RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below, as well as the other information contained in this prospectus. The risks described below are not the only risks facing us. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. In such a case, you may lose all or a part of your original investment.

Risks Related to Our Company’s Business

Our industry is highly competitive, cyclical and subject to intense price competition.

The offshore contract drilling industry, historically, has been very cyclical with periods of high demand, limited supply and high dayrates alternating with periods of low demand, excess supply and low dayrates. Many offshore drilling units are highly mobile. Competitors may move drilling units from region to region in response to changes in demand. According to industry sources, 85 jackup rigs and 19 deepwater rigs are scheduled for delivery from the shipyard through the remainder of 2016. While we do not anticipate that all of these rigs will be delivered, this excess supply of rigs is depressing the markets in which we operate. Periods of low demand and excess supply intensify competition in the industry and often result in some drilling units becoming idle for long periods of time. Prolonged periods of low utilization and dayrates, or extended idle time, could result in the recognition of impairment charges on our drilling units if cash flow estimates, based upon information available to management at the time, indicate that the carrying value of the drilling units may not be recoverable.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our debt obligations.

Following the completion of the Plan of Reorganization on February 10, 2016, we had approximately $969.1 million aggregate principal amount of debt outstanding, consisting of $143.0 million under the Credit Agreement, $76.1 million of our Senior Secured Notes and approximately $750.0 million of our Notes. Subject to the restrictions in our Credit Agreement and the indentures governing our Senior Secured Notes and our Notes, we may incur additional indebtedness. Our high level of indebtedness could have important consequences for an investment in us and significant effects on our business. For example, our level of indebtedness and the terms of our debt agreements may:

14

Table of Contents

Each of these factors may have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and viability. Our ability to satisfy our other debt obligations will depend on our future operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors affecting our company and industry, many of which are beyond our control.

Additionally, each of the agreements governing the Credit Agreement, the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes is subject to terms, conditions and covenants, a violation of which would constitute an event of default and could result in the acceleration of the maturity of the obligations. Compliance with certain of these covenants may be beyond our control and we cannot assure you that we will satisfy those requirements. In the event (A) the Company, any guarantor, or any restricted subsidiary that is a significant subsidiary or a group of subsidiaries that, taken together would constitute a significant subsidiary, within the meaning of bankruptcy law (i) commences a voluntary case, (ii) consents to the entry of an order for relief against it in an involuntary case, (iii) consents to the appointment of a custodian of it or for all or substantially all of its property (iv) makes a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors or (v) is generally not paying its debts as they come due, or (B) if a court of competent jurisdiction enters an order or decree under any bankruptcy law that is for relief in an involuntary case, appoints a custodian, or orders the liquidation of the Company, any guarantor, or any restricted subsidiary that is a significant subsidiary or a group of subsidiaries that, taken together would constitute a significant subsidiary (and the order or decree remains unstayed and in effect for 60 consecutive days), the secured debt obligations will automatically accelerate with no further action or notice by the debt holders.

If any other event of default under the terms of the Senior Secured Notes or Notes, the trustee or holders of at least 25% in aggregate principal amount of the then outstanding secured debt may declare the obligation due and payable. If there is any other event of default under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Administrative Agent may declare the obligations under the Credit Agreement immediately due and payable. An event of default or acceleration of any of the secured debt obligations will likely cross default and accelerate the other secured debt obligations.

In the event the Notes accelerate, the holders are entitled to the outstanding principal, accrued interest and a premium. The Applicable Premium is calculated as the greater of (i) 1% of the then outstanding principal amount and (ii) the difference between the present value, computed using a discount rate equal to the treasury rate plus 50 basis points, of the accreted value at maturity, less the outstanding principal of the Notes. The estimated Applicable Premium is in excess of $1.0 billion.

If the amounts outstanding in respect of our Credit Agreement, Senior Secured Notes and the Notes or any other indebtedness outstanding at such time were to be accelerated or were the subject of foreclosure actions, we cannot assure you that our assets would be sufficient to repay in full the money owed to the lenders or to our other debt holders.

We could be adversely affected by violations of the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. Our policies mandate compliance with these laws. We operate in many parts of the world that have experienced governmental corruption to some degree and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices. Despite our extensive training and compliance program, we cannot assure you that our internal control policies and procedures will always protect us from improper acts committed by our directors, employees or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could disrupt our business and result in a material adverse effect on our business and operations. We may be subject to competitive disadvantages to the extent that our competitors are able to secure business, licenses or other preferential treatment by making payments to government officials and others in positions of influence or using other methods that U.S. laws and regulations prohibit us from using.

15

Table of Contents

In order to effectively compete in some foreign jurisdictions, we utilize local agents and seek to establish joint ventures with local operators or strategic partners. Although we have procedures and controls in place to monitor internal and external compliance, if we are found to be liable for FCPA violations (either due to our own acts or omissions, or due to the acts or omissions of others, including actions taken by our agents and our strategic or local partners, even though our agents and partners may not be subject to the FCPA), we could suffer from civil and criminal penalties or other sanctions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In July 2015, we became aware of media reports that Hamylton Padilha, the Brazilian agent for the Company used in the contracting of the Titanium Explorer drillship to Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”), had entered into a plea arrangement with the Brazilian authorities in connection with his role in facilitating the payment of bribes to former Petrobras executives. Among other things, Mr. Padilha provided information to the Brazilian authorities of an alleged bribery scheme between former Petrobras executives and Mr. Hsin-Chi Su, who was, at the time of the alleged bribery scheme, a member of the Board of Directors and a significant shareholder of our predecessor company, Vantage Drilling Company. When we learned of Mr. Padilha’s plea agreement and the allegations, we voluntarily contacted the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”)and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to advise them of these recent developments, as well as the fact that we had engaged outside counsel to conduct an internal investigation of the allegations. Our internal investigation is ongoing and we are cooperating with the DOJ and SEC in their investigation of these allegations. In connection with our cooperation with the DOJ and SEC, we recently advised both agencies that in early 2010, we engaged outside counsel to investigate a report of allegations of improper payments to customs and immigration officials in Asia. That investigation was concluded in 2011, and we determined at that time that no disclosure was warranted; however, in an abundance of caution, we are reviewing the matter again in light of the allegations in the Petrobras matter. Although we cannot predict the outcome of this matter, if the DOJ or the SEC determine that violations of the FCPA have occurred, the Company could be subject to civil and criminal sanctions, including monetary penalties, as well as additional requirements or changes to our business practices and compliance programs, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Additionally, if we become subject to any judgment, decree, order, governmental penalty or fine, this may constitute an event of default under the terms of our secured debt agreements and result in our outstanding debt becoming immediately due and payable.

A continued reduction in expenditures by oil and natural gas exploration and production companies due to the current low level of oil and natural gas prices, a decrease in demand for oil and natural gas, or other factors, would adversely affect our business.

Our business, including the utilization rates and dayrates we achieve for our drilling units, depends on the level of activity in oil and natural gas exploration, development and production expenditures of our customers. Oil and natural gas prices and customers’ expectations of potential changes in these prices significantly affect this level of activity. Commodity prices are affected by numerous factors, including the following:

16

Table of Contents

In addition to oil and gas prices, the offshore drilling industry is influenced by additional factors, including:

Any of these factors could reduce demand for or prices paid for our services and adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Low prices for oil and natural gas may reduce demand for our services and could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability.

Demand for our services depends on oil and natural gas industry activity and expenditure levels that are directly affected by trends in oil and natural gas prices. In addition, demand for our services is particularly sensitive to the level of exploration, development and production activity of and the corresponding capital spending by, oil and natural gas companies. Any prolonged weakness in oil and natural gas prices could depress the near-term levels of exploration, development, and production activity. Perceptions of longer-term lower oil and natural gas prices by oil and natural gas companies could similarly reduce or defer major expenditures given the long- term nature of many large-scale development projects. Lower levels of activity result in a corresponding decline in the demand for our services, which could have a material adverse effect on our revenue and profitability. Additionally, these factors may adversely impact our financial position if they are determined to cause an impairment of our long- lived assets.

A small number of customers account for a significant portion of our revenues, and the loss of one or more of these customers could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. The concentration of revenue with a small number of customers also exposes us to credit risk of these customers for non-payment or contract termination.

We derive a significant portion of our revenues from a few customers. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, three customers accounted for approximately 32%, 25% and 20%, of our revenue. Three customers accounted for approximately 47%, 20% and 17% of consolidated revenue for the period from January 1, 2016 to February 10, 2016. Three customers accounted for approximately 58%, 18% and 14% of consolidated revenue for the period from February 10, 2016 to March 31, 2016. Our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if any one of these customers interrupts or curtails their activities, fails to

17

Table of Contents

pay for the services that have been performed, terminates their contracts, fails to renew their existing contracts or refuse to award new contracts and we are unable to enter into contracts with new customers on comparable terms. The loss of any of our significant customers could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our jackup drilling contracts are generally short-term, and we could experience reduced profitability if customers reduce activity levels, terminate or seek to renegotiate drilling contracts with us, or if market conditions dictate that we enter into contracts that provide for payment based on a footage or turnkey basis, rather than on a dayrate basis.

Many jackup drilling contracts are short-term, and oil and natural gas companies tend to reduce shallow water activity levels quickly in response to downward changes in oil and natural gas prices. Due to the short-term nature of most of our jackup drilling contracts, a decline in market conditions can quickly affect our business if customers reduce their levels of operations. During depressed market conditions, a customer may no longer need a unit that is currently under contract or may be able to obtain a comparable unit at a lower dayrate. As a result, customers may seek to renegotiate the terms of their existing drilling contracts or avoid their obligations under those contracts. In addition, our customers may have the right to terminate, or may seek to renegotiate, existing contracts if we experience excessive downtime, operational problems above the contractual limit or safety-related issues, if the drilling unit is a total loss, if the drilling unit is not delivered to the customer within the period specified in the contract or in other specified circumstances, which include events beyond the control of either party.

Some of our current jackup drilling contracts, and some drilling contracts that we may enter into in the future, may include terms allowing customers to terminate contracts without cause, with little or no prior notice and without penalty or early termination payments. In addition, we could be required to pay penalties, which could be material, if some of these contracts are terminated due to downtime, operational problems or failure to deliver. Some of the contracts with customers that we enter into in the future may be cancellable at the option of the customer upon payment of a penalty, which may not fully compensate us for the loss of the contract. Early termination of a contract may result in a drilling unit being idle for an extended period of time. The likelihood that a customer may seek to terminate a contract is increased during periods of market weakness. Under most of our contracts, it is an event of default if we file a petition for bankruptcy or reorganization, which would allow the customer to terminate such contract.

Currently, all of our jackup drilling contracts are dayrate contracts, where we charge a fixed rate per day regardless of the number of days needed to drill the well. While we plan to continue to perform services on a dayrate basis, market conditions may dictate that we enter into contracts that provide for payment based on a footage basis, where we are paid a fixed amount for each foot drilled regardless of the time required or the problems encountered in drilling the well, or enter into turnkey contracts, where we agree to drill a well to a specific depth for a fixed price and bear some of the well equipment costs. These types of contracts are riskier for us than a dayrate contract as we would be subject to downhole geologic conditions in the well that cannot always be accurately determined and subject us to greater risks associated with equipment and downhole tool failures. Unfavorable downhole geologic conditions and equipment and downhole tool failures may result in significant cost increases or may result in a decision to abandon a well project which would result in us not being able to invoice revenues for providing services. Any such termination or renegotiation of contracts and unfavorable costs increases or loss of revenue could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may not be able to replace expiring contracts for our existing rigs at dayrates that are economically feasible for us.

Due to the cyclical nature and high level of competition in our industry, we may not be able to replace expiring contracts. Our ability to replace expiring contracts will depend on prevailing market conditions, the specific needs of our customers, and numerous other factors beyond our control. Additionally, any contracts for our drilling units may be at dayrates that are below, or substantially below, existing dayrates, which could have a material adverse effect on our overall business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

18

Table of Contents

The agreements governing our Credit Agreement, Senior Secured Notes and Notes impose significant operating and financial restrictions on us and our subsidiaries that may prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities and restrict our ability to operate our business.

The agreements governing our Credit Agreement, Senior Secured Notes and Notes contain covenants that restrict our and our restricted subsidiaries’ ability to take various actions, such as:

We may also be prevented from taking advantage of business opportunities because of the limitations imposed on us by the restrictive covenants under the indentures governing the Credit Agreement, the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes. In addition, the restrictions contained may also limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions, meet capital needs or otherwise restrict our activities or business plans and adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, enter into acquisitions, execute our business strategy, effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted or engage in other business activities that would be in our interest. We are also subject to additional restrictions in our term loan agreements and revolving credit agreement, and in the future, we may also incur additional debt obligations that might subject us to additional and different restrictive covenants that could further affect our financial and operational flexibility. We cannot assure you that we will be granted waivers or amendments to these agreements if for any reason we are unable to comply with these agreements, or that we will be able to refinance our debt on acceptable terms or at all.

Our business is affected by local, national and worldwide economic conditions and the condition of the oil and natural gas industry.

Current economic conditions have resulted in uncertainty regarding energy and commodity prices. In addition, future economic conditions may cause many oil and natural gas production companies to further reduce or delay expenditures in order to reduce costs, which in turn may cause a further reduction in the demand for drilling services. If conditions worsen, our business and financial condition may be adversely impacted.

19

Table of Contents

There may be limits to our ability to mobilize drilling units between geographic markets and the time and costs of such drilling unit mobilizations may be material to our business.

The offshore contract drilling market is generally a global market as drilling units may be mobilized from one market to another market. However, geographic markets can, from time to time, have material fluctuations in costs and risks as the ability to mobilize drilling units can be impacted by several factors including, but not limited to, governmental regulation and customs practices, the significant costs to move a drilling unit, availability of tow boats or heavy lift vessels, weather, political instability, civil unrest, military actions, and the technical capability of the drilling units to operate in various environments. Any increase in the supply of drilling units in the geographic areas in which we operate, whether through new construction, refurbishment or conversion of drilling units from other uses, remobilization or changes in the law or its application, could increase competition and result in lower dayrates and/or utilization, which would adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, while a drilling unit is being mobilized from one geographic market to another, we may not be paid by the customer for the time that the drilling unit is out of service. Also, we may mobilize the drilling unit to another geographic market without a customer contract which will result in costs not reimbursable by future customers.

Our business involves numerous operating hazards, and our insurance and contractual indemnity rights may not be adequate to cover our losses.

Our operations are subject to the usual hazards inherent in the drilling and operation of oil and natural gas wells, such as blowouts, reservoir damage, loss of production, loss of well control, punch-throughs, craterings, fires and pollution. The occurrence of these events could result in the suspension of drilling or production operations, claims by the operator and others affected by such events, severe damage to, or destruction of, the property and equipment involved, injury or death to drilling unit personnel, environmental damage and increased insurance costs. We may also be subject to personal injury and other claims of drilling unit personnel as a result of our drilling operations. Operations also may be suspended because of machinery breakdowns, abnormal operating conditions, failure of subcontractors to perform or supply goods or services and personnel shortages.

In addition, our operations will be subject to perils particular to marine operations, including capsizing, grounding, collision and loss or damage from severe weather. Severe weather could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Our drilling units could be damaged by high winds, turbulent seas, or unstable sea bottom conditions which could potentially cause us to curtail operations for significant periods of time until such damages are repaired.

Damage to the environment could result from our operations, particularly through oil spillage or extensive uncontrolled fires. We may also be subject to property, environmental and other damage claims by host governments, oil and natural gas companies and other businesses operating offshore and in coastal areas, as well as claims by individuals living in or around coastal areas.

As is customary in our industry, the risks of our operations are partially covered by our insurance and partially by contractual indemnities from our customers. However, insurance policies and contractual rights to indemnity may not adequately cover losses, and we may not have insurance coverage or rights to indemnity for all risks. Moreover, pollution and environmental risks generally are not fully insurable. If a significant accident or other event resulting in damage to our drilling units, including severe weather, terrorist acts, war, civil disturbances, pollution or environmental damage, occurs and is not fully covered by insurance or a recoverable indemnity from a customer, it could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our offshore drilling operations could be adversely impacted by changes in regulation of offshore oil and gas exploration and development activity.

Offshore drilling operations in the United States and elsewhere could be adversely impacted by changes in regulation of offshore oil and gas exploration and development activities. Significant new requirements with respect to development and production activities in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico have been imposed in recent years. These new requirements generally relate to the design of wells and testing of the integrity of wellbores, the use of drilling fluids, the functionality and testing of well control equipment, including blowout preventers, and other environmental and safety matters.

20

Table of Contents

Customers may be unable or unwilling to indemnify us.

Consistent with standard industry practice, our customers generally assume liability for and indemnify us against well control and subsurface risks under our dayrate contracts, and we do not separately purchase insurance for such indemnified risks. These risks are those associated with the loss of control of a well, such as blowout or cratering, the cost to regain control or redrill the well and associated pollution. In the future, we may not be able to obtain agreements from customers to indemnify us for such damages and risks or the indemnities that we do obtain may be limited in scope and duration. Additionally, even if our customers agree to indemnify us, there can be no assurance that they will necessarily be financially able to indemnify us against all of these risks.

Our insurance coverage may not be adequate if a catastrophic event occurs.

As a result of the number and significance of catastrophic events in the history of the offshore drilling industry, such as hurricanes and spills in the Gulf of Mexico, insurance underwriters have increased insurance premiums and increased restrictions on coverage and have made other coverages, such as Gulf of Mexico windstorm coverage, unavailable to us on commercially reasonable terms.

While we believe we have reasonable policy limits of property, casualty, liability, and business interruption insurance, including coverage for acts of terrorism, with financially sound insurers, we cannot guarantee that our policy limits for property, casualty, liability, and business interruption insurance, including coverage for severe weather, terrorist acts, war, civil disturbances, pollution or environmental damage, would be adequate should a catastrophic event occur related to our property, plant or equipment, or that our insurers would have adequate financial resources to sufficiently or fully pay related claims or damages. When any of our coverage expires, or when we seek coverage in the future, we cannot guarantee that adequate coverage will be available, offered at reasonable prices, or offered by insurers with sufficient financial soundness. Additionally, we do not have third party windstorm insurance and we may not have windstorm insurance for any vessel that we operate in the Gulf of Mexico in the future. The occurrence of an incident or incidents affecting any one or more of our drilling units could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and future results of operations if asset damage and/or our liability were to exceed insurance coverage limits or if an insurer was unable to sufficiently or fully pay related claims or damages.

Our international operations are subject to additional political, economic, legal and other uncertainties not generally associated with domestic operations.

A primary component of our business strategy is to operate in international oil and natural gas producing areas. Our international operations are subject to a number of risks inherent in any business operating in foreign countries, including:

21

Table of Contents

Our financial condition and results of operations could be susceptible to adverse events beyond our control that may occur in the particular countries or regions in which we are active. Additionally, we may experience currency exchange losses where, at some future date, revenues are received and expenses are paid in nonconvertible currencies or where we do not hedge exposure to a foreign currency. We may also incur losses as a result of an inability to collect revenues because of a shortage of convertible currency available in the country of operation, controls over currency exchange or controls over the repatriation of income or capital.

Many governments favor or effectively require that drilling contracts be awarded to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. These practices may result in inefficiencies or put us at a disadvantage when bidding for contracts against local competitors.

Our offshore contract drilling operations are subject to various laws and regulations in countries in which we operate, including laws and regulations relating to the equipment and operation of drilling units, currency conversions and repatriation, oil and natural gas exploration and development, taxation of offshore earnings and earnings of expatriate personnel, the use of local employees and suppliers by foreign contractors and duties on the importation and exportation of drilling units and other equipment. Governments in some foreign countries have become increasingly active in regulating and controlling the ownership of concessions and companies holding concessions, the exploration for oil and natural gas and other aspects of the oil and natural gas industries in their countries. In some areas of the world, this governmental activity has adversely affected the amount of exploration and development work done by major oil and natural gas companies and may continue to do so. Operations in less developed countries can be subject to legal systems which are not as predictable as those in more developed countries, which can lead to greater uncertainty in legal matters and proceedings.

Our business is subject to numerous governmental laws and regulations, including those that may impose significant costs and liability on us for environmental and natural resource damages.

Many aspects of our operations are affected by governmental laws and regulations that may relate directly or indirectly to the contract drilling industry, including those requiring us to control the discharge of oil and other contaminants into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. Countries where we currently operate have environmental laws and regulations covering the discharge of oil and other contaminants and protection of the environment in connection with operations. Operations and activities in the United States and its territorial waters are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations, including the U.S. Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act, the U.S. Oil Pollution Act (the “OPA”), the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, the Clean Air Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and MARPOL. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of remedial obligations, the denial or revocation of permits or other authorizations and the issuance of injunctions that may limit or prohibit operations.

Laws and regulations protecting the environment have become more stringent in recent years and may in certain circumstances impose strict liability, rendering us liable for environmental and natural resource damages without regard to negligence or fault on our part. These laws and regulations may expose us to liability for the conduct of,

22

Table of Contents

or conditions caused by, others or for acts that were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time the acts were performed. The application of these requirements, the modification of existing laws or regulations or the adoption of new laws or regulations relating to exploratory or development drilling for oil and natural gas could materially limit future contract drilling opportunities or materially increase our costs. In addition, we may be required to make significant capital expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations.

In addition some financial institutions are imposing, as a condition to financing, requirements to comply with additional non-governmental environmental and social standards in connection with operations outside the United States, such as the Equator Principles, a credit risk management framework for determining, assessing and managing environmental and social risk in project finance transactions. Such additional standards could impose significant new costs on us, which may materially and adversely affect us.

Changes in U.S. federal laws and regulations, or in those of other jurisdictions where we operate, including those that may impose significant costs and liability on us for environmental and natural resource damages, may adversely affect our operations.

If the U.S. government amends or enacts new federal laws or regulations, our potential exposure to liability for operations and activities in the United States and its territorial waters may increase. Although the OPA provides federal caps on liability for pollution or contamination, future laws and regulations may increase our liability for pollution or contamination resulting from any operations and activities we may have in the United States and its territorial waters including punitive damages, and administrative, civil and criminal penalties. Additionally, the jurisdictions where we operate have modified or may in the future modify their laws and regulations in a manner that would increase our liability for pollution and other environmental damage.

Construction projects are subject to risks, including delays and cost overruns, which could have an adverse impact on our liquidity and results of operations.

As part of our growth strategy we may contract from time to time for the construction of drilling units or may enter into agreements to manage the construction of drilling units for others. Construction projects are subject to the risks of delay or cost overruns inherent in any large construction project, including costs or delays resulting from the following:

23

Table of Contents

If we experience delays and costs overruns in the construction of drilling units due to certain of the factors listed above, it could also adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

New technology and/or products may cause us to become less competitive.

The offshore contract drilling industry is subject to the introduction of new drilling techniques and services using new technologies, some of which may be subject to patent protection. As competitors and others use or develop new technologies, we may be placed at a competitive disadvantage. Further, we may face competitive pressure to implement or acquire certain new technologies at a substantial cost. Some of our competitors have greater financial, technical and personnel resources that may allow them to access technological advantages and implement new technologies before we can. We cannot be certain that we will be able to implement new technology or products on a timely basis or at an acceptable cost. Thus, our inability to effectively use and implement new and emerging technology may have a material and adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Our information technology systems and those of our service providers are subject to cybersecurity risks and threats.

We depend on information technology systems that we manage, and others that are managed by our third-party service and equipment providers, to conduct our operations, including critical systems on our drilling units, and these systems are subject to risks associated with cyber incidents or attacks. It has been reported that unknown entities or groups have mounted cyber-attacks on businesses and other organizations solely to disable or disrupt computer systems, disrupt operations and, in some cases, steal data. Due to the nature of cyber-attacks, breaches to our or our service or equipment providers’ systems could go unnoticed for a prolonged period of time. These cybersecurity risks could disrupt our operations and result in downtime, loss of revenue, or the loss of critical data as well as result in higher costs to correct and remedy the effects of such incidents. If our or our service or equipment providers’ systems for protecting against cyber incidents or attacks prove to be insufficient and an incident were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Currently, we do not carry insurance for losses related to cybersecurity attacks, and may elect to not obtain such insurance in the future.

Our financial condition may be adversely affected if we are unable to identify and complete future acquisitions, fail to successfully integrate acquired assets or businesses we acquire, or are unable to obtain financing for acquisitions on acceptable terms.

The acquisition of assets or businesses that we believe to be complementary to our drilling operations is an important component of our business strategy. We believe that acquisition opportunities may arise from time to time, and that any such acquisition could be significant. At any given time, discussions with one or more potential sellers may be at different stages. However, any such discussions may not result in the consummation of an acquisition transaction, and we may not be able to identify or complete any acquisitions. We cannot predict the effect, if any, that any announcement or consummation of an acquisition would have on the trading price of our securities. Our business is capital intensive and any such transactions could involve the payment by us of a substantial amount of cash. We may need to raise additional capital through public or private debt or equity financings to execute our growth strategy and to fund acquisitions. Adequate sources of capital may not be available when needed on acceptable terms. If we raise additional capital by issuing additional equity securities, existing shareholders may be diluted. If our capital resources are insufficient at any time in the future, we may be unable to fund acquisitions, take advantage of business opportunities or respond to competitive pressures, any of which could harm our business.

Any future acquisitions could present a number of risks, including:

24

Table of Contents

If we are unsuccessful in completing acquisitions of other operations or assets, our financial condition could be adversely affected and we may be unable to implement an important component of our business strategy successfully. In addition, if we are unsuccessful in integrating our acquisitions in a timely and cost-effective manner, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Operating and maintenance costs will not necessarily fluctuate in proportion to changes in operating revenues.

We cannot predict what operating and maintenance costs will fluctuate in proportion to changes in operating revenues. Operating revenues may fluctuate as a function of changes in dayrates. However, costs for operating a drilling unit are generally fixed or only semi-variable regardless of the dayrate being earned. In addition, should the drilling units incur idle time between contracts, we would typically maintain the crew to prepare the drilling unit for its next contract and may not be able to reduce costs to correspond to the decrease in revenue. During times of moderate activity, reductions in costs may not be immediate as the crew may be required to prepare the drilling units for stacking, after which time the crew will be reduced to a level necessary to maintain the drilling unit in working condition with the extra crew members assigned to active drilling units or dismissed. In addition, as drilling units are mobilized from one geographic location to another, the labor and other operating and maintenance costs can vary significantly. Equipment maintenance expenses fluctuate depending upon the type of activity the drilling unit is performing and the age and condition of the equipment. Contract preparation expenses vary based on the scope and length of contract preparation required and the duration of the firm contractual period over which such expenditures are amortized.

The loss of some of our key executive officers and employees could negatively impact our business prospects.

Our future operational performance depends to a significant degree upon the continued service of key members of our management as well as marketing, sales and operations personnel. The loss of one or more of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business. We believe our future success will also depend in large part upon our ability to attract, retain and further motivate highly skilled management, marketing, sales and operations personnel. We may experience intense competition for personnel, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to retain key employees or that we will be successful in attracting, assimilating and retaining personnel in the future.

Failure to employ a sufficient number of skilled workers or an increase in labor costs could hurt our operations.

We require skilled personnel to operate and provide technical services to, and support for, our drilling units. In periods of increasing activity and when the number of operating units in our areas of operation increases, either because of new construction, re-activation of idle units or the mobilization of units into the region, shortages of qualified personnel could arise, creating upward pressure on wages and difficulty in staffing. The shortages of qualified personnel or the inability to obtain and retain qualified personnel also could negatively affect the quality and timeliness of our work. In addition, our ability to expand operations depends in part upon our ability to increase the size of the skilled labor force.

Consolidation of suppliers may increase the cost of obtaining supplies, which may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.

We rely on certain third parties to provide supplies and services necessary for our offshore drilling operations, including, but not limited to, drilling equipment suppliers, catering and machinery suppliers. Recent mergers have reduced the number of available suppliers, resulting in fewer alternatives for sourcing key supplies. Such consolidation, combined with a high volume of drilling units under construction, may result in a shortage of supplies and services thereby increasing the cost of supplies and/or potentially inhibiting the ability of suppliers to deliver on time, or at all. These cost increases, delays or unavailability could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and result in drilling unit downtime, and delays in the repair and maintenance of our drilling units.

25

Table of Contents

While we believe that we currently have adequate internal control procedures in place, we are still exposed to potential risks from the requirement that we evaluate our internal controls under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

We have evaluated our internal controls systems in order to allow management to report on our internal controls, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We have performed the system and process evaluation and testing required to comply with the management certification requirements of Section 404. As a result, we have incurred additional expenses and a diversion of management’s time. While we have been able to fully implement the requirements relating to internal controls and all other aspects of Section 404 in a timely fashion, we cannot be certain that our internal control over financial reporting will be adequate in the future to ensure compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act or the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. If we are not able to maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting, we may be susceptible to sanctions or investigation by regulatory authorities, such as the DOJ and the SEC. Any such action could adversely affect our financial results and the market price of our securities.

Changes in tax laws, treaties or regulations, effective tax rates or adverse outcomes resulting from examination of our tax returns could adversely affect our financial results.

Our future effective tax rates could be adversely affected by changes in tax laws, treaties, and regulations both internationally and domestically. Tax laws, treaties and regulations are highly complex and subject to interpretation. We are subject to changing tax laws, treaties and regulations in and between the countries in which we operate. Our income tax expense is based upon the interpretation of the tax laws in effect in various countries at the time that the expense was incurred. A change in these tax laws, treaties or regulations, or in the interpretation thereof, could result in a materially higher tax expense or a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings. If any country successfully challenges our income tax filings based on our structure or the presence of our operations there, or if we otherwise lose a material dispute, our effective tax rate on worldwide earnings could increase substantially and our financial results could be materially adversely affected.

We may be required to repurchase certain of our indebtedness with cash upon a change of control or other triggering events.

Upon the occurrence of specified change of control events or certain losses of our vessels in the agreements governing our Credit Agreement, Senior Secured Notes or Notes, we will be required to offer to repurchase or repay all (or in the case of events of losses of vessels, an amount up to the amount of proceeds received from such event of loss) of such outstanding debt under such debt agreements at the prices and upon the terms set forth in the applicable agreements. In addition, in connection with certain asset sales, we will be required to offer to repurchase or repay such outstanding debt as set forth in the applicable debt agreements. We may not have sufficient funds available to repurchase or repay all of the debt that becomes due and payable pursuant to any such offer, which would constitute an event of default which in turn would likely trigger a default under our existing and any future debt agreements. Moreover, the holders and lenders under such debt agreements and any other of our future debt agreements may also limit our ability to repurchase debt. In that event, we would need to cure or refinance the applicable debt agreements before making an offer to purchase. Additionally, our existing debt agreements and any future indebtedness we incur may restrict our ability to repurchase these notes, including following a fundamental change. We may be unable to repay all of such indebtedness or obtain a waiver. Any requirement to offer to repurchase or repay any of our existing debt may therefore require us to refinance some or all of our other outstanding debt, which we may not be able to accomplish on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. These repurchase requirements may also delay or make it more difficult for others to obtain control of us.

Because we are incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands, stakeholders may face difficulties in protecting their interests, and their ability to protect their rights through the U.S. federal courts may be limited.

We are an exempted company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands. In addition, substantially all of our assets are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult for holders of our securities to effect service of process within the United States upon our directors or executive officers, or enforce judgments obtained in the U.S. courts against our directors or executive officers.

26

Table of Contents

Our corporate affairs are governed by our Second Amended and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association (the “Memorandum and Articles”), the Companies Law (the “Companies Law”) (as the same may be supplemented or amended from time to time) of the Cayman Islands, and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of holders of our securities to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are, to a large extent, governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from English common law, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are different from those under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a different body of securities laws which may provide significantly less protection to investors as compared to the United States, and some states, such as Delaware, which have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law.

The Cayman Islands courts are also unlikely:

Additionally, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to sue before the federal courts of the United States. There is no statutory recognition in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the United States, although the courts of the Cayman Islands recognize and enforce a non-penal judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without re-examination of the merits of the underlying dispute, provided such judgment:

The Grand Court of the Cayman Islands may stay proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.

We remain subject to litigation relating to our reorganization proceedings.

In connection with our bankruptcy cases, two appeals were filed relating to the confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization. Specifically, on January 29, 2016, Hsin Chi Su and F3 Capital filed two appeals before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware seeking a reversal of (i) the Court’s determination that Hsin Chi Su and F3 Capital did not have standing to appear and be heard in the bankruptcy cases, which was made on the record at a hearing held on January 14, 2016, and (ii) the Court’s Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order (I) Approving the Debtors’ (A) Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Sections 1125 and 1126(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, (B) Solicitation of Votes and Voting Procedures, and (C) Forms of Ballots, and (II) Confirming the Amended Joint Prepackaged Chapter 11 Plan of Offshore Group Investment Limited and its Affiliated Debtors [Docket No. 188], which was entered on January 15, 2016. We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of any such appeals. An adverse outcome could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

27

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Investment in our Company’s Securities

We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our debt obligations.

Following the completion of the Plan of Reorganization on February 10, 2016, on a consolidated basis, the Company had a debt outstanding of approximately $969.1 million aggregate principal amount, which consisted of $143.0 million under the Credit Agreement, approximately $750.0 million under the Notes, and approximately $76.1 million under the Senior Secured Notes. Our high level of indebtedness and the funds required to service such debt could, among other things, make it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its obligations under such indebtedness, increasing the risk that it may default on such debt obligations.

The Company’s earnings and cash flow may vary significantly from year to year due to the cyclical nature of the offshore drilling industry. Additionally, the Company’s future cash flow may be insufficient to meet its debt obligations and commitments, including the Notes. Any insufficiency could negatively impact the Company’s business. A range of economic, competitive, business, and industry factors will affect the Company’s future financial performance and, as a result, its ability to generate cash flow from operations and to pay its debt, including the Notes. Many of these factors, such as oil and natural gas prices, economic and financial conditions in the offshore drilling industry and the oil and gas industry, as well as the global economy or competitive initiatives of competitors, are beyond the Company’s control. If the Company does not generate enough cash flow from operations to satisfy its debt obligations, it may have to undertake alternative financing plans, such as:

It cannot be assured, however, that undertaking alternative financing plans, if necessary, would allow the Company to meet its debt obligations. An inability to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy its debt obligations, including obligations under the Notes, or to obtain alternative financing, could materially and adversely affect the Company’s ability to make payments on the Notes and its business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

There is no public market for our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, and there can be no assurance as to the development or liquidity of any market for any such securities.

There are substantial risks in investing in our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares given the general illiquid nature of such securities. There is no public trading market for our securities. Holders of our securities may find it difficult or impossible to find a qualified purchaser for such securities at any price. Because of this, it is hard to determine exactly the value of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

If a market for the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares develops, they may trade at a discount from the purchase price thereof.

If a market for the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares develops, they may trade at a discount from the purchase price thereof. The trading market for the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares may be adversely affected by, among other things:

28

Table of Contents

The price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you may not be able to resell your Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares at or above the offering price.

The price for our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares may be volatile and may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including, among others:

These and other factors may lower the price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the event of a drop in the price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, you could lose a substantial part or all of your investment in our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of securities of many companies. In the past, holders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, we could incur substantial costs and our resources and the attention of management could be diverted from our business.

Future sales of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, or the perception that these sales may occur, may depress the price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares.

Additional sales of a substantial number of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, or the perception that such sales may occur, could have a material adverse effect on the price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares. As of June 10, 2016, the selling holders beneficially own approximately 61.35% of our Stapled Securities and 53.31% of our Ordinary Shares. The sale of all or a portion of the Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares by the selling holders or our other holders, or the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares to decrease significantly.

Pursuant to the Company’s Registration Rights Agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), the selling holders have certain demand and piggyback rights that may require us to file additional registration statements registering their Stapled Securities or to include sales of such Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other holders. Any Stapled Securities sold under these registration statements or this prospectus will be freely tradable. In the event such registration rights are exercised and a large number of Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares is sold, such sales could reduce the trading price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares. These sales also could impede our ability to raise future capital. Additionally, we will bear all expenses in connection with this registration and any such registrations, except that the selling holders may be responsible for their pro rata shares of underwriters’ discounts and commissions, if any, and certain other expenses.

29

Table of Contents

The ownership percentage represented by the Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares is subject to dilution, and future issuances of Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares may depress the market price of our Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares.

The ownership percentage represented by the Stapled Securities and Ordinary Shares is subject to dilution from issuances in connection with the Management Incentive Plan, conversion of the Stapled Securities (in the case of the Ordinary Shares), any other shares that may be issued, and the conversion of any options, warrants, convertible securities, exercisable securities, or other securities that may be issued.

In particular, conversion of the Stapled Securities will dilute the ownership interest of any existing shareholders. Also, in the future, similar to all companies, additional equity financings or other share issuances by the Company on a consolidated basis could adversely affect the value of the Ordinary Shares issuable upon such conversion. The amount and dilutive effect of any of the foregoing could be material.

Such future issuances or conversions may depress the market price of our Stapled Securities or Ordinary Shares, and may impair our ability to raise additional capital in the financial markets at a time and price favorable to us.

Certain holders have significant influence over us, and their interests might conflict with or differ from your interests as a holder.

Certain holders of allowed secured debt claims acquired a significant ownership interest in the Ordinary Shares pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. If such holders were to act as a group, such holders would be in a position to control the outcome of all actions requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors, without the approval of other shareholders. This concentration of ownership could also facilitate or hinder a negotiated change of control of the Company and, consequently, have an impact upon the value of the Ordinary Shares.

Your equity interests are subordinated to our indebtedness.

In any subsequent liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company, the Ordinary Shares would rank below all debt claims against the Company, including the Credit Agreement, the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes. As a result, holders of the Ordinary Shares would not be entitled to receive any payment or other distribution of assets upon the liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of the Company until after all the Company’s obligations to their debt holders had been satisfied, including payments to lenders under the Credit Agreement and holders of the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes.

We have no current intention to pay cash dividends.

We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on the Ordinary Shares in the immediate future as we expect to retain any future cash flows for debt reduction and growth. As a result, the success of an investment in the Ordinary Shares will depend entirely upon any future appreciation in the value of the Ordinary Shares. There is, however, no guarantee that the Ordinary Shares will appreciate in value or even maintain their initial value.

We may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage.

Even with our existing level of debt, we and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial amounts of additional secured and unsecured indebtedness in the future, including debt under future credit facilities, some or all of which may be secured on a first priority basis. Although the terms of any present or future credit facilities limit our ability to incur additional debt, these terms do not and will not prohibit us from incurring substantial amounts of additional debt for specific purposes or under certain circumstances. If new debt is added to our and our subsidiaries’ current debt levels, the related risks that we and they now face could intensify and could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage.

We may have insufficient funds to repurchase the Notes as required by the Indenture.

Under the terms of the Indenture, the Company may, at the holder’s option, be required to repurchase all or a portion of the Notes, in the event of a change of control or upon certain sales of assets. Additionally, the Company will be required to redeem the Notes upon certain events of loss of a Vessel.

30

Table of Contents

In addition, under the terms of the Indenture, the Notes will become due and payable at a make-whole price specified therein upon the occurrence of any event of default provided therein. The Company on a consolidated basis may not have enough funds to pay the repurchase price, the redemption price or the make-whole price on the repurchase date, the redemption date or due date thereof, as applicable.

The terms of the Notes do not have the benefit of fulsome restrictive covenants, and the Notes may be negatively impacted in the event of certain transactions.

The Indenture might not protect you from several kinds of transactions that may adversely affect you. In particular, the Indenture will not contain covenants that limit our ability to pay dividends on, make distributions on, or redeem our share capital and, therefore, our ability to make interest payments and the value of the Notes may be negatively impacted in the event of a highly leveraged transaction or other similar transaction. Nor will the Indenture restrict the incurrence of indebtedness by our subsidiaries.

We will not have an obligation to make a repurchase offer following acquisitions, refinancings, recapitalizations or other transactions that could affect our capital structure, such as the acquisition of all or a substantial portion of our company by another entity or the consummation of a merger transaction, except in certain circumstances. The offshore drilling industry has seen significant consolidation in recent years with larger companies acquiring their smaller competitors. If we consummate such a transaction, there can be no assurance that such a transaction will require us to make an offer to repurchase the Notes.

The conversion rate of the Notes may not be adjusted for all dilutive events that may adversely affect the trading price of the Notes or the Ordinary Shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes.

The conversion rate of the Notes is subject to adjustment upon certain events, including the issuance of dividends on our Ordinary Shares, the issuance of rights or warrants, subdivisions, combinations, distributions of capital stock, indebtedness or assets, cash dividends and issuer tender or exchange offers as described under “Description of the Notes — Conversion Rights — Conversion Rate Adjustment.” The conversion rate will not be adjusted for other events, including, events that may adversely affect the trading price of the Notes or the Ordinary Shares issuable upon conversion of the notes.

Vantage Drilling International is a holding company and is dependent upon cash flows from its subsidiaries to meet its obligations.

Vantage Drilling International is a holding company, and as such, it conducts its operations through, most of its assets are owned by, and its operating income and cash flow are generated by, its subsidiaries. The Company is dependent upon cash flows from its subsidiaries to meet its debt service and related obligations, including the obligation to repurchase all or a portion of the Notes in the event of a change of control, as defined in the Indenture, or to pay the make-whole premium on the Notes required by the Indenture upon the occurrence of an event of default thereunder. Contractual provisions or laws, as well as its subsidiaries’ financial conditions and operating requirements, may limit the Company’s ability to obtain, from such subsidiaries, the cash required to meet such debt service or related obligations. Applicable tax laws may also subject such payments to further taxation. The inability to obtain cash from its subsidiaries may limit the Company’s ability to meet its debt service and related obligations even though there may be sufficient resources on a consolidated basis to satisfy such obligations.

If the Notes are rated investment grade at any time by both Rating Agencies and no default has occurred and is continuing under the Indenture, certain covenants contained in the Indenture will be suspended, and the holders of the Notes will lose the protection of these covenants.

The Indenture governing the Notes contains certain covenants that will be suspended and cease to have any effect from and after the first date when the Notes receive a rating equal to or higher than Baa3 (or the equivalent) by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc., or any successor to the rating agency business thereof (“Moody’s”) and BBB- (or the equivalent) by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services or any successor to the rating agency business thereof (“Standard & Poor’s and, together with Moody’s, the “Rating Agencies” and each rating above such level, an “Investment Grade Rating”). See “Description of the Notes—Certain Covenants.” These covenants restrict our ability to sell certain assets and require certain Restricted Subsidiaries to guarantee the Notes. Because these

31

Table of Contents

restrictions would not apply to the Notes at any time the Notes receive an Investment Grade Rating from both Rating Agencies, the holders of the Notes would not be able to prevent us from, among other things, making certain asset sales. If after these covenants are suspended, the Rating Agencies were to downgrade their ratings of the Notes to a non-investment grade level, the covenants would be reinstated and the holders of the Notes would again have the protection of these covenants. However, any transactions entered into during such time as the Notes had an Investment Grade Rating would be permitted to remain in effect.

There may not be sufficient collateral to pay all or any portion of the Notes.

The indebtedness under the Credit Agreement is secured, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens, on a first-priority basis by security interests in substantially all assets of the Company on a consolidated basis (henceforth, the “collateral”). The Senior Secured Notes and the Notes will be secured, subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens, on a second-priority and a third-priority basis, respectively, by security interests in substantially all of the Company’s assets.

In the event of a foreclosure on the collateral (or a distribution in respect thereof in a bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding), the proceeds from the collateral securing the Notes may not be sufficient to satisfy the obligations outstanding under such Notes because the proceeds would, under the Third Lien Intercreditor Agreement (as defined herein), first be applied to satisfy the Company’s obligations under the Credit Agreement and the Senior Secured Notes. Only after all of the obligations under the Credit Agreement and the obligations under the Senior Secured Notes have been satisfied will any remaining proceeds from the collateral on which the Notes have a third-priority lien be applied to satisfy the Company’s obligations under the Stapled Securities.

There may be defects in the collateral securing the Notes.

The collateral securing the Notes may be subject to exceptions, defects, encumbrances, liens, and other imperfections. Further, the Company has not conducted appraisals of all of its assets constituting collateral securing the Notes to determine if the value of the collateral upon foreclosure or liquidation equals or exceeds the amount of the Notes or such other obligation secured by the collateral. Accordingly, it cannot be assured that the remaining proceeds from a sale of the collateral would be sufficient to repay holders of the Notes all amounts owed under such Notes.

Additionally, the fair market value of the collateral is subject to fluctuations based on factors that include, among others, the condition of the offshore drilling industry, the ability to sell collateral in an orderly manner, general economic conditions, the availability of buyers, the Company’s failure to implement its business strategy, and similar factors. The amount received upon a sale of collateral would be dependent on numerous factors, including, but not limited to, the actual fair market value of the collateral at such time, and the timing and manner of the sale. By its nature, portions of the collateral may be illiquid and may have no readily ascertainable market value. In the event of a subsequent foreclosure, liquidation, bankruptcy, or similar proceeding, it cannot be assured that the proceeds from any sale or liquidation of the collateral will be sufficient to pay the Company’s obligations under the Notes, in full or at all, after first satisfying the obligations under the Credit Agreement in full and after satisfying the obligations under the Senior Secured Notes, which are more senior to the Notes. There can also be no assurance that the collateral will be saleable, and, even if saleable, the timing of its liquidation would be uncertain. Accordingly, there may not be sufficient collateral to pay all or any of the amounts due on the Notes.

The Notes are subject to Intercreditor Agreements that provide that the holders’ rights to receive payments on the Notes will be effectively subordinated to the lenders and other secured parties under the Credit Agreement who have a first-priority security interest in the Collateral and the holders of the Senior Secured Notes who have a second-priority interest in the Collateral.

The Collateral is subject to first-priority liens in favor of the lenders and other secured parties under the Credit Agreement. The Intercreditor Agreements provides, among other things, that in the event that the Company is declared bankrupt, becomes insolvent or is liquidated or reorganized, their obligations under the Credit Agreement are entitled to be paid in full from the Collateral pledged as security for such obligation before any payment may be made with respect to the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes and that the Senior Secured Notes are entitled to be paid in full from the Collateral pledged as security for such obligation before any payment may be made with respect to the Notes. Holders of the Notes would then be entitled to be paid from the remaining Collateral. See “Description of the Notes—Security—Intercreditor Agreements—Subordination of Note Obligations.

32

Table of Contents

Rights of holders of the Notes in the collateral may be adversely affected by the failure to perfect liens on the collateral or on collateral acquired in the future.

The failure to properly perfect liens on the collateral could adversely affect the collateral agent’s ability to enforce its rights with respect to the collateral for the benefit of the holders of the Notes. In addition, applicable law requires that certain property and rights acquired after the grant of a general security interest or lien can only be perfected at the time such property and rights are acquired and identified. There can be no assurance that the trustee or the collateral agent will monitor, or that the Company on a consolidated basis will inform the trustee or the collateral agent of the future acquisition of property and rights that constitute collateral, and that the necessary action will be taken to properly perfect the security interest in such after-acquired collateral. The trustee and the collateral agent have no obligation to monitor the acquisition of additional property or rights that constitute collateral or the perfection of any security interests therein. Such failure may result in the loss of the practical benefits of the liens thereon or of the priority of the liens securing the Notes against third parties.

The Indenture and the Intercreditor Agreements place limitations on rights of holders of the Notes.

The rights of the holders of the Notes with respect to the collateral securing such Notes will be substantially limited by the terms of the lien ranking agreements set forth in the Indenture and the Intercreditor Agreements (the “Intercreditor Agreements”), even during an event of default. Under the Indenture and the Intercreditor Agreements, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the higher priority liens are outstanding, any actions that may be taken with respect to (or in respect of) such collateral, including the ability to cause the commencement of enforcement proceedings against such collateral and to control the conduct of such proceedings, and the approval of amendments to, releases of such collateral from the lien of, and waivers of past defaults under, such documents relating to such collateral, will be at the direction of the holders of the obligations secured by the first-priority liens, and the holders of the Senior Secured Notes (secured by second-priority liens) and the Notes (secured by third-priority liens) may be adversely affected. Under the terms of the Intercreditor Agreements, at any time that obligations that have the benefit of the first-priority liens on the collateral are outstanding, if the holders of such indebtedness release the collateral in connection with any sale of collateral or in connection with any enforcement action or other exercise of remedies, the second-priority and third-priority security interests in such collateral securing the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes will be automatically and simultaneously released without any consent or action by the holders of the Senior Secured Notes or the Notes, subject to certain exceptions. The collateral so released will no longer secure the Company’s obligations under the Senior Secured Notes or the Notes and the related guarantees. To the extent the obligations with respect to the Credit Agreement were to be discharged without comparable replacement in the future, the foregoing risks will apply mutatis mutandis to the relationship between the second-priority security interests of the Senior Secured Notes and the third-priority security interests of the Notes, as if they were first-priority and second-priority secured interests, respectively.

The collateral will be subject to casualty risks.

The Company will be obligated under the Indenture and collateral agreements governing the Notes to maintain adequate insurance or otherwise insure against hazards as is customarily done by companies having assets of a similar nature in the same or similar localities. There are, however, certain losses that may either be uninsurable or not economically insurable, in whole or in part, including windstorm insurance for drilling units operating in the Gulf of Mexico. As a result, it is possible that the insurance proceeds will not compensate the Company fully for its losses. If there is a total or partial loss of any of the pledged collateral, the insurance proceeds received may be insufficient to satisfy the secured obligations of the Company, including the Senior Secured Notes and the Notes.

Rights of holders of Notes in the collateral may be adversely affected by bankruptcy proceedings.

The right of the collateral agent to repossess and dispose of the collateral securing the Notes and the guarantees and the other pari passu obligations upon acceleration is likely to be significantly impaired by federal bankruptcy law if bankruptcy proceedings are commenced by or against parent or the issuer prior to or possibly even after the collateral agent has repossessed and disposed of the collateral. Under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, a secured creditor,

33

Table of Contents

such as the collateral agent for the holders of the Notes, is prohibited from repossessing its security from a debtor in a bankruptcy case, or from disposing of security repossessed from a debtor, without bankruptcy court approval. Moreover, bankruptcy law permits the debtor to continue to retain and to use collateral, and the proceeds, products, rents or profits of the collateral, even though the debtor is in default under the applicable debt instruments, provided that the secured creditor is given “adequate protection.” The meaning of the term “adequate protection” may vary according to circumstances, but it is intended in general to protect the value of the secured creditor’s interest in the collateral and may include cash payments or the granting of additional security, if and at such time as the court in its discretion determines, for any diminution in the value of the collateral as a result of the stay of repossession or disposition or any use of the collateral by the debtor during the pendency of the bankruptcy case. In view of the broad discretionary powers of a bankruptcy court, it is impossible to predict how long payments under the Notes could be delayed following commencement of a bankruptcy case, whether or when the collateral agent would repossess or dispose of the collateral, and whether or to what extent holders of the Notes or holders or lenders under any other instruments or agreements governing pari passu obligations would be compensated for any delay in payment of loss of value of the collateral through the requirements of “adequate protection.” Furthermore, in the event the bankruptcy court determines that the value of the collateral is not sufficient to repay all amounts due on the Notes or other pari passu obligations, the holders of the Notes and holders of other pari passu obligations would have “undersecured claims” as to the difference. U.S. federal bankruptcy laws do not permit the payment or accrual of interest, costs and attorneys’ fees for “undersecured claims” during the debtor’s bankruptcy case. Additionally, the collateral agent’s ability to foreclose on the collateral on behalf of the holders of pari passu obligations may be subject to the consent of third parties, prior liens and practical problems associated with the realization of the trustee’s security interest in the collateral. Moreover, the debtor or trustee in a bankruptcy case may seek to void an alleged security interest in collateral for the benefit of the bankruptcy estate. It may successfully do so if the security interest is not properly perfected or was perfected within a specified period of time (generally 90 days) prior to the initiation of such proceeding. Under such circumstances, a creditor may hold no security interest and be treated as holding a general unsecured claim in the bankruptcy case. It is impossible to predict what recovery (if any) would be available for such an unsecured claim if the issuer or parent became a debtor in a bankruptcy case. While U.S. bankruptcy law generally invalidates provisions restricting a debtor’s ability to assume and/or assign a contract, there are exceptions to this rule which could be applicable in the event that the issuer or parent become subject to a U.S. bankruptcy proceeding.

There also can be no assurance that courts outside of the United States would recognize the U.S. bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction. Accordingly, difficulties may arise in administering a U.S. bankruptcy proceeding against the issuer or any of the guarantors with property located outside of the United States, and any orders or judgments of a bankruptcy court in the United States may not be enforceable in any foreign jurisdiction in which the issuer or any of the guarantors are organized. The rights of the collateral agent to enforce remedies may be significantly impaired by the restructuring or liquidation provisions of applicable jurisdictional bankruptcy laws, insolvency and other restructuring legislation if the benefit of such legislation is sought with respect to the issuer or parent. The risks outlined above regarding the difficulty of pursuing property that is collateral and that is located outside the United States is particularly relevant for parent, the issuer and the restricted subsidiaries since the drilling units that will serve as significant collateral for the Notes and guarantees and the other pari passu obligations is often, if not usually, outside the United States. Further, the holders of the Notes may receive in exchange for their claims a recovery that could be substantially less than the amounts of their claims (potentially even nothing), and any such recovery might consist of illiquid securities.

The Notes could be recharacterized by a bankruptcy court.

Recharacterization of a debt obligation to a capital contribution is an equitable remedy a bankruptcy court may direct if it determines that, upon an objection raised by a party in interest, a purported debt obligation is more properly characterized as a capital contribution. In making such a determination, bankruptcy courts consider, among other things, whether the parties intended to create a debt obligation and the nature of the instrument evidencing the obligation. Although the Company believes, and intends, the Notes to be a bona fide debt obligation, there can be no assurance a bankruptcy court would agree with the Company’s interpretation.

34

Table of Contents

The conversion rate will only be adjusted upon certain events.

The conversion rate of the Notes is only subject to adjustment upon certain events, including, share splits, dividends or reclassification with respect to the Ordinary Shares, certain other adjustments, and the payment of PIK interest and in certain cases of redemption or conversion of the Notes. The conversion rate will not be adjusted for any other events.

Any changes to the Ordinary Shares would affect holders of the Notes.

Holders of the Notes will not be entitled to any rights with respect to the Ordinary Shares (including, without limitation, voting rights and rights to participate in any dividends or other distributions on the Ordinary Shares), but holders of the Notes will be subject to all changes affecting the Ordinary Shares. Holders of the Notes will have rights with respect to the Ordinary Shares only upon conversion. For example, in the event an amendment is proposed to the Memorandum and Articles requiring shareholder approval and the record date for determining the shareholders of record entitled to vote on the amendment occurs prior to delivery of the Ordinary Shares, such holders will not be entitled to vote on the amendment, although they will, nevertheless, be subject to any changes in the powers, preferences, or rights of the Ordinary Shares.

The Notes may not be rated or may receive a lower rating than anticipated.

It is not expected that the Company will seek a rating on the Notes. If, however, one or more rating agencies rates the Notes and assigns them a rating lower than the rating expected by investors, or reduces its rating in the future, the market price of the Notes and/or the Ordinary Shares could be reduced.

Any future pledge of collateral might be avoidable in a subsequent bankruptcy.

Any future pledge of collateral in favor of the collateral agent, including pursuant to security documents delivered after the date of the Indenture, might be avoidable by the pledgor (as a subsequent debtor in possession) or by its trustee in bankruptcy if certain events or circumstances exist or occur, including, among others, if the pledgor is insolvent at the time of the pledge, the pledge permits the holders of the Notes to receive a greater recovery than if the pledge had not been given, and a bankruptcy proceeding in respect of the pledgor is commenced within 90 days following the pledge, or, in certain circumstances, a longer period.

There are circumstances other than repayment or discharge of the Notes under which the collateral securing the Notes and guarantees will be released automatically, without the holders’ consent or the consent of the trustee under the Indenture governing the Notes.

Under various circumstances, some of the collateral securing the Notes will be released automatically, including:

In addition, a guarantee will be automatically released in connection with a sale of such Guarantor or a sale of all or substantially all of the assets of that Guarantor, in each case, in a transaction not prohibited under the Indenture governing the Notes. The Indenture governing the Notes will also permit the board of directors of parent to designate one or more of our restricted subsidiaries that is a Guarantor of the Notes as an unrestricted subsidiary. If the board of directors of parent designates a subsidiary guarantor as an unrestricted subsidiary, all of the liens on any collateral owned by such subsidiary or any of its subsidiaries and any guarantees of the Notes by such subsidiary or any of its subsidiaries will be released under the Indenture governing the Notes. Designations of any unrestricted subsidiary will reduce the aggregate value of the collateral securing the Notes to the extent that liens on the assets of the unrestricted subsidiary and its subsidiaries are released. In addition, the creditors of the unrestricted subsidiary and its subsidiaries will have claims to the assets of the unrestricted subsidiary and its subsidiaries that are senior to any claims of the holders of Notes.

35

Table of Contents

Foreclosing on the collateral may be difficult.

Substantially all of the collateral is located outside of the United States. In particular, the Emerald Driller , Sapphire Driller , Topaz Driller , Aquamarine Driller , Platinum Explorer , Titanium Explorer , and Tungsten Explorer (together, the “Vessels”) are highly mobile and are, or may be, located in international waters outside the jurisdiction of any court. Even when such collateral is within the jurisdiction of a court, such jurisdiction may not have effective or favorable foreclosure procedures and lien priorities, particularly if such collateral is routinely in transit. Any foreclosure proceedings could be subject to lengthy delays resulting in increased custodial costs, deterioration in the condition of the collateral, and substantial reduction of the value of such collateral. In addition, some jurisdictions may not provide a legal remedy for the enforcement of mortgages on the collateral.

The Vessels operate worldwide and the respective laws of each jurisdiction where a Vessel is actually located at the time the collateral agent may seek to enforce the ship mortgage will govern the foreclosure proceedings and distribution of proceeds. Such laws may vary significantly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Furthermore, all or some of those laws and procedures may be less favorable to mortgagees than those in other jurisdictions and may be less favorable than those applicable in the United States. The costs of enforcement in foreign jurisdictions, particularly if proceedings are ongoing simultaneously against the Vessels in different jurisdictions, can be high and can include fees based on the face amount of the mortgage(s) being enforced. Foreign court proceedings can also be slow and have unexpected procedural hurdles. Priorities accorded maritime lien claims and ship mortgages can vary in foreign jurisdictions, and some jurisdictions prefer certain local claimants (such as local suppliers of operating necessaries) to foreign claimants, such as the collateral agent or mortgagee. Consequently there are no assurances that the collateral agent will be able to enforce any one or more of the ship mortgages covering vessels that are located outside the United States.

Maritime liens may arise and take priority over the liens securing the Notes.

The laws of the various jurisdictions in which the Vessels may operate may give rise to the existence of maritime liens, which may take priority over the ship mortgages. Such liens may arise in support of, among other things, claims by unpaid ship repairers remaining in possession of such collateral, claims for salvage, claims for damage caused by a collision, claims for seamen’s wages and other employment benefits and claims for pilotage, as well as potential claims for necessary goods and services supplied to such collateral. This list should not be regarded as definitive or exhaustive, as the categories of claims giving rise to maritime liens, and the ranking of such liens, vary from one jurisdiction to another. Maritime liens can attach without any court action, notice, registration, or documentation and accordingly their existence cannot necessarily be identified.

U.S. federal, state and foreign fraudulent transfer laws may permit a court to void the Notes and the guarantees, subordinate claims in respect of the Notes and the guarantees and require holders of the Notes to return payments received. If this occurs, holders of the Notes may not receive any payments on the Notes.

U.S. federal, state and foreign fraudulent transfer and conveyance statutes may apply to the issuance of the Notes and the incurrence of any guarantees. Under U.S. federal bankruptcy law and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer or conveyance laws, which may vary from state to state and be different from other applicable foreign jurisdictions, the Notes or guarantees could be voided as a fraudulent transfer or conveyance if (1) the issuer or any of the guarantors, as applicable, issued the Notes or incurred the guarantees with the intent of hindering, delaying or defrauding creditors or (2) the issuer or any of the guarantors, as applicable, received less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration in return for either issuing the Notes or incurring the guarantees and, in the case of (2) only, one of the following is also true at the time thereof:

36

Table of Contents

A court would likely find that the issuer or a guarantor did not receive reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration for the Notes or such guarantee if the issuer or such guarantor did not substantially benefit directly or indirectly from the issuance of the Notes or the applicable guarantee. As a general matter, value is given for a transfer or an obligation if, in exchange for the transfer or obligation, property is transferred or an antecedent debt is secured or satisfied. A debtor will generally not be considered to have received value in connection with a debt offering if the debtor uses the proceeds of that offering to make a dividend payment or otherwise retire or redeem equity securities issued by the debtor.

The issuer cannot be certain as to the standards a court would use to determine whether or not it or the guarantors were solvent at the relevant time or, regardless of the standard that a court uses, that the issuance of the guarantees would not be further subordinated to the other debt of the issuer or of the guarantors. Generally, however, an entity would be considered insolvent if, at the time it incurred indebtedness:

If a court were to find that the issuance of the Notes or the incurrence of the guarantee was a fraudulent transfer or conveyance, the court could void the payment obligations under the Notes or such guarantee or further subordinate the Notes or such guarantee to presently existing and future indebtedness of the issuer or of the related guarantor, or require the holders of the Notes to repay any amounts received with respect to such guarantee. In the event of a finding that a fraudulent transfer or conveyance occurred, holders of the Notes may not receive any repayment on the Notes. Further, the voidance of the Notes could result in an event of default with respect to other debt of parent and its subsidiaries that could result in acceleration of such debt.

Although each guarantee entered into by a guarantor will contain a provision intended to limit that guarantor’s liability to the maximum amount that it could incur without causing the incurrence of obligations under its guarantee to be a fraudulent transfer, this provision may not be effective to protect those guarantees from being voided under fraudulent transfer law, or may reduce that guarantor’s obligation to an amount that effectively makes its guarantee worthless.

In addition, different or additional fraudulent conveyance laws may exist in foreign jurisdictions which could result in the liens being avoided.

If the guarantees by the subsidiary guarantors are not enforceable, the Notes would be effectively subordinated to all liabilities of the subsidiary guarantors, including trade payables.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Characterization of the Stapled Securities

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the Company will treat the Stapled Securities as a single, indivisible investment constituting equity in the Company. However, it is possible that the Notes could be treated as a separate debt instrument of the Company for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Pursuant to our Plan of Reorganization, certain holders of debt issued by the Company before its Chapter 11 restructuring received Stapled Securities, among other things, in exchange for such debt. If the Notes were characterized as a separate debt instrument and were deemed to be (or were treated as having been exchanged for other debt that was deemed to be) traded on an established securities market, a U.S. Holder (as defined below) might be required to accrue significant amounts of original issue discount (“OID”) in respect of the Notes.

For a discussion of these considerations, see “Taxation—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations.”

37

Table of Contents