UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
¨ | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) or (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended 31 December 2015
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
¨ | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number: 1-6262
BP p.l.c.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
England and Wales
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
1 St Jamess Square, London SW1Y 4PD
United Kingdom
(Address of principal executive offices)
Dr Brian Gilvary
BP p.l.c.
1 St Jamess Square, London SW1Y 4PD
United Kingdom
Tel +44 (0) 20 7496 5311
Fax +44 (0) 20 7496 4573
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act
Title of each class |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
|
Ordinary Shares of 25c each | New York Stock Exchange* | |
Floating Rate Guaranteed Notes due 2016 | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Guaranteed Notes due 2017 | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Guaranteed Notes due February 2018 | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Guaranteed Notes due May 2018 | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Guaranteed Notes due September 2018 | New York Stock Exchange | |
Floating Rate Guaranteed Notes due 2019 | New York Stock Exchange | |
2.248% Guaranteed Notes due 2016 | New York Stock Exchange | |
3.200% Guaranteed Notes due 2016 | New York Stock Exchange | |
1.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2017 | New York Stock Exchange | |
1.846% Guaranteed Notes due 2017 | New York Stock Exchange | |
1.375% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 | New York Stock Exchange | |
1.674% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 | New York Stock Exchange | |
2.241% Guaranteed Notes due 2018 | New York Stock Exchange | |
4.750% Guaranteed Notes due 2019 | New York Stock Exchange | |
2.237% Guaranteed Notes due 2019 | New York Stock Exchange | |
2.315% Guaranteed Notes due 2020 | New York Stock Exchange | |
2.521% Guaranteed Notes due 2020 | New York Stock Exchange | |
4.500% Guaranteed Notes due 2020 | New York Stock Exchange | |
4.742% Guaranteed Notes due 2021 | New York Stock Exchange | |
3.561% Guaranteed Notes due 2021 | New York Stock Exchange | |
2.500% Guaranteed Notes due 2022 | New York Stock Exchange | |
3.245% Guaranteed Notes due 2022 | New York Stock Exchange | |
3.062% Guaranteed Notes due 2022 | New York Stock Exchange | |
2.750% Guaranteed Notes due 2023 | New York Stock Exchange | |
3.994% Guaranteed Notes due 2023 | New York Stock Exchange | |
3.535% Guaranteed Notes due 2024 | New York Stock Exchange | |
3.814% Guaranteed Notes due 2024 | New York Stock Exchange | |
3.506% Guaranteed Notes due 2025 | New York Stock Exchange |
* | Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.
Ordinary Shares of 25c each |
20,108,770,973 | |||
Cumulative First Preference Shares of £1 each |
7,232,838 | |||
Cumulative Second Preference Shares of £1 each |
5,473,414 |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No x
NoteChecking the box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 from their obligations under those Sections.
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).* Yes ¨ No ¨
* | This requirement does not apply to the registrant in respect of this filing. |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ¨ |
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board x |
Other ¨ |
If Other has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 ¨ Item 18 ¨
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
bp.com/annualreport
Who we are
We aim to create long-term value for
shareholders by helping to meet growing
demand for energy in a safe and responsible
way. We strive to be a world-class operator,
a responsible corporate citizen and a
good employer.
BP is one of the worlds leading integrated oil and gas companies - based on market capitalization, proved reserves and production. Through our work we provide customers with fuel for transportation, energy for heat and light, lubricants to keep engines moving and the petrochemicals products used to make everyday items as diverse as paints, clothes and packaging.
We believe a mix of fuels and technologies is needed to meet growing energy demand, improve efficiency and support the transition to a lower-carbon economy. These are the reasons why our portfolio includes oil, gas and renewables.
Our projects and operations help to generate employment, investment and tax revenues in countries and communities across the world. We have well-established operations in Europe, North and South America, Australasia, Asia and Africa and employ around 80,000 people.
Our proposition for value growth
For BP good business starts with a relentless focus on safe and reliable operations. Our portfolio enables us to develop high-quality opportunities from a broad set of options. We prioritize value over volume and invest where we can apply our distinctive strengths, capabilities and technologies.
Our objective is to create shareholder value by growing sustainable free cash flow and distributions over the long term through capital and cost discipline.
t
Front cover images
In Omans remote desert, we use our advanced technology to unlock gas from hot sandstone almost three miles below the earths surface. Construction work has started on the Khazzan field one of the Middle Easts largest unconventional gas resources and we expect first gas in late 2017.
Your feedback
We welcome your comments and feedback on our reporting. You can provide this at bp.com/annualreportfeedback or by emailing the corporate reporting team details are on the back cover.
Your views are important to us and help shape our reporting for future years.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | i |
ii | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
An overview of the key
|
2 |
|
||||||||||||||
6 |
|
|||||||||||||||
8 |
Group chief executives letter
|
|||||||||||||||
10 |
|
|||||||||||||||
12 |
Our business model and strategy
|
|||||||||||||||
18 |
|
|||||||||||||||
20 |
Our key performance indicators
|
|||||||||||||||
22 |
|
|||||||||||||||
22 |
Annual statement by the remuneration committee chair
|
|||||||||||||||
24 |
|
|||||||||||||||
26 |
|
|||||||||||||||
28 |
|
|||||||||||||||
34 |
|
|||||||||||||||
38 |
|
|||||||||||||||
40 |
|
|||||||||||||||
40 |
|
|||||||||||||||
41 |
|
|||||||||||||||
43 |
|
|||||||||||||||
43 |
|
|||||||||||||||
46 | Environment and society | |||||||||||||||
48 | Business ethics and transparency | |||||||||||||||
49 |
|
|||||||||||||||
51 |
|
|||||||||||||||
53 |
|
|||||||||||||||
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 1 |
2 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 3 |
BP around the world
4 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 5 |
$ 7.3 bn
dividends to BP shareholders
7.5 %
ordinary shareholders annual dividend yield «
7.7 %
ADS shareholders annual dividend yield « |
Dear fellow shareholder,
2015 has been another challenging year: oil prices have remained low, falling by more than 50% and our industry finds itself in a position not seen for some 30 years. This sustained low price is a result, not of lack of demand, but of oversupply. However, our work in reconfiguring BP following the incident in the Gulf of Mexico has meant that we were prepared and well positioned to respond to this volatile environment as we move through 2016.
Shareholders and distributions We have maintained our dividend during the year and remain committed to growing sustainable free cash flow and shareholder distributions over the long term. I believe that our current financial framework can support these commitments.
The board considers shareholder distributions in the context of how to achieve long-term growth and value creation. In the current weaker price environment, our aim is to rebalance our sources and uses of cash to ensure we cover capital expenditure and shareholder distributions with operating cash flow. a This will enable BP to continue to develop its business while maintaining safe and reliable operations. We anticipate that all the actions we are taking will capture more deflation and drive the point of rebalance to below $60 per barrel. The board will keep all of this under review and will make any adjustments to our financial framework as circumstances require.
Strategy The proposed consent decree with the United States federal government and settlements with the US Gulf states are an important step. It has enabled us to look at the future with greater confidence. However the current price environment continues to be a cause for concern and so we have set a financial path for the next two years. This medium-term strategy is based on optimizing our deployment and allocation of capital and the continuing simplification of our business while maintaining our commitment to safety and reliability.
Our financial results over the year demonstrated the benefit from the integration of our upstream and downstream activities. We have a strong, refocused and rebalanced portfolio based on our distinctive capabilities which we believe will enable us to withstand lower prices. In the future, we will continue to invest in a balanced range of resources and geographies across the Upstream and Downstream to enable us to achieve long-term growth.
We have recently published our BP Energy Outlook. I believe this makes an important contribution to the discourse and debate in this area. As the world continues to develop economically then oil, and increasingly gas, will be needed for the foreseeable future. This is the core of our business. Overall we keep under review the broader strategic direction of the group as the market for our products evolves and the energy landscape starts to change.
2015 has seen increased focus on climate change. BP has consistently argued for a price on carbon and recognized the part we all must play in being part of the solution. However governments must take the lead in developing policies to reduce carbon emissions and we continue to engage in this debate. The UN conference on climate change has produced
|
6 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Board performance For information about the board and its committees see page 55.
Remuneration For information about our directors remuneration see page 76.
|
some clear results and I am proud of the part that Bob has played in leading the initiative within our industry. At our last AGM in April the board was pleased to support a resolution brought by a group of our shareholders that encouraged greater disclosure of our work in this area; our evolving response to this is set out in our Sustainability Report due for publication this March.
Oversight The world continues to be a troubled place and the risks faced by BP are ever evolving. The board keeps under review its approach to the monitoring of risk as demonstrated by the boards oversight of cybersecurity and the sharpened focus on geopolitical risk through the formation of the geopolitical committee. This is complemented by the work of our international advisory board. As we progress with our litigation in the US, we expect to stand down the Gulf of Mexico committee during 2016 and I would like to thank my colleagues for the important work and focus they have given to this committee over the past five years. Oversight of the continuing litigation will fall to the full board.
Governance and succession Membership of the board has continued to be refreshed and during the year Paula Reynolds and Sir John Sawers joined us as non-executive directors. Paula brings deep experience from the financial and energy worlds, while John brings long experience of international politics and security that are so important to our business. Professor Dame Ann Dowling has taken the chair of the remuneration committee in anticipation of Antony Burgmans standing down from the board after twelve years. Antony has chaired the remuneration committee and is also chairing the newly formed geopolitical committee until April when Sir John Sawers will succeed him. Phuthuma Nhleko, who joined the board in 2011, has decided not to offer himself for re-election at the forthcoming AGM due to external business commitments. On behalf of the board I thank Antony and Phuthuma for the substantial contribution that they have made to all of our work.
In 2015 Bob and his executive team have worked determinedly to steer the business through some difficult times with some tough decisions. They have met every challenge and as a result the business is in robust shape as we go into 2016. They deserve our thanks as do all our employees. I would like to thank the board for all that they have done.
And I would like to thank our shareholders for your continued support. We are set to continue supplying energy to help meet global demand while delivering value to you from a great business.
Carl-Henric Svanberg Chairman 4 March 2016 |
|
q Top: The safety, ethics and environmental assurance committee (SEEAC) examine safety measures at our operations in the Khazzan field in Oman.
Bottom: SEEAC members meeting crew on the Cassia platform in Trinidad and Tobago where they inspected the safety of operations.
a See Our financial framework on page 19. |
||
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 7 |
Group chief executives letter
94.7 %
2015 refining availability « .
95 %
Upstream BP-operated plant reliability « . |
Dear fellow shareholder,
In 2015 we continued to adapt to the tough environment created by the dramatic drop in oil prices. We have seen prices crash before, but this fall has been particularly steep, from over $100 a barrel in mid-2014 to below $30 by January 2016. The work we have done to reshape and strengthen BP after 2010 stood us in good stead to withstand these conditions and last year we took further action to make the business more resilient in the short term. We also continue to invest for long-term growth. Our safety record improved, along with operating reliability, while costs came down and capital discipline was maintained. The current environment has however impacted our financial results, as well as those of our competitors. So, while the oil price is beyond our control, we have performed strongly on the factors that we can control.
A safer, more reliable, more resilient BP In terms of safety, our top priority, we achieved improvements year-on-year in all of our key safety measures process safety events, leaks, spills and other releases, and recordable injuries. This performance is at a much better level than five years ago and in line with the best among our peers. Safety is also good business. When we operate safely, our operations are more reliable. When the assets run reliably, they operate more continuously. When our operations run efficiently, we have better financial results.
In the current business environment, competitiveness depends on minimizing our costs and being disciplined in our use of limited capital as demonstrated by our organic capital expenditure in 2015 of $18.7 billion, down from nearly $23 billion in 2014. And we continue to focus our portfolio on the highest quality projects and operations, divesting $10 billion worth of assets in 2014 and 2015, in line with our target.
2015 was a challenging year for our Upstream business, with weaker oil and gas realizations leading to a significantly lower underlying pre-tax replacement cost profit of $1.2 billion. However, efficiency and reliability improved across the business in 2015. Upstream unit production costs were down 20% on 2013, and BP-operated plant reliability increased to 95% from 86% in 2011. We have made our base production more resilient by improving our reservoir management and increasing efficiencies in our drilling and operations lowering the decline rate and reducing non-productive time in drilling to its lowest level since 2011. And the decision to manage our US Lower 48 business separately is starting to deliver improvements in performance and competitiveness.
Our Downstream business had a record year, delivering $7.5 billion of underlying pre-tax replacement cost profit, demonstrating the benefit of being an integrated business. Our refining business is ranked among the top performers based on net cash margin in the most recent industry benchmark. We made improvements in safety, efficiency and operational performance, and continued to develop a portfolio of highly competitive assets and products. These include the launch in Spain of a new range of fuels with engine-cleaning and fuel-economy benefits, the unveiling of Nexcel from Castrol a technology with the potential to revolutionize the oil changing process in vehicles, and the start-up of Zhuhai 3 in China one of the most efficient purified terephthalic acid production units in the world.
|
8 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Strategy For more information on our strategic priorities and longer-term objectives see pages 12-17.
Industry context See how we are responding to the lower price environment on pages 18-19.
q Top: Bob Dudley meets Russian deputy prime minister for social affairs, Olga Golodets, at the London Science Museum Cosmonauts exhibition.
Bottom: Bob Dudley speaks with Pemex CEO, Emilio Lozoya Austin and Total CEO Patrick Pouyanné at the OGCI event in Paris.
|
Our executive vice president for corporate business activities, Katrina Landis, decided to step down after a very successful 24 years in BP. We have taken this opportunity to simplify and better align responsibilities within the team, appointing Lamar McKay as deputy chief executive, leading on key accountabilities such as strategy and safety, with Bernard Looney succeeding Lamar as Upstream chief executive.
Building a platform for growth The agreements we reached in July with US federal, state and the vast majority of local government bodies will, subject to court approval, settle our largest remaining legal exposures relating to the Deepwater Horizon accident and oil spill in 2010. This is a realistic outcome that gives BP clarity to plan for the future.
To build that future, we are continuing to invest in a disciplined way in a portfolio that is well balanced in several respects geographically across regions, across our upstream and downstream businesses and across resource types conventional and unconventional oil and gas, as well as the renewable energies of biofuels and wind. This gives us resilience and flexibility now and in the future.
In the Upstream, in addition to a well-managed base of existing operations, we had three major project start-ups in 2015 and we made final investment decisions on four projects, including the West Nile Delta project in Egypt, where we are seeing some best-in-class drilling performance. Looking ahead, we expect significant new production from projects starting up between 2015 and 2020, including our mega projects at Shah Deniz 2 in Azerbaijan and Khazzan in Oman, which will create value for decades. These projects are on time and on budget.
In the Downstream, we continue to focus on resilient and improving performance and growth from a quality portfolio of high-performing refineries, a competitive petrochemicals business and growing fuels marketing and lubricants businesses.
In 2015 we furthered our relationship with Rosneft to that of a strategic partner, with involvement in exploration, appraisal and production in some of the worlds most prolific oil and gas provinces. In China, we have signed new agreements to supply liquefied natural gas and to explore for shale gas. And we continue to build relationships in BPs historic heartlands of the Middle East, with growing opportunities in Oman, Kuwait, Egypt and Iraq.
Acting on climate change We continue to support action to address the risk of climate change. Through the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative a business coalition that accounts for over a fifth of global oil and gas production we are sharing best practices and developing common approaches, such as on the role of natural gas, the lowest-carbon fossil fuel and on energy efficiency. We also joined with BG Group, Eni, Reliance, Repsol, Royal Dutch Shell, Statoil and Total to call on the UN and governments to put a price on carbon so that businesses and consumers of energy can better work within frameworks that are clear.
We welcome the direction provided by the historic agreement reached at the UN climate conference in Paris. Governments, companies and consumers all have to make an appropriate contribution and we will continue to play our part through means including energy efficiency, renewable energy and increasing the share of natural gas in our portfolio.
Adapting for now and the future Over the years BP has responded to changing circumstances many times. Each time we have learned, adapted and evolved. This experience, gained over more than 100 years, is one of our greatest assets. Today, we are well placed to weather the storm and navigate through a testing environment to emerge in good shape for taking advantage of new opportunities. I am confident that BP will be delivering energy for our customers and value for our shareholders long into the future.
Bob Dudley Group chief executive 4 March 2016
|
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 9 |
We believe that a diverse mix of fuels and technologies will
be essential to meet the growing demand for energy and
challenges facing our industry.
Our markets in 2015 See page 24 for information on oil and gas prices in 2015.
Global energy consumption by region (billion tonnes of oil equivalent)
Source: BP Energy Outlook. |
Near-term outlook
The global economy continues to experience weaker growth in the main developing economies and slower than expected recovery in the developed world. World gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to grow by 2.8% in 2016, led by the OECD, but with significant downside risks from emerging economies, particularly commodity exporters.
After around four years of averaging about $100 per barrel, oil prices fell by nearly 50% in 2015. Even as US production growth stalled and global oil demand rebounded, a large increase in OPEC production continued to push inventories higher. Price declines continued into early 2016, with daily prices reaching levels not seen since 2004.
Prices are expected to remain low at least through the near term. And while we anticipate supply chain deflation in 2016 and beyond, as industry costs follow oil prices with a lag, this will be a tough period of intense change for the industry as it adapts to this new reality.
Long-term outlook
The world economy is likely to more than double from 2014 to 2035, largely driven by rising incomes in the emerging economies and a projected population increase of 1.5 billion.
We expect world demand for energy to increase by as much as 34% between 2014 and 2035. This is after taking into account improvements in energy efficiency, a shift towards less energy-intensive activities in fast-growing economies, governmental policies that incentivize lower-carbon activity, and national pledges made at the 2015 UN climate conference in Paris.
There are more than enough energy resources to meet this growing demand, but there are a number of challenges. |
Affordability Fossil fuels are currently cheaper than renewables but their future costs are hard to predict. Some fossil fuels may become more costly as the difficulty to access and process them increases; others may be more affordable with technological progress, as seen with US shale gas. While many renewables remain expensive, innovation and wider deployment are likely to bring down their costs.
Supply security Energy resources are often distant from the hubs of energy consumption and in places facing political uncertainties. More than half of the worlds known oil and natural gas reserves are located in just eight countries.
Sustainability Fossil fuels though plentiful and currently more affordable than other energy resources emit carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and other greenhouse gases (GHG) through their production and use in homes, industry and vehicles. Renewables are lower carbon but can have other environmental or social impacts, such as high water consumption or visual intrusion.
Effective policy
BP believes that carbon pricing is the most comprehensive and economically efficient policy to limit GHG emissions. Putting a price on carbon one that treats all carbon equally, whether it comes out of a smokestack or a car exhaust would make energy efficiency more attractive and lower-carbon energy sources, such as natural gas and renewables, more cost competitive. A carbon price incentivizes both energy producers and consumers to reduce their GHG emissions. Governments can put a price on carbon via a well-constructed carbon tax or cap-and-trade system. |
10 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
The BP Technology Outlook shows how technology can play a major role in meeting the energy challenge by widening energy resource choices, transforming the power sector, improving transport efficiency and helping to address climate concerns out to 2050.
See bp.com/technologyoutlook
BP Energy Outlook provides our projections of future energy trends and factors that could affect them out to 2035, based on our views of likely economic and population growth and developments in policy and technology. Also available in Excel and video format.
See bp.com/energyoutlook
Our strategy Find out how BP can help meet energy demand for years to come on page 12.
Climate change Our sector has an important part to play in addressing climate change. See page 46 to find out what BP is doing.
|
Energy efficiency
Greater efficiency helps with affordability because less energy is needed; with security because it reduces dependence on imports; and with sustainability because it reduces emissions. Innovation can play a key role in improving technology, bringing down cost and increasing efficiency. In transport, for example, we believe energy-efficient technologies and biofuels could offer the most cost-effective pathway to a secure, lower-carbon future.
All sorts of energy required
We believe a diverse mix of fuels and technologies is needed to meet growing energy demand, while supporting the transition to a lower-carbon economy. These are reasons why our portfolio includes oil, gas and renewables.
Oil and natural gas Over the next few decades, we think oil and natural gas are likely to continue to play a significant part in meeting demand for energy. They currently account for around 56% of total energy consumption, and we believe they will decrease to about 54% in 2035. For comparison, under the International Energy Agencys most ambitious climate policy scenario (the 450 scenario a ), oil and gas would still make up 50% of the energy mix in 2030 and 44% in 2040 assuming carbon capture and storage is widely deployed.
Oil is a good source of energy for transportation as it has a high energy density. That means vehicles go further on less weight and volume of fuel than alternatives. Also, oils liquid form makes it easy to move around, globally and locally. For these reasons, we expect oil to still account for almost 90% of transportation fuels in 2035 compared with 94% today.
Natural gas is likely to play an increasing role in meeting global energy demand, because its available at scale, relatively low cost and lower carbon than other fossil fuels. By 2035 gas is expected to provide 26% of global energy, placing it on a par with oil and coal.
a From World Energy Outlook 2015. © OECD/International Energy Agency 2015, page 35. The IEA 450 scenario assumes a set of policies that bring about a trajectory of greenhouse gas emissions from the energy sector that is consistent with limiting long-term average global temperature increase to 2°C.
|
We believe shale gas will contribute more than half of the growth in natural gas globally between 2014 and 2035. In the US, the growth of shale gas has already had a significant impact on gas demand as well as CO 2 emissions, which have fallen back to 1990s levels.
The increasing gas supply in the US and other countries is encouraging the use of liquefied natural gas worldwide, which is expected to double between 2014 and 2035.
New sources of hydrocarbons may be more difficult to reach, extract and process. BP and others in our industry are working to improve techniques for maximizing recovery from existing and currently inaccessible or undeveloped fields.
Renewables Renewables are the fastest-growing energy source. Over the past few years, there has been rapid expansion of the use of solar power due to cost reduction in manufacturing and public subsidies. That said, renewables, excluding large-scale hydroelectricity, currently account for around 3% of energy consumption. While they are starting from a low base, we estimate that by 2035 they will contribute around 9% of total global energy demand.
Temporary policy support is needed to help commercialize lower-carbon options and technologies, but they will ultimately need to become commercially self-sustaining, supported only by a carbon price.
Beyond 2035
We expect that growing population and per capita incomes will continue to drive growing demand for energy. These dynamics will be shaped by future technology developments, changes in tastes, and future policy choices all of which are inherently uncertain. Concerns about energy security, affordability and environmental impacts are all likely to be important considerations. These factors may accelerate the trend towards more diverse sources of energy supply, a lower average carbon footprint, increased efficiency and demand management. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 11 |
Our business model and strategy
We aim to create value for our investors and benefits for
the communities and societies where we operate.
p The new semi-submersible Deepsea Aberdeen drilling vessel carries out ultra-deepwater drilling in the UK North Sea.
{ An officer working in the under-deck pipe passageway on board BPs LNG tanker British Trader .
Illustrated business model For an at a glance overview of our business model see page 2.
Our businesses For more information on our upstream and downstream business models, see pages 28 and 34 respectively. |
Our business model
We believe the best way to achieve sustainable success as a group is to act in the long-term interests of our shareholders, our partners and society. By supplying energy, we support economic development and help to improve quality of life for millions of people. Our activities also generate jobs, investment, infrastructure and revenues for governments and local communities.
Our business model spans everything from exploration to marketing. We have a diverse integrated portfolio that is balanced across resource types, geographies and businesses, and adaptable to prevailing conditions. Our geographic diversity gives us access to growing markets and new resources and provides robustness to geopolitical events. |
By having upstream and downstream businesses and well established trading capabilities, we have a cushion to oil price volatility as downward pressures in one part of the group can create opportunities in another. Integration also allows us to share functional excellence more efficiently across areas such as safety and operational risk, environmental and social practices, procurement, technology and treasury management.
Every stage of the hydrocarbon value chain offers opportunities for us to create value, through both the successful execution of activities that are core to our industry, and the application of our own distinctive strengths and capabilities in performing those activities. |
|
12 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Industry context See how we are responding to the lower price environment on pages 18-19.
Our key performance indicators See how we measure our progress on page 20.
Risks Find out how we manage the risks to our strategy on page 51. |
A relentless focus on safety remains the top priority for everyone at BP. Rigorous management of risk helps to protect the people at the front line, the places where we operate and the value we create. We understand that operating in politically complex regions and technically demanding geographies requires particular sensitivity to local environments.
Our strategy
We prioritize value over volume by actively managing a high-value upstream and downstream portfolio and investing where we can apply the distinctive strengths, capabilities and technologies we have built up over decades.
We aim to create shareholder value by growing sustainable free cash flow « and distributions over the long term.
We are pursuing our strategy by setting clear priorities, actively managing a quality portfolio and employing our distinctive capabilities.
Clear priorities First, we aim to run safe, reliable and compliant operations leading to better operational efficiency and safety performance. We target competitive project execution to deliver projects as efficiently as possible. Making disciplined financial choices focused on capital and cost discipline allows us to maximize free cash flow and increase the resilience of our portfolio to changing price environments. |
Quality portfolio We undertake active portfolio management to concentrate on areas where we can play to our strengths. We focus on high-value upstream assets in deep water, giant fields, selected gas value chains and unconventionals « . And, in our downstream businesses, we plan to leverage our upgraded assets, customer relationships, brand and technology to continue to grow free cash flow.
Our portfolio of projects and operations is focused where we believe we can generate the most value, using our commercial agility and technical capability. This allows us to build a strong pipeline of future growth.
Distinctive capabilities Our ability to deliver against our priorities and build the right portfolio depends on our distinctive capabilities. We apply advanced technology across the hydrocarbon value chain, from finding resources to developing energy-efficient and high-performance products for customers. We work to develop and maintain strong relationships with governments, partners, civil society and others to enhance our operations in more than 70 countries across the globe. And the proven expertise of our employees comes to the fore in a wide range of disciplines. |
|
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 13 |
Our strategy in action
14 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
How we deliver | How we measure | Strategy in action in 2015 | ||||||||||
We prioritize the safety and reliability of our operations to protect the welfare of our workforce, local communities and the environment, and to improve the efficiency of our operations. This also helps preserve value and secure our right to operate around the world. | Recordable injury frequency, loss of primary containment, greenhouse gas emissions, tier 1 process safety events. |
Improving reliability Improvement plans are increasing UK North Sea plant reliability. See page 44. |
20 tier 1 process safety events 2014: 28 |
|||||||||
We rigorously screen our investments and we work to keep our annual capital expenditure within a set range. Ongoing management of our portfolio helps ensure focus on more value-driven propositions. We balance funds between shareholder distributions and investment for the future. | Operating cash flow, gearing, total shareholder return, underlying replacement cost profit per ordinary share. |
Capturing value Improving the quality of future investments. See page 30. |
$19.1 bn operating cash flow 2014: $32.8bn |
|||||||||
We seek efficient ways to deliver projects on time and on budget, from planning through to day-to-day operations. Our wide-ranging project experience makes us a valued partner and enhances our ability to compete.
|
Major project delivery. |
Adapting rapidly Using local knowledge to increase our competitiveness. See page 29.
|
3 major project start-ups in Upstream 2014: 7 |
|||||||||
We target opportunities with the greatest potential to increase value, using our commercial agility and technical capability. This allows us to build a strong pipeline for future growth. | Proved reserves replacement ratio. |
Unlocking energy potential Investing in exploration and development in Egypt. See page 33. |
61 % reserves replacement ratio a 2014: 63% |
|||||||||
We are strengthening our portfolio of high-return and longer-life assets across deep water, giant fields, gas value chains and unconventionals to provide BP with momentum for years to come. | Production. |
Optimizing our assets Using our technical expertise to maintain a secure and reliable supply. See page 31. |
3.3 million barrels of oil equivalent per day a 2014: 3.2 million |
|||||||||
We benefit from our high-performing fuels, lubricants, petrochemicals and biofuels businesses. Through premium products, powerful brands and supply and trading, Downstream provides strong cash generation for the group. | Refining availability. |
Improving operations Improvements at Castellón refinery are helping to increase profitability. See page 36. |
94.7 % refining availability 2014: 94.9% |
Creating shareholder value by generating sustainable free cash flow over the long term
|
|
|
|
||
Advanced technology | Strong relationships | Proven expertise | ||
We develop and deploy technologies we expect to make the greatest impact on our businesses from enhancing the safety and reliability of our operations to creating competitive advantage in energy discovery, recovery, efficiency and products. | We aim to form enduring partnerships in the countries in which we operate, building strong relationships with governments, customers, partners, suppliers and communities to create mutual advantage. Co-operation helps unlock resources found in challenging locations and transforms them into products for our customers. | Our talented people help to drive our business forward. They apply their diverse skills and expertise to deliver complex projects across all areas of our business. |
a On a combined basis of subsidiaries « and equity-accounted entities.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 15 |
Our distinctive capabilities
We aim to maintain a skilled workforce to deliver our strategy and meet our commitments to investors, partners and the wider world. We compete for the best people within the energy sector and other industries.
Our people are talented in a wide range of disciplines from geoscience, mechanical engineering and research technology to government affairs, trading, marketing, legal and others.
We have a bias towards building capability and promoting from within the organization and complement this with selective external recruitment. We invest in our employees development to build enduring capability for the future.
Our approach to professional development and training helps build individual capabilities. We believe our shared values help everyone at BP to contribute to their full potential. |
16 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Enhanced oil recovery (EOR)
Bright Water technology, invented by BP, helps to maximize oil production by recovering and moving more oil to our wells. We use it in more than 140 wells worldwide to date. It costs less than $5 to recover each additional barrel of oil released through Bright Water, and we deliver more light oil EOR production than any other international oil company. |
Lubricants
Castrols new technology, the Nexcel oil cell, is an easy-to-change unit containing both engine oil and filter. We believe the technology is a significant oil change innovation for the automotive industry. It is designed to lower CO 2 emissions, improve vehicle servicing and increase the recycling of used oil for cars of the future. |
Petrochemicals
BP is one of the worlds largest producers of purified terephthalic acid (PTA), a raw material for many consumer products. In 2015 we entered into licensing agreements in Oman and China, for plants that will use our latest generation PTA technology, with a combined capacity to produce more than two million tonnes of PTA each year. |
||
Corrosion prevention
We use automated phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) across our refineries to safely inspect our tanks and pipelines. Our PAUT technology uses ultrasonic pulses to examine the integrity of these assets and detect cracks in a non-destructive way. The technique reduces facility downtime, decreases turnaround costs and risks, and avoids production losses. |
Fuels
BP began marketing a range of dirt-busting fuels with a launch in Spain in 2015. The fuels contain our new ACTIVE technology that cleans and protects car engines with proprietary additives. Our fuels are designed to remove deposits and prevent their formation helping engines perform in the way they were designed to do. |
Biofuels
We are developing biobutanol in conjunction with DuPont. This second-generation biofuel can be blended into gasoline in greater proportions and is more compatible than ethanol with the infrastructure used for existing fuel supplies. |
||
|
||||
We work closely with governments, national oil companies, other resource holders and local communities to build long-lasting relationships that are crucial to the success of our business.
We place enormous importance on acting responsibly and meeting our obligations as we know from experience that trust can be lost. We work on big and complex projects with partners ranging from other oil companies to suppliers and contractors. Our activity creates value that benefits governments, shareholders, customers, local communities and other partners.
We believe good communication and open dialogue are vital if we are to meet their expectations. |
Internally we put together collaborative teams of people with the skills and experience needed to address complex issues, work effectively with our partners, engage with our stakeholders and help create shared value. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 17 |
We are taking action to adapt to a lower oil and gas price environment while maintaining longer-term growth prospects.
Since 2010, we have been working to create a stronger, simpler and more focused business. This has positioned us well to respond to the lower oil and gas price environment. We are reducing capital expenditure by paring back and rephasing activities as necessary, as well as capturing the benefits of deflation of industry costs. We are driving down cash costs « through a reduction in third-party costs, and through efficiency and simplification across the organization. As always, safe and reliable operations are our first priority.
t Remodelling Mad Dog Phase 2 reduced our project cost estimate by more than half. |
Industry context
Between 2010 to mid-2014 oil prices were relatively stable, averaging around $100 per barrel. In 2014, strong supply growth, largely as a result of growth in US shale, caused oil prices to fall sharply. Prices fell further in 2015 as OPEC production increased and supply continued to outstrip demand. There are, however, increasing signs that the market is adjusting to the current low level of prices, with strong demand growth and weakening supply. The high level of inventories suggests that this adjustment process is likely to take some time, but it does appear to be underway. This underpins our belief that prices will stay lower for longer, but not forever.
Gas prices also fell, albeit on a more regional and less dramatic scale. In markets such as the US, gas prices are at historically low levels, with increases in production from shale being a key factor. |
Low prices are having a significant effect on our industry, including BP. With falling revenues, companies need to re-base costs and activity a process that could take several years. We expect 2016 to be a period of intense change, with ongoing restructuring and further deflation in the supply chain. That said, periods of low prices are not uncommon in our industry and BP has gone through such cycles in the past.
For BP, the lower prices significantly impacted our 2015 financial results. The result for the year was a loss of $6.5 billion. Underlying replacement cost profit « was $5.9 billion (2014 $12.1 billion) and operating cash flow « was $19.1 billion (2014: $32.8 billion). |
Sources and uses of cash
The cash flow from our Upstream operations was significantly lower than in 2014 although Downstream cash flows were strong. We significantly reduced the capital expenditure of the group as well as received proceeds from divestments. The strength of our balance sheet helped us meet the balance of outgoings. |
18 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Our financial framework
Our financial framework is designed to re-establish a balance where operating cash flow (excluding payments related to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill) covers organic capital expenditure « and the current level of dividend per share by 2017, based on an average Brent « price of around $60 per barrel.
If prices remain lower for longer than anticipated, we expect to continue to recalibrate for the weaker environment and to capture more deflation. We would expect this to drop the balance point below $60 per barrel.
We will keep our financial framework under review as we monitor oil and gas prices and their impact on industry costs as we move through 2016 and beyond. |
Our financial framework through 2017 Underpinning our commitment to sustain the dividend for our shareholders
|
|||||||
Principle | 2015 achievement | Looking ahead | ||||||
Optimize capital expenditure |
g |
2015 organic capital expenditure was $18.7 billion.
This is 18% down from the 2011-2014 period average. |
We expect capital expenditure of $17-19 billion per year in 2016 and 2017 as a result of reducing costs and activity, with 2016 spend towards the lower end of this range. |
|||||
Reduce cash costs |
g |
We made significant progress in reducing cash costs compared with 2014. |
We anticipate the reduction in our cash costs to be close to $7 billion versus 2014 by the end of 2017. |
|||||
Make selective divestments |
g |
We completed the $10-billion divestment programme announced for 2014-2015. |
We expect divestments of $3-5 billion in 2016 and $2-3 billion per year from 2017 to help manage oil price volatility and fund the ongoing Gulf of Mexico commitments. |
|||||
Maintain flexibility around gearing |
g |
Gearing « at the end of 2015 was 21.6% against a 2011-2014 average of 18%. |
Looking ahead, we aim to manage gearing with some flexibility at around 20%. While oil prices remain weak, we expect gearing to be above 20%. |
|||||
How we are putting this into action
Upstream
We are focusing on the timing of investments to capture deflation in the supply chain, paring back access and exploration spend and prioritizing activity in our base operations. Where we are not the operator, we are influencing partners to focus on third-party costs.
We reduced unit production costs by more than 20% compared with 2013 and achieved an average reduction of 15% in upstream third-party costs in 2015. By the end of 2016, we expect to re-bid 40% of our third-party spend, including a significant proportion of our well services contracts.
Our total upstream workforce including employees and contractors is now 20% smaller than it was in 2013, with a reduction of around 4,000 expected in 2016. We are aiming for an upstream workforce of approximately 20,000 by the end of 2016. |
Downstream
In 2015 we reorganized our fuels business from nine regions to three, streamlined the lubricants business and started restructuring petrochemicals. We are implementing site-by-site improvement programmes to drive manufacturing efficiency in refining and petrochemicals. Our focus on third-party spend has resulted in significant cost reductions and we have reduced head office related costs by around 40%.
These simplification and efficiency actions have significantly contributed to the groups cash cost reductions in 2015.
We expect to reduce our downstream workforce roles by more than 5,000 by the end of 2017 compared with 2014, and by the end of 2015 had already achieved a reduction of more than 2,000. |
Other businesses and corporate
We made significant progress in reducing corporate and functional costs in 2015. We are focusing on third-party spend and headcount both in response to the lower oil price and also to reflect the changes to our portfolio. |
||||||
Figures exclude retail staff and agricultural, operational and seasonal workers in Brazil. |
||||||||
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 19 |
Our key performance indicators
We assess our performance across a wide range of measures and indicators. Our key performance indicators (KPIs) help the board and executive management measure performance against our strategic priorities and business plans. We periodically review our metrics and test their relevance to our strategy. We believe non-financial measures such as safety and an engaged and diverse workforce have a useful role to play as leading indicators of future performance.
Remuneration To help align the focus of our board and executive management with the interests of our shareholders, certain measures are reflected in the variable elements of executive remuneration.
Overall annual bonuses, deferred bonuses and performance shares are all based on performance against measures and targets linked directly to strategy and KPIs.
Directors remuneration See how our performance impacted 2015 pay on page 76.
Key
KPIs used to measure progress against our strategy.
KPIs used to determine 2015 and 2016 remuneration.
|
Underlying RC profit « per ordinary share (cents)
Underlying RC profit is a useful measure for investors because it is one of the profitability measures BP management uses to assess performance. It assists management in understanding the underlying trends in operational performance on a comparable year-on-year basis.
It reflects the replacement cost of inventories sold in the period and is arrived at by excluding inventory holding gains and losses « from profit or loss. Adjustments are also made for non-operating items « and fair value accounting effects « . The IFRS equivalent can be found on page 216.
2015 performance The significant reduction in underlying RC profit per ordinary share for the year compared with 2014 was mainly due to lower profit in Upstream.
|
Operating cash flow ($ billion)
Operating cash flow is net cash flow provided by operating activities, as reported in the group cash flow statement. Operating activities are the principal revenue-generating activities of the group and other activities that are not investing or financing activities.
2015 performance Operating cash flow was lower in 2015, largely reflecting the impact of the lower oil price environment. |
Gearing (net debt ratio) « (%)
Our gearing (net debt ratio) shows investors how significant net debt is relative to equity from shareholders in funding BPs operations.
We aim to keep our gearing around 20% to give us the flexibility to deal with an uncertain environment.
Gearing is calculated by dividing net debt by total equity plus net debt. Net debt is equal to gross finance debt, plus associated derivative financial instruments, less cash and cash equivalents. For the nearest equivalent measure on an IFRS basis and for further information see Financial statements Note 26.
2015 performance Gearing at the end of 2015 was 21.6%, up 4.9% on 2014. |
|||
|
||||||
Refining availability (%) | Reported recordable injury frequency a | Loss of primary containment a | ||||
Refining availability represents Solomon Associates operational availability. The measure shows the percentage of the year that a unit is available for processing after deducting the time spent on turnaround activity and all mechanical, process and regulatory downtime.
Refining availability is an important indicator of the operational performance of our Downstream businesses.
2015 performance Refining availability was similar to 2014. |
Reported recordable injury frequency (RIF) measures the number of reported work-related employee and contractor incidents that result in a fatality or injury (apart from minor first aid cases) per 200,000 hours worked.
The measure gives an indication of the personal safety of our workforce.
2015 performance Our workforce RIF, which includes employees and contractors combined, was 0.24. This improvement on 2014 was also reflected in our other occupational safety metrics. While this is encouraging, continued vigilance is needed. |
Loss of primary containment (LOPC) is the number of unplanned or uncontrolled releases of oil, gas or other hazardous materials from a tank, vessel, pipe, railcar or other equipment used for containment or transfer.
By tracking these losses we can monitor the safety and efficiency of our operations as well as our progress in making improvements.
2015 performance We have seen a decrease in our loss of primary containment to 235. Figures for 2014 and 2015 include increased reporting due to the introduction of enhanced automated monitoring for remote sites in our US Lower 48 business. Using a like-for-like approach with prior years reporting, our 2015 loss of primary containment figure is 208 (2014 246). |
||||
20 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Total shareholder return (%) | Reserves replacement ratio (%) | Major project delivery | Production (mboe/d) | |||
Total shareholder return (TSR) represents the change in value of a BP shareholding over a calendar year. It assumes that dividends are reinvested to purchase additional shares at the closing price on the ex-dividend date. We are committed to maintaining a progressive and sustainable dividend policy.
2015 performance Negative TSR in the year reflects the fall in the BP share price exceeding the dividend. |
Proved reserves replacement ratio is the extent to which the years production has been replaced by proved reserves added to our reserve base.
The ratio is expressed in oil-equivalent terms and includes changes resulting from discoveries, improved recovery and extensions and revisions to previous estimates, but excludes changes resulting from acquisitions and disposals. The ratio reflects both subsidiaries « and equity- accounted entities.
This measure helps to demonstrate our success in accessing, exploring and extracting resources.
2015 performance This years reserves replacement ratio was similar to 2014. See page 229 for more information.
|
Major projects are defined as those with a BP net investment of at least $250 million, or considered to be of strategic importance to BP, or of a high degree of complexity.
We monitor the progress of our major projects to gauge whether we are delivering our core pipeline of activity.
Projects take many years to complete, requiring differing amounts of resource, so a smooth or increasing trend should not be anticipated.
2015 performance We delivered three major projects in Upstream two in Angola and one in Asia Pacific, and started up Zhuhai 3 in Downstream. |
We report production of crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids (NGLs), natural bitumen and natural gas on a volume per day basis for our subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities. Natural gas is converted to barrels of oil equivalent at 5,800 standard cubic feet of natural gas = 1 boe.
2015 performance BPs total reported production including Upstream and Rosneft segments was 4.0% higher than in 2014. This was mainly due to favourable entitlement impact in our production-sharing agreements in the Upstream segment. |
|||
Tier 1 process safety events « a |
Greenhouse gas emissions b (million tonnes of CO 2 equivalent) |
Group priorities index d (%) | Diversity and inclusion d (%) | |||
We report tier 1 process safety events, which are the losses of primary containment of greatest consequence causing harm to a member of the workforce, costly damage to equipment or exceeding defined quantities.
2015 performance The number of tier 1 process safety events has decreased substantially since 2011. We believe our systematic approach to safety management and assurance is contributing to improved performance over the long term and will maintain our focus in these areas.
|
We provide data on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions material to our business on a carbon dioxide-equivalent basis. This includes carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) and methane for direct emissions. Our GHG KPI encompasses all BPs consolidated entities as well as our share of equity-accounted entities other than BPs share of TNK-BP and Rosneft. c
2015 performance The increase in our reported emissions is due to updating the global warming potential for methane. Without this update, our emissions would have decreased primarily due to divestments in Alaska.
|
We track how engaged our employees are with our strategic priorities using our group priorities index. This is derived from survey questions about their perceptions of BP as a company and how it is managed in terms of leadership and standards.
2015 performance Our group priorities engagement measure fell slightly in 2015, as expected in the current low oil price environment. |
Each year we report the percentage of women and individuals from countries other than the UK and the US among BPs group leaders. This helps us track progress in building a diverse and well-balanced leadership team.
2015 performance The percentage of our group leaders who are women or non-UK/US rose slightly. We remain committed to our aim that women will represent at least 25% of our group leaders by 2020. |
|||
a This represents reported incidents occurring within BPs operational HSSE reporting boundary. That boundary includes BPs own operated facilities and certain other locations or situations. |
b The 2015 figure reflects our update of the global warming potential for methane from 21 to 25, in line with IPIECAs guidelines. c For more information on our GHG emissions see page 46. |
d Relates to BP employees. |
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 21 |
In a difficult environment, BPs leadership delivered strong operating performance,
based on a sound strategy and consistently improved safety performance. They have
acted early and decisively in response to low oil prices to preserve future growth.
22 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
The safety and operational risk performance has been excellent. This has led to increased reliability and more efficient operations. There is a proposed settlement of the federal and state claims and settlement of most of the local government claims relating to the Deepwater Horizon incident. BP responded quickly and decisively to the drop in oil price, continuing to simplify its activities and significantly reducing its cost base. Capital discipline has been demonstrated in a strategic way that offers flexibility and resilience now and options for future growth. Our belief is that management has delivered very well in a difficult year.
The overall group score achieved was 1.91 out of a maximum of 2.00. As is our normal practice, the committee reviewed this result and considered whether it produced a fair outcome in light of the underlying performance of the company and the wider environment. As part of this both the committee and the group chief executive believed some recognition of the dramatic fall in oil prices and its impact on shareholders was warranted. As a result the group score was lowered to 1.70 and this has been used to determine annual bonuses for BPs wider management group. For executive directors our approved policy limits annual bonus to 1.50.
Long-term performance
The 2012 deferred bonus was contingent on safety and environmental sustainability over a three-year period. The committee saw good evidence of a continued improvement on safety that is both ingrained in the culture and has led to more reliable and efficient operations. The award vested in full.
The 2013-15 performance share plan was, as in previous years, based on three sets of measures equally weighted: relative total shareholder return (TSR) over the three-year period, 2015 operating cash flow and finally, strategic imperatives which included safety and operational risk, relative reserves replacement ratio (RRR) and major project delivery over the three years.
For TSR, BP was in third place. The target set in 2013 for operating cash flow in 2015 was $35 billion based on the plan assumptions. At the start of the year, this was normalized for the change in oil and gas price, and refining margins since 2013. We also, as in previous years, adjusted for major divestments and for contributions to the Gulf of Mexico restoration. The resulting target was $17.7 billion. This compared to an outcome of $19.1 billion. Safety performance at the end of the three-year period, against targets previously set at the outset, was strong. The final results from the comparator group for RRR are not yet available but on the evidence, our preliminary assessment is that the company is in first place. There will be a final assessment later in the year. Major project delivery exceeded target.
As a result 77.6% of the shares are expected to vest. Reviewing the period 2013-15, the committee believes that this represents a fair outcome. In that time there has been the delivery of the 10-point plan in 2014, consistent improvements in safety performance and effective budgetary and capital discipline in difficult circumstances. |
Long-term: performance share plan
|
|||||||||||||
Measure |
Result | Target | Outcome | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Relative TSR | BPs TSR ranked third versus other oil majors. |
Outperform peers |
Third | |||||||||||
Operating cash flow | Strong operating cash flow in 2015 relative to plan. | $17.7bn | $19.1bn | |||||||||||
Strategic imperatives | ||||||||||||||
Relative reserves replacement ratio (RRR) |
BPs RRR preliminary ranked first versus other oil majors.
|
Outperform peers |
First | |||||||||||
Safety and operational risk: |
Downward trend over the last three years. |
|||||||||||||
Loss of primary containment | £ 212 events | 208 events a | ||||||||||||
Process safety tier 1 events | £ 30 events | 20 events | ||||||||||||
Recordable injury frequency | £ 0.240/200k | 0.223/200k | ||||||||||||
hours b | hours | |||||||||||||
Major project delivery | 15 major projects were commissioned. | 11 | 15 | |||||||||||
a Adjusted in accordance with the treatment of the loss of primary containment key performance indicator on page 20. b Excluding biofuels. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Pay outcomes
The resulting remuneration for executive directors is shown below. Consistent with the wider population of BP employees, executive directors received no increase in base salary in 2015. This is being continued with no salary increase for the senior leadership and executive directors in 2016.
As described above, annual bonus was limited to a group score of 1.50, the 2012 deferred bonus vested fully and 77.6% of shares in the 2013-2015 performance share plan are expected to vest. These will be finally determined later in the year when results from all oil majors are known. The shares that vest will have a further |
three-year retention period before being released to the individual.
In our assessment, the overall quantum of remuneration is market competitive and represents a balanced outcome. It is based heavily on performance and mainly paid in equity with long retention periods. Executive directors are required to hold shares in excess of five-times salary. While the value of their shares has, as for all shareholders, dropped with the oil price, they satisfy that requirement.
For the single figure remuneration table see page 77. |
|||||||||||||
Total remuneration (excluding pensions) | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Conclusion
In conclusion, BP has performed well and surpassed the boards expectations on almost all of the measures. I am pleased that our current policy has appropriately recognized this in the 2015 outcomes. There remain challenging times with an evolving remuneration landscape. During 2016, the committee will be undertaking a full review of our policy. I have already met with some of our key shareholders and look forward to continuing this engagement as we develop a |
new proposed policy for approval at the 2017 Annual General Meeting.
BP is a strong company with strong leadership. The company continues to evolve as will our remuneration policy and practice to ensure we remain performance driven and competitive.
Professor Dame Ann Dowling Chair of the remuneration committee |
|||||||||||||
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 23 |
A snapshot of the challenging global energy market in 2015.
p More than 200 of our UK BP stores have an M&S Simply Food ® outlet. This premium offer is helping to drive overall service station sales growth.
{ Construction of Glen Lyon, our new 270 metre long floating, production, storage and offloading vessel, at a shipyard in South Korea.
BP Statistical Review of World Energy
See
bp.com/statisticalreview
for an
Crude oil prices (quarterly average)
Natural gas prices (quarterly average)
|
The global economy struggled to return to a more normal pace of growth in 2015 GDP growth estimates were revised down over the course of the year, with latest estimates indicating that the world economy grew by 2.5% in 2015, compared to trend growth of around 3%. Slowing growth in China contributed to falling commodity prices, weak global trade and weakening emerging market growth. The developed world also failed to take off as expected with the US, EU and Japan all underperforming.
Oil
Crude oil prices averaged $52.39 per barrel in 2015, as demonstrated by the industry benchmark of dated Brent « , nearly $47 per barrel below the 2014 average of $98.95. This was the largest oil price decline ever in inflation-adjusted terms and it was the third-largest percentage decline (behind 1873 and 1986). Prices recovered in the second quarter, averaging nearly $62, but fell later in the year as OPEC production increased and inventories grew. Brent prices ended the year near $35.
In response to the sharp decline in world oil prices, global oil consumption increased by an above-average 1.6 million barrels per day (mmb/d) for the year (1.7%). a While emerging economies accounted for the majority of growth, the mature economies of the OECD recorded a rare increase as well. The robust growth in consumption was once again exceeded by growth in global production. Non-OPEC production growth slowed to 1.4mmb/d as US production peaked in the second quarter in the face of a rapid contraction in investment and drilling. a OPEC crude oil production, however, accelerated, growing by 1.1mmb/d in 2015. a As a result, OECD commercial oil inventories reached record levels late in the year.
a From IEA Oil Market Report, February 2016 ©, OECD/IEA 2016, Page 4. b BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2015. |
In 2014 global oil consumption grew by roughly 0.8 million barrels per day (0.8%), significantly slower than the increase in global production (2.3%). b Non-OPEC production once again accounted for all the net global increase, driven by record US growth.
Natural gas
Global price differentials in 2015 continued to narrow. US gas prices and Asian transacted LNG prices were more than 40% lower, while European transacted LNG prices were 15% lower. The Henry Hub « First of the Month index fell from $4.43 per million British thermal units (mmBtu) in 2014 to $2.67 in 2015 as supply growth continued to be resilient.
Transacted LNG prices in Europe and Asia fell with rising global LNG supplies and weak demand growth. New LNG projects in Papua New Guinea and Australia and recovering supplies in Africa added 1.4bcf/d of supply capacity to the LNG market in 2015.
Moderating demand and ample supplies from both Russia and LNG markets reduced the UK National Balancing Point « hub price to an average of 42.61 pence per therm in 2015 (2014 50.01). The Japanese spot price fell to an average of $7.45/mmBtu in 2015 (2014 $13.86) with weaker demand from North Asian consumers coinciding with rising supplies in the region.
In 2014 growth in natural gas consumption was at its slowest rate for the last 20 years with the exception of the financial crisis of 2008-09. Broad differentials between regional gas prices narrowed considerably, as US gas prices continued their recovery from their 2012 lows. Global LNG supply capacity expanded further in 2014, following a small increase in 2013, while growth in LNG demand moderated.
Prices and margins See pages 29 and 35. |
24 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
BP is embedding cost efficiency and simplification into everyday activities
as well as
large-scale changes in response to market conditions.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 25 |
A summary of our group financial and
operating performance.
p
A technician monitors the pressure gauges in the enhanced oil recovery laboratory in Sunbury.
Financial and operating performance
$ million | ||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
(7,918 | ) | 6,412 | 31,769 | ||||||||
Finance costs and net finance expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
(1,653 | ) | (1,462 | ) | (1,548 | ) | ||||||
Taxation |
3,171 | (947 | ) | (6,463 | ) | |||||||
Non-controlling interests |
(82 | ) | (223 | ) | (307 | ) | ||||||
Profit (loss) for the year a |
(6,482 | ) | 3,780 | 23,451 | ||||||||
Inventory holding (gains) losses « , net of tax |
1,320 | 4,293 | 230 | |||||||||
Replacement cost profit (loss) « |
(5,162 | ) | 8,073 | 23,681 | ||||||||
Net charge (credit) for non-operating items « , net of tax |
11,272 | 4,620 | (10,533 | ) | ||||||||
Net (favourable) unfavourable impact of fair value accounting effects « , net of tax |
(205 | ) | (557 | ) | 280 | |||||||
Underlying replacement cost profit « |
5,905 | 12,136 | 13,428 | |||||||||
Dividends paid per share cents |
40.0 | 39.0 | 36.5 | |||||||||
pence |
26.383 | 23.850 | 23.399 | |||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions, on an accruals basis |
19,531 | 23,781 | 36,612 |
a | Profit (loss) attributable to BP shareholders. |
The result for the year ended 31 December 2015 was a loss of $6.5 billion, compared with a profit of $3.8 billion in 2014. Excluding inventory holding losses, replacement cost (RC) loss was $5.2 billion, compared with a profit of $8.1 billion in 2014.
After adjusting for a net charge for non-operating items, which mainly related to the agreements in principle to settle federal, state and the vast majority of local government claims arising from the 2010 Deepwater Horizon accident and impairment charges; and net favourable fair value accounting effects, underlying RC profit for the year ended 31 December 2015 was $5.9 billion, a decrease of $6.2 billion compared with 2014. The reduction was mainly due to a significantly lower profit in Upstream, partially offset by improved earnings from Downstream.
Non-operating items in 2015 also included $1,088 million for restructuring charges that largely relate to rationalization and reorganization costs in response to the low oil and gas price environment. A further $1.0 billion of restructuring charges are expected to be incurred in 2016.
Profit for the year ended 31 December 2014 decreased by $19.7 billion compared with 2013. Excluding inventory holding losses, RC profit decreased by $15.6 billion compared with 2013. Both results in 2013 included a $12.5-billion non-operating gain relating to the disposal of our interest in TNK-BP.
After adjusting for a net charge for non-operating items, which mainly related to impairments and further charges associated with the Gulf of Mexico oil spill; and net favourable fair value accounting effects, underlying RC profit for the year ended 31 December 2014 was down by $1.3 billion compared with 2013. The reduction was mainly due to a lower profit in Upstream, partially offset by improved earnings from Downstream.
More information on non-operating items, and fair value accounting effects, can be found on page 217. See Gulf of Mexico oil spill on page 41 and Financial statements Note 2 for further information on the impact of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill on BPs financial results.
See Upstream on page 28, Downstream on page 34, Rosneft on page 38 and Other businesses and corporate on page 40 for further information on segment results. Also see page 41 for further information on the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. |
Taxation
The credit for corporate income taxes in 2015 reflects the deferred tax impact of the increased provisions in respect of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The effective tax rate (ETR) was 33% in 2015 (2014 19%, 2013 21%).
The ETR in 2015 compared with 2014 was impacted by various one-off items. Adjusting for inventory holding impacts, non-operating items, fair value accounting effects and the one-off deferred tax adjustment in 2015 as a result of the reduction in the UK North Sea supplementary charge, the underlying ETR on RC profit was 31% in 2015 (2014 36%, 2013 35%). The underlying ETR for 2015 is lower than 2014 mainly due to changes in the geographical mix of profits.
The ETR in 2014 was similar to 2013 and was relatively low in both years. The low ETR in 2014 reflected the impairment charges on which tax credits arise in relatively high tax rate jurisdictions. The ETR in 2013 reflected the gain on disposal of TNK-BP in 2013 for which there was no corresponding tax charge.
In the current environment, and with our existing portfolio of assets, the underlying ETR in 2016 is expected to be lower than 2015 due to the anticipated mix of profits moving away from relatively high tax Upstream jurisdictions.
26 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Cash flow and net debt information
$ million | ||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
19,133 | 32,754 | 21,100 | |||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(17,300 | ) | (19,574 | ) | (7,855 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(4,535 | ) | (5,266 | ) | (10,400 | ) | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
26,389 | 29,763 | 22,520 | |||||||||
Gross debt |
53,168 | 52,854 | 48,192 | |||||||||
Net debt « |
27,158 | 22,646 | 25,195 | |||||||||
Gross debt to gross debt-plus-equity |
35.1% | 31.9% | 27.0% | |||||||||
Net debt to net debt-plus-equity « |
21.6% | 16.7% | 16.2% |
KPIs used to measure progress against our strategy.
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended 31 December 2015 was $13.6 billion lower than 2014, of which $1.1 billion related to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. This was principally a result of the lower oil price environment, although there were benefits of reduced working capital requirements and lower tax paid.
There was an increase of $11.7 billion in 2014 compared with 2013. Profit before taxation was lower but this was partially offset by movements in the adjustments for non-cash items, including depreciation, depletion and amortization, impairments and gains and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets. Furthermore, 2014 was impacted by a favourable movement in working capital.
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended 31 December 2015 decreased by $2.3 billion compared with 2014. The decrease mainly reflected a reduction in capital expenditure of $3.9 billion in response to the lower oil price environment, partly offset by a reduction of $0.7 billion in disposal proceeds.
The increase of $11.7 billion in 2014 compared with 2013 reflected a decrease in disposal proceeds of $18.5 billion, partly offset by a $4.9-billion decrease in our investments in equity-accounted entities, mainly relating to the completion of the sale of our interest in TNK-BP and subsequent investment in Rosneft in 2013. There was also a decrease in our other capital expenditure excluding acquisitions of $2.0 billion.
There were no significant acquisitions in 2015, 2014 and 2013.
The group has had significant levels of capital investment for many years. Cash flow in respect of capital investment, excluding acquisitions, was $20.2 billion in 2015 (2014 $23.1 billion and 2013 $30 billion). Sources of funding are fungible, but the majority of the groups funding requirements for new investment comes from cash generated by existing operations.
We expect capital expenditure, excluding acquisitions and asset exchanges, to be at the lower end of the range of $17-19 billion in 2016.
Total cash disposal proceeds received during 2015 were $2.8 billion (2014 $3.5 billion, 2013 $22.0 billion). In 2015 this included amounts received from our Toledo refinery partner, Husky Energy, in place of capital commitments relating to the original divestment transaction that have not been subsequently sanctioned. In 2013 this included $16.7 billion for the disposal of BPs interest in TNK-BP. See Financial statements Note 4 for more information on disposals.
We have now completed the $10-billion divestment programme which we announced in 2013. We expect divestments to be around $3-5 billion in 2016 and ongoing divestments to be around $2-3 billion per annum thereafter.
Net cash used in financing activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended 31 December 2015 decreased by $0.7 billion compared with 2014. There were no share repurchases in 2015, compared with $4.6 billion in 2014. This was largely offset by lower net proceeds from financing of $3.2 billion ($4.4 billion
lower net proceeds from long-term debt offset by an increase of $1.2 billion in short-term debt).
The decrease of $5.1 billion in 2014 compared with 2013 primarily reflected higher net proceeds of $3.3 billion from long-term financing and a decrease in the net repayment of short-term debt of $1.3 billion. The $8-billion share repurchase programme was completed in July 2014.
Total dividends paid in 2015 were 40 cents per share, up 2.6% compared with 2014 on a dollar basis and 10.6% in sterling terms. This equated to a total cash distribution to shareholders of $6.7 billion during the year (2014 $5.9 billion, 2013 $5.4 billion).
Net debt
Net debt at the end of 2015 increased by $4.5 billion from the 2014 year-end position. The net debt ratio « at the end of 2015 increased by 4.9%.
The total cash and cash equivalents at the end of 2015 were $3.4 billion lower than 2014.
We aim to maintain the net debt ratio, with some flexibility, at around 20%. We expect the net debt ratio to be above 20% while oil prices remain weak. Net debt and the net debt ratio are non-GAAP measures. See Financial statements Note 26 for gross debt, which is the nearest equivalent measure on an IFRS basis, and for further information on net debt.
For information on financing the groups activities, see Financial statements Note 28 and Liquidity and capital resources on page 219.
Group reserves and production
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Estimated net proved reserves
a
|
||||||||||||
Liquids « (mmb) |
9,560 | 9,817 | 10,070 | |||||||||
Natural gas (bcf) |
44,197 | 44,695 | 45,975 | |||||||||
Total hydrocarbons « (mmboe) |
17,180 | 17,523 | 17,996 | |||||||||
Of which: Equity-accounted entities b |
7,928 | 7,828 | 7,753 | |||||||||
Production a (net of royalties) |
||||||||||||
Liquids (mb/d) |
2,045 | 1,927 | 2,013 | |||||||||
Natural gas (mmcf/d) |
7,146 | 7,100 | 7,060 | |||||||||
Total hydrocarbons (mboe/d) |
3,277 | 3,151 | 3,230 | |||||||||
Of which: Subsidiaries « |
2,007 | 1,898 | 1,882 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
1,270 | 1,253 | 1,348 |
a | Because of rounding, some totals may not agree exactly with the sum of their component parts. |
b | Includes BPs share of Rosneft. See Rosneft on page 38 and Supplementary information on oil and natural gas on page 169 for further information. |
c | Includes BPs share of Rosneft. 2013 also includes BPs share of TNK-BP production. See Rosneft on page 38 and Oil and gas disclosures for the group on page 227 for further information. |
Total hydrocarbon proved reserves at 31 December 2015, on an oil equivalent basis including equity-accounted entities, decreased by 2% compared with 31 December 2014. The change includes a net increase from acquisitions and disposals of 130mmboe (103mmboe within our subsidiaries, 28mmboe within our equity-accounted entities). Acquisition activity in our subsidiaries occurred in Egypt, Trinidad, the US and the UK, and divestment activity in our subsidiaries occurred in Egypt, Trinidad, the US and the UK. In our equity-accounted entities the most significant item was a purchase in Russia.
Our total hydrocarbon production for the group was 4% higher compared with 2014. The increase comprised a 6% increase (13% increase for liquids and 2% decrease for gas) for subsidiaries and a 1% increase (1% decrease for liquids and 9% increase for gas) for equity-accounted entities.
See Oil and gas disclosures for the group on page 227. |
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 27 |
Our strategy is to have a balanced portfolio across the worlds key basins, working safely and reliably while maintaining a focus on capital discipline and quality execution to deliver value.
p
Operators work on board the floating production, storage and offloading vessel in the Plutão, Saturno, Vénus and Marte fields in Angola.
Our business model and strategy
The Upstream segment is responsible for our activities in oil and natural gas exploration, field development and production, as well as midstream transportation, storage and processing. We also market and trade natural gas, including liquefied natural gas, power and natural gas liquids. In 2015 our activities took place in 25 countries.
With the exception of our US Lower 48 onshore business, we deliver our exploration, development and production activities through five global technical and operating functions:
| The exploration function is responsible for renewing our resource base through access, exploration and appraisal, while the reservoir development function is responsible for the stewardship of our resource portfolio over the life of each field. |
| The global wells organization and the global projects organization are responsible for the safe, reliable and compliant execution of wells (drilling and completions) and major projects « . |
| The global operations organization is responsible for safe, reliable and compliant operations, including upstream production assets and midstream transportation and processing activities. |
We optimize and integrate the delivery of these activities across 12 regions, with support provided by global functions in specialist areas of expertise: technology, finance, procurement and supply chain, human resources and information technology.
The US Lower 48 began operating as a separate onshore business in 2015.
Technologies such as seismic imaging, enhanced oil recovery and big data analytics support our upstream strategy by helping us gain new access, increase recovery and reserves and improve production efficiency. See Our distinctive capabilities on page 16.
We actively manage our portfolio and place increasing emphasis on accessing, developing and producing from fields able to provide the greatest value (including those with the potential to make the highest contribution to our operating cash flow « ). We sell assets that we believe have more value to others. This allows us to focus our leadership, technical resources and organizational capability on
developing the resources we believe are likely to add the most value to our portfolio.
Our strategy is to have a balanced portfolio of material, enduring positions in the worlds key hydrocarbon basins; to employ capital and execute projects and other activities efficiently; and to operate safely and reliably in every basin to deliver increasing value.
Our strategy is enabled by:
| A continued focus on safety, reliability and the systematic management of risk. |
| Prioritizing value over volume, and a continuous focus on executional excellence, managing costs and business delivery. |
| Maintaining disciplined investment in a balanced portfolio of opportunities, in deep water, gas value chains, giant fields and unconventionals « . |
| Delivering competitive operating cash growth through improvements in efficiency and reliability for both operations and capital investment. |
| Strong relationships built on trust, mutual advantage and deep knowledge of the basins where we operate. |
Our performance summary
| For upstream safety performance see page 44. |
| We achieved an upstream BP-operated plant reliability « of 95%. |
| We started up three major upstream projects. |
| Our exploration function gained access to new potential resources covering almost 8,000km 2 in four countries. |
| Our divestments generated $0.8 billion in proceeds in 2015. |
Upstream profitability ($ billion)
Outlook for 2016
| We expect underlying production « to be broadly flat with 2015. The actual reported outcome will depend on the exact timing of project start-ups, divestments, OPEC quotas and entitlement impacts in our production-sharing agreements. |
| Capital investment is expected to decrease, largely reflecting our commitment to continued capital discipline and the rephasing and refocusing of our activities and major projects where appropriate in response to the current business environment. We will continue to manage our costs down using all levers available to us. These include continuing and expanding the simplification and efficiency efforts started in 2014, continuing to drive deflation into our third-party spend, influencing spend in our non-operated assets, and bringing headcount down to a level that reflects the size of our operations and the current environment. |
| Oil prices continue to be challenging in the near term. |
28 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Financial performance
$ million | ||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues a |
43,235 | 65,424 | 70,374 | |||||||||
RC profit before interest and tax |
(937 | ) | 8,934 | 16,657 | ||||||||
Net (favourable) unfavourable impact of non-operating items « and fair value accounting effects « |
2,130 | 6,267 | 1,608 | |||||||||
Underlying RC profit before interest and tax |
1,193 | 15,201 | 18,265 | |||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions |
17,082 | 19,772 | 19,115 | |||||||||
BP average realizations « b |
$ per barrel | |||||||||||
Crude oil c |
47.78 | 93.65 | 105.38 | |||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
20.75 | 36.15 | 38.38 | |||||||||
Liquids « |
45.63 | 87.96 | 99.24 | |||||||||
|
$ per thousand cubic feet |
|
||||||||||
Natural gas |
3.80 | 5.70 | 5.35 | |||||||||
US natural gas |
2.10 | 3.80 | 3.07 | |||||||||
$ per barrel of oil equivalent | ||||||||||||
Total hydrocarbons « |
34.78 | 60.85 | 63.58 | |||||||||
Average oil marker prices d |
|
$ per barrel |
|
|||||||||
Brent « |
52.39 | 98.95 | 108.66 | |||||||||
West Texas Intermediate |
48.71 | 93.28 | 97.99 | |||||||||
Average natural gas marker prices |
$ per million British thermal units | |||||||||||
Henry Hub gas price « e |
2.67 | 4.43 | 3.65 | |||||||||
pence per therm | ||||||||||||
UK National Balancing Point gas price « d |
42.61 | 50.01 | 67.99 |
a | Includes sales to other segments. |
b | Realizations are based on sales by consolidated subsidiaries « only, which excludes equity-accounted entities. |
c | Includes condensate and bitumen. |
d | All traded days average. |
e | Henry Hub First of Month Index. |
Market prices
Brent remains an integral marker to the production portfolio, from which a significant proportion of production is priced directly or indirectly. Certain regions use other local markers that are derived using differentials or a lagged impact from the Brent crude oil price.
Brent ($/bbl)
Henry Hub ($/mmBtu)
The dated Brent price in 2015 averaged $52.39 per barrel. Prices averaged about $58 during the first half of 2015, but fell sharply during the second half in the face of strong OPEC production growth and rising inventories. Brent prices ended the year near $35.
The Henry Hub First of Month Index price was down by 40%, year-on-year, in 2015 (2014, up by 21%).
The UK National Balancing Point gas price in 2015 fell by 15% compared with 2014 (2014 a decrease of 26% on 2013). This reflected ample supplies in Europe with robust Russian flows, higher LNG cargoes and rising indigenous production. Lower LNG prices in Asia led to a reduction in the price of transacted LNG available for Europe, which contributed to the weakness of European spot prices. For more information on the global energy market in 2015, see page 24.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 29 |
Financial results
Sales and other operating revenues for 2015 decreased compared with 2014, primarily reflecting significantly lower liquids and gas realizations and lower gas marketing and trading revenues partly offset by higher production. The decrease in 2014 compared with 2013 primarily reflected lower liquids realizations partially offset by higher production in higher-margin areas, higher gas realizations and higher gas marketing and trading revenues.
Replacement cost (RC) loss before interest and tax for the segment included a net non-operating charge of $2,235 million. This is primarily related to a net impairment charge associated with a number of assets, following a further fall in oil and gas prices and changes to other assumptions. See Financial statements Note 4 for further information. Fair value accounting effects had a favourable impact of $105 million relative to managements view of performance.
The 2014 result included a net non-operating charge of $6,298 million, primarily related to impairments associated with several assets, mainly in the North Sea and Angola reflecting the impact of the lower near-term price environment, revisions to reserves and increases in expected decommissioning cost estimates. Fair value accounting effects had a favourable impact of $31 million relative to managements view of performance. The 2013 result included a net non-operating charge of $1,364 million, which included an $845-million write-off attributable to block BM-CAL-13 offshore Brazil, as a result of the Pitanga exploration well not encountering commercial quantities of oil or gas, and an unfavourable impact of $244 million from fair value accounting effects.
After adjusting for non-operating items and fair value accounting effects, the decrease in the underlying RC profit before interest and tax compared with 2014 reflected significantly lower liquids and gas realizations, rig cancellation charges and lower gas marketing and trading results partly offset by lower costs including benefits from simplification and efficiency activities and lower exploration write-offs, and higher production.
Compared with 2013 the 2014 result reflected lower liquids realizations, higher costs, mainly depreciation, depletion and amortization and exploration write-offs and the absence of one-off benefits which occurred in 2013. This was partly offset by higher production in higher-margin areas, higher gas realizations and a benefit from stronger gas marketing and trading activities.
Total capital expenditure including acquisitions and asset exchanges in 2015 was lower compared with 2014. This included $100 million capital expenditure before closing adjustments in 2015 relating to the purchase of additional equity in the West Nile Delta concessions in Egypt and $81 million capital expenditure before closing adjustments relating to the purchase of additional equity in the Northeast Blanco and 32-9 concessions in the San Juan basin onshore US.
In total, disposal transactions generated $0.8 billion in proceeds in 2015, with a corresponding reduction in net proved reserves of 20mmboe within our subsidiaries.
The major disposal transaction during 2015 was the sale of our 36% interest in the Central Area Transmission System (CATS) business in the UK North Sea to Antin Infrastructure Partners. More information on disposals is provided in Upstream analysis by region on page 221 and Financial statements Note 4.
Exploration
The group explores for oil and natural gas under a wide range of licensing, joint arrangement « and other contractual agreements. We may do this alone or, more frequently, with partners.
In exploration we have reduced capital spending by 50% since 2014 with a focus on prioritizing near-term activity while creating options for longer-term renewal.
New access in 2015
We gained access to new potential resources covering almost 8,000km 2 in four countries (UK (North Sea), Egypt, the US, and Azerbaijan). We acquired a 20% participatory interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha, a Rosneft subsidiary that will further develop the Srednebotuobinskoye oil and gas condensate field in East Siberia, in November 2015. Related to this, Rosneft and BP will jointly undertake exploration in an adjacent area of mutual interest.
Rosneft and BP have also agreed to jointly explore two additional areas of mutual interest in the prolific West Siberian and Yenisey-Khatanga basins where they will jointly appraise the Baikalovskoye discovery subject to receipt of all relevant consents. This is in addition to the exploration agreement announced in 2014 for an area of mutual interest in the Volga-Urals region of Russia, where Rosneft and BP have commenced joint study work to assess potential non-shale, unconventional tight-oil « exploration prospects.
Exploration success
We participated in two potentially commercial discoveries in Egypt Atoll and Nooros in 2015.
Exploration and appraisal costs
Excluding lease acquisitions, the costs for exploration and appraisal were $1,794 million (2014 $2,911 million, 2013 $4,811 million). These costs included exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures, which were capitalized within intangible fixed assets, and geological and geophysical exploration costs, which were charged to income as incurred.
Approximately 26% of exploration and appraisal costs were directed towards appraisal activity. We participated in 29 gross (16.76 net) exploration and appraisal wells in six countries.
30 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Exploration expense
Total exploration expense of $2,353 million (2014 $3,632 million, 2013 $3,441 million) included the write-off of expenses related to unsuccessful drilling activities, lease expiration or uncertainties around development in Libya ($432 million), Angola ($471 million), the Gulf of Mexico ($581 million) and others ($345 million).
Reserves booking
Reserves booking from new discoveries will depend on the results of ongoing technical and commercial evaluations, including appraisal drilling. The segments total hydrocarbon reserves on an oil equivalent basis, including equity-accounted entities at 31 December 2015 decreased by 4% (a decrease of 5% for subsidiaries and an increase of less than 1% for equity-accounted entities) compared with reserves at 31 December 2014.
Proved reserves replacement ratio «
The proved reserves replacement ratio for the Upstream segment in 2015, excluding acquisitions and disposals, was 33% for subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (2014 31%), 28% for subsidiaries alone (2014 29%) and 76% for equity-accounted entities alone (2014 43%). For more information on proved reserves replacement for the group see page 227.
Upstream reserves
Estimated net proved reserves a (net of royalties)
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Liquids |
million barrels | |||||||||||
Crude oil b |
||||||||||||
Subsidiaries « |
3,560 | 3,582 | 3,798 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
694 | 702 | 729 | |||||||||
4,254 | 4,283 | 4,527 | ||||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
422 | 510 | 551 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
13 | 16 | 16 | |||||||||
435 | 526 | 567 | ||||||||||
Total liquids |
||||||||||||
Subsidiaries d |
3,982 | 4,092 | 4,349 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
707 | 717 | 745 | |||||||||
4,689 | 4,809 | 5,094 | ||||||||||
Natural gas |
billion cubic feet | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries e |
30,563 | 32,496 | 34,187 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
2,465 | 2,373 | 2,517 | |||||||||
33,027 | 34,869 | 36,704 | ||||||||||
Total hydrocarbons |
million barrels of oil equivalent | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
9,252 | 9,694 | 10,243 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
1,132 | 1,126 | 1,179 | |||||||||
10,384 | 10,821 | 11,422 |
a | Because of rounding, some totals may not agree exactly with the sum of their component parts. |
b | Includes condensate and bitumen which are not material. |
c | BPs share of reserves of equity-accounted entities in the Upstream segment. During 2015, upstream operations in Abu Dhabi, Argentina and Bolivia, as well as some of our operations in Angola and Indonesia, were conducted through equity-accounted entities. |
d | Includes 19 million barrels (21 million barrels at 31 December 2014 and 2013) in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad & Tobago LLC. |
e | Includes 2,359 billion cubic feet of natural gas (2,519 billion cubic feet at 31 December 2014 and 2,685 billion cubic feet at 31 December 2013) in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad & Tobago LLC. |
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 31 |
Developments
We achieved three major project start-ups in 2015: two in Angola and one in Australia. The In Salah Southern Fields project started up in February 2016. In addition to starting up major projects, we made good progress in projects in AGT (Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey), the North Sea, Oman and Egypt.
| Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey we signed agreements to become a shareholder in the Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline (TANAP), to transport gas from Shah Deniz to markets in Turkey, Greece, Bulgaria and Italy. |
| North Sea we continued to see high levels of activity, including further progress in the major redevelopment of Quad 204 and approval of the development plans for the Culzean field. We also completed the Magnus life extension project and installed the platform topsides at Clair Ridge. |
| Oman development of the Khazzan project continued, with 10 rigs in operation by the end of 2015. We also signed a heads of agreement with the government of the Sultanate of Oman to extend the licence area in February 2016. |
| Egypt we signed final agreements on the West Nile Delta project. We also increased our working interest in both West Nile Delta concessions. |
Subsidiaries development expenditure incurred, excluding midstream activities, was $13.5 billion (2014 $15.1 billion, 2013 $13.6 billion).
Production
Our oil and natural gas production assets are located onshore and offshore and include wells, gathering centres, in-field flow lines, processing facilities, storage facilities, offshore platforms, export systems (e.g. transit lines), pipelines and LNG plant facilities. These include production from conventional and unconventional (coalbed methane and shale) assets. The principal areas of production are Angola, Argentina, Australia, Azerbaijan, Egypt, Iraq, Trinidad, the UAE, the UK and the US.
With BP-operated plant reliability increasing from around 86% in 2011 to 95% in 2015, efficient delivery of turnarounds and strong infill drilling performance, we expect to keep the average managed base decline through 2016 at around 2% versus our 2014 baseline. Our long-term expectation for managed base decline remains at the 3-5% per annum level we have described in the past.
Production (net of royalties) a
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Liquids |
|
thousand barrels per day |
|
|||||||||
Crude oil b |
||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
971 | 844 | 789 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
165 | 163 | 294 | |||||||||
1,137 | 1,007 | 1,083 | ||||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
88 | 91 | 86 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
7 | 7 | 8 | |||||||||
95 | 99 | 94 | ||||||||||
Total liquids |
||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
1,060 | 936 | 874 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
172 | 170 | 302 | |||||||||
1,232 | 1,106 | 1,176 | ||||||||||
Natural gas |
million cubic feet per day | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
5,495 | 5,585 | 5,845 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
456 | 431 | 415 | |||||||||
5,951 | 6,016 | 6,259 | ||||||||||
Total hydrocarbons |
thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day | |||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
2,007 | 1,898 | 1,882 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities c |
251 | 245 | 374 | |||||||||
2,258 | 2,143 | 2,256 |
a | Because of rounding, some totals may not agree exactly with the sum of their component parts. |
b | Includes condensate and bitumen which are not material. |
c | Includes BPs share of production of equity-accounted entities in the Upstream segment. |
Our Upstream project pipeline | Key: Oil Gas |
*BP operated
Project | Location | Type | Project | Location | Type | |||||||||||
2015 start-ups
|
Expected start-ups 2017-2020
|
|||||||||||||||
Kizomba Satellites Phase 2 |
Angola | Deepwater |
Design and appraisal phase |
|||||||||||||
Greater Plutonio Phase 3* | Angola | Deepwater | Angelin | Trinidad | LNG | |||||||||||
Western Flank Phase A | Australia | LNG | Atoll | Egypt | Conventional | |||||||||||
Expected start-ups 2016-2020
|
B18 Platina* | Angola | Deepwater | |||||||||||||
Projects currently under construction |
Mad Dog Phase 2* | Gulf of Mexico | Deepwater | |||||||||||||
Angola LNG | Angola | LNG | Snadd* | North Sea | Conventional | |||||||||||
In Amenas compression | North Africa | Conventional | Tangguh expansion* | Asia Pacific | LNG | |||||||||||
In Salah Southern Fields a | North Africa | Conventional | Trinidad onshore compression | Trinidad | LNG | |||||||||||
Point Thomson | Alaska | Conventional | Trinidad offshore compression | Trinidad | LNG | |||||||||||
Quad 204* | North Sea | Conventional | Vorlich* | North Sea | Conventional | |||||||||||
Thunder Horse water injection* | Gulf of Mexico | Deepwater | ||||||||||||||
Clair Ridge* | North Sea | Conventional |
Beyond 2020
|
|||||||||||||
Juniper | Trinidad | LNG |
We have an additional 35-40 projects in the pipeline for post-2020 start-up.
Mix of resource types across conventional oil, deepwater oil, conventional gas and unconventionals.
Broad geographic reach.
Range of development types, from new to producing fields where we can use existing infrastructure. |
|||||||||||||
Oman Khazzan* | Middle East | Tight | ||||||||||||||
Persephone | Asia Pacific | LNG | ||||||||||||||
Thunder Horse South expansion* | Gulf of Mexico | Deepwater | ||||||||||||||
West Nile Delta Taurus/Libra* | Egypt | Conventional | ||||||||||||||
Culzean | North Sea | High pressure | ||||||||||||||
Shah Deniz Stage 2* | Azerbaijan | Conventional | ||||||||||||||
Taas-Yuryakh expansion | Russia | Conventional | ||||||||||||||
West Nile Delta Giza/ | Egypt | Conventional | ||||||||||||||
Fayoum/Raven* | ||||||||||||||||
Western Flank Phase B |
Australia | Conventional | a Started up in February 2016. |
32 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Our total hydrocarbon production for the segment in 2015 was 5.4% higher compared with 2014. The increase comprised a 5.7% increase (13.2% increase for liquids and 1.6% decrease for gas) for subsidiaries and a 2.4% increase (1.2% increase for liquids and 5.8% increase for gas) for equity-accounted entities compared with 2014. For more information on production see Oil and gas disclosures for the group on page 227.
In aggregate, underlying production was flat versus 2014.
The group and its equity-accounted entities have numerous long-term sales commitments in their various business activities, all of which are expected to be sourced from supplies available to the group that are not subject to priorities, curtailments or other restrictions. No single contract or group of related contracts is material to the group.
Gas marketing and trading activities
Our integrated supply and trading function markets and trades our own and third-party natural gas (including LNG), power and NGLs. This provides us with routes into liquid markets for the gas we produce and generates margins and fees from selling physical products and derivatives to third parties, together with income from asset optimization and trading. This means we have a single interface with gas trading markets and one consistent set of trading compliance and risk management processes, systems and controls.
Our upstream marketing and trading activity primarily takes place in the US, Canada and Europe and supports group LNG activities, managing market price risk and creating incremental trading opportunities through the use of commodity derivative contracts. It also enhances margins and generates fee income from sources such as the management of price risk on behalf of third-party customers.
Our trading financial risk governance framework is described in Financial statements Note 28 and the range of contracts used is described in Glossary commodity trading contracts on page 256.
Unlocking energy potential |
||||
BP has invested in Egypt for half a century. And in recent years, it has been a key location for BP discoveries. Our ongoing investment and exploration activities are helping to unlock energy potential in the area.
In March we made a gas discovery 6,400 metres below sea level in the North Damietta offshore area. We are working with the Egyptian government to accelerate the development of the Atoll discovery.
The discovery is in line to become our next major project in Egypt after completion of our West Nile Delta project.
|
|
Building a pipeline of future growth opportunities. |
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 33 |
We continued to improve our personal and process safety and delivered strong operations and marketing performance, contributing to record replacement cost profit before interest and tax.
p
The Cherry Point refinery processes crude oil sourced from Alaska, mid-continent US and Canada and has a capacity of 234,000 barrels per day.
Our business model and strategy
The Downstream segment has global manufacturing and marketing operations. It is the product and service-led arm of BP, made up of three businesses:
Fuels includes refineries, fuels marketing and convenience retail businesses, together with global oil supply and trading activities that make up our fuels value chains (FVCs). We sell refined petroleum products including gasoline, diesel and aviation fuel.
Lubricants manufactures and markets lubricants and related products and services globally, adding value through brand, technology and relationships, such as collaboration with original equipment manufacturing partners.
Petrochemicals manufactures, sells and distributes products, that are produced mainly using proprietary BP technology, and are then used by others to make essential consumer products such as paint, plastic bottles and textiles. We also license our technologies to third parties.
We aim to run safe and reliable operations across all our businesses, supported by leading brands and technologies, to deliver high-quality products and services that meet our customers needs.
Our strategy focuses on a quality portfolio that aims to lead the industry, as measured by net income per barrel « , with improving returns and growing operating cash flow « . Our five strategic priorities are:
Safe and reliable operations this remains our first priority and we continue to drive improvement in personal and process safety performance.
Advantaged manufacturing we continue to build a top-quartile refining business by having a competitively advantaged portfolio underpinned by operational excellence that helps to reduce exposure to margin volatility. In petrochemicals we seek to sustainably improve earnings potential and make the business more resilient to a bottom of cycle environment through portfolio repositioning, improved operational performance and efficiency benefits. |
| Fuels and lubricants marketing we invest in higher-returning businesses with reliable cash flows and growth potential. |
| Portfolio quality we maintain our focus on quality by high-grading of assets combined with capital discipline. |
| Simplification and efficiency we are embedding a culture of simplification and efficiency to support performance improvement and make our businesses even more competitive. |
Disciplined execution of our strategy is helping improve our underlying performance and create a more resilient business that is better able to withstand external environmental impacts. This is with the aim of ensuring Downstream remains a reliable source of cash flow for BP.
Our performance summary
| For Downstream safety performance see page 45. |
| We have delivered record replacement cost profit before interest and tax « and pre-tax returns « this year, demonstrating that we are creating a more resilient Downstream business. |
| We delivered strong availability and operational performance across our refining portfolio and year-on-year improvement in utilization. |
| We commenced the European launch of our BP fuels with ACTIVE technology in Spain, which are designed to remove dirt and protect car engines. |
| We announced the agreement to restructure our German refining joint operation « with Rosneft. |
| We halted operations at Bulwer refinery in Australia. |
| In Air BP we completed the integration of Statoil Fuel and Retails aviation business which added more than 70 airports to our global network. |
| In our lubricants business we launched Castrols Nexcel , an innovative automotive oil-change technology. |
| We completed start-up of the Zhuhai 3 plant in China the worlds largest single train purified terephthalic acid (PTA) unit. |
| Our simplification and efficiency programmes contributed to material progress in lowering cash costs « . These programmes include right-sizing the Downstream organization, implementing site-by-site improvement plans to deliver manufacturing efficiency in refining and petrochemicals, and focusing on third-party costs. |
Downstream profitability ($ billion)
See Financial performance on page 35 for the main factors influencing downstream profit.
Outlook for 2016
| We anticipate a weaker refining environment. |
| We expect the financial impact of refinery turnarounds to be higher than 2015 as a result of increased turnaround activity. |
34 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Financial performance
$ million | ||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Sale of crude oil through spot and term contracts |
38,386 | 80,003 | 79,394 | |||||||||
Marketing, spot and term sales of refined products |
148,925 | 227,082 | 258,015 | |||||||||
Other sales and operating revenues |
13,258 | 16,401 | 13,786 | |||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues a |
200,569 | 323,486 | 351,195 | |||||||||
RC profit (loss) before interest and tax b |
||||||||||||
Fuels |
5,858 | 2,830 | 1,518 | |||||||||
Lubricants |
1,241 | 1,407 | 1,274 | |||||||||
Petrochemicals |
12 | (499 | ) | 127 | ||||||||
7,111 | 3,738 | 2,919 | ||||||||||
Net (favourable) unfavourable impact of non-operating items « and fair value accounting effects « |
||||||||||||
Fuels |
137 | 389 | 712 | |||||||||
Lubricants |
143 | (136 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||
Petrochemicals |
154 | 450 | 3 | |||||||||
434 | 703 | 713 | ||||||||||
Underlying RC profit (loss) before interest and tax b |
||||||||||||
Fuels |
5,995 | 3,219 | 2,230 | |||||||||
Lubricants |
1,384 | 1,271 | 1,272 | |||||||||
Petrochemicals |
166 | (49 | ) | 130 | ||||||||
7,545 | 4,441 | 3,632 | ||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions |
2,109 | 3,106 | 4,506 |
a | Includes sales to other segments. |
b | Income from petrochemicals produced at our Gelsenkirchen and Mülheim sites is reported within the fuels business. Segment-level overhead expenses are included within the fuels business. |
Financial results
Sales and other operating revenues in 2015 were lower compared with 2014 due to lower crude prices. Similarly, the decrease in 2014, compared with 2013 primarily was due to falling crude prices.
Replacement cost (RC) profit before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2015 included a net operating charge of $590 million, mainly relating to restructuring charges. The 2014 result included a net non-operating charge of $1,570 million, primarily relating to impairment charges in our petrochemicals and fuels businesses, while the 2013 result included impairment charges in our fuels business, which were mainly associated with our disposal programme. In addition, fair value accounting effects had a favourable impact of $156 million, compared with a favourable impact of $867 million in 2014 and an unfavourable impact of $178 million in 2013.
After adjusting for non-operating items and fair value accounting effects, underlying RC profit before interest and tax of $7,545 million in 2015 was a record for Downstream.
Our fuels business
The fuels strategy focuses primarily on fuels value chains (FVCs). This includes building a top-quartile and focused refining business through operating reliability, feedstock and location advantage and efficiency improvements to our already competitively advantaged portfolio.
We believe that having a quality refining portfolio connected to strong marketing positions is core to our integrated FVC businesses as this provides optimization opportunities in highly competitive markets.
In January 2016 we announced that we signed definitive agreements to dissolve our German refining joint operation with our partner Rosneft. The restructuring will refocus our refining business in the heart of Europe and is in line with our drive for greater simplification and efficiency.
We continue to grow our fuels marketing businesses, including retail, through differentiated marketing offers and key partnerships. We partner with leading retailers, creating distinctive offers that aim to deliver good returns and reliable profit and cash generation (see page 13).
Underlying RC profit before interest and tax was higher compared with 2014 reflecting a strong refining environment, improved refining margin optimization and operations, and lower costs from simplification and efficiency programmes. Compared with 2013, the 2014 result was higher, mainly due to improved fuels marketing performance, increased heavy crude processing and higher production, mainly as a result of the ramp-up of operations at our Whiting refinery following the modernization project. This was partially offset by a weaker refining environment.
Refining marker margin «
We track the margin environment by a global refining marker margin (RMM). Refining margins are a measure of the difference between the price a refinery pays for its inputs (crude oil) and the market price of its products. Although refineries produce a variety of petroleum products, we track the margin environment using a simplified indicator that reflects the margins achieved on gasoline and diesel only. The RMM may not be representative of the margin achieved by BP in any period because of BPs particular refinery configurations and crude and product slates. In addition, the RMM does not include estimates of energy or other variable costs.
$ per barrel | ||||||||||||||
Region | Crude marker | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
US North West |
Alaska North | |||||||||||||
Slope |
24.0 | 16.6 | 15.2 | |||||||||||
US Midwest |
West Texas | |||||||||||||
Intermediate |
19.0 | 17.4 | 21.7 | |||||||||||
Northwest Europe |
Brent « |
14.5 | 12.5 | 12.9 | ||||||||||
Mediterranean |
Azeri Light |
12.7 | 10.6 | 10.5 | ||||||||||
Australia |
Brent | 15.4 | 13.5 | 13.4 | ||||||||||
BP RMM |
17.0 | 14.4 | 15.4 |
BP refining marker margin ($/bbl)
The average global RMM in 2015 was $17.0/bbl, $2.6/bbl higher than in 2014, and the second highest on record (after 2012). The increase was driven by higher margins on gasoline as a result of increased demand in a low oil price environment and persistent refinery outages in the US.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 35 |
Refining
At 31 December 2015 we owned or had a share in 13 refineries producing refined petroleum products that we supply to retail and commercial customers. For a summary of our interests in refineries and average daily crude distillation capacities see page 225.
In 2015, refinery operations were strong, with Solomon refining availability « sustained at around 95% and utilization rates of 91% for the year. Overall refinery throughputs in 2015 were flat compared to 2014, with reduced throughput from ceasing refining operations at Bulwer refinery, offset by increased throughput at the Whiting and Kwinana refineries.
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Refinery throughputs a | thousand barrels per day | |||||||||||
US b |
657 | 642 | 726 | |||||||||
Europe |
794 | 782 | 766 | |||||||||
Rest of world b |
254 | 297 | 299 | |||||||||
Total |
1,705 | 1,721 | 1,791 | |||||||||
% | ||||||||||||
Refining availability |
94.7 | 94.9 | 95.3 | |||||||||
Sales volumes |
thousand barrels per day | |||||||||||
Marketing sales c |
2,835 | 2,872 | 3,084 | |||||||||
Trading/supply sales d |
2,770 | 2,448 | 2,485 | |||||||||
Total refined product sales |
5,605 | 5,320 | 5,569 | |||||||||
Crude oil e |
2,098 | 2,360 | 2,142 | |||||||||
Total |
7,703 | 7,680 | 7,711 |
a | Refinery throughputs reflect crude oil and other feedstock volumes. |
b | Bulwer refinery in Australia ceased refining operations in 2015. The Texas City and Carson refineries in the US were both divested in 2013. |
c | Marketing sales include sales to service stations, end-consumers, bulk buyers and jobbers (i.e. third parties who own networks of a number of service stations) and small resellers. |
d | Trading/supply sales are sales to large unbranded resellers and other oil companies. |
e | Crude oil sales relate to transactions executed by our integrated supply and trading function, primarily for optimizing crude oil supplies to our refineries and in other trading. 87,000 barrels per day relate to revenues reported by the Upstream segment. |
Logistics and marketing
Downstream of our refineries, we operate an advantaged infrastructure and logistics network that includes pipelines, storage terminals and tankers for road and rail. We seek to drive excellence in operational and transactional processes and deliver compelling customer offers in the various markets where we operate. In early 2016 we agreed the disposal of our Amsterdam oil terminal. We also announced our intention to enter into joint ventures « on certain midstream assets in North America and Australia to increase our competitiveness and enable growth in these regions.
We supply fuel and related retail services to consumers through company-owned and franchised retail sites, as well as other channels, including dealers and jobbers. We also supply commercial customers within the transport and industrial sectors.
Number of retail sites operated under a BP brand | ||||||||||||
Retail sites f |
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||
US |
7,000 | 7,100 | 7,700 | |||||||||
Europe |
8,100 | 8,000 | 8,000 | |||||||||
Rest of world |
2,100 | 2,100 | 2,100 | |||||||||
Total |
17,200 | 17,200 | 17,800 |
f | Reported to the nearest 100. Includes sites not operated by BP but instead operated by dealers, jobbers, franchisees or brand licensees under a BP brand. These may move to or from the BP brand as their fuel supply or brand licence agreements expire and are renegotiated in the normal course of business. Retail sites are primarily branded BP, ARCO and Aral. Excludes our interests in equity-accounted entities that are dual-branded. |
Retail is the most material element of our fuels marketing operations and has good exposure to growth markets. In addition we have distinctive partnerships with leading retailers in six countries and plan to expand elsewhere. Retail is a significant source of growth today and is expected to be so in the future. This year we began rolling out our new BP fuels with ACTIVE technology in Spain and we plan to continue this roll-out in additional markets in 2016.
Supply and trading
Our integrated supply and trading function is responsible for delivering value across the overall crude and oil products supply chain. This structure enables our downstream businesses to maintain a single interface with oil trading markets and operate with one set of trading compliance and risk management processes, systems and controls. It has a two-fold purpose:
36 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
First, it seeks to identify the best markets and prices for our crude oil, source optimal raw materials for our refineries and provide competitive supply for our marketing businesses. We will often sell our own crude and purchase alternative crudes from third parties for our refineries where this will provide incremental margin.
Second, it aims to create and capture incremental trading opportunities by entering into a full range of exchange-traded commodity derivatives, over-the-counter contracts and spot and term contracts. In combination with rights to access storage and transportation capacity, this allows it to access advantageous price differences between locations and time periods, and to arbitrage between markets.
The function has trading offices in Europe, North America and Asia. Our presence in the more actively traded regions of the global oil markets supports overall understanding of the supply and demand forces across these markets.
Our trading financial risk governance framework is described in Financial statements Note 28 and the range of contracts used is described in Glossary commodity trading contracts on page 256.
Aviation
Air BPs strategic aim is to continue to hold strong positions in our core locations of Europe and the US, while expanding our portfolio in airports that offer long-term competitive advantage in material growing markets such as Asia and South America. We are one of the worlds largest global aviation fuels suppliers. Air BP serves many major commercial airlines as well as the general aviation sectors. We have marketing sales of more than 430,000 barrels per day and we added more than 70 airports to our global network with the acquisition of Statoil Fuel & Retails aviation business.
Our lubricants business
Our lubricants strategy is to focus on our premium brands and growth markets while leveraging technology and customer relationships. With more than 50% of profit generated from growth markets and continued growth in premium lubricants, we have an excellent base for further expansion and sustained profit growth.
Our lubricants business manufactures and markets lubricants and related products and services to the automotive, industrial, marine and energy markets across the world. Our key brands are Castrol, BP and Aral. Castrol is a recognized brand worldwide that we believe provides us with significant competitive advantage. In technology, we apply our expertise to create differentiated, premium lubricants and high-performance fluids for customers in on-road, off-road, sea and industrial applications globally.
We are one of the largest purchasers of base oil in the market, but have chosen not to produce it or manufacture additives at scale. Our participation choices in the value chain are focused on areas where we can leverage competitive differentiation and strength, such as:
| Applying cutting-edge technologies in the development and formulation of advanced products. |
| Creating and developing product brands and clearly communicating their benefits to customers. |
| Building and extending our relationships with customers to better understand and meet their needs. |
The lubricants business delivered an underlying RC profit before interest and tax which was higher than 2014 and 2013. The 2015 result reflected strong performance in growth markets and premium brands and lower costs from simplification and efficiency programmes. These factors contributed to around a 20% year-on-year improvement in results, which was partially offset by adverse foreign exchange impacts. The 2014 result benefited from improved margins across the portfolio, offset by adverse foreign exchange impacts.
Our petrochemicals business
Our petrochemicals strategy is to improve our earnings potential and make the business more resilient to a bottom-of-cycle environment. We develop proprietary technology to deliver leading cost positions compared with our competition. We manufacture and market four main product lines:
| Purified terephthalic acid (PTA). |
| Paraxylene (PX). |
| Acetic acid. |
| Olefins and derivatives. |
We also produce a number of other specialty petrochemicals products.
We aim to reposition our portfolio, improve operating performance and create efficiency benefits. We are taking steps to significantly improve the resilience of the business to a bottom-of-cycle environment by:
| Restructuring a significant portion of our portfolio, primarily in our aromatics business, to shut down older capacity in the US and Asia and assess disposal options for less advantaged assets. |
| Retrofitting our best technology in our advantaged sites to reduce overall operating costs. |
| Growing third-party licensing income to create additional value. |
| Delivering operational improvements focused on turnaround efficiency and improved reliability. |
| Delivering value through simplification and efficiency programmes. |
In addition to the assets we own and operate, we have also invested in a number of joint arrangements « in Asia, where our partners are leading companies in their domestic market. We are licensing our distinctive technologies, including recently announced licensing agreements for our latest generation PTA technology in Oman and China.
In 2015 the petrochemicals business delivered a higher underlying RC profit before interest and tax compared with 2014 and 2013. The result reflected improved operational performance and benefits from our simplification and efficiency programmes leading to lower costs. Compared with 2013, the 2014 result was lower, reflecting a continuation of the weak margin environment, particularly in the Asian aromatics sector, and unplanned operational events.
Our petrochemicals production of 14.8 million tonnes in 2015 was higher than 2014 and 2013 (2014 14.0mmte, 2013 13.9mmte), with the low margin environment in 2014 and 2013 driving reduced output.
In 2015, our Zhuhai 3 PTA plant in China was fully commissioned adding 1.25 million tonnes of production capacity to our petrochemicals portfolio. During the year we also shut down older capacity of certain units in the US and Asia.
We are upgrading our PTA plants at Cooper River in South Carolina, US and Geel in Belgium using our latest proprietary technology. We expect these investments to significantly increase manufacturing efficiency at these facilities. We plan to continue deploying our technology in new asset platforms to access Asian demand and advantaged feedstock sources.
We announced in January 2016 that we had reached an agreement to sell our Decatur petrochemicals complex in Alabama, US, as part of our strategy to refocus our global petrochemicals business for long-term growth.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 37 |
Rosneft is the largest oil company in Russia, with a strong portfolio of existing and future opportunities.
p
Taas-Yuryakh central processing facility at the Srednebotuobinskoye oil and gas field during the Siberian winter.
BP and Rosneft
BPs 19.75% shareholding in Rosneft allows us to benefit from a diversified set of existing and potential projects in the Russian oil and gas sector.
Russia has significant hydrocarbon resources and will continue to play an important role in long-term energy supply to the global economy.
BP is positioned to contribute to Rosnefts strategy implementation through collaboration on technology and best practice.
We have the potential to undertake standalone projects with Rosneft, both in Russia and internationally.
We remain committed to our strategic investment in Rosneft, while complying with all relevant sanctions.
2015 summary
In the current environment Rosneft continues to deliver solid operational and financial performance, demonstrating the resilience of its business model.
BP received $271 million, net of withholding taxes, in July representing our share of Rosnefts dividend of 8.21 Russian roubles per share for 2014.
In 2015 Rosneft met all its debt service obligations and increased total hydrocarbon production by 1%.
Bob Dudley serves on the Rosneft Board of Directors, and its Strategic Planning Committee.
A second BP nominee, Guillermo Quintero, was elected to Rosnefts Board of Directors at Rosnefts annual general meeting in June 2015 and was subsequently elected to its HR and Remuneration Committee.
US and EU sanctions remain in place on certain Russian activities, individuals and entities, including Rosneft.
|
Upstream
Rosneft is the largest oil company in Russia and the largest publicly traded oil company in the world, based on hydrocarbon production volume. Rosneft has a major resource base of hydrocarbons onshore and offshore, with assets in all key hydrocarbon regions of Russia: West Siberia, East Siberia, Timan-Pechora, Volga-Urals, North Caucasus, the continental shelf of the Arctic Sea, and the Far East.
BP purchased a 20% participatory interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha, a Rosneft subsidiary that will further develop the Srednebotuobinskoye oil and gas condensate field in East Siberia. Related to this, Rosneft and BP will jointly undertake exploration in an adjacent area of mutual interest. BPs interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha is reported in the Upstream segment.
Rosneft and BP have also agreed to jointly explore two additional areas of mutual interest in the prolific West Siberian and Yenisey-Khatanga basins, where they will jointly appraise the Baikalovskoye discovery subject to receipt of all relevant consents. This is in addition to the exploration agreement announced in 2014 for an area of mutual interest in the Volga-Urals region of Russia, where Rosneft and BP have commenced joint study work to assess potential non-shale, unconventional tight-oil « exploration prospects.
Rosneft participates in international exploration projects or has operations in countries including the US, Canada, Vietnam, Venezuela, Brazil, Algeria, United Arab Emirates, Turkmenistan and Norway.
Rosneft continued to optimize its budget and to focus on new upstream projects, including the development of the Labaganskoye, Suzun and East Messoyakha fields. It also signed preliminary contracts for the Russkoye, Kuyumba, Yurubcheno-Tokhomskoye and East Messoyakha fields to deliver oil to the Transneft pipeline system.
Rosnefts estimated hydrocarbon production reached an annual record in 2015. This was due to a ramp-up in drilling, optimization of well performance and the application of modern technologies such as multistage fracturing, dual completion and bottomhole treatment. In 2015 estimated gas production increased by around 10% compared with 2014, primarily driven by greenfield start-ups and commissioning of new wells.
Downstream
Rosneft is the leading Russian refining company based on throughputs. It owns and operates 10 refineries in Russia. Rosneft continued to implement the modernization programme for its Russian refineries in 2015 to significantly upgrade and expand refining capacity.
As at 31 December 2015, Rosneft owned and operated more than 2,500 retail service stations in Russia and abroad. This includes BP-branded sites acquired as part of the TNK-BP acquisition in 2013 that, under a licence agreement with BP, continue to operate under the BP brand. Downstream operations also include jet fuel, bunkering, bitumen and lubricants.
On 15 January 2016 BP and Rosneft announced that they had signed definitive agreements to dissolve the German refining joint operation « Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG). The restructuring, which is expected to be completed in 2016, will result in Rosneft taking ownership of ROGs interests in the Bayernoil, MiRO Karlsruhe and PCK Schwedt refineries. In exchange, BP will take sole ownership of the Gelsenkirchen refinery and the solvent production facility DHC Solvent Chemie.
Rosneft refinery throughputs in 2015 amounted to 1,966mb/d (2014 2,027mb/d, 2013 1,818mb/d).
38 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Rosneft segment performance
BPs investment in Rosneft is managed and reported as a separate segment under IFRS. The segment result includes equity-accounted earnings, representing BPs 19.75% share of the profit or loss of Rosneft, as adjusted for the accounting required under IFRS relating to BPs purchase of its interest in Rosneft and the amortization of the deferred gain relating to the disposal of BPs interest in TNK-BP. See Financial statements Note 16 for further information.
$ million | ||||||||||||
2015 a | 2014 | 2013 | b | |||||||||
Profit before interest and tax c d |
1,314 | 2,076 | 2,053 | |||||||||
Inventory holding (gains) losses « |
(4 | ) | 24 | 100 | ||||||||
RC profit before interest and tax |
1,310 | 2,100 | 2,153 | |||||||||
Net charge (credit) for non-operating items « |
| (225 | ) | 45 | ||||||||
Underlying RC profit before interest and tax « |
1,310 | 1,875 | 2,198 | |||||||||
Average oil marker prices | $ per barrel | |||||||||||
Urals (Northwest Europe CIF) |
50.97 | 97.23 | 107.38 |
a | The operational and financial information of the Rosneft segment for 2015 is based on preliminary operational and financial results of Rosneft for the three months ended 31 December 2015. Actual results may differ from these amounts. |
b | From 21 March 2013. |
c | BPs share of Rosnefts earnings after finance costs, taxation and non-controlling interests is included in the BP group income statement within profit before interest and taxation. |
d | Includes $16 million (2014 $25 million, 2013 $5 million) of foreign exchange losses arising on the dividend received. |
Market price
The price of Urals delivered in North West European (Rotterdam) averaged $50.97/bbl in 2015, $1.42/bbl below dated Brent « . The differential to Brent narrowed marginally from -$1.72/bbl in 2014 as stronger demand from European refineries offset the impact of increased supplies of competing medium sour crude from the Middle East.
Financial results
Replacement cost (RC) profit before interest and tax for the segment for the year ended 31 December 2015 did not include any non-operating items, whereas the 2014 result included a non-operating gain of $225 million, relating to Rosnefts sale of its interest in the Yugragazpererabotka joint venture « .
After adjusting for non-operating items, the decrease in the underlying RC profit before interest and tax compared with 2014 reflected lower oil prices, foreign exchange, and comparatively favourable duty lag effects. The rouble weakened against the US dollar during 2015. This impacts both Rosnefts earnings in roubles and BPs share of the Rosneft result when it is translated to US dollars. Compared with 2013, the 2014 result was affected by an unfavourable duty lag effect, lower oil prices and other items, partially offset by certain foreign exchange effects which had a favourable impact on the result. See also Financial statements Notes 16 and 31 for other foreign exchange effects.
p
Rosnefts operations in West Siberia.
Balance sheet
|
||||||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Investments in associates
«
e
|
5,797 | 7,312 | 13,681 | |||||||||
Production and reserves | ||||||||||||
2015 a | 2014 | 2013 f | ||||||||||
Production (net of royalties)
|
||||||||||||
Liquids « (mb/d) |
||||||||||||
Crude oil g |
809 | 816 | 643 | |||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
4 | 5 | 7 | |||||||||
Total liquids |
813 | 821 | 650 | |||||||||
Natural gas (mmcf/d) |
1,195 | 1,084 | 617 | |||||||||
Total hydrocarbons « (mboe/d) |
1,019 | 1,008 | 756 | |||||||||
Estimated net proved reserves
h
|
|
|||||||||||
Liquids (million barrels) |
||||||||||||
Crude oil g |
4,823 | 4,961 | 4,860 | |||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
47 | 47 | 115 | |||||||||
Total liquids i |
4,871 | 5,007 | 4,975 | |||||||||
Natural gas j (billion cubic feet) |
11,169 | 9,827 | 9,271 | |||||||||
Total hydrocarbons (mmboe) |
6,796 | 6,702 | 6,574 |
e | See Financial statements Note 16 for further information. |
f | 2013 reflects production for the period 21 March to 31 December, averaged over the full year. Information on BPs share of TNK-BPs production for comparative periods is provided on pages 230 and 231. |
g | Includes condensate. |
h | Because of rounding, some totals may not agree exactly with the sum of their component parts. |
i | Includes 70 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 1.27% non-controlling interest in Rosneft held assets in Russia including 28 million barrels held through BPs equity-accounted interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha. |
j | Includes 129 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 0.23% non-controlling interest in Rosneft held assets in Russia including 5 billion cubic feet held through BPs equity-accounted interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha. |
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 39 |
and corporate
Comprises our renewables business, shipping, treasury and corporate activities including centralized functions.
p
At our Tropical BioEnergia plant in Brazil we process sugar cane to produce biofuels.
Financial performance
$ million | ||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues a |
2,048 | 1,989 | 1,805 | |||||||||
RC profit (loss) before interest and tax |
(1,768 | ) | (2,010 | ) | (2,319 | ) | ||||||
Net (favourable) unfavourable impact of non-operating items « |
547 | 670 | 421 | |||||||||
Underlying RC profit (loss) before interest and tax « |
(1,221 | ) | (1,340 | ) | (1,898 | ) | ||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions |
340 | 903 | 1,050 |
a | Includes sales to other segments. |
The replacement cost (RC) loss before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2015 was $1.8 billion (2014 $2.0 billion, 2013 $2.3 billion). The 2015 result included a net charge for non-operating items of $547 million (2014 $670 million, 2013 $421 million).
After adjusting for these non-operating items, the underlying RC loss before interest and tax for the year ended 31 December 2015 was $1.2 billion, similar to prior year (2014 $1.3 billion, 2013 $1.9 billion).
BP has the largest operated renewables business among our oil and gas peers. Our activities are focused on biofuels and onshore wind.
Biofuels business model and strategy
Biofuels can be blended into traditional transport fuels without significant engine modifications to existing fuel-delivery systems. BP is working to produce biofuels that are low cost, low carbon, scalable and competitive without subsidies.
Our main activity is in Brazil, where we operate three sugar cane mills producing bioethanol and sugar, and exporting power made from sugar cane waste to the local grid. We use our expertise and technology capabilities to drive continuing improvements in operational efficiency. Our strategy is enabled by:
| Safe and reliable operations continuing to drive improvements in personal, process and transport safety. |
| Competitive sourcing concentrating our efforts in Brazil, which has one of the most cost-competitive biofuel feedstocks currently available in the world. |
| Low carbon producing bioethanol supported by low-carbon power generated from burning sugar cane waste. These processes reduce life-cycle GHG emissions by around 70% compared with gasoline. |
| Domestic and international markets selling bioethanol domestically in Brazil and also to international markets such as the US and Europe through our integrated supply and trading function. |
We are also investing in the development and commercialization of biobutanol, in conjunction with our partner DuPont. Compared with other biofuels, biobutanol has the potential to be blended with fuels in higher proportions, and be easier to transport, store and manage. We are also investigating a number of chemical applications for this advanced biofuel.
Our performance summary
| We have reduced our recordable injury frequency by more than 60% since the acquisition of Companhia Nacional de Açúcar e Álcool in 2011. For more information, see Safety on page 45. |
| We increased our production of ethanol equivalent by 47% compared with 2014 and generated 677GWh of power for Brazils national grid. |
| We divested our interest in Vivergo Fuels a UK-based joint venture « producing bioethanol from wheat in May 2015. |
| We are improving our agricultural operational performance with a 36% increase in cane harvester efficiency relative to 2014, and in 2015, we farmed a total planted area of 127,000 hectares. |
BP Brazil biofuels production
(million litres of ethanol equivalent)
Wind
We are among the top wind energy producers in the US. Our focus is on safe operations and optimizing performance.
BP holds interests in 16 onshore wind farms in the US, and BP is the operator of 14 of these. Our net generating capacity « from this portfolio, based on our financial stake, was 1,556 megawatts (MW) of electricity at 31 December 2015.
40 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
BP also runs two wind farms in our refinery sites in the Netherlands, operating on a much smaller scale and managed by our Downstream segment, with 32MW of generating capacity.
Our net share of wind generation for 2015 was 4,424GWh, compared with 4,617GWh a year ago. Lower power generation was primarily a result of less windy weather across the US in 2015.
|
||
See our Sustainability Report or bp.com/renewables for additional information on our renewable energy activities. | ||
Shipping
The primary purpose of BPs shipping and chartering activities is the safe transportation of the groups hydrocarbon products using a combination of BP-operated, time-chartered and spot-chartered vessels. Surplus capacity may also be used to transport third-party products. All vessels conducting BP shipping activities are subject to our health, safety, security and environmental requirements. At 31 December 2015, our fleet included four vessels supporting operations in Alaska, 44 BP-operated and 40 time-chartered vessels for our deep-sea, international oil and gas shipping operations. In addition 28 deep-sea oil tankers and six LNG tankers are on order and planned for delivery into the BP-operated fleet between 2016 and 2019. The first of these new vessels, the British Respect oil tanker, was formally named at a ceremony in November.
Treasury
Treasury manages the financing of the group centrally, with responsibility for managing the groups debt profile, share buyback programmes and dividend payments, while ensuring liquidity is sufficient to meet group requirements. It also manages key financial risks including interest rate, foreign exchange, pension and financial institution credit risk. From locations in the UK, US and Singapore, treasury provides the interface between BP and the international financial markets and supports the financing of BPs projects around the world. Treasury trades foreign exchange and interest-rate products in the financial markets, hedging group exposures and generating incremental value through optimizing and managing cash flows and the short-term investment of operational cash balances. Trading activities are underpinned by the compliance, control and risk management infrastructure common to all BP trading activities. For further information, see Financial statements Note 28.
Insurance
The group generally restricts its purchase of insurance to situations where this is required for legal or contractual reasons. Some risks are insured with third parties and reinsured by group insurance companies. This approach is reviewed on a regular basis and if specific circumstances require such a review.
Outlook
Other businesses and corporate annual charges, excluding non-operating items, are expected to be around $1.2 billion in 2016.
p
BP shipping reached a centenary of maritime achievement in April 2015.
BP reached agreements resolving the largest remaining liabilities.
p
Shrimpers off the coast of Grand Isle in Louisiana.
Key events
| BP reached agreements in principle with the United States federal government and five Gulf states in July to settle all federal and state claims arising from the Deepwater Horizon accident and oil spill (the incident). In addition, BP also settled the vast majority of claims made by local government entities. |
| The United States lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the district court in October to resolve all United States and Gulf states natural resource damage claims and all Clean Water Act penalty claims. At the same time, BP entered a Settlement Agreement with the Gulf states for economic, property and other losses. |
| The proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement are conditional on each other and neither will become effective unless the court provides final approval of the Consent Decree. |
| The final submission deadline for claims under the 2012 Plaintiffs Steering Committee settlements was 8 June 2015. |
| By the end of 2015, the cumulative pre-tax income statement charge as a result of the incident amounted to $55.5 billion. This excludes amounts that BP does not consider possible to measure reliably at this time. |
Federal and state settlements
On 2 July 2015 BP announced that BP Exploration & Production Inc. (BPXP) had reached agreements in principle to settle all federal and state claims arising from the incident. The United States is expected to file a motion with the court to enter the Consent Decree as a final settlement around the end of March, which the court will then consider. Subject to final court approval, payments under the terms of the agreements will be made at a rate of around $1.1 billion a year for the majority of the 18-year payment period.
See Legal proceedings on page 237 for further details including a summary of what is not covered by the proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement. For additional details on the financial impacts see Financial statements Note 2.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 41 |
Plaintiffs Steering Committee settlements
The Plaintiffs Steering Committee (PSC) was established to act on behalf of individual and business plaintiffs in the multi-district litigation proceedings in federal court in New Orleans (MDL 2179). In 2012 BP reached settlements to resolve the substantial majority of legitimate individual and business claims and medical claims stemming from the incident. Approximately $2.3 billion was paid out under the PSC settlements during 2015. Claims continue to be assessed and paid.
The medical benefits class action settlement provides for claims to be paid to qualifying class members. The deadline for submitting claims under the settlement was 12 February 2015.
Securities litigation and other legal proceedings
The multi-district litigation proceedings pending in federal court in Houston (MDL 2185), including a purported class action on behalf of purchasers of American depositary shares under US federal securities law, are continuing. A jury trial is scheduled to begin in July 2016.
In MDL 2179, claims by individuals and businesses that opted out of the PSC settlements or whose claims were excluded from them, including claims for recovery of losses allegedly resulting from the 2010 federal deepwater drilling moratoria and the related permitting processes, are continuing.
BP is subject to additional legal proceedings in connection with the incident. For more information see Legal proceedings on page 237.
Environmental restoration
In April 2011 BP committed to provide $1 billion in early restoration funding to expedite recovery of natural resources injured as a result of the incident. By the end of 2015 BP had provided approximately $762 million to support restoration projects, with the remaining $238 million expected to be funded in 2016. The federal and state settlements referred to above include more than $7 billion to resolve all natural resource damage claims, which is in addition to this $1 billion.
In May 2010 BP committed $500 million over 10 years to fund independent scientific research through the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative. BP had contributed $278 million to the programme by the end of 2015.
See bp.com/gulfofmexico for further information on environmental and economic restoration.
Process safety and ethics monitors
Two independent monitors an ethics monitor and a process safety monitor were appointed under the terms of the criminal plea agreement BP reached with the US government in 2012. Under the terms of the agreement, BP is taking additional actions to further enhance ethics and compliance and the safety of its drilling operations in the Gulf of Mexico.
The ethics monitor delivered an initial report early in 2015. He delivered a second report later in the year under a separate administrative agreement with the US Environmental Protection Agency. Recommendations from the two reports largely relate to BPs ethics and compliance programme and code of conduct, including its implementation and enforcement. The recommendations have been agreed and BP is now in the process of implementing them. The ethics monitor is meanwhile conducting a follow-up review as the next phase of his engagement.
The process safety monitor reviews and provides recommendations concerning BPXPs process safety and risk management procedures for deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. BPXP is the BP group company that conducts exploration and production operations in the Gulf of Mexico. The process safety monitor also submitted a report in 2015. Following discussions between BPXP, the process safety monitor and the US Department of Justice, the recommendations have now been finalized and implementation by BPXP is underway.
Financial update
The group income statement for 2015 includes a pre-tax charge of $12.0 billion in relation to the incident. The charge for the year reflects the amounts provided for the proposed Consent Decree; the Settlement Agreement with the five Gulf states and local government claims as described above; additional provisions made for business economic loss claims under the PSC settlement and other items. As at 31 December 2015, the total cumulative charges recognized to date amounted to $55.5 billion. The total amounts that will ultimately be paid by BP in relation to all the obligations relating to the incident are subject to uncertainty, and the ultimate exposure and cost to BP and the timing of such costs will be dependent on many factors, including in relation to any new information or future developments. These could have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results and cash flows.
BP has provided for spill response costs, environmental expenditure, litigation and claims and Clean Water Act penalties that can be measured reliably. There continues to be uncertainty regarding the extent and timing of the remaining costs and liabilities not covered by the proposed Consent Decree and Settlement Agreement, including:
| Claims asserted in civil litigation, including any further litigation by parties excluded from, or parties who opted out of, the PSC settlement, and the private securities litigation pending in MDL 2185. |
| The cost of business economic loss claims under the PSC settlement not yet processed or processed but not yet paid (except where an eligibility notice has been issued before the end of the month following the balance sheet date and is not subject to appeal by BP within the claims facility). |
| Any obligation that may arise from securities-related litigation. |
Payments made out of the $20-billion Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Trust (the Trust) during 2015 totalled $3.2 billion. As at 31 December 2015, the aggregate cash balances in the Trust and the associated qualified settlement funds amounted to $1.4 billion, nearly all of which was committed to specific purposes including the seafood compensation fund and natural resource damage early restoration projects. As of January 2016, payments in respect of claims and other costs previously funded from the Trust are now being made by BP.
More details regarding the impacts and uncertainties relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill can be found in Risk factors on page 53, Legal proceedings on page 237 and Financial statements Note 2.
42 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
We believe we have a positive role to play in shaping the long-term future of energy.
p
At our US Whiting refinery we have invested in new equipment to reduce air emissions and implemented a monitoring system to provide air quality information to the local community.
We continue to promote deep capability and a safe operating culture across BP.
Our operating management system (OMS) sets out BPs principles for good operating practice.
By the end of 2015 we had completed all 26 recommendations from BPs internal investigation regarding the Deepwater Horizon accident, the Bly Report.
52% of the 353 million hours worked by BP in 2015 were carried out by contractors.
Process safety events (number of incidents)
Recordable injury frequency (workforce incidents per 200,000 hours worked)
a API and OGP 2015 data reports are not available until May 2016.
|
|
Additional information on our safety, environmental and social performance is available in our sustainability report. Case studies, country reports and an interactive tool for health, safety and environmental data can be found at bp.com/sustainability
|
Group safety performance
In 2015 BP reported one workforce fatality in Turkey that occurred when a ceiling collapsed during renovations at a recently acquired retail site. We deeply regret the loss of this life and continue to focus efforts on eliminating injuries and fatalities in our workplaces.
Personal safety performance
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Recordable injury frequency (group) b |
0.24 | 0.31 | 0.31 | |||||||||
Day away from work case
frequency
c
|
0.061 | 0.081 | 0.070 | |||||||||
Severe vehicle accident rate d |
0.112 | 0.132 | 0.122 |
b | Incidents per 200,000 hours worked. |
c | Incidents that resulted in an injury where a person is unable to work for a day (shift) or more. |
d | Number of vehicle incidents that result in death, injury, a spill, a vehicle rollover, or serious disabling vehicle damage per one million kilometres travelled. |
Process safety performance
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Tier 1 process safety events « |
20 | 28 | 20 | |||||||||
Tier 2 process safety events |
83 | 95 | 110 | |||||||||
Loss of primary containment number of all incidents e |
235 | 286 | 261 | |||||||||
Loss of primary containment number of oil spills f |
146 | 156 | 185 | |||||||||
Number of oil spills to land and water |
55 | 63 | 74 | |||||||||
Volume of oil spilled (thousand litres) |
432 | 400 | 724 | |||||||||
Volume of oil unrecovered (thousand litres) |
142 | 155 | 261 |
e | Does not include either small or non-hazardous releases. |
f | Number of spills greater than or equal to one barrel (159 litres, 42 US gallons). |
We report our safety performance using industry metrics, including the American Petroleum Institute (API) recommended practice 754. These include tier 1 process safety events, defined as a loss of primary containment causing harm to a member of the workforce, costly damage to equipment or exceeding defined quantities. Tier 2 events are those of lesser consequence than tier 1.
We seek to record all losses of primary containment regardless of the volume of the release, and to report externally on losses over a severity threshold. These include unplanned or uncontrolled releases from pipes, containers or vehicles within our operational boundary, excluding releases of non-hazardous substances such as water.
We have seen improvements in our process safety performance over the past five years. This has been true across our upstream and downstream businesses, with fewer tier 1 process safety events, fewer leaks and spills and fewer recordable injuries. At the same time, the reliability of our rigs and refineries has improved. We believe this shows that the rigour needed to produce safe operations tends also to produce reliable operations. We will maintain our focus on systematic safety management, including self-verification and testing the effectiveness of our risk mitigation measures.
Our figures for loss of primary containment in 2014 and 2015 include increased reporting due to the introduction of enhanced automated monitoring for remote sites in our US Lower 48 business. Using a like-for-like approach with prior years reporting, our 2015 loss of primary containment figure is 208 (2014 246).
Managing safety
We are working to continuously improve personal and process safety and operational risk management across BP. Process safety is the application of good design and engineering principles, as well as robust operating and
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 43 |
maintenance practices, to avoid accidents. Our approach builds on our experience, including learning from incidents, operations audits, annual risk reviews and sharing lessons learned with our industry peers.
BP-operated businesses are responsible for identifying and managing operating risks and bringing together people with the right skills and competencies to address them. They are required to carry out self-verification and are also subject to independent scrutiny and assurance. Our safety and operational risk team works alongside BP-operated businesses to provide oversight and technical guidance, while our group audit team visits sites on a risk-prioritized basis, including third-party drilling rigs, to check how they are managing risks.
Each business segment has a safety and operational risk committee, chaired by the business head, to oversee the management of safety and operational risk in their respective areas of the business. In addition the group operations risk committee facilitates the group chief executives oversight of safety and operational risk management across BP.
The boards safety, ethics and environment assurance committee (SEEAC) receives updates from the group chief executive and the head of safety and operational risk on the management of the highest priority risks. SEEAC also receives updates on BPs process and personal safety performance, and the monitoring of major incidents and near misses across the group. See Our management of risk on page 51 and SEEACs report on page 71.
Operating management system
BPs OMS is a group-wide framework designed to help us manage risks and drive performance improvements in BP-operated businesses. It brings together BP requirements on health, safety, security, the environment, social responsibility and operational reliability, as well as related issues such as maintenance, contractor relations and organizational learning, into a common management system.
We review and amend our group requirements within OMS from time to
time to reflect BPs priorities and experience or changing external regulations. Any variations in the application of OMS in order to meet local regulations or circumstances are subject to a governance process.
OMS also helps us improve the quality of our activities. All businesses covered by OMS undertake an annual performance improvement cycle and assess alignment with the applicable requirements of the OMS framework. Recently acquired operations need to transition to OMS. See page 45 for information about contractors and joint arrangements.
Security and crisis management
The scale and spread of BPs operations means we must prepare for a range of potential business disruptions and emergency events. We monitor for, and aim to guard against, hostile actions that could cause harm to our people or disrupt our operations, including physical and digital threats and vulnerabilities.
Cyber attacks present a risk to the security of our information, IT systems and operations. We maintain a range of defences to help prevent and respond to this threat, including a 24-hour monitoring centre in the US and employee cyber awareness programmes.
We also maintain disaster recovery, crisis and business continuity management plans and work to build day-to-day response capabilities to support local management of incidents. See page 47 for information on BPs approach to oil spill preparedness and response.
Upstream safety
Key safety metrics 2011-2015
Safety performance
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Recordable injury frequency |
0.21 | 0.23 | 0.32 | |||||||||
Day away from work case frequency |
0.034 | 0.051 | 0.068 | |||||||||
Loss of primary containment incidents number |
153 | 187 | 143 |
Safer drilling
Our global wells organization is responsible for planning and executing our wells operations across the world. It is also responsible for establishing standards on compliance, risk management, contractor management, performance indicators, technology and capability for our well operations.
Completing the Bly Report recommendations
We have completed all 26 recommendations made by BPs investigation into the Deepwater Horizon accident, the Bly Report, aimed at further reducing risk across our global drilling activities.
Our group audit team has verified closure of the recommendations.
See bp.com/26recommendations for the Bly Report recommendations.
The BP board appointed Carl Sandlin as independent expert in 2012 to provide an objective assessment of BPs global progress in implementing the recommendations from the Bly Report. He also provided process safety observations and his views on the organizational effectiveness and culture of the global wells organization.
Over the period of his appointment Mr Sandlin met regularly with wells organization leadership and reviewed the standards and practices developed to complete the recommendations. He made three visits to each of the regional wells teams with active drilling operations, meeting key personnel and drilling contractors on site.
44 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Mr Sandlins engagement came to a close in February 2016 after he reported to SEEAC that all 26 Bly Report recommendations had been closed out to his satisfaction. He stated that the idea of safety as a top priority is firmly ingrained throughout the global wells organization and noted an increase in the degree of rigour and engagement at all levels. Mr Sandlin recommended the organization build on the foundations established by the recommendations and maintain its focus on continuous improvement in the areas of safety culture, self-verification and training.
Safety performance
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Recordable injury frequency |
0.26 | 0.34 | 0.25 | |||||||||
Day away from work case frequency |
0.092 | 0.121 | 0.063 | |||||||||
Severe vehicle accident rate |
0.09 | 0.09 | 0.10 | |||||||||
Loss of primary containment incidents number |
66 | 82 | 101 |
We take measures to prevent leaks and spills at our refineries and other downstream facilities throughout the design, maintenance and operation of our equipment. We focus on managing the highest priority risks associated with our storage, handling and processing of hydrocarbons. We also seek to provide safe locations, emergency procedures and other mitigation measures in the event of a release, fire or explosion.
Process safety expert
Duane Wilsons three-year term as a board appointed process safety expert for our downstream activities came to a close during 2015. Mr Wilson provided an independent perspective on the progress that BPs fuels, lubricants and petrochemicals businesses have made toward becoming industry leaders in process safety performance. Before leaving, he shared his thoughts on possible areas for ongoing emphasis, such as risk management, progress measurement and leadership.
Other businesses and corporate safety
We report on the combined safety performance of our biofuels, wind and shipping businesses, as well as treasury and corporate activities, including centralized functions.
Safety performance
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Recordable injury frequency |
0.29 | 0.44 | 0.47 | |||||||||
Day away from work case frequency |
0.077 | 0.067 | 0.092 | |||||||||
Severe vehicle accident rate |
0.35 | 0.48 | 0.41 | |||||||||
Loss of primary containment incidents number |
16 | 17 | 17 |
Safety in our biofuels business
We have been working to deliver safe and reliable operations in our Brazilian biofuels business since our acquisition of Companhia Nacional de Açúcar e Álcool in 2011. We have done this by introducing a more systematic approach to personal, process and transportation safety. For example, we have segregated pedestrian access from several areas where we operate machinery in our agricultural operations, reducing the likelihood of injury to our workforce.
Working with contractors and partners
BP, like our industry peers, rarely works in isolation we need to work with contractors, suppliers and partners to carry out our operations. In 2015 52% of the 353 million hours worked by BP were carried out by contractors.
Our ability to be a safe and responsible operator depends in part on the capability and performance of those who help us carry out our operations. We therefore work with our supply chain on areas such as safety, operational performance, anti-bribery and corruption, money laundering and human rights, and aim to have suitable provisions in our contracts with contractors, suppliers and partners.
We seek to work with companies that share our commitment to ethical, safe and sustainable working practices. We expect and encourage our contractors and their employees to act in a way that is consistent with our code of conduct. Our OMS includes requirements and practices for working with contractors.
Contractors
We seek to set clear and consistent expectations of our contractors. Our standard model contracts include health, safety, security and environmental requirements, and most now include human rights requirements. Bridging documents are necessary in some cases to define how our safety management system and those of our contractors co-exist to manage risk on a site.
Our partners in joint arrangements
We have a group framework for identifying and managing BPs exposure related to safety, operational, and bribery and corruption risk from our participation in non-operated joint arrangements « .
Typically, our level of influence or control over a joint arrangement is linked to the size of our financial stake compared with other participants. In some joint arrangements we act as the operator. Our OMS applies to the operations of joint arrangements only where we are the operator.
In other cases, one of our partners may be the designated operator or the operator may be an incorporated joint arrangement company owned by BP and other companies. In those cases, our OMS does not apply as the management system to be used by the operator, but is generally available as a reference point when engaging with operators and co-venturers.
p
The Ocean Victory drilling rig in the Juniper field, Trinidad.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 45 |
Throughout the life cycle of our projects and operations, we aim to manage the environmental and social impacts of our presence.
Managing our impacts
We review our management of material issues such as climate change, water, how we work with communities and human rights. This includes examining emerging risks and actions taken to mitigate them. We identify areas for improvement and work to address these where appropriate.
Our operating sites can have a lifespan of several decades and our operations are expected to work to reduce their impacts and risks. This starts in early project planning and continues through operations and decommissioning.
Our operating management system (OMS) includes practices that set out requirements and guidance for how we identify and manage environmental and social impacts. The practices apply to our major projects « , projects that involve new access and those that could affect an international protected area.
In the planning stages of these projects we complete a screening process to identify the most significant potential environmental and social impacts. We completed this process for five projects in 2015. Following screening, projects are required to carry out impact assessments, identify mitigation measures and implement these in project design, construction and operations.
BPs environmental expenditure in 2015 totalled $8,017 million (2014 $4,024 million, 2013 $4,288 million), including charges related to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. For a breakdown of environmental expenditure see page 233.
Climate change
Meeting the climate challenge requires efforts by all governments, companies and consumers. We believe governments must lead by providing a clear, stable and effective climate policy framework, including putting a price on carbon one that treats all carbon equally.
We expect that greenhouse gas (GHG) policy will have an increasing impact on our businesses, operating costs and strategic planning, but may also offer opportunities for the development of lower-carbon technologies and businesses. There is a growing number of emission pricing schemes globally, including in Europe, California and China, additional monitoring regulations in the US, and more focus on reducing flaring and methane
emissions in many jurisdictions.
We are focusing on ways to reduce GHG emissions, including working to improve the energy efficiency of our operations and our products. Around half of our current upstream portfolio is natural gas, which produces about half as much carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) as coal per unit of power generated, and we operate renewable businesses in biofuels and onshore wind.
We currently require larger projects, and those for which emissions costs would be a material part of the project, to apply a standard carbon cost to the projected GHG emissions over the life of the project. In industrialized countries, our standard cost assumption is currently $40 per tonne of CO 2 equivalent. We use this cost as part of the economic evaluation of the investment.
We seek to address potential climate change impacts on our new projects in the design phase. We have guidance for existing operations and projects on how to assess potential climate risks and impacts to enable mitigation steps to be incorporated into project planning, design and operations.
We are also working with our peers. For example, we are an active participant in the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative, a voluntary, CEO-led industry initiative that aims to catalyse meaningful action on climate change through best practice sharing and collaboration. We also joined with seven other oil and gas companies calling on the UN and governments to put a price on carbon.
See bp.com/climatechange for more information about our activities.
Greenhouse gas emissions
We report on direct and indirect GHG emissions on a carbon dioxide-equivalent (CO 2 e) basis. Direct emissions include CO 2 and methane from the combustion of fuel and the operation of facilities, and indirect emissions include those resulting from the purchase of electricity, heat, steam or cooling.
Our approach to reporting GHG emissions broadly follows the IPIECA/ API/IOGP Petroleum Industry Guidelines for Reporting GHG Emissions. We calculate emissions based on the fuel consumption and fuel properties for major sources rather than the use of generic emission factors. We do not include nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulphur hexafluoride as they are not material and it is not practical to collect this data.
Greenhouse gas emissions (MteCO 2 e)
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Operational control a |
||||||||||||
Direct emissions |
51.4 | c | 54.1 | | ||||||||
Indirect emissions |
7.0 | 7.5 | d | | ||||||||
BP equity share b |
||||||||||||
Direct emissions |
48.9 | c | 48.6 | 50.3 | ||||||||
Indirect emissions |
6.9 | 6.8 | e | 6.7 | f |
a | Operational control data comprises 100% of emissions from activities that are operated by BP, going beyond the IPIECA guidelines by including emissions from certain other activities such as contracted drilling activities. Data for emissions on an operational control basis was not available prior to 2014. In 2014 we changed our GHG reporting boundary from a BP equity-share basis to an operational control basis. |
b | BP equity share comprises our share of BPs consolidated entities and equity accounted entities, other than BPs share of TNK-BP and Rosneft. |
c | The 2015 figure reflects our update of the global warming potential for methane from 21 to 25, in line with IPIECAs guidelines. |
d | The reported 2014 figure of 7.2Mte has been amended to 7.5Mte. |
e | The reported 2014 figure of 6.6Mte has been amended to 6.8Mte. |
f | The reported 2013 figure of 6.6Mte has been amended to 6.7Mte. |
In 2015 we updated the global warming potential for methane from 21 to 25. Without this update, our reported direct emissions would have been lower, primarily due to divestments in Alaska.
The ratio of our total GHG emissions reported on an operational control basis to gross production was 0.24teCO 2 e/te production in 2015 (2014 0.25teCO 2 e/te). Gross production comprises upstream production, refining throughput and petrochemicals produced.
See bp.com/greenhousegas for more information about our GHG management and performance.
46 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Oil spill preparedness and response
We are working to continuously improve how we control, contain and clean up oil spills should they occur. Our requirements for oil spill preparedness and response planning, and crisis management incorporate what we have learned over many years of operation.
We updated our oil spill response plan requirements in 2012 to incorporate learnings from the Deepwater Horizon accident. Revised response plans include elements such as specialized modelling techniques to help predict the impact of potential spills, provision of stockpiles of dispersant, and the use of technologies like aerial and underwater robotic vehicles for environmental monitoring. This is a substantial piece of work and BP-operated businesses with the potential to spill oil are on track to complete updates by the end of 2016.
We continue to investigate and test whether emerging technologies can enhance our oil spill response capability. For example, in the Middle East, we have trialled the use of satellite imagery as a way to identify oil spills on land and track clean-up response time.
We seek to work collaboratively with government regulators in planning for oil spill response, with the aim of improving any potential future response. For example, in 2015 we participated in response exercises with government regulators in regions such as Angola, the UK and US.
See page 43 for information on volume of oil spilled by our operations in 2015, including volume of oil unrecovered.
Water
BP recognizes the importance of managing fresh water use and water discharges in our operations and we review our water risks annually. We use industry-standard risk assessment tools, such as the IPIECA Global Water Tool and the World Resources Institute Aqueduct Global Water Atlas, to identify potential quantity, quality and regulatory risks across all our operated assets. We are assessing different technology approaches for optimizing water consumption and wastewater treatment performance. For example, we have evaluated different approaches for reducing fresh water use in our purified terephthalic acid operations, such as wastewater recycling and sea water cooling.
We monitor the increasing number of regulations pertaining to freshwater withdrawals and water discharge quality where we operate. This has led to investments in our wastewater treatment plants at our refineries in Europe and the US.
See bp.com/water for information about our approach to water.
Unconventional gas and hydraulic fracturing
Natural gas resources, including unconventional gas, have an increasingly important role in supplying lower-carbon fuel to meet the worlds growing energy needs. BP is working to responsibly develop and produce natural gas from unconventional resources including shale gas, tight gas « and coalbed methane. We have unconventional gas operations in Oman and the US and we are evaluating unconventional gas opportunities in other countries.
Some stakeholders have raised concerns about the potential environmental and community impacts of hydraulic fracturing during unconventional gas development. BP seeks to apply responsible well design and construction, surface operation and fluid handling practices to mitigate these risks.
Water and sand constitute on average 99.5% of the injection material used in hydraulic fracturing. Some of the chemicals that are added to this, when used in certain concentrations, are classified as hazardous by the relevant regulatory authorities. BP works with service providers to minimize their use where possible. We list the chemicals we use in the fracturing process in material safety data sheets at each site. We also submit data on chemicals used at our hydraulically fractured wells in the US, to the extent allowed by our suppliers who own the chemical formulas at fracfocus.org or other state-designated websites.
We are working to minimize air pollutant and GHG emissions, such as methane, at our operating sites. For example, in the US we use a process called green completions at our gas operations. This process captures natural gas that would otherwise be flared or vented during the completion and commissioning of wells.
Our US Lower 48 onshore businesss approach is to operate in line with industry standards developed within the context of the highly regulated US environment.
See bp.com/unconventionalgas for information about our approach to unconventional gas and hydraulic fracturing.
p
Teams from BP Angola taking part in a shoreline oil spill response exercise the first international oil company event of its type in the country.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 47 |
Canadas oil sands
BP is involved in three oil sands lease areas in Canada. Sunrise, operated by Husky Energy, began producing oil in early 2015 and is currently producing approximately 20,000 barrels per day. Pike, operated by Devon Energy, is at the design stage. Terre de Grace, which is BP-operated, is currently under appraisal for development.
Our decision to invest in Canadian oil sands activities takes into consideration GHG emissions, impacts on the land, water use, local communities and commercial viability.
See bp.com/oilsands for information on BPs investments in Canadas oil sands.
Human rights
We are committed to conducting our business in a manner that respects the rights and dignity of all people. We respect internationally recognized human rights as set out in the International Bill of Human Rights and the International Labour Organizations Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. We set out our commitments in our human rights policy. Our code of conduct references the policy, requiring employees to report any human rights abuse in our operations or in those of our business partners.
We are delivering our human rights policy by implementing the relevant sections of the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (the Guiding Principles) and incorporating them into the processes and policies that govern our business activities.
We are progressing towards alignment with the Guiding Principles using a risk-based approach. This includes working across functions and businesses in areas such as identifying and addressing human rights risks and impacts, community and workforce grievance mechanisms, and contracted workforce, working and living conditions and recruitment processes.
In 2015 our actions included:
| Development and delivery of guidance, tools and training courses to increase human rights awareness across the business. |
| Inclusion of human rights clauses in an increasing number of our supplier contracts. |
| Evaluation of our community grievance mechanisms against the Guiding Principles began at key sites to identify areas for improvement. |
| Continued implementation of the Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights, with periodic internal assessments to identify areas for improvement. |
See bp.com/humanrights for more information about our approach to human rights.
Enterprise and community development
We run programmes to help build the skills of businesses and to develop the local supply chain in a number of locations. In Indonesia, for example, we have supported the foundation of local businesses, providing community members with technical and hands-on training. In the UK we support an apprenticeship programme in the North Sea run by one of our contractors. The programme provides training on the skills required for the safe and reliable operation of our offshore assets.
BPs community investments support development that meets local needs and are relevant to our business activities. We contributed $67 million in social investment in 2015.
See bp.com/society for more information about our social contribution.
Business ethics and transparency
Our code of conduct defines our commitment to high ethical standards.
Our values
Our values represent the qualities and actions we wish to see in BP, they guide the way we do business and the decisions we make. We use these values as part of our recruitment, promotion and individual performance assessment processes.
See bp.com/values for more information.
The BP code of conduct
Our code of conduct is based on our values and clarifies the principles and expectations for everyone who works at BP. It applies to all BP employees, officers and members of the board.
Employees, contractors or other third parties who have a question about our code of conduct or see something they feel to be unsafe, unethical or potentially harmful can get help through OpenTalk, a confidential helpline operated by an independent company.
A total of 1,158 people contacted OpenTalk with concerns or enquiries in 2015 (2014 1,114, 2013 1,121). The most common concerns related to the people section of the code. This includes treating people fairly, with dignity and giving everyone equal opportunity; creating a respectful, harassment-free workplace; and protecting privacy and confidentiality.
p
Staff taking part in BPs code of conduct training in Brazil.
48 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
We take steps to identify and correct areas of non-conformance and take disciplinary action where appropriate. In 2015 our businesses dismissed 132 employees for non-conformance with our code of conduct or unethical behaviour (2014 157, 2013 113). This excludes dismissals of staff employed at our retail service stations.
See bp.com/codeofconduct for more information.
In addition to our code of conduct, we have policies on a variety of related issues, including anti-bribery and corruption, political donations and human rights.
Anti-bribery and corruption
Bribery and corruption are significant risks in the oil and gas industry. We have a responsibility to our employees, our shareholders and the countries and communities in which we do business to be ethical and lawful in all our dealings. Our code of conduct explicitly prohibits engaging in bribery and corruption in any form.
Our group-wide anti-bribery and corruption policy applies to all BP-operated businesses. The policy governs areas such as the inclusion of appropriate clauses in contracts, risk assessments and training. We provide training to those employees for whom we believe it is most relevant, for example, depending on the nature or location of their role or in response to specific incidents.
Lobbying and political donations
We do not use BP funds or resources to support any political candidate or party. Employees rights to participate in political activity are governed by the applicable laws in the countries in which we operate. For example, in the US, BP provides administrative support to the BP employee political action committee (PAC) to facilitate employee involvement and to assess whether contributions comply with the law and satisfy all necessary reporting requirements.
Tax and financial transparency
BP is committed to complying with tax laws in a responsible manner and to having open and constructive relationships with tax authorities. BP supports efforts to increase public trust in tax systems. We engage in initiatives to simplify and improve tax regimes to encourage investment and economic growth.
BP will start to disclose information on payments to governments on a country-by-country and project basis in 2016. The disclosure is required under the revenue transparency provisions contained in the EU Accounting Directive, which was recently brought into effect in UK law. We are awaiting the finalization and adoption of SEC rules under the US Dodd-Frank Act.
As a founding member of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), BP works with governments, non-governmental organizations and international agencies to improve transparency and disclosure of payments to governments. We support governments efforts towards EITI certification in countries where we operate and have worked with many countries on implementation of their EITI commitments, including Australia, Azerbaijan, Indonesia, Iraq, Norway, Trinidad & Tobago, the UK and US.
See bp.com/tax for BPs approach to tax.
BPs performance depends on having a highly skilled, motivated and talented workforce that reflects the diversity of the societies in which we operate.
p
An employee at our service station in Twyford, UK. We are increasing the footprint of our retail presence in many European countries and actively recruiting in these markets.
BP employees
Number of employees at 31 December a | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||
Upstream |
21,700 | 24,400 | 24,700 | |||||||||
Downstream |
44,800 | 48,000 | 48,000 | |||||||||
Other businesses and corporate |
13,300 | 12,100 | 11,200 | |||||||||
Total |
79,800 | 84,500 | 83,900 | |||||||||
Service station staff |
15,600 | 14,400 | 14,100 | |||||||||
Agricultural, operational and seasonal workers in Brazil |
4,800 | 5,300 | 4,300 | |||||||||
Total excluding service station staff and workers in Brazil |
59,400 | 64,800 | 65,500 |
a | Reported to the nearest 100. For more information see Financial statements Note 34. |
We aim to develop the capabilities of our workforce with a focus on the skills required to maintain safe and reliable operations. As we adapt to the current low oil price environment, we are reducing activity and simplifying the way we work. Some of this has resulted in job losses. Our employee headcount at the end of 2015 was 4,700 lower than the previous year.
Our total upstream workforce including employees and contractors is now 20% smaller than it was in 2013, with a reduction of around 4,000 expected in 2016. We are aiming for an upstream workforce of approximately 20,000 by the end of 2016. We expect to reduce our downstream workforce roles by more than 5,000 by the end of 2017 compared with 2014, excluding service station staff and the reallocation of around 2,000 global business services staff from Downstream to Other businesses and corporate in 2015. By the end of 2015, we had already achieved a reduction of more than 2,000.
The group people committee, chaired by the group chief executive, has overall responsibility for key policy decisions relating to employees and governance of BPs people management processes. In 2015 the committee discussed longer-term people priorities, reward, progress in our diversity and inclusion programme, employee engagement, and improvements to our training and development programmes.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 49 |
Attracting and retaining the right people
The complex projects we work on require a wide range of specialist skills from the capability to explore for new sources of energy through to those required for transporting and distributing hydrocarbons safely around the world. We have a bias towards building capability and promoting from within the organization and complement this with selective external recruitment. In 2015 90% of senior leadership roles were recruited from within BP.
We decided to maintain graduate recruitment in 2015, albeit at a reduced level, with a total of 298 graduates joining BP during the year (2014 670, 2013 814). We have worked to maintain our visibility in the graduate job market to help us attract the best recruits, and provide them with high quality early development opportunities. For the second consecutive year BP was the highest ranked energy-sector company in the UK in The Times Top 100 Graduate Employers.
In 2015 46% of our graduate intake were women and 41% were from outside the UK and US.
Building in-house capability
We provide a broad range of development opportunities for our people from on-the-job learning and mentoring through to online and classroom-based courses.
Through our internal academies, we provide leading technical, functional, compliance and leadership learning opportunities. We have six academies, focusing on our operating management system, petrotechnical skills, downstream, midstream, leadership, and functional skills, including finance and legal.
Diversity
As a global business, we aim for a workforce representative of the societies in which we operate. We set out our ambitions for diversity and our group people committee reviews performance on a quarterly basis.
Our aim is for women to represent at least 25% of group leaders our most senior managers by 2020 and we are actively seeking qualified female candidates for our board.
For more information on the composition of our board, see page 56.
Workforce by gender
Numbers as at 31 December | Male | Female | Female % | |||||||||
Board directors |
12 | 3 | 20% | |||||||||
Group leaders |
350 | 81 | 19% | |||||||||
Subsidiary directors |
1,099 | 179 | 14% | |||||||||
All employees |
54,581 | 25,234 | 32% |
A total of 23% of our group leaders came from countries other than the UK and US at the end of 2015 (2014 22%, 2013 22%). We have continued to increase the number of local leaders and employees in our operations so that they reflect the communities in which we operate. This is monitored at a local, business and national level.
Inclusion
Our goal is to create an environment of inclusion and acceptance. For our employees to be motivated and perform to their full potential, and for the business to excel, our people need to be treated with respect and dignity and without discrimination.
We aim to ensure equal opportunity in recruitment, career development, promotion, training and reward for all employees regardless of ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender and gender identity, age, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, or any other characteristic protected by applicable laws. Where existing employees become disabled, our policy is to provide continued employment and training wherever possible.
Employee engagement
Managers hold regular team and one-to-one meetings with their staff, complemented by formal processes through works councils in parts of Europe. We seek to maintain constructive relationships with labour unions.
Each year, we conduct a survey to gather employees views on a wide range of business topics and identify areas where we can improve. We track how engaged employees are with our strategic priorities using our group priorities index, based on questions about their perception of BP as a business and how it is managed in terms of leadership and standards. This measure fell to 69% in 2015 (2014 72%, 2013 72%).
Our survey results show a strong increase in understanding and use of the code of conduct to guide behaviour and that employees remain clear about compliance with safety procedures, standards and requirements.
However, as expected in the current low oil price environment, the proportion of employees responding that they feel more confident about BPs future than they did the previous year has declined. We also saw a decline in scores related to development and career opportunities.
We understand that employees have concerns about the consequences of the lower oil price. We have established additional communications channels to help address these concerns and support employees through our restructuring processes. For example, our executive team has been holding additional face-to-face town hall meetings. In our upstream business we have introduced a dedicated inbox for queries and regular listening sessions between frontline staff and management, with a commitment to follow up on any issues raised.
Share ownership
We encourage employee share ownership and have a number of employee share plans in place. For example, under our ShareMatch plan, which operates in more than 50 countries, we match BP shares purchased by our employees. We also operate a group-wide discretionary share plan, which allows employee participation at different levels globally and is linked to the companys performance.
50 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
BP manages, monitors and reports on the principal risks and uncertainties that can impact our ability to deliver our strategy of meeting the worlds energy needs responsibly while creating long-term shareholder value; these risks are described in the Risk factors on page 53.
Our management systems, organizational structures, processes, standards, code of conduct and behaviours together form a system of internal control that governs how we conduct the business of BP and manage associated risks.
BPs risk management system
BPs risk management system and policy is designed to be a consistent and clear framework for managing and reporting risks from the groups operations to the board. The system seeks to avoid incidents and maximize business outcomes by allowing us to:
| Understand the risk environment, and assess the specific risks and potential exposure for BP. |
| Determine how best to deal with these risks to manage overall potential exposure. |
| Manage the identified risks in appropriate ways. |
| Monitor and seek assurance of the effectiveness of the management of these risks and intervene for improvement where necessary. |
| Report up the management chain and to the board on a periodic basis on how significant risks are being managed, monitored, assured and the improvements that are being made. |
Our risk management activities
Day-to-day risk management management and staff at our facilities, assets and functions identify and manage risk, promoting safe, compliant and reliable operations. BP requirements, which take into account applicable laws and regulations, underpin the practical plans developed to help reduce risk and deliver strong, sustainable performance. For example, our operating management system (OMS) « integrates BP requirements on health, safety, security, environment, social responsibility, operational reliability and related issues.
Business and strategic risk management our businesses and functions integrate risk into key business processes such as strategy, planning, performance management, resource and capital allocation, and project appraisal. We do this by using a standard framework for collating risk data, assessing risk management activities, making further improvements and planning new activities.
Oversight and governance functional leadership, the executive team, the board and relevant committees provide oversight to identify, understand and endorse management of significant risks to BP. They also put in place systems of risk management, compliance and control to mitigate these risks. Executive committees set policy and oversee the management of significant risks, and dedicated board committees review and monitor certain risks throughout the year.
BPs group risk team analyses the groups risk profile and maintains the group risk management system. Our group audit team provides independent assurance to the group chief executive and board, as to whether the groups system of internal control is adequately designed and operating effectively to respond appropriately to the risks that are significant to BP.
Risk governance and oversight
Key risk governance and oversight committees include the following:
Risk management processes
As part of BPs annual planning process, we review the groups principal risks and uncertainties. These may be updated throughout the year in response to changes in internal and external circumstances.
We aim for a consistent basis of measuring risk to allow comparison on a like-for-like basis, taking into account potential likelihood and impact, and to inform how we prioritize specific risk management activities and invest resources to manage them.
Our risk profile
The nature of our business operations is long term, resulting in many of our risks being enduring in nature. Nonetheless, risks can develop and evolve over time and their potential impact or likelihood may vary in response to internal and external events.
We identify those risks as having a high priority for particular oversight by the board and its various committees in the coming year. Those identified for 2016 are listed on page 52. These may be updated throughout the year in response to changes in internal and external circumstances. The oversight and management of other risks is undertaken in the normal course of business throughout the business and in executive and board committees.
There can be no certainty that our risk management activities will mitigate or prevent these, or other risks, from occurring.
Further details of the principal risks and uncertainties we face are set out in Risk factors on page 53.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 51 |
Risks for particular oversight by the board and its committees in 2016
The risks for particular oversight by the board and its committees in 2016 have been reviewed and updated. These risks remain the same as in 2015 other than the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and major project « delivery risks, which are no longer considered to require this additional oversight in 2016. Financial resilience has been added to the high priority risks for particular oversight in 2016. This update reflects the proposed settlements between BP, the United States government and the five Gulf Coast states with respect to federal and state claims arising from the oil spill, as well as current market conditions. Both the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and major project delivery risks will continue to be monitored as appropriate by the board and its committees in the normal course of risk oversight and management.
Strategic and commercial risks
Financial resilience
External market conditions can impact our financial performance. Supply and demand and the prices achieved for our products can be affected by a wide range of factors including political developments, technological change, global economic conditions and the influence of OPEC.
We actively manage this risk through BPs diversified portfolio, our financial framework, liquidity stress testing, regular reviews of market conditions and our planning and investment processes.
For more information on our financial framework see page 18, Our strategy on page 13, Our markets in 2015 on page 24 and Liquidity and capital resources on page 219. |
Geopolitical
The diverse locations of our operations around the world expose us to a wide range of political developments and consequent changes to the economic and operating environment. Geopolitical risk is inherent to many regions in which we operate, and heightened political or social tensions or changes in key relationships could adversely affect the group.
We seek to actively manage this risk through development and maintenance of relationships with governments and stakeholders and becoming trusted partners in each country and region. In addition, we closely monitor events and implement risk mitigation plans where appropriate. We established a new board committee focusing on geopolitical risk in 2015.
Cybersecurity
The threats to the security of our digital infrastructure continue to evolve rapidly and, like many other global organizations, our reliance on computers and network technology is increasing. A cybersecurity breach could have a significant impact on business operations.
We seek to manage this risk through a range of measures, which include cybersecurity standards, ongoing monitoring of threats and testing of cyber response procedures and equipment. We collaborate closely with governments, law enforcement agencies and industry peers to understand and respond to new and emerging cyber threats. Campaigns and presentations on topics such as email phishing and protecting our information and equipment have helped to raise employee awareness of these issues.
Safety and operational risks
Process safety, personal safety and environmental risks
The nature of the groups operating activities exposes us to a wide range of significant health, safety and environmental risks such as incidents associated with releases of hydrocarbons when drilling wells, operating facilities and transporting hydrocarbons.
Our OMS helps us manage these risks and drive performance improvements. It sets out the rules and principles which govern key risk management activities such as inspection, maintenance, testing, business continuity and crisis response planning and competency development. In addition, we conduct our drilling activity through a global wells organization in order to promote a consistent approach for designing, constructing and managing wells.
For more information on safety and our OMS see page 43. |
Security
Hostile acts such as terrorism or piracy could harm our people and disrupt our operations. We monitor for emerging threats and vulnerabilities to manage our physical and information security.
Our central security team provides guidance and support to our businesses through a network of regional security advisers who advise and conduct assurance with respect to the management of security risks affecting our people and operations. We also maintain disaster recovery, crisis and business continuity management plans. We continue to monitor threats globally and, in particular, the situation in the Middle East and North Africa.
Compliance and control risks
Ethical misconduct and legal or regulatory non-compliance
Ethical misconduct or breaches of applicable laws or regulations could damage our reputation, adversely affect operational results and shareholder value, and potentially affect our licence to operate.
Our code of conduct and our values and behaviours, applicable to all employees, are central to managing this risk. Additionally, we have various group requirements and training covering areas such as anti-bribery and corruption, anti-money laundering, competition/anti-trust law and international trade regulations. We seek to keep abreast of new regulations and legislation and plan our response to them. We offer an independent confidential helpline, OpenTalk, for employees, contractors and other third parties. Under the terms of the 2012 criminal settlement with the US Department of Justice and the 2014 settlement with the US Environmental Protection Agency, an ethics monitor is reviewing and providing recommendations concerning BPs ethics and compliance programme.
Find out more about our code of conduct and our business ethics on page 48, and the ethics monitor on page 42. |
Trading non-compliance
In the normal course of business, we are subject to risks around our trading activities which could arise from shortcomings or failures in our systems, risk management methodology, internal control processes or employees.
We have specific operating standards and control processes to manage these risks, including guidelines specific to trading, and seek to monitor compliance through our dedicated compliance teams. We also seek to maintain a positive and collaborative relationship with regulators and the industry at large.
For further information see Upstream gas marketing and trading activities on page 33, Downstream supply and trading on page 36 and Financial statements Note 28. |
52 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
The risks discussed below, separately or in combination, could have a material adverse effect on the implementation of our strategy, our business, financial performance, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity, prospects, shareholder value and returns and reputation.
Strategic and commercial risks |
Prices and markets our financial performance is subject to fluctuating prices of oil, gas, refined products, technological change, exchange rate fluctuations, and the general macroeconomic outlook.
Oil, gas and product prices are subject to international supply and demand and margins can be volatile. Political developments, increased supply from new oil and gas sources, technological change, global economic conditions and the influence of OPEC can impact supply and demand and prices for our products. Decreases in oil, gas or product prices could have an adverse effect on revenue, margins, profitability and cash flows. If significant or for a prolonged period, we may have to write down assets and re-assess the viability of certain projects, which may impact future cash flows, profit, capital expenditure and ability to maintain our long-term investment programme. Conversely, an increase in oil, gas and product prices may not improve margin performance as there could be increased fiscal take, cost inflation and more onerous terms for access to resources. The profitability of our refining and petrochemicals activities can be volatile, with periodic over-supply or supply tightness in regional markets and fluctuations in demand.
Exchange rate fluctuations can create currency exposures and impact underlying costs and revenues. Crude oil prices are generally set in US dollars, while products vary in currency. Many of our major project development costs are denominated in local currencies, which may be subject to fluctuations against the US dollar.
Access, renewal and reserves progression our inability to access, renew and progress upstream resources in a timely manner could adversely affect our long-term replacement of reserves.
Delivering our group strategy depends on our ability to continually replenish a strong exploration pipeline of future opportunities to access and produce oil and natural gas. Competition for access to investment opportunities, heightened political and economic risks in certain countries where significant hydrocarbon basins are located and increasing technical challenges and capital commitments may adversely affect our strategic progress. This, and our ability to progress upstream resources and sustain long-term reserves replacement, could impact our future production and financial performance.
Major project « delivery failure to invest in the best opportunities or deliver major projects successfully could adversely affect our financial performance.
We face challenges in developing major projects, particularly in geographically and technically challenging areas. Operational challenges and poor investment choice, efficiency or delivery at any major project that underpins production or production growth could adversely affect our financial performance.
Geopolitical we are exposed to a range of political developments and consequent changes to the operating and regulatory environment.
We operate and may seek new opportunities in countries and regions where political, economic and social transition may take place. Political instability, changes to the regulatory environment or taxation, international sanctions, expropriation or nationalization of property, civil strife, strikes, insurrections, acts of terrorism and acts of war may disrupt or curtail our operations or development activities. These may in turn cause production to decline, limit our ability to pursue new opportunities, affect the recoverability of our assets or cause us to incur additional costs, particularly due to the long-term nature of many of our projects and significant capital expenditure required.
Events in or relating to Russia, including further trade restrictions and other sanctions, could adversely impact our income and investment in Russia. Our ability to pursue business objectives and to recognize production and reserves relating to Russia could also be adversely impacted.
Liquidity, financial capacity and financial, including credit, exposure failure to work within our financial framework could impact our ability to operate and result in financial loss.
Failure to accurately forecast, manage or maintain sufficient liquidity and credit could impact our ability to operate and result in financial loss. Trade and other receivables, including overdue receivables, may not be recovered and a substantial and unexpected cash call or funding request could disrupt our financial framework or overwhelm our ability to meet our obligations.
An event such as a significant operational incident, legal proceedings or a geopolitical event in an area where we have significant activities, could reduce our credit ratings. This could potentially increase financing costs and limit
access to financing or engagement in our trading activities on acceptable terms, which could put pressure on the groups liquidity. Credit rating downgrades could trigger a requirement for the company to review its funding arrangements with the BP pension trustees and may cause other impacts on financial performance. In the event of extended constraints on our ability to obtain financing, we could be required to reduce capital expenditure or increase asset disposals in order to provide additional liquidity. See Liquidity and capital resources on page 219 and Financial statements Note 28.
Joint arrangements « and contractors we may have limited control over the standards, operations and compliance of our partners, contractors and sub-contractors.
We conduct many of our activities through joint arrangements, associates « or with contractors and sub-contractors where we may have limited influence and control over the performance of such operations. Our partners and contractors are responsible for the adequacy of the resources and capabilities they bring to a project. If these are found to be lacking, there may be financial, operational or safety risks for BP. Should an incident occur in an operation that BP participates in, our partners and contractors may be unable or unwilling to fully compensate us against costs we may incur on their behalf or on behalf of the arrangement. Where we do not have operational control of a venture, we may still be pursued by regulators or claimants in the event of an incident.
Digital infrastructure and cybersecurity breach of our digital security or failure of our digital infrastructure could damage our operations and our reputation.
A breach or failure of our digital infrastructure due to intentional actions such as attacks on our cybersecurity, negligence or other reasons, could seriously disrupt our operations and could result in the loss or misuse of data or sensitive information, injury to people, disruption to our business, harm to the environment or our assets, legal or regulatory breaches and potentially legal liability. These could result in significant costs or reputational consequences.
Climate change and carbon pricing public policies could increase costs and reduce future revenue and strategic growth opportunities.
Changes in laws, regulations and obligations relating to climate change could result in substantial capital expenditure, taxes and reduced profitability. In the future, these could potentially impact our assets, revenue generation and strategic growth opportunities.
Competition inability to remain efficient, innovate and retain an appropriately skilled workforce could negatively impact delivery of our strategy in a highly competitive market.
Our strategic progress and performance could be impeded if we are unable to control our development and operating costs and margins, or to sustain, develop and operate a high-quality portfolio of assets efficiently. We could be adversely affected if competitors offer superior terms for access rights or licences, or if our innovation in areas such as exploration, production, refining or manufacturing lags the industry. Our performance could also be negatively impacted if we fail to protect our intellectual property.
Our industry faces increasing challenge to recruit and retain skilled and experienced people in the fields of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Successful recruitment, development and retention of specialist staff is essential to our plans.
Crisis management and business continuity potential disruption to our business and operations could occur if we do not address an incident effectively.
Our business and operating activities could be disrupted if we do not respond, or are perceived not to respond, in an appropriate manner to any major crisis or if we are not able to restore or replace critical operational capacity.
Insurance our insurance strategy could expose the group to material uninsured losses.
BP generally purchases insurance only in situations where this is legally and contractually required. We typically bear losses as they arise rather than spreading them over time through insurance premiums. This means uninsured losses could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, particularly if they arise at a time when we are facing material costs as a result of a significant operational event which could put pressure on our liquidity and cash flows.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 53 |
Safety and operational risks |
Process safety, personal safety, and environmental risks we are exposed to a wide range of health, safety, security and environmental risks that could result in regulatory action, legal liability, increased costs, damage to our reputation and potentially denial of our licence to operate.
Technical integrity failure, natural disasters, human error and other adverse events or conditions could lead to loss of containment of hydrocarbons or other hazardous materials, as well as fires, explosions or other personal and process safety incidents, including when drilling wells, operating facilities and those associated with transportation by road, sea or pipeline.
There can be no certainty that our operating management system or other policies and procedures will adequately identify all process safety, personal safety and environmental risks or that all our operating activities will be conducted in conformance with these systems. See Safety on page 43.
Such events, including a marine incident, or inability to provide safe environments for our workforce and the public while at our facilities, premises or during transportation, could lead to injuries, loss of life or environmental damage. We could as a result face regulatory action and legal liability, including penalties and remediation obligations, increased costs and potentially denial of our licence to operate. Our activities are sometimes conducted in hazardous, remote or environmentally sensitive locations, where the consequences of such events could be greater than in other locations.
Drilling and production challenging operational environments and other uncertainties can impact drilling and production activities.
Our activities require high levels of investment and are often conducted in extremely challenging environments which heighten the risks of technical integrity failure and the impact of natural disasters. The physical characteristics of an oil or natural gas field, and cost of drilling, completing or operating wells is often uncertain. We may be required to curtail, delay or cancel drilling operations because of a variety of factors, including unexpected drilling conditions, pressure or irregularities in geological formations, equipment failures or accidents, adverse weather conditions and compliance with governmental requirements.
Security hostile acts against our staff and activities could cause harm to people and disrupt our operations.
Acts of terrorism, piracy, sabotage and similar activities directed against our operations and facilities, pipelines, transportation or digital infrastructure could cause harm to people and severely disrupt business and operations. Our activities could also be severely affected by conflict, civil strife or political unrest.
Product quality supplying customers with off-specification products could damage our reputation, lead to regulatory action and legal liability, and potentially impact our financial performance.
Failure to meet product quality standards could cause harm to people and the environment, damage our reputation, result in regulatory action and legal liability, and impact financial performance.
Compliance and control risks |
US government settlements our settlements with legal and regulatory bodies in the US announced in November 2012 in respect of certain charges related to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill may expose us to further penalties, liabilities and private litigation or could result in suspension or debarment of certain BP entities.
Settlements with the US Department of Justice (DoJ) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) impose significant compliance and remedial obligations on BP and its directors, officers and employees, including the appointment of an ethics monitor, a process safety monitor and an independent third-party auditor. Failure to comply with the terms of these settlements could result in further enforcement action by the DoJ and the SEC, expose us to severe penalties, financial or otherwise, and subject BP to further private litigation, each of which could impact our operations and have a material adverse effect on the groups reputation and financial performance. Failure to satisfy the requirements or comply with the terms of the administrative agreement with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under which BP agreed to a set of safety and operations, ethics and compliance and corporate governance requirements, could result in suspension or debarment of certain BP entities.
Regulation changes in the regulatory and legislative environment could increase the cost of compliance, affect our provisions and limit our access to new exploration opportunities.
Governments that award exploration and production interests may impose specific drilling obligations, environmental, health and safety controls, controls over the development and decommissioning of a field and possibly, nationalization, expropriation, cancellation or non-renewal of contract rights. Royalties and taxes tend to be high compared with those of other commercial activities, and in certain jurisdictions there is a degree of uncertainty relating to tax law interpretation and changes. Governments may change their fiscal and regulatory frameworks in
response to public pressure on finances, resulting in increased amounts payable to them or their agencies.
Such factors could increase the cost of compliance, reduce our profitability in certain jurisdictions, limit our opportunities for new access, require us to divest or write down certain assets or curtail or cease certain operations, or affect the adequacy of our provisions for pensions, tax, decommissioning, environmental and legal liabilities. Potential changes to pension or financial market regulation could also impact funding requirements of the group.
Following the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, there have been cases of additional oversight and more stringent regulation of BP and other companies oil and gas activities in the US and elsewhere, particularly relating to environmental, health and safety controls and oversight of drilling operations, which could result in increased compliance costs. In addition, we may be subjected to a higher number of citations and level of fines imposed in relation to any alleged breaches of safety or environmental regulations, which could result in increased costs.
Ethical misconduct and non-compliance ethical misconduct or breaches of applicable laws by our businesses or our employees could be damaging to our reputation, and could result in litigation, regulatory action and penalties.
Incidents of ethical misconduct or non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, including anti-bribery and corruption and anti-fraud laws, trade restrictions or other sanctions, or non-compliance with the recommendations of the ethics monitor appointed under the terms of the DoJ and EPA settlements, could damage our reputation, result in litigation, regulatory action and penalties.
Treasury and trading activities ineffective oversight of treasury and trading activities could lead to business disruption, financial loss, regulatory intervention or damage to our reputation.
We are subject to operational risk around our treasury and trading activities in financial and commodity markets, some of which are regulated. Failure to process, manage and monitor a large number of complex transactions across many markets and currencies while complying with all regulatory requirements could hinder profitable trading opportunities. There is a risk that a single trader or a group of traders could act outside of our delegations and controls, leading to regulatory intervention and resulting in financial loss and potentially damaging our reputation. See Financial statements Note 28.
Reporting failure to accurately report our data could lead to regulatory action, legal liability and reputational damage.
External reporting of financial and non-financial data, including reserves estimates, relies on the integrity of systems and people. Failure to report data accurately and in compliance with applicable standards could result in regulatory action, legal liability and damage to our reputation.
Gulf of Mexico oil spill |
There continues to be uncertainty regarding the extent and timing of the remaining costs and liabilities relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill not covered by the proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement.
The proposed Consent Decree between the United States, the five Gulf Coast states and BP and the Settlement Agreement between BP and the Gulf Coast states will, subject to these becoming effective, settle all federal and state claims arising from the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement are conditional upon each other and neither will become effective until there is final approval of the Consent Decree. There continues to be uncertainty regarding the extent and timing of the remaining costs and liabilities relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill not covered by the proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement. For items not covered by the proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement and for further information, see Financial statements Note 2 and Legal proceedings (page 237).
The Strategic report was approved by the board and signed on its behalf by David J Jackson, company secretary on 4 March 2016.
54 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
governance |
56 |
|
||||||||||||||
60 |
|
|||||||||||||||
62 |
Introduction from the chairman
|
|||||||||||||||
63 |
|
|||||||||||||||
63 | Board membership | |||||||||||||||
63 | Succession | |||||||||||||||
63 | Board meetings | |||||||||||||||
63 |
|
|||||||||||||||
64 |
|
|||||||||||||||
64 |
|
|||||||||||||||
64 | Strategy | |||||||||||||||
64 | Risk | |||||||||||||||
64 | Performance | |||||||||||||||
64 | Monitoring | |||||||||||||||
65 |
|
|||||||||||||||
65 |
|
|||||||||||||||
66 |
|
|||||||||||||||
66 | Private investors | |||||||||||||||
66 | AGM | |||||||||||||||
66 |
UK Corporate Governance Code Compliance
|
|||||||||||||||
66 |
|
|||||||||||||||
66 |
|
|||||||||||||||
66 | Role of the board | |||||||||||||||
66 | Key roles and responsibilities | |||||||||||||||
66 | Appointment and time commitment | |||||||||||||||
67 |
|
|||||||||||||||
68 |
|
|||||||||||||||
68 | Audit committee | |||||||||||||||
71 | Safety, ethics and environment assurance committee | |||||||||||||||
73 | Gulf of Mexico committee | |||||||||||||||
74 | Geopolitical committee | |||||||||||||||
74 | Chairmans committee | |||||||||||||||
75 |
|
|||||||||||||||
76 |
Directors remuneration report
|
|||||||||||||||
76 | Remuneration committee report | |||||||||||||||
90 |
|
|||||||||||||||
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 55 |
As at 4 March 2016 See BPs board governance principles relating to director independence on page 244. |
Board biographies See bp.com/governance
|
56 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Carl-Henric Svanberg
Chairman
Tenure Appointed 1 September 2009
Outside interests Chairman of AB Volvo
Age 63 Nationality Swedish
Career Carl-Henric Svanberg became chairman of the BP board on 1 January 2010.
He spent his early career at Asea Brown Boveri and the Securitas Group, before moving to the Assa Abloy Group as president and chief executive officer.
From 2003 until 31 December 2009, when he left to join BP, he was president and chief executive officer of Ericsson, also serving as the chairman of Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications AB. He was a non-executive director of Ericsson between 2009 and 2012. He was appointed chairman and a member of the board of AB Volvo in April 2012.
He is a member of the External Advisory Board of the Earth Institute at Columbia University and a member of the Advisory Board of Harvard Kennedy School. He is also the recipient of the King of Swedens medal for his contribution to Swedish industry.
Relevant skills and experience Carl-Henric Svanberg is a highly experienced leader of global corporations. He has served as both chief executive officer and chairman to high profile businesses, giving him a deep understanding of international strategic and commercial issues. His experience allows him to co-ordinate the diverse range of knowledge and skills provided by the board.
Bob Dudley
Group chief executive
Tenure Appointed to the board 6 April 2009
Outside interests Non-executive director of Rosneft Member of Tsinghua Management University Advisory Board, Beijing, China Member of BritishAmerican Business International Advisory Board Member of UAE/UK CEO Forum Member of the Emirates Foundation Board of Trustees Member of the World Economic Forum (WEF) International Business Council Chair of the WEF Oil and Gas Climate Initiative Member of the Russian Geographical Society Board of Trustees Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering
Age 60 Nationality American
|
Career Bob Dudley became group chief executive on 1 October 2010.
Bob joined Amoco Corporation in 1979, working in a variety of engineering and commercial posts. Between 1994 and 1997, he worked on corporate development in Russia. In 1997 he became general manager for strategy for Amoco and in 1999, following the merger between BP and Amoco, was appointed to a similar role in BP.
Between 1999 and 2000, he was executive assistant to the group chief executive, subsequently becoming group vice president for BPs renewables and alternative energy activities. In 2002 he became group vice president responsible for BPs upstream businesses in Russia, the Caspian region, Angola, Algeria and Egypt.
From 2003 to 2008 he was president and chief executive officer of TNK-BP. On his return to BP in 2009 he was appointed to the BP board and oversaw the groups activities in the Americas and Asia. Between 23 June and 30 September 2010 he served as the president and chief executive officer of BPs Gulf Coast Restoration Organization in the US. He was appointed a director of Rosneft in 2013 following BPs acquisition of a stake in Rosneft.
Relevant skills and experience Bob Dudley has spent his whole career in the oil and gas industry. He has held senior management roles in Amoco and BP and as the chief executive officer of TNK-BP from 2003 to 2008.
Over the five years that he has been group chief executive, Bob has transformed BP into a safer, stronger and simpler business. By focusing the groups approach on value not volume and operating through a set of consistent values, Bob has guided BPs recovery to a position of greater resilience, to enable it to continue delivering results in an uncertain economic environment.
Dr Brian Gilvary
Chief financial officer
Tenure Appointed to the board 1 January 2012
Outside interests Visiting professor at Manchester University External advisor to director general (spending and finance), HM Treasury Financial Management Review Board Nominated for appointment by the AGM as a non-executive director of LAir Liquide S.A. from May 2016 Member of the 100 Group Committee GB Age Group triathlete
Age 54 Nationality British
|
Career Dr Brian Gilvary was appointed chief financial officer on 1 January 2012.
He joined BP in 1986 after obtaining a PhD in mathematics from the University of Manchester. Following a variety of roles in the Upstream, Downstream and trading in Europe and the US, he became Downstreams chief financial officer and commercial director from 2002 to 2005. From 2005 to 2009 he was chief executive of the integrated supply and trading function, BPs commodity trading arm. In 2010 he was appointed deputy group chief financial officer with responsibility for the finance function.
He was a director of TNK-BP over two periods, from 2003 to 2005 and from 2010 until the sale of the business and acquisition of Rosneft equity in 2013.
Brian will also take on accountability for integrated supply and trading and shipping during 2016.
Relevant skills and experience Dr Brian Gilvary has spent his entire career with BP. He has a strong knowledge of finance and trading, a deep understanding of BPs assets and businesses and has very broad experience of the business as a whole.
Brian has been instrumental in transforming BPs capital structure and operational costs during its recovery and as it adjusts to a low oil price environment, while ensuring the group is capable of meeting new opportunities going forward.
Paul Anderson
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 1 February 2010
Outside interests No external appointments
Age 70 Nationality American
Career Paul Anderson was formerly chief executive at BHP Billiton and Duke Energy, where he also served as chairman of the board. Having previously been chief executive officer and managing director of BHP Limited and then BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc, he rejoined these latter two boards in 2006 as a non-executive director, retiring in January 2010. Previously he served as a non-executive director of BAE Systems PLC and on a number of boards in the US and Australia, and was also chief executive officer of Pan Energy Corp.
Relevant skills and experience Paul Anderson has spent his career in the energy industry working with global organizations, and brings the skills of an experienced chairman and chief executive officer to the board. As chairman of the SEEAC since 2012, he has maintained the boards focus on safety and broader non-financial issues. This year he has worked with Brendan Nelson to integrate the oversight of the |
SEEAC with that of the audit committee, to provide a cohesive and robust overview of business risks.
His experience of business in the US and its regulatory environment has greatly assisted the work of the Gulf of Mexico committee and is an asset to the geopolitical committee.
Alan Boeckmann
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 24 July 2014
Outside interests Non-executive director of Sempra Energy Non-executive director of Archer Daniels Midland
Age 67 Nationality American
Career Alan Boeckmann retired as non-executive chairman of Fluor Corporation in February of 2012, ending a 35-year career with the company. Between 2002 and 2011, he held the post of chairman and chief executive officer and was president and chief operating officer from 2001 to 2002. His tenure with the company included responsibility for global operations. As chairman and CEO, he refocused the company on engineering, procurement, construction and maintenance services.
After graduating from the University of Arizona with a degree in electrical engineering, he joined Fluor in 1974 as an engineer and worked in a variety of domestic and international locations, including South Africa and Venezuela.
Alan was previously a non-executive director of BHP Billiton and the Burlington Santa Fe Corporation and has served on the boards of the American Petroleum Institute and the National Petroleum Council. He was also a board member and trustee of the Eisenhower Medical Center in Rancho Mirage, California and the Advisory Board of Southern Methodist Universitys Cox School of Business.
He led the formation of the World Economic Forums Partnering Against Corruption Initiative in 2004.
Relevant skills and experience Alan Boeckmann has been a chairman and chief executive officer in the worldwide engineering and construction industry and in the energy sector. He brings deep experience to the board and in his roles on the SEEAC and Gulf of Mexico committee, not only from his profession as an engineer but also of international project management and procurement.
Alan joined the remuneration committee in 2015. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 57 |
Admiral Frank Bowman
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 8 November 2010
Outside interests President of Strategic Decisions, LLC Director of Morgan Stanley Mutual Funds Director of Naval and Nuclear Technologies, LLP
Age 71 Nationality American
Career Frank L Bowman served for more than 38 years in the US Navy, rising to the rank of Admiral. He commanded the nuclear submarine USS City of Corpus Christi and the submarine tender USS Holland. After promotion to flag officer, he served on the joint staff as director of political-military affairs and as the chief of naval personnel. He served over eight years as director of the Naval Nuclear Propulsion Program where he was responsible for the operations of more than one hundred reactors aboard the US navys aircraft carriers and submarines. He holds two masters degrees in engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
After his retirement as an Admiral in 2004, he was president and chief executive officer of the Nuclear Energy Institute until 2008. He served on the BP Independent Safety Review Panel and was a member of the BP America External Advisory Council. He was appointed Honorary Knight Commander of the British Empire in 2005. He was elected to the US National Academy of Engineering in 2009.
Frank is a member of the CNA military advisory board and has participated in studies of climate change and its impact on national security. Additionally he was co-chair of a National Academies study investigating the implications of climate change for naval forces.
Relevant skills and experience Frank Bowman brings exceptional experience in safety issues arising from his time with the US Navy and the Nuclear Energy Institute, coupled with direct knowledge of BPs safety goals from his work on the BP Independent Safety Review Panel. He also has a broad perspective of systems and of people from the many other roles throughout his career.
He has built on this experience with the Gulf of Mexico and SEEA committees since 2010 and his background and experience of US and global political and regulatory systems are valuable assets to the geopolitical committee. |
Antony Burgmans
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 5 February 2004
Outside interests Member of the supervisory board of SHV Holdings NV Chairman of the supervisory board of TNT Express Chairman of Akzo Nobel NV
Age 69 Nationality Dutch
Career Antony Burgmans joined Unilever in 1972, holding a succession of marketing and sales posts, including the chairmanship of PT Unilever Indonesia from 1988 until 1991.
In 1991, he was appointed to the board of Unilever, becoming business group president, ice cream and frozen foods Europe in 1994, and chairman of Unilevers Europe committee, co-ordinating its European activities. In 1998, he became vice chairman of Unilever NV and in 1999, chairman of Unilever NV and vice chairman of Unilever PLC. In 2005 he became non-executive chairman of Unilever NV and Unilever PLC until his retirement in 2007. During his career he has lived and worked in London, Hamburg, Jakarta, Stockholm and Rotterdam.
Relevant skills and experience Antony Burgmans is an experienced chairman and chief executive who spent his executive career at Unilever where he developed skills in production, distribution and marketing.
His experience of consumer facing business has meant that he has been able to provide the board with deep insight in the fields of reputation, brand, culture and values. He has served on the board for 12 years and has made a major contribution to the SEEA and remuneration committees and latterly through chairing the geopolitical committee.
Cynthia Carroll
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 6 June 2007
Outside interests Chair of Vedanta Resources Holding Ltd Non-executive director of Hitachi Ltd
Age 59 Nationality American
Career Cynthia began her career as a petroleum geologist with Amoco Production company in Denver, Colorado, after completing a masters degree in geology. In 1989 she joined Alcan (Aluminum Company of Canada) and ran a packaging company, led a global bauxite, alumina and speciality chemicals business and later was president and chief executive officer of the Primary Metal Group, responsible for operations in more than 20 countries. In 2007 she became chief executive of Anglo |
American plc, the global mining group, operating in 45 countries with 150,000 employees, and was chairman of De Beers s.a. and Anglo Platinum Limited. She stepped down from these roles in April 2013.
Relevant skills and experience Cynthia Carroll has led multiple large complex global businesses in the extractive industries. This has required deep strategic and operational involvement. In leading these businesses a high level of interaction with governments, the media, special interest groups and other stakeholders has been needed.
Cynthia is an experienced former chief executive who has spent all of her career in the extractive industries, having trained as a petroleum geologist. Her leadership experience related to enhancing safety in the mining industry brings a strong contribution to the work of the SEEAC, as does her understanding of business strategy in an industry with a long capital return cycle. Her international experience with governments is an asset to the geopolitical committee.
Ian Davis
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 2 April 2010
Outside interests Chairman of Rolls-Royce Holdings plc Non-executive director of Majid Al Futtaim Holding LLC Non-executive director of Johnson & Johnson Inc Non-executive director of Teach for All
Age 64 Nationality British
Career Ian Davis is senior partner emeritus of McKinsey & Company. He was a partner at McKinsey for 31 years until 2010 and served as chairman and managing director between 2003 and 2009.
Ian has a MA in Politics, Philosophy and Economics from Balliol College, University of Oxford.
Relevant skills and experience Ian Davis brings the skills of a managing director with significant financial and strategic experience to the board. He has worked with and advised global organizations and companies in a wide variety of sectors including oil and gas and the public sector, enabling him to draw on knowledge of diverse issues and outcomes to assist the board. His role in the Cabinet Office, from which he stepped down in March 2016, gives him a unique perspective on government affairs.
He has chaired the Gulf of Mexico committee since its formation and has led the boards oversight of the response in the Gulf. |
Professor Dame Ann Dowling
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 3 February 2012
Outside interests President of the Royal Academy of Engineering Deputy vice-chancellor and Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Cambridge Member of the Prime Ministers Council for Science and Technology Non-executive director of the Department for Business, Innovation & Skills (BIS)
Age 63 Nationality British
Career Dame Ann Dowling is a deputy vice-chancellor at the University of Cambridge, where she was appointed a professor of mechanical engineering in the department of engineering in 1993. She was head of the department of engineering at the University of Cambridge from 2009 to 2014. Her research is in fluid mechanics, acoustics and combustion, and she has held visiting posts at MIT and at Caltech. She was appointed director of the University Gas Turbine Partnership with Rolls-Royce in 2001, and chairman in 2009. Between 2003 and 2008 she chaired the Rolls-Royce propulsion and power systems advisory board and now chairs BPs technical advisory committee.
She is a fellow of the Royal Society and the Royal Academy of Engineering and is a foreign associate of the US National Academy of Engineering and the French Academy of Sciences. She has honorary degrees from nine universities, including the University of Oxford, Imperial College London and the KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
She was elected President of the Royal Academy of Engineering in September 2014. In December 2015 she was appointed to the Order of Merit, which is in the sole gift of the Queen and limited to just 24 members.
Relevant skills and experience Dame Ann Dowling is an internationally respected leader in engineering research and the practical application of new technology in industry. The department of engineering at Cambridge University that she led is one of the leading centres for engineering research worldwide, and her contribution has been widely recognized by universities around the world. She chairs BPs technical advisory committee and makes a significant contribution to the work of the SEEAC.
Dame Ann became chair of the remuneration committee in 2015 and has spent time with key shareholders to listen and reflect their views in the work of the committee. |
58 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Brendan Nelson
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 8 November 2010
Outside interests Non-executive director and chairman of the group audit committee of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc Member of the Financial Reporting Review Panel
Age 66 Nationality British
Career Brendan Nelson is a chartered accountant. He was made a partner of KPMG in 1984. He served as a member of the UK board of KPMG from 2000 to 2006, subsequently being appointed vice chairman until his retirement in 2010. At KPMG International he held a number of senior positions including global chairman, banking and global chairman, financial services.
He served for six years as a member of the Financial Services Practitioner Panel and in 2013 was the president of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
Relevant skills and experience Brendan Nelsons career in audit and finance makes him ideally suited to chair the audit committee and to act as its financial expert. He held a range of senior leadership roles at KPMG giving him broad management and business experience. His specialism in the financial services industry allows him to contribute insight into the challenges faced by global businesses by regulatory frameworks.
Brendan brings related input from his role as the chair of the audit committee of a major bank and as a member of the Financial Reporting Review Panel.
Phuthuma Nhleko
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 1 February 2011
Outside interests Non-executive director and chairman of MTN Group Ltd Chairman of the Pembani Group
Age 55 Nationality South African
Career Phuthuma Nhleko began his career as a civil engineer in the US and as a project manager for infrastructure developments in southern Africa. Following this he became a senior executive of the Standard Corporate and Merchant Bank in South Africa. He later held a succession of directorships before joining MTN Group, a pan-African and Middle Eastern telephony group represented in 21 countries, as group president and chief executive officer in 2002. During his tenure at the MTN Group he led a number of substantial mergers and acquisitions transactions.
He stepped down as group chief executive of MTN Group at the end of |
March 2011. He was formerly a director of a number of listed South African companies, including Johnnic Holdings (formerly a subsidiary of the Anglo American group of companies), Nedbank Group, Bidvest Group and Alexander Forbes.
Relevant skills and experience Phuthuma Nhleko has had a wide-ranging career in infrastructure, banking and telephony as well as the extractive industries. This broad experience leading multinational companies, particularly in emerging markets, enables him to contribute strongly to the board and geopolitical committee on strategic matters. His commercial experience also gives him insight into financial issues relevant to the audit committee.
Paula Rosput Reynolds
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 14 May 2015
Outside interests Non-executive director of BAE Systems Ltd Non-executive director of TransCanada Corporation Non-executive director of Siluria Technologies
Age 59 Nationality American
Career Paula Rosput Reynolds is the former chairman, president and chief executive officer of Safeco Corporation, a Fortune 500 property and casualty insurance company that was acquired by Liberty Mutual Insurance Group in 2008. She also served as vice-chair and chief restructuring officer for American International Group (AIG) for a period after the US government became the financial sponsor from 2008 to 2009.
Previously Paula was an executive in the energy industry. She was chairman, president and chief executive officer of AGL Resources Inc., an operator of natural gas infrastructure in the US. Prior to this, she led a subsidiary of Duke Energy Corporation that was a merchant operator of electricity generation. She commenced her energy career at PG&E Corp.
She currently chairs the board of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, Washington. In 2014 Paula was awarded the National Association of Corporate Directors (US) Lifetime Achievement Award.
Relevant skills and experience Paula Rosput Reynolds has had a long career leading global companies in the energy and financial sectors. Her experience with international and US companies gives her insight into strategic and regulatory issues, and her financial background is an asset to the audit committee. |
Paula has led several groups through restructuring and mergers so can contribute knowledge and experience to the board when considering simplification and value creation.
Sir John Sawers
Independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 14 May 2015
Outside interests Chairman and partner of Macro Advisory Partners LLP Visiting professor at Kings College London Governor, Ditchley Foundation
Age 60 Nationality British
Career John Sawers spent 36 years in public service in the UK, working on foreign policy, international security and intelligence.
John was Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, from 2009 to 2014, a period of international upheaval and growing security threats as well as closer public scrutiny of the intelligence agencies. Prior to that, the bulk of his career was in diplomacy, representing the British government around the world and leading negotiations at the UN, in the European Union and in the G8. He was the UK ambassador to the United Nations (2007-09), political director and main board member of the Foreign Office (2003-07), special representative in Iraq (2003), ambassador to Egypt (2001-03) and foreign policy advisor to the Prime Minister (1999-2001). Earlier in his career, he was posted to Washington, South Africa, Syria and Yemen.
John is now chairman of Macro Advisory Partners, a firm which advises clients on the intersection of policy, politics and markets.
Relevant skills and experience Sir John Sawers deep experience of international political and commercial matters is an asset to the board in navigating the complex issues faced by a modern global company. His management of reform at MI6 also complements BPs focus on value and simplification.
As a former UK government representative, Sir John brings knowledge and skills related to analysing and negotiating on a worldwide basis, which are invaluable to the geopolitical and SEEA committees. |
Andrew Shilston
Senior independent non-executive director
Tenure Appointed 1 January 2012
Outside interests Chairman of Morgan Advanced Materials plc Non-executive director of Circle Holdings plc
Age 60 Nationality British
Career Andrew Shilston trained as a chartered accountant before joining BP as a management accountant. He subsequently joined Abbott Laboratories before moving to Enterprise Oil plc in 1984 at the time of flotation. In 1989 he became treasurer of Enterprise Oil and was appointed finance director in 1993. After the sale of Enterprise Oil to Shell in 2002, in 2003 he became finance director of Rolls-Royce plc until his retirement in December 2011.
He has served as a non-executive director on the board of Cairn Energy plc where he chaired the audit committee.
Relevant skills and experience Andrew Shilston is a highly knowledgeable director with wide experience from roles in finance, from several positions as a chief financial officer, and the oil and gas industry in general. His deep understanding of commercial issues has assisted the board in its work in overseeing the groups strategy and in particular the evaluation of capital projects, while his financial skills are an asset to both the audit and remuneration committees.
As senior independent director he has overseen the evaluation of the chairman and led the external evaluation of the board in 2015.
David Jackson
Company secretary
Tenure Appointed 2003
David Jackson, a solicitor, is a director of BP Pension Trustees Limited.
The ages of the board are correct as at 4 March 2016. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 59 |
As at 4 March 2016
Rupert Bondy
Current position Group general counsel
Executive team tenure Appointed 1 May 2008
Outside interests Non-executive director, Indivior PLC
Age 54 Nationality British
Career Rupert Bondy is responsible for legal and compliance matters across the BP group.
Rupert began his career as a lawyer in private practice. In 1989 he joined US law firm Morrison & Foerster, working in San Francisco and London, and from 1994 he worked for UK law firm Lovells in London. In 1995 he joined SmithKline Beecham as senior counsel for mergers and acquisitions and other corporate matters. He subsequently held positions of increasing responsibility and, following the merger of SmithKline Beecham and GlaxoWellcome to form GlaxoSmithKline, was appointed senior vice president and general counsel of GlaxoSmithKline in 2001.
In April 2008 he joined the BP group, and he became the group general counsel in May 2008.
Tufan Erginbilgic
Current position Chief executive, Downstream
Executive team tenure Appointed 1 October 2014
Outside interests Independent non-executive director of GKN plc Member of the Turkish-British Chamber of Commerce & Industry Board of Directors
Age 56 Nationality British and Turkish
|
Career Tufan Erginbilgic was appointed chief executive, Downstream on 1 October 2014.
Prior to this, Tufan was the chief operating officer of the fuels business, accountable for BPs fuels value chains worldwide, the global fuels businesses and the refining, sales and commercial optimization functions for fuels. Tufan joined Mobil in 1990 and BP in 1997 and has held a wide variety of roles in refining and marketing in Turkey, various European countries and the UK.
In 2004 he became head of the European fuels business. Tufan took up leadership of BPs lubricant business in 2006 before moving to head the group chief executives office. In 2009 he became chief operating officer for the eastern hemisphere fuels value chains and lubricants businesses.
Bob Fryar
Current position Executive vice president, safety and operational risk
Executive team tenure Appointed 1 October 2010
Outside interests No external appointments
Age 52 Nationality American
Career Bob Fryar is responsible for strengthening safety, operational risk management and the systematic management of operations across the BP group. He is group head of safety and operational risk, with accountability for group-level disciplines including engineering, health, safety, security and the environment. In this capacity, he looks after the group-wide operating management system implementation and capability programmes.
Bob has 30 years experience in the oil and gas industry, having joined Amoco Production Company in 1985. Between 2010 and 2013, Bob was executive vice president of the production division and was accountable for safe and compliant exploration and production operations and stewardship of resources across all regions. |
Prior to this, Bob was chief executive of BP Angola and also held several management positions in Trinidad, including chief operating officer for Atlantic LNG and vice president of operations. Bob has also served in a variety of engineering and management positions in onshore US and deepwater Gulf of Mexico.
During 2016 Bob will also take on accountability for remediation management.
Andy Hopwood
Current position Chief operating officer, strategy and regions, Upstream
Executive team tenure Appointed 1 November 2010
Outside interests No external appointments
Age 58 Nationality British
Career Andy Hopwood is responsible for BPs upstream strategy, portfolio, and leadership of its global regional presidents.
Andy joined BP in 1980, spending his first 10 years in operations in the North Sea, Wytch Farm, and Indonesia. In 1989 Andy joined the corporate planning team formulating BPs upstream strategy, and subsequent portfolio rationalization. Andy held commercial leadership positions in Mexico and Venezuela, before becoming the Upstreams planning manager.
Following the BP-Amoco merger, Andy spent time leading BPs businesses in Azerbaijan, Trinidad & Tobago, and onshore North America. In 2009, he joined the upstream executive team as head of portfolio and technology and in 2010 was appointed executive vice president, exploration and production. |
Katrina Landis
Current position Executive vice president, corporate business activities
Executive team tenure Appointed 1 May 2013
Outside interests Independent director of Alstom SA Founding member of Alstoms Ethics, Compliance and Sustainability Committee Member of Earth Day Networks Global Advisory Committee Ambassador to the US Department of Energys US Clean Energy Education & Empowerment program
Age 56 Nationality American
Career Katrina Landis is responsible for BPs integrated supply and trading activities, renewable energy activities, shipping, technology and remediation management.
Katrina began her career with BP in 1992 in Anchorage, Alaska and held a variety of senior roles. She was chief executive officer of BPs integrated supply and trading Oil Americas from 2003 to 2006, group vice president of BPs integrated supply and trading from 2007 to 2008, and chief operating officer of BP Alternative Energy from 2008 to 2009. She was then appointed chief executive officer of BP Alternative Energy in 2009.
In May 2013, she became executive vice president, corporate business activities. Since mid-2010 she has served as an independent director of Alstom SA, a world leader in transport infrastructure, power generation and transmission, and is a founding member of Alstoms ethics, compliance and sustainability committee.
Katrina will step down from her executive vice president role in May 2016 and will retire from BP in July 2016. |
60 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Bernard Looney
Current position Chief operating officer, production
Executive team tenure Appointed 1 November 2010
Outside interests Fellow of the Royal Academy of Engineering Member of the Stanford University Graduate School of Business Advisory Council Fellow of the Energy Institute
Age 45 Nationality Irish
Career Bernard Looney is responsible for BPs operated production, with specific accountability for drilling, operations, engineering, procurement and supply chain management, and health, safety and environment in the Upstream.
Bernard joined BP in 1991 as a drilling engineer, working in the North Sea, Vietnam and the Gulf of Mexico. In 2005 he became senior vice president for BP Alaska, before moving in 2007 to be head of the group chief executives office.
In 2009 he became the managing director of BPs north sea business in the UK and Norway. At the same time, Bernard became a member of the Oil & Gas UK Board. He became executive vice president, developments, in October 2010 and took up his current role in February 2013.
During 2016 Bernard will take on the role of chief executive, upstream, in addition to maintaining his current portfolio. |
Lamar McKay
Current position Chief executive, Upstream
Executive team tenure Appointed 16 June 2008
Outside interests Member of Mississippi State University Deans Advisory Council
Age 57 Nationality American
Career Lamar McKay is responsible for the Upstream segment which consists of exploration, development and production. Lamar started his career in 1980 with Amoco and held a range of technical and leadership roles.
During 1998 to 2000, he worked on the BP-Amoco merger and served as head of strategy and planning for the exploration and production business. In 2000 he became business unit leader for the central North Sea. In 2001 he became chief of staff for exploration and production, and subsequently for BPs deputy group chief executive. Lamar became group vice president, Russia and Kazakhstan in 2003. He served as a member of the board of directors of TNK-BP between February 2004 and May 2007.
In 2007 he was appointed executive vice president, BP America. In 2008 he became executive vice president, special projects where he led BPs efforts to restructure the governance framework for TNK-BP. In 2009 Lamar was appointed chairman and president of BP America, serving as BPs chief representative in the US. In January 2013, he became chief executive, Upstream.
During 2016 Lamar will take on the role of deputy group chief executive. In addition to assuming some of the group chief executives duties he will be accountable for group strategy and long-term planning, safety and operational risk, group technology and will also focus on various corporate governance activities including ethics and compliance. |
Dev Sanyal
Current position Executive vice president, strategy and regions
Executive team tenure Appointed 1 January 2012
Outside interests Independent non-executive director of Man Group plc Member of the Accenture Global Energy Board Member of the Board of Advisors of the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy Vice Chairman of the Centre for China in the World Economy, Tsinghua University
Age 50 Nationality British and Indian
Career Dev Sanyal is responsible for the Europe and Asia regions and functionally for group strategy and long-term planning, risk management, government and political affairs, policy and group integration.
Dev joined BP in 1989 and has held a variety of international roles in London, Athens, Istanbul, Vienna and Dubai. He was general manager, former Soviet Union and eastern Europe, prior to being appointed chief executive, BP Eastern Mediterranean Fuels in 1999.
In November 2003 he was appointed chief executive officer of Air BP International. In June 2006 he was appointed head of the group chief executives office. He was appointed group vice president and group treasurer in 2007. During this period, he was also chairman of BP Investment Management Ltd and was accountable for the groups aluminium interests.
During 2016 Dev will take on the role of chief executive, alternative energy and executive vice president, regions. |
Helmut Schuster
Current position Executive vice president, group human resources
Executive team tenure Appointed 1 March 2011
Outside interests Non-executive director of Ivoclar Vivadent AG, Germany
Age 55 Nationality Austrian
Career Helmut Schuster became group human resources (HR) director on 1 March 2011. He completed his post graduate diploma in international relations and his PhD in economics at the University of Vienna and then began his career working for Henkel in a marketing capacity. Since joining BP in 1989 Helmut has held a number of leadership roles. He has worked in BP in the US, UK and continental Europe and within most parts of refining, marketing, trading, and gas and power.
Before taking on his current role his portfolio of responsibilities as a vice president, HR included the refining and marketing segment of BP, and corporate and functions. That role saw him leading the people agenda for roughly 60,000 people across the globe and included businesses such as petrochemicals, fuels value chains, lubricants and functional experts across the group. He is also a non-executive director of BP Europa SE.
The executive team represents the principal executive leadership of the BP group. Its members include BPs executive directors (Bob Dudley and Dr Brian Gilvary whose biographies appear on page 57) and the senior management listed left.
The ages of the executive team are correct as at 4 March 2016. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 61 |
Introduction from the chairman
The membership and work of the board have continued to evolve during 2015. This has been driven by several factors, not least the challenging oil price environment which now dominates our industry. In the years following the Deepwater Horizon accident, the workload of the board, as I have previously reported, increased substantially in response to the issues with which the company was faced. While the number of our meetings has decreased, we still face evolving challenges and I am grateful to Bob, his executive colleagues and my fellow directors for the work that they have done. The commitment required of all of us certainly has not reduced with the number of meetings.
This means that we have to keep refreshed the way in which we work, the matters that we discuss and the decisions that we take. It remains our goal to keep our board time clear for strategic thinking while asking the committees to undertake much of the core tasks of monitoring and oversight. We need to ensure that we have the right skills round the board table to carry out these tasks.
External interest in what boards do increases year on year and it is for this reason that we set out, in the following detail, a description of our activities. Our agendas are prepared in such a way that we have the time to discuss the key issues of the moment without affecting the proper oversight of those matters with which we have to deal. As will be seen from the reports of the committees, directors have visited a number of BPs facilities during the year. This is a key part not only of building our understanding of the business but also testing the mood and the morale of our people in these difficult times.
As we look to the future, it is vital that the work of the board evolves with the business. We cannot be working to one rhythm while the business works to another. It is all too easy for a board to work to a historic schedule created to address past challenges. For this reason I am pleased that this year we have carried out a fully externally facilitated evaluation. We are reflecting on the conclusions which are set out elsewhere; it is important that we keep on learning. However, behind all of this an effective board has to keep asking itself two key questions: are we talking about the right things and are we adding value?
It is some time since we reviewed our governance policies. We will be doing this in 2016. The results of our evaluation will be part of this process. Prompted by changes to the Governance Code, we have further focused on risk and our systems of internal control. This has been a valuable process for the board. After what seems almost annual changes to the Code, I welcome the FRCs decision that this will not be reviewed again until 2019, enabling the UK governance landscape to settle and establish. I am however looking forward to BP being able to contribute to the FRCs work on succession and culture, which both remain key issues for any board.
Carl-Henric Svanberg
Chairman
62 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
On 1 January 2016 the board had 15 directors the chairman, two executive directors and 12 independent non-executive directors (NEDs).
NEDs are expected to be independent in character and judgement and free from any business or other relationship that could materially interfere with exercising that judgement. It is the boards view that all NEDs, with the exception of the chairman, are independent. See page 244 for a description of BPs board governance principles relating to director independence.
The board benefits significantly from the diverse balance of background, gender, skills and experience represented by the NEDs. There are three female directors on the board and three directors from non-UK/US backgrounds.
Director
|
Key skills and experience |
|
Paul Anderson |
Oil and gas industry experience; leading a global business
|
|
Alan Boeckmann |
Engineering, construction and procurement; leading a global business
|
|
Admiral Frank Bowman |
Safety, technology, engineering and risk management
|
|
Antony Burgmans |
Food and consumer goods; leading a global business
|
|
Cynthia Carroll |
Oil, gas and extractive industry experience; leading a global business
|
|
Professor Dame Ann Dowling |
Engineering, technology and education
|
|
Ian Davis |
Strategy, advisory and consulting
|
|
Brendan Nelson |
Audit, financial services and trading
|
|
Phuthuma Nhleko |
Civil engineering, telecoms and banking
|
|
Paula Rosput Reynolds |
Energy industry; leading a global business
|
|
Sir John Sawers |
International affairs
|
|
Andrew Shilston |
Oil and gas industry experience; finance
|
|
Carl-Henric Svanberg |
Manufacturing and telecoms; leading a global business
|
The board is satisfied that there is no compromise to the independence of, and nothing to give rise to conflicts of interest for, those directors who serve together as directors on the boards of outside entities or who hold other external appointments. The nomination committee keeps the other interests of the NEDs under review to ensure that the effectiveness of the board is not compromised.
Paula Rosput Reynolds joined the board in May 2015 as a non-executive director. She is a member of the audit committee and the chairmans committee.
Sir John Sawers also joined the board in May 2015 as a non-executive director. He is a member of the safety, ethics and environment assurance committee, the geopolitical committee and the chairmans committee.
George David, a non-executive director, retired from the board at the annual general meeting on 16 April 2015.
Professor Dame Ann Dowling became the chair of the remuneration committee when Antony Burgmans stood down from the role in July 2015. Andrew Shilston and Alan Boeckmann joined the remuneration committee after the 2015 annual general meeting.
Antony Burgmans became chair of the newly formed geopolitical committee in September 2015. Antony Burgmans will step down from the board at the 2016 AGM after 12 years of service as a non-executive director. Sir John Sawers will then take the chair of the geopolitical committee.
Phuthuma Nhleko will step down from the board at the 2016 AGM after five years of service due to external business commitments.
There were 13 board meetings in 2015, of which two were carried out by teleconference. All directors attended every meeting for which they were eligible, with the following exceptions:
| Phuthuma Nhleko did not attend the board meeting scheduled at short notice on 15 June due to prior commitments. |
| Antony Burgmans, Cynthia Carroll, Brendan Nelson, Paula Rosput Reynolds and Sir John Sawers did not attend the board meeting scheduled at short notice on 23 June due to prior commitments. |
| Phuthuma Nhleko did not attend the board meeting on 3 December due to urgent business commitments. |
Each year BP undertakes a review of the board, its committees and individual directors. The chairmans performance is evaluated by the chairmans committee and his evaluation is led by the senior independent director.
The evaluation operates on a three-year cycle, with one externally led evaluation followed by two subsequent years of internal evaluations carried out using a questionnaire prepared by an external facilitator.
Activity following prior year evaluation
An evaluation was carried out at the end of 2014 by means of a questionnaire, facilitated by an external consultant (Lintstock). The evaluation concluded that reports from the business and on major projects were robust and informative. In a changing economic and geopolitical climate, the board was keen to ensure that it managed its time to allow appropriate levels of discussion by balancing the boards monitoring activities with discussion on strategic matters: this has been achieved by agenda planning during the year. The evaluation highlighted the future role of technology in delivering BPs strategy: briefings on this topic were planned into the boards agenda, including a technology presentation with respect to climate change.
2015 evaluation
For 2015 an externally facilitated evaluation was held in addition to, and to an extent based on, the established annual questionnaire process. Following a selection process led by the senior independent director, Bvalco was engaged as the external evaluator. The results of the annual questionnaire process were shared with the external evaluator who conducted a series of interviews with each director, members of the executive team and those who attended or supported the board. Interviews were focused on evaluating the effectiveness and performance of the board, and separately that of the chairman. In addition to these interviews, the evaluators reviewed the board agendas and materials for the past year and observed a board meeting.
The evaluation tested key areas of the boards work including its participation in the formation of strategy, succession and composition, and its oversight of business performance, risk and governance processes. The effectiveness of the committees in alleviating the oversight task of the board was also tested and focus was given to whether the board added value.
Results of the board evaluation and feedback from these interviews were collectively discussed by the board at its meeting in January 2016, with the results of the chairmans evaluation discussed by the chairmans committee.
The evaluation concluded:
| Recognizing the current state of the market and important developments for the company during the year, there was a continued desire to ensure an effective strategy process that focused on the long term and which acknowledged the important role of the board in this process. |
| Good progress had been made in succession for the board; going forward this would continue to be built on. |
| The board was seen to have a collaborative and inclusive environment. To build on this further, the board agreed to try and put more of their monitoring tasks into the committees to allow more time for broader discussions at the board. |
| Committee work was seen as being of a high quality. Given the breadth of topics covered by the committees, further steps should be taken to ensure that where appropriate all directors could access information and attend external visits for those committees of which they were not members. |
It was noted that the board governance principles would be reviewed and amended to capture these conclusions, where appropriate, and to reflect the current roles and practices within the board.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 63 |
The boards activities are structured to enable the directors to fulfil their role,
in particular with respect to strategy, risk, performance and monitoring.
The board discussed strategy or strategic elements at every full meeting. The board also reviewed the BP Energy Outlook, updated in February 2015, which looks at long-term energy trends and develops projections for world energy markets over the next two decades.
In January the executive team presented the 2015 annual plan to describe how the strategy should be implemented. The board met for two days in Houston in September to review the strategy in depth.
During the year the board, either directly or through its committees, regularly reviewed the processes whereby risks are identified, evaluated and managed. The effectiveness of the groups system of internal control and risk management was also assessed.
The board considered the allocation of group risks between the monitoring committees (the audit, SEEA, and Gulf of Mexico committees, and from September, the geopolitical committee) and the board itself, and confirmed the schedule for oversight of these risks. The group risks reviewed by the board during 2015 included risks associated with the delivery of major projects « , particularly in the Upstream, and geopolitical risk associated with BPs operations around the world. For 2016 the group risks allocated to the board for review include financial resilience (which examines how the group is able to respond to a volatile oil and gas price environment) and cybersecurity (with the audit committee and SEEAC reviewing elements of cybersecurity risk in their work over the year). The group risks allocated to the committees for review over the year are outlined in the reports of the committees on pages 68-72.
Further information on BPs system of risk management is outlined in Our management of risk on page 51.
The board reviews financial and operational performance at each meeting. It receives regular updates on the groups performance for the year across a range of metrics as well as the latest view on expected full-year delivery against external scorecard measures. Updates are also given on various components of value delivery for BPs business.
The board reviews the quarterly and full-year results, including reviewing shareholder distribution policy. Both the 2014 and 2015 annual reports were assessed in terms of the directors obligations and appropriate regulatory requirements.
All meetings include a report from the chair of each committee that has met since the last meeting. These are supplemented with feedback on board and committee site visits, including a deep dive on exploration at the upstream learning centre in Sunbury in May.
The board monitors employee opinion via an annual pulse survey which includes measurement of how the BP values are incorporated into daily culture around our global operations.
The board received an update in December on BPs reputation in the US and UK compared with competitors, based on the results of our 2015 reputation research across a number of consistent reputational attributes measured over time.
64 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
To help develop an understanding of BPs business, the board continues to build its knowledge through briefings and field visits. In 2015 the board received training on ethics and compliance, and the introduction of the new longer-term viability statement. The board met local management and external stakeholders at its board meetings in Sunbury and Houston.
NEDs are expected to attend at least one field visit per year. In 2015 the audit committee visited the cybersecurity centre in Houston and members of the SEEAC visited BPs operations in Trinidad, Oman and Rotterdam. After each visit, the board or appropriate committee was briefed on the impressions gained by the directors during the visit.
The two new NEDs, Paula Rosput Reynolds and Sir John Sawers followed a structured induction process. This included one-to-one meetings with management and the external auditors and also covered the board committees that they joined.
After completing the induction, the directors are asked for feedback on the process to help further improve it going forward.
The company operates an active investor relations programme and the board receives feedback on shareholder views through results of an anonymous investor audit and reports from management and those directors who met with shareholders over the year.
Shareholder engagement cycle 2015
January
|
g
|
BP Energy Outlook presentation
|
||
February | g | Fourth quarter results | ||
g |
Investor roadshows with the group chief executive and chief financial officer
|
|||
March | g | Engagement on remuneration and governance issues | ||
g | Chairman and board committee chairs meeting | |||
g | UKSA private shareholders meeting | |||
g |
SRI roadshow following the launch of BP Sustainability Report 2014
|
|||
April | g | Annual general meeting | ||
g | First quarter results | |||
g |
BPs response to lower oil prices launch
|
|||
June | g | BP Statistical Review of World Energy launch | ||
July | g | Second quarter results | ||
g | Investor roadshows with the group chief executive and chief financial officer | |||
g | Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change meeting | |||
August | g | Engagement with UKSA private shareholder panel on BPs 2014 financial reports | ||
September | g | Oil and gas sector conferences | ||
October | g | Third-quarter results and medium-term outlook | ||
November | g | SRI annual meeting | ||
g | BP Technology Outlook launch | |||
g | Meetings with investors on remuneration (into December) | |||
December |
g |
Medium-Term Outlook launched on bp.com |
||
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 65 |
Senior management regularly meets with institutional investors through roadshows, group and one-to-one meetings and events for socially responsible investors (SRIs).
During the year the chairman and remuneration committee chair held individual investor meetings to discuss strategy, the boards view on BPs performance, governance and remuneration. In March the chairman and all board committee chairs held an annual investor event. This meeting enabled BPs largest shareholders to hear about the work of the board and its committees and for NEDs to engage with investors.
In November the chairman and members of the executive team met with socially responsible investors as part of BPs annual SRI meeting. The meeting examined a number of operational and strategic issues, including how the board looks at risk and strategy, the groups approach to operational risk, context for the sector and BP in terms of oil price and energy supply-demand, operating and energy performance in the Upstream, and BPs response to the shareholder resolution.
See bp.com/investors for investor presentations, including the groups financial results and information on the work of the board and its committees.
BP held a further event for private investors in conjunction with the UK Shareholders Association (UKSA) in 2015. The chairman and head of investor relations made presentations on BPs annual results, strategy and the work of the board. The shareholders asked questions on BPs activities and performance. Later in the year, the UKSA met with the company to give feedback on BPs 2014 financial reports.
Voting levels decreased slightly in 2015 to 62.28% (of issued share capital, including votes cast as withheld), compared to 63.13% in 2014 and 64.24% in 2013. Each year the board receives a report after the AGM giving a breakdown of the votes and investor feedback on their voting decisions to inform the board on any issues arising.
UK Corporate Governance Code compliance
BP complied throughout 2015 with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code) except in the following aspects:
B.3.2 | Letters of appointment do not set out fixed-time commitments since the schedule of board and committee meetings is subject to change according to the demands of business and other events. Our letters of appointment set a general guide of a time commitment between 30-40 days per year. All directors are expected to demonstrate their commitment to the work of the board on an ongoing basis. This is reviewed by the nomination committee in recommending candidates for annual re-election. | |
D.2.2 | The remuneration of the chairman is not set by the remuneration committee. Instead the chairmans remuneration is reviewed by the remuneration committee which makes a recommendation to the board as a whole for final approval, within the limits set by shareholders. This wider process enables all board members to discuss and approve the chairmans remuneration, rather than solely the members of the remuneration committee. |
BPs international advisory board (IAB) advises the chairman, group chief executive and the board on geopolitical and strategic issues relating to the company. This group meets once or twice a year and between meetings IAB members remain available to provide advice and counsel when needed.
The IAB is chaired by BPs previous chairman, Peter Sutherland. Its membership in 2015 comprised Kofi Annan, Lord Patten of Barnes, Josh Bolten, President Romano Prodi, Dr Ernesto Zedillo and Dr Javier Solana. The chairman and chief executive attend meetings of the IAB. Issues discussed during the year included emerging geopolitical issues that could impact BPs business, developments in the Middle East and Latin America, the effects of migration in Europe and the 2016 US election.
The board operates within a system of governance that is set out in the BP board governance principles. These principles define the role of the board, its processes and its relationship with executive management.
This system is reflected in the governance of the groups subsidiaries. See bp.com/governance for the board governance principles.
The board is responsible for the overall conduct of the groups business and the directors have duties under both UK company law and BPs Articles of Association.
The primary tasks of the board include: | ||
g | Active consideration and direction of long-term strategy and approval of the annual plan. | |
g | Monitoring of BPs performance against the strategy and plan. | |
g | Obtaining assurance that the principal risks and uncertainties to BP are identified and that systems of risk management and control are in place to mitigate such risk. | |
g | Board and executive management succession. |
The board seeks to set the tone from the top for BP by working with management to agree BP values and considering specific issues including health, safety, the environment and reputation.
Key roles and responsibilities
The chairman
Carl-Henric Svanberg
| Provides leadership of the board. |
| Acts as main point of contact between the board and management. |
| Speaks on board matters to shareholders and other parties. |
| Ensures that systems are in place to provide directors with accurate, timely and clear information to enable the board to operate effectively. |
| Is responsible for the integrity and effectiveness of the BP boards system of governance. |
The group chief executive
Bob Dudley
| Is responsible for day-to-day management of the group and executes strategy. |
| Chairs the executive team (ET), the membership of which is set out on pages 60 to 61. |
The senior independent director
Andrew Shilston
| Acts as an internal sounding board for the chairman. |
| Serves as intermediary for other directors with the chairman when necessary. |
| Is available to shareholders if they have concerns that cannot be addressed through normal channels. |
| Leads the chairmans evaluation. |
Neither the chairman nor the senior independent director are employed as an executive of the group.
Appointment and time commitment
The chairman and NEDs have letters of appointment; there is no term limit on a directors service, as BP proposes all directors for annual re-election by shareholders (a practice followed since 2004).
While the chairmans appointment letter sets out the time commitment expected of him, letters of appointment for NEDs do not set a fixed-time commitment, but instead set a general guide of between 30-40 days per year. The time required of directors may fluctuate depending on demands of BP business and other events, and they are expected to allocate sufficient time to BP to perform their duties effectively and make themselves available for all regular and ad-hoc meetings.
66 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Executive directors are permitted to take up one external board appointment, subject to the agreement of the chairman. Fees received for an external appointment may be retained by the executive director and are reported in the annual report on remuneration (see page 76).
BP recognizes the importance of diversity, including gender diversity, at the board and all levels of the group. We are committed to increasing diversity across our operations and have a wide range of activities to support the development and promotion of talented individuals, regardless of gender and ethnic background.
The board operates a policy that aims to promote diversity in its composition. Under this policy, director appointments are evaluated against the existing balance of skills, knowledge and experience on the board, with directors asked to be mindful of diversity, inclusiveness and meritocracy considerations when examining nominations to the board.
Implementation of this policy is monitored through agreed metrics. During its annual evaluation, the board considered diversity as part of the review of its performance and effectiveness.
We continue to support the UK governments review of gender diversity on boards, undertaken by Lord Davies in 2011, and maintain an aspiration to increase female representation to 25%. At the end of 2015, there were three female directors (2014 2, 2013 2) on our board of 15. Our nomination committee remains mindful of diversity in considering potential candidates for appointment to the board.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 67 |
Chairmans introduction
2015 was another active year for the audit committee. We took the opportunity of the new UK Corporate Governance Code reporting requirements to take a fresh look at the companys risk management processes. This involved reviewing the groups principal risks, considering scenarios that might impact the companys longer-term viability and debating the categorization of what would constitute significant failings and weaknesses in our system of internal control.
The committee continued to build its understanding of BPs business, including how key risks are identified and mitigated and how segments and functions are performing to achieve the groups strategy. To complement the presentations received in the board room, the committee met employees on several site visits including trading floors in Houston and London and the groups cybersecurity monitoring centre.
During 2015 the committees membership evolved, with our longest-serving member George David retiring in April and Paula Rosput Reynolds joining us in May. I would like to thank George for his insight and challenge during his tenure and to welcome Paula, who brings broad financial and corporate knowledge from her business career. The skills and experience of our committee membership remain strong and I believe that the committee has performed effectively over the year.
Brendan Nelson
Committee chair
Role of the committee
The committee monitors the effectiveness of the groups financial reporting, systems of internal control and risk management and the integrity of the groups external and internal audit processes.
Key responsibilities
| Monitoring and obtaining assurance that the management or mitigation of financial risks is appropriately addressed by the group chief executive and that the system of internal control is designed and implemented effectively in support of the limits imposed by the board (executive limitations) as set out in the BP board governance principles. |
| Reviewing financial statements and other financial disclosures and monitoring compliance with relevant legal and listing requirements. |
| Reviewing the effectiveness of the group audit function, BPs internal financial controls and system of internal control and risk management. |
| Overseeing the appointment, remuneration, independence and performance of the external auditor and the integrity of the audit process as a whole, including the engagement of the external auditor to supply non-audit services to BP. |
| Reviewing the systems in place to enable those who work for BP to raise concerns about possible improprieties in financial reporting or other issues and for those matters to be investigated. |
Members
|
||
Brendan Nelson (chair) | Member since November 2010; committee chair since April 2011 | |
George David | Member from February 2008 to April 2015 | |
Phuthuma Nhleko | Member since February 2011 | |
Paula Rosput Reynolds | Member since May 2015 | |
Andrew Shilston | Member since February 2012 |
Brendan Nelson is chair of the audit committee. He was formerly vice chairman of KPMG and president of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland. Currently he is chairman of the group audit committee of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc. The board is satisfied that Mr Nelson is the audit committee member with recent and relevant financial experience as outlined in the UK Corporate Governance Code. It considers that the committee as a whole has an appropriate and experienced blend of commercial, financial and audit expertise to assess the issues it is required to address. The board also determined that the audit committee meets the independence criteria provisions of Rule 10A-3 of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that Mr Nelson may be regarded as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F.
Meetings and attendance
There were 11 committee meetings in 2015, of which three were carried out by teleconference and five were joint meetings with the SEEAC. All directors attended every meeting for which they were eligible, with the following exceptions:
| George David did not attend the teleconference on 25 February 2015 due to prior commitments. |
| Phuthuma Nhleko did not attend the committee meeting on 23 April 2015 due to a clash with the AGM of another company. |
| Paula Rosput Reynolds did not attend the committee meeting on 23 September 2015 due to a conflicting board meeting. |
Meetings are also attended by the chief financial officer, group controller, chief accounting officer, head of group audit and external auditor.
Activities during the year
Training
The committee held a learning event on changes to the UK Corporate Governance Code and received technical updates during the year from the chief accounting officer on developments in financial reporting and accounting policy.
Financial disclosure
The committee reviewed the quarterly, half-year and annual financial statements with management, focusing on the integrity and clarity of disclosure, compliance with relevant legal and financial reporting standards and the application of critical accounting policies and judgements.
The committee jointly reviewed with the SEEAC whether the BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 was fair, balanced and understandable and provided the information necessary for shareholders to assess the groups position and performance, business model and strategy. The two committees considered the processes underpinning the compilation and assurance of the report in relation to financial and non-financial management information. Following this joint review, the full board reviewed the report as a whole including tone, balance, language and consistency between the narrative sections and financial statements. Part of the boards evaluation included a review of the companys internal processes that form the groups reporting governance framework.
68 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Areas of audit committee focus in 2015
* | Undertaken jointly with the SEEAC. |
Significant areas of accounting judgement considered by the committee during the year
Key issues/judgements in financial reporting | Audit committee review | |||
Oil and natural gas accounting | BP uses judgement and estimations when accounting for oil and gas exploration, appraisal and development expenditure and determining the groups estimated oil and gas reserves. | The committee reviewed judgemental aspects of oil and gas accounting such as intangible asset balances relating to exploration and appraisal activities as part of the companys quarterly due-diligence process. It also examined the governance framework for the oil and gas reserves process, training for staff and developments in regulations and controls. Significant exploration write-offs during the year were disclosed in the relevant quarter. | ||
Recoverability of asset carrying values | Determination as to whether and how much an asset is impaired involves management judgement and estimates on highly uncertain matters such as future pricing or discount rates. Judgements are also required in assessing the recoverability of overdue receivables and deciding whether a provision is required. | The committee reviewed the discount rates for impairment testing as part of its annual process and examined the assumptions for long-term oil and gas prices and refining margins. It received updates from management at each quarter relating to market forward prices used for impairment testing and considered whether any further impairment indicators were present. The committee also reviewed managements approach to reviewing the carrying values of upstream assets following further falls in market forward prices. Significant impairments during the year were disclosed as non-operating items « in the relevant quarter. | ||
Accounting for interests in other entities | BP exercises judgement when assessing the level of control obtained in a transaction to acquire an interest in another entity and when determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and the level of control which continues to be exercised going forward. | The committee continued to reveiw the accounting for BPs investment in Rosneft including the judgement on whether the group has significant influence over Rosneft. During the year the committee received reports from management and the external auditor that assessed the extent of BPs influence, including participation in decision making through the election of two BP nominees to the Rosneft board. It also assessed other factors, including the signing of binding agreements for BP to complete the purchase of a 20% interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha, a Rosneft subsidiary « . | ||
The groups trading activities | BP uses judgement when estimating the fair value of some derivative instruments in cases where there is an absence of liquid market pricing information for example, relating to supply and trading activities. | The committee received a detailed briefing on the groups trading risk, controls and compliance and visited BPs trading floors in Houston and London. The committee considered the controls in place to prevent unauthorized trading activity and received information on the valuation of the groups derivative instrument and the financial models that are used. | ||
Provisions and contingencies | The group holds provisions for the future decommissioning of oil and natural gas production facilities and pipelines at the end of their economic lives. Most of these decommissioning events are in the long term and the requirements that will have to be met when a removal event occurs are uncertain. Judgement is applied when estimating issues such as settlement dates, technology and legal requirements. | The committee received briefings on the groups decommissioning, environmental remediation and litigation provisioning, including key assumptions used, the governance framework applied (covering accountabilities and controls), discount rates and the movement in provisions over time. |
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 69 |
Accounting judgements and estimates (continued)
Key issues/judgements in financial reporting | Audit committee review | |||
Gulf of Mexico oil spill | Judgement was applied during the year around the significant uncertainties over provisions and contingencies relating to the incident. | The committee regularly discussed BPs provisioning for and the disclosure of contingent liabilities relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill with management and the external auditors, including as part of the review of BPs stock exchange announcement at each quarter end. The committee examined the provisions booked as a result of the agreements in principle signed in July. In instances where a reliable estimate could not be made of the provision required, the committee considered managements conclusions and monitored developments while considering the impact on the financial statements and other disclosures. | ||
Pensions and other post-retirement benefits | Accounting for pensions and other post-retirement benefits involves judgement about uncertain events, including discount rates, inflation and life expectancy. | The committee examined the assumptions used by management as part of its annual reporting process. | ||
Taxation | Computation of the groups tax expense and liability, provisioning for potential tax liabilities and the level of deferred tax asset recognition in relation to accumulated tax losses are underpinned by management judgement. | The committee reviewed the judgements exercised on tax provisioning as part of its annual review of key provisions. |
Risk reviews
The group risks allocated to the audit committee for monitoring in 2015 included those associated with trading activities, compliance with applicable laws and regulations and security threats against BPs digital infrastructure. The committee held in-depth reviews of these group risks over the year. It also examined the groups information technology risks, its governance of the tax function and the use of financial models including their associated controls framework. The committee further considered the financial group (or principal) risks identified for 2016 and the groups process to assess, mitigate and monitor them. BPs principal risks are listed on page 53. For 2016, the board has agreed that the committee will monitor cybersecurity, trading activities and compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
Other reviews
During the year the committee reviewed succession and development of the groups finance function, including an overview of the demographics and key capability challenges for finance staff. The groups Downstream segment was reviewed to examine the financial performance and strategic priorities of the individual fuels, lubricants and petrochemicals businesses, including key areas of financial risk management.
Internal control and risk management
The committee reviewed the groups system of internal control and risk management throughout the year, holding a joint meeting with the SEEAC to discuss key audit findings and managements actions. The committee reviewed the scope, activity and effectiveness of the group audit function and met privately with the head of group audit and his leadership team during the year.
During the year the committee examined the requirements of the revised UK Corporate Governance Code in relation to the assessment and reporting of longer-term viability, risk management and internal control. The committee looked at key elements of BPs risk management process, including the reporting and categorisation of risk across the group, and jointly with the SEEAC examined what might constitute a significant failing or weakness in the system of internal control. The two committees also reviewed the modelling undertaken to stress test different financial and operational events and considered the appropriate period for which the company was viable.
The committee received quarterly reports on the findings of group audit, on significant allegations and investigations and on key ethics and compliance issues; a joint meeting was held with the SEEAC to discuss the annual report certifying compliance with the BP code of conduct. The two committees also met to discuss future programmes for the group audit and ethics and compliance functions. The committee held a private meeting with the group ethics and compliance officer during the year.
External audit
The external auditors set out their audit strategy, identifying key risks to be considered during the year including longer-term oil and gas prices, the groups cost outlook, the capital framework in a lower oil price environment, discount rate assumptions, considerations around impairments, estimation of oil and gas reserves and resources, decommissioning, valuation of exploration assets, accounting for BPs investment in the Rosneft subsidiary Taas, deferred taxation, estimation of the groups pension obligations, the recovery of receivables and management of change.
The committee received updates during the year on the audit process, including how the auditors had independently considered the groups assumptions on these issues.
The audit committee reviews the fee structure, resourcing and terms of engagement for the external auditor annually. Fees paid to the external auditor for the year were $51 million (2014 $53 million), of which 6% was for non-assurance work (see Financial statements Note 35). Non-audit or non-audit related assurance fees were $3 million (2014 $5 million). The $2-million reduction in non-audit fees relates primarily to decreases in tax advisory and other assurance services. Non-audit or non-audit related assurance services consisted of tax compliance services, tax advisory services, other assurance services and services relating to corporate finance transactions. The audit committee is satisfied that this level of fee is appropriate in respect of the audit services provided and that an effective audit can be conducted for this fee.
The effectiveness of the audit process was evaluated through two surveys one completed by committee members only and the second by those BP personnel impacted by the audit. The surveys used a set of criteria to measure the auditors performance against the quality commitment set out in their annual audit plan. This included the robustness of the audit process, independence and objectivity, quality of delivery, quality of people and service and value added advice.
70 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Overall the 2015 evaluation concluded that the external auditor
performance had either improved or remained consistent in key areas with the previous year. Areas with high scores included independence, objectivity and the quality of delivery of the audit. Areas of suggested focus for the auditors included audit team turnover and more liaison between BPs own audit function and the external auditors, with the intent that improved planning could prevent duplication. There was also feedback that the technical knowledge and experience of the audit team remained strong.
The committee held private meetings with the external auditors during the year and the chair met privately with the external auditor before each meeting.
Auditor appointment and independence
The committee considers the reappointment of the external auditor each year before making a recommendation to the board and shareholders. It assesses the independence of the external auditor on an ongoing basis and the external auditor is required to rotate the lead audit partner every five years and other senior audit staff every seven years. No partners or senior staff associated with the BP audit may transfer to the group. The current lead partner has been in place since the start of 2013.
Audit tendering
During the year the committee reviewed the groups position on its audit services contract and examined a number of options regarding the timing of tendering for BPs external audit, including the mandatory rotation of the groups audit firm, taking into account the UK Corporate Governance Code and the reforms of the audit market by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) and the European Union.
The committee concluded that the best interests of the group and its shareholders would be served by utilizing the transition arrangements outlined by the Financial Reporting Council and retaining BPs existing audit firm until the conclusion of the term of its current lead partner. The committee intends that the audit contract will be put out to tender in 2016 so that a decision can be taken and communicated to shareholders at BPs AGM in 2017. It is expected that the new audit services contract would be effective from 2018.
BP has complied throughout 2015 with the provisions of The Statutory Audit Services Order 2014, issued by the CMA.
Non-audit services
BPs policy on non-audit services states that the auditors may not perform non-audit services that are prohibited by the SEC, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and UK Auditing Practices Board (APB).
The audit committee approves the terms of all audit services as well as permitted audit-related and non-audit services in advance. The external auditor is only considered for permitted non-audit services when its expertise and experience of the company is important. A two-tier system for approval of audit-related and non-audit work operates. For services relating to accounting, auditing and financial reporting matters, internal accounting and risk management control reviews or non-statutory audit, the committee has agreed to pre-approve these services up to an annual aggregate level. For all other services which fall under the permitted services categories, approval above a certain financial amount must be sought on a case-by-case basis. Any proposed service not included in the permitted services categories must be approved in advance either by the audit committee chairman or the audit committee before engagement commences. The audit committee, chief financial officer and group controller monitor overall compliance with BPs policy on audit-related and non-audit services, including whether the necessary pre-approvals have been obtained. The categories of permitted and pre-approved services are outlined in Principal accountants fees and services on page 245.
During the year, the committee reviewed the groups policy on audit-related and non-audit services and it was determined that transfer-pricing services should be moved into the category of work requiring approval from the audit committee chairman or the full committee.
Committee review
The audit committee undertakes an annual evaluation of its performance and effectiveness. In late 2015 the committee used an online survey and externally facilitated interviews to examine governance issues such as committee processes and support, the work of the committee and priorities for change. The review concluded that the committee had
performed effectively. Areas of focus arising from the evaluation included continuing broader segment and business reviews in the committees 2016 agenda, examining how areas of overlap between the committee and the SEEAC in terms of financial and operational risk could be managed and suggestions for further committee training and committee visits.
Safety, ethics and environment assurance committee (SEEAC)
Chairmans introduction
The SEEAC has continued to monitor closely and provide constructive challenge to management in the drive for safe and reliable operations at all times. This included the committee receiving individual reports on the companys management of highest priority group risks in marine, wells, pipelines, explosion or release at our facilities, and major security incidents. The committee also undertook a number of field visits as well as maintaining its schedule of regular meetings with executive management.
We received final reports from the independent experts we engaged in Upstream (Carl Sandlin) and Downstream (Duane Wilson). They provided valuable insights and advice on many aspects of process safety and we are grateful to them for their work.
We were pleased to welcome Sir John Sawers to the committee in July. John brings valuable experience and insight from his time in government service.
Paul Anderson
Committee chair
Role of the committee
The role of the SEEAC is to look at the processes adopted by BPs executive management to identify and mitigate significant non-financial risk. This includes monitoring the management of personal and process safety and receiving assurance that processes to identify and mitigate such non-financial risk are appropriate in design and effective in implementation.
Key responsibilities
The committee receives specific reports from the business segments as well as cross-business information from the functions. These include, but are not limited to, the safety and operational risk function, group audit, group ethics and compliance, business integrity and group security. The SEEAC can access any other independent advice and counsel it requires, on an unrestricted basis.
At a joint meeting with the audit committee, the SEEAC reviewed the general auditors report on the system of internal control and risk management for the year in preparation for the boards report to shareholders. In that meeting the committees also reviewed the group audit programme for the year ahead to ensure both committees endorsed the coverage. The committees worked together, through their chairs and secretaries, to ensure that the agendas did not overlap or omit coverage of any key risks during the year.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 71 |
Members
|
||
Paul Anderson (chairman) |
Member since February 2010; committee chair since December 2012 | |
Alan Boeckmann | Member since September 2014 | |
Frank Bowman | Member since November 2010 | |
Antony Burgmans | Member since February 2004 | |
Cynthia Carroll | Member since June 2007 | |
Ann Dowling | Member since February 2012 | |
John Sawers | Member since July 2015 |
Meetings and attendance
There were six committee meetings in 2015, plus an additional five joint meetings with the audit committee. All directors attended every meeting for which they were eligible, with the following exceptions:
| Alan Boeckmann did not attend the committee meeting on 13 May 2015 due to prior commitments. |
| Cynthia Carroll did not attend the committee meeting on 2 December 2015 due to a conflicting board meeting. |
In addition to the committee membership, all SEEAC meetings were attended by the group chief executive, the executive vice president for safety and operational risk (S&OR) and the head of group audit or his delegate. The external auditor attended some of the meetings (and was briefed on the other meetings by the chair and secretary to the committee), as did the group general counsel and group ethics and compliance officer. The committee scheduled private sessions for the committee members only (without the presence of executive management) at the conclusion of each meeting to discuss any issues arising and the quality of the meeting.
Activities during the year
Safety, operations and environment
The committee received regular reports from the S&OR function, including quarterly reports prepared for executive management on the groups health, safety and environmental performance and operational integrity. These included quarter-by-quarter measures of personal and process safety, environmental and regulatory compliance and audit findings. Operational risk and performance forms a large part of the committees agenda.
During the year the committee received specific and separate reports on the companys management of risks in marine, wells, pipelines, explosion or release at our facilities and major security incidents. The committee reviewed these risks and their risk management and mitigation in depth with relevant executive management.
Independent expert Upstream
Mr Carl Sandlin continued in his role as an independent expert to provide further oversight regarding the implementation of the Bly Report recommendations. He formally reported directly to the SEEAC twice in 2015 and presented detailed reports on his work, including reporting on a number of visits made to company operations around the world; he also met in private with the chair and other members of the committee during the year. He reported that all 26 recommendations in the Bly Report were completed by the end of 2015. He gave his final report to the SEEAC in January 2016 and his engagement ceased in February 2016. We thank him for his work with the committee since 2012.
Process safety expert Downstream
Mr Duane Wilson finalized his engagement with the committee in his role as process safety expert for the Downstream segment. He completed his work with segment management to monitor and advise on the process safety culture and learnings across the segment. He submitted his final report to the SEEAC in January 2015 and completed his engagement in April 2015. The committee thanks him for his work, including on process safety culture.
Reports from group audit, group ethics and compliance and the business integrity functions
The committee received quarterly reports from each of these functions. In addition, both the head of group audit and the group ethics and compliance officer met in private with the chairman and other members of the committee during the year.
Field trips
In June members of the committee visited Trinidad to examine both the offshore facilities (the Cassia platform) and the onshore liquefied natural gas terminal (Atlantic LNG). In November the chairman and other committee members visited operations at the Khazzan gas field development in Oman; in December the chairman and other members of the committee and the board visited the Rotterdam refinery in the Netherlands. In all cases, the visiting committee members received briefings on operations, the status of local operating management system « (OMS) implementation and risk management and mitigation. Committee members then reported back in detail about each visit to the committee and subsequently to the board.
Committee review
For its 2015 evaluation, the committee examined its performance and effectiveness through a questionnaire and interviews by external facilitators. Topics covered included the balance of skills and experience among its members, the quality and timeliness of information the committee receives, the level of challenge between committee members and management and how well the committee communicates its activities and findings to the board.
SEEAC focus in 2015
* | Undertaken jointly with the audit committee. |
72 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
The evaluation results were generally positive. Committee members considered that the committee continued to possess the right mix of skills and background, had an appropriate level of support and received open and transparent briefings from management. The committee considered that the field trips remained an important element of its work, in particular as such trips gave committee members the opportunity to examine how risk management is being embedded in businesses and facilities, including management culture. An area of focus for 2016 will be examining areas of overlap across the committee and the audit committee in terms of how financial and operational risk could be better managed.
Chairmans introduction
The Gulf of Mexico committee continued to oversee the groups response to the Deepwater Horizon accident, ensuring the company fulfils all its legitimate obligations while protecting and defending the interests of the group. The major development in the year was the execution of agreements in principle with the United States and five Gulf states (Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas) on 2 July. These agreements, subject to final court approval of the proposed Consent Decree, resolve all Clean Water Act penalties, natural resource damage claims and various economic loss claims pursued by the Gulf states.
Assuming that the Consent Decree order is approved by the court as anticipated, we intend to recommend to the board that the committee ceases its activities and is stood down at the end of the first quarter of 2016. Reporting of remaining proceedings will be made directly to the board or other committees as appropriate thereafter.
Ian Davis
Committee chair
Role of the committee
The committee was formed in July 2010 to oversee the management and mitigation of legal and licence to operate risks arising out of the Deepwater Horizon accident and oil spill. Its work is integrated with that of the board, which retains ultimate accountability for oversight of the groups response to the accident.
Key responsibilities
| Oversee the legal strategy for litigation, investigations and suspension/ debarment actions arising from the accident and its aftermath, including the strategy connected with settlements and claims. |
| Review the environmental work to remediate or mitigate the effects of the oil spill in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico and on the affected shorelines. |
| Oversee management strategy and actions to restore the groups reputation in the US. |
| Review compliance with government settlement agreements arising out of the Deepwater Horizon accident and oil spill, including the SEC Consent Order, the Department of Justice plea agreement and the EPA administrative agreement. This is done in co-ordination with other committees and board oversight. |
Members
|
||
Ian Davis (chair) | Member since July 2010; committee chair since July 2010 | |
Paul Anderson | Member since July 2010 | |
Alan Boeckmann | Member since September 2014 | |
Frank Bowman | Member since February 2012 | |
George David | Member from July 2010 to April 2015 |
George David ceased to be a member of the committee when he retired from the board in April 2015.
Meetings and attendance
There were five committee meetings in 2015, including one by teleconference. All directors attended every meeting for which they were eligible, with the exception of George David who did not attend the committee meeting called at short notice on 9 February 2015 due to a prior commitment.
Gulf of Mexico committee focus in 2015
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 73 |
Chairmans introduction
I am pleased to report on the work of this committee that was formed during 2015. I have been asked to chair this committee until the 2016 AGM, when I will retire from the board and Sir John Sawers will take the chair.
Antony Burgmans
Committee chair
Role of the committee
The committee monitors the companys identification and management of geopolitical risk.
Key responsibilities
| To monitor the companys identification and management of major and correlated geopolitical risk and to consider reputational as well as financial consequences: |
| Major geopolitical risks are those brought about by social, economic or political events that occur in countries where BP has material investments that can be jeopardized; |
| Correlated geopolitical risks are those brought about by social, economic or political events that occur in countries where BP may or may not have a presence but that can lead to global political instability. |
| To review the companys activities in the context of political and economic developments on a regional basis and to advise the board on these elements in its consideration of BPs strategy and the annual plan. |
Members
|
||
Antony Burgmans (chair) |
Member and committee chair since September 2015 | |
Paul Anderson | Member since September 2015 | |
Frank Bowman | Member since September 2015 | |
Cynthia Carroll | Member since September 2015 | |
Phuthuma Nhleko | Member since September 2015 | |
John Sawers | Member since September 2015 | |
Andrew Shilston | Member since September 2015 |
Carl-Henric Svanberg and Bob Dudley attend all committee meetings and the executive vice president, strategy and regions and the vice president, government and political affairs attend as required.
Activities during the year
The committee met twice during the year. During those meetings it considered:
| The committees terms of reference. |
| An overview of the companys current geopolitical risks. |
| The relationship of the committee with the International Advisory Board. |
| The effect of the oil price on geopolitical matters. |
| The companys relationships with national oil companies. |
| The companys relationships in specific countries and regions. |
Chairmans and nomination committees
Chairmans introduction
I am pleased to report on the two board committees that I chair. Both actively sought to develop the membership of the board and its governance during the year.
Carl-Henric Svanberg
Committees chair
Chairmans committee
Role of the committee
To provide a forum for matters to be discussed among the non-executive directors.
Key responsibilities
| Evaluate the performance and the effectiveness of the group chief executive. |
| Review the structure and effectiveness of the business organization. |
| Review the systems for senior executive development and determine the succession plan for the group chief executive, the executive directors and other senior members of executive management. |
| Determine any other matter that is appropriate to be considered by non-executive directors. |
| Opine on any matter referred to it by the chairman of any committees comprised solely of non-executive directors. |
Members
The committee comprises all non-executive directors who join the committee at the date of their appointment to the board. The chief executive attends the committee when requested.
Activities during the year
The committee met seven times in the year. During the year the committee:
| Monitored the progress of the Gulf of Mexico litigation and, in particular, considered the proposals which led to the Agreements in Principle to settle federal and state claims and claims made by local government entities. |
| Reviewed BPs strategy in light of the continuing decline in oil prices. |
| Considered the succession and organization of the executive team. |
| Evaluated the performance of the chairman and chief executive. |
74 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Role of the committee
The committee ensures an orderly succession of candidates for directors and the company secretary.
Key responsibilities
| Identify, evaluate and recommend candidates for appointment or reappointment as directors. |
| Identify, evaluate and recommend candidates for appointment as company secretary. |
| Keep under review the mix of knowledge, skills and experience of the board to ensure the orderly succession of directors. |
| Review the outside directorship/commitments of non-executive directors. |
Members
|
||
Carl-Henric Svanberg (chair) |
Member since September 2009; committee chair since January 2010 | |
Paul Anderson | Member since April 2012 | |
Cynthia Carroll | Member from May 2011 to May 2015 | |
Antony Burgmans | Member since May 2011 | |
Ann Dowling | Member since May 2015 | |
Ian Davis | Member since August 2010 | |
Brendan Nelson | Member since April 2012 | |
Andrew Shilston |
Member since May 2015, but attended previously as senior independent director
|
During the year Ann Dowling and Andrew Shilston joined the committee and Cynthia Carroll stood down.
Activities during the year
In 2014 the committee had previously identified Paula Reynolds and Sir John Sawers as candidates to join the board; they then both joined in May 2015. With the total number of the board standing at 15, the committee met once during the year to carry out a broader review of board composition and skills in light of BPs strategy and the potential sequencing of board retirements. The committee focused on non-executive membership of the board as executive succession is considered in the chairmans committee.
By most standards the board would be considered large. The committee notes that as Antony Burgmans and Phuthuma Nhleko will be standing down at the 2016 AGM, the optimum size of the board should be considered together with the skills relevant for the board and its committees. The committee was of the view that the current board is well balanced with an appropriate breadth of skills. Industry experience needs to be maintained as does the balance between former chief executives and those with different functional and sectoral expertise. The need to maintain diversity in all forms remains a major consideration for a board in a global business and the committee reviewed how potential appointments meet the boards aspirations on diversity, inclusiveness and meritocracy. The committee also remained mindful of BPs commitment to Lord Davies report and work on women on boards.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 75 |
Directors remuneration report
The Chairmans Statement (which forms part of the Directors Remuneration Report) is located on pages 22-23. Please refer to this for an overview from Professor Dame Ann Dowling on the performance and pay outcomes for 2015.
2015 annual report on remuneration
Highlights of the year
|
||
Strong safety and operational performance in a difficult environment
|
||
|
Responded early and decisively to lower oil price environment.
|
|
|
Excellent safety standards with continuous improvement over the past three years, leading to improvements in reliability and operations.
|
|
|
Strong operating cash flow « and underlying replacement cost profit relative to plan.
|
|
|
Net investment (organic) « managed aggressively to reflect lower for longer oil price environment.
|
|
|
Executive directors pay outcomes reflect strong operating performance relative to plan.
|
|
|
Alignment between executives and shareholders with the majority of executive director remuneration paid in equity with lengthy retention requirements.
|
77 |
|
|||
78 | Salary and benefits | |||
78 | Annual bonus | |||
79 | Deferred bonus | |||
80 | Performance shares | |||
82 | Pension | |||
83 | Remuneration committee | |||
84 | Shareholder engagement | |||
84 | External appointments | |||
84 | Historical data and statistics | |||
85 | Directors shareholdings | |||
88
|
|
|||
90
|
|
Remuneration policy
Throughout this report, the word policy refers to the directors remuneration policy approved by shareholders at the companys annual general meeting on 10 April 2014. As shown below, BPs strategy is reflected in the measures adopted by the committee in 2016 for the executive directors and the metrics and targets are designed to assess performance against that strategy. Net investment (organic) has been removed as a measure for 2016. The same measures and targets are used for the wider management. A summary of the policy is located on pages 88-89 and the full policy is available at bp.com/remuneration and is set out in the BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2013. The committee has again reviewed the terms of the executive directors remuneration and confirmed
that malus and clawback provisions exist in all terms save the cash element of the annual bonus. It will consider this on the next occasion that it reviews the remuneration policy. Separate sections of this report contain information pertaining to executive and non-executive directors. The remuneration of executive directors is set by the remuneration committee under delegated powers from the board. The committee makes a recommendation to the board for the remuneration of the chairman. The remuneration of non-executive directors is set by the board based on a recommendation from the chairman, the group chief executive and the company secretary.
Strategic priorities
|
2016 bonus and equity plans supporting BPs strategic priorities |
|||
76 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Total remuneration summary 2015
The table below shows the total remuneration received by executive directors in 2015 and reflects the following:
Salary no increases were granted for 2015, in line with the group-wide salary freeze. The last increase was in July 2014.
Annual bonus the key focus for 2015 was safe and reliable operations, delivery of strong operating cash flow relative to plan and major projects within the year. This resulted in a final overall group score of 1.70 but limited to 1.50 for executive directors .
Deferred bonus 2012 deferred bonus was conditional on safety and environmental sustainability performance over the period 2013 through to 2015. There was strong and consistent delivery against this hurdle and 2012 deferred and matching shares vested in full .
Performance shares vesting was based one third on relative total shareholder return (TSR), one third on operating cash flow and one third on strategic imperatives including safety and operational risk (S&OR), relative reserves replacement ratio (RRR) and major project delivery « . TSR performance was third amongst the oil majors. There was strong performance related to operating cash flow and the strategic imperatives. On a preliminary assessment 77.6% of the 2013-2015 award is expected to vest .
Pension pension figures reflect the UK requirements to show 20 times the increase in accrued pension over the year for defined benefit plans, as well as the company match to retirement savings plans and any cash paid in lieu. The UK requirement overstates the true increase in value of Bob Dudleys US pension (see page 82 for explanation).
Single figure table of remuneration of executive directors in 2015 (audited)
Remuneration is reported in the currency received by the individual
Bob Dudley | Dr Brian Gilvary | |||||||||||||||
thousand | thousand | |||||||||||||||
Annual remuneration | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Salary |
$1,854 | $1,827 | £732 | £721 | ||||||||||||
Annual cash bonus a |
$1,391 | $1,005 | £549 | £396 | ||||||||||||
Benefits |
$119 | $114 | £53 | £51 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$3,364 | $2,946 | £1,334 | £1,168 | ||||||||||||
Vested equity | ||||||||||||||||
Deferred bonus and match b |
$2,603 | $3,401 | £1,272 | £0 | ||||||||||||
Performance shares |
$7,116 | c | $7,020 | d | £2,223 | c | £2,185 | d | ||||||||
Total |
$9,719 | $10,421 | £3,495 | £2,185 | ||||||||||||
Total remuneration |
$13,083 | $13,367 | £4,829 | £3,353 | ||||||||||||
Pension | ||||||||||||||||
Pension and retirement savings value increase e |
$6,519 | $3,023 | £0 | £21 | ||||||||||||
Cash in lieu of future accrual |
N/A | N/A | £256 | £252 | ||||||||||||
Total including pension |
$19,602 | $16,390 | £5,085 | £3,626 |
a | This reflects the amount of bonus paid in cash with the deferred portion as set out in the conditional equity table below. |
b | Value of vested deferred bonus and matching shares. The amounts reported for 2015 relate to the 2012 annual bonus deferred over three years, which vested on 9 February 2016 at the market price of £3.34 for ordinary shares and $28.95 for ADSs and include re-invested dividends on shares vested. The amounts reported for 2014 relate to the 2011 annual bonus. |
c | Represents the assumed vesting of shares in 2016 following the end of the relevant performance period, based on a preliminary assessment of performance achieved under the rules of the plan and includes re-invested dividends on shares vested. In accordance with UK regulations, the vesting price of the assumed vesting is the average market price for the fourth quarter of 2015 which was £3.72 for ordinary shares and $33.81 for ADSs. The final vesting will be confirmed by the committee in second quarter 2016 and provided in the 2016 Directors remuneration report. |
d | In accordance with UK regulations, in the 2014 single figure table, the performance outcome value was based on an estimated vesting at an assumed share price of £4.27 for ordinary shares and $40.74 for ADSs. In May 2015, after the external data became available, the committee reviewed the relative reserves replacement ratio position and assessed that the group was in first place relative to the other oil majors. This resulted in an adjustment to the final vesting from 60.5% to 63.8%. On 7 May 2015, 167,824 ADSs for Bob Dudley and 478,090 shares for Brian Gilvary vested at prices of $41.83 and £4.57 respectively. The 2014 values for the total vesting have increased by $628,746 for Bob Dudley and £280,827 for Brian Gilvary. |
e | Represents (1) the annual increase net of inflation in accrued pension multiplied by 20 as prescribed by UK regulations, and (2) in the case of Bob Dudley only, the aggregate value of the company match under his US retirement savings arrangements. Full details are set out on page 82. In Bob Dudleys case, the 2014 amount has been restated to reflect the revised disclosure of Mr Dudleys participation in the US retirement savings arrangements. |
Conditional equity to vest in future years, subject to performance
Bob Dudley | Dr Brian Gilvary | |||||||||||||||||
Deferred bonus in respect of bonus year | 2015 | a | 2014 | 2015 | a | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Total deferred bonus |
Value (thousand) |
$2,781 | $2,010 | £1,097 | £793 | |||||||||||||
Total deferred converted to shares |
Shares | 551,784 | 294,108 | 318,042 | 176,576 | |||||||||||||
Total matched shares |
Shares | 551,784 | 294,108 | 318,042 | 176,576 | |||||||||||||
Vesting date |
Feb 2019 | Feb 2018 | Feb 2019 | Feb 2018 | ||||||||||||||
Release date b |
Feb 2022 | Feb 2021 | Feb 2022 | Feb 2021 | ||||||||||||||
Performance share element | 2015-2017 | 2014-2016 | 2015-2017 | 2014-2016 | ||||||||||||||
Potential maximum shares |
1,501,770 | 1,304,922 | 685,246 | 605,544 | ||||||||||||||
Vesting date |
Feb 2018 | Feb 2017 | Feb 2018 | Feb 2017 | ||||||||||||||
Release date |
Feb 2021 | Feb 2020 | Feb 2021 | Feb 2020 |
a | It is anticipated that the 2015 deferred bonus award will be made in May 2016. |
b | Deferred shares are released at vesting with the exception of matched shares which normally have a further three-year retention period. |
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 77 |
Total remuneration in more depth
The committee, in seeking a fair outcome for pay, has for many years sought to ensure that variable pay is based primarily on true underlying performance and is not driven by factors over which the directors have no control. Accordingly, the committee normalizes for changes in oil and gas price and refining margins. Other factors such as major divestments and
contributions to the Gulf of Mexico restoration made in the year are also taken into consideration. In the light of the substantial drop in the price of oil during the three-year plan, the committee has been focused on ensuring that its approach to normalization has been consistent with our previous approach.
|
Base salary
No increases were granted to executive directors for 2015, in line with the group-wide salary freeze, therefore the 2015 salaries remained unchanged from 1 July 2014: $1,854,000 for Bob Dudley and £731,500 for Dr Brian Gilvary.
2016 implementation
The committee reviewed executive directors salaries in January 2016. Given the continuing low oil price environment, no increases will be applied to executive directors salaries for 2016.
Benefits
Executive directors received car-related benefits, security assistance, insurance and medical benefits.
|
Framework
The committee determined performance measures and their weightings for the 2015 annual bonus at the beginning of the performance year. The 2015 bonus plan was set in the context of the groups strategy and short-term imperatives. It focused on two key priorities: safety and value. Targets for each measure were challenging but realistic and were set in the context of the current price and industry environment. Targets for the value measures were based upon the annual plan. Threshold and maximum were set on a linear scale around the target.
Continued improvement in safety performance remains a key focus area and a group priority, particularly given the need to simplify the business. Safety made up 30% of total bonus. Safety measures included loss of primary containment, tier 1 process safety events « and recordable injury frequency. Challenging targets were set, both to build on the improving trend of the last three years and to continue to reduce the number of safety events.
a Adjusted in accordance with the treatment of the LOPC KPI on page 20. Full LOPC is 235.
b Recordable injury frequency excludes biofuels.
78 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Value measures made up 70% of total bonus. In order to simplify and reflect both the current short-term imperatives and the 2015 priorities in the groups annual plan, the number of value measures was reduced from six in 2014 to five in 2015. These measures were more heavily weighted on operating cash flow and underlying replacement cost profit. The economic environment was taken into account by looking at capital and cost discipline and these were reflected through two measures net investment (organic) and corporate and functional cost management. As in previous years, delivery of major projects remained a key focus area.
Bob Dudley and Dr Brian Gilvarys annual bonus was based 100% on these group-wide measures. Under the policy, one third of the total bonus is paid in cash. A director is required to defer a further third in BP shares and the final third is paid either in cash or voluntarily deferred in BP shares at the individuals election. Deferred shares are matched on a one-for-one basis, and both deferred and matched shares vest after three years depending on an assessment by the committee of safety and environmental sustainability over the three-year period.
2015 outcomes
In January 2016, the committee considered the groups performance during 2015 against the measures and targets set out in the 2015 annual cash bonus table.
As the table reflects, BP had an excellent year for safety and operational performance in a difficult environment.
The companys decision in late 2014 to plan for a lower for longer oil price meant that the leadership acted early and decisively to respond to the low oil price environment. Strong and continually improving safety standards have led to higher reliability and improved operations, contributing directly to better financial outcomes. Cost reduction and net investment have been managed so as not to compromise future growth. Major projects have been delivered on time, improving forthcoming performance.
Safety performance was again very encouraging, resulting in maximum scores for all three measures tier 1 process safety events, loss of primary containment and recordable injury frequency.
Operating cash flow for the company was $19.1 billion, well ahead of the boards approved plan of the target of $17.2 billion. This target was normalized upwards since the actual oil price during the year was higher than original plan assumptions. Underlying replacement cost profit of $5.9 billion was also significantly ahead of the target of $4.2 billion, again normalized similar to the above. Through greater simplification and efficiency across all functions, corporate and functional costs were reduced by 17.6% against a targeted reduction of 5.9%. Capital discipline was demonstrated through a reduction in the net investment (organic) of 27% against a planned reduction of 18%. Four major projects were successfully delivered in 2015, as planned.
Based on these results, the overall group performance score was 1.91. The committee, as is its normal practice, considered this result in the context of the performance of the group, shareholder feedback, input from the board and other committees, as well as the circumstances in the wider environment. Overall, management delivered very well in terms of what they could control. The committee agreed with the group chief executives view that the dramatic dynamics in the market during the year also needed to be recognized. He proposed a lower score and the committee agreed that this reflected a balanced assessment of the year. A final group score of 1.70 was agreed and applied to BPs wider management group. In the case of executive directors, our approved policy limits bonus to a group score of 1.50.
The overall annual bonus for executive directors was determined by multiplying the reduced score of 1.5 by the on-target bonus level of 150% of salary. Both Bob Dudley and Dr Brian Gilvary deferred two thirds of their 2015 annual bonus. As a result Bob Dudleys and Dr Brian Gilvarys bonuses, including the portion deferred, are shown below.
Annual bonus summary
Overall bonus | Paid in cash | Deferred in BP shares | ||||||||||
Bob Dudley |
$4,171,500 | $1,390,500 | $2,781,000 | |||||||||
Dr Brian Gilvary |
£1,645,875 | £548,625 | £1,097,250 |
2016 implementation
For 2016, 100% of Bob Dudleys and Dr Brian Gilvarys bonus will be based on group results.
For the 2016 annual bonus the committee will continue to focus on the two overall themes of safety and value. Safety will continue to have a 30% weight in the overall bonus plan. The value measures are key to short-term performance within the group and will have an overall weight of 70%.
Continued improvement in safety remains a group priority and is fully reflected in the measures. As in 2015, the safety targets are anchored on a realistic and achievable improvement from the average of the previous three years.
The value measures have been decreased from 5 in 2015 to 4 in 2016, increasing the weight on operating cash flow and underlying replacement cost profit and removing the net investment measure. Targets for each measure are challenging but realistic and have been set in the context of the current environment. As usual they will be normalized at year end to reflect changes in oil and gas price and refining margins.
Safety and value targets will be disclosed retrospectively in the 2016 remuneration report to the extent that they are no longer considered commercially sensitive. The full set of 2016 short-term measures are set out in the diagram on page 76.
|
2015 outcomes
Both Bob Dudley and Dr Brian Gilvary deferred two thirds of their 2012 annual bonus in accordance with the terms of the policy then in place.
The three-year performance period concluded at the end of 2015. The committee reviewed safety and environmental sustainability performance over this period and sought the input of the safety, ethics and environment assurance committee (SEEAC). Over the three-year period 2013-15 safety performance showed steady improvement on a range of measures. All performance hurdles were met and the group-wide operating management system « is now sufficiently embedded throughout the organization to continue driving improvement in environmental as well as safety areas.
Following the committees review, full vesting of the deferred and matched shares for the 2012 deferred bonus was approved, as shown in the following table (as well as in the single figure table on page 77).
2012 deferred bonus vesting
Name |
|
Shares
deferred |
|
|
Vesting
agreed |
|
|
Total shares
including dividends |
|
|
Total
value at vesting |
|
||||
Bob Dudley |
458,760 | 100% | 539,424 | $2,602,721 | ||||||||||||
Dr Brian Gilvary |
315,260 | 100% | 380,905 | £1,272,223 |
Details of the deferred bonus awards made to the executive directors in early 2015, in relation to 2014 annual bonuses, were set out in last years report. A summary of these awards is included on page 86.
2016 implementation
The committee has determined that the safety and environmental sustainability hurdle will continue to apply to shares deferred from the 2015 bonus. All matched shares that vest in 2019 will, after sufficient shares have been sold to pay tax, be subject to an additional three-year retention period before being released to the individual in 2022. This further reinforces long-term shareholder alignment and the nature of the groups business.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 79 |
|
Framework
Performance shares were conditionally awarded to each executive director in 2013. Maximum awards under the policy were granted representing five-and-a-half-times salary for Bob Dudley and four-times salary for Dr Brian Gilvary. Vesting of these awards was subject to delivering targets set over the three-year performance period.
One third of the award was based on relative total shareholder return (TSR), one third on operating cash flow and one third on three strategic imperatives: relative reserves replacement ratio (RRR), safety and operational risk (S&OR) and major projects delivery, all equally weighted. Performance against each of these measures was designed to be aligned with group strategy and key performance indicators (KPIs). Some measures appear in both the annual cash bonus and performance shares scorecards as they serve to track in-year performance as well as growth/improvement over a three-year period.
Relative TSR represents the change in value of a BP shareholding between the average of the fourth quarter of 2012 and the fourth quarter of 2015 compared to other oil majors (dividends are re-invested). RRR represents organic reserves added over the three-year performance period divided by the reserves extracted. This ratio is ranked against like-for-like organic RRR for other oil major peers.
The 2013-15 comparator group for relative TSR (33.3% weight) and relative RRR (11.1% weight) was Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell and Total. The number of conditional shares that would vest for each of the relative performance measures for first, second and third place was set at the start of 2013 and equals 100%, 70% and 35% respectively. This reflects the approved rules applicable to the 2013-2015 plan. No shares would vest for fourth or fifth place.
Operating cash flow represented a further one third of the award. BPs approved policy specifically states that: operating cash flow has been identified as a core measure of strategic performance of the company. Targets reflected agreed plans and normal operating assumptions.
For S&OR, improvement targets were set. For major project delivery, the committee set a number of projects expected to be delivered over three years. In reviewing project delivery the committee reviews the cost and any delays to the original schedule.
2015 outcomes
The committee considered the performance of the group over the three-year period of the plan and the specific achievements against each of the targets set for the measures. The results are summarized in the table below.
Relative TSR, representing a third of the award, was in third place versus the comparator group resulting in 35% vesting. Consequently 11.7% of the overall shares for this measure will vest. The significant weight associated with this measure aligns the actual value delivered to executive directors with that to shareholders.
Operating cash flow represented a further one third of the award. In considering measures and targets for performance share awards BP has historically adopted a normalized or like-for-like approach reflecting changes in oil and gas prices. This avoids windfall gains or penal losses in periods of extreme volatility. The target set in 2013 for 2015 operating cash flow was $35 billion based on the plan assumptions relating to oil and gas price and refining margins at that time. This target was reviewed at the start of 2015 in the light of divestments and plan assumptions relating to environment, principally oil and gas prices and refining margins. Consistent with its previous practice the committee normalized the operating cash flow target. Based on the above assumptions, adjusting for major divestments and for contributions to the Gulf of Mexico restoration made in the year, the operating cash flow target was set at $17.7 billion. A scale comprising threshold and maximum figures was set around the target on a linear basis. The actual 2015 operating cash flow was $19.1 billion, equalling the maximum set and resulting in vesting of 33.3% of all shares for this measure.
a | This represents a preliminary assessment. |
b | Adjusted in accordance with the treatment of the LOPC KPI on page 20. Full LOPC is 235. |
c | RIF excludes biofuels. |
80 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Strategic imperatives represented the final third. These included relative RRR, S&OR, and major project delivery, each weighted equally.
Preliminary assessment of BPs relative RRR indicated a positive outcome with an expected first place amongst the comparator group. The final ranking will be determined once the actual results for 2015 have been published by other comparator companies. For the purposes of this report, and in accordance with the UK regulations, first place has been assumed. Any adjustment to this will be reported in next years annual report on remuneration. Based on a provisional first place assessment, 11.1% of the overall shares for this measure are expected to vest.
S&OR has improved significantly over the 2013-15 period, with a downward trend over the period in tier 1 process safety events (53%), recordable injury frequency (30%), and loss of primary containment (28%). The operating management system continued to mature and there has been a continual rise in assessed conformance levels. Consequently 10.4% of overall shares will vest for the safety measures.
Fifteen major projects were delivered over the three years well ahead of plan and resulting in full vesting for this measure. As a result, 11.1% of overall shares will vest.
As in past years, the committee also considered the true underlying operational and financial performance of the group during the period and whether any other factors should be taken into account. Following this review, the committee assessed that a preliminary 77.6% vesting was a fair reflection of the overall performance, pending confirmation of the relative reserves replacement ratio result. This will result in the vesting shown in the table below.
The vested shares for current executive directors are subject to a further three-year retention period before they will be released to the individuals in 2019.
2013-2015 performance shares preliminary outcome
|
Shares
awarded |
|
|
Shares vested
including dividends |
|
|
Value of
vested shares |
|
||||
Bob Dudley |
1,384,026 | 1,262,868 | $7,116,261 | |||||||||
Dr Brian Gilvary |
637,413 | 597,628 | £2,223,176 |
2012-2014 final outcomes confirmation
Last year it was reported that the committee had made a preliminary assessment of second place for the relative RRR in the 2012-2014 performance shares element. In May 2015 the committee reviewed the results for all comparator companies as published in their reports and
accounts and assessed that BP was in first place relative to other oil majors and that the full 11.1% of shares would vest for this performance measure as opposed to 7.8% for second place. This resulted in a final overall vesting of 63.8% (versus 60.5% as preliminarily outlined in the 2014 report) for the entire award. This change is reflected in the single figure table on page 77.
2016 implementation
Consistent with application of policy and our previous approach, shares are expected to be awarded in March 2016 to the maximum value allowed under the policy, five-and-a-half-times salary for Bob Dudley and four-times salary for Dr Brian Gilvary. These will be awarded under the performance share element of the EDIP and will be subject to a three-year performance period. Those shares that vest are subject, after tax, to an additional three-year retention period. The 2016-2018 performance share element will be assessed over three years based on the following measures: relative TSR (one third); cumulative operating cash flow (one third); and strategic imperatives (one third) including relative RRR; S∨ and major project delivery, all equally weighted.
These measures continue to be aligned with BPs strategic priorities of safe, reliable and compliant operations, competitive project execution, disciplined financial choices and sources of future growth. The committee agreed targets and scales for measures that will be used to assess performance at the end of the three-year performance period and these will be disclosed retrospectively, to the extent that they are no longer commercially sensitive.
For S&OR the committee will study annual results based on outcomes from the annual cash bonus for the period 2016 to 2018 and make a determination of the three-year outcome. Similarly for operating cash flow the committee, at the end of the period, will make a determination of the three-year outcome by comparing the cumulative actual annual results against the cumulative actual annual targets.
TSR and RRR will be assessed on a relative basis compared with the other oil majors Chevron, ExxonMobil, Shell and Total with the following vesting schedule.
Relative performance ranking | ||
BPs ranking place versus oil majors |
Vesting percentage for each
relative performance measure |
|
First |
100% | |
Second |
80% | |
Third |
25% | |
Fourth or fifth |
Nil |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 81 |
|
Framework
Executive directors are eligible to participate in group pension schemes that apply in their home countries which follow national norms in terms of structure and levels.
US pension and retirement savings
Bob Dudley participates in US pension and retirement savings plans. These involve a combination of tax-qualified and non-qualified plans, consistent with applicable US tax regulations. Benefits payable under non-qualified plans are unfunded and therefore paid from corporate assets.
Details of the pension plans in which Mr Dudley participates are as follows. The BP Retirement Accumulation Plan (US pension plan) is a US tax-qualified plan that features a cash-balance formula and includes grandfathering provisions under final average pay formulas for certain employees of companies acquired by BP (including Amoco) who participated in these predecessor company pension plans. The TNK-BP Supplemental Retirement Plan is based on the same calculation as the benefit under the US pension plan but reflecting service and earnings at TNK-BP.
The BP Excess Compensation (Retirement) Plan (ECRP) provides a supplemental benefit which is the difference between (1) the benefit accrual under the US Pension Plan and the TNK-BP Supplemental Retirement Plan without regard to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) compensation limit (including for this purpose base salary, cash bonus and bonus deferred into a compulsory or voluntary award under the deferred matching element of the EDIP), and (2) the actual benefit payable under the US pension plan and the TNK-BP Supplemental Retirement Plan, applying the IRS compensation limit. The benefit calculation under the Amoco formula includes a reduction of 5% per year if taken before age 60.
The BP Supplemental Executive Retirement Benefit Plan (SERB) is a non-qualified supplemental plan which provides a benefit of 1.3% of final average earnings (including, for this purpose, base salary plus cash bonus and bonus deferred into a compulsory or voluntary award under the deferred matching element of the EDIP) for each year of service (without regard for tax limits) less benefits paid under all other BP (US) qualified and non-qualified pension arrangements. The benefit payable under SERB is unreduced at age 60 but reduced by 5% per year if separation occurs before age 60.
Mr Dudley also participates in US retirement savings plans on the same terms as those available to all eligible US employees. These savings plans provide benefits to employees on or after their retirement. These are provided through a tax-qualified plan and a non-qualified plan. The BP Employee Savings Plan (ESP) is a US tax-qualified section 401(k) plan to which both Mr Dudley and BP contribute within limits set by US tax regulations. The BP Excess Compensation (Savings) Plan (ECSP) is a non-qualified, unfunded plan under which BP provides a notional match in respect of eligible pay that exceeds the limit under the ESP. Mr Dudley does not contribute to the ECSP. For the purposes of the plans, eligible pay includes base salary, cash bonus and bonus deferred into a compulsory or voluntary award under the deferred matching element of the EDIP. Under both plans, participants are entitled to make investment elections, involving an investment in the relevant fund in the case of the ESP and a notional investment (the return on which would be delivered by BP under its unfunded commitment) in the case of the ECSP.
These retirement savings arrangements pre-date Mr Dudleys appointment as a director and are grandfathered as a pre-27 June 2012 obligation for the purposes of the remuneration policy approved by shareholders in April 2014. The cost to the company has been fully provided for within the amounts disclosed for pensions and other post-retirement benefits in the financial statements. Previous remuneration reports have not disclosed details of Mr Dudleys participation in these arrangements but following a review, BP has determined that disclosure of the companys contribution to these plans should now be included in this report.
UK pension
Dr Brian Gilvary participates in a UK final salary pension plan in respect of service prior to 1 April 2011. This plan provides a pension relating to length of pensionable service and final pensionable salary. The disclosure of total pension includes any cash in lieu of additional accrual that is paid to individuals in the UK plan who have exceeded the annual allowance or lifetime allowance under UK regulations, and have chosen to cease future accrual of pension. Dr Gilvary falls into this category and in 2015 received a cash supplement of 35% of salary in lieu of future service accrual.
In the event of retirement before age 60, the following early retirement terms would apply:
| On retirement between 55 and 60, in circumstances approved by the committee, an immediate unreduced pension in respect of the proportion of benefit for service up to 30 November 2006, and subject to such reduction as the plan actuary certifies in respect of the period of service after 1 December 2006. The plan actuary has, to date, applied a reduction of 3% per annum for each year retirement precedes 60 in respect of the period of service from 1 December 2006 up to the leaving date; however a greater reduction can be applied in other circumstances. |
| On leaving before age 55, in circumstances approved by the committee, a deferred pension payable from 55 or later, with early retirement terms if it is paid before 60 as set out above. |
Irrespective of this, on leaving in circumstances of total incapacity, an immediate unreduced pension is payable from his leaving date.
2015 outcomes
Mr Dudley participates in the US pension and retirement savings plans described above. The pension plans are aimed at an overall accrual rate of 1.3% of final earnings (which include salary and bonus), for each year of service. In 2015, Mr Dudleys accrued pension increased, net of inflation, by $309,000. This increase has been reflected in the single figure table on page 77 by multiplying it by a factor of 20 in accordance with the requirements of the UK regulations (giving $6,176,000). The committee will continue to make the required disclosures in accordance with the UK regulations; however, given the issues and differences set out below, it would note that around 14 would be a typical annuity factor in the US compared with the factor of 20 upon which the UK regulations are based.
In relation to the retirement savings plans, Mr Dudley made pre-tax and post-tax contributions in 2015 to the ESP totalling $26,500 (2014: $26,000). For 2015 the total value of BP matching contributions in respect of Mr Dudley to the ESP and notional matching contributions to the ECSP was $341,000, 7% of eligible pay (2014: $374,000, 7% of eligible pay). After adjusting for investment gains within his accumulating unfunded ECSP account (aggregating the unfunded arrangements relating to his overall service with BP and TNK-BP) the amount included in the single figure table on page 77 is $343,000. The equivalent figure for 2014 has been restated (an increase of $427,000) to reflect the revised disclosure treatment.
Dr Gilvary participates in the UK pension arrangements described above. In 2015 Dr Gilvarys accrued pension did not increase and therefore net of inflation it reduced. In accordance with the requirements of the UK regulations, the value shown in the single figure table on page 77 is zero. He has exceeded the lifetime allowance under UK pension legislation and, in accordance with the policy, receives a cash supplement of 35% of salary, which has been separately identified in the single figure table on page 77.
The committee continues to keep under review the increase in the value of pension benefits for individual directors. There are significant differences in calculation of pensions between the UK and the US. US pension benefits are not subject to cost of living adjustments after retirement as they are in the UK.
82 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Members
|
||
Professor Dame Ann Dowling (chair) |
Member since July 2012; committee chair since May 2015 | |
Antony Burgmans |
Member since May 2009; committee chair from May 2011 to May 2015 | |
Alan Boeckmann |
Member since May 2015 | |
George David |
Member from May 2009 to April 2015 | |
Ian Davis |
Member since July 2010 | |
Andrew Shilston |
Member since May 2015 |
2015 was a year of transition for the committee as the membership evolved. Dame Ann Dowling took the chair from Antony Burgmans after the May meeting. George David stood down from the board in April, Alan Boeckmann and Andrew Shilston joined the committee.
Carl-Henric Svanberg and Bob Dudley attend meetings of the committee except for matters relating to their own remuneration. The group chief executive (GCE) is consulted on the remuneration of the other executive director and the executive team and on matters relating to the performance of the group. The group human resources director normally attends meetings of the committee, and other executives may attend relevant parts of those meetings. The committee consults other relevant committees of the board, for example the SEEAC, on issues relating to the exercise of its judgement or discretion.
Key tasks of the remuneration committee
| Determine the policy for the chairman and the executive directors (the policy) for inclusion in the remuneration policy for all directors as required by the regulations. |
| Review and determine as appropriate the terms of engagement, remuneration and termination of employment of the chairman and the executive directors in accordance with the policy, and be responsible for compliance with all remuneration issues relating to the chairman and the executive directors required by the regulations. |
| Prepare for the board an annual report to shareholders on the implementation of the policy, so far as it relates to the chairman and the executive directors, as required by the regulations. |
| Approve the principles of any equity plan for which shareholder approval is to be sought. |
| Approve the terms of the remuneration (including pension and termination arrangements) of the executive team as proposed by the GCE. |
| Approve changes to the design of remuneration as proposed by the GCE, for the group leaders of the company. |
| Monitor implementation of remuneration for group leaders to ensure alignment and proportionality. |
| Engage such independent consultants or other advisers as the committee may from time to time deem necessary, at the expense of the company. |
In these tasks, regulations means regulations made from time to time under the Companies Act 2006, the UK Corporate Governance Code adopted by the Financial Reporting Council and the UK Listing Authoritys Listing Rules in relation to the remuneration of directors of quoted companies.
Activities during the year
During the year, the committee met five times. Key discussions and decision items are shown in the table below.
Remuneration committee 2015 meetings
Jan | May | Jul | Sept | Dec | ||||||
Strategy and policy |
||||||||||
Review and approve directors remuneration report (DRR) for 2015 AGM |
||||||||||
Consider DRR votes from 2015 AGM |
||||||||||
Review committee tasks and operation |
||||||||||
Review of BP remuneration strategy |
||||||||||
Salary review |
||||||||||
Executive directors |
||||||||||
Executive team and leadership group |
||||||||||
Annual bonus |
||||||||||
Assess performance |
||||||||||
Determine bonus for 2014 |
||||||||||
Agree measures and targets for 2015 |
||||||||||
Review measures for 2016 |
||||||||||
Consider measures and targets for 2016 |
||||||||||
Long-term equity plan |
||||||||||
Assess performance |
||||||||||
Determine vesting of 2012-2014 plan |
||||||||||
Determine vesting of 2011 deferred bonus |
||||||||||
Agree measures, targets and awards |
||||||||||
for 2015-2017 plan |
||||||||||
Review measures for 2016-2018 plan |
||||||||||
Consider measures and targets |
||||||||||
for 2016-2018 plan |
||||||||||
Other items |
||||||||||
Review principles for target setting |
||||||||||
and disclosure |
||||||||||
Other issues as required |
Independence and advice
Independence
The board considers all committee members to be independent with no personal financial interest, other than as shareholders, in the committees decisions.
Advice
During 2015 David Jackson, the company secretary, who is employed by the company and reports to the chairman of the board, acted as secretary to the remuneration committee. The company secretary periodically reviews the independence of the committees advisers.
Gerrit Aronson, an independent consultant, is the committees independent adviser with experience of advising a number of companies in the UK and Europe. He is engaged directly by the committee. Advice and services on particular remuneration matters were also received from other external advisers appointed by the committee.
Willis Towers Watson provided information on the global remuneration market, principally for benchmarking purposes. Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP provided legal advice on specific compliance matters to the committee. Both firms provide other advice in their respective areas to the group.
Total fees or other charges (based on an hourly rate) paid in 2015 to the above advisers for the provision of remuneration advice to the committee as set out above (save in respect of legal advice) are as follows:
Gerrit Aronson £130,000
Willis Towers Watson £38,309
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 83 |
Committee review
The board evaluation process for 2015 included a separate questionnaire on the work of the remuneration committee. The results were analysed by an external consultant and discussed at the committees meeting in January 2016. As part of the broader external evaluation described elsewhere, any issues relating to the committee or its work were discussed by the board in January 2016.
The committee values its dialogue with major shareholders on remuneration matters. During the year, the committees chair and the company secretary held individual meetings with several larger shareholders to ascertain their views and discuss important aspects of the committees policy and its implementation. They also met key proxy advisers. These meetings supplemented a group meeting of major shareholders with all committee chairs and the chairman of the board which took place in March 2015, and a regular dialogue between the chairman and shareholders. Throughout the year this engagement provided the committee with an important and direct perspective of shareholder views and, together with the voting results on remuneration matters at the AGM, was considered when making decisions.
Against the background of the encouraging vote that had taken place at the April AGM and the dialogue with shareholders around the meeting, the committee has noted the shareholders support for the approach taken regarding retrospective disclosure of targets but notes they wish for still more.
Accordingly we have this year added additional retrospective disclosure on targets and scales for both annual bonus and long-term performance shares. During the year, Dame Ann Dowling met with a number of the larger shareholders and those who advise them. These have been constructive meetings and they will be built on in the current year, to aid the preparation of a revised remuneration policy for the chairman and the executive directors to be presented to shareholders at the AGM in 2017.
The boards annual report on remuneration was approved by shareholders at the 2015 AGM. The votes on the report are shown below.
2015 AGM directors remuneration report vote results
Year | % vote for | % vote against | Votes withheld | |||||||||
2015 |
88.8% | 11.2% | 305,297,190 |
The committees remuneration policy was approved by shareholders at the 2014 AGM. The votes on the policy are shown below.
2014 AGM directors remuneration policy vote results
Year | % vote for | % vote against | Votes withheld | |||||||||
2014 |
96.4% | 3.6% | 125,217,443 |
The shareholder approved policy now governs the remuneration of the directors for a period of three years expiring in 2017.
See bp.com/remuneration for a copy of the approved policy.
The board supports executive directors taking up appointments outside the company to broaden their knowledge and experience. Each executive director is permitted to accept one non-executive appointment, from which they may retain any fee. External appointments are subject to agreement by the chairman and reported to the board. Any external appointment must not conflict with a directors duties and commitments to BP. Details of appointments during 2015 are shown below.
Director | Appointee company |
Additional position held at appointee company |
Total fees | |||
Bob Dudley |
Rosneft a | Director | 0 |
a | Bob Dudley holds this appointment as a result of the companys shareholding in Rosneft. |
Historical data and statistics
Historical TSR performance
This graph shows the growth in value of a hypothetical £100 holding in BP p.l.c. ordinary shares over seven years, relative to a hypothetical £100 holding in the FTSE 100 Index of which the company is a constituent. The values of the hypothetical £100 holdings at the end of the seven-year period were £99.06 (2014: £107.45) and £190.42 (2014: £194.77) respectively.
84 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
History of CEO remuneration
Year | CEO |
|
Total
remuneration thousand |
a |
|
Annual bonus
% of maximum |
|
|
Performance
share vesting % of maximum |
|
||||||||
2009 |
Hayward | £6,753 | 89 | b | 17.5 | |||||||||||||
2010 c |
Hayward | £3,890 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Dudley | $8,057 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
2011 |
Dudley | $8,439 | 67 | 16.7 | ||||||||||||||
2012 |
Dudley | $9,609 | 65 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
2013 |
Dudley | $15,086 | 88 | 45.5 | ||||||||||||||
2014 |
Dudley | $16,390 | 73 | 63.8 | ||||||||||||||
2015 |
Dudley | $19,602 | 100 | 77.6 |
a | Total remuneration figures include pension. For Bob Dudley this has been restated since 2010 in accordance with the principles explained on page 82, to include the value of the companys contribution to his US retirement savings arrangements. The total figure is also affected by share vesting outcomes and these numbers represent the actual outcome for the periods up to 2011 or the adjusted outcome in subsequent years where a preliminary assessment of the performance for EDIP was made. For 2015, the preliminary assessment has been reflected. |
b | 2009 annual bonus did not have an absolute maximum and so is shown as a percentage of the maximum established in 2010. |
c | 2010 figures show full year total remuneration for both Tony Hayward and Bob Dudley, although Bob Dudley did not become CEO until October 2010. |
Relative importance of spend on pay (million)
a | Total remuneration reflects overall employee costs. See Financial statements Note 34 for further information. |
b | Capital investment reflects organic capital expenditure « . |
c | See Financial statements Note 30 for further information. |
d | Dividends includes both scrip dividends as well as those paid in cash. See Financial statements Note 9 for further information. |
Percentage change in CEO remuneration
Comparing 2015 to 2014 | Salary | Benefits | Bonus | |||||||||
% change in CEO remuneration |
1.5% | 4.4% | 38.4% | |||||||||
% change in comparator group remuneration | 0% | a | 0% | b | 27.9% |
a | The comparator group comprises some 31% of BPs global employee population being professional/managerial grades of employees based in the UK and US and employed on more readily comparable terms. |
b | There was no change in employee benefits level. |
Executive directors are required to develop a personal shareholding of five times salary within a reasonable period of time from appointment. It is the stated intention of the policy that executive directors build this level of personal shareholding primarily by retaining those shares that vest in the deferred bonus and performance share plans which are part of the EDIP. In assessing whether the requirement has been met, the committee takes account of the factors it considers appropriate, including promotions and vesting levels of these share plans, as well as any abnormal share price fluctuations. The table below shows the status of each of the executive directors in developing this level. These figures include the value as at 22 February 2016 from the directors interests shown below plus the assumed vesting of the 2013-2015 performance shares and is consistent with the figures reported in the single figure table on page 77.
Appointment date |
|
Value of current
shareholding |
|
|
% of policy
achieved |
|
||||||
Bob Dudley |
October 2010 | $12,478,540 | 135 | |||||||||
Dr Brian Gilvary |
January 2012 | £3,559,733 | 97 |
The committee is satisfied that all executive directors shareholdings meet the policy requirement.
The figures below indicate and include all beneficial and non-beneficial interests of each executive director of the company in shares of BP (or calculated equivalents) that have been disclosed to the company under the Disclosure and Transparency Rules (DTRs) as at the applicable dates.
Current directors |
|
Ordinary
shares or equivalents at 1 Jan 2015 |
|
|
Ordinary
shares or equivalents at 31 Dec 2015 |
|
|
Change from
31 Dec 2015 to 22 Feb 2016 |
|
|
Ordinary
shares or equivalents total at 22 Feb 2016 |
|
||||
Bob Dudley a |
738,858 | 1,554,198 | 285,366 | 1,839,564 | ||||||||||||
Dr Brian Gilvary | 545,217 | 903,856 | 201,710 | 1,105,566 |
a | Held as ADSs. |
The following table shows both the performance shares and the deferred bonus element awarded under the EDIP. These figures represent the maximum possible vesting levels. The actual number of shares/ADSs that vest will depend on the extent to which performance conditions have been satisfied over a three-year period.
Current directors |
|
Performance
shares at 1 Jan 2015 |
|
|
Performance
shares at 31 Dec 2015 |
|
|
Change from
31 Dec 2015 to 22 Feb 2016 |
|
|
Performance
shares total at 22 Feb 2016 |
|
||||
Bob Dudley a |
5,227,500 | 5,536,950 | (458,760 | ) | 5,078,190 | |||||||||||
Dr Brian Gilvary | 2,375,957 | 2,789,921 | (315,260 | ) | 2,474,661 |
a | Held as ADSs. |
At 22 February 2016, the following directors held the numbers of options under the BP group share option schemes over ordinary shares or their calculated equivalent set out below. None of these are subject to performance conditions. Additional details regarding these options can be found on page 87.
Current director | Options | |||
Dr Brian Gilvary |
504,191 |
No director has any interest in the preference shares or debentures of the company or in the shares or loan stock of any subsidiary company.
There are no directors or other members of senior management who own more than 1% of the ordinary shares in issue. At 22 February 2016, all directors and other members of senior management as a group held interests of 17,529,149 ordinary shares or their calculated equivalent, 8,761,779 performance shares or their calculated equivalent and 6,039,841 options over ordinary shares or their calculated equivalent under the BP group share option schemes. Senior management comprises members of the executive team. See pages 60-61 for further information.
« Defined on page 256. | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 85 |
Deferred shares (audited) a
Deferred share element interests | Interests vested in 2015 and 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Potential maximum deferred shares | ordinary | £ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance | Date of award of | At 1 Jan | Awarded | At 31 Dec | shares | Face value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonus year | Type | period | deferred shares | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | vested | Vesting date | of the award | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bob Dudley b |
2011 | Comp | 2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 109,206 | | | 126,444 | c | 11 Feb 2015 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol | 2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 109,206 | | | 126,444 | c | 11 Feb 2015 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 218,412 | | | 252,894 | c | 11 Feb 2015 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | Comp | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 114,690 | | 114,690 | 134,856 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 114,690 | | 114,690 | 134,856 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 229,380 | | 229,380 | 269,712 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | d | Comp | 2014-2016 | 12 Feb 2014 | 149,628 | | 149,628 | | | 728,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2014-2016 | 12 Feb 2014 | 149,628 | | 149,628 | | | 728,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | e | Comp | 2015-2017 | 11 Feb 2015 | | 147,054 | 147,054 | | | 655,861 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol | 2015-2017 | 11 Feb 2015 | | 147,054 | 147,054 | | | 655,861 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2015-2017 | 11 Feb 2015 | | 294,108 | 294,108 | | | 1,311,722 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Brian Gilvary |
2011 | DAB | f | 2012-2014 | 15 Mar 2012 | 73,624 | | | 84,491 | c | 15 Jan 2015 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | Comp | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 78,815 | | 78,815 | 95,226 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 78,815 | | 78,815 | 95,226 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 157,630 | | 157,630 | 190,453 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | d | Comp | 2014-2016 | 12 Feb 2014 | 96,653 | | 96,653 | | | 470,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2014-2016 | 12 Feb 2014 | 96,653 | | 96,653 | | | 470,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | e | Comp | 2015-2017 | 11 Feb 2015 | | 88,288 | 88,288 | | | 393,764 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol | 2015-2017 | 11 Feb 2015 | | 88,288 | 88,288 | | | 393,764 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2015-2017 | 11 Feb 2015 | | 176,576 | 176,576 | | | 787,529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Former executive directors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iain Conn |
2011 | Comp | 2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 80,652 | | | 95,196 | c | 11 Feb 2015 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol | 2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 80,652 | | | 95,196 | c | 11 Feb 2015 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 161,304 | | | 190,393 | c | 11 Feb 2015 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | Comp | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 80,648 | | 80,648 | 97,441 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 80,648 | | 80,648 | 97,441 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 107,531 | g | | 107,531 | g | 129,922 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | d | Comp | 2014-2016 | 12 Feb 2014 | 100,563 | | 100,563 | | | 489,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2014-2016 | 12 Feb 2014 | 33,521 | g | | 33,521 | g | | | 163,247 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Byron Grote b |
2011 | Comp | 2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 91,638 | | | 106,104 | c | 11 Feb 2015 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol | 2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 91,638 | | | 106,104 | c | 11 Feb 2015 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 91,638 | g | | | 106,104 | c | 11 Feb 2015 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2012 | Comp | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 97,278 | | 97,278 | 114,384 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vol | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 97,278 | | 97,278 | 114,384 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mat | 2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 32,424 | g | | 32,424 | g | 38,124 | c | 9 Feb 2016 | |
Comp = Compulsory.
Vol = Voluntary.
Mat = Matching.
DAB = Deferred Annual Bonus Plan.
a | Since 2010, vesting of the deferred shares has been subject to a safety and environmental sustainability hurdle, and this will continue. If the committee assesses that there has been a material deterioration in safety and environmental performance, or there have been major incidents, either of which reveal underlying weaknesses in safety and environmental management, then it may conclude that shares should vest only in part, or not at all. In reaching its conclusion, the committee will obtain advice from the SEEAC. There is no identified minimum vesting threshold level. |
b | Bob Dudley and Dr Byron Grote received awards in the form of ADSs. The above numbers reflect calculated equivalents in ordinary shares. One ADS is equivalent to six ordinary shares. |
c | Represents vestings of shares made at the end of the relevant performance period based on performance achieved under rules of the plan and includes reinvested dividends on the shares vested. The market price of each share used to determine the total value at vesting on the vesting dates of 15 January 2015, 11 February 2015 and 9 February 2016 were £3.93, £4.46 and £3.34 respectively and for ADSs on 11 February 2015 and 9 February 2016 were $40.35 and $28.95 respectively. |
d | The face value has been calculated using the market price of ordinary shares on 12 February 2014 of £4.87. |
e | The market price at closing of ordinary shares on 11 February 2015 was £4.46 and for ADSs was $40.35. The sterling value has been used to calculate the face value. |
f | Dr Brian Gilvary was granted the shares under the DAB prior to his appointment as a director. The vesting of these shares is not subject to further performance conditions and he receives deferred shares at each scrip payment date as part of his election choice. |
g | All matching shares have been pro-rated to reflect actual service during the performance period and these figures have been used to calculate the face value. |
86 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Performance shares (audited)
Share element interests | Interests vested in 2014 and 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Potential maximum performance shares a | Number of | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ordinary | £ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance | Date of award of | At 1 Jan | Awarded | At 31 Dec | shares | Face value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
period | performance shares | 2015 | 2015 | 2015 | vested | Vesting date | of the award | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bob Dudley b |
2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 1,343,712 | | | 1,006,944 | c | 7 May 2015 | d | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 1,384,026 | | 1,384,026 | 1,262,868 | c | May 2016 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014-2016 | e | 12 Feb 2014 | 1,304,922 | | 1,304,922 | | | 6,354,970 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015-2017 | e | 11 Feb 2015 | | 1,501,770 | 1,501,770 | | | 6,697,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Brian Gilvary |
2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 624,434 | | | 478,090 | c | 7 May 2015 | d | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 637,413 | | 637,413 | 597,628 | c | May 2016 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014-2016 | e | 12 Feb 2014 | 605,544 | | 605,544 | | | 2,948,999 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015-2017 | e | 11 Feb 2015 | | 685,246 | 685,246 | | | 3,056,197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Former executive directors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iain Conn |
2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 660,633 | | | 505,805 | c | 7 May 2015 | d | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 463,126 | | 463,126 | 434,220 | c | May 2016 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014-2016 | e | 12 Feb 2014 | 220,043 | | 220,043 | f | | | 1,071,609 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Byron Grote b |
2012-2014 | 08 Mar 2012 | 414,468 | | | 310,596 | c | 7 May 2015 | d | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013-2015 | 11 Feb 2013 | 142,278 | | 142,278 | f | 129,816 | c | May 2016 | |
a | For awards under the 2012-2014, 2013-2015, 2014-2016 and 2015-2017 plans, performance conditions are measured one third on TSR against ExxonMobil, Shell, Total and Chevron; one third on operating cash flow; and one third on a balanced scorecard of strategic imperatives. Each performance period ends on 31 December of the third year. There is no identified overall minimum vesting threshold level but to comply with UK regulations a value of 44.4%, which is conditional on the TSR, operating cash flow and each of the strategic imperatives reaching the minimum threshold, has been calculated. |
b | Bob Dudley and Dr Byron Grote received awards in the form of ADSs. The above numbers reflect calculated equivalents in ordinary shares. One ADS is equivalent to six ordinary shares. |
c | Represents vestings of shares made at the end of the relevant performance period based on performance achieved under rules of the plan and includes reinvested dividends on the shares vested. The market price of each share at the vesting date of 7 May 2015 was £4.57 and for ADSs was $41.83. For the assumed vestings dated May 2016 a price of £3.72 per ordinary share and $33.81 per ADS has been used. These are the average prices from the fourth quarter of 2015. |
d | The 2012-2014 award vested on 7 May 2015, which resulted in an increase in value at vesting of £297,110 for Iain Conn and $193,922 for Byron Grote. Details for Bob Dudley and Brian Gilvary can be found in the single figure table on page 77. |
e | The market price at closing of ordinary shares on 12 February 2014 was £4.87 and for ADSs was $48.38, and on 11 February 2015 was £4.46 and for ADSs was $40.35. |
f | Potential maximum of performance shares element has been pro-rated to reflect actual service during the performance period and these figures have been used to calculate the face value. |
Share interests in share option plans (audited)
Option type | At 1 Jan 2015 | Granted | Exercised | At 31 Dec 2015 | Option price |
|
Market price at
date of exercise |
|
|
Date from which
first exercisable |
|
Expiry date | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dr Brian Gilvary |
BP 2011 | 500,000 | | | 500,000 | £3.72 | | 07 Sep 2014 | 07 Sep 2021 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SAYE | 4,191 | | | 4,191 | £3.68 | | 01 Sep 2016 | 28 Feb 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Former executive directors |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Iain Conn |
SAYE | 2,005 | a | | 2,005 | | £3.68 | £4.47 | 01 Jan 2015 | 30 Jun 2015 |
The closing market prices of an ordinary share and of an ADS on 31 December 2015 were £3.54 and $31.26 respectively.
During 2015 the highest market prices were £4.84 and $43.60 respectively and the lowest market prices were £3.23 and $29.38 respectively.
BP 2011 = BP 2011 plan. These options were granted to Dr Brian Gilvary prior to his appointment as a director and are not subject to performance conditions.
SAYE = Save As You Earn all employee share scheme.
a | In accordance with the rules, potential maximum shares were pro-rated with a shorter exercise period and the option was exercised on 11 June 2015. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 87 |
This is a summary of the remuneration policy as set out in the 2014 directors remuneration report and approved by shareholders.
88 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 89 |
This section of the directors remuneration report completes the directors annual report on remuneration with details for the chairman and non-executive directors (NEDs). The boards remuneration policy for the NEDs was approved at the 2014 AGM. This policy was implemented during 2014. There has been no variance of the fees or allowances for the chairman and the NEDs during 2015.
Chairman
|
||
Basic fee
|
||
Remuneration is in the form of cash fees, payable monthly. Remuneration practice is consistent with recognized best practice standards for a chairmans remuneration and as a UK-listed company, the quantum and structure of the chairmans remuneration will primarily be compared against best UK practice.
|
||
Operation and opportunity
|
||
The quantum and structure of chairmans remuneration is reviewed annually by the remuneration committee, which makes a recommendation to the board.
|
||
Benefits and expenses
|
||
The chairman is provided with support and reasonable travelling expenses.
|
||
Operation and opportunity
|
||
The chairman is provided with an office and full time secretarial and administrative support in London and a contribution to an office and secretarial support in Sweden. A chauffeured car is provided in London, together with security assistance. All reasonable travelling and other expenses (including any relevant tax) incurred in carrying out his duties is reimbursed.
|
||
The maximum remuneration for non-executive directors is set in accordance with the Articles of Association.
|
Fee structure
The table below shows the fee structure for the chairman in place since 1 May 2013. He is not eligible for committee chairmanship and membership fees or intercontinental travel allowance. He has the use of a fully maintained office for company business, a chauffeured car and security advice in London. He receives a contribution to an office and secretarial support as appropriate to his needs in Sweden.
|
Fee level
£ thousand |
|
||
Chairman |
785 |
The table below shows the fees paid for the chairman for the year ending 31 December 2015.
2015 remuneration (audited)
£ thousand | Fees | Benefits a | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Carl-Henric Svanberg |
785 | 785 | 38 | 37 | 823 | 822 |
a | Benefits include travel and other expenses relating to the attendance at board and other meetings. Amounts disclosed have been grossed up using a tax rate of 45%, where relevant, as an estimation of tax due. |
Chairmans interests
The figures below include all the beneficial and non-beneficial interests of the chairman in shares of BP (or calculated equivalents) that have been disclosed under the DTRs as at the applicable dates. The chairmans holdings represented as a percentage against policy achieved are 944%.
Chairman |
|
Ordinary
shares or equivalents at 1 Jan 2015 |
|
|
Ordinary
shares or equivalents at 31 Dec 2015 |
|
|
Change from
31 Dec 2015 to 22 Feb 2016 |
|
|
Ordinary
shares or equivalents total at 22 Feb 2016 |
|
||||
Carl-Henric Svanberg |
1,076,695 | 2,076,695 | | 2,076,695 |
90 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Non-executive directors
|
||
Basic fee
|
||
Remuneration is in the form of cash fees, payable monthly. Remuneration practice is consistent with recognized best practice standards for non- executive directors remuneration and as a UK-listed company, the quantum and structure of NED director remuneration will primarily be compared against best UK practice.
|
||
Operation
|
||
The quantum and structure of NEDs remuneration is reviewed by the chairman, the group chief executive and the company secretary who make a recommendation to the board; the NEDs do not vote on their own remuneration. Remuneration for non-executive directors is reviewed annually.
|
||
Committee fees and allowances
|
||
Intercontinental allowance
|
||
The NEDs receive an allowance to reflect the global nature of the Companys business. The allowance is payable for transatlantic or equivalent intercontinental travel for the purpose of attending a board or committee meeting or site visits.
|
||
Operation
|
||
The allowance will be paid in cash following each event of intercontinental travel.
|
||
Committee chairmanship fee
|
||
Those NEDs who chair a committee receive an additional fee. The committee chairmanship fee reflects the additional time and responsibility in chairing a committee of the board, including the time spent in preparation and liaising with management.
|
||
Committee membership fee
|
||
NEDs receive a fee for each committee on which they sit other than as a chairman. The committee membership fee reflects the time spent in attending and preparation for a committee of the board.
|
||
Operation
|
||
Fees for committee chairmanship and membership are determined annually and paid in cash.
|
||
The senior independent director (SID)
|
||
In the light of the SIDs broader role and responsibilities, the SID is paid a single fee and is entitled to other fees relating to committees whether as chair or member.
|
||
Operation
|
||
The fee for the SID will be determined from time to time, and is paid in cash monthly.
|
||
Benefits and expenses
|
||
The NEDs are provided with support and reasonable travelling expenses.
|
||
Operation
|
||
NEDs are reimbursed for all reasonable travelling and subsistence expenses (including any relevant tax) incurred in carrying out their duties.
|
||
Professional fees
|
||
Fees will be reimbursed in the form of cash, payable following assistance.
|
||
Operation
|
||
The reimbursement of professional fees incurred by non-executive directors based outside the UK in connection with advice and assistance on UK tax compliance matters.
|
||
The maximum remuneration for non-executive directors is set in accordance with the Articles of Association.
|
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 91 |
Fee structure
The table below shows the fee structure for non-executive directors from 1 May 2014:
a | The senior independent director is eligible for committee chairmanship fees and intercontinental travel allowance plus any committee membership fees. |
b | Committee chairmen do not receive an additional membership fee for the committee they chair. |
c | For members of the audit, geopolitical, Gulf of Mexico, SEEA and remuneration committees. |
2015 remuneration (audited)
£ thousand | Fees | Benefits a | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | 2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Paul Anderson |
177 | 175 | 28 | 48 | 205 | 223 | ||||||||||||||||||
Alan Boeckmann |
178 | 70 | 14 | 17 | 192 | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||
Admiral Frank Bowman |
177 | 165 | 12 | 17 | 189 | 182 | ||||||||||||||||||
Antony Burgmans |
149 | 150 | 19 | 9 | 168 | 159 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cynthia Carroll |
127 | 125 | 68 | 66 | 195 | 191 | ||||||||||||||||||
George David b |
60 | 185 | 15 | 18 | 75 | 203 | ||||||||||||||||||
Ian Davis |
145 | 150 | 3 | 5 | 148 | 155 | ||||||||||||||||||
Professor Dame Ann |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dowling c |
141 | 140 | 1 | 11 | 142 | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brendan Nelson |
125 | 125 | 11 | 16 | 136 | 141 | ||||||||||||||||||
Phuthuma Nhleko |
167 | 150 | 11 | 9 | 178 | 159 | ||||||||||||||||||
Paula Rosput Reynolds d |
93 | | 56 | | 149 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Sir John Sawers d |
85 | | 0 | | 85 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Andrew Shilston |
165 | 150 | 3 | 8 | 168 | 158 |
a | Benefits include travel and other expenses relating to the attendance at board and other meetings. Amounts disclosed have been grossed up using a tax rate of 45%, where relevant, as an estimation of tax due. |
b | Retired on 16 April 2015. |
c | In addition, Professor Dame Ann Dowling received £25,000 for chairing and being a member of the BP technology advisory council. |
d | Appointed on 14 May 2015. |
Non-executive director interests
The figures below indicate and include all the beneficial and non-beneficial interests of each non-executive director of the company in shares of BP (or calculated equivalents) that have been disclosed to the company under the DTRs as at the applicable dates.
|
Ordinary shares
or equivalents at 1 Jan 2015 |
|
|
Ordinary shares
or equivalents at 31 Dec 2015 |
|
|
Change from
31 Dec 2015 to 22 Feb 2016 |
|
|
Ordinary shares
or equivalents total at 22 Feb 2016 |
|
|
Value of
current shareholding |
|
|
% of policy
achieved |
|
|||||||
Paul Anderson |
30,000 | a | 30,000 | a | | 30,000 | a | $151,500 | 110 | |||||||||||||||
Alan Boeckmann |
43,890 | a | 44,772 | a | | 44,772 | a | $226,099 | 164 | |||||||||||||||
Admiral Frank Bowman |
16,320 | a | 24,864 | a | | 24,864 | a | $125,563 | 91 | |||||||||||||||
Antony Burgmans |
10,156 | 10,156 | | 10,156 | £36,257 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cynthia Carroll |
10,500 | a | 10,500 | a | | 10,500 | a | $53,025 | 39 | |||||||||||||||
George David b |
579,000 | a | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Ian Davis |
22,420 | 23,854 | | 23,854 | £85,159 | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||
Professor Dame Ann Dowling |
22,320 | 22,320 | | 22,320 | £79,682 | 89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brendan Nelson |
11,040 | 11,040 | | 11,040 | £39,413 | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Phuthuma Nhleko |
| | | | | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Paula Rosput Reynolds c |
| 52,200 | a | | 52,200 | a | $263,610 | 192 | ||||||||||||||||
Sir John Sawers c |
| 13,528 | | 13,528 | £48,295 | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Andrew Shilston |
15,000 | 15,000 | | 15,000 | £53,550 | 45 |
a | Held as ADSs. |
b | Retired on 16 April 2015. |
c | Appointed on 14 May 2015. |
Past directors
Sir Ian Prosser (who retired as a non-executive director of BP in April 2010) was appointed as a director and non-executive chairman of BP Pension Trustees Limited on 1 October 2010. During 2015, he received £100,000 for this role.
This directors remuneration report was approved by the board and signed on its behalf by David J Jackson, company secretary on 4 March 2016.
92 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
This page does not form part of BPs Annual Report on Form 20-F as filed with the SEC.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 93 |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
This page does not form part of BPs Annual Report on Form 20-F as filed with the SEC.
94 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
101 | Consolidated financial statements of the BP group |
107 | Notes on financial statements |
1. | Significant accounting policies | 107 | ||||
2. | Significant event Gulf of Mexico oil spill | 117 | ||||
3. | Noncurrent assets held for sale | 122 | ||||
4. | Disposals and impairment | 122 | ||||
5. | Segmental analysis | 124 | ||||
6. | Income statement analysis | 128 | ||||
7. | Exploration expenditure | 129 | ||||
8. | Taxation | 129 | ||||
9. | Dividends | 131 | ||||
10. | Earnings per ordinary share | 131 | ||||
11. | Property, plant and equipment | 133 | ||||
12. | Capital commitments | 133 | ||||
13. | Goodwill | 134 | ||||
14. | Intangible assets | 135 | ||||
15. | Investments in joint ventures | 136 | ||||
16. | Investments in associates | 136 | ||||
17. | Other investments | 139 | ||||
18. | Inventories | 139 | ||||
19. | Trade and other receivables | 139 | ||||
20. | Valuation and qualifying accounts | 139 | ||||
21. | Trade and other payables | 140 |
22. | Provisions | 140 | ||||
23. | Pensions and other post-retirement benefits | 140 | ||||
24. | Cash and cash equivalents | 146 | ||||
25. | Finance debt | 146 | ||||
26. | Capital disclosures and analysis of changes in net debt | 147 | ||||
27. | Operating leases | 147 | ||||
28. | Financial instruments and financial risk factors | 148 | ||||
29. | Derivative financial instruments | 151 | ||||
30. | Called-up share capital | 155 | ||||
31. | Capital and reserves | 156 | ||||
32. | Contingent liabilities | 159 | ||||
33. | Remuneration of senior management and non-executive directors | 160 | ||||
34. | 161 | |||||
35. | Auditors remuneration | 161 | ||||
36. | Subsidiaries, joint arrangements and associates | 162 | ||||
37. | Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries | 163 |
169 | Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 95 |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
This page does not form part of BPs Annual Report on Form 20-F as filed with the SEC.
96 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
This page does not form part of BPs Annual Report on Form 20-F as filed with the SEC.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 97 |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
This page does not form part of BPs Annual Report on Form 20-F as filed with the SEC.
98 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
This page does not form part of BPs Annual Report on Form 20-F as filed with the SEC.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 99 |
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
This page does not form part of BPs Annual Report on Form 20-F as filed with the SEC.
100 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Consolidated financial statements of the BP group
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The board of directors and shareholders of BP p.l.c.
We have audited the accompanying group balance sheets of BP p.l.c. as of 31 December 2015 and 31 December 2014, and the related group income statement, group statement of comprehensive income, group statement of changes in equity and group cash flow statement for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the group financial position of BP p.l.c. at 31 December 2015 and 31 December 2014, and the group results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2015, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union and International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), BP p.l.c.s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2015, based on criteria established in the UK Financial Reporting Councils Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting and our report dated 4 March 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
London, United Kingdom
4 March 2016
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 101 |
Consolidated financial statements of the BP group
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The board of directors and shareholders of BP p.l.c.
We have audited BP p.l.c.s internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2015, based on criteria established in the UK Financial Reporting Councils Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting. BP p.l.c.s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Managements report on internal control on page 244. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, BP p.l.c. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2015, based on the UK Financial Reporting Councils Guidance.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the group balance sheets of BP p.l.c. as of 31 December 2015 and 2014, and the related group income statement, group statement of comprehensive income, group statement of changes in equity and group cash flow statement for each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 2015, and our report dated 4 March 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
London, United Kingdom
4 March 2016
Consent of independent registered public accounting firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference of our reports dated 4 March 2016, with respect to the group financial statements of BP p.l.c., and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of BP p.l.c., included in this Annual Report and Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2015 in the following Registration Statements:
Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-208478 and 333-208478-01) of BP Capital Markets p.l.c. and BP p.l.c.; and Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-67206, 333-79399, 333-103924, 333-123482, 333-123483, 333-131583, 333-131584, 333-132619, 333-146868, 333-146870, 333-146873, 333-173136, 333-177423, 333-179406, 333-186462, 333-186463, 333-199015, 333-200794, 333-200795, 333-207188 and 333-207189) of BP p.l.c.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
London, United Kingdom
4 March 2016
102 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
For the year ended 31 December | $ million | |||||||||||||||||
Note | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
5 | 222,894 | 353,568 | 379,136 | ||||||||||||||
Earnings from joint ventures after interest and tax |
15 | (28 | ) | 570 | 447 | |||||||||||||
Earnings from associates after interest and tax |
16 | 1,839 | 2,802 | 2,742 | ||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
6 | 611 | 843 | 777 | ||||||||||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
4 | 666 | 895 | 13,115 | ||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other income |
225,982 | 358,678 | 396,217 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases |
18 | 164,790 | 281,907 | 298,351 | ||||||||||||||
Production and manufacturing expenses a |
37,040 | 27,375 | 27,527 | |||||||||||||||
Production and similar taxes |
5 | 1,036 | 2,958 | 7,047 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
5 | 15,219 | 15,163 | 13,510 | ||||||||||||||
Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
4 | 1,909 | 8,965 | 1,961 | ||||||||||||||
Exploration expense |
7 | 2,353 | 3,632 | 3,441 | ||||||||||||||
Distribution and administration expenses |
11,553 | 12,266 | 12,611 | |||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
(7,918 | ) | 6,412 | 31,769 | ||||||||||||||
Finance costs a |
6 | 1,347 | 1,148 | 1,068 | ||||||||||||||
Net finance expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
23 | 306 | 314 | 480 | ||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
(9,571 | ) | 4,950 | 30,221 | ||||||||||||||
Taxation a |
8 | (3,171 | ) | 947 | 6,463 | |||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
(6,400 | ) | 4,003 | 23,758 | ||||||||||||||
Attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders |
(6,482 | ) | 3,780 | 23,451 | ||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
82 | 223 | 307 | |||||||||||||||
(6,400 | ) | 4,003 | 23,758 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings per share cents |
||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders |
||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
10 | (35.39 | ) | 20.55 | 123.87 | |||||||||||||
Diluted |
10 | (35.39 | ) | 20.42 | 123.12 |
a | See Note 2 for information on the impact of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill on these income statement line items. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 103 |
Group statement of comprehensive income a
For the year ended 31 December | $ million | |||||||||||||||||
Note | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
(6,400 | ) | 4,003 | 23,758 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences |
(4,119 | ) | (6,838 | ) | (1,608 | ) | ||||||||||||
Exchange gains (losses) on translation of foreign operations reclassified to gain or loss on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
23 | 51 | 22 | |||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale investments marked to market |
1 | (1 | ) | (172 | ) | |||||||||||||
Available-for-sale investments reclassified to the income statement |
| 1 | (523 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges marked to market |
29 | (178 | ) | (155 | ) | (2,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash flow hedges reclassified to the income statement |
29 | 249 | (73 | ) | 4 | |||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges reclassified to the balance sheet |
29 | 22 | (11 | ) | 17 | |||||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
(814 | ) | (2,584 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income tax relating to items that may be reclassified |
8 | 257 | 147 | 147 | ||||||||||||||
(4,559 | ) | (9,463 | ) | (4,137 | ) | |||||||||||||
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||||||
Remeasurements of the net pension and other post-retirement benefit liability or asset |
23 | 4,139 | (4,590 | ) | 4,764 | |||||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
(1 | ) | 4 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
Income tax relating to items that will not be reclassified |
8 | (1,397 | ) | 1,334 | (1,521 | ) | ||||||||||||
2,741 | (3,252 | ) | 3,245 | |||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
(1,818 | ) | (12,715 | ) | (892 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
(8,218 | ) | (8,712 | ) | 22,866 | |||||||||||||
Attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders |
(8,259 | ) | (8,903 | ) | 22,574 | |||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
41 | 191 | 292 | |||||||||||||||
(8,218 | ) | (8,712 | ) | 22,866 |
a | See Note 31 for further information. |
Group statement of changes in equity a
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share
capital and capital reserves |
Treasury
shares |
Foreign
currency translation reserve |
Fair
value reserves |
Profit and
loss account |
BP
shareholders equity |
Non-
controlling interests |
Total
equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2015 |
43,902 | (20,719 | ) | (3,409 | ) | (897 | ) | 92,564 | 111,441 | 1,201 | 112,642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
| | | | (6,482 | ) | (6,482 | ) | 82 | (6,400 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| | (3,858 | ) | 74 | 2,007 | (1,777 | ) | (41 | ) | (1,818 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | (3,858 | ) | 74 | (4,475 | ) | (8,259 | ) | 41 | (8,218 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends b |
| | | | (6,659 | ) | (6,659 | ) | (91 | ) | (6,750 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments, net of tax |
| 755 | | | (99 | ) | 656 | | 656 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share of equity-accounted entities changes in equity, net of tax |
| | | | 40 | 40 | | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions involving non-controlling interests |
| | | | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 20 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
43,902 | (19,964 | ) | (7,267 | ) | (823 | ) | 81,368 | 97,216 | 1,171 | 98,387 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2014 |
43,656 | (20,971 | ) | 3,525 | (695 | ) | 103,787 | 129,302 | 1,105 | 130,407 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
| | | | 3,780 | 3,780 | 223 | 4,003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| | (6,934 | ) | (202 | ) | (5,547 | ) | (12,683 | ) | (32 | ) | (12,715 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | (6,934 | ) | (202 | ) | (1,767 | ) | (8,903 | ) | 191 | (8,712 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends b |
| | | | (5,850 | ) | (5,850 | ) | (255 | ) | (6,105 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchases of ordinary share capital |
| | | | (3,366 | ) | (3,366 | ) | | (3,366 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments, net of tax |
246 | 252 | | | (313 | ) | 185 | | 185 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share of equity-accounted entities changes in equity, net of tax |
| | | | 73 | 73 | | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions involving non-controlling interests |
| | | | | | 160 | 160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2014 |
43,902 | (20,719 | ) | (3,409 | ) | (897 | ) | 92,564 | 111,441 | 1,201 | 112,642 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2013 |
43,513 | (21,054 | ) | 5,128 | 1,775 | 89,184 | 118,546 | 1,206 | 119,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
| | | | 23,451 | 23,451 | 307 | 23,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| | (1,603 | ) | (2,470 | ) | 3,196 | (877 | ) | (15 | ) | (892 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | (1,603 | ) | (2,470 | ) | 26,647 | 22,574 | 292 | 22,866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends b |
| | | | (5,441 | ) | (5,441 | ) | (469 | ) | (5,910 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchases of ordinary share capital |
| | | | (6,923 | ) | (6,923 | ) | | (6,923 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments, net of tax |
143 | 83 | | | 247 | 473 | | 473 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Share of equity-accounted entities changes in equity, net of tax |
| | | | 73 | 73 | | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transactions involving non-controlling interests |
| | | | | | 76 | 76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2013 |
43,656 | (20,971 | ) | 3,525 | (695 | ) | 103,787 | 129,302 | 1,105 | 130,407 |
a | See Note 31 for further information. |
b | See Note 9 for further information. |
104 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
At 31 December | $ million | |||||||||||||
Note | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
11 | 129,758 | 130,692 | |||||||||||
Goodwill |
13 | 11,627 | 11,868 | |||||||||||
Intangible assets |
14 | 18,660 | 20,907 | |||||||||||
Investments in joint ventures |
15 | 8,412 | 8,753 | |||||||||||
Investments in associates |
16 | 9,422 | 10,403 | |||||||||||
Other investments |
17 | 1,002 | 1,228 | |||||||||||
Fixed assets |
178,881 | 183,851 | ||||||||||||
Loans |
529 | 659 | ||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
19 | 2,216 | 4,787 | |||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
29 | 4,409 | 4,442 | |||||||||||
Prepayments |
1,003 | 964 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
8 | 1,545 | 2,309 | |||||||||||
Defined benefit pension plan surpluses |
23 | 2,647 | 31 | |||||||||||
191,230 | 197,043 | |||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||
Loans |
272 | 333 | ||||||||||||
Inventories |
18 | 14,142 | 18,373 | |||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
19 | 22,323 | 31,038 | |||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
29 | 4,242 | 5,165 | |||||||||||
Prepayments |
1,838 | 1,424 | ||||||||||||
Current tax receivable |
599 | 837 | ||||||||||||
Other investments |
17 | 219 | 329 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
24 | 26,389 | 29,763 | |||||||||||
70,024 | 87,262 | |||||||||||||
Assets classified as held for sale |
3 | 578 | | |||||||||||
70,602 | 87,262 | |||||||||||||
Total assets |
261,832 | 284,305 | ||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables |
21 | 31,949 | 40,118 | |||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
29 | 3,239 | 3,689 | |||||||||||
Accruals |
6,261 | 7,102 | ||||||||||||
Finance debt |
25 | 6,944 | 6,877 | |||||||||||
Current tax payable |
1,080 | 2,011 | ||||||||||||
Provisions |
22 | 5,154 | 3,818 | |||||||||||
54,627 | 63,615 | |||||||||||||
Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale |
3 | 97 | | |||||||||||
54,724 | 63,615 | |||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||||||||
Other payables |
21 | 2,910 | 3,587 | |||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
29 | 4,283 | 3,199 | |||||||||||
Accruals |
890 | 861 | ||||||||||||
Finance debt |
25 | 46,224 | 45,977 | |||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
8 | 9,599 | 13,893 | |||||||||||
Provisions |
22 | 35,960 | 29,080 | |||||||||||
Defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan deficits |
23 | 8,855 | 11,451 | |||||||||||
108,721 | 108,048 | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
163,445 | 171,663 | ||||||||||||
Net assets |
98,387 | 112,642 | ||||||||||||
Equity |
||||||||||||||
BP shareholders equity |
31 | 97,216 | 111,441 | |||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
31 | 1,171 | 1,201 | |||||||||||
Total equity |
31 | 98,387 | 112,642 |
C-H Svanberg Chairman
R W Dudley Group Chief Executive
4 March 2016
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 105 |
For the year ended 31 December | $ million | |||||||||||||||||
Note | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
(9,571 | ) | 4,950 | 30,221 | ||||||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile profit (loss) before taxation to net cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||||||||||||
Exploration expenditure written off |
7 | 1,829 | 3,029 | 2,710 | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
5 | 15,219 | 15,163 | 13,510 | ||||||||||||||
Impairment and (gain) loss on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
4 | 1,243 | 8,070 | (11,154 | ) | |||||||||||||
Earnings from joint ventures and associates |
(1,811 | ) | (3,372 | ) | (3,189 | ) | ||||||||||||
Dividends received from joint ventures and associates |
1,614 | 1,911 | 1,391 | |||||||||||||||
Interest receivable |
(247 | ) | (276 | ) | (314 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest received |
176 | 81 | 173 | |||||||||||||||
Finance costs |
6 | 1,347 | 1,148 | 1,068 | ||||||||||||||
Interest paid |
(1,080 | ) | (937 | ) | (1,084 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net finance expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
23 | 306 | 314 | 480 | ||||||||||||||
Share-based payments |
321 | 379 | 297 | |||||||||||||||
Net operating charge for pensions and other post-retirement benefits, less contributions and benefit payments for unfunded plans |
23 | (592 | ) | (963 | ) | (920 | ) | |||||||||||
Net charge for provisions, less payments |
11,792 | 1,119 | 1,061 | |||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in inventories |
3,375 | 10,169 | (1,193 | ) | ||||||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in other current and non-current assets |
6,796 | 3,566 | (2,718 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in other current and non-current liabilities |
(9,328 | ) | (6,810 | ) | (2,932 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income taxes paid |
(2,256 | ) | (4,787 | ) | (6,307 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
19,133 | 32,754 | 21,100 | |||||||||||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure |
(18,648 | ) | (22,546 | ) | (24,520 | ) | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
23 | (131 | ) | (67 | ) | |||||||||||||
Investment in joint ventures |
(265 | ) | (179 | ) | (451 | ) | ||||||||||||
Investment in associates |
(1,312 | ) | (336 | ) | (4,994 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposals of fixed assets |
4 | 1,066 | 1,820 | 18,115 | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposals of businesses, net of cash disposed |
4 | 1,726 | 1,671 | 3,884 | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from loan repayments |
110 | 127 | 178 | |||||||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(17,300 | ) | (19,574 | ) | (7,855 | ) | ||||||||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||||||||
Net issue (repurchase) of shares |
| (4,589 | ) | (5,358 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from long-term financing |
8,173 | 12,394 | 8,814 | |||||||||||||||
Repayments of long-term financing |
(6,426 | ) | (6,282 | ) | (5,959 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt |
473 | (693 | ) | (2,019 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in non-controlling interests |
(5 | ) | 9 | 32 | ||||||||||||||
Dividends paid |
||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders |
9 | (6,659 | ) | (5,850 | ) | (5,441 | ) | |||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
(91 | ) | (255 | ) | (469 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(4,535 | ) | (5,266 | ) | (10,400 | ) | ||||||||||||
Currency translation differences relating to cash and cash equivalents |
(672 | ) | (671 | ) | 40 | |||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(3,374 | ) | 7,243 | 2,885 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
29,763 | 22,520 | 19,635 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
26,389 | 29,763 | 22,520 |
106 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions
Authorization of financial statements and statement of compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards
The consolidated financial statements of the BP group for the year ended 31 December 2015 were approved and signed by the group chief executive and chairman on 4 March 2016 having been duly authorized to do so by the board of directors. BP p.l.c. is a public limited company incorporated and domiciled in England and Wales. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), IFRS as adopted by the European Union (EU) and in accordance with the provisions of the UK Companies Act 2006. IFRS as adopted by the EU differs in certain respects from IFRS as issued by the IASB. The differences have no impact on the groups consolidated financial statements for the years presented. The significant accounting policies and accounting judgements, estimates and assumptions of the group are set out below.
Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis and in accordance with IFRS and IFRS Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) interpretations issued and effective for the year ended 31 December 2015. The accounting policies that follow have been consistently applied to all years presented.
The consolidated financial statements are presented in US dollars and all values are rounded to the nearest million dollars ($ million), except where otherwise indicated.
Significant accounting policies: use of judgements, estimates and assumptions
Inherent in the application of many of the accounting policies used in preparing the financial statements is the need for BP management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Actual outcomes could differ from the estimates and assumptions used. The accounting judgements and estimates that could have a significant impact on the results of the group are set out in boxed text below, and should be read in conjunction with the information provided in the Notes on financial statements. The areas requiring the most significant judgement and estimation in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are: accounting for interests in other entities; oil and natural gas accounting, including the estimation of reserves; the recoverability of asset carrying values; derivative financial instruments, including the application of hedge accounting; provisions and contingencies, in particular provisions and contingencies related to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill; pensions and other post-retirement benefits; and taxation.
Basis of consolidation
The group financial statements consolidate the financial statements of BP p.l.c. and its subsidiaries drawn up to 31 December each year. Subsidiaries are consolidated from the date of their acquisition, being the date on which the group obtains control, and continue to be consolidated until the date that such control ceases. The financial statements of subsidiaries are prepared for the same reporting year as the parent company, using consistent accounting policies. Intra-group balances and transactions, including unrealized profits arising from intra-group transactions, have been eliminated. Unrealized losses are eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Non-controlling interests represent the equity in subsidiaries that is not attributable, directly or indirectly, to BP shareholders.
Interests in other entities
Goodwill
Goodwill is initially measured as the excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred, the amount recognized for any non-controlling interest and the acquisition-date fair values of any previously held interest in the acquiree over the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. At the acquisition date, any goodwill acquired is allocated to each of the cash-generating units, or groups of cash-generating units, expected to benefit from the combinations synergies. Following initial recognition, goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill arising on business combinations prior to 1 January 2003 is stated at the previous carrying amount under UK generally accepted accounting practice, less subsequent impairments.
Goodwill may also arise upon investments in joint ventures and associates, being the surplus of the cost of investment over the groups share of the net fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities. Such goodwill is recorded within the corresponding investment in joint ventures and associates.
Interests in joint arrangements
The results, assets and liabilities of joint ventures are incorporated in these financial statements using the equity method of accounting as described below.
Certain of the groups activities, particularly in the Upstream segment, are conducted through joint operations. BP recognizes, on a line-by-line basis in the consolidated financial statements, its share of the assets, liabilities and expenses of these joint operations incurred jointly with the other partners, along with the groups income from the sale of its share of the output and any liabilities and expenses that the group has incurred in relation to the joint operation.
Interests in associates
The results, assets and liabilities of associates are incorporated in these financial statements using the equity method of accounting as described below.
Significant estimate or judgement: accounting for interests in other entities
Judgement is required in assessing the level of control obtained in a transaction to acquire an interest in another entity; depending upon the facts and circumstances in each case, BP may obtain control, joint control or significant influence over the entity or arrangement. Transactions which give BP control of a business are business combinations. If BP obtains joint control of an arrangement, judgement is also required to assess whether the arrangement is a joint operation or a joint venture. If BP has neither control nor joint control, it may be in a position to exercise significant influence over the entity, which is then accounted for as an associate.
Since 21 March 2013, BP has owned 19.75% of the voting shares of OJSC Oil Company Rosneft (Rosneft), a Russian oil and gas company. The Russian federal government, through its investment company OJSC Rosneftegaz, owned 69.5% of the voting shares of Rosneft at 31 December 2015. BP uses the equity method of accounting for its investment in Rosneft because under IFRS it is considered to have significant influence. Significant influence is defined as the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control. IFRS identifies several indicators that may provide evidence of significant influence, including representation on the board of directors of the investee and participation in policy-making processes. BPs group chief executive, Bob Dudley, has been a member of the board of directors of
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 107 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Rosneft since 2013 and he is a member of the Rosneft boards Strategic Planning Committee. During 2015, a second BP-nominated director, Guillermo Quintero, was elected to the Rosneft board. BP also holds the voting rights at general meetings of shareholders conferred by its 19.75% stake in Rosneft. In managements judgement, the group has significant influence over Rosneft, as defined by the relevant accounting standard, and the investment is, therefore, accounted for as an associate. BPs share of Rosnefts oil and natural gas reserves is included in the estimated net proved reserves of equity-accounted entities.
The equity method of accounting
Under the equity method, the investment is carried on the balance sheet at cost plus post-acquisition changes in the groups share of net assets of the entity, less distributions received and less any impairment in value of the investment. Loans advanced to equity-accounted entities that have the characteristics of equity financing are also included in the investment on the group balance sheet. The group income statement reflects the groups share of the results after tax of the equity-accounted entity, adjusted to account for depreciation, amortization and any impairment of the equity-accounted entitys assets based on their fair values at the date of acquisition. The group statement of comprehensive income includes the groups share of the equity-accounted entitys other comprehensive income. The groups share of amounts recognized directly in equity by an equity-accounted entity is recognized directly in the groups statement of changes in equity.
Financial statements of equity-accounted entities are prepared for the same reporting year as the group. Where material differences arise, adjustments are made to those financial statements to bring the accounting policies used into line with those of the group.
Unrealized gains on transactions between the group and its equity-accounted entities are eliminated to the extent of the groups interest in the equity-accounted entity.
The group assesses investments in equity-accounted entities for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If any such indication of impairment exists, the carrying amount of the investment is compared with its recoverable amount, being the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. If the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, the investment is written down to its recoverable amount.
The group ceases to use the equity method of accounting from the date on which it no longer has joint control over the joint venture or significant influence over the associate, or when the interest becomes classified as an asset held for sale.
Segmental reporting
The groups operating segments are established on the basis of those components of the group that are evaluated regularly by the group chief executive, BPs chief operating decision maker, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as the groups accounting policies described in this note, except that IFRS requires that the measure of profit or loss disclosed for each operating segment is the measure that is provided regularly to the chief operating decision maker. For BP, this measure of profit or loss is replacement cost profit before interest and tax which reflects the replacement cost of inventories sold in the period and is arrived at by excluding inventory holding gains and losses from profit. Replacement cost profit for the group is not a recognized measure under IFRS. For further information see Note 5.
Foreign currency translation
In individual subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates, transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded in the functional currency of those entities at the spot exchange rate on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated into the functional currency at the spot exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Any resulting exchange differences are included in the income statement, unless hedge accounting is applied. Non-monetary assets and liabilities, other than those measured at fair value, are not retranslated subsequent to initial recognition.
In the consolidated financial statements, the assets and liabilities of non-US dollar functional currency subsidiaries, joint ventures, associates, and related goodwill, are translated into US dollars at the spot exchange rate on the balance sheet date. The results and cash flows of non-US dollar functional currency subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are translated into US dollars using average rates of exchange. In the consolidated financial statements, exchange adjustments arising when the opening net assets and the profits for the year retained by non-US dollar functional currency subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates are translated into US dollars are taken to a separate component of equity and reported in the statement of comprehensive income. Exchange gains and losses arising on long-term intra-group foreign currency borrowings used to finance the groups non-US dollar investments are also taken to other comprehensive income. On disposal or partial disposal of a non-US dollar functional currency subsidiary, joint venture or associate, the related cumulative exchange gains and losses recognized in equity are reclassified to the income statement.
Non-current assets held for sale
Non-current assets and disposal groups classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.
Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amounts will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the asset or disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets. Management must be committed to the sale, which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification as held for sale, and actions required to complete the plan of sale should indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are not depreciated or amortized once classified as held for sale.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets, other than goodwill, include expenditure on the exploration for and evaluation of oil and natural gas resources, computer software, patents, licences and trademarks and are stated at the amount initially recognized, less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses.
Intangible assets acquired separately from a business are carried initially at cost. An intangible asset acquired as part of a business combination is measured at fair value at the date of acquisition and is recognized separately from goodwill if the asset is separable or arises from contractual or other legal rights.
Intangible assets with a finite life, other than capitalized exploration and appraisal costs as described below, are amortized on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives. For patents, licences and trademarks, expected useful life is the shorter of the duration of the legal agreement and economic useful life, and can range from three to 15 years. Computer software costs generally have a useful life of three to five years.
108 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
The expected useful lives of assets are reviewed on an annual basis and, if necessary, changes in useful lives are accounted for prospectively.
Oil and natural gas exploration, appraisal and development expenditure
Oil and natural gas exploration, appraisal and development expenditure is accounted for using the principles of the successful efforts method of accounting as described below.
Licence and property acquisition costs
Exploration licence and leasehold property acquisition costs are capitalized within intangible assets and are reviewed at each reporting date to confirm that there is no indication that the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount. This review includes confirming that exploration drilling is still under way or planned or that it has been determined, or work is under way to determine, that the discovery is economically viable based on a range of technical and commercial considerations, and sufficient progress is being made on establishing development plans and timing. If no future activity is planned, the remaining balance of the licence and property acquisition costs is written off. Lower value licences are pooled and amortized on a straight- line basis over the estimated period of exploration. Upon recognition of proved reserves and internal approval for development, the relevant expenditure is transferred to property, plant and equipment.
Exploration and appraisal expenditure
Geological and geophysical exploration costs are recognized as an expense as incurred. Costs directly associated with an exploration well are initially capitalized as an intangible asset until the drilling of the well is complete and the results have been evaluated. These costs include employee remuneration, materials and fuel used, rig costs and payments made to contractors. If potentially commercial quantities of hydrocarbons are not found, the exploration well costs are written off as a dry hole. If hydrocarbons are found and, subject to further appraisal activity, are likely to be capable of commercial development, the costs continue to be carried as an asset. If it is determined that development will not occur then the costs are expensed.
Costs directly associated with appraisal activity undertaken to determine the size, characteristics and commercial potential of a reservoir following the initial discovery of hydrocarbons, including the costs of appraisal wells where hydrocarbons were not found, are initially capitalized as an intangible asset. When proved reserves of oil and natural gas are determined and development is approved by management, the relevant expenditure is transferred to property, plant and equipment.
Development expenditure
Expenditure on the construction, installation and completion of infrastructure facilities such as platforms, pipelines and the drilling of development wells, including service and unsuccessful development or delineation wells, is capitalized within property, plant and equipment and is depreciated from the commencement of production as described below in the accounting policy for property, plant and equipment.
Significant estimate or judgement: oil and natural gas accounting
The determination of whether potentially economic oil and natural gas reserves have been discovered by an exploration well is usually made within one year of well completion, but can take longer, depending on the complexity of the geological structure. Exploration wells that discover potentially economic quantities of oil and natural gas and are in areas where major capital expenditure (e.g. an offshore platform or a pipeline) would be required before production could begin, and where the economic viability of that major capital expenditure depends on the successful completion of further exploration work in the area, remain capitalized on the balance sheet as long as additional exploration or appraisal work is under way or firmly planned.
It is not unusual to have exploration wells and exploratory-type stratigraphic test wells remaining suspended on the balance sheet for several years while additional appraisal drilling and seismic work on the potential oil and natural gas field is performed or while the optimum development plans and timing are established. All such carried costs are subject to regular technical, commercial and management review on at least an annual basis to confirm the continued intent to develop, or otherwise extract value from, the discovery. Where this is no longer the case, the costs are immediately expensed.
One of the facts and circumstances which indicate that an entity should test such assets for impairment is that the period for which the entity has a right to explore in the specific area has expired or will expire in the near future, and is not expected to be renewed. BP has leases in the Gulf of Mexico making up a prospect, some with terms which were scheduled to expire at the end of 2013 and some with terms which were scheduled to expire at the end of 2014. A significant proportion of our capitalized exploration and appraisal costs in the Gulf of Mexico relate to this prospect. This prospect requires the development of subsea technology to ensure that the hydrocarbons can be extracted safely. BP is in negotiation with the US Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement in relation to seeking extension of these leases so that the discovered hydrocarbons can be developed. BP remains committed to developing this prospect and expects that the leases will be renewed and, therefore, continues to carry the capitalized costs on its balance sheet.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. The initial cost of an asset comprises its purchase price or construction cost, any costs directly attributable to bringing the asset into the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by management, the initial estimate of any decommissioning obligation, if any, and, for assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use, finance costs. The purchase price or construction cost is the aggregate amount paid and the fair value of any other consideration given to acquire the asset. The capitalized value of a finance lease is also included within property, plant and equipment.
Expenditure on major maintenance refits or repairs comprises the cost of replacement assets or parts of assets, inspection costs and overhaul costs.
Where an asset or part of an asset that was separately depreciated is replaced and it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the group, the expenditure is capitalized and the carrying amount of the replaced asset is derecognized. Inspection costs associated with major maintenance programmes are capitalized and amortized over the period to the next inspection. Overhaul costs for major maintenance programmes, and all other maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
Oil and natural gas properties, including related pipelines, are depreciated using a unit-of-production method. The cost of producing wells is amortized over proved developed reserves. Licence acquisition, common facilities and future decommissioning costs are amortized over total proved reserves. The unit-of-production rate for the depreciation of common facilities takes into account expenditures incurred to date, together with estimated future capital expenditure expected to be incurred relating to as yet undeveloped reserves expected to be processed through these common facilities.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 109 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Other property, plant and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over its expected useful life. The typical useful lives of the groups other property, plant and equipment are as follows:
Land improvements |
15 to 25 years | |
Buildings |
20 to 50 years | |
Refineries |
20 to 30 years | |
Petrochemicals plants |
20 to 30 years | |
Pipelines |
10 to 50 years | |
Service stations |
15 years | |
Office equipment |
3 to 7 years | |
Fixtures and fittings |
5 to 15 years |
The expected useful lives of property, plant and equipment are reviewed on an annual basis and, if necessary, changes in useful lives are accounted for prospectively.
An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognized upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset. Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the item) is included in the income statement in the period in which the item is derecognized.
Significant estimate or judgement: estimation of oil and natural gas reserves
The determination of the groups estimated oil and natural gas reserves requires significant judgements and estimates to be applied and these are regularly reviewed and updated. Factors such as the availability of geological and engineering data, reservoir performance data, acquisition and divestment activity, drilling of new wells, and commodity prices all impact on the determination of the groups estimates of its oil and natural gas reserves. BP bases its proved reserves estimates on the requirement of reasonable certainty with rigorous technical and commercial assessments based on conventional industry practice and regulatory requirements.
The estimation of oil and natural gas reserves and BPs process to manage reserves bookings is described in Supplementary information on oil and natural gas on page 169, which is unaudited. Details on BPs proved reserves and production compliance and governance processes are provided on page 228.
Estimates of oil and natural gas reserves are used to calculate depreciation, depletion and amortization charges for the groups oil and gas properties. The impact of changes in estimated proved reserves is dealt with prospectively by amortizing the remaining carrying value of the asset over the expected future production. Oil and natural gas reserves also have a direct impact on the assessment of the recoverability of asset carrying values reported in the financial statements. If proved reserves estimates are revised downwards, earnings could be affected by changes in depreciation expense or an immediate write-down of the propertys carrying value.
The 2015 movements in proved reserves are reflected in the tables showing movements in oil and natural gas reserves by region in Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) on page 169. Information on the carrying amounts of the groups oil and natural gas properties, together with the amounts recognized in the income statement as depreciation, depletion and amortization is contained in Note 11 and Note 5 respectively.
Impairment of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, and goodwill
The group assesses assets or groups of assets, called cash-generating units (CGUs), for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or CGU may not be recoverable; for example, changes in the groups business plans, changes in the groups assumptions about commodity prices, low plant utilization, evidence of physical damage or, for oil and gas assets, significant downward revisions of estimated reserves or increases in estimated future development expenditure or decommissioning costs. If any such indication of impairment exists, the group makes an estimate of the assets or CGUs recoverable amount. Individual assets are grouped into CGUs for impairment assessment purposes at the lowest level at which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows of other groups of assets. A CGUs recoverable amount is the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and its value in use. Where the carrying amount of a CGU exceeds its recoverable amount, the CGU is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount.
The business segment plans, which are approved on an annual basis by senior management, are the primary source of information for the determination of value in use. They contain forecasts for oil and natural gas production, refinery throughputs, sales volumes for various types of refined products (e.g. gasoline and lubricants), revenues, costs and capital expenditure. As an initial step in the preparation of these plans, various assumptions regarding market conditions, such as oil prices, natural gas prices, refining margins, refined product margins and cost inflation rates are set by senior management. These assumptions take account of existing prices, global supply-demand equilibrium for oil and natural gas, other macroeconomic factors and historical trends and variability. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are adjusted for the risks specific to the asset group and are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money.
Fair value less costs of disposal is the price that would be received to sell the asset in an orderly transaction between market participants and does not reflect the effects of factors that may be specific to the group and not applicable to entities in general.
An assessment is made at each reporting date as to whether there is any indication that previously recognized impairment losses may no longer exist or may have decreased. If such an indication exists, the recoverable amount is estimated. A previously recognized impairment loss is reversed only if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the assets recoverable amount since the last impairment loss was recognized. If that is the case, the carrying amount of the asset is increased to the lower of its recoverable amount and the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation, had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset in prior years. Impairment reversals are recognized in profit or loss. After a reversal, the depreciation charge is adjusted in future periods to allocate the assets revised carrying amount, less any residual value, on a systematic basis over its remaining useful life.
Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the recoverable amount of the group of cash-generating units to which the goodwill relates should be assessed. In assessing whether goodwill has been impaired, the carrying amount of the group of CGUs to which goodwill has been allocated is compared with its recoverable amount. Where the recoverable amount of the group of CGUs is less than the carrying amount (including goodwill), an impairment loss is recognized. An impairment loss recognized for goodwill is not reversed in a subsequent period.
110 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Significant estimate or judgement: recoverability of asset carrying values
Determination as to whether, and by how much, an asset, CGU, or group of CGUs containing goodwill is impaired involves management estimates on highly uncertain matters such as future commodity prices, the effects of inflation on operating expenses, discount rates, production profiles and the outlook for global or regional market supply-and-demand conditions for crude oil, natural gas and refined products.
For oil and natural gas properties, the expected future cash flows are estimated using managements best estimate of future oil and natural gas prices and production and reserves volumes. Judgement is also required when determining the appropriate grouping of assets into a CGU or the appropriate grouping of CGUs for impairment testing purposes.
The estimated future level of production in all impairment tests is based on assumptions about future commodity prices, production and development costs, field decline rates, current fiscal regimes and other factors.
Fair value less costs of disposal may be determined based on similar recent market transaction data or, where recent market transactions for the asset are not available for reference, using discounted cash flow techniques. Where discounted cash flow analyses are used to calculate fair value less costs of disposal, accounting judgements are made about the assumptions market participants would use when pricing the asset, CGU or group of CGUs containing goodwill and the test is performed on a post-tax basis. The post-tax discount rate used is based upon the cost of funding the group derived from an established model. Adjustments are made, where applicable, to take into account any specific risks relating to the country where the cash-generating unit is located. In 2015 the discount rate used to determine recoverable amounts based on fair value less costs of disposal was 7% (2014 8%), with a 2% premium added in higher-risk countries.
When estimating the fair value of our Upstream assets, assumptions reflect all reserves that a market participant would consider when valuing the asset, which are usually broader in scope than the reserves used in a value-in-use test. Discounted cash flow analyses used to calculate fair value less costs of disposal use market prices for the first five years and long-term price assumptions that are consistent with the assumptions used by the group for investment appraisal purposes thereafter. The long-term price assumptions used in such tests are $90 per barrel for Brent in 2021 (2014 $97 per barrel in 2020) and $5.60/mmBtu for Henry Hub in 2021 (2014 $6.00/mmBtu in 2020), both inflated at a rate of 2% per annum for the remaining life of the asset (2014 2.5%). These long-term assumptions are derived from the $80 per barrel real oil price and $5/mmBtu real Henry Hub assumptions used for investment appraisal. In the current price environment, the market prices used for the first five years of both value-in-use and fair value less costs of disposal impairment tests are particularly volatile. Market prices used for the first five years of both value-in-use and fair value less costs of disposal impairment tests performed at the year end are shown in the table below:
Price assumptions for the first five years | as at 31 December 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brent oil price ($/bbl) |
40 | 47 | 52 | 54 | 56 | |||||||||||||||||
Henry Hub natural gas price ($/mmBtu) |
2.38 | 2.76 | 2.90 | 3.03 | 3.18 | |||||||||||||||||
as at 31 December 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | ||||||||||||||||||
Brent oil price ($/bbl) |
61 | 69 | 73 | 76 | 77 | |||||||||||||||||
Henry Hub natural gas price ($/mmBtu) |
3.11 | 3.53 | 3.82 | 4.00 | 4.15 |
For value-in-use calculations, future cash flows are adjusted for risks specific to the cash-generating unit and are discounted using a pre-tax discount rate. The pre-tax discount rate is derived from the cost of funding the group calculated using an established model, and is adjusted, where applicable, to take into account any specific risks relating to the country where the cash-generating unit is located. In 2015 the discount rate used to determine recoverable amounts based on value in use was 11% (2014 12%), with a 2% premium added in higher-risk countries. The discount rates applied in assessments of impairment are reassessed each year. Reserves assumptions for value-in-use tests are restricted to proved and probable reserves.
For value-in-use calculations relating to Upstream assets, prices for oil and natural gas used for future cash flow calculations are based on market prices for the first five years (consistent with those shown in the table above) and the groups flat nominal long-term price assumptions thereafter. As at 31 December 2015, the groups long-term flat nominal price assumptions were $90 per barrel for Brent and $6.50/mmBtu for Henry Hub (2014 $90 per barrel and $6.50/mmBtu). These long-term price assumptions are subject to periodic review.
Irrespective of whether there is any indication of impairment, BP is required to test annually for impairment of goodwill acquired in a business combination. The group carries goodwill of approximately $11.6 billion on its balance sheet (2014 $11.9 billion), principally relating to the Atlantic Richfield, Burmah Castrol, Devon Energy and Reliance transactions. In testing goodwill for impairment, the group uses the approach described above to determine recoverable amount. If there are low oil or natural gas prices, refining margins or marketing margins for an extended period, the group may need to recognize goodwill impairment charges.
The recoverability of intangible exploration and appraisal expenditure is covered under Oil and natural gas exploration, appraisal and development expenditure above.
Details of impairment charges and reversals recognized in the income statement are provided in Note 4 and details on the carrying amounts of assets are shown in Note 11, Note 13 and Note 14.
Inventories
Inventories, other than inventories held for trading purposes, are stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined by the first-in first-out method and comprises direct purchase costs, cost of production, transportation and manufacturing expenses. Net realizable value is determined by reference to prices existing at the balance sheet date, adjusted where the sale of inventories after the reporting period gives evidence about their net realizable value at the end of the period.
Inventories held for trading purposes are stated at fair value less costs to sell and any changes in fair value are recognized in the income statement.
Supplies are valued at the lower of cost on a weighted average basis and net realizable value.
Leases
Finance leases are capitalized at the commencement of the lease term at the fair value of the leased item or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. Finance charges are allocated to each period so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 111 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
liability and are charged directly against income. Capitalized leased assets are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term.
Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Financial assets
Financial assets are recognized initially at fair value, normally being the transaction price plus, in the case of financial assets not at fair value through profit or loss, directly attributable transaction costs. The subsequent measurement of financial assets depends on their classification, as follows:
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method if the time value of money is significant. Gains and losses are recognized in income when the loans and receivables are derecognized or impaired, as well as through the amortization process. This category of financial assets includes trade and other receivables. Cash equivalents are short-term highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash, are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value and have a maturity of three months or less from the date of acquisition.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are carried on the balance sheet at fair value with gains or losses recognized in the income statement. Derivatives, other than those designated as effective hedging instruments, are classified as held for trading and are included in this category.
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge
These derivatives are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. The treatment of gains and losses arising from revaluation is described below in the accounting policy for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities.
Held-to-maturity financial assets
Held-to-maturity financial assets are measured at amortized cost, using the effective interest method, less any impairment.
Available-for-sale financial assets
Available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value, with gains or losses recognized within other comprehensive income, except for impairment losses, and, for available-for-sale debt instruments, foreign exchange gains or losses, interest recognized using the effective interest method, and any changes in fair value arising from revised estimates of future cash flows, which are recognized in profit or loss.
Impairment of loans and receivables
The group assesses at each balance sheet date whether a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired. If there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on loans and receivables carried at amortized cost has been incurred, the amount of the loss is measured as the difference between the assets carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows discounted at the financial assets original effective interest rate. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced, with the amount of the loss recognized in the income statement.
Significant estimate or judgement: recoverability of trade receivables
Judgements are required in assessing the recoverability of overdue trade receivables and determining whether a provision against those receivables is required. Factors considered include the credit rating of the counterparty, the amount and timing of anticipated future payments and any possible actions that can be taken to mitigate the risk of non-payment. See Note 28 for information on overdue receivables.
Financial liabilities
The measurement of financial liabilities depends on their classification, as follows:
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss are carried on the balance sheet at fair value with gains or losses recognized in the income statement. Derivatives, other than those designated as effective hedging instruments, are classified as held for trading and are included in this category.
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge
These derivatives are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. The treatment of gains and losses arising from revaluation is described below in the accounting policy for derivative financial instruments and hedging activities.
Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost
All other financial liabilities are initially recognized at fair value, net of transaction costs. For interest-bearing loans and borrowings this is the fair value of the proceeds received net of issue costs associated with the borrowing.
After initial recognition, other financial liabilities are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any issue costs and any discount or premium on settlement. Gains and losses arising on the repurchase, settlement or cancellation of liabilities are recognized in interest and other income and finance costs respectively.
This category of financial liabilities includes trade and other payables and finance debt, except finance debt designated in a fair value hedge relationship.
Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities
The group uses derivative financial instruments to manage certain exposures to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices, as well as for trading purposes. These derivative financial instruments are recognized initially at fair value on the date on which a derivative contract is entered into and subsequently remeasured at fair value. Derivatives are carried as assets when the fair value is positive and as liabilities when the fair value is negative.
Contracts to buy or sell a non-financial item (for example, oil, oil products, gas or power) that can be settled net in cash, with the exception of contracts that were entered into and continue to be held for the purpose of the receipt or delivery of a non-financial item in accordance with the groups expected purchase, sale or usage requirements, are accounted for as financial instruments. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of derivatives that are not designated as effective hedging instruments are recognized in the income statement.
If, at inception of a contract, the valuation cannot be supported by observable market data, any gain or loss determined by the valuation methodology is not recognized in the income statement but is deferred on the balance sheet and is commonly known as day-one gain or loss. This deferred gain or loss is recognized in the income statement over the life of the contract until substantially all the remaining contract term can be valued using observable market data at which point any remaining deferred gain or loss is recognized in the income statement. Changes in valuation subsequent to the initial valuation are recognized immediately through the income statement.
112 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
For the purpose of hedge accounting, hedges are classified as:
| fair value hedges when hedging exposure to changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability |
| cash flow hedges when hedging exposure to variability in cash flows that is attributable to either a particular risk associated with a recognized asset or liability or a highly probable forecast transaction. |
Hedge relationships are formally designated and documented at inception, together with the risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedge. The documentation includes identification of the hedging instrument, the hedged item or transaction, the nature of the risk being hedged, and how the entity will assess the hedging instrument effectiveness in offsetting the exposure to changes in the hedged items fair value or cash flows attributable to the hedged risk. Such hedges are expected at inception to be highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows. Hedges meeting the criteria for hedge accounting are accounted for as follows:
Fair value hedges
The change in fair value of a hedging derivative is recognized in profit or loss. The change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged is recorded as part of the carrying value of the hedged item and is also recognized in profit or loss. The group applies fair value hedge accounting when hedging interest rate risk and certain currency risks on fixed rate borrowings.
If the criteria for hedge accounting are no longer met, or if the group revokes the designation, the accumulated adjustment to the carrying amount of a hedged item at such time is then amortized to profit or loss over the remaining period to maturity.
Cash flow hedges
The effective portion of the gain or loss on a cash flow hedging instrument is recognized within other comprehensive income, while the ineffective portion is recognized in profit or loss. Amounts taken to other comprehensive income are reclassified to the income statement when the hedged transaction affects profit or loss.
Where the hedged item is a non-financial asset or liability, such as a forecast foreign currency transaction for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, the amounts recognized within other comprehensive income are reclassified to the initial carrying amount of the non-financial asset or
liability. Where the hedged item is an equity investment, the amounts recognized in other comprehensive income remain in the separate component of equity until the hedged cash flows affect profit or loss. Where the hedged item is recognized directly in profit or loss, the amounts recognized in other
comprehensive income are reclassified to production and manufacturing expenses, except for cash flow hedges of variable interest rate risk which are reclassified to finance costs.
If the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated or exercised without replacement or rollover, or if its designation as a hedge is revoked, amounts previously recognized within other comprehensive income remain in equity until the forecast transaction occurs and are reclassified to the income statement or to the initial carrying amount of a non-financial asset or liability as above.
Significant estimate or judgement: application of hedge accounting
The decision as to whether to apply hedge accounting within subsidiaries, and by equity-accounted entities, can have a significant impact on the groups financial statements. Cash flow and fair value hedge accounting is applied to certain finance debt-related instruments in the normal course of business and cash flow hedge accounting is applied to certain highly probable foreign currency transactions as part of the management of currency risk. See Note 16, Note 28 and Note 29 for further information.
Fair value measurement
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The group categorizes assets and liabilities measured at fair value into one of three levels depending on the ability to observe inputs employed in their measurement. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, other than quoted prices included within level 1 for the asset or liability. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability reflecting significant modifications to observable related market data or BPs assumptions about pricing by market participants.
Significant estimate or judgement: valuation of derivatives
In some cases the fair values of derivatives are estimated using internal models due to the absence of quoted prices or other observable, market-corroborated data. This applies to the groups longer-term derivative contracts. The majority of these contracts are valued using models with inputs that include price curves for each of the different products that are built up from available active market pricing data and modelled using the maximum available external pricing information. Additionally, where limited data exists for certain products, prices are determined using historic and long-term pricing relationships. Price volatility is also an input for options models.
Changes in the key assumptions could have a material impact on the fair value gains and losses on derivatives recognized in the income statement. For more information see Note 29.
Offsetting of financial assets and liabilities
Financial assets and liabilities are presented gross in the balance sheet unless both of the following criteria are met: the group currently has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognized amounts; and the group intends to either settle on a net basis or realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. A right of set off is the groups legal right to settle an amount payable to a creditor by applying against it an amount receivable from the same counterparty. The relevant legal jurisdiction and laws applicable to the relationships between the parties are considered when assessing whether a current legally enforceable right to set off exists.
Provisions, contingencies and reimbursement assets
Provisions are recognized when the group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event, it is probable that an outflow of resources embodying economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation. Where appropriate, the future cash flow estimates are adjusted to reflect risks specific to the liability.
If the effect of the time value of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax risk-free rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due to the passage of time is recognized within finance costs. A provision is discounted using either a nominal discount rate of 2.75% (2014 2.75%) or a real discount rate of 0.75% (2014 0.75%), as appropriate. Provisions are split between amounts expected to be settled within 12 months of the balance sheet date (current) and amounts expected to be settled later (non-current).
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 113 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Contingent liabilities are possible obligations whose existence will only be confirmed by future events not wholly within the control of the group, or present obligations where it is not probable that an outflow of resources will be required or the amount of the obligation cannot be measured with sufficient reliability. Contingent liabilities are not recognized in the financial statements but are disclosed unless the possibility of an outflow of economic resources is considered remote.
Where the group makes contributions into a separately administered fund for restoration, environmental or other obligations, which it does not control, and the groups right to the assets in the fund is restricted, the obligation to contribute to the fund is recognized as a liability where it is probable that such additional contributions will be made. The group recognizes a reimbursement asset separately, being the lower of the amount of the associated restoration, environmental or other provision and the groups share of the fair value of the net assets of the fund available to contributors.
Significant estimate or judgement: provision relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill
Detailed information on the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, including the financial impacts, is provided in Note 2.
During 2015, BP signed agreements in principle, which were subject to execution of definitive agreements, to settle all federal and state claims and claims made by more than 400 local government entities. Further detail is provided in Note 2. Certain agreements are subject to approval by the court of a Consent Decree. A provision for amounts payable under these agreements has, therefore, been recognized. The agreements significantly reduce the uncertainties faced by BP following the Gulf of Mexico oil spill in 2010. However, there continues to be uncertainty regarding the outcome or resolution of current or future litigation and the extent and timing of costs relating to the incident not covered by these agreements.
The provision recognized is the reliable estimate of expenditures required to settle certain present obligations at the end of the reporting period. There are future expenditures, however, for which it is not possible to measure the obligation reliably. These are not provided for, are disclosed as contingent liabilities, and are described in Note 2. Contingent liabilities are disclosed in relation to business economic loss (BEL) claims under the Plaintiffs Steering Committee (PSC) settlement, securities-related litigation, other litigation, including claims from parties excluded from or who opted out of the PSC settlement, and under the settlement agreements with Anadarko and MOEX and other agreements.
Management believes that no reliable estimate can currently be made of any BEL claims not yet processed or processed but not yet paid, except where an eligibility notice has been issued and is not subject to appeal by BP within the claims facility. The submission deadline for BEL claims passed on 8 June 2015; no further claims can be submitted. A significant number of BEL claims have been received but have not yet been processed and it is not possible to quantify the total value of the claims. A revised policy for the matching of revenue and expenses for BEL claims was introduced in May 2014 and, of the claims assessable under the new policy, the majority have not yet been determined at this time. For this and other reasons set out in Note 2, we are unable to reliably estimate future trends of the number and proportion of claims that will be determined to be eligible, nor can we reliably estimate the value of such claims. A provision for such BEL claims will be established when these uncertainties are sufficiently reduced and a reliable estimate can be made of the liability.
Decommissioning
Liabilities for decommissioning costs are recognized when the group has an obligation to plug and abandon a well, dismantle and remove a facility or an item of plant and to restore the site on which it is located, and when a reliable estimate of that liability can be made. Where an obligation exists for a new facility or item of plant, such as oil and natural gas production or transportation facilities, this liability will be recognized on construction or installation. Similarly, where an obligation exists for a well, this liability is recognized when it is drilled. An obligation for decommissioning may also crystallize during the period of operation of a well, facility or item of plant through a change in legislation or through a decision to terminate operations; an obligation may also arise in cases where an asset has been sold but the subsequent owner is no longer able to fulfil its decommissioning obligations, for example due to bankruptcy. The amount recognized is the present value of the estimated future expenditure determined in accordance with local conditions and requirements. The provision for the costs of decommissioning wells, production facilities and pipelines at the end of their economic lives is estimated using existing technology, at current prices or future assumptions, depending on the expected timing of the activity, and discounted using the real discount rate. The weighted average period over which these costs are generally expected to be incurred is estimated to be approximately 17 years.
An amount equivalent to the decommissioning provision is recognized as part of the corresponding intangible asset (in the case of an exploration or appraisal well) or property, plant and equipment. The decommissioning portion of the property, plant and equipment is subsequently depreciated at the same rate as the rest of the asset. Other than the unwinding of discount on the provision, any change in the present value of the estimated expenditure is reflected as an adjustment to the provision and the corresponding asset.
Environmental expenditures and liabilities
Environmental expenditures that are required in order for the group to obtain future economic benefits from its assets are capitalized as part of those assets. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations that do not contribute to future earnings are expensed.
Liabilities for environmental costs are recognized when a clean-up is probable and the associated costs can be reliably estimated. Generally, the timing of recognition of these provisions coincides with the commitment to a formal plan of action or, if earlier, on divestment or on closure of inactive sites.
The amount recognized is the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation. Provisions for environmental liabilities have been estimated using existing technology, at current prices and discounted using a real discount rate. The weighted average period over which these costs are generally expected to be incurred is estimated to be approximately five years.
Significant estimate or judgement: provisions
The group holds provisions for the future decommissioning of oil and natural gas production facilities and pipelines at the end of their economic lives. The largest decommissioning obligations facing BP relate to the plugging and abandonment of wells and the removal and disposal of oil and natural gas platforms and pipelines around the world. Most of these decommissioning events are many years in the future and the precise requirements that will have to be met when the removal event occurs are uncertain. Decommissioning technologies and costs are constantly changing, as well as political, environmental, safety and public expectations. BP believes that the impact of any reasonably foreseeable change to these provisions on the groups results of operations, financial position or liquidity will not be material. If oil and natural gas production facilities and pipelines are sold to third parties and the subsequent owner is unable to meet their decommissioning obligations, judgement must be used to determine whether BP is then responsible for decommissioning, and if so the extent of that responsibility. The timing and amounts of future cash flows are subject to significant uncertainty. Any changes in the expected future costs are reflected in both the provision and the asset.
114 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Decommissioning provisions associated with downstream and petrochemicals facilities are generally not recognized, as the potential obligations cannot be measured, given their indeterminate settlement dates. The group performs periodic reviews of its downstream and petrochemicals long-lived assets for any changes in facts and circumstances that might require the recognition of a decommissioning provision.
The provision for environmental liabilities is estimated based on current legal and constructive requirements, technology, price levels and expected plans for remediation. Actual costs and cash outflows can differ from estimates because of changes in laws and regulations, public expectations, prices, discovery and analysis of site conditions and changes in clean-up technology.
Other provisions and liabilities are recognized in the period when it becomes probable that there will be a future outflow of funds resulting from past operations or events and the amount of cash outflow can be reliably estimated. The timing of recognition and quantification of the liability require the application of judgement to existing facts and circumstances, which can be subject to change. Since the cash outflows can take place many years in the future, the carrying amounts of provisions and liabilities are reviewed regularly and adjusted to take account of changing facts and circumstances.
The timing and amount of future expenditures are reviewed annually, together with the interest rate used in discounting the cash flows. The interest rate used to determine the balance sheet obligation at the end of 2015 was a real rate of 0.75% (2014 0.75%), which was based on long-dated US government bonds.
Provisions and contingent liabilities relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill are discussed in Note 2. Information about the groups other provisions is provided in Note 22. As further described in Note 32, the group is subject to claims and actions. The facts and circumstances relating to particular cases are evaluated regularly in determining whether a provision relating to a specific litigation should be recognized or revised. Accordingly, significant management judgement relating to provisions and contingent liabilities is required, since the outcome of litigation is difficult to predict.
Employee benefits
Wages, salaries, bonuses, social security contributions, paid annual leave and sick leave are accrued in the period in which the associated services are rendered by employees of the group. Deferred bonus arrangements that have a vesting date more than 12 months after the balance sheet date are valued on an actuarial basis using the projected unit credit method and amortized on a straight-line basis over the service period until the award vests. The accounting policies for share-based payments and for pensions and other post-retirement benefits are described below.
Share-based payments
Equity-settled transactions
The cost of equity-settled transactions with employees is measured by reference to the fair value at the date at which equity instruments are granted and is recognized as an expense over the vesting period, which ends on the date on which the employees become fully entitled to the award. A corresponding credit is recognized within equity. Fair value is determined by using an appropriate, widely used, valuation model. In valuing equity-settled transactions, no account is taken of any vesting conditions, other than conditions linked to the price of the shares of the company (market conditions). Non-vesting conditions, such as the condition that employees contribute to a savings-related plan, are taken into account in the grant-date fair value, and failure to meet a non-vesting condition, where this is within the control of the employee is treated as a cancellation and any remaining unrecognized cost is expensed.
Cash-settled transactions
The cost of cash-settled transactions is recognized as an expense over the vesting period, measured by reference to the fair value of the corresponding liability which is recognized on the balance sheet. The liability is remeasured at fair value at each balance sheet date until settlement, with changes in fair value recognized in the income statement.
Pensions and other post-retirement benefits
The cost of providing benefits under the groups defined benefit plans is determined separately for each plan using the projected unit credit method, which attributes entitlement to benefits to the current period to determine current service cost and to the current and prior periods to determine the present value of the defined benefit obligation. Past service costs, resulting from either a plan amendment or a curtailment (a reduction in future obligations as a result of a material reduction in the plan membership), are recognized immediately when the company becomes committed to a change.
Net interest expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits, which is recognized in the income statement, represents the net change in present value of plan obligations and the value of plan assets resulting from the passage of time, and is determined by applying the discount rate to the present value of the benefit obligation at the start of the year, and to the fair value of plan assets at the start of the year, taking into account expected changes in the obligation or plan assets during the year.
Remeasurements of the defined benefit liability and asset, comprising actuarial gains and losses, and the return on plan assets (excluding amounts included in net interest described above) are recognized within other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur and are not subsequently reclassified to profit and loss.
The defined benefit pension plan surplus or deficit recognized in the balance sheet for each plan comprises the difference between the present value of the defined benefit obligation (using a discount rate based on high quality corporate bonds) and the fair value of plan assets out of which the obligations are to be settled directly. Fair value is based on market price information and, in the case of quoted securities, is the published bid price. Defined benefit pension plan surpluses are only recognized to the extent they are recoverable, typically by way of refund.
Contributions to defined contribution plans are recognized in the income statement in the period in which they become payable.
Significant estimate or judgement: pensions and other post-retirement benefits
Accounting for pensions and other post-retirement benefits involves judgement about uncertain events, including estimated retirement dates, salary levels at retirement, mortality rates, determination of discount rates for measuring plan obligations and net interest expense and assumptions for inflation rates.
These assumptions are based on the environment in each country. The assumptions used may vary from year to year, which would affect future net income and net assets. Any differences between these assumptions and the actual outcome also affect future net income and net assets.
Pension and other post-retirement benefit assumptions are reviewed by management at the end of each year. These assumptions are used to determine the projected benefit obligation at the year end and hence the surpluses and deficits recorded on the groups balance sheet, and pension and other post-retirement benefit expense for the following year. The assumptions used are provided in Note 23.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 115 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
The discount rate and inflation rate have a significant effect on the amounts reported. A sensitivity analysis of the impact of changes in these assumptions on the benefit expense and obligation is provided in Note 23.
In addition to the financial assumptions, we regularly review the demographic and mortality assumptions. Mortality assumptions reflect best practice in the countries in which we provide pensions and have been chosen with regard to the latest available published tables adjusted where appropriate to reflect the experience of the group and an extrapolation of past longevity improvements into the future. A sensitivity analysis of the impact of changes in the mortality assumptions on the benefit expense and obligation is provided in Note 23.
Income taxes
Income tax expense represents the sum of current tax and deferred tax. Interest and penalties relating to income tax are also included in the income tax expense.
Income tax is recognized in the income statement, except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, in which case the related tax is recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity.
Current tax is based on the taxable profit for the period. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the income statement because it is determined in accordance with the rules established by the applicable taxation authorities. It therefore excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other periods as well as items that are never taxable or deductible. The groups liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.
Deferred tax is provided, using the liability method, on temporary differences at the balance sheet date between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for all taxable temporary differences except:
| where the deferred tax liability arises on the initial recognition of goodwill |
| where the deferred tax liability arises on the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss |
| in respect of taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and associates and interests in joint arrangements, where the group is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary differences and it is probable that the temporary differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future. |
Deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, carry-forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences and the carry-forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilized except where the deferred tax asset relating to the deductible temporary difference arises from the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction that is not a business combination and, at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting profit nor taxable profit or loss. In respect of deductible temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and associates and interests in joint arrangements, deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that the temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future and taxable profit will be available against which the temporary differences can be utilized.
The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each balance sheet date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilized.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are not discounted.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset only when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities where there is an intention to settle the current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis or to realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.
Significant estimate or judgement: income taxes
The computation of the groups income tax expense and liability involves the interpretation of applicable tax laws and regulations in many jurisdictions throughout the world. The resolution of tax positions taken by the group, through negotiations with relevant tax authorities or through litigation, can take several years to complete and in some cases it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome. Therefore, judgement is required to determine provisions for income taxes.
In addition, the group has carry-forward tax losses and tax credits in certain taxing jurisdictions that are available to offset against future taxable profit. However, deferred tax assets are recognized only to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the unused tax losses or tax credits can be utilized. Management judgement is exercised in assessing whether this is the case.
To the extent that actual outcomes differ from managements estimates, income tax charges or credits, and changes in current and deferred tax assets or liabilities, may arise in future periods. For more information see Note 8.
Judgement is also required when determining whether a particular tax is an income tax or another type of tax (for example a production tax). Accounting for deferred tax is applied to income taxes as described above, but is not applied to other types of taxes; rather such taxes are recognized in the income statement on an appropriate basis.
Customs duties and sales taxes
Customs duties and sales taxes which are passed on to customers are excluded from revenues and expenses. Assets and liabilities are recognized net of the amount of customs duties or sales tax except:
| Customs duties or sales taxes incurred on the purchase of goods and services which are not recoverable from the taxation authority are recognized as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset. |
| Receivables and payables are stated with the amount of customs duty or sales tax included. |
The net amount of sales tax recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included within receivables or payables in the balance sheet.
116 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
1. Significant accounting policies, judgements, estimates and assumptions continued
Own equity instruments Treasury shares
The groups holdings in its own equity instruments are shown as deductions from shareholders equity at cost. Treasury shares represent BP shares repurchased and available for specific and limited purposes. For accounting purposes, shares held in Employee Share Ownership Plans (ESOPs) to meet the future requirements of the employee share-based payment plans are treated in the same manner as treasury shares and are, therefore, included in the financial statements as treasury shares. Consideration, if any, received for the sale of such shares is also recognized in equity, with any difference between the proceeds from sale and the original cost being taken to the profit and loss account reserve. No gain or loss is recognized in the income statement on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of equity shares. Shares repurchased under the share buy-back programme which are immediately cancelled are not shown as treasury shares, but are shown as a deduction from the profit and loss account reserve in the group statement of changes in equity.
Revenue
Revenue arising from the sale of goods is recognized when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have passed to the buyer, which is typically at the point that title passes, and the revenue can be reliably measured.
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable and represents amounts receivable for goods provided in the normal course of business, net of discounts, customs duties and sales taxes.
Physical exchanges are reported net, as are sales and purchases made with a common counterparty, as part of an arrangement similar to a physical exchange. Similarly, where the group acts as agent on behalf of a third party to procure or market energy commodities, any associated fee income is recognized but no purchase or sale is recorded. Additionally, where forward sale and purchase contracts for oil, natural gas or power have been determined to be for trading purposes, the associated sales and purchases are reported net within sales and other operating revenues whether or not physical delivery has occurred.
Generally, revenues from the production of oil and natural gas properties in which the group has an interest with joint operation partners are recognized on the basis of the groups working interest in those properties (the entitlement method). Differences between the production sold and the groups share of production are not significant.
Finance costs
Finance costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets, which are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use, are added to the cost of those assets until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use. All other finance costs are recognized in the income statement in the period in which they are incurred.
Impact of new International Financial Reporting Standards
There are no new or amended standards or interpretations adopted during the year that have a significant impact on the financial statements.
Not yet adopted
The following pronouncements from the IASB will become effective for future financial reporting periods and have not yet been adopted by the group.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments will supersede IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. IFRS 9 covers classification and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities, impairment methodology and hedge accounting.
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers provides a single model for accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018. IFRS 15 will supersede IAS 18 Revenue.
The IASB has issued IFRS 16 Leases which provides a new model for lease accounting in which all leases, other than short-term and small-ticket-item leases, will be accounted for by the recognition on the balance sheet of a right-to-use asset and a lease liability, and the subsequent amortization of the right-to-use asset over the lease term. IFRS 16 will be effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019 and is expected to have a significant effect on the groups financial statements, significantly increasing the groups recognized assets and liabilities and potentially affecting the presentation and timing of recognition of charges in the income statement. Information on the groups leases currently classified as operating leases, which are not recognized on the balance sheet, is provided in Note 27.
BP does not expect to adopt IFRS 9 or IFRS 15 before 1 January 2018 and has not yet determined its date of adoption for IFRS 16. The group has not yet completed its evaluation of the effect of adoption of these standards. The EU has not yet adopted IFRS 9, IFRS 15 or IFRS 16.
There are no other standards and interpretations in issue but not yet adopted that the directors anticipate will have a material effect on the reported income or net assets of the group.
2. Significant event Gulf of Mexico oil spill
As a consequence of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill in April 2010, BP continues to incur costs and has also recognized liabilities for certain future costs. Liabilities of uncertain timing or amount, for which no provision has been made, have been disclosed as contingent liabilities.
The cumulative pre-tax income statement charge since the incident amounts to $55.5 billion. For more information on the types of expenditure included in the cumulative income statement charge, see Impact upon the group income statement below. The cumulative income statement charge does not include amounts for obligations that BP considers are not possible, at this time, to measure reliably. For further information, including developments in relation to business economic loss claims under the Plaintiffs Steering Committee (PSC) settlement, see Provisions and contingent liabilities below.
On 2 July 2015, agreements in principle to settle all federal and state claims and claims made by more than 400 local government entities were signed. These agreements in principle were subject to execution of definitive agreements, including a Consent Decree with the United States and Gulf states with respect to the Clean Water Act penalty and natural resource damages and other claims, a Settlement Agreement with five Gulf states with respect to state claims for economic loss, property damage and other claims, and resolution to BPs satisfaction of the economic loss, property damage and other claims with more than 400 local government entities. The proposed Consent Decree between the United States, the Gulf states and BP was available for public comment until early December 2015 and is subject to final court approval. The Consent Decree and Settlement Agreement with the five Gulf states are conditional upon each other and neither will become effective unless there is final court approval of the Consent Decree. The United States is expected to file a motion with the court to enter the Consent Decree as a final settlement around the end of March, which the court will then consider. During 2015, the Settlement Agreement with the five Gulf states was executed. BP has accepted releases received from the vast majority of local government entities and payments required under those releases were made during 2015. For more information on the proposed Consent Decree and Settlement Agreement see Legal proceedings on page 238.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 117 |
2. Significant event Gulf of Mexico oil spill continued
The agreements described above (the Agreements) significantly reduce the uncertainties faced by BP following the Gulf of Mexico oil spill in 2010. There continues to be uncertainty regarding the outcome or resolution of current or future litigation and the extent and timing of costs relating to the incident not covered by the Agreements. The total amounts that will ultimately be paid by BP in relation to the incident will be dependent on many factors, as discussed under Provisions and contingent liabilities below, including in relation to any new information or future developments. These uncertainties could have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results and cash flows.
The impacts of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill on the income statement, balance sheet and cash flow statement of the group are included within the relevant line items in those statements and are shown in the table below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Income statement |
||||||||||||||
Production and manufacturing expenses |
11,709 | 781 | 430 | |||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
(11,709 | ) | (781 | ) | (430 | ) | ||||||||
Finance costs |
247 | 38 | 39 | |||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
(11,956 | ) | (819 | ) | (469 | ) | ||||||||
Less: Taxation |
3,492 | 262 | 73 | |||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the period |
(8,464 | ) | (557 | ) | (396 | ) | ||||||||
Balance sheet |
||||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
686 | 1,154 | ||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables |
(693 | ) | (655 | ) | ||||||||||
Accruals |
(40 | ) | | |||||||||||
Provisions |
(3,076 | ) | (1,702 | ) | ||||||||||
Net current assets (liabilities) |
(3,123 | ) | (1,203 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||||
Other receivables |
| 2,701 | ||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||||||||
Other payables |
(2,057 | ) | (2,412 | ) | ||||||||||
Accruals |
(186 | ) | (169 | ) | ||||||||||
Provisions |
(13,431 | ) | (6,903 | ) | ||||||||||
Deferred tax |
5,200 | 1,723 | ||||||||||||
Net non-current assets (liabilities) |
(10,474 | ) | (5,060 | ) | ||||||||||
Net assets (liabilities) |
(13,597 | ) | (6,263 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash flow statement |
||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
(11,956 | ) | (819 | ) | (469 | ) | ||||||||
Finance costs |
247 | 38 | 39 | |||||||||||
Net charge for provisions, less payments |
11,296 | 939 | 1,129 | |||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in other current and non-current assets |
| (662 | ) | (1,481 | ) | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in other current and non-current liabilities |
(732 | ) | (792 | ) | (618 | ) | ||||||||
Pre-tax cash flows |
(1,145 | ) | (1,296 | ) | (1,400 | ) |
The impact on net cash provided by operating activities, on a post-tax basis, amounted to an outflow of $1,130 million (2014 outflow of $9 million and 2013 outflow of $73 million).
Trust fund
BP established the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Trust (the Trust), funded in the amount of $20 billion, to satisfy legitimate individual and business claims, state and local government claims resolved by BP, final judgments and settlements, state and local response costs, and natural resource damages and related costs. Fines and penalties are not covered by the trust fund. The funding of the Trust was completed in 2012. The obligation to fund the $20-billion trust fund, adjusted to take account of the time value of money, was recognized in full in 2010 and charged to the income statement.
BPs rights and obligations in relation to the $20-billion trust fund are accounted for in accordance with IFRIC 5 Rights to Interests Arising from Decommissioning, Restoration and Environmental Rehabilitation Funds. An asset has been recognized representing BPs right to receive reimbursement from the trust fund. We use the term reimbursement asset to describe this asset. BP does not actually receive any reimbursements from the trust fund, instead payments are made directly from the trust fund, and BP is released from its corresponding obligation. This is the portion of the estimated future expenditure provided for that will be settled by payments from the trust fund. During 2014, cumulative charges to be paid by the Trust reached $20 billion. Subsequent additional costs, over and above those provided within the $20 billion, are expensed to the income statement as incurred.
At 31 December 2015, $686 million of the provisions and payables are eligible to be paid from the Trust. The reimbursement asset is recorded within Trade and other receivables on the balance sheet, all of which is classified as current, as payment of all amounts covered by the remaining reimbursement asset may be requested during 2016. During 2015, $3,022 million of provisions and $147 million of payables were paid from the Trust.
At 31 December 2015, the remaining cash in the Trust not allocated for specific purposes was $25 million. This unallocated amount was exhausted in January 2016 and BP commenced paying claims and other costs not covered by the specific-purpose cash balances. The total cash remaining in the Trust and associated qualifying settlement funds, amounting to $1.4 billion, includes $0.7 billion in the seafood compensation fund, $0.2 billion held for natural resource damage early restoration projects and $0.5 billion held in relation to certain other specified costs under the PSC settlement.
118 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
2. Significant event Gulf of Mexico oil spill continued
Other payables
BP reached an agreement with the US government in 2012, which was approved by the court in 2013, to resolve all federal criminal claims arising from the incident. At 31 December 2015, $2,432 million remains in Other payables in relation to this agreement, of which $530 million falls due in 2016. In addition, Other payables at 31 December 2015 includes the remaining $219 million for BPs commitment to fund the Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative, which is a 10-year research programme to study the impact of the incident on the marine and shoreline environment of the Gulf of Mexico.
Provisions and contingent liabilities
Provisions
BP has recorded provisions relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill in relation to environmental expenditure (including spill response costs), litigation and claims, and Clean Water Act penalties that can be measured reliably at this time.
Movements in each class of provision during the year and cumulatively since the incident are presented in the tables below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||
Environmental |
Litigation
and claims |
Clean Water
Act |
Total | |||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
1,141 | 3,954 | 3,510 | 8,605 | ||||||||||||||
Increase in provision |
5,393 | 5,832 | 661 | 11,886 | ||||||||||||||
Unwinding of discount |
94 | 50 | 68 | 212 | ||||||||||||||
Change in discount rate |
(149 | ) | (74 | ) | (110 | ) | (333 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassified to other payables |
(459 | ) | (125 | ) | | (584 | ) | |||||||||||
Utilization paid by BP |
(23 | ) | (234 | ) | | (257 | ) | |||||||||||
paid by the trust fund |
(78 | ) | (2,944 | ) | | (3,022 | ) | |||||||||||
At 31 December |
5,919 | 6,459 | 4,129 | 16,507 | ||||||||||||||
Of which current |
227 | 2,849 | | 3,076 | ||||||||||||||
non-current |
5,692 | 3,610 | 4,129 | 13,431 |
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative since the incident | ||||||||||||||||||
Environmental |
Litigation
and claims |
Clean Water
Act |
Total | |||||||||||||||
Net increase in provision |
19,992 | 32,427 | 4,171 | 56,590 | ||||||||||||||
Unwinding of discount |
107 | 56 | 68 | 231 | ||||||||||||||
Change in discount rate |
(130 | ) | (74 | ) | (110 | ) | (314 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassified to other payables |
(459 | ) | (4,408 | ) | | (4,867 | ) | |||||||||||
Utilization paid by BP |
(11,710 | ) | (4,314 | ) | | (16,024 | ) | |||||||||||
paid by the trust fund |
(1,881 | ) | (17,228 | ) | | (19,109 | ) | |||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
5,919 | 6,459 | 4,129 | 16,507 |
Environmental
The environmental provision at 31 December 2015 includes amounts payable for natural resource damage costs under the proposed Consent Decree. These amounts are payable in instalments over 16 years commencing one year after the court approves the Consent Decree; the majority of the unpaid balance of this natural resource damages settlement accrues interest at a fixed rate. During 2011, BP entered into a framework agreement with natural resource trustees for the United States and five Gulf states, providing for $1 billion to be spent on early restoration projects to address natural resource injuries resulting from the oil spill, to be funded from the $20-billion trust fund. Remaining amounts payable under this framework agreement, that are not yet allocated to specific projects, are also included in environmental provisions.
Litigation and claims
The litigation and claims provision includes amounts that can be estimated reliably for the future cost of settling claims by individuals and businesses for damage to real or personal property, lost profits or impairment of earning capacity and loss of subsistence use of natural resources (Individual and Business Claims), and amounts provided under the Agreements in relation to state claims that have not yet been paid. Claims administration costs and legal costs have also been provided for.
Litigation and claims PSC settlement
The Economic and Property Damages Settlement Agreement (EPD Settlement Agreement) with the PSC provides for a court-supervised settlement programme, the Deepwater Horizon Court Supervised Settlement Program (DHCSSP), which commenced operation on 4 June 2012. A separate claims administrator has been appointed to pay medical claims and to implement other aspects of the Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement. For further information on the PSC settlements, see Legal proceedings on page 239. BP has provided for its best estimate of the cost associated with the PSC settlement agreements with the exception of the cost of business economic loss claims, which are provided for where an eligibility notice had been issued before the end of the month following the balance sheet date and is not subject to appeal by BP within the claims facility.
Management believes that no reliable estimate can currently be made of any business economic loss claims not yet processed or processed but not yet paid, except where an eligibility notice had been issued before the end of the month following the balance sheet date and is not subject to appeal by BP within the claims facility.
The submission deadline for business economic loss claims passed on 8 June 2015; no further claims may be submitted. A significant number of business economic loss claims have been received but have not yet been processed and it is not possible to quantify the total value of the claims.
A revised policy for the matching of revenue and expenses for business economic loss claims was introduced in May 2014 and, of the claims assessable under the revised policy, the majority have not yet been determined at this time. Uncertainties regarding the proper application of the revised policy to particular claims and categories of claims continue to arise as the claims administrator has applied the revised policy. Only a small proportion of claim determinations have been made under some of the specialized frameworks that have been put in place for particular industries, namely construction, agriculture, professional services and education, and so determinations to date may not be representative of the total population
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 119 |
2. Significant event Gulf of Mexico oil spill continued
of claims. In addition, although some pre-determination data has been provided to BP, detailed data on the majority of pre-determination claims is not available due to a court order to protect claimant confidentiality. Therefore, there is an insufficient level of detail to enable a complete or clear understanding of the composition of the underlying claims population.
There is insufficient data available to build up a track record of claims determinations under the policies and protocols that are now being applied following resolution of the matching and causation issues. We are unable to reliably estimate future trends of the number and proportion of claims that will be determined to be eligible, nor can we reliably estimate the value of such claims. A provision for such business economic loss claims will be established when these uncertainties are sufficiently reduced and a reliable estimate can be made of the liability.
The current estimate for the total cost of those elements of the PSC settlement that BP considers can be reliably estimated, including amounts already paid, is $12.4 billion. Prior to the end of the month following the balance sheet date, the DHCSSP had issued eligibility notices, many of which are disputed by BP, in respect of business economic loss claims of approximately $402 million which have not been provided for. The total cost of the PSC settlement is likely to be significantly higher than the amount recognized to date of $12.4 billion because the current estimate does not reflect business economic loss claims not yet processed, or processed but not yet paid, except where an eligibility notice had been issued before the end of the month following the balance sheet date and is not subject to appeal by BP within the claims facility.
There continues to be a high level of uncertainty with regards to the amounts that ultimately will be paid in relation to current claims as described above and there is also uncertainty as to the cost of administering the claims process under the DHCSSP and in relation to future legal costs. The timing of payment of provisions related to the PSC settlement is dependent upon ongoing claims facility activity and is therefore also uncertain.
Litigation and claims Other claims
The provision recognized for litigation and claims includes amounts agreed under the Agreements in relation to state claims. The amount provided in respect of state claims is payable over 18 years from the date the court approves the Consent Decree, of which $1 billion is due following the court approval of the Consent Decree. The vast majority of local government entities who filed claims have issued releases, which were accepted by BP; amounts due under those releases were paid during 2015.
Clean Water Act penalties
A provision has been recognized for penalties under Section 311 of the Clean Water Act, as determined in the Agreements. The amount is payable in instalments over 15 years, commencing one year after the court approves the Consent Decree. The unpaid balance of this penalty accrues interest at a fixed rate.
Provision movements
The total amount recognized as an increase in provisions during the year was $11,886 million. This increase relates primarily to amounts provided for the Agreements, and additional increases in the litigation and claims provision for business economic loss claims, associated claims administration costs and other items. After deducting amounts utilized during the year totalling $3,279 million, comprising payments from the trust fund of $3,022 million and payments made directly by BP of $257 million (2014 $2,071 million, comprising payments from the trust fund of $1,681 million and payments made directly by BP of $390 million), and after adjustments for discounting, the remaining provision as at 31 December 2015 was $16,507 million (2014 $8,605 million).
Contingent liabilities
BP has provided for its best estimate of amounts expected to be paid that can be measured reliably. It is not possible, at this time, to measure reliably other obligations arising from the incident, nor is it practicable to estimate their magnitude or possible timing of payment. Therefore, no amounts have been provided for these obligations as at 31 December 2015.
Business economic loss claims under the PSC settlement
The potential cost of business economic loss claims not yet processed and paid (except where an eligibility notice had been issued before the end of the month following the balance sheet date and is not subject to appeal by BP within the claims facility) is not provided for and is disclosed as a contingent liability. A significant number of business economic loss claims have been received but have not yet been processed and paid. See Provisions above for further information.
Securities-related litigation
Proceedings relating to securities class actions (MDL 2185) pending in federal court in Texas, including a purported class action on behalf of purchasers of American Depositary Shares under US federal securities law, are continuing. A jury trial is scheduled to begin in July 2016 and the timing of any outflow of resources, if any, is dependent on the duration of the court process. No reliable estimate can be made of the amounts that may be payable in relation to these proceedings, if any, so no provision has been recognized at 31 December 2015. In addition, no reliable estimate can be made of the amounts that may be payable in relation to any other securities litigation, if any, so no provision has been recognized at 31 December 2015.
Other litigation
In addition to the securities class actions described above, BP is named as a defendant in approximately 2,700 other civil lawsuits brought by individuals and corporations in US federal and state courts, as well as certain non-US jurisdictions, resulting from the Deepwater Horizon accident, the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, and the spill response efforts. Further actions may still be brought. Among other claims, these lawsuits assert claims for personal injury in connection with the accident and the spill response, commercial and economic injury, damage to real and personal property, breach of contract and violations of statutes, including, but not limited to, alleged violations of US securities and environmental statutes. In addition, claims have been received, primarily from business claimants, under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90) in relation to the 2010 federal deepwater drilling moratoria. Furthermore, there are also uncertainties around the outcomes of any further litigation including by parties excluded from, or parties who opted out of, the PSC settlement. Until further fact and expert disclosures occur, court rulings clarify the issues in dispute, liability and damage trial activity nears or progresses, or other actions such as further possible settlements occur, it is not possible given these uncertainties to arrive at a range of outcomes or a reliable estimate of the liabilities that may accrue to BP in connection with or as a result of these lawsuits, nor is it possible to determine the timing of any payment that may arise. Therefore no amounts have been provided for these items as at 31 December 2015.
Settlement and other agreements
Under the settlement agreements with Anadarko and MOEX, the other working interest owners in the Macondo well at the time of the incident, and with Cameron International, the designer and manufacturer of the Deepwater Horizon blowout preventer, BP has agreed to indemnify Anadarko, MOEX and Cameron for certain claims arising from the accident. It is therefore possible that BP may face claims under these indemnities, but it is not currently possible to reliably measure, nor identify the timing of, any obligation in relation to such claims and therefore no amount has been provided as at 31 December 2015. There are also agreements indemnifying certain third-party contractors in relation to litigation costs and certain other claims. A contingent liability also exists in relation to other obligations under these agreements.
120 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
2. Significant event Gulf of Mexico oil spill continued
The magnitude and timing of all possible obligations in relation to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill continue to be subject to a high degree of uncertainty. Any such possible obligations are therefore contingent liabilities and, at present, it is not practicable to estimate their magnitude or possible timing of payment. Furthermore, other material unanticipated obligations may arise in future in relation to the incident.
Impact upon the group income statement
The amount of the provision recognized during the year can be reconciled to the charge to the income statement as follows:
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
Cumulative since
the incident |
|||||||||||||||
Net increase in provision |
11,886 | 1,327 | 1,860 | 56,591 | ||||||||||||||
Change in discount rate relating to provisions |
(333 | ) | 2 | (5 | ) | (314 | ) | |||||||||||
Costs charged directly to the income statement |
156 | 114 | 136 | 4,514 | ||||||||||||||
Trust fund liability discounted |
| | | 19,580 | ||||||||||||||
Change in discounting relating to trust fund liability |
| | | 283 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of reimbursement asset, net |
| (662 | ) | (1,542 | ) | (20,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Settlements credited to the income statement |
| | (19 | ) | (5,681 | ) | ||||||||||||
(Profit) loss before interest and taxation |
11,709 | 781 | 430 | 54,973 | ||||||||||||||
Finance costs |
247 | 38 | 39 | 478 | ||||||||||||||
(Profit) loss before taxation |
11,956 | 819 | 469 | 55,451 |
The group income statement for 2015 includes a pre-tax charge of $11,956 million (2014 pre-tax charge of $819 million) in relation to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. The costs charged within production and manufacturing expenses in 2015 include $9.4 billion for the amounts provided under the Agreements, as well as the ongoing costs of operating the Gulf Coast Restoration Organization (GCRO), business economic loss claims, claims administration costs, legal and litigation costs. Finance costs of $247 million (2014 $38 million) reflect the unwinding of the discount on payables and provisions. The cumulative amount charged to the income statement to date comprises spill response costs arising in the aftermath of the incident, amounts charged for the Agreements, GCRO operating costs, amounts charged upon initial recognition of the trust obligation, litigation, claims, environmental and legal costs not paid through the Trust and estimated obligations for future costs that can be estimated reliably at this time, net of settlements agreed with the co-owners of the Macondo well and other third parties.
The total amount recognized in the income statement is analysed in the table below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 |
Cumulative since
the incident |
|||||||||||||||
Trust fund liability discounted |
| | | 19,580 | ||||||||||||||
Change in discounting relating to trust fund liability |
| | | 283 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of reimbursement asset |
| (662 | ) | (1,542 | ) | (20,000 | ) | |||||||||||
Other |
| | | 8 | ||||||||||||||
Total (credit) charge relating to the trust fund |
| (662 | ) | (1,542 | ) | (129 | ) | |||||||||||
Environmental amount provided |
5,393 | 190 | 47 | 8,527 | ||||||||||||||
change in discount rate relating to provisions |
(149 | ) | 2 | (5 | ) | (130 | ) | |||||||||||
costs charged directly to the income statement |
59 | | | 129 | ||||||||||||||
Total charge relating to environmental |
5,303 | 192 | 42 | 8,526 | ||||||||||||||
Spill response amount provided |
| | (113 | ) | 11,465 | |||||||||||||
costs charged directly to the income statement |
| | | 2,839 | ||||||||||||||
Total (credit) charge relating to spill response |
| | (113 | ) | 14,304 | |||||||||||||
Litigation and claims amount provided, net of provision derecognized |
5,832 | 1,137 | 1,926 | 32,428 | ||||||||||||||
change in discount rate relating to provisions |
(74 | ) | | | (74 | ) | ||||||||||||
costs charged directly to the income statement |
| | | 184 | ||||||||||||||
Total charge relating to litigation and claims |
5,758 | 1,137 | 1,926 | 32,538 | ||||||||||||||
Clean Water Act penalties amount provided |
661 | | | 4,171 | ||||||||||||||
change in discount rate relating to provisions |
(110 | ) | | | (110 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total charge relating to Clean Water Act penalties |
551 | | | 4,061 | ||||||||||||||
Other costs charged directly to the income statement |
97 | 114 | 136 | 1,354 | ||||||||||||||
Settlements credited to the income statement |
| | (19 | ) | (5,681 | ) | ||||||||||||
(Profit) loss before interest and taxation |
11,709 | 781 | 430 | 54,973 | ||||||||||||||
Finance costs |
247 | 38 | 39 | 478 | ||||||||||||||
(Profit) loss before taxation |
11,956 | 819 | 469 | 55,451 |
The total amounts that will ultimately be paid by BP in relation to all obligations relating to the incident remains subject to uncertainty as described under Provisions and contingent liabilities above.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 121 |
3. Non-current assets held for sale
On 15 January 2016 BP and Rosneft announced that they had signed a binding agreement to dissolve the German refining joint operation Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG). The restructuring, which is expected to be completed in 2016, will result in the transfer of BPs interests, currently held via ROG, in the Bayernoil, MiRO Karlsruhe and PCK Schwedt refineries to Rosneft. In exchange, BP will take sole ownership of the Gelsenkirchen refinery and the solvent production facility DHC Solvent Chemie, both of which are also currently owned by ROG.
The major classes of assets and liabilities relating to BPs share of ROGs interests in the Bayernoil, MiRO Karlsruhe and PCK Schwedt refineries classified as held for sale at 31 December 2015 were:
$ million | ||||||
2015 | ||||||
Assets |
||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
360 | |||||
Intangible assets |
3 | |||||
Inventories |
215 | |||||
Assets classified as held for sale |
578 | |||||
Liabilities |
||||||
Defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan deficits |
(97 | ) | ||||
Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale |
(97 | ) |
The assets classified as held for sale are reported in the Downstream segment. The associated pension liabilities are reported in Other businesses and corporate.
There were no assets or liabilities classified as held for sale as at 31 December 2014.
The following amounts were recognized in the income statement in respect of disposals and impairments.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
||||||||||||||
Upstream |
324 | 405 | 371 | |||||||||||
Downstream |
316 | 474 | 214 | |||||||||||
TNK-BP |
| | 12,500 | |||||||||||
Other businesses and corporate |
26 | 16 | 30 | |||||||||||
666 | 895 | 13,115 | ||||||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
||||||||||||||
Upstream |
124 | 345 | 144 | |||||||||||
Downstream |
98 | 401 | 78 | |||||||||||
Other businesses and corporate |
41 | 3 | 8 | |||||||||||
263 | 749 | 230 | ||||||||||||
Impairment losses |
||||||||||||||
Upstream |
2,484 | 6,737 | 1,255 | |||||||||||
Downstream |
265 | 1,264 | 484 | |||||||||||
Other businesses and corporate |
155 | 317 | 218 | |||||||||||
2,904 | 8,318 | 1,957 | ||||||||||||
Impairment reversals |
||||||||||||||
Upstream |
(1,080 | ) | (102 | ) | (226 | ) | ||||||||
Downstream |
(178 | ) | | | ||||||||||
(1,258 | ) | (102 | ) | (226 | ) | |||||||||
Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
1,909 | 8,965 | 1,961 |
Disposals
Disposal proceeds and principal gains and losses on disposals by segment are described below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from disposals of fixed assets |
1,066 | 1,820 | 18,115 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from disposals of businesses, net of cash disposed |
1,726 | 1,671 | 3,884 | |||||||||||
2,792 | 3,491 | 21,999 | ||||||||||||
By business |
||||||||||||||
Upstream |
769 | 2,533 | 1,288 | |||||||||||
Downstream |
1,747 | 864 | 3,991 | |||||||||||
TNK-BP |
| | 16,646 | |||||||||||
Other businesses and corporate |
276 | 94 | 74 | |||||||||||
2,792 | 3,491 | 21,999 |
122 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
4. Disposals and impairment continued
At 31 December 2015, deferred consideration relating to disposals amounted to $41 million receivable within one year (2014 $1,137 million and 2013 $23 million) and $385 million receivable after one year (2014 $333 million and 2013 $1,374 million). In addition, contingent consideration receivable relating to disposals amounted to $292 million at 31 December 2015 (2014 $454 million and 2013 $953 million), see Note 29 for further information.
Upstream
In 2015, gains principally resulted from the sale of our interests in the Central Area Transmission System in the North Sea, and from adjustments to prior year disposals in Canada.
In 2014, gains principally resulted from the sale of certain onshore assets in the US, and the sale of certain interests in the Gulf of Mexico and the North Sea. Losses principally arose from adjustments to prior year disposals in Canada and the North Sea.
In 2013, gains principally resulted from the sale of certain of our interests in the central North Sea, and the Yacheng field in China.
Downstream
In 2015, gains principally resulted from the disposal of our investment in the UTA European fuel cards business and our Australian bitumen business.
In 2014, gains principally resulted from the disposal of our global aviation turbine oils business. Losses principally arose from costs associated with the decision to cease refining operations at Bulwer Island in Australia.
In 2013, gains principally resulted from the disposal of our global LPG business and closing adjustments on the sales of the Texas City and Carson refineries with their associated marketing and logistics assets.
TNK-BP
In 2013, BP disposed of its 50% interest in TNK-BP to Rosneft, resulting in a gain on disposal of $12,500 million.
Summarized financial information relating to the sale of businesses is shown in the table below. The principal transactions categorized as business disposals in 2015 were the sales of our interests in the Central Area Transmission System in the North Sea and in the UTA European fuel cards business. The principal transaction categorized as a business disposal in 2014 was the sale of certain of our interests on the North Slope of Alaska in our upstream business. The principal transactions categorized as business disposals in 2013 were the sales of the Texas City and Carson refineries with their associated marketing and logistics assets. Information relating to sales of fixed assets is excluded from the table.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
154 | 1,452 | 2,124 | |||||||||||
Current assets |
80 | 182 | 2,371 | |||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
(70 | ) | (395 | ) | (94 | ) | ||||||||
Current liabilities |
(50 | ) | (65 | ) | (62 | ) | ||||||||
Total carrying amount of net assets disposed |
114 | 1,174 | 4,339 | |||||||||||
Recycling of foreign exchange on disposal |
16 | (7 | ) | 23 | ||||||||||
Costs on disposal a |
8 | 128 | 13 | |||||||||||
138 | 1,295 | 4,375 | ||||||||||||
Gains on sale of businesses |
446 | 280 | 69 | |||||||||||
Total consideration |
584 | 1,575 | 4,444 | |||||||||||
Consideration received (receivable) b |
1,116 | 96 | (414 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of businesses related to completed transactions |
1,700 | 1,671 | 4,030 | |||||||||||
Deposits c |
26 | | (146 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from the sale of businesses |
1,726 | 1,671 | 3,884 |
a | 2013 includes pension and other post-retirement benefit plan curtailment gains of $109 million. |
b | Consideration received from prior year business disposals or to be received from current year disposals. 2015 includes $1,079 million of proceeds from our Toledo refinery partner, Husky Energy, in place of capital commitments relating to the original divestment transaction that have not been subsequently sanctioned. 2013 includes contingent consideration of $475 million relating to the disposal of the Texas City refinery. |
c | Proceeds received in the current year in advance of business disposals, less deposits received in prior years in relation to business disposals completed in the current year. |
Impairments
Impairment losses and impairment reversals in each segment are described below. For information on significant estimates and judgements made in relation to impairments see Impairment of property, plant and equipment, intangibles and goodwill within Note 1. For information on impairments recognized by joint ventures see Note 15.
Upstream
The 2015 impairment losses of $2,484 million included $761 million in Angola, of which $371 million related to the Greater Plutonio cash-generating unit (CGU), which has a recoverable amount of $2,222 million. Impairment losses also included $830 million in relation to CGUs in the North Sea, of which $328 million relates to the Andrew area CGU, which has a recoverable amount of $766 million. The impairment losses primarily arose as a result of a lower price environment in the near term, and were also affected to a lesser extent by certain technical reserves revisions and increases in decommissioning cost estimates. The 2015 impairment reversals of $1,080 million included $945 million in the North Sea business, of which $473 million related to the Eastern Trough Area Project (ETAP) CGU, which has a recoverable amount of $2,489 million. The impairment reversals mainly arose as a result of decreases in cost estimates and a reduction in the discount rate applied, offsetting the impact of lower prices in the near term. Impairment losses and reversals relate to producing assets. The recoverable amounts of the Greater Plutonio CGU, the Andrew area CGU, and the ETAP CGU are their values in use. See Impairment of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and goodwill within Note 1 for further information on assumptions used for impairment testing. The discount rate used to determine the recoverable amount of the Greater Plutonio CGU included the 2% premium for higher-risk countries as described in Note 1; a premium was not applied in determining the recoverable amount of the other CGUs.
The 2014 impairment losses of $6,737 million included $4,876 million in relation to CGUs in the North Sea, of which $1,964 million related to the Valhall CGU, $660 million related to the Andrew area CGU, and $515 million related to the ETAP CGU. Impairment losses also included an $859-million impairment of our PSVM CGU in Angola, and a $415-million impairment of the Block KG D6 CGU in India. All of the impairments related to producing
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 123 |
4. Disposals and impairment continued
assets. The impairments in the North Sea and Angola arose as a result of a lower price environment in the near term, technical reserves revisions, and increases in expected decommissioning cost estimates. The impairment of Block KG D6 arose following the introduction of a new formula for Indian gas prices. The discount rate used to determine the value in use of the PSVM CGU included the 2% premium for higher-risk countries. A premium was not applied in determining the recoverable amount of the other CGUs.
The main elements of the 2013 impairment losses of $1,255 million were a $251-million impairment loss relating to the Browse project in Australia and a $253-million aggregate write-down of a number of assets in the North Sea, caused by increases in expected decommissioning costs. Impairment reversals arose on certain of our interests in Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, and the North Sea, triggered by reductions in decommissioning provisions due to continued review of the expected decommissioning costs and an increase in the discount rate for provisions.
Downstream
The 2015 impairment losses of $265 million arose principally in relation to certain manufacturing assets in our petrochemicals business and certain US midstream assets, where the expected disposal proceeds were lower than the book values.
The 2014 impairment losses of $1,264 million principally related to our Bulwer Island refinery and certain midstream assets in our fuels business, and certain manufacturing assets in our petrochemicals business.
The 2013 impairment losses of $484 million principally related to impairments of certain refineries in the US and elsewhere in our global fuels portfolio.
Other businesses and corporate
Impairment losses totalling $155 million, $317 million, and $218 million were recognized in 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively. The amount for 2015 is principally in respect of our US wind business. The amount for 2014 is principally in respect of our biofuels businesses in the UK and US. The amount for 2013 is principally in respect of our US wind business.
The groups organizational structure reflects the various activities in which BP is engaged. At 31 December 2015, BP had three reportable segments: Upstream, Downstream and Rosneft.
Upstreams activities include oil and natural gas exploration, field development and production; midstream transportation, storage and processing; and the marketing and trading of natural gas, including liquefied natural gas (LNG), together with power and natural gas liquids (NGLs).
Downstreams activities include the refining, manufacturing, marketing, transportation, and supply and trading of crude oil, petroleum, petrochemicals products and related services to wholesale and retail customers.
During 2013, BP completed transactions for the sale of BPs interest in TNK-BP to Rosneft, and for BPs further investment in Rosneft. BPs interest in Rosneft is accounted for using the equity method and is reported as a separate operating segment, reflecting the way in which the investment is managed.
Other businesses and corporate comprises the biofuels and wind businesses, the groups shipping and treasury functions, and corporate activities worldwide.
The Gulf Coast Restoration Organization (GCRO), which manages aspects of our response to the 2010 Gulf of Mexico incident, was overseen by a board committee for all periods presented, however it is not an operating segment. Its costs are presented as a reconciling item between the sum of the results of the reportable segments and the group results. From 2016, we intend to report GCRO as part of Other businesses and corporate.
The accounting policies of the operating segments are the same as the groups accounting policies described in Note 1. However, IFRS requires that the measure of profit or loss disclosed for each operating segment is the measure that is provided regularly to the chief operating decision maker for the purposes of performance assessment and resource allocation. For BP, this measure of profit or loss is replacement cost profit or loss before interest and tax which reflects the replacement cost of supplies by excluding from profit or loss inventory holding gains and losses a . Replacement cost profit or loss for the group is not a recognized measure under IFRS.
Sales between segments are made at prices that approximate market prices, taking into account the volumes involved. Segment revenues and segment results include transactions between business segments. These transactions and any unrealized profits and losses are eliminated on consolidation, unless unrealized losses provide evidence of an impairment of the asset transferred. Sales to external customers by region are based on the location of the group subsidiary which made the sale. The UK region includes the UK-based international activities of Downstream.
All surpluses and deficits recognized on the group balance sheet in respect of pension and other post-retirement benefit plans are allocated to Other businesses and corporate. However, the periodic expense relating to these plans is allocated to the operating segments based upon the business in which the employees work.
Certain financial information is provided separately for the US as this is an individually material country for BP, and for the UK as this is BPs country of domicile.
a | Inventory holding gains and losses represent the difference between the cost of sales calculated using the replacement cost of inventory and the cost of sales calculated on the first-in first-out (FIFO) method after adjusting for any changes in provisions where the net realizable value of the inventory is lower than its cost. Under the FIFO method, which we use for IFRS reporting, the cost of inventory charged to the income statement is based on its historical cost of purchase or manufacture, rather than its replacement cost. In volatile energy markets, this can have a significant distorting effect on reported income. The amounts disclosed represent the difference between the charge to the income statement for inventory on a FIFO basis (after adjusting for any related movements in net realizable value provisions) and the charge that would have arisen based on the replacement cost of inventory. For this purpose, the replacement cost of inventory is calculated using data from each operations production and manufacturing system, either on a monthly basis, or separately for each transaction where the system allows this approach. The amounts disclosed are not separately reflected in the financial statements as a gain or loss. No adjustment is made in respect of the cost of inventories held as part of a trading position and certain other temporary inventory positions. |
124 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
5. Segmental analysis continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
By business | Upstream | Downstream | Rosneft |
Other
businesses and corporate |
Gulf of
Mexico oil spill response |
Consolidation
adjustment and eliminations |
Total
group |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
43,235 | 200,569 | | 2,048 | | (22,958 | ) | 222,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: sales and other operating revenues between segments |
(21,949 | ) | (68 | ) | | (941 | ) | | 22,958 | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Third party sales and other operating revenues |
21,286 | 200,501 | | 1,107 | | | 222,894 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings from joint ventures and associates after interest and tax |
192 | 491 | 1,330 | (202 | ) | | | 1,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment results |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Replacement cost profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
(937 | ) | 7,111 | 1,310 | (1,768 | ) | (11,709 | ) | (36 | ) | (6,029 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Inventory holding gains (losses) a |
(30 | ) | (1,863 | ) | 4 | | | | (1,889 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
(967 | ) | 5,248 | 1,314 | (1,768 | ) | (11,709 | ) | (36 | ) | (7,918 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Finance costs |
(1,347 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net finance expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
(306 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
(9,571 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income statement items |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US |
4,007 | 906 | | 77 | | | 4,990 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-US |
8,866 | 1,162 | | 201 | | | 10,229 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Charges for provisions, net of write-back of unused provisions, including change in discount rate |
824 | 611 | | 228 | 11,553 | | 13,216 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in joint ventures and associates |
8,304 | 3,214 | 5,797 | 519 | | | 17,834 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to non-current assets b |
17,635 | 2,130 | | 315 | | | 20,080 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to other investments |
35 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element of acquisitions not related to non-current assets |
(31 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to decommissioning asset |
(553 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions, on an accruals basis |
17,082 | 2,109 | | 340 | | | 19,531 |
a | See explanation of inventory holding gains and losses on page 124. |
b | Includes additions to property, plant and equipment; goodwill; intangible assets; investments in joint ventures; and investments in associates. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 125 |
5. Segmental analysis continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
By business | Upstream | Downstream | Rosneft |
Other
businesses and corporate |
Gulf of
Mexico oil spill response |
Consolidation
adjustment and eliminations |
Total
group |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
65,424 | 323,486 | | 1,989 | | (37,331 | ) | 353,568 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: sales and other operating revenues between segments |
(36,643 | ) | 173 | | (861 | ) | | 37,331 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Third party sales and other operating revenues |
28,781 | 323,659 | | 1,128 | | | 353,568 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings from joint ventures and associates after interest and tax |
1,089 | 265 | 2,101 | (83 | ) | | | 3,372 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment results |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Replacement cost profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
8,934 | 3,738 | 2,100 | (2,010 | ) | (781 | ) | 641 | 12,622 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Inventory holding gains (losses) a |
(86 | ) | (6,100 | ) | (24 | ) | | | | (6,210 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
8,848 | (2,362 | ) | 2,076 | (2,010 | ) | (781 | ) | 641 | 6,412 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Finance costs |
(1,148 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net finance expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
(314 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
4,950 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income statement items |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization b |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US |
4,129 | 984 | | 97 | | | 5,210 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-US |
8,404 | 1,336 | | 213 | | | 9,953 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Charges for provisions, net of write-back of unused provisions, including change in discount rate |
260 | 713 | | 323 | 1,329 | | 2,625 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in joint ventures and associates |
7,877 | 3,244 | 7,312 | 723 | | | 19,156 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to non-current assets c |
22,587 | 3,121 | | 784 | | | 26,492 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to other investments |
160 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element of acquisitions not related to non-current assets |
(366 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to decommissioning asset |
(2,505 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions, on an accruals basis |
19,772 | 3,106 | | 903 | | | 23,781 |
a | See explanation of inventory holding gains and losses on page 124. |
b | It is estimated that the benefit arising from the absence of depreciation for the assets held for sale during the year was $221 million. |
c | Includes additions to property, plant and equipment; goodwill; intangible assets; investments in joint ventures; and investments in associates. |
126 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
5. Segmental analysis continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
By business | Upstream | Downstream | Rosneft | TNK-BP |
Other
businesses and corporate |
Gulf of
Mexico oil spill response |
Consolidation
adjustment and eliminations |
Total
group |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
70,374 | 351,195 | | | 1,805 | | (44,238 | ) | 379,136 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: sales and other operating revenues between segments |
(42,327 | ) | (1,045 | ) | | | (866 | ) | | 44,238 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Third party sales and other operating revenues |
28,047 | 350,150 | | | 939 | | | 379,136 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings from joint ventures and associates after interest and tax |
1,027 | 195 | 2,058 | | (91 | ) | | | 3,189 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment results |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Replacement cost profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
16,657 | 2,919 | 2,153 | 12,500 | (2,319 | ) | (430 | ) | 579 | 32,059 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventory holding gains (losses) a |
4 | (194 | ) | (100 | ) | | | | | (290 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
16,661 | 2,725 | 2,053 | 12,500 | (2,319 | ) | (430 | ) | 579 | 31,769 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance costs |
(1,068 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net finance expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
(480 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
30,221 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income statement items |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization b |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US |
3,538 | 747 | | | 181 | | | 4,466 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-US |
7,514 | 1,343 | | | 187 | | | 9,044 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charges for provisions, net of write-back of unused provisions, including change in discount rate |
161 | 270 | | | 295 | 1,855 | | 2,581 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Segment assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments in joint ventures and associates |
7,780 | 3,302 | 13,681 | | 1,072 | | | 25,835 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to non-current assets c |
19,499 | 4,449 | 11,941 | | 1,027 | | | 36,916 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to other investments |
41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Element of acquisitions not related to non-current assets |
39 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additions to decommissioning asset |
(384 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions, on an accruals basis |
19,115 | 4,506 | 11,941 | | 1,050 | | | 36,612 |
a | See explanation of inventory holding gains and losses on page 124. |
b | It is estimated that the benefit arising from the absence of depreciation for the assets held for sale at 31 December 2012 until their disposal in 2013 amounted to approximately $201 million. |
c | Includes additions to property, plant and equipment; goodwill; intangible assets; investments in joint ventures; and investments in associates. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 127 |
5. Segmental analysis continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||
By geographical area | US | Non-US | Total | |||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||
Third party sales and other operating revenues a |
74,162 | 148,732 | 222,894 | |||||||||||
Other income statement items |
||||||||||||||
Production and similar taxes |
215 | 821 | 1,036 | |||||||||||
Results |
||||||||||||||
Replacement cost profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
(12,243 | ) | 6,214 | (6,029 | ) | |||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||||
Non-current assets b c |
67,776 | 111,106 | 178,882 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions, on an accruals basis |
5,332 | 14,199 | 19,531 |
a | Non-US region includes UK $51,550 million. |
b | Non-US region includes UK $19,152 million. |
c | Includes property, plant and equipment; goodwill; intangible assets; investments in joint ventures; investments in associates; and non-current prepayments. |
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||
By geographical area | US | Non-US | Total | |||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||
Third party sales and other operating revenues a |
122,951 | 230,617 | 353,568 | |||||||||||
Other income statement items |
||||||||||||||
Production and similar taxes |
690 | 2,268 | 2,958 | |||||||||||
Results |
||||||||||||||
Replacement cost profit before interest and taxation |
5,251 | 7,371 | 12,622 | |||||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||||
Non-current assets b c |
69,125 | 114,462 | 183,587 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions, on an accruals basis |
7,227 | 16,554 | 23,781 |
a | Non-US region includes UK $77,522 million. |
b | Non-US region includes UK $18,430 million. |
c | Includes property, plant and equipment; goodwill; intangible assets; investments in joint ventures; investments in associates; and non-current prepayments. |
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2013 | ||||||||||||||
By geographical area | US | Non-US | Total | |||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||
Third party sales and other operating revenues a |
128,764 | 250,372 | 379,136 | |||||||||||
Other income statement items |
||||||||||||||
Production and similar taxes |
1,112 | 5,935 | 7,047 | |||||||||||
Results |
||||||||||||||
Replacement cost profit before interest and taxation |
3,114 | 28,945 | 32,059 | |||||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||||
Non-current assets b c |
70,228 | 124,439 | 194,667 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions, on an accruals basis |
9,176 | 27,436 | 36,612 |
a | Non-US region includes UK $82,381 million. |
b | Non-US region includes UK $18,967 million. |
c | Includes property, plant and equipment; goodwill; intangible assets; investments in joint ventures; investments in associates; and non-current prepayments. |
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
||||||||||||||
Interest income |
226 | 258 | 282 | |||||||||||
Other income |
385 | 585 | 495 | |||||||||||
611 | 843 | 777 | ||||||||||||
Currency exchange losses charged to the income statement a |
8 | 36 | 180 | |||||||||||
Expenditure on research and development |
418 | 663 | 707 | |||||||||||
Finance costs |
||||||||||||||
Interest payable |
1,065 | 1,025 | 1,082 | |||||||||||
Capitalized at 1.75% (2014 1.94% and 2013 2%) b |
(179 | ) | (185 | ) | (238 | ) | ||||||||
Unwinding of discount on provisions and other payables |
461 | 308 | 224 | |||||||||||
1,347 | 1,148 | 1,068 |
a | Excludes exchange gains and losses arising on financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss. |
b | Tax relief on capitalized interest is approximately $42 million (2014 $43 million and 2013 $62 million). |
128 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
7. Exploration for and evaluation of oil and natural gas resources
The following financial information represents the amounts included within the group totals relating to activity associated with the exploration for and evaluation of oil and natural gas resources. All such activity is recorded within the Upstream segment.
For information on significant estimates and judgements made in relation to oil and natural gas accounting see Intangible assets within Note 1.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Exploration and evaluation costs |
||||||||||||||
Exploration expenditure written off a |
1,829 | 3,029 | 2,710 | |||||||||||
Other exploration costs |
524 | 603 | 731 | |||||||||||
Exploration expense for the year |
2,353 | 3,632 | 3,441 | |||||||||||
Impairment losses |
| | 253 | |||||||||||
Intangible assets exploration and appraisal expenditure |
17,286 | 19,344 | 20,865 | |||||||||||
Liabilities |
145 | 227 | 212 | |||||||||||
Net assets |
17,141 | 19,117 | 20,653 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditure, on an accruals basis |
1,197 | 2,870 | 4,464 | |||||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
524 | 603 | 731 | |||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
1,216 | 2,786 | 4,275 |
a | 2015 included a $432-million write-off in Libya as there is significant uncertainty about the timing of future drilling operations. It also includes a $345-million write-off relating to the Gila discovery in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico and a $336-million write-off relating to the Pandora discovery in Angola as development of these prospects is considered challenging. 2014 included a $544-million write-off relating to disappointing appraisal results of Utica shale in the US Lower 48 and the subsequent decision not to proceed with its development plans, a $524-million write-off relating to the Bourarhat Sud block licence in the Illizi Basin of Algeria, a $395-million write-off relating to Block KG D6 in India and a $295-million write-off relating to the Moccasin discovery in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico. 2013 included a $845-million write-off relating to the value ascribed to Block BM-CAL-13 offshore Brazil as a result of the Pitanga exploration well not encountering commercial quantities of oil and gas and a $257-million write-off of costs relating to the Risha concession in Jordan as our exploration activities did not establish the technical basis for a development project in the concession. For further information see Upstream Exploration on page 30. |
The carrying amount, by location, of exploration and appraisal expenditure capitalized as intangible assets at 31 December 2015 is shown in the table below.
Carrying amount | Location | |||||
$1 - 2 billion |
Angola; India | |||||
$2 - 3 billion |
Canada; Egypt; Brazil | |||||
$3 - 4 billion |
US Gulf of Mexico |
Tax on profit
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Current tax |
||||||||||||||
Charge for the year |
1,910 | 4,444 | 5,724 | |||||||||||
Adjustment in respect of prior years |
(329 | ) | 48 | 61 | ||||||||||
1,581 | 4,492 | 5,785 | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax |
||||||||||||||
Origination and reversal of temporary differences in the current year |
(5,090 | ) | (3,194 | ) | 529 | |||||||||
Adjustment in respect of prior years |
338 | (351 | ) | 149 | ||||||||||
(4,752 | ) | (3,545 | ) | 678 | ||||||||||
Tax charge (credit) on profit or loss |
(3,171 | ) | 947 | 6,463 |
In 2015, the total tax charge recognized within other comprehensive income was $1,140 million (2014 $1,481 million credit and 2013 $1,374 million charge). See Note 31 for further information. The total tax charge recognized directly in equity was $9 million (2014 $36 million charge and 2013 $33 million credit).
For information on significant estimates and judgements made in relation to taxation see Income taxes within Note 1. For information on contingent liabilities in relation to taxation see Note 32.
Reconciliation of the effective tax rate
The following table provides a reconciliation of the UK statutory corporation tax rate to the effective tax rate of the group on profit or loss before taxation. With effect from 1 April 2015 the UK statutory corporation tax rate reduced from 21% to 20% on profits arising from activities outside the North Sea.
For 2015, the items presented in the reconciliation are affected as a result of the overall tax credit for the year and the loss before taxation. In order to provide a more meaningful analysis of the effective tax rate, the table also presents separate reconciliations for the group excluding the impacts of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and impairment losses, and for the impacts of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and impairment losses in isolation.
For 2014, the items presented in the reconciliation are affected as a result of the tax credits related to the impairment losses recognized in the year and the effect of the impairment losses on the profit for the year. In order to provide a more meaningful analysis of the effective tax rate for 2014, the table also presents separate reconciliations for the group excluding the effects of the impairment losses, and for the effects of the impairment losses in isolation.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 129 |
8. Taxation continued
For 2013, the effective tax rate is not affected significantly by impairment losses or the impact of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015
excluding impacts of Gulf of Mexico oil spill and impairments |
2015
impacts of Gulf of Mexico oil spill and impairments |
2015 |
2014
excluding impairments |
2014
impacts of impairments |
2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
4,031 | (13,602 | ) | (9,571 | ) | 13,166 | (8,216 | ) | 4,950 | 30,221 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tax charge (credit) on profit or loss |
945 | (4,116 | ) | (3,171 | ) | 5,036 | (4,089 | ) | 947 | 6,463 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Effective tax rate |
23% | 30% | 33% | 38% | 50% | 19% | 21% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
% of profit or loss before taxation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK statutory corporation tax rate |
20 | 20 | 20 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) resulting from |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK supplementary and overseas taxes at higher or lower rates a |
| 18 | 25 | 17 | 34 | (11 | ) | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax reported in equity-accounted entities |
(10 | ) | | 4 | (5 | ) | | (14 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments in respect of prior years |
1 | | | (2 | ) | | (6 | ) | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Movement in deferred tax not recognized |
17 | (5 | ) | (14 | ) | 4 | (3 | ) | 17 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Tax incentives for investment |
(8 | ) | | 3 | (4 | ) | | (10 | ) | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Gulf of Mexico oil spill non-deductible costs |
| (2 | ) | (3 | ) | | | 1 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Permanent differences relating to disposals |
(3 | ) | | 1 | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | (8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange |
18 | | (8 | ) | 4 | | 10 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Items not deductible for tax purposes |
10 | | (4 | ) | 4 | (2 | ) | 12 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease in rate of UK supplementary charge b |
(23 | ) | | 10 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
1 | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Effective tax rate |
23 | 30 | 33 | 38 | 50 | 19 | 21 |
a | For 2015 excluding impacts of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and impairments, the most significant countries impacting upon the rate were the US (with an applicable statutory tax rate of 35%), Angola (50%), Germany (32%), Indonesia (42%) and UK North Sea (50%). However because there were profits in some countries and losses in others, the net impact on the effective tax rate reconciliation was less than 1%. For 2014 excluding impairments, jurisdictions which contribute significantly to this item are Angola (50%), Trinidad (55%) and the US (35%). For 2013, jurisdictions which contribute significantly are Angola, the UK North Sea and Trinidad, with applicable statutory tax rates of 50%, 62% and 55% respectively. |
b | For 2015, this relates to the one-off deferred tax impact of the enactment of legislation to reduce the UK supplementary charge tax rate applicable to profits arising in the North Sea from 32% to 20%. |
Deferred tax
$ million | ||||||||||
Analysis of movements during the year in the net deferred tax liability | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
At 1 January |
11,584 | 16,454 | ||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
86 | 122 | ||||||||
Charge (credit) for the year in the income statement |
(4,752 | ) | (3,545 | ) | ||||||
Charge (credit) for the year in other comprehensive income |
1,140 | (1,563 | ) | |||||||
Charge (credit) for the year in equity |
9 | 36 | ||||||||
Acquisitions and disposals |
(13 | ) | 80 | |||||||
At 31 December |
8,054 | 11,584 |
The following table provides an analysis of deferred tax in the income statement and the balance sheet by category of temporary difference:
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income statement | Balance sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax liability |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
(102 | ) | (2,178 | ) | (474 | ) | 28,712 | 29,062 | ||||||||||||||
Pension plan surpluses |
84 | (272 | ) | (691 | ) | 878 | | |||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
(326 | ) | 527 | 99 | 961 | 1,089 | ||||||||||||||||
Other taxable temporary differences |
59 | (1,805 | ) | (298 | ) | 1,266 | 1,356 | |||||||||||||||
(285 | ) | (3,728 | ) | (1,364 | ) | 31,817 | 31,507 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred tax asset |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan deficits |
12 | 492 | 787 | (1,972 | ) | (2,761 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Decommissioning, environmental and other provisions |
(2,513 | ) | 52 | 1,385 | (13,737 | ) | (11,237 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
62 | 166 | 30 | (710 | ) | (575 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Tax credits |
256 | 589 | (174 | ) | (43 | ) | (298 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Loss carry forward |
(2,239 | ) | (1,397 | ) | (343 | ) | (5,985 | ) | (3,848 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other deductible temporary differences |
(45 | ) | 281 | 357 | (1,316 | ) | (1,204 | ) | ||||||||||||||
(4,467 | ) | 183 | 2,042 | (23,763 | ) | (19,923 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net deferred tax charge (credit) and net deferred tax liability |
(4,752 | ) | (3,545 | ) | 678 | 8,054 | 11,584 | |||||||||||||||
Of which deferred tax liabilities |
9,599 | 13,893 | ||||||||||||||||||||
deferred tax assets |
1,545 | 2,309 |
130 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
8. Taxation continued
The recognition of deferred tax assets of $1,067 million (2014 $1,467 million), in entities which have suffered a loss in either the current or preceding period, is supported by forecasts which indicate that sufficient future taxable profits will be available to utilize such assets.
A summary of temporary differences, unused tax credits and unused tax losses for which deferred tax has not been recognized is shown in the table below.
$ billion | ||||||||||
At 31 December | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Unused US state tax losses a |
9.6 | 9.0 | ||||||||
Unused tax losses other jurisdictions b |
2.1 | 2.1 | ||||||||
Unused tax credits |
20.4 | 20.1 | ||||||||
of which arising in the UK c |
17.5 | 18.0 | ||||||||
arising in the US d |
2.8 | 2.0 | ||||||||
Deductible temporary differences e |
23.2 | 17.9 | ||||||||
Taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities |
3.9 | 1.0 |
a | Of the gross unused tax losses on which no deferred tax is recognized, $9.6 billion relates to US state taxes which expire in the period 2016-2035 with applicable tax rates ranging from 5% to 12%. An amendment has been made to the comparative amount. |
b | The majority of the unused tax losses have no fixed expiry date. |
c | The UK unused tax credits arise predominantly in overseas branches of UK entities based in jurisdictions with high tax rates. No deferred tax asset has been recognized on these tax credits as they are unlikely to have value in the future; UK taxes on these overseas branches are largely mitigated by double tax relief on the overseas tax. These tax credits have no fixed expiry date. |
d | The US unused tax credits expire in the period 2016-2025. |
e | Primarily comprises fixed asset temporary differences. Substantially all of the temporary differences have no expiry date. |
$ million | ||||||||||||||
Impact of previously unrecognized deferred tax or write-down of deferred tax assets on current year charge | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||
Current tax benefit relating to the utilization of previously unrecognized tax credits and losses |
123 | 171 | 216 | |||||||||||
Deferred tax benefit relating to the recognition of previously unrecognized tax credits and losses |
| | 178 | |||||||||||
Deferred tax expense arising from the write-down of a previously recognized deferred tax asset |
768 | 153 | |
The quarterly dividend expected to be paid on 24 March 2016 in respect of the fourth quarter 2015 is 10 cents per ordinary share ($0.60 per American Depositary Share (ADS)). The corresponding amount in sterling will be announced on 14 March 2016. A scrip dividend alternative is available, allowing shareholders to elect to receive their dividend in the form of new ordinary shares and ADS holders in the form of new ADSs.
Pence per share | Cents per share | $ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends announced and paid in cash |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preference shares |
2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary shares |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March |
6.6699 | 5.7065 | 6.0013 | 10.00 | 9.50 | 9.00 | 1,708 | 1,426 | 1,621 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June |
6.5295 | 5.8071 | 5.8342 | 10.00 | 9.75 | 9.00 | 1,691 | 1,572 | 1,399 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September |
6.5488 | 5.9593 | 5.7630 | 10.00 | 9.75 | 9.00 | 1,717 | 1,122 | 1,245 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December |
6.6342 | 6.3769 | 5.8008 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 9.50 | 1,541 | 1,728 | 1,174 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
26.3824 | 23.8498 | 23.3993 | 40.00 | 39.00 | 36.50 | 6,659 | 5,850 | 5,441 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend announced, payable in March 2016 |
10.00 | 1,841 |
The details of the scrip dividends issued are shown in the table below.
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Number of shares issued (thousand) |
102,810 | 165,644 | 202,124 | |||||||||||
Value of shares issued ($ million) |
642 | 1,318 | 1,470 |
The financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2015 do not reflect the dividend announced on 2 February 2016 and expected to be paid in March 2016; this will be treated as an appropriation of profit in the year ended 31 December 2016.
10. Earnings per ordinary share
Cents per share | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
(35.39 | ) | 20.55 | 123.87 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
(35.39 | ) | 20.42 | 123.12 |
Basic earnings per ordinary share amounts are calculated by dividing the profit (loss) for the year attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year. The average number of shares outstanding includes certain shares that will be issuable in the future under employee share-based payment plans and excludes treasury shares, which includes shares held by the Employee Share Ownership Plan trusts (ESOPs).
For the diluted earnings per share calculation, the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year is adjusted for the average number of shares that are potentially issuable in connection with employee share-based payment plans using the treasury stock method. If the inclusion of potentially issuable shares would decrease loss per share, the potentially issuable shares are excluded from the weighted average number of shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per share. A dilutive effect relating to potentially issuable shares has not been included, therefore, in the calculation of diluted earnings per share for 2015.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 131 |
10. Earnings per ordinary share continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Profit (loss) attributable to BP shareholders |
(6,482 | ) | 3,780 | 23,451 | ||||||||||
Less: dividend requirements on preference shares |
2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP ordinary shareholders |
(6,484 | ) | 3,778 | 23,449 |
Shares thousand | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Basic weighted average number of ordinary shares |
18,323,646 | 18,385,458 | 18,931,021 | |||||||||||
Potential dilutive effect of ordinary shares issuable under employee share-based payment plans |
| 111,836 | 115,152 | |||||||||||
18,323,646 | 18,497,294 | 19,046,173 |
The number of ordinary shares outstanding at 31 December 2015, excluding treasury shares, and including certain shares that will be issuable in the future under employee share-based payment plans was 18,412,392,432. Between 31 December 2015 and 16 February 2016, the latest practicable date before the completion of these financial statements, there was a net increase of 12,765,658 in the number of ordinary shares outstanding as a result of share issues in relation to employee share-based payment plans.
Employee share-based payment plans
The group operates share and share option plans for directors and certain employees to obtain ordinary shares and ADSs in the company. Information on these plans for directors is shown in the Directors remuneration report on pages 76-92.
The following table shows the number of shares potentially issuable under equity-settled employee share option plans, including the number of options outstanding, the number of options exercisable at the end of each year, and the corresponding weighted average exercise prices. The dilutive effect of these plans at 31 December is also shown.
Share options | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||
Number of
thousand |
Weighted
average exercise price $ |
Number of
thousand |
Weighted
average exercise price $ |
|||||||||||||||
Outstanding |
70,049 | 8.54 | 113,206 | 9.62 | ||||||||||||||
Exercisable |
46,520 | 10.21 | 86,211 | 10.89 | ||||||||||||||
Dilutive effect |
2,659 | n/a | 5,570 | n/a |
a | Numbers of options shown are ordinary share equivalents (one ADS is equivalent to six ordinary shares). |
b | At 31 December 2015 the quoted market price of one BP ordinary share was £3.54 (2014 £4.11). |
In addition, the group operates a number of equity-settled employee share plans under which share units are granted to the groups senior leaders and certain other employees. These plans typically have a three-year performance or restricted period during which the units accrue net notional dividends which are treated as having been reinvested. Leaving employment will normally preclude the conversion of units into shares, but special arrangements apply for participants that leave for qualifying reasons. The number of shares that are expected to vest each year under employee share plans are shown in the table below. The dilutive effect of the employee share plans at 31 December is also shown.
Share plans | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Vesting |
Number of
thousand |
Number of
thousand |
||||||||
Within one year |
78,823 | 78,467 | ||||||||
1 to 2 years |
76,779 | 91,993 | ||||||||
2 to 3 years |
89,654 | 80,966 | ||||||||
3 to 4 years |
41,479 | 28,564 | ||||||||
4 to 5 years |
695 | 222 | ||||||||
287,430 | 280,212 | |||||||||
Dilutive effect |
101,984 | 99,917 |
a | Numbers of shares shown are ordinary share equivalents (one ADS is equivalent to six ordinary shares). |
There has been a net increase of 60,530,268 in the number of potential ordinary shares relating to employee share-based payment plans between 31 December 2015 and 16 February 2016.
132 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
11. Property, plant and equipment
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Land and land improvements |
Buildings |
Oil and
gas properties a |
Plant,
machinery and equipment |
Fixtures,
fittings and office equipment |
Transportation |
Oil depots,
storage tanks and service stations |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2015 |
3,415 | 3,061 | 200,514 | 48,815 | 3,031 | 13,819 | 9,046 | 281,701 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(259 | ) | (144 | ) | | (1,828 | ) | (89 | ) | (61 | ) | (772 | ) | (3,153 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
96 | 122 | 14,574 | 1,114 | 129 | 493 | 551 | 17,079 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | 27 | | | | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers |
| | 1,039 | | | | | 1,039 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale |
| (66 | ) | | (1,364 | ) | (31 | ) | | | (1,461 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deletions |
(58 | ) | (96 | ) | (561 | ) | (1,020 | ) | (174 | ) | (213 | ) | (407 | ) | (2,529 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
3,194 | 2,877 | 215,566 | 45,744 | 2,866 | 14,038 | 8,418 | 292,703 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2015 |
639 | 1,197 | 111,175 | 21,358 | 1,983 | 8,933 | 5,724 | 151,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(10 | ) | (51 | ) | | (914 | ) | (56 | ) | (33 | ) | (452 | ) | (1,516 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Charge for the year |
37 | 135 | 12,004 | 1,760 | 238 | 426 | 323 | 14,923 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment losses |
14 | 2 | 2,113 | 225 | 1 | 283 | 7 | 2,645 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment reversals |
| | (1,079 | ) | (2 | ) | | (18 | ) | (159 | ) | (1,258 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers |
| | 21 | | | | | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale |
| (33 | ) | | (1,038 | ) | (24 | ) | | | (1,095 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deletions |
(38 | ) | (93 | ) | (403 | ) | (737 | ) | (58 | ) | (152 | ) | (303 | ) | (1,784 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
642 | 1,157 | 123,831 | 20,652 | 2,084 | 9,439 | 5,140 | 162,945 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net book amount at 31
|
2,552 | 1,720 | 91,735 | 25,092 | 782 | 4,599 | 3,278 | 129,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2014 |
3,375 | 3,027 | 187,691 | 48,912 | 3,176 | 13,314 | 9,961 | 269,456 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(284 | ) | (105 | ) | | (1,737 | ) | (93 | ) | (44 | ) | (871 | ) | (3,134 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
315 | 183 | 18,033 | 2,008 | 258 | 1,049 | 521 | 22,367 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
31 | 22 | | 252 | 3 | | | 308 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers |
| | 993 | | | | | 993 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deletions |
(22 | ) | (66 | ) | (6,203 | ) | (620 | ) | (313 | ) | (500 | ) | (565 | ) | (8,289 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2014 |
3,415 | 3,061 | 200,514 | 48,815 | 3,031 | 13,819 | 9,046 | 281,701 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2014 |
550 | 1,141 | 97,063 | 20,378 | 1,970 | 8,833 | 5,831 | 135,766 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(5 | ) | (46 | ) | | (989 | ) | (56 | ) | (27 | ) | (550 | ) | (1,673 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Charge for the year |
84 | 156 | 11,728 | 1,833 | 267 | 343 | 448 | 14,859 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment losses |
15 | | 6,304 | 625 | | 179 | 504 | 7,627 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment reversals |
| | (19 | ) | | | (83 | ) | | (102 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Deletions |
(5 | ) | (54 | ) | (3,901 | ) | (489 | ) | (198 | ) | (312 | ) | (509 | ) | (5,468 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2014 |
639 | 1,197 | 111,175 | 21,358 | 1,983 | 8,933 | 5,724 | 151,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net book amount at 31 December 2014 |
2,776 | 1,864 | 89,339 | 27,457 | 1,048 | 4,886 | 3,322 | 130,692 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets held under finance leases at net book amount included above | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
| 2 | 84 | 297 | | 242 | | 625 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2014 |
| 3 | 135 | 295 | | 244 | | 677 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets under construction included above | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
27,755 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2014 |
26,429 |
a | For information on significant estimates and judgements made in relation to the estimation of oil and natural reserves see Property, plant and equipment within Note 1. |
Authorized future capital expenditure for property, plant and equipment by group companies for which contracts had been signed at 31 December 2015 amounted to $10,379 million (2014 $14,590 million amended from $15,635 million previously disclosed). BPs share of capital commitments of joint ventures amounted to $586 million (2014 $369 million).
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 133 |
13. Goodwill and impairment review of goodwill
$ million | ||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||
At 1 January |
12,482 | 12,851 | ||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(237 | ) | (278 | ) | ||||||
Acquisitions |
5 | 73 | ||||||||
Deletions |
(14 | ) | (164 | ) | ||||||
At 31 December |
12,236 | 12,482 | ||||||||
Impairment losses |
||||||||||
At 1 January |
614 | 670 | ||||||||
Deletions |
(5 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||||
At 31 December |
609 | 614 | ||||||||
Net book amount at 31 December |
11,627 | 11,868 | ||||||||
Net book amount at 1 January |
11,868 | 12,181 |
Impairment review of goodwill
$ million | ||||||||||
Goodwill at 31 December | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Upstream |
7,812 | 7,819 | ||||||||
Downstream |
3,761 | 3,968 | ||||||||
Other businesses and corporate |
54 | 81 | ||||||||
11,627 | 11,868 |
Goodwill acquired through business combinations has been allocated to groups of cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the acquisition. For Upstream, goodwill is allocated to all oil and gas assets in aggregate at the segment level. For Downstream, goodwill has been allocated to Lubricants and Other.
For information on significant estimates and judgements made in relation to impairments see Impairment of property, plant and equipment, intangibles and goodwill within Note 1.
Upstream
$ million | ||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Goodwill |
7,812 | 7,819 | ||||||||
Excess of recoverable amount over carrying amount |
12,894 | 26,077 |
The table above shows the carrying amount of goodwill for the segment and the excess of the recoverable amount, based upon a fair value less costs of disposal calculation, over the carrying amount (the headroom).
The fair value less costs of disposal is based on the cash flows expected to be generated by the projected oil or natural gas production profiles up to the expected dates of cessation of production of each producing field, based on current estimates of reserves and resources, appropriately risked. Midstream and supply and trading activities and equity-accounted entities are generally not included in the impairment review of goodwill, because they are not part of the grouping of cash-generating units to which the goodwill relates and which is used to monitor the goodwill for internal management purposes. Where such activities form part of a wider Upstream cash-generating unit, they are reflected in the test. The fair value calculation is based primarily on level 3 inputs as defined by the IFRS 13 Fair value measurement hierarchy. As the production profile and related cash flows can be estimated from BPs experience, management believes that the estimated cash flows expected to be generated over the life of each field is the appropriate basis upon which to assess goodwill for impairment. The estimated date of cessation of production depends on the interaction of a number of variables, such as the recoverable quantities of hydrocarbons, the production profile of the hydrocarbons, the cost of the development of the infrastructure necessary to recover the hydrocarbons, production costs, the contractual duration of the production concession and the selling price of the hydrocarbons produced. As each producing field has specific reservoir characteristics and economic circumstances, the cash flows of the fields are computed using appropriate individual economic models and key assumptions agreed by BP management. Capital expenditure, operating costs and expected hydrocarbon production profiles are derived from the business segment plan adjusted for assumptions reflecting the price environment at the time that the test was performed. Estimated production volumes and cash flows up to the date of cessation of production on a field-by-field basis are developed to be consistent with this. The production profiles used are consistent with the reserve and resource volumes approved as part of BPs centrally controlled process for the estimation of proved and probable reserves and total resources. Intangible assets are deemed to have a recoverable amount equal to their carrying amount.
Consistent with prior years, the 2015 review for impairment was carried out during the fourth quarter. The key assumptions used in the fair value less costs of disposal calculation are oil and natural gas prices, production volumes and the discount rate. Oil price assumptions for the first five years reflect the forward market prices at the time that the calculation was prepared. The prices used were, on average, $6.50 per barrel higher than the prices at the end of the year which are disclosed in Note 1. Gas price assumptions used for the first five years were, on average, the same as those disclosed in Note 1. Long-term price assumptions and discount rate assumptions used were as disclosed in Note 1. The fair value less costs of disposal calculations have been prepared solely for the purposes of determining whether the goodwill balance was impaired. Estimated future cash flows were prepared on the basis of certain assumptions prevailing at the time of the test. The actual outcomes may differ from the assumptions made. For example, reserves and resources estimates and production forecasts are subject to revision as further technical information becomes available and economic conditions change, and future commodity prices may differ from the forecasts used in the calculations.
134 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
13. Goodwill and impairment review of goodwill continued
The sensitivities to different variables have been estimated using certain simplifying assumptions. For example, lower oil and gas prices sensitivities do not reflect the specific impacts for each contractual arrangement and will not capture fully any favourable impacts that may arise from cost deflation. Therefore a detailed calculation at any given price or production profile may produce a different result.
It is estimated that if the oil price assumption for all future years (the first five years, and the long-term assumption from 2021 onwards) was approximately $6.50 per barrel lower in each year, this would cause the recoverable amount to be equal to the carrying amount of goodwill and related net non-current assets of the segment. It is estimated that if the gas price assumption for all future years was approximately $0.60 per mmbtu lower in each year, this would cause the recoverable amount to be equal to the carrying amount of goodwill and related net non-current assets of the segment.
Estimated production volumes are based on detailed data for each field and take into account development plans agreed by management as part of the long-term planning process. The average production for the purposes of goodwill impairment testing over the next 15 years is 911mmboe per year (2014 847mmboe per year). It is estimated that if production volume were to be reduced by approximately 3% for this period, this would cause the recoverable amount to be equal to the carrying amount of goodwill and related non-current assets of the segment.
It is estimated that if the post-tax discount rate was approximately 9% for the entire portfolio, an increase of 2% for all countries not classified as higher risk, this would cause the recoverable amount to be equal to the carrying amount of goodwill and related non-current assets of the segment.
Downstream
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lubricants | Other | Total | Lubricants | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
3,109 | 652 | 3,761 | 3,264 | 704 | 3,968 |
Cash flows for each cash-generating unit are derived from the business segment plans, which cover a period of two to five years. To determine the value in use for each of the cash-generating units, cash flows for a period of 10 years are discounted and aggregated with a terminal value.
Lubricants
As permitted by IAS 36, the detailed calculations of Lubricants recoverable amount performed in the most recent detailed calculation in 2013 were used for the 2015 impairment test as the criteria in that standard were considered satisfied: the headroom was substantial in 2013; there have been no significant changes in the assets and liabilities; and the likelihood that the recoverable amount would be less than the carrying amount at the time was remote.
The key assumptions to which the calculation of value in use for the Lubricants unit is most sensitive are operating unit margins, sales volumes, and discount rate. The values assigned to these key assumptions reflect BPs experience. No reasonably possible change in any of these key assumptions would cause the units carrying amount to exceed its recoverable amount. Cash flows beyond the two-year plan period were extrapolated using a nominal 3% growth rate.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and appraisal expenditure a |
Other
intangibles |
Total |
Exploration
and appraisal expenditure a |
Other intangibles |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
21,723 | 4,268 | 25,991 | 21,742 | 3,936 | 25,678 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| (187 | ) | (187 | ) | | (175 | ) | (175 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | | 455 | 455 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Additions |
1,197 | 234 | 1,431 | 2,871 | 394 | 3,265 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers |
(1,039 | ) | | (1,039 | ) | (993 | ) | | (993 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale |
| (18 | ) | (18 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Deletions |
(2,025 | ) | (242 | ) | (2,267 | ) | (1,897 | ) | (342 | ) | (2,239 | ) | ||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
19,856 | 4,055 | 23,911 | 21,723 | 4,268 | 25,991 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
2,379 | 2,705 | 5,084 | 877 | 2,762 | 3,639 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
| (75 | ) | (75 | ) | | (72 | ) | (72 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Charge for the year |
1,829 | 296 | 2,125 | 3,029 | 304 | 3,333 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment losses |
| | | | 50 | 50 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers |
(21 | ) | | (21 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale |
| (15 | ) | (15 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Deletions |
(1,617 | ) | (230 | ) | (1,847 | ) | (1,527 | ) | (339 | ) | (1,866 | ) | ||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
2,570 | 2,681 | 5,251 | 2,379 | 2,705 | 5,084 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net book amount at 31 December |
17,286 | 1,374 | 18,660 | 19,344 | 1,563 | 20,907 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net book amount at 1 January |
19,344 | 1,563 | 20,907 | 20,865 | 1,174 | 22,039 |
a | For further information see Intangible assets within Note 1 and Note 7. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 135 |
15. Investments in joint ventures
The following table provides aggregated summarized financial information relating to the groups share of joint ventures.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
9,588 | 12,208 | 12,507 | |||||||||||
Profit before interest and taxation |
785 | 1,210 | 1,076 | |||||||||||
Finance costs |
188 | 125 | 130 | |||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
597 | 1,085 | 946 | |||||||||||
Taxation |
625 | 515 | 499 | |||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
(28 | ) | 570 | 447 | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
(1 | ) | (15 | ) | 38 | |||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
(29 | ) | 555 | 485 | ||||||||||
Non-current assets |
11,163 | 11,586 | ||||||||||||
Current assets |
2,515 | 2,853 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
13,678 | 14,439 | ||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
1,855 | 2,222 | ||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
3,500 | 3,774 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
5,355 | 5,996 | ||||||||||||
Net assets |
8,323 | 8,443 | ||||||||||||
Group investment in joint ventures |
||||||||||||||
Group share of net assets (as above) |
8,323 | 8,443 | ||||||||||||
Loans made by group companies to joint ventures |
89 | 310 | ||||||||||||
8,412 | 8,753 |
The loss for the year shown in the table above includes $711 million relating to BPs share of impairment losses recognized by joint ventures, a significant element of which relates to the Angola LNG plant.
Transactions between the group and its joint ventures are summarized below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales to joint ventures | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Product | Sales |
Amount
receivable at 31 December |
Sales |
Amount
receivable at 31 December |
Sales |
Amount
receivable at 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||
LNG, crude oil and oil products, natural gas |
2,841 | 245 | 3,148 | 300 | 4,125 | 342 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases from joint ventures | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Product | Purchases |
Amount
payable at 31 December |
Purchases |
Amount
31 December |
Purchases |
Amount
31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||
LNG, crude oil and oil products, natural gas, refinery operating costs, plant processing fees |
861 | 104 | 907 | 129 | 503 | 51 |
The terms of the outstanding balances receivable from joint ventures are typically 30 to 45 days. The balances are unsecured and will be settled in cash. There are no significant provisions for doubtful debts relating to these balances and no significant expense recognized in the income statement in respect of bad or doubtful debts. Dividends receivable are not included in the table above.
The following table provides aggregated summarized financial information for the groups associates as it relates to the amounts recognized in the group income statement and on the group balance sheet.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income statement | Balance sheet | |||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings from
associates
|
Investments
in associates |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||
Rosneft |
1,330 | 2,101 | 2,058 | 5,797 | 7,312 | |||||||||||||||||
Other associates |
509 | 701 | 684 | 3,625 | 3,091 | |||||||||||||||||
1,839 | 2,802 | 2,742 | 9,422 | 10,403 |
The associate that is material to the group at both 31 December 2015 and 2014 is Rosneft. In 2013, BP sold its 50% interest in TNK-BP to Rosneft and increased its investment in Rosneft. The net cash inflow in 2013 relating to the transaction included in Net cash used in investing activities in the cash flow statement was $11.8 billion. From 22 October 2012, the investment in TNK-BP was classified as an asset held for sale and, therefore, equity accounting ceased. Profits of approximately $738 million were not recognized in 2013 as a result of the discontinuance of equity accounting.
136 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
16. Investments in associates continued
Since 21 March 2013, BP has owned 19.75% of the voting shares of Rosneft. Rosneft shares are listed on the MICEX stock exchange in Moscow and its global depository receipts are listed on the London Stock Exchange. The Russian federal government, through its investment company OJSC Rosneftegaz, owned 69.5% of the voting shares of Rosneft at 31 December 2015.
BP classifies its investment in Rosneft as an associate because, in managements judgement, BP has significant influence over Rosneft; see Note 1 Interests in other entities Significant estimate or judgement: accounting for interests in other entities. The groups investment in Rosneft is a foreign operation whose functional currency is the Russian rouble. The reduction in the groups equity-accounted investment balance for Rosneft at 31 December 2015 compared with 31 December 2014 was principally due to the weakening of the rouble compared to the US dollar, the effects of which have been recognized in other comprehensive income.
The value of BPs 19.75% shareholding in Rosneft based on the quoted market share price of $3.48 per share (2014 $3.51 per share) was $7,283 million at 31 December 2015 (2014 $7,346 million).
The following table provides summarized financial information relating to Rosneft. This information is presented on a 100% basis and reflects adjustments made by BP to Rosnefts own results in applying the equity method of accounting. BP adjusts Rosnefts results for the accounting required under IFRS relating to BPs purchase of its interest in Rosneft and the amortization of the deferred gain relating to the disposal of BPs interest in TNK-BP. These adjustments have increased the reported profit for 2015, as shown in the table below, compared with the equivalent amount in Russian roubles that we expect Rosneft to report in its own financial statements under IFRS.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
Gross amount | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
84,071 | 142,856 | 122,866 | |||||||||||
Profit before interest and taxation |
12,253 | 19,367 | 14,106 | |||||||||||
Finance costs |
3,696 | 5,230 | 1,337 | |||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
8,557 | 14,137 | 12,769 | |||||||||||
Taxation |
1,792 | 3,428 | 2,137 | |||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
30 | 71 | 213 | |||||||||||
Profit for the year |
6,735 | 10,638 | 10,419 | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
(4,111 | ) | (13,038 | ) | (441 | ) | ||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
2,624 | (2,400 | ) | 9,978 | ||||||||||
Non-current assets |
84,689 | 101,073 | ||||||||||||
Current assets |
34,891 | 38,278 | ||||||||||||
Total assets |
119,580 | 139,351 | ||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
25,691 | 36,400 | ||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
63,554 | 65,266 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
89,245 | 101,666 | ||||||||||||
Net assets |
30,335 | 37,685 | ||||||||||||
Less: non-controlling interests |
982 | 663 | ||||||||||||
29,353 | 37,022 |
The group received dividends, net of withholding tax, of $271 million from Rosneft in 2015 (2014 dividends of $693 million and 2013 dividends of $456 million).
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 137 |
16. Investments in associates continued
Summarized financial information for the groups share of associates is shown below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BP share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rosneft a | Other | Total | Rosneft a | Other | Total | Rosneft | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
16,604 | 6,000 | 22,604 | 28,214 | 9,724 | 37,938 | 24,266 | 12,998 | 37,264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit before interest and taxation |
2,420 | 661 | 3,081 | 3,825 | 938 | 4,763 | 2,786 | 908 | 3,694 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance costs |
730 | 6 | 736 | 1,033 | 7 | 1,040 | 264 | 11 | 275 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit before taxation |
1,690 | 655 | 2,345 | 2,792 | 931 | 3,723 | 2,522 | 897 | 3,419 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxation |
354 | 146 | 500 | 677 | 230 | 907 | 422 | 213 | 635 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
6 | | 6 | 14 | | 14 | 42 | | 42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit for the year |
1,330 | 509 | 1,839 | 2,101 | 701 | 2,802 | 2,058 | 684 | 2,742 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
(812 | ) | (2 | ) | (814 | ) | (2,575 | ) | 10 | (2,565 | ) | (87 | ) | 2 | (85 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
518 | 507 | 1,025 | (474 | ) | 711 | 237 | 1,971 | 686 | 2,657 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
16,726 | 3,914 | 20,640 | 19,962 | 2,975 | 22,937 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
6,891 | 1,621 | 8,512 | 7,560 | 2,199 | 9,759 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
23,617 | 5,535 | 29,152 | 27,522 | 5,174 | 32,696 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
5,074 | 1,134 | 6,208 | 7,189 | 1,614 | 8,803 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
12,552 | 1,311 | 13,863 | 12,890 | 921 | 13,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
17,626 | 2,445 | 20,071 | 20,079 | 2,535 | 22,614 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net assets |
5,991 | 3,090 | 9,081 | 7,443 | 2,639 | 10,082 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: non-controlling interests |
194 | | 194 | 131 | | 131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5,797 | 3,090 | 8,887 | 7,312 | 2,639 | 9,951 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Group investment in associates |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Group share of net assets (as above) |
5,797 | 3,090 | 8,887 | 7,312 | 2,639 | 9,951 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans made by group companies to associates |
| 535 | 535 | | 452 | 452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5,797 | 3,625 | 9,422 | 7,312 | 3,091 | 10,403 |
a | From 1 October 2014, Rosneft adopted hedge accounting in relation to a portion of highly probable future export revenue denominated in US dollars over a five-year period. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising on the retranslation of borrowings denominated in currencies other than the Russian rouble and designated as hedging instruments are recognized initially in other comprehensive income, and are reclassified to the income statement as the hedged revenue is recognized. |
Transactions between the group and its associates are summarized below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales to associates | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Product | Sales |
Amount
receivable at 31 December |
Sales |
Amount
receivable at 31 December |
Sales |
Amount
receivable at 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||
LNG, crude oil and oil products, natural gas |
5,302 | 1,058 | 9,589 | 1,258 | 5,170 | 783 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases from associates | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Product | Purchases |
Amount
payable at 31 December |
Purchases |
Amount
payable at 31 December |
Purchases |
Amount
payable at 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil and oil products, natural gas, transportation tariff |
11,619 | 2,026 | 22,703 | 2,307 | 21,205 | 3,470 |
In addition to the transactions shown in the table above, in 2015 the group acquired a 20% participatory interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha, a Rosneft subsidiary.
The terms of the outstanding balances receivable from associates are typically 30 to 45 days. The balances are unsecured and will be settled in cash. There are no significant provisions for doubtful debts relating to these balances and no significant expense recognized in the income statement in respect of bad or doubtful debts. Dividends receivable are not included in the table above.
The majority of the sales to and purchases from associates relate to crude oil and oil products transactions with Rosneft.
BP has commitments amounting to $11,446 million (2014 $6,946 million), primarily in relation to contracts with its associates for the purchase of transportation capacity.
138 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
Current | Non-current | Current | Non-current | |||||||||||||||
Equity investments a |
| 397 | | 420 | ||||||||||||||
Other |
219 | 605 | 329 | 808 | ||||||||||||||
219 | 1,002 | 329 | 1,228 |
a | The majority of equity investments are unlisted. |
Other non-current investments includes $605 million relating to life insurance policies (2014 $599 million) which have been designated as financial assets at fair value through profit and loss and their valuation methodology is in level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
$ million | ||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Crude oil |
3,467 | 5,614 | ||||||||
Natural gas |
251 | 285 | ||||||||
Refined petroleum and petrochemical products |
7,470 | 8,975 | ||||||||
11,188 | 14,874 | |||||||||
Supplies |
2,626 | 3,051 | ||||||||
13,814 | 17,925 | |||||||||
Trading inventories |
328 | 448 | ||||||||
14,142 | 18,373 | |||||||||
Cost of inventories expensed in the income statement |
164,790 | 281,907 |
The inventory valuation at 31 December 2015 is stated net of a provision of $1,295 million (2014 $2,879 million) to write inventories down to their net realizable value. The net credit to the income statement in the year in respect of inventory net realizable value provisions was $1,507 million (2014 $2,625 million charge).
Trading inventories are valued using quoted benchmark bid prices adjusted as appropriate for location and quality differentials. As such they are predominantly categorized within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
19. Trade and other receivables
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
Current | Non-current | Current | Non-current | |||||||||||||||
Financial assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
13,682 | 72 | 19,671 | 166 | ||||||||||||||
Amounts receivable from joint ventures and associates |
1,303 | | 1,558 | | ||||||||||||||
Other receivables |
5,908 | 1,249 | 7,863 | 1,293 | ||||||||||||||
20,893 | 1,321 | 29,092 | 1,459 | |||||||||||||||
Non-financial assets |
||||||||||||||||||
Gulf of Mexico oil spill trust fund reimbursement asset a |
686 | | 1,154 | 2,701 | ||||||||||||||
Other receivables |
744 | 895 | 792 | 627 | ||||||||||||||
1,430 | 895 | 1,946 | 3,328 | |||||||||||||||
22,323 | 2,216 | 31,038 | 4,787 |
a | See Note 2 for further information. |
Trade and other receivables are predominantly non-interest bearing. See Note 28 for further information.
20. Valuation and qualifying accounts
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts
receivable |
Fixed asset
investments |
Accounts
receivable |
Fixed asset
investments |
Accounts
receivable |
Fixed asset
investments |
|||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
331 | 517 | 343 | 168 | 489 | 349 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Charged to costs and expenses |
243 | 195 | 127 | 438 | 82 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Charged to other accounts a |
(23 | ) | (4 | ) | (24 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | 4 | |||||||||||||||
Deductions |
(104 | ) | (273 | ) | (115 | ) | (87 | ) | (224 | ) | (189 | ) | ||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
447 | 435 | 331 | 517 | 343 | 168 |
a | Principally exchange adjustments. |
Valuation and qualifying accounts comprise impairment provisions for accounts receivable and fixed asset investments, and are deducted in the balance sheet from the assets to which they apply.
For information on significant estimates and judgements made in relation to the recoverability of trade receivables see Impairment of loans and receivables within Note 1.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 139 |
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
Current | Non-current | Current | Non-current | |||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
16,838 | | 23,074 | | ||||||||||||||
Amounts payable to joint ventures and associates |
2,130 | | 2,436 | | ||||||||||||||
Other payables |
10,775 | 2,351 | 11,832 | 2,985 | ||||||||||||||
29,743 | 2,351 | 37,342 | 2,985 | |||||||||||||||
Non-financial liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||
Other payables |
2,206 | 559 | 2,776 | 602 | ||||||||||||||
31,949 | 2,910 | 40,118 | 3,587 |
Trade and other payables are predominantly interest free. See Note 28 for further information.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decommissioning | Environmental |
Litigation and claims |
Clean Water Act penalties |
Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2015 |
18,720 | 2,847 | 4,739 | 3,510 | 3,082 | 32,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(356 | ) | (18 | ) | (9 | ) | | (119 | ) | (502 | ) | |||||||||||||||
New or increased provisions |
972 | 5,697 | 6,058 | 661 | 1,506 | 14,894 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Write-back of unused provisions |
| (75 | ) | (24 | ) | | (274 | ) | (373 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Unwinding of discount |
167 | 106 | 62 | 68 | 13 | 416 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Change in discount rate a |
| (149 | ) | (74 | ) | (110 | ) | | (333 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Utilization |
(37 | ) | (392 | ) | (3,494 | ) | | (598 | ) | (4,521 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Reclassified to other payables |
(500 | ) | (459 | ) | (124 | ) | | (204 | ) | (1,287 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Deletions |
(20 | ) | | | | (58 | ) | (78 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
18,946 | 7,557 | 7,134 | 4,129 | 3,348 | 41,114 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Of which current |
703 | 587 | 3,023 | | 841 | 5,154 | ||||||||||||||||||||
non-current |
18,243 | 6,970 | 4,111 | 4,129 | 2,507 | 35,960 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Of which Gulf of Mexico oil spill b |
| 5,919 | 6,459 | 4,129 | | 16,507 |
a | Provisions for the agreements to settle all federal and state claims in relation to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill are discounted using a discount rate equal to a current interest rate that the group could obtain for a borrowing on similar terms. |
b | Further information on the financial impacts of the Gulf of Mexico oil spill is provided in Note 2. |
The decommissioning provision comprises the future cost of decommissioning oil and natural gas wells, facilities and related pipelines. The environmental provision includes provisions for costs related to the control, abatement, clean-up or elimination of environmental pollution relating to soil, groundwater, surface water and sediment contamination. The litigation and claims category includes provisions for matters related to, for example, commercial disputes, product liability, and allegations of exposures of third parties to toxic substances. Included within the other category at 31 December 2015 are provisions for deferred employee compensation of $484 million (2014 $553 million).
For information on significant estimates and judgements made in relation to provisions, including those for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, see Provisions, contingencies and reimbursement assets within Note 1.
23. Pensions and other post-retirement benefits
Most group companies have pension plans, the forms and benefits of which vary with conditions and practices in the countries concerned. Pension benefits may be provided through defined contribution plans (money purchase schemes) or defined benefit plans (final salary and other types of schemes with committed pension benefit payments). For defined contribution plans, retirement benefits are determined by the value of funds arising from contributions paid in respect of each employee. For defined benefit plans, retirement benefits are based on such factors as an employees pensionable salary and length of service. Defined benefit plans may be funded or unfunded. The assets of funded plans are generally held in separately administered trusts.
For information on significant estimates and judgements made in relation to accounting for these plans see Pensions and other post-retirement benefits within Note 1.
The primary pension arrangement in the UK is a funded final salary pension plan under which retired employees draw the majority of their benefit as an annuity. This pension plan is governed by a corporate trustee whose board is composed of four member-nominated directors, four company-nominated directors, including an independent director and an independent chairman nominated by the company. The trustee board is required by law to act in the best interests of the plan participants and is responsible for setting certain policies, such as investment policies of the plan. The UK plan is closed to new joiners but remains open to ongoing accrual for current members. New joiners in the UK are eligible for membership of a defined contribution plan.
In the US, all employees who previously accrued pension benefits under a final salary plan now accrue benefits from 2015 onwards under a cash balance formula instead. Benefits previously accrued under final salary formulas are legally protected. Retired US employees typically take their pension benefit in the form of a lump sum payment upon retirement. The plan is funded and its assets are overseen by a fiduciary investment committee composed of six BP employees appointed by the president of BP Corporation North America Inc. (the appointing officer). The investment committee is required by law to act in the best interests of the plan participants and is responsible for setting certain policies, such as the investment policies of the plan. US employees are also eligible to participate in a defined contribution (401k) plan in which employee contributions are matched with company contributions. In the US, group companies also provide post-retirement healthcare to retired employees and their dependants (and, in certain cases, life insurance coverage); the entitlement to these benefits is usually based on the employee remaining in service until a specified age and completion of a minimum period of service.
140 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
23. Pensions and other post-retirement benefits continued
In the Eurozone, there are defined benefit pension plans in Germany, France, the Netherlands and other countries. In Germany and France, the majority of the pensions are unfunded, in line with market practice. In Germany, the groups largest Eurozone plan, employees receive a pension and also have a choice to supplement their core pension through salary sacrifice. For employees who joined since 2002 the core pension benefit is a career average plan with retirement benefits based on such factors as an employees pensionable salary and length of service. The returns on the notional contributions made by both the company and employees are set out in German tax law. Retired German employees take their pension benefit typically in the form of an annuity. The German plan is governed by legal agreements between BP and the works council or between BP and the trade union.
The level of contributions to funded defined benefit plans is the amount needed to provide adequate funds to meet pension obligations as they fall due. During 2015 the aggregate level of contributions was $1,066 million (2014 $1,252 million and 2013 $1,272 million). The aggregate level of contributions in 2016 is expected to be approximately $1,050 million, and includes contributions in all countries that we expect to be required to make contributions by law or under contractual agreements, as well as an allowance for discretionary funding.
For the primary UK plan there is a funding agreement between the group and the trustee. On an annual basis the latest funding position is reviewed and a schedule of contributions covering the next seven years is agreed. The funding agreement can be terminated unilaterally by either party with two years notice. Contractually committed funding therefore represents nine years of future contributions, which amounted to $4,374 million at 31 December 2015, of which $1,437 million relates to past service. This amount is included in the groups committed cash flows relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefit plans as set out in the table of contractual obligations on page 220. The surplus relating to the primary UK pension plan is recognized on the balance sheet on the basis that the company is entitled to a refund of any remaining assets once all members have left the plan.
Pension contributions in the US are determined by legislation and are supplemented by discretionary contributions. All of the contributions made into the US pension plan in 2015 were discretionary and no statutory funding requirement is expected in the next 12 months.
There was no minimum funding requirement for the US plan, and no significant minimum funding requirements in other countries at 31 December 2015.
The obligation and cost of providing pensions and other post-retirement benefits is assessed annually using the projected unit credit method. The date of the most recent actuarial review was 31 December 2015. The UK plans are subject to a formal actuarial valuation every three years; valuations are required more frequently in many other countries. The most recent formal actuarial valuation of the UK pension plans was as at 31 December 2014. A valuation of the US plan is carried out annually.
The material financial assumptions used to estimate the benefit obligations of the various plans are set out below. The assumptions are reviewed by management at the end of each year, and are used to evaluate the accrued benefit obligation at 31 December and pension expense for the following year.
% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assumptions used to determine benefit obligation | 2015 | 2014 |
UK 2013 |
2015 | 2014 |
US 2013 |
2015 | 2014 |
Eurozone
2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate for plan liabilities |
3.9 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 3.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate of increase in salaries |
4.4 | 4.5 | 5.1 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate of increase for pensions in payment |
3.0 | 3.0 | 3.3 | | | | 1.6 | 1.8 | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rate of increase in deferred pensions |
3.0 | 3.0 | 3.3 | | | | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inflation for plan liabilities |
3.0 | 3.0 | 3.3 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assumptions used to determine benefit expense | 2015 | 2014 |
UK 2013 |
2015 | 2014 |
US 2013 |
2015 | 2014 |
Eurozone
2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate for plan service cost |
3.9 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 3.3 | 2.3 | 3.9 | 3.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate for plan other finance expense |
3.6 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.3 | 2.0 | 3.6 | 3.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inflation for plan service cost |
3.1 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 1.6 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
The discount rate assumptions are based on third-party AA corporate bond indices and for our largest plans in the UK, US and the Eurozone we use yields that reflect the maturity profile of the expected benefit payments. The inflation rate assumptions for our UK and US plans are based on the difference between the yields on index-linked and fixed-interest long-term government bonds. In other countries, including the Eurozone, we use one of these approaches, or advice from the local actuary depending on the information available. The inflation assumptions are used to determine the rate of increase for pensions in payment and the rate of increase in deferred pensions where there is such an increase.
The assumptions for the rate of increase in salaries are based on the inflation assumption plus an allowance for expected long-term real salary growth. These include allowance for promotion-related salary growth, of up to 1.0% depending on country.
In addition to the financial assumptions, we regularly review the demographic and mortality assumptions. The mortality assumptions reflect best practice in the countries in which we provide pensions, and have been chosen with regard to the latest available published tables adjusted where appropriate to reflect the experience of the group and an extrapolation of past longevity improvements into the future. BPs most substantial pension liabilities are in the UK, the US and the Eurozone where our mortality assumptions are as follows:
Years | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortality assumptions | 2015 | 2014 |
UK 2013 |
2015 | 2014 |
US 2013 |
2015 | 2014 |
Eurozone
2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life expectancy at age 60 for a male currently aged 60 |
28.5 | 28.3 | 27.8 | 25.7 | 25.6 | 24.9 | 24.9 | 24.7 | 24.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life expectancy at age 60 for a male currently aged 40 |
31.0 | 30.9 | 30.7 | 27.5 | 27.4 | 26.4 | 27.5 | 27.3 | 26.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life expectancy at age 60 for a female currently aged 60 |
29.5 | 29.4 | 29.5 | 29.2 | 29.1 | 26.5 | 28.8 | 28.7 | 28.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Life expectancy at age 60 for a female currently aged 40 |
31.9 | 31.8 | 32.2 | 30.9 | 30.9 | 27.3 | 31.2 | 31.1 | 30.7 |
Pension plan assets are generally held in trusts. The primary objective of the trusts is to accumulate pools of assets sufficient to meet the obligations of the various plans. The assets of the trusts are invested in a manner consistent with fiduciary obligations and principles that reflect current practices in portfolio management.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 141 |
23. Pensions and other post-retirement benefits continued
A significant proportion of the assets are held in equities, which are expected to generate a higher level of return over the long term, with an acceptable level of risk. In order to provide reasonable assurance that no single security or type of security has an unwarranted impact on the total portfolio, the investment portfolios are highly diversified.
For the primary UK pension plan there is an agreement with the trustee to reduce the proportion of plan assets held as equities and increase the proportion held as bonds over time, with a view to better matching the asset portfolio with the pension liabilities. There is a similar agreement in place in the US. During 2015, the UK and the US plans switched 8% and 5% respectively from equities to bonds.
In 2015, BPs primary plan in the UK adopted a more formal liability driven investment (LDI) approach for part of the portfolio, a form of investing designed to match the movement in pension plan assets with the impact of interest rate changes and inflation assumption changes on the projected benefit obligation.
The current asset allocation policy for the major plans at 31 December 2015 was as follows:
UK | US | |||||||||
Asset category | % | % | ||||||||
Total equity (including private equity) |
62 | 55 | ||||||||
Bonds/cash (including LDI) |
31 | 45 | ||||||||
Property/real estate |
7 | |
The amounts invested under the LDI programme as at 31 December 2015 were $329 million of government-issued nominal bonds and $6,421 million of index-linked bonds. This is partly funded by short-term sale and repurchase agreements, proceeds from which are shown separately in the table below.
In addition, the primary UK plan entered into interest rate swaps in the year to offset the long-term fixed interest rate exposure for $2,651 million of the corporate bond portfolio. The $17 million fair value of the swaps as at 31 December 2015 is included in other assets in the table below.
Some of the groups pension plans in other countries also use derivative financial instruments as part of their asset mix to manage the level of risk.
The groups main pension plans do not invest directly in either securities or property/real estate of the company or of any subsidiary.
The fair values of the various categories of assets held by the defined benefit plans at 31 December are presented in the table below, including the effects of derivative financial instruments. Movements in the fair value of plan assets during the year are shown in detail in the table on page 143.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
UK a | US b | Eurozone | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of pension plan assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Listed equities developed markets |
13,474 | 2,329 | 423 | 371 | 16,597 | |||||||||||||||||
emerging markets |
2,305 | 226 | 49 | 50 | 2,630 | |||||||||||||||||
Private equity |
2,933 | 1,522 | 1 | 4 | 4,460 | |||||||||||||||||
Government issued nominal bonds |
393 | 1,527 | 685 | 492 | 3,097 | |||||||||||||||||
Government issued index-linked bonds |
6,425 | | 5 | | 6,430 | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
4,357 | 1,717 | 551 | 367 | 6,992 | |||||||||||||||||
Property |
2,453 | 6 | 48 | 58 | 2,565 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash |
564 | 116 | 10 | 139 | 829 | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
110 | 67 | 102 | 50 | 329 | |||||||||||||||||
Debt (repurchase agreements) used to fund liability driven investments |
(1,791 | ) | | | | (1,791 | ) | |||||||||||||||
31,223 | 7,510 | 1,874 | 1,531 | 42,138 | ||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Listed equities developed markets |
16,190 | 3,026 | 415 | 420 | 20,051 | |||||||||||||||||
emerging markets |
2,719 | 293 | 45 | 47 | 3,104 | |||||||||||||||||
Private equity |
2,983 | 1,571 | 2 | 26 | 4,582 | |||||||||||||||||
Government issued nominal bonds |
642 | 1,535 | 753 | 604 | 3,534 | |||||||||||||||||
Government issued index-linked bonds |
892 | | 9 | | 901 | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
4,687 | 1,726 | 541 | 340 | 7,294 | |||||||||||||||||
Property |
2,403 | 7 | 51 | 69 | 2,530 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash |
1,145 | 134 | 85 | 191 | 1,555 | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
112 | 63 | 72 | 38 | 285 | |||||||||||||||||
31,773 | 8,355 | 1,973 | 1,735 | 43,836 | ||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Listed equities developed markets |
17,341 | 3,260 | 414 | 499 | 21,514 | |||||||||||||||||
emerging markets |
2,290 | 308 | 32 | 52 | 2,682 | |||||||||||||||||
Private equity |
2,907 | 1,432 | 2 | 4 | 4,345 | |||||||||||||||||
Government issued nominal bonds |
549 | 1,259 | 717 | 541 | 3,066 | |||||||||||||||||
Government issued index-linked bonds |
787 | | 12 | 57 | 856 | |||||||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
4,427 | 1,323 | 597 | 385 | 6,732 | |||||||||||||||||
Property |
2,200 | 6 | 57 | 77 | 2,340 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash |
855 | 135 | 120 | 158 | 1,268 | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
160 | 55 | 64 | 49 | 328 | |||||||||||||||||
31,516 | 7,778 | 2,015 | 1,822 | 43,131 |
a | Bonds held by the UK pension plans are all denominated in sterling. Property held by the UK pension plans is in the United Kingdom. |
b | Bonds held by the US pension plans are denominated in US dollars. |
142 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
23. Pensions and other post-retirement benefits continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
UK | US | Eurozone | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Analysis of the amount charged to profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current service cost a |
485 | 371 | 96 | 96 | 1,048 | |||||||||||||||||
Past service cost b |
12 | (27 | ) | 47 | (7 | ) | 25 | |||||||||||||||
Settlement |
| | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Operating charge relating to defined benefit plans |
497 | 344 | 142 | 86 | 1,069 | |||||||||||||||||
Payments to defined contribution plans |
31 | 205 | 8 | 41 | 285 | |||||||||||||||||
Total operating charge |
528 | 549 | 150 | 127 | 1,354 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income on plan assets a |
(1,124 | ) | (289 | ) | (37 | ) | (55 | ) | (1,505 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest on plan liabilities |
1,146 | 423 | 151 | 91 | 1,811 | |||||||||||||||||
Other finance expense |
22 | 134 | 114 | 36 | 306 | |||||||||||||||||
Analysis of the amount recognized in other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual asset return less interest income on plan assets |
315 | (139 | ) | 25 | 33 | 234 | ||||||||||||||||
Change in financial assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities |
2,054 | 607 | 592 | 213 | 3,466 | |||||||||||||||||
Change in demographic assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities |
| 60 | 15 | | 75 | |||||||||||||||||
Experience gains and losses arising on the plan liabilities |
336 | (48 | ) | 47 | 29 | 364 | ||||||||||||||||
Remeasurements recognized in other comprehensive income |
2,705 | 480 | 679 | 275 | 4,139 | |||||||||||||||||
Movements in benefit obligation during the year |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at 1 January |
32,416 | 11,875 | 8,327 | 2,638 | 55,256 | |||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(1,451 | ) | | (843 | ) | (294 | ) | (2,588 | ) | |||||||||||||
Operating charge relating to defined benefit plans |
497 | 344 | 142 | 86 | 1,069 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
1,146 | 423 | 151 | 91 | 1,811 | |||||||||||||||||
Contributions by plan participants c |
32 | | 2 | 5 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||
Benefit payments (funded plans) d |
(1,269 | ) | (1,124 | ) | (81 | ) | (178 | ) | (2,652 | ) | ||||||||||||
Benefit payments (unfunded plans) d |
(7 | ) | (256 | ) | (306 | ) | (26 | ) | (595 | ) | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | 9 | 9 | |||||||||||||||||
Reclassified as assets held for sale |
| | (98 | ) | | (98 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Remeasurements |
(2,390 | ) | (619 | ) | (654 | ) | (242 | ) | (3,905 | ) | ||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at 31 December a e |
28,974 | 10,643 | 6,640 | 2,089 | 48,346 | |||||||||||||||||
Movements in fair value of plan assets during the year |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at 1 January |
31,773 | 8,355 | 1,973 | 1,735 | 43,836 | |||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(1,506 | ) | | (205 | ) | (186 | ) | (1,897 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest income on plan assets a |
1,124 | 289 | 37 | 55 | 1,505 | |||||||||||||||||
Contributions by plan participants c |
32 | | 2 | 5 | 39 | |||||||||||||||||
Contributions by employers (funded plans) |
754 | 129 | 123 | 60 | 1,066 | |||||||||||||||||
Benefit payments (funded plans) d |
(1,269 | ) | (1,124 | ) | (81 | ) | (178 | ) | (2,652 | ) | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| | | 7 | 7 | |||||||||||||||||
Remeasurements f |
315 | (139 | ) | 25 | 33 | 234 | ||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at 31 December g |
31,223 | 7,510 | 1,874 | 1,531 | 42,138 | |||||||||||||||||
Surplus (deficit) at 31 December |
2,249 | (3,133 | ) | (4,766 | ) | (558 | ) | (6,208 | ) | |||||||||||||
Represented by |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset recognized |
2,516 | 66 | 25 | 40 | 2,647 | |||||||||||||||||
Liability recognized |
(267 | ) | (3,199 | ) | (4,791 | ) | (598 | ) | (8,855 | ) | ||||||||||||
2,249 | (3,133 | ) | (4,766 | ) | (558 | ) | (6,208 | ) | ||||||||||||||
The surplus (deficit) may be analysed between funded and unfunded plans as follows |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Funded |
2,506 | 49 | (254 | ) | (187 | ) | 2,114 | |||||||||||||||
Unfunded |
(257 | ) | (3,182 | ) | (4,512 | ) | (371 | ) | (8,322 | ) | ||||||||||||
2,249 | (3,133 | ) | (4,766 | ) | (558 | ) | (6,208 | ) | ||||||||||||||
The defined benefit obligation may be analysed between funded and unfunded plans as follows |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Funded |
(28,717 | ) | (7,461 | ) | (2,128 | ) | (1,718 | ) | (40,024 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unfunded |
(257 | ) | (3,182 | ) | (4,512 | ) | (371 | ) | (8,322 | ) | ||||||||||||
(28,974 | ) | (10,643 | ) | (6,640 | ) | (2,089 | ) | (48,346 | ) |
a | The costs of managing plan investments are offset against the investment return, the costs of administering pension plan benefits are generally included in current service cost and the costs of administering other post-retirement benefit plans are included in the benefit obligation. |
b | Past service costs have arisen from restructuring programmes and represent a combination of credits as a result of the curtailment in the pension arrangements of a number of employees mostly in the US and Trinidad and charges for special termination benefits representing the increased liability arising as a result of early retirements mostly in the UK and Eurozone. |
c | Most of the contributions made by plan participants into UK pension plans were made under salary sacrifice. |
d | The benefit payments amount shown above comprises $3,128 million benefits and $57 million settlements, plus $62 million of plan expenses incurred in the administration of the benefit. |
e | The benefit obligation for the US is made up of $8,061 million for pension liabilities and $2,582 million for other post-retirement benefit liabilities (which are unfunded and are primarily retiree medical liabilities). The benefit obligation for the Eurozone includes $4,151 million for pension liabilities in Germany which is largely unfunded. |
f | The actual return on plan assets is made up of the sum of the interest income on plan assets and the remeasurement of plan assets as disclosed above. |
g | The fair value of plan assets includes borrowings related to the LDI programme as described on page 142. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 143 |
23. Pensions and other post-retirement benefits continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
UK | US | Eurozone | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Analysis of the amount charged to profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current service cost a |
494 | 356 | 72 | 87 | 1,009 | |||||||||||||||||
Past service cost b |
| (33 | ) | 20 | 1 | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Settlement c |
| (66 | ) | | | (66 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating charge relating to defined benefit plans |
494 | 257 | 92 | 88 | 931 | |||||||||||||||||
Payments to defined contribution plans |
30 | 214 | 11 | 54 | 309 | |||||||||||||||||
Total operating charge |
524 | 471 | 103 | 142 | 1,240 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income on plan assets a |
(1,425 | ) | (317 | ) | (70 | ) | (80 | ) | (1,892 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest on plan liabilities |
1,378 | 458 | 255 | 115 | 2,206 | |||||||||||||||||
Other finance expense |
(47 | ) | 141 | 185 | 35 | 314 | ||||||||||||||||
Analysis of the amount recognized in other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual asset return less interest income on plan assets |
1,269 | 768 | 119 | 31 | 2,187 | |||||||||||||||||
Change in financial assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities |
(3,188 | ) | (1,004 | ) | (1,845 | ) | (350 | ) | (6,387 | ) | ||||||||||||
Change in demographic assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities |
42 | (264 | ) | (20 | ) | (9 | ) | (251 | ) | |||||||||||||
Experience gains and losses arising on the plan liabilities |
(41 | ) | 13 | (86 | ) | (25 | ) | (139 | ) | |||||||||||||
Remeasurements recognized in other comprehensive income |
(1,918 | ) | (487 | ) | (1,832 | ) | (353 | ) | (4,590 | ) | ||||||||||||
Movements in benefit obligation during the year |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at 1 January |
30,552 | 11,002 | 7,536 | 2,443 | 51,533 | |||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(1,993 | ) | | (1,040 | ) | (256 | ) | (3,289 | ) | |||||||||||||
Operating charge relating to defined benefit plans |
494 | 257 | 92 | 88 | 931 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
1,378 | 458 | 255 | 115 | 2,206 | |||||||||||||||||
Contributions by plan participants d |
39 | | 4 | 7 | 50 | |||||||||||||||||
Benefit payments (funded plans) e |
(1,231 | ) | (865 | ) | (83 | ) | (119 | ) | (2,298 | ) | ||||||||||||
Benefit payments (unfunded plans) e |
(10 | ) | (238 | ) | (370 | ) | (24 | ) | (642 | ) | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| 6 | | | 6 | |||||||||||||||||
Disposals |
| | (18 | ) | | (18 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Remeasurements |
3,187 | 1,255 | 1,951 | 384 | 6,777 | |||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at 31 December a f |
32,416 | 11,875 | 8,327 | 2,638 | 55,256 | |||||||||||||||||
Movements in fair value of plan assets during the year |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at 1 January |
31,516 | 7,778 | 2,015 | 1,822 | 43,131 | |||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
(1,958 | ) | | (257 | ) | (161 | ) | (2,376 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest income on plan assets a g |
1,425 | 317 | 70 | 80 | 1,892 | |||||||||||||||||
Contributions by plan participants d |
39 | | 4 | 7 | 50 | |||||||||||||||||
Contributions by employers (funded plans) |
713 | 354 | 110 | 75 | 1,252 | |||||||||||||||||
Benefit payments (funded plans) e |
(1,231 | ) | (865 | ) | (83 | ) | (119 | ) | (2,298 | ) | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions |
| 3 | | | 3 | |||||||||||||||||
Disposals |
| | (5 | ) | | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Remeasurements g |
1,269 | 768 | 119 | 31 | 2,187 | |||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at 31 December |
31,773 | 8,355 | 1,973 | 1,735 | 43,836 | |||||||||||||||||
Surplus (deficit) at 31 December |
(643 | ) | (3,520 | ) | (6,354 | ) | (903 | ) | (11,420 | ) | ||||||||||||
Represented by |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset recognized |
15 | | 3 | 13 | 31 | |||||||||||||||||
Liability recognized |
(658 | ) | (3,520 | ) | (6,357 | ) | (916 | ) | (11,451 | ) | ||||||||||||
(643 | ) | (3,520 | ) | (6,354 | ) | (903 | ) | (11,420 | ) | |||||||||||||
The surplus (deficit) may be analysed between funded and unfunded plans as follows |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Funded |
(310 | ) | (19 | ) | (663 | ) | (384 | ) | (1,376 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unfunded |
(333 | ) | (3,501 | ) | (5,691 | ) | (519 | ) | (10,044 | ) | ||||||||||||
(643 | ) | (3,520 | ) | (6,354 | ) | (903 | ) | (11,420 | ) | |||||||||||||
The defined benefit obligation may be analysed between funded and unfunded plans as follows |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Funded |
(32,083 | ) | (8,374 | ) | (2,636 | ) | (2,119 | ) | (45,212 | ) | ||||||||||||
Unfunded |
(333 | ) | (3,501 | ) | (5,691 | ) | (519 | ) | (10,044 | ) | ||||||||||||
(32,416 | ) | (11,875 | ) | (8,327 | ) | (2,638 | ) | (55,256 | ) |
a | The costs of managing plan investments are offset against the investment return, the costs of administering pension plan benefits are generally included in current service cost and the costs of administering other post-retirement benefit plans are included in the benefit obligation. |
b | Past service costs in the US include a credit of $21 million as the result of a curtailment in the pension arrangement of a number of employees following a business reorganization and a credit of $12 million reflecting a plan amendment to a medical plan. A charge of $21 million for special termination benefits represents the increased liability arising as a result of early retirements occurring as part of restructuring programmes mostly in the Eurozone. |
c | Settlements represent a gain of $66 million arising from an offer to a group of plan members in the US to settle annuity liabilities with lump sum payments. |
d | Most of the contributions made by plan participants into UK pension plans were made under salary sacrifice. |
e | The benefit payments amount shown above comprises $2,621 million benefits and $257 million settlements, plus $62 million of plan expenses incurred in the administration of the benefit. |
f | The benefit obligation for the US is made up of $9,033 million for pension liabilities and $2,842 million for other post-retirement benefit liabilities (which are unfunded and are primarily retiree medical liabilities). The benefit obligation for the Eurozone includes $5,220 million for pension liabilities in Germany which is largely unfunded. |
g | The actual return on plan assets is made up of the sum of the interest income on plan assets and the remeasurement of plan assets as disclosed above. |
144 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
23. Pensions and other post-retirement benefits continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
UK | US | Eurozone | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Analysis of the amount charged to profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Current service cost a |
497 | 407 | 81 | 96 | 1,081 | |||||||||||||||||
Past service cost |
(22 | ) | (49 | ) | 26 | 1 | (44 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Settlement |
| | | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Operating charge relating to defined benefit plans |
475 | 358 | 107 | 96 | 1,036 | |||||||||||||||||
Payments to defined contribution plans |
24 | 223 | 9 | 44 | 300 | |||||||||||||||||
Total operating charge |
499 | 581 | 116 | 140 | 1,336 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest income on plan assets a |
(1,139 | ) | (240 | ) | (63 | ) | (67 | ) | (1,509 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest on plan liabilities |
1,223 | 406 | 254 | 106 | 1,989 | |||||||||||||||||
Other finance expense |
84 | 166 | 191 | 39 | 480 | |||||||||||||||||
Analysis of the amount recognized in other comprehensive income |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual asset return less interest income on plan assets |
2,671 | 730 | 15 | 99 | 3,515 | |||||||||||||||||
Change in financial assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities |
68 | 1,160 | 62 | 213 | 1,503 | |||||||||||||||||
Change in demographic assumptions underlying the present value of the plan liabilities |
| 14 | | (65 | ) | (51 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Experience gains and losses arising on the plan liabilities |
43 | (249 | ) | 2 | 1 | (203 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Remeasurements recognized in other comprehensive income |
2,782 | 1,655 | 79 | 248 | 4,764 |
a | The costs of managing plan investments are offset against the investment return, the costs of administering pension plan benefits are generally included in current service cost and the costs of administering other post-retirement benefit plans are included in the benefit obligation. |
At 31 December 2015, reimbursement balances due from or to other companies in respect of pensions amounted to $377 million reimbursement assets (2014 $426 million) and $13 million reimbursement liabilities (2014 $16 million). These balances are not included as part of the pension surpluses and deficits, but are reflected within other receivables and other payables in the group balance sheet.
Sensitivity analysis
The discount rate, inflation, salary growth and the mortality assumptions all have a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one-percentage point change, in isolation, in certain assumptions as at 31 December 2015 for the groups plans would have had the effects shown in the table below. The effects shown for the expense in 2016 comprise the total of current service cost and net finance income or expense.
$ million | ||||||||||
One percentage point | ||||||||||
Increase | Decrease | |||||||||
Discount rate a |
||||||||||
Effect on pension and other post-retirement benefit expense in 2016 |
(416 | ) | 387 | |||||||
Effect on pension and other post-retirement benefit obligation at 31 December 2015 |
(6,897 | ) | 8,911 | |||||||
Inflation rate b |
||||||||||
Effect on pension and other post-retirement benefit expense in 2016 |
408 | (312 | ) | |||||||
Effect on pension and other post-retirement benefit obligation at 31 December 2015 |
6,996 | (5,523 | ) | |||||||
Salary growth |
||||||||||
Effect on pension and other post-retirement benefit expense in 2016 |
112 | (99 | ) | |||||||
Effect on pension and other post-retirement benefit obligation at 31 December 2015 |
1,135 | (1,004 | ) |
a | The amounts presented reflect that the discount rate is used to determine the asset interest income as well as the interest cost on the obligation. |
b | The amounts presented reflect the total impact of an inflation rate change on the assumptions for rate of increase in salaries, pensions in payment and deferred pensions. |
One additional year of longevity in the mortality assumptions would increase the 2016 pension and other post-retirement benefit expense by $60 million and the pension and other post-retirement benefit obligation at 31 December 2015 by $1,329 million.
Estimated future benefit payments and the weighted average duration of defined benefit obligations
The expected benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, but exclude plan expenses, up until 2025 and the weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligations at 31 December 2015 are as follows:
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated future benefit payments | UK | US | Eurozone | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||
2016 |
1,061 | 966 | 363 | 120 | 2,510 | |||||||||||||||||
2017 |
1,098 | 838 | 345 | 117 | 2,398 | |||||||||||||||||
2018 |
1,150 | 846 | 337 | 121 | 2,454 | |||||||||||||||||
2019 |
1,188 | 839 | 327 | 125 | 2,479 | |||||||||||||||||
2020 |
1,210 | 834 | 319 | 127 | 2,490 | |||||||||||||||||
2021-2025 |
6,575 | 3,966 | 1,517 | 667 | 12,725 | |||||||||||||||||
years | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average duration |
18.2 | 9.4 | 14.0 | 14.0 |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 145 |
$ million | ||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Cash |
4,653 | 5,112 | ||||||||
Term bank deposits |
16,749 | 18,392 | ||||||||
Cash equivalents |
4,987 | 6,259 | ||||||||
26,389 | 29,763 |
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in hand; current balances with banks and similar institutions; term deposits of three months or less with banks and similar institutions; money market funds and commercial paper. The carrying amounts of cash and term bank deposits approximate their fair values. Substantially all of the other cash equivalents are categorized within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 2015 includes $2,439 million (2014 $2,264 million) that is restricted. The restricted cash balances include amounts required to cover initial margin on trading exchanges and certain cash balances which are subject to exchange controls.
The group holds $4,329 million (2014 $3,852 million) of cash and cash equivalents outside the UK and it is not expected that any significant tax will arise on repatriation.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current | Non-current | Total | Current | Non-current | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings |
6,898 | 45,567 | 52,465 | 6,831 | 45,240 | 52,071 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net obligations under finance leases |
46 | 657 | 703 | 46 | 737 | 783 | ||||||||||||||||||||
6,944 | 46,224 | 53,168 | 6,877 | 45,977 | 52,854 |
The main elements of current borrowings are the current portion of long-term borrowings that is due to be repaid in the next 12 months of $5,942 million (2014 $6,343 million) and issued commercial paper of $869 million (2014 $444 million). Finance debt does not include accrued interest, which is reported within other payables.
At 31 December 2015, $122 million (2014 $137 million) of finance debt was secured by the pledging of assets. The remainder of finance debt was unsecured.
The following table shows the weighted average interest rates achieved through a combination of borrowings and derivative financial instruments entered into to manage interest rate and currency exposures.
Fixed rate debt | Floating rate debt | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted
% |
Weighted
average time for which rate is fixed Years |
Amount $ million |
Weighted
% |
Amount $ million |
Amount $ million |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US dollar |
3 | 4 | 10,442 | 1 | 40,623 | 51,065 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other currencies |
6 | 17 | 826 | 1 | 1,277 | 2,103 | ||||||||||||||||||||
11,268 | 41,900 | 53,168 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
US dollar |
3 | 3 | 14,285 | 1 | 36,275 | 50,560 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other currencies |
6 | 19 | 871 | 1 | 1,423 | 2,294 | ||||||||||||||||||||
15,156 | 37,698 | 52,854 |
The floating rate debt denominated in other currencies represents euro debt not swapped to US dollars, which is naturally hedged with respect to foreign currency risk by holding equivalent euro cash and cash equivalent amounts.
Fair values
The estimated fair value of finance debt is shown in the table below together with the carrying amount as reflected in the balance sheet.
Long-term borrowings in the table below include the portion of debt that matures in the 12 months from 31 December 2015, whereas in the balance sheet the amount is reported within current finance debt.
The carrying amount of the groups short-term borrowings, comprising mainly commercial paper, approximates their fair value. The fair values of the majority of the groups long-term borrowings are determined using quoted prices in active markets, and so fall within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Where quoted prices are not available, quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets are used and such measurements are therefore categorized in level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the groups finance lease obligations is estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the groups current incremental borrowing rates for similar types and maturities of borrowing and are consequently categorized in level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
Fair value |
Carrying
amount |
Fair value |
Carrying
amount |
|||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings |
956 | 956 | 487 | 487 | ||||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
51,404 | 51,509 | 51,995 | 51,584 | ||||||||||||||
Net obligations under finance leases |
1,178 | 703 | 1,343 | 783 | ||||||||||||||
Total finance debt |
53,538 | 53,168 | 53,825 | 52,854 |
146 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
26. Capital disclosures and analysis of changes in net debt
The group defines capital as total equity. We maintain our financial framework to support the pursuit of value growth for shareholders, while ensuring a secure financial base.
The group monitors capital on the basis of the net debt ratio, that is, the ratio of net debt to net debt plus equity. Net debt is calculated as gross finance debt, as shown in the balance sheet, plus the fair value of associated derivative financial instruments that are used to hedge foreign exchange and interest rate risks relating to finance debt, for which hedge accounting is applied, less cash and cash equivalents. Net debt and net debt ratio are non-GAAP measures. BP believes these measures provide useful information to investors. Net debt enables investors to see the economic effect of gross debt, related hedges and cash and cash equivalents in total. The net debt ratio enables investors to see how significant net debt is relative to equity from shareholders. The derivatives are reported on the balance sheet within the headings Derivative financial instruments. All components of equity are included in the denominator of the calculation.
We aim to maintain the net debt ratio, with some flexibility, at around 20%. We expect the net debt ratio to be above 20% while oil prices remain weak. At 31 December 2015, the net debt ratio was 21.6% (2014 16.7%).
$ million | ||||||||||
At 31 December | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Gross debt |
53,168 | 52,854 | ||||||||
Less: fair value asset (liability) of hedges related to finance debt a |
(379 | ) | 445 | |||||||
53,547 | 52,409 | |||||||||
Less: cash and cash equivalents |
26,389 | 29,763 | ||||||||
Net debt |
27,158 | 22,646 | ||||||||
Equity |
98,387 | 112,642 | ||||||||
Net debt ratio |
21.6% | 16.7% |
a | Derivative financial instruments entered into for the purpose of managing interest rate and foreign currency exchange risk associated with net debt with a fair value liability position of $1,617 million (2014 liability of $774 million) are not included in the calculation of net debt shown above as hedge accounting was not applied for these instruments. |
An analysis of changes in net debt is provided below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Movement in net debt |
Finance debt a |
Cash and
cash equivalents |
Net debt |
Finance
debt a |
Cash and
cash equivalents |
Net debt | ||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
(52,409 | ) | 29,763 | (22,646 | ) | (47,715 | ) | 22,520 | (25,195 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Exchange adjustments |
1,065 | (672 | ) | 393 | 1,160 | (671 | ) | 489 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net cash flow |
(2,220 | ) | (2,702 | ) | (4,922 | ) | (5,419 | ) | 7,914 | 2,495 | ||||||||||||||||
Other movements |
17 | | 17 | (435 | ) | | (435 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
(53,547 | ) | 26,389 | (27,158 | ) | (52,409 | ) | 29,763 | (22,646 | ) |
a | Including the fair value of associated derivative financial instruments for which hedge accounting is applied. |
The cost recognized in relation to minimum lease payments for the year was $6,008 million (2014 $6,324 million and 2013 $5,961 million).
The future minimum lease payments at 31 December 2015, before deducting related rental income from operating sub-leases of $166 million (2014 $234 million), are shown in the table below. This does not include future contingent rentals. Where the lease rentals are dependent on a variable factor, the future minimum lease payments are based on the factor as at inception of the lease.
$ million | ||||||||||
Future minimum lease payments | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Payable within |
||||||||||
1 year |
4,144 | 5,401 | ||||||||
2 to 5 years |
7,743 | 9,916 | ||||||||
Thereafter |
3,535 | 3,468 | ||||||||
15,422 | 18,785 |
In the case of an operating lease entered into by BP as the operator of a joint operation, the amounts included in the totals disclosed represent the net operating lease expense and net future minimum lease payments. These net amounts are after deducting amounts reimbursed, or to be reimbursed, by joint operators, whether the joint operators have co-signed the lease or not. Where BP is not the operator of a joint operation, BPs share of the lease expense and future minimum lease payments is included in the amounts shown, whether BP has co-signed the lease or not.
Typical durations of operating leases are up to forty years for leases of land and buildings, up to fifteen years for leases of ships and commercial vehicles and up to ten years for leases of plant and machinery.
The group has entered into a number of structured operating leases for ships and in most cases the lease rental payments vary with market interest rates. The variable portion of the lease payments above or below the amount based on the market interest rate prevailing at inception of the lease is treated as contingent rental expense. The group also routinely enters into bareboat charters, time-charters and voyage-charters for ships on standard industry terms.
The most significant items of plant and machinery hired under operating leases are drilling rigs used in the Upstream segment. At 31 December 2015, the future minimum lease payments relating to drilling rigs amounted to $4,783 million (2014 $8,180 million).
Commercial vehicles hired under operating leases are primarily railcars. Retail service station sites and office accommodation are the main items in the land and buildings category.
The terms and conditions of these operating leases do not impose any significant financial restrictions on the group. Some of the leases of ships and buildings allow for renewals at BPs option, and some of the groups operating leases contain escalation clauses.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 147 |
28. Financial instruments and financial risk factors
The accounting classification of each category of financial instruments, and their carrying amounts, are set out below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 | Note |
Loans and
receivables |
Available-
for-sale financial assets |
Held-to-
maturity investments |
At fair value
or loss |
Derivative
hedging instruments |
Financial
liabilities measured at amortized cost |
Total carrying
amount |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other investments equity shares |
17 | | 397 | | | | | 397 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
other |
17 | | 219 | | 605 | | | 824 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
801 | | | | | | 801 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
19 | 22,214 | | | | | | 22,214 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
29 | | | | 7,700 | 951 | | 8,651 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
24 | 21,402 | 2,859 | 2,128 | | | | 26,389 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables |
21 | | | | | | (32,094 | ) | (32,094 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
29 | | | | (6,139 | ) | (1,383 | ) | | (7,522 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accruals |
| | | | | (7,151 | ) | (7,151 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance debt |
25 | | | | | | (53,168 | ) | (53,168 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
44,417 | 3,475 | 2,128 | 2,166 | (432 | ) | (92,413 | ) | (40,659 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other investments equity shares |
17 | | 420 | | | | | 420 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
other |
17 | | 538 | | 599 | | | 1,137 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
992 | | | | | | 992 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
19 | 30,551 | | | | | | 30,551 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
29 | | | | 8,511 | 1,096 | | 9,607 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
24 | 23,504 | 2,989 | 3,270 | | | | 29,763 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables |
21 | | | | | | (40,327 | ) | (40,327 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
29 | | | | (6,100 | ) | (788 | ) | | (6,888 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accruals |
| | | | | (7,963 | ) | (7,963 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance debt |
25 | | | | | | (52,854 | ) | (52,854 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
55,047 | 3,947 | 3,270 | 3,010 | 308 | (101,144 | ) | (35,562 | ) |
The fair value of finance debt is shown in Note 25. For all other financial instruments, the carrying amount is either the fair value, or approximates the fair value.
Financial risk factors
The group is exposed to a number of different financial risks arising from natural business exposures as well as its use of financial instruments including market risks relating to commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates; credit risk; and liquidity risk.
The group financial risk committee (GFRC) advises the group chief financial officer (CFO) who oversees the management of these risks. The GFRC is chaired by the CFO and consists of a group of senior managers including the group treasurer and the heads of the group finance, tax and the integrated supply and trading functions. The purpose of the committee is to advise on financial risks and the appropriate financial risk governance framework for the group. The committee provides assurance to the CFO and the group chief executive (GCE), and via the GCE to the board, that the groups financial risk-taking activity is governed by appropriate policies and procedures and that financial risks are identified, measured and managed in accordance with group policies and group risk appetite.
The groups trading activities in the oil, natural gas, LNG and power markets are managed within the integrated supply and trading function, while the activities in the financial markets are managed by the treasury function, working under the compliance and control structure of the integrated supply and trading function. All derivative activity is carried out by specialist teams that have the appropriate skills, experience and supervision. These teams are subject to close financial and management control.
The integrated supply and trading function maintains formal governance processes that provide oversight of market risk, credit risk and operational risk associated with trading activity. A policy and risk committee monitors and validates limits and risk exposures, reviews incidents and validates risk-related policies, methodologies and procedures. A commitments committee approves value-at-risk delegations, the trading of new products, instruments and strategies and material commitments.
In addition, the integrated supply and trading function undertakes derivative activity for risk management purposes under a control framework as described more fully below.
(a) Market risk
Market risk is the risk or uncertainty arising from possible market price movements and their impact on the future performance of a business. The primary commodity price risks that the group is exposed to include oil, natural gas and power prices that could adversely affect the value of the groups financial assets, liabilities or expected future cash flows. The group enters into derivatives in a well-established entrepreneurial trading operation. In addition, the group has developed a control framework aimed at managing the volatility inherent in certain of its natural business exposures. In accordance with the control framework the group enters into various transactions using derivatives for risk management purposes.
The major components of market risk are commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange risk and interest rate risk, each of which is discussed below.
148 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
28. Financial instruments and financial risk factors continued
(i) Commodity price risk
The groups integrated supply and trading function uses conventional financial and commodity instruments and physical cargoes and pipeline positions available in the related commodity markets. Oil and natural gas swaps, options and futures are used to mitigate price risk. Power trading is undertaken using a combination of over-the-counter forward contracts and other derivative contracts, including options and futures. This activity is on both a standalone basis and in conjunction with gas derivatives in relation to gas-generated power margin. In addition, NGLs are traded around certain US inventory locations using over-the-counter forward contracts in conjunction with over-the-counter swaps, options and physical inventories.
The group measures market risk exposure arising from its trading positions in liquid periods using value-at-risk techniques. These techniques make a statistical assessment of the market risk arising from possible future changes in market prices over a one-day holding period. The value-at-risk measure is supplemented by stress testing. Trading activity occurring in liquid periods is subject to value-at-risk limits for each trading activity and for this trading activity in total. The board has delegated a limit of $100 million value at risk in support of this trading activity. Alternative measures are used to monitor exposures which are outside liquid periods and which cannot be actively risk-managed.
(ii) Foreign currency exchange risk
Where the group enters into foreign currency exchange contracts for entrepreneurial trading purposes the activity is controlled using trading value-at-risk techniques as explained above.
Since BP has global operations, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates can have a significant effect on the groups reported results. The effects of most exchange rate fluctuations are absorbed in business operating results through changing cost competitiveness, lags in market adjustment to movements in rates and translation differences accounted for on specific transactions. For this reason, the total effect of exchange rate fluctuations is not identifiable separately in the groups reported results. The main underlying economic currency of the groups cash flows is the US dollar. This is because BPs major product, oil, is priced internationally in US dollars. BPs foreign currency exchange management policy is to limit economic and material transactional exposures arising from currency movements against the US dollar. The group co-ordinates the handling of foreign currency exchange risks centrally, by netting off naturally-occurring opposite exposures wherever possible, and then managing any material residual foreign currency exchange risks.
The group manages these exposures by constantly reviewing the foreign currency economic value at risk and aims to manage such risk to keep the 12-month foreign currency value at risk below $400 million. At no point over the past three years did the value at risk exceed the maximum risk limit. The most significant exposures relate to capital expenditure commitments and other UK, Eurozone and Australian operational requirements, for which hedging programmes are in place and hedge accounting is applied as outlined in Note 1.
For highly probable forecast capital expenditures the group locks in the US dollar cost of non-US dollar supplies by using currency forwards and futures. The main exposures are sterling, euro, Australian dollar and South Korean won. At 31 December 2015 the most significant open contracts in place were for $627 million sterling (2014 $321 million sterling).
For other UK, Eurozone and Australian operational requirements the group uses cylinders (purchased call and sold put options) to manage the estimated exposures on a 12-month rolling basis. At 31 December 2015, the open positions relating to cylinders consisted of receive sterling, pay US dollar cylinders for $2,479 million (2014 $2,787 million); receive euro, pay US dollar cylinders for $560 million (2014 $867 million); receive Australian dollar, pay US dollar cylinders for $312 million (2014 $418 million).
In addition, most of the groups borrowings are in US dollars or are hedged with respect to the US dollar. At 31 December 2015, the total foreign currency net borrowings not swapped into US dollars amounted to $826 million (2014 $871 million).
(iii) Interest rate risk
Where the group enters into money market contracts for entrepreneurial trading purposes the activity is controlled using value-at-risk techniques as described above.
BP is also exposed to interest rate risk from the possibility that changes in interest rates will affect future cash flows or the fair values of its financial instruments, principally finance debt. While the group issues debt in a variety of currencies based on market opportunities, it uses derivatives to swap the debt to a floating rate exposure, mainly to US dollar floating, but in certain defined circumstances maintains a US dollar fixed rate exposure for a proportion of debt. The proportion of floating rate debt net of interest rate swaps at 31 December 2015 was 79% of total finance debt outstanding (2014 71%). The weighted average interest rate on finance debt at 31 December 2015 was 2% (2014 2%) and the weighted average maturity of fixed rate debt was five years (2014 four years).
The groups earnings are sensitive to changes in interest rates on the floating rate element of the groups finance debt. If the interest rates applicable to floating rate instruments were to have increased by one percentage point on 1 January 2016, it is estimated that the groups finance costs for 2016 would increase by approximately $419 million (2014 $377 million increase).
(b) Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument will fail to perform or fail to pay amounts due causing financial loss to the group and arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments and deposits with financial institutions and principally from credit exposures to customers relating to outstanding receivables. Credit exposure also exists in relation to guarantees issued by group companies under which the outstanding exposure incremental to that recognized on the balance sheet at 31 December 2015 was $35 million (2014 $83 million) in respect of liabilities of joint ventures and associates and $163 million (2014 $244 million) in respect of liabilities of other third parties.
The group has a credit policy, approved by the CFO that is designed to ensure that consistent processes are in place throughout the group to measure and control credit risk. Credit risk is considered as part of the risk-reward balance of doing business. On entering into any business contract the extent to which the arrangement exposes the group to credit risk is considered. Key requirements of the policy include segregation of credit approval authorities from any sales, marketing or trading teams authorized to incur credit risk; the establishment of credit systems and processes to ensure that all counterparty exposure is rated and that all counterparty exposure and limits can be monitored and reported; and the timely identification and reporting of any non-approved credit exposures and credit losses. While each segment is responsible for its own credit risk management and reporting consistent with group policy, the treasury function holds group-wide credit risk authority and oversight responsibility for exposure to banks and financial institutions.
The maximum credit exposure associated with financial assets is equal to the carrying amount. The group does not aim to remove credit risk entirely but expects to experience a certain level of credit losses. As at 31 December 2015, the group had in place credit enhancements designed to mitigate approximately $10.9 billion of credit risk (2014 $10.8 billion). Reports are regularly prepared and presented to the GFRC that cover the groups overall credit exposure and expected loss trends, exposure by segment, and overall quality of the portfolio.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 149 |
28. Financial instruments and financial risk factors continued
Management information used to monitor credit risk indicates that 81% (2014 82%) of total unmitigated credit exposure relates to counterparties of investment-grade credit quality.
$ million | ||||||||||
Trade and other receivables at 31 December | 2015 | 2014 | ||||||||
Neither impaired nor past due |
21,064 | 28,519 | ||||||||
Impaired (net of provision) |
22 | 37 | ||||||||
Not impaired and past due in the following periods |
||||||||||
within 30 days |
414 | 841 | ||||||||
31 to 60 days |
75 | 249 | ||||||||
61 to 90 days |
118 | 178 | ||||||||
over 90 days |
521 | 727 | ||||||||
22,214 | 30,551 |
Movements in the impairment provision for trade receivables are shown in Note 20.
Financial instruments subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangements and similar agreements
The following table shows the amounts recognized for financial assets and liabilities which are subject to offsetting arrangements on a gross basis, and the amounts offset in the balance sheet.
Amounts which cannot be offset under IFRS, but which could be settled net under the terms of master netting agreements if certain conditions arise, and collateral received or pledged, are also presented in the table to show the total net exposure of the group.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
Gross
(liabilities) |
Amounts
set off |
Net amounts
presented on the balance sheet |
Related amounts not set off
in the balance sheet |
Net amount | |||||||||||||||||||||
Master
netting arrangements |
Cash
collateral (received) pledged |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
10,206 | (1,859 | ) | 8,347 | (1,109 | ) | (297 | ) | 6,941 | |||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
(9,280 | ) | 1,859 | (7,421 | ) | 1,109 | | (6,312 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
7,091 | (3,689 | ) | 3,402 | (322 | ) | (161 | ) | 2,919 | |||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
(5,720 | ) | 3,689 | (2,031 | ) | 322 | | (1,709 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets |
11,515 | (2,383 | ) | 9,132 | (1,164 | ) | (458 | ) | 7,510 | |||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities |
(8,971 | ) | 2,383 | (6,588 | ) | 1,164 | | (5,424 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Trade receivables |
10,502 | (6,080 | ) | 4,422 | (485 | ) | (145 | ) | 3,792 | |||||||||||||||||
Trade payables |
(9,062 | ) | 6,080 | (2,982 | ) | 485 | | (2,497 | ) |
(c) Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that suitable sources of funding for the groups business activities may not be available. The groups liquidity is managed centrally with operating units forecasting their cash and currency requirements to the central treasury function. Unless restricted by local regulations, generally subsidiaries pool their cash surpluses to treasury, which will then arrange to fund other subsidiaries requirements, or invest any net surplus in the market or arrange for necessary external borrowings, while managing the groups overall net currency positions.
Standard & Poors Ratings long-term credit rating for BP is A negative (stable outlook) and Moodys Investors Service rating is A2 (rating under review from positive).
During 2015, $8 billion of long-term taxable bonds were issued with terms ranging from 1 to 11 years. Commercial paper is issued at competitive rates to meet short-term borrowing requirements as and when needed.
As a further liquidity measure, the group continues to maintain suitable levels of cash and cash equivalents, amounting to $26.4 billion at 31 December 2015 (2014 $29.8 billion), primarily invested with highly rated banks or money market funds and readily accessible at immediate and short notice. At 31 December 2015, the group had substantial amounts of undrawn borrowing facilities available, consisting of $7,375 million of standby facilities, of which $6,975 million is available to draw and repay until the first half of 2018, and $400 million is available to draw and repay until April 2017. These facilities were renegotiated during 2015 with 26 international banks, and borrowings under them would be at pre-agreed rates.
The group also has committed letter of credit (LC) facilities totalling $6,850 million with a number of banks, allowing LCs to be issued for a maximum two-year duration. There were also uncommitted secured LC facilities in place at 31 December 2015 for $2,410 million, which are secured against inventories or receivables when utilized. The facilities only terminate by either party giving a stipulated termination notice to the other.
150 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
28. Financial instruments and financial risk factors continued
The amounts shown for finance debt in the table below include future minimum lease payments with respect to finance leases. The table also shows the timing of cash outflows relating to trade and other payables and accruals.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and
other payables |
Accruals |
Finance
debt |
Interest
relating to finance debt |
Trade and
payables |
Accruals |
Finance
debt |
Interest
relating to finance debt |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Within one year |
29,743 | 6,261 | 6,944 | 928 | 37,342 | 7,102 | 6,877 | 892 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 to 2 years |
971 | 380 | 5,796 | 812 | 708 | 493 | 6,311 | 776 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2 to 3 years |
1,231 | 138 | 6,208 | 704 | 757 | 119 | 5,652 | 672 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3 to 4 years |
56 | 98 | 6,103 | 592 | 1,446 | 76 | 5,226 | 578 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4 to 5 years |
17 | 74 | 6,354 | 478 | 23 | 41 | 6,056 | 479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5 to 10 years |
38 | 167 | 17,651 | 1,068 | 24 | 95 | 19,504 | 1,111 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Over 10 years |
38 | 33 | 4,112 | 402 | 27 | 37 | 3,228 | 521 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
32,094 | 7,151 | 53,168 | 4,984 | 40,327 | 7,963 | 52,854 | 5,029 |
The group manages liquidity risk associated with derivative contracts, other than derivative hedging instruments, based on the expected maturities of both derivative assets and liabilities as indicated in Note 29. Management does not currently anticipate any cash flows that could be of a significantly different amount, or could occur earlier than the expected maturity analysis provided.
The table below shows the timing of cash outflows for derivative financial instruments entered into for the purpose of managing interest rate and foreign currency exchange risk associated with net debt, whether or not hedge accounting is applied, based upon contractual payment dates. The amounts reflect the gross settlement amount where the pay leg of a derivative will be settled separately from the receive leg, as in the case of cross-currency swaps hedging non-US dollar finance debt. The swaps are with high investment-grade counterparties and therefore the settlement-day risk exposure is considered to be negligible. Not shown in the table are the gross settlement amounts (inflows) for the receive leg of derivatives that are settled separately from the pay leg, which amount to $15,706 million at 31 December 2015 (2014 $14,615 million) to be received on the same day as the related cash outflows. For further information on our derivative financial instruments, see Note 29.
$ million | ||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||
Within one year |
2,959 | 293 | ||||||||
1 to 2 years |
2,685 | 2,959 | ||||||||
2 to 3 years |
1,505 | 2,690 | ||||||||
3 to 4 years |
1,700 | 1,505 | ||||||||
4 to 5 years |
1,678 | 1,700 | ||||||||
5 to 10 years |
5,500 | 5,764 | ||||||||
Over 10 years |
2,739 | 1,325 | ||||||||
18,766 | 16,236 |
29. Derivative financial instruments
In the normal course of business the group enters into derivative financial instruments (derivatives) to manage its normal business exposures in relation to commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates, including management of the balance between floating rate and fixed rate debt, consistent with risk management policies and objectives. An outline of the groups financial risks and the objectives and policies pursued in relation to those risks is set out in Note 28. Additionally, the group has a well-established entrepreneurial trading operation that is undertaken in conjunction with these activities using a similar range of contracts.
For information on significant estimates and judgements made in relation to the application of hedge accounting and the valuation of derivatives see Derivative financial instruments within Note 1.
The fair values of derivative financial instruments at 31 December are set out below.
Exchange traded derivatives are valued using closing prices provided by the exchange as at the balance sheet date. These derivatives are categorized within level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Over-the-counter (OTC) financial swaps and physical commodity sale and purchase contracts are generally valued using readily available information in the public markets and quotations provided by brokers and price index developers. These quotes are corroborated with market data and are categorized within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
In certain less liquid markets, or for longer-term contracts, forward prices are not as readily available. In these circumstances, OTC financial swaps and physical commodity sale and purchase contracts are valued using internally developed methodologies that consider historical relationships between various commodities, and that result in managements best estimate of fair value. These contracts are categorized within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 151 |
29. Derivative financial instruments continued
Financial OTC and physical commodity options are valued using industry standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic factors. The degree to which these inputs are observable in the forward markets determines whether the option is categorized within level 2 or level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
Fair value
asset |
Fair value
liability |
Fair value
asset |
Fair value
liability |
|||||||||||||||
Derivatives held for trading |
||||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives |
144 | (1,811 | ) | 122 | (902 | ) | ||||||||||||
Oil price derivatives |
2,390 | (1,257 | ) | 3,133 | (1,976 | ) | ||||||||||||
Natural gas price derivatives |
3,942 | (2,536 | ) | 3,859 | (2,518 | ) | ||||||||||||
Power price derivatives |
920 | (434 | ) | 922 | (404 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other derivatives |
292 | | 389 | | ||||||||||||||
7,688 | (6,038 | ) | 8,425 | (5,800 | ) | |||||||||||||
Embedded derivatives |
||||||||||||||||||
Commodity price contracts |
12 | (101 | ) | 86 | (300 | ) | ||||||||||||
12 | (101 | ) | 86 | (300 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges |
||||||||||||||||||
Currency forwards, futures and cylinders |
9 | (71 | ) | 1 | (161 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
| (147 | ) | | (97 | ) | ||||||||||||
9 | (218 | ) | 1 | (258 | ) | |||||||||||||
Fair value hedges |
||||||||||||||||||
Currency forwards, futures and swaps |
33 | (1,108 | ) | 78 | (518 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
909 | (57 | ) | 1,017 | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||
942 | (1,165 | ) | 1,095 | (530 | ) | |||||||||||||
8,651 | (7,522 | ) | 9,607 | (6,888 | ) | |||||||||||||
Of which current |
4,242 | (3,239 | ) | 5,165 | (3,689 | ) | ||||||||||||
non-current |
4,409 | (4,283 | ) | 4,442 | (3,199 | ) |
Derivatives held for trading
The group maintains active trading positions in a variety of derivatives. The contracts may be entered into for risk management purposes, to satisfy supply requirements or for entrepreneurial trading. Certain contracts are classified as held for trading, regardless of their original business objective, and are recognized at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the income statement. Trading activities are undertaken by using a range of contract types in combination to create incremental gains by arbitraging prices between markets, locations and time periods. The net of these exposures is monitored using market value-at-risk techniques as described in Note 28.
The following tables show further information on the fair value of derivatives and other financial instruments held for trading purposes.
Derivative assets held for trading have the following fair values and maturities.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than
1 year |
1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives |
132 | 10 | 1 | 1 | | | 144 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil price derivatives |
1,729 | 432 | 130 | 58 | 37 | 4 | 2,390 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas price derivatives |
1,707 | 639 | 390 | 283 | 202 | 721 | 3,942 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Power price derivatives |
459 | 164 | 103 | 79 | 47 | 68 | 920 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other derivatives |
182 | 110 | | | | | 292 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
4,209 | 1,355 | 624 | 421 | 286 | 793 | 7,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than
1 year |
1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives |
120 | | 2 | | | | 122 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil price derivatives |
2,434 | 416 | 185 | 63 | 31 | 4 | 3,133 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas price derivatives |
1,991 | 644 | 261 | 202 | 160 | 601 | 3,859 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Power price derivatives |
488 | 203 | 87 | 50 | 39 | 55 | 922 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other derivatives |
70 | 97 | 161 | 61 | | | 389 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,103 | 1,360 | 696 | 376 | 230 | 660 | 8,425 |
At both 31 December 2015 and 2014 the group had contingent consideration receivable in respect of the disposal of the Texas City refinery. The sale agreement contained an embedded derivative the whole agreement has, consequently, been designated at fair value through profit or loss and shown within other derivatives held for trading, and falls within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The valuation depends on refinery throughput and future margins.
152 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
29. Derivative financial instruments continued
Derivative liabilities held for trading have the following fair values and maturities.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than
1 year |
1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives |
(499 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (347 | ) | (79 | ) | (882 | ) | (1,811 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Oil price derivatives |
(1,053 | ) | (163 | ) | (26 | ) | (10 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | (1,257 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Natural gas price derivatives |
(1,037 | ) | (382 | ) | (210 | ) | (146 | ) | (162 | ) | (599 | ) | (2,536 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Power price derivatives |
(246 | ) | (70 | ) | (31 | ) | (34 | ) | (17 | ) | (36 | ) | (434 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
(2,835 | ) | (617 | ) | (269 | ) | (537 | ) | (260 | ) | (1,520 | ) | (6,038 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than
1 year |
1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency derivatives |
(69 | ) | (180 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | (192 | ) | (459 | ) | (902 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Oil price derivatives |
(1,714 | ) | (186 | ) | (61 | ) | (8 | ) | (6 | ) | (1 | ) | (1,976 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Natural gas price derivatives |
(1,310 | ) | (292 | ) | (144 | ) | (117 | ) | (99 | ) | (556 | ) | (2,518 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Power price derivatives |
(217 | ) | (127 | ) | (39 | ) | (10 | ) | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | (404 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
(3,310 | ) | (785 | ) | (245 | ) | (136 | ) | (301 | ) | (1,023 | ) | (5,800 | ) |
The following table shows the fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities held for trading, analysed by maturity period and by methodology of fair value estimation. This information is presented on a gross basis, that is, before netting by counterparty.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than
1 year |
1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of derivative assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 |
109 | | | | | | 109 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 2 |
4,946 | 1,137 | 402 | 213 | 68 | 50 | 6,816 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 3 |
684 | 449 | 271 | 240 | 230 | 748 | 2,622 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
5,739 | 1,586 | 673 | 453 | 298 | 798 | 9,547 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: netting by counterparty |
(1,530 | ) | (231 | ) | (49 | ) | (32 | ) | (12 | ) | (5 | ) | (1,859 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
4,209 | 1,355 | 624 | 421 | 286 | 793 | 7,688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 |
(104 | ) | | | | | | (104 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Level 2 |
(4,083 | ) | (700 | ) | (177 | ) | (423 | ) | (124 | ) | (889 | ) | (6,396 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Level 3 |
(178 | ) | (148 | ) | (141 | ) | (146 | ) | (148 | ) | (636 | ) | (1,397 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
(4,365 | ) | (848 | ) | (318 | ) | (569 | ) | (272 | ) | (1,525 | ) | (7,897 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Less: netting by counterparty |
1,530 | 231 | 49 | 32 | 12 | 5 | 1,859 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(2,835 | ) | (617 | ) | (269 | ) | (537 | ) | (260 | ) | (1,520 | ) | (6,038 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net fair value |
1,374 | 738 | 355 | (116 | ) | 26 | (727 | ) | 1,650 | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than
1 year |
1-2 years | 2-3 years | 3-4 years | 4-5 years |
Over 5 years |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of derivative assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 |
170 | | | | | | 170 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 2 |
6,388 | 1,353 | 354 | 130 | 71 | 20 | 8,316 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 3 |
483 | 374 | 409 | 255 | 159 | 642 | 2,322 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
7,041 | 1,727 | 763 | 385 | 230 | 662 | 10,808 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: netting by counterparty |
(1,938 | ) | (367 | ) | (67 | ) | (9 | ) | | (2 | ) | (2,383 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
5,103 | 1,360 | 696 | 376 | 230 | 660 | 8,425 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of derivative liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 |
(37 | ) | | | | | | (37 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Level 2 |
(4,905 | ) | (1,017 | ) | (197 | ) | (45 | ) | (202 | ) | (488 | ) | (6,854 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Level 3 |
(306 | ) | (135 | ) | (115 | ) | (100 | ) | (99 | ) | (537 | ) | (1,292 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
(5,248 | ) | (1,152 | ) | (312 | ) | (145 | ) | (301 | ) | (1,025 | ) | (8,183 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Less: netting by counterparty |
1,938 | 367 | 67 | 9 | | 2 | 2,383 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(3,310 | ) | (785 | ) | (245 | ) | (136 | ) | (301 | ) | (1,023 | ) | (5,800 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net fair value |
1,793 | 575 | 451 | 240 | (71 | ) | (363 | ) | 2,625 |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 153 |
29. Derivative financial instruments continued
Level 3 derivatives
The following table shows the changes during the year in the net fair value of derivatives held for trading purposes within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil price |
Natural gas price |
Power
price |
Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net fair value of contracts at 1 January 2015 |
246 | 181 | 214 | 389 | 1,030 | |||||||||||||||||
Gains (losses) recognized in the income statement |
(24 | ) | 272 | 79 | 92 | 419 | ||||||||||||||||
Inception fair value of new contracts |
126 | 14 | 87 | | 227 | |||||||||||||||||
Settlements |
(20 | ) | (40 | ) | (72 | ) | (189 | ) | (321 | ) | ||||||||||||
Transfers out of level 3 |
| (107 | ) | (23 | ) | | (130 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net fair value of contracts at 31 December 2015 |
328 | 320 | 285 | 292 | 1,225 | |||||||||||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil price |
Natural gas
price |
Power
price |
Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net fair value of contracts at 1 January 2014 |
(18 | ) | 313 | 86 | 475 | 856 | ||||||||||||||||
Gains recognized in the income statement |
270 | 133 | 79 | 94 | 576 | |||||||||||||||||
Inception fair value of new contracts |
80 | 19 | 62 | | 161 | |||||||||||||||||
Settlements |
(86 | ) | (56 | ) | (13 | ) | (180 | ) | (335 | ) | ||||||||||||
Transfers out of level 3 |
| (228 | ) | | | (228 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net fair value of contracts at 31 December 2014 |
246 | 181 | 214 | 389 | 1,030 |
The amount recognized in the income statement for the year relating to level 3 held-for-trading derivatives still held at 31 December 2015 was a $293 million gain (2014 $456 million gain related to derivatives still held at 31 December 2014).
Derivative gains and losses
Gains and losses relating to derivative contracts are included within sales and other operating revenues and within purchases in the income statement depending upon the nature of the activity and type of contract involved. The contract types treated in this way include futures, options, swaps and certain forward sales and forward purchases contracts, and relate to both currency and commodity trading activities. Gains or losses arise on contracts entered into for risk management purposes, optimization activity and entrepreneurial trading. They also arise on certain contracts that are for normal procurement or sales activity for the group but that are required to be fair valued under accounting standards. Also included within sales and other operating revenues are gains and losses on inventory held for trading purposes. The total amount relating to all these items (excluding gains and losses on realized physical derivative contracts that have been reflected gross in the income statement within sales and purchases) was a net gain of $5,508 million (2014 $6,154 million net gain and 2013 $587 million net gain). This number does not include gains and losses on realized physical derivative contracts that have been reflected gross in the income statement within sales and purchases or the change in value of transportation and storage contracts which are not recognized under IFRS, but does include the associated financially settled contracts. The net amount for actual gains and losses relating to derivative contracts and all related items therefore differs significantly from the amount disclosed above.
Embedded derivatives
The group has embedded derivatives relating to certain natural gas contracts. The fair value gain on commodity price embedded derivatives included within distribution and administration expenses was $120 million (2014 gain of $430 million, 2013 gain of $459 million).
Cash flow hedges
At 31 December 2015, the group held currency forwards, futures contracts and cylinders and cross-currency interest rate swaps that were being used to hedge the foreign currency risk of highly probable forecast transactions and floating rate finance debt. Note 28 outlines the groups approach to foreign currency exchange risk management. For cash flow hedges the group only claims hedge accounting for the intrinsic value on the currency with any fair value attributable to time value taken immediately to the income statement. The amounts remaining in equity at 31 December 2015 in relation to these cash flow hedges consist of deferred losses of $55 million maturing in 2016, deferred losses of $15 million maturing in 2017 and deferred losses of $3 million maturing in 2018 and beyond.
Two of the contracts to acquire an 18.5% interest in Rosneft, which completed in March 2013, were designated as hedging instruments in a cash flow hedge. A cumulative charge of $651 million has been recognized in other comprehensive income, of which a charge of $2,061 million arose in 2013. This loss will only be reclassified to the income statement if the investment in Rosneft is either sold or impaired.
Fair value hedges
At 31 December 2015, the group held interest rate and cross-currency interest rate swap contracts as fair value hedges of the interest rate risk on fixed rate debt issued by the group. The loss on the hedging derivative instruments recognized in the income statement in 2015 was $788 million (2014 $14 million loss and 2013 $1,240 million loss) offset by a gain on the fair value of the finance debt of $833 million (2014 $8 million gain and 2013 $1,228 million gain).
The interest rate and cross-currency interest rate swaps mature within one to eleven years, and have the same maturity terms as the debt that they are hedging. They are used to convert sterling, euro, Swiss franc, Australian dollar, Canadian dollar, Norwegian Krone and Hong Kong dollar denominated fixed rate borrowings into floating rate debt. Note 28 outlines the groups approach to interest rate and foreign currency exchange risk management.
154 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
The allotted, called up and fully paid share capital at 31 December was as follows:
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued |
Shares
thousand |
$ million |
Shares
thousand |
$ million |
Shares
thousand |
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||
8% cumulative first preference shares of £1 each a |
7,233 | 12 | 7,233 | 12 | 7,233 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||
9% cumulative second preference shares of £1 each a |
5,473 | 9 | 5,473 | 9 | 5,473 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
21 | 21 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary shares of 25 cents each |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
20,005,961 | 5,002 | 20,426,632 | 5,108 | 20,959,159 | 5,240 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issue of new shares for the scrip dividend programme |
102,810 | 26 | 165,644 | 41 | 202,124 | 51 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issue of new shares for employee share-based payment plans b |
| | 25,598 | 6 | 18,203 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of ordinary share capital c |
| | (611,913 | ) | (153 | ) | (752,854 | ) | (188 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
20,108,771 | 5,028 | 20,005,961 | 5,002 | 20,426,632 | 5,108 | ||||||||||||||||||||
5,049 | 5,023 | 5,129 |
a | The nominal amount of 8% cumulative first preference shares and 9% cumulative second preference shares that can be in issue at any time shall not exceed £10,000,000 for each class of preference shares. |
b | Consideration received relating to the issue of new shares for employee share-based payment plans amounted to $207 million in 2014 and $116 million in 2013. |
c | There were no shares repurchased in 2015 (2014 shares were repurchased for a total consideration of $4,796 million, including transaction costs of $26 million and 2013 shares were repurchased for a total consideration of $5,493 million, including transaction costs of $30 million). All shares purchased were for cancellation. |
Voting on substantive resolutions tabled at a general meeting is on a poll. On a poll, shareholders present in person or by proxy have two votes for every £5 in nominal amount of the first and second preference shares held and one vote for every ordinary share held. On a show-of-hands vote on other resolutions (procedural matters) at a general meeting, shareholders present in person or by proxy have one vote each.
In the event of the winding up of the company, preference shareholders would be entitled to a sum equal to the capital paid up on the preference shares, plus an amount in respect of accrued and unpaid dividends and a premium equal to the higher of (i) 10% of the capital paid up on the preference shares and (ii) the excess of the average market price of such shares on the London Stock Exchange during the previous six months over par value.
Treasury shares a
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
thousand |
Nominal value
$ million |
Shares
thousand |
Nominal value
$ million |
Shares
thousand |
Nominal value
$ million |
|||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
1,811,297 | 453 | 1,833,544 | 458 | 1,864,510 | 466 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases for settlement of employee share plans |
51,142 | 13 | 49,559 | 12 | 38,766 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Shares re-issued for employee share-based payment plans |
(106,112 | ) | (27 | ) | (71,806 | ) | (17 | ) | (69,732 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
1,756,327 | 439 | 1,811,297 | 453 | 1,833,544 | 458 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Of which shares held in treasury by BP |
1,727,763 | 432 | 1,771,103 | 443 | 1,787,939 | 447 | ||||||||||||||||||||
shares held in ESOP trusts |
18,453 | 4 | 34,169 | 9 | 32,748 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
shares held by BP b |
10,111 | 3 | 6,025 | 1 | 12,857 | 3 |
a | See Note 31 for definition of treasury shares. |
b | Held by the group in the form of ADSs to meet the requirements of employee share-based payment plans in the US. |
For each year presented, the balance at 1 January represents the maximum number of shares held in treasury by BP during the year, representing 8.9% (2014 8.8% and 2013 8.7%) of the called-up ordinary share capital of the company.
During 2015, the movement in shares held in treasury by BP represented less than 0.2% (2014 less than 0.1% and 2013 less than 0.2%) of the ordinary share capital of the company.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 155 |
Share
capital |
Share
premium account |
Capital
redemption reserve |
Merger
reserve |
Total
share capital and capital reserves |
||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2015 |
5,023 | 10,260 | 1,413 | 27,206 | 43,902 | |||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences (including recycling) a |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale investments (including recycling) |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges (including recycling) |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax a |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Remeasurements of the net pension and other post-retirement benefit liability or asset |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends |
26 | (26 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments, net of tax b |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Share of equity-accounted entities changes in equity, net of tax |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Transactions involving non-controlling interests |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
5,049 | 10,234 | 1,413 | 27,206 | 43,902 | |||||||||||||||||
Share
capital |
Share
premium account |
Capital
redemption reserve |
Merger
reserve |
Total
share capital and capital reserves |
||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2014 |
5,129 | 10,061 | 1,260 | 27,206 | 43,656 | |||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences (including recycling) a |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges (including recycling) |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax a |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Remeasurements of the net pension and other post-retirement benefit liability or asset |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends |
41 | (41 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchases of ordinary share capital |
(153 | ) | | 153 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments, net of tax b |
6 | 240 | | | 246 | |||||||||||||||||
Share of equity-accounted entities changes in equity, net of tax |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Transactions involving non-controlling interests |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2014 |
5,023 | 10,260 | 1,413 | 27,206 | 43,902 | |||||||||||||||||
Share
capital |
Share
premium account |
Capital
redemption reserve |
Merger
reserve |
Total
share capital and capital reserves |
||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January 2013 |
5,261 | 9,974 | 1,072 | 27,206 | 43,513 | |||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences (including recycling) |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Available-for-sale investments (including recycling) |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges (including recycling) |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Other |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Remeasurements of the net pension and other post-retirement benefit liability or asset |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends |
51 | (51 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Repurchases of ordinary share capital |
(188 | ) | | 188 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Share-based payments, net of tax b |
5 | 138 | | | 143 | |||||||||||||||||
Share of equity-accounted entities changes in equity, net of tax |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Transactions involving non-controlling interests |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2013 |
5,129 | 10,061 | 1,260 | 27,206 | 43,656 |
a | Principally affected by a weakening of the Russian rouble compared to the US dollar. |
b | Includes new share issues and movements in treasury shares where these relate to employee share-based payment plans. |
156 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
shares |
Foreign
currency translation reserve |
Available-
for-sale investments |
Cash flow
hedges |
Total
fair value
|
Profit and
account |
BP
shareholders equity |
Non-
controlling interests |
Total equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(20,719 | ) | (3,409 | ) | 1 | (898 | ) | (897 | ) | 92,564 | 111,441 | 1,201 | 112,642 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (6,482 | ) | (6,482 | ) | 82 | (6,400 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (3,858 | ) | | | | | (3,858 | ) | (41 | ) | (3,899 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 73 | 73 | | 73 | | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (814 | ) | (814 | ) | | (814 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 80 | 80 | | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2,742 | 2,742 | | 2,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| (3,858 | ) | 1 | 73 | 74 | (4,475 | ) | (8,259 | ) | 41 | (8,218 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (6,659 | ) | (6,659 | ) | (91 | ) | (6,750 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
755 | | | | | (99 | ) | 656 | | 656 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 40 | 40 | | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | 20 | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(19,964 | ) | (7,267 | ) | 2 | (825 | ) | (823 | ) | 81,368 | 97,216 | 1,171 | 98,387 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
shares |
Foreign
currency translation reserve |
Available-
for-sale
|
Cash flow
hedges |
Total
fair value
|
Profit and loss account |
BP
shareholders equity |
Non-
controlling interests |
Total equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(20,971 | ) | 3,525 | | (695 | ) | (695 | ) | 103,787 | 129,302 | 1,105 | 130,407 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 3,780 | 3,780 | 223 | 4,003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (6,934 | ) | 1 | | 1 | | (6,933 | ) | (32 | ) | (6,965 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | (203 | ) | (203 | ) | | (203 | ) | | (203 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (2,584 | ) | (2,584 | ) | | (2,584 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 289 | 289 | | 289 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (3,256 | ) | (3,256 | ) | | (3,256 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 4 | 4 | | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (6,934 | ) | 1 | (203 | ) | (202 | ) | (1,767 | ) | (8,903 | ) | 191 | (8,712 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (5,850 | ) | (5,850 | ) | (255 | ) | (6,105 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (3,366 | ) | (3,366 | ) | | (3,366 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
252 | | | | | (313 | ) | 185 | | 185 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 73 | 73 | | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | 160 | 160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(20,719 | ) | (3,409 | ) | 1 | (898 | ) | (897 | ) | 92,564 | 111,441 | 1,201 | 112,642 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury
shares |
Foreign
currency translation reserve |
Available-
for-sale
|
Cash flow
hedges |
Total
fair value
|
Profit and loss account |
BP
shareholders equity |
Non-
controlling interests |
Total equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(21,054 | ) | 5,128 | 685 | 1,090 | 1,775 | 89,184 | 118,546 | 1,206 | 119,752 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 23,451 | 23,451 | 307 | 23,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1,603 | ) | | | | | (1,603 | ) | (15 | ) | (1,618 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | (685 | ) | | (685 | ) | | (685 | ) | | (685 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | (1,785 | ) | (1,785 | ) | | (1,785 | ) | | (1,785 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (24 | ) | (24 | ) | | (24 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (25 | ) | (25 | ) | | (25 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 3,243 | 3,243 | | 3,243 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 2 | 2 | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (1,603 | ) | (685 | ) | (1,785 | ) | (2,470 | ) | 26,647 | 22,574 | 292 | 22,866 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (5,441 | ) | (5,441 | ) | (469 | ) | (5,910 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (6,923 | ) | (6,923 | ) | | (6,923 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
83 | | | | | 247 | 473 | | 473 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 73 | 73 | | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | 76 | 76 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(20,971 | ) | 3,525 | | (695 | ) | (695 | ) | 103,787 | 129,302 | 1,105 | 130,407 |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 157 |
31. Capital and reserves continued
Share capital
The balance on the share capital account represents the aggregate nominal value of all ordinary and preference shares in issue, including treasury shares.
Share premium account
The balance on the share premium account represents the amounts received in excess of the nominal value of the ordinary and preference shares.
Capital redemption reserve
The balance on the capital redemption reserve represents the aggregate nominal value of all the ordinary shares repurchased and cancelled.
Merger reserve
The balance on the merger reserve represents the fair value of the consideration given in excess of the nominal value of the ordinary shares issued in an acquisition made by the issue of shares.
Treasury shares
Treasury shares represent BP shares repurchased and available for specific and limited purposes.
For accounting purposes shares held in Employee Share Ownership Plans (ESOPs) to meet the future requirements of the employee share-based payment plans are treated in the same manner as treasury shares and are therefore included in the financial statements as treasury shares. The ESOPs are funded by the group and have waived their rights to dividends in respect of such shares held for future awards. Until such time as the shares held by the ESOPs vest unconditionally to employees, the amount paid for those shares is shown as a reduction in shareholders equity. Assets and liabilities of the ESOPs are recognized as assets and liabilities of the group.
Foreign currency translation reserve
The foreign currency translation reserve records exchange differences arising from the translation of the financial statements of foreign operations. Upon disposal of foreign operations, the related accumulated exchange differences are recycled to the income statement.
Available-for-sale investments
This reserve records the changes in fair value of available-for-sale investments except for impairment losses, foreign exchange gains or losses, or changes arising from revised estimates of future cash flows. On disposal or impairment of the investments, the cumulative changes in fair value are recycled to the income statement.
Cash flow hedges
This reserve records the portion of the gain or loss on a hedging instrument in a cash flow hedge that is determined to be an effective hedge. For further information see Note 1 - Derivative financial instruments and hedging activities.
Profit and loss account
The balance held on this reserve is the accumulated retained profits of the group.
158 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
31. Capital and reserves continued
The pre-tax amounts of each component of other comprehensive income, and the related amounts of tax, are shown in the table below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||
Pre-tax | Tax | Net of tax | ||||||||||||
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences (including recycling) |
(4,096 | ) | 197 | (3,899 | ) | |||||||||
Available-for-sale investments (including recycling) |
1 | | 1 | |||||||||||
Cash flow hedges (including recycling) |
93 | (20 | ) | 73 | ||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
(814 | ) | | (814 | ) | |||||||||
Other |
| 80 | 80 | |||||||||||
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||
Remeasurements of the net pension and other post-retirement benefit liability or asset |
4,139 | (1,397 | ) | 2,742 | ||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
(1 | ) | | (1 | ) | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
(678 | ) | (1,140 | ) | (1,818 | ) | ||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||
Pre-tax | Tax | Net of tax | ||||||||||||
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences (including recycling) |
(6,787 | ) | (178 | ) | (6,965 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flow hedges (including recycling) |
(239 | ) | 36 | (203 | ) | |||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
(2,584 | ) | | (2,584 | ) | |||||||||
Other |
| 289 | 289 | |||||||||||
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||
Remeasurements of the net pension and other post-retirement benefit liability or asset |
(4,590 | ) | 1,334 | (3,256 | ) | |||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
4 | | 4 | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
(14,196 | ) | 1,481 | (12,715 | ) | |||||||||
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2013 | ||||||||||||||
Pre-tax | Tax | Net of tax | ||||||||||||
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||
Currency translation differences (including recycling) |
(1,586 | ) | (32 | ) | (1,618 | ) | ||||||||
Available-for-sale investments (including recycling) |
(695 | ) | 10 | (685 | ) | |||||||||
Cash flow hedges (including recycling) |
(1,979 | ) | 194 | (1,785 | ) | |||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
(24 | ) | | (24 | ) | |||||||||
Other |
| (25 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||||
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss |
||||||||||||||
Remeasurements of the net pension and other post-retirement benefit liability or asset |
4,764 | (1,521 | ) | 3,243 | ||||||||||
Share of items relating to equity-accounted entities, net of tax |
2 | | 2 | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
482 | (1,374 | ) | (892 | ) |
Contingent liabilities related to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill
Details of contingent liabilities related to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill are set out in Note 2.
Contingent liabilities not related to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill
There were contingent liabilities at 31 December 2015 in respect of guarantees and indemnities entered into as part of the ordinary course of the groups business. No material losses are likely to arise from such contingent liabilities. Further information is included in Note 28.
In the normal course of the groups business, legal proceedings are pending or may be brought against BP group entities arising out of current and past operations, including matters related to commercial disputes, product liability, antitrust, commodities trading, premises-liability claims, consumer protection, general environmental claims and allegations of exposures of third parties to toxic substances, such as lead pigment in paint, asbestos and other chemicals. BP believes that the impact of these legal proceedings on the groups results of operations, liquidity or financial position will not be material.
With respect to lead pigment in paint in particular, Atlantic Richfield, a subsidiary of BP, has been named as a co-defendant in numerous lawsuits brought in the US alleging injury to persons and property. Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of the legal proceedings, Atlantic Richfield believes it has valid defences that render the incurrence of a liability remote; however, the amounts claimed and the costs of implementing the remedies sought in the various cases could be substantial. The majority of the lawsuits have been abandoned or dismissed against Atlantic Richfield. No lawsuit against Atlantic Richfield has been settled nor has Atlantic Richfield been subject to a final adverse judgment in any proceeding. Atlantic Richfield intends to defend such actions vigorously.
The group files tax returns in many jurisdictions throughout the world. Various tax authorities are currently examining the groups tax returns. Tax returns contain matters that could be subject to differing interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations and the resolution of tax positions through negotiations with relevant tax authorities, or through litigation, can take several years to complete. While it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome in some cases, the group does not anticipate that there will be any material impact upon the groups results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 159 |
32. Contingent liabilities continued
The group is subject to numerous national and local environmental laws and regulations concerning its products, operations and other activities. These laws and regulations may require the group to take future action to remediate the effects on the environment of prior disposal or release of chemicals or petroleum substances by the group or other parties. Such contingencies may exist for various sites including refineries, chemical plants, oil fields, service stations, terminals and waste disposal sites. In addition, the group may have obligations relating to prior asset sales or closed facilities. The ultimate requirement for remediation and its cost are inherently difficult to estimate. However, the estimated cost of known environmental obligations has been provided in these accounts in accordance with the groups accounting policies. While the amounts of future costs that are not provided for could be significant and could be material to the groups results of operations in the period in which they are recognized, it is not possible to estimate the amounts involved. BP does not expect these costs to have a material effect on the groups financial position or liquidity.
If oil and natural gas production facilities and pipelines are sold to third parties and the subsequent owner is unable to meet their decommissioning obligations it is possible that, in certain circumstances, BP could be partially or wholly responsible for decommissioning. Furthermore, as described in Provisions, contingencies and reimbursement assets within Note 1, decommissioning provisions associated with downstream and petrochemical facilities are not generally recognized as the potential obligations cannot be measured given their indeterminate settlement dates.
The group generally restricts its purchase of insurance to situations where this is required for legal or contractual reasons. Typically, losses will therefore be borne as they arise rather than being spread over time through insurance premiums. Some risks are insured with third parties and reinsured through group insurance companies. The position is reviewed periodically.
33. Remuneration of senior management and non-executive directors
Remuneration of directors
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Total for all directors |
||||||||||||||
Emoluments |
10 | 14 | 16 | |||||||||||
Amounts awarded under incentive schemes a |
14 | 10 | 2 | |||||||||||
Total |
24 | 24 | 18 |
a | Excludes amounts relating to past directors. |
Emoluments
These amounts comprise fees paid to the non-executive chairman and the non-executive directors and, for executive directors, salary and benefits earned during the relevant financial year, plus cash bonuses awarded for the year.
Pension contributions
During 2015 one executive director participated in a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan established for UK employees by a separate trust fund to which contributions are made by BP based on actuarial advice. One executive director participated in 2015 in a US defined benefit pension plan and retirement savings plans established for US employees.
Further information
Full details of individual directors remuneration are given in the Directors remuneration report on page 76.
Remuneration of directors and senior management
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Total for senior management and non-executive directors |
||||||||||||||
Short-term employee benefits |
33 | 34 | 36 | |||||||||||
Pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
4 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||
Share-based payments |
36 | 34 | 43 | |||||||||||
Total |
73 | 71 | 82 |
Senior management comprises members of the executive team, see pages 60-61 for further information.
Short-term employee benefits
These amounts comprise fees and benefits paid to the non-executive chairman and non-executive directors, as well as salary, benefits and cash bonuses for senior management. Deferred annual bonus awards, to be settled in shares, are included in share-based payments. There was no compensation for loss of office included in Short-term employee benefits in 2015 (2014 $1.5 million and 2013 $3 million).
Pensions and other post-retirement benefits
The amounts represent the estimated cost to the group of providing pensions and other post-retirement benefits to senior management in respect of the current year of service measured in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits.
Share-based payments
This is the cost to the group of senior managements participation in share-based payment plans, as measured by the fair value of options and shares granted, accounted for in accordance with IFRS 2 Share-based Payments.
160 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
34. Employee costs and numbers
$ million | ||||||||||||||
Employee costs | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||
Wages and salaries a |
9,556 | 10,710 | 10,161 | |||||||||||
Social security costs |
879 | 983 | 958 | |||||||||||
Share-based payments b |
833 | 689 | 719 | |||||||||||
Pension and other post-retirement benefit costs |
1,660 | 1,554 | 1,816 | |||||||||||
12,928 | 13,936 | 13,654 |
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average number of employees c | US | Non-US | Total | US | Non-US | Total | US | Non-US | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upstream |
7,900 | 15,100 | 23,000 | 9,100 | 15,600 | 24,700 | 9,400 | 15,100 | 24,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Downstream d e |
7,800 | 38,200 | 46,000 | 8,200 | 39,900 | 48,100 | 9,300 | 39,800 | 49,100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other businesses and corporate e f g |
1,700 | 11,900 | 13,600 | 1,800 | 10,100 | 11,900 | 2,000 | 9,000 | 11,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17,400 | 65,200 | 82,600 | 19,100 | 65,600 | 84,700 | 20,700 | 63,900 | 84,600 |
a | Includes termination payments of $857 million (2014 $527 million and 2013 $212 million). |
b | The group provides certain employees with shares and share options as part of their remuneration packages. The majority of these share-based payment arrangements are equity-settled. |
c | Reported to the nearest 100. |
d | Includes 15,000 (2014 14,200 and 2013 14,100) service station staff. |
e | Around 2,000 employees from the global business services organization were reallocated from Downstream to Other businesses and corporate during 2015. |
f | Includes 5,600 (2014 5,100 and 2013 4,300) agricultural, operational and seasonal workers in Brazil. |
g | Includes employees of the Gulf Coast Restoration Organization. |
$ million | ||||||||||||||
Fees Ernst & Young | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |||||||||||
The audit of the company annual accounts a |
27 | 27 | 26 | |||||||||||
The audit of accounts of subsidiaries of the company |
13 | 13 | 13 | |||||||||||
Total audit |
40 | 40 | 39 | |||||||||||
Audit-related assurance services b |
7 | 7 | 8 | |||||||||||
Total audit and audit-related assurance services |
47 | 47 | 47 | |||||||||||
Taxation compliance services |
1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Taxation advisory services |
| 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
Services relating to corporate finance transactions |
1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||||||
Total non-audit and other assurance services |
1 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||
Total non-audit or non-audit-related assurance services |
3 | 5 | 5 | |||||||||||
Services relating to BP pension plans c |
1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
51 | 53 | 53 |
a | Fees in respect of the audit of the accounts of BP p.l.c. including the groups consolidated financial statements. |
b | Includes interim reviews and reporting on internal financial controls and non-statutory audit services. |
c | The pension plan services include tax compliance service of $0.4 million (2014 $0.4 million and 2013 $0.2 million) |
2015 includes $2 million of additional fees for 2014 and 2014 includes $2 million of additional fees for 2013. Auditors remuneration is included in the income statement within distribution and administration expenses.
The tax services relate to income tax and indirect tax compliance, employee tax services and tax advisory services.
The audit committee has established pre-approval policies and procedures for the engagement of Ernst & Young to render audit and certain assurance and tax services. The audit fees payable to Ernst & Young are reviewed by the audit committee in the context of other global companies for cost-effectiveness. Ernst & Young performed further assurance and tax services that were not prohibited by regulatory or other professional requirements and were pre-approved by the Committee. Ernst & Young is engaged for these services when its expertise and experience of BP are important. Most of this work is of an audit nature. Tax services were awarded either through a full competitive tender process or following an assessment of the expertise of Ernst & Young compared with that of other potential service providers. These services are for a fixed term.
Under SEC regulations, the remuneration of the auditor of $51 million (2014 $53 million and 2013 $53 million) is required to be presented as follows: audit $40 million (2014 $40 million and 2013 $39 million); other audit-related $7 million (2014 $7 million and 2013 $8 million); tax $1 million (2014 $2 million and 2013 $2 million); and all other fees $3 million (2014 $4 million and 2013 $4 million).
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 161 |
36. Subsidiaries, joint arrangements and associates
The more important subsidiaries and associates of the group at 31 December 2015 and the group percentage of ordinary share capital (to nearest whole number) are set out below. There are no individually significant joint arrangements. Those held directly by the parent company are marked with an asterisk (*), the percentage owned being that of the group unless otherwise indicated. A complete list of undertakings of the group is included in Note 15 in the parent company financial statements of BP p.l.c. which are filed with the Registrar of Companies in the UK, along with the groups annual report.
Subsidiaries | % |
Country of
incorporation |
Principal activities | |||||||||||
International |
||||||||||||||
*BP Corporate Holdings |
100 | England & Wales | Investment holding | |||||||||||
BP Exploration Operating Company |
100 | England & Wales | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
*BP Global Investments |
100 | England & Wales | Investment holding | |||||||||||
*BP International |
100 | England & Wales | Integrated oil operations | |||||||||||
BP Oil International |
100 | England & Wales | Integrated oil operations | |||||||||||
*Burmah Castrol |
100 | Scotland | Lubricants | |||||||||||
Algeria |
||||||||||||||
BP Amoco Exploration (In Amenas) |
100 | Scotland | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
Angola |
||||||||||||||
BP Exploration (Angola) |
100 | England & Wales | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
Australia |
||||||||||||||
BP Australia Capital Markets |
100 | Australia | Finance | |||||||||||
BP Finance Australia |
100 | Australia | Finance | |||||||||||
Azerbaijan |
||||||||||||||
BP Exploration (Caspian Sea) |
100 | England & Wales | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
BP Exploration (Azerbaijan) |
100 | England & Wales | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
Canada |
||||||||||||||
*BP Holdings Canada |
100 | England & Wales | Investment holding | |||||||||||
Egypt |
||||||||||||||
BP Exploration (Delta) |
100 | England & Wales | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
Germany |
||||||||||||||
BP Europa SE |
100 | England & Wales | Refining and marketing | |||||||||||
India |
||||||||||||||
BP Exploration (Alpha) |
100 | England & Wales | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
Trinidad & Tobago |
||||||||||||||
BP Trinidad and Tobago |
70 | US | Exploration and production | |||||||||||
UK |
||||||||||||||
BP Capital Markets |
100 | England & Wales | Finance | |||||||||||
US |
||||||||||||||
*BP Holdings North America |
100 | England & Wales | Investment holding | |||||||||||
Atlantic Richfield Company |
100 | US |
Exploration and production, refining and marketing
pipelines and petrochemicals |
|||||||||||
BP America |
100 | US | ||||||||||||
BP America Production Company |
100 | US | ||||||||||||
BP Company North America |
100 | US | ||||||||||||
BP Corporation North America |
100 | US | ||||||||||||
BP Exploration & Production |
100 | US | ||||||||||||
BP Exploration (Alaska) |
100 | US | ||||||||||||
BP Products North America |
100 | US | ||||||||||||
Standard Oil Company |
100 | US | ||||||||||||
BP Capital Markets America |
100 | US | Finance |
Associates | % |
Country of
incorporation |
Principal activities | |||||||||||
Russia |
||||||||||||||
Rosneft |
20 | Russia | Integrated oil operations |
162 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
37. Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries
BP p.l.c. fully and unconditionally guarantees the payment obligations of its 100%-owned subsidiary BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. under the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. The following financial information for BP p.l.c., BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. and all other subsidiaries on a condensed consolidating basis is intended to provide investors with meaningful and comparable financial information about BP p.l.c. and its subsidiary issuers of registered securities and is provided pursuant to Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X in lieu of the separate financial statements of each subsidiary issuer of public debt securities. Non-current assets for BP p.l.c. includes investments in subsidiaries recorded under the equity method for the purposes of the condensed consolidating financial information. Equity-accounted income of subsidiaries is the groups share of profit related to such investments. The eliminations and reclassifications column includes the necessary amounts to eliminate the intercompany balances and transactions between BP p.l.c., BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. and other subsidiaries. The financial information presented in the following tables for BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. incorporates subsidiaries of BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. using the equity method of accounting and excludes the BP groups midstream operations in Alaska that are reported through different legal entities and that are included within the other subsidiaries column in these tables. BP p.l.c. also fully and unconditionally guarantees securities issued by BP Capital Markets p.l.c. and BP Capital Markets America Inc. These companies are 100%-owned finance subsidiaries of BP p.l.c.
Income statement
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. |
Other
subsidiaries |
Eliminations and
reclassifications |
BP group | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
3,438 | | 222,881 | (3,425 | ) | 222,894 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings from joint ventures after interest and tax |
| | (28 | ) | | (28 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Earnings from associates after interest and tax |
| | 1,839 | | 1,839 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted income of subsidiaries after interest and tax |
| (5,404 | ) | | 5,404 | | ||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
29 | 185 | 671 | (274 | ) | 611 | ||||||||||||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
| 31 | 666 | (31 | ) | 666 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other income |
3,467 | (5,188 | ) | 226,029 | 1,674 | 225,982 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchases |
1,432 | | 166,783 | (3,425 | ) | 164,790 | ||||||||||||||||
Production and manufacturing expenses |
1,360 | | 35,680 | | 37,040 | |||||||||||||||||
Production and similar taxes |
140 | | 896 | | 1,036 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
569 | | 14,650 | | 15,219 | |||||||||||||||||
Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
215 | | 1,694 | | 1,909 | |||||||||||||||||
Exploration expense |
| | 2,353 | | 2,353 | |||||||||||||||||
Distribution and administration expenses |
56 | 1,125 | 10,449 | (77 | ) | 11,553 | ||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
(305 | ) | (6,313 | ) | (6,476 | ) | 5,176 | (7,918 | ) | |||||||||||||
Finance costs |
35 | 36 | 1,473 | (197 | ) | 1,347 | ||||||||||||||||
Net finance (income) expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
| 20 | 286 | | 306 | |||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
(340 | ) | (6,369 | ) | (8,235 | ) | 5,373 | (9,571 | ) | |||||||||||||
Taxation |
(146 | ) | 82 | (3,107 | ) | | (3,171 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
(194 | ) | (6,451 | ) | (5,128 | ) | 5,373 | (6,400 | ) | |||||||||||||
Attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders |
(194 | ) | (6,451 | ) | (5,210 | ) | 5,373 | (6,482 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
| | 82 | | 82 | |||||||||||||||||
(194 | ) | (6,451 | ) | (5,128 | ) | 5,373 | (6,400 | ) |
Statement of comprehensive income
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. |
Other
subsidiaries |
Eliminations and
reclassifications |
BP group | ||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
(194 | ) | (6,451 | ) | (5,128 | ) | 5,373 | (6,400 | ) | |||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| 1,863 | (3,681 | ) | | (1,818 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted other comprehensive income of subsidiaries |
| (3,640 | ) | | 3,640 | | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
(194 | ) | (8,228 | ) | (8,809 | ) | 9,013 | (8,218 | ) | |||||||||||||
Attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders |
(194 | ) | (8,228 | ) | (8,850 | ) | 9,013 | (8,259 | ) | |||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
| | 41 | | 41 | |||||||||||||||||
(194 | ) | (8,228 | ) | (8,809 | ) | 9,013 | (8,218 | ) |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 163 |
37. Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries continued
Income statement continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. |
Other
subsidiaries |
Eliminations and
reclassifications |
BP group | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
6,227 | | 353,529 | (6,188 | ) | 353,568 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings from joint ventures after interest and tax |
| | 570 | | 570 | |||||||||||||||||
Earnings from associates after interest and tax |
| | 2,802 | | 2,802 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted income of subsidiaries after interest and tax |
| 4,531 | | (4,531 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
2 | 193 | 910 | (262 | ) | 843 | ||||||||||||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
19 | | 876 | | 895 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other income |
6,248 | 4,724 | 358,687 | (10,981 | ) | 358,678 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchases |
2,375 | | 285,720 | (6,188 | ) | 281,907 | ||||||||||||||||
Production and manufacturing expenses |
1,779 | | 25,596 | | 27,375 | |||||||||||||||||
Production and similar taxes |
554 | | 2,404 | | 2,958 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
545 | | 14,618 | | 15,163 | |||||||||||||||||
Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
153 | | 8,812 | | 8,965 | |||||||||||||||||
Exploration expense |
| | 3,632 | | 3,632 | |||||||||||||||||
Distribution and administration expenses |
48 | 929 | 11,364 | (75 | ) | 12,266 | ||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
794 | 3,795 | 6,541 | (4,718 | ) | 6,412 | ||||||||||||||||
Finance costs |
57 | 23 | 1,255 | (187 | ) | 1,148 | ||||||||||||||||
Net finance (income) expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
| (50 | ) | 364 | | 314 | ||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
737 | 3,822 | 4,922 | (4,531 | ) | 4,950 | ||||||||||||||||
Taxation |
279 | 42 | 626 | | 947 | |||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
458 | 3,780 | 4,296 | (4,531 | ) | 4,003 | ||||||||||||||||
Attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders |
458 | 3,780 | 4,073 | (4,531 | ) | 3,780 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
| | 223 | | 223 | |||||||||||||||||
458 | 3,780 | 4,296 | (4,531 | ) | 4,003 |
Statement of comprehensive income continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. |
Other
subsidiaries |
Eliminations and
reclassifications |
BP group | ||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
458 | 3,780 | 4,296 | (4,531 | ) | 4,003 | ||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| (1,840 | ) | (10,875 | ) | | (12,715 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted other comprehensive income of subsidiaries |
| (10,843 | ) | | 10,843 | | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
458 | (8,903 | ) | (6,579 | ) | 6,312 | (8,712 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders |
458 | (8,903 | ) | (6,770 | ) | 6,312 | (8,903 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
| | 191 | | 191 | |||||||||||||||||
458 | (8,903 | ) | (6,579 | ) | 6,312 | (8,712 | ) |
164 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
37. Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries continued
Income statement continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. |
Other
subsidiaries |
Eliminations and
reclassifications |
BP group | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
5,397 | | 379,136 | (5,397 | ) | 379,136 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings from joint ventures after interest and tax |
| | 447 | | 447 | |||||||||||||||||
Earnings from associates after interest and tax |
| | 2,742 | | 2,742 | |||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted income of subsidiaries after interest and tax |
| 24,693 | | (24,693 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
7 | 118 | 841 | (189 | ) | 777 | ||||||||||||||||
Gains on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
| | 13,115 | | 13,115 | |||||||||||||||||
Total revenues and other income |
5,404 | 24,811 | 396,281 | (30,279 | ) | 396,217 | ||||||||||||||||
Purchases |
861 | | 302,887 | (5,397 | ) | 298,351 | ||||||||||||||||
Production and manufacturing expenses |
1,473 | | 26,054 | | 27,527 | |||||||||||||||||
Production and similar taxes |
1,010 | | 6,037 | | 7,047 | |||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
616 | | 12,894 | | 13,510 | |||||||||||||||||
Impairment and losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
(68 | ) | | 2,029 | | 1,961 | ||||||||||||||||
Exploration expense |
| | 3,441 | | 3,441 | |||||||||||||||||
Distribution and administration expenses |
108 | 1,234 | 11,269 | | 12,611 | |||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
1,404 | 23,577 | 31,670 | (24,882 | ) | 31,769 | ||||||||||||||||
Finance costs |
42 | 43 | 1,172 | (189 | ) | 1,068 | ||||||||||||||||
Net finance (income) expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
| 81 | 399 | | 480 | |||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
1,362 | 23,453 | 30,099 | (24,693 | ) | 30,221 | ||||||||||||||||
Taxation |
522 | 2 | 5,939 | | 6,463 | |||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
840 | 23,451 | 24,160 | (24,693 | ) | 23,758 | ||||||||||||||||
Attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders |
840 | 23,451 | 23,853 | (24,693 | ) | 23,451 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
| | 307 | | 307 | |||||||||||||||||
840 | 23,451 | 24,160 | (24,693 | ) | 23,758 |
Statement of comprehensive income continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. |
Other
subsidiaries |
Eliminations and
reclassifications |
BP group | ||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
840 | 23,451 | 24,160 | (24,693 | ) | 23,758 | ||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| 2,819 | (3,711 | ) | | (892 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted other comprehensive income of subsidiaries |
| (3,696 | ) | | 3,696 | | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
840 | 22,574 | 20,449 | (20,997 | ) | 22,866 | ||||||||||||||||
Attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders |
840 | 22,574 | 20,157 | (20,997 | ) | 22,574 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
| | 292 | | 292 | |||||||||||||||||
840 | 22,574 | 20,449 | (20,997 | ) | 22,866 |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 165 |
37. Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries continued
Balance sheet
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. |
Other
subsidiaries |
Eliminations and
reclassifications |
BP group | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
8,306 | | 121,452 | | 129,758 | |||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| | 11,627 | | 11,627 | |||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets |
539 | | 18,121 | | 18,660 | |||||||||||||||||
Investments in joint ventures |
| | 8,412 | | 8,412 | |||||||||||||||||
Investments in associates |
| 2 | 9,420 | | 9,422 | |||||||||||||||||
Other investments |
| | 1,002 | | 1,002 | |||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries equity-accounted basis |
| 128,234 | | (128,234 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed assets |
8,845 | 128,236 | 170,034 | (128,234 | ) | 178,881 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans |
3 | | 7,245 | (6,719 | ) | 529 | ||||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
| | 2,216 | | 2,216 | |||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
| | 4,409 | | 4,409 | |||||||||||||||||
Prepayments |
4 | | 999 | | 1,003 | |||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
| | 1,545 | | 1,545 | |||||||||||||||||
Defined benefit pension plan surpluses |
| 2,516 | 131 | | 2,647 | |||||||||||||||||
8,852 | 130,752 | 186,579 | (134,953 | ) | 191,230 | |||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
| | 272 | | 272 | |||||||||||||||||
Inventories |
246 | | 13,896 | | 14,142 | |||||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
9,718 | 1,062 | 22,393 | (10,850 | ) | 22,323 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
| | 4,242 | | 4,242 | |||||||||||||||||
Prepayments |
7 | | 1,831 | | 1,838 | |||||||||||||||||
Current tax receivable |
| | 599 | | 599 | |||||||||||||||||
Other investments |
| | 219 | | 219 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| | 26,389 | | 26,389 | |||||||||||||||||
9,971 | 1,062 | 69,841 | (10,850 | ) | 70,024 | |||||||||||||||||
Assets classified as held for sale |
| | 578 | | 578 | |||||||||||||||||
9,971 | 1,062 | 70,419 | (10,850 | ) | 70,602 | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
18,823 | 131,814 | 256,998 | (145,803 | ) | 261,832 | ||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables |
961 | 127 | 41,711 | (10,850 | ) | 31,949 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
| | 3,239 | | 3,239 | |||||||||||||||||
Accruals |
116 | 81 | 6,064 | | 6,261 | |||||||||||||||||
Finance debt |
| | 6,944 | | 6,944 | |||||||||||||||||
Current tax payable |
(21 | ) | 4 | 1,097 | | 1,080 | ||||||||||||||||
Provisions |
1 | | 5,153 | | 5,154 | |||||||||||||||||
1,057 | 212 | 64,208 | (10,850 | ) | 54,627 | |||||||||||||||||
Liabilities directly associated with assets classified as held for sale |
| | 97 | | 97 | |||||||||||||||||
1,057 | 212 | 64,305 | (10,850 | ) | 54,724 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other payables |
8 | 6,708 | 2,913 | (6,719 | ) | 2,910 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
| | 4,283 | | 4,283 | |||||||||||||||||
Accruals |
| 33 | 857 | | 890 | |||||||||||||||||
Finance debt |
| | 46,224 | | 46,224 | |||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
1,238 | 877 | 7,484 | | 9,599 | |||||||||||||||||
Provisions |
2,326 | | 33,634 | | 35,960 | |||||||||||||||||
Defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan deficits |
| 227 | 8,628 | | 8,855 | |||||||||||||||||
3,572 | 7,845 | 104,023 | (6,719 | ) | 108,721 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
4,629 | 8,057 | 168,328 | (17,569 | ) | 163,445 | ||||||||||||||||
Net assets |
14,194 | 123,757 | 88,670 | (128,234 | ) | 98,387 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders equity |
14,194 | 123,757 | 87,499 | (128,234 | ) | 97,216 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
| | 1,171 | | 1,171 | |||||||||||||||||
14,194 | 123,757 | 88,670 | (128,234 | ) | 98,387 |
166 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
37. Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries continued
Balance sheet continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. a |
Other
subsidiaries |
Eliminations and
reclassifications |
BP group | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-current assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
7,787 | | 122,905 | | 130,692 | |||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
| | 11,868 | | 11,868 | |||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets |
473 | | 20,434 | | 20,907 | |||||||||||||||||
Investments in joint ventures |
| | 8,753 | | 8,753 | |||||||||||||||||
Investments in associates |
| 2 | 10,401 | | 10,403 | |||||||||||||||||
Other investments |
| | 1,228 | | 1,228 | |||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries equity-accounted basis |
| 138,863 | | (138,863 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Fixed assets |
8,260 | 138,865 | 175,589 | (138,863 | ) | 183,851 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans |
7 | | 5,238 | (4,586 | ) | 659 | ||||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
| | 4,787 | | 4,787 | |||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
| | 4,442 | | 4,442 | |||||||||||||||||
Prepayments |
10 | | 954 | | 964 | |||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax assets |
| | 2,309 | | 2,309 | |||||||||||||||||
Defined benefit pension plan surpluses |
| 15 | 16 | | 31 | |||||||||||||||||
8,277 | 138,880 | 193,335 | (143,449 | ) | 197,043 | |||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
| | 333 | | 333 | |||||||||||||||||
Inventories |
338 | | 18,035 | | 18,373 | |||||||||||||||||
Trade and other receivables |
10,323 | 7,159 | 33,463 | (19,907 | ) | 31,038 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
| | 5,165 | | 5,165 | |||||||||||||||||
Prepayments |
31 | | 1,393 | | 1,424 | |||||||||||||||||
Current tax receivable |
| | 837 | | 837 | |||||||||||||||||
Other investments |
| | 329 | | 329 | |||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
| 31 | 29,732 | | 29,763 | |||||||||||||||||
10,692 | 7,190 | 89,287 | (19,907 | ) | 87,262 | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
18,969 | 146,070 | 282,622 | (163,356 | ) | 284,305 | ||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Trade and other payables |
905 | 168 | 56,644 | (17,599 | ) | 40,118 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
| | 3,689 | | 3,689 | |||||||||||||||||
Accruals |
134 | 391 | 6,577 | | 7,102 | |||||||||||||||||
Finance debt |
| | 6,877 | | 6,877 | |||||||||||||||||
Current tax payable |
328 | | 1,683 | | 2,011 | |||||||||||||||||
Provisions |
1 | | 3,817 | | 3,818 | |||||||||||||||||
1,368 | 559 | 79,287 | (17,599 | ) | 63,615 | |||||||||||||||||
Non-current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Other payables |
16 | 6,871 | 3,594 | (6,894 | ) | 3,587 | ||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments |
| | 3,199 | | 3,199 | |||||||||||||||||
Accruals |
| 90 | 771 | | 861 | |||||||||||||||||
Finance debt |
| | 45,977 | | 45,977 | |||||||||||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
1,232 | | 12,661 | | 13,893 | |||||||||||||||||
Provisions |
1,975 | | 27,105 | | 29,080 | |||||||||||||||||
Defined benefit pension plan and other post-retirement benefit plan deficits |
| 599 | 10,852 | | 11,451 | |||||||||||||||||
3,223 | 7,560 | 104,159 | (6,894 | ) | 108,048 | |||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities |
4,591 | 8,119 | 183,446 | (24,493 | ) | 171,663 | ||||||||||||||||
Net assets |
14,378 | 137,951 | 99,176 | (138,863 | ) | 112,642 | ||||||||||||||||
Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders equity |
14,378 | 137,951 | 97,975 | (138,863 | ) | 111,441 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-controlling interests |
| | 1,201 | | 1,201 | |||||||||||||||||
14,378 | 137,951 | 99,176 | (138,863 | ) | 112,642 |
a | For 2014 BP p.l.c. comparative balances there has been a reclassification from amounts due within one year to amounts due after one year. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 167 |
37. Condensed consolidating information on certain US subsidiaries continued
Cash flow statement
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. |
Other
subsidiaries |
BP group | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities | 925 | 6,628 | 11,580 | 19,133 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(925 | ) | | (16,375 | ) | (17,300 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
| (6,659 | ) | 2,124 | (4,535 | ) | ||||||||||||
Currency translation differences relating to cash and cash equivalents |
| | (672 | ) | (672 | ) | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
| (31 | ) | (3,343 | ) | (3,374 | ) | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
| 31 | 29,732 | 29,763 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
| | 26,389 | 26,389 |
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. a |
Other
subsidiaries |
BP group | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
92 | 10,464 | 22,198 | 32,754 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(92 | ) | | (19,482 | ) | (19,574 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
| (10,439 | ) | 5,173 | (5,266 | ) | ||||||||||||
Currency translation differences relating to cash and cash equivalents |
| | (671 | ) | (671 | ) | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
| 25 | 7,218 | 7,243 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
| 6 | 22,514 | 22,520 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
| 31 | 29,732 | 29,763 |
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||
For the year ended 31 December | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||
Issuer | Guarantor | |||||||||||||||||
BP
Exploration (Alaska) Inc. |
BP p.l.c. a |
Other
subsidiaries |
BP group | |||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
746 | 10,796 | 9,558 | 21,100 | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
(746 | ) | | (7,109 | ) | (7,855 | ) | |||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
| (10,799 | ) | 399 | (10,400 | ) | ||||||||||||
Currency translation differences relating to cash and cash equivalents |
| | 40 | 40 | ||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
| (3 | ) | 2,888 | 2,885 | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
| 9 | 19,626 | 19,635 | ||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
| 6 | 22,514 | 22,520 |
a | For 2014 and 2013 BP p.l.c. comparative information certain adjustments have been made to the amounts reported for operating, investing and financing activities, with no overall impact on net cash flow. |
168 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Supplementary information on oil and natural gas (unaudited) a
The regional analysis presented below is on a continent basis, with separate disclosure for countries that contain 15% or more of the total proved reserves (for subsidiaries plus equity-accounted entities), in accordance with SEC and FASB requirements.
Oil and gas reserves certain definitions
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the following terms have the meanings shown below:
Proved oil and gas reserves
Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically producible from a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulations prior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.
(i) | The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes: |
(A) | The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any; and |
(B) | Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data. |
(ii) | In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty. |
(iii) | Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty. |
(iv) | Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when: |
(A) | Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favourable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed programme in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or programme was based; and |
(B) | The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities. |
(v) | Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions. |
Undeveloped oil and gas reserves
Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.
(i) | Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances. |
(ii) | Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances, justify a longer time. |
(iii) | Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty. |
Developed oil and gas reserves
Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:
(i) | Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and |
(ii) | Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well. |
For details on BPs proved reserves and production compliance and governance processes, see pages 227-232.
a | 2013 equity-accounted entities information includes BPs share of TNK-BP from 1 January to 20 March, and Rosneft for the period 21 March to 31 December. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 169 |
Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized costs at 31 December a b |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross capitalized costs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties |
33,214 | 10,568 | 80,716 | 3,559 | 11,051 | 42,807 | | 28,474 | 5,177 | 215,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved properties |
437 | 168 | 5,602 | 2,377 | 2,964 | 4,635 | | 2,740 | 933 | 19,856 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33,651 | 10,736 | 86,318 | 5,936 | 14,015 | 47,442 | | 31,214 | 6,110 | 235,422 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
21,447 | 7,172 | 43,290 | 191 | 6,251 | 29,406 | | 15,967 | 2,677 | 126,401 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net capitalized costs |
12,204 | 3,564 | 43,028 | 5,745 | 7,764 | 18,036 | | 15,247 | 3,433 | 109,021 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs incurred for the year ended 31 December a b |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of properties |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
17 | | 131 | | | 259 | | | | 407 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved |
| | 56 | | (118 | ) | 8 | | | | (54 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17 | | 187 | | (118 | ) | 267 | | | | 353 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and appraisal costs c |
178 | 11 | 651 | 75 | 114 | 533 | 5 | 102 | 125 | 1,794 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
1,784 | 73 | 3,662 | 324 | 1,299 | 2,749 | | 3,439 | 128 | 13,458 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs |
1,979 | 84 | 4,500 | 399 | 1,295 | 3,549 | 5 | 3,541 | 253 | 15,605 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations for the year ended 31 December a |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues d |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third parties |
496 | 209 | 651 | 14 | 1,594 | 1,829 | | 800 | 1,450 | 7,043 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales between businesses |
1,149 | 718 | 7,427 | 2 | 33 | 4,005 | | 4,028 | 340 | 17,702 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,645 | 927 | 8,078 | 16 | 1,627 | 5,834 | | 4,828 | 1,790 | 24,745 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration expenditure |
115 | 8 | 960 | 108 | 51 | 1,001 | 5 | 53 | 52 | 2,353 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production costs |
879 | 313 | 2,777 | 77 | 703 | 1,521 | | 1,083 | 166 | 7,519 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production taxes |
(273 | ) | | 215 | | 214 | | | 834 | 46 | 1,036 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other costs (income) e |
(795 | ) | 92 | 2,460 | 48 | 140 | 358 | 27 | 76 | 215 | 2,621 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
949 | 544 | 3,671 | 13 | 673 | 3,412 | | 2,420 | 322 | 12,004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net impairments and (gains) losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
(390 | ) | 17 | 340 | | 101 | 846 | | 105 | 140 | 1,159 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
485 | 974 | 10,423 | 246 | 1,882 | 7,138 | 32 | 4,571 | 941 | 26,692 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation f |
1,160 | (47 | ) | (2,345 | ) | (230 | ) | (255 | ) | (1,304 | ) | (32 | ) | 257 | 849 | (1,947 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocable taxes g |
(930 | ) | 159 | (857 | ) | (5 | ) | (28 | ) | 694 | (5 | ) | (66 | ) | 472 | (566 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations |
2,090 | (206 | ) | (1,488 | ) | (225 | ) | (227 | ) | (1,998 | ) | (27 | ) | 323 | 377 | (1,381 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upstream and Rosneft segments replacement cost profit before interest and tax |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and production activities subsidiaries (as above) |
1,160 | (47 | ) | (2,345 | ) | (230 | ) | (255 | ) | (1,304 | ) | (32 | ) | 257 | 849 | (1,947 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream and other activities subsidiaries h |
401 | 110 | 43 | 10 | 211 | (39 | ) | (16 | ) | 67 | 14 | 801 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities i |
| (7 | ) | 19 | | 370 | (552 | ) | 1,326 | 363 | | 1,519 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total replacement cost profit before interest and tax |
1,561 | 56 | (2,283 | ) | (220 | ) | 326 | (1,895 | ) | 1,278 | 687 | 863 | 373 |
a | These tables contain information relating to oil and natural gas exploration and production activities of subsidiaries, which includes our share of oil and natural gas exploration and production activities of joint operations. They do not include any costs relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Amounts relating to the management and ownership of crude oil and natural gas pipelines, LNG liquefaction and transportation operations are excluded. In addition, our midstream activities of marketing and trading of natural gas, power and NGLs in the US, Canada, UK and Europe are excluded. The most significant midstream pipeline interests include the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, the Forties Pipeline System, the South Caucasus Pipeline and the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. Major LNG activities are located in Trinidad, Indonesia, Australia and Angola. |
b | Decommissioning assets are included in capitalized costs at 31 December but are excluded from costs incurred for the year. |
c | Includes exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures, which are capitalized within intangible assets, and geological and geophysical exploration costs, which are charged to income as incurred. |
d | Presented net of transportation costs, purchases and sales taxes. |
e | Includes property taxes, other government take and the fair value gain on embedded derivatives of $120 million. The UK region includes a $832 million gain which is offset by corresponding charges, primarily in the US region, relating to the group self-insurance programme. |
f | Excludes the unwinding of the discount on provisions and payables amounting to $164 million which is included in finance costs in the group income statement. |
g | UK region includes the one-off deferred tax impact of the enactment of legislation to reduce the UK supplementary charge tax rate applicable to profits arising in the North Sea from 32% to 20%. |
h | Midstream and other activities excludes inventory holding gains and losses. |
i | BPs share of the profits of equity-accounted entities are included after interest and tax reported by those entities. |
170 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of Europe |
US |
Rest of North America |
Russia a |
Rest of Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized costs at 31 December b c |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross capitalized costs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties |
| | | | 9,824 | | 12,728 | 3,486 | | 26,038 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved properties |
| | | | | | 437 | 26 | | 463 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 9,824 | | 13,165 | 3,512 | | 26,501 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
| | | | 4,117 | | 2,788 | 3,458 | | 10,363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net capitalized costs |
| | | | 5,707 | | 10,377 | 54 | | 16,138 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs incurred for the year ended 31 December b d e |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of properties c |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
| | | | | | 16 | | | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved |
| | | | | | 26 | | | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | 42 | | | 42 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and appraisal costs d |
| | | | 8 | | 123 | 1 | | 132 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
| | | | 1,128 | | 1,702 | 443 | | 3,273 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs |
| | | | 1,136 | | 1,867 | 444 | | 3,447 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations for the year ended 31 December b |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues f |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third parties |
| | | | 2,060 | | | 1,022 | | 3,082 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales between businesses |
| | | | | | 8,592 | 19 | | 8,611 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 2,060 | | 8,592 | 1,041 | | 11,693 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration expenditure |
| | | | 3 | | 52 | | | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production costs |
| | | | 647 | | 1,083 | 168 | | 1,898 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production taxes |
| | | | 425 | | 3,911 | 388 | | 4,724 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other costs (income) |
| | | | (381 | ) | | 284 | | | (97 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
| | | | 465 | | 992 | 484 | | 1,941 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net impairments and losses on sale of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
businesses and fixed assets |
| | | | 80 | | | 35 | | 115 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 1,239 | | 6,322 | 1,075 | | 8,636 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
| | | | 821 | | 2,270 | (34 | ) | | 3,057 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocable taxes |
| | | | 504 | | 449 | 1 | | 954 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations |
| | | | 317 | | 1,821 | (35 | ) | | 2,103 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upstream and Rosneft segments replacement cost profit before interest and tax from equity-accounted entities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and production activities equity-accounted entities after tax (as above) |
| | | | 317 | | 1,821 | (35 | ) | | 2,103 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream and other activities after tax g |
| (7 | ) | 19 | | 53 | (552 | ) | (495 | ) | 398 | | (584 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total replacement cost profit after interest and tax |
| (7 | ) | 19 | | 370 | (552 | ) | 1,326 | 363 | | 1,519 |
a | Amounts reported for Russia include BPs share of Rosnefts worldwide activities, including insignificant amounts outside Russia. |
b | These tables contain information relating to oil and natural gas exploration and production activities of equity-accounted entities. Amounts relating to the management and ownership of crude oil and natural gas pipelines, LNG liquefaction and transportation operations as well as downstream activities of Rosneft are excluded. The amounts reported for equity-accounted entities exclude the corresponding amounts for their equity-accounted entities. |
c | Decommissioning assets are included in capitalized costs at 31 December but are excluded from costs incurred for the year. |
d | Includes exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures, which are capitalized within intangible assets, and geological and geophysical exploration costs, which are charged to income as incurred. |
e | The amounts shown reflect BPs share of equity-accounted entities costs incurred, and not the costs incurred by BP in acquiring an interest in equity-accounted entities. |
f | Presented net of transportation costs and sales taxes. |
g | Includes interest and adjustment for non-controlling interests. Excludes inventory holding gains and losses. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 171 |
Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized costs at 31 December a b |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross capitalized costs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties |
31,496 | 10,578 | 76,476 | 3,205 | 9,796 | 39,020 | | 24,177 | 5,061 | 199,809 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved properties |
395 | 165 | 6,294 | 2,454 | 2,984 | 5,769 | | 2,773 | 888 | 21,722 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
31,891 | 10,743 | 82,770 | 5,659 | 12,780 | 44,789 | | 26,950 | 5,949 | 221,531 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
21,068 | 6,610 | 39,383 | 190 | 5,482 | 25,105 | | 13,501 | 2,215 | 113,554 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net capitalized costs |
10,823 | 4,133 | 43,387 | 5,469 | 7,298 | 19,684 | | 13,449 | 3,734 | 107,977 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs incurred for the year ended 31 December a b |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of properties |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
42 | | 6 | | | | | 557 | | 605 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved |
| | 346 | | 75 | 57 | | | | 478 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
42 | | 352 | | 75 | 57 | | 557 | | 1,083 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and appraisal costs c |
279 | 16 | 888 | 109 | 325 | 899 | | 194 | 201 | 2,911 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
2,067 | 293 | 4,792 | 706 | 983 | 2,881 | | 3,205 | 169 | 15,096 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs |
2,388 | 309 | 6,032 | 815 | 1,383 | 3,837 | | 3,956 | 370 | 19,090 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations for the year ended 31 December a d |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues e |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third parties |
529 | 77 | 1,218 | 4 | 2,802 | 2,536 | | 1,135 | 2,574 | 10,875 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales between businesses |
1,069 | 1,662 | 14,894 | 15 | 450 | 6,289 | | 6,951 | 624 | 31,954 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,598 | 1,739 | 16,112 | 19 | 3,252 | 8,825 | | 8,086 | 3,198 | 42,829 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration expenditure |
94 | 47 | 1,294 | 63 | 502 | 860 | | 712 | 60 | 3,632 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production costs |
979 | 436 | 3,492 | 34 | 783 | 1,542 | | 1,289 | 232 | 8,787 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production taxes |
(234 | ) | | 690 | | 175 | | | 2,234 | 93 | 2,958 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other costs (income) f |
(1,515 | ) | 77 | 3,260 | 55 | 284 | 120 | 57 | (69 | ) | 343 | 2,612 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
506 | 676 | 3,805 | 4 | 678 | 3,343 | | 2,461 | 255 | 11,728 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net impairments and (gains) losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
2,537 | 2,278 | (28 | ) | | 11 | 1,128 | | 391 | | 6,317 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,367 | 3,514 | 12,513 | 156 | 2,433 | 6,993 | 57 | 7,018 | 983 | 36,034 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation g |
(769 | ) | (1,775 | ) | 3,599 | (137 | ) | 819 | 1,832 | (57 | ) | 1,068 | 2,215 | 6,795 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocable taxes |
(1,383 | ) | (1,108 | ) | 1,269 | 15 | 865 | 1,216 | 3 | 67 | 1,161 | 2,105 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations |
614 | (667 | ) | 2,330 | (152 | ) | (46 | ) | 616 | (60 | ) | 1,001 | 1,054 | 4,690 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upstream and Rosneft segments replacement cost profit before interest and tax |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and production activities subsidiaries (as above) |
(769 | ) | (1,775 | ) | 3,599 | (137 | ) | 819 | 1,832 | (57 | ) | 1,068 | 2,215 | 6,795 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream and other activities subsidiaries h |
163 | 99 | 703 | 130 | 175 | (170 | ) | (26 | ) | (63 | ) | 14 | 1,025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities i |
| 62 | 23 | | 480 | (33 | ) | 2,125 | 557 | | 3,214 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total replacement cost profit before interest and tax |
(606 | ) | (1,614 | ) | 4,325 | (7 | ) | 1,474 | 1,629 | 2,042 | 1,562 | 2,229 | 11,034 |
a | These tables contain information relating to oil and natural gas exploration and production activities of subsidiaries, which includes our share of oil and natural gas exploration and production activities of joint operations. They do not include any costs relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Amounts relating to the management and ownership of crude oil and natural gas pipelines, LNG liquefaction and transportation operations are excluded. In addition, our midstream activities of marketing and trading of natural gas, power and NGLs in the US, Canada, UK and Europe are excluded. The most significant midstream pipeline interests include the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, the Forties Pipeline System, the Central Area Transmission System pipeline, the South Caucasus Pipeline and the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. Major LNG activities are located in Trinidad, Indonesia, Australia and Angola. |
b | Decommissioning assets are included in capitalized costs at 31 December but are excluded from costs incurred for the year. |
c | Includes exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures, which are capitalized within intangible assets, and geological and geophysical exploration costs, which are charged to income as incurred. |
d | Amendments have been made to previously published amounts for the Australasia region with no overall effect on total replacement cost profit before interest and tax. |
e | Presented net of transportation costs, purchases and sales taxes. |
f | Includes property taxes, other government take and the fair value gain on embedded derivatives of $430 million. The UK region includes a $1,016 million gain which is offset by corresponding charges, primarily in the US region, relating to the group self-insurance programme. |
g | Excludes the unwinding of the discount on provisions and payables amounting to $207 million which is included in finance costs in the group income statement. |
h | Midstream and other activities excludes inventory holding gains and losses. |
i | BPs share of the profits of equity-accounted entities are included after interest and tax reported by those entities. |
172 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia a |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized costs at 31 December b c |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross capitalized costs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties |
| | | | 8,719 | | 12,971 | 3,073 | | 24,763 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved properties |
| | | | 5 | | 376 | 25 | | 406 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 8,724 | | 13,347 | 3,098 | | 25,169 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
| | | | 3,652 | | 2,031 | 2,986 | | 8,669 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net capitalized costs |
| | | | 5,072 | | 11,316 | 112 | | 16,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs incurred for the year ended 31 December b c |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of properties d |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
| | | | | | (46 | ) | | | (46 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved |
| | | | | | 87 | | | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | 41 | | | 41 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and appraisal costs e |
| | | | 5 | | 128 | 4 | | 137 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development f |
| | | | 1,026 | | 1,913 | 326 | | 3,265 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs |
| | | | 1,031 | | 2,082 | 330 | | 3,443 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations for the year ended 31 December b |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third parties |
| | | | 2,472 | | | 1,257 | | 3,729 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales between businesses |
| | | | | | 10,972 | 19 | | 10,991 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 2,472 | | 10,972 | 1,276 | | 14,720 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration expenditure |
| | | | 4 | | 62 | 1 | | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production costs |
| | | | 567 | | 1,318 | 152 | | 2,037 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production taxes |
| | | | 721 | | 5,214 | 692 | | 6,627 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other costs (income) |
| | | | 4 | | 302 | | | 306 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
| | | | 370 | | 1,509 | 371 | | 2,250 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net impairments and losses on sale of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
businesses and fixed assets |
| | | | 25 | | | | | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 1,691 | | 8,405 | 1,216 | | 11,312 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
| | | | 781 | | 2,567 | 60 | | 3,408 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocable taxes |
| | | | 402 | | 637 | 29 | | 1,068 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations |
| | | | 379 | | 1,930 | 31 | | 2,340 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upstream and Rosneft segments replacement cost profit before interest and tax from equity-accounted entities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and production activities equity-accounted entities after tax (as above) |
| | | | 379 | | 1,930 | 31 | | 2,340 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream and other activities after tax h |
| 62 | 23 | | 101 | (33 | ) | 195 | 526 | | 874 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total replacement cost profit after interest and tax |
| 62 | 23 | | 480 | (33 | ) | 2,125 | 557 | | 3,214 |
a | Amounts reported for Russia include BPs share of Rosnefts worldwide activities, including insignificant amounts outside Russia. |
b | These tables contain information relating to oil and natural gas exploration and production activities of equity-accounted entities. Amounts relating to the management and ownership of crude oil and natural gas pipelines, LNG liquefaction and transportation operations as well as downstream activities of Rosneft are excluded. The amounts reported for equity-accounted entities exclude the corresponding amounts for their equity-accounted entities. |
c | The amounts shown reflect BPs share of equity-accounted entities costs incurred, and not the costs incurred by BP in acquiring an interest in equity-accounted entities. |
d | Decommissioning assets are included in capitalized costs at 31 December but are excluded from costs incurred for the year. |
e | Includes exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures, which are capitalized within intangible assets, and geological and geophysical exploration costs, which are charged to income as incurred. |
f | An amendment has been made to the amount previously disclosed for the Rest of Asia region. |
g | Presented net of transportation costs and sales taxes. |
h | Includes interest and adjustment for non-controlling interests. Excludes inventory holding gains and losses. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 173 |
Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized costs at 31 December a b |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross capitalized costs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties |
29,314 | 10,040 | 75,313 | 2,501 | 8,809 | 35,720 | | 20,726 | 4,681 | 187,104 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved properties |
316 | 195 | 6,816 | 2,408 | 3,366 | 5,079 | | 2,756 | 805 | 21,741 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29,630 | 10,235 | 82,129 | 4,909 | 12,175 | 40,799 | | 23,482 | 5,486 | 208,845 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
18,707 | 3,650 | 38,236 | 193 | 5,063 | 20,082 | | 10,069 | 1,962 | 97,962 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net capitalized costs |
10,923 | 6,585 | 43,893 | 4,716 | 7,112 | 20,717 | | 13,413 | 3,524 | 110,883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs incurred for the year ended 31 December a b |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of properties |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
| | 1 | | 7 | | | | | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved |
| | 158 | | 284 | 30 | | 7 | | 479 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 159 | | 291 | 30 | | 7 | | 487 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and appraisal costs c |
178 | 14 | 1,291 | 194 | 951 | 883 | | 1,090 | 210 | 4,811 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
1,942 | 455 | 4,877 | 569 | 683 | 2,755 | | 2,082 | 189 | 13,552 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs |
2,120 | 469 | 6,327 | 763 | 1,925 | 3,668 | | 3,179 | 399 | 18,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations for the year ended 31 December d |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues e |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third parties |
1,129 | 183 | 934 | 5 | 2,413 | 3,195 | | 1,005 | 2,466 | 11,330 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales between businesses |
1,661 | 1,280 | 14,047 | 12 | 1,154 | 6,518 | | 11,432 | 639 | 36,743 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,790 | 1,463 | 14,981 | 17 | 3,567 | 9,713 | | 12,437 | 3,105 | 48,073 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration expenditure |
280 | 17 | 437 | 28 | 1,477 | 387 | | 768 | 47 | 3,441 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production costs |
1,102 | 430 | 3,691 | 42 | 892 | 1,623 | | 1,091 | 187 | 9,058 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production taxes |
(35 | ) | | 1,112 | | 184 | | | 5,660 | 126 | 7,047 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other costs (income) f |
(1,731 | ) | 86 | 3,241 | 55 | 322 | 89 | 65 | 84 | 394 | 2,605 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
504 | 490 | 3,268 | | 559 | 3,132 | | 2,174 | 207 | 10,334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net impairments and (gains) losses on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
118 | 15 | (80 | ) | | 129 | 29 | | (16 | ) | 230 | 425 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
238 | 1,038 | 11,669 | 125 | 3,563 | 5,260 | 65 | 9,761 | 1,191 | 32,910 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation g |
2,552 | 425 | 3,312 | (108 | ) | 4 | 4,453 | (65 | ) | 2,676 | 1,914 | 15,163 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocable taxes |
554 | 475 | 1,204 | (26 | ) | 642 | 1,925 | (2 | ) | 682 | 845 | 6,299 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations |
1,998 | (50 | ) | 2,108 | (82 | ) | (638 | ) | 2,528 | (63 | ) | 1,994 | 1,069 | 8,864 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upstream, Rosneft and TNK-BP segments replacement cost profit before interest and tax d |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and production activities subsidiaries (as above) |
2,552 | 425 | 3,312 | (108 | ) | 4 | 4,453 | (65 | ) | 2,676 | 1,914 | 15,163 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream and other activities subsidiaries h |
244 | (40 | ) | 296 | (14 | ) | 153 | (154 | ) | (4 | ) | (29 | ) | 10 | 462 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TNK-BP gain on sale |
| | | | | | 12,500 | | | 12,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities i |
| 28 | 17 | | 405 | 24 | 2,158 | 553 | | 3,185 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total replacement cost profit before interest and tax |
2,796 | 413 | 3,625 | (122 | ) | 562 | 4,323 | 14,589 | 3,200 | 1,924 | 31,310 |
a | These tables contain information relating to oil and natural gas exploration and production activities of subsidiaries, which includes our share of oil and natural gas exploration and production activities of joint operations. They do not include any costs relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. Amounts relating to the management and ownership of crude oil and natural gas pipelines, LNG liquefaction and transportation operations are excluded. In addition, our midstream activities of marketing and trading of natural gas, power and NGLs in the US, Canada, UK and Europe are excluded. The most significant midstream pipeline interests include the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System, the Forties Pipeline System, the Central Area Transmission System pipeline, the South Caucasus Pipeline and the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan pipeline. Major LNG activities are located in Trinidad, Indonesia, Australia and Angola. |
b | Decommissioning assets are included in capitalized costs at 31 December but are excluded from costs incurred for the year. |
c | Includes exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures, which are capitalized within intangible assets, and geological and geophysical exploration costs, which are charged to income as incurred. |
d | Amendments have been made to previously published amounts for the Australasia region with no overall effect on total replacement cost before interest and tax. |
e | Presented net of transportation costs, purchases and sales taxes. |
f | Includes property taxes, other government take and the fair value gain on embedded derivatives of $459 million. The UK region includes a $1,055 million gain which is offset by corresponding charges, primarily in the US region, relating to the group self-insurance programme. |
g | Excludes the unwinding of the discount on provisions and payables amounting to $141 million which is included in finance costs in the group income statement. |
h | Midstream and other activities excludes inventory holding gains and losses. |
i | BPs share of the profits of equity-accounted entities are included after interest and tax reported by those entities. |
174 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Oil and natural gas exploration and production activities continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia a |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capitalized costs at 31 December b c |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross capitalized costs |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved properties |
| | | | 7,648 | | 18,942 | 4,239 | | 30,829 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved properties |
| | | | 29 | | 638 | 21 | | 688 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 7,677 | | 19,580 | 4,260 | | 31,517 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
| | | | 3,282 | | 1,077 | 4,061 | | 8,420 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net capitalized costs |
| | | | 4,395 | | 18,503 | 199 | | 23,097 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs incurred for the year ended 31 December b c d |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of properties |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved |
| | | | | | 1,816 | | | 1,816 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unproved |
| | | | | | 657 | | | 657 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | 2,473 | | | 2,473 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and appraisal costs e |
| | | | 8 | | 133 | 12 | | 153 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development f |
| | | | 714 | | 1,860 | 423 | | 2,997 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total costs |
| | | | 722 | | 4,466 | 435 | | 5,623 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations for the year ended 31 December b f |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Third parties |
| | | | 2,294 | | 435 | 4,591 | | 7,320 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales between businesses |
| | | | | | 9,679 | 14 | | 9,693 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 2,294 | | 10,114 | 4,605 | | 17,013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration expenditure |
| | | | | | 126 | 1 | | 127 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production costs |
| | | | 586 | | 1,177 | 382 | | 2,145 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production taxes |
| | | | 630 | | 4,511 | 3,383 | | 8,524 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other costs (income) |
| | | | 6 | | 94 | | | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
| | | | 317 | | 1,232 | 648 | | 2,197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net impairments and losses on sale of |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
businesses and fixed assets |
| | | | | | 37 | | | 37 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 1,539 | | 7,177 | 4,414 | | 13,130 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before taxation |
| | | | 755 | | 2,937 | 191 | | 3,883 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allocable taxes |
| | | | 460 | | 367 | 40 | | 867 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Results of operations |
| | | | 295 | | 2,570 | 151 | | 3,016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Upstream, Rosneft and TNK-BP segments replacement cost profit before interest and tax from equity-accounted entities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploration and production activities equity-accounted entities after tax (as above) |
| | | | 295 | | 2,570 | 151 | | 3,016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Midstream and other activities after tax h |
| 28 | 17 | | 110 | 24 | (412 | ) | 402 | | 169 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total replacement cost profit after interest and tax |
| 28 | 17 | | 405 | 24 | 2,158 | 553 | | 3,185 |
a | Amounts reported for Russia include BPs share of Rosnefts worldwide activities, including insignificant amounts outside Russia. |
b | These tables contain information relating to oil and natural gas exploration and production activities of equity-accounted entities. They do not include amounts relating to assets held for sale. Amounts relating to the management and ownership of crude oil and natural gas pipelines, LNG liquefaction and transportation operations as well as downstream activities of TNK-BP and Rosneft are excluded. The amounts reported for equity-accounted entities exclude the corresponding amounts for their equity-accounted entities. |
c | Decommissioning assets are included in capitalized costs at 31 December but are excluded from costs incurred for the year. |
d | The amounts shown reflect BPs share of equity-accounted entities costs incurred, and not the costs incurred by BP in acquiring an interest in equity-accounted entities. |
e | Includes exploration and appraisal drilling expenditures, which are capitalized within intangible assets, and geological and geophysical exploration costs, which are charged to income as incurred. |
f | Amendments have been made to previously published numbers for the Rest of Asia region. The amendments have no overall effect on results of operations. |
g | Presented net of transportation costs and sales taxes. |
h | Includes interest and adjustment for non-controlling interests. Excludes inventory holding gains and losses. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 175 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves
million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil a b | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US c |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
159 | 95 | 1,030 | 9 | 10 | 317 | | 384 | 40 | 2,044 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
329 | 22 | 664 | 163 | 22 | 120 | | 197 | 19 | 1,538 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
488 | 117 | 1,694 | 172 | 32 | 437 | | 581 | 59 | 3,582 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(23 | ) | 2 | (130 | ) | 39 | (2 | ) | 80 | | 295 | (2 | ) | 260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | 15 | | | 2 | | | | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
1 | | | | | 6 | | | | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | 3 | 42 | | 2 | | | | 47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production d |
(27 | ) | (14 | ) | (115 | ) | (1 | ) | (5 | ) | (98 | ) | | (87 | ) | (6 | ) | (353 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
(1 | ) | | | | | | | | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(48 | ) | (12 | ) | (227 | ) | 80 | (6 | ) | (8 | ) | | 208 | (8 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December e |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
141 | 86 | 890 | 46 | 8 | 340 | | 598 | 35 | 2,146 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
298 | 19 | 577 | 205 | 18 | 89 | | 192 | 16 | 1,414 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
440 | 106 | 1,467 | 252 | 26 | 429 | | 790 | 51 | 3,560 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) f |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 316 | 2 | 2,997 | 89 | | 3,405 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 314 | | 1,933 | 11 | | 2,258 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 630 | 2 | 4,930 | 101 | | 5,663 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | | 9 | | (23 | ) | 3 | | (11 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 3 | | | | | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | 28 | | | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 9 | | 185 | | | 194 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | (28 | ) | | (295 | ) | (35 | ) | | (358 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | (8 | ) | | (105 | ) | (32 | ) | | (146 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 311 | 2 | 2,844 | 68 | | 3,225 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 311 | | 1,981 | | | 2,292 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 622 | 2 | 4,825 | 68 | | 5,517 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
159 | 95 | 1,030 | 9 | 326 | 319 | 2,997 | 473 | 40 | 5,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
329 | 22 | 664 | 164 | 336 | 120 | 1,933 | 208 | 19 | 3,796 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
488 | 117 | 1,694 | 173 | 662 | 439 | 4,930 | 682 | 59 | 9,244 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
141 | 86 | 890 | 47 | 319 | 342 | 2,844 | 666 | 35 | 5,371 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
298 | 19 | 577 | 205 | 329 | 89 | 1,981 | 192 | 16 | 3,707 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
440 | 106 | 1,467 | 252 | 648 | 431 | 4,825 | 858 | 51 | 9,078 |
a | Crude oil includes condensate and bitumen. Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 23 million barrels upon which a net profits royalty will be payable over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
d | Includes 8 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
e | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
f | Includes 70 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 1.27% non-controlling interest in Rosneft, including 28 mmbbl held through BPs equity-accounted interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha. |
g | Total proved crude oil reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 4,823 million barrels, comprising less than 1 million barrels in Vietnam and Canada, 26 million barrels in Venezuela and 4,797 million barrels in Russia. |
176 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids a b | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
6 | 13 | 323 | | 11 | 5 | | | 6 | 364 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
3 | 1 | 104 | | 28 | 7 | | | 3 | 146 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 14 | 427 | | 39 | 12 | | | 10 | 510 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
2 | | (80 | ) | | | 6 | | | 3 | (69 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | 12 | | | | | | | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | 3 | | | | | | | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production c |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | (23 | ) | | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | | | (1 | ) | (34 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | (1 | ) | | | | | | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (2 | ) | (88 | ) | | (4 | ) | 3 | | | 2 | (88 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December d |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
5 | 11 | 269 | | 7 | 5 | | | 9 | 308 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
4 | 1 | 70 | | 28 | 10 | | | 2 | 115 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 12 | 339 | | 35 | 15 | | | 12 | 422 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) e |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | | 15 | 30 | | | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | | | 16 | | | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 15 | 46 | | | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | | | (3 | ) | 1 | | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (3 | ) | 1 | | | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December f |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | | 13 | 32 | | | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | | | 15 | | | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 13 | 47 | | | 60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
6 | 13 | 323 | | 11 | 20 | 30 | | 6 | 410 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
3 | 1 | 104 | | 28 | 7 | 16 | | 3 | 163 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 14 | 427 | | 39 | 27 | 46 | | 10 | 572 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
5 | 11 | 269 | | 7 | 18 | 32 | | 9 | 352 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
4 | 1 | 70 | | 28 | 10 | 15 | | 2 | 130 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10 | 12 | 339 | | 35 | 28 | 47 | | 12 | 482 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of less than 1 thousand barrels per day for subsidiaries and 4 thousand barrels per day for equity-accounted entities. |
d | Includes 11 million barrels of NGL in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
e | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
f | Total proved NGL reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 47 million barrels, comprising less than 1 million barrels in Venezuela, Vietnam and Canada, and 47 million barrels in Russia. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 177 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liquids a b | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US c |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
166 | 108 | 1,352 | 9 | 21 | 322 | | 384 | 46 | 2,407 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
332 | 23 | 769 | 163 | 50 | 127 | | 197 | 22 | 1,684 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
497 | 131 | 2,121 | 172 | 71 | 449 | | 581 | 68 | 4,092 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(20 | ) | 2 | (210 | ) | 39 | (2 | ) | 86 | | 295 | 1 | 191 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | 28 | | | 2 | | | | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
1 | | 3 | | | 6 | | | | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | 4 | 42 | | 2 | | | | 48 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production d |
(29 | ) | (16 | ) | (138 | ) | (1 | ) | (8 | ) | (101 | ) | | (87 | ) | (7 | ) | (387 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
(1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | | | | | | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(48 | ) | (14 | ) | (315 | ) | 80 | (10 | ) | (5 | ) | | 208 | (6 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December e |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
147 | 98 | 1,159 | 46 | 15 | 346 | | 598 | 45 | 2,453 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
302 | 20 | 647 | 205 | 46 | 99 | | 192 | 18 | 1,529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
449 | 117 | 1,806 | 252 | 61 | 444 | | 790 | 63 | 3,982 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) f |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 316 | 17 | 3,028 | 89 | | 3,451 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 314 | | 1,949 | 11 | | 2,274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 630 | 17 | 4,976 | 101 | | 5,725 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | | 9 | (3 | ) | (22 | ) | 3 | | (13 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 3 | | | | | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | 28 | | | 28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 9 | | 185 | | | 194 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | (28 | ) | | (295 | ) | (35 | ) | | (358 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | (1 | ) | (8 | ) | (3 | ) | (104 | ) | (32 | ) | | (147 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December g h |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 311 | 14 | 2,876 | 68 | | 3,270 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 312 | | 1,996 | | | 2,307 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 622 | 14 | 4,872 | 68 | | 5,577 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
166 | 108 | 1,352 | 9 | 337 | 339 | 3,028 | 473 | 46 | 5,858 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
332 | 23 | 769 | 164 | 364 | 127 | 1,949 | 208 | 22 | 3,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
497 | 131 | 2,121 | 173 | 701 | 466 | 4,976 | 682 | 68 | 9,817 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
147 | 98 | 1,159 | 47 | 326 | 360 | 2,876 | 666 | 45 | 5,723 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
302 | 20 | 647 | 205 | 357 | 99 | 1,996 | 192 | 18 | 3,836 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
449 | 117 | 1,806 | 252 | 684 | 459 | 4,872 | 858 | 63 | 9,560 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 23 million barrels of oil equivalent upon which a net profits royalty will be payable, over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
d | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of less than 1 thousand barrels per day for subsidiaries and 4 thousand barrels per day for equity-accounted entities. |
e | Also includes 19 million barrels in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
f | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
g | Includes 70 million barrels in respect of the non-controlling interest in Rosneft, including 28 mmboe held through BPs equity-accounted interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha. |
h | Total proved liquid reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 4,871 million barrels, comprising less than 1 million barrels in Canada, 26 million barrels in Venezuela, less than 1 million barrels in Vietnam and 4,844 million barrels in Russia. |
178 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
billion cubic feet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas a b | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
382 | 300 | 7,168 | 17 | 2,352 | 901 | | 1,688 | 3,316 | 16,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
386 | 19 | 2,447 | | 6,313 | 1,597 | | 3,892 | 1,719 | 16,372 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
768 | 318 | 9,615 | 17 | 8,666 | 2,497 | | 5,580 | 5,035 | 32,496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(12 | ) | 14 | (1,120 | ) | (13 | ) | 132 | 203 | | (165 | ) | 13 | (948 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
4 | | 432 | | | 7 | | | | 443 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | 65 | | 29 | 554 | | | | 648 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | 5 | | | 174 | | | | 179 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production c |
(65 | ) | (44 | ) | (628 | ) | (4 | ) | (709 | ) | (248 | ) | | (157 | ) | (297 | ) | (2,151 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
(5 | ) | | (6 | ) | | (58 | ) | (35 | ) | | | | (104 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(77 | ) | (30 | ) | (1,252 | ) | (17 | ) | (605 | ) | 654 | | (322 | ) | (284 | ) | (1,933 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December d |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
348 | 274 | 6,257 | | 2,071 | 847 | | 1,803 | 3,408 | 15,009 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
343 | 14 | 2,105 | | 5,989 | 2,305 | | 3,455 | 1,343 | 15,553 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
691 | 288 | 8,363 | | 8,060 | 3,152 | | 5,257 | 4,751 | 30,563 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) e |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | 1 | 1,228 | 400 | 4,674 | 60 | | 6,363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 717 | | 5,111 | 9 | | 5,837 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 1,945 | 400 | 9,785 | 69 | | 12,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | (1 | ) | 81 | (14 | ) | 1,604 | (2 | ) | | 1,669 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 8 | | | | | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | 5 | | | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 209 | | 175 | | | 384 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production c |
| | | | (182 | ) | | (430 | ) | (19 | ) | | (632 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | (1 | ) | | | | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | (1 | ) | 116 | (14 | ) | 1,354 | (21 | ) | | 1,434 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December f g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | 1 | 1,463 | 386 | 4,962 | 44 | | 6,856 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 598 | | 6,176 | 4 | | 6,778 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 2,061 | 386 | 11,139 | 48 | | 13,634 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
382 | 300 | 7,168 | 18 | 3,581 | 1,301 | 4,674 | 1,748 | 3,316 | 22,487 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
386 | 19 | 2,447 | 1 | 7,030 | 1,597 | 5,111 | 3,901 | 1,719 | 22,209 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
768 | 318 | 9,615 | 18 | 10,610 | 2,897 | 9,785 | 5,648 | 5,035 | 44,695 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
348 | 274 | 6,257 | 1 | 3,534 | 1,233 | 4,962 | 1,847 | 3,408 | 21,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
343 | 14 | 2,105 | | 6,587 | 2,305 | 6,176 | 3,459 | 1,343 | 22,331 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
691 | 288 | 8,363 | 1 | 10,121 | 3,538 | 11,139 | 5,305 | 4,751 | 44,197 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Includes 175 billion cubic feet of natural gas consumed in operations, 146 billion cubic feet in subsidiaries, 29 billion cubic feet in equity-accounted entities. |
d | Includes 2,359 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
e | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
f | Includes 129 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 0.23% non-controlling interest in Rosneft including 5 billion cubic feet held through BPs equity-accounted interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha. |
g | Total proved gas reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 11,169 billion cubic feet, comprising 1 billion cubic feet in Canada, 13 billion cubic feet in Venezuela, 22 billion cubic feet in Vietnam and 11,133 billion cubic feet in Russia. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 179 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels of oil equivalent c | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total hydrocarbons a b | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US d |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
232 | 160 | 2,588 | 12 | 426 | 477 | | 675 | 618 | 5,187 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
398 | 26 | 1,191 | 163 | 1,139 | 403 | | 868 | 319 | 4,507 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
630 | 186 | 3,779 | 175 | 1,565 | 880 | | 1,543 | 937 | 9,695 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(22 | ) | 4 | (403 | ) | 36 | 21 | 121 | | 267 | 4 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
1 | | 102 | | | 3 | | | | 106 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
1 | | 15 | | 5 | 102 | | | | 122 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | 4 | 42 | | 32 | | | | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production e f |
(40 | ) | (23 | ) | (247 | ) | (2 | ) | (130 | ) | (144 | ) | | (114 | ) | (58 | ) | (758 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
(1 | ) | | (2 | ) | | (10 | ) | (6 | ) | | | | (19 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(62 | ) | (19 | ) | (531 | ) | 77 | (114 | ) | 108 | | 153 | (55 | ) | (443 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
207 | 145 | 2,238 | 46 | 373 | 492 | | 909 | 632 | 5,041 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
362 | 22 | 1,010 | 205 | 1,078 | 496 | | 788 | 250 | 4,211 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
568 | 167 | 3,248 | 252 | 1,451 | 988 | | 1,696 | 882 | 9,252 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) h |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 528 | 86 | 3,834 | 100 | | 4,548 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 438 | | 2,830 | 13 | | 3,280 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 965 | 86 | 6,663 | 112 | | 7,828 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | (1 | ) | 23 | (5 | ) | 255 | 3 | | 274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 5 | | | | | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | 29 | | | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 45 | | 215 | | | 260 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production f |
| | | | (60 | ) | | (369 | ) | (39 | ) | | (467 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | (1 | ) | 12 | (5 | ) | 129 | (36 | ) | | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December i j |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 563 | 81 | 3,732 | 76 | | 4,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 415 | | 3,061 | 1 | | 3,476 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 978 | 81 | 6,792 | 77 | | 7,928 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
232 | 160 | 2,588 | 12 | 954 | 563 | 3,834 | 775 | 618 | 9,735 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
398 | 26 | 1,191 | 164 | 1,576 | 403 | 2,830 | 881 | 319 | 7,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
630 | 186 | 3,779 | 176 | 2,530 | 966 | 6,663 | 1,656 | 937 | 17,523 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
207 | 145 | 2,238 | 47 | 936 | 573 | 3,732 | 984 | 632 | 9,493 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
362 | 22 | 1,010 | 205 | 1,493 | 496 | 3,061 | 788 | 250 | 7,687 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
568 | 167 | 3,248 | 252 | 2,429 | 1,069 | 6,792 | 1,773 | 882 | 17,180 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | 5.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas = 1 million barrels of oil equivalent. |
d | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 23 million barrels of oil equivalent upon which a net profits royalty will be payable, over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
e | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of less than 1 thousand barrels per day for subsidiaries and 4 thousand barrels per day for equity-accounted entities. |
f | Includes 30 million barrels of oil equivalent of natural gas consumed in operations, 25 million barrels of oil equivalent in subsidiaries, 5 million barrels of oil equivalent in equity-accounted entities. |
g | Includes 425 million barrels of oil equivalent in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
h | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
i | Includes 70 million barrels of oil equivalent in respect of the non-controlling interest in Rosneft, including 28 mmboe held through BPs equity-accounted interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha. |
j | Total proved reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 6,796 million barrels of oil equivalent, comprising less than 1 million barrels of oil equivalent in Canada, 28 million barrels of oil equivalent in Venezuela, 4 million barrels of oil equivalent in Vietnam and 6,764 million barrels of oil equivalent in Russia. |
180 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil a b | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US c |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
160 | 147 | 1,007 | | 15 | 316 | | 320 | 49 | 2,013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
374 | 53 | 752 | 188 | 17 | 180 | | 202 | 19 | 1,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534 | 200 | 1,760 | 188 | 31 | 495 | | 522 | 69 | 3,798 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(41 | ) | (68 | ) | 87 | (16 | ) | 9 | 20 | | 96 | (2 | ) | 85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
2 | | 16 | | 1 | 3 | | | | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
5 | | | | | | | 12 | | 17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
5 | | | | 1 | | | 8 | | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production d |
(17 | ) | (15 | ) | (123 | ) | | (5 | ) | (81 | ) | | (57 | ) | (7 | ) | (305 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | (45 | ) | | (5 | ) | | | | | (50 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(46 | ) | (82 | ) | (66 | ) | (16 | ) | 1 | (58 | ) | | 59 | (9 | ) | (217 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December e |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
159 | 95 | 1,030 | 9 | 10 | 317 | | 384 | 40 | 2,044 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
329 | 22 | 664 | 163 | 22 | 120 | | 197 | 19 | 1,538 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
488 | 117 | 1,694 | 172 | 32 | 437 | | 581 | 59 | 3,581 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) f |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 316 | 2 | 2,970 | 120 | | 3,407 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 314 | 2 | 1,858 | 7 | | 2,182 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 630 | 4 | 4,828 | 127 | | 5,590 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | | 4 | (2 | ) | 213 | 9 | | 224 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 12 | | | | | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 10 | | 187 | | | 197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | (26 | ) | | (297 | ) | (36 | ) | | (359 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (2 | ) | 103 | (27 | ) | | 74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 316 | 2 | 2,997 | 89 | | 3,405 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 314 | | 1,933 | 11 | | 2,258 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 630 | 2 | 4,930 | 101 | | 5,663 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
160 | 147 | 1,007 | | 331 | 317 | 2,970 | 440 | 49 | 5,421 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
374 | 53 | 752 | 189 | 331 | 182 | 1,858 | 209 | 19 | 3,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534 | 200 | 1,760 | 189 | 661 | 499 | 4,828 | 649 | 69 | 9,388 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
159 | 95 | 1,030 | 9 | 326 | 319 | 2,997 | 473 | 40 | 5,448 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
329 | 22 | 664 | 164 | 336 | 120 | 1,933 | 208 | 19 | 3,796 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
488 | 117 | 1,694 | 173 | 662 | 439 | 4,930 | 682 | 59 | 9,244 |
a | Crude oil includes condensate and bitumen. Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 65 million barrels upon which a net profits royalty will be payable over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
d | Includes 10 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
e | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
f | Includes 38 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 0.15% non-controlling interest in Rosneft. |
g | Total proved crude oil reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 4,961 million barrels, comprising less than 1 million barrels in Vietnam and Canada, 30 million barrels in Venezuela and 4,930 million barrels in Russia. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 181 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids a b | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
9 | 16 | 290 | | 14 | 4 | | | 8 | 342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
6 | 2 | 155 | | 28 | 15 | | | 3 | 209 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 18 | 444 | | 43 | 20 | | | 10 | 551 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(6 | ) | (2 | ) | 15 | | | (6 | ) | | | | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | 13 | | | | | | | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production c |
(1 | ) | (2 | ) | (27 | ) | | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | | | (1 | ) | (36 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | (18 | ) | | | | | | | (18 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(6 | ) | (4 | ) | (17 | ) | | (4 | ) | (8 | ) | | | (1 | ) | (40 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December d |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
6 | 13 | 323 | | 11 | 5 | | | 6 | 364 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
3 | 1 | 104 | | 28 | 7 | | | 3 | 146 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 14 | 427 | | 39 | 12 | | | 10 | 510 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) e |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | | 8 | 94 | | | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | | 8 | 21 | | | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 16 | 115 | | | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | | | | (69 | ) | | | (69 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (1 | ) | (69 | ) | | | (69 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December f |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | | 15 | 30 | | | 46 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | | | 16 | | | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 15 | 46 | | | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
9 | 16 | 290 | | 14 | 13 | 94 | | 8 | 444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
6 | 2 | 155 | | 28 | 23 | 21 | | 3 | 238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 18 | 444 | | 43 | 36 | 115 | | 10 | 682 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
6 | 13 | 323 | | 11 | 20 | 30 | | 6 | 410 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
3 | 1 | 104 | | 28 | 7 | 16 | | 3 | 163 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
9 | 14 | 427 | | 39 | 27 | 46 | | 10 | 572 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of less than 1 thousand barrels per day for subsidiaries and 7 thousand barrels per day for equity-accounted entities. |
d | Includes 12 million barrels of NGL in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
e | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
f | Total proved NGL reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 47 million barrels, comprising less than 1 million barrels in Venezuela, Vietnam and Canada, and 46 million barrels in Russia. |
182 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liquids a b | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US c |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
169 | 163 | 1,297 | | 29 | 320 | | 320 | 57 | 2,354 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
380 | 55 | 907 | 188 | 46 | 195 | | 202 | 22 | 1,994 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549 | 217 | 2,204 | 188 | 74 | 515 | | 523 | 78 | 4,348 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(47 | ) | (70 | ) | 101 | (16 | ) | 9 | 14 | | 96 | (2 | ) | 86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
2 | | 28 | | 1 | 3 | | | | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
5 | | | | | | | 12 | | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
5 | | | | 1 | | | 8 | | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production d |
(17 | ) | (17 | ) | (150 | ) | | (9 | ) | (83 | ) | | (57 | ) | (8 | ) | (341 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | (63 | ) | | (5 | ) | | | | | (68 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(52 | ) | (86 | ) | (83 | ) | (16 | ) | (3 | ) | (66 | ) | | 59 | (10 | ) | (257 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December e |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
166 | 108 | 1,352 | 9 | 21 | 322 | | 384 | 46 | 2,407 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
332 | 23 | 769 | 163 | 50 | 127 | | 197 | 22 | 1,684 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
497 | 131 | 2,121 | 172 | 71 | 449 | | 581 | 68 | 4,092 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) f |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 316 | 10 | 3,063 | 120 | | 3,510 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 314 | 10 | 1,879 | 7 | | 2,210 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 630 | 20 | 4,943 | 127 | | 5,721 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | | 4 | (3 | ) | 144 | 9 | | 155 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 12 | | | | | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 10 | | 187 | | | 197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | (26 | ) | | (297 | ) | (36 | ) | | (359 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | (3 | ) | 34 | (27 | ) | | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December g h |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 316 | 17 | 3,028 | 89 | | 3,451 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 314 | | 1,949 | 11 | | 2,274 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 630 | 17 | 4,976 | 101 | | 5,725 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
169 | 163 | 1,297 | | 345 | 331 | 3,063 | 440 | 57 | 5,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
380 | 55 | 907 | 188 | 359 | 205 | 1,879 | 209 | 22 | 4,204 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549 | 217 | 2,204 | 189 | 704 | 535 | 4,943 | 650 | 78 | 10,069 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
166 | 108 | 1,352 | 9 | 337 | 339 | 3,028 | 473 | 46 | 5,858 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
332 | 23 | 769 | 164 | 364 | 127 | 1,949 | 208 | 22 | 3,958 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
497 | 131 | 2,121 | 173 | 701 | 466 | 4,976 | 682 | 68 | 9,817 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 65 million barrels of oil equivalent upon which a net profits royalty will be payable, over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
d | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of less than 1 thousand barrels per day for subsidiaries and 7 thousand barrels per day for equity-accounted entities. |
e | Also includes 21 million barrels in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
f | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
g | Includes 38 million barrels in respect of the non-controlling interest in Rosneft. |
h | Total proved liquid reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 5,007 million barrels, comprising 1 million barrels in Canada, 30 million barrels in Venezuela, less than 1 million barrels in Vietnam and 4,976 million barrels in Russia. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 183 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
billion cubic feet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas a b | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
643 | 364 | 7,122 | 10 | 3,109 | 961 | | 1,519 | 3,932 | 17,660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
314 | 39 | 2,825 | | 6,116 | 1,807 | | 3,671 | 1,755 | 16,527 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
957 | 403 | 9,947 | 10 | 9,225 | 2,768 | | 5,190 | 5,687 | 34,187 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(260 | ) | (46 | ) | (29 | ) | 11 | (258 | ) | (84 | ) | | (34 | ) | (351 | ) | (1,050 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
7 | | 582 | | 220 | 28 | | | | 838 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
1 | | 5 | | | | | 322 | | 328 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
94 | | 2 | | 271 | 4 | | 267 | | 637 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production c |
(30 | ) | (40 | ) | (625 | ) | (4 | ) | (792 | ) | (218 | ) | | (165 | ) | (302 | ) | (2,177 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | (266 | ) | | | | | | | (266 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(189 | ) | (85 | ) | (332 | ) | 7 | (559 | ) | (271 | ) | | 389 | (652 | ) | (1,691 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December d |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
382 | 300 | 7,168 | 17 | 2,352 | 901 | | 1,688 | 3,316 | 16,124 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
386 | 19 | 2,447 | | 6,313 | 1,597 | | 3,892 | 1,719 | 16,372 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
768 | 318 | 9,615 | 17 | 8,666 | 2,497 | | 5,580 | 5,035 | 32,496 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) e |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 1,364 | 230 | 4,171 | 72 | | 5,837 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 747 | 135 | 5,054 | 14 | | 5,951 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 2,111 | 365 | 9,225 | 86 | | 11,788 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | 1 | (87 | ) | 38 | 767 | 1 | | 720 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 23 | | | | | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 69 | | 183 | | | 252 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production c |
| | | | (172 | ) | (3 | ) | (390 | ) | (18 | ) | | (583 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | (166 | ) | 35 | 560 | (17 | ) | | 412 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December f g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | 1 | 1,228 | 400 | 4,674 | 60 | | 6,363 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 717 | | 5,111 | 9 | | 5,837 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 1,945 | 400 | 9,785 | 69 | | 12,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
643 | 364 | 7,122 | 10 | 4,473 | 1,191 | 4,171 | 1,591 | 3,932 | 23,497 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
314 | 39 | 2,825 | 1 | 6,863 | 1,942 | 5,054 | 3,685 | 1,755 | 22,478 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
957 | 403 | 9,947 | 11 | 11,336 | 3,133 | 9,225 | 5,276 | 5,687 | 45,975 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
382 | 300 | 7,168 | 18 | 3,581 | 1,301 | 4,674 | 1,748 | 3,316 | 22,487 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
386 | 19 | 2,447 | 1 | 7,030 | 1,597 | 5,111 | 3,901 | 1,719 | 22,209 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
768 | 318 | 9,615 | 18 | 10,610 | 2,897 | 9,785 | 5,648 | 5,035 | 44,695 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Includes 181 billion cubic feet of natural gas consumed in operations, 151 billion cubic feet in subsidiaries, 29 billion cubic feet in equity-accounted entities. |
d | Includes 2,519 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
e | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
f | Includes 91 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 0.18% non-controlling interest in Rosneft. |
g | Total proved gas reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 9,827 billion cubic feet, comprising 1 billion cubic feet in Canada, 14 billion cubic feet in Venezuela, 26 billion cubic feet in Vietnam and 9,785 billion cubic feet in Russia. |
184 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels of oil equivalent c | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total hydrocarbons a b | 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US d |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
280 | 225 | 2,525 | 2 | 564 | 486 | | 582 | 735 | 5,399 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
434 | 62 | 1,394 | 188 | 1,100 | 507 | | 835 | 324 | 4,844 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
714 | 287 | 3,919 | 190 | 1,664 | 993 | | 1,417 | 1,059 | 10,243 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(91 | ) | (78 | ) | 96 | (14 | ) | (36 | ) | (1 | ) | | 90 | (62 | ) | (96 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
3 | | 129 | | 39 | 8 | | | | 180 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
6 | | 1 | | | | | 68 | | 74 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
21 | | 1 | | 47 | 1 | | 54 | | 123 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production e f |
(23 | ) | (24 | ) | (258 | ) | (1 | ) | (146 | ) | (121 | ) | | (86 | ) | (60 | ) | (717 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | (109 | ) | | (5 | ) | | | | | (114 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(84 | ) | (101 | ) | (140 | ) | (14 | ) | (99 | ) | (113 | ) | | 126 | (122 | ) | (548 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
232 | 160 | 2,588 | 12 | 426 | 477 | | 675 | 618 | 5,187 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
398 | 26 | 1,191 | 163 | 1,139 | 403 | | 868 | 319 | 4,507 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
630 | 186 | 3,779 | 175 | 1,565 | 880 | | 1,543 | 937 | 9,694 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) h |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 552 | 50 | 3,782 | 133 | | 4,517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 442 | 33 | 2,751 | 9 | | 3,236 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 994 | 83 | 6,533 | 142 | | 7,753 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | | (11 | ) | 4 | 276 | 9 | | 278 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 16 | | | | | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 22 | | 219 | | | 241 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production f |
| | | | (56 | ) | (1 | ) | (365 | ) | (39 | ) | | (460 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | (29 | ) | 3 | 130 | (29 | ) | | 75 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December i j |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 528 | 86 | 3,834 | 100 | | 4,548 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 438 | | 2,830 | 13 | | 3,280 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 965 | 86 | 6,663 | 112 | | 7,828 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
280 | 225 | 2,525 | 2 | 1,116 | 536 | 3,782 | 715 | 735 | 9,916 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
434 | 62 | 1,394 | 189 | 1,542 | 540 | 2,751 | 844 | 324 | 8,080 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
714 | 287 | 3,919 | 191 | 2,658 | 1,076 | 6,533 | 1,559 | 1,059 | 17,996 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
232 | 160 | 2,588 | 12 | 954 | 563 | 3,834 | 775 | 618 | 9,735 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
398 | 26 | 1,191 | 164 | 1,576 | 403 | 2,830 | 881 | 319 | 7,788 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
630 | 186 | 3,779 | 176 | 2,530 | 966 | 6,663 | 1,656 | 937 | 17,523 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | 5.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas = 1 million barrels of oil equivalent. |
d | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 65 million barrels of oil equivalent upon which a net profits royalty will be payable, over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
e | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of less than 1 thousand barrels per day for subsidiaries and 7 thousand barrels per day for equity-accounted entities. |
f | Includes 31 million barrels of oil equivalent of natural gas consumed in operations, 26 million barrels of oil equivalent in subsidiaries, 5 million barrels of oil equivalent in equity-accounted entities. |
g | Includes 456 million barrels of oil equivalent in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
h | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
i | Includes 54 million barrels of oil equivalent in respect of the non-controlling interest in Rosneft. |
j | Total proved reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 6,702 million barrels of oil equivalent, comprising 1 million barrels of oil equivalent in Canada, 33 million barrels of oil equivalent in Venezuela, 5 million barrels of oil equivalent in Vietnam and 6,663 million barrels of oil equivalent in Russia. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 185 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil a b | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US c |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
228 | 153 | 1,127 | | 16 | 306 | | 268 | 45 | 2,143 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
426 | 73 | 818 | 195 | 20 | 236 | | 137 | 34 | 1,938 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
654 | 226 | 1,945 | 195 | 36 | 542 | | 405 | 79 | 4,081 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(79 | ) | (15 | ) | (111 | ) | (7 | ) | 1 | 30 | | 65 | (5 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
11 | | 33 | | 1 | 2 | | 65 | | 112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | 2 | | | | | 39 | 3 | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
(21 | ) | (11 | ) | (108 | ) | | (7 | ) | (79 | ) | | (52 | ) | (8 | ) | (285 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
(31 | ) | | (1 | ) | | | | | | | (32 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(120 | ) | (26 | ) | (185 | ) | (7 | ) | (5 | ) | (47 | ) | | 117 | (10 | ) | (283 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December d |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
160 | 147 | 1,007 | | 15 | 316 | | 320 | 49 | 2,013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
374 | 53 | 752 | 188 | 17 | 180 | | 202 | 19 | 1,785 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534 | 200 | 1,760 | 188 | 31 | 495 | | 522 | 69 | 3,798 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) e f |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 336 | 3 | 2,433 | 198 | | 2,970 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 347 | 2 | 1,943 | 13 | | 2,305 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 683 | 5 | 4,376 | 211 | | 5,275 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | 1 | (14 | ) | (1 | ) | 295 | 1 | | 281 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 27 | | | | | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | 34 | | 4,550 | | | 4,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 12 | | 228 | | | 240 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | (27 | ) | | (301 | ) | (85 | ) | | (412 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | (85 | ) | | (4,321 | ) | | | (4,406 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | (53 | ) | (1 | ) | 451 | (84 | ) | | 314 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 316 | 2 | 2,970 | 120 | | 3,407 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 314 | 2 | 1,858 | 7 | | 2,182 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 630 | 4 | 4,828 | 127 | | 5,590 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
228 | 153 | 1,127 | | 352 | 309 | 2,433 | 466 | 45 | 5,113 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
426 | 73 | 818 | 195 | 367 | 239 | 1,943 | 150 | 34 | 4,243 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
654 | 226 | 1,945 | 195 | 719 | 547 | 4,376 | 616 | 79 | 9,357 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
160 | 147 | 1,007 | | 331 | 317 | 2,970 | 440 | 49 | 5,421 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
374 | 53 | 752 | 189 | 331 | 182 | 1,858 | 209 | 19 | 3,965 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
534 | 200 | 1,760 | 189 | 661 | 499 | 4,828 | 649 | 69 | 9,388 |
a | Crude oil includes condensate and bitumen. Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 72 million barrels upon which a net profits royalty will be payable over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
d | Includes 8 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
e | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
f | Includes 23 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 0.47% non-controlling interest in Rosneft. |
g | Total proved crude oil reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 4,860 million barrels, comprising less than 1 million barrels in Vietnam and Canada, 32 million barrels in Venezuela and 4,827 million barrels in Russia. |
186 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids a b | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
14 | 17 | 316 | | 6 | 6 | | | 7 | 366 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
5 | 6 | 171 | | 12 | 19 | | | 11 | 225 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 23 | 487 | | 18 | 25 | | | 18 | 591 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
1 | (4 | ) | (30 | ) | | 29 | (4 | ) | | | (7 | ) | (15 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
1 | | 19 | | | | | | | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | 2 | | | | | | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production c |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (24 | ) | | (4 | ) | (1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
(5 | ) | | (10 | ) | | | | | | | (15 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(4 | ) | (5 | ) | (43 | ) | | 25 | (5 | ) | | | (8 | ) | (40 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December d |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
9 | 16 | 290 | | 14 | 4 | | | 8 | 342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
6 | 2 | 155 | | 28 | 15 | | | 3 | 209 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 18 | 444 | | 43 | 20 | | | 10 | 551 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) e |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 3 | 9 | 59 | | | 71 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 4 | 9 | 19 | | | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 7 | 18 | 78 | | | 103 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | | (7 | ) | (2 | ) | 89 | | | 81 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | 29 | | | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | | | (2 | ) | | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | (78 | ) | | | (78 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | (7 | ) | (2 | ) | 38 | | | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December f |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | | 8 | 94 | | | 103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | | 8 | 21 | | | 29 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 16 | 115 | | | 131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
14 | 17 | 316 | | 9 | 15 | 59 | | 7 | 437 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
5 | 6 | 171 | | 16 | 27 | 19 | | 11 | 257 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
19 | 23 | 487 | | 25 | 43 | 78 | | 18 | 693 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
9 | 16 | 290 | | 14 | 13 | 94 | | 8 | 444 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
6 | 2 | 155 | | 28 | 23 | 21 | | 3 | 238 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
15 | 18 | 444 | | 43 | 36 | 115 | | 10 | 682 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of 5,500 barrels per day. |
d | Includes 13 million barrels of NGL in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
e | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
f | Total proved NGL reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 115 million barrels, comprising less than 1 million barrels in Venezuela, Vietnam and Canada, and 115 million barrels in Russia. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 187 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liquids a b | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South
America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US c |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
242 | 170 | 1,444 | | 22 | 312 | | 268 | 52 | 2,509 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
431 | 79 | 989 | 195 | 32 | 255 | | 137 | 45 | 2,164 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
673 | 249 | 2,433 | 195 | 54 | 567 | | 405 | 96 | 4,673 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(78 | ) | (19 | ) | (141 | ) | (7 | ) | 30 | 26 | | 65 | (12 | ) | (136 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
12 | | 52 | | 1 | 2 | | 65 | | 132 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | 3 | | | | | 39 | 3 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production d |
(22 | ) | (13 | ) | (132 | ) | | (11 | ) | (80 | ) | | (52 | ) | (9 | ) | (319 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
(36 | ) | | (12 | ) | | | | | | | (48 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(124 | ) | (31 | ) | (229 | ) | (7 | ) | 20 | (52 | ) | | 117 | (18 | ) | (324 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December e |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
169 | 163 | 1,297 | | 29 | 320 | | 320 | 57 | 2,354 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
380 | 55 | 907 | 188 | 46 | 195 | | 202 | 22 | 1,994 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549 | 217 | 2,204 | 188 | 74 | 515 | | 523 | 78 | 4,348 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) f |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 339 | 12 | 2,492 | 198 | | 3,041 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 351 | 11 | 1,962 | 13 | | 2,337 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 691 | 23 | 4,453 | 211 | | 5,378 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | 1 | (21 | ) | (3 | ) | 384 | 1 | | 362 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 27 | | | | | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | 34 | | 4,579 | | | 4,613 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 11 | | 228 | | | 239 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production |
| | | | (27 | ) | | (302 | ) | (85 | ) | | (414 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | (85 | ) | | (4,399 | ) | | | (4,485 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | (61 | ) | (3 | ) | 490 | (84 | ) | | 343 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December g h |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 316 | 10 | 3,063 | 120 | | 3,510 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 314 | 10 | 1,879 | 7 | | 2,210 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 630 | 20 | 4,943 | 127 | | 5,721 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
242 | 170 | 1,444 | | 361 | 324 | 2,492 | 466 | 52 | 5,550 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
431 | 79 | 989 | 195 | 384 | 266 | 1,962 | 150 | 45 | 4,501 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
673 | 249 | 2,433 | 195 | 745 | 590 | 4,453 | 616 | 96 | 10,051 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
169 | 163 | 1,297 | | 345 | 331 | 3,063 | 440 | 57 | 5,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
380 | 55 | 907 | 188 | 359 | 205 | 1,879 | 209 | 22 | 4,204 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
549 | 217 | 2,204 | 189 | 704 | 535 | 4,943 | 650 | 78 | 10,069 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 72 million barrels upon which a net profits royalty will be payable, over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
d | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of 5,500 barrels per day. |
e | Also includes 21 million barrels in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
f | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
g | Includes 23 million barrels in respect of the non-controlling interest in Rosneft. |
h | Total proved liquid reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 4,975 million barrels, comprising 1 million barrels in Canada, 32 million barrels in Venezuela, less than 1 million barrels in Vietnam and 4,943 million barrels in Russia. |
188 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
billion cubic feet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas a b | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South
America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
1,038 | 340 | 8,245 | 4 | 3,588 | 1,139 | | 926 | 3,282 | 18,562 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
666 | 141 | 2,986 | | 6,250 | 1,923 | | 413 | 2,323 | 14,702 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,704 | 481 | 11,231 | 4 | 9,838 | 3,062 | | 1,339 | 5,605 | 33,264 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(62 | ) | (47 | ) | (1,166 | ) | 10 | 62 | (138 | ) | | 2,148 | (140 | ) | 667 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
49 | | 630 | | 144 | 28 | | 94 | | 945 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
9 | | | | | | | | | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | 39 | | | 55 | | 1,875 | 511 | 2,480 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production c |
(66 | ) | (31 | ) | (635 | ) | (4 | ) | (819 | ) | (239 | ) | | (199 | ) | (289 | ) | (2,282 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
(677 | ) | | (152 | ) | | | | | (67 | ) | | (896 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(747 | ) | (78 | ) | (1,284 | ) | 6 | (613 | ) | (294 | ) | | 3,851 | 82 | 923 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December d |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
643 | 364 | 7,122 | 10 | 3,109 | 961 | | 1,519 | 3,932 | 17,660 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
314 | 39 | 2,825 | | 6,116 | 1,807 | | 3,671 | 1,755 | 16,527 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
957 | 403 | 9,947 | 10 | 9,225 | 2,768 | | 5,190 | 5,687 | 34,187 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) e |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 1,276 | 175 | 2,617 | 128 | | 4,196 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 904 | 164 | 1,759 | 18 | | 2,845 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 2,180 | 339 | 4,376 | 146 | | 7,041 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | 1 | 3 | 29 | 685 | 1 | | 719 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 64 | | | 3 | | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | 14 | | 8,871 | 33 | | 8,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 51 | | 254 | | | 305 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production c |
| | | | (163 | ) | (3 | ) | (292 | ) | (23 | ) | | (481 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | (38 | ) | | (4,669 | ) | (74 | ) | | (4,781 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | (69 | ) | 26 | 4,849 | (60 | ) | | 4,747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December f g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 1,364 | 230 | 4,171 | 72 | | 5,837 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 747 | 135 | 5,054 | 14 | | 5,951 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 2,111 | 365 | 9,225 | 86 | | 11,788 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
1,038 | 340 | 8,245 | 4 | 4,864 | 1,314 | 2,617 | 1,054 | 3,282 | 22,758 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
666 | 141 | 2,986 | | 7,154 | 2,087 | 1,759 | 431 | 2,323 | 17,547 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,704 | 481 | 11,231 | 4 | 12,018 | 3,401 | 4,376 | 1,485 | 5,605 | 40,305 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
643 | 364 | 7,122 | 10 | 4,473 | 1,191 | 4,171 | 1,591 | 3,932 | 23,497 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
314 | 39 | 2,825 | 1 | 6,863 | 1,942 | 5,054 | 3,685 | 1,755 | 22,478 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
957 | 403 | 9,947 | 11 | 11,336 | 3,133 | 9,225 | 5,276 | 5,687 | 45,975 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Includes 180 billion cubic feet of natural gas consumed in operations, 149 billion cubic feet in subsidiaries, 31 billion cubic feet in equity-accounted entities. |
d | Includes 2,685 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
e | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
f | Includes 41 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 0.44% non-controlling interest in Rosneft. |
g | Total proved gas reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 9,271 billion cubic feet, comprising 1 billion cubic feet in Canada, 14 billion cubic feet in Venezuela, 31 billion cubic feet in Vietnam and 9,225 billion cubic feet in Russia. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 189 |
Movements in estimated net proved reserves continued
million barrels of oil equivalent c | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total hydrocarbons a b | 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South
America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US d |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
421 | 229 | 2,865 | 1 | 640 | 508 | | 427 | 618 | 5,709 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
546 | 103 | 1,504 | 195 | 1,110 | 587 | | 209 | 445 | 4,699 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
967 | 332 | 4,369 | 196 | 1,750 | 1,095 | | 636 | 1,063 | 10,408 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
(89 | ) | (27 | ) | (342 | ) | (5 | ) | 41 | 3 | | 435 | (36 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
20 | | 161 | | 25 | 7 | | 81 | | 294 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
2 | | | | | | | | | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | 10 | | | 9 | | 363 | 91 | 473 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production e f |
(34 | ) | (18 | ) | (241 | ) | (1 | ) | (152 | ) | (121 | ) | | (86 | ) | (59 | ) | (712 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
(152 | ) | | (38 | ) | | | | | (12 | ) | | (202 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(253 | ) | (45 | ) | (450 | ) | (6 | ) | (86 | ) | (102 | ) | | 781 | (4 | ) | (165 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December g |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
280 | 225 | 2,525 | 2 | 564 | 486 | | 582 | 735 | 5,399 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
434 | 62 | 1,394 | 188 | 1,100 | 507 | | 835 | 324 | 4,844 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
714 | 287 | 3,919 | 190 | 1,664 | 993 | | 1,417 | 1,059 | 10,243 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) h |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 559 | 43 | 2,943 | 220 | | 3,765 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | | 508 | 39 | 2,265 | 15 | | 2,827 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | 1,067 | 82 | 5,208 | 235 | | 6,592 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes attributable to |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of previous estimates |
| | | 1 | (20 | ) | 2 | 502 | 1 | | 486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery |
| | | | 38 | | | 1 | | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of reserves-in-place |
| | | | 36 | | 6,108 | 6 | | 6,150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discoveries and extensions |
| | | | 20 | | 272 | | | 292 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Production f |
| | | | (55 | ) | (1 | ) | (353 | ) | (88 | ) | | (497 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales of reserves-in-place |
| | | | (92 | ) | | (5,204 | ) | (13 | ) | | (5,309 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | (73 | ) | 1 | 1,325 | (93 | ) | | 1,161 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December i j |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
| | | | 552 | 50 | 3,782 | 133 | | 4,517 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
| | | 1 | 442 | 33 | 2,751 | 9 | | 3,236 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | 1 | 994 | 83 | 6,533 | 142 | | 7,753 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 1 January |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
421 | 229 | 2,865 | 1 | 1,199 | 551 | 2,943 | 647 | 618 | 9,474 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
546 | 103 | 1,504 | 195 | 1,618 | 626 | 2,265 | 224 | 445 | 7,526 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
967 | 332 | 4,369 | 196 | 2,817 | 1,177 | 5,208 | 871 | 1,063 | 17,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
280 | 225 | 2,525 | 2 | 1,116 | 536 | 3,782 | 715 | 735 | 9,916 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped |
434 | 62 | 1,394 | 189 | 1,542 | 540 | 2,751 | 844 | 324 | 8,080 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
714 | 287 | 3,919 | 191 | 2,658 | 1,076 | 6,533 | 1,559 | 1,059 | 17,996 |
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | 5.8 billion cubic feet of natural gas = 1 million barrels of oil equivalent. |
d | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 72 million barrels of oil equivalent upon which a net profits royalty will be payable, over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
e | Excludes NGLs from processing plants in which an interest is held of 5,500 barrels of oil equivalent per day. |
f | Includes 31 million barrels of oil equivalent of natural gas consumed in operations, 26 million barrels of oil equivalent in subsidiaries, 5 million barrels of oil equivalent in equity-accounted entities. |
g | Includes 484 million barrels of oil equivalent in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
h | Volumes of equity-accounted entities include volumes of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
i | Includes 30 million barrels of oil equivalent in respect of the non-controlling interest in Rosneft. |
j | Total proved reserves held as part of our equity interest in Rosneft is 6,574 million barrels of oil equivalent, comprising 1 million barrels of oil equivalent in Canada, 34 million barrels of oil equivalent in Venezuela, 5 million barrels of oil equivalent in Vietnam and 6,533 million barrels of oil equivalent in Russia. |
190 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows and changes therein relating to proved oil and gas reserves
The following tables set out the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, and changes therein, relating to crude oil and natural gas production from the groups estimated proved reserves. This information is prepared in compliance with FASB Oil and Gas Disclosures requirements.
Future net cash flows have been prepared on the basis of certain assumptions which may or may not be realized. These include the timing of future production, the estimation of crude oil and natural gas reserves and the application of average crude oil and natural gas prices and exchange rates from the previous 12 months. Furthermore, both proved reserves estimates and production forecasts are subject to revision as further technical information becomes available and economic conditions change. BP cautions against relying on the information presented because of the highly arbitrary nature of the assumptions on which it is based and its lack of comparability with the historical cost information presented in the financial statements.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South
America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future cash inflows a |
27,500 | 7,800 | 98,100 | 7,200 | 20,100 | 32,800 | | 65,200 | 32,000 | 290,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future production cost b |
15,700 | 5,300 | 56,300 | 4,200 | 8,600 | 12,000 | | 35,900 | 15,200 | 153,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future development cost b |
4,700 | 700 | 18,800 | 1,700 | 7,000 | 8,100 | | 18,200 | 4,500 | 63,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future taxation c |
2,900 | 800 | 3,100 | | 1,700 | 3,300 | | 3,800 | 4,000 | 19,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future net cash flows |
4,200 | 1,000 | 19,900 | 1,300 | 2,800 | 9,400 | | 7,300 | 8,300 | 54,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% annual discount d |
1,900 | 300 | 7,400 | 900 | 900 | 4,300 | | 3,700 | 4,400 | 23,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows e |
2,300 | 700 | 12,500 | 400 | 1,900 | 5,100 | | 3,600 | 3,900 | 30,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) f |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future cash inflows a |
| | | | 39,900 | | 182,300 | 3,700 | | 225,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future production cost b |
| | | | 20,200 | | 101,200 | 2,200 | | 123,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future development cost b |
| | | | 5,300 | | 11,000 | 1,300 | | 17,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future taxation c |
| | | | 3,900 | | 12,400 | 100 | | 16,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future net cash flows |
| | | | 10,500 | | 57,700 | 100 | | 68,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% annual discount d |
| | | | 6,700 | | 33,800 | | | 40,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows g h |
| | | | 3,800 | | 23,900 | 100 | | 27,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows |
2,300 | 700 | 12,500 | 400 | 5,700 | 5,100 | 23,900 | 3,700 | 3,900 | 58,200 |
The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows:
$ million | ||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
Equity-accounted
entities (BP share) |
Total subsidiaries and
equity-accounted entities |
||||||||||||
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs |
(27,900 | ) | (7,300 | ) | (35,200 | ) | ||||||||
Development costs for the current year as estimated in previous year |
15,000 | 4,500 | 19,500 | |||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less related costs |
600 | 700 | 1,300 | |||||||||||
Net changes in prices and production cost |
(100,400 | ) | (24,700 | ) | (125,100 | ) | ||||||||
Revisions of previous reserves estimates |
13,500 | 500 | 14,000 | |||||||||||
Net change in taxation |
38,600 | 2,300 | 40,900 | |||||||||||
Future development costs |
3,200 | (100 | ) | 3,100 | ||||||||||
Net change in purchase and sales of reserves-in-place |
(700 | ) | 300 | (400 | ) | |||||||||
Addition of 10% annual discount |
8,000 | 4,700 | 12,700 | |||||||||||
Total change in the standardized measure during the year i |
(50,100 | ) | (19,100 | ) | (69,200 | ) |
a | The marker prices used were Brent $54.17/bbl, Henry Hub $2.59/mmBtu. |
b | Production costs, which include production taxes, and development costs relating to future production of proved reserves are based on the continuation of existing economic conditions. Future decommissioning costs are included. |
c | Taxation is computed using appropriate year-end statutory corporate income tax rates. |
d | Future net cash flows from oil and natural gas production are discounted at 10% regardless of the group assessment of the risk associated with its producing activities. |
e | Non-controlling interests in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC amounted to $600 million. |
f | The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows of equity-accounted entities includes standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
g | Non-controlling interests in Rosneft amounted to $93 million in Russia. |
h | No equity-accounted future cash flows in Africa because proved reserves are received as a result of contractual arrangements, with no associated costs. |
i | Total change in the standardized measure during the year includes the effect of exchange rate movements. Exchange rate effects arising from the translation of our share of Rosneft to US dollars are included within Net changes in prices and production cost. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 191 |
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows and changes therein relating to proved oil and gas reserves continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South
America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future cash inflows a |
54,400 | 14,900 | 216,600 | 11,000 | 35,300 | 55,800 | | 90,300 | 54,800 | 533,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future production cost b |
21,400 | 8,100 | 90,500 | 4,800 | 11,300 | 15,600 | | 41,500 | 17,600 | 210,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future development cost b |
7,300 | 1,400 | 24,500 | 1,600 | 8,000 | 9,600 | | 23,000 | 5,700 | 81,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future taxation c |
16,400 | 3,000 | 32,900 | 700 | 8,400 | 10,100 | | 5,100 | 9,400 | 86,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future net cash flows |
9,300 | 2,400 | 68,700 | 3,900 | 7,600 | 20,500 | | 20,700 | 22,100 | 155,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% annual discount d |
4,700 | 700 | 33,100 | 2,500 | 3,100 | 7,800 | | 11,000 | 11,800 | 74,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows e |
4,600 | 1,700 | 35,600 | 1,400 | 4,500 | 12,700 | | 9,700 | 10,300 | 80,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) f |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future cash inflows a |
| | | | 47,300 | | 349,200 | 10,200 | | 406,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future production cost b |
| | | | 22,300 | | 200,000 | 7,800 | | 230,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future development cost b |
| | | | 5,700 | | 17,400 | 2,100 | | 25,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future taxation c |
| | | | 6,700 | | 24,200 | 100 | | 31,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future net cash flows |
| | | | 12,600 | | 107,600 | 200 | | 120,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% annual discount d |
| | | | 8,000 | | 65,500 | | | 73,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows g h |
| | | | 4,600 | | 42,100 | 200 | | 46,900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows |
4,600 | 1,700 | 35,600 | 1,400 | 9,100 | 12,700 | 42,100 | 9,900 | 10,300 | 127,400 |
The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows:
$ million | ||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
Equity-accounted
entities (BP share) |
Total subsidiaries and
equity-accounted entities |
||||||||||||
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs |
(30,500 | ) | (6,900 | ) | (37,400 | ) | ||||||||
Development costs for the current year as estimated in previous year |
15,700 | 3,600 | 19,300 | |||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less related costs |
1,900 | 1,500 | 3,400 | |||||||||||
Net changes in prices and production cost |
(17,000 | ) | 10,500 | (6,500 | ) | |||||||||
Revisions of previous reserves estimates |
1,200 | 2,000 | 3,200 | |||||||||||
Net change in taxation |
17,300 | (4,900 | ) | 12,400 | ||||||||||
Future development costs |
(4,500 | ) | (400 | ) | (4,900 | ) | ||||||||
Net change in purchase and sales of reserves-in-place |
(700 | ) | | (700 | ) | |||||||||
Addition of 10% annual discount |
8,800 | 3,800 | 12,600 | |||||||||||
Total change in the standardized measure during the year i |
(7,800 | ) | 9,200 | 1,400 |
a | The marker prices used were Brent $101.27/bbl, Henry Hub $4.31/mmBtu. |
b | Production costs, which include production taxes, and development costs relating to future production of proved reserves are based on the continuation of existing economic conditions. Future decommissioning costs are included. |
c | Taxation is computed using appropriate year-end statutory corporate income tax rates. |
d | Future net cash flows from oil and natural gas production are discounted at 10% regardless of the group assessment of the risk associated with its producing activities. |
e | Non-controlling interests in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC amounted to $1,400 million. |
f | The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows of equity-accounted entities includes standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
g | Non-controlling interests in Rosneft amounted to $100 million in Russia. |
h | No equity-accounted future cash flows in Africa because proved reserves are received as a result of contractual arrangements, with no associated costs. |
i | Total change in the standardized measure during the year includes the effect of exchange rate movements. Exchange rate effects arising from the translation of our share of Rosneft to US dollars are included within Net changes in prices and production cost. |
192 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows and changes therein relating to proved oil and gas reserves continued
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South
America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future cash inflows a |
66,200 | 26,300 | 234,500 | 9,400 | 40,000 | 67,500 | | 89,000 | 57,600 | 590,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future production cost b |
21,900 | 11,200 | 99,000 | 4,600 | 11,600 | 17,800 | | 35,000 | 20,000 | 221,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future development cost b |
6,500 | 2,000 | 27,700 | 2,000 | 7,600 | 10,900 | | 23,700 | 6,900 | 87,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future taxation c |
23,900 | 8,000 | 37,000 | 400 | 11,100 | 14,300 | | 6,200 | 8,100 | 109,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future net cash flows |
13,900 | 5,100 | 70,800 | 2,400 | 9,700 | 24,500 | | 24,100 | 22,600 | 173,100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% annual discount d |
6,800 | 2,200 | 34,300 | 1,900 | 4,200 | 9,300 | | 13,300 | 12,800 | 84,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows e |
7,100 | 2,900 | 36,500 | 500 | 5,500 | 15,200 | | 10,800 | 9,800 | 88,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) f |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future cash inflows a |
| | | | 45,800 | | 255,600 | 14,300 | | 315,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future production cost b |
| | | | 22,500 | | 139,000 | 11,800 | | 173,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future development cost b |
| | | | 6,000 | | 19,700 | 2,100 | | 27,800 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future taxation c |
| | | | 5,900 | | 15,200 | 100 | | 21,200 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Future net cash flows |
| | | | 11,400 | | 81,700 | 300 | | 93,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10% annual discount d |
| | | | 6,900 | | 48,700 | 100 | | 55,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows g h |
| | | | 4,500 | | 33,000 | 200 | | 37,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows |
7,100 | 2,900 | 36,500 | 500 | 10,000 | 15,200 | 33,000 | 11,000 | 9,800 | 126,000 |
The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows:
$ million | ||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
Equity-accounted
entities (BP share) |
Total subsidiaries and
equity-accounted entities |
||||||||||||
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net of production costs |
(30,600 | ) | (7,900 | ) | (38,500 | ) | ||||||||
Development costs for the current year as estimated in previous year |
14,000 | 3,200 | 17,200 | |||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and improved recovery, less related costs |
1,900 | 2,000 | 3,900 | |||||||||||
Net changes in prices and production cost |
(1,800 | ) | (100 | ) | (1,900 | ) | ||||||||
Revisions of previous reserves estimates |
(3,100 | ) | (400 | ) | (3,500 | ) | ||||||||
Net change in taxation |
12,900 | 3,400 | 16,300 | |||||||||||
Future development costs |
(4,100 | ) | (2,100 | ) | (6,200 | ) | ||||||||
Net change in purchase and sales of reserves-in-place |
(3,500 | ) | 9,000 | 5,500 | ||||||||||
Addition of 10% annual discount |
9,300 | 2,800 | 12,100 | |||||||||||
Total change in the standardized measure during the year i |
(5,000 | ) | 9,900 | 4,900 |
a | The marker prices used were Brent $108.02/bbl, Henry Hub $3.66/mmBtu. |
b | Production costs, which include production taxes, and development costs relating to future production of proved reserves are based on the continuation of existing economic conditions. Future decommissioning costs are included. |
c | Taxation is computed using appropriate year-end statutory corporate income tax rates. |
d | Future net cash flows from oil and natural gas production are discounted at 10% regardless of the group assessment of the risk associated with its producing activities. |
e | Non-controlling interests in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC amounted to $1,700 million. |
f | The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows of equity-accounted entities includes standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows of equity-accounted investments of those entities. |
g | Non-controlling interests in Rosneft amounted to $200 million in Russia. |
h | No equity-accounted future cash flows in Africa because proved reserves are received as a result of contractual arrangements, with no associated costs. |
i | Total change in the standardized measure during the year includes the effect of exchange rate movements. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 193 |
Operational and statistical information
The following tables present operational and statistical information related to production, drilling, productive wells and acreage. Figures include amounts attributable to assets held for sale.
Crude oil and natural gas production
The following table shows crude oil, natural gas liquids and natural gas production for the years ended 31 December 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Production for the year a b
Europe |
North
America |
South
America |
Africa | Asia | Australasia | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia c |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil d | thousand barrels per day | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
72 | 38 | 323 | 3 | 12 | 270 | | 237 | 17 | 971 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
46 | 41 | 347 | | 13 | 222 | | 156 | 19 | 844 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
58 | 31 | 305 | | 17 | 217 | | 141 | 21 | 789 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
thousand barrels per day |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
7 | 5 | 56 | | 11 | 7 | | 1 | 3 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
2 | 5 | 63 | | 12 | 5 | | | 3 | 91 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
3 | 4 | 58 | | 12 | 3 | | 1 | 4 | 86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas e | million cubic feet per day | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
155 | 111 | 1,528 | 10 | 1,922 | 589 | | 380 | 801 | 5,495 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
71 | 102 | 1,519 | 10 | 2,147 | 513 | | 408 | 814 | 5,585 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
157 | 80 | 1,539 | 11 | 2,221 | 561 | | 490 | 784 | 5,845 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil d | thousand barrels per day | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
| | | | 68 | | 809 | 97 | | 974 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | | | 65 | | 816 | 98 | | 979 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
| | | | 62 | | 826 | 232 | | 1,120 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids | thousand barrels per day | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
| | | | 3 | 3 | 4 | | | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | | | 3 | 4 | 5 | | | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
| | | | 3 | 5 | 11 | | | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas e | million cubic feet per day | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
| | | | 435 | | 1,195 | 21 | | 1,651 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | | | 402 | | 1,084 | 28 | | 1,515 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
| | | | 384 | | 801 | 30 | | 1,216 |
a | Production excludes royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Amounts reported for Russia include BPs share of Rosneft worldwide activities, including insignificant amounts outside Russia. |
d | Crude oil includes condensate. |
e | Natural gas production excludes gas consumed in operations. |
Productive oil and gas wells and acreage
The following tables show the number of gross and net productive oil and natural gas wells and total gross and net developed and undeveloped oil and natural gas acreage in which the group and its equity-accounted entities had interests as at 31 December 2015. A gross well or acre is one in which a whole or fractional working interest is owned, while the number of net wells or acres is the sum of the whole or fractional working interests in gross wells or acres. Productive wells are producing wells and wells capable of production. Developed acreage is the acreage within the boundary of a field, on which development wells have been drilled, which could produce the reserves; while undeveloped acres are those on which wells have not been drilled or completed to a point that would permit the production of commercial quantities, whether or not such acres contain proved reserves.
Europe |
North America |
South
America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia a |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of productive wells at 31 December 2015 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil wells c |
gross | 121 | 65 | 2,428 | 143 | 4,848 | 659 | 45,134 | 1,036 | 12 | 54,446 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
net | 77 | 26 | 830 | 33 | 2,680 | 457 | 8,914 | 354 | 2 | 13,374 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas wells d |
gross | 63 | 5 | 22,760 | 309 | 821 | 144 | 791 | 860 | 73 | 25,826 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
net | 27 | 1 | 9,492 | 153 | 303 | 62 | 156 | 320 | 14 | 10,529 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and natural gas acreage at 31 December 2015 |
|
thousands of acres | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Developed |
gross | 128 | 40 | 6,226 | 237 | 1,386 | 655 | 4,828 | 866 | 194 | 14,558 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
net | 74 | 17 | 3,366 | 111 | 417 | 255 | 908 | 267 | 36 | 5,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Undeveloped e |
gross | 1,500 | 1,501 | 6,662 | 9,712 | 22,046 | 32,692 | 378,688 | 7,395 | 15,661 | 475,856 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
net | 1,056 | 571 | 4,855 | 5,566 | 6,619 | 21,210 | 73,971 | 2,518 | 9,743 | 126,108 |
a | Based on information received from Rosneft as at 31 December 2015. |
b | Because of rounding some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
c | Includes approximately 7,944 gross (1,582 net) multiple completion wells (more than one formation producing into the same well bore). |
d | Includes approximately 3,232 gross (1,534 net) multiple completion wells. If one of the multiple completions in a well is an oil completion, the well is classified as an oil well. |
e | Undeveloped acreage includes leases and concessions. |
194 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Operational and statistical information continued
Net oil and gas wells completed or abandoned
The following table shows the number of net productive and dry exploratory and development oil and natural gas wells completed or abandoned in the years indicated by the group and its equity-accounted entities. Productive wells include wells in which hydrocarbons were encountered and the drilling or completion of which, in the case of exploratory wells, has been suspended pending further drilling or evaluation. A dry well is one found to be incapable of producing hydrocarbons in sufficient quantities to justify completion.
Europe |
North America |
South
America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploratory |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Productive |
| | 4.0 | | 1.1 | 2.6 | 4.5 | | | 12.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dry |
| | | | 0.4 | 1.0 | | | 0.2 | 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Productive |
1.6 | 0.4 | 235.6 | | 143.1 | 20.7 | 91.4 | 51.2 | 0.9 | 544.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dry |
| | | | 2.3 | 1.3 | | | | 3.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploratory |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Productive |
2.9 | | 5.3 | | 3.7 | 0.7 | 5.3 | 0.6 | | 18.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dry |
0.5 | | 7.9 | | 1.4 | 1.6 | | 1.4 | 0.2 | 13.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Productive |
3.1 | 1.8 | 294.1 | 1.5 | 100.5 | 13.8 | 76.2 | 46.3 | | 537.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dry |
| 0.8 | | 0.1 | 3.9 | 1.0 | | 0.4 | 0.4 | 6.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploratory |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Productive |
1.0 | | 12.7 | | 4.5 | 1.5 | 4.0 | 3.5 | | 27.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dry |
| | 1.1 | | 1.4 | 0.6 | | 0.9 | 0.5 | 4.5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Productive |
1.0 | 1.2 | 285.7 | | 94.6 | 12.6 | 395.0 | 58.0 | 0.2 | 848.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dry |
| 0.2 | 0.4 | | 2.7 | 0.2 | | 0.7 | 0.4 | 4.6 |
a | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
Drilling and production activities in progress
The following table shows the number of exploratory and development oil and natural gas wells in the process of being drilled by the group and its equity-accounted entities as of 31 December 2015. Suspended development wells and long-term suspended exploratory wells are also included in the table.
Europe |
North America |
South
America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total a | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of
Europe |
US |
Rest of
North America |
Russia |
Rest of
Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
At 31 December 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exploratory |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross |
1.0 | | 11.0 | | | 4.0 | | | | 16.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net |
0.3 | | 6.6 | | | 1.8 | | | | 8.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross |
2.0 | | 309.0 | 14.0 | 11.0 | 40.0 | | 55.0 | 3.0 | 434.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net |
1.3 | | 109.0 | 7.0 | 6.2 | 18.9 | | 19.8 | 0.5 | 162.7 |
a | Because of rounding, some totals may not exactly agree with the sum of their component parts. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 195 |
Pages 196-213 have been removed as they do not form part of BPs Annual Report on Form 20-F as filed with the SEC.
196 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
THIS PAGE HAS BEEN LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY
214 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 215 |
Selected financial information
This information, insofar as it relates to 2015, has been extracted or derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of the BP group presented on page 95. Note 1 to the financial statements includes details on the basis of preparation of these financial statements. The selected information should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes elsewhere herein.
$ million except per share amounts | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income statement data |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and other operating revenues |
222,894 | 353,568 | 379,136 | 375,765 | 375,713 | |||||||||||||||||
Underlying replacement cost (RC) profit before interest and taxation * |
8,791 | 20,818 | 22,776 | 26,454 | 33,601 | |||||||||||||||||
Net favourable (unfavourable) impact of non-operating items * and fair value accounting effects * |
(14,820 | ) | (8,196 | ) | 9,283 | (6,091 | ) | 3,580 | ||||||||||||||
RC profit (loss) before interest and taxation * |
(6,029 | ) | 12,622 | 32,059 | 20,363 | 37,181 | ||||||||||||||||
Inventory holding gains (losses) * |
(1,889 | ) | (6,210 | ) | (290 | ) | (594 | ) | 2,634 | |||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and taxation |
(7,918 | ) | 6,412 | 31,769 | 19,769 | 39,815 | ||||||||||||||||
Finance costs and net finance expense relating to pensions and other post-retirement benefits |
(1,653 | ) | (1,462 | ) | (1,548 | ) | (1,638 | ) | (1,587 | ) | ||||||||||||
Taxation |
3,171 | (947 | ) | (6,463 | ) | (6,880 | ) | (12,619 | ) | |||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year |
(6,400 | ) | 4,003 | 23,758 | 11,251 | 25,609 | ||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders |
(6,482 | ) | 3,780 | 23,451 | 11,017 | 25,212 | ||||||||||||||||
Inventory holding (gains) losses, net of taxation |
1,320 | 4,293 | 230 | 411 | (1,800 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
RC profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders |
(5,162 | ) | 8,073 | 23,681 | 11,428 | 23,412 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-operating items and fair value accounting effects, net of taxation |
11,067 | 4,063 | (10,253 | ) | 5,643 | (2,242 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Underlying RC profit for the year attributable to BP shareholders |
5,905 | 12,136 | 13,428 | 17,071 | 21,170 | |||||||||||||||||
Per ordinary share cents |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
(35.39 | ) | 20.55 | 123.87 | 57.89 | 133.35 | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
(35.39 | ) | 20.42 | 123.12 | 57.50 | 131.74 | ||||||||||||||||
RC profit (loss) for the year attributable to BP shareholders |
(28.18 | ) | 43.90 | 125.08 | 60.05 | 123.83 | ||||||||||||||||
Underlying RC profit for the year attributable to BP shareholders |
32.22 | 66.00 | 70.92 | 89.70 | 111.97 | |||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid per share cents |
40.00 | 39.00 | 36.50 | 33.00 | 28.00 | |||||||||||||||||
pence |
26.383 | 23.850 | 23.399 | 20.852 | 17.404 | |||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure and acquisitions, on an accruals basis |
19,531 | 23,781 | 36,612 | 25,204 | 31,959 | |||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions and asset exchanges, on an accruals basis |
49 | 420 | 71 | 200 | 11,283 | |||||||||||||||||
Other inorganic capital expenditure, on an accruals basis |
734 | 469 | 11,941 | 1,054 | 1,096 | |||||||||||||||||
Organic capital expenditure * , on an accruals basis |
18,748 | 22,892 | 24,600 | 23,950 | 19,580 | |||||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data (at 31 December) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
261,832 | 284,305 | 305,690 | 300,466 | 292,907 | |||||||||||||||||
Net assets |
98,387 | 112,642 | 130,407 | 119,752 | 112,585 | |||||||||||||||||
Share capital |
5,049 | 5,023 | 5,129 | 5,261 | 5,224 | |||||||||||||||||
BP shareholders equity |
97,216 | 111,441 | 129,302 | 118,546 | 111,568 | |||||||||||||||||
Finance debt due after more than one year |
46,224 | 45,977 | 40,811 | 38,767 | 35,169 | |||||||||||||||||
Net debt to net debt plus equity * |
21.6% | 16.7% | 16.2% | 18.7% | 20.4% | |||||||||||||||||
Ordinary share data a |
Shares million | |||||||||||||||||||||
Basic weighted average number of shares |
18,324 | 18,385 | 18,931 | 19,028 | 18,905 | |||||||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average number of shares |
18,324 | 18,497 | 19,046 | 19,158 | 19,136 |
a | The number of ordinary shares shown has been used to calculate the per share amounts. |
216 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Non-operating items
Non-operating items are charges and credits included in the financial statements that BP discloses separately because it considers such disclosures to be meaningful and relevant to investors. They are items that management considers not to be part of underlying business operations and are disclosed in order to enable investors to understand better and evaluate the groups reported financial performance. An analysis of non-operating items is shown in the table below.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Upstream |
||||||||||||||
Impairment and gain (loss) on sale of businesses and fixed assets a |
(1,204 | ) | (6,576 | ) | (802 | ) | ||||||||
Environmental and other provisions |
(24 | ) | (60 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring, integration and rationalization costs |
(410 | ) | (100 | ) | | |||||||||
Fair value gain (loss) on embedded derivatives |
120 | 430 | 459 | |||||||||||
Other b c |
(717 | ) | 8 | (1,001 | ) | |||||||||
(2,235 | ) | (6,298 | ) | (1,364 | ) | |||||||||
Downstream |
||||||||||||||
Impairment and gain (loss) on sale of businesses and fixed assets a |
131 | (1,190 | ) | (348 | ) | |||||||||
Environmental and other provisions |
(108 | ) | (133 | ) | (134 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring, integration and rationalization costs |
(607 | ) | (165 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||
Fair value gain (loss) on embedded derivatives |
| | | |||||||||||
Other |
(6 | ) | (82 | ) | (38 | ) | ||||||||
(590 | ) | (1,570 | ) | (535 | ) | |||||||||
TNK-BP |
||||||||||||||
Impairment and gain (loss) on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
| | 12,500 | |||||||||||
Environmental and other provisions |
| | | |||||||||||
Restructuring, integration and rationalization costs |
| | | |||||||||||
Fair value gain (loss) on embedded derivatives |
| | | |||||||||||
Other |
| | | |||||||||||
| | 12,500 | ||||||||||||
Rosneft |
||||||||||||||
Impairment and gain (loss) on sale of businesses and fixed assets |
| 225 | (35 | ) | ||||||||||
Environmental and other provisions |
| | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Restructuring, integration and rationalization costs |
| | | |||||||||||
Fair value gain (loss) on embedded derivatives |
| | | |||||||||||
Other |
| | | |||||||||||
| 225 | (45 | ) | |||||||||||
Other businesses and corporate |
||||||||||||||
Impairment and gain (loss) on sale of businesses and fixed assets a |
(170 | ) | (304 | ) | (196 | ) | ||||||||
Environmental and other provisions |
(151 | ) | (180 | ) | (241 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring, integration and rationalization costs |
(71 | ) | (176 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||
Fair value gain (loss) on embedded derivatives |
| | | |||||||||||
Other c |
(155 | ) | (10 | ) | 19 | |||||||||
(547 | ) | (670 | ) | (421 | ) | |||||||||
Gulf of Mexico oil spill response |
(11,709 | ) | (781 | ) | (430 | ) | ||||||||
Total before interest and taxation |
(15,081 | ) | (9,094 | ) | 9,705 | |||||||||
Finance costs d |
(247 | ) | (38 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||||
Taxation credit e (charge) |
4,056 | 4,512 | 867 | |||||||||||
Total after taxation |
(11,272 | ) | (4,620 | ) | 10,533 |
a | See Financial statements Note 4 for further information on impairments. |
b | 2014 included a $395-million write-off relating to Block KG D6 in India. 2013 included $845 million relating to the value ascribed to block BM-CAL-13 offshore Brazil, following the acquisition of upstream assets from Devon Energy in 2011, which was written off as a result of the Pitanga exploration well not encountering commercial quantities of oil or gas. |
c | 2015 principally relates to BPs share of impairment losses recognized by equity-accounted entities. |
d | Finance costs relate to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. See Financial statements Note 2 for further details. |
e | From 2014, tax is based on statutory rates except for non-deductible or non-taxable items. For 2013, tax for the Gulf of Mexico oil spill and certain impairment losses, disposal gains and fair value gains and losses on embedded derivatives, is based on statutory rates, except for non-deductible items; for other items reported for consolidated subsidiaries, tax is calculated using the groups discrete quarterly effective tax rate (adjusted for the items noted above, equity-accounted earnings and certain deferred tax adjustments relating to changes in UK taxation). |
* Defined on page 256. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 217 |
Non-GAAP information on fair value accounting effects
The impacts of fair value accounting effects, relative to managements internal measure of performance, and a reconciliation to GAAP information is set out below. Further information on fair value accounting effects is provided on page 256.
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Upstream |
||||||||||||||
Unrecognized gains (losses) brought forward from previous period |
(191 | ) | (160 | ) | (404 | ) | ||||||||
Unrecognized (gains) losses carried forward |
296 | 191 | 160 | |||||||||||
Favourable (unfavourable) impact relative to managements measure of performance |
105 | 31 | (244 | ) | ||||||||||
Downstream a |
||||||||||||||
Unrecognized gains (losses) brought forward from previous period |
(188 | ) | 679 | 501 | ||||||||||
Unrecognized (gains) losses carried forward |
344 | 188 | (679 | ) | ||||||||||
Favourable (unfavourable) impact relative to managements measure of performance |
156 | 867 | (178 | ) | ||||||||||
261 | 898 | (422 | ) | |||||||||||
Taxation credit (charge) b |
(56 | ) | (341 | ) | 142 | |||||||||
205 | 557 | (280 | ) | |||||||||||
By region |
||||||||||||||
Upstream |
||||||||||||||
US |
(66 | ) | 23 | (269 | ) | |||||||||
Non-US |
171 | 8 | 25 | |||||||||||
105 | 31 | (244 | ) | |||||||||||
Downstream a |
||||||||||||||
US |
102 | 914 | (211 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-US |
54 | (47 | ) | 33 | ||||||||||
156 | 867 | (178 | ) |
a | Fair value accounting effects arise solely in the fuels business. |
b | From 2014, tax is calculated using statutory rates. For 2013 tax is calculated using the groups discrete quarterly effective tax rate (adjusted for certain non-operating items, equity-accounted earnings and certain deferred tax adjustments relating to changes in UK taxation). |
Reconciliation of non-GAAP information
$ million | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Upstream |
||||||||||||||
RC profit (loss) before interest and tax adjusted for fair value accounting effects |
(1,042 | ) | 8,903 | 16,901 | ||||||||||
Impact of fair value accounting effects |
105 | 31 | (244 | ) | ||||||||||
RC profit (loss) before interest and tax |
(937 | ) | 8,934 | 16,657 | ||||||||||
Downstream |
||||||||||||||
RC profit before interest and tax adjusted for fair value accounting effects |
6,955 | 2,871 | 3,097 | |||||||||||
Impact of fair value accounting effects |
156 | 867 | (178 | ) | ||||||||||
RC profit before interest and tax |
7,111 | 3,738 | 2,919 | |||||||||||
Total group |
||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and tax adjusted for fair value accounting effects |
(8,179 | ) | 5,514 | 32,191 | ||||||||||
Impact of fair value accounting effects |
261 | 898 | (422 | ) | ||||||||||
Profit (loss) before interest and tax |
(7,918 | ) | 6,412 | 31,769 |
Operating capital employed *
$ million | ||||||
2015 | ||||||
Upstream |
107,197 | |||||
Downstream |
34,935 | |||||
Rosneft |
5,797 | |||||
Other businesses and corporate |
19,399 | |||||
Gulf of Mexico oil spill response |
(18,797 | ) | ||||
Consolidation adjustment UPII * |
(68 | ) | ||||
Total operating capital employed |
148,463 | |||||
Liabilities for current and deferred taxation |
(8,535 | ) | ||||
Goodwill |
11,627 | |||||
Finance debt |
(53,168 | ) | ||||
Net assets |
98,387 |
218 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Liquidity and capital resources
Financial framework
We maintain our financial framework to support the pursuit of value growth for shareholders, while ensuring a secure financial base. BPs objective over time is to grow sustainable free cash flow * through a combination of material growth in underlying operating cash flow * and a strong focus on capital discipline, providing a sound platform to grow shareholder distributions. The priority is to grow dividend per share progressively in accordance with the growth in sustainable operating cash flow from our businesses over time. Any surplus cash over and above that required for capital investment and dividend payments will be biased towards further shareholder distributions through buybacks or other mechanisms.
In the near term, and reflecting the weaker oil price environment, the focus is to manage the business through a period of low oil prices and support the dividend, which remains a priority. Our principal objective over the medium term is to re-establish a balance in our financial framework, where operating cash flow (excluding payments related to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill) covers capital expenditure and the dividend at an assumed medium-term price of $60 per barrel. We aim to do this while maintaining safe and reliable operations, preserving core growth activities and sustaining the dividend. We responded quickly to the lower environment, resetting both the capital and cash cost base of the Group. We expect organic capital expenditure in 2016 to be at the lower end of the range of $17-19 billion. In 2016 we expect to announce a further $3-5 billion of divestments and from 2017 we expect divestments to average the historical norm of around $2-3 billion per annum.
We aim to manage gearing * with some flexibility around the 20% level while volatile market conditions remain and maintain a significant liquidity buffer. We expect the net debt ratio to be above 20% while oil prices remain weak. As well as uncertainties relating to current lower oil prices, the group also continues to face uncertainties relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill as explained in Financing the groups activities below.
We will keep our financial framework under review as we monitor oil and gas prices and their impact on industry costs as we move through 2016 and beyond.
Dividends and other distributions to shareholders
Since resuming dividend payments with a quarterly dividend of 7 cents per share paid in 2011, it has increased by 43% to 10 cents per share paid in the fourth quarter of 2015. The dividend level is regularly reviewed by the board.
The total dividend paid in cash to BP shareholders in 2015 was $6.7 billion (2014 $5.9 billion) with shareholders also having the option to receive a scrip dividend. The dividend is determined in US dollars, the economic currency of BP.
Details of share repurchases to satisfy the requirements of certain employee share-based payment plans are set out on page 253. There were no other buyback programmes during 2015.
Financing the groups activities
The groups principal commodities, oil and gas, are priced internationally in US dollars. Group policy has generally been to minimize economic exposure to currency movements by financing operations with US dollar debt. Where debt is issued in other currencies, including euros, it is generally swapped back to US dollars using derivative contracts, or else hedged by maintaining offsetting cash positions in the same currency.
The cash balances of the group are mainly held in US dollars or swapped to US dollars, and holdings are well-diversified to reduce concentration risk. The group is not, therefore, exposed to significant currency risk regarding its borrowings. Also see Risk factors on page 53 for further information on risks associated with prices and markets and Financial statements Note 28.
The groups gross debt at 31 December 2015 amounted to $53.2 billion (2014 $52.9 billion). Of the total gross debt, $6.9 billion is classified as short term at the end of 2015 (2014 $6.9 billion). See Financial statements Note 25 for more information on the short-term balance.
Standard & Poors Ratings long-term credit rating for BP is A- and assigned a stable outlook and Moodys Investors Service rating is A2 (rating under review).
Net debt was $27.2 billion at the end of 2015 an increase of $4.6 billion from the 2014 year-end position of $22.6 billion. The ratio of net debt to net debt plus equity * was 21.6% at the end of 2015 (2014 16.7%). See Financial statements Note 26 for gross debt, which is the nearest equivalent measure on an IFRS basis, and for further information on net debt.
Cash and cash equivalents of $26.4 billion at 31 December 2015 (2014 $29.8 billion) are included in net debt. We manage our cash position to ensure the group has adequate cover to respond to potential short-term market illiquidity, and expect to maintain a robust cash position.
The group also has undrawn committed bank facilities of $7.4 billion (see Financial statements Note 28 for more information).
We believe that the group has sufficient working capital for foreseeable requirements, taking into account the amounts of undrawn borrowing facilities and levels of cash and cash equivalents, and the ongoing ability to generate cash.
The groups sources of funding, its access to capital markets and maintaining a strong cash position are described in Financial statements Note 24 and Note 28. Further information on the management of liquidity risk and credit risk, and the maturity profile and fixed/floating rate characteristics of the groups debt are also provided in Financial statements Note 25 and Note 28.
In relation to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, during 2015, BP signed agreements in principle to settle all federal and state claims, subject to court approval, and to settle claims made by more than 400 local government entities. These agreements significantly reduce the uncertainties faced by BP following the Gulf of Mexico oil spill in 2010. There continues to be uncertainty regarding the outcome or resolution of current or future litigation and the extent and timing of costs relating to the incident not covered by these agreements. See Risk factors on page 53 and Financial statements Note 2 for further information.
Off-balance sheet arrangements
At 31 December 2015, the groups share of third-party finance debt of equity-accounted entities was $11.8 billion (2014 $14.7 billion). These amounts are not reflected in the groups debt on the balance sheet. The group has issued third-party guarantees under which amounts outstanding, incremental to amounts recognized on the balance sheet, at 31 December 2015 were $35 million (2014 $83 million) in respect of liabilities of joint ventures * and associates * and $163 million (2014 $244 million) in respect of liabilities of other third parties. Of these amounts, $22 million (2014 $64 million) of the joint ventures and associates guarantees relate to borrowings and for other third-party guarantees, $119 million (2014 $126 million) relate to guarantees of borrowings. Details of operating lease commitments, which are not recognized on the balance sheet, are shown in the table below and provided in Financial statements Note 27.
The information above contains forward-looking statements, which by their nature involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will or may occur in the future and are outside the control of BP. You are urged to read the Cautionary statement on page 246 and Risk factors on page 53, which describe the risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
* Defined on page 256. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 219 |
Contractual obligations
The following table summarizes the groups capital expenditure commitments for property, plant and equipment at 31 December 2015 and the proportion of that expenditure for which contracts have been placed.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditure | Total | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
2021 and
thereafter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Committed |
36,972 | 15,408 | 8,009 | 7,248 | 4,490 | 855 | 962 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
of which is contracted |
10,379 | 6,224 | 2,031 | 1,317 | 645 | 75 | 87 |
Capital expenditure is considered to be committed when the project has received the appropriate level of internal management approval. For joint operations * , the net BP share is included in the amounts above.
In addition, at 31 December 2015, the group had committed to capital expenditure relating to investments in equity-accounted entities amounting to $4,229 million. Contracts were in place for $2,933 million of this total.
The following table summarizes the groups principal contractual obligations at 31 December 2015, distinguishing between those for which a liability is recognized on the balance sheet and those for which no liability is recognized. Further information on borrowings is given in Financial statements Note 25 and more information on operating leases is given in Financial statements Note 27.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected payments by period under contractual obligations | Total | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
2021 and
thereafter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance sheet obligations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Borrowings a |
56,692 | 7,764 | 6,502 | 6,815 | 6,600 | 6,741 | 22,270 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance lease future minimum lease payments b |
1,460 | 108 | 106 | 97 | 95 | 91 | 963 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Decommissioning liabilities c |
21,762 | 796 | 600 | 596 | 383 | 643 | 18,744 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Environmental liabilities c |
10,012 | 586 | 822 | 480 | 669 | 664 | 6,791 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Pensions and other post-retirement benefits d |
23,399 | 1,656 | 1,805 | 1,791 | 1,785 | 1,278 | 15,084 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
113,325 | 10,910 | 9,835 | 9,779 | 9,532 | 9,417 | 63,852 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Off-balance sheet obligations |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating lease future minimum lease payments e |
15,422 | 4,144 | 2,904 | 1,933 | 1,615 | 1,291 | 3,535 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconditional purchase obligations f |
120,286 | 47,859 | 12,489 | 8,743 | 7,540 | 5,594 | 38,061 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
135,708 | 52,003 | 15,393 | 10,676 | 9,155 | 6,885 | 41,596 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
249,033 | 62,913 | 25,228 | 20,455 | 18,687 | 16,302 | 105,448 |
a | Expected payments include interest totalling $4,227 million ($866 million in 2016, $754 million in 2017, $649 million in 2018, $541 million in 2019, $432 million in 2020 and $985 million thereafter). |
b | Expected payments include interest totalling $757 million ($62 million in 2016, $58 million in 2017, $55 million in 2018, $51 million in 2019, $46 million in 2020 and $485 million thereafter). |
c | The amounts are undiscounted. Environmental liabilities include those relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. |
d | Represents the expected future contributions to funded pension plans and payments by the group for unfunded pension plans and the expected future payments for other post-retirement benefits. |
e | The future minimum lease payments are before deducting related rental income from operating sub-leases. In the case of an operating lease entered into solely by BP as the operator of a joint operation, the amounts shown in the table represent the net future minimum lease payments, after deducting amounts reimbursed, or to be reimbursed, by joint operation partners. Where BP is not the operator of a joint operation, BPs share of the future minimum lease payments are included in the amounts shown, whether BP has co-signed the lease or not. Where operating lease costs are incurred in relation to the hire of equipment used in connection with a capital project, some or all of the cost may be capitalized as part of the capital cost of the project. |
f | Represents any agreement to purchase goods or services that is enforceable and legally binding and that specifies all significant terms (such as fixed or minimum purchase volumes, timing of purchase and pricing provisions). Agreements that do not specify all significant terms, or that are not enforceable, are excluded. The amounts shown include arrangements to secure long-term access to supplies of crude oil, natural gas, feedstocks and pipeline systems. In addition, the amounts shown for 2016 include purchase commitments existing at 31 December 2015 entered into principally to meet the groups short-term manufacturing and marketing requirements. The price risk associated with these crude oil, natural gas and power contracts is discussed in Financial statements Note 28. |
The following table summarizes the nature of the groups unconditional purchase obligations.
$ million | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Payments due by period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unconditional purchase obligations | Total | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 |
2021 and
thereafter |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil and oil products |
47,466 | 28,715 | 4,534 | 3,127 | 2,308 | 2,008 | 6,774 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas |
21,322 | 11,639 | 3,791 | 2,221 | 1,480 | 767 | 1,424 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Chemicals and other refinery feedstocks |
6,464 | 2,210 | 1,215 | 1,295 | 1,340 | 264 | 140 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Power |
4,918 | 2,558 | 1,031 | 478 | 292 | 121 | 438 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Utilities |
630 | 197 | 174 | 115 | 64 | 20 | 60 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Transportation |
21,138 | 1,190 | 1,008 | 971 | 960 | 1,291 | 15,718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Use of facilities and services |
18,348 | 1,350 | 736 | 536 | 1,096 | 1,123 | 13,507 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
120,286 | 47,859 | 12,489 | 8,743 | 7,540 | 5,594 | 38,061 |
220 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Our upstream operations are set out below by geographical area, with associated significant events for 2015. BPs percentage working interest in oil and gas assets is shown in brackets. Working interest is the cost-bearing ownership share of an oil or gas lease. Consequently, the percentages disclosed for certain agreements do not necessarily reflect the percentage interests in reserves and production.
In addition to exploration, development and production activities, our upstream business also includes midstream and LNG supply activities. Midstream activities involve the ownership and management of crude oil and natural gas pipelines, processing facilities and export terminals, LNG processing facilities and transportation, and our natural gas liquids (NGLs) extraction business.
Our LNG supply activities are located in Abu Dhabi, Angola, Australia, Indonesia and Trinidad. We market around 20% of our LNG production using BP LNG shipping and contractual rights to access import terminal capacity in the liquid markets of the US (via Cove Point), the UK (via the Isle of Grain), Spain (in Bilbao) and Italy (in Rovigo), with the remainder marketed directly to customers. LNG is supplied to customers in markets including Japan, South Korea, China, the Dominican Republic, Argentina, Brazil and Mexico.
Europe
BP is active in the North Sea and the Norwegian Sea. Our activities focus on maximizing recovery from existing producing fields and selected new field developments. BPs production is generated from three key areas: the Shetland area, comprising Magnus, Clair, Foinaven and Schiehallion fields; the central area, comprising Bruce, Andrew and ETAP fields; and Norway, comprising Valhall, Ula and Skarv fields.
| BP and its partners, ConocoPhillips, Chevron and Shell, announced their decision to proceed with a two-year appraisal programme to evaluate a potential third phase of the Clair field (BP 28.6%), west of the Shetland Islands in March 2013. In March we completed the sixth and final well of the programme. The Clair field partners will review the significant amount of data collected to determine the potential for development. |
| The Quad 204 project, a major redevelopment to extend the life of the Schiehallion and Loyal fields to the west of Shetland, continued in 2015. After successfully completing sea trials, Glen Lyon, the replacement floating production, storage and offload vessel (FPSO), departed South Korea in December at the start of its journey to the Shetlands. We also ran a major offshore campaign focusing on the pre-installation of risers and ancillary equipment in preparation for its arrival. As well as the new FPSO, the redevelopment includes extension of the existing subsea infrastructure and drilling new wells. In April, on behalf of its co-venturers, BP announced the start of a seven-year drilling campaign on the Loyal field by the new-build, semi-submersible drilling rig, Deepsea Aberdeen. |
| In June BP and its partners announced that the Clair Ridge platforms topside modules for accommodation and utilities had been installed. The next major milestone will be the installation of the production and drilling platform topside modules, scheduled for summer 2016, with production expected to commence in late 2017. |
| In July we were awarded five new blocks across two licences in the North Sea as part of the second tranche of the 28th licensing round by the UK Oil and Gas Authority, bringing the total blocks awarded to BP to 12 to date in this licensing round. |
| Maersk Oil announced the UK Oil and Gas Authoritys approval of development plans for the Culzean field in the UK North Sea in August. Culzean is operated by Maersk Oil on behalf of its partners, JX Nippon and BP (16%). |
| We completed the Magnus life extension project in July enabling Magnus to continue safe and compliant operations. This was the first project in our North Sea renewals programme, designed to extend the productive life of mature assets. Production for Magnus has been extended by five years to 2023. Additional accommodation has been constructed to enable maintenance of this ageing facility and a return to drilling in 2017. |
| The ETAP life extension and additional living-quarters project began in 2015 and is scheduled to run through 2016. These activities aim to delay cessation of production for the ETAP fields to 2030 by executing maintenance scope and installing additional living quarters on the central processing facility. Total investment on these projects is currently estimated at $360 million gross. |
| Operations at the Rhum gas field continued under a temporary management scheme announced by the UK government in 2013. Production was suspended between November 2010 and October 2014 following the imposition of EU sanctions on Iran. The field is owned by BP (50%) and the Iranian Oil Company (IOC) under a joint operating agreement. See International trade sanctions on page 242. |
| In December, a number of North Sea assets were subject to impairment charges totalling $830 million, primarily as a result of the lower price environment. These were however more than offset by impairment reversals of $945 million in relation to other assets in the region arising as a result of decreases in cost estimates and a reduction in the discount rate applied. |
In the UK North Sea, BP operates the Forties Pipeline System (FPS) (BP 100%), an integrated oil and NGLs transportation and processing system that handles production from around 80 fields in the central North Sea. The system has a capacity of more than 675mboe/d, with average throughput in 2015 of 442mboe/d. BP also operated and had a 36% interest in the Central Area Transmission System (CATS), a 400-kilometre natural gas pipeline system in the central UK sector of the North Sea providing transport and processing services. Average throughput in 2015 was 40mboe/d. In April, BP announced the sale of its equity in the CATS business to Antin Infrastructure Partners for a headline price of $486 million, and the sale completed in December. BP also operates the Sullom Voe oil and gas terminal in Shetland.
North America
Our upstream activities in North America take place in four main areas: deepwater Gulf of Mexico, the Lower 48 states, Alaska and Canada. For further information on BPs activities in connection with its responsibilities following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, see page 41.
BP has around 500 lease blocks in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico, making us one of the largest portfolio owners, and operates four production hubs.
| We announced a new ownership and operating model with Chevron and ConocoPhillips in January 2015. We sold approximately half of our equity interests in the Gila field to Chevron in December 2014 and approximately half of our equity interest in the Tiber field to them in January 2015. BP, Chevron and ConocoPhillips also have agreed to joint ownership interests in exploration blocks east of Gila known as Gibson (BP 34%). Chevron will operate Tiber (BP 31%), Gila (BP 34%) and Gibson. Operatorship transferred at the end of 2015 after BP finished drilling appraisal wells at Gila and Tiber. These arrangements enable us to support exploration and development in the Paleogene, share development costs and maximize synergies allowing us to manage and improve capital efficiency, as well as increase our focus on maximizing production at our existing operated hubs. |
| In the fourth quarter, BP began drilling operations on two wells, the Chevron operated Gibson prospect and the appraisal well on the Hopkins discovery. Both wells will complete in 2016. |
| In March we incurred drilling rig contract cancellation costs of $375 million for two deepwater drilling rigs in the Gulf of Mexico which are no longer required for our operations. |
| In November BP and its partners in the Mad Dog Phase 2 project (BP 60.5%) approved a modified development plan and were awarded a Suspension of Production from the US Department of the Interior. Mad Dog Phase 2 will develop resources in the central area of the field through a subsea development consisting of up to 24 wells from four drill centres. |
| In December we wrote off $345 million relating to costs for the Gila discovery as these resources would be challenging to develop in the current environment. |
| See also Significant estimate or judgement: oil and natural gas accounting on page 109 for further information on leases. |
| See page 30 for further information on our Thunder Horse South Expansion project. |
* Defined on page 256. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 221 |
The US Lower 48 onshore business has significant activities across six states producing natural gas, oil, NGLs and condensate. It is organized into five, geographic business units, and has a resource base that is mainly in unconventional reservoirs * (tight gas * , shale gas and coalbed methane). This resource spans 5.4 million gross developed acres (3.1 million net) and has approximately 9,000 operated gross wells, with daily net production around 280mboe/d.
Our US Lower 48 onshore business began operating as a separate business in 2015. While remaining part of our Upstream segment, it has its own governance, processes and systems and is designed to increase competitive performance through swift decision making and innovation, while maintaining BPs commitment to safe, reliable and compliant operations.
| In December the US Lower 48 onshore business expanded its San Juan basin operations by acquiring all of Devon Energys assets in the region. The bulk of the acquired assets, which span northern New Mexico and southern Colorado, consist of Devons operated interest in the Northeast Blanco Unit. |
For further information on the use of hydraulic fracturing in our shale gas assets see page 47. BPs onshore US crude oil and product pipelines and related transportation assets are included in the Downstream segment.
In Alaska BP operated nine North Slope oilfields in the Greater Prudhoe Bay area at the end of 2015. Our focus continues to be safe and reliable operations, renewing BPs Alaska North Slope infrastructure and minimizing oil production decline. Infrastructure renewal activities in 2015 included fire and gas system upgrades, safety system upgrades, pipeline renewal and facility siting projects. Production decline is being managed through annual drilling programmes and rig and non-rig well work programmes. BP also owns significant interests in six producing fields operated by others, as well as significant non-operating interests in the Point Thomson development project and the Liberty prospect.
| Development of the Point Thomson production facility continued in 2015. Construction of field infrastructure and fabrication of the four main process modules is progressing on schedule. The project is on track to commence production in early 2016. BP holds a 32% working interest in the field and ExxonMobil is the operator. |
| BP continued to work jointly with ExxonMobil, ConocoPhillips and the State of Alaska throughout 2015 to advance the Alaska LNG project. The project concept includes a North Slope gas treatment plant, an approximately 800-mile pipeline to tidewater and a three-train liquefaction facility, with an estimated capacity of 3bcf/d (up to 20 million tonnes per annum). In June 2014 the Alaska LNG co-venturers, including the State of Alaska, executed commercial agreements and launched the pre-front-end engineering and design (pre-FEED) phase of the project, which is expected to extend through 2016 with a gross spend of more than $500 million. In March, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued a Notice of Intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for the Alaska LNG project. In May 2015 the US Department of Energy conditionally authorized the export of Alaska LNG to non-Free Trade Agreement countries. In October and November the co-venturers received approval from the Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation Commission for gas offtake from the Prudhoe Bay and Point Thomson fields respectively sufficient to underpin gas export. A decision point for progressing to the front-end engineering and design (FEED) phase of the project will be reached in 2017 after completion of the pre-FEED phase. First commercial gas is planned between 2023 and 2025. |
| In December, a number of Alaska assets were subject to impairment charges totalling $194 million, primarily as a result of the lower price environment. |
BP owns a 49% interest in the Trans-Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS). TAPS transports crude oil from Prudhoe Bay on the Alaska North Slope to the port of Valdez in south-east Alaska. In April 2012 the two non-controlling owners of TAPS, Koch (3.08%) and Unocal (1.37%) gave notice to BP, ExxonMobil (21.1%) and ConocoPhillips (29.1%) of their intention to withdraw as owners of TAPS. The transfer of Kochs interest to the remaining owners was completed in 2012. The remaining owners and Unocal have not yet reached agreement regarding the terms for the transfer of Unocals interest in TAPS and related litigation will continue in 2016.
| In November 2015, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued an order addressing the TAPS tariff rate filings for years 2009 and |
2010. The decision will result in an increase in BPs production tax and royalty liabilities to the State of Alaska, retroactively from 2009 onwards. |
In Canada, BP is currently focused on oil sands development using in-situ steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) technology, which uses the injection of steam into the reservoir to warm the bitumen so that it can flow to the surface through producing wells. We hold interests in three oil sands leases through the Sunrise Oil Sands and Terre de Grace partnerships and the Pike Oil Sands joint operation * . In addition, we have significant offshore exploration interests in the Canadian Beaufort Sea, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland.
| Following the start of steam generation at the Sunrise Phase 1 in-situ oil sands project in Alberta (BP 50%) in December 2014, oil production began in March. Production is expected to ramp-up to full capacity of 60,000 barrels per day (gross) in 2017. |
| BP completed processing seismic data acquired offshore Nova Scotia at the end of 2015. We and our partners Hess (40%) and Woodside (20%) are planning to choose potential exploration well locations in 2016 and, pending regulatory approval, begin the first exploration drilling programme. |
| In partnership with Statoil and ExxonMobil, BP was a successful bidder for exploration licences in the Flemish Pass Basin offshore Newfoundland. Statoil will operate all three licences, and ExxonMobil will participate in two licences as a partner. The licences have an effective date of 15 January 2016. BP has a 33% share in the NL15-01-06 and NL15-01-07 licences and a 50% share in the NL15-01-08 licence. |
South America
BP has upstream activities in Brazil and Trinidad & Tobago, as well as in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile through an equity-accounted joint venture * .
In Brazil BP has interests in 21 exploration concessions across five basins.
| We continued appraisal of the Itaipu discovery, located in the deepwater sector of the Campos basin offshore Brazil in block BM-C-32, in line with the appraisal plan approved by the Brazilian National Petroleum Agency (ANP) in 2015. In October BP and its partner Anadarko submitted an application to ANP to transfer operatorship from BP to Anadarko. This will achieve significant efficiencies in progressing the development of this and an adjacent block, BM-C-30 (Wahoo), where Anadarko is the operator. Also in October, an extension request was filed with the ANP for three additional years for each of Itaipu and Wahoo to progress appraisal activities. |
| In May we received final approval from ANP for the previously signed agreement with Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) to farm in to five deepwater exploration blocks in Potiguar basin. The blocks are located in the Brazilian equatorial margin and cover an area of 3,837km 2 . The Pitu-2 well was completed during the year and proved the presence of oil. |
| After disappointing exploration results in October, BP and Petrobras submitted an application to ANP to relinquish their interest in BM-CE-2 block in Ceara basin. |
| During the year we progressed the preparatory activities for drilling exploration wells in the Foz de Amazonas and Barrerinhas blocks acquired in May 2013. |
| We continued discussions with the operators of blocks BM-C-35 and BC-2, Petrobras and Total respectively, to define the optimal appraisal of these blocks in the South Campos basin. |
In May we notified the Uruguayan oil and gas regulator, ANCAP, that interpretation of seismic data acquired over BP-operated blocks in Uruguay had not resulted in identification of viable prospects. As a result we relinquished our 100% interest in all the blocks in Uruguay and ANCAP approved this in February 2016.
In Argentina, Bolivia and Chile BP conducts activity through Pan American Energy LLC (PAE), an equity-accounted joint venture with Bridas Corporation, in which BP has a 60% interest. In September 2015 PAE sold its 50% interest in the Coiron licence in Chile. In addition, PAE has acquired a 60% working interest in the Hokchi production-sharing agreement * (PSA) in Mexico, effective from January 2016.
222 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
In Trinidad & Tobago BP holds exploration and production licences and PSAs covering 1.8 million acres offshore of the east and north-east coast. Facilities include 13 offshore platforms and two onshore processing facilities. Production comprises gas and associated liquids.
BP also has a shareholding in Atlantic LNG (ALNG), an LNG liquefication plant that averages 39% across four LNG trains * with a combined
capacity of 15 million tonnes per annum. BP sells gas to each of the LNG trains, supplying 100% of the gas for train 1, 50% for train 2, 75% for train 3 and around 67% of the gas for train 4. All LNG from train 1 and most of the LNG from trains 2 and 3 is sold to third parties in the US and Europe under long-term contracts. BPs remaining equity LNG entitlement from trains 2, 3 and 4 is marketed via BPs LNG marketing and trading function to markets in the US, UK, Spain and South America.
| Development of the Juniper project continues following its sanction in 2014. The lift and cellar decks are now completed. Fabrication of the jacket and subsea structures has commenced. The first two wells have been drilled and work in preparation for drilling the remaining three is complete. |
Africa
BPs upstream activities in Africa are located in Angola, Algeria, Libya, Egypt and Morocco.
In Angola BP is present in eight major deepwater licences offshore and is operator in four of these, blocks 18 and 31 that are producing oil and blocks 19 and 24 that are in the exploration phase. BP also has an equity interest in the Angola LNG plant (BP 13.6%).
| In April oil production started ahead of schedule at the Kizomba Satellites Phase-2 development in block 15 (BP 26.67%), offshore Angola. The project is a subsea infrastructure development of the Kakocha, Bavuca and Mondo South fields. Mondo South was the first to begin production, with the remaining two also starting up in 2015. This deepwater project is operated by a subsidiary of ExxonMobil. |
| Our Greater Plutonio Phase 3 project, in block 18, achieved first production from the subsea well, Pu-PQ, in the Plutonio reservoir in June six months ahead of schedule. The project is a subsea tie-in to the existing Greater Plutonio FPSO in a water depth of approximately 1,300 metres. BP is the operator with a 50% interest and Sonangol Sinopec International Limited has the remaining 50% interest. |
| On 21 July Total announced that they started production from Dalia Phase 1A, a new development on its offshore operated block 17 (BP 16.7%). The project involves drilling seven infill wells tied back to the Dalia FPSO. |
| Katambi-1, the first pre-salt play drilled by BP in the Benguela basin in block 24 discovered hydrocarbons. Technical and commercial evaluation of this is ongoing. |
| Pandora-1, the first pre-salt play drilled by BP in the Kwanza basin in block 19 also discovered hydrocarbons but will require nearby developments to be potentially commercial. Due to the uncertainty BP wrote off the costs of the well and the associated block 19 licence ($336 million) in 2015. |
| The Angola LNG plant (BP 13.6%), which has been shut down for planned repairs since April 2014 is expected to fully restart in 2016. |
| In December, several fields in Angola were subject to impairment charges as a result of falling oil prices. In total, $1.2 billion was recognized, a significant portion of which relates to the Angola LNG plant and is reflected in equity accounted earnings. |
In Algeria BP, Sonatrach and Statoil are partners in the In Salah (BP 33.15%) and In Amenas (BP 45.89%) projects that supply gas to the domestic and European markets. BPs total assets in Algeria at 31 December 2015 were $1,625 million ($310 million current and $1,315 million non-current).
| The Bourarhat agreement expired in September 2014 and talks with Sonatrach to negotiate new terms were not successful. Discussions with them to close out the project were initiated in the first half of 2015 and are ongoing. |
| In February 2016 the In Salah Southern Fields project start-up was announced. The project is the latest stage in the development of the In Salah Gas joint venture, which commenced production in 2004. The projects scope includes a new 500mmscfd gas dehydration central processing facility, brownfield modifications to existing processing facilities, 150km of carbon steel export pipelines, 160km of infield flowlines and the drilling and tie in of 26 new wells. |
In Libya we partner with the Libyan Investment Authority (LIA) in an exploration and production-sharing agreement (EPSA) to explore acreage in the onshore Ghadames and offshore Sirt basins (BP 85%). BP served the National Oil Corporation with notices of force majeure in August 2014. This is the result of continued civil unrest in Libya which has made it impossible for BP to undertake its obligations under the EPSA safely and securely. As a result of this uncertainty, balances associated with Libya were written off in 2015, incurring an exploration write-off of $432 million and other charges of $166 million.
In Egypt BP and its partners currently produce 10% of Egypts liquids production and almost 30% of its gas production. BPs total assets at 31 December 2015 were $7,860 million, of which $1,739 million were current and $6,121 million were non-current. The current assets include trade receivables and Egyptian pound-denominated cash.
| In March BP announced a gas discovery in the North Damietta offshore concession in the East Nile Delta at the Atoll-1 Deepwater exploration well (BP 100%). A Heads of Agreement was signed with the Egyptian government in November securing gas prices and key terms for the acceleration of Atoll development, with an estimated investment of around $900 million for the development of phase 1 of the project. |
| BP signed final agreements for the development of two West Nile Delta projects Taurus/Libra and Giza/Fayoum/Raven (BP 82.75%). Production from West Nile Delta is expected to start in 2017. |
| The West Nile Delta project concessions amendment, approved by the Egyptian cabinet in December 2014, was ratified in March 2015 and will be submitted to Parliament. The amendments agree a new development plan along with associated start-up dates. |
| In May BP signed a sales and purchase agreement with DEA Deutsche Erdoel AG under which BP increased its working interest in the West Nile Delta project concessions from 60% in North Alexandria Concession and 80% in West Mediterranean Deep Water Concession to 82.75% in both concessions. The transaction completed in December. |
| In August BP announced a further gas discovery at the Nooros prospect (BP 25%), located in the Abu Madi West concession in the Nile Delta in Egypt, operated by Eni. |
| In October BP was awarded three new exploration blocks in the Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company 2015 bid round. The blocks are North El Tabya (BP 100%), North Ras El Esh (BP 50%) and North El Hammad (BP 37.5%). We and our partners have committed to investing over $200 million in the blocks across various phases. |
In Morocco, BP has a non-operating interest in each of the Essaouira Offshore (BP 45%), Foum Assaka Offshore (BP 26.325%) and Tarhazoute Offshore (BP 45%) blocks in the Agadir Basin, offshore
Morocco. The exploration periods run until 2017.
Asia
BP has activities in Western Indonesia, China, Azerbaijan, Oman, Abu Dhabi, India, Iraq and Russia.
In Western Indonesia, BP participates in LNG exports through our interest in Virginia Indonesia Company LLC (VICO), the operator of Sanga-Sanga PSA (BP 38%) supplying gas to the Bontang LNG plant in Kalimantan. Sanga-Sanga currently delivers around 13% of the total gas feed to Bontang, Indonesias largest LNG export facility and one of the worlds largest LNG plants. It has a capacity of 22 million tonnes of LNG per annum and an output of more than 13 million tonnes.
In addition, BP participates in the Sanga-Sanga CBM PSA, where our working interest increased from 38% to 50% in January following withdrawal of Japan CBM Limited and Opicoil Energy at the end of 2014 and pending the Indonesian governments approval.
BP also exited the Tanjung IV PSA (BP 44%) in the Barito basin of Central Kalimantan in 2015, in accordance with the PSA and with government approval.
In China BP has a 30% equity stake in the 6.8 million tonnes per annum capacity Guangdong LNG regasification and pipeline project, making it the first foreign partner in Chinas LNG import business. The terminal is supplied under a long-term contract with Australias North West Shelf venture (BP 16.67%).
In Azerbaijan, BP operates two PSAs, Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli (ACG) (BP 35.8%) and Shah Deniz (BP 28.83%) and also holds other exploration leases.
* Defined on page 256. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 223 |
| In 2012 further EU and US regulations concerning restrictive measures against Iran were issued. The Shah Deniz joint operation and its gas marketing and pipeline entities, in which Naftiran Intertrade Co Ltd (NICO) has an interest, were excluded from the main operative provisions of the EU regulations, and from the application of the new US sanctions, as they fall within the exception for certain natural gas projects under Section 603 of the US Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012. The Shah Deniz Stage 2 project is also excluded from the EU and US sanctions. For further information see International trade sanctions on page 242. |
| In April we received final ratification by the government of Azerbaijan on the new PSA with the State Oil Company of the Republic of Azerbaijan, signed in December 2014, to jointly explore for and develop potential prospects in the shallow water area around the Absheron peninsula. |
| The Shah Deniz Stage 2 project continues to move ahead with a number of milestones achieved ahead of schedule. The Shah Deniz Stage 2 project is now more than 50% complete in terms of engineering, procurement and construction, and remains on target for first gas in 2018. |
BP holds a 30.1% interest in and operates the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) oil pipeline. The 1,768 kilometre pipeline transports oil from the BP-operated ACG oilfield and gas condensate from the Shah Deniz gas field in the Caspian Sea, along with other third-party oil, to the eastern Mediterranean port of Ceyhan. The BTC pipeline has a capacity of 1mmboe/d with average throughput in 2015 of 716.7mboe/d.
BP is technical operator of, and currently holds a 28.83% interest in, the 693 kilometre South Caucasus Pipeline (SCP). The pipeline takes gas from Azerbaijan through Georgia to the Turkish border and has a capacity of 134mboe/d with average throughput in 2015 of 113.2mboe/d. BP (as operator of Azerbaijan International Operating Company) also operates the Western Export Route Pipeline that transports ACG oil to Supsa on the Black Sea coast of Georgia, with average throughput of 86mboe/d in 2015.
In April BP became a shareholder in the Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline (TANAP), and now holds a 12% equity share in the project. TANAP is a central part of the Southern Corridor pipeline system that will transport gas from the Shah Deniz field in Azerbaijan to markets in Turkey, Greece, Bulgaria and Italy.
In Oman, BP is continuing with development activity on the BP-operated Khazzan field in block 61 (BP 60%).
| By the end of 2015 10 rigs were operational, drilling the development wells at Khazzan. The project is more than 40% complete and work continues on the central processing facility and the associated infrastructure. Gas production is expected to start in late 2017. |
| In February 2016 BP announced it had signed a heads of agreement with the government of the Sultanate of Oman to amend the block 61 EPSA, extending the licence area of the block and enabling further development of the Khazzan field. |
In Abu Dhabi, we have an equity interest of 14.67% in an offshore concession. We also have a 10% equity shareholding in the Abu Dhabi Gas Liquefaction Company that supplied 5.7 million tonnes of LNG (295.7bcfe regasified) in 2015.
In India, we have a 30% interest in four oil and gas PSAs operated by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL), and partner with RIL in a 50:50 joint operation for the gas sourcing and marketing in India.
| In 2015 a number of activities to sustain production and extend the life of the producing fields in KG D6 block were completed. These included well side-tracks, the installation of additional onshore compression, reactivation of shut-in wells and production optimization. |
| We also undertook successful tests of three earlier discoveries; two in the KG D6 block and one in the NEC 25 block to progress towards Declaration of Commerciality. |
| We continue to expect further clarity on the gas price policy to emerge in due course. |
In Iraq, BP holds a 47.6% working interest and is the lead contractor in the Rumaila technical service contract in Southern Iraq. Rumaila is one of the worlds largest oil fields, comprising five producing reservoirs. BPs total assets in Iraq at 31 December 2015 were $1,707 million ($1,281 million current and $426 million non-current). BP has undertaken studies with the government of Iraq and North Oil Company in support of the stabilization and redevelopment of two producing reservoirs in the Kirkuk field. Access to the Kirkuk field in 2015 was restricted due to the
security situation and the term of the agreement expired at the end of 2015. BP is entitled to recover all costs incurred to that date. Despite instability and sectarian violence in the north and west of the country, BP operations continued as planned in the south.
In Russia, we acquired a 20% participatory interest in a Rosneft subsidiary, Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha, in 2015, that will further develop the Srednebotuobinskoye oil and gas condensate field in East Siberia. Related to this, Rosneft and BP will jointly undertake exploration in an adjacent area of mutual interest.
Rosneft and BP have also agreed to jointly explore two additional areas of mutual interest in the prolific West Siberian and Yenisey-Khatanga basins where they will jointly appraise the Baikalovskoye discovery subject to receipt of all relevant consents. This is in addition to the exploration agreement announced in 2014 for an area of mutual interest in the Volga-Urals region of Russia where Rosneft and BP have commenced joint study work to assess potential non-shale, unconventional tight-oil * exploration projects (see Rosneft on page 38).
Australasia
We are active in Australia and Eastern Indonesia.
In Australia BP is one of seven participants in the North West Shelf (NWS) venture, which has been producing LNG, pipeline gas, condensate, LPG and oil since the 1980s. Six partners (including BP) hold an equal 16.67% interest in the gas infrastructure and an equal 15.78% interest in the gas and condensate reserves, with a seventh partner owning the remaining 5.32%. BP also has a 16.67% interest in some of the NWS oil reserves and related infrastructure. The NWS venture is currently the principal supplier to the domestic market in Western Australia and one of the largest LNG export projects in the region, with five LNG trains in operation. BPs net share of the capacity of NWS LNG trains 1-5 is 2.7 million tonnes of LNG per annum.
BP also holds a 5.375% interest in the Jansz-lo field and 12.5% interests in the Geryon, Orthrus, Maenad, Urania and Eurytion fields which are part of the Greater Gorgon project. BPs Jansz-Io interest is in the reserves and wells which will provide the initial feed gas to the Gorgon LNG plant, scheduled to commence production in early 2016.
BP holds a 70% interest in four deepwater offshore exploration blocks in the Ceduna Sub Basin in the Great Australian Bight off the coast of southern Australia. BP, as operator, expects drilling to commence in late 2016 in this frontier exploration basin. It is also one of five participants in
the Browse LNG venture (operated by Woodside) and holds a 17% interest.
| The Browse joint operation partners agreed to enter FEED for an offshore floating LNG concept in June. The proposed development remains subject to regulatory, joint venture and internal BP approvals. |
| In October the Western Flank A project (BP 16.67%) in offshore Western Australia began production. The Western Flank A project is the first of a series of subsea tie-back projects that have been undertaken to extend the production plateau and supply additional gas to the NWSs five existing LNG trains and domestic gas plant. The project is operated by Woodside. |
| The Persephone project (BP 16.67%) is the second of the NWS series of subsea tie-back projects and is on schedule to deliver first gas in the second half of 2017. |
In Eastern Indonesia, BP operates the Tangguh LNG plant. Tangguh (BP 37.16%), is located in Papua Barat. The asset comprises 14 producing wells, two offshore platforms, two pipelines and an LNG plant with two production trains. It has a total capacity of 7.6 million tonnes of LNG per annum. Tangguh supplies LNG to customers in Indonesia, China, South Korea, Mexico and Japan through a combination of long, medium and short-term contracts. Plans for a third train, the Tangguh expansion project, remain on track, with first production expected in 2020.
| The Tangguh expansion project is progressing, with completion of dual onshore FEED to two separate consortia on the third LNG train during 2015. Marketing on the third train capacity continues, with 65% of the volumes already contracted. |
BP has 100% interests in two deepwater PSAs, West Aru I and II, and 32% interests in the Chevron-operated West Papua I and Ill PSAs. These PSAs will be relinquished pending approval from the government of Indonesia.
224 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
The following table summarizes BP groups interests in refineries and average daily crude distillation capacities as at 31 December 2015.
a | Crude distillation capacity is gross rated capacity, which is defined as the highest average sustained unit rate for a consecutive 30-day period. |
b | BP share of equity, which is not necessarily the same as BP share of processing entitlements. |
c | Indicates refineries not operated by BP. |
* Defined on page 256. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 225 |
Petrochemicals production capacity a
The following table summarizes BP groups share of petrochemicals production capacities as at 31 December 2015.
BP share of capacity
thousand tonnes per annum b |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Product | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Geographical area | Site |
Group interest (%) c |
PTA | PX |
Acetic acid |
Olefins and derivatives |
Others | |||||||||||||||||||||
US |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cooper River |
100.0 | 1,300 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Decatur d |
100.0 | 1,000 | 700 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Texas City |
100.0 | | 900 | 600 | e | | 100 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2,300 | 1,600 | 600 | | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Hull d | 100.0 | | | 500 | | 200 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Belgium |
Geel | 100.0 | 1,300 | 700 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Germany |
Gelsenkirchen f | 50-61.0 | | | | 1,800 | g | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Mülheim f |
50.0 | | | | | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
1,300 | 700 | 500 | 1,800 | 300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rest of world |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trinidad & Tobago |
Point Lisas | 36.9 | | | | | 700 | |||||||||||||||||||||
China |
Caojing | 50.0 | | | | 3,500 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Chongqing |
51.0 | | | 200 | | 100 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Nanjing |
50.0 | | | 300 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Zhuhai h |
85.0 | 2,400 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Indonesia |
Merak | 100.0 | 500 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
South Korea |
Ulsan | 34-51.0 | | | 300 | g | | 100 | g | |||||||||||||||||||
Malaysia |
Kertih | 70.0 | | | 400 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Taiwan |
Mai Liao | 50.0 | | | 200 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Taichung |
61.4 | 500 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
3,400 | | 1,400 | 3,500 | 900 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
7,000 | 2,300 | 2,500 | 5,300 | 1,300 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total BP share of capacity at 31 December 2015 |
18,400 |
a | Petrochemicals production capacity is the proven maximum sustainable daily rate (MSDR) multiplied by the number of days in the respective period, where MSDR is the highest average daily rate ever achieved over a sustained period. |
b | Capacities are shown to the nearest hundred thousand tonnes per annum. |
c | Includes BP share of equity-accounted entities, as indicated. |
d | These sites have capacity under 100,000 tonnes per annum for a speciality product (e.g. naphthalene dicarboxylate and ethylidene diacetate). In January 2016 we announced the sale of the Decatur, US petrochemicals complex. |
e | Group interest is quoted at 100%, reflecting the capacity entitlement, which is marketed by BP. |
f | Due to the integrated nature of these plants with our Gelsenkirchen refinery, the income and expenditure of these plants is managed and reported through the fuels business. |
g | Group interest varies by product. |
h | BP Zhuhai Chemical Company Ltd is a subsidiary * of BP, the capacity of which is shown above at 100%. |
226 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Oil and gas disclosures for the group
Resource progression
BP manages its hydrocarbon resources in three major categories: prospect inventory, contingent resources and reserves. When a discovery is made, volumes usually transfer from the prospect inventory to the contingent resources category. The contingent resources move through various sub-categories as their technical and commercial maturity increases through appraisal activity.
At the point of final investment decision, most proved reserves will be categorized as proved undeveloped (PUD). Volumes will subsequently be recategorized from PUD to proved developed (PD) as a consequence of development activity. When part of a wells proved reserves depends on a later phase of activity, only that portion of proved reserves associated with existing, available facilities and infrastructure moves to PD. The first PD bookings will typically occur at the point of first oil or gas production. Major development projects typically take one to five years from the time of initial booking of PUD to the start of production. Changes to proved reserves bookings may be made due to analysis of new or existing data concerning production, reservoir performance, commercial factors and additional reservoir development activity.
Volumes can also be added or removed from our portfolio through acquisition or divestment of properties and projects. When we dispose of an interest in a property or project, the volumes associated with our adopted plan of development for which we have a final investment decision will be removed from our proved reserves upon completion. When we acquire an interest in a property or project, the volumes associated with the existing development and any committed projects will be added to our proved reserves if BP has made a final investment decision and they satisfy the SECs criteria for attribution of proved status. Following the acquisition, additional volumes may be progressed to proved reserves from non-proved reserves or contingent resources.
Non-proved reserves and contingent resources in a field will only be recategorized as proved reserves when all the criteria for attribution of proved status have been met and the volumes are included in the business plan and scheduled for development, typically within five years. BP will only book proved reserves where development is scheduled to commence after more than five years, if these proved reserves satisfy the SECs criteria for attribution of proved status and BP management has reasonable certainty that these proved reserves will be produced.
At the end of 2015 BP had material volumes of proved undeveloped reserves held for more than five years in Trinidad, the North Sea and the Gulf of Mexico. These are part of ongoing infrastructure-led development activities for which BP has a historical track record of completing comparable projects in these countries. We have no proved undeveloped reserves held for more than five years in our onshore US developments.
In each case the volumes are being progressed as part of an adopted development plan where there are physical limits to the development timing such as infrastructure limitations, contractual limits including gas delivery commitments, late life compression and the complex nature of working in remote locations.
Over the past five years, BP has annually progressed a weighted average 18% of our group proved undeveloped reserves (including the impact of disposals and price acceleration effects in PSAs) to proved developed reserves. This equates to a turnover time of about five and a half years. We expect the turnover time to remain near this level and anticipate the volume of proved undeveloped reserves held for more than five years to remain about the same.
In 2015 we progressed 959mmboe of proved undeveloped reserves (626mmboe for our subsidiaries alone) to proved developed reserves through ongoing investment in our subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities upstream development activities. Total development expenditure, excluding midstream activities, was $16,731 million in 2015 ($13,458 million for subsidiaries and $3,273 million for equity-accounted entities). The major areas with progressed volumes in 2015 were Angola, Azerbaijan, Russia, UK and US. Revisions of previous estimates for proved undeveloped reserves are due to changes relating to field performance, well results or changes in commercial conditions including price impacts. The following tables describe the changes to our proved undeveloped reserves position through the year for our subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities and for our subsidiaries alone.
Subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities | volumes in mmboe a | |||
Proved undeveloped reserves at 1 January 2015 |
7,788 | |||
Revisions of previous estimates |
300 | |||
Improved recovery |
111 | |||
Discoveries and extensions |
339 | |||
Purchases |
126 | |||
Sales |
(17 | ) | ||
Total in year proved undeveloped reserves changes |
8,646 | |||
Progressed to proved developed reserves |
(959 | ) | ||
Proved undeveloped reserves at 31 December 2015 |
7,687 | |||
Subsidiaries only | volumes in mmboe a | |||
Proved undeveloped reserves at 1 January 2015 |
4,507 | |||
Revisions of previous estimates |
61 | |||
Improved recovery |
106 | |||
Discoveries and extensions |
79 | |||
Purchases |
101 | |||
Sales |
(17 | ) | ||
Total in year proved undeveloped reserves changes |
4,837 | |||
Progressed to proved developed reserves |
(626 | ) | ||
Proved undeveloped reserves at 31 December 2015 |
4,211 |
a | Because of rounding, some totals may not agree exactly with the sum of their component parts. |
BP bases its proved reserves estimates on the requirement of reasonable certainty with rigorous technical and commercial assessments based on conventional industry practice and regulatory requirements. BP only applies technologies that have been field tested and have been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation. BP applies high-resolution seismic data for the identification of reservoir extent and fluid contacts only where there is an overwhelming track record of success in its local application. In certain cases BP uses numerical simulation as part of a holistic assessment of recovery factor for its fields, where these simulations have been field tested and have been demonstrated to provide reasonably certain results with consistency and repeatability in the formation being evaluated or in an analogous formation. In certain deepwater fields BP has booked proved reserves before production flow tests are conducted, in part because of the significant safety, cost and environmental implications of conducting these tests. The industry has made substantial technological improvements in understanding, measuring and delineating reservoir properties without the need for flow tests. To determine reasonable certainty of commercial recovery, BP employs a general method of reserves assessment that relies on the integration of three types of data:
1. | Well data used to assess the local characteristics and conditions of reservoirs and fluids. |
2. | Field scale seismic data to allow the interpolation and extrapolation of these characteristics outside the immediate area of the local well control. |
3. | Data from relevant analogous fields. |
Well data includes appraisal wells or sidetrack holes, full logging suites, core data and fluid samples. BP considers the integration of this data in certain cases to be superior to a flow test in providing understanding of overall reservoir performance. The collection of data from logs, cores, wireline formation testers, pressures and fluid samples calibrated to each other and to the seismic data can allow reservoir properties to be determined over a greater volume than the localized volume of investigation associated with a short-term flow test. There is a strong track record of proved reserves recorded using these methods, validated by actual production levels.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 227 |
Governance
BPs centrally controlled process for proved reserves estimation approval forms part of a holistic and integrated system of internal control. It consists of the following elements:
| Accountabilities of certain officers of the group to ensure that there is review and approval of proved reserves bookings independent of the operating business and that there are effective controls in the approval process and verification that the proved reserves estimates and the related financial impacts are reported in a timely manner. |
| Capital allocation processes, whereby delegated authority is exercised to commit to capital projects that are consistent with the delivery of the groups business plan. A formal review process exists to ensure that both technical and commercial criteria are met prior to the commitment of capital to projects. |
| Group audit, whose role is to consider whether the groups system of internal control is adequately designed and operating effectively to respond appropriately to the risks that are significant to BP. |
| Approval hierarchy, whereby proved reserves changes above certain threshold volumes require immediate review and all proved reserves require annual central authorization and have scheduled periodic reviews. The frequency of periodic review ensures that 100% of the BP proved reserves base undergoes central review every three years. |
BPs vice president of segment reserves is the petroleum engineer primarily responsible for overseeing the preparation of the reserves estimate. He has more than 30 years of diversified industry experience with more than 10 years spent managing the governance and compliance of BPs reserves estimation. He is a past member of the Society of Petroleum Engineers Oil and Gas Reserves Committee and of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists Committee on Resource Evaluation and is the current chair of the bureau of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Expert Group on Resource Classification.
No specific portion of compensation bonuses for senior management is directly related to proved reserves targets. Additions to proved reserves is one of several indicators by which the performance of the Upstream segment is assessed by the remuneration committee for the purposes of determining compensation bonuses for the executive directors. Other indicators include a number of financial and operational measures.
BPs variable pay programme for the other senior managers in the Upstream segment is based on individual performance contracts. Individual performance contracts are based on agreed items from the business performance plan, one of which, if chosen, could relate to proved reserves.
Compliance
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) do not provide specific guidance on reserves disclosures. BP estimates proved reserves in accordance with SEC Rule 4-10 (a) of Regulation S-X and relevant Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DI) and Staff Accounting Bulletins as issued by the SEC staff.
By their nature, there is always some risk involved in the ultimate development and production of proved reserves including, but not limited to: final regulatory approval; the installation of new or additional infrastructure, as well as changes in oil and gas prices; changes in operating and development costs; and the continued availability of additional development capital. All the groups proved reserves held in subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities with the exception of those proved reserves held by our Russian equity-accounted entity, Rosneft, are estimated by the groups petroleum engineers.
DeGolyer & MacNaughton (D&M), an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm, has estimated the net proved crude oil, condensate, natural gas liquids (NGLs) and natural gas reserves, as of 31 December 2015, of certain properties owned by Rosneft as part of our equity-accounted proved reserves. The properties evaluated by D&M account for 100% of Rosnefts net proved reserves as of 31 December 2015. The net proved reserves estimates prepared by D&M were prepared in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rule 4-10(a)(1)-(32) of Regulation S-X. All reserves estimates involve
some degree of uncertainty. BP has filed D&Ms independent report on its reserves estimates as an exhibit to its Annual Report on Form 20-F filed with the SEC.
Our proved reserves are associated with both concessions (tax and royalty arrangements) and agreements where the group is exposed to the upstream risks and rewards of ownership, but where our entitlement to the hydrocarbons is calculated using a more complex formula, such as with PSAs. In a concession, the consortium of which we are a part is entitled to the proved reserves that can be produced over the licence period, which may be the life of the field. In a PSA, we are entitled to recover volumes that equate to costs incurred to develop and produce the proved reserves and an agreed share of the remaining volumes or the economic equivalent. As part of our entitlement is driven by the monetary amount of costs to be recovered, price fluctuations will have an impact on both production volumes and reserves.
We disclose our share of proved reserves held in equity-accounted entities (joint ventures * and associates * ), although we do not control these entities or the assets held by such entities.
BPs estimated net proved reserves and proved reserves replacement
Eighty-four per cent of our total proved reserves of subsidiaries at 31 December 2015 were held through joint operations * (84% in 2014), and 34% of the proved reserves were held through such joint operations where we were not the operator (33% in 2014).
Estimated net proved reserves of crude oil at 31 December 2015 a b c
million barrels | ||||||||||||
Developed | Undeveloped | Total | ||||||||||
UK |
141 | 298 | 440 | |||||||||
Rest of Europe |
86 | 19 | 106 | |||||||||
US |
890 | 577 | 1,467 | |||||||||
Rest of North America |
46 | 205 | 252 | |||||||||
South America |
8 | 18 | 26 | |||||||||
Africa |
340 | 89 | 429 | |||||||||
Rest of Asia |
598 | 192 | 790 | |||||||||
Australasia |
35 | 16 | 51 | |||||||||
Subsidiaries * |
2,146 | 1,414 | 3,560 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities |
3,225 | 2,292 | 5,517 | |||||||||
Total |
5,371 | 3,707 | 9,078 |
Estimated net proved reserves of natural gas liquids at 31 December 2015 a b
million barrels | ||||||||||||
Developed | Undeveloped | Total | ||||||||||
UK |
5 | 4 | 10 | |||||||||
Rest of Europe |
11 | 1 | 12 | |||||||||
US |
269 | 70 | 339 | |||||||||
Rest of North America |
| | | |||||||||
South America |
7 | 28 | 35 | |||||||||
Africa |
5 | 10 | 15 | |||||||||
Rest of Asia |
| | | |||||||||
Australasia |
9 | 2 | 12 | |||||||||
Subsidiaries |
308 | 115 | 422 | |||||||||
Equity-accounted entities |
45 | 15 | 60 | |||||||||
Total |
352 | 130 | 482 | |||||||||
Estimated net proved reserves of liquids * | ||||||||||||
million barrels | ||||||||||||
Developed | Undeveloped | Total | ||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
2,453 | 1,529 | 3,982 | d e | ||||||||
Equity-accounted entities |
3,270 | 2,307 | 5,577 | f | ||||||||
Total |
5,723 | 3,836 | 9,560 |
228 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Estimated net proved reserves of natural gas at 31 December 2015 a b
a | Proved reserves exclude royalties due to others, whether payable in cash or in kind, where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently, and include non-controlling interests in consolidated operations. We disclose our share of reserves held in joint ventures and associates that are accounted for by the equity method although we do not control these entities or the assets held by such entities. |
b | The 2015 marker prices used were Brent * $54.17/bbl (2014 $101.27/bbl and 2013 $108.02/bbl) and Henry Hub * $2.59/mmBtu (2014 $4.31/mmBtu and 2013 $3.66/mmBtu). |
c | Includes condensate and bitumen which are not material. |
d | Proved reserves in the Prudhoe Bay field in Alaska include an estimated 23 million barrels on which a net profits royalty will be payable over the life of the field under the terms of the BP Prudhoe Bay Royalty Trust. |
e | Includes 19 million barrels of liquids in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
f | Includes 70 million barrels of crude oil in respect of the 1.27% non-controlling interest in Rosneft held assets in Russia including 28 million barrels held through BPs equity-accounted interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha. |
g | Includes 2,359 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 30% non-controlling interest in BP Trinidad and Tobago LLC. |
h | Includes 129 billion cubic feet of natural gas in respect of the 0.23% non-controlling interest in Rosneft held assets in Russia including 5 billion cubic feet held through BPs equity-accounted interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha. |
Because of rounding, some totals may not agree exactly with the sum of their component parts.
Proved reserves replacement
Total hydrocarbon proved reserves at 31 December 2015, on an oil equivalent basis including equity-accounted entities, decreased by 2% (decrease of 5% for subsidiaries and increase of 1% for equity-accounted entities) compared with 31 December 2014. Natural gas represented about 44% (57% for subsidiaries and 30% for equity-accounted entities) of these reserves. The change includes a net increase from acquisitions and disposals of 130mmboe (103mmboe within our subsidiaries and 28mmboe within our equity-accounted entities). Acquisition activity in our subsidiaries occurred in Egypt, Trinidad, the US and the UK, and divestment activity in our subsidiaries in Egypt, Trinidad, the US and the UK. In our equity-accounted entities the most significant item was a purchase in Russia.
The proved reserves replacement ratio is the extent to which production is replaced by proved reserves additions. This ratio is expressed in oil equivalent terms and includes changes resulting from revisions to previous estimates, improved recovery, and extensions and discoveries. For 2015, the proved reserves replacement ratio excluding acquisitions and disposals was 61% (63% in 2014 and 129% in 2013) for subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities, 28% for subsidiaries alone and 115% for equity-accounted entities alone. The ratio reflects lower reserves bookings as a result of a low number of final investment decisions adding new projects and reduced activity in Alaska and the US Lower 48. Lower prices impacted the reserves in a number of regions, but these were largely offset by increases in reserves in our PSAs. In some cases, cost recovery in PSAs may be limited by production or revenue caps.
In 2015 net additions to the groups proved reserves (excluding production and sales and purchases of reserves-in-place) amounted to 751mmboe (212mmboe for subsidiaries and 539mmboe for equity-accounted entities), through revisions to previous estimates, improved recovery from, and extensions to, existing fields and discoveries of new fields. The subsidiary additions through improved recovery from, and extensions to, existing fields and discoveries of new fields were in existing developments where they represented a mixture of proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves. Volumes added in 2015 principally resulted from the application of conventional technologies and increases in PSA entitlement as a result of lower prices. The principal proved reserves additions in our subsidiaries were in Angola, Azerbaijan, Canada, Egypt and Iraq. We had material reductions in our proved reserves in the US principally due to activity reduction and lower price. The principal reserves additions in our equity-accounted entities were in Argentina and Russia.
Sixteen per cent of our proved reserves are associated with PSAs. The countries in which we operated under PSAs in 2015 were Algeria, Angola, Azerbaijan, Egypt, India, Indonesia, Oman and a non-material volume of our proved reserves in Trinidad. In addition, the technical service contract (TSC) governing our investment in the Rumaila field in Iraq functions as a PSA.
Our Abu Dhabi offshore and Virginia Indonesia Company LLC (Western Indonesia) conventional concessions are due to expire in 2018. The group holds no other licences due to expire within the next three years that would have a significant impact on BPs reserves or production.
For further information on our reserves see page 176.
* Defined on page 256. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 229 |
BPs net production by country crude oil a and natural gas liquids
thousand barrels per day | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BP net share of production b | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 |
Crude oil 2013 |
2015 | 2014 |
Natural gas liquids 2013 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries UK c d |
72 | 46 | 58 | 7 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Norway |
38 | 41 | 31 | 5 | 5 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Rest of Europe |
38 | 41 | 31 | 5 | 5 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Europe | 110 | 87 | 89 | 11 | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Alaska c |
107 | 127 | 137 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lower 48 onshore c |
14 | 14 | 12 | 37 | 45 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gulf of Mexico deepwater c |
203 | 206 | 156 | 19 | 18 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total US |
323 | 347 | 305 | 56 | 63 | 58 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Canada |
3 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Rest of North America |
3 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total North America | 327 | 347 | 305 | 56 | 63 | 58 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Trinidad & Tobago c |
12 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Brazil c |
| | 7 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total South America | 12 | 13 | 17 | 11 | 12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Angola |
221 | 181 | 180 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Egypt c |
42 | 37 | 33 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Algeria |
6 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Africa | 270 | 222 | 217 | 7 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Azerbaijan c |
111 | 98 | 96 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Western Indonesia |
2 | 2 | 1 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Iraq |
123 | 55 | 39 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
1 | 2 | 4 | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Rest of Asia |
237 | 156 | 141 | 1 | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Asia | 237 | 156 | 141 | 1 | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Australia |
15 | 17 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
2 | 2 | 2 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Australasia | 17 | 19 | 21 | 3 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries | 971 | 844 | 789 | 88 | 91 | 86 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
TNK-BP (Russia, Venezuela, Vietnam) c e |
| | 183 | | | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Rosneft (Russia, Canada,Venezuela, Vietnam) c f |
809 | 816 | 643 | 4 | 5 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Abu Dhabi g |
96 | 97 | 231 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Argentina |
65 | 62 | 60 | 3 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bolivia |
4 | 3 | 2 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Egypt |
| | | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other c |
1 | 1 | 1 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total equity-accounted entities | 974 | 979 | 1,120 | 10 | 12 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities h | 1,946 | 1,823 | 1,909 | 99 | 104 | 105 |
a | Includes condensate and bitumen which are not material. |
b | Production excludes royalties due to others whether payable in cash or in kind where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
c | In 2015, BP acquired an interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha. It also increased its interest in the North Alexandria and West Mediterranean Deep Water Concessions of the West Nile Delta project in Egypt. It increased its interest in certain UK North Sea, Trinidad, and US onshore assets. It also decreased its interest in certain other assets in the same Regions. In 2014, BP divested its interests in the Endicott and Northstar fields, and 50% of its interests in the Milne Point field, in Alaska, its interest in the US onshore Hugoton upstream operation and its interest in the Polvo asset in Brazil. BP also reduced its interest in certain wells in the US onshore Eagle Ford Shale in south Texas. It increased its interest in the Shah Deniz asset in Azerbaijan, in certain UK North Sea assets, and in certain US onshore assets. In 2013, BP divested its interests in TNK-BP, its interests in the Harding, Devenick, Maclure, Braes and Braemar fields in the North Sea and its interests in the US onshore Moxa upstream operation in Wyoming. It also acquired an interest in Rosneft. |
d | Volumes relate to six BP-operated fields within ETAP. BP has no interests in the remaining three ETAP fields, which are operated by Shell. |
e | Estimated production for 2013 represents BPs share of TNK-BPs estimated production from 1 January to 20 March, averaged over the full year. |
f | 2015 is based on preliminary operational results of Rosneft for the three months ended 31 December 2015. Actual results may differ from these amounts. 2013 reflects production for the period 21 March to 31 December, averaged over the full year. |
g | BP holds interests, through associates, in offshore concessions in Abu Dhabi which expire in 2018. We also held onshore concessions which expired in 2014. |
h | Includes 4 net mboe/d of NGLs from processing plants in which BP has an interest (2014 7mboe/d and 2013 5.5mboe/d). |
Because of rounding, some totals may not agree exactly with the sum of their component parts.
230 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
BPs net production by country natural gas
million cubic feet per day | ||||||||||||||
BP net share of production a | ||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||
Subsidiaries UK b |
155 | 71 | 157 | |||||||||||
Norway |
111 | 102 | 80 | |||||||||||
Total Rest of Europe |
111 | 102 | 80 | |||||||||||
Total Europe | 266 | 173 | 237 | |||||||||||
Lower 48 onshore b |
1,353 | 1,350 | 1,404 | |||||||||||
Gulf of Mexico deepwater b |
168 | 159 | 114 | |||||||||||
Alaska |
7 | 11 | 21 | |||||||||||
Total US |
1,528 | 1,519 | 1,539 | |||||||||||
Canada |
10 | 10 | 11 | |||||||||||
Total Rest of North America |
10 | 10 | 11 | |||||||||||
Total North America | 1,538 | 1,529 | 1,551 | |||||||||||
Trinidad & Tobago b |
1,922 | 2,147 | 2,221 | |||||||||||
Total South America | 1,922 | 2,147 | 2,221 | |||||||||||
Egypt b |
402 | 406 | 444 | |||||||||||
Algeria |
187 | 107 | 117 | |||||||||||
Total Africa | 589 | 513 | 561 | |||||||||||
Azerbaijan b |
219 | 230 | 203 | |||||||||||
Western Indonesia |
48 | 47 | 51 | |||||||||||
India |
113 | 131 | 156 | |||||||||||
Other b |
| | 81 | |||||||||||
Total Rest of Asia |
380 | 408 | 490 | |||||||||||
Total Asia | 380 | 408 | 490 | |||||||||||
Australia |
447 | 450 | 431 | |||||||||||
Eastern Indonesia |
354 | 364 | 353 | |||||||||||
Total Australasia | 801 | 814 | 784 | |||||||||||
Total subsidiaries c | 5,495 | 5,585 | 5,845 | |||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities (BP share) |
||||||||||||||
TNK-BP (Russia, Venezuela, Vietnam) b d |
| | 184 | |||||||||||
Rosneft (Russia, Canada, Venezuela, Vietnam) b e |
1,195 | 1,084 | 617 | |||||||||||
Argentina |
341 | 323 | 329 | |||||||||||
Bolivia |
93 | 80 | 55 | |||||||||||
Other b |
21 | 28 | 30 | |||||||||||
Total equity-accounted entities c | 1,651 | 1,515 | 1,216 | |||||||||||
Total subsidiaries and equity-accounted entities | 7,146 | 7,100 | 7,060 |
a | Production excludes royalties due to others whether payable in cash or in kind where the royalty owner has a direct interest in the underlying production and the option and ability to make lifting and sales arrangements independently. |
b | In 2015, BP acquired an interest in Taas-Yuryakh Neftegazodobycha. It also increased its interest in the North Alexandria and West Mediterranean Deep Water Concessions of the West Nile Delta project in Egypt. It increased its interest in certain UK North Sea, Trinidad, and US onshore assets. It also decreased its interest in certain other assets in the same Regions. In 2014, BP divested its interest in the US onshore Hugoton upstream operation. BP also reduced its interest in certain wells in the US onshore Eagle Ford Shale in south Texas. It increased its interest in the Shah Deniz asset in Azerbaijan, in certain UK North Sea assets, and in certain US onshore assets. In 2013, BP divested its interests in TNK-BP, its interests in the Harding, Devenick, Maclure, Braes, Braemar and Sean fields in the North Sea, its interests in the US onshore Moxa upstream operation in Wyoming and its interests in the Yacheng gas field in the South China Sea. It also acquired an interest in Rosneft. |
c | Natural gas production volumes exclude gas consumed in operations within the lease boundaries of the producing field, but the related reserves are included in the groups reserves. |
d | Estimated production for 2013 represents BPs share of TNK-BPs estimated production from 1 January to 20 March, averaged over the full year. |
e | 2015 is based on preliminary operational results of Rosneft for the three months ended 31 December 2015. Actual results may differ from these amounts. 2013 reflects production for the period 21 March to 31 December, averaged over the full year. |
Because of rounding, some totals may not agree exactly with the sum of their component parts.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 231 |
The following tables provide additional data and disclosures in relation to our oil and gas operations.
Average sales price per unit of production a
$ per unit of production | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total group average |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of Europe |
US |
Rest of North America |
Russia b |
Rest of Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil c |
52.42 | 50.68 | 49.84 | 26.71 | 53.19 | 49.09 | | 41.41 | 50.64 | 47.78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
30.66 | 28.20 | 14.80 | | 27.66 | 31.94 | | | 36.69 | 20.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas |
7.83 | 6.49 | 2.10 | | 2.67 | 4.40 | | 5.35 | 7.35 | 3.80 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil c |
96.02 | 97.77 | 93.66 | | 96.85 | 93.99 | | 91.05 | 94.04 | 93.65 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
58.11 | 52.97 | 32.28 | | 41.62 | 53.67 | | | 65.70 | 36.15 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas |
8.13 | 8.22 | 3.80 | | 4.65 | 5.92 | | 6.28 | 11.20 | 5.70 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil c |
107.83 | 107.78 | 102.07 | | 106.37 | 107.02 | | 108.26 | 105.89 | 105.38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
62.53 | 61.82 | 30.95 | | 54.92 | 69.39 | | | 68.13 | 38.38 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas |
9.43 | 10.18 | 3.07 | | 4.66 | 5.75 | | 4.99 | 10.55 | 5.35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities d |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil c |
| | | | 54.24 | | 44.78 | 16.87 | | 41.49 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
| | | | 13.17 | | n/a | | | 13.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas |
| | | | 4.35 | | 1.48 | 7.56 | | 2.35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil c |
| | | | 73.87 | | 84.19 | 14.70 | | 72.53 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
| | | | 15.75 | | n/a | | | 15.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas |
| | | | 4.73 | | 2.18 | 12.83 | | 3.01 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crude oil c |
| | | | 74.01 | | 95.28 | 11.58 | | 63.51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas liquids |
| | | | 29.63 | | n/a | | | 29.63 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gas |
| | | | 4.05 | | 2.47 | 13.21 | | 3.26 |
a | Units of production are barrels for liquids and thousands of cubic feet for gas. Realizations * include transfers between businesses, except in the case of Russia. |
b | The operational and financial information of the Rosneft segment for 2015 is based on preliminary operational and financial results of Rosneft for the three months ended 31 December 2015. Actual results may differ from these amounts. Crude oil includes natural gas liquids. |
c | Includes condensate. 2015 for subsidiaries also includes bitumen. |
d | It is common for equity-accounted entities agreements to include pricing clauses that require selling a significant portion of the entitled production to local governments or markets at discounted prices. |
Average production cost per unit of production a
$ per unit of production | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
North America |
South America |
Africa |
Asia |
Australasia |
Total group average |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
UK |
Rest of Europe |
US |
Rest of North America |
Russia b |
Rest of Asia |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subsidiaries |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
22.95 | 13.80 | 11.84 | 43.56 | 5.44 | 11.02 | | 9.81 | 2.88 | 10.26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
44.67 | 18.85 | 14.22 | | 5.43 | 13.37 | | 15.55 | 3.92 | 12.68 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
34.10 | 24.48 | 16.11 | | 5.92 | 13.84 | | 13.20 | 3.21 | 13.16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity-accounted entities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
| | | | 12.10 | | 2.60 | 4.59 | | 3.93 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
| | | | 11.28 | | 3.82 | 4.34 | | 4.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
| | | | 12.16 | | 4.36 | 4.19 | | 5.28 |
a | Units of production are barrels for liquids and thousands of cubic feet for gas. Amounts do not include ad valorem and severance taxes. |
b | The operational and financial information of the Rosneft segment for 2015 is based on preliminary operational and financial results of Rosneft for the three months ended 31 December 2015. Actual results may differ from these amounts. |
232 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
$ million | ||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||
Environmental expenditure relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill |
5,452 | 190 | (66 | ) a | ||||||||
Operating expenditure |
521 | 624 | 657 | |||||||||
Capital expenditure |
733 | 590 | 1,091 | |||||||||
Clean-ups |
34 | 33 | 42 | |||||||||
Additions to environmental remediation provision |
305 | 371 | 472 | |||||||||
Additions to decommissioning provision |
972 | 2,216 | 2,092 |
a | The environmental expenditure credit of $66 million in 2013 arises primarily from the write-back of a spill response provision. |
Environmental expenditure relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill
For full details of all environmental activities in relation to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill, see Financial statements Note 2.
Other environmental expenditure
Operating and capital expenditure on the prevention, control, treatment or elimination of air and water emissions and solid waste is often not incurred as a separately identifiable transaction. Instead, it forms part of a larger transaction that includes, for example, normal operations and maintenance expenditure. The figures for environmental operating and capital expenditure in the table are therefore estimates, based on the definitions and guidelines of the American Petroleum Institute.
Environmental operating expenditure of $521 million in 2015 (2014 $624 million) decreased primarily due to Downstream reduced level of turnaround activity in 2015.
Environmental capital expenditure in 2015 was higher than in 2014, primarily driven by the installation of a dissolved nitrogen floatation unit at Whiting refinerys wastewater treatment plant that is designed to improve the quality of cleaned water before it leaves the refinery. The increase also reflects the investment at our Cooper River, US and Geel, Belgium petrochemicals site to upgrade it to our latest generation PTA technology that is expected to significantly increase manufacturing efficiency resulting in lower greenhouse gas emissions and improved energy efficiency.
Clean-up costs increased to $34 million in 2015 compared with $33 million in 2014, primarily due to higher remediation management costs.
In addition to operating and capital expenditures, we also establish provisions for future environmental remediation. Expenditure against such provisions normally occurs in subsequent periods and is not included in environmental operating expenditure reported for such periods.
Provisions for environmental remediation are made when a clean-up is probable and the amount of the obligation can be reliably estimated. Generally, this coincides with the commitment to a formal plan of action or, if earlier, on divestment or on closure of inactive sites.
The extent and cost of future environmental restoration, remediation and abatement programmes are inherently difficult to estimate. They often depend on the extent of contamination, and the associated impact and timing of the corrective actions required, technological feasibility and BPs share of liability. Though the costs of future programmes could be significant and may be material to the results of operations in the period in which they are recognized, it is not expected that such costs will be material to the groups overall results of operations or financial position.
In 2015 the additions to the environmental provision were lower as 2014 included more new sites and increased provisions from existing sites resulting from recent acquisitions. The charge for environmental remediation provisions in 2015 included $6 million in respect of provisions for new sites (2014 $13 million and 2013 $13 million).
In addition, we make provisions on installation of our oil- and gas-producing assets and related pipelines to meet the cost of eventual decommissioning. On installation of an oil or natural gas production facility, a provision is established that represents the discounted value of the expected future cost of decommissioning the asset.
In 2015 additions to the decommissioning provision were less than in 2014, and occurred as a result of detailed reviews of expected future costs. The majority of these additions related to our sites in the North Sea, the Gulf of Mexico and Angola. The additions in 2013 and 2014 were driven by detailed reviews of expected future costs, increases to the asset base and for 2013, changes in estimation processes.
We undertake periodic reviews of existing provisions. These reviews take account of revised cost assumptions, changes in decommissioning requirements and any technological developments.
Provisions for environmental remediation and decommissioning are usually established on a discounted basis, as required by IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
Further details of decommissioning and environmental provisions appear in the financial statements Note 22.
Regulation of the groups business
BPs activities, including its oil and gas exploration and production, pipelines and transportation, refining and marketing, petrochemicals production, trading, biofuels, wind and shipping activities, are conducted in more than 70 countries and are subject to a broad range of EU, US, international, regional and local legislation and regulations, including legislation that implements international conventions and protocols. These cover virtually all aspects of BPs activities and include matters such as licence acquisition, production rates, royalties, environmental, health and safety protection, fuel specifications and transportation, trading, pricing, anti-trust, export, taxes and foreign exchange.
The terms and conditions of the leases, licences and contracts under which our oil and gas interests are held vary from country to country. These leases, licences and contracts are generally granted by or entered into with a government entity or state-owned or controlled company and are sometimes entered into with private property owners. Arrangements with governmental or state entities usually take the form of licences or production-sharing agreements (PSAs), although arrangements with the US government can be by lease. Arrangements with private property owners are usually in the form of leases.
Licences (or concessions) give the holder the right to explore for and exploit a commercial discovery. Under a licence, the holder bears the risk of exploration, development and production activities and provides the financing for these operations. In principle, the licence holder is entitled to all production, minus any royalties that are payable in kind. A licence holder is generally required to pay production taxes or royalties, which may be in cash or in kind. Less typically, BP may explore for and exploit hydrocarbons under a service agreement with the host entity in exchange for reimbursement of costs and/or a fee paid in cash rather than production.
PSAs entered into with a government entity or state-owned or controlled company generally require BP to provide all the financing and bear the risk of exploration and production activities in exchange for a share of the production remaining after royalties, if any.
In certain countries, separate licences are required for exploration and production activities, and in some cases production licences are limited to only a portion of the area covered by the original exploration licence. Both exploration and production licences are generally for a specified period of time. In the US, leases from the US government typically remain in effect for a specified term, but may be extended beyond that term as long as there is production in paying quantities. The term of BPs licences and the extent to which these licences may be renewed vary from country to country.
BP frequently conducts its exploration and production activities in joint arrangements * or co-ownership arrangements with other international oil companies, state-owned or controlled companies and/or private companies. These joint arrangements may be incorporated or unincorporated arrangements, while the co-ownerships are typically unincorporated. Whether incorporated or unincorporated, relevant agreements set out each partys level of participation or ownership
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 233 |
interest in the joint arrangement or co-ownership. Conventionally, all costs, benefits, rights, obligations, liabilities and risks incurred in carrying out joint arrangement or co-ownership operations under a lease or licence are shared among the joint arrangement or co-owning parties according to these agreed ownership interests. Ownership of joint arrangement or co-owned property and hydrocarbons to which the joint arrangement or co-ownership is entitled is also shared in these proportions. To the extent that any liabilities arise, whether to governments or third parties, or as between the joint arrangement parties or co-owners themselves, each joint arrangement party or co-owner will generally be liable to meet these in proportion to its ownership interest. In many upstream operations, a party (known as the operator) will be appointed (pursuant to a joint operating agreement) to carry out day-to-day operations on behalf of the joint arrangement or co-ownership. The operator is typically one of the joint arrangement parties or a co-owner and will carry out its duties either through its own staff, or by contracting out various elements to third-party contractors or service providers. BP acts as operator on behalf of joint arrangements and co-ownerships in a number of countries where it has exploration and production activities.
Frequently, work (including drilling and related activities) will be contracted out to third-party service providers who have the relevant expertise and equipment not available within the joint arrangement or the co-owning operators organization. The relevant contract will specify the work to be done and the remuneration to be paid and will typically set out how major risks will be allocated between the joint arrangement or co-ownership and the service provider. Generally, the joint arrangement or co-owner and the contractor would respectively allocate responsibility for and provide reciprocal indemnities to each other for harm caused to and by their respective staff and property. Depending on the service to be provided, an oil and gas industry service contract may also contain provisions allocating risks and liabilities associated with pollution and environmental damage, damage to a well or hydrocarbon reservoir and for claims from third parties or other losses. The allocation of those risks vary among contracts and are determined through negotiation between the parties.
In general, BP incurs income tax on income generated from production activities (whether under a licence or PSA). In addition, depending on the area, BPs production activities may be subject to a range of other taxes, levies and assessments, including special petroleum taxes and revenue taxes. The taxes imposed on oil and gas production profits and activities may be substantially higher than those imposed on other activities, for example in Abu Dhabi, Angola, Egypt, Norway, the UK, the US, Russia and Trinidad & Tobago.
Environmental regulation
Current and proposed fuel and product specifications, emission controls (including control of vehicle emissions), climate change programmes and regulation of unconventional oil and gas extraction under a number of environmental laws may have a significant effect on the production, sale and profitability of many of BPs products.
There are also environmental laws that require BP to remediate and restore areas affected by the release of hazardous substances or hydrocarbons associated with our operations or properties. These laws may apply to sites that BP currently owns or operates, sites that it previously owned or operated, or sites used for the disposal of its and other parties waste. See Financial Statements Note 22 for information on provisions for environmental restoration and remediation.
A number of pending or anticipated governmental proceedings against certain BP group companies under environmental laws could result in monetary or other sanctions. Group companies are also subject to environmental claims for personal injury and property damage alleging the release of, or exposure to, hazardous substances. The costs associated with future environmental remediation obligations, governmental proceedings and claims could be significant and may be material to the results of operations in the period in which they are recognized. We cannot accurately predict the effects of future
developments, such as stricter environmental laws or enforcement policies, or future events at our facilities, on the group, and there can be no assurance that material liabilities and costs will not be incurred in the future. For a discussion of the groups environmental expenditure see page 233.
A significant proportion of our fixed assets are located in the US and the EU. US and EU environmental, health and safety regulations significantly affect BPs operations. Significant legislation and regulation in the US and the EU affecting our businesses and profitability includes the following:
United States
| The Clean Air Act (CAA) regulates air emissions, permitting, fuel specifications and other aspects of our production, distribution and marketing activities. Stricter limits on sulphur in fuels will affect us in future, as will actions on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and other air pollutants. The revised lower ambient air quality standard for ozone, finalized by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in October 2015, as well as proposed new restrictions on methane and volatile organic emissions and on gas flaring, will affect our US operations in the future. States may also have separate, stricter air emission laws in addition to the CAA. |
| The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 affect our US fuel markets by, among other things, imposing renewable fuel mandates and imposing GHG emissions thresholds for certain renewable fuels. States such as California also impose additional carbon fuel standards as well as Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) and Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) standards imposed on vehicle manufacturers. These regulations will have an impact on fuel demand and product mix in California and those states adopting LEV and ZEV standards. |
| The Clean Water Act regulates wastewater and other effluent discharges from BPs facilities, and BP is required to obtain discharge permits, install control equipment and implement operational controls and preventative measures. |
| The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act regulates the generation, storage, transportation and disposal of wastes associated with our operations and can require corrective action at locations where such wastes have been disposed of or released. |
| The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) can, in certain circumstances, impose the entire cost of investigation and remediation on a party who owned or operated a site contaminated with a hazardous substance, or arranged for disposal of a hazardous substance at a site. BP has incurred, or is likely to incur, liability under the CERCLA or similar state laws, including costs attributed to insolvent or unidentified parties. BP is also subject to claims for remediation costs under other federal and state laws, and to claims for natural resource damages under the CERCLA, the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90) (discussed below) and other federal and state laws. CERCLA also requires notification of releases of hazardous substances to national, state and local government agencies, as applicable. In addition, the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act requires notification of releases of designated quantities of certain listed hazardous substances to state and local government agencies, as applicable. |
| The Toxic Substances Control Act regulates BPs manufacture, import, export, sale and use of chemical substances and products. |
| The Occupational Safety and Health Act imposes workplace safety and health requirements on BP operations along with significant process safety management obligations, requiring continuous evaluation and improvement of operational practices to enhance safety and reduce workplace emissions at gas processing and refining facilities. |
| In May 2012, the US adopted the UN Global Harmonization System (GHS) for hazard classification and labelling of chemicals and products, with the modification of the Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) Hazard Communication Standard. This required BP to reassess the hazards of all of its chemicals and products against new GHS criteria as adopted or modified by OSHA and warning labels and safety data sheets were updated accordingly by 1 June 2015. |
| The US Department of Transportation (DOT) regulates the transport of BPs petroleum products such as crude oil, gasoline, petrochemicals and other hydrocarbon liquids. |
234 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
| The Maritime Transportation Security Act, the DOT Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT) and the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standard regulations impose security compliance regulations on around 15 BP facilities. |
| OPA 90 is implemented through regulations issued by the EPA, the US Coast Guard, the DOT, OSHA, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement and various states. Alaska and the West Coast states currently have the most demanding state requirements. |
| The Outer Continental Shelf Land Act and other statutes give the Department of Interior (DOI) and the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) authority to regulate operations and air emissions on offshore and onshore operations on federal lands subject to DOI authority. New stricter regulations on operational practices, equipment and testing have been imposed on our operations in the Gulf of Mexico and elsewhere following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. |
European Union
| In October 2014, the European Council agreed on new climate and energy targets for the period up to 2030. Specifically, Member States have agreed to a 40% reduction in GHG emissions below 1990 levels and to a 27% share of renewable energy in final energy consumption. Specific EU legislation and agreements required to achieve these goals are not yet in place. |
| The 2008 EU Climate and Energy Package is expected to remain in place until 2020 and includes an updated EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) Directive (see Greenhouse gas regulation below), the EU Fuel Quality Directive and the Renewable Energy Directive. |
| The EU Fuel Quality Directive affects our production and marketing of transport fuels. Revisions adopted in 2009 mandate reductions in the life cycle GHG emissions per unit of energy and tighter environmental fuel quality standards for petrol and diesel. |
| The Renewable Energy Directive requires Member States to have 10% (by energy content) of final transportation fuel to be derived from renewable energy, such as biofuels and renewable electricity. This target must be met by the end of 2020. |
| The Energy Efficiency Directive (EED) was adopted in 2012. It requires EU Member States to implement an indicative 2020 energy saving target and apply a framework of measures as part of a national energy efficiency programme, including mandatory industrial energy efficiency surveys. This directive has been implemented in the UK by the Energy Savings Opportunity Scheme Regulations 2014, which affects our offshore and onshore assets. The ISO50001 standard is being implemented by organizations in some EU states to meet some elements of the Energy Efficiency Directive. |
| The Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) 2010 provides the framework for granting permits for major industrial sites. It lays down rules on integrated prevention and control of air, water and soil pollution arising from industrial activities. This may result in requirements for BP to further reduce its emissions, particularly its air and water emissions. As part of the IED framework, additional emission limit values are informed by the sector specific and cross-sector Best Available Technology (BAT) Conclusions, such as the BAT Conclusions for the refining sector and for combustion. |
| The National Emission Ceiling Directive 2001 is currently being revised and subsequent source-control measures by Member States may be required to meet national emissions targets. These may result in further emission reduction requirements. |
| The EU regulation on ozone depleting substances (ODS) 2009 requires BP to reduce the use of ODS and phase out use of certain ODSs. BP continues to replace ODS in refrigerants and/or equipment in the EU and elsewhere, in accordance with the Montreal Protocol and related legislation. In addition, the EU regulation on fluorinated greenhouse gases with high global warming potential (the F-gas Regulations) came into force on 1 January 2015. The F-gas Regulations require a phase-out of certain hydrofluorocarbons, based on global warming potential. |
| European regulations also establish passenger car performance standards for CO 2 tailpipe emissions (European Regulation (EC) No |
443/2009). From 2020 onwards, the European passenger fleet emissions target is 95 grams of CO 2 per kilometre. This target will be achieved by manufacturing fuel efficient vehicles and vehicles using alternative, low carbon fuels such as hydrogen and electricity. In addition, vehicle emission test cycles and vehicle type approval procedures are being updated to improve accuracy of emission and efficiency measurements. Consequently, product mix and overall levels of demand will be impacted. |
| European vehicle CO 2 emission regulations also impact the fuel efficiency of vans. By 2020, the EU fleet of newly registered vans must meet a target of 147 grams of CO 2 per kilometre, which is 19% below the 2012 fleet average. |
| The EU Registration, Evaluation Authorization and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) Regulation requires registration of chemical substances manufactured in or imported into the EU, together with the submission of relevant hazard and risk data. REACH affects our refining, petrochemicals, exploration and production, biofuels, lubricants and other manufacturing or trading/import operations. In accordance with the required phase-in timetable, BP completed registration of all substances in tonnage bands equal to or greater than 100 tonnes per annum/legal entity, and is in the process of preparing registration dossiers for substances manufactured or imported in amounts in the range 1-100 tonnes per annum/legal entity that are currently due to be submitted before 31 May 2018 or checking that BP imports are covered by the registrations of non-EU suppliers only representatives. BP continues to maintain compliance by submitting registrations to cover new manufactured and imported substances, and to update previously submitted registrations as required. Some substances registered previously, including substances supplied to us by third parties for our use, are now subject to evaluation and review for potential authorization or restriction procedures, and possible banning, by the European Chemicals Agency and EU Member State authorities. |
| In addition, the EU implemented the UNs Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) through the Classification Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulation. This requires BP to reassess the hazards of all our chemicals and products against the new GHS criteria as adopted or modified by the EU and to update warning labels and safety data sheets accordingly. From 1 June 2015, the CLP Regulation applies in full to mixtures (e.g. lubricants) that are placed on the market. A separate EU regulation on export and import of hazardous chemicals requires warning labels and safety data sheets accompanying EU exports to be compliant with relevant CLP and REACH requirements (unless this conflicts with requirements in the importing country) and, as far as practicable, in the official or one or more principal languages of the intended area of use. Safety data sheets for the EU market have been updated to include both REACH and CLP information. |
| The EU Offshore Safety Directive was adopted in 2013. Its purpose is to introduce a harmonized regime aimed at reducing the potential environmental, health and safety impacts of the offshore oil and gas industry throughout EU waters. The Directive has been implemented in the UK primarily through the Offshore Installations (Offshore Safety Directive) (Safety Case etc.) Regulations 2015. |
| The implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000 and the Environmental Quality Standards Directive 2008 may mean that BP has to take further steps to manage freshwater withdrawals and discharges from its EU operations. |
Regulations governing the discharge of treated water have also been developed in countries outside of the US and EU. This includes regulations in Trinidad and Angola. In Trinidad, BP has been working with the regulators to apply water discharge rules arising from the Certificate of Environmental Clearance (CEC) Regulations 2001, and associated Water Pollution Rules 2007. In Angola, BP has been upgrading produced water treatment systems to meet revised Oil in Water limits for produced water discharge under Executive Decree ED 97-14 (superseded ED 12/05 on 1 January 2016).
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 235 |
Environmental maritime regulations
BPs shipping operations are subject to extensive national and international regulations governing liability, operations, training, spill prevention and insurance. These include:
| In US waters, OPA 90 imposes liability and spill prevention and planning requirements governing, among others, tankers, barges and offshore facilities. It also mandates a levy on imported and domestically produced oil to fund oil spill responses. Some states, including Alaska, Washington, Oregon and California, impose additional liability for oil spills. Outside US territorial waters, BP shipping tankers are subject to international liability, spill response and preparedness regulations under the UNs International Maritime Organization, including the International Convention on Civil Liability for Oil Pollution, the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL) Convention, the International Convention on Oil Pollution, Preparedness, Response and Co-operation and the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage. In April 2010, the Hazardous and Noxious Substance (HNS) Protocol 2010 was adopted to address issues that have inhibited ratification of the International Convention on Liability and Compensation for Damage in Connection with the Carriage of Hazardous and Noxious Substances by Sea 1996. As at year end, as the required minimum number of contracting states had not been achieved, the HNS Convention has not yet entered into force. |
| Changes to the permitted level of sulphur in marine fuels under EU mandated reductions for European waters and International Maritime Organization (IMO) regulations are being phased in until 2020, when the low sulphur rules for shipping in global waters are scheduled to take effect. Depending on the outcome of ongoing IMO deliberations, the regulations impacting operations in global waters may be delayed until 2025. Regulations requiring the reduction of sulphur oxides emissions will require ships to either burn low sulphur marine fuels or continue using higher sulphur fuel along with approved on-board sulphur abatement technology. Compliance with the IMO regulations may place additional costs on refineries producing marine fuel, including costs to dispose of sulphur, as well as increased GHG emissions and energy costs for additional refining. |
To meet its financial responsibility requirements, BP shipping maintains marine liability pollution insurance in respect of its operated ships to a maximum limit of $1 billion for each occurrence through mutual insurance associations (P&I Clubs), although there can be no assurance that a spill will necessarily be adequately covered by insurance or that liabilities will not exceed insurance recoveries.
Greenhouse gas regulation
In 2011, parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (Framework Convention) at the Conference of the Parties (COP17) in Durban agreed to several measures. One was a roadmap for negotiating a legal framework for action on climate change by 2015 that would involve all countries by 2020 and would close the ambition gap between existing GHG reduction pledges and what is required to achieve the goal of limiting global temperature rise to 2°C. Another was a second commitment period for the Kyoto Protocol to begin immediately after the first period. An amendment was subsequently adopted at the 2012 conference of parties in Doha (COP18) establishing a second commitment period to run until the end of 2020. However, it did not include the US, Canada, Japan and Russia and thus covers only about 15% of global emissions.
The 2014 conference in Lima (COP20) adopted the Lima Call for Climate Action. This included the elements of a negotiating text for a new international agreement, as specified in Durban in 2011, that would be finalized at COP21 in Paris in December 2015. This text covers long-term ambitions and pathways and a framework for reaching it. COP20 also agreed on the rules for providing and assessing information about each countrys Intended Nationally Determined Contributions towards reaching the overall ambition. The worlds three largest emitters China, the US and the EU have all announced their intentions to limit their GHG emissions.
In December 2015, 195 nations at the United Nations climate change conference in Paris (COP21) adopted the Paris Agreement, for implementation post-2020. This will come into force when it has been ratified by at least 55 of the parties to the Framework Convention, representing at least 55% of global GHG emissions. For the first time this binds all participants to its provisions and encourages voluntary contributions by developing countries. The Paris Agreement aims to hold global average temperature rise to well below 2 o C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit temperature rise to 1.5 o C above pre-industrial levels. There is no quantitative long-term emissions goal but countries aim to reach global peaking of GHG emissions as soon as possible and to undertake rapid reductions thereafter to achieve a balance between human caused emissions and natural absorption in the second half of this century. The Paris Agreement places binding commitments on all parties, from 2020, to make Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and pursue domestic measures aimed at achieving the objectives of their NDCs. Developed country NDCs should include absolute emission reduction targets, and developing countries are encouraged to move over time towards them. The Paris Agreement places binding commitments on countries, starting by 2023, to report on their emissions and progress made on their NDCs; undergo international review of collective progress; and submit new, more ambitious NDCs every five years. The Paris Agreement extends the existing goal for climate finance to a minimum of $100 billion after 2025.
More stringent national and regional measures can be expected in the future. These measures could increase BPs production costs for certain products, increase demand for competing energy alternatives or products with lower-carbon intensity, and affect the sales and specifications of many of BPs products. Current and announced measures and developments potentially affecting BPs businesses include the following:
| The EU has agreed to an overall GHG reduction target of 20% by 2020. To meet this, a Climate and Energy Package of regulatory measures was adopted that includes: a collective national reduction target for emissions not covered by the EU ETS; binding national renewable energy targets to double usage of renewable energy sources in the EU including at least a 10% share of renewable energy in the transport sector; a legal framework to promote carbon capture and storage (CCS); and a revised EU ETS Phase 3. EU ETS revisions included a GHG reduction of 21% from 2005 levels; a significant increase in allowance auctioning; an expansion in the scope of the EU ETS to encompass more industrial sectors (including the petrochemicals sector) and gases; no free allocation for electricity generation (including that which is self-generated off-shore) or production, but benchmarked free allocation for energy-intensive and trade-exposed industrial sectors. EU ETS revisions also included the adoption of a Market Stability Reserve to reduce the supply of auctioned allowances. This will take effect in 2019 and could potentially lead to higher carbon costs. EU Energy efficiency policy is currently implemented via national energy efficiency action plans and the Energy Efficiency Directive adopted in 2012. The EU has also agreed to the 2030 Climate and Energy Policy framework with a goal of at least a 40% reduction in GHGs from 1990 and measures to achieve a 27% share of renewable energy and a 27% increase in energy efficiency. The GHG reduction target is to be achieved by a 43% reduction of emissions from sectors covered by the EU ETS, and a 30% GHG reduction by Member States for all other GHG emissions. |
| Canadas highest emitting province, Alberta, has regulations targeting large final emitters (sites with over 100,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per annum) with intensity targets of 2% improvement per year up to 20%. Compliance is possible via direct reductions, the purchase of offsets or the payment of C$20/tonne to a technology fund which will escalate to $30/tonne in 2017. A new policy direction has just been announced for post-2018 where performance relative to a best in sector benchmark (to be determined) will now determine the volume of emissions subject to a cost ($30/tonne escalating in real terms) or use of other compliance mechanisms such as offsets. |
| In the US, the EPA continues to pursue regulatory measures to address GHGs under the CAA. |
|
EPA regulations impose light, medium and heavy duty vehicle emissions standards for GHGs and permitting requirements for |
236 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
certain large GHG stationary emission sources. The EPA and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are considering a proposed rulemaking to extend and tighten GHG emission and fuel efficiency standards until 2027. This will have an impact on BPs product mix and overall demand. |
| Under the GHG mandatory reporting rule (GHGMRR), annual reports on GHG emissions must be filed. In addition to direct emissions from affected facilities, producers and importers/ exporters of petroleum products, certain natural gas liquids and GHGs are required to report product volumes and notional GHG emissions as if these products were fully combusted. |
| The EPA proposed regulations establishing GHG emission limits for new and modified power plants in September 2013. In June 2014, the EPA proposed a Clean Energy Plan Regulation that establishes GHG reduction requirements, at a state or regional level, for existing power plants. The new and modified power plant rule was finalized in August 2015 while the existing power plant rule was finalized in October 2015. Legal challenges to both rules have been filed by a number of US States; utility, coal, and mining companies; and the US Chamber of Commerce. These rules are important due to potential impacts on electricity prices, reliability of electricity supply, precedents for similar rules targeting other sectors and potential impacts on combined heat and power installations. |
| In January 2015, the US government announced plans to reduce methane emissions from the oil and gas sector by 40-45% from 2012 levels by 2025. In September 2015, the EPA proposed rules aimed at limiting methane emissions from the oil and natural gas sector in the US with plans to finalize these rules in early 2016. In January 2016, the BLM released proposed rules aimed at limiting methane emissions on federal lands from new, modified and existing sources in the oil and gas sector. If implemented as proposed, these EPA and BLM rules will require further actions by our US upstream businesses to manage methane emissions. |
| A number of additional state and regional initiatives in the US will affect our operations. California implemented a low-carbon fuel standard in 2010. The California cap and trade programme started in January 2012 with the first auctions of carbon allowances held in November 2012 and obligations commencing from 2013. The California cap and trade programme was broadened to include transport fuels on 1 January 2015. |
| In the November 2014 US-China joint announcement on climate change addressing post-2020 actions, which was reaffirmed by the countries respective presidents in 2015, the US committed to reducing its GHG emissions by 26-28% below its 2005 level by 2025. Achieving these reductions will require expanded efforts to reduce emissions, which likely will include regulatory measures. China announced it intends to achieve a peak in CO 2 emissions around 2030, with the intention to try to peak earlier and to increase the non-fossil fuel share of all energy to around 20% by 2030. Currently, China has targets to reduce carbon intensity of GDP 40-45% below 2005 levels by 2020 and increase the share of non-fossil fuels in total energy consumption from 7.5% in 2005 to 15% by 2020. |
| China is operating emission trading pilot programmes in five cities and two provinces. A number of BP joint venture * companies in China are participating in these schemes. A nationwide carbon emissions trading market is expected to be launched in 2017 following the above seven pilot programmes. |
| China has also adopted more stringent vehicle tailpipe emission standards and vehicle efficiency standards to address air pollution and GHG emissions. These standards will have an impact on transportation fuel product mix and overall demand. |
| South Africa has delayed implementation of a carbon tax on carbon intensive emitters until 2017. |
For information on the steps that BP is taking in relation to climate change issues and for details of BPs GHG reporting see Environment and society on page 46.
Proceedings relating to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill
Introduction
BP Exploration & Production Inc. (BPXP) was lease operator of Mississippi Canyon, Block 252 in the Gulf of Mexico (Macondo), where the semi-submersible rig Deepwater Horizon was deployed at the time of the 20 April 2010 explosions and fire and resulting oil spill (the Incident). The other working interest owners at the time of the Incident were Anadarko Petroleum Company (Anadarko) and MOEX Offshore 2007 LLC, claims against whom were settled by BP in 2011. The Deepwater Horizon, which was owned and operated by certain affiliates of Transocean Ltd. (Transocean), sank on 22 April 2010. Lawsuits and claims arising from the Incident have generally been brought in US federal and state courts. The lawsuits have asserted, among others, claims under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA 90), claims for personal injury in connection with the Incident itself and the response to it, wrongful death, commercial and economic injury, breach of contract and violations of statutes. The plaintiffs include individuals, corporations, insurers and governmental entities and many of the lawsuits purport to be class actions.
Many of the lawsuits in federal court were consolidated by the Federal Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation into two multi-district litigation proceedings, one in federal district court in Houston for the securities, derivative and Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) cases (MDL 2185) and another in federal district court in New Orleans for the remaining cases (MDL 2179). A Plaintiffs Steering Committee (PSC) was established to act on behalf of individual and business plaintiffs in MDL 2179. These proceedings, and other material ongoing lawsuits and claims arising from the Incident are discussed below.
Federal and state claims
MDL 2179 Department of Justice (DoJ) Action and Trial of Liability, Limitation, Exoneration and Fault Allocation
The US filed a civil complaint in MDL 2179 against BPXP and others on 15 December 2010 (the DoJ Action). The complaint sought an order finding liability under OPA 90 for natural resources damages and civil penalties under the Clean Water Act (CWA). To address certain issues asserted in or relevant to the claims, counterclaims, cross-claims, third-party claims, and comparative fault defences raised in the DoJ Action, a Trial of Liability, Limitation, Exoneration and Fault Allocation (the Trial) in MDL 2179 commenced on 25 February 2013.
The district court issued its ruling on the first phase of the Trial in September 2014. BPXP, BP America Production Company (BPAPC) and various other parties were each found liable under general maritime law for the blowout, explosion and oil spill from the Macondo well. With respect to the United States claim against BPXP under the CWA, the district court found that the discharge of oil was the result of BPXPs gross negligence and wilful misconduct and that BPXP was therefore subject to enhanced civil penalties.
The district court issued its ruling on the second phase of the Trial in January 2015. It found that 3.19 million barrels of oil were discharged into the Gulf of Mexico and were therefore subject to a CWA penalty. In addition, the district court found that BP was not grossly negligent in its source control efforts. For further details of the Trial, see Legal proceedings in BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2014.
BP appealed both rulings.
The penalty phase of the Trial involved consideration of the amount of CWA civil penalties owed to the United States, and concluded in February 2015. Briefing concluded on the post-trial briefing schedule for the penalty phase on 24 April 2015.
State and local authority claims consolidated into MDL 2179
On 12 August 2010, the State of Alabama filed a lawsuit seeking damages for alleged economic and environmental harms, including natural resource damages, civil penalties under state law, declaratory and injunctive relief, and punitive damages as a result of the Incident.
On 3 March 2011, the State of Louisiana filed a lawsuit to declare various BP entities (as well as other entities) liable for removal costs and
* Defined on page 256. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 237 |
damages, including natural resource damages under federal and state law, to recover civil penalties, attorneys fees and response costs under state law, and to recover for alleged negligence, nuisance, trespass, fraudulent concealment and negligent misrepresentation of material facts regarding safety procedures and BPs (and other defendants) ability to manage the oil spill, unjust enrichment from economic and other damages to the State of Louisiana and its citizens, and punitive damages. In addition, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality issued an administrative order seeking environmental civil penalties and other relief under state law.
On 10 December 2010, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality issued a Complaint and Notice of Violation alleging violations of several state environmental statutes.
In April 2013, the states of Alabama, Florida and Mississippi each filed actions against BP related to the Incident, including general maritime law claims of negligence, gross negligence, and wilful misconduct; claims under OPA 90 seeking damages for removal costs, natural resource damages, property damage, lost tax and other revenue and damages for providing increased public services during or after removal activities; and various state law claims.
On 17 May 2013, the State of Texas filed suit against BP and others in federal court in Texas. Its complaint asserted claims under OPA 90 for natural resource damages, lost sales tax and state park revenue; claims for natural resource damages under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; and claims for natural resource damages, cost recovery, civil penalties and economic damages under state environmental statutes.
Each of these actions filed by the Gulf Coast states was consolidated with MDL 2179.
On 28 August 2015, the district court in MDL 2179 issued an order dismissing the local government entity master complaint in view of the fact that the vast majority of local government entity plaintiffs who had preserved their claims had released their claims as part of the local government entity settlement with BPXP (as described below under Consent Decree and Settlement Agreement). With respect to claims by local government entities that have not released their claims, the court held that they are time-barred except to the extent that those local government entities previously made timely presentment of their claims under OPA 90 and previously filed either a complaint or a valid short-form joinder in the MDL 2179 master complaint for local government entities.
Consent Decree and Settlement Agreement
On 2 July 2015, BP announced that BPXP had executed agreements in principle with the United States federal government and five Gulf Coast states to settle all federal and state claims arising from the Incident. In addition to settling claims with the states of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, BPXP also settled the claims made by more than 400 local government entities.
On 5 October 2015, the United States lodged with the district court in MDL 2179 a proposed Consent Decree between the United States, the Gulf states and BP to fully and finally resolve any and all natural resource damages claims of the United States, the Gulf states and their respective natural resource trustees and all CWA penalty claims, and certain other claims of the United States and the Gulf states. Concurrently, BP entered into a definitive Settlement Agreement with the five Gulf states (Settlement Agreement) with respect to state claims for economic, property and other losses. The United States is expected to file a motion with the court to enter the Consent Decree as a final settlement around the end of March, which the court will then consider. The time period for public comments on the Consent Decree ended on 4 December 2015.
The proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement are conditional upon each other and neither will become effective unless there is final court approval of the Consent Decree. A further condition of the agreements in principle was that local government entities execute releases to BPs satisfaction. BP advised the court that it was satisfied with and has accepted releases received from the vast majority of local entities. Accordingly, on 27 July 2015, the district court ordered BP to commence processing payments required under the releases and BP made such payments in accordance with the courts order.
The principal payments are as follows:
| BPXP is to pay the United States a civil penalty of $5.5 billion under the CWA payable over 15 years. |
| BPXP will pay $7.1 billion to the United States and the five Gulf states over 15 years for natural resource damages (NRD). This is in addition to the $1 billion already committed for early restoration. BPXP will also set aside an additional amount (up to $700 million) consisting of $232 million and the NRD interest payment (see below) partly to cover any further natural resource damages that are unknown at the time of the agreement. |
| A total of $4.9 billion will be paid over 18 years to settle economic and other claims made by the five Gulf Coast states. |
| Up to $1 billion to resolve claims made by more than 400 local government entities. |
BPXP has also agreed to pay $350 million to cover outstanding NRD assessment costs and $250 million to cover the full settlement of outstanding response costs, claims related to the False Claims Act and royalties owed for the Macondo well. These additional payments will be paid over nine years, beginning in 2015.
NRD and CWA payments are scheduled to start 12 months after the Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement become effective. The 2016 payments in respect of the state claims are due within 90 days of the Settlement Agreement becoming effective. Total payments for NRD, CWA and state claims will be made at a rate of around $1.1 billion a year for the majority of the payment period.
Interest will accrue at a fixed rate on the unpaid balance of the CWA and NRD payments, compounded annually and payable in year 16. To address possible natural resource damages unknown at the time of the settlement, beginning 10 years after the Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement become effective, the federal government and the five Gulf states may request accelerated payment of accrued but unpaid interest on the NRD payments.
Parent company guarantees for these payments will be provided by BP Corporation North America Inc. as the primary guarantor and BP p.l.c. as the secondary guarantor.
The federal government and the Gulf states may jointly elect to accelerate the payments under the Consent Decree in the event of a change of control or insolvency of BP p.l.c., and the Gulf states individually have similar acceleration rights under the Settlement Agreement.
The proposed Consent Decree and Settlement Agreement do not cover the remaining costs of the 2012 class action settlements with the PSC for economic and property damage and medical claims. They also do not cover claims by individuals and businesses that opted out of the 2012 PSC settlements and/or whose claims were excluded from them, including claims for recovery of losses allegedly resulting from the 2010 federal deepwater drilling moratoria and/or the related permitting processes. The proposed Consent Decree and Settlement Agreement also do not resolve private securities litigation pending in MDL 2185. Each of these outstanding proceedings and claims is discussed further below.
On 5 October 2015, on the joint motion of BP and the five Gulf states, the district court dismissed the five Gulf states claims (with the exception of claims for NRD and CWA penalties being addressed by the proposed Consent Decree) against BP. The dismissal is without prejudice pending the courts entry of the Consent Decree, which is required for the Settlement Agreement with the Gulf states to become effective, at which time the dismissal would be converted into a dismissal with prejudice.
OPA 90 Test Case Proceedings
A number of lawsuits have been brought, primarily from business claimants, under OPA 90 in relation to the 2010 federal deepwater drilling moratoria. Following the dismissal of one test case in January 2016, six test cases, consolidated with MDL 2179, will address certain OPA 90 liability questions focusing on, among other issues, whether plaintiffs alleged losses tied to the moratoria and whether federal permit delays are compensable. In December 2015, BP filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs claims arising from the moratoria or permit process, and
238 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
plaintiffs filed a motion asking the court to prevent BP from arguing that government action and/or inaction following the oil spill is a superseding cause with respect to some or all of the damages that plaintiffs claim. The motions are fully briefed, but the court has not yet issued a ruling.
Halliburton and Transocean settlements.
On 20 May 2015, BP and Transocean, and BP and Halliburton Energy Services Inc. (Halliburton), entered into confidential settlement agreements to resolve the final remaining disputes between these parties stemming from the Incident.
Under the agreement with Transocean, BPXP and BPAPC agreed to indemnify Transocean for compensatory damages (including natural resource damages), to pay Transocean $125 million in compensation for incurred legal fees, and discontinue attempts to recover as an additional insured under Transoceans liability policies. Transocean agreed to indemnify BPXP and BPAPC for the personal and bodily injury claims of Transocean employees, as well as for claims relating to any future cleanup or removal of diesel or other pollutants stored on the Deepwater Horizon. BPXP, BPAPC, and Transocean will mutually release all claims between the companies.
BPXPs agreement with Halliburton resolves the remaining claims between the two companies and includes indemnities and the dismissal of all claims against each other.
Agreement for early natural resource restoration
On 21 April 2011, BP announced an agreement with natural resource trustees for the US and five Gulf Coast states, providing for up to $1 billion to be spent on early restoration projects to address natural resource injuries resulting from the Incident. To date, BP and the trustees have reached agreement on a total of 65 early restoration projects that are expected to cost approximately $877 million. The remaining unpaid balance of the $1 billion will be paid within 30 days after court approval of the proposed Consent Decree.
Under the proposed Consent Decree, Trustees would continue to implement these early restoration projects as part of the final settlement of all US and state claims for natural resource damages.
PSC settlements
PSC settlements Economic and Property Damages Settlement Agreement
The Economic and Property Damages Settlement resolves certain economic and property damage claims, and includes a $2.3 billion BP commitment to help resolve economic loss claims related to the Gulf seafood industry (which we refer to as the Seafood Compensation Fund) and a $57-million fund to support advertising to promote Gulf Coast tourism. It also resolves property damage in certain areas along the Gulf Coast, as well as claims for additional payments under certain Master Vessel Charter Agreements entered into in the course of the Vessels of Opportunity Program implemented as part of the response to the Incident. The Economic and Property Damages Settlement does not cover claims by individuals and businesses that opted out of the 2012 PSC settlements and/or whose claims were excluded from them, including claims for recovery of losses allegedly resulting from the 2010 federal deepwater drilling moratoria and/or the related permitting processes. The Economic and Property Damages Settlement also does not resolve private securities litigation pending in MDL 2185.
The economic and property damages claims process is under court supervision through the settlement claims process established by the Economic and Property Damages Settlement. This provides that class members release and dismiss their claims against BP not expressly reserved by that agreement. The Economic and Property Damages Settlement also provided that, to the extent permitted by law, BP assigned to the PSC certain of its claims, rights and recoveries against Transocean and Halliburton for damages with protections such that Transocean and Halliburton cannot pass those damages through to BP. The claims facility operating under the framework established by the Economic and Property Damages Settlement commenced operation in June 2012. Following numerous court decisions on 31 March 2015, the court denied the PSCs motion seeking to alter or amend a revised policy, addressing the matching of revenue and expenses for business economic loss claims, which requires the matching of revenue with the expenses incurred by claimants to generate that revenue, even where
the revenue and expenses were recorded at different times. On 23 April 2015, the PSC appealed this decision to the Fifth Circuit. On 18 December 2015, the PSC and BP entered into a joint stipulation to stay this appeal pending resolution of certain issues in the district court in New Orleans. On 8 January 2016, the Fifth Circuit granted the joint stipulation and stayed the appeal for 120 days.
The effective date of the Economic and Property Damages Settlement Agreement was 8 December 2014, and the final deadline for filing all claims other than those that fall into the Seafood Compensation Program was 8 June 2015.
On 8 May 2015, the Fifth Circuit upheld three awards to non-profit entities under the Economic and Property Damages Settlement, each of which was premised on an official policy that typically treated grant monies and contributions to non-profit entities as revenue for purposes of the settlements calculations. BP argued that this policy was inconsistent with the language of the settlement agreement and would place the agreement in violation of United States law, but the Fifth Circuit upheld the policy and determined that the district court did not otherwise abuse its discretion in denying review of the three awards. The court also held that requests for discretionary review of settlement claims by BP or individual claimants under the Economic and Property Damages Settlement can be appealed by BP or individual claimants to the Fifth Circuit.
For more information about BPs current estimate of the total cost of the Economic and Property Damages Settlement, see Financial statements Note 2.
PSC settlements Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement
The Medical Benefits Class Action Settlement (Medical Settlement) resolves certain medical claims by response workers and Gulf Coast residents. Under the Medical Settlement, class members release and dismiss their claims against BP covered by that settlement, except that class members do not release certain claims for later-manifested physical conditions (LMPCs).
The Medical Settlement involves payments to qualifying class members based on a matrix for certain Specified Physical Conditions (SPCs), as well as a 21-year Periodic Medical Consultation Program (PMCP) for qualifying class members. The Medical Settlement also provides that class members claiming LMPCs may pursue their claims through a mediation/litigation process, but waive, among other things, the right to seek punitive damages. Consistent with its commitment to the Gulf, BP has also agreed to provide $105 million to the Gulf Region Health Outreach Program to improve the availability, scope and quality of healthcare in certain Gulf Coast communities. This healthcare outreach programme will be available to, and is intended to benefit, class members and other individuals in those communities. BP has already funded $93.7 million for projects sponsored by this programme.
The district court approved the Medical Settlement in a final order and judgment on 11 January 2013. The effective date was 12 February 2014 and the deadline for submitting claims was 12 February 2015. The total number of claims estimated by the Medical Claims Administrator is approximately 37,200. At year end, approximately 7,600 SPC claims, totalling approximately $17 million, have been approved for compensation. In addition, approximately 22,000 claimants have been determined eligible for the PMCP.
MDL 2185 and other securities-related litigation
Since the Incident, shareholders have sued BP and various of its current and former officers and directors asserting shareholder derivative claims and class and individual securities fraud claims. Many of these lawsuits have been consolidated or co-ordinated in federal district court in Houston (MDL 2185).
* Defined on page 256. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 239 |
Securities class action
On 20 May 2014, the court denied plaintiffs motion to certify a proposed class of ADS purchasers before the Deepwater Horizon explosion (from 8 November 2007 to 20 April 2010) and granted plaintiffs motions to certify a class of post-explosion ADS purchasers from 26 April 2010 to 28 May 2010 and to amend their complaint to add one additional alleged misstatement. The parties appealed the district courts class certification decisions and on 8 September 2015, the Fifth Circuit affirmed both of the district courts decisions. On 26 October 2015, the Fifth Circuit denied the pre-explosion ADS purchasers motion for rehearing en banc. On 25 January 2016, the pre-explosion ADS purchasers filed in the Supreme Court a petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Fifth Circuits decision. The trial of the securities fraud claims of the class of post explosion ADS purchasers has been scheduled to commence on 5 July 2016.
Individual securities litigation
From April 2012 to September 2015, 37 cases were filed in state and federal courts by pension funds and investment funds and advisers against BP entities and several current and former officers and directors seeking damages for alleged losses those funds suffered because of their purchases of BP ordinary shares and, in two cases, ADSs. The funds assert claims under English law and, for plaintiffs purchasing ADSs, federal securities law, and seek damages for alleged losses that those funds suffered because of their purchases of BP ordinary shares and/or ADSs. All the cases, with the exception of one case that has been stayed, have been transferred to MDL 2185. In August and September 2015, plaintiffs filed or sought leave to file amended complaints in those cases. On 4 January 2016, the district court dismissed two of those cases and some of the claims of a third case with leave to replead by 19 January 2016. Plaintiffs in the two dismissed cases filed amended complaints on 19 January 2016.
Canadian class action
On 15 November 2012, a plaintiff re-filed a statement of claim against BP in Ontario, Canada, seeking to assert claims under Canadian law against BP on behalf of a class of Canadian residents who allegedly suffered losses because of their purchase of BP ordinary shares and ADSs. On 14 August 2014, the Ontario Court of Appeal held that the claims made on behalf of Canadian residents who purchased BP ordinary shares and ADSs on exchanges outside of Canada should be litigated in those countries, and granted leave for the plaintiff to amend the complaint to assert claims only on behalf of Canadian residents who purchased ADSs on the Toronto Stock Exchange. On 26 March 2015, the Supreme Court of Canada dismissed the plaintiffs appeal of this decision. Plaintiff has not amended his complaint to assert claims on behalf of Canadian residents who purchased ADSs on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and thus there have been no further proceedings in the case. On 27 March 2015, the plaintiff filed a complaint in Texas federal court asserting claims under Canadian law against BP on behalf of a class of Canadian residents who allegedly suffered losses because of their purchase of BP ADSs on the New York Stock Exchange. That action was transferred to MDL 2185 and was dismissed by the district court on 25 September 2015. The time to appeal that dismissal has expired.
Dividend-related proceedings
On 11 May 2015, the Fifth Circuit affirmed a district court decision in June 2014 dismissing an action against BP p.l.c. for cancelling its dividend payments in June 2010 on the grounds that the courts of England were the more appropriate forum for the litigation. This followed earlier unsuccessful lawsuits against BP p.l.c. for the 2010 dividend payment cancellation.
ERISA
On 15 January 2015, following an earlier dismissal in the ERISA case related to BP share funds in several employee benefit savings plans, the district court allowed the plaintiffs to amend their complaint to allege some of their proposed claims against certain defendants. The district court certified that decision for appeal, and the Fifth Circuit accepted that appeal on 20 May 2015. Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on 12 February 2015. On 30 October 2015, the district court granted defendants partial motion to dismiss, dismissing some of the claims in the amended complaint.
Other Deepwater Horizon oil spill related claims
Other civil complaints
On 26 August 2011, the district court in MDL 2179 granted in part BPs motion to dismiss a master complaint raising claims for economic loss by private plaintiffs, dismissing the plaintiffs state law claims and limiting the types of maritime law claims the plaintiffs may pursue, but also held that certain classes of claimants may seek punitive damages under general maritime law. On 30 September 2011, the court granted in part BPs motion to dismiss a master complaint asserting personal injury claims on behalf of persons exposed to crude oil or chemical dispersants, including state law claims, claims for punitive damages and claims for medical monitoring damages. In each case the court did not, however, lift an earlier stay on the underlying individual complaints raising those claims or otherwise apply its dismissal of the master complaints to those individual complaints.
On 4 September 2015, the district court in MDL 2179 issued an order directing the clerk to docket no further joinders by plaintiffs in the two master complaints for private plaintiff economic and property damages claims and for medical claims.
On 14 September 2015, the district court granted BPs motion for summary judgment and issued a judgment dismissing with prejudice the Center for Biological Diversitys claim against BP under the Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act. This followed an earlier unsuccessful appeal against the dismissal of the other action brought against BP by the Center for Biological Diversity. On 8 October 2015, the Center for Biological Diversity filed a motion asking the district court to reconsider its 14 September 2015 order. That motion was denied on 4 December 2015.
Non-US government lawsuits
On 1 May 2015, the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district courts dismissal with prejudice of the claims brought in September 2010 by three Mexican states bordering the Gulf of Mexico (Veracruz, Quintana Roo and Tamaulipas) against several BP entities. The lawsuits allege that the Incident harmed their tourism, fishing and commercial shipping industries (resulting in, among other things, diminished tax revenue), damaged natural resources and the environment and caused the states to incur expenses in preparing a response to the Incident. On 30 July 2015, the three Mexican states filed a petition for certiorari to the US Supreme Court, which was denied on 30 November 2015.
On 5 April 2011, the Mexican State of Yucatan submitted a claim to the Gulf Coast Claims Facility (GCCF) alleging potential damage to its natural resources and environment, and seeking to recover the cost of assessing the alleged damage. This was followed by a suit against BP which was transferred to MDL 2179.
On 19 April 2013, the Mexican federal government filed a civil action against BP and others in MDL 2179. The complaint seeks a determination that each defendant bears liability under OPA 90 for damages that include the costs of responding to the spill; natural resource damages allegedly recoverable by Mexico as an OPA 90 trustee; and the net loss of taxes, royalties, fees or net profits.
On 18 October 2012, before a Mexican Federal District Court located in Mexico City, a class action complaint was filed against BPXP, BPAPC, and other BP subsidiaries. The plaintiffs, consisting of fishermen and other groups, are seeking, among other things, compensatory damages for the class members who allegedly suffered economic losses, as well as an order requiring BP to remediate environmental damage resulting from the Incident, to provide funding for the preservation of the environment and to conduct environmental impact studies in the Gulf of Mexico for the next 10 years. After initial dismissal of the action, it was reported in December 2015 that the action was reinstated after appeal, although BP has not been formally served with the action.
False Claims Act actions
On 17 December 2012, the court ordered unsealed one complaint that had been filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana by an individual under the Qui Tam (whistle-blower) provisions of the False Claims Act (FCA). The complaint alleged that BP and another defendant had made false reports and certifications of the amount of oil released into the Gulf of Mexico following the Incident. On 17 December 2012, the DoJ filed with the court a notice that the DoJ elected to decline
240 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
to intervene in the action. On 31 January 2013, the complaint was transferred to MDL 2179. Under the terms of the proposed Consent Decree, the United States and Gulf states would covenant not to pursue claims against BP under the FCA.
Criminal settlement with the DoJ and settlement with the SEC
On 15 November 2012, BP announced that it reached agreement with the US government, subject to court approval, to resolve all federal criminal charges and all claims by the SEC against BP arising from the Deepwater Horizon accident, oil spill and response.
On 29 January 2013, the US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana accepted BPs pleas regarding the federal criminal charges, and sentenced BP in connection with the criminal plea agreement. Pursuant to that sentence, BP is required to pay $4 billion, including $1,256 million in criminal fines, in instalments over five years. Under the terms of the criminal plea agreement, a total of $2,394 million is required to be paid to the National Fish & Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) over five years. In addition, $350 million is required to be paid to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) over five years. BP made its required payments that were due in March and April 2013, January 2014, January 2015 and January 2016 totalling $2.1 billion. BP was required to serve a term of five years probation and agree to certain equitable relief relating to BPs risk management processes in order to further enhance the safety of drilling operations in the Gulf of Mexico. BP also agreed to maintain a real-time drilling operations monitoring centre and to undertake several initiatives with academia and regulators to develop new technologies related to deepwater drilling safety. The resolution also provided for the appointment of two monitors, a process safety monitor, to review and provide recommendations concerning BPXPs process safety and risk management procedures for deepwater drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and an ethics monitor, to review and provide recommendations concerning BPs ethics and compliance programme. BP has also agreed to retain an independent third-party auditor to review and report to the probation officer, the DoJ and BP regarding BPXPs compliance with the key terms of the plea agreement. Under the plea agreement, BP has also agreed to co-operate in ongoing criminal actions and investigations, including prosecutions of four former employees who have been separately charged.
In its resolution with the SEC, BP has resolved the SECs Deepwater Horizon-related claims against the company under Sections 10(b) and 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the associated rules. BP agreed to a civil penalty of $525 million, the last instalment of which was paid in August 2014, and consented to the entry of an injunction prohibiting it from violating certain US securities laws and regulations.
US Environmental Protection Agency matters
On 13 March 2014, BP, BPXP, and all other temporarily suspended BP entities entered into an administrative agreement with the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) resolving all issues related to suspension or debarment arising from the Incident. Under the terms and conditions of the administrative agreement, which will apply until 13 March 2019, BP may enter into new contracts or leases with the US government but must comply with a set of safety and operations, ethics and compliance and corporate governance requirements.
US Department of Interior matters
On 12 October 2011, the US Department of the Interior Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement issued to BP, Transocean, and Halliburton Notification of Incidents of Noncompliance (INCs). The notification issued to BP is for a number of alleged regulatory violations concerning Macondo well operations. On 7 December 2011, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement issued to BP a second INC for five alleged violations related to drilling and abandonment operations at the Macondo well. BP filed an administrative appeal with respect to the first and second INCs and filed a joint stay of proceedings with the Department of Interior with respect to both INCs. Pursuant to the proposed Consent Decree with the United States (see above), if entered by the court, BP would withdraw its appeals within 15 days of the effective date of the Consent Decree, and the INCs would then be fully and finally resolved.
Pending investigations and reports relating to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill CSB investigation
The US Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (CSB) has indicated that it plans to release the final two volumes of its four-volume report on its investigation into the Incident (concerning the role of the regulator in the oversight of the offshore industry and organizational and cultural factors) in March 2016.
Other legal proceedings
FERC and CFTC matters
The US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) have been investigating several BP entities regarding trading in the next-day natural gas market at Houston Ship Channel in 2008. On 5 August 2013, the FERC issued an Order to Show Cause and Notice of Proposed Penalty directing BP to respond to a FERC Enforcement Staff report alleging that BP manipulated the next-day, fixed price gas market at Houston Ship Channel from mid-September 2008 to 30 November 2008. The FERC Enforcement Staff report proposed a civil penalty of $28 million and the surrender of $800,000 of alleged profits. The Administrative Law Judge ruled on 13 August 2015 that BP manipulated the market by selling next-day, fixed price natural gas at Houston Ship Channel in 2008 in order to suppress the Gas Daily index and benefit its financial position. BP filed an appeal to the initial decision with the FERC on 14 September 2015 and the Office of Enforcement filed an opposing brief on 5 October 2015.
Canadian Pipeline Nominations
The CFTC is currently investigating certain practices relating to crude oil pipeline nominations procedures on Canadian pipelines. On 17 November 2014, the CFTC Enforcement Staff notified BP that it intends to recommend an enforcement action naming certain parties, including several BP entities, alleging violations of the anti-fraud and false reporting provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act in connection with these nomination procedures and related trades. On 17 December 2014 BP submitted a detailed defence responding to the allegations in the notice and challenging the CFTCs jurisdiction over the alleged conduct.
Investigations by the FERC and CFTC into BPs trading activities continue to be conducted from time to time.
CSB matters
In March 2007, the CSB issued a report on the March 2005 explosion and fire at the Texas City refinery incident. The report contained recommendations to the BP Texas City refinery and to the board of directors of BP. To date, the CSB has accepted that all but one of BPs responses to its recommendations have been satisfactorily addressed. BP and the CSB are continuing to discuss the remaining open recommendation with the objective of the CSB agreeing to accept this as satisfactorily addressed as well.
OSHA matters
On 4 March 2014, BP and the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) reached agreement in relation to the remaining 30 citations issued by OSHA to the Texas City refinery in 2009 related to the Process Safety Management (PSM) standard. This followed an earlier settlement of approximately 400 Texas City citations. The agreement links the outcome of these citations to the ultimate outcome of certain specified Toledo citations which address similar issues (see below). If the 31 July 2013 decision of the Administrative Law Judge in relation to the similar Toledo issues is ultimately upheld when a final decision is entered, OSHA has agreed to dismiss the remaining Texas City citations. If the 31 July 2013 decision is ultimately overturned, BP has agreed to pay a penalty not exceeding $1 million to resolve the remaining Texas City citations.
On 8 March 2010, OSHA issued 65 citations to BP Products North America Inc. (BP Products) and BP- Husky Refining LLC (BP-Husky) for alleged violations of the PSM standard at the Toledo refinery, with penalties of approximately $3 million. These citations resulted from an inspection conducted pursuant to OSHAs Petroleum Refinery Process Safety Management National Emphasis Program. Both BP Products and BP-Husky contested the citations. The outcome of a pre-trial settlement of a number of the citations and a trial of the remainder was a reduction in the total penalty in respect of the citations from the original amount of approximately $3 million to $80,000. The OSH Review Commission
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 241 |
granted OSHAs petition for review and briefing was completed in the first half of 2014. The Review Commission is not expected to issue its decision until later this year at the earliest.
Prudhoe Bay leak
In March and August 2006, oil leaked from oil transit pipelines operated by BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. (BPXA) at the Prudhoe Bay unit on the North Slope of Alaska. On 12 May 2008, a BP p.l.c. shareholder filed a consolidated complaint alleging violations of federal securities law on behalf of a putative class of BP p.l.c. shareholders, based on alleged misrepresentations concerning the integrity of the Prudhoe Bay pipeline before its shutdown on 6 August 2006. On 7 December 2015, the complaint was dismissed with prejudice. On 5 January 2016, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal of that decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Lead paint matters
Since 1987, Atlantic Richfield Company (Atlantic Richfield), a subsidiary * of BP, has been named as a co-defendant in numerous lawsuits brought in the US alleging injury to persons and property caused by lead pigment in paint. The majority of the lawsuits have been abandoned or dismissed against Atlantic Richfield. Atlantic Richfield is named in these lawsuits as alleged successor to International Smelting and Refining and another company that manufactured lead pigment during the period 1920-1946. The plaintiffs include individuals and governmental entities. Several of the lawsuits purport to be class actions. The lawsuits seek various remedies including compensation to lead-poisoned children, cost to find and remove lead paint from buildings, medical monitoring and screening programmes, public warning and education of lead hazards, reimbursement of government healthcare costs and special education for lead-poisoned citizens and punitive damages. No lawsuit against Atlantic Richfield has been settled nor has Atlantic Richfield been subject to a final adverse judgment in any proceeding. The amounts claimed and, if such suits were successful, the costs of implementing the remedies sought in the various cases could be substantial. While it is not possible to predict the outcome of these legal actions, Atlantic Richfield believes that it has valid defences. It intends to defend such actions vigorously and believes that the incurrence of liability is remote. Consequently, BP believes that the impact of these lawsuits on the groups results, financial position or liquidity will not be material.
Abbott Atlantis related matters
In April 2009, Kenneth Abbott, as relator, filed a US False Claims Act lawsuit against BP, alleging that BP violated federal regulations, and made false statements in connection with its compliance with those regulations, by failing to have necessary documentation for the Atlantis subsea and other systems. BP is the operator and 56% interest owner of the Atlantis unit which is in production in the Gulf of Mexico. On 21 August 2014, the court granted BPs motions for summary judgment. On 28 August 2014, the court entered final judgment in favour of BP. In September 2014 the plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration, which BP opposed. On 18 December 2015, the judge denied plaintiffs motion for reconsideration. On 8 January 2016, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal.
EC investigation and related matters
On 14 May 2013, European Commission officials made a series of unannounced inspections at the offices of BP and other companies involved in the oil industry acting on concerns that anticompetitive practices may have occurred in connection with oil price reporting practices and the reference price assessment process. Related inquiries and requests for information were also received from US and other regulators following the European Commissions actions, including from the Japanese Fair Trade Commission, the Korean Fair Trade Commission, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the CFTC. On 1 October 2014, BP was informed by the FTC that it was closing its investigation. On 7 December 2015, the European Commission confirmed that it has dropped BP from its investigation.
In addition, 15 purported class actions related to these matters have been filed in US district courts alleging manipulation and antitrust violations under the Commodity Exchange Act and US antitrust laws, and these purported class actions have been consolidated in federal court in New York.
California False Claims Act matters
On 4 November 2014 the California Attorney General filed a notice in California state court that it was intervening in a previously-sealed California False Claims Act (CFCA) lawsuit filed by relator Christopher Schroen against BP, BP Energy Company, BP Corporation North America Inc., BP Products and BPAPC. On 7 January 2015, the California Attorney General filed a complaint in intervention alleging that BP violated the CFCA and the California Unfair Competition Law by falsely and fraudulently overcharging California state entities for natural gas. The relators complaint makes similar allegations, in addition to individual claims. The complaints seek treble damages, punitive damages, penalties and injunctive relief. On 9 April 2015, the BP defendants filed a demurrer, motion to strike and motion to dismiss (forum non conveniens) to the relators claims that were not adopted in the Attorney Generals complaint, which was denied on 10 June 2015. BP filed additional demurrers to the Attorney Generals and the relators complaints, which were granted in part and denied in part on 14 August 2015. On 22 September 2015, BP filed its answer and affirmative defenses. Trial is scheduled to commence on 10 July 2017.
Scharfstein v. BP West Coast Products, LLC
A purported class action lawsuit was filed against BP West Coast Products, LLC in Oregon State Court under the Oregon Unlawful Trade Practices Act on behalf of customers who used a debit card at ARCO gasoline stations in Oregon during the period 1 January 2011 to 30 August 2013, alleging that ARCOs Oregon sites failed to provide sufficient notice of the 35 cents per transaction debit card fee. After a jury trial and subsequent hearing, in 2014 the jury rendered a verdict against BP and determined that statutory damages of $200 per class member should be awarded. On 25 August 2015, the court determined the size of the class to be slightly in excess of two million members. BP intends to appeal. No provision has been made for damages arising out of this class action.
See Financial statements Note 32 for additional information on the groups legal proceedings.
During the period covered by this report, non-US subsidiaries, or other non-US entities of BP, conducted limited activities in, or with persons from, certain countries identified by the US Department of State as State Sponsors of Terrorism or otherwise subject to US and EU sanctions (Sanctioned Countries). Sanctions restrictions continue to be insignificant to the groups financial condition and results of operations. BP monitors its activities with Sanctioned Countries, persons from Sanctioned Countries and individuals and companies subject to US and EU sanctions and seeks to comply with applicable sanctions laws and regulations.
The US and the EU sanctions against Iran that were in place in 2015 included: in the US, sanctions against persons involved with Irans energy, shipping and petrochemicals industries, and sanctions against financial institutions that engage in significant transactions with the Iran Central Bank; and in the EU, a prohibition on the import, purchase and transport of Iranian-origin crude oil, petroleum products and natural gas. Additionally, the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012 (ITRA) added Section 13(r) to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and requires that issuers must file annual or quarterly reports under the Exchange Act to disclose in such reports whether, during the period covered by the report, the registrant or its affiliates have knowingly engaged in certain, principally Iran-related, activities.
The US and the EU implemented temporary, limited and reversible relief of certain sanctions related to Iran pursuant to a Joint Plan of Action (JPOA) entered by Iran, China, France, Germany, Russia, the UK and the US with effect from 20 January 2014 and in July 2015, these countries agreed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). Following the JCPOA, BP representatives visited Iran, met Iranian government officials and met other Iranian nationals. Such meetings were introductory in nature with a view to considering possible future business opportunities.
Following confirmation by the International Atomic Energy Agency on 16 January 2016 (Implementation Day) that Iran had fully implemented the JCPOA measures necessary for sanctions relief, the European Union
242 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
and the United States lifted certain nuclear related sanctions, with the EU lifting nuclear related primary sanctions and the United States suspending nuclear related secondary sanctions. BP will consider future business opportunities in relation to Iran and engage in discussions with Iranian government officials and other Iranian nationals, insofar as this is in compliance with applicable sanctions.
BP has interests in and operates the North Sea Rhum field (Rhum) and the Azerbaijan Shah Deniz field (Shah Deniz), in which Naftiran Intertrade Co. Limited and NICO SPV Limited (collectively, NICO) or Iranian Oil Company (U.K.) Limited (IOC UK) have interests. Additionally, BP has interests in a gas marketing entity and a gas pipeline entity in which NICO or IOC UK have interests, although both entities (and their related assets) are located outside Iran. Production was suspended at Rhum (in which IOC UK has a 50% interest) in November 2010. On 22 October 2013, the UK government announced a temporary management scheme (the Temporary Scheme) under The Hydrocarbon (Temporary Management Scheme) Regulations 2013, under which the UK government assumed control of and managed IOC UKs interest in the Rhum field, thereby permitting Rhum operations to recommence in accordance with applicable EU regulations and in compliance with a licence from OFAC. Operations at the Rhum gas field recommenced in mid-October 2014. Following Implementation Day, the Temporary Management Scheme will cease and BP has applied for an amended OFAC licence. In the meantime, operations have continued at Rhum.
Shah Deniz, its gas marketing entity and the gas pipeline entity (in which NICO has a 10% or less non-operating interest) continue in operation. The Shah Deniz joint operation * and its gas marketing and pipeline entities were excluded from the main operative provisions of the EU regulations as well as from the application of the US sanctions, and fall within the exception for certain natural gas projects under Section 603 of ITRA.
BP has no current operating activities in Iran. BP holds an interest in a non-BP operated Indian joint venture * which sold crude oil to an Indian entity in which NICO holds a minority, non-controlling stake. Those sales had ceased in January 2014 but resumed in 2015.
Both the US and the EU have enacted strong sanctions against Syria, including a prohibition on the purchase of Syrian-origin crude and a US prohibition on the provision of services to Syria by US persons. The EU sanctions against Syria include a prohibition on supplying certain equipment used in the production, refining, or liquefaction of petroleum resources, as well as restrictions on dealing with the Central Bank of Syria and numerous other Syrian financial institutions.
Following the imposition in 2011 of further US and EU sanctions against Syria, BP terminated all sales of crude oil and petroleum products into Syria, though BP continues to supply aviation fuel to non-governmental Syrian resellers outside of Syria.
BP has equity interests in non-operated joint arrangements with air fuel sellers, resellers, and fuel delivery services around the world. From time to time, the joint arrangement operator or other partners may sell or deliver fuel to airlines from Sanctioned Countries or flights to Sanctioned Countries without BPs prior knowledge or consent. BP has registered and paid required fees for patents and trade marks in Sanctioned Countries.
BP sells lubricants in Cuba through a 50:50 joint arrangement and trades in small quantities of lubricants.
During 2014 the US and the EU imposed sanctions on certain Russian activities, individuals and entities, including Rosneft. Certain sectoral sanctions also apply to entities owned 50% or more by entities on the relevant sectoral sanctions list. Ruhr Oel GmbH (ROG) is a 50:50 joint operation with Rosneft, operated by BP, which holds interests in a number of refineries in Germany. To date, these sanctions have had no material adverse impact on BP or ROG. On 15 January 2016 BP announced that it had signed definitive agreements with Rosneft to dissolve ROG.
Disclosure pursuant to Section 219 of ITRA
To our knowledge, none of BPs activities, transactions or dealings are required to be disclosed pursuant to ITRA Section 219, with the following possible exception:
Rhum, located in the UK sector of the North Sea, is operated by BP Exploration Operating Company Limited (BPEOC), a non-US subsidiary of BP. Rhum is owned under a 50:50 unincorporated joint arrangement between BPEOC and Iranian Oil Company (U.K.) Limited (IOC). The Rhum joint arrangement was originally formed in 1974. During the period of production from the field, the Rhum joint arrangement supplied natural gas and certain associated liquids to the UK. On 16 November 2010, production from Rhum was suspended in response to relevant EU sanctions. Operations at the Rhum gas field recommenced in mid-October 2014 in accordance with the UK governments Temporary Scheme (see above). During the year ended 31 December 2015, BP recorded gross revenues of $104.5 million related to its interests in Rhum. BP had a net profit of $88.7 million for the year ended 31 December 2015, including an impairment reversal of $67.6 million in the fourth quarter of 2015.
BP currently intends to continue to hold its ownership stake in the Rhum joint arrangement and act as operator.
On 13 March 2014, BP, BP Exploration & Production Inc., and other BP entities entered into an administrative agreement with the US Environmental Protection Agency, which resolved all issues related to the suspension or debarment of BP entities arising from the 20 April 2010 explosions and fire on the semi-submersible rig Deepwater Horizon and resulting oil spill. The administrative agreement allows BP entities to enter into new contracts or leases with the US government. Under the terms and conditions of this agreement, which will apply for five years, BP has agreed to a set of safety and operations, ethics and compliance and corporate governance requirements. The agreement is governed by federal law.
BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP Corporation North America Inc., BP p.l.c., the United States and the states of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas (the Gulf states) entered into a proposed Consent Decree to fully and finally resolve any and all natural resource damages (NRD) claims of the United States, the Gulf states, and their respective natural resource trustees and all Clean Water Act (CWA) penalty claims, and certain other claims of the United States and the Gulf states. The United States lodged the proposed Consent Decree with the district court in MDL 2179 on 5 October 2015.
Concurrently, BP entered into a definitive Settlement Agreement with the Gulf states (Settlement Agreement) with respect to State claims for economic, property and other losses.
The proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement are conditional upon each other and neither will become effective unless there is final court approval of the Consent Decree. BP has filed the proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement as exhibits to its Annual Report on Form 20-F 2015 filed with the SEC. For further details of the proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement, see Legal proceedings on page 238.
BP has freehold and leasehold interests in real estate and other tangible assets in numerous countries, but no individual property is significant to the group as a whole. For more on the significant subsidiaries of the group at 31 December 2015 and the group percentage of ordinary share capital see Financial statements Note 36. For information on significant joint ventures and associates * of the group see Financial statements Notes 15 and 16.
Transactions between the group and its significant joint ventures and associates are summarized in Financial statements Note 15 and Note 16. In the ordinary course of its business, the group enters into transactions with various organizations with which some of its directors
* Defined on page 256. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 243 |
or executive officers are associated. Except as described in this report, the group did not have material transactions or transactions of an unusual nature with, and did not make loans to, related parties in the period commencing 1 January 2015 to 16 February 2016.
Corporate governance practices
In the US, BP ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The significant differences between BPs corporate governance practices as a UK company and those required by NYSE listing standards for US companies are listed as follows:
Independence
BP has adopted a robust set of board governance principles, which reflect the UK Corporate Governance Code and its principles-based approach to corporate governance. As such, the way in which BP makes determinations of directors independence differs from the NYSE rules.
BPs board governance principles require that all non-executive directors be determined by the board to be independent in character and judgement and free from any business or other relationship which could materially interfere with the exercise of their judgement. The BP board has determined that, in its judgement, all of the non-executive directors are independent. In doing so, however, the board did not explicitly take into consideration the independence requirements outlined in the NYSEs listing standards.
Committees
BP has a number of board committees that are broadly comparable in purpose and composition to those required by NYSE rules for domestic US companies. For instance, BP has a chairmans (rather than executive) committee, nomination (rather than nominating/corporate governance) committee and remuneration (rather than compensation) committee. BP also has an audit committee, which NYSE rules require for both US companies and foreign private issuers. These committees are composed solely of non-executive directors whom the board has determined to be independent, in the manner described above.
The BP board governance principles prescribe the composition, main tasks and requirements of each of the committees (see the board committee reports on pages 68-75). BP has not, therefore, adopted separate charters for each committee.
Under US securities law and the listing standards of the NYSE, BP is required to have an audit committee that satisfies the requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and Section 303A.06 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. BPs audit committee complies with these requirements. The BP audit committee does not have direct responsibility for the appointment, re-appointment or removal of the independent auditors instead, it follows the UK Companies Act 2006 by making recommendations to the board on these matters for it to put forward for shareholder approval at the AGM.
One of the NYSEs additional requirements for the audit committee states that at least one member of the audit committee is to have accounting or related financial management expertise. The board determined that Brendan Nelson possessed such expertise and also possesses the financial and audit committee experiences set forth in both the UK Corporate Governance Code and SEC rules (see Audit committee report on page 68). Mr Nelson is the audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 16A of Form 20-F.
Shareholder approval of equity compensation plans
The NYSE rules for US companies require that shareholders must be given the opportunity to vote on all equity-compensation plans and material revisions to those plans. BP complies with UK requirements that are similar to the NYSE rules. The board, however, does not explicitly take into consideration the NYSEs detailed definition of what are considered material revisions.
Code of ethics
The NYSE rules require that US companies adopt and disclose a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers and employees. BP has adopted a code of conduct, which applies to all employees and members of the board, and has board governance principles that address
the conduct of directors. In addition BP has adopted a code of ethics for senior financial officers as required by the SEC. BP considers that these codes and policies address the matters specified in the NYSE rules for US companies.
The company has adopted a code of ethics for its group chief executive, chief financial officer, group controller, general auditor and chief accounting officer as required by the provisions of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules issued by the SEC. There have been no waivers from the code of ethics relating to any officers.
BP also has a code of conduct, which is applicable to all employees, officers and members of the board. This was updated (and published) in July 2014.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures
The company maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports the company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the companys group chief executive and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, our management, including the group chief executive and chief financial officer, recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. Further, in the design and evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures our management necessarily was required to apply its judgement in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Also, we have investments in certain unconsolidated entities. As we do not control these entities, our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to such entities are necessarily substantially more limited than those we maintain with respect to our consolidated subsidiaries. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. The companys disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet, and management believes that they meet, reasonable assurance standards.
The companys management, with the participation of the companys group chief executive and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation, the group chief executive and chief financial officer have concluded that the companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level.
Managements report on internal control over financial reporting
Management of BP is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. BPs internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the principal executive and financial officers to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of BPs financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with IFRS.
As of the end of the 2015 fiscal year, management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the UK Financial Reporting Councils Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting. Based on this assessment, management has
244 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
determined that BPs internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2015 was effective.
The companys internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurances that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of BP; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of BPs assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements. BPs internal control over financial reporting as of 31 December 2015 has been audited by Ernst & Young, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing on page 101 of BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 .
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
There were no changes in the groups internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the Form 20-F that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.
Principal accountants fees and services
The audit committee has established policies and procedures for the engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, to render audit and certain assurance and tax services. The policies provide for pre-approval by the audit committee of specifically defined audit, audit-related, tax and other services that are not prohibited by regulatory or other professional requirements. Ernst & Young are engaged for these services when its expertise and experience of BP are important. Most of this work is of an audit nature. Tax services were awarded either through a full competitive tender process or following an assessment of the expertise of Ernst & Young relative to that of other potential service providers. These services are for a fixed term.
Under the policy, pre-approval is given for specific services within the following categories: advice on accounting, auditing and financial reporting matters; internal accounting and risk management control reviews (excluding any services relating to information systems design and implementation); non-statutory audit; project assurance and advice on business and accounting process improvement (excluding any services relating to information systems design and implementation relating to BPs financial statements or accounting records); due diligence in connection with acquisitions, disposals and joint arrangements * (excluding valuation or involvement in prospective financial information); income tax and indirect tax compliance and advisory services; employee tax services (excluding tax services that could impair independence); provision of, or access to, Ernst & Young publications, workshops, seminars and other training materials; provision of reports from data gathered on non-financial policies and information; and assistance with understanding non-financial regulatory requirements. BP operates a two-tier system for audit and non-audit services. For audit related services, the audit committee has a pre-approved aggregate level, within which specific work may be approved by management. Non-audit services, including tax services, are pre-approved for management to authorize per individual engagement, but above a defined level must be approved by the chairman of the audit committee or the full committee. The audit committee has delegated to the chairman of the audit committee authority to approve permitted services provided that the chairman reports any decisions to the committee at its next scheduled meeting. Any proposed service not included in the approved service list must be approved in advance by the audit committee chairman and reported to the committee, or approved by the full audit committee in advance of commencement of the engagement.
The audit committee evaluates the performance of the auditors each year. The audit fees payable to Ernst & Young are reviewed by the committee in the context of other global companies for cost effectiveness. The committee keeps under review the scope and results of audit work and the independence and objectivity of the auditors. External regulation and BP policy requires the auditors to rotate their lead
audit partner every five years. (See Financial statements Note 35 and Audit committee report on page 68 for details of fees for services provided by auditors.)
This section of BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 forms part of, and includes certain disclosures which are required by law to be included in, the Directors report.
Indemnity provisions
In accordance with BPs Articles of Association, on appointment each director is granted an indemnity from the company in respect of liabilities incurred as a result of their office, to the extent permitted by law. These indemnities were in force throughout the financial year and at the date of this report. In respect of those liabilities for which directors may not be indemnified, the company maintained a directors and officers liability insurance policy throughout 2015. During the year, a review of the terms and scope of the policy was undertaken. The policy was renewed during 2015 and continued into 2016. Although their defence costs may be met, neither the companys indemnity nor insurance provides cover in the event that the director is proved to have acted fraudulently or dishonestly. Certain subsidiaries are trustees of the groups pension schemes. Each director of these subsidiaries * is granted an indemnity from the company in respect of liabilities incurred as a result of such a subsidiarys activities as a trustee of the pension scheme, to the extent permitted by law. These indemnities were in force throughout the financial year and at the date of this report.
Financial risk management objectives and policies
The disclosures in relation to financial risk management objectives and policies, including the policy for hedging, are included in Our management of risk on page 51-52, Liquidity and capital resources on page 219 and Financial statements Notes 28 and 29.
Exposure to price risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and cash flow risk
The disclosures in relation to exposure to price risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and cash flow risk are included in Financial statements Note 28.
Important events since the end of the financial year
Disclosures of the particulars of the important events affecting BP which have occurred since the end of the financial year are included in the Strategic report as well as in other places in the Directors report.
Likely future developments in the business
An indication of the likely future developments of the business is included in the Strategic report.
Research and development
An indication of the activities of the company in the field of research and development is included in Our business model and strategy on pages 12-17.
Branches
As a global group our interests and activities are held or operated through subsidiaries, branches, joint arrangements * or associates * established in and subject to the laws and regulations of many different jurisdictions.
Employees
The disclosures concerning policies in relation to the employment of disabled persons and employee involvement are included in Corporate responsibility Employees on pages 49-50.
Employee share schemes
Certain shares held as a result of participation in some employee share plans carry voting rights. Voting rights in respect of such shares are exercisable via a nominee. Dividend waivers are in place in respect of unallocated shares held in employee share plan trusts.
Change of control provisions
On 5 October 2015, the United States lodged with the district court in MDL 2179 a proposed Consent Decree between the United States, the Gulf states, BP Exploration & Production Inc., BP Corporation North America Inc. and BP p.l.c., to fully and finally resolve any and all natural resource damages claims of the United States, the Gulf states and their respective natural resource trustees and all Clean Water Act penalty claims, and certain other claims of the United States and the Gulf states. Concurrently, BP entered into a definitive Settlement Agreement with the five Gulf states (Settlement Agreement) with respect to state claims for economic, property and other losses. The proposed Consent Decree
* Defined on page 256. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 245 |
and the Settlement Agreement are conditional upon each other and neither will become effective unless there is final court approval of the Consent Decree. The United States is expected to file a motion with the court to enter the Consent Decree as a final settlement around the end of March, which the court will then consider. The federal government and the Gulf states may jointly elect to accelerate the payments under the Consent Decree in the event of a change of control or insolvency of BP p.l.c., and the Gulf states individually have similar acceleration rights under the Settlement Agreement. For further details of the proposed Consent Decree and the Settlement Agreement, see Legal proceedings on page 238.
Greenhouse gas emissions
The disclosures in relation to greenhouse gas emissions are included in Corporate responsibility Environment and society on page 46.
Disclosures required under Listing Rule 9.8.4R
The information required to be disclosed by Listing Rule 9.8.4R can be located as set out below:
Information required | Page | |||
(1) Amount of interest capitalized |
128 | |||
(2) (11) |
Not applicable | |||
(12), (13) Dividend waivers |
245 | |||
(14) |
Not applicable | |||
|
In order to utilize the safe harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the PSLRA), BP is providing the following cautionary statement. This document contains certain forecasts, projections and forward-looking statements that is, statements related to future, not past events with respect to the financial condition, results of operations and businesses of BP and certain of the plans and objectives of BP with respect to these items. These statements may generally, but not always, be identified by the use of words such as will, expects, is expected to, aims, should, may, objective, is likely to, intends, believes, anticipates, plans, we see or similar expressions. In particular, among other statements, (i) certain statements in the Chairmans letter (pages 6-7), the Group chief executives letter (pages 8-9), the Strategic report (pages 1-54), Additional disclosures (pages 215-246) and Shareholder information (pages 247-258), including but not limited to statements under the headings Our market outlook, Our business model and strategy, Beyond 2035, Our distinctive capabilities and Lower oil and gas prices and including but not limited to statements regarding plans and prospects relating to future value creation, long-term growth, capital discipline and growth in sustainable free cash flow and shareholder distributions; future dividend and optional scrip dividend payments; expectations regarding the effective tax rate in 2016; future working capital and cash management and the net debt ratio; our intention to maintain a strong cash position; expected payments under contractual and commercial commitments and purchase obligations; our aim to rebalance our sources and uses of cash by 2017; expectations regarding our ability to respond to the current low oil price environment; plans and expectations regarding capital expenditure, reduction in our cost base and cash costs, divestments and gearing in 2016 and beyond; plans to reduce our workforce and third-party spend in the near term; expectations regarding underlying production and capital investment in 2016; plans to invest in a balanced range of resources and geographies; plans and expectations regarding the settlement of legal exposures relating to the Deepwater Horizon incident and the court approval thereof; plans regarding production and value creation from new projects including at Shah Deniz 2 in Azerbaijan and Khazzan in Oman; expectations regarding the future level of oil and gas prices and industry product supply, demand and pricing in the near and long term, demographic changes and their effect on demand for energy and our outlook and projections of future energy trends, including the role of oil, gas and renewables therein; plans to strengthen our portfolio of high-return and longer-life assets and improve operations; plans to form key partnerships and relationships with governments, customers, partners, communities, suppliers and other institutions; expectations regarding advances in technology including from research at the BP International Centre for Advanced Materials; plans to undertake joint exploration with Rosneft including in East Siberia, the West Siberian and Yenisey-Khatanga basins and the Volga-Urals region of Russia; expectations regarding future managed base decline and the current and future prospects of our discoveries, resources, reserves and positions; plans and expectations regarding the timing and composition of future projects, including with regard to the Atoll discovery in Egypt; expectations regarding the 2016 environment for refining and refinery turnarounds; plans to dissolve our German joint operation with Rosneft, to dispose of our Amsterdam oil terminal and to enter into joint ventures on certain midstream assets in North American and Australia; plans to roll out BP fuels with ACTIVE technology in Spain and additional markets in 2016; plans and expectations with regard to the strategic aims of Air BP and our lubricants business; expectations regarding improvements in operating performance and efficiency in the petrochemicals business; expectations regarding future safety performance
and plans to enhance safety, cybersecurity, compliance and risk management; the future strategy for and planned investments in renewable energy including investment in biobutanol; plans and expectations regarding the annual charges of Other business and corporate for 2016, the introduction of 28 deep-sea oil tankers and six LNG tankers into the BP-operated fleet between 2016 and 2019 and improvements in production, revenue and life of fields from investment in equipment and maintenance; expectations regarding the actions of contractors and partners and their terms of service; expectations regarding future environmental regulations and policy, their impact on our business and plans to reduce our environmental impact; our plans to work collaboratively with government regulators in planning for oil spill response and to implement its human rights policy; our planned disclosures regarding payments to governments in compliance with the EU Accounting Directive; plans to reduce activity and simplify processes in response to the current low oil price environment; our aim to develop the capabilities of its workforce with a focus on maintaining safe and reliable operations; our aim to maintain a diverse workforce, create an inclusive environment and ensure equal opportunity, including for women to represent 25% of group leaders by 2020; policies and goals related to risk management; expectations regarding future Upstream operations, including agreements or contracts with or relating to the Clair field, the Gulf of Mexico, Canada and the Canadian Beaufort Sea, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland; our joint ownership interests in exploration concessions and plans to drill therein; plans to transfer operatorship of certain fields; plans related to the Loyal field, the Culzean field, the North Sea and Alaska; plans and expectations regarding our equity interests and partnerships in Angola, Algeria, Libya and Egypt; plans and expectations regarding Western Indonesia, China, Azerbaijan, Oman, Abu Dhabi, India, Iraq and Russia; plans and expectations regarding our activities in Australia and Eastern Indonesia; projections regarding oil and gas reserves, including recovery and turnover time thereof; plans regarding compliance with environmental regulation; our plans and expectations regarding settlement of claims related to the Deepwater Horizon incident and related legal proceedings; and expectations regarding legal and trial proceedings, court decisions, potential investigations and civil actions by regulators, government entities and/or other entities or parties, and the risks associated with such proceedings and our intentions in respect thereof; and (ii) certain statements in Corporate governance (pages 55-75) and the Directors remuneration report (pages 76-92) with regard to the anticipated future composition of the board of directors; the boards goals and areas of focus stemming from the boards annual evaluation; plans regarding review of our governance policies in 2016, the timing of future audit contract tendering and areas of focus for the audit committee; and goals and areas of focus of board committees, including the Safety, ethics and environment assurance committee, the Geopolitical committee and the Chairmans and nomination committees; are all forward looking in nature.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that will or may occur in the future and are outside the control of BP. Actual results may differ materially from those expressed in such statements, depending on a variety of factors, including: the specific factors identified in the discussions accompanying such forward-looking statements; the receipt of relevant third party and/or regulatory approvals; the timing and level of maintenance and/or turnaround activity; the timing and volume of refinery additions and outages; the timing of bringing new fields onstream; the timing, quantum and nature of certain divestments; future levels of industry product supply, demand and pricing, including supply growth in North America; OPEC quota restrictions; production-sharing agreements effects; operational and safety problems; potential lapses in product quality; economic and financial market conditions generally or in various countries and regions; political stability and economic growth in relevant areas of the world; changes in laws and governmental regulations; regulatory or legal actions including the types of enforcement action pursued and the nature of remedies sought or imposed; the actions of prosecutors, regulatory authorities and courts; the timing and amount of future payments relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill; exchange rate fluctuations; development and use of new technology; recruitment and retention of a skilled workforce; the success or otherwise of partnering; the actions of competitors, trading partners, contractors, subcontractors, creditors, rating agencies and others; our access to future credit resources; business disruption and crisis management; the impact on our reputation of ethical misconduct and non-compliance with regulatory obligations; trading losses; major uninsured losses; decisions by Rosnefts management and board of directors; the actions of contractors; natural disasters and adverse weather conditions; changes in public expectations and other changes to business conditions; wars and acts of terrorism; cyberattacks or sabotage; and other factors discussed elsewhere in this report including under Risk factors (pages 53-54). In addition to factors set forth elsewhere in this report, those set out above are important factors, although not exhaustive, that may cause actual results and developments to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.
Statements regarding competitive position
Statements referring to our competitive position are based on the companys belief and, in some cases, rely on a range of sources, including investment analysts reports, independent market studies and our internal assessments of market share based on publicly available information about the financial results and performance of market participants.
246 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
248 | ||||
248 | ||||
249 | ||||
249 | ||||
251 | ||||
251 | ||||
251 | ||||
253 | Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers | |||
254 | ||||
254 | Fees and payments made by the Depositary to the issuer | |||
254 | ||||
255 | ||||
255 | ||||
255 |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 247 |
Markets and market prices
The primary market for BPs ordinary shares is the London Stock Exchange (LSE). BPs ordinary shares are a constituent element of the Financial Times Stock Exchange 100 Index. BPs ordinary shares are also traded on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange in Germany.
Trading of BPs shares on the LSE is primarily through the use of the Stock Exchange Electronic Trading Service (SETS), introduced in 1997 for the largest companies in terms of market capitalization whose primary listing is the LSE. Under SETS, buy and sell orders at specific prices may be sent electronically to the exchange by any firm that is a member of the LSE, on behalf of a client or on behalf of itself acting as a principal. The orders are then anonymously displayed in the order book. When there is a match on a buy and a sell order, the trade is executed and automatically reported to the LSE. Trading is continuous from 8.00am to 4.30pm UK time but, in the event of a 20% movement
in the share price either way, the LSE may impose a temporary halt in the trading of that companys shares in the order book to allow the market to re-establish equilibrium. Dealings in ordinary shares may also take place between an investor and a market-maker, via a member firm, outside the electronic order book.
In the US, BPs securities are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in the form of ADSs, for which JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is the depositary (the Depositary) and transfer agent. The Depositarys principal office is 4 New York Plaza, Floor 12, New York, NY, 10004, US. Each ADS represents six ordinary shares. ADSs are listed on the NYSE. ADSs are evidenced by American depositary receipts (ADRs), which may be issued in either certificated or book entry form.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the highest and lowest middle market quotations for BPs ordinary shares and ADSs for the periods shown. These are derived from the highest and lowest intra-day sales prices as reported on the LSE and NYSE, respectively.
Pence | Dollars | |||||||||||||||||
Ordinary shares | American depositary shares a | |||||||||||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||||
Year ended 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
514.90 | 361.25 | 49.50 | 33.62 | ||||||||||||||
2012 |
512.00 | 388.56 | 48.34 | 36.25 | ||||||||||||||
2013 |
494.20 | 426.50 | 48.65 | 39.99 | ||||||||||||||
2014 |
526.80 | 364.40 | 53.48 | 34.88 | ||||||||||||||
2015 |
484.15 | 322.90 | 43.60 | 29.38 | ||||||||||||||
Year ended 31 December |
||||||||||||||||||
2014: First quarter (January-March) |
510.00 | 462.64 | 51.02 | 45.83 | ||||||||||||||
Second quarter (April-June) |
526.80 | 467.10 | 53.48 | 47.14 | ||||||||||||||
Third quarter (July-September) |
525.80 | 440.72 | 53.48 | 43.80 | ||||||||||||||
Fourth quarter (October-December) |
455.45 | 364.40 | 44.14 | 34.88 | ||||||||||||||
2015: First quarter (January-March) |
457.10 | 382.15 | 41.93 | 35.67 | ||||||||||||||
Second quarter (April-June) |
484.15 | 420.15 | 43.60 | 39.50 | ||||||||||||||
Third quarter (July-September) |
437.40 | 322.90 | 41.29 | 29.38 | ||||||||||||||
Fourth quarter (October-December) |
403.25 | 329.30 | 37.23 | 30.13 | ||||||||||||||
2016: First quarter (to 16 February) |
376.10 | 310.25 | 32.37 | 27.64 | ||||||||||||||
Month of |
||||||||||||||||||
September 2015 |
355.85 | 322.90 | 32.41 | 29.38 | ||||||||||||||
October 2015 |
391.70 | 342.25 | 35.96 | 30.96 | ||||||||||||||
November 2015 |
403.25 | 364.50 | 37.23 | 33.38 | ||||||||||||||
December 2015 |
384.55 | 329.30 | 34.77 | 30.13 | ||||||||||||||
January 2016 |
376.10 | 323.10 | 32.37 | 28.46 | ||||||||||||||
February 2016 (to 16 February) |
366.95 | 310.25 | 31.70 | 27.64 |
a | One ADS is equivalent to six 25 cent ordinary shares. |
Source: | Thomson Reuters Datastream. |
Market prices for the ordinary shares on the LSE and in after-hours trading off the LSE, in each case while the NYSE is open, and the market prices for ADSs on the NYSE, are closely related due to arbitrage among the various markets, although differences may exist from time to time.
On 16 February 2016, 893,653,858.5 ADSs (equivalent to approximately 5,361,923,151 ordinary shares or some 29.01% of the total issued share capital, excluding shares held in treasury) were outstanding and were held by approximately 92,375 ADS holders. Of these, about 91,266 had registered addresses in the US at that date. One of the registered holders of ADSs represents some 999,817 underlying holders.
On 16 February 2016, there were approximately 262,938 ordinary shareholders. Of these shareholders, around 1,577 had registered addresses in the US and held a total of some 4,108,986 ordinary shares.
Since a number of the ordinary shares and ADSs were held by brokers and other nominees, the number of holders in the US may not be representative of the number of beneficial holders of their respective country of residence.
BPs current policy is to pay interim dividends on a quarterly basis on its ordinary shares.
Its policy is also to announce dividends for ordinary shares in US dollars and state an equivalent sterling dividend. Dividends on BP ordinary shares will be paid in sterling and on BP ADSs in US dollars. The rate of exchange used to determine the sterling amount equivalent is the average of the market exchange rates in London over the four business days prior to the sterling equivalent announcement date. The directors may choose to declare dividends in any currency provided that a sterling equivalent is announced. It is not the companys intention to change its current policy of announcing dividends on ordinary shares in US dollars.
Information regarding dividends announced and paid by the company on ordinary shares and preference shares is provided in Financial statements Note 9.
A Scrip Dividend Programme (Scrip Programme) was approved by shareholders in 2010 and was renewed for a further three years at the 2015 AGM. It enables BP ordinary shareholders and ADS holders to elect to receive dividends by way of new fully paid BP ordinary shares (or ADSs in the case of ADS holders) instead of cash. The operation of the Scrip Programme is always subject to the directors decision to make the Scrip Programme offer available in respect of any particular dividend. Should the directors decide not to offer the Scrip Programme
248 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
in respect of any particular dividend, cash will be paid automatically instead.
Future dividends will be dependent on future earnings, the financial condition of the group, the Risk factors set out on page 53 and other matters that may affect the business of the group set out in Our strategy on page 13 and in Liquidity and capital resources on page 219.
The following table shows dividends announced and paid by the company per ADS for the past five years.
Dividends per ADS a | March | June | September | December | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
2011 |
UK pence | 26.02 | 25.68 | 25.90 | 26.82 | 104.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
US cents | 42 | 42 | 42 | 42 | 168 | |||||||||||||||||||
2012 |
UK pence | 30.57 | 30.90 | 30.10 | 33.53 | 125.10 | ||||||||||||||||||
US cents | 48 | 48 | 48 | 54 | 198 | |||||||||||||||||||
2013 |
UK pence | 36.01 | 35.01 | 34.58 | 34.80 | 140.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
US cents | 54 | 54 | 54 | 57 | 219 | |||||||||||||||||||
2014 |
UK pence | 34.24 | 34.84 | 35.76 | 38.26 | 143.10 | ||||||||||||||||||
US cents | 57 | 58.5 | 58.5 | 60 | 234 | |||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
UK pence | 40.00 | 39.18 | 39.29 | 39.81 | 158.28 | ||||||||||||||||||
US cents | 60 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 240 |
a | Dividends announced and paid by the company on ordinary and preference shares are provided in Financial statements Note 9. |
UK foreign exchange controls on dividends
There are currently no UK foreign exchange controls or restrictions on remittances of dividends on the ordinary shares or on the conduct of the companys operations, other than restrictions applicable to certain countries and persons subject to EU economic sanctions or those sanctions adopted by the UK government which implement resolutions of the Security Council of the United Nations.
Shareholder taxation information
This section describes the material US federal income tax and UK taxation consequences of owning ordinary shares or ADSs to a US holder who holds the ordinary shares or ADSs as capital assets for tax purposes. It does not apply, however, inter alia to members of special classes of holders some of which may be subject to other rules, including: tax-exempt entities, life insurance companies, dealers in securities, traders in securities that elect a mark-to-market method of accounting for securities holdings, investors liable for alternative minimum tax, holders that, directly or indirectly, hold 10% or more of the companys voting stock, holders that hold the shares or ADSs as part of a straddle or a hedging or conversion transaction, holders that purchase or sell the shares or ADSs as part of a wash sale for US federal income tax purposes, or holders whose functional currency is not the US dollar. In addition, if a partnership holds the shares or ADSs, the US federal income tax treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and the tax treatment of the partnership and may not be described fully below.
A US holder is any beneficial owner of ordinary shares or ADSs that is for US federal income tax purposes (i) a citizen or resident of the US, (ii) a US domestic corporation, (iii) an estate whose income is subject to US federal income taxation regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust if a US court can exercise primary supervision over the trusts administration and one or more US persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust.
This section is based on the tax laws of the United States, including the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, its legislative history, existing and proposed US Treasury regulations thereunder, published rulings and court decisions, and the taxation laws of the UK, all as currently in effect, as well as the income tax convention between the US and the UK that entered into force on 31 March 2003 (the Treaty). These laws are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. This section further assumes that each obligation in the Deposit Agreement and any related agreement will be performed in accordance with its terms.
For purposes of the Treaty and the estate and gift tax Convention (the Estate Tax Convention) and for US federal income tax and UK taxation purposes, a holder of ADRs evidencing ADSs will be treated as the
owner of the companys ordinary shares represented by those ADRs. Exchanges of ordinary shares for ADRs and ADRs for ordinary shares generally will not be subject to US federal income tax or to UK taxation other than stamp duty or stamp duty reserve tax, as described below.
Investors should consult their own tax adviser regarding the US federal, state and local, UK and other tax consequences of owning and disposing of ordinary shares and ADSs in their particular circumstances, and in particular whether they are eligible for the benefits of the Treaty in respect of their investment in the shares or ADSs.
Taxation of dividends
UK taxation
Under current UK taxation law, no withholding tax will be deducted from dividends paid by the company, including dividends paid to US holders. A shareholder that is a company resident for tax purposes in the UK or trading in the UK through a permanent establishment generally will not be taxable in the UK on a dividend it receives from the company. A shareholder who is an individual resident for tax purposes in the UK is subject to UK tax but until 5 April 2016, is entitled to a tax credit on cash dividends paid on ordinary shares or ADSs of the company equal to one-ninth of the cash dividend.
US federal income taxation
A US holder is subject to US federal income taxation on the gross amount of any dividend paid by the company out of its current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for US federal income tax purposes). Dividends paid to a non-corporate US holder that constitute qualified dividend income will be taxable to the holder at a preferential rate, provided that the holder has a holding period in the ordinary shares or ADSs of more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date and meets other holding period requirements. Dividends paid by the company with respect to the ordinary shares or ADSs will generally be qualified dividend income.
For US federal income tax purposes, a dividend must be included in income when the US holder, in the case of ordinary shares, or the Depositary, in the case of ADSs, actually or constructively receives the dividend and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to US corporations in respect of dividends received from other US corporations. US ADS holders should consult their own tax advisor regarding the US tax treatment of the dividend fee in respect of dividends. Dividends will be income from sources outside the US and generally will be passive category income or, in the case of certain US holders, general category income, each of which is treated separately for purposes of computing a US holders foreign tax credit limitation.
As noted above in UK taxation, a US holder will not be subject to UK withholding tax. Accordingly, the receipt of a dividend will not entitle the US holder to a foreign tax credit.
The amount of the dividend distribution on the ordinary shares that is paid in pounds sterling will be the US dollar value of the pounds sterling payments made, determined at the spot pounds sterling/US dollar rate on the date the dividend distribution is includible in income, regardless of whether the payment is, in fact, converted into US dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange fluctuations during the period from the date the pounds sterling dividend payment is includible in income to the date the payment is converted into US dollars will be treated as ordinary income or loss and will not be eligible for the preferential tax rate on qualified dividend income. The gain or loss generally will be income or loss from sources within the US for foreign tax credit limitation purposes.
Distributions in excess of the companys earnings and profits, as determined for US federal income tax purposes, will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of the US holders basis in the ordinary shares or ADSs and thereafter as capital gain, subject to taxation as described in Taxation of capital gains US federal income taxation section below.
In addition, the taxation of dividends may be subject to the rules for passive foreign investment companies (PFIC), described below under Taxation of capital gains US federal income taxation. Distributions made by a PFIC do not constitute qualified dividend income and are not eligible for the preferential tax rate applicable to such income.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 249 |
Taxation of capital gains
UK taxation
A US holder may be liable for both UK and US tax in respect of a gain on the disposal of ordinary shares or ADSs if the US holder is (i) resident for tax purposes in the United Kingdom at the date of disposal, (ii) if he has left the UK for a period not exceeding five complete tax years between the year of departure from and the year of return to the UK and acquired the shares before leaving the UK and was resident in the UK in the previous four out of seven tax years before the year of departure, (iii) a US domestic corporation resident in the UK by reason of its business being managed or controlled in the UK or (iv) a citizen of the US that carries on a trade or profession or vocation in the UK through a branch or agency or a corporation that carries on a trade, profession or vocation in the UK, through a permanent establishment, and that has used, held, or acquired the ordinary shares or ADSs for the purposes of such trade, profession or vocation of such branch, agency or permanent establishment. However, such persons may be entitled to a tax credit against their US federal income tax liability for the amount of UK capital gains tax or UK corporation tax on chargeable gains (as the case may be) that is paid in respect of such gain.
Under the Treaty, capital gains on dispositions of ordinary shares or ADSs generally will be subject to tax only in the jurisdiction of residence of the relevant holder as determined under both the laws of the UK and the US and as required by the terms of the Treaty.
Under the Treaty, individuals who are residents of either the UK or the US and who have been residents of the other jurisdiction (the US or the UK, as the case may be) at any time during the six years immediately preceding the relevant disposal of ordinary shares or ADSs may be subject to tax with respect to capital gains arising from a disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs of the company not only in the jurisdiction of which the holder is resident at the time of the disposition but also in the other jurisdiction.
US federal income taxation
A US holder who sells or otherwise disposes of ordinary shares or ADSs will recognize a capital gain or loss for US federal income tax purposes equal to the difference between the US dollar value of the amount realized on the disposition and the US holders tax basis, determined in US dollars, in the ordinary shares or ADSs. Any such capital gain or loss generally will be long-term gain or loss, subject to tax at a preferential rate for a non-corporate US holder, if the US holders holding period for such ordinary shares or ADSs exceeds one year.
Gain or loss from the sale or other disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs will generally be income or loss from sources within the US for foreign tax credit limitation purposes. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations.
We do not believe that ordinary shares or ADSs will be treated as stock of a passive foreign investment company, or PFIC, for US federal income tax purposes, but this conclusion is a factual determination that is made annually and thus is subject to change. If we are treated as a PFIC, unless a US holder elects to be taxed annually on a mark-to-market basis with respect to ordinary shares or ADSs, any gain realized on the sale or other disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs would in general not be treated as capital gain. Instead, a US holder would be treated as if he or she had realized such gain rateably over the holding period for ordinary shares or ADSs and would be taxed at the highest tax rate in effect for each such year to which the gain was allocated, in addition to which an interest charge in respect of the tax attributable to each such year would apply. Certain excess distributions would be similarly treated if we were treated as a PFIC.
Additional tax considerations
Scrip Programme
The company has an optional Scrip Programme, wherein holders of BP ordinary shares or ADSs may elect to receive any dividends in the form of new fully paid ordinary shares or ADSs of the company instead of cash. Please consult your tax adviser for the consequences to you.
UK inheritance tax
The Estate Tax Convention applies to inheritance tax. ADSs held by an individual who is domiciled for the purposes of the Estate Tax Convention in the US and is not for the purposes of the Estate Tax Convention a national of the UK will not be subject to UK inheritance tax on the individuals death or on transfer during the individuals lifetime unless, among other things, the ADSs are part of the business property of a permanent establishment situated in the UK used for the performance of independent personal services. In the exceptional case where ADSs are subject to both inheritance tax and US federal gift or estate tax, the Estate Tax Convention generally provides for tax payable in the US to be credited against tax payable in the UK or for tax paid in the UK to be credited against tax payable in the US, based on priority rules set forth in the Estate Tax Convention.
UK stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax
The statements below relate to what is understood to be the current practice of HM Revenue & Customs in the UK under existing law.
Provided that any instrument of transfer is not executed in the UK and remains at all times outside the UK and the transfer does not relate to any matter or thing done or to be done in the UK, no UK stamp duty is payable on the acquisition or transfer of ADSs. Neither will an agreement to transfer ADSs in the form of ADRs give rise to a liability to stamp duty reserve tax.
Purchases of ordinary shares, as opposed to ADSs, through the CREST system of paperless share transfers will be subject to stamp duty reserve tax at 0.5%. The charge will arise as soon as there is an agreement for the transfer of the shares (or, in the case of a conditional agreement, when the condition is fulfilled). The stamp duty reserve tax will apply to agreements to transfer ordinary shares even if the agreement is made outside the UK between two non-residents. Purchases of ordinary shares outside the CREST system are subject either to stamp duty at a rate of £5 per £1,000 (or part, unless the stamp duty is less than £5, when no stamp duty is charged), or stamp duty reserve tax at 0.5%. Stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax are generally the liability of the purchaser.
A subsequent transfer of ordinary shares to the Depositarys nominee will give rise to further stamp duty at the rate of £1.50 per £100 (or part) or stamp duty reserve tax at the rate of 1.5% of the value of the ordinary shares at the time of the transfer. For ADR holders electing to receive ADSs instead of cash, after the 2012 first quarter dividend payment HM Revenue & Customs no longer seeks to impose 1.5% stamp duty reserve tax on issues of UK shares and securities to non-EU clearance services and depositary receipt systems.
US Medicare Tax
A US holder that is an individual or estate, or a trust that does not fall into a special class of trusts that is exempt from such tax, is subject to a 3.8% tax on the lesser of (1) the US holders net investment income (or undistributed net investment income in the case of an estate or trust) for the relevant taxable year and (2) the excess of the US holders modified adjusted gross income for the taxable year over a certain threshold (which in the case of individuals is between $125,000 and $250,000, depending on the individuals circumstances). A holders net investment income generally includes its dividend income and its net gains from the disposition of shares or ADSs, unless such dividend income or net gains are derived in the ordinary course of the conduct of a trade or business (other than a trade or business that consists of certain passive or trading activities). If you are a US holder that is an individual, estate or trust, you are urged to consult your tax advisors regarding the applicability of the Medicare tax to your income and gains in respect of your investment in the shares or ADSs.
250 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
The disclosure of certain major and significant shareholdings in the share capital of the company is governed by the Companies Act 2006, the UK Financial Conduct Authoritys Disclosure and Transparency Rules (DTR) and the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Register of members holding BP ordinary shares as at 31 December 2015
Range of holdings |
|
Number of ordinary
shareholders |
|
|
Percentage of total
ordinary shareholders |
|
|
Percentage of total
ordinary share capital excluding shares held in treasury |
|
|||
1-200 |
55,102 | 20.93 | 0.01 | |||||||||
201-1,000 |
91,461 | 34.73 | 0.27 | |||||||||
1,001-10,000 |
104,537 | 39.70 | 1.75 | |||||||||
10,001-100,000 |
10,801 | 4.10 | 1.19 | |||||||||
100,001-1,000,000 |
761 | 0.29 | 1.55 | |||||||||
Over 1,000,000 a |
650 | 0.25 | 95.23 | |||||||||
Totals |
263,312 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
a | Includes JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. holding 29.04% of the total ordinary issued share capital (excluding shares held in treasury) as the approved depositary for ADSs, a breakdown of which is shown in the table below. |
Register of holders of American depositary shares (ADSs) as at 31 December 2015 a
Range of holdings |
|
Number of
ADS holders |
|
|
Percentage of total
ADS holders |
|
|
Percentage of total
ADSs |
|
|||
1-200 |
54,200 | 58.44 | 0.34 | |||||||||
201-1,000 |
24,782 | 26.73 | 1.33 | |||||||||
1,001-10,000 |
13,097 | 14.12 | 3.84 | |||||||||
10,001-100,000 |
662 | 0.71 | 1.23 | |||||||||
100,001-1,000,000 |
9 | 0.00 | 0.16 | |||||||||
Over 1,000,000 b |
1 | 0.00 | 93.10 | |||||||||
Totals |
92,751 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
a | One ADS represents six 25 cent ordinary shares. |
b | One holder of ADSs represents 991,246 underlying shareholders, as at 11 January 2016. |
As at 31 December 2015, there were also 1,436 preference shareholders. Preference shareholders represented 0.46% and ordinary shareholders represented 99.54% of the total issued nominal share capital of the company (excluding shares held in treasury) as at that date.
In accordance with DTR 5, we have received notification that as at 31 December 2015 BlackRock, Inc held 6.42% and Legal & General Group plc held 3.23% of the voting rights of the issued share capital of the company. As at 16 February 2016 BlackRock, Inc. held 6.86% and Legal & General Group plc held 3.21% of the voting rights of the issued share capital of the company.
Under the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 BP has received notification of the following interests as at 16 February 2016:
Holder |
|
Holding of
ordinary shares |
|
|
Percentage
of ordinary share capital excluding shares held in treasury |
|
||
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., depositary for ADSs, through its nominee Guaranty Nominees Limited |
5,361,923,151 | 29.01 | ||||||
BlackRock, Inc. |
1,269,247,291 | 6.86 |
The companys major shareholders do not have different voting rights.
The company has also been notified of the following interests in preference shares as at 16 February 2016:
Holder |
|
Holding of 8%
cumulative first preference shares |
|
|
Percentage
of class |
|
||
The National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society |
945,000 | 13.07 | ||||||
M & G Investment Management Ltd. |
528,150 | 7.30 |
Holder |
|
Holding of 9%
cumulative second preference shares |
|
|
Percentage
of class |
|
||
The National Farmers Union Mutual Insurance Society |
987,000 | 18.03 | ||||||
M & G Investment Management Ltd. |
644,450 | 11.77 | ||||||
Bank Julius Baer |
294,000 | 5.37 | ||||||
Smith & Williamson Investment Management Ltd. |
279,500 | 5.11 |
In accordance with DTR 5.8.12, Smith and Williamson Holdings Limited disposed of its interest in 32,500 8% cumulative first preference shares during 2014.
In accordance with DTR 5.6, BlackRock, Inc. notified the company that its indirect interest in ordinary shares decreased below 5% during 2014.
UBS Investment Bank notified the company that its indirect interest in ordinary shares increased above 3% on 9 February 2015 and that it decreased below the notifiable threshold on 16 February 2015.
UBS Investment Bank notified the company that its indirect interest in ordinary shares increased above 3% on 7 May 2015 and that it decreased below the notifiable threshold on 11 May 2015.
The Capital Group of Companies, Inc. notified the company that its indirect interest in ordinary shares decreased below the notifiable threshold on 21 July 2015.
UBS Investment Bank notified the company that its indirect interest in ordinary shares increased above 3% on 4 November 2015 and that it decreased below the notifiable threshold on 9 November 2015.
BlackRock, Inc. notified the company that its indirect interest in ordinary shares remained above the previously disclosed threshold of 5%, on 26 November 2015, that it decreased below 5% on 4 February 2016 and that it increased above 5% on 15 February 2016.
As at 16 February 2016, the total preference shares in issue comprised only 0.46% of the companys total issued nominal share capital (excluding shares held in treasury), the rest being ordinary shares.
The 2016 AGM will be held on Thursday 14 April 2016 at 11.30am at ExCeL London, One Western Gateway, Royal Victoria Dock, London, E16 1XL. A separate notice convening the meeting is distributed to shareholders, which includes an explanation of the items of business to be considered at the meeting.
All resolutions for which notice has been given will be decided on a poll. Ernst & Young LLP have expressed their willingness to continue in office as auditors and a resolution for their reappointment is included in the Notice of BP Annual General Meeting 2016 .
Memorandum and Articles of Association
The following summarizes certain provisions of the companys Memorandum and Articles of Association and applicable English law. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the UK Companies Act 2006 (the Act) and the companys Memorandum and Articles of Association. For information on where investors can obtain copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association see Documents on display on page 254.
The companys Articles of Association may be amended by a special resolution at a general meeting of the shareholders. At the annual general meeting (AGM) held on 17 April 2008 shareholders voted to adopt new Articles of Association, largely to take account of changes in UK company law brought about by the Act. Further amendments to the Articles of Association were approved by shareholders at the AGM held on 15 April 2010. At the AGM held on 16 April 2015 shareholders voted to adopt new Articles of Association to reflect developments in practice and to provide clarification and additional flexibility.
Objects and purposes
BP is incorporated under the name BP p.l.c. and is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 102498. The provisions regulating the operations of the company, known as its objects, were historically
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 251 |
stated in a companys memorandum. The Act abolished the need to have object provisions and so at the AGM held on 15 April 2010 shareholders approved the removal of its objects clause together with all other provisions of its Memorandum that, by virtue of the Act, are treated as forming part of the companys Articles of Association.
Directors
The business and affairs of BP shall be managed by the directors. The companys Articles of Association provide that directors may be appointed by the existing directors or by the shareholders in a general meeting. Any person appointed by the directors will hold office only until the next general meeting, notice of which is first given after their appointment and will then be eligible for re-election by the shareholders. A director may be removed by BP as provided for by applicable law and shall vacate office in certain circumstances as set out in the Articles of Association. In addition, the company may by special resolution remove a director before the expiration of his/her period of office and, subject to the Articles of Association, may by ordinary resolution appoint another person to be a director instead. There is no requirement for a director to retire on reaching any age.
The Articles of Association place a general prohibition on a director voting in respect of any contract or arrangement in which the director has a material interest other than by virtue of such directors interest in shares in the company. However, in the absence of some other material interest not indicated below, a director is entitled to vote and to be counted in a quorum for the purpose of any vote relating to a resolution concerning the following matters:
| The giving of security or indemnity with respect to any money lent or obligation taken by the director at the request or benefit of the company or any of its subsidiaries. |
| Any proposal in which the director is interested, concerning the underwriting of company securities or debentures or the giving of any security to a third party for a debt or obligation of the company or any of its subsidiaries. |
| Any proposal concerning any other company in which the director is interested, directly or indirectly (whether as an officer or shareholder or otherwise) provided that the director and persons connected with such director are not the holder or holders of 1% or more of the voting interest in the shares of such company. |
| Any proposal concerning the purchase or maintenance of any insurance policy under which the director may benefit. |
| Any proposal concerning the giving to the director of any other indemnity which is on substantially the same terms as indemnities given or to be given to all of the other directors or to the funding by the company of his expenditure on defending proceedings or the doing by the company of anything to enable the director to avoid incurring such expenditure where all other directors have been given or are to be given substantially the same arrangements. |
| Any proposal concerning an arrangement for the benefit of the employees and directors or former employees and former directors of the company or any of its subsidiary undertakings, including but without being limited to a retirement benefits scheme and an employees share scheme, which does not accord to any director any privilege or advantage not generally accorded to the employees or former employees to whom the arrangement relates. |
The Act requires a director of a company who is in any way interested in a contract or proposed contract with the company to declare the nature of the directors interest at a meeting of the directors of the company. The definition of interest includes the interests of spouses, children, companies and trusts. The Act also requires that a director must avoid a situation where a director has, or could have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict, with the companys interests. The Act allows directors of public companies to authorize such conflicts where appropriate, if a companys Articles of Association so permit. BPs Articles of Association permit the authorization of such conflicts. The directors may exercise all the powers of the company to borrow money, except that the amount remaining undischarged of all moneys borrowed by the company shall not, without approval of the shareholders, exceed two times the amount paid up on the share capital plus the aggregate of the amount of the capital and revenue reserves of the company. Variation of the borrowing power of the board may only be affected by amending the Articles of Association.
Remuneration of non-executive directors shall be determined in the aggregate by resolution of the shareholders. Remuneration of executive directors is determined by the remuneration committee. This committee is made up of non-executive directors only. There is no requirement of share ownership for a directors qualification.
Dividend rights; other rights to share in company profits; capital calls
If recommended by the directors of BP, BP shareholders may, by resolution, declare dividends but no such dividend may be declared in excess of the amount recommended by the directors. The directors may also pay interim dividends without obtaining shareholder approval. No dividend may be paid other than out of profits available for distribution, as determined under IFRS and the Act. Dividends on ordinary shares are payable only after payment of dividends on BP preference shares. Any dividend unclaimed after a period of 12 years from the date of declaration of such dividend shall be forfeited and reverts to BP. If the company exercises its right to forfeit shares and sells shares belonging to an untraced shareholder then any dividends or other monies unclaimed in respect of those shares will be forfeited after a period of two years.
The directors have the power to declare and pay dividends in any currency provided that a sterling equivalent is announced. It is not the companys intention to change its current policy of paying dividends in US dollars. At the companys AGM held on 15 April 2010, shareholders approved the introduction of a Scrip Dividend Programme (Scrip Programme) and to include provisions in the Articles of Association to enable the company to operate the Scrip Programme. The Scrip Programme was renewed at the companys AGM held on 16 April 2015 for a further three years. The Scrip Programme enables ordinary shareholders and BP ADS holders to elect to receive new fully paid ordinary shares (or BP ADSs in the case of BP ADS holders) instead of cash. The operation of the Scrip Programme is always subject to the directors decision to make the scrip offer available in respect of any particular dividend. Should the directors decide not to offer the scrip in respect of any particular dividend, cash will automatically be paid instead.
Apart from shareholders rights to share in BPs profits by dividend (if any is declared or announced), the Articles of Association provide that the directors may set aside:
| A special reserve fund out of the balance of profits each year to make up any deficit of cumulative dividend on the BP preference shares. |
| A general reserve out of the balance of profits each year, which shall be applicable for any purpose to which the profits of the company may properly be applied. This may include capitalization of such sum, pursuant to an ordinary shareholders resolution, and distribution to shareholders as if it were distributed by way of a dividend on the ordinary shares or in paying up in full unissued ordinary shares for allotment and distribution as bonus shares. |
Any such sums so deposited may be distributed in accordance with the manner of distribution of dividends as described above.
Holders of shares are not subject to calls on capital by the company, provided that the amounts required to be paid on issue have been paid off. All shares are fully paid.
Voting rights
The Articles of Association of the company provide that voting on resolutions at a shareholders meeting will be decided on a poll other than resolutions of a procedural nature, which may be decided on a show of hands. If voting is on a poll, every shareholder who is present in person or by proxy has one vote for every ordinary share held and two votes for every £5 in nominal amount of BP preference shares held. If voting is on a show of hands, each shareholder who is present at the meeting in person or whose duly appointed proxy is present in person will have one vote, regardless of the number of shares held, unless a poll is requested.
Shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights.
For the purposes of determining which persons are entitled to attend or vote at a shareholders meeting and how many votes such persons may cast, the company may specify in the notice of the meeting a time, not more than 48 hours before the time of the meeting, by which a person who holds shares in registered form must be entered on the companys register of members in order to have the right to attend or vote at the meeting or to appoint a proxy to do so.
252 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
Holders on record of ordinary shares may appoint a proxy, including a beneficial owner of those shares, to attend, speak and vote on their behalf at any shareholders meeting, provided that a duly completed proxy form is received not less than 48 hours (or such shorter time as the directors may determine) before the time of the meeting or adjourned meeting or, where the poll is to be taken after the date of the meeting, not less than 24 hours (or such shorter time as the directors may determine) before the time of the poll.
Record holders of BP ADSs are also entitled to attend, speak and vote at any shareholders meeting of BP by the appointment by the approved depositary, JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., of them as proxies in respect of the ordinary shares represented by their ADSs. Each such proxy may also appoint a proxy. Alternatively, holders of BP ADSs are entitled to vote by supplying their voting instructions to the depositary, who will vote the ordinary shares represented by their ADSs in accordance with their instructions.
Proxies may be delivered electronically.
Corporations who are members of the company may appoint one or more persons to act as their representative or representatives at any shareholders meeting provided that the company may require a corporate representative to produce a certified copy of the resolution appointing them before they are permitted to exercise their powers.
Matters are transacted at shareholders meetings by the proposing and passing of resolutions, of which there are two types: ordinary or special.
An ordinary resolution requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes of those persons voting at a meeting at which there is a quorum. A special resolution requires the affirmative vote of not less than three quarters of the persons voting at a meeting at which there is a quorum. Any AGM requires 21 clear days notice. The notice period for any other general meeting is 14 clear days subject to the company obtaining annual shareholder approval, failing which, a 21 clear day notice period will apply.
Liquidation rights; redemption provisions
In the event of a liquidation of BP, after payment of all liabilities and applicable deductions under UK laws and subject to the payment of secured creditors, the holders of BP preference shares would be entitled to the sum of (1) the capital paid up on such shares plus, (2) accrued and unpaid dividends and (3) a premium equal to the higher of (a) 10% of the capital paid up on the BP preference shares and (b) the excess of the average market price over par value of such shares on the LSE during the previous six months. The remaining assets (if any) would be divided pro rata among the holders of ordinary shares.
Without prejudice to any special rights previously conferred on the holders of any class of shares, BP may issue any share with such preferred, deferred or other special rights, or subject to such restrictions as the shareholders by resolution determine (or, in the absence of any such resolutions, by determination of the directors), and may issue shares that are to be or may be redeemed.
Variation of rights
The rights attached to any class of shares may be varied with the consent in writing of holders of 75% of the shares of that class or on the adoption of a special resolution passed at a separate meeting of the holders of the shares of that class. At every such separate meeting, all of the provisions of the Articles of Association relating to proceedings at a general meeting apply, except that the quorum with respect to a meeting to change the rights attached to the preference shares is 10% or more of the shares of that class, and the quorum to change the rights attached to the ordinary shares is one third or more of the shares of that class.
Shareholders meetings and notices
Shareholders must provide BP with a postal or electronic address in the UK to be entitled to receive notice of shareholders meetings. Holders of BP ADSs are entitled to receive notices under the terms of the deposit agreement relating to BP ADSs. The substance and timing of notices are described on page 252 under the heading Voting rights.
Under the Act, the AGM of shareholders must be held once every year, within each six month period beginning with the day following the
companys accounting reference date. All general meetings shall be held at a time and place (in England) determined by the directors. If any shareholders meeting is adjourned for lack of quorum, notice of the time and place of the adjourned meeting may be given in any lawful manner, including electronically. Powers exist for action to be taken either before or at the meeting by authorized officers to ensure its orderly conduct and safety of those attending.
Limitations on voting and shareholding
There are no limitations, either under the laws of the UK or under the companys Articles of Association, restricting the right of non-resident or foreign owners to hold or vote BP ordinary or preference shares in the company other than limitations that would generally apply to all of the shareholders and limitations applicable to certain countries and persons subject to EU economic sanctions or those sanctions adopted by the UK government which implement resolutions of the Security Council of the United Nations.
Disclosure of interests in shares
The Act permits a public company to give notice to any person whom the company believes to be or, at any time during the three years prior to the issue of the notice, to have been interested in its voting shares requiring them to disclose certain information with respect to those interests. Failure to supply the information required may lead to disenfranchisement of the relevant shares and a prohibition on their transfer and receipt of dividends and other payments in respect of those shares and any new shares in the company issued in respect of those shares. In this context the term interest is widely defined and will generally include an interest of any kind whatsoever in voting shares, including any interest of a holder of BP ADSs.
Called-up share capital
Details of the allotted, called-up and fully-paid share capital at 31 December 2015 are set out in Financial statements Note 30. At the AGM on 16 April 2015, authorization was given to the directors to allot shares up to an aggregate nominal amount equal to $3,040 million. Authority was also given to the directors to allot shares for cash and to dispose of treasury shares, other than by way of rights issue, up to a maximum of $228 million, without having to offer such shares to existing shareholders. These authorities were given for the period until the next AGM in 2016 or 16 July 2016, whichever is the earlier. These authorities are renewed annually at the AGM.
Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers
At the AGM on 16 April 2015, authorization was given to the company to repurchase up to 1.8 billion ordinary shares for the period until the next AGM in 2016 or 16 July 2016, being the latest dates by which an AGM must be held for that year. This authorization is renewed annually at the AGM. No ordinary shares were repurchased during 2015. The following table provides details of ordinary share purchases made by the Employee Share Ownership Plans (ESOPs) and other purchases of ordinary shares and ADSs made to satisfy the requirements of certain employee share-based payment plans.
|
Number of shares
purchased by ESOPs or for certain employee share-based plans a |
|
|
Average price
paid per share $ |
|
|||||
2015 |
||||||||||
January 5 January 30 |
36,600,000 | 6.19 | ||||||||
February 2 to February 5 |
6,960,000 | 6.50 | ||||||||
September 21 |
1,132,000 | 5.22 | ||||||||
October 29 |
2,800,000 | 5.99 | ||||||||
November 3 November 4 |
2,700,000 | 5.94 | ||||||||
December 15 |
950,000 | 5.16 | ||||||||
2016 |
||||||||||
January 1 January 31 |
Nil | |||||||||
February 1 to February 16 |
Nil |
a | All share purchases were of ordinary shares of 25 cents each and/or ADSs (each representing six ordinary shares) and were on/open market transactions. |
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 253 |
Fees and charges payable by ADSs holders
The Depositary collects fees for delivery and surrender of ADSs directly from investors depositing shares or surrendering ADSs for the purpose of withdrawal or from intermediaries acting for them. The Depositary collects fees for making distributions to investors by deducting those fees from the amounts distributed or by selling a portion of the distributable property to pay the fees.
The charges of the Depositary payable by investors are as follows:
Type of service | Depositary actions | Fee | ||||||
Depositing or substituting the underlying shares |
Issuance of ADSs against the deposit of shares, including deposits and issuances in respect of: Share distributions, stock splits, rights, merger. Exchange of securities or other transactions or event or other distribution affecting the ADSs or deposited securities. |
$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof) evidenced by the new ADSs delivered. | ||||||
Selling or exercising rights | Distribution or sale of securities, the fee being an amount equal to the fee for the execution and delivery of ADSs that would have been charged as a result of the deposit of such securities. | $5.00 per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof). | ||||||
Withdrawing an underlying share | Acceptance of ADSs surrendered for withdrawal of deposited securities. | $5.00 for each 100 ADSs (or portion thereof) evidenced by the ADSs surrendered. | ||||||
Expenses of the Depositary |
Expenses incurred on behalf of holders in connection with: Stock transfer or other taxes and governmental charges. Delivery by cable, telex, electronic and facsimile transmission. Transfer or registration fees, if applicable, for the registration of transfers of underlying shares. Expenses of the Depositary in connection with the conversion of foreign currency into US dollars (which are paid out of such foreign currency). |
Expenses payable are subject to agreement between the company and the Depositary by billing holders or by deducting charges from one or more cash dividends or other cash distributions. | ||||||
Dividend fees | ADS holders who receive a cash dividend are charged a fee which BP uses to offset the costs associated with administering the ADS programme. | US$0.005 per BP ADS per quarter per cash distribution. |
Fees and payments made by the Depositary to the issuer
The Depositary has agreed to reimburse certain company expenses related to the companys ADS programme and incurred by the company in connection with the ADS programme arising during the year ended 31 December 2015. The Depositary reimbursed to the company, or paid amounts on the companys behalf to third parties, or waived its fees and expenses, of $11,858,206.46 for the year ended 31 December 2015.
The table below sets out the types of expenses that the Depositary has agreed to reimburse and the fees it has agreed to waive for standard costs associated with the administration of the ADS programme relating to the year ended 31 December 2015. The Depositary has also paid certain expenses directly to third parties on behalf of the company.
Category of expense reimbursed,
waived or paid directly to third parties |
|
Amount reimbursed, waived or paid
directly to third parties for the year ended 31 December 2015 $ |
|
|
Service fees and out of pocket expenses waived a |
37,650 | |||
Other third-party mailing costs reimbursed b |
54,014.67 | |||
Dividend fees c |
11,766,541.79 | |||
Total |
11,858,206.46 |
a | Includes fees in relation to transfer agent costs and costs of the BP Scrip Dividend Programme operated by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
b | Payment of fees to Precision IR for investor support. |
c | Dividend fees are charged to ADS holders who receive a cash distribution, which BP uses to offset the costs associated with administering the ADS programme. |
Under certain circumstances, including removal of the Depositary or termination of the ADR programme by the company, the company is required to repay the Depositary certain amounts reimbursed and/or expenses paid to or on behalf of the company during the 12-month period prior to notice of removal or termination.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 and BP Strategic Report 2015 are available online at bp.com/annualreport . To obtain a hard copy of BPs complete audited financial statements, free of charge, UK based shareholders should contact BP Distribution Services by calling +44 (0)870 241 3269 or by emailing bpdistributionservices@bp.com. If based in the US or Canada shareholders should contact Issuer Direct by calling +1 888 301 2505 or by emailing bpreports@precisionir.com .
The company is subject to the information requirements of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934 applicable to foreign private issuers. In accordance with these requirements, the company files its Annual Report and Form 20-F and other related documents with the SEC. It is possible to read and copy documents that have been filed with the SEC at its headquarters located at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549, US. You may also call the SEC at +1 800-SEC-0330. In addition, BPs SEC filings are available to the public at the SECs website. BP discloses in this report (see Corporate governance practices (Form 20-F Item 16G) on page 244) significant ways (if any) in which its corporate governance practices differ from those mandated for US companies under NYSE listing standards.
254 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
If you have any queries about the administration of shareholdings, such as change of address, change of ownership, dividend payments, the Scrip Programme or to change the way you receive your company documents (such as the BP Annual Report and Form 20-F , BP Strategic Report and Notice of BP Annual General Meeting ) please contact the BP Registrar or the BP ADS Depositary.
Ordinary and preference shareholders
The BP Registrar Capita Asset Services
The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road
Beckenham, Kent BR3 4TU, UK
Freephone in UK 0800 701107
From outside the UK +44 (0)20 3170 3678
Fax +44 (0)1484 601512
ADS holders
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. PO Box 64504
St Paul, MN 55164-0504, US
Toll-free in US and Canada +1 877 638 5672
From outside the US and Canada +1 651 306 4383
The following documents are filed in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) EDGAR system, as part of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, and can be viewed on the SECs website.
Exhibit 1 | Memorandum and Articles of Association of BP p.l.c. | |
Exhibit 4.1 | The BP Executive Directors Incentive Plan*** | |
Exhibit 4.2 | Amended BP Deferred Annual Bonus Plan 2005** | |
Exhibit 4.3 |
Amended Directors Secondment Agreement for
R W Dudley****** |
|
Exhibit 4.4 | Amended Directors Service Contract and Secondment Agreement for R W Dudley* | |
Exhibit 4.7 | Directors Service Contract for Dr B Gilvary**** | |
Exhibit 4.10 | The BP Share Award Plan 2015 | |
Exhibit 7 | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (Unaudited) | |
Exhibit 8 | Subsidiaries (included as Note 36 to the Financial Statements) | |
Exhibit 11 | Code of Ethics***** | |
Exhibit 12 | Rule 13a 14(a) Certifications | |
Exhibit 13 | Rule 13a 14(b) Certifications# | |
Exhibit 15.1 | Consent of DeGolyer and MacNaughton | |
Exhibit 15.2 | Report of DeGolyer and MacNaughton | |
Exhibit 15.3 | Administrative Agreement dated as of 13 March 2014 among the US Environmental Protection Agency, BP p.l.c., and other BP subsidiaries*** | |
Exhibit 15.4 | Proposed Consent Decree | |
Exhibit 15.5 | Gulf states Settlement Agreement |
* | Incorporated by reference to the companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2010. |
** | Incorporated by reference to the companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2012. |
*** | Incorporated by reference to the companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2014. |
**** | Incorporated by reference to the companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2011. |
***** | Incorporated by reference to the companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2009. |
****** | Incorporated by reference to the companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended 31 December 2013. |
# | Furnished only. |
| Included only in the annual report filed in the Securities and Exchange Commission EDGAR system. |
The total amount of long-term securities of the Registrant and its subsidiaries authorized under any one instrument does not exceed 10% of the total assets of BP p.l.c. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
The company agrees to furnish copies of any or all such instruments to the SEC on request.
Abbreviations, glossary and trade marks
ADR
American depositary receipt.
ADS
American depositary share. 1 ADS = 6 ordinary shares.
Barrel (bbl)
159 litres, 42 US gallons.
bcf/d
Billion cubic feet per day.
bcfe
Billion cubic feet equivalent.
bcma
Billion cubic metres per annum.
b/d
Barrels per day.
boe/d
Barrels of oil equivalent per day.
DoJ
US Department of Justice.
GAAP
Generally accepted accounting practice.
Gas
Natural gas.
GHG
Greenhouse gas.
GWh
Gigawatt hour.
HSSE
Health, safety, security and environment.
IFRS
International Financial Reporting Standards.
KPIs
Key performance indicators.
LNG
Liquefied natural gas.
LPG
Liquefied petroleum gas.
mb/d
Thousand barrels per day.
mboe/d
Thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day.
mmb/d
Million barrels per day.
mmboe/d
Million barrels of oil equivalent per day.
mmBtu
Million British thermal units.
mmcf/d
Million cubic feet per day.
mmte
Million tonnes.
MW
Megawatt.
NGLs
Natural gas liquids.
PSA
Production-sharing agreement.
PTA
Purified terephthalic acid.
RC
Replacement cost.
SEC
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 255 |
Glossary
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the definitions for the following glossary terms are given below.
Associate
An entity over which the group has significant influence and that is neither a subsidiary nor a joint arrangement of the group. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee but is not control or joint control over those policies.
Brent
A trading classification for North Sea crude oil that serves as a major benchmark price for purchases of oil worldwide.
Cash costs
Non-GAAP measure. Cash costs are a subset of production and manufacturing expenses plus distribution and administration expenses and excludes costs that are classified as non-operating items. They represent the substantial majority of the remaining expenses in these line items but exclude certain costs that are variable, primarily with volumes (such as freight costs). Management believes that the presentation of cash costs is a performance measure that provides investors with useful information regarding the companys financial condition because it considers these expenses to be the principal operating and overhead expenses that are most directly under their control although they also include certain foreign exchange and commodity price effects.
Consolidation adjustment UPII
Unrealized profit in inventory arising on inter-segment transactions.
Commodity trading contracts
BPs Upstream and Downstream segments both participate in regional and global commodity trading markets in order to manage, transact and hedge the crude oil, refined products and natural gas that the group either produces or consumes in its manufacturing operations. These physical trading activities, together with associated incremental trading opportunities, are discussed in Upstream on page 28 and in Downstream on page 34. The range of contracts the group enters into in its commodity trading operations is described below. Using these contracts, in combination with rights to access storage and transportation capacity, allows the group to access advantageous pricing differences between locations, time periods and arbitrage between markets.
Exchange-traded commodity derivatives
Contracts that are typically in the form of futures and options traded on a recognized exchange, such as Nymex and ICE. Such contracts are traded in standard specifications for the main marker crude oils, such as Brent and West Texas Intermediate; the main product grades, such as gasoline and gasoil; and for natural gas and power. Gains and losses, otherwise referred to as variation margin, are generally settled on a daily basis with the relevant exchange. These contracts are used for the trading and risk management of crude oil, refined products, and natural gas and power. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on exchange-traded commodity derivatives are included in sales and other operating revenues for accounting purposes.
Over-the-counter contracts
Contracts that are typically in the form of forwards, swaps and options. Some of these contracts are traded bilaterally between counterparties or through brokers, others may be cleared by a central clearing counterparty. These contracts can be used both for trading and risk management activities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on over-the-counter (OTC) contracts are included in sales and other operating revenues for accounting purposes. Many grades of crude oil bought and sold use standard contracts including US domestic light sweet crude oil, commonly referred to as West Texas Intermediate, and a standard North Sea crude blend Brent, Forties, Oseberg and Ekofisk (BFOE). Forward contracts are used in connection with the purchase of crude oil supplies for refineries, products for marketing and sales of the groups oil production and refined products. The contracts typically contain standard delivery and settlement terms. These transactions call for physical delivery of oil with consequent operational and price risk. However, various means exist and are used from time to time, to settle obligations under the contracts in cash rather than through physical delivery.
Because the physically settled transactions are delivered by cargo, the BFOE contract additionally specifies a standard volume and tolerance.
Gas and power OTC markets are highly developed in North America and the UK, where commodities can be bought and sold for delivery in future periods. These contracts are negotiated between two parties to purchase and sell gas and power at a specified price, with delivery and settlement at a future date. Typically, the contracts specify delivery terms for the underlying commodity. Some of these transactions are not settled physically as they can be achieved by transacting offsetting sale or purchase contracts for the same location and delivery period that are offset during the scheduling of delivery or dispatch. The contracts contain standard terms such as delivery point, pricing mechanism, settlement terms and specification of the commodity. Typically, volume, price and term (e.g. daily, monthly and balance of month) are the main variable contract terms.
Swaps are often contractual obligations to exchange cash flows between two parties. A typical swap transaction usually references a floating price and a fixed price with the net difference of the cash flows being settled. Options give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to buy or sell crude, oil products, natural gas or power at a specified price on or before a specific future date. Amounts under these derivative financial instruments are settled at expiry. Typically, netting agreements are used to limit credit exposure and support liquidity.
Spot and term contracts
Spot contracts are contracts to purchase or sell a commodity at the market price prevailing on or around the delivery date when title to the inventory is taken. Term contracts are contracts to purchase or sell a commodity at regular intervals over an agreed term. Though spot and term contracts may have a standard form, there is no offsetting mechanism in place. These transactions result in physical delivery with operational and price risk. Spot and term contracts typically relate to purchases of crude for a refinery, products for marketing, or third-party natural gas, or sales of the groups oil production, oil products or gas production to third parties. For accounting purposes, spot and term sales are included in sales and other operating revenues when title passes. Similarly, spot and term purchases are included in purchases for accounting purposes.
Dividend yield
Sum of the four quarterly dividends announced in respect of the year as a percentage of the year-end share price on the respective exchange. The ordinary shareholders annual dividend yield includes an estimate of the sterling amount expected to be paid in respect of the dividend for the fourth quarter 2015 which was announced on 2 February 2016 in US dollars.
Fair value accounting effects
We use derivative instruments to manage the economic exposure relating to inventories above normal operating requirements of crude oil, natural gas and petroleum products. Under IFRS, these inventories are recorded at historical cost. The related derivative instruments, however, are required to be recorded at fair value with gains and losses recognized in the income statement. This is because hedge accounting is either not permitted or not followed, principally due to the impracticality of effectiveness-testing requirements. Therefore, measurement differences in relation to recognition of gains and losses occur. Gains and losses on these inventories are not recognized until the commodity is sold in a subsequent accounting period. Gains and losses on the related derivative commodity contracts are recognized in the income statement from the time the derivative commodity contract is entered into on a fair value basis using forward prices consistent with the contract maturity.
BP enters into commodity contracts to meet certain business requirements, such as the purchase of crude for a refinery or the sale of BPs gas production. Under IFRS these contracts are treated as derivatives and are required to be fair valued when they are managed as part of a larger portfolio of similar transactions. Gains and losses arising are recognized in the income statement from the time the derivative commodity contract is entered into.
IFRS require that inventory held for trading is recorded at its fair value using period-end spot prices, whereas any related derivative commodity instruments are required to be recorded at values based on forward prices consistent with the contract maturity. Depending on market conditions, these forward prices can be either higher or lower than spot
256 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
prices, resulting in measurement differences. BP enters into contracts for pipelines and storage capacity, oil and gas processing and liquefied natural gas (LNG) that, under IFRS, are recorded on an accruals basis. These contracts are risk-managed using a variety of derivative instruments that are fair valued under IFRS. This results in measurement differences in relation to recognition of gains and losses.
The way BP manages the economic exposures described above, and measures performance internally, differs from the way these activities are measured under IFRS. BP calculates this difference for consolidated entities by comparing the IFRS result with managements internal measure of performance. Under managements internal measure of performance the inventory and capacity contracts in question are valued based on fair value using relevant forward prices prevailing at the end of the period. The fair values of certain derivative instruments used to risk manage LNG and oil and gas processing contracts are deferred to match with the underlying exposure and the commodity contracts for business requirements are accounted for on an accruals basis. We believe that disclosing managements estimate of this difference provides useful information for investors because it enables investors to see the economic effect of these activities as a whole.
Free cash flow
Operating cash flow less net cash used in investing activities, as presented in the group cash flow statement.
Gearing
See Net debt and net debt ratio definition.
Henry Hub
A distribution hub on the natural gas pipeline system in Erath, Louisiana, that lends its name to the pricing point for natural gas futures contracts traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange and the over the counter swaps traded on Intercontinental Exchange.
Hydrocarbons
Liquids and natural gas. Natural gas is converted to oil equivalent at 5.8 billion cubic feet = 1 million barrels.
Inventory holding gains and losses
The difference between the cost of sales calculated using the replacement cost of inventory and the cost of sales calculated on the first-in first-out (FIFO) method after adjusting for any changes in provisions where the net realizable value of the inventory is lower than its cost. Under the FIFO method, which we use for IFRS reporting, the cost of inventory charged to the income statement is based on its historical cost of purchase or manufacture, rather than its replacement cost. In volatile energy markets, this can have a significant distorting effect on reported income. The amounts disclosed represent the difference between the charge to the income statement for inventory on a FIFO basis (after adjusting for any related movements in net realizable value provisions) and the charge that would have arisen based on the replacement cost of inventory. For this purpose, the replacement cost of inventory is calculated using data from each operations production and manufacturing system, either on a monthly basis, or separately for each transaction where the system allows this approach. The amounts disclosed are not separately reflected in the financial statements as a gain or loss. No adjustment is made in respect of the cost of inventories held as part of a trading position and certain other temporary inventory positions. See Replacement cost (RC) profit or loss definition below.
Joint arrangement
An arrangement in which two or more parties have joint control.
Joint control
Contractually agreed sharing of control over an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.
Joint operation
A joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the assets, and obligations for the liabilities, relating to the arrangement.
Joint venture
A joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement.
Liquids
Comprises crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids. For the Upstream segment, it also includes bitumen.
LNG train
An LNG train is a processing facility used to liquefy and purify natural gas in the formation of LNG.
Major projects
Have a BP net investment of at least $250 million, or are considered to be of strategic importance to BP or of a high degree of complexity.
Net cash margin
Net cash margin is defined by Solomon Associates as the net margin achieved after subtracting cash operating expenses and adding any refinery revenue from other sources. Net cash margin is expressed in US dollars per barrel of net refinery input.
Net debt and net debt ratio (gearing)
Non-GAAP measures. Net debt is calculated as gross finance debt, as shown in the balance sheet, plus the fair value of associated derivative financial instruments that are used to hedge foreign currency exchange and interest rate risks relating to finance debt, for which hedge accounting is applied, less cash and cash equivalents. The net debt ratio is defined as the ratio of net debt to the total of net debt plus total equity. All components of equity are included in the denominator of the calculation. BP believes these measures provide useful information to investors. Net debt enables investors to see the economic effect of gross debt, related hedges and cash and cash equivalents in total. The net debt ratio enables investors to see how significant net debt is relative to equity from shareholders. The derivatives are reported on the balance sheet within the headings Derivative financial instruments. See Financial statements Note 26 for information on gross debt, which is the nearest equivalent measure to net debt on an IFRS basis.
Net income per barrel
Non-GAAP measure. Net income per barrel is calculated by taking underlying replacement cost profit before interest and tax for the Downstream segment, deducting tax at an assumed 30% effective tax rate on underlying replacement cost profit and then dividing this notional post tax underlying replacement cost profit by the Downstream segments total refining capacity.
Net investment (organic)
Net investment (organic) is organic capital expenditure less the value of divestments announced in the year.
Net wind generation capacity
The sum of the rated capacities of the assets/turbines that have entered into commercial operation, including BPs share of equity-accounted entities. The gross data is the equivalent capacity on a gross-joint venture basis, which includes 100% of the capacity of equity-accounted entities where BP has partial ownership.
Non-operating items
Charges and credits are included in the financial statements that BP discloses separately because it considers such disclosures to be meaningful and relevant to investors. They are items that management considers not to be part of underlying business operations and are disclosed in order to enable investors better to understand and evaluate the groups reported financial performance. Non-operating items within equity-accounted earnings are reported net of incremental income tax reported by the equity-accounted entity. An analysis of non-operating items by segment and type is shown on page 217.
Operating capital employed
Non-GAAP measure. Total assets (excluding goodwill) less total liabilities, excluding finance debt and current and deferred taxation.
Operating cash flow and operating cash
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities as stated in the group cash flow statement. When used in the context of a segment rather than the group, the terms refer to the segments share thereof.
Operating management system (OMS)
BPs OMS helps us manage risks in our operating activities by setting out BPs principles for good operating practice. It brings together BP requirements on health, safety, security, the environment, social responsibility and operational reliability, as well as related issues, such as maintenance, contractor relations and organizational learning, into a common management system.
Organic capital expenditure
Excludes acquisitions, asset exchanges, and other inorganic capital expenditure. An analysis of capital expenditure by segment and region is shown in Financial statements Note 5.
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 257 |
Plant reliability
Plant reliability is calculated taking 100% less the ratio of total unplanned plant deferrals divided by installed production capacity. Unplanned plant deferrals are associated with the topside plant and where applicable the subsea equipment (excluding wells and reservoir). Unplanned plant deferrals include breakdowns and weather.
Pre-tax returns
Non-GAAP measure. Pre-tax returns is the ratio of underlying replacement cost profit before interest and tax to the average operating capital employed for the period.
Production-sharing agreement (PSA)
An arrangement through which an oil company bears the risks and costs of exploration, development and production. In return, if exploration is successful, the oil company receives entitlement to variable physical volumes of hydrocarbons, representing recovery of the costs incurred and a stipulated share of the production remaining after such cost recovery.
Proved reserves replacement ratio
The extent to which production is replaced by proved reserves additions. This ratio is expressed in oil equivalent terms and includes changes resulting from revisions to previous estimates, improved recovery, and extensions and discoveries.
Realizations
Realizations are the result of dividing revenue generated from hydrocarbon sales, excluding revenue generated from purchases made for resale and royalty volumes, by revenue generating hydrocarbon production volumes. Revenue generating hydrocarbon production reflects the BP share of production as adjusted for any production which does not generate revenue. Adjustments may include losses due to shrinkage, amounts consumed during processing, and contractual or regulatory host committed volumes such as royalties.
Refining availability
Represents Solomon Associates operational availability, which is defined as the percentage of the year that a unit is available for processing after subtracting the annualized time lost due to turnaround activity and all planned mechanical, process and regulatory downtime.
Refining marker margin (RMM)
The average of regional indicator margins weighted for BPs crude refining capacity in each region. Each regional marker margin is based on product yields and a marker crude oil deemed appropriate for the region. The regional indicator margins may not be representative of the margins achieved by BP in any period because of BPs particular refinery configurations and crude and product slate.
Replacement cost (RC) profit or loss
Reflects the replacement cost of inventories sold in the period and is arrived at by excluding inventory holding gains and losses from profit or loss. RC profit or loss is the measure of profit or loss that is required to be disclosed for each operating segment under IFRS. RC profit or loss for the group is not a recognized GAAP measure. Management believes this measure is useful to illustrate to investors the fact that crude oil and product prices can vary significantly from period to period and that the impact on our reported result under IFRS can be significant. Inventory holding gains and losses vary from period to period due to changes in prices as well as changes in underlying inventory levels. In order for investors to understand the operating performance of the group excluding the impact of price changes on the replacement of inventories, and to make comparisons of operating performance between reporting periods, BPs management believes it is helpful to disclose this measure. See Financial statements Note 5.
Subsidiary
An entity that is controlled by the BP group. Control of an investee exists when an investor is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee.
Tier 1 process safety events
Losses of primary containment from a process of greatest consequence causing harm to a member of the workforce or costly damage to equipment or exceeding defined quantities.
Tight oil and gas
Natural oil and gas reservoirs locked in hard sandstone rocks with low permeability, making the underground formation extremely tight.
UK National Balancing Point
A virtual trading location for sale, purchase and exchange of UK natural gas. It is the pricing and delivery point for the Intercontinental Exchange natural gas futures contract.
Unconventionals
Resources found in geographic accumulations over a large area, that usually present additional challenges to development such as low permeability or high viscosity. Examples include shale gas and oil, coalbed methane, gas hydrates and natural bitumen deposits. These typically require specialized extraction technology such as hydraulic fracturing or steam injection.
Underlying production
Production after adjusting for divestments and entitlement impacts in our production-sharing agreements.
Underlying RC profit or loss
RC profit or loss after adjusting for non-operating items and fair value accounting effects. Underlying RC profit or loss and fair value accounting effects are not recognized GAAP measures. See pages 217 and 218 for additional information on the non-operating items and fair value accounting effects that are used to arrive at underlying RC profit or loss in order to enable a full understanding of the events and their financial impact. BP believes that underlying RC profit or loss is a useful measure for investors because it is a measure closely tracked by management to evaluate BPs operating performance and to make financial, strategic and operating decisions and because it may help investors to understand and evaluate, in the same manner as management, the underlying trends in BPs operational performance on a comparable basis, year on year, by adjusting for the effects of these non-operating items and fair value accounting effects. The nearest equivalent measure on an IFRS basis for the group is profit or loss for the year attributable to BP shareholders. The nearest equivalent measure on an IFRS basis for segments is RC profit or loss before interest and taxation.
Trade marks
The Directors report on pages 55-75, 169-195 and 215-258 was approved by the board and signed on its behalf by David J Jackson, company secretary on 4 March 2016.
BP p.l.c.
Registered in England and Wales No. 102498
258 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.
BP p.l.c.
(Registrant)
/s/ David J Jackson
Company secretary
4 March 2016
BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 | 259 |
Page | ||||||
Item 1. |
Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisors | n/a | ||||
Item 2. |
Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable | n/a | ||||
Item 3. |
Key Information | |||||
A. |
Selected financial data |
216-218 |
||||
B. |
Capitalization and indebtedness |
n/a |
||||
C. |
Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds |
n/a |
||||
D. |
Risk factors |
53-54 |
||||
Item 4. |
Information on the Company | |||||
A. |
History and development of the company |
ii, 2-5, 12-17, 26-40, 117-123, 134-135, 219-220, 237-241 |
||||
B. |
Business overview |
2-17, 20-54, 124-127, 219-236, 246 |
||||
C. |
Organizational structure |
ii, 162 |
||||
D. |
Property, plants and equipment |
30-33, 35-37, 133, 147, 194-195, 221-232, 243 |
||||
Item 4A. |
Unresolved Staff Comments |
None |
||||
Item 5. |
Operating and Financial Review and Prospects | |||||
A. |
Operating results |
26-39, 41-42, 53-54, 107-121,124-128, 148-151, 219-220 |
||||
B. |
Liquidity and capital resources |
26-27, 112-113, 133, 146, 148-151, 219-220 |
||||
C. |
Research and development, patent and licenses |
16-17, 27, 128-129, 258 |
||||
D. |
Trend information |
10-19, 26-27, 34, 40 |
||||
E. |
Off-balance sheet arrangements |
147, 219-220 |
||||
F. |
Tabular disclosure of contractual commitments |
220 |
||||
G. |
Safe harbor |
246 |
||||
Item 6. |
Directors, Senior Management and Employees | |||||
A. |
Directors and senior management |
56-61 |
||||
B. |
Compensation |
76-92, 132,140-145,160 |
||||
C. |
Board practices |
56-59, 62-75, 76-92 |
||||
D. |
Employees |
49-50, 161 |
||||
E. |
Share ownership |
50, 76-92 |
||||
Item 7. |
Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions | |||||
A. |
Major shareholders |
251 |
||||
B. |
Related party transactions |
136-139, 243-244 |
||||
C. |
Interests of experts and counsel |
n/a |
||||
Item 8. |
Financial Information | |||||
A. |
Consolidated statements and other financial information |
6, 101-168, 219, 237-242, 248-249 |
||||
B. |
Significant changes |
None |
||||
Item 9. |
The Offer and Listing | |||||
A. |
Offer and listing details |
248 |
||||
B. |
Plan of distribution |
n/a |
||||
C. |
Markets |
248 |
||||
D. |
Selling shareholders |
n/a |
||||
E. |
Dilution |
n/a |
||||
F. |
Expenses of the issue |
n/a |
||||
Item 10. |
Additional Information | |||||
A. |
Share capital |
n/a |
||||
B. |
Memorandum and articles of association |
251-253 |
||||
C. |
Material contracts |
243 |
||||
D. |
Exchange controls |
249 |
||||
E. |
Taxation |
249-250 |
||||
F. |
Dividends and paying agents |
n/a |
||||
G. |
Statements by experts |
n/a |
||||
H. |
Documents on display |
254 |
||||
I. |
Subsidiary information |
162 |
||||
Item 11. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
148-154 |
||||
Item 12. |
Description of securities other than equity securities | |||||
A. |
Debt Securities |
n/a |
||||
B. |
Warrants and Rights |
n/a |
||||
C. |
Other Securities |
n/a |
||||
D. |
American Depositary Shares |
248-254 |
||||
Item 13. |
Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies |
None |
||||
Item 14. |
Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |
None |
||||
Item 15. |
Controls and Procedures |
51-52, 102, 244-245 |
||||
Item 16A. |
Audit Committee Financial Expert |
59, 68, 244 |
||||
Item 16B. |
Code of Ethics |
244 |
||||
Item 16C. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
245-246, 161 |
||||
Item 16D. |
Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees |
None |
||||
Item 16E. |
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers |
253 |
||||
Item 16F. |
Change in Registrants Certifying Accountant |
None |
||||
Item 16G. |
Corporate governance |
244 |
||||
Item 17. |
Financial Statements |
n/a |
||||
Item 18. |
Financial Statements |
101-195 |
||||
Item 19. |
Exhibits |
255 |
260 | BP Annual Report and Form 20-F 2015 |
BPs corporate reporting suite includes information about our financial and operating performance, sustainability performance and also on global energy trends and projections. |
||||||||||||||||
Annual Report and
Details of our financial
|
Strategic Report 2015 A summary of our financial and operating performance in print and online. Published in March. bp.com/annualreport |
BP Energy Outlook 2016 edition
Projections for world energy
|
||||||||||||||
Sustainability Report 2015
Details of our sustainability
|
Financial and Operating Information 2011-2015
Five-year financial and operating data in PDF and Excel format. Published in April.
|
Statistical Review of World Energy 2016
An objective review of key global energy trends.
|
||||||||||||||
You can
order BPs
bp.com/papercopies |
US and Canada Issuer Direct Toll-free: +1 888 301 2505 bpreports@precisionir.com
UK and rest of world BP Distribution Services Tel: +44 (0)870 241 3269 Fax: +44 (0)870 240 5753 bpdistributionservices@bp.com |
Feedback
Your feedback is important to us.
You can email the corporate reporting
or provide your feedback online at bp.com/annualreportfeedback |
You can also telephone
or write to:
Corporate reporting
1 St Jamess Square London SW1Y 4PD UK |
|||||||||||||
Acknowledgements | Paper | © BP p.l.c. 2016 | ||||
Design | SALTERBAXTER MSLGROUP | This document is printed on Oxygen paper and board. Oxygen is made using 100% | ||||
Typesetting | RR Donnelley | recycled pulp, a large percentage of which is de-inked. It is manufactured at a mill with | ||||
Printing | Pureprint Group Limited, UK, | ISO 9001 and 14001 accreditation and is FSC ® (Forest Stewardship Council) certified. | ||||
ISO 14001, FSC ® certified and | This document has been printed using vegetable inks. | |||||
CarbonNeutral ® | ||||||
Photography | Arnhel De Serra, Ben Weller, | |||||
Bob Masters, Bob Wheeler, | ||||||
Bruno Cohen, Graham Trott, | ||||||
Jon Challicom, Kate Kunz, | ||||||
Marc Morrison, Marlon Rouse, | Printed in the UK by Pureprint Group using their alco free ® and pure print ® printing technology. | |||||
Mehmet Binay, Richard
Davies, |
||||||
Rocky Kneten, Stuart Conway |
Exhibit 1
Memorandum and Articles of Association of
BP
p.l.c.
A public company limited by shares
Incorporated in England & Wales on 14 April 1909
Registered Office in England
April 2015
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Memorandum of Association
of
BP p.l.c.
1
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Memorandum of Association
WE, the several persons whose names and addresses are subscribed are desirous of being formed into a Company in pursuance of this Memorandum of Association, and we respectively agree to take the number of shares in the capital of the Company set opposite our respective names.
Number of Preference Shares | ||
Names, Addresses and Descriptions of Subscribers | taken by each Subscriber | |
Strathcona, |
||
28 Grosvenor Square, London W., | One thousand | |
G.C.M.G., G.C.V.O. | Preference | |
Charles William Wallace, |
||
Director, The Burmah Oil Company, Limited, | One thousand | |
Winchester House, Old Broad Street, | Preference | |
London E.C. | ||
Francis of Teck, |
||
36 Welbeck Street, London W. | One thousand | |
K.C.V.O. | Preference | |
H.S. Barnes, K.C.S.I., K.C.V.O. |
||
East India United Service Club, | One thousand | |
16 St. James Square, London S.W. | Preference | |
William Garson, |
||
Writer to the Signet, | One thousand | |
5 Albyn Place, Edinburgh. | Preference | |
John T. Cargill |
||
Chairman, The Burmah Oil Company, Limited, | One thousand | |
175 West George Street, Glasgow. | Preference | |
W.K. DArcy |
||
Chairman, London Board, | One thousand | |
Mount Morgan Gold Co., Limited, | Preference | |
42 Grosvenor Square, London W. |
2
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Articles of
Association
of
BP p.l.c.
3
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Articles of Association of BP p.l.c.
Preliminary
No application of statutory regulations
1 The Regulations in Table A of the Companies (Table A-F) Regulations 1985, the model articles for public companies in the Companies (Model Articles) Regulations 2008 and any similar regulations in statutes or subordinated legislation relating to companies do not apply to the Company.
Limited liability
2 The liability of the members is limited to the amount, if any, unpaid on the shares held by them.
Definitions
3 In these Articles, except where the subject or context otherwise requires:
address | in relation to electronic communications, includes any number or address used for the purposes of such communications, and includes in the case of any Uncertificated Proxy Instruction permitted pursuant to Article 78(C), an identification number of a participant in the relevant system concerned | |
Appointed Number | has the meaning given in Article 152(D)(i) | |
Appointed Person | has the meaning given in Article 152(B) | |
Approved Depositary | has the meaning given in Article 148 | |
Approved Depositary Record Date | has the meaning given in Article 158(A) | |
Approved Depositary Register | has the meaning given in Article 152(A) | |
Approved Transfer | has the meaning given in Article 83(J) | |
Articles | means these articles of association as amended from time to time | |
cash memorandum account | shall mean an account so designated by the Operator of the relevant system concerned | |
certificated share | means a share in the capital of the Company which is not an uncertificated share | |
Chairman | has the meaning given in Article 91(B) | |
Companies Acts | has the meaning given in section 2 of the Companies Act 2006, in so far as they apply to the Company | |
Default Shares | has the meaning given in Article 83(A) | |
Designated Period | has the meaning given in Article 83(J) | |
Direction Notice | has the meaning given in Article 83(A) | |
Elected Ordinary Shares | has the meaning given in Article 134(E) | |
First Preference Shares | has the meaning given in Article 6(A) | |
London Stock Exchange | means the London Stock Exchange plc | |
month | means calendar month | |
Office | means the registered office for the time being of the Company | |
Overall Holding | has the meaning given in Article 151 | |
paid | means paid or credited as paid | |
prescribed period | has the meaning given in Article 12(B)(iv)(b) for the purposes specified there | |
Principal Place | has the meaning given in Article 57(B) | |
Procedural Resolutions | means all resolutions of a procedural nature (such as a resolution to amend a Substantive Resolution as permitted by Article 64(B), a resolution on adjournment of a meeting or a resolution on choice of a Chairman) |
4
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Recognised Investment Exchange | means a recognised investment exchange within the meaning of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 or any other stock exchange outside the United Kingdom on which the Companys shares are normally traded | |
record date | has the meaning given in Article 135(A) | |
rights issue | has the meaning given in Article 12(B)(iv)(a) for the purposes specified there | |
scrip dividend programme | has the meaning given in Article 134 | |
Scrip Shares | has the meaning given in Article 134(C) | |
Seal | means the common seal of the Company | |
Second Preference Shares | has the meaning given in Article 6(A) | |
Section 551 Amount | has the meaning given in Article 12(B)(iv)(c) for the purposes specified there | |
Section 561 Amount | has the meaning given in Article 12(B)(iv)(d) for the purposes specified there | |
Securities Seal | means an official seal kept by the Company for sealing securities issued by the Company, or for sealing documents creating or evidencing securities so issued, as permitted by the Companies Acts | |
Specified Shares | has the meaning given in Article 152(A) | |
sterling | means the lawful currency of the United Kingdom | |
Subsidiary Chairman | has the meaning given in Article 57(E) | |
Subsidiary Locations | has the meaning given in Article 57(B) | |
Substantive Resolutions | means all resolutions other than Procedural Resolutions | |
Transfer Office | means the place where the register of members is situated for the time being | |
Uncertificated Proxy Instruction | has the meaning given in Article 78(C) | |
uncertificated share | means a share in the capital of the Company which is recorded in the register of members as being held in uncertificated form, and title to which may be transferred by means of a relevant system pursuant to the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001 | |
United Kingdom | means the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | |
US dollars | means the lawful currency of the United States of America | |
year | means calendar year |
5
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Interpretation and construction
4 In these Articles:
(i) the expressions debenture and debenture holder shall respectively include debenture stock and debenture stockholder;
(ii) the expression Secretary shall include any person appointed by the Directors to perform any of the duties of the Secretary and where two or more persons are appointed to act as joint secretaries shall include any one of these persons;
(iii) all the provisions of these Articles which are applicable to paid-up shares shall apply to stock, and the words share and shareholder shall be construed accordingly;
(iv) the expressions written and in writing shall include any way of representing or copying words legibly, but shall not (save where the context requires otherwise) include electronic communications;
(v) words denoting persons shall include bodies corporate and unincorporate;
(vi) words denoting the masculine shall include the feminine and vice versa;
(vii) words denoting the singular shall include the plural and vice versa;
(viii) headings are included only for convenience and shall not affect the meaning of these Articles;
(ix) references to any statute or statutory provision shall be construed as relating to any modification or re-enactment of it in force for the time being, and the same principle of construction shall be applied to a statutory instrument or a provision in a statutory instrument;
(x) any words or expressions defined in the Companies Acts and Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001 (as the case may be) shall bear the same meanings in these Articles, unless that meaning is inconsistent with the subject or context, or unless these Articles attribute another meaning to the particular words or expressions;
(xi) the words and phrases other, otherwise, including and in particular shall not limit the generality of any preceding words or be construed as being limited to the same class as the preceding words where a wider construction is possible; and
(xii) any powers of delegation shall not be restrictively construed, but the widest interpretation shall be given to them, and, except where expressly provided by the terms of the delegation in question, delegation of a power shall not exclude the concurrent exercise of that power by any other body or person who is for the time being authorised to exercise it under these Articles or under another delegation of the power.
Share Capital
The Ordinary Shares
5 The Ordinary Shares are issued subject to the Companies Acts and the Articles and rank pari passu in all respects save as provided by, or pursuant to, the Companies Acts or the Articles. At the time these Articles are adopted, each Ordinary Share has a nominal value of US$0.25.
The First and Second Preference Shares
6 (A) The 8 per cent. Cumulative Preference Shares (First Preference Shares) and the 9 per cent. Cumulative Second Preference Shares (Second Preference Shares) had attached thereto respectively on 5th April 1973 the rights as regards participation in the profits and assets of the Company set out below (and have attached thereto at the date of the adoption of these Articles such rights as modified or affected by the provisions of paragraph 18 of Schedule 23 to the Finance Act 1972 and Section 46 of the Finance Act 1976):
(i) the First Preference Shares, together with any further shares hereafter issued ranking pari passu therewith pursuant to the provisions hereinafter contained, entitle the holders to a fixed cumulative preferential dividend on the amounts paid up thereon at the rate of 8 per cent. per annum, and on a return of assets of the Company on winding up to have the assets of the Company available for distribution amongst the members applied in the first place in paying to them (a) the amounts paid up on such First Preference Shares, (b) a sum equal to any arrears or deficiency of the fixed cumulative
6
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
preferential dividend on such First Preference Shares, such arrears or deficiency to be calculated down to the date of the commencement of the winding up, and (c) a sum equal to 10 per cent. on the amounts paid up on the First Preference Shares, or to the average premium above par at which the First Preference Shares have during the six months before the commencement of the winding up been dealt in on the market (such average premium to be certified by the Secretary of the London Stock Exchange), whichever sum is the greater, but the holders of the First Preference Shares shall not be entitled in respect thereof to any further or other participation in the profits or assets of the Company.
(ii) the Second Preference Shares, together with any further shares hereafter issued ranking pari passu therewith pursuant to the provisions hereinafter contained, entitle the holders to a fixed cumulative preferential dividend on the amounts paid up thereon (payable next after the dividend on the First Preference Shares, but in priority to any dividend on the Ordinary Shares) at the rate of 9 per cent. per annum, and on a return of assets of the Company on winding up to have the assets of the Company available for distribution amongst the members and remaining after making to the holders of the First Preference Shares the payments to which they are entitled, applied in the next place in paying to the holders of the Second Preference Shares (a) the amounts paid up on such Second Preference Shares, (b) a sum equal to any arrears or deficiency of the fixed cumulative preferential dividend on such Second Preference Shares, such arrears or deficiency to be calculated down to the date of the commencement of the winding up, and (c) a sum equal to 10 per cent. on the amounts paid up on the Second Preference Shares, or to the average premium above par at which the Second Preference Shares have during the six months before the commencement of the winding up been dealt in on the market (such average premium to be certified by the Secretary of the London Stock Exchange), whichever sum is the greater, but the holders of the Second Preference Shares shall not be entitled in respect thereof to any further or other participation in the profits or assets of the Company.
(B) At the time these Articles are adopted, each First Preference Share has a nominal value of £1 and each Second Preference Share has a nominal value of £1.
(C) Unless otherwise expressly resolved by the Company in general meeting, further shares may be created and issued (without any further sanction or approval by the Company in general meeting or by any class of members thereof pursuant to Article 7) as First Preference Shares ranking pari passu with the First Preference Shares in the present capital, provided that the total nominal amount of such First Preference Shares at any one time in issue shall not exceed £10,000,000, or as Second Preference Shares ranking pari passu with the Second Preference Shares in the present capital, provided that the total nominal amount of such Second Preference Shares at any one time in issue shall not exceed £10,000,000.
(D) Subject as aforesaid no new shares entitled to rank pari passu with or to any preference over the existing First and Second Preference Shares shall be issued by the Company without the sanction of a special resolution of the holders of such Preference Shares passed at a meeting held under the conditions hereinafter contained.
Variation of Rights
Variations of rights which may be made
7 The holders of any class of shares may at any time and from time to time, and whether before or during liquidation, by a special resolution passed at a meeting of such holders, consent on behalf of all the holders of shares of the class to the issue or creation of any shares ranking equally therewith, or having any priority thereto, or to the abandonment of any preference or priority or of any accrued dividend, or the reduction for any time or permanently of the dividends payable thereon, or to the amalgamation into one class of the shares of any two or more classes or to the sub-division of shares of one class into shares of different classes, or any alteration in these Articles varying or taking away any rights or privileges attached to shares of the class, or to any scheme for the reduction of the Companys capital affecting the class of shares in a manner not otherwise authorised by these Articles, or to any scheme for the distribution (though not in accordance with legal rights) of assets in money or in kind in or before liquidation, or to any contract for the sale of the whole or any part of the Companys property or business determining the way in which as between the several classes of shareholders the purchase consideration shall be distributed, and generally consent to any alteration, contract, compromise or arrangement which the persons voting thereon could if sui juris and holding all the shares of the class consent to or enter into, and such resolution shall be binding upon all the holders of shares of the class.
Procedure for variations of rights
8 Any meeting for the purpose of the last preceding Article shall be convened and conducted in all respects as nearly as possible in the same way as a general meeting of the Company which is not an annual general meeting provided that no member, not being a Director, shall be entitled to notice thereof or to attend thereat, unless he be a holder of shares of the class intended to be affected by the resolution, and that no vote shall be given except in respect of a share of that class, and that the quorum at any such meeting shall (subject to the provisions as to an adjourned meeting hereinafter contained) be persons holding or representing by proxy one-tenth of the issued shares of that class (as regards the First Preference Shares and the Second Preference Shares) and one-third of the issued shares of that class (as regards all other classes of share), and that at any such meeting a poll may be demanded in writing by not less than five members present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote.
7
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Alteration of Share Capital
Consolidation and division of shares
9 (A) Whenever as a result of a consolidation and division or sub-division of shares any difficulty arises, the Directors may settle the matter in any manner they deem fit, and, in particular, may sell shares representing fractions to which any members would become entitled to any person (including, subject to the provisions of the Companies Acts, the Company) and distribute the net proceeds of sale in due proportion among those members or retain such net proceeds of sale for the benefit of the Company, and the Directors may authorise some person to execute any instrument, or give any instruction, or do any act or thing, for the purpose of transferring the shares to, or in accordance with the directions of, the purchaser. The transferee shall not be bound to see to the application of the purchase money nor shall his title to the shares be affected by any irregularity in or invalidity of the proceedings relating to the sale.
(B) Without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (A) above, the Directors may treat certificated shares and uncertificated shares of a single holder (or of the same joint holders) as separate holdings in giving effect to sub-divisions and/or consolidations, and the Directors may at their absolute discretion cause any shares arising on sub-division or consolidation and representing fractional entitlements to be entered in the register of members as certificated shares or as uncertificated shares where this is desirable to facilitate the sale of such shares.
Redenomination of shares
10 The Company in general meeting may from time to time by ordinary resolution redenominate its share capital by converting shares from having a fixed nominal value in one currency to having a fixed nominal value in another currency.
Shares
Issue of shares
11 (A) Without prejudice to any special rights previously conferred on the holders of any shares or class of shares for the time being issued, any share in the Company may be issued with such (if any) preferred, deferred or other special rights, or subject to such restrictions, whether as regards dividend, return of capital, voting or otherwise, as the Company may from time to time by ordinary resolution determine (or, in the absence of any such determination, as the Directors may determine).
(B) Subject to the provisions of the Companies Acts the Company may issue any shares which are, or at the option of the Company or the holder are liable, to be redeemed. The Directors may determine the terms, conditions and manner of the redemption of any redeemable shares.
Allotment of shares etc
12 (A) Subject to the provisions of the Companies Acts relating to authority, pre-emption rights and otherwise and of any resolution of the Company in general meeting passed pursuant thereto, all shares to be issued in the Company and all (if any) shares in the Company lawfully held by or on behalf of it shall be at the disposal of the Directors, and they may allot (with or without conferring a right of renunciation), grant options over or otherwise dispose of them to such persons, at such times and on such terms as they think proper.
(B) (i) Pursuant to and in accordance with Section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 the Directors shall be generally and unconditionally authorised to exercise for each prescribed period all the powers of the Company to allot relevant securities up to an aggregate nominal amount equal to the Section 551 Amount; and
(ii) pursuant to and within the terms of the said authority or otherwise in accordance with Section 570 of the Companies Act 2006 the Directors shall be empowered during each prescribed period to allot equity securities wholly for cash (a) in connection with a rights issue; and (b) otherwise than in connection with a rights issue up to an aggregate nominal amount equal to the Section 561 Amount; and
(iii) during each prescribed period the Company and its Directors by such authority and power may make offers or agreements which would or might require equity securities or other relevant securities to be allotted after the expiry of such period; and
8
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(iv) for the purposes of this Article 12(B):
(a) rights issue means an offer of equity securities open for acceptance for a period fixed by the Directors to holders of equity securities on the register on a fixed record date in proportion to their respective holdings of such securities or in accordance with the rights attached thereto but subject to such exclusions or other arrangements as the Directors may deem necessary or expedient in relation to fractional entitlements or legal or practical problems under the laws of, or the requirements of any recognised regulatory body or any stock exchange in, any territory or as regards shares held by an Approved Depositary;
(b) prescribed period means any period (not exceeding five years on any occasion) for which the authority conferred in the case of sub-paragraph (i) is conferred or renewed by ordinary or special resolution stating the Section 551 Amount, and the power conferred in the case of sub-paragraph (ii) is conferred or renewed by special resolution stating the Section 561 Amount;
(c) the Section 551 Amount shall for any prescribed period be that stated in the relevant ordinary or special resolution;
(d) the Section 561 Amount shall for any prescribed period be that stated in the relevant special resolution;
(e) the nominal amount of any securities shall be taken to be, in the case of rights to subscribe for or to convert any securities into shares of the Company, the nominal amount of such shares which may be allotted pursuant to such rights; and
(f) words and expressions defined in or for the purposes of Part 17 Chapters 2 6 of the Companies Act 2006 shall bear the same meanings herein.
Commissions
13 The Company may exercise the powers of paying commissions conferred by the Companies Acts to the full extent thereby permitted. The Company may also on any issue of shares pay such brokerage as may be lawful.
Renunciation of allotments
14 The Directors may at any time after the allotment of any share but before any person has been entered in the register of members as the holder recognise a renunciation thereof by the allottee in favour of some other person and may accord to any allottee of a share a right to effect such renunciation upon and subject to such terms and conditions as the Directors may think fit to impose.
No recognition of trusts etc
15 Except only as required by law or as otherwise provided by these Articles:
(i) no person shall be recognised by the Company as holding any share upon any trust; and
(ii) the Company shall not be bound by or compelled in any way to recognise any equitable, contingent, future or partial interest in any share, or any interest in any fractional part of a share, or any other right in respect of any share except an absolute right to the entirety thereof in the registered holder.
Form of Shares
Issue of certificated or uncertificated shares
16 In so far as permitted by law, and without having to consult any shareholder, the Directors may at any time or times do all or any of the following for any purpose they see fit:
(i) cause shares issued by the Company to be issued as certificated shares or uncertificated shares;
(ii) permit any shares in the Company to be held as certificated shares or uncertificated shares;
(iii) permit the transfer of any uncertificated shares in the Company by means of a relevant system;
(iv) make such arrangements as they think fit for shares in the Company to be held and transferred as uncertificated shares, and to be converted from certificated shares to uncertificated shares or vice versa;
9
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(v) determine that any shares in the Company shall cease to be held and transferred as uncertificated shares.
Form of shares not to affect classes
17 Notwithstanding any other provision of these Articles, it shall be irrelevant, when determining whether or not shares form a class or classes of shares, that some of the shares in question are held or permitted to be held as certificated shares and others as uncertificated shares.
Restriction of the effect of these Articles on uncertificated shares
18 Subject to the Directors power to determine that any shares in the Company shall cease to be held and transferred as uncertificated shares, the provisions of these Articles shall not apply to any shares held as uncertificated shares to the extent that such provisions are inconsistent with:
(i) the holding of such shares as uncertificated shares;
(ii) the transfer of title to such shares by means of a relevant system; or
(iii) any provision of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001.
Share certificates
19 Every share certificate shall be executed by the Company under the Seal or the Securities Seal (or, in the case of shares on a branch register, an official seal for use in the relevant territory) or under such other form of authentication as the Directors may determine (which may include manual or facsimile signatures by one or more Directors or by the Secretary). No certificate shall be issued representing shares of more than one class. No certificate shall normally be issued in respect of shares held by a financial institution.
Joint holders of certificated shares
20 In the case of a certificated share held jointly by several persons the Company shall not be bound to issue more than one certificate therefor and delivery of a certificate to one of the joint holders shall be sufficient delivery to all.
Entitlement to share certificates
21 Any person (subject as aforesaid) whose name is entered in the register of members in respect of any certificated shares of any one class upon the issue or transfer thereof shall (subject, in the case of issue, to the terms of the issue of any such shares) be entitled without payment to a certificate within the time limit prescribed by the Companies Acts.
General provisions about share certificates
22 (A) Where some only of the shares comprised in a share certificate are transferred the old certificate shall be cancelled and a new certificate for the balance of such shares issued in lieu without charge.
(B) Any two or more certificates representing shares of any one class held by any member may at his request be cancelled and a single new certificate for such shares issued in lieu without charge.
(C) If any member shall surrender for cancellation a share certificate representing shares held by him and request the Company to issue in lieu share certificates representing such shares in such proportions as he may specify, the Directors may, if they think fit, comply with such request.
(D) If a share certificate shall be damaged or defaced or alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed, a new certificate representing the same shares may be issued to the holder upon request subject to delivery up of the old certificate or (if alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed) compliance with such conditions as to evidence and indemnity and the payment of out-of-pocket expenses of the Company in connection with the request as the Directors may think fit.
(E) In the case of shares held jointly by several persons any such request may be made by any one of the joint holders.
Calls on Shares
Power to make calls on shares
23 The Directors may from time to time make calls upon the members in respect of any moneys unpaid on their shares (whether on account of the nominal value of the shares, or when permitted, by way of premium) but subject always to the terms of issue of such shares. A call shall be deemed to have been made at the time when the resolution of the Directors authorising the call was passed and may be made payable by instalments.
10
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Payment of calls
24 Each member shall (subject to receiving at least fourteen days notice specifying the time or times and place of payment) pay to the Company at the time or times and place so specified the amount called on his shares. The joint holders of a share shall be jointly and severally liable to pay all calls in respect thereof. A call may be revoked or postponed as the Directors may determine.
Interest on unpaid calls
25 If a sum called in respect of a share is not paid before or on the day appointed for payment thereof, the person from whom the sum is due shall pay interest on the sum from the day appointed for payment thereof to the time of actual payment at such rate (not exceeding fifteen per cent. per annum) as the Directors may determine but the Directors shall be at liberty in any case or cases to waive payment of such interest wholly or in part.
Failure to pay sums due on shares
26 Any sum (whether on account of the nominal value of the share or by way of premium) which by the terms of issue of a share becomes payable upon allotment or at any fixed date shall for all the purposes of these Articles be deemed to be a call duly made and payable on the date on which by the term of issue the same becomes payable. In case of non-payment all the relevant provisions of these Articles as to payment of interest and expenses, forfeiture or otherwise shall apply as if such sum had become payable by virtue of a call duly made and notified.
Powers of the Directors in connection with sums due in respect of shares
27 (A) The Directors may on the issue of shares differentiate between the holders as to the amount of calls to be paid and the times of payment.
(B) The Directors may if they think fit receive from any member willing to advance the same all or any part of the moneys (whether on account of the nominal value of the shares or by way of premium) uncalled and unpaid upon the shares held by him and such payment in advance of calls shall extinguish, to the extent of such payment, the liability upon the shares in respect of which it is made and upon the money so received (until and to the extent that the same would but for such advance become payable) the Company may pay interest at such rate (not exceeding twelve per cent. per annum) as the member paying such sum and the Directors may agree.
(C) Whenever any law for the time being of any country, state or place imposes or purports to impose any immediate or future or possible liability upon the Company to make any payment or empowers any government or taxing authority or government official to require the Company to make any payment in respect of any shares registered in any of the Companys registers as held either jointly or solely by any member or in respect of any dividends, bonuses or other moneys due or payable or accruing due or which may become due or payable to such member by the Company on or in respect of any shares registered as aforesaid or for or on account or in respect of any member and whether in consequence of:
(i) the death of such member;
(ii) the non-payment of any income tax or other tax by such member;
(iii) the non-payment of any estate, probate, succession, death, stamp, or other duty by the executor or administrator of such member or by or out of his estate; or
(iv) any other act or thing,
the Company in every such case:
(a) shall be fully indemnified by such member or his executor or administrator from all liability; and
(b) may recover as a debt due from such member or his executor or administrator wherever constituted or residing any monies paid by the Company under or in consequence of any such law together with interest thereon at the rate of fifteen per cent. per annum thereon from date of payment to date of repayment.
(D) Nothing contained in paragraphs (B) and (C) above shall prejudice or affect any right or remedy which any law may confer or purport to confer on the Company and as between the Company and every such member as aforesaid, his executor, administrator, and estate wheresoever constituted or situated, any right or remedy which such law shall confer or purport to confer on the Company shall be enforceable by the Company.
11
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Forfeiture and Lien
Notice to pay sums due on shares
28 If a member fails to pay in full any call or instalment of a call on the due date for payment thereof, the Directors may at any time thereafter serve a notice on him requiring payment of so much of the call or instalment as is unpaid together with any interest which may have accrued thereon and any expenses incurred by the Company by reason of such non-payment.
Contents of a notice to pay
29 The notice shall name a further day (not being less than seven days from the date of service of the notice) on or before which and the place where the payment required by the notice is to be made, and shall state that in the event of non-payment in accordance therewith the shares on which the call has been made will be liable to be forfeited.
Forfeiture or surrender of shares for non-payment
30 If the requirements of any such notice as aforesaid are not complied with, any share in respect of which such notice has been given may at any time thereafter, before payment of all calls and interest and expenses due in respect thereof has been made, be forfeited by a resolution of the Directors to that effect. Such forfeiture shall include all dividends declared in respect of the forfeited share and not actually paid before forfeiture. The Directors may accept a surrender of any share liable to be forfeited hereunder.
Powers of the Directors on forfeiture or surrender
31 A share so forfeited or surrendered shall become the property of the Company and may be sold, re-allotted or otherwise disposed of either to the person who was before such forfeiture or surrender the holder thereof or entitled thereto or to any other person upon such terms and in such manner as the Directors shall think fit and at any time before a sale, re-allotment or disposition the forfeiture or surrender may be cancelled on such terms as the Directors think fit. Where for the purposes of its disposal a forfeited share is to be transferred to any person:
(i) in the case of a share in certificated form, the Directors may authorise any person to execute an instrument of transfer and take such other steps (including the giving of directions to or on behalf of the holder, who shall be bound by them) as they think fit to effect the transfer; and
(ii) in the case of a share in uncertificated form, the Directors may, to enable the Company to deal with the share in accordance with the provisions of this Article 31, require the Operator of a relevant system to convert the share into certificated form, and after such conversion, authorise any person to execute an instrument of transfer and take such other steps (including the giving of directions to or on behalf of the holder, who shall be bound by them) as they think fit to effect the transfer.
Continuing liabilities after forfeiture or surrender
32 A member whose shares have been forfeited or surrendered shall cease to be a member in respect of the shares but shall notwithstanding the forfeiture or surrender remain liable to pay to the Company all moneys which at the date of forfeiture or surrender were presently payable by him to the Company in respect of the shares with interest thereon at fifteen per cent. per annum (or such lower rate as the Directors may determine) from the date of forfeiture or surrender until payment and the Directors may at their absolute discretion enforce payment without any allowance for the value of the shares at the time of forfeiture or surrender or waive payment in whole or in part.
Lien
33 The Company shall have a first and paramount lien on every share (not being a fully paid share) for all moneys (whether presently payable or not) called or payable at a fixed time in respect of such share and the Company shall also have a first and paramount lien on every share (not being a fully paid share) standing registered in the name of a single member for all the debts and liabilities of such member or his estate to the Company whether the same shall have been incurred before or after notice to the Company of any equitable or other interest of any person other than such member and whether the period for the payment or discharge of the same shall have actually arrived or not and notwithstanding that the same are joint debts or liabilities of such member or his estate and any other person, whether a member of the Company or not. The Companys lien over a share takes priority over any third partys interest in that share, and extends to any dividend or other money payable by the Company in respect of that share (and, if the lien is enforced and the share is sold by the Company, the proceeds of sale of that share). The Directors may waive any lien which has arisen and may resolve that any share shall for some limited period be exempt wholly or partially from the provisions of this Article 33.
12
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Exercise of lien
34 The Company may sell in such manner as the Directors think fit any share on which the Company has a lien, but no sale shall be made unless some sum in respect of which the lien exists is presently payable nor until the expiration of fourteen days after a notice stating and demanding payment of the sum presently payable and giving notice of intention to sell in default shall have been given to the holder for the time being of the share or the person entitled thereto by reason of the holders death or bankruptcy or otherwise by operation of law. To give effect to any such sale:
(i) in the case of a share in certificated form, the Directors may authorise any person to execute an instrument of transfer of the share to the purchaser of the share or a person nominated by the purchaser of the share and take such other steps (including the giving of directions to or on behalf of the holder, who shall be bound by them) as they think fit to effect the transfer; and
(ii) in the case of a share in uncertificated form, the Directors may, to enable the Company to deal with the share in accordance with the provisions of this Article 34, require the operator of a relevant system to convert the share into certificated form, and after such conversion, authorise any person to execute an instrument of transfer and take such other steps (including the giving of directions to or on behalf of the holder, who shall be bound by them) as they think fit to effect the transfer.
Application of proceeds of sale after exercise of lien
35 The net proceeds of such sale after payment of the costs of such sale shall be applied in or towards payment or satisfaction of the debts or liabilities in respect whereof the lien exists so far as the same are then payable and any residue shall (subject to a like lien for debts or liabilities not presently payable as existed upon the shares prior to the sale) be paid to the person entitled to the shares at the time of the sale.
Evidence of title to shares following exercise of lien
36 A statutory declaration that the declarant is a Director or the Secretary of the Company and that a share has been duly forfeited or surrendered or sold to satisfy a lien of the Company on a date stated in the declaration shall be conclusive evidence of the facts therein stated as against all persons claiming to be entitled to the share. Such declaration, and the receipt of the Company for the consideration (if any) given for the share on the sale, re-allotment or disposal thereof, together with, in relation to a certificated share, the share certificate delivered to a purchaser or allottee thereof, shall (subject if necessary to the execution of an instrument of transfer or a transfer by a relevant system, as the case may be) constitute a good title to the share, and the person to whom the share is sold, re-allotted or disposed of shall be registered as the holder of the share and shall not be bound to see to the application of the purchase money (if any) nor shall his title to the share be affected by any irregularity or invalidity in the proceedings relating to the forfeiture, surrender, sale, re-allotment or disposal of the share.
Transfer of Shares and Related Matters
Form of transfer of certificated shares
37 All transfers of shares, other than shares represented by uncertificated shares, may be effected by transfer in writing in any usual or common form or in any other form acceptable to the Directors and may be under hand only. The instrument of transfer (if any) shall be signed by or on behalf of the transferor and (except in the case of fully paid shares) by or on behalf of the transferee. The transferor shall remain the holder of the shares concerned until the name of the transferee is entered in the register of members in respect thereof.
Form of transfer of uncertificated shares
38 Where any class of shares is, for the time being, a participating security, title to shares of that class which are recorded on an Operator register of members as being held in uncertificated form may be transferred by means of the relevant system concerned. The transfer may not be in favour of more than four persons jointly.
Refusal to register transfers of shares
39 (A) The Directors may, in their absolute discretion, refuse to register the transfer of a share which is not fully paid. The Directors may also refuse to register a transfer of shares (whether fully paid or not) in favour of more than four persons jointly.
(B) If the Directors refuse to register a transfer, they shall send to the transferee notice of such refusal as soon as practicable and in any event within two months after the date on which (in the case of certificated shares) the transfer was
13
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
lodged with the Company or (in the case of uncertificated shares) the Operator-instruction was received (within the meaning of the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001).
Refusal to recognise instruments of transfer
40 The Directors may decline to recognise any instrument of transfer relating to shares in certificated form unless the instrument of transfer is in respect of only one class of share and is lodged at the Transfer Office accompanied by the relevant share certificate(s) and such other evidence as the Directors may reasonably require to show the right of the transferor to make the transfer (and, if the instrument of transfer is executed by some other person on his behalf, the authority of that person so to do). In the case of a transfer by a financial institution the lodgement of share certificates will only be necessary if and to the extent that certificates have been issued in respect of the shares in question.
Retention of instruments of transfer
41 All instruments of transfer which are registered may be retained by the Company.
No fee for registration of transfers etc
42 No fee will be charged by the Company in respect of the registration of any instrument of transfer or probate or letters of administration or certificate of marriage or death or stop notice or power of attorney relating to or affecting the title to any shares.
Retention of records
43 (A) The Company shall be entitled to destroy:
(i) all instruments of transfer of shares which have been registered, and all other documents on the basis of which any entry is made in the register, at any time after the expiration of six years from the date of registration or entry;
(ii) all dividend mandates, variations or cancellations of dividend mandates, and notifications of change of address at any time after the expiration of two years from the date of recording the matters in such document;
(iii) all share certificates which have been cancelled at any time after the expiration of one year from the date of the cancellation;
(iv) all paid dividend warrants and cheques at any time after the expiration of one year from the date of actual payment;
(v) all proxy appointments which have been used for the purpose of a poll at any time after the expiration of one year from the date of use; and
(vi) all proxy appointments which have not been used for the purpose of a poll at any time after one month from the end of the meeting to which the proxy appointment relates and at which no poll was demanded.
(B) Any document referred to in paragraph (A) of this Article 43 may be destroyed earlier than the relevant date authorised by that paragraph, provided that a copy of the document (whether made electronically, by microfilm, by digital imaging or by any other means) has been made which is not destroyed before that date.
(C) It shall conclusively be presumed in favour of the Company that:
(i) every entry in the register purporting to have been made on the basis of an instrument of transfer or other document destroyed in accordance with this Article 43 was duly and properly made;
(ii) every instrument of transfer destroyed in accordance with this Article 43 was a valid and effective instrument duly and properly registered;
(iii) every share certificate destroyed in accordance with this Article 43 was a valid and effective certificate duly and properly cancelled; and
(iv) every other document destroyed in accordance with this Article 43 was a valid and effective document in accordance with its recorded particulars in the books or records of the Company,
but:
14
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(a) the provisions of this Article 43 apply only to the destruction of a document in good faith and without notice of any claim (regardless of the parties) to which the document might be relevant;
(b) nothing in this Article 43 shall be construed as imposing on the Company any liability in respect of the destruction of any document earlier than the time specified in paragraph (A) above (subject always to paragraph (B) above) or in any other circumstances which would not attach to the Company in the absence of this Article 43; and
(c) any reference in this Article 43 to the destruction of any document includes a reference to its disposal in any manner or deletion.
Transmission of Shares
Succession to shares
44 In the case of the death of a shareholder, the survivors or survivor where the deceased was a joint holder, and the executors or administrators of the deceased where he was a sole or only surviving holder, shall be the only persons recognised by the Company as having any title to his interest in the shares, but nothing in this Article 44 shall release the estate of a deceased holder (whether sole or joint) from any liability in respect of any share held by him.
Registration of succession to shares
45 Any person becoming entitled to a share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of a member or otherwise by operation of law, may (subject as hereinafter provided) upon supplying to the Company such evidence as the Directors may reasonably require to show his title to the share either be registered himself as holder of the share upon giving to the Company notice in writing of his desire to be registered as holder or transfer such share to some other person. If he elects to have another person registered he shall transfer title to the share to that person. All the limitations, restrictions and provisions of these Articles relating to the right to transfer and the registration of transfers of shares shall be applicable to any such notice or transfer as aforesaid as if the death or bankruptcy of the member or entitlement to the share by operation of law, had not occurred and the notice or transfer were a transfer made by such member. A person entitled to a share who has elected for that share to be transferred to some other person pursuant to this Article 45 shall cease to be entitled to any rights in relation to such share upon that other person being registered as the holder of that share.
Rights of successors to shares
46 Save as otherwise provided by or in accordance with these Articles, a person becoming entitled to a share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of a member or otherwise by operation of law (upon supplying to the Company such evidence as the Directors may reasonably require to show his title to the share) shall be entitled to the same rights as those to which he would be entitled if he were the registered holder of the share except that he shall not be entitled in respect thereof (except with the authority of the Directors) to exercise any right conferred by membership in relation to meetings of the Company until he shall have been registered as a member in respect of the share.
Untraced Shareholders
47 (A) The Company shall be entitled to sell the shares of a member or the shares to which a person is entitled by virtue of transmission on death or bankruptcy or otherwise by operation of law if and provided that:
(i) during the period of twelve years prior to the sending of the notice referred to in sub-paragraph (ii) below, at least three dividends have become payable on or in respect of the shares in question but all dividends or other moneys payable on or in respect of such shares during such period remain unclaimed;
(ii) the Company has, after the expiration of the said period of twelve years, sent a notice to the registered address or last known address of the member or other person entitled, stating that it intends to sell the shares, and before sending such a notice to the member or other person entitled, the Company must have used reasonable efforts to trace the member or other person entitled, engaging, if considered appropriate, a professional asset reunification company or other tracing agent; and
(iii) during the said period of twelve years and the period of three months after sending the notice referred to in sub-paragraph (ii) above, the Company shall not have received indication of either the whereabouts or of the existence of such member or person entitled.
15
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(B) The Company shall also be entitled to sell any additional share issued during the said period of 12 years and three months in right of any share to which paragraph (A) of this Article 47 applies (or in right of any share so issued), if the criteria in sub-paragraphs (ii) and (iii) are satisfied in relation to the additional share (but as if the words after the expiration of the said period of twelve years were omitted from sub-paragraph (ii) and as if the words the said period of twelve years and were omitted from sub-paragraph (iii), and no dividend has been claimed on that additional share.
(C) To give effect to the sale of any share pursuant to this Article 47:
(i) in the case of a share in certificated form, the Directors may authorise any person to execute an instrument of transfer of the share to the purchaser or a person nominated by the purchaser and take such other steps (including the giving of directions to or on behalf of the holder, who shall be bound by them) as it thinks fit to effect the transfer; and
(ii) in the case of a share in uncertificated form, the Directors may, to enable the Company to deal with the share in accordance with the provisions of this Article 47, require the Operator of a relevant system to convert the share into certificated form, and after such conversion, authorise any person to execute an instrument of transfer and take such other steps (including the giving of directions to or on behalf of the holder, who shall be bound by them) as it thinks fit to effect the transfer,
and the title of the transferee shall not be affected by any irregularity or invalidity in the proceedings relating thereto.
(D) The net proceeds of sale under this Article 47 shall belong to the Company which shall, subject to the provisions of this paragraph (D), be obliged to account to the former member or other person previously entitled as aforesaid for an amount equal to such proceeds and shall enter the name of such former member or other person in the books of the Company as a creditor for such amount. No trust shall be created in respect of the debt, no interest shall be payable in respect of the same and the Company shall not be required to account for any money earned on the net proceeds, which may be employed in the business of the Company or invested in such investments (other than shares of the Company or its holding company if any) as the Directors may from time to time think fit. If no valid claim for the proceeds has been received by the Company during a period of two years from the date on which the relevant shares were sold by the Company under this Article 47, the net proceeds of sale shall be forfeited and such former member or other previously entitled person shall no longer be a creditor for such amount and the Company will not be obliged to account to such person for, or be liable to such person in relation to, the proceeds of sale.
General Meetings
Convening general meetings
48 (A) An annual general meeting shall be held once in every year, at such time (consistent with the terms of the Companies Acts) and place as may be determined by the Directors.
(B) The Directors may whenever they think fit, and shall on requisition in accordance with the Companies Acts, proceed with proper expedition to convene a general meeting which is not an annual general meeting.
(C) If there are not sufficient Directors to form a quorum in order to call a general meeting, any director may call a general meeting and Article 105 shall apply.
Location of general meetings
49 Every general meeting which is held at a single location shall be held in England. The Principal Place of every general meeting which is held at more than one location shall be in England, and the Subsidiary Location or Subsidiary Locations may be in England or elsewhere.
Members resolutions
50 (A) Members of the Company shall have the rights provided by the Companies Acts to have the Company circulate and give notice of a resolution which may be properly moved, and is intended to be moved, at the Companys next annual general meeting.
(B) Expenses of complying with these rights shall be borne in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Acts, save as provided in paragraphs (C) and (D) below.
16
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(C) The Company shall bear the expenses of complying with these rights, even if not required to do so under the Companies Acts, if the Companys obligation to give notice of the resolution arises on or before 21 January next preceding the annual general meeting in question, or such other date as the Directors may resolve.
(D) The Directors shall have power to waive, whether prospectively or retrospectively, and on such terms and conditions (if any) as they think fit, any obligation to meet or pay the expenses of the Company in complying with these rights.
Postponement of meetings
51 If the Directors, in their absolute discretion, consider that it is impractical or unreasonable to hold a general meeting on the date or at the time or place specified in the notice calling the general meeting, they may postpone the general meeting to another date, time and/or place. The Directors shall take reasonable steps to ensure that notice of the date, time and place of the postponed meeting is provided to any member trying to attend the meeting at the original time and place. When a meeting is so postponed, notice of the date, time and place of the postponed meeting shall be given in such manner as the Directors may in their absolute discretion determine. Notice of the business to be transacted at such postponed meeting shall not be required. If a meeting is postponed in accordance with this Article 51, the appointment of a proxy will be valid if it is delivered and received as required by these Articles not less than 48 hours before the time appointed for holding the postponed meeting and, for the purpose of calculating this period, the Directors can decide, in their absolute discretion, not to take account of any part of a day that is not a working day. The Directors may (for the avoidance of doubt) also postpone any meeting which has been rearranged under this Article 51.
Class meetings
52 Subject to the Companies Acts, the provisions of these Articles relating to general meetings shall apply, with necessary modifications, to any separate meeting of the holders of shares of a particular class which is convened otherwise than in connection with the variation or abrogation of the rights attached to shares of that class.
Notice of General Meetings and Related Arrangements
Giving notice
53 A general meeting of the Company shall be called by notice of at least such length as is required in the circumstances by the Companies Acts. The Company may give such notice by any means or combination of means permitted by law. Where the Company has given an electronic address in any notice of meeting, any document or information relating to proceedings at the meeting may be sent by electronic means to that address, subject to any conditions or limitations specified in the relevant notice of meeting.
Omission or failure to give notice and non-receipt of notice
54 To the fullest extent permitted by law, the accidental omission to give notice to, or the failure to give notice due to circumstances beyond the Companys control to, or the non-receipt of notice by, any person entitled thereto shall not invalidate the proceedings at any general meeting.
Recipients of notice
55 Subject to the provisions of these Articles and to any rights or restrictions attached to any shares, notices shall be given to all members, to all persons entitled to a share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of a member or otherwise by operation of law and to the Directors and auditors of the Company.
Contents of notices
56 (A) Every notice calling a general meeting shall specify the place and the day and hour of the meeting, and where there are to be any Subsidiary Locations in accordance with Article 57 below it shall specify the Principal Place and may specify any one or more of the Subsidiary Locations.
(B) There shall appear with reasonable prominence in every such notice a statement that a member entitled to attend and vote is entitled to appoint a proxy or (if he holds more than one share) proxies to attend, speak and vote instead of him and that a proxy need not be a member of the Company.
(C) In the case of an annual general meeting, the notice shall also specify the meeting as such.
(D) The notice of any general meeting shall set out the text of all Substantive Resolutions to be considered by the meeting and shall state in the case of each resolution whether it is to be proposed as an ordinary resolution or as a special resolution.
17
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(E) For the purposes of determining which persons are entitled to attend or vote at a meeting and how many votes such persons may cast, the Company may specify in the notice of the meeting a time, not more than forty-eight hours before the time fixed for the meeting, by which a person who holds shares in registered form must be entered on the Register in order to have the right to attend or vote at the meeting or to appoint a proxy to do so. In calculating any period specified for the purposes of this Article 56(E), no account shall be taken of any part of a day that is not a working day.
Arrangements in connection with meetings
57 (A) The Directors may, from time to time and in their absolute discretion, make such arrangements as they see fit in connection with the organisation and administration of any general meeting. Such arrangements may govern admission to the meeting, or admission to a particular location from which people participate in the meeting. Any such arrangements shall only be made on a basis that they are intended to be fair and equitable as between all members and proxies otherwise entitled to attend the meeting. The entitlement of any member or proxy to attend a general meeting, or to participate in it at a particular place, shall be subject to such arrangements as may be for the time being in force and are by the notice of meeting stated to apply to that meeting.
(B) In the case of a general meeting where the Directors determine that participation in the meeting shall be possible at more than one place the Directors shall direct that the meeting be held at a place specified in the notice (Principal Place) at which the chairman of the meeting shall preside, and also make provision for participation in the meeting at other places (Subsidiary Locations) by members and proxies. In any such case, the Directors shall cause arrangements to be made as are reasonable to attempt to ensure that all persons attending the meeting (in whatever place or location) are able to participate (if entitled to do so) in the business of the meeting and are able to see and hear anyone else attending the meeting while that person is addressing the meeting. In any such case, the Directors may also make arrangements of the type described in paragraph (A) above regarding attendance at, and admission to, a particular place or location, provided that any such arrangements shall operate (so far as possible) so that any members and proxies entitled to attend the meeting are able to do so at one or other place or location.
(C) For the purposes of all other provisions of these Articles any meeting which has a Principal Place and one or more Subsidiary Locations shall be treated as being held and taking place at the Principal Place and as attended by members and duly appointed proxies who are present at the Principal Place or at one of the Subsidiary Locations and the powers of the chairman of the meeting shall apply equally to the Subsidiary Locations, including his power to adjourn the meeting, referred to in Article 62.
(D) Under no circumstance will a failure (for any reason) of communication equipment, or any other failure in the arrangements for participation in the meeting at more than one place, affect the validity of such meeting at the Principal Place, or any business conducted thereat, or any action taken pursuant thereto.
(E) A person (Subsidiary Chairman) shall preside at each one of the Subsidiary Locations (if any). Each Subsidiary Chairman shall be appointed by the Directors, or by some person to whom they have delegated the task. Every Subsidiary Chairman shall have the powers vested in him by or under these Articles.
(F) Every Subsidiary Chairman shall keep good order at the location where he is presiding, and he shall have all powers necessary or desirable for that purpose. Every Subsidiary Chairman shall also carry out all requests made of him by or on behalf of the chairman of the meeting in which he is participating, and he shall have all powers necessary or desirable for that purpose.
(G) As well as (or instead of) making provision for one or more Subsidiary Locations, the Directors may allow the proceedings of a meeting or any part of them to be viewed elsewhere, whether by a televisual link or by any other means, but any such viewing by any person shall not form part of, or in any way affect the business of, the meeting in question.
(H) Directors may attend and speak at general meetings and at any separate meeting of the holders of any class of shares, whether or not they are members. The Directors may in their absolute discretion permit any person who is not otherwise entitled to do so to attend and, at the chairman of the meetings absolute discretion, speak at a general meeting or at any separate class meeting.
Powers to promote security at meetings
58 The Directors, and also the Secretary, may take any action before the commencement of any general meeting, or any meeting of a class of members in the Company, which they or he may think fit to ensure the security of the meeting, the safety of people attending the meeting, and the future orderly conduct of the meeting. Any decision made in good faith under this Article 58 shall be final, and rights to attend and participate in the meeting concerned shall be subject to such decision.
18
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Proceedings at General Meetings
Chairman
59 (A) The Chairman, failing whom another Director nominated prior to the general meeting by the Directors, shall preside as chairman of the general meeting. If there is no such Chairman or Director nominated prior to the general meeting by the Directors as chairman, or if at any general meeting neither be present within five minutes after the time appointed for holding the general meeting and willing to act, the Directors present shall choose one of their number to be chairman of the meeting and if there is only one Director present he shall be chairman of the meeting.
(B) If no Director is present or if all of the Directors present decline to take the chair, the members present and entitled to vote shall choose one of their number to be chairman of the general meeting.
Quorum
60 No business other than the appointment of a chairman shall be transacted at any general meeting unless a quorum is present at the time when the meeting proceeds to business. Five members present in person, or by proxy, and entitled to vote shall be a quorum for all purposes.
Consequences of a lack of quorum
61 If within five minutes from the time appointed for a general meeting (or such longer interval as the chairman of the meeting may think fit to allow) a quorum is not present, the meeting, if convened on the requisition of members, shall be dissolved. In any other case, if the meeting has no chairman at that time, a chairman shall first be appointed in accordance with Article 59, then the meeting shall stand adjourned to such other day and such time and place, being at least 10 days after the original meeting, as the chairman of the meeting may determine. Notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given in any manner in which notice of a meeting may lawfully be given for the time being. At the adjourned meeting any two members present in person or by proxy shall be a quorum.
Adjournments
62 The chairman of any general meeting at which a quorum is present may with or without the consent of the meeting (and shall if so directed by the meeting) adjourn the meeting from time to time (or sine die ) and from place to place, but no business shall be transacted at any adjourned meeting except business which might lawfully have been transacted at the meeting from which the adjournment took place. If so adjourned, the chairman of the meeting shall either specify the time and place to which it is adjourned or state that it is adjourned to such time and place as the Directors may determine. When a meeting is adjourned for thirty days or more or sine die , not less than seven days notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given in any manner in which notice of a meeting may lawfully be given for the time being.
Notice of adjourned meetings etc
63 Save as hereinbefore expressly provided and subject to the Companies Acts, it shall not be necessary to give any notice of an adjournment or of the business to be transacted at an adjourned meeting.
Passing Substantive Resolutions
64 (A) Subject to paragraph (B) of this Article 64 and subject to the Companies Acts no Substantive Resolution may be considered or passed at a general meeting unless the text of the resolution was set out in the notice by which the meeting was convened.
(B) A Substantive Resolution may be amended (for example by correcting grammatical or clerical errors which can be corrected as a matter of construction of the resolution set out in the notice when read together with any circular which accompanied the notice, or by reducing the words to a more formal language) provided that there is no departure from the substance of the resolution which was set out in the notice by which the meeting was convened. A ruling by the chairman in good faith in relation to any such amendment shall be final and conclusive and any error in such ruling shall not invalidate the proceedings on the resolution.
(C) The chairman of the meeting shall have power in his absolute discretion to determine whether a resolution is a Procedural Resolution or a Substantive Resolution and his decision made in good faith shall be final and conclusive.
Effectiveness of types of resolution
65 A special resolution shall be effective for any purpose for which an ordinary resolution is expressed to be required under any provision of these Articles or the Companies Acts.
19
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Manner of voting
66 (A) At any general meeting all Substantive Resolutions put to the vote of the meeting shall be decided on a poll and all Procedural Resolutions put to the vote of the meeting shall be decided on a show of hands unless a poll is (before or on the declaration of the result of the show of hands) demanded by:
(i) the chairman of the meeting; or
(ii) not less than five members present in person or by proxy and having the right to vote on the resolution; or
(iii) a member or members present in person or by proxy and representing not less than one-tenth of the total voting rights of all the members having the right to vote on the resolution (excluding any voting rights attached to any shares in the Company held as treasury shares); or
(iv) a member or members present in person or by proxy and holding shares in the Company conferring a right to vote on the resolution, being shares on which an aggregate sum has been paid up equal to not less than one-tenth of the total sum paid up on all the shares conferring that right (excluding shares in the Company conferring a right to vote on the resolution which are held as treasury shares).
(B) Unless a poll is required or demanded a declaration by the chairman of the meeting that a Procedural Resolution has been carried, or carried unanimously, or by a particular majority, or lost, and an entry to that effect in the minute book, shall be conclusive evidence of such fact without proof of the number or proportion of the votes recorded for or against such resolution.
Polls
67 (A) A demand for a poll may be withdrawn only with the approval of the chairman of the meeting. A demand so withdrawn shall not be taken to have invalidated the result of a show of hands on a Procedural Resolution declared before the demand was made.
(B) If a poll is required or demanded, it shall be taken in such manner (including the use of ballot or voting papers or tickets) as the chairman of the meeting may direct, and the result of the poll shall be deemed to be the resolution of the meeting at which the poll was demanded. The chairman of the meeting may (and if so directed by the meeting shall) appoint scrutineers (who need not be members) and may adjourn the meeting to some place and time fixed by him for the purpose of declaring the result of the poll.
(C) A poll demanded on the choice of a chairman of the meeting or on a question of adjournment shall be taken forthwith. A poll required or demanded on any other question shall be taken either immediately or at such subsequent time (not being more than thirty days from the date of the meeting) and place as the chairman of the meeting may direct. No notice need be given of a poll not taken immediately.
(D) A demand for a poll shall not prevent the continuance of the meeting for the transaction of any business other than the question on which the poll has been demanded. The requirement for a poll shall not affect the continuance or conduct of the meeting.
Chairmans powers to promote order and the dispatch of business at meetings
68 (A) The chairman of the meeting shall take such action as he thinks fit to promote the orderly conduct of the business of any general meeting as laid down in the notice of the meeting and to promote the conduct of such business with reasonable despatch, and such chairmans decision, made in good faith, on matters of procedure or arising incidentally from the business of the meeting shall be final as shall his determination, acting in good faith, as to whether any matter is of such a nature.
(B) The chairman of the meeting may in his absolute discretion permit any person to attend and speak at a general meeting who is not otherwise entitled to do so.
20
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Votes of Members
Votes attaching to shares
69 Subject to Articles 56(E) and 72 and to any special rights or restrictions as to voting attached to any class of shares:
(i) on a show of hands every member who is present in person shall have one vote, and every person present who has been duly appointed as a proxy shall have one vote, provided that the proxy shall have one vote for the resolution in question and one vote against it if (a) the proxy has been duly appointed by more than one member entitled to vote on the resolution and (b) the proxy has been instructed by one or more of those members to vote for the resolution and by one or more other of those members to vote against it or is instructed by one or more of those members to vote in one way and is given discretion as to how to vote by one or more others (and wishes to use that discretion to vote in the other way); and
(ii) on a poll every member who is present in person or by proxy shall have two votes for every £5 in nominal amount of the First Preference Shares and Second Preference Shares and one vote for every US$0.25 in nominal amount of all other shares of which he is the holder or in respect of which his appointment as proxy has been made.
Votes by joint shareholders
70 In the case of joint holders of a share the vote of the senior who tenders a vote, whether in person or by proxy, shall be accepted to the exclusion of the votes of the other joint holders and for this purpose seniority shall be determined by the order in which the names stand in the register of members in respect of the share.
Votes of mentally disordered shareholders
71 Where in England or elsewhere a receiver or other person (by whatever name called) has been appointed by any court claiming jurisdiction in that behalf to exercise powers with respect to the property or affairs of any member on the ground (however formulated) of mental disorder, the Directors may in their absolute discretion, upon or subject to production of such evidence of the appointment as the Directors may require, permit such receiver or other person on behalf of such member to vote in person or by proxy at any general meeting or to exercise any other right conferred by membership in relation to meetings of the Company.
Restriction of voting rights etc where calls unpaid
72 No member shall, unless the Directors otherwise determine, be entitled in respect of shares held by him to vote at a general meeting either personally or by proxy or to exercise any other right conferred by membership in relation to meetings of the Company if any call or other sum presently payable by him to the Company in respect of such shares remains unpaid.
Objections to votes
73 No person other than the Company or some person acting on its behalf may raise an objection to the admissibility of any vote except at the meeting or adjourned meeting or subsequent poll at which that vote may be, or is, given or tendered. Any such objection shall be referred to the chairman of the meeting when the objection is raised. The person presiding, or some person appointed by him, shall rule on the objection, and such ruling shall be final and conclusive. If a vote is ruled in order it shall then be valid for all purposes unless previously or subsequently disallowed by the Company.
Voting in person or by proxy
74 On a poll votes may be given either personally or by proxy and a person entitled to more than one vote:
(i) may vote in respect of some of his shares in person and in respect of others of them by proxy; and
(ii) need not use all his votes or cast all the votes he uses (either in person or by proxy) in the same way.
Identity of a proxy
75 A proxy need not be a member of the Company.
Means of appointing proxies: general
76 A proxy shall only be appointed in one of the manners specified in Articles 77 and 78 (as supplemented by Articles 79 and 80), or in accordance with Articles 152, 154 and 158.
Means of appointing proxies: writing
77 (A) A proxy may be appointed by an instrument in writing in any usual or common form, or in any other written form which the Directors may approve, and:
(i) in the case of an appointor who is a natural person shall be signed by the appointor or his agent lawfully authorised in writing; and
(ii) in the case of an appointor which is a corporation shall be either given under its common seal or signed on its behalf by an agent lawfully authorised in writing or by a duly authorised officer of the corporation.
21
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
The signature on such an instrument appointing a proxy need not be witnessed.
(B) Such an instrument appointing a proxy must be left at such place or one of such places (if any) as may be specified for the purpose in or by way of note to or in any document accompanying the notice convening the meeting (or, if no place is so specified, at the Transfer Office) not less than forty-eight hours (or such shorter time as the Directors may determine) before the time appointed for the commencement of the meeting or adjourned meeting (or, in the case of a poll taken otherwise than at or on the same day as the meeting or adjourned meeting, not less than twenty-four hours (or such shorter time as the Directors may determine) before the time appointed for the taking of the poll) at which it is to be used, and in default shall not be treated as valid. Calculation of any such forty-eight hour or twenty-four hour period shall take no account of any part of a day that is not a working day.
(C) Where an instrument appointing a proxy is signed on behalf of the appointor by an agent lawfully authorised in writing:
(i) the Company may treat the appointment as sufficient evidence of that persons authority to execute the appointment of proxy on behalf of that member; and
(ii) the authority under which the agent is appointed or a duly certified copy thereof must (failing previous registration with the Company) be lodged with the instrument of proxy in the manner directed in paragraph (B) above, failing which (in any respect) the instrument may be treated as invalid.
Means of appointing proxies: electronic communications
78 (A) A proxy may be appointed by electronic communication to such address as may be notified by or on behalf of the Company for that purpose, or by any other lawful means from time to time authorised by the Directors. Any means of appointing a proxy which is authorised by or under this paragraph shall be subject to any terms, limitations, conditions or restrictions that the Directors may from time to time prescribe.
(B) An appointment of a proxy by electronic communication where an address has been specified for the purpose of receiving appointments by electronic communication:
(i) in the notice convening the meeting; or
(ii) in any instrument of proxy sent out by the Company in relation to the meeting; or
(iii) in any invitation contained in an electronic communication to appoint a proxy issued by the Company in relation to the meeting,
must be received at such address not less than forty-eight hours (or such shorter time as the Directors may determine) before the time appointed for the commencement of the meeting or adjourned meeting (or, in the case of a poll taken otherwise than at or on the same day as the meeting or adjourned meeting, not less than twenty-four hours (or such shorter time as the Directors may determine) before the time appointed for the taking of the poll) at which it is to be used, and in default shall not be treated as valid. Calculation of any such forty-eight hour or twenty-four hour period shall take no account of any part of a day that is not a working day.
(C) Without limiting the foregoing provisions of this Article 78, in relation to any shares which are uncertificated shares, the Directors may from time to time permit appointments of a proxy to be made by means of an electronic communication in the form of an Uncertificated Proxy Instruction, (that is, a properly authenticated dematerialised instruction, and/or other instruction or notification, which is sent by means of the relevant system concerned and received by such participant in that system acting on behalf of the Company as the Directors may prescribe, in such form and subject to such terms and conditions as may from time to time be prescribed by the Directors (subject always to the facilities and requirements of the relevant system concerned)); and may in a similar manner permit supplements to, or amendments or revocations of, any such Uncertificated Proxy Instruction to be made by like means. The Directors may in addition prescribe the method of determining the time at which any such properly authenticated dematerialised instruction (and/or other instruction or notification) is to be treated as received by the company or such participant. The Directors may treat any such Uncertificated Proxy Instruction which purports to be or is expressed to be sent on behalf of a holder of a share as sufficient evidence of the authority of the person sending that instruction to send it on behalf of that holder.
22
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Directors powers to establish procedures in connection with proxies
79 From time to time the Directors may (consistently with the Companies Acts and these Articles in their absolute discretion) make such regulations and establish such procedures as they consider appropriate in relation to proxies, including in relation to verifying the appointment or revocation of a proxy. Any such regulations may be general, or specific to a particular meeting. Without limitation, any such regulations may include provisions that the Directors (or some person or persons appointed by them) may conclusively determine any matter or dispute relating:
(i) to the appointment or revocation, or purported appointment or revocation, of a proxy; and/or
(ii) to any instruction contained or allegedly contained in any such appointment,
and any such regulations may also include rebuttable or conclusive presumptions of any fact concerning those matters. The Directors may from time to time modify or revoke any such regulations as they think fit, provided that no subsisting valid appointment or revocation of a proxy or any vote instruction shall thereby be rendered invalid.
Validity of proxies
80 (A) Unless the contrary is stated therein, the appointment of a proxy shall be valid for any adjournment of the meeting or meetings to which it relates, and for any poll arising from any such meeting or adjourned meeting.
(B) The valid appointment of a proxy relating to more than one meeting (including any adjournment thereof), having once been so delivered for the purposes of any meeting, shall not have to be re-lodged or otherwise re-registered with the Company for the purposes of any subsequent meeting to which it relates.
(C) A validly appointed proxy shall have the right to demand or join in demanding a poll and the right to speak at a meeting.
(D) Notice of the revocation of the appointment of a proxy may be given in any lawful manner which complies with all (if any) regulations for the time being in force that the Directors have made to govern how a proxy is validly revoked. Nevertheless, a vote cast by proxy shall not be invalidated by the previous death or insanity of any appointor, or by the revocation of the appointment of the proxy or of the authority under which the appointment was made, unless notice (in writing or by electronic communication) of such death, insanity or revocation shall have been received by the Company at such place or one of such places (if any) as may be specified for the purpose in any notice convening the meeting or in any material accompanying the notice convening the meeting (or, if no place is so specified, at the Transfer Office) at least forty-eight hours (or such shorter time as the Directors may determine) before the time appointed for the commencement of the meeting or adjourned meeting (or, in the case of a poll taken otherwise than at or on the same day as the meeting or adjourned meeting, not less than twenty-four hours (or such shorter time as the Directors may determine) before the time appointed for the taking of the poll) at which the vote is cast. Calculation of any such forty-eight hour or twenty-four hour period shall take no account of any part of a day that is not a working day.
Limitation of liabilities in connection with proxies and corporate representatives
81 (A) To the extent permitted by law, each of the Directors, the Secretary and each person employed or, directly or indirectly, retained or used by the Company in the processes of receiving and validating the appointment and revocation of proxies shall not be liable to any persons other than the Company in respect of any acts or omissions (including negligence) occurring in the execution or purported execution of his tasks relating to such processes, provided that he shall have no such immunity in respect of any act done or omitted to be done in bad faith.
(B) The Company shall not be bound to enquire whether any proxy or corporate representative votes in accordance with the instructions given to him by the member he represents and if a proxy or corporate representative does not vote in accordance with the instructions of the member he represents the vote or votes cast shall nevertheless be valid for all purposes.
Corporations acting by representatives
82 (A) Subject to the provisions of the Companies Acts, any corporation (other than the Company itself) which is a member of the Company may, by resolution of its directors or other governing body, authorise a person or persons to act as its representative or representatives at any meeting of the Company, or at any separate meeting of the holders of any class of shares. The corporation shall for the purposes of these Articles be deemed to be present in person at any such meeting if a person or persons so authorised is present at it, and all references to attendance and voting in person shall be construed accordingly. The Company may require such person or persons to produce a certified copy of the resolution before permitting him to exercise his powers.
23
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(B) A vote given or poll demanded by a corporate representative shall be valid notwithstanding that he is no longer authorised to represent the member unless notice of the revocation of appointment was delivered in writing to the Company at such place or address and by such time as is specified in Article 80 for the revocation of the appointment of a proxy.
Disclosure of Interests in Shares
83 (A) If any member, or any other person appearing to be interested in shares held by such member, has been duly served with a notice under Section 793 of the Companies Act 2006 and is in default for the Designated Period in supplying the Company with the information thereby required, then the Directors may in their absolute discretion at any time thereafter by notice (a Direction Notice) to such member direct that in respect of the shares in relation to which the default occurred (the Default Shares) the member shall not (for so long as the default continues) nor shall any transferee to whom any of such shares are transferred (other than pursuant to an Approved Transfer or pursuant to Article 83(C) below) be entitled to vote either personally or by proxy at a general meeting of the Company or a meeting of the holders of any class of shares of the Company or to exercise any other right to attend or vote at general meetings of the Company or meetings of the holders of any class of shares of the Company.
(B) The Company shall send to each other person appearing to be interested in the shares the subject of any Direction Notice a copy of the said notice, but the failure or omission by the Company to do so shall not invalidate such Direction Notice.
(C) Where the Default Shares represent at least 0.25 per cent. of the issued shares of that class, then the Directors may in their absolute discretion include the following additional direction in the Direction Notice:
(i) that any cash dividend or other such money, or shares issued in lieu of a dividend, which would otherwise be due in respect of each of the Default Shares shall (in whole or any part thereof) be retained (or, as the case may be, not issued) by the Company without any liability to pay interest thereon when such dividend or other money or shares is finally paid or issued to the member; and/or
(ii) that no transfer of any of the shares held by such member shall be registered unless:
(a) the member is not himself in default as regards supplying the information required and the transfer is of part only of the members holding and when presented for registration is accompanied by a certificate by the member in a form satisfactory to the Directors to the effect that after due and careful enquiry the member is satisfied that no person in default as regards supplying such information is interested in any of the shares the subject of the transfer; or
(b) the transfer is an Approved Transfer; and
(iii) for the purposes of sub-paragraph (C)(ii) of this Article 83, in the case of shares held by the member in uncertificated form, the Directors may, to enable the Company to deal with the shares in accordance with the provisions of this Article, require the Operator of a relevant system to convert the shares into certificated form.
(D) Where the sanctions under paragraph (A) of this Article 83 apply in relation to any Default Shares, they shall cease to have effect at the end of the period of seven days (or such shorter period as the Directors may determine) following the earlier of:
(i) receipt by the Company of the information required by the notice under Section 793 of the Companies Act 2006; and
(ii) receipt by the Company of notice that the Default Shares have been transferred by means of an Approved Transfer.
(E) The Directors may suspend or cancel any of the sanctions under this Article 83 at any time in relation to any shares.
(F) Any new shares in the Company issued in right of the Default Shares shall be subject to the same sanctions as apply to the Default Shares, and the Directors may make any right to an allotment of the new shares subject to sanctions corresponding to those which will apply to those shares on issue, provided that:
24
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(i) any sanctions applying to, or to a right to, new shares by virtue of this paragraph shall cease to have effect when the sanctions applying to the related Default Shares cease to have effect (and shall be suspended or cancelled if and to the extent that the sanctions applying to the related default shares are suspended or cancelled); and
(ii) paragraph (A) of this Article 83 shall apply to the exclusion of this paragraph (F) if the Company gives a separate Direction Notice in relation to the new shares.
(G) Where any person appearing to be interested in the Default Shares has been duly served with a Direction Notice and the Default Shares which are the subject of such Direction Notice are held by an Approved Depositary, the provisions of this Article 83 shall be treated as applying only to such Default Shares held by the Approved Depositary and not (insofar as such persons apparent interest is concerned) to any other shares held by the Approved Depositary.
(H) Where the member on which a notice under Section 793 of the Companies Act 2006 is served is an Approved Depositary acting in its capacity as such, the obligations of the Approved Depositary as a member of the Company shall be limited to disclosing to the Company such information relating to any person appearing to be interested in the shares held by it as has been recorded by it pursuant to the arrangements entered into by the Company or approved by the Directors pursuant to which it was appointed as an Approved Depositary.
(I) Any Direction Notice shall have effect in accordance with its terms for so long as the default in respect of which the Direction Notice was issued continues and (unless the Directors otherwise determine) for a period of one week thereafter but shall cease to have effect in relation to any Default Shares which are transferred by such member by means of an Approved Transfer. The Directors may at any time give notice cancelling a Direction Notice.
(J) For the purpose of this Article 83:
(i) a person shall be treated as appearing to be interested in any shares if the member holding such shares has given to the Company a notification under the said Section 793 which either (a) names such person as being so interested or (b) fails to establish the identities of those interested in the shares and (after taking into account the said notification and any other relevant Section 793 notification) the Company knows or has reasonable cause to believe or suspects on reasonable grounds that the person in question is or may be interested in the shares;
(ii) reference to a person being in default for the Designated Period in supplying to the Company the information required by a notification under the said Section 793, includes:
(a) reference to his having failed or refused to give all or any part of it;
(b) reference to his having given any information which he knows to be false in a material particular or having recklessly given information which is false in a material particular; and
(c) reference to the Company knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that any of the information provided is false or materially incorrect or incomplete;
(iii) the Designated Period is fourteen days from the date of service of the notice under the said Section 793; and
(iv) a transfer of shares is an Approved Transfer if but only if:
(a) it is a transfer of shares to an offeror by way or in pursuance of acceptance of a take-over offer for a company (as defined in Section 974 of the Companies Act 2006); or
(b) the Directors are satisfied that the transfer is made pursuant to a sale of the whole of the beneficial ownership of the shares to a party unconnected with the member and with other persons appearing to be interested in such shares; or
(c) the transfer results from a sale made through a Recognised Investment Exchange.
(K) Nothing contained in this Article 83 shall limit the power of the Directors under the Companies Act 2006.
25
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Directors
Number of Directors
84 (A) Subject as hereinafter provided, the number of Directors shall not be less than three nor more than twenty-two (or such lesser maximum as the Directors may from time to time resolve).
(B) The Company may by ordinary resolution from time to time vary the minimum number and/or maximum number of Directors.
No qualification shares
85 A Director shall not be required to hold any shares of the Company by way of qualification. A Director who is not a member of the Company shall nevertheless be entitled to attend and speak at general meetings and at any separate meeting of the holders of shares of a particular class.
Directors remuneration
86 The remuneration payable to the Directors for their services in such capacity shall be determined from time to time by ordinary resolution of the Company. Such amount shall be divided among the Directors as they may agree unless the resolution provides otherwise. The amount of remuneration so determined will include remuneration for serving as Chairman and serving on committees of Directors but will not include remuneration of Directors for performing an executive office of the Company.
Directors expenses and pensions
87 (A) The Company may pay on behalf of any Director, or reimburse him in respect of, all such reasonable expenses incurred by him in connection with:
(i) their attendance at meetings of the Directors or of committees of the Directors or general meetings or separate meetings of the holders of any class of shares or of debentures of the Company; and
(ii) any activities undertaken in or about the business of the Company or in connection with the attendance of any spouse or partner of his on any occasion where such spouse or partner accompanies a Director for the purpose of advancing the business or interests of the Company.
(B) The Directors shall have power to pay and agree to pay pensions or other retirement, superannuation, death or disability benefits to (or to any person in respect of) any Director or ex-Director and for the purpose of providing any such pensions or other benefits to contribute to any scheme or fund or to pay premiums.
Directors interests in contracts etc
88 (A) A Director may be in any way, directly or indirectly, interested in any contract or arrangement or transaction with the Company and he may hold and be remunerated in respect of any office, employment or position (other than the office of auditor of the Company or any subsidiary thereof) in relation to the Company or any body corporate in which the Company is in any way interested and he (or any firm of which he is a member) may act in a professional capacity for the Company or any such body corporate and be remunerated therefor and in any such case as aforesaid, save as otherwise agreed, he may retain for his own absolute use and benefit all profits and advantages accruing to him thereunder or in consequence thereof.
(B) The Company shall have no claim arising from, or in consequence of, the Directors interest in any contract or arrangement or transaction or from any office, employment or position within the scope of this Article 88, the Director shall not breach any of his duties to the Company as a result of having that interest and no such contract, arrangement or transaction shall be liable to be avoided on the ground of any such interest or benefit.
Directors powers to authorise conflicts of interest
89 (A) The Directors may (subject to such terms and conditions, if any, as they may think fit to impose from time to time, and subject always to their right to vary or terminate such authorisation) authorise, to the fullest extent permitted by law:
(i) any matter which would otherwise result in a Director infringing his duty to avoid a situation in which he has, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict, with the interests of the Company and which may reasonably be regarded as likely to give rise to a conflict of interest (including a conflict of interest and duty or conflict of duties);
26
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(ii) a Director to accept or continue in any office, employment or position in addition to his office as a Director of the Company and without prejudice to the generality of sub-paragraph (A)(i) of this Article 89 may authorise the manner in which a conflict of interest arising out of such office, employment or position may be dealt with, either before or at the time that such a conflict of interest arises,
provided that for this purpose the Director in question and any other interested Director are not counted in the quorum at any board meeting at which such matter, or such office, employment or position, is approved and it is agreed to without their voting or would have been agreed to if their votes had not been counted.
(B) A Director shall not, by reason of his office, be accountable to the Company for any benefit which he derives from any matter, or from any office, employment or position, which has been approved by the Directors pursuant to this Article 89 (subject in any such case to any limits or conditions to which such approval was subject).
(C) This Article is without prejudice to the operation of Article 88.
Directors conflicts and disclosure of information
90 If a matter, or office, employment or position, has been authorised by the Directors in accordance with Article 89 (subject to such terms and conditions, if any, as the Directors may think fit to impose from time to time, and subject always to their right to vary or terminate such authorisation) or if any matter, or office, employment or position set out in Article 88 applies in relation to a Director then:
(i) the Director shall not be required to disclose any confidential information relating to such matter, or such office, employment or position, to the Company if to make such a disclosure would result in a breach of a duty or obligation of confidence owed by him in relation to or in connection with that matter, or that office, employment or position;
(ii) the Director may absent himself from meetings of the Directors at which anything relating to that matter, or that office, employment or position, will or may be discussed; and
(iii) the Director may make such arrangements as such Director thinks fit for Board and committee papers to be received and read by a professional adviser on behalf of that Director.
Offices held by Directors
91 (A) The Directors may from time to time appoint one or more of their body to be the holder of any executive office on such terms (including such terms as to remuneration by way of salary, commission or otherwise) and for such period as they may (subject to the provisions of the Companies Acts) determine and, without prejudice to the terms of any contract entered into in any particular case, may at any time revoke any such appointment.
(B) The appointment of any Director to the office of chairman of the Company (Chairman) shall automatically determine if he ceases to be a Director but without prejudice to any claim for damages for breach of any contract of service between him and the Company.
(C) The appointment of any Director to an executive office shall not automatically determine if he ceases from any cause to be a Director, unless the contract or resolution under which he holds office shall expressly state otherwise, in which event such determination shall be without prejudice to any claim for damages for breach of any contract of service between him and the Company.
Delegation to executives
92 The Directors may entrust to and confer upon any Director holding any executive office any of the powers exercisable by them as Directors, upon such terms and conditions and with such restrictions as they think fit, and either collaterally with or to the exclusion of their own powers, and the Directors may from time to time revoke, withdraw, alter or vary all or any of such powers.
Appointment and Retirement of Directors
Vacation of office by a Director
93 The office of a Director shall be vacated in any of the following events, namely:
(i) if he shall become prohibited by law from acting as a Director;
27
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(ii) if he shall resign in writing left at the Office or if he shall in writing offer to resign and the Directors shall resolve to accept such offer;
(iii) if he shall have a receiving order made against him or shall compound with his creditors generally; or
(iv) if he is absent without permission of the Directors from any meetings of the Directors held during a continuous period of six months or more and a notice in writing is served upon him personally, or at his residential address provided to the Company for the purposes of section 165 of the Companies Act 2006, signed by all the other Directors stating that he shall cease to be a Director with immediate effect (and such notice may consist of several copies each signed by one or more Directors).
Annual retirement of Directors
94 At the end of each annual general meeting held after the adoption of these Articles all the Directors shall retire from office unless elected or re-elected at the meeting.
Eligibility for re-appointment
95 A retiring Director shall be eligible for re-election. No person other than a Director retiring at the meeting shall, unless recommended by the Directors for election, be eligible for appointment as a Director at any general meeting unless not less than seven nor more than forty-two days (inclusive of the date on which the notice is given) before the date appointed for the meeting there shall have been lodged at the Office notice in writing signed by some member (other than the person to be proposed) duly qualified to attend and vote at the meeting for which such notice is given of his intention to propose such person for election and also notice in writing signed by the person to be proposed of his willingness to be elected.
Appointment and re-appointment of Directors
96 The Company at the meeting at which a Director retires under any provision of these Articles may by ordinary resolution fill the office being vacated by electing thereto the retiring Director or some other person eligible for appointment. In default the retiring Director shall be deemed to have been re-elected except in any of the following cases:
(i) where at such meeting it is expressly resolved not to fill such office or a resolution for the re-election of such Director is put to the meeting and lost;
(ii) where such Director has given notice in writing to the Company that he is unwilling to be re-elected; or
(iii) where the default is due to the moving of a resolution in contravention of the next following Article 97.
The retirement shall not have effect until the conclusion of the meeting except where a resolution is passed to elect some other person in the place of the retiring Director or a resolution for his re-election is put to the meeting and lost and accordingly a retiring Director who is re-elected or deemed to have been re-elected will continue in office without a break.
Form of resolutions to appoint Directors
97 A resolution for the appointment of two or more persons as Directors by a single resolution shall not be moved at any general meeting unless a resolution that it shall be so moved has first been agreed to by the meeting without any vote being given against it; and any resolution moved in contravention of this provision shall be void.
Removal of Directors
98 In addition to any power of removal under the Companies Acts, the Company may, by special resolution, remove a Director before the expiration of his period of office and, subject to these Articles, may, by ordinary resolution, appoint another person who is willing to act as a Director, and is permitted by law to do so, to be a Director instead of him.
Casual vacancies
99 The Company may by ordinary resolution appoint any person, who is willing to act as a Director and permitted by law to act as a Director, to be a Director either to fill a casual vacancy or as an additional Director. Without prejudice thereto the Directors shall also have power at any time so to do, but so that the total number of Directors shall not thereby exceed the maximum number (if any) fixed by or in accordance with these Articles. Any person so appointed by the Directors shall hold office only until the next general meeting notice of which is first given after his appointment and he shall then be eligible for re-election.
28
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Meetings and Proceedings of Directors
Directors meetings
100 (A) Subject to the provisions of these Articles the Directors may meet together for the despatch of business, adjourn and otherwise regulate their meetings as they think fit.
(B) Subject always to Article 100(A), all or any of the Directors or any committee thereof may participate in a meeting of the Directors or that committee by means of a conference telephone or any communication equipment which allows all persons participating in the meeting to hear each other. Any person so participating shall be deemed to be present in person at the meeting and shall be entitled to vote or be counted in a quorum accordingly. Such a meeting shall be deemed to take place where the largest group of those participating is assembled, or, if there is no such group, where the chairman of the meeting is then present.
Calling Directors meetings
101 At any time any Director may, and the Secretary on the requisition of a Director shall, summon a meeting of the Directors. Any Director may waive notice of any meeting and any such waiver may be retroactive.
Quorum
102 The quorum necessary for the transaction of the business of the Directors may be fixed from time to time by the Directors and unless so fixed at any other number shall be two. A meeting of the Directors at which a quorum is present shall be competent to exercise all powers and discretions for the time being exercisable by the Directors.
Votes
103 Questions arising at any meeting of the Directors shall be determined by a majority of votes. In case of an equality of votes the chairman of the meeting shall have a second or casting vote (unless he is not entitled to vote on the resolution in question).
Votes and Directors interests
104 (A) Save as herein provided, a Director shall not vote in respect of any contract or arrangement or any other transaction or proposal whatsoever in which he has any material interest otherwise than by virtue of his interests in shares or debentures or other securities of or otherwise in or through the Company. A Director shall not be counted in the quorum at a meeting in relation to any resolution or matter on which he is debarred from voting.
(B) Subject to the provisions of the Companies Acts, and subject always to the provisions of Article 89, a Director shall (in the absence of some other material interest than is indicated below) be entitled to vote (and be counted in the quorum) in respect of any resolution concerning any of the following matters, namely:
(i) the giving of any security or indemnity to him in respect of money lent or obligations incurred by him at the request of or for the benefit of the Company or any of its subsidiaries;
(ii) the giving of any security or indemnity to a third party in respect of a debt or obligation of the Company or any of its subsidiary undertakings for which he himself has assumed responsibility in whole or in part under a guarantee or indemnity or by the giving of security;
(iii) any proposal concerning an offer of shares or debentures or other securities of or by the Company or any of its subsidiaries for subscription or purchase in which offer he is or is to be interested as a participant in the underwriting or sub-underwriting thereof;
(iv) any proposal concerning any other company in which he is interested, directly or indirectly and whether as an officer or shareholder or otherwise howsoever, provided that he (together with persons connected with him within the meaning of Section 252 of the Companies Act 2006) is not the holder of or beneficially interested in one per cent. or more of the issued shares of any class of such company (or of any third company through which his interest is derived) or of the voting rights available to members of the relevant company (any such interest being deemed for the purposes of this Article 104 to be a material interest in all circumstances);
(v) any proposal concerning the purchase and/or maintenance of any insurance policy under which he may benefit;
29
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(vi) any proposal concerning the giving to him of any other indemnity which is on substantially the same terms as indemnities given or to be given to all of the other Directors or to the funding by the Company of his expenditure on defending proceedings or the doing by the Company of anything to enable him to avoid incurring such expenditure where all other Directors have been given or are to be given substantially the same arrangements; or
(vii) any proposal concerning an arrangement for the benefit of the employees and Directors or former employees and former directors of the Company or any of its subsidiary undertakings, including but without being limited to a retirement benefits scheme and an employees share scheme, which does not accord to any Director any privilege or advantage not generally accorded to the employees or former employees to whom the arrangement relates.
(C) Where proposals are under consideration concerning the appointment (including fixing or varying the terms of appointment) of two or more Directors to offices or employments with the Company or any body corporate in which the Company is interested, such proposals may be divided and considered in relation to each Director separately and in such case each of the Directors concerned (if not debarred from voting under Article 89 or sub-paragraph (B)(iv) of this Article 104) shall be entitled to vote (and be counted in the quorum) in respect of each resolution except that concerning his own appointment.
(D) If any question shall arise at any time as to the materiality of a Directors interest or as to the entitlement of any Director to vote and such question is not resolved by his voluntarily agreeing to abstain from voting, such question shall be referred to the chairman of the meeting and his ruling in relation to any other Director shall be final and conclusive except in a case where the nature or extent of the interests of such Director has not been fairly disclosed.
(E) The Company may by ordinary resolution suspend or relax the provisions of this Article 104 to any extent or ratify any transaction not duly authorised by reason of a contravention of this Article.
(F) For the purposes of this Article 104:
(i) subject to sub-paragraph (iii) below, an interest of a person who is connected with a Director (within the meaning of Section 252 of the Companies Act 2006) shall be treated as an interest of that Director;
(ii) a general notice given to the Directors that a Director is to be regarded as having an interest of the nature and extent specified in the notice in any transaction or arrangement in which a specified person or class of persons is interested shall be deemed to be a disclosure that the Director has an interest in any such transaction or arrangement of the nature and extent so specified, but not otherwise; and
(iii) an interest of which a Director has no knowledge and of which it is unreasonable to expect him to have knowledge shall not be treated as an interest of his.
Directors acting during vacancies
105 The continuing Directors may act notwithstanding any vacancies, but if and so long as the number of Directors is reduced below the minimum number fixed by or in accordance with these Articles the continuing Directors or Director may act for the purpose of filling such vacancies or of summoning general meetings, but not for any other purpose. If there be no Directors or Director able or willing to act, then any two members may summon a general meeting for the purpose of appointing Directors.
Chairman
106 The Directors may elect from their number a Chairman and determine the period for which he is to hold office. If no Chairman shall have been appointed or if at any meeting of the Directors no Chairman shall be present within five minutes after the time appointed for holding the meeting, the Directors present may choose one of their number to be chairman of the meeting.
Written and e-mail resolutions
107 A resolution in writing agreed to by all the Directors entitled to receive notice of a meeting of the Directors and who would be entitled to vote (and whose vote would have been counted) on the resolution at a meeting of the Directors shall (if that number is sufficient to constitute a quorum) be as valid and effectual as if it had been passed at a meeting of the Directors, duly convened and held. A resolution in writing is adopted when all such Directors have signed one or more copies of it or have otherwise indicated their agreement to it in writing (which shall include, without limitation, e-mails or other electronic communications).
30
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Delegation to persons or committees
108 (A) The Directors may delegate any of their powers or discretions which are conferred on them under these Articles to such person or committee by such means (including by power of attorney), to such an extent in relation to such matters or territories and on such terms and conditions, as they think fit. If the Directors so specify, any such delegation may authorise further delegation of the Directors powers by any person to whom they are delegated. The Directors may revoke any delegation in whole or part, or alter its terms and conditions. The power to delegate under this Article 108 includes power to delegate the determination of any fee, remuneration or other benefit which may be paid or provided to any Director.
(B) References to a committee of the Directors are to a committee established in accordance with these Articles, whether or not comprised wholly of directors. Any committee so formed under this Article 108 shall in the exercise of the powers so delegated conform to such of these Articles as regulate the proceedings of Directors so far as they are capable of applying and so far as the same are not superseded by any regulations made by the Directors under paragraph (C) below.
(C) The Directors may make rules regulating the proceedings of any such committees, which shall prevail over any rules derived from these Articles pursuant to paragraph (B) of this Article 108 if, and to the extent that, they are not consistent with them.
Validity of acts
109 All acts done by any meeting of Directors, or of any such committee, or by any person acting as a Director or as a member of any such committee, shall as regards all persons dealing in good faith with the Company, notwithstanding that there was some defect in the appointment of any of the persons acting as aforesaid, or that any such persons were disqualified or had vacated office, or were not entitled to vote, be as valid as if every such person had been duly appointed and was qualified and had continued to be a Director or member of the committee and had been entitled to vote.
Borrowing Powers
110 (A) Subject as hereinafter provided and to the provisions of the Companies Acts the Directors may exercise all the powers of the Company to borrow money, and to mortgage or charge its undertaking, property and uncalled capital, and to issue debentures and other securities, whether outright or as collateral security for any debt, liability or obligation of the Company or of any third party.
(B) The Directors shall restrict the borrowings of the Company and exercise all voting and other rights or powers of control exercisable by the Company in relation to its subsidiaries incorporated in the United Kingdom so as to secure that the aggregate amount for the time being remaining undischarged of all moneys borrowed by the Company and/or any of its subsidiaries incorporated in the United Kingdom (exclusive of moneys borrowed by the Company from and for the time being owing to any such subsidiary undertaking or by any such subsidiary undertaking from and for the time being owing to the Company or another such subsidiary undertaking) shall not, except with the consent of the Company in general meeting, at any one time exceed two times:
(i) the amount paid up on the share capital of the Company for the time being issued, plus
(ii) the aggregate of the sums for the time being standing to the credit of the capital and revenue reserves (including share premium account and undistributed profits but excluding amounts set aside for taxation) of the Company and its subsidiaries incorporated in the United Kingdom as appearing in the latest audited accounts of those companies.
(C) For the purposes of the said limits:
(i) the issue of debentures shall be deemed to constitute borrowing notwithstanding that the same may be issued in whole or in part for a consideration other than cash;
(ii) moneys borrowed for the purpose of repaying or redeeming (with or without premium) in whole or in part any amounts previously borrowed and then outstanding and intended to be applied for such purpose within six months after the borrowing thereof shall not during such period, except to the extent so applied, themselves be taken into account;
(iii) any amounts borrowed from bankers or others for the purpose of financing any contract up to an amount not exceeding that part of the price receivable under such contract which is guaranteed or insured by the Export Credits Guarantee Department or other like institution carrying on a similar business shall be deemed not to be borrowed moneys;
31
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(iv) borrowed moneys expressed in or calculated by reference to a currency other than sterling shall be translated into sterling by reference to the rate of exchange used for the conversion of such currency in the latest audited balance sheet of the relevant company or, if the relevant currency was not thereby involved, by reference to the rate of exchange or approximate rate of exchange ruling on such date and determined on such basis as the auditors may determine or approve.
(D) No person dealing with the Company or any of its subsidiaries shall be concerned to see or enquire whether the said limit is observed and no debt incurred or security given in excess of such limit shall be invalid or ineffectual unless the lender or the recipient of the security had, at the time when the debt was incurred or security given, express notice that the said limit had been or would thereby be exceeded.
General Powers of Directors
General powers of the Directors
111 The business and affairs of the Company shall be managed by the Directors, who may exercise all such powers of the Company as are not by the Companies Acts or by these Articles required to be exercised by the Company in general meeting, subject nevertheless to any regulations of these Articles, to the provisions of the Companies Acts and to such regulations, being not inconsistent with the aforesaid regulations or provisions, as may be prescribed by special resolution of the Company, but no regulation so made by the Company shall invalidate any prior act of the Directors which would have been valid if such regulation had not been made. The general powers given by this Article 111 shall not be limited or restricted by any special authority or power given to the Directors by any other Article.
Power to change the Companys name
112 The Directors may change the Companys name.
Power to make provision for employees on cessation of business
113 The Directors may, by resolution, sanction the exercise of the power to make provision for the benefit of persons employed or formerly employed by the Company, or any of its subsidiaries, in connection with the cessation or the transfer to any person of the whole or part of the undertaking of the Company or that subsidiary undertaking, but any such resolution shall not be sufficient sanction for payments to or for the benefit of directors, former directors or shadow directors.
Head office
114 The Directors shall ensure that the head office of the Company remains in England at all times.
Attorneys
115 The Directors may from time to time and at any time by power of attorney or otherwise appoint any company, firm or person or any fluctuating body of persons, whether nominated directly or indirectly by the Directors, to be the attorney or attorneys of the Company for such purposes and with such powers, authorities and discretions (not exceeding those vested in or exercisable by the Directors under these Articles) and for such period and subject to such conditions as they may think fit, and any such power of attorney may contain such provisions for the protection and convenience of persons dealing with any such attorney as the Directors may think fit, and may also authorise any such attorney to sub-delegate all or any of the powers, authorities and discretions vested in him.
Branch registers
116 Subject to and to the extent permitted by the Companies Acts, the Company, or the Directors on behalf of the Company, may cause to be kept in any territory a branch register of members resident in such territory, and the Directors may make and vary such regulations as they may think fit respecting the keeping of any such register.
Signature on financial instruments
117 All cheques, promissory notes, drafts, bills of exchange, and other negotiable or transferable instruments, and all receipts for moneys paid to the Company, shall be signed, drawn, accepted, endorsed, or otherwise executed, as the case may be, in such manner as the Directors shall from time to time by resolution determine.
Secretary
118 The Secretary shall be appointed by the Directors on such terms and for such period as they may think fit. Any Secretary so appointed may at any time be removed from office by the Directors, but without prejudice to any claim for damages for breach of any contract of service between him and the Company. If thought fit two or more persons may be appointed as joint secretaries. The Directors may also appoint from time to time on such terms as they may think fit one or more deputy secretaries, assistant secretaries and deputy assistant secretaries. A signature or attestation or certification of or
32
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
on any document by a deputy, assistant or deputy assistant secretary in that capacity shall in favour of any person dealing with the Company on the faith thereof be as effective as if it were the signature or attestation or certification of or on such document by the Secretary.
Authentication of Documents
119 Any Director or the Secretary or any person appointed by the Directors for the purpose shall have power to authenticate any documents affecting the constitution of the Company and any resolutions passed by the Company or the Directors or any committee, and any books, records, documents and accounts relating to the business of the Company, and to certify copies thereof or extracts therefrom as true copies or extracts; and where any books, records, documents or accounts are elsewhere than at the Office the local manager or other officer of the Company having the custody thereof shall be deemed to be a person appointed by the Directors as aforesaid (except as otherwise determined by the Directors). A document purporting to be a copy of a resolution, or an extract from the minutes of a meeting, of the Company or of the Directors or any committee which is certified as aforesaid shall be conclusive evidence in favour of all persons dealing with the Company upon the faith thereof that such resolution has been duly passed or, as the case may be, that any minute so extracted is a true and accurate record of proceedings at a duly constituted meeting.
Reserves
120 (A) After payment of the dividends upon any preference shares of the Company, and of a dividend of 4.2 per cent. upon the Ordinary Shares, there shall be set aside a special reserve fund out of the balance of the profits of each year such sum as the Directors may determine, and no part of the moneys so set aside nor of the interest thereon shall without the sanction of a special resolution of the holders of the preference shares be applied otherwise than for the purpose of making up any deficit of cumulative dividend on the preference shares, or in the event of a reduction of capital or a winding up, for the purpose of repaying to the holders of the preference shares the amounts paid up on such shares together with the ten per cent. referred to in sub-paragraphs (i) and (ii) of paragraph (A) of Article 6 but the same may be used by the Directors as part of the working capital of the Company. All moneys from time to time standing to the credit of the special reserve fund may be invested in or upon such securities or investments as the Directors shall think fit, including the debentures of any company formed or promoted by this Company, or in which this Company shall hold shares.
(B) The Directors may from time to time set aside out of the profits of the Company and carry to a general reserve such further sums as they think proper which, at the absolute discretion of the Directors, shall be applicable for any purpose to which the profits of the Company may properly be applied and pending such application may either be employed in the business of the Company or be invested. The Directors may divide the general reserve into such special funds as they think fit and may consolidate into one fund any special funds or any parts of any special funds into which the general reserve may have been divided. The Directors may also without placing the same to reserve carry forward any profits.
(C) In carrying sums to reserve and in applying the same the Directors shall comply with the provisions of the Companies Acts.
The Seal
General provisions about seals
121 (A) The Directors shall provide for the safe custody of the Seal and any Securities Seal, and neither shall be used without the authority of the Directors or of a committee authorised by the Directors in that behalf.
(B) Affixing any seal of the Company (including the Seal, any Securities Seal and any other seal) to an instrument shall include:
(i) impressing that seal by mechanical means, or printing that seal or a facsimile of it, on the instrument;
(ii) applying that seal or a facsimile of it by any other means to the instrument.
(C) Every instrument to which the Seal shall be affixed shall be signed autographically by one authorised person and a witness, or by one Director and the Secretary, or by two Directors, save that as regards any certificates for shares or debentures or other securities of the Company the Directors may by resolution determine that such signatures, or either of them, shall be dispensed with or affixed by some method or system of mechanical signature. For the purpose of this sub-
33
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
paragraph (C) an authorised person is any Director, or the Secretary, or any person authorised by the Directors for the purpose of signing instruments to which the Seal is affixed.
(D) The Securities Seal shall be used only for sealing securities issued by the Company and documents creating or evidencing securities so issued. Any such securities or documents sealed with the Securities Seal shall not require to be signed.
(E) Where the Companies Acts so permit, any instrument (i) signed by one Director in the presence of a witness who attests the Directors signature, or by one Director and the Secretary, or by two Directors, and (ii) expressed to be executed by the Company, shall have the same effect as if executed under the Seal, provided that no instrument shall be so signed which makes it clear on its face that it is intended by the person or persons making it to have effect as a deed without the authority of the Directors or of a committee or other person authorised by the Directors (either generally or specifically) in that behalf.
Dividends
Powers and rights in respect of dividends
122 (A) The Company may by ordinary resolution declare dividends but no such dividend shall exceed the amount recommended by the Directors.
(B) The Directors may also from time to time declare and pay dividends on shares of any class of such amounts and on such dates and in respect of such periods as they think fit.
(C) Dividends may be declared and paid in any currency or currencies that the Directors shall determine, provided that:
(i) the Directors shall announce a sterling equivalent for any dividend declared in another currency and the date of the intended announcement of such sterling equivalent shall be notified by the Directors when the dividend is declared;
(ii) the sterling equivalent for any dividend declared in another currency shall be determined in accordance with Article 124(C); and
(iii) holders of Ordinary Shares shall be entitled to be paid dividends in sterling.
(D) When declaring a dividend, the Company or the Directors may identify either generally or in relation to any particular group or groups of shareholders the funds from which it is proposed that the dividend will be paid.
Payment of fixed dividends
123 If and so far as in the opinion of the Directors the profits of the Company justify such payments, the Directors may declare and pay the fixed dividends on any class of shares carrying a fixed dividend expressed to be payable on fixed dates on the half-yearly or other dates prescribed for the payment thereof and may also from time to time pay interim dividends on shares of any class of such amounts and on such dates and in respect of such periods as they think fit.
Supplementary rules relating to dividends
124 (A) Unless and to the extent that the rights attached to any shares, the terms of issue thereof or these Articles otherwise provide, all dividends shall (as regards any shares not fully paid throughout the period in respect of which the dividend is paid) be apportioned and paid pro rata according to the amounts paid on the shares during any portion or portions of the period in respect of which the dividend is paid. For the purposes of this Article 124, no amount paid on a share in advance of calls shall be treated as paid on the share.
(B) The Directors may at their absolute discretion make provisions to enable a member and/or an Approved Depositary and/or any Appointed Person to receive dividends duly payable in a currency or currencies other than sterling.
(C) For the purposes of the calculation of the amount receivable in respect of any dividend, the rate of exchange to be used to determine the relevant currency equivalent of any sum payable as a dividend shall be determined by the Directors by reference to such market rate or rates or the mean of such market rates prevailing at such time or times or on such other date or dates, in each case falling before the time of the relevant announcement of the currency equivalent, as the Directors may in their absolute discretion select.
34
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Limitation on dividends
125 No dividend shall be paid otherwise than out of profits available for distribution under the provisions of the Companies Acts.
Acquired profits
126 Subject to the provisions of the Companies Acts, where any asset, business or property is bought by the Company as from a past date the profits and losses thereof as from such date may at the absolute discretion of the Directors in whole or in part be carried to revenue account and treated for all purposes as profits or losses of the Company. Subject as aforesaid, if any shares or securities are purchased cum dividend or interest, such dividend or interest may at the absolute discretion of the Directors be treated as revenue, and it shall not be obligatory to capitalise the same or any part thereof.
No interest on dividends
127 No dividend or other moneys payable on or in respect of a share shall bear interest as against the Company.
Retention of dividends
128 (A) The Directors may retain any dividend or other moneys payable on or in respect of a share on which the Company has a lien and may apply the same in or towards satisfaction of the debts, liabilities or engagements in respect of which the lien exists.
(B) The Directors may retain the dividends payable upon shares in respect of which any person is under the provisions as to the transmission of shares hereinbefore contained entitled to become a member, or which any person is under those provisions entitled to transfer, until such person shall become a member in respect of such shares or shall transfer the same.
Waiver of dividends
129 The waiver in whole or in part of any dividend on any share by any document (whether or not under seal) shall be effective only if such document is signed by the shareholder (or the person entitled to the share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of the holder or otherwise by operation of law) and delivered to the Company and if or to the extent that the same is accepted as such or acted upon by the Company.
Non-cash dividends
130 The Company may upon the recommendation of the Directors by ordinary resolution direct payment of a dividend in whole or in part by the distribution of specific assets (and in particular of paid-up shares or debentures of any other company) and the Directors shall give effect to such resolution.
Payment mechanisms for dividends
131 (A) Any dividend or other money payable in cash (whether in sterling or foreign currency) relating to a share shall be paid to:
(i) the shareholder;
(ii) if the share is held by more than one holder, all joint holders;
(iii) the person or persons becoming entitled to the share by reason of the death or bankruptcy of a holder or otherwise by operation of law; or
(iv) an Approved Depositary,
and such person shall be referred to as the recipient for the purposes of this Article 131 and Article 132.
(B) Any dividend or other money payable in cash (whether in sterling or foreign currency) relating to a share shall be paid by such method as the Directors, in their absolute discretion, shall decide and without limiting any other method of payment which the Company may adopt, the Directors may decide that payment can be made wholly or partly:
(i) by inter-bank transfer, in electronic form, by electronic means or by such other means approved by the Directors to be paid directly to an account (of a type approved by the Directors) nominated (in some manner authorised by the Directors) by the recipient (or joint recipients in the case of joint holders, or in the case of an Approved Depositary, and subject to the approval of the Directors, to be paid to such account or accounts as the Approved Depositary may direct);
35
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(ii) by cheque or warrant or any other similar financial instrument sent either (i) to the registered address of the recipient, or (ii) in the case of joint recipients, to any one of such recipients, or (iii) or to such person and such postal address as the recipient or recipients in (i) or (ii), as applicable, may in writing direct, or (iv) in the case of an Approved Depositary, and subject to the approval of the Directors, to such persons and postal addresses as the Approved Depositary may direct; or
(iii) in respect of any share which is an uncertificated share in such manner as the Company shall from time to time consider sufficient, by means of the relevant system concerned (subject always to the facilities and requirements of that relevant system), and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing, such payment may include the sending by the Company or by any person on its behalf of an instruction to the Operator of the system to credit the cash memorandum account of the recipient (or joint recipients in the case of joint holders), provided that every such payment to be made by means of that relevant system shall be made in such manner as may be consistent with the facilities and requirements of the system.
(C) In respect of the payment of any dividend or other money payable in cash (whether in sterling or foreign currency) relating to a share, the Directors may decide, and notify recipients, that:
(i) one or more methods of payment will be used and a recipient may elect to receive the payment by one of the means so notified in the manner prescribed by the Directors;
(ii) one or more methods of payment will be used unless a recipient elects otherwise in the manner prescribed by the Directors; or
(iii) one or more methods of payment will be used and that recipients will not be able to elect otherwise.
(D) The Directors may for this purpose decide that different methods of payment may apply to different recipients or groups of recipients (such as an Approved Depositary or overseas members).
(E) Payment in any way whatsoever is made at the risk of recipient. The Company will not be responsible for a payment which is lost or delayed. The Company is treated as having made a payment and received a good discharge for it if a payment using electronic or other means approved by the Directors is made in accordance with instructions given by the Company, or if the cheque or warrant or other similar financial instrument in question is paid by the banker or other person upon whom it is drawn.
(F) If the Directors decide that a payment or payments will be made by cheque or warrant or any other similar financial instrument pursuant to this Article 131, then every such cheque, warrant or instrument shall be made payable to, or to the order of, the recipient to whom it is sent, or to such person as the recipient may direct. If any such cheque, warrant or instrument has or shall be alleged to have been lost, stolen or destroyed, the Directors may, on request of the recipient or person entitled thereto, issue a replacement subject to compliance with such conditions as to evidence and indemnity and the payment of out of pocket expenses of the Company in connection with the request as the Directors may think fit.
(G) Where an Approved Depositary approved by the Directors for the purposes of this Article 131 has elected or agreed pursuant to provision made under these Articles to receive dividends in a foreign currency, the Directors may in their absolute discretion approve the entering into of arrangements with such Approved Depositary to enable payment of the dividend to be made to such Approved Depositary in such foreign currency for value on the date on which the relevant dividend is paid, or such later date as the Directors may determine.
Right to cease sending payment and unclaimed payments
132 (A) If:
(i) on three consecutive occasions a cheque or warrant or any other similar financial instrument, or other method of payment, in payment of dividends or other moneys payable on or in respect of any share have been sent in accordance with the provisions of Article 131 but have been returned undelivered or left uncashed, or the other method of payment has failed; or
(ii) a recipient does not specify an address, or does not specify an account of a type prescribed by the Directors, or other details necessary in order to make a payment of a dividend or other moneys payable on or in respect of any share by the means by which the Directors have decided in accordance with Article 131 that a payment is to be made, or by which the recipient has elected to receive payment, and such address or details are necessary in order for the Company to make the relevant payment in accordance with such decision or election,
36
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
the Company need not thereafter despatch further cheques or warrants or instruments, or use any other method of payment, in payment of dividends or other moneys payable on or in respect of the share in question until the recipient or other person entitled thereto shall have communicated with the Company and supplied in writing to the Transfer Office a postal address or account details to enable the relevant method of payment (prescribed by the Directors in accordance with Article 131) to be used.
(B) If a payment made or attempted pursuant to Article 131 is unsuccessful or if the relevant method of payment (prescribed by the Directors in accordance with Article 131) cannot be used due to any of the circumstances referred to in Article 132(A)(ii), the Company may transfer the amount then due from it into an account of the Company. Any amount so transferred is to be treated as having been duly paid to its originally intended recipient or recipients at the time it is credited to the account in question of the Company. The Company shall then hold such amount in that account until whichever is the first to occur of the following, namely until:
(i) the amount in question is claimed by the person or persons duly entitled to it, upon which the Company shall pay the amount to that person or persons;
(ii) valid account details to enable the relevant method of payment (prescribed by the Directors in accordance with Article 131) to be used are duly nominated for receipt of the amount in question, upon which nomination the Company shall pay that amount into the nominated account;
(iii) twelve years have passed since the Company paid the amount into its own account as permitted by this Article 132, at which time the amount in question shall be forfeited, the Company shall be freed from any obligation to pay the amount and the Company shall not be obliged to account to, or be liable in any respect to, the recipient or person who would have been entitled to the amount; or
(iv) pursuant to the authority in Article 47, the Company sells the share to which the amount in question relates and two years have passed following the sale of the share, at which time the amount in question shall be forfeited (and any dividends or other moneys payable on or in respect of the share which have arisen during the two years following the sale of the share will also be forfeited) and the Company shall be freed from any obligation to pay the amount and the Company shall not be obliged to account to such former member or other previously entitled person for, or be liable to such persons in relation to, the amount.
(C) The Company shall not be a trustee of any monies held by it pursuant to Article 132(B), and no interest shall accrue on any such monies.
Payment of dividends to joint shareholder
133 If two or more persons are registered as joint holders of any share, or are entitled jointly to a share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of the holder or otherwise by operation of law, any one of them may give effectual receipts for any dividend or other moneys payable or property distributable on or in respect of the share.
Dividend re-investment plans and scrip dividend programme
134 (A) The Directors may, with the prior sanction of an ordinary resolution of the Company and in accordance with the terms and conditions of such resolution but otherwise as the Directors may determine from time to time, offer, implement and maintain a share dividend or a distribution reinvestment plan or plans or a scrip dividend programme for the benefit of the holders of Ordinary Shares of the Company whereby such holders may be given one or more of the following options namely:
(i) instead of taking the net cash amount due to them in respect of any dividend (or any part thereof) declared or payable on all or any Ordinary Shares held by them either to invest such cash in subscribing for Ordinary Shares in the capital of the Company payable in full or by instalments or in paying up in full or by instalments any unpaid or partly paid Ordinary Shares held by them on the terms of any such plan or programme; or
(ii) instead of taking the net cash amount due to them in respect of any dividend (or any part thereof) declared or payable on all or any Ordinary Shares held by them to elect to receive new Ordinary Shares in the capital of the Company credited as fully paid on the terms and conditions of any such plan or programme; or
(iii) to forego their entitlement to any dividend (or any part thereof) declared or payable on all or any Ordinary Shares held by them and to take instead fully paid bonus Ordinary Shares on the terms and conditions of any such plan or programme; or
37
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(iv) any other option in respect of the whole or any part of any dividend on all or any Ordinary Shares held by them as the Directors shall determine.
(B) Where in the case of any plan or programme such as those contemplated in sub-paragraphs (A)(ii) and (A)(iii) above, holders of Ordinary Shares are not entitled to payment of a cash dividend (otherwise than in respect of fractional entitlements), the plan or programme may provide for them to receive allotments of Ordinary Shares credited as fully paid having a value of more than the net cash amount which would otherwise be due to them in respect of the relevant dividend but not exceeding a value equivalent to the sum of the net cash amount of the dividend together with any associated tax credit.
(C) In the case of a scrip dividend programme the Directors may, with the prior sanction of an ordinary resolution of the Company, offer any holders of Ordinary Shares the right to elect to receive an allotment of new Ordinary Shares (Scrip Shares) credited as fully paid in lieu of the whole (or some part to be determined by the Directors) of a dividend specified by the ordinary resolution. The entitlement of each holder of Ordinary Shares to Scrip Shares shall be decided by the Directors and shall be such whole number of Ordinary Shares as have equal value to, or as near as possible to (but not greater than), the cash amount (disregarding any associated tax credit) of the dividend that such holder would have received by way of dividend in the currency in which such dividend was declared. In determining the number of Scrip Shares, the value of an Ordinary Share shall be calculated either: (i) by reference to the average of the US dollar equivalent of the closing mid-price quotations of an Ordinary Share on each of the first five dealing days on which the Ordinary Shares are quoted as being ex the relevant dividend, as such price is derived from the Daily Official List of the London Stock Exchange; or (ii) in such manner as the Directors may determine on such basis as they consider to be fair and reasonable. The cash amount of the relevant dividend in a particular currency shall be converted into the equivalent amount in another currency if and in such manner as the Directors shall so determine. A certificate or report by the Auditors as to the calculation of the relevant value in respect of any dividend shall be conclusive evidence of that amount.
(D) The Directors may not allot Scrip Shares unless so authorised by ordinary resolution. Such a resolution may give authority in relation to particular dividends or may extend to all dividends declared or paid in the period specified in the resolution. Such period may not be longer than the period to (and including) the date of the annual general meeting of the Company held in the third year that commences after the date of the resolution.
(E) If a holder of Ordinary Shares has elected to receive Scrip Shares in place of a dividend, that dividend (or that part of the dividend in respect of which a right of election has been given) shall not be payable on Ordinary Shares in respect of which the share election has been duly exercised and has not been revoked (the Elected Ordinary Shares). In place of such dividend, the following provisions shall apply:
(i) such number of Scrip Shares as are calculated in accordance with Article 134(C) shall be allotted to the holders of the Elected Ordinary Shares;
(ii) unless the CREST Regulations require otherwise, if the Elected Ordinary Shares are in uncertificated form on the record date then the Scrip Shares shall be issued as uncertificated shares;
(iii) if the Elected Ordinary Shares are in certificated form on the record date then the Scrip Shares shall be issued as certificated shares; and
(iv) the Scrip Shares allotted shall rank equally in all respects with the fully paid Ordinary Shares then in issue save only as regards participation in the relevant dividend.
(F) The Directors may in their absolute discretion suspend or terminate or modify in any manner consistent with these Articles or the sanctioning resolution any such plan or programme which is in operation.
(G) For the purposes of any such plan or programme the Directors may capitalise out of such of the sums standing to the credit of any of the Companys reserve accounts (including any share premium account, capital redemption reserve or any other undistributable reserve) or any of the profits available for distribution under the provisions of the Companies Acts and which could otherwise have been applied in paying dividends in cash as the Directors may determine, a sum equal to the aggregate nominal amount of any Ordinary Shares to be allotted under any such plan or programme and shall apply the same in paying up in full the appropriate number of Ordinary Shares for allotment and distribution credited as fully paid up to and amongst the holders of Ordinary Shares entitled to the same. A resolution of the Directors capitalising any part of such reserve account or profits shall have the same effect as if such capitalisation had been declared by ordinary resolution of the Company in accordance with Article 136 and the Directors may, in relation to any such capitalisation, exercise all of the
38
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
powers conferred on them by Article 136 without an ordinary resolution. The Directors may do all acts and things considered necessary or expedient to give effect to any such capitalisation and may authorise any person on behalf of all the holders of Ordinary Shares entitled to the same to enter into an agreement with the Company providing for any such capitalisation and matters incidental thereto and any agreement made under such authority shall be effective and binding on all concerned.
(H) No fraction of any share shall be allotted. The Directors may make such provisions as they think fit for any fractional entitlements including provisions whereby, in whole or in part, the benefit thereof accrues to the Company and/or under which fractional entitlements are accrued and/or retained and in each case accumulated on behalf of any shareholder and such accruals or retentions are applied to the allotment (by reference to the aggregate net cash amount thereof or value equivalent to the sum of the aggregate net cash amount thereof together with any associated tax credit which it would have attracted if paid as a dividend) by way of inclusion in the calculation of the number of Scrip Shares or bonus to or a cash subscription on behalf of such shareholder of fully paid Ordinary Shares.
(I) The Directors shall notify the holders of Ordinary Shares of the terms and conditions of any such plan or programme and shall make available or provide to them forms of election so that they may exercise the rights granted.
(J) The power conferred under this Article 134 and by any authority given by the shareholders shall not be exercised unless:
(i) the Company and the Directors shall have all (if any) other necessary powers and authorities to issue sufficient Ordinary Shares; and
(ii) if any shares are to be allotted other than for cash, the Company shall then have sufficient profits available for distribution or reserves standing to the credit of an appropriate account to give effect to the terms of any such plan.
(K) In relation to any particular proposed dividend, the Directors may in their absolute discretion resolve and shall so resolve if the Company has insufficient reserves or otherwise does not have the necessary authorities or approvals to issue new Ordinary Shares:
(i) that shareholders shall not be entitled to make any election to receive shares in place of a cash dividend and that any election previously made shall not extend to such dividend; or
(ii) at any time prior to the allotment of the Ordinary Shares which would otherwise be allotted in lieu of that dividend, that all elections to take shares shall be treated as not applying to that dividend,
and if so, the dividend shall be paid in cash as if no elections had been made in respect of it.
(L) The Directors may in their absolute discretion on any occasion determine that any such plan or programme shall not be made available to Ordinary Shareholders resident within or beyond specified territories or jurisdictions or in respect of Ordinary Shares held by an Approved Depositary or in respect of Ordinary Shares the dividends on which are payable or liable to be payable in a currency other than US dollars or sterling pursuant to provision made under these Articles.
Record Date
135 (A) Notwithstanding any other provision of these Articles, but subject always to the Companies Acts and the Uncertificated Securities Regulations 2001, the Company or the Directors may by resolution specify any date (record date) as the date at the close of business (or such other time as the Directors may determine) on which persons registered as the holders of shares or other securities shall be entitled to receipt of any dividend, distribution, interest, allotment, issue, notice, information, document or circular and such record date may be on or at any time before the date on which the same is paid or made or (in the case of any dividend, distribution, interest, allotment or issue) at any time after the same is recommended, resolved, declared or announced but without prejudice to the rights inter se in respect of the same of transferors and transferees of any such shares or other securities.
(B) Subject to the provisions of these Articles, every person who becomes entitled to a share shall be bound by any notice in respect of that share which, before his name is entered in the register of members, has been given to the person from whom he derives his title.
39
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Capitalisation of Profits and Reserves
136 The Directors may, with the sanction of an ordinary resolution of the Company, capitalise any sum standing to the credit of any of the Companys reserve accounts (including any share premium account, capital redemption reserve or other undistributable reserve) or any sum standing to the credit of profit and loss account that is not required for the payment of preferential dividend by appropriating such sum to the members who would have been entitled to it if it were distributed by way of dividend on the Ordinary Shares and in the same proportions and applying such sum on their behalf in paying up in full Ordinary Shares (or, subject to any special rights previously conferred on any shares or class of shares for the time being issued, shares of any other class not being redeemable shares) for allotment and distribution credited as fully paid up to and amongst them as bonus shares in the proportions aforesaid. The Directors may do all acts and things considered necessary or expedient to give effect to any such capitalisation, with full power to the Directors to make such provisions as they think fit for any fractional entitlements which would arise on the basis aforesaid (including provisions as to the date or dates by reference to which the entitlement of such members is to be determined and provisions whereby fractional entitlements are disregarded or the benefit thereof accrues to the Company rather than to the members concerned). The Directors may authorise any person to enter on behalf of all the members interested into an agreement with the Company providing for any such capitalisation and matters incidental thereto and any agreement made under such authority shall be effective and binding on all concerned.
Notices
Service of notices and documents
137 (A) Any notice or document (including a share certificate) may be served on or delivered to any member by the Company either:
(i) by sending it through the post in a prepaid cover (in such form as any Director or the Secretary may determine) addressed to such member at his registered address, or (if he has no registered address within the United Kingdom) to the postal address, if any, within the United Kingdom supplied by him to the Company as his address for the service of notices, or by delivering it to such address addressed as aforesaid. In the case of a member registered on a branch register any such notice or document may be posted either in the United Kingdom or in the territory in which such branch register is maintained; or
(ii) by hand, that is by any person (including a courier or process server) handing it to the member or leaving it at the members registered address or postal address referred to in sub-paragraph (A)(i) above.
(B) Any notice or document (including a share certificate) sent or supplied to any member by the Company:
(i) by post, service or delivery, shall be deemed to be received at the expiration of twenty-four hours (or, where second-class mail is employed, forty-eight hours) after the time when the cover containing the same is posted and in proving such service or delivery it shall be sufficient to prove that such cover was properly addressed, stamped and posted; and
(ii) by hand, shall be deemed to have been received on the day it was handed to the member or left at the members registered address or postal address referred to in sub-paragraph (A)(i) above.
(C) The Company is generally and unconditionally authorised to use electronic communications with its shareholders and in particular to send or supply documents or information to its shareholders by making them available on a website. Accordingly, the Company may, subject to the provisions of the Companies Acts, give or send to any members any notice or other document (excluding a share certificate) by electronic communication where:
(i) the Company and that member have agreed to the use of electronic communication for sending copies of documents to the member and:
(a) the documents are documents to which the agreement applies; and
(b) copies of the documents are sent using electronic communication to such address (or to one of such addresses if more than one) as may for the time being be notified by the member to the Company for that purpose; or
(ii) the Company and that member have agreed to that member having access to documents on a website (instead of the documents being sent to him) and:
40
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(a) the documents are documents to which the agreement applies; and
(b) the text and images in the documents can be (as appropriate) read or seen using the naked eye; and
(c) the member is notified in a manner for the time being agreed for the purpose between the member and the Company of:
(1) the presence of the documents on a website;
(2) the address of that website;
(3) the place on that website where the documents may be accessed and how they may be accessed; and
(4) the period of time for which the documents will be available on the website, which must be the period specified in any applicable provision of the Companies Acts or, if there is no such period specified, for a period of not less than twenty-eight days from the date of notification or, if later, until the conclusion of any general meeting to which the documents relate; and
(d) the documents are published on that website throughout the period referred to in sub-paragraph (ii)(c)(4) above, provided that, if the documents are published on that website for a part but not all of such period, the documents will be treated as published throughout that period if the failure to publish those documents throughout that period is wholly attributable to circumstances which it would not be reasonable to have expected the Company to prevent or avoid.
(D) A member of the Company which is itself a company shall be deemed to have agreed that the Company may send a notice or other document in accordance with paragraph (C)(i) above if that member is deemed by a provision in the Companies Acts to have agreed that the notice or document may be so sent.
(E) Where a notice or other document is given or sent by electronic communication, it shall be deemed to have been received at the expiration of two hours from the time it was sent to an address supplied by the member or of notification to the member of its publication on a website. Proof that a notice or other document given or sent by electronic communication was given or sent in accordance with current guidance issued by the Institute of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators shall be conclusive evidence that the notice or document was sent or given.
Notices to joint shareholders
138 (A) Any notice given to that one of the joint holders of a share whose name stands first in the register of members in respect of the share shall be sufficient notice to all the joint holders in their capacity as such. For such purpose a joint holder having no registered address in the United Kingdom and not having supplied a postal address within the United Kingdom for the service of notices shall be disregarded.
(B) Save where prohibited by law, in any case where (but for this paragraph (B)) the agreement or consent of all the joint holders of a share is required for notice to be served, or documents or information to be sent, in a particular manner, then the agreement or consent of that one of the joint holders of the share whose name stands first in the register of members in respect of the share shall be sufficient agreement or consent for the purpose in question.
Notice when post not available
139 (A) Where, by reason of any suspension or curtailment of postal services, the Company is unable effectively to give notice of a general meeting, or meeting of the holders of any class of shares, the board may decide that the only persons to whom notice of the affected general meeting must be sent are the Directors; the Companys auditors; those members to whom notice to convene the general meeting can validly be sent by electronic means and those members to whom notification as to the availability of the notice of meeting on a website can validly be sent by electronic means. In any such case the Company shall also:
(i) advertise the general meeting in at least two national daily newspapers published in the United Kingdom; and
(ii) send or supply a confirmatory copy of the notice to members in the same manner as it sends or supplies notices by hand, post, electronic communication or on the Companys website, if at least seven clear days before the meeting the posting of notices again becomes practicable.
41
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Other notices and communications advertised in national newspaper
140 Any notice or document sent or supplied by to any member by the Company, not being a notice of a general meeting, shall be sufficiently sent or supplied if sent or supplied by advertisement in at least one national daily newspaper published in the United Kingdom. Any notice, document or information sent or supplied by the Company to the members or any of them by an advertisement in a national newspaper shall be deemed to have been received on the day on which the advertisement appears.
Deemed receipt of notice
141 A member present either in person or by proxy at any meeting of the Company or of the holders of any class of shares shall be deemed to have received notice of the meeting and of the purposes for which it was called.
Notices to successors of shareholders
142 A person entitled to a share in consequence of the death or bankruptcy of a member or otherwise by operation of law upon supplying to the Company such evidence as the Directors may reasonably require to show his title to the share, and upon supplying also a postal address within the United Kingdom for the service and delivery of notices and documents, and, if he wishes, an address for the service and delivery of electronic communications, shall be entitled to have served upon or delivered to him at any address given by him any notice or document to which the member but for his death or bankruptcy (or otherwise by operation of law) would have been entitled, and any such service or delivery shall for all purposes be deemed a sufficient service or delivery of such notice or document on all persons interested (whether jointly with or as claiming through or under him) in the share. Save as aforesaid any notice or document delivered or sent to a member in accordance with these Articles shall, notwithstanding that such member be then dead or bankrupt or in liquidation (or not entitled to the share otherwise by operation of law), and whether or not the Company have notice of his death or bankruptcy or liquidation (or entitled to the share otherwise by operation of law), be deemed to have been duly served or delivered in respect of any share registered in the name of such member as sole or first-named joint holder.
Loss of entitlement to notices
143 A member who (having no registered address within the United Kingdom) has not supplied to the Company a postal address within the United Kingdom for the service of notices, or an address for the service of notices by electronic communication, shall not be entitled to receive notices from the Company. If on three consecutive occasions a notice to a member has been returned undelivered, such member shall not thereafter be entitled to receive notices from the Company until he shall have communicated with the Company and supplied in writing to the Transfer Office a new registered address, or a postal address within the United Kingdom for the service of notices, or shall have informed the Company, in such manner as may be specified by the Company, of an address for the service of notices by electronic communication. For these purposes, a notice sent by post shall be treated as returned undelivered if the notice is sent back to the Company (or its agents), and a notice sent by electronic communication shall be treated as returned undelivered if the Company (or its agents) receive notification that the notice was not delivered to the address to which it was sent.
Savings
144 Nothing in these Articles shall affect any requirement of the Companies Acts that any particular offer, notice or other document be served in any particular manner (except to the extent that such requirement may be varied by a companys articles of association).
Winding Up
Petitioning for winding-up
145 The Directors shall have power in the name and on behalf of the Company to present a petition to the Court for the Company to be wound up.
Powers of liquidator
146 If the Company shall be wound up (whether the liquidation is voluntary, under supervision or by the Court) the Liquidator may, with the authority of a special resolution, divide among the members in specie or kind the whole or any part of the assets of the Company and whether or not the assets shall consist of property of one kind or shall consist of properties of different kinds, and may for such purpose set such value as he deems fair upon any one or more class or classes of property and may determine how such division shall be carried out as between the members or different classes of members. The Liquidator may, with the like authority, vest any part of the assets in trustees upon such trusts for the benefit of members as the Liquidator with the like authority shall think fit, and the liquidation of the Company may be closed and the Company dissolved, but so that no contributory shall be compelled to accept any shares or other property in respect of which there is a liability.
42
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
Indemnity
147 Subject to the provisions of and so far as may be consistent with the Companies Acts, every Director, Secretary or other officer of the Company shall be entitled to be indemnified by the Company against all costs, charges, losses, expenses and liabilities incurred by him in the execution and/or discharge of his duties and/or the exercise of his powers and/or otherwise in relation to or in connection with his duties, powers or office.
Approved Depositaries
Appointment of an Approved Depositary
148 The Directors may appoint as an approved depositary (Approved Depositary) any person:
(i) who is a member holding Ordinary Shares; or
(ii) on whose behalf Ordinary Shares are held by a nominee,
and the appointment of an Approved Depositary already effected prior to the adoption of these Articles shall remain in force on the terms and conditions as approved by the Directors.
An Approved Depositarys Nominee
149 An Approved Depositarys Nominee shall mean any member who holds Ordinary Shares as the Approved Depositarys nominee.
Manner of appointing an Approved Depositary
150 The appointment of an Approved Depositary shall be in writing and may be in relation to all or any specified number of such persons Overall Holding and be on such terms and conditions as the Directors may approve.
Overall Holding
151 The expression Overall Holding in relation to an Approved Depositary means the aggregate of the Ordinary Shares which shall for the time being be registered in the name of the Approved Depositary or its Nominee.
The Approved Depositary Register
152 (A) An Approved Depositary shall maintain a register or system(s) (Approved Depositary Register) in which shall be recorded the number of Ordinary Shares in relation to which the Approved Depositary has been appointed (Specified Shares).
(B) An Approved Depositary or its Nominee may appoint such person as it thinks fit as its proxy (including appointment by electronic communication) in relation to Specified Shares by entering the name of each such person (Appointed Person) in the Approved Depositary Register together with such details as the Directors shall require.
(C) Upon the entry of an Appointed Persons name in the Approved Depositary Register the Approved Depositary or its Nominee shall be deemed to have appointed such person as its proxy and otherwise conferred on him the rights set out under Article 154.
(D) The Approved Depositary Register shall:
(i) in the case of each Appointed Person specify the number (the Appointed Number) of Specified Shares in respect of which the appointment of the Appointed Person as a proxy has been made; and
(ii) be open to inspection by any person authorised by the Company or the Approved Depositary during usual business hours.
(E) The Approved Depositary shall furnish to the Company or its agents upon demand all such information contained in the Approved Depositary Register, or any part of it as may be requested.
Restrictions on the Approved Depositary
153 In relation to an Approved Depositary:
43
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(i) the aggregate of Appointed Numbers of Appointed Persons recorded in the Approved Depositary Register shall not exceed the aggregate number of Specified Shares so recorded; and
(ii) the aggregate number of Specified Shares recorded in the Approved Depositary Register shall not exceed the Approved Depositarys Overall Holding.
Rights of Appointed Persons
154 (A) Subject to the Companies Acts and subject to the provisions of these Articles an Appointed Person:
(i) shall upon production to the Company at any general meeting of written evidence of his status as an Appointed Person (which shall be in such form as the Company and the Approved Depositary shall determine from time to time) be entitled in relation to that meeting to the same rights, and subject to the same restrictions, in relation to his Appointed Number of Specified Shares as though he had been validly appointed as a proxy in relation to such Specified Shares by his Approved Depositary or his Approved Depositarys Nominee in accordance with Articles 76 80 (inclusive); and
(ii) shall himself be entitled to appoint any other person as proxy in relation to his Appointed Number of Specified Shares (or some lesser number of them) using any of the means by which a proxy may be appointed under or pursuant to Articles 76 80 (inclusive) and so that the provisions of these Articles relating to the appointment by a member of a person to act as proxy, and to the revocation of such an appointment, and relating to the rights and duties of the person so appointed, shall apply equally in relation to the appointment of a person as the proxy of an Appointed Person in relation to his Appointed Number of Specified Shares, as though the Appointed Person was the registered holder of Ordinary Shares of the Appointed Number and he had appointed his proxy under or pursuant to the provisions of Articles 76 80 (inclusive).
(B) Subject to such terms and conditions as may have been agreed between the Company and the Approved Depositary and to such terms and conditions as govern the relationship between the Approved Depositary and its Appointed Persons, the Approved Depositary or its Nominee shall, on the request of an Appointed Person, exercise in relation to the Appointed Persons Appointed Number of Specified Shares such other rights in relation to general meetings of the Company as may be conferred upon a member of the Company by the Companies Acts and the Articles.
Reserved rights of an Approved Depositary (or its Nominee)
155 For the avoidance of doubt and subject to Article 159 an Approved Depositary or its Nominee shall as between the Approved Depositary or its Nominee on the one hand and the Company on the other be entitled in relation to any general meeting to exercise all the voting rights in relation to all or any of the shares comprised in that Approved Depositarys Overall Holding, and in particular may exercise the right to vote in person (or by corporate representative) notwithstanding the appointment by that Approved Depositary or its Nominee of any Appointed Person(s), the rights conferred by such appointment, or the exercise of such rights.
Service of notices and documents on Appointed Persons
156 The Company may, if requested by any Approved Depositary, send to each Appointed Person entered in the Approved Depositary Register all notices and other documents which are sent to the holders of Ordinary Shares. Any such notices and documents shall be sent to the postal address of the Appointed Person in question as it appears in the Approved Depositary Register, save that if he shall have an address for electronic communication recorded in the Approved Depositary Register, they may be sent by electronic communication to that address.
Payments to Appointed Persons
157 The Company may if requested by an Approved Depositary pay to an Appointed Person at his postal address as shown in the Approved Depositary Register or by electronic funds transmission to an account notified by the Approved Person all dividends payable on the Ordinary Shares in respect of which he has been appointed as an Appointed Person, and payment of any such dividend shall be a good discharge to the Company of its obligation to make payment of the dividend in question in respect of the Ordinary Shares concerned.
Record dates in relation to Appointed Persons
158 (A) For the purposes of determining which persons are entitled as Appointed Persons:
(i) to exercise the rights conferred by Article 154;
(ii) to receive documents sent pursuant to Article 156; and
(iii) to be paid dividends paid pursuant to Article 157,
44
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
and each such persons Appointed Number of Specified Shares the Approved Depositary may determine that the Appointed Persons so entitled shall be the persons entered as such in the Approved Depositary Register at the close of business on any date specified for the particular purpose and determined by agreement between the Approved Depositary and the Company (the Approved Depositary Record Date).
(B) When the Approved Depositary Record Date is determined for a particular purpose then subject to Article 159:
(i) each Appointed Persons Appointed Number of Specified Shares shall be the number appearing against his name in the Approved Depositary Register as at the close of business on the Approved Depositary Record Date; and
(ii) changes to entries in the Approved Depositary Register after the close of business on the Approved Depositary Record Date shall be disregarded in determining the entitlement of any person for the particular purpose specified in setting the Approved Depositary Record Date.
Adjustments to votes
159 If it appears:
(i) in relation to a particular resolution at a particular meeting; and
(ii) in relation to a particular Approved Depositary,
that the aggregate number of votes cast by or on behalf of the Approved Depositary would without an adjustment exceed that Approved Depositarys Overall Holding at the time specified under Article 56(E) for establishing the entitlement of members of the Company to attend or vote at the meeting then such adjustments shall be made to the aggregate number of votes cast for or against the resolution so that the total number of votes cast by or on behalf of the Approved Depositary does not exceed that Approved Depositarys Overall Holding and the following provisions for making that adjustment shall apply:
(a) such adjustments (which may be adjustments to nil) may be adjustments of all votes which would otherwise be cast by or on behalf of the Approved Depositary or of some of them only and then in the latter event such adjustments may vary as between some votes and others;
(b) if it is willing and able to do so within such time as the chairman of the meeting may prescribe, such adjustments shall be made by the Approved Depositary;
(c) in any other case such adjustments shall be made by the chairman of the meeting on a pro rata basis or in such other manner as may have been prescribed by regulations or procedures made or established by the Directors for the purposes of Article 79 or this sub-paragraph (c); and
(d) any adjustments made in good faith in accordance with this Article 159 shall be final and conclusive and binding on all persons interested.
For the avoidance of doubt votes cast by or on behalf of the Approved Depositary shall include votes cast by its Nominee, or by any Appointed Person appointed by that Depositary or its Nominee, or by any proxy of such an Appointed Person.
No recognition of trusts etc
160 Except as required by law, no Appointed Person shall be recognised by the Company as holding any interest in shares upon any trust and subject to the recognition of the rights conferred in relation to general meetings by appointments made by Appointed Persons pursuant to Article 154(A)(ii) the Company shall be entitled to treat any person entered in the Approved Depositary Register as an Appointed Person as the only person (other than the Approved Depositary or its Nominee) who has any interest in the Specified Shares in respect of which the Appointed Person has been appointed.
Determination of questions relating to an Appointed Persons rights
161 Subject and without prejudice to the provisions of Article 159, if in any circumstances other than those provided for in that Article any question shall arise as to whether an Appointed Person or a proxy for an Appointed Person has been validly appointed to vote (or exercise any other right) in respect of any Specified Shares or as to the Appointed Number of Specified Shares in respect of which he is entitled to do so, then:
45
The Companies Act 2006 Company Limited by Shares |
No. 102498 BP p.l.c. |
(i) if such question arises at or in relation to a general meeting it shall be determined by the chairman of the meeting or in such other manner as may have been prescribed by regulations or procedures made or established by the Directors under Article 79; and
(ii) if it arises in any other circumstances it shall be determined by the Directors,
and any such determination if made in good faith shall be final and conclusive and binding on all persons interested.
46
Exhibit 4.10
BP p.l.c.
RULES OF THE BP SHARE AWARD PLAN 2015
Shareholders Approval: | ● 2015 | |||
[Designated Corporate Officers | ● 2015 | |||
Adoption:] | ||||
Expiry Date: | ● 2025 |
Linklaters
Linklaters LLP
One Silk Street
London EC2Y 8HQ
Telephone (+44) 20 7456 2000
Facsimile (+44) 20 7456 2222
Ref 01/140/Graham Rowlands-Hempel
Table of Contents
Contents
Page | ||||||
1 |
Definitions | 1 | ||||
2 |
Granting Awards | 3 | ||||
3 |
Documentation of Awards | 4 | ||||
4 |
Limits | 5 | ||||
5 |
Before Vesting | 6 | ||||
6 |
Vesting | 7 | ||||
7 |
Retention Period | 9 | ||||
8 |
Leaving employment | 11 | ||||
9 |
Malus and clawback | 13 | ||||
10 |
Takeovers and other corporate events | 15 | ||||
11 |
Changing the Plan | 16 | ||||
12 |
General | 17 | ||||
13 |
Sub-Plans | 20 |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
i
1 | Definitions |
In these rules:
Acquiring Company means a person who has or obtains control (within the meaning of Section 995 of the Income Tax Act 2007) of the Company;
ADS means an American depositary share representing ordinary shares of the Company;
Award means a conditional right to receive Shares each of which can take the form of a Conditional Award, Restricted Shares or an Option and includes an Award which has continued during a Retention Period;
Award Date means the date on which an Award is granted under rule 2.3.8;
Basic Salary means annual rate of gross salary, not including bonus or other variable remuneration. It includes basic salary from all members of the Group;
Bonus Deferral Award means an Award which is granted to a Participant in lieu of any bonus which they might otherwise have been paid in cash and which is designated as such by the Designated Corporate Officers;
Business Day means a day on which the London Stock Exchange (or, if relevant and if the Designated Corporate Officer determines, any stock exchange nominated by the Designated Corporate Officer on which the Shares are traded) is open for the transaction of business;
Buy-out Award means any Awards made to compensate for awards forfeit on recruitment;
Company means BP p.l.c;
Conditional Award means a conditional right to receive Shares granted under the Plan;
Dealing Restrictions means restrictions imposed by statute, order, regulation or Government directive, or by the Model Code or any code adopted by the Company based on the Model Code and for this purpose the Model Code means the Model Code on dealings in securities set out in Listing Rule 9, annex 1 (of the London Stock Exchange), as varied from time to time;
Designated Corporate Officer means the Group Chief Executive or other appropriate Corporate Officer authorised under BPs System of Internal Control and associated delegations;
Dividend Equivalent means an amount linked to dividends paid on Shares subject to the Award;
Final Lapse Date means the latest date on which an Option will lapse set by the Designated Corporate Officer under rule 2.3.11 which will not be later than the 10 th anniversary of the Award Date;
Grantor means the Company or any other entity which agrees to satisfy an Award under the Plan;
Group means:
(i) | the Company; |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
1
(ii) | its Subsidiaries from time to time; or |
(iii) | any other company which is associated with the Company and is so designated by the Designated Corporate Officer and, for the avoidance of doubt, a company may be treated as an associated company for some purposes or in relation to some Participants but not in relation to others; |
London Stock Exchange means London Stock Exchange plc;
Market Value means, on any date, the market value determined by the Designated Corporate Officer in such manner as they consider reasonable (which, without limitation, may use an average price over a period ending on that date and which may be different for different purposes under the Plan);
Normal Vesting Date means the date set for Vesting of an Award under rule 2.3.5;
Option means a right grant under the Plan to acquire Shares on exercise;
Option Price means the amount (which may be zero) payable on the exercise of an Option set by the Designated Corporate Officer under rule 2.3.11;
Participant means a person holding an Award or their personal representatives who have produced such evidence as the Designated Corporate Officer may reasonably require of their status;
Performance Condition means any performance condition imposed under rule 2.3.4;
Plan means these rules known as The BP Share Award Plan 2015, as changed from time to time;
Restricted Shares means Shares held in the name of or for the benefit of a Participant subject to the Restricted Share Agreement;
Restricted Share Agreement means the agreement referred to in rule 3.2;
Retention Period means any period during which rule 7 will apply;
Retention Shares means the Shares which are subject to a Retention Period;
Shares means fully paid ordinary shares in the capital of the Company and includes ADSs where appropriate;
Subsidiary means a company which is a subsidiary of the Company within the meaning of Section 1159 of the Companies Act 2006;
Takeover means:
(i) | a person (or a group of persons acting in concert) obtaining control (within the meaning of Section 995 of the Income Tax Act 2007) of the Company as the result of a general offer to acquire Shares becoming wholly unconditional; or |
(ii) | a court sanctioning a compromise or arrangement in connection with the acquisition of Shares under Section 895 of the Companies Act 2006 or equivalent procedure under local legislation; or |
(iii) | a person (or a group of persons acting in concert) obtaining control (within the meaning of Section 995 of the Income Tax Act 2007) of the Company in any other way. |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
2
Vesting means, subject to the rules and any Retention Period:
(i) | in relation to an Option, an Option becoming exercisable; |
(ii) | in relation to a Conditional Award, a Participant becoming entitled to have the Shares issued or transferred to them; and |
(iii) | in relation to Restricted Shares, the restrictions set out in the Restricted Share Agreement ceasing to have effect as described in rule 6.2.3; |
and Vesting shall include the term Vest and Vested.
2 | Granting Awards |
2.1 | Eligibility |
The Grantor may grant an Award to any employee of any member of the Group selected by it, but an Award may not be granted to a director of the Company.
2.2 | Timing of Awards |
Awards may only be granted within 42 days starting on any of the following:
2.2.1 | the date of shareholder approval of the Plan; |
2.2.2 | the day after the announcement of the Companys results for any period; |
2.2.3 | the date of the Companys annual general meeting; |
2.2.4 | any day on which the Designated Corporate Officer resolves that exceptional circumstances exist which justify the grant of Awards; |
2.2.5 | any day on which changes to the legislation or regulations affecting share plans are announced, effected or made; or |
2.2.6 | if the granting of Awards during any period specified above is prevented by any Dealing Restrictions, the date on which it is no longer prevented. |
No Awards may be granted after the 10th anniversary of the date on which the Plan was approved by the Company in a general meeting or such earlier date as the Designated Corporate Officer may specify.
2.3 | Terms set at grant |
When granting an Award the Designated Corporate Officer may set the following terms:
2.3.1 | whether the Award is over Shares or ADSs; |
2.3.2 | whether the Award will take the form of: |
(i) | a Conditional Award; |
(ii) | an Option; |
(iii) | Restricted Shares, |
or a combination of these;
2.3.3 | subject to rule 4.1, the number of Shares subject to the Award; |
2.3.4 | the terms of any Performance Condition; |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
3
2.3.5 | the Normal Vesting Date, or Dates if there is more than one in respect of an Award, and if relevant, the extent to which the Award will be capable of Vesting on each Normal Vesting Date (unless specified in any Performance Condition); |
2.3.6 | whether or not a Retention Period will apply and if so, when it will normally end and how the number of Retention Shares will be determined; |
2.3.7 | whether or not the Award carries a Dividend Equivalent (see rule 6.3) and, if so, the basis on which it will be calculated; |
2.3.8 | the Award Date; |
2.3.9 | whether the Award is a Bonus Deferral Award; |
2.3.10 | whether the Award will be cash settled as described in rule 6.4; and |
2.3.11 | in the case of an Option, the Option Price and the Final Lapse Date; |
2.4 | Performance Conditions |
The Designated Corporate Officer may decide that Vesting of an Award will be conditional on the satisfaction of one or more conditions set by the Designated Corporate Officer on grant. The Performance Conditions may be linked to the performance of the Company, the Participant and/or any member of the Group or any other matter and may provide that the Award will lapse to the extent that they are not satisfied. Performance Conditions will normally be tested over at least three financial years of the Company.
The Designated Corporate Officer may change a Performance Condition if anything happens which causes the Designated Corporate Officer to consider it appropriate to do so.
2.5 | No payment for Awards |
A Participant is not required to pay for the grant of an Award.
3 | Documentation of Awards |
3.1 | Awards other than Restricted Shares |
An Award (other than an Award of Restricted Shares) will be granted by deed or by resolution if determined by the Designated Corporate Officer and the Participant will be notified of the grant of the Award and the terms set under rule 2.3.
3.2 | Restricted Shares |
Where an Award takes the form of Restricted Shares, the Participant must (if required by the Designated Corporate Officer) enter into:
3.2.1 | an agreement with the Grantor, that to the extent that the Award lapses under the Plan, the Shares are forfeited and they will immediately transfer their interest in them, for no consideration or nominal consideration, to any person (which may include the Company, where permitted) specified by the Grantor; |
3.2.2 | any tax elections required by the Designated Corporate Officer; |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
4
3.2.3 | any other documentation which the Designated Corporate Officer considers necessary or desirable to give effect to the terms of the Award, including a power of attorney or blank stock transfer form. |
if they do not do so within a period specified by the Designated Corporate Officer, the Award will lapse at the end of that period.
On or after the grant of an Award of Restricted Shares, the Grantor will procure that the relevant number of Shares is issued or transferred to the Participant or to another person to be held for the benefit of the Participant under the terms of the Plan. The share certificates or other documents of title relating to any Restricted Shares may be retained by the Grantor.
4 | Limits |
4.1 | Individual limit |
An Award must not be granted to a person if it would, at the proposed Award Date, cause the Market Value of Shares subject to Awards (as at the relevant Award Date) that they have been granted in respect of that financial year to exceed 550% of their Basic Salary.
The following will be excluded from this limit:
4.1.1 | Shares which may be acquired under any Dividend Equivalent; |
4.1.2 | Bonus Deferral Awards; and |
4.1.3 | Buy-out Awards. |
4.2 | Plan limits10 per cent |
An Award must not be granted if the number of Shares committed to be issued under that Award exceeds 10 per cent of the ordinary share capital of the Company in issue immediately before that day, when added to the number of Shares which have been issued, or committed to be issued, to satisfy Awards under the Plan, or options or awards under any other employee share plan operated by the Company, granted in the previous 10 years.
4.3 | Plan limits5 per cent |
An Award must not be granted if the number of Shares committed to be issued under that Award exceeds 5 per cent of the ordinary share capital of the Company in issue immediately before that day, when added to the number of Shares which have been issued, or committed to be issued, to satisfy Awards under the Plan, or options or awards under any other discretionary employee share plan adopted by the Company, granted in the previous 10 years.
4.4 | Scope of Plan limits |
When calculating the limits in rules 4.2 and 4.3, Shares will be ignored:
4.4.1 | where the right to acquire them is released or lapses; |
4.4.2 | which are committed to be issued under any Dividend Equivalent. |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
5
As long as so required by The Investment Association, shares transferred from treasury to satisfy Awards are counted as part of the ordinary share capital of the Company, and as shares issued by the Company.
4.5 | Awards in breach of limits |
If the Grantor tries to grant an Award which is inconsistent with this rule 4, the Award will be limited and will take effect from the Award Date on a basis consistent with this rule.
5 | Before Vesting |
5.1 | Voting and dividends |
5.1.1 | A Participant is not entitled to vote, to receive dividends or to have any other rights of a shareholder in respect of Shares subject to an Option or a Conditional Award until the Shares are issued or transferred to the Participant. |
5.1.2 | Except to the extent specified in the Restricted Share Agreement, a Participant will have all rights of a shareholder in respect of Restricted Shares until the Award lapses. |
5.2 | Transfer |
Unless agreed by the Corporate Designated Officer, a Participant may not transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of an Award or any rights in respect of it. If they do, whether voluntarily or involuntarily, then that Award will immediately lapse. This rule 5.2 does not apply to the transmission of an Award on the death of a Participant to his personal representatives.
5.3 | Adjustment of Awards |
5.3.1 | If there is: |
(i) | a variation in the equity share capital of the Company, including a capitalisation or rights issue, sub-division, consolidation or reduction of share capital; |
(ii) | a demerger (in whatever form) or exempt distribution by virtue of Section 1075 of the Corporation Tax Act 2010; |
(iii) | a special dividend or distribution, or |
(iv) | any other corporate event which might affect the current or future value of any Award, |
the Designated Corporate Officer may adjust the number or class of Shares or securities subject to the Award and, in the case of an Option, the Option Price.
5.3.2 | Subject to the Restricted Share Agreement, a Participant will have the same rights as any other shareholders in respect of Restricted Shares where rule 5.3.1 applies. Any shares, securities or rights allotted to a Participant as a result of such an event will be: |
(i) | treated as if they were awarded to the Participant under the Plan in the same way and at the same time as the Restricted Shares in respect of which the rights were conferred; and |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
6
(ii) | subject to the rules of the Plan and the terms of the Restricted Share Agreement. |
6 | Vesting |
6.1 | Timing and extent of Vesting |
Subject to the rest of these rules, an Award will Vest on the later of the following:
6.1.1 | the Normal Vesting Date; |
6.1.2 | the date on which the Designated Corporate Officer determines the extent to which any Performance Condition or any other conditions are satisfied (which they will do as soon as reasonably practicable after the end of the period over which they are tested); |
or on any other date on which the Award Vests under these rules. For the avoidance of doubt where there is more than one Normal Vesting Date in respect of an Award then the Award will only be capable of Vesting to the extent stated on grant under rule 2.3.5 on each Normal Vesting Date.
6.2 | Consequences of Vesting |
6.2.1 | If an Award takes the form of a Conditional Award, as soon as reasonably practicable after Vesting, the Grantor will arrange (subject to the rest of this rule 6 and rules 7, 9 and 12) for the issue or transfer to, or to the order of, the Participant, of the number of Shares in respect of which the Award has Vested. |
6.2.2 | A Participant can only exercise an Option to the extent it has Vested. To exercise it, the Participant must give notice in any prescribed form to the Grantor and pay any Option Price or make arrangements satisfactory to the Grantor for its payment. Subject to the rest of this rule 6 and rules 7, 9 and 12, the Grantor will arrange for Shares to be issued or transferred to the Participant within 30 days of the date on which the Option is exercised. Notwithstanding anything else in these rules, an Option will always lapse on the Final Lapse Date if it does not lapse earlier under these rules. |
6.2.3 | To the extent an Award of Restricted Shares Vests, the restrictions referred to in rule 3 and contained in the Restricted Share Agreement will cease to apply. |
6.3 | Dividend Equivalent |
If an Award carries a Dividend Equivalent, the Participant will be entitled to an amount equal to the dividends paid on the number of Shares in respect of which the Award Vests from the Award Date to the date of Vesting (rounded down to the nearest whole Share). The Dividend Equivalent may be determined on the basis that any dividend is notionally reinvested in further Shares from the date of payment.
The Dividend Equivalent will be paid in cash or additional Shares as determined by the Designated Corporate Officer.
In the case of an Option, the Designated Corporate Officer may decide, when the Option is granted, that the Dividend Equivalent:
6.3.1 | will relate to dividends from the Award Date to the date of Vesting and |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
7
(i) | will be added to the number of Shares in respect of which the Award Vests; and/or |
(ii) | will be paid on exercise instead of Vesting; and/or |
6.3.2 | will relate to dividends from the Award Date to the date of exercise instead of the date of Vesting; and/or |
6.3.3 | will be paid in respect of the number of Shares in respect of which the Option is exercised. |
6.4 | Cash and share alternative |
The Grantor may satisfy an Option or Conditional Award by paying the Participant an amount in cash equal to the Market Value of the number of Shares in respect of which the Award Vests or is exercised. In the case of an Option, the Option Price can be deducted from the amount of cash and the Participant need not pay it.
An Award may be granted on the basis that it will always be satisfied in this way.
Where a Participant becomes entitled to a cash payment under these rules, the Grantor can satisfy that entitlement by issuing or transferring a number of Shares which have a Market Value on the date of entitlement equal to the amount of cash.
6.5 | Delay in Vesting or issue or transfer of Shares |
If Vesting or the issue or transfer of Shares in satisfaction of an Award is prevented by any Dealing Restriction, the period for Vesting, issue or transfer will be delayed for that Award until the Dealing Restriction no longer applies.
6.6 | Automatic exercise of Options |
6.6.1 | To the extent that: |
(i) | an Option is exercisable but has not been exercised by the close of the Business Day before the date on which it would lapse but for this rule 6.6; and |
(ii) | it is in the money on that day, |
the Company will, unless the Designated Corporate Officer decides otherwise, treat it as having been exercised on that day.
6.6.2 | The Company will, subject to any decision made under rule 6.6.4 arrange for sufficient of the Shares resulting from the exercise to be sold on behalf of the Participant to raise an amount (after costs of sale) equal to the Option Price and any tax or social security required to be withheld under rule 12.2. The remaining Shares subject to the Option will be issued or transferred as set out in rule 6.2.2. |
6.6.3 | An Option is in the money on any day, if the Designated Corporate Officer estimate that, if all the Shares resulting from exercise were sold on that day, the sale proceeds (after making a reasonable allowance for any costs of sale) would be more than the Option Price. |
6.6.4 | The Participant may give notice, at any time before the day referred to in rule 6.6.1, requesting that this rule 6.6 not apply to the Option. |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
8
6.6.5 | For the avoidance of doubt, this rule 6.6 will not apply to the extent that the Option lapses by virtue of the Participant leaving employment or under rule 8.8 (but will apply if at the end of the period for exercise following leaving employment). No member of the Group will be liable for any loss incurred by the Participant as a result of the application or failure to apply this rule 6.6. |
7 | Retention Period |
This rule 7 applies if the Designated Corporate Officer determines under rule 2.3 that an Award is subject to a Retention Period.
7.1 | How the Retention Period will apply to an Award |
7.1.1 | Before the Award Vests, the Designated Corporate Officer will determine whether: |
(i) | the Award will continue in respect of the Retention Shares through the Retention Period (subject to this rule 7); or |
(ii) | the Retention Shares will be issued or transferred into the beneficial ownership of the Participant ( Owned Shares ) and held in accordance with this rule 7. |
7.1.2 | Where the Designated Corporate Officer determines that the Award will continue through the Retention Period, they shall calculate the number of Shares which Vest in accordance with rule 6.1 but the Retention Shares will only be issued or transferred or cash paid under rule 6.2 at the end of the Retention Period and subject to this rule 7. |
7.1.3 | Where the Designated Corporate Officer has determined that Owned Shares will be issued or transferred to the Participant, they will calculate the number of Shares which Vest in accordance with rule 6.1 and will issue or transfer the beneficial ownership of the Retention Shares (if not already held in respect of an Award of Restricted Shares), for no consideration, to any person specified by the Designated Corporate Officer to be held during the Retention Period under this rule 7. |
7.1.4 | Where the Award is an Option and the Designated Corporate Officer has determined that it will continue during the Retention Period, the Option will become exercisable as described in rule 6.2 and any Retention Shares acquired on the exercise of the Option during the Retention Period (less any tax paid) will continue to be held as Owned Shares. |
7.2 | Tax |
Where tax is payable at the start of the Retention Period then rule 12.2 (Tax) will apply and Shares may be sold or the number of Shares under Award reduced under that rule. To the extent they are, the Retention Period will apply in respect of the remainder of the Shares.
7.3 | Rights during the Retention Period |
7.3.1 | The following additional provisions will apply to Owned Shares during the Retention Period: |
(i) | The Participant will be entitled to vote and to receive dividends and have all other rights of a shareholder in respect of the Owned Shares from the date the Participant becomes the beneficial owner. |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
9
(ii) | The Participant may not transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of the Owned Shares or any interest in them (or instruct anyone to do so) except in the case of: |
(a) | the sale of sufficient entitlements nil-paid in relation to a Share to take up the balance of the entitlements under a rights issue or similar transaction; or |
(b) | to fund any tax in accordance with rule 7.2. |
(iii) | Any securities which the Participant receives in respect of Owned Shares as a result of an event described in rule 5.3 during the Retention Period will, unless the Designated Corporate Officer decides otherwise, be subject to the same restrictions as the corresponding Owned Shares. This will not apply to any Shares which a Participant acquires on a rights issue or similar transaction to the extent that they exceed the number he would have acquired on a sale of sufficient rights under the rights issued nil-paid to take up the balance of the rights. |
7.3.2 | The following provisions will apply during the Retention Period where an Award continues through the Retention Period: |
(i) | Except as required under rule 7.2 (tax), the Participant will have no rights in respect of the Retention Shares until the Shares are acquired at the end of the Retention Period. |
(ii) | The Participant may not transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of the Retention Shares subject to any Award or any interest in them. |
(iii) | If the Award carried a Dividend Equivalent, rule 6.3 will apply from the Award Date until the end of the Retention Period. |
7.4 | Leaving employment and the Retention Period |
7.4.1 | If the Participant leaves employment during the Retention Period rule 8.1 will not apply unless the Designated Corporate Officer decides otherwise. |
7.4.2 | If a Participant leaves employment before the start of the Retention Period and the Award does not lapse, the Designated Corporate Officer may decide that the Retention Period will not apply. |
7.5 | Forfeiture of Owned Shares |
To the extent that Owned Shares are forfeited under rule 9, the Participant is deemed to consent to the immediate transfer of their beneficial ownership of the Shares, for no consideration or nominal consideration, to any person (which may include the Company, where permitted) specified by the Designated Corporate Officer.
7.6 | End of the Retention Period |
7.6.1 | The Retention Period will end on the earliest of the following: |
(i) | the date on which the Retention Period will normally end, as set by the Designated Corporate Officer in relation to the Award under rule 2.3; |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
10
(ii) | the date on which the Designated Corporate Officer decides that the number of Retention Shares is sufficiently small that the continuation of the Retention Period is not warranted; |
(iii) | the date on which the Participant dies; and |
(iv) | the date on which a Takeover or other transaction by virtue of which rule 10.1 applies, unless the Award is exchanged. |
7.6.2 | At the end of a Retention Period, the restrictions relating to Owned Shares in rule 7.3.1 will cease to apply and the Shares will be transferred to the Participant or as they may direct. |
7.6.3 | At the end of a Retention Period, rule 6 will apply and the Shares will be issued or transferred or cash paid to the Participant. |
8 | Leaving employment |
8.1 | General rule |
Subject to rule 8.5, an Award will lapse if the Participant leaves employment before the Award Vests.
8.2 | Exceptions |
If a Participant leaves employment before the Award Vests:
8.2.1 | for one of the reasons set out below; or |
8.2.2 | in any other circumstances if the Designated Corporate Officer so decides, |
their Award will not lapse but will continue in effect and the Award will Vest (if at all) to the extent any Performance Condition is satisfied on the date of Vesting. Unless the Designated Corporate Officer decides otherwise, the number of Shares in respect of which it Vests will also be reduced on a pro-rata basis to reflect the fact that they left early.
The reasons are:
8.2.3 | ill-health, injury or disability, as established to the satisfaction of the Company; |
8.2.4 | retirement with the agreement of the Participants employer; |
8.2.5 | the Participants employing company ceasing to be a member of the Group; |
8.2.6 | a transfer of the undertaking, or the part of the undertaking, in which the Participant works to a person which is neither a member of the Group; or |
8.2.7 | redundancy within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in circumstances where a redundancy payment is payable. |
8.3 | Death |
8.3.1 | If a Participant dies, their Award will Vest, to the extent described in rule 8.2 on the date of death. |
8.3.2 | If the Award is subject to a Performance Condition, rule 8.4.3 will apply or the Designated Corporate Officer may decide to waive the Performance Condition. |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
11
8.3.3 | If the Award is an Option, it will be exercisable for two years from the date of death, after which it will lapse. |
8.4 | Early Vesting |
8.4.1 | If rule 8.2 applies, the Designated Corporate Officer may decide that the Participants Award will Vest, to the extent described in that rule, on the date of leaving or a later date determined by that Designated Corporate Officer. |
8.4.2 | If the Award is an Option, it will be exercisable for six months (or such longer period as the Designated Corporate Officer may allow) from the date of leaving, after which it will lapse. |
8.4.3 | If the Award is subject to a Performance Condition, the Designated Corporate Officer will determine the extent to which it is satisfied on the date of Vesting in accordance with its terms or, if not specified in those terms, he or she will estimate the extent to which it would be satisfied in such manner as he or she considers reasonable. |
8.5 | Bonus Deferral Awards and Buy-out Awards |
The Designated Corporate Officer may decide that rule 8.1 will not apply to Bonus Deferral Awards or Buy-out Awards or will apply subject to such modifications as may be determined at grant.
8.6 | Period for exercise of Options |
After the Participant has left employment, an Option will lapse six months (or such other period as the Designated Corporate Officer may allow) from the latest of:
8.6.1 the date on which he left;
8.6.2 the date on which the Option Vests under rule 8; and
8.6.3 the end of any applicable Retention Period.
8.7 | General |
8.7.1 | A Participant will only be treated as leaving employment when he is no longer an employee of any member of the Group and will not be treated as leaving employment if he commences employment with a member of the Group within seven days of leaving. |
8.7.2 | The Designated Corporate Officer may decide that a Participant will be treated as leaving employment on the date he gives or is given notice terminating his office or employment. |
8.7.3 | The Designated Corporate Officer may exercise any discretion under this rule 8 differently in relation to different Awards held by the same Participant. |
8.8 | Transfer |
If a Participant has not left employment but is transferred to work in another country or changes tax resident status and, as a result they would:
8.8.1 | suffer a tax disadvantage in relation to their Award (this being shown to the satisfaction of the Designated Corporate Officer); or |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
12
8.8.2 | become subject to restrictions on his ability to hold or deal in the Shares or the proceeds of the sale of the Shares acquired on Vesting or exercise because of the securities laws or exchange control laws of the country to which he is transferred, |
then the Designated Corporate Office may decide that the Award will Vest on a date they choose before or after the transfer takes effect. The Award will Vest to the extent they permit and will lapse as to the balance.
8.9 | Career Breaks |
8.9.1 | If a Participant is on a career break on the date that their Awards would ordinarily Vest under the Plan, then unless the Designated Corporate Officer determines otherwise in any particular case, the Awards will Vest in accordance with these rules (but subject to any Retention Period) as soon as practicable after it has been determined that the Participant has returned to normal employment at the end of the career break and has continued to be in their normal employment for a period of three months from the date of return, and in that period has not given or received notice of termination of employment. For the purposes of this rule, career break means an extended period of unpaid leave from normal work, without ceasing to be an employee of any member of the Group with the agreement of the Company which is designated by the Designated Corporate Officer as a career break for the purposes of these rules. |
8.9.2 | Unless any of the reasons set out in rules 8.2, 8.3 or 10 apply, if the Participant ceases to be an employee or director of any member of the Group before having returned to normal employment at the end of the career break or during the three month period referred to in rule 8.9.1, then the Awards will lapse on cessation of employment. If any of the reasons set out in rules 8.2 or 8.3 do apply, the Awards will Vest in accordance with these rules (but subject to any Retention Period) as soon as practicable after cessation of employment. If any of the reasons set out in rule 10 apply, Awards will Vest in accordance with that rule. |
9 | Malus and clawback |
9.1 | Application of malus and clawback |
Notwithstanding any other rules of the Plan the Designated Corporate Officer may decide that malus will apply if the Designated Corporate Officer has determined that one or more of the following circumstances below have arisen and, in the case of clawback, if the circumstance described in rules 9.1.1 , 9.1.4 or 9.1.5) have arisen.
The circumstances are:
9.1.1 | The Participant has engaged in conduct (including, but not limited to, a violation of the BP Code of Conduct) which the Designated Corporate Officer considers was contrary to the legitimate expectations of the Company for an employee in the Participants position (or the position occupied by the Participant before he left the Group). |
9.1.2 | Results announced for any period have been restated or subsequently appeared materially financially inaccurate or misleading as determined by the Designated Corporate Officer. |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
13
9.1.3 | A business unit or profit centre in which the Participant worked has made a material financial loss as a result of circumstances that could reasonably have been risk-managed and which leads to or is likely to create reputational damage to the Group. |
9.1.4 | Any team, business area, member of the Group or profit centre in which the Participant works has been the subject of any regulatory investigation or has been in breach of any laws, rules or codes of conduct applicable to it or the standards reasonably expected of it. |
9.1.5 | The Designated Corporate Officer determines that material reputational damage has been caused to the Group or any Member of the Group for which the Participant is responsible or accountable and which could have been reasonably avoided or mitigated. |
9.1.6 | Any other event as a result of which the Directors consider that the application of this rule is appropriate. |
9.2 | Malus |
Where the Designated Corporate Officer decides that malus will apply to a Participant:
9.2.1 | the Award will lapse or, in the case of Owned Shares, will be forfeited, wholly or in part as they may determine; and/or |
9.2.2 | the Restricted Period or any Holding Period for any Award will be extended by such period as he may determine; and/or |
9.2.3 | if the Award has already Vested but Shares have not yet been Released (because of, for example, any Dealing Restrictions), a reduced number of Shares as determined by the Designated Corporate Officer will be Released to the Participant. |
9.3 | Clawback |
Where the Designated Corporate Officer decides that clawback will apply to a Participant then the Participant must transfer to or to the order of the Company, for no consideration, a number of Shares equal (or as may be required less than) those which they acquired pursuant to any Award or pay to or to the order of the Company an amount equal to the market value of such Shares.
9.4 | General |
9.4.1 | For the avoidance of doubt, circumstances described in rule 9.1 can arise even if the Participant was not responsible for the event in question or if it happened before or after the Vesting or grant of the Award. |
9.4.2 | Malus and/or clawback may be applied differently for different Participants or for different Awards held by the same Participant in relation to the same event. |
9.4.3 | The Designated Corporate Officer will notify the Participant of any application of malus or clawback. |
9.4.4 | Without limiting rule 12.1, the Participant will not be entitled to any compensation in respect of any application of malus or clawback. |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
14
9.5 | Joining a Competitor Organisation |
Where a Participant has ceased to be an employee but has retained their Award as a consequence of rule 8.2 the Designated Corporate Officer retains the right to lapse their Award or forfeit their Retention Shares if, prior to acquiring the Shares, the Participant joins a Competitor Organisation of any member of the Group within 12 months of ceasing to be an employee. The Designated Corporate Officer will have the sole discretion to determine the definition of Competitor Organisation.
10 | Takeovers and other corporate events |
10.1 | Takeovers |
10.1.1 | Unless exchanged under rule 10.3, all Awards will Vest on a Takeover to the extent described in rule 10.2. |
10.1.2 | If the Company is or may be affected by: |
(i) | any demerger, delisting, distribution (other than an ordinary dividend) or other transaction which, in the opinion of the Designated Corporate Officer, might affect the current or future value of any Award, or |
(ii) | any reverse takeover (not within rule 10.1.1), merger by way of a dual listed company or other significant corporate event, as determined by the Designated Corporate Officer, |
the Designated Corporate Officer may allow an Award to Vest to the extent specified in rule 10.2.
10.2 | Extent of Vesting |
Where rule 10.1 applies, an Award will Vest to the extent that any Performance Condition has been met to the date of Vesting.
Unless the Designated Corporate Officer decides otherwise, the number of Shares in respect of which the Award Vests will be reduced on a pro-rata basis to reflect the fact that it is Vesting early.
10.3 | Exchange of Awards |
An Award will not Vest under rule 10.1.1 but will be exchanged to the extent that:
10.3.1 | an offer to exchange the Award is made and accepted by a Participant; or |
10.3.2 | the Designated Corporate Officer, with the consent of the Acquiring Company, decides before the Takeover that the Award will be automatically exchanged. |
Where an Award is exchanged, the Participant will be granted a new award in exchange for an existing Award. The new Award:
10.3.3 | must confer a right to acquire shares in the Acquiring Company or another body corporate determined by the Acquiring Company; |
10.3.4 | must be equivalent to the existing Award, subject to rule 10.3.6; |
10.3.5 | will be treated as having been acquired at the same time as the existing Award and, subject to rule 10.3.6, will Vest in the same manner and at the same time and be subject to the same Retention Period; |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
15
10.3.6 | must: |
(i) | be subject to a Performance Condition which is, so far as possible, equivalent to any Performance Condition applying to the existing Award; or |
(ii) | not be subject to any Performance Condition but be in respect of the number of shares which is equivalent to the number of Shares comprised in the existing Award which would have Vested under rule 10.2 |
10.3.7 | subject to these rules, will Vest as described in rule 6; |
10.3.8 | will be subject to such other terms as the Designated Corporate Officer considers appropriate in all the circumstances; and |
10.3.9 | will be governed by the Plan, excluding rule 11.2, as if references to Shares were references to the shares over which the new award is granted and references to the Company were references to the Acquiring Company or the body corporate determined under rule 10.3.3 above. |
10.4 | Effect on Options |
Where Awards Vest under rule 10.1, Options will lapse (unless exchanged), two months after the date of the event by virtue of which that rule applies.
11 | Changing the Plan |
11.1 | Designated Corporate Officers powers |
Except as described in the rest of this rule 11, the Designated Corporate Officer may at any time change the Plan, including the terms of any Award already granted, in any way.
11.2 | Shareholder approval |
11.2.1 | Except as described in rule 11.2.2, the Company in a general meeting must approve in advance by ordinary resolution any proposed change to the Plan to the advantage of present or future Participants, which relates to: |
(i) | eligibility; |
(ii) | the limits on the number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan; |
(iii) | the individual limit for each Participant under the Plan; |
(iv) | the basis for determining a Participants entitlement to, and the terms of, securities, cash or other benefit to be provided and for the adjustment thereof (if any) if there is a capitalisation issue, rights issue or open offer, sub-division or consolidation of shares or reduction of capital or any other variation of capital; or |
(v) | the terms of this rule 11.2.1. |
11.2.2 | The Designated Corporate Officer can change the Plan and need not obtain the approval of the Company in general meeting for any changes to a Performance Condition in accordance with rule 2.4 or for minor changes: |
(i) | to benefit the administration of the Plan; |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
16
(ii) | to comply with or take account of the provisions of any proposed or existing legislation; |
(iii) | to take account of any changes to legislation; or |
(iv) | to obtain or maintain favourable tax, exchange control or regulatory treatment of the Company, any Subsidiary or any present or future Participant. |
11.3 | Notice |
The Designated Corporate Officer is not required to give Participants notice of any changes.
12 | General |
12.1 | Terms of employment |
12.1.1 | This rule 12.1 applies during an employees employment and after the termination of an employees employment, whether or not the termination is lawful. |
12.1.2 | Nothing in the rules or the operation of the Plan forms part of the contract of employment of an employee. The rights and obligations arising from the employment relationship between the employee and his employer are separate from, and are not affected by, the Plan. Participation in the Plan does not create any right to, or expectation of, continued employment. |
12.1.3 | No employee has a right to participate in the Plan. Participation in the Plan or the grant of Awards on a particular basis in any year does not create any right to or expectation of participation in the Plan or the grant of Awards on the same basis, or at all, in any future year. |
12.1.4 | The terms of the Plan do not entitle the employee to the exercise of any discretion in his favour. |
12.1.5 | The employee will have no claim or right of action in respect of any decision, omission or discretion, which may operate to the disadvantage of the employee (including, without limitation, any action taken under rule 9 even if it is unreasonable, irrational or might otherwise be regarded as being in breach of the duty of trust and confidence (and/or any other implied duty) between the employee and his employer. |
12.1.6 | No employee has any right to compensation for any loss in relation to the Plan, including any loss in relation to: |
(i) | any loss or reduction of rights or expectations under the Plan in any circumstances (including lawful or unlawful termination of employment); |
(ii) | any exercise of a discretion or a decision taken in relation to an Award or to the Plan, or any failure to exercise a discretion or take a decision; |
(iii) | the operation, suspension, termination or amendment of the Plan. |
12.1.7 | Any duty or term implied by law which would affect the interpretation or operation of the Plan or any Award is expressly overridden. |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
17
12.1.8 | Employee shall for the purposes of this rule mean any employee of a member of the Group. |
12.2 | Tax |
The Participant will be responsible for all taxes, social security contributions and other liabilities arising out of or in connection with an Award or the acquisition, holding or disposal of Shares or any interest in them or any changes in the rights or restrictions attached to them. If the Grantor, any member of the Group or the trustee of any employee benefit trust has any liability to pay or account for any such tax or contribution, it may meet the liability by:
12.2.1 | selling Shares to which the Participant becomes entitled on his behalf and using the proceeds to meet the liability; |
12.2.2 | deducting the amount of the liability from any cash payment due under the Plan; |
12.2.3 | reducing the number of Shares to which the Participant would otherwise be entitled; and/or |
12.2.4 | deducting the amount from any payment of salary, bonus or other payment due to the Participant. |
The Participant will enter into any elections required by the Designated Corporate Officer, including elections under Part 7 of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 and/or elections to transfer any liability, or agreements to pay social security contributions.
12.3 | Designated Corporate Officers decision final and binding |
The decision of the Designated Corporate Officer on the interpretation of the Plan or in any dispute relating to an Award granted or matter relating to the Plan will be final and conclusive.
12.4 | Documents sent to shareholders |
The Company is not required to send to Participants copies of any documents or notices normally sent to the holders of its Shares.
12.5 | Costs |
The Company will pay the costs of introducing and administering the Plan. The Company may ask a Participants employer or any other member of the Group to bear the costs in respect of an Award to that Participant.
12.6 | Data protection |
By participating in the Plan the Participant consents to the holding and processing of personal information provided by the Participant to any member of the Group, trustee or third party service provider, for all purposes relating to the operation of the Plan. These include, but are not limited to:
12.6.1 | administering and maintaining Participant records; |
12.6.2 | providing information to members of the Group, trustees of any employee benefit trust, registrars, brokers or third party administrators of the Plan; |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
18
12.6.3 | providing information to future purchasers or merger partners of the Company, the Participants employing company, or the business in which the Participant works; |
12.6.4 | transferring information about the Participant to a country or territory that may not provide the same statutory protection for the information as the Participants home country. |
The Participant is entitled, on payment of a fee, to a copy of the personal information held about them. If anything is inaccurate the Participant has the right to have it corrected.
12.7 | Consents |
All allotments, issues and transfers of Shares will be subject to any necessary consents under any relevant enactments or regulations for the time being in force in any relevant country. The Participant is responsible for complying with any requirements he needs to fulfil in order to obtain or avoid the necessity for any such consent.
12.8 | Share rights |
Shares issued to satisfy Awards under the Plan will rank equally in all respects with the Shares in issue on the date of allotment. They will not rank for any rights attaching to Shares by reference to a record date preceding the date of allotment. Where Shares are transferred to a Participant, including a transfer out of treasury, the Participant will be entitled to all rights attaching to the Shares by reference to a record date on or after the transfer date. The Participant will not be entitled to rights before that date.
12.9 | Listing |
If and so long as the Shares are listed and traded on a public market, the Company will apply for listing of any Shares issued under the Plan as soon as practicable.
12.10 | Separate provisions |
Each of the provisions of these rules is entirely separate and independent from each of the other provisions. If any provision of any rule is found to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, in whole or in part, in relation to an Award or a Participant, the provision shall apply to that Award or Participant with whatever deletion or modification is necessary so that the provision is legal, valid and enforceable and gives effect to the commercial intention of the parties.
To the extent it is not possible to delete or modify the provision, in whole or in part then such provision or part of it will be deemed, to the extent that it is illegal, invalid or unenforceable, never to have been part of these rules in relation to that Award or that Participant and to the extent that it is possible to do so, this will not affect the validity or enforceability of any of the remaining provisions of that or any other rule.
12.11 | Notices |
12.11.1 | Any information or notice to a person who is or will be eligible to be a Participant under or in connection with the Plan may be posted, or sent by electronic means, in such manner to such address as the Company considers appropriate, including publication on any intranet. |
12.11.2 | Any information or notice to the Company or other duly appointed agent under or in connection with the Plan may be sent by post or transmitted to it at its registered office or such other place, and by such other means, as the Designated Corporate Officer or duly appointed agent may decide and notify to Participants. |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
19
12.11.3 | Notices sent by post will be deemed to have been given on the second day after the date of posting. However, notices sent by or to a Participant who is working overseas will be deemed to have been given on the seventh day after the date of posting. Notices sent by electronic means, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, will be deemed to have been received on the day after sending. |
12.12 | Governing law and jurisdiction |
English law governs the Plan and all Awards and their construction. The English courts have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of disputes arising under or in connection with the Plan or any Award.
13 | Sub-Plans |
13.1 | Designation of Sub-Plans |
The Designated Corporate Officer may designate any set of rules as a sub-plan (Sub-Plan) to the Plan. The rules of a Sub-Plan may be different to those of the Plan but must not be such as would require the approval of the Company in general meeting if the Plan were amended to include them under rule 11.2.
13.2 | Scope of Sub-Plans |
Subject to rule 13.1, the rules of a Sub-Plan can:
13.2.1 | set out how any discretion or power given under these rules will be exercised in relation to any or all awards under the Sub-Plan; |
13.2.2 | disapply any of the rules or apply additional rules; |
13.2.3 | set out circumstances in which rule 8.2 will apply in relation to the Award which are not listed in that rule or specify circumstances which are listed in that rule but which will not apply; |
13.3 | Further details |
In addition:
13.3.1 | A Sub-Plan may have been adopted before or after this Plan. |
13.3.2 | A Sub-Plan may be a Sub-Plan in relation to awards granted under it before or after it was designated as a Sub-Plan. |
13.3.3 | Awards under a Sub-Plan will be treated as Awards for the purposes of the limits on individual and overall participation in rule 4. |
13.3.4 | If there is a conflict between the rules of the Plan and the Sub-Plan, the Sub-Plan will prevail except to the extent that it would not comply with rule 13.1. Where there is a conflict between the Plan and the Sub-Plan in respect of Awards granted before the date of shareholder approval of the Plan then the Sub-Plan will apply even though it may not comply with rule 13.1. |
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
20
13.3.5 | For the avoidance of doubt, where the rules of the Sub-Plan are more restrictive than this Plan then the terms of that Sub-Plan shall to the exclusion of the Plan apply to the Awards made under it. |
13.3.6 | The Designated Corporate Officer may at any time decide that a Sub-Plan will cease to be a Sub-Plan. |
13.3.7 | Amendments to the Sub-Plan will be subject to rule 11.2. |
13.4 | Local Plans |
The Designated Corporate Officer may also, without obtaining the approval of the Company in general meeting, establish further plans (by way of schedules to the rules or otherwise) based on the rules, but modified to take account of local tax, exchange control or securities law in non-UK territories. However, any Shares made available under such plans are treated as counting against any limits on individual or overall participation in the Plan under rule 4.
A18820566/0.10/02 Mar 2015
21
Exhibit 7
Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges (unaudited)
$ million, except ratios | ||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings available for fixed charges: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations before adjustment for income or loss from joint ventures and associates (a) (b) |
(11,382 | ) | 1,578 | 27,032 | 14,196 | 32,545 | ||||||||||||||
Fixed charges |
2,689 | 2,924 | 3,021 | 2,971 | 2,808 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of capitalized interest |
298 | 327 | 226 | 145 | 44 | |||||||||||||||
Distributed income of joint ventures and associates |
1,614 | 1,911 | 1,391 | 1,763 | 5,040 | |||||||||||||||
Interest capitalized |
(179 | ) | (185 | ) | (238 | ) | (390 | ) | (349 | ) | ||||||||||
Preference dividend requirements, gross of tax |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Income of non-controlling interests not incurring fixed charges |
(25 | ) | (2 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total earnings available for fixed charges |
(6,987 | ) | 6,551 | 31,430 | 18,682 | 40,085 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Fixed charges: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expensed |
886 | 840 | 844 | 844 | 802 | |||||||||||||||
Interest capitalized |
179 | 185 | 238 | 390 | 349 | |||||||||||||||
Rental expense representative of interest |
1,622 | 1,897 | 1,937 | 1,734 | 1,654 | |||||||||||||||
Preference dividend requirements, gross of tax |
2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total fixed charges |
2,689 | 2,924 | 3,021 | 2,971 | 2,808 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges |
| 2.2 | 10.4 | 6.3 | 14.3 | |||||||||||||||
Deficiency of earnings to fixed charges |
(9,676 | ) | | | | |
(a) | 2015 includes a pre-tax charge of $11,956 million (2014 $819 million pre-tax charge, 2013 $469 million pre-tax charge, 2012 $5,014 million pre-tax charge and 2011 $3,742 million pre-tax credit) relating to the Gulf of Mexico oil spill. |
( b) | 2012 includes $709 million of dividends received from TNK-BP. |
1
Exhibit 12
EXHIBIT 12
Rule 13a14(a) Certificates
I, Robert Dudley, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of BP p.l.c.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
Date: 4 March 2016 |
/s/ Robert Dudley | |
Robert Dudley | ||
Group Chief Executive |
I, Brian Gilvary, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of BP p.l.c.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
Date: 4 March 2016 |
/s/ Brian Gilvary | |
Brian Gilvary | ||
Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 13
Rule 13a 14(b) Certificates
Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of BP p.l.c., a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the company ), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:
The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report ) of the company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
Date: 4 March 2016
/s/ Robert Dudley |
Robert Dudley |
Group Chief Executive |
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Certification
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)
Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of BP p.l.c., a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the company ), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:
The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the Report ) of the company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
Dated: 4 March 2016
/s/ Brian Gilvary |
Brian Gilvary |
Chief Financial Officer |
The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 15.1
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON
5001 S PRING V ALLEY R OAD
S UITE 800 E AST
D ALLAS , T EXAS 75244
This is a digital representation of a DeGolyer and MacNaughton report.
This file is intended to be a manifestation of certain data in the subject report and as such are subject to the same conditions thereof. The information and data contained in this file may be subject to misinterpretation; therefore, the signed and bound copy of this report should be considered the only authoritative source of such information.
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON
5001 S PRING V ALLEY R OAD
S UITE 800 E AST
D ALLAS , T EXAS 75244
March 2, 2016
BP p.l.c.
1 St. James Square
London, SW1Y 4PD
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We hereby consent to the reference to DeGolyer and MacNaughton contained in the section entitled Oil and gas disclosures for the group of the Annual Report and Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015, of BP p.l.c (the Form 20-F), as set forth under the heading Compliance, page 228, to the inclusion of our third-party report dated January 15, 2016, concerning our estimates of the net proved oil and condensate, natural gas liquids, and gas reserves, as of December 31, 2015, of certain properties owned by OAO NK Rosneft (Third-Party Report), which is included as an exhibit to the Form 20-F, and to the incorporation by reference of the reference to DeGolyer and MacNaughton in the Form 20-F and of the Third Party Report in the following Registration Statements:
Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File Nos. 333-208478 and 333-208478-01) of BP p.l.c. and BP Capital Markets p.l.c.; and
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-67206, 333-79399, 333-103924, 333-123482, 333-123483, 333-131583, 333-131584, 333-132619, 333-146868, 333-146870, 333-146873, 333-173136, 333-177423, 333-179406, 333-186462, 333-186463, 333-199015, 333-200794, 333-200795, 333-207188 and 333-207189) of BP p.l.c.
Very truly yours, |
/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton |
DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON |
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716 |
Exhibit 15.2
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON
5001 S PRING V ALLEY R OAD
S UITE 800 E AST
D ALLAS , T EXAS 75244
January 15, 2016
BP Russian Investments Limited
Chertsey Road
Sunbury on Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7BP
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Pursuant to the request of OAO NK Rosneft (Rosneft), we have estimated the net proved oil, condensate, natural gas liquids (NGL), and gas reserves, as of December 31, 2015, of certain properties owned by Rosneft. This evaluation was completed on January 15, 2016. At the request of BP Russian Investments Limited (BP), a wholly owned subsidiary of BP p.l.c., this report was prepared in accordance with guidelines specified in Item 1202(a)(8) of Regulation SK of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and is to be used for inclusion in certain SEC filings by BP p.l.c. The properties evaluated consist of working interests located in the Russian Federation, Algeria, Canada, Venezuela, and Vietnam. Rosneft has represented that it owns an interest in certain fields located in the Russian Federation either directly or through various subsidiary enterprises. Rosneft has represented that all fields are held at 100 percent by the respective subsidiary enterprise. Rosneft has represented that its ownership in all the subsidiary enterprises ranges between 16.67 and 100 percent.
Also included in this report are interests held through 3 production sharing agreements (PSA) and 10 joint ventures (JV). As represented by Rosneft, the PSA holdings include projects in Russia, Algeria, and Vietnam. The JV holdings include five in Russia, four in Venezuela, and one in Canada.
These subsidiary enterprises, the Rosneft direct holdings in the Russian Federation (including those in the Chechen Republic), the Russian PSA, the Algerian PSA, the Vietnam PSA, the Russian JVs, the Venezuela JVs, and the Canadian JV are collectively referred to hereinafter as Rosneft Holdings. BP has represented that it owns a 19.75-percent interest in Rosneft Holdings.
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 2 |
Rosneft has represented that these properties account for 100 percent of Rosnefts net proved reserves as of December 31, 2015. The net proved reserves estimates prepared by us have been prepared in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 410(a) (1)(32) of Regulation SX of the SEC.
Certain properties in which Rosneft has an interest are subject to the terms of various PSAs. The terms of these PSAs generally allow for working interest participants to be reimbursed for portions of capital costs and operating expenses and to share in the profits. The reimbursements and profit proceeds are converted to a barrel of oil equivalent or standard cubic foot of gas equivalent by dividing by product prices to determine the entitlement quantities. These entitlement quantities are equivalent in principle to net reserves and are used to calculate an equivalent net share, termed an entitlement interest. In this report, Rosneft net reserves or interest for certain properties subject to these PSAs is the entitlement based on Rosnefts working interest. For the Algerian PSA, the proved reserves were estimated to be zero.
The estimated reserves and associated values are reported herein at 100 percent for those subsidiaries of which Rosneft has majority control, either through direct ownership or through voting rights. The estimated reserves and values for those subsidiaries which Rosneft does not control are reported at Rosnefts ownership interest. All of the fields evaluated are located in the Russian Federation, Algeria, Canada, Venezuela, or Vietnam.
Rosneft has represented that the Russian Law on Subsoil provides for the extension of production licenses at the request of the license holder if there exists economic reserves upon the expiration of the primary term, provided the license holder is in material compliance with the terms of the existing license. We understand that the principal requirements for license extension are that the license holder complies with the material terms of the license and that mineral extraction has not been completed. As in the past, Rosneft is required to submit to the appropriate government agency for approval, prior to production, individual field development plans based on the economic life of the field and not based on the term of the associated license. Rosneft has represented that upon completion of the primary term of its current licenses, each of the subsidiary enterprises intends to continue to extend these licenses until the end of the economic life of the associated fields, and that they intend to proceed accordingly with development and operation of these fields. Based on these representations we have included as proved reserves those volumes that are estimated to be economically producible from the fields evaluated after the expiration of the primary term of their licenses.
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 3 |
Reserves included herein are expressed as net reserves owned or controlled by Rosneft (Rosneft net). Gross reserves are defined as the total estimated petroleum to be produced from these properties after December 31, 2015. Net reserves are defined as that portion of the gross reserves attributable to the interests owned by Rosneft after deducting all interests owned by others plus certain interests not owned by Rosneft, which Rosneft has represented that it controls. For the PSAs, these reserves are expressed in terms of the barrel equivalent of the cost recovery and profit share (entitlement) after deducting interests owned by others.
Data used in our estimates were obtained from Rosneft and public sources. In the preparation of this report we have relied, without independent verification, upon such information furnished by Rosneft with respect to ownership, production, current costs of operation and development, current prices for production, agreements relating to current and future operations and sale of production, and various other information and data that were accepted as represented. A field examination of the properties was not considered necessary for the purposes of this report.
Methodology and Procedures
Estimates of reserves were prepared by the use of appropriate geologic, petroleum engineering, and evaluation principles and techniques that are in accordance with practices generally recognized by the petroleum industry as presented in the publication of the Society of Petroleum Engineers entitled Standards Pertaining to the Estimating and Auditing of Oil and Gas Reserves Information (Revision as of February 19, 2007). The method or combination of methods used in the analysis of each reservoir was tempered by experience with similar reservoirs, stage of development, quality and completeness of basic data, and production history.
Based on the current stage of field development, production performance, the development plans provided by Rosneft, and the analyses of areas offsetting existing wells with test or production data, reserves were classified as proved.
The volumetric method was used to estimate the original oil in place (OOIP) and the original gas in place (OGIP). Structure and isopach maps were constructed to estimate reservoir volume. Electrical logs, radioactivity logs, core analyses, and other available data were used to prepare these maps as well as to estimate representative values for porosity and water saturation.
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 4 |
Estimates of ultimate recovery were obtained after applying recovery factors to OOIP or OGIP. These recovery factors were based on consideration of the type of energy inherent in the reservoirs, analyses of the petroleum, the structural positions of the properties, and the production histories. In certain cases, recovery factors were estimated by analogy with similar wells or reservoirs for which more complete data were available.
For the Vietnam fields, a Rosneft-supplied reservoir simulation model was reviewed and used to estimate recovery factors. In this case, an analysis of reservoir performance, including production rate, wellhead pressure, and gas-condensate ratio behavior, was used in the estimation of reserves.
For depletion-type reservoirs or those whose performance disclosed a reliable decline in producing-rate trends or other diagnostic characteristics, reserves were estimated by the application of appropriate decline curves. In the analyses of production-decline curves, reserves were estimated only to the limits of economic production or to the limit of the production licenses as appropriate.
Gas reserves estimated herein are reported as fuel gas, sales gas, and marketable gas volumes. Fuel gas is either that portion of the total volume of gas to be produced from the reservoirs used in the operation of the field, or in certain cases it represents the estimated volume of gas utilized in existing and future power-generation plants. Rosneft provided information about currently operating and future plants, including schedule of operation, plant inlet rates, fields associated with each plant, and pertinent economic parameters. Sales gas is defined as the total volume of gas to be produced from the reservoirs, measured at the point of delivery, available for sales, after deductions for various losses and usage. Sales gas is made up of associated gas, including gas-cap and solution gas from certain oil fields, and nonassociated gas from certain oil fields and the gas fields. Marketable gas is defined as the sum of fuel gas and sales gas. Gas reserves estimated herein are expressed at a temperature base of 20 degrees Centigrade (°C) and 1 atmosphere. Estimates of gas reserves are expressed herein in millions of cubic feet (10 6 ft 3 ).
Rosneft has represented that most of gas produced from the fields evaluated herein and located in the Unified gas supply system zone will be delivered to market through the Gazprom Gas Transmission System (GTS). In accordance with Russian Federation Resolution no. 858, dated July 14, 1997, Rosneft is entitled to access to the GTS for transportation and delivery of gas. Additionally, Russian Federation
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 5 |
Resolution no. 1021, dated December 29, 2000, obligates Gazprom and its affiliates to sell gas, produced by Gazprom and its affiliates, at a price within a range of wholesale prices regulated by the Federal Anti-Monopoly Service with adjustment for the energy value of the gas, and permits Gazprom to collect a service charge for retail distribution. The range of prices is established for each Russian region where the gas is sold. Rosneft has represented that all gas not used for fuel will be sold, whether at an agreed upon contract price or at the lower price associated with gas sales through the GTS. Sales gas reserves have been estimated herein on the basis of these representations. Rosneft provided sales gas prices to be used for the estimation of the value of the gas reserves reported herein, and it has represented that these prices are consistent with the conditions described above.
The fuel gas quantities included as a portion of Rosneft net marketable gas reserves are as follows, expressed in millions of cubic feet (10 6 ft 3 ):
Fuel Gas Portion
of Rosneft Net Marketable Gas Reserves (10 6 ft 3 ) |
||||
Proved |
||||
Developed |
2,055,761 | |||
Undeveloped |
1,189,846 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Proved |
3,245,607 |
Definition of Reserves
Petroleum reserves estimated by us and included in this report are classified as proved. Only proved reserves have been evaluated for this report. Reserves classifications used by us in this report are in accordance with the reserves definitions of Rules 410(a) (1)(32) of Regulation SX of the SEC. Reserves are judged to be economically producible in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions and assuming continuation of current regulatory practices using conventional production methods and equipment. In the analyses of production-decline curves, reserves were estimated only to the limit of economic rates of production under existing economic and operating conditions using prices and costs consistent with the effective date of this report, including consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements but not including escalations based upon future conditions. The petroleum reserves are classified as follows:
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 6 |
Proved oil and gas reserves Proved oil and gas reserves are those quantities of oil and gas, which, by analysis of geoscience and engineering data, can be estimated with reasonable certainty to be economically produciblefrom a given date forward, from known reservoirs, and under existing economic conditions, operating methods, and government regulationsprior to the time at which contracts providing the right to operate expire, unless evidence indicates that renewal is reasonably certain, regardless of whether deterministic or probabilistic methods are used for the estimation. The project to extract the hydrocarbons must have commenced or the operator must be reasonably certain that it will commence the project within a reasonable time.
(i) The area of the reservoir considered as proved includes: (A) The area identified by drilling and limited by fluid contacts, if any, and (B) Adjacent undrilled portions of the reservoir that can, with reasonable certainty, be judged to be continuous with it and to contain economically producible oil or gas on the basis of available geoscience and engineering data.
(ii) In the absence of data on fluid contacts, proved quantities in a reservoir are limited by the lowest known hydrocarbons (LKH) as seen in a well penetration unless geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establishes a lower contact with reasonable certainty.
(iii) Where direct observation from well penetrations has defined a highest known oil (HKO) elevation and the potential exists for an associated gas cap, proved oil reserves may be assigned in the structurally higher portions of the reservoir only if geoscience, engineering, or performance data and reliable technology establish the higher contact with reasonable certainty.
(iv) Reserves which can be produced economically through application of improved recovery techniques (including, but not limited to, fluid injection) are included in the proved classification when:
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 7 |
(A) Successful testing by a pilot project in an area of the reservoir with properties no more favorable than in the reservoir as a whole, the operation of an installed program in the reservoir or an analogous reservoir, or other evidence using reliable technology establishes the reasonable certainty of the engineering analysis on which the project or program was based; and (B) The project has been approved for development by all necessary parties and entities, including governmental entities.
(v) Existing economic conditions include prices and costs at which economic producibility from a reservoir is to be determined. The price shall be the average price during the 12-month period prior to the ending date of the period covered by the report, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions.
Developed oil and gas reserves Developed oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that can be expected to be recovered:
(i) Through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of the required equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and
(ii) Through installed extraction equipment and infrastructure operational at the time of the reserves estimate if the extraction is by means not involving a well.
Undeveloped oil and gas reserves Undeveloped oil and gas reserves are reserves of any category that are expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively major expenditure is required for recompletion.
(i) Reserves on undrilled acreage shall be limited to those directly offsetting development spacing areas that are reasonably certain of production when drilled, unless evidence using reliable technology exists that establishes reasonable certainty of economic producibility at greater distances.
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 8 |
(ii) Undrilled locations can be classified as having undeveloped reserves only if a development plan has been adopted indicating that they are scheduled to be drilled within five years, unless the specific circumstances justify a longer time.
(iii) Under no circumstances shall estimates for undeveloped reserves be attributable to any acreage for which an application of fluid injection or other improved recovery technique is contemplated, unless such techniques have been proved effective by actual projects in the same reservoir or an analogous reservoir, as defined in [section 210.410 (a) Definitions], or by other evidence using reliable technology establishing reasonable certainty.
Our estimates of Rosnefts net proved reserves attributable to the reviewed properties are based on the definitions of proved reserves of the SEC and are as follows, expressed in thousands of barrels (Mbbl) and millions of cubic feet (MMcf):
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 9 |
Rosneft Net Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||
Rosneft Holdings |
Reserves
Classification |
Oil and
Condensate (10 3 bbl) |
NGL
(10 3 bbl) |
Marketable
Gas (10 6 ft 3 ) |
Sales Gas
(10 6 ft 3 ) |
|||||||||||||
Russia |
Proved Developed | 14,392,360 | 161,655 | 25,377,937 | 23,322,317 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 9,905,541 | 77,173 | 31,249,477 | 30,059,878 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 24,297,901 | 238,828 | 56,627,414 | 53,382,195 | ||||||||||||||
Algeria |
Proved Developed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Canada |
Proved Developed | 817 | 285 | 2,542 | 2,401 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 120 | 44 | 565 | 318 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 937 | 329 | 3,107 | 2,719 | ||||||||||||||
Venezuela |
Proved Developed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 130,656 | 0 | 67,291 | 67,291 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 130,656 | 0 | 67,291 | 67,291 | ||||||||||||||
Vietnam |
Proved Developed | 401 | 0 | 110,429 | 110,429 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 401 | 0 | 110,429 | 110,429 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
Proved Developed | 14,393,578 | 161,940 | 25,490,908 | 23,435,147 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 10,036,317 | 77,217 | 31,317,333 | 30,127,487 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 24,429,895 | 239,157 | 56,808,241 | 53,562,634 |
Note: | Rosneft has represented that it controls the management of certain of the Rosneft Holdings in Russia through various subsidiary enterprises. For those Rosneft Holdings controlled by Rosneft, 100 percent of the reserves are reported herein as Rosneft net reserves and include those reserves not directly owned by Rosneft. |
In our opinion, the information relating to estimated proved reserves of oil, condensate, natural gas liquids, and gas contained in this report has been prepared in accordance with Paragraphs 932-235-50-4 and 932-235-50-6 through 932-235-50-9 of the Accounting Standards Update 932-235-50, Extractive Industries Oil and Gas (Topic 932): Oil and Gas Reserve Estimation and Disclosures (January 2010) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board and Rules 410(a) (1)(32) of Regulation SX and Rules 302(b), 1201, 1202(a) (1), (2), (3), (4), (8), and 1203(a) of Regulation SK of the Securities and Exchange Commission; provided, however, that estimates of proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves are not presented at the beginning of the year.
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 10 |
In connection with the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Securities and Exchange Commission standards and regulations, it should be noted that (i) estimates of the proved developed and proved undeveloped reserves are not presented at the beginning of the year, (ii) certain proved undeveloped reserves are scheduled for development more than 5 years in the future, and (iii) certain economically producible quantities of reserves beyond the primary term of the current production licenses have been classified as proved reserves in this report based on Rosnefts representation that each of the subsidiary enterprises discussed therein has the ability to and intends to extend the applicable current production licenses to the end of the economic life of the associated fields and that Rosneft believes with reasonable certainty that the inclusion of the reserves and revenue under extended license terms is consistent with SEC regulations. We believe it is reasonable therefore to include these quantities as SEC proved reserves for the reasons discussed herein.
To the extent the above-enumerated rules, regulations, and statements require determinations of an accounting or legal nature, we, as engineers, are necessarily unable to express an opinion as to whether the above-described information is in accordance therewith or sufficient therefor.
We are not in a position to offer an opinion on the duration of the subsidiary enterprises production licenses under the Russian Law on Subsoil, but, in light of the above, believe Rosnefts view on the probability of license extensions to be reasonable, although such view may not be confirmed by the SEC. We believe it is reasonable therefore to include these quantities as SEC proved reserves.
Rosneft has represented to us that the Russian Law on Subsoil requires that an operator develop a field according to a development plan that has been submitted to and approved by the appropriate government authority. Once approved, failure to follow the development plan is a violation of the Russian Law on Subsoil and may result in the cancellation of the operators production license for the field. Since the implementation of the approved development plan, including that portion that may occur more than 5 years in the future, is a requirement for maintaining the production license, we have included in certain of our estimates of SEC proved reserves those quantities associated with development activities that are part of the approved development plan and scheduled more than 5 years in the future. We believe that since they must be developed to prevent the loss of licenses that there is reasonable certainty that the reserves will be developed. We believe it is reasonable therefore to include these quantities as SEC proved reserves. Rosneft has
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 11 |
represented to us that the development plans provided to us are in accordance with the approved development plans. We cannot render an opinion regarding the actual possibility that a license will be terminated for failure to follow approved development plans nor an opinion on how many companies have lost their licenses for not following approved development plans.
Our estimates of Rosnefts net proved reserves attributable to the reviewed properties, adjusted for BPs ownership interest of 19.75 percent, are as follows, expressed in thousands of barrels (Mbbl) and millions of cubic feet (MMcf):
Rosneft Net Reserves Adjusted for BP 19.75-Percent Share | ||||||||||||||||||
Rosneft Holdings |
Reserves
Classification |
Oil and
Condensate (10 3 bbl) |
NGL
(10 3 bbl) |
Marketable
Gas (10 6 ft 3 ) |
Sales Gas
(10 6 ft 3 ) |
|||||||||||||
Russia |
Proved Developed | 2,842,491 | 31,927 | 5,012,143 | 4,606,158 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 1,956,344 | 15,242 | 6,171,772 | 5,936,826 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 4,798,835 | 47,169 | 11,183,915 | 10,542,984 | ||||||||||||||
Algeria |
Proved Developed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
Canada |
Proved Developed | 161 | 56 | 502 | 474 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 24 | 9 | 112 | 63 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 185 | 65 | 614 | 537 | ||||||||||||||
Venezuela |
Proved Developed | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 25,805 | 0 | 13,290 | 13,290 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 25,805 | 0 | 13,290 | 13,290 | ||||||||||||||
Vietnam |
Proved Developed | 79 | 0 | 21,810 | 21,810 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 79 | 0 | 21,810 | 21,810 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
Proved Developed | 2,842,731 | 31,983 | 5,034,455 | 4,628,442 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 1,982,173 | 15,251 | 6,185,174 | 5,950,179 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 4,824,904 | 47,234 | 11,219,629 | 10,578,621 |
For one of the Rosneft subsidiary enterprises in Russia, BP has represented that it holds a direct ownership interest in that subsidiary. This direct ownership asset is referred to hereinafter as BP Holdings.
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 12 |
Our estimates of BP Holdings net proved reserves attributable to the reviewed properties are as follows, expressed in thousands of barrels (10 3 bbl) and millions of cubic feet (10 6 ft 3 ):
BP Net Reserves | ||||||||||||||||||
BP Holdings |
Reserves Classification |
Oil and
Condensate (10 3 bbl) |
NGL
(10 3 bbl) |
Marketable
Gas (10 6 ft 3 ) |
Sales
Gas (10 6 ft 3 ) |
|||||||||||||
Russia | Proved Developed | 3,435 | 0 | 658 | 658 | |||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped | 24,203 | 0 | 4,431 | 4,431 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Proved | 27,638 | 0 | 5,089 | 5,089 |
Note: The BP net reserves shown above are included in the Rosneft net reserves shown on page 8 herein.
Primary Economic Assumptions
The following economic assumptions were used for estimating existing and future prices and costs, expressed in United States dollars (U.S.$):
Oil and Condensate Prices
Rosneft has represented that the sales prices of oil and condensate were based on a 12-month average price (reference price), calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements. Rosneft supplied oil, condensate, and gas prices, which are based on a Urals reference price of R23,535 per metric ton (U.S.$53.15 per barrel). The Urals reference oil price is an average of the Urals (MED) and Urals (Rdam) prices as published in the Platts Oilgram Price Report. For the Rosneft Holdings in the Russian Federation (including those in both the Chechen Republic and the Russian PSA), the volume-weighted average oil and condensate prices over the life of the properties were U.S.$35.85 per barrel and U.S.$32.81 per barrel, respectively. For the JV holding in Canada, Rosneft supplied differentials to an Edmonton Light Oil reference price of U.S.$43.28 per barrel and the prices were held constant thereafter. The average oil price over the life of the properties in the Canadian JV was
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 13 |
U.S.$43.28 per barrel. For the JV holdings in Venezuela, Rosneft has represented that the oil reference price of U.S.$54.11 per barrel was used. Rosneft provided differentials to the reference price for each of the Venezuelan fields. Prices were held constant. The volume-weighted average price for the Venezuelan holdings was U.S.$42.42 per barrel. For the PSA holdings in Vietnam, Rosneft has represented that the condensate reference price of U.S.$54.11 per barrel was used. The realized price of the condensate for the Vietnam holdings was U.S.$51.33 per barrel.
NGL Prices
Rosneft has represented that the NGL prices were based on a reference price, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements. For the Rosneft Holdings in the Russian Federation (including those in both the Chechen Republic), the volume-weighted average NGL price over the life of the properties was U.S.$11.15 per barrel. For the JV holding in Canada, Rosneft supplied NGL price average of U.S.$18.46 per barrel and the prices were held constant thereafter. The average NGL price over the life of the Canadian properties was U.S.$18.46 per barrel.
Gas Prices
Rosneft has represented that the gas prices were based on a reference price, calculated as the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within the 12-month period prior to the end of the reporting period, unless prices are defined by contractual arrangements. For the Rosneft Holdings in the Russian Federation (including those in both the Chechen Republic and the Russian PSA), the volume-weighted average price over the life of the properties was U.S.$0.91 per thousand cubic feet (Mcf). For the JV holding in Canada, Rosneft supplied differentials to an
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 14 |
Alberta Export Canadian metering outlet (AECO) reference price of U.S.$2.00 per Mcf and the prices were held constant thereafter. The average gas price over the life of the properties in the Canadian JV was U.S.$2.00 per Mcf. For the Petromonagas field in Venezuela, Rosneft supplied a domestic gas reference price of U.S.$0.97 per Mcf, which was held constant for the life of the property. For the PSA holdings in Vietnam, Rosneft has represented that sales gas is priced according to terms of a Gas Sales Agreement and the average price is U.S.$2.89 per Mcf.
Expenses and Costs
Current expenses and costs, and forecasts of expenses and costs provided by Rosneft were used in estimating future expenditures required to operate the fields. In certain cases, future expenditures, either higher or lower than current expenditures, were used because of anticipated changes in operating conditions, but no general escalation that might result from inflation was applied.
Estimates of oil, condensate, natural gas liquids, and gas reserves should be regarded only as estimates that may change as further production history and additional information become available. Not only are such reserves estimates based on that information which is currently available, but such estimates are also subject to the uncertainties inherent in the application of judgmental factors in interpreting such information.
While the oil and gas industry may be subject to regulatory changes from time to time that could affect an industry participants ability to recover its oil and gas reserves, we are not aware of any such governmental actions which would restrict the recovery of the December 31, 2015, estimated oil and gas volumes.
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON | 15 |
DeGolyer and MacNaughton is an independent petroleum engineering consulting firm that has been providing petroleum consulting services throughout the world since 1936. DeGolyer and MacNaughton does not have any financial interest, including stock ownership, in Rosneft or BP. Our fees were not contingent on the results of our evaluation. This letter report has been prepared at the request of BP. DeGolyer and MacNaughton has used all methods and procedures as it considered necessary under the circumstances to prepare this report. All assumptions, data, procedures, and methods used to prepare this report are considered by DeGolyer and MacNaughton to be appropriate for the purpose served by this report.
Submitted, |
||||||
/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughton |
||||||
DeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON |
||||||
Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-716 |
||||||
/s/ Gary L. McKenzie, P.E. |
||||||
Gary L. McKenzie, P.E. | ||||||
[SEAL] |
Senior Vice President | |||||
DeGolyer and MacNaughton |
D E G OLYER AND M AC N AUGHTON |
CERTIFICATE of QUALIFICATION
I, Gary L. McKenzie, Petroleum Engineer with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, 5001 Spring Valley Road, Suite 800 East, Dallas, Texas, 75244 U.S.A., hereby certify:
1. | That I am a Senior Vice President with DeGolyer and MacNaughton, which company did prepare the letter report addressed to BP dated January 15, 2016, and that I, as Senior Vice President, was responsible for the preparation of this report. |
2. | That I attended the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, and that I graduated with a Bachelor of Science degree in 1976; that I am a Registered Professional Engineer in the State of Texas; that I am a member of the International Society of Petroleum Engineers and the Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers; and that I have in excess of 34 years of experience in oil and gas reservoir studies and reserves evaluations. |
/s/ Gary L. McKenzie, P.E. |
||
Gary L. McKenzie, P.E. | ||
[SEAL] |
Senior Vice President | |
DeGolyer and MacNaughton |
Exhibit 15.4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
In re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig |
* | MDL No. 2179 | ||
Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf |
* | |||
of Mexico, on April 20, 2010 |
* | |||
. |
* | SECTION: J | ||
* | JUDGE BARBIER | |||
This Document Relates to: |
* | |||
Nos. 10-4536, 10-04182, 10-03059, |
* | |||
13-4677, 13-158, 13-00123 |
* | MAGISTRATE JUDGE | ||
* | SHUSHAN | |||
* | ||||
* * * * * * * * * * * * * |
* |
CONSENT DECREE AMONG DEFENDANT BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC.
(BPXP), THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND THE STATES OF
ALABAMA, FLORIDA, LOUISIANA, MISSISSIPPI, AND TEXAS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Appendix 1: |
List of Designated Natural Resource Damages Trustees | |||
Appendix 2: |
Agreement Among the United States and the Gulf States Relating to Natural Resource Restoration | |||
Appendix 3: |
Indemnified Parties | |||
Appendix 4: |
Administrative Agreement | |||
Appendix 5: |
Plea Agreement | |||
Appendix 6: |
Redacted Implementation Plan | |||
Appendix 7: |
List of BP Entities | |||
Appendix 8: |
BP Corporation North America Inc. Guaranty | |||
Appendix 9: |
BP p.l.c. Guaranty | |||
Appendix 10: |
Schedule of Submissions to DOJ ENRD Under Paragraph 37 | |||
Appendix 11: |
Documents to be Publicly Posted by BPXP Pursuant to Paragraph 38 |
ii
A. This Consent Decree addresses civil claims arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident asserted by the United States and/or the Gulf States (Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas) against BPXP and BP Entities, including claims for civil penalties , natural resource damages, response costs, and other damages. The Gulf States and BPXP have also entered into a separate settlement agreement addressing economic damages and other claims arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident asserted by each Gulf State against BP Entities (Settlement Agreement).
B. The United States of America filed a complaint on December 15, 2010, captioned United States v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al. , No. 10-4536 in MDL 2179 (E.D. La.), relating to the Deepwater Horizon Incident alleging, among other things, that BPXP violated the CWA and is liable without limitation under OPA for removal costs and damages, including for, inter alia , injuries to, destruction of, loss of, or loss of use of natural resources and net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, fees, and net profit shares due to the injury to, destruction of, and loss of real property, personal property, and natural resources.
C. The State of Alabama filed a first amended complaint on April 7, 2011, captioned State of Alabama v. BP p.l.c. , Case No. 2:10-CV-04182 (E.D. La.), that was transferred to MDL 2179 (E.D. La.). Alabamas complaint alleges, among other things, that BPXP and certain other BP Entities violated the Alabama Water Pollution Control Act, Ala. Code § 22-22-1 et seq ., the Alabama Air Pollution Control Act, Ala. Code § 22-28-1 et seq ., the Alabama Hazardous Wastes Management Act, Ala. Code § 22-30-1 et seq ., and the Alabama Solid Waste and Recyclable Materials Management Act, Ala. Code § 22-27-1 et seq. , and therefore are liable for civil penalties under those statutes. Alabamas amended complaint also sought costs associated with oil spill response actions, punitive damages and compensatory damages, including, without limitation, damages to natural resources and State properties, lost tax, and other revenues, under the Alabama Water Pollution Control Act, OPA, general maritime law, and common law.
1
D. The State of Louisiana filed a first amended complaint on April 19, 2011, captioned State of Louisiana v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. , Case Nos. 11-cv-0516 and 10-cv-03059 in MDL 2179 (E.D. La.). Louisianas amended complaint alleges, among other things, that BPXP and certain other BP Entities violated the Louisiana Environmental Quality Act/Water Control Law, La. R.S. § 30:2011 et seq ., § 30:2071 et seq ., and are therefore liable for civil penalties under that statute. Louisianas amended complaint also sought costs associated with oil spill response actions and damages, including, without limitation, damages to natural resources, State property, costs of increased public services, and lost revenues, pursuant to OPA, and the Louisiana Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act, La. R.S. § 30:2451 et seq.
E. The State of Texas filed a complaint on May 17, 2013, captioned State of Texas v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., Case No. 1:13-cv-315 (E.D. Tex.), that was transferred to MDL 2179, where Texas filed an amended complaint on June 18, 2013, captioned State of Texas v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., Case No. 13-cv-4677 (E.D. La.). Texas amended complaint alleges, among other things, that BPXP, certain other BP Entities, and other parties are liable for civil penalties under Texas Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act, Tex. Nat. Res. Code § 40.001 et seq ., and the Texas Water Code, Tex. Water Code § 26.001 et seq . Texas amended complaint also sought cost recovery and damages, including, without limitation, for injury to natural resources, lost tax revenues, lost state park revenues, and other economic damages, under OPA, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq ., Texas Oil Spill Prevention and Response Act, Tex. Nat. Res. Code § 40.001 et seq ., and the Texas Water Code, Tex. Water Code § 26.001 et seq .
2
F. The State of Mississippi filed a complaint on April 18, 2013, captioned Hood v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. , Case No. 1:13-cv-00158 (S.D. Miss.), that was transferred to MDL 2179 (E.D. La.) on May 9, 2013. Mississippis complaint alleges, among other things, that BPXP, certain other BP Entities, and other parties are liable for damages to the State, including for injury to natural resources, economic losses, and costs of providing increased public services under OPA and general maritime law, and for punitive damages under general maritime law. The State of Mississippi filed an additional complaint in the Circuit Court for the First Judicial District of Harrison County, Mississippi, on April 19, 2013, captioned Hood v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. , bearing case number A2401-13-93 on the docket of said court. The aforesaid action was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Case No. 1:13-cv-00206 on May 3, 2013, and was transferred to MDL 2179 (E.D. La.) on May 20, 2013. Mississippis additional complaint alleges, among other things, that BPXP, certain other BP Entities, and other parties violated the common law, Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law, Miss. Code Ann. § 49-17-1 et seq ., the Antiquities Law of Mississippi, Miss. Code Ann. § 39-7-1 et seq ., the Solid Waste Disposal Law of 1974, Miss. Code Ann. § 17-17-1 et seq ., and Miss. Code Ann. § 29-1-19, and therefore are liable for civil penalties under those statutes. Mississippis additional complaint also sought costs associated with economic, compensatory, and punitive damages, including, without limitation, damages to natural resources and State properties, and lost tax and other revenues under Mississippi law.
G. The State of Florida filed a first amended complaint on April 20, 2013, captioned State of Florida v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. , Case No. 5:13-cv-00123 (N.D. Fla.), that was transferred to MDL 2179 (E.D. La.). Floridas amended complaint alleges, among other things, that BPXP and certain other BP Entities are liable for damages, including, but not
3
limited to, loss of taxes, under OPA, common law, and general maritime law, and punitive damages under general maritime law and Florida law. The Trustees for the natural resources of the State of Florida filed a complaint on March 5, 2014, captioned Vinyard et al. v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al. , Case. No. 3:14-cv-00112 (N.D. Fla.), that was transferred to MDL 2179 (E.D. La.) on March 24, 2014. The Trustees for the State of Floridas complaint alleges, among other things, that BPXP and certain other BP Entities are liable for removal costs and natural resource damages under OPA .
H. On February 22, 2012, the Court entered an order granting partial summary judgment and finding BPXP liable for civil penalties under Section 311(b)(7) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(b)(7), in an amount to be determined by the Court. In the same order, the Court issued a declaratory judgment against BPXP, holding BPXP jointly and severally liable for removal costs and damages under Section 1002 of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2702. See In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico , on April 20, 2010, 844 F. Supp. 2d 746 (E.D. La. 2012), affd in part sub nom. In re Deepwater Horizon, 753 F.3d 570 (5th Cir. 2014), rehearing en banc denied 775 F.3d 741 (5th Cir. 2015), cert. denied 135 S. Ct. 2893 (2015).
I. On November 14, 2011, the Court entered an order dismissing Alabamas and Louisianas claims under state law, including for civil penalties, as being preempted by federal law. In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010 , No. 10-3059, 2011 WL 5520295 (E.D. La. Nov. 14, 2011).
J. On October 12, 2011 and December 7, 2011, the DOI, on behalf of BSEE issued BPXP notifications of incidents of noncompliance, alleging, among other things, violations of the OCSLA, 43 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq., and its implementing regulations 30 C.F.R. Part 250, Subparts A, C, D, and Q. The alleged violations occurred while BPXP and its contractors
4
conducted drilling and temporary abandonment procedures at the Macondo Well. BPXP filed administrative appeals of the incidents of noncompliance with the IBLA (IBLA 2012-0050 and IBLA 2012-0085), which appeals have been stayed pending resolution of this action. Subject to the right to an appeal, BSEE has authority to assess civil penalties for incidents of noncompliance, as well as seek other appropriate relief, pursuant to 43 U.S.C. § 1350(b)(1) & (b)(2).
K. On July 15, 2010, the DOI, on behalf of the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement, issued a letter regarding BPXPs obligations pursuant to OCSLA and the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act, 30 U.S.C. § 1756. BPXP filed an administrative appeal of this letter to the IBLA (IBLA 2010-0236), which appeal has been suspended.
L. The U.S. Coast Guard, NOAA, DOI, EPA, USDA, and other federal agencies have incurred costs, including response, removal, and natural resource damages assessment costs, as a result of the discharges of oil into the waters of the United States relating to the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
M. Each of the Gulf States, including their respective State Trustees, has incurred costs, including response, removal, and natural resource damages assessment costs, as a result of the discharges of oil into the waters of the United States and/or the Gulf States relating to the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
N. On January 30, 2013, the Court in U.S. v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. , Case No. 2:12-cr-00292 (E.D. La.) approved a criminal Plea Agreement between the United States and BPXP pursuant to which BPXP pled guilty to an information charging it with eleven counts of violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1115 (Misconduct or Neglect of Ship Officers), one count of
5
violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1505 (Obstruction of Congress), one misdemeanor count of a violation of 33 U.S.C. §§ 1319(e)(1)(A) and 1321(b)(3) (CWA), and one misdemeanor count of a violation of 16 U.S.C. §§ 703 and 707(a) (Migratory Bird Treaty Act), relating to the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
O. On November 28, 2012, EPA issued a notice of suspension to BP p.l.c., BP America, Inc., BPXP, and other BP Entities from participating in federal contracts and other covered transactions. On February 1, 2013, EPA issued a notice of statutory disqualification to BPXP stating that BPXP cannot receive federal contracts or benefits if any part of the work will be performed at its Houston headquarters.
P. On March 13, 2014, BP p.l.c., BPCNA, BPXP, and certain other BP Entities entered into an Administrative Agreement with EPA to resolve all suspension and debarment matters arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident. The Administrative Agreement incorporates requirements of both the Plea Agreement and a Securities and Exchange Commission Judgment Order entered against BP p.l.c. on December 10, 2012 ( Securities and Exchange Commn v. BP p.l.c. , Case No. 2:12-cv-02774 (E.D. La.)).
Q. Trial has concluded on the United States CWA claims, No. 10-4536. After the first phase of trial, on September 9, 2014, the Court issued its amended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law finding that the discharge of oil was the result of BPXPs gross negligence and willful misconduct within the meaning of Section 311(b)(7)(D) of the CWA. See In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010 , 21 F. Supp. 3d 657 (E.D. La. 2014). BPXP has disputed and appealed this decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
6
R. After the second phase of trial, on January 15, 2015, the Court issued its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law with respect to the Phase Two Trial (Doc. No. 14021), finding, inter alia , that 4.0 million barrels of oil were released from the Macondo Reservoir (Rec. Doc. 14021 ¶ 273); and that, for purposes of calculating the maximum civil penalty under the CWA, 3.19 million barrels of oil discharged into the Gulf of Mexico.
S. The Court conducted the third phase of the trial regarding the United States civil penalty claim filed under the CWA between January 20 and February 2, 2015. The Court has not yet issued its findings of fact or conclusions of law regarding this third phase of the CWA trial.
T. The Parties agree, and the Court by entering this Consent Decree finds, that this Consent Decree, (i) has been negotiated at arms length, in good faith, and will limit, avoid and resolve litigation between the Parties, and (ii) is fair, reasonable, and furthers the objectives of the statutes listed in the covenants not to sue.
NOW, THEREFORE, without further adjudication, findings or admissions of any issue of fact or law in connection with the Deepwater Horizon Incident, other than those expressly set forth in this Consent Decree, and with the consent of the Parties,
IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED, ORDERED, AND DECREED as follows:
I. | JURISDICTION AND VENUE |
1. Jurisdiction . This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action, pursuant to, inter alia , 33 U.S.C. §§ 1321(b), 1327, and 2717(b) and 28 U.S.C. §§ 1327, 1331, 1333, 1345, and 1355, and over the Parties for the purposes of the entry and enforcement of this Consent Decree.
2. Venue . Venue lies in the Eastern District of Louisiana pursuant to, inter alia , 33 U.S.C. §§ 2717(b) and 1321(b)(7)(E), and 28 U.S.C. §§ 98(a),1391, and 1395.
7
3. Findings Regarding Jurisdiction and Venue .
a. Solely for purposes of this Consent Decree or any action to enforce this Consent Decree, the Court finds and the Parties acknowledge and agree that: (a) the Court has exclusive jurisdiction over this Consent Decree and any action to enforce it; and (b) venue is proper in the Eastern District of Louisiana.
b. This Court finds and the Parties agree that the Court has authority to enter this Order as to all claims addressed herein, including those transferred to MDL 2179 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407.
4. Retention of Jurisdiction . Consistent with the terms of this Consent Decree, including its Appendices, the Court shall retain jurisdiction over this case for the purpose of resolving disputes arising under this Consent Decree and effectuating or enforcing compliance with the terms of this Consent Decree.
II. | APPLICABILITY |
5. Persons Bound . The obligations of this Consent Decree apply to and are binding upon the United States, each of the Gulf States, and BPXP and, for the limited purposes set forth in Paragraph 6, BP p.l.c. and BPCNA, and each of their successors, assigns, or other entities or persons otherwise bound by law to comply with this Consent Decree.
6. Participation of BP p.l.c. and BPCNA . BP p.l.c. and BPCNA are entering into this Consent Decree for the limited purpose of guaranteeing the payment obligations of BPXP, providing financial assurance, and granting and receiving covenants not to sue, as set forth in this Consent Decree.
8
7. Liability of Successors and Assigns .
a. Any legal successor or assign of BPXP, BPCNA, or BP p.l.c. shall be liable for the payment and other performance obligations of BPXP, BPCNA, or BP p.l.c., as applicable hereunder, and an agreement to be so liable shall be included by BPXP, BPCNA, or BP p.l.c., as applicable, in the terms of any sale, acquisition, or merger of BPXP, BPCNA, or BP p.l.c., as applicable, with appropriate terms for the retention or transfer of financial assurances for BPXPs payment obligations under the Consent Decree.
b. No change in the ownership or control of BPXP, BPCNA, or BP p.l.c. shall alter the obligations of BPCNA or BP p.l.c. as guarantors without the express written agreement of the United States and the Gulf States.
c. In the event of the sale, assignment, or transfer of some but not all of BPXPs assets to an unaffiliated third party pursuant to an arms-length transaction, such third party shall not be liable for BPXPs obligations under this Consent Decree.
III. | DEFINITIONS |
8. Terms Defined in Statute or Regulation . Capitalized terms used in this Consent Decree that are defined in the CWA, OPA, or the OCSLA, or in regulations promulgated pursuant to the CWA, OPA, or OCSLA, shall have the meanings assigned to them in such law or regulations, unless otherwise provided in this Consent Decree. In the case of a conflict between a defined term in this Consent Decree and any such term in OPA, CWA, OSCLA, or other law, the Consent Decree shall govern.
9. Terms Defined in this Consent Decree . For purposes of this Consent Decree, whenever the terms set forth below are used, the following definitions shall apply:
a. Act of Insolvency means any one of the following: the presentation of a winding-up petition in respect of BP p.l.c., the making of an application for an administration order in respect of BP p.l.c., an application to court for an order convening meetings of creditors of BP p.l.c. to consider a scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act 2006 that would
9
materially alter the United States or any Gulf States rights against BP p.l.c. under this Consent Decree, the summoning of meetings of the creditors of BP p.l.c. (including the United States and the Gulf States) to consider a proposal for a company voluntary arrangement or other composition under the Insolvency Act 1986 that would materially alter the United States or any Gulf States rights against BP p.l.c. under this Consent Decree, or the appointment of an administrative receiver, administrator, or liquidator in respect of BP p.l.c. If in the case of a petition presented or application made by a creditor, contributory or other third party, such petition or application is stayed, dismissed, or withdrawn within 60 Days of its filing, such a petition or application shall not constitute an Act of Insolvency. For the purposes of this Paragraph, the term materially alter means an alteration to the United States or any Gulf States rights against BP p.l.c. under the Consent Decree which reduces the amounts owed or payable, or extends the time at which payments are to be made, to the United States or any Gulf State or is otherwise materially prejudicial to the United States or any Gulf State.
b. Administrative Agreement means the agreement reached on March 13, 2014, between BP p.l.c., BPCNA, BPXP, and certain other BP Entities and the EPA, as amended, to resolve all suspension and debarment matters arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident and which is attached as Appendix 4 to this Consent Decree.
c. BP Entity or BP Entities means one or more of the following: BP p.l.c., BPCNA, and BPXP, and any parents, subsidiaries, successors, assigns, and all entities identified in Appendix 7 to this Consent Decree, and, for each of the preceding, all of their current, future, and former officers, directors, and employees in their official capacities.
d. BP p.l.c. means BP p.l.c., a company incorporated in England whose registered office is at 1 St. Jamess Square, London, SW1Y 4PD, England.
10
e. BPCNA means BP Corporation North America Inc., incorporated in the State of Indiana, with its current principal place of business in Houston, Texas.
f. BPXP means BP Exploration & Production Inc., incorporated in the State of Delaware, with its current principal place of business in Houston, Texas.
g. BSEE means the the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement in the Department of the Interior.
h. Change of Control means change of control of BP p.l.c. in the form of a takeover bid, tender offer or other merger transaction (however effected), that has become unconditional in all respects or otherwise effective, under which a third party or group of parties acting together acquires such number of shares in BP p.l.c. (or an interest in such shares) so as to carry more than 50% of the voting rights in BP p.l.c.
i. Consent Decree means this Consent Decree, including all its appendices.
j. Court means the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
k. CWA means the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1388.
l. Date of Lodging means the date upon which the United States submits this Consent Decree to the Court, prior to soliciting public comment on the Consent Decree or the PDARP.
m. Day means a calendar day unless expressly stated to be a business day. In computing any period of time under this Consent Decree, where the last day would fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday, the period shall run until 5 p.m. Central Time of the next business day.
11
n. Deepwater Horizon means the mobile offshore drilling unit Deepwater Horizon , including its engines, gear, tackle, apparel, riser, and appurtenances.
o. Deepwater Horizon Incident means (1) all discharges of hydrocarbons or other substances from the Macondo Well, including discharges from, through, or into the Deepwater Horizon , occurring on or after April 20, 2010, but prior to the Date of Lodging of the Consent Decree, regardless of any subsequent movement, migration, resuspension, or resurfacing of such hydrocarbons or other substances; (2) the installation, drilling, construction and blowout of the Macondo Well; (3) the explosion and fire on the Deepwater Horizon ; (4) the loss of the Deepwater Horizon ; (5) containment efforts related to the Macondo Well; (6) construction of the relief wells within the meaning of the Macondo Well; and (7) cleanup, removal, and remediation efforts, and all other response or restoration actions, including the application of dispersants, in connection with the foregoing events.
p. Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill NRD Fund means the incident-specific subaccount within the NRDAR Fund established for the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
q. DOI means the U.S. Department of the Interior.
r. DOJ ENRD means the U.S. Department of Justices Environment and Natural Resources Division.
s. Effective Date means the date upon which the Court enters this Consent Decree.
t. EFT means a FedWire Electronic Funds Transfer.
u. EPA means the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
12
v. Exhibit B means Exhibit B to the Plea Agreement made enforceable by the Order of Special Conditions of Probation. A copy of Exhibit B is attached to Appendix 5 to this Consent Decree.
w. Federal Trustees means any and all federal officials designated by the President under Section 1006(b)(2) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2706(b)(2), or authorized under any other applicable law, to act as trustees on behalf of the public for Natural Resources in connection with the Deepwater Horizon Incident, including the Secretary of Commerce, the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, and the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and their respective delegates.
x. Framework Agreement means the agreement between BPXP, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas titled the Framework for Early Restoration Addressing Injuries Resulting from the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill , dated April 20, 2011.
y. Gulf State or Gulf States means one or more of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas.
z. IBLA means the Interior Board of Land Appeals in the Department of the Interior.
aa. Implementation Plan means the detailed implementation plan required by paragraph 32 of Exhibit B. The approved Implementation Plan, redacted to remove certain information in conformance with the standard provided by Paragraph 39.b., is attached as Appendix 6 to this Consent Decree.
bb. Indemnified Parties means those entities identified in Appendix 3 and any indemnified related parties with whom any of the BP Entities has entered into agreements to indemnify, hold harmless, or reimburse the party with respect to U.S. Covered Matters or State Covered Matters, prior to July 2, 2015.
13
cc. Macondo Well means (a) Macondo Well 1 (including MC-252#1, Well No. 001ST00BP00, MC-252#1 ST1, Well No. 001ST00BP01), Macondo Well 2 (including MC-252#2, Well No. 003ST00BP00), and Macondo Well 3 (including MC-252#3, Well No. 002ST00BP00) within Block 252, Mississippi Canyon, OCS Official Protraction Diagram, NH 16 16-10 existing on or before the Date of Lodging of the Consent Decree; (b) the Deepwater Horizon ; (c) a coffer dam used in the course of removal work conducted during the discharge of oil from Block 252 of the Mississippi Canyon that began April 20, 2010; (d) the Macondo Well as defined in the United States Complaint in MDL 2179; and (e) the eight aliquots within Block 252, Mississippi Canyon, OCS Official Protraction Diagram, NH 16-10, three of which were owned or operated by BPXP or a BP Entity as of July 2, 2015.
dd. Natural Resource and Natural Resources means land, fish, wildlife, biota, air, water, ground water, drinking water supplies, sediment, habitat, supporting ecosystem, and/or any other such resources at any time belonging to, managed by, held in trust by, appertaining to, regulated by, assessed as part of the Deepwater Horizon Natural Resource Damages assessment, or otherwise controlled by the United States (including resources of the exclusive economic zone; system unit resources as defined by 54 U.S.C. § 100721(3); park system resources as defined by 16 U.S.C. § 19jj(d); and marine sanctuary resources as defined by 16 U.S.C. § 1432(8)), any Gulf State, and/or any Trustee.
ee. Natural Resource Damages means any costs or damages recoverable by the United States or any of the Gulf States (including the Trustees) as trustees or parens patriae on behalf of the public under Section 1002(b)(2)(A) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2702(b)(2)(A),
14
the Park System Resource Protection Act, 54 U.S.C. § 100722 and the former 16 U.S.C. § 19jj-1 (repealed Dec. 19, 2014), the National Marine Sanctuaries Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1443, Section 311(f)(4) and (5) of the CWA, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1321(f)(4) and (5), Section 107(a)(4)(C) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9607(a)(4)(C), any other federal law, state law, common law, or any federal, state, or local regulation, rule, guidance or ordinance, as compensation to the public for injury to, destruction of, loss of, or loss of use of Natural Resources, including any natural resource services they provide, resulting from a release or threat of release of oil or a hazardous substance or any removal or response action (including any diversion of freshwater). Natural Resource Damages include, without limitation: (i) the costs of assessing injury, destruction, loss of, or loss of use of Natural Resources and the resulting damages; (ii) the costs of restoration, rehabilitation, or replacement of injured, destroyed, or lost Natural Resources and natural resource services or of acquisition of equivalent resources; (iii) the costs of planning and monitoring such restoration activities; and (iv) any other compensation for diminution in value or loss of use or non-use values of Natural Resources.
ff. NOAA means the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
gg. NRDAR Fund means the DOIs Natural Resource Damage Assessment and Restoration Fund.
hh. OCSLA means the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. §§ 1331-1356.
ii. OPA means the Oil Pollution Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 2701-2762.
jj. OSLTF means the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund established pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 9509 and 33 U.S.C. § 1321(s).
15
kk. Paragraph means a portion of this Consent Decree identified by an Arabic numeral or a lower case letter.
ll. Party or Parties means any or all of the United States, the Gulf States, BPXP, BPCNA, and BP p.l.c.
mm. PDARP means the Programmatic Damage Assessment and Restoration Plan for the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill.
nn. Plea Agreement means the agreement approved by the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on January 29, 2013, which is attached as Appendix 5 to this Consent Decree.
oo. Project Stipulation means a stipulation entered into pursuant to the Framework Agreement.
pp. RESTORE Act means the Resources and Ecosystems Sustainability, Tourist Opportunities and Revived Economies of the Gulf Coast States Act of 2012, Public Law 112-141, Subtitle F.
qq. Section means a portion of this Consent Decree denoted by a capitalized Roman numeral.
rr. Settling Local Entity means any local governmental entity that has, in the past, present, or future, settled claims for economic and other damages arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
ss. State Covered Matters means the claims to which the covenant not to sue provided in Paragraph 61 applies.
16
tt. State Trustees means any and all state and local officials designated by any governor of any Gulf State under Section 1006(b)(3) of OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2706(b)(3), or authorized under any other applicable law, to act as a trustee on behalf of the public for Natural Resources in connection with the Deepwater Horizon Incident, including officials from the Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, the Geological Survey of Alabama, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority, the Louisiana Oil Spill Coordinators Office, the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality, the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, the Texas General Land Office, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, and their respective delegates.
uu. Trustee or Trustees means one or more Federal Trustees and/or State Trustees.
vv. U.S. Covered Matters means the claims to which the covenant not to sue provided in Paragraph 60 applies.
ww. USDA means the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
xx. United States means the United States, its agencies, and instrumentalities.
IV. | CIVIL PENALTY |
10. Civil Penalty Amount . BPXP shall pay the United States the sum of $5.5 billion as a civil penalty pursuant to 33 U.S.C. § 1321, and subject to the RESTORE Act.
17
11. Civil Penalty Payment Schedule . BPXP shall pay the civil penalty in accordance with the schedule set forth in Table 1. The Assumed Year presented in Table 1 shall be adjusted, if necessary, so that the first payment is due on the first anniversary after the Effective Date and each subsequent payment is due, respectively, on the subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date.
Table 1: Payment Schedule for Civil Penalty
Payment Date |
Assumed Year | Amount | ||||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2017 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2018 | $ | 189,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2019 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2020 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2021 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2022 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2023 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2024 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2025 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2026 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2027 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2028 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2029 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2030 | $ | 379,310,345 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2031 | $ | 379,310,343 | |||
Total: |
$ | 5,500,000,000 |
12. Interest on the Civil Penalty . Interest shall accrue on all unpaid portions of the civil penalty in accordance with the requirements of Section VII and shall be paid to the United States on the anniversary of the Effective Date occurring in the year 2032. Such interest and any interest or stipulated penalties due under Paragraphs 44 and 51 for failure to timely pay the civil penalty shall be treated as a civil penalty payment pursuant to the CWA and the RESTORE Act.
13. Civil Penalty Payment Procedure . BPXP shall pay the civil penalty and the interest on the civil penalty through EFT pursuant to instructions that shall be provided upon request to BPXP by the Financial Litigation Unit of the Office of the United States Attorney, Eastern District of Louisiana. BPXP shall cause payment to be accompanied by a transmittal letter that shall specify that the payment is a civil penalty under Section 311(b) of the CWA and is being made pursuant to this Consent Decree, in connection with the Deepwater Horizon Incident. BPXP also shall cause the transmittal letter to specify the civil number assigned to this case (10-4536), along with DJ No. 90-5-1-1-10026.
18
14. Tax Treatment . No BP Entity may capitalize into inventory or basis or take as a tax deduction any portion of the civil penalty payments, including interest, due under this Section IV or any penalties or interest due under Paragraphs 44 and 51 for failure to timely pay the civil penalty.
V. | NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES |
15. Natural Resource Damages Amount . BPXP shall pay $7.1 billion, plus any of the $1 billion and accrued interest not yet paid by BPXP under the Framework Agreement, to the United States and the Gulf States for Natural Resource Damages resulting from the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
16. Natural Resource Damages Payment Schedule . BPXP shall pay the $7.1 billion in accordance with the schedule set forth in Table 2. The Assumed Year presented in Table 2 shall be adjusted, if necessary, so that the first payment is due one calendar year after the Effective Date and each subsequent payment is due, respectively, on the subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date. The payments required by this Paragraph shall be distributed to subaccounts within the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill NRD Fund as set forth in Section 2.4 of Appendix 2. Interest on all unpaid portions of the Natural Resource Damages payments required under this Paragraph shall accrue in accordance with Section VII and shall be paid as provided in Paragraph 21.a.
19
Table 2: Payment Schedule for $7.1 Billion Payment for Natural Resource Damages
Payment Date |
Assumed Year | Amount | ||||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2017 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2018 | $ | 244,827,586 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2019 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2020 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2021 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2022 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2023 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2024 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2025 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2026 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2027 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2028 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2029 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2030 | $ | 489,655,172 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2031 | $ | 489,655,178 | |||
Total: |
$ | 7,100,000,000 |
17. Final Payment of Early Restoration Funds . As of the Effective Date, the Framework Agreement and the Project Stipulations entered into under that agreement shall be void as to undertakings between BPXP and the Trustees, provided, however, that the Trustees shall use the amounts paid or committed by BPXP under each Project Stipulation for the project(s) and in the manner specified in each such Project Stipulation and the corresponding early restoration plan adopted by the Trustees, except that decisions concerning any project modification(s), the selection and implementation of any replacement project(s), and the use of any unexpended early restoration project funds shall be made in accordance with the relevant provisions of Appendix 2. No later than 30 days after the Effective Date, BPXP shall pay all then-unpaid amounts that BPXP agreed to pay under the Project Stipulations and the balance remaining under the Framework Agreement ( i.e ., any portion of the $1 billion not previously paid under a Project Stipulation plus accrued interest) to Federal and/or State Trustees in accordance with Paragraph 18.
20
18. Payment Procedure for Natural Resource Damages . BPXP shall make the payments required under Paragraphs 15, 17, and 21 into the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill NRD Fund, to be managed by DOI for the joint benefit and use of the Trustees in accordance with the requirements of Paragraph 19.
19. Use of Natural Resource Damages Payments . The Trustees shall use the amounts paid by BPXP pursuant to Paragraphs 15, 17, and 21 to address injuries and/or losses to Natural Resources (including services provided by Natural Resources) resulting from the Deepwater Horizon Incident, including for Natural Resource Damage assessment and planning activities of the Trustees after the Effective Date; for restoration, rehabilitation, replacement, or acquisition of the equivalent of injured or lost Natural Resources or natural resource services as provided in one or more restoration plans adopted by the Trustees consistent with 15 C.F.R. Part 990; for monitoring, information management, oversight, coordination, public education, and administrative activities related to the restoration plans and programs; and for addressing unknown conditions and undertaking adaptive management. The Trustees shall expend such funds in accordance with the provisions of Appendix 2.
20. Role of BP Entities . BPXP and the other BP Entities had and will have no role in developing the content of Appendix 2 beyond that established by law for members of the public.
21
21. Additional Payments for Unknown Conditions and Adaptive Management . As described in this Paragraph, BPXP shall pay additional funds, not to exceed $700 million, for use by the Federal and State Trustees (1) to address injuries and/or losses to Natural Resources (including services provided by Natural Resources) resulting from the Deepwater Horizon Incident that are unknown to the Trustees as of July 2, 2015, including for any associated Natural Resource Damage assessment and planning activities, or (2) to adapt, enhance, supplement, or replace restoration projects or approaches initially selected by the Trustees. The payments required under this Paragraph shall consist of the following:
a. From the Effective Date, interest shall accrue, as set forth in Section VII, on the unpaid balance of the $7.1 billion required under Paragraph 15. At any time between January 1, 2026 and the anniversary of the Effective Date in the assumed year 2032, the United States and all of the Gulf States may jointly demand payment of all or a part of the accrued and previously unpaid interest on the amount required under Paragraph 15. BPXP shall pay the requested amount of accrued and previously unpaid interest within 60 Days of receipt of the joint demand in accordance with joint instructions provided by the United States and the Gulf States. On the anniversary of the Effective Date in assumed year 2032, BPXP shall pay any remaining unpaid accrued interest as required under Paragraphs 15 and 16 to the Federal and/or State Trustees in accordance with joint instructions provided by the United States and the Gulf States.
b. In addition to the payment(s) of interest under Paragraph 21.a., on the 16th anniversary of the Effective Date, BPXP shall pay $232 million to the United States for the joint use of the Federal and State Trustees.
c. The payments required by this Paragraph shall be distributed to subaccounts within the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill NRD Fund in accordance with Section 2.3.3 of Appendix 2.
22. Reimbursement of Assessment Costs . BPXP shall pay a total of $350 million for previously unreimbursed Natural Resource Damages assessment costs incurred by the Trustees or paid by the OSLTF in connection with the Deepwater Horizon Incident prior to the Effective Date and for the publicly-available data management system described in Paragraph 23.f. The $10 million payment made by BPXP to DOI on July 14, 2015 shall be credited against the $350
22
million total payment. Thereafter, BPXP shall pay the remaining $340 million in accordance with the schedule set forth in Table 3. The Assumed Year presented in Table 3 shall be adjusted, if necessary, so that the first payment is due 60 Days after the Effective Date and each subsequent payment is due, respectively, on the subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date.
Table 3: Schedule for Payment of Past Federal and State Natural Resource Damages Assessment Costs
No. |
Date |
Assumed Year | Amount | |||||
1 |
July 14, 2015 | 2015 | $ | 10,000,000 | ||||
2 |
60 Days After the Effective Date | 2016 | $ | 50,000,000 | ||||
3 |
Anniversary of the Effective Date | 2017 | $ | 50,000,000 | ||||
4 |
Anniversary of the Effective Date | 2018 | $ | 35,000,000 | ||||
5 |
Anniversary of the Effective Date | 2019 | $ | 35,000,000 | ||||
6 |
Anniversary of the Effective Date | 2020 | $ | 40,000,000 | ||||
7 |
Anniversary of the Effective Date | 2021 | $ | 40,000,000 | ||||
8 |
Anniversary of the Effective Date | 2022 | $ | 45,000,000 | ||||
9 |
Anniversary of the Effective Date | 2023 | $ | 45,000,000 | ||||
Total: |
$ | 350,000,000 |
23. Allocation of Assessment Costs .
a. BPXP shall pay $2,250,000 of each of payments number 2 and 3 required by Table 3 to the State of Alabama for Natural Resource Damages. Payment shall be made to the State of Alabama by wire transfer as follows:
Financial Institution: | ########### | |||||
ABA Routing Number: | ######### | |||||
Account to Credit: | ############ |
At the time of each payment, BPXP shall send a copy of the wire transfer authorization form and transaction record in accordance with the notice requirements of Paragraph 92.
23
b. BPXP shall pay $19,125,000 of each of payments number 2 and 3 required by Table 3 to the State of Louisiana for Natural Resource Damages. Payment to the State of Louisiana shall be made by wire transfer as follows:
Bank Name: | ######################### | |||||
Bank Address | ################## | |||||
##################### | ||||||
Account Name: | ########################### | |||||
Account Number: | ########## | |||||
ACH Routing Number | ######## |
BPXP shall notify the Louisiana Office of Finance and Support Services of the amount of payment and the expected wire date. A deposit ticket must be sent to the Louisiana State Treasury in advance to secure the funds being sent. At the time of each payment, BPXP shall send a copy of the wire transfer authorization form and transaction record in accordance with the notice requirements of Paragraph 92.
c. BPXP shall pay $2,875,000 of each of payments number 2 and 3 required by Table 3 to the State of Mississippi for Natural Resource Damages. Payment to the State of Mississippi shall be made by wire transfer as follows:
Account Name: | Mississippi State Treasurer | |||||
Bank Name: | ############ | |||||
Bank Address: | ######################################## | |||||
ACH Route Number: | ######## | |||||
Account Number: | ########## |
d. BPXP shall pay $750,000 of each of payments number 2 and 3 required by Table 3 to the State of Texas by wire transfer to the Comptroller of Public Accounts, State of Texas, for the Attorney Generals Suspense Account, using the following instructions:
Financial Institution: | ############## | |
Routing Number: | ######### | |
Account Name: | Comptroller of Public Accounts, Treasury Operations | |
Account Number to Credit: | ######### | |
Reference: | AG No. 10-3202222 (BP Gulf Oil Spill) | |
Attention: | Office of the Attorney General, Chief, EPD Div. (512-463-2012) | |
Contact: | Kristy Lerma, Financial Reporting (512-475-4377) |
24
At the time of each payment, the payor shall likewise send a copy of the wire transfer authorization form and transaction record, together with a transmittal letter referencing AG No. 10-3202222 to the State of Texas in the manner specified in the notice requirements of Paragraph 92.
e. The State of Florida has no uncompensated assessment costs.
f. BPXP shall pay all other amounts due under Paragraphs 22 and 23 and Table 3 to the United States through EFT pursuant to instructions that shall be provided upon request to BPXP by the Financial Litigation Unit of the Office of the United States Attorney, Eastern District of Louisiana. BPXP shall cause payment to be accompanied by a transmittal letter that states that the payment is being made pursuant to Paragraph 23.f. of this Consent Decree. BPXP also shall specify the civil number assigned to this case (10-4536), along with DJ No. 90-5-1-1-10026. Of the amount paid to the United States, $37 million shall be available to NOAA to establish, populate, manage, and maintain a Gulf-wide environmental data management system that shall be readily accessible to all Trustees and the public.
VI. | OTHER PAYMENTS BY BPXP AND RELATED TERMS |
24. Amount of Other Payments . BPXP shall pay the United States a total of $250 million, allocated as follows :
a. $167.4 million to pay unreimbursed response or removal costs related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident, paid or obligated by the OSLTF or incurred by the United States, prior to July 2, 2015; and
b. $82.6 million in settlement of the United States claims under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq ., and the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act, 30 U.S.C. § 1756 . This amount includes and resolves the share of royalty owed by BPXP and MOEX Offshore 2007 LLC for oil lost from the Macondo Well between April 2010 and July 2010 (a total share of 75%), but does not resolve or impair, in any way, any claims of the United States against
25
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation or its affiliates for the remaining 25% share of that royalty, for which the United States alleges that Anadarko Petroleum Corporation or its affiliates are liable. This Consent Decree prohibits use or application of any of the proceeds secured hereunder from this $82.6 million or otherwise to address in any way the claims of the United States against Anadarko Petroleum Corporation or its affiliates for royalties related to the Macondo Well
25. Schedule for Payment of Other Amounts . BPXP shall pay the $250 million required by Paragraph 24 in accordance with the schedule set forth in Table 4 on the respective anniversary of the Effective Date. The Assumed Year presented in Table 4 shall be adjusted, if necessary, so that the first payment is due 60 Days after the Effective Date and each subsequent payment is due, respectively, on the subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date.
Table 4: Schedule for Payment of $250 Million
Date |
Assumed Year | Amount | ||||
60 Days After the Effective Date |
2016 | $ | 40,000,000 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2017 | $ | 30,000,000 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2018 | $ | 30,000,000 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2019 | $ | 30,000,000 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2020 | $ | 30,000,000 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2021 | $ | 30,000,000 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2022 | $ | 30,000,000 | |||
Anniversary of the Effective Date |
2023 | $ | 30,000,000 | |||
Total: |
$ | 250,000,000 |
26. Payment of Other Amounts . BPXP shall make payments of the amounts due to the United States pursuant to Paragraph 24 through EFT pursuant to instructions that shall be provided upon request to BPXP by the Financial Litigation Unit of the Office of the United States Attorney, Eastern District of Louisiana. BPXP shall cause payment to be accompanied by a transmittal letter that identifies the allocation of the payment set forth in Paragraph 24 and specifies the payment is being made pursuant to this Consent Decree in connection with the Deepwater Horizon Incident. BPXP also shall specify the civil number assigned to this case (10-4536), along with DJ No. 90-5-1-1-10026.
26
VII. | INTEREST |
27. Accrual of Interest . Interest on the unpaid balances due pursuant to Paragraphs 10 and 15 shall accrue from the Effective Date through the date of payment and shall be compounded annually on each anniversary of the Effective Date and shall be calculated on an actual/actual day basis. In the event of a payment of interest pursuant to Paragraph 21 or Section VIII of this Consent Decree that occurs after an anniversary date, the interest shall be calculated from the Effective Date through the date of payment.
28. Interest Rate . Interest shall accrue at the rate calculated by taking the average market yield on U.S. Treasury securities at 2-year and 3-year constant maturities, quoted on an investment basis by the U.S. Federal Reserve (H.15 Release), for the period from May 28, 2014 to May 27, 2015, rounded to two decimal places.
VIII. ACCELERATION OF PAYMENTS
29. BPXP Option for Acceleration . BPXP shall have the option (at its sole discretion) to pay any of the amounts required in Sections IV, V, or VI before they are due. Any such prepayment of an installment shall include the accrued but unpaid interest, if applicable (calculated in accordance with Section VII).
30. Acceleration Upon Change of Control . If there has been a Change of Control, the United States and all Gulf States may jointly elect to accelerate the schedule for all or any of the payments required in Sections IV, V and/or VI. If the United States and all Gulf States jointly elect to accelerate all or any of the payments due under Sections IV, V and/or VI, such accelerated payments shall become due and owing 120 Days after service of notice of such election, or any other time that the Parties may jointly agree upon.
27
31. Acceleration Upon Insolvency . If there has been an Act of Insolvency, the United States and all of the Gulf States may jointly elect to accelerate the schedule for all or any of the payments required in Sections IV, V, and/or VI. If the United States and all of the Gulf States jointly elect to accelerate all or any of the payments due under Sections IV, V, and/or VI, such accelerated payments shall become due and owing 120 Days after service of notice of such election, or any other time that the Parties may agree upon.
IX. | FINANCIAL ASSURANCE |
32. Commitment of Guarantors .
a. As set forth in the Primary Guaranty in Appendix 8, BPCNA hereby absolutely and irrevocably guaranties the payments of all kinds due from BPXP under this Consent Decree in the event that BPXP defaults on such payments.
b. As set forth in the Secondary Guaranty in Appendix 9, BP p.l.c. hereby absolutely and irrevocably guaranties the payments of all kinds due from BPXP under this Consent Decree in the event that BPXP defaults on such payments and BPCNA defaults on its obligation to serve as primary guarantor.
c. For purposes of any action to enforce the guaranty obligations set forth herein, BPCNA and BP p.l.c. waive all defenses or other arguments based in whole or part on the nature of the payments guarantied, the nature of the claims from which those payment obligations arose, or the nature of this Consent Decree.
33. Standard for Default .
a. For the purposes of Paragraph 32, BPXP shall be considered in default of a payment required under this Consent Decree if any of the following conditions has been met:
i. BPXP has failed to make such payment within 60 Days after such payment has become due under the Consent Decree;
28
ii. BPXP has filed for bankruptcy under the United States Bankruptcy Code or other applicable statute(s) or code(s) pertaining to insolvency; or
iii. any third party has petitioned a court to place BPXP in bankruptcy under the United States Bankruptcy Code or other applicable statute(s) or code(s) pertaining to insolvency, an order for relief is entered, and any such filing or petition is not dismissed within 60 Days of such order for relief.
b. For the purposes of Paragraph 32, BPCNA shall be considered in default on its guaranty of a payment required under this Consent Decree if BPXP has defaulted on such payment and any of the following conditions has been met:
i. BPCNA has failed to make such payment within 60 Days after BPXP has defaulted pursuant to Paragraph 33.a.; or
ii. BPCNA has filed for bankruptcy under the United States Bankruptcy Code or other applicable statute(s) or code(s) pertaining to insolvency; or
iii. any third party has petitioned a court to place BPCNA in bankruptcy under the United States Bankruptcy Code or other applicable statute(s) or code(s) pertaining to insolvency, an order for relief is entered, and any such filing, or petition is not dismissed within 60 Days of such order for relief .
X. | INJUNCTIVE RELIEF |
34. Prior Agreements . Various BP Entities and the United States have previously entered into certain agreements setting forth injunctive relief and other requirements of performance related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident, as described generally in this Paragraph:
a. On January 29, 2013, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana approved BPXPs Plea Agreement which included injunctive relief set forth in Exhibit B. Exhibit B requires BPXP to implement specific improvements related to deep water
29
drilling safety, including, e.g .: (1) third party verification of blowout preventers; (2) improvements in its cement design and competency; (3) the maintenance of a real-time, drilling operations monitoring center in Houston; (4) completion of additional oil spill response training and drills; (5) audits of the Safety and Environmental Management Systems of BPXP-contracted drilling rigs and BPXP-operated platforms, including BPXP-owned platform rigs; (6) development and implementation of a well control competency assessment plan for those it uses as Well Site leaders; (7) in collaboration with industry and government, initiation of at least four pilot projects to evaluate technology enhancements intended to improve operational safety with respect to deep water drilling and make available any resulting data or technology to anyone on commercially reasonable terms; and (8) requirements related to the use of two blind-shear rams on blowout preventers. Pursuant to Exhibit B, BPXP has submitted a detailed Implementation Plan for accomplishing these and other measures related to safe deep water drilling operations.
b. Exhibit B also requires appointment of both a process safety monitor and an ethics monitor. In brief, the process safety monitors duties are to review, evaluate, and provide recommendations for the improvement of BPXPs process safety and risk management procedures. In brief, the ethics monitors duties are to review and provide recommendations for improvement of BPXPs code of conduct and its implementation and enforcement for the purpose of preventing future criminal and ethical violations with respect to dealings with regulatory and enforcement authorities. Exhibit B also requires appointment of an independent, third party auditor to sample or test compliance with various portions of Exhibit B. Exhibit B to the Plea Agreement and its Implementation Plan are attached to the Consent Decree as part of Appendices 5 and 6, respectively.
30
c. On March 13, 2014, BP p.l.c., BPCNA, BPXP, and certain other BP Entities entered into an Administrative Agreement with the EPA to resolve all suspension and debarment matters arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident. The Administrative Agreement incorporates terms and conditions of both the Plea Agreement noted above and of a Securities and Exchange Commission Judgment Order entered against BP on December 10, 2012 ( Securities and Exchange Commission v. BP p.l.c., E.D. La.). The Administrative Agreement also requires actions related to maintenance or improvement of ethics and compliance programs and good corporate governance activities, such as: code-of-conduct training, the operation of an employee concerns hotline, and maintenance of risk-based compliance standards and procedures for BP Entities based in the United States. The Administrative Agreement also contains certain other specific additional provisions targeted to deep water drilling safety in the United States, including provisions related to contractor oversight and audits of safety and environmental management systems. The ethics monitor under the Plea Agreement also serves as an ethics monitor under the Administrative Agreement. A copy of the Administrative Agreement is attached to the Consent Decree as Appendix 4.
35. Acknowledgement of Compliance . BPXP acknowledges that it is in material compliance with the injunctive relief provisions set forth in Exhibit B and the requirements of the Implementation Plan and the Administrative Agreement.
36. Compliance with Exhibit B and the Administrative Agreement . BPXPs and the other BP Entities obligations under Exhibit B, including the Implementation Plan, and under the Administrative Agreement continue and remain enforceable under the Plea Agreement or Administrative Agreement, as applicable, and not under this Consent Decree.
31
37. Submissions to DOJ ENRD . BPXP shall provide to DOJ ENRD copies of those documents specifically identified in Appendix 10. BPXP shall provide each document identified in Appendix 10 in the time and manner and format required by Appendix 10. To the extent that BPXP asserts that a document in Appendix 10 being submitted to DOJ ENRD contains confidential business information, BPXP shall mark or otherwise identify the document as confidential.
38. Information to be Made Publicly Available .
a. BPXP shall post to a publicly-available web site:
i. The Consent Decree;
ii. Annual reports submitted to the EPA Suspension and Debarment Office pursuant to Section X, Paragraph 1 of the Administrative Agreement and the annual reports submitted to the Department of Justice Criminal Division pursuant to Paragraph 23 of Exhibit B and Section E of the Implementation Plan;
iii. Formal written notices or warnings that any BP Entity receives from an instrumentality of the United States under the applicable agreement asserting a material violation, deficiency, or non-compliance of either Exhibit B, including the Implementation Plan, or the Administrative Agreement;
iv. A description (including necessary context) of the changes that are required of BPXP by operation of either Exhibit B or the Administrative Agreement, as specified by the entries in Appendix 11; and
v. Final findings of deficiencies from auditors retained under the Administrative Agreement or Exhibit B.
32
b. Solely for the purposes of this Paragraph, a final finding of deficiency means that recommendation or finding of deficiency, as the case may be, that exists after all objections and/or appeals have been finally resolved pursuant to the applicable process under either the Administrative Agreement or Exhibit B and the Implementation Plan.
c. Those items that are required to be posted pursuant to Paragraphs 38.a.ii through 38.a.v, and the manner of posting, are specifically identified in Appendix 11.
39. Protocol for Redaction Before On-Line Posting .
a. With respect to those documents to be posted pursuant to Paragraph 38, BPXP shall have 60 Days from either BPXPs submission of the final document to the relevant agencies (under the Administrative Agreement or Exhibit B) or BPXPs receipt of the final monitor recommendations or final auditor findings of deficiency, whichever is applicable, to post a redacted version of the document to the publicly-available web site. BPXP may redact:
i. Information that would reveal the identity of an individual or personal or private information about an individual;
ii. Trade secrets; and
iii. Confidential business information too sensitive to BPXPs or another BP Entitys competitive position to allow public disclosure.
b. At any time following posting of a document to the publicly-available web site, EPA (for documents under the Administrative Agreement), or the Department of Justice Criminal Division and/or BSEE (for documents under Exhibit B and the Implementation Plan) may in their discretion review BPXPs redacted version of any document for consistency with the requirements of this Paragraph for redacting. If the relevant agency believes that any material should not have been redacted under the applicable agencys standards for protection of trade
33
secrets, confidential business information, and/or personally identifying information, such agency shall informally notify BPXP of the objection and initiate informal discussions concerning the redacted material. In the event the parties are unable to informally resolve the objection, the relevant agency may in its discretion withdraw the objection, or seek to resolve the objection pursuant to the provisions of Section XII of this Consent Decree (Dispute Resolution).
40. Expiration of Requirement to Provide Documents . The requirements of Paragraph 37 shall terminate with respect to documents required by the Administrative Agreement when the Administrative Agreement terminates and with respect to documents required by Exhibit B (including the Implementation Plan) when the Plea Agreement terminates.
41. Limited Duration of Postings . The Consent Decree shall remain posted until termination of the Consent Decree. All postings stemming from Exhibit B shall remain posted until two years after the last such posting required. All postings stemming from the Administrative Agreement shall remain posted until two years after the last such posting is required. Any posting not covered by the prior sentences of this Paragraph shall remain posted until all requirements for posting have been satisfied, save for posting of the Consent Decree.
XI. | STIPULATED PENALTIES |
42. Liability for Stipulated Penalties . BPXP shall be liable for stipulated penalties to the United States and the Gulf States for violations of this Consent Decree as specified below.
43. Definition of Violation . A violation includes failing to perform any payment obligation required by the terms of this Consent Decree or failing to perform any of the obligations set forth in Paragraphs 37 and 38, according to all applicable requirements of this Consent Decree and within the specified time schedules established by this Consent Decree.
34
44. Failure to Make Timely Payments . In addition to the interest that would be due and any other available remedy, if BPXP fails to make any payment required by Sections IV, V, or VI, BPXP also shall be liable to the United States and all of the the Gulf States for a per Day, stipulated penalty as follows:
Period of Delay or Non-Compliance |
Per Violation per Day | |||
5th through 30th Day after accrual date |
$ | 50,000 | ||
31st through 45th Day after accrual date |
$ | 100,000 | ||
Beyond 45th Day after accrual date |
$ | 200,000 |
45. Stipulated Penalties for Other Violations . The following stipulated penalties shall accrue per violation per Day for each violation of the requirements of Paragraphs 37 and 38 of this Consent Decree:
Period of Delay or Non-Compliance |
Per Violation per Day | |||
1st through 30th Day after accrual date |
$ | 7,500 | ||
31st through 45th Day after accrual date |
$ | 20,000 | ||
Beyond 45th Day after accrual date |
$ | 25,000 |
46. Accrual Date of Stipulated Penalties . The stipulated penalties provided for in Paragraph 44 shall begin to accrue 5 Days after the payment is due and continue to accrue each Day until full payment is made. The stipulated penalties provided for in Paragraph 45 shall begin to accrue the Day after the deadline for compliance and shall continue to accrue until performance is completed or until the violation ceases. Stipulated penalties shall accrue simultaneously for separate violations of this Consent Decree.
47. Schedule for Payment of Stipulated Penalties . Subject to Paragraph 49, BPXP shall pay any stipulated penalty within 30 Days of receiving a written demand and payment instructions by the United States.
35
48. Discretion to Waive Stipulated Penalties .
a. The United States may, in the unreviewable exercise of its discretion, reduce or waive any applicable stipulated penalties due for violations of Sections IV, VI, or X of this Consent Decree.
b. The United States and all of the Gulf States may, in the joint exercise of their unreviewable discretion, reduce or waive any applicable stipulated penalties due for violations of Section V, VII, VIII, or IX of this Consent Decree.
49. Effect of Dispute Resolution . Stipulated penalties shall continue to accrue as provided in Paragraph 46 during any dispute resolution pursuant to Section XII of this Consent Decree, but need not be paid until the following:
a. If the dispute is resolved by agreement of the Parties or by a decision of the United States (after consultation with all of the Gulf States for disputes arising under Sections V, VII, VIII, or IX) that BPXP does not appeal to the Court, BPXP shall pay accrued penalties determined to be owing, together with interest, to the United States within 30 Days of the effective date of the agreement or the receipt of decision of the United States.
b. If the dispute is decided by the Court, BPXP shall pay all accrued penalties determined by the Court as owing, together with interest, within 60 Days of receiving the Courts decision or order, except as provided in Paragraph 49.c.
c. If any Party appeals the Courts decision, BPXP shall pay all accrued penalties determined as owing, together with interest (calculated in accordance with Paragraph 51), within 30 Days of receiving the final appellate court decision.
36
50. Payment of Stipulated Penalties . Each separate violation shall give rise to a single penalty per Day in the amount specified above. That single penalty shall be allocated in accordance with this Paragraph.
a. For violations of Paragraphs 37 or 38, BPXP shall pay the stipulated penalty to the United States in accordance with the payment instructions provided by the United States with the demand.
b. For violations of Section V, VII, VIII, or IX, BPXP shall pay the stipulated penalty in the following manner:
i. BPXP shall pay 10% of the stipulated penalty to the State of Alabama by wire transfer as follows:
Financial Institution: | ########### | |||||
ABA Routing Number: | ######### | |||||
Account to Credit: | ############ |
At the time of each payment, BPXP shall send a copy of the wire transfer authorization form and transaction record in accordance with the notice requirements of Paragraph 92.
ii. BPXP shall pay 10% of the stipulated penalty to the State of Florida. All payments to be made to the State of Florida under Paragraph 50.b. of this Consent Decree shall be deposited by the State of Florida into the Water Quality Assurance Trust Fund. Payments to the State of Florida shall be made by wire transfer using the following instructions:
Financial Institution: | ############### | |||||
##################### | ||||||
##################### | ||||||
Nine Digit Routing Number | ########### | |||||
Depositor Account Number | ############ | |||||
Depositor Account Name | State of FL, DFS, Chief Financial Officer, (DEP) | |||||
Type of Account | Checking | |||||
FEID # | ########## |
37
At the time of each payment, BPXP shall likewise send a copy of the wire transfer authorization form and transaction record, together with a transmittal letter referencing Paragraph 50.b. of this Consent Decree to the State of Florida in the manner specified in the notice requirements of Paragraph 92.
iii. BPXP shall pay 10% of the stipulated penalty to the State of Louisiana by wire transfer using the following instructions:
Bank Name: | ######################### | |||||
Bank Address | ################## | |||||
##################### | ||||||
Account Name: | State of Louisiana Treasury | |||||
Account Number: | ########## | |||||
ACH Routing Number | ######## |
BPXP shall notify the Louisiana Office of Finance and Support Services of the amount of payment and the expected wire date. A deposit ticket must be sent to the Louisiana State Treasury in advance to secure the funds being sent. At the time of each payment, BPXP shall send a copy of the wire transfer authorization form and transaction record in accordance with the notice requirements of Paragraph 92.
iv. BPXP shall pay 10% of the stipulated penalty to the State of Mississippi by wire transfer as follows:
Account Name: | Mississippi State Treasurer | |||||
Bank Name: | ############ | |||||
Bank Address: | ######################################## | |||||
ACH Route Number: | ######## | |||||
Account Number: | ########## |
38
v. BPXP shall pay 10% of the stipulated penalty to the State of Texas by wire transfer to the Comptroller of Public Accounts, State of Texas, for the Attorney Generals Suspense Account, using the following instructions:
Financial Institution: | ############## | |
Routing Number: | ######### | |
Account Name: | Comptroller of Public Accounts, Treasury Operations | |
Account Number to Credit: | ######### | |
Reference: | AG No. 10-3202222 (BP Gulf Oil Spill) | |
Attention: | Office of the Attorney General, Chief, EPD Div. (512-463-2012) | |
Contact: | Kristy Lerma, Financial Reporting (512-475-4377) |
At the time of each payment, the payor shall likewise send a copy of the wire transfer authorization form and transaction record, together with a transmittal letter referencing AG No. 10-3202222 to the State of Texas in the manner specified in the notice requirements of Paragraph 92;
vi. BPXP shall pay 50% of the stipulated penalty to the United States in accordance with the payment instructions provided by the United States with the demand.
51. Interest on Late Payments of Stipulated Penalties . If BPXP fails to pay stipulated penalties according to the terms of this Consent Decree, BPXP shall be liable for interest as provided for in 28 U.S.C. § 1961, accruing as of the date payment became due. Nothing in this Paragraph shall be construed to limit the United States from seeking any remedy otherwise provided by law for BPXPs failure to pay any stipulated penalties. BPXP shall pay any interest due under this Paragraph in accordance with the instructions and proportions set forth in Paragraph 50.
52. No Effect on Obligation to Comply . The payment of penalties and interest pursuant to this Section shall not alter in any way BPXPs obligation to complete the performance of the requirements of this Consent Decree.
53. No Effect on Other Remedies . Subject to the covenants provided by the United States and Gulf States in Section XIII, the stipulated penalties provided for in this Consent Decree shall be in addition to any other rights, remedies, or sanctions available to the United States or Gulf States for BPXPs violation of this Consent Decree.
39
XII. | DISPUTE RESOLUTION |
54. Exclusivity of Remedy .
a. Unless otherwise expressly provided for in this Consent Decree, the dispute resolution procedures of this Section shall be the exclusive mechanism to resolve disputes arising under this Consent Decree. BPXPs failure to seek resolution of a dispute under this Section shall preclude it from raising any such issue as a defense to an action by the United States or the Gulf States to enforce any obligation of BPXP arising under this Consent Decree.
b. The dispute resolution procedures set forth in this Section shall not apply to disputes among the United States and Gulf States, including, but not limited to, disputes arising under Appendix 2. Such disputes shall be subject to the provisions of Appendix 2 and any Memoranda of Understanding developed pursuant to Appendix 2.
55. Informal Dispute Resolution . If any Party determines that there is a dispute subject to the Dispute Resolution provisions of this Consent Decree, that Party shall send a written notice of dispute to all other Parties outlining the nature of the dispute and requesting informal negotiations to resolve the dispute. The Parties shall endeavor to resolve the dispute through good faith negotiations, but if the Parties cannot resolve a dispute by informal negotiations, then the position advanced by the United States, after consultation with any affected Gulf State, shall be considered binding unless BPXP invokes formal dispute resolution procedures as set forth below.
56. Formal Dispute Resolution .
a. To invoke formal dispute resolution, BPXP shall, within 10 Days after the conclusion of informal dispute resolution, serve on the United States and any affected Gulf State a written Statement of Position regarding the matter in dispute. The Statement of Position shall include, but need not be limited to, any factual data, analysis, or opinion supporting BPXPs position and any supporting documentation relied upon by BPXP.
40
b. The United States, after consultation with any affected Gulf State, shall serve its Statement of Position within 20 Days of receipt of BPXPs Statement of Position. The United States Statement of Position shall include, but is not limited to, any factual data, analysis, or opinion supporting that position and any supporting documentation relied upon by the United States.
c. The United States Statement of Position shall be binding on BPXP unless BPXP files a motion for judicial review of the dispute in accordance with the following Paragraph.
57. Judicial Review . BPXP may seek judicial review of the dispute by filing with the Court and serving on the United States and each of the affected Gulf States in accordance with Section XIX of this Consent Decree, a motion requesting judicial resolution of the dispute.
a. BPXPs motion must be filed within 20 Days of receipt of the United States Statement of Position pursuant to the preceding Paragraph. The motion shall contain a written statement of BPXPs position on the matter in dispute, including any supporting factual data, analysis, opinion, or documentation, and shall set forth the relief requested and any schedule within which the dispute must be resolved for orderly implementation of this Consent Decree.
b. The United States and any affected Gulf State shall respond to BPXPs motion within the time period allowed by the Local Rules of this Court.
41
58. Burden of Proof . Except as otherwise provided herein, BPXP shall bear the burden of demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that its position complies with this Consent Decree. With respect to disputes arising under Section XIII, including the application of any defined terms for purposes of Section XIII, the burden of proof shall be in accordance with applicable principles of law.
59. No Effect on Deadlines . The invocation of dispute resolution procedures under this Section shall not, by itself, extend, postpone, or affect in any way any obligation of BPXP under this Consent Decree, unless and until final resolution of the dispute so provides.
XIII. COVENANTS NOT TO SUE AND RESERVATIONS
60. United States Covenants to BP Entities . Subject only to the reservations of rights in Paragraphs 64 and 65, the United States covenants not to sue BPXP and/or other BP Entities for any and all civil or administrative claims arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident, including but not limited to any and all such claims under (a) OPA; (b) the CWA; (c) OCSLA; (d) the Endangered Species Act § 11(a)(1), 16 U.S.C. § 1540(a)(1); (e) the Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C § 1361 et seq .; (f) the National Marine Sanctuaries Act § 306, 16 U.S.C. § 1436; (g) the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act, 30 U.S.C. § 1719(a); (h) the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729 et seq .; (i) CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq .; (j) the National Historic Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq. and the former 16 U.S.C. § 470 et seq . (repealed Dec. 19, 2014); (k) the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq .; (l) the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11001 et seq .; (m) any claims asserted by the United States in Civ. No.2:10-cv-04536 (E.D. La.) and MDL 2179; or (n) any other statute or cause of action for civil damages or civil penalties that the Civil Division of the Department of Justice or DOJ ENRD has actual and present authority to assert and compromise pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 0.45 or § 0.65. Subject only to the reservations of rights in Paragraphs 64 and 65, the United States also covenants not to sue BPXP and/or other BP Entities for (a) past, present, or future Natural Resource Damages, whether known or unknown, including assessment costs, resulting from the Deepwater Horizon Incident; and (b) costs of response or removal related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
42
61. Gulf States Covenants to BP Entities . Subject only to the reservation of rights in Paragraph 64, each of the Gulf States fully, finally, and forever release and waive any and all claims against BPXP and/or the BP Entities arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident and further, the Gulf States covenant not to sue BPXP and/or BP Entities for any and all civil or administrative claims arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident, including but not limited to claims under any and all of the following: (a) OPA; (b) the CWA; (c) OCSLA; (d) the Endangered Species Act § 11(a)(1), 16 U.S.C. § 1540(a)(1); (e) the Marine Mammal Protection Act, 16 U.S.C § 1361 et seq.; (f) the National Marine Sanctuaries Act § 306, 16 U.S.C. § 1436; (g) the Federal Oil and Gas Royalty Management Act, 30 U.S.C. § 1719(a); (h) the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq .; (i) CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. ; (j) the National Historic Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq. and the former 16 U.S.C. § 470 et seq . (repealed Dec. 19, 2014); (k) the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq. ; (l) the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, 42 U.S.C. § 11001 et seq .; (m) any state statutes corresponding to or containing causes of action similar to those provided to the United States government under (a) through (l) above; and (n) any other claims or causes of action for damages, costs, fines, or penalties arising under any state statute, ordinance, regulation or common law related to protection or restoration of the environment or Natural Resources or historic preservation arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident. Subject only to the reservation of rights in Paragraph 64, the Gulf States also covenant not to sue BPXP and/or BP Entities for (a) past, present or future Natural Resource Damages, whether known or unknown, including assessment costs, resulting from the Deepwater Horizon Incident; and (b) costs of response or removal related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
43
62. Covenants Concerning Natural Resource Damages . The United States and Gulf States agree that the payments provided under Sections V and VII, together with the payments previously provided under the Framework Agreement, will fully resolve their claims for Natural Resource Damages, whether known or unknown, resulting from the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
63. Covenants Concerning Indemnified Parties . The United States and the Gulf States, including any future-designated Natural Resource Trustees, shall not assert claims against any and all Indemnified Parties to the same extent that the United States or Gulf States have covenanted not to sue BPXP and/or BP Entities in Paragraphs 60 and 61, as applicable. For all such Indemnified Parties this covenant excludes penalties, and for Anadarko this covenant also excludes royalties that the United States alleges are owed to DOI on oil from the Macondo Well that was discharged during the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
64. Reservations of Rights by the United States and Gulf States . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Consent Decree, the United States and the Gulf States each reserve the following claims against BPXP or any other person:
a. Claims based on a failure to meet a requirement of the Consent Decree;
b. Claims based on past, present, or future discharges or releases of oil or a hazardous substance outside the definition of Deepwater Horizon Incident;
c. Claims based on any discharge or release of oil or a hazardous substance from the Macondo Well after the Date of Lodging of the Consent Decree; and
44
d. Claims based on any violation of federal or state law that occurs after the Date of Lodging of the Consent Decree.
65. Additional Reservations of Rights Solely by the United States . Notwithstanding any other provision of this Consent Decree, the United States reserves the following claims against BPXP or any other person:
a. Claims for response or removal costs related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident that are incurred on or after July 2, 2015 and have been paid by the OSLTF, provided that where oil is addressed in such a response or removal, the oil is found to be from the Macondo Well based on either: (i) a positive chemical fingerprinting test; or (ii) a preponderance of the evidence, including chemical testing and other factors, taking into consideration any evidence provided by any BP Entity that disputes liability. BPXP and the BP Entities reserve all their rights to assert any factual or legal defenses against claims asserted by the United States under this subparagraph.
b. All subrogated rights under OPA, 33 U.S.C. § 2715, with respect to any claims for damages other than Natural Resource Damages resulting from the Deepwater Horizon Incident that are (i) brought by parties other than the United States or any of its agencies, departments, or branches, the Gulf States or any of the Gulf States agencies, departments, branches, or any Settling Local Entity, and (ii) are paid by the OSLTF after July 2, 2015. The BP Entities reserve all their rights to assert any factual or legal defenses against subrogated claims asserted by the United States under this subparagraph.
66. Data Sharing and Related Agreements Voided . As of the Effective Date of this Consent Decree, any and all Natural Resource Damages assessment agreements related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident between any Trustee and BPXP, including any commitments in work plans or other formal or informal agreements, written or oral, to (i) provide data, analysis
45
or any other material or information related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident natural resource damages assessment or restoration planning or (ii) to share or preserve any tangible things or information, shall be void. Each BP Entity will keep confidential and not make public information as provided under the following data sharing agreements: Sea Turtle Data Sharing Agreement; Marine Mammal Data Sharing Agreement; and the Sea Turtle Carcass Drift Study.
67. Savings Provision . Except as provided in Paragraph 66, other than the Project Stipulations entered into pursuant to the Framework Agreement, these covenants not to sue do not affect rights under any written agreement or settlement, existing as of July 2, 2015 to which any instrumentality of the United States and any of the BP Entities are both a party.
68. BP Entities Covenants to the United States and the Gulf States . BPXP and the BP Entities each covenant not to sue the United States or any of the Gulf States for, or to maintain in any administrative proceeding, any claim or defense that any of them has asserted in MDL 2179 and any other claims asserted or that could be asserted by any of the BP Entities against the United States and/or the Gulf States arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident, including, but not limited, to claims pursuant to OPA §§ 1007, 1008, 1012, 1013, or 1015(a), 33 U.S.C. §§ 2707, 2708, 2712, 2713, or 2715(a), or before the IBLA, based on transactions or occurrences prior to July 2, 2015.
69. Treatment in Federal Contracts . In their capacities as federal contractors and lessees, each BP Entity agrees not to charge the United States, such as through a cost plus contract, for any payments made or costs incurred in connection with U.S. Covered Matters or State Covered Matters and the Plea Agreement. Nothing in this Paragraph shall require any BP Entity to change its ordinary accounting practice for overhead expenses in contracts that are not cost plus contracts.
46
70. Gulf States Covenants to the United States . Each of the Gulf States covenants not to sue or otherwise assert any claims against the OSLTF arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
71. Attorneys Fees and Costs . Except as otherwise ordered by the Court, no Party or BP Entity shall seek from another Party or any BP Entity any costs within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1920 or attorney fees arising from MDL 2179 (including any matters transferred to MDL 2179), State Covered Matters or U.S. Covered Matters.
72. Dismissal of Appeals . Upon the Effective Date of the Consent Decree, BPXP and the United States agree to file with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in appeal docket number 14-31374 a joint stipulation stating that they have settled their dispute regarding the CWA and accordingly that BPXP is no longer seeking Fifth Circuit review of the Court orders at issue in that appeal with respect to the United States, but will continue to seek review of those orders to the extent that those orders relate to any ongoing disputes between the BP Entities and other parties to that appeal and/or in other pending proceedings. The BP Entities also agree that in the remaining appeal they will not assert any legal arguments interpreting the standard for determining gross negligence under the CWA or OPA, provided, however, that nothing in this Paragraph shall be construed to limit the BP Entities ability to advance, or respond to, any legal arguments regarding the standard for gross negligence or recklessness under general maritime law.
73. Dismissal of IBLA Appeals . By no later than 15 Days after the Effective Date, BPXP shall withdraw with prejudice its appeals IBLA 2012-50, IBLA 2012-85, and IBLA 2010-0236, and the incidents of noncompliance issued by BSEE on October 12, 2011 and December 7, 2011, as described in Paragraph J, are then fully and finally resolved.
47
74. Instrumentalities . All references to the Gulf States in this Section XIII and Paragraph 5 shall include each and every of the five Gulf States and, respectively, all State Trustees, all branches, agencies, associations, authorities, boards, bureaus, councils, departments, educational institutions or systems, components, public benefits corporations, or other instrumentalities of any kind, administrators, elected or unelected officials, officers or delegates (other than in their individual capacities), attorneys, or other agents of any kind of each of the Gulf States, provided however that a reference to a Gulf State shall not include counties, parishes, municipalities, or any other local governmental or local political subdivisions authorized by law to perform local governmental functions.
XIV. | ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS |
75. Resolution of Other Gulf States Claims . This settlement, and the entry of the Consent Decree, are conditioned upon the Settlement Agreement between the Gulf States and BPXP fully and finally resolving the Gulf States remaining claims arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident being executed and effective.
76. Limitation on Naming Trustees .
a. The Trustees designated by the United States and each of the Gulf States with respect to the Deepwater Horizon Incident are set forth in Appendix 1. No Gulf State shall designate any new Trustee for the purpose of asserting a claim for Natural Resource Damages resulting from the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
b. The Trustees will negotiate a revised Memorandum of Understanding among them which will, among other things, reflect USDA and EPA membership in the Trustee Council.
48
77. Final Judgment . Upon approval and entry of this Consent Decree by the Court, this Consent Decree shall constitute a final judgment of the Court as to the United States, each of the Gulf States, BPXP, BPCNA, and BP p.l.c. The Court finds that there is no just reason for delay and therefore the Court enters this Consent Decree as a final judgment under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54(b) and 58.
78. Integration . Except as expressly provided in Pararaph 75, this Consent Decree constitutes the final, complete, and exclusive agreement and understanding among the Parties with respect to the settlement embodied in this Consent Decree and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, whether oral or written, concerning the settlement embodied herein. No other document, or any representation, inducement, agreement, understanding, or promise, shall constitute any part of this Consent Decree or the settlement it represents.
79. No Admissions .
a. Except as expressly provided in this Consent Decree, nothing in this Consent Decree shall constitute an admission of any fact or law by any Party except for the purpose of enforcing the terms or conditions set forth herein.
b. The Parties agree that Appendix 2 and the PDARP, and any amendments or modifications thereto, shall not constitute an admission of fact or law by BPXP or any BP Entity. BPXP and the BP Entities reserve their right to object to any statements, data, findings, methods, or calculations in the PDARP or future restoration plans related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident, in any proceeding, forum, or matter other than a proceeding to challenge the legal sufficiency or validity of the Consent Decree or the PDARP or any such future plan.
XV. | PUBLIC PARTICIPATION |
80. Public Comment Procedure . This Consent Decree will be lodged with the Court to allow for a period of not less than 60 Days for public notice and comment using the procedures of 28 C.F.R. § 50.7, 42 U.S.C. § 6973(d), La. R.S. 30:2050.7, and Texas Water Code § 7.110.
49
81. The United States and Gulf States Right to Withdraw Consent . At any time prior to the Effective Date, the United States and each Gulf State may withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed Consent Decree if comments received during the public comment procedure disclose facts or considerations indicating that the proposed Consent Decree or any of its terms is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.
82. Effect of Withdrawal by the United States or One of the Gulf States . If the United States or any Gulf State withdraws from the proposed Consent Decree, the proposed Consent Decree shall become null and void as to all other Parties.
83. Consent to Entry . BPXP, BPCNA, and BP p.l.c. each consent to entry of the proposed Consent Decree without further notice and agree not to withdraw from or oppose entry of the proposed Consent Decree by the Court or to challenge any provision of the proposed Consent Decree, unless the United States or one of the Gulf States withdraws from the proposed Consent Decree pursuant to Paragraph 81.
XVI. | LIMITS AND EFFECTIVE DATE OF CONSENT DECREE |
84. Requirement to Comply with Other Law . Nothing in this Decree excuses BPXP from securing any applicable permits or complying with applicable law.
85. Effective Date of Consent Decree . This Consent Decree takes effect upon the Effective Date.
86. Payment Dates . If any payment date provided herein falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday, the payment obligation shall extend until the close of business of the next business day.
XVII. | MODIFICATION |
87. Modification of Consent Decree . The terms of this Consent Decree, including any Appendix other than Appendix 2, may be modified only by a subsequent written agreement signed by all the Parties. Where any such modification constitutes a material change to this Consent Decree, it shall be effective only upon approval by the Court.
50
88. BP Entities Consent to Modifications of Appendix 2 . The Trustees will provide a period for public comment on the proposed PDARP consistent with OPA regulatory requirements, including 15 C.F.R. § 990.23, and other legal requirements. Revisions to the proposed PDARP that the Trustees, in their discretion, decide to make in response to public comments may require the United States and the Gulf States to make conforming modifications to Appendix 2 to this Consent Decree. The BP Entities consent to modifications to Appendix 2 without further notice.
XVIII. | TERMINATION |
89. Request for Termination . BPXP may serve upon the United States and each of the Gulf States a request for termination, after BPXP has completed the requirements of Sections IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X, and XI (including all payments required by those Sections).
90. Motion for Termination . Following receipt by the United States and each of the Gulf States of BPXPs request for termination, the Parties shall confer informally concerning the request and any disagreement that the Parties may have as to whether BPXP has complied with the requirements for termination of this Consent Decree. If the United States, after consultation with the Gulf States, agrees that the Consent Decree may be terminated, the United States and BPXP shall submit, for the Courts approval, a joint stipulation terminating the Consent Decree.
91. Effect of Termination . Any termination of this Consent Decree shall not modify or diminish the Covenants Not to Sue and Reservations set forth in Section XIII, and any related definitions, all of which shall survive any termination of this Consent Decree. Appendix 2 of this Consent Decree also shall survive the termination of this Consent Decree and become a separate, freestanding agreement among the Trustees after such termination.
51
XIX. NOTICES AND SERVICE OF PROCESS
92. Identification of Recipients for Notices . Unless otherwise specified in this Consent Decree, whenever notifications, submissions, or communications are required by this Consent Decree, they shall be made in writing and addressed as follows, using both U.S. Mail and electronic mail where such addresses are provided:
As to the United States :
EES Case Management Unit
Environment and Natural Resources Division
U.S. Department of Justice
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
Re: DJ # 90-5-1-1-10026
Sharon D. Smith
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorneys Office, E.D. Louisiana
650 Poydras Street, Suite 1600
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130
Fax: (504) 589-4510
Email: sharon.d.smith@usdoj.gov
Director, Water Enforcement Division
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460
Assistant Administrator, Office of Water
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20460
Chief, Office of Claims and Litigation (CG-LCL)
United States Coast Guard Stop 7213
2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE
Washington, DC 20593-7213
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
Regional Director
1201 Elmwood Park Blvd.
New Orleans, LA 70125-2394
52
With a copy to:
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement
Office of the Director
1849 C Street, NW
Washington, DC 20240
General Counsel
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
U.S. Department of Commerce
1401 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington DC 20230
Fax: 202-482-4893
Phone: 202-482-4080
Attn: Chief, Natural Resources Section
Michele N. Laur
Senior Advisor
USDA, NRCS, Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Team (GCERT)
7578 Old Canton Road
Madison, MS 39110
Primary: 202-579-0585
Secondary: 601-607-3131 ext. 109
Fas: 844-325-7065
As to the State of Alabama :
Governor of Alabama
Attn: BP Litigation
State Capitol
600 Dexter Avenue
Montgomery, AL 36130
Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
c/o BP Litigation
501 Washington Avenue
Montgomery, AL 36130
Commissioner
Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources
Attn: BP Litigation
64 North Union Street, Room 468
Montgomery, AL 36130
53
As to the State of Florida :
General Counsel
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
3900 Commonwealth Blvd., M.S. 35
Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000
Deputy General Counsel for Enforcement
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
3900 Commonwealth Blvd., M.S. 35
Tallahassee, FL 32399-3000
General Counsel
Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission
620 South Meridian St.
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1600
Office of Attorney General
State of Florida
107 W. Gaines St
Tallahassee, FL 32301-2301
As to the State of Louisiana :
Office of Attorney General
State of Louisiana
Attn: Section Chief - Environmental
State of Louisiana
P.O. Box 94005
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9005
1885 N. Third Street
6th Floor
Baton Rouge, LA 70802-5159
And
Executive Director
Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority
P.O. Box 44027
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-4027
450 Laurel Street
Suite 1501
Baton Rouge, LA 70801
54
As to the State of Mississippi :
The Honorable Jim Hood
Attorney General State of Mississippi
Post Office Box 220
Jackson, MS 39205
As to the State of Texas :
Chief, Environmental Protection Division
(Attn: Thomas Edwards, AAG and Jane Atwood, AAG)
Office of the Attorney General (MC-066)
P.O. Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711-2548
Wm. P. Clements State Office Building
300 W. 15th St., Floor 10
Austin, TX 78701-1649
Phone: (512) 463-2012
Email: Thomas.Edwards@TexasAttorneyGeneral.gov and
Jane.Atwood@TexasAttorneyGeneral.gov
As to BPXP :
BP Exploration & Production Inc.
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: U.S. Company Secretary
with copies to each of the following:
BP Exploration & Production Inc.
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: Gulf of Mexico, Regional President
BP America
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: U.S. General Counsel
55
As to BPCNA :
BP Corporation North America Inc.
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: Company Secretary
with copies to each of the following:
BP Corporation North America Inc.
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: President
BP America
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: U.S. General Counsel
As to BP p.l.c. :
BP p.l.c.
1 St Jamess Square
London, SW1Y 4PD
United Kingdom
Attention: Company Secretary
with copies to each of the following:
BP p.l.c.
1 St Jamess Square,
London, SW1Y 4PD
United Kingdom
Attention: Group General Counsel
BP America
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: U.S. General Counsel
93. Change of Recipients for Notices . Any Party may, by written notice to the other Parties, change its designated notice recipient or notice address provided above.
94. Date of Service . Notices submitted pursuant to this Section shall be deemed served or submitted upon mailing, unless otherwise provided in this Consent Decree or by mutual agreement of the Parties in writing.
56
95. Acceptance of Service of Process . The Parties agree to accept service of process as by delivery at the addresses specified in Paragraph 92 or in accordance with Paragraph 93 with respect to all matters arising under or relating to this Consent Decree.
XX. | SIGNATURES |
96. Authority of Signatories . Each of the undersigned representatives certifies that he or she is fully authorized to enter into the terms and conditions of this Consent Decree, to execute this Consent Decree, and to legally bind to this Consent Decree the Party, affiliate or entity he or she represents.
97. Counterparts . This Consent Decree may be executed in counterparts, and its validity shall not be challenged on that basis.
98. Electronic and Facsimile Signatures . For purposes of this Consent Decree a signature page that is transmitted electronically ( e.g. , by facsimile or e-mailed PDF) shall have the same effect as an original.
IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated and entered in New Orleans, Louisiana, this day of , 2016.
|
HONORABLE CARL J. BARBIER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE |
57
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
EXECUTED by:
BPXP
Date: 9/28/2015 |
/s/ Brian D. Israel |
|||
Brian D. Israel | ||||
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP | ||||
601 Massachusetts Avenue, NW | ||||
Washington, DC 20001 |
BPCNA
Date: 9/28/2015 |
/s/ Eric L. Nitcher |
|||
Eric L. Nitcher | ||||
Assistant General Counsel, BPCNA | ||||
501 Westlake Park Blvd | ||||
Houston, Texas 77079 |
BP p.l.c.
Date: 9/28/2015 |
/s/ Daryl A. Libow |
|||
Daryl A. Libow | ||||
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP | ||||
1700 New York Avenue, NW | ||||
Washington, DC 20006 |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
FOR THE UNITED STATES:
Date: Oct 01 2015 |
/s/ John C. Cruden |
|||
JOHN C. CRUDEN | ||||
Assistant Attorney General | ||||
Environment & Natural Resources Division | ||||
U.S. Department of Justice |
Date: Oct 01 2015 |
/s/ Benjamin C. Mizer |
|||
BENJAMIN C. MIZER | ||||
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General | ||||
Civil Division | ||||
U.S. Department of Justice |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/17/2015 |
/s/ Cynthia Giles |
|||
CYNTHIA GILES | ||||
Assistant Administrator | ||||
Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance | ||||
United States Environmental Protection Agency |
Date: 9/17/2015 |
/s/ Kenneth J. Kopocis |
|||
KENNETH J. KOPOCIS | ||||
Deputy Assistant Administrator | ||||
Office of Water | ||||
Designated Natural Resource Trustee Official | ||||
United States Environmental Protection Agency |
Date: 9/17/2015 |
/s/ John Fogarty |
|||
JOHN FOGARTY | ||||
Associate Director | ||||
Office of Civil Enforcement | ||||
United States Environmental Protection Agency |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/18/2015 |
/s/ Ann Mills |
|||
ANN MILLS | ||||
Deputy Under Secretary for Natural Resources & | ||||
Environment | ||||
U.S. Department of Agriculture |
Date: 9/18/2015 |
/s/ Jeffrey Prieto |
|||
JEFFREY PRIETO | ||||
General Counsel | ||||
U.S. Department of Agriculture |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/21/2015 |
/s/ Stevan E. Bunnell |
|||
STEVAN E. BUNNELL | ||||
General Counsel | ||||
U.S. Department of Homeland Security |
Date: 9/21/2015 |
/s/ Steven D. Poulin |
|||
STEVEN D. POULIN | ||||
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard | ||||
Judge Advocate General |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/17/2015 |
/s/ Hilary Tompkins |
|||
HILARY TOMPKINS | ||||
Solicitor | ||||
Department of the Interior |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/21/2015 |
/s/ Lois J. Schiffer |
|||
LOIS J. SCHIFFER | ||||
General Counsel | ||||
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration |
Date: 9/21/2015 |
/s/ Christopher D. Doley |
|||
CHRISTOPHER D. DOLEY | ||||
Designated Trustee Representative | ||||
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP p.l.c., the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/14/2015 |
/s/ Robert Bentley |
|||
ROBERT BENTLEY | ||||
Governor | ||||
State of Alabama |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP p.l.c., the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/14/2015 |
/s/ Luther Strange |
|||
LUTHER STRANGE | ||||
Attorney General | ||||
State of Alabama |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP p.l.c., the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/14/2015 |
/s/ N. Gunther Guy, JR. |
|||
N. GUNTHER GUY, JR. | ||||
Commissioner | ||||
Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources |
Date: 9/14/2015 |
/s/ Dr. Berry H. Nick, JR. |
|||
DR. BERRY H. NICK TEW, JR. | ||||
State Geologist | ||||
Geological Survey of Alabama |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/15/2015 |
/s/ Rick Scott |
|||
RICK SCOTT | ||||
Governor | ||||
State of Florida |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/15/2015 |
/s/ Pam Bondi |
|||
PAM BONDI | ||||
Attorney General | ||||
State of Florida |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/15/15 |
/s/ Jon Steverson |
|||
JON STEVERSON | ||||
Secretary | ||||
Florida Department of Environmental Protection |
Date: 9/15/15 |
/s/ Eugene Nick Wiley |
|||
EUGENE NICK WILEY | ||||
Executive Director | ||||
Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/15/15 |
/s/ Bobby Jindal |
|||
BOBBY JINDAL | ||||
Governor | ||||
State of Louisiana |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/16/15 |
/s/ James D. Caldwell |
|||
JAMES D. CALDWELL | ||||
Attorney General | ||||
State of Louisiana |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/16/15 |
/s/ Kyle Graham |
|||
Kyle Graham | ||||
Executive Director, Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority | ||||
State of Louisiana | ||||
Date: 9/16/15 |
/s/ Brian Wynne |
|||
Brian Wynne | ||||
Director, Louisiana Oil Spill Coordinators Office | ||||
State of Louisiana | ||||
Date: 9/16/15 |
/s/ Peggy Hatch |
|||
Peggy Hatch | ||||
Secretary, Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality | ||||
State of Louisiana | ||||
Date: 9/16/15 |
/s/ Robert Barham |
|||
Robert Barham | ||||
Secretary, Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries | ||||
State of Louisiana | ||||
Date: 9/16/15 |
/s/ Stephen Chustz |
|||
Stephen Chustz | ||||
Secretary, Louisiana Department of Natural Resources | ||||
State of Louisiana |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/17/15 |
/s/ Phil Bryant |
|||
PHIL BRYANT | ||||
Governor | ||||
State of Mississippi |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/15/15 |
/s/ Jim Hood |
|||
JIM HOOD | ||||
Attorney General | ||||
State of Mississippi |
THE UNDERSIGNED PARTY enters into this Consent Decree among BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas in Deepwater Horizon MDL 2179 (E.D. La.).
Date: 9/15/15 |
/s/ Gary C. Rikard |
|||
GARY C. RIKARD | ||||
Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality | ||||
Executive Director | ||||
P.O. Box 2261 | ||||
Jackson, Mississippi 39225-2261 |
WE HEREBY CONSENT to the entry of the Consent Decree between BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the Gulf States in MDL 2179.
Date: 9/14/15 |
/s/ Greg Abbott |
|||
GREG ABBOTT | ||||
Governor | ||||
State of Texas |
WE HEREBY CONSENT to the entry of the Consent Decree between BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the Gulf States in MDL 2179.
Date: 9/15/15 |
/s/ Ken Paxton |
|||
Attorney General | ||||
State of Texas |
WE HEREBY CONSENT to the entry of the Consent Decree between BPXP, BPCNA, BP plc, the United States, and the Gulf States in MDL 2179.
TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE Natural Resource Trustee |
||
By: |
/s/ Anne Idsal |
|
Anne Idsal, Chief Clerk | ||
Texas General Land Office | ||
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Natural Resource Trustee |
||
By: |
/s/ Richard Hyde |
|
Richard Hyde, Executive Director | ||
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality | ||
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT Natural Resource Trustee |
||
By: |
/s/ Carter Smith |
|
Carter Smith, Executive Director | ||
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department |
[Appendices to the proposed consent decree are available on the Department of Justice website]
Exhibit 15.5
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE GULF STATES AND THE BP ENTITIES
WITH RESPECT TO ECONOMIC AND OTHER CLAIMS
ARISING FROM THE DEEPWATER HORIZON INCIDENT
I. RECITALS
1.1 Whereas, on the evening of April 20, 2010, a blowout, explosions, and fire occurred aboard the mobile offshore drilling unit Deepwater Horizon as it was in the process of temporarily abandoning a well, known as the Macondo Well, it had drilled within Block 252, Mississippi Canyon, on the Outer Continental Shelf off the coast of Louisiana;
1.2 Whereas, as a result of the blowout, explosions, and fire, oil and other substances were released into the Gulf of Mexico from approximately April 20, 2010 until July 15, 2010;
1.3 Whereas, pursuant to federal regulation, BPXP was the operator of the Macondo Well as of April 20, 2010;
1.4 Whereas, the release of oil and hydrocarbons originating in the Macondo Well and discharging from the Deepwater Horizon (and its appurtenances) on and after April 20, 2010 resulted in the presence of oil and other substances in the waters of the Gulf of Mexico and on beaches, marshes, and other land along the shore of the Gulf of Mexico, and, as a consequence, also resulted in the largest response, containment, cleanup, and restoration effort in the history of the United States;
1.5 Whereas, the State of Alabama filed a complaint on August 12, 2010, captioned Alabama v. BP PLC, Case No. 2:10-cv-690 (M.D. Ala), that was transferred to MDL 2179, where Alabama filed a first amended complaint on April 7, 2011, captioned Alabama v. BP PLC, Case No. 2:10-cv-4182 (E.D. La);
1.6 Whereas, the State of Florida filed a complaint on April 20, 2013, captioned Florida v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al., Case No. 5:13-cv-00123 (N.D. Fla.), that was transferred to MDL 2179;
1.7 Whereas, the State of Louisiana filed a first amended complaint on April 19, 2011, captioned Louisiana v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., et al., Case Nos. 11-cv-0516, 10-cv-03059 (E.D. La.), in MDL 2179;
1.8 Whereas, the State of Mississippi filed a complaint on April 18, 2013, captioned Hood v. BP Exploration & Production Inc. , et al. , Case No. 1:13-cv-00158 (S.D. Miss.), that was transferred to MDL 2179;
1
1.9 Whereas, the State of Texas filed a complaint on May 17, 2013, captioned Texas v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al. , Case No. 1:13-cv-315 (E.D. Tex.), that was transferred to MDL 2179, where Texas filed an amended complaint on June 18, 2013, captioned Texas v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al. , Case No. 13-cv-4677 (E.D. La.);
1.10 Whereas, on November 14, 2011, the Court entered an order dismissing Alabamas and Louisianas claims under state law, including for civil penalties, as being pre-empted by the federal Clean Water Act, In re Oil Spill by Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, No. 10-3059, 2011 WL 5520295 (E.D. La. Nov. 14, 2011);
1.11 Whereas, the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas and various affiliates collectively have asserted numerous claims against BPXP and other BP Entities that they allege arise from or are otherwise related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident, including, but not limited to, claims for economic loss, losses or damages related to Moratoria, losses related to closures of fishing and harvesting of natural resources, business interruption, breach of contract, loss of royalties, lost taxes and revenues, property damage, lost tourism revenue, response and removal costs, operating and other costs, other economic damages, punitive damages, and attorneys fees, costs, and expenses;
1.12 Whereas, those claims have been consolidated for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings in the multidistrict litigation, In Re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, MDL No. 2179 (E.D. La.), United States v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al. , No. 2:10-cv-04536 (E.D. La.), which proceedings have included discovery and other pretrial matters with respect to state compensatory claims in the Alabama compensatory trial and discovery and the completion of multiple phases of the limitation and liability trial conducted by the Court pursuant to certain pretrial orders;
1.13 Whereas, natural resource trustees appointed by the United States or the Gulf States have also asserted, or manifested an intent to assert, natural resource damages claims against BPXP and other BP Entities with respect to the Deepwater Horizon Incident;
1.14 Whereas, this Settlement Agreement is being entered into concurrently with a Consent Decree being entered in MDL 2179, and such Consent Decree fully and finally resolves any and all natural resource damages claims of the United States, the Gulf States, and their respective natural resource trustees, any and all Clean Water Act penalty claims, and certain other claims of the United States and the Gulf States;
1.15 Whereas, it is the intention of the Parties, by this Settlement Agreement, to fully and finally settle, satisfy, and resolve any and all claims (other than those natural resource damages claims, Clean Water Act claims, and other claims being separately settled and resolved by the Consent Decree) between the Gulf States, on the one hand, and the BP Entities, on the other, arising from or related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident;
1.16 Whereas, this Settlement Agreement will provide material benefits to all Parties by the fair and complete resolution of such claims in a timely manner without the need for further protracted litigation;
2
NOW, THEREFORE, without further adjudication, findings, or admissions of any issue of fact or law in connection with the Deepwater Horizon Incident other than those expressly set forth in this Settlement Agreement, and for good and valuable consideration, the undersigned Parties do hereby agree:
II. DEFINITIONS
2.1 Act of Insolvency means any one of the following: the presentation of a winding-up petition in respect of BP p.l.c., the making of an application for an administration order in respect of BP p.l.c., an application to court for an order convening meetings of creditors of BP p.l.c. to consider a scheme of arrangement under the Companies Act 2006 that would materially alter any Gulf States rights under this Settlement Agreement, the summoning of meetings of the creditors of BP p.l.c. (including any of the Gulf States) to consider a proposal for a company voluntary arrangement or other composition under the Insolvency Act 1986 that would materially alter any Gulf States rights under this Settlement Agreement, or the appointment of an administrative receiver, administrator or liquidator in respect of BP p.l.c. If in the case of a petition presented or application made by a creditor, contributory or other third party, such petition or application is stayed, dismissed or withdrawn within sixty (60) days of its filing, such petition or application shall not constitute an Act of Insolvency. For the purposes of this Paragraph, the term materially alter means an alteration to any Gulf States rights under the Settlement Agreement which reduces the amounts owed or payable, or extends the time at which payments are to be made to any Gulf State, or is otherwise materially prejudicial to any Gulf State.
2.2 BP Entities means one or more of the following: BP p.l.c., BPCNA, BPXP, and any parents, subsidiaries, successors, assigns, and all entities on any Group Structure list, which are publicly available and provided by BP p.l.c. to the Registrar of Companies, between 2010 and July 2, 2015, and, for each of the preceding, all of their current, future and former officers, directors, and employees.
2.3 BP p.l.c. means BP p.l.c., a company incorporated in England whose registered office is at 1 St. Jamess Square, London, SW1Y 4PD, England.
2.4 BPCNA means BP Corporation North America Inc., incorporated in the State of Indiana, with its current principal place of business in Houston, Texas.
2.5 BPXP means BP Exploration & Production Inc., incorporated in the State of Delaware, with its current principal place of business in Houston, Texas.
2.6 Change of Control means change of control of BP p.l.c. in the form of a takeover bid, tender offer or other merger transaction (however effected), that has become unconditional in all respects or otherwise effective, under which a third party or group of parties acting together acquires such number of shares in BP p.l.c. (or an interest in such shares) so as to carry more than 50% of the voting rights.
3
2.7 Claims means any and all claims or causes of action, whether in law or in equity, known or unknown, direct or indirect, past, present, or future, arising from or related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident, including, but not limited to: (1) Economic Claims; (2) any claims that were or could have been asserted by any Gulf State in MDL 2179; and (3) any claims for damages, liens, fines, penalties, costs, or criminal assessments, injunctive relief, or other liabilities or theories of damage that were or could have been asserted by any Gulf State in any civil, criminal, or administrative proceeding, including any and all claims for attorneys fees, costs, and expenses. For the avoidance of doubt, Claims includes any and all such claims or causes of action regardless of legal or equitable theory or nature under which they are based or advanced, including (but not limited to) legal and/or equitable theories under any federal, state, administrative, foreign, or international law, and including (without limitation) statutory law, codal law, regulation, common law, or equity, and whether based in maritime law, strict liability, negligence, gross negligence, punitive or exemplary damages, nuisance, trespass, and all other legal and equitable theories, whether existing now or arising in the future, arising from or in any way related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident. Notwithstanding the foregoing definition, solely the following claims or causes of action arising from or related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident shall not constitute Claims hereunder: (a) claims of the Gulf States for natural resource damages and Clean Water Act penalties to the extent that such claims are to be fully and finally settled and resolved pursuant to the Consent Decree; (b) claims brought by the Gulf States against the Transocean Entities and/or Halliburton Entities for punitive or exemplary damages arising from or related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident; (c) claims arising from any discharge or release of oil after the Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement from any one of the eight aliquots within Block 252, Mississippi Canyon, OCS Official Protraction Diagram, NH 16-10 three of which are owned or operated by BPXP or any BP Entity as of July 2, 2015; or (d) claims arising from the breach of, or seeking to enforce, this Settlement Agreement.
2.8 Consent Decree means a consent decree by and between the United States, the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, BPXP and other BP Entities, entered in MDL 2179, and fully and finally resolving, inter alia, Clean Water Act penalties, natural resource damages, federal False Claims Act claims, and federal royalty claims arising from the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
2.9 Court means the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
2.10 Deepwater Horizon Incident means events, actions, inactions, and/or omissions leading up to and including the following: (i) all discharges of hydrocarbons or other substances from the Macondo Well, and all discharges from, through, or into the Deepwater Horizon mobile offshore drilling unit (including its appurtenances) , occurring on or after April 20, 2010, regardless of any subsequent movement, migration, resuspension, or resurfacing of such hydrocarbons or other substances; (ii) the installation, construction, drilling and/or blowout of the Macondo Well; (iii) the explosion and fire on the Deepwater Horizon; (iv) the sinking and/or loss of the Deepwater Horizon; (v) any and all containment efforts related to the Macondo Well; (vi) construction of relief wells related to the Macondo Well; (vii) any and all cleanup, remediation, removal, response, and/or restoration efforts related to the foregoing, including, but not limited to, the Vessels of Opportunity program, the application of dispersants, and any diversion of fresh water; and (viii) operations of any claims facility related to any of the foregoing.
4
2.11 Economic Claims means any and all claims or causes of action by any Gulf State arising from or related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident for or related to economic loss, property damage, business interruption, breach of contract, loss of royalties, lost tourism revenue, lost taxes, losses arising from or related to Moratoria, losses related to closures of fishing and harvesting of natural resources, costs of public services or goods, operating costs, or any other costs, losses, or damages (other than natural resource damages to the extent such damages are to be fully and finally settled and resolved pursuant to the Consent Decree), including without limitation, any claim arising out of the Oil Pollution Act, 33 U.S.C. § 2702(b)(1) and/or § 2702(b)(2)(B)(F), state or federal common law, maritime law, or any other applicable provision of law.
2.12 Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement means the earliest date upon which all of the following have occurred: (a) the Settlement Agreement has been fully executed by all of the Parties hereto, and (b) the condition set forth in Paragraph 6.1 has been met.
2.13 Gulf State or Gulf States means the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas together with the Gulf States affiliates when used in the plural, and each of them individually and that respective Gulf States affiliates when used in the singular. A Gulf States affiliates shall include that Gulf States branches, agencies, associations, authorities, boards, bureaus, councils, departments, educational institutions or systems, components, public benefits corporations, or other instrumentalities of any kind, administrators, elected or unelected officials, officers or delegates (other than in their individual capacities), assigns, insurers, attorneys, or other agents of any kind; provided however that a Gulf States affiliates shall not include Local Governmental Entities.
2.14 Halliburton Entities means Halliburton Company and Halliburton Energy Services Inc.
2.15 Local Governmental Entities means counties, parishes, municipalities, or any other local governmental or local political subdivisions authorized by law to perform local governmental functions.
2.16 Macondo Well means: (a) Macondo Well 1 (including MC-252#1, Well No. 001ST00BP00, MC-252#1 ST1, Well No. 001ST00BP01), Macondo Well 2 (including MC-252#2, Well No. 003ST00BP00), and Macondo Well 3 (including MC-252#3, Well No. 002ST00BP00) within Block 252, Mississippi Canyon, OCS Official Protraction Diagram, NH 16 16-10 existing on or before the date of lodging of the Consent Decree; (b) the Deepwater Horizon and its appurtenances, including the riser from the Deepwater Horizon; (c) a coffer dam used in the course of removal work conducted during the discharge of oil from Block 252 of the Mississippi Canyon that began April 20, 2010; (d) the Macondo Well as defined in the United States Complaint in MDL 2179; and (e) the eight aliquots within Block 252, Mississippi Canyon, OCS Official Protraction Diagram, NH 16-10, three of which are owned or operated by BPXP or any BP Entity as of July 2, 2015.
2.17 MDL 2179 means the proceedings contained within the court proceedings captioned In Re: Oil Spill by the Oil Rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, on April 20, 2010, MDL No. 2179 (E.D. La.), United States v. BP Exploration & Production Inc., et al. , No. 2:10-cv-04536 (E.D. La.), including any and all claims or causes of action or theories of loss or damage that have been filed within, referred thereto, or otherwise consolidated thereunder.
5
2.18 Moratoria means any federal or state governmental action or inaction directed at offshore oil or gas industry activity including shallow water and deepwater operations that occurred on or after April 20, 2010, including, but not limited to, the federal moratoria on offshore permitting and drilling activities, effective date May 30, 2010 (NTL No. 2010-N04), the increased safety measures issues by the U.S. Department of the Interior, effective date June 8, 2010 (NTL No. 2010-N05), the information requirements issued by the U.S. Department of the Interior, effective date June 18, 2010 (NTL No. 2010-N06), the federal deepwater drilling suspensions on or about July 12, 2010, and any other new or revised safety rules, regulations, inspections, permitting practices, restrictions or suspensions.
2.19 Party or Parties means any one of the Gulf States or any one of BPXP, BPCNA, and BP p.l.c. when used in the singular and all of the Gulf States together with BPXP, BPCNA, and BP p.l.c. when used in the plural.
2.20 Settlement Agreement means this Agreement, all Attachments, and the Primary and Secondary Guaranty Agreements referenced herein.
2.21 Transocean Entities means Transocean Deepwater Inc., Transocean Holdings LLC, Transocean Inc., Transocean Ltd., Transocean Offshore Deepwater Drilling Inc., and Triton Asset Leasing GmbH, together with their parents, subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, employees, and agents.
III. SETTLEMENT PAYMENTS
3.1 Settlement Payment and Schedule. In consideration of the full and complete settlement and release of Claims, BPXP shall pay a total of four billion nine hundred million dollars ($4,900,000,000.00) to the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas on behalf of the Gulf States in accordance with the payment schedule and provisions set forth in Attachment 1.
3.2 Payment Instructions. Payments made to each state pursuant to the foregoing Paragraph 3.1 shall be directed according to the wiring instructions set forth in Attachment 2. Any of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, or Texas may modify its respective payment instructions set forth in Attachment 2 provided that any such modification is set forth in writing and such written instructions are received by BPXP, BPCNA, BP p.l.c., and the Court no later than sixty (60) days before any such payment is due.
IV. SATISFACTION, RELEASES, AND COVENANTS NOT TO SUE
4.1 Satisfaction and Settlement. This Settlement Agreement fully and finally satisfies, resolves, and settles any and all Claims between the Gulf States, on the one hand, and the BP Entities, on the other.
6
4.2 Release and Covenant Not to Sue BP Entities. The Gulf States each hereby fully, finally, and forever release and waive any and all Claims against the BP Entities and further covenant not to sue the BP Entities for any and all Claims.
4.3 Release and Covenant Not to Sue Third Parties. The Gulf States each hereby fully, finally, and forever release and waive any and all Claims, and further covenant not to assert any and all Claims, against any party who is or could be responsible or liable in any way for the Deepwater Horizon Incident, including those parties set forth in Attachment 3 and any parties related to those parties set forth in Attachment 3, except that, for the avoidance of doubt, this release and covenant not to sue shall not extend to the Gulf States claims for punitive or exemplary damages against the Transocean Entities or Halliburton Entities arising from or related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
4.4 Dismissal with Prejudice. No later than thirty (30) days after the Effective Date, the Gulf States shall dismiss and/or cause to be dismissed any and all previously filed Claims in MDL 2179 or any other proceedings against the BP Entities or any party covered by the release and covenant not to sue in Paragraph 4.3 (including those listed on Attachment 3) and take all steps as reasonably necessary, including the filing of appropriate dismissal pleadings, to implement the dismissal of such Claims. For the avoidance of doubt, such dismissal shall not extend to the Gulf States claims for punitive or exemplary damages against the Transocean Entities or Halliburton Entities arising from or related to the Deepwater Horizon Incident.
4.5 Effect on Local Governmental Entities. Those claims filed by the Gulf States in MDL 2179 have been filed solely on behalf of, and for the benefit of, each respective Gulf State and did not assert or preserve any claims on behalf of, or for the benefit of, any Local Governmental Entity; and the releases in Paragraphs 4.2 and 4.3 do not release any claims for any Local Governmental Entity.
4.6 Subrogation. As this Settlement Agreement is fully and completely settling and resolving the Claims, BPXP is hereby subrogated to any and all rights that any Gulf State may have for those Claims against any person who is a beneficiary of the releases and covenants not to sue set forth in Paragraph 4.3.
4.7 Attorneys Fees and Expenses. Each Party shall bear its own attorneys fees and associated costs and expenses, except as otherwise ordered by the Court.
V. FINANCIAL ASSURANCE
5.1 BPCNA as Primary Guarantor. Prior to the date of lodging of the Consent Decree, BPCNA shall and each beneficiary deliver an executed guaranty in the form of the Primary Guaranty in Attachment 4 of this Settlement Agreement, which guarantees the payments due to each of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas from BPXP pursuant to Paragraph 3.1 and Attachment 1 as primary guarantor in the event that BPXP defaults on such payments as set forth in Paragraph 5.3 below.
5.2 BP p.l.c. as Secondary Guarantor. Prior to the date of lodging of the Consent Decree,
7
BP p.l.c. and each beneficiary shall deliver an executed guaranty in the form of the Secondary Guaranty in Attachment 5 of this Settlement Agreement, which guarantees the payments due to each of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas from BPXP pursuant to Paragraph 3.1 and Attachment 1 as secondary guarantor in the event that both (a) BPXP defaults on such payments as set forth in Paragraph 5.3 below and (b) BPCNA defaults on its obligation to serve as primary guarantor of such payments as set forth in Paragraph 5.4 below.
5.3 BPXP Default. For the purposes of Paragraphs 5.1, 5.2, 5.4, and 5.7, BPXP shall be considered in default of a payment to a state required under this Settlement Agreement if any of the following conditions has been met:
A. BPXP has failed to make such payment within sixty (60) days after such payment has become due under the Settlement Agreement;
B. BPXP has filed for bankruptcy under the United States Bankruptcy Code or other applicable statute(s) or code(s) pertaining to insolvency; or
C. Any third party has petitioned a court to place BPXP in bankruptcy under the United States Bankruptcy Code or other applicable statute(s) or code(s) pertaining to insolvency, an order for relief has been entered, and any such filing or petition has not been dismissed within sixty (60) days of such order for relief.
5.4 BPCNA Default as Primary Guarantor. For the purposes of Paragraph 5.2, BPCNA shall be considered in default on its guaranty of a payment to a state required under the Settlement Agreement if BPXP has defaulted on such payment as described in Paragraph 5.3 and any of the following conditions has been met:
A. BPCNA has failed to make a payment required under the Primary Guaranty within sixty (60) days after a BPXP default;
B. BPCNA has filed for bankruptcy under the United States Bankruptcy Code or other applicable statute(s) or code(s) pertaining to insolvency; or
C. Any third party has petitioned a court to place BPCNA in bankruptcy under the United States Bankruptcy Code or other applicable statute(s) or code(s) pertaining to insolvency, an order for relief has been entered, and any such filing or petition has not been dismissed within sixty (60) days of such order for relief.
5.5 Successors and Assigns of Guarantors.
A. BPCNAs payment obligations under the Primary Guaranty shall be binding on any legal successor or assign of BPCNA, and a written agreement that such successor or assign shall so remain liable shall be included by BPCNA in the terms of any sale, acquisition, or merger of BPCNA with such successor or assign. Upon demonstration that any such successor or assign has become liable for BPCNAs obligations under the Primary Guaranty and upon written consent of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and Texas, BPCNAs obligations under the Primary Guaranty shall terminate. Any such termination shall be in writing, fully executed by the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas and BPCNA.
8
B. BP p.l.c.s payment obligations under the Secondary Guaranty shall be binding on any legal successor or assign of BP p.l.c., and a written agreement that such successor or assign shall so remain liable shall be included by BP p.l.c. in the terms of any sale, acquisition, or merger of BP p.l.c. with such successor or assign. Upon demonstration that any such successor or assign has become liable for BP p.l.c.s obligations under the Secondary Guaranty and upon written consent of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, BP p.l.c.s obligations under the Secondary Guaranty shall terminate. Any such termination shall be in writing, fully executed by the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas and BP p.l.c.
5.6 Alternative Financial Assurances. Upon the request of BPCNA or BP p.l.c. and written approval of any of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, or Texas, the Primary Guaranty and/or the Secondary Guaranty may be modified and/or replaced with an alternative form of financial assurance such as a letter of credit or trust agreement solely with respect to BPXPs payment obligations to the approving state(s) under this Settlement Agreement. Any such modification or replacement shall be in writing, fully executed by the approving state(s) and the BP Entity as to which such modification or replacement is made, and consented to in writing by the other states, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld.
5.7 Acceleration.
A. If there has been a Change of Control, the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas each may individually elect to accelerate the schedule for its payments required in Section III. In such case, the accelerated payments shall become due and owing one hundred twenty (120) days after service of notice of such election, or at any other time that the relevant Parties may agree upon.
B. If there has been an Act of Insolvency, the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas each may individually elect to accelerate the schedule for its payments required in Section III. In such case, the accelerated payments shall become due and owing immediately upon service of notice of such election, or at any other time that the relevant Parties may agree upon.
C. If there has been a Change of Control or Act of Insolvency, then BP p.l.c. shall notify the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas immediately.
VI. CONDITION
6.1 Condition. This Settlement Agreement shall be conditioned upon, and shall not become effective until, the Consent Decree has been entered by the Court.
9
VII. NOTICE
7.1 Notice. Any notice given pursuant to this Settlement Agreement shall be provided in writing and addressed to the Parties as set forth below. All notices shall be sent by one or more of the following methods: first class mail, registered or certified mail, or nationally recognized overnight delivery service, and shall be filed with the Court in MDL 2179 to the extent that MDL 2179 has not been terminated. Written notice shall be deemed to have been given to a recipient on the date it is delivered to the recipient at the address set forth below. Any Party may change its designated recipient or address for receiving notice by providing written notice of such change to the other Parties as set forth below. Notice consistent with Paragraph 7.1is considered sufficient notice as to all Parties. A change in the designated recipient or address for receiving notice shall not constitute a modification of this Settlement Agreement for the purposes of Paragraph 8.6 below.
Notice to the State of Alabama shall be sent to:
Governor of Alabama
Attn: BP Litigation
State Capitol
600 Dester Avenue
Montgomery, AL 36130
Attorney General
Office of the Attorney General
c/o BP Litigation
501 Washington Avenue
Montgomery, AL 36130
R. Cooper Shattuck
Office of Counsel, University of Alabama System
500 University Blvd. East
Tuscaloosa, AL 35401
Notice to the State of Florida shall be sent to:
Office of the Attorney General
Attn: Russell Kent, Special Counsel
PL-01, The Capitol
Tallahassee, FL 32399-1050
Phone: (850) 414-3854
Email: russell.kent@myfloridalegal.com
Or to the following street address:
10
Office of the Attorney General
107 W. Gaines St.
Tallahassee, FL 32301-2301
Notice to the State of Louisiana shall be sent to:
Office of Attorney General
State of Louisiana
Attn: Megan K. Terrell
Assistant Attorney General
Section Chief - Environmental
State of Louisiana
P.O. Box 94005
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9005
Phone: (225) 326-6708
Or to the following street address:
1885 N. Third Street
6 th Floor
Baton Rouge, LA 70802-5159
Notice to the State of Mississippi shall be sent to:
The Honorable Jim Hood
Attorney General State of Mississippi
Post Office Box 220
Jackson, MS 39205
Notice to the State of Texas shall be sent to:
Chief, Environmental Protection Division
(Attn: Thomas Edwards, AAG)
Office of the Attorney General (MC-066)
P.O. Box 12548
Austin, TX 78711-2548
Or to the following street address:
Wm. P. Clements State Office Building
300 W. 15 th St., Floor 10
Austin, TX 78701-1649
Phone: (512) 463-2012
Email: Thomas.Edwards@TexasAttorneyGeneral.gov
11
Notice to BPXP shall be sent to:
BP Exploration & Production Inc.
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: U.S. Company Secretary
with copies to each of the following:
BP Exploration & Production Inc.
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: Gulf of Mexico, Regional President
BP America
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: U.S. General Counsel
Notice to BPCNA shall be sent to:
BP Corporation North America Inc.
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: Company Secretary
with copies to each of the following:
BP Corporation North America Inc.
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: President
BP America
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: U.S. General Counsel
Notice to BP p.l.c. shall be sent to:
BP p.l.c.
1 St Jamess Square
London, SW1Y 4PD
United Kingdom
Attention: Company Secretary
12
with copies to each of the following:
BP p.l.c.
1 St Jamess Square,
London, SW1Y 4PD
United Kingdom
Attention: Group General Counsel
BP America
501 Westlake Park Boulevard
Houston, Texas 77079
Attention: U.S. General Counsel
VIII. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS
8.1 Successors and Assigns.
A. Any legal successor or assign of BPXP shall remain liable for the payment and other performance obligations of BPXP hereunder, and an agreement to so remain liable shall be included in the terms of any such sale, acquisition, or merger of BPXP. In the event of the sale, assignment, or transfer of some, but not all, of BPXPs assets to an unaffiliated third party pursuant to an arms length transaction, such third party shall not be liable for BPXPs obligations under this Settlement Agreement.
B. Except as provided in Paragraph 8.3, no portion of this Settlement Agreement shall provide any rights to, or be enforceable by, any person or entity other than a Gulf State and BPXP, BPCNA, and BP p.l.c., and no Gulf State may assign or otherwise convey any right to enforce any provision of this Settlement Agreement. Without limiting the foregoing, each Gulf State, and any permitted assignee of such Gulf State, agrees that any assignment of such Gulf States rights under Section III shall be with recourse to such Gulf State only and without recourse to any BP Entity.
8.2 Retention of Jurisdiction. The Court (and any appellate courts thereof) will retain exclusive jurisdiction over this Settlement Agreement for the purposes of enforcement of the Settlement Agreement and any dispute(s) arising thereunder. Any and all disputes, cases, or controversies concerning this Settlement Agreement, including, without limitation, disputes concerning the interpretation or enforceability of this Settlement Agreement, shall be filed in the Court and shall be accompanied by a legal request made on behalf of the complaining party (including any of the BP Entities or the Gulf States or any third party beneficiary) for such dispute to be made part of MDL 2179 if MDL 2179 has not been terminated. No action(s) to enforce this Settlement Agreement or regarding any dispute(s) arising thereunder shall be filed in any state court. The Parties agree not to contest federal jurisdiction in or consolidation with MDL 2179, or to contest jurisdiction or venue of the Court if MDL 2179 has been terminated by the time any dispute concerning this Settlement Agreement is filed. In all other respects and purposes unrelated to this Settlement Agreement or disputes concerning the interpretation or enforceability of this Settlement Agreement, the BP Entities specifically reserve any and all defenses to jurisdiction and venue of the Court, and the Gulf States agree that this Paragraph 8.2 does not constitute a waiver of such jurisdictional defenses, consent to jurisdiction, or an act supporting or sufficient to establish jurisdiction over the BP Entities for any matter besides disputes, cases, or controversies concerning this Settlement Agreement.
13
8.3 Third Party Beneficiaries.
A. Those third parties to whom the releases, covenants not to sue, and dismissals in Section IV of this Settlement Agreement extend constitute third party beneficiaries of this Settlement Agreement who may enforce such releases, covenants not to sue, and dismissals with respect to Claims asserted by any Gulf States against such third parties.
B. As set forth in Paragraphs 5.5 and 8.1.A, this Settlement Agreement shall also be binding on permitted successors and assigns of the applicable Parties and shall inure to the benefit of such successors and assigns.
C. Except as set forth in Paragraphs 8.3.A and 8.3.B above, this Settlement Agreement shall not inure to the benefit of any third party, does not create any rights on behalf of any third party, and is not enforceable by any third party.
8.4 Final Agreement. This Settlement Agreement constitutes the final, complete, and exclusive agreement and understanding between the BP Entities and the Gulf States with respect to the matters covered by this Settlement Agreement and supersedes any and all other agreements, written or oral, including the July 2, 2015 Agreement in Principle, between the BP Entities, on the one hand, and the Gulf States, on the other, with respect to the matters covered by this Settlement Agreement.
8.5 Effect of Further Proceedings or Appeals. This Settlement Agreement shall remain effective regardless of any appeals or court decisions relating in any way to the liability of those parties, persons, or entities that have been released or to whom the covenants not to sue run pursuant to Section IV.
8.6 Modification. This Settlement Agreement may only be modified by express written consent of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas and BPXP, BPCNA, and BP p.l.c., duly executed by their authorized representatives, except that:
A. Any one of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, or Texas (a Modifying State as used in this section) and BPXP may agree to modify the payment schedule with respect to payments to be made hereunder from BPXP to that Modifying State provided that such modification to the payment schedule is set forth in writing and duly executed by the authorized representatives of the Modifying State and BPXP, and consented to in writing by the other states, such consent not to be unreasonably withheld; and
B. A Modifying State and BPCNA or BP p.l.c., as the case may be, may modify the financial assurances as set forth in Section V in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 5.6.
14
Written notice of any modification to this Settlement Agreement shall be provided to all Parties hereto in the manner set forth in Paragraph 7.1.
8.7 Construction. Questions regarding the interpretation of this Settlement Agreement shall not be construed or resolved against any Party on the ground that this Settlement Agreement has been drafted by that Party. This Settlement Agreement is the result of review, negotiation, and compromise by each Party.
8.8 No Admissions. This Settlement Agreement is made without, and shall not constitute, an admission of any fact, law, liability, or wrongdoing by any BP Entity and is made purely by way of compromise and settlement.
8.9 Duty to Cooperate. The Parties shall cooperate, in good faith, to execute any documents, agreements, court filings, or other instruments required by the Settlement Agreement, including any dismissals of Claims, consent orders of the Court, final guaranties, payment instructions or acknowledgments, or any other such documents or modifications thereto.
8.10 Effect of Failure to Execute. If any of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi or Texas does not execute this Settlement Agreement, this Settlement Agreement shall become null and void as to all other Parties.
8.11 Signatories.
A. This Settlement Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original copy of the Agreement and all of which, when taken together, will constitute one and the same Settlement Agreement.
B. Each one of the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas hereby represents and warrants that (i) such Gulf States undersigned representative has authority to execute this Settlement Agreement on behalf of the respective Gulf State for whom the representative is signing and (ii) it has not sold or otherwise transferred or assigned any of the Claims or any interest in such Claims.
C. Each undersigned BP Entity hereby represents and warrants that its undersigned representative has authority to execute this Settlement Agreement on behalf of the BP Entity for whom the representative is signing.
D. BPCNA and BP p.l.c. are signing this Settlement Agreement, and shall be considered Parties to this Settlement Agreement, only for the purpose of binding BP p.l.c. and BPCNA to their respective obligations as guarantors pursuant to Section V of this Settlement Agreement.
8.12 Timing. In computing any period of time under this Settlement Agreement, the Primary Guaranty, or the Secondary Guaranty, where the last day would fall on a Saturday, Sunday, or federal holiday, the period shall run until 5 p.m. Central Time of the next business day.
15
For the State of Alabama |
||
By: |
/s/ Robert Bentley | |
Governor of the State of Alabama |
||
Date: |
9/14/2015 |
|
By: |
/s/ Luther Strange | |
Attorney General for the State of Alabama |
||
Date: |
9-14-15 |
16
For the State of Florida |
||
By: |
/s/ Pam Bondi | |
Attorney General for the State of Florida | ||
Date: |
9/15/15 |
|
By: |
/s/ Rick Scott |
|
Governor of the State of Florida | ||
Date: |
9/15/15 |
17
For the State of Louisiana |
||
By: |
/s/ Bobby Jindal | |
Bobby Jindal Governor of the State of Louisiana |
||
Date: |
September 15, 2015 |
|
By: |
||
James D. Buddy Caldwell Attorney General for the State of Louisiana |
||
Date: |
18
For the State of Louisiana |
||
By: |
||
Bobby Jindal Governor of the State of Louisiana |
||
Date: |
||
By: |
/s/ James D. Buddy Caldwell | |
James D. Buddy Caldwell Attorney General for the State of Louisiana |
||
Date: |
September 14, 2015 |
19
For the State of Mississippi |
||
By: |
/s/ Phil Bryant | |
Governor of the State of Mississippi | ||
Date: |
Sept, 14 2015 |
|
By: |
/s/ Jim Hood | |
Attorney General for the State of Mississippi | ||
Date: |
9/14/2015 |
20
For the State of Texas |
||
By: |
/s/ Greg Abbott |
|
Governor of the State of Texas | ||
Date: | 9/14/15 | |
By: |
|
|
Attorney General for the State of Texas | ||
Date: |
|
Approved: | ||||
TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE | ||||
By: |
|
|||
Anne Idsal, Chief Clerk | ||||
Texas General Land Office | ||||
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | ||||
By: |
|
|||
Richard Hyde, Executive Director | ||||
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality | ||||
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT | ||||
By: |
|
|||
Carter Smith, Executive Director | ||||
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department |
21
For the State of Texas |
||
By: |
|
|
Governor of the State of Texas | ||
Date: |
|
|
By: |
/s/ Ken Paxton |
|
Attorney General for the State of Texas | ||
Date: | 9/15/15 |
Approved: | ||||
TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE | ||||
By: |
|
|||
Anne Idsal, Chief Clerk | ||||
Texas General Land Office | ||||
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | ||||
By: |
|
|||
Richard Hyde, Executive Director | ||||
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality | ||||
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT | ||||
By: |
|
|||
Carter Smith, Executive Director | ||||
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department |
22
For the State of Texas |
||
By: |
||
Governor of the State of Texas |
||
Date: |
||
By: |
||
Attorney General for the State of Texas |
||
Date: |
Approved: | ||||
TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE | ||||
By: | /s/ Anne Idsal | |||
Anne Idsal, Chief Clerk | ||||
Texas General Land Office | ||||
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | ||||
By: | ||||
Richard Hyde, Executive Director | ||||
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality | ||||
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT | ||||
By: | ||||
Carter Smith, Executive Director | ||||
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department |
23
For the State of Texas |
||
By: |
||
Governor of the State of Texas |
||
Date: |
||
By: |
||
Attorney General for the State of Texas |
||
Date: |
Approved: | ||||
TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE | ||||
By: | ||||
Anne Idsal, Chief Clerk | ||||
Texas General Land Office | ||||
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | ||||
By: | /s/ Richard Hyde | |||
Richard Hyde, Executive Director | ||||
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality | ||||
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT | ||||
By: | ||||
Carter Smith, Executive Director | ||||
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department |
24
For the State of Texas |
||
By: |
||
Governor of the State of Texas |
||
Date: |
||
By: |
||
Attorney General for the State of Texas |
||
Date: |
Approved: | ||||
TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE | ||||
By: | ||||
Anne Idsal, Chief Clerk | ||||
Texas General Land Office | ||||
TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY | ||||
By: | ||||
Richard Hyde, Executive Director | ||||
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality | ||||
TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT | ||||
By: | /s/ Carter Smith | |||
Carter Smith, Executive Director | ||||
Texas Parks and Wildlife Department |
25
Gulf States Economic Claims Settlement Agreement
For BP Exploration & Production Inc. |
||
By: | /s/ Michael Daneker | |
Michael Daneker | ||
ARNOLD & PORTER LLP 601 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20001 |
||
Date: | 9-28-2015 |
For BP Corporation North America Inc. | ||
By: | /s/ Eric L. Nitcher | |
Eric L. Nitcher | ||
Assistant General Counsel, BPCNA | ||
501 Westlake Park Blvd | ||
Houston, Texas 77079 | ||
Date: | 9-28-2015 |
For BP p.l.c. | ||
By: | /s/ Daryl A. Libow | |
Daryl A. Libow | ||
SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP | ||
1700 New York Avenue NW | ||
Washington, DC 20006 | ||
Date: | 9-28-2015 |
26
ATTACHMENT 1
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
FOR STATE CLAIMS PAYMENT
Assumed Year*** |
Payments to
Alabama |
Payments to
Florida |
Payments to
Louisiana |
Payments to
Mississippi |
Payments to
Texas |
Total Annual
Payments by BPXP |
||||||||||||||||||
2016 |
$ | 100,000,000 | **** | $ | 400,000,000 | $ | 200,000,000 | $ | 150,000,000 | $ | 50,000,000 | $ | 900,000,000 | |||||||||||
2017 |
$ | 50,000,000 | $ | 50,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2018 |
$ | 50,000,000 | $ | 50,000,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2019 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2020 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2021 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2022 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2023 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2024 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2025 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2026 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2027 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2028 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2029 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2030 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2031 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2032 |
$ | 53,333,333 | $ | 106,666,666 | $ | 53,333,333 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,666 | $ | 259,999,998 | ||||||||||||
2033 |
$ | 53,333,338 | $ | 106,666,676 | $ | 53,333,338 | $ | 40,000,000 | $ | 6,666,676 | $ | 260,000,028 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 1,000,000,000 | $ | 2,000,000,000 | $ | 1,000,000,000 | $ | 750,000,000 | $ | 150,000,000 | $ | 4,900,000,000 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*** | The above schedule assumes the Settlement Agreement will have an Effective Date in 2016. The 2016 payments are due within ninety (90) days of the Effective Date. Each annual payment thereafter is due on the anniversary of the Effective Date. |
**** | Alabamas payment of $100,000,000 in (assumed year) 2016 shall be split equally between the two state accounts listed in Attachment 2. |
27
[Attachments to the settlement agreement are available on the website of the United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana]