Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 15, 2016.

 

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015

Commission file number 1-12260

Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Not Applicable

(Translation of registrant’s name into English)

United Mexican States

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Calle Mario Pani No. 100,

Santa Fe Cuajimalpa,

Cuajimalpa de Morelos,

05348, Ciudad de México, México

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

 

Roland Karig

Calle Mario Pani No. 100,

Santa Fe Cuajimalpa,

Cuajimalpa de Morelos,

05348 Ciudad de México, México

(52-55) 1519-5186/5121

krelations@kof.com.mx

(Name, telephone, e-mail and/or facsimile number and

address of company contact person)

 

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

        

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

American Depositary shares, each representing 10 Series L shares, without par value      New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
Series L shares, without par value      New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (not for trading, for listing purposes only)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:

None

The number of outstanding shares of each class of capital or common stock as of December 31, 2015 was:

 

992,078,519

   Series A shares, without par value

583,545,678

   Series D shares, without par value

497,298,032

  

Series L shares, without par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

 

x   Yes

   ¨   No

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

¨   Yes    x   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). N/A

 

¨   Yes    ¨   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

 

x   Yes    ¨   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large Accelerated filer   x

   Accelerated filer   ¨    Non-accelerated filer   ¨

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

 

U.S. GAAP   ¨

   IFRS   x    Other   ¨

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.

 

¨ Item 17    ¨ Item 18

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

 

¨   Yes

   x   No

 

 

 


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

          Page  
Introduction      1   
Item 1.    Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers      1   
Item 2.    Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable      1   
Item 3.    Key Information      2   
   Selected Consolidated Financial Data      2   
   Dividends and Dividend Policy      6   
   Exchange Rate Information      7   
   Risk Factors      8   
Item 4.    Information on the Company      15   
   The Company      15   
   Regulation      33   
   Bottler Agreements      40   
   Description of Property, Plant and Equipment      42   
   Significant Subsidiaries      44   
Item 4.A.    Unresolved Staff Comments      44   
Item 5.    Operating and Financial Review and Prospects      45   
Item 6.    Directors, Senior Management and Employees      61   
Item 7.    Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions      73   
   Major Shareholders      73   
   Related Party Transactions      76   
Item 8.    Financial Information      79   
   Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information      79   
   Legal Proceedings      79   
Item 9.    The Offer and Listing      80   
   Trading On The Mexican Stock Exchange      81   
Item 10.    Additional Information      81   
   Bylaws      81   
   Material Agreements      88   
   Taxation      88   
   Documents on Display      91   
Item 11.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk      92   
Item 12.    Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities      95   
Item 12.A.    Debt Securities      95   
Item 12.B.    Warrants and Rights      95   
Item 12.C.    Other Securities      95   
Item 12.D.    American Depositary Shares      95   

 

-ii-


Table of Contents
Item 13.    Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies      96   
Item 14.    Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds      96   
Item 15.    Controls and Procedures      96   
Item 16.A.    Audit Committee Financial Expert      98   
Item 16.B.    Code of Ethics      98   
Item 16.C.    Principal Accountant Fees and Services      98   
Item 16.D.    Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees      99   
Item 16.E.    Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers      99   
Item 16.F.    Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant      99   
Item 16.G.    Corporate Governance      99   
Item 16.H.    Mine Safety Disclosure      101   
Item 17.    Financial Statements      101   
Item 18.    Financial Statements      101   
Item 19.    Exhibits      101   

 

-iii-


Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

References

Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Coca-Cola FEMSA,” “our company,” “we,” “us” and “our” are used in this annual report to refer to Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

References herein to “U.S. dollars,” “US$,” “dollars” or “$” are to the lawful currency of the United States of America. References herein to “Mexican pesos” or “Ps.” are to the lawful currency of the United Mexican States, or Mexico.

As used in this annual report, “sparkling beverages” refers to non-alcoholic carbonated beverages. “Still beverages” refers to non-alcoholic non-carbonated beverages. Non-flavored waters, whether or not carbonated, are referred to as “waters.”

References to Coca-Cola trademark beverages in this annual report refer to products described in “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Our Products.”

Currency Translations and Estimates

This annual report contains translations of certain Mexican peso amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates solely for the convenience of the reader. These translations should not be construed as representations that the Mexican peso amounts actually represent such U.S. dollar amounts or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rate indicated. Unless otherwise indicated, such U.S. dollar amounts have been translated from Mexican pesos at an exchange rate of Ps.17.20 to US$1.00, the exchange rate for Mexican pesos on December 31, 2015, the last day in 2015 for which information is available, according to the U.S. Federal Reserve Board. On April 8, 2016, this exchange rate was Ps.17.76 to US$1.00. See “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rate Information” for information regarding exchange rates since January 1, 2011.

To the extent that estimates are contained in this annual report, we believe such estimates, which are based on internal data, are reliable. Amounts in this annual report are rounded, and the totals may therefore not precisely equal the sum of the numbers presented.

Sources

Certain information contained in this annual report has been computed based upon statistics prepared by the Mexican National Institute of Statistics and Geography ( Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía , or INEGI), the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board, the Mexican Central Bank ( Banco de México ), the Mexican National Banking and Securities Commission ( Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores, or the CNBV), local entities in each country and upon our estimates.

Forward-Looking Information

This annual report contains words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate” and similar expressions that identify forward-looking statements. Use of these words reflects our views about future events and financial performance. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors that may be beyond our control, including, but not limited to, effects on our company from changes in our relationship with The Coca-Cola Company, movements in the prices of raw materials, competition, significant developments in economic or political conditions in Mexico, Central and South America and Asia, including changes in currency exchange and interest rates, our ability to successfully integrate mergers and acquisitions, or changes in our regulatory environment. Accordingly, we caution readers not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. In any event, these statements speak only as of their respective dates, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any of them, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Item 1.      Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers

Not applicable.

Item 2.      Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable

Not applicable.

 

1


Table of Contents

Item  3.       Key Information

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

We prepared our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB, referred to herein as “IFRS.” Our date of transition to IFRS was January 1, 2011. Our consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were our first set of financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.

This annual report includes (under Item 18) our audited consolidated statements of financial position as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Pursuant to IFRS, the information presented in this annual report presents financial information in nominal terms that has been presented in Mexican pesos, taking into account local inflation of each hyperinflationary economic environment and converting from functional currency to Mexican pesos using the official exchange rate at the end of the period published by the local central bank of each country categorized as a hyperinflationary economic environment. Since January 2011, Venezuela has been the only country of the countries where we operate with a hyperinflationary economic environment. For each non-hyperinflationary economic environment, functional currency is converted to Mexican pesos using the year-end exchange rate for assets and liabilities, the historical exchange rate for equity and the average exchange rate for the income statement. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements.

Our non-Mexican subsidiaries maintain their accounting records in their local currency and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the country where they are located. For presentation in our consolidated financial statements, we adjust these accounting records into IFRS and report in Mexican pesos under these standards.

Except when specifically indicated, information in this annual report on Form 20-F is presented as of December 31, 2015 and does not give effect to any transaction subsequent to that date.

 

2


Table of Contents

The following table presents selected financial information of our company. This information should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, and the information in “ Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects. ” The selected financial information contained herein is presented on a consolidated basis, and is not necessarily indicative of our financial position or results at or for any future date or period. See Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for our significant accounting policies.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015 (1)     2015     2014     2013 (2)     2012 (3)     2011 (4)  
     (in millions of Mexican pesos or millions of
U.S. dollars, except ratio, share and per share data)
 

Income Statement Data:

            

Total revenues

   US$  8,861        Ps. 152,360        Ps. 147,298        Ps. 156,011        Ps. 147,739        Ps. 123,224   

Cost of goods sold

     4,671        80,330        78,916        83,076        79,109        66,693   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     4,190        72,030        68,382        72,935        68,630        56,531   

Administrative expenses

     372        6,405        6,385        6,487        6,217        5,140   

Selling expenses

     2,436        41,879        40,465        44,828        40,223        32,093   

Other income

     36        620        1,001        478        545        685   

Other expenses

     138        2,368        1,159        1,101        1,497        2,060   

Interest expenses

     369        6,337        5,546        3,341        1,955        1,729   

Interest income

     24        414        379        654        424        616   

Foreign exchange (loss) gain, net

     (85     (1,459     (968     (739     272        61   

(Loss) gain on monetary position for subsidiaries in hyperinflationary economies

     (2     (33     (312     (393     —         61   

Market value (gain) loss on financial instruments

     (8     (142     (25     (46     (13     138   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income taxes and share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method

     856        14,725        14,952        17,224        19,992        16,794   

Income taxes

     265        4,551        3,861        5,731        6,274        5,667   

Share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes

     9        155        (125     289        180        86   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

     600        10,329        10,966        11,782        13,898        11,213   

Equity holders of the parent

     595        10,235        10,542        11,543        13,333        10,662   

Non-controlling interest

     5        94        424        239        565        551   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

     600        10,329        10,966        11,782        13,898        11,213   

Ratio to Revenues (%)

            

Gross margin

     47.3        47.3        46.4        46.7        46.5        45.9   

Net income margin

     6.8        6.8        7.4        7.6        9.4        9.1   

 

3


Table of Contents
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2015 (1)     2015     2014     2013 (2)     2012 (3)     2011 (4)  
    (in millions of Mexican pesos or millions of
U.S. dollars, except ratio, share and per share data)
 

Balance Sheet Data:

           

Cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities

  US$ 930      Ps. 15,989      Ps. 12,958      Ps. 15,306      Ps. 23,234      Ps. 12,173   

Accounts receivable, net, inventories, recoverable taxes, other current financial assets and other current assets

    1,526        26,243        25,170        27,925        22,663        20,551   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

    2,456        42,232        38,128        43,231        45,897        32,724   

Investment in associates and joint ventures

    1,039        17,873        17,326        16,767        5,352        3,656   

Property, plant and equipment, net

    2,939        50,532        50,527        51,785        42,517        38,102   

Intangible assets, net

    5,278        90,754        97,024        98,974        67,013        62,163   

Deferred tax assets, other non-current financial assets and other non-current assets, net

    516        8,858        9,361        5,908        5,324        5,093   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

    12,228        210,249        212,366        216,665        166,103        141,738   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Bank loans and notes payable

    23        384        301        495        4,194        638   

Current portion of non-current debt

    179        3,086        905        3,091        945        4,902   

Interest payable

    24        411        371        324        194        206   

Suppliers, accounts payable, taxes payable and other current financial liabilities

    1,547        26,599        26,826        28,488        24,217        20,029   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

    1,773        30,480        28,403        32,398        29,550        25,775   

Bank loans and notes payable

    3,679        63,260        64,821        56,875        24,775        16,821   

Post-employment and other non-current employee benefits, deferred tax liabilities, other non-current financial liabilities and provisions and other non-current liabilities

    452        7,774        9,024        10,239        6,950        6,061   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

    4,131        71,034        73,845        67,114        31,725        22,882   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

    5,904        101,514        102,248        99,512        61,275        48,657   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity

    6,324        108,735        110,118        117,153        104,828        93,081   

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent (5)

    6,092        104,749        105,717        113,111        101,649        90,028   

Non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries

    232        3,986        4,401        4,042        3,179        3,053   

 

4


Table of Contents
    Year Ended December 31,  
    2015 (1)     2015     2014     2013 (2)     2012 (3)     2011 (4)  
    (in millions of Mexican pesos or millions of
U.S. dollars, except ratio, share and per share data)
 

Financial Ratios (%)

           

Current (6)

    1.38        1.38        1.34        1.33        1.55        1.27   

Leverage (7)

    0.93        0.93        0.93        0.85        0.58        0.52   

Capitalization (8)

    0.39        0.39        0.38        0.35        0.23        0.20   

Coverage (9)

    3.92        3.92        4.73        8.22        15.45        12.48   

Share Data

           

A Shares

    992,078,519        992,078,519        992,078,519        992,078,519        992,078,519        992,078,519   

D Shares

    583,545,678        583,545,678        583,545,678        583,545,678        583,545,678        583,545,678   

L Shares

    497,298,032        497,298,032        497,298,032        497,298,032        454,920,107        409,829,732   

Number of outstanding shares

    2,072,922,229        2,072,922,229        2,072,922,229        2,072,922,229        2,030,544,304        1,985,453,929   

Per Share Data

           

Book Value (10)

    2.94        50.53        51.00        54.57        50.06        45.34   

Earnings per share (11)

    0.29        4.94        5.09        5.61        6.62        5.72   

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges (12)

    3.22        3.22        3.40        5.71        9.81        8.09   

 

(1) Translation to U.S. dollar amounts at an exchange rate of Ps.17.20 to US$1.00 solely for the convenience of the reader.

 

(2) Includes results of Coca-Cola FEMSA Philippines, Inc., or CCFPI (formerly Coca-Cola Bottlers Philippines, Inc.), from February 2013 using the equity method, results of Grupo Yoli, S.A. de C.V., or Grupo Yoli, from June 2013, Companhia Fluminense de Refrigerantes, or Companhia Fluminense, from September 2013 and Spaipa S.A. Industria Brasileira de Bebidas, or Spaipa, from November 2013. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Corporate History.”

 

(3) Includes results of Grupo Fomento Queretano, S.A.P.I. de C.V., or Grupo Fomento Queretano, from May 2012. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Corporate History.”

 

(4) Includes results of Administradora de Acciones del Noreste, S.A.P.I. de C.V., or Grupo Tampico, from October 2011 and from Corporación de los Angeles, S.A. de C.V., or Grupo CIMSA, from December 2011. See “Item   4. Information on the Company—The Company—Corporate History.”

 

(5) We translated our results of operations in Venezuela for the full year ended December 31, 2015 into our reporting currency, the Mexican peso, using the SIMADI exchange rate of 198.70 bolivars to US$1.00, which was the exchange rate in effect as of such date. As a result, in 2015, we recognized a reduction in equity of Ps.2,687 million. See “Item   5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—General—Recent Developments in the Venezuelan Exchange Control Regime” and Note 2.3 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

(6) Computed by dividing Total current assets by Total current liabilities.

 

(7) Computed by dividing Total liabilities by Total equity.

 

(8) Computed by adding Current bank loans and notes payable, Current portion of non-current debt and Non-current bank loans and notes payable, and dividing such sum by the sum of Total equity and Non-current bank loans and notes payable.

 

(9) Computed by dividing Net cash flows from operating activities by the difference between Interest expense and Interest income.

 

(10) Based on 2,072.92 million ordinary shares as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, 2,030.54 million ordinary shares as of December 31, 2012 and 1,985.45 million ordinary shares as of December 31, 2011.

 

(11) Computed of the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period: 2,072.92 million in 2015 and 2014, 2,056.20 million in 2013, 2,015.14 million in 2012 and 1,865.55 million in 2011.

 

(12) Exhibit 7.2 to this annual report on Form 20-F includes a calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.

 

5


Table of Contents

DIVIDENDS AND DIVIDEND POLICY

The following table sets forth the nominal amount in Mexican pesos of dividends declared, paid and to be paid per share each year and the U.S. dollar amounts on a per share basis actually paid or to be paid to holders of American Depositary Shares, which we refer to as ADSs, on each of the respective payment dates.

 

Fiscal Year with Respect to which Dividend was Declared

   Date Dividend Paid or
To Be Paid
     Mexican Pesos per Share
(Nominal)
     U.S. Dollars per Share (1)  

2011

     May 30, 2012         2.770         0.121   

2012 (2)

     May 2, 2013         1.450         0.119   
     November 5, 2013         1.450         0.119   

2013 (3)

     May 2, 2014         1.450         0.111   
     November 5, 2014         1.450         0.111   

2014 (4)

     May 5, 2015         1.540         0.090   
     November 3, 2015         1.550         0.090   

2015 (5)

     May 3, 2016         1.670         —   (6)  
     November 1, 2016         1.680         —   (6)  

 

(1) Expressed in U.S. dollars using the applicable exchange rate when the dividend was paid.

 

(2) The dividend declared for the fiscal year 2012 was divided into two equal payments.

 

(3) The dividend declared for the fiscal year 2013 was divided into two equal payments.

 

(4) The dividend declared for the fiscal year 2014 was divided into two payments.

 

(5) The dividend declared for the fiscal year 2015 was divided into two payments.

 

(6) Since the dividend declared for the fiscal year 2015 has not been paid at the time of this annual report, the U.S. dollar per share amount has not been determined.

The declaration, amount and payment of dividends are subject to approval by a simple majority of the shareholders up to an amount equivalent to 20.0% of the preceding years’ retained earnings and by a majority of the shareholders of each of the Series A and Series D shares voting together as a single class above 20.0% of the preceding years’ retained earnings, generally upon the recommendation of our board of directors, and will depend upon our results, financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and the requirements of Mexican law. Accordingly, our historical dividend payments are not necessarily indicative of future dividends.

Holders of Series L shares, including in the form of ADSs, are not entitled to vote on the declaration and payment of dividends.

We pay all cash dividends in Mexican pesos. As a result, exchange rate fluctuations will affect the U.S. dollar amounts received by holders of our ADSs, which represent ten Series L shares, on conversion by the depositary for our ADSs of cash dividends on the shares represented by such ADSs. In addition, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Mexican peso and the U.S. dollar would affect the market price of our ADSs.

Under Mexican income tax law, dividends, either in cash or in kind, paid to individuals that are Mexican residents, and to individuals and companies that are non-Mexican residents, on our shares, including our Series L shares and our Series L shares represented by ADSs, are subject to a 10.0% Mexican withholding tax. See “Item   10. Additional Information—Taxation—Mexican Taxation.”

 

6


Table of Contents

EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high, low, average and period-end exchange rate expressed in Mexican pesos per U.S. dollar.

 

Period

   Exchange Rate  
       High      Low      Average (1)      End of Period  

2011

     14.25         11.51         12.43         13.95   

2012

     14.37         12.63         13.14         12.96   

2013

     13.43         11.98         12.76         13.10   

2014

     14.79         12.85         13.30         14.75   

2015

     17.36         14.56         15.87         17.20   

 

Source: U.S. Federal Reserve Board.

(1) Average month-end rates.

 

     Exchange Rate  
     High      Low      End of Period  

2014:

        

First Quarter

     13.51         13.00         13.06   

Second Quarter

     13.14         12.85         12.97   

Third Quarter

     13.48         12.93         13.43   

Fourth Quarter

     14.79         13.39         14.75   

2015:

        

First Quarter

     15.58         14.56         15.25   

Second Quarter

     15.69         14.80         15.69   

Third Quarter

     17.10         15.67         16.90   

Fourth Quarter

     17.36         16.37         17.20   

October

     16.89         16.38         16.53   

November

     16.85         16.37         16.60   

December

     17.36         16.53         17.20   

2016:

        

January

     18.59         17.36         18.21   

February

     19.19         18.02         18.43   

March

     17.94         17.21         17.21   

 

Source: U.S. Federal Reserve Board.

On April 8, 2016, the exchange rate was Ps.17.76 to US$1.00, according to the U.S. Federal Reserve Board.

 

7


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

Risks Related to Our Company

Our business depends on our relationship with The Coca-Cola Company, and changes in this relationship may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Substantially all of our sales are derived from sales of Coca-Cola trademark beverages. We produce, market, sell and distribute Coca-Cola trademark beverages through standard bottler agreements in the territories where we operate, which we refer to as “our territories.” We are required to purchase concentrate for all Coca-Cola trademark beverages from companies designated by The Coca-Cola Company, which price may be unilaterally determined from time to time by The Coca-Cola Company, in all such territories. We are also required to purchase sweeteners and other raw materials only from companies authorized by The Coca-Cola Company. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Our Territories.” Pursuant to our bottler agreements and as a shareholder, The Coca-Cola Company has the right to participate in the process for making certain decisions related to our business.

In addition, under our bottler agreements, we are prohibited from bottling or distributing any other beverages without The Coca-Cola Company’s authorization or consent, and we may not transfer control of the bottler rights of any of our territories without prior consent from The Coca-Cola Company.

The Coca-Cola Company also makes significant contributions to our marketing expenses, although it is not required to contribute a particular amount. Accordingly, The Coca-Cola Company may discontinue or reduce such contributions at any time.

We depend on The Coca-Cola Company to continue with our bottler agreements. Our bottler agreements are automatically renewable for ten-year terms, subject to the right of either party to give prior notice that it does not wish to renew the applicable agreement. In addition, these agreements generally may be terminated in the case of material breach. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Bottler Agreements.” Termination of any such bottler agreement would prevent us from selling Coca-Cola trademark beverages in the affected territory. The foregoing and any other adverse changes in our relationship with The Coca-Cola Company would have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The Coca-Cola Company and FEMSA have substantial influence on the conduct of our business, which may result in us taking actions contrary to the interests of our shareholders other than The Coca-Cola Company.

The Coca-Cola Company and Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V., which we refer to as FEMSA, have substantial influence on the conduct of our business. As of April 8, 2016, The Coca-Cola Company indirectly owned 28.1% of our outstanding capital stock, representing 37.0% of our capital stock with full voting rights. The Coca-Cola Company is entitled to appoint five of our maximum of 21 directors and the vote of at least two of them is required to approve certain actions by our board of directors. As of April 8, 2016, FEMSA indirectly owned 47.9% of our outstanding capital stock, representing 63.0% of our capital stock with full voting rights. FEMSA is entitled to appoint 13 of our maximum of 21 directors and all of our executive officers. The Coca-Cola Company and FEMSA together, or only FEMSA in certain circumstances, have the power to determine the outcome of all actions requiring approval by our board of directors, and FEMSA and The Coca-Cola Company together, or only FEMSA in certain circumstances, have the power to determine the outcome of all actions requiring approval of our shareholders. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—The Shareholders Agreement.” The interests of The Coca-Cola Company and FEMSA may be different from the interests of our other shareholders, which may result in us taking actions contrary to the interests of such other shareholders.

Changes in consumer preferences and public concern about health related issues could reduce demand for some of our products.

The non-alcoholic beverage industry is evolving mainly as a result of changes in consumer preferences and regulatory actions. There have been different plans and actions adopted in recent years by governmental authorities in some of the countries where we operate, including an increase in taxes or the imposition of new taxes on the sale of beverages containing certain sweeteners, and other regulatory measures, such as restrictions on advertising for some of our products. Moreover, researchers, health advocates and dietary guidelines are encouraging consumers to reduce their consumption of certain types of beverages sweetened with sugar and High Fructose Corn Syrup, or HFCS. In addition, concerns over the environmental impact of plastic may reduce the consumption of our products sold in plastic bottles or result in additional taxes that would adversely affect consumer demand. Increasing public concern about these issues, new or increased taxes, other regulatory measures or our failure to meet consumers’ preferences, could reduce demand for some of our products, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Business Strategy.”

 

8


Table of Contents

The reputation of Coca-Cola trademarks and trademark infringement could adversely affect our business.

Substantially all of our sales are derived from sales of Coca-Cola trademark beverages owned by The Coca-Cola Company. Maintenance of the reputation and intellectual property rights of these trademarks is essential to our ability to attract and retain retailers and consumers and is essential for our success. Failure to maintain the reputation of Coca-Cola trademarks and/or to effectively protect these trademarks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Competition could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The beverage industry in the territories where we operate is highly competitive. We face competition from other bottlers of sparkling beverages, such as Pepsi trademark products and other bottlers and distributors of local beverage brands, and from producers of low-cost beverages or “B brands.” We also compete in beverage categories other than sparkling beverages, such as water, juice-based beverages, teas, sport drinks and value-added dairy products. We expect that we will continue to face strong competition in our beverage categories in all of our territories and anticipate that existing or new competitors may broaden their product lines and extend their geographic scope.

Although competitive conditions are different in each of our territories, we compete mainly in terms of price, packaging, effective promotional activities, access to retail outlets and sufficient shelf space, customer service, product innovation and product alternatives and the ability to identify and satisfy consumer preferences. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Competition.” Lower pricing and activities by our competitors and changes in consumer preferences may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Water shortages or any failure to maintain existing concessions could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Water is an essential component of all of our products. We obtain water from various sources in our territories, including springs, wells, rivers and municipal and state water companies pursuant to either concessions granted by governments in our various territories (including governments at the federal, state or municipal level) or pursuant to contracts.

We obtain the vast majority of the water used in our production from municipal utility companies and pursuant to concessions to use wells, which are generally granted based on studies of the existing and projected groundwater supply. Our existing water concessions or contracts to obtain water may be terminated by governmental authorities under certain circumstances and their renewal depends on several factors, including having paid fees in full, having complied with applicable obligations and receiving approval for renewal from local and/or federal water authorities. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation—Water Supply.” In some of our other territories, our existing water supply may not be sufficient to meet our future production needs, and the available water supply may be adversely affected by shortages or changes in governmental regulations and environmental changes.

Water supply in the Sao Paulo region in Brazil has been reduced in recent years by low rainfall, which has affected the main water reservoir that serves the greater Sao Paulo area (Cantareira). Although our Jundiai plant does not obtain water from this water reservoir, water shortages or changes in governmental regulations aimed at rationalizing water in such region could affect our water supply in our Jundiai plant.

We cannot assure you that water will be available in sufficient quantities to meet our future production needs or will prove sufficient to meet our water supply needs. Continued water scarcity in the regions where we operate may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Increases in the prices of raw materials would increase our cost of goods sold and may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In addition to water, our most significant raw materials are (i) concentrate, which we acquire from affiliates of The Coca-Cola Company, (ii) sweeteners and (iii) packaging materials.

Prices for Coca-Cola trademark beverages concentrate are determined by The Coca-Cola Company as a percentage of the weighted average retail price in local currency, net of applicable taxes. The Coca-Cola Company has the right to unilaterally change

 

9


Table of Contents

concentrate prices or change the manner in which such prices are calculated. In the past, The Coca-Cola Company has increased concentrate prices for Coca-Cola trademark beverages in some of the countries where we operate. We may not be successful in negotiating or implementing measures to mitigate the negative effect this may have in the pricing of our products or our results.

The prices for our other raw materials are driven by market prices and local availability, the imposition of import duties and restrictions and fluctuations in exchange rates. We are also required to meet all of our supply needs (including sweeteners and packaging materials) from suppliers approved by The Coca-Cola Company, which may limit the number of suppliers available to us. Our sales prices are denominated in the local currency in each country where we operate, while the prices of certain materials, including those used in the bottling of our products, mainly resin, preforms to make plastic bottles, finished plastic bottles, aluminum cans, HFCS and certain sweeteners, are paid in, or determined with reference to, the U.S. dollar, and therefore may increase if the U.S. dollar appreciates against the applicable local currency. We cannot anticipate whether the U.S. dollar will appreciate or depreciate with respect to such local currencies in the future. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Raw Materials.”

Our most significant packaging raw material costs arise from the purchase of resin and plastic preforms to make plastic bottles and from the purchase of finished plastic bottles, the prices of which are related to crude oil prices and global resin supply. The average prices that we paid for resin and plastic preforms in U.S. dollars in 2015 decreased 24.0% as compared to 2014 in all our territories; however, given that high currency volatility has affected and continues to affect most of our territories, the average prices for resin and plastic preforms in local currencies were higher in 2015 in Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil. In 2015, average sweetener prices were lower in Guatemala, and were higher in the rest of our territories, in each case as compared to 2014. From 2010 through 2015, international sugar prices were volatile due to various factors, including shifting demand, availability and climate issues affecting production and distribution. In all of the countries where we operate, other than Brazil, sugar prices are subject to local regulations and other barriers to market entry that cause us to purchase sugar above international market prices. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Raw Materials.” We cannot assure you that our raw material prices will not further increase in the future. Increases in the prices of raw materials would increase our cost of goods sold and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Taxes could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

The countries where we operate may adopt new tax laws or modify existing tax laws to increase taxes applicable to our business or products. Our products are subject to certain taxes in many of the countries where we operate, which impose taxes on sparkling beverages. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation—Taxation of Sparkling Beverages.” The imposition of new taxes increases in existing taxes, or changes in the interpretation of tax laws and regulation by tax authorities may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Tax legislation in some of the countries where we operate has recently been subject to major changes. See “Item   4. Information on the Company—Regulation—Recent Tax Reforms.” We cannot assure you that these reforms or other reforms adopted by governments in the countries where we operate will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Regulatory developments may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We are subject to several laws and regulations in each of the territories where we operate. The principal areas in which we are subject to laws and regulations are water, environment, labor, taxation, health and antitrust. Laws and regulations can also affect our ability to set prices for our products. See “Item   4. Information on the Company—Regulation.” Changes in existing laws and regulations, the adoption of new laws or regulations, or a stricter interpretation or enforcement thereof in the countries where we operate may increase our operating and compliance costs or impose restrictions on our operations which, in turn, may adversely affect our financial condition, business, results of operations and prospects. In particular, environmental standards are becoming more stringent in several of the countries where we operate. There is no assurance that we will be able to comply with changes in environmental laws and regulations within the timelines established by the relevant regulatory authorities. See “Item   4. Information on the Company—Regulation—Environmental Matters.”

Voluntary price restraints or statutory price controls have been imposed historically in several of the countries where we operate. Currently, there are no price controls on our products in any of the territories where we have operations, except for those in Argentina, where authorities directly supervise five of our products sold through supermarkets as a measure to control inflation, and Venezuela, where price controls have been imposed on certain products, including bottled water, and a limit has been imposed on profits earned on the sale of goods, including our products, in an effort to seek price stability of, and equal access to, goods and services. If we exceed such limit on profits, we may be forced to reduce the prices of our products in Venezuela, which would in turn adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

 

10


Table of Contents

In addition, consumer protection laws in Venezuela are subject to continuing review and changes, and any such changes may have an adverse impact on us. We cannot assure you that existing or future laws and regulations in the countries where we operate relating to goods and services (in particular, laws and regulations imposing statutory price controls) will not affect our products, or that we will not need to implement voluntary price restraints, which could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Regulation—Price Controls.”

Unfavorable results of legal proceedings could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our operations have from time to time been and may continue to be subject to investigations and proceedings by antitrust authorities, and litigation relating to alleged anticompetitive practices. We also have been subject to investigations and proceedings on tax, consumer protection, environmental and labor matters. We cannot assure you that these investigations and proceedings will not have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. See “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.”

Weather conditions may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Lower temperatures, higher rainfall and other adverse weather conditions such as typhoons and hurricanes may negatively impact consumer patterns, which may result in reduced sales of our beverage offerings. Additionally, such adverse weather conditions may affect plant installed capacity, road infrastructure and points of sale in the territories where we operate and limit our ability to produce, sell and distribute our products, thus affecting our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may not be able to successfully integrate our acquisitions and achieve the expected operational efficiencies and/or synergies.

We have and we may continue to acquire bottling operations and other businesses. Key elements to achieving the benefits and expected synergies of our acquisitions and/or mergers are the integration of acquired or merged businesses’ operations into our own in a timely and effective manner and the retention of qualified and experienced key personnel. We may incur unforeseen liabilities in connection with acquiring, taking control of, or managing bottling operations and other businesses and may encounter difficulties and unforeseen or additional costs in restructuring and integrating them into our operating structure. We cannot assure you that these efforts will be successful or completed as expected by us, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects could be adversely affected if we are unable to do so.

Risks Related to the Series L shares and the ADSs

Holders of our Series L shares have limited voting rights.

Holders of our Series L shares are entitled to vote only in certain circumstances. In general terms, they may elect up to three of our maximum of 21 directors and are only entitled to vote on specific matters, including certain changes in our corporate form, mergers involving our company when our company is the merged entity or when the principal corporate purpose of the merged entity is not related to the corporate purpose of our company, the cancellation of the registration of our shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange or any other foreign stock exchange, and those matters for which the Ley del Mercado de Valores (Mexican Securities Market Law) expressly allows them to vote. As a result, Series L shareholders will not be able to influence our business or operations. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders” and “Item 10. Additional Information—Bylaws—Voting Rights, Transfer Restrictions and Certain Minority Rights.”

Holders of ADSs may not be able to vote at our shareholder meetings.

Our shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in the form of ADSs. Holders of our shares in the form of ADSs may not receive notice of shareholder meetings from our ADS depositary in sufficient time to enable such holders to return voting instructions to the ADS depositary in a timely manner.

 

11


Table of Contents

The protections afforded to non-controlling interest shareholders in Mexico are different from those afforded to minority shareholders in the United States and investors may experience difficulties in enforcing civil liabilities against us or our directors, officers and controlling persons.

Under the Mexican Securities Market Law, the protections afforded to non-controlling interest shareholders are different from, and may be less than, those afforded to minority shareholders in the United States. Therefore, it may be more difficult for non-controlling interest shareholders to enforce their rights against us, our directors or our controlling interest shareholders than it would be for minority shareholders of a U.S. company.

In addition, we are organized under the laws of Mexico and most of our directors, officers and controlling persons reside outside the United States, and all or a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of our directors, officers and controlling persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States on such persons or to enforce judgments against them, including in any action based on civil liabilities under the U.S. federal securities laws.

The enforceability against our directors, officers and controlling persons in Mexico in actions for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts, and liabilities predicated solely upon the U.S. federal securities laws will be subject to certain requirements provided for in the Mexican Federal Civil Procedure Code and any applicable treaties. Some of the requirements may include personal service of process and that the judgments of U.S. courts are not against Mexican public policy. The Mexican Securities Market Law, which is considered Mexican public policy, provides that in the event of actions derived from any breach of the duty of care and the duty of loyalty against our directors and officers, any remedy would be exclusively for the benefit of our company. Therefore, investors would not be directly entitled to any remedies under such actions.

Developments in other countries may adversely affect the market for our securities.

The market value of securities of Mexican companies is, to varying degrees, influenced by economic and securities market conditions in other countries. Although economic conditions are different in each country, investors’ reactions to developments in one country can have effects on the securities of issuers in other countries, including Mexico. We cannot assure you that events elsewhere will not adversely affect the market value of our securities.

Holders of Series L shares in the United States and holders of ADSs may not be able to participate in any capital offering and as a result may be subject to dilution of their equity interests.

Under applicable Mexican law, if we issue new shares for cash as a part of a capital increase, other than in connection with a public offering of newly issued shares or treasury stock, we are generally required to grant our shareholders the right to purchase a sufficient number of shares to maintain their existing ownership percentage. Rights to purchase shares in these circumstances are known as preemptive rights. By law, we may not allow holders of our shares or ADSs who are located in the United States to exercise any preemptive rights in any future capital increases unless (1) we file a registration statement with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, with respect to that future issuance of shares or (2) the offering qualifies for an exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended. At the time of any future capital increase, we will evaluate the costs and potential liabilities associated with filing a registration statement with the SEC, as well as the benefits of preemptive rights to holders of our shares in the form of ADSs in the United States and any other factors that we consider important in determining whether to file a registration statement.

We may decide not to file a registration statement with the SEC that would allow holders of our shares or ADSs who are located in the United States to participate in a preemptive rights offering. In addition, under current Mexican law, the sale by the ADS depositary of preemptive rights and the distribution of the proceeds from such sales to the holders of our shares in the form of ADSs is not possible. As a result, the equity interest of holders of our shares in the form of ADSs would be diluted proportionately. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Bylaws—Preemptive Rights.”

 

12


Table of Contents

Risks Related to the Countries Where We Operate

Adverse economic conditions in the countries where we operate may adversely affect our financial condition and results.

We are a Mexican corporation and our Mexican operations are our single most important geographic territory. We also conduct an important part of our operations in Brazil. For the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately 70% of our total revenues were attributable to Mexico and Brazil. In addition to Mexico and Brazil, we conduct operations in Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, and Argentina. Our results are affected by the economic and political conditions in the countries where we conduct operations. Some of these economies continue to be heavily influenced by the U.S. economy, and therefore, deterioration in economic conditions in the U.S. economy may affect these economies. Deterioration or prolonged periods of weak economic conditions in the countries where we conduct operations may have, and in the past have had, a negative effect on our company and a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our business may also be significantly affected by the interest rates, inflation rates and exchange rates of the local currencies of the countries where we operate. Decreases in growth rates, periods of negative growth and/or increases in inflation or interest rates may result in lower demand for our products, lower real pricing of our products or a shift to lower margin products. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.” In addition, an increase in interest rates would increase the cost to us of variable rate funding, which constituted approximately 24.0% of our total debt as of December 31, 2015, which would have an adverse effect on our financial position. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Interest Rate Risk.”

Consumer demand and preferences, real prices and the costs of raw materials are heavily influenced by macroeconomic and political conditions in the countries where we operate. These conditions vary by country and may not be correlated. In Venezuela, for example, we continue to face exchange rate risk as well as scarcity of and restrictions on importing raw materials.

Depreciation of the local currencies of the countries where we operate relative to the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our financial condition and results.

Depreciation of local currencies relative to the U.S. dollar increases the cost to us of some of the raw materials we acquire, the price of which may be paid in or determined with reference to U.S. dollars, and of our debt obligations denominated in U.S. dollars and may therefore negatively affect our results, financial position and equity. In addition, depreciation of local currencies of the countries where we operate relative to the U.S. dollar may also potentially increase inflation rates in such countries. Significant fluctuations of local currencies relative to the U.S. dollar have occurred in the past and may continue in the future, negatively affecting our results. See “Item 3. Key Information—Exchange Rate Information” and “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk.”

We have operated under exchange controls in Venezuela since 2003, which limit our ability to remit dividends abroad or make payments other than in local currency and that may increase the real price paid for raw materials and services purchased in local currency. Prior to 2014, we had historically used the official exchange rate in our Venezuelan operations. However, since the beginning of 2014, the Venezuelan government has announced a series of changes to the Venezuelan exchange control regime, approving alternative exchanges rates in addition to the official exchange rate. In January 2014, the Venezuelan government announced an exchange rate determined by the state-run system known as the Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas , or SICAD. In March 2014, the Venezuelan government announced a new law that authorized an alternative method of exchanging Venezuelan bolivars to U.S. dollars known as SICAD II. In February 2015, the Venezuelan government announced that it was replacing SICAD II with a new market-based exchange rate determined by the system known as the Sistema Marginal de Divisas , or SIMADI. In February 2016, the Venezuelan government announced a 37.0% devaluation of the official exchange rate and changed the existing three-tier exchange rate system into a dual system by combining the official exchange rate and the SICAD exchange rate into a single official exchange rate and maintaining the SIMADI exchange rate. In March 2016, the Venezuelan government announced that it was replacing the SIMADI exchange rate with a new market-based exchange rate known as Divisas Complementarias , or DICOM, and the official exchange rate with a preferential exchange rate denominated Divisa Protegida , or DIPRO. The DIPRO exchange rate is determined by the Venezuelan government and may be used to settle imports of a list of goods and raw materials which has not been published yet as of the date of this annual report. The DICOM exchange rate is determined based on supply and demand of U.S. dollars. As of April 8, 2016, the DIPRO and DICOM exchange rates were 10 bolivars and 306.07 bolivars per U.S. dollar, respectively. See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—General—Recent Developments in the Venezuelan Exchange Control Regime” and Note 2.3 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

13


Table of Contents

We translated our results of operations in Venezuela for the full year ended December 31, 2015 into our reporting currency, the Mexican peso, using the SIMADI exchange rate of 198.70 bolivars to US$1.00, which was the exchange rate in effect as of such date. As a result, in 2015, we recognized a further reduction in equity of Ps.2,687 million.

Based on our facts and circumstances, we anticipate using the DICOM exchange rate to translate our future results of operations in Venezuela into our reporting currency, the Mexican peso. The Venezuelan government may announce further changes to the exchange rate system in the future. To the extent a higher exchange rate is applied to our investment in Venezuela in future periods as a result of changes to existing regulations, subsequently adopted regulations or otherwise, our results of operations in Venezuela and financial condition would be further adversely affected. We will closely monitor any further developments in Venezuela, which may affect the exchange rates used by us to translate the results of our Venezuelan subsidiary in the future. More generally, future currency devaluations or the imposition of exchange controls in any of the countries where we operate may potentially increase our operating costs, which could have an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.

We selectively hedge our exposure to the U.S. dollar with respect to certain local currencies, our U.S. dollar-denominated debt obligations and the purchase of certain U.S. dollar-denominated raw materials. A severe depreciation of any currency of the countries where we operate may result in a disruption of the international foreign exchange markets and may limit our ability to transfer or to convert such currencies into U.S. dollars or other currencies for the purpose of making timely payments of interest and principal on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness or obligations in other currencies. While the Mexican government does not currently restrict, and since 1982 has not restricted, the right or ability of Mexican or foreign persons or entities to convert Mexican pesos into U.S. dollars or to transfer other currencies out of Mexico, the Mexican government could impose restrictive exchange rate policies in the future. Currency fluctuations may have an adverse effect on our results, financial condition and cash flows in future periods.

Political and social events in the countries where we operate and changes in governmental policies may have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

In recent years, some of the governments in the countries where we operate have implemented and may continue to implement significant changes in laws, public policy and/or regulations that could affect the political and social conditions in these countries. Any such changes may have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, prospects and financial condition. We cannot assure you that political or social developments in any of the countries where we operate, such as the election of new administrations, political disagreements, civil disturbances and the rise in violence and perception of violence, over which we have no control, will not have a corresponding adverse effect on the local or global markets or on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

 

14


Table of Contents
Item 4. Information on the Company

THE COMPANY

Overview

We are the largest franchise bottler of Coca-Cola trademark beverages in the world. We operate in territories in the following countries:

 

   

Mexico—a substantial portion of central Mexico, the southeast and northeast of Mexico (including the Gulf region).

 

   

Central America—Guatemala (Guatemala City and surrounding areas), Nicaragua (nationwide), Costa Rica (nationwide) and Panama (nationwide).

 

   

Colombia—most of the country.

 

   

Venezuela—nationwide.

 

   

Brazil—a major part of the states of Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais, the states of Parana and Mato Grosso do Sul and part of the states of Rio de Janeiro and Goias.

 

   

Argentina—Buenos Aires and surrounding areas.

 

   

Philippines—nationwide (through a joint venture with The Coca-Cola Company).

Our company was organized on October 30, 1991 as a stock corporation with variable capital ( sociedad anónima de capital variable ) under the laws of Mexico for a term of 99 years. On December 5, 2006, as required by amendments to the Mexican Securities Market Law, we became a publicly traded stock corporation with variable capital ( sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable ). Our legal name is Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. Our principal executive offices are located at Calle Mario Pani No. 100, Colonia Santa Fe Cuajimalpa, Delegación Cuajimalpa de Morelos, 05348, Ciudad de México, México. Our telephone number at this location is (52-55) 1519-5000. Our website is www.coca-colafemsa.com .

The following is an overview of our operations by consolidated reporting segment in 2015.

Operations by Consolidated Reporting Segment—Overview

Year Ended December 31, 2015

 

     Total Revenues     Gross Profit  
     (in millions of Mexican pesos, except percentages)  

Mexico and Central America (1)

   Ps. 78,709         51.7   Ps.  40,130         55.7

South America (2) (excluding Venezuela)

     64,752         42.5     27,532         38.2

Venezuela

     8,899         5.8     4,368         6.1
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated

   Ps.  152,360         100.0   Ps. 72,030         100.0

 

(1) Includes Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama.

 

(2) Includes Colombia, Brazil and Argentina.

Corporate History

We are a subsidiary of FEMSA, a leading company that participates in the beer industry through its ownership of the second largest equity stake in Heineken, one of the world’s leading brewers with operations in over 70 countries. FEMSA also participates in the retail industry through FEMSA Comercio, operating various small-format chain stores including OXXO, the largest and fastest-growing chain of stores in Latin America and the OXXO Gas chain of retail service stations for fuels, motor oils and other car care products. Additionally, through its strategic businesses, FEMSA provides logistics, point-of-sale refrigeration solutions and plastics solutions to FEMSA’s business units and third-party clients.

 

15


Table of Contents

We commenced operations in 1979, when a subsidiary of FEMSA acquired certain sparkling beverage bottlers in Mexico City and surrounding areas. In 1991, FEMSA transferred its ownership in the bottlers to FEMSA Refrescos, S.A. de C.V., our corporate predecessor. In June 1993, a subsidiary of The Coca-Cola Company subscribed for 30% of our capital stock in the form of Series D shares. In September 1993, FEMSA sold Series L shares that represented 19.0% of our capital stock to the public, and we listed these shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange and, in the form of ADSs, on the NYSE.

In a series of transactions since 1994, we have acquired new territories, brands and other businesses which today comprise our business. In May 2003, we acquired Panamerican Beverages Inc., or Panamco, and began producing and distributing Coca-Cola trademark beverages in additional territories in the central and gulf regions of Mexico and in Central America (Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama), Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil, along with bottled water, beer and other beverages in some of these territories.

In November 2006, FEMSA acquired 148,000,000 of our Series D shares from certain subsidiaries of The Coca-Cola Company, which increased FEMSA’s ownership to 53.7%.

In November 2007, we acquired together with The Coca-Cola Company 100.0% of the shares of capital stock of Jugos del Valle, S.A.P.I. de C.V., or Jugos del Valle. In 2008, we, The Coca-Cola Company and all Mexican and Brazilian Coca-Cola bottlers entered into a joint business for the Mexican and Brazilian operations, respectively, of Jugos del Valle.

In December 2007 and May 2008, we sold most of our proprietary brands to The Coca-Cola Company. The proprietary brands are now being licensed back to us by The Coca-Cola Company pursuant to our bottler agreements. In May 2008, we entered into a transaction with The Coca-Cola Company to acquire its wholly owned bottling franchise Refrigerantes Minas Gerais, Ltda., or REMIL, located in the State of Minas Gerais in Brazil.

In July 2008, we acquired the Agua de los Angeles bulk water business in Mexico City and surrounding areas from Grupo Embotellador CIMSA, S.A. de C.V., at the time one of the Coca-Cola bottling franchises in Mexico. The trademarks remain with The Coca-Cola Company. We subsequently merged Agua de los Angeles into our bulk water business under the Ciel brand.

In February 2009, we acquired together with The Coca-Cola Company the Brisa bottled water business in Colombia from Bavaria, S.A., a subsidiary of SABMiller plc. We acquired the production assets and the distribution territory, and The Coca-Cola Company acquired the Brisa brand.

In May 2009, we entered into an agreement to manufacture, distribute and sell the Crystal trademark water products in Brazil jointly with The Coca-Cola Company.

In August 2010, we acquired from The Coca-Cola Company, along with other Brazilian Coca-Cola bottlers, Leão Alimentos e Bebidas, Ltda., or Leão Alimentos, manufacturer and distributor of the Matte Leão tea brand, which would later be integrated with the Brazilian operations of Jugos del Valle.

In March 2011, we acquired together with The Coca-Cola Company, Grupo Industrias Lácteas, S.A. (also known as Estrella Azul), a Panamanian conglomerate that participates in the dairy and juice-based beverage categories in Panama.

In October 2011, we merged with Grupo Tampico, a Mexican bottler with operations in the states of Tamaulipas, San Luis Potosi, and Veracruz, as well as in parts of the states of Hidalgo, Puebla and Queretaro.

In December 2011, we merged with Grupo CIMSA, a Mexican Coca-Cola bottler with operations mainly in the states of Morelos and Mexico, as well as in parts of the states of Guerrero and Michoacan. As part of our merger with Grupo CIMSA, we also acquired a 13.2% equity interest in Promotora Industrial Azucarera, S.A de C.V., or PIASA.

In May 2012, we merged with Grupo Fomento Queretano, a Mexican bottler with operations mainly in the state of Queretaro, as well as in parts of the states of Mexico, Hidalgo and Guanajuato. As part of our merger with Grupo Fomento Queretano, we also acquired an additional 12.9% equity interest in PIASA.

In August 2012, we acquired, through Jugos del Valle, an indirect participation in Santa Clara Mercantil de Pachuca, S.A. de C.V., or Santa Clara, a producer of milk and dairy products in Mexico.

In January 2013, we acquired a 51.0% non-controlling majority stake in CCFPI from The Coca-Cola Company.

 

16


Table of Contents

In May 2013, we merged with Grupo Yoli, a Mexican bottler with operations mainly in the state of Guerrero, as well as in parts of the state of Oaxaca. As part of our merger with Grupo Yoli, we also acquired an additional 10.1% equity interest in PIASA, for a total ownership of 36.3% as of April 8, 2016.

In August 2013, we acquired Companhia Fluminense, a franchise that operates in parts of the states of Sao Paulo, Minas Gerais and Rio de Janeiro in Brazil. As part of our acquisition of Companhia Fluminense, we also acquired an additional 1.2% equity interest in Leão Alimentos.

In October 2013, we acquired Spaipa, a Brazilian bottler with operations in the state of Parana and in parts of the state of Sao Paulo. As part of our acquisition of Spaipa, we also acquired an additional 5.8% equity interest in Leão Alimentos, for a total ownership as of April 8, 2016 of 24.4%, and a 50.0% stake in Fountain Água Mineral Ltda., a joint venture to develop the water category together with The Coca-Cola Company.

For further information, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions—The Coca-Cola Company.”

Capital Stock

As of April 8, 2016, FEMSA indirectly owned Series A shares equal to 47.9% of our capital stock (63.0% of our capital stock with full voting rights). As of April 8, 2016, The Coca-Cola Company indirectly owned Series D shares equal to 28.1% of the capital stock of our company (37.0% of our capital stock with full voting rights). Series L shares with limited voting rights, which trade on the Mexican Stock Exchange and in the form of ADSs on the NYSE, constitute the remaining 24.0% of our capital stock.

 

LOGO

Business Strategy

We operate with a large geographic footprint in Latin America. In January 2015, we restructured the management of our operations as follows: (i) Mexico (covering certain territories in Mexico); (ii) Latin America (covering certain territories in Guatemala, and all of Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama, certain territories in Argentina, most of Colombia and all of Venezuela); (iii) Brazil (covering a major part of the states of Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais, the states of Parana and Mato Grosso do Sul and part of the states of Rio de Janeiro and Goias); and (iv) Asia (covering all of the Philippines through a joint venture with The Coca-Cola Company). Through this restructuring, we created a more flexible organizational structure to execute our strategies and continue with our track record of growth. We also aligned our business strategies more efficiently, ensuring a faster introduction of new products and categories, and a more rapid and effective design and deployment of commercial models.

To maximize growth and profitability and to create value for our shareholders and customers, we plan on executing the following key strategies: (i) continue evolving our commercial and client segmentation models to capture the industry’s long-term value potential; (ii) implement multi-segmentation strategies to target customers by consumption occasion, competitive environment and income level; (iii) implement well-planned product development, packaging, pricing and marketing strategies through different distribution channels; (iv) drive product innovation along our different product categories; (v) develop new businesses and distribution channels; and (vi) drive operational efficiencies throughout our organization to achieve the full operating potential of our commercial models and processes. In furtherance of these efforts, we intend to continue to focus on, among other initiatives, the following:

 

   

working with The Coca-Cola Company to develop a business model to continue exploring and participating in new lines of beverages, extending existing product lines and effectively advertising and marketing our products;

 

17


Table of Contents
   

developing and expanding our still beverage portfolio through innovation, strategic acquisitions and by entering into agreements to acquire companies with The Coca-Cola Company;

 

   

expanding our bottled water strategy with The Coca-Cola Company through innovation and selective acquisitions to maximize profitability across our market territories;

 

   

strengthening our selling capabilities and go-to-market strategies, including pre-sale, conventional selling and hybrid routes, in order to get closer to our customers and help them satisfy the beverage needs of consumers;

 

   

implementing selective packaging strategies designed to increase consumer demand for our products and to build a strong returnable base for the Coca-Cola brand;

 

   

replicating our best practices throughout the value chain;

 

   

rationalizing and adapting our organizational and asset structure in order to be in a better position to anticipate and respond to industry changes and trends in a competitive environment;

 

   

building a multi-cultural collaborative team, from top to bottom; and

 

   

broadening our geographic footprint through organic growth and strategic joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions.

We seek to increase sales of our products in the territories where we operate. To that end, our marketing teams continuously develop sales strategies tailored to our different customers across our various territories and distribution channels. We continue to develop our product portfolio to better meet market demand and maintain our overall profitability. To stimulate and respond to consumer demand, we continue to introduce new categories, products and presentations. See “—Product and Packaging Mix.” In addition, because we view our relationship with The Coca-Cola Company as integral to our business, we use market information systems and strategies developed with The Coca-Cola Company to improve our business and marketing strategies. See “—Marketing.”

We also continuously seek to increase productivity in our facilities through infrastructure and process reengineering for improved asset utilization. Our capital expenditure program includes investments in production and distribution facilities, bottles, cases, coolers and information systems. We believe that this program will allow us to maintain our capacity and flexibility to innovate and to anticipate and respond to consumer demand for our products.

As mentioned above, in 2015, we redesigned our corporate structure to strengthen the core functions of our organization. Through this restructuring we created specialized departments (centers of excellence) focused on manufacturing, distribution and logistics, commercial, and IT innovation areas. These departments not only enable centralized collaboration and knowledge sharing, but also drive standards of excellence and best practices in our key strategic capabilities. Our priorities include enhanced manufacturing efficiency, improved distribution and logistics, and cutting-edge IT-enabled commercial innovation.

We focus on management quality as a key element of our growth strategy and remain committed to fostering the development of quality management at all levels. Our Strategic Talent Management Model is designed to enable us to reach our full potential by developing the capabilities of our employees and executives. This holistic model works to build the skills necessary for our employees and executives to reach their maximum potential, while contributing to the achievement of our short- and long-term objectives. To support this capability development model, our board of directors allocates a portion of our yearly operating budget to fund these management training programs.

Sustainable development is a comprehensive part of our strategic framework for business operation and growth. We base our efforts in our core foundation, our ethics and values. We focus on three main areas, (i) our people, by encouraging the comprehensive development of our employees and their families; (ii) our communities, by promoting the generation of sustainable communities where we serve, an attitude of health, self-care, adequate nutrition and physical activity, and evaluating the impact of our value chain; and (iii) our planet, by establishing guidelines that we believe will result in efficient use of natural resources to minimize the impact that our operations might have on the environment and create a broader awareness of caring for our environment.

In our company we are conscious that weight issues and obesity are worldwide health problems, which need a collective effort for their solution. We believe that neither beverages nor any other product by itself is the direct cause of these problems, as they are complicated issues related to dietary habits and physical activity. However, as industry leaders, we would like to be a part of the solution. That is why we are committed to find, together with public and private institutions of the countries where we operate, a comprehensive solution to this problem. Through innovation, we have developed new products and expanded the availability of low

 

18


Table of Contents

or zero calorie beverages as well as bottled water in different presentations, adapted to consumers’ lifestyle. Approximately 40% of our brands are calorie free or low- or non-caloric beverages. In addition, we inform our consumers through front labeling on nutrient composition and caloric content of our beverages. We have been pioneers in the introduction of the Guideline Daily Amounts (GDA), and we perform responsible advertising practices and marketing. We voluntarily adhere to national and international codes of conduct in advertising and marketing, including communications targeted to minors which are developed based on the Responsible Marketing policies and Global School Beverage Guidelines of The Coca-Cola Company, achieving full compliance with all such codes in all of the countries where we operate. Moreover, we actively promote exercise, proper nutrition and healthy habits to promote an energetic balance, demonstrating our commitment to encourage physical activity among consumers. In general, more than 6.1 million people in 2015 benefited from physical activity events we sponsored, and more than 509,000 people in 2015 and 2.5 million people in the period from 2010 to 2015, benefited from our own health and physical activity programs.

At Coca-Cola FEMSA, we pledge to continue working to innovate and take measures to help people lead active and healthy lifestyles.

CCFPI Joint Venture

On January 25, 2013, as part of our efforts to expand our geographic reach, we acquired a 51.0% non-controlling majority stake in CCFPI from The Coca-Cola Company. We have an option to acquire the remaining 49.0% stake in CCFPI at any time during the seven years following the closing date. We also have a put option to sell our ownership in CCFPI to The Coca-Cola Company commencing on the fifth anniversary of the closing date and ending on the sixth anniversary of the closing date. We currently manage the day-to-day operations of the business; however, pursuant to our shareholders’ agreement with The Coca-Cola Company (a) during a four-year period ending January 25, 2017, all decisions must be approved jointly with The Coca-Cola Company, (b) following this four-year period, all decisions related to the annual normal operations plan and any other ordinary matters will be approved only by us, (c) The Coca-Cola Company has the right to appoint (and may remove) CCFPI’s chief financial officer, and (d) we have the right to appoint (and may remove) the chief executive officer and all other officers of CCFPI.

As of December 31, 2015, our investment under the equity method in CCFPI was Ps.9,996 million. See Notes 9 and 25 to our consolidated financial statements. CCFPI’s product portfolio in the Philippines consists of Coca-Cola trademark beverages and its total sales volume in 2015 reached 522.5 million unit cases. The operations of CCFPI are comprised of 19 production plants and serve close to 806,369 customers.

The Philippines presents significant opportunities for further growth. Coca-Cola has been present in the Philippines since the start of the 20th century and since 1912 it has been locally producing Coca-Cola products. The Philippines received the first Coca-Cola bottling and distribution franchise in Asia. Our strategic framework for growth in the Philippines is based on three pillars: portfolio, route to market and supply chain.

 

19


Table of Contents

Our Territories

The following map shows our territories, including CCFPI, our joint venture in the Philippines with The Coca-Cola Company, giving estimates in each case of the population to which we offer products and the number of retailers of our beverages as of December 31, 2015:

LOGO

 

20


Table of Contents

Our Products

We produce, market, sell and distribute Coca-Cola trademark beverages. The Coca-Cola trademark beverages include: sparkling beverages (colas and flavored sparkling beverages), waters and still beverages (including juice drinks, coffee, teas, milk, value-added dairy and isotonic drinks). The following table sets forth our main products as of December 31, 2015:

 

Colas:

   Mexico and
Central
America (1)
   South
America (2)
   Venezuela

Coca-Cola

   ü    ü    ü

Coca-Cola Light

   ü    ü    ü

Coca-Cola Zero

   ü    ü   

Coca-Cola Life

   ü    ü   

Flavored Sparkling Beverages:

              

Ameyal

   ü      

Canada Dry

   ü      

Chinotto

         ü

Crush

      ü   

Escuis

   ü      

Fanta

   ü    ü   

Fresca

   ü      

Frescolita

   ü       ü

Hit

         ü

Kist

   ü      

Kuat

      ü   

Lift

   ü      

Limon&Nada

   ü      

Mundet

   ü      

Naranja&Nada

   ü      

Quatro

      ü   

Schweppes

   ü    ü    ü

Simba

      ü   

Sprite

   ü    ü   

Victoria

   ü      

Yoli

   ü      

Water:

              

Alpina

   ü      

Aquarius (3)

      ü   

Bonaqua

      ü   

Brisa

      ü   

Ciel

   ü      

Crystal

      ü   

Dasani

   ü      

Manantial

      ü   

Nevada

         ü

 

21


Table of Contents

Other Categories:

   Mexico and
Central
America (1)
   South
America (2)
   Venezuela

Cepita (4)

      ü   

Del Prado (5)

   ü      

Estrella Azul (6)

   ü      

FUZE Tea

   ü       ü

Hi-C (7)

   ü    ü   

Santa Clara (8)

   ü      

Jugos del Valle (4)

   ü    ü    ü

Matte Leão (9)

      ü   

Powerade (10)

   ü    ü    ü

ValleFrut (11)

   ü    ü    ü

 

(1) Includes Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama.

 

(2) Includes Colombia, Brazil and Argentina.

 

(3) Flavored water. In Brazil, also a flavored sparkling beverage.

 

(4) Juice-based beverage.

 

(5) Juice-based beverage in Central America.

 

(6) Milk and value-added dairy and juices.

 

(7) Juice-based beverage. Includes Hi-C Orangeade in Argentina.

 

(8) Milk, value-added dairy and coffee.

 

(9) Ready to drink tea.

 

(10) Isotonic drinks.

 

(11) Orangeade. Includes Del Valle Fresh in Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Panama, Colombia and Venezuela.

 

22


Table of Contents

Sales Overview

We measure total sales volume in terms of unit cases and number of transactions. “Unit case” refers to 192 ounces of finished beverage product (24 eight-ounce servings) and, when applied to soda fountains, refers to the volume of syrup, powders and concentrate that is required to produce 192 ounces of finished beverage product. “Transactions” refers to the number of single units (e.g. a can or a bottle) sold, regardless of their size or volume or whether they are sold individually or in multipacks, except for fountain which represents multiple transactions based on a standard 12 oz. serving. Except when specifically indicated, “sales volume” in this annual report refers to sales volume in terms of unit cases.

The following table illustrates our historical sales volume for each of our consolidated territories.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015      2014      2013 (1)  
     (millions of unit cases)  

Mexico and Central America

        

Mexico

     1,784.5         1,754.9         1,798.0   

Central America (2)

     167.8         163.6         155.6   

South America (excluding Venezuela)

        

Colombia

     320.0         298.4         275.7   

Brazil (3)

     693.6         733.5         525.2   

Argentina

     233.9         225.8         227.1   

Venezuela

     235.6         241.1         222.9   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated Volume

     3,435.6         3,417.3         3,204.5   

 

(1) Includes volume from the operations of Grupo Yoli from June 2013, Companhia Fluminense from September 2013 and Spaipa from November 2013.

 

(2) Includes Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama.

 

(3) Excludes beer sales volume.

The total number of transactions reported in 2015 grew 0.7% to 20,279.6 million transactions as compared to 2014. Excluding our operations in Venezuela, the total number of transactions reported in 2015 would have grown 1.1% to 18,961.5 million as compared to 2014. On the same basis, total transactions reported for our sparkling beverage portfolio in 2015 would have grown 0.4% as compared to 2014, mainly driven by the positive performance in Mexico, Colombia, Argentina and Central America; total transactions reported for our still beverage category would have grown 6.0% as compared to 2014, mainly driven by Colombia, Mexico and Argentina; and total transactions reported for bottled water, including bulk water, would have grown 1.6% as compared to 2014, driven by the performance in Colombia and Argentina.

The number of transactions reported in 2015 in our Mexico and Central America division grew 2.4% to 10,877.1 million transactions as compared to 2014. The number of transactions reported for our sparkling beverage portfolio in 2015 in this division grew 2.8% as compared to 2014, mainly driven by a 2.9% growth in Mexico; transactions reported for our still beverage category in 2015 in this division increased by 6.1% as compared to 2014; and transactions reported for bottled water, including bulk water, decreased 6.4% as compared to 2014, driven by a 7.4% contraction in Mexico. In 2015, the total number of transactions in our Mexican operations and our Central American operations grew 2.3% and 2.8%, respectively, in each case as compared to 2014.

The number of transactions reported in 2015 in our South America division, excluding Venezuela, decreased 0.7% to 8,084.3 million transactions as compared to 2014. The number of transactions reported for our sparkling beverage portfolio in 2015 in this division decreased 2.7% as compared to 2014, driven by a contraction of 6.4% in Brazil which was partially offset by the positive performance in Colombia and Argentina; transactions reported for our still beverage category in 2015 in this division increased 5.9% as compared to 2014; and transactions reported for bottled water, including bulk water, grew 10.0% as compared to 2014. In 2015, the total number of transactions in our Brazilian operations decreased 6.6%, in our Colombian operation grew 9.6% and in our Argentine operations grew 5.5%, in each case as compared to 2014.

The number of transactions reported in 2015 in our Venezuela division decreased 3.6% to 1,318.1 million transactions as compared to 2014. The number of transactions reported for our sparkling beverage portfolio in 2015 in this division decreased 3.2% as compared to 2014, mainly driven by a contraction of 8.7% in our flavored sparkling beverage category; transactions reported for our still beverage category in 2015 in this division decreased 12.5% as compared to 2014; and transactions reported for bottled water, including bulk water, grew 5.3% as compared to 2014.

 

23


Table of Contents

Product and Packaging Mix

From the more than 113 brands and line extensions of beverages that we sell and distribute, our most important brand, Coca-Cola , together with its line extensions, Coca-Cola Light , Coca-Cola Life and Coca-Cola Zero, accounted for 60.8% of total sales volume in 2015. Our next largest brands, Ciel (a water brand from Mexico and its line extensions), Fanta (and its line extensions), Sprite (and its line extensions) and ValleFrut (and its line extensions) accounted for 11.1%, 4.7%, 2.9% and 2.9%, respectively, of total sales volume in 2015. We use the term line extensions to refer to the different flavors and low-calorie versions in which we offer our brands. We produce, market, sell and distribute Coca-Cola trademark beverages in each of our territories in containers authorized by The Coca-Cola Company, which consist of a variety of returnable and non-returnable presentations in the form of glass bottles, cans and plastic bottles mainly made of polyethylene terephthalate, which we refer to as PET.

We use the term presentation to refer to the packaging unit in which we sell our products. Presentation sizes for our Coca-Cola trademark beverages range from a 6.5-ounce personal size to a 3-liter multiple serving size. For all of our products excluding water, we consider a multiple serving size as equal to, or larger than, 1.0 liter. In general, personal sizes have a higher price per unit case as compared to multiple serving sizes. We offer both returnable and non-returnable presentations, which allow us to offer portfolio alternatives based on convenience and affordability to implement revenue management strategies and to target specific distribution channels and population segments in our territories. In addition, we sell some Coca-Cola trademark beverage syrups in containers designed for soda fountain use, which we refer to as fountain. We also sell bottled water products in bulk sizes, which refer to presentations equal to or larger than 5.0 liters, which have a much lower average price per unit case than our other beverage products.

The characteristics of our territories are very diverse. Central Mexico and our territories in Argentina are densely populated and have a large number of competing beverage brands as compared to the rest of our territories. Our territories in Brazil are densely populated but have lower consumption of beverage products as compared to Mexico. Portions of southern Mexico, Central America and Colombia are large and mountainous areas with lower population density, lower per capita income and lower consumption of beverages. In Venezuela, we face operational disruptions from time to time, which may have an effect on our volumes sold, and consequently, may result in lower consumption.

The following discussion analyzes our product and packaging mix by consolidated reporting segment. The volume data presented is for the years 2015, 2014 and 2013.

Mexico and Central America. Our product portfolio consists of Coca-Cola trademark beverages, including the Jugos del Valle line of juice-based beverages .

The following table highlights historical sales volume and mix in Mexico and Central America for our products:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015      2014     2013 (1)  
     (in percentages, except for total sales volumes)  

Total Sales Volume

       

Total (millions of unit cases)

     1,952.4         1,918.5        1,953.6   

Growth

     1.8         (1.8     4.4   

Unit Case Volume Mix by Category

  

Sparkling beverages

     74.0         73.2        73.1   

Water (2)

     20.2         21.3        21.2   

Still beverages

     5.8         5.5        5.7   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     100.0         100.0        100.0   

 

(1) Includes volume from the operations of Grupo Yoli from June 2013.

 

(2) Includes bulk water volumes.

 

24


Table of Contents

In 2015, multiple serving presentations represented 64.6% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Mexico, a 10 basis points increase compared to 2014; and 55.0% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Central America, a 30 basis points decrease compared to 2014. Our strategy is to foster consumption of single serve presentations while maintaining multiple serving volumes. In 2015, returnable packaging, as a percentage of total sparkling beverage sales volume accounted for 36.5% in Mexico, a 140 basis points decrease as compared to 2014; and 37.6% in Central America, a 280 basis points increase as compared to 2014.

In 2015, our sparkling beverages volume as a percentage of total sales volume in our Mexico and Central America division increased marginally to 74.0% as compared with 2014.

Total sales volume in our Mexico and Central America division reached 1,952.4 million unit cases in 2015, an increase of 1.8% compared to 1,918.5 million unit cases in 2014. The sales volume for our sparkling beverage category increased 3.0%, mainly driven by the performance of Coca-Cola brand products. Our bottled water portfolio, including bulk water, decreased 3.5%, mainly driven by a contraction of the Ciel brand in Mexico. Our still beverage category grew 5.8% mainly due to the performance of the Jugos del Valle portfolio, the Powerade brand and our Santa Clara dairy business in Mexico.

In 2014, multiple serving presentations represented 64.5% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Mexico, a 170 basis points decrease compared to 2013; and 54.7% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Central America, a 16 basis points decrease compared to 2013. Our strategy is to foster consumption of single serve presentations while maintaining multiple serving volumes. In 2014, returnable packaging, as a percentage of total sparkling beverage sales volume accounted for 37.9% in Mexico, a 290 basis points increase as compared to 2013; and 34.8% in Central America, a 150 basis points increase as compared to 2013.

In 2014, our sparkling beverages volume as a percentage of total sales volume in our Mexico and Central America division increased marginally to 73.2% as compared with 2013.

Total sales volume in our Mexico and Central America division (including Grupo Yoli) reached 1,918.5 million unit cases in 2014, a decrease of 1.8% compared to 1,953.6 million unit cases in 2013. The sales volume for our sparkling beverage category decreased 1.6%, mainly driven by the impact of price increase to compensate the excise tax to sweetened beverages. Our bottled water portfolio, excluding bulk water, grew 4.2%, mainly driven by the performance of the Ciel brand in Mexico. Our still beverage category decreased 5.5% mainly due to the performance of the Jugos del Valle portfolio in the division. Organically, excluding the non-comparable effect of Grupo Yoli in 2014, total sales volume for Mexico and Central America division reached 1,878.9 million unit cases in 2014, a decrease of 3.8% as compared to 2013. On the same basis, our sparkling beverage category decreased 3.9%, our bottled water portfolio, excluding bulk water, remained flat, and our still beverage category decreased 7.1%.

In 2013, multiple serving presentations represented 66.2% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Mexico (including Grupo Fomento Queretano and Grupo Yoli), a 10 basis points decrease compared to 2012; and 56.3% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Central America, a 50 basis points increase compared to 2012. In 2013, returnable packaging, as a percentage of total sparkling beverage sales volume, accounted for 35.0% in Mexico (including Grupo Fomento Queretano and Grupo Yoli), a 160 basis points increase compared to 2012; and 33.3% in Central America, a 30 basis points decrease compared to 2012.

In 2013, our sparkling beverages volume as a percentage of total sales volume in our Mexico and Central America division (including Grupo Fomento Queretano and Grupo Yoli) increased marginally to 73.1% as compared with 2012.

Total sales volume in our Mexico and Central America division (including Grupo Fomento Queretano and Grupo Yoli) reached 1,953.6 million unit cases in 2013, an increase of 4.4% compared to 1,871.5 million unit cases in 2012. The integration of Grupo Fomento Queretano and Grupo Yoli in Mexico contributed 89.3 million unit cases in 2013 of which sparkling beverages were 72.2%, water was 9.9%, bulk water was 13.4% and still beverages were 4.5%. Excluding the integration of these territories, volume decreased 0.4% to 1,864.2 million unit cases. Organically, our bottled water portfolio grew 5.1%, mainly driven by the performance of the Ciel brand in Mexico. On the same basis, our still beverage category grew 3.7% mainly due to the performance of the Jugos del Valle portfolio in the division. These increases partially compensated for the flat volumes in sparkling beverages and a 3.5% decline in the bulk water business.

South America (Excluding Venezuela). Our product portfolio in South America consists mainly of Coca-Cola trademark beverages, including the Jugos del Valle line of juice-based beverages in Colombia and Brazil, and the Heineken beer brands, including Kaiser beer brands, in Brazil, which we sell and distribute.

During 2013, as part of our efforts to foster sparkling beverage consumption in Brazil, we reinforced the 2.0-liter returnable plastic bottle for the Coca-Cola brand and introduced two single-serve 0.2 and 0.3 liter presentations. During 2014, in an effort to increase sales in our still beverage portfolio in the region, we reinforced our Jugos del Valle line of business and Powerade brand.

 

25


Table of Contents

The following table highlights historical total sales volume and sales volume mix in South America (excluding Venezuela), not including beer:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015     2014      2013 (1)  
     (in percentages, except for total sales volumes)  

Total Sales Volume

       

Total (millions of unit cases)

     1,247.6        1,257.7         1,028.1   

Growth

     (0.8     22.6         6.3   

Unit Case Volume Mix by Category

  

Sparkling beverages

     82.8        84.1         84.1   

Water (2)

     10.4        9.7         10.1   

Still beverages

     6.8        6.2         5.8   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     100.0        100.0         100.0   

 

(1) Includes volume from the operations of Companhia Fluminense from September 2013 and Spaipa from November 2013.

 

(2) Includes bulk water volumes.

Total sales volume in our South America division, excluding Venezuela, decreased 0.8% to 1,247.6 million unit cases in 2015 as compared to 2014, as a result of a volume contraction in Brazil which was partially compensated by volume growth in Colombia and Argentina. The still beverage category grew 7.5% mainly driven by the Jugos del Valle line of business in Colombia and the Cepita and Hi-C brands in Argentina. Our sparkling portfolio decreased 2.3% mainly driven by the volume contraction in Brazil. Our bottled water portfolio, including bulk water, increased 7.5% driven by the performance of the Aquarius , Kin and Bonaqua brands in Argentina, the Manantial and Brisa brands in Colombia and the Crystal brand in Brazil.

In 2015, returnable packaging, as a percentage of total sparkling beverage sales volume, accounted for 29.1% in Colombia, a decrease of 290 basis points as compared to 2014; 22.4% in Argentina, an increase of 270 basis points and 16.9% in Brazil a 140 basis points increase as compared to 2014. In 2015, multiple serving presentations represented 70.6%, 84.5% and 75.7% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Colombia, Argentina and Brazil, respectively.

Total sales volume in our South America division, excluding Venezuela, increased 22.6% to 1,257.7 million unit cases in 2014 as compared to 2013, as a result of stronger sales volumes in our recently integrated territories in Brazil and better volume performance in Colombia. The still beverage category grew 31.8% mainly driven by the Jugos del Valle line of business in Colombia and Brazil and the performance of FUZE tea and Leão tea in the division. Our sparkling portfolio increased 22.6% mainly driven by the performance of the Coca-Cola brand and other core products in our operations. Our bottled water portfolio, including bulk water, increased 16.9% driven by performance of the Bonaqua brand in Argentina and the Crystal brand in Brazil. Organically, excluding the non-comparable effect of Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa in 2014, total sales volume in South America division excluding Venezuela, increased 3.7% as compared to 2013. On the same basis, our still beverage category grew 15.3% mainly driven by the Jugos del Valle line of business in the region, our bottled water portfolio, including bulk water, increased 6.9% mainly driven by the performance of the Crystal brand in Brazil, and our sparkling beverage category increased 2.5%.

In 2014, returnable packaging, as a percentage of total sparkling beverage sales volume, accounted for 32.0% in Colombia, a decrease of 520 basis points as compared to 2013; 19.7% in Argentina, a decrease of 230 basis points; and 15.5% in Brazil, a 50 basis points decrease compared to 2013. In 2014, multiple serving presentations represented 69.8%, 85.3% and 75.0% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Colombia, Argentina and Brazil, respectively.

Total sales volume in our South America division, excluding Venezuela, increased 6.3% to 1,028.1 million unit cases in 2013 as compared to 2012, as a result of growth in Colombia and Argentina and the integration of Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa in our Brazilian territories. These effects compensated for an organic volume decline in Brazil. Organically, excluding the non-comparable effect of Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa, volumes remained flat as compared with the previous year. On the same basis, the still beverage category grew 14.3%, mainly driven by the Jugos del Valle line of business in Colombia and Brazil and the performance of FUZE tea in the division. Our bottled water portfolio, including bulk water, increased 3.8% mainly driven by the Bonaqua brand in Argentina and the Brisa brand in Colombia. These increases compensated for a 1.2% decline in the sparkling beverage portfolio.

 

26


Table of Contents

In 2013, returnable packaging, as a percentage of total sparkling beverage sales volume, accounted for 37.2% in Colombia, a decrease of 320 basis points as compared to 2012; 22.0% in Argentina, a decrease of 690 basis points; and 16.0% in Brazil, excluding the non-comparable effect of Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa, a 170 basis points increase compared to 2012. In 2013, multiple serving presentations represented 66.7%, 85.2% and 72.9% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Colombia, Argentina and Brazil on an organic basis, respectively.

We continue to distribute and sell the Heineken beer portfolio, including Kaiser beer brands, in our Brazilian territories through the 20-year term, consistent with the arrangements in place since 2003 with Cervejarias Kaiser, a subsidiary of the Heineken Group. Beginning in the second quarter of 2005, we ceased including beer that we distribute in Brazil in our reported sales volumes.

Venezuela. Our product portfolio in Venezuela consists of Coca-Cola trademark beverages.

The following table highlights historical total sales volume and sales volume mix in Venezuela:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015     2014      2013  
     (in percentages, except for total sales volumes)  

Total Sales Volume

       

Total (millions of unit cases)

     235.6        241.1         222.9   

Growth

     (2.3     8.2         7.3   

Unit Case Volume Mix by Category

       

Sparkling beverages

     86.2        85.7         85.6   

Water (1)

     6.8        6.5         6.9   

Still beverages

     7.0        7.8         7.5   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     100.0        100.0         100.0   

 

(1) Includes bulk water volumes.

We have implemented a product portfolio rationalization strategy that allows us to minimize the impact of certain operating disruptions that have been recurrent in Venezuela over the last several years related to difficulties in accessing raw materials due to the delay in obtaining the corresponding import authorizations and the Venezuelan exchange controls. In addition, from time to time, we experience operating disruptions due to prolonged negotiations of collective bargaining agreements.

Total sales volume decreased 2.3% to 235.6 million unit cases in 2015, as compared to 241.1 million unit cases in 2014. The sales volume in the sparkling beverage category decreased 2.1%, driven by a contraction in our flavored sparkling beverage portfolio, which was partially compensated by the positive performance of the Coca-Cola brand, which grew 3.4%. The bottled water business, including bulk water, grew 6.1% mainly driven by the Nevada brand. The still beverage category decreased 11.3%.

In 2015, multiple serving presentations represented 82.4% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Venezuela, a 50 basis points increase as compared to 2014. In 2015, returnable presentations represented 6.9% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Venezuela, which remained flat as compared to 2014.

Total sales volume increased 8.2% to 241.1 million unit cases in 2014, as compared to 222.9 million unit cases in 2013. The sales volume in the sparkling beverage category grew 8.3%, driven by the strong performance of the Coca-Cola brand, which grew 15.3%. The bottled water business, including bulk water, grew 1.6% mainly driven by the Nevada brand. The still beverage category increased 10.8%, due to the performance of the Del Valle Fresh orangeade and Powerade brand.

In 2014, multiple serving presentations represented 81.9% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Venezuela, a 100 basis points increase as compared to 2013. In 2014, returnable presentations represented 6.9% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Venezuela, a 20 basis points increase as compared to 2013.

Total sales volume increased 7.3% to 222.9 million unit cases in 2013, as compared to 207.7 million unit cases in 2012. The sales volume in the sparkling beverage category grew 4.5%, driven by the strong performance of the Coca-Cola brand, which grew 10.0%. The bottled water business, including bulk water, grew 33.2% mainly driven by the Nevada brand. The still beverage category increased 23.5%, due to the performance of the Del Valle Fresh orangeade and Kapo .

 

27


Table of Contents

In 2013, multiple serving presentations represented 80.9% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Venezuela, a 100 basis points increase compared to 2012. In 2013, returnable presentations represented 6.8% of total sparkling beverages sales volume in Venezuela, an 80 basis points decrease compared to 2012.

Seasonality

Sales of our products are seasonal in all of the countries where we operate, as our sales volumes generally increase during the summer of each country and during the year-end holiday season. In Mexico, Central America, Colombia and Venezuela, we typically achieve our highest sales during the summer months of April through September as well as during the year-end holidays in December. In Brazil and Argentina, our highest sales levels occur during the summer months of October through March and the year-end holidays in December.

Marketing

We, in conjunction with The Coca-Cola Company, have developed a marketing strategy to promote the sale and consumption of our products. We rely extensively on advertising, sales promotions and retailer support programs to target the particular preferences of our consumers. Our consolidated marketing expenses in 2015, net of contributions by The Coca-Cola Company, were Ps.3,447 million. The Coca-Cola Company contributed an additional Ps.3,749 million in 2015, which mainly includes contributions for coolers, bottles and cases. Through the use of advanced information technology, we have collected customer and consumer information that allow us to tailor our marketing strategies to target different types of customers located in each of our territories and to meet the specific needs of the various markets we serve.

Retailer Support Programs . Support programs include providing retailers with point-of-sale display materials and consumer sales promotions, such as contests, sweepstakes and the giveaway of product samples.

Coolers . Coolers play an integral role in our clients’ plans for success. Increasing both cooler coverage and the number of cooler doors among our retailers is important to ensure that our wide variety of products are properly displayed, while strengthening our merchandising capacity in the traditional sales channel to significantly improve our point-of-sale execution.

Advertising . We advertise in all major communications media. We focus our advertising efforts on increasing brand recognition by consumers and improving our customer relations. National advertising campaigns are designed and proposed by The Coca-Cola Company’s local affiliates in the countries where we operate, with our input at the local or regional level. Point-of-sale merchandising and advertising efforts are proposed and implemented by us, with a focus on increasing our connection with customers and consumers.

Channel Marketing . In order to provide more dynamic and specialized marketing of our products, our strategy is to classify our markets and develop targeted efforts for each consumer segment or distribution channel. Our principal channels are small retailers, “on-premise” accounts, such as restaurants and bars, supermarkets and third party distributors. Presence in these channels entails a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the purchasing patterns and preferences of various groups of beverage consumers in each of the different types of locations or distribution channels. In response to this analysis, we tailor our product, price, packaging and distribution strategies to meet the particular needs of and exploit the potential of each channel.

Multi-Segmentation . We have implemented a multi-segmentation strategy in all of our markets. These strategies consist of the implementation of different product/price/package portfolios by market cluster or group. These clusters are defined based on consumption occasion, competitive environment and income level, rather than solely on the types of distribution channels.

Client Value Management . We continue transforming our commercial models to focus on our customers’ value potential using a value-based segmentation approach to capture the industry’s potential. We started the rollout of this new model in our Mexico, Central America, Colombia and Brazil operations in 2009. At the end of 2015, we had successfully transformed the commercial models in all of our territories.

We believe that the implementation of these strategies described above also enables us to respond to competitive initiatives with channel-specific responses as opposed to market-wide responses. In addition, it allows us to be more efficient in the way we go to market and invest our marketing resources in those segments that could provide a higher return. Our marketing, segmentation and distribution activities are facilitated by our management information systems, and are all incorporated within our recently created centers of excellence.

 

28


Table of Contents

Centers of Excellence . Our centers of excellence focus on manufacturing, distribution and logistics, commercial, and IT innovation areas. These centers not only enable centralized collaboration and knowledge sharing, but also drive standards of excellence and best practices in our key strategic capabilities.

Manufacturing Center of Excellence . This center focuses on developing industry-leading operating models, practices and processes mainly by reducing operating costs, increasing efficiency and productivity of our manufacturing assets, minimizing waste disposal by optimizing the materials used in our manufacturing processes, and promoting high industrial quality and product safety. We are in the process of developing a Manufacturing Execution System, a new digital platform that will enable us to map and monitor performance at our plants, including critical data from our production equipment and processes.

Distribution and Logistics Center of Excellence . This center seeks to ensure best-in-class customer service by optimizing performance in our supply chain, transport engineering and equipment design, warehouse management and secondary distribution from our warehouses to the point of sale.

Commercial Center of Excellence . This center is designed to develop expertise and promote excellence across key commercial areas. The center establishes and aligns our commercial views across key functional areas; identifies and replicates best commercial practices and processes, develops and enforces commercial performance standards; and drives innovation across our commercial activities.

IT Innovation Center of Excellence . This center is established to support our other centers of excellence by developing a comprehensive technological platform to create and foster innovative processes, technologies and capabilities to centralize information and promote knowledge sharing across our key strategic areas.

Product Sales and Distribution

The following table provides an overview of our distribution centers and the retailers to which we sell our products:

 

     As of December 31, 2015  
     Mexico and Central America (1)      South  America (2)      Venezuela  

Distribution centers

     174         67         33   

Retailers (3)

     966,773         829,703         176,503   

 

(1) Includes Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama.

 

(2) Includes Colombia, Brazil and Argentina.

 

(3) Estimated.

We continuously evaluate our distribution model in order to fit with the local dynamics of the marketplace and analyze the way we go to market, recognizing different service needs from our customers, while looking for a more efficient distribution model. As part of this strategy, we are rolling out a variety of new distribution models throughout our territories looking for improvements in our distribution network.

We use several sales and distribution models depending on market, geographic conditions and the customer’s profile: (i) the pre-sale system, which separates the sales and delivery functions, permitting trucks to be loaded with the mix of products that retailers have previously ordered, thereby increasing both sales and distribution efficiency; (ii) the conventional truck route system, in which the person in charge of the delivery makes immediate sales from inventory available on the truck; (iii) a hybrid distribution system, where the same truck carries product available for immediate sale and product previously ordered through the pre-sale system; (iv) the telemarketing system, which could be combined with pre-sales visits; and (v) sales through third-party wholesalers of our products.

As part of the pre-sale system, sales personnel also provide merchandising services during retailer visits, which we believe enhance the shopper experience at the point of sale. We believe that an adequate number of service visits to retailers and frequency of deliveries are essential elements in an effective selling and distribution system for our products.

Our distribution centers range from large warehousing facilities and re-loading centers to small deposit centers. In addition to our fleet of trucks, we distribute our products in certain locations through electric carts and hand-trucks in order to comply with local environmental and traffic regulations. In some of our territories, we retain third parties to transport our finished products from the bottling plants to the distribution centers.

 

29


Table of Contents

Mexico . We contract a subsidiary of FEMSA for the transportation of finished products to our distribution centers from our production facilities. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions.” From the distribution centers, we then distribute our finished products to retailers through our own fleet of trucks.

In Mexico, we sell a majority of our beverages at small retail stores to consumers who may take the beverages for consumption at home or elsewhere. We also sell products through the “on-premise” consumption segment, supermarkets and other locations. The “on-premise” consumption segment consists of sales through sidewalk stands, restaurants, bars and various types of dispensing machines as well as sales through point-of-sale programs in stadiums, concert halls, auditoriums and theaters.

Brazil.   In Brazil, we sold 33.4% of our total sales volume through modern distribution channels in 2015. Modern distribution channels in Brazil include large and organized chain retail outlets such as wholesale supermarkets, discount stores and convenience stores that sell fast-moving consumer goods, where retailers can buy large volumes of products from various producers. Also in Brazil, we distribute our finished products to retailers through a combination of our own fleet of trucks and third party distributors, while we maintain control over the selling function. In designated zones in Brazil, third-party distributors purchase our products at a discount from the wholesale price and resell the products to retailers.

Territories other than Mexico and Brazil . We distribute our finished products to retailers through a combination of our own fleet of trucks and third party distributors. In most of our territories, an important part of our total sales volume is sold through small retailers, with low supermarket penetration.

Competition

While we believe that our products enjoy wider recognition and greater consumer loyalty than those of our principal competitors, the markets in the territories where we operate are highly competitive. Our principal competitors are local Pepsi bottlers and other bottlers and distributors of local beverage brands. We face increased competition in many of our territories from producers of low price beverages, commonly referred to as “B brands.” A number of our competitors in Central America, Venezuela, Brazil and Argentina offer beer in addition to sparkling beverages, still beverages, and water, which may enable them to achieve distribution efficiencies.

While competitive conditions are different in each of our territories, we compete mainly in terms of price, packaging, effective promotional activities, access to retail outlets and sufficient shelf space, customer service, product innovation and product alternatives and the ability to identify and satisfy consumer preferences. We compete by seeking to offer products at an attractive price in the different segments in our markets and by building on the value of our brands. We believe that the introduction of new products and new presentations has been a significant competitive technique that allows us to increase demand for our products, provide different options to consumers and increase new consumption opportunities. See “—Product and Packaging Mix.”

Mexico and Central America . Our principal competitors in Mexico are bottlers of Pepsi products, whose territories overlap but are not co-extensive with our own. We compete with Organización Cultiba, S.A.B. de C.V., a joint venture formed by Grupo Embotelladoras Unidas, S.A.B. de C.V., the former Pepsi bottler in central and southeast Mexico, a subsidiary of PepsiCo, and Empresas Polar, S.A., the leading beer distributor and Pepsi bottler in Venezuela. Our main competition in the juice category in Mexico is Grupo Jumex. In the water category, Bonafont , a water brand owned by Grupo Danone, is our main competition. In addition, we compete with Cadbury Schweppes in sparkling beverages and with other local brands in our Mexican territories, as well as “B brand” producers, such as Ajemex, S.A. de C.V. and Consorcio AGA, S.A. de C.V., that offer various presentations of sparkling and still beverages.

In the countries that comprise our Central America region, our main competitors are Pepsi and Big Cola bottlers. In Guatemala and Nicaragua, we compete with a joint venture between AmBev and The Central American Bottler Corporation. In Costa Rica, our principal competitor is Florida Bebidas S.A., subsidiary of Florida Ice and Farm Co. In Panama, our main competitor is Cervecería Nacional, S.A. We also face competition from “B brands” offering multiple serving size presentations in some Central American countries.

South America (excluding Venezuela) . Our principal competitor in Colombia is Postobón, a well-established local bottler that sells flavored sparkling beverages (under the brands Postobón and Colombiana ), some of which have a wide consumption preference, such as manzana Postobón (apple Postobón), which is the second most popular flavor in the Colombian sparkling beverage industry in terms of total sales volume. Postobón also sells Pepsi products. Postobón is a vertically integrated producer, the owners of which hold other significant commercial interests in Colombia. We also compete with low-price producers, such as the producers of Big Cola , which principally offer multiple serving size presentations in the sparkling and still beverage industry.

 

30


Table of Contents

In Brazil, we compete against AmBev, a Brazilian company with a portfolio of brands that includes Pepsi , local brands with flavors such as guarana, and proprietary beer brands. We also compete against “B brands” or “Tubainas,” which are small, local producers of low-cost flavored sparkling beverages that represent a significant portion of the sparkling beverage market.

In Argentina, our main competitor is Buenos Aires Embotellador S.A. (BAESA), a Pepsi bottler, which is owned by Argentina’s principal brewery, Quilmes Industrial S.A., and indirectly controlled by AmBev. In addition, we compete with a number of competitors offering generic, low-priced sparkling beverages as well as many other generic products and private label proprietary supermarket brands.

Venezuela . In Venezuela, our main competitor is Pepsi-Cola Venezuela, C.A., a joint venture formed between PepsiCo and Empresas Polar, S.A., the leading beer distributor in the country. We also compete with the producers of Big Cola in part of this country.

Raw Materials

Pursuant to our bottler agreements, we are authorized to manufacture, sell and distribute Coca-Cola trademark beverages within specific geographic areas, and we are required to purchase concentrate for all Coca-Cola trademark beverages in all of our territories from companies designated by The Coca-Cola Company and sweeteners and other raw materials from companies authorized by The Coca-Cola Company. Concentrate prices for Coca-Cola trademark beverages are determined as a percentage of the weighted average retail price in local currency net of applicable taxes. Although The Coca-Cola Company has the right to unilaterally set the price of concentrates, in practice this percentage has historically been set pursuant to periodic negotiations with The Coca-Cola Company.

In the past, The Coca-Cola Company has increased concentrate prices for Coca-Cola trademark beverages in some of the countries where we operate. In 2014, The Coca-Cola Company informed us that it will gradually increase concentrate prices for certain Coca-Cola trademark beverages over a five-year period in Costa Rica and Panama beginning in 2014. In 2015, it informed us that it will gradually increase concentrate prices for flavored water over a four-year period in Mexico beginning in April 2015. Most recently, The Coca-Cola Company also informed us that it will gradually increase concentrate prices for certain Coca-Cola trademark beverages over a two-year period in Colombia beginning in 2016. Based on our estimates, we currently do not expect these increases will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. The Coca-Cola Company may unilaterally increase concentrate prices again in the future and we may not be successful in negotiating or implementing measures to mitigate the negative effect this may have in the prices of our products or our results. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—Cooperation Framework with The Coca-Cola Company.”

In addition to concentrate, we purchase sweeteners, carbon dioxide, resin and preforms to make plastic bottles, finished plastic and glass bottles, cans, caps and fountain containers, as well as other packaging materials and raw materials. Sweeteners are combined with water to produce basic syrup, which is added to the concentrate as the sweetener for most of our beverages. Our bottler agreements provide that, with respect to Coca-Cola trademark beverages, these materials may be purchased only from suppliers approved by The Coca-Cola Company, including certain affiliates of FEMSA. Prices for certain raw materials, including those used in the bottling of our products, mainly resin, preforms to make plastic bottles, finished plastic bottles, aluminum cans, HFCS and certain sweeteners, are paid in or determined with reference to the U.S. dollar, and therefore local prices in a particular country may increase based on changes in the applicable exchange rates. Our most significant packaging raw material costs arise from the purchase of resin and plastic preforms to make plastic bottles and from the purchase of finished plastic bottles, the prices of which are related to crude oil prices and global resin supply. The average prices that we paid for resin and plastic preforms in U.S. dollars in 2015 decreased 24.0% as compared to 2014 in all our territories; however, given that high currency volatility has affected and continues to affect most of our territories, the average prices for resin and plastic preforms in local currencies were higher in 2015 in Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil.

Under our agreements with The Coca-Cola Company, we may use raw or refined sugar or HFCS as sweeteners in our products. Sugar prices in all of the countries where we operate, other than Brazil, are subject to local regulations and other barriers to market entry that cause us to pay for sugar in excess of international market prices for sugar in certain countries. In recent years, international sugar prices experienced significant volatility. Across our territories, our average price for sugar in U.S. dollars decreased approximately 28.0% (12.0% excluding Venezuela) in 2015 as compared to 2014; however, the average price for sugar in local currency was higher in all of our operations, except for Guatemala.

 

31


Table of Contents

We categorize water as a raw material in our business. We obtain water for the production of some of our natural spring water products, such as Manantial in Colombia and Crystal in Brazil, from spring water pursuant to concessions granted.

None of the materials or supplies that we use is presently in short supply, although the supply of specific materials could be adversely affected by strikes, weather conditions, governmental controls, national emergency situations, water shortages or the failure to maintain our existing water concessions.

Mexico and Central America . In Mexico, we purchase our returnable plastic bottles from Graham Packaging México, S.A. de C.V., known as Graham, which is the exclusive supplier of returnable plastic bottles for The Coca-Cola Company and its bottlers in Mexico. We mainly purchase resin from Indorama Ventures Polymers México, S. de R.L. de C.V. (formerly Arteva Specialties, S. de R.L. de C.V.), M&G Polímeros México, S.A. de C.V. and DAK Resinas Americas Mexico, S.A. de C.V., which Alpla México, S.A. de C.V., known as Alpla, and Envases Universales de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V. manufacture into non-returnable plastic bottles for us. Also, we have introduced into our business Asian global suppliers, such as Far Eastern New Century Corp. or FENC, which supports our PET strategy mainly for Central America and is known as one of the top five PET global suppliers.

We purchase all of our cans from Fábricas de Monterrey, S.A. de C.V., or FAMOSA, and Envases Universales de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V., through Promotora Mexicana de Embotelladoras, S.A. de C.V., known as PROMESA, a cooperative of Coca-Cola bottlers, in which, as of April 8, 2016, we held a 35.0% equity interest. We mainly purchase our glass bottles from Vitro America, S. de R.L. de C.V. (formerly Compañía Vidriera, S.A. de C.V., or VITRO), FEVISA Industrial, S.A. de C.V., known as FEVISA, and Glass & Silice, S.A. de C.V., or SIVESA.

We purchase sugar from, among other suppliers, PIASA and Beta San Miguel, S.A. de C.V., both sugar cane producers in which, as of April 8, 2016, we held a 36.3% and 2.7% equity interest, respectively. We purchase HFCS from Ingredion México, S.A. de C.V., Almidones Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V., known as Almex and Cargill de México, S.A. de C.V.

Sugar prices in Mexico are subject to local regulations and other barriers to market entry that cause us to pay higher prices than those paid in the international market. As a result, prices in Mexico have no correlation to international market prices. In 2015, sugar prices in local currency in Mexico increased approximately 9.0% as compared to 2014.

In Central America, the majority of our raw materials such as glass and plastic bottles are purchased from several local suppliers. We purchase all of our cans from PROMESA. Sugar is available from suppliers that represent several local producers. In Costa Rica, we acquire plastic non-returnable bottles from Alpla C.R. S.A., and in Nicaragua we acquire such plastic bottles from Alpla Nicaragua, S.A.

South America (excluding Venezuela) . In Colombia, we use sugar as a sweetener in most of our products, which we buy from several domestic sources. We purchase plastic bottles from Amcor Rigid Plastics de Colombia, S.A. and Tapón Corona de Colombia S.A. (affiliate of Envases Universales de México, S.A.P.I. de C.V.) and have historically purchased all of our glass bottles from Peldar O-I; however, we have engaged new suppliers and have recently acquired glass bottles from Al Tajir and Frigoglass in both cases from the United Arab Emirates. We purchase all of our cans from Crown Colombiana, S.A., which are only available through this local supplier. Grupo Ardila Lulle, owners of our competitor Postobón, own a minority equity interest in Peldar O-I and Crown Colombiana, S.A.

Sugar is available in Brazil at local market prices, which historically have been similar to international prices. Sugar prices in Brazil decreased approximately 12.0% in U.S. dollars and increased 26.0% in local currency as compared to 2014. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Commodity Price Risk.” We purchase glass bottles, plastic bottles and cans from several domestic and international suppliers.

In Argentina, we mainly use HFCS that we purchase from several different local suppliers as a sweetener in our products. We purchase glass bottles, plastic cases and other raw materials from several domestic sources. We purchase plastic preforms, as well as returnable plastic bottles, at competitive prices from Andina Empaques S.A., a local subsidiary of Embotelladora Andina, S.A., a Coca-Cola bottler with operations in Chile, Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay, and other local suppliers. We also acquire plastic preforms from Alpla Avellaneda, S.A. and other suppliers, such as AMCOR Argentina.

Venezuela . In Venezuela, we use sugar as a sweetener in most of our products, which we purchase mainly from the local market. Since 2003, from time to time, we have experienced a sugar shortage due to lower domestic production and the inability of the predominant sugar importers to obtain permission to import in a timely manner. While sugar distribution to the food and beverages industry and to retailers is controlled by the government, we did not experience any material disruptions during 2015 with respect to access to sufficient sugar supply. However, we cannot assure you that we will not experience disruptions in our ability to

 

32


Table of Contents

meet our sugar requirements in the future should the Venezuelan government impose restrictive measures. We buy glass bottles from one local supplier, Productos de Vidrio, C.A., the only supplier authorized by The Coca-Cola Company. We acquire most of our plastic non-returnable bottles from Alpla de Venezuela, S.A. and most of our aluminum cans from a local producer, Dominguez Continental, C.A.

Under current regulations promulgated by the Venezuelan authorities, our ability and that of our suppliers to import some of the raw materials and other supplies used in our production could be limited, and access to the official exchange rate for these items, including, among others, concentrate, resin, aluminum, plastic caps, distribution trucks and vehicles is only achieved by obtaining proper approvals from the relevant authorities.

REGULATION

We are subject to different regulations in each of the territories where we operate. The adoption of new laws or regulations in the countries where we operate may increase our operating costs, our liabilities or impose restrictions on our operations which, in turn, may adversely affect our financial condition, business and results. Further changes in current regulations may result in an increase in compliance costs, which may have an adverse effect on our future results or financial condition.

Price Controls

Voluntary price restraints or statutory price controls have been imposed historically in several of the countries where we operate. Currently, there are no price controls on our products in any of the territories where we have operations, except for those in Argentina, where authorities directly supervise five of our products sold through supermarkets as a measure to control inflation, and Venezuela, where the government has imposed price controls on certain products, including bottled water. In addition, in January 2014, the Venezuelan government passed the Fair Prices Law ( Ley Orgánica de Precios Justos ), which was amended in November 2014 and once again in November 2015, mainly to increase applicable fines and penalties. The purpose of this law is to establish regulations and administrative proceedings to impose a limit on profits earned on the sale of goods, including our products, seeking to maintain price stability of, and equal access to, goods and services. A ruling derived from this law imposes an obligation to manufacturing companies to label products with the fair or maximum sales’ price for each product. This law also creates the National Office of Costs and Prices which main role is to oversee price controls and set maximum retail prices on certain consumer goods and services. We cannot assure you that we will be in compliance at all times with these laws based on changes, market dynamics in these two countries and the lack of clarity of certain basic aspects of the applicable law in Venezuela. Any such changes and potential violations may have an adverse impact on our business. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Regulatory developments may adversely affect our business.”

Taxation of Sparkling Beverages

All the countries where we operate, except for Panama, impose a value-added tax on the sale of sparkling beverages, with a rate of 16.0% in Mexico, 12.0% in Guatemala, 15.0% in Nicaragua, an average percentage of 15.8% in Costa Rica, 16.0% in Colombia (applied only to the first sale in the supply chain), 12.0% in Venezuela, 21.0% in Argentina, and in Brazil 17.0% in the states of Mato Grosso do Sul and Goias and 18.0% in the states of Sao Paulo, Minas Gerais, Parana and Rio de Janeiro. The state of Rio de Janeiro also charges an additional 1.0% as a contribution to a poverty eradication fund. In Brazil the value-added tax is grossed-up and added, along with federal sales tax, at the taxable basis. In addition, we are responsible for charging and collecting the value-added tax from each of our retailers in Brazil, based on average retail prices for each state where we operate, defined primarily through a survey conducted by the government of each state, which in 2015 represented an average taxation of approximately 9.7% over net sales. In addition, several of the countries where we operate impose the following excise or other taxes:

 

   

Mexico imposes an excise tax of Ps.1.00 per liter on the production, sale and importation of beverages with added sugar and HFCS as of January 1, 2014. This tax is applied only to the first sale and we are responsible for charging and collecting this excise tax.

 

   

Guatemala imposes an excise tax of 0.18 cents in local currency (Ps.0.41 as of December 31, 2015) per liter of sparkling beverage.

 

   

Costa Rica imposes a specific tax on non-alcoholic bottled beverages based on the combination of packaging and flavor, currently assessed at 18.11 colones (Ps.0.57 as of December 31, 2015) per 250 ml, and an excise tax currently assessed at 6.313 colones (approximately Ps.0.20 as of December 31, 2015) per 250 ml.

 

   

Nicaragua imposes a 9.0% tax on consumption, and municipalities impose a 1.0% tax on our Nicaraguan gross income.

 

   

Panama imposes a 5.0% tax based on the cost of goods produced and a 10.0% selective consumption tax on syrups, powders and concentrate.

 

33


Table of Contents
   

Argentina imposes an excise tax of 8.7% on sparkling beverages containing less than 5.0% lemon juice or less than 10.0% fruit juice, and an excise tax of 4.2% on sparkling water and flavored sparkling beverages with 10.0% or more fruit juice, although this excise tax is not applicable to some of our products.

 

   

Brazil assesses an average production tax of approximately 4.2% and an average sales tax of approximately 10.2% over net sales. Until April 30, 2015, these taxes were fixed by the federal government based on national average retail prices obtained through surveys. The national average retail price of each product and presentation was multiplied by a fixed rate combined with specific multipliers for each presentation, to obtain a fixed tax per liter, per product and presentation. These taxes were applied only to the first sale and we were responsible for charging and collecting these taxes from each of our retailers. Beginning on May 1, 2015, these federal taxes were applied based on the price sold, as detailed in our invoices, instead of an average retail price combined with a fixed tax rate and multiplier per presentation. Except for sales to wholesalers, this production and sales taxes apply only to the first sale and we are responsible for charging and collecting these taxes from each of our retailers. For sales to wholesalers, they are entitled to recover the sales tax and charge this tax again upon the resale of our products to retailers.

 

   

Colombia’s municipalities impose a sales tax that varies between 0.35% and 1.2% of net sales.

 

   

Venezuela’s municipalities impose a variable excise tax applied only to the first sale that varies between 0.6% and 2.5% of net sales.

Recent Tax Reforms

On January 1, 2014, a general tax reform became effective in Mexico. This reform included the imposition of a new special tax on the production, sale and importation of beverages with added sugar and HFCS, at the rate of Ps.1.00 per liter. In addition, the tax reform in Mexico, as applicable to us, confirmed the income tax rate of 30.0%, eliminated the corporate flat tax (IETU), imposed a withholding tax at a rate of 10.0% on the payment of dividends, an income tax rate of 10.0% on capital gains from the sale of shares traded in the stock exchange by individuals that are Mexican residents and a withholding tax at a rate of 10.0% on capital gains from the sale of shares traded in the stock exchange by individuals and companies that are non-Mexican residents, limited the total compensation of income tax paid or retained on dividends paid outside of Mexico and limited the total amount that can be deducted for income tax purposes from exempt payments to employees.

On January 1, 2015, a general tax reform became effective in Colombia. This reform included the imposition of a new temporary tax on net equity through 2017 to Colombian residents and non-residents who own property in Colombia directly or indirectly through branches or permanent establishments. The relevant taxable base will be determined annually based on a formula. For net equity that exceeds 5.0 billion Colombian pesos (approximately US$2.1 million) the rate will be 1.15% in 2015, 1.00% in 2016 and 0.40% in 2017. In addition, the tax reform in Colombia imposed that the supplementary income tax at a rate of 9.0% as contributions to social programs, which was previously scheduled to decrease to 8.0% by 2015, will remain indefinitely. Additionally, this tax reform included the imposition of a temporary contribution to social programs at a rate of 5.0%, 6.0%, 8.0% and 9.0% for the years 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively. Finally, this reform establishes an income tax deduction of 2.0% of value-added tax paid in the acquisition or import of hard assets, such as tangible and amortizable assets that are not sold or transferred in the ordinary course of business and that are used for the production of goods or services.

In Guatemala, the income tax rate for 2014 was 28.0% and it decreased for 2015 to 25.0%, as scheduled.

On November 18, 2014, a tax reform became effective in Venezuela. This reform included changes on how the carrying value of operating losses is reported. The reform established that operating losses carried forward year over year (but limited to three fiscal years) may not exceed 25.0% of the taxable income in the relevant period. The reform also eliminated the possibility to carry over losses relating to inflationary adjustments and included changes that grant Venezuelan tax authorities broader powers and authority in connection with their ability to enact administrative rulings related to income tax withholding and to collect taxes and increase fines and penalties for tax-related violations, including the ability to confiscate assets without a court order.

On December 30, 2015, the Venezuelan government enacted a package of tax reforms that became effective in January 2016. This reform mainly (i) eliminated the inflationary adjustments for the calculation of income tax as well as the new investment tax deduction, and (ii) imposed a new tax on financial transactions effective as of February 1, 2016, for those identified as “special taxpayers,” at a rate of 0.75% over certain financial transactions, such as bank withdrawals, transfer of bonds and securities, payment of debts without intervention of the financial system and debits on bank accounts for cross-border payments, which will be immediately withheld by the banks.

 

34


Table of Contents

On April 1, 2015, the Brazilian government issued Decree No. 8.426/15 to impose, as of July 2015, PIS/COFINS (Social Contributions on Gross Revenues) of 4.65% on financial income (except for foreign exchange variations).

Starting in 2016, the Brazilian rates of value-added tax in certain states will change as follows: Mato Grosso do Sul from 17.0% to 20.0%; Minas Gerais, 18.0% and an additional 2.0% will be charged on sales to non-taxpayers, as a contribution to a poverty eradication fund; Rio de Janeiro, the contribution to poverty eradication will increase from 1.0% to 2.0% as of April 2016; and Parana, 16.0% and an additional 2.0% will be charged on sales to non-taxpayers, as a contribution to a poverty eradication fund. In addition and specifically for sales of beer, the value-added tax rate will increase to a maximum of 25.0%.

In addition, as of January 1, 2016, the Brazilian federal production tax rates will be reduced and the rates of the federal sales tax will increase. We expect the average of these taxes will range between 14.4% and 15.5% over the net sales.

Water Supply

In Mexico, we obtain water directly from municipal utility companies and pump water from wells pursuant to concessions obtained from the Mexican government on a plant-by-plant basis. Water use in Mexico is regulated primarily by the 1992 Water Law ( Ley de Aguas Nacionales de 1992 ), as amended, and regulations issued thereunder, which created the National Water Commission ( Comisión Nacional del Agua ). The National Water Commission is in charge of overseeing the national system of water use. Under the 1992 Water Law, concessions for the use of a specific volume of ground or surface water generally run from five to fifty-year terms, depending on the supply of groundwater in each region as projected by the National Water Commission. Concessionaires may request concession terms be extended before the expiration of the same. The Mexican government is authorized to reduce the volume of ground or surface water granted for use by a concession by whatever volume of water that is not used by the concessionaire for two consecutive years. However, because the current concessions for each of our plants in Mexico do not match each plant’s projected needs for water in future years, we have successfully negotiated with the Mexican government the right to transfer the unused volume under concessions from certain plants to other plants anticipating greater water usage in the future. Our concessions may be terminated if, among other things, we use more water than permitted or we fail to pay required concession-related fees and do not cure such situations in a timely manner. Although we have not undertaken independent studies to confirm the sufficiency of the existing groundwater supply, we believe that our existing concessions satisfy our current water requirements in Mexico.

In addition, the 1992 Water Law provides that plants located in Mexico that use deep water wells to supply their water requirements must pay a fee to the local governments for the discharge of residual waste water to drainage. Pursuant to this law, certain local authorities test the quality of the waste water discharge and charge plants an additional fee for measurements that exceed certain standards published by the National Water Commission. In the case of non-compliance with the law, penalties, including closures, may be imposed. All of our bottling plants located in Mexico meet these standards. In addition, our plants in Apizaco and San Cristobal are certified with ISO 14001. See “—Description of Property, Plant and Equipment.”

In Brazil, we obtain water and mineral water from wells pursuant to concessions granted by the Brazilian government for each plant. According to the Brazilian Constitution, water is considered an asset of common use and can only be exploited for the national interest by Brazilians or companies formed under Brazilian law. Concessionaires and users have the responsibility for any damage to the environment. The exploitation and use of water is regulated by the Code of Mining, Decree Law No. 227/67 ( Código de Mineração ), the Mineral Water Code, Decree Law No. 7841/45 ( Código de Águas Minerais ), the National Water Resources Policy (Law No. 9433/97) and by regulations issued thereunder. The companies that exploit water are supervised by the National Department of Mineral Production ( Departamento Nacional de Produção Mineiral —DNPM) and the National Water Agency ( Agência Nacional de Águas ) in connection with federal health agencies, as well as state and municipal authorities. In the Jundiai, Marilia, Curitiba, Maringa, Porto Real and Itabirito plants, we do not exploit spring water. In the Mogi das Cruzes, Bauru and Campo Grande plants, we have all the necessary permits for the exploitation of spring water.

In Argentina, a state water company provides water to our Alcorta plant on a limited basis; however, we believe the authorized amount meets our requirements for this plant. In our Monte Grande plant in Argentina, we pump water from wells, in accordance with Law No. 25.688.

In Colombia, in addition to natural spring water for Manantial , we obtain water directly from wells and from utility companies. We are required to have a specific concession to exploit water from natural sources. Water use in Colombia is regulated by Law No. 9 of 1979 and Decrees No. 2811 of 1974 and No. 3930 of 2010. In addition, Decree No. 303 requires us to apply for water concessions and for authorization to discharge our water into public waterways. The Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development and Regional Autonomous Corporations supervises companies that use water as a raw material for their businesses.

 

35


Table of Contents

In Nicaragua, the use of water is regulated by the National Water Law ( Ley General de Aguas Nacionales ), and we obtain water directly from wells. In Costa Rica, the use of water is regulated by the Water Law ( Ley de Aguas ). In both of these countries, we exploit water from wells granted to us through governmental concessions. In Guatemala, no license or permits are required to exploit water from the private wells in our own plants. In Panama, we acquire water from a state water company, and the use of water is regulated by the Panama Use of Water Regulation ( Reglamento de Uso de Aguas de Panamá ).

In Venezuela, we use private wells in addition to water provided by the municipalities, and we have taken the appropriate actions, including actions to comply with water regulations, to have water supply available from these sources, regulated by the Water Law ( Ley de Aguas ).

In addition, we obtain water for the production of some of our natural spring water products, such as Manantial in Colombia and Crystal in Brazil, from spring water pursuant to concessions granted. See “—Regulation—Water Supply.”

We cannot assure that water will be available in sufficient quantities to meet our future production needs, that we will be able to maintain our current concessions or that additional regulations relating to water use will not be adopted in the future in our territories. We believe we are in material compliance with the terms of our existing water concessions and that we are in compliance with all relevant water regulations currently in place. See “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Water shortages or any failure to maintain existing concessions could adversely affect our business.”

Environmental Matters

In all of our territories, our operations are subject to federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. In Mexico, the principal legislation is the Federal General Law for Ecological Equilibrium and Environmental Protection ( Ley General de Equilibrio Ecológico y Protección al Ambiente , or the Mexican Environmental Law), and the General Law for the Prevention and Integral Management of Waste ( Ley General para la Prevención y Gestión Integral de los Residuos ) which are enforced by the Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources ( Secretaría del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, or SEMARNAT). SEMARNAT can bring administrative and criminal proceedings against companies that violate environmental laws, and it also has the power to close non-complying facilities. Under the Mexican Environmental Law, rules have been promulgated concerning water, air and noise pollution and hazardous substances. In particular, Mexican environmental laws and regulations require that we file periodic reports with respect to hazardous wastes and set forth standards for waste water discharge that apply to our operations. We are also subject to certain minor restrictions on the operation of delivery trucks in Mexico City. We have implemented several programs designed to facilitate compliance with air, waste, noise and energy standards established by current Mexican federal and state environmental laws, including a program that installs catalytic converters and liquid petroleum gas in delivery trucks for our operations in Mexico City. See “—The Company—Product Sales and Distribution.”

In March 2015, the General Law of Climate Change ( Ley General de Cambio Climático ), its regulation and certain decrees related to such law became effective, imposing upon different industries (including the food and beverage industry) the obligation to report direct or indirect gas emissions exceeding 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide. Currently, we are not required to report these emissions, since we do not exceed this threshold. We cannot assure you that we will not be required to comply with this reporting requirement in the future.

In our Mexican operations, we established a partnership with The Coca-Cola Company and Alpla, our supplier of plastic bottles in Mexico, to create Industria Mexicana de Reciclaje (IMER), a PET recycling facility located in Toluca, Mexico. This facility began operations in 2005 and has a recycling capacity of approximately 25,000 metric tons per year from which 15,000 metric tons can be re-used in PET bottles for food packaging purposes. We have also continued contributing funds to ECOCE, A.C., a nationwide collector of containers and packaging materials. In addition, our plants located in Toluca, Reyes, Cuautitlan, Apizaco, San Cristobal, Morelia, Ixtacomitan, Coatepec, Poza Rica, Pacifico, Ojuelos and Cuernavaca have received or are in the process of receiving a Certificate of Clean Industry ( Certificado de Industria Limpia ). In addition, seven of our distribution centers located in the State of Mexico, Mexico have received or are in the process of receiving a Certificate of Clean Industry.

As part of our environmental protection and sustainability strategies, in December 2009, we, jointly with strategic partners, entered into a wind energy supply agreement with a Mexican subsidiary of the Spanish wind farm developer, GAMESA Energía, S.A., or GAMESA, to supply green energy to our bottling facility in Toluca, Mexico, owned by our subsidiary, Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V., or Propimex, and to some of our suppliers of PET bottles. In 2010, GAMESA sold its interest in its Mexican subsidiary that owned the wind farm, to Iberdrola Renovables México, S.A. de C.V. The wind farm, which is located in La Ventosa, Oaxaca, generates approximately 100,000 megawatt hours annually. In 2013, 2014 and 2015, this wind farm provided us with approximately 81,000, 90,000 and 64,500 megawatt hours, respectively.

 

36


Table of Contents

Additionally, we have entered into 20-year wind power supply agreements with two suppliers to receive clean energy for use at our production and distribution facilities throughout Mexico: (a) Energía Eólica del Sur, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (formerly known as Mareña Renovables Wind Power Farm) with a 396,000 megawatt installed capacity wind farm in Oaxaca, Mexico, which is expected to begin operations in 2017; and (b) Enel Green Power with a 100,000 megawatt installed capacity wind farm in San Luis Potosi, Mexico, which provided a total of 6,863 megawatt hours for use at 50 of our production and distribution facilities. In 2015, five of our manufacturing facilities received a total of 19,100 megawatt hours from renewable energy sources such as biomass and bagasse cogeneration from the PIASA “Tres Valles” sugar mill. Currently, 56 of our Mexican facilities receive energy from renewable energy sources, which represent 50.0% of our current energy consumption in Mexico.

Our Central American operations are subject to several federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, which have been enacted in the last ten years, as awareness has increased in this region about the protection of the environment and the disposal of hazardous and toxic materials, as well as water usage. Our Costa Rican operations have participated in a joint effort along with the local division of The Coca-Cola Company, Misión Planeta, for the collection and recycling of non-returnable plastic bottles.

Our Colombian operations are subject to several Colombian federal and state laws and regulations related to the protection of the environment and the disposal of treated water and toxic and hazardous materials. These laws include the control of atmospheric emissions, noise emissions, disposal of treated water and strict limitations on the use of chlorofluorocarbons. In addition, on February 6, 2012, Colombia promulgated Decree No. 303, which requires us to apply for an authorization to discharge our water into public waterways. We are engaged in nationwide reforestation programs and campaigns for the collection and recycling of glass and plastic bottles, among other programs with positive environmental impacts. We have also obtained and maintained the ISO 9001, ISO 14001, OHSAS 18001, FSSC 22000 and PAS 220 certifications for our plants located in Medellin, Cali, Bogota, Barranquilla, Bucaramanga and La Calera, as recognition for the highest quality and food harmlessness in our production processes, which is evidence of our strict level of compliance with relevant Colombian regulations. Our six plants joined a small group of companies that have obtained these certifications. We expect our new plant located in Tocancipa, that commenced operations in February 2015, will obtain the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification in 2017.

Our Venezuelan operations are subject to several Venezuelan federal, state and municipal laws and regulations related to the protection of the environment. The most relevant of these laws are the Organic Environmental Law ( Ley Orgánica del Ambiente ), the Substance, Material and Dangerous Waste Law ( Ley Sobre Sustancias, Materiales y Desechos Peligrosos ), the Criminal Environmental Law ( Ley Penal del Ambiente ) and the Water Law ( Ley de Aguas ). Since the enactment of the Organic Environmental Law in 1995, our Venezuelan subsidiary has presented the corresponding authorities with plans to bring our production facilities and distribution centers into compliance with applicable laws, which mainly consist of building or expanding the capacity of water treatment plants in our bottling facilities. We currently have water treatment plants in our bottling facilities located in the cities of Barcelona, Valencia and in our Antimano bottling plant in Caracas, and we are still under construction and expansion of our current water treatment plant in our bottling facility in Maracaibo.

Our Brazilian operations are subject to several federal, state and municipal laws and regulations related to the protection of the environment. Among the most relevant laws and regulations are those dealing with the emission of toxic and hazardous gases and disposal of wastewater and solid waste, soil contamination by hazardous chemicals, which impose penalties, such as fines, facility closures or criminal charges depending upon the level of non-compliance.

Our production plant located in Jundiai has been recognized by the Brazilian authorities for its compliance with environmental regulations and for having standards well above those imposed by the law. The plant of Jundiai has been certified for GAO-Q and GAO-E. In addition, the plants of Jundiai, Mogi das Cruzes, Campo Grande, Marilia, Maringa, Curitiba and Bauru have been certified for (i) ISO 9001: 2008; (ii) ISO 14001: 2004 and; (iii) norm OHSAS 18001: 2007. In 2012, the Jundiai, Campo Grande, Bauru, Marilia, Curitiba, Maringa, Porto Real and Mogi das Cruzes plants were certified in standard FSSC22000.

In May 2008, a municipal regulation of the City of Sao Paulo, implemented pursuant to Law 13.316/2002, came into effect requiring us to collect for recycling a specified annual percentage of plastic bottles made from PET sold in the City of Sao Paulo. Beginning in May 2011, we were required to collect for recycling 90.0% of PET bottles sold. Currently, we are not able to collect the entire required volume of PET bottles we sell in the City of Sao Paulo for recycling. Since we do not meet the requirements of this regulation, which we believe to be more onerous than those imposed by the countries with the highest recycling standards, we could be fined and be subject to other sanctions, such as the suspension of operations in any of our plants and/or distribution centers located in the City of Sao Paulo. In May 2008, when the law came into effect, we and other bottlers in the City of Sao Paulo, through the Brazilian Soft Drink and Non-Alcoholic Beverage Association, or ABIR ( Associação Brasileira das Indústrias de Refrigerantes e de Bebidas Não-alcoólicas ), filed a motion requesting a court to overturn this regulation due to the impossibility of compliance.

 

37


Table of Contents

In addition, in November 2009, in response to a municipal authority request for us to demonstrate the destination of the PET bottles sold in Sao Paulo, we filed a motion presenting all of our recycling programs and requesting a more practical timeline to comply with the requirements of the law. In October 2010, the municipal authority of Sao Paulo levied a fine on our Brazilian operating subsidiary of 250,000 Brazilian reais (approximately Ps.1.1 million as of December 31, 2015) on the grounds that the report submitted by our Brazilian operating subsidiary did not comply with the 75.0% proper disposal requirement for the period from May 2008 to May 2010. We filed an appeal against this fine, which was denied by the municipal authority in May 2013. This resolution is final and non-appealable and, therefore, the administrative stage is closed. In July 2012, the State Appellate Court of Sao Paulo rendered a decision admitting an interlocutory appeal filed on behalf of ABIR suspending the fines and other sanctions to ABIR’s associated companies, including our Brazilian subsidiary, for alleged noncompliance with the recycling municipal regulation up to the final resolution of the lawsuit. We are still awaiting final resolution of the lawsuit filed on behalf of ABIR. We cannot assure you that these measures will have the desired effect or that we will prevail in our judicial challenge.

In August 2010, Law No. 12.305/2010 established the Brazilian National Solid Waste Policy. This policy is based on the principle of shared responsibility between the government, companies and the public, and provides for the post-consumption return of products to companies and requires public authorities to implement waste management programs. This law is regulated by Federal Decree No. 7.404/2010, and was published in December 2010. In response to the Brazilian National Solid Waste Policy, in December 2012, a proposal of agreement was provided to the Ministry of the Environment by almost 30 associations involved in the packaging sector, including ABIR in its capacity as representative for The Coca-Cola Company, our Brazilian subsidiary and other bottlers. This agreement proposed the creation of a “coalition” to implement systems for reverse logistics packaging non-dangerous waste that make up the dry fraction of municipal solid waste or equivalent. The goal of the proposal is to create methodologies for sustainable development, and improve the management of solid waste by increasing recycling rates and decreasing incorrect disposal in order to protect the environment, society and the economy. The Ministry of Environment approved and signed this agreement in November 2015.

Our Argentine operations are subject to federal and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. The most significant of these are regulations concerning waste water discharge, which are enforced by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Sustainable Development ( Secretaría de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sustentable ) and the Provincial Organization for Sustainable Development ( Organismo Provincial para el Desarrollo Sostenible ) for the province of Buenos Aires. Our Alcorta plant is in compliance with environmental standards and we have been, and continue to be, certified for ISO 14001:2004 for the plants and operative units in Buenos Aires.

For all of our plant operations, we employ the following environmental management system Environmental Administration System, or EKOSYSTEM ( Sistema de Administración Ambiental ) that is contained within the Integral Quality System or SICKOF ( Sistema Integral de Calidad ).

We have spent, and may be required to spend in the future, funds for compliance with and remediation under local environmental laws and regulations. Currently, we do not believe that such costs will have a material adverse effect on our results or financial condition. However, since environmental laws and regulations and their enforcement are becoming increasingly stringent in our territories, and there is increased recognition by local authorities of the need for higher environmental standards in the countries where we operate, changes in current regulations may result in an increase in costs, which may have an adverse effect on our future results or financial condition. We are not aware of any significant pending regulatory changes that would require a significant amount of additional remedial capital expenditures.

We do not believe that our business activities pose a material risk to the environment, and we believe that we are in material compliance with all applicable environmental laws and regulations.

Other Regulations

In December 2009, the Venezuelan government issued a decree requiring a reduction in energy consumption by at least 20.0% for industrial companies whose consumption is greater than two megawatts per hour and to submit an energy-usage reduction plan. Since some of our bottling operations in Venezuela outside of Caracas met this threshold, we submitted a plan, which included the purchase of generators for our plants. We have installed electrical generators in our Antimano, Barcelona, Maracaibo and Valencia bottling facilities to mitigate any such risks and filed the respective energy-usage reduction plans with the authorities. In addition, since January 2010, the Venezuelan government has implemented and continues to implement power cuts and other measures for all industries in Caracas whose consumption is above 35 kilowatts per hour.

In May 2014, the Mexican government approved a decree that established mandatory guidelines applicable to the entire national education system (from elementary school through college). According to the decree, the sale of specific sparkling beverages and still beverages that contain sugar or HFCS by schools is prohibited. Schools are still allowed to sell water and certain still beverages, such

 

38


Table of Contents

as juices and juice-based beverages that comply with the guidelines established in such decree. We cannot assure you that the Mexican government will not further restrict sales of other of our products by such schools. These restrictions and any further restrictions could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

In January 2012, the Costa Rican government approved a decree which regulates the sale of food and beverages in public schools. According to the decree, the sale of all sparkling beverages and certain still beverages that contain sugar, syrup or HFCS in any type of presentation in schools is prohibited. We are still allowed to sell water and certain still beverages in schools. Although we are in compliance with this law, we cannot assure you that the Costa Rican government will not further restrict sales of other of our products in schools in the future; these restrictions and any further restrictions could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.

In May 2012, the Venezuelan government adopted significant changes to labor regulations that had a negative impact on our business and operations. The principal changes that impacted our operations were and still are: (i) the requirement that employee terminations are now subject to governmental authorization; (ii) retroactive assessments for any modifications to our severance payment system; (iii) a reduction in the maximum daily and weekly working hours (from 44 to 40 weekly); (iv) an increase in mandatory weekly breaks, prohibiting a reduction in salaries as a result of such increase; and (v) the requirement that all third party contractors participating in the manufacturing and sales processes of our products be included in our payroll. We are currently in compliance with these labor regulations.

In September 2012, the Brazilian government issued Law No. 12,619 (Law of Professional Drivers), which regulates the working hours of professional drivers who distribute our products from our plants to the distribution centers and to retailers and points of sale. Pursuant to this law, employers must keep a record of working hours, including overtime hours, of professional drivers in a reliable manner, such as electronic logbooks or worksheets. We are currently in compliance with this law.

In June 2013, following a comprehensive amendment to the Mexican Constitution, a new antitrust authority with autonomy was created: the Federal Antitrust Commission ( Comisión Federal de Competencia Económica , or COFECE). As a result of these amendments, new antitrust and telecommunications specialized courts were created and commenced hearing cases in August 2013. In July 2014, a new federal antitrust law came into effect based on the amended constitutional provisions. As part of these amendments, two new relative monopolistic practices were included: reductions in margins between prices to access essential raw materials and end-user prices of such raw materials and limitation or restriction on access to essential raw materials or supplies. Furthermore, the ability to close a merger or acquisition without antitrust clearance from the COFECE was eliminated. The regular waiting period for authorization has been extended to 60 business days. We cannot assure you that these new amendments and the creation of new governmental bodies and courts will not have an adverse effect on our business or our inorganic growth plans.

In November 2014, the Venezuelan government amended the Foreign Investment Law. As part of the amendments made, the law now provides that at least 75.0% of the value of foreign investment must be comprised of assets located in Venezuela, which may include equipment, supplies or other goods or tangible assets required at the early stages of operations. By the end of the first fiscal year after commencement of operations in Venezuela, investors will be authorized to repatriate up to 80.0% of the profits derived from their investment. Any profits not otherwise repatriated in a fiscal year, may be accumulated and be repatriated the following fiscal year, together with profits generated during such year. In the event of liquidation, a company may repatriate up to 85.0% of the value of the foreign investment. Currently, the scope of this law is not entirely clear with respect to the liquidation process.

In June 2014, the Brazilian government issued Law No. 12,997 (Law of Motorcycle Drivers), which imposes a risk premium of 30.0% of the base salary payable to all employees who drive motorcycles in their job. This risk premium became enforceable in October 2014, when the related rules and regulations were issued by the Ministry of Labor and Employment. We believe that these rules and regulations (Decree No. 1.565/2014) were unduly issued by such Ministry since it did not comply with all the essential requirements established in Decree No. 1.127/2003. In November 2014, we, in conjunction with other bottlers of the Coca-Cola system in Brazil and through the ABIR, filed an action against the Ministry of Labor and Employment to suspend the effects of such decree. ABIR’s associated companies, including our Brazilian subsidiary, were issued a preliminary injunction suspending the effects of the decree and exempting us from paying the risk premium. The Ministry of Labor and Employment filed an interlocutory appeal against the preliminary injunction in order to restore the effects of Decree No. 1.565/2014, which was denied. We are currently awaiting final resolution of the lawsuit filed on behalf of ABIR. In the meantime, in December 2015, the Ministry of Labor and Employment started a new discussion with the participation of all interested parties seeking to reissue Decree No. 1.565/2014, in order to comply with the essential requirements.

 

39


Table of Contents

In January 2014, a new Anti-Corruption Law in Brazil came into effect, which regulates bribery, corruption practices and fraud in connection with agreements entered into with governmental agencies. The main purpose of this law is to impose liability on companies carrying out such practices, establishing fines that can reach up to 20.0% of a company’s gross revenues in the previous fiscal year. Although we believe we are in compliance with this law, if we were found liable for any of these practices, this law may have an adverse effect on our business.

In December 2015, the Venezuelan Ministry of Health issued a resolution which imposes an obligation to label certain products, including sparkling beverages and still beverages that contain sugar with health warnings. Recently, the Venezuelan Ministry of Health granted a nine-month extension for the enforcement of this resolution. We, together with other companies of the industry and the corresponding authorities, are currently discussing a new resolution with a different scope, which would amend or supersede the resolution issued in December 2015.

BOTTLER AGREEMENTS

Coca-Cola Bottler Agreements

Bottler agreements are the standard agreements for each territory that The Coca-Cola Company enters into with bottlers. Pursuant to our bottler agreements, we are authorized to manufacture, sell and distribute Coca-Cola trademark beverages within specific geographic areas, and we are required to purchase concentrate for all Coca-Cola trademark beverages in all of our territories from companies designated by The Coca-Cola Company and sweeteners and other raw materials from companies authorized by The Coca-Cola Company.

These bottler agreements also provide that we will purchase our entire requirement of concentrate for Coca-Cola trademark beverages at prices, terms of payment and on other terms and conditions of supply as determined from time to time by The Coca-Cola Company at its sole discretion. Concentrate prices for Coca-Cola trademark beverages are determined as a percentage of the weighted average retail price in local currency, net of applicable taxes. Although the price multipliers used to calculate the cost of concentrate and the currency of payment, among other terms, are set by The Coca-Cola Company at its sole discretion, we set the price of products sold to customers at our discretion, subject to the applicability of price restraints imposed by authorities in certain territories. We have the exclusive right to distribute Coca-Cola trademark beverages for sale in our territories in authorized containers of the nature approved by the bottler agreements and currently used by our company. These containers include various configurations of cans and returnable and non-returnable bottles made of glass, aluminum and plastic and fountain containers.

The bottler agreements include an acknowledgment by us that The Coca-Cola Company is the sole owner of the trademarks that identify the Coca-Cola trademark beverages and of the secret formulas with which The Coca-Cola Company’s concentrates are made. Subject to our exclusive right to distribute Coca-Cola trademark beverages in our territories, The Coca-Cola Company reserves the right to import and export Coca-Cola trademark beverages to and from each of our territories. Our bottler agreements do not contain restrictions on The Coca-Cola Company’s ability to set the price of concentrates and do not impose minimum marketing obligations on The Coca-Cola Company. The prices at which we purchase concentrate under the bottler agreements may vary materially from the prices we have historically paid. However, under our bylaws and the shareholders agreement among The Coca-Cola Company and certain of its subsidiaries and FEMSA, an adverse action by The Coca-Cola Company under any of the bottler agreements may result in a suspension of certain voting rights of the directors appointed by The Coca-Cola Company. This provides us with limited protection against The Coca-Cola Company’s ability to raise concentrate prices to the extent that such increase is deemed detrimental to us pursuant to such shareholder agreement and our bylaws. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—The Shareholders Agreement.”

The Coca-Cola Company has the ability, at its sole discretion, to reformulate any of the Coca-Cola trademark beverages and to discontinue any of the Coca-Cola trademark beverages, subject to certain limitations, so long as all Coca-Cola trademark beverages are not discontinued. The Coca-Cola Company may also introduce new beverages in our territories in which case we have a right of first refusal with respect to the manufacturing, packaging, distribution and sale of such new beverages subject to the same obligations as then exist with respect to the Coca-Cola trademark beverages under the bottler agreements. The bottler agreements prohibit us from producing, bottling or handling beverages other than Coca-Cola trademark beverages, or other products or packages that would imitate, infringe upon, or cause confusion with the products, trade dress, containers or trademarks of The Coca-Cola Company, except under the authority of, or with the consent of, The Coca-Cola Company. The bottler agreements also prohibit us from acquiring or holding an interest in a party that engages in such restricted activities. The bottler agreements impose restrictions concerning the use of certain trademarks, authorized containers, packaging and labeling of The Coca-Cola Company so as to conform to policies approved by The Coca-Cola Company. In particular, we are obligated to:

 

   

maintain plant and equipment, staff and distribution facilities capable of manufacturing, packaging and distributing the Coca-Cola trademark beverages in authorized containers in accordance with our bottler agreements and in sufficient quantities to satisfy fully the demand in our territories;

 

40


Table of Contents
   

undertake adequate quality control measures established by The Coca-Cola Company;

 

   

develop, stimulate and satisfy fully the demand for Coca-Cola trademark beverages using all approved means, which includes the investment in advertising and marketing plans;

 

   

maintain a sound financial capacity as may be reasonably necessary to assure performance by us and our subsidiaries of our obligations to The Coca-Cola Company; and

 

   

submit annually to The Coca-Cola Company our marketing, management, promotional and advertising plans for the ensuing year.

The Coca-Cola Company contributed a significant portion of our total marketing expenses in our territories during 2015 and has reiterated its intention to continue providing such support as part of our cooperation framework. Although we believe that The Coca-Cola Company will continue to provide funds for advertising and marketing, it is not obligated to do so. Consequently, future levels of advertising and marketing support provided by The Coca-Cola Company may vary materially from the levels historically provided. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—The Shareholders Agreement” and “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—Cooperation Framework with The Coca-Cola Company.”

We have separate bottler agreements with The Coca-Cola Company for each of the territories where we operate, on substantially the same terms and conditions. These bottler agreements are automatically renewable for ten-year terms, subject to the right of either party to give prior notice that it does not wish to renew a specific agreement.

As of December 31, 2015, we had:

 

   

nine bottler agreements in Mexico: (i) two agreements for the Valley of Mexico territory, which are up for renewal in May 2016 and June 2023, (ii) the agreement for the southeast territory, which is up for renewal in June 2023, (iii) three agreements for the central territory, which are up for renewal in May 2016, July 2016 and May 2025, (iv) the agreement for the northeast territory, which is up for renewal in May 2016, and (v) two agreements for the Bajio territory, which are up for renewal in May 2016 and May 2025;

 

   

four bottler agreements in Brazil, which are up for renewal in October 2017 (two agreements) and April 2024 (two agreements); and

 

   

one bottler agreement in each of Argentina, which is up for renewal in September 2024, Colombia, which is up for renewal in June 2024; Venezuela, which is up for renewal in August 2016; Guatemala, which is up for renewal in March 2025; Costa Rica, which is up for renewal in September 2017; Nicaragua, which is up for renewal in May 2016 and Panama, which is up for renewal in November 2024.

The bottler agreements are subject to termination by The Coca-Cola Company in the event of default by us. The default provisions include limitations on the change in ownership or control of our company and the assignment or transfer of the bottler agreements and are designed to preclude any person not acceptable to The Coca-Cola Company from obtaining an assignment of a bottler agreement or from acquiring our company independently of other rights set forth in the shareholders’ agreement. These provisions may prevent changes in our principal shareholders, including mergers or acquisitions involving sales or dispositions of our capital stock, which will involve an effective change of control, without the consent of The Coca-Cola Company. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—The Shareholders Agreement.”

We have also entered into tradename license agreements with The Coca-Cola Company pursuant to which we are authorized to use certain trademark names of The Coca-Cola Company with our corporate name. These agreements have a ten-year term and are automatically renewed for ten-year terms, but are terminated if we cease to manufacture, market, sell and distribute Coca-Cola trademark products pursuant to the bottler agreements or if the shareholders agreement is terminated. The Coca-Cola Company also has the right to terminate a license agreement if we use its trademark names in a manner not authorized by the bottler agreements.

 

41


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

Over the past several years, we made significant capital investments to modernize our facilities and improve operating efficiency and productivity, including:

 

   

increasing the annual capacity of our bottling plants by installing new production lines;

 

   

installing clarification facilities to process different types of sweeteners;

 

   

installing plastic bottle-blowing equipment;

 

   

modifying equipment to increase flexibility to produce different presentations, including faster sanitation and changeover times on production lines; and

 

   

closing obsolete production facilities.

In 2013, we began the construction of a production plant in Tocancipa, Colombia, which was completed and began operations in February 2015. This project required an investment of 459 billion Colombian pesos (approximately US$194 million). We believe that the plant has the capacity to generate approximately 800 direct and indirect jobs. The plant is located on a parcel of land 298,000 square meters in size, and has an annual production capacity of approximately 730 million liters of sparkling beverages (or approximately 130 million unit cases), representing an increase of approximately 35.0% as compared to the current installed capacity of our plants in Colombia.

In 2012, we began the construction of a production plant in Minas Gerais, Brazil, which was completed and began operations in November 2014. This project required an investment of 619 million Brazilian reais (equivalent to approximately US$260 million). We believe that the plant has the capacity to generate approximately 700 direct and indirect jobs. The plant is located on a parcel of land 320,000 square meters in size, and has an annual production capacity of approximately 1.2 billion liters of sparkling beverages (or approximately 200 million unit cases), representing an increase of approximately 62.0% as compared to the current installed capacity of our plant in Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Capital Expenditures.”

As of December 31, 2015, we owned 44 bottling plants company-wide. By country, as of such date, we had 17 bottling facilities in Mexico, 5 in Central America, 7 in Colombia, 4 in Venezuela, 9 in Brazil and 2 in Argentina.

As of December 31, 2015, we operated 276 distribution centers, approximately 53.0% of which were in our Mexican territories. As of such date, we owned more than 84.0% of these distribution centers and leased the remainder. See “—The Company—Product Sales and Distribution.”

We maintain an “all risk” insurance policy covering our properties (owned and leased), machinery and equipment and inventories as well as losses due to business interruptions. The policy covers damages caused by natural disaster, including hurricane, hail, earthquake and damages caused by human acts, including explosion, fire, vandalism and riot; we also maintain a freight transport insurance policy that covers damages to goods in transit. In addition, we maintain a liability insurance policy that covers product liability. We purchase our insurance coverage through an insurance broker. In 2015, the policies for “all risk” property insurance and liability insurance were issued by Mapfre Tepeyac, S.A. and the policy for freight transport insurance was issued by ACE Seguros, S.A. We believe that our coverage is consistent with the coverage maintained by similar companies.

 

42


Table of Contents

The table below summarizes by country principal use, installed capacity and percentage utilization of our production facilities:

Bottling Facility Summary

As of December 31, 2015

 

Country

   Installed Capacity
(thousands of unit cases)
     Utilization (1)
(%)
 

Mexico

     2,786,295         62

Guatemala

     37,931         77

Nicaragua

     66,847         71

Costa Rica

     70,587         66

Panama

     49,646         69

Colombia

     572,978         57

Venezuela

     290,391         81

Brazil

     1,228,126         55

Argentina

     328,441         71

 

(1) Annualized rate.

The table below summarizes by country plant location and facility area of our production facilities:

Bottling Facility by Location

As of December 31, 2015

 

Country

  

Plant

   Facility Area  
         

(thousands

of sq. meters)

 

Mexico

   San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas      45   
   Cuautitlan, Estado de Mexico      35   
   Los Reyes la Paz, Estado de Mexico      50   
   Toluca, Estado de Mexico      317   
   Leon, Guanajuato      124   
   Morelia, Michoacan      50   
   Ixtacomitan, Tabasco      117   
   Apizaco, Tlaxcala      80   
   Coatepec, Veracruz      142   
   La Pureza Altamira, Tamaulipas      300   
   Poza Rica, Veracruz      42   
   Pacifico, Estado de Mexico      89   
   Cuernavaca, Morelos      37   
   Toluca, Estado de Mexico (Ojuelos)      41   
   San Juan del Rio, Queretaro      84   
   Queretaro, Queretaro      80   
   Cayaco, Acapulco      104   

Guatemala

   Guatemala City      46   

Nicaragua

   Managua      54   

Costa Rica

   Calle Blancos, San Jose      52   
   Coronado, San Jose      14   

Panama

   Panama City      29   

Colombia

   Barranquilla      37   
   Bogota, DC      105   
   Bucaramanga      26   
   Cali      76   
   Manantial, Cundinamarca      67   
   Tocancipa      298   
   Medellin      47   

 

43


Table of Contents

Country

  

Plant

   Facility Area  
         

(thousands

of sq. meters)

 

Venezuela

   Antimano      15   
   Barcelona      141   
   Maracaibo      68   
   Valencia      100   

Brazil

   Campo Grande      36   
   Jundiai      191   
   Mogi das Cruzes      119   
   Porto Real      108   
   Maringa      160   
   Marilia      159   
   Curitiba      119   
   Bauru      39   
   Itabirito      320   

Argentina

   Alcorta, Buenos Aires      73   
   Monte Grande, Buenos Aires      32   

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

The table below sets forth all of our direct and indirect significant subsidiaries and the percentage of equity of each subsidiary we owned directly or indirectly as of December 31, 2015:

 

Name of Company

  

Jurisdiction of
Incorporation

   Percentage
Owned
   

Description

Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   Mexico      100.0   Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.

Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   Mexico      100.0   Holding company of manufacturers and distributors of beverages.

Spal Industria Brasileira de Bebidas, S.A.

   Brazil      96.1   Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.

Distribuidora y Manufacturera del Valle de México, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   Mexico      100.0   Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.

Servicios Refresqueros del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   Mexico      100.0   Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.

Coca-Cola FEMSA de Argentina, S.A.

   Argentina      100.0   Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.

 

Item 4.A. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

 

44


Table of Contents
Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

General

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, our consolidated financial statements including the notes thereto. Our consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB.

Average Price Per Unit Case . We use average price per unit case to analyze average pricing trends in the different territories where we operate. We calculate average price per unit case by dividing net sales by total sales volume. Sales of beer in Brazil, which are not included in our sales volumes, are excluded from this calculation.

Effects of Changes in Economic Conditions . Our results are affected by changes in economic conditions in Mexico, Brazil and in the other countries where we operate. For the year ended December 31, 2015, approximately 70% of our total revenues were attributable to Mexico and Brazil. In addition to Mexico and Brazil, we also conduct operations in Central America (including Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama), Colombia, Venezuela and Argentina. Our results are affected by the economic conditions in the countries where we conduct operations. Some of these economies continue to be heavily influenced by the U.S. economy, and therefore, deterioration in economic conditions in the U.S. economy may affect these economies. Deterioration or prolonged periods of weak economic conditions in the countries where we conduct operations may have, and in the past have had, a negative effect on our company and a material adverse effect on our results and financial condition. Our business may also be significantly affected by the interest rates, inflation rates and exchange rates of the local currencies of the countries where we operate. Decreases in growth rates, periods of negative growth and/or increases in inflation or interest rates may result in lower demand for our products, lower real pricing of our products or a shift to lower margin products. In addition, an increase in interest rates would increase the cost to us of variable rate funding, which would have an adverse effect on our financial position.

Recent Developments in the Venezuelan Exchange Control Regime. Prior to 2014, we had historically used the official exchange rate in our Venezuelan operations. However, since the beginning of 2014, the Venezuelan government has announced a series of changes to the Venezuelan exchange control regime, approving alternative exchanges rates in addition to the official exchange rate. In January 2014, the Venezuelan government announced an exchange rate determined by the state-run system known as the Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas , or SICAD. In March 2014, the Venezuelan government announced a new law that authorized an alternative method of exchanging Venezuelan bolivars to U.S. dollars known as SICAD II. In February 2015, the Venezuelan government announced that it was replacing SICAD II with a new market-based exchange rate determined by the system known as the Sistema Marginal de Divisas , or SIMADI. In February 2016, the Venezuelan government announced a 37.0% devaluation of the official exchange rate and changed the existing three-tier exchange rate system into a dual system by combining the official exchange rate and the SICAD exchange rate into a single official exchange rate and maintaining the SIMADI exchange rate. The decision was part of a package of economic policies intended to mitigate the economic crisis of the member countries of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). In March 2016, the Venezuelan government announced that it was replacing the SIMADI exchange rate with a new market-based exchange rate known as Divisas Complementarias , or DICOM, and the official exchange rate with a preferential exchange rate denominated Divisa Protegida , or DIPRO. The DIPRO exchange rate is determined by the Venezuelan government and may be used to settle imports of a list of goods and raw materials which has not been published yet as of the date of this annual report. The DICOM exchange rate is determined based on supply and demand of U.S. dollars. As of April 8, 2016, the DIPRO and DICOM exchange rates were 10 bolivars and 306.07 bolivars per U.S. dollar, respectively.

We translated our results of operations in Venezuela for the full year ended December 31, 2015 into our reporting currency, the Mexican peso, using the SIMADI exchange rate of 198.70 bolivars to US$1.00, which was the exchange rate in effect as of such date. As a result, in 2015, we recognized a further reduction in equity of Ps.2,687 million. We will closely monitor any further developments in Venezuela, which may affect the exchange rates used by us to translate the results of our Venezuelan subsidiary in the future.

Critical Accounting Judgments and Estimates

In the application of our accounting policies, management is required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised, if the revision affects only that period, or in the period of the revision and future periods, if the revision affects both current and future periods. For a description of all of our critical accounting judgments and estimates, see Note 2.3 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

45


Table of Contents

New Accounting Pronouncements

For a description of the new IFRS and amendments to IFRS adopted during 2015, see Note 2.4 to our consolidated financial statements.

Results

The following table sets forth our consolidated income statements for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015 (1)     2015     2014     2013 (2)  
    

(in millions of Mexican pesos or millions of

U.S. dollars, except per share data)

 

Revenues:

        

Net sales

   US$ 8,835      Ps. 151,914      Ps. 146,948      Ps. 155,175   

Other operating revenues

     26        446        350        836   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

     8,861        152,360        147,298        156,011   

Cost of goods sold

     4,671        80,330        78,916        83,076   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     4,190        72,030        68,382        72,935   

Costs and expenses:

        

Administrative expenses

     372        6,405        6,385        6,487   

Selling expenses

     2,436        41,879        40,465        44,828   

Other income

     36        620        1,001        478   

Other expenses

     138        2,368        1,159        1,101   

Interest expenses

     369        6,337        5,546        3,341   

Interest income

     24        414        379        654   

Foreign exchange (loss) gain, net

     (85     (1,459     (968     (739

(Loss) gain on monetary position for subsidiaries in hyperinflationary economies

     (2     (33     (312     (393

Market value (gain) loss on financial instruments

     (8     (142     (25     (46
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income taxes and share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method

     856        14,725        14,952        17,224   

Income taxes

     265        4,551        3,861        5,731   

Share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes

     9        155        (125     289   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

     600        10,329        10,966        11,782   

Equity holders of the parent

     595        10,235        10,542        11,543   

Non-controlling interest

     5        94        424        239   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

     600        10,329        10,966        11,782   

Per share data:

        

Earnings per share (3)

     0.29        4.94        5.09        5.61   

 

(1) Translation to U.S. dollar amounts at an exchange rate of Ps.17.20 to US$1.00 solely for the convenience of the reader.
(2) Includes results of CCFPI from February 2013 using the equity method, results of Grupo Yoli from June 2013, Companhia Fluminense from September 2013 and Spaipa from November 2013. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Corporate History.”
(3) Computed of the basis of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period: 2,072.92 million in 2015 and 2014 and 2,056.20 million in 2013.

 

46


Table of Contents

Operations by Consolidated Reporting Segment

The following table sets forth certain financial information for each of our consolidated reporting segments for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013. See Note 25 to our consolidated financial statements for additional information about all of our consolidated reporting segments.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015      2014      2013  
     (in millions of Mexican pesos)  

Total revenues

        

Mexico and Central America (1)

     78,709         71,965         70,679   

South America (excluding Venezuela) (2)

     64,752         66,367         53,774   

Venezuela

     8,899         8,966         31,558   

Gross profit

        

Mexico and Central America (1)

     40,130         36,453         34,941   

South America (excluding Venezuela) (2)

     27,532         27,372         22,374   

Venezuela

     4,368         4,557         15,620   

 

(1) Includes Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. Includes results of Grupo Yoli from June 2013.

 

(2) Includes Colombia, Brazil and Argentina. Includes results of Companhia Fluminense from September 2013 and Spaipa from November 2013.

Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2014

Consolidated Results

The comparability of our underlying financial and operating performance in 2015 as compared to 2014 was affected by the following factors: (1) translation effects from fluctuations in exchange rates and (2) our results of operations in territories that are considered hyperinflationary economies (currently, our only operation that is considered a hyperinflationary economy is Venezuela). To translate the full-year 2015 reported results of Venezuela, we used the SIMADI exchange rate of 198.70 bolivars per U.S. dollar, as compared to 49.99 bolivars per U.S. dollar used to translate our 2014 reported results. In addition, the average depreciations to the U.S. dollar of currencies used in our main operations during 2015, as compared to 2014, were: 41.6% for the Brazilian real, 37.0% for the Colombian peso, 19.2% for the Mexican peso and 14.1% for the Argentine peso.

Total Revenues. Our reported consolidated total revenues increased 3.4% to Ps.152,360 million in 2015 despite the negative translation effect resulting from using the SIMADI exchange rate to translate the results of our Venezuelan operations and the depreciation of the Brazilian real, the Colombian peso, the Mexican peso and the Argentine peso. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations and the results of our Venezuelan operations, total revenues would have grown 8.6%, driven by the growth of the average price per unit case in all of our operations and volume growth in Mexico, Central America, Colombia and Argentina.

Total reported sales volume increased 0.5% to 3,435.6 million unit cases in 2015, as compared to 2014. Excluding the results of our Venezuelan operations, total volume would have grown 0.7% in 2015, as compared to 2014. Our sparkling beverage portfolio grew 0.5% as compared to 2014. Excluding the effect of our Venezuelan operations, the sparkling beverage portfolio would have grown 0.7% as a result of positive performance of the Coca-Cola brand in Mexico, Colombia and Central America, and our flavored sparkling beverage portfolio in Mexico, Colombia, Argentina and Central America. The still beverage category grew 4.9% as compared to 2014. Excluding the effect of our Venezuelan operations, the still beverage category would have grown 6.5% driven by the positive performance of Jugos del Valle juice in Colombia, Mexico and Central America; ValleFrut orangeade in Mexico and Brazil; the Powerade brand across most of our territories and the Santa Clara dairy business in Mexico. Bottled water, excluding bulk water, grew 2.3% as compared to 2014. Excluding the effect of our Venezuelan operations, bottled water, excluding bulk water, would have grown 1.8%, driven by growth in Colombia, Argentina, Brazil and Central America. Bulk water decreased 2.9% as compared to 2014, mainly driven by a contraction of the Ciel brand in Mexico.

Consolidated reported average price per unit case grew 3.5% reaching Ps.42.34 in 2015, as compared to Ps.40.92 in 2014, despite the negative translation effect resulting from using the SIMADI exchange rate to translate the results of our Venezuelan operations and the depreciation of the Brazilian real, the Colombian peso and the Argentine peso. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations and our Venezuelan operations, average price per unit case would have grown 8.8% in 2015, driven by average price per unit case increases in local currency in each of our operations.

 

47


Table of Contents

Gross Profit. Our reported gross profit increased 5.3% to Ps.72,030 million in 2015, with a gross margin expansion of 90 basis points. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations and the results of our Venezuelan operations, gross profit would have grown 10.3%, with a gross margin expansion of 70 basis points. In local currency, the benefit of lower sweetener and PET prices, in combination with our currency hedging strategy, was partially offset by the depreciation of the average exchange rate of the Brazilian real, the Colombian peso, the Mexican peso and the Argentine peso as applied to U.S. dollar-denominated raw material costs.

The components of cost of goods sold include raw materials (principally concentrate, sweeteners and packaging materials), depreciation costs attributable to our production facilities, wages and other labor costs at our production facilities and certain overhead costs. Concentrate prices are determined as a percentage of the retail price of our products in the local currency, net of applicable taxes. Packaging materials, mainly PET and aluminum, and HFCS, used as a sweetener in some countries, are denominated in U.S. dollars.

Administrative and Selling Expenses. Our reported administrative and selling expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased 10 basis points to 31.7% in 2015 as compared to 2014. Our reported administrative and selling expenses in absolute terms increased 3.1% as compared to 2014. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations and the results of our Venezuelan operations, administrative and selling expenses as a percentage of total revenues would have remained flat and absolute administrative and selling expenses would have grown 8.7% as compared to 2014. In local currency, operating expenses as a percentage of revenues decreased in Mexico, Venezuela and Argentina. In 2015, we continued investing across our territories to support marketplace execution, increase cooler coverage and bolster returnable presentation base.

Other Expenses Net.   We recorded other expenses net of Ps.1,748 million in 2015, mainly due to certain restructuring charges and the negative operating currency fluctuation effects across our territories.

Comprehensive Financing Result. The term “comprehensive financing result” refers to the combined financial effects of net interest expenses, net financial foreign exchange gains or losses, and net gains or losses on the monetary position of hyperinflationary countries where we operate. Net financial foreign exchange gains or losses represent the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on financial assets or liabilities denominated in currencies other than local currencies, and gains or losses resulting from derivative financial instruments. A financial foreign exchange loss arises if a liability is denominated in a foreign currency that appreciates relative to the local currency between the date the liability is incurred or the beginning of the period, whichever occurs first, and the date it is repaid or the end of the period, whichever occurs first, as the appreciation of the foreign currency results in an increase in the amount of local currency, which must be exchanged to repay the specified amount of the foreign currency liability.

Reported comprehensive financing result in 2015 recorded an expense of Ps.7,273 million as compared to an expense of Ps.6,422 million in 2014. This increase was mainly driven by a foreign exchange loss as a result of the depreciation of the end-of-period exchange rate of the Mexican peso during the year, as applied to our U.S. dollar-denominated net debt position.

Income Taxes. During 2015, reported income tax, as a percentage of income before taxes, was 30.6% as compared to 26.0% in 2014. The lower effective tax rate registered during 2014 is mainly related to a one-time benefit resulting from the settlement of certain contingent tax liabilities under the tax amnesty program offered by the Brazilian tax authorities, which was not repeated in 2015.

Net Controlling Interest Income (Equity holders of the parent). Our reported consolidated net controlling interest income reached Ps. 10,235 million in 2015 as compared to Ps. 10,542 million in 2014. Earnings per share in 2015 were Ps. 4.94 (Ps. 49.37 per ADS) computed on the basis of 2,072.9 million shares outstanding (each ADS represents 10 Series L shares).

Share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes. In 2015, we reported a gain of Ps.155 million in the share of the profits of associates and joint ventures line, mainly due to an equity method gain from our participation in associated companies and in CCFPI.

 

48


Table of Contents

Results by Consolidated Reporting Segment

Mexico and Central America

Total Revenues. Reported total revenues from our Mexico and Central America division increased 9.4% to Ps. 78,709 million in 2015. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations, total revenues from our Mexico and Central America division would have grown 7.0%, driven by positive volume performance and average price increases in both Mexico and Central America.

Reported total sales volume increased 1.8% to 1,952.4 million unit cases in 2015, as compared to 2014. The sparkling beverage portfolio grew 3.0% driven by 2.4% growth of the Coca-Cola brand and 5.5% growth of our flavored sparkling beverages. Our bottled water portfolio, including bulk water, decreased 3.5% driven by a contraction of the Ciel brand. The still beverage category grew 5.8%.

Total sales volume in Mexico grew 1.7% to 1,784.5 million unit cases, as compared to 1,754.9 million unit cases in 2014. Volume of our sparkling beverage portfolio grew 3.1% driven by 2.6% growth of the Coca-Cola brand and 5.8% growth of our flavored sparkling beverages, mainly supported by the performance of Mundet , Fanta and the introduction of Naranja&Nada and Limon&Nada, our sparkling orangeade and lemonade. The still beverage portfolio grew 5.3% favored by the del Valle portfolio, Powerade brand and our Santa Clara dairy business. Our bottled water portfolio, including bulk water, decreased 3.7% driven by a contraction of the Ciel brand.

Total sales volume in Central America increased 2.6% to 167.8 million unit cases, as compared to 163.6 million unit cases in 2014. The sales volume of our sparkling beverage portfolio grew 1.5% supported by the strong performance of the Coca-Cola brand and flavored sparkling beverages in Nicaragua and Panama. Sales volume in our still beverage category increased 8.5%, due to the performance of the Powerade brand in Central America, Fuze tea in Costa Rica and Hi-C juice in Nicaragua. The bottled water business, including bulk water, grew 7.6% across the region.

Gross Profit. Our reported gross profit increased 10.1% to Ps. 40,133 million in 2015 as compared to 2014, and reported gross margin increased 30 basis points to reach 51.0% in 2015. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations, gross profit would have grown 7.9% in 2015 with a margin expansion of 50 basis points. Lower sweetener and PET prices in the division, in combination with our currency hedging strategy, were partially offset by the depreciation of the average exchange rate of most of our division’s currencies as applied to our U.S. dollar-denominated raw material costs.

Administrative and Selling Expenses. Reported administrative and selling expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased 20 basis points to 33.2% in 2015, as compared to 2014. Reported administrative and selling expenses in absolute terms increased 8.6%, as compared to 2014. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations, administrative and selling expenses in absolute terms would have grown 6.5% during the year, a decrease of 10 basis points as a percentage of total revenues.

South America (excluding Venezuela)

Total Revenues . Reported total revenues, excluding Venezuela, decreased 2.4% to Ps. 64,752 million in 2015, as compared to 2014, mainly driven by the negative translation effect resulting from the devaluation of the Brazilian real, the Colombian peso and the Argentine peso as compared to the Mexican peso. Revenues of beer accounted for Ps. 6,459 million. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations, total revenues would have grown 10.8%, driven by average price per unit case increases in local currency in each of the operations of our South America division.

Total sales volume in our South America division, excluding Venezuela, decreased 0.8% to 1,247.6 million unit cases in 2015, as compared to 2014, as a result of a volume contraction in Brazil which was partially offset by volume growth in Colombia and Argentina. The still beverage portfolio grew 7.5%, mainly driven by the Jugos del Valle line of business in Colombia, and Cepita and Hi-C brands in Argentina. Our bottled water portfolio, including bulk water, increased 7.5%, mainly driven by the Aquarius, Kin and Bonaqua brands in Argentina, the Manantial and Brisa brands in Colombia, and the Crystal brand in Brazil. The sparkling beverage portfolio decreased 2.3%, as compared to 2014.

Total sales volume in Colombia increased 7.2% to 320.0 million unit cases in 2015, as compared to 298.4 million unit cases in 2014. The sales volume in the sparkling beverage category grew 6.2%, mainly driven by a 3.7% growth of the Coca-Cola brand and a 14.2% increase of flavored sparkling beverages. Sales volume in the still beverage category increased 19.1%, mainly driven by the del Valle Fresh and Fuze tea brands. Our bottled water business, including bulk water, increased 5.8% driven by the Manantial and Brisa brands in single serve presentations.

 

49


Table of Contents

Total sales volume in Argentina increased 3.6% to 233.9 million unit cases in 2015, as compared to 225.8 million unit cases in 2014. The sales volume in the sparkling beverage category decreased 0.2%. A decrease in the Coca-Cola brand was mostly offset by the performance of the Sprite and Schweppes brands. Sales volume in the still beverage category increased 31.9%, mainly driven by the Hi-C, Cepita and Powerade brands. Our bottled water business, including bulk water, increased 28.0% driven by the Aquarius, Kin and Bonaqua brands.

Reported total sales volume in Brazil decreased 5.4% to 693.6 million unit cases in 2015, as compared to 733.5 million unit cases in 2014. Sales volume in our bottled water business, including bulk water, increased 1.2% driven by the Crystal brand. The volume of our sparkling beverage portfolio contracted 5.8%. The sales volume in our still beverage category decreased 8.8%.

Gross Profit . Reported gross profit, excluding Venezuela, reached Ps. 27,532 million, an increase of 0.6% in 2015, as compared to 2014, with an increase of 130 basis points to 42.5%. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations, gross profit would have grown 14.0% during the year, a gross margin expansion of 120 basis points. Lower sweetener and PET prices, in combination with our currency hedging strategy, were partially offset by the depreciation of the average exchange rate of each of our division’s currencies as applied to our U.S. dollar-denominated raw material costs.

Administrative and Selling Expenses. Reported administrative and selling expenses, excluding Venezuela, as a percentage of total revenues increased 40 basis points to 30.0% in 2015, as compared to 2014. Reported administrative and selling expenses in absolute terms decreased 1.3%, as compared to 2014, mainly driven by the negative translation effect resulting from the depreciation of the Brazilian real, the Colombian peso and the Argentine peso. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations, administrative and selling expenses in absolute terms would have grown 11.8%, an increase of 30 basis points as a percentage of revenues.

Venezuela

Total Revenues. Reported total revenues in Venezuela decreased 0.8% to reach Ps. 8,899 million in 2015 as compared to 2014, driven by the negative translation effect resulting from using the SIMADI exchange rate to translate the results of our Venezuelan operation. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations, revenues would have grown 237.5% driven by an increase of 245.4% in the average price per unit case in local currency.

Total sales volume decreased 2.3% to 235.6 million unit cases in 2015, as compared to 241.1 million unit cases in 2014. The sales volume in the sparkling beverage category decreased 2.1%, driven by a contraction in our flavored sparkling beverage portfolio, which was partially offset by the positive performance of the Coca-Cola brand, which grew 3.4%. The still beverage category decreased 11.3%. Our bottled water business, including bulk water, grew 6.1% driven by the Nevada brand.

Gross Profit. Reported gross profit was Ps. 4,368 million in 2015, a decrease of 4.1% as compared to 2014, with a gross margin contraction of 170 basis points reaching 49.1%, driven by the negative translation effect resulting from using the SIMADI exchange rate to translate the results of our Venezuelan operation into Mexican pesos. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations, gross profit would have grown 226.0%, a gross margin contraction of 170 basis points.

Administrative and Selling Expenses. Reported administrative and selling expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased 410 basis points to 31.0% in 2015, as compared to 2014. Reported administrative and selling expenses in absolute terms decreased 12.3%, as compared to 2014, due to the previously mentioned negative currency translation effect. Excluding the effect of currency fluctuations, administrative and selling expenses would have grown 198.0%, a decrease of 410 basis points as a percentage of total revenues.

Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2013

Consolidated Results

Total Revenues. Our reported consolidated total revenues decreased 5.6% to Ps.147,298 million in 2014, as compared to 2013, mainly due to the negative translation effect resulting from the use of the SICAD II exchange rate to translate the results of our Venezuelan operations to Mexican pesos. Excluding the non-comparable effects of Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa in Brazil and Grupo Yoli in Mexico, total revenues were Ps.134,088 in 2014, a decrease of 14.1% with respect to 2013. On a currency neutral basis and excluding the non-comparable effects of Companhia Fluminense, Spaipa and Grupo Yoli in 2014, total revenues grew 24.7%, driven by average price per unit case increases in most of our territories, and volume growth in Brazil, Colombia, Venezuela and Central America.

 

50


Table of Contents

Total sales volume increased 6.6% to 3,417.3 million unit cases in 2014, as compared to 2013. Excluding the integration of Grupo Yoli in Mexico and Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa in Brazil, volumes declined 0.7% to 3,182.8 million unit cases in 2014. This decrease was mainly due to a volume decline in our Mexican operation as a result of price increases implemented to offset the effect of the recently imposed excise tax on sweetened beverages. On the same basis, our bottled water portfolio grew 5.0%, mainly driven by the performance of the Crystal brand in Brazil, the Aquarius and Bonaqua brands in Argentina, the Nevada brand in Venezuela and the Manantial brand in Colombia. The still beverage category grew 1.9%, mainly driven by the performance of the Jugos del Valle line of business in Colombia, Venezuela and Brazil, and the Powerade brand across most of our territories. These increases partially compensated for the performance of our sparkling beverage category, which declined 0.9%, driven by the volume decline in our Mexican operations and a 3.5% volume decline in our bulk water business.

Consolidated average price per unit case decreased 13.2%, reaching Ps.40.92 in 2014, as compared to Ps.47.15 in 2013. This decline was driven by the negative translation effect in the results of our Venezuelan operations discussed above. In local currency, average price per unit case increased in all of our territories, except for Colombia.

Gross Profit. Our reported gross profit decreased 6.2% to Ps.68,382 million in 2014, as compared to 2013, mainly due to the negative translation effect in the results of our Venezuelan operations discussed above. In local currency, lower sweetener and PET prices in most of our operations were offset by the depreciation of the average exchange rate of the Argentine peso, the Brazilian real, the Colombian peso and the Mexican peso as applied to our U.S. dollar-denominated raw material costs. Reported gross margin reached 46.4% in 2014.

The components of cost of goods sold include raw materials (principally concentrate, sweeteners and packaging materials), depreciation costs attributable to our production facilities, wages and other employment costs associated with the labor force employed at our production facilities and certain overhead costs. Concentrate prices are determined as a percentage of the retail price of our products in local currency net of applicable taxes. Packaging materials, mainly PET and aluminum, and HFCS, used as a sweetener in some countries, are denominated in U.S. dollars.

Administrative and Selling Expenses. Administrative and selling expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased 110 basis points to 31.8% in 2014 as compared to 2013. Administrative and selling expenses in absolute terms decreased 8.7%, mainly as a result of the lower contribution of our Venezuelan operations driven by the negative translation effect discussed above. In local currency, operating expenses decreased as a percentage of revenues in most of our territories, despite the continued marketing investments to support our marketplace execution and bolster our returnable packaging base across our operations, higher labor costs in Venezuela and Argentina and higher freight costs in Brazil and Venezuela.

Other Expenses Net . We recorded other expenses net of Ps.548 million in 2014. These expenses were mainly driven by (i) an operating currency fluctuation effect in Venezuela recorded during the second quarter of 2014, (ii) an operating currency fluctuation effect across our territories in the fourth quarter of 2014, (iii) restructuring charges mainly in our Mexican operations and (iv) a loss on the sale of certain fixed assets.

Comprehensive Financing Result. Our comprehensive financing result in 2014 recorded an expense of Ps.6,422 million as compared to an expense of Ps.3,773 million in 2013. This increase was mainly driven by higher interest expense due to a larger debt position and a foreign exchange loss mainly as a result of the depreciation of the end-of-period exchange rate of the Mexican peso during the year as applied to a higher U.S. dollar-denominated net debt position.

Income Taxes. Income taxes decreased to Ps.3,861 million, from Ps.5,731 million in 2013. In 2014, income taxes, as a percentage of income before income taxes and share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, were 25.8% as compared to 33.3% in 2013. The lower effective tax rate registered during 2014 was mainly driven by (i) a smaller contribution from our Venezuelan subsidiary (resulting from the use of the SICAD II rate for translation purposes) which carries a higher effective tax rate, (ii) the inflationary tax effects in Venezuela, and (iii) a one-time benefit related to the settlement of certain contingent tax liabilities under the tax amnesty program offered by the Brazilian tax authorities, which was registered during the third quarter of 2014.

 

51


Table of Contents

Share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes. In 2014, we reported a loss of Ps.125 million in share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes, mainly due to an equity method loss of CCFPI, which was partially compensated by an equity method gain from our non-carbonated joint ventures in Mexico and Brazil.

On January 25, 2013, as part of our efforts to expand our geographic reach, we acquired a 51.0% non-controlling majority stake in CCFPI from The Coca-Cola Company. In 2014, we recognized an equity loss of Ps.334 million regarding our economic interest in CCFPI. In 2014, we reported our equity method investment in CCFPI as a separate reporting segment. For further information see Notes 9 and 25 to our consolidated financial statements.

Net Controlling Interest Income (Equity holders of the parent). Our consolidated net controlling interest income decreased 8.7% to Ps.10,542 million in 2014, as compared to 2013, mainly as a result of the lower contribution of our Venezuelan operations driven by the negative translation effect discussed above. Earnings per share in 2014 were Ps.5.09 (Ps.50.86 per ADS) computed on the basis of 2,072.9 million outstanding shares (each ADS represents 10 Series L shares) as of December 31, 2014.

Results by Consolidated Reporting Segment

Mexico and Central America

Total Revenues. Reported total revenues from our Mexico and Central America division increased 1.8% to Ps.71,965 million in 2014, as compared to 2013, driven by the integration of Grupo Yoli in our Mexican operations. Excluding the non-comparable effect of Grupo Yoli in Mexico in 2014, total revenues decreased 0.5% as a result of a volume decline in Mexico related to price increases implemented to offset the effect of the recently imposed excise tax on sweetened beverages. On a currency neutral basis and excluding the non-comparable effect of Grupo Yoli in Mexico in 2014, total revenues in the division decreased 0.6%.

Total sales volume decreased 1.8% to 1,918.5 million unit cases in 2014, as compared to 2013. Excluding the non-comparable effect of Grupo Yoli in Mexico in 2014, total volume decreased 3.8%. On the same basis, a 4.6% volume contraction in Mexico was partially compensated by a 5.1% volume increase in Central America, mainly driven by growth in Nicaragua and Guatemala. Our bottled water portfolio, including bulk water, decreased 2.7%. Our sparkling beverage category and our still beverage category decreased 3.9% and 6.9%, respectively.

Total sales volume in Mexico decreased 2.4% to 1,754.9 million unit cases in 2014, as compared to 1,798.0 million unit cases in 2013. Excluding the non-comparable effect of Grupo Yoli in Mexico, total volume decreased 4.6% to 1,715.2 million unit cases. The volume contraction in our Mexican operation was driven by the price increase implemented in the country as a result of the excise tax on sweetened beverages. On the same basis, sales volume of our sparkling beverage category, our bottled water portfolio, our bulk water business and our still beverage category decreased 4.8%, 2.3%, 3.2% and 8.8%, respectively.

Total sales volume in Central America increased 5.1% to 163.6 million unit cases in 2014, as compared to 155.6 million unit cases in 2013. The sales volume in our sparkling beverage category grew 5.0%, mainly driven by the strong performance of the Coca-Cola brand in Guatemala and Nicaragua, which grew 8.9% and 7.1%, respectively. Sales volume in the still beverage category increased 3.9%, due to the performance of the Powerade brand in Guatemala and Panama and the Hi-C brand in Nicaragua. The bottled water business, including bulk water, grew 11.4%, mainly driven by the performance of the Alpina and Dasani brands.

Gross Profit. Our reported gross profit increased 4.3% to Ps.36,453 million in 2014, as compared to 2013. Lower sweetener and PET prices in the division were partially offset by the depreciation of the average exchange rate of most of our division’s currencies as applied to our U.S. dollar-denominated raw material costs. Reported gross margin reached 50.7% in 2014, an increase of 122 basis points as compared with the previous year.

Administrative and Selling Expenses. Administrative and selling expenses as a percentage of total revenues increased 30 basis points to 33.4% in 2014, as compared with the same period in 2013. Administrative and selling expenses in absolute terms increased 2.9% as compared to 2013. Excluding the non-comparable effect of Grupo Yoli in 2014, administrative and selling expenses remained flat as compared to 2013 due to a tight expense control.

 

52


Table of Contents

South America (excluding Venezuela)

Total Revenues . Reported total revenues were Ps.66,367 million in 2014, an increase of 23.4% as compared to 2013, mainly due to the integration of the new territories in Brazil, average price per unit case increases in local currency in Argentina and Brazil, and volume growth in Colombia and Brazil (excluding Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa). Excluding beer, which accounted for Ps.7,117.7 million during 2014, total revenues increased 17.8% as compared to 2013. Excluding the non-comparable effect of Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa in 2014, total revenues increased 1.8%.

Total sales volume in our South America division, excluding Venezuela, increased 22.3% to 1,257.7 million unit cases in 2014 as compared to 2013, as a result of growth in Brazil and Colombia, which compensated for a volume decline in Argentina. Excluding the non-comparable effect of Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa in 2014, volumes increased 3.5% as compared to 2013. On the same basis, the still beverage portfolio grew 15.5%, mainly driven by the Jugos del Valle line of business in Colombia and Brazil and the performance of the Powerade brand in Argentina and Colombia. Our bottled water portfolio, including bulk water, increased 7.7% mainly driven by the Crystal brand in Brazil and the Aquarius and Bonaqua brands in Argentina. The sparkling beverage portfolio increased 2.1% as compared to 2013.

Total sales volume in Colombia increased 8.2% to 298.4 million unit cases in 2014, as compared to 275.7 million unit cases in 2013. The sales volume in the sparkling beverage category grew 8.1%, mainly driven by a 7.2% increase of the Coca-Cola brand. Sales volume in the still beverage category increased 34.8%, mainly driven by the performance of the Del Valle Fresh and FUZE tea brands. The bottled water business, including bulk water, decreased 2.2% mainly driven by the performance of the Brisa brand.

Total sales volume in Argentina decreased 0.6% to 225.7 million unit cases in 2014, as compared to 227.1 million unit cases in 2013. Sales volume in the sparkling beverage category decreased 2.5%. The bottled water business, including bulk water, increased 18.3%, driven by the Aquarius and Bonaqua brands. Sales volume in the still beverage category grew 7.5%, driven by the performance of the Powerade brand.

Total sales volume in Brazil increased 39.7% to 733.5 million unit cases in 2014, as compared to 525.2 million unit cases in 2013. Excluding the non-comparable effect of Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa in 2014, volume grew 2.7% to 539.5 million unit cases in 2014. On the same basis, sales volume in the bottled water business, including bulk water, increased 18.7%. Sales volume in the still beverage category increased 2.7%, mainly due to the performance of the Jugos del Valle line of business, and our sparkling beverage category increased 1.6%.

Gross Profit . Gross profit reached Ps.27,372 million, an increase of 22.3% in 2014, as compared to 2013. In local currency, cost of goods sold increased as a result of the depreciation of the average exchange rate of the Argentine peso, the Brazilian real and the Colombian peso as applied to our U.S. dollar-denominated raw material costs, which were partially compensated by lower PET prices in Colombia and Argentina, and lower sweetener prices in Argentina and Brazil. Reported gross margin reached 41.2% in 2014.

Administrative and Selling Expenses. Administrative and selling expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased 110 basis points to 29.3% in 2014, as compared to 2013. Administrative and selling expenses in absolute terms increased 18.9%, mainly as a result of the integration of the new franchises in Brazil. Excluding the non-comparable effect of Companhia Fluminense and Spaipa in Brazil in 2014, administrative and selling expenses remained flat as compared to 2013, despite continued marketing investments to support our marketplace execution and bolster our returnable packaging base in Brazil, higher labor costs in Argentina and higher freight costs in Brazil.

Venezuela

Total Revenues. Total revenues in Venezuela reached Ps.8,966 million in 2014, a decrease of 71.6% as compared to 2013, mainly due to the negative translation effect resulting from the use of the SICAD II exchange rate to translate the results of our Venezuelan operations to Mexican pesos. Average price per unit case was Ps.37.18 in 2014, a decrease of 73.7% as compared to 2013. On a currency neutral basis, our revenues in Venezuela increased by 100.3%.

Total sales volume increased 8.2% to 241.1 million unit cases in 2014, as compared to 222.9 million unit cases in 2013. The sales volume in the sparkling beverage category grew 8.4%, driven by the strong performance of the Coca-Cola brand, which grew 15.9%. The bottled water business, including bulk water, grew 1.5%. The still beverage category increased 12.0%, due to the performance of the Del Valle Fresh orangeade, Powerade and Kapo .

Gross Profit. Gross profit was Ps.4,557 million, a decrease of 70.8% in 2014, as compared to 2013, as a result of the negative translation effect in the results of our Venezuelan operations discussed above. In local currency, cost of goods sold increased as a result of higher sugar prices. Reported gross margin reached 50.8% in 2014, an increase of 132 basis points as compared with the previous year.

 

53


Table of Contents

Administrative and Selling Expenses. Administrative and selling expenses as a percentage of total revenues decreased 150 basis points to 35.1% in 2014, as compared to 2013. Administrative and selling expenses in absolute terms decreased 72.7% as compared to 2013, mainly as a result of the negative translation effect in the results of our Venezuelan operations discussed above. In local currency, administrative and selling expenses growth exceeded inflation growth as a consequence of higher labor and freight costs in the country.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity . The principal source of our liquidity is cash generated from operations. A significant majority of our sales are on a cash basis with the remainder on a short-term credit basis. We have traditionally been able to rely on cash generated from operations to fund our working capital requirements and our capital expenditures. Our working capital benefits from the fact that most of our sales are made on a cash basis, while we generally pay our suppliers on credit. In recent periods, we have mainly used cash generated from operations to fund acquisitions. We have also used a combination of borrowings from Mexican and international banks and bond issuances in the Mexican and international capital markets.

Our total indebtedness was Ps.66,730 million as of December 31, 2015, as compared to Ps.66,027 million as of December 31, 2014. Short-term debt and long-term debt were Ps.3,470 million and Ps.63,260 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2015, as compared to Ps.1,206 million and Ps.64,821 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014. Total debt increased Ps.703 million in 2015, compared to year end 2014. We had cash outflows in 2015 resulting from dividend payments and the prepayment of outstanding bank debt. As of December 31, 2015, our cash and cash equivalents were Ps.15,989 million, as compared to Ps.12,958 million as of December 31, 2014. As of December 31, 2015, our cash and cash equivalents were comprised of 66.4% U.S. dollars, 21.2% Mexican pesos, 6.4% Brazilian reais, 2.3% Venezuelan bolivars, 1.1% Argentine pesos, 1.3% Colombian pesos, 0.7% Costa Rican colones and 0.6% other legal currencies. As of March 31, 2016, our cash and cash equivalents balance, including restricted cash, was Ps.17,741 million including US$544 million denominated in U.S. dollars. We believe that these funds, in addition to the cash generated by our operations, are sufficient to meet our operating requirements.

Any further changes in the Venezuelan exchange control regime, and future currency devaluations or the imposition of exchange controls in any of the countries where we have operations could have an adverse effect on our financial position and liquidity.

As part of our financing policy, we expect to continue to finance our liquidity needs with cash. Nonetheless, as a result of regulations in certain countries where we operate, it may not be beneficial or, as in the case of exchange controls in Venezuela, practicable for us to remit cash generated in local operations to fund cash requirements in other countries. Exchange controls like those in Venezuela may also increase the real price of remitting cash to fund debt requirements in other countries. In the event that cash in these countries is not sufficient to fund future working capital requirements and capital expenditures, we may decide, or be required, to fund cash requirements in these countries through local borrowings rather than remitting funds from another country. In addition, our liquidity in Venezuela could be affected by changes in the rules applicable to exchange rates as well as other regulations, such as exchange controls. In the future we may finance our working capital and capital expenditure needs with short-term or other borrowings.

We continuously evaluate opportunities to pursue acquisitions or engage in strategic transactions. We would expect to finance any significant future transactions with a combination of any of cash, long-term indebtedness and the issuance of shares of our company.

Sources and Uses of Cash . The following table summarizes the sources and uses of cash for the years in the periods ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, from our consolidated statements of changes in cash flows:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015     2014     2013  
     (in millions of Mexican pesos)  

Net cash flows from operating activities

     23,202        24,406        22,097   

Net cash flows used in investing activities (1)

     (10,945     (11,137     (49,481

Net cash flows (used in)/from financing activities

     (8,567     (11,350     23,506   

Dividends paid

     (6,416     (6,030     (6,002

 

(1) Includes property, plant and equipment, investment in shares and other assets.

 

54


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The table below sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2015:

 

     As of December 31, 2015  
     Maturity
less than
1 year
    Maturity
1 –  3 years
     Maturity
4 –  5 years
     Maturity
in excess  of
5 years
     Total  
     (in millions of Mexican pesos)  

Debt (1)

             

Mexican pesos

     2,496        —           2,496         7,493         12,485   

U.S. dollars

     —          17,158         8,566         25,609         51,333   

Brazilian reais

     177        611         185         80         1,053   

Colombian pesos

     465        628         —           —           1,093   

Argentine pesos

     265        41         —           —           306   

Capital Leases

             

Brazilian reais

     67        131         113         149         460   

Interest Payments on Debt (2)

             

Mexican pesos

     864        2,237         1,112         580         4,793   

U.S. dollars

     1,288        4,217         2,350         13,030         20,885   

Brazilian reais

     2,928        5,207         31         12         8,178   

Colombian pesos

     68        18         —           —           86   

Argentine pesos

     42        6         —           —           48   

Cross Currency Swaps

             

Mexican pesos to U.S. dollars (3)

     —          1,899         —           —           1,899   

Brazilian reais to U.S. dollars (4)

     —          317         —           —           317   

Forwards

             

U.S. dollars to Mexican pesos (5)

     104        —           —           —           104   

U.S. dollars to Brazilian reais (6)

     112        —           —           —           112   

U.S. dollars to Colombian pesos (7)

     41        —           —           —           41   

U.S. dollars to Argentine pesos (8)

     126        —           —           —           126   

Options

             

U.S. dollars to Mexican pesos (9)

     57        —           —           —           57   

U.S. dollars to Colombian pesos (10)

     8        —           —           —           8   

Operating Leases

             

Mexican pesos

     114        368         129         264         875   

U.S. dollars

     87        271         90         177         625   

Commodity Hedge Contracts

             

Sugar (11)

     (190     —           —           —           (190

Aluminum (12)

     (84     —           —           —           (84
Expected Benefits to be Paid for Pension and Retirement Plans, Seniority Premiums and Post-employment      196        584         264         1,195         2,239   

 

(1) Excludes the effect of cross currency swaps.

 

(2) Interest was calculated using the contractual debt and nominal interest rates as of December 31, 2015. Liabilities denominated in U.S. dollars were converted to Mexican pesos at an exchange rate of Ps.17.20 per U.S. dollar, the exchange rate reported by Banco de México quoted to us by dealers for the settlement of obligations in foreign currencies on December 31, 2015.

 

(3) Cross-currency swaps used to convert U.S. dollar-denominated debt into Mexican peso-denominated debt with a notional amount of Ps.7,571 million with a maturity date as of 2018. These cross-currency swaps are considered hedges for accounting purposes, and are related to U.S. dollar-denominated senior notes. The amounts shown in the table are fair value figures as of December 31, 2015.

 

(4) Cross-currency swaps used to convert U.S. dollar-denominated debt into Brazilian real denominated debt with a notional amount of Ps. 23,143 million with a maturity date as of 2018. These cross-currency swaps are considered hedges for accounting purposes and the amounts shown in the table are fair value figures as of December 31, 2015.

 

55


Table of Contents
(5) Reflects the market value as of December 31, 2015 of forward derivative instruments used to hedge against fluctuation in the Mexican pesos. These instruments are considered hedges for accounting purposes. The amounts shown in the table are fair value figures as of December 31, 2015.

 

(6) Reflects the market value as of December 31, 2015 of forward derivative instruments used to hedge against fluctuation in the Brazilian real. These instruments are considered hedges for accounting purposes. The amounts shown in the table are fair value figures as of December 31, 2015.

 

(7) Reflects the market value as of December 31, 2015 of forward derivative instruments used to hedge against fluctuation in the Colombian pesos. These instruments are considered hedges for accounting purposes. The amounts shown in the table are fair value figures as of December 31, 2015.

 

(8) Reflects the market value as of December 31, 2015 of forward derivative instruments used to hedge against fluctuation in the Argentine pesos. These instruments are considered hedges for accounting purposes. The amounts shown in the table are fair value figures as of December 31, 2015.

 

(9) Reflects the market value as of December 31, 2015 of a call option derivative instrument used to hedge against fluctuation in the Mexican pesos. These instruments are considered hedges for accounting purposes. The amounts shown in the table are fair value figures as of December 31, 2015.

 

(10) Reflects the market value as of December 31, 2015 of a call option derivative instrument used to hedge against fluctuation in the Colombian pesos. These instruments are considered hedges for accounting purposes. The amounts shown in the table are fair value figures as of December 31, 2015.

 

(11) Reflects the market value as of December 31, 2015 of futures contracts used to hedge sugar cost. These instruments are considered hedges for accounting purposes. The amounts shown in the table are fair value figures as of December 31, 2015.

 

(12) Reflects the market value as of December 31, 2015 of futures and forwards contracts used to hedge aluminum cost. These instruments are considered hedges for accounting purposes. The amounts shown in the table are fair value figures as of December 31, 2015.

Debt Structure

The following chart sets forth the debt breakdown of our company and its subsidiaries by currency and interest rate type as of December 31, 2015:

 

Currency

   Percentage of Total Debt (1)(2)     Average Nominal  Rate (3)     Average Adjusted  Rate (1)(4)  

Mexican pesos

     28.2     5.6     5.0

U.S. dollars

     32.3     3.8     4.7

Colombian pesos

     1.7     6.5     6.5

Brazilian reais

     37.3     6.8     13.4

Argentine pesos

     0.5     28.0     28.0

 

(1) Includes the effects of our derivative contracts as of December 31, 2015, including cross currency swaps from U.S. dollars to Mexican pesos and U.S. dollars to Brazilian reais.

 

(2) Due to rounding, these figures may not equal 100.0%.

 

(3) Annual weighted average interest rate per currency as of December 31, 2015.

 

(4) Annual weighted average interest rate per currency as of December 31, 2015 after giving effect to interest rate swaps and cross currency swaps. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk—Interest Rate Risk.”

 

56


Table of Contents

Summary of Significant Debt Instruments

The following is a brief summary of our significant long-term indebtedness with restrictive covenants outstanding as of the date of this annual report:

Mexican Peso-Denominated Bonds (Certificados Bursátiles).

On May 24, 2013, we issued Ps.7,500 million aggregate principal amount of certificados bursátiles bearing a 5.46% coupon and due May 2023. These certificados bursátiles are guaranteed by Propimex, our main operating subsidiary in Mexico, Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Distribuidora y Manufacturera del Valle de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V. (as successor guarantor of Servicios Integrados Inmuebles del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V.), Yoli de Acapulco, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., or the Guarantors.

On April 18, 2011, we issued (i) Ps.2,500 million aggregate principal amount of 5-year floating rate certificados bursátiles , priced at 28-day TIIE plus 13 basis points, which matured and were repaid in full on April 11, 2016, and (ii) Ps.2,500 million aggregate amount of 10-year fixed rate certificados bursátiles bearing a 8.27% coupon. These two series of certificados bursátiles are guaranteed by the Guarantors.

We have the following certificados bursátiles outstanding in the Mexican securities market:

 

Issue Date

   Maturity    Amount    Rate  

2013

   May 12, 2023    Ps.7,500 million      5.46

2011

   April 5, 2021    Ps.2,500 million      8.27

 

(1) TIIE means the Tasa de Interés Interbancaria de Equilibrio (the Equilibrium Interbank Interest Rate).

Our certificados bursátiles contain reporting obligations pursuant to which we must furnish to the bondholders consolidated audited annual financial reports and consolidated quarterly financial reports.

2.375% Notes due 2018 . On November 26, 2013, we issued US$1 billion aggregate principal amount of 2.375% senior notes due November 26, 2018. These notes are guaranteed by the Guarantors. The indenture governing these notes imposes, among others, certain conditions upon a consolidation or merger by us and restricts the incurrence of liens and the entering into sale and leaseback transactions by us and our significant subsidiaries.

3.875% Notes due 2023 . On November 26, 2013, we issued US$750 million aggregate principal amount of 3.875% senior notes due November 26, 2023. On January 21, 2014, we issued US$150 million aggregate principal amount of additional notes under this series. These notes are guaranteed by the Guarantors. The indenture governing these notes imposes, among others, certain conditions upon a consolidation or merger by us and restricts the incurrence of liens and the entering into sale and leaseback transactions by us and our significant subsidiaries.

5.250% Notes due 2043 . On November 26, 2013, we issued US$400 million aggregate principal amount of 5.250% senior notes due November 26, 2043. On January 21, 2014, we issued US$200 million aggregate principal amount of additional notes under this series. These notes are guaranteed by the Guarantors. The indenture governing these notes imposes, among others, certain conditions upon a consolidation or merger by us and restricts the incurrence of liens and the entering into sale and leaseback transactions by us and our significant subsidiaries.

4.625% Notes due 2020 . On February 5, 2010, we issued US$500 million aggregate principal amount of 4.625% senior notes due February 15, 2020. These notes are guaranteed by the Guarantors. The indenture governing these notes imposes, among others, certain conditions upon a consolidation or merger by us and restricts the incurrence of liens and the entering into sale and leaseback transactions by us and our significant subsidiaries.

 

57


Table of Contents

Bank Loans . As of December 31, 2015, we had a number of bank loans in Colombian pesos, Brazilian reais, and Argentine pesos, with an aggregate principal amount of Ps.2,452 million.

In December 2015, we prepaid in full our outstanding bank debt denominated in U.S. dollars for an amount of US$450 million (nominal amount).

We are in compliance with all of our restrictive covenants as of the date of this annual report. A significant and prolonged deterioration in our consolidated results could cause us to cease to be in compliance under certain indebtedness in the future. We can provide no assurances that we will be able to incur indebtedness or to refinance existing indebtedness on similar terms in the future.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any material off-balance sheet arrangements.

Contingencies

We are subject to various claims and contingencies related to tax, labor and other legal proceedings. Due to their nature, such legal proceedings involve inherent uncertainties including, but not limited to, court rulings, negotiations between affected parties and governmental actions.

We have various losses related to tax, labor and other legal proceedings. We periodically assess the probability of loss for such contingencies and accrue a provision and/or disclose the relevant circumstances, as appropriate. If the potential loss of any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, we accrue a provision for the estimated loss. See Note 24 to our consolidated financial statements. We use outside legal counsel for certain complex legal proceedings. The following table presents the nature and amount of the loss contingencies recorded as of December 31, 2015:

 

     Long-Term  

Tax, primarily indirect taxes

     Ps. 1,658   

Labor

     1,340   

Other legal

     319   
  

 

 

 

Total

     Ps. 3,317   

In recent years, our Mexican subsidiaries have been required to submit certain information to relevant authorities regarding alleged monopolistic practices. See “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings—Mexico—Antitrust Matters.” Such proceedings are a normal occurrence in the beverage industry and we do not expect any significant liability to arise from these contingencies.

As is customary in Brazil, we have been required by the relevant authorities to collateralize tax contingencies currently in litigation amounting to Ps.3,569 million, Ps.3,026 million and Ps.2,248 million as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, by pledging fixed assets, or providing bank guarantees.

Capital Expenditures

The following table sets forth our capital expenditures, including investment in property, plant and equipment, deferred charges and other investments for the periods indicated on a consolidated basis and by consolidated reporting segment:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015      2014      2013  
     (in millions of Mexican pesos)  

Capital expenditures, net (1)

     11,484         11,313         11,703   

 

(1) Includes acquisitions and disposals of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and other long-lived assets.

 

58


Table of Contents
     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015      2014      2013  
     (in millions of Mexican pesos)  

Mexico and Central America (1)

     4,672         3,952         5,287   

South America (excluding Venezuela) (2)

     5,686         6,198         4,447   

Venezuela

     1,126         1,163         1,969   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     11,484         11,313         11,703   

 

(1) Includes Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama.

 

(2) Includes Colombia, Brazil and Argentina.

In 2015, we focused our capital expenditures on investments in (i) increasing production capacity; (ii) placing coolers with retailers; (iii) returnable bottles and cases; (iv) improving the efficiency of our distribution infrastructure; and (v) information technology. Through these measures, we continuously seek to improve our profit margins and overall profitability.

In 2014 and 2013, we focused part of our capital expenditures in the construction of a production plant in Minas Gerais, Brazil, which was completed and began operations in November 2014, and the construction of a production plant in Tocancipa, Colombia, which was completed and began operations in February 2015. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—Description of Property, Plant and Equipment.”

We have budgeted approximately US$690 million for our capital expenditures in 2016. Our capital expenditures in 2016 are primarily intended for:

 

   

investments in production capacity;

 

   

market investments;

 

   

returnable bottles and cases;

 

   

improvements throughout our distribution network; and

 

   

investments in information technology.

We estimate that of our projected capital expenditures for 2016, approximately 36.0% will be for our Mexican territories and the remaining will be for our non-Mexican territories. We believe that internally generated funds will be sufficient to meet our budgeted capital expenditure for 2016. Our capital expenditure plan for 2016 may change based on market and other conditions, our results and financial resources.

Historically, The Coca-Cola Company has contributed resources in addition to our own capital expenditures. We generally use these contributions for initiatives that promote volume growth of Coca-Cola trademark beverages, including the placement of coolers with retailers. Such payments may result in a reduction in our selling expenses line. Contributions by The Coca-Cola Company are made on a discretionary basis. Although we believe that The Coca-Cola Company will make additional contributions in the future to assist our capital expenditure program based on past practice and the benefits to The Coca-Cola Company as owner of the Coca-Cola brands from investments that support the strength of the brands in our territories, we can give no assurance that any such contributions will be made.

 

59


Table of Contents

Hedging Activities

We hold or enter into derivative instruments to hedge our exposure to market risks related to changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity price risk. See “Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.”

The following table provides a summary of the fair value of derivative instruments as of December 31, 2015. The fair market value is estimated using market prices that would apply to terminate the contracts at the end of the period and are confirmed by external sources, which generally are also our counterparties to the relevant contracts.

 

     Fair Value As Of December 31, 2015  
     Maturity
less than
1 year
    Maturity 1 –  3
years
     Maturity 4 –  5
years
     Maturity in
excess of  5

years
     Total fair
value
 
     (in millions of Mexican pesos)  

Cross Currency Swaps

             

Mexican pesos to U.S. dollars

     —          1,899         —           —           1,899   

Brazilian reais to U.S. dollars

     —          317         —           —           317   

Forwards

             

U.S. dollars to Mexican pesos

     104        —           —           —           104   

U.S. dollars to Brazilian reais

     112        —           —           —           112   

U.S. dollars to Colombian pesos

     41        —           —           —           41   

U.S. dollars to Argentine pesos

     126        —           —           —           126   

Options

             

U.S. dollars to Mexican pesos

     57        —           —           —           57   

U.S. dollars to Colombian pesos

     8        —           —           —           8   

Commodity Hedge Contracts

             

Sugar

     (190     —           —           —           (190

Aluminum

     (84     —           —           —           (84

In addition, our call option to acquire the remaining 49.0% stake in CCFPI and our put option to sell our ownership in CCFPI to The Coca-Cola Company are treated as derivative instruments for accounting purposes. See Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements for more information.

 

60


Table of Contents
Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees

Directors

Management of our business is vested in our board of directors and in our chief executive officer. In accordance with our bylaws and Article 24 of the Mexican Securities Market Law, our board of directors will consist of no more than 21 directors and their respective alternates, elected at the annual ordinary shareholders meeting for renewable terms of one year. Our board of directors currently consists of 21 directors and 19 alternate directors; 13 directors and their respective alternate directors are elected by holders of the Series A shares voting as a class; five directors and their respective alternate directors are elected by holders of the Series D shares voting as a class; and up to three directors and their respective alternate directors are elected by holders of the Series L shares voting as a class. Directors may only be elected by a majority of shareholders of the appropriate series, voting as a class.

In accordance with our bylaws and Article 24 of the Mexican Securities Market Law, at least 25.0% of the members of our board of directors must be independent (as defined by the Mexican Securities Market Law). The board of directors may designate interim directors in the case that a director is absent or an elected director and corresponding alternate are unable to serve; the interim directors serve until the next shareholders meeting, at which the shareholders elect a replacement.

Our bylaws provide that when Series B shares are issued, which has not yet occurred, for every 10.0% of issued and paid shares of capital stock of our company held by shareholders of such Series B, either individually or as a group, such shareholders shall have the right to designate and revoke one director and the corresponding alternate, pursuant to Article 50 of the Mexican Securities Market Law.

Our bylaws provide that the board of directors shall meet at least four times a year. Since our major shareholders amended their Shareholders Agreement in February 2010, our bylaws were modified accordingly establishing that actions by the board of directors must be approved by at least a majority of the directors present and voting, except under certain limited circumstances which must include the favorable vote of at least two directors elected by the Series D shares. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—The Shareholders Agreement.” The chairman of the board of directors, the chairman of our audit or Corporate Practices Committee, or at least 25.0% of our directors may call a board of directors’ meeting to include matters in the meeting agenda.

At our general ordinary shareholders meeting held on March 7, 2016, the following directors were appointed or confirmed: 13 directors and their respective alternates as applicable, were appointed or confirmed by holders of Series A shares, five directors and their respective alternates as applicable, were appointed or confirmed by holders of Series D shares and three directors and their respective alternates as applicable, were appointed or confirmed by holders of Series L shares. Our board of directors is currently comprised of 21 members.

See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions” for information on relationships with certain directors and senior management.

As of the date of this annual report, our board of directors had the following members:

Series A Directors

 

José Antonio

Fernández Carbajal

Chairman

   Born:    February 1954
   First elected:    1993, as director; 2001 as chairman.
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of FEMSA.
   Other directorships:    Chairman of the board of directors of Fundación FEMSA and Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, or ITESM. Chairman Emeritus of US Mexico Foundation. Member of the board of directors of Heineken Holding, N.V., and vice-chairman of the supervisory board, chairman of the America’s committee and member of the preparatory committee and selection and appointment committee of Heineken, N.V. Member of the board of directors of Industrias Peñoles, S.A.B. de C.V., Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. de C.V., or Televisa, and Co-Chairman of the advisory board of Woodrow Wilson Center, Mexico Institute.

 

61


Table of Contents
   Business experience:    Joined the strategic planning department of FEMSA in 1988, after which he held managerial positions at FEMSA Cerveza’s commercial division and OXXO. He was appointed Deputy Chief Executive Officer of FEMSA in 1991 and Chief Executive Officer in 1995, a position he held until December 31, 2013. As of January 1, 2014, he was appointed Executive Chairman of the board of directors of FEMSA.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Industrial Engineering and a Master in Business Administration, or MBA, from ITESM.
   Alternate director:    Bárbara Garza Lagüera Gonda (2)

Carlos Salazar

Lomelín

Director

  

Born:

  

April 1951

   First elected:    2000
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Chief Executive Officer of FEMSA.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of FEMSA, Grupo Financiero BBVA Bancomer, S.A. de C.V., or Grupo BBVA Bancomer, and Fundación FEMSA. Member of the advisory board of Premio Eugenio Garza Sada, Centro Internacional de Negocios Monterrey A.C. (CINTERMEX), Asociación Promotora de Exposiciones, A.C. and the ITESM’s EGADE Business School. Executive Chairman of the strategic planning board of the State of Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
   Business experience:    In addition, he has held managerial positions in several subsidiaries of FEMSA, including Grafo Regia, S.A. de C.V. and Plásticos Técnicos Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V., served as Chief Executive Officer of FEMSA Cerveza, where he also held various management positions in the Commercial Planning and Export divisions. In 2000 he was appointed our Chief Executive Officer, a position he held until December 31, 2013. As of January 1, 2014, he was appointed Chief Executive Officer of FEMSA.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Economics from ITESM, and performed postgraduate studies in Business Administration at ITESM and Economic Development in Italy.
   Alternate director:    Max Michel González

Miguel Eduardo Padilla Silva

Director

   Born:    January 1955
   First elected:    2016
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Chief Financial and Corporate Officer of FEMSA.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of Grupo Lamosa, S.A.B. de C.V., Club Industrial, A.C., Universidad Tec Milenio and Coppel, S.A. de C.V.
   Business experience:    He held the position of Chief Executive Officer of FEMSA Comercio from 2004 to 2016. Also, he held the positions of Planning and Control Officer of FEMSA from 1997 to 1999 and Chief Executive Officer of the Strategic Procurement Business Division of FEMSA from 2000 to 2003. He had a 20-year career in Alfa, S.A.B. de C.V., or Alfa, and held a position in Terza, S.A. de C.V. as Chief Executive Officer.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Mechanical Engineering from ITESM, a MBA from Cornell University and executive management studies at Instituto Panamericano de Alta Dirección de Empresa, or IPADE.
   Alternate director:    Paulina Garza Lagüera Gonda (2)

 

62


Table of Contents

Javier Gerardo

Astaburuaga Sanjines

Director

   Born:    July 1959
   First elected:    2006
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Vice-President of Corporate Development of FEMSA.
   Business experience:    Joined FEMSA as a financial information analyst and later acquired experience in corporate development, administration and finance, held various senior positions at FEMSA Cerveza between 1993 and 2001, including Chief Financial Officer and for two years he served as FEMSA Cerveza’s Director of Sales for the north region of Mexico, prior to his current position and until 2003, when he was appointed FEMSA Cerveza’s Co-Chief Executive Officer. He held the position of Chief Financial and Corporate Officer of FEMSA from 2006 to 2015.
   Other directorships:    Member of the supervisory board and audit committee of Heineken N.V.
   Education:    Holds a degree in accounting from ITESM and is licensed as a Certified Public Accountant, or CPA.
   Alternate director:    Francisco José Calderón Rojas

Federico Reyes

García

Director

   Born:    September 1945
   First elected:    1992
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Independent Consultant.
   Business experience:    At FEMSA, he held the position of Executive Vice-President of Corporate Development from 1992 to 1993, Chief Financial Officer from 1999 to 2006, and Corporate Development Officer until 2015.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of Fundación FEMSA and Tec Salud.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Business and Finance from ITESM.
   Alternate director:    Alejandro Bailleres Gual

John Anthony Santa Maria Otazua

Director

   Born:    August 1957
   First elected:    2014
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Our Chief Executive Officer.
   Business experience:    Has served as our Strategic Planning and Business Development Officer and Chief Operating Officer of our Mexican operations. Has served as Strategic Planning and Commercial Development Officer and Chief Operating Officer of our South America division. As Strategic Planning Officer, he led the integration of the Panamco acquisition with our operations. He also has experience in several areas of our company, namely development of new products and mergers and acquisitions. Has experience with different bottler companies in Mexico in areas such as Strategic Planning and General Management.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors and the commercial committee of Gentera, S.A.B. de C.V., or Gentera.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Business Administration and a MBA with a major in Finance from Southern Methodist University.
   Alternate director:    Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez

Mariana Garza

Lagüera Gonda (2)

Director

   Born:    April 1970
   First elected:    2009
   Term expires:    2017
   Business experience:    Private Investor
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of FEMSA, ITESM, Museo de Historia Mexicana, Inmobiliaria Valmex, S.A. de C.V., Inversiones Bursátiles Industriales, S.A. de C.V., Desarrollo Inmobiliario la Sierrita, S.A. de C.V., Refrigeración York, S.A. de C.V., Peñitas, S.A. de C.V., Controladora Pentafem, S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Monte Serena, S.A. de C.V.

 

63


Table of Contents
   Education:    Holds a degree in Industrial Engineering from ITESM and a Master’s degree in International Administration from the Thunderbird American Graduate School of International Administration.
   Alternate director:    Alfonso Garza Garza (1)

Ricardo Guajardo Touché

Director

   Born:    May 1948
   First elected:    1993
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Chairman of the board of directors of Solfi, S.A. de C.V.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of FEMSA, Grupo Valores Operativos Monterrey, S.A.P.I. de C.V., El Puerto de Liverpool, S.A.B. de C.V., Alfa, Grupo BBVA Bancomer, BBVA Bancomer, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, or BBVA Bancomer, Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Bimbo, S.A.B. de C.V., or Bimbo, Coppel, S.A. de C.V., ITESM and Vitro, S.A.B. de C.V.
   Business experience:    Has held senior executive positions at FEMSA, Grupo AXA, S.A. de C.V. and Valores de Monterrey, S.A.B. de C.V.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Electrical Engineering from ITESM and the University of Wisconsin and a Master’s degree from the University of California at Berkeley.
  

Alternate director:

  

Daniel Alberto Rodríguez Cofré

Alfonso González Migoya

Independent Director

   Born:    January 1945
   First elected:    2006
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Chairman of the board of directors of Controladora Vuela Compañía de Aviación, S.A.B. de C.V. (Volaris), and managing partner of Acumen Empresarial, S.A. de C.V.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of Nemak, S.A.B. de C.V., Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V., Banregio Grupo Financiero, S.A., Cuprum, S.A. de C.V., Berel, S.A. de C.V., Servicios Corporativos Javer, S.A.B. de C.V. and ITESM.
   Business experience:    Served as Corporate Director of Alfa from 1995 to 2005 and as Chairman of the board of directors and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Industrial Saltillo, S.A.B. de C.V. from 2009 to 2014.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Mechanical Engineering from ITESM and a MBA from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business.
   Alternate director:    Ernesto Cruz Velázquez de León

Enrique F. Senior Hernández

Independent Director

   Born:    August 1943
   First elected:    2004
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Managing Director of Allen & Company, LLC.
   Other directorship:    Member of the board of directors of Televisa, Cinemark USA, Inc. and Univision Communications, Inc.
   Business experience:    Among other clients, has provided financial advisory services to FEMSA and Coca-Cola FEMSA.
   Education:    Holds a Bachelor’s degree from Yale University, a law degree and Honorary Law Doctorate from Emerson College and a MBA from Harvard University Business School.
   Alternate director:    Herbert Allen III

 

64


Table of Contents

Alfredo Livas Cantú

Independent Director

   Born:    July 1951
   First elected:    2014
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    President of Praxis Financiera, S.C.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of FEMSA, Grupo Senda Autotransporte, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Acosta Verde, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Industrial Saltillo, S.A.B. de C.V., and Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V., and member of the governance committee of Grupo Proeza, S.A.P.I. de C.V.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Economics from Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León and a MBA and Master’s in Economics from the University of Texas.
   Alternate director:    Jaime El Koury

Daniel Servitje Montull

Independent Director

   Born:    April 1959
   First elected:    1998
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of Bimbo.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of Grupo Financiero Banamex, S.A. de C.V., Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad, A.C., The Consumer Goods Forum, Latin America Conservation Council (The Nature Conservancy) and Stanford GSB Advisory Council, and Chairman of the board of directors of Corporación Aura Solar, S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Servicios Comerciales de Energía, S.A. de C.V.
   Business experience:    Served as Vice-President of Bimbo.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Business Administration from the Universidad Iberoamericana in Mexico and a MBA from the Stanford University Graduate School of Business.
   Alternate director:    Sergio Deschamps Ebergenyi

José Luis Cutrale

Director

   Born:    September 1946
   First elected:    2004
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Chief Executive Officer of Sucocítrico Cutrale, Ltda.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of Cutrale North America, Inc., Cutrale Citrus Juice USA, Inc., Citrus Products, Inc. and Chiquita Brands International
   Business experience:    Founding partner of Sucocítrico Cutrale and member of the Brazilian American Chamber of Commerce.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Business Administration.
   Alternate director:    José Luis Cutrale, Jr.
Series D Directors      

José Octavio Reyes Lagunes

Director

   Born:    March 1952
   First elected:    2016
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Vice Chairman of The Coca-Cola Export Corporation.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of MasterCard Worldwide, Coca-Cola Hellenic Bottling Company and Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.
   Business experience:    He served as President of the Latin American Group of The Coca-Cola Company from 2002 to 2012. Prior to that, he began his career with The Coca-Cola Company in 1980 as Manager of Strategic Planning at Coca-Cola de México, was appointed Manager of the Sprite and Diet Coke brands at the corporate headquarters in Atlanta in 1987, became Marketing Director for the Brazil Division in 1990, was named Marketing and Operations Vice President for the Mexico Division and became President for the Mexico Division in 1996.

 

65


Table of Contents
   Education:    Holds a degree in Chemical Engineering from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and a MBA from ITESM.
   Alternate director:    Robin Moore

Irial Finan

Director

   Born:    June 1957
   First elected:    2004
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Executive Vice-President and President of Bottling Investments.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of Coca-Cola HBC, Coca-Cola East Japan, The Coca-Cola Foundation, Supervisory Board for CCE AG (Germany), Smurfit Kappa Group and The American-Ireland Fund.
   Business experience:    He served as Chief Executive Officer of Coca-Cola Hellenic. Has experience in several Coca-Cola bottlers, mainly in Europe.
   Education:    Holds a Bachelor’s degree in Commerce from National University of Ireland and is an Associate of the Institute of Chartered Management Accountants.
   Alternate director:    Sunil Ghatnekar

Charles H. McTier

Independent Director

   Born:    January 1939
   First elected:    1998
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Retired
   Business experience:    Has been associated with the Robert W. Woodruff Foundation for over forty years, serving as its President from 1988-2006 and served as a trustee from 2006-2015. Served on the board of directors of nine U.S. Coca-Cola bottling companies in the 1970s and 1980s.
   Education:    Holds a Bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Emory University.

Kathy Waller

Director

   Born:    May 1958
   First elected:    2015
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of The Coca-Cola Company.
   Other directorships:    Serves on the board of trustees of the University of Rochester, the advisory board of Catalyst, Inc. and the board of directors of Delta Airlines and Monster Beverage Corporation.
   Business experience:    Joined The Coca-Cola Company in 1987 as a Senior Accountant in the Accounting Research Department and assumed roles of increasing responsibility, including Principal Accountant for the Northeast Europe/Africa Group, Chief of Internal Audit as well as Comptroller, and Marketing Comptroller for the McDonald’s Group.
   Education:    Holds a Bachelor’s degree and a MBA from the University of Rochester and is licensed as a CPA.
   Alternate director:    Gloria Bowden

Eva María Garza Lagüera Gonda (3)

Director

   Born:    April 1958
   First elected:    2015
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Private Investor.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of ITESM, Premio Eugenio Garza Sada, Inmobiliaria Valmex, S.A. de C.V., Inversiones Bursátiles Industriales, S.A. de C.V., Desarrollo Inmobiliario la Sierrita, S.A. de C.V., Refrigeración York, S.A. de C.V., Peñitas, S.A. de C.V. and Controladora Pentafem, S.A.P.I. de C.V. and alternate member of the board of directors of FEMSA. Co-Founder and former President of Alternativas Pacíficas A.C.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Communications Science from ITESM.
   Alternate director:    Luis Rubio Freidberg

 

66


Table of Contents
Series L Directors      

Robert A. Fleishman Cahn

Independent Director

   Born:    February 1962
   First elected:    2012
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Tampico, S.A.P.I. de C.V.
   Other directorships:    Secretary of the board of directors of Grupo Tampico, S.A.P.I. de C.V. and its subsidiaries, and member of the regional board of Banco Nacional de México, S.A. and BBVA Bancomer.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Business Administration from the University of Texas and an Executive Development Program from Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
   Alternate:    Herman Harris Fleishman Cahn

José Manuel Canal Hernando

Independent Director

   Born:    February 1940
   First elected:    2003
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Independent Consultant.
   Business experience:    Former managing partner at Arthur Andersen (Ruiz, Urquiza y Cía, S.C.) from 1981 to 1999, acted as statutory examiner of FEMSA from 1984 to 2002, founder and chairman of the Mexican Accounting Standards Board.
   Other directorships:    Member of the board of directors of FEMSA, Grupo Kuo, S.A.B. de C.V., Grupo Industrial Saltillo, S.A.B. de C.V. and Estafeta Mexicana, S.A. de C.V., member of the risk committee of Gentera, and statutory examiner of Grupo BBVA Bancomer.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Accounting from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México and is licensed as a CPA.
   Alternate:    Luis A. Nicolau Gutiérrez

Francisco Zambrano Rodríguez

Independent Director

   Born:    January 1953
   First elected:    2003
   Term expires:    2017
   Principal occupation:    Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Verterrak, S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Vice Chairman of the board of directors of Desarrollo Inmobiliario y de Valores, S.A. de C.V.
   Other directorships:    Member of the supervisory board of ITESM.
   Business experience:    Has extensive experience in investment banking and private investment services in Mexico.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Chemical Engineering from ITESM and a MBA from the University of Texas.
   Alternate director:    Karl Frei Buechi

 

(1) Cousin of Eva María Garza Lagüera Gonda, Paulina Garza Lagüera Gonda, Mariana Garza Lagüera Gonda and Bárbara Garza Lagüera Gonda.

 

(2) Sister of Eva Maria Garza Lagüera Gonda and sister-in-law of José Antonio Fernández Carbajal.

 

(3) Wife of José Antonio Fernández Carbajal.

The secretary of the board of directors is Carlos Eduardo Aldrete Ancira and the alternate secretary of the board of directors is Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz, our general counsel.

In June 2004, a group of Brazilian investors, among them José Luis Cutrale, a member of our board of directors, made a capital contribution equivalent to approximately US$50 million to our Brazilian operations in exchange for approximately 16.9% equity stake in these operations. We have entered into an agreement with Mr. Cutrale pursuant to which he was invited to serve as a director of our company. The agreement also provides for a right of first offer on transfers by the investors, tag-along and drag-along rights and certain rights upon a change of control of either party, with respect to our Brazilian operations.

 

67


Table of Contents

Pursuant to a shareholders’ agreement dated October 10, 2011, by and among Mr. Herman Harris Fleishman Cahn, Mr. Robert Alan Fleishman Cahn and FEMSA, Mr. Herman Harris Fleishman Cahn and Mr. Robert Alan Fleishman Cahn have been elected as director and alternate director of our board of directors beginning in October 2011 for six consecutive one-year terms. Mr. Herman Harris Fleishman Cahn and Mr. Robert Alan Fleishman Cahn alternate the roles of director and alternate director each year.

Executive Officers

The following are the principal executive officers of our company:

 

John Anthony Santa

Maria Otazua

Chief Executive Officer

   Born:    August 1957
   Joined:    1995
   Appointed to current position:    2014
   Business experience with us:    Has served as our Strategic Planning and Business Development Officer and Chief Operating Officer of our Mexican operations. Has served as Strategic Planning and Commercial Development Officer and Chief Operating Officer of our South America division. As Strategic Planning Officer, he led the integration of the Panamco acquisition with our operations. He also has experience in several areas of our company, namely development of new products and mergers and acquisitions.
   Other business experience:    Has experience with different bottler companies in Mexico in areas such as Strategic Planning and General Management.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Business Administration and a MBA with a major in Finance from Southern Methodist University.

Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez

Chief Financial Officer

   Born:    August 1956
   Joined:    1981
   Appointed to current position:    1993
   Other business experience:    At FEMSA, was in charge of the International Financing department, served as Manager of Financial Planning and Manager of International Financing, Chief Officer of Strategic Planning and Chief Officer of Business Development and headed the Corporate Development department.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Chemical Engineering from ITESM and a MBA from the Wharton School of Business.

Tanya Cecilia Avellan Pinoargote

Planning, Information Technology and

Commercial Officer

   Born:    May 1966
   Joined:    2002
   Appointed to current position:    2014
   Business experience with us:    Served as Strategic Planning Officer at FEMSA, Chief Operations Officer at our Central America division and Commercial Planning and Strategic Development Officer.
   Other business experience:    Has undertaken responsibilities in different multinational companies with vast experience in mass consumer goods.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Communications from Universidad Politécnica del Ecuador and a MBA specialized in marketing from INCAE Business School.

Raymundo Yutani Vela

Human Resources Officer

   Born:    June 1958
   Joined:    1999
   Appointed to current position:    2014
   Business experience with us:    Human Resources Officer at FEMSA Comercio from 1999 to 2014.
   Other business experience:    Worked as Human Resources Officer at Banco Santander-Serfin from 1995 to 1999.
   Education:    Holds a Bachelor’s degree in Accounting and a Master’s degree in Human Resources at Universidad Regiomontana and is licensed as a CPA.

 

68


Table of Contents

Ernesto Javier Silva Almaguer

Chief Operating Officer—Mexico

   Born:    March 1953
   Joined:    1972
   Appointed to current position:   

2011

   Business experience with us:    Has served as Strategic Planning Officer, Chief Operating Officer in Argentina, Mercosur, Mexico and Central America.
   Other business experience:    Has worked as General Director of former packaging subsidiaries of FEMSA, served as Vice-President of International Sales at FEMSA Empaques and Manager of FEMSA’s Corporate Planning and held several positions at Alfa.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Mechanical and Administrative Engineering from Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León and a MBA from The University of Texas at Austin.

Rafael Alberto Suárez Olaguibel

Chief Operating Officer—Latin America

   Born:    April 1960
   Joined:    1986
   Appointed to current position:    2015
   Business experience with us:    Has served as Chief Operating Officer Latincentro Division, Commercial Planning and Strategic Development Officer, Chief Operating Officer of Mexico, Chief Operating Officer of Argentina, Distribution and Sales Director of Valley of Mexico and Marketing Director of Valley of Mexico.
   Other business experience:    Has worked as Franchises Manager and in other positions at The Coca-Cola Company in Mexico.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Economics and a MBA from ITESM.

José Ramón de Jesús Martínez Alonso

Chief Operating Officer—Brazil

   Born:    July 1961
   Joined:    2012
   Appointed to current position:    2014
   Business experience with us:    Served as Operational Planning Officer, Corporate Affairs Director for Mexico and Central America and Strategic Planning Director of our South America division.
   Other business experience:    Operations vice-president of Panamco from 1994 to 1999, Chief Operating Officer of Panamco from 1999 to 2002 and President of the National Association of Coca-Cola Bottlers in Mexico from 2005 to 2012.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Chemical Engineering from La Salle University and a MBA from IPADE.

Francisco Suárez Hernández

Corporate Affairs Officer

   Born:    November 1971
   Joined:    1997
   Appointed to current position:    2014
   Business experience with us:    He served as the Chief of Staff of the chairman of FEMSA’s board of directors and CEO of FEMSA. He also held positions in FEMSA’s packaging division in the commercial area in Mexico City and manufacturing plants in Baja California and other states in Mexico. He was named Sustainability Officer of FEMSA in February 2011.
   Education:    Holds a bachelor’s degree in Accounting from the Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, a MBA and a Doctorate degree in Business Administration at CETYS Universidad in Baja California.

 

69


Table of Contents

Alejandro Javier Duncan Ancira

Supply Chain and Engineering Officer

   Born:    May 1957
   Joined:    1980
   Appointed to current position:    2015
   Business experience with us:    Infrastructure Planning Director of Mexico and our Technical Officer. Logistics, Manufacturing Officer in Argentina and Plant Manager in Mexico.
   Other business experience:    Has undertaken responsibilities in different areas such as technology, production, logistics, engineering and project management in manufacturing companies.
   Education:    Holds a degree in Mechanical-Electrical Engineering from ITESM and a MBA from Universidad de Monterrey.

Eduardo Guillermo Hernández Peña

New Businesses Officer

   Born:    October 1965
   Joined:    2015
   Appointed to current position:    2015
   Other business experience:    At Empresas Polar he held several positions in the beer, wine and food business. Since 2010, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Gloria, S.A.
   Education:    Holds a bachelor’s degree in Business Administration from Universidad Metropolitana in Venezuela, a degree in Marketing from Harvard University and a MBA from Northwestern University.

 

(1) See “—Directors.”

Compensation of Directors and Officers

For the year ended December 31, 2015, the aggregate compensation of all of our executive officers paid or accrued for services in all capacities was approximately Ps.225 million. The aggregate compensation amount includes approximately Ps.117 million of cash bonus awards and bonuses paid to certain of our executive officers pursuant to our incentive plan for stock purchases. See “—EVA-Based Bonus Program.”

The aggregate compensation for directors during 2015 was Ps.22 million. For each meeting attended we paid US$13,000 to each director with foreign residence and US$9,000 to all other directors with residence in Mexico in 2015.

We paid US$5,000 to each of the members of the Audit, Finance and Planning and the Corporate Practices Committees per each meeting attended, and we paid US$6,500 to the chairman of the Audit Committee per meeting attended.

Our senior management and executive officers participate in our benefit plans in the same terms as our other employees. Members of our board of directors do not participate in our benefit plans. As of December 31, 2015, amounts accrued for all employees under our pension and retirement plans were Ps.2,687 million, of which Ps.864 million are already funded.

EVA-Based Bonus Program

Our bonus program for executives is based on complying with certain goals established annually by management, which include quantitative and qualitative objectives as well as the completion of special projects.

The quantitative objectives represent approximately 50.0% of the bonus and are based on the Economic Value Added, or EVA, methodology. These quantitative objectives, established for the executives at each entity, are based on a combination of the EVA generated per entity and by our company and the EVA generated by our parent company, FEMSA. The qualitative goals and special projects represent the remaining 50.0% of the annual bonus and are based on the critical success factors established at the beginning of the year for each executive.

The bonus amount is determined based on each eligible participant’s level of responsibility and based on the EVA generated by the applicable business unit the employee works for. This formula is calculated considering the level of responsibility within the organization, the employees’ evaluation and competitive compensation in the market.

 

70


Table of Contents

The incentive plan target is expressed in months of salary and the final amount payable is computed based on a percentage of compliance with the goals established every year. The bonuses are recorded as a part of the income statement and are paid in cash the following year. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the bonus expense recorded amounted to Ps.549 million, Ps.523 million and Ps.533 million, respectively.

Share-based payment bonus plan. We have a stock incentive plan for the benefit of our executive officers. This plan uses as its main evaluation metric the EVA methodology. Under the EVA stock incentive plan, eligible executive officers are entitled to receive a special annual bonus (fixed amount), to purchase FEMSA and Coca-Cola FEMSA shares, based on the executive’s responsibility in the organization, their business’s EVA result and their individual performance. Until 2015, the acquired shares were deposited in a trust, and the executives accessed them one year after they were vested, at 20.0% per year. Beginning on January 1, 2016, the executives may access their acquired shares ratably over a three-year period. Fifty percent of our annual executive bonus under our stock incentive plan is to be used to purchase FEMSA shares and the remaining 50.0% to purchase our company’s shares. As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, no stock options had been granted to our employees.

The special bonus is granted to eligible employees on an annual basis and after withholding applicable taxes. We contribute the individual employee’s special bonus in cash to the administrative trust (which is controlled and consolidated by FEMSA), which then uses the funds to purchase FEMSA and Coca-Cola FEMSA shares (as instructed by the Corporate Practices Committee), which are then allocated to such eligible employee.

We account for our share-based payment bonus plan as an equity-settled share-based payment transaction, since it is our parent company, FEMSA, who ultimately grants and settles any shares due to executives.

Share Ownership

As of April 8, 2016, several of our directors and alternate directors were trust participants under the Irrevocable Trust No. 463 established at Banco Invex, S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Invex Grupo Financiero, as trustee, which is the owner of approximately 74.9% of the voting stock of FEMSA, which in turn owns 47.9% of our outstanding capital stock. As a result of the voting trust’s internal procedures, the voting trust as a whole is deemed to have beneficial ownership with sole voting power of all the shares deposited in the voting trust, and each of the trust participants are deemed to have beneficial ownership with shared voting power over those same deposited shares. These directors and alternate directors are Alfonso Garza Garza, Paulina Garza Lagüera Gonda, Bárbara Garza Lagüera Gonda, Mariana Garza Lagüera Gonda and Eva María Garza Lagüera Gonda. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders.” None of our other directors, alternate directors or executive officers is the beneficial owner of more than 1% of any class of our capital stock. See Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements.

Board Practices

Our bylaws state that the board of directors will meet at least four times a year to discuss our operating results and progress in achieving strategic objectives. It is the practice of our board of directors to meet following the end of each quarter. Our board of directors can also hold extraordinary meetings. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Bylaws.”

Under our bylaws, directors serve one-year terms although they continue in office for up to 30 days until successors are appointed. If no successor is appointed during this period, the board of directors may appoint interim members, who will be ratified or substituted at the next shareholders meeting after such event occurs. None of the members of our board of directors or senior management of our subsidiaries has service agreements providing for benefits upon termination of employment.

Our board of directors is supported by committees, which are working groups approved at our annual shareholders meeting that analyze issues and provide recommendations to the board of directors regarding their respective areas of focus. The executive officers interact periodically with the committees to address management issues. The following are the three committees of the board of directors:

 

   

Finance and Planning Committee . The Finance and Planning Committee works with management to set our annual and long-term strategic and financial plans and monitors adherence to these plans. It is responsible for setting our optimal capital structure and recommends the appropriate level of borrowing as well as the issuance of securities. Financial risk management is another responsibility of the Finance and Planning Committee. Irial Finan is the chairman of the Finance and Planning Committee. The other members include: Federico Reyes García, Ricardo Guajardo Touché, Enrique F. Senior Hernández and Miguel Eduardo Padilla Silva. The secretary non-member of the Finance and Planning Committee is Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez, our Chief Financial Officer.

 

71


Table of Contents
   

Audit Committee . The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing the accuracy and integrity of quarterly and annual financial statements in accordance with accounting, internal control and auditing requirements. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent auditor, who reports directly to the Audit Committee; the internal auditing function also reports to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee has implemented procedures for receiving, retaining and addressing complaints regarding accounting, internal control and auditing matters, including the submission of confidential, anonymous complaints from employees regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. To carry out its duties, the Audit Committee may hire independent counsel and other advisors. As necessary, we compensate the independent auditor and any outside advisor hired by the Audit Committee and provide funding for ordinary administrative expenses incurred by the Audit Committee in the course of its duties. José Manuel Canal Hernando is the chairman of the Audit Committee and the “audit committee financial expert”. Pursuant to the Mexican Securities Market Law, the chairman of the Audit Committee is elected at our shareholders meeting. The other members are: Alfonso González Migoya, Charles H. McTier, Francisco Zambrano Rodríguez and Ernesto Cruz Velázquez de León. Each member of the Audit Committee is an independent director, as required by the Mexican Securities Market Law and applicable New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The secretary non-member of the Audit Committee is José González Ornelas, vice-president of FEMSA’s internal corporate control department.

 

   

Corporate Practices Committee . The Corporate Practices Committee, which consists exclusively of independent directors, is responsible for preventing or reducing the risk of performing operations that could damage the value of our company or that benefit a particular group of shareholders. The committee may call a shareholders meeting and include matters on the agenda for that meeting that it deems appropriate, approve policies on related party transactions, approve the compensation plan of the chief executive officer and relevant officers, and support our board of directors in the elaboration of related reports. The chairman of the Corporate Practices Committee is Daniel Servitje Montull. Pursuant to the Mexican Securities Market Law, the chairman of the Corporate Practices Committee is elected at our shareholders meeting. The other members include: Alfredo Livas Cantú, Karl Frei Buechi, Luis Rubio Freidberg and Luis A. Nicolau Gutiérrez. The secretary non-member of the Corporate Practices Committee is Raymundo Yutani Vela.

 

   

Advisory Board . The Advisory’s Board main role is to advise and propose initiatives to our board of directors through the Chief Executive Officer. This committee is mainly comprised of former shareholders of the various bottling businesses that merged with us, whose experience constitute an important contribution to our operations.

Employees

As of December 31, 2015, our headcount was as follows: 50,186 in Mexico and Central America, 26,190 in South America (excluding Venezuela) and 7,336 in Venezuela. In the headcount we include the employees of third party distributors. The table below sets forth headcount by category for the periods indicated:

 

     As of December 31,  
     2015      2014      2013  

Executives

     1,024         1,038         1,054   

Non-union

     24,479         24,502         24,955   

Union

     49,855         49,150         51,076   

Employees of third party distributors

     8,354         8,681         7,837   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     83,712         83,371         84,922   

As of December 31, 2015, approximately 56.0% of our employees, most of whom were employed in Mexico, were members of labor unions. We had 239 separate collective bargaining agreements with 133 labor unions. In general, we have a good relationship with the labor unions throughout our operations, except in Colombia, Venezuela and Guatemala, which are or have been the subjects of significant labor-related litigation. See “Item 8. Financial Information—Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information” and “Item 8. Financial Information—Legal Proceedings.” We believe we have appropriate reserves for these litigation proceedings and do not currently expect them to have a material adverse effect.

Insurance Policies

We maintain a number of different types of insurance policies for all employees. These policies mitigate the risk of having to pay death benefits in the event of an industrial accident. We maintain directors’ and officers’ insurance policies covering all directors and certain key executive officers for liabilities incurred in their capacities as directors and officers.

 

72


Table of Contents
Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions

MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

Our outstanding capital stock consists of three classes of securities: Series A shares held by FEMSA, Series D shares held by The Coca-Cola Company and Series L shares held by the public. The following table sets forth our major shareholders as of April 8, 2016:

 

Owner

   Outstanding
Capital  Stock
     Percentage
Ownership of
Outstanding
Capital Stock
    Percentage
of Voting
Rights
 

FEMSA (Series A shares) (1)

     992,078,519         47.9     63.0

The Coca-Cola Company (Series D Shares) (2)

     583,545,678         28.1     37.0

Public (Series L shares) (3)

     497,298,032         24.0     —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     2,072,922,229         100.0     100.0

 

(1) FEMSA owns these shares through its wholly owned subsidiary Compañía Internacional de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V. Approximately 74.9% of the voting stock of FEMSA is owned by the technical committee and trust participants under Irrevocable Trust No. 463 established at Banco Invex, S.A. Institución de Banca Múltiple, Invex Grupo Financiero, as Trustee. As a consequence of the voting trust’s internal procedures, the following trust participants are deemed to have beneficial ownership with shared voting power of the shares deposited in the voting trust: BBVA Bancomer, S.A., as Trustee under Trust No. F/25078-7 (controlled by the estate of Max Michel Suberville), J.P. Morgan Trust Company (New Zealand) Limited, as Trustee under a trust (controlled by Paulina Garza Lagüera Gonda), Bárbara Garza Lagüera Gonda, Mariana Garza Lagüera Gonda, Eva Maria Garza Lagüera Gonda, Eva Gonda Rivera, Consuelo Garza Lagüera de Garza, Alfonso Garza Garza, Patricio Garza Garza, Juan Carlos Garza Garza, Eduardo Garza Garza, Eugenio Garza Garza, Alberto Bailleres Gonzalez, Maria Teresa Gual Aspe de Bailleres, Inversiones Bursátiles Industriales, S.A. de C.V. (controlled by the Garza Lagüera family), Corbal, S.A. de C.V. (controlled by Alberto Bailleres González), Magdalena Michel de David, Alepage, S.A. (controlled by Consuelo Garza Lagüera de Garza), BBVA Bancomer, S.A. as Trustee under Trust No. F/29013-0 (controlled by the Calderón Rojas family), the estate of Max Michel Suberville, Max David Michel, Juan David Michel, Monique David de VanLathem, Renee Michel de Guichard, Magdalena Guichard Michel, Rene Guichard Michel, Miguel Guichard Michel, Graciano Guichard Michel, Juan Guichard Michel, Franca Servicios, S.A. de C.V. (controlled by the Calderón Rojas family), BBVA Bancomer, S.A., as Trustee under Trust No. F/29490-0 (controlled by Alberto, Susana and Cecilia Bailleres), BBVA Bancomer, S.A., as Trustee under Trust No. F/710004 (controlled by Magdalena Michel de David) and BBVA Bancomer, S.A., as Trustee under Trust No. F/700005 (controlled by Renee Michel de Guichard).

 

(2) The Coca-Cola Company indirectly owns these shares through its wholly owned subsidiaries, The Inmex Corporation and Dulux CBAI 2003 B.V.

 

(3) Holders of Series L shares are only entitled to vote in limited circumstances. See “Item 10. Additional Information—Bylaws.” Holders of ADSs are entitled, subject to certain exceptions, to instruct The Bank of New York Mellon, a depositary, as to the exercise of the limited voting rights pertaining to the Series L shares underlying their ADSs.

Our Series A shares, owned by FEMSA, are held in Mexico and our Series D shares, owned by The Coca-Cola Company, are held outside of Mexico.

As of December 31, 2015, there were 14,850,774 of our outstanding ADSs (each ADS represents 10 Series L shares), and 29.9% of our outstanding Series L shares were represented by ADSs. As of April 8, 2016, 30.22% of our outstanding Series L shares were represented by ADSs, held by 349 holders (including The Depositary Trust Company) with registered addresses outside of Mexico.

 

73


Table of Contents

The Shareholders Agreement

We operate pursuant to a shareholders agreement among two subsidiaries of FEMSA, The Coca-Cola Company and certain of its subsidiaries. This agreement, together with our bylaws, sets forth the basic rules pursuant to which we operate.

In February 2010, our main shareholders, FEMSA and The Coca-Cola Company, amended the shareholders agreement, and our bylaws were amended accordingly. The amendment mainly related to changes in the voting requirements for decisions on: (1) ordinary operations within an annual business plan and (2) appointment of the chief executive officer and all officers reporting to him, all of which now may be taken by the board of directors by simple majority voting. Also, the amendment provided that payment of dividends, up to an amount equivalent to 20.0% of the preceding years’ retained earnings, may be approved by a simple majority of the shareholders. Any decision on extraordinary matters, as they are defined by our bylaws and which include any new business acquisition, business combinations or any change in the existing line of business, among other things, shall require the approval of the majority of the members of the board of directors, with the vote of two of the members appointed by The Coca-Cola Company. Also, any decision related to such extraordinary matters or any payment of dividends above 20.0% of the preceding years’ retained earnings shall require the approval of a majority of Series A and Series D shares voting together as a single class.

Under our bylaws and shareholders agreement, our Series A shares and Series D shares are the only shares with full voting rights and, therefore, control actions by our shareholders.

The shareholders agreement also sets forth the principal shareholders’ understanding as to the effect of adverse actions of The Coca-Cola Company under the bottler agreements. Our bylaws and shareholders agreement provide that a majority of the directors appointed by the holders of Series A shares, upon making a reasonable, good faith determination that any action of The Coca-Cola Company under any bottler agreement between The Coca-Cola Company and our company or any of our subsidiaries is materially adverse to our business interests and that The Coca-Cola Company has failed to cure such action within 60 days of notice, may declare a “simple majority period,” as defined in our bylaws, at any time within 90 days after giving notice. During the simple majority period certain decisions, namely the approval of material changes in our business plans, the introduction of a new, or termination of an existing line of business, and related party transactions outside the ordinary course of business, to the extent the presence and approval of at least two Series D directors would otherwise be required, can be made by a simple majority vote of our entire board of directors, without requiring the presence or approval of any Series D director. A majority of the Series A directors may terminate a simple majority period but, once having done so, cannot declare another simple majority period for one year after the termination. If a simple majority period persists for one year or more, the provisions of the shareholders agreement for resolution of irreconcilable differences may be triggered, with the consequences outlined in the following paragraph.

In addition to the rights of first refusal provided for in our bylaws regarding proposed transfers of Series A shares or Series D shares, the shareholders agreement contemplates three circumstances under which one principal shareholder may purchase the interest of the other in our company: (1) a change in control in a principal shareholder, (2) the existence of irreconcilable differences between the principal shareholders or (3) the occurrence of certain specified events of default.

In the event that (1) one of the principal shareholders buys the other’s interest in our company in any of the circumstances described above or (2) the ownership of our shares of capital stock other than the Series L shares of the subsidiaries of The Coca-Cola Company or FEMSA is reduced below 20.0% and upon the request of the shareholder whose interest is not so reduced, the shareholders agreement requires that our bylaws be amended to eliminate all share transfer restrictions and all special-majority voting and quorum requirements, after which the shareholders agreement would terminate.

The shareholders agreement also contains provisions relating to the principal shareholders understanding as to our growth. It states that it is The Coca-Cola Company’s intention that we will be viewed as one of a small number of its “anchor” bottlers in Latin America. In particular, the parties agree that it is desirable that we expand by acquiring additional bottler territories in Mexico and other Latin American countries in the event any become available through horizontal growth. In addition, The Coca-Cola Company has agreed, subject to a number of conditions, that if it obtains ownership of a bottler territory that fits with our operations, it will give us the option to acquire such territory. The Coca-Cola Company has also agreed to support reasonable and sound modifications to our capital structure to support horizontal growth. The Coca-Cola Company’s agreement as to horizontal growth expires upon either the elimination of the super-majority voting requirements described above or The Coca-Cola Company’s election to terminate the agreement as a result of a default.

 

74


Table of Contents

The Coca-Cola Memorandum

In connection with the acquisition of Panamco in 2003, we established certain understandings primarily relating to operational and business issues with both The Coca-Cola Company and FEMSA that were memorialized in writing prior to completion of the acquisition. Although The Coca-Cola Memorandum has not been amended, we continue to develop our relationship with The Coca-Cola Company (i.e. through, inter alia , acquisitions and taking on new product categories), and we therefore believe that The Coca-Cola Memorandum should be interpreted in the context of subsequent events, some of which have been noted in the description below. The terms are as follows:

 

   

The shareholder arrangements between FEMSA and The Coca-Cola Company and certain of its subsidiaries will continue in place. On February 1, 2010, FEMSA amended its shareholders agreement with The Coca-Cola Company . See “—The Shareholders Agreement.”

 

   

FEMSA will continue to consolidate our financial results under Mexican financial reporting standards. (We have complied with Mexican law by transitioning to IFRS as of 2011 and FEMSA currently consolidates our financial results under IFRS).

 

   

The Coca-Cola Company and FEMSA will continue to discuss in good faith the possibility of implementing changes to our capital structure in the future.

 

   

There will be no changes in concentrate pricing or marketing support by The Coca-Cola Company up to May 2004. After such time, The Coca-Cola Company has complete discretion to implement any changes with respect to these matters, but any decision in this regard will be discussed with us and will take our operating condition into consideration.

 

   

The Coca-Cola Company may require the establishment of a different long-term strategy for Brazil. If, after taking into account our performance in Brazil, The Coca-Cola Company does not consider us to be part of this long-term strategic solution for Brazil, then we will sell our Brazilian franchise to The Coca-Cola Company or its designee at fair market value. Fair market value would be determined by independent investment bankers retained by each party at their own expense pursuant to specified procedures. We currently believe the likelihood of this term applying is remote.

 

   

FEMSA, The Coca-Cola Company and we will meet to discuss the optimal Latin American territorial configuration for the Coca-Cola bottler system. During these meetings, we will consider all possible combinations and any asset swap transactions that may arise from these discussions. In addition, we will entertain any potential combination as long as it is strategically sound and done at fair market value.

 

   

We would like to keep open strategic alternatives that relate to the integration of sparkling beverages and beer. The Coca-Cola Company, FEMSA and we would explore these alternatives on a market-by-market basis at the appropriate time.

 

   

The Coca-Cola Company agreed to sell to a subsidiary of FEMSA sufficient shares to permit FEMSA to beneficially own 51.0% of our outstanding capital stock (assuming that this subsidiary of FEMSA does not sell any shares and that there are no issuances of our stock other than as contemplated by the acquisition). As a result of this understanding, in November 2006, FEMSA acquired, through a subsidiary, 148,000,000 of our Series D shares from certain subsidiaries of The Coca-Cola Company, representing 9.4% of the total outstanding voting shares and 8.0% of our total outstanding equity, at a price of US$2.888 per share for an aggregate amount of US$427.4 million. Pursuant to our bylaws, the acquired shares were converted from Series D shares to Series A shares.

 

   

We may be entering some markets where significant infrastructure investment may be required. The Coca-Cola Company and FEMSA will conduct a joint study that will outline strategies for these markets, as well as the investment levels required to execute these strategies. Subsequently, it is intended that FEMSA and The Coca-Cola Company will reach an agreement on the level of funding to be provided by each of the partners. The parties intend that this allocation of funding responsibilities would not be overly burdensome for either partner.

 

   

We entered into a stand-by credit facility in December 2003 with The Coca-Cola Export Corporation, which expired in December 2006 and was never used.

 

75


Table of Contents

Cooperation Framework with The Coca-Cola Company

In September 2006, we reached a comprehensive cooperation framework with The Coca-Cola Company for a new stage of collaboration going forward. This new framework includes the main aspects of our relationship with The Coca-Cola Company and defines the terms for the new collaborative business model. The framework is structured around three main objectives, which have been implemented as outlined below:

 

   

Sustainable growth of sparkling beverages, still beverages and waters: Together with The Coca-Cola Company, we have defined a platform to jointly pursue incremental growth in the sparkling beverages category, as well as accelerated development of still beverages and water across Latin America. To this end, The Coca-Cola Company will provide a relevant portion of the funds derived from the concentrate increase for marketing support of the entire portfolio. In addition, the framework contemplates a new, all-encompassing business model for the development, organically and through acquisitions, of still beverages and water that further aligns our and The Coca-Cola Company’s objectives and should contribute to incremental long-term value creation for both companies. With this objective in mind, we have jointly acquired the Brisa bottled water business in Colombia, we have a joint venture for the Jugos del Valle products in Mexico and Brazil and we have certain agreements to develop the Crystal water business and the Matte Leão business in Brazil with other bottlers, and the business of Estrella Azul, a leading dairy and juice-based beverage company in Panama. During 2011 we entered into a joint venture to develop certain coffee products in our territories. In addition, during 2012, we acquired, through Jugos del Valle, an indirect participation in Santa Clara, a producer of milk and dairy products in Mexico.

 

   

Our horizontal growth: The framework includes The Coca-Cola Company’s endorsement of our aspiration to continue being a leading participant in the consolidation of the Coca-Cola system in Latin America, as well as our exploration of potential opportunities in other markets where our operating model and strong execution capabilities could be leveraged. For example, in 2008 we entered into a transaction with The Coca-Cola Company to acquire from it, REMIL, which was The Coca-Cola Company’s wholly owned bottling franchise in the majority of the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. On January 25, 2013 we closed the acquisition of 51.0% non-controlling majority stake of the outstanding shares of CCFPI from The Coca-Cola Company. From 2011 to 2013, we closed four mergers in Mexico and two acquisitions in Brazil. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—The Company—Corporate History.”

 

   

Long-term vision in relationship economics: We and The Coca-Cola Company understand each other’s business objectives and growth plans, and the 2006 framework provides a long-term perspective on the economics of our relationship. This will allow us and The Coca-Cola Company to focus on continuing to drive the business forward and generating profitable growth.

RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We believe that our transactions with related parties are on terms comparable to those that would result from arm’s length negotiations with unaffiliated parties and are reviewed and approved by our Corporate Practices Committee.

FEMSA

We regularly engage in transactions with FEMSA and its subsidiaries.

We sell our products to certain FEMSA subsidiaries, substantially all of which consists of our sales to a chain of convenience stores under the name OXXO. The aggregate amount of these sales to OXXO was Ps.3,749 million, Ps.3,414 million and Ps.3.078 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

We also purchase products from FEMSA and its subsidiaries. The aggregate amount of these purchases was Ps.7,720 million, Ps.7,368 million and Ps.5,200 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These amounts principally relate to raw materials, assets and services provided to us by FEMSA. In January 2008, we renewed our service agreement with another subsidiary of FEMSA, which provides for the continued provision of administrative services relating to insurance, legal and tax advice, relations with governmental authorities and certain administrative and internal auditing services that it has been providing since June 1993. In November 2000, we entered into a service agreement with a subsidiary of FEMSA for the transportation of finished products from our production facilities to our distribution centers within Mexico. In September 2010, FEMSA sold the Mundet brand in Mexico to The Coca-Cola Company through The Coca-Cola Company’s acquisition of 100.0% of the equity interest of Promotora de Marcas Nacionales, S.A. de C.V. We remain the licensee of the Mundet trademark under the license agreements with Promotora de Marcas Nacionales, S.A. de C.V. Both agreements are renewable for ten-year terms, subject to non-renewal by either party with notice to the other party. We recently expanded the territories covered by these agreements to certain of our operations outside of Mexico. We

 

76


Table of Contents

primarily purchase our glass bottles in Mexico from SIVESA, which until 2015 was a wholly owned subsidiary of Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma Holding, S.A. de C.V., formerly known as FEMSA Cerveza, currently a wholly owned subsidiary of the Heineken Group. The aggregate amount of our purchases from SIVESA amounted to Ps.216 million, Ps.278 million and Ps.266 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Finally, we continue to distribute and sell the Heineken beer portfolio, including Kaiser beer brands, in our Brazilian territories through the 20-year term, consistent with arrangements in place with Cervejarias Kaiser since 2006.

We also purchase products from Heineken and its subsidiaries. The aggregate amount of these purchases was Ps.6,944 million, Ps.6,288 million and Ps.3,734 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These amounts principally relate to raw materials and beer.

FEMSA is also a party to the understandings we have with The Coca-Cola Company relating to specified operational and business issues. A summary of these understandings is set forth under “—Major Shareholders—The Coca-Cola Memorandum.”

The Coca-Cola Company

We regularly engage in transactions with The Coca-Cola Company and its affiliates. We purchase all of our concentrate requirements for Coca-Cola trademark beverages from The Coca-Cola Company. Total expenses charged to us by The Coca-Cola Company for concentrates were approximately Ps.27,330 million, Ps.28,084 million and Ps.25,985 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Our company and The Coca-Cola Company pay and reimburse each other for marketing expenditures. The Coca-Cola Company also contributes to our coolers, bottles and case investment program. We received contributions to our marketing expenses of Ps.3,749 million, Ps.4,118 million and Ps.4,206 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

In December 2007 and May 2008, we sold most of our proprietary brands to The Coca-Cola Company. The proprietary brands are licensed back to us by The Coca-Cola Company pursuant to our bottler agreements. The December 2007 transaction was valued at US$48 million and the May 2008 transaction was valued at US$16 million. Revenues in prior years from the sale of proprietary brands were deferred and amortized against the related costs of future sales over the estimated sales period.

In Argentina, we purchase plastic preforms, as well as returnable plastic bottles, at competitive prices from Andina Empaques S.A., a local subsidiary of Embotelladora Andina S.A., a bottler of The Coca-Cola Company with operations in Argentina, Chile, Brazil and Paraguay in which The Coca-Cola Company has a substantial interest, and other local suppliers. We also acquire plastic preforms from Alpla Avellaneda S.A. and other suppliers.

In November 2007, we acquired together with The Coca-Cola Company 100.0% of the shares of capital stock of Jugos del Valle. Jugos del Valle sells fruit juice-based beverages and fruit derivatives. The business of Jugos del Valle in the United States was acquired and sold by The Coca-Cola Company. In 2008, we, The Coca-Cola Company and all Mexican and Brazilian Coca-Cola bottlers entered into a joint business for the Mexican and Brazilian operations, respectively, of Jugos del Valle. As of April 8, 2016, we held an interest of 26.3% in the Mexican joint business. In August 2010, we acquired from The Coca-Cola Company, along with other Brazilian Coca-Cola bottlers, Leão Alimentos, manufacturer and distributor of the Matte Leão tea brand. In January 2013, our Brazilian joint business of Jugos del Valle merged with Leão Alimentos. As of April 8, 2016, we held a 24.4% indirect interest in the Matte Leão business in Brazil.

In February 2009, we acquired together with The Coca-Cola Company the Brisa bottled water business in Colombia from Bavaria, S.A. a subsidiary of SABMiller plc. We acquired the production assets and the distribution territory, and The Coca-Cola Company acquired the Brisa brand. We and The Coca-Cola Company equally shared in paying the purchase price of US$92 million. Following a transition period, in June 2009, we started to sell and distribute the Brisa portfolio of products in Colombia.

In May 2009, we entered into an agreement to begin selling the Crystal trademark water products in Brazil jointly with The Coca-Cola Company.

In March 2011, we acquired together with The Coca-Cola Company, through Compañía Panameña de Bebidas, S.A.P.I. de C.V., Estrella Azul, a Panamanian conglomerate that participates in the dairy and juice-based beverage categories in Panama. We continue to develop this business with The Coca-Cola Company.

 

77


Table of Contents

In March 2011, we entered along with The Coca-Cola Company, through Compañía Panameña de Bebidas S.A.P.I. de C.V., into several credit agreements, or the Credit Facilities, the proceeds of which were used to lend an aggregate amount of US$112,257,620 to Estrella Azul. Subject to certain events which could lead to an acceleration of payments, the principal balance of the Credit Facilities is payable in one installment on March 24, 2021. In March 2014, these Credit Facilities were paid in full.

In August 2012, we acquired, through Jugos del Valle, an indirect participation in Santa Clara, a producer of milk and dairy products in Mexico. As of April 8, 2016, we owned an indirect participation of 26.3% in Santa Clara.

In January, 2013, as part of our efforts to expand our geographic reach, we acquired a 51.0% non-controlling majority stake in CCFPI from The Coca-Cola Company. We have an option to acquire the remaining 49.0% stake in CCFPI at any time during the seven years following the closing date. We also have a put option to sell our ownership in CCFPI to The Coca-Cola Company commencing on the fifth anniversary of the closing date and ending on the sixth anniversary of the closing date. We currently manage the day-to-day operations of the business; however, pursuant to our shareholders’ agreement with The Coca-Cola Company (a) during a four-year period ending January 25, 2017, all decisions must be approved jointly with The Coca-Cola Company, (b) following this four-year period, all decisions related to the annual normal operations plan and any other ordinary matters will be approved only by us, (c) The Coca-Cola Company has the right to appoint (and may remove) CCFPI’s chief financial officer, and (d) we have the right to appoint (and may remove) the chief executive officer and all other officers of CCFPI. We currently recognize the results of CCFPI in our financial statements using the equity method.

Associated Companies

We also regularly engage in transactions with companies in which we own an equity interest that are not affiliated with The Coca-Cola Company, as described under “—The Coca-Cola Company.” We believe these transactions are on terms comparable to those that would result from arm’s length negotiations with unaffiliated third parties.

In Mexico, we purchase sparkling beverages in cans from Industria Envasadora de Querétaro, S.A. de C.V., or IEQSA, in which we hold an equity interest of 26.5%. We paid IEQSA Ps.731 million, Ps.591 million and Ps.615 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. IEQSA purchases aluminum cans from FEMSA. We also purchase sugar from Beta San Miguel and PIASA, both sugar-cane producers in which, as of April 8, 2016, we held a 2.7% and 36.3% equity interest, respectively. We paid Ps.1,264 million, Ps.1,389 million and Ps.1,557 million to Beta San Miguel in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. We paid Ps.1,236 million, Ps.1,020 million, and Ps.956 million to PIASA in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

In Mexico, we hold a 35.0% interest as of April 8, 2016 in PROMESA, a cooperative of Coca-Cola bottlers. Through PROMESA, we purchase cans for our Mexican operations, which are manufactured by FAMOSA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cuauhtémoc Moctezuma Holding, S.A. de C.V., currently a wholly owned subsidiary of the Heineken Group. We purchased from PROMESA approximately Ps.587 million, Ps.567 million and Ps.670 million in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Other Related Party Transactions

José Antonio Fernández Carbajal, our chairman of the board of directors, is also the chairman of the board of directors of ITESM, a Mexican private university that routinely receives donations from us.

Carlos Salazar Lomelín, a member of our board of directors, is also CEO of FEMSA and chairman of the consultant committee of EGADE, the graduate business school of ITESM, which is a prestigious university system with headquarters in Monterrey, Mexico. ITESM routinely receives donations from us and our subsidiaries.

Ricardo Guajardo Touché, a member of our board of directors, is also a member of the board of directors of ITESM.

Allen & Company LLC provides investment banking services to us and our affiliates in the ordinary course of its business. Enrique F. Senior Hernández, one of our directors, is a Managing Director of Allen & Company LLC, and Herbert Allen III, an alternate director, is the president of Allen & Company LLC.

We are insured in Mexico primarily under certain of FEMSA’s insurance policies, some of which are issued by Grupo Nacional Provincial S.A., of which the son of the chairman of its board of directors, Alejandro Bailleres Gual is one of our alternate members of the board of directors. FEMSA has informed us that the policies were purchased pursuant to a competitive bidding process.

 

78


Table of Contents

In October 2011, we executed certain agreements with affiliates of Grupo Tampico that are still in effect, to acquire specific products and services such as plastic cases, certain trucks and car brands, as well as auto parts exclusively for the territories of Grupo Tampico, which agreements provide for certain preferences to be elected as suppliers in our suppliers’ bidding processes.

See Notes 6 and 13 to our consolidated financial statements for more information on our related party transactions, including transactions with parties that fall within the related party definition pursuant to IFRS rules.

 

Item 8. Financial Information

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Consolidated Financial Statements

See “Item 18. Financial Statements” beginning on page F-1.

Dividend Policy

For a discussion of our dividend policy, see “Item 3. Key Information—Dividends and Dividend Policy.”

Significant Changes

Except as disclosed under “ Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—General—Recent Developments in the Venezuelan Exchange Control Regime ,” no significant changes have occurred since the date of the annual financial statements included in this annual report.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are party to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Other than as disclosed in this annual report, we are not currently involved in any litigation or arbitration proceeding, including any proceeding that is pending or threatened of which we are aware, which we believe will have, or has had, a material adverse effect on our company. Other legal proceedings that are pending against or involve us and our subsidiaries are incidental to the conduct of our and their business. We believe that the ultimate resolution of such other proceedings individually or in an aggregate basis will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition or results.

Mexico

Antitrust Matters . During 2000, the COFECE, motivated by complaints filed by PepsiCo and certain of its bottlers in Mexico, began an investigation of The Coca-Cola Company Export Corporation and the Mexican Coca-Cola bottlers for alleged monopolistic practices through exclusivity arrangements with certain retailers. Nine of our Mexican subsidiaries, including those acquired through our merger with Grupo Tampico, Grupo CIMSA and Grupo Fomento Queretano, were involved in this matter. After the corresponding legal proceedings in 2008, a Mexican Federal Court rendered an adverse judgment against three of our nine Mexican subsidiaries involved in the proceedings, upholding a fine of approximately Ps.10.5 million imposed by COFECE on each of the three subsidiaries and ordering the immediate suspension of such practices of alleged exclusivity arrangements and conditional dealings. On August 7, 2012, a Federal Court dismissed and denied an appeal that we filed on behalf of one of our subsidiaries after the merger with Grupo Fomento Queretano, which had received an adverse judgment. We filed a motion for reconsideration on September 12, 2012, which was resolved on March 22, 2013 confirming the Ps.10.5 million fine imposed by the COFECE. With respect to the complaints against the remaining six subsidiaries, a favorable resolution was issued in the Mexican Federal Courts and, consequently, the COFECE withdrew the fines and ruled in favor of six of our subsidiaries on the grounds of insufficient evidence to prove individual and specific liability in the alleged antitrust violations.

In addition, among the companies involved in the 2000 complaint filed by PepsiCo and other bottlers in Mexico, were some of our less significant subsidiaries acquired with the Grupo Yoli merger. On June 30, 2005, the COFECE imposed a fine on one of our subsidiaries for approximately Ps.10.5 million. A motion for reconsideration on this matter was filed on September 21, 2005, which was resolved by the COFECE confirming the original resolution on December 1, 2005. A constitutional challenge ( amparo) was filed against said resolution and a Federal Court issued a favorable resolution in our benefit. Both the COFECE and PepsiCo filed appeals against said resolution and a Circuit Court in Acapulco, Guerrero resolved to request the COFECE to issue a new resolution regarding the Ps.10.5 million fine. COFECE then fined our subsidiary again, for the same amount. A new amparo claim was filed against said resolution.

 

79


Table of Contents

On May 17, 2012, such new amparo claim was resolved, again in favor of one of our subsidiaries, requesting the COFECE to recalculate the amount of the fine. The COFECE maintained the amount of the fine in a new resolution which we challenged through a new amparo claim filed on July 31, 2013 before a District Judge in Acapulco, Guerrero and are still awaiting final resolution.

In February 2009, the COFECE began a new investigation of alleged monopolistic practices filed by PepsiCo consisting of sparkling beverage sales subject to exclusivity agreements and the granting of discounts and/or benefits in exchange for exclusivity arrangements with certain retailers. In December 2011, the COFECE closed this investigation on the grounds of insufficient evidence of monopolistic practices by The Coca-Cola Company and some of its bottlers, including us. On February 9, 2012, PepsiCo appealed the decision of the COFECE. The COFECE confirmed its decision on May 3, 2012.

In June and July 2010, Ajemex, S.A. de C.V., or Ajemex, filed two complaints with the COFECE against The Coca-Cola Export Corporation and certain Coca-Cola bottlers, including us, alleging the continued performance of monopolistic practices in breach of COFECE’s resolution dated June 30, 2005. On January 23, 2015, The Coca-Cola Export Corporation and the Coca-Cola bottlers provided evidence to COFECE against these allegations. The COFECE ruled upon these proceedings in favor of The Coca-Cola Export Corporation and the Coca-Cola bottlers. On April 6, 2015, Ajemex filed an amparo claim against said resolution, which was dismissed and denied by a Federal District Judge. No further action was pursued by Ajemex, and the resolution became final.

 

Item 9. The Offer and Listing

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low nominal sale prices for the Series L shares on the Mexican Stock Exchange and the reported high and low nominal sale prices for the ADSs on the NYSE:

 

     Mexican Stock  Exchange
Mexican pesos per Series L Share
     New York Stock Exchange
U.S. dollars per ADS
 
     High (1)      Low (1)      High (1)      Low (1)  

2011:

           

Full year

   Ps. 135.91       Ps. 87.40       US$ 98.90       US$ 72.08   

2012:

           

Full year

     191.34         125.61         149.43         94.30   

2013:

           

Full year

     219.70         146.23         178.66         111.66   

2014:

           

Full year

     155.38         121.59         120.08         84.22   

First quarter

     153.49         121.59         117.83         91.60   

Second quarter

     155.38         129.58         120.08         99.60   

Third quarter

     149.54         131.80         115.78         98.31   

Fourth quarter

     142.07         124.45         105.80         84.22   

2015:

           

Full year

     132.03         113.51         89.91         65.90   

First quarter

     132.03         119.22         89.91         78.53   

Second quarter

     131.64         120.01         86.64         77.74   

Third quarter

     128.28         113.51         81.33         65.90   

Fourth quarter

     131.97         114.45         79.89         68.16   

October

     128.88         114.45         77.40         68.16   

November

     131.97         126.20         79.89         75.24   

December

     129.26         122.52         78.25         70.70   

2016

           

January

     127.50         116.91         70.81         64.48   

February

     135.65         124.27         73.84         67.12   

March

     143.56         134.54         83.13         75.16   

 

(1) High and low closing prices for the periods presented.

 

80


Table of Contents

TRADING ON THE MEXICAN STOCK EXCHANGE

The Mexican Stock Exchange or the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V. , located in Mexico City, is the only stock exchange in Mexico. Trading takes place principally through automated systems that are open between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Mexico City time, each business day. Beginning in March 2008, during daylight savings time, trading hours change to match the NYSE trading hours, opening at 7:30 a.m. and closing at 2:00 p.m. local time. The Mexican Stock Exchange operates a system of automatic suspension of trading in shares of a particular issuer as a means of controlling excessive price volatility, but under current regulations this system does not apply to securities such as the Series L shares in the form of ADSs that are directly or indirectly quoted on a stock exchange outside of Mexico.

Settlement is effected three business days after a share transaction on the Mexican Stock Exchange. Deferred settlement, even by mutual agreement, is not permitted without the approval of the Mexican Stock Exchange. Most securities traded on the Mexican Stock Exchange, including our shares, are on deposit with S.D. Indeval Instituto para el Depósito de Valores, S.A. de C.V., which we refer to as Indeval, a privately owned securities depositary that acts as a clearinghouse for Mexican Stock Exchange transactions.

 

Item 10. Additional Information

BYLAWS

The following is a summary of the material provisions of our bylaws and applicable Mexican law. The last amendment of our bylaws was approved on October 10, 2011. For a description of the provisions of our bylaws relating to our board of directors and executive officers, see Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.

The main changes made to our bylaws on October 10, 2011, were to Article 25 which increased the number of our board members from 18 to 21 and the number of directors that each series is entitled to appoint, and Article 26 which provides that the shareholders meeting that approves Series B shares issuance will determine which series of shares is to reduce the number of directors that such series is entitled to appoint. Article 6 of our bylaws was also amended to include the number of shares included in our minimum fixed capital stock without the right to withdraw.

Organization and Register

We were incorporated on October 30, 1991, as a stock corporation with variable capital ( sociedad anónima de capital variable ) in accordance with the Mexican General Corporations Law ( Ley General de Sociedades Mercantiles ). On December 5, 2006, we became a publicly traded stock corporation with variable capital ( sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable ) and amended our bylaws in accordance with the Mexican Securities Market Law. We were registered in the Public Registry of Property and Commerce ( Registro Público de la Propiedad y del Comercio ) of Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico on November 22, 1991 under mercantile number 2986, folio 171, volume 365, third book of the commerce section. In addition, due to the change of address of our company to Mexico City, we have also been registered in the Public Registry of Property and Commerce of Mexico City since June 28, 1993 under mercantile number 176,543.

Purposes

The main corporate purposes of our company include the following:

 

   

to establish, promote and create corporations or companies of any type, as well as to acquire and possess shares or equity participations in such entities;

 

   

to carry out all types of transactions involving bonds, shares, equity, participations and securities of any type;

 

   

to provide or receive advisory, consulting or other types of services;

 

   

to conduct business with equipment, raw materials and any other items necessary to the companies in which we have an interest in or with whom we have commercial relations;

 

   

to acquire and dispose of trademarks, tradenames, commercial names, copyrights, patents, inventions, franchises, distributions, concessions and processes;

 

   

to possess, build, lease and operate real and personal property, install or by any other title operate plants, warehouses, workshops, retail or deposits necessary to comply with our corporate purpose;

 

81


Table of Contents
   

to subscribe, buy and sell stocks, bonds and securities among other things; and

 

   

to draw, accept, make, endorse or guarantee negotiable instruments, issue bonds secured with real property or unsecured, and to make us jointly liable, to grant security of any type with regard to obligations entered into by us or by third parties, and in general, to perform the acts, enter into the agreements and carry out other transactions as may be necessary or conducive to our business purpose.

Voting Rights, Transfer Restrictions and Certain Minority Rights

Series A and Series D shares have full voting rights and are subject to transfer restrictions. Although no Series B shares have been issued, our bylaws provide for the issuance of Series B shares with full voting rights that are freely transferable. Series L shares are freely transferable but have limited voting rights. None of our shares are exchangeable for shares of a different series. The rights of all series of our capital stock are substantially identical except for:

 

   

restrictions on transfer of the Series A and Series D shares;

 

   

limitations on the voting rights of Series L shares;

 

   

the respective rights of the Series A, Series D and Series L shares, voting as separate classes in a special meeting, to elect specified numbers of our directors and alternate directors;

 

   

the respective rights of Series D shares to participate in the voting of extraordinary matters, as they are defined by our bylaws; and

 

   

prohibitions on non-Mexican ownership of Series A shares. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees,” and “—Additional Transfer Restrictions Applicable to Series A and Series D shares.”

Under our bylaws, holders of Series L shares are entitled to vote in limited circumstances. They may appoint for election and elect up to three of our maximum of 21 directors and, in certain circumstances where holders of Series L shares have not voted for the director elected by holders of the majority of these series of shares, they may be entitled to elect and remove one director, through a general shareholders meeting, for every 10.0% they own of all issued, subscribed and paid shares of the capital stock of our company, pursuant to the Mexican Securities Market Law. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.” In addition, they are entitled to vote on certain matters, including certain changes in our corporate form, mergers involving our company when our company is the merged entity or when the principal corporate purpose of the merged entity is not related to the corporate purpose of our company, the cancellation of the registration of the Series L shares in the Mexican Stock Exchange or any other foreign stock exchange and those matters for which the Mexican Securities Market Law expressly allow them to vote.

Holders of our shares in the form of ADSs will receive notice of shareholders meetings from our ADS depositary in sufficient time to enable such holders to return voting instructions to the ADS depositary in a timely manner. Our past practice, which we intend to continue, has been to inform the depositary to timely notify holders of our shares in the form of ADSs of upcoming votes and ask for their instructions.

A quorum of 82.0% of our subscribed and paid shares of capital stock (including the Series L shares) and the vote of at least a majority of our capital stock voting (and not abstaining) at such extraordinary meeting is required for:

 

   

changes in the corporate form of our company from one type of company to another (other than changing from a variable capital to fixed-capital corporation and vice versa);

 

   

any merger where we are not the surviving entity or any merger with an entity whose principal corporate purposes are different from those of our company or our subsidiaries; and

 

   

cancellation of the registration of our Series L shares with the Mexican Registry of Securities, or RNV, maintained by the CNBV or with other foreign stock exchanges on which our shares may be listed.

In the event of cancellation of the registration of any of our shares in the RNV, whether by order of the CNBV or at our request with the prior consent of 95.0% of the holders of our outstanding capital stock, our bylaws and the Mexican Securities Market Law require us to make a public offer to acquire these shares prior to their cancellation.

Holders of Series L shares may attend, but not address, meetings of shareholders at which they are not entitled to vote.

Under our bylaws and the Mexican General Corporations Law, holders of shares of any series are entitled to vote as a class in a special meeting governed by the same rules that apply to extraordinary meetings on any action that would have an effect on the rights of holders of shares of such series. There are no procedures for determining whether a particular proposed shareholder action requires a class vote, and Mexican law does not provide extensive guidance on the criteria to be applied in making such a determination.

 

82


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the Mexican Securities Market Law, we are subject to a number of minority shareholder protections. These minority protections include provisions that permit:

 

   

for every 10.0% of our outstanding capital stock entitled to vote (including in a limited or restricted manner) held by holders, either individually or as a group, such holders may require the chairman of the board of directors or of the Audit or Corporate Practices Committees to call a shareholders meeting;

 

   

holders of at least 5.0% of our outstanding capital stock may bring an action for liability against our directors, the secretary of the board of directors or certain key officers;

 

   

for every 10.0% of our outstanding capital stock who are entitled to vote, including limited or restricted vote, held by holders, either individually or as a group, such holders at any shareholders meeting to request that resolutions with respect to any matter on which they considered they were not sufficiently informed be postponed;

 

   

holders of 20.0% of our outstanding capital stock to oppose any resolution adopted at a shareholders meeting in which they are entitled to vote and file a petition for a court order to suspend the resolution temporarily within 15 days following the adjournment of the meeting at which the action was taken, provided that (1) the challenged resolution violates Mexican law or our bylaws, (2) the opposing shareholders neither attended the meeting nor voted in favor of the challenged resolution and (3) the opposing shareholders deliver a bond to the court to secure payment of any damages that we may suffer as a result of suspending the resolution in the event that the court ultimately rules against the opposing shareholder; and

 

   

for every 10.0% of our outstanding capital stock who are entitled to vote, including limited or restricted vote, held by holders, either individually or as a group, such holders to appoint one member of our board of directors and one alternate member of our board of directors up to the maximum number of directors that each series is entitled to appoint under our bylaws.

Shareholders Meetings

General shareholders meetings may be ordinary meetings or extraordinary meetings. Extraordinary meetings are those called to consider certain matters specified in Article 182 of the Mexican General Corporations Law, Article 53 of the Mexican Securities Market Law and in our bylaws. These matters include, among others: amendments to the bylaws, liquidation, dissolution, merger and transformation from one form of company to another, issuance of preferred stock and increases and reductions of the fixed portion of our capital stock. In addition, our bylaws require an extraordinary meeting to consider the cancellation of the registration of our shares with the RNV or with other foreign stock exchanges on which our shares may be listed, the amortization of distributable earnings into capital stock, and an increase in our capital stock. All other matters, including increases or decreases affecting the variable portion of our capital stock, are considered at an ordinary meeting.

Pursuant to Mexican law, an ordinary annual meeting must be held at least once each year (1) to consider the approval of the financial statements of our company for the preceding fiscal year, (2) to determine the allocation of the profits of the preceding fiscal year and (3) to appoint the members of the board of directors of our company. The holders of Series A and Series D shares are entitled to vote in such ordinary annual meeting regarding all three matters mentioned above, and the holders of Series L shares are exclusively entitled to vote in relation to the appointment of members of the board of directors (i.e. three directors and their respective alternate directors). Further, any transaction to be entered into by us or our subsidiaries within the next fiscal year that represents 20.0% or more of our consolidated assets must be approved at an ordinary shareholders meeting at which holders of Series L shares shall be entitled to vote.

Mexican law provides for a special meeting of shareholders to allow holders of shares of a specific series to vote as a class on any action that would prejudice exclusively the rights of holders of such series. Holders of Series A, Series D and Series L shares at their respective special meetings or at an annual ordinary meeting, must appoint, remove or ratify directors, as well as determine their compensation.

The quorum for ordinary and extraordinary meetings at which holders of Series L shares are not entitled to vote is 76.0% of the holders of subscribed and paid Series A and Series D shares, and the quorum for an extraordinary meeting at which holders of Series L shares are entitled to vote is 82.0% of the subscribed and paid shares of capital stock.

 

83


Table of Contents

The quorum for special meetings of any series of shares is 75.0% of the holders of the subscribed and paid capital stock of such shares, and action may be taken by holders of a majority of such series of shares.

Resolutions adopted at an ordinary or extraordinary shareholders meeting are valid when adopted by holders of at least a majority of the subscribed and paid in capital stock voting (and not abstaining) at the meeting, unless in the event of any decisions defined as extraordinary matters by the bylaws or any payment of dividends above 20.0% of the preceding years’ retained earnings, which shall require the approval of a majority of shareholders of each of Series A and Series D shares voting together as a single class. Resolutions adopted at a special shareholders meeting are valid when adopted by the holders of at least a majority of the subscribed and paid shares of the series of shares entitled to attend the special meeting.

Shareholders meetings may be called by the board of directors, the Audit Committee or the Corporate Practices Committee and, under certain circumstances, a Mexican court. For every 10.0% or more of our capital stock held by holders, either individually or as a group, such holders may require the chairman of the board of directors, or the chairmen of the Audit Committee or Corporate Practices Committee to call a shareholders meeting. A notice of meeting and an agenda must be published in a newspaper of general circulation in Mexico City at least 15 days prior to the meeting. Notices must set forth the place, date and time of the meeting and the matters to be addressed and must be signed by whoever convened the meeting. All relevant information relating to the shareholders meeting must be made available to shareholders starting on the date of publication of the notice. To attend a meeting, shareholders must deposit their shares with us or with Indeval or an institution for the deposit of securities prior to the meeting as indicated in the notice. If entitled to attend the meeting, a shareholder may be represented by an attorney-in-fact.

Additional Transfer Restrictions Applicable to Series A and Series D Shares

Our bylaws provide that no holder of Series A or Series D shares may sell its shares unless it has disclosed the terms of the proposed sale and the name of the proposed buyer and has previously offered to sell the shares to the holders of the other series for the same price and terms as it intended to sell the shares to a third party. If the shareholders being offered shares do not choose to purchase the shares within 90 days of the offer, the selling shareholder is free to sell the shares to the third party at the price and under the specified terms. In addition, our bylaws impose certain procedures in connection with the pledge of any Series A or Series D shares to any financial institution that are designed, among other things, to ensure that the pledged shares will be offered to the holders of the other series at market value prior to any foreclosure. Finally, a proposed transfer of Series A or Series D shares other than a proposed sale or a pledge, or a change of control of a holder of Series A or Series D shares that is a subsidiary of a principal shareholder, would trigger rights of first refusal to purchase the shares at market value. See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—The Shareholders Agreement.”

Dividend Rights

At the annual ordinary meeting of holders of Series A and Series D shares, the board of directors submits our financial statements for the previous fiscal year, together with a report thereon by the board of directors. Once the holders of Series A and Series D shares have approved the financial statements, they determine the allocation of our net income for the preceding year. Mexican law requires the allocation of at least 5.0% of net income to a legal reserve, which is not subsequently available for distribution until the amount of the legal reserve equals 20.0% of our capital stock. Thereafter, the holders of Series A and Series D shares may determine and allocate a certain percentage of net income to any general or special reserve, including a reserve for open-market purchases of our shares. The remainder of net income is available for distribution in the form of dividends to the shareholders.

All shares outstanding and fully paid (including Series L shares) at the time a dividend or other distribution is declared are entitled to share equally in the dividend or other distribution. No series of shares is entitled to a preferred dividend. Shares that are only partially paid, participate in a dividend or other distributions in the same proportion that the shares have been paid at the time of the dividend or other distributions. Treasury shares are not entitled to dividends or other distributions.

Change in Capital

According to our bylaws, any change in our authorized capital stock requires a resolution of an extraordinary meeting of shareholders. We are permitted to issue shares representing fixed capital and shares representing variable capital. The fixed portion of our capital stock may be increased or decreased only by amendment of our bylaws adopted by a resolution at an extraordinary meeting of the shareholders. The variable portion of our capital stock may be increased or decreased by resolution of an ordinary meeting of the shareholders without amending our bylaws. All changes in the fixed or variable capital have to be registered in our capital variation registry, as required by the applicable law.

 

84


Table of Contents

A capital stock increase may be effected through the issuance of new shares for payment in cash or in kind, or by capitalization of indebtedness or of certain items of equity. Treasury stock may only be sold pursuant to a public offering.

Preemptive Rights

The Mexican Securities Market Law permits the issuance and sale of shares through a public offering without granting shareholders preemptive rights, if permitted by the bylaws and upon, among other things, authorization of the CNBV and the approval of the extraordinary shareholders meeting called for such purpose. Under Mexican law and our bylaws, except in these circumstances and other limited circumstances (including mergers, sale of repurchased shares, convertible securities into shares and capital increases by means of payment in kind for shares or shares issued in return for the cancellation of debt), in the event of an increase in our capital stock, a holder of record generally has the right to subscribe shares of a series held by such holder sufficient to maintain such holder’s existing proportionate holding of shares of that series. Preemptive rights must be exercised during a term fixed by the shareholders at the meeting declaring the capital increase, which term must last at least 15 days following the publication of notice of the capital increase in the Mexican Official State Gazette. As a result of applicable United States securities laws, holders of ADSs may be restricted in their ability to participate in the exercise of preemptive rights under the terms of the deposit agreement. Shares subject to a preemptive rights offering, with respect to which preemptive rights have not been exercised, may be sold by us to third parties on the same terms and conditions previously approved by the shareholders or the board of directors. Under Mexican law, preemptive rights cannot be waived in advance or be assigned, or be represented by an instrument that is negotiable separately from the corresponding shares.

Limitations on Share Ownership

Ownership of shares of Mexican companies by non-Mexican residents is regulated by the 1993 Foreign Investment Law and its regulations, as amended. The Mexican Foreign Investment Commission is responsible for enforcing and supervising compliance with the Mexican Foreign Investment Law and its regulations.

As a general rule, the Mexican Foreign Investment Law allows foreign holdings of up to 100.0% of the capital stock of Mexican companies, except for those companies engaged in certain specified restricted industries. The Mexican Foreign Investment Law and its regulations require that Mexican shareholders retain the power to determine the administrative control and the management of corporations in industries in which special restrictions on foreign holdings are applicable. Foreign investment in our shares is not limited under either the Mexican Foreign Investment Law or its regulations.

Although the Mexican Foreign Investment Law grants broad authority to the Mexican Foreign Investment Commission to allow foreign investors to own more than 49.0% of the capital of Mexican enterprises after taking into consideration public policy and economic concerns, our bylaws provide that Series A shares must at all times constitute no less than 51.0% of all outstanding common shares with full voting rights (excluding Series L shares) and may only be held by Mexican investors. Under our bylaws, in the event Series A shares are subscribed or acquired by any other shareholders holding shares of any other series, and the shareholder is of a citizenship other than Mexican, these Series A shares are automatically converted into shares of the same series of stock that this shareholder owns, and this conversion will be considered perfected at the same time as the subscription or acquisition.

Other Provisions

Authority of the Board of Directors . The board of directors is our main managing body and is authorized to take any action in connection with our operations not expressly reserved to our shareholders. Pursuant to the Mexican Securities Market Law, the board of directors must approve, observing at all moments their duty of care and duty of loyalty, among other matters the following:

 

   

any related party transactions outside the ordinary course of our business;

 

   

significant asset transfers or acquisitions;

 

   

material guarantees or collateral;

 

   

appointment of officers and managers deemed necessary, as well as the creation of the necessary committees;

 

   

the annual business plan and the five-year business plan; internal policies; and

 

   

other material transactions.

 

85


Table of Contents

Meetings of the board of directors are validly convened and held if a majority of the members are present. Resolutions passed at these meetings will be valid if approved by a majority of the directors voting (and not abstaining). The majority of the members, which shall include the vote of at least two Series D shares directors, shall approve any extraordinary decision including any new business acquisition or combination or any change in the existing line of business, among others. Subject to the voting requirements, the chairman of the board of directors may cast a tie-breaking vote in such matters in which the Series D shares directors are not entitled to vote.

See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Directors” and “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—Board Practices.”

Redemption . Our fully paid shares are subject to redemption in connection with either (1) a reduction of capital stock or (2) a redemption with distributable earnings, which, in either case, must be approved by our shareholders at an extraordinary shareholders meeting. The shares subject to any such redemption would be selected by us by lot or in the case of redemption with distributable earnings, by purchasing shares by means of a tender offer conducted on the Mexican Stock Exchange, in accordance with the Mexican General Corporations Law and the Mexican Securities Market Law.

Repurchase of Shares . According to our bylaws, and subject to the provisions of the Mexican Securities Market Law and under rules promulgated by the CNBV, we may repurchase our shares.

In accordance with the Mexican Securities Market Law, our subsidiaries may not purchase, directly or indirectly, shares of our capital stock or any security that represents such shares.

Forfeiture of Shares . As required by Mexican law, our bylaws provide that non-Mexican holders of our shares are (1) considered to be Mexican with respect to such shares that they acquire or hold and (2) may not invoke the protection of their own governments in respect of the investment represented by those shares. Failure to comply with our bylaws may result in a penalty of forfeiture of a shareholder’s capital stock in favor of the Mexican state. Under this provision, a non-Mexican holder of our shares (including a non-Mexican holder of ADSs) is deemed to have agreed not to invoke the protection of its own government by asking such government to interpose a diplomatic claim against the Mexican state with respect to its rights as a shareholder, but is not deemed to have waived any other rights it may have, including any rights under the United States securities laws, with respect to its investment in our company. If a shareholder should invoke governmental protection in violation of this agreement, its shares could be forfeited to the Mexican state.

Duration . Our bylaws provide that our company’s term is for 99 years from its date of incorporation, unless extended through a resolution of an extraordinary shareholders meeting.

Fiduciary Duties—Duty of Care . The Mexican Securities Market Law provides that the directors shall act in good faith and in our best interest and in the best interest of our subsidiaries. In order to fulfill its duty, the board of directors may:

 

   

request information about us or our subsidiaries that is reasonably necessary to fulfill its duties;

 

   

require our officers and certain other persons, including the external auditors, to appear at board of directors’ meetings to report to the board of directors;

 

   

postpone board of directors’ meetings for up to three days when a director has not been given sufficient notice of the meeting or in the event that a director has not been provided with the information provided to the other directors; and

 

   

require a matter be discussed and voted upon by the full board of directors in the presence of the secretary of the board of directors.

Our directors may be liable for damages for failing to comply with their duty of care if such failure causes economic damage to us or our subsidiaries and the director (1) failed to attend board of directors’ or committee meetings and as a result of, such failure, the board of directors is unable to take action, unless such absence is approved by the shareholders meeting, (2) failed to disclose to the board of directors or the committees material information necessary for the board of directors to reach a decision, unless legally prohibited from doing so or required to do so to maintain confidentiality, and (3) failed to comply with the duties imposed by the Mexican Securities Market Law or our bylaws.

Fiduciary Duties—Duty of Loyalty . The Mexican Securities Market Law provides that the directors and secretary of the board of directors shall keep confidential any non-public information and matters about which they have knowledge as a result of their position. Also, directors should abstain from participating, attending or voting at meetings related to matters where they have a conflict of interest.

 

86


Table of Contents

The directors and secretary of the board of directors will be deemed to have violated the duty of loyalty, and will be liable for damages, when they obtain an economic benefit by virtue of their position. Further, the directors will fail to comply with their duty of loyalty if they:

 

   

vote at a board of directors’ meeting or take any action on a matter involving our assets where there is a conflict of interest;

 

   

fail to disclose a conflict of interest during a board of directors’ meeting;

 

   

enter into a voting arrangement to support a particular shareholder or group of shareholders against the other shareholders;

 

   

approve transactions without complying with the requirements of the Mexican Securities Market Law;

 

   

use company property in violation of the policies approved by the board of directors;

 

   

unlawfully use material non-public information; and

 

   

usurp a corporate opportunity for their own benefit or the benefit of a third party, without the prior approval of the board of directors.

Appraisal Rights . Whenever the shareholders approve a change of corporate purpose, change of nationality or change the corporate form of our company, any shareholder entitled to vote on such change that has voted against it, may withdraw as a shareholder of our company and have its shares redeemed at a price per share calculated as specified under applicable Mexican law, provided that it exercises its right within 15 days following the adjournment of the meeting at which the change was approved. In this case, the shareholder would be entitled to the reimbursement of its shares, in proportion to our assets in accordance with the last approved balance sheet. Because holders of Series L shares are not entitled to vote on certain types of these changes, these withdrawal rights are available to holders of Series L shares in fewer cases than to holders of other series of our capital stock.

Liquidation . Upon our liquidation, one or more liquidators may be appointed to wind up our affairs. All fully paid and outstanding shares of capital stock (including Series L shares) will be entitled to participate equally in any distribution upon liquidation. Shares that are only partially paid participate in any distribution upon liquidation in the proportion that they have been paid at the time of liquidation. There are no liquidation preferences for any series of our shares.

Actions Against Directors . Shareholders (including holders of Series L shares) representing, in the aggregate, not less than 5.0% of the capital stock may directly bring an action against directors.

In the event of actions derived from any breach of the duty of care and the duty of loyalty, liability is exclusively in our favor. The Mexican Securities Market Law establishes that liability may be imposed on the members and the secretary of the board of directors, as well as to the relevant officers.

Notwithstanding, the Mexican Securities Market Law provides that the members of the board of directors will not incur, individually or jointly, in liability for damages and losses caused to our company, when their acts were made in good faith, provided that (1) the directors complied with the requirements of the Mexican Securities Market Law and with our bylaws, (2) the decision making or voting was based on information provided by the relevant officers, the external auditor or the independent experts, whose capacity and credibility do not offer reasonable doubt; (3) the negative economic effects could not have been foreseen, based on the information available; and (4) the resolutions of the shareholders meeting were observed.

Limited Liability . The liability of shareholders for our company’s losses is limited to their participation in our company.

 

87


Table of Contents

MATERIAL AGREEMENTS

We manufacture, package, distribute and sell sparkling beverages, still beverages, value-added dairy products, coffee products, and bottled water under bottler agreements with The Coca-Cola Company. In addition, pursuant to a tradename license agreement with The Coca-Cola Company, we are authorized to use certain trademark names of The Coca-Cola Company. For a discussion of the terms of these agreements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—Bottler Agreements.”

We operate pursuant to a shareholders agreement, as amended from time to time, among certain subsidiaries of FEMSA, The Coca-Cola Company and certain of its subsidiaries. For a discussion of the terms of this agreement, see “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Major Shareholders—The Shareholders Agreement.”

We purchase the majority of our non-returnable plastic bottles from Alpla, a provider authorized by The Coca-Cola Company, pursuant to an agreement we entered into in April 1998 for our original operations in Mexico. Under this agreement, we rent plant space to Alpla, where it produces plastic bottles to certain specifications and quantities for our use.

In July 2015, after a bidding process, we executed new agreements with Hewlett Packard for the outsourcing of technology services in all of our territories. These agreements are valid until July 2020, unless terminated by us through previous notice to Hewlett Packard.

See “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—Summary of Significant Debt Instruments” for a brief discussion of certain terms of our significant debt agreements.

See “Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions—Related Party Transactions” for a discussion of other transactions and agreements with our affiliates and associated companies.

TAXATION

The following summary contains a description of certain U.S. federal income and Mexican federal tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our Series L shares or ADSs by a holder that is a citizen or resident of the United States, a U.S. domestic corporation or a person or entity that otherwise will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net income basis in respect of the Series L shares or ADSs, which we refer to as a U.S. holder, but it does not purport to be a description of all of the possible tax considerations that may be relevant to a decision to purchase, hold or dispose of the Series L shares or ADSs. In particular, this discussion does not address all Mexican or U.S. federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to a particular investor, nor does it address the special tax rules applicable to certain categories of investors, such as banks, dealers, traders who elect to mark to market, tax-exempt entities, insurance companies, certain short-term holders of Series L shares or ADSs or investors who hold the Series L shares or ADSs as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion or integrated transaction, partnerships or partners therein or investors who have a “functional currency” other than the U.S. dollar. U.S. holders should be aware that the tax consequences of holding the Series L shares or ADSs may be materially different for investors described in the preceding sentence. This summary deals only with U.S. holders that will hold the Series L shares or ADSs as capital assets and does not address the tax treatment of a U.S. holder that owns or is treated as owning 10.0% or more of the voting shares (including Series L shares) of our company.

This summary is based upon the federal tax laws of the United States and Mexico as in effect on the date of this annual report, including the provisions of the income tax treaty between the United States and Mexico and the protocols thereto, which we refer to in this annual report as the Tax Treaty, which are subject to change. The summary does not address any tax consequences under the laws of any state or locality of Mexico or the United States or the laws of any taxing jurisdiction other than the federal laws of Mexico and the United States. Holders of the Series L shares or ADSs should consult their tax advisers as to the U.S., Mexican or other tax consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of Series L shares or ADSs, including, in particular, the effect of any foreign, state or local tax laws.

 

88


Table of Contents

Mexican Taxation

For purposes of this summary, the term “non-resident holder” means a holder that is not a resident of Mexico and that does not hold the Series L shares, or ADSs in connection with the conduct of a trade or business through a permanent establishment in Mexico. For purposes of Mexican taxation, an individual is a resident of Mexico if he or she has established his or her home in Mexico, or if he or she has another home outside Mexico but his or her “center of vital interests” (as defined in the Mexican Tax Code) is located in Mexico. The “center of vital interests” of an individual is situated in Mexico when, among other circumstances, more than 50.0% of that person’s total income during a calendar year originates from within Mexico. A legal entity is a resident of Mexico if it has its principal place of business or its place of effective management in Mexico. A Mexican citizen is presumed to be a resident of Mexico unless such a person can demonstrate that the contrary is true. If a legal entity or an individual is deemed to have a permanent establishment in Mexico for tax purposes, all income attributable to such a permanent establishment will be subject to Mexican taxes, in accordance with applicable tax laws.

Tax Considerations Relating to the Series L shares and the ADSs

Taxation of Dividends . Effective as of January 1, 2014, under Mexican income tax law, dividends, either in cash or in kind, paid to individuals that are Mexican residents, and to individuals and companies that are non-Mexican residents on our Series L shares and our Series L shares represented by ADSs are subject to a 10.0% Mexican withholding tax. However, profits that were earned and subject to income tax before January 1, 2014 are exempt from this withholding tax.

Taxation of Dispositions of ADSs or Series L shares . Effective as of January 1, 2014, gains from the sale or disposition of ADSs or Series L shares traded in the stock exchange by individuals that are Mexican residents will be subject to an income tax rate of 10.0%, and gains from the sale or disposition of ADSs or Series L shares traded in the stock exchange by individuals and companies that are non-Mexican residents will be subject to a 10.0% Mexican withholding tax. The cost at which shares were acquired prior to January 1, 2014, is calculated by using the average closing price per share in the last twenty-two days. If the closing price per share in the last twenty-two days is considered unusual as compared to the closing prices in the last six months, then the calculation is made using the average closing price per share in the last six months. However, a holder that is eligible to claim benefits from any tax treaty will be exempt from Mexican withholding tax on gains realized on a sale or other disposition of Series L shares or ADSs, provided certain additional requirements are met.

Gains on the sale or other disposition of Series L shares or ADSs made in other circumstances generally would be subject to Mexican tax, regardless of the nationality or residence of the transferor. However, under the Tax Treaty, a holder that is eligible to claim the benefits of the Tax Treaty will be exempt from Mexican tax on gains realized on a sale or other disposition of Series L shares or ADSs in a transaction that is not carried out through the Mexican Stock Exchange or other approved securities markets, so long as the holder did not own, directly or indirectly, 25.0% or more of our total capital stock (including Series L shares represented by ADSs) within the 12-month period preceding such sale or other disposition and provided that the gains are not attributable to a permanent establishment or a fixed base in Mexico. Deposits of Series L shares in exchange for ADSs and withdrawals of Series L shares in exchange for ADSs will not give rise to Mexican tax.

Other Mexican Taxes

There are no Mexican inheritance, gift, succession or value added taxes applicable to the ownership, transfer, exchange or disposition of the ADSs or the Series L shares, although gratuitous transfers of Series L shares may in certain circumstances cause a Mexican federal tax to be imposed upon the recipient. There are no Mexican stamp, issue, registration or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of the ADSs or Series L shares.

United States Taxation

Tax Considerations Relating to the Series L shares and the ADSs

In general, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, holders of ADSs will be treated as the owners of the Series L shares represented by those ADSs.

Taxation of Dividends . The gross amount of any dividends paid with respect to the Series L shares represented by ADSs or the Series L shares generally will be included in the gross income of a U.S. holder as foreign source dividend income on the day on which the dividends are received by the U.S. holder, in the case of the Series L shares, or by the depositary, in the case of the Series L shares represented by ADSs, and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

 

89


Table of Contents

Dividends, which will be paid in Mexican pesos, will be includible in the income of a U.S. holder in a U.S. dollar amount calculated, in general, by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date that they are received by the U.S. holder, in the case of the Series L shares, or by the depositary, in the case of the Series L shares represented by the ADSs (regardless of whether such Mexican pesos are in fact converted into U.S. dollars on such date). If such dividends are converted into U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. holder generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency gain or loss in respect of the dividends. Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of dividends received by an individual U.S. holder in respect of Series L shares or ADSs generally is subject to taxation at the preferential rates applicable to long-term capital gains if the dividends are “qualified dividends.” Dividends paid on the ADSs will be treated as qualified dividends if (1) we are eligible for the benefits of a comprehensive income tax treaty with the United States that the Internal Revenue Service has approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules, or the dividends are paid with respect to ADSs that are readily tradable on an established U.S. securities market and (2) the issuer was not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and is not, in the year in which the dividend is paid a passive foreign investment company. The income tax treaty between Mexico and the United States has been approved for the purposes of the qualified dividend rules. The ADSs are listed on the NYSE, and will qualify as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States so long as they are so listed. Based on our audited consolidated financial statements and relevant market and shareholder data, we believe that we were not treated as a passive foreign investment company for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to our 2015 taxable year. In addition, based on our audited financial statements and our current expectations regarding the value and nature of our assets, the sources and nature of our income, and relevant market and shareholder data, we do not anticipate becoming a passive foreign investment company for our 2016 taxable year. U.S. holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the treatment of the foreign currency gain or loss, if any, on any Mexican pesos received that are converted into U.S. dollars on a date subsequent to the date of receipt. Dividends generally will constitute foreign source “passive income” for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.

Distributions to holders of additional Series L shares with respect to their Series L shares or ADSs that are made as part of a pro rata distribution to all of our shareholders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax.

A holder of Series L shares or ADSs that is, with respect to the United States, a foreign corporation or non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on dividends received on Series L shares or ADSs unless such income is effectively connected with the conduct by the non-U.S. holder of a trade or business in the United States.

Taxation of Capital Gains . A gain or loss realized by a U.S. holder on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or Series L shares will be subject to U.S. federal income taxation as capital gain or loss in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized on the disposition and such U.S. holder’s tax basis in the ADSs or the Series L shares. Any such gain or loss will be a long-term capital gain or loss if the ADSs or Series L shares were held for more than one year on the date of such sale. Long-term capital gain recognized by a U.S. holder that is an individual is subject to reduced rates of federal income taxation. The deduction of capital loss is subject to limitations for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Deposits and withdrawals of Series L shares by U.S. holders in exchange for ADSs will not result in the realization of gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

Gain, if any, realized by a U.S. holder on the sale or other disposition of Series L shares or ADSs will be treated as U.S. source income for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.

A non-U.S. holder of Series L shares or ADSs will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on any gain realized on the sale of Series L shares or ADSs, unless (1) such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by the non-U.S. holder of a trade or business in the United States, or (2) in the case of gain realized by an individual non-U.S. holder, the non-U.S. holder is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.

United States Backup Withholding and Information Reporting

A U.S. holder of Series L shares or ADSs may, under certain circumstances, be subject to “information reporting” and “backup withholding” with respect to certain payments to such U.S. holder, such as dividends or the proceeds of a sale or disposition of Series L shares or ADSs unless such holder (1) is a corporation or comes within certain exempt categories, and demonstrates this fact when so required, or (2) in the case of backup withholding, provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies that it is not subject to backup withholding and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. Any amount withheld under these rules does not constitute a separate tax and will be creditable against the holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability. While non-U.S. holders generally are exempt from information reporting and backup withholding, a non-U.S. holder may, in certain circumstances, be required to comply with certain information and identification procedures in order to prove this exemption.

 

90


Table of Contents

DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY

We file reports, including annual reports on Form 20-F, and other information with the SEC pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC that apply to foreign private issuers. You may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at its public reference room in Washington, D.C., at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. Filings we make electronically with the SEC are also available to the public on the Internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and at our website at www.coca-colafemsa.com . (This URL is intended to be an inactive textual reference only. It is not intended to be an active hyperlink to our website. The information on our website, which might be accessible through a hyperlink resulting from this URL, is not and shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this annual report.)

 

91


Table of Contents
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

As part of our risk management strategy, we use derivative financial instruments with the purpose of (1) achieving a desired liability structure with a balanced risk profile, (2) managing the exposure to production input and raw material costs and (3) hedging balance sheet and cash flow exposures to foreign currency fluctuation. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or profit-generating purposes. We track the fair value (mark to market) of our derivative financial instruments and its possible changes using scenario analyses.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk exists principally with respect to our indebtedness that bears interest at floating rates. As of December 31, 2015, we had total indebtedness of Ps.66,730 million, of which 93.0% bore interest at fixed interest rates and 7.0% bore interest at variable interest rates. After giving effect to our swap and forward contracts, as of December 31, 2015, 76.0% of our debt was fixed-rate and 24.0% of our debt was variable-rate. The interest rate on our variable rate debt denominated in U.S. dollars is generally determined by reference to the London Interbank Offer Rate, or LIBOR; the interest rate on our variable rate debt denominated in Mexican pesos is generally determined by reference to the TIIE; and the interest rate on our variable rate debt denominated in Brazilian reais is generally determined by reference to the Brazilian Interbank Deposit Rate ( Cetip Depósitos Interfinanceiros ). If these reference rates increase, our interest payments would consequently increase.

The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates, without giving effect to interest rate swaps. The table presents weighted average interest rates by expected contractual maturity dates. Weighted average variable rates are based on the reference rates on December 31, 2015, plus spreads, contracted by us. The instruments’ actual payments are denominated in U.S. dollars, Mexican pesos, Brazilian reais, Colombian pesos and Argentine pesos. All of the payments in the table are presented in Mexican pesos, our reporting currency, converted at an exchange rate of Ps.17.20 Mexican pesos per U.S. dollar reported by Banco de México quoted to us by dealers for the settlement of obligations in foreign currencies on December 31, 2015.

The table below also includes the fair value of long-term debt based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rate is estimated using rates currently offered for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. Furthermore, the fair value of long-term notes payable is based on quoted market prices on December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2015, the fair value represents a loss amount of Ps.841 million.

Principal by Year of Maturity

 

     As of December 31, 2015      As of December 31, 2014  
     2016          2017          2018          2019          2020          2021 and    
thereafter    
     Total    
Carrying    
Value    
     Total    
Fair     
Value    
     Total    
Carrying    
Value    
 
     (in millions of Mexican pesos, except percentages)  

Long-Term Debt and Notes:

                          

Fixed Rate Debt and Notes

                          

U.S. dollars (Notes)

     —           —           17,158            —           8,566            25,609            51,333            52,990            43,893      

Interest Rate (1)

     —           —           2.4%         —           4.6%         4.4%         3.8%         —           3.8%   

U.S. dollars (Bank Loans)

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —           —           30      

Interest Rate (1)

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —           —           3.9%   

Mexican pesos ( Certificados Bursátiles )

     —           —           —           —           —           9,989            9,989            9,527            9,988      

Interest Rate (1)

     —           —           —           —           —           6.2%         6.2%         —           6.2%   

Brazilian reais (Bank Loans)

     70            97            98            95            80            111            551            386            233      

Interest Rate (1)

     6.8%         6.9%         6.9%         6.9%         6.8%         5.6%         6.6%         —           4.6%   

Brazilian reais (Financial Leasing)

     67            66            65            62            51            149            460            356            760      

Interest Rate (1)

     4.6%         4.6%         4.6%         4.6%         4.6%         4.6%         4.6%         —           4.6%   

Argentine pesos (Bank Loans)

     18            —           —           —           —           —           18            17            309      

Interest Rate (1)

     15.3%         —           —           —           —           —           15.3%         —           26.9%   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Fixed Rate

     155            163            17,321            157            8,697            35,858            62,351            63,276            55,213      

 

92


Table of Contents
     As of December 31, 2015      As of December 31, 2014  
     2016          2017          2018          2019          2020          2021 and    
thereafter    
     Total    
Carrying    
Value    
     Total    
Fair     
Value    
     Total    
Carrying    
Value    
 
     (in millions of Mexican pesos, except percentages)  

Variable Rate Debt

                          

U.S. dollars (Bank Loans)

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —           —           6,956      

Interest Rate (1)

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —           —           0.9%   

Mexican pesos (Bank Loans)

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —           —           —     

Interest Rate (1)

     —           —           —           —           —           —           —           —           —     

Mexican pesos ( Certificados Bursátiles )

     2,496            —           —           —           —           —           2,496            2,500            2,473      

Interest Rate (1)

     3.6%         —           —           —           —           —           3.6%         —           3.4%   

Brazilian reais (Bank Loans)

     107            107            107            107            74            —           502            430            83      

Interest Rate (1)

     9.2%         9.2%         9.2%         9.2%         9.2%         —           9.2%         —           7.6%   

Colombian pesos (Bank Loans)

     246            628            —           —           —           —           874            861            769      

Interest Rate (1)

     6.8%         6.4%         —           —           —           —           6.5%         —           5.9%   

Argentine pesos (Bank Loans)

     82            41            —           —           —           —           123            120            232      

Interest Rate (1)

     32.2%         32.2%         —           —           —           —           32.2%         —           21.5%   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Variable Rate

     2,931            776            107            107            74            0            3,995            3,911            10,513      

Long-Term Debt

     3,086            939            17,428            264            8,771            35,858            66,346            67,187            65,726      

Current Portion of Long-Term Debt

     3,086            —           —           —           —           —           3,086            —           905      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total Long-Term Debt

     0            939            17,428            264            8,771            35,858            61,046            67,187            64,821      

Derivative Financial Instruments:

                          

Cross-Currency Swaps (Mexican pesos)

                          1,899         

Notional to pay

           5,809                     5,809               5,809      

Notional to receive

           7,571                     7,571               6,476      

Interest pay rate

     —           —           3.46%         —           —           —           3.46%         —           3.25%   

Interest receive rate

     —           —           2.38%         —           —           —           2.38%         —           2.38%   

Cross-Currency Swaps (Brazilian reais)

                          317         

Notional to pay

           22,691                     22,691               23,897      

Notional to receive

           23,143                     23,143               26,964      

Interest pay rate

     —           —           12.66%         —           —           —           12.66%         —           11.28%   

Interest receive rate

     —           —           2.26%         —           —           —           2.26%         —           1.82%   

 

(1) Interest rates are weighted average contractual annual rates.

A hypothetical, instantaneous and unfavorable change of 100 basis points in the average interest rate applicable to our floating-rate financial instruments held during 2015 would have increased our interest expense by approximately Ps.175 million, or 3.0% over our interest expense of 2015, assuming no additional debt is incurred during such period, in each case after giving effect to all of our interest rate swap and cross-currency swap agreements.

 

93


Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

Our principal exchange rate risk involves changes in the value of the local currencies of each country where we operate, relative to the U.S. dollar. In 2015, the percentage of our consolidated total revenues was denominated as follows:

Total Revenues by Currency As of December 31, 2015

 

Currency    %  

Mexican peso

     44.5

Colombian peso

     8.5

Venezuelan bolivar

     5.8

Argentine peso

     9.2

Brazilian real

     24.8

Central America (1)

     7.2

 

(1) Includes Guatemalan Quetzales, Nicaraguan Córdobas, Costa Rican Colones and Panamanian Balboas.

We estimate that approximately 20.1% of our consolidated costs of goods sold are denominated in U.S. dollars for Mexican subsidiaries and in the aforementioned currencies for our non-Mexican subsidiaries. Substantially all of our costs denominated in a foreign currency, other than the functional currency of each country where we operate, are denominated in U.S. dollars. During 2015, we entered into forward derivative instruments and options to hedge part of our Mexican peso, Brazilian real, Colombian peso and Argentine peso fluctuation risk relative to our raw material costs denominated in U.S. dollars. These instruments are considered hedges for accounting purposes. As of December 31, 2015, 32.3% of our indebtedness was denominated in U.S. dollars, 28.2% in Mexican pesos and the remaining 39.5% in Brazilian reais, Colombian pesos and Argentine pesos (including the effects of our derivative contracts as of December 31, 2015, including cross currency swaps from U.S. dollars to Mexican pesos and U.S. dollars to Brazilian reais). Decreases in the value of the different currencies relative to the U.S. dollar will increase the cost of our foreign currency-denominated operating costs and expenses and of the debt service obligations with respect to our foreign currency-denominated debt. A depreciation of the Mexican peso relative to the U.S. dollar will also result in foreign exchange losses, as the Mexican peso value of our foreign currency denominated-indebtedness is increased. See also “Item 3. Key Information—Risk Factors—Depreciation of the local currencies of the countries where we operate relative to the U.S. dollar could adversely affect our financial condition and results.”

A hypothetical, instantaneous and unfavorable 10.0% devaluation in the value of each local currency in the countries where we operate relative to the U.S. dollar occurring on December 31, 2015, would have resulted in an increase in our foreign exchange (loss) gain, net of approximately Ps.1,120 million, reflecting higher foreign exchange gain generated by the cash balances held in U.S. dollars as of that date, net of the loss based on our U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness as of December 31, 2015, after giving effect to all of our interest rate swap and cross-currency swap agreements.

As of April 8, 2016, the exchange rates relative to the U.S. dollar of all the countries where we operate have appreciated or depreciated compared to December 31, 2015 as follows:

 

     Exchange Rate
As of  April 8,
2016
     (Depreciation) or Appreciation  

Mexico

     17.76         (3.2 )% 

Guatemala

     7.72         (1.2 )% 

Nicaragua

     28.30         (1.3 )% 

Costa Rica

     542.76         0.4

Panama

     1         0.0

Colombia

     3,109.60         1.3

Venezuela (1)

     306.07         (54 )% 

Brazil

     3.64         6.8

Argentina

     14.43         (10.7 )% 

 

(1) DICOM exchange rate as of April 8, 2016.

 

94


Table of Contents

A hypothetical, instantaneous and unfavorable 10.0% devaluation in the value of the currencies of each of the countries where we operate relative to the U.S. dollar as of December 31, 2015, would produce a reduction in equity of approximately the following amounts:

 

     Reduction in
Equity
 
     (in millions of Mexican pesos)  

Mexico

     1,429   

Colombia

     809   

Venezuela

     322   

Brazil

     1,265   

Argentina

     128   

Central America (1)

     729   

 

(1) Includes Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama.

Equity Risk

As of December 31, 2015, we did not have any equity risk.

Commodity Price Risk

In 2015, we entered into futures and forwards contracts to hedge the cost of sugar in Brazil, as well as futures and forward contracts to hedge the cost of aluminum in Brazil. The notional value of the sugar hedges was Ps.1,497 million as of December 31, 2015, with a fair value of Ps.(190) million with maturities in 2016. The notional value of the aluminum hedges was Ps.436 million as of December 31, 2015, with a fair value of Ps.(84) million with maturities in 2016. See Note 19 to our consolidated financial statements.

 

Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities

 

Item 12.A. Debt Securities

Not applicable.

 

Item 12.B. Warrants and Rights

Not applicable.

 

Item 12.C. Other Securities

Not applicable.

 

Item 12.D. American Depositary Shares

The Bank of New York Mellon serves as the depositary for our ADSs. Holders of our ADSs, evidenced by American Depositary Receipts, or ADRs, are required to pay various fees to the depositary, and the depositary may refuse to provide any service for which a fee is assessed until the applicable fee has been paid.

ADS holders are required to pay the depositary amounts in respect of expenses incurred by the depositary or its agents on behalf of ADS holders, including expenses arising from compliance with applicable law, taxes or other governmental charges, cable, telex and facsimile transmission, or conversion of foreign currency into U.S. dollars. The depositary may decide in its sole discretion to seek payment by either billing holders or by deducting the fee from one or more cash dividends or other cash distributions.

 

95


Table of Contents

ADS holders are also required to pay additional fees for certain services provided by the depositary, as set forth in the table below.

 

Depositary service

  

Fee payable by ADS holders

Issuance and delivery of ADRs, including in connection with share distributions

   Up to US$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)

Withdrawal of shares underlying ADSs

   Up to US$5.00 per 100 ADSs (or portion thereof)

Registration for the transfer of shares

   Registration or transfer fees that may from time to time be in effect

In addition, holders may be required to pay a fee for the distribution or sale of securities. Such fee (which may be deducted from such proceeds) would be for an amount equal to the lesser of (1) the fee for the issuance of ADSs that would be charged as if the securities were treated as deposited shares and (2) the amount of such proceeds.

Direct and indirect reimbursements by the depositary

The depositary may reimburse us for certain expenses we incur in connection with the ADS program, subject to a ceiling agreed between us and the depositary. These reimbursable expenses may include listing fees and fees payable to service providers for the distribution of material to ADR holders.

 

Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies.

Not applicable.

 

Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds.

Not applicable.

 

Item 15. Controls and Procedures

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We have evaluated, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2015. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a–15(f) and 15d–15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

96


Table of Contents

Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with IFRS. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions or our assets; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Controls—Integrated framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015.

(c) Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON INTERNAL

CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND SHAREHOLDERS OF

COCA-COLA FEMSA, S.A.B. DE C.V.:

We have audited Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the 2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting Standard Board. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standard Board, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.

 

97


Table of Contents

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated statement of financial position of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 and our report dated April 15, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Mancera, S.C.

A member practice of

Ernst & Young Global

/s/ Adan Aranda Suarez            

Adan Aranda Suarez

Mexico City, Mexico

April 15, 2016

(d) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during 2015 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Item 16.A. Audit Committee Financial Expert

Our shareholders and our board of directors have designated José Manuel Canal Hernando, an independent director as required by the Mexican Securities Market Law and applicable New York Stock Exchange listing standards, as an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of this Item 16.A. See Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees Directors.

 

Item 16.B. Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics, within the meaning of this Item 16.B of Form 20-F under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our code of ethics applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and persons performing similar functions as well as to our directors and other officers and employees. Our code of ethics is available on our website at www.coca-colafemsa.com. If we amend the provisions of our code of ethics that apply to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and persons performing similar functions, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website at the same address. In accordance with our code of ethics, we have developed a voice mailbox available to our employees to which complaints may be reported.

 

Item 16.C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table summarizes the aggregate fees billed to us by Mancera, S.C. and other Ernst & Young practices (collectively, Ernst & Young) during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2015      2014      2013  
     (in millions of Mexican pesos)  

Audit fees

     67         66         68   

Audit-related fees

     —           3         6   

Tax fees

     1         14         6   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total fees

     68         83         80   

Audit Fees. Audit fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of our quarterly financial information and statutory audits.

Audit-related Fees. Audit-related fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by Ernst & Young for assurance and other services related to the performance of the audit, mainly in connection with bond issuances and other audit related services.

 

98


Table of Contents

Tax Fees . Tax fees in the above table are fees billed by Ernst & Young for services based upon existing facts and prior transactions in order to assist us in documenting, computing and obtaining government approval for amounts included in tax filings such as transfer pricing documentation and requests for technical advice from taxing authorities.

All Other Fees. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, there were no other fees.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

We have adopted pre-approval policies and procedures under which all audit and non-audit services provided by our external auditors must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee as set forth in the Audit Committee’s charter. Any service proposals submitted by external auditors need to be discussed and approved by the Audit Committee during its meetings, which take place at least four times a year. Once the proposed service is approved, we or our subsidiaries formalize the engagement of services. The approval of any audit and non-audit services to be provided by our external auditors is specified in the minutes of our Audit Committee. In addition, the members of our Audit Committee are briefed on matters discussed by the different committees of our board of directors.

 

Item 16.D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees

Not applicable.

 

Item 16.E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not directly purchase any of our equity securities in 2015. The following table presents purchases by trusts that FEMSA administers in connection with our bonus incentive plans, which purchases may be deemed to be purchases by an affiliated purchaser of us. See Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees EVA-Based Bonus Program.

Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Period

   Total Number of Series  L
shares Purchased by
trusts that FEMSA
administers in
connection with our
bonus incentive plans
     Average
Price
Paid per
Series L Share
     Total Number  of
Shares
Purchased as
part of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
     Maximum Number  (or
Appropriate U.S.
Dollar Value) of Shares
(or Units) that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs
 

2015

     466,036         Ps. 141.26         —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     466,036         Ps. 141.26         —           —     

 

Item 16.F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

Not applicable.

 

Item 16.G. Corporate Governance

Pursuant to Rule 303A.11 of the Listed Company Manual of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), we are required to provide a summary of the significant ways in which our corporate governance practices differ from those required for U.S. companies under the NYSE listing standards. We are a Mexican corporation with shares listed on the Mexican Stock Exchange. Our corporate governance practices are governed by our bylaws, the Mexican Securities Market Law and the regulations issued by the CNBV. We also disclose the extent to which we comply with the Mexican Code of Best Corporate Practices ( C ó digo de Mejores Pr á cticas Corporativas ), which was created by a group of Mexican business leaders and was endorsed by the BMV.

 

99


Table of Contents

The table below discloses the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE standards.

 

NYSE Standards

  

Our Corporate Governance Practices

Directors Independence: A majority of the board of directors must be independent. There is an exemption for “controlled companies” (companies in which more than 50.0% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company rather than the public), which would include our company if we were a U.S. issuer.   

Directors Independence: Pursuant to the Mexican Securities Market Law, we are required to have a board of directors with a maximum of 21 members, 25.0% of whom must be independent.

 

The Mexican Securities Market Law sets forth, in Article 26, the definition of “independence,” which differs from the one set forth in Section 303A.02 of the Listed Company Manual of the NYSE. Generally, under the Mexican Securities Market Law, a director is not independent if such director: (i) is an employee or a relevant officer of the company or its subsidiaries; (ii) is an individual with significant influence over the company or its subsidiaries; (iii) is a shareholder or participant of the controlling group of the company; (iv) is a client, supplier, debtor, creditor, partner or employee of an important client, supplier, debtor or creditor of the company; or (v) is a family member of any of the aforementioned persons.

 

In accordance with the Mexican Securities Market Law, our shareholders are required to make a determination as to the independence of our directors at an ordinary meeting of our shareholders, though the CNBV may challenge that determination. Our board of directors is not required to make a determination as to the independence of our directors.

Executive sessions: Non-management directors must meet at regularly scheduled executive sessions without management.   

Executive sessions: Under our bylaws and applicable Mexican law, our non-management and independent directors are not required to meet in executive sessions.

 

Our bylaws state that the board of directors will meet at least four times a year, following the end of each quarter, to discuss our operating results and progress in achieving strategic objectives. Our board of directors can also hold extraordinary meetings.

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee: A nominating/corporate governance committee composed entirely of independent directors is required. As a “controlled company,” we would be exempt from this requirement if we were a U.S. issuer.   

Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee: We are not required to have a nominating committee, and the Mexican Code of Best Corporate Practices does not provide for a nominating committee.

 

However, Mexican law requires us to have a Corporate Practices Committee. Our Corporate Practices Committee is comprised of five members, and as required by the Mexican Securities Market Law and our bylaws, the five members are independent and the chairman of this committee is elected by our shareholders meeting.

Compensation committee: A compensation committee composed entirely of independent directors is required. As a “controlled company,” we would be exempt from this requirement if we were a U.S. issuer.    Compensation committee: We do not have a committee that exclusively oversees compensation issues. Our Corporate Practices Committee, composed entirely of independent directors, reviews and recommends management compensation programs in order to ensure that they are aligned with shareholders’ interests and corporate performance.
Audit committee: Listed companies must have an audit committee satisfying the independence and other requirements of Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act and the NYSE independence standards.    Audit committee: We have an Audit Committee of five members. As required by the Mexican Securities Market Law, each member of the Audit Committee is an independent director, and its chairman is elected by our shareholders meeting.
Equity compensation plan: Equity compensation plans require shareholder approval, subject to limited exemptions.    Equity compensation plan: Shareholder approval is not required under Mexican law or our bylaws for the adoption and amendment of an equity compensation plan. Such plans should provide for general application to all executives.

 

100


Table of Contents

NYSE Standards

  

Our Corporate Governance Practices

Code of business conduct and ethics: Corporate governance guidelines and a code of conduct and ethics are required, with disclosure of any waiver for directors or executive officers.    Code of business conduct and ethics: We have adopted a code of ethics, within the meaning of Item 16.B of SEC Form 20-F. Our code of ethics applies to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and persons performing similar functions as well as to our directors and other officers and employees. Our code of ethics is available on our website at www.coca-colafemsa.com. If we amend the provisions of our code of ethics that apply to our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and persons performing similar functions, or if we grant any waiver of such provisions, we will disclose such amendment or waiver on our website at the same address.

 

Item 16.H. Mine Safety Disclosure

Not applicable.

 

Item 17. Financial Statements

Not applicable.

 

Item 18. Financial Statements

Reference is made to Item 19(a) for a list of all financial statements filed as part of this annual report.

Item 19. Exhibits

 

(a) List of Financial Statements

 

     Page  

Report of Mancera S.C., a Member Practice of Ernst & Young Global

     F-1   

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as of December 31, 2015 and 2014

     F-2   

Consolidated Income Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

     F-3   

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

     F-4   

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

     F-5   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

     F-6   

Notes to the Audited Consolidated Financial Statements*

     F-7   

 

* All supplementary schedules relating to the registrant are omitted because they are not required or because the required information, where material, is contained in the Financial Statements or Notes thereto.

 

(b) List of Exhibits

 

Exhibit No:

  

Description

Exhibit 1.1    Amended and restated bylaws ( Estatutos Sociales ) of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., approved February 16, 2012 (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on April 26, 2012 (File No. 1-2260)).
Exhibit 2.1    Deposit Agreement, dated as of September 1, 1993, among Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., The Bank of New York (currently The Bank of New York Mellon), as Depositary, and Holders and Beneficial Owners of American Depository Receipts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registration Statement of FEMSA on Form F-4 filed on April 9, 1998 (File No. 333-8618)).

 

101


Table of Contents

Exhibit No:

  

Description

Exhibit 2.2    Indenture dated as of February 5, 2010 among Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., and The Bank of New York Mellon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 2.3    First Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 5, 2010 among Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., and The Bank of New York Mellon and The Bank of New York Mellon (Luxembourg) S.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 2.4    Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 1, 2011 among Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V. (formerly Propimex, S.A. de C.V., as Guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.4 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 17, 2011 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 2.5    Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of September 6, 2013 among Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., as issuer, Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V. (formerly Propimex, S.A. de C.V.), as existing guarantor, Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Servicios Integrados Inmuebles del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Yoli de Acapulco, S. de R.L. de C.V., as additional guarantors, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, security registrar, paying agent and transfer agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed on November 8, 2013 (File No.333-187275)).
Exhibit 2.6    Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 18, 2013 among Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., as issuer, Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V., Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Servicios Integrados Inmuebles del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Yoli de Acapulco, S. de R.L. de C.V., as existing guarantors, Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., as additional guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, security registrar, paying agent and transfer agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Registration Statement on Form F-3 filed on November 8, 2013 (File No.333-187275)).
Exhibit 2.7    Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 26, 2013 among Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., as issuer, Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V., Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Servicios Integrados Inmuebles del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V., Yoli de Acapulco, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., as guarantors, The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, security registrar, paying agent and transfer agent and The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, Dublin Branch, as Irish paying agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Form 6-K filed on December 5, 2013 (File No.1-12260)).
Exhibit 2.8    Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 21, 2014 among Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., as issuer, Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V., Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Servicios Integrados Inmuebles del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V., Yoli de Acapulco, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., as guarantors, The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, security registrar, paying agent and transfer agent and The Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV, Dublin Branch, as Irish paying agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Form 6-K filed on January 27, 2014 (File No.1-12260)).
Exhibit 2.9    Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 23, 2015 among Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., as issuer, Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V., Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Yoli de Acapulco, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., as guarantors, Distribuidora y Manufacturera del Valle de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V., as successor guarantor, and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, security registrar, paying agent and transfer agent.
Exhibit 4.1    Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement dated as of July 6, 2002, by and among Compañia Internacional de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Industrial Emprex, S.A. de C.V., The Coca-Cola Company and The Inmex Corporation, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.13 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 27, 2003 (File No. 1-12260)).

 

102


Table of Contents

Exhibit No:

  

Description

Exhibit 4.2    First Amendment, dated May 6, 2003, to the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2002, among Compañia Internacional de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Industrial Emprex, S.A. de C.V., The Coca-Cola Company, The Inmex Corporation, Atlantic Industries, Dulux CBAI 2003 B.V. and Dulux CBEXINMX 2003 B.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 27, 2003 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.3    Second Amendment, dated as of February 1, 2010, to the to the Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2002, by and among Compañia Internacional de Bebidas, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Industrial Emprex, S.A. de C.V., The Coca-Cola Company, The Inmex Corporation and Dulux CBAI 2003 B.V. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 10, 2010 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.4    Amended and Restated Bottler Agreement, dated June 21, 2003, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in the valley of Mexico (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on April 5, 2004 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.5    Supplemental Agreement, dated June 21, 1993, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in the valley of Mexico (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed on August 13, 1993 (File No. 333-67380)).
Exhibit 4.6    Amended and Restated Bottler Agreement, dated June 21, 2003, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in the southeast of Mexico (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on April 5, 2004 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.7    Supplemental Agreement, dated June 21, 1993, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in the southeast of Mexico (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed on August 13, 1993 (File No. 333-67380)).
Exhibit 4.8    Bottler Agreement and Side Letter dated June 1, 2005, between Panamco Golfo, S.A. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in Golfo, Mexico (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.7 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on April 18, 2006 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.9    Bottler Agreement and Side Letter dated June 1, 2005, between Panamco Bajio, S.A. de C.V., and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in Bajio, Mexico (English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on April 18, 2006 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.10    Bottler Agreement, dated August 22, 1994, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in Argentina (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 30, 1995 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.11    Supplemental Agreement, dated August 22, 1994, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in Argentina (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 30, 1995 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.12    Amendments, dated May 17 and July 20, 1995, to Bottler Agreement and Letter of Agreement, dated August 22, 1994, each with respect to operations in Argentina, between Coca-Cola FEMSA and The Coca-Cola Company (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 28, 1996 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.13    Bottler Agreement, dated December 1, 1995, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in SIRSA (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 28, 1996 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.14    Supplemental Agreement, dated December 1, 1995, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in SIRSA (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 28, 1996 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.15    Amendment, dated February 1, 1996, to Bottler Agreement between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company with respect to operations in SIRSA, dated December 1, 1995 (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 28, 1996 (File No. 1-12260)).

 

103


Table of Contents

Exhibit No:

  

Description

Exhibit 4.16    Amendment, dated May 22, 1998, to Bottler Agreement with respect to the former SIRSA territory, dated December 1, 1995, between Coca-Cola FEMSA and The Coca-Cola Company (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.12 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 20, 2001 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.17    Coca-Cola Tradename License Agreement dated June 21, 1993, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and The Coca-Cola Company (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.40 to FEMSA’s Registration Statement on Form F-4 filed on April 9, 1998 (File No. 333-8618)).
Exhibit 4.18    Amendment to the Trademark License Agreement, dated December 1, 2002, entered by and among Administración de Marcas S.A. de C.V., as proprietor, and The Coca-Cola Export Corporation Mexico branch, as licensee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Propimex’s (formerly Panamerican Beverages Inc.) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-12290)).
Exhibit 4.19    Trademark Sub-License Agreement, dated January 4, 2003, entered by and among Panamco Golfo S.A. de C.V., as licensor, and The Coca-Cola Company, as licensee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of Propimex’s (formerly Panamerican Beverages Inc.) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-12290)).
Exhibit 4.20    Trademark Sub-License Agreement, dated January 4, 2003, entered by and among Panamco Bajio S.A. de C.V., as licensor, and The Coca-Cola Company, as licensee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of Propimex’s (formerly Panamerican Beverages Inc.) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-12290)).
Exhibit 4.21    Supply Agreement dated June 21, 1993, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and FEMSA Empaques, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed on August 13, 1993 (File No. 333-67380)).
Exhibit 4.22    Supply Agreement dated April 3, 1998, between Alpla Fábrica de Plásticos, S.A. de C.V. and Industria Embotelladora de México, S.A. de C.V. (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on July 1, 2002 (File No. 1-12260)).*
Exhibit 4.23    Services Agreement, dated November 7, 2000, between Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and FEMSA Logística (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.15 to Coca-Cola FEMSA’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on June 20, 2001 (File No. 1-12260)).
Exhibit 4.24    Promotion and Non-Compete Agreement, dated March 11, 2003, entered by and among The Coca-Cola Export Corporation Mexico branch and Panamco Bajio S.A. de C.V. (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Propimex’s (formerly Panamerican Beverages Inc.) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-12290)).
Exhibit 4.25    Promotion and Non-Compete Agreement, dated March 11, 2003, entered by and among The Coca-Cola Export Corporation Mexico branch and Panamco Golfo S.A. de C.V. (with English translation) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of Propimex’s (formerly Panamerican Beverages Inc.) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-12290)).
Exhibit 4.26    Memorandum of Understanding, dated as of March 11, 2003, by and among Panamerican Beverages, S.A. de C.V., as seller, and The Coca-Cola Company, as buyer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Propimex’s (formerly Panamerican Beverages Inc.) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-12290)).
Exhibit 4.27    Shareholders Agreement dated as of January 25, 2013, by and among CCFPI, Coca-Cola South Asia Holdings, Inc., Coca-Cola Holdings (Overseas) Limited and Controladora de Inversiones en Bebidas Refrescantes, S.L. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 of Coca-Cola Femsa’s Annual Report on Form 20-F filed on March 15, 2013 (File No. 1-12260))
Exhibit 7.1    The Coca-Cola Company memorandum, to Steve Heyer from José Antonio Fernández, dated December 22, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to FEMSA’s Registration Statement on Amendment No. 1 to the Form F-3 filed on September 20, 2004 (File No. 333-117795)).
Exhibit 7.2    Calculation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
Exhibit 8.1    Significant Subsidiaries.
Exhibit 12.1    CEO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 15, 2016.

 

104


Table of Contents

Exhibit No:

  

Description

Exhibit 12.2    CFO Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 15, 2016.
Exhibit 13.1    Officer Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, dated April 15, 2016.
Exhibit 23.1    Consent of Mancera, S.C., a member practice of Ernst & Young Global

 

* Portions of Exhibit 4.22 were omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. Such omitted portions were filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Omitted from the exhibits filed with this annual report are certain instruments and agreements with respect to long-term debt of Coca-Cola FEMSA, none of which authorizes securities in a total amount that exceeds 10.0% of the total assets of Coca-Cola FEMSA. We hereby agree to furnish to the SEC copies of any such omitted instruments or agreements upon request by the SEC.

 

105


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on its behalf.

 

Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.

By:

  /s/ Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez
 

Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez

Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 15, 2016


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related consolidated income statements, consolidated statements of comprehensive income, consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework) and our report dated April 15, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Mancera, S.C.

A member practice of

Ernst & Young Global

/s/ Adan Aranda Suárez      

Adan Aranda Suárez

Mexico City, Mexico

April 15, 2016

 

F-1


Table of Contents

COCA-COLA FEMSA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Financial Position

At December 31, 2015 and 2014

Amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars ($) and in millions of Mexican pesos (Ps.)

 

     Note      December
2015  (*)
    December
2015
    December 2014  

ASSETS

         

Current assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

     5       $ 930      Ps. 15,989      Ps. 12,958   

Accounts receivable, net

     6         561        9,647        10,339   

Inventories

     7         469        8,066        7,819   

Recoverable taxes

        245        4,220        4,082   

Other current financial assets

     8         72        1,227        1,544   

Other current assets

     8         179        3,083        1,386   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

        2,456        42,232        38,128   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current assets:

         

Investments in associates and joint ventures

     9         1,039        17,873        17,326   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     10         2,939        50,532        50,527   

Intangible assets, net

     11         5,278        90,754        97,024   

Deferred tax assets

     23         238        4,098        2,956   

Other non-current financial assets

     12         139        2,395        3,160   

Other non-current assets, net

     12         139        2,365        3,245   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

        9,772        168,017        174,238   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL ASSETS

      $ 12,228      Ps. 210,249      Ps. 212,366   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

         

Current liabilities:

         

Bank loans and notes payable

     17       $ 23      Ps. 384      Ps. 301   

Current portion of non-current debt

     17         179        3,086        905   

Interest payable

        24        411        371   

Suppliers

        900        15,470        14,151   

Accounts payable

        276        4,744        5,336   

Taxes payable

        307        5,274        5,457   

Other current financial liabilities

     24         64        1,111        1,882   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

        1,773        30,480        28,403   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities:

         

Bank loans and notes payable

     17         3,679        63,260        64,821   

Post-employment and other non-current employee benefits

     15         131        2,261        2,324   

Deferred tax liabilities

     23         65        1,123        1,085   

Other non-current financial liabilities

     24         12        214        288   

Provisions and other non-current liabilities

     24         244        4,176        5,327   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

        4,131        71,034        73,845   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

        5,904        101,514        102,248   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity:

         

Capital stock

     21         119        2,048        2,048   

Additional paid-in capital

        2,413        41,490        41,490   

Retained earnings

        4,563        78,454        74,624   

Cumulative other comprehensive loss

        (1,003     (17,243     (12,445
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

        6,092        104,749        105,717   

Non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries

     20         232        3,986        4,401   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity

        6,324        108,735        110,118   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY

      $ 12,228      Ps. 210,249      Ps. 212,366   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(*) Convenience translation to U.S. dollars ($) – See Note 2.2.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements of financial position.

 

F-2


Table of Contents

COCA-COLA FEMSA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Income Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

Amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars ($) and in millions of Mexican pesos (Ps.) except per share amounts

 

     Note      2015  (*)      2015      2014     2013  

Net sales

      $ 8,835       Ps. 151,914       Ps. 146,948      Ps. 155,175   

Other operating revenues

        26         446         350        836   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total revenues

        8,861         152,360         147,298        156,011   

Cost of goods sold

        4,671         80,330         78,916        83,076   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

        4,190         72,030         68,382        72,935   

Administrative expenses

        372         6,405         6,385        6,487   

Selling expenses

        2,436         41,879         40,465        44,828   

Other income

     18         36         620         1,001        478   

Other expenses

     18         138         2,368         1,159        1,101   

Interest expense

        369         6,337         5,546        3,341   

Interest income

        24         414         379        654   

Foreign exchange loss, net

        85         1,459         968        739   

Loss on monetary position for subsidiaries in hyperinflationary economies

        2         33         312        393   

Market value gain on financial instruments

     19         8         142         25        46   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income before income taxes and share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method

        856         14,725         14,952        17,224   

Income taxes

     23         265         4,551         3,861        5,731   

Share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes

     9         9         155         (125     289   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

      $ 600       Ps. 10,329       Ps. 10,966      Ps. 11,782   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Attributable to:

             

Equity holders of the parent

      $ 595       Ps. 10,235       Ps. 10,542      Ps. 11,543   

Non-controlling interest

        5         94         424        239   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

      $ 600       Ps. 10,329       Ps. 10,966      Ps. 11,782   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net equity holders of the parent (U.S. dollars and Mexican pesos):

             

Earnings per share

     22       $ 0.29       Ps. 4.94       Ps. 5.09      Ps. 5.61   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(*) Convenience translation to U.S. dollars ($) – See Note 2.2.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated income statements.

 

F-3


Table of Contents

COCA-COLA FEMSA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

Amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars ($) and in millions of Mexican pesos (Ps.)

 

     Note      2015  (*)     2015     2014     2013  

Consolidated net income

      $ 600      Ps. 10,329      Ps. 10,966      Ps. 11,782   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

           

Other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

           

Unrealized loss on available-for sale securities, net of taxes

        —          —          —          (2

Valuation of the effective portion of derivative financial instruments, net of taxes

     19         (2     (27     215        (279

Exchange differences on the translation of foreign operations and associates

        (314     (5,407     (11,994     (1,565
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods

        (316     (5,434     (11,779     (1,846
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

           

Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability, net of taxes

     15         8        138        (192     (145
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income not being reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods

        8        138        (192     (145
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive loss, net of tax

        (308     (5,296     (11,971     (1,991
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

      $ 292      Ps. 5,033      Ps. (1,005   Ps. 9,791   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Attributable to:

           

Equity holders of the parent

      $ 315      Ps. 5,437      Ps. (1,382   Ps. 9,391   

Non-controlling interest

        (23     (404     377        400   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

      $ 292      Ps. 5,033      Ps. (1,005   Ps. 9,791   
     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(*) Convenience translation to U.S. dollars ($) – See Note 2.2.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

 

F-4


Table of Contents

COCA-COLA FEMSA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

Amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars ($) and in millions of Mexican pesos (Ps.)

 

Attributable to:

  Capital
Stock
    Additional
Paid-in
Capital
    Retained
Earnings
    Unrealized
Gain  on
Available
for-sale
Securities
    Valuation of
the Effective
Portion of
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
    Exchange
Differences on
Translation
of  Foreign
Operations
and
Associates
    Remeasurements
of the Net
Defined
Benefit Liability
    Equity
Attributable
To Equity
Holders of
the Parent
    Non-
Controlling
Interest
    Total Equity  

Balances at January 1, 2013

  Ps. 2,029      Ps. 33,488      Ps. 64,501      Ps. 2      Ps. (135   Ps. 2,019      Ps. (255   Ps. 101,649      Ps. 3,179      Ps. 104,828   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

    —         —         11,543        —         —         —         —         11,543        239        11,782   

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

    —         —         —         (2     (233     (1,777     (140     (2,152     161        (1,991
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

    —         —         11,543        (2     (233     (1,777     (140     9,391        400        9,791   

Increase in share of non-controlling interest

    —         —         —         —          —          —          —          —          515        515   

Dividends declared

    —          —          (5,950     —          —          —          —          (5,950     (52     (6,002

Acquisition of Grupo Yoli

    19        8,002        —          —          —          —          —          8,021       —          8,021   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balances at December 31, 2013

    2,048        41,490        70,094        —          (368     242        (395     113,111        4,042        117,153   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

    —          —          10,542        —          —          —          —          10,542        424        10,966   

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

    —          —          —          —          220        (11,973     (171     (11,924     (47     (11,971
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

    —          —          10,542        —          220        (11,973     (171     (1,382     377        (1,005

Dividends declared

    —          —          (6,012     —          —          —          —          (6,012     (18     (6,030
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balances at December 31, 2014

    2,048        41,490        74,624        —          (148     (11,731     (566     105,717        4,401        110,118   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

    —          —          10,235        —          —          —          —          10,235        94        10,329   

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

    —          —          —          —          (77     (4,853     132        (4,798     (498     (5,296
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income

    —          —          10,235        —          (77     (4,853     132        5,437        (404     5,033   

Dividends declared

    —          —          (6,405     —          —          —          —          (6,405     (11     (6,416
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balances at December 31, 2015

  Ps. 2,048      Ps. 41,490      Ps. 78,454      Ps. —        Ps. (225   Ps. (16,584   Ps. (434   Ps. 104,749      Ps. 3,986      Ps. 108,735   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements of changes in equity.

 

F-5


Table of Contents

COCA-COLA FEMSA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

Amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars ($) and in millions of Mexican pesos (Ps.)

 

     2015  (*)     2015     2014     2013  

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Income before income taxes

   $ 865      Ps.  14,880      Ps.  14,827      Ps.  17,513   

Adjustments for:

        

Non-cash operating expenses

     84        1,435        438        (42

Depreciation

     367        6,310        6,072        6,371   

Amortization

     49        834        877        761   

(Loss) Gain on disposal of long-lived assets

     (13     (217     33        (27

Write-off of long-lived assets

     19        332        39        39   

Share of the (profit) loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes

     (10     (155     125        (289

Interest income

     (24     (414     (379     (654

Interest expense

     217        3,718        3,352        2,604   

Foreign exchange loss, net

     85        1,459        968        739   

Non-cash movements in post-employment and other non-current employee benefits obligations

     4        68        (27     216   

Monetary position loss, net

     2        33        312        393   

Market value loss on financial instruments

     180        3,096        2,460        1,053   

(Increase) decrease:

        

Accounts receivable and other current assets

     (59     (1,010     (777     (1,072

Other current financial assets

     (166     (2,849     (2,156     (3,094

Inventories

     (104     (1,784     (588     (623

Increase (decrease):

        

Suppliers and other accounts payable

     194        3,329        4,978        2,921   

Other liabilities

     14        249        (1,442     89   

Employee benefits paid

     (11     (193     (235     (127

Income taxes paid

     (344     (5,919     (4,471     (4,674
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows from operating activities

     1,349        23,202        24,406        22,097   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Investing activities:

        

Acquisition of Grupo Yoli, net of cash acquired (Note 4)

     —          —         —         (1,046

Acquisition of Companhia Fluminense de Refrigerantes, net of cash acquired (Note 4)

     —          —         —         (4,648 )

Acquisition of Grupo Spaipa, net of cash acquired (Note 4)

     —          —         —         (23,056 )

Interest received

     24        414        379        654   

Acquisitions of long-lived assets

     (614     (10,545     (10,862     (10,615

Proceeds from the sale of long-lived assets

     14        233        147        195   

Acquisition of intangible assets

     (56     (956     (634     (1,256

Other non-current assets

     (4     (72     (257     (734

Investment in shares Coca-Cola FEMSA Philippines, Inc. (Note 9)

     —          —         —         (8,904

Dividends received from investments in associates and joint ventures (Note 9)

     1        13        148        —    

Investment in shares

     (2     (32     (58     (71
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows used in investing activities

     (637     (10,945     (11,137     (49,481
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financing activities:

        

Proceeds from borrowings

     111        1,907        6,180        66,748   

Repayment of borrowings

     (519     (8,931     (6,254     (36,744

Interest paid

     (208     (3,568     (3,182     (2,328

Dividends paid

     (373     (6,416     (6,030     (6,002

Increase in shares of non-controlling interest

     —         —         —         515   

Other financing activities

     500        8,586        (1,828     1,546   

Payments under finance leases

     (9     (145 )     (236     (229
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows (used in) / from financing activities

     (498     (8,567     (11,350     23,506   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     214        3,690        1,919        (3,878

Initial balance of cash and cash equivalents

     754        12,958        15,306        23,222   

Effects of exchange rate changes and inflation effects on cash and cash equivalents held in foreign currencies

     (38     (659     (4,267     (4,038
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance of cash and cash equivalents

   $ 930      Ps. 15,989      Ps.  12,958      Ps.  15,306   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(*) Convenience translation to U.S. dollars ($) – See Note 2.2.3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements of cash flow.

 

F-6


Table of Contents

COCA-COLA FEMSA, S.A.B. DE C.V. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Statements

As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013

Amounts expressed in millions of U.S. dollars ($) and in millions of Mexican pesos (Ps.)

Note 1. Activities of the Company

Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. (“Coca-Cola FEMSA”) is a Mexican corporation, mainly engaged in acquiring, holding and transferring all types of bonds, shares and marketable securities.

Coca-Cola FEMSA is indirectly owned by Fomento Economico Mexicano, S.A.B. de C.V. (“FEMSA”), which holds 47.9% of its capital stock and 63% of its voting shares and The Coca-Cola Company (“TCCC”), which indirectly owns 28.1% of its capital stock and 37% of its voting shares. The remaining 24% of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s shares trade on the Bolsa Mexicana de Valores, S.A.B. de C.V. (BMV: KOF). Its American Depositary shares (“ADS”) (equivalent to ten series “L” shares) trade on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. The address of its registered office and principal place of business is Mario Pani No. 100 Col. Santa Fe Cuajimalpa Delegacion Cuajimalpa de Morelos, Mexico City 05348, Mexico.

Coca-Cola FEMSA and its subsidiaries (the “Company”), as an economic unit, are engaged in the production, distribution and marketing of certain Coca-Cola trademark beverages in Mexico, Central America (Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama), Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil and Argentina.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 the most significant subsidiaries which the Company controls are:

 

Company

  

Activity

   Country    Ownership
percentage
2015
    Ownership
percentage
2014
 

Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V.

  

Manufacturing and distribution

   Mexico      100.00     100.00

Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V.

  

Holding

   Mexico      100.00     100.00

Spal Industria Brasileira de Bebidas, S.A.

  

Manufacturing and distribution

   Brazil      96.06     96.06

Distribuidora y Manufacturera del Valle de México, S. de R.L. de C.V.

  

Manufacturing and distribution

   Mexico      100.00     100.00

Servicios Refresqueros del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V.

  

Manufacturing and distribution

   Mexico      100.00     100.00

Coca-Cola FEMSA de Argentina, S.A.

  

Manufacturing and distribution

   Argentina      100.00     100.00

Note 2. Basis of Preparation

2.1 Statement of compliance

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”).

The Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes were authorized for issuance by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer John Santa Maria Otazua and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez on February 19, 2016. Those consolidated financial statements and notes were then approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on February 22, 2016 and by the Shareholders on March 7, 2016. The accompanying consolidated financial statements were approved for issuance in the Company’s annual report on Form 20-F by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer on April 15, 2016, and subsequent events have been considered through that date (See Note 28).

2.2 Basis of measurement and presentation

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the historical cost basis except for the following:

 

 

Derivative financial instruments

 

 

Trust assets of post-employment and other non-current employee benefit plans

The financial statements of subsidiaries whose functional currency is the currency of a hyperinflationary economy are stated in terms of the measuring unit current at the end of the reporting period.

 

F-7


Table of Contents

2.2.1 Presentation of consolidated income statement

The Company classifies its costs and expenses by function in the consolidated income statement in order to conform to the industry practices of the Company.

2.2.2 Presentation of consolidated statements of cash flows.

The Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows is presented using the indirect method.

2.2.3 Convenience translation to U.S. dollars ($)

The consolidated financial statements are stated in millions of Mexican pesos (“Ps.”) and rounded to the nearest million unless stated otherwise. However, solely for the convenience of the readers, the consolidated statement of financial position as of December 31, 2015, the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015 were converted into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate of Ps. 17.20 per U.S. dollar as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York as of that date. This arithmetic conversion should not be construed as representations that the amounts expressed in Mexican pesos may be converted into U.S. dollars at that or any other exchange rate. As explained in Note 2.1 above, as of February 22, 2016 (the issuance date of these financial statements) such exchange rate was Ps. 18.06 per U.S. dollar, a devaluation of 4.94% since December 31, 2015.

2.3 Critical accounting judgments and estimates

In the application of the Company’s accounting policies, which are described in Note 3, management is required to make judgments, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects only that period or in the period of the revision and future periods if the revision affects both current and future periods.

2.3.1 Key sources of estimation uncertainty

The following are the key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period, that have a significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year. Existing circumstances and assumptions about future developments, however, may change due to market changes or circumstances arising beyond the control of the Company. Such changes are reflected in the assumptions when they occur.

2.3.1.1 Impairment of indefinite lived intangible assets, goodwill and other depreciable long-lived assets

Intangible assets with indefinite lives as well as goodwill are subject to annual impairment tests. Impairment exists when the carrying value of an asset or cash generating unit (CGU) exceeds its recoverable amount, which is the higher of its fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. The fair value less costs to sell calculation is based on available data from binding sales transactions in arm’s length transactions of similar assets or observable market prices less incremental costs for disposing of the asset. In order to determine whether such assets are impaired, the Company initially calculates an estimation of the value in use of the cash-generating units to which such assets have been allocated. The value in use calculation requires management to estimate the future cash flows expected to arise from the cash-generating unit and a suitable discount rate in order to calculate present value. The Company reviews annually the carrying value of its intangible assets with indefinite lives and goodwill for impairment based on recognized valuation techniques. While the Company believes that its estimates are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such estimates could materially affect its evaluations. Impairment losses are recognized in current earnings in the period the related impairment is determined.

The Company assesses at each reporting date whether there is an indication that an asset may be impaired. If any indication exists, or when annual impairment testing for an asset is required, the Company estimates the asset’s recoverable amount. When the carrying amount of an asset or CGU exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. In determining fair value less costs to sell, recent market transactions are taken into account, if available. If no such transactions can be identified, an appropriate valuation model is used. These calculations are corroborated by valuation multiples or other available fair value indicators. The key assumptions used to determine the recoverable amount for the Company’s CGUs, including a sensitivity analysis, are further explained in Notes 3.16 and 11.

 

F-8


Table of Contents

2.3.1.2 Useful lives of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets with defined useful lives

Property, plant and equipment, including returnable bottles are expected to provide benefits over a period of more than one year, as well as intangible assets with defined useful lives are depreciated/amortized over their estimated useful lives. The Company bases it estimates on the experience of its technical personnel as well as based on its experience in the industry for similar assets, see Notes 3.12, 10 and 11.

2.3.1.3 Post-employment and other non-current employee benefits

The Company regularly evaluates the reasonableness of the assumptions used in its post-employment and other non-current employee benefit computations. Information about such assumptions is described in Note 15.

2.3.1.4 Income taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities. The Company regularly reviews its deferred tax assets for recoverability, and records a deferred tax asset based on its judgment regarding the probability of historical taxable income, projected future taxable income and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences, see Note 23.

2.3.1.5 Tax, labor and legal contingencies and provisions

The Company is subject to various claims and contingencies related to tax, labor and legal proceedings as described in Note 24. Due to their nature, such legal proceedings involve inherent uncertainties including, but not limited to, court rulings, negotiations between affected parties and governmental actions. Management periodically assesses the probability of loss for such contingencies and accrues a provision and/ or discloses the relevant circumstances, as appropriate. If the potential loss of any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated, the Company accrues a provision for the estimated loss.

2.3.1.6 Valuation of financial instruments

The Company is required to measure all derivative financial instruments at fair value.

The fair values of derivative financial instruments are determined considering quoted prices in recognized markets. If such instruments are not traded, fair value is determined by applying techniques based upon technical models supported by sufficient, reliable and verifiable data, recognized in the financial sector. The Company bases its forward price curves upon market price quotations. Management believes that the chosen valuation techniques and assumptions used are appropriate in determining the fair value of financial instruments, see Note 19.

2.3.1.7 Business combinations

Acquisitions of businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method. The consideration transferred in a business combination is measured at fair value, which is calculated as the sum of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets transferred by the Company, liabilities assumed by the Company to the former owners of the acquiree and the equity interests issued by the Company in exchange for control of the acquiree.

At the acquisition date, the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed are recognized at their fair value, except that:

 

 

deferred tax assets or liabilities, and assets or liabilities related to employee benefit arrangements are recognized and measured in accordance with IAS 12, Income Taxes and IAS 19, Employee Benefits, respectively;

 

 

liabilities or equity instruments related to share-based payment arrangements of the acquiree or share-based payment arrangements of the Company entered into to replace share-based payment arrangements of the acquiree are measured in accordance with IFRS 2, Share-based Payment at the acquisition date, see Note 3.24; and

 

 

assets (or disposal groups) that are classified as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5, Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations are measured in accordance with that standard.

 

F-9


Table of Contents

Goodwill is measured as the excess of the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree, and the fair value of the Company previously held equity interest in the acquiree (if any) over the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. If, after reassessment, the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed exceeds the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree and the fair value of the Company previously held interest in the acquiree (if any), the excess is recognized immediately in profit or loss as a bargain purchase gain.

For each business combination, the Company elects whether it measures the non-controlling interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquiree’s identifiable net assets.

2.3.1.8 Investments in associates

If the Company holds, directly or indirectly, 20 per cent or more of the voting power of the investee, it is presumed that it has significant influence, unless it can be clearly demonstrated that this is not the case. If the Company holds, directly or indirectly, less than 20 per cent of the voting power of the investee, it is presumed that the Company does not have significant influence, unless such influence can be clearly demonstrated. Decisions regarding the propriety of utilizing the equity method of accounting for a less than 20 per cent-owned corporate investee requires a careful evaluation of voting rights and their impact on the Company’s ability to exercise significant influence. Management considers the existence of the following circumstances, which may indicate that the Company is in a position to exercise significant influence over a less than 20 per cent-owned corporate investee:

 

 

representation on the board of directors or equivalent governing body of the investee;

 

 

participation in policy-making processes, including participation in decisions about dividends or other distributions;

 

 

material transactions between the Company and the investee;

 

 

interchange of managerial personnel; or

 

 

provision of essential technical information.

Management also considers the existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or currently convertible when assessing whether the Company has significant influence.

In addition, the Company evaluates the indicators that provide evidence of significant influence:

 

 

the Company’s extent of ownership is significant relative to other shareholdings (i.e. a lack of concentration of other shareholders);

 

 

the Company’s significant shareholders, its parent, fellow subsidiaries, or officers of the Company, hold additional investment in the investee; and

 

 

the Company is a part of significant investee committees, such as the executive committee or the finance committee.

2.3.1.9 Joint Arrangements

An arrangement can be a joint arrangement even though not all of its parties have joint control of the arrangement. When the Company is a party to an arrangement it shall assess whether the contractual arrangement gives all the parties, or a group of the parties, control of the arrangement collectively; joint control exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties that control the arrangement collectively. Management needs to apply judgment when assessing whether all the parties, or a group of the parties, have joint control of an arrangement. When assessing joint control, management considers the following facts and circumstances:

 

a) If all the parties, or a group of the parties, control the arrangement, considering definition of joint control, as described in Note 3.1; and

 

b) If decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of all the parties, or of a group of the parties

As mentioned in Note 9, the Company accounts for its 51% investment at Coca-Cola FEMSA Philippines, Inc. (CCFPI) as a joint venture, this is based on the facts that the Company and TCCC: (i) during the initial four-year period all decisions are taken jointly by the Company and TCCC; and (ii) potential voting rights to acquire the remaining 49% of CCFPI are not probable to be executed in the foreseeable future due to the fact the call option was “out of the money” as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

 

F-10


Table of Contents

2.3.1.10 Venezuela Exchange Rates and Consolidation

As is further explained in Note 3.3 below, the exchange rate used to account for foreign currency denominated monetary items arising in Venezuela, and also the exchange rate used to translate the financial statements of the Company’s Venezuelan subsidiary for group reporting purposes are both key sources of estimation uncertainty in preparing the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

As is also explained in Note 3.3 below, the Company believes that it currently controls its subsidiary operations in Venezuela but recognizes the challenging economic and political environment in Venezuela. Should the Company in the future conclude that it no longer controls such operations, its consolidated financial statements would change by material amounts as further explained below.

2.4 Changes in accounting policies

The Company has applied the following amendments to IFRS during 2015:

Amendments to IAS 1 Disclosure Initiative

The amendments to IAS 1 “Presentation of Financial Statements” clarify, rather than significantly change, existing IAS 1 requirements, such as:

 

 

The materiality requirements in IAS 1;

 

 

That specific line items in the statement(s) of profit or loss and OCI and the statement of financial position may be disaggregated;

 

 

That entities have flexibility as to the order in which they present the notes to financial statements; and

 

 

That the share of OCI of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method must be classified as either those items that will be subsequently reclassified to profit or loss and those that will not, and be presented as a single line item within each of those categories.

Furthermore, the amendments clarify the requirements that apply when additional subtotals are presented in the statement of financial position and the statement(s) of profit or loss and OCI. These amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted these amendments and has not impact on the Company´s consolidated financial statements.

Annual Improvements 2010-2012 Cycle

These improvements are effective from July 1, 2014 and the Company has applied these amendments for the first time during the 2015. They include:

IFRS 2 Share-based Payment

This improvement is applied prospectively and clarifies various issues relating to the definitions of performance and service conditions which are vesting conditions, including:

 

 

A performance condition must contain a service condition

 

 

A performance target must be met while the counterparty is rendering service

 

 

A performance target may relate to the operations or activities of an entity, or to those of another entity in the same group

 

 

A performance condition may be a market or non-market condition

 

 

If the counterparty, regardless of the reason, ceases to provide service during the vesting period, the service condition is not satisfied

The above definitions are consistent with how the Company has identified any performance and service conditions which are vesting conditions in previous periods, and thus these amendments do not impact the Company’s accounting policies.

IFRS 8 Operating Segments

The amendments clarify that:

 

 

An entity must disclose the judgements made by management in applying the aggregation criteria in paragraph 12 of IFRS 8, including a brief description of operating segments that have been aggregated and the economic characteristics (e.g., sales and gross margins) used to assess whether the segments are ‘similar’.

 

 

The reconciliation of segment assets to total assets is only required to be disclosed if the reconciliation is reported to the chief operating decision maker, similar to the required disclosure for segment liabilities.

 

F-11


Table of Contents

The Company has applied the aggregation criteria in IFRS 8.12 and is disclosed in Note 25.

IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment and IAS 38 Intangible Assets

The amendment is applied retrospectively and clarifies in IAS 16 and IAS 38 that the asset may be revalued by reference to observable data by either adjusting the gross carrying amount of the asset to market value or by determining the market value of the carrying value and adjusting the gross carrying amount proportionately so that the resulting carrying amount equals the market value. In addition, the accumulated depreciation or amortization is the difference between the gross and carrying amounts of the asset. The Company did not record any revaluation adjustments during the current period.

Note 3. Significant Accounting Policies

3.1 Basis of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements comprise the financial statements of the Company as at December 31, 2015. Control is achieved when the Company is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the investee.

Specifically, the Company controls an investee if and only if the Company has:

 

 

Power over the investee (i.e. existing rights that give it the current ability to direct the relevant activities of the investee)

 

 

Exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the investee, and

 

 

The ability to use its power over the investee to affect its returns

When the Company has less than a majority of the voting or similar rights of an investee, the Company considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether it has power over an investee, including:

 

 

The contractual arrangement with the other vote holders of the investee

 

 

Rights arising from other contractual arrangements

 

 

The Company’s voting rights and potential voting rights

The Company re-assesses whether or not it controls an investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to one or more of the three elements of control. Consolidation of a subsidiary begins when the Company obtains control over the subsidiary and ceases when the Company loses control of the subsidiary. Assets, liabilities, income and expenses of a subsidiary acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated financial statements of income and comprehensive income from the date the Company gains control until the date the Company ceases to control the subsidiary.

Profit or loss and each component of other comprehensive income (OCI) are attributed to the equity holders of the parent of the Company and to the non-controlling interests, even if this results in the non-controlling interests having a deficit balance. When necessary adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring their accounting policies into line with the Company’s accounting policies. All intra-group assets and liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows relating to transactions between members of the Company are eliminated in full on consolidation.

A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction. If the Company loses control over a subsidiary, it:

 

 

Derecognizes the assets (including goodwill) and liabilities of the subsidiary

 

 

Derecognizes the carrying amount of any non-controlling interests

 

 

Derecognizes the cumulative translation differences recorded in equity

 

 

Recognizes the fair value of the consideration received

 

 

Recognizes the fair value of any investment retained

 

 

Recognizes any surplus or deficit in profit or loss

 

 

Reclassifies the parent’s share of components previously recognized in OCI to profit or loss or retained earnings, as appropriate, as would be required if the Company had directly disposed of the related assets or liabilities

 

F-12


Table of Contents

3.2 Business combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method at the acquisition date, which is the date on which control is transferred to the Company. In assessing control, the Company takes into consideration substantive potential voting rights.

The Company measures goodwill at the acquisition date as the fair value of the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any previously- held equity interest in the acquiree and the recognized amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquiree (if any), less the net recognized amount of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. If after reassessment, the excess is negative, a bargain purchase gain is recognized in consolidated net income at the time of the acquisition.

Costs related to the acquisition, other than those associated with the issue of debt or equity securities, that the Company incurs in connection with a business combination are expensed as incurred.

Any contingent consideration payable is recognized at fair value at the acquisition date. If the contingent consideration is classified as equity, it is not remeasured and settlement is accounted for within equity. Otherwise, if after reassessment subsequent changes to the fair value of the contingent considerations are recognized in consolidated net income.

If the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs, the Company reports provisional amounts for the items for which the accounting is incomplete, and discloses that its allocation is preliminary in nature. Those provisional amounts are adjusted during the measurement period (not greater than 12 months), or additional assets or liabilities are recognized, to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the amounts recognized at that date.

3.3 Foreign currencies and consolidation of foreign subsidiaries, investments in associates and joint ventures

In preparing the financial statements of each individual subsidiary, associate and joint venture, transactions in currencies other than the individual entity’s functional currency (foreign currencies) are recognized at the rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. At the end of each reporting period, monetary items denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing at that date. Non-monetary items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are not remeasured.

Exchange differences on monetary items are recognized in profit or loss in the period in which they arise except for:

 

 

The variations in the net investment in foreign subsidiaries generated by exchange rate fluctuation are included in the cumulative translation adjustment, which is recorded in equity as part of the cumulative translation adjustment within the cumulative other comprehensive income.

 

 

Intercompany financing balances with foreign subsidiaries that are considered as non-current investments, since there is no plan to pay such financing in the foreseeable future. Monetary position and exchange rate fluctuation regarding this financing is included in the cumulative translation adjustment, which is recorded in equity as part of the cumulative translation adjustment within the cumulative other comprehensive income.

 

 

Exchange differences on transactions entered into in order to hedge certain foreign currency risks.

Foreign exchange differences on monetary items are recognized in profit or loss. Their classification in the income statement depends on their nature. Differences arising from fluctuations related to operating activities are presented in the “other expenses” line (see Note 18) while fluctuations related to non-operating activities such as financing activities are presented as part of “foreign exchange gain (loss)” line in the income statement.

For incorporation into the Company’s consolidated financial statements, each foreign subsidiary, associate or joint venture’s individual financial statements are translated into Mexican pesos, as described as follows:

 

 

For hyperinflationary economic environments, the inflation effects of the origin country are recognized, and subsequently translated into Mexican pesos using the year-end exchange rate for the consolidated statements of financial position and consolidated income statement and comprehensive income; and

 

 

For non-inflationary economic environments, assets and liabilities are translated into Mexican pesos using the year-end exchange rate, equity is translated into Mexican pesos using the historical exchange rate, and the income statement and comprehensive income is translated using the exchange rate at the date of each transaction. The Company uses the average exchange rate of each month only if the exchange rate does not fluctuate significantly.

 

F-13


Table of Contents
          Exchange Rates of Local Currencies Translated to Mexican  Pesos  

Country or Zone

   Functional/
Currency
   Average Exchange
Rate for
    Exchange Rate as of  
      2015     2014     2013     2015     2014  

Mexico

   Mexican peso    Ps.  1.00      Ps.  1.00      Ps.  1.00      Ps.  1.00      Ps.  1.00   

Guatemala

   Quetzal      2.07        1.72        1.62        2.25        1.94   

Costa Rica

   Colon      0.03        0.02        0.03        0.03        0.03   

Panama

   U.S. dollar      15.85        13.30        12.77        17.21        14.72   

Colombia

   Colombian peso      0.01        0.01        0.01        0.01        0.01   

Nicaragua

   Cordoba      0.58        0.51        0.52        0.62        0.55   

Argentina (b)

   Argentine peso      1.71        1.64        2.34        1.32        1.72   

Venezuela (a)

   Bolivar           (a)            (a)            (a)            (a)            (a)  

Brazil

   Reais      4.81        5.66        5.94        4.41        5.54   

Philippines

   Philippines peso      0.35        0.30        0.30        0.36        0.33   

 

(a) Venezuela

The Company has operated under exchange controls in Venezuela since 2003, which limit its ability to remit dividends abroad or make payments other than in local currency and that may increase the real price paid for raw materials and services purchased in local currency. Cash balances of the Company’s Venezuelan subsidiary which are not available for use at the time the Company prepares its consolidated financial statements are disclosed in Note 5.

The exchange rate used by the Company for its Venezuelan operations depends on the type of the transaction as explained below.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the companies in Venezuela were able to convert bolivars to US dollars at one of the following legal exchange rates:

 

i) The official exchange rate. Used for transactions involving what the Venezuelan government considers to be “essential goods and services”. Certain of the Company’s concentrate purchases from The Coca-Cola Company and other strategic suppliers qualify for such treatment. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the official exchange rate was 6.30 bolivars per U.S. dollar.

 

ii) SICAD. Used for certain transactions, including payment of services and payments related to foreign investments in Venezuela, determined by the state-run system known as Sistema Complementario de Administración de Divisas or SICAD exchange rate. The SICAD determined this alternative exchange rate based on limited periodic sales of U.S. dollars through auctions. As of December 31, 2015 the SICAD exchange rate was 13.50 bolivars per U.S. dollar (Ps.1.27 per bolivar) and as of December 31, 2014 the SICAD exchange rate was 12.00 bolivars per U.S. dollar (Ps.1.23 per bolivar).

 

iii) SICAD II. The Venezuelan government enacted a new law in 2014 that authorized an additional method of exchanging Venezuelan bolivars to U.S. dollars. During 2014 and part of 2015 SICAD-II was used for certain types of transactions not covered by the official exchange rate or the SICAD exchange rate. The SICAD-II exchange rate as of December 31, 2014 was 49.99 bolivars per US dollar (Ps. 0.29 per bolivar). In February 2015, this exchange rate was eliminated.

 

iv) SIMADI. In February 2015, the Venezuelan government enacted a new market-based exchange rate determined by the system known as the Sistema Marginal de Divisas , or SIMADI. The SIMADI determines the exchange rates based on supply and demand of U.S. dollars. The SIMADI exchange rate as of December 31, 2015 was 198.70 bolivars per US dollar (Ps. 0.09 per bolivar).

The Company’s recognition of its Venezuelan operations involves a two-step accounting process in order to translate into bolivars all transactions in a different currency than bolivars and then to translate them to Mexican Pesos.

Step-one: Transactions are first recorded in the stand-alone accounts of the Venezuelan subsidiary in its functional currency, which are bolivars. Any non-bolivar denominated monetary assets or liabilities are translated into bolivars at each balance sheet date using the exchange rate at which the Company expects them to be settled, with the corresponding effect of such translation being recorded in the income statement.

As of December 31, 2014 the Company had US$449 million in monetary liabilities recorded using the official exchange rate, as the Company believes that such items qualify as essential goods and services as explained above. As of December 31, 2015 the Company had US$418.5 million in monetary liabilities recorded using the official exchange rate and US$138.7 recorded at SICAD.

 

F-14


Table of Contents

The Company believes that account payables for imports of essential goods should continue to qualify as transactions that may be settled using the official exchange rate, as they were recorded, but also recognizes the current illiquidity of the U.S. dollar market in Venezuela. If there is a change in the official exchange rate used in the future, or should the Company determine these amounts no longer qualify, the Company may need to recognize a portion of the impact of this change in the income statement.

Step-two: In order to integrate the results of the Venezuelan operations into the consolidated figures of the Company, such Venezuelan results are translated from Venezuelan bolivars into Mexican pesos. During 2015, the Company used SIMADI exchange rate based on the expectations that this would have been the exchange rate to what dividends will be settled. During 2014, the Company decided to use the SICAD II exchange rate to better reflect the economic conditions in Venezuela at the time. Prior to 2014, the Company used the official exchange rate (6.30 bolivars per U.S. dollar).

 

(b) Argentina

Official exchange rates for Argentina are published by the Argentine Central Bank. The Argentine peso has experienced significant devaluation over the past several years and the government has adopted various rules and regulations since late 2011 that established new restrictive controls on capital flows into the country. These enhanced exchange controls have practically closed the foreign exchange market to retail transactions. It is widely reported that the Argentine peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate in the unofficial market substantially differs from the official foreign exchange rate. The Argentine government could impose further exchange controls or restrictions on the movement of capital and take other measures in the future in response to capital flight or a significant depreciation of the Argentine peso.

 

(c) Other Matters

On the disposal of a foreign operation (i.e. a disposal of the Company’s entire interest in a foreign operation, or a disposal involving loss of control over a subsidiary that includes a foreign operation, a disposal involving loss of joint control over a joint venture that includes a foreign operation, or a disposal involving loss of significant influence over an associate that includes a foreign operation), all of the exchange differences accumulated in other comprehensive income in respect of that operation attributable to the owners of the Company are recognized in the consolidated income statement. The Company continues to monitor all of its foreign operations, but most notably its Venezuela operations for the reasons explained herein. Over the past few years, the Company has accumulated significant amounts of accumulated other comprehensive loss (approximating Ps. 15,536 million) related to such Venezuela operations. To the extent that economic and or operational conditions were to worsen in the future resulting in a conclusion that the Company no longer controls such operations, such would involve both deconsolidation and an income statement charge for accumulated amounts. There can be no assurances that such might not happen in the future.

In addition, in relation to a partial disposal of a subsidiary that does not result in the Company losing control over the subsidiary, the proportionate share of accumulated exchange differences are re-attributed to non-controlling interests and are not recognized in profit or loss. For all other partial disposals (i.e., partial disposals of associates or joint ventures that do not result in the Company losing significant influence or joint control), the proportionate share of the accumulated exchange differences is reclassified to profit or loss.

Goodwill and fair value adjustments on identifiable assets and liabilities acquired arising on the acquisition of a foreign operation are treated as assets and liabilities of the foreign operation and translated at the rate of exchange prevailing at the end of each reporting period. Foreign exchange differences are recognized in equity as part of the cumulative translation adjustment.

The translation of assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies into Mexican pesos is for consolidation purposes and does not indicate that the Company could realize or settle the reported value of those assets and liabilities in Mexican pesos. Additionally, this does not indicate that the Company could return or distribute the reported Mexican peso value equity to its shareholders.

3.4 Recognition of the effects of inflation in countries with hyperinflationary economic environments

The Company recognizes the effects of inflation on the financial information of its Venezuelan subsidiary that operates in hyperinflationary economic environments (when cumulative inflation of the three preceding years is approaching, or exceeds, 100% or more in addition to other qualitative factors), which consists of:

 

 

Using inflation factors to restate non-monetary assets, such as inventories, property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, including related costs and expenses when such assets are consumed or depreciated.

 

 

Applying the appropriate inflation factors to restate capital stock, additional paid-in capital, net income, retained earnings and items of other comprehensive income by the necessary amount to maintain the purchasing power equivalent in the currency of the corresponding hyperinflationary country on the dates such capital was contributed or income was generated up to the date of these consolidated financial statements are presented; and

 

 

Including the monetary position gain or loss in consolidated net income.

 

F-15


Table of Contents

The Company restates the financial information of subsidiaries that operate in hyperinflationary economic environment using the consumer price index of each country.

As of December 31, 2015, 2014, and 2013, the operations of the Company are classified as follows:

 

Country

   Cumulative
Inflation
2013- 2015
    Type of Economy    Cumulative
Inflation
2012- 2014
    Type of Economy    Cumulative
Inflation
2011- 2013
    Type of Economy

Mexico

     10.5   Non-hyperinflationary      12.4   Non-hyperinflationary      12.2   Non-hyperinflationary

Guatemala

     10.8   Non-hyperinflationary      11.5   Non-hyperinflationary      14.8   Non-hyperinflationary

Costa Rica

     8.1   Non-hyperinflationary      14.6   Non-hyperinflationary      13.1   Non-hyperinflationary

Panama

     5.1   Non-hyperinflationary      9.7   Non-hyperinflationary      15.2   Non-hyperinflationary

Colombia

     12.8   Non-hyperinflationary      8.1   Non-hyperinflationary      7.8   Non-hyperinflationary

Nicaragua

     15.8   Non-hyperinflationary      21.9   Non-hyperinflationary      20.7   Non-hyperinflationary

Argentina

     59.2   Non-hyperinflationary      52.6   Non-hyperinflationary      34.0   Non-hyperinflationary

Venezuela

     562.9   Hyperinflationary      210.2   Hyperinflationary      139.3   Hyperinflationary

Brazil

     24.7   Non-hyperinflationary      19.0   Non-hyperinflationary      18.9   Non-hyperinflationary

Philippines (equity method investment)

     8.3   Non-hyperinflationary      9.9   Non-hyperinflationary      11.3   Non-hyperinflationary

During 2014, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) issued a declaration of censurship and called on Argentina to adopt remedial measures to address the quality of its official inflation data. The IMF noted that alternative data sources have shown considerably higher inflation rates than the official data since 2008. Consumer price data reported by Argentina from January 2014 onwards reflect the new national Consumer Price Index (CPI) which means Indice de Precios al Consumidor Nacional Urbano (IPCNu), which differs substantively from the preceding CPI. Because of the differences in geographical coverage, weights, sampling, and methodology, the IPCNu data cannot be directly compared to the earlier CPI-GBA data.

3.5 Cash and cash equivalents

Cash is measured at nominal value and consists of non-interest bearing bank deposits. Cash equivalents consist principally of short-term bank deposits and fixed rate investments, both with maturities of three months or less at the acquisition date and are recorded at acquisition cost plus interest income not yet received, which is similar to market prices.

The Company also maintains restricted cash held as collateral to meet certain contractual obligations (see Note 8). Restricted cash is presented within other current financial assets given that the restrictions are short-term in nature.

3.6 Financial assets

Financial assets are classified into the following specified categories: “fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)”, “held-to-maturity investments”, “available-for-sale” and “loans and receivables”. The classification depends on the nature and purpose of holding the financial assets and is determined at the time of initial recognition.

When a financial asset is recognized initially, the Company measures it at its fair value plus, in the case of a financial asset not at fair value through profit or loss, transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the financial asset.

The fair value of an asset is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest.

The Company’s financial assets include cash and cash equivalents, loans and receivables, derivative financial instruments and other financial assets (Current and non-current).

3.6.1 Effective interest rate method (EIR)

The effective interest rate method is a method of calculating the amortized cost of loans and receivables and other financial assets (designated as held to maturity) and of allocating interest income/expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash receipts (including all fees on points paid or received that form an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life of the financial asset, or (where appropriate) a shorter period, to the net carrying amount on initial recognition.

 

F-16


Table of Contents

3.6.2. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL)

Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL) include financial assets held for trading and financial assets designated upon initial recognition at fair value through profit or loss. Financial assets are classified as held for trading if they are acquired for the purpose of selling or repurchasing in the near term. Derivatives, including separated embedded derivatives are also classified as held for trading unless they are designated as effective hedging instruments as defined by IAS 39. Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss are carried in the statement of financial position at fair value with net changes in fair value presented as finance costs (negative net changes in fair value) or finance income (positive net changes in fair value) in the statement of profit or loss.

3.6.3 Loans and receivables

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial instruments with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market. Loans and receivables with a relevant period (including trade and other receivables) are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment.

Interest income is recognized by applying the effective interest rate, except for short-term receivables when the recognition of interest would be immaterial. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 the interest income on loans and receivables recognized in the interest income line item within the consolidated income statements is Ps. -, Ps. - and Ps. 61, respectively.

3.6.4 Other financial assets

Other financial assets are non-current accounts receivable and derivative financial instruments. Other financial assets with a relevant period are measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment.

3.6.5 Impairment of financial assets

Financial assets, other than those at FVTPL, are assessed for indicators of impairment at the end of each reporting period. Financial assets are considered to be impaired when there is objective evidence that, as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the financial asset, (an incurred “loss event”) and that loss event has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial assets that can be reliably estimated.

Evidence of impairment may include indicators as follows:

 

 

Significant financial difficulty of the issuer or counterparty; or

 

 

Default or delinquent in interest or principal payments; or

 

 

It becoming probable that the borrower will enter bankruptcy or financial re-organization; or

 

 

The disappearance of an active market for that financial asset because of financial difficulties.

For financial assets carried at amortized cost, the amount of the impairment loss recognized is the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate.

The carrying amount of the financial asset is reduced by the impairment loss directly for all financial assets with the exception of trade receivables, where the carrying amount is reduced through the use of an allowance for doubtful accounts. When a trade receivable is considered uncollectible, it is written off against the allowance account. Subsequent recoveries of amounts previously written off are credited against the allowance account. Changes in the carrying amount of the allowance account are recognized in consolidated net income.

3.6.6 Derecognition

A financial asset (or, where applicable, a part of a financial asset or part of a group of similar financial assets) is derecognized when:

 

 

The rights to receive cash flows from the financial asset have expired, or

 

 

The Company has transferred its rights to receive cash flows from the asset or has assumed an obligation to pay the received cash flows in full without material delay to a third party under a ‘pass-through’ arrangement; and either (a) the Company has transferred substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, or (b) the Company has neither transferred nor retained substantially all the risks and rewards of the asset, but has transferred control of the asset.

 

F-17


Table of Contents

3.6.7 Offsetting of financial instruments

Financial assets are required to be offset against financial liabilities and the net amount reported in the consolidated statement of financial position if, and only when the Company:

 

 

Currently has an enforceable legal right to offset the recognized amounts, and

 

 

Intends to settle on a net basis, or to realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously.

3.7 Derivative financial instruments

The Company is exposed to different risks related to cash flows, liquidity, market and third party credit. As a result, the Company contracts different derivative financial instruments in order to reduce its exposure to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations between the Mexican peso and other currencies, and interest rate fluctuations associated with its borrowings denominated in foreign currencies and the exposure to the risk of fluctuation in the costs of certain raw materials.

The Company values and records all derivative financial instruments and hedging activities, in the consolidated statement of financial position as either an asset or liability measured at fair value, considering quoted prices in recognized markets. If such instruments are not traded in a formal market, fair value is determined by applying techniques based upon technical models supported by sufficient, reliable and verifiable market data, recognized in the financial sector. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments are recorded each year in current earnings or as a component of cumulative other comprehensive income based on the item being hedged and the effectiveness of the hedge.

3.7.1 Hedge accounting

The Company designates certain hedging instruments, which include derivatives to cover foreign currency risk, as either fair value hedges or cash flow hedges. Hedges of foreign exchange risk on firm commitments are accounted for as cash flow hedges.

At the inception of the hedge relationship, the Company documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, along with its risk management objectives and its strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions. Furthermore, at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, the Company documents whether the hedging instrument is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk.

3.7.2 Cash flow hedges

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges is recognized in other comprehensive income and accumulated under the heading valuation of the effective portion of derivative financial instruments. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in consolidated net income, and is included in the market value (gain) loss on financial instruments line item within the consolidated statements of income.

Amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity are reclassified to consolidated net income in the periods when the hedged item is recognized in consolidated net income, in the same line of the consolidated statement of income as the recognized hedged item. However, when the hedged forecast transaction results in the recognition of a non-financial asset or a non-financial liability, the gains and losses previously recognized in other comprehensive income and accumulated in equity are transferred from equity and included in the initial measurement of the cost of the non-financial asset or non-financial liability.

Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Company revokes the hedging relationship, when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or when it no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. Any gain or loss recognized in cumulative other comprehensive income in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognized when the forecast transaction is ultimately recognized in consolidated net income. When a forecast transaction is no longer expected to occur, the gain or loss accumulated in equity is recognized immediately in consolidated net income.

3.7.3 Fair value hedges

The change in the fair value of a hedging derivative is recognized in the statement of profit or loss as foreign exchange gain or loss. The change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk hedged is recorded as part of the carrying value of the hedged item and is also recognized in the statement of profit or loss as foreign exchange gain or loss.

For fair value hedges relating to items carried at amortized cost, any adjustment to carrying value is amortized through profit or loss over the remaining term of the hedge using the EIR method. EIR amortization may begin as soon as an adjustment exists and no later than when the hedged item ceases to be adjusted for changes in its fair value attributable to the risk being hedged. If the hedged item is derecognized, the unamortized fair value is recognized immediately in profit or loss.

 

F-18


Table of Contents

When an unrecognized firm commitment is designated as a hedged item, the subsequent cumulative change in the fair value of the firm commitment attributable to the hedged risk is recognized as an asset or liability with a corresponding gain or loss recognized in profit and loss.

3.8 Fair value measurement

The Company measures financial instruments, such as, derivatives, and non-financial assets such as trusts assets of labor obligations at fair value at each balance sheet date. Also, fair values of bank loans and notes payable carried at amortized cost are disclosed in Note 17.

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either:

 

 

In the principal market for the asset or liability, or

 

 

In the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability

A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant’s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use.

The Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs.

All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements are categorized within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:

 

 

Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

 

 

Level 2 : inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

 

 

Level 3: are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date.

For assets and liabilities that are recognized in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between Levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorization (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period

The Company determines the policies and procedures for both recurring fair value measurement, such as those described in Note 19 and unquoted liabilities such as debt described in Note 17.

For the purpose of fair value disclosures, the Company has determined classes of assets and liabilities on the basis of the nature, characteristics and risks of the asset or liability and the level of the fair value hierarchy as explained above.

3.9 Inventories and cost of goods sold

Inventories are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value represents the estimated selling price for inventories less all estimated costs of completion and costs necessary to make the sale.

Inventories represent the acquisition or production cost which is incurred when purchasing or producing a product, and are based on the weighted average cost formula.

Cost of goods sold is based on average cost of the inventories at the time of sale. Cost of goods sold includes expenses related to the purchase of raw materials used in the production process, as well as labor costs (wages and other benefits), depreciation of production facilities, equipment and other costs, including fuel, electricity, equipment maintenance and inspection.

 

F-19


Table of Contents

3.10 Other current assets

Other current assets, which will be realized within a period of less than one year from the reporting date, are comprised of prepaid assets and agreements with customers.

Prepaid assets principally consist of advances to suppliers of raw materials, advertising, promotional, leasing and insurance costs, and are recognized as other current assets at the time of the cash disbursement, and are unrecognized in the consolidated statement of financial position and recognized in the appropriate consolidated income statement caption when the risks and rewards of the related goods have been transferred to the Company or services have been received, respectively.

The Company has prepaid advertising costs which consist of television and radio advertising airtime paid in advance. These expenses are generally amortized over the period based on the transmission of the television and radio spots. The related production costs are recognized in consolidated net income as incurred.

The Company has agreements with customers for the right to sell and promote the Company’s products over a certain period. The majority of these agreements have terms of more than one year, and the related costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the term of the contract, with amortization presented as a reduction of net sales. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, such amortization aggregated to Ps. 317, Ps. 338 and Ps. 696, respectively.

3.11 Investments in associates and joint arrangements

3.11.1 Investments in associates

Associates are those entities over which the Company has significant influence. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee, but is not control over those policies. Upon loss of significant influence over the associate, the Company measures and recognises any retained investment at its fair value.

Investments in associates are accounted for using the equity method and initial recognition at cost, which comprises the investment’s purchase price and any directly attributable expenditure necessary to acquire it. The carrying amount of the investment is adjusted to recognise changes in the Company’s share of net assets of the associate since the acquisition date. The financial statements of the associates are prepared for the same reporting period as the Company.

When the Company’s share of losses exceeds the carrying amount of the associate, including any non-current investments, the carrying amount is reduced to nil and recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the extent that the Company has a legal or constructive obligation or has made payments on behalf of the associate.

Goodwill identified at the acquisition date is presented as part of the investment in shares of the associate in the consolidated statement of financial position.

After application of the equity method, the Company determines whether it is necessary to recognize an additional impairment loss on its investment in its associate. The Company determines at each reporting date whether there is any objective evidence that the investment in the associates is impaired. If this is the case, the Company calculates the amount of impairment as the difference between the recoverable amount of the associate and its carrying value and recognizes the amount in the share of the profit or loss of associates accounted for using the equity method in the consolidated statements of income.

3.11.2 Joint arrangements

A joint arrangement is an arrangement of which two or more parties have joint control. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. The Company classifies its interests in joint arrangements as either joint operations or joint ventures depending on the Company’s rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities of the arrangements

Joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. The Company recognizes its interest in the joint ventures as an investment and accounts for that investment using the equity method. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about the relevant activities require unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 the Company does not have an interest in joint operations.

After application of the equity method, the Company determines whether it is necessary to recognize an additional impairment loss on its investment in its joint venture. The Company determines at each reporting date whether there is any objective evidence that the investment in the joint ventures is impaired. If this is the case, the Company calculates the amount of impairment as the difference

 

F-20


Table of Contents

between the recoverable amount of the joint venture and its carrying value and recognizes the amount in the share of the profit or loss of joint ventures accounted for using the equity method in the consolidated statements of income.

Upon loss of joint control over the joint venture, the Company measures and recognises any retained investment at its fair value.

3.12 Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are initially recorded at their cost of acquisition and/or construction and are presented net of accumulated depreciation and/or accumulated impairment losses, if any. The borrowing costs related to the acquisition or construction of qualifying asset is capitalized as part of the cost of that asset.

Major maintenance costs are capitalized as part of total acquisition cost. Routine maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.

Investments in progress consist of long-lived assets not yet in service, in other words, that are not yet used for the purpose that they were bought, built or developed. The Company expects to complete those investments during the following 12 months.

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over acquisition cost. Where an item of property, plant and equipment comprises major components having different useful lives, they are accounted and depreciated for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment. The Company estimates depreciation rates, considering the estimated useful lives of the assets.

The estimated useful lives of the Company’s principal assets are as follows:

 

     Years  

Buildings

     40-50   

Machinery and equipment

     10-20   

Distribution equipment

     7-15   

Refrigeration equipment

     5-7   

Returnable bottles

     1.5-4   

Other equipment

     3-10   

The estimated useful lives, residual values and depreciation method are reviewed at the end of each reporting period, with the effect of any changes in estimate accounted for on a prospective basis.

An item of property, plant and equipment is derecognized upon disposal or when no future economic benefits are expected to arise from the continued use of the asset. Any gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an item of property, plant and equipment is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds (if any) and the carrying amount of the asset and is recognized in consolidated net income.

Returnable and non-returnable bottles:

The Company has two types of bottles: returnable and non-returnable.

 

 

Non-returnable: Are recorded in consolidated net income at the time of the sale of the product.

 

 

Returnable: Are classified as long-lived assets as a component of property, plant and equipment. Returnable bottles are recorded at acquisition cost; for countries with hyperinflationary economies, restated according to IAS 29. Depreciation of returnable bottles is computed using the straight-line method considering their estimated useful lives.

There are two types of returnable bottles:

 

 

Those that are in the Company’s control within its facilities, plants and distribution centers; and

 

 

Those that have been placed in the hands of customers and still belong to the Company.

Returnable bottles that have been placed in the hands of customers are subject to an agreement with a retailer pursuant to which the Company retains ownership. These bottles are monitored by sales personnel during periodic visits to retailers and the Company has the right to charge any breakage identified to the retailer. Bottles that are not subject to such agreements are expensed when placed in the hands of retailers.

The Company’s returnable bottles are depreciated according to their estimated useful lives (3 years for glass bottles and 1.5 years for PET bottles). Deposits received from customers are amortized over the same useful estimated lives of the bottles.

 

F-21


Table of Contents

3.13 Borrowing costs

Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets, which are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale, are added to the cost of those assets, until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale. Borrowing costs may include:

 

 

interest expense; and

 

 

exchange differences arising from foreign currency borrowings to the extent that they are regarded as an adjustment to interest costs.

Interest income earned on the temporary investment of specific borrowings pending their expenditure on qualifying assets is deducted from the borrowing costs eligible for capitalization.

All other borrowing costs are recognized in consolidated net income in the period in which they are incurred.

3.14 Intangible assets

Intangible assets are identifiable non-monetary assets without physical substance and represent payments whose benefits will be received in future years. Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value as at the date of acquisition (see Note 3.2). Following initial recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed as either finite or indefinite, in accordance with the period over which the Company expects to receive the benefits.

Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized and mainly consist of information technology and management system costs incurred during the development stage which are currently in use. Such amounts are capitalized and then amortized using the straight-line method over their expected useful lives. Expenses that do not fulfill the requirements for capitalization are expensed as incurred.

Amortized intangible assets, such as finite lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable through its expected future cash flows.

Intangible assets with an indefinite life are not amortized and are subject to impairment tests on an annual basis as well as whenever certain circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of those intangible assets exceeds their recoverable value.

The Company’s intangible assets with an indefinite life mainly consist of rights to produce and distribute Coca-Cola trademark products in the Company’s territories. These rights are contained in agreements that are standard contracts that The Coca-Cola Company has with its bottlers.

As of December 31, 2015, the Company had nine bottler agreements in Mexico: (i) the agreements for the Valley of Mexico territory, which are up for renewal in May 2016 and June 2023, (ii) the agreement for the Southeast territory, which is up for renewal in June 2023, (iii) three agreements for the Central territory, which are up for renewal in May 2016, July 2016 and May 2025, (iv) the agreement for the Northeast territory, which is up for renewal in May 2016, and (v) two agreements for the Bajio territory, which are up for renewal in May 2016 and May 2025. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had four bottler agreements in Brazil, which are up for renewal in October 2017 (two agreements) and April 2024 (two agreements); and one bottler agreement in each of Argentina, which is up for renewal in September 2024; Colombia, which is up for renewal in June 2024; Venezuela, which is up for renewal in August 2016; Guatemala, which is up for renewal in March 2025; Costa Rica, which is up for renewal in September 2017; Nicaragua, which is up for renewal in May 2016 and Panama, which is up for renewal in November 2024. The bottler agreements are automatically renewable for ten-year terms, subject to the right of either party to give prior notice that it does not wish to renew a specific agreement. In addition, these agreements generally may be terminated in the case of material breach. Termination would prevent the Company from selling Coca-Cola trademark beverages in the affected territory and would have an adverse effect on the Company´s business, financial conditions, results from operations and prospects.

3.15 Non-current assets held for sale

Non-current assets and disposal groups are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the non-current asset (or disposal group) is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale, which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classification.

 

F-22


Table of Contents

When the Company is committed to a sale plan involving loss of control of a subsidiary, all of the assets and liabilities of that subsidiary are classified as held for sale when the criteria described above are met, regardless of whether the Company will retain a non-controlling interest in its former subsidiary after the sale.

Non-current assets (and disposal groups) classified as held for sale are measured at the lower of their previous carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell.

3.16 Impairment of non-financial assets

At the end of each reporting period, the Company reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the Company estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. Where a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to individual CGUs, or otherwise they are allocated to the smallest CGUs for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis can be identified.

Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment at least annually, and whenever there is an indication that the asset may be impaired.

For goodwill and other indefinite lived intangible assets, the Company tests for impairment on an annual basis and whenever certain circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the cash generating unit might exceed its recoverable amount.

Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows have not been adjusted.

If the recoverable amount of an asset (or CGU) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (or CGU) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognized immediately in consolidated net income.

Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (or CGU) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized for the asset (or CGU) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognized immediately in consolidated net income. Impairment losses related to goodwill are not reversible.

As of December, 31 2015 and 2014 there was no impairment recognized in non-financial assets.

3.17 Leases

The determination of whether an arrangement is, or contains, a lease is based on the substance of the arrangement at inception date, whether fulfillment of the arrangement is dependent on the use of a specific asset or assets or the arrangement conveys a right to use the asset, even if that right is not explicitly specified in an arrangement.

Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.

Assets held under finance leases are initially recognized as assets of the Company at their fair value at the inception of the lease or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the consolidated statement of financial position as a finance lease obligation. Lease payments are apportioned between finance expenses and reduction of the lease obligation so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance expenses are recognized immediately in consolidated net income, unless they are directly attributable to qualifying assets, in which case they are capitalized in accordance with the Company’s general policy on borrowing costs. Contingent rentals are recognized as expenses in the periods in which they are incurred. Assets held under finance leases are depreciated over their expected useful lives on the same basis as owned assets or, where shorter, the term of the relevant lease.

Operating lease payments are recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term, except where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased asset are consumed. Contingent rentals arising under operating leases are recognized as an expense in the period in which they are incurred. In the event that lease incentives are received to enter into operating leases, such incentives are recognized as a liability. The aggregate benefit of incentives is recognized as a reduction of rental expense on a straight-line basis, except where another systematic basis is more representative of the time pattern in which economic benefits from the leased asset are consumed. Leasehold improvements, on operating leases are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of either the useful life of the assets or the related lease term.

 

F-23


Table of Contents

3.18 Financial liabilities and equity instruments

3.18.1 Classification as debt or equity

Debt and equity instruments issued by a group entity are classified as either financial liabilities or as equity in accordance with the substance of the contractual arrangements and the definitions of a financial liability and an equity instrument.

3.18.2 Equity instruments

An equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of an entity after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity instruments issued by the Company are recognized at the proceeds received, net of direct issue costs.

Repurchase of the Company’s own equity instruments is recognized and deducted directly in equity. No gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss on the purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of the Company’s own equity instruments.

3.18.3 Financial liabilities

Initial recognition and measurement

Financial liabilities within the scope of IAS 39 are classified as financial liabilities at FVTPL, loans and borrowings, payables, or as derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective hedge, as appropriate. The Company determines the classification of its financial liabilities at initial recognition.

All financial liabilities are recognized initially at fair value plus, in the case of loans and borrowings, directly attributable transaction costs.

The Company financial liabilities include trade and other payables, loans and borrowings, and derivative financial instruments, see Note 3.7.

Subsequent measurement

The measurement of financial liabilities depends on their classification as described below:

3.18.4 Loans and borrowings

After initial recognition, interest bearing loans and borrowings are subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method. Gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated statements of income when the liabilities are derecognized as well as through the effective interest method amortization process.

Amortized cost is calculated by taking into account any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or costs that are an integral part of the effective interest method. The effective interest method amortization is included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Derecognition

A financial liability is derecognized when the obligation under the liability is discharged or cancelled or expires.

When an existing financial liability is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or modification is treated as the derecognition of the original liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference in the respective carrying amounts is recognized in the consolidated statements of income.

3.19 Provisions

Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present obligation (contractual or implied) as a result of a past event, it is probable that the Company will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate can be made of the amount of the obligation.

 

F-24


Table of Contents

The amount recognized as a provision is the best estimate of the consideration required to settle the present obligation at the end of the reporting period, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation. When a provision is measured using the cash flows estimated to settle the present obligation, its carrying amount is the present value of those cash flows (where the effect of the time value of money is material).

When some or all of the economic benefits required to settle a provision are expected to be recovered from a third party, a receivable is recognized as an asset if it is virtually certain that reimbursement will be received and the amount of the receivable can be measured reliably.

The Company recognizes a provision for a loss contingency when it is probable (i.e. the probability that the event will occur is greater than the probability that it will not) that certain effects related to past events, would materialize and can be reasonably quantified. These events and their financial impact are also disclosed as loss contingencies in the consolidated financial statements when the risk of loss is deemed to be other than remote. The Company does not recognize an asset for a gain contingency until the gain is realized, see Note 24.

Restructuring provisions are recognized only when the recognition criteria for provisions are fulfilled. The Company has a constructive obligation when a detailed formal plan identifies the business or part of the business concerned, the location and number of employees affected, a detailed estimate of the associated costs, and an appropriate timeline. Furthermore, the employees affected must have been notified of the plans main features.

3.20 Post-employment and other non-current employee benefits

Post-employment and other non-current employee benefits, which are considered to be monetary items, include obligations for pension and post-employment plans and seniority premiums, all based on actuarial calculations, using the projected unit credit method.

In Mexico, the economic benefits and retirement pensions are granted to employees with 10 years of service and minimum age of 60. In accordance with Mexican Labor Law, the Company provides seniority premium benefits to its employees under certain circumstances. These benefits consist of a one-time payment equivalent to 12 days wages for each year of service (at the employee’s most recent salary, but not to exceed twice the legal minimum wage), payable to all employees with 15 or more years of service, as well as to certain employees terminated involuntarily prior to the vesting of their seniority premium benefit.

For defined benefit retirement plans and other non-current employee benefits, such as the Company’s sponsored pension and retirement plans and seniority premiums, the cost of providing benefits is determined using the projected unit credit method, with actuarial valuations being carried out at the end of each reporting period. All remeasurements of the Company’s defined benefit obligation such as actuarial gains and losses and return on plan assets are recognized directly in other comprehensive income (“OCI”). The Company presents service costs within cost of goods sold, administrative and selling expenses in the consolidated statements of income. The Company presents net interest cost within interest expense in the consolidated statements of income. The projected benefit obligation recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position represents the present value of the defined benefit obligation as of the end of each reporting period. Certain subsidiaries of the Company have established plan assets for the payment of pension benefits and seniority premiums through irrevocable trusts of which the employees are named as beneficiaries, which serve to increase the funded status of such plans’ related obligations.

Costs related to compensated absences, such as vacations and vacation premiums, are recognized on an accrual basis. Cost for mandatory severance benefits are recorded as incurred.

The Company recognizes a liability and expense for termination benefits at the earlier of the following dates:

 

a. When it can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits; and

 

b. When it recognizes costs for a restructuring that is within the scope of IAS 37, Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, and involves the payment of termination benefits.

The Company is demonstrably committed to a termination when, and only when, the entity has a detailed formal plan for the termination and is without realistic possibility of withdrawal.

A settlement occurs when an employer enters into a transaction that eliminates all further legal of constructive obligations for part or all of the benefits provided under a defined benefit plan. A curtailment arises from an isolated event such as closing of a plant, discontinuance of an operation or termination or suspension of a plan. Gains or losses on the settlement or curtailment of a defined benefit plan are recognized when the settlement or curtailment occurs.

 

F-25


Table of Contents

During 2014, the Company settled its pension plan in Brazil and consequently recognized the corresponding effects of the settlement on the results of the current period, refer to Note 15.

3.21 Revenue recognition

Sales of products are recognized as revenue upon delivery to the customer, and once all the following conditions are satisfied:

 

 

The Company has transferred to the buyer the significant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods;

 

 

The Company retains neither continuing managerial involvement to the degree usually associated with ownership nor effective control over the goods sold;

 

 

The amount of revenue can be measured reliably;

 

 

It is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the Company; and

 

 

The costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably.

All of the above conditions are typically met at the point in time that goods are delivered to the customer at the customers’ facilities. Net sales reflect units delivered at list prices reduced by promotional allowances, discounts and the amortization of the agreements with customers to obtain the rights to sell and promote the Company’s products.

Rendering of services and other

Revenue arising from services of sales of waste material and packing of raw materials are recognized in the other operating income caption in the consolidated income statement.

The Company recognized these transactions as revenues in accordance with the requirements established in the IAS 18, delivery of goods and rendering of services, which are:

 

a) The amount of revenue can be measured reliably;

 

b) It is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity;

 

c) The stage of completion of the transaction at the end of the reporting period can be measured reliably; and

 

d) The costs incurred for the transaction and the costs to complete the transaction can be measured reliably.

Interest income revenue arising from the use by others of entity assets yielding interest is recognized once all the following conditions are satisfied:

 

 

It is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the entity; and

 

 

The amount of the revenue can be measured reliably.

For all financial instruments measured at amortized cost and interest bearing financial assets classified as available-for-sale, interest income or expense is recorded using the effective interest rate (“EIR”), which is the rate that exactly discounts the estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial instrument or a shorter period, where appropriate, to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or liability. The related interest income is included in the consolidated statements of income.

3.22 Administrative and selling expenses

Administrative expenses include labor costs (salaries and other benefits, including employee profit sharing “PTU” of employees not directly involved in the sale of the Company’s products, as well as professional service fees, the depreciation of office facilities, amortization of capitalized information technology system implementation costs and any other similar costs.

Selling expenses include:

 

 

Distribution: labor costs (salaries and other related benefits), outbound freight costs, warehousing costs of finished products, write off of returnable bottles in the distribution process, depreciation and maintenance of trucks and other distribution facilities and equipment. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, these distribution costs amounted to Ps. 20,205, Ps. 19,236 and Ps. 17,971, respectively;

 

 

Sales: labor costs (salaries and other benefits including PTU) and sales commissions paid to sales personnel;

 

 

Marketing: promotional expenses and advertising costs.

 

F-26


Table of Contents

PTU is paid by the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries to its eligible employees. In Mexico, employee profit sharing is computed at the rate of 10% of the individual company taxable income, except for considering cumulative dividends received from resident legal persons in Mexico, depreciation of historical rather tax restated values, foreign exchange gains and losses, which are not included until the asset is disposed of or the liability is due and other effects of inflation are also excluded. PTU in Mexico is calculated from the same taxable income for income tax, except for the following: a) neither tax losses from prior years nor the PTU paid during the year are being decrease; and b) payments exempt from taxes for the employees are fully deductible in the PTU computation.

3.23 Income taxes

Income tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax. Income taxes are charged to consolidated net income as they are incurred, except when they relate to items that are recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, in which case, the current and deferred tax are also recognized in other comprehensive income or directly in equity, respectively.

3.23.1 Current income taxes

Income taxes are recorded in the results of the year they are incurred.

3.23.2 Deferred income taxes

Deferred tax is recognized on temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the consolidated financial statements and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profit. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognized for all taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets are generally recognized for all deductible temporary differences to the extent that it is probable that taxable profits will be available against which those deductible temporary differences can be utilized and if any, future benefits from tax loss carry forwards and certain tax credits. Such deferred tax assets and liabilities are not recognized if the temporary difference arises from initial recognition of goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the taxable profit nor the accounting profit, except in the case of Brazil, where certain goodwill amounts are at times deductible for tax purposes.

Deferred tax assets are recognised for all deductible temporary differences, the carry forward of unused tax credits and any unused tax losses. Deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the deductible temporary differences, and the carry forward of unused tax credits and unused tax losses can be utilized. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred tax asset to be utilised. Unrecognised deferred tax assets are re-assessed at each reporting date and are recognised to the extent that it has become probable that future taxable profits will allow the deferred tax asset to be recovered.

Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates, and interests in joint ventures, except where the Company is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred tax assets arising from deductible temporary differences associated with such investments and interests are only recognized to the extent that it is probable that there will be sufficient taxable profits against which to utilize the benefits of the temporary differences and they are expected to reverse in the foreseeable future.

Deferred income taxes are classified as a non-current asset or liability, regardless of when the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that sufficient taxable profits will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered.

Deferred tax relating to items recognised in the other comprehensive income are recognised in correlation to the underlying transaction in OCI.

Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and the deferred taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period in which the liability is settled or the asset realized, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period. The measurement of deferred tax liabilities and assets reflects the tax consequences that would follow from the manner in which the Company expects, at the end of the reporting period, to recover or settle the carrying amount of its assets and liabilities.

In Mexico, the income tax rate is 30% for 2013, 2014 and 2015. As a result of the Mexican Tax Reform discussed below, it will also be 30% for 2016.

 

F-27


Table of Contents

3.24 Share-based payments transactions

Senior executives of the Company receive remuneration in the form of share-based payment transactions, whereby employees render services as consideration for equity instruments. The equity instruments are granted and then held by a trust controlled by FEMSA. They are accounted for as equity settled transactions. The award of equity instruments is granted to a fixed value.

Share-based payments to employees are measured at the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date. The fair value determined at the grant date of the share-based payments is expensed and recognized based on the graded vesting method over the vesting period.

3.25 Earnings per share

The Company presents basic earnings per share (EPS) data for its shares. The Company does not have potentially dilutive shares and therefore its basic earnings per share is equivalent to its diluted earnings per share. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing the net income attributable to controlling interest by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period adjusted for the weighted average of own shares purchased in the year.

3.26 Issuance of stock

The Company recognizes the issuance of own stock as an equity transaction. The difference between the book value of the shares issued and the amount contributed by the non-controlling interest holder or third party is recorded as additional paid-in capital.

Note 4. Mergers and Acquisitions

4.1 Mergers and Acquisitions

The Company has had certain business mergers and acquisitions that were recorded using the acquisition method of accounting. The results of the acquired operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since the date on which the Company obtained control of the respective business, as disclosed below. Therefore, the consolidated statements of income and the consolidated statements of financial position in the years of such acquisitions are not comparable with previous periods. The consolidated statements of cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2013 show the merged and acquired operations net of the cash related to those mergers and acquisitions. For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company did not have any acquisitions or mergers.

While all of the acquired companies disclosed below are bottlers of Coca-Cola trademarked beverages, such acquired entities were not under common ownership control prior to the acquisition.

4.1.1 Acquisition of Grupo Spaipa

On October 29, 2013, the Company through its Brazilian subsidiary Spal Industria Brasileira de Bebidas, S.A. completed the acquisition of 100% of Grupo Spaipa and three holding companies (collectively “Spaipa”) for Ps. 26,856 in an all cash transaction. Spaipa was a bottler of Coca-Cola trademark products which operated mainly in Sao Paulo and Paraná, Brazil. This acquisition was made to reinforce the Company’s leadership position in Brazil. Transaction related costs of Ps. 8 were expensed by the Company as incurred, and recorded as a component of administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated income statements. Spaipa was included in the operating results from November 2013.

The fair value of Spaipa net assets acquired is as follows:

 

Total current assets, including cash acquired of Ps. 3,800

   Ps. 5,918   

Total non-current assets

     5,090   

Distribution rights

     11,872   
  

 

 

 

Total assets

     22,880   

Total liabilities

     (6,807
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

     16,073   

Goodwill

     10,783   
  

 

 

 

Total consideration transferred

   Ps.  26,856   
  

 

 

 

 

F-28


Table of Contents

The Company expects to recover the amount recorded as goodwill through synergies related to the available production capacity. Goodwill has been allocated to the Company´s cash generating unit in Brazil. The goodwill recognized and expected to be deductible for income tax purposes according to Brazil tax law, was Ps. 22,202.

Selected income statement information of Spaipa for the period from the acquisition date through to December 31, 2013 is as follows:

 

Income statement

   2013  

Total revenues

   Ps.  2,466   

Income before taxes

     354   

Net income

     311   

4.1.2 Acquisition of Companhia Fluminense de Refrigerantes

On August 22, 2013, the Company through its Brazilian subsidiary Spal Industria Brasileira de Bebidas S.A., completed the acquisition of 100% of Companhia Fluminense de Refrigerantes (“Companhia Fluminense”) for Ps. 4,657 in an all cash transaction. Companhia Fluminense was a bottler of Coca-Cola trademark products which operated in the states of Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, and Sao Paulo, Brazil. This acquisition was made to reinforce the Company’s leadership position in Brazil. Transaction related costs of Ps. 11 were expensed by the Company as incurred, and recorded as a component of administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated income statements. Companhia Fluminense was included in operating results from September 2013.

The fair value of Companhia Fluminense net assets acquired is as follows:

 

Total current assets, including cash acquired of Ps. 9

   Ps. 515   

Total non-current assets

     1,721   

Distribution rights

     2,077   
  

 

 

 

Total assets

     4,313   

Total liabilities

     (1,963
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

     2,350   

Goodwill

     2,307   
  

 

 

 

Total consideration transferred

   Ps.  4,657   
  

 

 

 

The Company expects to recover the amount recorded as goodwill through synergies related to the available production capacity. Goodwill has been allocated to the Company cash generating unit in Brazil. The goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes according to Brazil tax law was Ps. 4,581.

Selected income statement information of Companhia Fluminense for the period from the acquisition date through to December 31, 2013 is as follows:

 

Income statement

   2013  

Total revenues

   Ps.  981   

Loss before taxes

     (39

Net loss

     (34

4.1.3 Merger with Grupo Yoli

On May 24, 2013, the Company completed the merger of 100% of Grupo Yoli. Grupo Yoli comprised the bottler entity Yoli de Acapulco, S.A. de C.V. and nine other entities. Grupo Yoli was a bottler of Coca-Cola trademark products which operates mainly in the state of Guerrero, as well as in parts of the state of Oaxaca in Mexico. This merger was made to reinforce the Company’s leadership position in Mexico. The transaction involved the issuance of 42,377,925 new L shares of Coca-Cola FEMSA, along with a cash payment immediately prior to closing of Ps. 1,109, in exchange for 100% share ownership of Grupo Yoli, which was accomplished through a merger. The total purchase price was Ps. 9,130 based on a share price of Ps. 189.27 per share on May 24, 2013. Transaction related costs of Ps. 82 were expensed by the Company as incurred, and recorded as a component of administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated income statements. Grupo Yoli was included in operating results from June 2013.

 

F-29


Table of Contents

The fair value of Grupo Yoli net assets acquired is as follows:

 

Total current assets, including cash acquired of Ps. 63

   Ps. 837   

Total non-current assets

     2,144   

Distribution rights

     3,503   
  

 

 

 

Total assets

     6,484   

Total liabilities

     (1,487
  

 

 

 

Net assets acquired

     4,997   

Goodwill

     4,133   
  

 

 

 

Total consideration transferred

   Ps.  9,130   
  

 

 

 

The Company expects to recover the amount recorded as goodwill through synergies related to the available production capacity. Goodwill has been allocated to the Company’s cash generating unit in Mexico. The entire amount of goodwill will not be tax deductible.

Selected income statement information of Grupo Yoli for the period from to the acquisition date through December 31, 2013 is as follows:

 

Income statement

   2013  

Total revenues

   Ps.  2,240   

Income before taxes

     70   

Net income

     44   

Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Data.

The following unaudited 2013 consolidated pro forma financial data represent the Company’s historical financial statements, adjusted to give effect to (i)  the acquisition of Spaipa, Companhia Fluminense and the merger with Grupo Yoli, mentioned in the preceding paragraphs as if they occurred on January 1, 2013; and (ii)  certain accounting adjustments mainly related to the pro forma depreciation of fixed assets of the acquired companies.

 

     Unaudited Pro Forma Financial
Information for the year

ended December 31, 2013
 

Total revenues

   Ps.  168,618   

Income before taxes

     15,958   

Net income

     10,357   

Earnings per share

     4.88   

Note 5. Cash and Cash Equivalents

For the purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash includes cash on hand and in banks and cash equivalents, which are short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value, with a maturity date of three months or less at their acquisition date. Cash at the end of the reporting period consists of the following:

 

     2015      2014  

Cash and bank balances

   Ps. 4,589       Ps.  7,212   

Cash equivalents (see Note 3.5)

     11,400         5,746   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps.  15,989       Ps.  12,958   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

F-30


Table of Contents

As explained in Note 3.3 above, the Company operates in Venezuela, which has a certain level of exchange control restrictions, which might prevent cash and cash equivalent balances from being available for use elsewhere in the group. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, cash and cash equivalent balances of the Company’s Venezuela subsidiary were Ps. 1,259 and Ps. 1,950, respectively.

Note 6. Accounts Receivable

 

     2015     2014  

Trade receivables

   Ps. 7,175      Ps. 7,655   

The Coca-Cola Company (related party) (Note 13)

     1,559        1,584   

Loans to employees

     110        172   

FEMSA and subsidiaries (related parties) (Note 13)

     495        480   

Other related parties (Note 13)

     167        246   

Other

     424        569   

Allowance for doubtful accounts on trade receivables

     (283     (367
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Ps. 9,647      Ps. 10,339   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Coca-Cola FEMSA has accounts receivable from The Coca-Cola Company primarily arising from the latter’s participation in advertising and promotional programs and investment in refrigeration equipment and returnable bottles made by Coca-Cola FEMSA.

6.1 Trade receivables

Accounts receivable representing rights arising from sales and loans to employees or any other similar concept, are presented net of discounts and the allowance for doubtful accounts.

The carrying value of accounts receivable approximates its fair value as of December 31, 2015 and 2014.

 

     2015      2014  

Aging of trade receivables past due but not impaired

             

60-90 days

   Ps. 12       Ps. 33   

90-120 days

     1         7   

120+ days

     21         27   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 34       Ps. 67   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

6.2 Changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Balance at beginning of the year

   Ps. 367      Ps. 399      Ps. 329   

Allowance for the year

     52        82        138   

Charges and write-offs of uncollectible accounts

     (62     (78     (24

Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates

     (74     (36     (44
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of the year

   Ps. 283      Ps. 367      Ps. 399   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

In determining the recoverability of trade receivables, the Company considers any change in the credit quality of the trade receivable from the date credit was initially granted up to the end of the reporting period. The concentration of credit risk is limited due to the customer base being large and unrelated.

 

Aging of impaired trade receivables

   2015      2014  

60-90 days

   Ps. 2       Ps. 13   

90-120 days

     12         10   

120+ days

     269         344   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 283       Ps. 367   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

6.3 Payments from The Coca-Cola Company:

The Coca-Cola Company participates in certain advertising and promotional programs as well as in the Company’s refrigeration equipment and returnable bottles investment program. Contributions received by the Company for advertising and promotional

 

F-31


Table of Contents

incentives are recognized as a reduction in selling expenses and contributions received for the refrigeration equipment and returnable bottles investment program are recorded as a reduction in the investment in refrigeration equipment and returnable bottles items. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 contributions received were Ps. 3,749, Ps. 4,118 and Ps. 4,206, respectively.

Note 7. Inventories

 

     2015      2014  

Finished products

   Ps. 2,302       Ps. 2,724   

Raw materials

     2,830         2,995   

Non strategic spare parts

     1,431         1,111   

Inventories in transit

     1,386         819   

Packing materials

     87         61   

Other

     30         109   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 8,066       Ps. 7,819   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized write-downs of its inventories for Ps. 199, Ps. 248 and Ps. 457, respectively to net realizable value.

For the years ended at 2015, 2014 and 2013, changes in inventories are comprised as follows and included in the consolidated income statement under the cost of goods sold caption:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Changes in inventories of finished goods and work in progress

   Ps. 20,053       Ps. 13,409       Ps. 9,247   

Raw materials and consumables used

     51,904         53,535         49,075   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 71,957       Ps. 66,944       Ps. 58,322   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 8. Other Current Assets and Other Current Financial Assets

8.1 Other Current Assets:

 

     2015      2014  

Prepaid expenses

   Ps. 2,888       Ps. 1,051   

Agreements with customers

     168         161   

Other

     27         174   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 3,083       Ps. 1,386   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Prepaid expenses as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:

 

     2015      2014  

Advances for inventories

   Ps. 2,283       Ps. 364   

Advertising and promotional expenses paid in advance

     53         142   

Advances to service suppliers

     427         363   

Prepaid insurance

     25         24   

Others

     100         158   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 2,888       Ps. 1,051   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Amortization of advertising and promotional expenses paid in advance recorded in the consolidated income statements for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 amounted to Ps. 3,447, Ps. 3,488 and Ps. 5,391, respectively.

8.2 Other Current Financial Assets:

 

     2015      2014  

Restricted cash

   Ps. 704       Ps. 1,213   

Derivative financial instruments (See Note 19)

     523         331   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 1,227       Ps. 1,544   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

F-32


Table of Contents

The Company has pledged part of its short-term deposits in order to fulfill the collateral requirements for the accounts payable in different currencies. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the fair value of the short-term deposit pledged were:

 

     2015      2014  

Venezuelan bolivars

   Ps. 344       Ps. 550   

Brazilian reais

     360         640   

Colombian pesos

     —           23   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total restricted cash

   Ps. 704       Ps. 1,213   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 9. Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures

Details of the investments accounted for under the equity method at the end of the reporting period are as follows:

 

               Ownership Percentage     Carrying Amount  

Investee

   Principal
Activity
   Place of
Incorporation
   2015     2014     2015      2014  

Joint ventures:

               

Compañía Panameña de Bebidas, S.A.P.I. de C.V.

   Beverages    Mexico      50.0     50.0   Ps. 1,573       Ps. 1,740   

Dispensadoras de Café, S.A.P.I. de C.V.

   Services    Mexico      50.0     50.0     161         190   

Estancia Hidromineral Itabirito, LTDA

   Bottling and

distribution

   Brazil      50.0     50.0     160         164   

Fountain Agua Mineral, LTDA

   Beverages    Brazil      50.0     50.0     491         573   

Coca-Cola FEMSA Philippines, Inc.

   Bottling    Philippines      51.0     51.0     9,996         9,021   

Associates:

               

Promotora Industrial Azucarera, S.A. de C.V. (“PIASA”) (1)

   Sugar production    Mexico      36.3     36.3     2,187         2,082   

Jugos del Valle, S.A.P.I. de C.V. (1)

   Beverages    Mexico      26.3     26.3     1,531         1,470   

Leao Alimentos e Bebidas, LTDA (1)

   Beverages    Brazil      24.4     24.4     1,363         1,670   

Industria Envasadora de Querétaro, S.A. de C.V. (“IEQSA”) (1)

   Caned bottling    Mexico      26.5     32.8     172         194   

Industria Mexicana de Reciclaje, S.A. de C.V. (“IMER”) (1)

   Recycling    Mexico      35.0     35.0     100         98   

KSP Participacoes LTDA (1)

   Beverages    Brazil      38.7     38.7     80         91   

Other

   Various    Various      Various        Various        59         33   
            

 

 

    

 

 

 
             Ps. 17,873       Ps. 17,326   
            

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Accounting method:

 

(1) The Company has significant influence due to the fact that it has power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the investee.

During 2015 the Company received dividends from Industria Envasadora de Queretaro, S.A. de C.V., in the amount of Ps. 13 and subsequently sold shares for an amount of Ps. 22.

During 2015 the Company made capital contributions to Compañía Panameña de Bebidas, S.A.P.I. de C.V. in the amount of Ps. 7.

During 2015 the Company made capital contributions to Leao Alimentos e Bebidas, LTDA in the amount of Ps. 71.

During 2014 the Company converted its account receivable from Compañía Panameña de Bebidas, S.A.P.I. de C.V. in the amount of Ps. 814 into an additional capital contribution in the investee.

During 2014 the Company made capital contributions to Jugos del Valle, S.A.P.I. de C.V. in the amount of Ps. 25.

During 2014 the Company received dividends from Jugos del Valle, S.A.P.I. de C.V., Estancia Hidromineral Itabirito, Ltda. and Fountain Água Mineral Ltda., in the amount of Ps. 48, Ps. 50 and Ps.50, respectively.

 

F-33


Table of Contents

On January 25, 2013, the Company closed the acquisition of 51% of CCFPI for an amount of $688.5 U.S. dollars (Ps. 8,904) in an all-cash transaction. As part of the agreement, the Company obtained a call option to acquire the remaining 49% of CCFPI at any time during the seven years following the closing. The Company also has a put option to sell its 51% ownership to The Coca-Cola Company at any time from the fifth anniversary of the date of acquisition until the sixth anniversary, at a price which is based in part on the fair value of CCFPI at the date of acquisition (See Note 19.6).

Although Coca-Cola FEMSA currently owns 51% of CCFPI, when considering (i) the terms of the shareholders agreements (specifically the fact that during the initial four year period the joint approval of both Coca-Cola FEMSA and TCCC is required to approve CCFPI´s annual business plan, which is the key documents pursuant to which CCFPI´s business is operated and any other matters); and (ii) potential voting rights to acquire the remaining 49% of CCFPI are not probable to be executed in the foreseeable future and the fact that the call option remains “out of the money”, the Company has concluded that Coca-Cola FEMSA did not control CCFPI during any of the periods presented in our consolidated financial statements and consequently the Company has accounted for this investment as joint venture using the equity method.

As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 the total net income corresponding to the immaterial associates was Ps. 185, Ps. 195 and Ps. 138 respectively.

As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 the total net (loss) income corresponding to the immaterial joint ventures was Ps. (30), Ps. (320) and Ps. 151 respectively.

 

F-34


Table of Contents

Note 10. Property, Plant and Equipment, net

 

Cost    Land     Buildings     Machinery
and
Equipment
    Refrigeration
Equipment
    Returnable
Bottles
    Investments
in Fixed
Assets in
Progress
    Leasehold
Improvements
    Other     Total  

Cost as of January 1, 2013

   Ps. 3,863      Ps. 11,900      Ps. 30,841      Ps. 13,019      Ps. 5,814      Ps. 3,668      Ps. 537      Ps. 740      Ps. 70,382   

Additions

     77        120        1,512        1,445        1,435        5,685        —          341        10,615   

Additions from business combinations

     534        2,268        2,414        428        96        614        —          264        6,618   

Transfer of completed projects in progress

     389        750        875        1,144        785        (3,991     48        —          —     

Transfer (to)/from assets classified as held for sale

     —          —          (189     —          —          —          —          —          (189

Disposals

     (1     (168     (968     (749     (324     (332     (12     (14     (2,568

Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates

     (250     (1,331     (3,588     (1,135     (466     (208     (99     (55     (7,132

Changes in value on the recognition of inflation effects

     228        1,191        2,252        603        46        165        —          277        4,762   

Capitalization of borrowing costs

     —          —          32        —          —          —          —          —          32   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cost as of December 31, 2013

   Ps. 4,840      Ps. 14,730      Ps. 33,181      Ps. 14,755      Ps. 7,386      Ps. 5,601      Ps. 474      Ps. 1,553      Ps. 82,520   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
Cost    Land     Buildings     Machinery
and
Equipment
    Refrigeration
Equipment
    Returnable
Bottles
    Investments
in Fixed
Assets in
Progress
    Leasehold
Improvements
    Other     Total  

Cost as of January 1, 2014

   Ps. 4,840      Ps. 14,730      Ps. 33,181      Ps. 14,755      Ps. 7,386      Ps. 5,601      Ps. 474      Ps. 1,553      Ps. 82,520   

Additions

     532        42        542        327        398        8,787        —          234        10,862   

Adjustment of fair value of past business combinations

     (115     (610     891        (57     —          (68     99        (253     (113

Transfer of completed projects in progress

     —          1,263        2,708        1,523        1,994        (7,581     90        3        —     

Transfer (to)/from assets classified as held for sale

     —          —          (134     —          —          —          —          —          (134

Disposals

     (10     (113     (1,516     (632     (60     (1     (14     (79     (2,425

Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates

     (663     (3,117     (5,414     (1,975     (323     (545     (42     (506     (12,585

Changes in value on the recognition of inflation effects

     110        355        536        186        7        29        —          110        1,333   

Capitalization of borrowing costs

     —          —          33        —          —          263        —          —          296   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cost as of December 31, 2014

   Ps. 4,694      Ps. 12,550      Ps. 30,827      Ps. 14,127      Ps. 9,402      Ps. 6,485      Ps. 607      Ps. 1,062      Ps. 79,754   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-35


Table of Contents
Cost    Land     Buildings     Machinery
and
Equipment
    Refrigeration
Equipment
    Returnable
Bottles
    Investments
in Fixed
Assets in
Progress
    Leasehold
Improvements
    Other     Total  

Cost as of January 1, 2015

   Ps. 4,694     Ps. 12,550     Ps. 30,827     Ps. 14,127     Ps. 9,402     Ps. 6,485     Ps. 607     Ps. 1,062     Ps. 79,754  

Additions

     358        1,201        1,121        1,175        1,655        4,524        —          511        10,545   

Transfer of completed projects in progress

     59        1,289        3,111        1,168        662        (6,338     49        —          —     

Disposals

     (54     (46     (1,284     (972     (103     —          (47     (39     (2,545

Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates

     (595     (1,352     (4,051     (1,217     (266     (1,007     (13     (848     (9,349

Changes in value on the recognition of inflation effects

     245        503        964        295        301        91        —          229        2,628   

Capitalization of borrowing costs

     —          —          —          —          —          57        —          —          57   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cost as of December 31, 2015

   Ps. 4,707     Ps. 14,145     Ps. 30,688     Ps. 14,576     Ps. 11,651     Ps. 3,812     Ps. 596     Ps. 915     Ps. 81,090  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
Accumulated Depreciation    Land     Buildings     Machinery
and
Equipment
    Refrigeration
Equipment
    Returnable
Bottles
    Investments
in Fixed
Assets in
Progress
    Leasehold
Improvements
    Other     Total  

Accumulated depreciation as of January 1, 2013

   Ps. —       Ps. (3,687   Ps. (14,685   Ps. (7,125   Ps. (1,988   Ps. —       Ps. (65   Ps. (315   Ps. (27,865

Depreciation for the year

       (297     (2,639     (1,631     (1,662     —          (46     (96     (6,371

Transfer (to)/from assets classified as held for sale

     —          —          88        —          —          —          —          —          88   

Disposals

     —          160        953        785        33        —          12        6        1,949   

Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates

     —          587        2,044        755        143        —          8        73        3,610   

Changes in value on the recognition of inflation effects

     —          (583     (993     (442     (6     —          —          (122     (2,146
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation as of December 31, 2013

   Ps. —       Ps. (3,820   Ps. (15,232   Ps. (7,658   Ps.  (3,480   Ps. —       Ps. (91   Ps. (454   Ps . (30,735
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-36


Table of Contents
Accumulated Depreciation    Land      Buildings     Machinery
and
Equipment
    Refrigeration
Equipment
    Returnable
Bottles
    Investments
in Fixed
Assets in
Progress
     Leasehold
Improvements
    Other     Total  

Accumulated depreciation as of January 1, 2014

   Ps. —        Ps. (3,820   Ps. (15,232   Ps. (7,658   Ps. (3,480   Ps. —        Ps. (91   Ps. (454   Ps. (30,735

Depreciation for the year

     —           (317     (2,320     (1,396     (1,879     —           (45     (115     (6,072

Transfer (to)/from assets classified as held for sale

     —           —          62        —          —          —           —          —          62   

Disposals

     —           56        1,474        602        57        —           13        1        2,203   

Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates

     —           1,512        3,479        1,046        105        —           1        236        6,379   

Changes in value on the recognition of inflation effects

     —           (175     (692     (135     (8     —           —          (54     (1,064
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation as of December 31, 2014

   Ps. —        Ps. (2,744   Ps. (13,229   Ps. (7,541   Ps. (5,205   Ps. —        Ps. (122   Ps. (386   Ps. (29,227
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
Accumulated Depreciation    Land      Buildings     Machinery
and
Equipment
    Refrigeration
Equipment
    Returnable
Bottles
    Investments
in Fixed
Assets in
Progress
     Leasehold
Improvements
    Other     Total  

Accumulated depreciation as of January 1, 2015

   Ps. —        Ps. (2,744   Ps. (13,229   Ps. (7,541   Ps. (5,205   Ps. —        Ps. (122   Ps. (386   Ps. (29,227

Depreciation for the year

     —           (341     (2,369     (1,432     (1,984     —           (41     (143     (6,310

Disposals

     —           70        1,093        946        80        —           7        2        2,198   

Effects of changes in foreign exchange rates

     —           498        2,142        1,041        167        —           21        212        4,081   

Changes in value on the recognition of inflation effects

     —           (187     (425     (166     (436     —           —          (86     (1,300
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated depreciation as of December 31, 2015

   Ps. —        Ps. (2,704   Ps. (12,788   Ps. (7,152   Ps. (7,378   Ps. —        Ps. (135   Ps. (401   Ps. (30,558
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-37


Table of Contents

Carrying Amount

  Land     Buildings     Machinery
and
Equipment
    Refrigeration
Equipment
    Returnable
Bottles
    Investments
in Fixed
Assets in
Progress
    Leasehold
Improvements
    Other     Total  

As of December 31, 2013

  Ps. 4,840      Ps.  10,910      Ps.  17,949      Ps.  7,097      Ps.  3,906      Ps.  5,601      Ps.  383      Ps.  1,099      Ps.  51,785   

As of December 31, 2014

  Ps.  4,694      Ps.  9,806      Ps.  17,598      Ps.  6,586      Ps.  4,197      Ps.  6,485      Ps.  485      Ps.  676      Ps.  50,527   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015

  Ps.  4,707     Ps.  11,441     Ps.  17,900     Ps.  7,424     Ps.  4,273     Ps.  3,812     Ps.  461     Ps.  514     Ps.  50,532  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 the Company capitalized Ps. 57, Ps. 296 and Ps. 32, respectively of borrowing costs in relation to Ps. 993, Ps. 1,915 and Ps. 790 in qualifying assets. The effective interest rates used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalization were 4.1%, 4.8% and 4.1% respectively.

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 interest expenses and net foreign exchange losses (gains) are analyzed as follows:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Interest expense and foreign exchange, net

   Ps. 7,358       Ps. 6,760       Ps. 3,830   

Amount capitalized  (1)

     85         338         57   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net amount in consolidated statements of income

   Ps. 7,273       Ps.  6,422       Ps.  3,773   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Amount of interest capitalized in property, plant and equipment and amortized intangible assets. Commitments related to acquisitions of property, plant and equipment are disclosed in Note 24.

 

F-38


Table of Contents

Note 11. Intangible Assets

 

Cost

   Rights to
Produce and
Distribute
Coca-Cola
trademark

Products
    Goodwill     Other
indefinite
lived
intangible
assets
    Technology
Costs and
management
systems
    Development
systems
    Other
amortizables
    Total  

Balance as of January 1, 2013

   Ps. 57,270      Ps. 6,972      Ps. 102      Ps. 2,369      Ps. 1,019      Ps. 244      Ps. 67,976   

Purchases

     —          —          —          107        565        82        754   

Acquisition from business combinations

     19,868        13,306        55       43       —          17       33,289   

Transfer of completed development systems

     —          —          —          172        (172     —          —     

Effect of movements in exchange rates

     (1,828     (356 )     (10     (75     —          (14     (2,283

Changes in value on the recognition of inflation effects

     417        —          —          —          —          —          417   

Capitalization of borrowing cost

     —          —          —          25        —          —          25   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cost as of December 31, 2013

   Ps. 75,727      Ps. 19,922      Ps. 147      Ps. 2,641      Ps. 1,412      Ps. 329      Ps. 100,178   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2014

   Ps. 75,727      Ps. 19,922      Ps. 147      Ps. 2,641      Ps. 1,412      Ps. 329      Ps. 100,178   

Purchases

     —          —          —          73        179        29        281   

Changes in fair value of past acquisitions

     (2,416     3,917        —          —          —          —          1,501   

Transfer of completed development systems

     —          —          —          278        (278     —          —     

Effect of movements in exchange rates

     (5,343     (246     (8     (152     (1     (13     (5,763

Changes in value on the recognition of inflation effects

     2,295        —          —          —          —          —          2,295   

Capitalization of borrowing cost

     —          —          —          42        —          —          42   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cost as of December 31, 2014

   Ps. 70,263      Ps. 23,593      Ps. 139      Ps. 2,882      Ps. 1,312      Ps. 345      Ps. 98,534   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2015

   Ps. 70,263      Ps. 23,593      Ps. 139      Ps. 2,882      Ps. 1,312      Ps. 345      Ps. 98,534   

Purchases

     —          —          —          73        458        29        560   

Transfer of completed development systems

     —          —          —          1,085        (1,085     —          —     

Effect of movements in exchange rates

     (4,992     (2,556     (19     (218     (2     (44     (7,831

Changes in value on the recognition of inflation effects

     1,121        —          —          —          —          —          1,121   

Capitalization of borrowing cost

     —          —          —          28        —          —          28   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cost as of December 31, 2015

   Ps. 66,392      Ps. 21,037      Ps. 120      Ps. 3,850      Ps. 683      Ps. 330      Ps. 92,412   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amortization expense

              

Balances as of January 1, 2013

   Ps. —        Ps. —        Ps. —        Ps. (856   Ps. —        Ps. (107   Ps. (963

Amortization expense

     —          —          —          (223     —          (64     (287

Disposals

     —          —          —          2        —          —          2   

Effect of movements in exchange rate

     —          —          —          35        —          9        44   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2013

     —          —          —          (1,042     —          (162     (1,204

Amortization expense

     —          —          —          (231     —          (84     (315

Effect of movements in exchange rate

     —          —          —          —          —          9        9   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2014

     —          —          —          (1,273     —          (237     (1,510

Amortization expense

     —          —          —          (339     —          (35     (374

Effect of movements in exchange rate

     —          —          —          174        —          52        226   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balances as of December 31, 2015

   Ps. —        Ps. —        Ps. —        Ps. (1,438   Ps. —        Ps. (220   Ps. (1,658
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013

   Ps. 75,727      Ps. 19,922      Ps. 147      Ps. 1,599      Ps. 1,412      Ps. 167      Ps. 98,974   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014

   Ps. 70,263      Ps. 23,593      Ps. 139      Ps. 1,609      Ps. 1,312      Ps. 108      Ps. 97,024   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2015

   Ps. 66,392      Ps. 21,037      Ps. 120      Ps. 2,412      Ps. 683      Ps. 110      Ps. 90,754   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-39


Table of Contents

During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 the Company capitalized Ps. 28, Ps. 42 and Ps. 25, respectively of borrowing costs in relation to Ps. 410, Ps. 600 and Ps. 630 in qualifying assets. The effective interest rates used to determine the amount of borrowing costs eligible for capitalization were 4.1%, 4.2% and 4.1%.

For the year ended in December 31, 2015, the amortization of intangible assets is recognized in cost of goods sold, selling expenses and administrative expenses and amounted to Ps. 5, Ps. 60 and Ps. 309, respectively.

For the year ended in December 31, 2014, the amortization of intangible assets is recognized in cost of goods sold, selling expenses and administrative expenses and amounted to Ps. 3, Ps. 188 and Ps. 255, respectively.

For the year ended in December 31, 2013, the amortization of intangible assets is recognized in cost of goods sold, selling expenses and administrative expenses and amounted to Ps. 1, Ps. 80 and Ps. 206, respectively.

The Company’s intangible assets such as technology costs and management systems are subject to amortization with a range in useful lives from 3 to 10 years.

Impairment Tests for Cash-Generating Units Containing Goodwill and Distribution Rights

For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill and distribution rights are allocated and monitored on an individual country basis, which is considered to be the CGU.

The aggregate carrying amounts of goodwill and distribution rights allocated to each CGU are as follows:

 

In millions of Ps.

   2015      2014  

Mexico

   Ps. 55,137       Ps. 55,137   

Guatemala

     410         352   

Nicaragua

     465         418   

Costa Rica

     1,391         1,188   

Panama

     1,033         884   

Colombia

     4,746         5,344   

Venezuela

     621         823   

Brazil

     23,557         29,622   

Argentina

     69         88   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 87,429      Ps. 93,856   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Goodwill and distribution rights are tested for impairments annually. The recoverable amounts of the CGUs are based on value-in-use calculations. Value in use was determined by discounting the future cash flows generated from the continuing use of the CGU.

The foregoing forecasts could differ from the results obtained over time; however, the Company prepares its estimates based on the current situation of each of the CGUs.

 

F-40


Table of Contents

The recoverable amounts are based on value in use. The value in use of CGUs is determined based on the method of discounted cash flows. The key assumptions used in projecting cash flows are: volume, expected annual long-term inflation, and the weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) used to discount the projected flows.

To determine the discount rate, the Company uses the WACC as determined for each of the cash generating units in real terms and as described in following paragraphs.

The estimated discount rates to perform the IAS 36 “Impairment of assets”, impairment test for each CGU consider market participants’ assumptions. Market participants were selected taking into consideration the size, operations and characteristics of the business that are similar to those of the Company.

The discount rates represent the current market assessment of the risks specific to each CGU, taking into consideration the time value of money and individual risks of the underlying assets that have not been incorporated in the cash flow estimates. The discount rate calculation is based on the specific circumstances of the Company and its operating segments and is derived from its WACC. The WACC takes into account both debt and equity. The cost of equity is derived from the expected return on investment by Company’s investors. The cost of debt is based on the interest bearing borrowings Company is obliged to service. Segment-specific risk is incorporated by applying individual beta factors. The beta factors are evaluated annually based on publicly available market data.

Market participant assumptions are important because, not only do they include industry data for growth rates, management also assesses how the CGU’s position, relative to its competitors, might change over the forecasted period.

The key assumptions used for the value-in-use calculations are as follows:

 

   

Cash flows were projected based on actual operating results and the five-year business plan. Cash flows for a further five-year were forecasted maintaining the same stable growth and margins per country of the last year base. The Company believes that this forecasted period is justified due to the non-current nature of the business and past experiences.

 

   

Cash flows after the first ten-year period were extrapolated using a perpetual growth rate equal to the expected annual population growth, in order to calculate the terminal recoverable amount.

 

   

A per CGU-specific Weighted Average Cost of Capital (“WACC”) was applied as a hurdle rate to discount cash flows to get the recoverable amount of the units; the calculation assumes, size premium adjusting.

The key assumptions by CGU for impairment test as of December 31, 2015 were as follows:

 

CGU    Pre-tax
WACC
    Post-tax
WACC
    Expected Annual Long-
Term
Inflation 2016-2025
    Expected Volume Growth
Rates  2016-2025
 

Mexico

     6.7     6.1     3.4     2.1

Colombia

     7.6     6.8     3.0     4.4

Venezuela

     17.8     17.1     72.5     3.9

Costa Rica

     8.2     7.9     4.7     3.9

Guatemala

     10.6     10.0     3.7     4.7

Nicaragua

     13.4     12.8     5.3     6.4

Panama

     7.4     6.8     3.1     5.2

Argentina

     9.8     9.1     22.8     3.4

Brazil

     8.0     7.4     4.9     4.0

 

F-41


Table of Contents

The key assumptions by CGU for impairment test as of December 31, 2014 were as follows:

 

CGU

   Pre-tax
WACC
    Post-tax
WACC
    Expected Annual Long-
Term
Inflation  2015-2024
    Expected Volume Growth
Rates 2015-2024
 

Mexico

     5.5     5.0     3.5     2.3

Colombia

     6.4     5.9     3.0     5.3

Venezuela

     12.9     12.3     51.1     3.9

Costa Rica

     7.7     7.6     4.7     2.7

Guatemala

     10.0     9.4     5.0     4.3

Nicaragua

     12.7     12.2     6.0     2.7

Panama

     7.6     7.2     3.8     4.1

Argentina

     9.9     9.3     22.3     2.5

Brazil

     6.2     5.6     6.0     3.8

The values assigned to the key assumptions represent management’s assessment of future trends in the industry and are based on both external sources and internal sources (historical data). The Company consistently applied its methodology to determine CGU specific WACC’s to perform its annual impairment testing.

Sensitivity to Changes in Assumptions

At December 31, 2015 the Company performed an additional impairment sensitivity calculation, taking into account an adverse change in post-tax WACC, according to the country risk premium, using for each country the relative standard deviation between equity and sovereign bonds and an additional sensitivity to the volume of a 100 basis points and concluded that no impairment would be recorded.

 

CGU

   Change in WACC     Change in Volume
Growth CAGR  (1)
    Effect on Valuation  

Mexico

     +0.7     -1.0     Passes by 7.53x   

Colombia

     +0.9     -1.0     Passes by 5.16x   

Venezuela

     +5.8     -1.0     Passes by 7.08x   

Costa Rica

     +2.4     -1.0     Passes by 2.27x   

Guatemala

     +1.2     -1.0     Passes by 6.41x   

Nicaragua

     +2.6     -1.0     Passes by 3.53x   

Panama

     +0.6     -1.0     Passes by 11.89x   

Argentina

     +5.6     -1.0     Passes by 137.35x   

Brazil

     +1.1     -1.0     Passes by 2.29x   

 

(1) Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)

Note 12. Other non-current assets and other non-current financial assets

12.1 Other Non-Current Assets:

 

     2015      2014  

Non-current prepaid advertising expenses

   Ps. 290       Ps. 326   

Guarantee deposits (1)

     1,031         1,265   

Prepaid bonuses

     122         100   

Advances to acquire property, plant and equipment

     370         988   

Share based payments

     174         276   

Other

     378         290   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 2,365       Ps. 3,245   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) As it is customary in Brazil, the Company is required to collaterize tax, legal and labor contingencies by guarantee deposits.

 

F-42


Table of Contents

12.2 Other Non-Current Financial Assets:

 

     2015      2014  

Non-current accounts receivable to Grupo Estrella Azul (see Note 13)

   Ps. 69       Ps. 59   

Other non-current financial assets

     105         98   

Derivative financial instruments (See Note 19)

     2,221         3,003   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 2,395       Ps. 3,160   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 there are no significant variances between the fair value and the carrying value of long term receivables. The fair value is calculated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows whereby the discount rate is estimated using rates currently offered for receivable of similar amounts and maturities, which is considered to be level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Note 13. Balances and Transactions with Related Parties and Affiliated Companies

Balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties of the Company, have been eliminated on consolidation and are not disclosed in this Note.

The consolidated statements of financial position and consolidated statements of income include the following balances and transactions with related parties and affiliated companies:

 

     2015      2014  

Balances:

     

Assets (current included in accounts receivable)

     

Due from FEMSA and Subsidiaries (see Note 6) (1)(4)

   Ps. 495       Ps. 480   

Due from The Coca-Cola Company (see Note 6) (1)(4)

     1,559         1,584   

Due from Heineken Group (1)

     140         171   

Other receivables (1)

     27         75   

Assets (non-current included in other non-current financial assets)

     

Grupo Estrella Azul (see Note 12)

     69         59   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 2,290       Ps. 2,369   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
       2015      2014  

Liabilities (current included in suppliers and other liabilities and loans)

     

Due to FEMSA and Subsidiaries (3)(4)

   Ps. 1,090       Ps. 1,083   

Due to The Coca-Cola Company (2)(3)(4)

     3,140         4,343   

Due to Heineken Group (3)

     305         389   

Other payables (3)

     686         885   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 5,221      Ps. 6,700   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Presented within accounts receivable.
(2) Recorded within bank loans.
(3) Recorded within accounts payable and suppliers.
(4) Parent

Balances due from related parties are considered to be recoverable. Accordingly, for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, there was no expense resulting from the uncollectibility of balances due from related parties.

 

F-43


Table of Contents

Details of transactions between the Company and other related parties are disclosed as follows:

 

Transactions

   2015      2014      2013  

Income:

        

Sales to affiliated parties

   Ps. 3,803       Ps. 3,502       Ps. 3,271   

Interest income received from Compañía Panameña de Bebidas, S.A.P.I. de C.V.

     —                  61   

Interest income received from BBVA Bancomer, S.A. de C.V.

     13         17         36  

Expenses:

        

Purchases and other expenses of FEMSA

     7,720         7,368         5,200   

Purchases of concentrate from The Coca-Cola Company

     27,330         28,084         25,985   

Purchases of raw material, beer and operating expenses from Heineken

     6,944         6,288         3,734   

Advertisement expense paid to The Coca-Cola Company

     1,316         1,167         1,291   

Interest expense and fees paid to BBVA Bancomer, S.A. de C.V. (1)

     —           4         46   

Purchases to Jugos del Valle

     2,135         1,803         1,814   

Purchase of sugar to Promotora Industrial Azucarera, S.A. de C.V.

     1,236         1,020         956   

Purchase of sugar to Beta San Miguel

     1,264         1,389         1,557   

Purchase of sugar, cans and aluminum lids to Promotora Mexicana de Embotelladores, S.A. de C.V.

     587         567         670   

Purchase of canned products to Industria Envasadora de Queretaro, S.A. de C.V.

     731         591         615   

Purchase of inventories to Leao Alimentos e Bebidas, LTDA

     3,359         2,891         2,123   

Purchase of resin to Industria Mexicana de Reciclaje, S.A. de C.V.

     220         266         —     

Donations to Instituto Tecnologico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey, A.C. (1)

     —           11         69   

Interest expense paid to The Coca-Cola Company

     1         4         60   

Insurance premiums for policies with Grupo Nacional Provincial, S.A.B. (1)

     22         41         16   

Other expenses with related parties

     24         19         44   

 

(1) One or more members of the Board of Directors or senior management of the Company are also members of the Board of Directors or senior management of the counterparties to these transactions.

The benefits and aggregate compensation paid to executive officers and senior management of the Company were as follows:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Current employee benefits

   Ps. 552       Ps. 584       Ps. 770   

Termination benefits

     32         106         5   

Shared based payments

     138         59         273   

Note 14. Balances and Transactions in Foreign Currencies

Assets, liabilities and transactions denominated in foreign currencies are those realized in a currency different from the functional currency of the Company. As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, assets, liabilities and transactions denominated in foreign currencies, expressed in Mexican pesos (contractual amounts) are as follows:

 

     Assets      Liabilities  
Balances    Current      Non-current      Current      Non-current  

As of December 31, 2015

           

U.S. dollars

     9,391         602         1,355         53,916   

Euros

     —           —           22         —     

As of December 31, 2014

           

U.S. dollars

     4,270         727         6,566         51,412   

Euros

     —          —          23         —    

 

F-44


Table of Contents

Transactions

   Revenues      Purchases  of
Raw

Materials
     Interest
Expense
     Other  

Year ended December 31, 2015 U.S. dollars

     569         11,458         1,965         1,301   

Year ended December 31, 2014 U.S. dollars

     606         13,161         1,652         1,741   

Year ended December 31, 2013 U.S. dollars

     409         13,068         432         731   

Mexican peso exchange rates in effect on December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and on April 8, 2016 were as follows:

 

     December 31,      April 8,  
     2015      2014      2013      2016  

U.S. dollar

     17.2065         14.7180         13.0765         17.7600   

Note 15. Post-Employment and Other Non-current Employee Benefits

The Company has various labor liabilities for employee benefits in connection with pension and retirement plans, seniority premiums and post-employment benefits. Benefits vary depending upon the country where the individual employees are located. Presented below is a discussion of the Company’s labor liabilities in Mexico, which comprise the substantial majority of those, recorded in the consolidated financial statements.

During 2014, the Company settled its pension plan in Brazil and consequently recognized the corresponding effects of the settlement as disclosed below.

15.1 Assumptions

The Company annually evaluates the reasonableness of the assumptions used in its labor liability for post-employment and other non-current employee benefits computations. Actuarial calculations for pension and retirement plans and seniority premiums, as well as the associated cost for the period, were determined using the following long-term assumptions to non-hyperinflationary most significant countries:

 

Mexico

   2015     2014     2013  

Financial:

      

Discount rate used to calculate the defined benefit obligation

     7.00     7.00     7.50

Salary increase

     4.50     4.50     4.79

Future pension increases

     3.50     3.50     3.50

Biometric:

      

Mortality

     EMSSA  2009   (1)       EMSSA 2009   (1)       EMSSA82-89   (1)  

Disability

     IMSS-97   (2)       IMSS-97   (2)       IMSS-97   (2)  

Normal retirement age

     60 years        60 years       60 years  

Rest of employee turnover

     BMAR2007   (3)       BMAR2007   (3)       BMAR2007   (3)  

 

(1) EMSSA. Mexican Experience of Social Security (for its initials in Spanish)
(2) IMSS. Mexican Experience of Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (for its initials in Spanish)
(3) BMAR. Actuary experience

In Mexico the methodology used to determine the discount rate was the yield or Internal Rate of Return (“IRR”) which involves a yield curve. In this case, the expected rates of each period were taken from a yield curve of the Mexican Federal Government Treasury Bond (known as CETES in Mexico).

In Mexico upon retirement, the Company purchases an annuity for senior executives, which will be paid according to the option chosen by the employee.

 

F-45


Table of Contents

Based on these assumptions, the amounts of benefits expected to be paid out in the following years are as follows:

 

     Pension and
Retirement Plans
     Seniority
Premiums
 

2016

     180         16   

2017

     191         15   

2018

     176         16   

2019

     168         18   

2020

     245         19   

2021 to 2025

     1,059         136   

15.2 Balances of the liabilities for post-employment and other non-current employee benefits

 

     2015     2014  

Pension and Retirement Plans:

    

Vested benefit obligation

   Ps. 621      Ps. 471   

Non-vested benefit obligation

     1,077        1,390   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

     1,698        1,861   

Excess of projected defined benefit obligation over accumulated benefit obligation

     989        840   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation

     2,687        2,701   

Pension plan funds at fair value

     (864     (872
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net defined benefit liability

   Ps. 1,823      Ps. 1,829   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Seniority Premiums:

    

Vested benefit obligation

   Ps. 16      Ps. 15   

Non-vested benefit obligation

     170        183   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

     186        198   

Excess of projected defined benefit obligation over accumulated benefit obligation

     218        195   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Defined benefit obligation

     404        393   

Seniority premium plan funds at fair value

     (101     (92
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net defined benefit liability

   Ps. 303      Ps. 301   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Post-employment:

    

Vested benefit obligation

   Ps. 135      Ps. 9   

Non-vested benefit obligation

     —          32   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated benefit obligation

     135        41   

Excess of projected defined benefit obligation over accumulated benefit obligation

     —          153   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net defined benefit liability

   Ps. 135      Ps. 194   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total post-employment and other non-current employee benefits

   Ps. 2,261      Ps. 2,324   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

15.3 Trust assets

Trust assets consist of fixed and variable return financial instruments recorded at market value, which are invested as follows:

 

Type of instrument

   2015     2014  

Fixed return:

    

Traded securities

     19     35

Life annuities

     16     20

 

F-46


Table of Contents

Type of instrument

   2015     2014  

Bank instruments

     3     3

Federal government instruments

     45     27

Variable return:

    

Publicly traded shares

     17     15
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     100     100
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

In Mexico, the regulatory framework for pension plans is established in the Income Tax Law and its Regulations, the Federal Labor Law and the Mexican Social Security Institute Law. None of these laws establish minimum funding levels or a minimum required level of contributions.

In Mexico, the Income Tax Law requires that, in the case of private plans, certain notifications must be submitted to the authorities and a certain level of instruments must be invested in the Federal Government, among others.

The Company’s various pension plans have a technical committee that is responsible for verifying the correct operation of the plan with regard to the payment of benefits, actuarial valuations of the plan, and the monitoring and supervision of the trust beneficiary. The committee is responsible for determining the investment portfolio and the types of instruments the fund will be invested in. This technical committee is also responsible for reviewing the correct operation of the plan in all of the countries in which the Company has these benefits.

The risks related to the Company’s employee benefit plans are primarily attributable to the plan assets. The Company’s plan assets are invested in a diversified portfolio, which considers the term of the plan so as to invest in assets whose expected return coincides with the estimated future payments.

Since the Mexican Tax Law limits the plan asset investment to 10% for related parties, this risk is not considered to be significant for purposes of the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries.

In Mexico, the Company’s policy is to invest at least 30% of the fund assets in Mexican Federal Government instruments. Guidelines for the target portfolio have been established for the remaining percentage and investment decisions are made to comply with these guidelines insofar as the market conditions and available funds allow.

In Mexico, the amounts and types of securities of the Company in related parties included in portfolio fund are as follows:

 

     2015      2014  

Mexico

     

Portfolio:

     

Debt:

     

Grupo Televisa, S.A.B. de C.V.

   Ps. 17       Ps. 17   

Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V.

     7         7   

Grupo Industrial Bimbo, S.A.B. de C. V.

     3         3   

Gentera, S.A.B. de C.V.

     8         —    

El Puerto de Liverpool, S.A.B. de C.V.

     5         5   

Capital:

     

Fomento Económico Mexicano, S.A.B de C.V.

     10         10   

Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C. V.

     —          12   

Gruma, S.A.B. de C.V.

     5         —    

Alfa, S.A.B. de C.V.

     13         8   

Grupo Industrial Bimbo, S.A.B. de C.V.

     3         —    

Gentera, S.A.B. de C.V.

     —           7   

The Coca-Cola Company

     —          11   

During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not make significant contributions to the plan assets and does not expect to make material contributions to the plan assets during the following fiscal year.

 

F-47


Table of Contents

15.4 Amounts recognized in the consolidated income statements and the consolidated statements of comprehensive income

 

     Income statement         

2015

   Current
Service Cost
     Past Service
Cost
     Gain or
Loss on
Settlement or
curtailment
    Net Interest on
the Net Defined

Benefit Liability
     Remeasurements
of the Net
Defined Benefit

Liability
net of taxes
 

Pension and retirement plans

   Ps. 142       Ps. —         Ps. (120   Ps. 124       Ps. 429   

Seniority premiums

     45         —           (9     20         33   

Post-employment

     5         —           —          9         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 192       Ps. —         Ps. (129   Ps. 153       Ps. 462   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
     Income statement         

2014

   Current
Service  Cost
     Past Service
Cost
     Gain or
Loss on
Settlement
    Net Interest on
the Net Defined

Benefit Liability
     Remeasurements
of the  Net

Defined Benefit
Liability
net of taxes
 

Pension and retirement plans

   Ps. 137       Ps. 52       Ps. (230   Ps. 201       Ps. 481   

Seniority premiums

     39         —          (27     19         47   

Post-employment

     24         —          —         17         72   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 200       Ps. 52       Ps. (257   Ps. 237       Ps. 600   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 
     Income statement         

2013

   Current
Service  Cost
     Past Service
Cost
     Gain or
Loss on
Settlement
    Net Interest on
the Net Defined

Benefit Liability
     Remeasurements
of the  Net

Defined Benefit
Liability
net of taxes
 

Pension and retirement plans

   Ps. 139       Ps. 8      Ps. (7 )   Ps. 90       Ps. 178   

Seniority premiums

     28         —          —         15         25   

Post-employment

     48         —          —         67         205   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 215       Ps. 8       Ps. (7 )   Ps. 172       Ps. 408   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, service costs of Ps. 192, Ps. 200 and Ps. 215 have been included in the consolidated statements of income as cost of goods sold, administration and selling expenses.

Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability recognized in other comprehensive income are as follows (amounts are net of tax):

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Amount accumulated in other comprehensive income as of the beginning of the periods

   Ps. 600      Ps. 408      Ps 263   

Recognized during the year (obligation liability and plan assets)

     (49     280        180   

Actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in financial assumptions

     (77     87        (19

Foreign exchange rate valuation (gain)

     (12     (175     (16
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amount accumulated in other comprehensive income as of the end of the period, net of tax

   Ps. 462      Ps. 600      Ps. 408   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability include the following:

 

   

The return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in interest expense.

 

   

Actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in demographic assumptions.

 

   

Actuarial gains and losses arising from changes in financial assumptions.

 

F-48


Table of Contents

15.5 Changes in the balance of the defined benefit obligation for post-employment and other non-current employee benefits

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Pension and Retirement Plans:

      

Initial balance

   Ps. 2,701      Ps. 2,666      Ps. 2,394   

Current service cost

     142        137        139   

Effect on settlement

     —          (521     (7

Effect on curtailment

     (120    

Interest expense

     185        198        171   

Actuarial gains or losses

     (58     220        (73

Foreign exchange (gain) loss

     39        41        (55

Benefits paid

     (202     (92     (85

Amendments

     —         —          8   

Acquisitions

     —         —          174   

Past service cost

     —         52        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Ps. 2,687      Ps. 2,701      Ps. 2,666   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Seniority Premiums:

      

Initial balance

     Ps.393      Ps. 353      Ps. 226   

Current service cost

     45        39        28   

Gain or loss on settlement

     —          (27     —     

Effect on curtailment

     (9     —          —     

Interest expense

     26        26        19   

Actuarial losses

     (21     28        7   

Benefits paid

     (30     (26     (26

Acquisitions

     —         —          99   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Ps. 404      Ps. 393      Ps. 353   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Post-employment:

      

Initial balance

     Ps.194      Ps. 743      Ps. 594  

Current service cost

     5        24        48   

Certain liability cost

     73        —          —     

Interest expense

     —         17        67   

Actuarial losses

     —         54        237   

Foreign exchange gain

     (137     (638     (187

Benefits paid

     —          (6     (16
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Ps 135      Ps. 194      Ps. 743   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

15.6 Changes in the balance of trust assets

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Pension and retirement plans:

        

Balance at beginning of year

   Ps. 872       Ps. 1,211       Ps. 1,113   

Actual return on trust assets

     26         70         8   

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

     2         (2      (73

Life annuities

     27         128         18   

Benefits paid

     (63      —          —    

Amendments

     —          —          16   

Acquisitions

     —          —          129   

Effect of settlement

     —          (535 )      —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

   Ps. 864       Ps. 872       Ps. 1,211   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Seniority premiums

        

Balance at beginning of year

   Ps. 92       Ps. 90       Ps. 18   

Actual return on trust assets

     9         2         —    

Acquisitions

     —          —           72  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of year

   Ps. 101       Ps. 92       Ps. 90   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

F-49


Table of Contents

As a result of the Company’s investments in life annuities plan, management does not expect the Company will need to make material contributions to the trust assets in order to meet its future obligations.

15.7 Variation in assumptions

The Company decided that the relevant actuarial assumptions that are subject to sensitivity and valuated through the projected unit credit method, are the discount rate and the salary increase rate. The reasons for choosing these assumptions are as follows:

 

Discount rate: The rate that determines the value of the obligations over time.

 

Salary increase rate: The rate that considers the salary increase which implies an increase in the benefit payable.

The following table presents the impact in absolute terms of a variation of 0.5% in the assumptions on the net defined benefit liability associated with the Company’s defined benefit plans. The sensibility of this 0.5% on the significant actuarial assumptions is based on a projected long-term discount rates to Mexico and a yield curve projections of long-term sovereign bonds:

 

+0.5%:

   Income Statement         

Discount rate used to calculate the

defined benefit obligation and the

net interest on the net defined

benefit liability

   Current
Service Cost
     Past Service
Cost
     Gain or
Loss on
Settlement or
curtailment
    Net Interest on
the Net Defined
Benefit Liability
     Remeasurements
of the Net
Defined Benefit

Liability
 

Pension and retirement plans

   Ps. 133       Ps. —         Ps. (98   Ps. 121       Ps. 396   

Seniority premiums

     42         —           (8     19         46   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 175       Ps. —         Ps. (106   Ps. 140       Ps. 442   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Expected salary increase

   Current
Service Cost
     Past Service
Cost
     Gain or
Loss on
Settlement or
curtailment
    Net Interest on
the Net Defined
Benefit Liability
     Remeasurements
of the Net
Defined Benefit

Liability
 

Pension and retirement plans

   Ps. 153       Ps. —         Ps. (114   Ps. 136       Ps. 379   

Seniority premiums

     47         —           (10     21         44   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 200       Ps. —         Ps. (124   Ps. 157       Ps. 423   

-0.5%:

             

Discount rate used to calculate the

defined benefit obligation and the

net interest on the net defined

benefit liability

   Current
Service Cost
     Past Service
Cost
     Gain or
Loss on
Settlement or
curtailment
    Net Interest on
the Net Defined
Benefit Liability
     Remeasurements
of the Net
Defined Benefit
Liability
 

Pension and retirement plans

   Ps. 153       Ps.         Ps. (114   Ps. 127       Ps. 376   

Seniority premiums

     48            (10     20         43   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 201       Ps.         Ps. (124   Ps. 147       Ps. 419   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Expected salary increase

   Current
Service Cost
     Past Service
Cost
     Gain or
Loss on
Settlement or
curtailment
    Net Interest on
the Net Defined
Benefit Liability
     Remeasurements
of the Net
Defined Benefit

Liability
 

Pension and retirement plans

   Ps. 133       Ps. —         Ps. (98   Ps. 114       Ps. 392   

Seniority premiums

     45         —           (9     19         44   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps. 178       Ps. —         Ps. (107   Ps. 133       Ps. 436   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

F-50


Table of Contents

15.8 Employee benefits expense

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, employee benefits expenses recognized in the consolidated income statements are as follows:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Included in cost of goods sold:

        

Wages and salaries

   Ps. 4,106       Ps. 3,823       Ps. 5,978   

Social security costs

     799         742         837   

Employee profit sharing

     125         141         399   

Pension and seniority premium costs (Note 15.4)

     56         53         51   

Share-based payment expense (Note 16.2)

     4         3         3   

Included in selling and distribution expenses:

        

Wages and salaries

     11,513         11,999         12,878   

Social security costs

     2,911         2,860         2,416   

Employee profit sharing

     453         449         1,181   

Pension and seniority premium costs (Note 15.4)

     65         60         56   

Share-based payment expense (Note 16.2)

     6         3         6   

Included in administrative expenses:

        

Wages and salaries

     2,551         2,937         3,939   

Social security costs

     337         420         504   

Employee profit sharing

     30         50         81   

Pension and seniority premium costs (Note 15.4)

     66         63         60   

Post-employment benefits other (Note 15.4)

     5         24         48   

Share-based payment expense (Note 16.2)

     254         173         184   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total employee benefits expense

   Ps. 23,281       Ps.  23,800       Ps.  28,621   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Note 16. Bonus Programs

16.1 Quantitative and qualitative objectives

The bonus program for executives is based on achieving certain goals established annually by management, which include quantitative and qualitative objectives and special projects.

The quantitative objectives represent approximately 50% of the bonus, and are based on the Economic Value Added (“EVA”) methodology. The objective established for the executives at each entity is based on a combination of the EVA generated per entity and by our Company and the EVA generated by our parent Company FEMSA. The qualitative objectives and special projects represent the remaining 50% of the annual bonus and are based on the critical success factors established at the beginning of the year for each executive.

The bonus amount is determined based on each eligible participant’s level of responsibility and based on the EVA generated by the applicable business unit the employee works for. This formula is established by considering the level of responsibility within the organization, the employees’ evaluation and competitive compensation in the market.

The incentive plan target is expressed in months of salary, and the final amount payable is computed based on a percentage of achievement of the goals established every year. The bonuses are recorded as a part of the income statement and are paid in cash the following year. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 the bonus expense recorded amounted to Ps. 549, Ps. 523 and Ps. 533, respectively.

16.2 Share-based payment bonus plan

The Company has a stock incentive plan for the benefit of its senior executives. This plan uses as its main evaluation metric the EVA. Under the EVA stock incentive plan, eligible employees are entitled to receive a special annual bonus (fixed amount), to purchase FEMSA and Coca-Cola FEMSA shares or options, based on the executive’s responsibility in the organization, their business’ EVA result achieved, and their individual performance. The acquired shares or options are deposited in a trust, and the executives may access them one year after they are vested at 20% per year. The 50% of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s annual executive bonus is to be used to purchase FEMSA shares or options and the remaining 50% to purchase Coca-Cola FEMSA shares or options. As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, no stock options have been granted to employees. Until 2015 the shares were vested ratably over a five year period. Beginning with January 1, 2016 onwards they will ratably vest over a three year period.

The special bonus is granted to the eligible employee on an annual basis and after withholding applicable taxes. The Company contributes the individual employee’s special bonus (after taxes) in cash to the Administrative Trust (which is controlled and consolidated by FEMSA), which then uses the funds to purchase FEMSA and Coca-Cola FEMSA shares (as instructed by the Corporate Practices Committee), which are then allocated to such employee.

Coca-Cola FEMSA accounts for its share-based payment bonus plan as an equity-settled share based payment transaction, since it is its parent company, FEMSA, who ultimately grants and settles with shares these obligations due to executives.

 

F-51


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the shares granted under the Company’s executive incentive plans are as follows:

 

     Number of shares         

Incentive Plan

   FEMSA      KOF      Vesting period  

2012

     956,685         741,245         2013-2015   

2013

     539,020         370,200         2014-2016   

2014

     489,345         331,165         2015-2017   

2015

     457,925         415,375         2016-2018   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

     2,442,975         1,857,985      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the total expense recognized for the period arising from share-based payment transactions, using the grant date model, was of Ps. 264, Ps. 179 and Ps. 193, respectively.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the asset recorded by Coca-Cola FEMSA in its consolidated statements of financial position amounted to Ps. 174 and Ps. 276, respectively, see Note 12.

 

F-52


Table of Contents

Note 17. Bank Loans and Notes Payables

 

           2021 and    

Carrying
Value

December 31,

   

Fair Value at

December 31,

    

Carrying
Value

December 31,

 

(In millions of Mexican pesos)

   2016     2017     2018     2019     2020     Thereafter     2015     2015      2014  

Short-term debt:

                   

Fixed rate debt:

                   

Argentine pesos

                   

Notes payable

   Ps.  165     Ps.  —        Ps. —        Ps.  —        Ps. —        Ps.  —        Ps.  165     Ps.  164      Ps.  301   

Interest rate

     26.2     —          —          —          —          —          26.2     —           30.9

Colombian pesos

                   

Bank loans

   Ps.  219     Ps.  —        Ps.  —        Ps.  —        Ps.  —        Ps. —        Ps.  219     Ps.  220      Ps. —     

Interest rate

     6.5     —          —          —          —          —          6.5     —           —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total short-term debt

   Ps.  384     Ps. —        Ps. —        Ps. —        Ps. —        Ps. —        Ps.  384     Ps.  384      Ps.  301   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Long-term debt:

                   

Fixed rate debt:

                   

Argentine pesos

                   

Bank loans

     18        —          —          —          —          —          18        17         309   

Interest rate

     15.3     —          —          —          —          —          15.3     —           26.9

Brazilian reais

                   

Bank loans

     70        97        98        95        80        111        551        386         233   

Interest rate

     6.8     6.9     6.9     6.9     6.8     5.6     6.6     —           4.6

Capital leases

     67        66        65        62        51        149        460        356         760   

Interest rate

     4.6     4.6     4.6     4.6     4.6     4.6     4.6     —           4.6

U.S. dollars

                   

Senior notes

     —          —          17,158        —          8,566        25,609        51,333        52,990         43,893   

Interest rate

     —          —          2.4     —          4.6     4.4     3.8     —           3.8

Bank loans

     —          —          —          —          —          —          —          —           30   

Interest rate

     —          —          —          —          —          —          —          —           3.9

Mexican pesos

                   

Domestic bonds

     —          —          —          —          —          9,989        9,989        9,527         9,988   

Interest rate

     —          —          —          —          —          6.2     6.2     —           6.2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Subtotal

     155        163        17,321        157        8,697        35,858        62,351        63,276         55,213   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

F-53


Table of Contents
           2021 and     

Carrying
Value

December 31,

   

Fair Value at

December 31,

    

Carrying
Value

December 31,

 
(In millions of Mexican pesos)    2016     2017     2018     2019     2020     Thereafter      2015     2015      2014  

Variable rate debt:

                    

U.S. dollars

                    

Bank loans

     —          —          —          —          —          —           —          —           6,956   

Interest rate

     —          —          —          —          —          —           —          —           0.9

Mexican pesos

                    

Domestic bonds

     2,496        —          —          —          —          —           2,496        2,500         2,473   

Interest rate

     3.6     —          —          —          —          —           3.6     —           3.4

Bank loans

     —          —          —          —          —          —           —          —           —     

Interest rate

     —          —          —          —          —          —           —          —           —     

Argentine pesos

                    

Bank loans

     82        41        —          —          —          —           123        120         232   

Interest rate

     32.2     32.2     —          —          —          —           32.2     —           21.5

Brazilian reais

                    

Bank loans

     107        107        107        107        74        —          502        430         83   

Interest rate

     9.2     9.2     9.2     9.2     9.2     —           9.2     —           7.6

Colombian pesos

                    

Bank loans

     246        628        —          —          —          —           874        861         769   

Interest rate

     6.8     6.4     —          —          —          —           6.5     —           5.9
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Subtotal

     2,931        776        107        107        74        —          3,995        3,911         10,513   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Long-term debt

     3,086        939        17,428        264        8,771        35,858         66,346        67,187         65,726   

Current portion of long term debt

     3,086        —          —         —         —         —          3,086        —           905   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Long-term debt

   Ps.  —       Ps.  939     Ps.  17,428     Ps.  264     Ps.  8,771     Ps.  35,858      Ps.  63,260     Ps.  67,187      Ps.  64,821   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) All interest rates shown in this table are weighted average contractual annual rates.

 

F-54


Table of Contents

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the interest expense related to the bank loans and notes payable is comprised as follows and included in the consolidated income statement under the interest expense caption:

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Interest on debts and borrowings

   Ps. 3,540      Ps. 3,170      Ps. 2,262   

Finance charges payable under capitalized interest

     (60     (117     (59

Finance charges for employee benefits

     155        239        201   

Derivative instruments

     2,619        2,194        738   

Finance operating charges

     83        60        194   

Finance charges payable under finance leases

     —          —          5   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   Ps. 6,337      Ps. 5,546      Ps. 3,341   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Coca-Cola FEMSA has the following debt bonds: a) registered with the Mexican stock exchange: i) Ps. 2,500 (nominal amount) with a maturity date in 2016 and a variable interest rate, ii) Ps. 2,500 (nominal amount) with a maturity date in 2021 and fixed interest rate of 8.27% and iii) Ps. 7,500 (nominal amount) with a maturity date in 2023 and fixed interest rate of 5.46% and b) registered with the SEC : i) Senior notes of US. $ 500 with interest at a fixed rate of 4.63% and maturity date on February 15, 2020, ii) Senior notes of US. $1,000 with interest at a fixed rate of 2.38% and maturity date on November 26, 2018, iii) Senior notes of US. $ 900 with interest at a fixed rate of 3.88% and maturity date on November 26, 2023 and iv) Senior notes of US. $ 600 with interest at a fixed rate of 5.25% and maturity date on November 26, 2043 all of which are guaranteed by our subsidiaries: Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V., Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Distribuidora y Manufacturera del Valle de Mexico, S. de R.L. de C.V (as successor guarantor of Servicios Integrados Inmuebles del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V.) and Yoli de Acapulco, S. de R.L. de C.V. (“Guarantors”). In Note 27 we present supplemental guarantors consolidating financial information.

The Company has financing from different financial institutions under agreements that stipulate different restrictions and covenants, which mainly consist of maximum levels of leverage and capitalization as well as minimum consolidated net worth and debt and interest coverage ratios. As of the date of these consolidated financial statements, the Company was in compliance with all restrictions and covenants contained in its financing agreements.

In December 2015, Coca-Cola FEMSA prepaid in full outstanding Bank loans denominated in U.S. million dollars for a total amount of $450 (nominal amount).

Note 18. Other Income and Expenses

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Other income:

        

Gain on sale of long-lived assets

   Ps. 233       Ps. 150       Ps. 194   

Cancellation of contingencies

     255         697         114   

Other

     132         154         170   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 620       Ps. 1,001       Ps. 478   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Other expenses:

        

Provisions for contingencies from past acquisitions

   Ps. 334       Ps. 232       Ps. 201   

Loss on the retirement of long-lived assets

     332         39         39   

Loss on sale of long-lived assets

     16         183         167   

Other taxes from Colombia

     55         —          —    

Severance payments

     285         272         190   

Donations

     221         66         103   

Foreign exchange losses related to operating activities

     871         172         94   

Other

     254         195         307   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 2,368       Ps. 1,159       Ps. 1,101   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

F-55


Table of Contents

Note 19. Financial Instruments

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company uses a three-level fair value hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. The three input levels are described as follows:

 

 

Level 1: quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

 

 

Level 2 : inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

 

 

Level 3: are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date.

The Company measures the fair value of its financial assets and liabilities classified as level 1 and 2, applying the income approach method, which estimates the fair value based on expected cash flows discounted to net present value. The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

 

     2015      2014  
     Level 1      Level 2      Level 1      Level 2  

Derivative financial instruments (asset)

   Ps. —         Ps. 2,744       Ps. —         Ps. 3,334   

Derivative financial instruments (liability)

     270         4         409         16   

Trust assets of labor obligations

     965         —           964         —    

19.1 Total debt

The fair value of bank and syndicated loans is calculated based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows whereby the discount rate is estimated using rates currently offered for debt of similar amounts and maturities, which is considered to be level 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the Company’s publicly traded debt is based on quoted market prices as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, which is considered to be level 1 in the fair value hierarchy (See Note 17).

19.2 Forward agreements to purchase foreign currency

The Company has entered into forward agreements to reduce its exposure to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations among the Mexican peso and other currencies.

These instruments have been designated as cash flow hedges and are recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position at their estimated fair value which is determined based on prevailing market exchange rates to terminate the contracts at the end of the period. Changes in the fair value of these forwards are recorded as part of “cumulative other comprehensive income”. Net gain/loss on expired contracts is recognized as part of foreign exchange or cost of goods sold, depending on the nature of the hedge in the consolidated income statements.

Net changes in the fair value of forward agreements that do not meet hedging criteria for hedge accounting are recorded in the consolidated income statements under the caption “market value gain/(loss) on financial instruments”.

At December 31, 2015, the Company has the following outstanding forward agreements to purchase foreign currency:

 

     Notional      Fair Value Asset  

Maturity Date

   Amount      Dec. 31, 2015  

2016

   Ps. 4,435       Ps. 383   

 

F-56


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2014, the Company had the following outstanding forward agreements to purchase foreign currency:

 

            Fair Value  
     Notional      (Liability)     Asset  

Maturity Date

   Amount      Dec. 31, 2014  

2015

   Ps.  2,617       Ps.   (16)   Ps.  269  

19.3 Options to purchase foreign currency

The Company has executed call option and collar strategies to reduce its exposure to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations. A call option is an instrument that limits the loss in case of foreign currency depreciation. A collar is a strategy that combines call and put options, limiting the exposure to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations in a similar way as a forward agreement.

These instruments have been designated as cash flow hedges and are recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position at their estimated fair value which is determined based on prevailing market exchange rates to terminate the contracts at the end of the period. Changes in the fair value of these options, corresponding to the intrinsic value, are initially recorded as part of “cumulative other comprehensive income”. Changes in the fair value, corresponding to the extrinsic value, are recorded in the consolidated income statements under the caption “market value gain/ (loss) on financial instruments,” as part of the consolidated net income. Net gain/(loss) on expired contracts including the net premium paid, is recognized as part of cost of goods sold when the hedged item is recorded in the consolidated income statements.

At December 31, 2015, the Company paid a net premium of Ps. 75 millions for the following outstanding call options to purchase foreign currency:

 

Maturity Date

   Notional
Amount
     Fair Value
Asset
Dec. 31, 2015
 

2016

   Ps.  1,612      Ps.  65   

At December 31, 2014, the Company had the following outstanding collars agreements to purchase foreign currency:

 

Maturity Date

   Notional
Amount
     Fair Value
Asset
Dec. 31, 2014
 

2015

   Ps.  402      Ps.  56   

19.4 Cross-currency swaps

The Company has contracted a number of cross-currency swaps to reduce its exposure to risks of exchange rate and interest rate fluctuations associated with its borrowings denominated in U.S. dollars. The fair value is estimated using market prices that would apply to terminate the contracts at the end of the period. For accounting purposes, the cross currency swaps are recorded as both, Cash Flow Hedges in regards to the foreign exchange risk, and Fair Value Hedges in regards to the interest rate risk. The fair value changes related to exchange rate fluctuations of the notional of those cross currency swaps and the accrued interest are recorded in the consolidated income statements. The remaining portion of the fair value changes, when designated as Cash Flow Hedges, are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet in “cumulative other comprehensive income”. If they are designated as Fair Value Hedges the changes in this remaining portion are recorded in the income statements as “market value (gain) loss on financial instruments”.

At December 31, 2015, the Company had the following outstanding cross currency swap agreements:

 

            Fair Value  
     Notional      (Liability)      Asset  

Maturity Date

   Amount      Dec. 31, 2015  

2018

   Ps. 30,714       Ps.  —        Ps. 2,216   

 

F-57


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2014, the Company had the following outstanding cross currency swap agreements:

 

            Fair Value  

Maturity Date

   Notional
Amount
     Asset
Dec 31, 2014
 

2015

   Ps. 30       Ps. 6   

2018

       33,410           3,003   

19.5 Commodity price contracts

The Company has entered into various commodity price contracts to reduce its exposure to the risk of fluctuation in the costs of certain raw material. The fair value is estimated based on the market valuations to terminate the contracts at the end of the period. These instruments are designated as Cash Flow Hedges and the changes in their fair value are recorded as part of “cumulative other comprehensive income”.

The fair value of expired or sold commodity contracts are recorded in cost of goods sold with the hedged items.

At December 31, 2015, the Company had the following sugar price contracts:

 

            Fair Value  
     Notional      (Liability)        

Maturity Date

   Amount      Dec 31, 2015  

2016

   Ps.   1,497       Ps.   (190     —     

At December 31, 2014, the Company had the following sugar price contracts:

 

            Fair Value  
     Notional      (Liability)        

Maturity Date

   Amount      Dec 31, 2014  

2015

   Ps.   1,341       Ps.   (285  

2016

     952         (101     —    

2017

     37         (2 )  

At December 31, 2015, the Company has the following aluminum price contracts:

 

            Fair Value  

Maturity Date

   Notional
Amount
     (Liability)
Dec. 31, 2015
 

2016

   Ps.   436       Ps.   (84

At December 31, 2014, the Company has the following aluminum price contracts:

 

            Fair Value  

Maturity Date

   Notional
Amount
     (Liability)
Dec. 31, 2014
 

2015

   Ps.   361       Ps.   (12

2016

     177         (9

19.6 Derivative financial Instruments for CCFPI acquisition:

The Company’s call option related to the remaining 49% ownership interest in CCFPI is measured at fair value using a Level 3 concept. The call option had an estimated fair value of approximately Ps. 859 million at inception of the option, and approximately Ps. 755 million and Ps. 456 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively. Significant observable inputs into that Level 3 estimate include the call option’s expected term (7 years at inception), risk free rate as expected return (LIBOR), a volatility (14.17%) and the underlying enterprise value of the CCFPI. The enterprise value of CCFPI for the purpose of this estimate was based on CCFPI’s long-term business plan. The Company uses Black & Scholes valuation technique to measure call option value. The Company acquired its 51% ownership interest in CCFPI in January 2013 and continues to integrate CCFPI into its global operations using the equity method of accounting, and currently believes that the underlying exercise price of the call option is “out of the money”. The Level 3 fair value of the Company’s put option related to its 51% ownership interest approximates zero as its exercise price as defined in the contract adjusts proportionately to the underlying fair value of CCFPI.

 

F-58


Table of Contents

The Company estimates that the call option is “out of the money” as of December 31, 2015 and 2014. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the call option is “out of the money” by approximately 13.89% and 17.71% or US$90 million and US$107 million, respectively, with respect to the strike price.

19.7 Net effects of expired contracts that met hedging criteria

 

Type of Derivatives

   Impact in Consolidated
Income Statement
   2015      2014      2013  

Cross-currency swaps (1)

   Interest expense    Ps. 2,595        Ps. —        Ps. —    

Cross-currency swaps (1)

   Foreign exchange        (10,911)         —          —    

Interest rate swaps

   Interest expense      —            137          105    

Forward agreements to purchase foreign currency

   Foreign exchange      —          —            (1,591)   

Option to purchase foreign currency

   Cost of goods sold      (21)         —          (9)  

Forward agreements to purchase foreign currency

   Cost of goods sold      (523)         (22)         (22)   

Commodity price contracts

   Cost of goods sold      619          291          362    

 

(1) This amount corresponds to the settlement of cross currency swaps portfolio in Brazil presented as part of the other financial activities.

19.8 Net effect of changes in fair value of derivative financial instruments that did not meet the hedging criteria for accounting purposes

 

Type of Derivatives

  

Impact in Consolidated Income Statement

   2015      2014      2013  

Forward agreements to purchase foreign currency

   Market value gain (loss) on financial instruments    Ps. 52        Ps.   (1)       Ps.   (20)   

Cross-currency swaps

   Market value (loss) gain on financial instruments      (20)         26          66   

19.9 Net effect of expired contracts that did not meet the hedging criteria for accounting purposes

 

Type of Derivatives

   Impact in Consolidated Income Statement    2015      2014      2013  

Cross-currency swaps

   Market value gain on financial instruments    Ps.   105       Ps. —        Ps. —     

Embedded derivatives

   Market value gain on financial instruments      5           —            —     

19.10 Market risk

The Company’s activities expose it primarily to the financial risks of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and commodity prices. The Company enters into a variety of derivative financial instruments to manage its exposure to foreign currency risk, interest rates risk and commodity prices risk including:

 

 

Forward Agreements to Purchase Foreign Currency in order to reduce its exposure to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations.

 

 

Options to purchase foreign currency in order to reduce its exposure to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations.

 

 

Cross-Currency Swaps in order to reduce its exposure to the risk of exchange rate fluctuations and interest rate changes.

 

 

Commodity price contracts in order to reduce its exposure to the risk of fluctuation in the costs of certain raw materials.

 

F-59


Table of Contents

The Company tracks the fair value (mark to market) of its derivative financial instruments and its possible changes using scenario analyses. The following disclosures provide a sensitivity analysis of the market risks, which the Company is exposed to as it relates to foreign exchange rates, interests rates and commodity prices, which it considers in its existing hedging strategy:

 

Forward Agreements to Purchase USD (MXN/USD)

   Change in U.S.$ Rate     Effect on
Equity
    Effect on
Profit  orLoss
 

2015

     (11 %)    Ps. (197   Ps. —    

2014

     (7 %)      (99     —    

2013

     (11 %)      (67     —    

Forward Agreements to Purchase USD (BRL/USD)

   Change in U.S.$ Rate     Effect on
Equity
    Effect on
Profit or Loss
 

2015

     (21 %)    Ps. (387   Ps. —    

2014

     (14 %)      (96     —    

2013

     (13 %)      (86     —    

Forward Agreements to Purchase USD (COP/USD)

   Change in U.S.$ Rate     Effect on
Equity
    Effect on
Profit or Loss
 

2015

     (17 %)    Ps. (113   Ps. —    

2014

     (9 %)      (33     —    

2013

     (6 %)      (19     —    

Forward Agreements to Purchase USD (ARS/USD)

   Change in U.S.$ Rate     Effect on
Equity
    Effect on
Profit or Loss
 

2015

     (36 %)    Ps. (231   Ps. —    

2014

     (11 %)      (22     —    

Options to Purchase Foreign Currency (MXN/USD)

   Change in U.S.$ Rate     Effect on
Equity
    Effect on
Profit or Loss
 

2015

     (11 %)    Ps. (57   Ps. —    

2014

     (7 %)      (20     —    

Options to Purchase Foreign Currency (COP/USD)

   Change in U.S.$ Rate     Effect on
Equity
    Effect on
Profit or Loss
 

2015

     (17 %)    Ps. (9   Ps. —    

2014

     (9 %)      (9     —    

Cross Currency Swaps (USD into MXN)

   Change in U.S.$ Rate     Effect on
Equity
    Effect on
Profit or Loss
 

2015

     (11 %)    Ps. —       Ps. (938

2014

     (7 %)      —         (481

2013

     (11 %)      —         (392

Cross Currency Swaps (USD into BRL)

   Change in U.S.$ Rate     Effect on
Equity
    Effect on
Profit or Loss
 

2015

     (21 %)    Ps. (4,517 )   Ps. (1,086

2014

     (14 %)      —         (3,935

2013

     (13 %)      —         (3,719

Sugar Price Contracts

   Change in Sugar price     Effect on
Equity
    Effect on
Profit or Loss
 

2015

     (31 %)    Ps. (406   Ps. —    

2014

     (27 %)      (528     —    

2013

     (18 %)      (298     —    

 

F-60


Table of Contents

Aluminum Price Contracts

   Change in Aluminum price     Effect on
Equity
    Effect on
Profit or  Loss
 

2015

     (18 %)    Ps.   (58   Ps. —    

2014

     (17 %)      (87       —    

2013

     (19 %)      (36     —    

19.11 Interest rate risk

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk because it and its subsidiaries borrow funds at both fixed and variable interest rates. The risk is managed by the Company by maintaining an appropriate mix between fixed and variable rate borrowings, and by the use of the different derivative financial instruments. Hedging activities are evaluated regularly to align with interest rate views and defined risk appetite, ensuring the most cost-effective hedging strategies are applied.

The following disclosures provide a sensitivity analysis of the interest rate risks, management considered to be reasonably possible at the end of the reporting period, which the Company is exposed to as it relates to its fixed and floating rate borrowings, which considers its existing hedging strategy:

 

Interest Rate Risk

   Change in U.S.$ Rate      Effect on
Profit or  Loss
 

2015

     +100 bps       Ps. (175)  

2014

     +100 bps           (231)   

2013

     +100 bps.         (239)   

19.12 Liquidity risk

The Company’s principal source of liquidity has generally been cash generated from its operations. A significant majority of the Company’s sales are on a short-term credit basis. The Company has traditionally been able to rely on cash generated from operations to fund its capital requirements and its capital expenditures. The Company’s working capital benefits from the fact that most of its sales are made on a cash basis, while it’s generally pays its suppliers on credit. In recent periods, the Company has mainly used cash generated operations to fund acquisitions. The Company has also used a combination of borrowings from Mexican and international banks and issuances in the Mexican and international capital markets to fund acquisitions.

Ultimate responsibility for liquidity risk management rests with the Company’s board of directors, which has established an appropriate liquidity risk management framework for the evaluation of the Company’s short-, medium- and long-term funding and liquidity requirements. The Company manages liquidity risk by maintaining adequate reserves, and continuously monitoring forecasted and actual cash flows and by maintaining a conservative debt maturity profile.

The Company has access to credit from national and international bank institutions in order to face treasury needs; besides, the Company has the highest rating for Mexican companies (AAA) given by independent rating agencies, allowing the Company to evaluate capital markets in case it needs resources.

As part of the Company’s financing policy, management expects to continue financing its liquidity needs with cash from operations. Nonetheless, as a result of regulations in certain countries in which the Company operates, it may not be beneficial or, as in the case of exchange controls in Venezuela, practicable to remit cash generated in local operations to fund cash requirements in other countries. Exchange controls like those in Venezuela may also increase the real price of remitting cash from operations to fund debt requirements in other countries. In the event that cash from operations in these countries is not sufficient to fund future working capital requirements and capital expenditures, management may decide, or be required, to fund cash requirements in these countries through local borrowings rather than remitting funds another country. In addition, the Company’s liquidity in Venezuela could be affected by changes in the rules applicable to exchange rates as well as other regulations, such as exchange controls. In the future management may finance our working capital and capital expenditure needs with short-term or other borrowings.

The Company’s management continuously evaluates opportunities to pursue acquisitions or engage in strategic transactions. The Company would expect to finance any significant future transactions with a combination of cash from operations, long-term indebtedness and capital stock.

See Note 17 for a disclosure of the Company’s maturity dates associated with its non-current financial liabilities as of December 31, 2015.

 

F-61


Table of Contents

The following table reflects all contractually fixed and variable pay-offs for settlement, repayments and interest resulting from recognized financial liabilities. It includes expected gross cash outflows from derivative financial liabilities that are in place as per December 31, 2015.

Such expected net cash outflows are determined based on each particular settlement date of an instrument. The amounts disclosed are undiscounted net cash outflows for the respective upcoming fiscal years, based on the earliest date on which the Company could be required to pay. Cash outflows for financial liabilities (including interest) without fixed amount or timing are based on economic conditions (like interest rates and foreign exchange rates) existing at December 31, 2015.

 

(In millions of Ps)

   2016      2017      2018     2019      2020      2021 and
thereafter
 

Non-derivative financial liabilities:

                

Notes and bonds

   Ps.   5,104       Ps. 2,565       Ps.   19,689      Ps.   2,156       Ps.   10,391       Ps.   50,845   

Loans from banks

     1,094         958         250        230         163         122   

Obligations under finance leases

     85         82         78        73         58         160   

Derivatives financial liabilities

     2,377           2,410         (385     —           —           —     

The Company generally makes payments associated with its non-current financial liabilities with cash generated from its operations.

19.13 Credit risk

Credit risk refers to the risk that counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Company. The Company has adopted a policy of only dealing with creditworthy counterparties, where appropriate, as a means of mitigating the risk of financial loss from defaults. The Company only transacts with entities that are rated the equivalent of investment grade and above. This information is supplied by independent rating agencies where available and, if not available, the Company uses other publicly available financial information and its own trading records to rate its major customers. The Company’s exposure and the credit ratings of its counterparties are continuously monitored and the aggregate value of transactions is spread amongst approved counterparties.

The Company has a high receivable turnover; hence management believes credit risk is minimal due to the nature of its businesses, which have a large portion of their sales settled in cash.

The credit risk on derivative financial instruments is limited because the counterparties are banks with high credit-ratings assigned by international credit-rating agencies.

The Company manages the credit risk related to its derivative portfolio by only entering into transactions with reputable and credit-worthy counterparties as well as by maintaining a Credit Support Annex (CSA) that establishes margin requirements. As of December 31, 2015 the Company concluded that the maximum exposure to credit risk related with derivative financial instruments is not significant given the high credit rating of its counterparties.

Note 20. Non-Controlling Interest in Consolidated Subsidiaries

An analysis of Coca-Cola FEMSA’s non-controlling interest in its consolidated subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

 

     2015      2014      2013  

Mexico

   Ps.   3,342       Ps.   3,614       Ps.   3,309   

Colombia

     12         15         16   

Brazil

     632         772         717   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 3,986       Ps. 4,401       Ps. 4,042   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-controlling interests in Mexico primarily represent the individual results of a Mexican holding company Kristine Oversease, S.A.P.I. de C.V. This entity also has non-controlling stakes in certain Brazilian subsidiaries.

 

F-62


Table of Contents

The changes in the Coca-Cola FEMSA’s non-controlling interest were as follows:

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Balance at beginning of the year

   Ps.   4,401      Ps.   4,042      Ps.   3,179   

Net income of non controlling interest (1)

     94        424        239   

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

     (554     (21     212   

Remeasurements of the net defined employee benefit liability

     6        (21     (7

Valuation of the effective portion of derivative financial instruments, net of taxes

     50        (5     (44

Increase in shares of non-controlling interest

     —         —         515   

Dividends paid

     (11     (18     (52
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of the year

   Ps.   3,986      Ps.   4,401      Ps.   4,042   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) For the years ended at 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company’s net income allocated to non-controlling interest was Ps. 94, Ps. 424, and Ps. 239, respectively.

Note 21. Equity

21.1 Equity accounts

As of December 31, 2015, the capital stock of Coca-Cola FEMSA is represented by 2,072,922,229 common shares, with no par value. Fixed capital stock is Ps. 922 (nominal value) and variable capital is unlimited.

The characteristics of the common shares are as follows:

 

 

Series “A” and series “D” shares are ordinary, have all voting rights and are subject to transfer restrictions;

 

 

Series “A” shares may only be acquired by Mexican individuals and may not represent less than 51% of the ordinary shares.

 

 

Series “D” shares have no foreign ownership restrictions and may not represent more than 49% of the ordinary shares.

 

 

Series “L” shares have no foreign ownership restrictions and have limited voting rights.

As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the number of each share series representing Coca-Cola FEMSA’s capital stock is comprised as follows:

 

     Thousands of Shares  

Series of shares

   2015      2014      2013  

“A”

     992,078         992,078         992,078   

“D”

     583,546         583,546         583,546   

“L”

     497,298         497,298         497,298   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
     2,072,922         2,072,922         2,072,922   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The changes in the share are as follows:

 

     Thousands of Shares  

Series of shares

   2015      2014      2013  

Initial shares

     2,072,922         2,072,922         2,030,544   

Shares issuance

     —          —          42,378   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Final shares

     2,072,922         2,072,922         2,072,922   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The net income of the Company is subject to the legal requirement that 5% thereof be transferred to a legal reserve until such reserve amounts to 20% of capital stock at nominal value. This reserve may not be distributed to shareholders during the existence of the Company. As of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, this reserve is Ps. 164 for the three years.

Retained earnings and other reserves distributed as dividends, as well as the effects derived from capital reductions, are subject to income tax at the rate in effect at the date of distribution, except for restated shareholder contributions and distributions made from net consolidated taxable income, denominated “Cuenta de Utilidad Fiscal Neta” (“CUFIN”).

 

F-63


Table of Contents

Dividends paid in excess of CUFIN are subject to income tax at a grossed-up rate based on the current statutory rate. Since 2003, this tax may be credited against the income tax of the year in which the dividends are paid, and in the following two years against the income tax and estimated tax payments. As of December 31, 2015, the Company’s balances of CUFIN amounted to Ps. 10,908.

For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 the dividends declared and paid per share by the Company are as follows:

 

Series of shares

   2015 (1)      2014      2013  

“A”

   Ps. 3,065       Ps. 2,877       Ps. 2,877   

“D”

     1,803         1,692         1,692   

“L”

       1,537           1,443           1,381   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 
   Ps. 6,405       Ps. 6,012       Ps. 5,950   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) At an ordinary shareholders’ meeting of Coca-Cola FEMSA held on March 12, 2015, the shareholders declared a dividend of Ps. 6,405 that was paid in May 5, 2015 and November 3, 2015. Represents a dividend of Ps. 3.09 per each ordinary share.

21.2 Capital management

The Company manages its capital to ensure that its subsidiaries will be able to continue as going concerns while maximizing the return to shareholders through the optimization of its debt and equity balance in order to obtain the lowest cost of capital available. The Company manages its capital structure and makes adjustments to it in light of changes in economic conditions. To maintain or adjust the capital structure, the Company may adjust the dividend payment to shareholders, return capital to shareholders or issue new shares. No changes were made in the objectives, policies or processes for managing capital during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014.

The Company is not subject to any externally imposed capital requirements, other than the legal reserve and debt covenants (see Note 17 and Note 21.1).

The Company’s finance committee reviews the capital structure of the Company on a quarterly basis. As part of this review, the committee considers the cost of capital and the risks associated with each class of capital. In conjunction with this objective, the Company seeks to maintain the highest achievable credit rating both nationally and internationally and is currently rated AAA in a national scale and A- in a global scale. To maintain the current ratings, the Company has to at least stay at a debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) ratio of 2. A sustained increase above this level could result in a one notch downgrade. As a result, prior to entering into new business ventures, acquisitions or divestures, management evaluates the optimal ratio of debt to EBITDA in order to maintain its credit rating.

Note 22. Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share amounts are calculated by dividing consolidated net income for the year attributable to controlling interest by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period adjusted for the weighted average of own shares purchased in the period.

Basic earnings per share amounts are as follows:

 

     2015  
     Per Series
“A” Shares
     Per Series
“D” Shares
     Per Series
“L” Shares
 

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 4,943       Ps. 2,908       Ps. 2,478   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

     4,898         2,881         2,456   

Weighted average number of shares for basic earnings per share (millions of shares)

     992         584         497   

 

F-64


Table of Contents
     2014  
     Per Series
“A” Shares
     Per Series
“D” Shares
     Per Series
“L” Shares
 

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 5,248       Ps. 3,087       Ps. 2,631   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

     5,045         2,968         2,529   

Weighted average number of shares for basic earnings per share (millions of shares)

     992         584         497   
     2013  
     Per Series
“A” Shares
     Per Series
“D” Shares
     Per Series
“L” Shares
 

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 5,685       Ps. 3,343       Ps. 2,754   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Consolidated net income attributable to equity holders of the parent

       5,569           3,276           2,698   

Weighted average number of shares for basic earnings per share (millions of shares)

     992         584         481   

Note 23. Income Taxes

23.1 Income Tax

The major components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are:

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Current tax expense:

      

Current year

   Ps. 6,060      Ps. 5,002      Ps. 5,889   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax expense:

      

Origination and reversal of temporary differences

     721        1,808        (4

(Benefit) utilization of tax losses recognized

     (2,230     (2,949     (154
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax expense

     (1,509     (1,141     (158
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax expense in consolidated net income

   Ps. 4,551      Ps. 3,861      Ps. 5,731   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2015

   Mexico     Foreign     Total  

Current tax expense:

      

Current year

   Ps. 3,887      Ps. 2,173      Ps. 6,060   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax expense:

      

Origination and reversal of temporary differences

     427        294        721   

(Benefit) utilization of tax losses recognized

     (997     (1,233     (2,230
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax expense (benefit)

     (570     (939     (1,509
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax expense in consolidated net income

   Ps. 3,317      Ps. 1,234      Ps. 4,551   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

2014

   Mexico     Foreign     Total  

Current tax expense:

      

Current year

   Ps. 2,974      Ps. 2,028      Ps. 5,002   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax expense:

      

Origination and reversal of temporary differences

     (249     2,057        1,808   

Benefit of tax losses recognized

     (490     (2,459     (2,949
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax expense (benefit)

     (739     (402     (1,141
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax expense in consolidated net income

   Ps. 2,235      Ps. 1,626      Ps. 3,861   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-65


Table of Contents

2013

   Mexico     Foreign     Total  

Current tax expense:

      

Current year

   Ps. 2,949      Ps. 2,940      Ps. 5,889   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax expense:

      

Origination and reversal of temporary differences

       (311     307        (4

Benefit of tax losses recognized

     (24       (130       (154
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax expense (benefit)

     (335     177        (158
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax expense in consolidated net income

   Ps. 2,614      Ps. 3,117      Ps. 5,731   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Recognized in Consolidated Statement of Other Comprehensive Income (OCI)

 

Income tax related to items charged or recognized directly in OCI during the year:

   2015     2014     2013  

Unrealized gain on cash flow hedges

   Ps. (19   Ps. 99      Ps. (147

Unrealized gain on available for sale securities

     —          —          (1

Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability

     32        (51     (75
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax recognized in OCI

   Ps. 13      Ps. 48      Ps. (223
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance of income tax included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) as of:

 

Income tax related to items charged or recognized directly in OCI as of year end:

   2015     2014     2013  

Unrealized gain on derivative financial instruments

   Ps. (91   Ps. (107   Ps. (208

Unrealized gain on available for sale securities

     —         —         —    
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods

     (91     (107     (208
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Re-measurements of the net defined benefit liability

     (112     (167     (196
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance of income tax in OCI

   Ps. (203   Ps. (274   Ps. (404
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

A reconciliation between tax expense and income before income taxes and share of the profit or loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method multiplied by the Mexican domestic tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Mexican statutory income tax rate

     30     30     30

Income tax from prior years

     0.50        0.09       (0.96 )

Loss on monetary position for subsidiaries in hyperinflationary economies

     0.07        0.62       0.68  

Annual inflation tax adjustment

     (2.22     (3.29 )     0.05  

Non-deductible expenses

     2.92        2.58       0.77  

Non-taxable income

     (0.41     (0.99 )     (0.19 )

Income taxed at a rate other than the Mexican statutory rate

     0.75        0.84       1.85  

Effect of restatement of tax values

     (1.16     (1.97 )     (1.39 )

Effect of change in statutory rate

     0.11        0.09       (0.21 )

Effect of changes in Mexican Tax Law

     —         —         0.48  

Other

     0.35        (2.15 )     2.19  
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     30.91     25.82     33.27
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-66


Table of Contents

Deferred income tax

An analysis of the temporary differences giving rise to deferred income tax liabilities (assets) is as follows:

 

    

Consolidated Statement

of Financial Position as of

    Consolidated Income Statement  

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

   2015     2014     2015     2014     2013  

Allowance for doubtful accounts

   Ps. (95   Ps. (122   Ps. 2      Ps. 5      Ps. (8

Inventories

     138        148        (15     117        22   

Prepaid expenses

     78        82        7        (24     108   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     (204     (45     (96     (544     (537

Investments in associates companies and joint ventures

     —         —         —          —          3   

Other assets

     (561     (609     41        (449     110   

Finite useful lived intangible assets

     285        193        112        (30     111   

Indefinite lived intangible assets

     44        74        (26     (153     166   

Post-employment and other non-current employee benefits

     (235     (340     115        (85     48   

Derivative financial instruments

     24        3        22        (10     19   

Contingencies

     (1,052     (1,309     (7     (458     (109

Employee profit sharing payable

     (152     (149     (3     15        (12

Tax loss carryforwards

     (4,823     (3,126     (2,230     (2,948     (154

Cumulative other comprehensive income

     (222     (274     —         —         —    

Deductible tax goodwill of business acquisition

     (1,270     (3,334     1,378        1,775       203  

Liabilities of amortization of goodwill of business acquisition

     4,147        5,255        (32     (12 )     —    

Other liabilities

     923        1,682        (777     1,660        (128
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax (income)

       Ps. (1,509 )   Ps. (1,141   Ps. (158
      

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
          

Deferred tax, asset

   Ps. (4,098   Ps. (2,956      

Deferred tax, liability

     1,123        1,085         

Deferred income taxes, net

   Ps. (2,975   Ps. (1,871      
  

 

 

   

 

 

       

The changes in the balance of the net deferred income tax liability are as follows:

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Balance at beginning of the year

   Ps. (1,871   Ps. (439   Ps. (597

Deferred tax provision for the year

     (1,526     (1,155     (121

Change in the statutory rate

     16        14        (37

Acquisition of subsidiaries, see Note 4

     —          (445     491   

Effects in equity:

      

Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative financial instruments

     (19     99        (147

Unrealized gain on available for sale securities

     —          —          (1

Cumulative translation adjustment

     350        99        (2

Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability

     32        (51     (75

Effect of foreign currency exchanges rates

     43        7        50   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of the year

   Ps. (2,975   Ps. (1,871   Ps. (439
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The Company offsets tax assets and liabilities if and only if it has a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets and current tax liabilities and the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities related to income taxes levied by the same tax authority.

Tax Loss Carryforwards

The subsidiaries in Mexico, Colombia and Brazil have tax loss carryforwards. Unused tax loss carryforwards, for which a deferred income tax asset has been recognized, may be recovered provided certain requirements are fulfilled. The tax losses carryforwards and their years of expiration are as follows:

 

     Tax Loss
Carryforwards
 

2020

   Ps. 9   

2021

     —     

2022

     10   

2023

     —     

2024 and thereafter

     5,057   

No expiration (Brazil and Colombia)

     9,824   
  

 

 

 
   Ps. 14,900   
  

 

 

 

 

F-67


Table of Contents

During 2013 the Company completed certain acquisitions in Brazil as disclosed in Note 4. In connection with those acquisition the Company recorded certain goodwill balances that are deductible for Brazilian income tax reporting purposes. The deduction of such goodwill amortization has resulted in the creation of Net Operating Losses (NOLs) in Brazil. NOLs in Brazil have no expiration, but their usage is limited to 30% of Brazilian taxable income in any given year. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 the Company believes that it is more likely than not that it will ultimately recover such NOLs through the reversal of temporary differences and future taxable income. Accordingly no valuation allowance has been provided.

During 2015, the Company also generated in Mexico in 2015 as a result of adverse exchange rate fluctuations that impacted the Company’s 2015 effective income tax rate. These NOL’s expire as indicated the table above.

The changes in the balance of tax loss carryforwards are as follows:

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Balance at beginning of the year

   Ps. 9,400      Ps. 537      Ps. 75   

Increase (see sources above)

     7,001        8,912        641   

Usage of tax losses

     (37     (94     (177

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates

     (1,464     45        (2
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of the year

   Ps. 14,900      Ps. 9,400      Ps. 537   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

There were no withholding taxes associated with the payment of dividends in either 2015, 2014 or 2013 by the Company to its shareholders.

The Company has determined that undistributed profits of its subsidiaries, joint ventures or associates will not be distributed in the foreseeable future. The temporary differences associated with investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures that have not been recognized, aggregate to December 31, 2015: Ps. 8,014, December 31, 2014: Ps. 7,326 and, December 31, 2013: Ps. 8,852.

On January 1, 2014 an amendment to the Mexican income tax law became effective. The most important effects in the Company involve changes in the income tax rate, which shall be of 30% in 2014.

During 2014, the Company took advantage of a Brazilian tax amnesty program. The settlement of certain outstanding matters under that amnesty program generated a benefit of Ps. 455 which is reflected in other income during the year ended December 31, 2014.

23.2 Other taxes

The operations in Guatemala, Nicaragua, Colombia and Argentina are subject to a minimum tax, which is based primary on a percentage of assets. Any payments are recoverable in future years, under certain conditions.

23.3 Tax Reform

On November 18, 2014, a tax reform became effective in Venezuela. This reform included changes on how the carrying value of operating losses is reported. The reform established that operating losses carried forward year over year (but limited to three fiscal years) may not exceed 25% of the taxable income in the relevant period. The reform also eliminated the possibility to carry over losses relating to inflationary adjustments and included changes that grant Venezuelan tax authorities broader powers and authority in connection with their ability to enact administrative rulings related to income tax withholding and to collect taxes and increase fines and penalties for tax-related violations, including the ability to confiscate assets without a court order.

On December 30, 2015, the Venezuelan government published a tax reform for 2016 which establishes: (i) a new tax on financial transactions that will be effective beginning February 1, 2016, for those identified as “special taxpayers” at a rate of 0.75% over certain financial transactions, including bank withdraws, transfers of bonds and securities, payments of debts not utilizing a bank account and forgiveness of debt; and (ii) elimination of inflationary effects on calculations of income tax.

In Guatemala, the income tax rate for 2014 was 28.0% and it decreased for 2015 to 25.0%, as scheduled.

 

F-68


Table of Contents

In 2009 Nicaragua established rules related with transfer pricing. This obligation originally would be enacted on January 1, 2016, but the National Assembly passed an amendment to postpone the measure until June 30, 2017.

In Brazil, since July 2015, all the financial revenues (except exchange variance) have been subjected to Federal Social Contributions at the rate of 4.65%.

Also in Brazil, starting 2016 the rates of value-added tax in certain states will be changed as follows: Mato Grosso do Sul – from 17% to 20%; Minas Gerais - the tax rate will remain at 18% but there will be an additional 2% as a contribution to poverty eradication just for the sales to non-taxpayer (final consumers); Rio de Janeiro - the contribution related to poverty eradication fund will be increased from 1% to 2% effectively in April; Paraná - the rate will be reduced to 16% but a rate of 2% as a contribution to poverty eradication will be charged on sales to non-taxpayers. Besides, specifically for beers, the increase of value-added tax rate will be slight superior.

Additionally in Brazil, starting on January 1, 2016, the rates of federal production tax will be reduced and the rates of the federal sales tax will be increased. The Company estimates the average of these taxes over the net sales would move from 14.4% in 2015 to 15.5% in 2016.

Note 24. Other Liabilities, Provisions and Commitments

24.1 Other current financial liabilities

 

     2015      2014  

Sundry creditors

   Ps.  837       Ps.  1,569   

Derivative financial instruments

     274         313   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps.  1,111       Ps.  1,882   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
24.2 Provisions and other non-current liabilities      
     2015      2014  

Provisions

   Ps.  3,317       Ps.  4,168   

Taxes payable

     326         270   

Other

     533         889   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps.  4,176       Ps.  5,327   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
24.3 Other non-current financial liabilities      
     2015      2014  

Derivative financial instruments

   Ps.  —         Ps.  112   

Security deposits

     214         176   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps.  214       Ps.  288   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

24.4 Provisions recorded in the consolidated statement of financial position

The Company has various loss contingencies, and has recorded reserves as other liabilities for those legal proceedings for which it believes an unfavorable resolution is probable. The following table presents the nature and amount of the loss contingencies recorded as of December 31, 2015 and 2014:

 

     2015      2014  

Taxes

   Ps.  1,658       Ps.  2,198   

Labor

     1,340         1,543   

Legal

     319         427   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps.  3,317       Ps.  4,168   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

F-69


Table of Contents

24.5. Changes in the balance of provisions recorded

24.5.1 Taxes

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Balance at beginning of the year

   Ps.  2,198      Ps.  3,147      Ps.  921   

Penalties and other charges

     21        89        1   

New contingencies

     84        10        217   

Cancellation and expiration

     (205     (327     (5

Contingencies added in business combinations

     —          1,191        2,108   

Payments

     (214     (1,255     (31

Brazil tax amnesty

     —          (599     —    

Effect of foreign currency exchange rates

     (226     (58     (64
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of the year

   Ps.  1,658      Ps.  2,198      Ps.  3,147   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

24.5.2 Labor

 

     2015     2014     2013  

Balance at beginning of the year

   Ps.  1,543      Ps.  1,021      Ps.  934   

Penalties and other charges

     209        107        139   

New contingencies

     44        145        187   

Cancellation and expiration

     (102     (53     (226

Contingencies added in business combinations

     —          442        114   

Payments

     (111     (57     (69

Effects of foreign currency exchange rates

     (243     (62     (58
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of the year

   Ps.  1,340      Ps.  1,543      Ps.  1,021   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

A roll forward for legal contingencies is not disclosed because the amounts are not considered to be material.

While provision for all claims has already been made, the actual outcome of the disputes and the timing of the resolution cannot be estimated by the Company at this time.

24.6 Unsettled lawsuits

The Company has entered into several proceedings with its labor unions, tax authorities and other parties that primarily involve Coca-Cola FEMSA and its subsidiaries. These proceedings have resulted in the ordinary course of business and are common to the industry in which the Company operates. Such contingencies were classified by the Company as less than probable but not remote, the estimated amount as of December 31, 2015 of these lawsuits is Ps. 24,916, however, the Company believes that the ultimate resolution of such proceedings will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial position or result of operations.

The Company has tax contingencies, amounting to approximately Ps. 19,133 with loss expectations assessed by management and supported by the analysis of legal counsel which it considers possible. Among these possible contingencies, are Ps. 5,770 in various tax disputs related primarily to credits for ICMS (VAT) and Tax credits over raw materials acquired from Free Trade Zone Manaus IPI. Possible claims also include Ps. 11,613 related to the disallowance of IPI credits on the acquisition of inputs from the Manaus Free Trade Zone. Possible claims also include Ps. 1,348 related to compensation of federal taxes not approved by the IRS (Tax authorities). Finally, possible claims include Ps. 402 related to the requirement by the Tax Authorities of State of São Paulo for ICMS (VAT), interest and penalty due to the alleged underpayment of tax arrears for the period 1994-1996. The Company is defending its position in these matters and final decision is pending in court.

 

F-70


Table of Contents

In recent years in its Mexican and Brazilian territories, Coca-Cola FEMSA has been requested to present certain information regarding possible monopolistic practices. These requests are commonly generated in the ordinary course of business in the soft drink industry where this subsidiary operates. The Company does not expect any material liability to arise from these contingencies.

24.7 Collateralize contingencies

As is customary in Brazil, the Company has been required by the tax authorities there to collateralize tax contingencies currently in litigation amounting to Ps. 3,569, Ps. 3,026 and Ps. 2,248 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, by pledging fixed assets and entering into available lines of credit covering the contingencies.

24.8 Commitments

As of December 31, 2015, the Company has contractual commitments for financing leases for machinery and transport equipment and operating leases for the rental of production machinery and equipment, distribution and computer equipment.

The contractual maturities of the operating leases commitments by currency, expressed in Mexican pesos as of December 31, 2015, are as follows:

 

     Mexican
pesos
     U.S.
dollars
     Other  

Not later than 1 year

   Ps.  113       Ps.  87       Ps.  1   

Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years

     484         361         13   

Later than 5 years

     262         177         2   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   Ps.  859       Ps.  625       Ps.  16  
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Rental expense charged to consolidated net income was Ps. 1,044, Ps. 940 and Ps. 949 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Future minimum lease payments under finance leases with the present value of the net minimum lease payments are as follows:

 

     2015      Present      2014      Present  
     Minimum      value of      Minimum      value of  
     payments      payments      payments      payments  

Not later than 1 year

   Ps.  71       Ps.  67       Ps.  255       Ps.  222   

Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years

     259         244         501         474   

Later than 5 years

     166         149         62         64   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total minimum lease payments

     496         460         818         760   

Less amount representing finance charges

     36         —          58         —    
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Present value of minimum lease payments

   Ps.  460          Ps.  760      
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Company has firm commitments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment of Ps. 92 as December 31, 2015.

Note 25. Information by Segment

The Company’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews periodically reviews financial information at the country level. Thus, each of the separate countries in which the Company operates are considered operating segments, with the exception of Central America which represents a single operating segment.

The Company has aggregated operating segments into the following reporting segments for the purposes of its consolidated financial statements: (i) Mexico and Central America division (comprising the following countries: Mexico (including corporate operations), Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama) and (ii) the South America division (comprising the following countries: Brazil, Argentina, Colombia and Venezuela). Venezuela operates in an economy with exchange control and hyper-inflation; and as a result, IAS 29, “Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies” does not allow its aggregation into the South America segment and (iii) the Asian division comprised of the Company’s equity method investment in CCFPI (Philippines) which was acquired in January 2013 (see Note 9).

The Company is of the view that the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the aggregated operating segments are similar in nature for all periods presented. In evaluating the appropriateness of aggregating operating segments, the key indicators considered included but were not limited to:(i) similarities of customer base, products, production processes and distribution processes, (ii) similarities of

 

F-71


Table of Contents

governments, (iii) inflation trends, since hyper-inflationary economy has different characteristics that carry out to making decision on how to deal with the cost of the production and distribution, Venezuela has been separated as a separate segment, (iv) currency trends and (v) historical and projected financial and operating statistics, historically and according to our estimates the financial trends of the countries aggregated into an operating segment have been behaved in similar ways and will continue to do so,

Segment disclosure for the Company’s consolidated operations is as follows:

 

2015

   Mexico and
Central
America (1)
    South
America (2)
    Venezuela      Consolidated  

Total revenues

   Ps.  78,709      Ps.  64,752      Ps.  8,899       Ps.  152,360   

Intercompany revenue

     3,791        3        —           3,794   

Gross profit

     40,130        27,532        4,368         72,030   

Income before income taxes and share of the profit or loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method

     10,614        3,220        891         14,725   

Depreciation and amortization

     4,404        2,489        251         7,144   

Non cash items other than depreciation and amortization (3)

     685        130        1,352         2,167   

Equity in earnings of associated companies and joint ventures

     97        58        —          155   

Total assets

     133,941        69,281        7,027         210,249   

Investments in associate companies and joint ventures

     15,779        2,094        —           17,873   

Total liabilities

     80,963        17,528        3,023         101,514   

Capital expenditures, net (4)

     4,672        5,686        1,126         11,484   

2014

   Mexico   and
Central
America (1)
    South
America (2)
    Venezuela      Consolidated  

Total revenues

   Ps.  71,965      Ps.  66,367      Ps.  8,966       Ps.  147,298   

Intercompany revenue

     3,471        4        —           3,475   

Gross profit

     36,453        27,372        4,557         68,382   

Income before income taxes and share of the profit or loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method

     9,171        4,748        1,033         14,952   

Depreciation and amortization

     4,046        2,660        243         6,949   

Non cash items other than depreciation and amortization (3)

     693        (204     204         693   

Equity in earnings of associated companies and joint ventures

     (326     201        —           (125

Total assets

     126,818        78,674        6,874         212,366   

Investments in associate companies and joint ventures

     14,827        2,499        —           17,326   

Total liabilities

     80,280        19,109        2,859         102,248   

Capital expenditures, net (4)

     3,952        6,198        1,163         11,313   

2013

   Mexico   and
Central
America (1)
    South
America (2)
    Venezuela      Consolidated  

Total revenues

   Ps.  70,679      Ps.  53,774      Ps.  31,558       Ps.  156,011   

Intercompany revenue

     3,186        —          —           3,186   

Gross profit

     34,941        22,374        15,620         72,935   

Income before income taxes and share of the profit or loss of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method

     9,089        4,622        3,513         17,224   

Depreciation and amortization

     3,806        2,285        1,041         7,132   

Non-cash items other than depreciation and amortization (3)

     (72     (133     217         12   

Equity in earnings of associated companies and joint ventures

     239        49        1         289   

Total assets

     121,685        72,451        22,529         216,665   

Investments in associate companies and joint ventures

     14,251        2,516        —           16,767   

Total liabilities

     72,077        19,255        8,180         99,512   

Capital expenditures, net (4)

     5,287        4,447        1,969         11,703   

 

F-72


Table of Contents

 

(1) Central America includes Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama. Domestic (Mexico only) revenues were Ps. 67,772, Ps. 62,990 and Ps. 62,364 during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Domestic (Mexico only) total assets were Ps. 123,585, Ps. 117,949 and Ps. 114,254 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Domestic (Mexico only) total liabilities were Ps. 78,834, Ps. 78,358 and Ps. 70,805 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
(2) South America includes Brazil, Argentina, Colombia and Venezuela, although Venezuela is shown separately above. South America revenues include Brazilian revenues of Ps. 37,825, Ps. 43,573 and Ps. 30,265 during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Brazilian total assets were Ps. 49,448, Ps. 59,836 and Ps. 53,441 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Brazilian total liabilities Ps. 10,753, Ps. 12,629 and Ps. 12,484 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. South America revenues also include Colombian revenues of Ps. 12,984, Ps. 13,118 and Ps. 12,780 during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Colombian total assets were Ps. 15,182, Ps. 14,864 and Ps. 15,512 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Colombian total liabilities were Ps. 3,977, Ps. 3,594 and Ps. 3,974 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. South America revenues also include Argentine revenues of Ps. 13,943, Ps, 9,676 and Ps. 10,729 during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Argentine total assets were Ps. 4,651, Ps. 3,974 and Ps. 3,498 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Argentine total liabilities were Ps. 2,798, Ps. 2,886 and Ps. 2,797 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
(3) Includes foreign exchange loss, net; gain on monetary position, net; and market value (gain) loss on financial instruments.
(4) Includes acquisitions and disposals of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and other long-lived assets.
(5) The Asian division consists of the 51% equity investment in CCFPI (Philippines) which was acquired in 2013, and is accounted for using the equity method of accounting (see Note 9). The equity in earnings of the Asian division were Ps. 86, Ps. (334) and Ps. 108 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively and are presented as part of the Company’s corporate operations in 2015, 2014 and 2013 and thus disclosed net in the table above as part of the “equity in earnings of associated companies” in the Mexico & Central America division, as is the equity method investment in CCFPI Ps. 9,996, Ps. 9,021 and 9,398. However, the Asian division represents a separate reporting segment under IFRS 8 and is represented by the following investee level amounts, prior to reflection of the Company’s 51% equity interest in the accompanying consolidated financial statements: revenues Ps. 19,576, Ps. 16,548 and Ps. 13,438, gross profit Ps. 5,325, Ps. 4,913 and Ps. 4,285, income before income taxes Ps. 334, Ps. 664 and Ps. 310, depreciation and amortization Ps. 2,369, Ps. 643 and Ps. 1,229, total assets Ps. 22,002, Ps. 19,877 and Ps. 17,232, total liabilities Ps. 6,493, Ps. 6,614 and Ps. 4,488, capital expenditures Ps. 1,778, Ps. 2,215 and Ps. 1,889.

Note 26. Future Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Standards not yet in Effect:

The Company has not applied the following the standards and interpretations that are issued, but not yet effective, up to the date of issuance of the Company’s financial statements are disclosed below. The Company intends to adopt these standards, if applicable, when they become effective.

IFRS 16, Leases

In January 2016, the IASB issued the final version of the IFRS 16 Leases which replaces the current IAS 17 Leases. Under the new standard, a lease is a contract, or part of a contract, that conveys the right to use an asset (the underlying asset) for a period of time in exchange for consideration. To be a lease, a contract must convey the right to control the use of an identified asset, which could be a physically distinct portion of an asset such as a floor of a building. A contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset if, throughout the period of use, the customer has the right to: (1) obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the identified asset; and (2) direct the use of the identified asset (i.e., direct how and for what purpose the asset is used). The new standard will be effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. The Company has yet to complete its evaluation of whether these changes will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

IFRS 9, Financial Instruments

In July 2014, the IASB issued the final version of IFRS 9 Financial Instruments which reflects all phases of the financial instruments project and replaces IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement and all previous versions of IFRS 9. The standard introduces new requirements for classification and measurement, impairment, and hedge accounting. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, with early application permitted. Except for hedge accounting, retrospective application is required but providing comparative information is not compulsory. For hedge accounting, the requirements are generally applied prospectively, with some limited exceptions. The adoption of IFRS 9 will have an effect on the classification and measurement of the Company´s financial assets, but no impact on the classification and measurement of the Company’s financial liabilities. The Company has not early adopted this IFRS.

IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers

IFRS 15, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, was issued in May 2014 and applies to annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018, earlier application is permitted. If the Entity elects apply IFRS 15 retrospectively, the entity shall recognise the

 

F-73


Table of Contents

cumulative effect of initially applying this Standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings (or other component of equity, as appropriate) of the annual reporting period that includes the date of initial application. Revenue is recognized as control is passed, either over time or at a point in time.

The standard outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. In applying the revenue model to contracts within its scope, an entity will: 1) Identify the contract(s) with a customer ; 2) Identify the performance obligations in the contract; 3) Determine the transaction price; 4) Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; 5) Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. Also, an entity needs to disclose sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The Company has yet to complete its evaluation of whether these changes will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Amendments to IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements: Accounting for Acquisitions of Interests

The amendments to IFRS 11 require that a joint operator accounting for the acquisition of an interest in a joint operation, in which the activity of the joint operation constitutes a business, must apply the relevant IFRS 3 principles for business combinations accounting. The amendments also clarify that a previously held interest in a joint operation is not remeasured on the acquisition of an additional interest in the same joint operation while joint control is retained. In addition, scope exclusion has been added to IFRS 11 to specify that the amendments do not apply when the parties sharing joint control, including the reporting entity, are under common control of the same ultimate controlling party.

The amendments apply to both the acquisition of the initial interest in a joint operation and the acquisition of any additional interests in the same joint operation and are prospectively effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016, with early adoption permitted. These amendments are not expected to have any impact on the Company.

Amendments to IAS 16 and IAS 38: Clarification of Acceptable Methods of Depreciation and Amortization

The amendments clarify the principle in IAS 16 and IAS 38 that revenue reflects a pattern of economic benefits that are generated from operating a business (of which the asset is part) rather than the economic benefits that are consumed through use of the asset. As a result, a revenue-based method cannot be used to depreciate property, plant and equipment and may only be used in very limited circumstances to amortise intangible assets. The amendments are effective prospectively for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016. These amendments are not expected to have any impact to the Company given that the Company has not used a revenue-based method to depreciate its non-current assets.

Amendments to IFRS 10 and IAS 28: Sale or Contribution of Assets between an Investor and its Associate or Joint Venture

The amendments address the conflict between IFRS 10 and IAS 28 in dealing with the loss of control of a subsidiary that is sold or contributed to an associate or joint venture. The amendments clarify that the gain or loss resulting from the sale or contribution of assets that constitute a business, as defined in IFRS 3, between an investor and its associate or joint venture, is recognised in full. Any gain or loss resulting from the sale or contribution of assets that do not constitute a business, however, is recognised only to the extent of unrelated investors’ interests in the associate or joint venture. These amendments must be applied prospectively and are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016. These amendments are not expected to have any significant impact on the Company.

Annual Improvements 2012-2014 Cycle

These improvements are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016. They include:

IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

Assets (or disposal groups) are generally disposed of either through sale or distribution to owners. The amendment clarifies that changing from one of these disposal methods to the other would not be considered a new plan of disposal, rather it is a continuation of the original plan. There is, therefore, no interruption of the application of the requirements in IFRS 5. This amendment must be applied prospectively.

IAS 19 Employee Benefits

The amendment clarifies that market depth of high quality corporate bonds is assessed based on the currency in which the obligation is denominated, rather than the country where the obligation is located. When there is no deep market for high quality corporate bonds in that currency, government bond rates must be used. This amendment must be applied prospectively.

 

F-74


Table of Contents

Note 27. Supplemental Guarantor Information

Consolidating Condensed Financial Information

The following consolidating information presents consolidating condensed statements of financial position as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and condensed consolidating statements of income, other comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 of the Company and Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V., Comercializadora la Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador CIMSA, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Servicios Integrados Inmuebles del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Yoli de Acapulco, S. de R. L. de C.V. (the Guarantors).

These statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the IASB, with the exception that the subsidiaries are accounted for as investments under the equity method rather than being consolidated. The guarantees of the Guarantors are full and unconditional.

The Company’s consolidating condensed financial information for the (i) Company; (ii) its 100% owned guarantors subsidiaries (on standalone basis), which are wholly and unconditional guarantors under both prior years debt and current year debt referred to as “Senior Notes” in Note 17; (iii) the combined non-guarantor subsidiaries; iv) eliminations and v) the Company’s consolidated financial statements are as follows:

 

     Parent      Wholly-owned
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
     Combined
non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
     Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 
    

Consolidated   Statement   of   Financial   Position

As of December 31, 2015

              

Assets:

             

Current assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

   Ps. 10,991       Ps. 810       Ps. 4,188       Ps. —        Ps. 15,989   

Accounts receivable, net

     18,378         7,200         47,192         (63,123     9,647   

Inventories

     —           3,665         4,401         —          8,066   

Recoverable taxes

     18         648         3,554         —          4,220   

Other current assets and financial assets

     519         1,636         2,155         —          4,310   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     29,906         13,959         61,490         (63,123     42,232   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current assets:

             

Investments in associates and joint ventures

     113,513         71,697         12,121         (179,458     17,873   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     —           17,308         33,224         —          50,532   

Intangible assets, net

     29,348         35,287         26,119         —          90,754   

Other non-current assets and financial assets

     3,409         7,763         4,108         (6,422     8,858   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

     146,270         132,055         75,572         (185,880     168,017   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   Ps. 176,176       Ps. 146,014       Ps. 137,062       Ps. (249,003   Ps. 210,249   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities:

             

Current liabilities:

             

Short-term bank loans and notes payable and current portion of non-current debt

   Ps. 2,894       Ps. —         Ps. 987       Ps. —        Ps. 3,881   

Suppliers

     19         5,605         9,846         —          15,470   

Other current liabilities

     7,155         47,870         19,227         (63,123     11,129   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     10,068         53,475         30,060         (63,123     30,480   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities:

             

Bank loans and notes payable

     61,321         —           1,939         —          63,260   

Other non-current liabilities

     38         750         13,408         (6,422     7,774   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

     61,359         750         15,347         (6,422     71,034   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     71,427         54,225         45,407         (69,545     101,514   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity:

             

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

     104,749         91,789         87,669         (179,458     104,749   

Non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries

     —           —           3,986         —          3,986   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity

     104,749         91,789         91,655         (179,458     108,735   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

   Ps. 176,176       Ps. 146,014       Ps. 137,062       Ps. (249,003   Ps. 210,249   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-75


Table of Contents
     Parent      Wholly-owned
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
     Combined
non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
     Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 
    

Consolidated   Statement   of   Financial   Position

As of December 31, 2014

              

Assets:

             

Current assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

   Ps. 7,282       Ps. 755       Ps. 4,921       Ps. —        Ps. 12,958   

Accounts receivable, net

     42,614         4,733         43,794         (80,802     10,339   

Inventories

     —           3,509         4,310         —          7,819   

Recoverable taxes

     72         1,675         2,335         —          4,082   

Other current assets and financial assets

     36         1,015         1,879         —          2,930   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     50,004         11,687         57,239         (80,802     38,128   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current assets:

             

Investments in associates and joint ventures

     94,347         57,839         13,676         (148,536     17,326   

Property, plant and equipment, net

     —           17,049         33,478         —          50,527   

Intangible assets, net

     29,348         34,920         32,756         —          97,024   

Other non-current assets and financial assets

     1,281         7,672         6,931         (6,523     9,361   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current assets

     124,976         117,480         86,841         (155,059     174,238   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   Ps. 174,980       Ps. 129,167       Ps. 144,080       Ps. (235,861   Ps. 212,366   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities:

             

Current liabilities:

             

Short-term bank loans and notes payable and current portion of non-current debt

   Ps. 352       Ps. —         Ps. 1,225       Ps. —        Ps. 1,577   

Suppliers

     15         2,832         11,304         —          14,151   

Other current liabilities

     5,890         63,412         24,175         (80,802     12,675   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     6,257         66,244         36,704         (80,802     28,403   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current liabilities:

             

Bank loans and notes payable

     62,968         —           1,853         —          64,821   

Other non-current liabilities

     38         1,382         14,127         (6,523     9,024   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current liabilities

     63,006         1,382         15,980         (6,523     73,845   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     69,263         67,626         52,684         (87,325     102,248   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Equity:

             

Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent

     105,717         61,541         86,995         (148,536     105,717   

Non-controlling interest in consolidated subsidiaries

     —           —           4,401         —          4,401   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity

     105,717         61,541         91,396         (148,536     110,118   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

   Ps. 174,980       Ps. 129,167       Ps. 144,080       Ps. (235,861   Ps. 212,366   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-76


Table of Contents
     Parent     Wholly-owned
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
    Combined
non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 
     Condensed consolidating income statements:
For the year ended December 31, 2015
             

Total revenues

   Ps. 1      Ps. 66,740      Ps. 97,855      Ps. (12,236   Ps. 152,360   

Cost of goods sold

     —          32,008        50,629        (2,307     80,330   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     1        34,732        47,226        (9,929     72,030   

Administrative expenses

     96        4,711        6,124        (4,526     6,405   

Selling expenses

     —          19,853        27,429        (5,403     41,879   

Other (income) expenses, net

     (12     336        1,424        —          1,748   

Interest expense, net

     1,198        2,916        1,809        —          5,923   

Foreign exchange loss (gain), net

     2,597        305        (1,443     —          1,459   

Other financing (income) expense, net

     (105     (49     45        —          (109

Income taxes

     (984     2,035        3,500        —          4,551   

Share of the profit of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes

     13,024        3,977        150        (16,996     155   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 10,235      Ps. 8,602      Ps. 8,488      Ps. (16,996   Ps. 10,329   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Attributable to:

          

Equity holders of the parent

   Ps. 10,235      Ps. 8,602      Ps. 8,394      Ps. (16,996   Ps. 10,235   

Non-controlling interest

     —          —          94        —          94   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 10,235      Ps. 8,602      Ps. 8,488      Ps. (16,996   Ps. 10,329   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-77


Table of Contents
     Parent     Wholly-owned
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
    Combined
non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 
     Condensed consolidating income statements:
For the year ended December 31, 2014
             

Total revenues

   Ps. 1      Ps. 61,431      Ps. 103,506      Ps. (17,640   Ps. 147,298   

Cost of goods sold

     —          29,790        52,170        (3,044     78,916   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     1        31,641        51,336        (14,596     68,382   

Administrative expenses

     178        4,255        6,374        (4,422     6,385   

Selling expenses

     —          20,617        30,022        (10,174     40,465   

Other (income) expenses, net

     18        (52     192        —          158   

Interest expense, net

     748        3,021        1,398        —          5,167   

Foreign exchange loss (gain), net

     1,718        (21     (729     —          968   

Other financing (income) expense, net

     (27     (3     317        —          287   

Income taxes

     (605     1,069        3,397        —          3,861   

Share of the profit of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes

     12,571        6,209        (78     (18,827     (125
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 10,542      Ps. 8,964      Ps. 10,287      Ps. (18,827   Ps. 10,966   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Attributable to:

          

Equity holders of the parent

   Ps. 10,542      Ps. 8,964      Ps. 9,863      Ps. (18,827   Ps. 10,542   

Non-controlling interest

     —          —          424        —          424   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 10,542      Ps. 8,964      Ps. 10,287      Ps. (18,827   Ps. 10,966   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     Parent     Wholly-owned
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
    Combined
non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 
    

Condensed consolidating income statements:

For the year ended December 31, 2013

             

Total revenues

   Ps. —        Ps. 62,750      Ps. 109,054      Ps. (15,793   Ps. 156,011   

Cost of goods sold

     —          30,398        53,779        (1,101     83,076   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

     —          32,352        55,275        (14,692     72,935   

Administrative expenses

     111        8,459        6,504        (8,587     6,487   

Selling expenses

     —          16,293        34,640        (6,105     44,828   

Other (income) expenses, net

     (3     107        519        —          623   

Interest expense (income), net

     353        2,744        (410     —          2,687   

Foreign exchange loss, net

     160        98        481        —          739   

Other financing (income) expense, net

     (82     26        403        —          347   

Income taxes

     75        1,896        3,760        —          5,731   

Share of the profit of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes

     12,157        5,528        216        (17,612     289   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 11,543      Ps. 8,257      Ps. 9,594      Ps. (17,612   Ps. 11,782   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Attributable to:

          

Equity holders of the parent

   Ps. 11,543      Ps. 8,257      Ps. 9,355      Ps. (17,612   Ps. 11,543   

Non-controlling interest

     —          —          239        —          239   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 11,543      Ps. 8,257      Ps. 9,594      Ps. (17,612   Ps. 11,782   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-78


Table of Contents
    

Condensed   consolidating   statements   of
comprehensive income

For   the   year   ended   December   31,   2015

             

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 10,235      Ps. 8,602      Ps. 8,488      Ps. (16,996   Ps. 10,329   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

          

Other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

          

Unrealized gain on available-for sale securities, net of taxes

     —          —          —          —          —     

Valuation of the effective portion of derivative financial instruments, net of taxes

     (77     304        4        (258     (27

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

     (4,853     4,585        (5,536     397        (5,407
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

     (4,930     4,889        (5,532     139        (5,434
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Items not to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

          

Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability, net of taxes

     132        21        117        (132     138   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income not being reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

     132        21        117        (132     138   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

     (4,798     4,910        (5,415     7        (5,296
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

   Ps. 5,437     Ps. 13,512      Ps. 3,073      Ps. (16,989   Ps. 5,033   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Attributable to:

          

Equity holders of the parent

   Ps. 5,437      Ps. 13,512      Ps. 3,477      Ps. (16,989   Ps. 5,437   

Non-controlling interest

     —          —          (404     —          (404
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

   Ps. 5,437      Ps. 13,512      Ps. 3,073      Ps. (16,989   Ps. 5,033   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
    

Condensed   consolidating   statements   of
comprehensive income

For   the   year   ended   December   31,   2014

             

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 10,542      Ps. 8,964      Ps. 10,287      Ps. (18,827   Ps. 10,966   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

          

Other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

          

Unrealized gain on available-for sale securities, net of taxes

     —          —          —          —          —     

Valuation of the effective portion of derivative financial instruments, net of taxes

     214        85        47        (131     215   

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

     (11,992     (9,922     (2,072     11,992        (11,994
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

     (11,778     (9,837     (2,025     11,861        (11,779
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Items not to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

          

Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability, net of taxes

     (192     (101     (108     209        (192
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income not being reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

     (192     (101     (108     209        (192
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

     (11,970     (9,938     (2,133     12,070        (11,971
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

   Ps. (1,428   Ps. (974   Ps. 8,154      Ps. (6,757   Ps. (1,005
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Attributable to:

          

Equity holders of the parent

   Ps. (1,428   Ps. (974   Ps. 7,777      Ps. (6,757   Ps. (1,382

Non-controlling interest

     —          —          377        —          377   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

   Ps. (1,428   Ps. (974   Ps. 8,154      Ps. (6,757   Ps. (1,005
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-79


Table of Contents
     Parent     Wholly-owned
guarantors
Subsidiaries
    Combined
Non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 
    

Condensed   consolidating   statements   of
comprehensive   income

For the year ended December 31, 2013

             

Consolidated net income

   Ps. 11,543      Ps. 8,257      Ps. 9,594      Ps. (17,612   Ps. 11,782   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income:

          

Other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

          

Unrealized gain on available-for sale securities, net of taxes

     —         —         (2     —         (2

Valuation of the effective portion of derivative financial instruments, net of taxes

     (279     (220     (256     476        (279

Exchange differences on translation of foreign operations

     (1,618     (1,455     (110     1,618        (1,565
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

     (1,897     (1,675     (368     2,094        (1,846
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Items not to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

          

Remeasurements of the net defined benefit liability, net of taxes

     (145     (131     (146     277        (145
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income not being reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:

     (145     (131     (146     277        (145
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

     (2,042     (1,806     (514     2,371        (1,991
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

   Ps. 9,501      Ps. 6,451      Ps. 9,080      Ps. (15,241   Ps. 9,791   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Attributable to:

          

Equity holders of the parent

   Ps. 9,501      Ps. 6,451      Ps. 8,680      Ps. (15,241   Ps. 9,391   

Non-controlling interest

     —         —         400        —         400   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Consolidated comprehensive income for the year, net of tax

   Ps. 9,501      Ps. 6,451      Ps. 9,080      Ps. (15,241   Ps. 9,791   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-80


Table of Contents
     Parent     Wholly-owned
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
    Combined
non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 
    

Condensed Consolidated Statements of

Cash   Flows   For   the   year   ended   December   31, 2015

             

Cash flows from operating activities:

          

Income before income taxes

   Ps. 9,251      Ps. 10,637      Ps. 11,988      Ps. (16,996   Ps. 14,880   

Non-cash items

     (11,920     2,308        9,115        16,996        16,499   

Changes in working capital

     17        1,362        (9,556     —          (8,177
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows (used in)/from operating activities

     (2,652     14,307        11,547        —          23,202   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Investing activities:

          

Interest received

     2,055        238        2,347        (4,226     414   

Acquisition of long-lived assets, net

     —          (2,911     (7,401     —          (10,312

Acquisition of intangible assets and other investing activities

     65        (62     (1,031     —          (1,028

Investments in shares

     (10,929     (9,352     (5,681     25,930        (32

Dividends received

     —          17        13        (17     13   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows (used in)/from investing activities

     (8,809     (12,070     (11,753     21,687        (10,945
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financing activities:

          

Proceeds from borrowings

     —          —          1,907        —          1,907   

Repayment of borrowings

     (7,681     —          (1,250     —          (8,931

Interest paid

     (609     (3,491     (3,694     4,226        (3,568

Dividends paid

     (6,405     —          (28     17        (6,416

Other financing activities

     28,770        1,300        4,301        (25,930     8,441   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows (used in)/from financing activities

     14,075        (2,191     1,236        (21,687     (8,567
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

     2,614        46        1,030        —          3,690   

Initial balance of cash and cash equivalents

     7,282        755        4,921        —          12,958   

Effects of exchange rate changes and inflation effects on the balance sheet of cash held in foreign currencies

     1,095        9        (1,763     —          (659
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance of cash and cash equivalents

   Ps. 10,991      Ps. 810      Ps. 4,188      Ps. —        Ps. 15,989   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     Parent     Wholly-owned
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
    Combined
non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 
    

Condensed Consolidated Statements of

Cash   Flows   For   the   year   ended   December   31, 2014

             

Cash flows from operating activities:

          

Income before income taxes

   Ps. 9,937      Ps. 10,033      Ps. 13,684      Ps. (18,827   Ps. 14,827   

Non-cash items

     (12,814     (751     6,016        21,819        14,270   

Changes in working capital

     232        2,952        (7,875     —          (4,691
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows (used in)/from operating activities

     (2,645     12,234        11,825        2,992        24,406   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-81


Table of Contents
     Parent     Wholly-owned
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
    Combined
non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 
    

Condensed Consolidated Statements of

Cash   Flows   For   the   year   ended   December   31, 2014

             

Investing activities:

          

Interest received

     2,499        463        1,743        (4,326     379   

Acquisition of long-lived assets, net

     —          (2,499     (8,216     —          (10,715

Acquisition of intangible assets and other investing activities

     5,951        (1,951     (19,715     14,824        (891

Investments in shares

     (3     (315     260        —          (58

Dividends received

     59        451        142        (504     148   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows (used in)/from investing activities

     8,506        (3,851     (25,786     9,994        (11,137
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financing activities:

          

Proceeds from borrowings

     61,752        —          (55,572     —          6,180   

Repayment of borrowings

     (61,130     —          54,876        —          (6,254

Interest paid

     (237     (3,668     (3,603     4,326        (3,182

Dividends paid

     (6,011     —          (523     504        (6,030

Other financing activities

     834        (5,179     1,299        982        (2,064
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows (used in)/from financing activities

     (4,792     (8,847     (3,523     5,812        (11,350
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

     1,069        (464     (17,484     18,798        1,919   

Initial balance of cash and cash equivalents

     5,485        1,220        8,601        —          15,306   

Effects of exchange rate changes and inflation effects on the balance sheet of cash held in foreign currencies

     728        (1     (4,994     —          (4,267
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance of cash and cash equivalents

   Ps. 7,282      Ps. 755      Ps. (13,877   Ps. 18,798      Ps. 12,958   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-82


Table of Contents
     Parent     Wholly-owned
Guarantors
Subsidiaries
    Combined
non-guarantor
Subsidiaries
    Eliminations     Consolidated
Total
 
     Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash   Flows   For   the   year   ended   December   31,   2013
             

Cash flows from operating activities:

          

Income before income taxes

   Ps. 11,618      Ps. 10,153      Ps. 13,354      Ps. (17,612   Ps. 17,513   

Non-cash items

     (13,719     (1,420     5,699        20,604        11,164   

Changes in working capital

     (358     2,211        (8,433     —          (6,580
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows from operating activities

     (2,459     10,944        10,620        2,992        22,097   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Investing activities:

          

Acquisitions

     (1,078     46        (36,621     —          (37,653

Interest received

     3,524        1,940        (827     (3,983     654   

Acquisition of long-lived assets, net

     —          (3,302     (7,118     —          (10,420

Acquisition of intangible assets and other investing activities

     (53,740     (214     60,168        (8,205     (1,991

Investments in shares

     684        (12,581     11,826        —          (71

Dividends received

     23,372        1,115        —          (24,487     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows (used in)/from investing activities

     (27,238     (12,996     27,428        (36,675     (49,481
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financing activities:

          

Proceeds from borrowings

     61,752        —          4,996        —          66,748   

Repayment of borrowings

     (32,567     —          (4,177     —          (36,744

Interest paid

     (1,538     (3,358     (1,414     3,982        (2,328

Dividends paid

     (5,950     (20,986     (3,553     24,487        (6,002

Acquisition of non-controlling interests

     —          —          515        —          515   

Other financing activities

     (268     26,672        (30,301     5,214        1,317   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash flows from / (used in) financing activities

     21,429        2,328        (33,934     33,683        23,506   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (8,268     276        4,114        —          (3,878

Initial balance of cash and cash equivalents

     14,394        981        7,847        —          23,222   

Effects of exchange rate changes and inflation effects on the balance sheet of cash held in foreign currencies

     (641     (37     (3,360     —          (4,038
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance of cash and cash equivalents

   Ps. 5,485      Ps. 1,220      Ps. 8,601      Ps. —        Ps. 15,306   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Note 28. Subsequent Events

In February 17, 2016, the president of Venezuela announced a devaluation of the official exchange rate of 37% and moved the existing three-tier exchange rates system into dual system as part of a package of economic policies aimed to face the economic crisis from the OPEC member-countries. The official exchange rate (6.30 bolivars per USD as of December 31, 2015) and the SICAD exchange rate (13.50 bolivars per USD as of December 31, 2015), were merged into a new official exchange rate at 10 bolivars per USD. The SIMADI exchange rate was maintained in the same conditions.

On March 7, 2016, the Company´s Board of Directors approved the payment of a cash dividend in the amount of Ps. 6,944 or the equivalent of Ps. 3.35 per share, to be paid in two equal installments as of May 3 2016 and November 1, 2016.

On March 10, 2016, the Venezuelan government announced that it was replacing the SIMADI exchange rate with a new market based exchange rate known as Divisas Complementarias, or DICOM, and the official exchange rate with a preferential exchange rate denominated Divisa Protegida, or DIPRO. The DIPRO exchange rate is determined by the Venezuelan government and may be used to settle imports of a list of goods and raw materials, (which as of the date of this financial statement has not been published). The DICOM exchange rate is determined based on supply and demand of U.S. dollars. As of April 8, 2016 the DIPRO and DICOM exchange rates were 10 bolivars and 306.07 bolivars per US dollar, respectively. The Company will closely monitor developments in this area, which may affect the exchange rate(s) used prospectively.

On April 11, 2016, the Company paid domestic bonds denominated on million pesos for a total amount of Ps. 2,500 (nominal amount).

 

F-83

Exhibit 2.9

Execution version

Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.,

as Issuer

and

Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V.,

Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V.,

Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V.,

Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V.,

Yoli de Acapulco, S. de R.L. de C.V., and

Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V.

as Guarantors

and

Distribuidora y Manufacturera del Valle de México, S. de R.L. de C.V.,

as Successor Guarantor

and

The Bank of New York Mellon,

as Trustee, Security Registrar, Paying Agent and Transfer Agent

 

 

S EVENTH S UPPLEMENTAL I NDENTURE

Dated as of November 23, 2015

 

 

U.S. $1,000,000,000

2.375% Senior Notes due 2018

U.S. $500,000,000

4.625% Senior Notes due 2020

U.S. $900,000,000

3.875% Senior Notes due 2023

U.S. $600,000,000

5.250% Senior Notes due 2043

 

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

ARTICLE 1: RATIFICATION; DEFINITIONS

     2   

Section 101. Seventh Supplemental Indenture

     2   

Section 102. Definitions

     2   

ARTICLE 2: ASSUMPTION OF OBLIGATIONS, RIGHTS AND DUTIES BY THE SUCCESSOR GUARANTOR

     2   

Section 201. Assumption of Obligations

     2   

Section 202. Assumption of Rights and Duties

     2   

ARTICLE 3: MISCELLANEOUS

     2   

Section 301. Consent to Service; Jurisdiction

     2   

Section 302. Governing Law; Waiver of Jury Trial

     3   

Section 303. Separability of Invalid Provisions

     3   

Section 304. Execution in Counterparts

     3   

Section 305. Certain Matters

     3   


SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, dated as of November 23, 2015 (this “ Seventh Supplemental Indenture ”), among Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable organized and existing under the laws of the United Mexican States (“ Mexico ”) (the “ Company ”), having its principal office at Calle Mario Pani No. 100, Colonia Santa Fe Cuajimalpa, Delegación Cuajimalpa de Morelos, 05348 México, D.F., México, Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V., Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Yoli de Acapulco, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., companies organized and existing under the laws of Mexico, as guarantors (each a “ Guarantor ” and collectively, the “ Guarantors ”), Distribuidora y Manufacturera del Valle de México, S. de R.L. de C.V., a sociedad de responsabilidad limitada de capital variable organized and existing under the laws of Mexico, as the successor guarantor (the “ Successor Guarantor ”) and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, security registrar, paying agent and transfer agent (the “ Trustee ”), to the indenture, dated as of February 5, 2010, between the Company and the Trustee (the “ Base Indenture ”), as amended and supplemented by the first supplemental indenture, dated as of February 5, 2010, the second supplemental indenture, dated as of April 1, 2011, the third supplemental indenture, dated as of September 6, 2013 (the “ Third Supplemental Indenture ”), the fourth supplemental indenture, dated as of October 18, 2013, the fifth supplemental indenture, dated as of November 26, 2013 (the “ Fifth Supplemental Indenture ”) and the sixth supplemental indenture, dated as of January 21, 2014 (the “ Sixth Supplemental Indenture ”). As used herein, “Indenture” means the Base Indenture, as amended and supplemented as of the date hereof.

W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 2 of the Third Supplemental Indenture, Article 3 of the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, and Article 3 of the Sixth Supplemental Indenture, Servicios Integrados Inmuebles del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V. (the “ Merged Guarantor ”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, agreed to guarantee all the Company’s obligations under the Indenture, including the due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium (if any), and interest on the (1) U.S.$500,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 4.625% Senior Notes due 2020, (2) U.S.$1,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 2.375% Senior Notes due 2018, (3) U.S.$900,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 3.875% Senior Notes due 2023, and (4) U.S.$600,000,000 aggregate principal amount of the Company’s 5.250% Senior Notes due 2043 (collectively, the “ Notes ”).

WHEREAS, on October 1, 2015, the Successor Guarantor entered into a merger agreement with the Merged Guarantor, whereby the Merged Guarantor agreed to merge with and into the Successor Guarantor (the “ Merger ”).

WHEREAS, pursuant to the Merger, the Successor Guarantor will be the surviving entity.

WHEREAS, as a result of the Merger and as required pursuant to Article 3 of the Third Supplemental Indenture and Article 4 of the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, the Successor Guarantor intends to assume all obligations of the Merged Guarantor under the guarantees provided pursuant to Article 2 of the Third Supplemental Indenture, Article 3 of the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, and Article 3 of the Sixth Supplemental Indenture (the “ Guarantees ”).

WHEREAS, at the time of and immediately after giving effect to the Merger, no Event of Default, or an event or condition which, after the giving of notice or lapse of time, or both, would become an Event of Default, with respect to the Notes, has occurred or is continuing.

 

1


WHEREAS, all things necessary for the execution of this Seventh Supplemental Indenture and to make this Seventh Supplemental Indenture a valid and binding agreement of the Company, each of the Guarantors and the Successor Guarantor, in accordance with its terms, have been done.

NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto agree, for the equal and proportionate benefit of the Trustee and all Holders of the Notes, as follows:

ARTICLE 1

R ATIFICATION ; D EFINITIONS

SECTION 101.  Seventh Supplemental Indenture .   This Seventh Supplemental Indenture is supplemental to, and is entered into in accordance with, Section 901(11) of the Base Indenture, and except as modified, amended and supplemented by this Seventh Supplemental Indenture, the provisions of the Indenture are in all respects ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect.

SECTION 102.  Definitions .   All terms used in this Seventh Supplemental Indenture that are defined in the Indenture have the meanings assigned to them in the Indenture, except as otherwise provided by this Seventh Supplemental Indenture.

ARTICLE 2

A SSUMPTION OF OBLIGATIONS , RIGHTS AND DUTIES BY THE SUCCESSOR GUARANTOR

SECTION 201.  Assumption of Obligations . As a result of the Merger and as required pursuant to Article 3 of the Third Supplemental Indenture and Article 4 of the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, the Successor Guarantor hereby expressly assumes all obligations of the Merged Guarantor under the Guarantees, and therefore agrees to guarantee all the Company’s obligations under the Indenture, including the due and punctual payment of the principal of, premium (if any), and interest on, the Notes.

SECTION 202.  Assumption of Rights and Duties .  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Third Supplemental Indenture and Section 402 of the Fifth Supplemental Indenture, the Successor Guarantor hereby succeeds to, and is substituted for, and may exercise every right and power of, the Merged Guarantor, with the same effect as if it had been named as a guarantor in the Indenture.

ARTICLE 3

M ISCELLANEOUS

S ECTION  301.  Consent to Service; Jurisdiction .   Each party hereto agrees that any legal suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to the Indenture, any series of Notes, or the Guarantees may be instituted in any federal or state court in the Borough of Manhattan, in The City of New York, New York and in the courts of its own corporate domicile, in respect of actions brought against each such party as a defendant, and each waives any objection which it may now or hereafter have to the laying of the venue of any such legal suit, action or proceeding, waives any immunity from jurisdiction or to service of process in respect of any such suit, action or proceeding, waives any right to any jurisdiction to which it may be entitled on account of place of residence, domicile or any other reason and irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of any such court in any such suit, action or proceeding. The Successor Guarantor hereby designates and appoints CT Corporation System, 111 Eighth Avenue, 13 th Floor, New York, New York 10011, as its authorized agent upon which process may be served in any legal suit, action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Seventh

 

2


Supplemental Indenture, the Indenture, any series of Notes, or the Guarantees which may be instituted in any federal or state court in the Borough of Manhattan, The City of New York, New York, and agrees that service of process upon such agent shall be deemed in every respect effective service of process upon the Successor Guarantor in any such suit, action or proceeding and further designates its domicile, the domicile of CT Corporation System specified above and any domicile CT Corporation System may have in the future as its domicile to receive any notice hereunder (including service of process). If for any reason CT Corporation System (or any successor agent for this purpose) shall cease to act as agent for service of process as provided above, the Successor Guarantor will promptly appoint a successor agent for this purpose reasonably acceptable to the Trustee and notify the Trustee in writing of any such change. The Successor Guarantor agrees to take any and all actions as may be necessary to maintain such designation and appointment of such agent in full force and effect.

S ECTION  302.  Governing Law; Waiver of Jury Trial .

(a) THIS SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

(b) EACH PARTY HERETO HEREBY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ALL RIGHTS TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, PROCEEDING OR COUNTERCLAIM (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS SEVENTH SUPPLEMENTAL INDENTURE, THE INDENTURE, ANY SERIES OF NOTES, THE GUARANTEES OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY OR THEREBY.

S ECTION  303.  Separability of Invalid Provisions .   In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Seventh Supplemental Indenture, the Indenture, any series of Notes or the Guarantees should be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions contained herein or therein, and to the extent and only to the extent that any such provision is invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this Seventh Supplemental Indenture, the Indenture, any series of Notes and the Guarantees shall be construed as if such provision had never been contained herein.

S ECTION  304.  Execution in Counterparts .   This Seventh Supplemental Indenture may be simultaneously executed and delivered in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument.

S ECTION  305.  Certain Matters .   The Trustee shall not be responsible in any manner whatsoever for or in respect of the validity or sufficiency of this Seventh Supplemental Indenture, the Indenture, the Notes, the Guarantees or for or in respect of the recitals contained herein, all of which are made solely by the Company and the Guarantors, including the Successor Guarantor.

 

3


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Seventh Supplemental Indenture to be duly executed on their respective behalves, all as of the day and year first written above.

 

COCA-COLA FEMSA, S.A.B. DE C.V.
as Issuer
By:  

/s/ Gerardo Cruz Celaya

    By:  

/s/ Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz

Name:   Gerardo Cruz Celaya     Name:  

Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz

Title:   Attorney-in-fact     Title:   Attorney-in-fact
PROPIMEX, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
as Guarantor
By:  

/s/ Gerardo Cruz Celaya

    By:  

/s/ Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz

Name:   Gerardo Cruz Celaya     Name:   Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz
Title:   Attorney-in-fact     Title:   Attorney-in-fact
COMERCIALIZADORA LA PUREZA DE BEBIDAS,
S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
as Guarantor
By:  

/s/ Gerardo Cruz Celaya

    By:  

/s/ Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz

Name:   Gerardo Cruz Celaya     Name:   Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz
Title:   Attorney-in-fact     Title:   Attorney-in-fact
GRUPO EMBOTELLADOR CIMSA, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
as Guarantor
By:  

/s/ Gerardo Cruz Celaya

    By:  

/s/ Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz

Name:   Gerardo Cruz Celaya     Name:   Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz
Title:   Attorney-in-fact     Title:   Attorney-in-fact
REFRESCOS VICTORIA DEL CENTRO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
as Guarantor
By:  

/s/ Gerardo Cruz Celaya

    By:  

/s/ Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz

Name:   Gerardo Cruz Celaya     Name:   Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz
Title:   Attorney-in-fact     Title:   Attorney-in-fact

Signature Page

Seventh Supplemental Indenture


YOLI DE ACAPULCO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
as Guarantor
By:  

/s/ Gerardo Cruz Celaya

    By:  

/s/ Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz

Name:   Gerardo Cruz Celaya     Name:   Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz
Title:   Attorney-in-fact     Title:   Attorney-in-fact
CONTROLADORA INTERAMERICANA DE BEBIDAS,
S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
as Guarantor
By:  

/s/ Gerardo Cruz Celaya

    By:  

/s/ Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz

Name:   Gerardo Cruz Celaya     Name:   Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz
Title:   Attorney-in-fact     Title:   Attorney-in-fact
DISTRIBUIDORA Y MANUFACTURERA DEL VALLE DE
MÉXICO, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
as Successor Guarantor
By:  

/s/ Gerardo Cruz Celaya

    By:  

/s/ Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz

Name:   Gerardo Cruz Celaya     Name:   Carlos Luis Díaz Sáenz
Title:   Attorney-in-fact     Title:   Attorney-in-fact

Signature Page

Seventh Supplemental Indenture


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON

as Trustee, Security Registrar, Paying Agent and Transfer Agent

By:  

/s/ Elizabeth Stern

  Name: Elizabeth Stern
  Title: Vice President

Signature Page

Seventh Supplemental Indenture

Exhibit 7.2

Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and Subsidiaries

Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

Amounts in Millions of Mexican Pesos, Except Ratios

 

     2015      2014     2013  

Earnings available for fixed charges:

       

Income before income taxes and share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted

     Ps. 14,725         Ps. 14,952        Ps. 17,224   

Share of the profit of associates and joint ventures accounted for using the equity method, net of taxes

     155         (125     289   

Plus :

       

Interest Expenses

     6,630         5,948        3,656   

Amortization of capitalized interest

     10         14        6   

Less :

       

Capitalized interest

     60         117        56   

Non-controlling interest

     94         424        239   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 
     21,366         20,248        20,880   

Fixed Charges:

       

Interest expense, gross

     6,337         5,546        3,341   

Capitalized interest

     60         117        56   

Interest portion of rental expenses

     233         285        259   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total Fixed Charges

     6,630         5,948        3,656   

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges

     3.22         3.40        5.71   

 

Exhibit 8.1

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

The table below sets forth all of our direct and indirect significant subsidiaries and the percentage of equity of each subsidiary we owned directly or indirectly as of December 31, 2015:

 

Name of Company

   Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
   Percentage
Owned
    

Description

Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   Mexico      100.0%       Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.

Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   Mexico      100.0%       Holding company of manufacturers and distributors of beverages.

Spal Industria Brasileira de Bebidas, S.A.

   Brazil      96.1%       Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.

Distribuidora y Manufacturera del Valle de México, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   Mexico      100.0%       Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.

Servicios Refresqueros del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V.

   Mexico      100.0%       Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.

Coca-Cola FEMSA de Argentina, S.A.

   Argentina      100.0%       Manufacturer and distributor of bottled beverages.

Exhibit 12.1

Certification

I, John Anthony Santa Maria Otazua, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2016

 

/s/ John Anthony Santa Maria Otazua

John Anthony Santa Maria Otazua
Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 12.2

Certification

I, Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 15, 2016

 

/s/ Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez

Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez
Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., or the Company, does hereby certify, to

The Annual Report on form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015, or Form 20-F, of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: April 15, 2016    

/s/ John Anthony Santa Maria Otazua

   

John Anthony Santa Maria Otazua

Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 15, 2016    

/s/ Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez

   

Héctor Treviño Gutiérrez

Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3, No. 333-187275) of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V., Comercializadora La Pureza de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Controladora Interamericana de Bebidas, S. de R.L. de C.V., Servicios Integrados Inmuebles del Golfo, S. de R.L. de C.V., Refrescos Victoria del Centro, S. de R.L. de C.V., Yoli de Acapulco, S de R.L. de C.V., Grupo Embotellador Cimsa, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Propimex, S. de R.L. de C.V., of our reports dated April 15, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. and subsidiaries, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Coca-Cola FEMSA, S.A.B. de C.V. included in its Annual Report on Form 20-F, for the year ended December 31, 2015.

 

Mancera, S.C.

A member practice of

Ernst & Young Global

/s/ Adan Aranda Suarez
Adan Aranda Suarez

Mexico City, Mexico

April 15, 2016