Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2015

or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to              

Commission file number: 001-32395

 

 

ConocoPhillips

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

Delaware   01-0562944

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

600 North Dairy Ashford, Houston, TX 77079

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

281-293-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer   x    Accelerated filer   ¨
Non-accelerated filer   ¨    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ¨     No   x

The registrant had 1,234,641,991 shares of common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding at September 30, 2015.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

CONOCOPHILLIPS

TA BLE OF CONTENTS

 

     Page  

Part I—Financial Information

  

Item 1. Financial Statements

  

Consolidated Income Statement

     1   

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

     2   

Consolidated Balance Sheet

     3   

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

     4   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

     5   

Supplementary Information—Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

     25   

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     30   

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     51   

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

     51   

Part II—Other Information

  

Item 1A. Risk Factors

     51   

Item 6. Exhibits

     52   

Signature

     53   


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

              
Consolidated Income Statement      ConocoPhillips   

 

                                                           
     Millions of Dollars  
     Three Months Ended
September 30
    Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015     2014     2015     2014  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Revenues and Other Income

        

Sales and other operating revenues

   $ 7,262        12,080        23,271        41,316   

Equity in earnings of affiliates

     223        764        686        2,008   

Gain on dispositions

     18        4        122        20   

Other income

     4        69        90        322   

 

 

Total Revenues and Other Income

     7,507        12,917        24,169        43,666   

 

 

Costs and Expenses

        

Purchased commodities

     3,269        4,703        9,736        17,325   

Production and operating expenses

     1,834        2,041        5,434        5,966   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     293        203        670        603   

Exploration expenses

     1,061        459        2,092        1,272   

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     2,271        2,096        6,731        6,058   

Impairments

     24        108        118        126   

Taxes other than income taxes

     206        493        655        1,756   

Accretion on discounted liabilities

     122        120        365        357   

Interest and debt expense

     240        149        652        475   

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

     (72     (8     (96     17   

 

 

Total Costs and Expenses

     9,248        10,364        26,357        33,955   

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

     (1,741     2,553        (2,188     9,711   

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     (685     904        (1,254     3,880   

 

 

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations

     (1,056     1,649        (934     5,831   

Income from discontinued operations*

            1,078               1,131   

 

 

Net income (loss)

     (1,056     2,727        (934     6,962   

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (15     (23     (44     (54

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ (1,071     2,704        (978     6,908   

 

 

Amounts Attributable to ConocoPhillips Common Shareholders:

        

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   $ (1,071     1,626        (978     5,777   

Income from discontinued operations

            1,078               1,131   

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ (1,071     2,704        (978     6,908   

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips Per Share of

Common Stock (dollars)

        

Basic

        

Continuing operations

   $ (0.87     1.31        (0.80     4.67   

Discontinued operations

            0.87               0.91   

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips Per Share of Common Stock

   $ (0.87     2.18        (0.80     5.58   

 

 

Diluted

        

Continuing operations

   $ (0.87     1.31        (0.80     4.63   

Discontinued operations

            0.86               0.91   

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips Per Share of Common Stock

   $ (0.87     2.17        (0.80     5.54   

 

 

Dividends Paid Per Share of Common Stock (dollars)

   $ 0.74        0.73        2.20        2.11   

 

 

Average Common Shares Outstanding (in thousands)

        

Basic

     1,242,125        1,238,234        1,241,319        1,236,431   

Diluted

     1,242,125        1,247,436        1,241,319        1,246,788   

 

 
*Net of provision (benefit) for income taxes on discontinued operations of:    $        (6            16   

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

1


Table of Contents
              
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income      ConocoPhillips   

 

                                                           
     Millions of Dollars  
     Three Months Ended
September 30
    Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015     2014     2015     2014  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

   $ (1,056     2,727        (934     6,962   

Other comprehensive income (loss)

        

Defined benefit plans

        

Prior service credit arising during the period

     163               303          

Reclassification adjustment for amortization of prior service credit included in net income (loss)

     (5     (2     (9     (5

Net actuarial loss arising during the period

     (231            (216       

Reclassification adjustment for amortization of net actuarial losses included in net income (loss)

     126        32        278        98   

Nonsponsored plans*

                          5   

Income taxes on defined benefit plans

     (18     (11     (128     (34

 

 

Defined benefit plans, net of tax

     35        19        228        64   

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     (2,544     (1,947     (4,493     (1,501

Income taxes on foreign currency translation adjustments

     25        15        42        20   

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax

     (2,519     (1,932     (4,451     (1,481

 

 

Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax

     (2,484     (1,913     (4,223     (1,417

 

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

     (3,540     814        (5,157     5,545   

Less: comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

     (15     (23     (44     (54

 

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ (3,555     791        (5,201     5,491   

 

 

*Plans for which ConocoPhillips is not the primary obligor—primarily those administered by equity affiliates.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

2


Table of Contents
              
Consolidated Balance Sheet      ConocoPhillips   

 

                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     September 30     December 31  
     2015     2014  
  

 

 

 

Assets

    

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 2,413        5,062   

Accounts and notes receivable (net of allowance of $7 million in 2015 and $5 million in 2014)

     4,332        6,675   

Accounts and notes receivable—related parties

     132        132   

Inventories

     1,143        1,331   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     1,644        1,868   

 

 

Total Current Assets

     9,664        15,068   

Investments and long-term receivables

     22,806        24,335   

Loans and advances—related parties

     696        804   

Net properties, plants and equipment (net of accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization of $74,420 million in 2015 and $70,786 million in 2014)

     71,828        75,444   

Other assets

     955        888   

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 105,949        116,539   

 

 

Liabilities

    

Accounts payable

   $ 5,173        7,982   

Accounts payable—related parties

     38        44   

Short-term debt

     175        182   

Accrued income and other taxes

     659        1,051   

Employee benefit obligations

     861        878   

Other accruals

     1,381        1,400   

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

     8,287        11,537   

Long-term debt

     24,716        22,383   

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

     10,279        10,647   

Deferred income taxes

     13,317        15,070   

Employee benefit obligations

     2,864        2,964   

Other liabilities and deferred credits

     1,931        1,665   

 

 

Total Liabilities

     61,394        64,266   

 

 

Equity

    

Common stock (2,500,000,000 shares authorized at $.01 par value)

    

Issued (2015—1,776,872,664 shares; 2014—1,773,583,368 shares)

    

Par value

     18        18   

Capital in excess of par

     46,311        46,071   

Treasury stock (at cost: 2015—542,230,673 shares; 2014—542,230,673 shares)

     (36,780     (36,780

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (6,125     (1,902

Retained earnings

     40,786        44,504   

 

 

Total Common Stockholders’ Equity

     44,210        51,911   

Noncontrolling interests

     345        362   

 

 

Total Equity

     44,555        52,273   

 

 

Total Liabilities and Equity

   $ 105,949        116,539   

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

3


Table of Contents
              
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows      ConocoPhillips   

 

                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015     2014*  
  

 

 

 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

    

Net income (loss)

   $ (934     6,962   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

    

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

     6,731        6,058   

Impairments

     118        126   

Dry hole costs and leasehold impairments

     1,238        668   

Accretion on discounted liabilities

     365        357   

Deferred taxes

     (1,284     1,024   

Undistributed equity earnings

     (79     334   

Gain on dispositions

     (122     (20

Income from discontinued operations

            (1,131

Other

     (259     (536

Working capital adjustments

    

Decrease in accounts and notes receivable

     1,913        634   

Decrease (increase) in inventories

     159        (162

Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other current assets

     255        (189

Decrease in accounts payable

     (1,618     (581

Increase (decrease) in taxes and other accruals

     (507     57   

 

 

Net cash provided by continuing operating activities

     5,976        13,601   

Net cash provided by discontinued operations

            157   

 

 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

     5,976        13,758   

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

    

Capital expenditures and investments

     (7,913     (12,729

Working capital changes associated with investing activities

     (842     394   

Proceeds from asset dispositions

     323        1,434   

Net purchases of short-term investments

            (109

Collection of advances/loans—related parties

     105        143   

Other

     298        (454

 

 

Net cash used in continuing investing activities

     (8,029     (11,321

Net cash used in discontinued operations

            (73

 

 

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities

     (8,029     (11,394

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

    

Issuance of debt

     2,498          

Repayment of debt

     (92     (505

Issuance of company common stock

     (69     27   

Dividends paid

     (2,741     (2,618

Other

     (50     (20

 

 

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities

     (454     (3,116

 

 

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents

     (142     (86

 

 

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents

     (2,649     (838

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

     5,062        6,246   

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

   $ 2,413        5,408   

 

 

*Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to current-period presentation. See Note 15–Cash Flow Information, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

4


Table of Contents
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements   ConocoPhillips

Note 1—Basis of Presentation

The interim-period financial information presented in the financial statements included in this report is unaudited and, in the opinion of management, includes all known accruals and adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position of ConocoPhillips and its results of operations and cash flows for such periods. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature unless otherwise disclosed. Certain notes and other information have been condensed or omitted from the interim financial statements included in this report. Therefore, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes included in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The results of operations for our former Nigeria business have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Unless indicated otherwise, the information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements relates to our continuing operations.

Note 2—Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)

We hold variable interests in VIEs that have not been consolidated because we are not considered the primary beneficiary. Information on our significant VIE follows:

Australia Pacific LNG Pty Ltd (APLNG)

APLNG is considered a VIE, as it has entered into certain contractual arrangements that provide it with additional forms of subordinated financial support. We are not the primary beneficiary of APLNG because we share with Origin Energy and China Petrochemical Corporation (Sinopec) the power to direct the key activities of APLNG that most significantly impact its economic performance, which involve activities related to the production and commercialization of coalbed methane, as well as liquefied natural gas (LNG) processing and export marketing. As a result, we do not consolidate APLNG, and it is accounted for as an equity method investment.

As of September 30, 2015, we have not provided any financial support to APLNG other than amounts previously contractually required. Unless we elect otherwise, we have no requirement to provide liquidity or purchase the assets of APLNG. See Note 5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, and Note 10—Guarantees, for additional information.

Note 3—Inventories

Inventories consisted of the following:

 

                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     September 30
2015
     December 31
2014
 
  

 

 

 

Crude oil and natural gas

   $ 388         538   

Materials and supplies

     755         793   

 

 
   $ 1,143         1,331   

 

 

Inventories valued on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) basis totaled $270 million and $440 million at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

 

5


Table of Contents

Note 4—Assets Held for Sale

On October 5, 2015, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell certain western Canada proved and unproved properties. The transaction is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the net carrying value of these assets was approximately $129 million, which primarily included $375 million of properties, plants and equipment (PP&E) and $235 million of asset retirement obligations.

On October 30, 2015, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell certain gas producing properties and gathering facilities in Texas and Louisiana. The transaction is expected to close late fourth quarter 2015 or early 2016. As of September 30, 2015, the net carrying value of these assets was approximately $232 million, which primarily included $358 million of PP&E and $126 million of asset retirement obligations.

Note 5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables

APLNG

APLNG’s $8.5 billion project finance facility consists of financing agreements executed by APLNG with the Export-Import Bank of the United States for approximately $2.9 billion, the Export-Import Bank of China for approximately $2.7 billion, and a syndicate of Australian and international commercial banks for approximately $2.9 billion. At September 30, 2015, $8.4 billion had been drawn from the facility. In connection with the execution of the project financing, we provided a completion guarantee for our pro-rata share of the project finance facility until the project achieves financial completion. See Note 10—Guarantees, for additional information.

APLNG is considered a VIE, as it has entered into certain contractual arrangements that provide it with additional forms of subordinated financial support. See Note 2—Variable Interest Entities (VIEs), for additional information.

At September 30, 2015, the book value of our equity method investment in APLNG was $11,530 million, net of a $1,522 million reduction due to cumulative foreign currency translation effects. The balance is included in the “Investments and long-term receivables” line on our consolidated balance sheet.

FCCL

At September 30, 2015, the book value of our equity method investment in FCCL was $8,346 million, net of a $1,667 million reduction due to cumulative foreign currency translation effects. The balance is included in the “Investments and long-term receivables” line on our consolidated balance sheet. In the first quarter of 2014, we received a $1.3 billion distribution from FCCL, which is included in the “Undistributed equity earnings” line on our consolidated statement of cash flows.

Loans and Long-Term Receivables

As part of our normal ongoing business operations and consistent with industry practice, we enter into numerous agreements with other parties to pursue business opportunities. Included in such activity are loans made to certain affiliated and non-affiliated companies. At September 30, 2015, significant loans to affiliated companies included $804 million in project financing to Qatar Liquefied Gas Company Limited (3) (QG3).

The long-term portion of these loans is included in the “Loans and advances—related parties” line on our consolidated balance sheet, while the short-term portion is in “Accounts and notes receivable—related parties.”

 

6


Table of Contents

Note 6—Suspended Wells, Unproved Property Impairments and Other Exploration Expenses

The capitalized cost of suspended wells at September 30, 2015, was $1,466 million, an increase of $167 million from $1,299 million at year-end 2014. Three suspended wells in Malaysia totaling $45 million were charged to dry hole expense during the first nine months of 2015 relating to exploratory well costs capitalized for a period greater than one year as of December 31, 2014.

In the second quarter of 2015, we decided not to pursue further evaluation of our Lebork, Damnica and Karwia concessions in Poland and Block 37 lease in Angola. Accordingly, we recorded pre-tax impairments of $93 million and $116 million, respectively, for the associated carrying value of capitalized undeveloped leasehold cost.

In the third quarter of 2015, we decided not to conduct further activity on certain Gulf of Mexico leases and to relinquish our Palangkaraya Production Sharing Contract in Indonesia. Accordingly, we recorded pre-tax impairments of $240 million and $105 million, respectively, for the associated carrying value of capitalized undeveloped leasehold cost. Additionally, in line with our July 2015 announcement of plans to reduce future deepwater exploration spending, we have recognized cancellation costs of $335 million and written off $48 million of capitalized rig costs in relation to the termination of our Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract with Ensco in the Lower 48 segment in the third quarter of 2015.

These charges are included in the “Exploration expenses” line on our consolidated income statement.

Note 7—Impairments

During the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, we recognized before-tax impairment charges within the following segments:

 

                                                           
     Millions of Dollars  
     Three Months Ended
September 30
     Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015      2014      2015      2014  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Alaska

   $ 2         3         9         3   

Lower 48

     6         102         6         119   

Europe

     9         1         96         1   

Asia Pacific and Middle East

     6                 6           

Corporate and Other

     1         2         1         3   

 

 
   $ 24         108         118         126   

 

 

The nine-month period of 2015 included impairments in our Europe segment of $96 million, primarily as a result of lower natural gas prices and reduced volume forecasts.

The three- and nine-month periods of 2014 included an impairment in our Lower 48 segment of $102 million, primarily as a result of reduced volume forecasts.

Unproved property impairments, included in the “Exploration expenses” line on our consolidated income statement, are further discussed in Note 6—Suspended Wells, Unproved Property Impairments and Other Exploration Expenses.

 

7


Table of Contents

Note 8—Debt

We have two commercial paper programs supported by our $7.0 billion revolving credit facility: the ConocoPhillips $6.1 billion program, primarily a funding source for short-term working capital needs, and the ConocoPhillips Qatar Funding Ltd. $900 million program, which is used to fund commitments relating to QG3. Commercial paper maturities are generally limited to 90 days.

At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had no direct outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility, with no letters of credit as of September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014. Under the ConocoPhillips Qatar Funding Ltd. commercial paper program, $803 million of commercial paper was outstanding at September 30, 2015, compared with $860 million at December 31, 2014. Since we had $803 million of commercial paper outstanding and had issued no letters of credit, we had access to $6.2 billion in borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility at September 30, 2015.

At September 30, 2015, we classified $695 million of short-term debt as long-term debt, based on our ability and intent to refinance the obligation on a long-term basis under our revolving credit facility.

In May 2015, we issued notes consisting of:

 

   

The $750 million of 1.50% Notes due 2018.

 

   

The $250 million of Floating Rate Notes due 2018 bearing interest at three-month LIBOR, plus 0.33%.

 

   

The $500 million of 2.20% Notes due 2020.

 

   

The $500 million of Floating Rate Notes due 2022 bearing interest at three-month LIBOR, plus 0.90%.

 

   

The $500 million of 3.35% Notes due 2025.

The net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.

Note 9—Noncontrolling Interests

Activity attributable to common stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests for the first nine months of 2015 and 2014 was as follows:

 

                                                                                         
     Millions of Dollars  
     2015     2014  
     Common
Stockholders’
Equity
    Non-
Controlling
Interest
    Total
Equity
    Common
Stockholders’
Equity
    Non-
Controlling
Interest
    Total
Equity
 
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at January 1

   $ 51,911        362        52,273        52,090        402        52,492   

Net income (loss)

     (978     44        (934     6,908        54        6,962   

Dividends

     (2,741            (2,741     (2,618            (2,618

Distributions to noncontrolling interests

            (62     (62            (69     (69

Other changes, net*

     (3,982     1        (3,981     (1,106            (1,106

 

 

Balance at September 30

   $ 44,210        345        44,555        55,274        387        55,661   

 

 

*Includes components of other comprehensive income, which are disclosed separately in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.

 

8


Table of Contents

Note 10—Guarantees

At September 30, 2015, we were liable for certain contingent obligations under various contractual arrangements as described below. We recognize a liability, at inception, for the fair value of our obligation as a guarantor for newly issued or modified guarantees. Unless the carrying amount of the liability is noted below, we have not recognized a liability because the fair value of the obligation is immaterial. In addition, unless otherwise stated, we are not currently performing with any significance under the guarantee and expect future performance to be either immaterial or have only a remote chance of occurrence.

APLNG Guarantees

At September 30, 2015, we had outstanding multiple guarantees in connection with our 37.5 percent ownership interest in APLNG. The following is a description of the guarantees with values calculated utilizing September 2015 exchange rates:

 

   

We have guaranteed APLNG’s performance with regard to a construction contract executed in connection with APLNG’s issuance of the Train 1 and Train 2 Notices to Proceed. We estimate the remaining term of this guarantee is two years. Our maximum potential amount of future payments related to this guarantee is approximately $90 million and would become payable if APLNG cancels the applicable construction contract and does not perform with respect to the amounts owed to the contractor.

 

   

We have issued a construction completion guarantee related to the third-party project financing secured by APLNG. Our maximum potential amount of future payments under the guarantee is estimated to be $3.2 billion, which could be payable if the full debt financing capacity is utilized and completion of the project is not achieved. Our guarantee of the project financing will be released upon meeting certain completion tests with milestones, which we estimate should occur beginning in 2016. Our maximum exposure at September 30, 2015, is $3.1 billion based upon our pro-rata share of the facility used at that date. At September 30, 2015, the carrying value of this guarantee is approximately $114 million.

 

   

In conjunction with our original purchase of an ownership interest in APLNG from Origin Energy in October 2008, we agreed to guarantee an existing obligation of APLNG to deliver natural gas under several sales agreements with remaining terms of 1 to 27 years. Our maximum potential amount of future payments, or cost of volume delivery, under these guarantees is estimated to be $1.1 billion ($1.9 billion in the event of intentional or reckless breach), and would become payable if APLNG fails to meet its obligations under these agreements and the obligations cannot otherwise be mitigated. Future payments are considered unlikely, as the payments, or cost of volume delivery, would only be triggered if APLNG does not have enough natural gas to meet these sales commitments and if the co-venturers do not make necessary equity contributions into APLNG.

 

   

We have guaranteed the performance of APLNG with regard to certain other contracts executed in connection with the project’s continued development. The guarantees have remaining terms of up to 30 years or the life of the venture. Our maximum potential amount of future payments related to these guarantees is approximately $160 million and would become payable if APLNG does not perform.

Other Guarantees

We have other guarantees with maximum future potential payment amounts totaling approximately $370 million, which consist primarily of guarantees of the residual value of leased corporate aircraft, a guarantee for our portion of a joint venture’s project finance reserve accounts, a guarantee to fund the short-term cash liquidity deficit of a joint venture, and a guarantee of minimum charter revenue for an LNG vessel. These guarantees have remaining terms of up to nine years or the life of the venture and would become payable if, upon sale, certain asset values are lower than guaranteed amounts, business conditions decline at guaranteed entities, or as a result of non-performance of contractual terms by guaranteed parties.

 

9


Table of Contents

Indemnifications

Over the years, we have entered into agreements to sell ownership interests in certain corporations, joint ventures and assets that gave rise to qualifying indemnifications. In addition we have entered into agreements involving leased facilities that provided for certain indemnifications. These agreements include indemnifications for taxes, environmental liabilities, employee claims, property damage, costs, fees and litigation. The terms of these indemnifications vary greatly. The majority of these indemnifications are related to environmental issues, the term is generally indefinite and the maximum amount of future payments is generally unlimited. The carrying amount recorded for these indemnifications at September 30, 2015, was approximately $90 million. We amortize the indemnification liability over the relevant time period, if one exists, based on the facts and circumstances surrounding each type of indemnity. In cases where the indemnification term is indefinite, we will reverse the liability when we have information the liability is essentially relieved or amortize the liability over an appropriate time period as the fair value of our indemnification exposure declines. Although it is reasonably possible future payments may exceed amounts recorded, due to the nature of the indemnifications, it is not possible to make a reasonable estimate of the maximum potential amount of future payments. Included in the recorded carrying amount at September 30, 2015, were approximately $40 million of environmental accruals for known contamination that are included in the “Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs” line on our consolidated balance sheet. For additional information about environmental liabilities, see Note 11—Contingencies and Commitments.

On April 30, 2012, the separation of our Downstream businesses was completed, creating two independent energy companies: ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66. In connection with the separation, we entered into an Indemnification and Release Agreement, which provides for cross-indemnities between Phillips 66 and us and established procedures for handling claims subject to indemnification and related matters. We evaluated the impact of the indemnifications given and the Phillips 66 indemnifications received as of the separation date and concluded those fair values were immaterial.

On March 1, 2015, a supplier to one of the refineries that was included in Phillips 66 as part of the separation of our Downstream businesses formally registered Phillips 66 as a party to the supply agreement, thereby triggering a guarantee we provided at the time of separation. Our maximum potential liability for future payments under this guarantee, which would become payable if Phillips 66 does not perform its contractual obligations under the supply agreement, is approximately $1.6 billion. At September 30, 2015, the carrying value of this guarantee is approximately $100 million and the remaining term is nine years. Because Phillips 66 has indemnified us for losses incurred under this guarantee, we have recorded an indemnification asset from Phillips 66 of approximately $100 million. The recorded indemnification asset amount represents the estimated fair value of the guarantee; however, if we are required to perform under the guarantee, we would expect to recover from Phillips 66 any amounts in excess of that value, provided Phillips 66 is a going concern.

Note 11—Contingencies and Commitments

A number of lawsuits involving a variety of claims arising in the ordinary course of business have been made against ConocoPhillips. We also may be required to remove or mitigate the effects on the environment of the placement, storage, disposal or release of certain chemical, mineral and petroleum substances at various active and inactive sites. We regularly assess the need for accounting recognition or disclosure of these contingencies. In the case of all known contingencies (other than those related to income taxes), we accrue a liability when the loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. If a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, then the minimum of the range is accrued. We do not reduce these liabilities for potential insurance or third-party recoveries. If applicable, we accrue receivables for probable insurance or other third-party recoveries. With respect to income-tax-related contingencies, we use a cumulative probability-weighted loss accrual in cases where sustaining a tax position is less than certain.

Based on currently available information, we believe it is remote that future costs related to known contingent liability exposures will exceed current accruals by an amount that would have a material adverse impact on our

 

10


Table of Contents

consolidated financial statements. As we learn new facts concerning contingencies, we reassess our position both with respect to accrued liabilities and other potential exposures. Estimates particularly sensitive to future changes include contingent liabilities recorded for environmental remediation, tax and legal matters. Estimated future environmental remediation costs are subject to change due to such factors as the uncertain magnitude of cleanup costs, the unknown time and extent of such remedial actions that may be required, and the determination of our liability in proportion to that of other responsible parties. Estimated future costs related to tax and legal matters are subject to change as events evolve and as additional information becomes available during the administrative and litigation processes.

Environmental

We are subject to international, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. When we prepare our consolidated financial statements, we record accruals for environmental liabilities based on management’s best estimates, using all information that is available at the time. We measure estimates and base liabilities on currently available facts, existing technology, and presently enacted laws and regulations, taking into account stakeholder and business considerations. When measuring environmental liabilities, we also consider our prior experience in remediation of contaminated sites, other companies’ cleanup experience, and data released by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or other organizations. We consider unasserted claims in our determination of environmental liabilities, and we accrue them in the period they are both probable and reasonably estimable.

Although liability of those potentially responsible for environmental remediation costs is generally joint and several for federal sites and frequently so for other sites, we are usually only one of many companies cited at a particular site. Due to the joint and several liabilities, we could be responsible for all cleanup costs related to any site at which we have been designated as a potentially responsible party. We have been successful to date in sharing cleanup costs with other financially sound companies. Many of the sites at which we are potentially responsible are still under investigation by the EPA or the agency concerned. Prior to actual cleanup, those potentially responsible normally assess the site conditions, apportion responsibility and determine the appropriate remediation. In some instances, we may have no liability or may attain a settlement of liability. Where it appears that other potentially responsible parties may be financially unable to bear their proportional share, we consider this inability in estimating our potential liability, and we adjust our accruals accordingly. As a result of various acquisitions in the past, we assumed certain environmental obligations. Some of these environmental obligations are mitigated by indemnifications made by others for our benefit and some of the indemnifications are subject to dollar limits and time limits.

We are currently participating in environmental assessments and cleanups at numerous federal Superfund and comparable state and international sites. After an assessment of environmental exposures for cleanup and other costs, we make accruals on an undiscounted basis (except those acquired in a purchase business combination, which we record on a discounted basis) for planned investigation and remediation activities for sites where it is probable future costs will be incurred and these costs can be reasonably estimated. At September 30, 2015, our balance sheet included a total environmental accrual of $286 million, compared with $344 million at December 31, 2014, for remediation activities in the United States and Canada. We expect to incur a substantial amount of these expenditures within the next 30 years. We have not reduced these accruals for possible insurance recoveries. In the future, we may be involved in additional environmental assessments, cleanups and proceedings.

Legal Proceedings

We are subject to various lawsuits and claims including but not limited to matters involving oil and gas royalty and severance tax payments, gas measurement and valuation methods, contract disputes, environmental damages, personal injury, and property damage. Our primary exposures for such matters relate to alleged royalty underpayments on certain federal, state and privately owned properties and claims of alleged environmental contamination from historic operations. We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously in these matters.

Our legal organization applies its knowledge, experience and professional judgment to the specific characteristics of our cases, employing a litigation management process to manage and monitor the legal

 

11


Table of Contents

proceedings against us. Our process facilitates the early evaluation and quantification of potential exposures in individual cases. This process also enables us to track those cases that have been scheduled for trial and/or mediation. Based on professional judgment and experience in using these litigation management tools and available information about current developments in all our cases, our legal organization regularly assesses the adequacy of current accruals and determines if adjustment of existing accruals, or establishment of new accruals, is required.

Other Contingencies

We have contingent liabilities resulting from throughput agreements with pipeline and processing companies not associated with financing arrangements. Under these agreements, we may be required to provide any such company with additional funds through advances and penalties for fees related to throughput capacity not utilized. In addition, at September 30, 2015, we had performance obligations secured by letters of credit of $388 million (issued as direct bank letters of credit) related to various purchase commitments for materials, supplies, commercial activities and services incident to the ordinary conduct of business.

In 2007, we announced we had been unable to reach agreement with respect to our migration to an empresa mixta structure mandated by the Venezuelan government’s Nationalization Decree. As a result, Venezuela’s national oil company, Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA), or its affiliates, directly assumed control over ConocoPhillips’ interests in the Petrozuata and Hamaca heavy oil ventures and the offshore Corocoro development project. In response to this expropriation, we filed a request for international arbitration on November 2, 2007, with the World Bank’s International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). An arbitration hearing was held before an ICSID tribunal during the summer of 2010. On September 3, 2013, an ICSID arbitration tribunal held that Venezuela unlawfully expropriated ConocoPhillips’ significant oil investments in June 2007. A separate arbitration phase is currently proceeding to determine the damages owed to ConocoPhillips for Venezuela’s actions. On October 10, 2014, we filed a separate arbitration under the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce against PDVSA for contractual compensation related to the Petrozuata and Hamaca heavy crude oil projects.

In 2008, Burlington Resources, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of ConocoPhillips, initiated arbitration before ICSID against The Republic of Ecuador, as a result of the newly enacted Windfall Profits Tax Law and government-mandated renegotiation of our production sharing contracts. Despite a restraining order issued by the ICSID tribunal, Ecuador confiscated the crude oil production of Burlington and its co-venturer and sold the seized crude oil. In 2009, Ecuador took over operations in Blocks 7 and 21, fully expropriating our assets. In June 2010, the ICSID tribunal concluded it has jurisdiction to hear the expropriation claim. On April 24, 2012, Ecuador filed supplemental counterclaims asserting environmental damages, which we believe are not material. The ICSID tribunal issued a decision on liability on December 14, 2012, in favor of Burlington, finding that Ecuador’s seizure of Blocks 7 and 21 was an unlawful expropriation in violation of the Ecuador-U.S. Bilateral Investment Treaty. An additional arbitration phase is now proceeding to determine the damages owed to ConocoPhillips for Ecuador’s actions and to address Ecuador’s counterclaims.

ConocoPhillips served a Notice of Arbitration on the Timor-Leste Minister of Finance in October 2012 for outstanding disputes related to a series of tax assessments. As of September 30, 2015, ConocoPhillips has paid, under protest, tax assessments totaling approximately $237 million, which are primarily recorded in the “Investments and long-term receivables” line on our consolidated balance sheet. The arbitration hearing was conducted in Singapore in June 2014 under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Laws (UNCITRAL) arbitration rules, pursuant to the terms of the Tax Stability Agreement with the Timor-Leste government. Post-hearing briefs from both parties were filed in August 2014. We are now awaiting the Tribunal’s decision. Future impacts on our business are not known at this time.

 

12


Table of Contents

Note 12—Derivative and Financial Instruments

Derivative Instruments

We use futures, forwards, swaps and options in various markets to meet our customer needs and capture market opportunities. Our commodity business primarily consists of natural gas, crude oil, bitumen, LNG and natural gas liquids.

Our derivative instruments are held at fair value on our consolidated balance sheet. Where these balances have the right of setoff, they are presented on a net basis. Related cash flows are recorded as operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows. On our consolidated income statement, realized and unrealized gains and losses are recognized either on a gross basis if directly related to our physical business or a net basis if held for trading. Gains and losses related to contracts that meet and are designated with the normal purchase normal sale exception are recognized upon settlement. We generally apply this exception to eligible crude contracts. We do not use hedge accounting for our commodity derivatives.

The following table presents the gross fair values of our commodity derivatives, excluding collateral, and the line items where they appear on our consolidated balance sheet:

 

                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     September 30
2015
     December 31
2014
 
  

 

 

 

Assets

     

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   $ 1,532         4,500   

Other assets

     78         157   

Liabilities

     

Other accruals

     1,553         4,426   

Other liabilities and deferred credits

     68         144   

 

 

The gains (losses) from commodity derivatives incurred, and the line items where they appear on our consolidated income statement were:

 

                                                           
     Millions of Dollars  
     Three Months Ended
September 30
    Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015     2014     2015     2014  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Sales and other operating revenues

   $ 89        (185     117        236   

Other income

            1        1        3   

Purchased commodities

     (85     163        (88     (221

 

 

The table below summarizes our material net exposures resulting from outstanding commodity derivative contracts:

 

                             
     Open Position
Long/(Short)
 
     September 30
2015
    December 31
2014
 
  

 

 

 

Commodity

    

Natural gas and power (billions of cubic feet equivalent)

    

Fixed price

     (17     (11

Basis

     (18     18   

 

 

 

13


Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Exchange Derivatives

We have foreign currency exchange rate risk resulting from international operations. Our foreign currency exchange derivative activity primarily relates to managing our cash-related and foreign currency exchange rate exposures, such as firm commitments for capital programs or local currency tax payments, dividends, and cash returns from net investments in foreign affiliates. We do not elect hedge accounting on our foreign currency exchange derivatives.

The following table presents the gross fair values of our foreign currency exchange derivatives, excluding collateral, and the line items where they appear on our consolidated balance sheet:

 

                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     September 30
2015
     December 31
2014
 
  

 

 

 

Assets

     

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

   $ 40         1   

Liabilities

     

Other accruals

     3         1   

 

 

The (gains) losses from foreign currency exchange derivatives incurred, and the line item where they appear on our consolidated income statement were:

 

                                                           
     Millions of Dollars  
     Three Months Ended
September 30
     Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015     2014      2015     2014  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

   $ (17     5         (30     (2

 

 

We had the following net notional position of outstanding foreign currency exchange derivatives:

 

                                            
     In Millions
Notional Currency
 
     September 30
2015
     December 31
2014
 
  

 

 

Sell U.S. dollar, buy other currencies*

   USD              7   

Buy U.S. dollar, sell other currencies**

   USD      18         44   

Buy British pound, sell other currencies***

   GBP      472         20   

 

 
    * Primarily Canadian dollar.
  ** Primarily Canadian dollar and Norwegian krone.
*** Primarily Canadian dollar and euro.

Financial Instruments

We have certain financial instruments on our consolidated balance sheet related to interest-bearing time deposits and commercial paper. These held-to-maturity financial instruments are included in “Cash and cash equivalents” on our consolidated balance sheet if the maturities at the time we made the investments were 90 days or less.

 

14


Table of Contents
                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     Carrying Amount  
     Cash and Cash Equivalents  
     September 30
2015
     December 31
2014
 
  

 

 

 

Cash

   $ 546         946   

Money Market Funds

             50   

Time deposits

     

Remaining maturities from 1 to 90 days

     1,867         3,726   

Commercial paper

     

Remaining maturities from 1 to 90 days

             340   

 

 
   $ 2,413         5,062   

 

 

Credit Risk

Financial instruments potentially exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, over-the-counter (OTC) derivative contracts and trade receivables. Our cash equivalents are placed in high-quality commercial paper, money market funds, government debt securities and time deposits with major international banks and financial institutions.

The credit risk from our OTC derivative contracts, such as forwards and swaps, derives from the counterparty to the transaction. Individual counterparty exposure is managed within predetermined credit limits and includes the use of cash-call margins when appropriate, thereby reducing the risk of significant nonperformance. We also use futures, swaps and option contracts that have a negligible credit risk because these trades are cleared with an exchange clearinghouse and subject to mandatory margin requirements until settled; however, we are exposed to the credit risk of those exchange brokers for receivables arising from daily margin cash calls, as well as for cash deposited to meet initial margin requirements.

Our trade receivables result primarily from our petroleum operations and reflect a broad national and international customer base, which limits our exposure to concentrations of credit risk. The majority of these receivables have payment terms of 30 days or less, and we continually monitor this exposure and the creditworthiness of the counterparties. We do not generally require collateral to limit the exposure to loss; however, we will sometimes use letters of credit, prepayments and master netting arrangements to mitigate credit risk with counterparties that both buy from and sell to us, as these agreements permit the amounts owed by us or owed to others to be offset against amounts due us.

Certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to post collateral if the derivative exposure exceeds a threshold amount. We have contracts with fixed threshold amounts and other contracts with variable threshold amounts that are contingent on our credit rating. The variable threshold amounts typically decline for lower credit ratings, while both the variable and fixed threshold amounts typically revert to zero if we fall below investment grade. Cash is the primary collateral in all contracts; however, many also permit us to post letters of credit as collateral, such as transactions administered through the New York Mercantile Exchange.

The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with such credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, was $122 million and $150 million, respectively. For these instruments, no collateral was posted as of September 30, 2015 or December 31, 2014. If our credit rating had been lowered one level from its “A” rating (per Standard and Poor’s) on September 30, 2015, we would be required to post no additional collateral to our counterparties. If we had been downgraded below investment grade, we would be required to post $122 million of additional collateral, either with cash or letters of credit.

 

15


Table of Contents

Note 13—Fair Value Measurement

We carry a portion of our assets and liabilities at fair value that are measured at a reporting date using an exit price (i.e., the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability) and disclosed according to the quality of valuation inputs under the following hierarchy:

 

   

Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in an active market for identical assets or liabilities.

 

   

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable.

 

   

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are significant to the fair value of assets or liabilities.

The classification of an asset or liability is based on the lowest level of input significant to its fair value. Those that are initially classified as Level 3 are subsequently reported as Level 2 when the fair value derived from unobservable inputs is inconsequential to the overall fair value, or if corroborated market data becomes available. Assets and liabilities that are initially reported as Level 2 are subsequently reported as Level 3 if corroborated market data is no longer available. Transfers occur at the end of the reporting period. There were no material transfers in or out of Level 1 during 2015 or 2014.

Recurring Fair Value Measurement

Financial assets and liabilities reported at fair value on a recurring basis primarily include commodity derivatives and certain investments to support nonqualified deferred compensation plans. The deferred compensation investments are measured at fair value using unadjusted prices available from national securities exchanges; therefore, these assets are categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Level 1 derivative assets and liabilities primarily represent exchange-traded futures and options that are valued using unadjusted prices available from the underlying exchange. Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities primarily represent OTC swaps, options and forward purchase and sale contracts that are valued using adjusted exchange prices, prices provided by brokers or pricing service companies that are all corroborated by market data. Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities consist of OTC swaps, options and forward purchase and sale contracts that are long term in nature and where a significant portion of fair value is calculated from underlying market data that is not readily available. The derived value uses industry standard methodologies that may consider the historical relationships among various commodities, modeled market prices, time value, volatility factors and other relevant economic measures. The use of these inputs results in management’s best estimate of fair value. Level 3 activity was not material for all periods presented.

The following table summarizes the fair value hierarchy for gross financial assets and liabilities (i.e., unadjusted where the right of setoff exists for commodity derivatives accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis):

 

                                                                                                                       
     Millions of Dollars  
     September 30, 2015      December 31, 2014  
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Assets

                       

Deferred compensation investments

   $ 22                         22         297                         297   

Commodity derivatives

     1,344         198         68         1,610         4,221         361         75         4,657   

 

 

Total assets

   $ 1,366         198         68         1,632         4,518         361         75         4,954   

 

 

Liabilities

                       

Commodity derivatives

   $ 1,378         228         15         1,621         4,200         354         16         4,570   

 

 

Total liabilities

   $ 1,378         228         15         1,621         4,200         354         16         4,570   

 

 

 

16


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes those commodity derivative balances subject to the right of setoff as presented on our consolidated balance sheet. We have elected to offset the recognized fair value amounts for multiple derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty in our financial statements when a legal right of offset exists.

 

                                                                                         
     Millions of Dollars  
     Gross      Gross      Net             Gross Amounts         
     Amounts      Amounts      Amounts      Cash      without      Net  
     Recognized      Offset      Presented      Collateral      Right of Setoff      Amounts  
  

 

 

 

September 30, 2015

                 

Assets

   $ 1,610         1,435         175                 17         158   

Liabilities

     1,621         1,435         186         32         9         145   

 

 

December 31, 2014

                 

Assets

   $ 4,657         4,352         305         8         28         269   

Liabilities

     4,570         4,352         218         4         22         192   

 

 

At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we did not present any amounts gross on our consolidated balance sheet where we had the right of setoff.

Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurement

The following table summarizes the fair value hierarchy by major category for assets accounted for at fair value on a non-recurring basis:

 

                                            
     Millions of Dollars  
            Fair Value
Measurements Using
 
     Fair Value *      Level 3
Inputs
     Before-
Tax Loss
 
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

September 30, 2015

        

Net PP&E (held for use)

   $ 42         42         86   

Net PP&E (unproved property)

     104         104         240   

 

 

*Represents the fair value at the time of the impairment.

Net PP&E held for use is comprised of various producing properties impaired to their individual fair values less costs to sell. The fair values were determined by internal discounted cash flow models using estimates of future production, prices from futures exchanges and pricing service companies, costs, and a discount rate believed to be consistent with those used by principal market participants.

Net PP&E unproved property is comprised of unproved leaseholds impaired to our best estimate of sales value less costs to sell.

Reported Fair Values of Financial Instruments

We used the following methods and assumptions to estimate the fair value of financial instruments:

 

   

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amount reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value.

   

Accounts and notes receivable (including long-term and related parties): The carrying amount reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value. The valuation technique and methods used to estimate the fair value of the current portion of fixed-rate related party loans is consistent with Loans and advances—related parties.

 

17


Table of Contents
   

Loans and advances—related parties: The carrying amount of floating-rate loans approximates fair value. The fair value of fixed-rate loan activity is measured using market observable data and is categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, for additional information.

   

Accounts payable (including related parties) and floating-rate debt: The carrying amount of accounts payable and floating-rate debt reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value.

   

Fixed-rate debt: The estimated fair value of fixed-rate debt is measured using prices available from a pricing service that is corroborated by market data; therefore, these liabilities are categorized as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

The following table summarizes the net fair value of financial instruments (i.e., adjusted where the right of setoff exists for commodity derivatives):

 

                                                           
     Millions of Dollars  
     Carrying Amount      Fair Value  
     September 30      December 31      September 30      December 31  
     2015      2014      2015      2014  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Financial assets

           

Deferred compensation investments

   $ 22         297         22         297   

Commodity derivatives

     175         297         175         297   

Total loans and advances—related parties

     805         913         805         913   

Financial liabilities

           

Total debt, excluding capital leases

     24,063         21,707         26,460         25,191   

Commodity derivatives

     154         214         154         214   

 

 

Deferred compensation investments

In May 2015, we liquidated certain deferred compensation investments for proceeds of $267 million, which is included in the “Other” line within “Cash Flows From Investing Activities” on our consolidated statement of cash flows.

Note 14—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the equity section of our consolidated balance sheet included:

 

                                            
     Millions of Dollars  
     Defined
Benefit Plans
    Foreign
Currency
Translation
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 
  

 

 

 

December 31, 2014

   $ (1,261     (641     (1,902

Other comprehensive income (loss)

     228        (4,451     (4,223

 

 

September 30, 2015

   $ (1,033     (5,092     (6,125

 

 

Foreign Currency Translation decreased due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar, Australian dollar and Norwegian krone.

There were no items within accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to noncontrolling interests.

 

18


Table of Contents

The following table summarizes reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income:

 

                                                           
     Millions of Dollars  
     Three Months Ended
September 30
     Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015      2014      2015      2014  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Defined benefit plans

   $ 77         19         173         59   

 

 
Above amounts are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost and are presented net of tax expense of:    $ 44         11         96         34   

See Note 16 Employee Benefit Plans, for additional information.

Note 15—Cash Flow Information

 

                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015      2014  
  

 

 

 

Cash Payments

     

Interest

   $ 633         491   

Income taxes*

     376         3,359   

 

 

Net Purchases of Short-Term Investments

     

Short-term investments purchased

   $         (876

Short-term investments sold

             767   

 

 
   $         (109

 

 

*Net of $556 million in 2015 related to a refund received from the Internal Revenue Service for 2014 overpaid taxes.

In relation to certain working capital changes associated with investing activities, we reclassified $394 million of the “Decrease in accounts payable” line within “Cash Flows From Operating Activities” to the “Working capital changes associated with investing activities” line within “Cash Flows From Investing Activities” for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. There was no impact to “Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period.”

 

19


Table of Contents

Note 16—Employee Benefit Plans

Pension and Postretirement Plans

 

                                                                                         
     Millions of Dollars  
     Pension Benefits     Other Benefits  
     2015     2014     2015     2014  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     U.S.     Int’l.     U.S.     Int’l.              
  

 

 

     

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost

            

Three Months Ended September 30

            

Service cost

   $ 36        31        31        27        2        1   

Interest cost

     41        34        42        42        5        8   

Expected return on plan assets

     (50     (44     (53     (45              

Amortization of prior service cost (credit)

     1        (1     1        (2     (6     (1

Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)

     27        20        19        14               (1

Settlements

     79                                      

Curtailment loss

     35                                      

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 169        40        40        36        1        7   

 

 

Nine Months Ended September 30

            

Service cost

   $ 108        94        93        83        3        2   

Interest cost

     120        102        124        126        19        22   

Expected return on plan assets

     (157     (131     (159     (137              

Amortization of prior service cost (credit)

     4        (5     4        (6     (9     (3

Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)

     84        62        57        43        1        (2

Settlements

     131                                      

Curtailment loss

     35                                      

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 325        122        119        109        14        19   

 

 

During the first nine months of 2015, we contributed $65 million to our domestic benefit plans and $83 million to our international benefit plans. In 2015, we expect to contribute approximately $100 million to our domestic qualified and nonqualified pension and postretirement benefit plans and $120 million to our international qualified and nonqualified pension and postretirement benefit plans.

We recognized a proportionate share of prior actuarial losses from other comprehensive income as pension settlement expense of $79 million and $131 million for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, respectively, related to the U.S. qualified pension plan and certain U.S. nonqualified supplemental retirement plans.

As part of the ongoing restructuring program in the United States, we concluded that actions taken during the three-month period ended September 30, 2015, would result in a significant reduction of future services of active employees in the U.S. qualified pension plan and a U.S. nonqualified supplemental retirement plan. As a result, we recognized an increase in the benefit obligation and a proportionate share of prior service cost from other comprehensive income as a curtailment loss of $35 million on the U.S. qualified pension plan during the three-month period ended September 30, 2015.

In conjunction with the significant reduction of active employees, the net pension benefit obligation of the U.S. qualified pension plan was remeasured. At the measurement date, the net pension liability increased by $181 million to $876 million, resulting in a corresponding decrease to other comprehensive income. Additionally, the pension benefit obligation of a U.S. nonqualified supplemental retirement plan was remeasured. At the measurement date, the pension benefit obligation increased $53 million to $472 million, resulting in a corresponding decrease in other comprehensive income.

 

20


Table of Contents

During the three-month period ended September 30, 2015, there was an amendment to the U.S. other postretirement benefit plan. The benefit obligation decreased by $163 million for changes in the plan made to retiree medical benefits. The $163 million decrease consists of $149 million related to the discontinuation of all company premium cost-sharing contributions to the post-65 retiree medical plan after December 31, 2025, and $14 million associated with new participants in the post-65 retiree medical plan after December 31, 2015, no longer being eligible for any company premium cost-sharing contributions. In conjunction with the recognition of the changes in the amendment, the benefit obligation was remeasured but did not result in additional significant change.

During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015, in addition to the amendment to the U.S. other postretirement benefit plan described above, there was an amendment made to retiree medical benefits that resulted in a decrease of the benefit obligation by $140 million. This decrease consists of $91 million related to cost sharing changes for retirees and $49 million associated with excluding employees and retirees of Phillips 66 who were not enrolled in a ConocoPhillips retiree medical plan as of July 1, 2015. The measurements of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for the post-65 retiree medical plan assumed a health care cost trend rate of 2 percent in 2015 that increases to 5 percent in 2018.

Due to an ongoing restructuring program in the Europe segment, we recognized additional expense of $15 million and $75 million, respectively, during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, associated with employee special termination benefits, of which approximately 62 percent is expected to be recovered from joint venture partners.

Severance Accrual

As a result of the current business environment’s impact on our operating and capital plans, a reduction in our overall employee workforce is ongoing during 2015. Severance accruals of $202 million and $290 million were recorded during the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The following table summarizes our severance accrual activity for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015:

 

              
      Millions of Dollars   

Balance at December 31, 2014

   $ 61   

Accruals

     290   

Accrual reversals

     (2

Benefit payments

     (99

Foreign currency translation adjustments

     (6

 

 

Balance at September 30, 2015

   $ 244   

 

 

Of the remaining balance at September 30, 2015, $201 million is classified as short-term.

 

21


Table of Contents

Note 17—Related Party Transactions

We consider our equity method investments to be related parties. Significant transactions with related parties were:

 

                                                           
     Millions of Dollars  
     Three Months Ended
September 30
    Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015     2014     2015     2014  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating revenues and other income

   $ 28        32        80        89   

Purchases

     25        47        72        147   

Operating expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses

     18        21        53        53   

Net interest income*

     (3     (12     (7     (36

 

 

*We paid interest to, or received interest from, various affiliates. See Note 5—Investments, Loans and Long-Term Receivables, for additional information on loans to affiliated companies.

Note 18—Segment Disclosures and Related Information

We explore for, produce, transport and market crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids on a worldwide basis. We manage our operations through six operating segments, which are primarily defined by geographic region: Alaska, Lower 48, Canada, Europe, Asia Pacific and Middle East, and Other International.

After agreeing to sell our Nigeria business in 2012, we completed the sale in the third quarter of 2014. Results for these operations have been reported as discontinued operations in all periods presented.

Corporate and Other represents costs not directly associated with an operating segment, such as most interest expense, corporate overhead and certain technology activities, including licensing revenues. Corporate assets include all cash and cash equivalents.

We evaluate performance and allocate resources based on net income attributable to ConocoPhillips. Intersegment sales are at prices that approximate market.

Effective November 1, 2015, the Other International and Europe segments will be restructured to align with changes to our internal organization structure. The Libya business will be moved from the Other International segment to the Europe segment, which will be renamed Europe and North Africa. Accordingly, results of operations for the Other International and Europe segments will be revised for current and prior periods beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015. There is no expected impact on our consolidated financial statements, and the impact on our segment presentation is expected to be immaterial.

 

22


Table of Contents

Analysis of Results by Operating Segment

 

                                                           
     Millions of Dollars  
     Three Months Ended
September 30
    Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015     2014     2015     2014  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Sales and Other Operating Revenues

        

Alaska

   $ 1,067        2,094        3,455        6,687   

 

 

Lower 48

     3,106        5,082        9,421        17,196   

Intersegment eliminations

     (15     (28     (50     (88

 

 

Lower 48

     3,091        5,054        9,371        17,108   

 

 

Canada

     576        1,086        1,932        4,113   

Intersegment eliminations

     (76     (128     (265     (618

 

 

Canada

     500        958        1,667        3,495   

 

 

Europe

     1,480        2,241        4,809        8,195   

Intersegment eliminations

     (2     (3     (3     (47

 

 

Europe

     1,478        2,238        4,806        8,148   

 

 

Asia Pacific and Middle East

     1,074        1,658        3,748        5,758   

Other International

            60        (5     65   

Corporate and Other

     52        18        229        55   

 

 

Consolidated sales and other operating revenues

   $ 7,262        12,080        23,271        41,316   

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

        

Alaska

   $ 53        473        393        1,698   

Lower 48

     (852     32        (1,550     621   

Canada

     (145     307        (469     845   

Europe

     (4     213        670        819   

Asia Pacific and Middle East

     258        749        981        2,336   

Other International

     (43     (18     (284     74   

Corporate and Other

     (338     (130     (719     (616

Discontinued operations

            1,078               1,131   

 

 

Consolidated net income (loss) attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ (1,071     2,704        (978     6,908   

 

 

 

                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     September 30
2015
     December 31
2014
 
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Assets

     

Alaska

   $ 13,212         12,655   

Lower 48

     28,629         30,185   

Canada

     18,999         21,764   

Europe

     14,269         16,125   

Asia Pacific and Middle East

     24,114         25,976   

Other International

     1,674         1,961   

Corporate and Other

     5,052         7,815   

Discontinued operations

             58   

 

 

Consolidated total assets

   $ 105,949         116,539   

 

 

 

23


Table of Contents

Note 19—Income Taxes

Our effective tax rates from continuing operations for the third quarter and first nine months of 2015 were 39 percent and 57 percent, respectively, compared with 35 percent and 40 percent for the same periods of 2014. The increase in the effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2015 was primarily due to the absence of the effects of our election of the fair market value method of apportioning interest expense in the third quarter of 2014. The increase in the effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2015 was primarily due to our overall pre-tax loss position; the effect of the first quarter 2015 U.K. tax law change generating a tax benefit, discussed below; the absence of our election of the fair market value method of apportioning interest expense in the third quarter of 2014; and pre-tax losses in low tax jurisdictions. These items were partially offset by the second quarter 2015 Canadian tax law change, discussed below, and pre-tax income in high tax jurisdictions.

In the United Kingdom, legislation was enacted on March 26, 2015, to decrease the overall U.K. upstream corporation tax rate from 62 percent to 50 percent effective January 1, 2015. As a result, a $555 million net tax benefit for revaluing the U.K. deferred tax liability is reflected in the “Provision (benefit) for income taxes” line on our consolidated income statement.

In Canada, legislation was enacted on June 29, 2015, to increase the overall Canadian corporation tax rate from 25 percent to 27 percent effective July 1, 2015. As a result, a $129 million net tax expense for revaluing the Canadian deferred tax liability is reflected in the “Provision (benefit) for income taxes” line on our consolidated income statement.

Note 20—New Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU No. 2014-09), which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition,” and most industry-specific guidance. This ASU sets forth a five-step model for determining when and how revenue is recognized. Under the model, an entity will be required to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. Additional disclosures will be required to describe the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, “Deferral of the Effective Date,” which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09. The ASU is now effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Entities may choose to adopt the standard using either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this ASU.

In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, “Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis,” which amends existing requirements applicable to reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether certain legal entities should be consolidated. The ASU is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may choose to adopt the standard using either a full retrospective approach or a modified retrospective approach. We do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

 

24


Table of Contents

Supplementary Information—Condensed Consolidating Financial Information

We have various cross guarantees among ConocoPhillips, ConocoPhillips Company and ConocoPhillips Canada Funding Company I, with respect to publicly held debt securities. ConocoPhillips Company is 100 percent owned by ConocoPhillips. ConocoPhillips Canada Funding Company I is an indirect, 100 percent owned subsidiary of ConocoPhillips Company. ConocoPhillips and ConocoPhillips Company have fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment obligations of ConocoPhillips Canada Funding Company I, with respect to its publicly held debt securities. Similarly, ConocoPhillips has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment obligations of ConocoPhillips Company with respect to its publicly held debt securities. In addition, ConocoPhillips Company has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the payment obligations of ConocoPhillips with respect to its publicly held debt securities. All guarantees are joint and several. The following condensed consolidating financial information presents the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for:

 

   

ConocoPhillips, ConocoPhillips Company and ConocoPhillips Canada Funding Company I (in each case, reflecting investments in subsidiaries utilizing the equity method of accounting).

   

All other nonguarantor subsidiaries of ConocoPhillips.

   

The consolidating adjustments necessary to present ConocoPhillips’ results on a consolidated basis.

This condensed consolidating financial information should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes.

In April 2015, ConocoPhillips received a $2 billion return of capital from ConocoPhillips Company to settle certain accumulated intercompany balances. The transaction had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

25


Table of Contents
                                                                                         
     Millions of Dollars  
     Three Months Ended September 30, 2015  
Income Statement    ConocoPhillips     ConocoPhillips
Company
    ConocoPhillips
Canada
Funding
Company I
    All Other
Subsidiaries
    Consolidating
Adjustments
    Total
Consolidated
 

Revenues and Other Income

            

Sales and other operating revenues

   $        2,954               4,308               7,262   

Equity in earnings of affiliates

     (973     (19            559        656        223   

Gain on dispositions

            5               13               18   

Other income (loss)

     (1     (8            13               4   

Intercompany revenues

     19        81        60        862        (1,022       

 

 

Total Revenues and Other Income

     (955     3,013        60        5,755        (366     7,507   

 

 

Costs and Expenses

            

Purchased commodities

            2,623               1,501        (855     3,269   

Production and operating expenses

            390               1,447        (3     1,834   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     1        239               53               293   

Exploration expenses

            761               300               1,061   

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

            322               1,949               2,271   

Impairments

            1               23               24   

Taxes other than income taxes

            38               168               206   

Accretion on discounted liabilities

            14               108               122   

Interest and debt expense

     121        113        57        113        (164     240   

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

     47               (359     240               (72

 

 

Total Costs and Expenses

     169        4,501        (302     5,902        (1,022     9,248   

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

     (1,124     (1,488     362        (147     656        (1,741

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     (53     (515     27        (144            (685

 

 

Net income (loss)

     (1,071     (973     335        (3     656        (1,056

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                          (15            (15

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ (1,071     (973     335        (18     656        (1,071

 

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ (3,555     (3,457     70        (2,507     5,894        (3,555

 

 
Income Statement    Three Months Ended September 30, 2014  

Revenues and Other Income

            

Sales and other operating revenues

   $        4,672               7,408               12,080   

Equity in earnings of affiliates

     1,722        2,098               975        (4,031     764   

Gain on dispositions

            2               2               4   

Other income

     1        15               53               69   

Intercompany revenues

     20        104        72        1,444        (1,640       

 

 

Total Revenues and Other Income

     1,743        6,891        72        9,882        (5,671     12,917   

 

 

Costs and Expenses

            

Purchased commodities

            4,036               2,139        (1,472     4,703   

Production and operating expenses

            414               1,617        10        2,041   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     2        136        1        65        (1     203   

Exploration expenses

            331               128               459   

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

            273               1,823               2,096   

Impairments

            104               4               108   

Taxes other than income taxes

            69               424               493   

Accretion on discounted liabilities

            14               106               120   

Interest and debt expense

     134        77        58        57        (177     149   

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

     33        3        (208     164               (8

 

 

Total Costs and Expenses

     169        5,457        (149     6,527        (1,640     10,364   

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     1,574        1,434        221        3,355        (4,031     2,553   

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     (52     (288     9        1,235               904   

 

 

Income From Continuing Operations

     1,626        1,722        212        2,120        (4,031     1,649   

Income from discontinued operations

     1,078        1,078               61        (1,139     1,078   

 

 

Net income

     2,704        2,800        212        2,181        (5,170     2,727   

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                          (23            (23

 

 

Net Income Attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ 2,704        2,800        212        2,158        (5,170     2,704   

 

 

Comprehensive Income Attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ 791        887        29        255        (1,171     791   

 

 

 

26


Table of Contents
                                                                                         
     Millions of Dollars  
     Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015  
Income Statement    ConocoPhillips     ConocoPhillips
Company
    ConocoPhillips
Canada

Funding
Company I
    All Other
Subsidiaries
    Consolidating
Adjustments
    Total
Consolidated
 

Revenues and Other Income

            

Sales and other operating revenues

   $        8,989               14,282               23,271   

Equity in earnings of affiliates

     (712     1,009               1,275        (886     686   

Gain on dispositions

            38               84               122   

Other income (loss)

     (1     9               82               90   

Intercompany revenues

     56        261        187        2,657        (3,161       

 

 

Total Revenues and Other Income

     (657     10,306        187        18,380        (4,047     24,169   

 

 

Costs and Expenses

            

Purchased commodities

            7,751               4,605        (2,620     9,736   

Production and operating expenses

            1,185               4,286        (37     5,434   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     7        521               151        (9     670   

Exploration expenses

            1,104               988               2,092   

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

            882               5,849               6,731   

Impairments

            1               117               118   

Taxes other than income taxes

            157               498               655   

Accretion on discounted liabilities

            43               322               365   

Interest and debt expense

     363        325        171        288        (495     652   

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

     94               (591     401               (96

 

 

Total Costs and Expenses

     464        11,969        (420     17,505        (3,161     26,357   

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

     (1,121     (1,663     607        875        (886     (2,188

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     (143     (951     18        (178            (1,254

 

 

Net income (loss)

     (978     (712     589        1,053        (886     (934

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                          (44            (44

 

 

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ (978     (712     589        1,009        (886     (978

 

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss) Attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ (5,201     (4,935     67        (3,393     8,261        (5,201

 

 
Income Statement    Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014  

Revenues and Other Income

            

Sales and other operating revenues

   $        15,920               25,396               41,316   

Equity in earnings of affiliates

     6,053        7,063               2,235        (13,343     2,008   

Gain on dispositions

            3               17               20   

Other income

     1        60               261               322   

Intercompany revenues

     59        369        214        4,685        (5,327       

 

 

Total Revenues and Other Income

     6,113        23,415        214        32,594        (18,670     43,666   

 

 

Costs and Expenses

            

Purchased commodities

            13,984               8,060        (4,719     17,325   

Production and operating expenses

            1,255               4,751        (40     5,966   

Selling, general and administrative expenses

     8        416        1        193        (15     603   

Exploration expenses

            713               559               1,272   

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

            776               5,282               6,058   

Impairments

            122               4               126   

Taxes other than income taxes

            233               1,523               1,756   

Accretion on discounted liabilities

            43               314               357   

Interest and debt expense

     441        209        174        204        (553     475   

Foreign currency transaction (gains) losses

     36        5        (196     172               17   

 

 

Total Costs and Expenses

     485        17,756        (21     21,062        (5,327     33,955   

 

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

     5,628        5,659        235        11,532        (13,343     9,711   

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

     (149     (394     7        4,416               3,880   

 

 

Income From Continuing Operations

     5,777        6,053        228        7,116        (13,343     5,831   

Income from discontinued operations

     1,131        1,131               114        (1,245     1,131   

 

 

Net income

     6,908        7,184        228        7,230        (14,588     6,962   

Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

                          (54            (54

 

 

Net Income Attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ 6,908        7,184        228        7,176        (14,588     6,908   

 

 

Comprehensive Income Attributable to ConocoPhillips

   $ 5,491        5,767        24        5,730        (11,521     5,491   

 

 

 

27


Table of Contents
                                                                                         
     Millions of Dollars  
     September 30, 2015  
Balance Sheet    ConocoPhillips     ConocoPhillips
Company
     ConocoPhillips
Canada
Funding
Company I
    All Other
Subsidiaries
     Consolidating
Adjustments
    Total
Consolidated
 

Assets

              

Cash and cash equivalents

   $        23         9        2,381                2,413   

Accounts and notes receivable

     16        1,794         22        6,886         (4,254     4,464   

Inventories

            158                985                1,143   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     1        716         27        944         (44     1,644   

 

 

Total Current Assets

     17        2,691         58        11,196         (4,298     9,664   

Investments, loans and long-term receivables*

     48,575        68,865         3,630        29,886         (127,454     23,502   

Net properties, plants and equipment

            9,558                62,270                71,828   

Other assets

     8        221         422        1,098         (794     955   

 

 

Total Assets

   $ 48,600        81,335         4,110        104,450         (132,546     105,949   

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

              

Accounts payable

   $        5,021         16        4,428         (4,254     5,211   

Short-term debt

     (9     1         5        178                175   

Accrued income and other taxes

            118                541                659   

Employee benefit obligations

            618                243                861   

Other accruals

     101        487         79        758         (44     1,381   

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

     92        6,245         100        6,148         (4,298     8,287   

Long-term debt

     7,516        10,660         2,967        3,573                24,716   

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

            1,300                8,979                10,279   

Deferred income taxes

                           13,398         (81     13,317   

Employee benefit obligations

            2,058                806                2,864   

Other liabilities and deferred credits*

     3,342        7,409         964        16,115         (25,899     1,931   

 

 

Total Liabilities

     10,950        27,672         4,031        49,019         (30,278     61,394   

Retained earnings

     34,265        20,734         (506     18,231         (31,938     40,786   

Other common stockholders’ equity

     3,385        32,929         585        36,855         (70,330     3,424   

Noncontrolling interests

                           345                345   

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

   $ 48,600        81,335         4,110        104,450         (132,546     105,949   

 

 

*Includes intercompany loans.

              
Balance Sheet    December 31, 2014  

Assets

              

Cash and cash equivalents

   $        770         7        4,285                5,062   

Accounts and notes receivable

     20        2,813         22        6,671         (2,719     6,807   

Inventories

            281                1,050                1,331   

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

     6        754         15        1,138         (45     1,868   

 

 

Total Current Assets

     26        4,618         44        13,144         (2,764     15,068   

Investments, loans and long-term receivables*

     55,568        70,732         3,965        32,467         (137,593     25,139   

Net properties, plants and equipment

            9,730                65,714                75,444   

Other assets

     40        67         208        1,338         (765     888   

 

 

Total Assets

     55,634        85,147         4,217        112,663         (141,122     116,539   

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

              

Accounts payable

     1        4,149         14        6,581         (2,719     8,026   

Short-term debt

     (5     6         5        176                182   

Accrued income and other taxes

            117                934                1,051   

Employee benefit obligations

            595                283                878   

Other accruals

     170        337         71        868         (46     1,400   

 

 

Total Current Liabilities

     166        5,204         90        8,842         (2,765     11,537   

Long-term debt

     7,541        8,197         2,974        3,671                22,383   

Asset retirement obligations and accrued environmental costs

            1,328                9,319                10,647   

Deferred income taxes

            265                14,811         (6     15,070   

Employee benefit obligations

            2,162                802                2,964   

Other liabilities and deferred credits*

     2,577        7,391         1,142        17,218         (26,663     1,665   

 

 

Total Liabilities

     10,284        24,547         4,206        54,663         (29,434     64,266   

Retained earnings

     37,983        21,448         (1,096     17,355         (31,186     44,504   

Other common stockholders’ equity

     7,367        39,152         1,107        40,283         (80,502     7,407   

Noncontrolling interests

                           362                362   

 

 

Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

   $ 55,634        85,147         4,217        112,663         (141,122     116,539   

 

 

*Includes intercompany loans.

              

 

28


Table of Contents
                                                                                         
     Millions of Dollars  
     Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015  
Statement of Cash Flows    ConocoPhillips     ConocoPhillips
Company
    ConocoPhillips
Canada
Funding
Company I
     All Other
Subsidiaries
    Consolidating
Adjustments
    Total
Consolidated
 

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

             

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities

     (263     (110     2         6,165        182        5,976   

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

             

Capital expenditures and investments

            (2,346             (6,640     1,073        (7,913

Working capital changes associated with investing activities

            (15             (827            (842

Proceeds from asset dispositions

     2,000        190                232        (2,099     323   

Long-term advances/loans—related parties

            (248             (1,973     2,221          

Collection of advances/loans—related parties

                           205        (100     105   

Intercompany cash management

     764        (892             128                 

Other

            297                1               298   

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

     2,764        (3,014             (8,874     1,095        (8,029

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

             

Issuance of debt

            4,471                248        (2,221     2,498   

Repayment of debt

            (100             (92     100        (92

Issuance of company common stock

     237                              (306     (69

Dividends paid

     (2,741                    (124     124        (2,741

Other

     3        (1,994             915        1,026        (50

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

     (2,501     2,377                947        (1,277     (454

 

 

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents

                           (142            (142

 

 

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents

            (747     2         (1,904            (2,649

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

            770        7         4,285               5,062   

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

   $        23        9         2,381               2,413   

 

 
Statement of Cash Flows    Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014*  

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

             

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing operating activities

   $ 14,722        (180     10         14,063        (15,014     13,601   

Net cash provided by discontinued operations

            202                408        (453     157   

 

 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities

     14,722        22        10         14,471        (15,467     13,758   

 

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

             

Capital expenditures and investments

            (3,235             (11,132     1,638        (12,729

Working capital changes associated with investing activities

            34                360               394   

Proceeds from asset dispositions

     16,912        1,386                105        (16,969     1,434   

Net purchases of short-term investments

                           (109            (109

Long-term advances/loans—related parties

            (635             (7     642          

Collection of advances/loans—related parties

            47                112        (16     143   

Intercompany cash management

     (28,922     33,392                (4,470              

Other

            (429             (25            (454

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing investing activities

     (12,010     30,560                (15,166     (14,705     (11,321

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

            133                (73     (133     (73

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities

     (12,010     30,693                (15,239     (14,838     (11,394

 

 

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

             

Issuance of debt

                           642        (642       

Repayment of debt

     (400     (16             (105     16        (505

Issuance of company common stock

     308                              (281     27   

Dividends paid

     (2,618     (15,088             (458     15,546        (2,618

Other

     (2     (16,863             1,514        15,331        (20

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) continuing financing activities

     (2,712     (31,967             1,593        29,970        (3,116

Net cash used in discontinued operations

                           (335     335          

 

 

Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities

     (2,712     (31,967             1,258        30,305        (3,116

 

 

Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents

                           (86            (86

 

 

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents

            (1,252     10         404               (838

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

            2,434        229         3,583               6,246   

 

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period

   $        1,182        239         3,987               5,408   

 

 

*Certain amounts have been reclassified to conform to current-period presentation. See Note 15—Cash Flow Information, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

  

 

29


Table of Contents
Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Management’s Discussion and Analysis is the Company’s analysis of its financial performance and of significant trends that may affect future performance. It should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes. It contains forward-looking statements including, without limitation, statements relating to the Company’s plans, strategies, objectives, expectations and intentions that are made pursuant to the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “effort,” “target” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. The Company does not undertake to update, revise or correct any of the forward-looking information unless required to do so under the federal securities laws. Readers are cautioned that such forward-looking statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s disclosures under the heading: “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE ‘SAFE HARBOR’ PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995,” beginning on page 50.

Due to discontinued operations reporting, income (loss) from continuing operations is more representative of ConocoPhillips’ earnings. The terms “earnings” and “loss” as used in Management’s Discussion and Analysis refer to income (loss) from continuing operations.

BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT AND EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

ConocoPhillips is the world’s largest independent exploration and production (E&P) company, based on proved reserves and production of liquids and natural gas. Headquartered in Houston, Texas, we had operations and activities in 25 countries, approximately 17,800 employees worldwide and total assets of $106 billion as of September 30, 2015.

Basis of Presentation

Effective November 1, 2015, the Other International and Europe segments will be restructured to align with changes to our internal organization structure. The Libya business will be moved from the Other International segment to the Europe segment, which will be renamed Europe and North Africa. Accordingly, results of operations for the Other International and Europe segments will be revised for current and prior periods beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015. There is no expected impact on our consolidated financial statements, and the impact on our segment presentation is expected to be immaterial.

Overview

We are an independent E&P company focused on exploring for, developing and producing crude oil and natural gas globally. Our diverse portfolio primarily includes resource-rich North American unconventional assets; oil sands assets in Canada; lower-risk legacy assets in North America, Europe, Asia and Australia; several major international developments; and an inventory of global conventional and unconventional exploration prospects.

The energy landscape has changed dramatically in the past year. Increased supply and lower forecasted demand growth have caused crude oil and natural gas prices to decline substantially, with significant uncertainty around the timing of a rebound. Nevertheless, our value proposition to our shareholders remains unchanged. Our goal is to deliver a compelling dividend, affordable growth and maintain financial strength. We are taking aggressive actions to position the company for success in a low, more volatile price environment. We are focused on achieving cash flow neutrality (cash from continuing operations sufficient to fund our dividend and capital program) in 2017. Cash flow neutrality will be a function of price and capital flexibility. Consistent with our commitment to offer a compelling dividend, we modestly raised the quarterly dividend and paid dividends on our common stock of $0.9 billion, in the third quarter of 2015. We believe we can deliver on our value proposition and

 

30


Table of Contents

performance goals by safely executing the business, increasing our capital flexibility, optimizing our portfolio and lowering our cost structure with sustainable changes.

Safely executing the business

In the third quarter of 2015, we exceeded our production expectation due to efficient execution of turnarounds and strong well performance. We are on track to exceed our full-year 2015 volume target through investments in our conventional and unconventional assets. Through the nine-month period of 2015, our project startups include Eldfisk II, Brodgar H3 subsea tie-back, Enochdhu and Surmont 2. We achieved project startup at CD5 and Drill Site 2S, in Alaska, during October, and we are progressing toward first cargo in Australia Pacific LNG Pty Ltd (APLNG) by year end.

Increasing our capital flexibility

We participate in a commodity price-driven and capital-intensive industry, which requires significant investment in major projects across the globe. Given our view of greater price volatility, we see value in having a significant inventory of shorter cycle time and low-cost-of-supply opportunities in our resource base. As our major capital projects start up, we plan to direct a higher percentage of our capital to unconventionals, while maintaining the flexibility to respond to changing market conditions. We use a disciplined approach to set our capital plans and to allocate capital to the highest quality investment opportunities in our portfolio.

In response to a view that low commodity prices would modestly recover in 2015, we set our three-year operating plan for 2015 to 2017 at $11.5 billion of anticipated annual capital spending. We have reduced our 2015 capital guidance to $10.2 billion, as prices have remained low through the nine-month period of 2015, reflecting a slower recovery. Capital spending in 2016 and 2017 could be adjusted based on commodity prices.

Through the nine-month period of 2015, we incurred $7.9 billion of capital expenditures, or 77 percent of our updated capital guidance.

Portfolio optimization

In line with our focus on capital flexibility, we announced plans to reduce future capital spending in our deepwater exploration program in the third quarter of 2015. As a result of this decision, we have recognized cancellation costs and written off capitalized rig spend in relation to the termination of our Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract with Ensco. We have also recorded an impairment for the associated carrying value of capitalized undeveloped leasehold cost on certain Gulf of Mexico leases where we have decided not to conduct further activity. We continue to market certain non-core assets, with an approach of exiting businesses that will not compete for funding in our portfolio.

Lowering our cost structure with sustainable changes

We are taking decisive actions to achieve sustainable operating cost reductions across the business. We have targeted a $1 billion reduction in operating costs in 2016, compared with 2014. Operating costs include production and operating expense; selling, general and administrative expense; and exploration expense excluding dry hole and leasehold impairment expense.

We believe these tenets, combined with our strong balance sheet, position us to successfully navigate the volatile price environment.

Business Environment

In the first half of 2014, strong crude oil prices were supported by geopolitical tensions impacting supplies, as well as global oil demand growth. This was followed by an abrupt decline in prices beginning in the third quarter of 2014, as surging production growth from U.S. tight oil and the decision by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to maintain production outweighed fears of supply disruptions. These developments, combined with lower forecasts for global oil demand growth, caused crude oil prices to plummet to near five-year lows at the end of 2014. Prices have remained significantly lower through the third quarter of 2015, relative to the same period in 2014.

 

31


Table of Contents

The energy industry has periodically experienced this type of extreme volatility due to fluctuating supply and demand conditions. Dramatic swings in commodity prices impact our profitability and cash flows, but are beyond our control. Commodity prices are the most significant factor impacting our profitability and the related reinvestment of operating cash flows into our business. Among other dynamics that could influence world energy markets and commodity prices are global economic health, supply disruptions or fears thereof caused by civil unrest or military conflicts, actions taken by OPEC, environmental laws, tax regulations, governmental policies and weather-related disruptions. North America’s energy landscape has been transformed from resource scarcity to an abundance of supply, primarily due to advances in technology responsible for the rapid growth of unconventional production, successful exploration and development in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, and rising production from the Canadian oil sands. In order to navigate through a volatile market, our strategy is to maintain a strong balance sheet, sustainably lower cost structure, and a diverse low cost-of-supply portfolio that can provide the resilience to withstand challenging business cycles.

Our earnings generally correlate with industry price levels for crude oil and natural gas. These are commodity products, the prices of which are subject to factors external to the company and over which we have no control. The following graph depicts the trend in average benchmark prices for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil, Dated Brent crude oil and U.S. Henry Hub (HH) natural gas:

 

LOGO

Brent crude oil prices averaged $50.26 per barrel in the third quarter of 2015, a decrease of 51 percent compared with $101.85 per barrel in the third quarter of 2014, and a decrease of 19 percent compared with $61.92 per barrel in the second quarter of 2015. Industry crude prices for WTI averaged $46.37 per barrel in the third quarter of 2015, a decrease of 52 percent compared with $97.48 per barrel in the third quarter of 2014, and a decrease of 20 percent compared with $57.84 per barrel in the second quarter of 2015. Crude oil prices have remained under pressure through the third quarter of 2015 due to continued growth in global production that has outpaced demand growth, as evidenced by a large observed inventory increase.

Henry Hub natural gas prices averaged $2.77 per million British thermal units (MMBTU) in the third quarter of 2015, a decrease of 32 percent compared with $4.07 per MMBTU in the third quarter of 2014, and an increase of 5 percent compared with $2.65 in the second quarter of 2015. Natural gas prices remained under pressure as production growth continued and U.S. underground gas storage inventories have risen toward the top of the five-year range over the past few months.

Bitumen prices remained low in the third quarter of 2015, mainly as a result of decreased global crude oil prices. Our realized bitumen price was $17.53 per barrel in the third quarter of 2015, a decrease of 72 percent compared with $62.49 in the third quarter of 2014. The third quarter realized price decreased 47 percent from

 

32


Table of Contents

$33.30 per barrel in the second quarter of 2015 as both WTI and light-to-heavy differentials weakened. Our total average realized price was $32.91 per barrel of oil equivalent (BOE) in the third quarter of 2015, a decrease of 49 percent compared with $64.78 per BOE in the third quarter of 2014. In the first nine months of 2015, our total realized price was $36.31 per BOE, a decrease of 47 percent compared with $68.71 in the first nine months of 2014. Both the quarterly and annual price decreases reflect lower average realized prices for crude oil, natural gas, bitumen and natural gas liquids.

Key Operating and Financial Highlights

Significant highlights during the third quarter of 2015 included the following:

 

   

Increased quarterly dividend to $0.74 per share in July.

   

Accelerated capital reductions; further reduced 2015 capital expenditures guidance from $11.0 billion to $10.2 billion.

   

Achieved third-quarter production of 1,554 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (MBOED); on track to exceed 2015 production guidance.

   

Four percent year-over-year production growth from continuing operations, adjusted for Libya, downtime and dispositions.

   

Achieved first oil at Surmont 2 in Canada during the quarter, as well as CD5 and Drill Site 2S in Alaska in October; on track for first cargo at APLNG by year end.

   

Successfully completed major turnarounds in the Alaska, Europe, and Asia Pacific and Middle East segments.

Outlook

Production and Capital Guidance

Fourth-quarter production guidance is 1,585 to 1,625 MBOED. Full-year 2015 production guidance is 1,585 to 1,595 MBOED, resulting in expected year-over-year growth of 3 to 4 percent from continuing operations excluding Libya.

We have further reduced our 2015 capital expenditures guidance to $10.2 billion compared with initial guidance of $11.5 billion. Approximately, half of these reductions are due to market factors, while the remainder are the result of discretionary actions.

We expect to release guidance on our 2016 capital and operating plan in December 2015.

Marketing Activities

In line with our objective to continuously optimize our portfolio, we are currently marketing certain non-core assets. We expect to generate between $1 billion and $2 billion in proceeds from asset sales in 2015.

Unproved Property Impairments

As we optimize our investments and exercise capital flexibility in response to low commodity prices, it is reasonably likely we will incur future unproved property impairments. It is not reasonably practicable to quantify the financial impact, but the impact could be material to our results of operations for the period in which the property impairments are incurred.

Reserve Replacement

Proved reserve estimates require economic production based on historical 12-month, first-of-month, average prices and current costs. Therefore, as prices and cost levels change from year to year, the estimate of proved reserves also changes. Generally, our proved reserves decrease as prices decline and increase as prices rise. The major decline in commodity prices during 2015 is expected to lead to a reduction of approximately 5 percent to our year-end 2014 proved reserves. We do not expect these price-related revisions and 2015

 

33


Table of Contents

production to be fully offset by reserve additions. As a result, we expect our 2015 organic reserve replacement ratio to be significantly below 100 percent. These reserve estimates are subject to change based on commodity prices for the remainder of 2015 as well as capital spending levels, timing of project approvals and other factors. We expect our proved reserves to fluctuate directionally with commodity prices over time.

Prior Year Tax Benefit

In the fourth quarter of 2015, we expect to file refund claims for prior years electing the fair market value method of apportioning interest expense in the United States. There is ongoing analysis required to complete and file the amended tax returns. Based on information currently available, this election is expected to generate a tax benefit between $150 million and $250 million, to be recorded in the fourth quarter of 2015.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Unless otherwise indicated, discussion of results for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2015, is based on a comparison with the corresponding period of 2014.

Consolidated Results

A summary of the company’s income (loss) from continuing operations by business segment follows:

 

                                                           
       Millions of Dollars  
       Three Months Ended
September 30
       Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
       2015        2014        2015        2014  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Alaska

     $ 53           473           393           1,698   

Lower 48

       (852        32           (1,550        621   

Canada

       (145        307           (469        845   

Europe

       (4        213           670           819   

Asia Pacific and Middle East

       273           772           1,025           2,390   

Other International

       (43        (18        (284        74   

Corporate and Other

       (338        (130        (719        (616

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     $ (1,056        1,649           (934        5,831   

 

 

Earnings for ConocoPhillips decreased 164 and 116 percent for the third quarter of 2015 and the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The decrease in both periods primarily resulted from lower commodity prices.

In addition, earnings were negatively impacted by:

 

   

Higher exploration expense, primarily from the Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship and related contract termination costs recognized in the third quarter of 2015, and increased unproved property impairments and dry hole expenses.

   

Higher depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) mainly from increased production in both periods of 2015.

   

Restructuring charges of $227 million after-tax incurred in the nine-month period of 2015.

   

The absence of a $154 million after-tax benefit in the second quarter of 2014 associated with the favorable resolution of a contingent liability.

   

An adverse deferred tax charge of $129 million, from increased corporate tax rates in Canada in the second quarter of 2015.

 

34


Table of Contents

These items were partially offset by:

 

   

Lower production taxes due to reduced commodity prices.

   

Higher crude oil, bitumen, liquefied natural gas (LNG) and natural gas sales volumes.

   

A $555 million net deferred tax benefit resulting from a change in the U.K. tax rate in the first quarter of 2015.

   

Lower operating expense.

   

The absence of a $151 million after-tax impairment as a result of reduced volume forecasts on proved properties and associated undeveloped leasehold costs in the Lower 48 in the third quarter of 2014.

   

Higher licensing revenues.

   

The absence of a $109 million after-tax impairment of undeveloped leasehold costs associated with the offshore Canada Amauligak discovery, Arctic Islands and Beaufort properties in the second quarter of 2014.

See the “Segment Results” section for additional information.

Income Statement Analysis

Sales and other operating revenues decreased 40 percent in the third quarter and 44 percent in the nine-month period of 2015, mainly as a result of lower prices across all commodities. Lower prices in both periods were partly offset by higher crude oil and LNG sales volumes.

Equity in earnings of affiliates decreased 71 percent in the third quarter and 66 percent in the nine-month period of 2015, primarily as a result of lower earnings from the FCCL Partnership and Qatar Liquefied Gas Company Limited (3) (QG3) due to lower commodity prices. The decrease in both periods of 2015 was also partly offset by benefits of foreign exchange-related impacts from APLNG.

Gain on dispositions increased $102 million in the nine-month period of 2015, primarily as a result of gains realized from unproved land swaps in Canada in the first and second quarters of 2015. Additional gains realized in the nine-month period of 2015 resulted from the first quarter disposition of our Ozona/Midland tight oil assets in the Lower 48.

Other income decreased 72 percent in the nine-month period of 2015. The decrease was mainly due to the absence of income from the second and third quarters of 2014 related to the resolution of a contingent liability in the Other International segment and a legal arbitration settlement in Asia Pacific and Middle East, respectively.

Purchased commodities decreased 30 percent in the third quarter and 44 percent in the nine-month period of 2015, largely as a result of lower natural gas prices and the absence of a $130 million loss in the Lower 48 related to transportation and storage capacity agreements recognized in the first quarter of 2014.

Production and operating expenses decreased 10 percent in the third quarter of 2015, primarily as a result of lower operating expense levels, including turnaround costs incurred in 2014 in the Asia Pacific and Middle East segment and favorable foreign exchange-related impacts, partially offset by $124 million of restructuring expenses.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 11 percent in the nine-month period of 2015, primarily due to $284 million in restructuring and pension settlement expenses incurred in 2015, partially offset by lower staff and compensation-plan costs.

 

35


Table of Contents

Exploration expenses increased 131 percent in the third quarter and 64 percent in the nine-month period of 2015, primarily due to $383 million, mainly recorded to other exploration expense, for the Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship and related contract termination costs, and $240 million for the write-down of Gulf of Mexico leases for which we have no plans to conduct further activity. Exploration expenses in the third quarter of 2015 also increased due to unproved property impairments from our decision to relinquish our Palangkaraya Production Sharing Contract in Indonesia, dry hole expenses recorded for four wells in Malaysia, and rig storage costs for the Athena drilling rig in Angola.

For the nine-month period, exploration expense was also increased due to dry hole costs associated with the Vali-1 and Omosi-1 wells offshore Angola and the Harrier prospect in the Gulf of Mexico, along with undeveloped leasehold impairments in Angola and Poland. The increased expense was partly offset by the absence of a $145 million impairment of undeveloped leasehold costs associated with the offshore Canada Amauligak discovery, Arctic Islands and Beaufort properties in the second quarter of 2014.

DD&A increased 11 percent in the nine-month period of 2015. The increase was mainly associated with higher production volumes in the Lower 48 and Asia Pacific and Middle East. Additionally, a significant decline in the 12-month rolling-average price used to calculate proved reserves resulted in an increase through the third quarter of 2015 of approximately $178 million in the Lower 48 and Alaska combined. The increases were partly offset by reserve additions in the Lower 48.

Taxes other than income taxes decreased 58 percent in the third quarter and 63 percent in the nine-month period of 2015, mainly as a result of lower commodity prices in Alaska, Lower 48 and Asia Pacific and Middle East.

Interest and debt expense increased 37 percent for the nine-month period of 2015, mainly as a result of lower capitalized interest from projects completed and increased debt levels in 2015.

Foreign currency transaction losses decreased by $113 million for the nine-month period of 2015, mainly as a result of the weakening of the Malaysian ringgit to the U.S. dollar and the subsequent remeasurement of capital accruals and deferred tax balances. Foreign currency transaction losses also decreased due to the remeasurement of a pension liability in 2015 and the absence of value added tax receivable losses from 2014, both in Asia Pacific and Middle East.

See Note 19—Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for information regarding our provision for income taxes and effective tax rate.

 

36


Table of Contents

Summary Operating Statistics

 

                                                           
       Three Months Ended
September 30
       Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
       2015        2014        2015        2014  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Average Net Production

                   

Crude oil (MBD)*

       577           561           602           585   

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

       156           157           157           161   

Bitumen (MBD)

       157           124           150           125   

Natural gas (MMCFD)**

       3,984           3,833           4,059           3,911   

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

       1,554           1,481           1,586           1,523   

 

 
       Dollars Per Unit  

Average Sales Prices

                   

Crude oil (per barrel)

     $ 46.41           96.63           50.83           100.56   

Natural gas liquids (per barrel)

       15.54           37.83           18.24           41.46   

Bitumen (per barrel)

       17.53           62.49           22.17           61.65   

Natural gas (per thousand cubic feet)

       3.87           5.96           4.16           6.77   

 

 
       Millions of Dollars  

Exploration Expenses

                   

General administrative, geological and geophysical, and

                   

lease rentals

     $ 536           194           854           604   

Leasehold impairment

       377           179           662           414   

Dry holes

       148           86           576           254   

 

 
     $ 1,061           459           2,092           1,272   

 

 

Excludes discontinued operations.

  *Thousands of barrels per day.

**Millions of cubic feet per day. Represents quantities available for sale and excludes gas equivalent of natural gas liquids included above.

We explore for, produce, transport and market crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids on a worldwide basis. At September 30, 2015, our operations were producing in the United States, Norway, the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, Timor-Leste, Indonesia, China, Malaysia, Qatar, Libya and Russia.

Total production from continuing operations, including Libya, increased 5 percent in the third quarter of 2015. Average liquids production increased 6 percent in the third quarter of 2015. Total production from continuing operations, including Libya, and average liquids production, both increased 4 percent in the nine-month period of 2015. The increase in total average production in both periods primarily resulted from additional production from major developments, including tight oil plays in the Lower 48; Gumusut in Malaysia; APLNG in Australia; Foster Creek Phase F in Canada; and the Jasmine Field and Greater Britannia projects in the U.K. Improved well performance, mostly in western Canada, the Lower 48 and Norway, and lower turnaround activity in 2015 also contributed to higher production in both periods. These increases were largely offset by normal field decline. In the third quarter of 2015, we achieved production of 1,554 MBOED. Adjusted for downtime and dispositions of 25 MBOED, our production from continuing operations, excluding Libya, increased by 56 MBOED, or 4 percent, compared with the third quarter of 2014.

 

37


Table of Contents

Segment Results

Alaska

 

                                                           
       Three Months Ended
September 30
       Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
       2015        2014        2015        2014  
    

 

 

      

 

 

 

Income From Continuing Operations (millions of dollars)

     $ 53           473           393           1,698   

 

 

Average Net Production

                   

Crude oil (MBD)

       144           139           154           162   

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

       10           8           12           13   

Natural gas (MMCFD)

       34           48           42           50   

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

       160           155           173           183   

 

 

Average Sales Prices

                   

Crude oil (dollars per barrel)

     $ 50.48           102.36           54.18           106.06   

Natural gas (dollars per thousand cubic feet)

       4.26           5.47           4.35           5.55   

 

 

The Alaska segment primarily explores for, produces, transports and markets crude oil, natural gas liquids, natural gas and LNG. As of September 30, 2015, Alaska contributed 18 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 1 percent of our worldwide natural gas production.

Earnings from Alaska decreased 89 percent in the third quarter and 77 percent for the nine-month period of 2015. The decrease in earnings in both periods was primarily due to lower crude oil prices, partly offset by lower production taxes. The earnings decrease in the third quarter of 2015 was partially offset by increased sales volumes.

Average production increased 3 percent in the third quarter of 2015 compared with the same period in 2014, primarily due to lower planned downtime activity. Average production decreased 5 percent for the nine-month period of 2015, mainly due to normal field decline and downtime.

Our plans to drill an exploration well in the Chukchi Sea continue to be evaluated in light of the uncertainties of evolving federal regulatory requirements, operational permitting standards and the current market environment. The total capitalized costs associated with the Chukchi leases were approximately $634 million as of September 30, 2015.

 

38


Table of Contents

Lower 48

 

                                                           
     Three Months Ended
September 30
     Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015      2014      2015      2014  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations (millions of dollars)

   $ (852      32         (1,550      621   

 

 

Average Net Production

           

Crude oil (MBD)

     213         191         207         184   

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

     95         104         95         99   

Natural gas (MMCFD)

     1,457         1,485         1,487         1,482   

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

     551         543         550         530   

 

 

Average Sales Prices

           

Crude oil (dollars per barrel)

   $ 41.56         87.91         44.84         91.02   

Natural gas liquids (dollars per barrel)

     12.55         30.67         14.45         32.51   

Natural gas (dollars per thousand cubic feet)

     2.65         3.96         2.54         4.48   

 

 

As of September 30, 2015, the Lower 48 contributed 33 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 37 percent of our worldwide natural gas production. The Lower 48 segment consists of operations located in the U.S. Lower 48 states and exploration activities in the Gulf of Mexico.

Lower 48 reported losses of $852 million in the third quarter and $1,550 million in the nine-month period of 2015, an $884 million and $2,171 million decrease compared with the same periods of 2014, respectively. Earnings decreases in both periods were primarily due to lower commodity prices and higher DD&A from increased production. These decreases were partly offset by higher production volumes; lower production taxes; and the absence of a $151 million after-tax impairment recognized in the third quarter of 2014 as a result of reduced volume forecasts on proved properties and the associated undeveloped leasehold costs. Additionally, earnings in the third quarter of 2015 decreased due to after-tax charges of $246 million related to the termination of our Gulf of Mexico deepwater drillship contract with Ensco and $154 million for a write-down of Gulf of Mexico leases for which we have no plans to conduct further activity.

In the third quarter of 2015, our average realized crude oil price of $41.56 per barrel was 10 percent less than WTI of $46.37 per barrel. The differential is driven primarily by local market dynamics in the Gulf Coast, Bakken and the Permian Basin, and may remain relatively wide in the near-term.

Total average production increased 1 percent in the third quarter and 4 percent for the nine-month period of 2015. Average crude oil production increased 12 percent and 13 percent over the same periods, respectively. The increases in both periods were mainly attributable to new production and well performance, primarily from Eagle Ford, Bakken and the Permian Basin, partially offset by normal field decline.

 

39


Table of Contents

Canada

 

                                                           
     Three Months Ended
September 30
     Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015     2014      2015     2014  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations (millions of dollars)

   $ (145     307         (469     845   

 

 

Average Net Production

         

Crude oil (MBD)

     12        13         13        13   

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

     27        21         26        24   

Bitumen (MBD)

         

Consolidated operations

     12        9         12        12   

Equity affiliates

     145        115         138        113   

 

 

Total bitumen

     157        124         150        125   

Natural gas (MMCFD)

     712        707         739        709   

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

     315        276         312        280   

 

 

Average Sales Prices

         

Crude oil (dollars per barrel)

   $ 38.44        82.48         40.71        83.00   

Natural gas liquids (dollars per barrel)

     14.50        45.29         17.30        49.53   

Bitumen (dollars per barrel)

         

Consolidated operations

     22.67        64.95         29.13        64.95   

Equity affiliates

     17.16        62.30         21.57        61.30   

Total bitumen

     17.53        62.49         22.17        61.65   

Natural gas (dollars per thousand cubic feet)

     1.94        3.50         2.01        4.47   

 

 

Our Canadian operations mainly consist of natural gas fields in western Canada and oil sands developments in the Athabasca Region of northeastern Alberta. As of September 30, 2015, Canada contributed 21 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 18 percent of our worldwide natural gas production.

Canada operations reported losses of $145 million in the third quarter and $469 million for the nine-month period of 2015, a $452 million and $1,314 million decrease compared with the same periods of 2014, respectively. The decrease in earnings in both periods was primarily due to lower commodity prices, mainly bitumen and natural gas. The earnings decrease was partly offset by higher bitumen production volumes and lower operating expenses and DD&A, both primarily from favorable foreign currency impacts.

Earnings in the nine-month period were also reduced due to the $136 million impact of a 2 percent increase in Alberta corporate tax rates on deferred taxes, partly offset by the absence of a $109 million after-tax impairment of undeveloped leasehold costs in 2014, associated with the offshore Amauligak discovery, Arctic Islands and other Beaufort properties.

Total average production increased 14 percent in the third quarter and 11 percent for the nine-month period of 2015, while bitumen production increased 27 percent and 20 percent over the same periods, respectively. The increases in total production in both periods were mainly attributable to strong well performance in western Canada, reduced turnaround activity, the continued ramp-up of production from Foster Creek Phase F, lower royalty impacts, and strong plant performance at Foster Creek and Christina Lake. These increases were partly offset by normal field decline.

 

40


Table of Contents

Europe

 

                                                           
     Three Months Ended
September 30
     Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015     2014      2015      2014  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations (millions of dollars)

   $ (4     213         670         819   

 

 

Average Net Production

          

Crude oil (MBD)

     116        119         119         126   

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

     7        8         7         8   

Natural gas (MMCFD)

     415        404         463         452   

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

     192        194         203         209   

 

 

Average Sales Prices

          

Crude oil (dollars per barrel)

   $ 49.86        103.17         55.65         107.79   

Natural gas liquids (dollars per barrel)

     24.74        54.47         28.20         57.62   

Natural gas (dollars per thousand cubic feet)

     7.11        7.86         7.58         9.32   

 

 

The Europe segment consists of operations principally located in the Norwegian and U.K. sectors of the North Sea, as well as exploration activities in the Barents Sea, offshore Norway. As of September 30, 2015, our Europe operations contributed 14 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 11 percent of our worldwide natural gas production.

Earnings for Europe operations decreased 102 percent in the third quarter and 18 percent for the nine-month period of 2015, respectively. Earnings in both periods were primarily impacted by lower crude oil prices as well as lower sales volumes in the U.K. For the nine-month period of 2015, earnings additionally decreased due to a $33 million after-tax property impairment given lower natural gas prices. The nine-month earnings decrease was partly offset by a $555 million net deferred tax benefit as a result of a change in the U.K. tax rate, effective at the beginning of 2015.

Average production decreased 1 percent in the third quarter and 3 percent for the nine-month period of 2015, compared to the same periods in 2014. The decrease in both periods was mostly due to normal field decline, partly offset by continued ramp-up of production from the Greater Britannia Area, the Jasmine Field and the Greater Ekofisk Area.

 

41


Table of Contents

Asia Pacific and Middle East

 

                                                           
     Three Months Ended
September 30
     Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015      2014      2015      2014  
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income From Continuing Operations (millions of dollars)

   $ 273         772         1,025         2,390   

 

 

Average Net Production

           

Crude oil (MBD)

           

Consolidated operations

     73         72         90         78   

Equity affiliates

     15         15         15         15   

 

 

Total crude oil

     88         87         105         93   

 

 

Natural gas liquids (MBD)

           

Consolidated operations

     9         8         9         10   

Equity affiliates

     8         8         8         7   

 

 

Total natural gas liquids

     17         16         17         17   

 

 

Natural gas (MMCFD)

           

Consolidated operations

     698         670         709         715   

Equity affiliates

     668         518         618         501   

 

 

Total natural gas

     1,366         1,188         1,327         1,216   

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

     332         301         344         314   

 

 

Average Sales Prices

           

Crude oil (dollars per barrel)

           

Consolidated operations

   $ 46.81         99.07         52.88         103.28   

Equity affiliates

     50.68         104.09         55.66         106.57   

Total crude oil

     47.38         99.92         53.26         103.82   

Natural gas liquids (dollars per barrel)

           

Consolidated operations

     32.26         69.69         38.12         73.97   

Equity affiliates

     31.26         67.13         36.05         71.51   

Total natural gas liquids

     31.79         68.48         37.20         72.96   

Natural gas (dollars per thousand cubic feet)

           

Consolidated operations

     5.97         9.39         6.56         10.03   

Equity affiliates

     4.37         9.11         5.31         9.97   

Total natural gas

     5.19         9.26         5.98         10.00   

 

 

The Asia Pacific and Middle East segment has operations in China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Australia, Timor-Leste and Qatar, as well as exploration activities in Brunei and Myanmar. As of September 30, 2015, Asia Pacific and Middle East contributed 13 percent of our worldwide liquids production and 33 percent of our worldwide natural gas production.

Earnings for Asia Pacific and Middle East operations decreased 65 percent in the third quarter and 57 percent in the nine-month period of 2015. The decrease in earnings for both periods was mainly due to lower prices across all commodities. Earnings in the third quarter of 2015 were further decreased by $49 million after-tax dry hole costs associated with four wells in Malaysia and a $41 million after-tax unproved property impairment from our decision to relinquish our Palangkaraya Production Sharing Contract in Indonesia. Higher DD&A expense from increased volumes also decreased earnings in the nine-month period of 2015. The decrease in both periods was partially offset by lower production taxes, as a result of lower crude oil prices, increased crude oil and LNG volumes, and lower feedstock costs in Western Australia.

 

42


Table of Contents

Average production increased 10 percent in both the third quarter and nine-month period of 2015, compared with the same periods of 2014. The production increase in both periods was mainly attributable to new production from Gumusut, in Malaysia, which came online in the fourth quarter of 2014; the ramp-up of APLNG production due to additional gas processing facilities online; and improved drilling and well performance in China. Reduced turnaround activity in Western Australia also increased production in the third quarter of 2015. Production increases were partially offset by normal field decline and the Gumusut planned turnaround in June and July of 2015.

Other International

 

                                                           
     Three Months Ended
September 30
    Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
         2015         2014         2015         2014  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations (millions of dollars)

   $ (43     (18     (284     74   

 

 

Average Net Production

        

Crude oil (MBD)

        

Consolidated operations

            8               3   

Equity affiliates

     4        4        4        4   

 

 

Total crude oil

     4        12        4        7   

 

 

Natural gas (MMCFD)

            1        1        2   

 

 

Total Production (MBOED)

     4        12        4        7   

 

 

Average Sales Prices

        

Crude oil (dollars per barrel)

        

Consolidated operations

   $        95.22               95.82   

Equity affiliates

     35.11        66.47        38.78        68.96   

Total crude oil

     35.11        83.22        38.78        77.62   

Natural gas (dollars per thousand cubic feet)

                          6.44   

 

 

The Other International segment includes operations in Libya and Russia, as well as exploration activities in Colombia, Angola, Senegal and Azerbaijan. As of September 30, 2015, Other International contributed less than 1 percent of our worldwide liquids production.

Other International operations reported a loss of $43 million in the third quarter and $284 million for the nine-month period of 2015, compared with a loss of $18 million and earnings of $74 million, respectively, in the same periods of 2014. The third quarter decrease in earnings was primarily due to rig storage costs for the Athena drilling rig in Angola. Additionally, the absence of a $154 million benefit from the favorable resolution of a contingent liability in 2014, dry hole expenses for the Omosi-1 and Vali-1 wells in Angola, and higher exploration expenses related to the Angola Block 37 and Poland leasehold impairments all drove the earnings decrease for the nine-month period of 2015.

Average production decreased by 8 MBOED and 3 MBOED in the third quarter and nine-month period of 2015, respectively, compared with the same periods in 2014, due to the current situation in Libya. Libya production remains shut in, as the Es Sider crude oil export terminal closure has continued throughout the third quarter of 2015. The near-term operating and drilling activity remains uncertain as a result of the ongoing civil unrest.

 

 

43


Table of Contents

Exploration Update

In April 2015, we plugged and abandoned the Omosi-1 exploration well, in Block 37 offshore Angola. As a result, we recorded an approximately $81 million after-tax charge to dry hole expense in the first quarter of 2015. In June 2015, we plugged and abandoned the Vali-1 exploration well at a $59 million after-tax charge to dry hole expense. Vali-1 was the third wildcat in our four-well exploration commitment in the Kwanza Basin.

In June 2015, due to lack of commerciality of wells drilled, the decision was made to impair Block 37 offshore Angola. We have a 50 percent participating interest in Block 36 offshore Angola with a leasehold and other asset net book value of $438 million.

The Athena drilling rig was stored in Angola from July 2015 and was mobilized to Senegal in October to commence the drilling program in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Corporate and Other

 

                                                           
     Millions of Dollars  
     Three Months Ended
September 30
    Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
         2015         2014         2015         2014  
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations

        

Net interest

   $ (176     (36     (492     (357

Corporate general and administrative expenses

     (71     (51     (163     (133

Technology

     3        (26     75        (74

Other

     (94     (17     (139     (52

 

 
   $ (338     (130     (719     (616

 

 

Net interest consists of interest and financing expense, net of interest income and capitalized interest, as well as premiums incurred on the early retirement of debt. Net interest increased by $140 million in the third quarter and $135 million in the nine-month period of 2015, compared with the same periods in 2014. Net interest in both periods increased primarily due to lower capitalized interest on projects and increased debt, in addition to the absence of a $61 million tax benefit associated with the election of the fair market value method of apportioning interest expense in the United States and the interest on favorable tax settlement of a 2006 foreign currency loss, both booked in 2014.

Corporate general and administrative expenses increased 39 percent in the third quarter and 23 percent in the nine-month period of 2015. The increase in both periods was mainly due to pension settlement expense incurred in 2015, partially offset by lower staff and compensation-plan costs.

Technology includes our investment in new technologies or businesses, as well as licensing revenues. Activities are focused on heavy oil and oil sands, unconventional reservoirs, LNG, and subsurface, arctic and deepwater technologies, with an underlying commitment to environmental responsibility. Earnings from Technology were $3 million in the third quarter and $75 million in the nine-month period of 2015, compared with losses of $26 million and $74 million in the same periods of 2014, respectively. The increase in earnings in both periods primarily resulted from higher licensing revenues.

The category “Other” includes certain foreign currency transaction gains and losses, environmental costs associated with sites no longer in operation and other costs not directly associated with an operating segment. “Other” expenses increased by $77 million in the third quarter of 2015 and $87 million for the nine-month period of 2015. “Other” expenses increased in both periods due to 2015 restructuring charges and higher foreign currency transaction losses. The “Other” expense increase in the nine-month period of 2015 was partially offset by lower environmental expenses.

 

44


Table of Contents

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

Financial Indicators

 

                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     September 30
2015
    December 31
2014
 
  

 

 

 

Short-term debt

   $ 175        182   

Total debt

     24,891        22,565   

Total equity

     44,555        52,273   

Percent of total debt to capital*

     36     30   

Percent of floating-rate debt to total debt

     7     5   

 

 

*Capital includes total debt and total equity.

To meet our short- and long-term liquidity requirements, we look to a variety of funding sources. Cash generated from continuing operating activities is the primary source of funding. During the first nine months of 2015, the primary uses of our available cash were $7,913 million to support our ongoing capital expenditures and investments program, $2,741 million to pay dividends and $92 million to repay debt. During the first nine months of 2015, cash and cash equivalents decreased by $2,649 million to $2,413 million.

In addition to cash flows from operating activities and proceeds from asset sales, we rely on our commercial paper and credit facility programs and our shelf registration statement to support our short- and long-term liquidity requirements. We believe current cash balances and cash generated by operations, together with access to external sources of funds as described below in the “Significant Sources of Capital” section, will be sufficient to meet our funding requirements in the near- and long-term, including our capital spending program, dividend payments and required debt payments.

Significant Sources of Capital

Operating Activities

Cash provided by continuing operating activities was $5,976 million for the first nine months of 2015, compared with $13,601 million for the corresponding period of 2014, a 56 percent decrease. The decrease was primarily due to lower prices across all commodities and the absence of the $1.3 billion distribution from FCCL in the first quarter of 2014, partly offset by year-over-year production growth. The distribution from FCCL resulted from our $2.8 billion prepayment of the remaining joint venture acquisition obligation in 2013, which substantially increased the financial flexibility of our 50 percent owned FCCL Partnership. We do not expect this individually significant distribution to recur in the future under current economic conditions.

While the stability of our cash flows from operating activities benefits from geographic diversity, our short- and long-term operating cash flows are highly dependent upon prices for crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids. Prices and margins in our industry have historically been volatile and are driven by market conditions over which we have no control. Absent other mitigating factors, as these prices and margins fluctuate, we would expect a corresponding change in our operating cash flows.

The level of absolute production volumes, as well as product and location mix, impacts our cash flows. Production levels are impacted by such factors as the volatile crude oil and natural gas price environment, which may impact investment decisions; the effects of price changes on production sharing and variable-royalty contracts; acquisition and disposition of fields; field production decline rates; new technologies; operating efficiencies; timing of startups and major turnarounds; political instability; weather-related disruptions; and the addition of proved reserves through exploratory success and their timely and cost-effective development. While we actively manage these factors, production levels can cause variability in cash flows, although generally this variability has not been as significant as that caused by commodity prices.

 

45


Table of Contents

To maintain or grow our production volumes, we must continue to add to our proved reserve base. For additional information regarding reserve replacement, see the Outlook section within Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Investing Activities

Proceeds from asset sales for the first nine months of 2015 were $323 million, compared with $1,434 million for the corresponding period of 2014. We continue to optimize our asset portfolio by focusing on assets which offer the highest returns and growth potential, while selling non-core assets. For additional information regarding proceeds from asset sales, see the Outlook section within Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

In May 2015, we liquidated certain deferred compensation investments for proceeds of $267 million, which is included in the “Other” line within “Cash Flows From Investing Activities” on our consolidated statement of cash flows. We do not expect further material liquidations associated with deferred compensation investments. For additional information, see Note 13—Fair Value Measurement, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Commercial Paper and Credit Facilities

At September 30, 2015, we had a revolving credit facility totaling $7.0 billion expiring in June 2019. Our revolving credit facility may be used for direct bank borrowings, for the issuance of letters of credit totaling up to $500 million, or as support for our commercial paper programs. The revolving credit facility is broadly syndicated among financial institutions and does not contain any material adverse change provisions or any covenants requiring maintenance of specified financial ratios or credit ratings. The facility agreement contains a cross-default provision relating to the failure to pay principal or interest on other debt obligations of $200 million or more by ConocoPhillips, or any of its consolidated subsidiaries.

Credit facility borrowings may bear interest at a margin above rates offered by certain designated banks in the London interbank market or at a margin above the overnight federal funds rate or prime rates offered by certain designated banks in the United States. The agreement calls for commitment fees on available, but unused, amounts. The agreement also contains early termination rights if our current directors or their approved successors cease to be a majority of the Board of Directors.

Our primary funding source for short-term working capital needs is the ConocoPhillips $6.1 billion commercial paper program. Commercial paper maturities are generally limited to 90 days. We also have the ConocoPhillips Qatar Funding Ltd. $900 million commercial paper program, which is used to fund commitments relating to QG3. At both September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had no direct borrowings or letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility. Under the ConocoPhillips Qatar Funding Ltd. commercial paper programs, $803 million of commercial paper was outstanding at September 30, 2015, compared with $860 million at December 31, 2014. Since we had $803 million of commercial paper outstanding and had issued no letters of credit, we had access to $6.2 billion in borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility at September 30, 2015.

In August 2015, Moody’s Investors Service downgraded our senior long-term debt ratings to “A2” from “A1,” with a stable outlook. In October 2015, Standard and Poor’s affirmed our “A” rating with a negative outlook. We do not have any ratings triggers on any of our corporate debt that would cause an automatic default, and thereby impact our access to liquidity, in the event of a further downgrade of our credit rating. If our credit rating were to deteriorate to a level prohibiting us from accessing the commercial paper market, we would still be able to access funds under our revolving credit facility.

Certain of our project-related contracts and derivative instruments contain provisions requiring us to post collateral. Many of these contracts and instruments permit us to post either cash or letters of credit as collateral. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had direct bank letters of credit of $388 million and $802 million, respectively, which secured performance obligations related to various purchase commitments incident to the ordinary conduct of business.

 

46


Table of Contents

Shelf Registration

We have a universal shelf registration statement on file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under which we, as a well-known seasoned issuer, have the ability to issue and sell an indeterminate amount of various types of debt and equity securities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As part of our normal ongoing business operations and consistent with normal industry practice, we enter into numerous agreements with other parties to pursue business opportunities, which share costs and apportion risks among the parties as governed by the agreements.

For information about guarantees, see Note 10—Guarantees, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Capital Requirements

For information about our capital expenditures and investments, see the “Capital Spending” section.

Our debt balance at September 30, 2015, was $24.9 billion, an increase of $2.3 billion from the balance at December 31, 2014, primarily as a result of the May 2015 issuance of $2.5 billion in new fixed and floating rate notes. For more information, see Note 8—Debt, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In July 2015, we announced an increase in the quarterly dividend rate to 74 cents per share. The dividend was paid September 1, 2015, to stockholders of record at the close of business on July 27, 2015. In October 2015, we announced a dividend of 74 cents per share. The dividend will be paid December 1, 2015, to stockholders of record at the close of business on October 19, 2015.

Capital Spending

 

                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
     2015      2014  
  

 

 

 

Alaska

   $ 1,085         1,174   

Lower 48

     3,010         4,353   

Canada

     887         1,750   

Europe

     1,230         1,912   

Asia Pacific and Middle East

     1,471         3,019   

Other International

     139         403   

Corporate and Other

     91         118   

 

 

Capital expenditures and investments from continuing operations

   $ 7,913         12,729   

 

 
Discontinued operations in Nigeria:    $         59   

Working capital changes associated with investing activities increased cash used in investing activities by $842 million for the first nine months of 2015, compared with a decrease in cash used in investing activities of $394 million for the corresponding period of 2014. The increase in cash used in investing activities for the first nine months of 2015 is attributable to reduced capital accruals, as compared to December 31, 2014, from lower activity levels in 2015, primarily in the Lower 48 and Canada. We do not anticipate any further significant changes to working capital from activity levels in 2015.

 

47


Table of Contents

During the first nine months of 2015, capital expenditures and investments from continuing operations supported key exploration and development programs, primarily:

 

   

Oil and natural gas development and exploration activities in the Lower 48, including Eagle Ford, Bakken, and the Permian Basin.

   

Major project expenditures associated with the APLNG joint venture in Australia.

   

Oil sands development, notably at Surmont 2, and ongoing liquids-rich plays in Canada.

   

Alaska activities related to development in the Greater Kuparuk Area, Greater Prudhoe Area and the Western North Slope.

   

In Europe, development activities in the Greater Ekofisk, Aasta Hansteen, Clair Ridge, Jasmine and Greater Britannia areas, and exploration and appraisal activities in the Jasmine and Greater Clair areas.

   

Exploration and appraisal drilling in deepwater Gulf of Mexico.

   

Continued development in Malaysia, Indonesia and China and exploration and appraisal activity in Malaysia, Indonesia, China and offshore Australia.

   

Exploration activities in Angola.

We have further reduced our 2015 capital expenditures guidance to $10.2 billion compared with initial guidance of $11.5 billion. Approximately, half of these reductions are due to market factors, while the remainder are the result of discretionary actions.

Contingencies

A number of lawsuits involving a variety of claims arising in the ordinary course of business have been made against ConocoPhillips. We also may be required to remove or mitigate the effects on the environment of the placement, storage, disposal or release of certain chemical, mineral and petroleum substances at various active and inactive sites. We regularly assess the need for accounting recognition or disclosure of these contingencies. In the case of all known contingencies (other than those related to income taxes), we accrue a liability when the loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. If a range of amounts can be reasonably estimated and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, then the minimum of the range is accrued. We do not reduce these liabilities for potential insurance or third-party recoveries. If applicable, we accrue receivables for probable insurance or other third-party recoveries. With respect to income-tax-related contingencies, we use a cumulative probability-weighted loss accrual in cases where sustaining a tax position is less than certain.

Based on currently available information, we believe it is remote that future costs related to known contingent liability exposures will exceed current accruals by an amount that would have a material adverse impact on our consolidated financial statements. As we learn new facts concerning contingencies, we reassess our position both with respect to accrued liabilities and other potential exposures. Estimates particularly sensitive to future changes include contingent liabilities recorded for environmental remediation, tax and legal matters. Estimated future environmental remediation costs are subject to change due to such factors as the uncertain magnitude of cleanup costs, the unknown time and extent of such remedial actions that may be required, and the determination of our liability in proportion to that of other responsible parties. Estimated future costs related to tax and legal matters are subject to change as events evolve and as additional information becomes available during the administrative and litigation processes. For information on other contingencies, see Note 11—Contingencies and Commitments, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Legal Matters

We are subject to various lawsuits and claims including but not limited to matters involving oil and gas royalty and severance tax payments, gas measurement and valuation methods, contract disputes, environmental damages, personal injury, and property damage. Our primary exposures for such matters relate to alleged royalty underpayments on certain federal, state and privately owned properties and claims of alleged environmental contamination from historic operations. We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously in these matters.

 

48


Table of Contents

Our legal organization applies its knowledge, experience and professional judgment to the specific characteristics of our cases, employing a litigation management process to manage and monitor the legal proceedings against us. Our process facilitates the early evaluation and quantification of potential exposures in individual cases. This process also enables us to track those cases that have been scheduled for trial and/or mediation. Based on professional judgment and experience in using these litigation management tools and available information about current developments in all our cases, our legal organization regularly assesses the adequacy of current accruals and determines if adjustment of existing accruals, or establishment of new accruals, is required.

Environmental

We are subject to the same numerous international, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations as other companies in our industry. For a discussion of the most significant of these environmental laws and regulations, including those with associated remediation obligations, see the “Environmental” section in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on pages 59–61 of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We occasionally receive requests for information or notices of potential liability from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state environmental agencies alleging that we are a potentially responsible party under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) or an equivalent state statute. On occasion, we also have been made a party to cost recovery litigation by those agencies or by private parties. These requests, notices and lawsuits assert potential liability for remediation costs at various sites that typically are not owned by us, but allegedly contain wastes attributable to our past operations. As of September 30, 2015, there were 13 sites around the United States in which we were identified as a potentially responsible party under CERCLA and comparable state laws.

At September 30, 2015, our balance sheet included a total environmental accrual of $286 million, compared with $344 million at December 31, 2014, for remediation activities in the United States and Canada. We expect to incur a substantial amount of these expenditures within the next 30 years.

Notwithstanding any of the foregoing, and as with other companies engaged in similar businesses, environmental costs and liabilities are inherent concerns in our operations and products, and there can be no assurance that material costs and liabilities will not be incurred. However, we currently do not expect any material adverse effect upon our results of operations or financial position as a result of compliance with current environmental laws and regulations.

Climate Change

There has been a broad range of proposed or promulgated state, national and international laws focusing on greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction. These proposed or promulgated laws apply or could apply in countries where we have interests or may have interests in the future. Laws in this field continue to evolve, and while it is not possible to accurately estimate either a timetable for implementation or our future compliance costs relating to implementation, such laws, if enacted, could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial condition. Examples of legislation and precursors for possible regulation that do or could affect our operations include the EPA’s announcement on March 29, 2010 (published as “Interpretation of Regulations that Determine Pollutants Covered by Clean Air Act Permitting Programs,” 75 Fed. Reg. 17004 (April 2, 2010)) and the EPA’s and U.S. Department of Transportation’s joint promulgation of a Final Rule on April 1, 2010, that trigger regulation of GHGs under the Clean Air Act, may trigger more climate-based claims for damages, and may result in longer agency review time for development projects.

For other examples of legislation or precursors for possible regulation and factors on which the ultimate impact on our financial performance will depend, see the “Climate Change” section in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on pages 61–62 of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

49


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE “SAFE HARBOR” PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This report includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All statements other than statements of historical fact included or incorporated by reference in this report, including, without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected revenues, projected costs and plans, and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. You can identify our forward-looking statements by the words “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “budget,” “continue,” “could,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “seek,” “should,” “will,” “would,” “expect,” “objective,” “projection,” “forecast,” “goal,” “guidance,” “outlook,” “effort,” “target” and similar expressions.

We based the forward-looking statements on our current expectations, estimates and projections about ourselves and the industries in which we operate in general. We caution you these statements are not guarantees of future performance as they involve assumptions that, while made in good faith, may prove to be incorrect, and involve risks and uncertainties we cannot predict. In addition, we based many of these forward-looking statements on assumptions about future events that may prove to be inaccurate. Accordingly, our actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what we have expressed or forecast in the forward-looking statements. Any differences could result from a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

   

Fluctuations in crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids prices.

   

Potential failures or delays in achieving expected reserve or production levels from existing and future oil and gas developments due to operating hazards, drilling risks and the inherent uncertainties in predicting reserves and reservoir performance.

   

Inability to maintain reserves replacement rates consistent with prior periods.

   

Unsuccessful exploratory drilling activities or the inability to obtain access to exploratory acreage.

   

Unexpected changes in costs or technical requirements for constructing, modifying or operating exploration and production facilities.

   

Legislative and regulatory initiatives further regulating hydraulic fracturing, methane emissions, flaring or water disposal.

   

Lack of, or disruptions in, adequate and reliable transportation for our crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids.

   

Inability to timely obtain or maintain permits, including those necessary for drilling and/or development, construction of LNG terminals or regasification facilities; comply with government regulations; or make capital expenditures required to maintain compliance.

   

Failure to complete definitive agreements and feasibility studies for, and to timely complete construction of, announced and future exploration and production and LNG development.

   

Potential disruption or interruption of our operations due to accidents, extraordinary weather events, civil unrest, political events, terrorism, cyber attacks or infrastructure constraints or disruptions.

   

International monetary conditions and exchange controls.

   

Substantial investment or reduced demand for products as a result of existing or future environmental rules and regulations, use of competing energy sources or the development of alternative energy sources.

   

Liability for remedial actions, including removal and reclamation obligations, under environmental regulations.

   

Liability resulting from litigation.

   

General domestic and international economic and political developments, including armed hostilities; expropriation of assets; changes in governmental policies relating to crude oil, bitumen, natural gas, LNG and natural gas liquids pricing, regulation or taxation; other political, economic or diplomatic developments; and international monetary fluctuations.

   

Volatility in the commodity futures markets.

   

Changes in tax and other laws, regulations (including alternative energy mandates), or royalty rules applicable to our business.

 

50


Table of Contents
   

Competition in the oil and gas exploration and production industry.

   

Limited access to capital or significantly higher cost of capital related to illiquidity or uncertainty in the domestic or international financial markets.

   

Delays in, or our inability to, execute asset dispositions.

   

Inability to obtain economical financing for development, construction or modification of facilities and general corporate purposes.

   

The operation and financing of our joint ventures.

   

The ability of our customers and other contractual counterparties to satisfy their obligations to us.

   

The factors generally described in Item 1A—Risk Factors in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K and additional risks described in our other filings with the SEC.

 

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Information about market risks for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, does not differ materially from that discussed under Item 7A in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Item 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure information required to be disclosed in reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of September 30, 2015, with the participation of our management, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and our Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) carried out an evaluation, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Act, of ConocoPhillips’ disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Act). Based upon that evaluation, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and our Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer concluded our disclosure controls and procedures were operating effectively as of September 30, 2015.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Act, in the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

51


Table of Contents

Item 6. EXHIBITS

 

3.1    Amended and Restated By-Laws of ConocoPhillips, as amended and restated as of October 9, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report of ConocoPhillips on Form 8-K filed on October 13, 2015; File No. 001-32395).
10.1*    Form of Key Employee Award Terms and Conditions, as part of the ConocoPhillips Targeted Variable Long Term Incentive Program, granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips, dated September 3, 2015.
12*    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
31.1*    Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
31.2*    Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
32*    Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
101.INS*    XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH*    XBRL Schema Document.
101.CAL*    XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB*    XBRL Labels Linkbase Document.
101.PRE*    XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF*    XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.

* Filed herewith.

 

52


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

CONOCOPHILLIPS
/s/ Glenda M. Schwarz

Glenda M. Schwarz

Vice President and Controller

(Chief Accounting and Duly Authorized Officer)

November 3, 2015

 

53

Exhibit 10.1

 

LOGO

TARGETED VARIABLE LONG TERM INCENTIVE PROGRAM

SEPTEMBER 3, 2015

KEY EMPLOYEE AWARD

TERMS AND CONDITIONS

This Key Employee Award Terms and Conditions describes terms and conditions of Restricted Stock Unit Awards, as part of the ConocoPhillips Targeted Variable Long Term Incentive Program (Program), granted under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan of ConocoPhillips (referred to as the Plan) by ConocoPhillips (the Company) to certain eligible Employees (Employees). These Terms and Conditions, together with the Annual Award Summary given to each Employee receiving an Award, form the Award Agreement (the Agreement) relating to the Awards described. The Agreement covers Restricted Stock Units granted under the Program, and the term Employee covers recipients of Awards under the Program.

 

1. Type and Size of Grant . Subject to the Plan and this Agreement, the Company grants to certain eligible Employees Restricted Stock Units. Individual awards will be as set forth in the Annual Award Summary given to each Employee to whom an Award is granted. The Annual Award Summary for each Employee is made a part of this Agreement with regard to such Employee.

 

2. Grant Date, Price, and Plan . The Grant Date and the Grant Price are set forth on the Award Summary given to each Employee to whom an Award is granted. Awards are made under the 2014 Omnibus Stock and Performance Incentive Plan.

 

3. Restrictions, Forfeiture, and Lapse of Restrictions . The Restricted Stock Units subject hereto may be canceled or forfeited as set forth herein. Except as otherwise noted in this Agreement, the following summary table describes restrictions and terms, forfeiture, and lapse of restrictions, subject to the more detailed provisions set forth below:

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 1 of 11


Summary Table

 

Summary of Termination Rules

 

Status

  

Termination Date

  

Forfeiture or Lapsing of Restrictions

Retirement (generally age 65 with at least 5 years of service, see Definitions section)

   Prior to 6 months from Grant Date    Canceled upon Termination
   6 months from Grant Date & after    Restrictions lapse on Termination date

Layoff

   Prior to 6 months from Grant Date    Canceled upon Termination
   6 months from Grant Date & after    Award is prorated and restrictions on remaining units lapse on Termination date

Disability

   Prior to 1 month from Grant Date    Canceled upon Termination
   1 month from Grant Date & after    Award is prorated and restrictions on remaining units lapse on Termination date

Death

   Prior to 1 month from Grant Date    Canceled upon Termination
   1 month from Grant Date & after    Award is prorated and restrictions on remaining units lapse on Termination date

Divestitures, outsourcing, and moves to joint ventures

   Any date after Grant Date    Canceled upon Termination, unless approval otherwise

All other Terminations

        Canceled upon Termination

 

(a) Restrictions and Terms .

 

  (i) The Award shall be held in escrow by the Company until the lapsing of restrictions placed upon the Award. The Employee shall not have the right to sell, transfer, assign, or otherwise dispose of Restricted Stock Units granted in an Award until the escrow is terminated. Except as set forth below, the Award shall be forfeited and the related Restricted Stock Units canceled upon the Employee’s Termination of Employment with the Company prior to the lapsing of restrictions. Restrictions shall lapse on one-third of the Restricted Stock Units granted in an Award (rounded down to the nearest whole share) on the first anniversary of the Grant Date; restrictions shall lapse on a further one- third of the Restricted Stock Units granted in an Award (rounded down to the nearest whole share) on the second anniversary of the Grant Date; and restrictions shall lapse on the remaining Restricted Stock Units granted in an Award on the third anniversary of the Grant Date. Upon the lapsing of restrictions, the number of shares of unrestricted Stock equal to the number of shares of Restricted Stock Units for which the restrictions have so lapsed shall be registered in the Employee’s name, and the related shares of Restricted Stock Units shall be canceled; provided, however, that in places where it is determined by the Administrator that payout in the form of unrestricted Stock is prohibited by law, regulation, or decree, or where the cost of legal compliance to issue the unrestricted Stock would be unreasonably expensive, the Fair Market Value of such unrestricted Stock shall be paid in cash instead of settlement of the Award in unrestricted Stock. Cash payouts are only permitted where such legal restrictions exist. Settlement of the Award in

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 2 of 11


  unrestricted Stock or cash payout, if any, shall be made upon the lapsing of restrictions on the Award, but, in any event, shall be made no later than March 15 of the year following the year in which such restrictions lapse.

 

  (ii) Restricted Stock Units do not have any voting rights or other rights generally associated with Stock, and are merely an obligation of the Company to make settlement in accordance with the terms and conditions applicable to such Restricted Stock Units. Restricted Stock Units granted to Employees under the Program shall not accrue or be paid a dividend equivalent.

 

(b) Termination of Employmen t.

 

  (i) General Rule for Termination . If, prior to the date on which restrictions lapse in accordance with the schedule set forth in the Award, the Employee’s employment with a Participating Company shall be terminated for any reason except death, Disability, Retirement, or Layoff, any Restricted Stock Units remaining in escrow pursuant to such Award shall be canceled and all rights thereunder shall cease; provided, however, that the Authorized Party may, in its or his sole discretion, determine that all or any portion of an Award shall not be canceled due to Termination of Employment.

 

  (ii) Layoff or Retirement Within Six Months . If, prior to a date six months from the Grant Date, the Employee’s employment with a Participating Company shall be terminated by reason of Layoff or Retirement, such Award shall be canceled and all rights thereunder shall cease.

 

  (iii) Layoff After Six Months . If, on or after a date six months from the Grant Date, the Employee’s employment with a Participating Company shall be terminated by reason of Layoff, the Employee shall retain a prorated number of the Restricted Stock Units of the Award. The number of Restricted Stock Units retained will be computed by multiplying the original number of Restricted Stock Units granted by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full months of employment from the first day of the month in which the Award was granted until the date the employee is terminated and the denominator of which is 36. Such calculation shall be rounded down to the nearest whole share. From this result the number of shares previously settled (or applied to tax withholding) from the Award shall be subtracted to determine the prorated Award. In such case, the restrictions on the prorated Award shall lapse on the date of Termination of the Employee from the employ of the Company and its subsidiaries, and settlement shall be made in accordance with the settlement provisions above. The remainder of the Award shall be canceled and all rights thereunder shall cease.

 

  (iv) Retirement After Six Months . If, on or after a date six months from the Grant Date, the Employee’s employment with a Participating Company shall be terminated by reason of Retirement, the Employee shall retain all rights provided by the Award at the time of such Termination of Employment. In such case, the restrictions on the Award shall lapse on the date of Termination of the Employee from the employ of the Company and its subsidiaries, and settlement shall be made in accordance with the settlement provisions above.

 

  (v) Disability . If, on or after a date one month from the Grant Date, an Employee shall terminate employment following Disability of the Employee, the Employee shall retain a prorated number of the Award shares or units granted. The number of Award shares or units retained will be computed by multiplying the original number of Award shares or units granted by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full months of employment from the first day of the month in which the Award was granted until the date the employee is terminated and the denominator of which is 36. Such calculation shall be rounded down to the nearest whole share. From this result the number of shares previously settled (or applied to tax withholding) from the Award shall be subtracted to determine the prorated Award. In such case, the restrictions on the prorated Award shall

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 3 of 11


  lapse on the date of Termination of the Employee from the employ of the Company and its subsidiaries, and settlement shall be made in accordance with the settlement provisions above. The remainder of the Award shall be canceled and all rights thereunder shall cease.

 

  (vi) Death . If, on or after a date one month from the Grant Date, an Employee shall die while in the employ of a Participating Company , the executor or administrator of the estate of the Employee or the person or persons to whom the Award shall have been validly transferred by the executor or the administrator pursuant to will or the laws of descent and distribution shall have the right to settlement of the Award to the same extent the Employee would have, had the Employee not died. In such case, the restrictions on a prorated number of the Restricted Stock Units granted in the Award shall lapse upon the determination of death by the Administrator, and settlement shall be made in accordance with the settlement provisions above. The number of Award shares or units retained will be computed by multiplying the original number of Award shares or units granted by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of full months of employment from the first day of the month in which the Award was granted until the date the employee is terminated and the denominator of which is 36. Such calculation shall be rounded down to the nearest whole share. From this result the number of shares previously settled (or applied to tax withholding) from the Award shall be subtracted to determine the prorated Award. In such case, the restrictions on the prorated Award shall lapse on the date of Termination of the Employee from the employ of the Company and its subsidiaries, and settlement shall be made in accordance with the settlement provisions above. The remainder of the Award shall be canceled and all rights thereunder shall cease. No transfer of an Award, or of the unrestricted Stock or other proceeds of an Award, by the Employee by will or by the laws of descent and distribution shall be effective to bind the Company unless the Administrator shall have been furnished with written notice thereof and a copy of the will and such other evidence as the Administrator may deem necessary to establish the validity of the transfer and the acceptance by the transferee or transferees of the terms and conditions of such Award.

 

  (vii) Transfers and Leaves . Transfer of employment between Participating Companies shall not constitute Termination of Employment for the purpose of any Award granted under the Program. Whether any leave of absence shall constitute Termination of Employment for the purposes of any Award granted under the Program shall be determined by the Administrator, in each case in accordance with applicable law and by application of the policies and procedures adopted by the Company in relation to such leave of absence.

 

  (viii) Divestiture, Outsourcing, or Move to Joint Venture . If, after the Grant Date, an Employee ceases to be employed by Participating Company as a result of (a) the outsourcing of a function, (b) the sale or transfer of all or a portion of the equity interest of such Participating Company (removing it from the controlled group of companies of which the Company is a part), (c) the sale of all or substantially all of the assets of such Participating Company to another employer outside of the controlled group of corporations (whether the Employee is offered employment or accepts employment with the other employer), (d) the Termination of the Employee by a Participating Company followed by employment within a reasonable time with a company or other entity in which the Company owns, directly or indirectly, at least a 50% interest, prior to exercise of an Award, or (e) any other sale of assets determined by the Authorized Party to be considered a divestiture under this program, the Authorized Party may, in its or his sole discretion, determine that all or a portion of any such Award shall not be canceled. In such cases, the restrictions on the Award shall lapse on the date of Termination of the Employee from the employ of the Company and its subsidiaries, and settlement shall be made in accordance with the settlement provisions above.

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 4 of 11


  (ix) Change of Control . In the event of a Change of Control, as defined hereafter, unless explicitly provided otherwise in the applicable Award Agreement, all restrictions and other limitations applicable to any Restricted Stock Units granted in any Award shall remain in effect and will lapse in accordance with other provisions of this Award Agreement. Settlement in unrestricted Stock or cash shall be made at the same times and upon the same events as it would otherwise have been made in accordance with the settlement provisions above.

 

  (x) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event that this Award or any rights associated with this Award are includible in income pursuant to section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, settlement of the Award or any other distribution hereunder due to Separation from Service with the Company and its subsidiaries shall not be made to a “specified employee” (as that term is defined in section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i)) prior to six months after the specified employee’s Separation from Service from the Company and its subsidiaries (or, if earlier, the date of death of the specified employee).

 

(c) Detrimental Activities and Suspension of Award .

 

  (i) If the Authorized Party determines that, subsequent to the grant of any Award, the Employee has engaged or is engaging in any activity which, in the sole judgment of the Authorized Party, is or may be detrimental to the Company or a subsidiary, the Authorized Party may cancel all or part of the Restricted Stock Units held in escrow pursuant to the Award or Awards granted to that Employee.

 

  (ii) If the Authorized Party, in its or his sole discretion, determines that the lapsing of restrictions on Restricted Stock Units held in escrow pursuant to any Award has the possibility of violating any law, regulation, or decree pertaining to the Company, any of its subsidiaries, or the Employee, the Authorized Party may freeze or suspend the Employee’s right to settlement or payout of the Award until such time as the lapse of restrictions would no longer, in the sole discretion of the Authorized Party, have the possibility of violating such law, regulation, or decree.

 

  (iii) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, any Award is subject to forfeiture or recoupment, in whole or in part, under applicable law, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act.

 

4. Assignment of Award Upon Death . Rights under the Plans and this Agreement cannot be assigned or transferred other than by (i) will or (ii) the laws of descent and distribution.

 

5. Tax Withholding . In all cases the Employee will be responsible to pay all required withholding taxes associated with an Award. Should a withholding tax obligation arise with regard to an Award or the lapsing of restrictions on Restricted Stock Units granted in an Award, the withholding tax may be satisfied by withholding units or shares of Stock. The value of the units or shares of Stock withheld for this purpose shall be an amount consistent with applicable laws and regulations. In cases where a withholding tax obligation arises prior to the lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock Units granted in an Award, the withholding tax may be satisfied instead by other methods determined by the Administrator, such as payment of cash by the Employee or, if agreed by the Employee, payroll withholding. In cases where payment by payroll withholding cannot be made due to circumstances arising after the election or where the Administrator has determined that such withholding would violate any applicable law, regulation, or decree, shares of Stock shall be withheld instead. When necessary, lapsing of restrictions may be accelerated by the Authorized Party to the extent necessary to provide shares of Stock to satisfy any withholding tax obligation. This withholding tax obligation includes, but is not limited to, federal, state, and local taxes, including applicable non-U.S. taxes such as U.K. PAYE.

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 5 of 11


6. Shareholder Rights for Restricted Stock Units . The Employee shall not have the rights of a shareholder until the Restricted Stock Unit has been canceled and ownership of shares of Stock has been transferred to the Employee.

 

7. Certain Adjustments . In the event certain corporate transactions, recapitalizations, or stock splits occur while Restricted Stock Units are outstanding, the Grant Price and the number of Restricted Stock Units shall be correspondingly adjusted.

 

8. Relationship to the Plan . In addition to the terms and conditions described in this Agreement, Awards are subject to all other applicable provisions of the Plan. The decisions of the Committee with respect to questions arising as to the interpretation of the Plan or this Agreement or as to findings of fact, shall be final, conclusive, and binding.

 

9. No Employment Guarantee . No provision of this Agreement shall confer any right upon the Employee to continued employment with any Participating Company.

 

10. Governing Law . This Agreement shall be governed by, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.

 

11. Amendment . Without the consent of the Employee, this Agreement may be amended or supplemented (i) to cure any ambiguity or to correct or supplement any provision herein which may be defective or inconsistent with any other provision herein, or (ii) to add to the covenants and agreements of the Company for the benefit of an Employee or to add to the rights of an Employee or to surrender any right or power reserved to or conferred upon the Company in this Agreement, provided, in each case, that such changes or corrections shall not adversely affect the rights of the Employee with respect to the grant of an Award evidenced hereby without the Employee’s consent, or (iii) to make such other changes as the Company, upon advice of counsel, determines are necessary or advisable because of the adoption or promulgation of, or change in or of the interpretation of, any law or governmental rule or regulation, including any applicable federal or state securities or tax laws.

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 6 of 11


DEFINITIONS

Capitalized terms not defined below shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan.

“Authorized Party” means the person who is authorized to approve an Award, exercise discretion or take action under the Administrative Procedure for the Restricted Stock Program and pursuant to the Program. With regard to Senior Officers, the Committee is the Authorized Party. With regard to other Employees, the Chief Executive Officer, acting as the Special Equity Award Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, is the Authorized Party, although the Committee may act concurrently as the Authorized Party.

“Award” means any Restricted Stock Units granted to an Employee pursuant to such applicable terms, conditions, and limitations as the Authorized Party may establish in order to fulfill the objectives of the Program.

“Change of Control” has the meaning set forth in Attachment A to these Terms and Conditions.

“Committee” means the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company, or any successor committee to it.

“Company” means ConocoPhillips, a Delaware corporation.

“Disability” means a disability for which the employee in question has been determined to be entitled to either (i) benefits under the applicable plan of long-term disability of the Company or its subsidiaries or (ii) disability benefits under the Social Security Act. In the absence of any such determination, the Authorized Party may make a determination that the employee has a Disability.

“Fair Market Value” means, as of a particular date, the mean between the highest and lowest sales price per share of such Stock on the consolidated transaction reporting system for the principal national securities exchange on which shares of Stock are listed on that date, or, if there shall have been no such sale so reported on that date, on the next preceding date on which such a sale was so reported, or, at the discretion of the Committee, the price prevailing on the exchange at a designated time.

“Grant Price” means the Fair Market Value for one share of Stock as of the date of the grant of an Award. Grant Price is not adjusted for any restrictions applicable to the Award.

“Layoff” means an applicable Termination of Employment due to layoff under the ConocoPhillips Severance Pay Plan, the ConocoPhillips Executive Severance Plan, or the ConocoPhillips Key Employee Change in Control Severance Plan, or layoff or redundancy under any similar layoff or redundancy plan which the Company or its subsidiaries may adopt from time to time. If all or any portion of the benefits under the redundancy or layoff plan are contingent on the employee’s signing a general release of liability, such Termination shall not be considered as a “Layoff” for purposes of this Award unless the employee executes and does not revoke a general release of liability, acceptable to the Company, under the terms of such layoff or redundancy plan. In order to be considered a layoff for purposes of this Award, the Termination of Employment must also be considered a Separation from Service.

“Participating Company” includes ConocoPhillips and its 100% owned subsidiaries, including both those directly owned and those owned through subsidiaries, whose participation has been approved by the Authorized Party.

“Restricted Stock Unit” means a unit equal to one share of Stock (as determined by the Authorized Party) that is subject to forfeiture provisions or that has certain restrictions attached to the ownership thereof.

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 7 of 11


“Retirement” means Termination at age 65 or older with a minimum of 5 years’ service with a Participating Company with regard to Employees on the United States payroll. For Employees not on the United States payroll, Retirement means Termination at the earlier of: a) age 65 or older with a minimum of 5 years’ service with a Participating Company, or b) the government or company imposed mandatory retirement age with a minimum of 5 years’ service with a Participating Company. Service is defined by the policies of the Participating Company.

“Senior Officer” means the Chairman of the Board, the CEO, all other executive officers of the Company (determined in accordance with the Company’s custom and practice pursuant to section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), all other employees of the Company who report directly to the CEO and whose salary grade is 23 or higher, and all other employees of the Company whose salary grade is 26 or higher.

“Separation from Service” means “separation from service” as that term is used in section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

“Stock” means shares of common stock of the Company, par value $.01. Stock may also be referred to as “Common Stock.”

“Termination” and “Termination of Employment” means cessation of employment with the Participating Companies, determined in accordance with the policies and practices of the Participating Company for whom the Employee was last performing services.

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 8 of 11


Attachment A

Change of Control

The following definitions apply to the Change of Control provision in Section 10 of the Plan.

“Affiliate” shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 12b-2 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act, as in effect at the time of determination.

“Associate” shall mean, with reference to any Person, (a) any corporation, firm, partnership, association, unincorporated organization or other entity (other than the Company or a subsidiary of the Company) of which such Person is an officer or general partner (or officer or general partner of a general partner) or is, directly or indirectly, the Beneficial Owner of 10% or more of any class of equity securities, (b) any trust or other estate in which such Person has a substantial beneficial interest or as to which such Person serves as trustee or in a similar fiduciary capacity and (c) any relative or spouse of such Person, or any relative of such spouse, who has the same home as such Person.

“Beneficial Owner” shall mean, with reference to any securities, any Person if:

(a) such Person or any of such Person’s Affiliates and Associates, directly or indirectly, is the “beneficial owner” of (as determined pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act, as in effect at the time of determination) such securities or otherwise has the right to vote or dispose of such securities;

(b) such Person or any of such Person’s Affiliates and Associates, directly or indirectly, has the right or obligation to acquire such securities (whether such right or obligation is exercisable or effective immediately or only after the passage of time or the occurrence of an event) pursuant to any agreement, arrangement or understanding (whether or not in writing) or upon the exercise of conversion rights, exchange rights, other rights, warrants or options, or otherwise; provided, however, that a Person shall not be deemed the Beneficial Owner of, or to “beneficially own,” (i) securities tendered pursuant to a tender or exchange offer made by such Person or any of such Person’s Affiliates or Associates until such tendered securities are accepted for purchase or exchange or (ii) securities issuable upon exercise of Exempt Rights; or

(c) such Person or any of such Person’s Affiliates or Associates (i) has any agreement, arrangement or understanding (whether or not in writing) with any other Person (or any Affiliate or Associate thereof) that beneficially owns such securities for the purpose of acquiring, holding, voting (except as set forth in the proviso to subsection (a) of this definition) or disposing of such securities or (ii) is a member of a group (as that term is used in Rule 13d-5(b) of the General Rules and Regulations under the Exchange Act) that includes any other Person that beneficially owns such securities;

provided, however, that nothing in this definition shall cause a Person engaged in business as an underwriter of securities to be the Beneficial Owner of, or to “beneficially own,” any securities acquired through such Person’s participation in good faith in a firm commitment underwriting until the expiration of 40 days after the date of such acquisition. For purposes hereof, “voting” a security shall include voting, granting a proxy, consenting or making a request or demand relating to corporate action (including, without limitation, a demand for a shareholder list, to call a shareholder meeting or to inspect corporate books and records) or otherwise giving an authorization (within the meaning of section 14(a) of the Exchange Act) in respect of such security.

The terms “beneficially own” and “beneficially owning” shall have meanings that are correlative to this definition of the term Beneficial Owner.

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 9 of 11


“Board” shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan.

“Change of Control” shall mean any of the following occurring on or after January 1, 2015:

(a) any Person (other than an Exempt Person) shall become the Beneficial Owner of 20% or more of the shares of Common Stock then outstanding or 20% or more of the combined voting power of the Voting Stock of the Company then outstanding; provided, however, that no Change of Control shall be deemed to occur for purposes of this subsection (a) if such Person shall become a Beneficial Owner of 20% or more of the shares of Common Stock then outstanding or 20% or more of the combined voting power of the Voting Stock of the Company then outstanding solely as a result of (i) any acquisition directly from the Company or (ii) any acquisition by a Person pursuant to a transaction that complies with clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of subsection (c) of this definition;

(b) individuals who, as of January 1, 2015, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board; provided, however, that any individual becoming a director subsequent to January 1, 2015, whose election, or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be considered as though such individual were a member of the Incumbent Board; provided, further, that there shall be excluded, for this purpose, any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs as a result of any actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of a Person other than the Board;

(c) the Company shall consummate a reorganization, merger, statutory share exchange, consolidation, or similar transaction involving the Company or any of its subsidiaries or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company, or the acquisition of assets or securities of another entity by the Company or any of its subsidiaries (a “Business Combination”), in each case, unless, following such Business Combination, (i) 50% or more of the then outstanding shares of common stock of the corporation, or common equity securities of an entity other than a corporation, resulting from such Business Combination and the combined voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock of such corporation or other entity are beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, by all or substantially all of the Persons who were the Beneficial Owners of the outstanding Common Stock immediately prior to such Business Combination in substantially the same proportions as their ownership, immediately prior to such Business Combination, of the outstanding Common Stock, (ii) no Person (excluding any Exempt Person or any Person beneficially owning, immediately prior to such Business Combination, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of the Common Stock then outstanding or 20% or more of the combined voting power of the Voting Stock of the Company then outstanding) beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, 20% or more of the then outstanding shares of common stock of the corporation, or common equity securities of an entity other than a corporation, resulting from such Business Combination or the combined voting power of the then outstanding Voting Stock of such corporation or other entity, and (iii) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the corporation, or the body which is most analogous to the board of directors of a corporation if not a corporation, resulting from such Business Combination were members of the Incumbent Board at the time of the initial agreement or initial action by the Board providing for such Business Combination; or

(d) the shareholders of the Company shall approve a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company unless such liquidation or dissolution is approved as part of a transaction that complies with clauses (i), (ii), and (iii) of subsection (c) of this definition.

“Common Stock” shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan.

“Company” shall have the meaning set forth in the Plan.

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 10 of 11


“Exchange Act” shall mean the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

“Exempt Person” shall mean any of the Company, any entity controlled by the Company, any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any entity controlled by the Company, and any Person organized, appointed, or established by the Company for or pursuant to the terms of any such employee benefit plan.

“Exempt Rights” shall mean any rights to purchase shares of Common Stock or other Voting Stock of the Company if at the time of the issuance thereof such rights are not separable from such Common Stock or other Voting Stock ( i.e. , are not transferable otherwise than in connection with a transfer of the underlying Common Stock or other Voting Stock), except upon the occurrence of a contingency, whether such rights exist as of January 1, 2015, or are thereafter issued by the Company as a dividend on shares of Common Stock or other Voting Securities or otherwise.

“Person” shall mean any individual, firm, corporation, partnership, association, trust, unincorporated organization, or other entity.

“Voting Stock” shall mean, (1) with respect to a corporation, all securities of such corporation of any class or series that are entitled to vote generally in the election of, or to appoint by contract, directors of such corporation (excluding any class or series that would be entitled so to vote by reason of the occurrence of any contingency, so long as such contingency has not occurred) and (ii) with respect to an entity which is not a corporation, all securities of any class or series that are entitled to vote generally in the election of, or to appoint by contract, members of the body which is most analogous to the board of directors of a corporation.

 

Effective 9/3/2015

 

Page 11 of 11

Exhibit 12

CONOCOPHILLIPS AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES

TOTAL ENTERPRISE

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

 

                             
     Millions of Dollars  
     Nine Months Ended
September  30
 
     2015     2014  
  

 

 

 

Earnings Available for Fixed Charges

    

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and noncontrolling interests that have not incurred fixed charges

   $ (2,232     9,656   

Distributions greater (less) than equity in earnings of affiliates

     (79     334

Fixed charges, excluding capitalized interest**

     849        614   

 

 
   $ (1,462     10,604   

 

 
    

Fixed Charges

    

Interest and debt expense, excluding capitalized interest

   $ 652        475   

Capitalized interest

     255        372   

Interest portion of rental expense

     86        57   

 

 
   $ 993        904   

 

 

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges***

            11.7   

 

 
* Includes a significant distribution from a Canadian joint venture.
** Includes amortization of capitalized interest totaling approximately $111 million in 2015 and $82 million in 2014.
*** Earnings for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2015 were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $2,455 million.

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Ryan M. Lance, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ConocoPhillips;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

November 3, 2015

 

/s/ Ryan M. Lance
Ryan M. Lance

Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Jeff W. Sheets, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ConocoPhillips;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

  (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

November 3, 2015

 

/s/ Jeff W. Sheets
Jeff W. Sheets

Executive Vice President, Finance and

Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ConocoPhillips (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2015, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

 

  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

November 3, 2015

 

/s/ Ryan M. Lance
Ryan M. Lance

Chairman and

Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Jeff W. Sheets
Jeff W. Sheets

Executive Vice President, Finance and

Chief Financial Officer