pension funds and employee share schemes; |
| a person and any investment company, unit trust or other fund whose investment such person manages on a discretionary basis but only in respect of the investment account which such person manages; |
| a financial or other professional adviser, including a stockbroker, and its clients in respect of shares held by the adviser and persons controlling, controlled by or under the same control as the adviser and all the funds managed by the adviser on a discretionary basis, where the shareholdings of the adviser and any of those funds in the client total 10% or more of the clients equity share capital; |
| directors of a company (including their close relatives, related trusts and companies controlled by any of such directors, their close relatives and related trusts) which is subject to an offer or where the directors have reason to believe a bona fide offer for the company may be imminent partners; and |
| an individual and such persons close relatives, related trusts, any person who is accustomed to act in accordance with such persons instructions and companies controlled by the individual, such persons close relatives, related trusts or any person who is accustomed to act in accordance with such persons instructions and any person who has provided financial assistance (other than a bank in the ordinary course of business) to any of the foregoing for the purchase of voting rights. |
Subject to certain exceptions, a mandatory takeover offer must be in cash or be accompanied by a cash alternative at not less than the highest price paid by the offeror or parties acting in concert with the offeror during the offer period and within the six months prior to the commencement of the offer period.
Under the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers, where effective control of a company is acquired or consolidated by a person, or persons acting in concert, a general offer to all other shareholders is normally required. An offeror must treat all shareholders of the same class in an offeree company equally. A fundamental requirement is that shareholders in the company subject to the takeover offer must be given sufficient information, advice and time to consider and decide on the offer. These legal requirements may impede or delay a takeover of our Company by a third party.
We expect to submit an application to the Securities Industry Council of Singapore for a waiver from the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers so that the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers will not apply to us (except in the case of a tender offer (within the meaning of the U.S. securities laws) where the U.S. Tier I exemption under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is available and the offeror relies on the Tier I exemption to avoid full compliance with U.S. tender offer regulations) for so long as we are not listed on a securities exchange in Singapore. We will make an appropriate announcement when the result of the application is known.
Liquidations or Other Return of Capital
On a liquidation, dissolution, winding-up or other return of capital, subject to any special rights attaching to any other class of shares, holders of ordinary shares will be entitled to participate in any surplus assets in proportion to their shareholdings.
220
Limitations on Rights to Hold or Vote Ordinary Shares
Except as discussed above under Takeovers , there are no limitations imposed by the laws of Singapore or by our articles of association on the right of non-resident shareholders to hold or vote ordinary shares.
Limitations of Liability and Indemnification Matters
Our articles of association provide that, subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act, every director, auditor, secretary or other officer of our Company and our subsidiaries and affiliates shall be entitled to be indemnified by our Company against all costs, interest, charges, losses, expenses and liabilities incurred by him or her in the execution and discharge of his or her duties (and where he serves at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of any of our subsidiaries or affiliates) or in relation thereto including any liability by him in defending any proceedings, civil or criminal, which relate to anything done or omitted or alleged to have been done or omitted by him as a director, officer or employee or agent of the Company and in which judgment is given in his favour (or the proceedings otherwise disposed of without any finding or admission of any material breach of duty on his part) or in which he is acquitted or in connection with any application under statute for relief from liability in respect of any such act or omission in which relief is granted to him by the court, provided that there is no conflict with the Singapore Companies Act and every other Singapore act for the time being in force concerning companies and affecting our Company. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, no director, secretary or other officer of our Company shall be liable for the acts, receipts, neglects or defaults of any other director or officer or for joining in any receipt or other act for conformity or for any loss or expense happening to our Company through the insufficiency or deficiency of title to any property acquired by order of the directors for or on behalf of our Company or for the insufficiency or deficiency of any security in or upon which any of the moneys of our Company shall be invested or for any loss or damage arising from the bankruptcy, insolvency or tortious act of any person with whom any moneys, securities or effects shall be deposited or left or for any other loss, damage or misfortune whatever which shall happen in the execution of the duties of his or her office or in relation thereto unless the same shall happen through his or her own negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust.
The limitation of liability and indemnification provisions in our articles of association may discourage shareholders from bringing a lawsuit against directors for breach of their fiduciary duties. They may also reduce the likelihood of derivative litigation against directors and officers, even though an action, if successful, might benefit us and our shareholders. A shareholders investment may be harmed to the extent we pay the costs of settlement and damage awards against directors and officers pursuant to these indemnification provisions.
Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to our directors, officers and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, we have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable.
Comparison of Shareholder Rights
We are incorporated under the laws of Singapore. The following discussion summarizes material differences between the rights of holders of our ordinary shares and the rights of holders of the common stock of a typical corporation incorporated under the laws of the state of Delaware which result from differences in governing documents and the laws of Singapore and Delaware, as well as highlights the proposed amendments to the Singapore Companies Act that will take place upon the Second Phase of the Amendment Act becoming effective.
This discussion does not purport to be a complete statement of the rights of holders of our ordinary shares under applicable law in Singapore and our articles of association or the rights of holders of the common stock of a typical corporation under applicable Delaware law and a typical certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
221
The Singapore Companies Act contains the default articles that apply to a Singapore-incorporated company to the extent they are not excluded or modified by a companys articles of association. They provide examples of the common provisions adopted by companies in their articles of association. However, as is the usual practice for companies incorporated in Singapore, we have specifically excluded the application of these provisions in our articles of association, which we refer to below as our articles.
222
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. A typical certificate of incorporation would also provide that if the Delaware General Corporation Law is amended so as to allow further elimination of, or limitations on, director liability, then the liability of directors will be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware General Corporation Law as so amended. | Our articles of association provide that, subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and every other act for the time being in force concerning companies and affecting us, every director, auditor, secretary or other officer of us and our subsidiaries and affiliates shall be entitled to be indemnified by us against all liabilities incurred by him in the execution and discharge of his duties and where he serves at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of any subsidiary or affiliate of ours or in relation thereto, including any liability incurred by him in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, which relate to anything done or omitted or alleged to have been done or omitted by him as an officer or employee of ours, and in which judgment is given in his favor (or the proceedings otherwise disposed of without any finding or admission of any material breach of duty on his part) or in which he is acquitted, or in connection with an application under statute in respect of such act or omission in which relief is granted to him by the court. | |||
Interested Shareholders | ||||
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law generally prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in specified corporate transactions (such as mergers, stock and asset sales, and loans) with an interested stockholder for three years following the time that the stockholder becomes an interested stockholder. Subject to specified exceptions, an interested stockholder is a person or group that owns 15% or more of the | There are no comparable provisions in Singapore with respect to public companies which are not listed on the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited. | Not applicable. |
223
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
corporations outstanding voting stock (including any rights to acquire stock pursuant to an option, warrant, agreement, arrangement or understanding, or upon the exercise of conversion or exchange rights, and stock with respect to which the person has voting rights only), or is an affiliate or associate of the corporation and was the owner of 15% or more of the voting stock at any time within the previous three years.
A Delaware corporation may elect to opt out of, and not be governed by, Section 203 through a provision in either its original certificate of incorporation, or an amendment to its original certificate or bylaws that was approved by majority stockholder vote. With a limited exception, this amendment would not become effective until 12 months following its adoption. |
||||
Removal of Directors | ||||
A typical certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that, subject to the rights of holders of any preferred stock, directors may be removed at any time by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority, or in some instances a supermajority, of the voting power of all of the then outstanding shares entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, voting together as a single class. A certificate of incorporation could also provide that such a right is only exercisable when a director is being removed for cause (removal of a director only for cause is the default rule in the case of a classified board). | According to the Singapore Companies Act, directors of a public company may be removed before expiration of their term of office with or without cause by ordinary resolution (that is a resolution which is passed by a simple majority of those shareholders present and voting in person or by proxy). Notice of the intention to move such a resolution has to be given to us not less than 28 days before the meeting at which it is moved. We shall then give notice of such resolution to our shareholders not less than 14 days before the meeting. Where any director removed in this manner was appointed to represent the interests of any particular class of |
Not applicable.
|
224
225
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
Amendment of Governing Documents | ||||
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, amendments to a corporations certificate of incorporation require the approval of stockholders holding a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the amendment. If a class vote on the amendment is required by the Delaware General Corporation Law, a majority of the outstanding stock of the class is required, unless a greater proportion is specified in the certificate of incorporation or by other provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, the board of directors may amend bylaws if so authorized in the charter. The stockholders of a Delaware corporation also have the power to amend bylaws. | Our memorandum and articles of association may be altered by special resolution (that is a resolution passed by at least a three-fourths majority of the shares entitled to vote, present in person or by proxy at a meeting for which not less than 21 days written notice is given). The board of directors has no right to amend the memorandum or articles of association. | The memorandum and articles of association for companies incorporated after the effective date of the Second Phase of the Amendment Act will be merged as one document, to be known as the Constitution. The memorandum and articles of associations of companies incorporated prior to the effective date of the Second Phase of the Amendment Act are deemed to be merged to form the new Constitution. | ||
Meetings of Shareholders | ||||
Annual and Special Meetings
Typical bylaws provide that annual meetings of stockholders are to be held on a date and at a time fixed by the board of directors. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a special meeting of stockholders may be called by the board of directors or by any other person authorized to do so in the certificate of incorporation or the bylaws.
Quorum Requirements
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporations certificate of incorporation or bylaws can specify the number of shares which constitute the quorum required to conduct business at a meeting, |
Annual General Meetings
All companies are required to hold an annual general meeting once every calendar year. The first annual general meeting must be held within 18 months of our incorporation and subsequently, not more than 15 months may elapse between annual general meetings.
Extraordinary General Meetings
Any general meeting other than the annual general meeting is called an extraordinary general meeting. Two or more members (shareholders) holding not less than 10% of the total number of issued shares (excluding treasury shares) may call an extraordinary general |
Not applicable.
|
226
227
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise) against expenses, including attorneys fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection with the action, suit or proceeding through, among other things, a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the suit or proceeding, if the person:
acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation or, in some circumstances, at least not opposed to its best interests; and
in a criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.
Delaware corporate law permits indemnification by a corporation under similar circumstances for expenses (including attorneys fees) actually and reasonably incurred by such persons in connection with the defense or settlement of a derivative action or suit, except that no indemnification may be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which the person is adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless the Delaware Court of Chancery or the court in which the action or suit was brought determines upon application that the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for the expenses which the court deems to be proper.
To the extent a director, officer, employee or agent is successful in the defense of such an action, suit or |
purchase and maintain for any officer insurance against any liability which by law would otherwise attach to such officer in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which such officer may be guilty in relation to us;
indemnify such officer or auditor against any liability incurred by such officer or auditor in defending any proceedings (whether civil or criminal) in which judgment is given in such officers favor or in which such officer is acquitted; or
indemnify such officer or auditor against any liability incurred by such officer or auditor in connection with any application under specified sections of the Singapore Companies Act in which relief is granted to such officer or auditor by a court.
In cases where, inter alia, an officer is sued by us, the Singapore Companies Act gives the court the power to relieve directors either wholly or partially from the consequences of their negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust. However, Singapore case law has indicated that such relief will not be granted to a director who has benefited as a result of his or her breach of trust. In order for relief to be obtained, it must be shown that (1) the director acted reasonably; (2) the director had acted honestly; |
convicted, (4) in civil proceedings brought by the company or a related company in which judgment is given against the officer, or (5) in connection with an application for a relief from liability in which the court refuses to grant the officer relief. The Company will also be allowed to provide funds to its directors to meet expenditures incurred or to be incurred by the director, or to enable him or her to avoid incurring expenditure in defending himself or herself in connection with any alleged negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust by him or her in relation to the Company: (1) in any criminal or civil proceedings, (2) in any investigation by a regulatory authority, (3) against any action proposed to be taken by a regulatory authority, or (4) in connection with an application for relief.
|
228
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
proceeding, the corporation is required by Delaware corporate law to indemnify such person for reasonable expenses incurred thereby. Expenses (including attorneys fees) incurred by such persons in defending any action, suit or proceeding may be paid in advance of the final disposition of such action, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of that person to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined that that person is not entitled to be so indemnified. |
and (3) it is fair, having regard to all the circumstances of the case including those connected with such directors appointment, to excuse the director.
Our articles of association provide that, subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act and every other act for the time being in force concerning companies and affecting us, every director, auditor, secretary or other officer of ours and our subsidiaries and affiliates shall be entitled to be indemnified by us against all costs, interest, charges, losses, expenses and liabilities incurred by him in the execution and discharge of his duties and where he serves at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of any subsidiary or affiliate of ours or in relation thereto, including any liability incurred by him in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, which relate to anything done or omitted or alleged to have been done or omitted by him as a director, officer or employee or agent of ours, and in which judgment is given in his favor (or the proceedings otherwise disposed of without any finding or admission of any material breach of duty on his part) or in which he is acquitted, or in connection with an application under statute in respect of such act or omission in which relief is granted to him by the court. |
229
230
231
232
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
capital represented by the issued and outstanding stock of all classes having a preference upon the distribution of assets.
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, any corporation may purchase or redeem its own shares, except that generally it may not purchase or redeem these shares |
of association provide that no dividend may be paid otherwise than out of our profits.
Acquisition of a companys own shares
The Singapore Companies Act generally prohibits a company from acquiring its own shares |
company may purchase or sell shares for the sole purpose of rounding off any odd-lots which he owns, and if the giving of the assistance will not materially prejudice the interests of the company or its shareholders, or the companys ability to pay its creditors subject to the company satisfying certain conditions that | ||
if the capital of the corporation is impaired at the time or would become impaired as a result of the redemption. A corporation may, however, purchase or redeem out of capital shares that are entitled upon any distribution of its assets to a preference over another class or series of its shares if the shares are to be retired and the capital reduced. |
subject to certain exceptions. Any contract or transaction by which a company acquires or transfers its own shares is void. However, provided that it is expressly permitted to do so by our articles of association and subject to the special conditions of each permitted acquisition contained in the Singapore Companies Act, we may:
redeem redeemable preference shares (the redemption of these shares will not reduce our capital). Preference shares may be redeemed out of capital if all the directors make a solvency statement in relation to such redemption in accordance with the Singapore Companies Act;
whether or not we are listed on a securities exchange in Singapore or any securities exchange outside of Singapore, make an off-market purchase of our own shares if off-market purchase is made in accordance with an equal access scheme authorized |
are prescribed in the Singapore Companies Act. |
233
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
in advance at a general meeting; and
whether or not we are listed on a securities exchange in Singapore or any securities exchange outside Singapore, make a purchase or an acquisition of our own shares under a contingent purchase contract which has been authorized in advance at a general meeting by a special resolution. |
||||
We may also purchase our own shares by an order of a Singapore court.
The total number of ordinary shares that may be acquired by us in a relevant period may not exceed 20% of the total number of ordinary shares in that class as of the date of our last annual general meeting held before any resolution pursuant to the relevant share repurchase provisions under the Singapore Companies Act or as of the date of the resolution to acquire the shares, whichever is higher. Where, however, we have reduced our share capital by a special resolution or a Singapore court made an order to such effect, the total number of ordinary shares shall be taken to be the total number of ordinary shares in that class as altered by the special resolution or the order of the court. Payment must be made out of our distributable profits or capital, provided that we are solvent and we do not expect to have any distributable profits at the time of the completion of the offering.
|
234
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
Financial assistance for the acquisition of shares
Under the Singapore Companies Act, a public company may not give financial assistance to any person whether directly or indirectly for the purpose of:
the acquisition or proposed acquisition of our ordinary shares or units of such shares; or
|
||||
the acquisition or proposed acquisition of shares in our holding company or units of such shares.
Financial assistance may take the form of a loan, the giving of a guarantee, the provision of security, the release of an obligation, the release of a debt or otherwise.
However, it should be noted that we may provide financial assistance for the acquisition of our ordinary shares or shares in our holding company if it complies with the requirements (including approval by special resolution) set out in the Singapore Companies Act. Our articles provide that subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act, we may purchase or otherwise acquire our own shares upon such terms and in such manner as we may from time to time think fit. These shares may be held as treasury shares or cancelled as provided in the Singapore Companies Act or dealt with in such manner as may be permitted under the Singapore Companies Act. On cancellation of the shares, the rights and privileges attached to those shares will expire. |
235
236
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
proposed transaction relates to any loan to us, no disclosure need be made where the director has only guaranteed or joined in guaranteeing the repayment of such loan, unless our articles of association provide otherwise.
Further, where the proposed transaction is to be made with or for the benefit of a related corporation ( i.e. the holding company, subsidiary or subsidiary of a common holding company) no disclosure need be made of the fact that the director is also a director of that corporation, unless our articles of association provide otherwise.
Subject to specified exceptions, the Singapore Companies Act prohibits us from making a loan to our directors or to directors of a related corporation, or giving a guarantee or security in connection with such a loan. Companies are also prohibited from making loans to its directors spouse or children (whether adopted or naturally or stepchildren), or giving a guarantee or security in connection with such a loan. |
||||
Dissenters Rights | ||||
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a stockholder of a corporation participating in some types of major corporate transactions may, under varying circumstances, be entitled to appraisal rights pursuant to which the stockholder may receive cash in the amount of the fair market value of his or her shares in lieu of the consideration he or she would otherwise receive in the transaction. | There are no equivalent provisions under the Singapore Companies Act. | Not applicable. |
237
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
Cumulative Voting | ||||
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, a corporation may adopt in its certificate of incorporation that its directors shall be elected by cumulative voting. When directors are elected by cumulative voting, a stockholder has the number of votes equal to the number of shares held by such stockholder times the number of directors nominated for election. The stockholder may cast all of such votes for one director or among the directors in any proportion. | There is no equivalent provision under the Singapore Companies Act in respect of companies incorporated in Singapore. | Not applicable. | ||
Anti-Takeover Measures | ||||
Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, the certificate of incorporation of a corporation may give the board the right to issue new classes of preferred stock with voting, conversion, dividend distribution, and other rights to be determined by the board at the time of issuance, which could prevent a takeover attempt and thereby preclude shareholders from realizing a potential premium over the market value of their shares. | The articles of association of a Singapore company typically provide that the company may allot and issue new shares of a different class with preferential, deferred, qualified or other special rights as its board of directors may determine with the prior approval of the companys shareholders in a general meeting. Our articles of association provide that our shareholders may grant to our board the general authority to issue such preference shares until the next general meeting. For further information, see Risk FactorsRisks Related to our Corporate StructureOur directors have general authority to allot and issue new shares on terms and conditions and with any preferences, rights or restrictions as may be determined by our board of directors in its sole discretion, and Description of Share CapitalMemorandum and Articles of AssociationPreference Shares. | Not applicable. |
238
Delaware |
SingaporeIC Power Pte. Ltd. |
Amendments becoming effective
|
||
In addition, Delaware law does not prohibit a corporation from adopting a stockholder rights plan, or poison pill, which could prevent a takeover attempt and also preclude shareholders from realizing a potential premium over the market value of their shares. |
Singapore law does not generally prohibit a corporation from adopting poison pill arrangements which could prevent a takeover attempt and also preclude shareholders from realizing a potential premium over the market value of their shares.
However, under the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers, if, in the course of an offer, or even before the date of the offer, the board of the offeree company has reason to believe that a bona fide offer is imminent, the board must not, except pursuant to a contract entered into earlier, take any action, without the approval of shareholders at a general meeting, on the affairs of the offeree company that could effectively result in any bona fide offer being frustrated or the shareholders being denied an opportunity to decide on its merits.
For further information on the Singapore Code on Take-overs and Mergers, including information relating to an application we expect to submit to the Securities Industry Council of Singapore; see Description of Share CapitalMemorandum and Articles of AssociationTakeovers . |
Exchange Listing
We are in the process of applying for the listing of our ordinary shares on the NYSE under the ticker symbol ICP.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our ordinary shares is Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
239
SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
We are issuing ordinary shares in this offering, assuming no exercise of the underwriters option to purchase additional shares, representing approximately % of our total outstanding ordinary shares (after giving effect to this offering). All of the ordinary shares sold in this offering will be freely transferable by persons other than our affiliates without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act. Sales of substantial amounts of our ordinary shares in the public market could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our ordinary shares. Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our ordinary shares, and although we are in the process of applying to list our ordinary shares on the NYSE, we cannot assure you that a regular trading market will develop in the ordinary shares.
Lock-up Agreements
We, our executive officers and directors and Kenon, our controlling shareholder, have entered into lock-up agreements. Pursuant to such lock-up agreements, such persons have agreed that, subject to certain exceptions, from the date of this prospectus continuing through the date 180 days after the date of this prospectus, they will not offer, pledge, sell, agree to sell, directly or indirectly, or otherwise dispose of any ordinary shares or any securities convertible or exchangeable for our ordinary shares, without the prior written consent of the representatives.
Rule 144
All of our ordinary shares outstanding prior to this offering may be sold publicly in the United States only if they are subject to an effective registration statement under the Securities Act or pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirement such as those provided by Rule 144 and Rule 701 promulgated under the Securities Act. In general, under Rule 144 as currently in effect, beginning 90 days after the date of this prospectus, a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who at the time of a sale is not, and has not been during the three months preceding the sale, an affiliate of us and, in the case of our ordinary shares that are restricted securities, has beneficially owned our restricted securities for at least six months will be entitled to sell the restricted securities without registration under the Securities Act, subject only to the availability of current public information about us, and will be entitled to sell restricted securities beneficially owned for at least one year without restriction. Persons who are our affiliates and have beneficially owned our restricted securities for at least six months may sell within any three-month period a number of restricted securities that does not exceed the greater of the following:
| 1% of the number of our ordinary shares then outstanding which will equal approximately shares immediately after this offering, assuming the underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase additional ordinary shares; and |
| the average weekly trading volume of our ordinary shares on the NYSE during the four calendar weeks preceding the date on which notice of the sale is filed with the SEC. |
Sales by our affiliates under Rule 144 are also subject to certain requirements relating to manner of sale, notice and the availability of current public information about us.
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701 under the Securities Act as currently in effect, each of our employees, consultants or advisors who purchases our ordinary shares from us in connection with a compensatory stock plan or other written agreement executed prior to the completion of this offering is eligible to resell such ordinary shares in reliance on Rule 144 under the Securities Act, but without compliance with some of the restrictions, including the holding period, contained in Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
240
Registration Rights Agreement
In connection with the initial public offering of our ordinary shares, we expect to enter into a registration rights agreement with Kenon with regard to the shares that will be owned by Kenon, as well as in respect of any shares which Kenon may receive or acquire during the term of such agreement (all such shares, the Registrable Securities). Under the registration rights agreement, Kenon will have the right to cause us to register under the Securities Act, and other applicable laws, the offer and sale by Kenon of the Registrable Securities. Subject to the terms and conditions of our registration rights agreement, this registration right will allow Kenon or certain qualified assignees of Kenon holding any Registrable Securities to require registration of such Registrable Securities and to include any such Registrable Securities in a registration by us of ordinary shares, including ordinary shares offered by us or by any other shareholder. In connection with any registration of ordinary shares held by Kenon or certain qualified assignees of Kenon, we will agree to indemnify Kenon and its officers, directors and controlling persons from and against any liabilities under the Securities Act or otherwise arising from the registration statement or prospectus. We will agree to bear all costs and expenses incidental to any registration, excluding any underwriting discounts.
The foregoing summary of the registration rights agreements is subject to, and is qualified in its entirety by, the full text of our registration rights agreement with Kenon, a copy of which will be filed as an exhibit to this prospectus.
241
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The following discussion is a summary of U.S. federal income tax considerations generally applicable to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares under the United States Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code. Unless otherwise stated, this description addresses only the U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S. Holders (as defined below) that are initial purchasers of our ordinary shares pursuant to the offering and that will hold such ordinary shares as capital assets (generally, property held for investment). This description does not address tax considerations applicable to holders that may be subject to special tax rules, including, without limitation:
| banks, financial institutions or insurance companies; |
| real estate investment trusts, regulated investment companies or grantor trusts; |
| dealers or traders in securities, commodities or currencies; |
| tax-exempt entities or organizations, including individual retirement accounts; |
| certain former citizens or long-term residents of the U.S.; |
| persons that received our ordinary shares as compensation for the performance of services; |
| persons that will hold our ordinary shares as part of a hedging, integrated or conversion transaction or as a position in a straddle for U.S. federal income tax purposes; |
| entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax purposes or other pass-through entities, or holders that will hold our ordinary shares through such an entity; |
| U.S. Holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. Dollar; or |
| holders that own or have owned directly or indirectly 10.0% or more of the voting power or value of our ordinary shares. |
Moreover, this description does not address the U.S. federal estate, gift or alternative minimum tax consequences, or any state, local or foreign tax consequences, of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares.
This description is based on the Code existing, proposed and temporary U.S. Treasury Regulations and judicial and administrative interpretations thereof, in each case as in effect and available on the date hereof. All of the foregoing is subject to change, which change could apply retroactively and could affect the tax consequences described below. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, may take a different position concerning the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares and such a position may be sustained. Holders should consult their tax advisers concerning the U.S. federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences of purchasing, owning and disposing of our ordinary shares in their particular circumstances.
For purposes of this description, a U.S. Holder is a beneficial owner of our ordinary shares that, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, is:
| a citizen or resident of the U.S.; |
| an entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S. or any state thereof, including the District of Columbia; |
242
| an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or |
| a trust if such trust has validly elected to be treated as a U.S. person for U.S. federal income tax purposes or if (1) a court within the U.S. is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and (2) one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of such trust. |
If an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds our ordinary shares, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Such a partner or partnership should consult its tax advisor as to the particular U.S. federal income tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of our ordinary shares in its particular circumstance.
Unless otherwise indicated, this discussion assumes that the Company is not, and will not become, a passive foreign investment company, or a PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations below.
YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF ACQUIRING, OWNING AND DISPOSING OF OUR ORDINARY SHARES.
Distributions
The gross amount of any distribution made to U.S. Holders with respect to our ordinary shares before reduction for any Singaporean taxes withheld therefrom will generally be includible in income as ordinary dividend income to the extent such distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and profits as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. To the extent that the amount of any distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, it will be treated first as a tax-free return of basis in our ordinary shares and thereafter as capital gain. We do not expect to maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles. Therefore, U.S. Holders should expect that the entire amount of any distribution generally will be reported as ordinary dividend income. Non-corporate U.S. Holders may qualify for the lower rates of taxation applicable to qualified dividend income provided that such Holders satisfy holding period requirements and do not engage in hedging transactions, and provided that the Company is not a PFIC for the taxable year in which it pays a dividend, or during the preceding taxable year. Dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction generally allowed to corporate U.S. Holders.
Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Ordinary Shares
U.S. Holders will recognize gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our ordinary shares equal to the difference between the amount realized on such sale, exchange or other disposition and their adjusted tax basis in our ordinary shares, which gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if the shares were held for more than one year at the time of disposition. The adjusted tax basis in an ordinary share generally will be equal to the cost of such ordinary share. Long-term capital gains are generally eligible for a preferential rate of taxation for certain non-corporate U.S. Holders. The deductibility of capital losses for U.S. federal income tax purposes is subject to limitations under the Code.
Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations
If we were to be classified as a PFIC in any taxable year, a U.S. Holder would be subject to special rules generally intended to reduce or eliminate any benefits from the deferral of U.S. federal income tax that a U.S. Holder could derive from investing in a non-U.S. company that does not distribute all of its earnings on a current basis.
243
A non-U.S. corporation will be classified as a PFIC for federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in which, after applying certain look-through rules with respect to the income and assets of subsidiaries, either:
| at least 75% of its gross income is passive income; or |
| at least 50% of the average quarterly value of its total gross assets is attributable to assets that produce passive income or are held for the production of passive income. |
Passive income for this purpose generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents, gains from commodities and securities transactions, and the excess of gains over losses from the disposition of assets which produce passive income. If a non-U.S. corporation owns at least 25% by value of the stock of another corporation, the non-U.S. corporation is treated for purposes of the PFIC tests as owning its proportionate share of the assets of the other corporation and as receiving directly its proportionate share of the other corporations income. For publicly traded corporations, the PFIC asset test described above is applied using the fair market value of the non-U.S. corporations assets. If we are classified as a PFIC in any year with respect to which a U.S. Holder owns our ordinary shares, we will generally continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder in all succeeding years during which the U.S. Holder owns our ordinary shares, regardless of whether we continue to meet the tests described above, unless certain elections are made by the U.S. Holder.
Based on our analysis of our source and amounts of our gross income, the composition of our gross assets, our intended use of proceeds of this offering, and the nature of our business, we believe that we were not a PFIC for the taxable year ended December 31, 2014, and do not expect to be classified as a PFIC for the taxable year ending December 31, 2015. However, because PFIC status is based on our income, assets and activities for the entire taxable year, it is not possible to determine whether we will be characterized as a PFIC for the 2015 taxable year until after the close of the taxable year. Moreover, we must determine our PFIC status annually based on tests which are factual in nature, and our status in future years will depend on our income, assets and activities in each of those years, including, potentially, on how quickly we are able to utilize the cash proceeds from this offering in our business. Furthermore, because the value of our gross assets is likely to be determined in large part by reference to our market capitalization, a decline in the value of our ordinary shares may result in our becoming a PFIC. There can be no assurance that we will not be considered a PFIC for any taxable year.
If a U.S. Holder owns ordinary shares during any year in which we are a PFIC, the U.S. Holder generally will be required to file an IRS Form 8621 (Information Return by a Shareholder of a Passive Foreign Investment Company or Qualified Electing Fund) with respect to the company, generally with the U.S. Holders federal income tax return for that year.
If we were a PFIC, certain information reporting consequences may apply and certain elections (including a mark-to-market election) may be available to U.S. holders with respect to our ordinary shares that may mitigate some of the adverse tax consequences resulting from PFIC treatment. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding whether we are a PFIC and the potential application of the PFIC rules.
Foreign Asset Reporting
Individual U.S. Holders with over $50,000 in foreign financial assets may be required to report information relating to an interest in our ordinary shares by filing IRS Form 8938 (Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets) with their federal income tax return. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding their information reporting obligations, if any, with respect to their ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares.
Non-U.S. Holders
A Non-U.S. Holder is a beneficial owner of our ordinary shares that is neither a U.S. Holder nor an entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
244
A non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on dividends received on ordinary shares, unless such holder conducts a trade or business in the U.S. and such income is effectively connected with that trade or business (or, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, the dividends are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base that such holder maintains in the U.S.).
A non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on any gain realized on the sale or exchange of such ordinary shares unless:
| such gain is effectively connected with conduct of a trade or business in the U.S. (or, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, the gain is attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base that such holder maintains in the U.S.); or |
| such holder is an individual and has been present in the U.S. for 183 days or more in the taxable year of such sale or exchange, and certain other conditions are met. |
THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION IS NOT INTENDED TO CONSTITUTE A COMPLETE ANALYSIS OF ALL TAX CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR ORDINARY SHARES. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR TAX ADVISOR CONCERNING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF YOUR PARTICULAR SITUATION.
Material Singapore Tax Considerations
The following discussion is a summary of Singapore income tax, goods and services tax, or GST and stamp duty considerations relevant to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares by an investor who is not tax resident or domiciled in Singapore and who does not carry on business or otherwise have a presence in Singapore. The statements made herein regarding taxation are general in nature and based upon certain aspects of the current tax laws of Singapore and administrative guidelines issued by the relevant authorities in force as of the date hereof and are subject to any changes in such laws or administrative guidelines or the interpretation of such laws or guidelines occurring after such date, which changes could be made on a retrospective basis. The statements made herein do not purport to be a comprehensive or exhaustive description of all of the tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to acquire, own or dispose of our ordinary shares and do not purport to deal with the tax consequences applicable to all categories of investors, some of which (such as dealers in securities) may be subject to special rules. Prospective shareholders are advised to consult their own tax advisers as to the Singapore or other tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership of or disposal of our ordinary shares, taking into account their own particular circumstances. The statements below are based upon the assumption that we are tax resident in Singapore for Singapore income tax purposes. It is emphasized that neither we nor any other persons involved in this registration statement accepts responsibility for any tax effects or liabilities resulting from the acquisition, holding or disposal of our ordinary shares.
Income Taxation Under Singapore Law
Dividends with Respect to Ordinary Shares
Under the one-tier corporate tax system which currently applies to all Singapore tax resident companies, tax on corporate profits is final, and dividends paid by a Singapore tax resident company will be exempt from further Singapore tax in the hands of a shareholder, whether or not the shareholder is a company or an individual and whether or not the shareholder is a Singapore tax resident.
Capital Gains upon Disposition of Ordinary Shares
Under Singapores territorial basis of taxation, only income which is sourced in Singapore or received in Singapore from outside Singapore (foreign-sourced) will fall within Singapores income tax net.
245
There is no capital gains tax in Singapore. There are no specific laws or regulations which deal with the characterization of whether a gain is income or capital in nature. Gains arising from the disposal of our ordinary shares may be construed to be of an income nature and subject to Singapore income tax, if they arise from activities which the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore regards as the carrying on of a trade or business in Singapore. However, under Singapore income tax laws, any gains derived by a divesting company from its disposal of ordinary shares in an investee company between June 1, 2012 and May 31, 2017 (both dates inclusive) are generally not taxable if immediately prior to the date of the relevant disposal, the investing company has held at least 20% of the ordinary shares in the investee company for a continuous period of at least 24 months.
Notwithstanding the above, with respect to gains on disposal derived by foreign investors, there may be grounds to support an offshore claim (so that such claims will not be subject to Singapore income tax) if: (1) the foreign investor is not a tax resident in Singapore; (2) the foreign investor does not maintain a permanent establishment in Singapore, to which the divestment gains may effectively be connected; and (3) the entire process (including the negotiation, deliberation, execution of the acquisition and sale, etc.) leading up to the actual acquisition and sale of the shares is performed outside of Singapore.
Goods and Services Tax
The issue or transfer of ownership of our ordinary shares would be exempt from Singapore GST. Hence, the holders would not incur any GST on the subscription or subsequent transfer of the shares.
Stamp Duty
Where our ordinary shares evidenced in certificated forms are disposed of and the instrument of transfer is executed in Singapore, stamp duty is payable on the instrument of transfer at the rate of 0.2% of the consideration for or market value of our ordinary shares, whichever is higher.
Where such instrument of transfer is executed outside Singapore or no instrument of transfer is executed, no stamp duty is payable on the acquisition of our ordinary shares. However, stamp duty will be payable if such instrument of transfer is executed outside Singapore and is received in Singapore.
The instrument of transfer for our ordinary shares evidenced in certificated forms must be stamped within 14 days of execution if such instrument of transfer is executed in Singapore, or, within 30 days after receiving such instrument of transfer in Singapore if such instrument of transfer is executed outside of Singapore. The stamp duty is borne by the purchaser unless there is an agreement to the contrary.
However, on the basis that any transfer instruments in respect of our ordinary shares traded on the NYSE are executed outside Singapore through our transfer agent and share registrar in the United States for registration in our branch share register maintained in the United States (without any transfer instruments being received in Singapore), there should be no stamp duty payable in Singapore on such transfers.
Tax Treaties Regarding Withholding Taxes
There is no comprehensive avoidance of double taxation agreement between the United States and Singapore which applies to withholding taxes on dividends or capital gains.
246
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC are acting as representatives, or the representatives, of each of the underwriters named below. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in an underwriting agreement, we have agreed to sell to the underwriters, and each of the underwriters has agreed, severally and not jointly, to purchase from us, the number of our ordinary shares set forth opposite its name below.
Underwriter |
Number
|
|
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith
|
||
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC |
||
Goldman, Sachs & Co. |
||
UBS Securities LLC |
||
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. |
||
Scotia Capital (USA) Inc. |
||
Credicorp Capital Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A. (1) |
||
|
||
Total |
||
|
(1) | Credicorp Capital Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A., one of the underwriters, is not a broker-dealer registered with the SEC and therefore may not make sales of our ordinary shares in the United States or to U.S. persons. To the extent that Credicorp Capital Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A. intends to make sales of our ordinary shares, it will only make such sales outside the United States to certain non-U.S. persons. |
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the underwriting agreement, the underwriters have agreed, severally and not jointly, to purchase all of our ordinary shares sold under the underwriting agreement if any of these ordinary shares are purchased. If an underwriter defaults, the underwriting agreement provides that the purchase commitments of the non-defaulting underwriters may be increased or the underwriting agreement may be terminated.
We and ICP have agreed to indemnify the several underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act, or to contribute to payments the underwriters may be required to make in respect of those liabilities.
The underwriters are offering our ordinary shares, subject to prior sale, when, as and if issued to and accepted by them, subject to approval of legal matters by their counsel, including the validity of our ordinary shares, and other conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, such as the receipt by the underwriters of officers certificates and legal opinions. The underwriters reserve the right to withdraw, cancel or modify offers to the public and to reject orders in whole or in part.
In connection with any offers and sales of our ordinary shares, the underwriters may offer and sell our ordinary shares outside the United States through any of their respective affiliates that are qualified to make offers and sales of securities in jurisdictions outside the United States.
Commissions and Discounts
The representatives have advised us that the underwriters propose initially to offer our ordinary shares to the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover page of this prospectus and to dealers at that price less a concession not in excess of $ per ordinary share. After the initial offering, the public offering price, concession or any other term of the offering may be changed.
247
The following table shows the public offering price, underwriting discount and proceeds before expenses to us. The information assumes either no exercise or full exercise by the underwriters of their option to purchase additional ordinary shares.
Per Ordinary Share |
Without Option |
With Option |
||||||||||
Public offering price |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Underwriting discount |
$ | $ | $ | |||||||||
Proceeds, before expenses, to IC Power |
$ | $ | $ |
The expenses of the offering, not including the underwriting discount, are estimated at $ and are payable by us.
Option to Purchase Additional Ordinary Shares
We have granted an option to the underwriters, exercisable for 30 days after the date of this prospectus, to purchase up to additional ordinary shares at the public offering price, less the underwriting discount. If the underwriters exercise this option, each will be obligated, subject to conditions contained in the underwriting agreement, to purchase a number of additional ordinary shares proportionate to that underwriters initial amount reflected in the above table.
No Sales of Similar Securities
We, our controlling shareholder, Kenon, and our executive officers and directors have agreed not to sell or transfer any of our ordinary shares or securities convertible into, exchangeable for, exercisable for, or repayable with our ordinary shares, for 180 days after the date of this prospectus without first obtaining the prior written consent of the representatives. Specifically, we and these other persons have agreed, with certain limited exceptions, not to directly or indirectly:
| offer, pledge, sell or contract to sell any of our ordinary shares; |
| sell any option or contract to purchase any of our ordinary shares; |
| purchase any option or contract to sell any of our ordinary shares; |
| grant any option, right or warrant to purchase any of our ordinary shares; |
| lend or otherwise dispose of or transfer any of our ordinary shares; |
| exercise any right with respect to the registration of our ordinary shares or file or cause to be filed any registration statement under the Securities Act related to our ordinary shares; or |
| enter into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, the economic consequence of ownership of any of our ordinary shares; |
in each case, whether any such swap or transaction is to be settled by delivery of our ordinary shares or other securities, in cash or otherwise.
This lock-up provision applies to our ordinary shares and to securities convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for or repayable with our ordinary shares. It also applies to our ordinary shares owned now or acquired later by the person subject to this lock-up provision or for which the person subject to this lock-up provision later acquires the power of disposition.
248
This lock-up provision does not apply to the following:
| the sale of our ordinary shares to the underwriters in the offering; |
| transfers of our ordinary shares: (1) as a bona fide gift or gifts; (2) to any trust for the direct or indirect benefit of the transferor or their immediate family (for purposes of this provision, immediate family shall mean any relationship by blood, marriage or adoption, not more remote than first cousin); (3) as a distribution to limited partners or stockholders of the transferor; or (4) to the affiliates of or to any investment fund or other entity controlled or managed by the transferor; provided in each case that (i) the representatives receive a signed lock-up agreement for the balance of the lock-up period from each donee, trustee, distributee, or transferee, (ii) any such transfer shall not involve a disposition for value, and (iii) no public filing or report by any party (including, the donor, the donee, transferor or transferee) under the Exchange Act or any other U.S., state or foreign securities laws or regulations or other public announcement in any jurisdiction shall be required or shall be made voluntarily regarding such transfer; and |
| sales of our ordinary shares acquired in open market transactions after completion of this offering; provided that no public filing or report by any party (including the transferor or transferee under the Exchange Act or any other U.S., state or foreign securities laws or regulations or other public announcement in any jurisdiction shall be required or shall be made voluntarily regarding such sales. |
New York Stock Exchange Listing
We intend to apply to list our ordinary shares on the NYSE, under the symbol ICP. In order to meet the requirements for listing on that exchange, the underwriters have undertaken to sell a minimum number of our ordinary shares to a minimum number of beneficial owners as required by that exchange.
Before this offering, there has been no public market for our ordinary shares. The initial public offering price will be determined through negotiations among us and the underwriters. In addition to prevailing market conditions, the factors to be considered in determining the initial public offering price are
| the valuation multiples of publicly traded companies that the underwriters believe to be comparable to us, |
| our financial information, |
| the history of, and the prospects for, our Company and the industry in which we compete, |
| an assessment of our management, its past and present operations, and the prospects for, and timing of, our future revenues, |
| the present state of our development, and |
| the above factors in relation to market values and various valuation measures of other companies engaged in activities similar to ours. |
An active trading market for our ordinary shares may not develop. It is also possible that after the offering our ordinary shares will not trade in the public market at or above the initial public offering price.
The underwriters do not expect to sell more than 5% of our ordinary shares in the aggregate to accounts over which they exercise discretionary authority.
Price Stabilization, Short Positions and Penalty Bids
Until the distribution of our ordinary shares is completed, SEC rules may limit underwriters and selling group members from bidding for and purchasing our ordinary shares. However, the representatives may engage in transactions that stabilize the price of our ordinary shares, such as bids or purchases to peg, fix or maintain that price.
249
In connection with the offering, the underwriters may purchase and sell our ordinary shares in the open market. These transactions may include short sales, purchases on the open market to cover positions created by short sales and stabilizing transactions. Short sales involve the sale by the underwriters of a greater number of our ordinary shares than they are required to purchase in the offering. Covered short sales are sales made in an amount not greater than the underwriters option to purchase additional ordinary shares described above. The underwriters may close out any covered short position by either exercising their option to purchase additional ordinary shares or purchasing our ordinary shares in the open market. In determining the source of our ordinary shares to close out the covered short position, the underwriters will consider, among other things, the price of our ordinary shares available for purchase in the open market as compared to the price at which they may purchase our ordinary shares through the option granted to them. Naked short sales are sales in excess of such option. The underwriters must close out any naked short position by purchasing our ordinary shares in the open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of our ordinary shares in the open market after pricing that could adversely affect investors who purchase in the offering. Stabilizing transactions consist of various bids for or purchases of our ordinary shares made by the underwriters in the open market prior to the completion of the offering.
The underwriters may also impose a penalty bid. This occurs when a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of the underwriting discount received by it because the representatives have repurchased shares sold by or for the account of such underwriter in stabilizing or short covering transactions.
Similar to other purchase transactions, the underwriters purchases to cover the syndicate short sales may have the effect of raising or maintaining the market price of our ordinary shares or preventing or retarding a decline in the market price of our ordinary shares. As a result, the price of our ordinary shares may be higher than the price that might otherwise exist in the open market. The underwriters may conduct these transactions on the New York Stock Exchange, in the over-the-counter market or otherwise.
Neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation or prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of our ordinary shares. In addition, neither we nor any of the underwriters make any representation that the representatives will engage in these transactions or that these transactions, once commenced, will not be discontinued without notice.
Electronic Distribution
In connection with the offering, certain of the underwriters or securities dealers may distribute prospectuses by electronic means, such as e-mail.
Other Relationships
The underwriters and their respective affiliates are full service financial institutions engaged in various activities, which may include sales and trading, commercial and investment banking, advisory, investment management, investment research, principal investment, hedging, market making, brokerage and other financial and non-financial activities and services. Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates have provided, and may in the future provide, a variety of these services to us and to persons and entities with relationships with us, for which they received or will receive customary fees and expenses. In the ordinary course of their various business activities, the underwriters and their respective affiliates, officers, directors and employees may purchase, sell or hold a broad array of investments and actively trade securities, derivatives, loans, commodities, currencies, credit default swaps and other financial instruments for their own account and for the accounts of their customers, and such investment and trading activities may involve or relate to our assets, securities and/or instruments (directly, as collateral securing other obligations or otherwise) and/or persons and entities with relationships with us. The underwriters and their respective affiliates may also communicate independent investment recommendations, market color or trading ideas and/or publish or express independent research views in respect of such assets, securities or instruments and may at any time hold, or recommend to clients that they
250
should acquire, long and/or short positions in such assets, securities and instruments. In addition, (i) Credit Suisse has provided lending services to one of our affiliates and other financial services in connection with a financing to one of our affiliates and (ii) an affiliate of Credicorp Capital Sociedad Agente de Bolsa S.A. has provided lending and other financial services to two of our subsidiaries.
Selling Restrictions
Our ordinary shares offered by this prospectus may not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, nor may this prospectus or any other offering material or advertisements in connection with the offer and sale of any such securities be distributed or published in any jurisdiction, except under circumstances that will result in compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of that jurisdiction. Persons into whose possession this prospectus comes are advised to inform themselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to the offering and the distribution of this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of our ordinary shares offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or a solicitation is unlawful.
Notice to Prospective Investors in the European Economic Area
In relation to each member state of the European Economic Area, or Member State, no offer of our ordinary shares which are the subject of the offering has been, or will be made to the public in that Member State, other than under the following exemptions under the Prospectus Directive (as defined below):
(a) to any legal entity which is a qualified investor as defined in the Prospectus Directive;
(b) to fewer than 150 natural or legal persons (other than qualified investors as defined in the Prospectus Directive), subject to obtaining the prior consent of the representatives for any such offer; or
(c) in any other circumstances falling within Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive,
provided that no such offer of our ordinary shares referred to in (a) to (c) above shall result in a requirement for the Company or any underwriter to publish a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive, or supplement a prospectus pursuant to Article 16 of the Prospectus Directive.
Each person located in a Member State to whom any offer of our ordinary shares is made or who receives any communication in respect of an offer of our ordinary shares, or who initially acquires any of our ordinary shares will be deemed to have represented, warranted, acknowledged and agreed to and with each underwriter and the Company that (1) it is a qualified investor within the meaning of the law in that Member State implementing Article 2(1)(e) of the Prospectus Directive; and (2) in the case of any of our ordinary shares acquired by it as a financial intermediary as that term is used in Article 3(2) of the Prospectus Directive, our ordinary shares acquired by it in the offer have not been acquired on behalf of, nor have they been acquired with a view to their offer or resale to, persons in any Member State other than qualified investors, as that term is defined in the Prospectus Directive, or in circumstances in which the prior consent of the representatives has been given to the offer or resale; or where our ordinary shares have been acquired by it on behalf of persons in any Member State other than qualified investors, the offer of those ordinary shares to it is not treated under the Prospectus Directive as having been made to such persons.
The Company, the underwriters and their respective affiliates will rely upon the truth and accuracy of the foregoing representations, acknowledgments and agreements.
This prospectus has been prepared on the basis that any offer of our ordinary shares in any Member State will be made pursuant to an exemption under the Prospectus Directive from the requirement to publish a prospectus for offers of our ordinary shares. Accordingly any person making or intending to make an offer in that Member State of our ordinary shares which are the subject of the offering contemplated in this prospectus may
251
only do so in circumstances in which no obligation arises for the Company or any of the underwriters to publish a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the Prospectus Directive in relation to such offer. Neither the Company nor the underwriters have authorized, nor do they authorize, the making of any offer of our ordinary shares in circumstances in which an obligation arises for the Company or the underwriters to publish a prospectus for such offer.
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an offer of our ordinary shares to the public in relation to any of our ordinary shares in any Member State means the communication in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the terms of the offer and our ordinary shares to be offered so as to enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe for our ordinary shares, as the same may be varied in that Member State by any measure implementing the Prospectus Directive in that Member State, the expression Prospectus Directive means Directive 2003/71/EC (as amended) and includes any relevant implementing measure in each Member State.
Notice to Prospective Investors in the United Kingdom
In addition, in the United Kingdom, this document is being distributed only to, and is directed only at, and any offer subsequently made may only be directed at persons who are qualified investors (as defined in the Prospectus Directive) (i) who have professional experience in matters relating to investments falling within Article 19 (5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005, as amended, or the Order and/or (ii) who are high net worth companies (or persons to whom it may otherwise be lawfully communicated) falling within Article 49(2)(a) to (d) of the Order (all such persons together being referred to as relevant persons). This document must not be acted on or relied on in the United Kingdom by persons who are not relevant persons. In the United Kingdom, any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only available to, and will be engaged in with, relevant persons.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Switzerland
Our ordinary shares may not be publicly offered in Switzerland and will not be listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange, or SIX, or on any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. This document has been prepared without regard to the disclosure standards for issuance prospectuses under art. 652a or art. 1156 of the Swiss Code of Obligations or the disclosure standards for listing prospectuses under art. 27 ff. of the SIX Listing Rules or the listing rules of any other stock exchange or regulated trading facility in Switzerland. Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to our ordinary shares or the offering may be publicly distributed or otherwise made publicly available in Switzerland.
Neither this document nor any other offering or marketing material relating to the offering, the Company, our ordinary shares have been or will be filed with or approved by any Swiss regulatory authority. In particular, this document will not be filed with, and the offer of our ordinary shares will not be supervised by, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA, or FINMA, and the offer of our ordinary shares has not been and will not be authorized under the Swiss Federal Act on Collective Investment Schemes, or CISA. The investor protection afforded to acquirers of interests in collective investment schemes under the CISA does not extend to acquirers of our ordinary shares.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Australia
No placement document, prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document has been lodged with the Australian Securities and Investments Commission in relation to the offering. This prospectus does not constitute a prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document under the Corporations Act 2001, or the Corporations Act, and does not purport to include the information required for a prospectus, product disclosure statement or other disclosure document under the Corporations Act.
252
Any offer in Australia of our ordinary shares may only be made to persons, or the Exempt Investors, who are sophisticated investors (within the meaning of section 708(8) of the Corporations Act), professional investors (within the meaning of section 708(11) of the Corporations Act) or otherwise pursuant to one or more exemptions contained in section 708 of the Corporations Act so that it is lawful to offer our ordinary shares without disclosure to investors under Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act.
Our ordinary shares applied for by Exempt Investors in Australia must not be offered for sale in Australia in the period of 12 months after the date of allotment under the offering, except in circumstances where disclosure to investors under Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act would not be required pursuant to an exemption under section 708 of the Corporations Act or otherwise or where the offer is pursuant to a disclosure document which complies with Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act. Any person acquiring our ordinary shares must observe such Australian on-sale restrictions.
This prospectus contains general information only and does not take account of the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. It does not contain any securities recommendations or financial product advice. Before making an investment decision, investors need to consider whether the information in this prospectus is appropriate to their needs, objectives and circumstances, and, if necessary, seek expert advice on those matters.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Hong Kong
Our ordinary shares have not been offered or sold and will not be offered or sold in Hong Kong, by means of any document, other than (a) to professional investors as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571) of Hong Kong and any rules made under that Ordinance; or (b) in other circumstances which do not result in the document being a prospectus as defined in the Companies Ordinance (Cap. 32) of Hong Kong or which do not constitute an offer to the public within the meaning of that Ordinance. No advertisement, invitation or document relating to our ordinary shares has been or may be issued or has been or may be in the possession of any person for the purposes of issue, whether in Hong Kong or elsewhere, which is directed at, or the contents of which are likely to be accessed or read by, the public of Hong Kong (except if permitted to do so under the securities laws of Hong Kong) other than with respect to our ordinary shares which are or are intended to be disposed of only to persons outside Hong Kong or only to professional investors as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance and any rules made under that Ordinance.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Japan
Our ordinary shares have not been and will not be registered under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law of Japan (Law No. 25 of 1948, as amended) and, accordingly, will not be offered or sold, directly or indirectly, in Japan, or for the benefit of any Japanese Person or to others for re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, in Japan or to any Japanese Person, except in compliance with all applicable laws, regulations and ministerial guidelines promulgated by relevant Japanese governmental or regulatory authorities in effect at the relevant time. For the purposes of this paragraph, Japanese Person shall mean any person resident in Japan, including any corporation or other entity organized under the laws of Japan.
Notice to Prospective Investors in the Peoples Republic of China
This offering has not been approved or registered in the Peoples Republic of China, or the PRC. This prospectus may not be circulated or distributed in the PRC and our ordinary shares may not be offered or sold, and will not be offered or sold to any person for the re-offering or resale, directly or indirectly, to any person in the PRC, except to the extent consistent with applicable laws and regulations of the PRC. For the purpose of this paragraph, the PRC does not include Taiwan and the special administrative regions of Hong Kong and Macau.
253
Notice to Prospective Investors in Singapore
This prospectus has not been will not be lodged or registered as a prospectus by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Accordingly, this prospectus and any other document or material in connection with the offer or sale, or invitation for subscription or purchase, of our ordinary shares may not be issued, circulated or distributed, nor may our ordinary shares be offered or sold, or be made the subject of an invitation for subscription or purchase, whether directly or indirectly, to persons in Singapore other than (i) to an institutional investor under Section 274 of the SFA, (ii) to a relevant person pursuant to Section 275(1), or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A), and in accordance with the conditions specified in Section 275, of the SFA, or (iii) otherwise pursuant to, and in accordance with the conditions of, any other applicable provision of the SFA.
Where our ordinary shares are initially subscribed for or purchased pursuant to an offer made in reliance of our exemptions under Section 274 or 275 of the SFA, within the period of six months from the date of the initial subscription or purchase, these ordinary shares should only be sold in Singapore to institutional investors (as defined in Section 4A(1)(c) of the SFA), relevant persons (as defined in Section 275(2) of the SFA) or any person pursuant to Section 275(1A) of the SFA.
Where the ordinary shares are subscribed for or purchased under Section 275 of the SFA by a relevant person which is:
(a) | a corporation (which is not an accredited investor (as defined in Section 4A of the SFA)) the sole business of which is to hold investments and the entire share capital of which is owned by one or more individuals, each of whom is an accredited investor; or |
(b) | a trust (where the trustee is not an accredited investor) whose sole purpose is to hold investments and each beneficiary of the trust is an individual who is an accredited investor, |
securities (as defined in Section 239(1) of the SFA) of that corporation or the beneficiaries rights and interest (howsoever described) in that trust shall not be transferred within six months after that corporation or that trust has acquired our ordinary shares pursuant to an offer made under Section 275 of the SFA except:
(a) | to an institutional investor(as defined in Section 4A(1)(c) of the SFA) or to a relevant person ( as defined in Section 275(2) of the SFA), or to any person pursuant to an offer that is made on terms that such securities of that corporation or such rights or interest in that trust are acquired at a consideration of not less than S$200,000 (or its equivalent in a foreign currency) for each transaction, whether such amount is to be paid for in cash or by exchange of securities or other assets, and further, for corporations, in accordance with the conditions, specified in Section 275 of the SFA; |
(b) | where no consideration is or will be given for the transfer; or |
(c) | where the transfer is by operation of law. |
Notice to Prospective Investors in Argentina
This prospectus has not been registered with the Comisión Nacional de Valores and may not be offered publicly in Argentina. The prospectus may not be publicly distributed in Argentina. Neither we nor the underwriters will solicit the public in Argentina in connection with this prospectus.
254
Notice to Prospective Investors in Brazil
The offer of our ordinary shares described in this prospectus will not be carried out by any means that would constitute a public offering in Brazil under Law No. 6,385, of December 7, 1976, as amended, and under CVM Rule No. 400, of December 29, 2003, as amended. The offer and sale of our ordinary shares have not been and will not be registered with the Brazilian Securities Commission ( Comissão de Valores Mobiliários ). Our ordinary shares have not been offered or sold, and will not be offered or sold in Brazil, except in circumstances that do not constitute a public offering or distribution under Brazilian laws and regulations.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Canada
The ordinary shares may be sold only to purchasers purchasing, or deemed to be purchasing, as principal that are accredited investors, as defined in National Instrument 45-106 Prospectus Exemptions or subsection 73.3(1) of the Securities Act (Ontario), and are permitted clients, as defined in National Instrument 31-103 Registration Requirements, Exemptions and Ongoing Registrant Obligations . Any resale of the ordinary shares must be made in accordance with an exemption from, or in a transaction not subject to, the prospectus requirements of applicable securities laws.
Securities legislation in certain provinces or territories of Canada may provide a purchaser with remedies for rescission or damages if this prospectus (including any amendment thereto) contains a misrepresentation, provided that the remedies for rescission or damages are exercised by the purchaser within the time limit prescribed by the securities legislation of the purchasers province or territory. The purchaser should refer to any applicable provisions of the securities legislation of the purchasers province or territory for particulars of these rights or consult with a legal advisor.
Pursuant to section 3A.3 (or, in the case of securities issued or guaranteed by the government of a non-Canadian jurisdiction, section 3A.4) of National Instrument 33-105 Underwriting Conflicts (NI 33-105), the underwriters are not required to comply with the disclosure requirements of NI 33-105 regarding underwriter conflicts of interest in connection with this offering.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Chile
The offer of our ordinary shares described herein is governed by the General Rule ( Norma de Carácter General ) 336 of June 27, 2012, issued by the Chilean Superintendency of Securities and Insurance, or the SVS. The offer relates to our ordinary shares not registered with the Securities Registry or the Registry of Foreign Securities of the SVS, so our ordinary shares are not subject to the oversight of the SVS. Since our ordinary shares are unregistered securities in Chile, we have no obligation to deliver in Chile public information regarding our ordinary shares. Our ordinary shares may not be sold in a public offering in Chile unless they are registered in the Securities Registry or the Registry of Foreign Securities of the SVS.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Colombia
Our ordinary shares have not been and will not be offered in Colombia through a public offering of securities pursuant to Colombian laws and regulations, nor will they be registered in the Colombian National Registry of Securities and Issuers or listed on a regulated securities trading system such as the Colombian Stock Exchange.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Mexico
Our ordinary shares described in this prospectus are not being offered, sold or traded in Mexico pursuant to, and do not constitute, a public offering ( oferta pública ) in accordance with the Mexican Securities Market Law ( Ley del Mercado de Valores ), as amended, or LMV, or the general rules, regulations and other general
255
provisions, the General Issuers Rules, issued by the Mexican Banking and Securities Commission ( Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores ) , or CNBV, nor is the offering contemplated hereby being authorized by the CNBV; therefore, any such ordinary shares may not be offered or sold publicly, or otherwise be the subject of brokerage activities, in Mexico, except pursuant to a private placement exemption or other exemptions set forth in the LMV. As such, this offering can be made to any person in Mexico so long as the offering is conducted on a direct and personal basis and it complies, among other requirements as set forth under the LMV and the General Issuers Rules, with the following:
(a) | it is made to persons who are institutional investors ( inversionistas institucionales ) within the meaning of Article 2, Roman numeral XVII, of the LMV and regarded as such pursuant to the laws of Mexico, or qualified investors ( inversionistas calificados ) within the meaning of Article 2, Roman numeral XVI, of the LMV, and have the income, assets or qualitative characteristics provided for under Article 1, Roman numeral XIII of the General Issuers Rules, which require maintenance, in average over the past year, of investments in securities (within the meaning of the LMV) for an amount equal or greater than 1,500,000 Investment Units ( Unidades de Inversión ), or UDIs, or in each of the last two years had a gross annual income equal to or greater than 500,000 UDIs; or |
(b) | it is made to persons who are shareholders of companies which fulfill their corporate purpose exclusively or substantially with such securities ( e.g. , investment companies authorized to invest in such securities); or |
(c) | it is made pursuant to a plan or applicable program for our or our affiliates employees or groups of employees; or |
(d) | it is made to less than 100 persons, to the extent such persons do not qualify under (a), (b) or (c) above. |
In identifying proposed purchasers for our ordinary shares in Mexico, the underwriters will only contact persons or entities whom they reasonably believe are within one of the four categories described in the immediately preceding paragraph in items (a) through (d). The underwriters may further require you to expressly reiterate that you fall into one of the above mentioned categories, that you further understand that the private offering of our ordinary shares has less documentary and information requirements than public offerings do, and to waive the right to claim on any lacking thereof.
This prospectus may not be publicly distributed in Mexico, whether through mass media to indeterminate subjects or otherwise, and it is not intended to serve as an application for the registration of our ordinary shares before the CNBV or listing of our ordinary shares before the Mexican Stock Exchange ( Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V.) , or the BMV, nor as a prospectus in connection with a public offering in Mexico. This prospectus is solely our responsibility and has not been reviewed or authorized by the CNBV. The CNBV has not assessed or passed on the investment quality of our ordinary shares, our solvency, liquidity or credit quality or the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this prospectus. In making an investment decision, all investors, including any Mexican investors who may acquire our ordinary shares from time to time, must rely on their own review and examination of the Company. The acquisition of our ordinary shares by an investor who is a resident of Mexico will be made under its own responsibility.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Panama
Our ordinary shares have not been, and will not be, registered for public offering in Panama with the Panamanian Superintendency of the Securities Market ( Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores , previously the National Securities Commission of Panama) under Decree-Law 1 of July 8, 1999, as reformed by Law 67 of 2011, or the Panamanian Securities Act. Accordingly, our ordinary shares may not be offered or sold in Panama or to persons domiciled in Panama, except in certain limited transactions exempted from the registration requirements of the Panamanian Securities Act. Our ordinary shares do not benefit from tax incentives accorded
256
by the Panamanian Securities Act, and are not subject to regulation or supervision by the Panamanian Superintendency of the Securities Market as long as our ordinary shares are privately offered to no more than 25 persons domiciled in Panama and result in the sale to no more than 10 of such persons.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Peru
Our ordinary shares may not be offered or sold in Peru except in compliance with the requirements under applicable securities laws. The information contained in this prospectus has not been and will not be registered with or approved by the Peruvian Superintendency of Capital Markets ( Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores ) or the Lima Stock Exchange ( Bolsa de Valores de Lima ). Accordingly, our ordinary shares may not be offered or sold in Peru, except if such offering is considered a private offering under the applicable securities laws and regulations of Peru. Investors in Peru, as defined by Peruvian legislation, must rely on their own examination of the terms of this offering to determine their ability to invest in our ordinary shares.
Notice to Prospective Investors in the Dubai International Financial Centre
This prospectus relates to an Exempt Offer in accordance with the Offered Securities Rules of the Dubai Financial Services Authority, or the DFSA. This prospectus is intended for distribution only to persons of a type specified in the Offered Securities Rules of the DFSA. It must not be delivered to, or relied on by, any other person. The DFSA has no responsibility for reviewing or verifying any documents in connection with Exempt Offers. The DFSA has not approved this prospectus nor taken steps to verify the information set forth herein and has no responsibility for the prospectus. Our ordinary shares to which this prospectus relates may be illiquid and/or subject to restrictions on their resale. Prospective purchasers of our ordinary shares offered should conduct their own due diligence on our ordinary shares. If you do not understand the contents of this prospectus you should consult an authorized financial advisor.
Notice to Prospective Investors in Israel
This document does not constitute a prospectus under the Israeli Securities Law, 5728-1968, and has not been filed with or approved by the Israel Securities Authority. In Israel, this prospectus is being distributed only to, and is directed only at, investors listed in the first addendum, or the Addendum, to the Israeli Securities Law, consisting primarily of joint investment in trust funds, provident funds, insurance companies, banks, portfolio managers, investment advisors, members of the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, underwriters purchasing for their own account, venture capital funds, entities with equity in excess of NIS 50 million and qualified individuals, each as defined in the Addendum (as it may be amended from time to time), collectively referred to as qualified investors. Qualified investors may be required to submit written confirmation that they fall within the scope of the Addendum.
257
We estimate the expenses in connection with the issuance and distribution of our ordinary shares in this offering, other than underwriting discounts and commissions, as follows:
SEC registration fee |
$ | |||
NYSE listing fee |
||||
Printing expenses |
||||
Legal fees and expenses |
||||
Accountants fees and expenses |
||||
FINRA filing fee |
||||
Miscellaneous costs |
||||
Total |
$ | |||
|
|
We anticipate that the total underwriting discounts and commissions on ordinary shares sold by us will be approximately $ , or % of the gross proceeds of the offering. We will be responsible for the underwriting discounts and commissions related to this offering and for the expenses of the offering listed above.
All amounts in the table are estimates except the SEC registration fee, the NYSE listing fee and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., or FINRA, filing fee.
Certain legal matters in connection with this offering relating to U.S. law will be passed upon for us by Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP, London, United Kingdom. The validity of our ordinary shares offered by this prospectus and other legal matters concerning this offering relating to Singapore law will be passed upon for us by Wong Partnership LLP, Singapore. Certain legal matters concerning this offering will be passed upon for the underwriters by Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC, Singapore, with respect to Singapore law, and White & Case LLP, Miami, Florida, with respect to U.S. law.
The consolidated financial statements of I.C. Power Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014 have been included herein in reliance upon the report of Somekh Chaikin, independent registered public accounting firm, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Generandes Perú S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, have been included herein in reliance upon the report of Caipo y Asociados S. Civil de R.L., independent auditors, appearing elsewhere herein, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
258
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form F-1 (including amendments and relevant exhibits and schedules) under the Securities Act covering the ordinary shares to be sold in this offering. This prospectus, which is part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. For further information, we refer you to the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules filed as part of the registration statement. If a document has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, we refer you to the copy of the document that has been filed. Each summary or outline in this prospectus of a document filed as an exhibit to the registration statement incorporating by reference particular items, sections or paragraphs of such exhibit is qualified in its entirety by the full contents of such exhibit.
We will make available free of charge on or through our Internet website, http://www.icpower-group.com , all of our annual and interim reports and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is filed electronically with, or furnished to, the SEC. Copies of our investor information will also be available on our website and we will provide electronic or paper copies of these documents free of charge upon request. The SEC also maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov that will contain reports and other information that we file electronically with the SEC.
We are not currently subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Immediately upon completion of this offering, we will become subject to periodic reporting and other informational requirements of the Exchange Act as applicable to foreign private issuers. As a foreign private issuer, we will be exempt from the rules under the Exchange Act relating to the furnishing and content of proxy statements and information statements, and our officers, directors and principal shareholders will be exempt from the reporting and short-swing profit recovery provisions contained in Section 16 of the Exchange Act. In addition, we will not be required under the Exchange Act to file periodic reports and financial statements with the SEC as frequently or as promptly as United States companies whose securities are registered under the Exchange Act. However, we will be required to file with the SEC, within four months after the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and each subsequent fiscal year, an annual report on Form 20-F containing consolidated financial statements which will be examined and reported on, with an opinion expressed, by an independent registered public accounting firm. You can inspect and copy the registration statements, reports and other information filed with the SEC at the public reference facility maintained by the SEC at 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. You can request copies of these documents upon payment of a duplicating fee by writing to the SEC. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the public reference facility. Our SEC filings will also be available to the public on the SECs internet website at http://www.sec.gov .
259
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
I.C. Power Ltd. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
F-1
IC Power Ltd.
Condensed Consolidated Interim
Financial Statements
As at June 30, 2015
(Unaudited)
In thousands of U.S. Dollars
IC POWER LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Financial Position (Unaudited) as at
June 30
|
December 31
|
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
436,278 | 583,296 | ||||||
Short-term deposits and restricted cash |
184,975 | 207,646 | ||||||
Trade receivables |
173,809 | 181,358 | ||||||
Other receivables and debit balances |
91,024 | 58,106 | ||||||
Income tax receivable |
4,423 | 3,332 | ||||||
Inventories |
56,784 | 55,335 | ||||||
Assets of disposal group classified as held for sale |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
947,293 | 1,089,073 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||
Restricted cash |
28,351 | 28,351 | ||||||
Investments in associated companies |
8,916 | 9,625 | ||||||
Deposits and other debit balances, including derivative instruments |
46,947 | 28,233 | ||||||
Income tax receivable |
8,415 | 6,779 | ||||||
Deferred taxes, net |
38,679 | 42,609 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
2,842,085 | 2,515,099 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
142,778 | 138,734 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total non-current assets |
3,116,171 | 2,769,430 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
4,063,464 | 3,858,503 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Credit from banks and others |
157,990 | 161,486 | ||||||
Trade payables |
146,878 | 143,639 | ||||||
Other payables and credit balances, including derivative instruments |
106,238 | 112,680 | ||||||
Provisions |
38,432 | 27,187 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
4,535 | 6,766 | ||||||
Liabilities of disposal group classified as held for sale |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
454,073 | 451,758 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||
Loans from banks and others |
1,675,780 | 1,499,504 | ||||||
Debentures |
679,805 | 686,942 | ||||||
Derivative instruments |
18,738 | 21,045 | ||||||
Deferred taxes, net |
151,077 | 144,719 | ||||||
Other long term liabilities |
22,121 | 23,982 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total non-current liabilities |
2,547,521 | 2,376,192 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
3,001,594 | 2,827,950 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Equity |
||||||||
Share capital and premium |
430,572 | 430,572 | ||||||
Capital reserves |
(12,118 | ) | (18,051 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings |
433,110 | 402,708 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total equity attributable to the equity holders of the Company |
851,564 | 815,229 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Non-controlling interest |
210,306 | 215,324 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total equity |
1,061,870 | 1,030,553 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and equity |
4,063,464 | 3,858,503 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
* | Restated and ReclassifiedSee Note 3 |
The notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part thereof.
F-3
IC POWER LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Income (Unaudited)
For the six month
|
For the year
December 31
|
|||||||||||
June 30 2015 |
June 30 *2014 |
|||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||
Sales |
655,022 | 661,376 | 1,372,230 | |||||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
(458,481 | ) | (468,350 | ) | (936,722 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(54,121 | ) | (48,178 | ) | (100,996 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Gross profit |
142,420 | 144,848 | 334,512 | |||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(31,220 | ) | (30,040 | ) | (68,673 | ) | ||||||
Asset write-off |
| | (34,673 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| 47,767 | 68,210 | |||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
| 2,674 | 2,674 | |||||||||
Other expenses |
(849 | ) | (959 | ) | (10,806 | ) | ||||||
Other income |
2,573 | 4,037 | 16,883 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Operating income |
112,924 | 168,327 | 308,127 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financing expenses |
57,254 | 55,647 | 112,897 | |||||||||
Finance expenses on IC capital notes settlement |
| 12,602 | 12,602 | |||||||||
Financing income |
(4,315 | ) | (1,672 | ) | (6,137 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financing expenses, net |
52,939 | 66,577 | 119,362 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Share in income of companies, net of tax |
116 | 1,509 | 2,000 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
60,101 | 103,259 | 190,765 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Taxes on income |
(21,059 | ) | (30,540 | ) | (50,322 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
39,042 | 72,719 | 140,443 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
3,850 | 6,630 | 128,055 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income for the period |
42,892 | 79,349 | 268,498 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||
Equity holders of the company |
32,517 | 66,396 | 236,281 | |||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
10,375 | 12,953 | 32,217 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income for the period |
42,892 | 79,349 | 268,498 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Restated and ReclassifiedSee Note 3 |
The notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part thereof.
F-4
IC POWER LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
For the six month
|
For the year
December 31 2014 |
|||||||||||
June 30 |
June 30 |
|||||||||||
2015 |
2014 |
|||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Income for the period |
42,892 | 79,349 | 268,498 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Components of other comprehensive income that will be reclassified to profit and loss in the future |
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences in respect of foreign operations |
2,339 | 5,394 | (9,771 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences for foreign operations recognized in profit and loss |
| | (24,891 | ) | ||||||||
Groups share in comprehensive income (loss) from investment in associated companies |
| (17 | ) | (17 | ) | |||||||
portion of changes in Cash flow hedgeseffective fair value |
5,094 | (5,007 | ) | (8,820 | ) | |||||||
Cash flow hedgesreclassified to profit or loss of the period |
1,759 | | | |||||||||
Tax benefit (taxes on income) on other comprehensive income |
(1,630 | ) | 1,472 | 2,303 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the period, net of tax |
7,562 | 1,842 | (41,196 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the period |
50,454 | 81,191 | 227,302 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||
Equity holders of the company |
38,450 | 68,770 | 199,182 | |||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
12,004 | 12,421 | 28,120 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the period |
50,454 | 81,191 | 227,302 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Restated and ReclassifiedSee Note 3 |
The notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part thereof.
F-5
IC POWER LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Changes in Equity (Unaudited)
Non- controlling interests |
Total equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attributable to equity holders of the Company |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share
|
Translation
|
Hedging
|
Controlling
|
Retained
|
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at January 1, 2015 |
430,572 | (28,495 | ) | (12,796 | ) | 23,240 | 402,708 | 815,229 | 215,324 | 1,030,553 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries |
| | | | | | (4,254 | ) | (4,254 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of non-controlling interest |
| | | | (1,922 | ) | (1,922 | ) | (18,078 | ) | (20,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
| | | | 32,517 | 32,517 | 10,375 | 42,892 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax |
| 1,853 | 4,080 | | | 5,933 | 1,629 | 7,562 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling Shareholder contribution |
| | | | | | 5,310 | 5,310 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | (193 | ) | (193 | ) | | (193 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at June 30, 2015 |
430,572 | (26,642 | ) | (8,716 | ) | 23,240 | 433,110 | 851,564 | 210,306 | 1,061,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- Controlling interest |
Total equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Attributable to equity holders of the Company |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share
capital
|
Translation
|
Hedging
|
Controlling
|
Retained
|
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the six-month period ended June 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at January 1, 2014 |
430,572 | 3,445 | (7,637 | ) | 23,240 | 203,751 | 653,371 | 145,606 | 798,977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests in respect of a business combination |
| | | | | | 35,800 | 35,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to holders of non-controlling interests in subsidiaries |
| | | | | | (5,600 | ) | (5,600 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to parent company |
| | | | (37,324 | ) | (37,324 | ) | | (37,324 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
| | | | 66,396 | 66,396 | 12,953 | 79,349 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income for the period, net of tax |
| 5,078 | (2,704 | ) | | | 2,374 | (532 | ) | 1,842 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling Shareholder contribution |
| | | | | | 17,248 | 17,248 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at June 30, 2014 |
430,572 | 8,523 | (10,341 | ) | 23,240 | 232,823 | 684,817 | 205,475 | 890,292 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part thereof.
F-6
IC POWER LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Changes in Equity (Unaudited) (contd)
Attributable to equity holders of the Company |
Non- controlling interests |
Total equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share capital and premium |
Translation
reserve from
operations |
Hedging reserve |
Controlling
|
Retained earnings |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at January 1, 2014 (audited) |
430,572 | 3,445 | (7,637 | ) | 23,240 | 203,751 | 653,371 | 145,606 | 798,977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests in respect of business combination |
| | | | | | 35,800 | 35,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries |
| | | | (13,910 | ) | (13,910 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to parent company |
| | | | (37,324 | ) | (37,324 | ) | | (37,324 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling shareholder contribution |
| | | | | | 19,577 | 19,577 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with controlling shareholder |
| | | | | | 131 | 131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for the year |
| | | | 236,281 | 236,281 | 32,217 | 268,498 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss for the year, net of tax |
| (31,940 | ) | (5,159 | ) | | | (37,099 | ) | (4,097 | ) | (41,196 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2014 (audited) |
430,572 | (28,495 | ) | (12,796 | ) | 23,240 | 402,708 | 815,229 | 215,324 | 1,030,553 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part thereof.
F-7
IC POWER LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the six month period ended June 30 |
For the year
2014 |
|||||||||||
2015 |
2014* |
|||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
42,892 | 79,349 | 268,498 | |||||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
58,318 | 50,808 | 108,413 | |||||||||
Asset write-off |
| | 34,673 | |||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
52,939 | 66,577 | 119,362 | |||||||||
Share in loss (income) of associated companies |
(116 | ) | (1,509 | ) | (2,000 | ) | ||||||
Loss on sale of fuel inventories |
| | 1,991 | |||||||||
Bad debt expense |
165 | | 628 | |||||||||
Bonus plans transactions |
(1,389 | ) | 2,743 | 2,541 | ||||||||
Income tax expenses |
21,059 | 30,540 | 50,322 | |||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase (negative goodwill) |
| (47,767 | ) | (68,210 | ) | |||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
| (2,674 | ) | (2,674 | ) | |||||||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
2,221 | 964 | 7,859 | |||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| (7,051 | ) | (114,028 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
176,089 | 171,980 | 407,375 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Change in inventories |
(1,449 | ) | (5,365 | ) | 12,420 | |||||||
Change in trade and other receivables |
(9,728 | ) | (4,425 | ) | 21,132 | |||||||
Change in trade and other payables |
(29,109 | ) | 18,989 | 521 | ||||||||
Change in provisions and employee benefits |
10,101 | 17,801 | (4,046 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
145,904 | 198,980 | 437,402 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income taxes paid |
(19,983 | ) | (34,308 | ) | (56,531 | ) | ||||||
Dividend received |
637 | 598 | 5,877 | |||||||||
Dividend received from discontinued operations |
3,850 | 11,827 | 26,350 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
130,408 | 177,097 | 413,098 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
188 | 73 | 213 | |||||||||
Short-term deposits and restricted cash, net |
23,676 | (59,226 | ) | (221,472 | ) | |||||||
Business combinations |
| (34,772 | ) | (69,986 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition of fixed assets |
(332,876 | ) | (177,708 | ) | (425,880 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition of intangible assets |
(7,287 | ) | (6,250 | ) | (11,483 | ) | ||||||
Value Added Tax, net of project under construction |
(25,010 | ) | 8,579 | (13,160 | ) | |||||||
Interest received |
3,425 | 1,817 | 3,518 | |||||||||
Payment of consideration retained |
(2,800 | ) | | | ||||||||
Cash flow from discontinued operations |
| 47 | 359,938 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(340,684 | ) | (267,440 | ) | (378,312 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Restated and ReclassifiedSee Note 3 |
The notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part thereof.
F-8
IC POWER LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (contd)
For the six month period ended June 30 |
For the year
2014 |
|||||||||||
2015 |
2014* |
|||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Dividend paid to non-controlling interest |
(4,254 | ) | (5,600 | ) | (13,910 | ) | ||||||
Receipt of long-term loans, capital notes and debentures |
186,890 | 286,847 | 666,621 | |||||||||
Repayment of long-term loans and debentures and capital notes |
(51,511 | ) | (321,934 | ) | (374,152 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition of non-controlling interests |
(20,000 | ) | | | ||||||||
Interest paid |
(47,970 | ) | (43,974 | ) | (94,627 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from non-controlling shareholder contribution |
5,310 | 17,248 | 19,577 | |||||||||
Short-term credit from banks and others, net |
(5,614 | ) | 17,772 | 19,927 | ||||||||
Dividends paid to parent company |
| (37,324 | ) | (37,324 | ) | |||||||
Issuance expenses |
| | (9,187 | ) | ||||||||
Payment of consent fee |
| | (1,012 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flow from discontinued operations |
| (2,680 | ) | (128,709 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
62,851 | (89,645 | ) | 47,204 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(147,425 | ) | (179,988 | ) | 81,990 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period |
583,296 | 516,804 | 516,804 | |||||||||
Effect of changes in the exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents |
407 | 1,832 | (15,498 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period |
436,278 | 338,648 | 583,296 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-cash investing transactions: |
||||||||||||
Acquisition of fixed assets under lease contract |
| (107,688 | ) | (107,688 | ) | |||||||
Amortization of transaction costs capitalized |
(36,591 | ) | (7,109 | ) | (34,020 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of fixed assets on credit and others |
(4,899 | ) | (762 | ) | (9,000 | ) |
* | Restated and ReclassifiedSee Note 3 |
The notes to the condensed interim consolidated financial statements are an integral part thereof.
F-9
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 1The Reporting Entity
I.C. Power Ltd. (hereinafterthe Company) is an Israeli-resident company that was incorporated on January 4, 2010 as a private company and its registered address is 23 Aranha St., Tel-Aviv, Israel. The Companys administrative offices are located in Lima, Peru.
As of January 6, 2015, IC Power Ltd. was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Israel Corporation Ltd. (hereinafterIsrael Corp.) On January 7, 2015, Israel Corp. transferred all of IC Powers shares to Kenon Holdings Ltd. (Kenon) as part of its internal reorganization. Kenon is a publicly listed company in the New York Stock Exchange and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.
The Groups condensed financial statements as at June 30, 2015 include those of the Company and its subsidiaries (hereinafterthe Group) and well as the Groups share in associated companies. The Group is engaged, through subsidiaries, in the operation of power generation plants and in the development of energy projects in Peru, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Bolivia, El Salvador, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Guatemala and Israel.
The annual financial statements as at December 31, 2014 were initially authorized for issuance on March 16, 2015 and have been reauthorized for issuance on August 27, 2015 for the purpose of the registration of the shares of IC Power Pte. Ltd. with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, certain amounts have been adjusted and certain disclosures amended as compared with the original financial statements, as indicated, where appropriate.
Note 2Basis of Preparation of the Financial Statements
A. Declaration of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the IASB (IFRS)
The condensed consolidated interim financial statements were prepared in accordance with IAS 34 Financial Reporting for Interim Periods and do not include all of the information required in a complete set of annual financial statements. These statements should be read together with the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 that were reauthorized on August 27, 2015 (hereinafterthe Annual Financial Statements).
The Group has applied the same accounting policies and methods of computation in these condensed consolidated interim financial statements as in its consolidated financial statements as at December 31, 2014.
The condensed consolidated interim financial statements were approved by the Companys Board of Directors on October 29, 2015.
B. Functional currency and presentation currency
The United States dollar is the currency representing the main economic environment in which the Company operates and, accordingly, the dollar constitutes the functional and presentation currency in these financial statements. Currencies other than the dollar constitute foreign currency.
F-10
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 2Basis of Preparation of the Financial Statements (contd)
C. Use of estimates and judgment
In preparation of the condensed financial statements in accordance with IFRS, Company management is required to use judgment when making estimates and assumptions that affect implementation of the policies and the amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. It is clarified that the actual results are likely to be different from these estimates.
Managements judgment, at the time of implementing the Groups accounting policies and the main assumptions used in the estimates involving uncertainty, are consistent with those used in the Annual Financial Statements.
Note 3Restatement and Reclassifications
During the last quarter of 2014 and following the guidelines stated in IFRS 3 Business Combinations, Inkia completed the final version of the fair value measurement related to the acquisition of AEI Nicaragua Holdings, Surpetroil and AEI Jamaica Holdings which occurred on March 12, 2014, March 28, 2014, and May 30, 2014, respectively.
In addition, reclassifications were made in the financial statements regarding: provisions presented in a separate line in the Statement of Financial Position, and depreciation and amortization expenses presented in a separate line in the Statement of Income since this presentation is more appropriate for our companies.
As a result of the changes mentioned above, the comparative figures were restated and reclassified as of June 30, 2014. A summary of adjusted figures are presented below.
Original |
June 30, 2014
Adjustments and
|
Modified |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||
Statement of Income: |
||||||||||||
For the six months period ended June 30, 2014: |
||||||||||||
Sales |
661,343 | 33 | 661,376 | |||||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
(515,737 | ) | 47,387 | (468,350 | ) | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (48,178 | ) | (48,178 | ) | |||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(29,646 | ) | (394 | ) | (30,040 | ) | ||||||
Gain or bargain purchase |
38,818 | 8,949 | 47,767 | |||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
2,662 | 12 | 2,674 | |||||||||
Other expenses |
(1,160 | ) | 201 | (959 | ) | |||||||
Other income |
3,904 | 133 | 4,037 | |||||||||
Financing expenses |
(55,024 | ) | (623 | ) | (55,647 | ) | ||||||
Taxes on income |
(30,007 | ) | (533 | ) | (30,540 | ) | ||||||
Net income for the period |
72,362 | 6,987 | 79,349 |
F-11
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 3Restatement and Reclassifications (contd)
Original |
June 30, 2014
Adjustments and
|
Modified |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||
Statement of Cash flow: |
||||||||||||
For the six months period ended June 30, 2014: |
||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||
Net income for the period |
72,362 | 6,987 | 79,349 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
50,027 | 781 | 50,808 | |||||||||
Finance expenses, net |
65,954 | 623 | 66,577 | |||||||||
Income tax expenses |
30,007 | 533 | 30,540 | |||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase (negative goodwill) |
(38,818 | ) | (8,949 | ) | (47,767 | ) | ||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
(2,662 | ) | (12 | ) | (2,674 | ) | ||||||
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
1,164 | (200 | ) | 964 | ||||||||
Change in inventories |
(5,487 | ) | 122 | (5,365 | ) | |||||||
Change in trade and other receivables |
4,703 | (9,128 | ) | (4,425 | ) | |||||||
Change in trade and other payables |
48,120 | (29,131 | ) | 18,989 | ||||||||
Change in provisions and employee benefits |
(11,285 | ) | 29,086 | 17,801 | ||||||||
Income taxes paid |
(34,097 | ) | (211 | ) | (34,308 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
186,596 | (9,499 | ) | 177,097 | ||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Short-term deposits and restricted cash, net |
(59,261 | ) | 35 | (59,226 | ) | |||||||
Business combinations |
(34,892 | ) | 120 | (34,772 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition of fixed assets |
(171,714 | ) | (5,994 | ) | (177,708 | ) | ||||||
Value added tax, net of project under construction |
| 8,579 | 8,579 | |||||||||
Payments from transaction in derivatives, net |
(8,177 | ) | 8,177 | | ||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(278,357 | ) | 10,917 | (267,440 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Interest paid |
(41,791 | ) | (2,183 | ) | (43,974 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(87,462 | ) | (2,183 | ) | (89,645 | ) |
F-12
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as of March 31, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 4Discontinued Operations
According to that stated in Note 5 of the Annual Financial Statements, the results and cash flows of discontinued operations are as follow:
(a) Results of discontinued operations
For the six month period ended |
For the year ended |
|||||||||||
June 30 2015 |
June 30 2014 |
December 31 2014 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Administrative expenses |
| (421 | ) | (568 | ) | |||||||
Other income |
3,850 | | 14,595 | |||||||||
Financing income |
| 47 | 47 | |||||||||
Finance cost |
| (4,083 | ) | (6,384 | ) | |||||||
Share of profit in associates |
| 11,542 | 11,542 | |||||||||
Income tax |
| (455 | ) | (1,049 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
3,850 | 6,630 | 18,183 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Capital Gain on Acter sale |
| | 132,246 | |||||||||
Recycling of foreign exchange |
| | 24,891 | |||||||||
Income tax on gain on sale of discontinued operation |
| | (47,265 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net gain on sale of discontinued operations |
| | 109,872 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Profit from discontinued operation, net of tax |
3,850 | 6,630 | 128,055 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Cash flows of discontinued operation:
For the six month period ended |
For the year ended |
|||||||||||
June 30 2015 |
June 30 2014 |
December 31 2014 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
3,850 | 11,827 | 26,350 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
| 47 | 359,938 | |||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
| (2,680 | ) | (128,709 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash flow of discontinued operations |
3,850 | 9,194 | 257,579 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 5Non-Controlling Interest Acquisition
On December 31, 2014, Crystal Power Company and Inkia reached a settlement agreement in application of which Inkia bought the shares of Crystal in Nejapa Holdings for a consideration of US$ 20,000 thousand which became effective on January 6, 2015.
As a result of this agreement, Inkia increased its indirect holdings in Nejapa Power LLC from 70.85% to 100%. The difference between the consideration paid and the book value of US$1,922 thousand has been recorded as part of the Companys shareholders equity, in the retained earnings category.
Note 6Cash and Cash Equivalents
As at June 30 2015 |
As at December 31 2014 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Cash |
89 | 105 | ||||||
Balance in banks (a) |
242,897 | 393,526 | ||||||
Time deposits (b) |
193,292 | 189,665 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
436,278 | 583,296 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | Checking accounts are freely available and earn interest at market rates ranging from 0.05% to 5.50% p.a, except for Cerro del Aguila (CDA) and Samay, which can only use their funds for project costs payments. The reduction in the checking accounts is mainly explained by the disbursements incurred in CDA and Samay I. |
(b) | Time deposits are short-term investments made for periods ranging from one day to three months, depending on immediate cash requirements of the Group, and they earn interest at short-term deposit rates in US Dollars and other currencies ranging from 0.06% to 4.3% p.a. |
Note 7Property, Plant and Equipment, net
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Group acquired assets with a cost of approximately US$371,742 thousand, mainly for the construction of projects in Cerro del Aguila and Samay I facilities.
As at June 30
|
As at December 31
|
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Cost |
||||||||
Opening balance |
3,085,841 | 2,313,229 | ||||||
Additions and transfers |
371,742 | 574,780 | ||||||
Translation differences affecting reserves |
14,696 | (62,713 | ) | |||||
Business combinations |
| 272,865 | ||||||
Disposals |
(3,515 | ) | (12,320 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ending balance |
3,468,764 | 3,085,841 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
F-14
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 7Property, Plant and Equipment, net (contd)
As at June 30
|
As at December 31
|
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
||||||||
Opening balance |
570,742 | 438,274 | ||||||
Additions and transfers |
55,785 | 104,534 | ||||||
Translation differences affecting reserves |
1,202 | (3,424 | ) | |||||
Asset write-off |
| 34,673 | ||||||
Disposals |
(1,050 | ) | (3,315 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Ending balance |
626,679 | 570,742 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cost |
2,842,085 | 2,515,099 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Note 8Credit from banks and others
The increase in credit bank and others is principally explained for additional withdrawals related to Samay I and CDA projects:
| On April 24, 2015 Samay I received proceeds in the aggregate amount of US$ 99,000 thousand under its finance credit facility. After this disbursement, Samay I has drawn US$ 252,000 thousand (equivalent to 81% of the total debt approved). |
| On June 9, 2015 CDA received proceeds in the aggregate amount of US$ 85,000 thousand under its finance credit facility. After this disbursement, CDA has drawn US$ 547,000 thousand (equivalent to 93% of the total debt approved). |
Note 9Financial Instruments
Financial instruments measured at fair value for disclosure purposes only
The carrying amounts of certain financial assets and liabilities, including cash and cash equivalents, deposits and restricted cash, trade receivables, other receivables, trade payables, other payables and derivative instruments are the same or proximate to their fair value.
The fair values of the rest of the financial assets and financial liabilities, together with the carrying amounts in the condensed consolidated statements of financial position, are as follows:
As at June 30, 2015 |
As at December 31, 2014 |
|||||||||||||||
Carrying
|
Fair value |
Carrying
|
Fair value |
|||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||
Loans |
1,636,207 | 1,733,603 | 1,450,442 | 1,564,217 | ||||||||||||
Debentures |
698,536 | 810,389 | 703,952 | 819,572 | ||||||||||||
Leases |
178,832 | 196,225 | 193,538 | 212,835 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
2,513,575 | 2,740,217 | 2,347,932 | 2,596,624 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 9Financial Instruments (contd)
Fair value hierarchy
The table below presents recurring fair value measurements for financial instruments and financial liabilities. These fair value measurements are categorized into different levels in the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs to the valuation technique used. The different levels are defined as follow.
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Group can access at the measurement date.
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
As at
|
As at
|
|||||||
Level 2 |
||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||
Financial Assets |
||||||||
Derivatives not used for hedging |
239 | 322 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
239 | 322 | |||||||
Financial Liabilities |
||||||||
Derivatives used for hedging |
28,314 | 33,115 | ||||||
Derivatives not used for hedging |
3,744 | 4,116 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
32,058 | 37,231 |
The Group determines Level 2 fair values for derivatives using discounted cash flow technique, which uses contractual cash flows and a market-related discount rate.
Note 10Segment Information
A. Basis for segmentation
The Company is only involved in the power generation business. There is no other relevant activity or line of business identified. Therefore, senior management team evaluates the business from a geographic perspective. They receive and review the information about the operating results and assets performance as of subsidiary level as well as of country level.
Peru, Israel, Central America and Other are the reportable segments identified for IC Power consolidated financial statements. The geographic regions included in our Other segment are Bolivia, Chile, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Colombia and Panama.
F-16
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 10Segment Information (contd)
B. Information about reportable segments
For management purposes, the Group is organized into business units based on its geographic area, as follows:
Peru |
Israel |
Central
|
All other
|
Adjustments |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
224,941 | 157,567 | 174,669 | 97,845 | | 655,022 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(139,416 | ) | (112,137 | ) | (139,891 | ) | (67,037 | ) | | (458,481 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(24,867 | ) | (11,792 | ) | (10,297 | ) | (11,755 | ) | 4,590 | (54,121 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross profit |
60,658 | 33,638 | 24,481 | 19,053 | 4,590 | 142,420 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(8,198 | ) | (3,016 | ) | (6,451 | ) | (13,626 | ) | 71 | (31,220 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income, net |
78 | 1,000 | 254 | 392 | | 1,724 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating income |
52,538 | 31,622 | 18,284 | 5,819 | 4,661 | 112,924 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(20,016 | ) | (13,206 | ) | (4,886 | ) | (14,831 | ) | | (52,939 | ) | |||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| | | 116 | | 116 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes from continuing operations |
32,522 | 18,416 | 13,398 | (8,896 | ) | 4,661 | 60,101 | |||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(10,702 | ) | (5,017 | ) | (3,014 | ) | (1,537 | ) | (789 | ) | (21,059 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
21,820 | 13,399 | 10,384 | (10,433 | ) | 3,872 | 39,042 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Segment assets |
1,991,069 | 732,635 | 471,500 | 1,080,943 | (221,599 | ) | 4,054,548 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in associated companies |
| | | 8,916 | | 8,916 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment liabilities |
1,418,106 | 623,750 | 280,667 | 848,989 | (169,918 | ) | 3,001,594 |
F-17
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 10Segment Information (contd)
B. Information about reportable segments (contd)
Peru |
Israel |
Central
|
All other
|
Adjustments |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
For the six months ended June 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
225,127 | 201,626 | 135,780 | 98,843 | | 661,376 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(145,227 | ) | (140,891 | ) | (113,170 | ) | (69,062 | ) | | (468,350 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(21,328 | ) | (12,896 | ) | (7,546 | ) | (11,027 | ) | 4,619 | (48,178 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross profit |
58,572 | 47,839 | 15,064 | 18,754 | 4,619 | 144,848 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(8,563 | ) | (4,190 | ) | (3,104 | ) | (14,254 | ) | 71 | (30,040 | ) | |||||||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| | | 47,767 | | 47,767 | ||||||||||||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
| | | 2,674 | | 2,674 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income (loss), net |
2,725 | | 837 | (484 | ) | | 3,078 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating income |
52,734 | 43,649 | 12,797 | 54,457 | 4,690 | 168,327 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(16,568 | ) | (15,482 | ) | (2,751 | ) | (31,776 | ) | | (66,577 | ) | |||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| | | 1,509 | | 1,509 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
36,166 | 28,167 | 10,046 | 24,190 | 4,690 | 103,259 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(11,898 | ) | (7,489 | ) | (1,999 | ) | (8,452 | ) | (702 | ) | (30,540 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
24,268 | 20,678 | 8,047 | 15,738 | 3,988 | 72,719 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Segment assets |
1,375,726 | 732,463 | 332,709 | 1,310,195 | (230,802 | ) | 3,520,291 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in associated companies |
| | | 10,758 | | 10,758 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment liabilities |
848,887 | 680,669 | 186,992 | 1,017,926 | (93,717 | ) | 2,640,757 |
F-18
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 10Segment Information (contd)
B. Information about reportable segments (contd)
Peru |
Israel |
Central
|
All other
|
Adjustments |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
436,673 | 413,578 | 307,618 | 214,361 | | 1,372,230 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(269,528 | ) | (253,077 | ) | (259,573 | ) | (154,544 | ) | | (936,722 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(44,853 | ) | (25,261 | ) | (17,881 | ) | (22,231 | ) | 9,230 | (100,996 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Gross profit |
122,292 | 135,240 | 30,164 | 37,586 | 9,230 | 334,512 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(17,302 | ) | (8,422 | ) | (8,956 | ) | (34,316 | ) | 323 | (68,673 | ) | |||||||||||||
Asset write-off |
| | | (34,673 | ) | | (34,673 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| | | 68,210 | | 68,210 | ||||||||||||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
| | | 2,674 | | 2,674 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
3,224 | | 60 | 3,311 | (518 | ) | 6,077 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating income |
108,214 | 126,818 | 21,268 | 42,792 | 9,035 | 308,127 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(34,574 | ) | (30,571 | ) | (7,881 | ) | (45,751 | ) | (585 | ) | (119,362 | ) | ||||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
| | | 2,000 | | 2,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income (loss) before taxes from continuing operations |
73,640 | 96,247 | 13,387 | (959 | ) | 8,450 | 190,765 | |||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(16,812 | ) | (25,202 | ) | (4,759 | ) | (2,567 | ) | (982 | ) | (50,322 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
56,828 | 71,045 | 8,628 | (3,526 | ) | 7,468 | 140,443 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Segment assets |
1,755,641 | 718,373 | 451,782 | 1,159,793 | (236,711 | ) | 3,848,878 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in associated companies |
| | | 9,625 | | 9,625 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment liabilities |
1,209,031 | 626,482 | 273,979 | 739,821 | (21,363 | ) | 2,827,950 |
Note 11Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
The main contingencies for the Groups subsidiaries and associates are described as follows:
(a) Cerro del Aguila (CDA)
Rio Mantaro Claim
Further to that stated in Note 31 (b) of the Annual Financial Statements, in March 2015, CDA and the CDA EPC contractors amended the CDA EPC to address the claim delivered by the EPC contractors to CDA in April 2014, which demanded a six-month extension for the construction of the CDA Project and an approximately US$92 million increase in the total contract price of the CDA Project. Pursuant
F-19
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 11Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (contd)
(a) Cerro del Aguila (CDA) (contd)
to the amendment, the CDA EPC contractors shall renounce any and all past, existing, or future claims against CDA, based on facts or events that occurred or were known, on or before the date of the amendment, in exchange for CDAs (i) payment of US$40 million, subdivided into 4 payments over the course of the remaining construction period and subject to the achievement of certain milestones, and (ii) grant of the extensions of the CDA Project construction schedule that were previously requested by the CDA EPC contractors, which range between four and six months in length, depending upon the applicable CDA unit.
The amendment to the CDA EPC is subject to the approval of the lenders under the CDA Project Finance Facility. Upon the receipt of such approval, CDA will pay the first of the four US$10 million payments owed to the CDA EPC Contractors under the amendment. The payment of the remaining US$30 million will be contingent upon the CDA EPC contractors satisfaction of certain construction milestones specified in the amendment to the CDA EPC. On May 12, 2015, the banks have approved this amendment. On May 21, CDA made the first US$10 million payment.
CDA is expected to commence commercial operation in the second half of 2016. As a result of the settlement with the CDA EPC contractors, the estimated cost of the CDA Project is not expected to exceed US$950 million, depending upon CDAs final utilization of the US$50 million contingency incorporated within the original US$910 million budgeted for the completion of the CDA Project.
(b) Kallpa Generación S.A.
Import Tax Assessment against Kallpa.
Further to that stated in Note 31 (d) of the Annual Financial Statements, and as a result of Kallpa I tax assessment, Kallpa paid approximately US$ 12.3 million, including interest and fines between March and April 2015. In addition, on April 15, 2015, Kallpa filed an appeal to the Superior Court of Lima.
Note 12Additional Information
(a) OPC
Each year, the Israeli Public Utility Authority Electricity (PUAE) performs an annual update of the various components of the costs recognized in the tariffs, and publishes a new set of tariffs accordingly. In January 2015, the PUAE updated the generation component of the tariff reducing the rates by approximately 10% starting February 2015. The time of use electricity tariff (TAOZ), which is used to determine the rates invoiced to OPCs end users, is mainly comprised of the generation component, which is the basis for indexation of OPCs natural gas price purchases.
(b) IC Power
On May 6, 2015 IC Power announced the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding with Hadera Paper Ltd. regarding the construction of a 120 megawatt cogeneration natural gas power plant. Both companies agreed to execute transaction agreements within 75 days of the date of the Memorandum, and to complete the transaction within 120 days of the signing date.
F-20
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 12Additional Information (contd)
(b) IC Power (contd)
On June 8, 2015 IC Power executed an agreement with Hadera Paper Ltd., pursuant to which IC Power has agreed to acquire from Hadera Paper 100% of the shares in Advanced Integrated Energy Ltd. (Integrated Energy). Integrated Energy holds a conditional license for the construction of a 120MW cogeneration power station and operates Hadera Papers energy center at Hadera Papers site which currently supplies electricity and steam to Hadera Papers facility. Consideration for the transaction is NIS 60 million (approximately US$15.6 million). Additional investments by IC Power will be required to enable Integrated Energy to complete construction of the power plant, which is expected to commence operations in the second half of 2018. Completion of the acquisition is subject to satisfaction of various conditions precedent, including receipt of the required regulatory approvals, and the parties have the right to terminate the agreement if such conditions are not met by the end of 2015.
On August 10, 2015, after fulfilling the conditions precedent contemplated in the aforementioned agreement, IC Power completed the acquisition of Integrated Energy.
Note 13Subsequent Events
(a) OPC
In August 2015, Israels Public Utilities Authority (the PUAE) published a decision that Independent Power Producers (IPPs) in Israel would be obligated to pay system management service charges, which charges are retroactively effective as of June 1, 2013. According to the PUAE decision, as amended in September 2015, the amount of system management service charges that would be payable by OPC from the effective date of June 1, 2013 to June 30, 2015, is approximately NIS 159 million (approximately US$ 41 million), not including interest rate and linkage costs. The approximately NIS 159 million which the PUAE has deemed payable by OPC is based upon the average rate of the system management service charges. However, as the rate of the new system management service charges, like other rates of the PUAE, varies by season (e.g., summer and winter) and by demand period (peak, shoulder and off-peak), the PUAEs final calculation of the amount payable by OPC will be based upon the applicable time of use rates. The company is considering the implications of this decision and may contest it.
In the financial statements as of December 31, 2014 initially authorized for issuance, OPC recorded provisions for system management service charges and diesel surcharges, which were recorded in the statement of financial position in the aggregate amount of US$70 million. In the Companys opinion, due to the PUAE decision, it is more likely than not that OPC will not be charged more than the amount that was indicated in the PUAE decision. Therefore, the Company revised the provisions as of December 31, 2014 such that the total balance of the provision as of December 31, 2014 is US$27 million.
F-21
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements as at June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)
Note 13Subsequent Events (contd)
(a) OPC (contd)
On September 8, 2015, the PUAE published a final decision, which became effective on September 13, 2015, reducing the PUAE generation component tariff by approximately 12% to NIS 265.2 per MWh. OPC uses privately negotiated rates to sell electricity to customers under its PPAs, but such rates are expressed as a discount to the generation component included within the PUAE rate, so a decline in public rates will result in a corresponding decline in OPCs rates and, accordingly, its revenues. OPCs main cost of sales is gas, and prices for the gas it consumes under its supply agreement with the Tamar Group are indexed to the PUAE generation component tariff and NIS/US$ exchange rate; however, this supply agreement also contains a floor price mechanism and, as a result of previous declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, OPC will begin to pay the ultimate floor price set forth in its supply agreement in November 2015. Therefore, the recent September 2015 decline and any further declines in the PUAE generation component tariff, will not result in a corresponding decline in OPCs natural gas expenses, and will lead to a greater decline in OPCs margins.
F-22
IC Power Ltd.
Consolidated Financial
Statements
As at December 31, 2014
In thousands of U.S. Dollars
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of IC Power Ltd
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of IC Power Ltd. and subsidiaries (the Company) as at December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
/s/ Somekh Chaikin
Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
Member Firm of KPMG International
Tel Aviv, Israel
August 27, 2015
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at December 31
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||
Note |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
6 | 583,296 | 516,804 | |||||||||
Short-term deposits and restricted cash |
7 | 207,646 | 9,110 | |||||||||
Trade receivables |
8 | 181,358 | 138,261 | |||||||||
Other receivables and debit balances |
9 | 58,106 | 30,486 | |||||||||
Income tax receivable |
3,332 | 376 | ||||||||||
Inventories |
10 | 55,335 | 28,568 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total current assets |
1,089,073 | 723,605 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||
Restricted cash |
7 | 28,351 | | |||||||||
Investments in associated companies |
11 | 9,625 | 286,385 | |||||||||
Investments in other companies |
| 3,370 | ||||||||||
Deposits and other debit balances, including derivative instruments |
28,233 | 31,138 | ||||||||||
Income tax receivable |
6,779 | | ||||||||||
Deferred taxes, net |
25 | 42,609 | 25,645 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
12 | 2,515,099 | 1,874,955 | |||||||||
Intangible assets |
13 | 138,734 | 90,385 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total non-current assets |
2,769,430 | 2,311,878 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
3,858,503 | 3,035,483 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||
Credit from banks and others |
14 | 161,486 | 243,763 | |||||||||
Trade payables |
16 | 143,639 | *91,551 | |||||||||
Other payables and credit balances, including derivative instruments |
17 | 112,680 | 79,350 | |||||||||
Provisions |
18 | 27,187 | *21,573 | |||||||||
Income taxes payable |
6,766 | 14,578 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total current liabilities |
451,758 | 450,815 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||||||
Loans from banks and others |
14 | 1,499,504 | 788,262 | |||||||||
Loans and capital notes from parent company |
15 | | 242,266 | |||||||||
Debentures |
14 | 686,942 | 637,140 | |||||||||
Derivative instruments |
17 | 21,045 | 9,921 | |||||||||
Deferred taxes, net |
25 | 144,719 | 85,935 | |||||||||
Other long term liabilities |
17 | 23,982 | 22,167 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total non-current liabilities |
2,376,192 | 1,785,691 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,827,950 | 2,236,506 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Equity |
19 | |||||||||||
Share capital and premium |
430,572 | 430,572 | ||||||||||
Capital reserves |
(18,051 | ) | 19,048 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
402,708 | 203,751 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total equity attributable to the equity holders of the Company |
815,229 | 653,371 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
20 | 215,324 | 145,606 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total equity |
1,030,553 | 798,977 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
3,858,503 | 3,035,483 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(*) Reclassifiedsee Note 3(b).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-25
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Year Ended December 31
2014 |
*2013 |
*2012 |
||||||||||||||
Note |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||||||||
Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||
Sales |
1,372,230 | 873,370 | 576,256 | |||||||||||||
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) |
21 | (936,722 | ) | (593,802 | ) | (395,533 | ) | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
12, 13 | (100,996 | ) | (71,627 | ) | (51,426 | ) | |||||||||
Gross Profit |
334,512 | 207,941 | 129,297 | |||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
22 | (68,673 | ) | (41,180 | ) | (36,709 | ) | |||||||||
Asset write-off |
12 | (34,673 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
4 | 68,210 | 1,320 | | ||||||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
4 | 2,674 | | | ||||||||||||
Other expenses |
(10,806 | ) | (708 | ) | (378 | ) | ||||||||||
Other income |
23 | 16,883 | 4,240 | 6,855 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating income |
308,127 | 171,613 | 99,065 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Financing expenses |
24 | 112,897 | 85,694 | 49,348 | ||||||||||||
Finance expenses on IC capital notes settlement |
15, 24 | 12,602 | | | ||||||||||||
Financing income |
24 | (6,137 | ) | (5,543 | ) | (5,092 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
119,362 | 80,151 | 44,256 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
11 | 2,000 | 1,929 | 2,486 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
190,765 | 93,391 | 57,295 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Taxes on income |
25 | (50,322 | ) | (40,693 | ) | (19,953 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
140,443 | 52,698 | 37,342 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Discontinued Operations |
||||||||||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
5 | 128,055 | 28,427 | 29,116 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income for the period |
268,498 | 81,125 | 66,458 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||||||
Owners of the company |
236,281 | 66,415 | 57,013 | |||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
20 | 32,217 | 14,710 | 9,445 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income for the year |
268,498 | 81,125 | 66,458 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share (in USD) |
28 | 23.6 | 6.6 | 5.7 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per shareContinuing operations |
||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share (in USD) |
28 | 10.8 | 3.8 | 2.8 |
(*) | Reclassifiedsee Note 3(b) and Note 5(a). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-26
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the Year Ended December 31
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Net income for the year |
268,498 | 81,125 | 66,458 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Components of other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||
Items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss |
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences in respect of foreign operations |
(9,771 | ) | *2,006 | *404 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences from discontinued operations that will be transferred to profit or loss |
| *(26,268 | ) | *10,460 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences in respect of foreign operations from discontinued operations recognized in profit and loss |
(24,891 | ) | | | ||||||||
Groups share in comprehensive income from investment in Associated companies |
(17 | ) | (104 | ) | 129 | |||||||
Change in fair value of derivatives used to hedge cash flows |
(8,820 | ) | (18,582 | ) | (637 | ) | ||||||
Income tax on other comprehensive income |
2,303 | 5,554 | 92 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax |
(41,196 | ) | (37,394 | ) | 10,448 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total comprehensive income for the year |
227,302 | 43,731 | 76,906 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||||||
Owners of the company |
199,182 | 31,842 | 67,726 | |||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
28,120 | 11,889 | 9,180 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total comprehensive income for the year |
227,302 | 43,731 | 76,906 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) Reclassifiedsee Note 3(b) and Note 5(a).
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-27
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Attributable to equity holders of the Company |
Non-
|
Total equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share
capital
|
Translation
|
Hedging
|
Controlling
|
Retained
|
Total |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at January 1, 2014 |
430,572 | 3,445 | (7,637 | ) | 23,240 | 203,751 | 653,371 | 145,606 | 798,977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests in respect of business combination |
| | | | | | 35,800 | 35,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries |
| | | | | | (13,910 | ) | (13,910 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to parent company |
| | | | (37,324 | ) | (37,324 | ) | | (37,324 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling Shareholder contribution |
| | | | | | 19,577 | 19,577 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions with controlling shareholder |
| | | | | | 131 | 131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | | 236,281 | 236,281 | 32,217 | 268,498 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax |
| (31,940 | ) | (5,159 | ) | | | (37,099 | ) | (4,097 | ) | (41,196 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2014 |
430,572 | (28,495 | ) | (12,796 | ) | 23,240 | 402,708 | 815,229 | 215,324 | 1,030,553 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-28
IC POWER LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Changes in Equity (contd)
Attributable to equity holders of the Company |
Non-
|
Total equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share
capital
|
Translation
|
Hedging
|
Controlling
|
Retained
|
Total |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at January 1, 2013 |
430,572 | 28,211 | 2,170 | 20,965 | 137,336 | 619,254 | 128,835 | 748,089 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries |
| | | | | | (23,266 | ) | (23,266 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling Shareholder contribution |
| | | | | | 27,602 | 27,602 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Controlling shareholder reserve |
| | | 2,275 | | 2,275 | 546 | 2,821 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | | 66,415 | 66,415 | 14,710 | 81,125 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax |
| (24,766 | ) | (9,807 | ) | | | (34,573 | ) | (2,821 | ) | (37,394 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2013 |
430,572 | 3,445 | (7,637 | ) | 23,240 | 203,751 | 653,371 | 145,606 | 798,977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-29
IC POWER LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statement of Changes in Equity (contd)
Attributable to equity holders of the Company |
Non-
|
Total equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share capital and premium |
Translation
|
Hedging
|
Controlling
|
Retained
|
Total |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at January 1, 2012 |
430,572 | 17,298 | 2,370 | 19,613 | 80,323 | 550,176 | 72,071 | 622,247 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends to non-controlling interests in subsidiaries |
| | | | | | (33 | ) | (33 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling Shareholder contribution |
| | | | | | 47,617 | 47,617 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Controlling shareholder reserve |
| | | 1,352 | | 1,352 | | 1,352 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | | 57,013 | 57,013 | 9,445 | 66,458 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax |
| 10,913 | (200 | ) | | | 10,713 | (265 | ) | 10,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2012 |
430,572 | 28,211 | 2,170 | 20,965 | 137,336 | 619,254 | 128,835 | 748,089 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-30
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Year Ended December 31
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||
Net income for the year |
268,498 | 81,125 | 66,458 | |||||||||
Adjustments: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
108,413 | 75,570 | 55,279 | |||||||||
Asset write-off |
34,673 | | | |||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
119,362 | 80,151 | 44,256 | |||||||||
Share in income of associated companies |
(2,000 | ) | (1,929 | ) | (2,486 | ) | ||||||
Loss on sale of fuel inventories |
1,991 | 558 | | |||||||||
Bad debt expense |
628 | | *131 | |||||||||
Share-based payment transactions |
2,541 | 3,763 | 2,978 | |||||||||
Income tax expenses |
50,322 | 40,693 | 19,953 | |||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase (negative goodwill) |
(68,210 | ) | (1,320 | ) | | |||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
(2,674 | ) | | | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
7,859 | (17 | ) | *(980 | ) | |||||||
Net income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
(114,028 | ) | (28,546 | ) | (29,222 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
407,375 | 250,048 | 156,367 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Change in inventories |
12,420 | (2,083 | ) | (5,785 | ) | |||||||
Change in trade and other receivables |
21,132 | *(53,972 | ) | *(16,706 | ) | |||||||
Change in trade and other payables |
521 | *48,204 | *(1,694 | ) | ||||||||
Change in provisions and employee benefits |
(4,046 | ) | *21,767 | (746 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
437,402 | 263,964 | 131,436 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income taxes paid |
(56,531 | ) | (23,685 | ) | (27,000 | ) | ||||||
Dividend received |
5,877 | 5,534 | 1,868 | |||||||||
Dividend received from discontinued operations |
26,350 | 25,890 | 15,153 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
413,098 | 271,703 | 121,457 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
213 | 3,999 | 4,948 | |||||||||
Short term deposits and restricted cash, net |
(221,472 | ) | 74,108 | 92,947 | ||||||||
Business combinations |
(69,986 | ) | (27,850 | ) | | |||||||
Acquisition of fixed assets |
(425,880 | ) | *(293,841 | ) | *(371,360 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition of intangible assets |
(11,483 | ) | (9,123 | ) | (17,396 | ) | ||||||
Value Added Tax, net of project under construction |
(13,160 | ) | *(8,082 | ) | *(7,603 | ) | ||||||
Interest received |
3,518 | 2,931 | 5,662 | |||||||||
Sale of associate, qualified as discontinued operations |
359,938 | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash used in investment activities |
(378,312 | ) | (257,858 | ) | (292,802 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Dividend paid to non-controlling interest |
(13,910 | ) | (23,266 | ) | (15,515 | ) | ||||||
Receipt of long-term loans, Capital notes and Debentures |
666,621 | *323,063 | 205,641 | |||||||||
Repayment of long-term loans, Debentures and Capital notes |
(374,152 | ) | (80,660 | ) | (40,047 | ) | ||||||
Interest paid |
(94,627 | ) | *(59,722 | ) | *(37,045 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from non-controlling Shareholder contribution |
19,577 | 27,602 | 47,617 | |||||||||
Short-term credit from banks and others, net |
19,927 | *138,630 | (28,710 | ) | ||||||||
Dividends paid to parent company |
(37,324 | ) | | | ||||||||
Issuance expenses |
(9,187 | ) | *(5,686 | ) | | |||||||
Payment of consent fee |
(1,012 | ) | | | ||||||||
Effect of discontinued operations |
(128,709 | ) | | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
47,204 | 319,961 | 131,941 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
81,990 | 333,806 | (39,404 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year |
516,804 | 183,671 | 220,803 | |||||||||
Effect of changes in the exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents |
(15,498 | ) | (673 | ) | 2,272 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year |
583,296 | 516,804 | 183,671 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Non-cash investing transactions: |
||||||||||||
Acquisition of fixed assets under lease contract |
(107,688 | ) | | | ||||||||
Amortization of transaction costs capitalized |
(34,020 | ) | (1,105 | ) | | |||||||
Purchase of fixed assets on credit and others |
(9,000 | ) | (17,923 | ) | (2,181 | ) |
(*) | Reclassifiedsee Note 3(b) and Note 5(a). |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
F-31
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 1General
A. The Reporting Entity
I.C. Power Ltd. (hereinafterthe Company) is an Israeli-resident company that was incorporated on January 4, 2010 as a private company and its registered address is 23 Aranha St., Tel-Aviv, Israel. The Companys administrative offices are located in Lima, Peru.
As of January 6, 2015, IC Power Ltd. was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Israel Corporation Ltd. (hereinafterthe Parent Company). On January 7, 2015, Israel Corp. transferred all of IC Power Shares to Kenon Holdings Ltd (Kenon) as part of its internal reorganization: Kenon is a publicly listed company in both the New York Stock Exchange and Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.
The Groups financial statements include those of the Company and its subsidiaries (hereinafterthe Group) as well as the Groups share in associated companies. The Group is engaged, through subsidiaries, in the operation of power generation plants and in the development of energy projects.
The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 were initially authorized for issuance on March 16, 2015, and have been reauthorized for issuance on August 27, 2015 for the purpose of the registration of the shares of IC Power Pte Ltd with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, certain amounts have been adjusted and certain disclosures amended as compared with the original financial statements, as indicated, where appropriate.
The Group, through its operating subsidiaries and associates, provides electricity generation using different technologies such as hydroelectric, natural gas and diesel turbines and heavy fuel oil engines, in Peru, Chile, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Bolivia, El Salvador, Jamaica, Nicaragua, Guatemala, and Israel. As a result of Inkias acquisition of various assets during the course of 2014 and of the sale of its 21% indirect equity interest in Edegel, the Group has a capacity of approximately 2,642 MWs as of December 31, 2014 (3,610 MWs as of December 31, 2013 including Edegel).
Entity |
Country |
Percentage of
|
Energy Used
|
Capacity
|
Month Commenced
|
|||||||||
Operating Companies |
||||||||||||||
Kallpa |
Peru | 75 | % | Natural gas | 870 | July 2007 | ||||||||
COBEE |
Bolivia | 100 | % |
Hydroelectric
and natural gas |
228 | June 2007 | ||||||||
Central Cardones |
Chile | 87 | % | Diesel | 153 | December 2011 | ||||||||
Nejapa |
El Salvador | 71 | % | Heavy fuel oil | 140 | June 2007 | ||||||||
CEPP |
Dominican
Republic |
97 | % | Heavy fuel oil | 67 | June 2007 | ||||||||
JPPC |
Jamaica | 100 | % | Heavy fuel oil | 60 | June 2007May 2014 | ||||||||
Colmito |
Chile | 100 | % |
Natural gas
and diesel |
58 | October 2013 | ||||||||
Corinto |
Nicaragua | 65 | % | Heavy fuel oil | 71 | March 2014 | ||||||||
Tipitapa |
Nicaragua | 65 | % | Heavy fuel oil | 51 | March 2014 | ||||||||
Amayo I |
Nicaragua | 61 | % | Wind | 40 | March 2014 | ||||||||
Amayo II |
Nicaragua | 61 | % | Wind | 23 | March 2014 | ||||||||
Surpetroil |
Colombia | 60 | % | Natural gas | 15 | March 2014 | ||||||||
KallpaLas Flores |
Peru | 75 | % | Natural gas | 193 | April 2014 | ||||||||
PQP |
Guatemala | 100 | % | Heavy fuel oil | 179 | September 2014 | ||||||||
OPC |
Israel | 80 | % |
Diesel and
natural gas |
440 | July 2013 |
F-32
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 1General (contd)
A. The Reporting Entity (contd)
Entity |
Country |
Percentage of
|
Energy Used
|
Capacity
|
Month Commenced
|
|||||||||
Investments |
||||||||||||||
Pedregal |
Panama | 21 | % | Heavy fuel oil | 54 | June 2007 | ||||||||
Total operating capacity as of December 31, 2014 |
2,642 | |||||||||||||
Project Pipeline |
||||||||||||||
CDA |
Peru | 75 | % | Hydroelectric | 510 | |||||||||
Samay I |
Peru | 75 | % |
Diesel and
natural gas |
600 | |||||||||
Kanan |
Panama | 100 | % | Heavy fuel oil | 92 | |||||||||
Total pipeline capacity |
1,202 |
B. Definitions
1. | The Corporation or the Company IC Power Ltd. |
2. | The Group IC Power Ltd. and its subsidiaries. |
3. | Subsidiaries companies whose financial statements are fully consolidated with those of the Corporation, directly or indirectly. |
4. | Associated companies companies or joint ventures, not including subsidiaries and proportionately consolidated companies, where the Company has significant influence over their monetary and operating policies and the Companys investment therein is included based on the equity method of accounting. |
5. | Investee companies subsidiaries, proportionately consolidated companies, and associated companies. |
6. | Related parties within the meaning thereof in International Accounting Standard 24, 2009 regarding Related parties. |
Note 2Significant Accounting Policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of these consolidated financial statements are set out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
(a) Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
F-33
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(a) Basis of preparation (contd)
The consolidated financial statements were authorized for issue by the Board of Directors on August 27, 2015.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the following assets and liabilities: derivative financial instruments; deferred tax assets and liabilities; provisions; assets and liabilities for employee benefits; and investments in associates. For further information regarding the measurement of these assets and liabilities see Note 2 regarding significant accounting policies.
(b) Changes in accounting policies
New standards, amendments and interpretations adopted by the group
The following standards have been adopted by the group for the first time for the financial year beginning on 1 January 2014:
Amendment to IAS 36 Impairment of assets: Recoverable Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets. This amendment includes new disclosure requirements for situations in which impairment is recognized and the recoverable amount is determined on the basis of fair value less costs of disposal and also it removes the requirement to provide disclosure of the recoverable amount of material cash-generating units if no impairment was recognized in their respect. As a result of the amendments to IAS 36, the Group has expanded its disclosures of recoverable amounts, see Note 13.
Other standards, amendments and interpretations which are effective for the financial year beginning on 1 January 2014 are not material to the group.
New standards, amendments and interpretations not yet adopted by the group
A number of new standards and amendments to standards and interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning after 1 January 2015, and have not been applied in preparing these consolidated financial statements. None of these is expected to have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements of the Group, except the following set out below:
IFRS 9 Financial instruments: addresses the classification, measurement and recognition of financial assets and financial liabilities. The complete version of IFRS 9, which was issued in July 2014, retains but simplifies the mixed measurement model and establishes three primary measurement categories for financial assets: amortized cost, fair value through other comprehensive income (OCI) I and fair value through profit and loss. The basis of classification depends on the entitys business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial asset. IFRS 9 relaxes the requirements for hedge effectiveness by replacing the bright line hedge effectiveness tests. It requires an economic relationship between the hedged item and hedging instrument and for the hedged ratio to be the same as the one management actually use for risk management purposes. Contemporaneous documentation is still required but is different to that currently prepared under IAS 39. The standard is effective for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The group is yet to assess IFRS 9s full impact.
F-34
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(b) Changes in accounting policies (contd)
IFRS 15 Revenue from contracts with customers deals with revenue recognition and establishes principles for reporting useful information to users of financial statements about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from an entitys contracts with customers. Revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of a good or service and thus has the ability to direct the use and obtain the benefits from the good or service.
The standard replaces IAS 18 Revenue and IAS 11 Construction contracts and related interpretations. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 and earlier application is permitted. The group is assessing the impact of IFRS 15.
There are no other IFRSs or IFRIC interpretations that are not yet effective that would be expected to have a material impact on the Group.
(c) Basis of consolidation
(i) Business combinations
The Group accounts for business combinations using the acquisition method when control is transferred to the Group. The consideration transferred in the acquisition is generally measured at fair value, as are the identifiable net assets acquired. Any goodwill that arises is tested annually for impairment. Any gain on a bargain purchase gain is recognized in profit or loss immediately. Transaction costs are expensed as incurred, except if related to the issue of debt or equity securities.
The consideration transferred does not include amounts related to the settlement of pre-existing relationships. Such amounts are generally recognized in profit or loss.
Any contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the acquisition date. If an obligation to pay contingent consideration that meets the definition of a financial instrument is classified as equity, then it is not re-measured and settlement is accounted for within equity. Otherwise, subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent consideration are recognized in profit or loss.
(ii) Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The Group controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on which control commences until the date on which control ceases.
The Group has no interests in structured entities as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
(iii) Non-controlling interest (NCI)
NCI are measured at their proportionate share of the acquirees identifiable net assets at the acquisition date.
F-35
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(c) Basis of consolidation (contd)
Changes in the Groups interest in a subsidiary that do not result in a loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions.
(iv) Loss of control
When the Group loses control over a subsidiary, it derecognizes the assets and liabilities of the subsidiary, and any related NCI and other components of equity. Any resulting gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss. Any interest retained in the former subsidiary is measured at fair value when control is lost.
(v) Investment in Associates
Associates are all entities over which the group has significant influence but not control, over the financial and operating policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of between 20% and 50% of the voting rights.
Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method. Under the equity method, the investment is initially recognized at cost, and the carrying amount is increased or decreased to recognize the investors share of the profit or loss of the investee after the date of acquisition. The groups investment in associates includes goodwill identified on acquisition. If the ownership interest in an associate is reduced but significant influence is retained, only a proportionate share of the amounts previously recognized in OCI is reclassified to profit or loss where appropriate.
The Groups share of post-acquisition profit or loss is recognized in the income statement, and its share of post-acquisition movements in OCI is recognized in OCI with a corresponding adjustment to the carrying amount of the investment. When the groups share of losses in an associate equals or exceeds its interest in the associate, including any other unsecured receivables, the group does not recognize further losses, unless it has incurred legal or constructive obligations or made payments on behalf of the associate.
(vi) Transactions eliminated on consolidation
Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealized income and expenses arising from intra-group transactions, are eliminated. Unrealized gains arising from transactions with equity accounted investees are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Groups interest in the investee. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealized gains, but only to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
(d) Consolidation of COBEE financial statements
The Bolivian government under the mandate of Evo Morales has nationalized companies that were privatized during President Gonzalo Sánchez de Lozadas 1993-1997 administration and some other companies that were never owned by the Bolivian government. In addition, Evo Morales announced that the government intends to control the electricity market and it intends to hold an open discussion regarding the conditions under which the process will take place.
F-36
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(d) Consolidation of COBEE financial statements (contd)
As of the date of this report, the Bolivian government has not taken any specific action nor threatened to take any specific action against COBEE. Currently, Inkia has full control of COBEE´s operations and maintains all the associated economic rights and risks. Therefore, COBEE´s financial statements are consolidated in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
(e) Foreign currency translation
(i) Functional currency
Items included in the financial statements of each of the groups entities are measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the functional currency). The consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars, which is the groups functional currency.
(ii) Foreign currency transactions
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of Group entities at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at the reporting date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rate when the fair value was determined. Foreign currency differences are generally recognized in profit and loss. Non-monetary items that are measured based on historical cost in a foreign currency are not translated.
However, foreign currency differences arising from the retranslation of the following items are recognized in OCI:
| Available-for sale equity investments (except on impairment, in which case foreign currency differences that have been recognized in OCI are reclassified to profit or loss); and |
| Qualifying cash flow hedges to the extent the hedges are effective. |
(iii) Foreign operation
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value adjustment arising on acquisition, are translated into U.S. Dollars at the exchange rates at the reporting date. The income and expenses of foreign operations are translated into U.S. Dollars at the exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.
Foreign currency differences are recognized in OCI and accumulated in the translation reserve, except to the extent that the translation difference is allocated to NCI.
When a foreign operation is disposed entirely or partially such control is lost, the cumulative amount in the translation reserve related to that foreign operation is reclassified to profit or loss as part of the gain or loss on disposal. If the Group disposes a part of its interest in a subsidiary but retains control, then the relevant proportion of the cumulative amount is reattributed to NCI. When the Group disposes of only part of an associate while retaining significant influence, the relevant proportion of the cumulative amount is reclassified to profit or loss.
F-37
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(f) Discontinued operation
A discontinued operation is a component of the Groups business, the operations and cash flows of which can be clearly distinguished from the rest of the Group and which:
| Represents a separate major line of business or geographic area of operations |
| Is part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographic area of operations; or |
| Is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to re-sale |
Classification as a discontinued operation occurs at the earlier of disposal or when the operation meets the criteria to be classified as held-for-sale.
When an operation is classified as a discontinued operation, the comparative statement of profit or loss and OCI is re-presented as if the operation had been discontinued from the start of the comparative year.
(g) Revenue
Revenue is recognized to the extent that it is probable that the economic benefits will flow to the Group and the revenue can be reliably measured. Revenue comprises the fair value for the sale of electricity, net of value-added-tax, rebates and discounts and after eliminating sales within the Group.
Revenues from the sale of energy are recognized in the period during which the sale occurs. The revenues from the generation business are recorded based upon output delivered and capacity provided at prices specified pursuant to our Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs), or at marginal costs determined on the spot market, if the sales are made on the spot market.
Our revenues are determined substantially by long-term, U.S. dollar-linked PPAs. PPAs are usually entered into at prices that are equivalent to, or higher than, the prevailing spot market rates, the majority of which are indexed to the underlying fuel cost of the related long-term supply agreements. Under the terms of the majority of our PPAs, the power purchaser is contractually obligated to purchase its energy requirements, and sometimes capacity and/or ancillary services, from the power generator based upon a base price (denominated either in U.S. Dollars or in the local currency) that is generally adjusted for a combination of some of the following: (1) fluctuations in exchange rates, (2) the U.S. inflation index, (3) a local inflation index, (4) fluctuations in the cost of operating fuel, (5) supply costs of natural gas, and (6) transmission costs. Additionally, in Peru, PPAs include provisions that change the contractual unitary energy prices in the case of an interruption of the supply or transportation of natural gas through the use of a methodology based on spot prices existing on the dates in which the interruption event occurred. Many of the prices in our PPAs differentiate between peak and off-peak periods. As of December 31, 2014, the weighted average remaining life of our PPAs based on firm capacity was 11 years (including the remaining life of the PPAs for our assets in advanced stages of construction: CDA, Samay I and Kanan).
F-38
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(h) Employee benefits
(i) Short-term employee benefits
Short-term employee benefits are expensed as the related service is provided. A liability is recognized for the amount expected to be paid if the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee, and the obligation can be estimated reliably.
(ii) Bonus plans transactions
The Groups senior executives receive remuneration in the form of share appreciation rights, which can only be settled in cash (cash-settled transactions). The cost of cash-settled transactions is measured initially at the grant date. With respect to grants made to Inkias senior executives, or the executives of certain of Inkias subsidiaries, this benefit is calculated by dividing the price paid by the Parent Company for Inkia (US$543 million) by the number of Inkia shares outstanding on the grant date and is expensed over the period until the vesting date with recognition of a corresponding liability. With respect to grants made to OPCs senior executives, this benefit is calculated by determining the present value of the settlement (execution) price set forth in the plan. The liability is re-measured at each reporting date and at the settlement date based on the formulas described above. Any changes in the liability are recognized as operating expenses in profit or loss.
For further information on the characteristics of the share appreciation rights provided to certain of the Groups senior executives, see Note 17(b).
(iii) Termination benefits
Severance pay is charged to results when there is a clear obligation to pay termination benefits to the employees before they reach the customary age of retirement according to a formal, detailed plan, without any reasonable chance of cancellation, The benefits given to employees upon voluntary retirement are charged when the Group proposes a plan to the employees encouraging voluntary retirement, it is expected that the proposal will be accepted and the number of employee acceptances can be estimated reliably.
(i) Finance income and finance costs
The Groups finance income and finance costs include:
| Interest income; |
| Interest expense; |
| The net gain or loss on the disposal of available-for-sale financial assets; |
| The net gain or loss on financial assets at fair value through profit or loss; |
F-39
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(i) Finance income and finance costs (contd)
| The foreign currency gain or loss on financial assets and financial liabilities; |
| The fair value loss on contingent consideration classified as financial liability; |
| Impairment losses recognized on financial assets (other than trade receivables); |
| The net gain or loss on hedging instruments that are recognized in profit or loss; and |
| The reclassification of net gains previously recognized in OCI. |
Interest income or expense is recognized using the effective interest method.
(j) Earnings per share
The Group presents basic earnings per share (EPS) data for its common shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent entity by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the period.
(k) Income tax
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. It is recognized in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to a business combination, or items recognized directly in equity or in OCI.
(i) Current tax
Current tax comprises the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year and any adjustment to tax payable or receivable in respect of previous years. It is measured using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date. Current tax also includes any tax liability arising from dividends.
(ii) Deferred tax
Deferred tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognized for:
| Temporary differences on the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor taxable profit or loss; |
| Temporary differences related to investments in subsidiaries and associates where the Group is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is not probable that they will reverse it in the foreseeable future; and |
| Taxable temporary differences arising on the initial recognition of goodwill. |
F-40
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(k) Income tax (contd)
Deferred tax assets are recognized for unused tax losses, unused tax credits and deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be used. Deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized; such reductions are reversed when the probability of future taxable profit improves.
Unrecognized deferred tax assets are reassessed at each reporting date and recognized to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will be available against which they can be used.
Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.
The Group regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability, taking into consideration all available evidence, both positive and negative, including historical pre-tax and taxable income, projected future pre-tax and taxable income and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. In arriving at these judgments, the weight given to the potential effect of all positive and negative evidence is commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified.
The Group believes its tax positions are in compliance with applicable tax laws and regulations. Tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The Group believes that its liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits, including related interest, are adequate in relation to the potential for additional tax assessments. There is a risk, however, that the amounts ultimately paid upon resolution of audits could be materially different from the amounts previously included in our income tax expense and, therefore, could have a material impact on our tax provision, net income and cash flows.
(l) Inventories
Inventories consist of fuel, spare parts, materials and supplies and are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined by using the average cost method.
(m) Trade receivables
Trade receivables are amounts due from customers for the energy and capacity in the ordinary course of business. If collection is expected in one year or less (or in the normal operating cycle of the business if longer), they are classified as current assets. If not, they are presented as non-current assets.
F-41
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(n) Cash and cash equivalents
In the consolidated statement of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less and bank overdrafts. In the consolidated balance sheet, bank overdrafts are shown within borrowings in current liabilities.
(o) Property, plant and equipment
(i) Recognition and measurement
Items of property, plant and equipment comprise mainly power station structures, power distribution facilities and related offices. These items are measured at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.
| The cost of materials and direct labor; |
| any other costs directly attributable to bringing the assets to a working condition for their intended use; |
| when the Group has an obligation to remove the assets or restore the site, an estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on which they are located; and |
| Capitalized borrowing costs. |
If significant parts of an item of property, plant and equipment items have different useful lives, then they are accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.
Any gain or loss on disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognized in profit or loss in the year the asset is derecognized.
(ii) Subsequent costs
Subsequent expenditure is capitalized only if it is probable that the future economic benefits associated with the expenditure will flow to the Group, and its cost can be measured reliably.
(iii) Depreciation
Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost of items of property, plant and equipment less their estimated residual values using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives, and is generally recognized in profit or loss. Leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and their useful lives unless it is reasonably certain that the Group will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term. Land is not depreciated.
F-42
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(o) Property, plant and equipment (contd)
The following useful lives shown on an average basis are applied across the Group:
Years |
||
Buildings |
23 - 43 | |
Thermal power plants |
10 - 35 | |
Hydro-electric |
70 - 90 | |
Wind power plants |
25 | |
Power generation and electrical |
20 | |
Other items |
4 - 10 |
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted if appropriate.
(p) Intangible assets
(i) Recognition and measurement
Goodwill |
Goodwill arising on the acquisition of subsidiaries is measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses. In respect of equity accounted investees, the carrying amount of goodwill is included in the carrying amount of the investment; and any impairment loss is allocated to the carrying amount of the equity investee as a whole | |
Research and development |
Expenditure on research activities is recognized in profit and loss as incurred.
Development activities involve expenditures incurred in connection with the design and evaluation of future power plant projects before the technical feasibility and commercial viability is fully completed, however the Group intends to and has sufficient resources to complete the development and to use or sell the asset.
At each reporting date, the Group performs an evaluation of each project in order to identify facts and circumstances that suggest that the carrying amount of the assets may exceed their recoverable amount |
Customer relationships |
Intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination and are recognized outside of goodwill if the assets are separable or arise from contractual or other legal rights and their fair value can be measured reliably | |
Other intangible assets |
Other intangible assets, including licenses, patents and trademarks, which are acquired by the Group and have finite useful lives, are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses. |
F-43
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(p) Intangible assets (contd)
(ii) Subsequent expenditure
Subsequent expenditure is capitalized only when it increases the future economic benefits embodied in the specific asset to which it relates. All other expenditure, including expenditure on internally generated goodwill is expensed as incurred.
(iii) Amortization
Amortization is calculated to write-off the cost of intangible assets less their estimated residual values using the straight-line method over their useful lives, and is generally recognized in profit or loss. Goodwill is not amortized.
The estimated useful lives for current and comparative period are as follows:
Customer relationship: |
1-12 years | |
Licenses: |
22-27 years | |
Trademarks: |
10 years |
Amortization methods and useful lives are reviewed at each reporting date and adjusted if appropriate.
(q) Financial instruments
The Group classifies non-derivative financial assets into the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit and loss, held-to-maturity financial assets, loans and receivables and available-for-sale financial assets.
The Group classifies non-derivative financial liabilities into the other financial liabilities category.
(i) Non-derivative financial assets and financial liabilitiesrecognition and de-recognition
The Group initially recognizes loans and receivables and debt securities issued on the date that they are originated. All other financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized initially on the trade date.
The Group derecognizes a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or it transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows in a transaction in which substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership and does not retained control over the transferred asset. Any interest in such derecognized financial asset that is created or retained by the Group is recognized as a separate asset or liability.
The Group derecognizes a financial liability when its contractual obligations are discharged, cancelled or expire.
F-44
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(q) Financial instruments (contd)
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the net amount presented in the statement of financial position when, and only when, the Group has a legal right to offset the amounts and intends either to settle them on a net basis or to realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
(ii) Non-derivative financial assetsmeasurement
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss |
A financial asset is classified at fair value through profit or loss if it is classified as held for trading or is designated as such on initial recognition. Direct attributable transaction costs are recognized in profit or loss as incurred. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are measured at fair value, and changes therein, including any interest or dividend income, are recognized in profit or loss. | |
Held-to-maturity financial assets |
These assets are initially measured at fair value plus any direct attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. | |
Loans and receivables |
These assets are measured initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses | |
Available-for-sale financial assets |
These assets are measured initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses and foreign currency differences on debt instruments, are recognized in OCI and accumulated in the fair value reserve. When these assets are derecognized, the gain or loss accumulated in equity is reclassified to profit or loss. |
(iii) Non-derivative financial liabilitiesmeasurement
Non-derivative financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value less any direct attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, these liabilities are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
(iv) Derivative financial instruments and hedge accounting
The Group holds derivative financial instruments to hedge its foreign currency and interest rate risk exposures.
Derivatives are recognized initially at fair value; any direct attributable transaction costs are recognized in profit or loss as incurred. Subsequent to initial recognition, derivatives are measured at fair value, and changes therein are generally recognized in profit or loss.
F-45
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(q) Financial instruments (contd)
(v) Cash flow hedges
When a derivative is designated as a cash flow hedging instrument, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized in OCI and accumulated in the hedging reserve in equity. Any ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
The amount accumulated in equity is retained in OCI and reclassified to profit or loss in the same period or periods during which the hedged item affects profit or loss.
If the hedging instrument no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or the designation is revoked, then hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively. If the forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, then the amount accumulated in equity is reclassified to profit or loss.
(r) Share capitalOrdinary shares
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares, net of any tax effects, are recognized as a deduction from equity.
(s) Impairment
(i) Non-derivative financial assets
Financial assets not classified as at fair value through profit or loss, including an interest in an equity- account investee, are assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is objective evidence of impairment.
Objective evidence that financial assets are impaired includes:
| Default or delinquency by a debtor; |
| Restructuring of an amount due to the Group on terms that the Group would not consider otherwise; |
| Indications that a debtor or issuer will enter bankruptcy; |
| Adverse changes in the payment status of borrowers or issuers; |
| The disappearance of an active market for a security; or |
| Observable data indicating that there is measurable decrease in expected cash flows from a group of financial assets. |
F-46
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(s) Impairment (contd)
For an investment in an equity security, objective evidence of impairment includes a significant or prolonged decline in its fair value below its cost.
Available-for-sale financial assets |
Impairment losses on available-for-sale financial assets are recognized by reclassifying the losses accumulated in the fair value reserve to profit or loss. The amount reclassified is the difference between the acquisition cost (net of any principal repayment and amortization) and the current fair value, less any impairment loss previously recognized in profit or loss. If the fair value of an impaired available-for-sale debt security subsequently increases and the increase can be related objectively to an event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized, then the impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss; otherwise, it is reversed through OCI | |
Equity-account investees |
An impairment loss in respect of an equity-accounted investee is measured by comparing the recoverable amount of the investment with its carrying amount. An impairment loss is recognized in profit or loss, and is reversed if there has been a favorable change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. |
(ii) Non-financial Assets
At each reporting date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its non-financial assets (other than inventories and deferred tax assets) to determine whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the assets recoverable amount is estimated. Goodwill is tested annually for impairment.
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash generating unit (hereinafter CGU) is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell. Value in use is based on the estimated future cash flows, discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset or CGU.
An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount.
Impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss. They are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the CGU, and then to reduce the carrying amounts of the other assets in the CGU on a pro rata basis.
An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. For other assets, an impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the assets carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
F-47
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 2Significant accounting policies (contd)
(t) Provisions
Provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The unwinding of the discount is recognized as finance cost.
(u) Leases
(i) Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease
At inception of an arrangement, the Group determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease.
At inception or on reassessment of an arrangement that contains a lease, the Group separates payments and other consideration required by the arrangement into those for the lease and those for the other elements on the basis of their relative fair values. If the Group concludes for a finance lease that is impracticable to separate the payments reliably, then an asset and a liability are recognized at an amount equal to the fair value of the underlying asset; subsequently, the liability is reduced as payments are made and an imputed finance cost on the liability is recognized using the Groups incremental borrowing rate.
(ii) Leased assets
Assets held by the Group under leases that transfer to the Group substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership are classified as finance leases. The leased assets are measured initially at an amount equal to the lower of their fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments. Subsequent to initial recognition, the assets are accounted for in accordance with the accounting policy applicable to that asset.
Asset held under other leases are classified as operating leases and are not recognized in the Groups consolidated statement of financial position
(iii) Lease payments
Payments made under operating leases are recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Lease incentives received are recognized as an integral part of the total lease expense, over the term of the lease.
Minimum lease payments made under finance leases are apportioned between the finance expense and the reduction of the outstanding liability. The finance expense is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a constant periodic rate if interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
Note 3Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements
(a) Use of Estimates and Judgments
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRSs requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amount of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recorded prospectively.
F-48
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 3Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements (contd)
(a) Use of Estimates and Judgments (contd)
Information about assumptions, estimation uncertainties and critical judgments that have the most significant effect on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements is included in the following notes:
| Note 4Fair value adjustments for business combination in accordance with IFRS 3, and the measurement of assets, liabilities and goodwill; |
| Notes 12 and 13Useful life of the property, plant and equipment and intangible assets; |
| Note 13Key assumptions used in discounted cash flow projections; |
| Note 25Utilization of tax losses. |
| Note 31Probability of occurrence and uncertainty of amount of liabilities for contingent liabilities. |
(b) Reclassification
Reclassifications were made to the financial statements of Financial Position, Statement of Income and Cash Flows as at December 31, 2013, as at December 31, 2012, and for the years ended on those dates regarding: provisions are presented in a separate line in the statement of Financial Position, depreciation and amortization expenses presented in a separate line and not as part of cost of sales in the statement of income since this presentation is more appropriate for our companies.
US$ thousand |
||||||||||||
Original |
Reclassifications |
Modified |
||||||||||
As at December 31, 2013: |
||||||||||||
Statement of Financial Position |
||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||
Trade payables |
113,124 | (21,573 | ) | 91,551 | ||||||||
Provisions |
| 21,573 | 21,573 | |||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2013: |
||||||||||||
Statement of Income |
||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(665,429 | ) | 71,627 | (593,802 | ) | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (71,627 | ) | (71,627 | ) | |||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2012: |
||||||||||||
Statement of Income |
||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(446,959 | ) | 51,426 | (395,533 | ) | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
| (51,426 | ) | (51,426 | ) |
F-49
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 3Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements (contd)
(b) Reclassification (contd)
US$ thousand |
||||||||||||
Original |
Reclassifications |
Modified |
||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2013: |
||||||||||||
Statement of Comprehensive Income |
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences in respect of foreign operations |
(24,262 | ) | 26,268 | 2,006 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences from discontinued operations that will be transferred to profit or loss |
| (26,268 | ) | (26,268 | ) | |||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2012: |
||||||||||||
Statement of Comprehensive Income |
||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences in respect of foreign operations |
10,864 | (10,460 | ) | 404 | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation differences from discontinued operations that will be transferred to profit or loss |
| 10,460 | 10,460 | |||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2013: |
||||||||||||
Statement of Cash flow |
||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||
Change in trade and other receivables |
(62,054 | ) | 8,082 | (53,972 | ) | |||||||
Change in trade and other payables |
68,946 | (20,742 | ) | 48,204 | ||||||||
Change in provisions and employee benefits |
1,025 | 20,742 | 21,767 | |||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Acquisition of fixed assets |
(287,957 | ) | (5,884 | ) | (293,841 | ) | ||||||
Payment from transactions in derivatives, net |
(9,929 | ) | 9,929 | | ||||||||
Value Added Tax, net of project under construction |
| (8,082 | ) | (8,082 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Receipt of long-term loans, capital notes and debentures |
320,344 | 2,719 | 323,063 | |||||||||
Interest paid |
(55,677 | ) | (4,045 | ) | (59,722 | ) | ||||||
Short-term credit from banks and others, net |
135,663 | 2,967 | `138,630 | |||||||||
Issuance expenses |
| (5,686 | ) | (5,686 | ) | |||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2012: |
||||||||||||
Statement of Cash flow |
||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities |
||||||||||||
Bad debt expense |
| 131 | 131 | |||||||||
Gain (loss) on disposal of property, plant and equipment |
| (980 | ) | (980 | ) | |||||||
Change in trade and other receivables |
(24,178 | ) | 7,472 | (16,706 | ) | |||||||
Change in trade and other payables |
(2,674 | ) | 980 | (1,694 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities |
||||||||||||
Acquisition of fixed assets |
(356,694 | ) | (14,666 | ) | (371,360 | ) | ||||||
Payment from transactions in derivatives, net |
(20,017 | ) | 20,017 | | ||||||||
Value Added Tax, net of project under construction |
| (7,603 | ) | (7,603 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||||||
Interest paid |
(31,694 | ) | (5,351 | ) | (37,045 | ) |
F-50
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 4Business combinations
(a) Subsidiaries acquired in 2013
On September 5, 2013, IC Power through its subsidiaries IC Power Inversiones Limitada and IC Power Chile SpA entered into an agreement with Inversiones Pacific Hydro Tinguiririca Ltda and SN Power Chile Tinguiririca y Compañía (the sellers) to acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of Thermoelectrica Colmito Ltda (Colmito), for a consideration of US$ 27,850 thousand: At such date, this amount was contributed into an escrow account until certain conditions related to the sale were fulfilled. Colmito owns and operates a 58MW dual fuel open cycle generation plant located in Concón, Chile that commenced operations in August 2008. The closing of this acquisition was completed on October 29, 2013. At such date, IC Power took control of Colmito and released the funds held in the escrow account.
The total fair values of acquired net assets (in thousands of U.S. Dollars) were as follows:
Total |
||||
Intangibles |
2,490 | |||
Property, plant and equipment |
26,637 | |||
Deferred tax assets |
43 | |||
|
|
|||
Total net assets at fair value |
29,170 | |||
Consideration paid |
27,850 | |||
|
|
|||
Negative goodwill |
1,320 | |||
|
|
Consequently, IC Power recorded a bargain purchase gain of US$ 1,320 thousand.
(b) Subsidiaries acquired in 2014
During 2014, IC Power acquired the following companies:
AEI Nicaragua Holdings Ltd.
On February 18, 2014, IC Power entered into an agreement with AEI Power Ltd. to acquire all of the shares of AEI Nicaragua Holdings Ltd and AEI Jamaica Holdings Ltd for a purchase price of US$ 54,144 thousand. On March 12, 2014, Inkia took control of AEI Nicaragua Holdings and paid US$ 36,644 thousand to AEI Power Ltd in connection with the acquisition. As a result of the post-closing purchase price adjustments, AEI Ltd refunded US$ 6,523 thousand to IC Power on April 14, 2014, therefore, the final purchase price of AEI Nicaragua Holdings was US$ 30,121 thousand.
AEI Jamaica Holdings Ltd.
On May 30, 2014, IC Power took control of AEI Jamaica Holdings and paid US$ 17,500 thousand to AEI Power Ltd in connection with the acquisition. As a result of the post-closing purchase price adjustments, IC Power paid an additional of US$ 3,177 thousand to AEI Power Ltd. on July 1, 2014; therefore, the final purchase price of AEI Jamaica Holdings was US$ 20,677 thousand.
As of result of this transaction, IC Power increased its ownership from 15.57% to 100% in Jamaica Private Power Company (a subsidiary of AEI Jamaica Holdings). The measurement to fair value of IC
F-51
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 4Business combinations (contd)
(b) Subsidiaries acquired in 2014 (contd)
Powers pre-existing share in Jamaica Power Company resulted in a gain of US$ 2,674 thousand (US$ 6,044 thousand less US$ 3,370 thousand carrying amount of such investment at the acquisition date).
Surpetroil
On March 12, 2014, IC Power through its subsidiary Samay III signed a share purchase agreement with Yesid Gasca and Adriana Lopez to acquire a 60.00% stake of Surpetroil SAS, a company involved in power generation, natural gas transport and distribution using Colombias stranded gas, as well as a 60% stake in 2 companies: Surenergy SAS ESP (Colombia) and Surpetroil SAC (Peru) for a total purchase price of US$ 18,000 thousand. On March 28, 2014, IC Power took control of Surpetroil and paid US$ 12,000 thousand at closing. The remaining US$ 6,000 thousand has been retained by IC Power to be reinvested by the minority shareholders in new projects.
AEI Guatemala Holdings Ltd.
On August 13, 2014, IC Power entered into an agreement with AEI Power Ltd. to acquire all of the shares of AEI Guatemala Holdings Ltd for a purchase price of US$ 29,000 thousand. On September 17, 2014, IC Power completed the acquisition of AEI Guatemala Holdings and paid US$ 29,000 thousand to AEI Power Ltd.
On October 22, 2014, IC Power paid an additional of US$ 5,568 thousand as a result of the post-closing purchase price adjustments, and US$ 350 thousand for reorganization costs. Therefore, the final purchase price of AEI Guatemala Holdings was US$ 34,918 thousand.
F-52
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 4Business combinations (contd)
(c) Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
The following table summarizes the recognized amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition:
In thousands of US$ |
Note |
AEI
|
AEI
|
Surpetroil |
AEI
|
Total |
||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
12 | 157,211 | 39,585 | 15,173 | 60,896 | 272,865 | ||||||||||||||||||
Intangible |
13 | 20,783 | 3,305 | 5,168 | 925 | 30,181 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax assets |
2,375 | 179 | 201 | 76 | 2,831 | |||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables, net |
29,072 | 5,998 | 900 | 31,939 | 67,909 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
40,716 | 24,325 | 1,835 | 38,777 | 105,653 | |||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
| -1,722 | -2,361 | -17,500 | -21,583 | |||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
-115,241 | -10,199 | -2,390 | -23,021 | -150,851 | |||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
-33,722 | -1,102 | -2,671 | -7,550 | -45,045 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
-16,804 | -9,532 | -2,901 | -29,181 | -58,418 | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
-30,618 | | -5,182 | | -35,800 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total net assets |
53,772 | 50,837 | 7,772 | 55,361 | 167,742 | |||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of pre-existing share |
| -6,044 | | | -6,044 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total consideration |
-30,121 | -20,677 | -18,000 | -34,918 | -103,716 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
23,651 | 24,116 | | 20,443 | 68,210 | |||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill* |
| | 10,228 | | 10,228 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash consideration |
30,121 | 20,677 | 12,000 | 34,918 | 97,716 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consideration retained by IC Power |
| | 6,000 | | 6,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total consideration transferred |
30,121 | 20,677 | 12,000 | 34,918 | 97,716 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalent acquired |
-19,310 | -5,371 | -168 | -2,881 | -27,730 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net cash flow on acquisition |
10,811 | 15,306 | 11,832 | 32,037 | 69,986 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | This amount is not deductible for tax purposes. |
(d) Measurement of fair values
IC Power has measured the value of the acquired assets, liabilities, and contingent liabilities considering the fair value basis on March 12, 2014; March 28, 2014; May 30, 2014; and on September 17, 2014, dates in which IC Power took control of AEI Nicaragua Holdings, Surpetroil, AEI Jamaica Holdings and AEI Guatemala Holdings, respectively. The criteria considered to measured the fair value of the main items were the following:
| Fixed assets were valued considering the market value provided by an appraiser; |
| Intangibles consider the valuation of its Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs); |
| Contingent liabilities were determined over the average probability established by third party legal processes; |
| Deferred taxes were valued based on the temporary differences between the accounting and tax basis of the business combination; and, |
| Non-controlling interests were measured as a proportional basis of the net assets identified on the acquisition date. |
F-53
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 4Business combinations (contd)
(e) Gain of bargain purchase
After reviewing and analyzing the fair values of the Nicaraguan, Jamaican and Guatemalan assets and compare them to the carrying value, a gain on bargain purchase of US$ 23,651, US$ 24,116 and US$ 20,443, respectively, was determined. The differences between fair value and carrying value are derived in principal:
| Seller´s need to complete transaction. |
| Lack of alternative buyers. |
| Regions low interest from international power players. |
(f) Recognition of Revenues and Profit or Loss
During the period from the acquisition date to December 31, 2014 the revenues and profit or loss contributed by these acquired companies to the consolidated results are as follows:
Companies acquired |
Control Date |
Revenues |
Profit (loss)* |
|||||||
AEI Nicaragua Holdings Ltd |
March 12, 2014 | 124,578 | 5,874 | |||||||
Surpetroil S.A.S. |
March 28, 2014 | 9,263 | 1,759 | |||||||
AEI Jamaica Holdings Ltd. |
May 30, 2014 | 40,752 | (2,242 | ) | ||||||
AEI Guatemala Holdings Ltd. |
September 17, 2014 | 33,302 | (1,028 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
207,895 | 4,363 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
* | These figures do not include any effect arising from the purchase price allocation adjustments and from non-controlling interest. |
Note 5Discontinued operations
On September 3, 2014, Inkia Americas Holdings Ltd. (the Seller), and IC Power as guarantor of the Seller, closed the sale of its shares in Inkia Holdings (Acter) Limited (Acter), that indirectly holds the equivalent of 39.01% of Generandes Peru SA, the holding company of Edegel SAA for a total consideration of US$413,000 thousand in cash.
As a consequence of the sale of Acter, IC Power transferred all the following companies to Enersis: Southern Cone Power Ltd., Latin America Holding I Ltd., Latin America Holding II Ltd. and Southern Cone Power Peru S.A.A.
Pursuant to the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement, prior to the consummation of the Acter Disposition, Acter was required to repay the outstanding indebtedness (the Acter Debt) held with Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch. In order to repay the Acter Debt, Seller received a short-term loan from IC Power on August 26, 2014 in an amount of US$125,000 thousand (the Acter Contribution), and used the proceeds to repay the Acter Debt on August 27, 2014.
F-54
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 5Discontinued operations (contd)
(a) Results of discontinued operation
In thousands of US$ |
||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
Administrative expenses |
(568 | ) | (119 | ) | (106 | ) | ||||||
Other income |
14,595 | | | |||||||||
Financing income |
47 | | 45 | |||||||||
Finance cost |
(6,384 | ) | (313 | ) | (281 | ) | ||||||
Share of profit in associates |
11,542 | 30,089 | 30,710 | |||||||||
Income tax |
(1,049 | ) | (1,230 | ) | (1,252 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
18,183 | 28,427 | 29,116 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Capital Gain on Acter sale |
132,246 | | | |||||||||
Recycling of foreign exchange |
24,891 | | | |||||||||
Income tax on gain on sale of discontinued operation |
(47,265 | ) | | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net gain on sale of discontinued operations |
109,872 | | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income from discontinued operation, net of tax |
128,055 | 28,427 | 29,116 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net income from discontinued operations is 100% attributable to owner of the Company.
(b) Cash flows from discontinued operation :
In thousands of US$ |
||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
26,350 | 25,890 | 15,153 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by investing activities |
359,938 | | | |||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(128,709 | ) | | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash flow from discontinued operations |
257,579 | 25,890 | 15,153 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
On September 16, 2014, the Company received the consent to reinvest the Net Cash Proceeds related to the Acter Disposition within 30 months (originally was 365 days) of such asset sale.
Inkia expects to reinvest the net cash proceeds from the Edegel sale.
(c) Effect of disposal on the financial position of the Group
The net cash proceeds from Acter disposition are as follows:
In thousands of US$ |
||||
2014 |
||||
Consideration received |
413,000 | |||
Transaction costs |
(5,844 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total net proceeds |
407,156 | |||
Income tax paid |
(47,265 | ) | ||
Other |
47 | |||
|
|
|||
Net cash proceeds from Acter disposition |
359,938 | |||
|
|
F-55
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 5Discontinued operations (contd)
(c) Effect of disposal on the financial position of the Group (contd)
The disposal group comprised assets and liabilities as following:
In thousands of US$ |
||||
2014 |
||||
Assets: |
||||
Other receivables |
104 | |||
Income tax receivable |
49 | |||
Investment in associated companies (Note 11) |
280,113 | |||
|
|
|||
Total assets of disposal group |
280,266 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities: |
||||
Other payables |
5,355 | |||
|
|
|||
Total liabilities of disposal group |
5,355 | |||
|
|
|||
Net assets of disposal group |
274,911 | |||
|
|
Note 6Cash and cash equivalents
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Cash and balance in banks |
393,631 | 418,818 | ||||||
Time deposits |
189,665 | 97,986 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
583,296 | 516,804 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
The Groups exposure to credit risk, interest rate risk and currency risk and a sensitivity analysis with respect to the financial assets and liabilities is detailed in Note 29, regarding Financial Instruments and Risk Management.
Note 7Short-term deposits and restricted cash
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Short-Term deposits in banks (a) |
119,316 | 2,727 | ||||||
Restricted cashcurrent |
88,330 | 6,383 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
207,646 | 9,110 | |||||||
Restricted cashnon-current |
28,351 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
235,997 | 9,110 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | Corresponds to time deposits between 91 and 182 days set by Inkia from the proceeds of Acter sale in 2014, see note 5. |
F-56
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 8Trade receivables
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Open accounts |
182,117 | 138,958 | ||||||
Lessallowance for doubtful debts |
(759 | ) | (697 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
181,358 | 138,261 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
In connection with business combination of AEI Nicaragua Holding, AEI Jamaica Holding, AEI Guatemala Holding and Surpetroil, the Group increased its account receivable by US$ 67,909 thousand. This amount is shown net of US$ 12,247 of allowance for doubtful debts
Note 9Other receivables and debit balances, including derivative instruments
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Government agencies (a) |
31,822 | 14,856 | ||||||
Advances to suppliers |
26 | 110 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses |
10,679 | 11,314 | ||||||
Employees |
2,069 | 1,492 | ||||||
Insurance claims |
8,040 | | ||||||
Other receivables |
5,470 | 2,714 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
58,106 | 30,486 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | The balance corresponds mainly to the VAT incurred in the construction of Cerro del Aguila and Samay I (Puerto Bravo) projects. Both projects have the tax benefit of recovering the VAT incurred during the construction stage on a regular basis. |
Note 10Inventories
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Fuel (a) |
11,873 | 6,252 | ||||||
Spare parts (b) |
43,462 | 22,316 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
55,335 | 28,568 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | As of December 31, 2014, US$7,425 thousand corresponds to fuel inventories related to the subsidiaries acquired during 2014, see note 4. |
The plants in El Salvador, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Jamaica and Dominican Republic consume heavy fuel and the plants in Chile consume diesel for the generation of electric energy. These plants must purchase fuel in the international market and import it into the respective countries. The plants must take into consideration demand for the electric energy, available supply and transportation cost and timing when purchasing fuel.
F-57
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 10Inventories (contd)
(b) | Corresponds to spare parts held in storage to be used in maintenance work. As of December 31, 2014, US$19,861 thousand corresponds to spare parts related to the subsidiaries purchased. |
During 2014, the Group recorded an expense of US$ 1,992 thousand in cost of sales to present its fuel inventories at net realizable value.
Note 11Investments in associated companies
In thousands of US$ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity accounted Investee |
Interest |
Beginning
|
Equity
|
Cumulative
|
Discontinued
|
Dividends
|
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Associates |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Generandes Peru |
39.00 | % | 276,538 | 11,542 | 3,860 | (280,113 | ) | (11,827 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||
S.A. Pedregal |
21.22 | % | 9,847 | 2,000 | | | (2,222 | ) | 9,625 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
286,385 | 13,542 | 3,860 | (280,113 | ) | (14,049 | ) | 9,625 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
In thousands of US$ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity accounted Investee |
Interest |
Beginning
|
Equity
|
Cumulative
|
Others |
Dividends
|
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Associates |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Generandes Peru |
39.00 | % | 298,711 | 30,089 | (26,372 | ) | | (25,890 | ) | 276,538 | ||||||||||||||||||
S.A. Pedregal |
21.22 | % | 12,830 | 1,929 | | | (4,912 | ) | 9,847 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total |
311,541 | 32,018 | (26,372 | ) | | (30,802 | ) | 286,385 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the last semester of 2013, the Company announced its decision to sell its 39.01% direct equity in Generandes Peru S.A. (Holding of Edegel S.A.A.)
In April 2014, the board of directors of the Company approved the sale of Generandes Peru S.A. IC Power recorded its investment in Generandes Peru S.A. as an associate, applying the equity method until April 30, 2014. Since such date, the Company has classified this investment as held for sale at the lowest amount between its carrying amount of US$ 280,113 thousand and its fair value less costs to sell amount of approximately US$ 407,156 thousand.
On April 30, 2014, Inkia Americas Holdings Ltd. (the Seller) and the Company as guarantor of the Seller, signed a share purchase agreement with Enersis SA (Enersis) for the sale of its shares in Inkia Holdings (Acter) Limited that owns 21.14% indirect equity in Edegel S.A.A. for a sale price of US$ 413,000 thousand.
On September 3, 2014, Inkia Americas Holdings Ltd. completed the sale of its shares in Inkia Holdings (Acter) Limited, that has directly the equivalent of 39.01% of Generandes Peru S. A., see note 5.
F-58
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 12Property, plant and equipment
A. Composition
As at December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at
|
Additions |
Disposals |
Write-off |
Translation
|
Acquisitions
|
Transfers
And
|
Balance at
of year |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land, roads, buildings and leasehold improvements |
252,464 | 24,829 | (317 | ) | | (4,907 | ) | 6,997 | 355 | 279,421 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Installations, machinery and equipment |
1,469,269 | 107,475 | (8,704 | ) | | (55,095 | ) | 259,194 | 20,902 | 1,793,041 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dams |
138,538 | | (278 | ) | | | | | 138,260 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Plants under construction |
387,773 | 405,771 | (314 | ) | | (23 | ) | 480 | (4,006 | ) | 789,681 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Office furniture and equipment and motor vehicles |
16,819 | 3,625 | (825 | ) | | (477 | ) | 2,769 | 762 | 22,673 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Spare parts to plants |
28,076 | 29,714 | (1,147 | ) | | (1,099 | ) | 3,004 | (20,149 | ) | 38,399 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other equipment |
20,290 | 5,174 | (735 | ) | | (1,112 | ) | 421 | 328 | 24,366 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
2,313,229 | 576,588 | (12,320 | ) | | (62,713 | ) | 272,865 | (1,808 | ) | 3,085,841 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land, roads, buildings and leasehold Improvements |
55,782 | 6,232 | (28 | ) | 2,229 | (190 | ) | | | 64,025 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Installations, machinery and equipment |
325,298 | 92,395 | (2,205 | ) | 17,356 | (3,198 | ) | | (23 | ) | 429,623 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dams |
28,944 | 1,674 | (30 | ) | 14,901 | | | | 45,489 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Office furniture and equipment and motor vehicles |
11,810 | 2,854 | (636 | ) | 120 | (33 | ) | | | 14,115 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Spare parts to plants |
10,638 | 1,037 | (286 | ) | | | | (75 | ) | 11,314 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other equipment |
5,802 | 443 | (130 | ) | 67 | (3 | ) | | (3 | ) | 6,176 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
438,274 | 104,635 | (3,315 | ) | 34,673 | (3,424 | ) | | (101 | ) | 570,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2014 |
1,874,955 | 471,953 | (9,005 | ) | (34,673 | ) | (59,289 | ) | 272,865 | (1,707 | ) | 2,515,099 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-59
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 12Property, plant and equipment (contd)
A. Composition (contd)
As at December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at
of year |
Additions |
Disposals |
Translation
|
Acquisitions
|
Transfers
And
|
Balance at
of year |
||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land, roads, buildings and leasehold improvements |
202,903 | 10,278 | (96 | ) | 2,726 | 1,524 | 35,129 | 252,464 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Installations, machinery and equipment |
938,288 | 58,561 | (5,366 | ) | 32,395 | 23,711 | 421,680 | 1,469,269 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dams |
138,538 | | | | | | 138,538 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Plants under construction |
627,049 | 199,561 | | | | (438,837 | ) | 387,773 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Office furniture and equipment and motor vehicles |
15,325 | 1,332 | (599 | ) | 31 | 49 | 681 | 16,819 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Spare parts to plants |
17,432 | 27,056 | (123 | ) | 234 | 1,354 | (17,877 | ) | 28,076 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other equipment |
9321 | 16081 | (6,244 | ) | 429 | | 703 | 20,290 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
1,948,856 | 312,869 | (12,428 | ) | 35,815 | 26,638 | 1,479 | 2,313,229 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land, roads, buildings and leasehold Improvements |
50,874 | 4876 | (2 | ) | 26 | | 8 | 55,782 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Installations, machinery and equipment |
261,258 | 64,108 | (1,924 | ) | 461 | | 1,395 | 325,298 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dams |
27,206 | 1,738 | | | | | 28,944 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Office furniture and equipment and motor vehicles |
11,070 | 1,159 | (573 | ) | 12 | | 142 | 11,810 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Spare parts to plants |
9,536 | 1,199 | (97 | ) | | | | 10,638 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other equipment |
5,580 | 237 | (15 | ) | | | | 5,802 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
365,524 | 73,317 | (2,611 | ) | 499 | | 1,545 | 438,274 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2013 |
1,583,332 | 239,552 | (9,817 | ) | 35,316 | 26,638 | (66 | ) | 1,874,955 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Depreciated balances
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Land, roads, buildings and leasehold improvements |
215,396 | 196,682 | ||||||
Installations, machinery and equipment |
1,363,418 | 1,143,971 | ||||||
Dams |
92,771 | 109,594 | ||||||
Plants under construction |
789,681 | 387,773 | ||||||
Office furniture and equipment and motor vehicles |
8,558 | 5,009 | ||||||
Spare parts to plants |
27,085 | 17,438 | ||||||
Other equipment |
18,190 | 14,488 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
2,515,099 | 1,874,955 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
C. | During the period ended December 31, 2014, the Group acquired assets with a cost of US$576,588 thousand, mainly for the construction of the Cerro del Aguila and Samay I projects, the acquisition of Las Flores power plant, and US$272,865 thousand in connection with AEI Nicaragua Holdings Ltd, AEI Jamaica Holdings Ltd, AEI Guatemala Holdings Ltd and Surpetroil business combinations, see note 4. |
F-60
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 12Property, plant and equipment (contd)
Cerro del Aguila (CDA) is a run-of-the-river hydroelectric project on the Mantaro River located in Huancavelica, in central Peru. The plant will have an installed capacity of 510 MW. Construction of the hydroelectric plant is underway (approximately 64% advanced as of December 31, 2014). It is expected that CDA will commence commercial operation during the second half of 2016 and it is estimated to cost approximately US$910,000 thousand, including a US$50,000 thousand budget for contingencies. The CDA Project is financed with a US$591,000 thousand syndicated credit facility, representing 65% of the total estimated cost of the project, with export credit agencies, development banks and private banks, and is collateralized by the assets of the project. The remaining 35% of the CDA Projects cost has been financed with equity from each of Inkia and Energía del Pacífico, in proportion to their ownership interests in CDA.
On November 29, 2013, Samay I won a public bid auction conducted by the Peruvian Investment Promotion Agency to build an open cycle diesel and natural gas (dual-fired) thermoelectric plant in Mollendo, Arequipa (southern Peru), with an installed capacity of approximately 600 MW at an estimated cost of US$380,000 thousand, approximately 80% of which is to be financed with a US$311,000 thousand seven-year syndicated secured loan agreement with Bank of Tokyo, Sumitomo and HSBC and approximately 20% of which has been financed with equity from Inkia and Energía del Pacífico. Samay Is agreement with the Peruvian government is for a 20-year period, with fixed monthly capacity payments and pass-through of all variable costs. Construction of Samay Is thermoelectric plant is in its early stages and it is expected that Samay I will commence commercial operations in mid-2016, in accordance with the terms of its agreement with the Peruvian government.
In April 2014, Kallpa Generacion S.A., a subsidiary of Inkia, completed its US$114,000 thousand purchase of the 193 MW single turbine natural gas fired plant Las Flores, located in Chilca, Peru. Las Flores, which commenced its commercial operation in May 2010, permits for a future 190 MW gas-fired expansion and has sufficient space to locate such a facility, as well as a combined cycle expansion, on its existing premises.
D. When there is any indication of impairment, the Groups entities perform impairment tests for their long lived assets using fair values less cost to sell based on independent appraisals or value in use estimations, with similar assumptions as those described in note 13(c). In September 2014, a subsidiary of Inkia updated its five-year budget as a result of a downward trend in its results combined with anticipated impacts of recent political changes in the country in which the subsidiary operates, which affects the power generation business therein, and expectations of an increase in operating costs and unchanged electricity prices, which will lead to a decrease in its profitability. As a result, Inkia considered a potential impairment in this subsidiary and conducted an impairment analysis using the value in use method and a discount rate of 7.6%. Accordingly, Inkia determined that the book value of the subsidiarys assets exceeded its recoverable amount and therefore recorded an impairment loss of US$34,673 thousand.
E. During 2014, the Company capitalized financing expenses to property, plant and equipment in the amount of US$52,124 thousands (US$17,381 thousands in 2013).
F-61
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 12Property, plant and equipment (contd)
F. Property, plant and equipment includes assets acquired through finance leases. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the cost and corresponding accumulated depreciation of such assets are as follows:
In thousands of US$ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, 2014 |
As of December 31, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
Accumulated
|
Net cost |
Cost |
Accumulated
|
Net cost |
|||||||||||||||||||
Land and buildings |
42,280 | (4,488 | ) | 37,792 | 29,880 | (3,509 | ) | 26,371 | ||||||||||||||||
Plant and equipment |
277,272 | (88,679 | ) | 188,593 | 178,516 | (72,409 | ) | 106,107 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
319,552 | (93,167 | ) | 226,385 | 208,396 | (75,918 | ) | 132,478 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. The composition of the depreciation expense is as follows:
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Depreciation charged to results |
104,337 | 73,142 | ||||||
Depreciation charged to fixed assets |
298 | 175 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
104,635 | 73,317 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
F-62
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 13Intangible assets
A. Composition:
Goodwill |
Client
Relationships (a) |
Licenses | Software | Other (b) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at January 1, 2013 |
51,627 | 16,601 | 1,008 | 787 | 21,851 | 91,874 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions as part of business Combinations |
| | | | 2,490 | 2,490 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitionsself Development |
| | 4 | 377 | 8,765 | 9,146 | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation differences |
| | | 31 | | 31 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2013 |
51,627 | 16,601 | 1,012 | 1,195 | 33,106 | 103,541 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Acquisitions as part of business combinations |
10,228 | 24,473 | 49 | | 5,659 | 40,409 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitionsself development |
| | 21 | 263 | 15,516 | 15,800 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification |
| | | | (1,905 | ) | (1,905 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Translation differences |
(1,826 | ) | | 1 | (73 | ) | | (1,898 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2014 |
60,029 | 41,074 | 1,083 | 1,385 | 52,376 | 155,947 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Amortization and declines in value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at January 1, 2013 |
| 7,781 | 234 | 384 | 2,299 | 10,698 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization for the year |
| 1,415 | 67 | 98 | 872 | 2,452 | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation differences |
| | | 6 | | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2013 |
| 9,196 | 301 | 488 | 3,171 | 13,156 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Amortization for the year |
| 3,395 | 77 | 122 | 482 | 4,076 | ||||||||||||||||||
Translation differences |
| | | (19 | ) | | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2014 |
| 12,591 | 378 | 591 | 3,653 | 17,213 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Carrying value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
As at December 31, 2013 |
51,627 | 7,405 | 711 | 707 | 29,935 | 90,385 | ||||||||||||||||||
As at December 31, 2014 |
60,029 | 28,483 | 705 | 794 | 48,723 | 138,734 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Intangible assets comprise mainly assets identified as a result of the business combination, such as the acquisition of client relationships and others in the purchase of its subsidiaries. |
Amortization of intangibles is included in depreciation and amortization in the income statement.
(b) The 2014 and 2013 additions in the caption others include mainly development cost. Expenditures incurred in the design and evaluation of future power plant facilities in the countries in which the Company currently operates. These projects have different level of advance such as: temporal concessions, environmental impact studies in process and others.
As of December 31, 2014, balance of others intangible assets mainly corresponds to cost incurred in the construction and improvements of public access roads in connection with CDA project.
F-63
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 13Intangible assets (contd)
(c) Goodwill arises from the following Group entities (cash generating unit):
In thousands of US$ |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Nejapa Power Company LLC and Compañia de Energía de Centroamerica S.A. de C.V. |
40,693 | 40,693 | ||||||
Kallpa Generación S.A. |
10,934 | 10,934 | ||||||
Surpetroil S.A.C. |
8,402 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Book value |
60,029 | 51,627 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(d) Impairment testing
The recoverable amount of each CGU is based on the estimated value in use using discounted cash flows. The cash flows are derived from the 5-year budget approved by the Board of Directors and its Shareholders.
The key assumptions used in the estimation of the recoverable amount are set below. The values assigned to key assumptions represent management´s assessment of future trends in the power sector and have been based on historic data from external and internal sources.
(Percentage) |
2014 |
2013 |
||||||
Discount rate |
||||||||
Peru |
6.9 | 7.6 | ||||||
El Salvador |
9.2 | 9.7 | ||||||
Colombia |
11.1 | | ||||||
Terminal value growth rate |
2.0 | 2.0 |
The discount rate is a post-tax measure based on the characteristics of each CGU with a possible debt leveraging of 43% in 2014 and of 40% in 2013.
The cash flow projections included specific estimates for five years and a terminal growth rate thereafter. The terminal growth rate was determined based on management´s estimate of the long term inflation
In addition to the discount and growth rates, the key assumptions used to estimate future cash flows, based on past experience and current sector forecasts, are as follows:
| Existing power purchase agreements (PPAs) signed |
| Investment scheduleThe management has used the updated investment schedule in countries in which those companies operate, in order that the supply satisfies the demand growth in an efficient manner. |
| The production mix of each country was determined using specifically-developed internal forecast models that consider factors such as prices and availability of commodities, forecast demand of electricity, planned construction or the commissioning of new capacity in the countrys various technologies. |
F-64
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 13Intangible assets (contd)
| Fuel prices have been calculated based on existing supply contracts and on estimated future prices including a price differential adjustment specific to every product according to local characteristics. |
| Assumptions for energy sale and purchase prices and output of generation facilities are made based on complex specifically-developed internal forecast models for each country. |
| DemandDemand forecast has taken into consideration the best economic performance as well as growth forecasts of different sources. |
| Technical performanceThe forecast take into consideration that the power plants have an appropriate preventive maintenance that permits their proper functioning. |
(e) Sensitivity to changes in assumptions
With regard to the assessment of value in use of the CGUs, management believes that no reasonably possible change in any of the above key assumptions would cause the carrying value of the unit to materially exceed its recoverable amount.
F-65
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others
This note provides information regarding the contractual conditions of the Groups interest bearing loans and credit, which are measured based on amortized cost. Additional information regarding the Groups exposure to interest risks, foreign currency and liquidity risk, is provided in Note 31, in connection with financial instruments.
A. Composition
As at
|
As at December 31,2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Nominal annual |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate |
Maturity |
Current |
Non-Current |
Current |
Non-Current |
|||||||||||||||
Short-term loans from banks |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cepp |
||||||||||||||||||||
Various entities |
3.25-4.00% | 2014/2015 | 5,000 | | 22,850 | | ||||||||||||||
Kallpa Generación |
||||||||||||||||||||
Banco de Crédito del Perú |
1.15% | 2015 | 29,107 | | | | ||||||||||||||
Cobee |
||||||||||||||||||||
Various entities |
5.00%-7.00% | 2014/2015 | 12,503 | | 7,601 | | ||||||||||||||
Acter |
||||||||||||||||||||
Credit Suisse (D) |
LIBOR + 4% | 2014 | | 122,073 | | |||||||||||||||
Surpetroil |
2015 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Various entities |
3.10- 3.93% | 2015 | 1,527 | | | | ||||||||||||||
PQP |
2015 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Banco Industrial Guatemala |
4.75% | 2015 | 10,000 | | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
58,137 | | 152,524 | | ||||||||||||||||
Loans from Banks and others |
||||||||||||||||||||
Financial institutions: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cobee |
||||||||||||||||||||
Various entities |
TRE+4.75-
TRE+6.0% |
2014 | | | 678 | | ||||||||||||||
Kallpa Generación (E) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Syndicated LoanVarious entities |
LIBOR+5.75% | 2019 | 13,895 | 58,663 | 13,788 | 72,559 | ||||||||||||||
Central Cardones (F) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tranche One |
||||||||||||||||||||
BCI / Banco Itaú |
LIBOR+1.9% | 2021 | 3,276 | 25,536 | 3,024 | 28,812 | ||||||||||||||
Tranche Two |
||||||||||||||||||||
BCI / Banco Itaú |
LIBOR+2.8% | 2017 | | 19,384 | | 19,384 | ||||||||||||||
Cerro del Aguila (G) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tranch A |
LIBOR+4.25% | 2024 | | 257,022 | | 62,792 | ||||||||||||||
Tranche B |
LIBOR+4.25% | 2024 | | 138,396 | | 33,811 | ||||||||||||||
Tranche 1D |
LIBOR+4.25% | 2024 | | 31,766 | | 7,761 | ||||||||||||||
Tranche 2D |
LIBOR+2.75% | 2024 | | 17,105 | | 4,179 | ||||||||||||||
Samay I (H) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Sumitomo /HSBC / Bank of Tokyo |
LIBOR+2.125% | 2021 | | 144,636 | | | ||||||||||||||
Colmito (I) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Banco Bice |
7.90% | 2028 | 622 | 19,176 | | |
F-66
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
A. Composition (contd)
As at
|
As at
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Nominal annual |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate |
Maturity |
Current |
Non-Current |
Current |
Non-Current |
|||||||||||||||||
Empresa Energética Corinto, Ltd. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Banco de América Central (BAC) |
8.35% | 2018 | 2,634 | 9,392 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Tipitapa Power Company, Ltd. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Banco de América Central (BAC) |
8.35% | 2018/2019 | 1,951 | 5,781 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Consorcio Eólico Amayo, S.A. (J) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Banco Centroamericano de Integración Económica |
8.45%-
LIBOR+4% |
2023 | 4,533 | 47,147 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Consorcio Eólico Amayo (Fase II), S.A. (K) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Various entities |
LIBOR+5.75%,
8.53%,10.76% |
2025 | 2,838 | 34,209 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Jamaica Private Power Company |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Royal Bank of Canada |
LIBOR + 5.50% | 2017 | 2,983 | 3,990 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Burmeister & Wain Scandinavian Contractor A/S |
3.59% | 2018 | 315 | 897 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Surpetroil S.A.S. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Banco Corpbanca Colombia S.A. |
DTF + 3.9% | 2015 | 135 | | | | ||||||||||||||||
PQP (L) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Banco Industrial |
LIBOR + 4.50% | 2019 | 4,757 | 17,034 | | | ||||||||||||||||
OPC Rotem Ltd |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Lenders Consortium (M) |
4.85% - 5.36% | 2031 | 18,818 | 381,246 | 19,459 | 448,681 | ||||||||||||||||
Dalkia Israel Ltd. (N) |
2017 | | 19,060 | | 19,012 | |||||||||||||||||
IC Power Israel Ltd (O) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Facility AAmitim and Menora Pension Funds |
4.85%/7.75% | 2017 | | 39,902 | | |||||||||||||||||
Facility BAmitim and Menora Pension Funds |
7.75% | 2029 | | 53,203 | | |||||||||||||||||
IC Power Ltd |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Bank Hapoalim New York |
1.25% | 2016 | | 12,003 | | | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub total |
56,757 | 1,335,548 | 36,949 | 696,991 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Liabilities in respect of finance leases: Kallpa Generación |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Banco de Crédito del Perú/ Citibank (P) |
LIBOR+3.00% | 2016 | 8,901 | 2,335 | 8,242 | 11,235 | ||||||||||||||||
Banco de Crédito del Perú (Q) |
LIBOR+2.05% | 2017 | 6,473 | 28,667 | 6,399 | 35,141 | ||||||||||||||||
Scotiabank Perú (R) |
7.57% | 2018 | 7,140 | 37,755 | 7,065 | 44,895 | ||||||||||||||||
Banco de Crédito del Perú (S) |
7.15% | 2023 | 6,624 | 94,440 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Surpetroil S.A.S. |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Banco de Occidente S.A. |
DTF + 3.5% | 2017 | 444 | 759 | | | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
29,582 | 163,956 | 21,706 | 91,271 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Sub total |
86,339 | 1,499,504 | 58,655 | 788,262 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-67
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
A. Composition (contd)
As at December 31,2014 |
As at December 31,2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Nominal annual |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate |
Maturity |
Current |
Non-Current |
Current |
Non-Current |
|||||||||||||||
Debentures |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cobee |
||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds Cobee II (T) |
9.40% | 2015 | 6,803 | | 6,800 | 6,803 | ||||||||||||||
Bonds Cobee III-1A (U) |
5.00% | 2014 | | | 4,000 | | ||||||||||||||
Bonds Cobee III-1B (U) |
6.50% | 2017 | | 3,500 | | 3,500 | ||||||||||||||
Bonds Cobee III-1C (bolivianos) (U) |
9.00% | 2020 | | 6,343 | | 6,344 | ||||||||||||||
Bonds Cobee III-2 (U) |
6.75% | 2017 | | 5,000 | | 5,000 | ||||||||||||||
Bonds Cobee III-3 (U) |
7.00% | 2022 | | 6,160 | | 6,160 | ||||||||||||||
Bonds Cobee IV-1A (V) |
6.00% | 2018 | | 3,967 | | | ||||||||||||||
Bonds Cobee IV-1B (V) |
7.00% | 2020 | | 3,964 | | | ||||||||||||||
Bonds Cobee IV-1C (V) |
7.80% | 2024 | | 12,020 | | | ||||||||||||||
Cobee Bonds-IV Issuance 3 (V) |
6.70% | 2019 | | 4,950 | | | ||||||||||||||
Cobee Bonds-IV Issuance 4 (V) |
7.80% | 2024 | | 15,029 | | | ||||||||||||||
Kallpa Generación |
||||||||||||||||||||
Kallpa Bonds (W) |
8.50% | 2022 | 10,207 | 149,105 | 6,768 | 159,311 | ||||||||||||||
Inkia Energy Ltd |
||||||||||||||||||||
Inkia Bonds (X) |
8.375% | 2021 | | 447,357 | | 447,014 | ||||||||||||||
Cepp |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cepp Bonds (Y) |
6.00-7.75% | 2014/2019 | | 24,755 | 15,000 | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
17,010 | 682,150 | 32,568 | 634,132 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Cobee |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cobee Bonds (Premium) |
2014-2024 | | 4,792 | 16 | 3,008 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Subtotal |
17,010 | 686,942 | 32,584 | 637,140 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
161,486 | 2,186,446 | 243,763 | 1,425,402 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DTF: | Depósitos a Término Fijo . Fixed-term deposits rate calculated by Colombias Central Bank. |
TRE: | Tasa de Referencia . Weighted average for time deposits rates, calculated by Bolivias Central Bank. |
F-68
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
B. | Classified by currency and interest rates |
Weighted
|
As at December 31 |
|||||||||||
2014 |
2014 |
2013 |
||||||||||
% |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Short-term loans from banks |
||||||||||||
In dollars |
4.43 | % | 15,000 | 147,822 | ||||||||
Other |
2.59 | % | 43,137 | 4,702 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
58,137 | 152,524 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non-current liabilities (including current maturities) |
||||||||||||
Debentures: |
||||||||||||
In dollars |
8.17 | % | 661,200 | 655,104 | ||||||||
In other currencies |
6.12 | % | 42,752 | 14,620 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
703,952 | 669,724 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Loans from banks: |
||||||||||||
In dollars |
5.10 | % | 860,145 | 246,483 | ||||||||
In Shekels (*) |
5.69 | % | 493,169 | 468,140 | ||||||||
In other currencies |
7.87 | % | 19,931 | 305 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
1,373,245 | 714,928 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
2,077,197 | 1,384,652 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
(*) | Does not include Dalkia |
C. | Liability in respect of financing lease |
Information regarding the financing lease liability broken down by payment dates is presented below:
As at December 31, 2014 |
As at December 31, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum
lease rentals |
Interest
|
Present
value of
rentals |
Minimum future lease rentals |
Interest
|
Present
value of
rentals |
|||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | |||||||||||||||||||
Less than one year |
40,722 | 11,140 | 29,582 | 26,747 | 5,041 | 21,706 | ||||||||||||||||||
From one year to five years |
153,396 | 33,122 | 120,274 | 101,063 | 9,792 | 91,271 | ||||||||||||||||||
More than five years |
48,725 | 5,043 | 43,682 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
242,843 | 49,305 | 193,538 | 127,810 | 14,833 | 112,977 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-69
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
Short-term loans from banks
D. | Credit Suisse On December 20, 2013, Inkia Holdings Acter, together with certain of its subsidiaries, executed a one-year secured credit agreement with Credit Suisse AG in an aggregate principal amount of US$ 125,000 thousand. The loan under this facility bears interest on a quarterly basis at LIBOR plus a margin of 4% per annum and was secured with the shares of certain of Inkias subsidiaries: Latin America Holding I, Ltd., Latin America Holding II, Ltd. and Southern Cone Power Ltd. |
As of December 31, 2013, the outstanding balance under this facility was US$ 125,000 thousand. (US$ 122,073 thousand net of transaction costs). In August 2014, in connection with Inkias recent sale of its indirect equity interest in Edegel, Inkia repaid US$ 126,028 thousand to Credit Suisse, representing the aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding under this facility, plus accrued interest.
Long term loans from banks and others
E. | Kallpa Syndicated LoanIn November 2009, Kallpa entered into a secured credit agreement in the aggregate amount of US$ 105,000 thousand to finance capital expenditures related to Kallpas combined-cycle plant. The loans under this credit agreement are secured by Kallpas combined-cycle plant substantially all of Kallpas other assets, including Kallpas revenues under its PPAs. The loan under this credit agreement bear interest payable monthly in arrears at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin of 5.50% per annum through November 2012, 5.75% per annum from November 2012 through November 2015 and 6.00% from November 2015 through maturity in October 2019. Scheduled amortizations of principal are payable monthly commening in February 2013 through maturity in October 2019. As of December 31, 2014, the outstanding principal amount under this credit agreement was US$ 72,558 thousand. |
F. | In connection with Inkia´s acquisition of Central Cardones in December 2011, Inkia consolidated the amounts outstanding under Central Cardones credit agreement entered with Banco de Crédito e Inversiones and Banco Itaú Chile. The loans under this credit agreement were issued in two tranches of US$ 37,296 thousand and US$ 20,884 thousand, respectively. Loans under the first tranche bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 1.9% per annum, and the principal of this tranche is payable in 20 semi-annual installments through maturity in August 2021. Loans under the second tranche bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum, interest is payable semi-annually, and the loan matures in February 2017. As of December 31, 2014, the outstanding principal amount under these loans was US$ 48,196 thousand. |
G. | In August 2012, CDA, as borrower, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as administrative agent, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as SACE agent, the Bank of Nova Scotia, as Offshore Collateral Agent, Scotiabank Peru, S.A.A., as onshore collateral agent, and certain financial institutions, as lenders, entered into a senior secured syndicated credit facility for an aggregate principal amount not to exceed US$ 591,000 thousand to finance the construction of CDAs project. Loans under this facility will be disbursed in three tranches. |
F-70
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
Long term loans from banks and others (contd)
The loans under this credit agreement are secured by CDAs power plant and related assets, comprise three tranches and bear interest payable on quarterly basis in arrears at a rate of LIBOR plus a margin. The margin applicable to each tranche is as follows:
Amount* |
From
|
From
|
From
|
From
|
||||||||||||||||
Tranche |
(US$) |
2017 |
2020 |
2023 |
2024 |
|||||||||||||||
A |
341,843 | 4.25 | % | 4.75 | % | 5.25 | % | 5.50 | % | |||||||||||
B |
184,070 | 4.25 | % | 5.00 | % | 5.75 | % | 6.25 | % | |||||||||||
D |
65,000 | 2.75 | % | 3.25 | % | 3.60 | % | 3.60 | % |
* | Up to |
Tranche A loans under this facility, in an aggregate principal amount of up to US$ 341,843 thousand, will initially bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 4.25% per annum, increasing over time beginning on the date after the interest payment date occurring after August 17, 2017 to LIBOR plus 5.50% per annum from the date after the interest payment date occurring after August 17, 2023 through maturity. Principal of the Tranche A loans will be payable in 33 quarterly installments commencing on the first quarterly payment date occurring after the project acceptance by CDA. Tranche A loans will be guaranteed by Corporación Financiera de Desarollo S.A. (COFIDE).
Tranche B loans under this facility, in an aggregate principal amount of up to US$184,070 thousand, will initially bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 4.25% per annum, increasing over time beginning on the date after the interest payment date occurring after August 17, 2017 to LIBOR plus 6.25% per annum from the date after the interest payment date occurring after August 17, 2023 through maturity. Principal of the Tranche B loans will be payable on August 17, 2024. Tranche B loans will be guaranteed by COFIDE.
Tranche D loans under this facility, in an aggregate principal amount of up to US$65,000 thousand, are divided in two parts: Tranche 1D, in an aggregate principal amount of up to US$42,250 thousand and Tranche 2D, in an aggregate principal amount of up to US$22,750 thousand. Both parts will initially bear interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum, increasing over time beginning on the date after the interest payment date occurring after August 17, 2017 to LIBOR plus 3.60% per annum from the date after the interest payment date occurring after August 17, 2023 through maturity. Principal of Tranche 1D and Tranche 2D will be payable in 33 and 12 quarterly installments, respectively. Tranche 1D payments will commence on the first quarterly payment date occurring after the project acceptance by CDA and Tranche 2D payments will commence 33 quarters after project acceptance by CDA. All Tranche D loans will be secured by a credit insurance policy provided by SACE S.p.A. Servizi Assicurativi del Commercio Estero, or SACE.
CDA received proceeds from these facilities in the aggregate amount of US$ 462,000 thousand (US$ 319,000 thousand and US$ 143,000 during 2014 and 2013, respectively). This amount is shown net of US$ 17,711 thousand of transaction costs.
F-71
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
Long term loans from banks and others (contd)
H. | In December 2014, Samay I S.A. signed a project finance credit agreement with: The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation and HSBC Bank in order to finance US$ 311,000 thousand, approximately 80% of the total cost of the project. This loan bears an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.125%. On December 18, 2014 Samay entered into an interest rate swap closing at a fixed interest rate of 0.794% for 40% of total notional and only during the construction period. During 2014, Samay received US$ 153,000 thousand under this facility. This amount is shown net of US$ 8,364 thousand of transaction costs. |
I. | In January 2014, Colmito Spa signed a credit agreement with Banco Bice in an aggregate amount of Chilean pesos 12,579,160 thousand (US$ 22,600 thousand). This loan bears an interest rate of 7.9% in Chilean pesos and is paid semiannually. In February 2014 Colmito entered into a cross currency swap closing at a fixed interest rate of 6.025% in U.S. Dollars. As of December 31, 2014, the outstanding principal amount under this loan was US$ 20,226 thousand. |
As of result of the business combinations described in note 4, Inkia assumed the following main long-term loans:
J. | Consorcio Eolico Amayo S.A. In October 2007, Amayo I entered into a 15 year US$ 71,250 thousand loan agreement with Banco Centroamericano de Integración Economica (CABEI). This loan is secured by a first degree mortgage over all the improvements executed on Amayo I´s project site, cessation of all the project contracts and the creation and maintenance of a reserve account for US$2,400 thousand, to be controlled by CABEI. Part of this loan (US$ 50,343 thousand) bears an interest rate of 8.45% and the other part (US$ 20,907 thousand) an interest rate of LIBOR+4%, and is payable in quarterly installments. |
K. | Consorcio Eolico Amayo (Fase II) S.A .In November 2010, Amayo II entered into a 15 year US$ 45,000 thousand loan agreement with Nederlandse Financierings-Maatschappij Voor Ontwikkelingslanden N.V (FMO) and Central American Bank for Economic Integration (CABEI). This syndicated loan is secured by a list of guarantees. These loans under this credit agreement bear interest rates of 10.76%, 8.53% and LIBOR+5.75%. All three loans are payable in quarterly installments. |
As of December 31, 2014, the outstanding principal amount with FMO, FMO (Mezzanine) and CABEI was US$ 26,081 thousand, US$ 2,370 thousand and US$ 8,596 thousand, respectively.
L. | Puerto Quetzal Power LLC In March 2012, Puerto Quetzal Power LLC (PQP) signed a loan agreement with seven financial institutions for an amount of US$ 35.0 million. The loan is payable in quarterly installments until September 2019. Interest is accrued at LIBOR plus 4.5% annually. PQP entered into an interest rate swap contract to fix its interest at a rate of 6.0% per annum. The loan is secured by a pledge of substantially all of the assets of PQP and Poliwatt Ltd (Poliwatt), including PQP and its subsidiaries shares. |
F-72
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
Long term loans from banks and others (contd)
M. | OPC Lenders Consortium |
In January 2011, OPC entered into a financing agreement with a consortium of lenders led by Bank Leumi LIsrael Ltd. for the financing of its power plant project. The financing consortium includes Bank Leumi and institutional entities from the following groups: Clal Insurance Company Ltd.; Amitim Senior Pension Funds; Phoenix Insurance Company Ltd.; and Harel Insurance Company Ltd (hereinafterOPCs lenders). As part of the financing agreement, the lenders committed to provide OPC a long-term credit facility (including a facility for variances in the construction costs), a working capital facility, and a facility for financing the debt service, in the overall amount of approximately NIS 1,800 million (approximately US$460 million). As part of the financing agreement, certain restrictions were provided with respect to distributions of dividends and repayments of shareholders loans, commencing from the third year after the completion of OPCs power plant. The loans are CPI linked and is repaid on a quarterly basis beginning in the fourth quarter of 2013 until 2031.
As part of the Facility Agreement, OPC is required to keep a Debt Service Reserve equivalent to the following two quarterly debt payments (hereinafter- the reserve) within the period of two years following power plant construction completion. As of December 31, 2014 the amount of the reserve is NIS 72,150 thousand (equivalent to US$ 18,552 thousand).
N. | Dalkia Israel Ltd. It corresponds to equity contributions made by Dalkia (OPC´s minority shareholder) and presented as a capital note. In July 2013, Dalkia paid the loan to the bank. |
The date of the repayment shall be no earlier than March 2017, bearing no interest or linkage differences. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013 the balance of the capital notes is NIS 71,649 thousands (US$ 19,060 thousand) and NIS 65,993 thousands (US$ 19,012 thousand), respectively.
O. | IC Power Israel Ltd. (ICPI) On June 22, 2014, ICPI entered into a mezzanine financing agreement with Mivtachim Social Insurance and Makefet Fund Pension (Amitim Pension Funds) and Menora Mivtachim Insurance Ltd in the aggregate amount of NIS 350,000 thousand (US$ 93,105 thousand), consisting of three Facilities: (i) Tranche A bridge loan for NIS 150,000 thousand, bearing interest of 4.85% p.a. to be repaid until March 31, 2017; (ii) Tranche B long-term loan for NIS 200,000 thousand, bearing interest of 7.75% p.a., repayable on annual basis until March 2029; and (iii) Tranche C (only to cover shortfall amounts) for NIS 350,000 thousand. As of December 31, 2014, no disbursements have been made under Tranche C. These loans are linked to CPI. |
Liabilities in respect of finance leases
P. |
Citibank Perú and Banco de Crédito del Perú In March 2006, Kallpa entered into a capital lease agreement with Citibank del Peru S.A., Citileasing S,A. and Banco de Credito del Perú under which the lessors provided financing for the construction of the Kallpa I facility at Chilca in an aggregate amount of US$ 56,000 thousand. Under the lease agreements, Kallpa will make monthly |
F-73
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
Liabilities in respect of finance leases (contd)
payments beginning in December 2007 until the expiry of the lease in March 2016. These leases are secured by the assets of Kallpa in Peru. As of December 31, 2014, the aggregate outstanding principal amount under this lease was US$ 11,236 thousand. The lease bears an interest rate of 90 day LIBOR plus 3.00%. Kallpa entered into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate, see note 17(a). |
Q. | Banco de Crédito del Perú In December 2007, Kallpa entered into a capital lease agreement with Banco de Credito del Perú under which the lessor provided financing for the construction of the Kallpa II turbine in an aggregate amount of US$ 81,500 thousand. Under the lease agreement, Kallpa will make monthly payments beginning in December 2009 until the expiry of the lease in December 2017. These leases are secured by the assets of Kallpa in Peru. As of December 31, 2014, the aggregate outstanding principal amount under this lease was US$ 35,140 thousand. The lease bears an interest rate of 90 day LIBOR plus 2.05%. Kallpa entered into an interest rate swap to fix the interest rate, see note 17(a). |
R. | Scotiabank In October 2008, Kallpa entered into a capital lease agreement with Scotiabank Peru under which the lessor provided financing for the construction of the Kallpa III turbine in an aggregate amount of US$ 88,000 thousand. Under the lease agreement, Kallpa will make monthly payments beginning in September 2010 until the expiry of the lease in July 2018. As of December 31, 2014, the aggregate outstanding principal amount under this lease was US$ 44,895 thousand. The lease bears a fixed interest rate of 7.57% p.a. |
S. | In April 2014, Kallpa entered into a capital lease agreement with Banco de Credito del Peru for US$ 107,688 thousand in order to finance the acquisition of the 193MW single turbine natural gas fired plant Las Flores from Duke Energy. Under the lease agreement, Kallpa will make quarterly payments beginning in July 2014 until the expiry of the lease in October 2023. The lease bears a fixed interest rate of 7.15% p.a. |
Debentures
T. | Bonds Cobee II In October 2008, COBEE issued and sold in the Bolivian market US$ 20,403 thousand aggregate principal amount of its 9.40% notes due 2015. Interest is escrowed monthly by the trustee and is paid semiannually. Principal on these notes is payable in three equal installments in 2013, 2014 and 2015. As of December 31, 2014, the aggregate outstanding principal amount under these bonds was US$ 6,803 thousand (US$ 13,603 thousand as of December 31, 2013). |
U. |
Bonds Cobee III In February 2010, COBEE approved a bond program under which it is permitted to offer bonds in aggregate principal amounts of up to US$ 40,000 thousand in multiple series. On March 12, 2010, COBEE issued and sold in the Bolivian market three series of notes in the aggregate principal amount of US$ 13,844 thousand. The aggregate gross proceeds of these notes, which were issued at a premium, were US$ 17,251 thousand. The Series A Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of US$ 4,000 thousand pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 5.00% per annum through maturity in February 2014. Principal on these notes is payable at maturity. The Series B |
F-74
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
Debentures (contd)
Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of US$ 3,500 thousand, pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 6.50% per annum through maturity in February 2017. Principal on these notes will be paid in two equal annual installments commencing in February 2016. The Series C Notes, in the principal amount of Bs.44.2 million (US$ 6,343 thousand), pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 9.00% per annum through maturity in January 2020. Principal on these notes will be paid in four equal annual installments commencing in February 2017. |
In April 2012, COBEE issued and sold two additional series of notes in the aggregate principal amount of US$ 11,160 thousand. The aggregate gross proceeds of these notes, which were issued at premium, were US$ 12,919 thousand. COBEE will amortize the premium reducing the interest expense related to these notes. The first series of these notes, in the aggregate of US$ 5,000 thousand pays interest semi-annually at the rate of 6.75% per annum through maturity in April 2017. Principal on these notes is payable at maturity. The second series of these notes in the aggregate principal amount of Bs.43 million (US$ 6,160 thousand), pays interest semi-annually at the rate of 7% per annum through maturity in February 2022. These funds were used mainly to pay a tranche of Bolivian bonds due in June 2012.
V. | Bonds Cobee IV In May 2013, COBEE approved a bond program under which COBEE is permitted to offer bonds in aggregate principal amount of up to US$ 60,000 thousand in multiple series. In February 2014, COBEE issued and sold three series of notes in the aggregate principal amount of US$ 19,934 thousand. The aggregate gross proceeds of these notes, which were issued at a premium, were US$ 20,617 thousand. The Series A Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of US$ 3,967 thousand pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 6.0% per annum through maturity in January 2018. The Series B Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of US$ 3,964 thousand pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 7.0% per annum through maturity in January 2020. The Series C Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of Bs.84 million (US$ 12,020 thousand) pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 7.8% per annum through maturity in January 2024. |
In November 2014, COBEE issued and sold two series of notes in the aggregate principal amount of US$ 20,086 thousand. The aggregate gross proceeds of these notes, which were issued at a premium, were US$ 22,100 thousand. The first series of these Notes, in the aggregate principal amount of US$ 4,950 thousand pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 6.70% per annum through maturity in October 2019. The second series of these notes in the aggregate principal amount of Bs.105 million (US$ 15,029 thousand) pay interest semi-annually at the rate of 7.80% per annum through maturity in October 2024.
W. |
Kallpa Bonds In November 2009, Kallpa issued US$ 172,000 thousand aggregate principal amount of its 8.5% Bonds due 2022. Holders of these bonds are required to make subscription payments under a defined payment schedule during the 21 months following the date of issue. Kallpa received proceeds of these bonds in the aggregate amount of US$ 18,920 thousand, US$ 36,120 thousand and US$ 116,960 thousand in 2009, 2010 and 2011, respectively. The proceeds of these bonds are being used for capital expenditures related to Kallpas combined-cycle plant. Interest on these bonds accrues based on the principal received by Kallpa and is payable quarterly. Principal amortization |
F-75
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
Debentures (contd)
payments under these bonds in amounts varying between 0.25% and 5.00% of the outstanding principal amount of these bonds commenced in May 2013 and will continue until maturity in May 2022. These bonds are secured by Kallpas combined-cycle plant and related assets. As of December 31, 2014, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of these bonds was US$ 159,312 thousand (US$ 166,079 thousand as of December 31, 2013). |
X. | Inkia Bonds On April 4, 2011, Inkia issued senior unsecured notes for an aggregate principal amount of US$ 300,000 thousand in the international capital market under the rule 144A Regulation S. These notes accrue interest at a rate of 8.375% and will be payable semi-annually with final maturity in April 2021 and were recognized initially at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. The proceeds from this issue were used mainly to finance Inkias equity contribution in the development of Cerro del Aguila Project and to repurchase all of the Inkia Bonds. |
On September 9, 2013, Inkia reopened its 8.375% senior notes due 2021 for an aggregate principal amount of US$ 150,000 thousand. The new notes have terms and conditions identical to the initial US$ 300,000 thousand notes issued on April 4, 2011 and were issued at 104.75% plus accrued interest from April 4, 2013, resulting in gross proceeds of US$ 157,125 thousand plus US$ 5,653 thousand of accrued interest. The proceeds from this issue will be used mainly for working capital and general corporate purposes. Subsequent to initial recognition, these notes are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. As of December 31, 2014, the outstanding principal amount under these notes was US$ 447,357 thousand (US$ 447,014 thousand as of December 31, 2013).
On September 5, 2014, Inkia requested the consents to its bondholders regarding certain proposed amendments to the Indenture: (i) Perform the IC split without being required to repurchase the bonds at a price equal to 101% of the aggregate principal; (ii) Request the repayment of the US$ 150,000 thousand Credit Suisse/IC Power/Inkia Loan from the net proceeds of the Edegel sale; and (iii) Extend the investment period of the net proceeds from the Edegel sale from 12 to 30 months.
On September 16, 2014, Inkia received the consents from holders of a majority of its outstanding US$450,000 thousand Senior Notes due 2021.
Y. | In December 2010, CEPP approved a program bond offering under which CEPP is permitted to offer bonds in aggregate principal amount of up to US$ 25,000 thousand in multiple series. In 2011 and 2010, CEPP issued and sold US$ 20,326 thousand and US$ 4,674 thousand of its 7.75% Bonds. CEPP used the proceeds of this offering to finance its continuing operations and repay intercompany debt. Interest on these bonds is payable monthly and principal of these bonds is due at maturity in May 2014. During the first quarter of 2014, CEPP issued and sold US$ 25,000 thousand of its 6.00% Bonds due in December 2018. Part of these funds was used to prepay US$ 15,000 thousand of its 7.75% Bonds outstanding due in May 2014. As of December 31, 2014, the outstanding principal amount net of transaction costs under these notes was US$ 24,755 thousand (US$ 15,000 thousand as of December 31, 2013). |
F-76
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 14Loans from banks and others (contd)
Debentures (contd)
Z. | As at December 31, 2014 and 2013, the main covenants that the Company and certain Group entities must comply with during the term of the debts are as follows: |
Covenant |
||||||||||||
Group entities |
Shareholder equity |
Debt service to coverage ratio |
Collateral ratio |
Minimum leverage |
Interest rate hedging |
|||||||
Kallpa Generación S.A. |
Not required | Not less than 1.20 | Not required | No more than 3.0 | Required | |||||||
COBEE (Bonds) |
Not required | >=1.2 | Not required | <=1.2 | Not required | |||||||
Central Cardones |
Not required | >=1.1 | Not required | Not required | Not required | |||||||
JPPC |
Not required | Not less than 1.10 | Not required | No more than 0.4 | Not required | |||||||
Amayo (Nicaragua) |
Not required | Not less than 1.25 | Not required | No more than 3.33 | Not required | |||||||
Corinto (Nicaragua) |
Not required | Not required | Not required | Not less than 3.25 until December 31, 2014, than 3.00 until December 31, 2015, than 2.50 until December 31, 2016 and 2.00 thereafter. | Not required | |||||||
Tipitapa (Nicaragua) |
Not required | Not required | Not required | Not less than 3.00 until December 31, 2014, than 2.75 until December 31, 2015 and 2.00 thereafter. | Not required | |||||||
OPC Rotem |
Not required | >=1.1 and >=1.25 for dividend distribution (including a lock-up period of 3 years) | Not required | Not required | Not required |
Other than with respect to the covenants referred to above, and the restrictions set forth in Note 20, there are no significant restrictions on the ability of the Companys subsidiaries to repay loans or advances or to transfer funds to the Company. Compliance with the covenants referred to above is overseen by the Groups Management. As at December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company and its subsidiaries have complied with these financial covenants.
Note: Inkia has to comply only with incurrence ratios when it plans to issue new debt.
Other than with respect to OPC (which declares dividends in New Israeli Shekels) and Surpetroil (which declares dividends in Colombian pesos) each of our subsidiaries declares dividends in our reporting currency, the US Dollar.
F-77
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 15Loans and capital notes from parent company
On May 29, 2014, Inkia paid US$ 167,811 thousand of the full outstanding amount of the loans owed to the Parent Company.
On June 29, 2014, IC Power paid US$ 94,865 thousand of the full outstanding amount of the loans owed to Israel Corporation (IC). As a result of this payment, the Group recorded a finance expense of US$ 12,602 thousand arising from the difference between the nominal value and the book value of the capital notes.
On August 26, 2014, IC Power received a short-term loan from IC in an amount of US$125,000 thousand to repay the Acter Debt, see note 5. This loan was repaid on September 22, 2014.
Note 16Trade payables
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Open accounts |
143,621 | 91,467 | ||||||
Checks payable |
18 | 84 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
143,639 | 91,551 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
Note 17Other payables and long term liabilities, including derivative instruments
As at December 31, 2014 |
As at December 31, 2013 |
|||||||||||||||
Current |
Non-current |
Current |
Non-current |
|||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||||||||
Financial instruments not used for hedging (a) |
1,318 | 2,798 | 1,428 | 3,006 | ||||||||||||
Financial instruments used for hedging (a) |
14,868 | 18,247 | 15,302 | 6,915 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
16,186 | 21,045 | 16,730 | 9,921 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Loans and capital notes from parent company |
592 | | | | ||||||||||||
Employees and payroll-related agencies |
3,402 | | 1,460 | | ||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
15,589 | | 4,125 | | ||||||||||||
Government agencies |
4,527 | | 2,598 | | ||||||||||||
Interests payable |
17,259 | | 13,626 | | ||||||||||||
Share appreciation rights liability (b) |
1,396 | | 10,298 | 1,749 | ||||||||||||
Employee Benefits |
| 6,194 | | 3,714 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income |
1,526 | 2,936 | 1,758 | 4,462 | ||||||||||||
Dismantling liability |
| 10,072 | | 5,528 | ||||||||||||
Consideration retained related to Surpetroil acquisition |
6,000 | | | | ||||||||||||
Other (c) |
46,203 | 4,780 | 28,755 | 6,714 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
96,494 | 23,982 | 62,620 | 22,167 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
112,680 | 45,027 | 79,350 | 32,088 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-78
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 17Other Payables and Long term liabilities, including Derivative Instruments (contd)
(a) As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the derivatives maintained by the Group are as follow:
In thousands of US$ |
||||||||||||
Notional amount |
Fair value |
|||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||
Hedge derivatives (i) |
||||||||||||
Interest rate swap (a) |
67,500 | (607 | ) | (2,250 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate swap (b) |
384,093 | (23,514 | ) | (5,759 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate swap (c) |
100,683 | (718 | ) | (858 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate swap (d) |
124,400 | (351 | ) | | ||||||||
Interest rate swap (e) |
15,553 | (2,523 | ) | | ||||||||
Exchange rate swap (f) |
158,270 | (5,402 | ) | (13,105 | ) | |||||||
Exchange rate forward (g) |
4,675 | | (245 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(33,115 | ) | (22,217 | ) | |||||||||
Trading derivatives (ii) |
||||||||||||
Interest rate swap (h) |
42,000 | (3,769 | ) | (4,427 | ) | |||||||
Interest rate swap (i) |
14,500 | (29 | ) | | ||||||||
Interest rate swap (j) |
8,443 | (318 | ) | | ||||||||
Exchange rate forward (k) |
380 | | (7 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(37,231 | ) | (26,651 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
(i) | Hedge derivatives |
Entity |
Financing |
Underlying item |
Description |
Fixed rate |
Expiration |
|||||||
(a) |
Kallpa | Kallpa II lease | Libor plus 2.05% | 83% Kallpa II debt | 6.55% | May 2015 | ||||||
(b) |
CDA | Syndicated | Libor plus 4.25% | 100% - Tranche A | 7.25-8.50% | Aug 2024 | ||||||
(c) |
CDA | Syndicated | Libor plus 4.25% | 50% - Tranche B | 5.38% | Nov 2015 | ||||||
(d) |
Samay I | Syndicated | Libor plus 2.125% | 40% total debt | 2.92% | Apr 2016 | ||||||
(e) |
Colmito | Loan | 7.90% in Chilean Pesos | 69% total debt | 6.025% in US$ | Jun 2028 | ||||||
(f) |
CDA | EPC payments in Nuevos Soles | Spot exchange rate in Nuevos Soles | S/403 million |
S/2.546 for
each US$1 |
Jan 2016 | ||||||
(g) |
OPC | LTSA with Mitsubishi Heavy Industries | Exposure to fluctuations | US$ 4,675 thousand | N.A. | Nov 2025 |
(ii) | The Group has additional interest swap agreements that are accounted for as trading derivatives because these derivatives were already in place when Inkia took control of the subsidiaries: |
Entity |
Financing |
Underlying item |
Description |
Fixed rate |
Expiration |
|||||||
(h) |
Cardones | Syndicated | Libor plus 1.9% | 100% - Tranche I | 4.90% | Aug 2021 | ||||||
(i) |
JPPC | Loan | Libor plus 5.5% | 71% | 6.46% | Mar 2017 | ||||||
(j) |
Amayo II | Syndicated | Libor plus 5.75% | 84% - BCIE facility | 8.31% | Dec 2019 | ||||||
Amayo II | Syndicated | Libor plus 5.75% | 49% - BCIE facility | 8.25% | Sep 2022 (*) | |||||||
(k) |
OPC | EPC with Daewoo International | Exposure to fluctuations | US$ 380 thousand | N.A. | Dec 2013 |
(*) | starts in Dec 2019 |
F-79
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 17Other Payables and Long term liabilities, including Derivative Instruments (contd)
(a) (contd)
The gain (loss) arising from the volatility of the fair value of these interest rate swaps is shown in the consolidated of profit or loss as Gain from derivative financial instruments. During 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Group recorded gains of US$ 133 thousand, US$ 2,879 thousand and US$ 893 thousand, respectively.
(b) On January 1, 2010, Inkia, through certain subsidiaries, established for a group of senior executives of Inkia and certain operating subsidiaries, a share appreciation rights plan (the Plan). The Plan was subject to varying vesting periods and a lock up period that matured on June 30, 2014. The Plan provides the economic benefit of up to 1.5% of the increase appreciation between the base price at the time of the grant date (US$ 1,809 per unit) and the resulting valuation at the settlement date (exercise date) of the Plan. The settlement (execution) price is based on the value resulting from multiplying eight times Inkias proportional EBITDA (earnings before income tax during the preceding four fiscal quarters) less proportional net financial liabilities (proportional debt with financial institutions including accrued interest net of cash and cash equivalents). By the end of December 31, 2013, Inkia had granted 3,689 units. During 2013 and 2014, 360 units and 3,329 units were exercised, respectively. During 2013 and 2014, US$560 thousand and US$10,298 thousand share rights appreciation payments were paid, respectively. The Plan was fully settled during 2014.
On December 27, 2011, OPC established for a group of its senior executives a share appreciation rights plan (the OPC Plan). The OPC Plan provides the economic benefit of up to 0.9% of the increase appreciation between the base price at the time of the grant date (US$194 per unit) and the resulting valuation at the settlement date (exercise date) of the OPC Plan. The OPC Plan is subject to a vesting period and a lockup period that matures on December 31, 2016. The settlement (execution) price is based on the value resulting from multiplying eight times OPCs EBITDA (earnings before income tax during the preceding four fiscal quarters) less net financial liabilities (debt with financial institutions including accrued interest net of cash, part of the restricted cash, and cash equivalents) and less US$120 million. By the end of December 2013, OPC had granted 3,600 units. During 2014, 2,293 units were exercised and US$ 2,486 thousand share rights appreciation payments were paid. As of December 31 , 2014, the liability in connection with the OPC Plan amounted to US$1,396 million. The OPC Plan was fully settled during 2015.
(c) It corresponds mainly to payables related to CDA and Puerto Bravo projects in the amount of US$29,697 thousand and US$16,173 thousand in 2014 and 2013 respectively.
Note 18Provisions
It corresponds mainly to a provision made by an IC Power´s subsidiary as a result of a regulator charge. Expenses related to this provision were recognized in the cost of sales in the amount of US$ 8,626 thousand and US$ 20,742 thousand in 2014 and 2013 respectively.
F-80
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 19Share Capital and Reserves
A. Share Capital and Premium
Ordinary shares |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Thousands of shares of NIS 0.01 par value | ||||||||
Issued and paid-up share capital as at December 31 |
10,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Authorized share capital |
10,000 | 10,000 |
Each ordinary share from the Corporations share capital has the right to dividends, to bonus shares and to distribution of the Corporations assets upon liquidation, in proportion to the par value of each share, without taking any premium paid in respect thereof, all subject to the Corporations Articles of Association. Each of the shares entitles its holder to participate in the Corporations General Meetings and to one vote.
In accordance with the local laws that regulate the operations of the Groups operating entities, a reserve of up to a certain limit of their paid-in capital is required to be established through annual transfers of profit.
B. Translation reserve of foreign operations
The translation reserve includes all the foreign currency differences stemming from translation of financial statements of foreign activities.
C. Capital reserves
Capital reserves include mainly a hedge fund, which includes the effective part of the accrued net change in the fair value of instruments hedging the cash flows and that relate to hedged transactions not yet realized that have not yet been recorded on the statement of income.
D. Dividends
In 2014, the Company´s Board of Directors decided to pay dividends. The total dividend paid was US$ 37,324 thousand (US$3.73 thousand per ordinary share).
F-81
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 20 - Non-controlling interest
The following tables summarize the information relating to each of IC Powers subsidiaries that has non-controlling interest.
2014 In thousands of US$ |
Kallpa
|
Cerro del
|
Samay I S.A. |
Nejapa
|
Nicaragua
|
OPC
|
Others. |
Intra-group
|
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NCI percentage |
25.10 | % | 25.10 | % | 25.10 | % | 29.00 | % | 35.42 | % | 20.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
83,954 | 128,242 | 138,153 | 46,395 | 52,850 | 230,775 | 70,515 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
645,927 | 662,055 | 102,668 | 19,872 | 172,240 | 487,598 | 281,683 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
(153,302 | ) | (25,138 | ) | (18,713 | ) | (9,179 | ) | (23,376 | ) | (118,847 | ) | (35,072 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
(405,360 | ) | (460,081 | ) | (144,679 | ) | (639 | ) | (131,327 | ) | (507,635 | ) | (206,572 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets |
171,219 | 305,078 | 77,429 | 56,449 | 70,387 | 91,891 | 110,554 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Carrying amount of NCI |
42,976 | 76,575 | 19,435 | 16,370 | 24,931 | 18,378 | 13,259 | 3,400 | 215,324 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
436,673 | | | 131,396 | 124,578 | 413,578 | 111,644 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit |
53,090 | 6,964 | (311 | ) | 3,502 | 4,472 | 71,045 | 11,687 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
OCI |
1,150 | (6,938 | ) | (245 | ) | | | (9,041 | ) | (1,995 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Profit attributable to NCI |
13,326 | 1,748 | (78 | ) | 1,016 | 1,584 | 14,209 | 860 | (448 | ) | 32,217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
OCI attributable to NCI |
289 | (1,742 | ) | (62 | ) | | | (1,809 | ) | (798 | ) | 25 | (4,097 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow Operating activities |
116,915 | | | 6,621 | 16,605 | 187,768 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investing activities |
(26,259 | ) | (247,724 | ) | (88,644 | ) | (567 | ) | 19,522 | (48,515 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing activities |
(78,982 | ) | 296,868 | 195,135 | (38 | ) | (20,445 | ) | (29,295 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of changes in the exchange rate |
(824 | ) | | (265 | ) | | 411 | (14,914 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash equivalents |
10,850 | 49,144 | 106,226 | 6,016 | 16,093 | 95,044 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Includes Empresa Energética Corinto, Tipitapa Power Company, Centrans Energy Holdings (Amayo) and Arctas Amayo (Fase II). |
F-82
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 20 - Non-controlling interest (contd)
The following tables summarize the information relating to each of IC Powers subsidiaries that has non-controlling interest.
2013 US$ thousands |
Kallpa
|
Cerro del
|
Nejapa Holdings
|
OPC Rotem Ltd. |
Others |
Intra-group
|
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||
NCI percentage |
25.10 | % | 25.10 | % | 29.00 | % | 20.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
71,948 | 72,670 | 44,455 | 108,698 | 56,402 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
541,079 | 378,012 | 23,827 | 557,672 | 138,972 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
(113,532 | ) | (30,767 | ) | (14,352 | ) | (80,372 | ) | (51,441 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
(352,515 | ) | (114,864 | ) | (983 | ) | (556,296 | ) | (67,304 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net assets |
146,980 | 305,051 | 52,947 | 29,702 | 76,629 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying amount of NCI |
36,892 | 76,568 | 15,355 | 5,940 | 7,005 | 3,846 | 145,606 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Revenues |
394,055 | | 134,919 | 187,397 | 102,247 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit |
43,665 | 264 | 5,349 | 6,502 | 14,279 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
OCI |
1,396 | (13,805 | ) | | 1,474 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Profit attributable to NCI |
10,960 | 66 | 1,551 | 1,300 | 670 | 163 | 14,710 | |||||||||||||||||||||
OCI attributable to NCI |
360 | (3,465 | ) | | 294 | | | (2,821 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities |
142,495 | | 17,468 | 46,526 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow from investing activities |
(16,566 | ) | (178,664 | ) | (2,670 | ) | 7,507 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow from financing activities |
(158,309 | ) | 235,090 | (14,393 | ) | 5,201 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of changes in the exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents |
(1,245 | ) | | | 3,322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrese) in cash equivalents |
(33,625 | ) | 56,426 | 405 | 62,555 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-83
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 20 - Non-controlling interest (contd)
The following tables summarize the information relating to each of IC Powers subsidiaries that has non-controlling interest.
2012 US$ thousands |
Kallpa
|
Cerro del
|
Nejapa Holdings
|
OPC Rotem Ltd. |
Others |
Intra-group
|
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||
NCI percentage |
25.10 | % | 25.10 | % | 29.00 | % | 20.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
109,750 | 9,176 | 45,056 | 64,302 | 48,229 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
557,136 | 221,225 | 26,497 | 451,751 | 128,721 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
(80,881 | ) | (21,754 | ) | (23,121 | ) | (8,103 | ) | (25,093 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
(391,308 | ) | (20 | ) | (833 | ) | (488,948 | ) | (89,506 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net assets |
194,697 | 208,627 | 47,599 | 19,002 | 62,351 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Carrying amount of NCI |
48,869 | 52,365 | 13,804 | 3,800 | 6,335 | 3,662 | 128,835 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Revenues |
276,341 | | 144,816 | | 102,304 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit |
34,798 | 374 | 7,720 | (5,867 | ) | 13,928 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
OCI |
| | | (1,325 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Profit attributable to NCI |
8,734 | 94 | 2,239 | (1,174 | ) | 626 | (1,074 | ) | 9,445 | |||||||||||||||||||
OCI attributable to NCI |
| | | (265 | ) | | | (265 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Cash flow from operating activities |
54,534 | | 8,421 | 22,702 | 15,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow from investing activities |
(41,257 | ) | (166,904 | ) | (2,441 | ) | (137,142 | ) | (7,075 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow from financing activities |
16,792 | 166,649 | (11,640 | ) | 114,401 | (19,254 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of changes in the exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents |
1,080 | | | 102 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net increase (decrese) in cash equivalents |
31,149 | (255 | ) | (5,660 | ) | 63 | (11,147 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-84
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 20Non-controlling interest (contd)
Restrictions on assets and liabilities
Inkia´s subsidiaries have no restrictions to transfer cash or other assets to the parent company as long as each subsidiary is in compliance with the covenants derived from the borrowing agreements described in note 14.
OPC has restrictions to transfer cash or paid dividends up to the third anniversary of Construction Completion. As of December 31, 2013 and 2014, the cash and cash equivalents at OPC´s financial statements amounted to US$ 62,624 thousands and US$ 157,668 thousands respectively.
Inkia has restrictions to transfer cash or other assets to the parent company. Pursuant to its senior notes agreement, dividend payments are treated as restricted payments and are subject to mainly the following conditions:
| Inkia is able to incur at least US$1.00 of additional indebtedness pursuant to the incurrence covenant test (unconsolidated interest coverage ratio is equal or greater than 2.0 to 1.0); and |
| The amount (dividend payments) cannot exceed the sum of: 100% of cumulative consolidated net income of the company accrued on a cumulative basis, beginning on January 1, 2011 to the end of the most recent fiscal quarter for which financial statements have been provided to the Trustee, deducting any non-cash charges or expense (other than depreciation and amortization), non-cash gains and the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles. |
Note 21Cost of sales
For the year ended December 31 |
||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Payroll and related expenses |
31,369 | 22,301 | 16,486 | |||||||||
Transmission costs |
126,195 | 85,533 | 44,377 | |||||||||
Capacity and energy purchases |
204,266 | 137,135 | 48,491 | |||||||||
Fuel, gas and lubricants |
504,162 | 286,484 | 253,213 | |||||||||
Other |
70,730 | 62,349 | 32,966 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
936,722 | 593,802 | 395,533 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 22General and administrative expenses
For the year ended December 31 |
||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Payroll and related expenses |
28,431 | 20,010 | 15,992 | |||||||||
Bad and doubtful debts |
628 | | 131 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
7,417 | 3,943 | 3,853 | |||||||||
Legal fees |
11,118 | 3,205 | 2,594 | |||||||||
Deferred compensation |
2,541 | 3,763 | 2,978 | |||||||||
Consultant and professional services |
7,957 | 3,465 | 5,212 | |||||||||
Third party services |
3,737 | 2,627 | 2,476 | |||||||||
Community goodwill |
1,795 | 704 | 366 | |||||||||
Other expenses |
5,049 | 3,463 | 3,107 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
68,673 | 41,180 | 36,709 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-85
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 23Other income
For the year ended December 31 |
||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands | US$ thousands | US$ thousands | ||||||||||
Other income |
||||||||||||
Insurance claims (a) |
7,452 | | | |||||||||
Capital gain on sale of property, plant and equipment, net |
| 43 | 980 | |||||||||
Dividend incomes from other companies (b) |
3,655 | 623 | 1,401 | |||||||||
EPC constructor compensation (c) |
1,990 | | | |||||||||
Other |
3,786 | 3,574 | 4,474 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
16,883 | 4,240 | 6,855 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Corresponds mainly to Consorcio Eolico Amayo (Fase II) claim in relation to three wind towers damaged. |
(b) | In 2014, it corresponds to dividends received from Edegel/ Generandes post-sale. |
(c) | Combined cycle compensation by POSCO Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. due to valves acquisition and water consumption. |
Note 24Financing income and expenses
For the year ended December 31 |
||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Financing income |
||||||||||||
Interest income from bank deposits |
(1,827 | ) | (438 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||||
Net income from change in exchange rates |
(2,007 | ) | | (2,247 | ) | |||||||
Net change in fair value of derivative financial instruments |
(133 | ) | (2,645 | ) | | |||||||
Interest on commercial operations |
(2,170 | ) | (2,460 | ) | (2,774 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financing income recorded on the statement of income |
(6,137 | ) | (5,543 | ) | (5,092 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financing expenses |
||||||||||||
Interest expenses to banks and others |
101,942 | 68,132 | 37,797 | |||||||||
Interest expense on loans from parent company |
6,971 | 11,273 | 7,582 | |||||||||
Finance expenses on IC capital settlement |
12,602 | | | |||||||||
Consent fee |
1,012 | | | |||||||||
Net expenses from change in exchange rates |
| 4,460 | | |||||||||
Net change in fair value of derivative financial |
| | 3,097 | |||||||||
Other expenses |
2,972 | 1,829 | 872 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financing expenses recorded on the statement of income |
125,499 | 85,694 | 49,348 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net financing expenses (income) recorded on the statement of income |
119,362 | 80,151 | 44,256 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-86
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 25Taxes on Income
A. Taxes on income included in the income statements:
For the year ended December 31 |
||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Continuing operations |
||||||||||||
Current taxes on income |
45,421 | 34,845 | 14,070 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income from deferred taxes |
4,901 | 5,848 | 5,883 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
50,322 | 40,693 | 19,953 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2014, US$1,518 thousand of previously unrecognized tax losses was used to reduce our current tax expense in Israel. No previously unrecognized tax benefits were used in 2013 or 2012 to reduce our current tax expense.
No previously unrecognized tax benefits were used in 2014, 2013 or 2012 to reduce our deferred tax expense.
B. Reconciliation between the theoretical tax on the pre-tax income and the tax expenses
For the year ended December 31 |
||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Income before taxes on income |
190,765 | 93,391 | 57,295 | |||||||||
Statutory tax rate |
26.5 | % | 25 | % | 25 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Tax computed at the principal tax rate applicable to the Corporation |
50,553 | 23,348 | 14,324 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in tax in respect of: |
||||||||||||
Corporations share in profits of associated companies |
(5,776 | ) | (4,062 | ) | (3,951 | ) | ||||||
Exempt income |
(21,145 | ) | (422 | ) | (1,725 | ) | ||||||
Income subject to tax at a different tax rate |
12,846 | 8,023 | 5,773 | |||||||||
Non-deductible expenses |
8,506 | 8,522 | 8,491 | |||||||||
Tax losses and other tax benefits for the period regarding which deferred taxes were not created |
290 | 80 | 216 | |||||||||
Utilization of losses and benefits from prior years for which deferred taxes were not created |
(1,518 | ) | | | ||||||||
Taxes in respect of foreign dividend |
8,047 | | | |||||||||
Taxes in respect of prior years |
| 61 | 69 | |||||||||
Impact of change in tax rate |
(3,131 | ) | 50 | | ||||||||
Other differences |
1,650 | 5,093 | (3,244 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Taxes on income included in the statement of income |
50,322 | 40,693 | 19,953 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Permanent items mainly correspond to adjustments for transfer pricing and translation results of the tax basis in foreign currency related to the operations in Peru and Bolivia.
F-87
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 25Taxes on Income (contd)
C. Deferred tax assets and liabilities (contd)
C. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
1. Deferred tax assets and liabilities recognized
The deferred taxes in respect of companies in Israel are calculated based on the tax rate expected to apply at the time of the reversal as detailed above. Deferred taxes in respect of subsidiaries operating outside of Israel were calculated based on the tax rates relevant for each country.
The deferred tax assets and liabilities are allocated to the following items:
Property,
|
Employee
|
In respect of
|
Derivative
|
Controlling
|
Intangibles |
Other |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance as at |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
January 1, 2013 |
(65,104 | ) | 622 | 16,742 | 1,157 | (9,314 | ) | (2,885 | ) | 1,125 | (57,657 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in 2013: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions in respect of business combinations |
43 | | | | | | | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts recorded to equity reserve |
| | | 5,456 | (1,717 | ) | | 100 | 3,839 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation differences |
(324 | ) | 28 | 349 | | (725 | ) | | 5 | (667 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts recorded in income statement |
(14,132 | ) | 171 | 5,634 | 445 | 1,202 | 435 | 397 | (5,848 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31, 2013 |
(79,517 | ) | 821 | 22,725 | 7,058 | (10,554 | ) | (2,450 | ) | 1,627 | (60,290 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Changes in 2014: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification |
(5,276 | ) | | | | 5,276 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in respect of business combinations |
(35,243 | ) | 76 | 34 | | | (9,072 | ) | 1,991 | (42,214 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts recorded to equity reserve |
| | | 2,470 | | | (167 | ) | 2,303 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Translation differences |
4,576 | (46 | ) | 1,494 | (1 | ) | 24 | | (66 | ) | 2,993 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of change in tax rate |
(1,786 | ) | | 4,972 | | | (11 | ) | (44 | ) | 3,131 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amounts recorded in income statement |
(22,295 | ) | (27 | ) | 9,220 | (2,140 | ) | 4,829 | 1,173 | 1,207 | (8,033 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance as at December 31,2014 |
(139,541 | ) | 824 | 35,457 | 7,387 | (425 | ) | (10,360 | ) | 4,548 | (102,110 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-88
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 25Taxes on Income (contd)
C. Deferred tax assets and liabilities (contd)
2. The deferred taxes are presented in the statements of financial position as follows:
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Non-current assets |
42,609 | 25,645 | ||||||
Non-current liabilities |
(144,719 | ) | (85,935 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(102,110 | ) | (60,290 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
D. Taxation of companies in Israel
On August 5, 2013, the Knesset approved the Budget Law and the Law for Change of National Priorities (Legislative Changes for Achieving the Budget Targets for 2013 and 2014), 2013. As part of the legislation, the Company Tax rate was increased to 26.5% effective from January 1, 2014 (25% in 2013).
As defined in the Law for Encouragement of Industry, OPCs power station constitute an Industrial Enterprise upon fulfillment of the all the conditions provided by the Taxes Authority in Israel. Industrial Companies are entitled to benefits of which the most significant ones are as follows:
(a) Higher rates of depreciation.
(b) Amortization in three equal annual portions of issuance expenses when registering shares for trading as from the date the shares of the company were registered.
(c) An 8-year period of amortization for patents and know-how serving in the development of the enterprise.
(d) The possibility of submitting consolidated tax returns by companies in the same line of business.
E. Taxation of Non-Israeli Subsidiaries
Non-Israeli subsidiaries are assessed based on the tax laws in their resident countries. Withholding tax rates shown below are provided based on domestic legislation of relevant countries and may be decreased under tax treaties.
Current income tax from operations in El Salvador includes income tax from the consolidated subsidiaries of Nejapa Power Company Sucursal and Cenergica,. Income tax rate in El Salvador is 30% effectively as of January 1, 2012. In addition, a 5% to 25% withholding tax has been approved depending on whether the payments are to countries with preferential tax regimes or nil taxes.
F-89
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 25Taxes on Income (contd)
E. Taxation of Non-Israeli Subsidiaries (contd)
In the Dominic Republic, Compañía de Electricidad de Puerto Plata (CEPP) was tax exempt from the payment of all direct taxes, including income tax and withholding tax until April 2012, under the provisions of the National Development Incentives Law. Up to November 2012, the Dominican Statutory tax rate was 29% and the withholding tax rate was 25%. This withholding tax was applicable against future income taxes. From November 2012, the Dominican government introduced significant changes in the current tax regulations. As a result of this, income tax rate was set at 28% for 2014 (27% from 2015 thereafter) and withholding tax will be 10% with no credit against future taxes.
In Bolivia the company has 25% income tax and a 12.5% withholding tax on the Bolivian branch profits credited to the shareholder.
In December 2014, a tax reform Law was enacted in Peru. Among other changes, the Law decreases corporate income tax rates and increases withholding tax rates on dividends. The corporate income tax rate will reduce from 30% in 2014 to: 28%, in 2015 and 2016, to 27%, in 2017 and 2018 and to 26% starting 2019. The withholding tax rates will increase from 4.1% in 2014 to: 6.8% in 2015 and 2016, 8.0% in 2017 and 2018; and 9.3% starting 2019. Kallpa and CDA have signed tax stability agreements that expire in 2020 and 2022, respectively. Only after these tax agreements expire, Kallpa and CDA will be affected by the changes in income tax and withholding tax rates described above.
In September 2014, a tax reform in Chile was enacted, which makes substantial changes to the Chilean tax system, including two alternative methods for computing shareholder-level income taxation (attribution-basis and cash-basic methods), additional corporate tax rate increases, and other substantial modifications. As a result, the corporate income tax rate will increase gradually from 20% in 2013 to: 21% in 2014; 22.5% in 2015; 24% in 2016; and 25% in 2017 for shareholders on the attribution method, and 25.5% in 2017 for shareholders on the cash-basis method. Starting 2018 onwards, the income tax rate will be 25% for shareholders on the attribution method and 27% for shareholders on the cash-basis method. Dividends to a non-resident shareholder are subject to final withholding tax at the rate of 35%. The business income tax previously paid on the distributed profit is creditable against such withholding tax, so that effective tax on the distributed profit is 35%.
In Nicaragua, Empresa Energética Corinto and Tipitapa Power Company are subject to 25% income tax, based on a Foreign Investment Agreement signed in June 2000, which protect the companies from any unfavorable changes in the tax Law. In addition, Consorcio Eólico Amayo S.A and Consorcio Eólico Amayo Fase II, are tax exempt from income tax payments, in accordance with Law No.532 for Electric Power Generation with Renewable Sources Incentive, up to a period of seven years since the beginning of operations of the plants. . Dividends distribution are generally subject to final withholding tax at the rate of 10% (will increase to 15% from 2015) levied on 50% of gross amount.
In Guatemala, PQP is subject to a 28% income tax rate and a 5% withholding tax on dividend distributions. Income tax rate will reduce to 25% starting 2015.
In Colombia, Surpetroil and Surenergy are subject to a 34% income tax rate (25% income tax and a 9% income tax for equality). Dividends distributed by Colombian companies, paid from the profits that have been taxed at the corporate level, are not subject to taxes at shareholder´s level.
F-90
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 25Taxes on Income (contd)
E. Taxation of Non-Israeli Subsidiaries (cont´d)
Deferred tax liability on undistributed earnings
Subsidiaries pay dividends on quarterly basis as long as they are in compliance with the covenants derived from the borrowings agreements described in Note 14. Deferred tax is recognized for temporary differences related to investment in subsidiaries except where the Group is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is not probable that they will reverse it in the foreseeable future.
Distributions of the earnings of foreign subsidiaries are subject to the withholding taxes imposed by the foreign subsidiaries jurisdictions of incorporation. The Company does not have funds designated for, or subject to, permanent reinvestment in any country in which it operates.
Note 26 - Related and Interested Parties
Balances with interested and related parties
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Trade receivables |
19,347 | 21,706 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Sales |
208,457 | 96,075 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Parent company |
592 | 242,266 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Long-term interested party |
62,228 | 121,051 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Regarding the loan from the parent company see note 15.
The interest expenses recorded for the year ended December 31, 2014 in connection to loans payable to Parent company were approximately US$19,573 thousand (approximately US$14,504 thousand and US$ 13,175 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which were partly capitalized to property, plant and equipment).
IC Power executive officers do not receive compensation directly from IC Power; each is also an executive officer of Kallpa and receives compensation directly from Kallpa. The aggregate annual compensation expenses related to IC Power executive officers during 2014, 2013 and 2012 were US$ 3,479 thousand, US$ 5,540 thousand and US$2,990 thousand, respectively.
OPC recorded revenues from related parties in the amount of NIS 745,649 thousands (US$ 208,457 thousands) and NIS 346,830 thousands (US$ 96,075 thousands) in 2014 and 2013, respectively.
OPC recorded finance expenses from related parties in the amount of NIS 18,497 thousands (US$ 5,215 thousands) and NIS 15,266 thousands (US$ 4,229 thousands) in 2014 and 2013, respectively.
F-91
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 26Related and Interested Parties (contd)
A. Guarantees from related parties
Pursuant to the terms of the tender for the power plant construction, OPC provided a bank guarantee in favor of the Ministry of Infrastructures, in the amount of $1 million (approx. NIS 3.9 million), that was collateralized by Israel Corporation and Dalkia in accordance with their proportionate interests.
According to the PPA, on February 2014, the Company issued two guarantees in favor of IEC in the amount of NIS 52 million and NIS 48 million (linked to CPI). These guarantees were collateralized by IC Power and Dalkia in accordance with their proportionate interests. These guarantees replaced the previous guarantee in the amount of NIS 125 million as of December 31, 2013.
Note 27 Segment Information
A. Basis for segmentation
The Company is only involved in the power generation business. There is no other relevant activity or line of business identified. Therefore, senior management team evaluates the business from a geographic perspective. They receive and review the information about the operating results and assets performance as of subsidiary level as well as of country level.
Peru, Israel, Central America and Other are the reportable segments identified for IC Power consolidated financial statements. The geographic regions included in our Other segment are Bolivia, Chile, the Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Colombia and Panama.
F-92
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 27Segment Information (contd)
B. Information about reportable segments
For management purposes, the Group is organized into business units based on its geographic area, as follows:
Peru |
Israel |
Central
|
All other
|
Adjustments |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
436,673 | 413,578 | 307,618 | 214,361 | | 1,372,230 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(269,528 | ) | (253,077 | ) | (259,573 | ) | (154,544 | ) | | (936,722 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(44,853 | ) | (25,261 | ) | (17,881 | ) | (22,231 | ) | 9,230 | (100,996 | ) | |||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
122,292 | 135,240 | 30,164 | 37,586 | 9,230 | 334,512 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(17,302 | ) | (8,422 | ) | (8,956 | ) | (34,316 | ) | 323 | (68,673 | ) | |||||||||||||
Asset write-off |
| | | (34,673 | ) | | (34,673 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| | | 68,210 | | 68,210 | ||||||||||||||||||
Measurement to fair value of pre-existing share |
| | | 2,674 | | 2,674 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
3,224 | | 60 | 3,311 | (518 | ) | 6,077 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating income |
108,214 | 126,818 | 21,268 | (42,792 | ) | 9,035 | 308,127 | |||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(34,574 | ) | (30,571 | ) | (7,881 | ) | (45,751 | ) | (585 | ) | (119,362 | ) | ||||||||||||
Share in losses (income) of associated companies |
| | | 2,000 | | 2,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
73,640 | 96,247 | 13,387 | (959 | ) | 8,450 | 190,765 | |||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(16,812 | ) | (25,202 | ) | (4,759 | ) | (2,567 | ) | (982 | ) | (50,322 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
56,828 | 71,045 | 8,628 | (3,526 | ) | 7,468 | 140,443 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Segment assets |
1,755,641 | 718,373 | 451,782 | 1,159,793 | (236,711 | ) | 3,848,878 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in associated companies |
| | | 9,625 | | 9,625 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment liabilities |
1,209,031 | 626,482 | 273,879 | 739,921 | (21,363 | ) | 2,827,950 |
F-93
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 27Segment Information (contd)
B. Information about reportable segments (contd)
Peru |
Israel |
Central
|
All other
|
Adjustments |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
394,055 | 187,397 | 147,397 | 144,521 | | 873,370 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(238,610 | ) | (138,913 | ) | (127,208 | ) | (89,150 | ) | 79 | (593,802 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(39,501 | ) | (12,179 | ) | (9,252 | ) | (20,250 | ) | 9,555 | (71,627 | ) | |||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
115,944 | 36,305 | 10,937 | 35,121 | 9,634 | 207,941 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(16,910 | ) | (4,931 | ) | (3,831 | ) | (15,572 | ) | (64 | ) | (41,180 | ) | ||||||||||||
Gain on bargain purchase |
| | | 1,320 | | 1,320 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
1,463 | (584 | ) | 378 | 2,506 | (231 | ) | 3,532 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating income |
100,497 | 30,790 | 7,484 | 23,375 | 9,467 | 171,613 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(34,094 | ) | (21,915 | ) | (276 | ) | (23,232 | ) | (634 | ) | (80,151 | ) | ||||||||||||
Share in losses (income) of associated companies |
| | | 1,929 | | 1,929 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
66,403 | 8,875 | 7,208 | 2,072 | 8,833 | 93,391 | ||||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(24,647 | ) | (2,373 | ) | (2,205 | ) | (9,689 | ) | (1,779 | ) | (40,693 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
41,756 | 6,502 | 5,003 | (7,617 | ) | 7,054 | 52,698 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Segment assets |
1,087,743 | 666,370 | 86,865 | 1,224,025 | (315,905 | ) | 2,749,098 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in associated companies |
| | | 286,385 | | 286,385 | ||||||||||||||||||
Segment liabilities |
612,451 | 636,668 | 21,138 | 1,054,620 | (88,371 | ) | 2,236,506 |
F-94
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 27Segment Information (contd)
B. Information about reportable segments (contd)
Peru |
Israel |
Central
|
All other
|
Adjustments |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales |
276,341 | | 154,588 | 145,327 | | 576,256 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of Sales |
(176,593 | ) | | (131,585 | ) | (87,355 | ) | | (395,533 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
(31,661 | ) | | (9,189 | ) | (20,168 | ) | 9,592 | (51,426 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
68,087 | | 13,814 | 37,804 | 9,592 | 129,297 | ||||||||||||||||||
General, selling and administrative expenses |
(10,738 | ) | (3,651 | ) | (3,510 | ) | (18,953 | ) | 143 | (36,709 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other income, net |
1,839 | (218 | ) | 381 | 5,062 | (587 | ) | 6,477 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Operating income |
59,188 | (3,869 | ) | 10,685 | 23,913 | 9,148 | 99,065 | |||||||||||||||||
Financing expenses, net |
(17,560 | ) | (3,890 | ) | (185 | ) | (24,035 | ) | 1,414 | (44,256 | ) | |||||||||||||
Share in losses (income) of associated companies |
| | | 2,486 | | 2,486 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income before taxes from continuing operations |
41,628 | (7,759 | ) | 10,500 | 2,364 | 10,562 | 57,295 | |||||||||||||||||
Taxes on income |
(9,955 | ) | 1,891 | (3,050 | ) | (7,601 | ) | (1,238 | ) | (19,953 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations |
31,673 | (5,868 | ) | 7,450 | (5,237 | ) | 9,324 | 37,342 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Segment assets |
904,152 | 516,053 | 108,744 | 926,252 | (309,756 | ) | 2,145,445 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in associated companies |
| | | 311,541 | 311,541 | |||||||||||||||||||
Segment liabilities |
503,340 | 497,050 | 33,824 | 752,959 | (78,276 | ) | 1,708,897 |
C. Major customers
Revenues from Luz del Sur represented US$ 150,332 thousand of the total sales in 2013, and revenues from Cerro Verde and Edelnor represented US$ 62,624 thousand and US$ 57,372 thousand of the total sales in 2012, respectively. These revenues are attributable to the Peru segment.
F-95
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 28Earnings per share
Basic EPS amounts are calculated by dividing the profit for the year attributable to ordinary equity holders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year.
The following reflects the income and share data used in the EPS computations:
As at December 31 |
||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
||||||||||
Net income for continuing operations |
108,226 | 37,988 | 27,897 | |||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations |
128,055 | 28,427 | 29,116 | |||||||||
Net income for the year |
236,281 | 66,415 | 57,013 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Weighted average number of ordinary shares for basic EPS (in thousands) |
10,000 | 10,000 | 10,000 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Earnings per ordinary share from continuing operations |
10.8 | 3.8 | 2.8 | |||||||||
Earnings per ordinary share from discontinuing operations |
12.8 | 2.8 | 2.9 | |||||||||
Earnings per ordinary share |
23.6 | 6.6 | 5.7 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management
General
The Group has extensive international activity in which it is exposed to credit, liquidity and market risks (including currency, interest, inflation and other price risks). In order to reduce the exposure to these risks, the Group holds derivative financial instruments, (including forward transactions, SWAP transactions, and options) for the purpose of economic (not accounting) hedging of foreign currency risks, inflation risks, commodity price risks, interest risks and risks relating to the price of inputs. Furthermore, the Company holds derivative financial instruments to hedge its risk in respect of changes in the cash flows of issued bonds, and such instruments are accounting hedges.
This note presents information about the Groups exposure to each of the above risks, and the Groups objectives, policies and processes for measuring and managing the risk.
The risk management of the Group companies is executed by them as part of the ongoing current management of the companies. The Group companies monitor on a regular basis. The hedge policies with respect to all the different types of exposures are discussed by the boards of directors of the companies.
The comprehensive responsibility for establishing the base for the Groups risk management and for supervising its implementation lies with the Board of Directors and the senior management of the Group.
Credit risk
Counterparty credit risk is the risk that the financial benefits of contracts with a specific counterparty will be lost if a counterparty defaults on their obligations under the contract. This includes any cash
F-96
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
amounts owed to the Group by those counterparties, less any amounts owed to the counterparty by the Group where a legal right of set-offs exist and also includes the fair values of contracts with individual counterparties which are included in the financial statements. The maximum exposure to credit risk at each reporting date is the carrying value of each class of financial assets mentioned in this note.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not have sufficient funds to meet liabilities. The Group monitors its risk to shortage of funds through use of cash forecasts which identify the liquidity requirements of the Group. These are reviewed regularly to ensure sufficient financial headroom exists for at least a 6 month period.
Market risks
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, the CPI, interest rates and prices of capital products and instruments will affect the fair value of the future cash flows of a financial instrument.
Currency risk
The Group is exposed to currency risk in respect of assets and liabilities that are not denominated in dollars. A subsidiary of the Group, whose functional currency is the NIS, makes investments in fixed assets in various currencies (dollar, yen, NIS and euro). This company executes partial hedges against its functional currency.
Interest rate risk
The Group is exposed to changes in interest rates in respect of loans bearing variable interest rates and in respect of loans that the interest on them is determined as a margin from Government debentures.
The Group did not establish a policy for limiting the exposure and it hedges against this exposure according to forecasts of future interest rates. The Group enters into transactions mainly in order to reduce the cash flow risk in respect of interest rates and it takes a loan against a deposit in order to fix the interest rate.
Inflation risk
The Group has CPI-linked loans. The Group is exposed to high payments of interest and principal as the result of an increase in the CPI. It is noted that part of the Groups anticipated revenues will be linked to the CPI. The Group does not hedge this exposure beyond the expected hedge included in its revenues.
F-97
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
A. Credit risk
(1) Exposure to credit risk
The carrying amount of financial assets represents the maximum credit exposure. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date was:
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Carrying amount |
||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
583,296 | 516,804 | ||||||
Short term Deposits and restricted cash |
207,646 | 9,110 | ||||||
Trade receivables |
181,358 | 138,261 | ||||||
Other receivables |
47,427 | 19,176 | ||||||
Deposits and other long-term receivables including derivative instruments |
7,672 | 7,288 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,027,399 | 690,639 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
The maximum exposure to credit risk for trade receivables, at the reporting date by geographic region was:
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Carrying amount |
||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||
South America |
52,809 | 34,979 | ||||||
Israel |
41,260 | 43,529 | ||||||
Central America and Caribbean |
87,289 | 59,753 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
181,358 | 138,261 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(2) Aging of debts and impairment losses
The aging of trade receivables at the reporting date was:
As at December 31 |
As at December 31 |
|||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||||||
Gross |
Impairment |
Gross |
Impairment |
|||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
US$ thousands |
|||||||||||||
Not past due |
133,632 | (273 | ) | 111,411 | | |||||||||||
Past due to 3 months |
25,530 | (103 | ) | 23,297 | | |||||||||||
Past due 3 to 6 months |
12,385 | (55 | ) | 3,462 | | |||||||||||
Past due 6 to 9 months |
9,978 | (112 | ) | 33 | | |||||||||||
Past due 9 to 12 months |
25 | (12 | ) | 40 | | |||||||||||
Past due over 12 months |
567 | (204 | ) | 715 | (697 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
182,117 | (759 | ) | 138,958 | (697 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-98
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
A. Credit risk (contd)
(2) Aging of debts and impairment losses (contd)
The movement in the provision for impairment in respect of trade receivables during the year was as follows:
For the year ended December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
US$ thousands | US$ thousands | |||||||
Balance as at January 1 |
697 | 1,497 | ||||||
Impairment loss on trade receivables recognized in the period |
1,187 | | ||||||
Write off of customer receivables defined as uncollectible |
(566 | ) | | |||||
Cancellation of provision previously recognized |
(559 | ) | (800 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance as at December 31 |
759 | 697 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
B. Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter difficulty in meeting the obligations associated with its financial liabilities that are settled by delivering cash or another financial asset. The Companys approach to managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due, under both normal and stressed conditions, without incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Companys reputation.
The following are the contractual maturities of financial liabilities, including estimated interest payments:
Set forth below are the anticipated repayment dates of the financial liabilities, including an estimate of the interest payments. This disclosure does not include amounts regarding which there are offset agreements:
As at December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book
|
Projected
|
Up to
|
12
|
25
|
More
|
|||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-derivative financial liabilities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit from banks and others * |
58,137 | 58,646 | 58,646 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
143,639 | 143,639 | 143,639 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other payables and credit balances |
90,170 | 90,170 | 90,170 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-convertible debentures ** |
703,952 | 1,058,547 | 74,800 | 71,816 | 259,191 | 652,740 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans from banks and others ** |
1,392,305 | 1,969,288 | 134,568 | 141,343 | 520,034 | 1,173,342 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities in respect of financing lease |
193,538 | 242,842 | 40,722 | 35,529 | 89,425 | 77,166 |
F-99
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
B. Liquidity risk (contd)
As at December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book
|
Projected
|
Up to
|
12
|
25
|
More
|
|||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities hedging instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest SWAP contracts |
27,713 | 27,713 | 10,105 | 7,018 | 7,164 | 3,426 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forward contracts on exchange rate |
5,402 | 5,402 | 4,763 | 639 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities not for hedging |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest SWAP contracts and options |
4,116 | 4,116 | 1,318 | 985 | 1,390 | 424 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
2,618,972 | 3,600,363 | 558,731 | 257,330 | 877,205 | 1,907,098 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Not including current maturities. |
** | Including current maturities. |
As at December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book
|
Projected
|
Up to
|
12
|
25
|
More
|
|||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-derivative financial liabilities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit from banks and others * |
152,524 | 161,114 | 161,114 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
113,124 | 113,124 | 113,124 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other payables and credit balances |
46,902 | 46,902 | 46,902 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-convertible debentures ** |
669,724 | 1,055,700 | 88,083 | 70,561 | 181,432 | 715,624 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans from banks and others ** |
733,940 | 1,077,167 | 73,173 | 72,444 | 222,355 | 709,195 | ||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities in respect of financing lease |
112,977 | 127,810 | 26,747 | 26,612 | 74,451 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans and capital notes from the parent company |
242,266 | 253,478 | | | 88,826 | 164,652 | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities hedging instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest SWAP contracts |
8,867 | 8,867 | 6,386 | 8,835 | 5,347 | (11,701 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Forward contracts on exchange rate |
13,350 | 13,350 | 8,916 | 3,919 | 515 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities not for hedging |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest SWAP contracts and options |
4,427 | 4,427 | 1,421 | 1,226 | 1,623 | 157 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forward contracts on commodity prices |
7 | 7 | 7 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
2,098,108 | 2,861,946 | 525,873 | 183,597 | 574,549 | 1,577,927 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Not including current maturities. |
** | Including current maturities. |
F-100
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
B. Liquidity risk (contd)
The following tables indicate the periods in which the cash flows associated with derivatives that are cash flow hedges are expected to occur.
For the year ended December 31, 2014 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Book
|
Projected
|
Up to
|
12
|
25
|
More
|
|||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
27,713 | 27,713 | 10,105 | 7,018 | 7,164 | 3,426 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forward contracts on exchange rates |
5,402 | 5,402 | 4,763 | 639 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
33,115 | 33,115 | 14,868 | 7,657 | 7,164 | 3,426 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2013 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Book
|
Projected
|
Up to
|
12
|
25
|
More
|
|||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap contracts |
8,867 | 8,867 | 6,386 | 8,835 | 5,347 | (11,701 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Forward contracts on exchange rates |
13,350 | 13,350 | 8,916 | 3,919 | 515 | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
22,217 | 22,217 | 15,302 | 12,754 | 5,862 | (11,701 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. CPI and foreign currency risks
(1) Exposure to CPI and foreign currency risks
The Groups exposure to CPI and foreign currency risk, based on nominal amounts, is as follows:
As at December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dollar |
Foreign currency |
|||||||||||||||||||
Shekel |
Euro |
Other |
||||||||||||||||||
Unlinked |
CPI
|
|||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-derivative instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
384,514 | 157,940 | | 203 | 40,639 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term investments, deposits and loans |
172,500 | 30,124 | | | 5,022 | |||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
90,277 | 41,260 | | | 49,821 | |||||||||||||||
Other receivables and debit balances |
9,586 | 1,249 | | | 36,592 | |||||||||||||||
Deposits, loans and debit balances |
1,140 | | | | 6,210 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total financial assets |
658,017 | 230,573 | | 203 | 138,284 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-101
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
C. CPI and foreign currency risks (contd)
(1) Exposure to CPI and foreign currency risks (contd)
As at December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dollar |
Foreign currency |
|||||||||||||||||||
Shekel |
Euro |
Other |
||||||||||||||||||
Unlinked |
CPI
|
|||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||
Credit from banks and others * |
(15,000 | ) | | | | (43,137 | ) | |||||||||||||
Trade payables |
(62,026 | ) | (55,237 | ) | | | (26,376 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other payables and credit balances |
(56,985 | ) | (1,881 | ) | | (56 | ) | (31,248 | ) | |||||||||||
Long-term loans from banks and others and Debentures ** |
(1,713,683 | ) | (19,060 | ) | (493,168 | ) | | (63,884 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total financial liabilities |
(1,847,694 | ) | (76,178 | ) | (493,168 | ) | (56 | ) | (164,645 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total non-derivative financial instruments, net |
(1,189,677 | ) | 154,395 | (493,168 | ) | 147 | (26,361 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
(36,909 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net exposure |
(1,226,586 | ) | 154,395 | (493,168 | ) | 147 | (26,361 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Not including current maturities. |
** | Including current maturities. |
As at December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dollar |
Foreign currency |
|||||||||||||||||||
Shekel |
Euro |
Other |
||||||||||||||||||
Unlinked |
CPI
|
|||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||
Non-derivative instruments |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
394,244 | 102,760 | | | 19,800 | |||||||||||||||
Short-term investments, deposits and loans |
6,119 | 130 | | | 2,861 | |||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
66,497 | 43,529 | | | 28,235 | |||||||||||||||
Other receivables and debit balances |
2,832 | 135 | | | 16,210 | |||||||||||||||
Deposits, loans and debit balances |
2,084 | | | | 5,204 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total financial assets |
471,776 | 146,554 | | | 72,310 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Credit from banks and others * |
(147,822 | ) | | | | (4,702 | ) | |||||||||||||
Trade payables |
(39,543 | ) | (56,132 | ) | | (44 | ) | (17,405 | ) | |||||||||||
Other payables and credit balances |
(29,741 | ) | (860 | ) | | (7 | ) | (16,294 | ) | |||||||||||
Long-term loans from banks and others and Debentures ** |
(1,014,564 | ) | (19,012 | ) | (468,140 | ) | | (14,925 | ) |
F-102
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
C. CPI and foreign currency risks (contd)
(1) Exposure to CPI and foreign currency risks (contd)
As at December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Dollar |
Foreign currency |
|||||||||||||||||||
Shekel |
Euro |
Other |
||||||||||||||||||
Unlinked |
CPI
|
|||||||||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||||||
Loans and capital notes from the parent company |
(164,652 | ) | (77,614 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total financial liabilities |
(1,396,322 | ) | (153,618 | ) | (468,140 | ) | (51 | ) | (53,326 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total non-derivative financial instruments, net |
(924,546 | ) | (7,064 | ) | (468,140 | ) | (51 | ) | 18,984 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
(26,392 | ) | | | | 245 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net exposure |
(950,938 | ) | (7,064 | ) | (468,140 | ) | (51 | ) | 19,229 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* | Not including current maturities. |
** | Including current maturities. |
(2) Sensitivity analysis
A strengthening at the rate of 5%10% of the dollar exchange rate against the following currencies would have increased (decreased) the income or loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2013.
F-103
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
C. CPI and foreign currency risks (contd)
(2) Sensitivity analysis (contd)
Set forth below is a sensitivity analysis in connection with the Corporations foreign-currency derivative instruments as at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. A change in the exchange rates of the main currencies as at December 31, would have increased (decreased) the income or loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain constant.
As at December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||
10% increase |
5% increase |
5% decrease |
10% decrease |
|||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
||||||||||||||||
Dollar/other |
(7,881 | ) | (6,700 | ) | (3,966 | ) | (2,372 | ) |
As at December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||
10% increase |
5% increase |
5% decrease |
10% decrease |
|||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
||||||||||||||||
Dollar/shekel |
37 | 19 | (19 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||||||
Dollar/other |
(22,193 | ) | (17,865 | ) | (7,843 | ) | (1,997 | ) |
D. Interest rate risk
(1) Type of interest
Set forth below is detail of the type of interest borne by the Groups interest-bearing financial instruments:
As at December 31 |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Carrying amount |
||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||
Fixed rate instruments |
||||||||
Financial assets |
239,629 | 172,965 | ||||||
Financial liabilities |
(1,479,700 | ) | (1,382,108 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(1,240,071 | ) | (1,209,143 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Variable rate instruments |
||||||||
Financial assets |
26,682 | | ||||||
Financial liabilities |
(849,172 | ) | (529,323 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(822,490 | ) | (529,323 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
F-104
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
D. Interest rate risk (contd)
(2) Fair value sensitivity analysis for fixed-rate instruments
The Groups assets and liabilities bearing fixed interest are not measured at fair value through the statement of income, and the Group does not designate derivatives (interest rate swaps) as hedging instruments under a fair value hedge accounting model. Therefore, a change in the interest rates as at the date of the report would not be expected to affect the income or loss in respect of changes in the value of fixed-interest assets and liabilities.
(3) Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments
This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2013.
As at December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||
Impact on income or loss |
||||||||||||||||
1% decrease
|
0.5% decrease
|
0.5% increase
|
1% increase
|
|||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||
Non-derivative instruments |
(39,200 | ) | (19,039 | ) | 17,987 | 34,988 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
As at December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||
Impact on income or loss |
||||||||||||||||
1% decrease |
0.5% decrease |
0.5% increase |
1% increase |
|||||||||||||
in interest |
in interest |
in interest |
in interest |
|||||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||||||
Non-derivative instruments |
622 | 311 | (312 | ) | (624 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Fair value
(1) Fair value compared with book value
The Groups financial instruments mostly include non-derivative assets, such as: cash and cash equivalents, investments, deposits and short-term loans, receivables and debit balances, investments and long-term receivables; non-derivative liabilities: such as: short-term credit, payables and credit balances, long-term loans and other liabilities; as well as derivative financial instruments.
Due to their nature, the fair value of the financial instruments included in the Groups working capital is generally identical or approximates the value, according to which they are stated in the accounts. The fair value of the long-term deposits and receivables and the long-term liabilities also approximates their stated value, as these financial instruments bear interest at a rate that approximates the accepted market rate of interest.
F-105
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
E. Fair value (contd)
(2) Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities
Accounting standards define a financial instrument as cash, ownership in an entity, or a contract by means of which the contractual right or obligation to receive or deliver cash or another financial instrument has been vested in or imposed on an entity. Fair value is defined as the amount for which an asset could be exchanged or liability settled, between knowledgeable, willing parties in an arms length transaction, assuming a going concern.
When a financial instrument is traded in an active and liquid market, its quoted market price in an actual transaction provides the best evidence of its fair value.
When a quoted market price is not available, or may not be indicative of the fair value of the instrument, to determine such fair value, the current market value of another instrument that is substantially similar, discounted cash flow analysis or other estimation techniques may be used, all of which are significantly affected by assumptions used.
Although Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent weaknesses in any estimation technique. As a result, the fair value may not be indicative of the net realizable or liquidation value.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, management considers that the book values of the financial instruments do not differ significantly from their estimated fair values; based on the methodologies and assumptions mentioned below:
| Cash and cash equivalent items and short-term deposits do not represent a credit risk or significant interest rate risk. Therefore, it has been assumed that their carrying value is approximate to their market value. |
| Derivative financial instruments are recorded at their estimated market value; therefore, there are no differences between their carrying value and their estimated market value. |
| For accounts receivable and payable with a maturity of less than one year, it has been considered that their fair values are not significantly different from their carrying values. |
| For short term loans and long-term interest bearing borrowings that accrue interest contracted at fixed rates, it has been estimated that their book value does not differ significantly from their market value, insofar as the interest rates of loans in effect do not differ significantly compared to year-end market interest rates. |
F-106
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
E. Fair value (contd)
(3) Hierarchy of fair value
The following table presents an analysis of the financial instruments measured at fair value, using an evaluation method. The various levels were defined as follows:
| Level 1: Quoted prices (not adjusted) in an active market for identical instruments. |
| Level 2: Observed data, direct or indirect, not included in Level 1 above. |
As at December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Total |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Derivatives used for hedging |
| 33,115 | 33,115 | |||||||||
Derivatives not used for hedging |
| 4,116 | 4,116 |
As at December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Total |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||
Derivatives used for hedging |
| | | |||||||||
Derivatives not used for hedging |
| 322 | 322 |
As at December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Total |
||||||||||
US$ thousands |
||||||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Derivatives used for hedging |
| 22,217 | 22,217 | |||||||||
Derivatives not used for hedging |
| 4,434 | 4,434 |
(4) Accounting classifications and fair values
The following table shows the carrying amounts and fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities, including their levels in the fair value hierarchy. It does not include fair value information for financial assets and financial liabilities not measured at fair value if the carrying amount is a reasonable approximation of fair value.
The fair value measurements have been categorized as Level 2 based on market comparison technique. The fair values are based on quotes. Similar contracts are traded in an active market and the quotes reflect the actual transactions in similar instruments.
F-107
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
(4) Accounting classifications and fair values (contd)
|
In thousands of U.S. dollars |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Carrying amount |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note |
Held-for trading |
Designated
|
Fair value
instruments |
Held-to- maturity |
Loan and
|
Available for-sale |
Other
|
Total |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 December 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets not measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| | | | 583,296 | | | 583,296 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short term deposits and restricted cash |
| | | | 207,646 | | | 207,646 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
| | | | 181,358 | | | 181,358 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other receivables and debit balances |
| | | | 47,427 | | | 47,427 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits, loans and debit balances, excluding derivatives |
| | | | 7,350 | | | 7,350 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap not used for hedging |
322 | | | | | | | 322 | | 322 | | 322 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
322 | | | | 1,027,077 | | | 1,027,399 | | 322 | | 322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap used for hedging |
| | 27,713 | | | | | 27,713 | | 27,713 | | 27,713 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forward exchange contracts used for hedging |
| | 5,402 | | | | | 5,402 | | 5,402 | | 5,402 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap not used for hedging |
4,116 | | | | | | | 4,116 | | 4,116 | | 4,116 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forward exchange contracts not used for hedging |
| | | | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4,116 | | 33,115 | | | | | 37,231 | | 37,231 | | 37,231 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities not measured at fair |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan from banks and others |
| | | | | | 1,450,442 | 1,450,442 | | 1,564,217 | | 1,564,217 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities in respect of finance leases |
| | | | | | 193,538 | 193,538 | | 212,835 | | 212,835 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debentures |
| | | | | | 703,952 | 703,952 | | 819,572 | | 819,572 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan from parent company |
| | | | | | 592 | 592 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
| | | | | | 143,639 | 143,639 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other payables and credit balances |
| | | | | | 89,578 | 89,578 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | 2,581,741 | 2,581,741 | | 2,596,624 | | 2,596,624 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-108
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 29Financial Instruments and Risk Management (contd)
(4) Accounting classifications and fair values (contd)
In thousands of U.S. dollars |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying amount |
Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note |
Held-for trading |
Designated
|
Fair value
instruments |
Held-to- maturity |
Loan and
|
Available for-sale |
Other financial
|
Total |
Level 1 |
Level 2 |
Level 3 |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31 December 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets not measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| | | | 516,804 | | | 516,804 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short term deposits and restricted cash |
| | | | 9,110 | | | 9,110 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
| | | | 138,261 | | | 138,261 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other receivables and debit balances |
| | | | 19,177 | | | 19,177 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits, loans and debit balances |
| | | | 7,288 | | | 7,288 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 690,640 | | | 690,640 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities measured at fair value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap used for hedging |
| | 8,867 | | | | | 8,867 | | 8,867 | | 8,867 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forward exchange contracts used for hedging |
| | 13,350 | | | | | 13,350 | | 13,350 | | 13,350 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swap not used for hedging |
4,427 | | | | | | | 4,427 | | 4,427 | | 4,427 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Forward exchange contracts not used for hedging |
7 | | | | | | | 7 | | 7 | | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4,434 | | 22,217 | | | | | 26,651 | | 26,651 | | 26,651 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities not measured at fair |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan from banks and others |
| | | | | | 886,464 | 886,464 | | 946,597 | | 946,597 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities in respect of finance leases |
| | | | | | 112,977 | 112,977 | | 87,770 | | 87,770 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debentures |
| | | | | | 669,724 | 669,724 | | 712,591 | | 712,591 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan from parent company |
| | | | | | 242,266 | 242,266 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
| | | | | | 113,124 | 113,124 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other payables and credit balances |
| | | | | | 46,902 | 46,902 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | 2,071,457 | 2,071,457 | | 1,746,958 | | 1,746,958 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-109
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 30Commitments
(a) IC Power Ltd
In 2011, IC Power Israel Ltd. together with Israel Corporation, and Dalkia Israel Ltd, together with Dalkia International S.A, provided an owners guarantees of NIS 80,000 thousand (US$20,571 thousand) and NIS 20,000 thousand (US$5,143 thousand), respectively, as part of the Facility Agreement. These guarantees are linked to the CPI of November 2010. As of December 31, 2014, the amount of the guarantees was NIS 105,912 thousand ($27,234 thousand). In December 2014, in light of Israel Corporation spinoff, OPC replaced IC guarantee with one from IC Power as well as NIS 45,000 thousand (US$ 11,571 thousand) cash deposit as collateral.
In October 2014, the Company issued a letter of credit for an amount of up to US$ 350 thousand to ensure any amount that IPP Rotem Operation and Maintenance Ltd. fails to pay according with the operation and maintenance agreement dated October 28, 2010 between IPP Rotem Operation and Maintenance Ltd. And Bank Leumi Le-Israel Trust Company.
In November, 2014, the Company and Dalkia provided a shareholder guarantee to OPCs Lenders in amount of NIS 15 million (US$3,857 thousand), due to OPCs exposure of a non-payment default resulting from Ex post payments.
(b) Inkia Energy Ltd
As of December 31, 2014, Inkia has issued standard by letters of credit for a total amount of US$ 79,925 thousand for guarantee, as follows:
Guarantee party |
Description |
Amount
|
Cash
|
|||||||
Kanan overseas I, Inc |
Bid Process in Panama | 1,100 | 1,100 | |||||||
Kanan overseas I, Inc |
Power Purchase agreement | 18,334 | 9,200 | |||||||
Lihuen S.A. |
Bid Process in Chile | 1,300 | | |||||||
Samay I S.A. |
Bond performance | 15,000 | | |||||||
Cerro del Aguila |
Contigent equity for over costs | 44,191 | |
(c) Cobee, Bolivia
Concession from the Bolivia Government
As of December 2010, COBEE was engaged in the generation of electricity under a concession granted to it by the Government of Bolivia, in October 1990 for a period of 40 years. The Bolivian government unilaterally transformed by supreme decree, all concessions to generate, transmit and distribute electricity to special temporary licenses. However, to date, the government has not issued regulations nor approved any procedure or guideline to convert such special temporary licenses into permanent licenses.
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA)
In March 2008, COBEE signed a long-term PPA agreement with Minera San Cristobal. Pursuant to the agreement, COBEE will supply 43 MW of availability and energy, commencing from December 22,
F-110
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 30Commitments (contd)
(c) Cobee, Bolivia (contd)
Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) (contd)
2008. The PPA agreement provides a fixed price for availability, and an energy price that is linked to the price of natural gas for production of electricity in Bolivia. Surplus energy and availability are sold in the spot market. The PPA agreement is scheduled to expire in 2017.
(d) Kallpa, Peru
Power Purchase Agreements (PPA)
As of December 31, 2014, Kallpa has entered into twenty three PPAs with unregulated consumers to provide capacity and the associated energy of 510 MW (twenty seven PPAs of 509 MW as of December 31, 2013). These contracts have various commencement dates, and vary in duration between 2013 and 2028. Also, as of December 31, 2014, the Company has signed twenty six PPAs with 7 distribution companies for 580 MW (thirteen PPAs with 4 distribution companies for 570 MW as of December 31, 2013).
The Peruvian market functions on the marginal cost method in which the generators bid their marginal cost to the market regulator who instructs the most efficient generators to produce electricity for the system. In the event the Company is not capable to meet its commitments under the contracts, the Company will be required to purchase energy in the spot market.
Gas Supply and Transportation
Kallpa purchases natural gas for its generation facilities from the Camisea consortium under an exclusive natural gas supply agreement dated January 2, 2006, as amended. Under this agreement, the Camisea Consortium agreed to supply Kallpas natural gas requirements, subject to a daily maximum amount and Kallpa agreed to acquire natural gas exclusively from the Camisea Consortium.
The Camisea consortium is obligated to provide a maximum of 4.3 million cubic meters of natural gas per day to our Kallpa plant and Kallpa is obligated to purchase a minimum of approximately 2.2 million cubic meters of natural gas per day. In the event that Kallpa does not consume the contracted minimum on any given day, Kallpa is permitted to use that lacking quantity on any day during the course of the following 18 months from the day of under-consumption.
The price that Kallpa pays to the Camisea consortium for the natural gas supplied is based on a base price in U.S. dollars set on the date of the agreement, indexed monthly based on a basket of market prices for heavy fuel oil, with discounts available based on the volume of natural gas consumed. This agreement expires in June 2022.
Kallpas natural gas transportation services are rendered by Transportadora de Gas del Peru S.A. (TGP) pursuant to a natural gas firm transportation agreement dated December 2007, as amended. In April 2014, this agreement was further modified to include the transportation agreement between Duke Energy Egenor S. en C. por A. and Las Flores. Pursuant to the modified agreement, TGP is obligated to transport up to 3.4 million cubic meters of natural gas per day from the Camisea Consortiums delivery point located at the Camisea natural gas fields to Kallpas facilities. This obligation will be reduced, first, by approximately 199,312 cubic meters per day beginning in March 2020 and, second, 206,039 cubic meters
F-111
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 30Commitments (contd)
(d) Kallpa, Peru (contd)
Gas Supply and Transportation (contd)
per day beginning in April 2030. This agreement expires in December 2033. Additionally, Kallpa is party to two additional gas transportation agreements, to become effective at the completion of the expansion of TGPs pipeline facilities (which is currently expected to occur during the second half of 2016). Pursuant to the first agreement, TGP will be obligated to transport up to 565,130 cubic meters of natural gas per day from the Camisea Consortiums delivery point located at the Camisea natural gas fields to Kallpas facilities. This agreement expires in April 2030. Pursuant to the second agreement, TGP will be obligated to transport up to 935,000 cubic meters of natural gas per day from the Camisea Consortiums delivery point located at the Camisea natural gas fields to Kallpas facilities. This agreement expires in April 2033. Additionally on April 1, 2014, Kallpa entered into an agreement with TGP to cover the period up to the completion of the expansion of TGPs pipeline facilities. Pursuant to this agreement, TGP is obligated to transport up to 120,679 cubic meters of natural gas per day from the Camisea Consortiums delivery point located at the Camisea natural gas fields to Kallpas facilities. Pursuant to the terms of each of these agreements, Kallpa pays a regulated tariff approved by the OSINERGMIN.
(e) Samay I, Peru
Power Node Bid Awarded
On November 29, 2013, Samay I won one of the public bid auctions promoted by the Peruvian Investment Promotion Agency (Proinversion) to build an open cycle diesel and natural gas (dual-fired) thermoelectric plant in Mollendo, Arequipa (southern Peru), with an installed capacity of approximately 600MW. The project has two operational stages: (i) cold reserve plant operating in diesel until natural gas becomes available in the area; and (ii) natural gas-fired power plant operating once a new natural gas pipeline is built and natural gas is available. The agreement with the Peruvian government is for a 20-year period with fixed monthly capacity payments and pass-through of all variable costs during the cold reserve phase.
The total investment for this plant is expected to be around US$ 380 million and to be funded with around 80% of debt and the remaining 20% with equity. The power plant is required to enter into commercial operation no later than April 30, 2016.
(f) CDA, Peru
Power Purchase Agreements (PPA)
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, CDA has entered into PPA with three distributions companies and a PPA with ElectroPerú to provide capacity and the associated energy of 402 MW. The PPA with distributions companies is for 202 MW, with 10-year terms, starting from January 2018 with final expiration in December 2027. The PPA with ElectroPerú is for 200MW, with 15-year terms, starting from January 2016 with final expiration in December 2030.
(g) OPC, Israel
Power Purchase Agreements (PPA)
On November 2, 2009, O.P.C. signed a power purchase agreement (hereinafterthe PPA) with Israel Electric Company Ltd. (hereinafterIEC) whereby O.P.C. undertook to construct a power plant within 49-52 months from the PPA signing date, and IEC undertook to purchase capacity and
F-112
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 30Commitments (contd)
(g) OPC, Israel (contd)
Power Purchase Agreements (PPA) (contd)
energy from O.P.C., over a period of twenty (20) years from the commencement date of commercial operation (COD) of the plant. The PPA is a capacity and energy agreement, meaning, a right of O.P.C. to provide the plants entire production capacity to IEC, and to produce electricity in the quantities and on the dates as required by IEC.
Pursuant to the PPA, O.P.C. bears the responsibility for obtaining all the approvals and permits required for construction of the power plant within 23 months from the PPA signing date, executing the financial closing within 24 months from the PPA signing date, starting commercial operation of the project within 49-52 months from the PPA signing date, and construction and operation of the power plant.
In March 2013 O.P.C. received a letter from IEC, claiming a breach of the PPA due to the delay in COD. O.P.C responded that it rejects the aforementioned claim. No legal claim has been filed by IEC. Based on the legal consultants, O.P.C. does not consider that it is more likely than not that IEC argument will be successful and therefore no provision was recorded in the financial statements.
Natural supply gas agreement
On November 25, 2012, O.P.C. signed an agreement with Tamar Partners regarding the natural gas supply to the power plant for a period commencing from the start of natural gas flowing to the power plant and ending 16 years later or the date on which O.P.C. will consume the total contractual quantity, whichever is earlier. In addition, each party has the right to extend the period of the agreement for a period of up two additional years under certain conditions or until the date of consuming the total contract quantity by O.P.C., whichever is earlier (hereinafter the Agreement). According to the Agreement, O.P.C. will purchase natural gas from the Tamar Partners, and the total contractual quantity of the Agreement is 10.6 BCM (billions of cubic meters).
The Agreement is subject to receipt of further other approvals, which to date, have not been received yet.
On September 3, 2013 the Tamar Partners informed O.P.C that the contract price for the natural gas should be updated. O.P.C. rejects such position based on its legal consultants and following a clarification published by the PUA on October 20, 2013, stating that the definition replacing the Production Cost reflects a tariff equal to 33.32 Agurot/KWh. O.P.C. considers that the lower tariff in amount of 33.32 Agurot/KWh shall apply for calculating the natural gas contract price under the natural gas supply agreement and therefore, does not include provision in the financial statements.
Israeli Electricity Reform
In July 2013, the Government of Israel appointed a steering committee for the execution of a reform in IEC and in the Israeli electricity industry (hereinafter the Committee). The Committee, which is headed by the Supervisor of the Government Companies Authority, includes Ministry representatives from the National Infrastructures, Energy and Water Resources and Finance sectors. The Committees main tasks include among others: the evaluation of the optimum structure for the electricity industry
F-113
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 30Commitments (contd)
(g) OPC, Israel (contd)
Israeli Electricity Reform (contd)
and for IEC and a proposal of an efficiency plan for IEC, and of an overall reform plan for the electricity industry and for IEC. In March 2014, a draft of the recommendations was issued, however these recommendations are still under discussion. Until these recommendations are not certain, O.P.C. is not able to estimate the impacts of the reform on its activities.
(h) CEPP, The Dominican Republic
CEPP had a contract with the distribution companies for the delivery of 50MW of capacity that expired on September 30, 2014.
(i) Nejapa El Salvador
Power Purchase Agreement
In May 2013, Nejapa entered into two PPAs that were awarded as a result of two tenders for 71.2 MW and 38.8 MW of capacity, with 54-month and 48-month terms, respectively. Each PPA was divided among the seven distribution companies that conducted the tenders. The term of each PPA commenced in August 2013.
(j) Poliwatt, Guatemala
Power Purchase Agreements (PPA)
As of December 31, 2014, Poliwatt has entered into twelve PPAs to provide capacity and energy of 193 MW. These contracts have various commencement dates, and vary in duration between 2013 and 2017.
(k) IC Power Nicaragua, Nicaragua
Power Purchase Agreements (PPA)
As of December 31, 2014, Tipitapa Power Company and Empresa Energetica Corinto have entered into two PPAs with Distribuidora de Electricidad del Norte (DISNORTE) and Distribuidora de Electricidad del Sur (DISSUR) to supply and sell firm power and energy.
In addition, Consorcio Eólico Amayo and Consorcio Eólico Amayo (Fase II) also entered into PPAs with these distribution companies, and are committed to supply and sell all the energy at the supply node as part of the wholesale market.
These contracts have various commencement dates, and vary in duration, as follows:
Company |
Commencement |
Expiration |
Contracted Capacity (MW) |
|||
Tipitapa Power Company |
June 1999 | December 2018 | 50.9 | |||
Empresa Energetica Corinto |
April 1999 | December 2018 | 50.0 | |||
Consorcio Eólico Amayo |
March 2009 | March 2024 | 39.9 | |||
Consorcio Eólico Amayo (Fase II) |
March 2010 | March 2025 | 23.1 |
F-114
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 30Commitments (contd)
(l) Kanan Overseas I, Inc, Panama
Power Purchase Agreement
In October, Kanan was awarded a contract to supply energy with a maximum contractual capacity of 86 megawatts with distributions companies for a 5 year term that will be effective starting in September, 2015. For such purpose, Kanan will be developing a project to install and operate thermal generation units with a total capacity of 92 megawatts.
Note 31Contingent Liabilities
The main contingencies for the Groups subsidiaries and associates are described as follows:
(a) Nejapa Power Company, LLC
Legal process with a Minority shareholder
Crystal Power, Nejapas minority shareholder brought claims against Nejapa Holdings and Inkia Salvadorian, Limited, collectively, the Inkia Defendants, as well as against the majority shareholder of Nejapa Holdings, and certain subsidiaries of El Paso Corporation (the former owner of Inkias interest in Nejapa Holdings), before the Court of the State of Texas at Brazoria County. The claims against the Inkia Defendants included claims relating to an issuance of new shares to Crystal Power by Nejapa Holdings, and allegations that Crystal Power had taken actions (i) preventing Nejapa Holdings from making distributions into an account opened by a New York Court as a result of an interpleader action filed by Nejapa Holdings, (ii) causing Nejapa to distribute dividends disproportionately and (iii) causing Inkia Salvadorian, Limited to use its majority position to harm Crystal Power. Crystal Power did not specify the amount of monetary damages against the Inkia Defendants.
The Inkia Defendants have asserted defenses in respect of these claims.
The plaintiff filed a request for partial summary judgment before the Texas State District Court of Brazoria County. The Brazoria Court denied the motion. The Inkia Defendants filed a claim against the plaintiff in the Texas State District Court of Harris County requesting the court to order the plaintiff to withdraw its claims pursuant to contractual undertakings under a settlement agreement entered into with El Paso Corporation.
The Parties were ordered by the Brazoria Court to assist a mediation hearing during July 2014. No settlement resulted from such hearing. A second mediation session was ordered by the Brazoria Court on October 30, 2014.
On December 31, 2014 the parties reached a settlement agreement in application of which the Inkia Defendants bought the shares of Crystal in Nejapa Holdings for a consideration of US$20,000 thousand which become effective on January 6, 2015. The parties agreed to file the dismissal motions and judgments to the courts for filing and entry. The parties had agreed to release, discharge and forever hold harmless the other party and each of their present and former parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, predecessors, managing agents, employees, among others. As a result of this agreement, Inkia owns 100% of the shares in Nejapa Power LLC.
(b) Cerro del Aguila (CDA)
Río Mantaro Claim
In March 2015, CDA and the CDA EPC contractors amended the CDA EPC to address the claim delivered by the EPC contractors to CDA in April 2014, which demanded a six-month extension for the construction
F-115
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 31Contingent Liabilities (contd)
(b) Cerro del Aguila (CDA) (contd)
Río Mantaro Claim (contd)
of the CDA Project and an approximately US$92 million increase in the total contract price of the CDA Project. Pursuant to the amendment, the CDA EPC contractors shall renounce any and all past, existing, or future claims against CDA, based on facts or events that occurred or were known, on or before the date of the amendment, in exchange for CDAs (i) payment of US$40 million, subdivided into 4 payments over the course of the remaining construction period and subject to the achievement of certain milestones, and (ii) grant of the extensions of the CDA Project construction schedule that were previously requested by the CDA EPC contractors, which range between four and six months in length, depending upon the applicable CDA unit.
The amendment to the CDA EPC is subject to the approval of the lenders under the CDA Project Finance Facility. Upon the receipt of such approval, CDA will pay the first of the four US$10 million payments owed to the CDA EPC Contractors under the amendment. The payment of the remaining US$30 million will be contingent upon the CDA EPC contractors satisfaction of certain construction milestones specified in the amendment to the CDA EPC. On May 12, 2015, the banks have approved this amendment. On May 21, CDA made the first US$10 million payment.
CDA is expected to commence commercial operation in the second half of 2016. As a result of the settlement with the CDA EPC contractors, the estimated cost of the CDA Project is not expected to exceed US$950 million, depending upon CDAs final utilization of the US$50 million contingency incorporated within the original US$910 million budgeted for the completion of the CDA Project.
(c) Compañía Boliviana de Energía Electrica (COBEE)
Energy Tariff Adjustment in Bolivia
As a result of a tariff review conducted by Autoridad de Fiscalización y Control Social (AE), the Bolivian electricity supervisory authority, the AE concluded that COBEE had collected excessive electricity tariffs equal to an amount of US$ 7,300 thousand and as a result, the AE determined COBEEs account in the electricity price stabilization fund (the Stabilization Account) should be debited with said excess.
After several filings, the amount of the excess was reduced to approximately US$ 5,219 thousand and the Stabilization Account was credited in proportion to said reduction. COBEE continues to challenge this conclusion.
In September 2013, the AE issued Resolution 498-2014(Resolution VIII), revoking resolutions V and VII and calculating an aggregate adjustment amount of US$ 5,400 thousand. Cobee challenged this last ruling, claiming review and recognition of US$ 500 thousand as last discussion item.
As of the date herein, the AE has issued Resolution 20-2014 (Resolution IX), accepting COBEEs petition, in part, and ruling a US$ 5,000 thousand as aggregate adjustment amount for the tariffs period 2006-2008.
Management considers that the result of these proceedings is uncertain. However, the risk derived from this process in immaterial because COBEE has not recorded the net revenues assigned in the stabilization account due to COBEEs inability to collect such balances. These revenues offset the contingency described above.
F-116
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 31Contingent Liabilities (contd)
(d) Kallpa Generación S.A.
Import Tax Assessment against Kallpa.
Since 2010, the Peru Customs Authority (known as SUNAT for its abbreviation in Spanish) issued tax assessments to Kallpa and its lenders for payment of import taxes allegedly owed by Kallpa in connection with imported equipment for installation and construction of Kallpa I, II, III and IV. The assessments were made on the basis that Kallpa did not include the value of the engineering services rendered by the contractor of the project in the tax base of import taxes. Kallpa disagrees with this tax assessment on the grounds that the engineering services rendered include the design of the plant and not the design of the imported equipment. Kallpa appealed the tax assessments before SUNAT in first instance and before the Peruvian Tax Court (known as Tribunal Fiscal) in second instance. SUNAT and the Peruvian Tax Court are administrative institutions under the Ministry of Economy and Finance. As of December 31, 2014, the decisions of the Peruvian Tax Court on this matter were pending.
In January 2015, Kallpa was notified that the Tax Court rejected Kallpas appeal regarding the Kallpa I assessment. Kallpa disagrees with the court´s decision and will appeal this decision to the Peruvian Judiciary. In order to appeal, Kallpa is required to pay the tax assessment of Kallpa I in the amount of approximately US$ 12.3 million, including interests and fines.
As of the end of February 2015, the total amount of import taxes claimed by SUNAT against Kallpa in connection with the import of equipment related to Kallpa I, II, II and IV projects, equals approximately US$ 34.8 million, including penalty interests and fines in the amount of US$ 27.6 million.
As a result of Kallpa I tax assessment; Kallpa paid approximately US$ 12.3 million, including interest and fines between March and April 2015. In addition, on April 15, 2015, Kallpa filed an appeal to the Superior Court of Lima.
Management and the Company´s legal advisors are of the opinion that Kallpa´s appeal should be more likely than not be successful; accordingly, no provision was recorded in the financial statements.
Note 32Subsequent Events
1. Inkia
On December 31, 2014 Crystal Power Company and Inkia reached a settlement agreement in application of which the Inkia Defendants bought the shares of Crystal in Nejapa Holdings for a consideration of US$20,000 thousand which become effective on January 6, 2015.
As a result of this agreement, Inkia increased its indirect holdings in Nejapa Power LLC from 70.85% to 100%. The difference between the consideration paid and the book value of US$1,922 thousand has been recorded as part of the Companys shareholders equity, in the retained earnings category.
2. Samay I
On April 24, 2015 Samay I received proceeds in the aggregate amount of US$ 99,000 thousand under its finance credit facility. After this disbursement, Samay I has drawn US$ 252,000 thousand (equivalent to 81% of the total debt approved).
F-117
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 32Subsequent Events (contd)
3. Cerro del Aguila
On June 9, 2015 CDA received proceeds in the aggregate amount of US$ 85,000 thousand under its finance credit facility. After this disbursement, CDA has drawn US$ 547,000 thousand (equivalent to 93% of the total debt approved).
4. OPC
Natural supply gas agreement
In January 2015, Public Utility Authority Electricity (hereinafter PUAE) updated the generation component of the time of use electricity tariff (TAOZ). This tariff is the basis for the price calculation between OPC and the end users, and for the natural gas price indexation according to the gas purchase agreement. According to the tariff update, the generation component will be divided into a number of different tariffs. In this decision, the PUAE clarified that the generation component that replaces the former component is 33.32 Agurot/Kwh. The weighted average generation component according the update is 30.09 Agurot/Kwh. As a result of this adjustment; the generation component was reduced by approximately 10% starting February 2015.
EPC Agreement
On April 20, 2015, OPC and Daewoo executed a settlement agreement, according to which OPC will pay Daewoo approximately US$ 4,151 thousand in relation to the EPC Agreement and associated payments, and Daewoo will pay OPC US$ 1,817 thousand due to of warranty claims and additional issues.
Israeli Electricity Reform
In August 2015, Israels Public Utilities Authority (the PUAE) published a decision that Independent Power Producers (IPPs) in Israel would be obligated to pay system management service charges, which charges are retroactively effective as of June 1, 2013. According to the PUAE decision, the amount of system management service charges that would be payable by OPC from the effective date of July 6, 2013 to June 2015, is approximately NIS 152 million (approximately US$40 million), not including interest rate and linkage costs. The company is considering the implications of this decision and may contest it.
In the financial statements (2014) initially authorized for issuance, OPC recorded provisions for system management service charges and diesel surcharges, which were recorded in the statement of financial position in the aggregate amount of US$70 million as of December 31, 2014. In the Companys opinion, due to the PUAE decision, it is more likely than not that OPC will not be charged more than the amount that was indicated in the PUAE decision. Therefore, OPC revised the provisions as of December 31, 2014 such that the total balance of the provision as of December 31, 2014 is US$27 million.
In August 2015, the PUAE also published for public a hearing regarding tariff update effective from September 9, 2015, and such tariff reflect a decline in average rates by approximately 7%. OPC uses
F-118
IC POWER LTD.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements as at December 31, 2014
Note 32Subsequent Events (contd)
4. OPC (contd)
Israeli Electricity Reform (contd)
privately negotiated rates to sell electricity to customers under its PPAs, but such rates are expressed as a discount to the generation component included within the PUA rate, so a decline in public rates will result in a corresponding decline in OPCs rates and, accordingly, its revenues. OPCs main cost of sales is gas, and prices for the gas it consumes under its supply agreement with the Tamar Group are indexed to the PUA generation component tariff and NIS/US$ exchange rate; however, this supply agreement also contains a floor price and, as a result of previous declines in the PUA generation component tariff, OPC will soon begin to pay the floor price, which will result in a decline in OPCs margins. The new rates are scheduled to become effective on September 9, 2015, pending final approval following a public hearing procedure concluded on August 25, 2015.
5. IC Power
On May 6, 2015 IC Power announced the execution of a Memorandum of Understanding with Hadera Paper Ltd. regarding the construction of a 120 megawatt cogeneration natural gas power plant. Both companies agreed to execute transaction agreements within 75 days of the date of the Memorandum, and to complete the transaction within 120 days of the signing date.
On June 8, 2015 IC Power executed an agreement with Hadera Paper Ltd., pursuant to which IC Power has agreed to acquire from Hadera Paper 100% of the shares in Advanced Integrated Energy Ltd. (Integrated Energy). Integrated Energy holds a conditional license for the construction of a 120MW cogeneration power station and operates Hadera Papers energy center at Hadera Papers site which currently supplies electricity and steam to Hadera Papers facility. Consideration for the transaction is NIS 60 million (approximately US$15.6 million). Additional investments by IC Power will be required to enable Integrated Energy to complete construction of the power plant, which is expected to commence operations in the second half of 2018. Completion of the acquisition is subject to satisfaction of various conditions precedent, including receipt of the required regulatory approvals, and the parties have the right to terminate the agreement if such conditions are not met by the end of 2015.
On August 10, 2015, after fulfilling the conditions precedent contemplated in the aforementioned agreement, IC Power completed the acquisition of Integrated Energy.
F-119
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in thousands of nuevos soles)
Note |
2014 |
2013 |
Note |
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||||||||
Assets |
Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
Current liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
6 | 238,427 | 172,907 | Trade accounts payable | 16 | 209,956 | 293,090 | |||||||||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
7 | 177,078 | 155,090 |
Other accounts payable to related parties |
8 | 30,686 | 4,489 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable from related parties |
8 | 4,797 | 26,986 | Other accounts payable | 17 | 88,996 | 71,982 | |||||||||||||||
Other accounts receivable |
9 | 73,998 | 111,294 | Provisions | 18 | 13,212 | 18,537 | |||||||||||||||
Inventories |
10 | 71,126 | 67,844 | Financial liabilities | 15 y 19 | 119,832 | 165,515 | |||||||||||||||
Assets for derivative instruments |
19 | | 646 | Income tax | | 31,630 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Other non-financial assets |
11 | 24,222 | 22,266 | Total current liabilities | 462,682 | 585,243 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
589,648 | 557,033 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
Financial liabilities | 19 | 693,379 | 638,999 | ||||||||||||||||||
Investments in Associates |
12 | 236,788 | 260,382 | Provisions | 18 | 15,899 | 15,126 | |||||||||||||||
Assets for derivative instruments |
19 | 80 | 36 |
Liabilities for deferred income tax |
22 | 673,474 | 769,648 | |||||||||||||||
Property, plant, and equipment |
13 | 3,678,581 | 3,750,010 | Provision for employee benefits | 21 | 3,910 | 3,394 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible assets |
14 | 52,419 | 52,146 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax asset |
22 | 4,546 | 29,165 | Total non-current liabilities | 1,386,662 | 1,427,167 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total non-current assets |
3,972,414 | 4,091,739 | Total liabilities | 1,849,344 | 2,012,410 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Equity | 24 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Share capital | 853,429 | 853,429 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other capital reserves | 160,674 | 142,406 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Reserves | 13,622 | 32,198 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated currency translation losses, net |
(25,964 | ) | (21,375 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Retained earnings | 430,762 | 386,592 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
1,432,522 | 1,393,250 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests | 1,280,196 | 1,243,112 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total equity | 2,712,718 | 2,636,362 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total assets |
4,562,062 | 4,648,772 | Total liabilities and equity | 4,562,062 | 4,648,772 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes on F-126 to F-195 are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-121
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in thousands of nuevos soles)
Note |
2014 |
2013 |
||||||||
Sales revenue: |
25 | |||||||||
Energy |
1,142,463 | 975,499 | ||||||||
Power |
536,843 | 435,872 | ||||||||
Other operating income |
22,175 | 21,072 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
1,701,481 | 1,432,443 | |||||||||
Generation costs |
26 | (1,008,450 | ) | (886,689 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Gross profit |
693,031 | 545,754 | ||||||||
Administrative expenses |
27 | (53,482 | ) | (53,320 | ) | |||||
Other operating income |
30 | 63,950 | 119,212 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Operating profit |
703,499 | 611,646 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other income (costs): |
||||||||||
Interest in Associate |
27,707 | 54,728 | ||||||||
Finance income |
31 | 6,954 | 4,968 | |||||||
Finance costs |
31 | (39,112 | ) | (43,636 | ) | |||||
Loss on exchange difference |
5 | (4,023 | ) | (5,615 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(8,474 | ) | 10,445 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Profit before income taxes |
695,025 | 622,091 | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
22 y 32 | (138,192 | ) | (167,726 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Profit for the year |
556,833 | 454,365 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Profit attributable to: |
||||||||||
Owners of Parent |
293,397 | 239,878 | ||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
263,436 | 214,487 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
556,833 | 454,365 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Weighted average of shares outstanding for calculation of earnings per share |
33 | 853,429 | 853,429 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Earning per basic and diluted shares |
33 | 0.344 | 0.281 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes on F-126 to F-195 are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-122
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in thousands of nuevos soles)
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Profit for the year |
556,833 | 454,365 | ||||||
Variation for cash flow hedgenet exchange rate of tax effects |
(36,584 | ) | (51,652 | ) | ||||
Variation for cash flow hedgenet interest rate of tax effects |
975 | 187 | ||||||
Exchange difference from conversion |
(8,467 | ) | 1,559 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total comprehensive income for the year |
512,757 | 404,459 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes on F-126 to F-195 are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-123
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in thousands of nuevos soles)
Share
|
Other capital
|
Other
|
Accumulated
|
Retained
|
Non-controlling
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2012 |
853,429 | 132,241 | 59,071 | (22,220 | ) | 339,378 | 1,217,138 | 2,579,037 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | | 239,878 | 214,487 | 454,365 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
| | (26,874 | ) | 845 | | (23,877 | ) | (49,906 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year |
| | (26,874 | ) | 845 | 239,878 | 190,610 | 404,459 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Year 2012 dividend payment
|
| | | | (54,394 | ) | (49,980 | ) | (104,374 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Year 2013 dividend pre-payment (note 24(c)) |
| | | | (128,109 | ) | (114,661 | ) | (242,770 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Approval of legal reserve
|
| 10,166 | | | (10,161 | ) | 5 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2013 |
853,429 | 142,407 | 32,198 | (21,375 | ) | 386,592 | 1,243,112 | 2,636,362 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | | 293,397 | 263,436 | 556,833 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
| | (18,576 | ) | (4,589 | ) | | (20,911 | ) | (44,076 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year |
| | (18,576 | ) | (4,589 | ) | 293,397 | 242,525 | 512,757 | |||||||||||||||||||
Effect of the merger |
| | | | 284 | | 284 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year 2013 dividend payment
|
| | | | (85,149 | ) | (76,172 | ) | (161,321 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Year 2014 dividend pre-payment (note 24(c)) |
| | | | (146,100 | ) | (129,273 | ) | (275,373 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Approval of legal reserve
|
| 18,267 | | | (18,262 | ) | 4 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2014 |
853,429 | 160,674 | 13,622 | (25,964 | ) | 430,762 | 1,280,196 | 2,712,718 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes on F-126 to F-195 are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-124
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013
(Stated in thousands of nuevos soles)
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Cash receipts from customers |
2,043,315 | 1,707,473 | ||||||
Cash payments to suppliers, related parties, employees and tax authority |
(1,227,065 | ) | (989,093 | ) | ||||
Other cash payments related to operations, net |
(232,419 | ) | (180,066 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash from operating activities |
583,831 | 538,314 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flow from investing activities |
||||||||
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment |
(96,733 | ) | (54,922 | ) | ||||
Dividends received from associates |
65,615 | 23,955 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(31,118 | ) | (30,967 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities |
||||||||
Increase in financial obligations |
165,323 | 11,080 | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(415,808 | ) | (346,724 | ) | ||||
Amortization or payment of financial liabilities |
(201,836 | ) | (139,645 | ) | ||||
Interests and income |
(35,395 | ) | (41,184 | ) | ||||
Other cash payments related to financing, net |
(2,416 | ) | (2,977 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(490,132 | ) | (519,450 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
2,939 | (3,097 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Increase (decrease) in net cash and cash equivalents |
65,520 | (15,200 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
172,907 | 188,107 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
238,427 | 172,907 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes on F-126 to F-195 are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
F-125
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2014 and 2013
(1) Reporting Entity
(a) Background
Generandes Perú S.A. (hereinafter the Company) is a stock corporation created in Peru initiating operations in December 1995. Its legal domicile is located at Avenida Víctor Andrés Belaúnde 147, Torre Real Cuatro, San Isidro, Lima, Peru.
The Company is a subsidiary of Endesa Chile S.A. which holds 60.998% of capital stock as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, a company which in turn is a subsidiary of Endesa S.A. from Spain, which is controlled by Enel, S.p.A. (hereinafter Enel) from Italy.
On October 21, 2014, at General Extraordinary Stockholders Meeting, Endesa S.A. approved to sell Enel Energy Europe the share of 60.62% in the capital stock of the Chilean Society Enersis, S.A. of which it was holder directly and indirectly.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has as subsidiaries Edegel S.A.A. with the 54.20% and through it, it holds shares of 43.36% in Chinango S.A.C, respectively (hereinafter the Subsidiaries).
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, Chiango S.A.C is a subsidiary of Edegel S.A.A. which holds shares of 80% in the capital stock.
On September 3, 2014, Enersis S.A., finally acquired total shares that held with Southern Cone Power Perú S.A. equivalent to 39.002% of the Companys shares. With it, the group is owner of 100.00% of the Companys shares.
(b) Business Activity
The Company is involved in the generation of electrical energy, directly or through companies incorporated for that purpose and for acquiring, maintaining and selling investments in assets of other companies preferably engaged in electricity generation.
Edegel S.A.A.
Edegel S.A.A. is mainly engaged in the generation and commercialization of Electrical energy and power to private and public companies. Edegel S.A.A. has five hydroelectric power plants, three of them are located in the basins of the Santa Eulalia and Rimac rivers, approximately 50 km from Lima with effective power of 561.1 MW. It also has two thermoelectric plants, one with effective power of 412.5 MW, located in the Cercado de Lima and another with 485.0 MW located in Ventanilla. Total effective power amounts to 1,458.6 MW.
Chinango S.A.C.
Chinango S.A.C. is engaged in electricity generation, commercialization and transmission activities. For this purpose, it has two hydroelectric power plants (Yanango and Chimay), located in the department of Junín, with an effective generation capacity of 193.5 MW.
F-126
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, Chinango S.A.C. is a subsidiary of Edegel S.A.A., which holds 80% capital stock.
Main data of consolidated financial statements of Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the periods then ended are as follows:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Operating income |
1,701,481 | 1,432,443 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Operating profit |
704,078 | 612,374 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net profit attributable to controlling interests |
542,373 | 443,910 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(c) Approval of Consolidated Financial Statements
On March 2, 2015, the Companys management approved and authorized the issuance of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014. On February 6, 2014, the Companys management approved and authorized the issuance of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013.
(2) Operating Regulation and Legal Standards Affecting the Electric Sector
The Company and its Subsidiaries are within the scope of various rules governing their activities. Failure to comply with these rules may result in the imposition of sanctions on the Company and its Subsidiaries, affecting both financially and operationally. Management of the Company and its Subsidiaries monitor and evaluate the standard compliance and any complaints presented. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, management considers that there are no situations that may need disclosures or provisions on the consolidated financial statements except for those indicated in note 36 of this report.
F-127
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Regulatory framework governing the activities of the Company and its Subsidiaries can be summarized as follows:
(a) Electricity Concessions Law
In conformity with the Electricity Concession Law, approved through Decree-Law 25844, the electricity sector is divided into three main subsectors, each one covering a different activity: generation, transmission and distribution of electricity. Under that law and law 28832, Law to Ensure the Efficient Development of the Electric Generation , the operations of Sistema Eléctrico Interconectado Nacional (National Electrical Interconnected System) shall be governed by provisions of Comité de Operación Económica del Sistema Interconectado Nacional (Economical Operation Committee of the National Interconnected SystemCOES-SINAC, in order to coordinate their operation at minimum cost, guaranteeing the supply of electric energy and the best exploitation of energy resources, as well as the planning of the transmission and management of short-term market. Also, COES-SINAC determines and values the transfers of power and energy between generators.
(b) Law to Guarantee the Efficient Development of Electricity Generation
In July 2006, Law 28832, Law to Ensure the Efficient Development of the Electric Generation , was enacted being some of its main objectives to ensure sufficient and efficient generation which will reduce the exposure of the Electrical system to the volatility of prices and the risks of rationing, as well as to adopt necessary measures to foster an effective competition in the generation market.
One of the main innovations introduced by the standard is a mechanism of bids that electricity distribution companies shall apply to enter into electricity supply contracts with generating companies to supply electricity public services and, optionally, in the case of free users. The purpose of such provision is to establish a mechanism to promote the development of investments in new generation capacity through long-term electricity supply contracts and firm prices with distributors.
(c) Supervising Body of Investment in Energy and Mines
Organismo Supervisor de la Inversión en EnergíaOSINERGMIN- is the body regulating, supervising and inspecting the activities developed by the entities of the electricity, hydrocarbons and mining sub-sectors, safeguarding quality and efficiency of the service rendered to users, and monitoring compliance with obligations assumed by concessionaires as well as current legal provisions and technical norms, including those related to environment protection and preservation. Also, as part of its standard-setting role, OSINERGMIN may issue related rules and standards of general nature, applicable to entities and users of the sector.
In conformity with Supreme Decree 001-2010-MINAM, OSINERGMIN transferred the environmental supervising, inspecting and sanctioning functions related to hydrocarbons in general and electricity, to the Agency for Environmental Assessment and InspectionOEFA-, an agency established by Legislative Decree 1013 which approved the Law for the Creation, Organization and Functions of the Ministry of the Environment.
(d) Environmental Protection Regulations
In conformity with Electricity Concessions Law and Law 28611, Environmental Act, the Government shall design and apply policies, norms, instruments, incentives and necessary penalties aimed at preserving appropriate environment and National Cultural Heritage, as well as ensuring the rational use of natural resources in the development of activities related to the generation, transmission and supply of electricity and hydrocarbon
F-128
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
activities. In this sense, the Ministry of Energy and Mines has approved the Regulation of Environmental Protection in Electricity Activities (Supreme Decree N°29-94-EM) and the Regulation of Environmental Protection in Hydrocarbon Activities (Supreme Decree 015-2006-EM).
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Companys and its Subsidiaries Management estimates that, in the event of a contingency related to environmental management, it would not significantly affect the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
(e) Technical Quality Standards of Electricity Services
Supreme Decree N° 020-97-EM, approved the Technical Standard of Electricity Services Quality (NTCSE), which establishes the minimum quality levels of the electricity services, including street lighting and obligations of electrical sector companies, as well as clients operating within the framework of the Electricity Concession Law.
NTCSE provides for tolerances and quality indicator measurement procedures that shall be taken into account, requiring their compliance by Electrical companies and establishing the methods for calculation of compensations referred to violations of the indicators, being COES SINAC the body in charge of assigning responsibilities and calculating the compensation as mandated by the Law to Ensure the Efficient Development of The Electric generation.
Supreme Decree 057-2010-EM, dated September 11, 2010, which amended the NTCSE, established that if as a result of technical research and analysis conducted by the COES SINAC it is determined that the deficiency of quality is strictly due to a lack of capacity transmission system congestion, agents and COES are exempted from payment of compensation.
(f) Antimonopoly and Anti-oligopoly Law of the Electric Sector
In November 1997, the Anti-monopoly and Anti-oligopoly Law of the Electric Sector, Law 26876, was issued establishing a limit in the participation in electric power generation companies in order to avoid concentrations that would affect competition in the electricity market (vertical integrations over 5% or horizontal concentrations over 15%).
Resolution 012-99/INDECOPI/CLC establishes the conditions to preserve free competition and transparency in the sector that affect the Company and its Subsidiaries. The main aspect is that Edelnor S.A.A. (company related to Endesa Group and client of its Subsidiaries) must tender its purchases of electricity among all generators existing in the system as its contracts expire, and shall pass into public domain the procedures and results of each tender.
(g) System Guaranteeing the Supply of Electric Energy to SEIN
From year 2004, some contracts of energy supply to distributor companies expired without being renewed nor awarded to a new supplier; thus resulting in withdrawals of energy and power carried out by distributor companies to meet the regulated market, being assigned by COES to the SEIN generators based on various criteria over time.
This situation denominated in the sector as withdrawals without contractual support generated several distortions in the electricity market; as a result, the State tried several solutions through a number of legal provisions such as Urgency Decree 007-2004, Law 28447, Urgency Decree 007-2006, Urgency Decree 036-2006 and Law 29179, among other provisions of lower status.
F-129
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Meanwhile, as a result of the significant growth in the demand for electricity and natural gas, as from year 2006, several incidents related to the congestion of the electricity transmission system and the natural gas transportation systems were registered.
The restrictions on production and transportation of natural gas and electricity transmission are events that result in negative externalities, producing increased operating costs of the electricity system and distorting the marginal costs in the spot market.
In order to avoid distortions of marginal costs, a number of legal provisions were issued to reduce the effects of these events on the electricity market. Thus, the Twelfth Final Supplementary Provision of Law 28832, Emergency Decree 046-2007, Legislative Decree 1041 and its Regulations approved by Supreme Decree 041-2008-EM and Emergency Decree 037-2008, as amended by Emergency Decree 049-2011, provided a number of compensation mechanisms for those variable costs that were not covered by the short-term marginal costs calculated by application of these provisions, depending on whether they are related to natural gas transmission or transportation. However, the criteria used for the allocation of such compensations considered a variety of factors, although they related to aspects of the same nature, which represented a number of risks that hinder the contracting of electricity.
Therefore, in order to avoid problems such as those above described and to establish a treatment regarding withdrawals without contractual support, Emergency Decree 049-2008 was issued establishing a uniform criterion for the treatment of marginal cost in the situations described, as well as a regulation for withdrawals without contractual support, thus annulling any provision establishing a different treatment which will be in force during the period comprised between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011.
Regarding withdrawals without contractual support, the Emergency Decree 049-2008 established that physical withdrawals of power and energy made by electricity distribution companies in SEIN for the Public Electricity Service, without respective contracts supply entered into with generating companies shall be allocated to generators valued at busbar prices proportionally to the net value of the annual efficient firm energy of each generator less its sale of power by contracts. In these cases, the costs incurred by generators to meet those withdrawals, presented due to higher marginal costs in relation to busbar prices are incorporated in the Tariff for connection to Main Transmission System and assumed by the demand; in turn, margins earned by generators from marginal costs lower than busbar prices passes to the demand, whereby the allocated energy without contractual support does not provide a trading margin, i.e . in net terms, generator sells and buys this energy at marginal costs without a contract.
With regard to Short-Term Marginal Costs of SEIN, Emergency Decree 049-2008 established that they are determined considering that there is no restriction of production or transportation of natural gas and electricity transmission. It was also decided that the Short-Term Marginal Costs could not exceed a limit value (S/.313.50/MWh in accordance with Ministerial Resolution 607-2008-MEME/DM). It also indicates that the difference between the variable operating costs incurred by plants operating with variable costs greater than Short-Term Marginal Costs shall be covered through an additional fee on the Tariff for connection to Main Transmission System and assumed by the Demand.
The validity of the Emergency Decree 049-2008 was extended twice; the first time it was extended until December 31, 2013 by Emergency Decree 079-2010 and the second time it was extended until December 31, 2016 by Law 30115 Law of Financial Equilibrium of the Public Sector Budget for the Fiscal Year 2014, published on December 2, 2013.
F-130
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(h) Short-Term Market Regulation
The Short-Term Market Regulation was published in June 2011 by means of Supreme Decree 027-2011-EM establishing that this market should become effective on January 1, 2014; however since the MINEM is preparing a proposal for amending this regulation by means of Supreme Decree 032-2012-EM published on August 30, 2012, it was decided to postpone the beginning of the effective date of that market until January 2016, thus suspending all the actions conducted for the approval of the technical procedures of the COES necessary to make the operation effective.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, some of the aspects set by that regulation still in force are:
Agents envisaging to participate in the short-term market must integrate the COES. The Free Users must have equipment for independent, remote and automatic disconnection. Distributors must constitute guarantees and trusteeships and identify Free Users for whom they buy in that market and also be up to date with its payments resulting from operations. Large Users formed by the group of Free Users shall appoint a representative and enter into a joint and several liability agreements.
Short-term market participants allowed to buy are: i) generators, to meet their supply contracts (except for distributed generators and those using renewable resources), ii) distributors, to serve free Users, and iii) Large Users, to meet their own requirements.
In turn, short-term market participants allowed to sell are: i) Generators, up to the amount of capacity that they can generate with their own plants and/or capacity contracted with third parties, ii) Generators using renewable energy resources ruled by Legislative Decree 1002, up to the capacity limit that they can generate with its own power plants, and iii) the Co-generators and Generator-Distributors connected to the SEIN, up to the limit of their energy surpluses not contracted.
Participants buying in the short-term market shall not be exempted from charges for transmission, distribution and other services and / or regulated uses. COES may decide on power cut to Large Users and Free Users for non-compliance with obligations and/or payments, and holders of the connection systems are required to make such cuts. It also states that congestion pricing will be allocated to those affected by congestion.
Transfers shall be made based on actual marginal costs obtained from the real-time operation.
Operating costs for rigidities and complementary services not covered by actual marginal costs will be determined by COES and assumed by the members of the short-term market.
The guarantees given by the supplier shall be easily realizable and enforceable and shall cover all obligations of the Participants.
COES must also establish the criteria for the creation of trusts by purchasing participants, considering that trusts of Distributors shall guarantee the payment of their Free Users.
(i) Energy Security System on Hydrocarbons and Energy and Social Inclusion Fund
Law 29852, published on April 13, 2012 created: The Energy Security System on Hydrocarbons (SISE) and Energy and Social Inclusion Fund (FISE), whose regulation was established by Supreme Decree 021-012-EM published on June 9, of the same year.
F-131
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
SISE should be composed of a network of pipelines and storage facilities considered as strategic by the Government for ensuring the nationwide fuel supply, which will be paid by a charge to pipeline transportation of liquid products derived from hydrocarbons and natural gas liquids. FISE shall be used to widespread the use of natural gas for residences and vehicles in vulnerable sectors and to compensate the development of new energy supplies in energy frontier, and for social compensation and promotion of access to LPG in vulnerable urban and rural communities. This fund is funded by free electricity users, through a surcharge on pipeline transportation of liquid products derived from liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas liquids, and through a surcharge on the monthly billing of users of the service of natural gas transport through pipelines.
(j) Temporary Measures Associated with Remuneration for Power
By Supreme Decree 032-2012 -EM, published on August 30, 2012, the Ministry of Energy and Mines established transitory provisions related to the remuneration for Firm Power from thermoelectric units.
It was established that a natural gas power plant guarantees the transportation of natural gas when the contracted firm capacity allows operating at effective power during peak hours. This modification allows the thermoelectric units with firm transportation capacity of gas power to operate effectively during peak hours (even though they do not have the carrying capacity that allows them to operate 24 hours a day at effective power) to participate with such power and its variable cost of natural gas in preparing the ranking of variable costs used to determine the power units that pay for power by participating in the coverage of high demand and reservation of system.
This provision is temporary and will be in force while the gas transport concessionaire, Transportadora del Gas del Perú S.A. (TGP), does not have the carrying capacity set forth in the Addendum to the BOOT contract (Build , Operate, Own, Transfer) signed with the Peruvian State.
(k) Exchange of Information in Real Time for SEIN Operation
On November 27, 2012, the Ministry of Energy and Mines issued Resolution 243-2012-EM/DGE approving the adoption of a new Technical Standard for the Exchange of Information in Real Time for the SEIN operation , which replaced the previously existing rule, approved by Directorial Resolution 055-2007-EM/DGE dated December 3, 2007.
The approved standard adopted a new stratification of information of signals and states of the power system submitted in real time to the System Coordinator, based on the voltage level criterion, to weigh the information that is most relevant for the coordination of SEIN operation in real time.
Concerning the requirements of availability of signals rates, the application phases were redefined. A first stage was approved with a minimum availability of 75%, which will be valid until May 27, 2014, a second stage with a minimum availability of 90% for a period of 1 year from the completion of the first stage; and a third stage, called the target stage with an availability of 96% in some cases and 98% in the case of signals considered as high priority, which correspond to premises with voltage levels greater than or equal to 100 kV and power plants greater than or equal to 50 MW.
Ministry of Energy and Mines through Directorial Resolution 444-2013-EM-DGE, published on October 31, 2013 modified Directorial Resolution 243-2012-EM-DGE, establishing that the COES must retransmit in real-time to OSINERGMIN and the General Electricity Agency of the Ministry of Energy and Mines, the information exchanged through the communication network between the control centers of the members of SEIN and the control center of COES.
F-132
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(l) Mass Use of Natural Gas
On December 22, 2012, Law 29969 Law dictating regulations to promote the mass use of natural gas was published. This Law established that OSINERGMIN shall transfer S/. 200 million to FISE; it empowered state electricity distribution companies to implement programs for mass use of natural gas, including the distribution of natural gas in their concession areas. The Ministry of Energy and Mines, in a maximum period of 3 years after the start of the distribution of gas, shall begin the process of promoting private investment for awarding the gas distribution concession. Local and regional governments were also authorized to transfer the resources arising from royalties to the state electricity distribution companies.
Modification was also made on the Law Creating the SISE and FISE, which established that the charge levied by the carrier of natural gas from the electricity generator, must be compensated by the demand through an additional charge included in the toll of the main transmission Electrical system. It also said that the mass use of natural gas for residences and vehicles shall mainly focus on poor population and regions that do not have royalties.
Supreme Decree 014-2013 -EM, published on May 25, modified the regulations on Law for Promotion of Natural Gas Industry (Law 27133) approved by Supreme Decree 040-99 -EM. This supreme decree modified several articles of said regulations. It also proposes the development of pipeline branches along the main transport network whose construction, operation and maintenance will be provided by the Transport Concessionaire in order to promote the mass use of natural gas delivering this hydrocarbon to new areas of natural gas distribution (cities surrounding the path of the Main Network).
Since the current regulations on Law for Promotion of Natural Gas do not require the transport concessionaire to invest in such infrastructure, it is necessary to enter into an Addendum between the Government (grantor) and the Transport Concessionaires including a Main Network scheme, to include in their transport systems the indicated branches, called Main Referrals.
The annuity of the Operation and Maintenance of the said branches shall be determined according to the efficient costs as determined by OSINERGMIN taking into account the economic and financial information of the concessionaire, using in the same way the discount rate of the concession agreement.
Yearly income to be received by the holder of the Main Bypass will consist of: 1) contributions from Independent Consumers served by the main take-off pipelines (whose tariff will be calculated with the maximum carrying capacity of the take-off pipeline), and 2) the contributions of the National User/Consumer of the Main Network who pays regulated tariffs affected by a Tariff Application Factor (FAT) as defined by OSINERGMIN, which may not exceed of 1.2.
(m) Energy Security and Development of the Southern Petrochemical Complex
On December 22, 2012, Law 29970 Law that Strengthens the Energy Security and Promotes the Development of the Southern Petrochemical Complex was published. This Law declared of national interest the implementation of measures for strengthening the energy security, obtaining and transporting ethane in the south of the country, and the construction of regional pipelines in the regions of Huancavelica, Junín and Ayacucho, from the existing pipeline. Also by means of this Law, complementary provisions were enacted to streamline and simplify the administrative procedures related to obtaining permits and authorizations.
F-133
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Regarding the strengthening of energy security:
(i) | The companies responsible for implementing the projects of natural gas and natural gas liquids supply would be benefited from the Guaranteed Income mechanism provided that there is an improvement in the energy security of the electricity sector, being necessary to grant such projects through concession agreements arising from investment promotion processes. |
(ii) | A number of necessary projects were established to increase energy security, provided they operate together and in parallel with the transport system of gas and/or liquids currently existing in Camisea, among which we can mention: |
| A gas pipeline and liquids pipeline from Camisea to Chiquintirca Compression Station, except for the section that under contractual obligation corresponds to the existing concessionaire. |
| A gas pipeline and/or liquids pipeline from the existing system to Anta, Cusco which shall be able to supply natural gas to the future Quillabamba Power Plant and to the south coast of Peru. |
| A regasification plant and premises for import of liquefied natural gas located in Pampa Melchorita. |
(iii) | The portion non recovered with the tariff income of the concessionaire may be covered as per the mentioned Guaranteed Income mechanism or as established by Law 29852 Energy Security System on Hydrocarbons and Energy and Social Inclusion Fund as the Ministry of Energy and Mines may establish. |
(iv) | ELECTROPERÚ will participate in the development of the Southern Petrochemical Complex project by supplying natural gas and contracting gas carrying capacity from Anta to the south coast of Peru for the operations of said Energy Complex and the Petrochemical Complex in southern Peru. |
(v) | Users will assume as an additional charge in the toll of the main transmission system: i) compensations related to natural gas costs that foster the installation of power generation in the north and south of Peru, and ii) the contracting of gas firm transport not covered by existing generators, in order to make feasible the development of the South Nodal Energy. |
Regarding the development of the Petrochemical Complex the following is established:
| Ethane can be obtained through: i) negotiation with Contractors of blocks exploiting or that will exploit natural gas; or ii) the extraction of ethane from natural gas purchased by customers. |
| PETROPERU will participate in the development of the Petrochemical Complex and its participation will be established by the Ministry of Energy and Mines. |
| The Ministry of Energy and Mines will make a capital increase in Petroperu for up to US$ 400 million which has a temporary character for up to a maximum of 15 years. |
Through Supreme Decree 038-2013-EM, published on October 17, 2013, the Ministry of Energy and Mines approved a regulation that promotes the growth of electricity generation within the framework of Law 29970; among other considerations, it was established that the Ministry of Energy and Mines, by means of Ministerial Resolution, will approve, every two years, at the request of COES and view of OSINERGMIN, the requirement of capacity, location and terms of commercial operation that shall be bid, necessary to strengthen the energy security.
F-134
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Also, by means of Supreme Decree 005-2014-EM published on February 7, 2014, the Ministry of Energy and Mines approved the regulation of Law 29970 referred to the promotion of an Integrated Transport System of Hydrocarbons, which comprises the transport systems of natural gas and natural gas liquids within the security area and the transport system of natural gas through the Peruvian southern gas pipeline.
The above mentioned security area corresponds to the region comprised between Malvinas, Chiquintirca (at 207 km of Camisea over the current pipeline route) in Ayacucho and Anta (approximately at 170 km to the south of the current pipeline, where Electroperú will establish its future thermal power station Quillabamba) in Cusco; in this area, the State guarantees reliability and availability of the supply of hydrocarbons.
Among other measures, by means of this Decree, it is possible to define a Charge for Strengthening of Energy Security (CASE) which will be collected from consumers through a Main Transmission System Toll, having as purpose to complete the missing amount so that the concessionaire of such Integrated System of Natural Gas Transport earns the corresponding Annual Guaranteed Income as a result of the award process of the concession; the administration of such charge will be under the responsibility of OSINERGMIN. The term to initiate pre-payments of Guaranteed Income of Integrated Systems will be defined by the Ministry of Energy and Mines and it shall not exceed 6 months from the signing date of the Concession Agreement.
Also, by means of Supreme Decree 014-2014-EM published on May 6, 2014, additional provisions were established in order to apply Law 29970; among them, we find those related to prepayments of Guaranteed Income of the Concessionaire of the Security System for Transport of natural gas and natural gas liquids and Southern Andes pipeline, collection of CASE and SISE charges and those regulated fees of natural gas on behalf of prepayments, as well as the trust created to manage such collection.
(n) Mechanism for Natural Gas Disruption Emergency Response
By means of Supreme Decree 050-2012-EM, published on December 31, 2012, a mechanism was established for dealing with emergencies that endanger the continuity of natural gas supply which will be activated in emergency situations that are beyond the control of the producer and/or concessionaire of transport and/or distribution and that may fully or partially affect the natural gas and/or liquids of natural gas activities.
| It is established that in such situations the available natural gas will be used solely for the domestic market, following an order of priority, being the electric generators ranked in fourth place of priority, after regulated residential and commercial customers and transport users. |
| An automatic statement of Exceptional Situation is established in the SEIN. |
| Payment of compensation for deficiencies in product quality and power supply is exempted. |
| Permission is granted to those who are required to maintain stocks of liquid fuels, for using them. |
(o) The Energy Policy and Plan for Universal Access to Energy
In order to have a reliable, efficient, and self-sufficient energy supply, with reasonable prices, minimal environmental impact, and little exposure to increased volatility in prices for fossil fuels, the Peruvian government considered it necessary to establish a state policy in the energy field so that the energy requirement that accompanies all economic growth can be guaranteed in the medium- and long-term.
F-135
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Accordingly, Supreme Decree 064-2010-EM, published on November 24, 2010, approved the Perus National energy policy for the period 2010-2040 which sets 9 energy policy objectives and their respective guidelines, which consist of:
(i) | Diversification of the energy matrix with emphasis on renewable sources and energy efficiency. This policy establishes the need to promote projects and investments to diversify energy matrix through renewable conventional and non- conventional sources, hydrocarbons, geothermal and nuclear sources; it also establishes the promotion of the use of distributed generation and prioritize the construction of hydroelectric plants. |
(ii) | Competitive energy supply. It establishes the need to have the necessary infrastructure throughout the electricity and hydrocarbons supply chain to ensure energy supply; it also establishes a regulatory framework that promotes competition, minimizes the market concentration and promotes pricing transparency, and regulates access and rates when it is not possible to establish competition mechanisms. Other guidelines of this objective are to develop mechanisms to limit the impact of volatility of world market prices, and to promote private investment; the State performing its subsidiary role. |
(iii) | The universal access to energy supply; this objective seeks to achieve total coverage of electricity and hydrocarbons supply, temporarily subsidizing it for low-income populations. Also it establishes that local communities shall be involved in rural electrification projects, fostering the productive use of energy in remote, rural and marginal urban areas. Transport systems necessary for the service to reach all locations should also be prioritized. |
(iv) | The efficiency in the production and consumption of energy; to achieve this goal it is necessary to encourage the efficient use of energy to obtain measurable results, being necessary to involve energy companies and users in energy efficiency programs through promoters and incentive mechanisms. It also addresses the need to use smart technology systems to ensure appropriate management of the supply and demand of energy and the creation of the energy- efficiency center to be a decentralized organization that promotes the efficient use of energy. |
(v) | Self-sufficiency in energy production; it proposes the promotion of the production of electricity based on available energy resources in the regions and fostering exploration and exploitation of these resources. It also shall promote investments to implement, upgrade and expand the countrys refineries in order to meet domestic demand. On the other hand, it also considers maintaining supply procurement processes to achieve beforehand the adequacy of power generation. It also establishes the rational use of energy resources to ensure their availability. |
(vi) | The energy sector development with minimal environmental impact; this objective foster the development and use of clean energy and technology with low emissions of pollutants as well as the establishment of mitigating mechanisms for emissions from energy activities. It aims at promoting energy projects that can get the benefits from the sale of certified emission reductions for the carbon market; it seeks to achieve a harmony between the state, communities and businesses. |
(vii) |
The development of industry and use of natural gas; it proposes to promote the substitution of oil-derived fuels for the use of natural gas and liquefied petroleum gasLPGin the industry and transportation, mass use of natural gas through decentralized distribution systems. It also considers |
F-136
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
fostering the development of the petrochemical industry and promoting the development of a polyduct network and strengthening the system of hydrocarbons transport and storage according to the countrys growth. |
(viii) | Institutional strengthening and transparency in the sector; it establishes the need to act and promote transparency in the activities of the sector and to ensure legal stability that allows to boost energy development in the long term. It also considers the promotion of research, development and technological innovation in the energy sector, among other points. |
(ix) | Regional energy integration with a long-term vision; establishes the need to continuously identify the benefits of energy integration, entering into agreements leading gradually to market integration. |
Through Ministerial Resolution 203-2013-MEM/DM, published on May 28, 2013, the Ministry of Energy and Mines approved the Plan for Universal Access to Energy 2013-2022. It identifies two key priorities in the global energy sector:
(i) | Universal access to energy, which defines 100% access to basic human needs by year 2030 and is based on two objectives: |
| 100% access to basic human needs by year 2030, 100% access to electricity: lighting, communication, and community services. |
| 100% access to technologies and fuels for cooking and heating: improved stoves, natural gas, LPG, and biogas. |
(ii) | Improving energy efficiency. |
Access to energy is considered one of the pillars in the fight against poverty.
The objective of this plan is to promote, from the energy field, an efficient, environment-sustainable and fairly economic development, implementing projects that allow universal access to electricity supply, prioritizing the use of available power sources, with the objective to generate more and better quality of life for low-income populations.
Resources to implement the Plan for Universal Access to Energy will be: The Social Inclusion Energy Fund transfers to the public sector, external funding sources, contributions, allowances, grants, resources through agreements, and resources considered in the National Plan of Rural Electrification 2013-2022.
(p) Regulatory Contribution
As a consequence of the transfer of the environmental supervising, inspecting and sanctioning functions of OSINERGMIN to the Agency for Environmental Assessment and InspectionOEFAthrough Supreme Decree 127-2013-PCM and 129-2013-PCM, published on December 19, 2013, new regulatory contributions from energy entities and companies (Electricity and hydrocarbons) to OSINERGMIN and OEFA were established. These contributions are obtained as a result of applying the percentages established to the monthly billing, corresponding to transactions with third parties directly related to the controlled, regulated and monitored activity, deducting the sales tax and Municipal Promotion Tax.
F-137
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(3) Basis for the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements
(a) Statement of Compliance
The consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), in force as of that date.
(b) Information Responsibility
The information contained in these consolidated financial statements is the responsibility of the Companys Management which expressly states that all the principles and criteria included in the IFRSs issued by the IASB have been applied.
(c) Basis of Measurement
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the derivative financial instruments which are measured at fair value.
(d) Functional and Presentation Currency
The consolidated financial statements are presented in nuevos soles (S/.) which is the Companys and its Subsidiaries functional and presentation currency.
(e) Use of Estimates and Judgments
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the Company and Subsidiaries management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expense. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.
Resulting accounting estimates, very rarely will be the same as the respective actual results. However, in managements opinion, actual results will not vary significantly from estimates and assumptions applied by the Company and its Subsidiaries. The main accounting estimates made by management are the following:
| Useful life of property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets (see notes 4i and 4m). |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment (see note 4k). |
| The assumptions used to calculate the actuarial liabilities and obligations to employees, such as discount rates, mortality tables, salary increases, and others (see note 21). |
| The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of financial instruments (see notes 4d, 4e and 4f). |
F-138
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
| Energy supplied to customers and not invoiced at the closing of each period. |
| Certain assumptions inherent in the electricity system affecting transactions with other companies, such as production, customer billings, energy consumption, etc. that allow for estimating electricity system settlements that must occur on the corresponding final settlement dates, but that are pending as of the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements and could affect the balances of assets, liabilities, income and expenses recorded in the statements. |
| Likelihood of occurrence and the amount of liabilities of uncertain amount or contingent (see note 36). |
| Future disbursements for the closure of facilities and restoration of land (see note 4l). |
| Current and deferred taxes. |
Management has exercised its critical judgment when applying accounting policies for the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements, as explained in the corresponding accounting policies.
(f) Consolidated Financial Statements
These consolidated financial statements comprise the separate financial statements of Generandes Perú S.A. and the financial statements of its subsidiaries Edegel S.A.A. and Chinango S.A.C. as mentioned in note 1.
(i) Subsidiaries
The subsidiaries are all entities over which the Company has authority to govern their operating and financial policies generally for being holder of more than half of voting shares. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date on which their control is transferred to the Company. They are not consolidated from the date on which control ceases.
The Company uses the purchase method to record the acquisition of its subsidiary. The cost of acquisition is measured as the fair value of delivered assets, equity instruments issued, and liabilities incurred or assumed at the date of the exchange, plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are initially measured at fair value at the acquisition date. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the Companys interest in identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill in the assets.
If the cost is lower than the subsidiarys fair value of net assets (badwill), the difference is recognized directly in the consolidated statement of income.
Transactions, balances and unrealized gains among the companies that the Company controls are eliminated. Also, unrealized losses are eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of impairment in the value of the transferred assets.
(ii) Non-controlling Interest
Interests from third parties that are not part of the Company, if applicable, are shown as non-controlling interests under the equity in the consolidated statement of financial position and in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income.
F-139
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(4) Significant Accounting Policies
Main accounting principles applied in the preparation of consolidated financial statements are detailed below. The accounting policies set out below have been applied consistently to all periods presented, unless otherwise indicated.
(a) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, demand deposits in banks, and, other short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or shorter, with no significant risk of changes in its fair value.
(b) Trade Accounts Receivable and Estimate of Doubtful Accounts
Trade accounts receivable arises from sale of energy and power, which are billed in the month following dispatch of energy, recording dispatch of energy, and the estimated amount of unbilled energy provided in the month.
The balances of trade accounts receivable are initially recorded at their face value, net of the corresponding estimate of doubtful accounts.
Estimate for doubtful accounts is computed based on the evaluation made by management concerning credit risk of each client. If, based on the evaluation, management determines that a client shows a high credit risk, then management determines the amount of that should be estimated as doubtful account and charges it to profit and loss of the period when the need of recording such provision is determined.
Management considers that the procedure used allows estimating and recording the necessary provisions to appropriately cover the risk of loss in trade accounts receivable. Uncollectible accounts are written-off when identified.
(c) Inventories and Estimate of Inventory Obsolescence
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the weighted average method, except for inventories in transit in which cases the specific cost method is used. The net realizable value is the estimated selling price estimated in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
The estimate of inventory obsolescence is determined based on periodic technical studies on inventory obsolescence prepared by Management. This estimate is charged to the results of the fiscal period in which such deductions occur.
(d) Non-derivative Financial Instruments
Non-derivative financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to both a financial asset in one entity and a financial liability, or equity instrument in another. In the case of the Company and its Subsidiaries, non-derivative financial instruments correspond to primary instruments such as accounts receivable and accounts payable.
F-140
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Non-derivative financial instruments are classified as asset, liability, or equity according to the substance of the contract that gave rise to the financial instrument.
The interest, dividends, gains, and losses generated by a financial instrument, and classified as liability, are recorded as income or expense in the statement of income. The payment to holders of financial instruments classified as equity is recorded directly against stockholders equity. The financial instruments are compensated when the Company and its Subsidiaries have the legal right to compensate them, and management has the intention of paying them on a net basis or negotiating the asset, and paying the liability simultaneously.
Non-derivative financial instruments shall be recognized in the financial statements at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
In managements opinion, the carrying amount of non-derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are substantially similar to their fair values due to their short periods of realization and/or maturity or are subject to variable and fixed interest rate similar to those used in the market.
(e) Hedging of Non-Derivative Instruments
If there is a high level of correlation between revenues and exchange rate variations in U.S. dollars, the Company will be subject to an exchange rate risk for future cash flows. IAS 39 allows hedging these revenues through financing in this currency. Exchange differences of this debt, concerning cash flow hedging operations, are recorded, net of its tax effect, in a hedging account, and are recorded in the income statement in the term when hedged cash flows will be realized. This term has been estimated in ten years.
(f) Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedge Accounting
Derivative instruments are recorded in conformity with IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement .
Financial derivative contracts for which the Company and its Subsidiaries have established a cash flow hedging relationship are recorded as assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and presented at their fair value.
When a derivative is designated as a cash flow hedging instrument, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized in other comprehensive income and accumulated in the hedging reserve.
Any ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
(g) Financial Assets
The Company and its Subsidiaries classify its financial assets in the following categories: i) financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, ii) loans and accounts receivable, iii) held-to-maturity financial assets, and iv) available-for-sale financial assets. The classification depends on the purpose for which investments were acquired. Management determines the classification of their financial assets as of the date of their initial recognition and reassesses this classification as of every closing date.
F-141
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial Assets at Fair Value through Profit or Loss
A financial asset is classified in this category if it was mainly acquired in order to be sold in the short-term or if it is so designated by Management. Derivative financial instruments are also classified as marketable unless they are designated as hedges. Assets under this category are classified as current assets if they are held as marketable or they are expected to be realized within 12 months as from the date of the consolidated statement of financial position. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company and its Subsidiaries did not hold any financial asset under this category.
Loans and Accounts Receivable
Loans and accounts receivable are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise when the Company and its Subsidiaries provide with money, goods or services directly to a debtor, with no intention to trading the account receivable. They are included in current assets, except for maturities exceeding 12 months after the date of the statement of financial position. The latter are classified as non-current assets. Loans and accounts receivable are included in trade accounts receivable and other accounts receivable in the consolidated statement of financial position (note 7, 8 and 9).
Loans and accounts receivable are initially recognized on the date when they are originated.
The Company derecognizes a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or it transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows in a transaction in which substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred, or it neither transfers nor retains substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership and does not retain control over the transferred asset. Any interest in such derecognized financial assets that is created or retained by the Company is recognized as a separate asset or liability.
These assets are initially recognized at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
These assets are evaluated at each reporting date to determine whether there is objective evidence of impairment.
Held-to-Maturity Financial Assets
Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities acquired with the Companys Management intention and ability to hold them to maturity. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company and its Subsidiaries did not hold any financial asset under this category.
Available-for-sale financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets designated in this category or that do not classify in any of the other categories. These assets are shown as non-current assets unless Management has express intention to sell the investment within 12 months as of the date of the statement of financial position. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company and its Subsidiaries did not hold any financial asset under this category.
F-142
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company and its Subsidiaries evaluate at each date of the consolidated statement of financial position whether there is objective evidence of the impairment of a financial asset or group of financial assets.
(h) Investments in Associate
Associates are those entities in which the Company and its Subsidiaries have significant influence, but not control; as in the case of the investment that the subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. has in Endesa Brasil S.A. which is part of Enel Group.
Edegel S.A.A. records its investment in Endesa Brasil S.A. under the equity method, recognizing, in the consolidated financial statements, changes in the results and the equity of the associate, on a proportion basis to the Subsidiarys interest.
Also, because the functional currency of the associate is different from the subsidiary Edegel S.A.A.s, the effect of translating the balances into Peruvian nuevos soles as presentation currency shall be recognized, i.e. , balances of the statement of financial position are translated at the closing exchange rates of each year and the results at average exchange rate; recording any difference under other reserves in the equity. Dividends received from the associate are recorded as a decrease in the investment value.
(i) Property, Plant, and Equipment
Properties, plant and equipment are recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Also, this item includes the net cost of leased goods and spare parts acquired for major inspections of power plants. When the assets are sold or disposed, their cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated, and any gain or loss resulting from their disposal is included in the consolidated statement of income.
The initial cost of property, plant, and equipment comprises their purchase price, including non-reimbursable customs fees and purchase taxes as well as any other directly attributable cost of bringing the asset to its working condition and for its intended use, and the estimate of the initial decommissioning costs. Costs incurred after fixed assets starts operating are recognized as assets provided that: (i) it is probable that future economic benefits embodied within the asset will flow to the Company, and (ii) the cost of the asset can be measured reliably. Routine repairs and maintenance of property, plant and equipment are charged to the statement of income in the period in which they are incurred.
Assets under construction are capitalized as a separate component. By the end, the cost of these assets are transferred to a definitive category: Works-in-progress are not depreciated.
Land is not depreciated. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful life of the asset that are:
Years |
||||
Buildings and other constructions |
45 | |||
Plant and equipment |
18 | |||
Furniture and fixtures |
9 | |||
Various equipment |
7 | |||
Vehicles |
5 |
F-143
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Residual value, useful life and depreciation methods are periodically reviewed and adjusted by management according to the forecasted economic benefits to be provided by the components of property, plant, and equipment.
(j) Finance Lease
The Company and its Subsidiaries recognize finance lease recording assets and liabilities, in the consolidated statement of financial position, at an amount equal to the fair value of the leased assets. Initial direct costs are considered as part of the asset. Finance lease payments should be apportioned between the finance charge and the reduction of the liability. The finance charge is apportioned over the lease term.
Finance lease generates asset depreciation expenses and debt financing costs in each accounting period. The depreciation policy for assets held under finance leases is consistent with that for other assets of property, plant and equipment of the Company and its Subsidiaries.
(k) Impairment Loss
Throughout the year, and especially at year-end close, the Company and its Subsidiary review whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the assets recoverable amount is estimated to determine the impaired amount. In the cases of identifiable assets that do not generate cash flows independently, estimation is made on the recoverability of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs, understanding as such the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates independent cash inflows.
Regardless of the preceding paragraph, in the case of cash-generating units to which acquired goodwill or intangible assets have been allocated with an indefinite useful life, the recoverability analysis is performed systematically at the closing of each period.
The recoverable amount of an asset is the greater of its market value less costs to sell and value in use, this being understood as the present value of estimated future cash flows. For the calculation of the salvage value of property, plant and equipment, of acquired goodwill, of intangible assets, the value in use is the criteria used by the Company and its Subsidiaries in all the cases.
To estimate the value in use, the Company and its Subsidiary prepare future cash flow projections based on most recent budget available. These budgets include the best estimates of Management on revenues and costs of the cash-generating units based on industry projections, past experience and future expectations.
These projections cover the next five years, estimating cash flows for the following years by applying growth rates of 3.44% which does not exceed the average long-term growth rate for the sector and for the country.
These flows are discounted to calculate their present value at a rate that reflects the capital cost of the business and the geographical area in which it operates. For its calculation, it takes into account the current cost of money and the risk premiums generally used by analysts for the business and geographic area. The discount rate applied at 2014 year-end was 7.5%.
The assumptions used to determine the value in use as of December 31, 2014 do not present major changes compared to those as of December 31, 2013.
When there is an indication that the impairment loss no longer exists or has decreased, the reversal of losses is recorded in the consolidated statement of income.
F-144
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(l) Provision for Decommissioning of Power Plants
Liabilities for decommissioning are recognized when the Company and its Subsidiaries are required to dismantle and remove facilities to restore the site where the plants are located, and when a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Removal costs are recorded at the present value of estimated future expenditure determined in accordance with local requirements and conditions, which are periodically reviewed, including the discount rate used to calculate the present value. Initially, the amount of fixed assets is recognized by an amount equivalent to the provision. Subsequently, this amount will be depreciated as well as the items of fixed assets. Any change in the present value of the estimated expenditure is reflected as an adjustment to the provision and value of the corresponding asset. The changes over time in the provision are recorded as finance cost in profit or loss of the period.
(m) Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are initially recorded at cost. Assets can be recognized as intangible if their cost can be reliably measured and it is probable that future economic benefits embodied within the asset will flow to the Company and its Subsidiaries. After initial recognition, intangible assets are accounted for at cost less accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses.
Useful life and amortization method are periodically reviewed by the Companys management according to the forecast economic benefits to be provided by the components of intangible asset items.
Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful life of the asset.
Years |
||||
Concessions and rights |
21 - 30 | |||
Software |
3 - 10 |
(n) Financial Liabilities
Financial liabilities are initially recognized at their fair value, net of incurred transaction costs. These liabilities are subsequently recorded at their amortized cost, and any resulting difference between the funds received (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognized in the consolidated statement of income over the obligation using the effective interest method.
Financial liabilities are classified as current liability unless the Company and its Subsidiaries have the unconditional right to differ settlement of the liability for at least twelve months after the consolidated statement of financial position.
(o) Bonds
The obligation to issue bonds is recorded at its par value. Commissions and interests are recorded in the results of the fiscal period, when accrued.
(p) Income tax
Current income tax
Current tax comprises the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year and any adjustment to the tax payable or receivable in respect of previous years. It is measured using tax rates that have been approved as of the date of the consolidated statement of financial position (note 34).
F-145
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Deferred income tax
Deferred tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.
Deferred income tax asset and liability are recognized without considering the estimated time when the temporary differences will disappear. Income tax asset is only recognized so far as it is probable that there will be future tax benefits, so that the asset can be used.
Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to the applied to temporary differences when they reverse, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
(q) Workers Profit Sharing
Workers profit sharing is determined using the same criteria used to determine the current income tax. Workers profit sharing rate applicable to the subsidiary Edegel S.A.A is 5%.
(r) Provisions
Provisions are recognized when the Company and its subsidiaries have a present obligation (legal or constructive), as a result of past events, and when it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and it is possible to reliably estimate its amount. When the Company expects a provision or part of it is refundable, the reimbursement is recognized only if it is assured that it will be obtained.
Provisions are reviewed and adjusted in each period to reflect the best estimates as of the date of the statement of financial position.
When the effect of the time value of money is material, the value of the provision is the present value of the expenditure required to settle the provision.
(s) Contingent Liabilities and Assets
Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the financial statements. They are disclosed in notes to financial statements unless the possibility of an outflow of economic resources is remote. In this case, they are not disclosed in the notes.
Contingent assets are not recognized in financial statements, and they are only disclosed in notes when an inflow of economic benefits is probable.
(t) Revenue, Cost and Expense Recognition
Revenue from rendering of services and interest are recognized to the extent that it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Company.
Revenues from sales of energy and power delivered but not invoiced are recognized as revenue in the month in which the service is provided based on estimates made by management and are billed in the month following the release of energy.
F-146
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The following criteria shall be met in order to recognize revenues:
Sale of energy and power fees
Sales of energy are computed based on cyclical readings and are completely recognized in the period when service is rendered. Revenues from the sale of energy delivered but not invoiced between the last cyclical reading and the end of each month is computed based on estimates of energy consumed by users of the service during the deferred period.
Interest income
Interest is recognized on a time proportion basis to reflect the effective yield of assets.
Acquisition costs of fuel, energy and tolls are recognized when accrued.
Expenses are recognized on an accrual basis and are recorded in the periods to which they relate.
(u) Costs of Financial Liabilities
Costs of financial liabilities are recorded as expense when accrued. Costs are capitalized if directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset. Capitalization of costs of financial liabilities begins when activities to prepare the asset are being carried out and expenses and costs for the loans are being incurred. Capitalization of interest is made until assets are ready for their intended use. If the resulting value of asset exceeds its recoverable amount, it shall be recorded as an impairment loss.
Costs of financial liabilities comprise interest expense and other costs incurred related to borrowings, exchange differences arising from borrowings in foreign currency used to finance projects, since they correspond to an adjustment of interest costs.
(v) Earnings per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share are determined by dividing the net earnings attributable to majority stockholders by the weighted-average number of outstanding subscribed and paid-in ordinary shares as of the date of the consolidated statement of financial position (note 33).
Diluted earnings per share correspond to the basic earnings per share, adjusted for the dilutive effects of shares coming from the conversion of bonds or convertible shares, among others. As of December 2014, and 2013, the Company and its Subsidiaries do not have financial instruments with dilutive effects; therefore, basic and diluted earnings per share are the same.
(w) Foreign Currency Transactions and Balances
Foreign currency transactions are those transactions carried out in a currency other than the functional currency. Foreign currency transactions are translated into functional currency at exchange rates ruling at the dates of the transactions.
The Company and its Subsidiaries have established a hedging policy for the portion of revenues that are directly linked to the performance of the U.S. dollar, by obtaining funding in this currency. Exchange differences on this debt, as being hedging cash flows, are recognized net of tax effect, in a reserve account in equity and recorded in the statement of income in the period in which hedged cash flows will be realized. This period has been estimated at ten years.
F-147
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(x) Classification of Balances as Current and Non-Current
The statement of financial position presents balances classified according to their maturity, i.e. , as current in the case of those balances with maturities of twelve months or less, and non-current in the case of those balances with maturities of more than twelve months.
For obligations with maturities of less than twelve months, but whose long-term refinancing is assured at the Companys and its Subsidiarys discretion through unconditionally available long-term loan agreements, those could be classified as long-term liabilities.
(y) Fair value
The Company determines the fair value of financial instruments using valuation techniques. Fair values are categorized into different levels in a fair value hierarchy as follows:
Level 1: |
Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | |
Level 2: |
inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. | |
Level 3: |
inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data. |
(z) New Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
The following standards and interpretations have been published for application to periods beginning after this financial statement presentation date.
| Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 38 Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortization. This amendment introduces various restrictions to the use of revenue as a basis of depreciation and amortization. This amendment becomes obligatory for the Company on January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. |
| Amendments to IAS 19 Employee Benefits - Employee Contributions aims at simplifying accounting of contributions that are independent of the years of service of the employee. Amendment is obligatory for annual periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014. The Company has not opted for early adoption. |
| IFRS 9 Financial Instruments , replaces guidelines to IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement IFRS 9 includes guidelines reviewed for the classification and measurement of financial instruments, including a new model of expected credit losses to calculate the impairment of financial assets and the new general requirements for hedge accounting. It also maintains the guidelines related to the recognition and derecognition of financial instruments of IAS 39. The Company will assess the full impact of IFRS 9 and plans to adopt IFRS 9 by the accounting period beginning on January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. |
| IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers , establishes a comprehensive framework for determining when to recognize revenue and how much revenue to recognize. It replaces the current guidelines for the recognition of revenues including IAS 18 Revenue , IAS 11 Construction Contracts and IFRIC 13 Customer Loyalty Programme. The amendment becomes mandatory for the Company since the accounting period beginning on or after January 1, 2017, with early adoption permitted. |
F-148
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
| Amendments to IFRS 11 Accounting for Acquisitions of Interests in Joint Operations states that the acquirer of an interest in a joint operation in which the activity constitutes a business, as defined in IFRS 3 Business Combinations , is required to apply all of the principles on business combinations accounting in IFRS 3. Amendment is obligatory for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. |
| IFRS 14 Regulatory Deferral Accounts specifies financial information requirements for regulatory deferral account balances that arise when an entity provides goods or services to clients at a price or rate subject to regulation. The amendment becomes mandatory for the Company since the accounting period beginning on or after January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. |
The Companys and its subsidiaries management is evaluating the impact, if any, of the adoption of these amendments and new International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) issued but not yet effective as of the date of the consolidated financial statements.
(5) Financial Risk Management
The Companys and its Subsidiarys activities are exposed to a variety of financial risks whose potential effects are permanently evaluated by the Companys management in order to minimize exposures. Financial risks are market risks (including the currency risk, price risk, and interest rate risk), credit risk, liquidity risk, and capital management.
Risk management is conducted by the Management. It identifies, evaluates and decides, if appropriate, on the contracting of financial risk hedging based on the Board of Directors guidelines.
(a) Currency risk
The Companys and its subsidiaries activities expose it to exchange rate fluctuation risk concerning the Nuevo Sol with respect to U.S. dollars.
Balances in thousands of U.S. dollars (US$) of asset and liability items as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 are summarized as follows:
In thousands of US$ |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
34,973 | 22,552 | ||||||
Trade accounts receivable, net |
10,071 | 2,357 | ||||||
Other accounts receivable, net |
1,085 | 652 | ||||||
Accounts receivable from related parties |
| 9,370 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
46,129 | 34,931 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
1,910 | 14,644 | ||||||
Financial liabilities, including current portion |
254,084 | 241,077 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
255,994 | 255,721 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liability position, net |
209,865 | 220,790 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
These balances as of December 31, 2014, have been stated in Nuevos Soles at the closing Exchange rate of S/. 2.989 (S/. 2.796 as of December 31, 2013).
F-149
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Risk hedge policies of exchange rate is prepared based on projected cash flows and considers maintaining a balance between flows indexed to US$ and level of assets and liabilities in such currency. The objective is to minimize the flow exposure to the risk of variations in the exchange rate.
(b) Interest Rate Risk
Since the Company and its Subsidiaries do not have significant interest-bearing assets; their income and operating cash flows are substantially independent from changes in the market interest rates. The Companys and its Subsidiarys exposure to this risk is basically generated by their financial obligations.
If, as of December 31, 2014, interest rates over indebtedness in U.S dollars had been 0.5% higher/lower (in absolute terms) and all the other variables had remained constant, the results for the year after taxes would have been:
Period |
Increase/decrease
|
Effects on gain
in thousands of S/. |
||||||
2014 |
+0.5 | % | 598 | |||||
2014 |
-0.5 | % | (598 | ) | ||||
2013 |
+0.5 | % | 480 | |||||
2013 |
-0.5 | % | (480 | ) |
Funding variable rates might expose the Company and its Subsidiary to the cash flow interest rate risk. The Company and its Subsidiary minimize this risk contracting financial liabilities mainly at fixed interest rates in the medium- and long-term.
The portion of financial obligations at fixed rate or hedged as of December 31, 2014 is 49% (67% as of December 31, 2013), and the Company and its Subsidiaries consider that it will not affect the risk of interest rate fluctuations, since they are within the appropriate range over which the debt structure at fixed and variable rates are managed.
Fixed-rate debts might expose the Company and its Subsidiary to interest rate risk on fair value of liabilities. The Companys management considers that this risk is not significant because interest rates applied to its financing contracts do not differ significantly from market interest rates which are available to the Company and its Subsidiary for similar financial instruments.
Management considers that future fluctuations in the interest rates will not significantly affect the results of the future operations.
(c) Credit risks
The Companys and its Subsidiarys financial assets potentially exposed to credit risk concentrations are mainly bank deposits and accounts receivable presented in the consolidated statement of financial position.
The Company and its Subsidiary only invest their cash surplus in financial institutions with local investment grade rating.
On the other hand, the credit risk relating to accounts receivable from trading activity, is historically fairly low given the short term for collection from customers, which avoid individual accumulations of significant amounts.
F-150
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The Companys and its Subsidiarys Management periodically evaluates the credit risk of its client portfolio, based on a methodology designed by its parent company, which takes into account factors such as liquidity, indebtedness, profitability, age of business, payment behavior, criminal records, among others.
(d) Liquidity risks
Liquidity is controlled by the balancing of the maturities of assets and liabilities, keeping a proper number of financing sources, and obtaining credit lines that enable the normal development of its activities. The Company and its Subsidiary have an appropriate level of resources and keep financing lines with banking entities.
Management permanently monitors its liquidity reserves, based on cash flow projections.
The table below analyzes the financial liabilities of the Company and its Subsidiary as of the date of the consolidated statement of financial position, classified according to the contractually established maturities:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
Less than
|
1 to 2
|
2 to 3
|
3 to 5
|
5 to 10
|
Over 10
|
||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds |
24,718 | 59,780 | | 79,298 | 54,890 | 29,890 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank loans |
53,494 | 190,322 | 87,949 | 81,346 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance lease |
41,620 | 41,469 | 68,435 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
209,956 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accounts payable to related parties |
30,686 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accounts payable |
88,996 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
449,470 | 291,571 | 156,384 | 160,644 | 54,890 | 29,890 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
Less than
|
1 to 2
|
2 to 3
|
3 to 5
|
5 to 10
|
Over 10
|
||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds |
107,938 | 17,762 | 55,900 | 27,950 | 100,774 | 27,950 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank loans |
29,095 | 44,692 | 72,642 | 147,716 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance lease |
28,482 | 38,777 | 38,777 | 66,059 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
293,090 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accounts payable to related parties |
4,489 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accounts payable |
71,982 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
535,076 | 101,231 | 167,319 | 241,725 | 100,774 | 27,950 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management monitors the risk associated with each of the above mentioned categories, which includes maintaining good relationships with financial institutions in order to assure sufficient credit lines at all times, as well as covering its working capital with cash flows coming from operating activities.
As of December 31, 2014, the Company and its Subsidiaries present liquidity of S/. 238,427 (S/. 172,907 thousand as of December 31, 2013) in cash and other equivalent means and S/. 439,118 thousand in available credit lines (S/. 392,623 thousand as of December 31, 2013).
F-151
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Therefore, in managements opinion, there is no significant liquidity risk as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
(e) Fair Value Estimate
Management estimates that the carrying amounts of financial instruments current as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 do not differ significantly from their fair values due to their short-term maturity; therefore, disclosure of such information is not relevant for an appropriate interpretation of the Companys financial position and its Subsidiary as of those dates, and in the case of the non-current financial obligations, because it accrues interest at market rates.
To calculate the fair value of different derivative instruments, the Company and its Subsidiaries use for their valuation the discounted expected cash flows and generally accepted valuation models based on both cash and future market conditions at the closing date of the period.
(e.1) The detail of financial instruments, assets, classified by nature and category as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
F-152
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(e.2) The detail of financial instruments, assets, classified by nature and category as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:
(6) Cash and Cash Equivalents
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Cash |
52 | 40 | ||||||
Checking accounts (a) |
127,305 | 68,833 | ||||||
Time deposits (b) |
111,070 | 104,034 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
238,427 | 172,907 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | The Company and its Subsidiaries have checking accounts in local and foreign currency in different local banks, their funds are freely available, and bear interest at market rates. |
F-153
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) | As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company and its Subsidiaries held time deposits in the following financial institutions: |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Banco BBVA Continental |
41,200 | 40,800 | ||||||
Banco Interbank |
25,300 | 26,500 | ||||||
Banco de Crédito del Perú |
44,570 | 36,734 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
111,070 | 104,034 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2014 time deposits have original maturities between 2 and 28 days and as of December 31, 2013 between 2 and 25 days.
(7) Trade Accounts Receivable
This item comprises the following:
(d) | Accounts receivable are mainly stated in nuevos soles, have current maturity, and do not accrue interest. Balance of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, corresponds to 73 and 69 customers, respectively. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company and its Subsidiaries did not hold past due trade accounts receivable. |
(e) | Balance of trade accounts receivable as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, includes an amount of S/. 6,642 thousand (S/. 11,887 thousand as of December 31, 2013) which corresponds to withdrawals of energy and power without contractual support made by distribution companies between years 2006 to 2007, which were assigned to subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. by Comité de Operación Económica del Sistema Interconectado Nacional COES-SINAC (Economical Operation Committee of the National Interconnected System. Those withdrawals are valued at bus-bar tariffs and their invoicing is pending. In the opinion of management, those accounts receivable will be fully recovered. |
F-154
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(8) Related Party Transactions
Detail of movement of accounts receivable from related parties is as follows:
Detail of movement of accounts payable to related parties is as follows:
(a) | Accounts receivable and payable to related parties do not accrue interest and do not have specific maturity or guarantees, except for those trade accounts receivable corresponding to sale of energy and power which have a 10-day maturity in average. |
(b) | They correspond to dividends declared and paid by the Company and its subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. |
F-155
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(c) | The following table summarizes the related party transactions which had an impact on the profit or loss of the period: |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||||||
Revenue |
Expenses |
Revenue |
Expenses |
|||||||||||||
Sale of energy, power and toll (note 25) |
377,233 | | 457,249 | | ||||||||||||
Purchase of energy, power, toll and other (note 26) |
| 14,805 | | 5,403 | ||||||||||||
Administrative services to related parties (notes 30 and 27) |
4,107 | 2,412 | 3,021 | 1,442 | ||||||||||||
Other services (notes 25, 26 & 27) |
76 | 189 | 135 | 780 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
381,416 | 17,406 | 460,405 | 7,625 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no balances receivable and payable between the Company and its Subsidiaries, its Directors and Management.
(d) | Remunerations accrued by Directors and key Management Personnel amount to: |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Directors |
474 | 505 | ||||||
Managers |
6,028 | 7,067 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
6,502 | 7,572 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(9) Other Accounts Receivable
This caption comprises the following:
(a) | As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, it corresponds mainly to the estimate of the indemnification of the insurance company according to the policy coverage subscribed for loss occurred at subsidiary Edegel in Unit TG7 and subsidiary Chinango in Unite G1 of the Chimay plant (notes 13 (g) and 30). In April and August 2014, subsidiary Edegel collected from the insurance company the amount of S/. 86,681 thousand, while in December 2014, subsidiary Chinango collected from the insurance company the amount of S/. 10,462 thousand. |
(b) | In opinion of the Company and its subsidiaries Management, the balance of the estimate for doubtful accounts appropriately covers the credit risk of other doubtful accounts receivable as of December 31, 2014, and 2013. |
F-156
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(10) Inventories
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Maintenance materials |
52,487 | 49,984 | ||||||
Oil |
17,850 | 17,788 | ||||||
Materials in transit |
789 | 72 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
71,126 | 67,844 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | During 2014, inventories decreased by S/. 8,185 thousand at their net realizable value (by S/. 7,739 thousand in 2013). |
(11) Other Non-Financial Assets
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Prepaid insurances |
21,240 | 20,083 | ||||||
Other |
1,104 | 889 | ||||||
Advances |
121 | 1,294 | ||||||
Income tax assets |
1,757 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
24,222 | 22,266 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(12) Investments
It comprises investment in Associate:
Effective shareholding
|
In thousands of S/. |
|||||||||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||||
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
3.997 | 3.997 | 236,788 | 260,382 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | It corresponds to 6,957,053 common shares of Endesa Brasil S.A., a company incorporated in Brazil where subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. holds an effective shareholding of 3.9966% in capital stock as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
(b) | The movement of this item for the periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 was as follows: |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Opening balance |
260,382 | 259,771 | ||||||
Interest in the profit of the Associate |
27,707 | 54,728 | ||||||
Dividends declared |
(42,834 | ) | (55,675 | ) | ||||
Translation difference (c) |
(8,467 | ) | (1,080 | ) | ||||
Other movements in the Associate |
| 2,638 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Final balance |
236,788 | 260,382 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(c) | They correspond to the equity share value resulting from the translation of the financial statements of Endesa Brasil S.A., from real (functional currency) to nuevos soles for reporting purposes and inclusion in the consolidated financial statements. |
F-157
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(13) Property, Plant and Equipment
(a) | This caption comprises the following: |
F-158
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(d) | Property, plant and equipment includes interest and other capitalized finance costs related to construction of works-in-progress, as per the indicated criteria (notes 4u). |
(e) | For periods ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, no interest were capitalized. |
(f) | As of December 31, 2014, property, plant and equipment includes spares parts for S/. 87,568 thousand (S/. 116,623 thousand as of December 31, 2013) to be exclusively used in generating units. |
(g) | The item includes assets for the extension of the Santa Rosa Thermal Plant (Santa Rosa II) that were acquired by subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. through finance lease contracts (note 19(e)) and became operative in September 2009. As of December 31, 2014, the net carrying amount of assets acquired for the construction, installation, implementation and commissioning of such generating unit amounts to S/. 185,588 thousand (S/. 201,021 thousand, as of December 31, 2013) from which S/. 32,523 thousand, correspond to buildings and other constructions (S/. 34,172 thousand as of December 31, 2013) and S/. 153,065 thousand to plant and equipment (S/. 166,849 thousand as of December 31, 2013). |
(h) | The Company and its Subsidiaries transferred a trust equity, the legal ownership of plant and equipment of the Combined Cycle with the intention that it serves as guarantee of payment of obligations assumed by the financing of the conversion of the Thermoelectric Plant from Ventanilla to Combined Cycle. The trust agreement is terminated as of December 31, 2013. |
(i) | In May 2013, a loss occurred in the Thermal Plant Santa Rosa that affected certain items of assets belonging to Unit TG7, supporting unit. Due to this loss, the Subsidiary recorded an estimate of impairment of plant and equipment amounting to S/. 36,006 thousand (note 26), that corresponded to the decrease in the carrying amount at the recoverable value of Unit TG7. The estimate of impairment was applied to items of assets belonging to Unit TG7 affected by the loss. As of December 31, 2013, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. began to remove the items affected by the loss. |
F-159
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2014, the Company and its Subsidiaries has estimated the net outstanding reimbursement of the advances received from the insurance company for material damages in S/. 27,931 thousand and for loss of income in S/. 24,813 thousand (notes 9 and 30). |
In December 2013, there was a claim in the Subsidiary at the Chimay plant which affected certain elements of the assets belonging to the Unit G1. Due to this claim, the Subsidiary derecognized those elements for S/. 3,954 thousand. |
As of December 31, 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. has estimated the outstanding reimbursement net of the advances received from the insurance company for material damages in S/. 3,756 thousand (note 9). |
In May 2014, a loss occurred in the Chimay plant of its subsidiary Chinango that affected certain items of the assets belonging to Unit G2, an estimate of impairment of plant and equipment amounting to S/. 1,963 thousand that corresponded to the decrease in the carrying amount at the recoverable value of Unit G2. The estimate of impairment was applied to items of assets belonging to Unit G2 affected by the loss. |
(j) | The Company and its Subsidiaries have insured their main assets, according to policies established by management. In that sense, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company and its Subsidiary have insured property, plant and equipment for up to an amount of US$ 1,876,208 thousand. It is the managements opinion that its insurance policies are consistent with the industry practice, and that the risk of possible losses for claims considered in the insurance policies is reasonable, taking into consideration the Companys and its Subsidiaries type of assets. |
F-160
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(14) Intangible Assets
This caption comprises the following:
(a) | The concessions and rights include the Huascacocha project which allows subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. having a higher water flow for the development of power generation activities. |
(15) Financial Liabilities
This caption comprises the following:
F-161
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(16) Trade Accounts Payable
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Supply, gas transport and distribution |
26,606 | 26,402 | ||||||
Maintenance agreement with Siemens S.A. (a) |
36,216 | 62,637 | ||||||
Purchase of energy, power and toll (a) |
39,884 | 18,168 | ||||||
Providers of work-in-progress (b) |
85,559 | 151,866 | ||||||
Others |
21,691 | 34,017 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
209,956 | 293,090 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | They correspond to goods and services delivered by Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation and Siemens Westinghouse Service Company Ltd. by virtue of the long-term service agreements LTSA for acquisition of replacement parts and rendering of scheduled maintenance services (minor and major) for turbines of Ventanilla and Santa Rosa thermal plants. As established in the agreement (note 35e), such amounts shall be paid based on the hours of operation of thermal plants. |
(b) | As of December 31, 2013, they include works-in-progress related to the replacement of items affected by the loss occurred in Unit TG7 (note 13 (g)) for an amount of S/. 72,416 thousand. As of December 31, 2014, there is no balance for this concept. |
(17) Other Accounts Payable
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Sales tax payable |
17,105 | 4,429 | ||||||
Taxes payable |
3,434 | 3,506 | ||||||
Remunerations payable |
5,655 | 5,136 | ||||||
Workers profit sharing |
14,340 | 13,407 | ||||||
Insurances payable |
25,537 | 28,124 | ||||||
Contributions to regulating entities |
6,548 | 6,294 | ||||||
Social inclusion energy fund |
9,433 | 5,082 | ||||||
Various |
6,944 | 6,004 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
88,996 | 71,982 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
F-162
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(18) Provisions
This caption comprises the following:
F-163
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(19) Financial Liabilities
(a) | This caption comprises the following: |
(*) | The current portion of long-term liabilities includes debt interest accrued and unpaid as of the date of the consolidated statement of financial position. |
F-164
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) | Composition of bond debts is presented as follows: |
(*) | The current portion of debt for bonds includes interest accrued and unpaid as of the date of the consolidated statement of financial position. |
F-165
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(c) | As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the main obligations that shall be complied by the Subsidiaries related to bond programs are as follows: |
Third, Fourth, Fifth Edegel Bond Programs
During the term of the bond issued within the Framework of the Third and Fourth Bond Program, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. shall maintain a debt ratio not greater than 1.5 times. This debt ratio is calculated as the ratio of the consolidated financial debt (net of cash for up to US$ 50,000 thousand) to the equity.
In the opinion of management, this obligation does not limit or affect the operations of the Subsidiary and are being met satisfactorily.
On September 23, 2013, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. registered its Fifth Corporate Bond Program in the Public Registry of Stock Market for an amount of US$ 350,000 thousand and for which no financial indicators have been established.
First Chinango Bond Program
The debt related to the First Chinango Bond Program was part of the net assets that subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. transferred to subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. under the simple reorganization carried out on May 31, 2009. The transfer of the Chinango S.A.C.s bonds was approved at General Bondholders Meeting held in May 2009. The transferred bonds have a joint collateral of subsidiary Edegel S.A.A.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the main restriction applicable to subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. during the term of the bonds issued within the First Bond Program, consisted of maintaining a debt ratio not greater than 1.5 times. This ratio was calculated as the debt-to-equity ratio of subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. In order to make such calculation, no liability for deferred income tax is considered.
In January 2014, the 13th issuance of Series B of the First Chinango Bond Program was paid off.
Compliance with the obligations over the term of the bond was supervised by the Companys and its Subsidiaries management and in its opinion, such obligations have been complied as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
(d) | On September 11, 2014, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. signed with Bank of Nova Scotia a financing contract amounting to US$ 36,000 thousand for a 1.5-year term. Funds were used to pay off financial obligations and working capital. |
(e) | On September 30, 2010, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. signed with BBVA Banco Continental a financing contract amounting to US$ 61,000 thousand for a 7-year term. The funds were used to pay three promissory notes with Banco Continental for a total amount of S/. 74,000 thousand and to offset the C.O.F installment with maturity in year 2012. |
(f) | On March 25, 2008, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. signed with Scotiabank Perú S.A.A. a finance lease contract for an amount of US$ 90,000 thousand for the construction of an open-cycle plant, for a 9-year term, in Santa Rosa Thermal Plant (TG8 Unit) and associated systems. The final amount disbursed under this contract amounted to US$ 84,330 thousand. |
F-166
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(g) | In February 2011, subsidiary Chinango signed with Scotiabank Perú S.A.A. a financing contract amounting to US$ 31,000 thousand for a seven-year term. Funds were used to pay two (2) short-term promissory notes with Banco de Crédito for a total of US$ 21,000 thousand and a promissory note with Banco Continental for S/. 29,400 thousand maturing in year 2012. |
(h) | In November 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. signed with Bank of Nova Scotia a financing contract amounting to US$ 10,000 thousand for a 5-year term. The funds were used to pay off part of a bond of First Chinango Bond Program maturing in year 2012. |
(i) | In January 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. signed with Bank of Nova Scotia a financing contract amounting to US$ 8,000 thousand for a 5-year term. The funds were used to pay off part of a bond of the 13th issuance, Series B of the First Chinango Bond Program maturing in year 2014. |
(j) | The main obligations that subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. shall comply under the long- term bank contracts consist of: (i) maintaining a debt ratio not greater than 1.5 measured as the ratio of the consolidated financial debt, and (ii) maintaining a financial debt ratio over EBITDA of at the most 4 times. |
Compliance with these obligations is supervised by the Companys and its Subsidiaries management of and in its opinion, such obligations have been complied as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
F-167
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(20) Hedging Derivative Instruments
(a) | The structure of the derivative instruments as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows: |
F-168
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||
12.31.2014 |
12.31.2013 |
|||||||||||||||
Assets |
Liabilities |
Assets |
Liabilities |
|||||||||||||
Per maturity |
||||||||||||||||
Current |
| 73 | 646 | 98 | ||||||||||||
Non-current |
80 | 2,871 | 36 | 4,751 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
80 | 2,944 | 682 | 4,849 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of hedge instruments is presented on the asset or liability, as applicable. Variations in the fair value of these instruments, net of its taxable effect, are recorded with a charge (credit) to the equity item other equity reserves.
Interest Rate Swap
The Subsidiaries pay and receive quarterly (at each payment date of protected debt interest) the difference between the LIBOR rate of the market applicable to the loan in such period and the fixed rate agreed on the hedging contracts. The flows effectively received and paid by the Subsidiaries are recognized as gain or loss for the period.
The Subsidiaries evaluate hedge effectiveness of each hedging derivative financial instrument at contracting date and have proven their effectiveness as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.
Currency Swap
These derivative financial instruments were hired by the Subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. in order to maintain an appropriate balance between expected cash flows in U.S. dollars (or indexed in dollars) and its financial obligations stated in that currency.
Through these instruments denominated Cross Currency Interest Rate Swap (CCIRS), subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. has exchanged its obligations in soles for obligations in dollars. In this sense, at each due date of the interest period of hedged debts, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. pays to the counterpart of the CCIRS the interest on the obligation in dollars at a rate agreed in the CCIRS contract and receives, in turn, the amount in nuevos soles necessary to meet the payment of the interest on the hedged debt in nuevos soles at a rate agreed with the corresponding the creditor.
In January 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. considered the currency swap as paid off.
The Subsidiaries evaluated hedge effectiveness of each hedging derivative financial instrument at contracting date and have proven their effectiveness during the term of the instruments.
F-169
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) | Financial derivatives contracted by the Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, their fair value and maturity breakdown, of the face or contractual values is detailed as follows: |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Face value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Before 1
|
1-2 years |
2-3 years |
3-4
|
4-5
|
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Interest rate swap |
(2,852 | ) | (22,997 | ) | (22,997 | ) | (40,702 | ) | | | (86,696 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Face value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Before 1
|
1-2 years |
2-3 years |
3-4 years |
4-5
|
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Interest rate swap |
(4,813 | ) | (13,804 | ) | (21,504 | ) | (21,504 | ) | (38,061 | ) | | (94,873 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
- Currency Swap |
646 | 24,535 | | | | | 24,535 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) | As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the payment schedule of the non-current portion of long-term financial liabilities is as follows: |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Year 2015 |
| 101,231 | ||||||
Year 2016 |
291,570 | 167,318 | ||||||
Year 2017 or more |
401,809 | 370,450 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
693,379 | 638,999 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(d) | Hedging Debt: |
As of December 31, 2014, from the debt in U.S. dollars of the Subsidiaries, the amount of S/. 759,457 thousand is related to the future cash flow hedge for the income from the Subsidiaries activities that are related to the U.S. dollar (note 4 (w)). As of December 31, 2013, it amounted to S/. 674,052 thousand.
The exchange difference generated for this debt is presented in the Statement of Changes in Equity in other equity reserves. The movement as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, net of its taxable effect, has been as follows:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Balance in net variation reserves for cash flow hedges at the beginning of the period |
37,919 | 89,571 | ||||||
Exchange differences recorded in equity |
(28,347 | ) | (40,982 | ) | ||||
Allocation of exchange differences to profit or loss |
(8,235 | ) | (10,670 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,337 | 37,919 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
F-170
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(21) Provision for Employee Benefits
The movement of this provision was as follows:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Opening balance |
3,394 | 3,586 | ||||||
Increase of the provision recorded against profit or loss |
923 | 262 | ||||||
Payments |
(407 | ) | (454 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
3,910 | 3,394 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. holds a covenant to grant employees an extraordinary bonus for severance payment, once the employee accumulates a period equivalent to five years of effective work.
(22) Deferred Income Tax
(a) | This caption comprises the following: |
F-171
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Due to the reduction of income tax, there has been a decrease in the period of S/. 94,900 thousand and S/. 870 thousand in deferred liabilities and assets, respectively, generating a gain of S/. 94,113 thousand, recorded in income tax in the consolidated statement of income (notes 34 and 36).
(b) | The composition of the deferred income tax in profit or loss was as follows: |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
For temporary differences on income determination |
(72,093 | ) | (38,952 | ) | ||||
For accrual of equity reserves |
15,294 | 22,136 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total income |
(56,799 | ) | (16,816 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
(23) Capital Management
The Companys and its Subsidiaries objective in managing capital is to safeguard the capacity to continue as a going concern and provide the expected return to stockholders and respective benefits to stakeholders, as well as maintaining an optimum structure to reduce capital cost.
The Company and its Subsidiaries may adjust the amount of dividends paid to stockholders, issue new shares or sell assets in order to reduce debt to maintain or adjust the capital structure.
F-172
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The calculation of the debt-to-equity ratio as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 was as follows:
(24) Equity
(a) Share Capital
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the share capital of the Company is represented by 853,429,020 common shares fully subscribed and paid-in with a par value of S/. 1.00 per share.
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the shareholding structure of the Company was as follows:
Stockholders |
Class of
|
Number of
|
% |
|||||||
Endesa Chile S.A. |
A | 520,578,464 | 61.00 | |||||||
Enersis S.A. |
B | 332,850,556 | 39.00 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
853,429,020 | 100.00 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
Both types of shares have the same rights and obligations.
(b) Other Capital Reserves
According to current legal rules, it is required to allocate not less than 10% of its net profit to a legal reserve. This allocation is required until such reserve equals 20% of capital stock. The legal reserve may be used to compensate losses or may be capitalized, being compulsory to refund it in both cases.
General Stockholders Meeting, dated March 20, 2014 and March 22, 2013, approved to allocate 10% of the profits available for periods 2013 and 2012, amounting to S/. 18,262 thousand and S/. 10,161 thousand, respectively, to increase the legal reserve.
(c) Dividends Paid
The Company has as policy of dividend and advances payments to distribute total funds received from Subsidiaries for these items, deducting the amount corresponding to operating expenses of the period. In that sense, during 2014, and 2013, the following dividends were declared:
| At Board of Directors Meeting, held on October 16, 2014, an agreement was reached to pay dividends on account of profit or loss of the period 2014 for S/. 40,310 thousand. |
F-173
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
| At Board of Directors Meeting, held on July 17, 2014, an agreement was reached to pay dividends on account of profit or loss of the period 2014 for S/. 105,790 thousand. |
| At General Stockholders Meeting, held on March 20, 2014, an agreement was reached to distribute dividends amounting to S/. 85,149 thousand. |
| At Board of Directors Meeting, held on October 17, 2013, an agreement was reached to pay dividends on account of profit or loss of the period 2013 for S/. 38,080 thousand. |
| At Board of Directors Meeting, held on July 18, 2013, an agreement was reached to pay dividends on account of profit or loss of the period 2013 for S/. 90,029 thousand. |
| At General Stockholders Meeting, held on March 22, 2013, an agreement was reached to distribute dividends amounting to S/. 54,394 thousand. |
Dividends paid to individuals and non-domiciled legal entities in Peru are subject to a withdrawal of 4.1%.
(25) Sales Income
This caption comprises the following:
F-174
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(26) Generation Costs
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Natural gas supply, transport and distribution |
327,796 | 276,158 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization (note 29) |
208,221 | 206,962 | ||||||
Impairment of plant and equipment |
5,917 | 36,006 | ||||||
Purchase of energy, power and toll (a) |
215,463 | 131,945 | ||||||
Third-party services (b) |
57,405 | 57,025 | ||||||
Water royalties and electricity taxes |
22,781 | 21,618 | ||||||
Personnel expenses (note 28) |
38,679 | 39,040 | ||||||
Consumption of various supplies |
14,288 | 14,087 | ||||||
Various charges for operations |
58,208 | 46,582 | ||||||
Compensation for additional generation and others |
55,505 | 45,192 | ||||||
Consumption of oil |
82 | 8,602 | ||||||
Taxes and other |
4,105 | 3,472 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,008,450 | 886,689 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | It includes purchases to related parties (note 8 (d)). |
(b) | It includes services rendered by related parties for S/. 704 thousand (S/. 521 thousand during 2013). |
(27) Administrative Expenses
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Personnel expenses (note 28) |
32,645 | 31,094 | ||||||
Third-party services (a) |
14,622 | 14,084 | ||||||
Taxes (b) |
491 | 1,863 | ||||||
Various charges for operationstax sanctions |
3,391 | 3,620 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization (note 29) |
2,333 | 2,659 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
53,482 | 52,320 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | It includes services rendered by related parties for S/. 2,770 thousand (for S/. 1,701 thousand during 2013). |
(b) | It includes the reversal of a provision for tax contingency in favor of subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. for S/. 5,569 thousand of which S/. 1,274 thousand correspond to taxes and the amount of S/. 4,295 thousand correspond to interest. |
F-175
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(28) Personnel Expenses
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Remunerations |
30,720 | 29,691 | ||||||
Workers profit sharing |
29,389 | 28,674 | ||||||
Social contributions |
3,234 | 3,781 | ||||||
Vacations |
2,790 | 3,569 | ||||||
Others |
5,191 | 4,419 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
71,324 | 70,134 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
Personnel expenses are distributed as follows:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Generation costs (note 26) |
38,679 | 39,040 | ||||||
Administrative expenses (note 27) |
32,645 | 31,094 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
71,324 | 70,134 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(29) Depreciation and Amortization
This caption comprises the following:
F-176
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(30) Other Operating Income
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Administrative services to related parties |
4,107 | 3,021 | ||||||
Proceeds from property, plant, and equipment |
301 | 196 | ||||||
Operating and maintenance services |
| 1,601 | ||||||
Transfer of natural gas transport capacity |
2,894 | 3,299 | ||||||
Compensation for use hydraulic system |
7,799 | | ||||||
Service of network movements |
| 3,683 | ||||||
Reimbursement for property damage and lost profits (notes 9 and 13 (g)) |
43,718 | 104,718 | ||||||
Other income |
5,131 | 2,694 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
63,950 | 119,212 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(31) Finance Income and Costs
Finance income comprises:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Recovery of interest for contingencies |
4,295 | | ||||||
Interest on bank deposits |
2,380 | 4,853 | ||||||
Others |
279 | 115 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
6,954 | 4,968 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
Finance costs comprise:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Interest on bonds |
18,593 | 24,746 | ||||||
Interest on bank loans |
11,084 | 9,971 | ||||||
Interest on leasing |
3,191 | 3,670 | ||||||
Loss on derivative financial instruments (note 20) |
2,321 | 2,585 | ||||||
Update of contingency (note 36) |
311 | 299 | ||||||
Others |
3,612 | 2,365 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
39,112 | 43,636 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(32) Income Tax
Below there is the income tax expense shown in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Current |
194,991 | 184,542 | ||||||
Deferred |
(56,799 | ) | (16,816 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
138,192 | 167,726 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
F-177
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Reconciliation of effective rates of Income Tax to the tax rate is as follows:
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||||||||||
In
|
% |
In
|
% |
|||||||||||||
Profit before income tax |
695,590 | 100.00 | 622,811 | 100.00 | ||||||||||||
Theoretical income tax expense calculated as per legal rate of 30% |
208,677 | 30.00 | 186,843 | 30.00 | ||||||||||||
Tax effect of non-taxable expenses and non-deductible income: |
||||||||||||||||
Income and expenses included in previous year tax returns |
3,564 | 0.51 | 1,938 | 0.31 | ||||||||||||
Financial update of contingency |
(916 | ) | (0.13 | ) | 398 | 0.06 | ||||||||||
Other deductible, net |
(1,351 | ) | (0.19 | ) | (1,395 | ) | (0.22 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of change in deferred tax rate (note 22(a)) |
(94,030 | ) | (13.52 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Reimbursement for material damage |
22,248 | 2.98 | (20,058 | ) | (3.22 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income tax expense recorded |
138,192 | 19.87 | 167,726 | 26.93 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33) Basic Earnings per Share
Calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to controlling interests as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 is presented as follows:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2014 |
2013 |
|||||||
Profit |
293,399 | 239,878 | ||||||
Number of shares (in thousands) |
853,429 | 853,429 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share |
0.344 | 0.281 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(34) Tax Matters
(a) | The income tax returns for fiscal years 2011 through 2014 and sales tax returns for years 2011 through 2014 of subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. are open for review by the Peruvian tax authorities. Due to the possible varied interpretations of the current legal regulations by the tax authority, to date it is not possible to determine, whether future tax assessments will result or not in liabilities for subsidiary Edegel S.A.A.; therefore, any major tax or surcharge that might arise from eventual tax audits would be applied to the results of the period in which it is determined. However, it is the opinion of the Companys management and its legal advisors that, any possible additional settlement of taxes would not be significant for the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
Tax Authorities have reviewed the Income Tax returns of periods 2010 and 2011 issuing the corresponding tax determination and fine resolutions which were appealed by subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. Currently, SUNAT is reviewing the tax obligation from the Income Tax for period 2012. |
Due to the possible varied interpretations of the current legal regulations by the tax authorities, it is not possible to determine, to date, whether a future tax audit will result or not in liabilities for the Company and its Subsidiaries; therefore, any major tax or surcharge that might arise from eventual tax assessments would be applied to the results of the period in which it is determined. However, it |
F-178
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
is the opinion of the Companys and its Subsidiaries management and its legal advisors that, any possible additional settlement of taxes would not be significant for the financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
The income tax is determined according to current tax regulations in Peru. |
The Company and its Subsidiary calculated the income tax for the years 2014 and 2013 with a rate of 30%, which was in force as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
On December 31, 2014, Law 30296 Law for Promotion of Economy Reactivation , was published establishing a progressive reduction in the rates of income tax. Thus, this law has established the following rates: 28% for 2015 and 2016, 27% for 2017 and 2018 and 26% for 2019 onwards. This reduction will be offset with the increase in the rates applicable to dividends whose taxation rate until December 31, 2014 was 4.1%. The new rates are 6.8% for 2015 and 2016, 8% for 2017 and 2018, and 9.3% for 2019 onwards, except for dividend distribution in favor of other legal entities domiciled in Peru in which case the exemption is maintained. |
Accordingly, the Company and its Subsidiary have reestimated the deferred income tax considering the period of reversal of the temporary differences, according to the new rates of income tax above described. As a result, this has generated a decrease in the deferred liability net of income tax of S/. 94,030 thousand, amount that was credited to profit or loss and equity of year 2014 for S/. 94,382 and S/. 89, respectively. |
(b) | For income tax purposes, the market value of the transactions between related parties shall be determined based on transfer pricing standards. These standards define, among others, coverage, relationship criteria, as well as comparability analysis, methodology, adjustments and information. The standards establish that under certain conditions, companies are required to have a Technical Study Report supporting the calculation of transfer pricing with related parties. Likewise, this obligation is required for all transactions made from, to or through territories with low or null taxation. |
The Company and its Subsidiaries management considers that for income tax purposes, pricing regarding transactions such as those aforementioned has been made in accordance with tax legislation; consequently, no significant liabilities will arise as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
(c) | In 2005, a temporary tax on net assets was established, of which the taxable base is the prior period adjusted net asset value, less depreciations, amortizations, legal cash reserve, and specific provisions for credit risk. The tax rate is 0.4% for years 2014 and 2013 and is applied to the amount of net assets exceeding S/. 1 million. It may be paid in cash or in nine consecutive monthly installments. The paid amount can be used as a credit against payments on account of Income Tax General Regime for taxable periods from March to December of the fiscal period for which the tax was paid until maturity date of each of the payments on account, and as a credit for regularization payments of income tax of corresponding taxable period. |
(d) | Likewise, technical assistance provided by entities not domiciled in the country is subject to a 15% income tax withholding, regardless of the place where the service is rendered and provided that income tax law requirements are met. |
(e) | Tax on Financial Transactions (ITF) for fiscal period 2014 was fixed at the rate of 0.005%. This tax is applied on charges and debits in bank accounts or movements of funds made through the financial system, unless the account is tax-exempt. |
F-179
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(35) Commitments
The Subsidiaries have the following commitments as of December 31, 2014:
(a) Electricity supply contracts
Contracts with Regulated Clients:
N° |
Client |
Starting |
Ending |
Energy Supply Contracted |
||||
1 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 30.8 MW | ||||
2 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 28.2 MW | ||||
3 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 28.2 MW | ||||
4 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.9 MW | ||||
5 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 28.7 MW | ||||
6 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 166.7 MW | ||||
7 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 6.3 MW | ||||
8 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 5.8 MW | ||||
9 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 5.8 MW | ||||
10 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 5.5 MW | ||||
11 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 34.1 MW | ||||
12 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 24.8 MW | ||||
13 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 23.9 MW | ||||
14 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 23.9 MW | ||||
15 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.7 MW | ||||
16 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 23.1 MW | ||||
17 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 134.1 MW | ||||
18 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 5.1 MW | ||||
19 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 4.9 MW | ||||
20 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 4.9 MW | ||||
21 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 4.4 MW | ||||
22 |
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 27.5 MW | ||||
23 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 1.7 MW | ||||
24 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 3.2 MW | ||||
25 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 3.2 MW | ||||
26 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.1 MW | ||||
27 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 3.4 MW | ||||
28 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 19.8 MW | ||||
29 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.3 MW | ||||
30 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.7 MW | ||||
31 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.7 MW | ||||
32 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.7 MW | ||||
33 |
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 7.1 MW | ||||
34 |
Edecañete S.A.A (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.74 MW | ||||
35 |
Edecañete S.A.A (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.2 MW | ||||
36 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 2.5 MW | ||||
37 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 4.4 MW | ||||
38 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 4.4 MW |
F-180
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
N° |
Client |
Starting |
Ending |
Energy Supply Contracted |
||||
39 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.1 MW | ||||
40 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 4.5 MW | ||||
41 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 26.0 MW | ||||
42 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.5 MW | ||||
43 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.9 MW | ||||
44 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.9 MW | ||||
45 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.9 MW | ||||
46 |
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 5.3 MW | ||||
47 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 2.7 MW | ||||
48 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 2.9 MW | ||||
49 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 2.9 MW | ||||
50 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.1 MW | ||||
51 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 3.0 MW | ||||
52 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 17.4 MW | ||||
56 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.6 MW | ||||
57 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.6 MW | ||||
58 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.6 MW | ||||
59 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.6 MW | ||||
60 |
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 3.6 MW | ||||
61 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 4.5 MW | ||||
62 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 5.3 MW | ||||
63 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 5.3 MW | ||||
64 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.2 MW | ||||
65 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 4.9 MW | ||||
66 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 28.6 MW | ||||
67 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.9 MW | ||||
68 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 1.0 MW | ||||
69 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 1.0 MW | ||||
70 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.9 MW | ||||
71 |
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 5.9 MW | ||||
72 |
Hidrandina S.A. |
9/1/2012 | 12/31/2015 | Up to 33.2 MW in 2012 | ||||
Up to 20.9 MW in 2013 | ||||||||
Up to 110.3 MW in 2014 | ||||||||
Up to 48.2 MW in 2015 | ||||||||
73 |
Electrocentro S.A. |
9/1/2012 | 12/31/2015 | Up to 10.0 MW in 2012 | ||||
Up to 12.5 MW in 2013 | ||||||||
Up to 54.0 MW in 2014 | ||||||||
Up to 14.6 MW in 2015 | ||||||||
74 |
Electronoroeste S.A. |
6/1/2014 | 12/31/2014 | Up to 39.0 MW | ||||
75 |
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2016 | 12/31/2027 | 67.8 MW | ||||
76 |
Electronoroeste S.A. |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2014 | Up to 22.9 MW | ||||
77 |
Electronorte S.A. |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2014 | Up to 19.2 MW | ||||
78 |
Electrocentro S.A. |
1/1/2014 | 7/31/2014 | Up to 8.5 MW | ||||
79 |
Electronoroeste S.A. |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2014 | Up to 22.9 MW | ||||
80 |
Electronorte S.A. |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2014 | Up to 19.2 MW |
F-181
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
Contracts with Free Users:
Client |
Starting |
Ending |
Energy Supply Contracted |
|||||||
Empresa Siderúrgica del Perú S.A. |
5/8/1997 | 12/31/2017 | 55 MW in HFP, 13 MW in HP since February 2009 | |||||||
Votorantim MetaisCajamarquilla S.A. |
2/1/2001 | 2/28/2017 | 60 MW in HP, 125 MW in HFP | |||||||
Votorantim MetaisCajamarquilla S.A. |
9/1/2009 | 8/31/2019 | 10 MW in HP and 57 MW in HFP | |||||||
Compañía Minera Antamina S.A. |
5/27/1999 | 12/31/2014 | Up to a maximum of 121.5 MW until the | |||||||
termination of the contract | ||||||||||
Industrias Electroquímicas S.A. |
10/1/2005 | 12/31/2014 | 2.7 MW | |||||||
Tejidos San Jacinto S.A. |
5/1/2011 | 4/30/2016 | 7.5 MW | |||||||
Compañía Textil Credisa Trutex S.A.A. |
8/1/2010 | 12/31/2015 | 12.0 MW | |||||||
Moly-Cop Adesur S.A. |
4/1/2010 | 3/31/2020 | Up to 2.0 MW in HP and 16.0 MW in HFP in | |||||||
Lima | ||||||||||
Up to 0.2 MW in HP and 11.0 MW in HFP in | ||||||||||
Arequipa | ||||||||||
Compañía Minera Antamina S.A. |
7/1/2011 | 12/31/2014 | 30 MW | |||||||
Minera Chinalco Perú S.A. |
10/1/2011 | 9/30/2026 | Up to 166 MW | |||||||
Compañía Minera Casapalca S.A. |
3/1/2012 | 12/31/2017 | 14 MW in HP and 57 HFP | |||||||
Shougang Hierro Perú S.A.A. |
5/1/2014 | 12/31/2020 | Up to 70 MW during period 2014-2017 | |||||||
100 MW in 2018-2019 | ||||||||||
110 MW in 2020. | ||||||||||
Praxair Perú S.R.L. |
9/7/2012 | 12/31/2019 | 2.8 MW | |||||||
Administradora Jockey Plaza Shopping Center S.A. |
11/1/2012 | 10/31/2015 | Up to 14.5 MW | |||||||
La Arena S.A. |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2028 | Up to 30.0 MW | |||||||
Hudbay Peru S.A.C |
5/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 90.0 MW | |||||||
Jinzhao Mining Perú S.A. |
6/1/2016 | 1/15/2026 | Up to 30.0 MW | |||||||
Banco Interbank |
9/1/2014 | 8/31/2016 | 1.6 MW |
(b) Natural Gas Supply Contract from Camisea Deposits
By means of the assignment of contractual position agreement, Electroperú S.A. transferred to Empresa de Generación Eléctrica Ventanilla S.A.-ETEVENSA (Etevensa), effective from August 1, 2003, its contractual position in the Contract for Supply of Natural Gas (hereinafter the Contract) entered into between companies that are part of the Contractor in charge of the exploitation of hydrocarbons in Camisea deposits (hereinafter the Contractor). Under the takeover of Etevensa by subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. from June 1, 2006, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. acquired the rights and obligations of Etevensa in the Contract.
The Contract binds upon subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. to exclusively acquire gas from the Contractor until the maximum daily amount established in 3.901MM mcd for power plants of Ventanilla and Santa Rosa. Likewise, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. binds upon to pay a minimum of 100% of the daily contractual quantity (2.50MM mcd from August 21, 2013; this quantity decreased to in 2.30MMmcd).
The purchase price is fixed at the point of receipt (Las Malvinas- Camisea) and is expressed in US$/MMBTU (dollars per million BTU). Effectiveness of this contract is 15 years from August 20, 2004.
F-182
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The cost of natural gas supply as of December 31, 2014 amounted to S/. 156,498 thousand (S/. 140,595 thousand as of December 31, 2013).
(c) Natural Gas Transport Contracts
On May 2, 2005, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. and Transportadora de Gas del Perú S.A. (hereinafter TGP) entered into a Contract for Interruptible Natural Gas Transport Service with the intention that TGP renders services from the point of receipt located in Las Malvinas (Camisea) to the point of delivery in the City Gate of Lurin. This contract will be effective until January 1, 2034.
The maximum daily interruptible quantity (MIQ) that TGP is obliged to transport is the following:
Period |
MIQ (m3 td/day) |
|||
- From July 31, 2007 to July 31, 2008 |
4,200,000 | |||
- From August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009 |
2,700,000 | |||
- From August 1, 2009 to December 14, 2009 |
2,000,000 | |||
- From December 15, 2009 to August 13, 2010 |
1,482,178 | |||
- From August 14, 2010 to December 31, 2019 |
992,624 | |||
- From January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2025 |
1,000,000 | |||
- From January 1, 2026 to January 1, 2034 |
3,100,000 |
On the other hand, on December 10, 2007, the Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. signed the Firm Transportation Service Contract with TGP with the intention that it renders such service from August 1, 2008 to December 31, 2025.
The daily reserved capacity (DRC) amounts to the following values:
Period |
MIQ (m3 td/day) |
|||
- From August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009 |
1,500,000 | |||
- From August 1, 2009 to December 14, 2009 |
2,200,000 | |||
- From December 15, 2009 to August 13, 2010 |
2,717,822 | |||
- From August 14, 2010 to August 1, 2019 |
3,207,376 | |||
- From August 2, 2019 to January 1, 2020 |
2,589,554 | |||
- From January 2, 2020 to December 31, 2025 |
2,100,000 |
The consideration of the service to which the above mentioned interruptible and firm contracts refer is calculated based on tariffs regulated by the Supervisory Entity for Investment in Energy and Mining (OSINERGMIN) applied on gas volumes effectively transported in the case of the interruptible service contract and the reserved volume in the case of the firm service contract.
Cost for these services as of December 31, 2014 amounted to S/. 124,596 thousand (S/. 115,796 thousand as of December 31, 2013) and is recorded in generation costs.
(d) Natural Gas Supply Contract
On August 27, 2004, ETEVENSA, currently the subsidiary Edegel S.A.A., and Gas Natural de Lima y Callao S.R.L. (hereinafter GNLC) entered into the Contract for Interruptible Natural Gas Transport Service through the Main Distribution Network from the point of receipt located in the City Gate of Lurin to the point of delivery in the Ventanilla Thermoelectric Plant. This Contract has a term of effectiveness of 15 years from the date of signing.
F-183
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The maximum daily interruptible capacity (MIQ) of gas that GNLC is obliged to transport is:
Period |
MIQ (m3 td/day) |
|||
- From the signing date to September 21, 2008 |
2,200,000 | |||
- From September 22, 2008 to July 31, 2009 |
700,000 | |||
- From August 1, 2009 to August 22, 2019 |
100,000 |
Likewise, on May 20, 2005, GNLC and subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. signed on other Contract for Interruptible Natural Gas Transport Service through the Main Distribution Network from the point of receipt located in the City Gate of Lurin to the point of delivery in the Santa Rosa Thermoelectric Plant (Santa Rosa Interruptible Service Contract). This contract will be effective until December 31, 2019.
The maximum daily interruptible capacity (MIC) of gas that GNLC is obliged to transport is:
Period |
MIQ (m3 td/day) |
|||
- From August 22, 2008 to December 15, 2009 |
2,000,000 | |||
- From December 15, 2009 to February 28, 2010 |
1,382,178 | |||
- From March 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019 |
900,000 |
On September 22, 2008 and within the Eleventh Public Offering for Contracting of Firm Service and called for the Contracting of the Interruptible Service of Natural Gas Transport through the Main Distribution Network, GNLC and Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. signed the following Firm Service Contracts for the Santa Rosa and Ventanilla plants.
The daily reserved capacity (DRC) of gas that GNLC is obliged to transport is:
Period |
MIQ (m3 td/day) |
|||
Point of Delivery: Ventanilla. |
||||
- From September 22, 2008 to July 31, 2009 |
1,500,000 | |||
- From August 1, 2009 to December 31, 2025 |
2,100,000 |
Period |
MIQ (m3 td/day) |
|||
Point of Delivery: Santa Rosa. |
||||
- From December 15, 2009 to February 28, 2010 |
617,822 | |||
- From March 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019 |
1,100,000 |
The consideration of the service to which the above mentioned contracts refer is calculated based on tariffs regulated by the Supervisory Entity for Investment in Energy and Mining (OSINERGMIN) applied on gas volumes effectively transported in the case of the interruptible service contract and the reserved volume in the case of the firm service contract.
The cost of these services as of December 31, 2014 amounted to S/.46,701 thousand (S/. 19,767 thousand as of December 31, 2013) and is included in generation costs.
F-184
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(e) Long-term Contracts for the acquisition of replacement parts and rendering of maintenance services for Thermal Plants
On May 28, 2004, Empresa de Generación Termoeléctrica Ventanilla S.A.ETEVENSA (Etevensa) signed a long-term service agreement (LTSA) with Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation (currently Siemens Energy Inc.) and Siemens Westinghouse Service Company LTD (its rights and obligations have been assigned to Siemens S.A.C.) for the acquisition of replacement parts and spare parts, as well as for rendering scheduled maintenance services (major and minor) for the two turbines of the Thermoelectric Power Plant in Ventanilla. The LTSA referred to the Siemens turbine of Santa Rosa began operations on the date of signing and will be in force until: (a) each turbine of the Thermoelectric Power Plant of Ventanilla accumulates 108,333 HES; or b) 18 years are reached from the date of beginning of commercial operations of the natural gas plant, whichever occurs first.
Likewise, on June 15, 2005, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A signed a similar contract with the same companies for the acquisition of replacement parts and spare parts, as well as for rendering scheduled maintenance services (minor and major) for the Westinghouse turbine located in the Thermoelectric Power Plant of Santa Rosa. The LTSA referred to the Westinghouse turbine of Santa Rosa began operations on June 1, 2005 and will be in force until: (a) the turbine Westinghouse of the Santa Rosa Thermoelectric Power Plant accumulates 96,000 HES; or (b) 18 years are reached since June 1, 2005; or, (c) two high inspections and two hot gas path inspections are carried out as defined in the contract, whichever occurs first. Due to the claim occurred in May 2013 (note 13(g)) affecting this turbine, the Contract is still suspended as of September 30, 2014.
On the other hand, on March 27, 2009, Siemens Power Generation, Inc. (currently Siemens Energy Inc.) and Siemens Power Generation Service Company, Ltd. (its rights and obligations are currently assigned to Siemens S.A.C.) entered into with Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. other LTSA for the acquisition of spare parts and replacement parts, as well as for rendering scheduled maintenance services (minor and major) for the Siemens turbine installed in the Thermoelectric Power Plant of Santa Rosa. The LTSA referred to the Siemens turbine of Santa Rosa began operations on the date of signing and will be in force until: (a) the Siemens turbine of the Santa Rosa Thermoelectric Power Plant accumulates 100,000 HES; or (b) 18 years are reached since the date of signing; or, (c) two high inspections and two hot gas path inspections are carried out as defined in the contract, whichever occurs first.
The contracts establish various forms of payment such as an initial payment for spare parts and equipment specified in the pertinent agreements, monthly payments based on an accumulation schedule of equivalent service hours for each turbine, monthly fixed payments for turbines, payment as per schedule specified for minor and major scheduled maintenance services, as per the accumulation of equivalent service hours and monthly payment for maintenance services of the control system of gas turbines of each contract.
(f) Fuel Supply Contract for Thermal Plants
On September 7, 2009, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. entered into with Petróleos del PerúPetroperú S.A. (Petroperú) a supply contract of Biodiesel B2 GE or other similar fuel destined to Thermal Plants effective for one renewable year. By means of communications between the parties, effectiveness was extended for three years and was formalized through an addendum dated December 13, 2010, including the automatic renewal if no prior notice is given.
According to the signed contract, Petroperú assumes the commitment to deliver a monthly volume of 20,000 barrels (free volume) or any other volume higher than the latter of firm nature that subsidiary Edegel
F-185
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
S.A.A. has requested with prior notice of 60 days. If Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. does not comply with the purchase of firm requested volume, it will be subject to the payment of a penalty in favor of PetroPerú to indemnify its financing and storage costs.
(36) Contingencies
As of December 31, 2014, the Company and its Subsidiaries have a pending solution of court and arbitration proceedings, as well as administrative and tax procedures related to the developed activities. In management and its internal and external legal advisors opinion, the Company has recorded the liabilities considered as appropriate based on the information available as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and those will not result in liabilities additional to those already recorded by the Company and its Subsidiaries (note 18).
The main contingencies are:
(a) Income Tax Assessments for periods 2000 and 2001
As a result of the tax inspection of the income tax of periods 2000 and 2001, in December 2005, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions amounting to S/. 75,892 thousand (including fines and interest calculated as of that date) for alleged omissions in the income tax payment of period 2000. Likewise, on that date subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified through different tax assessment resolutions amounting to approximately S/. 6,842 thousand, corresponding to default interest related to payments on account of Income Tax of period 2001.
In January 2006, Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. filed a partial appeal against such resolutions paying off the tax obligation related to not claim items. In September 2008, SUNAT notified subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. through an Intendency Resolution which declared the claim partially grounded.
In October 2008, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. filed an appeal against such Intendency Resolution before the Tax Court. The main objections of SUNAT that have been subject to appeal are the following:
(i) | S/. 44,025 thousand for the taxable base for depreciation of revalued fixed assets in period 1996. |
(ii) | S/. 12,574 thousand for the taxable base for finance costs related to loans that the Tax Authority assumes that were used for the purchase of shares of own issuance; therefore, they do not comply with the principle of causality. |
(iii) | S/. 5,673 thousand for the taxable base for negative Inflation Exposure Results of period 2001. |
In July 2012, under criteria established by the Tax Court in Resolution 01516-4-2012 issued in relation to 1999 Income Tax, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. paid to SUNAT the amount of S/. 18,786 thousand, corresponding to the debt related to the objection (i) above, recalculated and updated at that date (including tax, penalties and interest). The payment did not involve the abandonment of the objection, which is still in force.
In August 2014, there was an oral hearing before the Tax Court and the argument brief was filed. In December 2014, the Tax Court issued Resolution 15281-8-2014, by which it resolved the described above appeal.
As of December 31, 2014, the Tax Court Resolution is pending notification and updated challenged contingency amounts to S/. 105,931 thousand (including taxes, fines and interest, calculated as of that date, as well as workers profit sharing).
F-186
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
In opinion of subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. and its legal advisors, there is a high probability of success concerning unpaid challenged items, except for the portion that already has a provision amounting to S/. 2,601 thousand (note 18).
(b) Income Tax Assessments for periods 2002 and 2003
In July 2007, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified by SUNAT through various Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions amounting to S/. 10,224 thousand (including taxes, fines, as well as interest calculated as of that date) for the income tax of periods 2002 and 2003.
In August 2007, Edegel S.A.A. filed a partial appeal against cnacelling the tax obligation related to not claimed items. In October 2008, Edegel S.A.A. was notified through SUNAT resolution which declared claim was partially grounded and established to continue with the collection of the amended debt amounting to S/. 3,154 thousand.
In December 2008, Edegel S.A.A. filed a partial appeal against the mentioned Intendency Resolution. The appeal was mainly related to the objection for exchange difference and interest arising from credits acquired to refinance the debt that was subject to objections in periods 2000 and 2001 because they were allegedly related to the purchase of shares of own issuance.
In August 2014, there was an oral hearing before the Tax Court and the argument brief was filed.
As of December 31, 2014, the appeal is pending resolution and updated challenged contingency amounts to S/. 6,025 thousand (including taxes, fines and interest, calculated as of that date, as well as workers profit sharing).
In opinion of Edegel S.A.A.s management and its legal advisors the appeal has probabilities to success.
(c) Income Tax Assessment for period 2006
In April 2011, subisidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified, through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions, of the income tax determination and payments on account of period 2006 and the alleged omission of the infringement of article 178.1 of the Tax Code (declare false figures or data that may influence in the determination of the tax obligation).
SUNAT determined a lower balance in favor of period 2006 for income tax, as well as higher payments on account for the months of January and February 2006.
In May 2011, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. filed an appeal only in relation to the income tax and related fines. The part that was not objectedpayments on account of January and February 2006- was canceled on that date.
In March 2012, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Intendency Resolution where SUNAT declared the claim groundless. In that month, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. appealed such resolution.
As of December 31, 2014, the appeal is pending resolution and updated challenged contingency amounts to S/. 11,674 thousand (including taxes, fines and interest, calculated as of that date, as well as workers profit sharing).
F-187
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
In opinion of subsidiary Edegel S.A.A.s management and its legal advisors, the appeal has probabilities to succeed.
(d) Income Tax Assessment for period 2007
In May 2013, subisidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions related to income tax determination and payments on account of period 2007 and the alleged omission of the infringement of article 178.1 of the Tax Code (declare figures or false data that have influence in the determination of the tax obligation).
SUNAT determined a lower balance in favor of period 2007 for income tax, as well as higher payments on account and their respective fines as a result of the higher income tax determined in 2006 and that has influence on the determination of the credit balance and payments on account of period 2007.
In June 2013, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. filed an appeal against such resolutions which was declared groundless by SUNAT through Intendency Resolution notified in October 2013. In that month, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. appealed such resolution.
As of December 31, 2014, the appeal is pending resolution and updated challenged contingency amounts to S/. 12,451 thousand (including interest for payments on accounts, fines and interest on the fine, computed as of that date).
In opinion of subsidiary Edegel S.A.A.s management and its legal advisors the appeal has probabilities to succeed.
(e) Income Tax Assessment for period 2008
In April 2013, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions related to income tax determination and payments on account of period 2008 and the alleged omission of the infringement of article 178.1 of the Tax Code (declare figures or false data that have influence in the determination of the tax obligation).
The Tax Authority determined a lower balance in favor of period 2008 for income tax, as well as higher payments on account and their respective fines as a result of the higher income tax determined in 2006 and 2007 and that have influence on the determination of the credit balance and payments on account of period 2008.
In December 2013, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. filed an appeal against such resolutions which was declared groundless by SUNAT through Intendency Resolution notified in June 2014. In July 2014, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. appealed such resolution.
As of December 31, 2014, the appeal is pending resolution and updated challenged contingency amounts to S/. 4,330 thousand (including interest of payments on account, fines and fine interest, calculated as of that date).
In opinion of subsidiary Edegel S.A.A.s management and its legal advisors, the appeal has high probabilities to succeed.
F-188
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
(f) Income Tax Assessment for period 2009
In September 2014, Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified, through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions related to income tax determination and payments on account of period 2009, of the alleged omission of the infringement of article 178.1 of the Tax Code (declare false figures or data that may influence in the determination of the tax obligation).
SUNAT determined (i) omitted income tax of S/. 17,273 thousand (including tax and interest tax) due to (a) objections to the taxable base of year 2009 and, (b) failure to recognize part of the carryforward credit balance determined by subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. in periods 2006 through 2008, (ii) a fine associated to income tax of S/. 781 thousand (including fines and interest), which is linked solely to the objections of period 2009, and (iii) interest on payments on account of S/. 2,484 thousand for the months of March and April 2009.
In October 2014, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. filed a partial appeal. The part that will not be included in the objection corresponds to paragraph (a) of points (i) and (ii) above described. It was paid off in that month before the appeal was filed.
As of December 31, 2014, the updated contingency amounts to S/. 17,945 thousand (including tax and interest calculated as of that date) and the claim was resolved by SUNAT, and were found to be groundless. The resolution issued by such entity was notified to subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. in January 2015. Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. filed an appeal against such resolution within the legal deadline.
In opinion of subsidiary Edegel S.A.A.s management and its legal advisors, the appeal has high probabilities of success.
(g) Assessment for Sales Tax, Municipal Promotion Tax and Ad Valorem of years 2008 and 2009
In December 2013, SUNAT sent Division Resolutions putting under collection (i) US$ 1,644 thousand, for taxes (sales tax, Tax Municipal Promotion and Ad Valorem) which allegedly were not paid in various custom declarations, (ii) US$ 3,287 thousand for a fine equivalent to the double taxation that was allegedly not paid and, (iii) S/. 710 thousand, for a fine equivalent to 0.2 tax units in force in 2009, for an alleged incorrect statement of the value in Custom Declarations.
Such tax assessments are related to Custom Declarations issued for the execution of the Turnkey Contract for Santa Rosa Project, signed between Siemens Power Generation Inc. and subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. and subsequently by the lessor who joined as owner of the goods of such contracts, under the leasing contract signed with subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. for the execution of the project. SUNAT objections were as follows: (i) engineering services rendered abroad by Siemens Power Generation Inc. under the above mentioned contract, should take part of the custom value of imported products, and (ii) the amount of the bond for higher performance of Santa Rosa paid to Siemens Power Generation Inc. should have been added to such value.
In January 2014, it filed a claim against those values and in February 2014, it presented a list of evidence. In October 2014, SUNAT, through management resolution, resolved the claim before mentioned, as follows: (a) maintained the objection (i) above, and annulled the adjustment (ii) referred to in the preceding paragraph and, (b) ordered the issuance of new collection settlements. In that month, SUNAT informed the new Collection Settlements.
In November 2014, an appeal was filed against this management resolution and the new Collection Settlements. In December 2014, a list of evidence was presented.
F-189
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2014, the appeal is pending resolution and challenged contingency amounts to S/. 20,066 thousand (including taxes, fines and interest calculated as of that date).
(h) Claims before ESSALUD (former IPSS)
(i) | Process referred to alleged debts for non-compliance with the payment of contributions to health systems of Decree Law 22482, Decree Law pensions 19990, workplace accidents and occupational disease of Decree Law 18846 during the period from April 1994 and March 1996, for the amount of S/. 8,203 thousand (including interest calculated until June 1996). |
In January 2010, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Resolution which declared that the claim related to the payment of contributions to the health system, workplace accidents and occupational disease was groundless; thus, ordering the continuity of collections. Likewise, ESSALUD declared that the claim related to the pension system was inadmissible since it was within the scope of the National Pension Office (ONP). In January 2010, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. filed an appeal for reconsideration against such Resolution
In December 2010, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Resolution where ESSALUD declared partially founded the appeal filed, ordering the Company to pay a debt amounting to S/. 1,834 thousand (including interest).
In December 2010, Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. made the payment ordering such Resolution.
In January 2011, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. filed to ESSALUD a written document communicating the payment of debt and requesting (i) Declaration of total and full payment of debts, (ii) lack of any other debt derived from the inspection process and, (iii) the final document of the file.
Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. is waiting for the Resolution of ESSALUD that responds to the above mentioned written document.
(ii) | Claim referred to payment orders through which it is intended to collect to subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. the alleged omission in the payment of contributions to ESSALUD, during the period comprised between April 1997 and December 1998. ESSALUD notified subsidiary Edegel S.A.A., through resolution that it declared the annulment of the payment orders, except for the one related to period June 1997 on which no opinion has been issued yet. |
As of December 31, 2014, the claim filed against the payment orders issued for the period June 1997, is still pending and the updated challenged contingency amounts to S/. 555 thousand.
The provision recorded by subsidiary Edegel S.A.A., for both processes, as of December 31, 2014 amounts to S/. 1,411 thousand (note 18).
(i) Property Tax Assessment of Periods 2000 through 2004
The District Municipality of San Ramon notified subsidiary Edegel S.A.A., through Tax Assessment Resolution and Fine Resolution requiring a payment of amount of S/. 3,388 thousand for Property Tax of periods 2000 through 2004 and S/. 26 thousand for fine, including default interest calculated as of 2005. The Municipality supports the tax assessment when including in the taxable base, movable property and investments in land of third parties.
F-190
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
In June 2005, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. filed an appeal against above mentioned resolutions based on the fact that the Property and Fine Tax corresponding to period 2000 are prescribed and that, concerning other periods, the taxable base assumed by the Municipality considers elements that are not adjusted to law provisions.
Other claims have been accumulated to this process, which were filed by subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. against Tax Assessment Resolutions for which the Municipality of San Ramón requested the payment of Work Compliance Rates and Planning Application, respectively, amounting to S/. 258 thousand each of them.
In June 2014, subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Tax Court resolution 07326-7-2013, requiring the Municipality of San Ramón to convey the complete and original record of the appeal.
In opinion of subsidiary Edegel S.A.A.s management and its legal advisors, there are high probabilities to obtain a favorable result concerning the tax assessment of period 2000 because the prescribed year. Likewise, there are also high probabilities of success concerning the contingency associated to the valuation of property made by the Municipality and its inclusion within the taxable base for the tax determination of periods 2001 to 2004. On the other hand, concerning the claim related to the inclusion of investments in land of third parties within the taxable base for the tax determination of periods 2001 to 2004, the contingency has been classified as probable, reason why the provision recorded by subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. as of December 31, 2014 amounts to S/. 3,688 thousand (note 18).
(j) Fine associated to the Real Estate Transfer Tax of year 2009 imposed by the District Municipality of San Ramon
In October 2010, the District Municipality of San Ramon notified subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. through the Fine Resolution 049-2010/MDSR for which the amount of S/. 977 thousand was subject to collection for allegedly having incurred in the infraction established in paragraph 1 of article 178° of the Tax Code.
In November 2010, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed a claim against the above mentioned resolution, stating that it is no longer appropriate since there is no obligation of submitting a Real Estate Transfer Tax return.
In April 2011, subsidiary Chinango was notified through Management Resolution 113-2011-GR-MDSR through which the District Municipality of San Ramon declared inadmissible the dispute of tax assessment. Subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed an appeal against Management Resolution requesting the Municipality to resolve the claim, since it was submitted under legal established terms.
In July 2011, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. was notified through Municipal Management Resolution 090-2011-GEMU-MDSR that General Management Resolution 113-2011-GR-MDSR was declared invalid.
As of December 31, 2014, the claim filed by subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. is pending resolution and the related contingency amounts to S/. 1,787 thousand.
In the opinion of Companys and its Subsidiaries management and legal advisors there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(k) Income Tax Assessment for period 2010
In January 2013, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. was notified through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions about alleged omissions in the income tax determination of period 2010, and the alleged infringement committed concerning article 178.1 of the Tax Code, respectively.
F-191
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
The debt subject to collection for income tax results from unknown finance costs from arising certain liabilities that were transferred by subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. to subsidiary Chinango S.A.C., in the simple reorganization carried out in May 2009.
In February 2013, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. paid the debt for income tax amounting to S/. 1,440 thousand and related penalty and interest for S/. 767 thousand and filed the corresponding claim.
In September 2013, the subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. was notified with Intendency resolution that the claim was declared to be groundless, confirming the full payment of the debt subject to collection, through payment made in February.
In that month, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed an appeal against that Intendency resolution, which, as of December 31, 2014, is pending before the Tax Court.
In the opinion of Companys and its Subsidiaries management and legal advisors there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(l) Real Estate Transfer Tax Assessment of year 2009 imposed by the District Municipality of San Ramon
In April 2013, the District Municipality of San Ramon notified subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. through various Tax Assessment Resolutions about the collection of an alleged debt of real estate transfer tax levied on the transfer of certain assets within the simple reorganization carried out between the Company and the Subsidiary in May 2009.
In June 2013, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed a claim against the above mentioned Resolutions which was resolved in October 2013 through Mayors Resolution which declared the invalidity of challenged Tax Assessment Resolutions and ordered the conduction of a new tax inspection.
Such tax inspection was carried out during October and November 2013, having that in this last month, the Municipality notified Subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. through a Tax Assessment Resolution about the collection of an alleged omitted tax amounting to S/. 1,689 thousand.
In December 2013, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed a claim against the new Tax Assessment Resolution which was resolved in that same month through Mayors Resolution. This last Resolution declared groundless the claim. In January 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed an appeal against such Mayors Resolution.
As of December 31, 2014, the appeal is pending resolution and updated contingency amounts to S/. 2,901 thousand.
In the opinion of Companys and its Subsidiaries management and legal advisors there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(m) Real Estate Transfer Tax Assessment of year 2009 imposed by the District Municipality of Monobamba
In May 2013, the District Municipality of Monobamba notified subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. through various Tax Assessment Resolutions about the collection of an alleged debt of real estate transfer tax levied on the transfer of certain assets in the simple reorganization carried out between subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. and subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. in May 2009.
F-192
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
In June 2013, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed a claim against the above mentioned Resolutions which was resolved in October 2013 through Mayors Resolution which declared the invalidity of challenged Tax Assessment Resolutions and ordered the conduction of a new tax inspection.
Such tax inspection was carried out during October and November 2013, having that in this last month, the Municipality notified subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. through a Tax Assessment Resolution about the collection of alleged omitted tax amounting to S/. 4,341 thousand.
In December 2013, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed a claim against the new Tax Assessment Resolution which was resolved in that same month through Mayors Resolution. This last Resolution declared groundless the claim. In January 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed an appeal against such Mayors Resolution.
Updated contingency as of December 31, 2014, amounts to S/. 7,938 thousand.
In the opinion of subsidiary Chinango S.A.C.s management and legal advisors there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(n) Real Estate Transfer Tax Assessment of year 2009 imposed by the District Municipality of Masma
In July 2013, the District Municipality of Masma notified subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. through various Tax Assessment Resolutions about the collection of an amount of S/. 1,585 thousand for alleged debt of real estate transfer tax levied on the transfer of certain assets within the simple reorganization carried out between subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. and subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. in May 2009.
In August 2013, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed an appeal against the mentioned Tax Assessment Resolution.
In December 2013, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. was notified with Official Letter issued by the Municipality through which such entity informs subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. that it will declare inadmissible the above mentioned appeal if there is no proof of payment of the tax debt accepted at the Municipal cash register since the payment on consignment (in The judiciary) is not valid. In January 2014, the Subsidiary responded to the Official Letter.
As of December 31, 2014, the appeal is pending resolution and updated contingency amounts to S/. 2,899 thousand.
In the opinion of Companys and its Subsidiaries management and legal advisors, there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(o) Property Tax Assessment of year 2010 imposed by the District Municipality of San Ramon
In December 2013, the District Municipality of San Ramon notified subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. through a Tax Assessment Resolution about the collection of S/. 229 thousand for an alleged omitted payment of the Property Tax of year 2010.
In February 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. filed an appeal against the mentioned Tax Assessment Resolution and in March 2014, it presented an amended complaint.
F-193
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
In September 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. was notified through (i) management resolution, that the Municipality decided to declare void the contested Resolution and to start a new assessment, and (ii) a Request that a new assessment would commence, requesting documentation and the conduction of an inspection. Subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. presented a list of evidence in response to that Request indicating that the new assessment should be null, since the assessment that gave rise to the process described in this section, has not been declared null.
As of December 31, 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. is awaiting the pronouncement of the Municipality; the updated contingency amounts to S/. 374 thousand.
In opinion of Management and its legal advisors there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(p) Income Tax Assessment for period 2011
In January 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. was notified through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions about the collection of alleged omissions in the income tax determination of period 2011 for interest on payments on account from January to December 2011, and the alleged infringement committed concerning article 178.1 of the Tax Code related to each of the items above mentioned.
The debt subject to collection related to income tax arising from unknown finance costs of certain liabilities that were transferred by subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. to subsidiary Chinango the S.A.C., during the simple reorganization carried out in May 2009.
In February 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. paid the debt for income tax and related interest amounting to S/. 1,162 thousand, and interest of payments on account for S/. 149 thousand and penalties and related interest for S/. 613 thousand and file the corresponding claim.
As of December 31, 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. was notified through Intendency Resolution where SAUNAT declared the claim groundless and confirmed and declared that the debt under collection was paid off, after payment made in February 2014.
In the opinion of Companys and its Subsidiaries management and legal advisors, there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(q) Property Tax Assessment of years 2009 through 2014 imposed by the District Municipality of Centro Poblado San Juan de Uchubamba
In October 2014, the District Municipality of Centro Poblado San Juan de Uchubamba notified subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. through a Payment Order about the collection of the amount of S/. 902 thousand for an alleged omitted payment of the Property Tax of years 2009 through 2014.
In November 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. was notified about a collection resolution where a tax enforcement officer of said Municipality, announced the beginning of the debt coercive collection of the Payment Order above mentioned, giving a period of 7 working days to make payment.
F-194
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements
In the same month, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. presented (i) an appeal against the Payment Order thus it did not make the payment, due to its manifest illegality, and (ii) a letter to the coercive executor requesting the suspension of the procedure for enforced collection because within the statutory period, the subsidiary appealed for respective claim.
In December 2014, subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. was notified with (i) mayors resolution through which the claim was declared inadmissible and (ii) a Coercive collection resolution requesting the Subsidiary to establish an address for the proceeding within a term of no longer than 3 business days. With regard to the Resolution (i) subsidiary Chinango S.A.C. will appeal within the legal term established and in relation to Resolution (ii), subsidiary Chinango S.A.C., in the same month submitted a brief indicating that there is no need to establish an address for the proceeding, so any notice related to the proceeding should be performed in the offices of the Subsidiary.
In the opinion of Companys and its Subsidiaries management and legal advisors there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(r) Sales Tax Assessment for period 2000
On December 27, 2004, the Company was notified through tax assessment and fine resolutions resulting from the review of the determination of income tax and payments of sales tax of year 2000. The objection was the result of the lack of knowledge of a transaction conducted in 2000, whereby the Company outsourced from its stockholders of Cono Sur S.A. and Entergy Perú S.A. the technical assistance services to be provided to the Subsidiary for the development of the Yanango and Chimay projects.
The Company complained such Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions, arguing that SUNAT evidence originally presented were insufficient. The Company presented additional evidence relating to the service provided. However, SUNAT maintained its position which was later appealed before Tax Court on December 5, 2008.
The contingency related to this tax assessments, updated as of December 31, 2014 amounts to S/. 81,789 thousand (including taxes, fines and interest calculated as of that date).
As of December 31, 2014, the appeal filed by the Company has pending resolution by the Tax Court.
In opinion of the Companys management and its legal advisors, there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(37) Subsequent Events
In the opinion of management and after December 31, 2014 and until the date of this report, no events or significant events that require adjustments or disclosures to the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2014 have occurred.
F-195
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for
the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
(including Independent Auditors Report)
|
KPMG en Perú Torre KPMG. Av. Javier Prado Oeste 203 San Isidro. Lima 27, Perú |
Teléfono Fax Internet |
51 (1) 611 3000 51 (1) 421 6943 www.kpmg.com/pe |
The Stockholders and Board of Directors
Generandes Peru S.A.:
Report on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial statements of Generandes Peru S.A. and its subsidiaries, which comprise the consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entitys preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entitys internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Caipo y Asociados S. Civil de R.L. sociedad civil peruana de responsabilidad limitada y firma miembro de la red de firmas miembro independientes de KPMG afiliadas a KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), una entidad suiza. |
Inscrita en la partida N o 01681796 del Registro de Personas Juridicas de Lima. |
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Generandes Peru S.A. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
Lima, Peru,
July 4, 2014
|
Juan Jose Cordova (Partner)
Peruvian Certified Public Accountant
Registration 01-18869
F-198
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011
(Stated in thousands of nuevos soles)
Note |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
6 | 172,907 | 188,107 | 170,027 | ||||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
7 | 155,090 | 144,957 | 135,589 | ||||||||||
Accounts receivable from related parties |
8 | 26,986 | 58 | 1,109 | ||||||||||
Other accounts receivable |
9 | 111,294 | 8,401 | 9,032 | ||||||||||
Inventories |
10 | 67,844 | 68,731 | 65,622 | ||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
20 | 646 | 277 | 252 | ||||||||||
Other no financial assets |
11 | 22,266 | 16,664 | 9,706 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total current assets |
557,033 | 427,195 | 391,337 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||||
Investments in associate |
12 | 260,382 | 259,771 | 275,271 | ||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
20 | 36 | 2,794 | 1,125 | ||||||||||
Property, plant, and equipment |
13 | 3,750,010 | 3,795,708 | 3,881,405 | ||||||||||
Intangible assets |
14 | 52,146 | 51,811 | 2,375 | ||||||||||
Deferred income tax asset |
21 | 29,165 | 9,806 | 8,077 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total non-current assets |
4,091,739 | 4,119,890 | 4,168,253 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total assets |
4,648,772 | 4,547,085 | 4,559,590 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
16 | 293,090 | 190,084 | 97,426 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable to related parties |
8 | 4,489 | 4,872 | 73 | ||||||||||
Other accounts payable |
17 | 71,982 | 61,942 | 54,536 | ||||||||||
Provisions, current portion |
18 | 18,537 | 18,509 | 71,952 | ||||||||||
Current portion of financial liabilities |
15 y 19 | 165,515 | 146,175 | 171,188 | ||||||||||
Income tax payable |
31,630 | 8,754 | 63,958 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total current liabilities |
585,243 | 430,336 | 459,133 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities |
19 | 638,999 | 730,399 | 878,480 | ||||||||||
Provisions |
18 | 15,126 | 14,566 | 8,657 | ||||||||||
Deferred income tax liability |
21 | 769,648 | 789,161 | 777,329 | ||||||||||
Employee benefits |
3,394 | 3,586 | | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total non-current liabilities |
1,427,167 | 1,537,712 | 1,664,466 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities |
2,012,410 | 1,968,048 | 2,123,599 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Equity |
22 | |||||||||||||
Share capital |
853,429 | 853,429 | 853,429 | |||||||||||
Other capital reserves |
142,406 | 132,240 | 126,042 | |||||||||||
Other reserves |
32,198 | 59,072 | 49,919 | |||||||||||
Accumulated currency translation losses, net |
(21,375 | ) | (22,220 | ) | 14,919 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
386,592 | 339,378 | 245,301 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Equity attributable to controlling interest |
1,393,250 | 1,361,899 | 1,289,610 | |||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
1,243,112 | 1,217,138 | 1,146,381 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total equity |
2,636,362 | 2,579,037 | 2,435,991 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
4,648,772 | 4,547,085 | 4,559,590 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes on pages F-204 to F-268 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-199
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
(Stated in thousands of nuevos soles)
Note |
2013 |
2012 |
||||||||
Operating income: |
23 | |||||||||
Energy |
975,499 | 1,053,535 | ||||||||
Power |
435,872 | 440,643 | ||||||||
Other operating income |
21,072 | 29,961 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
1,432,443 | 1,524,139 | |||||||||
Generation costs |
24 | (886,689 | ) | (929,599 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Gross profit |
545,754 | 594,540 | ||||||||
Administrative expenses |
25 | (53,320 | ) | (50,553 | ) | |||||
Other |
28 | 119,212 | 12,590 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Operating profit |
611,646 | 556,577 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other income (costs): |
||||||||||
Share of profit of associate carried under the equity method |
54,728 | 55,145 | ||||||||
Finance income |
29 | 4,968 | 6,706 | |||||||
Finance costs |
29 | (43,636 | ) | (54,769 | ) | |||||
Exchange difference net |
(5,615 | ) | (245 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
10,445 | 6,837 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Earnings before income taxes |
622,091 | 563,414 | ||||||||
Income tax expense |
21 y 30 | (167,726 | ) | (177,349 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Profit for the year |
454,365 | 386,065 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Profit attributable to: |
||||||||||
Controlling interests |
239,878 | 201,703 | ||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
214,487 | 184,362 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
454,365 | 386,065 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Weighted-average number of ordinary shares outstanding for calculation of earnings per share (thousands) |
31 | 853,429 | 853,429 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share (S/. per share) |
31 | 0.281 | 0.236 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
The notes on pages F-204 to F-268 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-200
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012
(Stated in thousands of nuevos soles)
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Profit for the year |
454,365 | 386,065 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) items that are or may be reclassified to profit or loss |
||||||||
Net change in cash flow hedgesexchange rate |
(51,652 | ) | 16,022 | |||||
Net change in cash flow hedgesinterest rate |
187 | 1,873 | ||||||
Currency translation difference |
1,559 | (68,523 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total comprehensive income for the year, net of tax |
404,459 | 335,437 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Attributable to: |
||||||||
Controlling interests |
213,849 | 173,717 | ||||||
Non-controlling interests |
190,610 | 161,720 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total comprehensive income for the year |
404,459 | 335,437 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The notes on pages F-204 to F-268 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-201
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
(Stated in thousands of nuevos soles)
Share Capital (note 22 (a)) |
Other capital
|
Other reserves |
Accumulated
|
Retained
|
Non-controlling
|
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2011 |
853,429 | 126,042 | 49,919 | 14,919 | 245,301 | 1,146,381 | 2,435,991 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | | 201,703 | 184,362 | 386,065 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the year |
9,153 | (37,139 | ) | (22,642 | ) | (50,628 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year |
| | 9,153 | (37,139 | ) | 201,703 | 161,720 | 335,437 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2011 complementary dividend (note 22(c)) |
| | | | (6,938 | ) | (6,536 | ) | (13,474 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
2012 dividend advances (note 22(c)) |
| | | | (94,490 | ) | (85,936 | ) | (180,426 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Approval of legal reserve (note 22(b)) |
| 6,198 | | | (6,198 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Others |
| | | | | 1,509 | 1,509 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2012 |
853,429 | 132,240 | 59,072 | (22,220 | ) | 339,378 | 1,217,138 | 2,579,037 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
| | | | 239,878 | 214,487 | 454,365 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) for the year |
(26,874 | ) | 845 | (23,877 | ) | (49,606 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income (loss) for the year |
| | (26,874 | ) | 845 | 239,878 | 190,610 | 404,459 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2012 complementary dividend (note 22(c)) |
| | | | (54,394 | ) | (49,980 | ) | (104,374 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
2013 dividend advances (note 22(c)) |
| | | | (128,109 | ) | (114,661 | ) | (242,770 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Approval of legal reserve (note 22(b)) |
| 10,166 | | | (10,161 | ) | 5 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balances as of December 31, 2013 |
853,429 | 142,406 | 32,198 | (21,375 | ) | 386,592 | 1,243,112 | 2,636,362 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The notes on pages F-204 to F-268 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-202
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
(Stated in thousands of nuevos soles)
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Cash receipts from customers |
1,712,325 | 1,805,480 | ||||||
Cash payments to suppliers, related parties, workers and tax authority |
(997,042 | ) | (1,122,646 | ) | ||||
Other cash payments related to operations activities, net |
(180,066 | ) | (218,822 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash from operating activities |
535,217 | 464,012 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisition of property, plant, and equipment |
(54,922 | ) | (68,062 | ) | ||||
Dividends from associate |
23,955 | 1,859 | ||||||
Sale of property, plant, and equipment |
| 2,810 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(30,967 | ) | (63,393 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Increase in financial obligations |
11,080 | 25,790 | ||||||
Dividends paid |
(346,724 | ) | (198,232 | ) | ||||
Repayments of financial obligations |
(139,645 | ) | (160,468 | ) | ||||
Interest and returns |
(41,184 | ) | (46,345 | ) | ||||
Other cash payments related to financing activities, net |
(2,977 | ) | (3,284 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(519,450 | ) | (382,539 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(15,200 | ) | 18,080 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
188,107 | 170,027 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
172,907 | 188,107 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The notes on pages F-204 to F-268 are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
F-203
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for each
of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
(1) Reporting Entity
(a) Background
Generandes Perú S.A. (hereinafter the Company) is a corporation created in Peru initiating operations in December 1995. Its legal domicile is located at Avenida Víctor Andrés Belaúnde 147, Torre Real Cuatro, San Isidro, Lima, Peru.
The Company is a subsidiary of Endesa Chile S.A. which holds 60.998% of capital stock as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, a company which in turn is a subsidiary of Endesa S.A. from Spain, which is controlled by Enel, S.p.A. (hereinafter Enel) from Italy.
As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Companys subsidiaries are Edegel S.A.A. and Chinango S.A.C. (hereinafter the Subsidiaries), with 54.20% and 43.36% interest, respectively.
(b) Business Activity
The Company is engaged in the electricity generation through its subsidiaries Edegel S.A.A. and Chinango S.A.C.
Edegel S.A.A.
Edegel S.A.A. is mainly engaged in the generation and commercialization of Electrical energy and power to private and public companies. Edegel S.A.A. has five hydroelectric power plants, three of them are located in the basins of the Santa Eulalia and Rimac rivers, approximately 50 km from Lima with effective power of 556.8 MW. It also has two thermoelectric plants, one with effective power of 304.9 MW, located in the Cercado de Lima and another with 485.0 MW located in Ventanilla. Total effective power amounts to 1,346.7 MW.
Chinango S.A.C.
Chinango S.A.C. is engaged in electricity generation, commercialization and transmission activities. For this purpose, it has two hydroelectric power plants (Yanango and Chimay), located in the department of Junín, with an effective generation capacity of 193.5 MW.
As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, Chinango S.A.C. is a subsidiary of Edegel S.A.A., which holds 80% capital stock.
F-204
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Main data of financial information of the non controlling interest as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and for the periods then ended are as follows:
(c) Approval of Consolidated Financial Statements
On February 18, 2014, the Chief Financial Officer approved and authorized the issuance of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013. On February 28, 2013, the Chief Financial Officer approved and authorized the issuance of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2012. On February 29, 2012, the Chief Financial Officer approved and authorized the issuance of the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2011.
(2) Operations Regulation and Legal Standards Affecting the Electric Sector Activities
The Company and its Subsidiaries are within the scope of various rules governing their activities. Failure to comply with these rules may result in the imposition of sanctions on the Company and its Subsidiaries, affecting both financially and operationally. Management of the Company and its Subsidiaries monitor and evaluate the standard compliance and any complaints presented. As of December 31, 2012 and 2013, management considers that there are no situations that may need the recording of provisions or disclosures on the consolidated financial statements except for those indicated in note 34 of this report.
Regulatory framework governing the activities of the Company and its Subsidiaries can be summarized as follows:
(a) Electricity Concessions Law
In conformity with the Electricity Concession Law, approved through Decree-Law 25844, the electricity sector is divided into three main subsectors, each one covering a different activity: generation, transmission and distribution of electricity. Under that law and law 28832, Law to Ensure the Efficient Development of the Electric Generation , the operations of Sistema Eléctrico Interconectado Nacional (National Electrical Interconnected System) shall be governed by provisions of Comité de Operación Económica del Sistema Interconectado Nacional (Economical Operation Committee of the National Interconnected SystemCOES-SINAC, in order to
F-205
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
coordinate their operation at minimum cost, guaranteeing the supply of electric energy and the best exploitation of energy resources, as well as the planning of the transmission and management of short-term market. Also, COES-SINAC determines and values the transfers of power and energy between generators.
(b) Law to Ensure the Efficient Development of the Electric Generation
In July 2006, Law 28832, Law to Ensure the Efficient Development of the Electric Generation , was enacted being some of its main objectives to ensure sufficient and efficient generation which will reduce the exposure of the Electrical system to the volatility of prices and the risks of rationing, as well as to adopt necessary measures to foster an effective competition in the generation market.
One of the main innovations introduced by the standard is a mechanism of bids that electricity distribution companies shall apply to enter into electricity supply contracts with generating companies to supply electricity public services and, optionally, in the case of free users. The purpose of such provision is to establish a mechanism to promote the development of investments in new generation capacity through long-term electricity supply contracts and firm prices with distributors.
(c) Supervising Body of Investment in Energy and Mines
Organismo Supervisor de la Inversión en EnergíaOSINERGMIN- is the body regulating, supervising and inspecting the activities developed by the entities of the electricity, hydrocarbons and mining sub-sectors, safeguarding quality and efficiency of the service rendered to users, and monitoring compliance with obligations assumed by concessionaires as well as current legal provisions and technical norms, including those related to environment protection and preservation. Also, as part of its standard-setting role, OSINERGMIN may issue related rules and standards of general nature, applicable to entities and users of the sector.
In conformity with Supreme Decree 001-2010-MINAM, OSINERGMIN transferred the environmental supervising, inspecting and sanctioning functions related to hydrocarbons in general and electricity, to the Agency for Environmental Assessment and InspectionOEFA-, an agency established by Legislative Decree 1013 which approved the Law for the Creation, Organization and Functions of the Ministry of the Environment .
(d) Environmental Protection Regulations
In conformity with Electricity Concessions Law and Law 28611, Environmental Act , the Government shall design and apply policies, norms, instruments, incentives and necessary penalties aimed at preserving appropriate environment and National Cultural Heritage, as well as ensuring the rational use of natural resources in the development of activities related to the generation, transmission and supply of electricity and hydrocarbon activities. In this regard, the Ministry of Energy and Mines approved the Environmental Protection Regulations on Electricity Operations (Supreme Decree 29-94-EM) and the Environmental Protection Regulations on Hydrocarbon Activities (Supreme Decree 015-2006-EM).
As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Companys and its Subsidiaries management estimates that in the event of a contingency related to environmental management, it would not significantly affect the consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
F-206
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(e) Quality Technical Standard of Electricity Services
Supreme Decree 020-97-EM approved Norma Técnica de Calidad de los Servicios Eléctricos-NTCSE (Technical Standard of Electricity Services Quality) which establishes the minimum quality levels of the electricity services, including street lighting, and obligations from electricity sector entities and clients that operate under the Electricity Concessions Law.
NTCSE provides for tolerances and quality indicator measurement procedures that shall be taken into account, requiring their compliance by Electrical companies and establishing the methods for calculation of compensations referred to violations of the indicators, being COES SINAC the body in charge of assigning responsibilities and calculating the compensation as mandated by the Law to Ensure the Efficient Development of The Electric generation .
Supreme Decree 057-2010-EM, dated September 11, 2010, which amended the NTCSE, established that if as a result of technical research and analysis conducted by the COES SINAC it is determined that the deficiency of quality is strictly due to a lack of capacity transmission system congestion, agents and COES are exempt from payment of compensation.
(f) Anti-monopoly and Anti-oligopoly Law of the Electric Sector
In November 1997, the Anti-monopoly and Anti-oligopoly Law of the Electric Sector, Law 26876, was issued establishing a limit in the participation in electric power generation companies in order to avoid concentrations that would affect competition (vertical integrations over 5% or horizontal concentrations over 15%).
Resolution 012-99/INDECOPI/CLC establishes the conditions to preserve free competition and transparency in the sector that affect the Company and its Subsidiaries. The main aspect is that Edelnor S.A.A. (company related to Endesa Group and client of its Subsidiaries) must tender its purchases of electricity among all generators existing in the system as its contracts expire, and shall pass into public domain the procedures and results of each tender.
(g) System Guaranteeing the Supply of Electric Energy to SEIN
From year 2004, some contracts of energy supply to distributor companies expired without being renewed nor awarded to a new supplier; thus resulting in withdrawals of energy and power carried out by distributor companies to meet the regulated market, being assigned by COES to the SEIN generators based on various criteria over time.
This situation, known in the industry as withdrawals without contractual support, created severe distortions in the electricity market, which is why the Government tried different solutions through a series of legal provisions, such as the Emergency Decree 007-2004, Law 28447, Emergency Decree 007-2006, Emergency Decree 036-2006, Law 29179, among other provisions of lower hierarchy.
Meanwhile, as a result of the significant growth in the demand for electricity and natural gas, as from year 2006, several incidents related to the congestion of the electricity transmission system and the natural gas transportation systems were registered.
F-207
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The restrictions on production and transportation of natural gas and electricity transmission are events that result in negative externalities, producing increased operating costs of the electricity system and distorting the marginal costs in the spot market.
In order to avoid distortions of marginal costs, a number of legal provisions were issued to reduce the effects of these events on the electricity market. Thus, the Twelfth Final Supplementary Provision of Law 28832, Emergency Decree 046-2007, Legislative Decree 1041 and its Regulations approved by Supreme Decree 041-2008-EM and Emergency Decree 037-2008, as amended by Emergency Decree 049-2011, provided a series of compensation mechanisms for those variable costs that were not covered by the short-term marginal costs calculated by application of these provisions, depending on whether they are related to natural gas transmission or transportation. However, the criteria used for the allocation of such compensations considered a variety of factors, although they related to aspects of the same nature, which represented a number of risks that hinder the contracting of electricity.
Therefore, in order to avoid problems such as those above described and to establish a treatment regarding withdrawals without contractual support, Emergency Decree 049-2008 was issued establishing a uniform criterion for the treatment of marginal cost in the situations described, as well as a regulation for withdrawals without contractual support, thus annulling any provision establishing a different treatment. This emergency decree became effective for the period January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011.
Regarding withdrawals without contractual support, the Emergency Decree 049-2008 established that physical withdrawals of power and energy made by electricity distribution companies in SEIN for the Public Electricity Service, without respective contracts supply entered into with generating companies shall be allocated to generators valued at busbar prices proportionally to the net value of the annual efficient firm energy of each generator less its sale of power by contracts. In these cases, the costs incurred by generators to meet those withdrawals, presented due to higher marginal costs in relation to busbar prices are incorporated in the Tariff for connection to Main Transmission System and assumed by the demand; in turn, margins earned by generators from marginal costs lower than busbar prices passes to the demand, whereby the allocated energy without contractual support does not provide a trading margin, i.e. in net terms, generator sells and buys this energy at marginal costs without a contract.
With regard to Short-Term Marginal Costs of SEIN, Emergency Decree 049-2008 established that they are determined considering that there is no restriction of production or transportation of natural gas and electricity transmission. It was also decided that the Short-Term Marginal Costs could not exceed a limit value (S/.313.50/MWh in accordance with Ministerial Resolution 607-2008-MEME/DM). It also indicates that the difference between the variable operating costs incurred by plants operating with variable costs greater than Short-Term Marginal Costs shall be covered through an additional fee on the Tariff for connection to Main Transmission System and assumed by the Demand.
The validity of the Emergency Decree 049-2008 was extended twice; the first time it was extended until December 31, 2013 by Emergency Decree 079-2010 and the second time it was extended until December 31, 2016 by Law 30115 Law of Financial Equilibrium of the Public Sector Budget for the Fiscal Year 2014 , published on December 2, 2013.
F-208
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(h) Short-Term Market Regulation
The Short-Term Market Regulation was published in June 2011 by means of Supreme Decree 027-2011-EM establishing that this market should become effective on January 1, 2014; however since the MINEM is preparing a proposal for amending this regulation by means of Supreme Decree 032-2012-EM published on August 30, 2012, it was decided to postpone the beginning of the effective date of that market until January 2016, thus suspending all the actions conducted for the approval of the technical procedures of the COES necessary to make the operation effective.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, some of the aspects set by that regulation still in force are:
Agents envisaging to participate in the short-term market must integrate the COES. The Free Users must have equipment for independent, remote and automatic disconnection. Distributors must constitute guarantees and trusteeships and identify Free Users for whom they buy in that market and also be up to date with its payments resulting from operations. Large Users formed by the group of Free Users shall appoint a representative and enter into a joint and several liability agreements.
Short-term market participants allowed to buy are: i) generators, to meet their supply contracts (except for distributed generators and those using renewable resources), ii) distributors, to serve free Users, and iii) Large Users, to meet their own requirements.
In turn, short-term market participants allowed to sell are: i) Generators, up to the amount of capacity that they can generate with their own plants and/or capacity contracted with third parties, ii) Generators using renewable energy resources ruled by Legislative Decree 1002, up to the capacity limit that they can generate with its own power plants, and iii) the Co-generators and Generator-Distributors connected to the SEIN, up to the limit of their energy surpluses not contracted.
Participants buying in the short-term market shall not be exempted from charges for transmission, distribution and other services and / or regulated uses. COES may decide on power cut to Large Users and Free Users for non-compliance with obligations and/or payments, and holders of the connection systems are required to make such cuts. It also states that congestion pricing will be allocated to those affected by congestion.
Transfers shall be made based on actual marginal costs obtained from the real-time operation.
Operating costs for rigidities and complementary services not covered by actual marginal costs will be determined by COES and assumed by the members of the short-term market.
The guarantees given by the supplier shall be easily realizable and enforceable and shall cover all obligations of the Participants.
COES must also establish the criteria for the creation of trusts by participants that purchase, considering that trusts of Distributors shall guarantee the payment of their Free Users.
(i) Energy Security System on Hydrocarbons and Energy and Social Inclusion Fund
Law 29852, published on April 13, 2012 created the Energy Security System on Hydrocarbons (SISE) and Energy and Social Inclusion Fund (FISE), whose regulation was established by Supreme Decree 021-012-EM published on June 9, of the same year.
F-209
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
SISE should be composed of a network of pipelines and storage facilities considered as strategic by the Government for ensuring the nationwide fuel supply, which will be paid by a charge to pipeline transportation of liquid products derived from hydrocarbons and natural gas. FISE shall be used to widespread the use of natural gas for residences and vehicles in vulnerable sectors and to compensate the development of new energy supplies in energy frontier, and for social compensation and promotion of access to LPG in vulnerable urban and rural communities. This fund is funded by free electricity users, through a surcharge on pipeline transportation of liquid products derived from liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas liquids, and through a surcharge on the monthly billing of users of the service of natural gas transport through pipelines.
(j) Temporary Measures Associated with Remuneration for Power
By Supreme Decree 032-2012 -EM, published on August 30, 2012, the Ministry of Energy and Mines established transitory provisions related to the remuneration for Firm Power from thermoelectric units.
It was established that a natural gas power plant guarantees the transportation of natural gas when the contracted firm capacity allows operating at effective power during peak hours. This modification allows the thermoelectric units with firm transportation capacity of gas power to operate effectively during peak hours (even though they do not have the carrying capacity that allows them to operate 24 hours a day at effective power) to participate with such power and its variable cost of natural gas in preparing the ranking of variable costs used to determine the power units that pay for power by participating in the coverage of high demand and reservation of system.
This provision is temporary and will be in force while the gas transport concessionaire, Transportadora del Gas del Perú S.A. (TGP), does not have the carrying capacity set forth in the Addendum to the BOOT contract (Build , Operate, Own, Transfer) signed with the Peruvian State.
(k) Exchange of Information in Real Time for SEIN Operation
On November 27, 2012, the Ministry of Energy and Mines issued Resolution 243-2012-EM/DGE approving the adoption of a new Technical Standard for the Exchange of Information in Real Time for the SEIN operation, which replaced the previously existing rule, approved by Directorial Resolution 055-2007-EM/DGE dated December 3, 2007.
The approved standard adopted a new stratification of information of signals and states of the power system submitted in real time to the System Coordinator, based on the voltage level criterion, to weigh the information that is most relevant for the coordination of SEIN operation in real time.
Concerning the requirements of availability of signals rates, the application phases were redefined. A first stage was approved with a minimum availability of 75%, which will be valid until May 27, 2014, a second stage with a minimum availability of 90% for a period of 1 year from the completion of the first stage; and a third stage, called the target stage with an availability of 96% in some cases and 98% in the case of signals considered as high priority, which correspond to premises with voltage levels greater than or equal to 100 kV and power plants greater than or equal to 50 MW.
Ministry of Energy and Mines through Directorial Resolution 444-2013-EM-DGE, published on October 31, 2013 modified Directorial Resolution 243-2012-EM-DGE, establishing that the COES must retransmit in real-time to OSINERGMIN and the General Electricity Agency of the Ministry of Energy and Mines, the information exchanged through the communication network between the control centers of the members of SEIN and the control center of COES.
F-210
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(l) Mass Use of Natural Gas
On December 22, 2012, Law 29969 Law dictating regulations to promote the mass use of natural gas was published. This Law established that OSINERGMIN shall transfer S/. 200 million to FISE; it empowered state electricity distribution companies to implement programs for mass use of natural gas, including the distribution of natural gas in their concession areas. The Ministry of Energy and Mines, in a maximum period of 3 years after the start of the distribution of gas, shall begin the process of promoting private investment for awarding the gas distribution concession. Local and regional governments were also authorized to transfer the resources arising from royalties to the state electricity distribution companies.
Modification was also made on the Law Creating the SISE and FISE , which established that the charge levied by the carrier of natural gas from the electricity generator, must be compensated by the demand through an additional charge included in the toll of the main transmission Electrical system. It also said that the mass use of natural gas for residences and vehicles shall mainly focus on poor population and regions that do not have royalties.
Supreme Decree 014-2013 -EM, published on May 25, modified the regulations on Law for Promotion of Natural Gas Industry (Law 27133) approved by Supreme Decree 040-99 -EM. This supreme decree modified several articles of said regulations. It also proposes the development of pipeline branches along the main transport network whose construction, operation and maintenance will be provided by the Transport Concessionaire in order to promote the mass use of natural gas delivering this hydrocarbon to new areas of natural gas distribution (cities surrounding the path of the Main Network).
Since the current regulations on Law for Promotion of Natural Gas do not require the transport concessionaire to invest in such infrastructure, it is necessary to enter into an Addendum between the Government (grantor) and the Transport Concessionaires including a Main Network scheme, to include in their transport systems the indicated branches, called Main Referrals.
The annuity of the Operation and Maintenance of the said branches shall be determined according to the efficient costs as determined by OSINERGMIN taking into account the economic and financial information of the concessionaire, using in the same way the discount rate of the concession agreement.
Yearly income to be received by the holder of the Main Bypass will consist of: 1) contributions from Independent Consumers served by the main take-off pipelines (whose tariff will be calculated with the maximum carrying capacity of the take-off pipeline), and 2) the contributions of the National User/Consumer of the Main Network who pays regulated tariffs affected by a Tariff Application Factor (FAT) as defined by OSINERGMIN, which may not exceed of 1.2.
(m) Energy Security and Development of the Southern Petrochemical Complex
On December 22, 2012, Law 29970 Law that Strengthens the Energy Security and Promotes the Development of the Southern Petrochemical Complex was published. This Law declared of national interest the implementation of measures for strengthening the energy security, obtaining and transporting ethane in the south of the country, and the construction of regional pipelines in the regions of Huancavelica, Junín and Ayacucho, from the existing pipeline. Also by means of this Law, complementary provisions were enacted to streamline and simplify the administrative procedures related to obtaining permits and authorizations.
F-211
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Regarding the strengthening of energy security:
The companies responsible for implementing the projects of natural gas and natural gas liquids supply would be benefited from the Guaranteed Income mechanism provided that there is an improvement in the energy security of the electricity sector, being necessary to grant such projects through concession agreements arising from investment promotion processes.
A number of necessary projects were established to increase energy security, provided they operate together and in parallel with the transport system of gas and/or liquids currently existing in Camisea, among which we can mention:
| A gas pipeline and liquids pipeline from Camisea to Chiquintirca Compression Station, except for the section that under contractual obligation corresponds to the existing concessionaire. |
| A gas pipeline and/or liquids pipeline from the existing system to Anta, Cusco which shall be able to supply natural gas to the future Quillabamba Power Plant and to the south coast of Peru. |
| A regasification plant and premises for import of liquefied natural gas located in Pampa Melchorita. |
The portion non recovered with the tariff income of the concessionaire may be covered as per the mentioned Guaranteed Income mechanism or as established by Law 29852 Energy Security System on Hydrocarbons and Energy and Social Inclusion Fund as the Ministry of Energy and Mines may establish.
ELECTROPERÚ will participate in the development of the Southern Petrochemical Complex project by supplying natural gas and contracting gas carrying capacity from Anta to the south coast of Peru for the operations of said Energy Complex and the Petrochemical Complex in southern Peru.
Users will assume as an additional charge in the toll of the main transmission system: i) compensations related to natural gas costs that foster the installation of power generation in the north and south of Peru, and ii) the contracting of gas firm transport not covered by existing generators, in order to make feasible the development of the South Nodal Energy.
Regarding the development of the Petrochemical Complex the following is established:
| Ethane can be obtained through: i) negotiation with Contractors of blocks exploiting or that will exploit natural gas; or ii) the extraction of ethane from natural gas purchased by customers. |
| PETROPERU will participate in the development of the Petrochemical Complex and its participation will be established by the Ministry of Energy and Mines. |
| The Ministry of Energy and Mines will make a capital increase in Petroperu for up to US$ 400 million which has a temporary character for up to a maximum of 15 years. |
Through Supreme Decree 038-2013-EM, published on October 17, 2013, the Ministry of Energy and Mines approved a regulation that promotes the growth of electricity generation within the framework of Law 29970; among other considerations, it was established that the Ministry of Energy and Mines, by means of Ministerial Resolution, will approve, every two years, at the request of COES and view of OSINERGMIN, the requirement of capacity, location and terms of commercial operation that shall be bid, necessary to strengthen the energy security.
F-212
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(n) Mechanism for Natural Gas Disruption Emergency Response
By means of Supreme Decree 050-2012-EM, published on December 31, 2012, a mechanism was established for dealing with emergencies that endanger the continuity of natural gas supply which will be activated in emergency situations that are beyond the control of the producer and/or concessionaire of transport and/or distribution and that may fully or partially affect the natural gas and/or liquids of natural gas activities.
| It is established that in such situations the available natural gas will be used solely for the domestic market, following an order of priority, being the electric generators ranked in fourth place of priority, after regulated residential and commercial customers and transport users. |
| An automatic statement of Exceptional Situation is established in the SEIN. |
| Payment of compensation for deficiencies in product quality and power supply is exempted. |
| Permission is granted to those who are required to maintain stocks of liquid fuels, for using them. |
(o) The Energy Policy and Plan for Universal Access to Energy
In order to have a reliable, efficient, and self-sufficient energy supply, with reasonable prices, minimal environmental impact, and little exposure to increased volatility in prices for fossil fuels, the Peruvian government considered it necessary to establish a state policy in the energy field so that the energy requirement that accompanies all economic growth can be guaranteed in the medium- and long-term.
Accordingly, Supreme Decree 064-2010-EM, published on November 24, 2010, approved the Perus National energy policy for the period 2010-2040 which sets 9 energy policy objectives and their respective guidelines, which consist of:
(i) | Diversification of the energy matrix with emphasis on renewable sources and energy efficiency. This policy establishes the need to promote projects and investments to diversify energy matrix through renewable conventional and non-conventional sources, hydrocarbons, geothermal and nuclear sources; it also establishes the promotion of the use of distributed generation and prioritize the construction of hydroelectric plants. |
(ii) | Competitive energy supply. It establishes the need to have the necessary infrastructure throughout the electricity and hydrocarbons supply chain to ensure energy supply; it also establishes a regulatory framework that promotes competition, minimizes the market concentration and promotes pricing transparency, and regulates access and rates when it is not possible to establish competition mechanisms. Other guidelines of this objective are to develop mechanisms to limit the impact of volatility of world market prices, and to promote private investment; the State performing its subsidiary role. |
(iii) | The universal access to energy supply; this objective seeks to achieve total coverage of electricity and hydrocarbons supply, temporarily subsidizing it for low-income populations. Also it establishes that local communities shall be involved in rural electrification projects, fostering the productive use of energy in remote, rural and marginal urban areas. Transport systems necessary for the service to reach all locations should also be prioritized. |
F-213
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(iv) | The efficiency in the production and consumption of energy; to achieve this goal it is necessary to encourage the efficient use of energy to obtain measurable results, being necessary to involve energy companies and users in energy efficiency programs through promoters and incentive mechanisms. It also addresses the need to use smart technology systems to ensure appropriate management of the supply and demand of energy and the creation of the energy-efficiency center to be a decentralized organization that promotes the efficient use of energy. |
(v) | Self-sufficiency in energy production; it proposes the promotion of the production of electricity based on available energy resources in the regions and fostering exploration and exploitation of these resources. It also shall promote investments to implement, upgrade and expand the countrys refineries in order to meet domestic demand. On the other hand, it also considers maintaining supply procurement processes to achieve beforehand the adequacy of power generation. It also establishes the rational use of energy resources to ensure their availability. |
(vi) | The energy sector development with minimal environmental impact; this objective foster the development and use of clean energy and technology with low emissions of pollutants as well as the establishment of mitigating mechanisms for emissions from energy activities. It aims at promoting energy projects that can get the benefits from the sale of certified emission reductions for the carbon market; it seeks to achieve a harmony between the state, communities and businesses. |
(vii) | The development of industry and use of natural gas; it proposes to promote the substitution of oil-derived fuels for the use of natural gas and liquefied petroleum gas - LPG-in the industry and transportation, mass use of natural gas through decentralized distribution systems. It also considers fostering the development of the petrochemical industry and promoting the development of a polyduct network and strengthening the system of hydrocarbons transport and storage according to the countrys growth. |
(viii) | Institutional strengthening and transparency in the sector; it establishes the need to act and promote transparency in the activities of the sector and to ensure legal stability that allows to boost energy development in the long term. It also considers the promotion of research, development and technological innovation in the energy sector, among other points. |
(ix) | Regional energy integration with a long-term vision; establishes the need to continuously identify the benefits of energy integration, entering into agreements leading gradually to market integration. |
Through Ministerial Resolution 203-2013-MEM/DM, published on May 28, 2013, the Ministry of Energy and Mines approved the Plan for Universal Access to Energy 2013- 2022 . It identifies two key priorities in the global energy sector:
(i) | Universal access to energy, which defines 100% access to basic human needs by year 2030 and is based on two objectives: |
| 100% access to basic human needs by year 2030, 100% access to electricity: lighting, communication, and community services. |
| 100% access to technologies and fuels for cooking and heating: improved stoves, natural gas, LPG, and biogas. |
F-214
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(ii) | Improving energy efficiency. |
Access to energy is considered one of the pillars in the fight against poverty.
The objective of this plan is to promote, from the energy field, an efficient, environment-sustainable and fairly economic development, implementing projects that allow universal access to electricity supply, prioritizing the use of available power sources, with the objective to generate more and better quality of life for low-income populations.
Resources to implement the Plan for Universal Access to Energy will be: The Social Inclusion Energy Fund transfers to the public sector, external funding sources, contributions, allowances, grants, resources through agreements, and resources considered in the National Plan of Rural Electrification 2013-2022.
(p) Regulatory Contribution
As a consequence of the transfer of the environmental supervising, inspecting and sanctioning functions of OSINERGMIN to the Agency for Environmental Assessment and Inspection OEFA- through Supreme Decree 127-2013-PCM and 129-2013-PCM, published on December 19, 2013, new regulatory contributions from energy entities and companies (Electricity and hydrocarbons) to OSINERGMIN and OEFA were established.
These contributions are obtained as a result of applying the percentages established to the monthly billing, corresponding to transactions with third parties directly related to the controlled, regulated and monitored activity, deducting the sales tax and Municipal Promotion Tax.
(3) Basis for the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements
(a) Statement of Compliance
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
(b) Information Responsibility
The information contained in these consolidated financial statements is the responsibility of the Companys Management which expressly states that all the principles and criteria included in the IFRSs issued by the IASB have been applied.
(c) Basis of Measurement
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis, except for the derivative financial instruments which are measured at fair value.
(d) Functional and Presentation Currency
The consolidated financial statements are presented in nuevos soles (S/.) which is the Companys and its Subsidiaries functional and presentation currency.
F-215
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(e) Significant Accounting Estimates and Use of Judgments
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the Companys and Subsidiaries management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expense. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected.
Resulting accounting estimates, very rarely will be the same as the respective actual results. However, in managements opinion, actual results will not vary significantly from estimates and assumptions applied by the Company and its Subsidiaries. The main accounting estimates made by management are the following:
| Useful life of property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets (see notes 4i and 4m). |
| Impairment of property, plant and equipment (see note 4k). |
| The assumptions used to calculate the actuarial liabilities and obligations to employees, such as discount rates, mortality tables, salary increases, and others. |
| The assumptions used to calculate the fair value of financial instruments (see notes 4d and 4e). |
| Energy supplied to customers whose meter readings are pending. |
| Certain assumptions inherent in the electricity system affecting transactions with other companies, such as production, customer billings, energy consumption, etc. that allow for estimating electricity system settlements that must occur on the corresponding final settlement dates, but that are pending as of the date of issuance of the consolidated financial statements and could affect the balances of assets, liabilities, income and expenses recorded in the statements. |
| Likelihood of occurrence and the amount of liabilities of uncertain amount or contingent (see note 34). |
| Future disbursements for the closure of facilities and restoration of land (see note 4l). |
Management has exercised its critical judgment when applying accounting policies for the preparation of these consolidated financial statements, as explained in the corresponding accounting policies.
(f) Consolidated Financial Statements
These consolidated financial statements comprise Generandes Perú S.A. and its subsidiaries Edegel S.A.A. and Chinango S.A.C. as mentioned in note 1.
(i) Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by Generandes Perú S.A. The Company controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on which control commences until the date on which control ceases.
F-216
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Transactions, balances and unrealized gains with the entities that the Company controls are eliminated. Also, unrealized losses are eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of impairment in the value of the transferred assets.
(ii) Non-controlling Interests
Interests from third parties that are not part of the Company are shown as non-controlling interests under the equity in the consolidated statement of financial position and in the consolidated statement of income.
Non-controlling interests are measured at their proportionate share of the subsidiaries net assets.
(4) Significant Accounting Policies
Main accounting principles applied in the preparation of consolidated financial statements are detailed below. These principles and practices have been applied consistently to all years presented in these financial statements.
(a) Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, demand deposits in banks, and other short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to know amount of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
(b) Trade Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable arises from sale of energy and power, which are billed in the month following dispatch of energy, recording dispatch of energy, and the estimated amount of unbilled energy provided in the month.
Trade accounts receivable are classified as Loans and Accounts receivable (see (g))
(c) Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the weight average method, except for materials in transit which is determined by using the specific cost method. The net realizable value takes into consideration the periodic technical studies on inventory obsolescence prepared by Management.
The estimate of inventory obsolescence is determined based on periodic technical studies on inventory obsolescence prepared by Management. This estimate is charged to the results of the fiscal period in which such deductions occur.
(d) Non-Derivative Financial Instruments
Non-derivative financial instrument is any contract that gives rise to both a financial asset in one entity and a financial liability, or equity instrument in another. In the case of the Company and its Subsidiaries, non-derivative financial instruments correspond to primary instruments such as accounts receivable and accounts payable.
F-217
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Non-derivative financial instruments are classified as asset, liability, or equity according to the contract that gave rise to the financial instrument.
The interest, dividends, gains, and losses generated by a financial instrument, and classified as liability, are recorded as income or expense in the statement of income. The payment to holders of financial instruments classified as equity is recorded directly against equity. The financial instruments are offsetted when the Company and its Subsidiaries have the legal right to offset them, and management has the intention of paying them on a net basis or negotiating the asset, and paying the liability simultaneously.
Non-derivative financial instruments are recognized in the financial statements at fair value. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
In managements opinion, the carrying amount of non-derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are substantially similar to their fair values due to their short periods of realization and/or maturity or are subject to variable and fixed interest rate similar to those used in the market.
(e) Non Derivative Hedging Instruments
If there is a strong correlation between income and changes in the exchange rate of the US dollar, the Company will be subject to a currency risk for its future cash flows. IAS 39 allows the hedging of this income by obtaining funding in this currency. Exchange differences on this debt, being hedging cash flows, are recognized net of tax effect, in a reserve account in equity and recorded in the income statement in the period in which hedged cash flows will be realized. This period has been estimated at ten years.
(f) Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedge Accounting
Derivative instruments are recorded in conformity with IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement .
Financial derivative contracts for which the Company and its Subsidiaries have established a cash flow hedging relationship are recorded as assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and presented at their fair value.
When a derivative is designated as a cash flow hedging instrument, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized in the separate statement of comprehensive income and is presented in hedge reserves. Any ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
(g) Financial Assets
The Company and its Subsidiaries classify their financial assets in the following categories: i) financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, ii) loans and accounts receivable, iii) held-to-maturity financial assets, and iv) available-for-sale financial assets. Management determines the classification of their financial assets as of the date of their initial recognition.
Financial Assets Valued at Fair Value through Profit or Loss
A financial asset is classified in this category if it was mainly acquired in order to be sold in the short-term or if it is so designated by Management. Derivative financial instruments are also classified as marketable unless they are designated as hedges. The Company and its Subsidiaries did not hold financial assets under this category.
F-218
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Loans and Accounts Receivable
Loans and accounts receivable are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. They arise when the Company and its Subsidiaries provide with money, goods or services directly to a debtor, with no intention to trading the account receivable. Loans and accounts receivable are included in trade accounts receivable and other accounts receivable in the statement of financial position (notes 7, 8 and 9).
Loans and accounts receivable are initially recognized on the trade date.
The Company and its subsidiaries derecognizes a financial asset when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or it transfers the rights to receive the contractual cash flows in a transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the financial asset are transferred, or it neither transfers nor retains substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership and does not retain control over the transferred asset. Any interest in such derecognized financial assets that is created or retained by the Company and its subsidiaries is recognized as a separate asset or liability.
These assets are initially recognized at fair value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measures at amortized cost using the effective interest method.
These assets are assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is objective evidence of impairment.
The Management considers evidence of impairment at individual asset level.
Held-to-maturity financial assets
Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities acquired with the intention and ability to hold them to maturity. As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company and its Subsidiaries do not hold financial assets under this category.
Available-for-sale financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets designated in this category or that do not classify in any of the other categories. These assets are shown as non-current assets unless Management has expressed intention to sell the investment within 12 months after the date of the statement of financial position. As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company and its Subsidiaries did not hold financial assets under this category.
(h) Investments in Associate
Associates are those entities in which the Company and its Subsidiaries have significant influence, but not control; as in the case of the investment that the Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. has in Endesa Brasil S.A. which is part of the Endesa group.
Edegel S.A.A. records its investments in Endesa Brasil S.A. under the equity method, recognizing changes in the results and the equity of the associate, on a proportion basis.
F-219
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Also, because the functional currency of the associate is different from Edegel S.A.A.s, the effect of translating the balances into Peruvian nuevos soles as presentation currency is recognized, i.e. , balances of the statement of financial position are translated at the closing exchange rates of each year and the results at average exchange rate; recording any difference under the other reserves in the equity. Dividends received from the associate are recorded as a decrease in the investment value.
(i) Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are measured at cost, less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment losses.
This caption also includes assets acquired under finance lease and spare parts to be used in major inspections of power plants. When the assets are sold or disposed of the cost and accumulated depreciation are eliminated, and any gain or loss resulting from their disposal is included in the consolidated statement of income.
The initial cost of property, plant, and equipment comprises their purchase price, including non-reimbursable customs fees and purchase taxes as well as any other directly attributable cost of bringing the asset to its working condition and for its intended use, and the estimate of the initial decommissioning costs. Cost incurred after fixed assets starts operating are recognized as assets provided that: (i) it is probable that future economic benefits embodied within the asset will flow to the Company, and (ii) the cost of the asset can be measured reliably. Routine repairs and maintenance of plant and equipment are charged to the statement of income in the period in which they are incurred.
Assets under construction are capitalized as a separate component. Upon completion, the cost of these assets is transferred to a definitive category. Work-in-progress is not depreciated.
Land is not depreciated. Depreciation is calculated to write off the cost of items of property, plant and equipment less their estimated residual values, using the straight-line method.
Years |
||||
Buildings and other constructions |
45 | |||
Plant and equipment |
18 | |||
Furniture and fixtures |
9 | |||
Various equipment |
7 | |||
Vehicles |
5 |
Residual value, useful life and depreciation methods are periodically reviewed and adjusted by management according to the forecasted economic benefits to be provided by the components of property, plant, and equipment.
(j) Finance Lease
Assets held by the Company and its subsidiaries under finance leases are measured initially at an amount equal to the lower of their fair value and the present value of the minimum lease payments
Finance lease generates asset depreciation expenses and debt financing costs in each accounting period. The depreciation policy for assets held under finance leases is consistent with that for other assets of property, plant and equipment of the Company and its Subsidiaries.
F-220
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(k) Impairment of Long Lived Assets
Throughout the year, and especially at year-end close, the Company and its Subsidiaries review whether there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the assets recoverable amount is estimated. In the cases of identifiable assets that do not generate cash flows independently, estimation is made on the recoverability of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs, understanding as such the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates independent cash inflows.
The recoverable amount of an asset is the greater of its fair value less costs to sell and value in use, this being understood as the present value of estimated future cash flows.
To estimate the value in use, the Company and its Subsidiaries prepare future cash flow projections based on most recent budget available. These budgets include the best estimates of Management on revenues and costs of the cash-generating units based on industry projections, past experience and future expectations.
These projections cover the next five years, estimating cash flows for the following years by applying growth rates of 3.6% which does not exceed the average long-term growth rate for the sector and for the country.
These flows are discounted to calculate their present value at a rate that reflects the capital cost of the business and the geographical area in which it operates. For its calculation, it takes into account the current cost of money and the risk premiums generally used by analysts for the business and geographic area. The discount rate applied at 2013 year-end was 8.0%.
The assumptions used to determine the value in use as of December 31, 2013 do not present major changes compared to those as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.
When there is an indication that the impairment loss no longer exists or has decreased, the reversal of losses is recorded in the statement of income.
(l) Provision for Decommissioning of Power Plants
Liabilities for decommissioning are recognized when the Company and its Subsidiaries are required to dismantle and remove facilities to restore the site where the plants are located, and when a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Removal costs are recorded at the present value of estimated future expenditure determined in accordance with local requirements and conditions, which are periodically reviewed, including the discount rate used to calculate the present value. Initially, the amount of fixed assets is recognized by an amount equivalent to the provision. Subsequently, this amount will be depreciated as well as the items of fixed assets. All changes in the liability, other than changes resulting from the unwinding of the discount, which are recorded in profit or loss, are added to or deducted from the cost of the related asset in the current period.
(m) Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are recognized initially at cost. An intangible asset is recognized if it is identifiable and the Company and its subsidiaries has the power to obtain the future economic benefits flowing from the underlying resource and to restrict the access of others to those benefits. After initial recognition, intangible assets are accounted for at cost less accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses. These assets are amortized using the straight-line method based on their estimated useful life.
F-221
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Companys main intangible assets comprise a right to use water from Lake Huascacocha, which is registered as concessions and rights.
Useful life and amortization method are periodically reviewed by management according to the estimated economic benefits to be provided by the components of intangible assets.
Amortization is calculated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the asset
Years |
||
Concessions and rights |
25 - 30 | |
Software |
3 - 21 |
(n) Financial Liabilities
Financial liabilities are initially recognized at their fair value, net of incurred transaction costs. These liabilities are subsequently recorded at their amortized cost, and any resulting difference between the funds received (net of transaction costs) and the redemption value is recognized in the consolidated statement of income over the obligation using the effective interest method.
Financial liabilities are classified as current liability unless the Company and its Subsidiaries have the unconditional right to differ settlement of the liability for at least twelve months after the consolidated statement of financial position.
(o) Income tax
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax. It is recognized in profit or loss except to the items recognized directly in equity or in other comprehensive income.
Current tax
Current tax comprises the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year and any adjustment to tax payable or receivable in respect of previous years. It is measured using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Deferred tax
Deferred tax is recognized in respect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes.
Deferred income tax asset and liability are recognized without considering the estimated time when the temporary differences will disappear. Income tax asset is only recognized so far as it is probable that there will be future tax benefits, so that the asset can be used.
Deferred tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied to temporary differences when they reverse, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.
F-222
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(p) Workers Profit Sharing
Workers profit sharing is determined using the same criteria used to determine the current income tax. Workers profit sharing rate applicable to the Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A is 5%.
(q) Provisions
Provisions are recognized when the Company and its Subsidiaries have a present obligation (legal or constructive), as a result of past events, and when it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation, and it is possible to reliably estimate its amount. When the Company and Subsidiaries estimate that a provision, or a part of it, is reimbursable, the reimbursement is recognized only when such reimbursement is virtually certain.
Provisions are reviewed and adjusted in each period to reflect the best estimates at the reporting date of the statement of financial position.
When the effect of the time value of money is material, the value of the provision is the present value of the expenditure required to settle the obligation.
(r) Contingent Liabilities and Assets
Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the financial statements. They are disclosed in notes to financial statements unless the possibility of an outflow of economic resources is remote. In this case, they are not disclosed in the notes.
Contingent assets are not recognized in financial statements, and they are only disclosed in notes when an inflow of economic benefits is probable.
(s) Revenue, Cost and Expense Recognition
Revenue is recognized as far as it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Company and its Subsidiaries.
Sales of energy and power fees are computed based on cyclical readings and are completely recognized in the period when service is rendered. Revenues from the sale of energy delivered but not invoiced between the last cyclical reading and the end of each month is computed based on estimates of energy consumed by users of the service during the deferred period.
Acquisition costs of fuel, energy and tolls are recognized when accrued.
Expenses are recognized on an accrual basis and are recorded in the periods to which they relate.
(t) Finance Income
Interest income is recognized using the effective interest method.
(u) Finance Costs
Interest expense is recognized using the effective interest method. Other financial costs are recognized when incurred. Costs are capitalized if directly attributable to the acquisition or construction of a qualifying asset.
F-223
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Capitalization of finance costs begins when activities to prepare the asset are being carried out and expenses and costs for the loans are being incurred. Capitalization of interest is made until assets are ready for their intended use. If the resulting value of asset exceeds its recoverable amount, it shall be recorded as an impairment loss.
Finance costs comprise interest expense and other costs incurred related to borrowings, translation effect arising from borrowings in foreign currency used to finance projects, since they correspond to an adjustment of interest costs.
(v) Net Earnings per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share are determined by dividing the net earnings attributable to controlling interests by the weighted-average number of outstanding subscribed and paid-in ordinary shares during the period (note 31).
Diluted earnings per share correspond to the basic earnings per share, adjusted for the effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares. As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company and its Subsidiaries do not have financial instruments with dilutive effects; therefore, basic and diluted earnings per share are the same.
(w) Transactions and Balances denominated in Foreign Currency
Foreign currency denominated transactions are those transactions carried out in a currency other than the functional currency. Foreign currency transactions are translated into functional currency at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.
The subsidiaries have established a hedging policy for the portion of revenues that are directly linked to the performance of the U.S. dollar, by obtaining funding in this currency. Translation effect on this debt, as being hedging cash flows, are recognized net of tax effect, in a reserve account in equity and recorded in the statement of income in the period in which hedged cash flows will be realized. This period has been estimated at ten years.
(x) Classification of Balances as Current and Non-Current
The statement of financial position presents balances classified according to their maturity, i.e. , as current in the case of those balances with maturities of twelve months or less, and non-current in the case of those balances with maturities of more than twelve months.
For obligations with maturities of less than twelve months, but whose long-term refinancing is assured at the Companys and its Subsidiaries discretion through unconditionally available long-term loan agreements, are classified as long-term liabilities.
(y) Fair Value Hierarchy
When measuring the fair value of an asset or a liability, the Company and its subsidiaries use market observable data as far as possible. Fair values are categorized into different levels in a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used in the valuation techniques as follows:
Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets and liabilities
F-224
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: Inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data.
(z) Reclassifications
Certain figures of the 2012 and 2011 consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to make them comparable to those of 2013. The nature of the reclassifications, reclassified amounts and affected accounts are summarized as follows:
2012 |
In thousands of S/. |
|||
From Advances to Other Non-Financial Assets |
14,279 | |||
From Trade Accounts Payable to Other Accounts Payable |
2,719 | |||
From Other Accounts Payable to Income Tax |
8,754 | |||
2011 |
In thousands of S/. |
|||
From Advances to Other Non-Financial Assets |
9,061 | |||
From Other Account Receivable to Derivatives Instruments |
252 | |||
From Deferred Income Tax Asset to Deferred Income Tax Liability |
7,902 | |||
From Other Account Payable to Income Tax Payable |
63,958 |
(aa) New Standards and Interpretations Not Yet Adopted by The Company and Its Subsidiaries
The following standards, amendments to standards and interpretations are effective for annual periods beginning after 1 January 2014, and have not been applied in preparing these consolidated financial statements:
| Amendments to IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation , sets out the requirements for offsetting financial assets and liabilities to eliminate some inconsistencies in the application of current criteria for offsetting in IAS 32. Effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. |
| Amendment to IAS 36 Impairment of Assets , this amendment clarifies the scope of disclosures on recoverable value of deteriorated assets, limiting the information requirements to the recoverable amount which is based on the fair value less costs of disposal. Effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. |
| IFRS 9 Financial Instruments covers classification, measurement and recognition of financial assets and liabilities. IFRS 9 was issued in November 2009 and October 2010. It replaces parts of IAS 39 relating to classification and measurement of financial instruments. IFRS 9 requires that financial assets be classified into two measurement categories: those measured at fair value and those measured at amortized cost. This determination is made at initial recognition. The classification depends on the business model of the entity for the administration of financial instruments and the characteristics of the contractual cash flows of the instrument. With respect to financial liabilities, the standard retains most of the requirements of IAS 39. The main change concern the cases where the fair value option is taken for financial liabilities, the part that corresponds to the change in fair value arising from the credit risk of the entity will be recorded in other comprehensive income rather than in profit or loss, unless this creates an accounting discrepancy. Effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. |
F-225
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
| IFRIC 21 Levies , this interpretation of IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets provides guidance on when to recognize a liability for a levy imposed by a government, other than income tax, in its financial statements. Effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. |
The Companys management is evaluating the potential impact that IFRS 9 might have on the date of its effective application. Management estimates that the rest of standards, interpretations and amendments that are not yet effective might not have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements.
(5) Financial Risk Management
The Companys and its Subsidiaries activities are exposed to a variety of financial risks whose potential effects are permanently evaluated by the Companys management in order to minimize exposures. Financial risks are market risks (including the currency risk, price risk, and interest rate risk), credit risk, liquidity risk.
Risk management is conducted by the Management. Management identifies, evaluates and decides, if appropriate, on the contracting of financial risk hedging based on the Board of Directors guidelines.
(a) Currency risk
The Companys and its Subsidiaries are exposed mainly to exchange rate fluctuation risk concerning the Peruvian nuevo sol in respect to the U.S. dollar.
Balances in thousands of U.S. dollars (US$) of asset and liability items as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are summarized as follows:
These balances as of December 31, 2013, have been stated in Peruvian nuevos soles at the following exchange rates established by the Superintendencia de Banca y Seguros (SBS): S/. 2.796 for liabilities and S/. 2.794 for assets (S/. 2.551 for liabilities and S/. 2.549 for assets as of December 31, 2012 and S/. 2.697 for liabilities and S/. 2.695 for assets as of December 31, 2011).
F-226
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
As shown in the table below, if the U.S. dollar had been revalued/devalued as of December 31, 2013; 2012 and 2011 compared to the Nuevo Sol and keeping its entire variable constant, pre-tax income would have decreased or increased as follows:
|
In thousand of S/. |
|||||||
Increase (decrease)
|
Effect on income before
|
|||||||
2013 |
+10 | % | 61,740 | |||||
2013 |
-10 | % | (61,740 | ) | ||||
2012 |
+10 | % | 63,544 | |||||
2012 |
-10 | % | (63,544 | ) | ||||
2011 |
+10 | % | 74,588 | |||||
2011 |
-10 | % | (74,588 | ) |
Exchange rate risk hedge policies are prepared based on projected cash flows and considers maintaining a balance between flows indexed to US$ and level of assets and liabilities in such currency. The objective is to minimize the flow exposure to the risk of variations in the exchange rate. (note 4(e))
(b) Interest rate risk
Since the Company and its Subsidiaries do not have significant interest-bearing assets; their income and operating cash flows are substantially independent from changes in the market interest rates. The Companys and its Subsidiaries exposure to this risk is basically generated by their financial obligations.
If, as of December 31, 2013; 2012 and 2011, interest rates over indebtedness in U.S dollars had been 0.5% higher/lower (in absolute terms) and all the other variables had remained constant, the results for the year before taxes would have been:
Period |
Increase/decrease In interest rate |
Effects in results before tax in thousand of US$ |
||||||
2013 |
+0.5 | % | 3,732 | |||||
-0.5 | % | (3,732 | ) | |||||
2012 |
+0.5 | % | 3,053 | |||||
-0.5 | % | (3,053 | ) | |||||
2011 |
+0.5 | % | 4,006 | |||||
-0.5 | % | (4,006 | ) |
Funding variable rates might expose the Company and its Subsidiaries to the cash flow interest rate risk. The Company and its Subsidiaries minimize this risk contracting financial liabilities mainly at fixed interest rates in the medium- and long-term. Additionally, the Subsidiaries have contracted derivative financial instruments to cover the risk of fluctuations in the LIBOR rate associated to the loans contracted at variable rate (note 19(i)). Financial obligations at fixed or covered rate as of December 31, 2013 is 63% (67% as of December 31, 2012 and 66% as of December 31, 2011).
Fixed-rate debts might expose the Company and its Subsidiaries to interest rate risk on fair value of liabilities. The Companys management considers that this risk is not significant because interest rates applied to its financing contracts do not differ significantly from market interest rates which are available to the Company and its Subsidiaries for similar financial instruments.
Management considers that future fluctuations in the interest rates will not significantly affect the results of the future operations.
F-227
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(c) Credit risk
The Companys and its Subsidiaries financial assets potentially exposed to credit risk concentrations are mainly deposits in banks and accounts receivable presented in the consolidated statement of financial position.
The Company and its Subsidiaries only invest their cash surplus in financial institutions with local investment grade rating.
Credit risk relating to accounts receivable from trading activity, is historically fairly low given the short term for collection from customers, which avoid individual accumulations of significant amounts.
The Companys and its Subsidiaries Management periodically evaluates the credit risk of its client portfolio, based on a methodology designed by its parent company, which takes into account factors such as liquidity, indebtedness, profitability, age of business, payment behavior, criminal records, among others.
(d) Liquidity risk
Liquidity is controlled by balancing maturities of assets and liabilities, keeping a proper number of financing sources, and obtaining credit lines that enable the normal development of its activities. The Company and its Subsidiaries have an appropriate level of resources and keep credit lines with banking entities.
Management permanently monitors its liquidity reserves, based on cash flow projections.
The table below analyzes the financial liabilities of the Company and its Subsidiaries as of the date of the consolidated statement of financial position, classified according to the contractually established maturities:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
Less than
1 year |
1 to 2
years |
2 to 3
years |
3 to 5
years |
5 to 10
years |
Over 10
years |
||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds |
107,938 | 17,762 | 55,900 | 27,950 | 100,774 | 27,950 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank loans |
29,095 | 44,692 | 72,642 | 147,716 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance lease |
28,482 | 38,777 | 38,777 | 66,059 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
293,090 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accounts payable to related parties |
4,489 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accounts payable |
71,982 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
535,076 | 101,231 | 167,319 | 241,725 | 100,774 | 27,950 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
Less than
|
1 to 2
|
2 to 3
|
3 to 5
|
5 to 10
|
Over 10
|
||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds |
108,074 | 98,096 | 16,212 | 51,020 | 121,851 | 25,510 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank loans |
12,075 | 15,952 | 40,790 | 75,840 | 125,281 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance lease |
26,026 | 25,826 | 35,391 | 98,630 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
190,084 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accounts payable to related parties |
4,872 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accounts payable |
61,942 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
403,073 | 139,874 | 92,393 | 225,490 | 247,132 | 25,510 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-228
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
Less than
|
1 to 2
|
2 to 3
|
3 to 5
|
5 to 10
|
Over 10
|
||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonds |
62,652 | 100,000 | 99,515 | 71,079 | 100,964 | 51,970 | ||||||||||||||||||
Bank loans |
66,206 | 13,110 | 10,087 | 99,736 | 135,793 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance lease |
42,330 | 27,304 | 27,304 | 74,835 | 66,783 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
97,426 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accounts payable to related parties |
73 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other accounts payable |
54,536 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
323,223 | 140,414 | 136,906 | 245,650 | 303,540 | 51,970 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management monitors the risk associated with each of the above mentioned categories, which includes maintaining good relationships with financial institutions in order to assure sufficient credit lines at all times, as well as covering its working capital with cash flows coming from operating activities.
As of December 31, 2013, the Company and its Subsidiaries present liquidity of S/. 172,907 thousand (S/. 188,107 as of December 31, 2012 and S/. 170,027 as of December 31, 2011) in cash and other equivalent means and S/. 392,623 thousand in available credit lines (S/. 361,560 as of December 31, 2012 and S/. 309,000 as of December 31, 2011).
In managements opinion, there is no significant liquidity risk as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
(e) Fair Value Estimation
Management estimates that the carrying amounts of current financial instruments as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 do not differ significantly from their fair values due to their short-term maturity; therefore, disclosure of such information is not relevant for an appropriate interpretation of the Companys financial position and its Subsidiary as of those dates, and in the case of the non-current financial obligations, because it accrues interest at market rates.
To calculate the fair value of different derivative instruments, the Company and its Subsidiaries use for their valuation the discounted expected cash flows and generally accepted valuation models based on both cash and future market conditions at the closing date of the period.
(6) Cash and Cash Equivalents
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Cash |
40 | 45 | 52 | |||||||||
Checking accounts (a) |
68,833 | 56,262 | 21,375 | |||||||||
Time deposits (b) |
104,034 | 131,800 | 148,600 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
172,907 | 188,107 | 170,027 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | The Company and its Subsidiaries have checking accounts in local and foreign currency in different local banks; their funds are freely available, and bear interest at market rates. |
F-229
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) | As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company and its Subsidiaries held time deposits in the following financial institutions: |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Banco BBVA Continental |
40,800 | 47,800 | 42,000 | |||||||||
Banco Scotiabank |
| 31,000 | 38,500 | |||||||||
Banco Interbank |
26,500 | 14,000 | 20,000 | |||||||||
Banco de Crédito del Perú |
36,734 | 39,000 | 48,100 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
104,034 | 131,800 | 148,600 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
These time deposits have original maturities between 8 and 28 days.
(7) Trade Accounts Receivable
It comprises the following:
(a) | Accounts receivable are mainly stated in nuevos soles, have current maturity, and do not bear interest. Balance of accounts receivable as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 corresponds to 69, 87 and 44 clients, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company and its Subsidiaries do not have past due trade accounts receivable. |
(b) | The balance of trade accounts receivable as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 includes an amount of S/. 11,887 thousand that corresponds to energy and power withdrawals without the contractual support provided by distribution companies between 2006 and 2007 that were assigned to the Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. by the Committee on Economic Operation of the National Interconnected SystemCOES SINAC. Such withdrawals are valued at busbar prices and have pending invoicing. In Managements opinion, such accounts receivable shall be fully recovered. |
(8) Related Party Transactions
Activity of accounts receivable from related parties is as follows:
F-230
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Activity of accounts payable to related parties is as follows:
(a) | Accounts receivable and payable to related entities do not bear interest and do not have maturity nor specific guarantees, except for trade accounts receivable that correspond to sale of energy and power. Its maturity term is, on average, 10 days. |
(b) | They correspond to dividends declared by the Associate. |
(c) | They correspond to dividends declared and paid by the Company. |
(d) | Operations with related companies that had an impact on profit or loss of the period are shown below: |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
Expenses |
Revenue |
Expenses |
Revenue |
Expenses |
|||||||||||||||||||
Sale of energy, power and transport (note 23) |
457,249 | | 537,736 | | 648,630 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of energy, power and transport (note 24) |
| 5,404 | | 13,639 | | 14,729 | ||||||||||||||||||
Administrative services to related parties. (note 28 and 25) |
3,021 | 1,701 | 2,425 | 1,389 | 911 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Other services (notes 23 and 24) |
135 | 521 | 74 | 388 | 343 | 549 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
460,405 | 7,626 | 540,235 | 15,416 | 649,884 | 15,278 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(e) | There are no balances receivable and payable between the Company and its Subsidiaries, its Directors and Management. |
(f) | Remunerations accrued by Directors and key Management Personnel amount to: |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Directors |
505 | 534 | 422 | |||||||||
Managers |
7,067 | 6,242 | 6,284 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
7,572 | 6,776 | 6,706 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Directors and key Management Personnel only have the remuneration that it is mentioned above.
F-231
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(9) Other Accounts Receivable
This caption comprises the following:
(a) | Corresponds mainly to the estimate of the compensation of the Insurance Company according to the policy coverage subscribed by a loss occurred in Unit TG7. At the date of these financial statements, the insurance claim is collectable. (notes 13 (g) and 28). |
(b) | In opinion of the Company and its Subsidiaries Management, the balance of the estimate for doubtful accounts appropriately covers the credit risk of other doubtful accounts receivable as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. |
(10) Inventories
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Work and maintenance materials |
49,984 | 49,500 | 50,040 | |||||||||
Materials in transit |
17,788 | 19,104 | 14,316 | |||||||||
Oil |
72 | 127 | 1,266 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
67,844 | 68,731 | 65,622 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | During 2013 inventories of S/. 75,583 were written down to net realizable value (S/. 76,921 in 2012 and S/. 73,610 in 2011). |
(11) Other Non-Financial Assets
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Prepaid insurance |
20,083 | 13,007 | 7,821 | |||||||||
Advances |
1,294 | 2,385 | 645 | |||||||||
Other |
889 | 1,272 | 1,240 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
22,266 | 16,664 | 9,706 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-232
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(12) Investments in Associate
It comprises the following:
Effective Shareholding
|
In thousands of S/. (b) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Endesa Brasil S.A. |
3.9966 | 4.1845 | 4.1845 | 260,382 | 259,771 | 275,271 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Corresponds to 6,957,053 common shares of Endesa Brasil S.A., a company incorporated in Brazil where the Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. holds an effective shareholding of 3.9966% in capital stock as of December 31, 2013 (4.1845% as of December 31, 2012, of December 31, 2011 and of December 31, 2010). |
F-233
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(13) Property, Plant, and Equipment
This caption comprises the following:
(TRANSLATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ORIGINALLY ISSUED IN SPANISH)
F-234
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(TRANSLATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ORIGINALLY ISSUED IN SPANISH)
F-235
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(a) | Property, plant and equipment includes interest and other capitalized finance costs related to construction of works-in-progress, as per the indicated criteria (notes 4u). |
(b) | During 2013, 2012 and 2011, no interests were capitalized. |
(c) | As of December 31, 2013, property, plant and equipment includes spare parts for S/. 116,623 thousand (S/. 98,814 as of December 31, 2012 and S/. 86,428 as of December 31, 2011) to be exclusively used in generating units. |
(d) | Property, plant and equipment includes assets of combined cycle of the thermoelectric plant Ventanilla that were acquired by the subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. through finance lease contracts. These contracts were fully canceled at the closing of the period 2012. |
Likewise, PP&E includes assets for the extension of the thermoelectric plant Santa Rosa (Santa Rosa II) that were acquired by Edegel S.A.A. through finance lease agreement (note 19e) and came into force in September 2009. As of December 31, 2013, the net carrying amount of assets acquired for the construction, installation, implementation and commissioning of such generating unit amounts to S/. 201,021 (S/. 216,461 as of December 31, 2012 and S/. 231,902 as of December 31, 2011) from which S/. 34,172 correspond to buildings and other constructions (S/. 35,822 as of December 31, 2012 and S/. 37,471 as of December 31, 2011) and S/. 166,849 to plant and equipment (S/. 180,639 as of December 31, 2012 and S/. 194,431 as of December 31, 2011). |
(e) | Edegel S.A.A. transferred to trust equity the legal ownership of plant and equipment of the combined cycle with the intention that it serves as guarantee of payment of obligations assumed by the financing of the conversion of the Thermoelectric Plant from Ventanilla to combined cycle. The trust agreement was terminated on December 31, 2013. |
(f) | As of December 31, 2012, a change in the discount rate used to calculate the present value of the estimated disbursement of retirement costs resulted in an increase in the provision and at the fixed assets value amounting to S/. 5,814 thousand. |
(g) | In May 2013, a loss occurred in the thermal plant Santa Rosa that affected certain items of assets belonging to Unit TG7, supporting unit. Due to this loss, Edegel S.A.A. recorded an estimated impairment amounting to S/. 36,006 thousand (note 24), that corresponded to the decrease in the carrying amount at the recoverable value of Unit TG7. The estimated impairment was applied to items of assets belonging to Unit TG7 affected by the loss. As of December 31, 2013, Edegel S.A.A. began to remove the items affected by the loss. |
(TRANSLATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ORIGINALLY ISSUED IN SPANISH)
F-236
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2013, Edegel S.A.A. has estimated the indemnity of the insurance company for material damages in S/. 96,593 thousand and for loss of income in S/. 6,918 thousand (notes 9 and 28). |
(h) | The subsidiaries hold insurances on their main assets according to the policies established by Management. In that sense, as of December 31, 2013, the Subsidiaries have insured property, plant and equipment up to an amount of US$ 1,876,208 thousand (US$ 1,844,161 as of December 31, 2012 and US$ 1,841,708 as of December 31, 2011). It is the managements opinion that its insurance policies are consistent with the industry practice, and that the risk of possible losses for claims considered in the insurance policies is reasonable, taking into consideration the Subsidiaries type of assets. |
(14) Intangible Assets
This caption comprises the following:
(a) | The concessions and rights include the Huascacocha project which allows the Company having a higher water flow for the development of power generation activities. The useful live is 30 years. |
F-237
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(15) Short-Term Financial Liabilities:
This caption comprises the following:
(a) | Corresponds to a promissory note amounting to US$ 4,000 thousand signed by Chinango S.A.C with Scotiabank del Peru, obtained for financing working capital. The promissory note has current maturity and accrues interest at an interest rate of 0.78% as of December 31, 2013. |
(16) Trade Accounts Payable
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Supply, gas transport and distribution |
26,402 | 20,950 | 22,836 | |||||||||
Maintenance agreement with Siemens S.A. (a) |
62,637 | 29,208 | 10,179 | |||||||||
Purchase of energy and transmission toll |
18,168 | 26,803 | 16,480 | |||||||||
Suppliers of work-in-progress (b) |
151,866 | 78,015 | 26,139 | |||||||||
Other |
34,017 | 35,108 | 21,792 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
293,090 | 190,084 | 97,426 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-238
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(a) | Corresponds to goods and services delivered by Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation and Siemens Westinghouse Service Company Ltd. by virtue of the long-term service agreements LTSA for acquisition of replacement parts and rendering of scheduled maintenance services (minor and major) for turbines of thermal plants of Ventanilla and Santa Rosa. As established in the contract (note 33e), such amounts shall be paid based on the hours of operation of thermal plants. |
(b) | Includes works-in-progress related to the replacement of items affected by the loss occurred in Unit TG7 (note 13 (g)) for an amount of S/. 72,416 thousand. |
(17) Other Accounts Payable
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Sales tax credit payable |
4,429 | 10,363 | 7,323 | |||||||||
Taxes payable |
3,506 | 3,725 | 3,904 | |||||||||
Remunerations payable |
5,136 | 3,429 | 4,526 | |||||||||
Workers Profit Sharing |
13,407 | 10,993 | 12,706 | |||||||||
Dividends payable to minority stockholder |
| | 7,145 | |||||||||
Insurances payable |
28,124 | 15,071 | 6,242 | |||||||||
Various |
17,380 | 18,361 | 12,690 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
71,982 | 61,942 | 54,536 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18) Provisions
This caption comprises the following:
F-239
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(19) Financial Liabilities
(a) This caption comprises the following:
(*) | The current portion of long-term liabilities includes debt interests accrued and unpaid as of the date of the statement of financial position. |
F-240
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) | Composition of debt bond is presented as follows: |
Creditor |
Origin
|
Issued
|
Issuance
|
Annual
|
Payment of
|
Maturity
|
In thousands of S/. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion |
Non-current portion |
Total debt in force as of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.31.2013 |
12.31.2012 |
12.31.2011 |
12.31.2013 |
12.31.2012 |
12.31.2011 |
12.31.2013 |
12.31.2012 |
12.31.2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First Chinango Bond Program |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 11th Issuance, Serial A |
US$ | 20,000,000 | Nov. 2005 | 6.062 | Per semester. | Nov. 2012 | | | 54,322 | | | | | | 54,322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 13th Issuance, Serial A |
S/. | 25,000,000 | Oct. 2006 | 6.469 | Per semester. | Oct. 2013 | | 25,314 | 314 | | | 25,000 | | 25,314 | 25,314 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 13th Issuance, Serial B |
S/. | 25,000,000 | Jan. 2007 | 6.156 | Per semester. | Jan. 2014 | 25,706 | 706 | 705 | | 25,000 | 25,000 | 25,706 | 25,706 | 25,705 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
25,706 | 26,020 | 55,341 | | 25,000 | 50,000 | 25,706 | 51,020 | 105,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third Edegel Bond Program |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 1st Issuance, Serial A |
S/. | 25,000,000 | Jun. 2007 | 6.313 | Per semester. | Jun. 2022 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 25,000 | 25,000 | 25,000 | 25,039 | 25,039 | 25,039 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 3rd Issuance, Serial A |
S/. | 25,000,000 | Jul. 2007 | 6.281 | Per semester. | Jul. 2019 | 772 | 772 | 772 | 25,000 | 25,000 | 25,000 | 25,772 | 25,772 | 25,772 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 4th Issuance, Serial A |
S/. | 20,000,000 | Aug 2007 | 6.75 | Per semester. | Aug. 2014 | 20,450 | 450 | 450 | | 20,000 | 20,000 | 20,450 | 20,450 | 20,450 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 5th Issuance, Serial A |
S/. | 25,000,000 | Set. 2007 | 6.5 | Per semester. | Mar. 2013 | | 25,461 | 461 | | | 25,000 | | 25,461 | 25,461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 6th Issuance, Serial A |
S/. | 25,000,000 | Nov. 2007 | 6.438 | Per semester. | may-13 | | 25,174 | 174 | | | 25,000 | | 25,174 | 25,174 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 7th Issuance, Serial A |
S/. | 25,000,000 | Dec. 2007 | 6.625 | Per semester. | Jun. 2013 | | 25,083 | 83 | | | 25,000 | | 25,083 | 25,083 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 8th Issuance, Serial A |
US$ | 10,000,000 | Jan. 2008 | 6.344 | Per semester. | Jan. 2028 | 763 | 697 | 737 | 27,950 | 25,510 | 26,970 | 28,713 | 26,207 | 27,707 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 9th Issuance, Serial A |
S/. | 28,300,000 | Mar. 2008 | 6.594 | Per semester. | Mar. 2014 | 28,886 | 586 | 586 | | 28,300 | 28,300 | 28,886 | 28,886 | 28,886 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 10th Issuance, Serial A |
US$ | 9,720,000 | Nov. 2008 | 9 | Per semester. | Nov. 2014 | 27,494 | 298 | 315 | | 24,796 | 26,215 | 27,494 | 25,094 | 26,530 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 11th Issuance, Serial A |
US$ | 8,166,000 | Jan. 2009 | 7.781 | Per semester. | Jan. 2019 | 789 | 720 | 761 | 22,824 | 20,831 | 22,024 | 23,613 | 21,551 | 22,785 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 12th Issuance, Serial A |
US$ | 6,355,000 | Jan. 2009 | 7.125 | Per semester. | Jan. 2015 | 563 | 513 | 543 | 17,762 | 16,212 | 17,139 | 18,325 | 16,725 | 17,682 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
79,756 | 79,793 | 4,921 | 118,536 | 185,649 | 265,648 | 198,292 | 265,442 | 270,569 |
F-241
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Creditor |
Origin
|
Issued
|
Issuance
|
Annual
|
Payment of
|
Maturity
|
In thousands of S/. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current portion |
Non-current portion |
Total debt in force as of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.31.2013 |
12.31.2012 |
12.31.2011 |
12.31.2013 |
12.31.2012 |
12.31.2011 |
12.31.2013 |
12.31.2012 |
12.31.2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fourth Edegel Bond Program |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 1st Issuance, Serial A |
US$ | 10,000,000 | Jul. 2009 | 6.625 | Per semester. | Jul. 2016 | 849 | 774 | 819 | 27,950 | 25,510 | 26,970 | 28,799 | 26,284 | 27,789 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 2nd issuance, Serial A |
US$ | 10,000,000 | Set. 2009 | 6.000 | Per semester. | Set. 2016 | 461 | 421 | 445 | 27,950 | 25,510 | 26,970 | 28,411 | 25,931 | 27,415 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 4th Issuance, Serial A |
US$ | 10,000,000 | Jan 2010 | 6.469 | Per semester. | Jan 2018 | 763 | 697 | 736 | 27,950 | 25,510 | 26,970 | 28,713 | 26,207 | 27,706 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- 5th Issuance, Serial A |
US$ | 10,000,000 | Set. 2010 | 5.781 | Per semester. | Sept. 2020 | 404 | 369 | 390 | 27,950 | 25,510 | 26,970 | 28,354 | 25,879 | 27,360 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,477 | 2,261 | 2,390 | 111,800 | 102,040 | 107,880 | 114,277 | 104,301 | 110,270 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
107,939 | 108,074 | 62,652 | 230,336 | 312,689 | 423,528 | 338,275 | 420,763 | 486,180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) | The current portion of debt for bonds includes interests accrued and unpaid as of the date of the statement of financial position. |
(c) As of December 31, 2013, the main obligations that shall be complied by Subsidiaries related to bond programs are as follows:
Third, Fourth and Fifth Edegel Bond Programs
During the term of the bond issued within the Framework of the Third and Fourth Bond Program, Edegel S.A.A. shall maintain a debt ratio not more than 1.5 times. This debt ratio is calculated as the ratio of the consolidated financial debt (net of cash for up to US$ 50,000 thousand) to the net equity.
On September 23, 2013, Edegel S.A.A. registered its Fifth Corporate Bond Program in the Public Registry of Stock Market for an amount of US$ 350,000 thousand and for which no financial indicators have been established.
First Chinango Bond Program
The main restriction applicable to Chinango S.A.C. during the term of the bonds issued within the First Bond Program, consists of maintaining a debt ratio not more than 1.5 times. This ratio is calculated as the debt-to-equity ratio. In order to make such calculation, no liability for deferred income tax is considered.
F-242
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In Managements opinion, these obligations do not limit nor affect the Company and Subsidiaries operations and are being satisfactorily complied.
(d) On September 30, 2010, Edegel S.A.A. signed with BBVA Banco Continental a financing contract amounting to US$ 61,000 thousand for a seven-year term. The funds were used to pay three promissory notes with Banco Continental for a total amount of S/. 74,000 thousand and to pay the C.O.F installment with maturity in year 2012.
(e) On March 25, 2008, Edegel S.A.A. signed with Scotiabank S.A.A. a finance lease agreement for an amount of US$ 90,000 thousand for the construction of an open-cycle plant in Santa Rosa Power Plant (TG8 Unit) and associated systems. The final amount disbursed under this contract amounted to US$ 84,330 thousand.
(f) In February 2011, Chinango S.A.C. signed with Scotiabank del Perú a financing contract amounting to US$ 31,000 thousand for a seven-year term. Funds were used to pay two (2) short-term promissory notes with Banco de Crédito for a total of US$ 21,000 thousand and a promissory note with Banco Continental for S/. 29,400 thousand with maturity in 2012.
(g) In November 2012, Chinango S.A.C. signed with Bank of Nova Scotia a financing contract amounting to US$ 10,000 thousand for a five-year term. Funds were used to pay the 11th issuance, Serial A of the First Chinango Bond Program.
(h) The main obligations that Edegel S.A.A. shall comply by virtue of long-term bank contracts consist of: (i) Maintaining a debt ratio no more than 1.5 times, measured as the debt to equity ratio and (ii) Maintaining a financial debt ratio over EBITDA at the most of four times. Compliance with these obligations is supervised by Management and in its opinion; such obligations have been complied as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
(i) The debt-to-equity ratio as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was as follows
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Debt-to-equity ratio |
0.39 | 0.37 | 0.31 |
F-243
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(20) Hedging Instruments
(a) Derivative Instrument:
The structure of the derivative instruments as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
Counterparty |
Value
|
Maturity |
Protected debt |
Protected
|
Fixed rate and value |
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded asset |
Recorded liability |
Loss (gain) performed |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Banco de Crédito del Perú |
10,000 | Nov. 2017 | Bank of Nova Scotia | LIBOR 3M | 0.62 | % | 36 | | | 14 | 33 | | 86 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Citibank N.A. |
3,600 | Mar. 2013 |
|
BCPMedium
term basis |
|
LIBOR 3M | 3.29% | | | | | 68 | 975 | 52 | 888 | (1,714 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Scotiabank Perú |
21,267 | Mar. 2017 | Finance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease Scotiabank | LIBOR 3M | 2.73% | | | | 2,646 | 3,991 | 4,336 | 1,585 | 1,565 | (1,866 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Scotiabank Perú |
22,678 | Mar. 2017 | Finance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
lease Scotiabank | LIBOR 3M | 2.28% | | | | 2,189 | 3,378 | 3,376 | 1,383 | 1,341 | (1,253 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency swap: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Banco Continental S.A. |
10,000 |
|
Ago. 2012 |
|
Bco. Continental s/.
29,4 MM |
|
|
Exchange
rate |
|
US$10MM | | | | | | | | | 2,194 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Banco Continental |
8,778 | Jan 2014 |
|
First Chinango
Bond |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Program | Exchange | US$ 8.78 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
- 13th Issuance,
Serial B |
|
Rate | (MM) | 646 | 3,071 | 1,377 | | | | (521 | ) | (586 | ) | 541 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
682 | 3,071 | 1,377 | 4,849 | 7,470 | 8,687 | 2,585 | 3,208 | (2,098 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-244
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.31.2013 |
12.31.2012 |
12.31.2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
Liabilities |
Assets |
Liabilities |
Assets |
Liabilities |
|||||||||||||||||||
Maturity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
646 | 98 | 277 | 155 | 252 | 170 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-current |
36 | 4,751 | 2,794 | 7,315 | 1,125 | 8,517 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
682 | 4,849 | 3,071 | 7,470 | 1,377 | 8,687 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of hedge instruments is presented as an asset or liability, as applicable. Variations in the fair value of these instruments, net of its taxable effect, are recorded with a charge (credit) to the item Hedge Reserves.
Interest Rate Swap
Due to the construction of an open-cycle plant in Santa Rosa Power Plant (TG8 Unit) and associated systems, on March 25, 2008, Edegel S.A.A. signed with Scotiabank S.A.A. a finance lease agreement for an amount of US$ 90,000 thousand that bears an interest rate of 90 day LIBOR plus 1.75% with final maturity in March 2017. In order to fix the interest rate of such debt; Edegel S.A.A. entered into two swap transactions for an amount of US$ 30,000 thousand each one. The fixed interest rate after the swap transactions are 2.73% and 2.28%, respectively.
In November 2012, Chinango S.A.C. signed with Bank of Nova Scotia a financing contract amounting to US$ 10,000 thousand for a five-year term. Funds were used to pay the 11th issuance, Serial A of the First Chinango Bond Program. In order to fix the interest rate, Chinango S.A.C. entered into a swap transaction with Banco de Crédito for an amount of US$ 10,000 thousand. The fixed interest rate after the swap transaction is 0.624%.
Currency Swap
These derivative instruments were hired by Chinango S.A.C. in order to maintain an appropriate balance between expected cash flows in U.S. dollars (or indexed in dollars) and its financial obligations stated in that currency.
Through these instruments denominated Currency and Interest Rate Swaps, Chinango S.A.C. has exchanged its obligations in soles for obligations in dollars. In this sense, at each due date of the interest period of hedged debts, Chinango S.A.C. pays to the counterpart of the CCIRS the interests on the obligation in dollars at a rate agreed in the CCIRS contract and receives, in turn, the amount in nuevos soles necessary to meet the payment of the interest on the hedged debt in nuevos soles at a rate agreed with the corresponding creditor.
The Subsidiaries evaluate effectiveness of each hedging of derivative instruments at contracting date and have proven their effectiveness as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
F-245
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial derivatives contracted by the Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, their fair value and maturity breakdown, of the face or contractual values is detailed as follows:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2012 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notional value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Before
|
1-2 years |
2-3 years |
3-4 years |
4-5 years |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Interest rate swap |
(7,470 | ) | (28,160 | ) | (25,355 | ) | (32,383 | ) | (32,383 | ) | (47,494 | ) | (165,775 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
- Currency Swap |
3,071 | | 22,393 | | | | 22,393 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notional value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair
|
Before
|
1-2 years |
2-3 years |
3-4 years |
4-5 years |
Subsequent |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedge |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Interest rate swap |
(8,687 | ) | (49,240 | ) | (29,772 | ) | (20,063 | ) | (27,493 | ) | (27,493 | ) | (43,469 | ) | (197,530 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
- Currency Swap |
1,377 | | | 23,675 | | | 23,675 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the payment schedule of the non-current portion of long-term financial liabilities is as follows:
|
In thousands of S/. |
|||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Year 2013 |
| | 140,415 | |||||||||
Year 2014 |
| 139,840 | 136,906 | |||||||||
Year 2015 |
101,231 | 92,394 | 90,939 | |||||||||
Year 2016 |
167,319 | 152,656 | 154,709 | |||||||||
Year 2017 or more |
370,449 | 345,509 | 355,511 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
638,999 | 730,399 | 878,480 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Non Derivative Instrument:
As of December 31, 2013, from the debt in U.S. dollars of Subsidiaries, the amount of S/. 673,812 thousand are related to the future cash flow hedge for the income of the Subsidiaries activities that are related to the U.S. dollar (note 4 (v)). As of December 31, 2012, such amount amounted to S/. 642,219 thousand.
F-246
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2011, from the debt in U.S. dollars of Subsidiaries, the amount of S/. 814,769 thousand are related to the future cash flow hedge for the income of the Subsidiaries activities that are related to the U.S. dollar (note 4 (v)). As of December 31, 2010, such amount amounted to S/. 857,324 thousand.
The exchange difference generated for this debt is presented in the Statement of Changes in Equity in the item Hedge Reserves. The activity during 2013, 2012 and 2011, net of its taxable effect has been as follows:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
2011 |
||||||||||
Balance in net variation reserves for cash flow hedges at the beginning of the period |
87,517 | 70,928 | 55,790 | |||||||||
Translation effect recorded in equity |
(40,982 | ) | 28,303 | 24,325 | ||||||||
Allocation of translation effect transferred to profit or loss |
(10,670 | ) | (11,714 | ) | (9,187 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
35,865 | 87,517 | 70,928 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21) Deferred Income Tax
(a) This caption comprises the following:
F-247
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(b) The composition of the deferred income tax in profit or loss was as follows:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
For temporary differences on income determination |
(38,952 | ) | 9,204 | |||||
For accrual of equity reserves |
22,136 | (6,915 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
(16,816 | ) | 2,289 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(22) Equity
(a) Share capital
As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the share capital of the Company is represented by 853,429,020 common shares fully subscribed and paid with a par value of S/.1.00 per share.
As of December 2013, 2012 and 2011, the shareholding structure of the Company was as follows:
Stockholders |
Class of
|
Number of
|
% |
|||||||||
Endesa Chile S.A. |
A | 520,578,464 | 61.00 | |||||||||
Southern Cone power Perú S.A. |
B | 332,850,556 | 39.00 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
853,429,020 | 100.00 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
F-248
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Both types of shares have the same rights and obligations with the sole exception that Class B shares of the Company are listed in the Lima Stock Exchange.
(b) Other Capital Reserve
According to legal standards in force, the Company is required to allocate a minimum of 10% of the net profit to a legal reserve until it equals 20% of its capital stock. The legal reserve may be used to compensate losses or may be capitalized, being compulsory to refund it in both cases.
General Stockholders Meeting dated March 22, 2013; March 31, 2012 and March 28, 2011, approved to allocate 10% of the profits available for periods 2012, 2011 and 2010, amounting to S/. 10,166, S/. 6,198 and S/. 11,596 thousand, respectively to increase the legal reserve.
(c) Dividends paid
The Company has as policy of dividend and advances payments to distribute total funds received from Subsidiaries for these items, deducting the amount corresponding to operating expenses of the period. In that sense, during 2013, 2012 and 2011, the following dividends were declared:
| At Board of Directors Meeting dated October 17, 2013, it was agreed to pay dividends on account of profit or loss of period 2013 for S/. 38,080 thousand equivalent to S/. 0.044620 cents per share. |
| At Board of Directors Meeting dated July 18, 2013, it was agreed to pay dividends on account of profit or loss of period 2013 for S/. 90,029 thousand equivalent to S/. 0.105491 cents per share. |
| At General Stockholders Meeting, held on March 22, 2013, an agreement was reached to distribute dividends amounting to S/. 54,394 thousand equivalent to S/. 0.063736 cents per share. |
| At Board of Directors Meeting dated October 18, 2012, it was agreed to pay dividends on account of profit or loss of period 2012 for S/. 27,690 thousand equivalent to S/. 0.032446 cents per share. |
| At Board of Directors Meeting dated July 19, 2012, it was agreed to pay dividends on account of profit or loss of period 2012 for S/. 66,800 thousand equivalent to S/. 0.078272 cents per share. |
| At General Stockholders Meeting, held on March 31, 2012, an agreement was reached to distribute dividends amounting to S/. 6,938 thousand equivalent to S/. 0.008129 cents per share. |
| At Board of Directors Meeting dated October 28, 2011, it was agreed to pay dividends on account of profit or loss of period 2011 for S/. 26,990 thousand equivalent to S/. 0.031625 cents per share. |
| At Board of Directors Meeting dated July 21, 2011, it was agreed to pay dividends on account of profit or loss of period 2011 for S/. 74,812 thousand equivalent to S/. 0.087660 cents per share. |
| At General Stockholders Meeting, held on March 28, 2011, an agreement was reached to distribute dividends amounting to S/. 23,811 thousand equivalent to S/. 0.0279 cents per share. |
Dividends paid to individuals and non-domiciled legal entities in Peru are subject to a withdrawal of 4.1%.
F-249
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(23) Sales Income:
This caption comprises the following:
(24) Generation Costs
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Natural gas supply, transport and distribution |
276,158 | 273,211 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization (note 27) |
206,962 | 207,905 | ||||||
Impairment of machine and equipment |
36,006 | | ||||||
Purchase of energy, power and toll (a) |
131,945 | 222,463 | ||||||
Services rendered by third parties (b) |
57,025 | 54,976 | ||||||
Water royalties and electricity taxes |
21,618 | 22,853 | ||||||
Personnel expenses (note 26) |
39,040 | 36,573 | ||||||
Consumption of various supplies |
14,087 | 13,592 | ||||||
Various charges for operations |
46,582 | 25,602 | ||||||
Compensation for additional generation |
41,671 | 39,549 | ||||||
Consumption of oil |
8,602 | 28,119 | ||||||
Taxes |
3,463 | 3,449 | ||||||
Other |
3,530 | 1,307 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
886,689 | 929,599 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | It includes purchases to related entities (note 8 (d)). |
(b) | It includes services rendered by related entities for S/. 521 thousand (S/. 388 during period 2012). |
F-250
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(25) Administrative Expenses
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Personnel expenses (note 26) |
31,094 | 30,345 | ||||||
Services rendered by third parties (a) |
13,356 | 11,596 | ||||||
Taxes |
1,863 | 1,732 | ||||||
Various charges for operations |
3,046 | 2,788 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization (note 27) |
2,659 | 2,614 | ||||||
Tax sanctions |
289 | | ||||||
Other |
1,013 | 1,478 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
53,320 | 50,553 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(a) | It includes services rendered by related parties for S/. 1,701 thousand (S/. 1,389 during period 2012). |
(26) Personnel Expenses
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Remunerations |
29,691 | 31,478 | ||||||
Workers Profit Sharing |
28,674 | 26,107 | ||||||
Social contributions |
3,781 | 3,432 | ||||||
Vacations |
3,569 | 2,190 | ||||||
Others |
4,419 | 3,711 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
70,134 | 66,918 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
Personnel expenses are distributed as follows:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Generation costs (note 24) |
39,040 | 36,573 | ||||||
Administrative expenses (note 25) |
31,094 | 30,345 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
70,134 | 66,918 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
F-251
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(27) Depreciation and Amortization
This caption comprises the following:
(28) Other Operating Income
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Reimbursement for material damages and income loss (note 9 and 13 (g)) |
103,511 | | ||||||
Administrative services to related parties |
3,021 | 2,425 | ||||||
Profit on sale of property, plant, and equipment |
196 | 3,052 | ||||||
Operating and maintenance services |
1,601 | | ||||||
Transfer of natural gas transport capacity |
3,299 | 2,974 | ||||||
Service of network movements |
3,683 | 1,329 | ||||||
Other Income |
3,901 | 2,810 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
119,212 | 12,590 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(29) Finance Income and Costs
This caption comprises the following:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Interest on bank deposits |
4,853 | 6,634 | ||||||
Other |
115 | 72 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
4,968 | 6,706 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
F-252
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Financial costs comprise:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Unwinding of the discount of provisions (note 34) |
299 | 3,248 | ||||||
Interest on bonds |
24,746 | 30,662 | ||||||
Interest on bank loans |
9,971 | 11,122 | ||||||
Interest on leasing |
3,670 | 4,894 | ||||||
Loss for derivative instruments |
2,585 | 3,208 | ||||||
Other |
2,365 | 1,635 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
43,636 | 54,769 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
(30) Income tax
Below there is the income tax expense shown in the consolidated statement of income as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Current |
184,542 | 175,060 | ||||||
Deferred |
(16,816 | ) | 2,289 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
167,726 | 177,349 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of effective rates of Income Tax as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 to the tax rate is as follows:
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||||||||||
En miles
|
% |
En miles
|
% |
|||||||||||||
Profit before income tax |
622,091 | 100.00 | 563,414 | 100.00 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income tax calculated as per tax rate |
186,627 | 30.00 | 169,024 | 30.00 | ||||||||||||
Tax effect on additions and deductions |
1,157 | 0.19 | 8,325 | 1.48 | ||||||||||||
Reimbursement for material damages |
(20,058 | ) | (4.41 | ) | | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Gasto registrado por impuesto a las ganancias |
167,726 | 25.78 | 177,349 | 31.48 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31) Earnings per Share
Calculation of basic and diluted earnings attributable to controlling interests as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is presented as follows:
In thousands of S/. |
||||||||
2013 |
2012 |
|||||||
Profit |
239,878 | 201,703 | ||||||
Nº of shares (in thousands) |
853,429 | 853,429 | ||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share |
0.281 | 0.236 |
F-253
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(32) Tax Matters
(a) | Companys income and sales tax returns for years 2009 through 2013 are open to review by tax authorities. |
The income tax returns for fiscal years 2010 through 2013 of Edegel S.A.A. are open for review by the Peruvian tax authorities. The Tax Authority has reviewed periods until 2008, giving notice of the corresponding determination resolutions and fine for periods 2007 and 2008 to the Subsidiary. The Subsidiary has appealed the resolution corresponding to period 2007 and claiming for those corresponding to period 2008. Currently, the Tax Authority is reviewing the Income Tax and Sales Tax of period 2009.
Likewise, the Tax Authority has reviewed the Income Tax of periods 2010 and 2011 of Chinango S.A.C. issuing the corresponding determination and fine resolutions of period 2010 which are appealed by the Subsidiary. For 2011, the Subsidiary is waiting for the issuance of the corresponding resolutions. Tax obligations related to the income tax of periods 2009, 2012 and 2013 and sales tax corresponding to periods 2009 to 2013 have a pending tax inspection by the Tax Authority.
Any major expenses exceeding the provisions made to cover the tax obligations will be charged to the results of the period in which those expenses are finally settled. It is the opinion of the Companys management and its Subsidiaries that, as a result of this review, no significant liabilities will affect the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
In accordance with current tax legislation, corporate income tax for the years 2013 and 2012 is calculated on the basis of the net taxable income at a rate of 30% over the net taxable profit (after deducting the expense for workers profit sharing calculated with a rate of 5%).
(b) | For income tax purposes, the market value of the transactions between related parties shall be determined based on transfer pricing standards. These standards define, among others, coverage, relationship criteria, as well as comparability analysis, methodology, adjustments and information. The standards establish that under certain conditions, companies are required to have a Technical Study Report supporting the calculation of transfer pricing with related parties. Likewise, this obligation is required for all transactions made from, towards or through territories with low or null taxation. |
The Companys management and its Subsidiaries consider that for income, sales, and excise tax purposes, pricing regarding transactions such as those aforementioned has been made in accordance with tax legislation; consequently, no significant liabilities will arise as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.
(c) | The total or partial distribution of dividends, or other types of profit distributed by entities domiciled in Peru, is subject to a 4.1% income tax, except for the distribution of profits made in favor of another entity domiciled in the Peru. |
(d) | In 2005, a temporary tax on net assets (ITAN, for its Spanish acronym) was established. The taxable base is the prior period adjusted net asset value less depreciations, amortizations, legal cash reserve, and specific provisions for credit risk. The tax rate is 0.4% for years 2013 and 2012 and is applied to the amount of net assets exceeding S/. 1 million. It may be paid in cash or in nine consecutive monthly installments. The paid amount can be used as a credit for partial payments of income tax general regime for the taxable periods from March to December of the fiscal period in which the tax was paid until maturity date of each of the partial payment, and against the payment for regularization of income tax of the corresponding taxable period. |
F-254
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(e) | Technical assistance provided by non-domiciled entities will be subject to a 15% withholding income tax, regardless of the place where the service is rendered, and subject to compliance with the Income Tax Law requirements. |
(f) | Tax on Financial Transactions (ITF) for fiscal period 2013 was fixed at the rate of 0.005%. This tax is applied on charges and debits in bank accounts or movements of funds made through the financial system, unless the account is tax-exempt. |
(33) Commitments
The Subsidiaries have the following commitments as of December 31, 2013; these commitments are not for a fixed price.
(a) Electricity Supply Contracts
Contracts with Regulated Clients:
Client |
Beginning |
Ending |
Energy Supply contracted |
|||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 30.8 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 28.2 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 28.2 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.9 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 28.7 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 166.7 MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 24.8 MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 23.9 MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 23.9 MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.7 MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 23.1 MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 134.1 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 1.7 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 3.2 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 3.2 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.1 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 3.4 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 19.8 MW | |||
Edecañete S.A.A (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.74 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 2.5 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 4.4 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 4.4 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.1 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 4.5 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 26.0 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 2.7 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 2.9 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 2.9 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.1 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 3.0 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 17.4 MW |
F-255
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Client |
Beginning |
Ending |
Energy Supply contracted |
|||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 4.5 MW | |||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 5.3 MW | |||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 5.3 MW | |||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.2 MW | |||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 4.9 MW | |||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 28.6 MW | |||
Hidrandina S.A. |
9/1/2012 | 12/31/2015 | Up to 33.2 MW in 2012 | |||
Up to 20.9 MW in 2013 | ||||||
Up to 110.3 MW in 2014 | ||||||
Up to 48.2 MW in 2015 | ||||||
Electrocentro S.A. |
9/1/2012 | 12/31/2015 | Up to 10.0 MW in 2012 | |||
Up to 12.5 MW in 2013 | ||||||
Up to 54.0 MW in 2014 | ||||||
Up to 14.6 MW in 2015 | ||||||
Electronoroeste S.A. |
6/1/2014 | 12/31/2014 | Up to 39.0 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. |
1/1/2016 | 12/31/2027 | 67.8 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 6.3 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 5.8 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 5.8 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 5.5 MW | |||
Edelnor S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 34.1MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 5.1 MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 4.9 MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 4.9 MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 4.4 MW | |||
Luz del Sur S.A.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 27.5 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.3 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.7 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.7 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.7 MW | |||
Electrosur S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 7.1 MW | |||
Edecañete S.A.A (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.2 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.5 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.9 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.9 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.9 MW | |||
Electrosureste S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 5.3 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.6 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.6 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 0.6 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.6 MW | |||
Electropuno S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 3.6 MW | |||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2021 | Up to 0.9 MW | |||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 1.0 MW | |||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2023 | Up to 1.0 MW | |||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 0.9 MW | |||
Seal S.A. (LP) |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 5.9 MW |
F-256
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Contracts with Free Market Clients:
Client |
Beginning |
Ending |
Energy Supply Contracted |
|||
Empresa Siderúrgica del Perú S.A. |
5/8/1997 | 12/31/2017 | 55 MW in HFP, 13 MW in HP since February 2009. | |||
Votorantim Metais -
|
2/1/2001 | 2/28/2017 | 60 MW in HP, 125 MW in HFP. | |||
Votorantim Metais -
|
9/1/2009 | 8/31/2019 | 10 MW in HP and 57 MW in HFP. | |||
Compañía Minera Antamina S.A. |
5/27/1999 | 12/31/2014 |
Up to a maximum of 121.5 MW until the termination of the contract |
|||
Industrias Electroquímicas S.A. |
10/1/2005 | 12/31/2014 | Up to 2.7 MW | |||
Tejidos San Jacinto S.A. |
5/1/2011 | 4/30/2016 | Up to 7.5 MW | |||
Compañía Textil Credisa
|
8/1/2010 | 12/31/2015 | Up to 12.0 MW | |||
Moly-Cop Adesur S.A. |
4/1/2010 | 3/31/2020 | Up to 2.0 MW in HP and 16.0 | |||
MW in HFP in Lima | ||||||
Up to 0.2 MW in HP and 11.0 | ||||||
MW in HFP in Arequipa | ||||||
Compañía Minera Antamina S.A. |
7/1/2011 | 12/31/2014 | Up to 30 MW | |||
Minera Chinalco Perú S.A. |
10/1/2011 | 9/30/2026 | Up to 166 MW | |||
Compañía Minera Casapalca S.A. |
3/1/2012 | 12/31/2017 | 14 MW in HP and HFP. | |||
Shougang Hierro Perú S.A.A. |
5/1/2014 | 12/31/2020 |
Up to 70 MW during period 2014-2017 |
|||
100 MW in 2018-2019 | ||||||
110 MW in 2020. | ||||||
Praxair Perú S.R.L.
|
9/7/2012 | 12/31/2019 | 2.8 MW | |||
Shopping Center S.A. |
11/1/2012 | 10/31/2015 | Up to 14.5 MW | |||
La Arena S.A. |
1/1/2014 | 12/31/2028 | Up to 30.0 MW | |||
Hudbay Perú S.A.C. |
5/1/2014 | 12/31/2025 | Up to 90.0 MW | |||
Banco Interbank |
3/1/2003 | 4/30/2014 |
Total agreed maximum demand of 2.5 MW |
(b) Natural Gas Supply Contract from Camisea Deposits
By means of the assignment of contractual position agreement, Electroperú S.A. transferred to Empresa de Generación Eléctrica Ventanilla S.A.-ETEVENSA (Etevensa), effective from August 1, 2003, its contractual position in the Contract for Natural Gas Supply (hereinafter the Contract) entered into between companies that are part of the Contractor in charge of the exploitation of hydrocarbons in Camisea deposits (hereinafter the Contractor). These companies expressed their total and absolute agreement with such assignment. Under the takeover of Etevensa by Edegel S.A.A. from June 1, 2006, Edegel S.A.A. acquired the rights and obligations of Etevensa in the Contract.
The Contract binds upon Edegel S.A.A. to exclusively acquire gas from the Contractor until the maximum daily amount established in 3.901MM mcd for power plants of Ventanilla and Santa Rosa. Likewise, the Contract binds upon Edegel S.A.A. to pay a minimum of 100% of the daily contractual quantity (2.50MM mcd from August 21, 2013; this quantity increased in 2.30MMmcd).
F-257
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The purchase price is fixed at the point of receipt (Las Malvinas- Camisea) and is expressed in US$/MMBTU (dollars per million BTU). Effectiveness of this contract is 15 years from August 20, 2004.
The cost of natural gas supply as of December 31, 2013 amounted to S/. 140,595 thousand (S/. 141,216 as of December 31, 2012, S/. 149,310 as of December 31, 2011 and S/. 130, 360 as of December 31, 2010).
(c) Natural Gas Transport Contracts
On May 2, 2005, Edegel S.A.A. entered into with Transportadora de Gas del Perú S.A. (hereinafter TGP) a Contract for Interruptible Natural Gas Transport Service with the intention that TGP renders services from the point of receipt located in Las Malvinas (Camisea) to the point of delivery in the City Gate of Lurin. This contract will be effective until January 1, 2034.
The maximum daily interruptible quantity (MIQ) that TGP is obliged to transport is the following:
Period |
MIQ
|
|||
- |
||||
- From August 14, 2010 to December 31, 2019 |
992,624 | |||
- From January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2025 |
1,000,000 | |||
- From January 1, 2026 to January 1, 2034 |
3,100,000 |
On the other hand, on December 10, 2007, Edegel S.A.A. has signed the Firm Transport Service Contract with TGP with the intention that it renders such service from August 1, 2008 to December 31, 2025.
The daily reserved capacity amounts to the following values:
Period |
DRC
(m3 td/day) |
|||
- |
||||
- From August 14, 2010 to August 1, 2019 |
3,207,376 | |||
- From August 2, 2019 to January 1, 2020 |
2,589,554 | |||
- From January 2, 2020 to December 31, 2025 |
2,100,000 |
The consideration of the service to which the above mentioned interruptible and firm contracts refer is calculated based on tariffs regulated by the Supervisory Entity for Investment in Energy and Mining (OSINERGMIN) applied on gas volumes effectively transported in the case of the interruptible service contract and the reserved volume in the case of the firm service contract.
Cost for these services as of December 31, 2013 amounted to S/. 115,796 thousand (S/. 112,328 as of December 31, 2012, S/. 111,372 as of December 31, 2011 and S/. 102,184 as of December 31, 2010) and is recorded in the Cost of Generation item.
(d) Natural Gas Supply Contract
On August 27, 2004, ETEVENSA, currently Edegel S.A.A. entered into with Gas Natural de Lima y Callao S.R.L. (hereinafter GNLC) the Contract for Interruptible Natural Gas Transport Service through the Main Distribution Network from the point of receipt located in the City Gate of Lurin to the point of delivery in the Thermoelectric Plant of Ventanilla. This Contract has a term of effectiveness of 15 years from the date of signing.
F-258
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The maximum daily interruptible capacity (MIC) of gas that GNLC is obliged to transport is:
Period |
MIC
|
|||
- From August 1, 2009 to August 22, 2019 |
100,000 |
Likewise, on May 20, 2005, GNLC and Edegel S.A.A. signed other Contract for Interruptible Natural Gas Transport Service through the Main Distribution Network from the point of receipt located in the City Gate of Lurin to the point of delivery in the Thermoelectric Plant of Santa Rosa (Interruptible Service Contract Santa Rosa). This contract will be effective until Tuesday, December 31, 2019.
The maximum daily interruptible capacity (MIC) of gas that GNLC is obliged to transport is:
Period |
MIC (m3 td/day) |
|||
- From March 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019 |
900,000 |
On September 22, 2008 and within the Eleventh Public Auction for Contracting of Firm Service and called for the Contracting of the Interruptible Service of Natural Gas Transport through the Main Distribution Network, GNLC and Edegel S.A.A. signed the following Firm Service Contracts for the plants of Santa Rosa and Ventanilla.
The daily reserved capacity of gas that GNLC is obliged to transport is:
Period |
DRC
(m3 td/day) |
|||
Point of Delivery: Ventanilla. |
||||
- From August 1, 2009 to December 31, 2025 |
2,100,000 | |||
Point of Delivery: Santa Rosa. |
||||
- From March 1, 2010 to December 31, 2019 |
1,100,000 |
The consideration of services to which the above mentioned contracts refer is calculated based on tariffs regulated by the Supervisory Entity for Investment in Energy and Mining (OSINERGMIN) applied on gas volumes effectively transported in the case of the interruptible service contract and the reserved volume in the case of the firm service contract.
Cost for these services as of December 31, 2013 amounted to S/. 19,767 thousand (S/. 19,668 as of December 31, 2012, S/. 19,371 as of December 31, 2011 and S/. 19,027 as of December 31, 2010) and is recorded in the Cost of Generation item.
(e) Long-term Contracts for the acquisition of replacement parts and rendering of maintenance services for Thermal Plants
On May 28, 2004, Empresa de Generación Termoeléctrica Ventanilla S.A.ETEVENSA (Etevensa) signed a long-term service agreement (LTSA) with Siemens Westinghouse Power Corporation (currently Siemens Energy Inc.) and Siemens Westinghouse Service Company LTD (its rights and obligations have been assigned to Siemens S.A.C.) for the acquisition of replacement parts and spare parts, as well as for rendering scheduled maintenance services (major and minor) for the two turbines of the Thermoelectric Power Plant in Ventanilla. The LTSA referred to the Ventanilla Plant became effective on the date of signing and will be in
F-259
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
force until: (a) each turbine of the Thermoelectric Power Plant of Ventanilla accumulates 108,333 HES; or (b) 18 years are reached from the date of beginning of the commercial operation of the natural gas plant, whichever occurs first.
Likewise, on June 15, 2005, Edegel S.A.A. signed a similar contract with the same companies for the acquisition of replacement parts and spare parts, as well as for rendering scheduled maintenance services (minor and major) for the turbine Westinghouse located in the Thermoelectric Power Plant of Santa Rosa. The LTSA referred to the turbine Westinghouse of Santa Rosa began operations on June 1, 2005 and will be in force until: (a) the turbine Westinghouse of the Thermoelectric Power Plant Santa Rosa accumulates 96,000 HES; or (b) 18 years are reached since June 1, 2005; or, (c) two high inspections and two hot gas path inspections are carried out as defined in the contract, whichever occurs first. Due to the claim occurred in May 2013 (note 13(g)) affecting this turbine, the Contract is still suspended as of December 31, 2013.
On the other hand, on March 27, 2009, Siemens Power Generation, Inc. (currently Siemens Energy Inc.) and Siemens Power Generation Service Company, Ltd. (its rights and obligations are currently assigned to Siemens S.A.C.) entered into with Edegel S.A.A. other LTSA for the acquisition of spare parts and replacement parts, as well as for rendering scheduled maintenance services (minor and major) for the Siemens turbine installed in the Thermoelectric Power Plant of Santa Rosa. The LTSA referred to the Siemens turbine of Santa Rosa began operations on the date of signing and will be in force until: (a) the turbine Siemens of the Thermoelectric Power Plant Santa Rosa accumulates 100,000 HES; or (b) 18 years are reached since the date of signing; or, (c) two high inspections and two hot gas path inspections are carried out as defined in the contract, whichever occurs first.
The contracts establish various forms of payment such as an initial payment for spare parts and equipments specified in the pertinent agreements, monthly payments based on an accumulation schedule of equivalent service hours for each turbine, monthly fixed payments for turbines, payment as per schedule specified for minor and major scheduled maintenance services, as per the accumulation of equivalent service hours and monthly payment for maintenance services of the control system of gas turbines of each contract.
(f) Fuel Supply Contract for Thermal Plants
On September 7, 009, Edegel S.A.A. entered into with Petróleos del PerúPetroperú S.A. (Petroperú) a supply contract of Biodiesel B2 GE or other similar fuel destined to Thermal Plants effective for one renewable year. By means of communications between the parties, effectiveness was extended for three years and was formalized through an addendum dated December 13, 2010, including the automatic renewal if no prior notice is given.
According to the signed contract, Petroperu assumes the commitment to deliver a monthly volume of 20,000 barrels (free volume) or any other volume higher than the latter of firm nature that Edegel S.A.A. has requested with prior notice of 60 days. If Edegel S.A.A. does not comply with the purchase of firm requested volume, it will be subject to the payment of a penalty in favor of PETROPERU to indemnify its financing and storage costs.
According to medium-term operation contracts of COES (September 2010- August 2011), the operation of thermal units of Edegel S.A.A. with diesel was not necessary, except for specific cases (peak demand, failures in other system units, etc, for which no penalties were paid.
F-260
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(g) Joint Collateral Agreements in favor of Chinango S.A.C.
In May 2009, Edegel S.A.A. granted an irrevocable joint collateral of automatic execution in favor of Bondholders of the First Bond Program Chinango (formerly called Second Bond Program Edegel) to guarantee the payment of obligations issued under this program that were transferred by Edegel S.A.A. to Chinango S.A.C. under the corporate reorganization held on May 31, 2009. The balance of such obligations as of the date of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position amounts to S/. 25,075 thousand.
(34) Contingencies
As of December 31, 2013, the Company and its Subsidiaries have a pending solution of court and arbitration proceedings, as well as administrative and tax procedures related to the developed activities. In management and its internal and external legal advisors opinion, the Company has recorded the liabilities considered as appropriate based on the information available as of December 31, 2013, and those will not result in liabilities additional to those already recorded by the Company and its Subsidiaries (note 18).
The main contingencies are:
(a) Income Tax Assessments for periods 2000 and 2001
As a result of the tax inspection of the income tax of periods 2000 and 2001, on December 28, 2005, Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions amounting to S/. 75,892 thousand (including fines and interests calculated as of that date) for alleged omissions in the income tax payment of period 2000. Likewise, on that date Edegel S.A.A. was notified through different tax assessment resolutions amounting to approximately S/. 6,842 thousand corresponding to default interests related to payment on account of Income Tax of period 2001.
In January 2006, the Subsidiary filed a partial appeal against such tax assessment and fine resolutions paying the tax corresponding to not claimed items. In September 2008, the Tax Authority notified the subsidiary through an Intendency Resolution through which the field claim was declared grounded.
In October 2008, the Subsidiary filed an appeal against such Intendency Resolution before the Tax Court. The main objections of the Tax Authority that have been subject to appeal are the following:
(i) | S/. 44,025 thousand of objections of the taxable base for depreciation of revalued fixed assets in period 1996. |
(ii) | S/. 12,574 thousand of objections of the taxable base for finance costs related to loans that the Tax Authority assumes that were used for the purchase of shares of own issuance; therefore, they do not comply with the principle of causality. |
(iii) | S/. 5,673 thousand of objections of the taxable base for negative Inflation Exposure Results of period 2001. |
The challenged contingency updated as of December 31, 2013 amounts to S/. 98,957 thousand (including taxes, fines and interests calculated as of that date).
As of December 31, 2013, the appeal filed by the Subsidiary has pending resolution by the Tax Court.
F-261
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In opinion of the Subsidiarys Management and its Legal Advisors, there is a high probability of success concerning challenged items, except for the portion that already has a provision amounting to S/. 2,601 thousand as of December 31, 2013 (note 18).
(b) Income Tax Assessments for periods 2002 and 2003
In July 2007, Edegel S.A.A. was notified by the Tax Authority through various Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions amounting to S/. 10,224 thousand (including taxes, fines, as well as interests calculated as of that date) for the income tax of periods 2002 and 2003.
The Subsidiary accepted some objections paying the corresponding debt and in August 2007 it claimed before the Tax Authority those amounts that were not accepted.
By means of Intendency Resolution 01501140007736 dated October 2008 the above mentioned claim was partially grounded and it was established to continue with the collection of the amended debt amounting to S/. 3,154 thousand.
In December 2008, the Subsidiary filed a partial appeal against the mentioned Intendency Resolution. The appeal was mainly related to the objection for exchange difference and interests arising from credits acquired to refinance the debt that was subject to objections in periods 2000 and 2001 because they were allegedly related to the purchase of shares of own issuance.
The contingency related to this tax assessments, updated as of December 31, 2013 amounted to S/. 5,627 thousand (including taxes, fines and interests calculated as of that date).
As of December 31, 2013, the appeal filed by the Subsidiary has pending resolution by the Tax Court.
In opinion of the Subsidiaries management and its legal advisors the appeal has probabilities to succeed.
(c) Income Tax Assessments for period 2006
In April 2011, Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions related to alleged omissions in the income tax determination of period 2006 (annual and payments on account) and the alleged infringement committed of article 178.1 of the Tax Code (declare figures or false data that have influence in the determination of the tax obligation).
In May 2011, the Subsidiary filed a partial appeal against these resolutions. On the same date, a debt payment was made related to payments on account for January and February 2006.
On March 6, 2012, the Subsidiary was notified through Intendency Resolution 0150140010139 for which the Tax Authority declared the claim groundless. Such Resolution was appealed by the Subsidiary through appeal filed on March 27, 2012.
The contingency related to this tax assessments, updated as of December 31, 2013 amounted to S/. 29,523 thousand (including taxes, fines and interests calculated as of that date).
As of December 31, 2013, the appeal filed by the Subsidiary has pending resolution by the Tax Court.
F-262
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In opinion of the Subsidiaries management and its legal advisors the appeal has probabilities to succeed.
(d) Income Tax Assessment for period 2007
In May 2013, Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions related to income tax determination and payments on account of period 2007 and the alleged committed infringement of article 178.1 of the Tax Code (declare figures or false data that have influence in the determination of the tax obligation).
The Tax Authority determined a lower balance in favor of period 2007 for income tax, as well as higher payments on account and their respective fines as a result of the higher income tax determined in 2006 and that has influence on the determination of the credit balance and payments on account of period 2007.
On June 18, 2013, the Subsidiary filed an appeal against such resolutions which was declared groundless by the Tax Authority through Intendency Resolution 0150140010970 notified on October 10, 2013.
The contingency related to this tax assessments, updated as of December 31, 2013 amounted to S/. 11,588 thousand (including interests payable on account, fines and interests calculated as of that date).
In opinion of the Subsidiaries management and its legal advisors the appeal has probabilities to succeed.
(e) Income Tax Assessment for period 2008
In November 2013, Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Tax Assessment and Fine Resolutions related to income tax and payments on account of period 2008 and the alleged infringement committed of article 178.1 of the Tax Code (declare figures or false data that have influence in the determination of the tax obligation).
The Tax Authority determined a lower balance in favor of period 2008 for income tax, as well as higher payments on account and their respective fines as a result of the higher income tax determined in 2006 and 2007 and that have influence on the determination of the credit balance and payments on account of period 2008.
On December 16, 2013, the Subsidiary filed a claim against such resolutions.
The contingency related to this tax assessments updated as of December 31, 2013 amounts to S/. 4,223 thousand (including interests of payments on account, fines and fine interests, calculated as of that date).
As of December 31, 2013, the claim filed by the Subsidiary has pending resolution by the Tax Authority.
In opinion of the Subsidiaries management and its legal advisors the claim has probabilities to succeed.
(f) Assessment for Sales Tax, Municipal Promotion Tax and Ad Valorem of years 2008 and 2009.
In December 2013, Scotiabank Perú S.A.A. with which Edegel S.A.A. has signed a leasing contract referred to the project Santa Rosa was notified through Division Resolutions through which the Tax Authority put under collection (i) S/. 4,605 thousand, for taxes (sales tax, Tax Municipal Promotion and Ad Valorem) that were not paid in various custom declarations, (ii) S/.9,210 thousand for a fine equivalent to the double taxation that was allegedly not paid and, (iii) S/.710, for a fine equivalent to 0.2 tax units in force in 2009, for an alleged incorrect statement of the value in Custom Declarations.
F-263
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Such Tax Assessments are related to Customs Declarations issued for the execution of the Turnkey Contract for the project Santa Rosa signed between Siemens Power Generation Inc. and the Subsidiary and subsequently by Scotiabank Perú S.A.A. which was joined as owner of goods to which such contract is subject. Tax Assessments from the Tax Authority are as follows: (i) engineering services rendered abroad by Siemens Power Generation Inc. under the above mentioned contract, should take part of the custom value of imported products, and (ii) the amount of the bond for higher performance of Santa Rosa paid to Siemens Power Generation Inc. should have been added to such value.
Scotiabank Perú S.A.A. shall file a claim no later than January 7, 2014.
The contingency related to this tax assessments updated as of December 31, 2013 amounts to S/. 19,047 thousand (including taxes, fines and interests calculated as of that date).
(g) Claims with ESSALUD (former IPSS)
(i) | Process referred to alleged debts for non-compliance with the payment of contributions to health systems of Decree Law 22482, Decree Law pensions 19990, workplace accidents and occupational disease of Decree Law 18846 during the period from April 1994 and March 1996, for the amount of S/. 8,203 thousand (including interest calculated until June 1996). |
In January 2010, Edegel S.A.A. was notified through Resolution 802-14-0020026 dated December 28, 2009, which declared that the claim related to the payment of contributions to the health system, workplace accidents and occupational disease was groundless; thus, ordering continued collections. Likewise, ESSALUD declared that the claim related to the pension system was inadmissible since it was within the scope of the National Pension Office (ONP). On January 27, 2010, the Subsidiary filed an appeal for reconsideration against such Resolution.
In December 2010, the Subsidiary was notified through Resolution 806-15-000-1286, through which ESSALUD declared partially founded the appeal filed, ordering the Subsidiary the payment of a debt amounting to S/.1,834 thousand (including interests).
In December 2010, the Subsidiary made the payment ordering such Resolution.
In January 2011, the Subsidiary filed to ESSALUD a written document communicating the payment of debt and requesting (i) Declaration of total and full payment of debts, (ii) lack of any other debt derived from the inspection process and, (iii) the final document of the file.
The Subsidiary is waiting for the Resolution of ESSALUD that responds to the above mentioned written document.
(ii) | Claim referred to payment orders through which it is intended to collect to Edegel S.A.A. the alleged omission in the payment of contributions to ESSALUD, during the period from April 1997 to December 1998. |
The total alleged debt that amounted to S/. 2,881 thousand as of April 2001, arises from: (a) ESSALUD has adopted, amounts exceeding those shown in the Tax Returns of Employees filed by the Subsidiary as taxable base for the calculation of contributions, and (b) in order to calculate contributions, ESSALUD has applied the rate of 9% for all the inspected period, without considering that, in application of legal provisions in force as of the date of the accrual of contributions, the applicable percentage was 1.8% from April 1997 to May 1997 and 6.75% from May 1997 to September 1997.
F-264
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In opinion of the Subsidiarys Management and its legal advisors, it is probable to obtain a favorable result concerning the taxable base that shall be used to calculate contributions since the amount declared by the Subsidiary conforms to remunerations effectively received by employees. On the other hand, concerning the applicable percentage, it shall be necessary to obtain a favorable result concerning periods between April and May 1997 and from September 1997 to December 1998, which will decrease the contingency in S/. 1,021 thousand plus interests.
The provision recorded by the Subsidiary, for both processes, as of December 31, 2013 amounts to S/. 6,888 thousand (note 18).
(h) Property Tax Assessment of Periods 2000 to 2004
The District Municipality of San Ramon notified the Subsidiary Edegel S.A.A. through Tax Assessment Resolution 02-2005-OR-MDSR and Fine Resolution 01-2005-OR-MDSR for which the amount of S/. 3,388 thousand was subject to collection for Property Tax of periods 2000 to 2004 and S/. 26 thousand for fine, including both default interest calculated as of January 14, 2005. The Municipality supports the tax assessment when including in the taxable base, movable property and investments in land of third parties.
In June 2005, the Subsidiary filed an appeal against above mentioned resolutions based on the fact that the Property and Fine Tax corresponding to period 2000 are prescribed and that, concerning other periods, the taxable base assumed by the Municipality considers elements that are not adjusted to law provisions.
To this process, claims filed by the Subsidiary concerning Tax Assessment Resolutions 003-2005-OR-MDSR and 004-2005-OR-MDSR for which the Municipality of San Ramón requested the payment of Work Compliance Rates and Planning Application, respectively, amounting to S/. 258 thousand, each of them.
To date, the District Municipality of San Ramon has not complied with filling the proceedings to the Tax Court so that the entity decides on the appeal filed by the Subsidiary. This arose, although the above mentioned Municipality obtains an unfavorable result in the legal proceedings initiated by them through which it was expected to declare invalidity of the Resolutions of the Tax Court which require filing the proceedings.
In opinion of the Subsidiarys Management and its Legal Advisors, there are high probabilities to obtain a favorable result concerning the tax assessment of period 2000 for the prescribed year. Likewise, there are also high probabilities of success concerning the contingency associated to the valuation of property made by the Municipality and its inclusion within the taxable base for the tax determination of periods 2001 to 2004. On the other hand, concerning the claim related to the inclusion of investments in land of third parties within the taxable base for the tax determination of periods 2001 to 2004, the contingency has been classified as probable, reason why the provision recorded by the Subsidiary as of September 30, 2013 amounts to S/. 3,470 thousand (note 18).
(i) Fine associated to the Real Estate Transfer Tax of year 2009 imposed by the District Municipality of San Ramon
In October 2010, the District Municipality of San Ramon notified Chinango S.A.C. through the Fine Resolution 049-2010/MDSR for which the amount of S/. 977 thousand was subject to collection for allegedly having incurred in the infraction standardized in paragraph 1 of article 178° of the Tax Code (declare false figures or data that have influence in the determination of the tax obligation).
In November 2010, the Subsidiary filed a claim against the above mentioned resolution, stating that it is no longer appropriate since there is no obligation of submitting a Real Estate Transfer Tax return.
F-265
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In April 2011, the Subsidiary was notified through Management Resolution 113-2011-GR-MDSR through which the District Municipality of San Ramon declared inadmissible the dispute of tax assessment. The Subsidiary filed an appeal against Management Resolution requesting the Municipality to resolve the claim, since it was submitted under legal established terms.
In July 2011, the Subsidiary was notified through Municipal Management Resolution 090-2011-GEMU-MDSR through which General Management Resolution 113-2011-GR-MDSR was declared invalid.
The contingency updated as of December 31, 2013 amounts to S/. 1,644 thousand.
As of December 31, 2013, the claim filed by the Subsidiary has pending resolution by the above mentioned Municipality.
In opinion of the Subsidiaries management and its legal advisors, there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(j) Real Estate Transfer Tax Assessment of year 2009 imposed by the District Municipality of San Ramon:
In April 2013, the District Municipality of San Ramon notified Chinango S.A.C. through various Tax Assessment Resolutions for which an alleged debt of real estate transfer tax was subject to collection. It taxed the transfer of certain assets in the simple reorganization carried out between Edegel S.A.A. and Chinango S.A.C. in May 2009.
In May 2013, Chinango S.A.C filed a claim against the above mentioned Resolutions which was resolved in September 2013 through Management Resolution which declared the invalidity of Tax Assessment Resolutions challenged and ordered the conduction of a new tax inspection.
Such tax inspection was carried out during September, October and November 2013, having that in this last month, the Municipality notified the Subsidiary through a Tax Assessment Resolution for which an alleged omitted tax amounting to S/. 1,689 thousand was subject under collection.
In December 2013, the Subsidiary filed a claim against the new Tax Assessment Resolution which was resolved in that same month through Management Resolution. This last Resolution declared groundless the claim. The Subsidiary filed an appeal against Management Resolution under the legal established term.
The contingency updated as of December 31, 2013 amounts to S/. 2,629 thousand.
In opinion of the Subsidiaries management and its legal advisors there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(k) Real Estate Transfer Tax Assessment of year 2009 imposed by the District Municipality of Monobamba:
In May 2013, the District Municipality of Monobamba notified Chinango S.A.C through various Tax Assessment Resolutions for which an alleged debt of real estate transfer tax was subject to collection. It taxed the transfer of certain assets in the simple reorganization carried out between Edegel S.A.A. and Chinango S.A.C. in May 2009.
F-266
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
In June 2013, Chinango S.A.C filed a claim against the above mentioned Resolutions which was resolved in September 2013 through Management Resolution which declared the invalidity of Tax Assessment Resolutions challenged and ordered the conduction of a new tax inspection.
Such tax inspection was carried out during September, October and November 2013, having that in this last month, the Municipality notified the Subsidiary through a Tax Assessment Resolution for which an alleged omitted tax amounting to S/. 4,341 thousand was subject under collection.
In December 2013, the Subsidiary filed a claim against the new Tax Assessment Resolution which was resolved in that same month through Management Resolution. This last Resolution declared groundless the claim. The Subsidiary filed an appeal against Major Resolution under the legal established term.
The contingency updated as of December 31, 2013 amounts to S/. 7, 650 thousand.
In opinion of the Subsidiaries management and its legal advisors there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(l) Real Estate Transfer Tax Assessment of year 2009 imposed by the District Municipality of Masma:
In July 2013, the District Municipality of Masma notified Chinango S.A.C through Tax Assessment Resolutions for which an amount of alleged debt of real estate transfer tax was subject to collection. It taxed the transfer of certain assets in the simple reorganization carried out between Edegel S.A.A. and Chinango S.A.C. in May 2009.
In August 2013, the Subsidiary filed an appeal against the mentioned Tax Assessment Resolution.
In December 2013, the Subsidiary was notified with Official Letter issued by the Municipality through which such entity informs the Subsidiary that will declare inadmissible the above mentioned appeal if no payment of tax debt is accepted in the Municipal savings bank since the payment on consignment (in The judiciary) is not valid. The Subsidiary will respond such Official Letter.
The contingency updated as of December 31, 2013 amounts to S/. 2,667 thousand.
In opinion of the Subsidiaries management and its legal advisors there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
(m) Property Tax Assessment of year 2010 imposed by the District Municipality of San Ramon:
In December 2013, the District Municipality of San Ramon notified Chinango S.A.C. through a Tax Assessment Resolution for which the amount of S/. 229 thousand for an alleged omission in the payment of the Property Tax of year 2010 was subject to collection.
The Subsidiary filed an appeal against the Tax Assessment Resolution within the legal established term.
The contingency updated as of December 31, 2013 amounts to S/. 341 thousand.
In opinion of the Subsidiarys management and its legal advisors there are reasonable arguments to obtain a favorable result.
F-267
GENERANDES PERÚ S.A. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
(35) Subsequent Events
After December 31, 2013, the following events occurred:
On April 15, 2014, the Company received from the insurance company MAPFRE, the amount of US$ 13 million for the claim of the TG7 occurred in May 2013.
On April 29, 2014, Enersis S.A. entered into a purchase agreement for the acquisition of all the shares that Inkia Americas Holdings Limited indirectly holds in Generandes Perú S.A. (equivalent to 39.01% of such company), controlling entity of Edegel S.A.A. The above mentioned purchase agreement includes the price of US$ 413 million payable once the shares are transferred.
F-268
Until , 2015 (the 25th day after the date of this prospectus), all dealers that buy, sell or trade in our ordinary shares, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriter and with respect to their unsold allotment or subscription.
Ordinary Shares
PROSPECTUS
BofA Merrill Lynch | Credit Suisse |
Goldman, Sachs & Co. | UBS Investment Bank |
HSBC | Scotiabank | Credicorp Capital |
The date of this prospectus is , 2015.
PART II
INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS
Item 6. Indemnification of Directors and Officers
Our memorandum and articles of association provide that, subject to the provisions of the Singapore Companies Act, every director, secretary or other officer of our Company or our subsidiaries and affiliates shall be entitled to be indemnified by our Company against all costs, charges, losses, expenses and liabilities incurred by him in the execution and discharge of his duties (and where he serves at our request as a director, officer, employee or agent of any of our subsidiaries or affiliates) or in relation thereto and in particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, no director, secretary or other officer of our Company shall be liable for the acts, receipts, neglects or defaults of any other director or officer or for joining in any receipt or other act for conformity or for any loss or expense happening to our Company through the insufficiency or deficiency of title to any property acquired by order of the directors for or on behalf of our Company or for the insufficiency or deficiency of any security in or upon which any of the moneys of our Company shall be invested or for any loss or damage arising from the bankruptcy, insolvency or tortious act of any person with whom any moneys, securities or effects shall be deposited or left or for any other loss, damage or misfortune whatever which shall happen in the execution of the duties of his office or in relation thereto unless the same shall happen through his own negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust.
Section 172 of the Singapore Companies Act prohibits a company from indemnifying its directors or officers against liability, which by law would otherwise attach to them for any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which they may be guilty relating to the company. However, a company is not prohibited from (a) purchasing and maintaining for any such officer insurance against any such liability, or (b) indemnifying such officer against any liability incurred by him in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal, in which judgment is given in his favor or in which he is acquitted, or in connection with any application under Section 76A(13) or 391 or any other provision of the Singapore Companies Act in which relief is granted to him by the court.
When the Second Phase of the Amendment Act becomes effective, we will be allowed to indemnify our officer against liability incurred by the officer to a person other than the company, except when the indemnity is (i) against any liability of the officer to pay a fine in criminal proceedings, (ii) a penalty in respect of non-compliance with any regulatory requirements, (iii) any liability incurred by the officer in defending criminal proceedings in which the officer is convicted, (iv) in civil proceedings brought by the company or a related company in which judgment is given against the officer, or (v) in connection with an application for a relief from liability in which the court refuses to grant the officer relief. We will also be allowed to provide funds to our director to meet expenditure incurred or to be incurred by him or her, or to enable him or her to avoid incurring expenditure in defending himself or herself in connection with any alleged negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust by him or her in relation to the company: (i) in any criminal or civil proceedings, (ii) in any investigation by a regulatory authority, (iii) against any action proposed to be taken by a regulatory authority, or (iv) in connection with an application for relief .
We will enter into indemnification agreements with our officers and directors. These indemnification agreements provide our officers and directors with indemnification to the maximum extent permitted by the Singapore Companies Act. We have also obtained a policy of directors and officers liability insurance that will insure directors and officers against the cost of defense, settlement or payment of a judgment under certain circumstances which are permitted under the Singapore Companies Act.
Item 7. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
On May 4, 2015, one ordinary share, representing our outstanding share capital, was issued to our sole shareholder, Kenon, in connection with our formation and in reliance upon the exclusion from registration provided by Regulation S under the Securities Act.
Prior to the completion of the offering, our sole shareholder, Kenon, will effect a Reorganization pursuant to which it will transfer all of its equity interests in its wholly-owned subsidiary ICP to us, in exchange for (i) receipt of of our ordinary shares issued for such purpose, and (ii) receipt of a note payable by us to Kenon in an aggregate principal amount of $220 million. The issuance and transfer of our ordinary shares to Kenon in connection with the Reorganization will be made in reliance upon the exclusion from registration provided by Regulation S under the Securities Act.
Item 8. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Exhibits.
Incorporated by reference to the Exhibit Index following page II-3 hereof.
(b) Financial Statement Schedules.
Pursuant to Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X, we have furnished affiliate financial statements of Generandes Perú S.A. beginning on page F-120.
Item 9. Undertakings
The undersigned hereby undertakes:
(a) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to provide to the underwriters at the closing specified in the underwriting agreement certificates in such denominations and registered in such names as required by the underwriters to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.
(b) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the provisions referenced in this registration statement, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer, or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered hereunder, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question of whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.
(c) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that:
(1) For purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective.
(2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.
2
(3) For the purpose of determining liability of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 to any purchaser in the initial distribution of the securities:
The undersigned registrant undertakes that in a primary offering of securities of the undersigned registrant pursuant to this registration statement, regardless of the underwriting method used to sell the securities to the purchaser, if the securities are offered or sold to such purchaser by means of any of the following communications, the undersigned registrant will be a seller to the purchaser and will be considered to offer or sell such securities to such purchaser:
(i) Any preliminary prospectus or prospectus of the undersigned registrant relating to the offering required to be filed pursuant to Rule 424;
(ii) Any free writing prospectus relating to the offering prepared by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant or used or referred to by the undersigned registrant;
(iii) The portion of any other free writing prospectus relating to the offering containing material information about the undersigned registrant or its securities provided by or on behalf of the undersigned registrant; and
(iv) Any other communication that is an offer in the offering made by the undersigned registrant to the purchaser.
3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form F-1 and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in Lima, Peru on November 2, 2015.
IC Power Pte. Ltd. | ||||
By: | /s/ Javier García-Burgos | |||
Name: | Javier García-Burgos | |||
Title: | Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Dated November 2, 2015 | By: |
/s/ Javier García-Burgos |
||||
Name: | Javier García-Burgos | |||||
Title: | Chief Executive Officer | |||||
Dated November 2, 2015 | By: |
/s/ * |
||||
Name: | Alberto Triulzi | |||||
Title: | Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer | |||||
Dated November 2, 2015 | By: |
/s/ * |
||||
Name: | Laurence N. Charney | |||||
Title: | Director | |||||
Dated November 2, 2015 | By: |
/s/ * |
||||
Name: | Yoav Doppelt | |||||
Title: | Director | |||||
Dated November 2, 2015 | By: |
/s/ * |
||||
Name: | Cyril Pierre-Jean Ducau | |||||
Title: | Director | |||||
Dated November 2, 2015 | By: |
/s/ * |
||||
Name: | Tzahi Goshen | |||||
Title: | Director | |||||
Dated November 2, 2015 | By: |
/s/ * |
||||
Name: |
Aviad Kaufman |
|||||
Title: | Director |
*By: | /s/ Javier García-Burgos | |
Javier García-Burgos | ||
Attorney-in-fact |
Authorized Representative in the United States |
||||
By: |
/s/ Donald J. Puglisi |
|||
Name: | Donald J. Puglisi | |||
Title: | Managing Director, Puglisi & Associates | |||
Dated: | November 2, 2015 |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
|
Description of Document |
|
1.1* |
Form of Underwriting Agreement | |
3.1 |
Form of Memorandum and Articles of Association | |
4.1* |
Form of Specimen Share Certificate | |
4.2 |
Form of Registration Rights Agreement | |
5.1 |
Form of Opinion of Wong Partnership LLP, Singapore counsel of IC Power Pte. Ltd., as to the legality of the ordinary shares | |
10.1** |
Indenture, dated as of April 4, 2011, between Inkia Energy Limited, as issuer, and Citibank, N.A. as trustee, relating to Inkia Energy Limiteds 8.375% Senior Notes due 2021 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Kenon Holding Ltd.s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on March 31, 2015) | |
10.2** |
Facility Agreement, dated as of January 2, 2011, among O.P.C. Rotem Ltd., as borrower, Bank Leumi Le-Israel B.M., as arranger and agent, Bank Leumi Le-Israel Trust Company Ltd., as security trustee, and the senior lenders named therein (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.10 to Kenon Holding Ltd.s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on March 31, 2015) | |
10.3** |
Credit Agreement, dated as of August 17, 2012, among Cerro del Águila S.A., as borrower, Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, as administrative agent, and other parties party thereto (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.11 to Kenon Holding Ltd.s Annual Report on Form 20-F, filed on March 31, 2015) | |
10.4** |
English translation of Natural Gas Supply Agreement, dated as of January 2, 2006, as amended, among Kallpa Generación S.A., Pluspetrol Peru Corporation S.A., Pluspetrol Camisea S.A., Hunt Oil Company of Peru L.L.C. Sucursal del Peru, SK Corporation Sucursal Peruana, Sonatrach Peru Corporation S.A.C., Tecpetrol del Peru S.A.C. and Repsol Exploración Peru Sucursal del Peru (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Amendment No. 1 to Kenon Holdings Ltd.s Draft Registration Statement on Form 20-F, filed on August 14, 2014) | |
10.5** |
English translation of Natural Gas Transportation Agreement, dated as of December 10, 2007, as amended, between Kallpa Generación S.A. and Transportadora de Gas del Peru S.A. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Amendment No. 1 to Kenon Holdings Ltd.s Draft Registration Statement on Form 20-F, filed on August 14, 2014) | |
10.6** |
Turnkey Engineering, Procurement and Construction Contract, dated as of November 4, 2011, among Cerro del Águila S.A., Astaldi S.p.A. and GyM S.A (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Amendment No. 1 to Kenon Holdings Ltd.s Draft Registration Statement on Form 20-F, filed on August 14, 2014) | |
10.7** |
English translation of Contract of Concession, dated as of October 23, 2010, as amended, between the Government of Peru and Kallpa Generación S.A., relating to the provision of electric energy services to the public (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Amendment No. 1 to Kenon Holdings Ltd.s Draft Registration Statement on Form 20-F, filed on August 14, 2014) | |
10.8 |
Gas Sale and Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 25, 2012, among Noble Energy Mediterranean Ltd., Delek Drilling Limited Partnership, Isramco Negev 2 Limited Partnership, Avner Oil Exploration Limited Partnership, Dor Gas Exploration Limited Partnership, and O.P.C. Rotem Ltd. |
Exhibit
|
Description of Document |
|
21.1** |
List of significant subsidiaries of IC Power Pte. Ltd. | |
23.1 |
Consent of Somekh Chaikin, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | |
23.2 |
Consent of Caipo y Asociados S. Civil de R.L., Independent Auditors | |
23.3* |
Consent of Wong Partnership LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1) | |
24.1** |
Powers of Attorney (included on the signature page in Part II of this registration statement) |
* | To be filed by amendment. |
** | Previously filed. |
| Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 406 under the Securities Act. Omitted information has been filed separately with the SEC. |
Exhibit 3.1
THE COMPANIES ACT, CAP. 50
PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARES
NEW
ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
(Adopted by Special Resolution passed on )
of
[ ]
PRELIMINARY
1. The regulations contained in Table A in the Fourth Schedule to the Act shall not apply to the Company, but the following shall, subject to repeal, addition and alteration as provided by the Act or these Articles, be the regulations of the Company. |
Table A not to apply. |
|
2. In these Articles, if not inconsistent with the subject or context, the words standing in the first column of the Table next hereinafter contained shall bear the meanings set opposite to them respectively in the second column thereof: |
Interpretation. |
WORDS | MEANINGS | |||||
the Act | .. | The Companies Act, Cap. 50 or any statutory modification, amendment or re-enactment thereof for the time being in force or any and every other act for the time being in force concerning companies and affecting the Company and any reference to any provision of the Act is to that provision as so modified, amended or re-enacted or contained in any such subsequent Companies Act. |
Affiliate | .. | An affiliate of, or a person affiliated with, a specified person, is a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the person specified, and affiliates shall be construed accordingly. | ||||
these Articles |
.. | These Articles of Association or other regulations of the Company for the time being in force. | ||||
the Company | .. | The above named Company by whatever name from time to time called. | ||||
Auditors | .. | The auditors for the time being of the Company. | ||||
Depository | .. | The Depository Trust Company or its nominee (as the case may be) or such other depository or its nominee (as the case may be) as may be designated and approved by the Directors from time to time. | ||||
Director | .. | Includes any person acting as a Director of the Company and includes any person duly appointed and acting for the time being as an Alternate Director. | ||||
Directors | .. | The Directors for the time being of the Company or such number of them as having authority to act for the Company. | ||||
dividend | .. | Includes bonus. | ||||
Member | .. | A Member of the Company, except that, where the Act requires, excludes the Company where it is a member by reason of its holding of its shares as treasury shares. | ||||
month | .. | Calendar month. | ||||
Office | .. | The Registered Office of the Company for the time being. | ||||
paid up | .. | Includes credited as paid up. | ||||
Register | .. | The Register of Members. | ||||
Seal | .. | The Common Seal of the Company or in appropriate cases the Official Seal or duplicate Common Seal. | ||||
Secretary | .. | The Secretary or Secretaries appointed under these Articles and shall include any person entitled to perform the duties of Secretary temporarily. | ||||
Singapore | .. | The Republic of Singapore. |
2
BUSINESS | ||
3. Subject to the provisions of the Act, any branch or kind of business which the Company is expressly or by implication empowered to undertake may be undertaken by the Directors at such time or times as they shall think fit, and further may be suffered by them to be in abeyance, whether such branch or kind of business may have been actually commenced or not, so long as the Directors may deem it expedient not to commence or proceed with such branch or kind of business. |
Any branch or kind of business either expressly or by implication empowered to be undertaken may be undertaken by Directors. |
3
4
9. If at any time the share capital is divided into different classes, the rights attached to any class (unless otherwise provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class) may, subject to the provisions of the Act, whether or not the Company is being wound up, be varied or abrogated with the consent in writing of the holders of at least three-fourths of the issued shares of that class or with the sanction of a Special Resolution passed at a separate General Meeting of the holders of shares of that class and to every such Special Resolution the provisions of Section 184 of the Act shall with such adaptations as are necessary apply. To every such separate General Meeting the provisions of these Articles relating to General Meetings shall mutatis mutandis apply. Provided Always That: |
Variation of rights. | |||||
(a) | the necessary quorum shall be two persons at least holding or representing by proxy or by attorney no less than one-third of the issued shares of the class and that any holder of shares of the class present in person or by proxy or by attorney may demand a poll; or | |||||
(b) | where all the issued shares of the class are held by one person, the necessary quorum shall be one person and such holder of shares of the class present in person or by proxy or by attorney may demand a poll. | |||||
10. The rights conferred upon the holders of the shares of any class issued with preferred or other rights shall, unless otherwise expressly provided by the terms of issue of the shares of that class or by these Articles as are in force at the time of such issue, be deemed to be varied by the creation or issue of further shares ranking equally therewith. |
Creation or issue of further shares with special rights. |
|||||
11. The Company may pay commissions or brokerage on any issue of shares at such rate or amount and in such manner as the Directors may deem fit. Such commission or brokerage may be satisfied by the payment of cash or the allotment of fully or partly paid shares or by a combination of cash and fully or partly paid shares. |
Power to pay commission and brokerage. |
|||||
12. If any shares of the Company are issued for the purpose of raising money to defray the expenses of the construction of any works or the provisions of any plant which cannot be made profitable for a long period, the Company may, subject to the conditions and restrictions mentioned in the Act pay interest on such of the shares (excluding treasury shares) as is for the time being paid up and may charge the same to capital as part of the cost of the construction or provision. |
Power to charge interest on capital. |
|||||
13. Except as required by law, no person shall be recognised by the Company as holding any share upon any trust and the Company shall not be bound by or compelled in any way to recognise (even when having notice thereof) any equitable, contingent, future or partial interest in any share or any interest in any fractional part of a share or (except only as by these Articles or by law otherwise provided) any other rights in respect of any share, except an absolute right to the entirety thereof in the registered holder. |
Exclusion of equities. |
5
14. If two or more persons are registered as joint holders of any share, any one of such persons may give effectual receipts for any dividend payable in respect of such share and the joint holders of a share shall, subject to the provisions of the Act, be severally as well as jointly liable for the payment of all instalments and calls and interest due in respect of such shares. Such joint holders shall be deemed to be one Member and the delivery of a certificate for a share to one of several joint holders shall be sufficient delivery to all such holders. |
Joint holders. | |
15. No person shall be recognised by the Company as having title to a fractional part of a share or otherwise than as the sole or a joint holder of the entirety of such share. |
Fractional part of a share. |
|
16. If by the conditions of allotment of any shares the whole or any part of the amount of the issue price thereof shall be payable by instalments, every such instalment shall, when due, be paid to the Company by the person who for the time being shall be the registered holder of the share or his personal representatives, but this provision shall not affect the liability of any allottee who may have agreed to pay the same. |
Payment of instalments. |
|
17. The certificate of title to shares in the capital of the Company shall be issued under the Seal in such form as the Directors shall from time to time prescribe and shall bear the autographic or facsimile signatures of at least one Director and the Secretary or a second Director or some other person appointed by the Directors, and shall specify the number and class of shares to which it relates and the amount paid and amount (if any) unpaid thereon. The facsimile signatures may be reproduced by mechanical, electronic or other means provided the method or system of reproducing signatures has first been approved by the Directors. |
Share certificates. |
|
18. Every person whose name is entered as a Member in the Register shall be entitled within two months after allotment or within one month after the lodgment of any transfer to one certificate for all his shares of any one class or to several certificates in reasonable denominations each for a part of the shares so allotted or transferred. Where a Member transfers part only of the shares comprised in a certificate or where a Member requires the Company to cancel any certificate or certificates and issue new certificates for the purpose of subdividing his holding in a different manner the old certificate or certificates shall be cancelled and a new certificate or certificates for the balance of such shares issued in lieu thereof and the Member shall pay a fee not exceeding S$2/- for each such new certificate as the Directors may determine. |
Entitlement to certificate. |
|
19. If any certificate or other document of title to shares or debentures be worn out or defaced, then upon production thereof to the Directors, they may order the same to be cancelled and may issue a new certificate in lieu thereof. For every certificate so issued there shall be paid to the Company a fee not exceeding S$2/- as the Directors may determine. Subject to the provisions of the Act and the requirements of the Directors thereunder, if any certificate or |
New certificates may be issued. |
6
7
8
30. There shall be paid to the Company in respect of the registration of any probate, letters of administration, certificate of marriage or death, power of attorney or other document relating to or affecting the title to any shares, such fee not exceeding S$2/- as the Directors may from time to time require or prescribe. |
Fee for registration of probate etc. | |||||||
CALLS ON SHARES
|
||||||||
31. The Directors may from time to time make such calls as they think fit upon the Members in respect of any moneys unpaid on their shares and not by the terms of the issue thereof made payable at fixed times, and each Member shall (subject to receiving at least fourteen days notice specifying the time or times and place of payment) pay to the Company at the time or times and place so specified the amount called on his shares. A call may be revoked or postponed as the Directors may determine. |
Calls on shares. | |||||||
32. A call shall be deemed to have been made at the time when the resolution of the Directors authorising the call was passed and may be made payable by instalments. |
Time when made. | |||||||
33. If a sum called in respect of a share is not paid before or on the day appointed for payment thereof, the person from whom the sum is due shall pay interest on the sum due from the day appointed for payment thereof to the time of actual payment at such rate not exceeding ten per cent per annum as the Directors determine, but the Directors shall be at liberty to waive payment of such interest wholly or in part. |
Interest on calls. | |||||||
34. Any sum which by the terms of issue of a share becomes payable upon allotment or at any fixed date, shall for all purposes of these Articles be deemed to be a call duly made and payable on the date, on which, by the terms of issue, the same becomes payable, and in case of non-payment all the relevant provisions of these Articles as to payment of interest and expenses, forfeiture or otherwise shall apply as if such sum had become payable by virtue of a call duly made and notified. |
Sum due on allotment. |
|||||||
35. The Directors may on the issue of shares differentiate between the holders as to the amount of calls to be paid and the times of payments. |
Power to differentiate. |
|||||||
36. The Directors may, if they think fit, receive from any Member willing to advance the same all or any part of the moneys uncalled and unpaid upon the shares held by him and such payments in advance of calls shall extinguish, so far as the same shall extend, the liability upon the shares in respect of which they are made, and upon the moneys so received or so much thereof as from time to time exceeds the amount of the calls then made upon the shares concerned the Company may pay interest at such rate not exceeding eight per cent per annum as the Member paying such sum and the Directors agree upon. |
Payment in advance of calls. |
9
FORFEITURE AND LIEN | ||
37. If any Member fails to pay in full any call or instalment of a call on the day appointed for payment thereof, the Directors may at any time thereafter serve a notice on such Member requiring payment of so much of the call or instalment as is unpaid together with any interest and expenses which may have accrued. |
Notice requiring payment of calls. |
|
38. The notice shall name a further day (not being less than fourteen days from the date of service of the notice) on or before which and the place where the payment required by the notice is to be made, and shall state that in the event of non-payment in accordance therewith the shares on which the call was made will be liable to be forfeited. |
Notice to state time and place. |
|
39. If the requirements of any such notice as aforesaid are not complied with, any share in respect of which such notice has been given may at any time thereafter, before payment of all calls and interest and expenses due in respect thereof be forfeited by a resolution of the Directors to that effect. Such forfeiture shall include all dividends declared in respect of the forfeited share and not actually paid before the forfeiture. The Directors may accept a surrender of any share liable to be forfeited hereunder. |
Forfeiture on non-compliance with notice. | |
40. A share so forfeited or surrendered shall become the property of the Company and may be sold, re-allotted or otherwise disposed of either to the person who was before such forfeiture or surrender the holder thereof or entitled thereto, or to any other person, upon such terms and in such manner as the Directors shall think fit, and at any time before a sale, re-allotment or disposition the forfeiture or surrender may be cancelled on such terms as the Directors think fit. To give effect to any such sale, the Directors may, if necessary, authorise some person to transfer a forfeited or surrendered share to any such person as aforesaid. |
Sale of shares forfeited. |
|
41. A Member whose shares have been forfeited or surrendered shall cease to be a Member in respect of the shares, but shall notwithstanding the forfeiture or surrender remain liable to pay to the Company all moneys which at the date of forfeiture or surrender were payable by him to the Company in respect of the shares with interest thereon at eight per cent per annum (or such lower rate as the Directors may approve) from the date of forfeiture or surrender until payment, but such liability shall cease if and when the Company receives payment in full of all such moneys in respect of the shares and the Directors may waive payment of such interest either wholly or in part. |
Rights and liabilities of Members whose shares have been forfeited or surrendered. |
|
42. The Company shall have a first and paramount lien and charge on every share (not being a fully paid share) registered in the name of each Member (whether solely or jointly with others) and on the dividends declared or payable in respect thereof for all calls and instalments due on any such share and interest and expenses thereon but such lien shall only be upon the specific shares in respect of which such calls or instalments are due and unpaid and on all dividends from time to time declared in respect of the shares. The Directors may resolve that any share shall for some specified period be exempt from the provisions of this Article. |
Companys lien. |
10
43. The Company may sell in such manner as the Directors think fit any share on which the Company has a lien, but no sale shall be made unless some sum in respect of which the lien exists is presently payable nor until the expiration of fourteen days after notice in writing stating and demanding payment of the sum payable and giving notice of intention to sell in default, shall have been given to the registered holder for the time being of the share or the person entitled thereto by reason of his death or bankruptcy. To give effect to any such sale, the Directors may authorise some person to transfer the shares sold to the purchaser thereof. |
Sale of shares subject to lien. |
|||||
44. The proceeds of the sale shall be received by the Company and applied in payment of such part of the amount in respect of which the lien exists as is presently payable and the residue, if any, shall be paid to the person entitled to the shares at the date of the sale. |
Application of proceeds of such sales. |
|||||
45. A statutory declaration in writing that the declarant is a Director of the Company and that a share has been duly forfeited or surrendered or sold to satisfy a lien of the Company on a date stated in the declaration shall be conclusive evidence of the facts stated therein as against all persons claiming to be entitled to the share, and such declaration and the receipt of the Company for the consideration (if any) given for the share on the sale, re-allotment or disposal thereof together with the certificate of proprietorship of the share under Seal delivered to a purchaser or allottee thereof shall (subject to the execution of a transfer if the same be required) constitute a good title to the share and the person to whom the share is sold, re-allotted or disposed of shall be registered as the holder of the share and shall not be bound to see to the application of the purchase money (if any) nor shall his title to the share be affected by any irregularity or invalidity in the proceedings in reference to the forfeiture, surrender, sale, re-allotment or disposal of the share. |
Title to shares forfeited or surrendered or sold to satisfy a lien. | |||||
ALTERATION OF CAPITAL |
||||||
46. Subject to any special rights for the time being attached to any existing class of shares, any new shares in the Company shall be issued upon such terms and conditions and with such rights and privileges annexed thereto as the General Meeting resolving upon the creation thereof shall direct and if no direction be given as the Directors shall determine subject to the provisions of these Articles and in particular (but without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing) such shares may be issued with a preferential or qualified right to dividends and in the distribution of assets of the Company or otherwise. |
Rights and privileges of new shares. |
|||||
47. Except so far as otherwise provided by the conditions of issue or by these Articles all new shares shall be subject to the provisions of these Articles with reference to allotments, payment of calls, liens, transfers, transmissions, forfeiture and otherwise. |
New shares otherwise subject to provisions of Articles. | |||||
48. The Company may by Ordinary Resolution: |
Power to consolidate, subdivide and convert shares. | |||||
(a) | consolidate and divide all or any of its shares; |
11
12
13
14
15
the minute book shall be conclusive evidence of the fact without proof of the number or proportion of the votes recorded in favour for or against the resolution. A demand for a poll may be withdrawn.
|
||||||||
64. If a poll be duly demanded (and the demand be not withdrawn) it shall be taken in such manner (including the use of ballot or voting papers) as the Chairman may direct and the result of a poll shall be deemed to be the resolution of the Meeting at which the poll was demanded. The Chairman may, and if so requested shall, appoint scrutineers and may adjourn the Meeting to some place and time fixed by him for the purpose of declaring the result of the poll.
|
Taking a poll. | |||||||
65. If any votes be counted which ought not to have been counted or might have been rejected, the error shall not vitiate the result of the voting unless it be pointed out at the same Meeting or at any adjournment thereof and not in any case unless it shall in the opinion of the Chairman be of sufficient magnitude.
|
Votes counted in error. | |||||||
66. In the case of equality of votes, whether on a show of hands or on a poll, the Chairman of the Meeting at which the show of hands takes place or at which the poll is demanded shall not be entitled to a second or casting vote.
|
Chairman no casting vote. | |||||||
67. A poll demanded on any question shall be taken either immediately or at such subsequent time (not being more than thirty days from the date of the Meeting) and place as the Chairman may direct. No notice need be given of a poll not taken immediately.
|
Time for taking a poll. | |||||||
68. The demand for a poll shall not prevent the continuance of a Meeting for the transaction of any business, other than the question on which the poll has been demanded. |
Continuance of business after demand for a poll. |
|||||||
VOTES OF MEMBERS
|
||||||||
69. Subject to these Articles and to any special rights or restrictions as to voting attached to any class of shares hereinafter issued on a show of hands every Member entitled to vote who is present in person or by proxy or attorney or in the case of a corporation by a representative shall have one vote and on a poll every such Member shall have one vote for every share of which he is the holder or represents.
|
Voting rights of Members. |
|||||||
70. Where there are joint registered holders of any share any one of such persons may vote and be reckoned in a quorum at any Meeting either personally or by proxy or by attorney or in the case of a corporation by a representative as if he were solely entitled thereto and if more than one of such joint holders be so present at any Meeting that one of such persons so present whose name stands first in the Register in respect of such share shall alone be entitled to vote in respect thereof. Several executors or administrators of a deceased Member in whose name any share stands shall for the purpose of this Article be deemed joint holders thereof. |
Voting rights of joint holders. |
16
71. A Member of unsound mind or whose person or estate is liable to be dealt with in any way under the law relating to mental disorders may vote whether on a show of hands or on a poll by his committee, curator bonis or such other person as properly has the management of his estate and any such committee, curator bonis or other person may vote by proxy or attorney. Provided that such evidence as the Directors may require of the authority of the person claiming to vote shall have been deposited at the Office not less than forty-eight hours before the time appointed for holding the Meeting.
|
Voting rights of Members of unsound mind. | |||||||
72. Subject to the provisions of these Articles and the Act, every Member shall be entitled to be present and to vote at any General Meeting either personally or by proxy or by attorney or in the case of a corporation by a representative and to be reckoned in a quorum in respect of shares fully paid and in respect of partly paid shares where calls are not due and unpaid.
|
Right to vote | |||||||
73. No objection shall be raised to the qualification of any voter except at the Meeting or adjourned Meeting at which the vote objected to is given or tendered and every vote not disallowed at such Meeting shall be valid for all purposes. Any such objection made in due time shall be referred to the Chairman of the Meeting whose decision shall be final and conclusive.
|
Objections. | |||||||
74. On a poll, votes may be given either personally or by proxy or by attorney or in the case of a corporation by its representative and a person entitled to more than one vote need not use all his votes or cast all the votes he uses in the same way.
|
Votes on a poll. | |||||||
75. (a) A Member may appoint one or more proxies to attend and vote at the same General Meeting.
|
Appointment of proxies. |
|||||||
(b) In any case where a form of proxy appoints more than one proxy, the proportion of the shareholding concerned to be represented by each proxy shall be specified in the form of proxy.
|
||||||||
76. An instrument appointing a proxy shall be in writing and: |
Proxy instrument to be in writing. | |||||||
(a) |
in the case of an individual shall be signed by the appointor or by his attorney; and
|
|||||||
(b) |
in the case of a corporation shall be either (i) under the common seal or company stamp of such corporation or such other equivalent form authorised under the laws of incorporation of such corporation; or (ii) signed by its attorney or by an officer on behalf of such corporation (and facsimile signatures of the attorney or an officer of such corporation will suffice for this purpose).
|
|||||||
The Directors may, but shall not be bound to, require evidence of the authority of any such attorney or officer.
|
||||||||
77. A proxy need not be a Member. |
Proxy need not be a Member. |
17
78. An instrument appointing a proxy or the power of attorney or other authority, if any, must be left at the Office or such other place (if any) as is specified for the purpose in the notice convening the Meeting not less than forty-eight hours before the time appointed for the holding of the Meeting or adjourned Meeting (or in the case of a poll before the time appointed for the taking of the poll) at which it is to be used and in default shall not be treated as valid unless the Directors otherwise determine.
|
Deposit of proxies. | |||||||
79. An instrument appointing a proxy shall be in the following form with such variations if any as circumstances may require or in such other form as the Directors may accept and shall be deemed to include the right to demand or join in demanding a poll, to move any resolution or amendment thereto and to speak at the meeting: |
Form of proxies. | |||||||
[ ]
|
||||||||
I/We, of a Member/Members of the above named Company hereby appoint of or whom failing of to vote for me/us and on my/our behalf at the (Annual, Extraordinary or Adjourned, as the case may be) General Meeting of the Company to be held on the day of and at every adjournment thereof. As Witness my/our hand this day of .
|
||||||||
An instrument appointing a proxy shall, unless the contrary is stated thereon, be valid as well for any adjournment of the Meeting as for the Meeting to which it relates and need not be witnessed.
|
||||||||
80. A vote given in accordance with the terms of an instrument of proxy (which for the purposes of these Articles shall also include a power of attorney) shall be valid notwithstanding the previous death or insanity of the principal or revocation of the proxy, or of the authority under which the proxy was executed or the transfer of the share in respect of which the proxy was given. Provided that no intimation in writing of such death, insanity, revocation or transfer shall have been received by the Company at the Office (or such other place as may be specified for the deposit of instruments appointing proxies) before the commencement of the Meeting or adjourned Meeting (or in the case of a poll before the time appointed for the taking of the poll) at which the proxy is used.
|
Intervening death or insanity of principal not to revoke proxy. |
|||||||
81. Any corporation which is a Member may by resolution of its directors or other governing body authorise such person as it thinks fit to act as its representative at any Meeting of the Company or of any class of Members. The person so authorised shall be entitled to exercise the same powers on behalf of the corporation as the corporation could exercise if it were an individual |
Corporations acting by representatives. |
18
19
(B) Every Director shall observe the provisions of Section 156 of the Act relating to the disclosure of the interests of the Directors in transactions or proposed transactions with the Company or of any office or property held by a Director which might create duties or interests in conflict with his duties or interests as a Director. Subject to such disclosure, a Director shall be entitled to vote in respect of any transaction or arrangement in which he is interested and he shall be taken into account in ascertaining whether a quorum is present. |
Directors to observe Section 156 of the Act. | |
88. (A) A Director may be or become a director of or hold any office or place of profit (other than as Auditor) or be otherwise interested in any company in which the Company may be interested as vendor, purchaser, shareholder or otherwise and unless otherwise agreed shall not be accountable for any fees, remuneration or other benefits received by him as a director or officer of or by virtue of his interest in such other company. |
Holding of office in other companies. | |
(B) The Directors may exercise the voting power conferred by the shares in any company held or owned by the Company in such manner and in all respects as the Directors think fit in the interests of the Company (including the exercise thereof in favour of any resolution appointing the Directors or any of them to be directors of such company or voting or providing for the payment of remuneration to the directors of such company) and any such Director may vote in favour of the exercise of such voting powers in the manner aforesaid notwithstanding that he may be or be about to be appointed a director of such other company. |
Directors may exercise voting power conferred by Companys shares in another company. | |
MANAGING DIRECTORS |
||
89. The Directors may from time to time appoint one or more of their body to be Managing Director or Managing Directors of the Company and may from time to time (subject to the provisions of any contract between him or them and the Company) remove or dismiss him or them from office and appoint another or others in his or their places. |
Appointment of Managing Directors. |
|
90. A Managing Director shall, subject to the provisions of any contract between him and the Company, be subject to the same provisions as to resignation and removal as the other Directors of the Company and if he ceases to hold the office of Director for any cause he shall ipso facto and immediately cease to be a Managing Director. |
Resignation and removal of Managing Director. |
|
91. Subject to Section 169 of the Act, the remuneration of a Managing Director shall from time to time be fixed by the Directors and may, subject to these Articles, be by way of salary or commission or participation in profits or by any or all of these modes. |
Remuneration of Managing Director. |
|
92. The Directors may from time to time entrust to and confer upon a Managing Director for the time being such of the powers exercisable under these Articles by the Directors as they may think fit and may confer such powers for such time and to be exercised on such terms and conditions and with such |
Power of Managing Director. |
20
21
22
without prejudice to any claim he may have for damages for breach of any such agreement) and appoint another person in place of a Director so removed from office. In default of such appointment, the vacancy arising upon the removal of a Director from office may be filled as a casual vacancy. | ||
99. The Company may by Ordinary Resolution appoint any person to be a Director and the Directors shall have power at any time and from time to time to appoint any person to be a Director either to fill a casual vacancy or as an additional Director. |
Power to fill casual vacancies and to appoint additional Director. |
|
ALTERNATE DIRECTORS |
||
100. (A) Any Director may at any time by writing under his hand and deposited at the Office or by telefax sent to the Secretary appoint any person to be his Alternate Director and may in like manner at any time terminate such appointment. Any appointment or removal by telefax shall be confirmed as soon as possible by letter, but may be acted upon by the Company meanwhile. |
Appointment of Alternate Directors. |
|
(B) A Director or any other person may act as an Alternate Director to represent more than one Director and such Alternate Director shall be entitled at Directors meetings to one vote for every Director whom he represents in addition to his own vote if he is a Director. |
||
(C) The appointment of an Alternate Director shall ipso facto determine on the happening of any event which if he were a Director would render his office as a Director to be vacated and his appointment shall also determine ipso facto if his appointor ceases for any reason to be a Director. |
||
(D) An Alternate Director shall be entitled to receive notices of meetings of the Directors and to attend and vote as a Director at any such meeting at which the Director appointing him is not personally present and generally, if his appointor is absent from Singapore or is otherwise unable to act as such Director, to perform all functions of his appointor as a Director (except the power to appoint an Alternate Director) and to sign any resolution in accordance with the provisions of Article 105. |
||
(E) An Alternate Director shall not be taken into account in reckoning the minimum number of Directors allowed for the time being under these Articles but he shall be counted for the purpose of reckoning whether a quorum is present at any meeting of the Directors attended by him at which he is entitled to vote. Provided that in the event the Company has more than one Director, he shall not constitute a quorum under Article 102 if he is the only person present at the meeting notwithstanding that he may be an Alternate to more than one Director. |
||
(F) An Alternate Director may be repaid by the Company such expenses as might properly be repaid to him if he were a Director and he shall be entitled to receive from the Company such proportion (if any) of the remuneration otherwise payable to his appointor as such appointor may by notice in writing to the Company from time to time direct, but save as aforesaid he shall not in respect of such appointment be entitled to receive any remuneration from the Company. |
23
24
(b) | A Director may and the Secretary on the requisition of a Director shall at any time summon a meeting of the Directors. Every such notice shall specify the place, the day and the hour of the meeting and the general nature of the business to be transacted Provided that any Director may waive the requirement for notice or accept shorter notice of any meeting of the Directors. | |||||
103. The continuing Directors may act notwithstanding any vacancies in their body. If and so long as the number of Directors is reduced below the minimum number fixed by or in accordance with these Articles, any Member may summon a General Meeting for the purpose of appointing Directors. |
Proceedings in case of vacancies. | |||||
104. The Directors may from time to time elect a Chairman and if desired a Deputy Chairman and determine the period for which he is or they are to hold office. The Deputy Chairman will perform the duties of the Chairman during the Chairmans absence for any reason. The Chairman and in his absence the Deputy Chairman shall preside as Chairman at meetings of the Directors but if no such Chairman or Deputy Chairman be elected or if at any meeting the Chairman and the Deputy Chairman be not present within five minutes after the time appointed for holding the same, the Directors present shall choose one of their number to be Chairman of such meeting. |
Chairman of Directors. |
|||||
105. A resolution in writing signed by all the Directors for the time being and being not less than are sufficient to form a quorum shall be as effective as a resolution passed at a meeting of the Directors duly convened and held, and may consist of several documents in the like form each signed by one or more of the Directors. Provided that, where a Director has appointed an Alternate Director, the Director or (in lieu of the Director) his Alternate may sign. The expressions in writing and signed include approval by any such Director by telefax or any form of electronic communication approved by the Directors for such purpose from time to time incorporating, if the Directors deem necessary, the use of security and/or identification procedures and devices approved by the Directors. |
Resolutions in writing. |
|||||
106. (A) The Directors may delegate any of their powers to committees consisting of such member or members of their body and (if thought fit) one or more other persons co-opted as hereinafter provided as they think fit. Any committee so formed shall in the exercise of the powers so delegated conform to any regulations that may be imposed on them by the Directors. Any such regulations may provide for or authorise the co-option to the committee of persons other than Directors and for such co-opted members to have voting rights as members of the committee. |
Power to appoint committees. |
|||||
(B) The meetings and proceedings of any such committee consisting of two or more members shall be governed by the provisions of these Articles regulating the meetings and proceedings of the Directors, so far as the same are applicable and are not superseded by any regulations made by the Directors under the last preceding Article. |
Proceedings at committee meetings. |
25
(C) All acts done by any meeting of Directors or of any such committee or by any person acting as Director or as a member of any such committee, shall as regards all persons dealing in good faith with the Company, notwithstanding that there was some defect in the appointment of any such Director or person acting as aforesaid or that they or any of them were or was disqualified or had vacated office or were not entitled to vote be as valid as if every such person had been duly appointed and was qualified and had continued to be a Director or member of the committee and had been entitled to vote. |
Validity of acts of Directors in spite of some formal defect. |
|
GENERAL POWERS OF THE DIRECTORS | ||
107. The business and affairs of the Company shall be managed by or under the direction of the Directors. The Directors may exercise all such powers of the Company as are not by the Statutes or by these Articles required to be exercised by the Company in General Meeting. The Directors shall not carry into effect any proposals for selling or disposing of the whole or substantially the whole of the Companys undertaking or property unless those proposals have been approved by the Company in General Meeting. The general powers given by this Article shall not be limited or restricted by any special authority or power given to the Directors by any other Article. |
General powers of Directors to manage Companys business. |
|
108. (A) The Directors may from time to time by power of attorney under the Seal appoint any company, firm or person or any fluctuating body of persons whether nominated directly or indirectly by the Directors to be the attorney or attorneys of the Company for such purposes and with such powers, authorities and discretions (not exceeding those vested in or exercisable by the Directors under these Articles) and for such period and subject to such conditions as they may think fit, and any such power of attorney may contain such provisions for the protection and convenience of persons dealing with such attorney as the Directors may think fit and may also authorise any such attorney to subdelegate all or any of the powers, authorities and discretions vested in him. |
Power to appoint attorneys. |
|
(B) The Company or the Directors on behalf of the Company may in exercise of the powers in that behalf conferred by the Act cause to be kept a Branch Register or Register of Members and the Directors may (subject to the provisions of the Act) make and vary such regulations as they may think fit in respect of the keeping of any such Branch Register. |
Power to keep Branch Registers. |
|
109. All cheques, promissory notes, drafts, bills of exchange, and other negotiable or transferable instruments and all receipts for moneys paid to the Company shall be signed, drawn, accepted, endorsed or otherwise executed, as the case may be, in such manner as the Directors shall from time to time by resolution determine. |
Signature of cheques and bills. |
|
BORROWING POWERS | ||
110. Subject as hereinafter provided and to the provisions of the Statutes, the Directors may borrow or raise money from time to time for the |
Directors borrowing powers. |
26
27
114. A document purporting to be a copy of a resolution of the Directors or an extract from the minutes of a meeting of the Company or the Directors or any committee which is certified as such in accordance with the provisions of the last preceding Article shall be conclusive evidence in favour of all persons dealing with the Company upon the faith thereof that such resolution has been duly passed or, as the case may be, that such extract is a true and accurate record of a duly constituted meeting. Any authentication or certification made pursuant to this Article may be made by any electronic means approved by the Directors for such purpose from time to time incorporating, if the Directors deem necessary, the use of security and/or identification procedures and devices approved by the Directors. |
Certified copies of resolution of the Directors. |
|||||
DIVIDENDS | ||||||
115. The Company may by Ordinary Resolution declare dividends but (without prejudice to the powers of the Company to pay interest on share capital as hereinbefore provided) no dividend shall be payable except out of the profits of the Company, or in excess of the amount recommended by the Directors. |
Payment of dividends. |
|||||
116. Subject to any rights or restrictions attached to any shares or class of shares and except as otherwise permitted under the Act: |
Apportionment of dividends. |
|||||
(a) | all dividends in respect of shares shall be paid in proportion to the number of shares held by a Member but where shares are partly paid all dividends shall be apportioned and paid proportionately to the amounts paid or credited as paid on the partly paid shares; and | |||||
(b) | all dividends shall be apportioned and paid proportionately to the amounts so paid or credited as paid during any portion or portions of the period in respect of which the dividend is paid, but if any share is issued on terms providing that it shall rank for dividend as from a particular date such share shall rank for dividend accordingly. | |||||
For the purposes of this Article, an amount paid or credited as paid on a share in advance of a call is to be ignored. |
||||||
117. If and so far as in the opinion of the Directors the profits of the Company justify such payments, the Directors may pay the fixed preferential dividends on any class of shares carrying a fixed preferential dividend expressed to be payable on a fixed date on the half-yearly or other dates (if any) prescribed for the payment thereof by the terms of issue of the shares, and subject thereto may also from time to time pay to the holders of any other class of shares interim dividends thereon of such amounts and on such dates as they may think fit. |
Payment of preference and interim dividends. |
|||||
118. No dividend or other moneys payable on or in respect of a share shall bear interest against the Company. |
Dividends not to bear interest. |
28
119. The Directors may deduct from any dividend or other moneys payable to any Member on or in respect of a share all sums of money (if any) presently payable by him to the Company on account of calls or in connection therewith. |
Deduction for debts due to Company. |
|||||
120. The Directors may retain any dividend or other moneys payable on or in respect of a share on which the Company has a lien and may apply the same in or towards satisfaction of the debts, liabilities or engagements in respect of which the lien exists. |
Retention of dividends on shares subject to lien. |
|||||
121. The Directors may retain the dividends payable on shares in respect of which any person is under the provisions as to the transmission of shares hereinbefore contained entitled to become a Member or which any person under those provisions is entitled to transfer until such person shall become a Member in respect of such shares or shall duly transfer the same. |
Retention of dividends on shares pending transmission. |
|||||
122. The payment by the Directors of any unclaimed dividends or other moneys payable on or in respect of a share into a separate account shall not constitute the Company a trustee in respect thereof. All dividends and other moneys payable on or in respect of a share that are unclaimed after first becoming payable may be invested or otherwise made use of by the Directors for the benefit of the Company and any dividend or moneys unclaimed after a period of six years from the date they are first payable may be forfeited and if so shall revert to the Company but the Directors may at any time thereafter at their absolute discretion annul any such forfeiture and pay the moneys so forfeited to the person entitled thereto prior to the forfeiture. |
Unclaimed dividends or other moneys. |
|||||
123. The Company may, upon the recommendation of the Directors, by Ordinary Resolution direct payment of a dividend in whole or in part by the distribution of specific assets and in particular of paid up shares or debentures of any other company or in any one or more of such ways; and the Directors shall give effect to such Resolution and where any difficulty arises in regard to such distribution, the Directors may settle the same as they think expedient and in particular may issue fractional certificates, may fix the value for distribution of such specific assets or any part thereof and may determine that cash payments shall be made to any Members upon the footing of the value so fixed in order to adjust the rights of all parties and may vest any such specific assets in trustees as may seem expedient to the Directors. |
Payment of dividend in specie. |
|||||
124. Any dividend or other moneys payable in cash on or in respect of a share may be paid by cheque or warrant sent through the post to the registered address of the Member or person entitled thereto, or, if several persons are registered as joint holders of the share or are entitled thereto in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of the holder to any one of such persons or to such persons and such address as such persons may by writing direct. Every such cheque or warrant shall be made payable to the order of the person to whom it is sent or to such person as the holder or joint holders or person or persons entitled to the share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of the holder may direct and payment of the cheque if purporting to be endorsed or the receipt of any such person shall be a good discharge to the Company. Every such cheque or warrant shall be sent at the risk of the person entitled to the money represented thereby. |
Dividends payable by cheque. |
29
125. A transfer of shares shall not pass the right to any dividend declared on such shares before the registration of the transfer. |
Effect of transfer. | |||||
RESERVES |
||||||
126. The Directors may from time to time set aside out of the profits of the Company and carry to reserve such sums as they think proper which, at the discretion of the Directors, shall be applicable for meeting contingencies or for the gradual liquidation of any debt or liability of the Company or for repairing or maintaining the works, plant and machinery of the Company or for special dividends or bonuses or for equalising dividends or for any other purpose to which the profits of the Company may properly be applied and pending such application may either be employed in the business of the Company or be invested. |
Power to carry profit to reserve. |
|||||
127. The Directors may divide the reserve into such special funds as they think fit and may consolidate into one fund any special funds or any parts of any special funds into which the reserve may have been divided. The Directors may also without placing the same to reserve carry forward any profits which they may think it not prudent to divide. |
Manner of dealing with reserves. | |||||
BONUS ISSUES AND CAPITALISATION OF PROFITS AND RESERVES |
||||||
128. The Company may, upon the recommendation of the Directors, by Ordinary Resolution: |
Power to issue free bonus shares and/or to capitalise profits. |
|||||
(a) | issue bonus shares for which no consideration is payable to the Company, to the Members holding shares in the Company in proportion to their then holdings of shares; and/or | |||||
(b) | capitalise any sum for the time being standing to the credit of any of the Companys reserve accounts or any sum standing to the credit of the profit and loss account or otherwise available for distribution, provided that such sum be not required for paying the dividends on any shares carrying a fixed cumulative preferential dividend and accordingly that the Directors be authorised and directed to appropriate the sum resolved to be capitalised to the Members holding shares in the Company in the proportions in which such sum would have been divisible amongst them had the same been applied or been applicable in paying dividends and to apply such sum on their behalf either in or towards paying up the amounts (if any) for the time being unpaid on any shares held by such Members respectively, or in paying up in full new shares or debentures of the Company, such shares or debentures to be allotted and |
30
31
131. The Directors shall duly comply with the provisions of the Act and in particular the provisions with regard to registration of charges created by or affecting property of the Company with regard to keeping a Register of Directors and Secretaries, the Register, a Register of Mortgages and Charges and a Register of Directors Share and Debenture Holdings and with regard to the production and furnishing of copies of such Registers and of any Register of Holders of Debentures of the Company. |
Keeping of Registers, etc. | |
132. Any register, index, minute book, book of accounts or other book required by these Articles or by the Act to be kept by or on behalf of the Company may be kept either by making entries in bound books or by recording them in any other manner. In any case in which bound books are not used, the Directors shall take adequate precautions for guarding against falsification and for facilitating discovery. |
Form of registers, etc. | |
ACCOUNTS |
||
133. The Directors shall cause to be kept such accounting and other records as are necessary to comply with the provisions of the Act and shall cause those records to be kept in such manner as to enable them to be conveniently and properly audited. |
Directors to keep proper accounts. |
|
134. Subject to the provisions of Section 199 of the Act, the books of accounts shall be kept at the Office or at such other place or places as the Directors think fit within Singapore. No Member (other than a Director) shall have any right of inspecting any account or book or document or other recording of the Company except as is conferred by law or authorised by the Directors or by an Ordinary Resolution of the Company. |
Location and inspection. | |
135. Subject to and in accordance with the provisions of the Act, the Directors shall cause to be prepared and to be laid before the Company in General Meeting such profit and loss accounts, balance sheets, group accounts (if any) and reports as may be necessary. |
Presentation of accounts. | |
136. A copy of every balance sheet and profit and loss account which is to be laid before a General Meeting of the Company (including every document required by the Act to be annexed thereto) together with a copy of every report of the Auditors relating thereto and of the Directors report shall not less than fourteen days before the date of the Meeting be sent to every Member of, and every holder of debentures (if any) of, the Company and to every other person who is entitled to receive notices from the Company under the provisions of the Act or of these Articles. Provided that this Article shall not require a copy of these documents to be sent to any person of whose address the Company is not aware or to more than one of the joint holders of a share in the Company or the several persons entitled thereto in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of the holder or otherwise but any Member to whom a copy of these documents has not been sent shall be entitled to receive a copy free of charge on application at the Office. |
Copies of accounts. |
32
33
141. All notices and documents (including a share certificate) with respect to any shares to which persons are jointly entitled shall be given to whichever of such persons is named first on the Register and notice so given shall be sufficient notice to all the holders of such shares. |
Service of notices in respect of joint holders. | |||||||
142. Any Member with a registered address shall be entitled to have served upon him at such address any notice to which he is entitled under these Articles, except where the Member has an electronic mailing address notified to the Company for the purpose of receiving electronic communication whereupon any notice may be served by the Company to the Member concerned by electronic communication at the said electronic mailing address. |
Members shall be served at registered address. | |||||||
143. A person entitled to a share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of a Member or otherwise upon supplying to the Company such evidence as the Directors may reasonably require to show his title to the share, and upon supplying also an address for the service of notice, shall be entitled to have served upon him at such address any notice or document to which the Member but for his death or bankruptcy or otherwise would be entitled and such service shall for all purposes be deemed a sufficient service of such notice or document on all persons interested (whether jointly with or as claiming through or under him) in the share. Save as aforesaid any notice or document delivered or sent by post to or left at the registered address of any Member or given, sent or served to any Member using electronic communications in pursuance of these Articles shall (notwithstanding that such Member be then dead or bankrupt or in liquidation or otherwise not entitled to such share and whether or not the Company has notice of the same) be deemed to have been duly served or delivered in respect of any share registered in the name of such Member as sole or first-named joint holder. |
Service of notices after death etc. on a Member. | |||||||
144. (A) Any notice given in conformity with Article 140 shall be deemed to have been given at any of the following times as may be appropriate: |
When service effected. | |||||||
(a) | when it is delivered personally to the Member, at the time when it is so delivered; | |||||||
(b) | when it is sent by prepaid mail to an address in Singapore or by prepaid air-mail to an address outside Singapore, on the day following that on which the notice was put into the post; and | |||||||
(c) | when the notice is sent by telefax or electronic communication, on the day it is so sent or transmitted. | |||||||
(B) In proving such service, sending or transmission, it shall be sufficient to prove that the letter containing the notice or document was properly addressed and put into the post as a prepaid letter or air-mail letter as the case may be or that a telefax or the electronic communication was properly addressed and transmitted in the manner provided in the Act. |
34
145. Any notice on behalf of the Company or of the Directors shall be deemed effectual if it purports to bear the signature of the Secretary or other duly authorised officer of the Company, whether such signature is printed or written. |
Signature on notice. | |||||||
146. When a given number of days notice or notice extending over any other period is required to be given the day of service shall not, unless it is otherwise provided or required by these Articles or by the Act, be counted in such number of days or period. |
Day of service not counted. | |||||||
147. (A) Notice of every General Meeting shall be given in the manner hereinbefore authorised to: |
Notice of General Meeting. |
|||||||
(a) | every Member; | |||||||
(b) | every person entitled to a share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy or otherwise of a Member who but for the same would be entitled to receive notice of the Meeting; and | |||||||
(c) | the Auditors. | |||||||
(B) No other person shall be entitled to receive notices of General Meetings. |
||||||||
148. The provisions of Articles 140, 144, 145 and 146 shall apply mutatis mutandis to notices of meetings of Directors or any committee of Directors. |
Notice of meetings of Directors or any committee of Directors. | |||||||
WINDING UP |
||||||||
149. If the Company is wound up (whether the liquidation is voluntary, under supervision, or by the Court) the liquidator may, with the authority of a Special Resolution, divide among the Members in specie or kind the whole or any part of the assets of the Company and whether or not the assets shall consist of property of one kind or shall consist of properties of different kinds and may for such purpose set such value as he deems fair upon any one or more class or classes of property to be divided as aforesaid and may determine how such division shall be carried out as between the Members or different classes of Members. The liquidator may, with the like authority, vest the whole or any part of the assets in trustees upon such trusts for the benefit of Members as the liquidator with the like authority thinks fit and the liquidation of the Company may be closed and the Company dissolved but so that no Member shall be compelled to accept any shares or other securities in respect of which there is a liability. |
Distribution of assets in specie. |
35
INDEMNITY | ||||||||
150. Subject to the provisions of and so far as may be permitted by the Statutes, every Director, Auditor, Secretary or other officer of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates shall be entitled to be indemnified by the Company against all costs, interest, charges, losses, expenses and liabilities incurred by him in the execution and discharge of his duties and where he serves at the request of the Company as a director, officer, employee or agent of any subsidiary or affiliate of the Company or in relation thereto including any liability by him in defending any proceedings, civil or criminal, which relate to anything done or omitted or alleged to have been done or omitted by him as a director, officer or employee or agent of the Company and in which judgment is given in his favour (or the proceedings otherwise disposed of without any finding or admission of any material breach of duty on his part) or in which he is acquitted or in connection with any application under statute for relief from liability in respect of any such act or omission in which relief is granted to him by the court, provided that there is no conflict with the Statutes. Without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing no Director, Manager, Secretary or other officer of the Company shall be liable for the acts, receipts, neglects or defaults of any other Director or officer or for joining in any receipt or other act for conformity or for any loss or expense happening to the Company through the insufficiency or deficiency of title to any property acquired by order of the Directors for or on behalf of the Company or for the insufficiency or deficiency of any security in or upon which any of the moneys of the Company shall be invested or for any loss or damage arising from the bankruptcy, insolvency or tortious act of any person with whom any moneys, securities or effects shall be deposited or left or for any other loss, damage or misfortune whatever which shall happen in the execution of the duties of his office or in relation thereto unless the same happen through his own negligence, wilful default, breach of duty or breach of trust. |
Indemnity of Directors and officers. |
|||||||
SECRECY |
||||||||
151. No Member shall be entitled to require discovery of or any information respecting any detail of the Companys trade or any matter which may be in the nature of a trade secret, mystery of trade or secret process which may relate to the conduct of the business of the Company and which in the opinion of the Directors it will be inexpedient in the interest of the Members of the Company to communicate to the public save as may be authorised by law or required by the listing rules of any stock exchange upon which shares in the Company may be listed. |
Secrecy. |
|||||||
PERSONAL DATA |
||||||||
152. (A) A Member who is a natural person is deemed to have consented to the collection, use and disclosure of his personal data (whether such personal data is provided by that Member or is collected through a third party) by the Company (or its agents or service providers) from time to time for any of the following purposes: |
Personal data. |
|||||||
(a) | implementation and administration of any corporate action by the Company (or its agents or service providers); |
36
(b) | internal analysis and/or market research by the Company (or its agents or service providers); | |||||||
(c) | investor relations communications by the Company (or its agents or service providers); | |||||||
(d) | administration by the Company (or its agents or service providers) of that members holding of shares in the capital of the Company; | |||||||
(e) | implementation and administration of any service provided by the Company (or its agents or service providers) to its members to receive notices of meetings, annual reports and other shareholder communications and/or for proxy appointment, whether by electronic means or otherwise; | |||||||
(f) | processing, administration and analysis by the Company (or its agents or service providers) of proxies and representatives appointed for any General Meeting (including any adjournment thereof) and the preparation and compilation of the attendance lists, minutes and other documents relating to any General Meeting (including any adjournment thereof); | |||||||
(g) | implementation and administration of, and compliance with, any provision of these Articles; | |||||||
(h) | compliance with any applicable laws, listing rules, take-over rules, regulations and/or guidelines; and | |||||||
(i) | purposes which are reasonably related to any of the above purposes. | |||||||
(B) Any Member who appoints a proxy and/or representative for any General Meeting and/or any adjournment thereof is deemed to have warranted that where such Member discloses the personal data of such proxy and/or representative to the Company (or its agents or service providers), that Member has obtained the prior consent of such proxy and/or representative for the collection, use and disclosure by the Company (or its agents or service providers) of the personal data of such proxy and/or representative for the purposes specified in Article 152(A)(f), and is deemed to have agreed to indemnify the Company in respect of any penalties, liabilities, claims, demands, losses and damages as a result of such Members breach of warranty. |
37
NAME, ADDRESS AND OCCUPATION OF SUBSCRIBER
KENON HOLDINGS LTD. Registration No. 201406588W 80 Raffles Place #26-01 Singapore 048624
Executed for and on behalf of: KENON HOLDINGS LTD.
Name: Director/Authorised Person |
Dated this day of
38
Exhibit 4.2
REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
THIS REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is made and entered into as of by and between (the Company ), a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore, and Kenon Holdings Ltd., a company incorporated under the laws of Singapore ( Kenon ). The Company and Kenon are referred to collectively herein as the Parties .
WHEREAS, the Company is a power generation holding company that is intending to register its outstanding ordinary shares under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act ) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission ) and list them for trading on the New York Stock Exchange ( NYSE ) under the symbol ICP;
WHEREAS, unless the context otherwise requires, capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed in Section 1 ;
WHEREAS, following the initial public offering and sale of the Companys ordinary shares (the Ordinary Shares ) by the Company in its initial public offering, Kenon expects to own Ordinary Shares, constituting approximately % of the Ordinary Shares to be outstanding following this offering;
WHEREAS, the Parties intend that the registration rights set forth in this Agreement be applicable to all outstanding Ordinary Shares which are or may be owned by Kenon and by any of its Affiliates at any time during the term of this Agreement, and to all of the Ordinary Shares that may be issued or granted at any time in the future on account or by virtue of such Ordinary Shares, as set out in the definition of Registrable Securities below;
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION of the mutual covenants and agreements contained in this Agreement, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
1. | Definitions |
As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth in this Section 1 :
Affiliate of any specified Person means any other person which, directly or indirectly, is in control of, is controlled by, or is under common control with, such specified Person. For purposes of this definition, control of a Person means the power, direct or indirect, to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of such Person, whether through ownership of voting securities, by contract or otherwise; and the terms controlling and controlled have meanings correlative to the foregoing.
Agreement has the meaning set forth in the preamble.
Automatic Shelf Registration Statement means an automatic shelf registration statement as defined under Rule 405.
Business Day means any day other than a Saturday, a Sunday or a day on which commercial banks in New York, New York, Singapore, London, United Kingdom or Lima, Peru, are required or authorized to be closed.
Commission has the meaning set forth in the recitals.
Company has the meaning set forth in the preamble, and includes any successor thereto.
Demand Notice has the meaning set forth in Section 2(a) .
Demand Registration has the meaning set forth in Section 2(a) .
Effective Date means the time and date that a Registration Statement is first declared effective by the Commission or otherwise becomes effective.
Effectiveness Period has the meaning set forth in Section 2(a) .
Exchange Act means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Indemnified Persons has the meaning set forth in Section 5 .
Kenon has the meaning set forth in the recitals, and includes any transferee or assignee to whom Kenon assigns its rights, in whole or in part, and any transferee or assignee thereof to whom a transferee or assignee assigns its rights, in accordance with Section 7 .
Losses has the meaning set forth in Section 5 .
NYSE has the meaning set forth in the recitals.
Ordinary Shares has the meaning set forth in the recitals.
Parties has the meaning set forth in the preamble.
Person means an individual or group, corporation, partnership, trust, incorporated or unincorporated association, joint venture, limited liability company, joint stock company, government (or an agency or subdivision thereof) or other entity of any kind.
Piggyback Notice has the meaning set forth in Section 2(b) .
Piggyback Registration has the meaning set forth in Section 2(b) .
Piggyback Request has the meaning set forth in Section 2(b) .
Pledge Holder has the meaning set forth in Section 7(e)(ii) .
Proceeding means any action, claim, suit, proceeding or investigation (including a preliminary investigation or partial proceeding, such as a deposition) pending or known to the Company to be threatened.
2
Prospectus means the prospectus included in a Registration Statement (including a prospectus that includes any information previously omitted from a prospectus filed as part of an effective Registration Statement in reliance upon Rule 430A promulgated under the Securities Act), as amended or supplemented by any prospectus supplement, with respect to the terms of the offering of any portion of the Registrable Securities covered by a Registration Statement and all other amendments and supplements to the Prospectus, including post-effective amendments, and all material incorporated by reference or deemed to be incorporated by reference in such Prospectus.
Registrable Securities means (i) any Ordinary Shares owned by Kenon during the term of this Agreement, and (ii) any shares issued or issuable with respect to such Ordinary Shares as a result of any stock split, stock dividend, rights offering, recapitalization, merger, exchange or similar event or otherwise.
Registration Expenses has the meaning set forth in Section 4 .
Registration Statement means a registration statement in the form required to register the resale of the Registrable Securities under the Securities Act and other applicable law, and including any Prospectus, amendments and supplements to each such registration statement or Prospectus, including pre- and post-effective amendments, all exhibits thereto, and all material incorporated by reference or deemed to be incorporated by reference in such registration statement.
Rule 144 means Rule 144 promulgated by the Commission pursuant to the Securities Act, as such Rule may be amended from time to time, or any similar rule or regulation hereafter adopted by the Commission having substantially the same effect as such Rule.
Rule 405 means Rule 405 promulgated by the Commission pursuant to the Securities Act, as such Rule may be amended from time to time, or any similar rule or regulation hereafter adopted by the Commission having substantially the same effect as such Rule.
Rule 415 means Rule 415 promulgated by the Commission pursuant to the Securities Act, as such Rule may be amended from time to time, or any similar rule or regulation hereafter adopted by the Commission having substantially the same effect as such Rule.
Rule 424 means Rule 424 promulgated by the Commission pursuant to the Securities Act, as such Rule may be amended from time to time, or any similar rule or regulation hereafter adopted by the Commission having substantially the same effect as such Rule.
Rule 433 means Rule 433 promulgated by the Commission pursuant to the Securities Act, as such Rule may be amended from time to time, or any similar rule or regulation hereafter adopted by the Commission having substantially the same effect as such Rule.
Securities Act has the meaning set forth in the recitals.
3
Selling Expenses means all underwriting discounts, selling commissions and stock transfer taxes applicable to the sale of Registrable Securities and fees and disbursements of counsel for Kenon.
Shelf Registration Statement has the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(iii) .
Suspension Period has the meaning set forth in Section 2(a) .
Trading Day means a day during which trading in the Ordinary Shares generally occurs on the NYSE.
Unaffiliated Board Members has the meaning set forth in Section 2(a)(iii) .
WKSI means a well known seasoned issuer as defined under Rule 405.
Unless the context requires otherwise: (a) any pronoun used in this Agreement shall include the corresponding masculine, feminine or neuter forms; (b) references to Articles and Sections refer to Articles and Sections of this Agreement; (c) the terms include, includes, including or words of like import shall be deemed to be followed by the words without limitation; (d) the terms hereof, herein or hereunder refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this Agreement; (e) unless the context otherwise requires, the term or is not exclusive and shall have the inclusive meaning of and/or; (f) defined terms herein will apply equally to both the singular and plural forms and derivative forms of defined terms will have correlative meanings; (g) references to any law or statute shall include all rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and references to any law or statute shall be construed as including any legal and statutory provisions consolidating, amending, succeeding or replacing the applicable law or statute; (h) references to any Person include such Persons successors and permitted assigns; and (i) references to days are to calendar days unless otherwise indicated.
2. | Registration |
(a) | Demand Registration |
(i) | Kenon shall have the option and right, exercisable by delivering a written notice to the Company (a Demand Notice ), to require the Company to, pursuant to the terms of and subject to the limitations contained in this Agreement, prepare and file with the Commission a Registration Statement registering the offering and sale of the number and type of Registrable Securities on the terms and conditions specified in the Demand Notice in accordance with the intended timing and method or methods of distribution thereof specified in the Demand Notice, which may include sales on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 (the Demand Registration ). |
(ii) |
Following receipt of a Demand Notice, the Company shall file a Registration Statement as promptly as practicable covering all of the Registrable Securities that Kenon requests on such Demand Notice to be included in such Demand Registration in accordance with the terms |
4
and conditions of this Agreement and shall use its reasonable best efforts to cause such Registration Statement to become effective under the Securities Act and remain effective under the Securities Act for not less than twenty four (24) months following the Effective Date or such shorter period when all Registrable Securities covered by such Registration Statement have been sold (the Effectiveness Period ); provided, however , (i) that the Company shall not be required to effect the registration of Registrable Securities pursuant to this Section 2(a) unless the Registrable Securities are offered at an aggregate proposed offering price of not less than $25 million and (ii) the Effectiveness Period shall be extended by one (1) day for each additional day during any Suspension Period in effect following the Effective Date applicable thereto pursuant to Section 2(a)(iii) . Subject to the other limitations contained in this Agreement, the Company is not obligated hereunder to effect more than three (3) Demand Registrations in any twelve (12) month period. A registration will not count as a requested registration under this Section 2(a) until the Registration Statement relating to such registration has been declared effective by the Commission and unless Kenon was able to register all the Registrable Securities requested by it to be included in such registration. |
(iii) | Notwithstanding any other provision of this Section 2(a) , the Company shall: |
(A) not be required to file a Registration Statement pursuant to this Section 2(a) during the period starting with the date thirty (30) days prior to a good faith estimate by the majority of the members of the board of directors of the Company (excluding any members of the board of directors that are employees or Affiliates of Kenon (other than directors that are independent under NYSE standards)) (the Unaffiliated Board Members ), of the date of filing of, and ending on a date ninety (90) days after the effective date of, a Company initiated registration; provided that the Company is actively employing its reasonable best efforts to cause such registration statement to become effective;
(B) not be required to effect a registration or file a Registration Statement for a period of up to one hundred twenty (120) days after the date of a Demand Notice for registration pursuant to this Section 2(a) if at the time of such request (1) the Company is engaged, or has plans to engage, within thirty (30) days of the time of such Demand Notice, in a firm commitment underwritten public offering of Ordinary Shares, or (2) the Company is currently engaged in a self-tender or exchange offer and the filing of a Registration Statement would cause a violation of the Exchange Act;
(C) not be required to effect a registration or file a Registration Statement for a period of up to ninety (90) days, if (1) the Unaffiliated Board Members determine such registration would render the Company unable to comply with applicable securities laws or (2) the
5
Unaffiliated Board Members determine such registration would require premature disclosure of material information that the Company has a bona fide business purpose for preserving as confidential; or
(D) if the Company has filed a shelf registration statement pursuant to a Demand Notice under this Section 2(a) and has included Registrable Securities therein (each such Registration Statement, a Shelf Registration Statement ), be entitled to suspend, for a reasonable period of time not in excess of 45 consecutive days and not more than 90 days in any 12-month period (except as a result of a review of any post-effective amendment by the Commission before declaring any post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement effective; provided , that the Company has used its reasonable best efforts to cause such post-effective amendment to be declared effective), the offer or sale of Registrable Securities pursuant to such registration statement by any holder of Registrable Securities if:
(1) a road show is not then in progress with respect to a proposed offering of Registrable Securities by such holder; and,
(2) either
(A) the Unaffiliated Board Members, in good faith, determine that (i) the offer or sale of any shares of Ordinary Shares would materially impede, delay or interfere with a significant transaction under negotiation by the Company, including any proposed financing, offer or sale of securities, acquisition, merger, tender offer, business combination, corporate reorganization, or consolidation, (ii) after the advice of counsel, the sale of Ordinary Shares covered by the Shelf Registration Statement would require disclosure of non-public material information not otherwise required to be disclosed under applicable law, and (iii) either (x) the Company has a bona fide business purpose for preserving the confidentiality of the proposed transaction, (y) disclosure would have a material adverse effect on the Company or the Companys ability to consummate the proposed transaction, or (z) the proposed transaction renders the Company unable to comply with requirements of the Commission; or
(B) the Unaffiliated Board Members, in good faith, determine that the Company is required by law, rule or regulation to supplement the Shelf Registration Statement or file a post-effective amendment to the Shelf Registration Statement in order to incorporate information into the Shelf Registration Statement for the purpose of (i) including in the Shelf Registration Statement any Prospectus required under Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act or (ii) reflecting in the Prospectus included in the Shelf Registration Statement any facts or events arising after the effective date of the Shelf
6
Registration Statement (or the most recent post-effective amendment) that, individually or in the aggregate, represents a fundamental change in the information set forth in the Prospectus
(any such period referred to in this Section 2(a)(iii) , a Suspension Period ); provided, however , that in the event the Company postpones, defers or suspends any Demand Registration pursuant to Section 2(a)(iii)(C)(1) or (2) or Section 2(a)(iii)(D) , then during such Suspension Period, the Company shall not engage in any transaction involving the offer, issuance, sale, or purchase of Ordinary Shares (whether for the benefit of the Company or a third Person), except transactions involving the issuance or purchase of Ordinary Shares as contemplated by Company employee benefit plans or employee or director arrangements.
In order to suspend the use of the registration statement pursuant to this Section 2(a)(iii)(D) , the Company shall promptly upon determining to seek such suspension, deliver to the holders of Registrable Securities included in such registration statement, a certificate signed by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company stating that the Company is suspending use of such registration statement pursuant to Section 2(a)(iii)(D) , the basis therefor in reasonable detail and a good faith estimate as to the anticipated duration of such suspension.
(iv) | The Company may include in any such Demand Registration other Ordinary Shares for sale for its own account or for the account of any other Person; provided that if the managing underwriter for the offering determines that the number of Ordinary Shares proposed to be offered in such offering would likely have an adverse effect in any material respect on the price, timing or distribution of the Ordinary Shares proposed to be included in such offering or the market for the Ordinary Shares, then the Registrable Securities to be sold by Kenon shall be included in such registration before any Ordinary Shares proposed to be sold for the account of the Company or any other Person. |
(v) |
Subject to the limitations contained in this Agreement, the Company shall effect any Demand Registration on Form F-3 (except if the Company is not then eligible to register for resale the Registrable Securities on Form F-3, in which case such Demand Registration shall be effected on another appropriate form for such purpose pursuant to the Securities Act) and if the Company becomes, and is at the time of its receipt of a Demand Notice, a WKSI, the Demand Registration for any offering and selling of Registrable Securities through a firm commitment underwriting shall be effected pursuant to an Automatic Shelf Registration Statement, which shall be on Form F-3 or any equivalent or successor form under the Securities Act (if available to the Company); provided , however , that if at any time a Registration Statement on Form F-3 is effective and Kenon provides written notice |
7
to the Company that it intends to effect an offering of all or part of the Registrable Securities included on such Registration Statement, the Company will amend or supplement such Registration Statement as may be necessary in order to enable such offering to take place. |
(vi) | Without limiting Section 3 , in connection with any Demand Registration pursuant to and in accordance with this Section 2(a) , the Company shall, (A) promptly prepare and file or cause to be prepared and filed (1) such additional forms, amendments, supplements, prospectuses, certificates, letters, opinions and other documents, as may be necessary or advisable to register or qualify the securities subject to such Demand Registration, including under the securities laws of such states as Kenon shall reasonably request; provided , however , that no such qualification shall be required in any jurisdiction where, as a result thereof, the Company would become subject to general service of process or to taxation or qualification to do business in such jurisdiction solely as a result of registration and (2) such forms, amendments, supplements, prospectuses, certificates, letters, opinions and other documents as may be necessary to apply for listing or to list the Registrable Securities subject to such Demand Registration on the NYSE and (B) do any and all other acts and things that may be necessary or appropriate or reasonably requested by Kenon to enable Kenon to consummate a public sale of such Registrable Securities in accordance with the intended timing and method or methods of distribution thereof. |
(b) | Piggyback Registration |
(i) | If the Company shall at any time propose to file a Registration Statement, other than pursuant to any Demand Registration, for an offering of Ordinary Shares for cash (whether in connection with a public offering of Ordinary Shares by the Company, a public offering of Ordinary Shares by shareholders, or both, but excluding an offering relating solely to an employee benefit plan, an offering relating to a transaction on Form F-4 or an offering on any registration statement form that does not permit secondary sales), the Company shall promptly notify Kenon of such proposal reasonably in advance of (and in any event at least five (5) Trading Days before) the anticipated filing date (the Piggyback Notice ). The Piggyback Notice shall offer Kenon the opportunity to include for registration in such Registration Statement the number of Registrable Securities as it may request (a Piggyback Registration ). The Company shall include in each such Piggyback Registration such Registrable Securities for which the Company has received written requests within five (5) days after delivery to Kenon of the Piggyback Notice ( Piggyback Request ) for inclusion therein. If Kenon decides not to include all of its Registrable Securities in any Registration Statement thereafter filed by the Company, Kenon shall nevertheless continue to have the right to include any Registrable Securities in any subsequent registration statement or registration statements as may be filed by the Company with respect to offerings of Ordinary Shares, all upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. |
8
(ii) | If the Registration Statement under which the Company gives notice under this Section 2(b) is for an underwritten offering, the Company shall so advise Kenon. In such event, the right of Kenon to be included in a registration pursuant to this Section 2(b) shall be conditioned upon Kenons participation in such underwriting and the inclusion of Kenons Registrable Securities in the underwriting to the extent provided herein. In the event Kenon proposes to distribute its Registrable Securities through such underwriting, it shall enter into an underwriting agreement in customary form with the underwriter or underwriters selected for such underwriting by the Company. If the managing underwriter or managing underwriters of such offering advise the Company and Kenon in writing that in their reasonable opinion that the inclusion of all of Kenons Registrable Securities in the subject Registration Statement (or any other Ordinary Shares proposed to be included in such offering) would likely have an adverse effect in any material respect on the price, timing or distribution of the Ordinary Shares proposed to be included in such offering or the market for the Ordinary Shares, the Company shall include in such offering only that number or amount, if any, of Ordinary Shares proposed to be included in such offering that, in the reasonable opinion of the managing underwriter or managing underwriters, will not have such effect, with such number to be allocated as follows: (i) first, to the Company or the Person or Persons demanding such underwritten offering and (ii) if there remains availability for additional Ordinary Shares to be included in such registration, second, to all other holders of Ordinary Shares (including Kenon) who are contractually entitled to piggyback registration rights that are equivalent to those described in this Section 2(b) and who may be seeking to register such Ordinary Shares, pro-rata among them, based on the number of Ordinary Shares such other holders are entitled to include in such registration. If Kenon disapproves of the terms of any such underwriting, it may elect to withdraw therefrom by written notice to the Company and the managing underwriter(s) delivered on or prior to the time of pricing of such offering. Any Registrable Securities withdrawn from such underwriting shall be excluded and withdrawn from the registration. |
(iii) | The Company shall have the right to terminate or withdraw any registration initiated by it under this Section 2(b) prior to the Effective Date of such Registration Statement whether or not Kenon has elected to include Registrable Securities in such Registration Statement. The registration expenses of such withdrawn registration shall be borne by the Company in accordance with Section 4 hereof. |
(c) | Subject to Section 2(a)(ii) , all registration rights granted under this Section 2 shall continue to be applicable with respect to Kenon for so long as may be required for Kenon to sell all of the Registrable Securities held by Kenon (without any limitation on volume, timing, recipients or intended method or methods of distribution, including through the use of an underwriter, that would not be applicable with a registration under the Securities Act). |
9
(d) | Any Demand Notice or Piggyback Request shall (i) specify the Registrable Securities intended to be offered and sold by Kenon, (ii) express Kenons present intent to offer such Registrable Securities for distribution, (iii) describe the nature or method of the proposed offer and sale of Registrable Securities, which may include sales on a delayed or continuous basis and (iv) contain the undertaking of Kenon to provide all such information and materials and take all action as may reasonably be required in order to permit the Company to comply with all applicable requirements in connection with the registration of such Registrable Securities. |
(e) | Kenon shall not have any right to obtain or seek an injunction restraining or otherwise delaying any such registration as the result of any controversy that might arise with respect to the interpretation or implementation of this Section 2 . |
(f) | The Company will not enter into any agreement during the term of this Agreement which would allow any holder of Ordinary Shares to include Ordinary Shares in any Registration Statement filed by the Company in a manner that would violate or restrict in any material respect the rights granted to Kenon hereunder. |
(g) | Any Registrable Security will cease to be an Registrable Security when (a) it has been sold or otherwise transferred by Kenon (other than a transfer by Kenon to an Affiliate or in conjunction with an assignment of this Agreement permitted under Section 7 ) or (b) it is eligible for sale pursuant to Rule 144 (or any successor provision) under the Securities Act without restriction pursuant to such rule on the volume of securities that may be sold in any single transaction. |
3. | Registration Procedures |
The procedures to be followed by the Company and Kenon in a Registration Statement pursuant to this Agreement, and the respective rights and obligations of the Company and Kenon, with respect to the preparation, filing and effectiveness of such Registration Statement, are as follows:
(a) | The Company will, at least five (5) Business Days prior to the anticipated filing of a Registration Statement or any related Prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto (other than amendments and supplements that do nothing more than name Kenon and provide information with respect thereto), (i) unless available to Kenon through public filings with the Commission, furnish to Kenon and its underwriters, if any, copies of all such documents proposed to be filed and (ii) use its reasonable efforts to address in each such document when so filed with the Commission such comments as Kenon reasonably shall propose within three (3) Business Days of the delivery of such copies to Kenon. |
10
(b) | The Company will use reasonable best efforts to as promptly as reasonably possible (i) prepare and file with the Commission such amendments, including post-effective amendments, and supplements to each Registration Statement and the Prospectus used in connection therewith as may be necessary under applicable law to keep such Registration Statement continuously effective with respect to the disposition of all Registrable Securities covered thereby for its Effectiveness Period and, subject to the limitations contained in this Agreement, prepare and file with the Commission such additional Registration Statements in order to register for resale under the Securities Act all of the Registrable Securities held by Kenon; (ii) cause the related Prospectus to be amended or supplemented by any required prospectus supplement, and as so supplemented or amended to be filed pursuant to Rule 424; and (iii) respond to any comments received from the Commission with respect to each Registration Statement or any amendment thereto and, as promptly as reasonably possible provide Kenon true and complete copies of all correspondence from and to the Commission relating to such Registration. |
(c) | The Company will comply in all material respects with the provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act with respect to the Registration Statements and the disposition of all Registrable Securities covered by each Registration Statement. |
(d) |
The Company will notify Kenon as promptly as reasonably practicable: (i)(A) when a Prospectus or any prospectus supplement or post-effective amendment to a Registration Statement is proposed to be filed; (B) when the Commission notifies the Company whether there will be a review of such Registration Statement and whenever the Commission comments in writing on such Registration Statement; and (C) with respect to each Registration Statement or any post-effective amendment thereto, when the same has been declared effective; (ii) of any request by the Commission or any other federal or state governmental authority for amendments or supplements to a Registration Statement or Prospectus or for additional information that pertains to Kenon as sellers of Registrable Securities; (iii) of the issuance by the Commission of any stop order suspending the effectiveness of a Registration Statement covering any or all of the Registrable Securities or the initiation of any Proceedings for that purpose; (iv) of the receipt by the Company of any notification with respect to the suspension of the qualification or exemption from qualification of any of the Registrable Securities for sale in any jurisdiction, or the initiation or threatening of any Proceeding for such purpose; and (v) of the occurrence of (but not the nature or details concerning) any event or passage of time that makes any statement made in such Registration Statement or Prospectus or any document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated therein by reference untrue in any material respect or that requires any revisions to such Registration Statement, Prospectus or other documents so that, in the case of such Registration Statement or the Prospectus, as the case may be, it will not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading ( provided, however , that no |
11
notice by the Company shall be required pursuant to this clause (v) in the event that the Company either promptly files a prospectus supplement to update the Prospectus or a Form 6-K or other appropriate Exchange Act report that is incorporated by reference into the Registration Statement, which in either case, contains the requisite information that results in such Registration Statement no longer containing any untrue statement of material fact or omitting to state a material fact necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading). |
(e) | The Company will use its reasonable best efforts to avoid the issuance of, or, if issued, obtain the withdrawal of (i) any order suspending the effectiveness of a Registration Statement, or (ii) any suspension of the qualification (or exemption from qualification) of any of the Registrable Securities for sale in any jurisdiction, at the earliest practicable moment, or if any such order or suspension is made effective during any Suspension Period, at the earliest practicable moment after the Suspension Period is over. |
(f) | During the Effectiveness Period, the Company will furnish to Kenon and its underwriter(s), if any, without charge, at least one conformed copy of each Registration Statement and each amendment thereto and all exhibits to the extent requested by Kenon (including those incorporated by reference) promptly after the filing of such documents with the Commission; provided , that the Company will not have any obligation to provide any document pursuant to this clause that is available on the Commissions EDGAR system. |
(g) | The Company will promptly deliver to Kenon and its underwriter(s), if any, without charge, as many copies of each Prospectus or Prospectuses (including each form of prospectus) and each amendment or supplement thereto as Kenon and its underwriter(s), if any, may reasonably request during the Effectiveness Period. The Company consents to the use of such Prospectus and each amendment or supplement thereto by Kenon in connection with the offering and sale of the Registrable Securities covered by such Prospectus and any amendment or supplement thereto. |
(h) | The Company will facilitate the timely preparation and delivery of certificates representing Registrable Securities to be delivered to a transferee pursuant to a Registration Statement, which certificates shall be free of all restrictive legends indicating that the Registrable Securities are unregistered or unqualified for resale under the Securities Act, Exchange Act or other applicable securities laws, and to enable such Registrable Securities to be in such denominations and registered in such names as Kenon may request in writing. In connection therewith, if required by the Companys transfer agent, the Company will promptly, after the Effective Date of the Registration Statement, cause an opinion of counsel as to the effectiveness of the Registration Statement to be delivered to and maintained with its transfer agent, together with any other authorizations, certificates and directions required by the transfer agent which authorize and direct the transfer agent to issue such Registrable Securities without any such legend upon sale by Kenon of such Registrable Securities under the Registration Statement. |
12
(i) | Upon the occurrence of any event contemplated by Section 3(d)(v) , subject to Section 2(a)(iii) , as promptly as reasonably possible, the Company will prepare a supplement or amendment, including a post-effective amendment, if required by applicable law, to the affected Registration Statement or a supplement to the related Prospectus or any document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated therein by reference, and file any other required document so that, as thereafter delivered, no Registration Statement nor any Prospectus will contain an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. |
(j) | Kenon may distribute the Registrable Securities by means of an underwritten offering; provided that (i) Kenon provide written notice to the Company of their intention to distribute Registrable Securities by means of an underwritten offering, (ii) the managing underwriter or managing underwriters thereof shall be designated by Kenon in the case of a Demand Registration ( provided , however , that such designated managing underwriter or managing underwriters shall be reasonably acceptable to the Company) or by the Company in the case of a registration initiated by the Company, (iii) Kenon agrees to enter into an underwriting agreement in customary form and sell Kenons Registrable Securities on the basis provided in any underwriting arrangements approved by the Persons entitled to select the managing underwriter or managing underwriters hereunder and (v) Kenon will complete and execute all questionnaires, powers of attorney, indemnities and other documents reasonably required under the terms of such underwriting arrangements. The Company hereby agrees with Kenon that, in connection with any underwritten offering in accordance with the terms hereof, it will negotiate in good faith and execute all indemnities, underwriting agreements and other documents reasonably required under the terms of such underwriting arrangements, including using all reasonable best efforts to procure customary legal opinions and auditor comfort letters at the Companys expense. |
(k) | In the event Kenon seek to complete an underwritten offering, for a reasonable period prior to the filing of any Registration Statement and throughout the Effectiveness Period, the Company will make available upon reasonable notice at the Companys principal place of business or such other reasonable place for inspection by the managing underwriter or managing underwriters selected in accordance with Section 3(j) such financial and other information and books and records of the Company, and cause the officers, employees, counsel and independent certified public accountants of the Company to respond to such inquiries, as shall be reasonably necessary (and in the case of counsel, not violate an attorney-client privilege in such counsels reasonable belief) to conduct a reasonable investigation within the meaning of Section 11 of the Securities Act. |
(l) | In connection with any registration of Registrable Securities pursuant to this Agreement, the Company will take all commercially reasonable actions as are necessary or advisable in order to expedite or facilitate the disposition of Registrable Securities by Kenon, including causing appropriate officers and employees to be available, on a customary basis and upon reasonable notice, to meet with prospective investors in presentations, meetings and road shows. |
13
4. | Registration Expenses |
All Registration Expenses incident to the Parties performance of or compliance with their respective obligations under this Agreement or otherwise in connection with any Demand Registration or Piggyback Registration (excluding any Selling Expenses) shall be borne by the Company, whether or not any Registrable Securities are sold pursuant to a Registration Statement. Registration Expenses shall include, without limitation, (i) all registration and filing fees (including fees and expenses (A) with respect to filings required to be made with the NYSE and (B) in compliance with applicable state securities or Blue Sky laws), (ii) printing expenses (including expenses of printing certificates for Ordinary Shares and of printing prospectuses if the printing of prospectuses is reasonably requested by Kenon), (iii) messenger, telephone and delivery expenses, (iv) fees and disbursements of counsel, auditors and accountants for the Company, (v) Securities Act liability insurance, if the Company so desires such insurance and (vi) fees and expenses of all other Persons retained by the Company in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. In addition, the Company shall be responsible for all of its expenses incurred in connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement (including expenses payable to third parties and including all salaries and expenses of their officers and employees performing legal or accounting duties), the expense of any annual audit and the fees and expenses incurred in connection with the listing of the Registrable Securities on the NYSE.
5. | Indemnification |
If requested by Kenon, the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless each underwriter, if any, engaged in connection with any registration referred to in Section 2 and provide representations, covenants, opinions and other assurances to any underwriter in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to such underwriter and the Company.
Further, the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless Kenon, its Affiliates and each of their respective officers and directors and any Person who controls Kenon (within the meaning of the Securities Act) and any agent thereof (collectively, Indemnified Persons ), to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, from and against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, joint or several, costs (including reasonable costs of preparation and reasonable attorneys fees) and expenses, judgments, fines, penalties, interest, settlements or other amounts arising from any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, in which any Indemnified Person may be involved, or is threatened to be involved, as a party or otherwise, under the Securities Act or otherwise (collectively, Losses ), as incurred, arising out of or relating to any untrue or alleged untrue statement of a material fact contained in any Registration Statement under which any Registrable Securities were registered, in any preliminary prospectus (if used prior to the Effective Date of such Registration Statement), or in any summary or final prospectus or free writing prospectus or in any amendment or supplement thereto (if used during the period the Company is required to keep the
14
Registration Statement current), or arising out of, based upon or resulting from the omission or alleged omission to state therein a material fact required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements made therein, in the light of the circumstances in which they were made, not misleading; provided, however , that the Company shall not be liable to any Indemnified Person to the extent that any such claim arises out of, is based upon or results from an untrue or alleged untrue statement or omission or alleged omission made in such Registration Statement, such preliminary, summary or final prospectus or free writing prospectus or such amendment or supplement, in reliance upon and in conformity with written information furnished to the Company by or on behalf of such Indemnified Person specifically for use in the preparation thereof. The Company shall notify Kenon promptly of the institution, threat or assertion of any Proceeding of which the Company is aware in connection with the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, this Section 5 shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement indefinitely.
Promptly after receipt by any Indemnified Persons under this Section 5 of notice of the commencement of any action or proceeding (including any governmental action or proceeding) involving a Loss, such Indemnified Persons shall, if a Loss in respect thereof is to be claimed against any indemnifying party under this Section 5 , deliver to the indemnifying party a written notice of the commencement thereof, and the indemnifying party shall have the right to participate in, and, to the extent the indemnifying party so desires, jointly with any other indemnifying party similarly noticed, to assume control of the defense thereof with counsel mutually satisfactory to the indemnifying party and the Indemnified Persons; provided, however , that the Indemnified Persons shall have the right to retain their own counsel with the fees and expenses of not more than one counsel for such Indemnified Persons to be paid by the indemnifying party if the representation by such counsel of the Indemnified Persons and the indemnifying party would be inappropriate due to actual or potential differing interests between such Indemnified Persons and any other party represented by such counsel in such proceeding. In the case of Indemnified Persons, legal counsel referred to in the immediately preceding sentence shall be selected by Kenon. The Indemnified Persons shall cooperate with the indemnifying party in connection with any negotiation or defense of any such Losses by the indemnifying party and shall furnish to the indemnifying party all information reasonably available to the Indemnified Persons which relates to such Losses. The failure to deliver written notice to the indemnifying party within a reasonable time of the commencement of any such action shall not relieve such indemnifying party of any liability to the Indemnified Persons under this Section 5 , except to the extent that the indemnifying party is prejudiced in its ability to defend such action but the omission to so notify the indemnifying party will not relieve such indemnifying party of any liability that it may have to any Indemnified Persons otherwise than under this Section 5 .
6. | Facilitation of Sales Pursuant to Rule 144 |
To the extent it shall be required to do so under the Exchange Act, the Company shall timely file the reports required to be filed by it under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act (including the reports under Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act referred to in subparagraph (c)(1) of Rule 144), and shall take such further action as Kenon may reasonably request, all to the extent required from time to time to enable
15
Kenon to sell Registrable Securities without registration under the Securities Act within the limitations of the exemption provided by Rule 144. Upon the request Kenon in connection with Kenons sale pursuant to Rule 144, the Company shall deliver to Kenon a written statement as to whether it has complied with such requirements.
7. | Miscellaneous |
(a) | Remedies |
In the event of a breach by the Company of any of its obligations under this Agreement, Kenon, in addition to being entitled to exercise all rights granted by law and under this Agreement, including recovery of damages, will be entitled to specific performance of its rights under this Agreement. The Company agrees that monetary damages would not provide adequate compensation for any losses incurred by reason of a breach by it of any of the provisions of this Agreement and further agrees that, in the event of any action for specific performance in respect of such breach, it shall waive the defense that a remedy at law would be adequate.
(b) | Discontinued Disposition |
Kenon agrees by its acquisition of such Registrable Securities that, upon receipt of a notice from the Company of the occurrence of any event of the kind described in clauses (ii) through (v) of Section 3(d) , Kenon will forthwith discontinue disposition of such Registrable Securities under the Registration Statement until Kenons receipt of the copies of the supplemental Prospectus or amended Registration Statement or until it is advised in writing by the Company that the use of the applicable Prospectus may be resumed, and, in either case, has received copies of any additional or supplemental filings that are incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference in such Prospectus or Registration Statement. The Company may provide appropriate stop orders to enforce the provisions of this Section 7(b) .
(c) | Amendments and Waivers |
No provision of this Agreement may be waived or amended except in a written instrument signed by the Company and Kenon. No waiver of any default with respect to any provision, condition or requirement of this Agreement shall be deemed to be a continuing waiver in the future or a waiver of any subsequent default or a waiver of any other provision, condition or requirement hereof, nor shall any delay or omission of any Party to exercise any right hereunder in any manner impair the exercise of any such right.
(d) | Notices |
Any and all notices or other communications or deliveries required or permitted to be provided hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed given and effective on the earliest of (i) the date of transmission, if such notice or communication is delivered via facsimile or electronic mail as specified in
16
this Section 7(d) prior to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) on a Business Day, (ii) the Business Day after the date of transmission, if such notice or communication is delivered via facsimile or electronic mail as specified in this Agreement later than 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) on any date and earlier than 11:59 p.m. (Eastern Standard Time) on such date, (iii) the Business Day following the date of mailing, if sent by nationally recognized overnight courier service or (iv) upon actual receipt by the Party to whom such notice is required to be given. The address for such notices and communications shall be as follows:
If to the Company: | [Company] | |||
Av. Santo Toribio 115, Piso 7 San Isidro Lima, Peru Attention: Daniel Urbina General Counsel |
||||
Phone: +51 1 708 2200 | ||||
E-Mail: daniel.urbina@icpower.com | ||||
If to Kenon or any of its Affiliates: | Kenon Holdings Ltd. | |||
1 Temasek Avenue #36-01 Millenia Tower Singapore 039192 Attention: Robert Rosen General Counsel |
||||
Phone: +65 6351 1780 | ||||
E-Mail: robertr@kenon-holdings.com |
(e) | Successors and Assigns |
(i) | This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their heirs, executors, administrators, successors, legal representatives and permitted assigns. Except as provided below in Section 7(e)(ii) and any transfers to Affiliates of Kenon, this Agreement, and any rights or obligations hereunder, may not be assigned without the prior written consent of the Company and Kenon. |
(ii) | The rights under this Agreement shall be freely assignable by Kenon, in whole or in part at any time and from time to time during the Registration Period, to any transferee or recipient of all or any portion of Kenons Registrable Securities if: (i) the transferee or recipient is, or will become immediately following the transfer from Kenon, the holder of at least five percent (5%) of the Companys issued and outstanding share capital at that time, and (ii) Kenon agrees in writing with the transferee or recipient to assign such rights and the transferee or recipient agrees in writing with the Company to be bound by all of the provisions contained herein in the form attached as Appendix A hereto. |
17
(iii) | In order to assign any number of Demand Registrations, the holder of the right to such Demand Registrations shall expressly assign any number of Demand Registrations that it may hold pursuant to an agreement in the form attached as Appendix A hereto and such assignment shall correspondingly reduce the number of Demand Registrations held by Kenon or any other assignor. |
At the transferees or recipients request, the Company shall promptly prepare and file any required prospectus supplement under Rule 424(b)(3) of the Securities Act or other applicable provision of the Securities Act to appropriately amend the list of selling shareholders thereunder to include such transferee or recipient.
(iv) | In the event Kenon transfers Registrable Securities included on a Registration Statement in connection with the foreclosure of a pledge of such Registrable Securities and, following the transfer, such Registrable Securities would not be eligible for sale pursuant to Rule 144 (or any successor provision) under the Securities Act without restriction pursuant to such rule on the volume of securities that may be sold in any single transaction, then (A) at the request of the new holder of such Registrable Securities (the Pledge Holder ), the Company shall amend or supplement such Registration Statement as may be necessary in order to enable such Pledge Holder to offer and sell such Registrable Securities pursuant to such Registration Statement; provided that in no event shall the Company be required to file a post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement unless (X) such Registration Statement includes only Registrable Securities held by the Pledge Holder, Affiliates of the Pledge Holder or transferees of the Pledge Holder or (Y) the Company has received a written consent therefor from every Person for whom Ordinary Shares have been registered on (but not yet sold under) such Registration Statement, other than the Pledge Holder, Affiliates of the Pledge Holder or transferees of the Pledge Holder and (B) all of the rights and obligations of the Company and the Pledge Holder with respect to such Registrable Securities granted under Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 shall continue to be applicable with respect to such Registrable Securities until the earlier of (X) the time required for the Pledge Holder to sell all of the Registrable Securities held by the Pledge Holder or (Y) the end of the Effectiveness Period of the Registration Statement relating to such Registrable Securities. |
(f) | Third Party Beneficiaries |
This Agreement is intended for the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective successors and permitted assigns, and is not for the benefit of, nor may any provision hereof be enforced by, any other person
18
(g) | Execution and Counterparts |
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same Agreement. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile or electronic mail transmission, such signature shall create a valid binding obligation of the Party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) the same with the same force and effect as if such signature delivered by facsimile or electronic mail transmission were the original thereof.
(h) | Governing Law |
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York. Each party hereby irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the State of New York located in New York County and the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for the purpose of any suit, action, proceeding or judgment relating to or arising out of this Agreement and the Transactions contemplated hereunder. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO WAIVES ANY RIGHT TO REQUEST A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LITIGATION WITH RESPECT TO THE AGREEMENT.
(i) | Cumulative Remedies |
The remedies provided herein are cumulative and not exclusive of any remedies provided by law. Failure of any party to exercise any right or remedy under this Agreement or otherwise, or delay by a party in exercising such right or remedy, shall not operate as a waiver thereof.
(j) | Severability |
If any term, provision, covenant or restriction of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the terms, provisions, covenants and restrictions set forth herein shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated, and the Parties shall use their reasonable efforts to find and employ an alternative means to achieve the same or substantially the same result as that contemplated by such term, provision, covenant or restriction. It is hereby stipulated and declared to be the intention of the Parties that they would have executed the remaining terms, provisions, covenants and restrictions without including any of such that may be hereafter declared invalid, illegal, void or unenforceable.
(k) | Entire Agreement |
This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement among the Parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersede all prior contracts or agreements with respect to the subject matter hereof and the matters addressed or governed hereby, whether oral or written.
19
(l) | Headings; Section References; Mutual Drafting |
The headings in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the meaning hereof. Unless otherwise stated, references to Sections, Schedules and Exhibits are to the Sections, Schedules and Exhibits of this Agreement.
The language used in this Agreement will be deemed to be the language chosen by the Parties to express their mutual intent and no rules of strict construction will be applied against any Party.
(m) | Other Listings |
To the extent that the Company lists its shares on any stock exchange outside of the United States, the provisions of this Agreement shall apply, mutatis mutandis , to such listing.
[THIS SPACE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
20
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
[COMPANY] |
||
By: | ||
Name: | ||
Title: | ||
KENON HOLDINGS LTD. | ||
By: | ||
Name: | ||
Title: |
21
Appendix A
22
Tripartite Transfer and Amendment Agreement
THIS TRIPARTITE TRANSFER AND AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (the Transfer Agreement ) is made on this [●] day of [●] 20[●] by and between [●] (the New Shareholder ), (the Company ) and [●] (the Transferor ) and is supplemental to and an amendment of the Registration Rights Agreement (the Agreement ) dated [●], 2015, as amended from time to time, and made by and between the Company and Kenon Holdings Ltd. ( Kenon ).
1. | The New Shareholder hereby confirms that it has been supplied with a copy of the Agreement and hereby covenants with the Company to observe, perform and be bound by all the terms of the Agreement which are capable of applying to the Transferor as a holder of Registrable Securities (as defined in the Agreement) and which have not been performed at the date of this Transfer Agreement to the intent and effect that the New Shareholder shall be deemed with effect from the date hereof to be a Party to the Agreement. |
2. | The Transferor hereby confirms that it has transferred [● percent (●%)] of the Companys issued and outstanding share capital to the New Shareholder (the Share Transfer ) and thereby also wishes to and hereby does assign to the New Shareholder an equal pro-rata share of its rights as a holder of Registrable Securities under the Agreement (the Assignment of Rights ). |
3. | The Transferor hereby expressly assigns [●] number of Demand Registrations in any twelve (12) month period to the New Shareholder and agrees that this assignment shall correspondingly decrease the number of Demand Registrations in any twelve (12) month period available to the Transferor under the Agreement. |
4. | The Company hereby confirms and acknowledges the Share Transfer and Assignment of Rights on the terms set forth herein. |
5. | The New Shareholder confirms that its details for Section 7(d) (Notices) are as follows: [●]. |
6. | This Transfer Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without regard to the choice of law principles thereof. |
[THIS SPACE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY]
23
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.
[NEW SHAREHOLDER] | ||
By: | ||
Name: | ||
Title: | ||
[COMPANY] |
||
By: | ||
Name: | ||
Title: | ||
[TRANSFEROR] | ||
By: | ||
Name: | ||
Title: |
24
Exhibit 5.1
[ On the letterhead of WongPartnership LLP ]
Dear Sirs
[ ] (THE COMPANY ) REGISTRATION STATEMENT IN RESPECT OF THE INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERING (THE OFFERING ) OF SHARES IN THE ISSUED ORDINARY SHARE CAPITAL OF THE COMPANY
A. | Introduction |
1. | We have acted as Singapore legal advisers to the Company, a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Singapore, as to Singapore law in connection with the Offering and we refer to the registration statement on Form F-1 (File No. 333-206667) (as amended, the Registration Statement ) which was filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC ) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act ) on 31 August 2015. The Registration Statement covers the Offering in relation to (a) new ordinary shares of the Company (the Offering Shares ) and (b) up to an additional new ordinary shares of the Company which may be purchased by the Underwriters (as defined below) pursuant to an option to purchase additional shares granted by the Company (the Additional Shares , together with the Offering Shares, the Relevant Shares ) pursuant to the Agreement (as defined below). |
We do not express or imply any opinion with respect to the effect of any law other than the laws of the Republic of Singapore as at the date of this opinion, and have made no investigation of any other laws which may be relevant to the documents submitted or made available to us or opinions given by us, nor do we express or imply any opinion on matters relating to tax. This opinion is to be governed by and construed in accordance with Singapore law as applied by the courts of the Republic of Singapore as at the date of this opinion. All references to the laws of Singapore or a specific law of Singapore in this opinion are references to Singapore law as applied by the courts of the Republic of Singapore as at the date of this opinion. We are not obliged to update this opinion to reflect, or notify any addressee of this opinion or any other person of, any legal or legislative developments, or other changes to law or fact, arising after the date of this opinion.
In respect of the Agreement and the Registration Statement, we have assumed due compliance with all matters concerning the laws of the United States of America and all other relevant jurisdictions (other than in the Republic of Singapore in respect of the matters set out in paragraph 5 of this opinion).
B. | Documents |
2. | In rendering this opinion, we have examined: |
2.1 | an electronic copy (in Adobe Acrobat form) of the proposed form of the underwriting agreement (filed as Exhibit 1.1 to the Registration Statement on ) (the Agreement ) to be entered into among (i) the Company, (ii) Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, (iii) Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and (iv) each of the other underwriters named in Schedule A of the Agreement (the Underwriters ); |
2.2 | an electronic copy (in Adobe Acrobat form) of the Registration Statement; |
2.3 | an electronic copy (in Adobe Acrobat form) of the Bizfile Certificate Confirming Incorporation of Company dated 4 May 2015 issued by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority of Singapore ( ACRA ); |
2.4 | an electronic copy (in Adobe Acrobat form) of the Notice Under Section 31(3) of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 of Singapore dated 2015 issued by ACRA confirming the Companys conversion from a company limited by shares into a public company and the change of its name; |
2.5 | an electronic copy (in Adobe Acrobat form) of the memorandum of association of the Company (the Memorandum of Association ), as executed and adopted by Kenon Holdings Ltd. as subscriber on 4 May 2015 and as amended by way of special resolution by Kenon Holdings Ltd. ( Kenon ) as the sole shareholder of the Company on 2015; |
2.6 | an electronic copy (in Adobe Acrobat form) of the articles of association of the Company (the Articles of Association and together with the Memorandum of Association, the Constitutive Documents ), as adopted by way of special resolution by Kenon as the sole shareholder of the Company on 2015; |
2.7 | electronic copies (in Adobe Acrobat form) of the minutes and resolutions in writing of the Board of Directors of the Company dated 4 May 2015, and (collectively, the Board Resolutions ); |
2.8 | [electronic copies (in Adobe Acrobat form) of the minutes and resolution in writing of the pricing committee of the Company (established by the Board of Directors of the Company in connection with the Offering) dated (the Pricing Committee Resolutions );] |
2.9 | electronic copies (in Adobe Acrobat form) of the minutes and resolutions passed by Kenon, as the sole shareholder of the Company on , and (the Shareholder Resolutions , and together with the Board Resolutions and the Pricing Committee Resolutions, the Resolutions ); and |
2.10 | such other documents as we may have considered necessary or desirable in order that we may render this opinion. |
3. | Save as expressly provided in paragraph 5 of this legal opinion, we express no opinion whatsoever with respect to any agreement or document described in paragraphs 2 and 7 of this opinion. |
C. | Assumptions |
4. | We have assumed (without enquiry and with your consent): |
4.1 | the authenticity of all documents submitted and made available to us as originals, and the completeness, and conformity to originals, of all copies of documents submitted and made available to us and that the signatures on all original documents or copies thereof are genuine and that each signature is that of a person duly authorised to affix the same and execute the relevant documents; |
4.2 | that each document submitted and made available to us for review, is true, complete and up-to-date, has not been revoked, amended or superseded, and all representations, warranties and factual statements contained therein are true and correct; |
4.3 | that the Resolutions: |
(a) | were duly passed at properly convened meetings of duly appointed directors or duly appointed committees of directors of the Company or the sole shareholder of the Company, or as the case may be, duly passed in the form of circulating resolutions in writing, in accordance with the provisions of the Articles of Association; |
(b) | were duly passed in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, Chapter 50 of Singapore (the Companies Act ); and |
(c) | have not been revoked, rescinded, superseded or amended and are in full force and effect, and that no other resolution or other action has been taken which could affect the validity of any or all of such resolutions; |
4.4 | that the directors of the Company: |
(a) | have been duly appointed in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act and the Constitutive Documents; |
(b) | have acted in good faith and in the best interests of the Company in approving the execution of, and entry into, the Agreement, and without intention to defraud any of the creditors of the Company; and |
(c) | have each disclosed any interest which he may have in the transactions contemplated in the Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act and the Constitutive Documents and none of the directors of the Company has any interest in such transactions except to the extent permitted by the Companies Act and the Constitutive Documents; |
4.5 | (a) that the result of the electronic instance information search made by us on 2015 at [a.m./p.m.] (Singapore time) of the public records of the Company maintained by ACRA at https:www.acra.gov.sg (the ACRA Search ) at the ACRA is true, complete and accurate, and remains correct up-to-the date of this opinion; (b) such information has not since the relevant time on which the ACRA Searches were conducted, been altered; and (c) the ACRA Search did not fail to disclose any information which has been lodged, registered or filed but did not appear on the public records available for such electronic searches at the time of such searches, and all matters which ought to have been lodged, registered, or filed with ACRA have been duly lodged, registered, or filed; |
4.6 | that no law (including, without limitation, any public policy) of any jurisdiction outside Singapore is relevant to or affects the opinions expressed or conclusions stated in this opinion; |
4.7 | the Agreement filed with the SEC will be substantially in the form of the final underwriting agreement to be executed in relation to the Offering; and |
4.8 | that neither the Agreement nor any of the transactions contemplated thereunder constitutes a sham. |
D. | Opinion |
5. | Based on the foregoing and subject to the assumptions set out in this opinion and having regard to such legal considerations as we have deemed relevant and subject to any matters not disclosed to us, we are of the opinion that the Relevant Shares, when issued and delivered by the Company in accordance with its Constitutive Documents, and the terms of the executed Agreement by the Company pursuant to the laws of the Republic of Singapore against payment of the aggregate offering price of the Relevant Shares and upon due registration of such shares in the names of the persons who have subscribed for or purchased the Relevant Shares in the Register of Members of the Company, will be (a) duly authorised by the Company for issuance; (b) validly issued and non-assessable; and (c) fully paid. |
E. | Qualifications |
6. | This opinion is subject to the following qualifications: |
6.1 | for the purposes of this opinion, we have assumed that the term non-assessable (a term which has no recognised meaning under Singapore law) in relation to the Relevant Shares means that holders of such shares, having fully paid up all amounts due on such shares, are under no further personal liability to make payments to the Company or its creditors or contribute to the assets or liabilities of the Company in their capacities purely as holders of such shares; |
6.2 | we have not investigated or verified the accuracy or completeness of the facts and information (including any statements of foreign law) or the reasonableness of any assumptions, statements of opinion or intention, contained in the documents referred to in paragraph 2 of this opinion. We do not express any opinions as to any matters of fact generally, including statements of foreign law, or the reasonableness of any statements of opinion, contained in the Agreement. In addition, we are not responsible for investigating or verifying whether any material fact has been omitted from such documents; |
6.3 | we have relied on electronic searches of the publicly available records of ACRA and the records disclosed by such searches may not be complete or up-to-date; and |
6.4 | this opinion is strictly limited to matters stated in this opinion and is not to be construed as extending (by implication or otherwise) to all the documents listed in paragraph 2 of this opinion, or to any other matter or document in connection with, referred to, contemplated by or incorporated by reference, in such documents. |
7. | We hereby consent to the use of our opinion as herein set forth as an exhibit to the Registration Statement and to the use of our name under the caption Legal Matters in the prospectus forming a part of the Registration Statement. In giving this consent, we do not hereby admit that we come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the Securities Act. |
8. | The opinion given herein is strictly limited to the matters stated herein and is not to be read as extending by implication to any other matter in connection with the Offering, or otherwise including, but without limitation, any other document signed in connection with the Offering. Further, save for the filing of this opinion with the SEC as an exhibit to the Registration Statement, this opinion is not to be circulated to, or relied upon by, any other person (other than persons entitled to rely on it pursuant to applicable provisions of federal securities law in the United States of America, if applicable) or quoted or referred to in any public document or filed with any governmental body or agency without our prior written consent. |
Yours faithfully,
WONGPARTNERSHIP LLP
Exhibit 10.8
PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THE OMISSIONS HAVE BEEN INDICATED BY ASTERISKS ([***]), AND THE OMITTED TEXT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
Execution Copy
NOBLE ENERGY MEDITERRANEAN LTD.
DELEK DRILLING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
ISRAMCO NEGEV 2 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AVNER OIL EXPLORATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
DOR GAS EXPLORATION LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
and
OPC ROTEM LTD.
GAS SALE AND
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
DATED November 25, 2012
INDEX
Article | Title | Page | ||||
1 |
Definitions | 5 | ||||
2 |
Period of Agreement and Commissioning | 17 | ||||
3 |
Agreement for Sale and Purchase | 35 | ||||
4 |
Warranties Covenants and Taxes | 36 | ||||
5 |
Sellers Rights, Commingling and Unitization | 43 | ||||
6 |
Quantities and Nominations | 44 | ||||
7 |
Facilities | 50 | ||||
8 |
Exchange of Information | 51 | ||||
9 |
Take or Pay | 55 | ||||
10 |
Price and Price Adjustment | 60 | ||||
11 |
Billing and Payment | 67 | ||||
12 |
Quality | 74 | ||||
13 |
Delivery Point | 76 | ||||
14 |
Pressure | 77 | ||||
15 |
Measurement | 78 | ||||
16 |
Force Majeure | 79 | ||||
17 |
Default | 83 | ||||
18 |
Assignment and Security Interests | 88 | ||||
19 |
Governing Law and Dispute Resolution | 93 | ||||
20 |
Security and Credit Cover | 102 | ||||
21 |
Gas Agreements with [***] | 104 | ||||
22 |
Relationship and Sellers Coordinator | 105 | ||||
23 |
Miscellaneous Provisions | 108 |
2
Schedule
1. | Buyers Site |
2. | Sellers Percentages |
3. | [***] |
4. | List of Existing Agreements |
5. | Form of Bank Guarantee |
6. | Form of [***] |
7. | Form of Letter of Credit |
8. | Specification |
3
THIS AGREEMENT is signed in Tel-Aviv, Israel on the 25 th day of November 2012 BETWEEN
(1) | Noble Energy Mediterranean Ltd ., a Cayman Islands company that has limited liability, having its principal place of business at 12 Abba Eban Boulevard, Herzlia, 46725 Israel ( Noble ); |
Isramco Negev 2 Limited Partnership , an Israeli limited partnership having its principal place of business at 8 Granit Street, Petach Tikva, 49222, Israel ( Isramco );
Delek Drilling Limited Partnership , an Israeli limited partnership having its principal place of business at 12 Abba Eban Boulevard, Herzlia, 46725, Israel ( Delek Drilling );
Avner Oil Exploration Limited Partnership , an Israeli limited partnership having its principal place of business at 12 Abba Eban Boulevard, Herzlia, 46725 Israel ( Avner ); and
Dor Gas Exploration Limited Partnership , an Israeli limited partnership having its principal place of business at France Building, Europark, P.O.B 10, Yakum, 60972, Israel ( Dor );
(each a Seller and together the Sellers ) of the one part; and
(2) | O.P.C. Rotem Ltd. , an Israeli limited liability company having its principal place of business at 19 Haarbaa St., Tel Aviv, Israel (the Buyer ) of the other part. |
The Sellers on the one part and the Buyer on the other part are a Party to this Agreement and the Sellers and the Buyer are collectively Parties to this Agreement.
WHEREAS
The Sellers desire to sell to the Buyer and the Buyer desires to buy from the Sellers at the Delivery Point Natural Gas during the Contract Period upon and subject to the terms and conditions herein contained.
4
NOW IT IS HEREBY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. | Definitions |
1.1 | Defined Terms |
Except where the context otherwise indicates or requires the following terms in this Agreement shall have the following meanings:
1.1.1 | Adjusted Annual Contract Quantity or Adjusted ACQ has the meaning set out in 9.1.2. |
1.1.2 | Affected Party has the meaning set out in Article 16.7. |
1.1.3 | Affiliate means a company, partnership or other legal entity, which controls, is controlled by, or which is controlled by an entity that controls, any of the Sellers or the Buyer. Control means the ownership, directly or indirectly, of more than fifty percent (50%) of the equity rights and/or the voting rights, and/or the power to appoint more than half of the directors, in a company, partnership or other legal entity. [***]. With respect to any of the Sellers that are limited partnerships, Affiliates shall include the general partner of such limited partnership, and any company, partnership or other legal entity, which controls, or which is controlled by an entity that controls the general partner. |
1.1.4 | Allocation Order has the meaning set out in Article 6.3.3. |
1.1.5 | Annual Contract Quantity or ACQ has the meaning set out in Article 6.1. |
1.1.6 | Annual Reconciliation Statement has the meaning set out in Article 11.2.1. |
1.1.7 | Annual Take or Pay Quantity has the meaning set out in Article 9.3.1. |
1.1.8 | Anti-Trust Consent means an approval of a restrictive arrangement (as such term is defined in the Israel Restrictive Trade Practices Law 1988), to be granted by the appropriate court or an exemption from the approval of a restrictive arrangement to be granted by the Anti-Trust Commissioner under the Israel Restrictive Trade Practices Law 1988, such consent or approval to be final and unconditional or, if not, then subject to conditions which have been agreed to by the Party or Parties to whom such conditions apply. |
5
1.1.9 | Arbitration has the meaning set out in Article 19.2.2. |
1.1.10 | Availability Date has the meaning set out in Article 2.2. |
1.1.11 | Bar means pressure equal to one hundred thousand (100,000) Pascals (Pascal: as defined in ISO 1000:1991 as modified in 1998). |
1.1.12 | BTU means an amount of heat equal to one thousand and fifty-five decimal zero six (1,055.06) Joules (Joules: as defined in ISO 1000:1991 as modified in 1998). |
1.1.13 | Business Day means any day on which banks are open for business in Israel. |
1.1.14 | Buyers Facilities means the combined cycle gas turbine power plant with an installed capacity of approximately 440 MW to be constructed by the Buyer at the Buyers Site and all facilities and equipment required to be installed by or on behalf of the Buyer and its Affiliates for the purposes of enabling the Buyer to receive at Buyers Site Specification Gas to be delivered under this Agreement at the Delivery Point, but excluding the Downstream System. |
1.1.15 | Buyers Site means the Buyers Site identified in part 1 of Schedule 1 hereto. |
1.1.16 | Calendar Quarter means a period of three (3) consecutive calendar months beginning on January 1, April 1, July 1, or October 1. |
1.1.17 | Calendar Year means a period beginning at 0600 on the first day of January in any calendar year and ending at 0600 on the first day of January of the next succeeding calendar year. |
1.1.18 | Carry Forward has the meaning set out in Article 9.2.1. |
1.1.19 | Carry Forward Aggregate has the meaning set out in Article 9.2.2. |
1.1.20 | Charged Assets has the meaning set out in Article 18.4.3. |
1.1.21 | Commencement Date means the first Day immediately following the last day of the Commissioning Period. |
1.1.22 | Commissioning Period has the meaning set out in Article 2.4.1. |
1.1.23 |
Consequential Loss means any damages, costs, or liabilities, or any losses or deferments of revenue, profit, opportunity or use, regardless of cause or arising, |
6
which are not immediately and directly caused by the relevant act or omission, including: (a) any indirect damage, cost, or liability arising out of any delay, reduction or loss of ability to produce, store, transport, process or dispose of Gas or any products derived from Gas; (b) any indirect damage, cost, or liability associated with business interruption or increased cost of working during business interruption, (c) the incremental costs of alternative fuels and the incremental cost of overhead expenses incurred; (d) any indirect, special or punitive damages and penalties of any kind; and (e) any loss or deferment of revenue, profit, opportunity, bargain, contract, expectation or opportunity. |
1.1.24 | Contract Adjustment has the meaning set out in Article 2.10. |
1.1.25 | Contract Price has the meaning set out in Article 10.1.1. |
1.1.26 | Contract Period means the period mentioned in Article 2.1.1. |
1.1.27 | Contract Year means the following periods (as applicable): |
(a) | the period beginning at 0600 on the Commencement Date and ending at 0600 on the earlier of the (i) immediately following first day of January and (ii) the Interim Period Commencement Date (if applicable); |
(b) | the period beginning at 0600 on the first day of January immediately after the Commencement Date (provided the Interim Period Commencement Date did not occur during the first Contract Year) and ending at 0600 on the first day of January in the immediately succeeding Year and thereafter during the Contract Period any successive period of twelve (12) consecutive Months commencing at 0600 on the first day of January in each Year except for the Year in which the Interim Period Commencement Date occurs (if applicable) or the Contract Period ends; |
(c) | in the year in which the Interim Period Commencement Date occurs (if applicable), the period beginning at 0600 on the first day of January and ending at 0600 on the Interim Period Commencement Date; |
(d) |
in the year in which the Interim Period End Date occurs (if applicable), the period beginning at 0600 on the Day immediately after the Interim Period End Date and ending at 0600 on the immediately following first |
7
day of January and thereafter during the Contract Period any successive period of twelve (12) consecutive Months commencing at 0600 on the first day of January in each Year except for the Year in which the Contract Period ends; and |
(e) | in the Year in which the Contract Period ends, the period beginning at 0600 on the first day of January and ending at 0600 on the last Day of the Contract Period. |
1.1.28 | Credit Cover means any of the following forms of guarantee: (i) a bank guarantee (substantially in the form set out in Schedule 5 ); or (ii) [***]; or (iii) a Letter of Credit (substantially in the form set out in Schedule 7 ) issued by a non-Israeli Bank whose international Credit Rating is not less than S&Ps rating group A+ and Moodys rating A1. |
1.1.29 | Credit Rating means in respect of an entity the corporate credit rating given to that entity by Standard & Poors Maalot, a subsidiary of Standard and Poors, a Division of the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. or its successor ( S&P ) or Midroog Ltd. a subsidiary of Moodys Investors Service, Inc. or its successor ( Moodys ). |
1.1.30 | Cubic Meter or m 3 means when applied to gas that quantity of gas which at fifteen (15) degrees Celsius and at an absolute pressure of one decimal zero one three two five (1.01325) Bar and the gas being free of water vapor, occupies the volume of one (1) cubic meter, being a meter as defined in ISO 1000: 1981(E). |
1.1.31 | Daily Delivery Tolerance has the meaning set out in Article 6.4. |
1.1.32 | Day means a period of twenty-four (24) hours beginning at 0600 on any day and ending at 0600 on the following day. |
1.1.33 | Daily Contract Quantity or DCQ has the meaning set out in Article 6.2. |
8
1.1.34 | Delivery Point has the meaning set out in Article 13.1.1. |
1.1.35 | Delivery Pressure has the meaning set out in Article 14.1. |
1.1.36 | Disclosed Information has the meaning set out in Article 8.3.1. |
1.1.37 | Dispute has the meaning set out in Article 19.2. |
1.1.38 | Distribution Network Consumers means any: (i) gas consumers that are connected to the Distribution Network ( Reshet Haluka ) as such term is defined in section 2 of the Natural Gas Sector Law, 5762-2002; and (ii) any gas marketer for resale to such consumers. |
1.1.39 | Downstream System means the pipelines, installations, the pressure reduction and metering system adjacent to Buyers Facilities and all other facilities owned and/or operated by the Transporter at or downstream of the Delivery Point, necessary for the transportation of Specification Gas from the Delivery Point to Buyers Facilities. |
1.1.40 | Effective Date means the date of signature of this Agreement. |
1.1.41 | Existing Agreements means the gas sale and purchase agreements listed in Schedule 4. |
1.1.42 | Expansion Conditions has the meaning set out in Article 2.7.3. |
1.1.43 | Expansion Date means the date on which the Expansion Project is completed. |
1.1.44 | Expansion Project means the construction and installation by or on behalf of the Sellers of additional facilities including gas storage facilities in the Yam-Tethys Reservoir, with the aim to enable delivery of Gas from the Reservoir to the Ashdod Delivery Point or at the Sellers discretion another Delivery Point (if any) that the Sellers may select, at peak rates of at least [***] MMBTU per Hour in a reliable and consistent manner. It is clarified that the Expansion Project will not include the installation of additional pipelines from the Tamar field or an increase of the maximum rate of production from the Reservoir to more than [***] MMBTU per Day. Upon completion, the Sellers Facilities will include the Expansion Project. |
9
1.1.45 | Expert means any Person appointed from time to time under and subject to the provisions of Article 19.3. |
1.1.46 | Expert Determination has the meaning set out in Article 19.2.1. |
1.1.47 | Extended Contract Period has the meaning set out in Article 2.1.2. |
1.1.48 | First Period means the period commencing on the Commencement Date and ending on the earlier of: (i) the last Day of the Contract Period; or (ii) in the event that the Reduction Notice is delivered in accordance with Article 2.8, the Day immediately prior to the commencement of the Second Period. |
1.1.49 | First Shortfall Gas has the meaning set out in Article 17.1.1. |
1.1.50 | First Shortfall Aggregate has the meaning set out in Article 17.2.1. |
1.1.51 | First Shortfall Price has the meaning set out in Article 10.2.4(a). |
1.1.52 | Floor Price has the meaning set out in Article 10.2.3. |
1.1.53 | Force Majeure has the meaning set out in Article 16.1. |
1.1.54 | Gas means either or both of Natural Gas and Specification Gas as the context may permit or require. |
1.1.55 | Gauge means the pressure in excess of one decimal zero one three two five (1.01325) Bar (which is one (1) standard atmosphere). |
1.1.56 | GTA means the gas transmission agreement dated July 13, 2010 by and between the Buyer and the Transporter for the transport of the Gas to be supplied by the Sellers hereunder from the Delivery Point to the Buyers Site. |
1.1.57 | Higher Heating Value or HHV means the superior (higher) real calorific value calculated as described in ISO: 6976:1995 (E) of one Cubic Meter of Natural Gas at the reference condition of 15/15 Degrees Celsius and 1.01325 Bar (a) for the actual natural gas in the real state. |
1.1.58 | Hour means a period of sixty (60) minutes beginning on the hour. |
1.1.59 | Indicator has the meaning set out in Article 10.1.2. |
1.1.60 | Interim Period has the meaning set out in Article 2.6.1. |
10
1.1.61 | Interim Period Commencement Date means the date on which Dalia Power Energies Ltd. commences its hot commissioning using Gas purchased from the Sellers pursuant to the gas sale and purchase agreement dated January 8, 2012 by and between the Sellers and Dalia Power Energies Ltd., or any such later date, upon which the Sellers advise the Buyer that the aggregate nominations of the buyers under the Existing Agreements and Sellers Additional Agreements will exceed the Maximum Hourly Peak Capacity. |
1.1.62 | Interim Period End Date means the earlier of: (i) the Expansion Date; or (ii) the date which the Sellers will advise the Buyer that the Sellers Facilities are capable of supplying the Buyers Proper Nominations under this Agreement on a firm non-interruptible basis. |
1.1.63 | Late Availability Date has the meaning set out in Article 2.3.1. |
1.1.64 | LCIA means the London Court of International Arbitration. |
1.1.65 | LIBOR means London Interbank Offered Rate for thirty (30) day maturities, for US Dollar deposits as published on the first banking day following any relevant due date for payment under this Agreement by the Wall Street Journal or if not so published, then by the Financial Times of London. |
1.1.66 | Maintenance has the meaning set out in Article 6.7.1. |
1.1.67 | Maintenance Period has the meaning set out in Article 6.7.1. |
1.1.68 | Make-Up Aggregate has the meaning set out in Article 9.3.4. |
1.1.69 | Maximum Hourly Peak Capacity means [***] MMBTU per Hour. |
1.1.70 | Minimum Bill Quantity or MBQ has the meaning set out in Article 9.1.3. |
1.1.71 | MMBTU means one million (1,000,000) BTUs. |
1.1.72 | Month means a period beginning at 0600 on the first day of any calendar month and ending at 0600 on the first day of the next succeeding calendar month. |
1.1.73 | [***]. |
1.1.74 | Monthly Statement has the meaning set out in Article 11.1. |
11
1.1.75 | Natural Gas means any hydrocarbons (or mixture of hydrocarbons and other gases consisting primarily of methane) which at fifteen (15) Degrees Celsius and atmospheric pressure are or is in the gaseous state. |
1.1.76 | Net Annual TOP Quantity has the meaning set out in Article 9.3.2. |
1.1.77 | New Taxes has the meaning set out in Article 4.3.3(c). |
1.1.78 | Off-Spec Gas means Natural Gas that does not conform to the Specification. |
1.1.79 | Permitted Delivery Reduction has the meaning set out in Article 2.6.5. |
1.1.80 | Person means any person, firm, partnership, association, company, body corporate, or individual. |
1.1.81 | Petroleum Law means the Israel Petroleum Law 5712-1952. |
1.1.82 | Price Control Event means the issuance, imposition or enactment of any regulation, order, or other statutorily binding action pursuant to the Israeli Prices of Commodities and Services (Supervision) Law, 5756-1996 or to any other similar law or regulation, that results in the reduction of the amount to be received by the Sellers for Gas to be delivered to the Buyer pursuant to this Agreement. |
1.1.83 | Price Period means each calendar Month during the Contract Period. |
1.1.84 | Proper Nomination has the meaning set out in Article 6.6.1. |
1.1.85 | Properly Nominated has the meaning set out in Article 6.6.1. |
1.1.86 | Provisional Contract Price has the meaning set out in Article 10.5.1(a). |
1.1.87 | Reasonable and Prudent Operator means a Person seeking in good faith to perform its contractual obligations and in so doing and in the general conduct of its undertaking exercising that degree of skill, diligence, prudence and foresight which would reasonably and ordinarily be expected from a skilled and experienced operator complying with the applicable law and industry standards engaged in the same type of undertaking under the same or similar circumstances and conditions. |
1.1.88 | Reduction Notice has the meaning set out in Article 2.8.2. |
12
1.1.89 | Reduction Option has the meaning set out in Article 2.8.1. |
1.1.90 | Reduction Ratio or RR has the meaning set out in Article 2.8.3(e). |
1.1.91 | Representative Rate means the representative rate of exchange of the New Israeli Shekel against the US Dollar, as published by the Bank of Israel from time to time. |
1.1.92 | Reservoir means that reservoir (currently known as the Tamar field) covered by the Sellers Petroleum Rights. |
1.1.93 | Second Period means the period commencing on the first (1 st ) anniversary of the date on which the Reduction Notice was delivered and ending on the last Day of the Contract Period. |
1.1.94 | Sanction has the meaning set out in Article 2.7. |
1.1.95 | Second Shortfall Gas has the meaning set out in Article 17.1.1. |
1.1.96 | Second Shortfall Aggregate has the meaning set out in Article 17.2.1. |
1.1.97 | Second Shortfall Price has the meaning set out in Article 10.2.4(b). |
1.1.98 | Sellers Additional Agreements means any gas sale and purchase agreements (including this Agreement) entered into by the Sellers from time to time which are not Existing Agreements, for the supply of Gas through the Sellers Facilities to customers in Israel, provided that during the Interim Period the Sellers firm commitment to supply Gas pursuant to the Sellers Additional Agreements will not in the aggregate exceed [***] MMBTU per Hour. |
1.1.99 | Sellers Coordinator has the meaning set out in Article 22.2.1. |
1.1.100 | Sellers Facilities means such platforms, wells, pipelines, installations and other equipment installed, owned or operated by or on behalf of the Sellers as are necessary from time to time to produce, process, transport and deliver Specification Gas from the Reservoir at the Delivery Point pursuant to this Agreement, directly or through the Yam Tethys Facilities. |
1.1.101 | Sellers Interest means the aggregate total of the Sellers Percentages. |
1.1.102 | Sellers Lenders has the meaning set out in Article 18.4. |
13
1.1.103 | Sellers Petroleum Rights mean the Petroleum Lease I/12 Tamar granted on December 2, 2009 pursuant to section 26 of the Petroleum Law, 5712-1952. |
1.1.104 | Sellers Percentage means the respective interests of each of the Sellers, as set out in Schedule 2 . |
1.1.105 | Shortfall Aggregate has the meaning set out in Article 17.2.1. |
1.1.106 | Shortfall Gas has the meaning set out in Article 17.1 and shall also include the term Shortfall. |
1.1.107 | Shortfall Price means the First Shortfall Price or the Second Shortfall Price, as applicable. |
1.1.108 | Specification has the meaning set out in Article 12.1. |
1.1.109 | Specification Gas means Natural Gas that complies with the Specification. |
1.1.110 | Take or Pay Adjustment has the meaning set out in Article 2.7.15. |
1.1.111 | Total Contract Quantity or TCQ means a quantity of Gas equal to three hundred and eighty million (380,000,000) MMBTU, or the quantity calculated in accordance with Article 2.8.3. |
1.1.112 | Transfer has the meaning set out in Article 18.2. |
1.1.113 | Transporter means the Person granted the license to transport Gas from the Delivery Point to Buyers Facilities, currently Israel Natural Gas Lines Ltd. |
1.1.114 | Week means a period of seven (7) days beginning at 0600 on a Sunday and ending at 0600 on the following Sunday. |
1.1.115 | Willful Misconduct means any act or failure to act (whether sole, joint or concurrent) by any Person, which was intended to cause, directly or indirectly, harmful consequences to another Person. |
1.1.116 | Yam-Tethys Facilities means any platforms, wells, pipelines, installations and other equipment, owned, installed or operated by or on behalf of the Yam-Tethys Partners to the extent such are used from time to time to produce, process, transport and deliver for or on behalf of the Sellers, Gas from the Reservoir via the area of the Ashkelon I/10 Lease to the Delivery Point in Ashdod pursuant to this Agreement. |
14
1.1.117 | Yam-Tethys Partners means the owners of interests in the Ashkelon I/10 Lease. |
1.1.118 | Yam-Tethys Reservoir means the Gas reservoir located in the Ashkelon I/10 Lease. |
1.1.119 | Year means a period beginning at 0600 on any day of a calendar year and ending at 0600 on the same day of the next succeeding calendar year. |
1.2 | Interpretation |
In this Agreement, Article headings and the index are inserted for convenience only and do not affect the interpretation of this Agreement; and unless the context indicates a contrary intention:
1.2.1 | the term Agreement includes the Schedules to this Agreement and any amendments to this Agreement; |
1.2.2 | the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall apply to all Schedules, unless otherwise specifically stated; the provisions of this Agreement and any Schedule shall be interpreted by the Parties so as to avoid any conflict between them; however, in the event that such a conflict cannot be avoided, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail; |
1.2.3 | references to Articles or Schedules shall be deemed to be references to Articles of or Schedules to this Agreement; |
1.2.4 | the singular shall be deemed to include the plural and vice versa except with respect to the Sellers or to a Seller; |
1.2.5 | references in this Agreement to any law, decree or statutory provision shall be deemed to include references to any regulations and orders made thereunder; |
1.2.6 | references in this Agreement to any law shall include references to such law as it may, after the Effective Date, from time to time be amended, supplemented or re-enacted; |
1.2.7 | references to time shall be construed as a reference to whatever time shall be statutorily in force in Israel; |
15
1.2.8 | the words and phrases other, including and in particular shall not limit the generality of any preceding words or be construed as being limited to the same class as the preceding words where a wider construction is possible; |
1.2.9 | where a word or phrase is defined, its other grammatical forms shall have corresponding meanings; |
1.2.10 | references to writing include any mode of representing or reproducing words, numbers, symbols or drawing in a visible form and includes by facsimile or by electronic mail; |
1.2.11 | references to any decision, determination, election, discretion or act of the Sellers under this Agreement, mean any decision, determination, election, discretion or act exercised or made unanimously or carried out jointly by the Sellers or, if applicable, by the Sellers Coordinator on behalf of all Sellers; |
1.2.12 | for the purposes of this Agreement, the energy content of Gas delivered hereunder shall be calculated in accordance with its Higher Heating Value; |
1.2.13 | the words will and shall shall be construed to have the same meaning and effect. |
16
2. | Period of Agreement and Commissioning |
2.1 | Commencement and Period |
2.1.1 | This Agreement shall come into force on the Effective Date and, subject to the provisions of Article 2.1.3, shall continue until the earlier of: (a) the sixteenth (16 th ) anniversary of the Commencement Date; and (b) the Day on which the Sellers shall have delivered to Buyer an aggregate quantity of Gas equal to the Total Contract Quantity; unless terminated earlier by either Party in accordance with the terms of this Agreement or extended in accordance with the provisions of Articles 2.1.2 or 9.4.6(a) ( Contract Period ). |
2.1.2 | In the event that by the fifteenth (15 th ) anniversary of the Commencement Date the Buyer has not taken a quantity of Gas equal to [***] MMBTU then either Party may, by written notice to be given to the other Party within thirty (30) days after such date, extend the Contract Period by an additional period commencing on the sixteenth (16 th ) anniversary of the Commencement Date and ending on the earlier of: (i) the eighteenth (18 th ) anniversary of the Commencement Date; and (ii) the date by which the Buyer will have taken from the Sellers under this Agreement an aggregate quantity of Gas equal to the Total Contract Quantity (the period from the sixteenth (16 th ) anniversary of the Commencement Date and until such later date being herein called the Extended Contract Period ). During the Extended Contract Period, the provisions of this Agreement (including, inter alia , the provisions of Article 9) shall continue to apply. |
2.1.3 | This Agreement is conditional on the Sellers and Buyer obtaining the Anti-Trust Consent. |
2.1.4 |
The Sellers and the Buyer together shall diligently pursue the application for the Anti-Trust Consent and shall take such reasonable steps as may be necessary to procure receipt thereof as soon as possible but in any event within ninety (90) days from the Effective Date. The Parties shall keep each other informed as to progress made towards obtaining the Anti-Trust Consent and shall co-operate with each other and provide reasonable assistance to each other |
17
to obtain the Anti-Trust Consent. If the Anti-Trust Consent is not obtained within ninety (90) days from the Effective Date, either Party may, provided that it has complied with its obligations under this Article 2.1.4, terminate this Agreement on not less than sixty (60) days prior written notice, and upon the expiration of such notice period this Agreement will terminate, except if, before the specified termination date, the Anti-Trust Consent is obtained. |
2.2 | Availability Date |
The Availability Date means the date on which all works at the Sellers Facilities are completed to the extent required to enable the Sellers to deliver at the Delivery Point Specification Gas in such quantities as shall enable the testing and commissioning of Sellers Facilities.
2.3 | Consequences of Delays in Availability Date |
2.3.1 | In the event that by August 1, 2013 (the Late Availability Date ) the Availability Date has not occurred (except to the extent such delay was caused by an event of Force Majeure), then Sellers shall be liable for Shortfall Gas and the provisions of Articles 17.1 and 17.2 shall apply, subject to the Sellers limitation of liability as set out in Article 17.3.5. |
2.3.2 | In the event that the delay referred to in Article 2.3.1 continues for a period of six (6) Months from August 1, 2013 (except to the extent such delay was caused by an event of Force Majeure), then at any time after such date, the Buyer may terminate this Agreement, at the Buyers sole discretion, on not less than sixty (60) days prior written notice to the Sellers, and upon the expiration of such notice period this Agreement will terminate, except if, before the specified termination date, the Availability Date has occurred. |
2.3.3 | Without derogating from the provisions of Article 2.10, if a Price Control Event occurs at any time prior to: |
(a) | the Availability Date, then the Sellers, at their sole and absolute discretion, shall be entitled to postpone the occurrence of the Late Availability Date by a period of three (3) months; or |
(b) | the Expansion Date, then the Sellers, at their sole and absolute discretion, shall be entitled to elect not to carry out or complete the Expansion Project, without any liability to the Buyer. |
18
2.3.4 | In the event that the Sellers notify the Buyer that the Sellers have postponed the occurrence of the Late Availability Date pursuant to Article 2.3.3(a), and at any time after such notice the Sellers supply Gas from the Reservoir to any other customer in Israel prior to the occurrence of the Late Availability Date, then the Availability Date shall be deemed to have occurred, the postponement invoked by the Sellers shall be automatically rescinded and the Sellers shall be obligated to supply Gas to the Buyer in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. |
2.3.5 | In the event that the Sellers notify the Buyer they have elected not to carry out or complete the Expansion Project pursuant to Article 2.3.3(b), the Buyer shall be entitled within one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date of such notice, to terminate this Agreement, by not less than twelve (12) Months prior written notice to the Sellers, provided however, that if prior to the specified termination date, Sellers notify the Buyer that they have elected to continue the Expansion Project, the Buyers termination notice shall automatically be rescinded, unless prior to such Sellers notice the Buyer had already signed a gas sale and purchase agreement with another Gas supplier in relation to the quantities of gas contemplated in this Agreement. |
2.3.6 | On termination of this Agreement under this Article 2.3, the Parties shall be discharged from any further obligations or liabilities under this Agreement, except for any liability and amounts owing which have accrued up to the date of termination in accordance with the provisions of this Article 2.3. |
2.4 | Commissioning Period |
2.4.1 | The Commissioning Period shall be a period commencing on the Availability Date and ending on the earlier of: (i) the date upon which the Buyer and the Sellers complete the commissioning of their respective facilities; and (ii) [***] days following the Availability Date. During such period (the Commissioning Period ) the Sellers and the Buyer (in liaison with the Transporter) shall in cooperation with each other carry out commissioning activities of their respective facilities. |
19
2.4.2 | During the Commissioning Period, the Sellers shall use reasonable endeavors to make available for delivery Specification Gas nominated by Buyer in such quantities and at such rates as may reasonably be requested by Buyer to carry out the commissioning and testing of the Buyers Facilities and the relevant parts of the Downstream System. |
2.4.3 | The Parties shall use reasonable endeavors: |
(a) | to co-ordinate their activities in relation to the commissioning of the facilities to the intended effect that, to the extent practicable, the Sellers Facilities, the relevant parts of the Downstream System and the Buyers Facilities will be commissioned during the Commissioning Period; and |
(b) | to facilitate generally the commissioning of each others facilities and equipment. |
2.5 | Information and Inspection |
2.5.1 | Within thirty (30) days after the Effective Date and at least once in every three (3) month period thereafter until the Availability Date, the Sellers and the Buyer shall meet and: |
(a) | the Sellers shall report on and the Parties shall discuss the state of progress of the Sellers Facilities and the plans for the development and commissioning of such facilities; |
(b) | the Buyer shall report on and the Parties shall discuss the state of progress of the Buyers Facilities and the plans for the development and commissioning of such facilities; and |
(c) | the Sellers will as soon as possible notify the Buyer of any material change in progress and of any material delay which they become aware of that might cause a delay in the Availability Date. |
2.5.2 |
On the request of Sellers, the Buyer shall allow for the inspection of the progress of the construction and installation of the Buyers Facilities, upon reasonable advance request by the Sellers, such inspection to occur during |
20
normal working hours and provided Sellers comply with Buyers standard safety and security procedures. The inspection shall be coordinated between the Parties and shall be at Sellers risk and cost. |
2.5.3 | On the request of the Buyer, the Sellers shall allow for the inspection of the progress of the construction and installation of the Sellers Facilities, upon reasonable advance request by the Buyer, such inspection to occur during normal working hours and provided Buyer complies with Sellers standard safety and security procedures. The inspection shall be coordinated between the Parties and shall be at Buyers risk and cost. |
2.5.4 | It is acknowledged and agreed that nothing in this Article 2.5 shall oblige either Party to do or omit to do anything which would: |
(a) | breach or otherwise adversely affect any bona fide commitment of confidentiality owed to any Person; or |
(b) | procure or allow any rights of access or inspection in excess of or contrary to such rights as may be legally available to and exercisable by one Party in favor of the other. |
2.6 | Interim Period |
Subject to applicable law and unless otherwise instructed by any governmental body having authority in relation to the supply of Gas under this Agreement (including any Allocation Order):
2.6.1 | During the period commencing on the Interim Period Commencement Date and ending on the Interim Period End Date (the Interim Period ), the supply by the Sellers of Gas to the Buyer under this Agreement shall be subject to the obligation of the Sellers (and the Yam-Tethys Partners as applicable) to supply Gas pursuant to the Existing Agreements in accordance with this Article 2.6. |
2.6.2 | For each Day of the Interim Period the allocation of Gas available for delivery from the Reservoir through the Sellers Facilities to customers in Israel shall be made as follows: |
(a) |
in the event that the aggregate nominations for any Hour of such Day made by the buyers under the Existing Agreements and the buyers under |
21
the Sellers Additional Agreements (including Buyers Proper Nominations under this Agreement) do not exceed the Maximum Hourly Peak Capacity, the Sellers shall make available for delivery to the Buyer the quantity Properly Nominated by the Buyer for such Hour (calculated as one twenty-fourth (1/24) of the Buyers Proper Nomination for such Day); |
(b) | in the event that the aggregate nominations for any Hour of such Day made by the buyers under the Existing Agreements and the buyers under the Sellers Additional Agreements (including Buyers Proper Nominations under this Agreement) exceed the Maximum Hourly Peak Capacity, the Sellers shall deliver Gas as required to meet in full the nominations of the buyers under the Existing Agreements, in priority to delivering Gas to the Buyer under this Agreement and to other buyers under the other Sellers Additional Agreements; and |
(c) | from the remaining quantity of Gas available for delivery by the Sellers for any Hour of such Day (if any) after allocating the quantities pursuant to Article 2.6.2(b), the Sellers shall make available for delivery to the Buyer a quantity of Gas to be calculated based on the ratio between: (i) the Buyers Proper Nomination for such Hour (calculated as one twenty-fourth (1/24) of the Buyers Proper Nomination for such Day) under this Agreement; and (ii) the total cumulative nominations for such Hour made to the Sellers by all the buyers under the Sellers Additional Agreements (including the Buyer); |
(d) | the supply of Gas by the Sellers on any Hour of such Day to other customers in Israel under any spot sales or gas sale agreements (which are not Existing Agreements or Sellers Additional Agreements), shall be effected only after the obligation of the Sellers (and the Yam-Tethys Partners as applicable) to supply Gas under the Existing Agreements and under the Sellers Additional Agreements is complied with in full. |
22
2.6.3 | In relation to the supply of Gas by the Sellers to customers in Israel during the Interim Period, and unless otherwise agreed with the Buyer, the Sellers shall not: |
(a) | add any new gas sale and purchase agreements to the list of Existing Agreements; |
(b) | add any new gas sale and purchase agreements to the Sellers Additional Agreements, except if such new agreements fall within the maximum permitted hourly quantity of the Sellers Additional Agreements pursuant to Article 1.1.99; |
(c) | deliver, pursuant to the Existing Agreements and the Sellers Additional Agreements, quantities in excess of the daily or hourly quantities they are required to deliver thereunder, except if the delivery of such excess quantities during the Interim Period will be subordinate to the Proper Nominations of the Buyer; |
(d) | amend the Existing Agreements by increasing the daily or hourly quantities that the buyers under the Existing Agreements may nominate, except if the delivery of such additional quantities during the Interim Period will be subordinate to the Proper Nominations of the Buyer; or |
(e) | amend the Sellers Additional Agreements by increasing the daily or hourly quantities that the buyers under the Sellers Additional Agreements may nominate except if such additional quantities fall within the maximum permitted hourly quantity of the Sellers Additional Agreements pursuant to Article 1.1.99 or if the delivery of such additional quantities during the Interim Period will be subordinate to the Proper Nominations of the Buyer. |
2.6.4 | For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby clarified that any Existing Agreement may be amended by extending the duration or increasing the total contract quantity of such agreement, provided however that during the Interim Period the daily or hourly quantity under an Existing Agreement of any buyer shall not be increased above the levels prior to such amendment (without duplication). |
23
2.6.5 | Until the Interim Period End Date, the Sellers shall have no liability to the Buyer for any portion of the Buyers Proper Nomination that the Sellers did not deliver to the Buyer when allocating deliveries in accordance with the provisions of Article 2.6.2(c) (such quantities shall hereinafter be referred to as Permitted Delivery Reduction ). |
2.6.6 | Notwithstanding Article 2.6.5, in the event of Shortfall Gas during the Interim Period the following provisions shall apply: |
(a) | [***], there shall be no Permitted Delivery Reductions and the provisions of Articles 17.1-17.2 shall apply; |
(b) | [***], the Permitted Delivery Reduction shall apply and the portion of the Buyers Proper Nomination that was not tendered for delivery less the Permitted Delivery Reduction will constitute Shortfall Gas and the provisions of Articles 17.1-17.2 shall apply. |
2.6.7 | [***], and on such Day the Sellers have not made such quantities available for delivery to the Buyer then the provisions of Articles 17.1-17.2 shall apply. |
2.6.8 | At the Buyers request, the Sellers will provide the Buyer a written certificate duly signed by an officer of the Sellers Coordinator on behalf of all the Sellers, confirming that the allocation of Gas was made in accordance with the provisions of this Article 2.6. |
2.6.9 | In the event that the Buyer disputes the Sellers confirmation as to the allocation of Gas with respect to any Day during the Interim Period, the Buyer may, by written notice to the Sellers, require the matter to be referred for determination by the Expert pursuant to Article 19.3, such Expert to be an independent, certified public accountant. The Expert determination shall be made, if any, once for any Calendar Quarter during the Interim Period. |
24
2.6.10 | The Expert shall review the relevant information and records of the Sellers for the sole purpose of verifying the Sellers confirmation in relation to the allocation of Gas during the relevant period. The Sellers shall make available to the Expert details of the daily and hourly quantities that each buyer is entitled to nominate under the Existing Agreements and the Sellers Additional Agreements, and such other information as may be reasonably be required by the Expert for the purposes of this determination, provided however, that all information, data or documentation disclosed or delivered to the Expert in consequence of or in connection with the Experts appointment hereunder, shall be treated as confidential and shall not be disclosed or delivered to the Buyer or any other third party in any circumstances, unless such disclosure is required by a competent authority or for the purpose of a Dispute under this Agreement. |
2.6.11 | In the event that the Expert determines that the quantity of Gas actually allocated to the Buyer during such period is less than [***] of the quantity of Gas that was due to the Buyer pursuant to Article 2.6, then the Sellers shall bear and pay the costs and expenses of such Expert Determination, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 19.3.3(c) and the provisions of Articles 17.1-17.2 shall apply to such under-delivery. |
2.6.12 | In the event that the Expert determines that the quantity of Gas actually allocated to the Buyer during such period is [***] or more of the quantity of Gas due to the Buyer pursuant to Article 2.6, then Buyer shall bear and pay the costs and expenses of such Expert Determination, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 19.3.3(c). |
2.7 | The Expansion Project |
2.7.1 |
In the event the Sellers Sanction the Expansion Project by April 30, 2013 they shall so notify the Buyer and shall employ reasonable endeavors to implement the Expansion Project in accordance with the provisions of this Article 2.7. For the purposes of this Article 2.7 Sanction means the approval by the Sellers, in accordance with the terms of the joint operating agreement between the |
25
Sellers relating to Sellers Petroleum Rights, of the program and budget for the Expansion Project. It is clarified that in the event the Sellers do not Sanction the Expansion Project, the Sellers will not be required to carry out the Expansion Project. |
2.7.2 | The Sellers shall keep the Buyer informed on a periodical basis as to the progress of the Expansion Project, including the estimated timetable for its completion. |
2.7.3 | The Expansion Project shall be subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions (the Expansion Conditions ): |
(a) | the receipt by the Sellers of all the regulatory approvals that are required (if required) in relation to the Expansion Project, from the Natural Gas Authority, Minister of Energy and Water Resources, the Petroleum Commissioner, including any approvals required for the installation and operation of storage facilities in the Yam-Tethys Reservoir, and other significant regulatory approvals identified by the Sellers during the course of the approval of the Expansion Project, in a form and on terms reasonably acceptable to the Sellers (excluding building permits); and |
(b) | land on shore in Israel to the extent required for the construction of the facilities contemplated in the Expansion Project, shall be made available to the Sellers on terms reasonably acceptable to the Sellers. |
2.7.4 | Sellers shall employ reasonable endeavors to procure that the Expansion Conditions are satisfied as soon as possible but in any event before April 30, 2013. The Sellers shall keep the Buyer informed on a periodical basis as to progress made towards achieving the Expansion Conditions. |
2.7.5 | In the event that the Sellers Sanction the Expansion Project by April 30, 2013, however, the Expansion Conditions have not been satisfied by such date, the Sellers may notify the Buyer that the Sanction is subject to the Expansion Conditions. |
2.7.6 |
In the event that (i) the Sellers did not Sanction the Expansion Project by April 30, 2013; or (ii) the Sellers Sanctioned the Expansion Project but the Expansion |
26
Conditions were not satisfied or waived by the Sellers by July 31, 2013; the Buyer shall be entitled within one hundred and eighty (180) Days from such date to terminate this Agreement, by not less than twelve (12) Months prior written notice to the Sellers, provided however, that if prior to the specified termination date, the Sellers notify the Buyer that the Sellers have Sanctioned the Expansion Project and that the Expansion Conditions are satisfied or waived by the Sellers, the Buyers termination notice shall automatically be rescinded, unless prior to the date of Sellers notice the Buyer had already signed a gas sale and purchase agreement with another Gas supplier in relation to the quantities of gas contemplated in this Agreement. |
2.7.7 | In the event that following the Buyers termination notice under Article 2.7.6 the Sellers Sanction the Expansion Project, and the Expansion Date has not occurred within thirty six (36) Months from the date on which the Expansion Conditions have been satisfied or waived by the Sellers (except to the extent such delay was caused by an event of Force Majeure) Sellers shall be liable for Shortfall Gas, and the provisions of Articles 17.1 - 17.2 shall apply, subject to the Sellers limitation of liability as set out in Article 17.3.6. |
2.7.8 | It is hereby clarified that in the event that the Sellers are delivering Gas from the Reservoir to the Ashdod Delivery Point or any other Delivery Point, at peak rates of at least [***] MMBTU per Hour in a reliable and consistent manner, by any means other than those contemplated in the Expansion Project, then in such circumstances the Expansion Date shall be deemed to have occurred as of such date. |
2.7.9 | In the event that the Sellers Sanction the Expansion Project but the Expansion Date has not occurred within thirty six (36) Months from the date on which the Expansion Conditions have been satisfied or waived by the Sellers (except to the extent such delay was caused by an event of Force Majeure) Sellers shall be liable for Shortfall Gas, and the provisions of Articles 17.1 - 17.2 shall apply, subject to the Sellers limitation of liability as set out in Article 17.3.6. |
2.7.10 |
In the event that the Sellers Sanction the Expansion Project but the Expansion Date has not occurred within forty eight (48) Months from the date the |
27
Expansion Conditions have been satisfied or waived by the Sellers (except to the extent such delay was caused by an event of Force Majeure), then the Buyer shall be entitled within one hundred and eighty (180) days from such date to terminate this Agreement, by prior written notice to the Sellers of not less than twelve (12) Months and not more than twenty (24) Months, provided however, that if prior to the specified termination date, the Interim Period End Date occurs, the Buyers termination notice shall automatically be rescinded, unless prior to the Interim Period End Date the Buyer had already signed a gas sale and purchase agreement with another Gas supplier in relation to the quantities of gas contemplated in this Agreement. |
2.7.11 | If the Delivery Point for the Expansion Project is not the Ashdod Delivery Point, the Sellers shall provide written notice to the Buyer and shall specify in such notice the selected Delivery Point and the estimated timetable for the completion of the Expansion Project in such circumstances. In the event that the Sellers notify the Buyer that the Expansion Date with respect to such selected Delivery Point shall not occur within forty eight (48) Months from the date the Expansion Conditions have been satisfied, the Buyer shall be entitled within twelve (12) Months from the date of such notice to terminate this Agreement, by not less than twelve (12) Months prior written notice to the Sellers, provided however, that if prior to the specified termination date, the Sellers notify the Buyer that the Expansion Date is expected to occur within forty eight (48) Months from the date the Expansion Conditions have been satisfied, the Buyers termination notice shall automatically be rescinded, unless prior to the date of such notice the Buyer had already signed a gas sale and purchase agreement with another Gas supplier in relation to the quantities of gas contemplated in this Agreement. |
2.7.12 | In the event that the Delivery Point for the Expansion Project is not the Ashdod Delivery Point and the Agreement was not terminated in accordance with Article 2.7.11, but the Expansion Date has not occurred within the time period stipulated in the Sellers notice of the Delivery Point pursuant to Article 2.7.9 (except to the extent such delay was caused by an event of Force Majeure) Sellers shall be liable for Shortfall Gas, and the provisions of Articles 17.1 - 17.2 shall apply, subject to the Sellers limitation of liability as set out in Article 17.3.6. |
28
2.7.13 | It is agreed that any failure or delay in obtaining any building permits or other approvals that may be required for the construction and operation of the facilities contemplated in the Expansion Project, which failure or delay could not have been prevented or overcome by the exercise by the Sellers of the standard of a Reasonable and Prudent Operator, will constitute an event of Force Majeure and the provisions of Article 16 will apply. |
2.7.14 | For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby clarified that the Interim Period is not included in the definition of Contract Year and therefore: |
(a) | during the Interim Period the provisions regarding of Articles 9.1-9.4 shall be suspended and shall not apply until the Interim Period End Date; |
(b) | any Make-Up or Carry Forward Aggregate existing on the Interim Period Commencement Date shall stand to the credit of the Buyer following the Interim Period End Date (e.g. if on December 31, 2014, the Buyer is entitled to Carry Forward Aggregate in respect of 2014 and the Interim Period commences in 2015 and ends in 2016, the calculation of the Contract Years in which the Make-Up or Carry Forward Aggregate may be used shall resume as of 2017); and |
(c) | during the Interim Period the Buyer shall be entitled to [***]. |
2.7.15 | Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 2.7.14, in the event that the Interim Period continues after [***] and the Buyer did not terminate this Agreement in the circumstances of Article 2.7.6, 2.7.10 or 2.7.11, then the Sellers may, by a written notice to the Buyer, request that the provisions of Article 9 (Take or Pay) shall apply for the period commencing on such date until the end of the Contract Period, subject to an adjustment of the MBQ in accordance with the Sellers ability to deliver Gas on a firm basis during the remaining Contract Period ( Take or Pay Adjustment ). If within ninety (90) Days of Sellers notice, the Parties fail to agree on the Take or Pay Adjustment, then either Party shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement by a ninety (90) Days prior written notice to the other Party. |
29
2.8 | The Second Period |
2.8.1 | The Buyer will have the right to reduce the DCQ, ACQ and TCQ by serving on the Sellers the Reduction Notice in accordance with this Article 2.8 (the Reduction Option ). |
2.8.2 | The exercise of the Reduction Option will be made by written notice to be delivered by the Buyer to the Sellers (the Reduction Notice ): |
(a) | no earlier than the fourth (4 th ) anniversary of the Commencement Date or January 1, 2018 (whichever is later); and |
(b) | no later than the seventh (7 th ) anniversary of the Commencement Date; or December 31, 2020 (whichever is later). |
2.8.3 | During the Second Period the DCQ, ACQ and TCQ shall be as follows: |
(a) | DCQ = ADQ x 0.5/0.6 |
Where:
DCQ means the Daily Contract Quantity (DCQ) for the Second Period;
ADQ means the average daily Gas consumption of the Buyer pursuant to this Agreement during the thirty six (36) Months preceding the Month in which the Reduction Notice was delivered to the Sellers, calculated as follows:
ADQ = S CQ/1,095
Where S CQ means (i) the cumulative quantity of Gas delivered by the Sellers to the Buyer pursuant to this Agreement during the thirty six (36) Month period preceding the Month in which the Reduction Notice was delivered to the Sellers, plus (ii) all quantities that the Sellers did not deliver to the Buyer due to Force Majeure causing a material reduction of the quantities delivered to the Buyer; less (iii) any quantity of Gas that was delivered to the Buyer by the Sellers and sold or otherwise transferred during such period in accordance with Article 3.2.
30
(b) | The ACQ during the Second Period will be calculated by reference to the new DCQ calculated in accordance with Article 2.8.3(a). |
(c) | The TCQ shall be reduced by an amount calculated as follows: |
RTCQ = RD x (DCQ RDCQ)
Where RTCQ is the amount by which the TCQ will be reduced;
RD means the number of Days from the first Day of the Second Period until the sixteenth (16 th ) anniversary of the Commencement Date;
DCQ means the Daily Contract Quantity (DCQ) for the First Period (referred to in Article 6.2.2);
RDCQ means the revised DCQ calculated in accordance with Article 2.8.3(a).
(d) | The quantities referred to in Articles 9.2.2 and 9.3.4 will be reduced in accordance with the Reduction Ratio. |
(e) | RR or Reduction Ratio means the ratio between the DCQ in the Second Period calculated in accordance with Article 2.8.3(a) and the DCQ for the First Period (referred to in Article 6.2.2). |
2.8.4 | In the event the Buyer does not deliver to the Sellers the Reduction Notice during the period specified in Article 2.8.2, the Reduction Option shall terminate and the DCQ, ACQ and TCQ (including the quantities specified in Article 2.8.3(d)) will not be reduced or amended in accordance with this Article 2.8. |
2.9 | Termination |
2.9.1 | Without prejudice to any other rights that the Sellers may have under this Agreement or pursuant to applicable law, the Sellers may terminate this Agreement by giving the Buyer not less than ninety (90) Days prior written notice, in the following circumstances, unless such act, failure or circumstance is remedied or cured within such notice period (in addition to the notice periods listed below): |
(a) | the Buyer fails to provide or renew the Credit Cover, or fails to replenish the amount secured under such Credit Cover in accordance with the requirements of Article 20; and |
(b) | in the event of a breach by the Buyer of any of its material representations, warranties, covenants or obligations contained in this Agreement, which shall not have been cured within ninety (90) Days after written notice thereof shall have been received by the Buyer. |
31
2.9.2 | Without prejudice to any other rights that the Buyer may have under this Agreement or pursuant to applicable law, the Buyer may terminate this Agreement by giving the Sellers not less than ninety (90) Days prior written notice in the following circumstances, unless such act, failure or circumstance is remedied or cured within such notice period (in addition to the notice periods listed below): |
(a) | the Sellers fail to pay to the Buyer the amount specified in Article 17.2.5 within ninety (90) Days after written notice thereof shall have been received by the Sellers from the Buyer; and |
(b) | in the event of a breach by any of the Sellers of any of their material representations, warranties, covenants or obligations contained in this Agreement, which shall not have been cured within ninety (90) Days after written notice thereof shall have been received by the Sellers. |
2.9.3 | If the Sellers are unable to deliver on a permanent basis a material part of the Specification Gas Properly Nominated by the Buyer and if in such circumstances the Buyer will have the right to terminate this Agreement, the Buyer may at its discretion elect to terminate this Agreement only with respect to the quantities the Sellers are unable to supply or in its entirety. |
2.9.4 | Without derogating from the specific termination events specified in this Article 2.9, the Sellers and the Buyer agree that they will not exercise any termination rights under this Agreement or law, except in relation to significant breaches of a material provision of this Agreement. |
32
2.9.5 | Any termination of this Agreement shall not affect any rights or obligations, which may have accrued prior to such termination. |
2.9.6 | Any notice of termination of this Agreement by the Sellers shall be given by the Sellers to the Buyer as a single notice binding on all the Sellers on the same terms and being expressed to terminate this Agreement in respect of each of the Sellers Percentages and in respect of the Sellers Interest. |
2.9.7 | Any notice of termination of this Agreement by the Buyer shall be given by the Buyer to the Sellers jointly binding on all the Sellers on the same terms and being expressed to terminate this Agreement in respect of the Sellers Interest and in respect of each of the Sellers in relation to its respective Sellers Percentage, except that in circumstances where the grounds for any such notice of termination are applicable to any one or more of the Sellers, but not all the Sellers, then such notice shall not have effect if, before its expiry, the Seller (or Sellers) in respect of which such notice has been served shall have signed an agreement or deed providing for the transfer of the relevant Sellers Percentage or as the case may be respective Sellers Percentage under this Agreement to another Seller or Sellers, or to other transferees, subject to and in compliance with the provisions of Article 18 or if the Sellers agree to continue to supply Buyers Proper Nominations. |
2.10 | Contract Adjustment |
2.10.1 | If at any time following the Effective Date a Price Control Event occurs, the Sellers may, at their sole and absolute discretion, within twelve (12) months from such occurrence, by written notice to the Buyer, request a review and a reasonable and appropriate adjustment of the relevant term or terms of this Agreement in a way that preserves the commercial balance of the Parties pursuant to this Agreement as at the date prior to such Price Control Event (the Contract Adjustment ). For the avoidance of doubt, [***]. |
2.10.2 |
Within thirty (30) Days after the Sellers request for a Contract Adjustment, the Buyer and the Sellers shall meet and negotiate in good faith the Contract |
33
Adjustment, it being agreed that each Party will be allowed to present all arguments and matters that it deems necessary in relation to such proposed adjustment (if any). |
2.10.3 | If within sixty (60) Days of Sellers request, the Parties fail to agree on a Contract Adjustment, the matter shall (at the request of either Party) be referred to Arbitration pursuant to Article 19.4. |
2.10.4 | Upon the determination of any Contract Adjustment (if applicable) as agreed to by the Parties or as determined (if at all) in the Arbitration, and subject to the provisions of Article 2.9.5, any such adjustment shall apply and come into force and effect as of the date of the Price Control Event subject to the provisions of Article 2.10.5. In the event that either Party believes that the Arbitration award contradicts or is in violation of applicable law, then such Party shall be entitled to forthwith apply to a competent court to request the annulment of the award (including against the enforceability of the award until final judgment is given). |
2.10.5 | For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby clarified that this Article 2.10 is subject to applicable Law, and that any Contract Adjustment pursuant to this Article 2.10 shall not be made in such a manner as shall cause a breach or violation of the applicable Law. |
34
3. | Agreement for Sale and Purchase |
3.1 | Agreement |
Subject to the terms of this Agreement, the Sellers agree to deliver and sell and the Buyer agrees to take and pay for or, if not taken, pay for Gas, in such quantities, at such times and in such manner as shall be provided for in this Agreement.
3.2 | Uses |
The Buyer shall use the Gas purchased under this Agreement solely for consumption by the Buyer and its Affiliates in the Buyers Facilities and will not resell or otherwise transfer it to others, except as detailed in Articles 3.2.1-3.2.2 below:
3.2.1 | Buyer will be entitled in any Year to resell a quantity of Gas not exceeding fifteen percent (15%) of the applicable ACQ to Distribution Network Consumers; |
3.2.2 | Buyer may [***]; |
3.2.3 | If so required pursuant to the terms of article [***]. At the request of the Sellers, the Buyer will provide the Sellers with [***]. |
35
4. | Warranties Covenants and Taxes |
4.1 | Sellers Warranties and Covenants |
4.1.1 | Without prejudice to any obligation of the Sellers under this Agreement, each of the Sellers (as to its Sellers Percentage) warrants and represents to the Buyer as of the Effective Date, as follows: |
(a) | Title to all Specification Gas sold and delivered by such Seller under this Agreement shall, upon delivery, be free from all liens, charges, encumbrances and adverse interests of any and every kind arising by, through or under such Seller; |
(b) | It is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its formation and it has the legal right, power and authority to conduct its business and execute and deliver this Agreement and observe and perform its obligations under this Agreement; |
(c) | The entry by it into and performance of this Agreement is within its power and has been duly authorized by all necessary action on its part and shall not breach any law or determination or provision applicable to its governing documents; |
(d) | This Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding act and obligation enforceable against such Seller in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; |
(e) | The execution, delivery, and performance by such Seller of this Agreement and the consummation of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement do not and will not (with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both): (i) conflict with the charter documents of such Seller, (ii) violate any provision of any law, rule, or regulation applicable to such Seller, (iii) violate any order, judgment, or decree applicable to such Seller, or (iv) conflict with, or result in a breach or default under, any agreement or other instrument to which such Seller is a party or by which it may be bound; |
36
(f) | There is no claim filed, action, lawsuit, arbitration, proceeding, or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of such Seller, threatened against such Seller which might bring into question the validity of this Agreement or the consummation of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement; and |
(g) |
The Seller nor any director, officer, employee or subsidiary company of such Seller has not made, offered, or authorized and will not make, offer, or authorize with respect to the matters which are the subject of this Agreement, any payment, gift, promise or other advantage, whether directly or through any other person or entity, to or for the use or benefit of any public official (i.e. any person holding a legislative, administrative or judicial office, including any person employed by or acting on behalf of a public agency, a public enterprise or a public international organization) or any political party or political party official or candidate for office, where such payment, gift, promise or advantage would violate (i) the applicable laws of Israel or the United States of America (including, without limitation, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, U.S.C. §78dd-1, et seq.); (ii) the principles described in the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, signed in Paris on December 17, 1997, which entered into force on February 15, 1999, and the Conventions Commentaries; or (iii) the principles described in the United Nations Convention Against Corruption, which entered into force on December 14, 2005. Each Seller shall defend, indemnify and hold the other Parties harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, penalties, costs and expenses arising from or related to, any breach by such Seller of such warranty. Such indemnity obligation shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. For the purposes of the above warranty, each Seller shall in good time (i) respond in reasonable detail to any notice from any other Party reasonably connected with the above-stated warranty; (ii) furnish applicable documentary support for such response upon request from such other |
37
Party; (iii) maintain adequate internal controls, properly record and report all transactions; and (iv) comply with the laws applicable to it. Each Seller acknowledges and confirms that: (i) each Party must rely on the other Parties system of internal controls, and on the adequacy of full disclosure of the facts, and of financial and other data regarding action undertaken under this Agreement; (ii) No Party is in any way authorized to take any action on behalf of another Party that would result in an inadequate or inaccurate recording and reporting of assets, liabilities or any other transaction, or which would put such Party in violation of its obligations under the laws applicable to the operations under this Agreement. |
4.1.2 | Each of the Sellers (as to its Sellers Percentage) covenants with the Buyer to use reasonable endeavors to obtain and maintain all licenses, permits, consents and approvals required from time to time during the Contract Period to permit the performance of its obligations hereunder. |
4.2 | Buyers Warranties and Covenants |
4.2.1 | The Buyer warrants and represents to the Sellers as of the Effective Date, as follows: |
(a) | It has the right for the whole of the Contract Period to purchase Specification Gas from the Sellers in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; and |
(b) | It is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its formation and it has the legal right, power and authority to conduct its business and execute and deliver this Agreement and observe and perform its obligations under this Agreement; |
(c) | Its entry into and performance of this Agreement is within its power and has been duly authorized by all necessary action on its part and shall not breach any law or determination or provision applicable to its governing documents; |
38
(d) | This Agreement constitutes a legal, valid and binding act and obligation enforceable against it in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; |
(e) | The execution, delivery, and performance by Buyer of this Agreement and the consummation of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement do not and will not (with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both): (i) conflict with the charter documents of Buyer, (ii) violate any provision of any law, rule, or regulation applicable to Buyer, (iii) violate any order, judgment, or decree applicable to Buyer, or (iv) conflict with, or result in a breach or default under, any agreement or other instrument to which Buyer is a party or by which it may be bound; |
(f) | There is no claim filed, action, lawsuit, arbitration, proceeding, or investigation pending or, to the knowledge of Buyer, threatened against Buyer which might bring into question the validity or propriety of this Agreement or the consummation of the transaction contemplated by this Agreement; and |
(g) |
Neither Buyer nor any director, officer, employee or subsidiary of the Buyer has made, offered, or authorized and will not make, offer, or authorize with respect to the matters which are the subject of this Agreement, any payment, gift, promise or other advantage, whether directly or through any other person or entity, to or for the use or benefit of any public official (i.e. any person holding a legislative, administrative or judicial office, including any person employed by or acting on behalf of a public agency, a public enterprise or a public international organization) or any political party or political party official or candidate for office, where such payment, gift, promise or advantage would violate (i) the applicable laws of Israel or the United States of America (including, without limitation, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended, U.S.C. §78dd-1, et seq.); (ii) the principles described in the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, signed in Paris on December 17, 1997, which entered into force on February 15, 1999, and the Conventions Commentaries; or (iii) the principles described in the |
39
United Nations Convention Against Corruption, which entered into force on December 14, 2005. The Buyer shall defend, indemnify and hold the other Parties harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses, penalties, costs and expenses arising from or related to, any breach by the Buyer of such warranty. Such indemnity obligation shall survive termination or expiration of this Agreement. For the purposes of the above warranty, the Buyer shall in good time (i) respond in reasonable detail to any notice from any other Party reasonably connected with the above-stated warranty; (ii) furnish applicable documentary support for such response upon request from such other Party; (iii) maintain adequate internal controls, properly record and report all transactions; and (iv) comply with the laws applicable to it. Buyer acknowledges and confirms that: (i) each Party must rely on the other Parties system of internal controls, and on the adequacy of full disclosure of the facts, and of financial and other data regarding action undertaken under this Agreement; (ii) No Party is in any way authorized to take any action on behalf of another Party that would result in an inadequate or inaccurate recording and reporting of assets, liabilities or any other transaction, or which would put such Party in violation of its obligations under the laws applicable to the operations under this Agreement. |
4.2.2 | The Buyer covenants with the Sellers that throughout the Contract Period, the Buyer shall: |
(a) | Not agree to or (to the extent that it is within its power to prevent) permit any amendment or modification of the GTA whereby the Buyers ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement may be prevented or materially adversely affected and shall observe and perform all terms thereof and exercise its rights thereunder in such manner as to secure that the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be performed; and |
(b) | Use reasonable endeavors to obtain and maintain all licenses, permits, consents and approvals required from time to time during the Contract Period to permit the performance of the Buyers obligations hereunder. |
40
4.3 | Taxes and Royalties |
4.3.1 | Each of the Sellers as to its Sellers Percentage shall pay or cause to be paid all royalties, taxes, duties, levies and other sums arising in respect of production, transportation, gathering, processing and handling of Natural Gas before delivery by such Seller to the Buyer at the Delivery Point. |
4.3.2 | The Buyer shall pay or cause to be paid all taxes, duties, levies and other sums arising in respect of receipt, processing, handling and transportation of Natural Gas at or after delivery to the Buyer by each of the Sellers at the Delivery Point. |
4.3.3 | Notwithstanding the above, the Buyer shall also bear and pay or (as the case may be) promptly reimburse each of the Sellers in respect of any: |
(a) | Value Added Tax payable pursuant to Israeli Law in relation to Gas sold by such Seller to the Buyer under this Agreement; |
(b) | Excise Duty payable pursuant to the Excise Law on Fuels-1958 and Purchase Tax payable pursuant to the Purchase Tax Law-1952 as applicable, and any other similar law, in relation to Gas sold by such Seller to the Buyer under this Agreement; and |
(c) | In the event any new taxes are levied by the authorities in Israel after the date hereof on any of the Sellers in respect of production, transportation, gathering, processing and handling of Natural Gas before delivery by the Sellers to the Buyer at the Delivery Point ( New Taxes ), the Sellers may increase the Contract Price by up to [***] in each [***] year period to reflect the financial impact of such New Taxes. If such New Taxes are in excess of [***] of the Contract Price in each [***] year period and the Sellers do not wish to bear the New Taxes in excess of [***] of the Contract Price, the Sellers shall so notify the Buyer and if within thirty (30) days of such notice the Parties have not reached an agreement with respect to a price adjustment above [***], then either Party shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement by ninety (90) Day written notice to the other. |
41
4.4 | Indemnities and Acknowledgements |
4.4.1 | Each of the Sellers as to its Sellers Percentage shall indemnify and hold harmless the Buyer against any and all loss, damage and expense of every kind on account of: |
(a) | adverse claims relating to such Sellers title to any or all Gas delivered to the Buyer hereunder; or |
(b) | any and all royalties, taxes, duties, levies or other sums which the Sellers are obligated to bear and pay pursuant to Article 4.3.1 above. |
4.4.2 | The Buyer shall indemnify and hold harmless each of the Sellers as to its Sellers Percentage against any and all loss, damage and expense of every kind on account of any and all taxes, duties, levies and other sums which the Buyer is obligated to bear and pay pursuant to Articles 4.3.2-4.3.3 above. |
4.4.3 | Any indemnification payment due from one Party to the other under this Article 4.4, shall be included in the Monthly Statement, unless due to its nature it cannot be so included, in which case, the indemnification payment shall be made within thirty (30) Days of the request of the Party entitled to be indemnified. |
42
5. | Sellers Rights, Commingling and Unitization |
5.1 | Sellers Rights |
Without relieving Sellers from any of their specific obligations pursuant to this Agreement (including with respect to quantity, quality and pressure as provided in this Agreement), the Sellers shall have the right to:
5.1.1 | Determine the manner in which they conduct their physical operations; |
5.1.2 | Supply Specification Gas for delivery under this Agreement from any source at their sole discretion, including from outside Israel; |
5.1.3 | Commingle Natural Gas produced pursuant to the Sellers Petroleum Rights with Natural Gas produced from any other source or sources subject specifically to the pressure and quality requirements provided in this Agreement; |
5.1.4 | Pool, combine or unitize all or any part of the Sellers Interest with interests in any other licenses or leases; and |
5.1.5 | Enter into agreements to supply third parties with Natural Gas from any of its licenses and leases, (including from the Sellers Petroleum Rights), or elsewhere. |
43
6. | Quantities and Nominations |
6.1 | The ACQ |
For each Contract Year the Annual Contract Quantity (or ACQ ) shall be equal to the aggregate of the respective DCQs applicable on each Day during that Contract Year.
6.2 | The DCQ |
Except as otherwise provided for in this Agreement, the Daily Contract Quantity or DCQ shall be as follows:
6.2.1 | In respect of each Day of the Commissioning Period, the DCQ shall be zero (0). |
6.2.2 | In respect of each Day of the period commencing on the Commencement Date and ending on the last Day of the First Period, the DCQ shall be [***] MMBTU. |
6.2.3 | In respect of each Day of the Second Period (if applicable), the DCQ shall be reduced in accordance with Article 2.8. |
6.2.4 | The Buyer [***]. |
6.3 | Deliveries |
6.3.1 | In respect of each Day during the Commissioning Period, the Sellers shall use reasonable endeavors to make available for delivery at the Delivery Point the quantities of Specification Gas nominated by the Buyer up to the DCQ specified in Article 6.2.2, in accordance with the provisions of Article 2.4. |
6.3.2 |
In respect of each Day as of the Commencement Date and until the end of the Contract Period, the Sellers shall make available for delivery at the Delivery |
44
Point the quantities of Specification Gas Properly Nominated for delivery by the Buyer and the Buyer shall take delivery of the quantities so delivered. The Sellers will use reasonable endeavors to deliver the Properly Nominated quantities evenly over the Day, such that the quantity delivered in each Hour shall be equal to the Properly Nominated quantity for such Day divided by twenty four (24). |
6.3.3 | Notwithstanding the aforementioned, in the event that any governmental body having authority in relation to the supply of Gas under this Agreement, issues, imposes, or enacts any decree, ruling, declaration, regulation, order, directive, instruction or other legally binding instrument (collectively: Allocation Order ) which affects the sale or delivery of Gas by the Sellers to the Buyer under this Agreement, then in such circumstances the Sellers obligations and undertakings pursuant to this Agreement will be subject to such Allocation Order and the Sellers shall have no liability to the Buyer for complying with such Allocation Order. |
6.4 | Operational Delivery Tolerance |
The Parties agree that the following operational tolerance will apply in respect of deliveries that fall short of, or exceed, the quantity Properly Nominated on any Day by up to [***] ( Daily Delivery Tolerance ) but not more than [***], so that if an under-delivery does not exceed the Daily Delivery Tolerance it shall be deemed to have been caused by Force Majeure; and if an over-delivery does not exceed the Daily Delivery Tolerance the Buyer shall be deemed to have Properly Nominated it. [***].
6.5 | Nomination Procedures |
6.5.1 | Not later than 14:30 hours on the Wednesday immediately preceding the beginning of each Month, the Buyer shall give notice to the Sellers of the quantity of Specification Gas it then forecasts to be required in respect of each Day of that Month. This forecast is indicative and non-binding. |
45
6.5.2 | Not later than 14:30 hours on the Wednesday immediately preceding each Week, the Buyer shall give notice to the Sellers of the quantity of Specification Gas it then forecasts to be required in respect of each Day of that Week. This forecast is indicative and non-binding. |
6.5.3 | Not later than 14:30 hours on each Day, the Buyer shall give notice to the Sellers nominating the quantity of Specification Gas it requires to be delivered at the Delivery Point in respect of the immediately following Day. This nomination will be binding and final, subject to variations in accordance with Articles 6.5.4 and 6.5.5. |
6.5.4 | The Buyer shall be entitled by notice to the Sellers once for any Day to vary the quantities of Specification Gas so nominated pursuant to Article 6.5.3 for any such Day by the following amounts, subject to the following notice periods: |
(a) | Buyer shall be entitled to increase the quantity of Specification Gas nominated for such Day by not more than [***], provided that such notice is given not less than [***] Hours before the Hour from which the variation is to commence; and |
(b) | Buyer shall be entitled to decrease by the quantity of Specification Gas nominated for such Day by not more than [***] provided that such notice is given not less than [***] Hours before the Hour from which the variation is to commence, |
and provided in each case that any such variation complies with Article 6.6.
6.5.5 | The Buyer may at any time request variations in the Proper Nomination at a shorter notice than prescribed in Article 6.5.4, provided such variation complies with Article 6.6.2 and the Sellers shall use reasonable endeavors to comply with the variation so requested, it being specifically agreed that the Sellers failure to comply with the variation so requested shall not constitute Shortfall Gas. |
46
6.5.6 | In the event that the Buyer does not make a Proper Nomination in respect of any Day pursuant to this Article 6.5, the Buyer shall be deemed to have nominated a quantity equal to the quantity Properly Nominated in the preceding Day. |
6.5.7 | If, during any Day a Force Majeure event occurs which results in the Sellers or Buyer being unable to make available for delivery or take Gas in accordance with a Proper Nomination, then until the cessation of the Force Majeure: |
(a) | Until the expiration of the period covered by a Proper Nomination that was made prior to the occurrence of the Force Majeure event, such Proper Nomination shall be in effect; and |
(b) | Thereafter, during the continuation of the Force Majeure event, the Proper Nomination with respect to each Day shall be deemed to be a quantity equal to the applicable DCQ. |
6.5.8 | Notwithstanding the above, in the event that nomination procedures are imposed on the Parties by the Transporter which are inconsistent with the nomination procedures specified in this Article 6.5, the Parties shall revise the nomination procedures set out in this Article 6.5 so as to make them consistent with those imposed by the Transporter provided that the Sellers shall not be required to agree to procedures which are more onerous on the Sellers than the procedures specified in Article 6.5. In default of agreement between the Parties on such revisions, either Party may, by notice to the other, require the matter to be referred for determination by the Expert pursuant to Article 19.3. |
6.5.9 | Without derogating from the provisions of this Article 6.5, during the Interim Period, the following procedures shall apply: |
(a) | the Sellers will use reasonable endeavors to provide Buyer with prior notice of any significant expected reduction of the supply of Gas to the Buyer in accordance with the provisions of Article 2.6.2, and notice of the quantity of Specification Gas the Sellers forecast to be available for delivery to the Buyer during any Month of the Interim Period; |
47
(b) | each Day after receiving the nominations from all the buyers pursuant to the Existing Agreements and Sellers Additional Agreements, the Sellers shall notify the Buyer of any Hours in the immediately following Day in which the aggregate nominations from all the buyers pursuant to the Existing Agreements and Sellers Additional Agreements are expected to exceed the Maximum Hourly Peak Capacity, and if so Sellers shall also inform Buyer of the quantity of Gas that will be available for delivery to the Buyer in the immediately following Day pursuant to the Proper Nominations of the Buyer hereunder; |
6.5.10 | For the avoidance of doubt, the provisions of Article 8.1 shall apply to all forecasts and estimations provided pursuant to this Article 6.5 and shall not derogate from, nor add to, the Parties respective obligations and liabilities to deliver or take quantities of Gas under this Agreement. |
6.6 | Proper Nominations |
6.6.1 | For the purposes of this Agreement, Proper Nomination means a nomination which has been made in accordance with the requirements of Articles 6.5.3, 6.5.4, 6.5.5 or 6.5.7 and Articles 6.6.2 and 6.6.3. Properly Nominated means in relation to a quantity of Gas in respect of any Day, the Proper Nomination. |
6.6.2 | A Proper Nomination made by the Buyer in respect of any Day shall not exceed the DCQ. |
6.6.3 | All nominations or notifications of quantities of Specification Gas under this Agreement shall (except where the context otherwise requires) be made in MMBTU. |
6.6.4 | The Buyer shall take at the Delivery Point the quantities of Specification Gas Properly Nominated by the Buyer and tendered for delivery by the Sellers in respect of such Day. |
6.6.5 | Following the Expansion Date, Buyer may nominate additional volumes above the applicable DCQ and in the event that the Sellers have available uncontracted capacity in Sellers Facilities, Sellers may elect to comply with such nomination of additional volumes on such terms as will be agreed by the Parties. |
48
6.7 | Planned Maintenance |
6.7.1 | When the Sellers are preparing to conduct maintenance, repair, modification, installation of new equipment, or replacement of Sellers Facilities ( Maintenance ) that would require a reduction in the ability to deliver Specification Gas under this Agreement, the Sellers shall use reasonable endeavors to give at least sixty (60) Days prior written notice to the Buyer of the period ( Maintenance Period ) during which they intend to conduct such Maintenance. |
6.7.2 | The Maintenance Period may not exceed [***] consecutive Days in any Year and [***] Days in aggregate in any [***] consecutive Years. It is hereby clarified that in the event that either Party conducts Maintenance for a period that exceeds the Maintenance Period as above, then such excess Maintenance Days shall not constitute as a Maintenance Period under this Agreement. |
6.7.3 | The Maintenance notice shall specify the DCQ that Sellers estimate will be made available to Buyer during the Maintenance Period. |
6.7.4 | Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit or impede Sellers or Buyer from carrying out the Maintenance or from reducing the DCQ for each Day during the Maintenance Period to the levels specified in the notice of Maintenance. The Buyer shall make nominations in respect of any Day during the Maintenance Period by reference to such reduced DCQ. |
49
7. | Facilities |
7.1 | Sellers Facilities |
The Sellers shall throughout the Contract Period, construct, install and maintain the Sellers Facilities in accordance with the standard of a Reasonable and Prudent Operator.
7.2 | Buyers Facilities |
The Buyer shall throughout the Contract Period, construct, install and maintain the Buyers Facilities in accordance with the standard of a Reasonable and Prudent Operator.
50
8. | Exchange of Information |
8.1 | Forecasts |
8.1.1 | The Buyer shall provide to the Sellers, during each Month of September during the Contract Period: (i) a written forecast of the quantities of Specification Gas, which it reasonably expects to nominate during the next succeeding Year; (ii) a written forecast of the quantities of Specification Gas, which it reasonably expects to nominate during each Month of the next succeeding Year; and (iii) a written program of proposed operations for each Month during the following Year, which shall include details of any proposed Maintenance programs in accordance with Article 6.7. |
8.1.2 | During each Month of the Interim Period the Sellers shall [***] pursuant to this Agreement during the next succeeding Month. |
8.1.3 | All information, estimates and forecasts to be provided under this Agreement shall be provided in good faith, but neither Party shall be liable for the accuracy of any estimate or forecast made under this Agreement nor shall any such forecast vary the respective rights and obligations of the Parties hereunder. |
8.1.4 | All information, estimates and forecasts given or work undertaken under this Agreement shall be at the expense of the providing Party. |
8.1.5 | It is agreed that the provisions of this Agreement granting either Party directly or indirectly, rights to receive information, access, visit, monitoring and inspection or to any other source of information, will not grant the receiving Party access to information regarding the competitors of the receiving Party or their mode of operation. |
8.2 | Information and Access |
8.2.1 | It is acknowledged and agreed that nothing in this Article 8 shall oblige either Party to do or omit to do anything which would: |
(a) | breach or otherwise adversely affect any bona fide commitment of confidentiality owed to any Party; or |
(b) | procure or allow any rights of access or inspection in excess of or contrary to such rights as may be legally available to and exercisable by one Party in favor of the other. |
51
8.2.2 | Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 8.3, it is agreed that all information, forecasts and estimates provided pursuant to Article 8 shall be kept confidential by the receiving Party and shall not be disclosed to any Person without the prior written consent of the providing Party. |
8.3 | Confidentiality |
8.3.1 | The terms and conditions of this Agreement and all information disclosed hereunder (including any disclosures made during any Arbitration or Expert Determination) shall until three (3) Years after this Agreement has terminated be treated as confidential. Except as provided in Article 8.3.2, such terms and conditions shall not be disclosed in whole or in part by either Party and such information shall not be disclosed in whole or in part by the Party receiving the same to any other Person without the prior consent of the disclosing Party (such terms and conditions and such information being herein called Disclosed Information ). |
The expression Disclosed Information shall not include any information which (when used or disclosed) has been made public other than through a breach of this Agreement or has been or could have been lawfully acquired (other than pursuant to the provisions of this Article 8.3) by the Party or Person using the same or to whom disclosure is made.
8.3.2 | Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 8.3.1, neither Party shall be required to obtain the prior consent of the other in respect of disclosure of Disclosed Information: |
(a) | to directors or employees of a Party and of Affiliates of such Party, provided that the Buyer or the Sellers (as the case may be) shall use reasonable endeavors to ensure that such Persons keep the Disclosed Information confidential on the same terms as are provided in this Article 8.3; |
52
(b) | to Persons professionally engaged by or on behalf of such Party, provided that such Persons shall be required by such Party to undertake to keep such information confidential and be bound by confidentiality provisions substantially the same as those contained in this Article 8.3; |
(c) | to any government department or any governmental or regulatory agency or body having jurisdiction over such Party, including the anti-trust commissioner, the petroleum commissioner and the securities authority, but only to the extent that such Party is legally compelled to make such disclosure; |
(d) | to any Person to whom such disclosure is required under Israeli electricity regulations, as in force from time to time, including to the System Manager as defined under such electricity regulations and the Public Utilities Authority Electricity, to the extent necessary; |
(e) | to any: (i) lending or other financial institution (including rating agencies); or (ii) to any bona fide intending assignee of the whole or any part of the rights and interests of such Party under this Agreement but only in respect of such proposed assignment and subject to such intending assignee first agreeing with such Party to be bound by confidentiality provisions not less restrictive than those contained in this Article 8.3; |
but (in either case) only to the extent required in connection with obtaining such finance or in respect of such proposed assignment and subject to such institution or intending assignee first agreeing with such Party to be bound by confidentiality provisions substantially the same as those contained in this Article 8.3;
(f) | to the extent required by any applicable laws, rules and regulations of any recognized stock exchange or to the extent required by any lawful subpoena or other process in connection with any judicial, arbitral, or administrative proceeding; |
(g) | to the Transporter, but only to the extent such disclosure is required; |
53
Provided, that in respect of Articles 8.3.2(b) - 8.3.2(g) the disclosing Party: (i) shall keep the disclosure of Disclosed Information limited to the extent reasonably necessary for the purpose for which it is disclosed, (ii) shall wherever practicable and permissible, in advance of such disclosure (or if this is not practicable or permissible as soon as reasonably practicable or permissible thereafter), notify the other of such disclosure (and the extent thereof) and the identity of the Person(s) to whom disclosure was made, and (iii) shall so far as practicable minimize the further disclosure of the Disclosed Information.
8.3.3 | Subject to Article 8.3.2 above, neither the Buyer nor the Sellers shall make any public representations, statements or announcements relating to this Agreement without the prior written approval of the other, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. |
54
9. | Take or Pay |
9.1 | The Adjusted ACQ and Minimum Bill Quantity |
9.1.1 | For each Contract Year, the Adjusted Annual Contract Quantity and the Minimum Bill Quantity shall be calculated in accordance with the following provisions. |
9.1.2 | The Adjusted Annual Contract Quantity (or Adjusted ACQ ) shall be a quantity of Gas equal to the ACQ applicable for the relevant Contract Year less the sum of the following: |
(a) | the aggregate of the quantities of Gas Properly Nominated by the Buyer for delivery during the relevant Contract Year which the Sellers did not for any reason make available for delivery (including without limitation failure to deliver as a result of Force Majeure and Sellers Maintenance Periods) except any quantities that the Sellers did not deliver in the circumstances of Article 11.5.2 and any failure by the Buyer to take delivery of Gas Properly Nominated and tendered for delivery in accordance with this Agreement; |
(b) | the aggregate of the quantities of Gas Properly Nominated by the Buyer for delivery during the relevant Contract Year which the Buyer did not take and was excused from taking due to Off-Spec Gas; and |
(c) |
the aggregate of the quantities of Gas Properly Nominated by the Buyer for delivery during the relevant Contract Year which the Buyer did not take: (i) for reasons for which it was excused from liability under Article 16 (including deemed nominations under Article 6.5.7); (ii) due to [***]. For the purposes of this Article, the Daily quantities of Specification Gas that were Properly Nominated by the Buyer during periods for which it was excused from liability as aforesaid shall be equal to [***]. The Buyer will provide Sellers notice of any |
55
[***] within seven (7) Days of its occurrence and if the Buyer fails to do so it shall not be entitled to any reduction of the ACQ in respect of any quantities of Specification Gas it could not take due to such maintenance or curtailment. |
9.1.3 | The Minimum Bill Quantity (or MBQ ) shall be a quantity of Gas equal to: |
(a) | For all Contract Years during the First Period, [***] of the Adjusted ACQ applicable for each such Contract Year; and |
(b) | For all Contract Years during the Second Period, [***] of the Adjusted ACQ applicable for each such Contract Year. |
9.2 | Carry Forward Aggregate |
9.2.1 | If and to the extent that in any Contract Year the aggregate of the quantities of Gas taken and paid for by the Buyer under this Agreement (excluding any quantity of Gas in respect of which the Buyer shall receive a credit pursuant to Article 9.4) exceeds [***] of the applicable ACQ, then such amount shall be classified as Carry Forward in respect of such Contract Year. |
9.2.2 | Any quantity so classified as Carry Forward in respect of any Contract Year together with any Carry Forward so classified in respect of the [***] previous Contract Years shall (save to the extent of any use thereof pursuant to Article 9.3) be known as the Carry Forward Aggregate in force at any time or from time to time. |
9.3 | Take or Pay |
9.3.1 | In respect of each Contract Year the amount of the Minimum Bill Quantity which has not been taken by the Buyer in such Contract Year under this Agreement shall be known as the Annual Take or Pay Quantity for such Contract Year. |
56
9.3.2 | In respect of any Contract Year for which there arises an Annual Take or Pay Quantity, such quantity shall be reduced by a quantity of Carry Forward Aggregate not exceeding a maximum amount of [***] of the applicable ACQ and: |
(a) | any remaining amount of such Annual Take or Pay Quantity shall be known as the Net Annual TOP Quantity ; and |
(b) | such use of Carry Forward Aggregate shall be deemed to be a recovery of Carry Forward Aggregate by the Buyer to the extent of such use and the outstanding balance (if any) of Carry Forward Aggregate shall be reduced commensurately. |
9.3.3 | In respect of any Contract Year for which there arises a Net Annual TOP Quantity, the Buyer shall make payment to the Sellers at the volume weighted arithmetic average price for the relevant Contract Year for any such Net Annual TOP Quantity. |
9.3.4 | The Net Annual TOP Quantity in respect of such Contract Year together with the Net Annual TOP Quantity in respect of the [***] previous Contract Years not already recovered pursuant to the provisions of Article 9.4 shall be known as Make-Up Aggregate . |
9.4 | Recovery of Make-Up Aggregate |
9.4.1 | The Buyer shall be entitled to recover Make-Up Aggregate without additional cost in accordance with the provisions of this Article 9.4 hereinafter. In relation to each Contract Year, at the commencement of which any Make-Up Aggregate exists, the Buyer shall receive a quantity credit (in MMBTU) in respect of any Gas taken and paid for by the Buyer in excess of the MBQ in the relevant Year up to the balance of the then outstanding Make-Up Aggregate. |
9.4.2 | The quantities to be used in so reducing the Make-Up Aggregate shall be established by applying the first in first out principle to the quantities constituting the Make-Up Aggregate. |
9.4.3 | The quantity credit in respect of any Gas taken and paid for by the Buyer in excess of the MBQ and up to the balance of the then outstanding Make-Up Aggregate mentioned in Article 9.4.1, shall be converted to a monetary credit by multiplying such quantity with the Contract Price in effect at the time Buyer recovered such Make-Up Aggregate. |
57
9.4.4 | The monetary credit calculated in accordance with Article 9.4.3 shall be taken into account in the Annual Reconciliation Statement in respect of such Year. |
9.4.5 | Any such credit to the Buyer shall be deemed to be a recovery of Make-Up Aggregate by the Buyer to the extent of the quantity corresponding to such credit and the outstanding balance (if any) of Make-Up Aggregate shall be reduced commensurately. |
9.4.6 | Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Article 9.4, if at what would otherwise be the end of the Contract Period there is any Make-Up Aggregate outstanding, then, at Sellers option, which will be notified to Buyer by not later than one hundred and twenty (120) Days before the end of the Contract Period: |
(a) | This Agreement shall not terminate on that date but shall continue in full force and effect for a number of Days equal to the Make-Up Aggregate divided by [***] of the DCQ in effect during the last Contract Year or twelve (12) Months, whichever is shorter. During this period, the provisions of this Agreement will continue to apply mutatis mutandis (in order to avoid any doubt, Article 9.3 will not apply); or |
(b) | On the last Day of the month immediately following the month in which such termination occurs the Sellers shall [***]. |
58
9.5 | Assignment of [***] |
9.5.1 | The Buyer may assign: [***], subject to the following provisions: |
(a) | the assignment will only be made with respect to [***]. |
(b) | [***]. |
9.5.2 | It is hereby clarified that the [***] will expire at the end of the [***]. |
59
10. | Price and Price Adjustment |
10.1 | Calculation of Contract Price |
10.1.1 | The Contract Price of Gas delivered pursuant to this Agreement (the Contract Price ) shall be calculated in accordance with this Article 10. |
10.1.2 | The Price Formula |
The Contract Price in New Israeli Shekels (NIS) per MMBTU for each Price Period during the Contract Period shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula:
CP = [***]
Where:
CP is the Contract Price for the applicable Price Period expressed in NIS (New Israeli Shekels) per MMBTU.
BP is the agreed base price of [***] per MMBTU.
PT is the average of the Production Cost Tariff ( Weighted Average Production Price on Table 1-6.3 of the PUA publications) published by the Public Utilities Authority Electricity that is in effect on the last day of the Price Period.
PT0 is [***];
NS means the arithmetic average of the Representative Rate for all the Days of the Price Period;
NS0 is [***] NIS/USD;
Indicator means PT and NS.
10.2 | Prices |
10.2.1 | Gas delivered under the terms of this Agreement shall be paid for at the Contract Price unless specified otherwise in this Agreement. |
60
10.2.2 | The Contract Price will include all the amounts due to the Sellers for delivery of the Gas and providing the associated services as described in this Agreement, including the price of the energy content of the Gas, fees for capacity, processing, treatment, transportation, pressure reduction and measurement of the Gas prior to its delivery at the Delivery Point, and for the nomination procedures described in Article 6.5. |
10.2.3 | Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 10.1 above, the Contract Price in US Dollars calculated based on the Representative Rate as at the date of the Monthly Statement shall not be less than five U.S. Dollars and twenty Cents (US$5.20) per MMBTU (the Floor Price ) provided however that: |
(a) | If at any time during the Contract Period the Contract Price calculated in accordance with Article 10.1.3 is less than five U.S. Dollars and twenty Cents (US$5.20) for a period of six (6) consecutive Months, then the Floor Price immediately following such six month period shall be reduced to five U.S. Dollars (US$5.00); and |
(b) | If at any time following: (i) the reduction of the Floor Price under Article 10.2.3(a); or (ii) the increase of the Floor Price under Article 10.2.3(c); the Contract Price calculated in accordance with the formula described in Article 10.1.3 is less than five U.S. Dollars (US$5.00) for a period of six (6) consecutive Months, then the Floor Price immediately following such six (6) month period shall be reduced to four U.S. Dollars and seventy Cents (US$4.70). |
(c) | If at any time following the reduction of the Floor Price under Article 10.2.3(b) the Contract Price calculated in accordance with the formula described in Article 10.1.3 is equal to or more than five U.S. Dollars (US$5.00) for a period of six (6) consecutive Months, then the Floor Price immediately following such six (6) month period shall be increased to five U.S. Dollars (US$5.00); and |
(d) |
If at any time following: (i) the reduction of the Floor Price under Article 10.2.3(a); or (ii) the increase of the Floor Price under Article 10.2.3(c); the Contract Price calculated in accordance with the formula described in |
61
Article 10.1.3 is equal to or more than five U.S. Dollars and twenty Cents (US$5.20) for a period of six (6) consecutive Months, then the Floor Price immediately following such six (6) Months period shall be increased to five U.S. Dollars and twenty Cents (US$5.20). |
(e) | The calculation of the Floor Prices as above will be based on the Representative Rate as at the date of the Monthly Statement for the relevant Price Period. |
10.2.4 | Gas delivered in reduction of the Shortfall Aggregate under the provisions of Article 17 shall be paid for at the following prices: |
(a) | Gas delivered in reduction of the First Shortfall Aggregate under the provisions of Article 17.2.2 shall be paid for at a price (herein called the First Shortfall Price ) that is equal to: (i) during the period prior to [***]; (ii) during the period following the [***]; (iii) during the [***]; and (iv) during the period following the [***]. |
(b) | Gas delivered in reduction of the Second Shortfall Aggregate under the provisions of Article 17.2.2 shall be paid for at a price (herein called the Second Shortfall Price ) that is equal to: (i) during the period prior to the first (1 st ) anniversary of the Availability Date- ninety percent (90%) of the Contract Price; (ii) during the period following the first (1 st ) anniversary of the Availability Date until the Interim Period Commencement Date- seventy five percent (75%) of the Contract Price; (iii) during the Interim Period- ninety percent (90%) of the Contract Price; and (iv) during the period following the Interim Period End Date - seventy five percent (75%) of the Contract Price. |
62
10.3 | Figures for Calculation of Indicator |
10.3.1 | All intermediate calculations to ascertain the Contract Price under this Agreement shall be made to five (5) places of decimals, without rounding and the final product shall then be rounded to the fourth decimal. A figure of five (5) (or more) in the fifth place of decimals shall cause a rounding up of the fourth decimal. |
10.3.2 | All prices calculated in accordance with this Article 10 are exclusive of all taxes and duties, and shall be payable in accordance with Article 11. |
10.3.3 | In the application of the formula set out in Article 10.1, the latest figures for the relevant period needed to calculate an Indicator which are available on the first Day of each Price Period shall be used (whether the same are published in final or in provisional form) and the values so obtained shall not be adjusted consequent upon such figures being subsequently published in amended form except only: |
(a) | in those specified circumstances and in the manner set out in Articles 10.4 and 10.5; or |
(b) | in the event that figures which are then published in provisional form are subsequently published in final form within two (2) Months after such quoted price is first quoted. |
10.4 | Unavailability or Change in Basis of or Error in Indicator |
10.4.1 | If during any Price Period in the opinion of either Party: |
(a) | the Indicator is permanently not available (or the Parties are unable to agree whether it is only temporarily unavailable); |
(b) | the Indicator contains an error in any of the relevant figures required to calculate such Indicator; or |
(c) | the basis of calculation of the Indicator is so changed as to affect materially the validity of price comparison or index comparison over time; |
then either Party may, not later than the end of the relevant Price Period, give notice to the other of such opinion and the Parties shall jointly endeavor to agree upon whether such opinion is valid and if so to agree upon an appropriate amendment to or replacement of such Indicator (or any such figure).
63
10.4.2 | To the extent that the Parties have been able to agree upon an amended or replacement of the relevant Indicator (or figure), it shall be used in the calculation of the Contract Price for the relevant Price Period and subsequent Price Periods and shall not subsequently be amended in respect of the Price Periods for which it is used, even though the relevant Indicator (or figure) subsequently becomes available or is corrected. |
10.4.3 | If the Parties are unable to agree whether the Indicator (or figure) is unavailable, is erroneous or has been changed, within ninety (90) days from the date of the notice given under Article 10.4.1, the matter shall (at the request of either Party) be referred to Arbitration pursuant to Article 19.4. |
10.4.4 | In any Arbitration pursuant to Article 10.4: |
(a) | If the issue referred to Arbitration is the establishment of an appropriate replacement of the Indicator pursuant to Article 10.4.1(a), the Arbitrator(s) shall determine a replacement Indicator (being an index price or series of prices or combination of indices as close as possible in type and use to the Indicator required to be replaced, with such adjustments only thereto as may be necessary to reflect more closely the movements of such Indicator) and shall in the same manner (if required) provide an appropriate value to be used as a substitute Indicator. |
(b) | If it is agreed or determined that the circumstances set out in Article 10.4.1(b) have occurred, the Arbitrator(s) shall provide a determination to correct the error including a substitute Indicator, if applicable. |
(c) | If it is agreed or determined that the circumstances set out in Article 10.4.1(c) have occurred, the Arbitrator(s) shall determine such adjustments to be made to the Indicator (and if appropriate its substitute Indicator) as may be required to restore the validity of price or index comparison over time or, if this is not possible, the Arbitrator(s) may determine an alternative Indicator together with an appropriate value to be used as its denominator in the manner described in Article 10.4.4(a). |
64
(d) | If it is determined by the Arbitrator(s) that the Indicator is only temporarily unavailable as described in Article 10.4.1(a), then Article 10.5 shall apply, if it is determined that the Indicator has not been computed in error or has not materially changed as described in Articles 10.4.1(b) and 10.4.1(c), then the Contract Price for the Price Period in respect of which the reference to the Arbitration has been made shall be calculated in accordance with Article 10.1.3 as if no reference to the Arbitration had been made whereupon no subsequent reference to the Arbitration under Article 10.4 may be made in respect of such Price Period by such Party. |
10.4.5 | If for any of the reasons specified in Article 10.4 the Contract Price cannot be calculated when required, then a Provisional Contract Price shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Article 10.5. |
10.4.6 | It is agreed that a change of name of the Indicator shall not in itself be taken to be a reason for reference to Arbitration as a Dispute under this Article 10.4. |
10.5 | Provisional Contract Price |
10.5.1 | If due to the unavailability of information, Sellers are unable to calculate the Indicator under Article 10.3 or if the Buyer has notified the Sellers in writing that it does not agree with the Sellers calculation of the Contract Price within fourteen (14) Days of receipt of the Sellers calculation pursuant to Article 10.1.3, then: |
(a) | a price (herein referred to as the Provisional Contract Price ) shall be calculated as provided in Article 10.5.2; and |
(b) | if for any reason the Provisional Contract Price cannot be calculated as mentioned in Article 10.5.1(a), then the Contract Price for the immediately preceding Price Period shall be used as the Provisional Contract Price for the current Price Period; |
and until the Contract Price can be calculated and subject to retrospective adjustment as hereinafter provided, the Provisional Contract Price for such Price Period shall be deemed to be the Contract Price for such Price Period for all purposes of this Agreement.
65
10.5.2 | The Provisional Contract Price shall be calculated in the same manner as the Contract Price pursuant to this Article 10, but using in respect of any figure used to calculate an Indicator for use in the said formula which is not available or is the subject of dispute under this Article 10, the latest undisputed figure from the specified publication or same authority which was available prior to the disputed figure. |
10.5.3 | Once the Indicator and figures required to calculate the Contract Price for any Price Period have all become available and any dispute in respect thereof has been finally settled, the Contract Price shall be calculated for such Price Period and shall take effect retrospectively from the commencement of such Price Period and any overpayment or underpayment hereunder made due to the application of the Provisional Contract Price shall be shown in the next Monthly Statement following calculation of the Contract Price and shall be paid or credited with interest calculated at the rate of [***] from the date of any overpayment or underpayment to the date of credit or payment (as applicable) applying the agreed or determined Contract Price for such Price Period. |
66
11. | Billing and Payment |
11.1 | Monthly Statements |
11.1.1 | Not later than the tenth (10 th ) of each Month from the Commencement Date, the Sellers shall render to the Buyer a statement ( Monthly Statement ) which shall show for the preceding Month, inter alia, the information specified in Article 11.1.2. |
11.1.2 | The information referred to in Article 11.1.1 is: |
(a) | The Contract Price applicable to that Month; |
(b) | In each Day of that Month: the quantity of Gas expressed in MMBTU (calculated in accordance with its Higher Heating Value) delivered to the Buyer at the Delivery Point and the Proper Nomination for such Day; |
(c) | Any reductions to the ACQ which are to be made in respect of any Day or Days in that Month (showing the reasons for such reductions); |
(d) | The balance of any First Shortfall Aggregate and Second Shortfall Aggregate outstanding at the end of that Month; |
(e) | Any sum due and owing to the Buyer under the provisions of Article 12 at the end of that Month; |
(f) | The sum due and owing to the Sellers (obtained in accordance with all relevant provisions of this Agreement) in respect of Gas delivered hereunder at the Delivery Point during that Month showing the respective apportionment (if applicable) of such sum at the respective prices applicable pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; |
(g) | Any other sum or sums due and owing at the end of that Month from either Party to the other under this Agreement; |
(h) | The net sums payable by the Buyer to each of the Sellers or by each of the Sellers to the Buyer after taking account of all the foregoing matters set out in this Article 11.1; |
(i) |
The applicable taxes including Value Added Tax and Excise Tax, if any, that are billable to Buyer or Sellers (as applicable) pursuant to applicable |
67
legislation or to this Agreement. Value Added Tax and Excise Tax (if any) will be expressed and paid by the Buyer to the Sellers in Israeli currency calculated in accordance with the Representative Rate known on the date of the tax invoice; and |
(j) | Any other items reasonably requested by the Buyer and approved by Sellers, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. |
11.2 | Annual Reconciliation Statements |
11.2.1 | As soon as practicable after each Year but no more than ninety (90) Days after the end of the Year, the Sellers shall render to the Buyer a statement (herein called the Annual Reconciliation Statement ) which shall show for the preceding Year ( inter alia ) the information specified in Article 11.2.2. |
11.2.2 | The information referred to in Article 11.2.1 is: |
(a) | The total quantity of Gas Properly Nominated by the Buyer in that Year and the total quantity of Gas expressed in MMBTU delivered hereunder to the Delivery Point in that Year; |
(b) | The Adjusted ACQ for that Year showing in detail the reductions made from the ACQ in conformity with the terms of this Agreement to arrive at the Adjusted ACQ; |
(c) | The quantities of Gas for which the Buyer should have paid at the prices prescribed therefore and the quantities for which it has in fact paid at such prices; |
(d) | The balance of Make-Up Aggregate remaining at the end of that Year; |
(e) | The balance of Carry Forward Aggregate remaining at the end of that Year; |
(f) | The Minimum Bill Quantity, the Annual Take or Pay Quantity and the Net Annual TOP Quantity for that Year (if any); |
(g) | All and any sums due and owing from either Party to the other in respect of that Year or any previous Year; |
68
(h) | The net sums (if any) payable by the Buyer to each of the Sellers or by each of the Sellers to the Buyer as at the end of that Year after taking account of all the foregoing matters set out in this Article 11.2.2; |
(i) | The applicable taxes including Value Added Tax and Excise Tax, if any, that are billable to Buyer or Sellers (as applicable) pursuant to applicable legislation or to this Agreement. Value Added Tax and Excise Tax (if any) will be expressed and paid in Israeli currency calculated in accordance with the Representative Rate known on the date of the tax invoice; |
(j) | Any amounts due to the Buyer for reimbursement of payments for Off-Spec Gas pursuant to Article 12.2; and |
(k) | Any other items reasonably requested by the Buyer and approved by Sellers, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. |
11.2.3 | If the Sellers have not rendered such Annual Reconciliation Statement within ninety (90) Days from the end of the relevant Year, then the Buyer shall be entitled to do so within thirty (30) Days thereafter. |
11.3 | Payment Dates |
11.3.1 | By the later of thirty (30) Days after the end of each Month or twenty (20) Days after the Buyer has received the Sellers Monthly Statement for the preceding Month, the Buyer shall pay to each of the Sellers, or each of the Sellers shall pay to the Buyer (as the case may be), in funds available to the recipient on the day of payment, the sum set out in such Monthly Statement. |
11.3.2 | Within thirty (30) Business Days following the receipt of the Annual Reconciliation Statement, the Buyer shall pay to each of the Sellers or each of the Sellers shall pay to the Buyer (as the case may be), in funds available to the recipient on the day of payment, the sum (if any) set out therein for the preceding Year. |
11.4 | Payments |
11.4.1 |
Payments under this Agreement shall be made in US Dollars calculated on the Representative Rate known on the date of issuance of the Monthly Statement |
69
by direct bank transfer or equivalent instantaneous transfer of funds to each of the Sellers or Buyer (as applicable) at such place in the U.S., Europe or Israel as the recipient may request or such other place as may be agreed (such agreement not to be unreasonably withheld). |
11.4.2 | In the event any Seller requests that any payments to be made by the Buyer to such Seller hereunder be made in Israeli currency it shall submit its invoice in Israeli currency and Buyer shall comply with such request and make such payment in Israeli currency. |
11.4.3 | If the due date as specified above is not a Business Day, then the due date shall be deferred to the next Business Day. |
11.4.4 | Subject to the timely provision to the paying Party (which for the purposes of this Article will include the Buyer or each of the Sellers, as applicable) of appropriate withholding tax exemptions approvals, all payments made under this Agreement shall be made without withholding or deduction for, or on account of any taxes, duties, assessments or governmental charges of any nature imposed or levied by or on behalf of any authority having power to tax, unless such withholding or deduction is required by law. For the removal of doubt it is clarified that if such appropriate withholding tax exemptions approvals are not provided, the Buyer or the Sellers (as applicable) may withhold from payments due to the other Party, amounts as required by applicable law. |
11.4.5 | In the event that any payments due to be paid by a Party hereunder are subject to Value Added Tax under Israeli law, such Value Added Tax will be paid by such Party to the other Party in accordance with Article 11.3 at the prevailing legal rate, against procurement of a tax invoice ( heshbonit mas) as required by Israeli law. |
11.4.6 | Any other tax or payment which is to be borne or paid by either Party in accordance with Article 4.3 above, shall be paid by the relevant Party on the date for payment of Monthly Statements in which such tax or payment was included or by not later than three (3) Business Days prior to the date on which such amount is to be transferred to the tax authorities pursuant to the applicable law, whichever is earlier. |
70
11.5 | Failure to Pay |
11.5.1 | Should either the Buyer or any of the Sellers fail to make payment to the other of any sum due hereunder, interest thereon shall accrue at the rate per annum equal to [***] from the date when such payment is due hereunder until the same is made, except with respect to amounts [***]. |
11.5.2 | In the event of failure to pay any amount when due pursuant to this Agreement, then the Party to whom such sum is due and owing may on seven (7) Business Days written notice to the other Party of the intention so to do, suspend delivery or receipt, as the case may be, of Specification Gas hereunder except if the [***]. If such failure to pay continues for fourteen (14) Days from the applicable due date, the Party to whom the sum is due and owing may also, on ninety (90) Days written notice to the other Party, terminate this Agreement except if the [***]. The exercise of such rights shall not constitute a waiver of, nor in any way, prejudice other remedies available to the Party to whom such sum is due and owing. |
11.6 | Disputed Amounts |
11.6.1 |
In the event that the Buyer disputes any sum set out in any Monthly Statement or any Annual Reconciliation Statement or the Sellers dispute any sum set out in any Annual Reconciliation Statement prepared by the Buyer in accordance with Article 11.2.3 (including, for the avoidance of doubt, any amount either Party wishes to set off from any amounts due to the other), the Party [***] |
71
hereto, and shall concurrently give written notice to the other Party of the nature and extent of such dispute. |
11.6.2 | Within fourteen (14) Days after such payment due date, the Parties shall meet to seek to resolve such dispute, but if within thirty (30) Days after such payment due date the Parties have not resolved such dispute, then either Party may refer such dispute to Arbitration in accordance with Article 19.4. |
11.6.3 | Within seven (7) Business Days after such dispute is resolved or determined, the corresponding payment or repayment (as the case may be) due from one Party to the other shall be made together with interest at the rate set out in Article 11.5 from the applicable due date to the date of such payment or repayment. |
11.7 | Examination |
The Parties shall each have the right, upon reasonable notice and at reasonable hours, to examine the books, records and charts of the other Party relevant to this Agreement to the extent necessary to verify the accuracy of any accounting statement, charge, calculation, determination or claim made pursuant to any of the provisions of this Agreement subject to the following:
11.7.1 | Such books, records and charts need not be preserved longer than a period of twelve (12) Months after the end of the Year to which such books records or charts refer unless they relate to an outstanding bona fide dispute. |
11.7.2 | If any such verification involves the examination of confidential documents not solely relating to the sale of Specification Gas hereunder, the requesting Party shall have the right to require the auditors of the other Party to provide a certified extract of the documents excluding such non-relating matters and the costs of preparing such extract shall be borne by the requesting Party unless it is established that there was an error in any such accounting statement, charge calculation, determination or claim in an amount exceeding five percent (5%) of the total amount due in the relevant Monthly Statement in which event the cost thereof shall be borne by the other Party. |
72
11.7.3 | If any such examination reveals any inaccuracy in any invoice or financial statement theretofore rendered, the Party to whom the resulting payment or repayment is due shall within seven (7) Business Days after the date that such inaccuracy is discovered but not later than two (2) Years after the date of the relevant statement or invoice, submit to the other Party a statement showing all necessary adjustments to the former bill or financial statement. Within fourteen (14) Business Days after the amount due is established (by agreement or determination by Arbitration in accordance with Article 19.4) the Party from whom payment is due shall make payment or repayment (in accordance, mutatis mutandis , with the provisions of Articles 11.4 and 11.5 above) of the sum so due. |
11.7.4 | Such right to examine must be exercised within twelve (12) Months after the end of the Year to which the books, records or charts being examined refer. |
73
12. | Quality |
12.1 | Specification |
Natural Gas tendered for delivery under this Agreement shall at the Delivery Point be in accordance with the specification set out in Schedule 8 ( Specification ) and the requirements of the Transporter as in effect on the date hereof. The Parties will use reasonable endeavors to ensure that the requirements of the Transporter are substantially similar to those set out in Schedule 4 and in particular do not exceed the range set out therein for hydrocarbon dewpoint and water dewpoint.
12.2 | Failure to Conform |
12.2.1 | If at any time the Natural Gas tendered for delivery at the Delivery Point is Off-Spec Gas, any Party that becomes aware that such Natural Gas is Off-Spec Gas shall promptly notify the Transporter and the other Party in accordance with Article 12.3. The Buyer shall have the right to accept or reject such Off-Spec Gas subject to the following provisions of this Article 12.2. To the extent the Buyer is notified by the Transporter that Natural Gas tendered for delivery by the Sellers is Off-Spec Gas, the Buyer shall so notify the Sellers, provided that a bona fide failure of the Buyer to issue such notice to the Sellers shall not be deemed to a breach of this Agreement by the Buyer and shall not impose any liability whatsoever on the Buyer. |
12.2.2 | Upon becoming aware that the Natural Gas tendered for delivery at the Delivery Point is Off-Spec Gas, the Sellers shall promptly use all reasonable endeavors to remedy such failure so as to make available Specification Gas. |
12.2.3 | The Buyer may refuse to take all or any part of the Off-Spec Gas until the deficiency has been remedied, but any such refusal shall not constitute a waiver nor affect any other rights or remedies of the Buyer in respect of such failure on the part of the Sellers to tender for delivery Specification Gas. |
74
12.2.4 | If the Buyer takes Off-Spec Gas supplied by the Sellers without being aware that it is Off-Spec Gas, the Sellers sole liability to the Buyer and Buyers sole remedy in respect of such Off-Spec Gas will be to reimburse Buyer for all reasonable costs and expenses that Buyer actually incurs in: |
(a) | mitigating the damage to Buyers Facilities and the Downstream System; and |
(b) | cleaning and clearing required as a direct result of the Off-Spec Gas taken, of the Buyers Facilities and the Downstream System and the repairing of damage to such facilities arising as a direct result of the Off-Spec Gas taken, |
provided however, that the Sellers total liability in any Year for any and all costs and expenses with respect to the circumstances set out in Article 12.2.4, shall be limited to [***].
12.2.5 | If the Buyer takes Off-Spec Gas after becoming aware that it is Off-Spec Gas then the Sellers shall have no liability to the Buyer as a consequence of the Buyer taking such Off-Spec Gas. |
12.3 | Determination |
12.3.1 | Any difference between the Parties, which may arise in respect of the quality of the Natural Gas, shall (at the request of either Party) be referred to Expert Determination in accordance with Article 19.3. |
12.3.2 | Any difference between the Parties, which may arise in respect of any liabilities, costs, claims and expenses incurred under Article 12.2, shall (at the request of either Party) be referred to Arbitration in accordance with Article 19.4. |
75
13. | Delivery Point |
13.1 | Delivery Point |
13.1.1 | Delivery Point means the point at the flange between the Sellers Facilities and the Transporters receiving terminal at any entry point into the Downstream System. |
13.1.2 | Sellers will be responsible for the transportation of the Gas to the Delivery Point. Buyer will be responsible for taking delivery of the Gas at the Delivery Point and for the transportation of the Gas from the Delivery Point to Buyers Facilities, and for any and all costs, tariffs, or levies arising from or applicable to the receipt and transportation of the Gas from the Delivery Point to Buyers Facilities, including without limitation any and all fees and tariffs payable to the Transporter (including any and all fees and tariffs payable to the Transporter relating to any connection fees, measurement fees or any other payments of any kind due to the Transporter in connection with the delivery of Gas hereunder). |
13.1.3 | Specification Gas to be delivered under the terms of this Agreement shall be tendered for delivery by the Sellers to the Buyer at the Delivery Point. |
13.2 | Property and Risk |
Title to Gas and risk of loss of or damage to Gas delivered in accordance with the terms of this Agreement shall pass from the Sellers to the Buyer at the Delivery Point and any liability in respect of such Gas shall also pass at the Delivery Point.
76
14. | Pressure |
14.1 | Delivery Pressure |
14.1.1 | The Delivery Pressure means the pressure of the Gas at the Delivery Point specified by the Transporter as of the Effective Date at a pressure sufficient to allow Natural Gas Properly Nominated by Buyer to enter the Downstream System, but shall not exceed a Gauge maximum pressure of eighty (80) Bar. |
14.1.2 | The Sellers shall tender for delivery Specification Gas at the Delivery Point at the Delivery Pressure. |
14.2 | Determination |
Any difference between the Parties, which may arise in respect of the pressure of the Natural Gas, shall (at the request of either Party) be referred to the Expert for determination in accordance with Article 19.3.
77
15. | Measurement |
15.1 | General |
Buyer and Sellers agree to determine measurement procedures in consultation with the Transporter and application of good oil and gas industry practices.
15.2 | Measurement in Buyers Facilities |
15.2.1 | The Buyer shall at its own cost install, operate and maintain, or cause to be installed, operated and maintained, suitable gas measuring devices, and any other metering devices at the Buyers Facilities required for determining the quantity of the Natural Gas supplied by the Sellers to each of the Buyers Facilities in accordance with the measurement provisions and procedures determined by the Parties in consultation with the Transporter. Such metering station will be located at or near the flange between the Downstream System and the Buyers Facilities. |
15.2.2 | Buyer shall, or if applicable, ensure that the Transporter shall, periodically calibrate, verify such measurement devices, and shall be responsible for operating the measurement devices to continuously measure and record the quantity of Gas and in accordance with the measurement provisions set out in accordance with Article 15.2.1. |
15.2.3 | Buyer shall, or if applicable, ensure that the Transporter shall, provide the Sellers with monthly reports no later than seven (7) Days after the end of the applicable Month that will include the daily measurements which were recorded for the relevant Month. |
15.3 | Disputes |
In the event of any dispute concerning the subject matter of Article 15.2, including but not limited to, disputes over the accuracy of measuring devices, their calibration, the result of a measurement, sampling, analysis, computation or method of calculation, such dispute shall be settled in good faith as mutually agreed between the Parties and in consultation with the Transporter, if appropriate. In the absence of such agreement the dispute shall be submitted to Expert Determination pursuant to Article 19.3.
78
16. | Force Majeure |
16.1 | Definition |
The expression Force Majeure means any event or circumstance that is beyond the reasonable control of the Party claiming Force Majeure (acting and having acted as a Reasonable and Prudent Operator) resulting in or causing the failure of a Party to perform any one or more of its respective obligations under this Agreement, which failure could not have been prevented or overcome by the exercise by such Party of the standard of a Reasonable and Prudent Operator, including without limitation: war (declared or undeclared), military action, acts of terrorism, fire, storm, lightning, earthquakes, subsidence; acts or omissions of the government; breakage, or malfunction of, or accidents to machinery, pipelines or facilities; failure of the Transporter to perform due to a force majeure event under the GTA; failure of gas supply due to well non-performance or failure, inability of Sellers to maintain deliverability, reservoir non-performance, blowouts, or any event which is beyond the Sellers control acting as a Reasonable and Prudent Operator, that causes or results in a material reduction in the quantity or pressure of Gas in Sellers Reservoir and/or following the Interim Period End Date the Yam-Tethys Reservoir. For the avoidance of doubt it is hereby clarified that the following events and circumstances shall not constitute a Force Majeure: changes in market conditions, including changes that directly or indirectly affect the demand for or price of Gas, electricity or any other products manufactured or produced by the Buyer or the Sellers, including inter alia, loss of customers.
16.2 | Payments |
Notwithstanding anything in this Article 16 (and without prejudice to the generality thereof) neither the Buyer nor the Sellers (as the case may be) shall as the result of Force Majeure be relieved from the duty to pay money which is due or from the liability for failing to make such payment when due.
79
16.3 | Nature of Relief |
The Buyer or the Sellers (as the case may be) shall, subject to Article 16.4 and Article 16.5, be relieved from the duty to perform any obligation or undertaking under this Agreement and from any liability resulting from failing to perform such obligation or undertaking, in whole or in part, as follows:
16.3.1 | In the case of the Sellers, to the extent that by reason of Force Majeure, any Seller: |
(a) | fails to deliver the applicable Sellers Percentage of the quantities of Specification Gas Properly Nominated for delivery under this Agreement; |
(b) | fails to perform any of its other obligations under this Agreement, other than obligations to pay money; or |
(c) | is otherwise in breach of any covenant under this Agreement. |
16.3.2 | In the case of the Buyer, to the extent that by reason of Force Majeure, the Buyer: |
(a) | fails to take delivery of Specification Gas Properly Nominated for delivery and properly tendered for delivery under this Agreement; |
(b) | fails to perform any of its other obligations under this Agreement; other than obligations to pay money; or |
(c) | is otherwise in breach of any covenant under this Agreement. |
16.3.3 | In the event that either the Buyer or the Sellers shall exercise their respective rights (pursuant to Article 23.1) to perform any obligations under this Agreement by procuring that such obligations are performed by a third party, then the Buyer or the Sellers (as the case may be) shall only be entitled to be relieved from the duty to perform obligations or undertakings under this Agreement and from any liability resulting from failing to perform such obligation or undertaking, in whole or in part, for reasons of Force Majeure to the extent that they acted as a Reasonable and Prudent Operator in appointing such third party and such third party would have been so entitled to such relief if such third party had been the Buyer or the Sellers (as the case may be) under this Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, any Force Majeure event relating to the Yam-Tethys Facilities, shall constitute a Force Majeure event under this Agreement provided that the occurrence in relation to the Yam-Tethys Facilities would have entitled the Yam-Tethys Partners to such relief if the Yam-Tethys Partners had been the Sellers under this Agreement. |
80
16.4 | Notice and Reports |
As soon as reasonably possible and in no event later than seven (7) Business Days after the occurrence of a Force Majeure event, the Party claiming relief shall notify the other Parties in writing of the occurrence of such Force Majeure event. This notification shall include reasonable details regarding the nature and consequences of the Force Majeure event. Relief under Article 16.3 shall be effective from the beginning of the Force Majeure event. The Party claiming Force Majeure shall keep the other Parties reasonably informed regarding the steps that it is taking to overcome the effects of the Force Majeure event and its current good faith estimate as to when it will be able to resume performance of its obligations.
16.5 | Remedial Steps |
As soon as practicable after the occurrence of an event of Force Majeure, the Party claiming relief shall take all reasonable steps in the applicable circumstances to remedy the failure, inability or occurrence, but such Party claiming relief shall not be obligated to:
16.5.1 | Incur any extraordinary costs or make more than commercially reasonable investments; |
16.5.2 | Bring into production any existing or potential reserves not already flowing under this Agreement; |
16.5.3 | Buy Gas from a third party, or respectively, to sell Gas to a third party; and |
16.5.4 | Remedy any failure of the Transporter to take delivery of, transport, or deliver Gas in satisfaction of such Partys obligations respecting a Proper Nomination. |
16.6 | Access |
Upon written request from the other, the Party claiming relief shall as soon as reasonably possible to the extent it is entitled to do so give or procure access or if it is not so entitled shall use reasonable endeavors to procure access (subject in each case to operational constraints) for a reasonable number of representatives of the other Party to examine the scene (if any) of the event or circumstance causing the failure, inability or occurrence (such access to be at the sole risk and cost of the Party seeking access).
81
16.7 | Extended Force Majeure |
If by reason of an event of Force Majeure any Party ( Affected Party ) is unable to perform any material obligation required to be performed under this Agreement and such inability to perform continues for a period of two hundred and seventy (270) consecutive Days from the date of commencement of the Force Majeure event, the other Party that has not invoked the Force Majeure may terminate this Agreement by giving a ninety (90) Days prior written notice to the Affected Party and upon the expiration of such notice period this Agreement will terminate without prejudice to any rights of the Parties that have accrued prior to such date, except if, before the specified termination date such Force Majeure event and such inability has ended.
82
17. | Default |
17.1 | Shortfall Gas |
17.1.1 | With effect from the Commencement Date, if the Sellers fail in respect of any Day and/or Month to make available for delivery the quantity of Specification Gas Properly Nominated for delivery, for any reason other than the Buyers failure for any reason to take Specification Gas otherwise properly tendered for delivery in accordance with this Agreement, in excess of the Daily Delivery Tolerance and/or the [***], such amount will be Shortfall Gas and that part of the Shortfall Gas which (i) does not exceed [***] of the Proper Nomination in respect of that Day; or (ii) is deemed as Shortfall Gas on a monthly basis in respect of the aggregate Proper Nominations made during a certain Month; shall be referred to herein as First Shortfall Gas and that part of the Shortfall Gas which exceeds [***] of the Proper Nomination in respect of that Day shall be referred to herein as Second Shortfall Gas . |
17.1.2 | In order to avoid any doubt, Shortfall Gas shall not include any quantity for which the Sellers are relieved from liability in accordance with Article 16 and any Permitted Delivery Reduction pursuant to Article 2.6.5. |
17.2 | Shortfall Aggregate |
17.2.1 | The total of First Shortfall Gas in respect of any Month shall be aggregated as at the end of that Month (such aggregate amount together with any additions thereto pursuant to Article 17.2.3 being herein referred to as the First Shortfall Aggregate ) and the total of Second Shortfall Gas in respect of any Month shall be aggregated as at the end of that Month (such aggregate amount together with any additions thereto pursuant to Article 17.2.4 being herein referred to as Second Shortfall Aggregate . The First Shortfall Aggregate and the Second Shortfall Aggregate are collectively referred to as the Shortfall Aggregate ). |
17.2.2 |
The first Gas delivered after the end of that Month under this Agreement up to an amount equal to the First Shortfall Aggregate which would otherwise be paid for by the Buyer at the Contract Price, shall be paid for at the First |
83
Shortfall Price. The next Gas delivered after the end of that Month under this Agreement up to an amount equal to the Second Shortfall Aggregate which would otherwise be paid for by the Buyer at the Contract Price, shall be paid for at the Second Shortfall Price. The First Shortfall Aggregate and the Second Shortfall Aggregate shall be reduced by the amount of Gas which is paid for at the First Shortfall Price and Second Shortfall Price, respectively. |
17.2.3 | To the extent that at the end of any Month the First Shortfall Aggregate exceeds the amount of Gas delivered in the next succeeding Month and paid for at the First Shortfall Price, the balance shall be carried forward and be added to the First Shortfall Aggregate for the next succeeding Month or Months (as the case may require). |
17.2.4 | To the extent that at the end of any Month the Second Shortfall Aggregate exceeds the amount of Gas delivered in the next succeeding Month and paid for at the Second Shortfall Price, the balance shall be carried forward and be added to the Second Shortfall Aggregate for the next succeeding Month or Months (as the case may require). |
17.2.5 | If the aggregate money value of: |
(a) | the product of the First Shortfall Aggregate and the difference between the First Shortfall Price and the Contract Price; or |
(b) | the product of the Second Shortfall Aggregate and the difference between the Second Shortfall Price and the Contract Price; |
(as calculated in accordance with the applicable Shortfall Price under Article 10.2.4 or Article 17.3.4), exceeds [***].
84
17.2.6 | If at what would otherwise be the end of the Contract Period there is any quantity of [***], at Buyers option, which will be notified to the Sellers by not later than one hundred and twenty (120) Days before the end of the Contract Period: |
(a) | subject to the limitations of liability under Articles 17.3.5, 17.3.6 and 17.3.7 (as applicable), the Sellers shall [***] at the end of such final Contract Year; or |
(b) | this Agreement shall not terminate on that date but shall continue in full force and effect for a number of Days equal to [***]. |
17.3 | Limitations of Liability |
17.3.1 | The payment by the Buyer to the Sellers for a quantity of Gas equal to the Minimum Bill Quantity for a Contract Year shall be the Sellers exclusive remedy and be the limit of all and any liability of the Buyer and shall be in full satisfaction of all rights, costs, claims, and damages (whether direct, indirect, consequential or otherwise and howsoever arising) in respect of any failure to take the Minimum Bill Quantity in that Contract Year, including as a result of Article 7.2, other than any termination right accruing to the Sellers under this Agreement or pursuant to applicable law, or the right of the Sellers to specific performance. |
17.3.2 | The Buyer shall not be liable to the Sellers and the Sellers shall not be liable to the Buyer for any Consequential Loss. |
17.3.3 | To the extent any damages are required to be paid hereunder are liquidated, the Parties hereby acknowledge and agree that the liquidated damages constitute an adequate compensation and shall be the exclusive remedy in such circumstances. |
17.3.4 |
The delivery by the Sellers of a quantity of Gas to be paid for by the Buyer at the First Shortfall Price or Second Shortfall Price, as the case may be, or payments made according to the provisions of Articles 17.2.5 or 17.2.6 (if |
85
applicable) shall be the Buyers exclusive remedy (other than any termination right accruing to the Buyer under this Agreement or pursuant to applicable law, or the right of the Buyer to specific performance) and the limit of all and any liability of the Sellers and shall be in full satisfaction of all rights, costs, claims, and damages (whether direct, indirect, consequential or otherwise and howsoever arising) in respect of Sellers failure to deliver Properly Nominated Gas to the Buyer, including as a result of a breach of Article 7.1, except that [***] of the Contract Price. |
17.3.5 | In respect of Sellers failure to deliver Gas in the circumstances of Article 2.3.1, (i) the delivery by the Sellers of a quantity of Gas to be paid for by the Buyer at the applicable Shortfall Price up to an aggregate money value (as calculated in accordance with Article 17.2.5) equal to [***] (ii) or the payment of the amount of up to [***] in accordance with Article 17.2.5 or Article 17.2.6; (or a combination of (i) and (ii) above up to a total aggregate money value equal to [***] shall be the exclusive remedy and the limit of all and any liability of the Sellers and shall be in full satisfaction of all rights, costs, claims, and damages (whether direct, indirect, consequential or otherwise and howsoever arising) in respect of Sellers failure to deliver Gas in the circumstances of Article 2.3.1. |
17.3.6 |
In respect of Sellers failure to deliver Gas in the circumstances of Article 2.7.7, 2.7.9 and 2.7.12, (i) the delivery by the Sellers of a quantity of Gas to be paid for by the Buyer at the applicable Shortfall Price up to an aggregate money value (as calculated in accordance with Article 17.2.5) equal to [***] or (ii) the payment of the amount of up to [***] in accordance with Article 17.2.5 or Article 17.2.6, (or a combination of (i) and (ii) above up to a total aggregate money value equal to or the payment of the amount of up to [***] |
86
shall be the exclusive remedy and the limit of all and any liability of the Sellers and shall be in full satisfaction of all rights, costs, claims, and damages (whether direct, indirect, consequential or otherwise and howsoever arising) in respect of Sellers failure to deliver Gas in the circumstances of Article 2.7.7, Article 2.7.9 and Article 2.7.12. |
17.3.7 | Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Sellers total liability in respect of Sellers failure to deliver Properly Nominated Gas to the Buyer pursuant to this Agreement, including as a result of a breach of Articles 4, 6.3.2, 7.1 and 12, and all other breaches of any or all of their undertakings and obligations under this Agreement, shall not exceed a total amount equal to [***] for the whole Contract Period, excluding any amount paid under Article 17.3.5 and Article 17.3.6. The limitation of liability under this Article 17.3.7 shall not apply to the aggregate money value of any Gas delivered by the Sellers in reduction of the First Shortfall Aggregate and the Second Shortfall Aggregate in accordance with Article 17.2.2, however such limitation shall apply to any and all amounts paid in accordance with Articles 17.2.5 - 17.2.6 (excluding any amount paid pursuant to Article 17.3.5 and Article 17.3.6). |
17.3.8 | Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Buyers total liability for any breach of any or all of their undertakings and obligations under this Agreement including as a result of a breach of Articles 4 and 7.2, shall not exceed for the whole Contract Period a total amount equal to [***]. This limitation of liability shall not apply to payments due on Gas delivered to the Buyer under this Agreement, and to amounts due pursuant to Article 9. |
17.3.9 | In the event either Party incurs damages to which it is entitled for compensation by the other Party under this Agreement, and such damages exceed the limitations of liability set in Articles 17.3.5 - 17.3.8, then, the Party that has incurred the damages may, within twelve (12) Months of the occurrence of the excess damages, terminate this Agreement by written notice to the other Party, unless the other Party has agreed to compensate the Party for any such excess damages. |
17.3.10 | The Parties hereby acknowledge that the limitations of liability or exclusive remedies stipulated in Articles 17.3.4 - 17.3.8 shall not be construed as allowing a Party to intentionally and continuously breach its material undertakings hereunder with the intention of commercial gain. |
87
18. | Assignment and Security Interests |
18.1 | General |
18.1.1 | For the purposes of this Article 18, the expression Party means the Buyer of the one part and each of the Sellers of the other part, as appropriate. |
18.1.2 | No Party shall assign or transfer its rights and/or obligations under this Agreement or any part thereof except in accordance with the provisions of this Article 18. Any assignment or transfer made without fulfilling the provisions of this Article 18 shall be of no effect. |
18.2 | Transfer to Affiliates or Among Sellers |
18.2.1 | The Buyer and each of the Sellers may assign or transfer all or any portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement (in this Article 18 transfer) to an Affiliate without the consent of the other Party, subject to the following: |
(a) | Prior to such transfer, the transferring Party shall provide to the other Party details of the rights and obligations to be transferred and the name of the Affiliate (or if a transfer between Sellers, the name of the Seller to which the interest is to be transferred); and |
(b) | At the time of such transfer, the transferee shall undertake to observe and perform the obligations under this Agreement transferred to it; and |
(c) | Within seven (7) Days after such transfer, the transferring Party shall give to the other Party notice of such transfer together with documentation regarding fulfillment of the provisions of Article 18.2.1(a) and 18.2.1(b) above. |
18.2.2 | It is agreed that in the event of a transfer in accordance with the provisions of Article 18.2.1 above, the transferring Party shall remain fully liable to the other Party for the performance by the transferee of its obligations and discharge of its liabilities under this Agreement, except where the transferee has fulfilled the additional provisions of Article 18.3.1, in which case the transferring Party will be relieved of liability upon fulfillment of such provisions. |
18.2.3 |
The provisions of Article 18.2.1 and 18.2.2 above will also apply to the transfer of rights and obligations from any of the Sellers to another Seller, except that, |
88
in the event of a transfer from any of the Sellers to another Seller, the transferring Seller will be relieved from liability to the Buyer for the performance of its obligations and discharge of its liabilities under this Agreement. |
18.3 | Transfer Generally |
18.3.1 | Any transfer by the Buyer, or by each of the Sellers to a third party (other than to an Affiliate or among Sellers as set out in Article 18.2), may only be made if the transferring Party shall: |
(a) | reasonably satisfy the other Party that such proposed transferee has the financial and the technical status and ability to observe and perform the obligations to be transferred (regardless of any comparison with the corresponding status and ability of the transferring Party), and the Party wishing to transfer has given notice to that effect to the other and with such notice has given any necessary information to show such financial and technical status and ability of the proposed transferee. In such event, unless the Party to whom the notice has been given has within thirty (30) Days given notice that it is not satisfied (stating the reasons therefore), it shall be deemed to be satisfied. Where the transferring Party is the Buyer, the transfer will be subject to (i) the provision by the transferee to the Sellers of appropriate financial securities or guarantees and appropriate technical assurances in connection with such transfer to the Sellers full satisfaction; and (ii) that the transfer be made together with a transfer to the transferee of the Buyers Facilities; |
(b) | provide to the other Party, details of the rights and obligations to be transferred; |
(c) | in the event of a transfer by the Buyer, provide to the Sellers a new Credit Cover to replace the Credit Cover provided pursuant to Article 20, in respect of the obligations to be transferred to the proposed transferee in the same terms ( mutatis mutandis ) as the existing Credit Cover; and |
(d) |
obligate the transferee to observe and perform all the obligations of this Agreement transferred to it, including in the case of a transfer by a |
89
Seller, the obligation by the transferee to assume liability (commensurate with the interest transferred) in respect of all and any Make-Up Aggregate, Carry Forward Aggregate and Shortfall Aggregates accrued at the effective date of such transfer. |
18.3.2 | With effect from the effective date of a transfer pursuant to this Article 18.3, the transferring Party shall, to the extent that it has transferred its obligations under this Agreement, be relieved from its obligations hereunder, but (except for the obligations assumed by the transferee of a Seller pursuant to Article 18.3.1(d)) no such transfer shall operate to relieve the transferring Party of any liability accrued under or pursuant to the terms of this Agreement prior to the effective date of such transfer. |
18.3.3 | Within seven (7) Days after such transfer, the transferring Party, jointly with the transferee, shall give to the other Party written notice of such transfer. |
18.4 | Security for Sellers Financing |
18.4.1 | Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Seller may at any time (upon giving the Buyer not less than thirty (30) Days prior written notice thereof) assign its rights to the receipt of any monies due or to become due to it from the Buyer under this Agreement to or in favor of banks, bona fide financial entities or other lenders (individually and collectively referred to as Sellers Lenders ) as security for any financing or otherwise. |
18.4.2 | The authority given by the Seller to the Buyer (consequent upon an assignment which has been made under the provisions of Article 18.4.1) to make payment of monies due hereunder to the Sellers Lenders may be revoked by a notice given to the Buyer by the Seller which complies with the provisions of Article 11.4 and which expressly revokes such authority. |
18.4.3 | Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Seller may at any time (upon giving the Buyer not less than thirty (30) day prior written notice thereof) create, subject to the terms of this Article 18.4.3, any security over all or any of its rights under this Agreement, (the Charged Assets ) (except for the creation of security in respect of its rights hereunder to receive monies in respect of which rights the terms of Article 18.4.1 apply in relation to creation of security), the Sellers Interest, the Sellers Percentage and/or its interest in the Sellers Facilities in favor of Sellers Lenders as security for any financing. |
90
18.4.4 | The Buyer agrees, if required by any Sellers Lender, to provide Sellers Lenders with acknowledgments evidencing its consent to creating a security interest over the Charged Assets including by way of assignment of this Agreement, and which shall include reasonable terms and conditions customary for an acknowledgement of this type, regarding the right of the Sellers Lenders to assume the obligations of the Sellers hereunder or to assign or transfer these obligations to a third party nominated by the Sellers Lenders in accordance with the provisions of Article 18, to require the Buyer to make any payments due to a Seller pursuant to this Agreement directly into a collateral security account maintained by or on behalf of the Sellers Lenders and to provide notice to such parties and a reasonable opportunity for such parties to remedy the event giving rise to a right of termination prior to exercising any such right. |
18.5 | Security for Buyers Financing |
18.5.1 | Notwithstanding the foregoing Buyer may at any time (upon giving the Sellers not less than thirty (30) Days prior written notice thereof) assign its rights to the receipt of any monies due or to become due from the Sellers to it under this Agreement to or in favor of banks, bona fide financial entities or other lenders (individually and collectively referred to as Buyers Lenders ) as security for any financing or otherwise. |
18.5.2 | The authority given by the Buyer to the Sellers (consequent upon an assignment which has been made under the provisions of Article 18.5.1) to make payment of monies due hereunder to the Buyers Lenders may be revoked by a notice given to the Sellers by the Buyer which complies with the provisions of Article 11.4 and which expressly revokes such authority. |
18.5.3 | Notwithstanding the foregoing, Buyer may at any time (upon giving the Sellers not less than thirty (30) Day prior written notice thereof) create, subject to the terms of this Article 18.5.3, any security over all or any of its rights under this Agreement in favor of Buyers Lenders as security for any financing. |
91
18.5.4 | The Sellers agree, if required by any Buyers Lender, to provide Buyers Lender with acknowledgments evidencing its consent to creating a security interest over the Buyers rights under this Agreement including by way of assignment of this Agreement, and which shall include reasonable terms and conditions customary for an acknowledgement of this type, regarding the right of the Buyers Lenders to assume the obligations of the Buyer hereunder or to assign or transfer these obligations to a third party nominated by the Buyers Lenders in accordance with the provisions of Article 18, to require the Seller to make any payments due to the Buyer pursuant to this Agreement directly into a collateral security account maintained by or on behalf of the Buyers Lenders and to provide notice to such parties and a reasonable opportunity for such parties to remedy the event giving rise to a right of termination prior to exercising any such right. |
92
19. | Governing Law and Dispute Resolution |
19.1 | Governing Law |
This Agreement (and any Dispute hereunder) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the substantive laws of the State of Israel. In resolving any Dispute, the Expert or the arbitrator(s) shall take into account international petroleum industry practices insofar as they are not inconsistent with the law of Israel.
19.2 | Dispute Resolution |
Any dispute, claim, or controversy arising out of or relating to this Agreement, including without limitation any issue regarding the existence, validity, enforceability, interpretation, application, performance, breach, formation or termination of this Agreement or any provisions of this Agreement (each a Dispute ), shall be resolved exclusively and finally in accordance with the provisions of this Article 19.
19.2.1 | Disputes that are to be submitted to Expert Determination in accordance with Articles 6.5.8, 12.3.1 and 15.3 shall be resolved by Expert Determination in accordance with the provisions of Article 19.3 ( Expert Determination ); and |
19.2.2 | Any Dispute (other than those referred to in Article 19.2.1 but including any Dispute regarding the conduct, interpretation, enforcement or application of the Expert Determination), shall be resolved by Arbitration in accordance with the provisions of Article 19.4 ( Arbitration ). |
19.3 | Expert Determination |
19.3.1 | Procedure for Appointment |
The procedure for the appointment of the Expert shall be as follows:
(a) | The Party initiating Expert Determination shall give written notice to that effect to the other Party and with such notice shall give specific details of the Dispute to be resolved by the Expert. |
(b) | The Parties shall endeavor to agree on a Person to act as the Expert to whom the Dispute shall be referred for Determination. |
(c) |
If within fourteen (14) Days from the delivery of the notice initiating the Expert Determination, the Parties have failed to agree upon the Expert to |
93
be appointed pursuant to Article 19.3.1(b), then the LCIA shall serve as appointing authority to appoint the Expert. Either Party may submit a written application to the LCIA, with a copy to the other Party, detailing the nature of the Dispute and the issues to be determined, setting out any matters the applicant may wish to bring to the attention of the LCIA for the purposes of making the appointment. Within ten (10) Days of the submission of the Application to the LCIA, the other Party shall submit to the LCIA a reply to the Application. Within fourteen (14) Days from the time of the reply to the application, the LCIA shall appoint a person to act as Expert, and in so doing the LCIA may take such independent advice as it thinks fit. |
(d) | The Expert Determination shall be administered by the LCIA, which shall act as appointing authority and determine any challenges brought to the Expert. The LCIAs charges shall be in accordance with its schedule of arbitration fees and costs (Schedule of Fees) as in effect at the time the Expert Determination proceeding is initiated. |
(e) | Prior to his appointment, the Expert shall provide the LCIA with a resumé of his experience, qualifications, and prior and present professional positions; shall agree in writing to a fee rate in accordance with the LCIA Schedule of Costs as then in effect; and shall sign a declaration to the effect that there are no circumstances known to him likely to give rise to any reasonable doubt regarding his independence and impartiality. The expert shall undertake a continuing obligation to disclose to the LCIA and the Parties any circumstances which may give rise to any reasonable doubt regarding his independence and impartiality after his appointment and before the conclusion of the Expert Determination. |
(f) |
If circumstances exist giving rise to justifiable doubts about the Experts independence or impartiality, a Party may challenge the appointment or continued service of the Expert by giving written notice to the LCIA within fourteen (14) days of the appointment or within fourteen (14) Days of the challenging Party becoming aware of the circumstances |
94
giving rise to such doubts. Unless the challenged Expert withdraws or the other Parties agree to the challenge, the LCIA shall, within fourteen (14) Days, decide the challenge. If the challenge is sustained, the LCIA shall thereafter appoint a replacement Expert. |
(g) | If the Expert is either unwilling or unable to accept such appointment or has not confirmed his willingness and ability to accept such appointment within the said period of fourteen (14) Days, then either Party may request the LCIA to appoint another Person as the Expert and the process shall be repeated until an Expert is found who accepts appointment. |
(h) | The Parties shall cooperate with each other to ensure that the terms and conditions of the contract of appointment of the Expert are agreed with such Person as soon as possible. |
19.3.2 | Nature of Proceeding, Qualifications, and Confidentiality |
(a) | The Expert shall act as an expert and not as an arbitrator. The law relating to arbitration shall not apply to the Expert or his determination or the procedure by which he reaches his determination. |
(b) | The Expert Determination proceedings shall be conducted in the English language. |
(c) | The failure of any Party to participate in the Expert Determination or to comply with any of the requirements of this Article shall not prevent the Expert Determination from proceeding or impair the validity and enforceability of the Expert Determination. |
(d) | The determination of the Expert shall be final and binding upon the Parties, save in the event of fraud or manifest error. |
(e) | No Person shall be appointed as the Expert unless such Person shall be qualified by education, experience, and training to determine the Dispute. |
(f) | No Person shall be appointed as the Expert who at the time of appointment is (or within two (2) Years before such appointment has been) a director, office holder or an employee of, or directly or indirectly retained as consultant to, either Party or any Affiliate of either Party or is the holder of shares directly or indirectly in a Party. |
95
(g) | Any Person appointed as the Expert shall not be entitled to act as the Expert and shall promptly resign, if, at the time of the appointment or at any time before giving any determination under such appointment, such Person has or may have some interest or duty which materially conflicts or may materially conflict with such Persons function under such appointment. |
(h) | All information, data or documentation disclosed or delivered to the Expert in consequence of or in connection with the Experts appointment hereunder, shall be treated as confidential. Except for disclosure to technical or professional advisors under Article 19.3.3(a)(ii), the Expert shall not disclose to any Person any such information, data or documentation and all such information data and documentation shall remain the property of the Party disclosing or delivering the same and all copies thereof shall be returned on completion of the Experts work. |
(i) | Copies of all submissions and communications shall be provided to the LCIA, and once appointed, to the Expert, and to all other Parties. |
(j) | The terms of appointment of the Expert shall contain an obligation on the part of the Expert to comply with such obligations as aforesaid. |
19.3.3 | Terms of Reference of the Expert |
(a) | The terms of reference of the Expert shall contain ( inter alia ) provisions that: |
(i) | the Expert shall not later than twenty-one (21) Days after his appointment call the Parties to a meeting in Israel or such other place as the Parties may agree at which he shall raise any matters requiring clarification (whether arising out of his contract of appointment, the Dispute, or otherwise) and lay down the timetable and procedural rules to be applied, which timetable and rules shall not be inconsistent with the terms of this Article; |
96
(ii) | the Parties shall be entitled and required to supply data, documentation, and information and make written submissions to the Expert as the Expert deems necessary and appropriate for determining the Dispute; |
(iii) | the Expert shall be entitled to obtain such independent professional and/or technical advice as he may reasonably require; |
(iv) | any and all communications between and submissions made by either of the Parties and the Expert shall be made in English in writing and a copy thereof provided simultaneously to the other Party. The Expert shall not engage in any ex parte communications with any of the Parties. No meeting between the Expert and the Parties or either of them shall take place unless both Parties have a reasonable opportunity to attend any such meeting; |
(v) | the Expert may adopt such procedures and may conduct the Expert determination in such manner as he deems appropriate, consistent with the provisions of this Article. The Expert may hold an evidentiary hearing and require the Parties to attend and present evidence if he deems it reasonably necessary for the determination of the Dispute; |
(vi) | the Expert shall issue his final Determination within ninety (90) Days of his appointment, or as soon thereafter as reasonably practicable or the Parties may agree in writing. The Experts Determination shall be in writing and shall state the reasons therefore. The Expert shall provide to the Parties a draft of his proposed Determination in respect of which both Parties shall be entitled to respond and make representations to the Expert within twenty-one (21) Days after receipt of the draft Determination; and |
(vii) | as soon as possible after the twenty-one (21) Days period referred to in Article 19.3.3(a)(v), the Expert shall issue his final Determination. |
97
(b) | If the Expert fails or refuses to comply with the terms of reference or to timely issue the Determination, then the Dispute shall be submitted to Arbitration as provided in Article 19.4. |
(c) | Each Party shall bear the costs of providing all data, information and submissions given by it and the costs and expenses of all witnesses and Persons retained by it. The costs and expenses of the Expert and any independent advisers to the Expert shall be borne in the manner determined by the Expert and, failing such determination, one half by the Buyer and one half by the Sellers. |
19.4 | Arbitration |
19.4.1 | Except as referred to an Expert as set forth in Articles 19.2 and 19.3, any Dispute shall be referred to and finally and exclusively resolved by Arbitration in accordance with this Article 19.4. |
19.4.2 | Disputes relating to matters with an amount in controversy of less than [***] shall be determined by a single arbitrator, in accordance with the Rules of Arbitration of the LCIA. The seat of the Arbitration shall be Tel Aviv, Israel. If the Parties do not agree that the amount in controversy does not exceed [***], or if the Dispute involves a claim for relief other than monetary relief, then the Arbitration shall be heard and determined by a tribunal of three (3) arbitrators in accordance with the provisions of Article 19.4.3. |
19.4.3 | Disputes relating to matters with an amount in controversy of [***] or more shall be heard and determined by a tribunal of three (3) arbitrators. The Arbitration shall be conducted pursuant to the LCIA Rules. The seat of Arbitration shall be London, England. |
19.4.4 | With respect to any Dispute, the amount in controversy shall be based upon the amount claimed in the proceeding in all claims and counterclaims in the aggregate, exclusive of interest or attorneys fees, and including the actual or potential value to the Parties of any matters for which a declaration of the meaning, effect, or application of any terms, rights, or obligations arising out of or relating to this Agreement is requested, or for which other non-monetary relief is sought. |
98
19.4.5 | If a single arbitrator is to determine the Dispute, the Parties shall endeavor to agree on the arbitrator. If the Parties are unable to agree on the arbitrator within thirty (30) Days of the date for the Respondents Response to the request for Arbitration, then the arbitrator shall be appointed by the LCIA in accordance with its Rules. The arbitrator shall be qualified by experience and education to determine matters in the nature of the Dispute. |
19.4.6 | If the Dispute is to be determined by a tribunal of three (3) arbitrators, the Claimant(s) and Respondent(s) shall each nominate a person to serve as arbitrator as provided in the LCIA Rules. The two arbitrators so appointed and confirmed shall, within thirty (30) Days of their confirmation or such other time as the Parties may agree in writing, nominate a third person as arbitrator, who upon confirmation shall serve as the Chair of the Tribunal. In the event the two arbitrators so appointed and confirmed do not agree within the specified time on the nomination of a third arbitrator, a third arbitrator shall be nominated and appointed in accordance with the LCIA Rules. The arbitrators so appointed shall be qualified by education and experience to determine matters in the nature of the Dispute. |
19.4.7 | No person shall be appointed as an arbitrator under this Agreement if at the time of appointment he is (or within three (3) Years before such appointment has been) a director, office holder, or an employee of, or directly or indirectly retained as consultant to, either Party or any Affiliate of either Party or is the holder of shares directly or indirectly in a Party. |
19.4.8 | Any person appointed as an arbitrator shall not be entitled to act as an arbitrator if, at the time of the appointment or at any time before giving the award under the Arbitration, such person has or may have some interest or duty which materially conflicts or may materially conflict with his function under such appointment. |
99
19.4.9 | The Arbitration proceedings shall be held as promptly as possible at such place in Israel or England (as applicable) (or other place agreed to by both Parties) and at such time as the arbitrator(s) shall determine. |
19.4.10 | The Parties hereby waive any reference to the courts under Sections 45 and 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996, and under sections 21(a) and 29(b) of the Israeli Arbitration Law 1968 and the first supplement thereto. |
19.4.11 | All Arbitration proceedings shall be conducted in and all awards rendered in the English language. |
19.4.12 | The arbitrator(s) shall be bound by the substantive laws of the State of Israel however they shall not be bound by the rules of evidence and civil procedure. The arbitrators shall not act as amiable compositeur or ex aequo et bono. |
19.4.13 | The award shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and shall be without right of appeal. Judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. |
19.4.14 | The arbitral tribunal has the power and authority to award actual money damages, and to award declaratory, injunctive, or mandatory relief, including ordering specific performance. Any award of monetary damages shall be made in U.S. Dollars, and shall include interest thereon from the date of breach until paid. The arbitrators shall have no power to award, and the award shall not include consequential, punitive, or other special damages. |
19.4.15 | The fees of the arbitrator(s) and costs incidental to Arbitration proceedings, including legal expenses of the Parties, shall be borne in accordance with the determination of the arbitrator(s). |
19.4.16 | Any Arbitration rendered pursuant to this Article 19.4 is an international arbitration for the purposes of Israeli law, English law, United States law, and the New York Convention on the on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, 1958. |
19.4.17 | This Article constitutes an arbitration agreement between the Parties as defined in the Israeli Arbitration Law- 1968. |
100
19.5 | Jurisdiction |
19.5.1 | Subject to the above mentioned dispute resolution mechanism and the arbitration provisions set forth above in this Article: (i) in the event that the seat of the Arbitration is Tel Aviv, Israel - exclusive jurisdiction in respect of any matter relating to this Agreement shall be exclusively vested in the competent courts of Tel Aviv Jaffa; and (ii) in the event that the seat of the Arbitration is London, England - exclusive jurisdiction in respect of any matter relating to this Agreement shall be exclusively vested in the competent courts of London, England. |
101
20. | Security and Credit Cover |
20.1 | The Credit Cover |
20.1.1 | Following the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) Buyers rating is less than S&Ps rating A+ or Moodys rating A1; (ii) Buyer ceases to be rated by either of these agencies; or (iii) Buyer fails to meet its payment obligations in accordance with Article 11 in respect of any amounts which it owes to the Sellers under this Agreement, but in no event prior to the Availability Date or the Late Availability date (if applicable), Buyer will provide and maintain for the benefit of the Sellers, (to each Seller in accordance with the Sellers Percentage) Credit Cover for the period from the Month immediately following the Month in which such event has occurred until December 31 of that Year, and thereafter during the remaining Contract Period, within thirty (30) Days before the first day of each Contract Year for the duration of the following Contract Year. |
20.1.2 | Notwithstanding Article 20.1.1, in the event that a Credit Cover has been provided due to Buyers failure to maintain the credit rating levels specified in Article 20.1.1(i) or 20.1.1(ii), and the Buyer thereafter attains a Credit Rating which meets such levels (or higher), then Credit Cover shall not be required for the period during which the credit rating meets the levels required under Article 20.1.1(i) and the Credit Cover shall be returned to the Buyer within fourteen (14) Days following the Buyers request. |
20.1.3 | The Credit Cover shall be in a total amount in U.S. Dollars equal to [***]. During the Second Period the Credit Cover shall be reduced in accordance with the Reduction Ratio. |
20.1.4 | In the event the Credit Cover provided by Buyer is a [***] of the Credit Cover amount pursuant to Article 20.1.3. |
102
20.2 | Draw Down on the Credit Cover |
20.2.1 | In the event of failure by the Buyer to pay any payment due pursuant to this Agreement for seven (7) Business Days from the applicable due date, then any Seller shall be entitled to call on or draw down against its share of any Credit Cover to the extent that, and at such time as, the Buyer has failed to meet its payment obligations in respect of any amounts which it owes to such Seller pursuant to this Agreement, by a seven (7) Days prior written notice to the Buyer. In the event the Sellers draw down any amount under the Buyers Credit Cover, Buyer will within seven (7) Business Days thereafter provide the Sellers with additional Credit Cover in an amount equal to the amount that was so drawn by the Sellers. |
20.2.2 | Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 2.9, if the Buyer has not provided any Seller with the Credit Cover within seven (7) Days after the respective date for the provision of the Credit Cover referred to in Article 20.1.1, then the Seller may: (i) call on and draw down against the existing Credit Cover (in whole or in part) as if the Buyer had been in default in paying the Sellers any amount due under the Credit Cover; (ii) suspend delivery of Specification Gas hereunder; and (ii) by giving the Buyer fifteen (15) Days notice, terminate this Agreement, provided that the Credit Cover has not been furnished by the expiry of that period. |
103
21. | Gas Sale and Purchase Agreements [***] |
The Parties hereby agree that notwithstanding the fact that on even date the Sellers have entered into Gas Sale and Purchase Agreements [***].
104
22. | Relationship and Sellers Coordinator |
22.1 | Relationship of Sellers |
22.1.1 | The Sellers are acting jointly in relation to matters such as the development of the reservoirs in Sellers Petroleum Rights, the Sellers Facilities and the production, transportation and delivery of Specification Gas under this Agreement (and acting through the Sellers Coordinator in the circumstances set out in Article 22.2), but it is acknowledged by the Buyer (notwithstanding that this Agreement is entered into by all the Sellers with the Buyer) that nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute as between the Sellers any joint liability and each of the Sellers shall be liable to the Buyer only in respect of its Sellers Percentage of such liability of the Sellers as may arise under this Agreement. |
22.1.2 | Notwithstanding that the Buyer may make nominations for the delivery of Specification Gas under this Agreement in an aggregate nomination in a single notice delivered to the Sellers Coordinator pursuant to Article 22.2.1, the quantity deemed to have been nominated for delivery by each Seller shall be its respective Sellers Percentage of the aggregate quantity so nominated. |
22.1.3 | The quantity of Specification Gas deemed to have been delivered at the Delivery Point by each of the Sellers in respect of each Day shall be its respective Sellers Percentage of the aggregate quantity of Specification Gas delivered by the Sellers at the Delivery Point in response to the Buyers nomination. To the extent that such aggregate quantity falls short of the Proper Nomination, such Shortfall shall be attributed to each of the Sellers in proportion to its respective Sellers Percentage. |
22.2 | Sellers Coordinator |
22.2.1 |
The Sellers hereby appoint Noble Energy Mediterranean Ltd. as their representative (herein called the Sellers Coordinator , which expression shall include any successor appointed as provided herein) who shall be authorized to and shall act as the representative for the Sellers under this Agreement for the following purposes (provided that the authority hereby given to the Sellers Coordinator relating to the giving of notices, nominations, |
105
statements and estimates shall not preclude the Sellers from giving any notices, nominations, statements and estimates which are within the scope of such authority): |
(a) | the giving and receiving of all notices, nominations, estimates, and requests, provided that such authority shall not extend to a notice of termination of this Agreement; |
(b) | the giving and receiving of all financial and other statements, reports and information hereunder; |
(c) | the making and witnessing of the measurement and testing of Specification Gas delivered to the Buyer under this Agreement and of the Measurement Equipment and adjustments to such equipment; and |
(d) | the settling with the Buyer of all disputes or differences between the Parties hereunder: |
(i) | in relation to the applicable DCQ; and/or |
(ii) | arising under Article 14.2 or in relation to the volume and/or Higher Heating Value of Gas delivered in any Day to the Buyer hereunder; and/or |
(iii) | arising under Article 12; and/or |
(iv) | as to whether the Sellers are entitled to relief under Article 16 in respect of any under-delivery of Gas to the Buyer in any Day. |
22.2.2 | The Sellers agree that the Buyer shall be entitled to act upon any or all acts or things done or performed or nominations, notices or statements given or received or agreements made from time to time in respect of the above matters or within the scope of its authority by the Sellers Coordinator as fully and effectively as though the Sellers had themselves done or performed the same. |
22.2.3 | The Sellers may at any time change the Sellers Coordinator by written notice to the Buyer, signed by all the Sellers, provided that at all times during the Contract Period a Sellers Coordinator is appointed. The Sellers shall notify the Buyer reasonable time in advance of any change of the Sellers Coordinator. |
106
22.2.4 | In the event that the Buyer considers the Sellers to be in breach of this Agreement as a result of an alleged failure of the Sellers Coordinator to perform its duties described in this Agreement, the Buyer shall give the Sellers notice thereof and also give the Sellers a period of thirty (30) days to enable the Sellers to rectify or cause to be rectified the alleged breach before the Buyer institutes any legal proceedings in respect thereof. |
22.2.5 | In the event of a contradiction between any notice, nomination statement, estimate or request (for the purposes of this Article 22.2.5, a Notice ) of the Sellers Coordinator and a Notice of any of the Sellers (explicitly acting in their capacity as Sellers), that of the respective Seller shall prevail and be binding upon the Sellers, and the Buyer shall be entitled to rely upon it for all intents and purposes. Where there is a contradiction between two or more Notices issued by different Sellers, the Notice of the Seller whose Notice was last received by the Buyer shall prevail and be binding upon the Sellers, and the Buyer shall be entitled to rely upon it for all intents and purposes. |
107
23. | Miscellaneous Provisions |
23.1 | Performance of Obligations |
Each Party shall be entitled to perform any of its obligations under this Agreement by procuring that such obligations are performed on its behalf by a third party, but such Party shall remain responsible to the other for the due performance of such obligations and for any failure or non-performance of such third party or any operator agents contractors or employees of such third party, as if such Party itself had failed to fulfill the relevant obligations.
23.2 | Waiver |
No waiver by any Party of any default or defaults by the other in the performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall operate or be construed as a waiver of any other or further default or defaults, whether of a like or different character.
23.3 | Successors |
This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Buyer and each of the Sellers and their respective successors and permitted assigns.
23.4 | Notices |
23.4.1 | Any notice to be given by one Party to another under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered by hand to the Party in question or sent to such Party by registered delivery, letter or facsimile or electronic transmission addressed to that Party at such address (or as the case may be, such facsimile transmission number or electronic mail address) as the Party in question may from time to time designate by written notice. |
23.4.2 | Until such notice shall be given, the addresses of the Parties shall be those which appear in this Agreement. |
23.4.3 | All notices delivered by recorded delivery or hand or sent by facsimile or electronic transmission shall be deemed to be effective when received at the recipients address as aforesaid. |
23.4.4 | Any notice (other than routine notices and communications) given by facsimile or electronic transmission shall, unless already acknowledged, be subsequently confirmed by letter sent by registered delivery or delivered by hand, but without prejudice to the validity of the original notice, if received. |
108
23.5 | Counterparts |
This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and each such counterpart shall be deemed an original Agreement for all purposes; provided that no Party shall be bound to this Agreement unless and until all Parties have executed a counterpart.
23.6 | No Third Party Beneficiaries |
The interpretation of this Agreement shall exclude any rights under legislative provisions or court made law conferring rights under a contract to Persons not a party to that contract.
23.7 | Severability |
If any provision of this Agreement is finally determined to be illegal, invalid, void or unenforceable under applicable Law, then such provision shall be deemed to be deleted and the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and if necessary, be so amended as shall be necessary to give effect to the spirit and intent of this Agreement to the extent possible.
23.8 | Entirety |
This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between the Parties as to the matters addressed herein and shall supersede and take the place of all documents, minutes of meetings, letters or notes which may be in existence at the date hereof, and of all written or oral statements, representations and warranties which may have been made by or on behalf of the Parties as to such matters.
23.9 | Survival |
The provisions of Articles 8.3, 11 (to the extent necessary to finalize accounts) and 19 shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
23.10 | Amendments |
No amendment to this Agreement shall be valid unless duly executed by all the Parties.
[ the remainder of this page intentionally left blank ]
109
IN WITNESS of their agreement, each of the Parties has caused its respective duly authorized representatives to sign this instrument in Tel-Aviv Israel, on the 25 th day of November 2012.
110
SCHEDULE 1
Buyers Site
Buyers Power Plant in the Rotem Industrial Zone.
111
SCHEDULE 2
Sellers Percentage
Noble Energy Mediterranean Ltd. |
36.000 | % | ||
Delek Drilling Limited Partnership |
15.625 | % | ||
Avner Oil Exploration Limited Partnership |
15.625 | % | ||
Isramco Negev-2 Limited Partnership |
28.750 | % | ||
Dor Gas Exploration Limited Partnership |
4.000 | % | ||
|
|
|||
Total |
100.000 | % |
112
SCHEDULE 3
[***]
113
SCHEDULE 4
List of Existing Agreements
YT Contracts
[***]
Tamar Contracts
[***]
[***] |
114
SCHEDULE 5
Form of Bank Guarantee
(bank)
(date)
[Insert Name of Seller] |
|
Gentlemen:
Bank Guarantee No.
1. | At the request of [ insert name of Buyer ] ( Debtor ) we hereby unconditionally and irrevocably guarantee the payment to [ Insert Name of Seller ] ( the Seller ) of all amounts which the Debtor owes or may owe to the Seller pursuant to the Gas Sale and Purchase Agreement dated between the Debtor, the Seller and others ( GSPA ), up to the total sum of [ insert Amount ] in the aggregate (Guarantee Amount ). |
2. | Accordingly, we hereby undertake to pay the Seller within seven (7) banking days any amount, not exceeding in the aggregate the Guarantee Amount, which the Seller claims from us from time to time, but prior to the Expiry Time, by written demand ( Payment Demand ). Except for the Payment Demand, the Seller will not be required to provide any proof or other justification to its claim hereunder or to substantiate its demand in any way nor will it be required to first seek payment of the amount claimed from the Debtor or any other person. |
Sellers demand for payment may also be made by way of authenticated swift sent on Sellers behalf by Sellers bankers quoting the full wording of Sellers demand and statement.
3. | This Guarantee is not assignable or transferable. |
4. | This Guarantee shall be governed by Israeli Law and the courts of Israel shall have exclusive jurisdiction in all matters arising therefrom. |
5. |
This Guarantee shall remain in force from the date hereof until noon on [ 20 ] ( Expiry Time ), whereupon this Guarantee shall expire and become null and void and have no further force or |
115
effect whether or not this instrument has been returned to us for cancellation. Any Payment Demand must be delivered to us at the above address of our branch, by not later than the Expiry Time. Any Payment Demand submitted to us after the Expiry Time will not be entertained. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , Signed in this day of in the year
(bank)
116
SCHEDULE 6
Form of [***]
(date)
To:
[ insert name of Seller ]
Whereas on 2012, OPC Rotem Ltd. ( the Debtor) has entered into a Gas Sale and Purchase Agreement with the Sellers (hereinafter: the GSPA) pursuant to which it has undertaken to [***]
117
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Signed in this day of in the year .
118
SCHEDULE 7
Form of Letter of Credit
SAMPLE
[Insert Name of Seller]
(full address)
DEAR SIRS,
RE: IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. (insert number)
AT THE REQUEST OF [ insert name of Buyer ]. (DEBTOR) WE, ( full name and address of issuing bank ), HEREBY ISSUE OUR IRREVOCABLE STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT NO. IN YOUR FAVOR TO GUARANTEE THE PAYMENT TO (THE SELLER) OF ALL AMOUNTS WHICH THE DEBTOR OWES OR MAY OWE TO THE SELLER PURSUANT TO THE GAS SALE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENT DATED BETWEEN THE DEBTOR, THE SELLER AND OTHERS (GSPA), UP TO THE TOTAL SUM OF [USD ] (US DOLLARS MILLION) IN THE AGGREGATE (GUARANTEE AMOUNT).
ACCORDINGLY, WE ( full name of issuing bank ), HEREBY UNDERTAKE TO PAY THE SELLER WITHIN SEVEN (7) BANKING DAYS ANY AMOUNT, NOT EXCEEDING IN THE AGGREGATE THE GUARANTEE AMOUNT, WHICH THE SELLER CLAIMS FROM US FROM TIME TO TIME, BUT PRIOR TO THE EXPIRY DATE, BY WRITTEN DEMAND (PAYMENT DEMAND).
THE ABOVE NOTWITHSTANDING, SELLERS DEMAND(S) UNDER THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT MAY ALSO BE MADE BY AUTHENTICATED SWIFT SENT ON SELLERS BEHALF BY SELLERS BANKERS IN ISRAEL, QUOTING THE FULL WORDING OF SELLERS DEMAND AND STATEMENT. THE ABOVE MENTIONED AUTHENTICATED SWIFT WILL BE CONSIDERED AS A STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT.
EXCEPT FOR THE PAYMENT DEMAND THE SELLER WILL NOT BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ANY PROOF OR OTHER JUSTIFICATION TO ITS CLAIM HEREUNDER OR TO SUBSTANTIATE ITS DEMAND IN ANY WAY NOR WILL IT BE REQUIRED TO FIRST SEEK PAYMENT OF THE AMOUNT CLAIMED FROM THE DEBTOR OR ANY OTHER PERSON.
THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IS NEITHER ASSIGNABLE NOR TRANSFERABLE.
119
THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IS AVAILABLE WITH US AND SHALL REMAIN IN FORCE FROM THE DATE HEREOF UNTIL NOON ON ( insert validity date ) (EXPIRY DATE), WHEREUPON THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT SHALL EXPIRE AND BECOME NULL AND VOID AND HAVE NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT WHETHER OR NOT THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO US FOR CANCELLATION. ANY PAYMENT DEMAND MUST BE DELIVERED TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS OF OUR BRANCH, BY NOT LATER THAN THE EXPIRY DATE. ANY PAYMENT DEMAND SUBMITTED TO US AFTER THE EXPIRY DATE WILL NOT BE ENTERTAINED.
THIS STANDBY LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS (2007 REVISION) INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION NO. 600.
THIS MESSAGE IS THE ONLY OPERATIVE INSTRUMENT, NO MAIL CONFIRMATION WILL FOLLOW.
MESSRS
[THE GUARANTOR]
120
SCHEDULE 8
Specification
Natural Gas tendered for delivery under this Agreement shall at the Delivery Point comply with the following requirements and the requirements of the Transporter as at the date of this Agreement.
1. | Gas made available for transport shall be free from odors, foreign materials, dust or other solid and liquids, waxes, gums and gum forming constituents. The Sellers shall furnish, install, maintain and operate such drips, separators, heaters and other devices as the Seller may deem necessary or desirable to effect compliance with this requirement |
2. | For the avoidance of doubt, it is agreed that the Sellers may (acting as a Reasonable and Prudent Operator) inject substances while processing the Natural Gas provided that the Sellers are able to and do, in fact, remove all of such substances prior to the Delivery Point until the gas meets the current specification. |
3. | Without prejudice to the generality of the provisions of Paragraph 1 & 2 above, gas at the Delivery Point shall conform to the parameters of Table 1. |
4. | Sampling: Sampling of natural gas for continuous automatic and periodic laboratory analysis shall be in accordance with ISO 10715. |
No material may be added to the stream being tested which will alter the tests results or cause the test to be non-representative of the moisture or liquefiable hydrocarbon content of the stream being tested.
5. | Gas Chromatography, Energy Calculations & Reports: Natural gas composition shall be continuously monitored using a gas-chromatograph measuring up to at least C6-plus and compatible with ISO 6974-5. Gas analysis shall be used for further calculations of gas mixture molecular weight, Higher Heating value, density, compressibility, energy & Wobbe Index at reference conditions and at actual line conditions (according to relevancy). Physical properties used to configure chromatographs and perform calorific value and relative density calculations shall be derived from the latest version of GPA Standard 2145/ISO 6976 |
Gas analysis shall be used for further calculations at the Metering Line Flow Computer:
| Gas density at Standard Conditions shall be calculated in accordance with AGA Report No.8:1994/ISO-12213-1:1997 |
| Gas density at Line Conditions shall be calculated in accordance with AGA Report No.8:1994/ISO-12213-1:1997 |
6. | The heating value of C6 shall be applied for all C6-plus compounds as long as laboratory measurements justify this simplicity. The Buyer shall be notified at any change. |
121
7. | Calorific value in MJ/m3 units shall be reported to the 2nd decimal. A factor of 1055.056 MJ/MMBTU shall be used for unit conversion (AGA Report No. 8 & GPA 2172). Values in MMBTU/m3 shall be reported to the 5th decimal figure. (Wobbe index shall be reported accordingly). Compression factor, density and relative density shall be reported (If required) to the 4th decimal figure. |
8. | Average values of continuously measured parameters in Table 1 shall be reported daily. Intermittent measurements shall be reported after completion. |
122
Table 1: Parameters limits
Parameter |
Requirement |
Units |
Methods &
|
|||
Water Dew Point (WDP) At any pressure up to and including 80 bar (g) |
£ 0 (Zero) | ( o C ) | (a) | |||
Hydrocarbon Dew Point (HCDP) At any pressure up to and including 80 bar(g) |
£ 5 | ( o C ) | (b) | |||
Total Sulphur (as S) | < 100 | (ppm Weight) | (c) | |||
Hydrogen Sulphide (as H 2 S) | < 5 | (ppm Volume) | (d) | |||
Carbon Dioxide | £ 3.0 | (Mole percent) | (e) | |||
Total Inerts [N 2 +CO 2 +Ar] | £ 5.0 | (Mole percent) | (f) | |||
Oxygen | £ 0.01 | (Mole percent) | (g) | |||
Methane | ³ 92 | (Mole percent) | (h) | |||
Glycol | No free liquid to be present in gas at Delivery Point | | (i) | |||
Methanol | £ 100 | (ppm volume) | (j) |
123
Table 1 (cont.): Parameters limits
Parameter |
Requirement |
Units |
Methods &
|
|||
Higher Heating Value @ 15/15 o C & 101.325 Kpa |
0.03460 - 0.03950 | MMBTU/Cubic Meter | (k) | |||
Wobbe Index @ 15/15 o C & 101.325 Kpa |
0.04620 - 0.05090 | MMBTU/Cubic Meter | (l) | |||
Supplied gas temperature | 5 38 | ( o C ) | | |||
Pressure |
60-80 maximum pressure not exceeding 80 bar at the Delivery Point. |
bar(a) | |
124
Methods & Remarks
a) Water Dew Point (WDP)
Moisture shall be measured continuously according to ASTM D 5454 - using a water concentration analyzer. The sensor should operate at a fixed controlled temperature greater than the maximum gas stream temperature. The gas sample stream should operate at a controlled pressure no greater than 3 bar (g). Calculation of WDP from the measured water concentration shall be based on equations (or commercial calculators) which produce results that are in agreement with the data given in table C.1 of appendix C to ISO 18543:2004; Natural gas Correlation between water content and water dew point. Direct measurement of WDP according to ISO 6327-1981 (E) is permitted. Manual measurement according to ASTM D 1142 (chilled mirror) shall be the reference method.
b) Hydrocarbon Dew Point (HCDP)
HCDP shall be measured continuously by a chilled mirror instrument working in pressure ranges of 28 ± 3 bar(g), capable of measuring HCDP up to +20 deg C. Manual measurement according to ASTM D 1142 shall be the reference method.
Gas chromatographic laboratory analysis complying with ISO 23874 (and measuring until C 12 ) may serve for research purposes.
c) Total Sulfur and Sulfur species.
Total Sulfur shall be analyzed quarterly in a certified laboratory during the first year of supply. Sulfur species concentrations shall be identified and compared with the concentration of total sulfur. After typical values are determined and no corrosive sulfur is present - then the frequency can be lowered (twice a year in the second year and annually afterwards).
If, however, concentrations greater than 6 mg/m3 of COS or RHS or any corrosive sulfur species (as S) shall be found at any time then total Sulfur shall be measured continuously using an ASTM standard (ASTM D7493 or ASTM D7165 10).
A full laboratory Sulfur species analysis shall be performed with any significant change of gas quality.
d) Hydrogen Sulphide
H2S shall be continuously monitored by automatic instruments complying with ASTM D4084 (Lead acetate reaction rate method).
e, f & g) Oxygen and Total Inerts (N2+CO2+Ar)
N2, O2, Ar & CO2 shall be continuously measured by a GC with a lower detection limit not greater 0.005 % mole, using Helium as a carrier and a suitable column to split N2 and O2.
125
The limiting value for Oxygen in Table 1 is required during normal operations. Higher values are allowed during commissioning of new pipelines.
h) Methane
Methane (and all typical natural gas components) shall be continuously monitored by GC according to ISO 6974-5. The limiting values of Table 1 are valid for the normal routine.
i) Glycol
No free liquid glycol shall be detected while determining the water and/or hydrocarbon dew point using the Bureau of Mines/chilled mirror device.
j) Methanol
Analysis for methanol content will only be required during periods when methanol is being injected for operational reasons. Buyer will be advised when used. Methanol content will be determined using a mutually agreed procedure.
k) Higher Heating Value
Higher Heating Value - means the superior calorific value calculated as described in ISO: 6976: 1995 (E) of one Cubic Meter of Natural Gas at the reference condition of 15/15 Degrees Celsius and 1.01325 Bar(a) for the actual natural gas in the real state. Full precision, definitive mode shall be used.
l) Wobbe Index
Wobbe Index shall be calculated according to ISO: 6976: 1995 (E) at the reference condition of 15/15 Degrees Celsius and 1.01325 Bar (a) for the actual natural gas in the real state. ]
126
Exhibit 23.1
Somekh Chaikin KPMG Millennium Tower 17 Haarbaa Street, PO Box 609 Tel Aviv 61006 Israel |
Telephone Fax Internet |
972 3 684 8000 972 3 684 8444 www.kpmg.co.il |
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
IC Power Ltd.
We consent to the use of our report dated August 27, 2015, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of IC Power Ltd. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, included herein and to the reference to our firm under the heading Experts in the prospectus.
Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
Member Firm of KPMG International
Tel Aviv, Israel
November 2, 2015
Somekh Chaikin, an Israeli partnership and a member firm of the KPMG network of independent member firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), a Swiss entity. |
Exhibit 23.2
|
KPMG en Perú Torre KPMG. Av. Javier Prado Oeste 203 San Isidro. Lima 27, Perú |
Teléfono Fax Internet |
51 (1) 611 3000 51 (1) 421 6943 www.kpmg.com/pe |
Consent of Independent Auditors
The Board of Directors
Generandes Peru S.A:
We consent to the use of our report dated July 4, 2014, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Generandes Peru S.A. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 included herein and to the reference to our firm under the heading Experts in the prospectus.
Caipo y Asociados S. Civil de R. L.
Lima, Peru
2 November 2015
Caipo y Asociados S. Civil de R.L. sociedad civil peruana de responsabilidad limitada y firma miembro de la red de firmas miembro independientes de KPMG afiliadas a KPMG International Cooperative (KPMG International), una entidad suiza. |
Inscrita en la partida N o 01681796 del Registro de Personas Juridicas de Lima. |