SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
December 1, 2017
Commission File Number: 001-14684
Shaw Communications Inc.
(Translation of registrants name into English)
Suite 900, 630 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta T2P 4L4 (403) 750-4500
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F:
Form 20-F ☐ Form 40-F ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): ☐
The information contained in this report on Form 6-K and any exhibits hereto shall be deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) solely for purpose of being and hereby are incorporated by reference into and as part of the Registration Statement on Form F-10 (File No. 333-209068) and the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-215151), each filed by the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and into each prospectus outstanding thereunder.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Shaw Communications Inc. |
||||||
Date: December 1, 2017 | ||||||
By: |
/s/ Vito Culmone |
|||||
Name: |
Vito Culmone |
|||||
Title: |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Shaw Communications Inc. |
2
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | |
1 | Notice & Proxy Circular | |
2 | Proxy |
3
Exhibit 1
1 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
1. |
4 | |||||||
2. |
4 | |||||||
3. |
13 | |||||||
14 | ||||||||
1. |
14 | |||||||
2. |
14 | |||||||
3. |
15 | |||||||
4. |
15 | |||||||
5. |
16 | |||||||
6. |
16 | |||||||
7. |
16 | |||||||
8. |
16 | |||||||
17 | ||||||||
1. |
17 | |||||||
2. |
31 | |||||||
3. |
33 | |||||||
4. |
34 | |||||||
5. |
36 | |||||||
39 | ||||||||
1. |
39 | |||||||
2. |
40 | |||||||
3. |
43 | |||||||
4. |
44 | |||||||
5. |
47 | |||||||
6. |
49 | |||||||
7. |
49 | |||||||
51 | ||||||||
A-1 |
SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
AND AVAILABILITY OF MATERIALS
Date: |
Thursday, January 11, 2018 |
|
Time: |
11:00 a.m. (Mountain time) |
|
Location: |
Shaw Court 630 3 rd Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta |
Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw) will be holding its annual general meeting (the Meeting) at the above-referenced time and location.
Shaw is again using the notice and access model for delivery of materials to its shareholders for the Meeting. This model supports our environmental goals by reducing paper use and reduces the cost of printing and mailing.
Under notice and access, holders of Class A Participating Shares (Class A Shares) receive a proxy or voting instruction form enabling them to vote at the Meeting; however, instead of a paper copy of the management proxy circular (Circular), they receive this notice with information on how to access the Circular electronically. Holders of Class B Non-Voting Participating Shares (Class B Non-Voting Shares) will also receive this notice with information on how to access the Circular electronically.
Business of the Meeting: |
Heading in the Circular under Business of
the Meeting where matter is described |
|
1. Receive Shaws consolidated financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2017 and the auditors report on those statements |
Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
2. Elect directors |
Election of Directors |
|
3. Appoint auditors |
Appointment and Remuneration of Auditors |
|
4. Transact such other business as may properly come before the Meeting |
Voting Shares
Holders of Class A Shares of record at the close of business on November 24, 2017 are the only shareholders entitled to vote at the Meeting. Holders of Class B Non-Voting Shares are entitled to attend and speak at the Meeting, but are not entitled to vote on any matter proposed for consideration at the Meeting.
Voting
Registered Shareholders
A holder of Class A Shares who holds the shares directly in their own name and not through a nominee (such as a bank, securities broker, trustee, trust company or other institution) is a registered shareholder. Registered holders of Class A Shares are asked to return their proxies to AST Trust Company (Canada) using one of the following methods:
Internet: |
www.astvotemyproxy.com |
|
Telephone: |
1-888-489-5760 |
|
Facsimile: |
1-866-781-3111 (North America) |
|
416-368-2502 (outside North America) | ||
Email: |
proxyvote@astfinancial.com |
|
Mail: |
AST Trust Company (Canada), P.O. Box 721, Agincourt, Ontario, M1S 0A1 |
Notice of Meeting Shaw Communications Inc. |
1 |
In order to be valid and acted upon at the Meeting, completed proxies or votes must be received by AST Trust Company (Canada) by 11:00 a.m. (Mountain Time) on Tuesday, January 9, 2018 or, in the case of any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting, at least 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) prior to the time of the adjourned or postponed Meeting. A person appointed as a proxyholder need not be a shareholder. See the Circular for further instructions.
Non-Registered Shareholders
A holder of Class A Shares who holds the shares through an account in the name of a nominee (such as a bank, securities broker, trustee, trust company or other institution) is a non-registered (or beneficial) shareholder. Non-registered holders of Class A Shares are asked to return their voting instruction form using the following methods at least one business day before the proxy deposit date noted in the voting instruction form.
Internet: |
www.proxyvote.com |
|
Telephone: |
1-800-474-7493 (English) or 1-800-474-7501 (French) |
|
Mail: |
Data Processing Centre, PO Box 2800 Stn Lcd Malton, Mississauga ON L5T 2T7 |
Right to Attend
Registered and non-registered shareholders are entitled to attend the Meeting. Registered and non-registered shareholders will be required to register for the meeting by identifying themselves at the registration desk. All shareholders should be prepared to present valid photo identification on registration and non-registered shareholders should be prepared to present proof of share ownership.
Websites Where Meeting Materials are Posted
Electronic copies of the proxy-related materials and the 2017 Annual Report may be found and downloaded at http://www.meetingdocuments.com/astca/sjr or at Shaws profile at www.sedar.com .
Shareholders are reminded to review the Circular before voting.
Paper Copies of Meeting Materials
Should you wish to receive paper copies of the proxy materials for the Meeting or Shaws 2017 Annual Report, or if you have any questions about notice-and access, please contact AST Trust Company (Canada) at 1-888-433-6443 or fulfilment@astfinancial.com .
A request for materials will need to be received prior to December 27, 2017 in order to receive paper copies in advance of the deadline for submission of proxies or voting instruction forms for the Meeting. Materials will be sent within three business days of requests received before the date of the Meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||
(signed) |
Peter A. Johnson | |
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Regulatory Officer |
Calgary, Alberta
November 27 , 2017
2 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Notice of Meeting |
SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.
The information contained in this proxy circular is provided in connection with the solicitation of proxies by and on behalf of management of Shaw Communications Inc. (Shaw or the Company) for use at the annual general meeting (the Meeting) of shareholders of the Company to be held on January 11, 2018, and any adjournments thereof, as set forth in the attached Notice of Meeting.
The Company uses the notice and access model for delivery of Meeting materials. This model supports our environmental goals by reducing use of paper and the cost of printing and mailing materials for the Meeting.
Registered and non-registered holders of Class A Participating Shares ( Class A Shares ) will receive a proxy or voting instruction form and a copy of the enclosed notice that sets out how to access this proxy circular on-line. Holders of Class B Non-Voting Participating Shares ( Class B Non-Voting Shares ) will also receive a copy of the enclosed notice. A paper copy of this proxy circular by mail can also be requested by contacting the Companys transfer agent, AST Trust Company (Canada), at 1-888-433-6443 or fulfilment@astfinancial.com .
Meeting materials will be sent to registered shareholders by AST Trust Company (Canada). Meeting materials will be sent to non-registered shareholders by Broadridge Investor Communication Solutions, who acts on behalf of intermediaries to send proxy materials. The Company will pay intermediaries to send Meeting materials and voting instruction forms to objecting non-registered shareholders.
It is expected that solicitation of proxies for the Meeting will primarily be by mail, but may also be made by telephone or other means of telecommunication by directors, officers or employees of the Company. The cost of the solicitation will be borne by the Company.
Unless otherwise noted, the information contained in this proxy circular is given as of November 27, 2017. All amounts are expressed in Canadian dollars.
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
3 |
1. |
Consolidated Financial Statements |
The Companys audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended August 31, 2017 and the related managements discussion and analysis are included in the Companys 2017 Annual Report which was mailed to those shareholders who have requested a copy. Electronic copies of the 2017 Annual Report may be found and downloaded at http://www.meetingdocuments.com/astca/sjr or at the Companys profile on www.sedar.com or the Companys website at www.shaw.ca . A paper copy by mail can also be requested by contacting AST Trust Company (Canada) at 1-888-433-6443 or fulfilment@astfinancial.com .
Other information concerning the Company, including the Companys Business Conduct Standards and 2017 Annual Information Form may be found and downloaded at the Companys profile on www.sedar.com or the Companys website at www.shaw.ca or on request without charge from the Corporate Secretary of the Company, Suite 900, 630 3rd Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2P 4L4, Telephone (403) 750-4500. Copies of any documents referred to in the proxy circular as being available on the Companys website may also be obtained from the Corporate Secretary of the Company.
2. |
Election of Directors |
The number of directors to be elected to the Board of Directors (the Board ) of the Company is 16. Directors will hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders of the Company or until their successors are elected or appointed.
The name of each nominee and his or her municipality of residence, age, year first elected or appointed a director, biography, meeting attendance record, ownership of securities of the Company, as applicable, and other information are set out below.
Management of the Company recommends voting in favour of each nominee listed below.
Under the Companys majority voting policy, in an uncontested election, a director who does not receive the support of a majority of the votes cast will tender his or her resignation. The Board may refer the matter to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee for consideration and recommendation to the Board. The Board will promptly accept the resignation unless there are exceptional circumstances that justify a delay in accepting the resignation or rejection of it. The Board will make a decision within 90 days after the relevant meeting and issue a press release announcing the resignation or explaining why it has not been accepted.
4 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
5 |
6 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
7 |
8 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
9 |
10 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
SHEILA C. WEATHERILL, C.M. Edmonton, AB, Canada Age: 72 Director Since: 2009 Independent |
Sheila Weatherill is a member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Ms. Weatherill is former President and Chief Executive Officer of the Capital Health Authority, the Edmonton region health administrative authority. Ms. Weatherill is the Vice Chair of Epcor Utilities Inc. and Chair of Epcors Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. She was also a director of Canada Health Infoway, Inc. until July 2017. Ms. Weatherill holds a nursing degree from the University of Alberta. Ms. Weatherills honours include receiving an Honourary Doctor of Laws degree from the University of Lethbridge, Honourary Bachelor of Arts degree from MacEwan University, Alberta Centennial Medal and appointment as a Member of the Order of Canada. Ms. Weatherill is also a Distinguished Executive in residence in the School of Business, University of Alberta and is a member of several philanthropic and community organizations. Ms. Weatherill was formerly a member of the Prime Ministers Advisory Committee on the Public Service and formerly the Independent Investigator of the 2008 Listeriosis Outbreak. |
|||||||||||
2017 AGM Vote Results votes for votes withheld |
19,951,538 200 |
|||||||||||
Fiscal 2017 Meeting Attendance Board of Directors Corporate Governance & Nominating Committee |
9 of 9 (100%)
4 of 4 (100%) |
|||||||||||
Skills: · Senior Executive Leadership
· Strategic Planning Leadership
· Human Resources and Executive Compensation
· Government and Regulatory |
||||||||||||
Securities Owned / Controlled (1) | ||||||||||||
Year | Class A Shares | Class B Non-Voting Shares | Options (2) | DSU (3) | Equity Value (12)(13) | |||||||
2017 |
Nil | Nil | 70,000 | 54,060 | $1,529,898 | |||||||
2016 |
Nil | Nil | 70,000 | 44,782 |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
11 |
WILLARD H. YUILL Medicine Hat, AB, Canada Age: 79 Director Since: 1999 Independent |
Willard Yuill is the Chair of the Human Resource and Compensation Committee. He has been the Chair and Chief Executive Officer of The Monarch Corporation, a private equity company since 1972 and CSH International, Inc., a United States private equity company. Prior to its sale in 2000, Monarch Broadcasting Ltd. owned and operated 15 radio licenses and six television licences for regions in Alberta and British Columbia. In 2004, the Company completed the acquisition from Monarch Cablesystems of certain cable systems comprising 35,000 cable television and Internet customers in Alberta and British Columbia. Mr. Yuill is currently a director of the Western Investment Company of Canada Limited, a public company on the TSXV. He is a Trustee of St. Andrews College Foundation and a Governor of the Western Hockey League. He is a former director of Western Financial Group, the Alberta Economic Development Authority and the Medicine Hat Exhibition and Stampede Ltd. and he is past Chair of the Alberta chapter of the World Presidents Organization. Mr. Yuill received an Honorary Doctor of Laws from the University of Lethbridge. In October 2016, Mr. Yuill was awarded the Alberta Order of Excellence. In 2017, Mr. Yuill received an honorary Applied Degree from Medicine Hat College and was inducted into the Calgary Business Hall of Fame. |
|||||||||||
2017 AGM Vote Results votes for votes withheld |
19,948,453 3,285 |
|||||||||||
Fiscal 2017 Meeting Attendance Board of Directors
Human Resources & Compensation
|
9 of 9 (100%)
6 of 6 (100%) |
|||||||||||
Skills: · Operations Experience in Internet, Video and/or Voice
· Human Resources and Executive Compensation
· Risk Evaluation and Management
· Government and Regulatory |
||||||||||||
Securities Owned / Controlled (1) | ||||||||||||
Year | Class A Shares | Class B Non-Voting Shares | Options (2) | DSU (3) | Equity Value (12)(13) | |||||||
2017 |
10,800 | 4,586,722 | Nil | 33,656 | $131,080,589 | |||||||
2016 |
10,800 | 5,136,033 | 50,000 | 27,458 |
Notes:
(1) |
The information as to the securities beneficially owned, or over which control or direction is exercised, or as noted in Notes 5, 6 and 15, has been furnished by the nominees as of November 18, 2016 and November 27, 2017. |
(2) |
For further details of stock options granted to directors, see the information under the heading Statement of Compensation Compensation of Directors. |
(3) |
DSU means deferred share unit. The DDSU Plan was adopted effective January 1, 2004. See the information under the heading Statement of Compensation Compensation of Directors DDSU Plan. |
(4) |
Jeffrey C. Royer beneficially owns 33,169 Class B Non-Voting Shares. Associates of Mr. Royer own 100,000 Class A Shares and 15,111,105 Class B Non-Voting Shares. Mr. Royer does not beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control or direction over, such shares. This information is included solely to provide more fulsome disclosure to shareholders. The equity value of Mr. Royers holdings excludes the 100,000 Class A Shares and 15,111,105 Class B Non-Voting Shares owned by his associates. |
(5) |
The Vogel Family 2012 Irrevocable Family Trust, an associate of Mr. Vogel, holds the indicated 70,000 Class B Non-Voting Shares. Mr. Vogel does not beneficially own, directly or indirectly, or exercise control or direction over, such shares. This information is included solely to provide more fulsome disclosure to shareholders. The equity value of Mr. Vogels holdings excludes the 70,000 Class B Non-Voting Shares held by The Vogel Family 2012 Irrevocable Family Trust (an associate of Mr. Vogel). |
(6) |
JR Shaw is the father of Jim Shaw and Bradley S. Shaw. Shaw Family Living Trust (SFLT) and its subsidiaries hold 17,562,400 Class A Shares (representing approximately 78% of the outstanding Class A Shares). The sole trustee of SFLT is a private company owned by JR Shaw and having a board comprised of seven directors, including as at November 27, 2017, JR Shaw as Chair, Jim Shaw, Bradley S. Shaw, three other members of JR Shaws family, and one independent director. SFLT and its subsidiaries hold these shares for the benefit of descendants of JR and Carol Shaw. JR Shaw controls these shares and 77,000 additional Class A Shares. See Voting Procedures Voting Shares and Principal Holders Thereof. |
(7) |
Each of JR Shaw, Jim Shaw, Bradley S. Shaw and Peter J. Bissonnette have elected not to receive director fees. |
(8) |
Each of Richard R. Green and JC Sparkman is a member of the board of directors of Liberty Global, Inc. Each of JC Sparkman and Carl E. Vogel is a member of the board of directors of Universal Electronics Inc. |
(9) |
JR Shaw was a director of Darian Resources Ltd. ( Darian ) prior to its filing for creditor protection under the Companies Creditors Arrangement Act (the CCAA ) on February 12, 2010. Darian successfully completed its restructuring proceedings under the CCAA on July 2, 2010. |
(10) |
Jim Shaw and Peter J. Bissonnette did not serve on a committee of the Board during fiscal 2017. |
(11) |
Each member of the Audit Committee is independent and financially literate as defined in National Instrument 52-110 Audit Committees and each of Michael W. OBrien and Jeffrey C. Royer qualifies as a financial expert under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ( Sarbanes-Oxley Act ) and other applicable regulatory requirements. |
(12) |
Equity value is calculated using $29.99 per Class A Share and $28.30 per Class B Non-Voting Share, being the closing prices on November 27, 2017. Equity value includes Class A Shares, Class B Non-Voting Shares, and DSUs (but excludes options). The equity value for each of JR Shaw, Jeffrey C. Royer and Carl E. Vogel is calculated based on the shares beneficially owned by him (see, respectively, notes 5, 6 and 15). |
12 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
(13) |
Each of the nominee directors meet the share ownership guidelines (see Compensation of Directors Share Ownership Guidelines), with the exception of Mike Sievert who has just been nominated to stand for election to the Board at the January 11, 2018 annual general meeting. |
(14) |
The equity value of Bradley S. Shaws holdings is comprised of $1,391,536 for Class A Shares, $249,671,288 for Class B Non-Voting Shares and $204,751 for DSU. |
(15) |
JR Shaw beneficially owns 2,502,762 Class B Non-Voting Shares. In fiscal 2017, JR Shaw joined the Investment Committee of Shaw Family Foundation. Shaw Family Foundation beneficially owns 958,630 Class B Non-Voting Shares and 300,000 options. Although JR Shaw does not beneficially own the 958,630 Class B Non-Voting Shares and 300,000 options held by Shaw Family Foundation, he exercises control or direction over them by serving on the Investment Committee. This information is included solely to provide more fulsome disclosure to shareholders. The equity value of JR Shaws holdings excludes the 958,630 Class B Non-Voting Shares owned by Shaw Family Foundation. |
(16) |
Mr. Vogel recused himself from one of the meetings on account of a possible conflict with a transaction. |
3. |
Appointment of Auditors |
Ernst & Young LLP, Chartered Accountants has been nominated to serve as auditors of the Company to hold office until the next annual general meeting of shareholders of the Company. Upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, the Board and management recommends to shareholders the re-appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Companys auditors.
Audit Fees
The aggregate amounts paid or accrued by the Company with respect to fees payable to Ernst & Young LLP for audit (including separate audits of wholly-owned and non-wholly owned entities, financings, regulatory reporting requirements and Sarbanes-Oxley Act related services), audit-related, tax and other services in the fiscal years ended August 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
Type of Service | Fiscal 2017 | Fiscal 2016 | ||||||
Audit Fees |
$ | 3,569,000 | $ | 4,424,000 | ||||
Audit-related Fees |
$ | 416,000 | $ | 519,000 | ||||
Tax Fees |
$ | 651,000 | $ | 1,326,000 | ||||
Total |
$ | 4,636,000 | $ | 6,269,000 |
Audit-related fees for fiscal 2017 relate to service organization control reports for the Companys data centres that were disposed of during the year, assurance services in respect of an environmental and regulatory report, and financing arrangements and for fiscal 2016 relate to service organization control reports for the Companys data centres, assurance services in respect of an environmental report, and financing arrangements. The tax fees for fiscal 2017 relate to tax advisory services on dispositions, financing arrangements, linear property tax compliance, and general tax advisory services and for fiscal 2016 relate to tax advisory services on acquisitions, dispositions, financing arrangements, linear property tax compliance, and general tax advisory services.
The Audit Committee considered and agreed that the above fees are compatible with maintaining the independence of the Companys auditors. Further, the Audit Committee determined that, in order to ensure the continued independence of the auditors, only limited non-audit services will be provided to the Company by Ernst & Young LLP and in such case, only with the prior approval of the Audit Committee. The Chair of the Audit Committee has been delegated authority to approve the retainer of Ernst & Young LLP to provide non-audit services in extraordinary circumstances where it is not feasible or practical to convene a meeting of the Audit Committee, subject to an aggregate limit of $150,000 in fees payable to Ernst & Young LLP for such services at any time until ratified by the Audit Committee. The Chair of the Audit Committee is required to report any such services approved by him to the Audit Committee.
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
13 |
1. |
Holders of Class A Shares of record at the close of business on November 24, 2017 (the Record Date ) are the only shareholders entitled to vote at the Meeting. Holders of Class B Non-Voting Shares are entitled to attend and speak at the Meeting, but are not entitled to vote on any matter proposed for consideration at the Meeting.
2. |
Holders of Class A Shares who hold shares directly in their own names and not through nominees (such as a bank, securities broker, trustee, trust company or other institution) are registered shareholders.
Voting in Person
Registered holders of Class A Shares may vote their Class A Shares in person at the Meeting. In order to vote in person, a registered holder of Class A Shares should not complete and file a form of proxy as described below.
Voting by Proxy
Registered holders of Class A Shares may vote their Class A Shares by appointing a proxy. Each person named in the form of proxy mailed to registered shareholders is a director or officer of the Company. A registered holder of Class A Shares who wishes to appoint some other person to represent him or her at the Meeting may do so either by inserting the name of that person (who need not be a shareholder) in the space provided in the form of proxy and striking out the names of the specified persons or by completing another form of proxy.
Proxyholder Discretion
Where instructions are specified, the persons named in the form of proxy mailed to registered shareholders will vote the Class A Shares in respect of which they are appointed in accordance with those instructions. In the absence of an instruction, it is intended that such Class A Shares be voted for the adoption of all resolutions referred to in the Notice of Meeting.
The form of proxy mailed to registered shareholders confers discretionary authority with respect to amendments or variations to matters identified in the Notice of Meeting and with respect to other matters which may properly come before the Meeting. At the date of this proxy circular, management of the Company knows of no such amendments, variations or other matters to come before the Meeting other than the matters referred to in the Notice of Meeting. If any such amendment, variation or other matter which is not now known should properly come before the Meeting, then the persons named in the form of proxy will vote on such matters in accordance with their best judgment with respect to the Class A Shares represented by the proxy.
Filing a Proxy
Registered holders of Class A Shares may file their proxy or vote with AST Trust Company (Canada) by using one of the following methods:
Internet: |
www.astvotemyproxy.com | |
Telephone: |
1-888-489-5760 | |
Facsimile: |
1-866-781-3111 (North America) | |
416-368-2502 (outside North America) | ||
Email: |
proxyvote@astfinancial.com | |
Mail: |
AST Trust Company (Canada), P.O. Box 721, Agincourt, Ontario, M1S 0A1 |
14 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
(To file by internet or telephone, a registered holder of Class A Shares will require the control number that is printed on the form of proxy mailed to that shareholder.)
To be valid and acted upon at the Meeting, completed proxies or votes must be received by AST Trust Company (Canada) by 11:00 a.m. (Mountain Time) on Tuesday, January 9, 2018 or, in the case of any adjournment or postponement of the Meeting, at least 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) prior to the time of the adjourned or postponed Meeting. The Chair of the Meeting can waive or extend the time limit for depositing proxies at his or her discretion without notice .
Revocation of Proxy
A shareholder who has given a proxy may revoke it, in any manner permitted by law, including by signing a proxy bearing a later date or a notice of revocation and, in either case, delivering it to the attention of the Corporate Secretary of the Company at its registered office up to the day before the Meeting or to the Chair of the Meeting on the day of the Meeting.
3. |
A holder of Class A Shares through an account in the name of a nominee (such as a bank, securities broker, trustee, trust company or other institution) is a non-registered shareholder. In this case the nominee is listed on a register maintained by the Companys transfer agent and the non-registered shareholder is not. Non-registered shareholders will receive a voting instruction form rather than a form of proxy.
Voting in Person
Non-registered holders of Class A Shares may vote their Class A Shares in person at the Meeting. In order to vote in person, a non-registered holder of Class A Shares should not put voting instructions on the voting instruction form. Instead, that shareholder should write their name in the space provided on the voting instruction form and then sign and return it.
Voting Instruction Form
Each person named as the nominee to attend and act for the non-registered shareholder at the meeting in the voting instruction form mailed to non-registered shareholders is a director and officer of the Company. A non-registered holder of Class A Shares who wishes to appoint some other person to represent him or her at the Meeting may do so by inserting the name of that person (who need not be a shareholder) in the space provided in the voting instruction form and then sign and return it.
Filing Voting Instruction Form or Votes
Non-registered holders of Class A Shares are asked to file their voting instruction form or votes at least one business day before the proxy deposit date noted in the voting instruction form by carefully following the instructions on the voting instruction form provided to the non-registered shareholder and using one of the following methods:
Internet: |
www.proxyvote.com | |
Telephone: |
1-800-474-7493 (English) or 1-800-474-7501 (French) | |
Mail: |
Data Processing Centre, PO Box 2800 Stn Lcd Malton, Mississauga ON L5T 2T7 |
4. |
Registered and non-registered shareholders are entitled to attend the Meeting. Registered and non-registered shareholders will be required to register for the meeting by identifying themselves at the registration desk. All shareholders should be prepared to present valid photo identification on registration and non-registered shareholders should be prepared to present proof of share ownership.
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
15 |
5. |
Only the holders of Class A Shares of record at the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to vote on all matters at the Meeting. Each holder of Class A Shares is entitled to one vote for each such share held. As of November 27, 2017, there were 22,420,064 outstanding Class A Shares.
Voting control of the Company is held by Shaw Family Living Trust ( SFLT ) and its subsidiaries. The sole trustee of SFLT is a private company owned by JR Shaw and having a board comprised of seven directors, including as at November 27, 2017, JR Shaw (Chair), Jim Shaw, Bradley S. Shaw, three other members of JR Shaws family, and one independent director. SFLT and its subsidiaries hold 17,562,400 Class A Shares, representing approximately 78% of the outstanding Class A Shares, for the benefit of descendants of JR and Carol Shaw. JR Shaw controls these shares and 77,000 additional Class A Shares.
The Company has been advised that all of such Class A Shares will be voted in favour of the resolutions referred to in the Notice of the Meeting and therefore anticipates that these resolutions will be approved.
To the knowledge of the directors and executive officers of the Company, no other person beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, or exercises control or direction over, more than 10% of the Class A Shares.
6. |
Holders of Class B Non-Voting Shares are not entitled to vote at meetings of shareholders of the Company, except as provided by law, and will not be entitled to vote on any matter at the Meeting. In the event of a take-over bid, in certain circumstances which are described in the Companys 2017 Annual Information Form, a holder of Class B Non-Voting Shares may be entitled to convert such shares into Class A Shares for purposes of tendering to the take-over bid. As of November 15, 2017, there were 476,455,979 outstanding Class B Non-Voting Shares.
7. |
Interest of Informed Persons in Material Transactions |
Other than as disclosed herein, management of the Company is unaware of any material interest of any director or executive officer of the Company, of any management nominee for election as a director of the Company or of any person who beneficially owns (directly or indirectly) or exercises control or direction over shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to all voting shares of the Company, or any associate or affiliate of any such person, in any transaction since the beginning of the last completed financial year of the Company or in any proposed transaction that has materially affected or would materially affect the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
8. |
Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers |
The following table sets forth the aggregate indebtedness outstanding as at October 31, 2017 , of all directors, executive officers and employees, current or former, of the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
Purpose |
To The Company or its Subsidiaries ($) |
To Another Entity
($) |
||
Shares Purchases |
Nil | Nil | ||
Other |
259,577 | Nil |
16 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
1. |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Under the oversight of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, Shaw takes a comprehensive and strategic approach to executive compensation. Shaws compensation program is designed to attract, retain, motivate, and reward the executive team by aligning managements interest with the Companys objectives and performance.
The Board recognizes the significant contribution of the senior executive team to the growth and success of the Company. In fiscal 2016, Shaw repositioned itself as a leading enhanced connectivity provider through two transformational transactions the acquisition of Freedom Mobile (formerly, WIND Mobile) and the divestiture of Shaw Media. In fiscal 2017, the Company continued its journey towards becoming a leading Canadian connectivity company through:
(i) |
the concurrent announcement of the acquisition of 700 MHz and 2500 MHz wireless spectrum licences from Quebecor Media Inc. (Quebecor) and the sale of ViaWest Inc., and its subsidiaries (collectively ViaWest), to Peak 10 Holding Corporation (Peak 10); and |
(ii) |
continued investment in its converged network. |
In addition to strengthening the long-term strategic positioning of the Company over the last two fiscal years, through coordinated planning and execution, the senior executive team has delivered a balance sheet that is supportive of the level of investment required for long-term growth while remaining committed to an investment grade credit rating and long-term dividend growth.
The following discussion and analysis covers the compensation paid in fiscal 2017 to the Companys Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and the Companys three other most highly compensated officers that is the Companys named executive officers or the NEOs:
|
JR Shaw, Executive Chair |
|
Bradley S. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer |
|
Jay Mehr, President |
|
Vito Culmone, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
|
Trevor English, Executive Vice President & Chief Strategy and Business Development Officer |
Biographical information for JR Shaw and Bradley S. Shaw is included under Election of Directors. Biographical information for Jay Mehr, Vito Culmone and Trevor English is set out below.
Jay Mehr
Jay Mehr serves as President, a position he has held since March 2016. Mr. Mehr is responsible for overseeing all operational and customer-facing areas of the business, including Shaw Consumer, Business Network Services and Wireless. Mr. Mehr has also held a number of operational leadership roles over his 21 years with the Company, including Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer; Senior Vice President, Operations; Group Vice President, Operations, Shaw Cable; Vice President, Operations; and regional manager roles in British Columbia and Ontario. Mr. Mehr holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Alberta.
Vito Culmone
Vito Culmone serves as Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held since June 1, 2015. In addition to his financial accountabilities, Mr. Culmone is also responsible for Real Estate and the Strategic Projects Office. By bringing together these areas, Mr. Culmone provides oversight for the prioritization and planning of initiatives to ensure the necessary financial performance. Mr. Culmone has more than 27 years of experience as a financial professional, including 17 years as a senior financial executive.
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
17 |
Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Culmone served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of WestJet Airlines Ltd. He has also held leadership positions at Molson Inc. and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Culmone holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Toronto and is a Chartered Professional Accountant.
Trevor English
Trevor English serves as Executive Vice President & Chief Strategy and Business Development Officer, a position he has held since March 2016. Mr. English is accountable for strategic planning, business development, investor relations, Shaw Ventures and investment initiatives. Mr. English has also served as a member of the Board of Directors of Corus Entertainment Inc. since April 2016. Mr. English has been with the Company since 2004 and prior to joining Shaw he worked for CIBC World Markets Inc. in Canada and the United Kingdom. Mr. English has 20 years of experience in corporate finance, mergers & acquisitions, investor relations, business development and financial analysis. Mr. English holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from the University of Calgary and a Chartered Financial Analyst designation.
Governance and Decision Making
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is responsible for the Boards oversight of compensation, succession and development of the Companys senior leadership team. More specifically, the committee is responsible for ensuring that effective human resource programs and philosophies are developed and implemented in conformity with the Companys vision, values and strategic objectives to continue to ensure the recruitment and retention of high quality talent at all levels.
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is comprised of four independent directors: Willard H. Yuill (Chair), Lynda Haverstock, Gregg Keating and JC Sparkman. The members of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee have:
|
a thorough understanding of policies, principles, and governance related to human resources and executive compensation; and |
|
many years of board, executive and other diverse business experience gained through involvement with public and private enterprises that are involved in telecommunications and other industries in Canada or the United States. |
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is governed by a charter which details its mandate, composition and responsibilities. The responsibilities of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee are described under Statement of Corporate Governance Human Resources and Compensation Committee. A copy of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee charter is also available at www.shaw.ca .
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee met six times in fiscal 2017. At its invitation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Willis Towers Watson Public Limited Company (Willis Towers Watson), the Companys compensation consultant, joined committee meetings. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee reviews the compensation of each vice president level officer and above, including annual salary, short-term incentive target and payout and long-term incentives. This review includes inputs and recommendations from management and the Companys compensation consultant and consideration of the Companys Executive Compensation Guiding Principles & Philosophy which is discussed below.
In fiscal 2017, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee identified the following three corporate performance measures to assess corporate performance: (1) operating income before restructuring costs and amortization 1 , (2) free cash flow 1 , and (3) Consumer & Wireless revenue generating units (RGUs) 1 , with each of these measures equally weighted at 20%.
1 |
See definition and discussion under Key Performance Drivers in the Companys managements discussion and analysis for the year ended August 31, 2017. |
18 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee annually reviews managements recommendations for corporate performance criteria and assesses this performance relative to the Companys strategic plan, as well as approving individual performance metrics for the senior executive team. For fiscal 2018, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee has agreed that corporate performance will be assessed relative to the following two corporate performance measures: (i) operating income before restructuring costs and amortization (ii) RGU net gain 1 , each equally weighted. For the NEOs (except tor JR Shaw 2 ), (i) and (ii) are equally weighted at: (a) 50% for Bradley S. Shaw and Jay Mehr and (b) 40% for Vito Culmone and Trevor English. (See Statement of Compensation Fiscal 2018). For each NEO, the committee makes a recommendation to the Board for its approval as to base pay, short-term incentive targets, short-term payout amounts and other compensation matters.
Executive Compensation Guiding Principles & Philosophy
The Companys executive compensation philosophy is grounded in three guiding principles as outlined below.
1. |
Align executive compensation with the execution of the Companys business strategies and overall business performance. This principle is achieved by: |
|
encouraging executives to build value for shareholders, customers, employees and community stakeholders over the short, medium and long-term; |
|
considering both quantitative and qualitative performance factors to maintain a balanced approach to assessing individual and team performance; and |
|
rewarding overall performance Shaws incentive structure is designed to ensure that all employees are focused on accelerating performance and results that contribute to Shaws overall success. |
Success requires that Shaw maintain a balance between the competing challenges of growth, investments in its network and other technology developments, regulatory compliance, competition, management of talent and leadership and the general economic environment. This requires:
|
annually reviewing and assessing compensation practices to ensure that they align with the business strategy and performance; |
|
assuring management maintains its focus, knowledge, stability and experience in order to execute business strategies in an intensely competitive environment with rapidly evolving technology; and |
|
making capital allocation decisions involving major long-term capital investments which shape and determine future growth and profitability. |
2. |
Provide a combination of compensation elements, including fixed elements that provide security and enable the Company to attract and retain key employees and at risk elements that reflect their ability to influence business outcomes and performance. These elements include: |
|
base salaries, which provide a fixed level of compensation to attract and retain top executives; |
|
incentive plan payouts that reflect corporate and individual performance to motivate our leaders to deliver results based on corporate strategies and sustain long-term corporate success; |
|
a limited perquisite package, which includes annual executive medical exams; |
|
retirement plans that help attract and retain our senior leaders; and |
|
an incentive program that encourages both mid and long term strategic and business performance. |
3. |
Ensure that Shaws executive compensation practices are market competitive and designed to attract, retain and motivate high calibre leaders. Shaw measures total compensation (including at risk performance pay) relative to a group of comparators (see discussion of peer group under Benchmarking Compensation). |
2 |
JR Shaws bonus is calculated and paid pursuant to the provisions of the agreement between the Company and JR Shaw. (See Statement of Compensation Employment Contracts). |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
19 |
Operating Highlights for Fiscal 2017
In fiscal 2017, the Company continued its journey towards becoming a leading Canadian connectivity company by executing on the following key priorities:
|
The concurrent announcement of the acquisition of 700 MHz and 2500 MHz wireless spectrum licences from Quebecor and the sale of ViaWest to Peak 10 |
|
As at August 31, 2017, the Company had a net debt leverage ratio 3 of 1.9x, approximately $500 million cash on hand, and its $1.5 billion bank credit facility was fully undrawn providing a strong balance sheet position to support the Companys growth initiatives |
|
Changing the trajectory of its Consumer RGU performance with 25,000 net adds in fiscal 2017, a substantial turnaround over the 170,000 RGU net loss in fiscal 2016. The Company also continued to grow wireless subscribers with a net gain of 103,000 RGUs in fiscal 2017. |
|
Delivering fiscal 2017 year-end financial results that achieved its revised guidance, after adjusting for discontinued operations: |
|
Operating income before restructuring costs and amortization of $1,997 million was within the target range of $1,989 $2,014 million; |
|
Capital expenditures of $1,225 million was below the target of $1,236 million; and |
|
Free cash flow of $438 million exceeded the target of $400 million. |
|
Launching the Freedom Mobile brand and improving its wireless network performance with the rollout of the LTE-Advanced network to all its existing markets, on schedule and on budget. Freedom Mobiles handset lineup continued to expand in fiscal 2017, currently with a total of 14 handsets that are compatible with its AWS-3 LTE network, including Apple, LG, Samsung, Sony and ZTE. |
|
Continuing to drive WideOpen Internet 150s momentum by pairing it with expanded 2-year value plans and unlimited data allowing our customers to stream worry free at an affordable price with cost certainty |
|
Launching the market leading, BlueSky TV which is based on the Comcast Corporations X1 video platform. |
|
BlueSky TV was launched in phases, with the initial Calgary launch in January followed by the Vancouver launch in February and the national launch in April. |
|
The deployment of its newest generation of cable modem termination system equipment referred to as the Converged Cable Access Platform (CCAP) into its serving hubs. CCAP significantly enhances the capabilities of our cable network and enables Shaw to leverage the next generation of cable access technology known as Data Over Cable Interface Specification version 3.1 (DOCSIS 3.1). DOCSIS 3.1 represents the latest development in a set of technologies that increase the capability of a hybrid fibre-coax network to transmit data both to and from customer premises |
|
As of August 31, 2017, DOCSIS ready (CCAP) infrastructure was running in Shaws major systems. All remaining systems are expected to be running DOCSIS 3.1 ready (CCAP) infrastructure by the end of fiscal 2018. |
|
On December 15, 2016, the Company extended the term of its five-year $1.5 billion bank credit facility from December 2019 to December 2021. This credit facility is used for working capital and general corporate purposes. |
|
The Company conducted a number of capital market activities, including: |
|
the extension of its dividend reinvestment plan in respect of its Class A Participating Shares and Class B Non-Voting Participating Shares to eligible shareholders who are residents of the United States; |
|
the issuance of 3.80% $300 million senior unsecured notes due March 1, 2027; |
|
the repayment of $400 million senior unsecured notes due March 2, 2017; and |
|
the repayment of US$846 million in borrowings under the Companys and ViaWests credit facilities related to the sale of ViaWest. |
3 |
Net debt leverage ratio is net debt to adjusted operating income before restructuring costs and amortization. (See definition and discussion under Key Performance Drivers and Liquidity and Capital Resources in the Companys managements discussion and analysis for the year ended August 31, 2017). |
20 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
|
On June 1, 2017, the Company announced that it entered into an agreement to sell a group of assets comprising the operations of Shaw Tracking, a fleet tracking operation, to Omnitracs Canada for proceeds of approximately US$20 million. The transaction closed on September 15, 2017. |
|
The Company continued to expand its Shaw Go WiFi build-out. As at August 31, 2017, the Company had approximately 100,000 Shaw Go WiFi access points installed and operating throughout the network and over 3.3 million devices using Shaw Go WiFi. Moreover, the Company has leveraged its Wi-Fi access points to improve network coverage for Freedom Mobile customers which represents an important step in our converged network strategy. |
Benchmarking Compensation
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee annually reviews the total compensation of the Companys senior executives and compensation practices of the Company. As part of that review, the peer group is reviewed to ensure a balance of relevant peer organizations in terms of business commonalities and the market for executive talent.
The Human Resource and Compensation Committee retained Willis Towers Watson to complete annual market reviews for the Companys NEOs and to validate and identify potential changes to the comparator group of companies.
The Companys fiscal 2017 benchmarking review of executive compensation entailed a competitive analysis undertaken by Willis Towers Watson which included total compensation for the Companys NEOs with that for the comparator group in the following specific areas:
|
base salary |
|
short and medium-term incentives |
|
long-term incentives |
|
retirement plans and benefits |
In partnership with Willis Towers Watson, Shaw has developed a comparator group that reflects a simplified approach which uses one group (no sub-groups or secondary groups). The comparator group aligns with peer companies that were selected to provide comparable representation of industry (cable & satellite, integrated and wireless telecommunications services and comparison broadcast industries), size (revenue and assets), and business complexity. To reflect the western Canadian market in which the majority of the Companys executives reside, the peer group also includes organizations in the Canadian energy and industrial sectors that have comparable revenue, assets and market capitalization relative to the Company. The comparator group changed from fiscal 2016 to 2017, Cablevision Systems Corporation and CBS Corporation were removed reflecting Shaws divestiture of the Media business and Charter Communications Inc. and Discovery Communications were also removed due to recent merger activity which resulted in the two entities no longer meeting the size criteria for the comparator group.
For fiscal 2017, the comparator group included the following 13 Canadian and 4 U.S. companies:
Canadian Comparators | U.S. Comparators | |||
BCE Inc. |
Quebecor Inc. | Dish Network Corp. | ||
Canadian Pacific Railway Limited |
Rogers Communications Inc. | Frontier Communications Corp. | ||
Canadian Tire Corp. |
Sirius XM Radio Inc. | Telephone & Data Systems Inc. | ||
Crescent Point Energy Corp. |
Teck Resources Limited | Windstream Corporation | ||
EnCana Corporation |
TELUS Corporation | |||
Fortis Inc. |
||||
Pembina Pipeline Corporation |
||||
Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc. |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
21 |
Engagement of Compensation Consultant
In addition to the services provided by Willis Towers Watson, the Company retained Mercer (Canada) Limited (Mercer), a wholly owned subsidiary of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., to provide other services during fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 that were not related to executive and/or director compensation which included (without being limited to) pension actuarial and administrative services for defined benefit pension plans. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is not required to pre-approve such other services that Mercer or its affiliates provide to the Company at the request of management.
Aggregate fees paid to Mercer and Willis Towers Watson are listed below:
Note:
(1) |
All Other Fees are comprised of fees related to pension administration and actuarial valuations |
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has considered Willis Tower Watsons analysis and advice as well as other specific factors the Human Resources and Compensation Committee deemed to be appropriate and relevant.
Risk Considerations in Executive Compensation
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the Companys compensation practices to ensure they do not encourage executives to take risks that could have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has considered the risk profile of the Companys compensation program and confirmed that it does not believe that the compensation program encourages excessive or inappropriate risk taking.
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee also consults with Willis Towers Watson as to the level of risk in the Companys compensation program. Components of the Companys compensation program are designed to address risk as follows:
|
base salary is fixed to provide steady income regardless of share price and therefore does not encourage excessive risk-taking; |
|
the pay mix is set to balance short, medium and long-term rewards; |
|
short-term incentive plan payout amounts are linked to performance and are only paid out on the approval of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee and the Board for the NEOs; and |
|
equity awards are only issued on a periodic basis and they vest over an extended period which helps to ensure that performance aligns with shareholders interests. |
The Company has adopted a formal policy restricting reporting insiders (which includes NEOs and directors) from purchasing financial instruments such as prepaid variable forward contracts, puts, calls, equity swaps, collars, or units of exchange funds that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in market value of their equity based securities granted as compensation (stock options, RSUs, PSUs, and DSUs) or held, directly or indirectly, by the NEO or director.
Claw backs
Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the CEO and CFO of Shaw are subject to a statutory claw back in the event of misconduct which results in a required restatement of any financial reporting required under securities laws.
22 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
Management of Talent & Leadership Development
As the Company continues to grow, there has been an increased focus on succession planning and talent development together with the enhancement of formal leadership programs. The Companys succession planning review identifies high performers as well as successors for key positions for all roles from director level to the Chief Executive Officer. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is responsible for succession planning and oversees the Companys succession planning review. The results are reviewed at least annually with the Board.
This formal process reviews potential successions and gaps for senior leadership roles together with detailed action plans to support the ongoing development of high potential talent within the Company. Retention of senior leaders is also critical, particularly given that the Company runs with a lean team of talented individuals.
The Companys short-term incentive program includes leaders across all divisions. Through this program each employee that is manager level and above prepares a performance management plan with clear business objectives, measurable individual performance metrics and a personal leadership development plan.
The development, retention and acquisition of key leadership talent is a focus at all levels. During the year, the Company continued delivering a leader of leaders program aimed at enhancing the leadership and business acumen for all directors and managers. The leader of leaders program is a twelve day six module course that has been designed and facilitated in partnership with the University of Calgary Haskayne School of Business and Development Dimensions Incorporated, a global leader in designing leadership development programs.
The Company also focuses on employee engagement in order to identify initiatives that it can take to better motivate its employees to perform. The Company continues to make improvements and an ongoing commitment to measure engagement through a recurring, real-time employee listening program.
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
23 |
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative five year return of the Class B Non-Voting Shares (assuming $100 invested on August 31, 2012 and reinvestment of dividends) with the S&P/TSX Composite Total Return Index for the period from August 31, 2012 to August 31, 2017.
Relative Total Return Performance
Shaw Communications Inc. vs. S&P/TSX Composite Total Return Index
August 31, 2012 to August 31, 2017
With the exception of fiscal 2012 4 , the aggregate compensation of the NEOs (excluding any signing or retirement payments) did not materially change from fiscal 2012 to 2015 while the market price of the Companys Non-Voting Class B shares increased. In fiscal 2016, the market price of the Companys Non-Voting Class B shares increased while NEO compensation declined resulting primarily from a new mix of NEOs and the 20% voluntary reduction in base salary by JR Shaw, Bradley S. Shaw, and Jay Mehr as well as a bonus reduction for JR Shaw for a number of reasons, including the divesture of the former Media division which resulted in lower free cash flow as the Company repositioned itself for growth with its new mix of assets. In fiscal 2017, the market price of the Companys Non-Voting Class B shares increased and the NEO compensation increased slightly compared to the prior year due to the pension adjustment for Bradley S. Shaw in fiscal 2016.
Overall, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee is confident that the current executive compensation program and associated pay levels for its NEOs are well aligned with the Companys performance over the past five-year period.
4 |
Total Compensation of the NEOs enrolled in the SERP Plan decreased substantially in fiscal 2012 due to a SERP plan amendment that fixed the base salary portion of the pensionable earnings at the 2012 salary levels which generally caused a negative overall amount to be reported for pension component of total compensation. |
24 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
Executive Compensation Elements
The Elements of the Companys compensation program are described below.
Type of Compensation |
Form of Payment |
Performance Period |
Method of Determining
Compensation |
Objectives | ||||
Base Salary | Cash | Annual review |
Corporate and individual
performance |
Attract and retain
high calibre executives |
||||
Short and Medium-term Incentive |
Cash
Restricted Share Units
Performance Share Units (PSUs) |
Annual
RSUs & PSUs terms set by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee |
Based on corporate and
individual performance |
Motivate executives to achieve
annual performance goals Attract and retain executives |
||||
Long-term Incentives | Stock Options |
Periodic payments with annual
grant program commencing fiscal 2016 (generally, 10 year term, with vesting over 5 years) |
Approved by the Human
Resources and Compensation Committee |
Motivate executives
to drive long-term performance and return to shareholders Attract and retain executives |
||||
Pension (1) |
Company Defined
Contribution Plan (CDCP) |
On-going |
Approved by the Human
Resources and Compensation Committee based on retention and comparator analysis |
Attract and retain key
executives |
||||
Executive Retirement Plan (ERP) |
On-going |
|||||||
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) |
Closed to new members |
|||||||
Benefits |
Same as employee
benefits |
On-going |
Based on market value and
competitiveness |
Maintains engaged and
healthy executives |
||||
Perquisites | Executive medical | Annual |
Based on market
competitiveness |
Note:
(1) |
See discussion under Pension Plans. |
Base Salary
Base salary is designed to provide a level of fixed compensation that is determined at the beginning of each fiscal year. It is reviewed annually taking into account changes in market conditions, changes in level and scope of responsibility and accountabilities of each role.
Base salary for the NEOs is typically above the median of the comparator group (approximately 75th to 90th percentile). The Company and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee has determined to pay above the median of competitor group to ensure that the Company attracts and retains high calibre executives in the communications industry.
Base salary for the majority of executives in the organization has been frozen for the past five years with changes only as a result of substantial role changes or promotions as the Company shifts a higher portion of the executive compensation to at risk elements. Effective March 8, 2016, JR Shaw, Bradley S. Shaw and Jay Mehr voluntarily reduced their base salaries by 20% for a number of reasons, including the divesture of the former Media division which resulted in lower recurring free cash flow as the Company repositioned itself for growth with its core mix of assets.
The following table outlines changes to base salary earned from the previous year.
NEO | Fiscal 2017 | Fiscal 2016 | ||||||
JR Shaw, Executive Chair (1) |
$ | 1,200,000 | $ | 1,355,682 | ||||
Bradley S. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer (2) |
$ | 2,000,000 | $ | 2,259,470 | ||||
Jay Mehr, President (3) |
$ | 1,320,000 | $ | 1,491,250 | ||||
Vito Culmone, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (4) |
$ | 1,250,000 | $ | 1,208,333 | ||||
Trevor English, Executive Vice President & Chief Strategy and Business Development Officer (5) |
$ | 900,000 | $ | 822,159 |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
25 |
Notes:
(1) |
Effective March 8, 2016, JR Shaw voluntarily reduced his base salary by 20% to $1,200,000. The base salary of $1,355,682 reported for fiscal 2016 is a prorated amount. |
(2) |
Effective March 8, 2016, Bradley S. Shaw voluntarily reduced his base salary by 20% to $2,000,000. The base salary of $2,259,470 reported for fiscal 2016 is a prorated amount. |
(3) |
Effective March 8, 2016, Jay Mehr voluntarily reduced his base salary by 20% to $1,320,000. The base salary of $1,491,250 reported for fiscal 2016 is a prorated amount. |
(4) |
Vito Culmone joined the Company on June 1, 2015. Effective October 1, 2015, Mr. Culmones base salary was increased to $1,250,000. The base salary of $1,208,333 reported for fiscal 2016 is a prorated amount. |
(5) |
Effective March 8, 2016, Trevor Englishs base salary was increased to $900,000. The base salary of $822,159 reported for fiscal 2016 is a prorated amount. |
Short and Medium-term Incentives
The Companys compensation structure evolved in fiscal 2017 with a number of changes to further support several business objectives. For fiscal 2017, pay-for-performance was extended to all leaders at manager level and above with the following weighting given to the metrics:
|
Corporate Performance 60% focused on three measures: (i) operating income before restructuring costs and amortization (ii) free cash flow and (iii) Consumer & Wireless RGUs each equally weighted at 20% |
|
Individual Performance 20% based on the achievement of key operating metrics |
|
Commitments and Leadership 20% based on achievement of commitments and leadership attributes |
Based on fiscal 2017 performance, the average short-term incentive plan payout for all Shaw leadership levels was at 100% of target compared to an average short-term incentive plan payout for all leadership levels of 90% of target for fiscal 2016.
Short-term incentive payout amounts for fiscal 2017 and fiscal 2016 are illustrated in the table below.
NEO | Fiscal 2017 (1) | Fiscal 2016 (1) | ||||||
JR Shaw, Executive Chair (2) |
$ | 9,600,000 | $ | 9,600,000 | ||||
Bradley S. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer |
$ | 5,566,000 | $ | 5,009,400 | ||||
Jay Mehr, President |
$ | 3,289,000 | $ | 2,960,160 | ||||
Vito Culmone, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
$ | 1,800,000 | $ | 1,820,000 | ||||
Trevor English, Executive Vice President & Chief Strategy and Business Development Officer |
$ | 800,000 | $ | 720,000 |
Notes:
(1) |
Fiscal 2016 was paid out at 90% of target and fiscal 2017 was paid out at 100% of target. |
(2) |
In fiscal 2016 and 2017, JR Shaws bonus represented approximately 0.5% and 0.54%, respectively of the Income Base. |
Corporate Performance Measures
Under the direction of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, short, medium and long-term incentives are determined by reviewing the performance of the Company and individual performance. Short term incentive plan payout amounts are based on achievement of established corporate and individual performance and achievement of commitments and leadership attributes.
26 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
The following table details the rationale as to how the above quantitative performance measures affect pay decisions for the fiscal 2017 short-term incentive plan payout payments. In addition, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee considers various qualitative performance factors including other business initiatives and strategic transactions.
Payout Range | Weighting |
Fiscal 2017
Payout |
||||||||
Corporate Performance Objectives |
||||||||||
1. Operating income before restructuring costs and amortization |
Maximum payment is 120% of corporate performance target achievement No payment if less than 50% of corporate performance target are not met |
|
20 |
% |
|
19.3 |
% |
|||
2 Free cash flow |
20 | % | 21.4 | % | ||||||
3. Consumer & Wireless RGUs
|
20 | % | 19.3 | % | ||||||
Individual Performance Objectives
|
||||||||||
1 to 2 metrics approved by direct leader |
Maximum payment is 120% of individual performance target achieved No payment if individual performance targets are not met |
20 | % | 20.0 | % | |||||
Discretionary Performance
|
||||||||||
Compensation based on individual performance |
Maximum payment is 120% of individual performance target achievement No payment if individual performance targets are not met |
20 | % | 20.0 | % |
a. |
Operating Income before Restructuring Costs and Amortization |
Operating income before restructuring costs and amortization and the ability to grow this financial measure is one of the key financial metrics driving the valuation of the Company. Targets set at the outset of fiscal 2017 included 12-months of Shaws former Business Infrastructure Services division and Shaw Tracking business operating income before restructuring costs and amortization. As a result of the divestitures and their impact on results, the Company assessed actual operating income before restructuring costs and amortization performance against fiscal 2017 targets adjusted to exclude the results of the discontinued operations. Operating income before restructuring costs and amortization for fiscal 2017 was $1.997 billion, which reflects a 97% payout relative to the adjusted operating income before restructuring costs and amortization target.
b. |
Free Cash Flow |
Free cash flow is a key component of the Companys overall business performance, which supports return of capital initiatives to shareholders and debt reduction, as required. The Company recognizes that free cash flow may fluctuate year-to-year, as capital investments are made to develop and grow the business and as extraneous factors arise. The Company assessed actual free cash flow results against the target set at the outset of fiscal 2017. Free cash flow for fiscal 2017 was $438 million, which reflects a 107% payout based on the original target and payout grid.
c. |
Consumer & Wireless RGUs |
RGUs are calculated as the number of products sold to customers. For fiscal 2017, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee and the Board approved a target level for the change in Consumer & Wireless RGUs for fiscal 2017 and this target was achieved. As at August 31, 2017, the Consumer & Wireless had approximately 6,378,500 RGUs. During fiscal 2017 Consumer & Wireless RGUs increased by approximately 129,200. This reflects a 97% payout based on the target and payout grid set at the outset of the year.
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
27 |
Fiscal 2018
For fiscal 2018, pay-for-performance will continue to be extended to all leaders and eligible employees with the weighting between company and individual performance differentiated based on leadership level and ability to influence company performance:
|
Company Performance focused on achieving targets of two measures: (i) operating income before restructuring costs and amortization and (ii) RGU net gain each equally weighted. For the NEOs (except for JR Shaw 5 ), (i) and (ii) are equally weighted at (a) 50% for Bradley S. Shaw and Jay Mehr and (b) 40% for Vito Culmone and Trevor English. |
|
Individual Performance equally weighted between (i) behaviours and (ii) achievement of commitments. For the NEOs (except for JR Shaw 5 , Bradley S. Shaw and Jay Mehr), (i) and (ii) equally weighted at 10% for Mr. Culmone and Mr. English. |
Restricted Share Units
The Company adopted a Restricted Share Unit Plan under which RSUs may be granted, solely at the discretion of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, at a value equal to the five-day average of the closing price of one Class B Non-Voting Share on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) prior to the grant date (the Market Value) for each RSU. The payout date(s) of the RSUs in a grant are set by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee at the time of grant (generally one to three years after grant date). On each dividend payment date for the Class B Non-Voting Shares, additional RSUs are credited to the holders RSU account equal to, for each RSU, the amount of the per Class B Non-Voting Share dividend divided by the then current Market Value of a Class B Non-Voting Share provided the holder is still employed on such date. On the payout date, all RSUs with that payout date will become payable by cash payment equal to the then current market value of a Class B Non-Voting Share for each such RSU. For eligible NEOs, the value of RSUs represents 20% of their total annual short term incentive payment.
Performance Share Units
In fiscal 2016, the Company introduced a Performance Share Unit Plan under which PSUs may be granted, solely at the discretion of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, at a value equal to the Market Value of one Class B Non-Voting Share for each PSU. The payout date(s) of PSUs and performance criteria of the PSUs in a grant are set by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee at the time of grant. A minimum level of performance must be achieved, otherwise the payout is zero, while maximum performance is capped at 150%. On each dividend payment date for the Class B Non-Voting Shares, additional PSUs are credited to the holders PSU account equal to, for each PSU, the amount of the per Class B Non-Voting Share dividend divided by the then current Market Value of a Class B Non-Voting Share provided the holder is still employed on such date. On the payout date, all PSUs will become payable by cash payment equal to the then current market value of a Class B Non-Voting Share for each such PSU provided that all of the performance criteria set by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee on the grant date of the PSUs are met.
Long-term Incentives
The purpose of the long-term at-risk compensation is to provide additional compensation on a periodic basis to ensure a continued balanced performance focus with the overall objective of creating shareholder value. The benefits of option awards require sustained performance through effective execution of the Companys strategic initiatives.
Stock option awards are discretionary and are granted by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee from time to time. When stock options are granted, the Companys current practice is to award options for terms of ten years with 20% of the options in a grant vesting on each of the first through fifth anniversaries of the grant date.
5 |
JR Shaws bonus is calculated and paid pursuant to the provisions of the agreement between the Company and JR Shaw. (See Statement of Compensation Employment Contracts). |
28 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
The Company has preferred to reward executive performance through the short-term incentive program and, as a result, longer-term incentives such as stock option awards were limited. This decision is, in part, based on the significant equity ownership of two of its NEOs that are members of the Shaw family, which controls the Company through its holdings of Class A Shares and holds a significant interest in Class B Non-Voting Shares (see Voting Shares and Principal Holders Thereof).
Stock Option Plan
Options to acquire Class B Non-Voting Shares are granted pursuant to the Companys stock option plan. The stock option plan of the Company provides that options may be granted to directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company and for such number of Class B Non-Voting Shares as the Board, or a committee thereof, determines in its discretion, at an exercise price not less than the closing price of the Class B Non-Voting Shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) on the trading day immediately preceding the date on which the options are granted. An option shall not be immediately exercisable, but rather, shall be exercisable on vesting dates determined by the Board from time to time; provided that the Board may not grant options with vesting terms more favourable than 50% of the original grant on each of the first and second anniversary dates. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, options expire ten years from the date of grant, and subject to limited exceptions, must be exercised while the optionee is a director, officer, employee or consultant of the Company (or within 90 days thereafter). Provision is made in the plan for early termination of options in the event of death or cessation of employment or service arrangement (other than disability or retirement), as the case may be. Options are not transferable or assignable, unless the transfer or assignment is permitted under applicable securities laws and is in respect of options to purchase 10,000 Class B Non-Voting Shares or greater; and provided further that such transfer or assignment is approved by two senior officers of the Company, one of whom must be either the Chief Executive Officer or the Chief Financial Officer of the Company.
The plan provides that: (i) the maximum number of Class B Non-Voting Shares which may be reserved for issuance to insiders of the Company under the plan and all other security based compensation arrangements of the Company is limited to 10% of the number of Class B Non-Voting Shares outstanding at the date of grant (on a non-diluted basis) and (ii) the maximum number of Class B Non-Voting Shares which may be issued to insiders of the Company under the plan and all other security based compensation arrangements of the Company within a one year period is limited to 10% of the number of Class B Non-Voting Shares outstanding at the time of the issuance (on a non-diluted basis). Subject to applicable law and approval of the Board, the Company may provide financial assistance in connection with the exercise of an option, with recourse to the Class B Non-Voting Shares purchased upon such exercise. The plan contains anti-dilution, other adjustment and change of control provisions.
The Companys option plan is the only compensation plan under which it is authorized to issue equity securities. The maximum number of Class B Non-Voting Shares issuable under the stock option plan may not exceed 52,000,000 Class B Non-Voting Shares (being 10.5% of the aggregate number of Class A and B Non-Voting Shares issued and outstanding as at August 31, 2017). As at August 31, 2017, 10,156,205 Class B Non-Voting Shares were issuable on exercise of outstanding options (being 2.0% of the aggregate number of Class A Shares and Class B Non-Voting Shares then issued and outstanding) and 6,127,175 Class B Non-Voting Shares were available for future grant of options under the stock option plan (being 1.2% of the aggregate number of Class A Shares and Class B Non-Voting Shares then issued and outstanding). During fiscal 2017, the Company granted options to purchase 2,923,000 Class B Non-Voting Shares (being 0.6% of the aggregate number of Class A Shares and Class B Non-Voting Shares outstanding as at August 31, 2017).
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
29 |
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Plan Category |
Number of securities issuable on exercise of outstanding options |
Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options |
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plan |
|||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders |
10,156,205 | $ | 24.45 | 6,127,175 |
Retirement Plans and Benefits
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee approves participation in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ( SERP ) and the Executive Retirement Plan ( ERP ) for senior executives of the organization (including the NEOs). These plans are designed to reflect the significant contributions that senior executives have made and are expected to make to the Company. The SERP was established in 2001 and closed to new members in June 2012. The ERP was established in 2013. The NEOs also participate in the Company Defined Contribution Plan ( CDCP ) which is available to all eligible employees. The ERP, the SERP and CDCP are described under Pension Plans. These plans reflect the Companys preference to deliver competitive compensation through elements other than equity-based awards.
The NEOs participate in the same group benefit plans as all other employees with the exception of JR Shaw and Bradley S. Shaw.
Employee Share Purchase Plan
An employee share purchase plan (the ESPP ) was introduced in 1998 to provide employees of the Company with an incentive to increase the profitability of the Company and a means to participate in that increased profitability.
Generally, all non-unionized full-time or part-time employees of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries are eligible to enroll in the ESPP. Executive officers of the Company, including the NEOs, are entitled to participate in the ESPP on the same basis as all other employees of the Company.
Under the ESPP, each participant contributes through payroll deductions up to a maximum of 5% of the participants monthly base compensation and the Company matches with a contribution equal to one quarter of the participants contribution for those participants with less than ten years of service and one third of the participants contribution for those participants with greater than ten years of service. Canadian Western Trust Company, as trustee under the ESPP, or its nominee acquires Class B Non-Voting Shares for the benefit of participants through the facilities of the TSX using monies contributed to the ESPP. A participant may withdraw up to 100% of the shares vested in his or her account up to two times in any 12-month period.
As of August 31, 2017, approximately 71% of eligible employees of the Company participated in the ESPP. At August 31, 2017, an aggregate of 3.25 million Class B Non-Voting Shares were held under the ESPP.
Stock ownership guidelines
Currently, the Company has not adopted guidelines that require minimum levels of share ownership for the NEOs. Since two of the NEOs are members of the Shaw family, there is significant stock ownership among the NEOs as a whole. The Company does not require NEOs to hold stock options after they vest for any particular period of time.
Employment Contracts
In 1997, the Company entered into an agreement with its Executive Chair, JR Shaw, which provides for, among other things, an annual incentive bonus. The agreement recognizes JR Shaws central role in founding and building the Company and ensures that the Company retains and utilizes the full benefits of his 50 years
30 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
of industry experience. As Executive Chair, JR Shaw continues to provide broad stewardship and strategic vision for the Company. In addition, his stature as a national corporate leader and his positive long-standing reputation with government, regulatory, investor and banking communities enhances the Companys capacity to achieve its strategic and financial goals.
The agreement with JR Shaw provides for an incentive bonus that is paid to him annually, provided the Company reaches its financial targets. The agreement also specifies that the amount is to be between 0.5% and 1.0% of the Companys operating income before restructuring costs and amortization (as reported in the Companys annual consolidated financial statements) calculated excluding the results of Shaw Direct (the Income Base ) for the year in which it is to be paid. In 2017, JR Shaw received a bonus of $9.6 million which represented approximately 0.54% of the Income Base.
The Company has no change of control or termination agreement with any NEO.
2. |
Summary Compensation Table |
The following table sets forth compensation earned during the last three financial years of the Company by the NEOs.
Name and Principal Position | Year |
Salary $ |
Share
$ |
Option
$ |
Non-Equity
Annual Incentive Plan Compensation (4) $ |
Pension
$ |
All Other
$ |
Total
Compensation $ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
JR Shaw (14) |
2017 | 1,200,000 | | | 9,600,000 | (7) | | 283,200 | 11,083,200 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Chair |
2016 | 1,355,682 | (13) | | | 9,600,000 | (7) | | 252,569 | 11,208,251 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 1,500,000 | | | 10,039,293 | (7) | 1,298,000 | 346,420 | 13,183,713 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bradley Shaw (14) |
2017 | 2,000,000 | 1,391,500 | 106,200 | 5,566,000 | 2,475,230 | 432,209 | 11,971,139 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
2016 | 2,259,470 | (13) | 1,252,360 | 90,600 | 5,009,400 | (1,701,990 | ) | 327,648 | 7,237,528 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 2,500,000 | | | 5,913,875 | 4,273,370 | 453,990 | 13,141,235 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jay Mehr |
2017 | 1,320,000 | 822,250 | 88,500 | 3,289,000 | 4,514,230 | 49,913 | 10,083,893 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
President |
2016 | 1,491,250 | (13) | 740,040 | 75,500 | 2,960,160 | 2,828,010 | 94,106 | 8,189,066 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2015 | 1,650,000 | | | 3,417,900 | 3,912,370 | 144,237 | 9,124,507 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vito Culmone |
2017 | 1,250,000 | 450,000 | 70,800 | 1,800,000 | 962,000 | 32,922 | 4,565,722 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President |
2016 | 1,208,333 | 455,000 | 60,400 | 1,820,000 | 799,833 | 67,508 | 4,411,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
& Chief Financial Officer |
2015 | 250,000 | | 291,000 | (9) | 1,000,000 | 234,000 | 500,000 | (10) | 2,275,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Trevor English (14) |
2017 | 900,000 | 380,000 | (8) | 53,100 | 800,000 | 730,000 | 2,047,493 | (12) | 4,910,593 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President |
2016 | 822,159 | 360,000 | (8) | 30,200 | 720,000 | 706,216 | 3,049,466 | (12) | 5,688,041 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
& Chief Strategy and Business |
2015 | 638,542 | | 179,760 | (11) | 801,000 | 388,954 | | 2,008,256 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Officer |
Notes:
(1) |
Amounts reported in fiscal 2017 and 2016 include the grant date fair value of the award of RSUs. The fair value is determined based on the average of the closing prices of the Class B Non-Voting Shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the TSX) for the five trading days preceding the November 4, 2016 and November 1, 2017 grant date, $26.40 and $28.29, respectively. RSUs vest equally on the first, second, and third anniversaries of the grant date. See Incentive Plan Awards Restricted Share Units. No share based awards were granted to NEOs during Fiscal 2015. |
(2) |
During fiscal 2017, Bradley S. Shaw, Jay Mehr, Vito Culmone, and Trevor English were granted options to acquire 60,000, 50,000, 40,000, and 30,000 Class B Non-Voting Shares, respectively. Amounts reported in 2017 represent the September 1, 2016 grant date fair value of stock options calculated using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: expected variability of the Corporations Class B Non-Voting Shares 17.49%, expected dividend yield 4.52%, risk-free interest rate 0.78%, and expected life of the options 7.2 years. The options granted are not immediately exercisable but rather 20% of the original option grant is exercisable on each of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversary dates of September 1, 2016. |
(3) |
During fiscal 2016, Bradley S. Shaw, Mr. Mehr, Mr. Culmone, and Mr. English were granted options to acquire 60,000, 50,000, 40,000, and 30,000 Class B Non-Voting Shares, respectively. Amounts reported in 2016 represent the January 18, 2016 grant date fair value of stock options calculated using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model with the following assumptions: expected variability of the Corporations Class B Non-Voting Shares 17.70%, expected dividend yield 4.95%, risk-free interest rate 0.92%, and expected life of the options 6.7 years. The options granted are not immediately exercisable but rather 20% of the original option grant is exercisable on each of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversary dates of September 1, 2016. Other than as described in note 9 and 11 below, no stock options were granted to the NEOs in 2015. |
(4) |
Amounts reported represent annual cash payment. (See Corporate Performance metrics for a discussion metrics, weightings and payout) |
(5) |
Amounts reported include all compensatory amounts related to the Companys defined contribution and defined benefit plans. The SERP and defined benefit component of the ERP are actuarially determined using the projected benefit method and managements |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
31 |
best estimate of salary escalation and retirement ages of officers. These amounts do not reflect cash figures in the current period. See Pension Plans. JR Shaw, Bradley S. Shaw and Mr. Mehr are SERP members and Mr. Culmone and Mr. English are ERP members. |
(6) |
Amounts reported include employee share purchase plan, transportation, share based dividends and other benefits. If the value of perquisites and benefits does not exceed either $50,000 or 10% of the relevant NEOs total salary, no amount is reported. |
(7) |
Calculated and paid pursuant to the provisions of the agreement between the Company and JR Shaw, as described under the heading Compensation Discussion and Analysis Employment Contracts. Under the terms of the agreement, provided that the Company reaches its annual financial targets, a bonus shall be paid to JR Shaw in an amount between 0.5% and 1.0% of the Companys Income Base (as defined in Compensation Discussion and Analysis Employment Contracts) for the year in which it is to be paid. For fiscal 2015 and 2016, JR Shaw received a bonus of $10,039,293 and $9,600,000, respectively, which represented approximately 0.5% of the Income Base. In fiscal 2017, JR Shaw received a bonus of $9,600,000 which represented approximately 0.54% of the Income Base. |
(8) |
Amounts reported in fiscal 2017 and 2016 for Mr. English include the grant date fair value of the award of PSUs. The fair value is determined based on the average of the closing prices of the Class B Non-Voting Shares on the TSX for the five trading days preceding the November 18, 2016 and November 1, 2017 grant date, $26.01 and $28.29, respectively. PSUs vest on the third anniversary of the grant date provided that the performance criteria set by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee on the grant date are met. See Incentive Plan Awards Performance Share Units. The performance criteria set for the November 18, 2016 and November 1, 2017 PSU grants are three year cumulative targets for: (i) operating income before restructuring costs and amortization, and (ii) consolidated revenue, both of which must be met. In fiscal 2017, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee adjusted the performance criteria for the November 18, 2016 PSU grant to exclude discontinued operations (i.e. Shaw Tracking and ViaWest). |
(9) |
During fiscal 2015, Mr. Culmone was granted options to acquire 100,000 Class B Non-Voting Shares. The $291,000 amount reported represents the June 1, 2015 grant date fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected variability of the Class B Non-Voting Shares 20.96%, expected dividend yield 4.3%, risk-free interest rate 1.29%, and expected life of the options 7.2 years. These options vest as to 20% on each of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. |
(10) |
Vito Culmone joined the Company on June 1, 2015. Vito Culmone received a signing bonus of $500,000 in fiscal 2015. |
(11) |
During fiscal 2015, Mr. English was granted options to acquire 70,000 Class B Non-Voting Shares. The $179,760 amount reported represents the September 1, 2014 grant date fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: expected variability of the Class B Non-Voting Shares 18.44%, expected dividend yield 4.02%, risk-free interest rate 1.43% and expected life of the options 5 years. These options vest as to 20% on each of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth anniversaries of the grant date. |
(12) |
Mr. English received performance/transaction bonuses aggregating to $2,000,000 in recognition of his extraordinary contributions in connection with the successful completion of the divestiture of ViaWest and acquisition of 700 MHz and 2500 MHz wireless spectrum licences spectrum from Quebecor, which both occurred in fiscal 2017. In fiscal 2016, Mr. English also received performance/transaction bonuses aggregating to $3,000,000 in recognition of his extraordinary contributions in connection with the completion of the Companys two transformational transactions, the acquisition of Freedom Mobile and the divestiture of Shaw Media. |
(13) |
JR Shaw, Bradley S. Shaw, and Mr. Mehr voluntarily reduced their base salary by 20% effective March 8, 2016. |
(14) |
JR Shaw and Bradley S. Shaw both served as NEOs and directors of the Company from fiscal 2015 to 2017 and did not receive any compensation for serving as directors. Mr. English does not receive any additional compensation from the Company for sitting on the Corus board. |
32 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
3. |
Option-Based and Share-Based Awards |
The following table sets forth details with respect to stock options, RSUs and PSUs held by the NEOs as of August 31, 2017.
Option Awards | Share Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of
# |
Option
$ |
Option
Expiry Date |
Aggregate
$ |
Number
# |
Market or
Payout Value of Share Based Awards that have not Vested $ |
Market or
Payout Value of Vested Share Based Awards Not Paid Out or Distributed $ |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bradley S. Shaw |
50,000 | 20.82 | 01-Jul-2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
300,000 | 19.54 | 30-Jun-2019 | $3,179,800 | 47,441 | (3) | $1,321,706 | (4) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
60,000 | 23.96 | 31-Aug-2025 | 49,193 | (2) | $1,391,500 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
60,000 | 26.23 | 31-Aug-2026 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Jay Mehr |
200,000 | 19.54 | 30-Jun-2019 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
President |
50,000 | 23.96 | 31-Aug-2025 | $1,940,500 | 28,033 | (3) | $780,999 | (4) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
50,000 | 26.23 | 31-Aug-2026 | 29,069 | (2) | $822,250 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vito Culmone |
100,000 | 27.45 | 01-Jun-2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and |
40,000 | 23.96 | 31-Aug-2025 | $262,200 | 17,236 | (3) | $480,195 | (4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
40,000 | 26.23 | 31-Aug-2026 | 15,908 | (2) | $450,000 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trevor English |
10,000 | 20.82 | 01-Jul-2018 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Executive Vice President and |
60,000 | 19.54 | 30-Jun-2019 | $729,400 | 13,740 | (3) | $382,796 | (4) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Strategy and Business |
70,000 | 27.39 | 31-Aug-2024 | 13,433 | (2) | $380,000 | (5) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Development Officer |
20,000 | 23.96 | 31-Aug-2025 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
30,000 | 26.23 | 31-Aug-2026 |
Notes:
(1) |
Based on the difference between the market value of $27.86, which is the closing price for the Class B Non-Voting Shares on TSX on August 31, 2017, and the exercise price of the options (both vested and unvested). |
(2) |
The number of PSUs and RSUs granted is determined by dividing the grant date fair value by the five-day average closing price of $28.29 per Class B Non-Voting Share on the TSX for the November 1, 2017 grant date. |
(3) |
The number of PSUs and RSUs granted is determined by dividing the grant date fair value by the five day average closing price of $26.04 and $26.01 per Class B Non-Voting Share on the TSX for the November 4 and 18, 2016 grant dates, respectively. |
(4) |
The market value is based on the closing price per Class B Non-Voting Share on the TSX on August 31, 2017. |
(5) |
The market value is the grant date fair value of the award of PSUs and RSUs. The fair value is determined based on the average of the closing price per Class B Non-Voting Share on the TSX for the five trading days preceding the November 1, 2017 grant date. |
During fiscal 2017, the following NEOs exercised options:
Number of Options Exercised |
Realized Benefit $ |
|||||||
Bradley S. Shaw |
400,000 | 1,332,680 | ||||||
Jay Mehr |
108,000 | 451,893 | ||||||
Trevor English |
80,000 | 248,000 |
Incentive Plan Awards Value Vested or Earned During the Year
The following table sets forth details on the vesting and payouts of awards under the Companys incentive plans for the NEOs during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2017.
Option-
$ |
Share-
$ |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan
$ |
||||||||||
JR Shaw, Executive Chair |
| | 9,600,000 | |||||||||
Bradley S. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer |
27,240 | | 5,566,000 | |||||||||
Jay Mehr, President |
22,700 | | 3,289,000 | |||||||||
Vito Culmone, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
48,960 | | 1,800,000 | |||||||||
Trevor English, Executive Vice President & Chief Strategy and Business Development Officer | (7,160 | ) | | 800,000 |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
33 |
Notes:
(1) |
Amounts reported represent the aggregate dollar value that would have been realized if all options that vested during fiscal 2017 were exercised on the vesting date. The value is calculated as the difference between the market value on the vesting date and the exercise price of the options. The market value was $26.23 per Class B Non-Voting Share on September 1, 2016 and $28.99 per Class B Non-Voting Share on June 1, 2017. |
(2) |
Amounts reported represent actual annual cash payment. |
4. |
Pension Plans |
During fiscal 2017, the Company maintained defined contribution pension plans and a defined benefit pension plan, as described below, in which the NEOs participate.
Company Defined Contribution Plan (CDCP)
The Company has a defined contribution pension plan which is available to all eligible employees. Under this plan, the Company makes annual contributions up to a maximum of 5% of each employees annual salary (or a maximum of 10% for certain senior leaders including the NEOs). Funds are accumulated under the employees name and used on retirement to purchase one of several types of annuities at the option of the employee. As a defined contribution plan, this pension plan of the Company is fully funded and is not subject to surpluses or deficiencies.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)
Effective September 1, 2002, the Company established a SERP for its most senior executive officers. The SERP is a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan. The SERP was closed to new members in June 2012. The SERP has three active and 12 retired members.
Benefits under the SERP are based on the senior executive officers length of service and his or her SERP pensionable earnings. SERP pensionable earnings is defined as the sum of the:
(1) |
average of the three highest base salary years; and |
(2) |
average of the three years where the sum of the cash short-term incentive plan payout, RSU and PSU grant values was the highest; |
during his or her years of service with the Company.
For fiscal years 2012 and later, the base salary for purposes of determining SERP pensionable earnings was fixed at the senior executive officers fiscal 2012 base salary. The SERP provides for payments equal to 5% of SERP pensionable earnings for each of the first ten years of SERP membership and 1.5% for each year of SERP membership thereafter. The maximum annual pension that a senior executive officer may earn under the SERP is 70% of SERP pensionable earnings. The SERP pension will be subject to an adjustment for early retirement for senior executive officers retiring prior to (i) age 60 and five years of SERP eligible service, or (ii) age 55 and 10 years of SERP eligible service.
A senior executive officer of the Company must be in a SERP-eligible position for five years to qualify to receive a pension. Senior executive officers who retire at age 60 or later will receive a full pension as will those senior executive officers who retire after age 55 with ten years of SERP-eligible service. Senior executive officers between the ages of 55 and 60 with less than ten years of SERP-eligible service and senior executive officers between the ages of 50 and 55 with 15 years of SERP-eligible service are eligible to retire with a discounted pension.
Executive Retirement Plan (ERP)
Effective January 1, 2013, the Company established the ERP for senior executive officers who are not members of the SERP. The ERP is a non-contributory pension plan with a defined benefit component and a defined contribution component, designed to be market competitive and provide long-term financial security to senior executive officers.
34 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
Benefits under the defined benefit component of the ERP are based on the officers length of service in the plan and his or her highest three-year average rate of ERP eligible earnings (base salary plus annual cash short-term incentive plan payout plus PSU and RSU grant values) during his or her ten final years of credited service in the ERP. The ERP provides for payments equal to 1% of ERP eligible earnings for each year of credited service in the ERP. Officers who retire at age 62 or later will receive a full pension. Officers between the ages of 55 and 62 are eligible to retire with a discounted pension.
For the defined contribution component of the ERP, the Company makes annual contributions of 10% of each members ERP eligible earnings (base salary plus annual cash short-term incentive plan payout plus RSU and PSU grant values). The defined contribution component of the ERP is fully funded and is not subject to surpluses or deficiencies.
An executive officer of the Company must be employed at Shaw for one year to qualify to receive a pension.
Pension Plan Tables
The following table presents the benefits accumulated under the CDCP and the defined contribution component of the ERP for the NEOs. The actual benefits payable upon retirement will be determined by the size of each participants account values (based on the amount of actual contribution and realized investment returns) and any interest earned to the time benefits commence.
Name (1) |
Pension
Plan |
Accumulated Value
$ |
Compensatory (2) $ |
Non-
Compensatory
(3)
|
Accumulated
$ |
|||||||||||||
Bradley S. Shaw, Chief Executive Officer |
CDCP |
737,702 | 26,230 | 41,474 | 805,406 | |||||||||||||
Jay Mehr, President |
CDCP |
476,508 | 26,230 | 26,605 | 529,343 | |||||||||||||
Vito Culmone, Executive Vice President & |
CDCP |
55,067 | 26,230 | 3,400 | 84,697 | |||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
ERP |
326,328 | 323,770 | 62,327 | 712,425 | |||||||||||||
Trevor English, Executive Vice President & Chief |
CDCP |
329,629 | 26,230 | 18,637 | 374,496 | |||||||||||||
Strategy and Business Development Officer |
ERP |
591,960 | 381,770 | 50,345 | 1,024,075 |
Notes:
(1) |
No accumulated funds remain in the CDCP for JR Shaw as he was required to move funds from the plan by age 71. |
(2) |
Includes contributions paid by the Company. |
(3) |
Includes regular investment income credited to the accounts during the financial year. |
The following table presents the credited number of years of service at August 31, 2017 and the estimated annual retirement benefits payable to NEOs under the SERP and the defined benefit component of the ERP for the NEOs for service up to August 31, 2017 and at normal retirement (age 65 SERP, age 62 ERP). In addition, the total accrued pension obligation for each NEO is shown along with the changes to the obligation during the financial year ended August 31, 2017.
Name |
Pension
Plan |
Number of
Years of Credited Service (1)(6) # |
Annual Benefits Payable (1)(2) |
Accrued
$ |
Compensatory
$ |
Non-
$ |
Accrued
$ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
At Year End
$ |
At Retirement $ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JR Shaw |
SERP |
52 | 8,361,000 | 8,361,000 | 67,613,000 | | (1,845,000 | ) | 65,768,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Bradley S. Shaw |
SERP |
22 | 4,903,000 | 6,620,000 | 107,572,000 | 2,449,000 | (18,460,000 | ) | 91,561,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Jay Mehr |
SERP |
7 | 1,161,000 | 3,597,000 | 28,612,000 | 4,488,000 | (6,705,000 | ) | 26,395,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Vito Culmone |
ERP |
2 | 85,000 | 506,000 | 765,000 | 612,000 | (10,000 | ) | 1,367,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Trevor English |
ERP | 5 | 141,000 | 1,093,000 | 1,181,000 | 322,000 | (155,000 | ) | 1,348,000 |
Notes:
(1) |
Rounded to nearest whole year as of August 31, 2017. |
(2) |
If the NEO exceeds age 65 the current age is used. |
(3) |
Amounts represent the actuarial value of projected benefits for service to the date indicated. The calculation uses actuarial assumptions and methods which are consistent with those used for calculating pension obligations disclosed in the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
(4) |
Amounts represent the projected pension benefit for service in the year plus the change in accrued obligation due to differences between actual and assumed compensation for the year. |
(5) |
Amounts represent the impact of interest on the net obligation, changes in the interest assumption, and any other experience gains and losses. |
(6) |
Number of Years of Credited Service is the number of years from the date a NEO entered into the SERP or ERP Plan which may differ from a NEOs actual years of service at the Company. |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
35 |
The Companys obligations and related costs of the SERP benefits and the defined benefit component of the ERP are actuarially determined using the projected benefit method, pro-rated on service, and managements best estimate of salary escalation and retirement ages of officers.
The accrued benefit obligation of the SERP at August 31, 2017 was $518 million and the fair value of the Plan assets was $419 million.
In the event of a change of control of, or merger involving, the Company, the SERP and ERP become fully vested and fully funded immediately.
Further information with respect to the SERP and the defined benefit component of the ERP, and the Companys accounting policy with respect thereto, is set forth in Notes 2 and 26 to the audited annual consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended August 31, 2017.
5. |
Compensation of Directors |
Directors of the Company are currently remunerated for their services as directors according to the fee schedule set forth in the table below.
Type of Fee |
Amount $ |
Total Fees Paid to Directors During Fiscal 2017 $ |
||||||
Annual Board Member Retainer Fee (1) |
$ | 65,000 | $ | 1,957,084 | ||||
Annual Lead Director Retainer Fee |
$ | 75,000 | $ | 75,000 | ||||
Annual Committee Member Retainer Fee |
$ | 6,000 | $ | 81,886 | ||||
Annual Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair Retainer Fee (2) |
$ | 15,000 | $ | 13,333 | ||||
Annual Human Resources and Compensation Committee Chair Retainer Fee (2) |
$ | 15,000 | $ | 15,000 | ||||
Annual Audit Committee Chair Retainer Fee (2) |
$ | 40,000 | $ | 40,000 | ||||
Board and Committee Attendance Fee (per meeting) |
$ | 1,500 | $ | 244,500 | ||||
Total |
$ | 2,426,803 |
Notes:
(1) |
Each independent director also receives a grant of DSUs each year. For fiscal 2017 the grant was 3,765 DSUs valued at $105,075 which is included in the total fee amount of $1,957,084. The fair value is determined based on the closing price at which the Class B Non-Voting Shares were traded on the TSX on the grant date. |
(2) |
The annual Committee Chair Retainer Fees include the $6,000 annual retainer fee paid to the Committee Chair as a member of the committee. In January, the annual Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair Retainer Fee increased to $15,000. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair Retainer Fee of $13,333 reported for fiscal 2017 is a prorated amount. |
The fees paid to directors of the Company are payable in Canadian dollars for directors resident in Canada and in U.S. dollars for all other directors. The Company also reimburses directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings.
During fiscal 2017, the Companys director compensation was benchmarked against a comparator group by Willis Towers Watson. In order to maintain director compensation at or above the market median, the Company will continue to benchmark against a comparator group and adjust fees using a mix of cash and DSUs.
36 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
Director Compensation Table
The following table sets out the compensation paid to each of the Companys directors for the financial year ended August 31, 2017. Fees earned are paid in cash or paid in DSUs as elected by each director. See also DDSU Plan. Directors who are also employees of the Company or its subsidiaries receive no remuneration as directors.
Name (5)(6) |
Fees
Paid in Cash $ (2) |
Fees Earned - Paid in DSU (1) $ |
Share-
Awards $ (3) |
All Other
Compensation
|
Total $ |
|||||||||||||||
Adrian I. Burns |
96,500 | | 105,075 | 65,640 | 267,215 | |||||||||||||||
George F. Galbraith |
34,957 | | | (7) | 28,700 | 63,657 | ||||||||||||||
Richard R. Green |
16,869 | 102,829 | 105,075 | 67,623 | 292,396 | |||||||||||||||
Lynda Haverstock |
93,500 | | 105,075 | 47,429 | 246,005 | |||||||||||||||
Gregg Keating |
| 93,500 | 105,075 | 67,063 | 265,638 | |||||||||||||||
Michael W. OBrien |
130,500 | | 105,075 | 71,066 | 306,642 | |||||||||||||||
Paul K. Pew |
| 178,833 | 105,075 | 102,432 | 386,340 | |||||||||||||||
Jeffrey C. Royer |
| 89,000 | 105,075 | 98,160 | 292,236 | |||||||||||||||
JC Sparkman |
123,709 | | 105,075 | 61,056 | 289,840 | |||||||||||||||
Carl E. Vogel |
58,890 | 58,890 | 105,075 | 33,928 | 256,784 | |||||||||||||||
Sheila C. Weatherill |
| 90,500 | 105,075 | 57,657 | 253,232 | |||||||||||||||
Willard H. Yuill |
102,500 | | 105,075 | 36,877 | 244,452 |
Notes:
(1) |
DSUs are credited to a directors DSU account based on dividing the cash value of the compensation by the average of the high and low prices of the Class B Non-Voting Shares on the compensation dates. |
(2) |
Cash Amounts paid to Richard R. Green, JC Sparkman and Carl E. Vogel, residents of the U.S., are payable in U.S. dollars and have been translated into Canadian dollars at the applicable monthly average exchange rates. |
(3) |
Amounts represent the grant date fair value of the award of 3,765 DSUs to each director. The fair value is determined based on the closing price at which the Class B Non-Voting Shares were traded on the TSX on the grant date. |
(4) |
Includes the dollar value of notional dividends paid or payable in DSUs. |
(5) |
Compensation Disclosure for JR Shaw and Bradley S. Shaw who were both NEOs and directors in fiscal 2017, can be found in the Summary Compensation Table. In fiscal 2017, JR Shaw and Bradley S. Shaw did not receive compensation for serving as directors of the Company. |
(6) |
In fiscal 2017, Peter Bissonnette and Jim Shaw did not receive any compensation for serving as directors of the Company. |
(7) |
George F. Galbraith was a director until January 2017 and did not receive the annual DSU grant. |
Outstanding Option-Based Awards
The following table sets forth details with respect to stock options held by the directors of the Company, other than those that are NEOs, as of August 31, 2017.
Name (2) |
Number of Securities
Unexercised Options # |
Option Exercise Price $ |
Option Expiry Date |
Aggregate Value of Unexercised In- the-Money Options (1) $ |
||||||||||||
Adrian I. Burns |
50,000 | 26.20 | 30-Oct-2017 | 83,000 | ||||||||||||
Richard R. Green |
30,000 | 19.17 | 02-Jul-2020 | 260,700 | ||||||||||||
Gregg Keating |
50,000 | 26.20 | 30-Oct-2017 | 83,000 | ||||||||||||
Jeffrey C. Royer |
50,000 | 26.20 | 30-Oct-2017 | 83,000 | ||||||||||||
JC Sparkman |
50,000 | 26.20 | 30-Oct-2017 | 83,000 | ||||||||||||
Sheila C. Weatherill |
70,000 | 21.31 | 20-Jan-2019 | 458,500 | ||||||||||||
Willard H. Yuill |
50,000 | 26.20 | 30-Oct-2017 | 83,000 |
Notes:
(1) |
Based on the difference between the market value of $27.86 per Class B Non-Voting Common Share on August 31, 2017 and the exercise price of the options. |
(2) |
Disclosure for JR Shaw and Brad Shaw who are both NEOs and directors in fiscal 2017, can be found in Incentive Plan Awards the Summary Compensation Table |
Incentive Plan Awards Value Vested or Earned During the Year
No incentive plan awards to any of the Directors value vested or were earned during fiscal 2017.
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
37 |
DDSU Plan
The Company has a Directors Deferred Share Unit Plan (DDSU Plan) under which directors may elect to receive 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of their annual cash compensation in the form of deferred share units (DSUs), provided that any director who has not met the applicable share ownership guideline is generally required to elect to receive at least 25% of his or her annual compensation in DSUs. The number of DSUs to be credited to a directors account equals such amount of compensation allocated to the DDSU Plan divided by the then current market value of a Class B Non-Voting Share. On each dividend payment date for the Class B Non-Voting Shares, a number of additional DSUs is credited to the directors DSU account equal to, for each DSU, the amount of the per Class B Non-Voting Share dividend divided by the then current market value of a Class B Non-Voting Share. When the director ceases to be a director, the DSUs will be payable by a cash payment equal to the current market value of a Class B Non-Voting Share for each DSU at the time of payout.
Share Ownership Guideline
The Board supports ownership of the Companys shares by its directors and has established a related share ownership guideline. The guideline level of ownership by each director is such number of Class A Shares, Class B Non-Voting Shares and DSUs having an aggregate market value of at least $250,000. As previously stated, any director who has not met the share ownership guideline is generally required to elect to receive at least 25% of his or her annual compensation in DSUs. Each of the nominee directors meets the share ownership guidelines, with the exception of Mike Sievert who has just been nominated to stand for election to the Board at the January 11, 2018 annual general meeting.
The directors nominated for election at the Meetings as a group own or control a 12.2% economic interest in all of the Companys outstanding share capital, divided as follows: 11.2% by the Shaw family, as controlling shareholders, and 1.1% by those nominee directors who are not members of the Shaw family. For these non-controlling nominee directors, this represents an average ownership position in excess of 13 million 6 . The median value of equity (common shares and DSUs) held by these non-controlling nominee directors is approximately 2.8 million 7 .
For information concerning the shares, DSUs and options held by each director nominated for election at the Meeting, see the tables under Business of the Meeting Election of Directors.
6 |
The average ownership position is calculated using of $29.99 per Class A Share and $28.30 per Class B Non-Voting Share, being the closing prices on November 27, 2017. |
7 |
The median value of equity (common shares and DSUs) held by the non-controlling nominee directors is calculated using of $29.99 per Class A Share and $28.30 per Class B Non-Voting Share, being the closing prices on November 27, 2017. |
38 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Board and management of the Company recognize that effective corporate governance is central to the prudent direction and operation of the Company in a manner that ultimately enhances shareholder value. The following discussion outlines the Companys approach toward corporate governance policies and practices.
The Companys corporate governance practices and policies have been developed under the stewardship of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board in response to evolving laws and best practices, including the policies of the Canadian Securities Administrators, the TSX and the NYSE as well as the Sarbanes Oxley Act.
1. |
Board & Committee Membership and Independence |
As of the date hereof, the Board is comprised of 15 directors, which will increase to 16 if all of the proposed nominees are elected at the January 11, 2018 Annual General Meeting. The Board members and their committee membership are identified in the table below.
The Board defines a director to be independent if he or she has no direct or indirect material relationship with the Company, as determined by the Board in consultation with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. A material relationship is a relationship which, in the Boards view, could reasonably be expected to interfere with the exercise of a directors independent judgment. Based on a review of the applicable factual circumstances, including financial, contractual and other relationships, the Board, in consultation with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, has determined that 11 Board members, being 73% of the current Board (and 12 Board members, being 75% of the proposed nominees), are independent as outlined in the table below.
Director (6)(7)(8) |
Audit Committee |
Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee |
Human
Resources &
|
Executive
Committee |
Independence Analysis | |||||
Peter J. Bissonnette |
Not Independent (1) | |||||||||
Adrian I. Burns |
X | X | Independent | |||||||
Richard R. Green |
X | Independent | ||||||||
Lynda Haverstock |
X | Independent | ||||||||
Gregg Keating |
X | Independent | ||||||||
Michael W. OBrien |
Chair | X | Independent | |||||||
Paul K. Pew |
Chair | X | Independent | |||||||
Jeffery C. Royer |
X | Independent | ||||||||
Bradley S. Shaw |
X | Not Independent (2)(5) | ||||||||
Jim Shaw |
Not Independent (3)(5) | |||||||||
JR Shaw |
Chair | Not Independent (4)(5) | ||||||||
JC Sparkman |
X | X | Independent | |||||||
Carl E. Vogel |
X | Independent | ||||||||
Sheila C. Weatherill |
X | Independent | ||||||||
Willard H. Yuill |
Chair | Independent |
Notes:
(1) |
Executive Officer of the Company in the last three years. Peter J. Bissonnette served as the President of the Company until August 31, 2015. |
(2) |
Bradley S. Shaw is the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. |
(3) |
Jim Shaw is the Vice Chair and former Chief Executive Officer of the Company. |
(4) |
JR Shaw is the founder and Executive Chair of the Company. |
(5) |
JR Shaw is the father of brothers, Jim Shaw and Bradley S. Shaw. JR Shaw, Jim Shaw and Bradley S. Shaw are deemed to be, or are related to, the Companys controlling shareholder through the Shaw Family Living Trust and its trustee as described under the heading Voting Procedures Voting Shares and Principal Holders Thereof. |
(6) |
George F. Galbraith, who is independent, did not stand for re-election at the January 12, 2017 Annual General Meeting. |
(7) |
Mike Sievert, who is independent, will stand for election at the January 11, 2018 Annual General Meeting. |
(8) |
Further details about each nominee for election to the Board at the Meeting is provided under the heading Business of the Meeting Election of Directors. |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
39 |
The Company does not have a mandatory retirement policy or term limit policy for members of the Board and rather assesses board renewal as part of its annual board and committee assessments. The Company considers it important to retain directors who hold significant investments in the Company on its board of directors, particularly those with significant and unique business experience in the industry. A significant financial stake strongly motivates independent thinking and analysis and brings a long-term perspective which is beneficial to the Company and all of its shareholders. The Company believes that it is a preferred practice to retain the benefit of director insight from related industry, regulatory or technological experience. This is particularly significant for the Company given the narrow field of candidates who have experience in this unique, regulated sector in Canada. The Company considers that a director term limit in the context of a controlled corporation where a controlling shareholder would be required to step down as a director after serving for a stipulated period of time is inappropriate. The relationship between the Company and its controlling shareholder is unique and a valuable element of the Companys leadership, culture and governance.
2. |
Board of Directors |
The Board has established a written Board mandate which is reviewed on a regular basis and updated as considered appropriate by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board. A copy of the Board mandate is included as Exhibit A to this proxy circular.
Duties
The Board has responsibility for supervising and overseeing management of the business and affairs of the Company. The Boards duties include to:
|
appoint senior management; |
|
review performance of, and approve compensation of, senior management; |
|
monitor plans for succession, training and development; |
|
satisfy itself as to the integrity of senior management and ensure that senior management maintains a culture of integrity throughout the Company; |
|
approve the Companys strategic objectives, business plans and budgets as discussed below; |
|
approve significant strategic transactions, including significant acquisitions, dispositions and financings; |
|
identify and assess the principal risks inherent in the business activities of the Company and ensure that management takes reasonable steps to implement appropriate systems to manage such risks; |
|
ensure that the operational and financial performance of the Company, as well as any developments that may have a significant and material impact on the Company, are adequately reported to shareholders, regulators and stakeholders on a timely and regular basis; and |
|
develop, implement and oversee a disclosure policy to enable the Company to communicate effectively with its shareholders and other stakeholders. |
Certain responsibilities and powers of the Board have been delegated to committees of the Board as outlined below.
Strategic Planning
With respect to strategic planning, the Board establishes strategic objectives for the Company, reviews and approves managements strategic plans and budgets, and reviews emerging trends, opportunities, risks and issues with management. The Board reviews adjustments to managements budgets, plans and objectives as may be required during the year.
The Board receives regular updates from management on strategic developments (generally eight times per year) and presentations are given at regularly scheduled meetings or at dedicated strategic planning meetings where topics that are strategic to the Companys performance and prospects are explored in depth. In fiscal 2017, strategic sessions of the Board were undertaken in separate meetings in October and April. See Statement of Corporate Governance Orientation & Continuing Education.
40 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
Executive Chair
JR Shaw is the Boards Executive Chair. As such, he has overall responsibility for the stewardship of the Company.
The Executive Chair fulfills the role of chair of the Board, which position is described in the Companys Board mandate. Responsibilities of the Executive Chair include to:
|
facilitate effective operation and management of, and provide leadership to, the Board; |
|
act as chair of meetings of the Board; |
|
assist in setting the agenda for each meeting of the Board and otherwise bring forward for consideration matters within the mandate of the Board; |
|
facilitate the Boards interaction with management; |
|
act as a resource and mentor and provide leadership for other members of the Board; and |
|
perform such other duties and responsibilities as may be delegated to the Executive Chair by the Board. |
Lead Director
Paul K. Pew, an independent director, was appointed in January 2015 as the Companys third Lead Director since creating the position in 2004. The Lead Directors role is to provide leadership to the Companys independent directors, serve as an independent leadership contact for the directors and maintain and enhance the quality of the Companys corporate governance practices. As such the Lead Director also serves as Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. A Lead Director serves for a term of five to seven years.
The terms of reference for the Lead Director are set out in the Companys Board mandate and include to:
|
in conjunction with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board, provide leadership to ensure that the Board functions independently of management; |
|
in the absence of the Executive Chair and the Vice Chair, act as chair of meetings of the Board and chair all in camera meetings of the independent directors; |
|
recommend, where necessary, the holding of special meetings of the Board; |
|
review with the Executive Chair and Chief Executive Officer items of importance for consideration by the Board; |
|
as may be required from time to time, consult and meet with any or all of the independent directors and represent independent directors in discussions with management on corporate governance issues and other matters; |
|
serve as Board ombudsman, so as to ensure that questions or comments of individual directors are heard and addressed; |
|
with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, ensure that the Board, committees of the Board, individual directors and senior management understand and discharge their duties and obligations under the Companys system of corporate governance; |
|
mentor and counsel new members of the Board to assist them in becoming active and effective directors; |
|
with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, facilitate the process of conducting director evaluations; |
|
with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, promote best practices and high standards of corporate governance; and |
|
perform such other duties and responsibilities as may be delegated to the Lead Director by the Board. |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
41 |
Attendance Record
The Board attendance record for fiscal 2017 is outlined below.
Director |
Audit
Committee |
Corporate
Governance & Nominating Committee |
Human
Resources & Compensation Committee |
Committees
(1)
(Total) |
Board | Overall Attendance | ||||||||||||||||||
Peter J. Bissonnette |
8/9 | 8/9 (89%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Adrian I. Burns |
4/4 | 4/4 | 9/9 | 13/13 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
George F. Galbraith (2) |
2/2 | 2/2 | 4/4 | 6/6 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Richard R. Green |
4/4 | 4/4 | 9/9 | 13/13 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Lynda Haverstock |
6/6 | 6/6 | 9/9 | 15/15 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gregg Keating |
6/6 | 6/6 | 9/9 | 15/15 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Michael W. OBrien |
4/4 | 4/4 | 9/9 | 13/13 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Paul K. Pew |
4/4 | 4/4 | 9/9 | 13/13 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Jeffrey C. Royer |
4/4 | 4/4 | 8/9 | 12/13 (92%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bradley S. Shaw |
9/9 | 9/9 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Jim Shaw |
9/9 | 9/9 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
JR Shaw |
9/9 | 9/9 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
JC Sparkman |
4/6 | 4/6 | 7/9 | 11/15 (73%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Carl E. Vogel |
4/4 | 4/4 | 8/9 | (3) | 12/13 (92%) | |||||||||||||||||||
Sheila C. Weatherill |
4/4 | 4/4 | 9/9 | 13/13 (100%) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Willard H. Yuill |
6/6 | 6/6 | 9/9 | 15/15 (100%) |
Note:
(1) |
No Executive Committee meetings were required in fiscal 2017. |
(2) |
George F. Galbraith was a director until January 2017 and did not stand for re-election at the January 12, 2017 Annual General Meeting. |
(3) |
Carl Vogel recused himself from one of the meetings on account of a possible conflict with a transaction. |
In Camera Sessions
The Board mandate provides that the Board shall hold, in conjunction with each Board meeting, in camera sessions at which non-independent directors and members of management are not in attendance. At each in camera session the independent directors meet with the Executive Chair and the Chief Executive Officer without any other member of management, subsequently with the Executive Chair alone and finally without any member of management or the Executive Chair. The Lead Director chairs the independent directors in camera sessions.
The committees of the Board met in camera in fiscal 2017 as follows:
Audit Committee |
4 times | |||
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee |
4 times | |||
Human Resources and Compensation Committee |
6 times |
Interlocking Directorships
The interlocking directorships are listed below. The Board is of the view that neither of these interlocking directorships affects the independence of the respective members of the Board.
Issuer | Director | Position with Issuer | ||
Liberty Global, Inc. |
Richard R. Green | director and member the nominating and corporate governance committee | ||
JC Sparkman | director and chair of the compensation committee and member of nominating and corporate governance and succession planning committees | |||
Universal Electronics Inc. |
JC Sparkman | director and chair of the compensation committee and member of the corporate governance and nominating committee | ||
Carl E. Vogel | director and member of the audit committee |
The Board addresses interlocking directorships on a case-by-case basis. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the effect of interlocking directorships on director independence when considering nominees as new directors. Existing directors are subject to the Companys Outside Directorship Guidelines.
42 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
Committees of the Board
Subject to applicable law, the Board delegates certain of its powers, duties and responsibilities to committees of the Board. The Board has established four standing committees as discussed below.
3. |
Audit Committee |
The Audit Committee is comprised of Michael W. OBrien (Chair), Richard R. Green, and Jeffrey C. Royer 8 . Each member of the Audit Committee is an independent director and is considered to be financially literate. Each of Michael W. OBrien and Jeffrey C. Royer also qualify as a financial expert under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other applicable regulatory requirements.
A copy of the Audit Committee charter is included in the Companys Annual Information Form and is available on the Companys website which was updated in fiscal 2016.
Duties
The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing the integrity of the Companys financial reporting process. In this regard, the Audit Committee duties include oversight of:
|
the integrity of the Companys financial statements and related information; |
|
managements processes for assessing and reporting on the effectiveness of internal controls; |
|
the external and internal auditors (including review of the audit plan with the external auditors and the Companys senior management) and evaluation of the qualification, effectiveness and independence of the external and internal auditors; |
|
the Companys compliance with legal and regulatory requirements relating to public disclosure and financial reporting; and |
|
the Companys processes for identifying, assessing and managing risks and the Companys financing strategy. |
With respect to internal controls over financial reporting, the Company has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its system of internal controls over financial reporting and concluded that the Companys system of internal controls over financial reporting was effective as of August 31, 2017 and that the Company is in compliance with the requirements of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Internal Audit and Advisory Services
The Audit Committee is also responsible for overseeing the work of the Companys Internal Audit and Advisory Services department whose mandate is to provide independent and objective audit and advisory services in order to evaluate and improve the effectiveness of the Companys governance, internal controls, disclosure processes and risk management activities. In that regard, the Audit Committee oversees the work of the Internal Audit and Advisory Services department and all reports issued by the Internal Audit and Advisory Services department.
Risks
The Audit Committee reviews:
|
managements processes for identifying, assessing and managing the principal risks to the Company and its businesses; |
8 |
The Audit Committee also included George F. Galbraith, who was considered financially literate, until January 12, 2017. Mr. Galbraith was a director until January 12, 2017 and did not stand for re-election at the January 12, 2017 Annual General Meeting. |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
43 |
|
the major risk exposures and trends identified by the Companys management and its implementation of risk policies and procedures to monitor and manage such exposure; and |
|
the Companys risk disclosure in its annual and interim materials. |
As part of this process, the Audit Committee regularly reviews reports and discusses significant financial statement or audit risks with the Companys external auditors. The Audit Committee undertakes a further review of the significant corporate level risks through the Enterprise Risk Management program (ERM). The ERM is a performance focused process designed to identify and manage significant corporate level risks that could impact the achievement of our strategic objectives. The Companys executives meet quarterly to: (1) review and update significant corporate level risks; (2) assess such corporate level risks in terms of likelihood and magnitude of impact, (3) review the response strategy, and (4) monitor progress. The Companys executives provided an ERM report to the Board in April, 2017, with updates to be provided at least annually . The significant risks and uncertainties affecting the Company and its business are discussed in the Companys 2017 Annual Report under Introduction to the Business Known Events, Trends, Risks and Uncertainties in Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Whistleblower and Fraud
As part of its oversight of the integrity of the Companys internal controls, the Audit Committee specifically reviews and addresses fraud prevention and other procedures. Under the Companys Business Conduct Standards, the Company has implemented procedures to ensure that concerns and complaints with respect to accounting, auditing, internal control and public disclosure matters, among others, are brought to the attention of the Chair of the Audit Committee.
Chair
The mandate of the Audit Committee outlines the chairs responsibilities, which include: organizing the committees affairs, chairing its meetings, providing guidance to the members, retaining outside experts as required and reporting to the Board on the Audit Committees work.
4. |
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee |
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is comprised of Paul K. Pew (Chair), Adrian I. Burns, Carl E. Vogel and Sheila C. Weatherill. Each member of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is an independent director.
A copy of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee charter is available on the Companys website at www.shaw.ca .
Duties
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for developing and monitoring the Companys approach to corporate governance in accordance with good corporate practice, applicable laws and policies. In particular, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for overseeing the role, composition, structure and effectiveness of the Board and its committees. In this regard, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees duties include to:
|
establish and review the mandates of the Board and its committees; |
|
identify and evaluate candidates for nomination to the Board; |
|
oversee the orientation and education programs for directors; |
|
assess the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and individual directors; |
|
establish, review and assess compliance with general corporate policies and practices, such as the business conduct standards, the related party transaction policies, communications policies, and securities trading guidelines; and |
44 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
|
manage the orderly succession of directors to maintain an appropriate complement of experience and skills on the Board. |
Nomination of Directors
In consultation with the Executive Chair, Chief Executive Officer and the Lead Director, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies potential candidates for the Board, reviews their qualifications and makes recommendations on candidates to the Board. In particular, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee assesses, among other factors, industry experience, functional expertise, financial literacy and expertise, board experience and background having regard for the Companys strategic direction, opportunities and risks. To assist with the director nomination process, the Company has adopted a number of tools and strategies including: a director skills matrix; engaging external consultants; and developing model director profile(s).
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believes that the Board should be comprised of directors with a broad range of experiences and expertise. In consultation with the Executive Chair and Chief Executive Officer, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee uses a skills matrix to identify director skills, competencies and conducts a gap analysis to identify areas that can be improved for the Board to carry out its mandate effectively. The results from the skills matrix analysis are used to identify the skills, competencies, and personal attributes for model director profile(s) created by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, with the support of external consultants, the Executive Chair and the Chief Executive Officer. Model director profile(s) assist the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee to identify and target potential director candidates possessing the skills, competencies and personal attributes from which the Board could benefit.
In consultation with the Executive Chair and Chief Executive Officer, and with the support of external consultants, the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee identifies potential director candidates possessing the required skills, competences, and personal attributes. The potential director candidates undergo a rigorous interview process with external consultants, the Executive Chair, Chief Executive Officer, the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and other Board members. Any selection discussions are made with input and recommendation from the Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, Executive Chair, and Chief Executive Officer. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee then makes a formal recommendation to the Board where it is decided by resolution to approve the new director.
Board Diversity
Diversity enhances culture and creates value for employees, customers, shareholders and other stakeholders. The Company believes that increasing Board diversity to reflect its customers and the communities they live in is crucial. To that end, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee takes into account factors such as gender and cultural diversity, with a view to ensuring that the Board benefits from a broader range of perspectives and relevant experience. Diversity considerations form an integral part of the Companys skills matrix analysis (discussed above) and in addition to merit, diversity is an essential factor in the selection process for new directors, including representation of women and minorities.
At this time, the Board has not adopted a formal diversity policy or targets for director positions. The Company believes that it can achieve appropriate gender and cultural diversity through its director nomination and selection process without the imposition of a formal policy or diversity targets. As a long-standing diverse employer that promotes and supports a culture of inclusion, it fully appreciates the benefits of leveraging a diverse range of skills and perspectives. In particular, the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers the level of representation of women on the Board by overseeing the selection process and ensuring that sufficient women and other diverse candidates are included in the pool of potential candidates for consideration.
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
45 |
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee believes the 16 nominees for election to the Board reflect an appropriate diversity of gender, culture, experience and expertise to service the best interests of the Company and its stakeholders. The director nominees for the January 11, 2018 Annual General Meeting include three females, representing 3 out of 12 (25%) of the independent director nominees and 3 out of 16 (19%) of all director nominees.
Orientation and Continuing Education
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for the orientation of new directors and ongoing education initiatives for all members of the Board. The orientation includes an overview of the Companys history and operations, a review of industry conditions and competition and an introduction to the Companys management team.
All directors have regular access to senior management to discuss Board presentations and matters of interest as the senior management team is invited to attend board meetings and engage in active discussion with board members on topics presented. Most of the directors also sit on other boards which enables them to bring that experience to the functions of the Companys board.
The Board members are expected to be informed about issues affecting the Companys business, governance and other related issues. In this regard, the Company undertakes ongoing education initiatives at the Board level. Director education requirements are overseen by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. In recognition of the rapidly changing technology and competitive environment, the Board receives regular updates from management on strategic developments (generally eight times per year) and presentations are given at regularly scheduled meetings or at dedicated strategic planning meetings. Presentation topics are proposed by management or requested by Board members. The presentations are made by internal and external experts on a wide range of topics relevant to the current and future direction of the Company. Topics covered in fiscal 2017 included: the competitive landscape in our business divisions, including Consumer, Business Network Services, and Business Infrastructure Services; the presentation of the updated strategic plan; spectrum requirements for the wireless business and to enhance the Companys converged network strategy; the disposition of the Business Infrastructure Services division and ensuring the Company maintains holdings of assets consistent with and complimentary to its growth profile; network optimization and convergence; and the evolving regulatory environment and the Companys approach to regulatory changes and other corporate initiatives. Site visits to the Companys facilities are arranged periodically. The Company also has a director education policy by which funding can be made available for attendance by directors at external programs. A list of meetings in fiscal 2017 where educational and strategic topics were covered is set out in the table below.
Educational and Strategic Topics | Attendees | Timing | ||
Senior management presentation on performance and emerging issues | Full Board | Quarterly | ||
Corporate governance updates on new requirements and emerging issues and practices |
Corporate Governance and
Nominating Committee |
Quarterly | ||
Changes in generally accepted accounting principles | Audit Committee | Quarterly | ||
Compensation trends and benchmarking |
Human Resources and
Compensation Committee |
Quarterly | ||
Strategic Planning meetings: | Full Board |
April 2017
October 2016 |
||
Topics covered included: |
||||
competitive landscape in our business divisions; |
||||
the presentation of the updated strategic plan; |
||||
spectrum requirements for the wireless business and to enhance the Companys converged network strategy; |
||||
the disposition of the Business Infrastructure Services division and ensuring the Company maintains holdings of assets consistent with and complimentary to its growth profile; |
||||
network optimization and convergence; and |
||||
the evolving regulatory environment and the Companys approach to regulatory changes and other corporate initiatives. |
46 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
Board and Committee Assessments
The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the effectiveness of the Board, its committees and individual directors. As part of this assessment of the effectiveness of the board, board renewal is considered. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee conducts an annual survey of each of the directors by a confidential questionnaire that addresses the effectiveness of the operation of the Board and the committee(s) of which the director is a member, board culture and director self-evaluation. The survey results are compiled by an outside consultant and strengths and areas which might be strengthened are summarized. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews recommendations arising out of the evaluations and makes recommendations as it considers appropriate. The results of the survey are shared with the Board.
Review of Charters
Each of the Audit Committee and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee annually review their committee charters and recommend any changes to the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee considers these recommendations and annually reviews the charters for each of the Board committees and the mandate of the Board and recommends any changes to the Board for consideration and approval.
Chair
The mandate of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee outlines the chairs responsibilities, which include: organizing the committees affairs, chairing its meetings, providing guidance to the members, retaining outside experts as required and reporting to the Board on the committees work.
5. |
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is comprised of Willard H. Yuill (Chair), Lynda Haverstock, Gregg Keating and JC Sparkman. Each member of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee is an independent director.
A copy of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee charter is available on the Companys website www.shaw.ca .
Duties
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is responsible for overseeing the Companys significant human resource strategies and periodically reviewing the Companys compensation philosophy and material strategies and policies and the effectiveness thereof. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee also approves the appointment of senior management recruited from outside the Company, as well as the promotion of senior management within the Company. In this regard, the Human Resources and Compensation Committees duties include to:
|
review and approve responsibilities, performance criteria and incentive compensation targets and assess performance for senior executives; |
|
assess the long-term and short-term incentive plans to ensure that they do not incent risk-taking beyond the Companys risk tolerance; |
|
review and approve employee benefits plans, equity-based plans and retirement plans; |
|
review the succession planning and talent management program and ensure that appropriate programs are in place to manage succession, recruitment and retention of senior management; |
|
review and approve the terms of engagement of compensation consultants; |
|
review and monitor occupational health and safety programs; and |
|
review programs to address employment equity, employee engagement and employee relations. |
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
47 |
Compensation of Management
In respect of management, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee is responsible for ensuring that appropriate and effective human resource recruitment, development, compensation, retention, succession planning (including appointing, training and monitoring senior management) and performance evaluations programs are developed and implemented in conformity with the Companys strategic objectives and with a view to attracting and retaining the best qualified management and employees. The committee annually reviews, approves and reports to the Board on the compensation of the senior executives of the Company, and recommends for approval by the Board compensation for the NEOs. The performance of the Company and its individual executive officers during the fiscal year is taken into consideration when the Committee conducts its annual executive compensation review. The Committee also takes into consideration the compensation of similar positions within the Companys comparator group to ensure that the level of executive compensation is competitive and effective in attracting and retaining outstanding executive talent.
Chief Executive Officer
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee: (1) reviews and approves the responsibilities of the Chief Executive Officer; and (2) monitors the corporate objectives that the Chief Executive Officer is responsible for meeting on an annual basis and regularly reviews whether such objectives are being met in alignment with the Companys objectives and strategic plan.
Succession Planning
At least annually, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee reviews with management its program for succession planning. This program identifies high performers as well as successors for key positions for all roles from director level to the Chief Executive Officer. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee also oversees the Companys talent development and formal leadership programs.
Compensation of the Board
In respect of the Board, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee is charged with the responsibility of reviewing the adequacy and form of the compensation of directors. It considers time commitment, responsibilities and fees paid by the Companys peer group in determining remuneration to ensure the Company continues to retain and attract the best individuals. Directors receive their compensation in the form of cash, DSUs or a combination of cash and DSUs.
Compensation Consultants
From time to time, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee retains independent human resources consultants to provide expert advice and opinions on compensation and other matters. In fiscal 2016 and 2017, the Company retained Willis Towers Watson to provide director and senior executive compensation services. (For fee detail, see Statement of Compensation Engagement of Compensation Consultant.)
Diversity in Executive Officer Positions
Diversity is integral to the Companys continued growth and success. We believe a more diverse workforce leads to stronger financial performance by representing the customers and communities that we serve in Canada. In addition to the value the Company sees in Board diversity (as described under Committees of the Board Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Board Diversity), the Company also recognizes the benefit of diversity throughout all levels of the organization, including at the executive officer level. The Company is actively engaged in promoting diversity to enrich its culture and foster innovation through diversity of thought and perspective, and embedding it into the broader talent management programs in order to deliver and drive business results.
48 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
The Companys diversity program focuses on under-representation of employees that are women, visible minorities, indigenous, or people with disabilities. The Companys current initiatives are: (1) the hiring and retention of talented employees through work placement programs and establishing recruitment partnerships to attract diverse candidates, (2) incorporating diversity awareness through the Companys leadership development, on-boarding and other programs, and (3) enhancing the Companys internal communications to raise diversity awareness and remove unconscious biases. To monitor the programs effectiveness, the Company uses diversity metrics to measure its progress quarterly and strives to ensure the Company is an equitable workplace representative of the customers and communities we serve in Canada.
At this time, Shaw has not adopted a formal diversity policy or targets for the representation of women at the executive officer level. Shaw believes arbitrary targets are a weak substitute for a consistently applied recruitment policy that encourages an inclusive and diverse workplace, which includes considering the representation of women in executive officer positions. When considering potential candidates for executive officer positions, the Company considers both gender and cultural diversity, recognizing the importance of having an executive team representing different skills and perspectives.
Currently women comprise 5 out of 19 (26%) of the Companys senior leadership team (senior vice president level and above). By broadening diversity initiatives across the Company and into the business plans and strategies, the Company strives to be an industry leader in diversity while achieving operational excellence.
Chair
The mandate of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee outlines the chairs responsibilities, which include: organizing the committees affairs, chairing its meetings, providing guidance to the members, retaining outside experts as required and reporting to the Board on the committees work.
6. |
The Executive Committee is comprised of JR Shaw (Chair), Adrian I. Burns, Michael W. OBrien, Paul K. Pew, Bradley S. Shaw and JC Sparkman. Each of Adrian I. Burns, Michael W. OBrien, Paul Pew and JC Sparkman is an independent director.
A copy of the Executive Committee charter is available on the Companys website at www.shaw.ca .
The Executive Committee carries out all matters that may be specifically and lawfully delegated to it by the Board. In particular, the Executive Committee exercises the powers of the Board in circumstances where, following initial approval of a matter by the full Board, the Board delegates approval of certain aspects to the Executive Committee. Matters reviewed and approved by the Executive Committee are in most circumstances referred back to the full Board for ratification, confirmation and approval at the next meeting of the Board.
Chair
The mandate of the Executive Committee outlines the chairs responsibilities, which include: organizing the committees affairs, chairing its meetings, facilitating the Executive Committees interaction with management, the Board and other committees of the Board and providing guidance to the members.
7. |
Business Conduct Standards
The Company has adopted a set of Business Conduct Standards, which apply to all directors, officers and employees of the Company. Business Conduct Standards are available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com and on the Companys website at www.shaw.ca . The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, with the assistance of the Companys Business Conduct Standards Committee (a committee of management
Proxy Circular Shaw Communications Inc. |
49 |
representatives from each of the Consumer, Business Network Services, Wireless, Human Resources and Legal departments which meets regularly throughout the year), is responsible for monitoring compliance with the Business Conduct Standards and for approving waivers of such standards. No such waivers for directors or officers of the Company have been granted as of the date hereof.
The Companys Business Conduct Standards address such matters as conflicts of interest, confidential information, and the protection and proper use of the Companys assets. The Business Conduct Standards also include procedures for the submissions of complaints or concerns that employees may have regarding compliance with corporate policies or applicable laws or with respect to accounting, internal control and auditing matters. All new directors, officers, employees and certain contractors are required to receive an orientation about the Business Conduct Standards when they commence their engagement with the Company.
The Board monitors compliance with the Business Conduct Standards through the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Audit Committee, with the assistance of the Companys Business Conduct Standards Committee. Each such Board committee receives updates on matters relating to the Business Conduct Standards that are relevant to it.
No material change reports have been filed since the beginning of the Companys most recently completed financial year that pertain to any conduct of a director or executive officer that constitutes a departure from the Business Conduct Standards.
Related Party Transaction Policy
Transactions or agreements in respect of which a director or executive officer of the Company has a material interest are subject to the Related Party Transaction Policy. For any such transactions or agreements, the director or officer is required to disclose his or her interest in accordance with the Related Party Transaction Policy, the Business Conduct Standards and the Business Corporations Act (Alberta). When applicable, he or she is required to excuse him or herself from any consideration or vote relating to such transaction or agreement.
At each quarterly meeting, each of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the fairness of any potential transactions in which a director or officer of the Company may be involved or connected, if any.
Communications Policy
The Company has adopted corporate disclosure guidelines with respect to the dissemination of material information in a timely manner to all shareholders in accordance with applicable securities laws. Under such guidelines, the Board, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee, approves annual and quarterly reports to shareholders, as well as other material public communications.
All quarterly and annual financial statements, material press releases, investor presentations and other corporate governance-related materials are posted immediately on the Companys website. With respect to the release of its quarterly financial results, the Company provides Internet and telephone conference call access to interested parties.
Investor enquiries receive a response through the Finance department of the Company or through an appropriate officer of the Company.
50 |
Shaw Communications Inc. Proxy Circular |
SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS MANDATE
This Mandate of the Board of Directors (the Board) of Shaw Communications Inc. (the Corporation) was adopted October 23, 2014.
I. |
Mandate |
The Board has responsibility for supervising and overseeing management of the business and affairs of the Corporation consistent with its powers and obligations under the Business Corporations Act (Alberta) (the ABCA) and under other legal and regulatory requirements applicable to a corporation that is a reporting issuer in Canada and the United States and whose securities are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange and the New York Stock Exchange.
In this regard, the Board shall, in accordance with the Corporations Articles and By-laws:
|
manage the business and affairs of the Corporation; |
|
act honestly and in good faith with a view to the best interests of the Corporation; and |
|
exercise the care, diligence and skill that reasonably prudent people would exercise in comparable circumstances. |
The Board will fulfill its mandate primarily by carrying out the responsibilities and duties set forth in Section IV of this Mandate.
II. |
Composition |
Pursuant to the terms of the Articles of the Corporation, the Board shall consist of a minimum of 8 and a maximum of 20 directors.
The Board shall be comprised of a majority of directors that meet the independence, expertise and other membership requirements under applicable laws and any other applicable policies established by the Board.
The members of the Board shall be elected annually by shareholders of the Corporation or as otherwise provided by the Articles. Each member of the Board shall serve until the next annual general meeting of shareholders of the Corporation or until his or her earlier resignation or removal from the Board.
The Chair of the Board shall be appointed by the Board from among its members and shall carry out the responsibilities and duties set forth in Section VI of this Mandate.
The Board may also appoint, from time to time, an independent Lead Director from among its members to serve for a term of five to seven years. The Lead Director will provide leadership to the independent directors of the Board and carry out the responsibilities and duties set forth in Section VII of this Mandate.
III. |
Meetings |
The Board shall meet at least quarterly and more frequently as circumstances require or as requested by a member of the Board or a senior officer of the Corporation.
Notice of each meeting of the Board shall be given to each member of the Board as far in advance of the time for the meeting as practicable, but in any event, not later than 24 hours preceding the time of the meeting (unless waived by all members of the Board). Each notice of meeting shall state the nature of the business to be transacted at the meeting in reasonable detail and to the extent practicable, be accompanied by copies of documentation to be considered at the meeting.
A-1
A quorum for the transaction of business at a meeting shall consist of not less than a majority of the members of the Board. Members of the Board may participate in any meeting by means of such telephonic, electronic or other communication facilities as permit all persons participating in the meeting to communicate adequately with each other, and a member participating by any such means shall be deemed to be present at that meeting.
Senior management of the Corporation and other parties may attend meetings of the Board, as may be deemed appropriate by the Board. The Board shall schedule in camera independent director sessions to be held in conjunction with each Board meeting. The independent directors may also meet in camera at other appropriate times. The Lead Director shall chair in camera independent director sessions.
Minutes shall be kept of all meetings of the Board (other than in camera sessions) and shall be signed by the Chair and Secretary of the meeting.
IV. |
Responsibilities and Duties of the Board |
To fulfill its mandate, the Board shall be charged with the specific responsibilities and duties set out in this Section IV. To the extent permissible under applicable law and the Corporations Articles and By-laws, the Board may delegate such responsibilities and duties to committees of the Board constituted in accordance with Section V of this Mandate.
While the ABCA and Corporations By-laws provide that the Board shall manage the business and affairs of the Corporation, the Board operates by delegating certain of its authorities to management of the Corporation and by reserving certain powers to itself.
In this regard, the Board expects management of the Corporation, including the Chief Executive Officer (the CEO) and other senior executives of the Corporation, to provide day-to-day leadership and management of the Corporation and to achieve the overall objectives and policies established by the Board. In particular, the CEO is expected to lead the Corporation and to formulate corporate strategies and policies that are presented to the Board for approval. The Board approves the strategies of the Corporation and the objectives and policies within which it is managed, and then evaluates the performance of the CEO and management. Reciprocally, the CEO and management shall keep the Board fully informed, in a timely and candid manner, of the progress of the Corporation towards the achievement of the goals, objectives or policies established by the Board. Once the Board has approved the strategies and policies, it shall act in a unified and cohesive manner in supporting and guiding the CEO and senior management of the Corporation.
The Boards principal responsibilities and duties fall into the general categories described below.
1. |
Selection and Oversight of Management |
The Board has the responsibility to:
|
select and appoint the CEO and senior management of the Corporation; |
|
review the performance of the CEO and senior management; |
|
approve the compensation of the CEO and senior management; |
|
ensure that plans have been made for management succession, training and development; |
|
provide advice and counsel to the CEO and senior management in the execution of their duties; and |
|
satisfy itself as to the integrity of the CEO and senior management, and |
|
ensure that such officers create a culture of integrity throughout the Corporation. |
2. |
Strategic Planning |
The Board has the responsibility to:
|
review and approve the Corporations long-term strategic objectives and monitor the Corporations progress in reaching such strategic objectives; |
A-2
|
review and approve the business plans, consolidated budgets and other similar plans of the Corporation on an annual basis and monitor the implementation of such plans; |
|
review and approve significant strategic transactions that are not considered to be in the ordinary course of business as well as other items of significance, including significant acquisitions, dispositions and financings; and |
|
identify and review other matters of significance that require approval or input of the Board. |
3. |
Monitoring and Acting |
The Board has the responsibility to:
|
identify and assess the principal risks inherent in the business activities of the Corporation and ensure that management takes all reasonable steps to implement appropriate systems to manage such risks; |
|
ensure that management implements and maintains effective internal controls over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures and management information systems; |
|
develop, review and monitor the Corporations approach to corporate governance, including developing the Corporations corporate governance guidelines and measures for receiving shareholder feedback; and |
|
adopt and monitor compliance with, a code of business conduct applicable to directors, officers and employees of the Corporation. |
4. |
Reporting |
The Board has the responsibility to:
|
ensure that the operational and financial performance of the Corporation, as well as any developments that may have a significant and material impact on the Corporation, are adequately reported to shareholders, regulators and stakeholders on a timely and regular basis; |
|
ensure that the financial performance of the Corporation is reported fairly and in accordance with the Corporations disclosed accounting principles and applicable laws and regulations; and |
|
develop, implement and oversee a disclosure policy to enable the Corporation to communicate effectively with its shareholders and other stakeholders. |
5. |
Legal Requirements |
The Board is responsible for ensuring overall compliance with legal and regulatory requirements applicable to the Corporation.
The Board also has the responsibility for considering, as a full Board, the following matters that in law may not be delegated to management of the Corporation or to a committee of the Board:
|
any submission to shareholders of the Corporation of a question or matter requiring their approval; |
|
filling of a vacancy among the directors or in the office of auditors of the Corporation; |
|
issuance of securities; |
|
declaration of dividends; |
|
purchase, redemption or any other form of acquisition of shares issued by the Corporation; |
|
payment of a commission to any person in consideration of such person purchasing or agreeing to purchase shares of the Corporation from the Corporation or from any other person, or procuring or agreeing to procure purchasers for any such shares; |
|
approval of management proxy circulars; |
|
approval of any take-over bid circular or directors circular; |
|
approval of annual financial statements, management discussion and analysis and annual information forms; and |
|
adoption, amendment or repeal of the By-laws. |
A-3
6. |
Board Functioning |
The Board has the responsibility to:
|
manage its own affairs, including developing its own agendas and procedures; |
|
consider, on an annual basis, the composition and size of the Board and its impact, if any, on the Boards effectiveness; |
|
identify and approve prospective nominees to the Board; |
|
ensure that there is a comprehensive orientation session for directors, as well as other continuing education opportunities; |
|
regularly assess the effectiveness and contribution of the Board, its committees and each individual director; |
|
determine the compensation of directors; and |
|
otherwise establish and review its own policies and practices from time to time. |
V. |
Committees of the Board |
The Board may establish committees of the Board and delegate its duties and responsibilities to such committees, where legally permissible. The Board shall appoint the members to any such committee and shall oversee their performance.
In accordance with applicable laws, policies and guidelines of securities regulatory authorities, the Board shall appoint the following standing committees, each comprised of at least a majority of independent directors:
|
Audit Committee; |
|
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee; and |
|
Human Resources and Compensation Committee. |
In addition, the Board has appointed an Executive Committee. The Executive Committee will have not fewer than a majority of independent directors.
VI. |
Terms of Reference for the Chair |
To fulfill his or her responsibilities and duties, the Chair of the Board shall:
|
facilitate the effective operation and management of, and provide leadership to, the Board; |
|
act as chair of meetings of the Board; |
|
assist in setting the agenda for each meeting of the Board and in otherwise bringing forward for consideration matters within the mandate of the Board; |
|
facilitate the Boards interaction with management of the Corporation; |
|
act as a resource and mentor and provide leadership for other members of the Board; and |
|
perform such other duties and responsibilities as may be delegated to the Chair by the Board from time to time. |
VII. |
Terms of Reference for Lead Director |
The Lead Director will facilitate the functioning of the Board independently of the Corporations management and will also maintain and enhance the quality of Shaws corporate governance practices.
The Lead Director will:
|
in conjunction with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of the Board, provide leadership to ensure that the Board functions independently of management of the Corporation; |
|
act as chair of in camera independent director sessions and , in the absence of the Executive Chair and the Vice Chair, act as chair of meetings of the Board; |
A-4
|
recommend, where necessary, the holding of special meetings of the Board; |
|
review with the Executive Chair and Chief Executive Officer items of importance for consideration by Board; |
|
as may be required from time to time, consult and meet with any or all of Shaws independent directors at the discretion of either party and with or without the attendance of the Executive Chair, and represent such directors in discussions with management of the Corporation on corporate governance issues and other matters; |
|
serve as Board ombudsman, so as to ensure that questions or comments of individual directors are heard and addressed; |
|
with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, ensure that the Board, committees of the Board, individual directors and senior management of the Corporation understand and discharge their duties and obligations under the Corporations system of corporate governance; |
|
mentor and counsel new members of the Board to assist them in becoming active and effective directors; |
|
with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, facilitate the process of conducting director evaluations; |
|
with the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, promote best practices and high standards of corporate governance; and |
|
perform such other duties and responsibilities as may be delegated to the Lead Director by the Board from time to time. |
VIII. |
Terms of Reference for Individual Directors |
As a member of the Board, each director will act honestly, in good faith and in the best interests of the Corporation. Each director will exercise the care, diligence and skill of a reasonably prudent person and will fulfill all legal and fiduciary obligations of a director.
1. |
General |
Each director is expected to:
|
act and speak honestly and with integrity; |
|
demonstrate high ethical standards; |
|
support principled and ethical business practices and a culture of integrity; |
|
maintain a solid understanding of the role, responsibilities and duties of a director; |
|
understand conflict of interest issues and declare real or perceived conflicts; |
|
be an effective ambassador and representative of the Corporation; and |
|
comply with applicable laws, the Corporations Articles, By-laws, business conduct standards and other policies. |
2. |
Skills and Experience |
Each director shall:
|
demonstrate skills and experience that are complementary to other directors of the Board and that are valuable in light of the Corporations business and strategic direction; |
|
develop and maintain a strong understanding of the Corporations business, operations, products, financial position, industry and markets; |
|
apply his or her knowledge, experience and expertise to issues confronting the Corporation; |
|
participate in on-going training and continuing education as may be required or desirable; and |
|
serve as a helpful resource to the Board and to management, where necessary or appropriate. |
A-5
3. |
Preparation, Attendance and Availability |
Each director shall:
|
maintain an excellent attendance record for meetings of both the Board and committees of the Board; |
|
prepare for meetings of the Board and committees of the Board, by reading reports and background materials and by otherwise preparing in a manner that will assist the director in evaluating and adding value to meeting agenda items; |
|
be available and accessible to other members of the Board and to management of the Corporation, as needed; and |
|
have the necessary time and commitment to fulfill all responsibilities as a member of the Board and committees of the Board. |
4. |
Communication and Interaction |
Each director shall:
|
participate fully and frankly in Board deliberations and discussions and contribute meaningfully and knowledgeably to Board discussions; |
|
work effectively with, and be collegial and respectful towards, fellow directors and management of the Corporation; |
|
encourage free and open discussion by the Board with respect to the business and affairs of the Corporation; |
|
communicate with the Chair and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, as appropriate, including when planning to introduce significant or new information or material at a meeting of the Board; |
|
act and speak independently and exercise independent judgment; and |
|
respect confidentiality. |
5. |
Committee Work |
Each director is expected to:
|
participate as a member of a committee of the Board, when requested; and |
|
become knowledgeable about the purpose and objectives of any committee of the Board on which the director serves. |
IX. |
Resources |
The Board shall have the authority to retain legal, accounting and other outside consultants and advisors to advise it. The Board shall also implement a system whereby individual directors may engage an outside advisor, at the expense of the Corporation, to provide consultation and advice in appropriate circumstances.
A-6
Exhibit 2
|
|
SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC.
CLASS A PARTICIPATING SHARES PROXY
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY MANAGEMENT OF SHAW COMMUNICATIONS INC. (THE CORPORATION) FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING (THE MEETING) OF SHAREHOLDERS OF THE CORPORATION TO BE HELD ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 11, 2018 AT 11:00 A.M. (MOUNTAIN TIME) AND AT ANY ADJOURNMENT OR ADJOURNMENTS THEREOF.
I/We, being holder(s) of Class A Participating Shares of Shaw Communications Inc. (the Company), hereby appoint: JR SHAW of Calgary, Alberta, or failing him, BRADLEY S. SHAW of Calgary, Alberta OR
Print the name of the person you are appointing if this person is someone other than the individuals listed above
as the nominee of the undersigned to attend and act for the undersigned at the Meeting, in the same manner, to the same extent and with the same power as if the undersigned were present at the meeting or at any adjournment or adjournments thereof, including the right to appoint a substitute proxyholder, and without limiting the general authorization and powers hereby given, the undersigned shareholder specifies and directs the persons above named that the shares registered in the name of the undersigned shall be voted as indicated below.
VOTING RECOMMENDATIONS ARE INDICATED BY HIGHLIGHTED TEXT OVER THE BOXES
1. |
Election of Directors |
FOR | WITHHOLD | |||
01. Peter J. Bissonnette |
|
|
||
02. Adrian I. Burns |
|
|
||
03. Richard R. Green |
|
|
||
04. Lynda Haverstock |
|
|
||
05. Gregg Keating |
|
|
||
06. Michael W. OBrien |
|
|
||
07. Paul K. Pew |
|
|
||
08. Jeffrey C. Royer |
|
|
FOR
|
WITHHOLD
|
|||
09. Bradley S. Shaw |
|
|
||
10. Jim Shaw |
|
|
||
11. JR Shaw |
|
|
||
12. Mike Sievert |
|
|
||
13. JC Sparkman |
|
|
||
14. Carl E. Vogel |
|
|
||
15. Sheila C. Weatherill |
|
|
||
16. Willard H. Yuill |
|
|
||
FOR | WITHHOLD | |||
2. Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as auditors for the ensuing year and authorize the directors to set their remuneration. |
|
|
Unless otherwise indicated above, this proxy is to be voted in favour of each of the resolutions in respect of the election of directors and the appointment of the auditors, all as referred to above. If any amendments or variations to matters identified in the notice of meeting are proposed at the Meeting or if any other matters properly come before the Meeting, discretionary authority is hereby conferred with respect thereto. The undersigned hereby revokes any proxies previously given with respect to the Meeting.
|
|
|||
Signature(s) |
Date |
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear on this proxy. Please see reverse for instructions. All proxies must be received by 11:00 a.m. (Mountain Time) January 9, 2018, or if the Meeting is adjourned or postponed, not less than 48 hours prior to such adjournment or postponement (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays).
|
|
Proxy Form Annual General Meeting of Shaw Communications Inc. to be held on January 11, 2018 (the Meeting)
Notes:
1. |
This form of proxy is for use of holders of Class A Participating Shares of the Corporation only. |
2. |
This proxy is solicited on behalf of the management of the Corporation and the costs thereof will be borne by the Corporation. |
3. |
A shareholder has the right to appoint a proxyholder (who need not be a shareholder) other than the persons designated above to attend and act for the shareholder at the Meeting. To exercise this right, the shareholder may insert the name of the desired person in the blank space provided above and strike out the other names or may submit another appropriate proxy. |
4. |
This proxy should be signed in the exact manner as the name(s) appear on the proxy. If the shares are registered in the name of more than one owner (for example, joint owners, trustees, executors), then all registered owners should sign this form. If the shares are registered in the name of a corporation or other form of legal entity, this form must be signed by the authorized attorney or officer. If a proxy is signed by a person acting as an authorized attorney or officer or in some other representative capacity, documentation evidencing qualification and authority to act may be required. |
5. |
If this form of proxy is not dated, it will be deemed to bear the date on which it is mailed to the shareholder. |
6. |
If this proxy is duly deposited with AST Trust Company (Canada), the shares represented will be voted or withheld from voting as directed by the shareholder, but if no direction is made, this proxy will be voted in favour of the above matters. If the shareholder specifies in this proxy with respect to any matters to be acted upon, such shares shall, in the event of a poll on such matters, be voted in accordance with the specifications so made. This proxy confers discretion on the proxyholder with respect to amendments to matters identified in the notice of the Meeting and other matters that may properly come before the meeting. |
7. |
This proxy should be read in conjunction with the accompanying documentation. |
HOW TO VOTE
INTERNET | TELEPHONE | |
● Go to www.astvotemyproxy.com ● Cast your vote online ● View Meeting documents |
Use any touch-tone phone, call toll-free in Canada and United States and follow the voice instructions: 1-888-489-5760 | |
To vote by Internet or telephone you will need your control number. If you vote by Internet or telephone, do not return this proxy.
To vote using your smartphone, please scan this QR Code
Complete and return your signed proxy in the envelope provided to:
AST Trust Company (Canada)
P.O. Box 721
Agincourt, ON M1S 0A1
FAX
Fax your proxy to 416-368-2502 or toll-free in Canada and United States to 1-866-781-3111.
Scan and email to proxyvote@astfinancial.com.
Please visit https://ca.astfinancial.com/edelivery and enrol to receive all future investor documents electronically.
All proxies must be received by 11:00 a.m. (Mountain time) on January 9, 2018, or if the Meeting is adjourned or postponed, not less than 48 hours prior to such adjournment or postponement (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays).