UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): September 28, 2018
TENNECO INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Delaware | 1-12387 | 76-0515284 | ||
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) |
(Commission File Number) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
500 NORTH FIELD DRIVE, LAKE FOREST, ILLINOIS |
60045 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (847) 482-5000
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
☐ |
Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
☐ |
Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
☐ |
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
☐ |
Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an emerging growth company as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933 (§230.405 of this chapter) or Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (§240.12b-2 of this chapter).
Emerging growth company ☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Explanatory Note
On April 10, 2018, Tenneco Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), announced that it entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, Federal-Mogul LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (Federal-Mogul), American Entertainment Properties Corp., a Delaware corporation, and Icahn Enterprises L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, regarding the proposed acquisition of Federal-Mogul by the Company (the Transaction). The purpose of this Current Report on Form 8-K (this Current Report) is (i) to retrospectively recast certain financial information and related disclosures included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 (the 2017 Form 10-K), which was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 28, 2018, as further described below and (ii) to file certain financial statements of Federal-Mogul, and certain pro forma financial statements, each of which is required to be incorporated by reference into registration statements filed by the Company. The information in this Current Report is not an amendment to, or restatement of, the 2017 Form 10-K.
ITEM 8.01 Other Events
As disclosed in the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2018, filed on May 10, 2018, the Company changed its reportable segments effective as of the first quarter of 2018. The new reportable segments consist of the Clean Air, Ride Performance and Aftermarket businesses. The new reportable segments, which are also the Companys operating segments, align with how the Chief Operating Decision Maker allocates resources and assesses performance against the Companys key growth strategies.
To reflect (i) the change in segments described in the foregoing paragraph and (ii) the Companys retrospective adoption of (A) Accounting Standard Update (ASU) 2017-07, CompensationRetirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, (B) ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash FlowClassification of certain cash receipts and cash payments (Topic 230) and (C) ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash FlowsRestricted Cash (Topic 230), the following Items of the 2017 Form 10-K have been recast retrospectively (which Items as adjusted are attached as Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, 99.3 and 99.4 to this Current Report and incorporated by reference herein):
|
Part I, Item 1. Business |
|
Part II, Item 6. Selected Financial Data |
|
Part II, Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
The disclosures filed as Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, 99.3 and 99.4 replace the corresponding portions of the 2017 Form 10-K. This Current Report does not reflect events that may have occurred subsequent to the original filing date of the 2017 Form 10-K, and does not amend, restate, modify or update in any way the disclosures made in the 2017 Form 10-K other than as required to retrospectively reflect the change in segment reporting and the adoption of the ASUs as described above. All other information in the 2017 Form 10-K remains unchanged. Without limitation of the foregoing, this filing does not purport to update Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for any information, uncertainties, risks, events or trends occurring or known to management subsequent to the date of filing of the 2017 Form 10-K. Unaffected items and unaffected portions of the 2017 Form 10-K have not been repeated in, and are not amended or modified by, this Current Report or Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, 99.3 or 99.4. The information in this Current Report should be read in conjunction with the 2017 Form 10-K. For information on developments since the filing of the 2017 Form 10-K, please refer to the Companys subsequent filings with the SEC.
Federal-Moguls consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, consolidated statements of operations and statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and the notes thereto are attached as Exhibit 99.5 and incorporated by reference herein.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2018 and unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of income of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017 and the notes thereto, which are attached as Exhibit 99.6 hereto, replace the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements of the Company set forth in Exhibit 99.3 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 26, 2018.
ITEM 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
(a) Financial statements of businesses acquired.
(1) Federal-Moguls consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, consolidated statements of operations and statements of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and consolidated statements of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and the notes thereto are attached as Exhibit 99.5 and incorporated by reference herein.
(b) Pro forma financial information.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2018 and unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of income of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017 and the notes thereto are filed as Exhibit 99.6 hereto and incorporated by reference herein.
(d) Exhibits
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
TENNECO INC. | ||||
Date: September 28, 2018 | By: |
/s/ Brandon B. Smith |
||
Brandon B. Smith | ||||
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary |
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-17485, 333-41535, 333-33934, 333-101973, 333-113705, 333-142475, 333-159358 and 333-192928) and the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-224786) of Tenneco Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2018, except for the change in composition of reportable segments discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements and the changes in the manner in which the Company accounts for certain components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs, cash received to settle the deferred purchase price of factored receivables and restricted cash discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is September 28, 2018, relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedule and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Current Report on Form 8-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
September 28, 2018
Exhibit 99.1
ITEM 1. |
BUSINESS. |
TENNECO INC.
The following discussion should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Exhibit 99.4 attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K. All references to notes to our consolidated financial statements refer to the financial statements included in Exhibit 99.4 attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The following discussion has been updated subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 to reflect a change in reportable segments and the adoption of certain new accounting standards in the first quarter of 2018.
General
Our company, Tenneco Inc., designs, manufactures and distributes highly engineered products for both original equipment vehicle manufacturers (OEMs) and the repair and replacement markets, or aftermarket, worldwide. We are one of the worlds largest producers of clean air and ride performance products and systems for light vehicle, commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle applications. As used herein, the term Tenneco, we, us, our, or the Company refers to Tenneco Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1996. In 2005, we changed our name from Tenneco Automotive Inc. to Tenneco Inc. The name Tenneco better represents the expanding number of markets we serve through our commercial truck and off-highway businesses. Building a stronger presence in these markets complements our core businesses of supplying ride performance and clean air products and systems to original equipment and aftermarket customers worldwide. Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol TEN.
Our Internet address is http://www.tenneco.com . We make our proxy statements, annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, as filed with or furnished to the SEC, available free of charge on our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after submission to the SEC. Securities ownership reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 are also available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after submission to the SEC. The contents of our website are not, however, a part of this report. All such statements and reports can also be found at the internet site maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov .
Our Audit Committee, Compensation/Nominating/Governance Committee and Executive Compensation Subcommittee Charters, Corporate Governance Principles, Stock Ownership Guidelines, Audit Committee policy regarding accounting complaints, Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Managers, Code of Conduct, Policy and Procedures for Transactions with Related Persons, Equity Award Policy, Clawback Policy, Insider Trading Policy, policy for communicating with the Board of Directors, and Audit Committee policy regarding the pre-approval of audit, non-audit, tax and other services are available free of charge on our website at www.tenneco.com. In addition, we will make a copy of any of these documents available to any person, without charge, upon written request to Tenneco Inc., 500 North Field Drive, Lake Forest, Illinois 60045, Attn: General Counsel. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K and applicable NYSE rules regarding amendments to, or waivers of, our Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Managers and Code of Conduct by posting this information on our website at www.tenneco.com.
1
CONTRIBUTIONS OF MAJOR BUSINESSES
For information concerning our operating segments, geographic areas and major products or groups of products, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements of Tenneco Inc. included in Item 8. The following tables summarize for each of our reportable segments for the periods indicated: (i) net sales and operating revenues; (ii) earnings before interest expense, income taxes and noncontrolling interests (EBIT); and (iii) expenditures for plant, property and equipment. See also Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 7 for information about certain costs and charges included in our consolidated results; and our three reportable segments (Clean Air, Ride Performance and Aftermarket). Costs related to other business activities, primarily corporate headquarters functions, are disclosed separately from the three operating segments as Other. We evaluate segment performance based primarily on earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and noncontrolling interests. Products are transferred between segments and geographic areas on a basis intended to reflect as nearly as possible the market value of the products.
Net Sales and Operating Revenues:
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollar Amounts in Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 6,281 | 68 | % | $ | 5,872 | 68 | % | $ | 5,493 | 67 | % | ||||||||||||
Ride Performance |
1,867 | 20 | % | 1,640 | 19 | % | 1,589 | 19 | % | |||||||||||||||
Aftermarket |
1,291 | 14 | % | 1,279 | 15 | % | 1,301 | 16 | % | |||||||||||||||
Intersegment sales |
(165 | ) | (2 | )% | (192 | ) | (2 | )% | (202 | ) | (2 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 9,274 | 100 | % | $ | 8,599 | 100 | % | $ | 8,181 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT:
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollar Amounts in Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 421 | 101 | % | $ | 432 | 84 | % | $ | 371 | 73 | % | ||||||||||||
Ride Performance |
61 | 15 | % | 97 | 19 | % | 63 | 12 | % | |||||||||||||||
Aftermarket |
178 | 43 | % | 191 | 37 | % | 174 | 34 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other |
(243 | ) | (59 | )% | (204 | ) | (40 | )% | (100 | ) | (19 | )% | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 417 | 100 | % | $ | 516 | 100 | % | $ | 508 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures for Plant, Property and Equipment:
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollar Amounts in Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 213 | 55 | % | $ | 217 | 63 | % | $ | 207 | 71 | % | ||||||||||||
Ride Performance |
145 | 38 | % | 96 | 28 | % | 66 | 22 | % | |||||||||||||||
Aftermarket |
27 | 7 | % | 26 | 8 | % | 21 | 7 | % | |||||||||||||||
Other |
| | % | 4 | 1 | % | 1 | | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 385 | 100 | % | $ | 343 | 100 | % | $ | 295 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
DESCRIPTION OF OUR BUSINESS
We design, manufacture and sell clean air and ride performance systems and products for light vehicle, commercial truck, off-highway and other applications, and generated revenues of $9.3 billion in 2017. We serve both original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and replacement markets worldwide through leading brands, including Monroe ® , Rancho ® , Clevite ® Elastomers, Axios , Kinetic ® , and Fric-Rot ride performance products and Walker ® , XNOx ® , Fonos , DynoMax ® and Thrush ® clean air products.
As a parts supplier, we produce individual component parts for vehicles as well as groups of components that are combined as modules or systems within vehicles. These parts, modules and systems are sold globally to most leading OEMs, commercial truck and off-highway engine manufacturers, and aftermarket distribution channels.
Overview of Parts Industry for Vehicles and Engines
The parts industry for vehicles and engines is generally separated into two categories: (1) original equipment or OE parts that are sold in large quantities directly for use by manufacturers of light vehicles, commercial trucks and off-highway engines; and (2) aftermarket or replacement parts that are sold in varying quantities to wholesalers, retailers and installers. In the OE category, parts suppliers are generally divided into tiers Tier 1 suppliers that provide their products directly to OEMs, and Tier 2 or Tier 3 suppliers that sell their products principally to other suppliers for combination into those other suppliers own product offerings.
Light vehicles are comprised of: (1) passenger cars and (2) light trucks which include sport-utility vehicles (SUVs), crossover vehicles (CUVs), pick-up trucks, vans and multi-purpose passenger vehicles. Demand for OE light vehicle automotive parts is generally a function of the number of new vehicles produced, which in turn depends on prevailing economic conditions and consumer preferences. Although OE demand is tied to planned vehicle production, parts suppliers also have the opportunity to grow revenues by increasing their product content per vehicle, by further expanding business with existing customers and by serving new customers in existing or new markets. Companies with a global presence and advanced technology, engineering, manufacturing and support capabilities, such as our company, are better positioned to take advantage of these opportunities.
Increasing vehicle emissions regulations are driving opportunities for increasing clean air content on vehicles and engines. Additionally, the increase and expansion in mandated diesel emission control and noise regulations or standards in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Brazil, Russia, India and South Korea have enabled suppliers such as us to serve customers beyond light vehicles. Certain parts suppliers that have traditionally supplied the automotive industry also develop and produce components and integrated systems for commercial truck, off-highway and other applications, such as medium- and heavy-duty trucks, buses, stationary engines, agricultural and construction equipment, locomotive and marine engines and recreational two-wheelers and all-terrain vehicles. We foresee this diversification of content and applications as a source of future growth.
Demand for aftermarket products is driven by general economic conditions, the number of vehicles in operation, the age and distance driven of the vehicle fleet, and the average useful life and quality of vehicle parts. Although more vehicles are on the road than ever before, the aftermarket has experienced longer replacement cycles due to the improved quality and increased average useful life of vehicle parts that has come to pass as a result of technological innovation. Parts suppliers are increasingly being required to deliver innovative aftermarket products to drive increased aftermarket demand. Global economic downturns generally impact aftermarket sales less adversely than OE sales, as customers forego new vehicle purchases and keep their vehicles longer, thereby increasing demand for repair and maintenance parts and services.
4
Industry Trends
As the dynamics of the customers we serve change, so do the roles, responsibilities and relationships of the participants. Key trends that we believe are affecting parts suppliers include:
General Economic Factors and Production Levels
Global light vehicle production has increased at a steady pace over the past three years, increasing 2% in 2015, 5% in 2016 and 2% in 2017. The overall rate of growth in 2017 was primarily driven by the 20% growth in South America and 4% growth in Europe, while partially offset by 4% decline in North America. IHS Markit projects global light vehicle production will grow 2% in 2018. Production of commercial trucks globally and off-highway equipment in regulated regions has recovered strongly in 2017. Global commercial trucks grew 13% in 2017, 3% in 2016 and declined 14% in 2015. Power Systems Research forecast these markets to be flat in 2018.
Electrification / Hybridization of the Light Vehicle Fleet
There is significant attention on electrification of the light vehicle fleet with both full battery electric vehicles and hybrid powertrains. Electrified vehicles are expected to grow from under 5% of the fleet today to around 34% by 2025, according to IHS Markit, with hybrids expected to make up almost 90% of the electrified fleet in 2025. The fast growing hybrid powertrains need to meet the increasingly stringent emissions standards and currently represent a content growth opportunity for Tenneco.
Autonomous Vehicle and Mobility Trends
Our Monroe ® Intelligent Suspension advanced technologies are well-positioned for autonomous driving trends that we expect will require suspensions with high speed rail smoothness. Our in-development active suspension technologies tap into the seeing and sensing capabilities embedded in autonomous features to become predictive and isolate the cabin and its occupants from the road surface. In addition, shared mobility trends and the resulting greater vehicle utilization drive wear and tear on the vehicles, increasing the need for replacement parts.
Aftermarket Opportunities in New Markets
Tenneco has strong aftermarket positions in North America, Europe and South America. We expect there to be aftermarket growth opportunities in areas such as China and India, and are investing to position ourselves as a leading aftermarket supplier in these regions. For example, the China car parc is expected to age and grow significantly over the next decade. By 2025, we expect the China aftermarket will be the largest in the world. We are leveraging our market-leading capabilities from mature markets and investing to develop the right distributor base, drive brand recognition, increase product coverage, build the supply chain and promote our experience as an OE-quality supplier.
Increasing Environmental Standards
OE manufacturers and their parts suppliers are designing and developing products to respond to increasingly stringent environmental requirements, growth in engines using diesel and alternative fuels, and increased demand for better fuel economy. Government regulations require substantial reductions in vehicle tailpipe criteria pollutant emissions and longer warranty periods for a vehicles pollution control equipment. The products that our clean air division provides reduce the tailpipe emissions of criteria pollutants. In addition, regulations have been adopted to regulate greenhouse gas emissions of carbon dioxide. Reducing CO 2 emissions requires improving fuel economy; as a result improved combustion efficiency and reduction of vehicle mass have become priorities. Manufacturers are responding to all of these regulations with new technologies for gasoline- and diesel-fueled vehicles that minimize pollution and improve fuel economy.
5
As a leading supplier of clean air systems with strong technical capabilities, we are well positioned to benefit from the more rigorous environmental standards being adopted around the world. We continue to expand our investment around the world, in regions such as North America, Europe, China, India, and Japan to capitalize on the growing demand for environmentally friendly solutions for light vehicle, commercial truck and off-highway applications driven by environmental regulations in these regions.
To meet stricter air quality regulations, we have developed and sold diesel particulate filters (DPFs) in Europe, for example, for the Audi A4, BMW 1 series passenger cars and Scania trucks and in North America for GM Duramax engine applications, the Ford Super Duty, the Chrysler Ram Heavy Duty, and off-highway applications for Caterpillar and John Deere in North America and Europe, and Kubota in Japan. These particulate filters, coupled with converters, reduce emissions of particulate matter by up to 90 percent. In addition, we have development and production contracts for our selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems with light and commercial vehicle manufacturers. These SCR systems reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides by up to 95 percent. In China, South America, Europe, and Japan, we have development and production contracts for complete turnkey SCR systems that include the urea dosing technology acquired in 2007 and now sold globally under the name XNOx ® . Regulations in the U.S. and European markets, which require reductions in carbon dioxide emissions and improvements in fuel economy, are creating increased demand for our fabricated manifolds, maniverters, integrated turbocharger/manifold modules, electronic exhaust valves, and lightweight components. Lastly, for various off-highway customers, we offer emission aftertreatment systems designed to meet environmental regulations or their equivalent outside of the U.S. Both commercial truck and off-highway customers are embracing the concept of turnkey aftertreatment systems which require aftertreatment electronic control units (ECUs) as well as related control software which we have developed and sold to several customers.
Increasing Technologically Sophisticated Content
As end users and consumers continue to demand vehicles with improved performance, safety and functionality at competitive prices, the components and systems in these vehicles are becoming technologically more advanced and sophisticated. Mechanical functions are being replaced with electronics; and mechanical and electronic devices are being integrated into single systems. More stringent emission and other regulatory standards are increasing the complexity of the systems as well.
To remain competitive as a parts and systems supplier, we invest in engineering, research and development, spending $158 million in 2017, $154 million in 2016, and $146 million in 2015, net of customer reimbursements. Such expenses reimbursed by our customers totaled $164 million in 2017, $137 million in 2016, and $145 million in 2015, including building prototypes and incurring other costs on behalf of our customers. We also fund and sponsor university and other independent research to advance our clean air and ride performance development efforts.
By investing in technology, we have been able to expand our product offerings and penetrate new markets. For example, we developed DPFs which were first sold in Europe and then offered in North America. Since these original innovations, we have developed T.R.U.E-Clean ® systems with our partners, a product used to regenerate DPFs. We have also built prototypes of urea SCR systems for locomotive and marine engines. We expanded our suite of NOx-reduction technologies, developing prototypes of SCR systems using gaseous ammonia, absorbed on a solid salt, as the reductant or a hydrocarbon lean NOx catalyst (HC-LNC for NOx reduction) that relies on hydrocarbons, ethanol, or other reductants instead of urea. We successfully developed and sold fabricated manifolds, previously used only on gasoline engines, into the passenger car diesel segment. We developed our prototype aftertreatment system for large engines, up to 4500 horsepower, used in line haul locomotives. On the ride performance side of our business, we co-developed with Öhlins Racing AB a continuously controlled electronic suspension system offered by OEMs such as Volvo, Audi, Ford, VW, Mercedes Benz and BMW.
Enhanced Vehicle Safety and Handling
To serve the needs of their customers and meet government mandates, OEMs are seeking parts suppliers that invest in new technologies, capabilities and products that advance vehicle safety, such as roll-over protection
6
systems, computerized electronic suspension, and safer, more durable materials. Those suppliers able to offer such innovative products and technologies have a distinct competitive advantage.
Tenneco offers adjustable and adaptive damping as well as semi-active suspension systems designed to improve vehicle stability, handling, safety and control. Our systems are based on various technologies including DRiV digital valve, Continuously Variable Semi-Active (CVSA) damping and Kinetic ® roll control, and Actively Controlled Car (ACOCAR ). In the aftermarket, we supply premium Monroe ® branded brakes that complement our ride performance offerings. In addition, we continue to promote the Safety Triangle of Steering-Stopping-Stability to educate consumers about the detrimental effect of worn shock absorbers on vehicle steering and stopping distances.
Outsourcing and Demand for Systems and Modules
OEMs have steadily outsourced more of the design and manufacturing of vehicle parts and systems to simplify the assembly process, lower costs and reduce development times. Furthermore, they have demanded from their parts suppliers fully integrated, functional modules and systems made possible with the development of advanced electronics in addition to innovative, individual vehicle components and parts that may not readily interface together.
Modules and systems being produced by parts suppliers are described as follows:
|
Modules are groups of component parts arranged in close physical proximity to each other within a vehicle. Modules are often assembled by the supplier and shipped to the OEM for installation in a vehicle as a unit. Integrated shock and spring units, seats, instrument panels, axles and door panels are examples. |
|
Systems are groups of component parts located throughout a vehicle which operate together to provide a specific vehicle functionality. Emission control systems, anti-lock braking systems, safety restraint systems, roll control systems and powertrain systems are examples. |
This shift towards fully integrated modules and systems created the role of the Tier 1 systems integrator, a supplier responsible for executing a broad array of activities, including design, development, engineering, and testing of component parts, modules and systems. As an established Tier 1 supplier, we have produced modules and systems for various vehicle platforms produced worldwide, including supplying ride performance modules for the Chevrolet Silverado, GMC Sierra, Chevrolet Malibu, Chevrolet Impala and Chevrolet Cruze and emission control systems for the Chevrolet Colorado, GMC Canyon, Ford Super Duty, Ford Focus, Chevrolet Silverado, GMC Sierra, Chevrolet Malibu, Opel Astra, and VW Golf. In addition, we continue to design other modules and systems for platforms yet to be introduced to the global marketplace.
Global Reach of OE Customers
Changing market dynamics are driving OEMs and their parts suppliers to expand their global reach:
|
Growing Importance of Growth Markets: Because the North American and Western European automotive regions are mature, OEMs are increasingly focusing on other markets for growth opportunities, such as India and China. As OEMs have penetrated new regions, growth opportunities for suppliers have emerged. |
|
Governmental Tariffs and Local Parts Requirements: Many governments around the world require vehicles sold within their country to contain specified percentages of locally produced parts. Additionally, some governments place high tariffs on imported parts. |
|
Location of Production Closer to End Markets: As OEMs and parts suppliers have shifted production globally to be closer to their end markets, suppliers have expanded their reach, capturing sales in other markets and taking advantage where possible of relatively low labor costs. |
|
Global Rationalization of OE Vehicle Platforms (described below). |
7
Because of these trends, OEMs are increasingly seeking suppliers capable of supporting vehicle platforms on a global basis. They want suppliers like Tenneco with design, production, engineering and logistics capabilities that can be accessed not just in North America and Europe but also in many other regions of the world.
Global Rationalization of OE Vehicle Platforms
OEMs have standardized on global platforms designing basic mechanical structures that are suitable for a number of similar vehicle models and able to accommodate different features for more than one region. This standardization will drive production of light vehicles designed on global platforms to grow. Accordingly, light vehicle platforms whose annual production exceed one million units are expected to grow from 57 percent of global OE production in 2017 to 61 percent in 2022 based on data provided by IHS Automotive.
With such global platforms, OEMs realize significant economies of scale by limiting variations in items such as steering columns, brake systems, transmissions, axles, exhaust systems, support structures and power window and door lock mechanisms. The shift towards standardization can also benefit parts suppliers. They can experience greater economies of scale, lower material costs, and reduced development costs.
Extended Product Life of Automotive Parts
The average useful life of automotive parts, both OE and replacement, has steadily increased in recent years due to technological innovations including longer-lasting materials. As a result, although there are more vehicles on the road than ever before, the global aftermarket has not kept pace with that growth. Accordingly, aftermarket suppliers have focused on reducing costs and providing product differentiation through advanced technology and recognized brand names. With our long history of technological innovation, strong brands and operational effectiveness, we believe we are well positioned to leverage our products and technology.
Changing Aftermarket Distribution Channels and Increased Competition from Lower cost, Private-Label Products
From 2003 to 2017, the number of traditional jobber stores declined in the U.S. Major aftermarket retailers, such as AutoZone and Advance Auto Parts, have continued their work to expand their retail outlets and commercial distribution strategies to sell directly and more effectively to parts installers, which historically had purchased the majority of their needs from local warehouse distributors and jobbers. The size and number of consolidations as well as key customer distribution center footprint expansions have increased in the last few years, including Advance Auto Parts purchase of Carquest (which included WorldPac), AutoZones purchase of Interamerican Motor Company, OReilly Auto Parts purchase of V.I.P., and more recently Bond Auto, to expand their entrance into the Northeast U.S. market, and Icahn Enterprises L.P.s agreement to acquire Pep Boys and AutoPlus. We are well positioned to respond to these trends and feel our strategy and portfolio of customers are in line with the market changes and opportunities. We make and sell high-quality products marketed under premium brands that appeal to aftermarket retailers and the customers they serve. In addition, our breadth of suspension and emissions control products and a reputation for customer service provide benefits to both wholesalers and retailers.
More recently, our aftermarket business is facing increasing competition from lower cost, private-label products and there is growing pressure to expand our entry level product lines so that retailers may offer a greater range of price points to their consumer customers.
Brands
We have two of the most recognized brands in the industry: Monroe ® used for ride control products and Walker ® for exhaust products. We differentiate our products and their value proposition with our brands:
|
Monroe ® , Kinetic ® , Fric-Rot , Gas-Matic ® , Sensa-Trac ® , OESpectrum ® , and Quick-Strut ® for ride performance products, |
8
|
Walker ® , Fonos , XNOx ® , Mega-Flow ® , Quiet-Flow ® , and Tru-Fit ® for clean air products, |
|
DynoMax ® and Thrush ® for performance clean air products, |
|
Rancho ® for suspension products for high performance light trucks, and |
|
Clevite ® Elastomers and Axios for noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) control components. |
Customers
We strive to develop long-standing business relationships with our customers around the world. We work collaboratively with our OE customers in all stages of production, including design, development, component sourcing, quality assurance, manufacturing and delivery. For both OE and aftermarket customers, we provide timely delivery of quality products at competitive prices and deliver customer service. With our diverse product mix and numerous facilities in major markets worldwide, we believe we are well positioned to meet customer needs.
In 2017, we served more than 80 different OEMs and commercial truck and off-highway engine manufacturers worldwide, and our products were included on six of the top 10 passenger car models produced for sale in Europe and nine of the top 10 light truck models produced for sale in North America for 2017.
During 2017, our OE customers included the following manufacturers of light vehicles, commercial trucks and off-highway equipment and engines:
North America |
Europe |
Asia |
||
AM General |
Agco Corp |
Austem |
||
BMW |
AvtoVAZ |
Beijing Automotive |
||
Caterpillar |
BMW |
BMW |
||
CNH Industrial |
Caterpillar |
Brilliance Automobile |
||
Daimler AG |
CNH Industrial (Iveco) |
CAMC |
||
FCA |
Daimler AG |
Changan Automotive |
||
Ford Motor |
Deutz AG |
China National Heavy-Duty Truck Group |
||
General Motors |
Ford Motor |
Daimler AG |
||
Harley-Davidson |
Geely Automobile |
Dongfeng Motor |
||
Honda Motors |
General Motors |
FCA |
||
Hyundai Motor |
John Deere |
First Auto Works |
||
John Deere |
Mazda Motor |
Ford Motor |
||
Navistar International |
McLaren Automotive |
Geely Automobile |
||
Renault/Nissan |
Paccar |
General Motors |
||
Paccar |
PSA Peugeot Citroen |
Great Wall Motor |
||
Toyota Motor |
Renault/Nissan |
Isuzu Motor Company |
||
Volkswagen Group |
Suzuki Motor |
Jiangling Motors |
||
Volvo Global Truck |
Tata Motors |
JND |
||
Toyota Motor |
Kubota |
|||
Volkswagen Group |
Renault/Nissan |
|||
Volvo Global Truck |
SAIC Motor |
|||
Tata Motors |
||||
Toyota Motor |
||||
Weichai Power |
||||
Yuchai Group |
Australia |
South America |
India |
||
General Motors |
CNH Industrial (Iveco) |
Ashok Leyland |
||
Toyota Motor |
Daimler AG |
BMW |
9
FCA |
Daimler AG |
|||
Ford Motor |
Ford Motor |
|||
General Motors |
General Motors |
|||
John Deere |
John Deere |
|||
PSA Peugeot Citroen |
Mahindra & Mahindra |
|||
Randon S.A. |
Renault/Nissan |
|||
Renault/Nissan |
Suzuki Motor |
|||
Toyota Motor |
Tata Motors |
|||
Volkswagen Group |
Toyota Motor |
|||
Volkswagen Group |
The following customers accounted for 10 percent or more of our net sales in any of the last three years.
Customer | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
General Motors Company |
14 | % | 17 | % | 15 | % | ||||||
Ford Motor Company |
13 | % | 13 | % | 14 | % |
During 2017, our aftermarket customers were comprised of full-line and specialty warehouse distributors, retailers, jobbers, installer chains and car dealers. These customers included National Auto Parts Association (NAPA)/Alliance, Advance Auto Parts, OReilly Auto Parts, and AutoZone in North America; Auto Teile Ring, Autodistribution International, Nexus Automotive International, Temot Autoteile GmbH, and Group Auto Union in Europe; and Rede Presidente in South America. We believe our aftermarket revenue mix is balanced, with our top 10 aftermarket customers accounting for 65 percent of our net aftermarket sales and our aftermarket sales representing 14 percent of our total net sales in 2017.
Competition
We operate in highly competitive markets. Customer loyalty is a key element of competition in these markets and is developed through long-standing relationships, customer service, high quality value-added products and timely delivery. Product pricing and services provided are other important competitive factors.
As a supplier of OE and aftermarket parts, we compete with the vehicle manufacturers, some of which are also customers of ours, and numerous independent suppliers. For OE sales, we believe that we rank among the top two suppliers for certain key clean air and ride performance products and systems in many regions of the world. In the aftermarket, we believe that we are a leader in supplying clean air and ride performance products for light vehicles for the key applications we serve throughout the world.
Seasonality
Our OE and aftermarket businesses are somewhat seasonal. OE production is historically higher in the first half of the year compared to the second half. It typically decreases in the third quarter due to OE plant shutdowns for model changeovers and European holidays, and softens further in the fourth quarter due to reduced production during the end-of-year holiday season in North America and Europe generally. Our aftermarket operations, also affected by seasonality, experience relatively higher demand during the spring as vehicle owners prepare for the summer driving season.
While seasonality does impact our business, actual results may vary from the above trends due to global and local economic dynamics as well as industry-specific platform launches and other production-related events. During periods of economic recession, OE sales traditionally decline due to reduced consumer demand for automobiles and other capital goods. Aftermarket sales tend not to be as adversely affected during periods of economic downturn, as consumers forego new vehicle purchases and keep their vehicles longer, thereby increasing demand for repair and maintenance services. By participating in both the OE and aftermarket segments, we generally see a smaller revenue decline during economic downturns than the overall change in OE production.
10
Clean Air Systems
Vehicle emission control products and systems play a critical role in safely conveying noxious exhaust gases away from the passenger compartment and reducing the level of pollutants and engine exhaust noise emitted to acceptable levels. Precise engineering of the exhaust system which extends from the manifold that connects an engines exhaust ports to an exhaust pipe, to the catalytic converter that eliminates pollutants from the exhaust, and to the muffler that modulates noise emissions leads to a pleasantly tuned engine sound, reduced pollutants and optimized engine performance.
We design, manufacture and distribute a variety of products and systems designed to reduce pollution and optimize engine performance, acoustic tuning and weight, including the following:
|
Catalytic converters and diesel oxidation catalysts Devices consisting of a substrate coated with precious metals enclosed in a steel casing used to reduce harmful gaseous emissions such as carbon monoxide; |
|
Diesel Particulate Filters (DPFs) Devices to capture and regenerate particulate matter emitted from diesel engines; |
|
Burner systems Devices which actively combust fuel and air inside the exhaust system to create extra heat for DPF regeneration, or to improve the efficiency of SCR systems; |
|
Lean NOx traps Devices which reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from diesel powertrains using capture and store technology; |
|
Hydrocarbon vaporizers and injectors Devices to add fuel to a diesel exhaust system in order to regenerate particulate filters or Lean NOx traps; |
|
Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) systems Devices which reduce NOx emissions from diesel powertrains using urea mixers and injected reductants such as Verband der Automobil industrie e.V.s AdBlue ® or Diesel Exhaust Fluid (DEF); |
|
SCR-coated diesel particulate filters (SDPF) systems Lightweight and compact devices combining the SCR catalyst and the particulate filter onto the same substrate for reducing NOx and particulate matter emissions; |
|
Urea dosing systems Systems comprised of a urea injector, pump, and control unit, among other parts, that dose liquid urea onto SCR catalysts; |
|
Four-way catalysts Devices that combine a three-way catalyst and a particulate filter onto a single device by having the catalyst coating of a converter directly applied onto a particulate filter; |
|
Alternative NOx reduction technologies Devices which reduce NOx emissions from diesel powertrains, by using, for example, alternative reductants such as diesel fuel, E85 (85% ethanol, 15% gasoline), or solid forms of ammonia; |
|
Mufflers and resonators Devices to provide noise elimination and acoustic tuning; |
|
Fabricated exhaust manifolds Components that collect gases from individual cylinders of a vehicles engine and direct them into a single exhaust pipe. Fabricated manifolds can form the core of an emissions module that includes an integrated catalytic converter (maniverter) and/or turbocharger; |
|
Pipes Utilized to connect various parts of both the hot and cold ends of an exhaust system; |
|
Hydroformed assemblies Forms in various geometric shapes, such as Y-pipes or T-pipes, which provide optimization in both design and installation as compared to conventional pipes; |
|
Elastomeric hangers and isolators Used for system installation and elimination of noise and vibration, and for the improvement of useful life; and |
|
Aftertreatment control units Computerized electronic devices that utilize embedded software to regulate the performance of active aftertreatment systems, including the control of sensors, injectors, |
11
vaporizers, pumps, heaters, valves, actuators, wiring harnesses, relays and other mechatronic components. |
For the catalytic converters, SCR system and other substrate-based devices we sell, we need to procure substrates coated with precious metals or in the case of catalytic converter systems only, purchase the complete systems. We obtain these components and systems from third parties, often at the OEMs direction, or directly from OE vehicle and engine manufacturers. See Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for more information on our sales of these products.
We supply our clean air offerings to approximately 25 light vehicle manufacturers, including five of the top 10 passenger car models produced in Europe and eight of the top 10 light truck models produced in North America for 2017. We also supply clean air products to approximately 30 manufacturers of commercial trucks, off-highway equipment and engines, and other vehicles including BMW Motorcycle, Caterpillar, CNHTC, Daimler Trucks, Deutz, FAW Truck, Ford, Harley-Davidson, John Deere, Kubota, Scania and Weichai Power.
We acquired our original clean air product line in 1967 with the acquisition of Walker Manufacturing Company, which was founded in 1888, and became one of Europes leading OE clean air systems suppliers with the acquisition of Heinrich Gillet GmbH & Co. in 1994. Throughout this document, the term Walker refers to our subsidiaries and affiliates that produce clean air products and systems.
Ride Performance Systems
Superior ride control is governed by a vehicles suspension system, including shock absorbers and struts. Shock absorbers and struts maintain the vertical loads placed on vehicle tires, helping keep the tires in contact with the road. Vehicle steering, braking, acceleration and safety depend on maintaining contact between the tires and the road. Worn shocks and struts can allow excessive transfer of the vehicles weight from side to side, known as roll; from front to rear, called pitch; or up and down, bounce. Because shock absorbers and struts are designed to control the vertical loads placed on tires, they provide resistance to excessive roll, pitch and bounce.
We design, manufacture and distribute a variety of ride performance products and systems including:
|
Shock absorbers A broad range of mechanical shock absorbers and related components for light- and heavy-duty vehicles, including twin-tube and monotube shock absorbers; |
|
Struts A complete line of struts and strut assemblies for light vehicles; |
|
Vibration control components (Clevite ® Elastomers, Axios ) Generally, rubber-to-metal bushings and mountings to reduce vibration between metal parts of a vehicle. Offerings include a broad range of suspension arms, rods and links for light- and heavy-duty vehicles; |
|
Monroe ® Intelligent Suspension Portfolio: |
|
Kinetic ® suspension technology A suite of roll-control and nearly equal wheel-loading systems ranging from simple mechanical systems to complex hydraulic systems featuring proprietary and patented technology. We have won the PACE Award for our Kinetic ® suspension technology; |
|
Dual-mode suspensionAn adaptive suspension solution used for small- and medium-sized vehicles that provides drivers a choice of two suspension modes such as comfort and sport; |
|
Semi-active and active suspension systems Shock absorbers and suspension systems such as CVSAe and ACOCAR that electronically adjust a vehicles performance based on certain inputs such as steering and braking; and |
|
Kinetic H2/CVSA Continuously Variable Semi Active suspension system (Formerly known as CES) In 2011, we won the Supplier of the Year award from Vehicle Dynamics International |
12
magazine, which recognizes outstanding achievement in global automotive suspension and chassis engineering, for the Kinetic H2/CVSA Continuously Variable Semi Active suspension system installed on the McLaren MP4-12C; and |
|
Other We also offer other ride performance products such as load assist products, springs, steering stabilizers, adjustable suspension systems, suspension kits and modular assemblies. |
We supply our ride performance offerings to approximately 25 light vehicle manufacturers, including five of the top 10 passenger car models produced in Europe and eight of the top 10 light truck models produced in North America for 2017. We also supply ride performance products and systems to approximately 40 manufacturers of commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicles including Caterpillar, Daimler Trucks, John Deere, Navistar, Paccar, Scania and Volvo Truck.
We entered the ride performance product line in 1977 with the acquisition of Monroe Auto Equipment Company, which was founded in 1916 and which introduced the worlds first modern tubular shock absorber in 1930. When the term Monroe is used in this document it refers to our subsidiaries and affiliates that produce ride performance products and systems.
Aftermarket Systems
We engineer, manufacture, market and distribute leading, brand-name products to a diversified and global aftermarket customer base. Two of the most recognized brand-name products in the automotive parts industry are Monroe ® ride performance products and Walker ® clean air products, which have been offered to consumers since the 1930s. We believe our brand equity in the aftermarket is a key asset especially as customers consolidate and distribution channels converge.
In the clean air systems aftermarket, we manufacture, market and distribute replacement mufflers for virtually all North American, European, and Asian light vehicle models under brand names including Quiet-Flow ® and Tru-Fit ® in addition to offering a variety of other related products such as pipes and catalytic converters (Walker ® Perfection). We also serve the specialty exhaust aftermarket with offerings that include Mega-Flow ® exhaust products for heavy-duty vehicle applications and DynoMax ® high performance exhaust products. We continue to emphasize product-value differentiation with other aftermarket brands such as Walker ® , Thrush ® and Fonos .
In the ride performance aftermarket, we manufacture, market and distribute replacement shock absorbers for virtually all North American, European and Asian light vehicle models under several brand names including Gas-Matic ® , Sensa-Trac ® , Monroe ® Reflex ® and Monroe ® Adventure , Quick-Strut ® , as well as Clevite ® Elastomers and Axios for elastomeric vibration control components. We also sell ride performance offerings for commercial truck and other aftermarket segments, such as our Gas-Magnum ® shock absorbers for the North American commercial category.
Financial Information About Geographic Areas
Refer to Note 11 of the consolidated financial statements of Tenneco Inc. included in Item 8 of this report for financial information about geographic areas.
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
We have separate and distinct sales and marketing efforts for our OE and aftermarket businesses.
For OE sales, our sales and marketing team is an integrated group of professionals, including skilled engineers and program managers, who are organized by customer and product type (e.g., ride performance and
13
clean air). Our sales and marketing teams are centered on meeting the customers needs with products and services on time; maximizing profit for our investors while financing continued growth and product development; and developing a common system approach to create a superior customer experience. Our teams provide the appropriate mix of operational and technical expertise needed to interface successfully with the OEMs. Our business capture process involves working closely with the OEM platform engineering and purchasing teams. Bidding on OE automotive platforms typically encompasses many months of engineering and business development activity. Throughout the process, our sales team, program managers and product engineers assist the OE customer in defining the projects technical and business requirements. A normal part of the process includes our engineering and sales personnel working on customers integrated product teams, and assisting with developing component/system specifications and test procedures. Given that the clean air and ride performance operations involve long-term production contracts awarded on a platform-by-platform basis, our strategy is to leverage our engineering expertise and strong customer relationships to target and win new business and increase operating margins.
For aftermarket sales and marketing, our sales force is generally organized by customer and region and covers multiple product lines. We sell aftermarket products through four primary channels of distribution: (1) the traditional three-step distribution system of full-line warehouse distributors, jobbers and installers; (2) the specialty two-step distribution system of specialty warehouse distributors that carry only specified automotive product groups and installers; (3) direct sales to retailers; and (4) direct sales to installer chains. Our aftermarket sales and marketing representatives cover all levels of the distribution channel, stimulating interest in our products and helping our products move through the distribution system. Also, to generate demand for our products from end-users, we run print, online and outdoor advertisements and offer pricing promotions. We offer business-to-business services to customers with TA-Direct, an on-line order entry and customer service tool. In addition, we maintain detailed web sites for each of our Walker ® , Monroe ® , Rancho ® , DynoMax ® , and Monroe ® brake brands and our heavy-duty products.
Manufacturing and Engineering
We focus on achieving superior product quality at the lowest delivered cost possible using productive, reliable and safe manufacturing processes to achieve that goal. Our manufacturing strategy is a component of our Tenneco Business System (TBS) which is a holistic approach to how we work that creates standardized processes and gives us a common business language across business units and geographies. By driving speed and predictability, the Tenneco Business System enables us to accelerate growth, achieve cost leadership and create high-performance teams. Manufacturing Operations is one of the value streams that comprise the Tenneco Business System. It is focused on optimizing operations across all Tenneco manufacturing facilities to drive predictable performance and become the global benchmark. Within the Manufacturing Operations value stream, there are nine principles: health and safety; environmental management; continuous improvement; design for manufacturing; total quality management; material control; visual management; total productive maintenance; and high performance teams. Our goal is to have zero accidents, zero problems with deliveries, zero quality issues, and zero waste. When we eliminate these issues, we will deliver better service to our customers because well have better quality and better cost. Well have a safer environment for our employees, and well become more predictable. We deploy new technology to differentiate our products from our competitors and to achieve higher quality and productivity. We continue to adapt our capacity to customer demand, both expanding capabilities in growth areas as well as reallocating capacity away from segments in decline.
Clean Air
We operate 64 clean air manufacturing facilities worldwide, of which 16 facilities are located in North America, 21 in Europe and South America, and 27 in Asia Pacific. We operate 17 of the manufacturing facilities in Asia Pacific through joint ventures in which we hold a controlling interest. We operate five clean air engineering and technical facilities worldwide and share three other such facilities with our ride performance operations. Of the five clean air engineering and technical facilities, one is located in North America, two in
14
Europe, and two in Asia Pacific. In addition, two joint ventures in which we hold a noncontrolling interest operate a total of two manufacturing facilities in Europe.
Our clean air manufacturing operations are organized by core competency: final assembly welding, muffler manufacturing, catalytic converter canning, pipe bending, pipe making and stamping. All sites are deploying a focused factory operating model around these competencies, promoting efficient production and material management in a safe environment. Effective sharing of best business practices and engaged employees enable us to rapidly improve manufacturing operations to best in class. To continuously drive improvement we deployed and operate within the Tenneco Business System, which focuses on execution of Tenneco requirements in seven specific areas (total quality management, total productive maintenance, continuous improvement, visual factory, safety, environmental, and materials management).
We continue to invest in equipment, infrastructure and new processes to remain competitive, serve our customers and deliver industry cost leadership. Our industry leading global clean air manufacturing footprint employs a strategy of final assembly JIT (just in time) manufacturing sites close to our customers and centres of excellence for component manufacturing. Most recently manufacturing has continued to develop laser welding for various products including mixer production, introduced precision assembly for acoustic valves and increased levels of automation across all core competencies.
To strengthen our position as a Tier 1 OE systems supplier, we have developed some of our clean air manufacturing operations into just-in-time or JIT systems. In this system, a JIT facility located close to our OE customers manufacturing plant receives product components from both our manufacturing operations and independent suppliers, and then assembles and ships products to the OEMs on an as-needed basis. To manage the JIT functions and material flow, we have advanced computerized material requirements planning systems linked with our customers and supplier partners resource management systems. We have 25 clean air JIT assembly facilities worldwide, of which four facilities are located in North America, nine in Europe, and 12 in Asia Pacific.
Our engineering capabilities include advanced predictive design tools, advanced prototyping processes and state-of-the-art testing equipment. These technological capabilities make us a full system integrator to the OEMs, supplying complete emission control systems from the manifold to the tailpipe, to provide full emission and noise control. We expanded our engineering capabilities with acquisitions in 2007 and 2012 of Combustion Component Associates technology for use in mobile emission and stationary engine applications, respectively. That technology, with its urea and hydrocarbon injectors, electronic controls and software, is marketed and sold globally under the XNOx ® name for use in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and other exhaust aftertreatment systems. We also offer a complete suite of alternative full system NOx aftertreatment technologies, including the Hydrocarbon Lean NOx Catalyst (HC-LNC) technology under joint development with General Electric, and Solid SCR technology licensed from Amminex, an engineering and manufacturing company located in Denmark. We also developed advanced predictive engineering tools, including KBM&E (Knowledge Based Manufacturing & Engineering). The innovation of our KBM&E (which we call TEN-KBM&E) is a modular toolbox set of CAD embedded applications for manufacturing and engineering compliant design. The encapsulated TEN-KBM&E content is driven by an analytical method which continuously captures and updates the knowledge of our main manufacturing and engineering processes. Our global engineering capabilities are standardized through the use of the ATLAS Global PDM (Product Data Management) system, enabling a more efficient transfer of knowledge around the world.
Ride Performance
We operate 28 ride performance manufacturing facilities worldwide, of which nine facilities are located in North America, ten in Europe and South America, and nine in Asia Pacific. We operate two of the facilities through joint ventures in which we hold a controlling interest, one in Europe and another one in Asia. We operate seven engineering and technical facilities worldwide and share three other such facilities with our clean air operations. Of the seven ride performance engineering and technical facilities, two are located in North America, four in Europe and South America, and one in Asia Pacific.
15
Within each of our ride performance manufacturing facilities, operations are organized by product (e.g., shocks, struts and vibration control products) and include computer numerically controlled and conventional machine centers; tube milling and drawn-over-mandrel manufacturing equipment; metal inert gas and resistance welding; powdered metal pressing and sintering; chrome plating; stamping; and assembly/test capabilities. Our manufacturing systems incorporate cell-based designs, allowing work-in-process to move through the operation with greater speed and flexibility.
To strengthen our position as a Tier 1 OE module supplier, we have developed four of our ride performance manufacturing facilities into JIT assembly facilities located in Europe and India.
In designing our shock absorbers and struts, we use advanced engineering and test capabilities to provide product reliability, endurance and performance. Our engineering capabilities feature advanced computer-aided design equipment and testing facilities. Our dedication to innovative solutions has led to such technological advances as:
|
Adaptive damping systems adapt to the vehicles motion to better control undesirable vehicle motions; |
|
Electronically adjustable suspensions change suspension performance based on a variety of inputs such as steering, braking, vehicle height, and velocity; and |
|
Air leveling systems manually or automatically adjust the height of the vehicle. |
Conventional shock absorbers and struts generally develop an appropriate compromise between ride comfort and handling. Our innovative gas-charged shock absorbers and struts provide both ride comfort and vehicle control, resulting in improved handling, reduced vibration and a wider range of vehicle control. This technology can be found in our premium quality OESpectrum ® shock absorbers. We further enhanced this technology by adding the SafeTech fluon banded piston, which improves shock absorber performance and durability. We introduced the Monroe ® Reflex ® shock absorber, which incorporates our Impact Sensor device. This technology permits the shock absorber to automatically switch in a matter of milliseconds between firm and soft compression damping when the vehicle encounters rough road conditions, and thus maintaining better tire-to-road contact and improving handling and safety. We developed the Quick-Strut ® which simplifies and shortens the installation of aftermarket struts. This technology combines the spring and upper mount into a single, complete module, eliminating the need for special tools and skills required previously. We have also developed an innovative computerized electronic suspension system, which features dampers developed by Tenneco and electronic valves designed by Öhlins Racing AB. The Continuously Variable Semi Active (CVSA) electronic suspension ride performance system is featured on Audi, Volvo, Ford, Volkswagen, BMW, and Mercedes Benz vehicles. To help make electronic suspension more affordable to a wider range of vehicles, we are designing an innovative, electronically-controlled DRiV suspension system that features hydraulic valve technology we purchased in 2014 from Sturman Industries.
Aftermarket
We operate six Aftermarket production facilities worldwide, three in North America, one in Europe, and two in Asia Pacific. We share engineering testing facilities with our clean air and ride performance operations. In addition, we operate 27 distribution centers worldwide, four in North America, one in South American, 14 in Europe, and 8 in Asia Pacific. Eight of these are third party logistics providers.
Quality Management
Tennecos Quality Management System is an important part of product and process development and validation. Design engineers establish performance and reliability standards in the products design stage, and use prototypes to confirm that the component/system can be manufactured to specifications. Quality Management is also integrated into the launch and manufacturing process, with team members at every stage of the work-in-process, ensuring finished goods are being fabricated to meet customers requirements.
16
The Quality Management System is detailed in Tennecos Global Quality Manual. The Global Quality Manual complies with the IATF 16949:2016 and ISO 9001:2015 specifications, and customers specific requirements. We continue to implement and monitor all new and proposed required standards in advance of their due date. All of Tennecos manufacturing facilities, where it has been determined that certification is necessary to serve the customer, or would provide an advantage in securing additional business, have successfully achieved the applicable standards requirements. Additionally, each employee is expected to follow the relevant standards, policies, and procedures contained in the Global Quality Manual.
Global Procurement Management
Our direct and indirect material costs represent a significant component of our cost structure. To ensure that our material acquisition process provides both a local and global competitive advantage, in addition to meeting regional legislative requirements, we have designed globally integrated standard processes which are managed by global teams of commodity specialists. Each global commodity strategy is tailored to regional requirements while leveraging our global scale to deliver the most cost effective solutions at a local level.
Business Strategy
We strive to strengthen our global market position by designing, manufacturing, delivering and marketing technologically innovative clean air and ride performance products and systems for OEMs and the aftermarket. We work toward achieving a balanced mix of products, markets and customers by capitalizing on emerging trends, specific regional preferences and changing customer requirements. We target both mature and developing markets for light vehicles, commercial trucks, off-highway engines and other vehicle or engine applications. We further enhance our operations by focusing on operational excellence in all functional areas.
The key components of our business strategy are described below:
Develop and Commercialize Advanced Technologies
We develop and commercialize technologies that allow us to expand into new, fast-growing market segments and serve our existing customers. By anticipating customer needs and preferences, we design advanced technologies that meet global market needs. For example, to help our customers meet the increasingly stringent emissions regulations being introduced around the world, we offer several technologies designed to reduce NOx emissions from passenger, commercial truck and off-highway vehicles. These technologies include an integrated Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) system that incorporates our XNOx ® technology, electrical valves for diesel-powered vehicles with low-pressure exhaust gas recirculation systems, and diesel and gasoline particulate filters. We also offer a NOx absorber and a hydrocarbon lean NOx catalyst system, thermal management solutions, such as our T.R.U.E.-Clean ® active diesel particulate filter system and, through a consortium, thermoelectric generators that convert waste exhaust heat into electrical energy.
We expect demand for our products to continue to rise over the next several years. Advanced aftertreatment exhaust systems are required to comply with emissions regulations that affect light, commercial truck and off-highway vehicles as well as locomotive, marine and stationary engines. In addition, vehicle manufacturers are offering greater comfort, handling and safety features with products such as electronic suspension and adjustable dampers. Our CVSA electronic suspension dampers, which we co-developed with Öhlins Racing AB, are now sold to Volvo, Audi, Mercedes, VW, BMW, and Ford, among others, and our Clevite ® engineered elastomers to manufacturers with unique NVH requirements. Our newest electronic suspension product DRiV is the first industry example of multiple digital valves coupled with smart switching for use in ride performance products that results in faster response, lighter weight, and reduced power consumption compared to existing analog products.
We continue to focus on introducing highly engineered systems and complex assemblies and modules that provide value-added solutions to our customers and increase our content on vehicles. Having many of our
17
engineering and manufacturing facilities integrated electronically, we believe, has helped our products continue to be selected for inclusion in top-selling vehicles. In addition, our just-in-time and in-line sequencing manufacturing processes and distribution capabilities have enabled us to be more responsive to our customers needs.
Penetrate Adjacent Market Segments
We seek to penetrate a variety of adjacent sales opportunities and achieve growth in higher-margin businesses by applying our design, engineering and manufacturing capabilities. For example, we aggressively leverage our technology and engineering leadership in clean air and ride performance into adjacent sales opportunities for heavy-duty trucks, buses, agricultural equipment, construction machinery and other vehicles in other regions around the world.
We design and launch clean air products for commercial truck and off-highway customers such as Caterpillar, for whom we are their global diesel clean air system integrator, John Deere, Navistar, Deutz, Daimler Trucks, Scania, Weichai Power, FAW Group and Kubota.
We engineer and build modular NOx-reduction systems for large engines that meet standards of the International Maritime Organization, among others. In 2015, we received three Product Design Assessment (PDA) certificates from the American Bureau of Shipping, one of the worlds leading ship-classification societies, and two Approved-In-Principle (AIP) certificates from DNV GL, another leading global classification society and recognized advisor of the maritime industry.
Our revenues generated by our commercial truck, off-highway and other business sectors were 12 percent of our total annual OE revenues in 2017 and 11 percent in 2016.
Expand and Adjust Manufacturing Footprint and Engineering Capabilities
We continue to expand and adjust our global footprint to serve OE and aftermarket customers, building our capabilities to engineer and produce cost competitive, cutting-edge products around the world. In 2015, we opened new facilities in Jeffersonville, Indiana, Sanand, India, Stanowice, Poland and Suzhou, China. We also expanded our manufacturing operations in Celaya, Mexico that produce dampers and other ride performance products for light vehicles and commercial trucks and in Tredegar, U.K. to support growth on significant incremental new business. In addition, we built out our engineering capabilities in Poland, as well as the expansion of our testing capabilities in Germany. In 2016, we opened new facilities in Spring Hill, Tennessee and Lansing, Michigan to support our customers growth. We also expanded our manufacturing operations in Puebla, Mexico and Birmingham, UK to support growth on significant incremental business. In addition, we built out our testing capabilities in Zwickau, Germany. In 2017, we continued expanding our operations in Puebla as well as expanded capacity in Cangzhou, China. We also expanded production in our Poland plant to meet increasing demand for our Aftermarket ride control products.
Besides expanding our manufacturing footprint and engineering capabilities to serve new customers or markets, we are re-aligning our production, supply chain and other operational functions to ensure standardization, remove redundancies, reduce transit costs, leverage economies of scale, and optimize manufacturing productivity. Adjusting to customer volumes we closed our assembly plant in St. Petersburg, Russia in 2016. In June 2017, we announced the closing of our Clean Air manufacturing plant in OSullivan Beach, Australia when General Motors and Toyota end vehicle production in the country, which occurred in October 2017.
Maintain Our Aftermarket Leadership
We provide value differentiation by creating product extensions bearing our various brands. For example, we offer Monroe ® OESpectrum ® dampers, Walker ® Quiet-Flow ® mufflers, Rancho ® ride performance products,
18
DynoMax ® exhaust products and Walker Ultra ® catalytic converters, and in Europe, Walker and Aluminox Pro mufflers. Further, we market Monroe ® Springs, Monroe ® Steering and Suspension, and Monro-Magnum ® (bus and truck shock line) in Europe and continue to grow our Monroe ® Brake pads in North America. We continue to explore other opportunities for developing new product lines that will be marketed under our existing, well-known brands.
We strive to gain additional market share in the aftermarket business by adding new product offerings and increasing our market coverage of existing brands and products. For one, we offer an innovative ride performance product, the Quick-Strut ® , that combines the dampers, spring and upper mount into a single, complete module that simplifies and shortens the installation process, eliminating the need for the special tools and skills required previously. Additionally, we find ways to benefit from the consolidation of, and the regional expansion by, our customers and gain business from our competitors given our strength and understanding in the markets and channels in which we do business.
As the number of global vehicles in operation continue to increase and age, we intend to support the independent Aftermarket growth by ensuring we have the proper product coverage, manufacturing capacity, distribution capability, customer relationships, and world-leading marketing, training, and support services.
Our success in the aftermarket strengthens our competitive position with OEMs, and vice versa. We gain timely market and product knowledge that can be used to modify and enhance our offerings for greater customer acceptance. We also can readily introduce aftermarket products by leveraging our experience in the OE market. An example of such is our suite of manifold converters and diesel particulate filters which were first sold in the OE market and then tailored for the aftermarket.
Execute Focused Transactions
We have successfully identified and capitalized on acquisitions, alliances and divestitures to achieve strategic growth and alignment. Through these transactions, we have (1) expanded our product portfolio with complementary technologies; (2) realized incremental business from existing customers; (3) gained access to new customers; (4) achieved leadership positions in geographic regions outside North America; and (5) re-focused on areas that will contribute to our profitable growth.
We have a licensing agreement for T.R.U.E.-Clean ® , an exhaust aftertreatment technology used for automatic and active regeneration of Diesel Particulate Filters (DPFs), with Woodward Governor Company. This is an example of a technology which complements our array of existing clean air products, allowing us to provide integrated exhaust aftertreatment systems to commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle manufacturers.
In July 2015, we announced our intention to discontinue our Marzocchi motorcycle fork suspension product line and our mountain bike suspension product line, and liquidate our Marzocchi operations. In November 2015, we closed on the sale of certain assets related to our Marzocchi mountain bike suspension product line to the affiliates of Fox Factory Holding Corp.; and in December 2015, we closed on the sale of the Marzocchi motorcycle fork product line to an Italian company, VRM S.p.A.
In March 2016, we completed the disposition of the Gijon, Spain plant and signed an agreement to transfer ownership of the manufacturing facility in Gijon to German private equity fund Quantum Capital Partners A.G. (QCP). The transfer to QCP was effective March 31, 2016 and under a three year manufacturing agreement, QCP will also continue as a supplier to Tenneco.
In April 2017, we sold our 49% equity interest in the Futaba-Tenneco U.K. joint venture entity which produces stamped metal parts to our partner in that joint venture, Futaba Industrial Co., Ltd.
We intend to continue to pursue strategic alliances, joint ventures, acquisitions and other transactions that complement or enhance our existing products, technology, systems development efforts, customer base and/or
19
global presence. We will align with companies that have proven products, proprietary technology, advanced research capabilities, broad geographic reach, and/or strong market positions to further strengthen our product leadership, technology position, global reach and customer relationships.
Adapt Cost Structure to Economic Realities
We aggressively respond to difficult economic environments, aligning our operations to any resulting reductions in production levels and replacement demand and executing comprehensive restructuring and cost-reduction initiatives. For example, on January 31, 2013, we announced our intent to reduce structural costs in Europe by approximately $60 million annually. With the disposition of the Gijon, Spain plant, which was completed at the end of the first quarter of 2016, the annualized rate essentially reached our target of $55 million, at the current exchange rates. In November 2015, we closed on the sale of certain assets related to our Marzocchi mountain bike suspension product line to the affiliates of Fox Factory Holding Corp.; and in December 2015, we closed on the sale of the Marzocchi motorcycle fork product line to an Italian company, VRM S.p.A. These actions were a part of our ongoing efforts to optimize our Ride Performance product line globally while continuously improving our operations and increasing profitability. In June 2017, we announced the closing of our Clean Air manufacturing plant in OSullivan Beach, Australia when General Motors and Toyota end vehicle production in the country, which occurred in October 2017. All such restructuring activities related to this initiative are expected to be completed by the first quarter of 2018.
Strengthen Operational Excellence
We will continue to focus on operational excellence by optimizing our manufacturing footprint, enhancing our Six Sigma processes and Lean productivity tools, developing further our engineering capabilities, managing the complexities of our global supply chain to realize purchasing economies of scale while satisfying diverse and global requirements, and supporting our businesses with robust information technology systems. We will make investments in our operations and infrastructure as required to achieve our strategic goals. We will be mindful of the changing market conditions that might necessitate adjustments to our resources and manufacturing capacity around the world. We will remain committed to protecting the environment as well as the health and safety of our employees.
Environmental Matters
For additional information regarding environmental matters, see Item 3, Legal Proceedings, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources and Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8.
Employees
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 32,000 employees of whom approximately 44 percent were covered by collective bargaining agreements. European works councils cover 15 percent of our total employees, a majority of whom are also included under collective bargaining agreements. Several of our existing labor agreements covering plants in Mexico, Argentina, Brazil, Europe, India and Thailand are expiring in 2018. We regard our employee relations as satisfactory.
Other
The principal raw material that we use is steel. We obtain steel from a number of sources pursuant to various contractual and other arrangements. We believe that an adequate supply of steel can presently be obtained from a number of different domestic and foreign suppliers. We address price increases by evaluating alternative materials and processes, reviewing material substitution opportunities, increasing component sourcing and parts assembly in best cost countries, strategically pursuing regional and global purchasing strategies for specific commodities, and aggressively negotiating with our customers to allow us to recover these higher costs from them.
20
We hold a number of domestic and foreign patents and trademarks relating to our products and businesses. We manufacture and distribute our aftermarket products primarily under the Walker ® and Monroe ® brand names, which are well-recognized in the marketplace and are registered trademarks. We also market certain of our clean air products to OE manufacturers under the names Solid SCR and XNOx ® . The patents, trademarks and other intellectual property owned by or licensed to us are important in the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of our products.
21
Exhibit 99.2
ITEM 6. |
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. |
The following data should be read in conjunction with Item 7 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Operations and our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. These items include discussions of factors affecting comparability of the information shown below.
In the first quarter of 2018, we revised our reportable segments to consist of the following three segments: Clean Air, Ride Performance and Aftermarket. The new reportable segments, which are also our operating segments, align with how the Chief Operating Decision Maker allocates resources and assesses performance against our key growth strategies. Costs related to other business activities, primarily corporate headquarter functions, are disclosed separately from the three operating segments as Other. We evaluate segment performance based primarily on earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and noncontrolling interests. Products are transferred between segments and geographic areas on a basis intended to reflect as nearly as possible the market value of the products. Prior period segment information has been retrospectively recast to conform to reflect our current segmentation.
TENNECO INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017(a) | 2016(b) | 2015(c) | 2014(d) | 2013(e) | ||||||||||||||||
(Millions Except Share and Per Share Amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Statements of Income Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales and operating revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||
Clean Air Division |
$ | 6,216 | $ | 5,764 | $ | 5,377 | $ | 5,454 | $ | 5,077 | ||||||||||
Ride Performance Division |
1,807 | 1,593 | 1,545 | 1,633 | 1,567 | |||||||||||||||
Aftermarket Division |
1,251 | 1,242 | 1,259 | 1,294 | 1,280 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 9,274 | $ | 8,599 | $ | 8,181 | $ | 8,381 | $ | 7,924 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and noncontrolling interests |
||||||||||||||||||||
Clean Air Division |
$ | 421 | $ | 432 | $ | 371 | $ | 375 | $ | 346 | ||||||||||
Ride Performance Division |
61 | 97 | 63 | 73 | 13 | |||||||||||||||
Aftermarket Division |
178 | 191 | 174 | 178 | 159 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
(243 | ) | (204 | ) | (100 | ) | (137 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 417 | $ | 516 | $ | 508 | $ | 489 | $ | 422 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Interest expense (net of interest capitalized) |
73 | 92 | 67 | 91 | 80 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
70 | | 146 | 131 | 122 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income |
274 | 424 | 295 | 267 | 220 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
67 | 68 | 54 | 42 | 38 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income attributable to Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 207 | $ | 356 | $ | 241 | $ | 225 | $ | 182 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
52,796,184 | 55,939,135 | 59,678,309 | 60,734,022 | 60,474,492 | |||||||||||||||
Diluted |
53,026,911 | 56,407,436 | 60,193,150 | 61,782,508 | 61,594,062 | |||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock |
$ | 3.93 | $ | 6.36 | $ | 4.05 | $ | 3.70 | $ | 3.02 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock |
$ | 3.91 | $ | 6.31 | $ | 4.01 | $ | 3.64 | $ | 2.96 | ||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
$ | 1.00 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | |
2
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
(Millions Except Ratio and Percent
Amounts) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data (at year end): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets(f) |
$ | 4,842 | $ | 4,346 | $ | 3,970 | $ | 3,996 | $ | 3,817 | ||||||||||
Short-term debt |
83 | 90 | 86 | 60 | 83 | |||||||||||||||
Long-term debt(f) |
1,358 | 1,294 | 1,124 | 1,055 | 1,006 | |||||||||||||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
42 | 40 | 41 | 34 | 20 | |||||||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. shareholders equity |
696 | 573 | 425 | 495 | 432 | |||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
46 | 47 | 39 | 40 | 39 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total equity |
742 | 620 | 464 | 535 | 471 | |||||||||||||||
Statement of Cash Flows Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities(g)(i) |
$ | 517 | $ | 374 | $ | 415 | $ | 248 | $ | 407 | ||||||||||
Net cash used by investing activities(h)(i) |
(300 | ) | (229 | ) | (192 | ) | (210 | ) | (135 | ) | ||||||||||
Net cash used by financing activities(g) |
(251 | ) | (86 | ) | (183 | ) | (18 | ) | (205 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash payments for plant, property and equipment |
(394 | ) | (325 | ) | (286 | ) | (328 | ) | (244 | ) | ||||||||||
Other Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA including noncontrolling interests(j) |
$ | 641 | $ | 728 | $ | 711 | $ | 697 | $ | 627 | ||||||||||
Ratio of EBITDA including noncontrolling interests to interest expense |
8.78 | 7.91 | 10.61 | 7.66 | 7.84 | |||||||||||||||
Ratio of net debt (total debt less cash and cash equivalents) to EBITDA including noncontrolling interests(k) |
1.75 | 1.42 | 1.30 | 1.19 | 1.29 | |||||||||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(l) |
4.26 | 4.55 | 5.73 | 4.38 | 4.32 |
NOTE: Our consolidated financial statements for the three years ended December 31, 2017, which are discussed in the following notes, are included under Item 8.
(a) |
2017 includes $72 million in restructuring and related costs primarily related to closing a Clean Air Belgian JIT plant in response to the end of production on a customer platform, closing an OE Clean Air manufacturing plant and downsizing Ride Performance operations in Australia, the required relocation of our Beijing Ride Performance plant outside of the Beijing area and other cost improvement initiatives. Of the $72 million we incurred in restructuring and related costs, $3 million was related to asset write-downs. The tax expense recorded in 2017 includes a net provisional tax expense of $43 million for one-time transition tax on deemed repatriation of previously deferred foreign earnings under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This amount is subject to change as we refine our earnings and profits calculations and as additional guidance is published. The Company will continue to refine its estimates throughout the measurement period provided for in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118, or until its accounting is complete. We remeasured U.S. deferred taxes from an applicable federal rate of 35% to the new statutory rate of 21% at which they are expected to be utilized, recording a $46 million provisional expense. The tax expense recorded in 2017 included a net tax benefit of $74 million relating to recognizing a U.S. tax benefit for foreign taxes. |
(b) |
2016 includes $36 million in restructuring and related costs primarily related to manufacturing footprint improvements in North America Ride Performance, headcount reduction and cost improvement initiatives in Europe and China Clean Air, South America and Australia. Of the total $36 million we incurred in restructuring and related costs, $6 million was related to asset write-downs. 2016 also includes a net tax benefit of $110 million primarily relating to the recognition of a U.S. tax benefit for foreign taxes, $24 million in pre-tax interest charges related to the refinancing of our senior notes due in 2020 and $72 million in pension buyout charges. |
(c) |
2015 includes $63 million of restructuring and related costs primarily related to the European cost reduction efforts, exiting the Marzocchi suspension business, headcount reductions in Australia and South America, and the closure of a JIT plant in Australia. Of the total $63 million we incurred in restructuring and related |
3
costs, $10 million was related to asset write-downs and $4 million was in charges related to pension benefits. |
(d) |
2014 includes $49 million of restructuring and related costs primarily related to the European cost reduction efforts, headcount reductions in Australia and South America, the sale of a closed facility in Cozad, Nebraska and costs related to organizational changes. Of the total $49 million we incurred in restructuring and related costs, $3 million was related to non-cash asset write downs and $2 million was related to a non-cash charge on the sale of a closed facility. 2014 also includes $32 million in charges related to postretirement benefits, of which $21 million was a non-cash charge related to payments made to retirement plan participants out of pension assets and $11 million related to an adjustment to the postretirement medical liability, and $13 million in pre-tax interest charges related to the refinancing of our senior credit facility. |
(e) |
2013 includes $78 million of restructuring and related costs primarily related to European cost reduction efforts including the planned closing of the ride performance plant in Gijon, Spain and intended reductions to the workforce at our ride performance plant in Sint-Truiden, our exit from the distribution of aftermarket exhaust products and ending production of leaf springs in Australia, headcount reductions in various regions, and the net impact of freezing our defined benefit plans in the United Kingdom. Of the total $78 million we incurred in restructuring and related costs, $3 million was related to non-cash asset write downs. |
(f) |
In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the associated debt liability. For public business entities, the standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this update is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. We adopted this standard for the first quarter of 2015 and applied retrospectively. The balance for unamortized debt issuance costs was $13 million at both December 31, 2017 and 2016, $12 million at December 31, 2015, $14 million at December 31, 2014 and $13 million at December 31, 2013. |
(g) |
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2016-09, CompensationStock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, as part of its initiative to reduce complexity in accounting standards. The areas for simplification in this update involve several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. For public business entities, the standard is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. We adopted this standard for the first quarter of 2017 and applied prospectively with the exception of the cash flow statements according to the guidance. Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of Tenneco Inc. located in Part II Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplemental Data is incorporated herein by reference. |
(h) |
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2016-18, Statement of Cash FlowsRestricted Cash (Topic 230) to eliminate diversity in practice in the presentation of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. Under this standard, the change in restricted cash is no longer presented as an investing activity in Statement of Cash Flows. The change in restricted cash previously recorded as an investing activity was a decrease of $1 million for 2017 and 2016, an increase of $2 million for 2015 and 2014, and a decrease of $5 million for 2013. |
(i) |
In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2016-15, Statement of Cash FlowsClassification of certain cash receipts and cash payments (Topic 230). This Update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. The retrospective adoption resulted in the reclassification of cash received to settle the deferred purchase price of factored receivables from operating to investing activities in the statement of cash flows. The deferred purchase price amounts of $112 million for 2017, $110 million for 2016, $113 million for 2015, $131 million for 2014 and $126 million for 2013 have been reclassified from operating activities to investing activities. |
(j) |
EBITDA including noncontrolling interests is a non-GAAP measure defined as net income before extraordinary items, cumulative effect of changes in accounting principle, interest expense, income taxes, |
4
depreciation and amortization and noncontrolling interests. We use EBITDA including noncontrolling interests, together with GAAP measures, to evaluate and compare our operating performance on a consistent basis between time periods and with other companies that compete in our markets but which may have different capital structures and tax positions, which can have an impact on the comparability of interest expense, noncontrolling interests and tax expense. We also believe that using this measure allows us to understand and compare operating performance both with and without depreciation expense. We believe EBITDA including noncontrolling interests is useful to our investors and other parties for these same reasons. |
EBITDA including noncontrolling interests should not be used as a substitute for net income or for net cash provided by operating activities prepared in accordance with GAAP. It should also be noted that EBITDA including noncontrolling interests may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies and, furthermore, that it excludes expenditures for debt financing, taxes and future capital requirements that are essential to our ongoing business operations. For these reasons, EBITDA including noncontrolling interests is of value to management and investors only as a supplement to, and not in lieu of, GAAP results. EBITDA including noncontrolling interests are derived from the statements of income (loss) as follows:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 207 | $ | 356 | $ | 241 | $ | 225 | $ | 182 | ||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
67 | 68 | 54 | 42 | 38 | |||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
70 | | 146 | 131 | 122 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net of interest capitalized |
73 | 92 | 67 | 91 | 80 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of other intangibles |
224 | 212 | 203 | 208 | 205 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total EBITDA including noncontrolling interests |
$ | 641 | $ | 728 | $ | 711 | $ | 697 | $ | 627 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(k) |
We present the ratio of net debt (total debt less cash and cash equivalents) to EBITDA including noncontrolling interests because management believes it is a useful measure of Tennecos credit position and progress toward reducing leverage. The calculation is limited in that we may not always be able to use cash to repay debt on a dollar-for-dollar basis. Net debt balances are derived from the balance sheets as follows: |
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Debt |
$ | 1,441 | $ | 1,384 | $ | 1,210 | $ | 1,115 | $ | 1,089 | ||||||||||
Total Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
318 | 349 | 288 | 285 | 280 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net Debt |
$ | 1,123 | $ | 1,035 | $ | 922 | $ | 830 | $ | 809 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(l) |
For purposes of computing this ratio, earnings generally consist of income before income taxes and fixed charges excluding capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of interest expense, the portion of rental expense considered representative of the interest factor and capitalized interest. See Exhibit 12 to this Form 10-K for the calculation of this ratio. |
5
Exhibit 99.3
ITEM 7. |
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. |
The following discussion should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in Exhibit 99.4 attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K. All references to notes to our consolidated financial statements refer to the financial statements included in Exhibit 99.4 attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K. The following discussion has been updated subsequent to the filing of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 to reflect a change in reportable segments and the adoption of certain new accounting standards in the first quarter of 2018.
Executive Summary
We are one of the worlds leading manufacturers of clean air and ride performance products and systems for light vehicle, commercial truck and off-highway applications. We also engineer, manufacture, market and distribute leading brand name products to a diversified and global aftermarket customer base. Both original equipment (OE) vehicle designers and manufacturers and the repair and replacement markets, or aftermarket, are served globally through leading brands, including Monroe ® , Rancho ® , Clevite ® Elastomers, Axios , Kinetic ® and Fric-Rot ride performance products and Walker ® , XNOx ® , Fonos , DynoMax ® and Thrush ® clean air products. We serve more than 80 different original equipment manufacturers and commercial truck and off-highway engine manufacturers, and our products are included on six of the top 10 car models produced for sale in Europe and nine of the top 10 light truck models produced for sale in North America for 2017. Our aftermarket customers are comprised of full-line and specialty warehouse distributors, retailers, jobbers, installer chains and car dealers. As of December 31, 2017, we operated 92 manufacturing facilities worldwide and employed approximately 32,000 people to service our customers demands.
Factors that continue to be critical to our success include winning new business awards, managing our overall global manufacturing footprint to ensure proper placement and workforce levels in line with business needs, maintaining competitive wages and benefits, maximizing efficiencies in manufacturing processes and reducing overall costs. In addition, our ability to adapt to key industry trends, such as a shift in consumer preferences to other vehicles in response to higher fuel costs and other economic and social factors, increasing technologically sophisticated content, changing aftermarket distribution channels, increasing environmental standards and extended product life of automotive parts, also play a critical role in our success. Other factors that are critical to our success include adjusting to economic challenges such as increases in the cost of raw materials and our ability to successfully reduce the impact of any such cost increases through material substitutions, cost reduction initiatives and other methods.
For 2017, light vehicle production continued to improve from recent years in some of the geographic regions in which we operate. Light vehicle production was up three percent in Europe, 20 percent in South America, two percent in China and seven percent in India. North America light vehicle production was down four percent.
In the first quarter of 2018, we changed our reportable segments. The new reporting segments (Clean Air, Ride Performance and Aftermarket) align with how the Chief Operating Decision Maker allocates resources and assesses performance against our key growth strategies. Costs related to other business activities, primarily corporate headquarter functions, are disclosed separately from the three operating segments as Other. Prior period segmentation has been revised to conform to current year presentation.
Total revenue for 2017 was $9,274 million, up eight percent from $8,599 million in 2016, on strong global light vehicle and commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle revenues, driven by the Clean Air and Ride Performance product lines. Excluding the impact of currency and substrate sales, revenue was up $447 million from $6,571 million to $7,018 million. The increase in revenues was driven primarily by stronger OE light vehicle volumes and higher commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle revenues in all regions as well as new platforms.
Cost of sales: Cost of sales for 2017 was $7,809 million, or 84.2 percent of sales, compared to $7,116 million, or 82.8 percent of sales in 2016. The following table lists the primary drivers behind the change in cost of sales ($ millions).
Year ended December 31, 2016 |
$ | 7,116 | ||
Volume and mix |
550 | |||
Material |
35 | |||
Currency exchange rates |
75 | |||
Restructuring |
19 | |||
Other costs |
14 | |||
|
|
|||
Year ended December 31, 2017 |
$ | 7,809 | ||
|
|
The increase in cost of sales was due to the year-over-year increase in volume, higher net material costs, higher other costs, mainly manufacturing, higher restructuring costs and the impact of currency exchange rates.
Gross margin: Revenue less cost of sales for 2017 was $1,465 million, or 15.8 percent of sales, versus $1,483 million, or 17.2 percent of sales in 2016. The effect on gross margin resulting from year-over-year increase in volume and favorable currency impact was more than offset by higher net material costs, higher restructuring costs and higher other costs, mainly manufacturing.
Engineering, research and development: Engineering, research and development expense was $158 million and $154 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A): Selling, general and administrative expense was up $123 million in 2017, at $636 million, compared to $513 million in 2016. 2017 included a $132 million antitrust settlement accrual.
Depreciation and amortization: Depreciation and amortization expense was $224 million and $212 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Goodwill impairment: As a result of our goodwill impairment evaluation in the fourth quarter of 2017, we determined that the estimated fair value of the Europe and South America Ride Performance reporting unit was lower than its carrying value. Accordingly, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $11 million in the fourth quarter, which has been reallocated based on the Companys revised reportable segments and reporting units. We reached this determination based on updated long-term projections for the Europe and South America Ride Performance reporting unit provided by the Companys annual budgeting and strategic planning process. The 2017 annual budgeting and strategic planning process indicated that the reporting units recovery period will be longer than previously expected.
Earnings before interest expense, taxes and noncontrolling interests (EBIT) was $417 million for 2017, a decrease of $99 million, when compared to $516 million in the prior year. Higher OE light vehicle and commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle revenues in all regions and new platforms were more than offset by higher manufacturing costs, higher restructuring and related costs, the antitrust settlement accrual of $132 million, a goodwill impairment charge of $11 million in Europe and South America, a warranty settlement with a customer, the timing of steel economics recoveries and continued investments in growth for new programs. EBIT for 2016 also included $72 million in pension buyout charges.
Results from Operations
Net Sales and Operating Revenues for Years 2017 and 2016
The tables below reflect our revenues for 2017 and 2016. We show the component of our OE revenue represented by substrate sales. While we generally have primary design, engineering and manufacturing
2
responsibility for OE emission control systems, we do not manufacture substrates. Substrates are porous ceramic filters coated with a catalyst - typically, precious metals such as platinum, palladium and rhodium. These are supplied to us by Tier 2 suppliers generally as directed by our OE customers. We generally earn a small margin on these components of the system. As the need for more sophisticated emission control solutions increases to meet more stringent environmental regulations, and as we capture more diesel aftertreatment business, these substrate components have been increasing as a percentage of our revenue. While these substrates dilute our gross margin percentage, they are a necessary component of an emission control system.
Our value-add content in an emission control system includes designing the system to meet environmental regulations through integration of the substrates into the system, maximizing use of thermal energy to heat up the catalyst quickly, efficiently managing airflow to reduce back pressure as the exhaust stream moves past the catalyst, managing the expansion and contraction of the emission control system components due to temperature extremes experienced by an emission control system, using advanced acoustic engineering tools to design the desired exhaust sound, minimizing the opportunity for the fragile components of the substrate to be damaged when we integrate it into the emission control system and reducing unwanted noise, vibration and harshness transmitted through the emission control system.
We present these substrate sales separately in the following table because we believe investors utilize this information to understand the impact of this portion of our revenues on our overall business and because it removes the impact of potentially volatile precious metals pricing from our revenues. While our original equipment customers generally assume the risk of precious metals pricing volatility, it impacts our reported revenues. Presenting revenues that exclude substrates used in catalytic converters and diesel particulate filters removes this impact.
Additionally, we present these reconciliations of revenues in order to reflect value-add revenues without the effect of changes in foreign currency rates. We have not reflected any currency impact in the 2016 table since this is the base period for measuring the effects of currency during 2017 on our operations. Revenues in 2017 have been adjusted to reflect a consistent currency exchange rate with 2016. We believe investors find this information useful in understanding period-to-period comparisons in our revenues.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
Substrate
Sales |
Value-add
Revenues |
Currency
Impact on Value-add Revenues |
Value-add
Revenues excluding Currency |
||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 6,216 | $ | 2,187 | $ | 4,029 | $ | 32 | $ | 3,997 | ||||||||||
Ride Performance |
1,807 | | 1,807 | 27 | 1,780 | |||||||||||||||
Aftermarket |
1,251 | | 1,251 | 10 | 1,241 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 9,274 | $ | 2,187 | $ | 7,087 | $ | 69 | $ | 7,018 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
Substrate
Sales |
Value-add
Revenues |
Currency
Impact on Value-add Revenues |
Value-add
Revenues excluding Currency |
||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 5,764 | $ | 2,028 | $ | 3,736 | $ | | $ | 3,736 | ||||||||||
Ride Performance |
1,593 | | 1,593 | | 1,593 | |||||||||||||||
Aftermarket |
1,242 | | 1,242 | | 1,242 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 8,599 | $ | 2,028 | $ | 6,571 | $ | | $ | 6,571 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Versus Year Ended December 31, 2016 Dollar and Percent Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues | Percent |
Value-add
Revenues excluding Currency |
Percent | |||||||||||||
(Millions Except Percent Amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 452 | 8 | % | $ | 261 | 7 | % | ||||||||
Ride Performance |
214 | 13 | % | 187 | 12 | % | ||||||||||
Aftermarket |
9 | 1 | % | (1 | ) | | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 675 | 8 | % | $ | 447 | 7 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Light Vehicle Industry Production by Region for Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 (According to IHS Automotive, January 2018)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 |
Increase
(Decrease) |
% Increase
(Decrease) |
|||||||||||||
(Number of Vehicles in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
North America |
17,128 | 17,837 | (709 | ) | (4 | )% | ||||||||||
Europe |
22,229 | 21,540 | 689 | 3 | % | |||||||||||
South America |
3,286 | 2,737 | 549 | 20 | % | |||||||||||
China |
27,637 | 27,064 | 573 | 2 | % | |||||||||||
India |
4,456 | 4,175 | 281 | 7 | % |
Clean Air revenue was up $452 million to $6,216 million in 2017 compared to $5,764 million in 2016. Higher volumes drove a $432 million increase due to higher light vehicle, commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle sales as well as new platforms, partially offset by unfavorable pricing and mix. Currency had a $49 million favorable impact on Clean Air revenues.
Ride Performance revenue was up $214 million to $1,807 million in 2017 compared to $1,593 million in 2016. Higher volumes drove a $192 million increase due to higher light vehicle, commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle sales as well as new platforms. Currency had a $27 million favorable impact on Ride Performance revenues.
Aftermarket revenue was up $9 million to $1,251 million in 2017 to compared to $1,242 million in 2016. Lower volumes drove a $32 million decrease, which was more than offset by favorable mix and pricing and a $10 million favorable currency impact.
Net Sales and Operating Revenues for Years 2016 and 2015
The following tables reflect our revenues for the years of 2016 and 2015. See Net Sales and Operating Revenues for Years 2017 and 2016 for a description of why we present these reconciliations of revenue. We have not reflected any currency impact in the 2015 table since this is the base period for measuring the effects of currency during 2016 on our operations. Revenues in 2016 have been adjusted to reflect a consistent currency exchange rate with 2015.
Year Ended December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
Substrate
Sales |
Value-add
Revenues |
Currency
Impact on Value-add Revenues |
Value-add
Revenues excluding Currency |
||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 5,764 | $ | 2,028 | $ | 3,736 | $ | (101 | ) | $ | 3,837 | |||||||||
Ride Performance |
1,593 | | 1,593 | (44 | ) | 1,637 | ||||||||||||||
Aftermarket |
1,242 | | 1,242 | (37 | ) | 1,279 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 8,599 | $ | 2,028 | $ | 6,571 | $ | (182 | ) | $ | 6,753 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
Year Ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
Substrate
Sales |
Value-add
Revenues |
Currency
Impact on Value-add Revenues |
Value-add
Revenues excluding Currency |
||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 5,377 | $ | 1,888 | $ | 3,489 | $ | | $ | 3,489 | ||||||||||
Ride Performance |
1,545 | | 1,545 | | 1,545 | |||||||||||||||
Aftermarket |
1,259 | | 1,259 | | 1,259 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 8,181 | $ | 1,888 | $ | 6,293 | $ | | $ | 6,293 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Versus Year Ended December 31, 2015 Dollar and Percent Increase (Decrease) |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues | Percent |
Value-add
Revenues excluding Currency |
Percent | |||||||||||||
(Millions Except Percent Amounts) | ||||||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 387 | 7 | % | $ | 348 | 10 | % | ||||||||
Ride Performance |
48 | 3 | % | 92 | 6 | % | ||||||||||
Aftermarket |
(17 | ) | (1 | )% | 20 | 2 | % | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 418 | 5 | % | $ | 460 | 7 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
Light Vehicle Industry Production by Region for Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (Updated according to IHS Automotive, January 2018)
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||
2016 | 2015 |
Increase
(Decrease) |
% Increase
(Decrease) |
|||||||||||||
(Number of Vehicles in Thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
North America |
17,837 | 17,495 | 342 | 2 | % | |||||||||||
Europe |
21,540 | 20,936 | 604 | 3 | % | |||||||||||
South America |
2,737 | 3,073 | (336 | ) | (11 | )% | ||||||||||
China |
27,064 | 23,679 | 3,385 | 14 | % | |||||||||||
India |
4,175 | 3,807 | 368 | 10 | % |
Clean Air revenue was up $387 million to $5,764 million in 2016 compared to $5,377 million in 2015. The $608 million increase in volumes due to higher light vehicle sales and new platforms was partially offset by lower commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle volume, partially offset by unfavorable pricing and mix. Currency had a $139 million unfavorable impact on Clean Air revenues.
Ride Performance revenue was up $48 million to $1,593 million in 2016 compared to $1,545 million in 2015. The $105 million increase in volumes was due to higher light vehicle sales and new platforms partially offset by lower commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle volume, and unfavorable pricing and mix. Currency had a $44 million unfavorable impact on Ride Performance revenues.
Aftermarket revenue was down $17 million to $1,242 million in 2016 compared to $1,259 million in 2015. The favorable mix and pricing impact were more than offset by a $30 million decrease in volumes and a $37 million unfavorable currency impact.
5
Earnings before Interest Expense, Income Taxes and Noncontrolling Interests (EBIT) for Years 2017 and 2016
Year Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 421 | $ | 432 | $ | (11 | ) | |||||
Ride Performance |
61 | 97 | (36 | ) | ||||||||
Aftermarket |
178 | 191 | (13 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
(243 | ) | (204 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 417 | $ | 516 | $ | (99 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The EBIT results shown in the preceding table include the following items, certain of which are discussed below under Restructuring and Other Charges, which may have an effect on the comparability of EBIT results between periods:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||
Clean Air |
||||||||
Restructuring and related expenses |
$ | 29 | $ | 7 | ||||
Ride Performance |
||||||||
Restructuring and related expenses |
29 | 15 | ||||||
Warranty settlement(1) |
7 | | ||||||
Goodwill impairment charge(2) |
7 | | ||||||
Aftermarket |
||||||||
Restructuring and related expenses |
10 | 12 | ||||||
Goodwill impairment charge(2) |
4 | | ||||||
Other |
||||||||
Restructuring and related expenses |
4 | 2 | ||||||
Pension charges / Stock vesting charges(3) |
13 | 72 | ||||||
Antitrust settlement accrual(4) |
132 | | ||||||
Gain on sale of unconsolidated JV(5) |
(5 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 230 | $ | 108 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Warranty settlement with a customer. |
(2) |
Non-cash asset impairment charge related to goodwill. |
(3) |
Charges related to pension derisking and the acceleration of restricted stock vesting in accordance with the long-term incentive plan. |
(4) |
Charges related to establishing a reserve for settlement costs necessary to resolve the companys antitrust matters globally. |
(5) |
Gain on sale of unconsolidated JV. |
EBIT for Clean Air was $421 million in 2017 compared to $432 million in 2016. The benefit from higher light vehicle and commercial truck, off-highway and other sales and new platforms was more than offset by higher restructuring and related expenses and the timing of contractual cost recovery of alloy surcharge increases. Restructuring and related expenses of $29 million and $7 million were included in EBIT for 2017 and 2016, respectively. Currency had a $2 million favorable impact on EBIT of Clean Air for 2017 when compared to 2016.
EBIT for Ride Performance was $61 million in 2017 compared to $97 million in 2016. The benefit from higher light vehicle and commercial truck, off-highway and other sales and new platforms was more than offset
6
by higher restructuring and related expenses, the timing of steel recoveries, higher manufacturing costs, a $7 million warranty settlement with a customer as well as a $7 million goodwill impairment charge. Restructuring and related expenses of $29 million and $15 million were included in EBIT for 2017 and 2016, respectively. Currency had a $2 million unfavorable impact on EBIT of Ride Performance for 2017 when compared to 2016.
EBIT for Aftermarket was $178 million in 2017 compared to $191 million in 2016 primarily due to lower volumes. Restructuring and related expenses of $10 million and $12 million were included in EBIT for 2017 and 2016, respectively. EBIT for Aftermarket also included a $4 million goodwill impairment charge. Currency had no impact on EBIT of Aftermarket for 2017 when compared to 2016.
Currency had no impact on overall company EBIT for 2017 as compared to 2016.
EBIT for Years 2016 and 2015
Year Ended December 31, | Change | |||||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||
Clean Air |
$ | 432 | $ | 371 | $ | 61 | ||||||
Ride Performance |
97 | 63 | 34 | |||||||||
Aftermarket |
191 | 174 | 17 | |||||||||
Other |
(204 | ) | (100 | ) | (104 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 516 | $ | 508 | $ | 8 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The EBIT results shown in the preceding table include the following items, certain of which are discussed below under Restructuring and Other Charges, which may have an effect on the comparability of EBIT results between periods:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||
Clean Air |
||||||||
Restructuring and related expenses |
$ | 7 | $ | 9 | ||||
Ride Performance |
||||||||
Restructuring and related expenses |
15 | 40 | ||||||
Aftermarket |
||||||||
Restructuring and related expenses |
12 | 14 | ||||||
Other |
||||||||
Restructuring and related expenses |
2 | | ||||||
Pension charges(1) |
72 | 4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 108 | $ | 67 | ||||
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Charges related to pension derisking. |
EBIT for Clean Air was $432 million in 2016 compared to $371 million in 2015. Higher light vehicle sales and new platforms as well as a $5 million benefit from the timing of a customer recovery were partially offset by lower commercial truck and off-highway vehicle revenue, higher manufacturing costs and higher SG&A and engineering expense. Restructuring and related expenses of $7 million and $9 million were included in EBIT for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Currency had an $18 million unfavorable impact on EBIT of Clean Air for 2016 when compared to 2015.
7
EBIT for Ride Performance was $97 million in 2016 compared to $63 million in 2015. The benefit from higher light vehicle sales, new platforms and lower restructuring and related expenses was partially offset by lower commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle revenue reflecting the sale of the Marzocchi specialty business and higher SG&A. Restructuring and related expenses of $15 million and $40 million were included in EBIT for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Currency had a $1 million favorable impact on EBIT of Ride Performance for 2016 when compared to 2015.
EBIT for Aftermarket was $191 million in 2016 compared to $174 million in 2015 primarily driven by favorable pricing and lower material costs, partially offset by lower volumes. Restructuring and related expenses of $12 million and $14 million were included in EBIT for 2016 and 2015, respectively. Currency had a $16 million unfavorable impact on EBIT of Aftermarket for 2016 when compared to 2015.
Currency had a $33 million unfavorable impact on overall company EBIT for 2016 as compared to 2015.
EBIT as a Percentage of Revenue for Years 2017, 2016 and 2015
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
Clean Air |
7 | % | 7 | % | 7 | % | ||||||
Ride Performance |
3 | % | 6 | % | 4 | % | ||||||
Aftermarket |
14 | % | 15 | % | 14 | % | ||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. |
4 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % |
In Clean Air, EBIT as a percentage of revenues for 2017 was flat compared to 2016. The benefit from higher light vehicle and commercial truck, off-highway and other sales, new platforms and favorable currency impact was offset by higher restructuring and related expenses and the timing of contractual cost recovery of alloy surcharge increases.
In Ride Performance, EBIT as a percentage of revenues for 2017 was down three percentage points compared to 2016. The benefit from higher light vehicle and commercial truck, off-highway and other sales and new platforms was more than offset by higher restructuring and related expenses, the timing of steel recoveries, higher manufacturing costs, a $7 million warranty settlement with a customer, a $7 million goodwill impairment charge and unfavorable currency impact.
In Aftermarket, EBIT as a percentage of revenues for 2017 was down one percentage point compared to 2016 primarily due to lower volumes and a $4 million goodwill impairment charge, which more than offset favorable pricing and lower material costs.
In Clean Air, EBIT as a percentage of revenues for 2016 was flat compared to 2015. Higher light vehicle sales and new platforms, lower restructuring and related expenses and a $5 million benefit from the timing of a customer recovery were offset by lower commercial truck and off-highway vehicle revenue, higher manufacturing costs and higher SG&A and engineering expenses as well as unfavorable currency impact.
In Ride Performance, EBIT as a percentage of revenues was up two percentage points for 2016 compared to 2015. The benefit from higher light vehicle sales, new platforms, lower restructuring and related expenses and favorable currency impact was partially offset by lower commercial truck, off-highway and other vehicle revenue reflecting the sale of the Marzocchi specialty business and higher SG&A.
In Aftermarket, EBIT as a percentage of revenues was up one percentage for 2016 point compared to 2015. The impact of lower volumes and unfavorable currency was more than offset by favorable pricing, lower restructuring and related expenses and lower SG&A.
8
Interest Expense, Net of Interest Capitalized
We reported interest expense in 2017 of $73 million (substantially all in our U.S. operations) net of interest capitalized of $8 million, and $92 million (substantially all in our U.S. operations) net of interest capitalized of $6 million in 2016. Included in 2017 was $1 million of expense related to our refinancing activities. Included in 2016 was $24 million of expense related to our refinancing activities.
We reported interest expense in 2016 of $92 million (substantially all in our U.S. operations) net of interest capitalized of $6 million, and $67 million (substantially all in our U.S. operations) net of interest capitalized of $6 million in 2015. Included in 2016 was $24 million of expense related to our refinancing activities. Excluding the refinancing expenses, interest expense increased by $1 million in 2016 compared to 2015.
On December 31, 2017, we had $739 million in long-term debt obligations that have fixed interest rates. Of that amount, $500 million is fixed through July 2026, $225 million is fixed through December 2024 and the remainder is fixed through 2025. We also have $637 million in long-term debt obligations that are subject to variable interest rates. For more detailed explanations on our debt structure and senior credit facility refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources Capitalization later in this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Income Taxes
We reported income tax expense of $70 million in 2017. The tax expense recorded in 2017 included a provisional amount of $43 million for a one-time transition tax on deemed repatriation of previously deferred foreign earnings under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. This amount is subject to change as we refine our earnings and profits calculations and as additional guidance is published. The transition tax will result in cash tax payments of less than $1 million to U.S. state and local jurisdictions. Foreign tax credits will offset the U.S. federal portion of the transition tax. We remeasured U.S. deferred taxes from an applicable federal rate of 35% to the new statutory rate of 21% at which they are expected to be utilized, recording a $46 million provisional expense. The tax expense recorded in 2017 included a net tax benefit of $74 million relating to recognizing a U.S. tax benefit for foreign taxes. The Company will continue to refine its estimates throughout the measurement period provided for in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118, or until its accounting is complete. We reported income tax expense of less than $1 million in 2016. The tax expense recorded in 2016 included a net tax benefit of $110 million primarily relating to recognizing a U.S. tax benefit for foreign taxes. In 2016, we completed our detailed analysis of our ability to recognize and utilize foreign tax credits within the carryforward period. As a result, we amended our U.S. federal tax returns for the years 2006 to 2012 to claim foreign tax credits in lieu of deducting foreign taxes paid. The U.S. foreign tax credit law provides for a credit against U.S. taxes otherwise payable for foreign taxes with regard to dividends, interest and royalties paid to us in the U.S. Income tax expense also decreased in 2016 as a result of the mix of earnings in our various tax jurisdictions. We reported income tax expense of $146 million in 2015. The tax expense recorded in 2015 included a net tax benefit of $15 million primarily relating to prior year U.S. research and development tax credits, changes to uncertain tax positions, and prior year income tax adjustments.
Our uncertain tax position at December 31, 2017 and 2016 included exposures relating to the disallowance of deductions, global transfer pricing and various other issues. We believe it is reasonably possible that up to $8 million in unrecognized tax benefits related to the expiration of foreign statute of limitations and the conclusion of income tax examinations may be recognized within the next twelve months.
Our state net operating losses (NOLs) expire in various tax years through 2038. Our non-U.S. NOLs expire in various tax years through 2037, or have unlimited carryforward potential.
Restructuring and Other Charges
Over the past several years, we have adopted plans to restructure portions of our operations. These plans were approved by our Board of Directors and were designed to reduce operational and administrative overhead
9
costs throughout the business. In 2015, we incurred $63 million in restructuring and related costs including asset write-downs of $10 million, primarily related to European cost reduction efforts, exiting the Marzocchi suspension business, headcount reductions in Australia and South America, and the closure of a JIT plant in Australia, of which $46 million was recorded in cost of sales, $11 million in SG&A, $1 million in engineering expense, $1 million in other expense and $4 million in depreciation and amortization expense. In 2016, we incurred $36 million in restructuring and related costs including asset write-downs of $6 million, primarily related to manufacturing footprint improvements in North America Ride Performance, headcount reduction and cost improvement initiatives in Europe and China Clean Air, South America and Australia, of which $17 million was recorded in cost of sales, $12 million in SG&A, $1 million in engineering, $2 million in other expense and $4 million in depreciation and amortization expense. In 2017, we incurred $72 million in restructuring and related costs including asset write-downs of $3 million, primarily related to the planned closing a Clean Air Belgian JIT plant in response to the end of production on a customer platform, closing an OE Clean Air manufacturing plant and downsizing Ride Performance operations in Australia, the accelerated move of our Beijing Ride Performance plant and other cost improvement initiatives, of which $41 million was recorded in cost of sales, $28 million in SG&A and $3 million in depreciation and amortization expense.
Amounts related to activities that are part of our restructuring plans are as follows:
December 31,
2016 Restructuring Reserve |
2017
Expenses |
2017
Cash Payments |
Impact of
Exchange Rates |
December 31,
2017 Restructuring Reserve |
||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Employee Severance, Termination Benefits and Other Related Costs |
$ | 15 | 49 | (41 | ) | 2 | $ | 25 |
On January 31, 2013, we announced our intent to reduce structural costs in Europe by approximately $60 million annually. During the first quarter of 2016, we reached an annualized run rate on this cost reduction initiative of $49 million. With the disposition of the Gijon plant, which was completed at the end of the first quarter, the annualized rate essentially reached our target of $55 million at the current exchange rates at that time. In 2015, we incurred $63 million in restructuring and related costs, of which $22 million was related to this initiative. In 2016, we incurred $36 million in restructuring and related costs, of which $20 million was related to this initiative and certain ongoing matters. For example, we closed the Gijon plant in 2013, but subsequently re-opened it in July 2014 with about half of its prior workforce after the employees works council successfully filed suit challenging the closure decision. Pursuant to an agreement we entered into with employee representatives, we engaged in a sales process for the facility. In March of 2016, we signed an agreement to transfer ownership of the aftermarket shock absorber manufacturing facility in Gijon, Spain to German private equity fund Quantum Capital Partners A.G. (QCP). The transfer to QCP was effective March 31, 2016 and under a three year manufacturing agreement, QCP will also continue as a supplier to Tenneco.
On July 22, 2015, we announced our intention to discontinue our Marzocchi motorcycle fork suspension product line and our mountain bike suspension product line, and liquidate our Marzocchi operations. These actions were subject to a consultation process with the employee representatives and in total eliminated approximately 138 jobs. We employed 127 people at the Marzocchi plant in Bologna, Italy and an additional 11 people in our operations in North America and Taiwan. In November 2015, we closed on the sale of certain assets related to our Marzocchi mountain bike suspension product line to the affiliates of Fox Factory Holding Corp.; and in December 2015, we closed on the sale of the Marzocchi motorcycle fork product line to an Italian company, VRM S.p.A. These actions were a part of our ongoing efforts to optimize our Ride Performance product line globally while continuously improving our operations and increasing profitability. We recorded charges of $29 million in 2015 related to severance and other employee related costs, asset write-downs and other expenses related to the closure.
On June 29, 2017, we announced a restructuring initiative to close our Clean Air manufacturing plant in OSullivan Beach, Australia and downsize our Ride Performance plant in Clovelly Park, Australia when General
10
Motors and Toyota end vehicle production in the country, which occurred in October 2017. All such restructuring activities related to this initiative are expected to be completed by the first quarter of 2018. We recorded total charges related to this initiative of $21 million in 2017 including asset write-downs of $2 million. The charges included severance payments to employees, the cost of decommissioning equipment, a lease termination payment and other costs associated with this action. In 2017, we continued the relocation of production out of our Ride Performance plant in Beijing for which we incurred $6 million of restructuring and related costs. In the first quarter of 2017, we recognized a $10 million charge, including asset write-downs of $1 million, related to the planned closing of our Clean Air JIT plant in Ghent, Belgium due to the scheduled end of production on a customer platform in 2020. We incurred an additional $35 million in restructuring and related costs for cost improvement initiatives at various other operations around the world.
Under the terms of our amended and restated senior credit agreement that took effect on May 12, 2017, we are allowed to exclude, at our discretion, (i) up to $35 million in 2017 and $25 million each year thereafter of cash restructuring charges and related expenses, with the ability to carry forward any amount not used in one year to the next following year, and (ii) up to $150 million in the aggregate of all costs, expenses, fees, fines, penalties, judgments, legal settlements and other amounts associated with any restructuring, litigation, claim, proceeding or investigation related to or undertaken by us or any of our subsidiaries, together with any related provision for taxes, incurred in any period ending after May 12, 2017 in the calculation of the financial covenant ratios required under our senior credit facility. As of December 31, 2017, we elected not to exclude any of the $185 million of allowable cash charges and related expenses recognized in 2017 for restructuring related costs and antitrust settlement and against the $35 million annual limit for 2017 and the $150 million aggregate limit available under the terms of the senior credit facility.
Earnings Per Share
We reported net income attributable to Tenneco Inc. of $207 million or $3.91 per diluted common share for 2017. Included in 2017 were negative impacts from expenses related to our restructuring activities, charges related to pension derisking and the acceleration of restricted stock vesting, cost related to our refinancing activities, warranty settlement, antitrust settlement accrual, a goodwill impairment charge and tax adjustments from US tax reform, which was partially offset by a positive impact from the gain on sale of an unconsolidated JV and net tax benefits. The total impact of these items decreased earnings per diluted share by $2.98. We reported net income attributable to Tenneco Inc. of $356 million or $6.31 per diluted common share for 2016. Included in the results for 2016 were positive impacts from a net tax benefit associated with the recognition of a U.S. tax benefit for foreign taxes partially offset by negative impacts from expenses related to our restructuring activities, costs related to our refinancing activities and settlement charges related to pension buyout. The total impact of these items increased earnings per diluted share by $0.29. We reported net income attributable to Tenneco Inc. of $241 million or $4.01 per diluted common share for 2015. Included in the results for 2015 were negative impacts from expenses related to our restructuring activities and charges related to pension derisking, which were partially offset by net tax benefits. The total impact of these items decreased earnings per diluted share by $0.76.
Dividends on Common Stock
On February 1, 2017, Tenneco announced the reinstatement of a quarterly dividend program. We expect to pay a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share on our common stock, representing a planned annual dividend of $1.00 per share. In 2017, we paid dividends of $0.25 per share in each of the quarters, or $53 million in the aggregate. While we currently expect that comparable quarterly cash dividends will continue to be paid in the future, our dividend program and the payment of future cash dividends under the program are subject to continued capital availability, the judgment of our Board of Directors and our continued compliance with the provisions pertaining to the payment of dividends under our debt agreements. We did not pay any dividends in fiscal years 2016 or 2015.
11
Cash Flows for 2017 and 2016
Year Ended
December 31, |
||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||
Cash provided (used) by: |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 517 | $ | 374 | ||||
Investing activities |
(300 | ) | (229 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
(251 | ) | (86 | ) |
Operating Activities
For 2017, operating activities provided $517 million in cash compared to $374 million cash provided during 2016. For 2017, cash used by working capital was $17 million versus $236 million of cash used for working capital in 2016. Receivables were a use of cash of $81 million for 2017 compared to a use of cash of $325 million in 2016. Inventory represented a cash outflow of $96 million for 2017 and a cash outflow of $57 million during 2016. Accounts payable provided $129 million of cash for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $114 million of cash provided for the year ended December 31, 2016. The cash performance in 2017 also included $107 million from an accounts receivable factoring program established in the fourth quarter of the year. Cash taxes were $95 million for 2017 compared to $113 million in 2016.
Investing Activities
Cash used for investing activities was $71 million higher in 2017 compared to 2016. Cash payments for plant, property and equipment were $394 million in 2017 versus payments of $325 million in 2016, an increase of $69 million. Cash payments for software-related intangible assets were $25 million in 2017 compared to $20 million in 2016. Proceeds from the deferred purchase price of factored receivables were a source of cash of $112 million in 2017 compared to a source of cash of $110 million in 2016.
Financing Activities
Cash flow from financing activities was an outflow of $251 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to an outflow of $86 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. During 2017, we repurchased 2,936,950 shares of our outstanding common stock for $169 million at an average price of $57.57 per share. During 2016, we repurchased 4,182,613 shares of our outstanding common stock for $225 million at an average price of $53.89 per share. Since announcing our share repurchase program in 2015, we have repurchased a total of approximately 11.3 million shares for $607 million, representing 19 percent of the shares outstanding at that time. In February 2017, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to $400 million of common stock over the next three years. This amount includes the remaining $112 million amount authorized under earlier repurchase programs. As of December 31, 2017, we had $231 million remaining on the share repurchase authorization. In 2017, we paid a dividend of $0.25 per share in each quarter, or $53 million in the aggregate.
On May 12, 2017, we completed a refinancing of our senior credit facility by entering into an amendment and restatement of that facility. The amended and restated credit agreement enhances financial flexibility by increasing the size and extending the term of its revolving credit facility and term loan facility, and by adding Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. as a co-borrower under the revolver credit facility. The amended and restated credit agreement also adds foreign currency borrowing capability and permits the joinder of our foreign and domestic subsidiaries as borrowers under the revolving credit facility in the future. If any foreign subsidiary of ours is added to the revolving credit facility as a borrower, the obligations of such foreign borrower will be secured by the assets of such foreign borrower, and also will be secured by the assets of, and guaranteed by, the domestic borrowers and domestic guarantors as well as certain foreign subsidiaries of ours in the chain of ownership of such foreign borrower. The amended and restated credit facility consists of a $1,600 million
12
revolving credit facility and a $400 million term loan A facility, which replaced our former $1,200 million revolving credit facility and $264 million term loan A facility, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the senior credit facility provides us with a total revolving credit facility of $1,600 million and had a $390 million balance outstanding under the term loan A facility, both of which will mature on May 12, 2022. In 2016, refinancing activities included the issuance of $500 million of new 5 percent senior secured notes due 2026 to refinance our existing 6 7 /8 percent senior notes due 2020.
Borrowings under our revolving credit facility were $244 million at December 31, 2017 and $300 million at December 31, 2016. There was $30 million borrowed under the U.S. accounts receivable securitization programs at both the period ending December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Cash Flows for 2016 and 2015
Year Ended
December 31, |
||||||||
2016 | 2015 | |||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||
Cash provided (used) by: |
||||||||
Operating activities |
$ | 374 | $ | 415 | ||||
Investing activities |
(229 | ) | (192 | ) | ||||
Financing activities |
(86 | ) | (183 | ) |
Operating Activities
For 2016, operating activities provided $374 million in cash compared to $415 million cash provided during 2015. The lower cash from operations was primarily due to the timing of revenue growth at the end of the year and the resulting impact on accounts receivable. For 2016, cash used for working capital was $236 million versus $122 million of cash used for working capital in 2015. Receivables were a use of cash of $325 million for 2016 compared to a use of cash of $203 million in 2015. Inventory represented a cash outflow of $57 million for 2016 and a cash outflow of $36 million during 2015. Accounts payable provided $114 million of cash for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $90 million of cash provided for the year ended December 31, 2015. Cash taxes were $113 million for 2016 compared to $105 million in 2015, net of a US tax refund of $25 million for overpayment in 2014.
Investing Activities
Cash used for investing activities was $37 million higher in 2016 compared to 2015. Cash payments for plant, property and equipment were $325 million in 2016 versus payments of $286 million in 2015, an increase of $39 million. Cash payments for software-related intangible assets were $20 million in 2016 compared to $23 million in 2015. Proceeds from the deferred purchase price of factored receivables were a source of cash of $110 million in 2016 compared to a source of cash of $113 million in 2015.
Financing Activities
Cash flow from financing activities was an outflow of $86 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to an outflow of $183 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. During 2016, we repurchased 4,182,613 shares of our outstanding common stock for $225 million at an average price of $53.89 per share. During 2015, we repurchased 4,228,633 shares of our outstanding common stock for $213 million at an average price of $50.32 per share as part of the previously announced stock buyback plan of up to $350 million. Since announcing our share repurchase program in 2015, we have repurchased a total of approximately 8.4 million shares for $438 million, representing 14 percent of the shares outstanding at that time. On February 1, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.25, payable on March 23, 2017 to shareholders of record as of March 7, 2017. In addition, the Board authorized the repurchase of up to $400 million of common stock over the
13
next three years. This amount includes the remaining $112 million amount authorized under earlier repurchase programs. In 2016, refinancing activities included the issuance of $500 million of new 5 percent senior secured notes due 2026 to refinance our existing 6 7 /8 percent senior notes due 2020.
Borrowings under our revolving credit facility were $300 million at December 31, 2016 and $105 million at December 31, 2015. There was $30 million borrowed under the U.S. accounts receivable securitization programs at each of the periods ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Other Event
In the fourth quarter of 2017, we began to accelerate a required move of our Beijing Ride Performance plant outside the Beijing area. We anticipate this move out of our Beijing plant will be complete by the end of 2018. As we move production to existing and future sites, we expect to carry higher inventory levels to protect customer deliveries, and we will incur some additional costs in connection with these moves.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Capitalization
Year Ended
December 31, |
% Change | |||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||
Short-term debt and maturities classified as current |
$ | 83 | $ | 90 | (8 | )% | ||||||
Long-term debt |
1,358 | 1,294 | 5 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total debt |
1,441 | 1,384 | 4 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total redeemable noncontrolling interests |
42 | 40 | 5 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total noncontrolling interests |
46 | 47 | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Tenneco Inc. shareholders equity |
696 | 573 | 21 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total equity |
742 | 620 | 20 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 2,225 | $ | 2,044 | 9 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
General. Short-term debt, which includes maturities classified as current, borrowings by parent company and foreign subsidiaries, and borrowings under our North American accounts receivable securitization program, were $83 million and $90 million as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Borrowings under our revolving credit facilities, which are classified as long-term debt, were $244 million and $300 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
The 2017 year-to-date increase in Tenneco Inc. shareholders equity primarily resulted from net income attributable to Tenneco Inc. of $207 million, a $14 million increase in premium on common stock and other capital surplus relating to common stock issued pursuant to benefit plans, a $27 million increase related to pension and postretirement benefits and a $97 million increase caused by the impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on the translation of financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars, partially offset by a $169 million increase in treasury stock as a result of purchases of common stock under our share purchase program and cash dividend payments of $53 million.
Overview. Our financing arrangements are primarily provided by a committed senior secured financing arrangement with a syndicate of banks and other financial institutions. The arrangement is secured by substantially all our domestic assets and pledges of up to 66 percent of the stock of certain first-tier foreign subsidiaries, as well as guarantees by our material domestic subsidiaries.
14
On June 6, 2016, we announced a cash tender offer to purchase our outstanding $500 million 6 7 /8 percent senior notes due in 2020. We received tenders representing $325 million aggregate principal amount of the notes and, on June 13, 2016, we purchased the tendered notes at a price of 103.81 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. On July 13, 2016, we redeemed the remaining outstanding $175 million aggregate principal amount of the notes that were not purchased pursuant to the tender offer at a price of 103.438 percent of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We used the proceeds of the issuance of our 5 percent senior notes due 2026 to fund the purchase and redemption. The senior credit facility was used to fund the fees and expenses of the tender offer and redemption.
We recorded $16 million and $8 million of pre-tax interest charges in June and July of 2016, respectively, related to the repurchase and redemption of our 6 7 /8 percent senior notes due in 2020 and the write-off of deferred debt issuance costs relating to those notes.
On May 12, 2017, we completed a refinancing of our senior credit facility by entering into an amendment and restatement of that facility. The amended and restated credit agreement enhances financial flexibility by increasing the size and extending the term of its revolving credit facility and term loan facility, and by adding Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. as a co-borrower under the revolving credit facility. The amended and restated credit agreement also adds foreign currency borrowing capability and permits the joinder of our foreign and domestic subsidiaries as borrowers under the revolving credit facility in the future. If any foreign subsidiary of Tenneco is added to the revolving credit facility as a borrower, the obligations of such foreign borrower will be secured by the assets of such foreign borrower, and also will be secured by the assets of, and guaranteed by, the domestic borrowers and domestic guarantors as well as certain foreign subsidiaries of Tenneco in the chain of ownership of such foreign borrower. The amended and restated credit facility consists of a $1,600 million revolving credit facility and a $400 million term loan A facility, which replaced our former $1,200 million revolving credit facility and $264 million term loan A facility, respectively. As of December 31, 2017, the senior credit facility provides us with a total revolving credit facility of $1,600 million and had a $390 million balance outstanding under the term loan A facility, both of which will mature on May 12, 2022. Net carrying amount for the balance outstanding under the term loan A facility including a $2 million debt issuance cost was $388 million as of December 31, 2017. Funds may be borrowed, repaid and re-borrowed under the revolving credit facility without premium or penalty (subject to any customary LIBOR breakage fees). The revolving credit facility is reflected as debt on our balance sheet only if we borrow money under this facility or if we use the facility to make payments for letters of credit. Outstanding letters of credit reduce our availability to borrow revolving loans under the facility. We are required to make quarterly principal payments under the term loan A facility of $5 million through June 30, 2019, $7.5 million beginning September 30, 2019 through June 30, 2020, $10 million beginning September 30, 2020 through March 31, 2022 and a final payment of $260 million is due on May 12, 2022. We have excluded the required payments, within the next twelve months, under the term loan A facility totaling $20 million from current liabilities as of December 31, 2017, because we have the intent and ability to refinance the obligations on a long-term basis by using our revolving credit facility.
We recorded $1 million of pre-tax interest charges in May 2017 related to amendment and restatement of the senior credit facility and the write off of deferred debt issuance costs related to the senior credit facility.
At December 31, 2017, of the $1,600 million available under the revolving credit facility, we had unused borrowing capacity of $1,356 million with $244 million in outstanding borrowings and zero in outstanding letters of credit. As of December 31, 2017, our outstanding debt also included (i) $390 million of a term loan which consisted of a $388 million net carrying amount including a $2 million debt issuance cost related to our term loan A facility which is subject to quarterly principal payments as described above through May 12, 2022, (ii) $225 million of notes which consisted of a $222 million net carrying amount including a $3 million debt issuance cost of 5 3 / 8 percent senior notes due December 15, 2024, (iii) $500 million of notes which consisted of a $492 million net carrying amount including a $8 million debt issuance cost of 5 percent senior notes due July 15, 2026, and (iv) $95 million of other debt.
15
We monitor market conditions with respect to the potential refinancing of our outstanding debt obligations, including our senior secured credit facility and senior notes. Depending on market and other conditions, we may seek to refinance our debt obligations from time to time. We cannot make any assurance, however, that any refinancing will be completed.
Senior Credit Facility Interest Rates and Fees. Beginning May 12, 2017, our term loan A facility and revolving credit facility bear interest at an annual rate equal to, at our option, either (i) London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin of 175 basis points, or (ii) a rate consisting of the greater of (a) the JPMorgan Chase prime rate plus a margin of 75 basis points, (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points plus a margin of 75 basis points, and (c) one month LIBOR plus 100 basis points plus a margin of 75 basis points. The margin we pay on these borrowings will be increased by a total of 25 basis points above the original margin following each fiscal quarter for which our consolidated net leverage ratio is equal to or greater than 2.5. In addition, the margin we pay on these borrowings will be reduced by a total of 25 basis points below the original margin if our consolidated net leverage ratio is less than 1.5. We also pay a commitment fee equal to 25 basis points that will be reduced to 20 basis points or increased to up to 30 basis points depending on consolidated net leverage ratio changes as set forth in the senior credit facility.
Senior Credit Facility Other Terms and Conditions. Our senior credit facility requires that we maintain financial ratios equal to or better than the following consolidated net leverage ratio (consolidated indebtedness plus, without duplication, the domestic receivable program amount, net of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents up to $250 million, divided by consolidated EBITDA, each as defined in the senior credit facility agreement), and consolidated interest coverage ratio (consolidated EBITDA divided by consolidated interest expense, as defined in the senior credit facility agreement) at the end of each period indicated. Failure to maintain these ratios will result in a default under our senior credit facility. The financial ratios required under the senior credit facility and the actual ratios we calculated for the four quarters of 2017, are as follows:
Quarter Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31,
2017 |
September 30,
2017 |
June 30,
2017 |
March 31,
2017 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Req. | Act. | Req. | Act. | Req. | Act. | Req. | Act. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage Ratio (maximum) |
3.50 | 1.95 | 3.50 | 2.15 | 3.50 | 1.97 | 3.50 | 1.62 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Coverage Ratio (minimum) |
2.75 | 10.77 | 2.75 | 11.48 | 2.75 | 12.44 | 2.75 | 15.38 |
The senior credit facility includes a maximum leverage ratio covenant of 3.50 and a minimum interest coverage ratio of 2.75, in each case through May 12, 2022. The senior credit facility provides us with the flexibility not to exclude certain otherwise excludable charges incurred in any relevant period from the calculation of the leverage and interest coverage ratios for such period. As of December 31, 2017, we elected not to exclude a total of $185 million of excludable charges. Had these charges been excluded, the leverage ratio and the interest ratio would have been 1.52 and 13.76, respectively, as of December 31, 2017.
The covenants in our senior credit facility agreement generally prohibit us from repaying or refinancing our senior notes. So long as no default existed, we would, however, under our senior credit facility agreement, be permitted to repay or refinance our senior notes (i) with the net cash proceeds of permitted refinancing indebtedness (as defined in the senior credit facility agreement) or with the net cash proceeds of our common stock, in each case issued within 180 days prior to such repayment; (ii) with the net cash proceeds of the incremental facilities (as defined in the senior credit facility agreement) and certain indebtedness incurred by our foreign subsidiaries; (iii) with the proceeds of the revolving loans (as defined in the senior credit facility agreement); (iv) with the cash generated by our operations; (v) in an amount equal to the net cash proceeds of qualified capital stock (as defined in the senior credit facility agreement) issued by us after May 12, 2017; and (vi) in exchange for permitted refinancing indebtedness or in exchange for shares of our common stock; provided
16
that such purchases are capped as follows (with respect to clauses (iii), (iv) and (v) based on a pro forma consolidated leverage ratio after giving effect to such purchase, cancellation or redemption):
Pro forma Consolidated Leverage Ratio |
Aggregate Senior
Note Maximum Amount |
|||
(Millions) | ||||
Greater than or equal to 3.25x |
$ | 20 | ||
Greater than or equal to 3.0x |
$ | 100 | ||
Greater than or equal to 2.5x |
$ | 225 | ||
Less than 2.5x |
no limit |
Although the senior credit facility agreement would permit us to repay or refinance our senior notes under the conditions described above, any repayment or refinancing of our outstanding notes would be subject to market conditions and either the voluntary participation of note holders or our ability to redeem the notes under the terms of the applicable note indenture. For example, while the senior credit facility agreement would allow us to repay our outstanding notes via a direct exchange of the notes for either permitted refinancing indebtedness or for shares of our common stock, we do not, under the terms of the agreements governing our outstanding notes, have the right to refinance the notes via any type of direct exchange.
The senior credit facility agreement also contains other restrictions on our operations that are customary for similar facilities, including limitations on: (i) incurring additional liens; (ii) sale and leaseback transactions (except for the permitted transactions as described in the senior credit facility agreement); (iii) liquidations and dissolutions; (iv) incurring additional indebtedness or guarantees; (v) investments and acquisitions; (vi) dividends and share repurchases; (vii) mergers and consolidations; (viii) disposition of assets; and (ix) refinancing of the senior notes. Compliance with these requirements and restrictions is a condition for any incremental borrowings under the senior credit facility agreement and failure to meet these requirements enables the lenders to require repayment of any outstanding loans.
As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with all the financial covenants and operational restrictions of the senior credit facility. Our senior credit facility does not contain any terms that could accelerate payment of the facility or affect pricing under the facility as a result of a credit rating agency downgrade.
Senior Notes. As of December 31, 2017, our outstanding senior notes also included $225 million of 5 3 / 8 percent senior notes due December 15, 2024 which consisted of $222 million net carrying amount including a $3 million debt issuance cost and $500 million of 5 percent senior notes due July 15, 2026 which consisted of $492 million net carrying amount including a $8 million debt issuance cost. Under the indentures governing the notes, we are permitted to redeem some or all of the remaining senior notes at specified prices that decline to par over a specified period, (a) on or after July 15, 2021, in the case of the senior notes due 2026, and (b) on or after December 15, 2019, in the case of the senior notes due 2024. In addition, the notes may also be redeemed in whole or in part at a redemption price generally equal to 100 percent of the principal amount thereof plus a premium based on the present values of the remaining payments due to the note holders. Further, the indentures governing the notes also permit us to redeem up to 35 percent of the senior notes with the proceeds of certain equity offerings, (a) on or before July 15, 2019 at a redemption price equal to 105 percent, in the case of the senior notes due 2026 and (b) on or before December 15, 2017 at a redemption price equal to 105.375 percent, in the case of the senior notes due 2024. If we sell certain of our assets or experience specified kinds of changes in control, we must offer to repurchase the notes due 2026 and 2024 at 101 percent of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Our senior notes due December 15, 2024 and July 15, 2026, respectively, contain covenants that will, among other things, limit our ability to create liens and enter into sale and leaseback transactions. Our senior notes due 2024 also require that, as a condition precedent to incurring certain types of indebtedness not otherwise permitted, our consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, as calculated on a pro forma basis, be greater than 2.00,
17
as well as containing restrictions on our operations, including limitations on: (i) incurring additional indebtedness; (ii) dividends; (iii) distributions and stock repurchases; (iv) investments; (v) asset sales and (vi) mergers and consolidations. Subject to limited exceptions, all of our existing and future material domestic wholly owned subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guarantee our senior notes on a joint and several basis. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of the subsidiaries that have guaranteed these notes to make distributions to us. As of December 31, 2017, we were in compliance with the covenants and restrictions of these indentures.
Accounts Receivable Securitization/Factoring. We securitize or factor some of our accounts receivable on a limited recourse basis in the U.S. and Europe. As servicer under these accounts receivable securitization and factoring programs, we are responsible for performing all accounts receivable administration functions for these securitized and factored financial assets including collections and processing of customer invoice adjustments. In the U.S., we have an accounts receivable securitization program with three commercial banks comprised of a first priority facility and a second priority facility. We securitize original equipment and aftermarket receivables on a daily basis under this program. In April 2017, this U.S. program was amended and extended to April 30, 2019. The first priority facility now provides financing of up to $155 million and the second priority facility, which is subordinated to the first priority facility, now provides up to an additional $25 million of financing. Both facilities monetize accounts receivable generated in the U.S. and Canada that meet certain eligibility requirements, and the second priority facility also monetizes certain accounts receivable generated in the U.S. and Canada that would otherwise be ineligible under the first priority securitization facility. The amount of outstanding third-party investments in our securitized accounts receivable under this U.S. program was $30 million, recorded in short-term debt, at both December 31, 2017 and 2016.
Each facility contains customary covenants for financings of this type, including restrictions related to liens, payments, mergers or consolidations and amendments to the agreements underlying the receivables pool. Further, each facility may be terminated upon the occurrence of customary events (with customary grace periods, if applicable), including breaches of covenants, failure to maintain certain financial ratios, inaccuracies of representations and warranties, bankruptcy and insolvency events, certain changes in the rate of default or delinquency of the receivables, a change of control and the entry or other enforcement of material judgments. In addition, each facility contains cross-default provisions, where the facility could be terminated in the event of non-payment of other material indebtedness when due and any other event which permits the acceleration of the maturity of material indebtedness.
On December 14, 2017 we entered into a new accounts receivable factoring program in the U.S. with a commercial bank. Under this program we sell receivables from one of our U.S. OE customers at a rate that is favorable versus our senior credit facility. This arrangement is uncommitted and provides for cancellation by the commercial bank with no less than 30 days prior written notice. The amount of outstanding third-party investments in our accounts receivable sold under this program was $107 million at December 31, 2017.
We also factor receivables in our European operations with regional banks in Europe under various separate facilities. The commitments for these arrangements are generally for one year, but some may be canceled with notice 90 days prior to renewal. In some instances, the arrangement provides for cancellation by the applicable financial institution at any time upon notification. The amount of outstanding third-party investments in our accounts receivable sold under programs in Europe was $218 million and $160 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Certain programs in Europe have deferred purchase price arrangements with the banks. We received cash of $112 million, $110 million and $113 million to settle the deferred purchase price for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
If we were not able to securitize or factor receivables under either the U.S. or European programs, our borrowings under our revolving credit agreement might increase. These accounts receivable securitization and factoring programs provide us with access to cash at costs that are generally favorable to alternative sources of financing, and allow us to reduce borrowings under our revolving credit agreement.
In our U.S. accounts receivable securitization programs, we transfer a partial interest in a pool of receivables and the interest that we retain is subordinate to the transferred interest. Accordingly, we account for our U.S.
18
securitization program as a secured borrowing. In our U.S. and European accounts receivable factoring programs, we transfer accounts receivables in their entirety to the acquiring entities and satisfy all of the conditions established under ASC Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing, to report the transfer of financial assets in their entirety as a sale. The fair value of assets received as proceeds in exchange for the transfer of accounts receivable under our U.S and European factoring programs approximates the fair value of such receivables. We recognized $4 million in interest expense for the year ended 2017, $3 million in interest expense for the year ended 2016 and $2 million in interest expense for the year ended 2015, relating to our U.S. securitization program. In addition, we recognized a loss of $3 million for each of the years ended 2017, 2016 and 2015, on the sale of trade accounts receivable in our U.S. and European accounts receivable factoring programs, representing the discount from book values at which these receivables were sold to our banks. The discount rate varies based on funding costs incurred by our banks, which averaged approximately one percent for the year ended 2017 and two percent for both years ended 2016 and 2015.
Financial Instruments. In certain instances, several of our Chinese subsidiaries receive payment from customers through the receipt of financial instruments on the date the customer payments are due. Several of our Chinese subsidiaries also satisfy vendor payments through the delivery of financial instruments on the date the payments are due. Financial instruments issued to satisfy vendor payables and not redeemed totaled $11 million and $12 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, and were classified as notes payable. Financial instruments received from OE customers and not redeemed totaled $10 million and $5 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. We classify financial instruments received from our customers as other current assets if issued by a financial institution of our customers or as customer notes and accounts if issued by our customer. We classified $10 million and $5 million in other current assets at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.
The financial instruments received by some of our Chinese subsidiaries are drafts drawn that are payable at a future date and, in some cases, are negotiable and/or are guaranteed by banks of the customers. The use of these instruments for payment follows local commercial practice. Because certain of such financial instruments are guaranteed by our customers banks, we believe they represent a lower financial risk than the outstanding accounts receivable that they satisfy which are not guaranteed by a bank.
Supply Chain Financing. Certain of our suppliers participate in supply chain financing programs under which they securitize their accounts receivables from Tenneco. Financial institutions participate in the supply chain financing program on an uncommitted basis and can cease purchasing receivables or drafts from Tennecos suppliers at any time. If the financial institutions did not continue to purchase receivables or drafts from Tennecos suppliers under these programs, the participating vendors may have a need to renegotiate their payment terms with Tenneco which in turn could cause our borrowings under our revolving credit facility to increase.
Capital Requirements. We believe that cash flows from operations, combined with our cash on hand, subject to any applicable withholding taxes upon repatriation of cash balances from our foreign operations where most of our cash balances are located, and available borrowing capacity described above, assuming that we maintain compliance with the financial covenants and other requirements of our senior credit facility agreement, will be sufficient to meet our future capital requirements, including debt amortization, capital expenditures, pension contributions, and other operational requirements, for the following year. Our ability to meet the financial covenants depends upon a number of operational and economic factors, many of which are beyond our control. In the event that we are unable to meet these financial covenants, we would consider several options to meet our cash flow needs. Such actions include additional restructuring initiatives and other cost reductions, sales of assets, reductions to working capital and capital spending, reduction or cessation of our share repurchase and dividend programs, issuance of equity and other alternatives to enhance our financial and operating position. Should we be required to implement any of these actions to meet our cash flow needs, we believe we can do so in a reasonable time frame.
19
Contractual Obligations.
Our remaining required debt principal amortization and payment obligations under lease and certain other financial commitments as of December 31, 2017 are shown in the following table:
Payments due in: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
Beyond
2022 |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revolver borrowings |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 244 | $ | | $ | 244 | ||||||||||||||
Senior term loans |
20 | 25 | 35 | 40 | 270 | | 390 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Senior notes |
| | | | | 725 | 725 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other long term debt (including maturities classified as current) |
2 | 3 | | | | | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other subsidiary debt and capital lease obligations |
1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term debt |
80 | | | | | | 80 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Debt and capital lease obligations |
103 | 31 | 36 | 41 | 515 | 728 | 1,454 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
46 | 36 | 30 | 23 | 18 | 25 | 178 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations(a) |
191 | 79 | | | | | 270 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest payments |
45 | 60 | 63 | 52 | 209 | 124 | 553 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital commitments |
149 | | | | | | 149 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total payments |
$ | 534 | $ | 206 | $ | 129 | $ | 116 | $ | 742 | $ | 877 | $ | 2,604 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Short-term, ordinary course payment obligations have been excluded. |
If we do not maintain compliance with the terms of our senior credit facility or senior notes indentures described above, all amounts under those arrangements could, automatically or at the option of the lenders or other debt holders, become due. Additionally, each of those facilities contains provisions that certain events of default under one facility will constitute a default under the other facility, allowing the acceleration of all amounts due. We currently expect to maintain compliance with the terms of all of our various credit agreements for the foreseeable future.
Included in our contractual obligations is the amount of interest to be paid on our long-term debt. As our debt structure contains both fixed and variable rate obligations, we have made assumptions in calculating the amount of future interest payments. Interest on our senior notes is calculated using the fixed rates of 5 3 /8 percent and 5 percent, respectively. Interest on our variable rate debt is calculated as LIBOR plus the applicable margin in effect at December 31, 2017 for the Eurodollar and Term Loan A loan and prime plus the applicable margin in effect on December 31, 2017 on the prime-based loans. We have assumed that both LIBOR and the prime rate will remain unchanged for the outlying years. See Capitalization.
We have also included an estimate of expenditures required after December 31, 2017 to complete the projects authorized at December 31, 2017, in which we have made substantial commitments in connection with purchasing plant, property and equipment for our operations. For 2018, we expect our capital expenditures to be between $380 million and $410 million.
We have included an estimate of the expenditures necessary after December 31, 2017 to satisfy purchase requirements pursuant to certain ordinary course supply agreements that we have entered into. With respect to our other supply agreements, they generally do not specify the volumes we are required to purchase. In many cases, if any commitment is provided, the agreements state only the minimum percentage of our purchase requirements we must buy from the supplier. As a result, these purchase obligations fluctuate from year-to-year and we are not able to quantify the amount of our future obligations.
20
We have not included material cash requirements for unrecognized tax benefits or taxes. It is difficult to estimate taxes to be paid as changes in where we generate income can have a significant impact on future tax payments. We have also not included cash requirements for funding pension and postretirement benefit costs. Based upon current estimates, we believe we will be required to make contributions of approximately $15 million to those plans in 2018. Pension and postretirement contributions beyond 2018 will be required but those amounts will vary based upon many factors, including the performance of our pension fund investments during 2018 and future discount rate changes. For additional information relating to the funding of our pension and other postretirement plans, refer to Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements. In addition, we have not included cash requirements for environmental remediation. Based upon current estimates we believe we will be required to spend approximately $17 million over the next 30 years. However, due to possible modifications in remediation processes and other factors, it is difficult to determine the actual timing of the payments. See Environmental and Other Matters.
We occasionally provide guarantees that could require us to make future payments in the event that the third party primary obligor does not make its required payments. We are not required to record a liability for any of these guarantees.
Additionally, we have from time to time issued guarantees for the performance of obligations by some of our subsidiaries, and some of our subsidiaries have guaranteed our debt. All of our existing and future material domestic subsidiaries fully and unconditionally guarantee our senior credit facility and our senior notes on a joint and several basis. The senior credit facility is also secured by first-priority liens on substantially all our domestic assets and pledges of up to 66 percent of the stock of certain first-tier foreign subsidiaries. No assets or capital stock secure our senior notes. You should also read Note 13 of the consolidated financial statements of Tenneco Inc., where we present the Supplemental Guarantor Consolidating Financial Statements.
We have two performance guarantee agreements in the U.K. between Tenneco Management (Europe) Limited (TMEL) and the two Walker Group Retirement Plans, the Walker Group Employee Benefit Plan and the Walker Group Executive Retirement Benefit Plan (the Walker Plans), whereby TMEL will guarantee the payment of all current and future pension contributions in the event of a payment default by the sponsoring or participating employers of the Walker Plans. The Walker Plans are comprised of employees from Tenneco Walker (U.K.) Limited and Futaba (U.K.) Limited, formerly our Futaba-Tenneco (U.K.) joint venture. Employer contributions are funded by Tenneco Walker (U.K.) Limited, as the sponsoring employer, and were also funded by Futaba (U.K.) Limited prior to its ceasing, on April 28, 2017, to be an entity in which Tenneco has an equity interest. The performance guarantee agreements are expected to remain in effect until all pension obligations for the Walker Plans sponsoring and participating employers have been satisfied. We did not record an additional liability for this performance guarantee since Tenneco Walker (U.K.) Limited, as the sponsoring employer of the Walker Plans, already recognizes 100 percent of the pension obligation calculated based on U.S. GAAP, for all of the Walker Plans participating employers on its balance sheet, which was zero and $19 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. At December 31, 2017, all pension contributions under the Walker Plans were current for all of the Walker Plans sponsoring and participating employers.
In June 2011, we entered into an indemnity agreement between TMEL and Futaba Industrial Co. Ltd. (Futaba) which required Futaba to indemnify TMEL for any cost, loss or liability which TMEL may have incurred under the performance guarantee agreements relating to the Futaba-Tenneco U.K. joint venture. The maximum amount reimbursable by Futaba to TMEL under this indemnity agreement was equal to the amount incurred by TMEL under the performance guarantee agreements multiplied by Futabas shareholder ownership percentage of the Futaba-Tenneco U.K. joint venture. On April 28, 2017, Walker Limited sold its equity interest in the Futaba-Tenneco U.K. joint venture entity to Futaba Industrial Co., Ltd. In connection with the closing of that transaction, this indemnity agreement was terminated and accordingly Futaba no longer has any reimbursement obligations thereunder.
We have issued guarantees through letters of credit in connection with some obligations of our affiliates. As of December 31, 2017, we have $32 million in letters of credit to support some of our subsidiaries insurance
21
arrangements, foreign employee benefit programs, environmental remediation activities and cash management and capital requirements.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The following paragraphs include a discussion of some critical areas where estimates are required.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue for sales to our original equipment and aftermarket customers when title and risk of loss passes to the customers under the terms of our arrangements with those customers, which is usually at the time of shipment from our plants or distribution centers. Generally, in connection with the sale of exhaust systems to certain original equipment manufacturers, we purchase catalytic converters and diesel particulate filters or components thereof including precious metals (substrates) on behalf of our customers which are used in the assembled system. These substrates are included in our inventory and passed through to the customer at our cost, plus a small margin, since we take title to the inventory and are responsible for both the delivery and quality of the finished product. Revenues recognized for substrate sales were $2,187 million, $2,028 million and $1,888 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. For our aftermarket customers, we provide for promotional incentives and returns at the time of sale. Estimates are based upon the terms of the incentives and historical experience with returns. Certain taxes assessed by governmental authorities on revenue producing transactions, such as value added taxes, are excluded from revenue and recorded on a net basis. Shipping and handling costs billed to customers are included in revenues and the related costs are included in cost of sales in our Statements of Income.
Warranty Reserves
Where we have offered product warranty, we also provide for warranty costs. Provisions for estimated expenses related to product warranty are made at the time products are sold or when specific warranty issues are identified on OE products. These estimates are established using historical information about the nature, frequency, and average cost of warranty claims and upon specific warranty issues as they arise. The warranty terms vary but range from one year up to limited lifetime warranties on some of our premium aftermarket products. We actively study trends of our warranty claims and take action to improve product quality and minimize warranty claims. While we have not experienced any material differences between these estimates and our actual costs, it is reasonably possible that future warranty issues could arise that could have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Engineering, Research and Development
We expense engineering, research, and development costs as they are incurred. Engineering, research, and development expenses were $158 million for 2017, $154 million for 2016 and $146 million for 2015, net of reimbursements from our customers. Of these amounts, $21 million in 2017, $15 million in 2016 and $17 million in 2015 relate to research and development, which includes the research, design, and development of a new unproven product or process. Additionally, $128 million for both 2017 and 2016 and $111 million for 2015 of engineering, research, and development expense relates to engineering costs we incurred for application of existing products and processes to vehicle platforms. The remainder of the expenses in each year relate to improvements and enhancements to existing products and processes. Further, our customers reimburse us for engineering, research, and development costs on some platforms when we prepare prototypes and incur costs
22
before platform awards. Our engineering, research, and development expense for 2017, 2016 and 2015 has been reduced by $164 million, $137 million and $145 million, respectively, for these reimbursements.
Pre-production Design and Development and Tooling Assets
We expense pre-production design and development costs as incurred unless we have a contractual guarantee for reimbursement from the original equipment customer. Unbilled pre-production design and development costs recorded in prepayments and other and long-term receivables totaled $25 million and $22 million on December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In addition, plant, property and equipment included $72 million and $62 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for original equipment tools and dies that we own, and prepayments and other included $117 million and $97 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for in-process tools and dies that we are building for our original equipment customers.
Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities on the basis of the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences that exist between the financial statement carrying value of assets and liabilities and their respective tax values, and net operating losses (NOL) and tax credit carryforwards on a taxing jurisdiction basis. We measure deferred tax assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will apply in the years in which we expect the temporary differences to be recovered or paid.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was enacted into U.S. law, which, among other provisions, lowered the corporate income tax rate effective January 1, 2018 from the currently applicable 35% rate to a new 21% rate, and implemented significant changes with respect to U.S. tax treatment of earnings originating from outside the U.S. Many of the provisions of TCJA are subject to regulatory interpretation and U.S. state conforming enactment. We have included in these financial statements provisional estimates for the deemed repatriation transition tax impact contained within TCJA and provisional measurements for effective rate changes to deferred tax assets and liabilities, including any valuation allowances thereon, as disclosed in the Tax Footnotes. The Company will continue to refine its estimates throughout the measurement period provided for in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 118, or until its accounting is complete. The TCJA also includes an anti-deferral provision (the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income tax) effective starting in 2018 wherein taxes on foreign income are imposed in excess of a deemed return on tangible assets of non-U.S. corporations. Because of the complexities of the provisions, the Company is continuing to evaluate the elective treatment under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles as either a period income tax expense or as a component of deferred taxes.
We evaluate our deferred income tax assets quarterly to determine if valuation allowances are required or should be adjusted. U.S. GAAP requires that companies assess whether valuation allowances should be established against their deferred tax assets based on consideration of all available evidence, both positive and negative, using a more likely than not standard. This assessment considers, among other matters, the nature, frequency and amount of recent losses, the duration of statutory carryforward periods, and tax planning strategies. In making such judgments, significant weight is given to evidence that can be objectively verified.
Valuation allowances are established for deferred tax assets based on a more likely than not threshold. The ability to realize deferred tax assets depends on our ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carryforward periods provided for in the tax law for each tax jurisdiction. We consider the following possible sources of taxable income when assessing the realization of our deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance:
|
Future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences; |
|
Taxable income or loss, based on recent results, exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards; |
23
|
Tax-planning strategies; and |
|
Taxable income in prior carryback years if carryback is permitted under the relevant tax law. |
The valuation allowances recorded against deferred tax assets in certain foreign jurisdictions will impact our provision for income taxes until the valuation allowances are released. Our provision for income taxes will include no tax benefit for losses incurred and no tax expense with respect to income generated in these jurisdictions until the respective valuation allowance is eliminated.
Goodwill, net
We evaluate goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if events indicate it is warranted.
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update 2017-04, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. To address concerns over the cost and complexity of the two-step goodwill impairment test, the new standard removes the second step of the test. An entity will apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting units carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. A public business entity should adopt the amendments in this update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment test performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We adopted this standard for the first quarter of 2017.
We compare the estimated fair value of our reporting units with goodwill to the carrying value of the units assets and liabilities to determine if impairment exists within the recorded balance of goodwill. We estimate the fair value of each reporting unit using the income approach which is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The income approach is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of market trends, forecasted revenues and expenses, capital expenditures, weighted average cost of capital and other variables. A separate discount rate derived by a combination of published sources, internal estimates and weighted based on our debt to equity ratio, was used to calculate the discounted cash flows for each of our reporting units. These estimates are based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and outside of the control of management. If the carrying value of our reporting units exceeds their current fair value as determined based on discounted future cash flows of the related business, the goodwill is considered impaired. As a result, a goodwill impairment loss would be measured at the amount by which a reporting units carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.
As a result of our goodwill impairment evaluation in the fourth quarter of 2017, we determined that the estimated fair value of the Europe and South America Ride Performance reporting unit was lower than its carrying value. Accordingly, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $11 million in the fourth quarter. We reached this determination based on updated long-term projections for the Europe and South America Ride Performance reporting unit provided by the Companys annual budgeting and strategic planning process, which is completed in the fourth quarter. The 2017 annual budgeting and strategic planning process indicated that the reporting units recovery period will be longer than previously expected. In the fourth quarter of 2017, the estimated fair value of our other reporting units substantially exceeded the carrying value of their assets and liabilities as of the testing date for goodwill impairment.
At December 31, 2017, accumulated goodwill impairment charges include $306 million related to our North America Ride Performance reporting unit, $43 million related to our Europe, South America & India Ride Performance reporting unit and $11 million related to our Asia Pacific Ride Performance reporting unit.
In the fourth quarter of 2016 and 2015, the estimated fair value of each of our reporting units exceeded the carrying value of their assets and liabilities as of the testing date for goodwill impairment.
24
Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
We have various defined benefit pension plans that cover some of our employees. We also have postretirement health care and life insurance plans that cover some of our U.S. and Canadian employees. Our pension and postretirement health care and life insurance expenses and valuations are dependent on assumptions used by our actuaries in calculating those amounts. These assumptions include discount rates, health care cost trend rates, long-term return on plan assets, retirement rates, mortality rates and other factors. Health care cost trend rate assumptions are developed based on historical cost data and an assessment of likely long-term trends. Retirement rates are based primarily on actual plan experience while mortality rates are based upon the general population experience which is not expected to differ materially from our experience.
Our approach to establishing the discount rate assumption for both our domestic and foreign plans is generally based on the yield on high-quality corporate fixed-income investments. At the end of each year, the discount rate is determined using the results of bond yield curve models based on a portfolio of high quality bonds matching the notional cash inflows with the expected benefit payments for each significant benefit plan. Based on this approach, we lowered the weighted average discount rate for all our pension plans to 3.0 percent in 2017 from 3.3 percent in 2016. The discount rate for postretirement benefits was lowered to 3.8 percent in 2017 from 4.2 percent in 2016.
Our approach to determining expected return on plan asset assumptions evaluates both historical returns as well as estimates of future returns, and is adjusted for any expected changes in the long-term outlook for the equity and fixed income markets and for changes in the composition of pension plan assets. As a result, our estimate of the weighted average long-term rate of return on plan assets for all of our pension plans was lowered to 5.5 percent in 2017 from 6.1 percent in 2016.
Our pension plans generally do not require employee contributions. Our policy is to fund our pension plans in accordance with applicable U.S. and foreign government regulations. At December 31, 2017, all legal funding requirements had been met.
Refer to Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements for more information regarding our pension and other postretirement employee benefit costs and assumptions.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements located in Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplemental Data is incorporated herein by reference.
Derivative Financial Instruments
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We use derivative financial instruments, principally foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts with terms of less than one year, to hedge a portion of our exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our primary exposure to changes in foreign currency rates results from intercompany loans made between affiliates. Additionally, we enter into foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts to mitigate our exposure to changes in exchange rates on certain intercompany and third-party trade receivables and payables. We manage counter-party credit risk by entering into derivative financial instruments with major financial institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of such agreements. We do not enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes.
In managing our foreign currency exposures, we identify and aggregate existing offsetting positions and then hedge residual exposures through third-party derivative contracts. The fair value of our foreign currency forward contracts was a net liability position of less than $1 million at December 31, 2017 and is based on an
25
internally developed model which incorporates observable inputs including quoted spot rates, forward exchange rates and discounted future expected cash flows utilizing market interest rates with similar quality and maturity characteristics. The following table summarizes by major currency the notional amounts for our foreign currency forward purchase and sale contracts as of December 31, 2017. All contracts in the following table mature in 2018.
Notional Amount
in Foreign Currency |
||||||
(Millions) | ||||||
British pounds |
Purchase | 11 | ||||
Canadian dollars |
Sell | (2 | ) | |||
European euro |
Sell | (4 | ) | |||
U.S. dollars |
Purchase | 7 | ||||
Sell | (15 | ) |
Interest Rate Risk
Our financial instruments that are sensitive to market risk for changes in interest rates are primarily our debt securities. We use our revolving credit facilities to finance our short-term and long-term capital requirements. We pay a current market rate of interest on these borrowings. Our long-term capital requirements have been financed with long-term debt with original maturity dates ranging from four to ten years. On December 31, 2017, we had $739 million in long-term debt obligations that have fixed interest rates. Of that amount, $500 million is fixed through July 2026, $225 million is fixed through December 2024 and the remainder is fixed through 2025. We also have $637 million in long-term debt obligations that are subject to variable interest rates. For more detailed explanations on our debt structure and senior credit facility refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources Capitalization earlier in this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
We estimate that the fair value of our long-term debt at December 31, 2017 was about 102 percent of its book value. A one percentage point increase or decrease in interest rates would increase or decrease the annual interest expense we recognize in the income statement and the cash we pay for interest expense by about $7 million.
Equity Prices
We also utilize an equity swap arrangement to offset changes in liabilities related to the equity market risks of our arrangements for deferred compensation and restricted stock unit awards. Gain or losses from changes in the fair value of these equity swaps are generally offset by the losses or gains on the related liabilities. In the second quarter of 2017, we entered into an equity swap agreement with a financial institution. We selectively use cash-settled equity swaps to reduce market risk associated with our deferred liabilities. These equity compensation liabilities increase as our stock price increases and decrease as our stock price decreases. In contrast, the value of the swap agreement moves in the opposite direction of these liabilities, allowing us to fix a portion of the liabilities at a certain amount. As of December 31, 2017, we had hedged deferred liability related to approximately 250,000 common share equivalents.
Environmental Matters, Legal Proceedings and Product Warranties
Note 12 of the consolidated financial statements located in Part II Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplemental Data is incorporated herein by reference.
Tenneco 401(k) Retirement Savings Plans
Effective January 1, 2012, the Tenneco Employee Stock Ownership Plan for Hourly Employees and the Tenneco Employee Stock Ownership Plan for Salaried Employees were merged into one plan called the
26
Tenneco 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (the Retirement Savings Plan). Under the plan, subject to limitations in the Internal Revenue Code, participants may elect to defer up to 75 percent of their salary through contributions to the plan, which are invested in selected mutual funds or used to buy our common stock. We match 100 percent of an employees contributions up to three percent of the employees salary and 50 percent of an employees contributions that are between three percent and five percent of the employees salary. In connection with freezing the defined benefit pension plans for nearly all U.S. based salaried and non-union hourly employees effective December 31, 2006, and the related replacement of those defined benefit plans with defined contribution plans, we are making additional contributions to the Employee Stock Ownership Plans. We recorded expense for these contributions of approximately $29 million, $28 million and $27 million in 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. Matching contributions vest immediately. Defined benefit replacement contributions fully vest on the employees third anniversary of employment.
27
Exhibit 99.4
ITEM 8. |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. |
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TENNECO INC.
AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of Tenneco Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)). Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013). Based on this assessment, our management identified control deficiencies as of December 31, 2017 which constituted a material weakness.
A material weakness (as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act) is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement in our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
During the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the Company identified deficiencies that, when aggregated together, resulted in a material weakness in the Companys internal control over financial reporting in China. The Company did not have people with appropriate authority and experience in key positions in China. Specifically, we did not have adequate international oversight to prevent the intentional mischaracterization of the nature of accounting transactions related to payments received by the Company from suppliers by certain purchasing and accounting personnel at the Companys Chinese subsidiaries.
The material weakness described above resulted in immaterial errors impacting previously issued consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, and each interim and year-to-date period in those respective years. We evaluated these errors and concluded that they did not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a material misstatement of our previously issued consolidated financial statements. However, the identified misstatements resulting from the intentional mischaracterizations discussed above would be material if corrected as an out-of-period adjustment. Additionally, this material weakness could result in the misstatement of the relevant account balances or disclosures that would result in a material misstatement to the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would not be prevented or detected.
As a result of the material weakness described above, we have concluded that we did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.
Our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein.
February 28, 2018
2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Tenneco Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tenneco Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15 (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). We also have audited the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO because a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for payments received by the Company from suppliers by certain purchasing and accounting personnel at the Companys Chinese subsidiaries existed as of that date.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness referred to above is described in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. We considered this material weakness in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2017 consolidated financial statements, and our opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Change in Accounting Principles
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for certain components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs and the manner in which it accounts for the cash received to settle the deferred purchase price of factored receivables in 2018.
Basis for Opinions
The Companys management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in managements report referred to above. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Companys consolidated financial statements and on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
3
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
February 28, 2018, except for the change in composition of reportable segments discussed in Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements and the changes in the manner in which the Company accounts for certain components of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs, cash received to settle the deferred purchase price of factored receivables and restricted cash discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, as to which the date is September 28, 2018
We have served as the Companys auditor since 2010.
4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
Years Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
(Millions Except Share and Per Share Amounts) | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||
Net sales and operating revenues |
$ | 9,274 | $ | 8,599 | $ | 8,181 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation and amortization shown below) |
7,809 | 7,116 | 6,821 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
11 | | | |||||||||
Engineering, research, and development |
158 | 154 | 146 | |||||||||
Selling, general, and administrative |
636 | 513 | 482 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of other intangibles |
224 | 212 | 203 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
8,838 | 7,995 | 7,652 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other expense |
||||||||||||
Loss on sale of receivables |
(5 | ) | (5 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||
Other expense |
(14 | ) | (83 | ) | (17 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(19 | ) | (88 | ) | (21 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Earnings before interest expense, income taxes, and noncontrolling interests |
417 | 516 | 508 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
73 | 92 | 67 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Earnings before income taxes and noncontrolling interests |
344 | 424 | 441 | |||||||||
Income tax expense |
70 | | 146 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
274 | 424 | 295 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
67 | 68 | 54 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income attributable to Tenneco Inc. |
$ | 207 | $ | 356 | $ | 241 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Earnings per share |
||||||||||||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding |
||||||||||||
Basic |
52,796,184 | 55,939,135 | 59,678,309 | |||||||||
Diluted |
53,026,911 | 56,407,436 | 60,193,150 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock |
$ | 3.93 | $ | 6.36 | $ | 4.05 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock |
$ | 3.91 | $ | 6.31 | $ | 4.01 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared |
$ | 1.00 | $ | | $ | |
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements of income.
5
TENNECO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenneco Inc. | Noncontrolling interests | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 207 | $ | 67 | $ | 274 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Translation Adjustment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
$ | (338 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (343 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Translation of foreign currency statements, net of tax |
97 | 97 | 2 | 2 | 99 | 99 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
(241 | ) | (3 | ) | (244 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to the Liability for Pension and Postretirement Benefits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
(327 | ) | | (327 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to the liability for pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax |
27 | 27 | | | 27 | 27 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
(300 | ) | | (300 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
$ | (541 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (544 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
124 | 2 | 126 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income |
$ | 331 | $ | 69 | $ | 400 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements of comprehensive income.
6
TENNECO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenneco Inc. | Noncontrolling interests | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 356 | $ | 68 | $ | 424 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Translation Adjustment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
$ | (297 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (298 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Translation of foreign currency statements, net of tax |
(41 | ) | (41 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (45 | ) | (45 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
(338 | ) | (5 | ) | (343 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to the Liability for Pension and Postretirement Benefits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
(368 | ) | | (368 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to the Liability for Pension and Postretirement benefits, net of tax |
41 | 41 | | | 41 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
(327 | ) | | (327 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
$ | (665 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (670 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
| (4 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income |
$ | 356 | $ | 64 | $ | 420 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements of comprehensive income.
7
TENNECO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year Ended December 31, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tenneco Inc. | Noncontrolling interests | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 241 | $ | 54 | $ | 295 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative Translation Adjustment |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
$ | (166 | ) | $ | 3 | $ | (163 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Translation of foreign currency statements, net of tax |
(131 | ) | (131 | ) | (4 | ) | (4 | ) | (135 | ) | (135 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
(297 | ) | (1 | ) | (298 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to the Liability for Pension and Postretirement Benefits |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
(379 | ) | | (379 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Adjustment to the Liability for Pension and Postretirement benefits, net of tax |
11 | 11 | | | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
(368 | ) | | (368 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
$ | (665 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (666 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
(120 | ) | (4 | ) | (124 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income |
$ | 121 | $ | 50 | $ | 171 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements of comprehensive income.
8
TENNECO INC.
December 31, | ||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 315 | $ | 347 | ||||
Restricted cash |
3 | 2 | ||||||
Receivables |
||||||||
Customer notes and accounts, net |
1,294 | 1,272 | ||||||
Other |
27 | 22 | ||||||
Inventories |
869 | 730 | ||||||
Prepayments and other |
291 | 229 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
2,799 | 2,602 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Long-term receivables, net |
9 | 9 | ||||||
Goodwill |
49 | 57 | ||||||
Intangibles, net |
22 | 19 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
204 | 199 | ||||||
Other |
144 | 103 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
428 | 387 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Plant, property, and equipment, at cost |
4,008 | 3,548 | ||||||
LessAccumulated depreciation and amortization |
(2,393 | ) | (2,191 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,615 | 1,357 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Assets |
$ | 4,842 | $ | 4,346 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Short-term debt (including current maturities of long-term debt) |
$ | 83 | $ | 90 | ||||
Accounts payable |
1,705 | 1,501 | ||||||
Accrued taxes |
45 | 39 | ||||||
Accrued interest |
14 | 15 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
287 | 285 | ||||||
Other |
132 | 43 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
2,266 | 1,973 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-term debt |
1,358 | 1,294 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
11 | 7 | ||||||
Pension and postretirement benefits |
268 | 273 | ||||||
Deferred credits and other liabilities |
155 | 139 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
4,058 | 3,686 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Redeemable noncontrolling interests |
42 | 40 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Tenneco Inc. Shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Premium on common stock and other capital surplus |
3,112 | 3,098 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(541 | ) | (665 | ) | ||||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
(946 | ) | (1,100 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,626 | 1,334 | |||||||
LessShares held as treasury stock, at cost |
930 | 761 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Tenneco Inc. shareholders equity |
696 | 573 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Noncontrolling interests |
46 | 47 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total equity |
742 | 620 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity |
$ | 4,842 | $ | 4,346 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these balance sheets.
9
TENNECO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||
Operating Activities |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 274 | $ | 424 | $ | 295 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
11 | | | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of other intangibles |
224 | 212 | 203 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(10 | ) | (80 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||
Stock-based compensation |
14 | 14 | 15 | |||||||||
Loss on sale of assets |
5 | 4 | 4 | |||||||||
Changes in components of working capital |
||||||||||||
Increase in receivables |
(81 | ) | (325 | ) | (203 | ) | ||||||
Increase in inventories |
(96 | ) | (57 | ) | (36 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in prepayments and other current assets |
(39 | ) | (8 | ) | 37 | |||||||
Increase in payables |
129 | 114 | 90 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in accrued taxes |
4 | 2 | (1 | ) | ||||||||
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest |
(2 | ) | 12 | 1 | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities |
68 | 26 | (10 | ) | ||||||||
Change in long-term assets |
(22 | ) | 6 | 3 | ||||||||
Change in long-term liabilities |
34 | 33 | 8 | |||||||||
Other |
4 | (3 | ) | 11 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
517 | 374 | 415 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Investing Activities |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
8 | 6 | 4 | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale of equity interest |
9 | | | |||||||||
Cash payments for plant, property, and equipment |
(394 | ) | (325 | ) | (286 | ) | ||||||
Cash payments for software related intangible assets |
(25 | ) | (20 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from deferred purchase price of factored receivables |
112 | 110 | 113 | |||||||||
Other |
(10 | ) | | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash used by investing activities |
(300 | ) | (229 | ) | (192 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Financing Activities |
||||||||||||
Cash dividends |
(53 | ) | | | ||||||||
Retirement of long-term debt |
(19 | ) | (531 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||
Issuance of long-term debt |
137 | 509 | 1 | |||||||||
Debt issuance costs of long-term debt |
(8 | ) | (9 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
Purchase of common stock under the share repurchase program |
(169 | ) | (225 | ) | (213 | ) | ||||||
(Repurchase) issuance of common stock |
(1 | ) | 13 | 1 | ||||||||
(Decrease) increase in bank overdrafts |
(7 | ) | 10 | (22 | ) | |||||||
Net (decrease) increase in revolver borrowings and short-term debt excluding current maturities of long-term debt and short-term borrowings secured by accounts receivable |
(67 | ) | 202 | 102 | ||||||||
Net increase in short-term borrowings secured by accounts receivable |
| | 30 | |||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest partners |
(64 | ) | (55 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash used by financing activities |
(251 | ) | (86 | ) | (183 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
3 | 2 | (37 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(Decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
(31 | ) | 61 | 3 | ||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, January 1 |
349 | 288 | 285 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, December 31 (Note) |
$ | 318 | $ | 349 | $ | 288 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
||||||||||||
Cash paid during the year for interest |
$ | 78 | $ | 76 | $ | 68 | ||||||
Cash paid during the year for income taxes (net of refunds) |
95 | 113 | 105 | |||||||||
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities |
||||||||||||
Period end balance of trade payables for plant, property, and equipment |
$ | 59 | $ | 68 | $ | 50 | ||||||
Deferred purchase price of receivables factored in period |
114 | 109 | 113 |
Note: |
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase. |
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements of cash flows.
10
TENNECO INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
(Millions Except Share Amounts) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
65,891,930 | $ | 1 | 65,067,132 | $ | 1 | 64,454,248 | $ | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Issued pursuant to benefit plans |
34,760 | | 292,514 | | 335,766 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Restricted shares forfeited |
(126,682 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
233,501 | | 532,284 | | 277,118 | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
66,033,509 | 1 | 65,891,930 | 1 | 65,067,132 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Premium on Common Stock and Other Capital Surplus |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
3,098 | 3,081 | 3,059 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Premium on common stock issued pursuant to benefit plans |
14 | 17 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
3,112 | 3,098 | 3,081 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
(665 | ) | (665 | ) | (545 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive gain (loss) |
124 | | (120 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
(541 | ) | (665 | ) | (665 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
(1,100 | ) | (1,456 | ) | (1,697 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Tenneco Inc. |
207 | 356 | 241 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared |
(53 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
(946 | ) | (1,100 | ) | (1,456 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
LessCommon Stock Held as Treasury Stock, at Cost |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
11,655,938 | 761 | 7,473,325 | 536 | 3,244,692 | 323 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of common stock through stock repurchase program |
2,936,950 | 169 | 4,182,613 | 225 | 4,228,633 | 213 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
14,592,888 | 930 | 11,655,938 | 761 | 7,473,325 | 536 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total Tenneco Inc. shareholders equity |
$ | 696 | $ | 573 | $ | 425 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
47 | 39 | 40 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
31 | 32 | 22 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
(1 | ) | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared |
(31 | ) | (22 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance December 31 |
$ | 46 | $ | 47 | $ | 39 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total equity |
$ | 742 | $ | 620 | $ | 464 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements of changes in shareholders equity.
11
TENNECO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. |
Summary of Accounting Policies |
Consolidation and Presentation
Our consolidated financial statements include all majority-owned subsidiaries. We have eliminated intercompany transactions. We have evaluated all subsequent events through the date our financial statements were issued.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. These estimates include, among others, allowances for doubtful receivables, promotional and product returns, income taxes, pension and postretirement benefit plans, and contingencies. These items are covered in more detail in the accompanying Footnotes (See Note 1, Note 7, Note 10, and Note 12). Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
We have noncontrolling interests in five joint ventures with redemption features that could require us to purchase the noncontrolling interests at fair value in the event of a change in control of Tenneco Inc. or certain of our subsidiaries. We do not believe that it is probable that the redemption features in any of these joint venture agreements will be triggered. However, the redemption of these shares is not solely within our control. Accordingly, the related noncontrolling interests are presented as Redeemable noncontrolling interests in the temporary equity section of our consolidated balance sheets.
The following is a rollforward of activity in our redeemable noncontrolling interests for the years ending December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively:
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | ||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||
Balance January 1 |
$ | 40 | $ | 41 | $ | 34 | ||||||
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests |
36 | 36 | 32 | |||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
3 | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
Dividends declared |
(37 | ) | (35 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance December 31 |
$ | 42 | $ | 40 | $ | 41 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
At December 31, 2017 and 2016, inventory by major classification was as follows:
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||
Finished goods |
$ | 349 | $ | 284 | ||||
Work in process |
268 | 245 | ||||||
Raw materials |
178 | 137 | ||||||
Materials and supplies |
74 | 64 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$869 | $730 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
12
TENNECO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost methods. Work in process includes purchased parts such as substrates coated with precious metals.
Goodwill and Intangibles, net
We evaluate goodwill for impairment in the fourth quarter of each year, or more frequently if events indicate it is warranted.
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update 2017-04, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. To address concerns over the cost and complexity of the two-step goodwill impairment test, the new standard removes the second step of the test. An entity will apply a one-step quantitative test and record the amount of goodwill impairment as the excess of a reporting units carrying amount over its fair value, not to exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. A public business entity should adopt the amendments in this update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment test performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We adopted this standard in the first quarter of 2017.
We compare the estimated fair value of our reporting units with goodwill to the carrying value of the units net assets to determine if a goodwill impairment exists. We estimate the fair value of each reporting unit using the income approach which is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. The income approach is dependent on a number of factors, including estimates of market trends, forecasted revenues and expenses, capital expenditures, weighted average cost of capital and other variables. A separate discount rate derived by a combination of published sources, internal estimates and weighted based on our debt to equity ratio, was used to calculate the discounted cash flows for each of our reporting units. These estimates are based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and outside of the control of management. If the carrying value of our reporting units exceeds their current fair value as determined based on discounted future cash flows of the related business, the goodwill is considered impaired. As a result, a goodwill impairment loss would be measured at the amount by which a reporting units carrying amount exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill.
As a result of our goodwill impairment evaluation in the fourth quarter of 2017, we determined that the estimated fair value of the Europe and South America Ride Performance reporting unit was lower than its carrying value. Accordingly, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $11 million in the fourth quarter. We reached this determination based on updated long-term projections for the Europe and South America Ride Performance reporting unit provided by the Companys annual budgeting and strategic planning process, which is completed in the fourth quarter. The 2017 annual budgeting and strategic planning process indicated that the reporting units recovery period will be longer than previously expected. In the fourth quarter of 2017, the estimated fair value of our other reporting units substantially exceeded the carrying value of their assets and liabilities as of the testing date for goodwill impairment.
At December 31, 2017, accumulated goodwill impairment charges include $306 million related to our North America Ride Performance reporting unit, $43 million related to our Europe and South America Ride Performance reporting unit and $11 million related to our Asia Pacific Ride Performance reporting unit.
In the fourth quarter of 2016 and 2015, the estimated fair value of each of our reporting units exceeded the carrying value of their assets and liabilities as of the testing date for goodwill impairment.
13
TENNECO INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Continued)
The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:
Clean Air
Segment |
Ride
Performance Segment |
Aftermarket
Segment |
Total | |||||||||||||
(Millions) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2015 |
$ | 14 | $ | 22 | $ | 24 | $ | 60 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Translation Adjustment |
(1 | ) | (2 | ) | | (3 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
13 | 20 | 24 | 57 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Translation Adjustment |
2 | | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill Impairment Charge |
| (7 | ) | (4 | ) | (11 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
$ | 15 | $ | 13 | $ | 21 | $ | 49 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have capitalized certain intangible assets, primarily technology rights, trademarks and patents, based on their estimated fair value at the date we acquired them. We amortize our finite useful life intangible assets on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 3 to 50 years. Amortization of intangibles amounted to $3 million in both 2017 and 2016, and $5 million in 2015, and are included in the statements of income caption Depreciation and amortization of intangibles. The carrying amount and accumulated amortization of our finite useful life intangible assets were as follows:
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying
Value |
Accumulated
Amortization |
Gross Carrying
Value |
Accumulated
Amortization |
|||||||||||||
(Millions) | (Millions) | |||||||||||||||
Customer contract |
$ | 8 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 8 | $ | (5 | ) | ||||||
Patents |
1 | (1 | ) | 1 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Technology rights |
29 | (23 | ) | 29 | (21 | ) | ||||||||||
Other |
15 | (2 | ) | 9 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ |