RISK FACTORS

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following information, together with other information in this prospectus, before buying shares of our common stock. If any of the following risks or uncertainties actually occur, our business, financial condition, prospects, results of operations and cash flow could be materially adversely affected. Additional risks or uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we deem immaterial, may also impair our business operations. We cannot assure you that any of the events discussed in the risk factors below will not occur. In that case, the market price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or a part of your investment.

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Various operating factors and general economic conditions affecting the food retail industry may affect our business and may adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our operations and financial performance are affected by economic conditions such as macroeconomic conditions, credit market conditions and the level of consumer confidence. While the combination of improved economic conditions, the trend towards lower unemployment, higher wages and lower gasoline prices have contributed to improved consumer confidence, there is continued uncertainty about the strength of the economic recovery. If the economy does not continue to improve or if it weakens, or if gasoline prices rebound, consumers may reduce spending, trade down to a less expensive mix of products or increasingly rely on food discounters, all of which could impact our sales. In addition, consumers’ perception or uncertainty related to the economic recovery and future fuel prices could also dampen overall consumer confidence and reduce demand for our product offerings. Both inflation and deflation affect our business. Food deflation could reduce sales growth and earnings, while food inflation could reduce gross profit margins. We are unable to predict if the economy will continue to improve or predict the rate at which the economy may improve or the direction of gasoline prices. If the economy does not continue to improve or if it weakens or fuel prices increase, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Competition in our industry is intense, and our failure to compete successfully may adversely affect our profitability and results of operations.

The food and drug retail industry is large and dynamic, characterized by intense competition among a collection of local, regional and national participants. We face strong competition from other food and/or drug retailers, supercenters, club stores, discount stores, online providers, specialty and niche supermarkets, drug stores, general merchandisers, wholesale stores, convenience stores and restaurants. Shifts in the competitive landscape, consumer preference or market share may have an adverse effect on our profitability and results of operations.

As a result of consumers’ growing desire to shop online, we also face increasing competition from both our existing competitors who have incorporated the internet as a direct-to-consumer channel and internet-only providers that sell grocery products. Although we have a growing internet presence and offer our customers the ability to shop online for both home delivery and in-store pick-up, there is no assurance that these online initiatives will be successful. In addition, these initiatives may have an adverse impact on our profitability as a result of lower gross profits or greater operating costs to compete.

Our ability to attract customers is dependent, in large part, upon a combination of channel preference, location, store conditions, quality, price, service and selection. In each of these areas, traditional and non-traditional competitors compete with us and may successfully attract our customers to their stores by matching or exceeding what we offer. In recent years, many of our competitors have

23

Table of Contents

added locations and adopted a multi-channel approach to marketing and advertising. Our responses to competitive pressures, such as additional promotions, increased advertising, additional capital investment and the development of our internet offerings, could adversely affect our profitability and cash flow. We cannot guarantee that our competitive response will succeed in increasing or maintaining our share of retail food sales.

An increasingly competitive industry and a low level of inflation in food prices have made it difficult for food retailers to achieve positive identical store sales growth on a consistent basis. Our competitors have attempted to maintain or grow their share of retail food sales through capital and price investment, increased promotional activity and new store growth, creating a more difficult environment to consistently increase year-over-year sales. Several of our primary competitors are larger than we are or have greater financial resources available to them and, therefore, may be able to devote greater resources to invest in price, promotional activity and new or remodeled stores in order to grow their share of retail food sales. Price investment by our competitors has also, from time to time, adversely affected our operating margins. In recent years, we have invested in price in order to remain competitive and generate sales growth; however, there can be no assurance this strategy will continue to be successful.

Because we face intense competition, we need to anticipate and respond to changing consumer preferences and demands more effectively than our competitors. We devote significant resources to differentiating our banners in the local markets where we operate and invest in loyalty programs to drive traffic. Our local merchandising teams spend considerable time working with store directors to make sure we are satisfying consumer preferences. In addition, we strive to achieve and maintain favorable recognition of our own brands and offerings, and market these offerings to consumers and maintain and enhance a perception of value for consumers. While we seek to continuously respond to changing consumer preferences, there is no assurances that our responses will be successful.

Our continued success is dependent upon our ability to control operating expenses, including managing health care and pension costs stipulated by our collective bargaining agreements to effectively compete in the food retail industry. Several of our primary competitors are larger than we are, or are not subject to collective bargaining agreements, allowing them to more effectively leverage their fixed costs or more easily reduce operating expenses. Finally, we need to source, market and merchandise efficiently. Changes in our product mix also may negatively affect our profitability. Failure to accomplish our objectives could impair our ability to compete successfully and adversely affect our profitability.

Profit margins in the food retail industry are low. In order to increase or maintain our profit margins, we develop operating strategies to increase revenues, increase gross margins and reduce costs, such as new marketing programs, new advertising campaigns, productivity improvements, shrink reduction initiatives, distribution center efficiencies, manufacturing efficiencies, energy efficiency programs and other similar strategies. Our failure to achieve forecasted revenue growth, gross margin improvement or cost reductions could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and operating results.

Increased commodity prices may adversely impact our profitability.

Many of our own and sourced products include ingredients such as wheat, corn, oils, milk, sugar, proteins, cocoa and other commodities. Commodity prices worldwide have been volatile. Any increase in commodity prices may cause an increase in our input costs or the prices our vendors seek from us. Although we typically are able to pass on modest commodity price increases or mitigate vendor efforts to increase our costs, we may be unable to continue to do so, either in whole or in part, if commodity prices increase materially. If we are forced to increase prices, our customers may reduce their purchases at our stores or trade down to less profitable products. Both may adversely impact our profitability as a result of reduced revenue or reduced margins.

24

Table of Contents

Fuel prices and availability may adversely affect our results of operations.

We currently operate 379 fuel centers that are adjacent to many of our store locations. As a result, we sell a significant amount of gasoline. Increased regulation or significant increases in wholesale fuel costs could result in lower gross profit on fuel sales, and demand could be affected by retail price increases as well as by concerns about the effect of emissions on the environment. We are unable to predict future regulations, environmental effects, political unrest, acts of terrorism and other matters that may affect the cost and availability of fuel, and how our customers will react, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Our stores rely heavily on sales of perishable products, and product supply disruptions may have an adverse effect on our profitability and operating results.

Reflecting consumer preferences, we have a significant focus on perishable products. Sales of perishable products accounted for approximately 40.6% of our total sales in fiscal 2014. We rely on various suppliers and vendors to provide and deliver our perishable product inventory on a continuous basis. We could suffer significant perishable product inventory losses and significant lost revenue in the event of the loss of a major supplier or vendor, disruption of our distribution network, extended power outages, natural disasters or other catastrophic occurrences.

Severe weather and natural disasters may adversely affect our business.

Severe weather conditions such as hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, extended winter storms, heat waves or tornadoes, as well as other natural disasters, in areas in which we have stores or distribution centers or from which we source or obtain products may cause physical damage to our properties, closure of one or more of our stores, manufacturing facilities or distribution centers, lack of an adequate work force in a market, temporary disruption in the manufacture of products, temporary disruption in the supply of products, disruption in the transport of goods, delays in the delivery of goods to our distribution centers or stores, a reduction in customer traffic and a reduction in the availability of products in our stores. In addition, adverse climate conditions and adverse weather patterns, such as drought or flood, that impact growing conditions and the quantity and quality of crops yielded by food producers may adversely affect the availability or cost of certain products within the grocery supply chain. Any of these factors may disrupt our business and adversely affect our business.

Threats or potential threats to security of food and drug safety, the occurrence of a widespread health epidemic or regulatory concerns in our supply chain may adversely affect our business.

Acts or threats, whether perceived or real, of war or terror or other criminal activity directed at the food or drug store industry or the transportation industry, whether or not directly involving our stores, could increase our operating costs and operations, or impact general consumer behavior and consumer spending. Other events that give rise to actual or potential food contamination, drug contamination or food-borne illnesses, or a widespread regional, national or global health epidemic, such as pandemic flu, could have an adverse effect on our operating results or disrupt production and delivery of our products, our ability to appropriately staff our stores and potentially cause customers to avoid public gathering places or otherwise change their shopping behaviors.

We source our products from vendors and suppliers and related networks across the globe who may be subject to regulatory actions or face criticism due to actual or perceived social injustices, including human trafficking, child labor or environmental, health and safety violations. A disruption in our supply chain due to any regulatory action or social injustice could have an adverse impact on our supply chain and ultimately our business, including potential harm to our reputation.

25

Table of Contents

We could be affected if consumers lose confidence in the food supply chain or the quality and safety of our products.

We could be adversely affected if consumers lose confidence in the safety and quality of certain food products. Adverse publicity about these types of concerns, whether valid or not, may discourage consumers from buying our products or cause production and delivery disruptions. The real or perceived sale of contaminated food products by us could result in product liability claims, a loss of consumer confidence and product recalls, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Certain risks are inherent in providing pharmacy services, and our insurance may not be adequate to cover any claims against us.

We currently operate 1,738 in-store pharmacies, and, as a result, we are exposed to risks inherent in the packaging, dispensing, distribution, and disposal of pharmaceuticals and other healthcare products, such as risks of liability for products which cause harm to consumers, as well as increased regulatory risks and related costs. Although we maintain insurance, we cannot guarantee that the coverage limits under our insurance programs will be adequate to protect us against future claims, or that we will be able to maintain this insurance on acceptable terms in the future, or at all. Our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows may be materially adversely affected if in the future our insurance coverage proves to be inadequate or unavailable, or there is an increase in the liability for which we self-insure, or we suffer harm to our reputation as a result of an error or omission.

We are subject to numerous federal and state regulations. Each of our in-store pharmacies must be licensed by the state government. The licensing requirements vary from state to state. An additional registration certificate must be granted by the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (“DEA”), and, in some states, a separate controlled substance license must be obtained to dispense controlled substances. In addition, pharmacies selling controlled substances are required to maintain extensive records and often report information to state and federal agencies. If we fail to comply with existing or future laws and regulations, we could suffer substantial civil or criminal penalties, including the loss of our licenses to operate pharmacies and our ability to participate in federal and state healthcare programs. As a consequence of the severe penalties we could face, we must devote significant operational and managerial resources to complying with these laws and regulations.

In 2014, Safeway received two subpoenas from the DEA concerning its record keeping, reporting and related practices associated with the loss or theft of controlled substances. The two subpoenas have resulted in essentially a single investigation by the DEA. We are cooperating with the DEA on these matters. Application of federal and state laws and regulations could subject our current practices to allegations of impropriety or illegality, or could require us to make significant changes to our operations. In addition, we cannot predict the impact of future legislation and regulatory changes on our pharmacy business or assure that we will be able to obtain or maintain the regulatory approvals required to operate our business.

Integrating acquisitions may be time-consuming and create costs that could reduce our net income and cash flows.

Part of our strategy includes pursuing acquisitions that we believe will be accretive to our business. If we consummate an acquisition, the process of integrating the acquired business may be complex and time consuming, may be disruptive to the business and may cause an interruption of, or a distraction of management’s attention from, the business as a result of a number of obstacles, including but not limited to:

26

Table of Contents

Any of the foregoing obstacles, or a combination of them, could decrease gross profit margins or increase selling, general and administrative expenses in absolute terms and/or as a percentage of net sales, which could in turn negatively impact our net income and cash flows.

We may not be able to consummate acquisitions in the future on terms acceptable to us, or at all. In addition, future acquisitions are accompanied by the risk that the obligations and liabilities of an acquired company may not be adequately reflected in the historical financial statements of that company and the risk that those historical financial statements may be based on assumptions which are incorrect or inconsistent with our assumptions or approach to accounting policies. Any of these material obligations, liabilities or incorrect or inconsistent assumptions could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

A significant majority of our employees are unionized, and our relationship with unions, including labor disputes or work stoppages, could have an adverse impact on our operations and financial results.

As of February 28, 2015, approximately 174,000 of our employees were covered by collective bargaining agreements. During fiscal 2014, collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 50,000 employees were renegotiated. During fiscal 2015, collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 73,000 employees are scheduled to expire. In future negotiations with labor unions, we expect that health care, pension costs and/or contributions and wage costs, among other issues, will be important topics for negotiation. If, upon the expiration of such collective bargaining agreements, we are unable to negotiate acceptable contracts with labor unions, it could result in strikes by the affected workers and thereby significantly disrupt our operations. As part of our collective bargaining agreements, we may need to fund additional pension contributions, which would negatively impact our free cash flow. Further, if we are unable to control health care and pension costs provided for in the collective bargaining agreements, we may experience increased operating costs and an adverse impact on our financial results.

Increased pension expenses, contributions and surcharges may have an adverse impact on our financial results.

In connection with the Safeway acquisition, we assumed Safeway’s defined benefit retirement plans for substantially all Safeway employees not participating in multiemployer pension plans. We also assumed defined benefit retirement plans in connection with the United and NAI acquisitions. The funded status of these plans (the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the projected benefit obligation) is a significant factor in determining annual pension expense and cash contributions to fund the plans. In recent years, cash contributions have declined due to improved market conditions and the impact of the pension funding stabilization legislation, which increased the discount rate used to determine pension funding. However, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014, under a settlement agreement with the PBGC in connection with the closing of the Safeway acquisition, Safeway

27

Table of Contents

contributed $260 million to its largest pension plan. As a result, we do not expect to make additional contributions to this plan until 2018.

If financial markets do not continue to improve or if financial markets decline, increased pension expense and cash contributions may have an adverse impact on our financial results. Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), the PBGC has the authority to petition a court to terminate an underfunded pension plan under limited circumstances. In the event that our defined benefit pension plans are terminated for any reason, we could be liable to the PBGC for the entire amount of the underfunding, as calculated by the PBGC based on its own assumptions (which likely would result in a larger obligation than that based on the actuarial assumptions used to fund such plans). Under ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the liability under these defined benefit plans is joint and several with all members of the control group, such that each member of the control group would be liable for the defined benefit plans of each other member of the control group.

In addition, we participate in various multiemployer pension plans for substantially all employees represented by unions that require us to make contributions to these plans in amounts established under collective bargaining agreements. Under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the “PPA”), contributions in addition to those made pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement may be required in limited circumstances in the form of a surcharge that is equal to 5% of the contributions due in the first year and 10% each year thereafter until the applicable bargaining agreement expires.

Pension expenses for multiemployer pension plans are recognized by us as contributions are made. Benefits generally are based on a fixed amount for each year of service. Our contributions to multiemployer plans were $33.1 million, $74.2 million and $351.7 million during fiscal 2012, fiscal 2013 and, on a pro forma basis, fiscal 2014, respectively. In fiscal 2015, we expect to contribute approximately $370.0 million to multiemployer pension plans, subject to collective bargaining conditions, exclusive of additional amounts we may be required to contribute relating to A&P.

Based on an assessment of the most recent information available, the company believes that most of the multiemployer plans to which it contributes are underfunded. The company is only one of a number of employers contributing to these plans, and the underfunding is not a direct obligation or liability of the company. However, the company has attempted, as of February 28, 2015, to estimate its share of the underfunding of multiemployer plans to which the company contributes, based on the ratio of its contributions to the total of all contributions to these plans in a year. As of February 28, 2015, our estimate of the company’s share of the underfunding of multiemployer plans to which it contributes was $3.0 billion. The company’s share of underfunding described above is an estimate and could change based on the results of collective bargaining efforts, investment returns on the assets held in the plans, actions taken by trustees who manage the plans’ benefit payments, interest rates, if the employers currently contributing to these plans cease participation, and requirements under the PPA, the Multiemployer Pension Reform Act of 2014 and applicable provisions of the Code.

Additionally, underfunding of the multiemployer plans means that, in the event we were to exit certain markets or otherwise cease making contributions to these plans, we could trigger a substantial withdrawal liability. Any accrual for withdrawal liability will be recorded when a withdrawal is probable and can be reasonably estimated, in accordance with GAAP. All trades or businesses in the employer’s control group are jointly and severally liable for the employer’s withdrawal liability.

As a part of the Safeway acquisition, we assumed withdrawal liabilities related to Safeway’s previous closure of its Dominick’s division. The respective pension plans have asserted that we may become obligated to pay an estimated maximum withdrawal liability of approximately $510 million if one of the pension plans, the UFCW & Employers Midwest Pension Fund (the “UFCW Midwest Plan”),

28

Table of Contents

were to experience a mass withdrawal. A mass withdrawal would require monthly installment payments to be made by us in perpetuity. Our installment payments would be limited to 20 years if we are not part of, or the UFCW Midwest Plan does not experience, a mass withdrawal. Upon the Safeway acquisition, we recorded a $221.8 million multiemployer pension withdrawal liability related to Safeway’s withdrawal from these plans, a difference of $288.2 million from the maximum withdrawal liability. Our current estimate of the withdrawal liability is based on the fact that a mass withdrawal from the UFCW Midwest Plan has not occurred and our management’s belief that a mass withdrawal liability is remote. We are also disputing in arbitration certain factors used to determine the allocation of the unfunded vested benefits and therefore the annual pension payment installments due to the UFCW Midwest Plan. Our estimated liability reflects our best estimate of the probable outcome of this arbitration. Based on the current facts and circumstances, we believe it is reasonably possible that the estimated liability could change from the amount currently recorded as a result of the arbitration, but because our management believes that a mass withdrawal from the UFCW Midwest Plan is remote, it believes the payment of the maximum liability of $510 million is also remote.

On July 19, 2015, A&P filed a Chapter 11 petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court. Our company and A&P participate in four of the same multiemployer pension plans. The bankruptcy of A&P is expected to adversely affect the funding of these pension plans. Our subsidiary, Acme Markets, has purchased 71 A&P stores as of December 5, 2015, and we expect to acquire three additional stores during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. We purchased some but not all of the A&P stores that have contribution obligations to the four plans. Some of the A&P stores that we purchased contribute to five plans to which we do not contribute. We estimate that our share of the unfunded actuarial accrued liability in the four plans to which we and A&P have contributed increased by approximately $58 million for the stores we have acquired, and that the share of the unfunded actuarial accrued liability in the additional five plans attributable to the stores we have acquired is approximately $28 million. A&P and Acme Markets represent approximately 96% of all contributions to one of these plans (although there are approximately eight other contributing employers) and that plan’s unfunded actuarial accrued liability is currently estimated as $308 million based on that plan’s latest disclosure as of December 31, 2014. It is likely the A&P stores we did not purchase have withdrawn from the four plans in which we participate because no entity purchased them or the stores were sold to a buyer who is not obligated to contribute to the plans; therefore, our contingent liability for the underfunding of these plans likely increased further because liability for the plans’ underfunding shifted to the remaining employers in each of the plans.

See Note 14—Employee Benefit Plans and Collective Bargaining Agreements in our consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus, for more information relating to our participation in these multiemployer pension plans.

Unfavorable changes in government regulation may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our stores are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations and administrative practices. We must comply with numerous provisions regulating health and sanitation standards, food labeling, energy, environmental, equal employment opportunity, minimum wages and licensing for the sale of food, drugs and alcoholic beverages. We cannot predict either the nature of future laws, regulations, interpretations or applications, or the effect either additional government laws, regulations or administrative procedures, when and if promulgated, or disparate federal, state, local and foreign regulatory schemes would have on our future business. In addition, regulatory changes could require the reformulation of certain products to meet new standards, the recall or discontinuance of certain products not able to be reformulated, additional record keeping, expanded documentation of the properties of certain products, expanded or different labeling and/or scientific substantiation. Any or all of such requirements could have an adverse effect on our business.

29

Table of Contents

The minimum wage continues to increase and is subject to factors outside of our control.

A considerable number of our employees are paid at rates related to the federal minimum wage. Additionally, many of our stores are located in states, including California, where the minimum wage is greater than the federal minimum wage and where a considerable number of employees receive compensation equal to the state’s minimum wage. For example, as of December 5, 2015, we employed approximately 70,000 associates in California, where the current minimum wage was recently increased to $10.00 per hour effective January 1, 2016. In Maryland, where we employed approximately 7,800 associates as of December 5, 2015, the minimum wage was recently increased to $8.25 per hour, and will gradually increase to $10.10 per hour by July 1, 2018. Moreover, municipalities may set minimum wages above the applicable state standards. For example, the minimum wage in Seattle, Washington, where we employed approximately 2,000 associates as of December 5, 2015, was recently increased to $11.00 per hour, and will increase to $15.00 per hour effective January 1, 2017 for employers with more than 500 employees nationwide. In Chicago, Illinois, where we employed approximately 5,900 associates as of December 5, 2015, the minimum wage was recently increased to $10.00 per hour, and will gradually increase to $13.00 per hour by July 1, 2019. Any further increases in the federal minimum wage or the enactment of additional state or local minimum wage increases could increase our labor costs, which may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

The food retail industry is labor intensive. Our ability to meet our labor needs, while controlling wage and labor-related costs, is subject to numerous external factors, including the availability of qualified persons in the workforce in the local markets in which we are located, unemployment levels within those markets, prevailing wage rates, changing demographics and health and other insurance costs. In the event of increasing wage rates, if we fail to increase our wages competitively, the quality of our workforce could decline, causing our customer service to suffer, while increasing wages for our employees could cause our profit margins to decrease. If we are unable to hire and retain employees capable of meeting our business needs and expectations, our business and brand image may be impaired. Any failure to meet our staffing needs or any material increase in turnover rates of our employees may adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our historical financial statements may not be indicative of future performance.

In light of our acquisitions of NAI in March 2013, United in December 2013, and Safeway in January 2015, our operating results only reflect the impact of those acquisitions from those respective dates, and therefore comparisons with prior periods are difficult. As a result, our limited historical financial performance as owners of NAI, United and Safeway may make it difficult for stockholders to evaluate our business and results of operations to date and to assess our future prospects and viability. Furthermore, given the nature of the assets acquired, our recent operating history has resulted in revenue and profitability growth rates that may not be indicative of our future results of operations.

In addition, Safeway completed the distribution of its remaining shares of Blackhawk Network Holdings, Inc. (“Blackhawk”) in April 2014, the sale of the net assets of Canada Safeway Limited in November 2013 and closed or sold its Dominick’s stores in the fourth quarter of 2013. In addition, PDC was sold in December 2014, and Safeway’s 49% interest (the “Casa Ley Interest”) in Casa Ley, S.A. de C.V. (“Casa Ley”), a Mexico-based food and general merchandise retailer, is expected to be divested, with the net proceeds being paid to Safeway’s former stockholders.

As a result of the foregoing transactions and the implementation of new business initiatives and strategies, our historical results of operations are not necessarily indicative of our ongoing operations and the operating results to be expected in the future.

30

Table of Contents

Our unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated pro forma financial information may not be representative of our future results.

The pro forma financial information included in this prospectus is constructed from our consolidated financial statements and the historical consolidated financial statements of Safeway prior to the Safeway acquisition and does not purport to be indicative of the financial information that will result from our future operations. In addition, the pro forma financial information presented in this prospectus is based in part on certain assumptions that we believe are reasonable. We cannot assure you that our assumptions will prove to be accurate over time. Accordingly, the pro forma financial information included in this prospectus does not purport to be indicative of what our results of operations and financial condition would have been had AB Acquisition and Safeway been a combined entity during the period presented, or what our results of operations and financial condition will be in the future. The challenges associated with integrating previously independent businesses makes evaluating our business and our future financial prospects difficult. Our potential for future business success and operating profitability must be considered in light of the risks, uncertainties, expenses and difficulties typically encountered by other companies following business combinations.

Unfavorable changes in, failure to comply with or increased costs to comply with environmental laws and regulations could adversely affect us. The storage and sale of petroleum products could cause disruptions and expose us to potentially significant liabilities.

Our operations, including our 379 fuel centers, are subject to various laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the storage, management, disposal and cleanup of hazardous materials. Some environmental laws, such as the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and similar state statutes, impose strict, and under certain circumstances joint and several, liability for costs to remediate a contaminated site, and also impose liability for damages to natural resources.

Federal regulations under the Clean Air Act require phase out of the production of ozone-depleting refrigerants that include hydrochlorofluorocarbons, the most common of which is R-22. By 2020, production of new R-22 refrigerant gas will be completely phased out; however, recovered and recycled/reclaimed R-22 will be available for servicing systems after 2020. The company is reducing its R-22 footprint while continuing to repair leaks, thus extending the useful lifespan of existing equipment. For fiscal 2015, $3.3 million has been budgeted for system retrofits, and we budgeted approximately $3 million in subsequent years. Leak repairs are part of the ongoing refrigeration maintenance budget. We may be required to spend additional capital above and beyond what is currently budgeted for system retrofits and leak repairs which could have a significant impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Third-party claims in connection with releases of or exposure to hazardous materials relating to our current or former properties or third-party waste disposal sites can also arise. In addition, the presence of contamination at any of our properties could impair our ability to sell or lease the contaminated properties or to borrow money using any of these properties as collateral. The costs and liabilities associated with any such contamination could be substantial, and could have a material adverse effect on our business. Under current environmental laws, we may be held responsible for the remediation of environmental conditions regardless of whether we lease, sublease or own the stores or other facilities and regardless of whether such environmental conditions were created by us or a prior owner or tenant. In addition, the increased focus on climate change, waste management and other environmental issues may result in new environmental laws or regulations that negatively affect us directly or indirectly through increased costs on our suppliers. There can be no assurance that environmental contamination relating to prior, existing or future sites or other environmental changes will not adversely affect us through, for example, business interruption, cost of remediation or adverse publicity.

31

Table of Contents

We are subject to, and may in the future be subject to, legal or other proceedings that could have a material adverse effect on us.

From time to time, we are a party to legal proceedings, including matters involving personnel and employment issues, personal injury, antitrust claims, intellectual property claims and other proceedings arising in or outside of the ordinary course of business. In addition, there are an increasing number of cases being filed against companies generally, which contain class-action allegations under federal and state wage and hour laws. We estimate our exposure to these legal proceedings and establish reserves for the estimated liabilities. Assessing and predicting the outcome of these matters involves substantial uncertainties. Although not currently anticipated by management, unexpected outcomes in these legal proceedings or changes in management’s forecast assumptions or predictions, could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations.

We may be adversely affected by risks related to our dependence on IT systems. Any future intrusion into these IT systems, even if we are compliant with industry security standards, could materially adversely affect our reputation, financial condition and operating results.

We have complex IT systems that are important to the success of our business operations and marketing initiatives. If we were to experience failures, breakdowns, substandard performance or other adverse events affecting these systems, or difficulties accessing the proprietary business data stored in these systems, or in maintaining, expanding or upgrading existing systems or implementing new systems, we could incur significant losses due to disruptions in our systems and business.

Our ability to effectively manage the day-to-day business of approximately 900 Albertsons and NAI stores depends significantly on IT services and systems provided by SuperValu pursuant to two transition services agreements (the “SVU TSAs”). It is intended that SuperValu will also provide IT services and systems for the stores Acme Markets acquires pursuant to the A&P Transaction. Prior to Albertsons’ and NAI’s transition onto Safeway’s IT systems, the failure of SuperValu’s systems to operate effectively or to integrate with other systems, or unauthorized access into SuperValu’s systems, could cause us to incur significant losses due to disruptions in our systems and business.

We receive and store personal information in connection with our marketing and human resources organizations. The protection of our customer and employee data is critically important to us. Despite our considerable efforts to secure our respective computer networks, security could be compromised, confidential information could be misappropriated or system disruptions could occur, as has occurred with a number of other retailers. If we (or through SuperValu) experience a data security breach, we could be exposed to government enforcement actions, possible assessments from the card brands if credit card data was involved and potential litigation. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in our ability to protect their personal information, which could cause them to stop shopping at our stores altogether. The loss of confidence from a data security breach involving our employees could hurt our reputation and cause employee recruiting and retention challenges.

Improper activities by third parties, exploitation of encryption technology, new data-hacking tools and discoveries and other events or developments may result in future intrusions into or compromise of our networks, payment card terminals or other payment systems. In particular, the techniques used by criminals to obtain unauthorized access to sensitive data change frequently and often cannot be recognized until launched against a target; accordingly, we may not be able to anticipate these frequently changing techniques or implement adequate preventive measures for all of them. Any unauthorized access into our customers’ sensitive information, or data belonging to us or our suppliers, even if we are compliant with industry security standards, could put us at a competitive disadvantage, result in deterioration of our customers’ confidence in us, and subject us to potential litigation, liability, fines and penalties and consent decrees, resulting in a possible material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

32

Table of Contents

As merchants who accept debit and credit cards for payment, we are subject to the Payment Card Industry (“PCI”) Data Security Standard (“PCI DSS”) issued by the PCI Council. PCI DSS contains compliance guidelines and standards with regard to our security surrounding the physical administrative and technical storage, processing and transmission of individual cardholder data. By accepting debit cards for payment, we are also subject to compliance with American National Standards Institute (“ANSI”) data encryption standards and payment network security operating guidelines. In addition, we are required to comply with PCI DSS version 3.0 for our 2015 assessment, and are replacing or enhancing our in-store systems to comply with these standards. Failure to be PCI compliant or to meet other payment card standards may result in the imposition of financial penalties or the allocation by the card brands of the costs of fraudulent charges to us. Despite our efforts to comply with these or other payment card standards and other information security measures, we cannot be certain that all of our (or through SuperValu) IT systems will be able to prevent, contain or detect all cyber-attacks or intrusions from known malware or malware that may be developed in the future. To the extent that any disruption results in the loss, damage or misappropriation of information, we may be adversely affected by claims from customers, financial institutions, regulatory authorities, payment card associations and others. In addition, the cost of complying with stricter privacy and information security laws and standards, including PCI DSS version 3.0 and ANSI data encryption standards, could be significant.

Termination of the SuperValu transition services agreement or the failure of SuperValu to perform its obligations thereunder could adversely affect our business, financial results and financial condition.

Our ability to effectively monitor and control the operations of Albertsons and NAI depends to a large extent on the proper functioning of our IT and business support systems. In connection with our acquisition of NAI, Albertsons and NAI each entered into a comprehensive transition services agreement with SuperValu. Pursuant to the SVU TSAs, Albertsons and NAI each pay fees to SuperValu for certain services, including back office, administrative, IT, procurement, insurance and accounting services. The SVU TSAs limit the liability of SuperValu to instances in which SuperValu has committed gross negligence in regard to the provision of services or has breached its obligations under the SVU TSAs. The SVU TSAs terminated and replaced a transition services agreement providing for substantially similar services, which we had previously entered into with SuperValu in connection with our June 2006 acquisition of the Legacy Albertsons Stores. We plan to complete the transition of our Albertsons and NAI stores, distribution centers and systems onto Safeway’s IT systems by mid-2018, but may suffer disruptions as part of that process. In addition, we are dependent upon SuperValu to continue to provide these services to Albertsons and NAI until we transition Albertsons and NAI onto Safeway’s IT system and otherwise replace SuperValu as a service provider to Albertsons and NAI. In addition, we may depend on SuperValu to manage IT services and systems for additional stores we acquire, including the A&P stores we have acquired, until we are able to transition such stores onto Safeway’s IT system. The failure by SuperValu to perform its obligations under the SVU TSAs prior to Albertsons’ and NAI’s transition onto Safeway’s IT systems and to other service providers (external or internal) could adversely affect our business, financial results, prospects and results of operations.

Furthermore, SuperValu manages and operates NAI’s distribution center located in the Lancaster, Pennsylvania area. Under the Lancaster Agreement (as defined herein), SuperValu supplies NAI’s Acme and Shaw’s stores from the distribution center under a shared costs arrangement. The failure by SuperValu to perform its obligations under the Lancaster Agreement could adversely affect our business, financial results and financial condition.

33

Table of Contents

Our third-party IT services provider discovered unauthorized computer intrusions in 2014. These intrusions could adversely affect our brands and could discourage customers from shopping in our Albertsons and NAI stores.

Our third-party IT services provider for Albertsons and NAI, SuperValu, informed us in the summer of 2014 that it discovered unlawful intrusions to approximately 800 Shaw’s , Star Market , Acme , Jewel - Osco and Albertsons banner stores in an attempt to obtain payment card data. We have contacted the appropriate law enforcement authorities regarding these incidents and have coordinated with our merchant bank and payment processors to address the situation. We maintain insurance to address potential liabilities for cyber risks and, in the case of Albertsons and NAI, are self-insured for cyber risks for periods prior to August 11, 2014. We have also notified our various insurance carriers of these incidents and are providing further updates to the carriers as the investigation continues.

We believe the intrusions may have been an attempt to collect payment card data. The unlawful intrusions have given rise to putative class action litigation complaints against SuperValu and our company on behalf of customers. The class action complaints were dismissed without prejudice on January 7, 2016. On October 6, 2015, we received a letter from the Office of Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania stating that the Illinois and Pennsylvania Attorneys General Offices are leading a multistate group that includes the Attorneys General for 14 other states requesting specified information concerning the two data breach incidents. We are in the process of providing the requested information. In addition, the payment card networks required that forensic investigations be conducted of the intrusions. The forensic firm retained by us to conduct an investigation has issued separate reports for each intrusion (copies of which have been provided to the payment card networks). In both reports, the forensic firm found that not all of the PCI DSS standards had been met and that some of this non-compliance may have contributed to or caused at least some portion of the compromise that occurred during the intrusions. We believe it is probable that the payment card networks will make claims against us. These claims will likely include amounts for incremental counterfeit fraud losses and non-ordinary course operating expenses (such as card reissuance costs) that the payment card networks assert they or their issuing banks have incurred. If the payment card networks assert claims against us, we currently intend to dispute those claims and assert available defenses. At the present time, we believe that it is probable that we will incur a loss in connection with the potential claims from the payment card networks. We have recorded an estimated liability for probable losses that we expect to incur in connection with the potential claims to be made by the payment card networks. The estimated liability is based on information currently available to us and may change as new information becomes available or when the payment card networks assert their claims against us. We will continue to evaluate information as it becomes known and will record an estimate of loss when it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably estimable. Currently, the potential range of any loss above our currently recorded amount cannot be reasonably estimated given no claims have yet been asserted and because significant factual and legal issues remain unresolved. On October 20, 2015, we agreed with one of our third-party payment card administrators to post a $15 million letter of credit to cover potential fines and penalties from certain card brands and to maintain a minimum level of card processing until the potential claims from the card brands are resolved.

There can be no assurance that we will not suffer a similar criminal attack in the future or that unauthorized parties will not gain access to personal information of our customers. While we have recently implemented additional security software and hardware designed to provide additional protections against unauthorized intrusions, there can be no assurance that unauthorized individuals will not discover a means to circumvent our security. Computer intrusions could adversely affect our brands, have caused us to incur legal and other fees, may cause us to incur additional expenses for additional security measures and could discourage customers from shopping in our stores.

34

Table of Contents

We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance to address potential liabilities for workers’ compensation, automobile and general liability, property risk (including earthquake and flood coverage), director and officers’ liability, employment practices liability, pharmacy liability and employee health care benefits.

We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance to address potential liabilities for workers’ compensation, automobile and general liability, property risk (including earthquake and flood coverage), director and officers’ liability, employment practices liability, pharmacy liability and employee health care benefits and cyber and terrorism risks. We estimate the liabilities associated with the risks retained by us, in part, by considering historical claims experience, demographic and severity factors and other actuarial assumptions which, by their nature, are subject to a high degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are unpredictable external factors affecting future inflation rates, discount rates, litigation trends, legal interpretations, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns.

The majority of our workers’ compensation liability is from claims occurring in California. California workers’ compensation has received intense scrutiny from the state’s politicians, insurers, employers and providers, as well as the public in general.

Our long-lived assets, primarily stores, are subject to periodic testing for impairment.

Our long-lived assets, primarily stores, are subject to periodic testing for impairment. Safeway incurred significant impairment charges to earnings in the past, including in Safeway’s fiscal years ended January 3, 2015, December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012. Failure to achieve sufficient levels of cash flow at reporting units could result in impairment charges on long-lived assets.

Our operations are dependent upon the availability of a significant amount of energy and fuel to manufacture, store, transport and sell products.

Our operations are dependent upon the availability of a significant amount of energy and fuel to manufacture, store, transport and sell products. Energy and fuel costs are influenced by international, political and economic circumstances and have experienced volatility over time. To reduce the impact of volatile energy costs, we have entered into contracts to purchase electricity and natural gas at fixed prices to satisfy a portion of our energy needs. We also manage our exposure to changes in energy prices utilized in the shipping process through the use of short-term diesel fuel derivative contracts. Volatility in fuel and energy costs that exceeds offsetting contractual arrangements could adversely affect our results of operations.

Haggen has asserted claims against us, which, if adversely determined, would subject us to significant liabilities.

On September 1, 2015, following FTC-mandated divestitures of certain of our stores to Haggen, Haggen commenced a lawsuit against Albertson’s LLC and Albertson’s Holdings LLC in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging claims for violation of Section 7 of the Clayton Act, attempted monopolization under the Sherman Act, breach of contract, indemnification, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud, unfair competition, misappropriation of trade secrets under the Uniform Trade Secrets Acts, conversion and violation of the Washington Consumer Protection Act (the “District Court Action”). In the complaint, Haggen alleged that we, among other actions set out in the complaint, misused Haggen’s confidential information to draw customers away from Haggen stores, provided inaccurate, incomplete and misleading inventory data and pricing information on products transferred to Haggen, deliberately understocked and overstocked inventory in stores acquired by Haggen and wrongfully cut off advertising prior to the transfer of stores to Haggen. Furthermore, Haggen alleged that, if it is destroyed as a competitor, its damages may exceed $1 billion, and asserted it is entitled to treble and punitive damages and to seek rescission of the asset purchase agreement. In addition, on September 17, 2015, we received a letter from the legal counsel

35

Table of Contents

of another purchaser of a small number of our FTC-mandated divested stores, alleging claims similar to those presented in Haggen’s lawsuit. We believe that the claims asserted by Haggen and the additional purchaser are without merit and intend to vigorously defend against the claims.

On January 21, 2016, we entered into a settlement agreement with (i) Haggen and its debtor and non-debtor affiliates, (ii) the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed in Haggen’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy case (the “Creditors’ Committee”) and (iii) Comvest Partners and its affiliates pursuant to which we resolved the disputes in the State Court Action (as defined herein) and the District Court Action (together, the “Pending Litigations”). The settlement agreement, which is subject to approval of the Bankruptcy Court administering Haggen’s bankruptcy case, provides for the dismissal with prejudice of the Pending Litigations in exchange for (a) a cash payment by us of $5.75 million to a trust to be formed by the Creditors’ Committee, (the “Creditor Trust”) (b) an agreement that we will have an allowed unsecured claim against Haggen in its bankruptcy case of $8.25 million, which we will transfer to the Creditor Trust, and (c) an exchange of releases of any and all claims among the settling parties. The settlement agreement may be terminated if it is not approved by the Bankruptcy Court on or before February 26, 2016, if the Bankruptcy Court’s order does not become final on or before February 26, 2017 or if the Pending Litigations are not dismissed within seven business days of the Bankruptcy Court’s order becoming final. The $5.75 million cash payment is incremental to the previously recorded losses of $41.1 million related to the purchased inventory in the second quarter of fiscal 2015 and $29.8 million related to our contingent lease liability for leases Haggen rejected in the third quarter of fiscal 2015. Should the settlement agreement be terminated, an unfavorable resolution of the litigation could subject us to significant liabilities.

We may have liability under certain operating leases that were assigned to third parties.

We may have liability under certain operating leases that were assigned to third parties. If any of these third parties fail to perform their obligations under the leases, we could be responsible for the lease obligation. In connection with FTC-mandated divestitures, we assigned leases with respect to 93 store properties to Haggen. On September 8, 2015, Haggen commenced a case under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, and on October 19, 2015, Haggen secured Bankruptcy Court approval of bidding procedures for the sale of 130 stores that we sold to it (including 72 leased stores and 12 ground-leased stores). Haggen held an auction for those stores in November 2015. After participating in the auction, having additional negotiations with Haggen and receiving FTC and state attorneys general clearance, we acquired, with Bankruptcy Court approval, 19 assigned store leases for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $10.7 million. During the auction, there were also 38 store leases that we previously assigned to Haggen acquired by and assigned to other retailers and six assigned store leases acquired by the landlord. Two store leases were re-negotiated by Haggen prior to its bankruptcy, thus eliminating our contingent liability. Haggen has rejected, in its bankruptcy case, nine store leases for which we have potential lease liability. During the third quarter of fiscal 2015, we recorded a loss of $29.8 million to reflect this liability.

Haggen has secured Bankruptcy Court approval of bidding procedures for the sale of its 33 “core stores,” which include six store leases and two ground leases for which we have contingent liability. The “core stores” bidding procedures order contemplates an auction on February 5, 2016 and a hearing to approve any “core store” sales on February 17, 2016. Haggen also has one remaining store lease and 10 remaining ground leases for which we have potential lease liability that are not included in the “core store” auction.

Should Haggen reject any of the six “core store” leases or the remaining one store lease for which we have contingent lease liability, we could also be responsible for Haggen’s obligations under those leases. The aggregate undiscounted lease obligations under these seven store leases is approximately $10.2 million. We could also be responsible for Haggen’s obligations under the

36

Table of Contents

remaining 12 ground leases we assigned to it, but these leases are owned by a Haggen entity that is not a debtor in the bankruptcy case. We do not know the full extent to which Haggen will reject or default on its remaining lease obligations to third parties or whether Haggen will be successful in selling these remaining store leases to third parties. We also do not know what defenses may be available to us, including any loss mitigation obligations of Haggen’s landlords under the terms of the leases or applicable law. As a result, we are currently unable to estimate our losses with respect to any potential contingent liability with respect to these remaining leases.

With respect to other leases we have assigned to third parties (other than Haggen but including the 38 leases Haggen had acquired from us but assigned to other retailers in its bankruptcy), because of the wide dispersion among third parties and the variety of remedies available, we believe that if an assignee became insolvent it would not have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. No liability has been recorded for assigned leases in our consolidated balance sheet related to these contingent obligations.

We may be unable to attract and retain key personnel, which could adversely impact our ability to successfully execute our business strategy.

The continued successful implementation of our business strategy depends in large part upon the ability and experience of members of our senior management. In addition, our performance is dependent on our ability to identify, hire, train, motivate and retain qualified management, technical, sales and marketing and retail personnel. We cannot assure you that we will be able to retain such personnel on acceptable terms or at all. If we lose the services of members of our senior management or are unable to continue to attract and retain the necessary personnel, we may not be able to successfully execute our business strategy, which could have an adverse effect on our business.

Risks Related to the Safeway and A&P Acquisitions and Integration

We may not be able to successfully integrate and combine Safeway with Albertsons and NAI, which could cause our business to suffer.

We may not be able to successfully integrate and combine the operations, management, personnel and technology of Safeway with the operations of Albertsons and NAI. If the integration is not managed successfully by our management, we may experience interruptions in our business activities, a deterioration in our employee and customer relationships, increased costs of integration and harm to our reputation with consumers, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. We may also experience difficulties in combining corporate cultures, maintaining employee morale and retaining key employees. In addition, the integration of our businesses will impose substantial demands on our management. There is no assurance that the benefits of consolidation will be achieved as a result of the Safeway acquisition or that our businesses will be successfully integrated in a timely manner.

We may not be able to achieve the full amount of synergies that are anticipated, or achieve the synergies on the schedule anticipated, from the Safeway acquisition.

Although we currently expect to achieve annual synergies from the Safeway acquisition of approximately $800 million by the end of fiscal 2018, with associated one-time costs of approximately $1.1 billion, or $690 million, net of estimated synergy-related asset sale proceeds, inclusion of the projected cost synergies in this prospectus should not be viewed as a representation that we in fact will achieve this annual synergy target by the end of fiscal 2018, or at all. Although we currently expect to achieve synergies from the Safeway acquisition of approximately $200 million during fiscal 2015, or $440 million on an annual run-rate basis, by the end of fiscal 2015, the inclusion of these expected cost synergy targets in this prospectus should not be viewed as a representation that we will in fact achieve

37

Table of Contents

these synergies by the end of fiscal 2015, or at all. To the extent we fail to achieve these synergies, our results of operations may be impacted, and any such impact may be material.

We have identified various synergies including corporate and division overhead savings, our own brands, vendor funds, the conversion of Albertsons and NAI onto Safeway’s IT systems, marketing and advertising cost reduction and operational efficiencies within our back office, distribution and manufacturing organizations. Actual synergies, the expenses and cash required to realize the synergies and the sources of the synergies could differ materially from these estimates, and we cannot assure you that we will achieve the full amount of synergies on the schedule anticipated, or at all, or that these synergy programs will not have other adverse effects on our business. In light of these significant uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on our estimated synergies.

We have incurred, and will continue to incur, significant integration costs in connection with Safeway.

We expect that we will continue to incur a number of costs associated with integrating the operations of Safeway, including associated one-time costs of approximately $1.1 billion, or $690 million, net of estimated synergy-related asset sale proceeds, to achieve expected synergies. The substantial majority of these costs will be non-recurring expenses resulting from the Safeway acquisition and will consist of our transition of Albertsons and NAI to Safeway’s IT systems, consolidation costs and employment-related costs. Anticipated synergies are expected to require approximately $175 million of one-time integration-related capital expenditures in fiscal 2015, in advance of anticipated sales of surplus assets. Additional unanticipated costs may be incurred in the integration of Safeway’s business and proceeds from the sale of surplus assets may be lower than anticipated. Although we expect that the elimination of duplicative costs, as well as the realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of the businesses, may offset incremental transaction and merger-related costs over time, this net benefit may not be achieved in the near term, or at all.

New business initiatives and strategies may be less successful than anticipated and could adversely affect our business.

The introduction, implementation, success and timing of new business initiatives and strategies, including, but not limited to, initiatives to increase revenue or reduce costs, may be less successful or may be different than anticipated, which could adversely affect our business.

We will be required to make payments under the contingent value rights within agreed periods even if the sale of the Casa Ley Interest is not completed within those periods.

If the Casa Ley Interest is not sold prior to January 30, 2018, we are obligated to make a cash payment to the holders of contingent value rights (the “Casa Ley CVRs”) in an amount equal to the fair market value of the unsold Casa Ley Interest, minus certain fees, expenses and assumed taxes that would have been deducted from the proceeds of a sale of the Casa Ley Interest. The sale process for the Casa Ley Interest will be conducted by a committee, or person controlled by a committee, as representative of the former Safeway stockholders, and we cannot control such sales process. If we are required to make a payment under the contingent value rights agreement with respect to the Casa Ley CVRs, our liquidity may be adversely affected.

We have not provided any detailed financial information with respect to A&P or any pro forma information reflecting the A&P Transaction in this prospectus.

Pursuant to applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules, this prospectus does not include or incorporate by reference any detailed financial information with respect to the assets

38

Table of Contents

acquired pursuant to the A&P Transaction for periods prior to the A&P Transaction. In addition, in accordance with applicable SEC rules, we are not required to provide and have not provided any pro forma information giving effect to the A&P Transaction. A&P’s financial condition and results of operations for periods prior to its entry into bankruptcy are of limited utility in assessing the potential impact of the A&P Transaction on our financial condition because we are only purchasing certain assets and assuming certain liabilities of A&P.

We will incur significant acquisition-related costs in connection with the A&P Transaction.

We expect to incur a number of costs associated with integrating the operations of the acquired A&P stores. We expect to spend approximately $134 million of one-time opening and transition costs and capital expenditures to remodel and remerchandise the 71 stores we have acquired. The amount of expenditures required to improve store conditions and reposition the stores is greater on a per store basis than our previous acquisitions. Although we expect that the elimination of duplicative costs, as well as the realization of other efficiencies related to the integration of the acquired A&P stores may offset these costs over time, this net benefit may not be achieved in the near term, or at all.

We may not be able to achieve the full amount of synergies that are anticipated or achieve the synergies on the schedule anticipated from the A&P Transaction.

Although we currently expect to achieve annual synergies from the A&P Transaction of approximately $48 million by the end of fiscal 2019, inclusion of the projected cost synergies in this prospectus should not be viewed as a representation that we in fact will achieve this annual synergy target by the end of fiscal 2019, or at all. To the extent we fail to achieve these synergies, our results of operations may be impacted, and any such impact may be material.

We have identified various synergies including sourcing, distribution and IT. Actual synergies, the expenses and cash required to realize the synergies and the sources of the synergies could differ materially from our estimates, and we cannot assure you that we will achieve the full amount of synergies on the schedule anticipated, or at all. In light of these significant uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on our estimated synergies from the A&P Transaction.

Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness

Our substantial level of indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our indebtedness.

We have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of December 5, 2015 and after giving pro forma effect to this offering, the Pre-IPO Refinancing and the application of the use of the net proceeds of this offering, we would have had $10.5 billion of debt outstanding, and we would have been able to borrow an additional $2.7 billion under our revolving credit facilities.

Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to you. For example, it could:

39

Table of Contents

In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our debt or that we will be able to refinance our debt on commercially reasonable terms. If we were unable to make payments or refinance our debt or obtain new financing under these circumstances, we would have to consider other options, such as:

Our debt instruments may restrict, or market or business conditions may limit, our ability to use some of our options.

Despite our significant indebtedness levels, we may still be able to incur substantially more debt, which could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage.

We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The terms of the credit agreements that govern the New ABL Facility and the ABS/Safeway Term Loan Facilities (collectively, the “Senior Secured Credit Facilities”) and the indentures that govern the NAI Notes (as defined herein), the Safeway Notes (as defined herein) and the ABS/Safeway Notes permit us to incur significant additional indebtedness, subject to certain limitations. If new indebtedness is added to our and our subsidiaries’ current debt levels, the related risks that we and they now face would intensify. See “Description of Indebtedness.”

Our debt instruments limit our flexibility in operating our business.

Our debt instruments contain various covenants that limit our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to engage in specified types of transactions, including, among other things:

A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under our debt instruments. In addition, any debt agreements we enter into in the future may further limit our ability to enter into certain types of transactions. In addition, the restrictive covenants in the revolving portion of our Senior Secured Credit Facilities require us, in certain circumstances, to maintain a specific fixed charge coverage ratio. Our ability to meet that financial ratio can be affected by events beyond our control, and

40

Table of Contents

we cannot assure you that we will meet it. A breach of this covenant could result in a default under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. Moreover, the occurrence of a default under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities could result in an event of default under our other indebtedness. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities to be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to extend further credit. Even if we are able to obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially reasonable terms, or terms that are acceptable to us. See “Description of Indebtedness.”

We may not have the ability to raise the funds necessary to finance the change of control offer required by the indentures governing the 2016 Safeway Notes, the 2017 Safeway Notes, the 2019 Safeway Notes, the 2020 Safeway Notes (each as defined herein) and the ABS/Safeway Notes (collectively, the “CoC Notes”).

Upon the occurrence of certain kinds of change of control events, we will be required to offer to repurchase outstanding CoC Notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of repurchase. However, it is possible that we will not have sufficient funds at the time of the change of control to make the required repurchase of the CoC Notes or that restrictions in our debt instruments will not allow such repurchases. Our failure to purchase the tendered notes would constitute an event of default under the indentures governing the CoC Notes which, in turn, would constitute a default under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. In addition, the occurrence of a change of control would also constitute a default under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. A default under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities would result in a default under our indentures if the lenders accelerate the debt under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities.

Moreover, our debt instruments restrict, and any future indebtedness we incur may restrict, our ability to repurchase the notes, including following a change of control event. As a result, following a change of control event, we may not be able to repurchase the CoC Notes unless we first repay all indebtedness outstanding under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities and any of our other indebtedness that contains similar provisions, or obtain a waiver from the holders of such indebtedness to permit us to repurchase the CoC Notes. We may be unable to repay all of that indebtedness or obtain a waiver of that type. Any requirement to offer to repurchase the outstanding CoC Notes may therefore require us to refinance our other outstanding debt, which we may not be able to do on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. These repurchase requirements may also delay or make it more difficult for others to obtain control of us.

Substantially all of our assets are pledged as collateral under the Senior Secured Credit Facilities, the NAI Notes, the Safeway Notes and the ABS/Safeway Notes.

As of December 5, 2015, our total indebtedness was approximately $11.9 billion, and after giving effect to the Pre-IPO Refinancing, this offering and the application of the use of the net proceeds of this offering, our total indebtedness as of December 5, 2015 would have been approximately $10.5 billion on a pro forma basis, including $6.2 billion outstanding under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities, $1.8 billion outstanding under the NAI Notes, $1.5 billion outstanding under the Safeway Notes, and $365.8 million aggregate principal amount outstanding under the ABS/Safeway Notes. In addition, as of December 5, 2015, we had $616.4 million of outstanding standby letters of credit under our Senior Secured Credit Facilities. Substantially all of our and our subsidiaries’ assets are pledged as collateral for this indebtedness. As of December 5, 2015, and after giving pro forma effect to the Pre-IPO Refinancing, this offering and the application of the use of the net proceeds of this offering, our revolving credit facilities would have permitted additional borrowings of up to a maximum of $2.7 billion under the borrowing bases as of that date. If we are unable to repay all secured borrowings when due, whether at maturity or if declared due and payable following a default, the trustee or the lenders, as applicable,

41

Table of Contents

would have the right to proceed against the collateral pledged to secure the indebtedness and may sell the assets pledged as collateral in order to repay those borrowings, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Increases in interest rates and/or a downgrade of our credit ratings could negatively affect our financing costs and our ability to access capital.

We have exposure to future interest rates based on the variable rate debt under our credit facilities and to the extent we raise additional debt in the capital markets to meet maturing debt obligations, to fund our capital expenditures and working capital needs and to finance future acquisitions. Daily working capital requirements are typically financed with operational cash flow and through the use of various committed lines of credit. The interest rate on these borrowing arrangements is generally determined from the inter-bank offering rate at the borrowing date plus a pre-set margin. Although we employ risk management techniques to hedge against interest rate volatility, significant and sustained increases in market interest rates could materially increase our financing costs and negatively impact our reported results.

We rely on access to bank and capital markets as sources of liquidity for cash requirements not satisfied by cash flows from operations. A downgrade in our credit ratings from the internationally recognized credit rating agencies could negatively affect our ability to access the bank and capital markets, especially in a time of uncertainty in either of those markets. A rating downgrade could also impact our ability to grow our business by substantially increasing the cost of, or limiting access to, capital.

Risks Related to This Offering and Owning Our Common Stock

There is no existing market for our common stock, and we do not know if one will develop to provide you with adequate liquidity. If the stock price fluctuates after this offering, you could lose a significant part of your investment.

Prior to this offering, there has not been a public market for our common stock. We cannot predict the extent to which investor interest in our company will lead to the development of an active trading market on the NYSE or otherwise or how liquid that market might become. If an active trading market does not develop, you may have difficulty selling shares of our common stock that you buy. The initial public offering price for the shares will be determined by negotiations between us and the underwriters and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the open market following this offering. The market price of our common stock may be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our control, including:

42

Table of Contents

As a result of these factors, you may not be able to resell your shares of our common stock at or above the initial offering price. In addition, the stock market often experiences extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of a particular company. These broad market fluctuations and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance.

The Cerberus-led Consortium controls us and may have conflicts of interest with other stockholders in the future.

After the completion of this offering, and assuming an offering of 65,306,122 shares by us, the Cerberus-led Consortium will indirectly control approximately 80.3% of our common stock. As a result, the Cerberus-led Consortium will continue to be able to control the election of our directors, determine our corporate and management policies and determine, without the consent of our other stockholders, the outcome of any corporate transaction or other matter submitted to our stockholders for approval, including potential mergers or acquisitions, asset sales and other significant corporate transactions. Eight of our 12 directors are either employees of, or advisors to, members of the Cerberus-led Consortium, as described under “Management.” The Cerberus-led Consortium, through Albertsons Investor and Kimco, will also have sufficient voting power to amend our organizational documents. The interests of the Cerberus-led Consortium may not coincide with the interests of other holders of our common stock. Additionally, Cerberus and the members of the Cerberus-led Consortium are in the business of making investments in companies and may, from time to time, acquire and hold interests in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with us. Cerberus and the members of the Cerberus-led Consortium may also pursue, for its own members’ accounts, acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. So long as the Cerberus-led Consortium continues to own a significant amount of the outstanding shares of our common stock through Albertsons Investor and Kimco, the Cerberus-led Consortium will continue to be able to strongly influence or effectively control our decisions, including potential mergers or acquisitions, asset sales and other significant corporate transactions.

We will incur increased costs as a result of being a publicly traded company.

After the completion of this offering, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the rules and regulations of the stock market on which our common stock is traded. Being subject to these rules and regulations will result in additional legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, will make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly and may also place significant strain on management, systems and resources.

These laws and regulations also could make it more difficult or costly for us to obtain certain types of insurance, including director and officer liability insurance, and we may be forced to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. These laws and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors, our board committees or as our executive officers. Furthermore, if we are unable to satisfy our obligations as a public company, we could be subject to delisting of our common stock, fines, sanctions and other regulatory action and potentially civil litigation.

43

Table of Contents

We are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE rules and, as a result, will qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. You will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.

Upon completion of this offering, Albertsons Investor, Kimco and Management Holdco, as a group, will control a majority of our outstanding common stock. As a result, we are a “controlled company” within the meaning of the NYSE rules. Under the NYSE rules, a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including:

Following this offering, we intend to utilize these exemptions. As a result, we will not have a majority of independent directors nor will our nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees consist entirely of independent directors. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the NYSE corporate governance requirements.

We are currently not required to meet the standards required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (“Section 404”), and failure to meet and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As a privately held company, we are not currently required to document or test our compliance with internal controls over financial reporting on a periodic basis in accordance with Section 404. We are in the process of addressing our internal control procedures to satisfy the requirements of Section 404, which requires an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If we are not able to implement the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. If we are unable to maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to report our financial information on a timely basis, may suffer adverse regulatory consequences or violations of applicable stock exchange listing rules and may breach the covenants under our credit facilities. We will be unable to issue securities in the public markets through the use of a shelf registration statement if we are not in compliance with the applicable provisions of Section 404. There could also be a negative reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of investor confidence in us and the reliability of our financial statements.

In addition, we may incur additional costs in order to improve our internal control over financial reporting and comply with Section 404, including increased auditing and legal fees and costs associated with hiring additional accounting and administrative staff.

44

Table of Contents

Provisions in our charter documents, certain agreements governing our indebtedness, the Stockholders’ Agreement (as defined herein) and Delaware law could make an acquisition of us more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management, even if beneficial to our stockholders.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and, upon the completion of the IPO-Related Transactions, our bylaws, may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control that some stockholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for your shares of our common stock. These provisions could also limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock, possibly depressing the market price of our common stock.

In addition, these provisions may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to replace members of our board of directors. Because our board of directors is responsible for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions could in turn affect any attempt by our stockholders to replace members of our management team. Examples of such provisions are as follows:

45

Table of Contents

Our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue up to 30,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be determined by our board of directors at the time of issuance or fixed by resolution without further action by the stockholders. These terms may include voting rights, preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion rights, redemption rights, and sinking fund provisions. The issuance of preferred stock could diminish the rights of holders of our common stock, and therefore could reduce the value of our common stock. In addition, specific rights granted to holders of preferred stock could be used to restrict our ability to merge with, or sell assets to, a third party. The ability of our board of directors to issue preferred stock could delay, discourage, prevent, or make it more difficult or costly to acquire or effect a change in control, thereby preserving the current stockholders’ control.

In addition, under the credit agreements governing our Senior Secured Credit Facilities, a change in control may lead the lenders to exercise remedies such as acceleration of the loan, termination of their obligations to fund additional advances and collection against the collateral securing such loans. Also, under the indentures governing the CoC Notes, a change of control may require us to offer to repurchase all of the CoC Notes for cash at a premium to the principal amount of the CoC Notes.

Furthermore, in connection with this offering, Albertsons Companies, Inc. will enter into the Stockholders’ Agreement with Albertsons Investor, Kimco and Management Holdco. Pursuant to the Stockholders’ Agreement, we will be required to appoint to our Board of Directors individuals designated by Albertsons Investor upon the closing of the IPO-Related Transactions. Pursuant to a limited liability company agreement entered into by the Cerberus-led Consortium, other than Kimco, and certain other individuals who agreed to co-invest with them through Albertsons Investor (the “Albertsons Investor LLC Agreement”), such appointees shall be selected by Albertsons Investor’s board of managers so long as Albertsons Companies, Inc. is a controlled company under the applicable rules of the NYSE. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Albertsons Investor Limited Liability Company Agreement.”

The Stockholders’ Agreement will provide that, except as otherwise required by applicable law, from the date on which (a) Albertsons Companies, Inc. is no longer a controlled company under the applicable rules of the NYSE but prior to the 35% Trigger Date, Albertsons Investor will have the right to designate a number of individuals who satisfy the Director Requirements (as defined herein) equal to one director fewer than 50% of our board of directors at any time and shall cause its directors appointed to our board of directors to vote in favor of maintaining a 13-person board of directors unless the management board of Albertsons Investor otherwise agrees by the affirmative vote of 80% of the management board of Albertsons Investor; (b) a Holder (as defined herein) has beneficial ownership of at least 20% but less than 35% of our outstanding common stock, the Holder will have the right to designate a number of individuals who satisfy the Director Requirements equal to the greater of three or 25% of the size of our board of directors at any time (rounded up to the next whole number); (c) a Holder has beneficial ownership of at least 15% but less than 20% of our outstanding common stock, the Holder will have the right to designate the greater of two or 15% of the size of our board of directors at any time (rounded up

46

Table of Contents

to the next whole number); and (d) a Holder has beneficial ownership of at least 10% but less than 15% of our outstanding common stock, it will have the right to designate one individual who satisfies the Director Requirements. The ability of Albertsons Investor or a Holder to appoint one or more directors could make an acquisition of us more difficult and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management, even if beneficial to our stockholders.

Our certificate of incorporation designates the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees.

Our certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for: (a) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf; (b) any action asserting a claim for breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any of our directors, officers, employees or agents to us or our stockholders; (c) any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to any provision of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”), our certificate of incorporation or our bylaws; or (d) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock is deemed to have received notice of and consented to the foregoing provisions. This choice of forum provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds more favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find this choice of forum provision inapplicable to, or unenforceable in respect of, one or more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

If a substantial number of shares becomes available for sale and are sold in a short period of time, the market price of our common stock could decline.

If our Existing Owners sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market following this offering, the market price of our common stock could decrease. The perception in the public market that our Existing Owners might sell shares of common stock could also create a perceived overhang and depress our market price. Upon completion of this offering, we will have 475,139,081 shares of common stock outstanding of which 409,832,959 shares will be held by our current stockholders. Prior to this offering, we and our Existing Owners will have agreed with the underwriters to a “lock-up” period, meaning that such parties may not, subject to certain exceptions, sell any of their existing shares of our common stock without the prior written consent of representatives of the underwriters for at least 180 days after the date of this prospectus. Pursuant to this agreement, among other exceptions, we may enter into an agreement providing for the issuance of our common stock in connection with the acquisition, merger or joint venture with another publicly traded entity during the 180-day restricted period after the date of this prospectus. In addition, all of our Existing Owners will be subject to the holding period requirement of Rule 144 (“Rule 144”) under the Securities Act, as described in “Shares Eligible for Future Sale.” When the lock-up agreements expire, these shares will become eligible for sale, in some cases subject to the requirements of Rule 144.

In addition, the Cerberus-led Consortium, through Albertsons Investor, will have substantial demand and incidental registration rights, as described in “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Stockholders’ Agreement.” The market price for shares of our common stock may drop when the restrictions on resale by our Existing Owners lapse. We intend to file one or more registration statements on Form S-8 under the Securities Act to register shares of our common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for shares of our common stock issued pursuant to our 2015 Equity and Incentive Award

47

Table of Contents

Plan (the “2015 Incentive Plan”) and our Restricted Stock Unit Plan (the “Restricted Stock Unit Plan”). Any such Form S-8 registration statements will automatically become effective upon filing. Accordingly, shares registered under such registration statements will be available for sale in the open market. We expect that the initial registration statement on Form S-8 will cover 7.3% of the shares of our common stock. A decline in the market price of our common stock might impede our ability to raise capital through the issuance of additional shares of our common stock or other equity securities.

If equity research analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they issue unfavorable commentary or downgrade our common shares, the market price of our common stock could decline.

The trading market for our common shares likely will be influenced by the research and reports that equity and debt research analysts publish about the industry, us and our business. The market price of our common stock could decline if one or more securities analysts downgrade our shares or if those analysts issue a sell recommendation or other unfavorable commentary or cease publishing reports about us or our business. If one or more of the analysts who elect to cover us downgrade our shares, the market price of our common stock would likely decline.

Because we do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future, and our stockholders will not be guaranteed, or have contractual or other rights, to receive dividends. Our board of directors may, in its discretion, modify or repeal our dividend policy. The declaration and payment of dividends depends on various factors, including: our net income, financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

In addition, we are a holding company that does not conduct any business operations of our own. As a result, we are dependent upon cash dividends and distributions and other transfers from our subsidiaries to make dividend payments. Our subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends is restricted by agreements governing their debt instruments, and may be restricted by agreements governing any of our subsidiaries’ future indebtedness. Furthermore, our subsidiaries are permitted under the terms of their debt agreements to incur additional indebtedness that may severely restrict or prohibit the payment of dividends. See “Description of Indebtedness.”

Under the DGCL, our board of directors may not authorize payment of a dividend unless it is either paid out of our surplus, as calculated in accordance with the DGCL, or if we do not have a surplus, it is paid out of our net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year.

If you purchase shares of common stock sold in this offering, you will experience immediate and substantial dilution.

Our existing stockholders have paid substantially less than the initial public offering price of our common stock. The initial public offering price of our common stock will be substantially higher than the tangible book deficit per share of our outstanding common stock. Assuming an initial public offering price of $24.50 per share, the midpoint of the range on the cover of this prospectus, purchasers of our common stock will effectively incur dilution of $28.70 per share in the net tangible book value of their purchased shares. The shares of our common stock owned by existing stockholders will receive a material decrease in the net tangible book deficit per share. You may experience additional dilution if

48

Table of Contents

we issue common stock in the future. As a result of this dilution, you may receive significantly less than the full purchase price you paid for the shares in the event of a liquidation. See “Dilution.”

You may be diluted by the future issuance of additional common stock in connection with our equity incentive plans, acquisitions or otherwise.

After this offering, we will have 524,860,919 shares of common stock authorized but unissued under our certificate of incorporation. We will be authorized to issue these shares of common stock and options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to common stock for consideration and on terms and conditions established by our board of directors in its sole discretion, whether in connection with acquisitions or otherwise. We have reserved up to 7.3% of the shares of our common stock that will be available as of the consummation of this offering for issuance under existing restricted stock unit awards (following the conversion of our outstanding Phantom Unit awards granted under our Phantom Unit Plan (as defined herein)) and for future awards that may be issued under our 2015 Incentive Plan. See “Executive Compensation—Incentive Plans” and “Shares Eligible for Future Sale—Incentive Plans.” Any common stock that we issue, including under our 2015 Incentive Plan or other equity incentive plans that we may adopt in the future, would dilute the percentage ownership held by the investors who purchase common stock in this offering.

In the future, we may also issue our securities in connection with investments or acquisitions. The amount of shares of our common stock issued in connection with an investment or acquisition could constitute a material portion of our then-outstanding shares of common stock. Any issuance of additional securities in connection with investments or acquisitions may result in additional dilution to you.

49

Table of Contents