RISK FACTORS

Before deciding to participate in the exchange offer, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all other information contained in this prospectus. The following are some of the important factors that could affect our financial performance or could cause actual results to differ materially from estimates or expectations contained in our forward-looking statements. We may encounter risks in addition to those described below. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us, or that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also impair or adversely affect our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

The risk factors in this prospectus are grouped into the following categories:

Risks Relating to Our Financial Matters

Our existing level of cash resources, negative operating cash flow and significant debt could cause us to have inadequate liquidity and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and prospects.

As of September 30, 2016, we had zero cash and cash equivalents, approximately $325.6 million of current restricted cash and $11.3 billion of long-term debt outstanding (before premium and net of unamortized debt issuance costs), including zero outstanding under the 2015 Credit Facilities. We incur, and will incur, significant interest expense relating to the assets at the Liquefaction Project, and we anticipate needing to incur substantial additional debt to finance the construction of Train 6 of the Liquefaction Project. Our ability to fund our capital expenditures and refinance our indebtedness will depend on our ability to access additional project financing as well as the debt and equity capital markets. A variety of factors beyond our control could impact the availability or cost of capital, including domestic or international economic conditions, increases in key benchmark interest rates and/or credit spreads, the adoption of new or amended banking or capital market laws or regulations and the re-pricing of market risks and volatility in capital and financial markets. Our financing costs could increase or future borrowings may be unavailable to us or unsuccessful, which could cause us to be unable to pay or refinance our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. We also rely on borrowings under our credit facilities to fund our capital expenditures. If any of the lenders in the syndicates backing these facilities was unable to perform on its commitments, we may need to seek replacement financing, which may not be available as needed, or may be available in more limited amounts or on more expensive or otherwise unfavorable terms.

We have not been profitable historically. We may not achieve profitability or generate positive operating cash flow in the future.

We had net losses of $265.6 million, $376.9 million and $194.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and a net loss of $238.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. In addition, we have never had positive operating cash flow. In the future, we may incur operating losses and experience negative operating cash flow. We may not be able to reduce costs, increase revenues, or reduce our debt service obligations sufficiently to maintain our cash resources, which could cause us to have inadequate liquidity to continue our business.

We will continue to incur significant capital and operating expenditures while we develop and construct the Liquefaction Project. Any delays beyond the expected development period for our Trains could cause, and could

18

Table of Contents

increase the level of, our operating losses. Our future liquidity may also be affected by the timing of construction financing availability in relation to the incurrence of construction costs and other outflows and by the timing of receipt of cash flows under SPAs in relation to the incurrence of project and operating expenses. Moreover, many factors (including factors beyond our control) could result in a disparity between liquidity sources and cash needs, including factors such as construction delays and breaches of agreements. Our ability to generate any significant positive operating cash flow and achieve profitability in the future is dependent on our ability to successfully and timely complete the applicable Train.

Our ability to generate cash is substantially dependent upon the performance by customers under long-term contracts that we have entered into, and we could be materially and adversely affected if any customer fails to perform its contractual obligations for any reason.

Our future results and liquidity are substantially dependent on the performance, upon satisfaction of the conditions precedent to payment thereunder, by six third-party customers that have entered into SPAs with us and agreed to pay an aggregate of $2.9 billion annually in fixed fees. We are dependent on each customer’s continued willingness and ability to perform its obligations under its SPA. We are exposed to the credit risk of any guarantor of these customers’ obligations under their respective SPA in the event that we must seek recourse under a guaranty. If any customer fails to perform its obligations under its SPA, our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects could be materially and adversely affected, even if we were ultimately successful in seeking damages from that customer or its guarantor for a breach of the SPA.

Each of our customer contracts is subject to termination under certain circumstances.

Each of our SPAs contains various termination rights allowing our customers to terminate their SPAs, including, without limitation: (1) upon the occurrence of certain events of force majeure; (2) if we fail to make available specified scheduled cargo quantities; and (3) delays in the commencement of commercial operations. We may not be able to replace these SPAs on desirable terms, or at all, if they are terminated.

Our use of hedging arrangements may adversely affect our future operating results or liquidity.

To reduce our exposure to fluctuations in the price, volume and timing risk associated with the purchase of natural gas, we use futures, swaps and option contracts traded or cleared on the Intercontinental Exchange and the New York Mercantile Exchange, or over-the-counter options and swaps with other natural gas merchants and financial institutions. Hedging arrangements would expose us to risk of financial loss in some circumstances, including when:

The use of derivatives also may require the posting of cash collateral with counterparties, which can impact working capital when commodity prices change.

The swaps regulatory and other provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and the rules adopted thereunder and other regulations could adversely affect our ability to hedge risks associated with our business and our operating results and cash flows.

Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) establishes federal regulation of the over-the-counter (“OTC”) derivatives market and has made other amendments to the Commodity Exchange Act that are relevant to our business. The provisions of Title VII of the

19

Table of Contents

Dodd-Frank Act and the rules adopted thereunder by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), the SEC and other federal regulators may adversely affect our ability to manage certain of our risks on a cost effective basis. Such laws and regulations may also adversely affect our ability to execute our strategies with respect to hedging our exposure to variability in expected future cash flows attributable to the future sale of our LNG inventory and to price risk attributable to future purchases of natural gas to be utilized as fuel to operate our LNG terminals and to secure natural gas feedstock for our liquefaction facilities.

The CFTC has proposed position limits rules that would modify and expand the applicability of position limits on the amounts of certain futures contracts and options thereon, as well as economically equivalent swaps for or linked to certain physical commodities, including Henry Hub natural gas, that market participants may hold, subject to limited exemptions for certain bona fide hedging positions and other types of transactions. Under the CFTC’s proposed rules regarding aggregation of positions, a party that controls the trading of, or owns 10% or more of the equity interests in, another party will have to aggregate the positions of the controlled or owned party with its own positions for purposes of determining compliance with position limits unless an exemption applies. Bona fide hedging positions with respect to commercial physical commodity activities would be exempted from position limits under the CFTC’s proposed rules, but the proposal would narrow the definition of “bona fide hedging position” in certain ways that could limit our ability to claim a hedging exemption in connection with our commercial activities. It is uncertain at this time whether, when and in what form the CFTC’s proposed new position limits and aggregation rules may become final and effective.

Under the Dodd-Frank Act and the rules adopted thereunder, we may be required to clear through a derivatives clearing organization any swaps into which we enter that fall within a class of swaps designated by the CFTC for mandatory clearing and we could have to execute trades in such swaps on certain trading platforms or exchanges. The CFTC has designated four classes of interest rate swaps (denominated in several currencies) and two classes of index credit default swaps for mandatory clearing, but has not yet proposed rules designating any physical commodity swaps, for mandatory clearing or mandatory exchange trading. Although we expect to qualify for the end-user exception from the mandatory clearing and trade execution requirements for our swaps entered into to hedge our commercial risks, if we fail to qualify for that exception as to any swap we enter into and have to clear that swap through a derivatives clearing organization, we could be required to post margin with respect to such swap, our cost of entering into and maintaining such swap could increase and we would not enjoy the same flexibility with the cleared swaps that we enjoy with the uncleared OTC swaps we enter into. Moreover, the application of the mandatory clearing and trade execution requirements to other market participants, such as swap dealers, may change the cost and availability of the swaps that we use for hedging.

As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFTC and the federal banking regulators have adopted rules requiring certain market participants to collect and post initial and variation margin with respect to uncleared swaps from their counterparties that are financial end users and certain registered swap dealers and major swap participants. The requirements of those rules began to be phased in on September 1, 2016. Although we believe we will qualify as a non-financial end user for purposes of these rules, were we not to do so and have to post margin as to our uncleared swaps in the future, our cost of entering into and maintaining swaps would be increased. Our counterparties that are subject to the regulations imposing the Basel III capital requirements on them may increase the cost to us of entering into swaps with them or, although not required to collect margin from us under the margin rules, require us to post collateral with them in connection with such swaps in order to offset their increased capital costs or to reduce their capital costs to maintain those swaps on their balance sheets.

The Dodd-Frank Act also imposes other regulatory requirements on swaps market participants, including end users of swaps, such as regulations relating to swap documentation, reporting and recordkeeping, and certain business conduct rules applicable to swap dealers and major swap participants. Together with the Basel III capital requirements on certain swaps market participants, these regulations could significantly increase the cost of derivative contracts (including through requirements to post margin or collateral), materially alter the terms of derivative contracts, reduce the availability of derivatives to protect against certain risks that we encounter and reduce our ability to monetize or restructure our existing derivative contracts and to execute our hedging

20

Table of Contents

strategies. If, as a result of the swaps regulatory regime discussed above, we were to reduce our use of swaps to hedge our risks, such as commodity price risks that we encounter in our operations, our operating results and cash flows may become more volatile and could be otherwise adversely affected.

We expect that our hedging activities will remain subject to significant and developing regulations and regulatory oversight. However, the full impact of the various U.S. (and non-U.S.) regulatory developments in connection with these activities will not be known with certainty until such derivatives market regulations are fully implemented and related market practices and structures are fully developed.

Risks Relating to the Completion of our Liquefaction Facilities

and the Development and Operation of our Business

Operation of the Liquefaction Project involves significant risks.

As more fully discussed in these Risk Factors, the Liquefaction Project faces operational risks, including the following:

We may not be successful in fully implementing our proposed business strategy to provide liquefaction capabilities at the Sabine Pass LNG terminal adjacent to the existing regasification facilities.

It will take several years to construct the Liquefaction Project, and even if successfully constructed, the Liquefaction Project would be subject to the operating risks described herein. Accordingly, there are many risks associated with the Liquefaction Project, and if we are not successful in implementing our business strategy, we may not be able to generate cash flows, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity and prospects.

Cost overruns and delays in the completion of one or more Trains, as well as difficulties in obtaining sufficient financing to pay for such costs and delays, could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest on, premium, if any, and principal of the New Notes.

The actual construction costs of the Trains may be significantly higher than our current estimates as a result of many factors, including change orders under existing or future EPC contracts resulting from the occurrence of certain specified events that may give Bechtel the right to cause us to enter into change orders or resulting from changes with which we otherwise agree. We have already experienced increased costs due to change orders. See “Description of Principal Project Documents—EPC Contract (Trains 1 and 2)”, “—EPC Contract (Trains 3 and 4)” and “—EPC Contract (Train 5).” We do not have any prior experience in constructing liquefaction facilities, and other than Trains 1 and 2 of the Liquefaction Project, no liquefaction facilities have been constructed and placed in service in the United States in over 40 years. As construction progresses, we may decide or be forced to submit change orders to our contractor that could result in longer construction periods, higher construction costs or both, including change orders to comply with existing or future environmental or other regulations.

21

Table of Contents

Delays in the construction of one or more Trains beyond the estimated development periods, as well as change orders to the EPC contracts with Bechtel or any future EPC contract related to additional Trains, could increase the cost of completion beyond the amounts that we estimate, which could require us to obtain additional sources of financing to fund our operations until the Liquefaction Project is fully constructed (which could cause further delays). Our ability to obtain financing that may be needed to provide additional funding to cover increased costs will depend, in part, on factors beyond our control. Accordingly, we may not be able to obtain financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. Even if we are able to obtain financing, we may have to accept terms that are disadvantageous to us or that may have a material adverse effect on our current or future business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Delays in the completion of one or more Trains could lead to reduced revenues or termination of one or more of the SPAs by our counterparties.

Any delay in completion of a Train could cause a delay in the receipt of revenues projected therefrom, or cause a loss of one or more customers in the event of significant delays. In particular, each of our SPAs provides that the counterparty may terminate that SPA if the relevant Train does not timely commence commercial operations. As a result, any significant construction delay, whatever the cause, could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Our ability to complete development of Train 6 will be contingent on our ability to obtain additional funding. If we are unable to obtain sufficient funding, we may be unable to fully execute our business strategy.

We will require significant additional funding to be able to commence construction of Train 6, which we may not be able to obtain at a cost that results in positive economics, or at all. The inability to achieve acceptable funding may cause a delay in the development of Train 6, and we may not be able to complete our business plan. Even if we are able to obtain funding, the funding may be inadequate to cover any increases in costs or delays in completion of Train 6, which may cause a delay in the receipt of revenues projected therefrom or cause a loss of one or more future customers in the event of significant delays. As a result, any significant construction delay, whatever the cause, could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Hurricanes or other disasters could result in an interruption of our operations, a delay in the completion of the Liquefaction Project, higher construction costs, and the deferral of the dates on which payments are due to us under the SPAs, all of which could adversely affect us.

In August and September of 2005, Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, respectively, damaged coastal and inland areas located in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama, resulting in the temporary suspension of construction of the Sabine Pass LNG terminal. In September 2008, Hurricane Ike struck the Texas and Louisiana coast, and the Sabine Pass LNG terminal experienced minor damage.

Future storms and related storm activity and collateral effects, or other disasters such as explosions, fires, floods or accidents, could result in damage to, or interruption of operations at, the Sabine Pass LNG terminal or related infrastructure, as well as delays or cost increases in the construction and the development of the Liquefaction Project and related infrastructure. Changes in the global climate may have significant physical effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods, and rising sea levels; if any such effects were to occur, they could have an adverse effect on our coastal operations.

22

Table of Contents

Failure to obtain and maintain approvals and permits from governmental and regulatory agencies with respect to the design, construction and operation of the Liquefaction Project could impede operations and construction and could have a material adverse effect on us.

The design, construction and operation of our liquefaction facilities and the export of LNG are highly regulated activities. Approvals of the United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) and the United States Department of Energy (“DOE”) under Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act of 1938, as amended (the “NGA”), as well as several other material governmental and regulatory approvals and permits, including several under the Clean Air Act (the “CAA”) and the Clean Water Act (the “CWA”), are required in order to construct and operate an LNG facility and export LNG. Although the FERC has issued orders under Section 3 of the NGA authorizing the siting, construction and operation of six Trains, the FERC orders require us to comply with certain ongoing conditions and obtain certain additional approvals in conjunction with ongoing construction and operations of the Liquefaction Project. We also have a pending application with the DOE for authorization to export LNG to non-FTA countries in addition to the orders previously granted to us by the DOE. We will be required to obtain similar approvals and permits with respect to any expansion or modification of our liquefaction facilities. We cannot control the outcome of the FERC’s or the DOE’s review and approval processes. Certain of these governmental permits, approvals and authorizations are or may be subject to rehearing requests, appeals and other challenges.

Authorizations obtained from the FERC, DOE and other federal and state regulatory agencies also contain ongoing conditions, and additional approval and permit requirements may be imposed. We do not know whether or when any such approvals or permits can be obtained, or whether any existing or potential interventions or other actions by third parties will interfere with our ability to obtain and maintain such permits or approvals. If we are unable to obtain and maintain the necessary approvals and permits, including as a result of untimely notices or filings, we may not be able to recover our investment in the Liquefaction Project. There is no assurance that we will obtain and maintain these governmental permits, approvals and authorizations, or that we will be able to obtain them on a timely basis, and failure to obtain and maintain any of these permits, approvals or authorizations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity and prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

We are entirely dependent on Cheniere and Cheniere Partners, including employees of Cheniere and its subsidiaries, for key personnel, and a loss of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business.

As of December 31, 2016, Cheniere and its subsidiaries had approximately 900 full-time employees, including approximately 300 employees who directly supported the Liquefaction Project. We have contracted with subsidiaries of Cheniere and Cheniere Partners to provide the personnel necessary for the construction and operation of the Liquefaction Project. We depend on Cheniere’s subsidiaries hiring and retaining personnel sufficient to provide support for the Liquefaction Project. Cheniere competes with other liquefaction projects in the United States and globally, other energy companies and other employers to attract and retain qualified personnel with the technical skills and experience required to construct and operate liquefaction facilities and pipelines and to provide our customers with the highest quality service. We also compete with any other project Cheniere is developing, including the natural gas liquefaction facility it is developing and constructing near Corpus Christi, Texas, for the time and expertise of Cheniere’s personnel. Further, we and Cheniere face competition for these highly skilled employees in the immediate vicinity of the Sabine Pass LNG terminal and more generally from the Gulf Coast hydrocarbon processing and construction industries.

Our executive officers are officers and employees of Cheniere and its affiliates. We do not maintain key person life insurance policies on any personnel, and we do not have any employment contracts or other agreements with key personnel binding them to provide services for any particular term. The loss of the services of any of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, our future success will depend in part on our ability to engage, and Cheniere’s ability to attract and retain, additional qualified personnel.

23

Table of Contents

A shortage in the labor pool of skilled workers or other general inflationary pressures or changes in applicable laws and regulations could make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and could require an increase in the wage and benefits packages that are offered, thereby increasing our operating costs Any increase in our operating costs could materially and adversely affect our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, and prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

A major health and safety incident relating to our business could be costly in terms of potential liabilities and reputational damage.

Health and safety performance is critical to the success of all areas of our business. Any failure in health and safety performance may result in personal harm or injury, penalties for non-compliance with relevant regulatory requirements or litigation, and a failure that results in a significant health and safety incident is likely to be costly in terms of potential liabilities. Such a failure could generate public concern and have a corresponding impact on our reputation and our relationships with relevant regulatory agencies and local communities, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

We have numerous contractual and commercial relationships, and conflicts of interest, with Cheniere and its affiliates, including Cheniere Marketing.

We have agreements to compensate and to reimburse expenses of affiliates of Cheniere. In addition, we have a TUA with SPLNG under which SPLNG derives economic benefits, we have entered into a transportation agreement with a subsidiary of Cheniere Partners to transport natural gas to the Liquefaction Project and Cheniere Marketing has entered into an SPA with us to purchase, at Cheniere Marketing’s option, any LNG produced by us in excess of that required for other customers. All of these agreements involve conflicts of interest between us, on the one hand, and Cheniere and its other affiliates, on the other hand. In addition, Cheniere is currently developing and constructing a natural gas liquefaction facility near Corpus Christi, Texas and has entered into eight third-party SPAs for the sale of LNG from this natural gas liquefaction facility, and may continue to enter into commercial arrangements with respect to this liquefaction facility that might otherwise have been entered into with respect to Train 6.

We expect that there will be additional agreements or arrangements with Cheniere and its affiliates, including future transportation, interconnection and gas balancing agreements with one or more Cheniere-affiliated natural gas pipelines as well as other agreements and arrangements that cannot now be anticipated. In those circumstances where additional contracts with Cheniere and its affiliates may be necessary or desirable, additional conflicts of interest will be involved.

We are dependent on Cheniere and its affiliates to provide services to us. If Cheniere or its affiliates are unable or unwilling to perform according to the negotiated terms and timetable of their respective agreement for any reason or terminate their agreement, we would be required to engage a substitute service provider. This could result in a significant interference with operations and increased costs.

We are dependent on Bechtel and other contractors for the successful completion of the Liquefaction Project.

Timely and cost-effective completion of the Liquefaction Project in compliance with agreed specifications is central to our business strategy and is highly dependent on the performance of Bechtel and our other contractors under their agreements. The ability of Bechtel and our other contractors to perform successfully under their agreements is dependent on a number of factors, including their ability to:

24

Table of Contents

Although some agreements may provide for liquidated damages if the contractor fails to perform in the manner required with respect to certain of its obligations, the events that trigger a requirement to pay liquidated damages may delay or impair the operation of the Liquefaction Project, and any liquidated damages that we receive may not be sufficient to cover the damages that we suffer as a result of any such delay or impairment. The obligations of Bechtel and our other contractors to pay liquidated damages under their agreements are subject to caps on liability, as set forth therein. See “Description of Principal Project Documents—EPC Contract (Trains 1 and 2)”, “—EPC Contract (Trains 3 and 4)” and “—EPC Contract (Train 5).” Furthermore, we may have disagreements with our contractors about different elements of the construction process, which could lead to the assertion of rights and remedies under their contracts and increase the cost of the Liquefaction Project or result in a contractor’s unwillingness to perform further work on the Liquefaction Project. If any contractor is unable or unwilling to perform according to the negotiated terms and timetable of its respective agreement for any reason or terminates its agreement, we would be required to engage a substitute contractor. This would likely result in significant project delays and increased costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

We are relying on third-party engineers to estimate the future capacity ratings and performance capabilities of the Liquefaction Project, and these estimates may prove to be inaccurate.

We are relying on third parties, principally Bechtel, for the design and engineering services underlying our estimates of the future capacity ratings and performance capabilities of the Liquefaction Project. If any Train, when actually constructed, fails to have the capacity ratings and performance capabilities that we intend, our estimates may not be accurate. Failure of any of our Trains to achieve our intended capacity ratings and performance capabilities could prevent us from achieving the commercial start dates under our SPAs and could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

If third-party pipelines and other facilities interconnected to our facilities are or become unavailable to transport natural gas, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

We will depend upon third-party pipelines and other facilities that will provide gas delivery options to our Liquefaction Project. If the construction of new or modified pipeline connections is not completed on schedule or any pipeline connection were to become unavailable for current or future volumes of natural gas due to repairs, damage to the facility, lack of capacity or any other reason, our ability to meet our SPA obligations and continue shipping natural gas from producing regions could be restricted, thereby reducing our revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, operating results, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

25

Table of Contents

We may not be able to purchase or receive physical delivery of sufficient natural gas to satisfy our delivery obligations under the SPAs, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

Under the SPAs with our customers, we are required to make available to them a specified amount of LNG at specified times. However, we may not be able to purchase or receive physical delivery of sufficient quantities of natural gas to satisfy those obligations, which may provide affected SPA customers with the right to terminate their SPAs. Our failure to purchase or receive physical delivery of sufficient quantities of natural gas could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

We are subject to significant operating hazards and uninsured risks, one or more of which may create significant liabilities and losses for us.

The construction and operation of the Liquefaction Project is and will be subject to the inherent risks associated with this type of operation, including explosions, pollution, release of toxic substances, fires, hurricanes and adverse weather conditions, and other hazards, each of which could result in significant delays in commencement or interruptions of operations and/or in damage to or destruction of our facilities or damage to persons and property. In addition, our operations and the facilities and vessels of third parties on which our operations are dependent face possible risks associated with acts of aggression or terrorism.

We do not, nor do we intend to, maintain insurance against all of these risks and losses. We may not be able to maintain desired or required insurance in the future at rates that we consider reasonable. The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Cyclical or other changes in the demand for and price of LNG and natural gas may adversely affect our LNG business and the performance of our customers and could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flows, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Our LNG business and the development of domestic LNG facilities and projects generally is based on assumptions about the future availability and price of natural gas and LNG, and the prospects for international natural gas and LNG markets. Natural gas and LNG prices have been, and are likely to continue to be, volatile and subject to wide fluctuations in response to one or more of the following factors:

26

Table of Contents

Adverse trends or developments affecting any of these factors could result in decreases in the price of LNG and/or natural gas, which could materially and adversely affect the performance of our SPA customers, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flows, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Failure of LNG exported from the United States, including the Liquefaction Project, to be a competitive source of energy for international markets could adversely affect our customers and could materially and adversely affect our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Operations of the Liquefaction Project will be dependent upon the ability of our SPA customers to deliver LNG supplies from the United States, which is primarily dependent upon LNG being a competitive source of energy internationally. The success of our business plan is dependent, in part, on the extent to which LNG can, for significant periods and in significant volumes, be supplied from North America and delivered to international markets at a lower cost than the cost of alternative energy sources. Through the use of improved exploration technologies, additional sources of natural gas may be discovered outside the United States, which could increase the available supply of natural gas outside the United States and could result in natural gas in those markets being available at a lower cost than LNG exported to those markets.

Political instability in foreign countries that import natural gas, or strained relations between such countries and the United States, may also impede the willingness or ability of LNG suppliers and merchants in such countries to import LNG from the United States. Furthermore, some foreign suppliers of LNG may have economic or other reasons to obtain their LNG from non-U.S. markets or from our competitors’ liquefaction facilities in the United States.

In addition to natural gas, LNG also competes with other sources of energy, including coal, oil, nuclear, hydroelectric, wind and solar energy. LNG from the Liquefaction Project also competes with other sources of LNG, including LNG that is priced to indices other than Henry Hub. Some of these sources of energy may be available at a lower cost than LNG from the Liquefaction Project in certain markets. The cost of LNG supplies from the United States, including the Liquefaction Project, may also be impacted by an increase in natural gas prices in the United States.

As a result of these and other factors, LNG from the United States, including from the Liquefaction Project, may not be a competitive source of energy. The failure of U.S. LNG or LNG from the Liquefaction Project to be a competitive supply alternative to local natural gas, oil and other alternative energy sources in markets accessible to our customers could adversely affect the ability of our customers to deliver LNG from the United States or from the Liquefaction Project on a commercial basis. Any significant impediment to the ability to deliver LNG from the United States generally, or from the Liquefaction Project specifically, could have a material adverse effect on our customers and on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

27

Table of Contents

Various economic and political factors could negatively affect the development, construction and operation of the Liquefaction Project, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Commercial development of a liquefaction facility takes a number of years, requires a substantial capital investment and may be delayed by factors such as:

There may be shortages of LNG vessels worldwide, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

The construction and delivery of LNG vessels require significant capital and long construction lead times, and the availability of the vessels could be delayed to the detriment of our business and our customers because of:

We may not be able to secure firm pipeline transportation capacity on economic terms that is sufficient to meet our feed gas transportation requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on us.

We have contracted for firm capacity for our natural gas feedstock transportation requirements for Trains 1 through 5 of the Liquefaction Project and have an option for firm capacity for Train 6. We cannot control the regulatory and permitting approvals or third parties’ construction times. If and when we need to replace one or more of our agreements with these interconnecting pipelines, we may not be able to do so on commercially reasonable terms or at all, which could impair our ability to fulfill our obligations under certain of our SPAs and could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

28

Table of Contents

We face competition based upon the international market price for LNG.

The Liquefaction Project is subject to the risk of LNG price competition at times when we need to replace any existing SPA, whether due to natural expiration, default or otherwise, or enter into new SPAs with respect to Train 6. Factors relating to competition may prevent us from entering into a new or replacement SPA on economically comparable terms as existing SPAs, or at all. Such an event could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes. Factors that may negatively affect potential demand for LNG from the Liquefaction Project are diverse and include, among others:

Terrorist attacks, including cyberterrorism, or military campaigns may adversely impact our business.

A terrorist, including a cyberterrorist, or military incident involving an LNG facility, our infrastructure or an LNG vessel may result in delays in, or cancellation of, construction of new LNG facilities, including one or more of the Trains, which would increase our costs and decrease our cash flows. A terrorist incident may also result in temporary or permanent closure of existing LNG facilities, including the Sabine Pass LNG terminal, which could increase our costs and decrease our cash flows, depending on the duration and timing of the closure. Our operations could also become subject to increased governmental scrutiny that may result in additional security measures at a significant incremental cost to us. In addition, the threat of terrorism and the impact of military campaigns may lead to continued volatility in prices for natural gas that could adversely affect our business and our customers, including their ability to satisfy their obligations to us under our commercial agreements. Instability in the financial markets as a result of terrorism, including cyberterrorism, or war could also materially adversely affect our ability to raise capital. The continuation of these developments may subject our construction and our operations to increased risks, as well as increased costs, and, depending on their ultimate magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Existing and future environmental and similar laws and governmental regulations could result in increased compliance costs or additional operating costs or construction costs and restrictions.

Our business is and will be subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations that regulate and restrict, among other things, discharges to air, land and water, with particular respect to the protection of the environment and natural resources; the use, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous materials, hazardous waste, and petroleum products; and investigation and remediation associated with the release of hazardous substances. Many of these laws and regulations, such as the CAA, the Oil Pollution Act, the CWA and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (the “RCRA”), and analogous state laws and regulations, restrict or prohibit the types, quantities and concentration of substances that can be released into the environment in connection with the construction and operation of our facilities, and require us to maintain permits and provide

29

Table of Contents

governmental authorities with access to our facilities for inspection and submit filings and reports related to our compliance. Violation of these laws and regulations could lead to substantial liabilities, fines and penalties and/or to capital expenditures related to pollution control equipment that could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Federal and state laws can impose liability, without regard to fault or the lawfulness of the original conduct, for the release of certain types or quantities of hazardous substances into the environment. As the owner and operator of our facilities, we could be liable for the costs of cleaning up hazardous substances released into the environment at or from our facilities and for resulting damage to natural resources.

In October 2015, the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) promulgated a final rule to implement the Obama Administration’s Clean Power Plan, which is designed to reduce GHG emissions from power plants in the United States. In February 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the final rule, effectively suspending the duty to comply with the rule until certain legal challenges are resolved. Other federal and state initiatives are being considered or may be considered in the future to address GHG emissions through, for example, United States treaty commitments, direct regulation, a carbon emissions tax, or cap-and-trade programs. Such initiatives could affect the demand for or cost of natural gas or could increase compliance costs for our operations. The future of the Clean Power Plan and other GHG-related initiatives of the federal government may change under the Trump Administration.

Other future legislation and regulations, such as those relating to the transportation and security of LNG exported from the Sabine Pass LNG terminal could cause additional expenditures, restrictions and delays in our business and to our proposed construction, the extent of which cannot be predicted and which may require us to limit substantially, delay or cease operations in some circumstances. Revised, reinterpreted or additional laws and regulations that result in increased compliance costs or additional operating or construction costs and restrictions could have a material adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Our lack of diversification could have an adverse effect on our business, contracts, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, liquidity, prospects and ability to make payments of interest, principal or premium, if any, on the New Notes.

Due to our lack of asset and geographic diversification, an adverse development at the Liquefaction Project or in the LNG industry would have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition and operating results than if we maintained more diverse assets and operating areas.

We may incur impairments to long-lived assets.

We test our long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Significant negative industry or economic trends, reduced estimates of future cash flows for our business or disruptions to our business could lead to an impairment charge of our long-lived assets. Our valuation methodology for assessing impairment requires management to make judgments and assumptions based on historical experience and to rely heavily on projections of future operating performance. Projections of future operating results and cash flows may vary significantly from results. In addition, if our analysis results in an impairment to our long-lived assets, we may be required to record a charge to earnings in our financial statements during a period in which such impairment is determined to exist, which may negatively impact our operating results.

30

Table of Contents

Risks Relating to the Exchange Offer and the New Notes

If you do not properly tender your Old Notes, you will continue to hold unregistered outstanding notes and your ability to transfer outstanding notes will be adversely affected.

We will only issue New Notes in exchange for Old Notes that you timely and properly tender. Therefore, you should allow sufficient time to ensure timely delivery of the Old Notes, and you should carefully follow the instructions on how to tender your Old Notes. Neither we nor the exchange agent is required to tell you of any defects or irregularities with respect to your tender of Old Notes. Please read “The Exchange Offer—Procedures for Tendering” and “Description of Notes.”

If you do not exchange your Old Notes for New Notes in the exchange offer, you will continue to be subject to the restrictions on transfer of your Old Notes described in the legend on the certificates for your Old Notes. In general, you may only offer or sell the Old Notes if they are registered under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws, or offered and sold under an exemption from these requirements. Except in connection with this exchange offer or as required by the registration rights agreement, we do not intend to register resales of the Old Notes under the Securities Act. For further information regarding the consequences of not tendering your Old Notes in the exchange offer, please read “The Exchange Offer— Consequences of Failure to Exchange Outstanding Securities.”

Some holders who exchange their Old Notes may be deemed to be underwriters.

If you exchange your Old Notes in the exchange offer for the purpose of participating in a distribution of the New Notes, you may be deemed to have received restricted securities and, if so, will be required to comply with the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act in connection with any resale transaction.

We will be able to incur substantially more indebtedness in the future. This could further exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial leverage.

Subject to the covenants described under the headings “Description of Notes—Covenants Applicable to the Notes—Restriction on Indebtedness” and, as applicable, “Description of Notes—Covenants Applicable to the Notes—Changes in Covenants when Notes Rated Investment Grade,” the indenture governing the New Notes does not prohibit us from incurring additional indebtedness, including additional senior or secured indebtedness, and other liabilities, or from pledging assets to secure such indebtedness and liabilities. As of September 30, 2016, we $11.3 billion of long-term debt outstanding (before premium and net of unamortized debt issuance costs), including $2.0 billion of undrawn and available commitments under the 2015 Credit Facilities. As of September 30, 2016, we had $764.5 million of available commitments, $337.0 million aggregate amount of issued letters of credit and $98.5 million of loans outstanding under the Working Capital Facility. We had no other material indebtedness outstanding at September 30, 2016. We have the ability to draw the remaining available commitments under the Working Capital Facility for working capital requirements. See “Description of Other Indebtedness” for additional information regarding our 2015 Credit Facilities and the Working Capital Facility. We anticipate incurring additional indebtedness in connection with the construction of Train 6 if we make a positive FID with respect to such Train. The incurrence of additional indebtedness and, in particular, the granting of a security interest in the collateral to secure the indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to pay our obligations on the New Notes.

31

Table of Contents

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under the New Notes.

Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences to you, including:

Our ability to satisfy our obligations, including the New Notes, will depend upon our future operating performance. Prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control, will affect our ability to make payments on our debt obligations. If we cannot generate sufficient cash from operations to meet our other obligations, we may need to refinance or sell assets. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow, or we may not be able to obtain sufficient funding, to make the payments required by all of our debt, including the New Notes.

To service our indebtedness, we will require significant amounts of cash. Our ability to generate cash will depend on many factors beyond our control.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, including the New Notes, and to fund planned capital expenditures, will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, currently anticipated costs may increase or future borrowings may not be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness, including the New Notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, including the New Notes, on or before maturity. If any of the counterparties to our SPAs fails to perform its obligations under its respective SPA or if any of our SPAs are terminated, it could adversely affect our ability to make payments on or refinance the New Notes. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness, including the New Notes, on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

We may have to seek additional financing to construct Train 6.

We expect to continue to make significant capital outlays for the foreseeable future to fund the remaining cost of the Liquefaction Project including the potential construction of Train 6 prior to the time that we begin to generate positive cash flow from operations and for the foreseeable future thereafter. We believe that our outstanding Senior Notes, in addition to construction loans and unfunded commitments under our 2015 Credit

32

Table of Contents

Facilities and Working Capital Facility and projected operating cash flow, will be sufficient to meet our currently anticipated capital and operating and debt service requirements with respect to Trains 1 through 5 through December 31, 2020, the anticipated maturity date of the 2015 Credit Facilities. We began generating cash flows from operations in May 2016, when Train 1 of the Liquefaction Project initiated operating activities following the achievement of substantial completion. We currently project our cash flows will be sufficient to meet our ongoing capital and operating requirements and to pay the interest on our outstanding debt for Trains 1 through 5. If our cash flows from operations are less than projected, or if our future operating, capital and debt service requirements are higher than we currently estimate, we may require additional debt or equity financing in amounts that could be substantial.

The type, timing and terms of any future financing will depend on our cash requirements, our cash flows and prevailing conditions in the financial markets. Future financing may not be available to us at any given time or the terms thereof may not be favorable to us. Our current estimates of future operating results (which will depend upon numerous future factors and conditions, many of which are outside of our control) may not be accurate. They are merely estimates of future events and actual events will probably vary from current estimates, possibly materially. If we decide or are required to further expand our facility or to introduce new products or services, our funding needs will increase, possibly to a significant degree.

Because the costs of constructing, maintaining and operating the Liquefaction Project, the costs of conducting our business, and the amounts of our future revenues, will all depend on a variety of factors (including our ability to meet our construction schedules, performance by our contract counterparties and potential regulatory changes), actual costs and revenues may vary from expected amounts, possibly to a material degree, and such variations are likely to affect our future capital requirements. Accordingly, we may be required to raise substantial additional capital in the future and our current estimates may prove to be inaccurate.

The indenture governing the New Notes contains restrictions that limit our flexibility in operating our business.

The indenture governing the New Notes contains several significant covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to:

Under some circumstances, these restrictive covenants may not allow us the flexibility that we need to operate our business in an effective and efficient manner and may prevent us from taking advantage of strategic and financial opportunities that would benefit our business. However, certain of these covenants are also subject to significant exceptions which provide flexibility to us but may provide greater risk to holders of the New Notes.

If we fail to comply with the restrictions in the indenture governing the New Notes, the Common Terms Agreement or any other subsequent financing agreements, a default may allow the creditors, if the agreements so provide, to accelerate the related indebtedness as well as any other indebtedness to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies.

33

Table of Contents

We may not be able to repurchase New Notes upon a change of control or upon the exercise of the holders’ options to require repurchase of notes if certain asset sales or loss events occur.

Upon the occurrence of a change of control, as defined under the caption “Description of Notes—Certain Definitions,” you have the right to require us to repurchase your notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the principal amount of your notes plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. After the Project Completion Date, as defined under the caption “Description of Notes—Certain Definitions,” a change of control shall not be deemed to have occurred if we receive rating reaffirmations from two rating agencies (or one rating agency, if only one rating agency currently rates the New Notes) reaffirming the then current rating of the New Notes as of the date of such change of control. Any future credit agreement or other agreements relating to indebtedness to which we become a party may contain similar provisions. In the event that we experience a change of control as defined in the indenture governing the New Notes that results in us having to repurchase the New Notes or upon the exercise of the holders’ options to require repurchase of the New Notes in the event of certain asset sales or loss events, we may not have sufficient financial resources to satisfy all of our obligations under the New Notes and our other debt instruments. Our failure to make the change of control offer or to pay the change of control purchase price when due or to make payments upon the exercise of the holders’ options to require repurchase of the New Notes in the event of certain asset sales or loss events would result in a default under the indenture governing the New Notes. In addition, the change of control feature of the New Notes does not cover all corporate reorganizations, mergers or similar transactions and may not provide you with protection in a highly leveraged transaction. See “Description of Notes—Repurchase at the Option of Holders—Change of Control.”

Holders of the New Notes may not be able to determine when a change of control giving rise to their right to have the New Notes repurchased has occurred following a sale of “substantially all” of our assets.

The definition of change of control in the indenture governing the New Notes includes a phrase relating to the sale of “all or substantially all” of our assets. There is no precise established definition of the phrase “substantially all” under applicable law. Accordingly, the ability of a holder of notes to require us to repurchase its notes as a result of a sale of less than all our assets to another person may be uncertain.

Federal and state statutes allow courts, under specific circumstances, to void the New Notes and require note holders to return payments received from us.

Under the federal bankruptcy laws and comparable provisions of state fraudulent transfer laws, the New Notes could be voided, or claims in respect of the New Notes could be subordinated to all other debts of ours if, among other things, we, at the time the indebtedness evidenced by the New Notes was incurred:

In addition, any payment by us could be voided and required to be returned to us, or to a fund for the benefit of our creditors. In any such case, your right to receive payments in respect of the New Notes from us would be effectively subordinated to all of our indebtedness and other liabilities.

34

Table of Contents

The rights of the Common Security Trustee to foreclose upon collateral may be impaired by bankruptcy law.

The rights of Société Générale, as the Common Security Trustee and Intercreditor Agent named in the 2015 Credit Facilities (the “Common Security Trustee”) to foreclose upon and sell collateral, including assets in any accounts, upon the occurrence of an event of default under the Common Terms Agreement or the indenture governing the New Notes is likely to be significantly impaired by applicable bankruptcy law if a bankruptcy or reorganization case were to be commenced by or against us. Under applicable bankruptcy law, secured creditors such as the holders of the New Notes would be prohibited from foreclosing upon or disposing of a debtor’s property without prior bankruptcy court approval.

Your ability to resell the New Notes may be limited by a number of factors; prices for the New Notes may be volatile.

There currently is no established market for the New Notes, and no active or liquid trading market may develop for the New Notes. We do not intend to apply for listing of the New Notes on any securities exchange or on any automated dealer quotation system. If a market for the New Notes were to develop, the New Notes could trade at prices that may be higher or lower than reflected by their initial offering price, depending on many factors, including among other things:

There may not be sufficient collateral to pay all or any amounts due on the New Notes.

We own no significant assets other than those related to the ownership and operation of the Liquefaction Project. If we default under the indenture governing the New Notes, the Common Security Trustee’s remedies under the security documents, including foreclosure on the collateral, may not provide sufficient funds to pay our obligations under the indenture governing the New Notes. Moreover, our direct and indirect owners and their affiliates do not have any liability for the payment or performance of the New Notes.

The New Notes are secured by a first priority lien on the collateral, equal in right of security with the holders of the Senior Notes, lenders under the Working Capital Facility, and the lenders under the 2015 Credit Facilities and any of our other debt permitted to be secured by the collateral. To the extent third parties enjoy prior liens, such third parties may have rights and remedies with respect to the property subject to such liens that, if exercised, could adversely affect the value of the collateral. See “Description of Notes—Security.” Any additional Permitted Liens or the incurrence of additional secured debt may have the effect of significantly diluting your ability to recover payment in full on the New Notes from the then existing pool of collateral and will adversely affect your relative position with respect to the collateral.

The value of the collateral at any time will depend on market and other economic conditions, including the availability of suitable buyers for the collateral. The value of the assets that are pledged or charged, as applicable, as collateral could be impaired in the future as a result of changing economic conditions, competition or other future trends. In the event of a foreclosure, liquidation, bankruptcy or similar proceeding, no assurance can be given that the proceeds from any sale or liquidation of the collateral will be sufficient to pay our obligations under the New Notes, in full or at all. Accordingly, there may not be sufficient collateral to pay all or any of the

35

Table of Contents

amounts due on the New Notes. Any claim for the difference between the amount, if any, realized by you from the sale of any portion of the collateral and the amount of our obligations owed to you under the New Notes will rank equally in right of payment with all of our other unsecured debt and other obligations that are not subordinated, including trade payables.

In addition, releases of collateral from the liens securing the New Notes will be permitted under certain circumstances. On June 30, 2015, we entered into a second amended and restated intercreditor agreement (which amended and restated the intercreditor agreement entered into on May 28, 2013), with representatives of holders of our secured debt and Société Générale, as the Common Security Trustee and Intercreditor Agent (the “Intercreditor Agreement”), which governs the relationship between the Secured Parties and regulates the claims of the Secured Parties against us and the enforcement by the Secured Parties of the liens upon any collateral, including the method of voting and decision making, and the appointment of the Intercreditor Agent.

The actual provisions relating to such releases are contained in the Intercreditor Agreement and the indenture governing the New Notes. See “Description of Notes—Security.” If the Common Security Trustee were to foreclose upon our assets, there are certain assets, such as permits and certain contracts, which the Common Security Trustee may not be able to effectively foreclose upon without the consent of third parties, such as a governmental authority. We cannot assure you that if the Common Security Trustee forecloses on our assets, the Common Security Trustee will be able to obtain all of the third-party approvals necessary to obtain or transfer ownership of all assets necessary to operate the Liquefaction Project.

Furthermore, if the Common Security Trustee forecloses on the collateral, then, in connection therewith, transferring required permits to a purchaser or new operator of the Liquefaction Project may require additional governmental approvals or proceedings, which could result in delays. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that, if we default on the payments due on the New Notes and the Common Security Trustee forecloses on and sells the collateral, you will receive sufficient proceeds to pay all amounts that we owe on the New Notes.

The Intercreditor Agreement contains provisions that may limit the remedies that could be exercised in respect of an event of default, unless and until the required parties have directed the Intercreditor Agent who, in turn, directs the Common Security Trustee to do so. The holders of the New Notes are also deemed to vote in conformity with Secured Bank Debt Holders in numerous instances.

The Intercreditor Agreement requires the affirmative vote of Secured Parties representing a certain percentage of our outstanding secured debt obligations to direct specific actions of the Intercreditor Agent and Common Security Trustee, including the exercise of remedies with respect to the collateral following an event of default under the indenture governing the New Notes or the documents governing such other secured debt (including the 2015 Credit Facilities and Working Capital Facility). Because the affirmative vote of these required Secured Parties will be required before the Common Security Trustee will be able to exercise remedies, if an event of default under the indenture governing the New Notes were to occur, no remedies could be exercised in respect of the collateral unless and until the required Secured Parties have directed the Intercreditor Agent who, in turn, directs the Common Security Trustee to do so. If the holders of the New Notes do not constitute holders of at least the applicable percentage of the outstanding indebtedness secured by the collateral, the Indenture Trustee and the holders of the New Notes may not be able to direct the Intercreditor Agent or the Common Security Trustee to exercise remedies in respect of the collateral upon the occurrence of an event of default under the indenture governing the New Notes without the affirmative vote of other Secured Parties. In certain cases under the Intercreditor Agreement, the holders of the New Notes do not have the right to vote and decisions will be determined by other holders of our secured debt. See “Description of Notes—Summary Description of Principal Finance Documents—Common Terms Agreement, Intercreditor Agreement and Security Agency Agreement—Voting and Decision-Making” and “—Enforcement of Security Interests.”

36

Table of Contents

The indenture also provides that in numerous instances the holders of the New Notes are deemed to vote in conformity with the Secured Bank Debt Holders, without the requirement of a vote or consent by the holders of the New Notes. See “Description of Notes—Summary Description of Principal Finance Documents—Common Terms Agreement, Intercreditor Agreement and Security Agency Agreement—Modifications—Majority Decisions” and “—Unanimous Decisions.” Please see “Description of Notes—Certain Definitions” for definitions of capitalized terms in this Risk Factor.

The remedies available to the holders of the New Notes and the Common Security Trustee may be limited in bankruptcy.

If we seek the protection of bankruptcy or insolvency laws, or if one or more of our creditors commences an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding against us, the Common Security Trustee’s rights to foreclose on the collateral and our ability to make payments in respect of the New Notes are likely to be significantly impaired. Upon the commencement of a case for relief under Title 11 of the U.S. Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a secured creditor such as the Common Security Trustee is prohibited from repossessing its security from a debtor in a bankruptcy case, or from disposing of security repossessed from such debtor, without bankruptcy court approval. Moreover, the Bankruptcy Code permits the debtor to continue to remain and use collateral although the debtor is in default under the applicable debt instrument, provided that the secured creditor is given “adequate protection.” The meaning of the term “adequate protection” may vary according to the circumstances, but it is intended to protect the value of the secured creditor’s interest in the collateral and may include cash payments or the granting of additional security if and at such times as the court in its discretion determines that the value of the secured creditor’s interest in the collateral is declining during the pendency of the bankruptcy case. A bankruptcy court may determine that a secured creditor is “adequately protected” and therefore not entitled to prevent diminution in the value of its collateral if the value of the collateral sufficiently exceeds the debt it secures.

In view of the lack of a precise definition of the term “adequate protection” and the broad discretionary and equitable powers of a bankruptcy court, it is impossible to predict:

Furthermore, in the event a bankruptcy court determines that the value of the collateral is not sufficient to repay all amounts due on the New Notes, the holders of the New Notes would hold a secured claim to the extent of the value of the collateral to which the holders of the New Notes are entitled and would hold unsecured claims with respect to such shortfall. The Bankruptcy Code permits the payment and accrual of post-petition interest, costs and attorney’s fees to a secured creditor during a debtor’s court proceeding to exceed the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the obligations secured by the collateral up to the value of the collateral. In addition, if we or any counterparty to any one of our contracts were the subject of bankruptcy proceedings, then we or such counterparty, as the case may be, or a trustee appointed in the applicable bankruptcy case, could choose to reject the contract. If that occurred, the contract would be treated as terminated and the Common Security Trustee could not specifically enforce the rejected contract.

Your rights in the collateral may be adversely affected by the failure to perfect security interests in such collateral and other issues generally associated with the realization of security interests in such collateral.

Generally, a security interest in tangible and intangible assets can only be properly perfected, a valid lien created on such assets can only be granted, and the priority of such lien can only be retained, if certain actions are undertaken by the applicable Secured Party. The liens in all collateral from time to time owned by us may not be

37

Table of Contents

perfected or validly created with respect to the New Notes if the Common Security Trustee has not taken the actions necessary to perfect or validly create any of those liens upon or prior to the issuance of the New Notes. The inability or failure of the Common Security Trustee to take all actions necessary to create properly perfected security interests or validly created liens on the collateral may result in the loss of the priority of the security interest for your benefit to which you would have been entitled had such perfection or valid creation of such liens been effectuated by the Common Security Trustee. In addition, applicable law provides that certain property and rights acquired after the grant of a general security interest can only be perfected and a lien on such property and rights validly created at the time such property and rights are acquired and identified. We will have limited obligations to perfect your security interest in, or create valid liens with respect to, specified collateral. We cannot assure you that the Common Security Trustee will monitor, or that we will inform the Common Security Trustee of, the future acquisition of property and rights that constitute collateral, and that the necessary action will be taken to properly perfect the security interest in, or create a valid lien with respect to, such after-acquired collateral. Our failure to meet our obligations to inform the Common Security Trustee of the future acquisition of property or rights that constitute collateral may constitute a breach under the security document, which may result in the acceleration of our indebtedness. However, acceleration of such obligations in such situation may not provide an adequate remedy to you if the value of the collateral is impaired by the failure to perfect the security interest in, or create a valid lien with respect to, such after-acquired collateral. The Common Security Trustee has no obligation to monitor the acquisition of additional property or rights that constitute collateral or the perfection of any security interest or the creation of a valid lien with respect thereto. Such failure may result in the loss of the security interest in the collateral or the priority of the security interest granted to secure the New Notes as against third parties.

The collateral is subject to casualty risks, which may limit your ability to recover as a secured creditor for losses to the collateral, and which may have an adverse impact on our operations and results.

The indenture governing the New Notes and the security documents will require us to maintain insurance with responsible and financially sound insurance carriers, in such form and amounts as is necessary to insure the projected maximum loss for the Liquefaction Project. However, there are certain losses, including losses resulting from terrorist acts, which may be either uninsurable or not economical to insure, in whole or in part. As a result, we cannot assure you that the insurance proceeds will compensate us fully for our losses. If there is a total or partial loss of any of the collateral, we cannot assure you that any insurance proceeds received by us will be sufficient to satisfy all of our obligations, including the New Notes.

In the event of a total or partial loss affecting any of the collateral securing the New Notes, certain items of equipment and inventory may not be easily replaced. Accordingly, although there may be insurance coverage, the extended period needed to obtain replacement units or inventory may cause significant delays, which may have an adverse impact on our operations and results.

The indenture governing the New Notes does not contain the representations and warranties, covenants or events of default contained in the Common Terms Agreement.

On June 30, 2015, we entered into a second amended and restated common terms agreement, with representatives of holders of our secured debt and Société Générale, as the Common Security Trustee and Intercreditor Agent in order to set out certain provisions regarding, among other things: (a) common representations and warranties; (b) common covenants; and (c) common events of default under the secured debt instruments. In connection with the Bank of New York Mellon (the “Indenture Trustee”) becoming party to the Common Terms Agreement and the Intercreditor Agreement, the Indenture Trustee has opted out of the representations and warranties, covenants and most events of default under the Common Terms Agreement, and the covenants and events of default applicable to the New Notes are as set forth in the indenture, as described under “Description of Notes.” As a holder of the New Notes, you will not have the benefit of the representations and warranties, covenants or many of the events of default pursuant to the Common Terms Agreement.

38

Table of Contents

Any future pledge of collateral might be avoidable in bankruptcy.

Any future pledge of collateral in favor of the collateral trustee, including pursuant to security documents delivered after the date of the indenture governing the New Notes, might be avoidable by the pledgor (as the debtor in possession in a bankruptcy proceeding) or by the trustee in bankruptcy if certain events or circumstances exist or occur, including, among others, if the pledgor is insolvent at the time of the pledge, the pledge permits the holders of the New Notes to receive greater recovery than if the pledge had not been given and a bankruptcy proceeding in respect of the pledgor is commenced within 90 days following the pledge or, in certain circumstances, a longer period.

A future subsidiary’s guarantee of the New Notes may be reduced, avoided or released under certain circumstances and you may not receive any payments from some or all of those guarantors.

Our future domestic subsidiaries will be required to guarantee the New Notes under certain circumstances. There is legal uncertainty regarding whether those guarantees would be legally enforceable in any bankruptcy proceedings involving those guarantors. If a subsidiary’s guarantee is unenforceable, any security interest in the subsidiary’s assets granted to secure that guarantee also could be set aside and the property made available to other creditors of the bankrupt subsidiary. Among other things, there is a risk that the guarantee, and any related security interest, could be considered a fraudulent conveyance, that can be set aside in bankruptcy proceedings. The indenture governing the New Notes contains a “savings clause,” which limits the liability of each subsidiary’s note guarantee to the maximum amount that such guarantor can incur without risk that its note guarantee will be subject to avoidance as a fraudulent transfer. As a result, a guarantor’s liability under its note guarantee could be reduced in amount or reduced to zero, depending upon the amount of other obligations of such guarantor. We cannot assure you that this limitation of liability will protect such note guarantees from fraudulent transfer challenges or, if it does, that the remaining amount due and collectible under the note guarantees would be sufficient to pay the New Notes in full when due.

The New Notes will be structurally subordinated in right of payment to the indebtedness and other liabilities of our future subsidiaries that do not guarantee the New Notes.

The New Notes, and guarantees of our future subsidiaries, will be structurally subordinated to all of the liabilities of any of our future subsidiaries that do not guarantee the New Notes and these liabilities would be required to be paid before the holders of the New Notes have a claim, if any, against those subsidiaries and their assets. Therefore, if there was a dissolution, bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any such subsidiary, the holders of notes would not receive any amounts with respect to the New Notes from the assets of such non-guarantor subsidiary until after the payment in full of the claims of creditors of such subsidiary. As of the date of this prospectus, we do not have any subsidiaries.

Your right to receive payments under the New Notes are effectively subordinated to indebtedness secured by other assets.

The New Notes will be effectively subordinated to any secured debt we may incur that is secured by assets that are not part of the collateral securing the New Notes to the extent of the assets securing such debt. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution, reorganization, bankruptcy or similar proceeding involving us, such assets which serve as collateral for such other secured debt that are not part of the collateral securing the New Notes will be available to satisfy the obligations under such secured debt before any payments are made on the New Notes.

The ratings of the New Notes may be lowered or withdrawn.

The ratings address the likelihood of timely payment of the scheduled interest and principal on each scheduled payment date. The ratings do not address the likelihood of payment of any overdue interest, premiums

39

Table of Contents

or any other amounts payable in respect of the New Notes or the timeliness of any accelerated principal payments coming due as the result of the occurrence of an event of default. A rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a note (or beneficial interests therein) and is subject to revision or withdrawal in the future by each rating agency.

Changes in our credit rating could adversely affect the market price or liquidity of the New Notes.

Credit rating agencies continually revise their ratings for the companies that they follow. Credit rating agencies also evaluate our industry as a whole and may change their credit ratings for us based on their overall view of our industry. We cannot be sure that credit rating agencies will maintain their initial ratings on the New Notes. A negative change in our ratings could have an adverse effect on the trading price or liquidity of the New Notes.

40

Table of Contents