UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-13926
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 76-0321760 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
15415 Katy Freeway
Houston, Texas
77094
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(281) 492-5300
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | þ | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
As of July 27, 2016 |
Common stock, $ | 0.01 par value per share | 137,169,663 shares |
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2016
PAGE NO. | ||||
1 | ||||
2 | ||||
3 | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
7 | ||||
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
22 | |||
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
35 | |||
35 | ||||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
37 |
2
ITEM 1. | Financial Statements. |
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
June 30,
2016 |
December 31,
2015 |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets : |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 103,279 | $ | 119,028 | ||||
Marketable securities |
57 | 11,518 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for bad debts |
324,588 | 405,370 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
112,293 | 119,479 | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
6,200 | 14,200 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
546,417 | 669,595 | ||||||
Drilling and other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
5,848,172 | 6,378,814 | ||||||
Other assets |
110,689 | 101,485 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 6,505,278 | $ | 7,149,894 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 35,567 | $ | 70,272 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
204,497 | 253,769 | ||||||
Taxes payable |
60,624 | 15,093 | ||||||
Short-term borrowings |
327,300 | 286,589 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
627,988 | 625,723 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
1,980,324 | 1,979,778 | ||||||
Deferred tax liability |
114,384 | 276,529 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
164,505 | 155,094 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
2,887,201 | 3,037,124 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 10) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock (par value $0.01, 25,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding) |
| | ||||||
Common stock (par value $0.01, 500,000,000 shares authorized; 143,997,757 shares issued and 137,169,663 shares outstanding at June 30, 2016; 143,978,877 shares issued and 137,158,706 shares outstanding at December 31, 2015) |
1,440 | 1,440 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
2,002,463 | 1,999,634 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
1,816,756 | 2,319,136 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss) |
4 | (5,035 | ) | |||||
Treasury stock, at cost (6,828,094 and 6,820,171 shares of common stock at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively) |
(202,586 | ) | (202,405 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders equity |
3,618,077 | 4,112,770 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 6,505,278 | $ | 7,149,894 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended
June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Contract drilling |
$ | 357,409 | $ | 617,442 | $ | 800,932 | $ | 1,217,019 | ||||||||
Revenues related to reimbursable expenses |
31,338 | 16,590 | 58,358 | 37,069 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
388,747 | 634,032 | 859,290 | 1,254,088 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Contract drilling, excluding depreciation |
198,336 | 342,869 | 411,177 | 693,527 | ||||||||||||
Reimbursable expenses |
16,527 | 16,336 | 43,318 | 36,428 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
105,016 | 123,329 | 209,256 | 260,628 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
18,139 | 16,548 | 33,537 | 34,000 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of assets |
678,145 | | 678,145 | 358,528 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and separation costs |
| 993 | | 7,161 | ||||||||||||
Gain on disposition of assets |
(747 | ) | (164 | ) | (1,043 | ) | (775 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
1,015,416 | 499,911 | 1,374,390 | 1,389,497 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(626,669 | ) | 134,121 | (515,100 | ) | (135,409 | ) | |||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
269 | 584 | 442 | 1,167 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(24,156 | ) | (25,468 | ) | (49,672 | ) | (49,450 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign currency transaction (loss) gain |
(3,513 | ) | (3,473 | ) | (7,121 | ) | 2,117 | |||||||||
Other, net |
(12,046 | ) | 264 | (11,468 | ) | 485 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Loss) income before income tax benefit (expense ) |
(666,115 | ) | 106,028 | (582,919 | ) | (181,090 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
76,178 | (15,642 | ) | 80,407 | 15,767 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (589,937 | ) | $ | 90,386 | $ | (502,512 | ) | $ | (165,323 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Loss) earnings per share, Basic and Diluted |
$ | (4.30 | ) | $ | 0.66 | $ | (3.66 | ) | $ | (1.21 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted-average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Shares of common stock |
137,170 | 137,159 | 137,166 | 137,155 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive potential shares of common stock |
| 42 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total weighted-average shares outstanding |
137,170 | 137,201 | 137,166 | 137,155 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share of common stock |
$ | | $ | 0.125 | $ | | $ | 0.25 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended
June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (589,937 | ) | $ | 90,386 | $ | (502,512 | ) | $ | (165,323 | ) | |||||
Other comprehensive gains (losses), net of tax : |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative financial instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gain (loss) |
| 293 | | (1,534 | ) | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss included in net (loss) income |
(2 | ) | 1,230 | (3 | ) | 4,817 | ||||||||||
Investments in marketable securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gain (loss) |
1 | 1,830 | (6,558 | ) | (293 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for loss included in net (loss) income |
11,600 | | 11,600 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total other comprehensive gain |
11,599 | 3,353 | 5,039 | 2,990 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income |
$ | (578,338 | ) | $ | 93,739 | $ | (497,473 | ) | $ | (162,333 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
5
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
Operating activities: |
|
|||||||
Net loss |
$ | (502,512 | ) | $ | (165,323 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|||||||
Depreciation |
209,256 | 260,628 | ||||||
Loss on impairment of assets |
678,145 | 358,528 | ||||||
Gain on disposition of assets |
(1,043 | ) | (775 | ) | ||||
Loss on sale of marketable securities, net |
12,146 | | ||||||
Loss on foreign currency forward exchange contracts |
| 7,924 | ||||||
Deferred tax provision |
(162,531 | ) | (124,353 | ) | ||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
2,829 | 2,186 | ||||||
Deferred income, net |
(16,363 | ) | (13,244 | ) | ||||
Deferred expenses, net |
4,751 | (47,630 | ) | |||||
Other assets, noncurrent |
(900 | ) | 867 | |||||
Other liabilities, noncurrent |
4,189 | (990 | ) | |||||
Payments for settlement of foreign currency forward exchange contracts designated as accounting hedges |
| (7,924 | ) | |||||
Bank deposits denominated in nonconvertible currencies |
725 | 795 | ||||||
Other |
759 | 1,186 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|||||||
Accounts receivable |
80,782 | (51,751 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
2,281 | 6,404 | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(59,788 | ) | (90,883 | ) | ||||
Taxes payable |
52,744 | 65,199 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
305,470 | 200,844 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures (including rig construction) |
(533,412 | ) | (686,111 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposition of assets, net of disposal costs |
167,298 | 7,652 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale and maturities of marketable securities |
4,592 | 23 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(361,522 | ) | (678,436 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Net proceeds from short-term borrowings |
40,711 | 374,978 | ||||||
Payment of dividends and anti-dilution payments |
(408 | ) | (35,143 | ) | ||||
Other |
| (12 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
40,303 | 339,823 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net change in cash and cash equivalents |
(15,749 | ) | (137,769 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
119,028 | 233,623 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 103,279 | $ | 95,854 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
6
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. General Information
The unaudited consolidated financial statements of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. and subsidiaries, which we refer to as Diamond Offshore, we, us or our, should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (File No. 1-13926).
As of July 27, 2016, Loews Corporation owned approximately 53% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.
Interim Financial Information
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S., or GAAP, for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Accordingly, pursuant to such rules and regulations, they do not include all disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The consolidated financial information has not been audited but, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of Diamond Offshores consolidated balance sheets, statements of operations, statements of comprehensive income and statements of cash flows at the dates and for the periods indicated. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results of operations for the respective full years.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimated.
Assets Held For Sale
At December 31, 2015, we reported the $14.2 million carrying value of five marketed-for-sale jack-up rigs as Assets held for sale in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. One of these rigs was sold for $8.0 million in February 2016. The $6.2 million aggregate carrying value of the four remaining marketed-for-sale jack-up rigs is reported as Assets held for sale in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2016.
Drilling and Other Property and Equipment
We carry our drilling and other property and equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and routine repairs are charged to income currently while replacements and betterments that upgrade or increase the functionality of our existing equipment and that significantly extend the useful life of an existing asset are capitalized. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015, we capitalized $63.0 million and $262.4 million, respectively, in replacements and betterments of our drilling fleet. See Notes 2 and 8.
Capitalized Interest
We capitalize interest cost for qualifying construction and upgrade projects. See Note 8. A reconciliation of our total interest cost to Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized as reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations is as follows:
Three Months Ended
June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Total interest cost, including amortization of debt issuance costs |
$ | 28,046 | $ | 30,428 | $ | 56,871 | $ | 60,424 | ||||||||
Capitalized interest |
(3,890 | ) | (4,960 | ) | (7,199 | ) | (10,974 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total interest expense as reported |
$ | 24,156 | $ | 25,468 | $ | 49,672 | $ | 49,450 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We evaluate our property and equipment for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable (such as, but not limited to, cold stacking a rig, the expectation of cold stacking a rig in the near term, contracted backlog of less than one year for a rig, a decision to retire or scrap a rig, or excess spending over budget on a newbuild, construction project or major rig upgrade). We utilize an undiscounted probability-weighted cash flow analysis in testing an asset for potential impairment. Our assumptions and estimates underlying this analysis include the following:
| dayrate by rig; |
| utilization rate by rig if active, warm stacked or cold stacked (expressed as the actual percentage of time per year that the rig would be used at certain dayrates); |
| the per day operating cost for each rig if active, warm stacked or cold stacked; |
| the estimated annual cost for rig replacements and/or enhancement programs; |
| the estimated maintenance, inspection or other reactivation costs associated with a rig returning to work; |
| salvage value for each rig; and |
| estimated proceeds that may be received on disposition of each rig. |
Based on these assumptions, we develop a matrix for each rig under evaluation using multiple utilization/dayrate scenarios, to each of which we have assigned a probability of occurrence. We arrive at a projected probability-weighted cash flow for each rig based on the respective matrix and compare such amount to the carrying value of the asset to assess recoverability.
The underlying assumptions and assigned probabilities of occurrence for utilization and dayrate scenarios are developed using a methodology that examines historical data for each rig, which considers the rigs age, rated water depth and other attributes, and then assesses the rigs future marketability in light of the current and projected market environment at the time of assessment. Other assumptions, such as operating, maintenance, inspection and reactivation costs, are estimated using historical data adjusted for known developments, cost projections for re-entry of rigs into the market and future events that are anticipated by management at the time of the assessment.
Managements assumptions are necessarily subjective and are an inherent part of our asset impairment evaluation, and the use of different assumptions could produce results that differ from those reported. Our methodology generally involves the use of significant unobservable inputs, representative of a Level 3 fair value measurement, which may include assumptions related to future dayrate revenue, costs and rig utilization, quotes from rig brokers, the long-term future performance of our rigs and future market conditions. Managements assumptions involve uncertainties about future demand for our services, dayrates, expenses and other future events, and managements expectations may not be indicative of future outcomes. Significant unanticipated changes to these assumptions could materially alter our analysis in testing an asset for potential impairment. For example, changes in market conditions that exist at the measurement date or that are projected by management could affect our key assumptions. Other events or circumstances that could affect our assumptions may include, but are not limited to, a further sustained decline in oil and gas prices, cancelations of our drilling contracts or contracts of our competitors, contract modifications, costs to comply with new governmental regulations, growth in the global oversupply of oil and geopolitical events, such as lifting sanctions on oil-producing nations. Should actual market conditions in the future vary significantly from market conditions used in our projections, our assessment of impairment would likely be different. See Note 2.
8
Debt Issuance Costs
Historically, we have presented deferred costs associated with the issuance of long-term debt as Other Assets in our unaudited consolidated balance sheets and have amortized such costs over the respective terms of the related debt. In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2015-03, InterestImputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30); Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs , or ASU 2015-03, which requires debt issuance costs associated with our senior notes to be presented in the balance sheet as a reduction in the related long-term debt. We have adopted the provisions of ASU 2015-03 effective January 1, 2016 and have retrospectively applied its provisions to all periods presented in our Consolidated Financial Statements. The retrospective effect of our adoption of ASU 2015-03, which affected only the presentation of deferred debt issuance costs in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015, is as follows:
Other Assets |
Long-term
Debt |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Amount as previously presented, before adoption of ASU 2015-03 |
$ | 116,480 | $ | 1,994,773 | ||||
Deferred debt issuance costs |
(14,995 | ) | (14,995 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Amount as restated, after adoption of ASU 2015-03 |
$ | 101,485 | $ | 1,979,778 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, CompensationStock Compensation (Topic 718) , or ASU 2016-09, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions. The new guidance makes several modifications to the accounting for forfeitures, employer tax withholding on share-based compensation and the financial statement presentation of excess tax benefits or deficiencies. In addition, ASU 2016-09 clarifies the statement of cash flows presentation for certain components of share-based awards. The guidance of ASU 2016-09 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Earlier adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the provisions of ASU 2016-09 and have not yet determined the impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) , or ASU 2014-09. The new standard supersedes the industry-specific standards that currently exist under GAAP and provides a framework to address revenue recognition issues comprehensively for all contracts with customers regardless of industry-specific or transaction-specific fact patterns. Under the new guidance, companies recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized and requires enhanced disclosures about revenue. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09. The guidance of ASU 2014-09 is now effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, and may be adopted using a retrospective or modified retrospective approach.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) , or ASU 2016-02, which requires an entity to separate the lease components from the nonlease components in a contract. The lease components are to be accounted for under ASU 2016-02, which, under the guidance, may require recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for most leases and derecognition of the leased asset and recognition of a net investment in the lease by the lessor. ASU 2016-02 also provides for additional disclosure requirements for both lessees and lessors. Nonlease components would be accounted for under ASU 2014-09. The guidance of ASU 2016-02 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption of ASU 2016-02 is permitted.
We are evaluating the provisions of ASU 2016-02 concurrently with the provisions of ASU 2014-09. We have not yet determined the impact of these ASUs on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
2. Asset Impairments
2016 Impairments - During the second quarter of 2016, in response to the continuing decline in industry-wide utilization for semisubmersible rigs, further exacerbated by additional and more frequent contract cancelations by customers, declining dayrates, as well as the output of a third-party strategic review of our long-term business plan completed in the second quarter of 2016, we reassessed our projections for a recovery in the offshore drilling market. As a result, we concluded that an expected market recovery is now likely further in the future than had
9
previously been estimated. Consequently, we believe our cold-stacked rigs, as well as those rigs that we expect to cold stack in the near term after they come off contract, will likely remain cold stacked for an extended period of time. We also believe that the re-entry costs for these rigs will be higher than previously estimated, negatively impacting the undiscounted, projected probability-weighted cash flow projections utilized in our impairment analysis. In addition, in response to the declining market, we have also reduced anticipated market pricing and expected utilization of these rigs after reactivation.
In the second quarter of 2016, we evaluated 15 of our drilling rigs with indications that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Based on our updated assumptions and analyses, we determined that the carrying values of eight of these rigs, consisting of three ultra-deepwater, three deepwater and two mid-water semisubmersible rigs, were impaired (we collectively refer to these eight rigs as the 2016 Impaired Rigs).
We estimated the fair value of the 2016 Impaired Rigs using an income approach. The fair value of each rig was estimated based on a calculation of the rigs discounted future net cash flows over its remaining economic life, which utilized significant unobservable inputs, including, but not limited to, assumptions related to estimated dayrate revenue, rig utilization, estimated reactivation and regulatory survey costs, as well as estimated proceeds that may be received on ultimate disposition of the rig. Our fair value estimates were representative of Level 3 fair value measurements due to the significant level of estimation involved and the lack of transparency as to the inputs used. During the second quarter of 2016, we recorded an impairment loss of $670.0 million related to our 2016 Impaired Rigs
As of June 30, 2016, there were seven rigs in our drilling fleet for which there were no indications that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable and, thus, were not evaluated for impairment at that time. If market fundamentals in the offshore oil and gas industry deteriorate further, we may be required to recognize additional impairment losses in future periods.
2015 Impairments - During the first quarter of 2015, we evaluated 17 of our drilling rigs with indications that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Using an undiscounted, projected probability-weighted cash flow analysis, we determined that the carrying value of eight of these rigs, consisting of seven mid-water floaters and our older 7,875-foot water depth rated drillship, were impaired (we collectively refer to these eight rigs as the 1st Quarter 2015 Impaired Rigs).
We estimated the fair value of five of the 1st Quarter 2015 Impaired Rigs that were cold stacked utilizing a market approach, which required us to estimate the value that would be received for each rig in the principal or most advantageous market for that rig in an orderly transaction between market participants. Such estimates were based on various inputs, including historical contracted sales prices for similar rigs in our fleet, nonbinding quotes from rig brokers and/or indicative bids. We estimated the fair value of the three remaining 1st Quarter 2015 Impaired Rigs using an income approach, as discussed above. Our fair value estimates were representative of Level 3 fair value measurements due to the significant level of estimation involved and the lack of transparency as to the inputs used.
We recognized an impairment loss aggregating $358.5 million during the first quarter of 2015 to write down these rigs to their estimated recoverable amounts. Subsequent to the first quarter of 2015, we evaluated an additional eight drilling rigs, as well those rigs initially evaluated in the first quarter of 2015 that we had determined not to be impaired, for impairment. As a result of these evaluations, we determined that the carrying value of an additional nine drilling rigs, consisting of one ultra-deepwater, one deepwater and two mid-water semisubmersible rigs and five jack-up rigs, was not recoverable and recorded additional impairment losses of $2.6 million and $499.4 million in the third and fourth quarters of 2015, respectively.
Of the 17 rigs impaired during 2015, six mid-water semisubmersible rigs, our older drillship and one marketed-for-sale jack-up rig have been sold. At June 30, 2016, 14 of the remaining rigs impaired during 2015 and 2016 were cold stacked, including four jack-up rigs that are marketed for sale. Two of the 2016 Impaired Rigs are currently contracted by customers. Subsequent to June 30, 2016, our management announced a plan to sell two of the cold-stacked 2016 Impaired Rigs for scrap value.
10
3. Supplemental Financial Information
Consolidated Balance Sheets Information
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for bad debts, consist of the following:
June 30,
2016 |
December 31,
2015 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Trade receivables |
$ | 308,695 | $ | 390,429 | ||||
Value added tax receivables |
18,322 | 14,475 | ||||||
Amounts held in escrow |
2,293 | 4,966 | ||||||
Related party receivables |
212 | 167 | ||||||
Other |
790 | 1,057 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
330,312 | 411,094 | |||||||
Allowance for bad debts |
(5,724 | ) | (5,724 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 324,588 | $ | 405,370 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets consist of the following:
June 30,
2016 |
December 31,
2015 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Rig spare parts and supplies |
$ | 28,153 | $ | 42,804 | ||||
Deferred mobilization costs |
51,589 | 52,965 | ||||||
Prepaid insurance |
5,838 | 4,483 | ||||||
Prepaid taxes |
19,301 | 14,969 | ||||||
Other |
7,412 | 4,258 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 112,293 | $ | 119,479 | ||||
|
|
|
|
During the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, we recognized an $8.1 million impairment loss related to our rig spare parts and supplies.
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
June 30,
2016 |
December 31,
2015 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Rig operating expenses |
$ | 38,871 | $ | 47,426 | ||||
Payroll and benefits |
41,708 | 59,787 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
21,418 | 31,542 | ||||||
Accrued capital project/upgrade costs |
70,800 | 84,146 | ||||||
Interest payable |
18,365 | 18,365 | ||||||
Personal injury and other claims |
6,174 | 8,320 | ||||||
Other |
7,161 | 4,183 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 204,497 | $ | 253,769 | ||||
|
|
|
|
11
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Information
Noncash investing activities excluded from the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and other supplemental cash flow information is as follows:
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Accrued but unpaid capital expenditures at period end |
$ | 70,800 | $ | 27,721 | ||||
Common stock withheld for payroll tax obligations (1) |
181 | 236 | ||||||
Cash interest payments (2) |
52,491 | 51,531 | ||||||
Cash income taxes paid, net of (refunds): |
||||||||
U.S. federal |
| (3,344 | ) | |||||
Foreign |
33,485 | 46,181 | ||||||
State |
1 | 150 |
(1) | Represents the cost of 7,923 shares and 7,810 shares of common stock withheld to satisfy payroll tax obligations incurred as a result of the vesting of restricted stock units in the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These costs are presented as a deduction from stockholders equity in Treasury stock in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2016 and 2015. |
(2) | Interest payments, net of amounts capitalized, were $45.6 million and $42.1 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. |
4. Earnings Per Share
A reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of our basic and diluted per-share computations follows:
Three Months Ended
June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income basic and diluted numerator |
$ | (589,937 | ) | $ | 90,386 | $ | (502,512 | ) | $ | (165,323 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average shares basic (denominator): |
137,170 | 137,159 | 137,166 | 137,155 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock-based awards |
| 42 | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Weighted average shares including conversions diluted (denominator) |
137,170 | 137,201 | 137,166 | 137,155 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Loss) earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (4.30 | ) | $ | 0.66 | $ | (3.66 | ) | $ | (1.21 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
$ | (4.30 | ) | $ | 0.66 | $ | (3.66 | ) | $ | (1.21 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the share effects of stock-based awards excluded from our computations of diluted earnings per share, or EPS, as the inclusion of such potentially dilutive shares would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented:
Three Months Ended
June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Employee and director: |
||||||||||||||||
Stock options |
8 | 30 | 8 | 32 | ||||||||||||
Stock appreciation rights |
1,536 | 1,557 | 1,536 | 1,573 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock units |
739 | 37 | 658 | 200 |
5. Marketable Securities
We report our investments as current assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets in Marketable securities, representing the investment of cash available for current operations. See Note 7.
12
Our investments in marketable securities are classified as available for sale and are summarized as follows:
June 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost |
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) |
Market
Value |
||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
$ | 56 | $ | 1 | $ | 57 |
December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||
Amortized
Cost |
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) |
Market
Value |
||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
$ | 16,480 | $ | (5,042 | ) | $ | 11,438 | |||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
77 | 3 | 80 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 16,557 | $ | (5,039 | ) | $ | 11,518 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2016, we sold our investment in corporate bonds for proceeds of $4.6 million and recognized a loss of $12.9 million, including $0.8 million in accrued interest, which we do not expect to collect.
Proceeds from maturities and sales of mortgage-backed securities and the related gains and losses during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were not significant.
6. Derivative Financial Instruments
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts
During the six months ended June 30, 2015, we settled foreign currency forward exchange, or FOREX, contracts with aggregate notional values of approximately $88.8 million, of which the entire aggregate amount was designated as a cash flow accounting hedge. We did not settle any FOREX contracts during the six months ended June 30, 2016 and had no FOREX contracts outstanding at June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.
During the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, we recognized aggregate losses of $1.5 million and $7.9 million, respectively, related to our FOREX contracts designated as accounting hedges. We have presented these amounts within Contract drilling expense, excluding depreciation in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table presents the amounts recognized in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations related to our derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015. In the table, AOCGL refers to accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss).
Period Ended June 30, 2015 | ||||||||
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
FOREX contracts: |
||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in AOCGL on derivative (effective portion) |
$ | 451 | $ | (2,359 | ) | |||
Location of (loss) gain reclassified from AOCGL into income (effective portion) |
|
Contract drilling
expense |
|
|
Contract drilling
expense |
|
||
Amount of (loss) gain reclassified from AOCGL into income (effective portion) |
$ | (1,894 | ) | $ | (7,414 | ) | ||
Location of loss recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) |
|
Foreign currency
transaction gain (loss) |
|
|
Foreign currency
transaction gain (loss) |
|
||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income on derivative (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing) |
$ | 8 | $ | (1 | ) |
13
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, we did not reclassify any amounts from AOCGL due to the probability of an underlying forecasted transaction not occurring.
7. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Disclosures
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit or market risk consist primarily of periodic temporary investments of excess cash, trade accounts receivable and investments in debt securities, including residential mortgage-backed securities. We generally place our excess cash investments in U.S. government-backed short-term money market instruments through several financial institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the insurable limit. We periodically evaluate the relative credit standing of these financial institutions as part of our investment strategy.
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to our trade accounts receivable are limited primarily due to the entities comprising our customer base. Since the market for our services is the offshore oil and gas industry, this customer base has consisted primarily of major and independent oil and gas companies and government-owned oil companies. Based on our current customer base and the geographic areas in which we operate, as well as the number of rigs currently working in a geographic area, we do not believe that we have any significant concentrations of credit risk at June 30, 2016.
In general, before working for a customer with whom we have not had a prior business relationship and/or whose financial stability may be uncertain to us, we perform a credit review on that company. Based on that analysis, we may require that the customer present a letter of credit, prepay or provide other credit enhancements. We record a provision for bad debts on a case-by-case basis when facts and circumstances indicate that a customer receivable may not be collectible and, historically, losses on our trade receivables have been infrequent occurrences.
Fair Values
Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The fair value hierarchy prescribed by GAAP requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 | Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. Level 1 assets include short-term investments such as money market funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and Treasury notes. Our Level 1 assets at June 30, 2016 consisted of cash held in money market funds of $69.3 million and time deposits of $20.4 million. Our Level 1 assets at December 31, 2015 consisted of cash held in money market funds of $85.2 million and time deposits of $20.4 million. | |
Level 2 | Quoted market prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. Level 2 assets and liabilities include residential mortgage-backed securities, corporate bonds purchased in a private placement offering and over-the-counter FOREX contracts. Our residential mortgage-backed securities and corporate bonds, prior to being sold in the second quarter of 2016, were valued using a model-derived valuation technique based on the quoted closing market prices received from a financial institution. The inputs used in our valuation are obtained from a Bloomberg curve analysis which uses par coupon swap rates to calculate implied forward rates so that projected floating rate cash flows can be calculated. The valuation techniques underlying the models are widely accepted in the financial services industry and do not involve significant judgment. | |
Level 3 | Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable. Level 3 assets and liabilities generally include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation or for which there is a lack of transparency as to the inputs used. Our Level 3 assets at June 30, 2016 consisted of nonrecurring measurements of certain of our drilling rigs and associated spare parts and supplies for which we recorded an impairment loss during the second quarter of 2016 and in 2015. See Notes 1, 2 and 3. |
14
Market conditions could cause an instrument to be reclassified among Levels 1, 2 and 3. Our policy regarding fair value measurements of financial instruments transferred into and out of levels is to reflect the transfers as having occurred at the beginning of the reporting period. There were no transfers between fair value levels during the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.
Certain of our assets and liabilities are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with GAAP. In addition, certain assets and liabilities may be recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Generally, we record assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as a result of impairment charges. We recorded impairment charges related to certain of our drilling rigs and related rig spare parts and supplies, which were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015, September 30, 2015, December 31, 2015 and June 30, 2016 of $358.5 million, $2.6 million, $499.4 million and $678.1 million, respectively.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are summarized below:
June 30, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
Assets at
Fair Value |
Total Losses
for Six Months Ended (1) |
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring fair value measurements: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | 89,760 | $ | | $ | | $ | 89,760 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
| 57 | | 57 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 89,760 | $ | 57 | $ | | $ | 89,817 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Nonrecurring fair value measurements: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired assets (2)(3) |
$ | | $ | | $ | 94,805 | $ | 94,805 | $ | 678,145 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Represents impairment losses of $8.1 million and $670.0 million recognized during the three-month period ended June 30, 2016 related to our rig spare parts and supplies and the 2016 Impaired Rigs, respectively. See Notes 2 and 3. |
(2) | Represents the total book value as of June 30, 2016 of $69.0 million for 16 drilling rigs, which were written down to their estimated recoverable amounts in 2015 and 2016, and $25.8 million for rig spare parts and supplies, which were written down to their estimated recoverable amounts in the second quarter of 2016. Of the total fair value, $25.8 million, $6.2 million and $62.8 million were reported as Prepaid expenses and other current assets, Assets held for sale and Drilling and other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, 2016. See Notes 1, 2 and 3. |
(3) | Excludes the fair value of one marketed-for-sale jack-up rig and two mid-water semisubmersible rigs sold during the first six months of 2016. |
15
December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
Assets at
Fair Value |
Total Losses
for Year Ended (1) |
||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recurring fair value measurements: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
$ | 105,659 | $ | | $ | | $ | 105,659 | ||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
| 11,438 | | 11,438 | ||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
| 80 | | 80 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 105,659 | 11,518 | $ | | $ | 117,177 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Nonrecurring fair value measurements: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Impaired assets (2)(3) |
$ | | $ | | $ | 189,600 | $ | 189,600 | $ | 860,441 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Represents the aggregate impairment loss recognized for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to our rigs impaired during 2015. |
(2) | Represents the book value of our rigs impaired during 2015, which were written down to their estimated recoverable amounts during 2015, of which $14.2 million and $175.4 million were reported as Assets held for sale and Drilling and other property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2015. |
(3) | Excludes five rigs with an aggregate fair value of $2.4 million, which were impaired in 2015, but were subsequently sold for scrap prior to December 31, 2015. |
We believe that the carrying amounts of our other financial assets and liabilities (excluding long-term debt), which are not measured at fair value in our Consolidated Balance Sheets, approximate fair value based on the following assumptions:
| Cash and cash equivalents The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. |
| Accounts receivable and accounts payable The carrying amounts approximate fair value based on the nature of the instruments. |
| Short-term borrowings The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. |
We consider our senior notes to be Level 2 liabilities under the GAAP fair value hierarchy and, accordingly, the fair value of our senior notes was derived using a third-party pricing service at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. We perform control procedures over information we obtain from pricing services and brokers to test whether prices received represent a reasonable estimate of fair value. These procedures include the review of pricing service or broker pricing methodologies and comparing fair value estimates to actual trade activity executed in the market for these instruments occurring generally within a 10-day period of the report date. Fair values and related carrying values of our senior notes are shown below.
June 30, 2016 | December 31, 2015 | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | |||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||
5.875% Senior Notes due 2019 |
$ | 513.1 | $ | 499.7 | $ | 506.8 | $ | 499.7 | ||||||||
3.45% Senior Notes due 2023 |
208.9 | 249.2 | 208.0 | 249.2 | ||||||||||||
5.70% Senior Notes due 2039 |
378.8 | 497.1 | 360.0 | 497.0 | ||||||||||||
4.875% Senior Notes due 2043 |
534.4 | 748.9 | 455.3 | 748.9 |
We have estimated the fair value amounts by using appropriate valuation methodologies and information available to management. Considerable judgment is required in developing these estimates, and accordingly, no assurance can be given that the estimated values are indicative of the amounts that would be realized in a free market exchange.
16
8. Drilling and Other Property and Equipment
Cost and accumulated depreciation of drilling and other property and equipment are summarized as follows:
June 30,
2016 |
December 31,
2015 |
|||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Drilling rigs and equipment |
$ | 8,428,592 | $ | 9,345,484 | ||||
Construction work-in-progress |
716,342 | 269,605 | ||||||
Land and buildings |
64,962 | 64,775 | ||||||
Office equipment and other |
72,020 | 71,537 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cost |
9,281,916 | 9,751,401 | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(3,433,744 | ) | (3,372,587 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Drilling and other property and equipment, net |
$ | 5,848,172 | $ | 6,378,814 | ||||
|
|
|
|
During the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2016, we recognized an aggregate impairment loss of $670.0 million related to the 2016 Impaired Rigs. See Notes 1 and 2.
See Note 13 for a discussion of three sale and leaseback transactions that were executed during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016.
Construction work-in-progress, including capitalized interest, at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $716.3 million and $269.6 million, respectively, attributable to the Ocean GreatWhite , a 10,000 foot dynamically positioned, harsh environment semisubmersible drilling rig, which was delivered by Hyundai Heavy Industries Co., Ltd., or HHI, in July 2016. We expect to place the rig in service in the third quarter of 2016 after completion of a rig enhancement project.
9. Credit Agreement, Commercial Paper and Credit Ratings
In February 2016, Moodys Investors Service, or Moodys, downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating to Ba2 from Baa2, with a stable outlook, and also downgraded our short-term credit rating to sub-prime. In July 2016, S&P Global Ratings (formerly Standard & Poors Ratings Services) downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating to BBB from BBB+; the outlook remains negative.
As a result of the Moodys downgrade, we canceled our commercial paper program due to our inability to access the commercial paper market in the foreseeable future and no longer obtain a short-term credit rating from either rating agency. In addition, based on our current credit ratings, the applicable interest rate for alternate base rate loans under our revolving credit agreement is 0.25% over the greater of (i) the prime rate, (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% and (iii) the daily one-month Eurodollar Rate plus 1.00%. The applicable interest rate for Eurodollar loans under our revolving credit agreement is currently 1.25% over British Bankers Association LIBOR. The applicable commitment fee is 0.20%, and the participation fee for performance letters of credit is 0.625%.
In January 2016, we repaid the $286.6 million in commercial paper notes outstanding at December 31, 2015 with proceeds from short-term borrowings under our revolving credit agreement. At June 30, 2016, we had $327.3 million in short-term borrowings outstanding under our revolving credit agreement. These short-term borrowings bore interest at a weighted average interest rate of 3.4%.
As of July 27, 2016, we had $270.0 million in short-term borrowings outstanding and an additional $1.2 billion available under our revolving credit agreement.
10. Commitments and Contingencies
Various claims have been filed against us in the ordinary course of business, including claims by offshore workers alleging personal injuries. With respect to each claim or exposure, we have made an assessment, in accordance with GAAP, of the probability that the resolution of the matter would ultimately result in a loss. When we determine that an unfavorable resolution of a matter is probable and such amount of loss can be determined, we record a liability for the amount of the estimated loss at the time that both of these criteria are met. Our management believes that we have recorded adequate accruals for any liabilities that may reasonably be expected to result from these claims.
17
Asbestos Litigation . We are one of several unrelated defendants in lawsuits filed in Louisiana state courts alleging that defendants manufactured, distributed or utilized drilling mud containing asbestos and, in our case, allowed such drilling mud to have been utilized aboard our drilling rigs. The plaintiffs seek, among other things, an award of unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. The manufacture and use of asbestos-containing drilling mud had already ceased before we acquired any of the drilling rigs addressed in these lawsuits. We believe that we are not liable for the damages asserted in the lawsuits pursuant to the terms of our 1989 asset purchase agreement with Diamond M Corporation. We are unable to estimate our potential exposure, if any, to these lawsuits at this time but do not believe that our ultimate liability, if any, resulting from this litigation will have a material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Other Litigation. We have been named in various other claims, lawsuits or threatened actions that are incidental to the ordinary course of our business, including a claim by one of our customers in Brazil, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A., or Petrobras, that it will seek to recover from its contractors, including us, any taxes, penalties, interest and fees that it must pay to the Brazilian tax authorities for our applicable portion of withholding taxes related to Petrobras charter agreements with its contractors. We intend to defend these matters vigorously; however, litigation is inherently unpredictable, and the ultimate outcome or effect of these claims, lawsuits and actions cannot be predicted with certainty. As a result, there can be no assurance as to the ultimate outcome of these matters. Any claims against us, whether meritorious or not, could cause us to incur costs and expenses, require significant amounts of management time and result in the diversion of significant operational resources. In the opinion of our management, no pending or known threatened claims, actions or proceedings against us are expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NPI Arrangement. We received customer payments measured by a percentage net profits interest (primarily of 27%) under an overriding royalty interest in certain developmental oil-and-gas producing properties, or NPI, which we believe is a real property interest. Our drilling program related to the NPI was completed in 2011, and the balance of the amounts due to us under the NPI was received in 2013. However, in August 2012, the customer that conveyed the NPI to us filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. Certain parties (including the debtor) in the bankruptcy proceedings questioned whether our NPI, and certain amounts we received under it after the filing of the bankruptcy, should be included in the debtors estate under the bankruptcy proceeding. In 2013, we filed a declaratory judgment action in the bankruptcy court seeking a declaration that our NPI, and payments that we received from it since the filing of the bankruptcy, are not part of the bankruptcy estate. We agreed to a settlement with the company that purchased most of the debtors assets (including the debtors claims against our NPI) whereby the nature of our NPI will not be challenged by that party and our declaratory judgment action was dismissed. Following the settlement, the bankruptcy was converted to a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding. Several lienholders who had previously intervened in the declaratory judgment action filed motions in the bankruptcy contending that their liens have priority and seeking disgorgement of $3.25 million of payments made to us after the bankruptcy was filed. We believe that our rights to the payments at issue are superior to these liens, and we have filed appropriate motions to dismiss these claims. In addition, the bankruptcy trustee filed counterclaims seeking disgorgement of a total of $30.0 million of pre- and post-bankruptcy payments made to us under the original NPI. The bankruptcy court has dismissed all but one of the trustees disgorgement claims, which is limited in amount to $17.0 million. We continue to pursue all available defenses and available protections, and still expect the bankruptcy proceedings to be concluded with no further material impact to us.
Personal Injury Claims . Under our current insurance policies, which renewed effective May 1, 2016, our deductibles for marine liability insurance coverage with respect to personal injury claims not related to named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, which primarily result from Jones Act liability in the Gulf of Mexico, are $10.0 million for the first occurrence, with no aggregate deductible, and vary in amounts ranging between $5.0 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100.0 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims that might arise during the policy year. Our deductible for personal injury claims arising due to named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico is $25.0 million for the first occurrence, with no aggregate deductible, and vary in amounts ranging between $25.0 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100.0 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims that might arise during the policy year.
The Jones Act is a federal law that permits seamen to seek compensation for certain injuries during the course of their employment on a vessel and governs the liability of vessel operators and marine employers for the work-related injury or death of an employee. We engage outside consultants to assist us in estimating our aggregate liability for personal injury claims based on our historical losses and utilizing various actuarial models. We allocate a portion of the aggregate liability to Accrued liabilities based on an estimate of claims expected to be paid within the next twelve months with the residual recorded as Other liabilities. At June 30, 2016 our estimated liability for personal injury claims was $38.9 million, of which $6.0 million and $32.9 million were recorded in Accrued
18
liabilities and Other liabilities, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2015 our estimated liability for personal injury claims was $40.4 million, of which $8.2 million and $32.2 million were recorded in Accrued liabilities and Other liabilities, respectively, in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The eventual settlement or adjudication of these claims could differ materially from our estimated amounts due to uncertainties such as:
| the severity of personal injuries claimed; |
| significant changes in the volume of personal injury claims; |
| the unpredictability of legal jurisdictions where the claims will ultimately be litigated; |
| inconsistent court decisions; and |
| the risks and lack of predictability inherent in personal injury litigation. |
Purchase Obligations . In June 2016, we funded the final payment to HHI totaling $402.5 million in final settlement of the contract price for the Ocean GreatWhite , excluding $4.2 million in post-delivery items. The Ocean GreatWhite was delivered in mid-July 2016. We will complete a rig enhancement project in Singapore before placing the rig in service. We expect the rig enhancement project to be completed in the third quarter of 2016.
At June 30, 2016, we had no other purchase obligations for major rig upgrades or any other significant obligations, except for those related to our direct rig operations, which arise during the normal course of business. See Note 13.
Letters of Credit and Other. We were contingently liable as of June 30, 2016 in the amount of $53.6 million under certain performance, supersedeas, bid, tax and customs bonds and letters of credit. Agreements relating to approximately $48.5 million of performance, tax, supersedeas, court and customs bonds can require collateral at any time. As of June 30, 2016, we had not been required to make any collateral deposits with respect to these agreements. The remaining agreements cannot require collateral except in events of default. On our behalf, banks have issued letters of credit securing certain of these bonds.
11. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Gain (Loss)
The components of our AOCGL and related changes thereto are as follows:
Unrealized (Loss) Gain on | ||||||||||||
Derivative
Financial Instruments |
Marketable
Securities |
Total
AOCGL |
||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 |
$ | 6 | $ | (5,041 | ) | $ | (5,035 | ) | ||||
Change in other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, after tax of $0 and $2 |
| (6,558 | ) | (6,558 | ) | |||||||
Reclassification adjustments for items included in Net Loss, after tax of $1 and $0 |
(3 | ) | 11,600 | 11,597 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at June 30, 2016 |
$ | 3 | $ | 1 | $ | 4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the line items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations affected by reclassification adjustments out of AOCGL.
Three Months Ended
June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
Consolidated Statements of
Operations Line Items |
||||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||||
Major Category of AOCGL | (In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Derivative Financial Instruments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on FOREX contracts |
$ | | $ | 1,894 | $ | | $ | 7,414 |
|
Contract
drilling, excluding depreciation |
|
|||||||||
Unrealized (gain) on treasury lock agreements |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | Interest expense | |||||||||||
| (662 | ) | 1 | (2,593 | ) | Income tax expense | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total, net of tax |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | 1,230 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 4,817 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Marketable Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on marketable securities |
$ | 11,600 | $ | | $ | 11,600 | $ | | Other, net | |||||||||||
| | | | Income tax expense | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total, net of tax |
$ | 11,600 | $ | | $ | 11,600 | $ | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
12. Restructuring and Separation Costs
In early 2015, in response to the continuing decline in the offshore drilling market, we reviewed our cost and organization structure and, as a result, our management approved and initiated a reduction in workforce at our onshore bases and corporate facilities, also referred to as the Corporate Reduction Plan. We recognized $1.0 million and $7.2 million in restructuring and employee separation related costs for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2015, respectively. Substantially all costs associated with the Corporate Reduction Plan had been paid as of June 30, 2015.
13. Sale and Leaseback Transaction
In February 2016, we entered into a ten-year agreement with a subsidiary of GE Oil & Gas, or GE, to provide services with respect to certain blowout preventer and related well control equipment, or Well Control Equipment, on our four newly-built drillships. Such services include management of maintenance, certification and reliability with respect to such equipment. In connection with the contractual services agreement with GE, we agreed to sell the Well Control Equipment to another GE affiliate and subsequently lease back such equipment pursuant to separate ten-year operating leases.
During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we executed three sale and leaseback transactions with respect to the Well Control Equipment on the Ocean BlackHawk, Ocean BlackHornet and Ocean BlackLion . As a result of these transactions, we received an aggregate $157.5 million in proceeds from the sale of the Well Control Equipment on these rigs, which was less than the carrying value of the equipment. The resulting difference was recorded as prepaid rent with no gain or loss recognized on the transactions, and will be amortized over the respective terms of the operating leases. We simultaneously executed three ten-year operating lease and contractual services agreements with respect to the Well Control Equipment. Future commitments under the operating leases and contractual services agreements for the Ocean BlackHawk, Ocean BlackHornet and Ocean BlackLion are estimated to be approximately $49.0 million per year or an aggregate $491.0 million over the term of the agreements. We expect to complete the remaining sale and leaseback transaction for the Ocean BlackRhino in the third quarter of 2016.
14. Income Taxes
Our income tax expense is a function of the mix between our domestic and international pre-tax earnings or losses, as well as the mix of international tax jurisdictions in which we operate. Certain of our international rigs are owned and operated, directly or indirectly, by one of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. It is our intention to indefinitely reinvest future earnings of this subsidiary to finance foreign activities. Accordingly, we have not made a provision for U.S. income taxes on such earnings except to the extent that such earnings were immediately subject to U.S. income taxes.
At December 31, 2015 we had recorded a deferred tax asset of $33.7 million for the benefit of foreign tax credits in the U. S. which we expected to utilize prior to their expiration in 2024 and 2025. As of June 30, 2016, due to revised financial forecasts as a result of worsening market conditions for the offshore drilling industry, including expectations that a market recovery is now further in the future than previously estimated, we no longer expect to be able to realize certain future tax benefits. Accordingly, we have established a valuation allowance of $33.7 million for the prior year deferred tax asset, as well as a $43.6 million valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset for the benefit of foreign tax credits arising in 2016 that we do not expect to be able to utilize prior to their expiration.
15. Segments and Geographic Area Analysis
Although we provide contract drilling services with different types of offshore drilling rigs and also provide such services in many geographic locations, we have aggregated these operations into one reportable segment based on the similarity of economic characteristics due to the nature of the revenue earning process as it relates to the offshore drilling industry over the operating lives of our drilling rigs.
20
Revenues from contract drilling services by equipment type are listed below:
Three Months Ended
June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Floaters: |
||||||||||||||||
Ultra-Deepwater |
$ | 214,102 | $ | 315,670 | $ | 540,063 | $ | 567,066 | ||||||||
Deepwater |
67,191 | 181,104 | 126,308 | 319,874 | ||||||||||||
Mid-Water |
56,694 | 96,926 | 104,366 | 273,283 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Floaters |
337,987 | 593,700 | 770,737 | 1,160,223 | ||||||||||||
Jack-ups |
19,422 | 23,742 | 30,195 | 56,796 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total contract drilling revenues |
357,409 | 617,442 | 800,932 | 1,217,019 | ||||||||||||
Revenues related to reimbursable expenses |
31,338 | 16,590 | 58,358 | 37,069 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 388,747 | $ | 634,032 | $ | 859,290 | $ | 1,254,088 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Areas
Our drilling rigs are highly mobile and may be moved to other markets throughout the world in response to market conditions or customer needs. At June 30, 2016, our actively-marketed drilling rigs were en route to or located offshore in four countries in addition to the United States. Revenues by geographic area are presented by attributing revenues to the individual country or areas where the services were performed.
Three Months Ended
June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 130,609 | $ | 112,709 | $ | 292,191 | $ | 189,867 | ||||||||
International: |
||||||||||||||||
South America |
106,702 | 238,640 | 228,189 | 431,715 | ||||||||||||
Europe |
87,551 | 136,532 | 190,170 | 287,802 | ||||||||||||
Australia/Asia |
47,662 | 109,885 | 112,636 | 247,020 | ||||||||||||
Mexico |
16,223 | 36,266 | 36,104 | 97,684 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 388,747 | $ | 634,032 | $ | 859,290 |
$
|
1,254,088
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
ITEM 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements (including the notes thereto) included elsewhere in this report and our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Item 1A, Risk Factors included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. References to Diamond Offshore, we, us or our mean Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries.
We provide contract drilling services worldwide with a fleet of 28 offshore drilling rigs. Our current fleet consists of 19 semisubmersibles, five jack-up rigs, including four jack-up rigs that we are marketing for sale, and four dynamically positioned drillships. Our harsh environment, ultra-deepwater semisubmersible rig, the Ocean GreatWhite , was delivered in mid-July 2016 and has mobilized to Singapore for a rig enhancement project. We expect the Ocean GreatWhite to commence its contract offshore Australia in the fourth quarter of this year. Additionally, in July 2016, we reached a decision to sell the Ocean Quest and Ocean Star for scrap value.
Market Overview
Overall fundamentals in the offshore oil and gas industry have continued to deteriorate. Oil prices, which had fallen to a 12-year low below $30 per barrel in January 2016, had rebounded to the upper $40 per barrel range as of June 30, 2016, but continue to exhibit day-to-day volatility due to multiple factors, including fluctuations in the current and expected level of global oil inventories. Despite the increase in oil prices during the second quarter of 2016, industry reports indicate that utilization for floaters continues to fall at a rate of approximately 5% per quarter and cancelation of contracts for deepwater rigs has persisted. Significant operating losses incurred during 2015 and 2016 by many independent and national oil companies and exploration and production companies, as well as an uncertain outlook with respect to future demand for oil and gas and the resulting price instability, have resulted in significantly reduced capital spending plans for 2016 and possibly beyond, as operators struggle to stay cash neutral in the current oil price environment. Customer inquiries for rig availability and new tenders have continued to decline in 2016, as compared to prior years. The majority of our recent customer discussions related to new projects are for work that materializes in 2018 and later.
Based on industry reports, since 2014, approximately 55 floater rigs have been retired and others have been cold stacked, slightly abating the current oversupply of drilling rigs. However, the number of available rigs continues to grow as contracted rigs come off contract and newly-built rigs are delivered. Competition for the limited number of drilling jobs continues to be intense. In some cases, dayrates have been negotiated at near break-even levels to provide for the recovery of operating costs for rigs that would otherwise be uncontracted or cold stacked. Market studies indicate that dayrates for sixth- generation rigs have declined on average by double digits during the second quarter of 2016, compared to the fourth quarter of 2015. Industry analysts have predicted that the offshore contract drilling market may remain depressed with further declines in dayrates and utilization likely in 2016 and 2017.
As a result of the continuing and worsening market conditions for the offshore drilling industry and continued pessimistic outlook for the near term, certain of our customers, as well as those of our competitors, have attempted to renegotiate or terminate existing drilling contracts. Such renegotiations could include requests to lower the contract dayrate, lowering of a dayrate in exchange for additional contract term, shortening the term on one contracted rig in exchange for additional term on another rig, early termination of a contract in exchange for a lump sum margin payout and many other possibilities. In addition to the potential for renegotiations, some of our drilling contracts permit the customer to terminate the contract early after specified notice periods, usually resulting in a contractually specified termination amount, which may not fully compensate us for the loss of the contract. As a result of these depressed market conditions, certain customers have also utilized such contract clauses to seek to renegotiate or terminate a drilling contract or claim that we have breached provisions of our drilling contracts in order to avoid their obligations to us under circumstances where we believe we are in compliance with the contracts.
On April 28, 2016, our subsidiarys agent in Mexico received a letter from PEMEX Exploración y Producción, or PEMEX, exercising its contractual right to terminate its drilling contract on the Ocean Scepter with 30 days advance notice, resulting in the early termination of the contract on May 28, 2016. Industrywide, during the first half of 2016, industry reports indicate that customers canceled 21 contracts for floater rigs, compared to 31 contract cancelations for deepwater drilling rigs during the full year 2015. Particularly during depressed market conditions, the early termination of a contract may result in a rig being idle for an extended period of time, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. When a customer terminates our contract prior to the contracts scheduled expiration, our contract backlog is also adversely impacted.
22
The continuation of these conditions for an extended period could result in more of our rigs being without contracts and/or cold stacked or scrapped and could further materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. When we cold stack or expect to scrap a rig, we evaluate the rig for impairment. We currently expect that these adverse market conditions will continue for the foreseeable future. As of August 1, 2016, 17 rigs in our fleet were cold stacked, including four jack-up rigs that are currently being marketed for sale. See Contract Drilling Backlog for future commitments of our rigs during 2016 through 2020.
Although these general market conditions impact all segments of the offshore drilling market, the following discussion addresses market conditions within segments of the floater market.
Floater Markets
Ultra-Deepwater and Deepwater Floaters. Globally, the ultra-deepwater and deepwater floater markets continue to worsen. Diminished or nonexistent demand, combined with an oversupply of rigs, has caused floater dayrates to decline significantly. Industry analysts expect offshore drillers to continue to scrap older, lower specification rigs; however, newer and higher specification rigs have also been impacted by the recycling trend.
In an effort to manage the oversupply of rigs and potentially avoid the cost of cold stacking newly-built rigs, which, in the case of dynamically-positioned rigs, can be significant, several drilling contractors have exercised options to delay the delivery of rigs by the shipyard or have exercised their right to cancel orders due to the late delivery of rigs. As of the date of this report, industry data indicates that there are approximately 37 competitive, or non-owner-operated, newbuild floaters on order, of which only three rigs are reported to be contracted for future work. Of the 37 rigs on order, 13 and 15 rigs are scheduled for delivery in the remainder of 2016 and in 2017, respectively. The remaining nine rigs are scheduled for delivery between 2018 and 2020. Industry analysts predict that delivery dates may shift further as newbuild owners negotiate with their respective shipyards.
Mid-Water Floaters. While conditions in the mid-water market vary slightly by region, mid-water rigs have been adversely impacted by (i) lower demand, (ii) declining dayrates, (iii) increased regulatory requirements, including more stringent design requirements for well control equipment, which could significantly increase the capital needed to comply with design requirements that would permit such rigs to work in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, or GOM, (iv) the challenges experienced by lower specification units in this segment as a result of more complex customer specifications and (v) the intensified competition resulting from the migration of some deepwater and ultra-deepwater units to compete against mid-water units. To date, the mid-water market has seen the highest number of cold-stacked and scrapped rigs. Since 2012, we have sold 12 of our mid-water rigs for scrap. As market conditions remain challenging, we expect higher-specification rigs to take the place of lower-specification units, where possible, leading to additional lower-specification rigs being cold stacked or ultimately scrapped. Our current mid-water fleet consists of six drilling rigs, of which only two units are currently operating under contract.
GOM Floaters . On April 14, 2016, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, or BSEE, issued its final well control regulations, which have now become effective, although, several of the new requirements have extended timeframes for compliance. The final rule addresses the full range of systems and equipment associated with well control operations, focusing on requirements for blowout preventers, or BOPs, well design, well control casing, cementing, real-time monitoring and subsea containment. The regulations combine prescriptive and performance-based measures to cultivate a greater culture of safety for both oil and gas companies and offshore rig operators that minimizes risk. Key features of the well control regulations include requirements for BOPs, double shear rams, third-party reviews of equipment, real-time monitoring data, safe drilling margins, centralizers, inspections and other reforms related to well design and control, casing, cementing and subsea containment.
The issuance of these rules could result in the future retirement of older, less capable rigs, for which compliance with the new requirements is not physically or economically feasible. Additionally, some analysts predict that the new rules will drive the continued preference for modern floaters when drilling opportunities present. See Important Factors That May Impact Our Operating Results, Financial Condition or Cash Flows.
Our results of operations and cash flows for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 have been negatively impacted by the continuing and worsening market conditions in the offshore drilling industry, as discussed above. See Results of Operations and Liquidity and Capital Resources and Notes 1 and 2 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
23
Contract Drilling Backlog
The following table reflects our contract drilling backlog as of August 1, 2016, February 16, 2016 (the date reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015), and July, 1 2015 (the date reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015). Contract drilling backlog as presented below includes only firm commitments (typically represented by signed contracts) and is calculated by multiplying the contracted operating dayrate by the firm contract period. Our calculation also assumes full utilization of our drilling equipment for the contract period (excluding scheduled shipyard and survey days); however, the amount of actual revenue earned and the actual periods during which revenues are earned will be different than the amounts and periods shown in the tables below due to various factors. Utilization rates, which generally approach 92-98% during contracted periods, can be adversely impacted by downtime due to various operating factors including, but not limited to, weather conditions and unscheduled repairs and maintenance. Contract drilling backlog excludes revenues for mobilization, demobilization, contract preparation and customer reimbursables. No revenue is generally earned during periods of downtime for regulatory surveys. Changes in our contract drilling backlog between periods are generally a function of the performance of work on term contracts, as well as the extension or modification of existing term contracts and the execution of additional contracts. In addition, under certain circumstances, our customers may seek to terminate or renegotiate our contracts.
August 1,
2016 |
February 16,
2016 |
July 1,
2015 |
||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Contract Drilling Backlog |
||||||||||||
Floaters: |
||||||||||||
Ultra-Deepwater (1) |
$ | 3,875,000 | $ | 4,415,000 | $ | 4,902,000 | ||||||
Deepwater |
291,000 | 375,000 | 621,000 | |||||||||
Mid-Water |
250,000 | 356,000 | 378,000 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Floaters |
4,416,000 | 5,146,000 | 5,901,000 | |||||||||
Jack-ups |
| 49,000 | 33,000 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 4,416,000 | $ | 5,195,000 | $ | 5,934,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Contract drilling backlog as of August 1, 2016 for our ultra-deepwater floaters includes $641.0 million for the years 2016 to 2019 attributable to future work for the semisubmersible Ocean GreatWhite , which is expected to begin working under contract in the fourth quarter of 2016. |
The following table reflects the amount of our contract drilling backlog by year as of August 1, 2016.
For the Years Ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 2016 (1) | 2017 | 2018 | 2019-2020 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Contract Drilling Backlog |
||||||||||||||||||||
Floaters: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Ultra-Deepwater (2) |
$ | 3,875,000 | $ | 510,000 | $ | 1,199,000 | $ | 1,142,000 | $ | 1,024,000 | ||||||||||
Deepwater |
291,000 | 130,000 | 152,000 | 9,000 | | |||||||||||||||
Mid-Water |
250,000 | 114,000 | 136,000 | | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Floaters |
4,416,000 | 754,000 | 1,487,000 | 1,151,000 | 1,024,000 | |||||||||||||||
Jack-ups |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,416,000 | $ | 754,000 | $ | 1,487,000 | $ | 1,151,000 | $ | 1,024,000 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Represents the six-month period beginning July 1, 2016. |
(2) | Contract drilling backlog as of August 1, 2016 for our ultra-deepwater floaters includes $35.0 million for the year 2016, $214.0 million for each of the years 2017 and 2018, and $178.0 million for the year 2019 attributable to future work for the Ocean GreatWhite , which is expected to begin working under contract in the fourth quarter of 2016. |
The following table reflects the percentage of rig days committed by year as of August 1, 2016. The percentage of rig days committed is calculated as the ratio of total days committed under contracts, as well as scheduled shipyard, survey and mobilization days for all rigs in our fleet, to total available days (number of rigs, including cold-stacked rigs, multiplied by the number of days in a particular year). Total available days have been calculated based on the expected contract start date for the Ocean GreatWhite , which is under construction.
24
For the Years Ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2016 (1) | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 - 2020 | |||||||||||||
Rig Days Committed (2) |
||||||||||||||||
Floaters: |
||||||||||||||||
Ultra-Deepwater |
56 | % | 58 | % | 57 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||
Deepwater |
31 | % | 19 | % | 2 | % | | |||||||||
Mid-Water |
33 | % | 17 | % | | | ||||||||||
All Floaters |
43 | % | 38 | % | 28 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||
Jack-ups |
| | | |
(1) | Represents the six-month period beginning July 1, 2016. |
(2) | As of August 1, 2016, includes approximately 31 currently known, scheduled shipyard days for contract preparation, surveys and extended maintenance projects, as well as rig mobilization days, for the remainder of 2016. |
Important Factors That May Impact Our Operating Results, Financial Condition or Cash Flows
Regulatory Surveys, Planned Downtime and Regulatory Compliance. Our operating income is negatively impacted when we perform certain regulatory inspections, which we refer to as a 5-year survey, or special survey, that are due every five years for each of our rigs. We can provide no assurance as to the exact timing and/or duration of downtime associated with regulatory inspections, planned rig mobilizations and other shipyard projects. See Contract Drilling Backlog .
As previously discussed, BSEEs final well control regulations became effective in July 2016. We are currently assessing the final rules and have not yet determined the costs to comply with the additional requirements to enable our drilling rigs to be eligible to operate in U.S. waters.
Physical Damage and Marine Liability Insurance. We are self-insured for physical damage to rigs and equipment caused by named windstorms in the GOM. If a named windstorm in the GOM causes significant damage to our rigs or equipment, it could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Under our current insurance policy, which renewed effective May 1, 2016, we carry physical damage insurance for certain losses other than those caused by named windstorms in the GOM for which our deductible for physical damage is $25.0 million per occurrence. We do not typically retain loss-of-hire insurance policies to cover our rigs.
In addition, under our current insurance policy, which renewed effective May 1, 2016, we carry marine liability insurance covering certain legal liabilities, including coverage for certain personal injury claims, and generally covering liabilities arising out of or relating to pollution and/or environmental risk. We believe that the policy limit for our marine liability insurance is within the range that is customary for companies of our size in the offshore drilling industry and is appropriate for our business. Our deductibles for marine liability coverage related to insurable events arising due to named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico is $25.0 million for the first occurrence, with no aggregate deductible, and vary in amounts ranging between $25.0 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100.0 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims that might arise during the policy year. Our deductibles for other marine liability coverage, including personal injury claims not related to named windstorms in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, are $10.0 million for the first occurrence and vary in amounts ranging between $5.0 million and, if aggregate claims exceed certain thresholds, up to $100.0 million for each subsequent occurrence, depending on the nature, severity and frequency of claims that might arise during the policy year.
Construction and Capital Upgrade Projects. We capitalize interest cost for the construction and upgrade of qualifying assets in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., or GAAP. The period of interest capitalization covers the duration of the activities required to make the asset ready for its intended use, and the capitalization period ends when the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use. During the first half of 2016, we capitalized interest of $7.2 million related to the construction of the Ocean GreatWhite and will continue capitalizing interest on this project until completion of its enhancement project, which we expect to occur in the third quarter of 2016.
25
Critical Accounting Policies
Our significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 of our notes to audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. There were no material changes to these policies during the three months ended June 30, 2016.
Results of Operations
Although we perform contract drilling services with different types of drilling rigs and in many geographic locations, there is a similarity of economic characteristics among all our divisions and locations, including the nature of services provided and the type of customers for our services. We believe that the combination of our drilling rigs into one reportable segment is the appropriate aggregation in accordance with applicable accounting standards on segment reporting. However, for purposes of this discussion and analysis of our results of operations, we provide greater detail with respect to the types of rigs in our fleet to enhance the readers understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations.
Key performance indicators by equipment type are listed below.
Three Months Ended
June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
REVENUE EARNING DAYS (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Floaters: |
||||||||||||||||
Ultra-Deepwater |
473 | 654 | 1,085 | 1,160 | ||||||||||||
Deepwater |
223 | 402 | 400 | 687 | ||||||||||||
Mid-Water |
181 | 349 | 362 | 1,012 | ||||||||||||
Jack-ups |
58 | 287 | 149 | 645 | ||||||||||||
UTILIZATION (2) |
||||||||||||||||
Floaters: |
||||||||||||||||
Ultra-Deepwater |
47 | % | 63 | % | 54 | % | 57 | % | ||||||||
Deepwater |
35 | % | 63 | % | 31 | % | 54 | % | ||||||||
Mid-Water |
30 | % | 32 | % | 27 | % | 42 | % | ||||||||
Jack-ups |
13 | % | 53 | % | 16 | % | 59 | % | ||||||||
AVERAGE DAILY REVENUE (3) |
||||||||||||||||
Floaters: |
||||||||||||||||
Ultra-Deepwater |
$ | 452,400 | $ | 483,000 | $ | 497,800 | $ | 489,000 | ||||||||
Deepwater |
300,700 | 450,900 | 315,600 | 465,700 | ||||||||||||
Mid-Water |
313,300 | 278,000 | 288,200 | 270,000 | ||||||||||||
Jack-ups |
334,900 | 82,800 | 202,700 | 88,100 |
(1) | A revenue earning day is defined as a 24-hour period during which a rig earns a dayrate after commencement of operations and excludes mobilization, demobilization and contract preparation days. |
(2) | Utilization is calculated as the ratio of total revenue-earning days divided by the total calendar days in the period for all specified rigs in our fleet (including cold-stacked rigs, but excluding rigs under construction). As of June 30, 2016, our cold-stacked rigs included four ultra-deepwater semisubmersibles, four deepwater semisubmersibles, four mid-water semisubmersibles and five jack-up rigs. |
(3) | Average daily revenue is defined as total contract drilling revenue for all of the specified rigs in our fleet per revenue earning day. |
26
Comparative data relating to our revenues and operating expenses by equipment type are listed below.
Three Months Ended
June 30, |
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
CONTRACT DRILLING REVENUE |
||||||||||||||||
Floaters: |
||||||||||||||||
Ultra-Deepwater |
$ | 214,102 | $ | 315,670 | $ | 540,063 | $ | 567,066 | ||||||||
Deepwater |
67,191 | 181,104 | 126,308 | 319,874 | ||||||||||||
Mid-Water |
56,694 | 96,926 | 104,366 | 273,283 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Floaters |
337,987 | 593,700 | 770,737 | 1,160,223 | ||||||||||||
Jack-ups |
19,422 | 23,742 | 30,195 | 56,796 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Contract Drilling Revenue |
$ | 357,409 | $ | 617,442 | $ | 800,932 | $ | 1,217,019 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
REVENUES RELATED TO REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES |
$ | 31,338 | $ | 16,590 | $ | 58,358 | $ | 37,069 | ||||||||
CONTRACT DRILLING EXPENSE |
||||||||||||||||
Floaters: |
||||||||||||||||
Ultra-Deepwater |
$ | 127,185 | $ | 161,485 | $ | 250,921 | $ | 316,024 | ||||||||
Deepwater |
34,776 | 86,464 | 82,285 | 150,139 | ||||||||||||
Mid-Water |
25,862 | 66,735 | 49,746 | 166,055 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Floaters |
187,823 | 314,684 | 382,952 | 632,218 | ||||||||||||
Jack-ups |
6,876 | 20,873 | 12,931 | 42,443 | ||||||||||||
Other |
3,637 | 7,312 | 15,294 | 18,866 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Contract Drilling Expense |
$ | 198,336 | $ | 342,869 | $ | 411,177 | $ | 693,527 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES |
$ | 16,527 | $ | 16,336 | $ | 43,318 | $ | 36,428 | ||||||||
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME |
||||||||||||||||
Floaters: |
||||||||||||||||
Ultra-Deepwater |
$ | 86,917 | $ | 154,185 | $ | 289,142 | $ | 251,042 | ||||||||
Deepwater |
32,415 | 94,640 | 44,023 | 169,735 | ||||||||||||
Mid-Water |
30,832 | 30,191 | 54,620 | 107,228 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Floaters |
150,164 | 279,016 | 387,785 | 528,005 | ||||||||||||
Jack-ups |
12,546 | 2,869 | 17,264 | 14,353 | ||||||||||||
Other |
(3,637 | ) | (7,312 | ) | (15,294 | ) | (18,866 | ) | ||||||||
Reimbursable expenses, net |
14,811 | 254 | 15,040 | 641 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
(105,016 | ) | (123,329 | ) | (209,256 | ) | (260,628 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative expense |
(18,139 | ) | (16,548 | ) | (33,537 | ) | (34,000 | ) | ||||||||
Gain on disposition of assets |
747 | 164 | 1,043 | 775 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of assets |
(678,145 | ) | | (678,145 | ) | (358,528 | ) | |||||||||
Restructuring and separation costs |
| (993 | ) | | (7,161 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Operating (Loss) Income |
$ | (626,669 | ) | $ | 134,121 | $ | (515,100 | ) | $ | (135,409 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
269 | 584 | 442 | 1,167 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized |
(24,156 | ) | (25,468 | ) | (49,672 | ) | (49,450 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign currency transaction (loss) gain |
(3,513 | ) | (3,473 | ) | (7,121 | ) | 2,117 | |||||||||
Other, net |
(12,046 | ) | 264 | (11,468 | ) | 485 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Loss) income before income tax benefit (expense) |
(666,115 | ) | 106,028 | (582,919 | ) | (181,090 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax benefit (expense) |
76,178 | (15,642 | ) | 80,407 | 15,767 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
$ | (589,937 | ) | $ | 90,386 | $ | (502,512 | ) | $ | (165,323 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
Overview
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Operating (Loss) Income. Operating results for the second quarter of 2016 decreased $760.8 million compared to the same period of 2015, primarily due to an impairment loss of $678.1 million recognized in the second quarter of 2016 combined with the negative effect of lower utilization of our fleet. These negative effects were partially offset by an $18.3 million decrease in depreciation expense in the second quarter of 2016 as a result of a lower depreciable asset base, primarily due to assets impaired in 2015. In addition, we recognized net reimbursable income of $14.6 million in the second quarter of 2016 as a result of the completion of the Ocean Endeavor s demobilization from the Black Sea.
Contract drilling revenue and expense decreased $260.0 million and $144.5 million, respectively, during the second quarter of 2016, compared to the second quarter of 2015, primarily due to additional rigs being idled, cold stacked or retired since the second quarter of 2015. Revenue earning days for our aggregate fleet decreased by 757 days during the second quarter of 2016, compared to the second quarter of 2015, reflective of continued low demand for contract drilling services. Contract drilling expense for the same period also declined, reflecting lower costs for labor and personnel ($62.2 million), repairs and maintenance ($23.5 million), mobilization of rigs ($29.1 million), inspections ($5.9 million), agency fees ($4.3 million), freight ($4.6 million), and a net decrease in other rig operating costs and overhead costs ($15.0 million).
Impairment of Assets . During the second quarter of 2016, we evaluated 15 of our drilling rigs with indications that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Based on this evaluation, we determined that the carrying values of two mid-water, three deepwater, and three ultra-deepwater floaters, including related rig spares and supplies were impaired and recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $678.1 million in the second quarter of 2016. See Notes 1, 2 and 3 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
Other, net. During the second quarter of 2016, we sold our investment in privately-held corporate bonds for a total recognized loss of $12.1 million.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense). Our effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was 11.4 %, compared to a 14.8% effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2015. The effective tax rate in the 2016 period was lower than in the same period of 2015 in large part due to the mix of our domestic and international pre-tax earnings and losses. Income tax benefit for the second quarter of 2016 also included a U.S. tax benefit of $143.1 million related to asset impairments in the U.S. tax jurisdiction partially offset by a valuation allowance of $77.3 million for current and prior year tax assets associated with foreign tax credits.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Operating (Loss) Income. Operating results for the first six months of 2016 decreased $379.7 million compared to the same period of 2015, primarily due to higher impairment losses recognized in the current year period ($319.6 million) combined with the negative impact of lower utilization for our rig fleet. These negative effects on operating income were partially offset by a $51.4 million decrease in depreciation expense and the recognition of $14.6 million in net reimbursable income related to the completion of the Ocean Endeavor s demobilization from the Black Sea during the first half of 2016. Depreciation expense decreased primarily due to a lower depreciable asset base in 2016, compared to the first half of 2015, as a result of asset impairments taken in 2015.
Contract drilling revenue decreased $416.1 million, or 34%, during the first half of 2016, compared to the same period of 2015, primarily as a result of an aggregate of 1,508 fewer revenue earning days across our entire fleet, reflecting continued low demand for offshore drilling services, combined with the negative effect of lower average daily revenue earned by our deepwater floaters.
Total contract drilling expense decreased $282.4 million, or 41%, during the first six months of 2016, compared to the same period of 2015, reflecting lower overall operating costs, primarily for labor and personnel ($126.8 million), repairs and maintenance ($46.4 million), shorebase and overhead costs ($28.7 million), amortized mobilization costs ($26.3 million), inspections ($11.2 million), freight ($11.1 million), revenue-based agency fees ($9.9 million) and an aggregate decrease in other rig operating and overhead costs ($22.0 million). The reduction in contract drilling expense during the first half of 2016 reflected reduced costs associated with rigs idled, cold stacked or retired during 2015 and in 2016, as well as the favorable results of cost control initiatives implemented during 2015.
28
Impairment of Assets . During the first quarter of 2015, we evaluated all of our mid-water semisubmersibles, as well as one drillship, for impairment. Based on this evaluation, we determined that the carrying values of our 7,875-foot water depth rated drillship, the Ocean Clipper , and seven of mid-water floaters, were impaired and recorded an aggregate impairment loss of $358.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2015. During the first six months of 2016, we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $678.1 million. See Results of Operations OverviewThree Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 Impairment of Assets and Notes 1, 2 and 3 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
Restructuring and Separation Costs. During the first quarter of 2015, in response to the decline in the offshore drilling market, our management approved and initiated a reduction in workforce at our onshore bases and corporate facilities, which resulted in the recognition of $7.2 million in restructuring and other employee separation related costs during the first half of 2015.
Other, net. During the second quarter of 2016, we sold our investment in privately-placed corporate bonds for a total recognized loss of $12.1 million.
Income Tax Benefit (Expense). Our effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was 13.8%, compared to an 8.7% effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015. The effective tax rate in the 2016 period was higher than in the same period of 2015 primarily due to the mix of our domestic and international pre-tax earnings and losses, as well as a $77.3 million valuation allowance for current and prior year tax assets associated with foreign tax credits recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2016.
Contract Drilling Revenue and Expense by Equipment Type
Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Ultra-Deepwater Floaters. Revenue generated by our ultra-deepwater floaters decreased $101.6 million during the second quarter of 2016, compared to the same period of 2015, primarily as a result of 181 fewer revenue earning days ($87.1 million) and lower average daily revenue earned ($14.5 million). Revenue earning days in the second quarter of 2016 decreased, compared to the second quarter of 2015, primarily due to an aggregate of 235 fewer revenue earning days for cold-stacked rigs, which were under contract during the 2015 period, 64 fewer revenue earning days for the Ocean Clipper , which was sold in November 2015, and 41 fewer revenue earning days for the Ocean BlackRhino , which is currently between contracts, and downtime associated with four unplanned retrievals of blowout preventers. The decrease in revenue earning days was partially offset by 63 incremental revenue earning days for the Ocean BlackLion , which was placed in service in the third quarter of 2015 and 91 incremental operating days for the Ocean Monarch , which was warm stacked during the second quarter of 2015. Average daily revenue decreased during the second quarter of 2016, compared to the prior year period, primarily due to a lower dayrate earned by the Ocean Courage .
Contract drilling expense for our ultra-deepwater floaters decreased $34.3 million during the second quarter of 2016, compared to the same period of 2015. Reduced costs attributable to our cold-stacked ultra-deepwater rigs and the retired Ocean Clipper , as well as the favorable effects of cost reduction initiatives implemented in 2015, were partially offset by incremental contract drilling expense of $23.7 million for our drillships operating in the GOM, including the Ocean BlackLion ($19.5 million), which began operating in 2016. Reductions in contract drilling expense in the second quarter of 2016 included costs associated with labor and personnel ($27.6 million), repairs and maintenance ($8.6 million), mobilization of rigs ($9.7 million), revenue-based agency fees ($2.6 million), freight ($2.4 million) and other rig operating and overhead costs ($7.1 million).
Deepwater Floaters. Revenue generated by our deepwater floaters decreased $113.9 million in the second quarter of 2016, compared to the same quarter in 2015, primarily due to 179 fewer revenue earning days ($80.4 million) combined with lower average daily revenue earned ($33.5 million) during the current year quarter. The decrease in revenue earning days resulted primarily from additional downtime associated with cold-stacked rigs that had operated during the second quarter of 2015 (263 fewer days), partially offset by incremental revenue earning days for the Ocean Victory and Ocean Valiant , both of which continued operating under contracts that commenced in the middle of the second quarter of 2015 (53 incremental days), and the Ocean Apex , which began operating under contract offshore Australia in May 2016 (30 incremental days). Average daily revenue decreased during the second quarter of 2016, primarily due to the absence of a $10.0 million demobilization fee for the Ocean Apex recognized in the second quarter of 2015, combined with the effect of a lower dayrate earned by the Ocean Valiant during the second quarter of 2016 compared to the prior year period.
29
Contract drilling expense incurred by our deepwater floaters decreased $51.7 million during the second quarter of 2016, compared to the same period of 2015, primarily due to reduced operating costs for our cold stacked deepwater rigs ($47.8 million).
Mid-Water Floaters. Revenue generated by our mid-water floaters decreased $40.2 million in the second quarter of 2016, compared to the same quarter in 2015, primarily due to 168 fewer revenue earning days ($46.6 million), partially offset by higher average daily revenue earned ($6.4 million). Revenue earnings days decreased in the second quarter of 2016 as a result of downtime associated with cold-stacked rigs (210 additional days), partially offset by the absence of planned downtime associated with the Ocean Guardian s survey during the prior year quarter (42 fewer days). We retired ten mid-waters rigs subsequent to the second quarter of 2015.
Contract drilling expense for our mid-water floaters decreased $40.9 million in the second quarter of 2016, compared to the prior year quarter, primarily due to reduced operating costs for our cold stacked or retired mid-water rigs ($30.6 million), combined with lower repair and inspection costs for the Ocean Guardian during the current year quarter ($8.6 million).
Jack-ups. Contract drilling revenue and expense for our jack-up fleet decreased $4.3 million and $14.0 million, respectively, during the second quarter of 2016, compared to the same period of 2015, primarily due to the cold stacking of our jack-up fleet, several of which had operated under contract during the prior year quarter. The Ocean Scepter is in the process of being cold stacked after termination of its contract by PEMEX in the second quarter of 2016. Our four remaining jack-up rigs are currently being marketed for sale.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015
Ultra-Deepwater Floaters. Revenue generated by our ultra-deepwater floaters during the first six months of 2016 decreased $27.0 million compared to the same period of 2015, primarily as a result of an aggregate of 75 fewer revenue earning days ($36.6 million), partially offset by higher average daily revenue earned ($9.6 million). Revenue earning days for the first half of 2016 decreased primarily due to 369 and 127 fewer revenue earning days for rigs cold stacked after the first half of 2015 and the previously-owned Ocean Clipper , respectively. The aggregate decrease in revenue earning days was partially offset by 235 incremental revenue earning days for our newbuild drillships, including 106 revenue earning days for the Ocean BlackLion, w hich began operating under contract in the second half of 2015, and 182 incremental operating days for the Ocean Monarch , which was warm stacked during the first half of 2015. Average daily revenue increased during the first half of 2016, compared to the prior year period, primarily due to the recognition of $40.0 million in demobilization revenue for the Ocean Endeavor , which completed its contract in the Black Sea in January 2016, partially offset by a lower dayrate earned by the Ocean Courage , compared to the dayrate earned during the first half of 2015.
Contract drilling expense for our ultra-deepwater floaters, excluding our newbuild drillships, decreased $123.0 million during the first half of 2016, compared to the first half of 2015, reflecting lower expenses for labor and personnel ($56.5 million), maintenance and inspections ($28.7 million), mobilization ($12.7 million), freight ($6.4 million) and other rig operating and overhead costs ($18.7 million). These reductions in contract drilling expense were primarily due to lower costs for our cold-stacked rigs and the retired Ocean Clipper , as well as cost reduction initiatives implemented in 2015. Incremental contract drilling expense for our four drillships operating in the GOM was $57.9 million.
Deepwater Floaters. Revenue generated by our deepwater floaters decreased $193.6 million in the first half of 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to 287 fewer revenue earning days ($133.6 million) and lower average daily revenue earned ($60.0 million). The decrease in revenue earning days for the first six months of 2016 resulted primarily from additional downtime associated with the cold stacking of rigs that had operated during the first half of 2015 (517 fewer days), partially offset by incremental revenue earning days for the Ocean Victory and Ocean Valiant , both of which operated under contracts that commenced in the middle of the second quarter of 2015 (230 incremental days). Average daily revenue decreased as a result of lower amortized mobilization and contract preparation fees recognized in the first half of 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 ($18.2 million), combined with a lower dayrate earned by the Ocean Valiant compared to the prior year period.
Contract drilling expense incurred by our deepwater floaters decreased $67.9 million during the first half of 2016, compared to the same period of 2015, primarily due to a net reduction in costs associated with labor and personnel ($24.6 million), mobilization of rigs ($14.9 million), repairs and maintenance ($11.1 million), shorebase support and overhead ($7.6 million) and other operating costs ($9.6 million), primarily as a result of the cold stacking of rigs, partially offset by incremental operating costs for the Ocean Victory and Ocean Valiant .
30
Mid-Water Floaters. Revenue generated by our mid-water floaters during the first six months of 2016 decreased $168.9 million compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to 650 fewer revenue earning days ($175.5 million), reflecting a significant reduction in demand in the mid-water drilling market. Comparing the periods, only two of our mid-water floaters operated during both periods. Since the first quarter of 2015, we have sold ten mid-water floaters, reducing our mid-water fleet to six drilling rigs, four of which are currently cold stacked.
Contract drilling expense for our mid-water floaters decreased $116.3 million in the first half of 2016, compared to the prior year period, reflecting lower costs for labor and personnel ($51.9 million), maintenance and repairs ($13.5 million), shorebase support and overheads ($13.1 million), mobilization ($7.8 million), inspections ($6.3 million), cold stacking of rigs ($6.4 million), penalties ($4.3 million) and other ($13.0 million).
Jack-ups. Contract drilling revenue and expense for our jack-up fleet decreased $26.6 million and $29.5 million, respectively, during the first six months of 2016, compared to the prior year period, primarily due to the cold stacking of four rigs that operated under contract during the first half of 2015.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We principally rely on our cash flows from operations and cash reserves to meet our liquidity needs and may also utilize short-term borrowings under our $1.5 billion syndicated revolving credit agreement, or Credit Agreement. See Credit Agreement.
Based on our cash available for current operations and contractual backlog of $4.4 billion as of June 30, 2016, of which $0.8 billion is expected to be realized during the second half of 2016, we believe our 2016 capital expenditures will be funded from our cash and cash equivalents, future operating cash flows and borrowings under our Credit Agreement, as needed. See Cash Flow, Capital Expenditures and Contractual Obligations Contractual Cash Obligations Rig Construction.
Certain of our international rigs are owned and operated, directly or indirectly, by Diamond Foreign Asset Company, or DFAC, and, as a result of our intention to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of DFAC and its foreign subsidiaries to finance our foreign activities, we do not expect such earnings to be available for distribution to our stockholders or to finance our domestic activities. To the extent available, we expect to utilize the operating cash flows generated by and cash reserves of DFAC and the operating cash flows available to and cash reserves of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. to meet each entitys respective working capital requirements and capital commitments.
At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had cash available for current operations as follows:
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 103,279 | $ | 119,028 | ||||
Marketable securities |
57 | 11,518 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cash available for current operations |
$ | 103,336 | $ | 130,546 | ||||
|
|
|
|
A substantial portion of our cash flows has been invested in the enhancement of our drilling fleet. We determine the amount of cash required to meet our capital commitments by evaluating our rig construction obligations, the need to upgrade rigs to meet specific customer requirements and our ongoing rig equipment enhancement/replacement programs. We make periodic assessments of our capital spending programs based on current and expected industry conditions and make adjustments thereto if required. See Cash Flow, Capital Expenditures and Contractual Obligations Capital Expenditures.
We pay dividends at the discretion of our Board of Directors, or Board. Any determination to declare a dividend, as well as the amount of any dividend that may be declared, will be based on the Boards consideration of our financial position, earnings, earnings outlook, capital spending plans, outlook on current and future market conditions and business needs and other factors that our Board considers relevant at that time. On February 8, 2016, we announced that we would discontinue our quarterly regular cash dividend. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, we paid regular cash dividends totaling $34.3 million.
31
Depending on market and other conditions, we may, from time to time, purchase shares of our common stock in the open market or otherwise. We did not purchase any shares of our outstanding common stock during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, our primary source of cash was an aggregate $305.5 million generated by operating activities, $157.5 million from the sale and leaseback of certain equipment on three of our drillships, $40.7 million in net short-term borrowings under our Credit Agreement and $10.0 million in proceeds from the sale of one jack-up rig and two mid-water floaters. See Cash Flow, Capital Expenditures and Contractual Obligations Contractual Cash ObligationsPressure Control by the Hour. Cash usage during the same period was primarily for capital expenditures aggregating $533.4 million, including the final payment to Hyundai Heavy Industries co., Ltd., or HHI, for the Ocean GreatWhite .
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2015, our primary source of cash was an aggregate $200.8 million generated by operating activities, $375.0 million from short-term borrowings and $7.7 million from the disposition of assets, including $4.8 million in proceeds from the sale of seven mid-water floaters for scrap during the period. Cash usage during the same period was primarily $686.1 million towards the construction of new rigs and our ongoing rig equipment enhancement/replacement program, including the final construction installment on the Ocean BlackLion, and $35.1 million for the payment of dividends and anti-dilution adjustments to stock plan participants.
We may, from time to time, issue debt or equity securities, or a combination thereof, to finance capital expenditures, the acquisition of assets and businesses or for general corporate purposes. Our ability to access the capital markets by issuing debt or equity securities will be dependent on our results of operations, our current financial condition, current credit ratings, current market conditions and other factors beyond our control.
Cash Flow, Capital Expenditures and Contractual Obligations
Our cash flow from operations and capital expenditures for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
Six Months Ended
June 30, |
||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Cash flow from operations |
$ | 305,470 | $ | 200,844 | ||||
Cash capital expenditures: |
||||||||
Drillship construction |
$ | | $ | 407,980 | ||||
Major upgrade of deepwater floaters |
| 34,020 | ||||||
Construction of ultra-deepwater floater |
446,737 | 21,828 | ||||||
Ocean Patriot enhancement project |
| 1,448 | ||||||
Ocean Confidence service-life extension project |
| 74,825 | ||||||
Rig equipment and replacement programs |
86,675 | 146,010 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total capital expenditures |
$ | 533,412 | $ | 686,111 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow. Cash flow from operations increased approximately $104.6 million during the first six months of 2016, compared to the first six months of 2015, primarily due to a net decrease in cash payments for contract drilling and general and administrative expenses, including personnel-related, repairs and maintenance, and other rig operating costs ($361.2 million), partially offset by lower cash receipts for contract drilling services ($266.1 million). The decline in both cash receipts and cash payments related to the performance of contract drilling services reflects a reduction in contract drilling activity during the six-month period ended June 30, 2016, as well as our continuing efforts to control costs.
Capital Expenditures. We currently expect total capital expenditures for 2016 to aggregate approximately $650.0 million, including construction costs for the Ocean GreatWhite and our ongoing capital maintenance and replacement programs. As of June 30, 2016, we had incurred capital expenditures of $520.1 million during 2016, including accrued expenditures. See Contractual Cash Obligations Rig Construction.
Contractual Cash ObligationsRig Construction . Shipyard construction of the Ocean GreatWhite , a 10,000 foot dynamically positioned, harsh environment semisubmersible drilling rig, has been completed. In June 2016, we funded the final payment to HHI totaling $402.5 million in final settlement of the contract price for the Ocean GreatWhite , excluding $4.2 million in post-delivery items. The Ocean GreatWhite was delivered in mid-July 2016 and will be mobilized to Singapore for a rig enhancement project before placing the rig in service. We expect the project to be completed in the third quarter of 2016.
32
Contractual Cash ObligationsPressure Control by the Hour. During the first half of 2016, we executed three sale and leaseback transactions with respect to well control equipment on the Ocean BlackHawk, Ocean BlackHornet and Ocean BlackLion . Future commitments under the operating leases and contractual services agreements for these rigs are estimated to be approximately $49.0 million per year or an aggregate $491.0 million over the term of the agreements. We expect to complete the remaining sale and leaseback transaction for the Ocean BlackRhino in the third quarter of 2016. See Note 13 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
We had no other purchase obligations for major rig upgrades or any other significant obligations at June 30, 2016, except for those related to our direct rig operations, which arise during the normal course of business.
Other Obligations. As of June 30, 2016, the total unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions was $109.6 million. In addition, we have recorded a liability, as of June 30, 2016, for potential penalties and interest of $44.3 million and $3.9 million, respectively. Due to the high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of future cash outflows associated with the liabilities recognized in these balances, we are unable to make reasonably reliable estimates of the period of cash settlement with the respective taxing authorities.
Credit Agreement
At June 30, 2016, we had $327.3 million in short-term borrowings outstanding under our Credit Agreement, and we were in compliance with all covenants thereunder. As of July 27, 2016, we had $270.0 million in short-term borrowings outstanding and an additional $1.2 billion available under our Credit Agreement to provide short-term liquidity for our payment obligations.
Credit Ratings
In February 2016, Moodys Investors Service downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating to Ba2 from Baa2, with a stable outlook, and also downgraded our short-term credit rating to sub-prime. In July 2016, S&P Global Ratings (formerly Standard & Poors Ratings Services) downgraded our senior unsecured credit rating to BBB from BBB+; the outlook remains negative.
Market conditions and other factors, many of which are outside of our control, could cause our credit ratings to be lowered. A downgrade in our credit ratings could adversely impact our cost of issuing additional debt and the amount of additional debt that we could issue, and could further restrict our access to capital markets and our ability to raise additional debt. As a consequence, we may not be able to issue additional debt in amounts and/or with terms that we consider to be reasonable. One or more of these occurrences could limit our ability to pursue other business opportunities.
As a result of a downgrade in our short-term credit rating, we canceled our commercial paper program due to our inability to access the commercial paper market in the foreseeable future and no longer obtain a short-term credit rating from either rating agency.
Other Commercial CommitmentsLetters of Credit
We were contingently liable as of June 30, 2016 in the amount of $53.6 million under certain performance, bid, security, tax, supersedeas and customs bonds and letters of credit. Agreements relating to approximately $48.5 million of performance, tax, supersedeas, court and customs bonds can require collateral at any time. As of June 30, 2016, we had not been required to make any collateral deposits with respect to these agreements. The remaining agreements cannot require collateral except in events of default. Banks have issued letters of credit on our behalf securing certain of these bonds. The table below provides a list of these obligations in U.S. dollar equivalents and their time to expiration.
33
For the Years Ending December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2020 | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other Commercial Commitments |
||||||||||||||||||||
Performance bonds |
$ | 36,456 | $ | 2,000 | $ | 11,033 | $ | 4,298 | $ | 19,125 | ||||||||||
Supersedeas bond |
9,189 | 9,189 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Tax bond |
5,311 | 5,311 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other |
2,661 | 1,418 | 873 | 370 | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total obligations |
$ | 53,617 | $ | 17,918 | $ | 11,906 | $ | 4,668 | $ | 19,125 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had no off-balance sheet debt or other off-balance sheet arrangements.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 General Information to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this report for a discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Forward-Looking Statements
We or our representatives may, from time to time, either in this report, in periodic press releases or otherwise, make or incorporate by reference certain written or oral statements that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. All statements other than statements of historical fact are, or may be deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, without limitation, any statement that may project, indicate or imply future results, events, performance or achievements, and may contain or be identified by the words expect, intend, plan, predict, anticipate, estimate, believe, should, could, may, might, will, will be, will continue, will likely result, project, forecast, budget and similar expressions. In addition, any statement concerning future financial performance (including, without limitation, future revenues, earnings or growth rates), ongoing business strategies or prospects, and possible actions taken by or against us, which may be provided by management, are also forward-looking statements. Statements made by us in this report that contain forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations and statements about the following subjects:
| market conditions and the effect of such conditions on our future results of operations; |
| sources and uses of and requirements for financial resources and sources of liquidity; |
| contractual obligations and future contract negotiations; |
| interest rate and foreign exchange risk; |
| business strategy; |
| competitive position, including without limitation, competitive rigs entering the market; |
| expected financial position; |
| cash flows and contract backlog; |
| idling drilling rigs or reactivating stacked rigs; |
| declaration and payment of regular or special dividends; |
| financing plans; |
| market outlook; |
| tax planning; |
| debt levels and the impact of changes in the credit markets and credit ratings for our debt; |
| timing and duration of required regulatory inspections for our drilling rigs; |
| timing and cost of completion of rig upgrades, construction projects and other capital projects; |
| delivery dates and drilling contracts related to rig conversion or upgrade projects, construction projects, other capital projects or rig acquisitions; |
| scrapping retired rigs; |
| assets held for sale; |
34
| asset impairments and impairment evaluations; |
| outcomes of legal proceedings; |
| purchases of our securities; |
| compliance with applicable laws; and |
| availability, limits and adequacy of insurance or indemnification. |
These types of statements are based on current expectations about future events and inherently are subject to a variety of assumptions, risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expected, projected or expressed in forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, those described or referenced under Risk Factors in Item 1A.
The risks and uncertainties referenced above are not exhaustive. Other sections of this report and our other filings with the SEC include additional factors that could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial performance. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements included in this report speak only as of the date of this report. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in our expectations or beliefs with regard to the statement or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any forward-looking statement is based. In addition, in certain places in this report, we may refer to reports published by third parties that purport to describe trends or developments in energy production or drilling and exploration activity. We do so for the convenience of our investors and potential investors and in an effort to provide information available in the market intended to lead to a better understanding of the market environment in which we operate. We specifically disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such information and undertake no obligation to update such information.
ITEM 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
There were no material changes in our market risk components for the six months ended June 30, 2016. See Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk included in Item 7A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2015 for further information.
ITEM 4. | Controls and Procedures. |
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the federal securities laws, including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported on a timely basis. These disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us under the federal securities laws is accumulated and communicated to our management on a timely basis to allow decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, participated in an evaluation by our management of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of June 30, 2016. Based on their participation in that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2016.
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the foregoing evaluation that occurred during our second fiscal quarter of 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
35
ITEM 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
Information related to Item 1. Legal Proceedings is included in Note 10 to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this report.
ITEM 1A. | Risk Factors. |
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes a detailed discussion of certain material risk factors facing our company. No material changes have been made to such risk factors as of June 30, 2016.
ITEM 6. | Exhibits. |
See the Exhibit Index for a list of those exhibits filed or furnished herewith.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. | ||||||
(Registrant) | ||||||
Date August 1, 2016 | By: | /s/ Kelly Youngblood | ||||
Kelly Youngblood | ||||||
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
Date August 1, 2016 | /s/ Beth G. Gordon | |||||
Beth G. Gordon | ||||||
Controller (Chief Accounting Officer) |
36
37
Exhibit 10.1
SEVERANCE AGREEMENT
THIS SEVERANCE AGREEMENT (together with its Exhibit, this Agreement ) is made as of May 2, 2016 (the Effective Date ), by and between Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., a Delaware corporation (together with its successors and assigns, the Company ), and Kelly Youngblood (the Executive , and, together with the Company, a Party ).
W I T N E S S E T H :
WHEREAS, the Company wishes to employ the Executive as its Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and the Executive wishes to accept and begin such employment, and in connection therewith the Parties agree to the terms and conditions set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the promises and covenants herein, the Parties agree as follows:
1. | Termination by the Company Without Cause; Termination by the Executive for Good Reason. |
(a) | In the event that the Executives employment with the Company is terminated during the term of this Agreement (the Term ) (1) by the Company other than for Permanent Disability (as defined below) or for Cause (as defined below) or (2) by the Executive for Good Reason (as defined below), the Company shall provide the Executive with the following (in lieu of separation payments under any other Company severance plan, policy or arrangement): |
(i) | Unpaid base salary through the date the employment of the Executive terminates (the Termination Date ), paid no later than the next following payment date in accordance with the Companys normal payroll payment practices. |
(ii) | Other or additional benefits in accordance with the then-applicable terms of any applicable plan, program, corporate governance document, policy, agreement or other arrangement of the Company or any of its subsidiaries Company Arrangements ); provided , however, that this shall not result in a duplication of benefits or payments to the Executive or his beneficiaries, as the case may be. |
(iii) | Subject to Section 1(c), separation payments at a rate of $55,000 per month for a period of 12 months, commencing with the month following the month in which the Revocation Period as defined in the release referred to in Section 1(c) ends (and thereafter on the first Company payroll date of each month), but subject to deferral as provided in Section 3 hereof. |
1
(iv) | Subject to Section 1(c), the Executive and his dependents shall be entitled to continued participation (at the Companys expense), for a period of 12 months following the Termination Date (which shall be concurrent with any health care continuation benefits under COBRA), in the group medical plan of the Company in which they were participating as of such date. |
(b) | For purposes of this Agreement: |
(i) | Permanent Disability shall mean that the Executive has been unable, due to physical or mental incapacity, to substantially perform his job duties and responsibilities for the Company for 90 days out of any 180 consecutive days. |
(ii) | Cause shall mean that: (1) the Executive is convicted of, or pleads guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony, (2) the Executive engages in conduct that constitutes either (x) a material and willful breach of the Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or any other policy applicable to employees of the Company, (y) willful, or reckless, material misconduct in the performance of the Executives duties, or (z) willful, habitual neglect of the Executives material duties; provided , however, that for purposes of clauses (2)(y) and (2)(z) of this paragraph, Cause shall not include any act or omission believed by the Executive in good faith to have been in or not opposed to the interest of the Company (without any intent by the Executive to gain, directly or indirectly, a profit to which he is not legally entitled). |
(iii) | Good Reason shall mean the occurrence of any of the following events, without the Executives prior written consent and without cure by the Company within 30 days after the Executive gives notice of such event to the Company requesting cure, such notice to be given within 90 days after the Executive learns that such event has occurred: (1) the assignment to the Executive of duties that are materially inconsistent with his position (including his status, offices, titles and reporting relationships), authority, duties or responsibilities, all as in effect on the Effective Date; (2) actions by the Company that have resulted in a substantial diminution in his position, authority, duties or responsibilities as compared to his position, authority, duties or responsibilities at the Effective Date; (3) any failure to elect or appoint the Executive as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company or to maintain him in such position throughout the Term; (4) any reduction in Base Salary or target Annual Bonus opportunity from the amounts in effect on the Effective Date; or (5) any failure of the Company to obtain the assumption in writing of its obligation to perform this Agreement by any successor to all or substantially all of the business or assets of the Company within 15 calendar days after a merger, consolidation, sale or similar transaction. |
2
(c) | Upon termination of his employment hereunder in a termination governed by this Section 1, the Executive shall be entitled to the benefits described in Section 1(a)(iii) and (iv) only if he executes, and delivers to the Company within 21 days after the Termination Date, a valid Release substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (as such form may be changed by Company as shall be necessary to render such form valid, binding and enforceable under then-current applicable law), which Release he does not revoke during the Revocation Period as defined in such Release. |
2. | Term of Agreement. The Term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall expire one year after the Effective Date. Should Executive remain in the employ of Company (or any affiliate) beyond the Term, Executive will be deemed an at will employee and, accordingly, Executives employment may be terminated at any time for any reason or no reason. |
3. | Section 409A. |
(a) | It is the Parties intention that all payments, benefits and entitlements received by the Executive under this Agreement be provided in a manner that does not impose any additional taxes, interest or penalties on the Executive with respect to such payments, benefits and entitlements under Section 409A of the Code, and its implementing regulations ( Section 409A ), and the provisions of this Agreement shall be construed and administered in accordance with such intent. Each of the Parties has used, and will continue to use, its best reasonable efforts to avoid the imposition of such additional taxes, interest or penalties, and the Parties agree to work together in good faith to amend this Agreement, and to structure any payment, benefit or other entitlement received by the Executive, in a manner that avoids imposition of such additional taxes, interest or penalties while preserving the affected payment, benefit or entitlement to the maximum extent practicable and maintaining the basic financial provisions of this Agreement without violating any applicable requirement of Section 409A. For purposes of this Agreement, Code shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and any reference to a particular section of the Code shall include any provision that modifies, replaces or supersedes such section. |
(b) |
All payments to be made to the Executive hereunder, to the extent they constitute a deferral of compensation subject to the requirements of Section 409A (after taking into account all exclusions applicable to such payments under Section 409A), shall be made no later, and shall not be made any earlier, than at the time or times specified herein for such payments to be made, except as otherwise permitted or required under Section 409A. The date of the Executives separation from service, as defined in Section 409A (and as determined by applying the default presumptions in Treas. Reg. §1.409A-1(h)(1)(ii)), shall be |
3
treated as the date of the Executives termination of employment for purposes of determining the time of payment of any amount that becomes payable to the Executive hereunder upon the Executives termination of employment and that is properly treated as a deferral of compensation subject to Section 409A after taking into account all exclusions applicable to such payment under Section 409A. In addition, no such payment or distribution of deferred compensation shall be made to the Executive prior to the earlier of (a) the expiration of the six (6) month period measured from the date of the Executives separation from service, or (b) the date of the Executives death, if the Executive is deemed at the time of such separation from service to be a specified employee within the meaning of Section 409A and if such delayed commencement is otherwise required to avoid additional tax under Section 409A(a)(2) of the Code. All payments and benefits that are delayed pursuant to the immediately preceding sentence shall be paid to the Executive in a lump sum upon the first business day immediately following the earlier of (x) the expiration of such six (6) month period or (y) the Executives date of death, without interest. Each individual installment payment that becomes payable under this Agreement, including each payment under Section 1(a)(iii), shall be treated as a right to receive a series of separate payments for purposes of Section 409A and Treasury Reg. §1.409A-2(b)(2)(iii). To the extent that the payment or reimbursement of any expense or the provision of any in-kind benefits under this Agreement would be considered deferred compensation under Section 409A (after taking into account all exclusions applicable to such reimbursements and benefits under Section 409A): (i) the payment or reimbursement of such expenses or the provision of in-kind benefits in one of the Executives taxable years shall not affect the payment or reimbursement of any expense or payment of in-kind benefits in any other taxable year of the Executive; (ii) any payment or reimbursement for expenses under this Agreement shall be made in accordance with the Companys applicable plans and policies as soon as soon as administratively practicable after such expense has been incurred, but in any event on or before the last day of the Executives taxable year following the taxable year in which the expense was incurred; and (iii) any such payment or reimbursement or in-kind benefit may not be liquidated or exchanged for any other benefit. |
4. | Severability. Each of the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed severable in whole and in part. To the extent that any provision or portion of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, in whole or in part, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect so as to achieve the intentions of the Parties, as set forth in this Agreement, to the maximum extent possible. |
5. | Assignment. |
(a) | This Agreement shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the Parties and their respective successors, heirs (in the case of the Executive) and assigns. |
4
(b) | No rights or obligations of the Company under this Agreement may be assigned or transferred by the Company except that such rights and obligations may be assigned or transferred pursuant to a merger, consolidation or other combination in which the Company is not the continuing entity, or a sale or liquidation of all or substantially all of the business and assets of the Company, provided that the assignee or transferee is the successor to all or substantially all of the business and assets of the Company and such assignee or transferee expressly assumes the liabilities, obligations and duties of the Company as set forth in this Agreement. |
(c) | No rights or obligations of the Executive under this Agreement may be assigned or transferred by the Executive other than his rights to compensation and benefits, which may be transferred only by will or by operation of law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Executive shall be entitled, to the extent permitted under applicable law and applicable Company Arrangements, to select and change a beneficiary or beneficiaries to receive any compensation or benefit hereunder following the Executives death by giving written notice thereof to the Company. In the event of the Executives death or a judicial determination of his incompetence, references in this Agreement to the Executive shall be deemed, where appropriate, to refer to his beneficiary, estate or other legal representative. In the event that Executive dies before all payments he may be entitled to have been paid, all remaining payments shall be made to the beneficiary specifically designated by the Executive in writing prior to his death, or, if no such beneficiary was designated (or the Company is unable in good faith to determine the beneficiary designated), to his personal representative or estate. |
6. | Miscellaneous. |
(a) | This Agreement shall be governed, interpreted, performed and enforced in accordance with its express terms, and otherwise in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas (without regard to choice of law or conflict of laws principles), to the extent not displaced by federal law. |
(b) | Except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, this Agreement contains the entire agreement of the Parties with regard to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, written or oral, with respect to such subject matter. |
(c) |
No provision in this Agreement may be amended unless such amendment is set forth in a writing that expressly refers to the provision of this Agreement that is being amended and that is signed by the Executive and by an authorized officer of the Company. No waiver by any Party of any breach of any condition or provision contained in this Agreement shall be deemed a waiver of any similar or dissimilar condition or provision at the same or any prior or subsequent time. To be effective, any waiver must be set forth in a writing signed by the waiving Party and must specifically refer to the condition(s) or provision(s) of this Agreement being waived. In the event of any conflict between any provision of this |
5
Agreement and any provision of any Company Arrangement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control unless the Executive otherwise agrees in a writing that expressly refers to the provision of this Agreement whose control he is waiving. |
(d) | All numbers and headings contained in this Agreement are for reference only and are not intended to qualify, limit or otherwise affect the meaning or interpretation of any provision contained in this Agreement. When used in this Agreement, (i) the words hereof, herein, hereto and hereunder and words of similar import shall refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this Agreement unless otherwise indicated, (ii) the terms defined in the singular shall have a comparable meaning when used in the plural, and vice versa, and (iii) the term including shall mean including, without limitation and the term includes shall mean includes, without limitation. |
7. | Notices. Any notice, consent, demand, request, or other communication given to a Party in connection with this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been given to such Party (x) when delivered personally to such Party or (y), provided that a written acknowledgment of receipt is obtained, five days after being sent by prepaid certified or registered mail, or two days after being sent by a nationally recognized overnight courier, to the address (if any) specified below for such Party (or to such other address as such Party shall have specified by 10 days advance notice given in accordance with this Section 7) or (z) on the first business day after it is sent by facsimile to the facsimile number (if any) set forth below (or to such other facsimile number as shall have specified by 10 days advance notice given in accordance with this Section 7), with a confirmatory copy sent by certified or registered mail or by overnight courier in accordance with this Section 7. |
If to the Company:
Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.
15415 Katy Freeway, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77094
Attn: Corporate Secretary
If to the Executive:
The address of his principal residence as it appears in the Companys records, with a copy to him (during the Term) at his office in Houston, Texas.
8. | Arbitration of All Disputes. Any claim, demand, request, investigation, dispute, controversy, threat, discovery request, or request for testimony or information (collectively, Claim ) between the Executive and the Company or any of its subsidiaries, including any Claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, any other agreement or arrangement between the Executive and the Company or any of its subsidiaries, the Executives employment with the Company, or any termination thereof shall be resolved |
6
by binding confidential arbitration, to be held in Houston Texas, in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules (and not the National Rules for Resolution of Employment Disputes) of the American Arbitration Association and this Section 8. Judgment upon the award rendered by the arbitrator(s) may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. |
9. | Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original copy of this Agreement and all of which, when taken together, shall be deemed to constitute one and the same agreement. Signatures delivered by facsimile shall be deemed effective for all purposes. |
IN WITNESS WHEREOF , the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. | ||
By: | /s/ Marc Edwards | |
Name: Marc Edwards | ||
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
EXECUTIVE: |
/s/ Kelly Youngblood |
Kelly Youngblood |
7
EXHIBIT A
FORM OF RELEASE
THIS RELEASE OF CLAIMS (this Release ) is entered into as of [the date the Executive signs this Release] (the Release Date ), by and between Kelly Youngblood (the Executive ) and Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (the Company ). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Severance Agreement by and between the Company and the Executive, dated as of May 2, 2016 (the Severance Agreement ).
1. Release .
(a) The Executive, on behalf of himself and his beneficiaries, estate and legal representatives (collectively, with the Executive, the Executive Releasors ) hereby releases, acquits and forever discharges the Company, its parents, subsidiaries, and each of their respective successors, assigns, officers, directors, and employees (collectively, the Company Released Parties ) from any and all claims, causes of actions, demands, suits, costs, expenses and damages of whatsoever nature and kind, whether known or unknown, whether now existing or hereafter arising, at law or in equity, that any Executive Releasor may have, or may have had, or may hereafter have, and that are based in whole or in part on facts, whether or not now known, existing prior to the Release Date, and that arise out of or relate to the Executives employment with or services for the Company or its subsidiaries, or the termination of such employment or services, other than the right to payment or benefits under Sections 1(a)(iii) and 1(a)(iv) of the Severance Agreement, for which execution of this Release is, in part, a condition precedent. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this release does not apply (i) to any vested benefits under any benefits plan, program, policies or agreements of the Company or any of its affiliates which the Executive may have as may be in effect from time to time; (ii) to the Executives right to obtain contribution as permitted by law in the event of any judgment against the Executive as a result of any act or failure to act for which the Executive and the Company (or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates) are held jointly liable; (iii) to any rights the Executive holds as an individual stockholder of the Company; (iv) to any claim that cannot be waived by law; (v) to the Executives right to enforce the terms of this Release; and (vi) to any right or claim that arises after the date of the execution of this Release.
(b) The claims released by the Executive include, to the extent set forth in Section 1(a), any and all claims under federal, state or local laws pertaining to employment, including the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e et seq., the Fair Labor Standards Act as amended, 29 U.S.C. Section 201 et seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq., the Reconstruction Era Civil Rights Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 1981 et seq., the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. Section 701 et seq., the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1992, 29 U.S.C. Section 2601 et seq., the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as amended, the Dodd-Frank Act, as amended and any and all state or local laws regarding employment discrimination and/or U.S. federal, state or local laws of any type or description regarding employment, including any claims in any way arising from or derivative of the Executives employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries or the termination of such employment, as well as any claims under state contract or tort law or otherwise.
2. Representation by the Executive . The Executive represents that he has not been convicted of, or pleaded guilty to or nolo contendere to, any felony and has not engaged in conduct that constitutes Cause under the Severance Agreement.
3. Incorporation of Specific Provisions . Sections 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the Severance Agreement shall be deemed incorporated by reference in this Release and shall be treated as if set forth in full herein, except that references in them to this Agreement shall be deemed to be references to this Release.
4. Review and Revocation Period . The Executive hereby represents that he has read this Release carefully and fully understands the terms hereof, and that he has been advised to consult with an attorney and has had the opportunity to consult with an attorney prior to signing this Release. The Executive acknowledges that he is executing this Release voluntarily and knowingly, without duress or coercion, and that he has not relied on any representations, promises or agreements of any kind, other than those set forth in this Release. The Executive further represents that he has had 21 days to review this Release. If the Executive has executed this Release in fewer than 21 days after its delivery, the Executive hereby acknowledges that his decision to execute this Release prior to the expiration of such 21-day period was entirely voluntary. The Executive may revoke his acceptance of this Release within seven days after he has signed it and delivered it to the Company (the Revocation Period ) by sending written notice to the Company that the Executive wishes to revoke his acceptance of it and not be bound by it. If the Executive timely revokes this Release, the Company shall have no obligation to provide to the Executive the benefits described or referenced in Sections 1(a)(iii) and 1(a)(iv) of the Severance Agreement. This Release shall become effective on the seventh (7 th ) day after the Executive signs it unless revoked in accordance with the procedure set forth in the prior sentence. This Release shall be null and void if not countersigned by the Company, and delivered to the Executive, within seven days after the expiration of the Revocation Period.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Release as of the date and year first above written.
DIAMOND OFFSHORE DRILLING, INC. | ||
By: | /s/ Marc Edwards | |
Name: Marc Edwards | ||
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
EXECUTIVE: | ||
/s/ Kelly Youngblood | ||
Kelly Youngblood | ||
Date Signed: |
Exhibit 31.1
I, Marc Edwards, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. | The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 1, 2016
/s/ Marc Edwards |
Marc Edwards Chief Executive Officer |
Exhibit 31.2
I, Kelly Youngblood, certify that:
1. | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc.; |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. | The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 1, 2016
/s/ Kelly Youngblood |
Kelly Youngblood Chief Financial Officer |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, in his capacity as an officer of Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc. (the Company ), that, to his knowledge:
(1) the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report ), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: August 1, 2016
/s/ Marc Edwards |
Marc Edwards Chief Executive Officer of the Company |
/s/ Kelly Youngblood |
Kelly Youngblood |
Chief Financial Officer of the Company |