As filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on October 18, 2018
File No.
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10
GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES
PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR 12(g) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Corteva, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 82-4979096 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
974 Centre Road Wilmington, Delaware |
19805 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (302) 774-1000
Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class to be so registered |
Name of each exchange on which
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share |
Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, smaller reporting company and emerging growth company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | ☐ | Accelerated filer | ☐ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ☒ | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | |||
Emerging growth company | ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
CORTEVA, INC.
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN REGISTRATION STATEMENT
CROSS-REFERENCE SHEET BETWEEN INFORMATION STATEMENT AND ITEMS OF FORM 10
Certain information required to be included in this Form 10 is incorporated by reference to specifically-identified portions of the body of the information statement filed herewith as Exhibit 99.1 and which will be delivered to stockholders. None of the information contained in the information statement shall be incorporated by reference herein or deemed to be a part hereof unless such information is specifically incorporated by reference.
Item 1. Business .
The information required by this item is contained under the sections of the information statement entitled Information Statement Summary, Risk Factors, Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements, The Distribution, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Business, Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions, Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution and Where You Can Find More Information. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors .
The information required by this item is contained under the sections of the information statement entitled Risk Factors and Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 2. Financial Information .
The information required by this item is contained under the sections of the information statement entitled Capitalization, Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements, Supplemental Managements Discussion and Analysis of Pro Forma Segment Results, Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 3. Properties .
The information required by this item is contained under the section of the information statement entitled BusinessFacilities. That section is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 4. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management .
The information required by this item is contained under the section of the information statement entitled Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. That section is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 5. Directors and Executive Officers.
The information required by this item is contained under the section of the information statement entitled Management. That section is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 6. Executive Compensation .
The information required by this item is contained under the sections of the information statement entitled Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Executive Compensation. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence .
The information required by this item is contained under the sections of the information statement entitled Management, Executive Compensation, Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions and Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 8. Legal Proceedings .
The information required by this item is contained under the section of the information statement entitled BusinessEnvironmental and Other Legal Proceedings. That section is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9. Market Price of, and Dividends on, the Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters .
The information required by this item is contained under the sections of the information statement entitled Risk Factors, The Distribution, Dividend Policy, Capitalization and Description of Our Capital Stock. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 10. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities .
The information required by this item is contained under the section of the information statement entitled Description of Our Capital Stock. That section is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Description of Registrants Securities to be Registered .
The information required by this item is contained under the sections of the information statement entitled Risk Factors, The Distribution, Dividend Policy, Capitalization and Description of Our Capital Stock. Those sections are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Indemnification of Directors and Officers .
The information required by this item is contained under the section of the information statement entitled Description of Our Capital Stock. That section is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data .
The information required by this item is contained in the financial statements that are filed as Exhibits 99.2 and 99.3 hereto and which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional information is contained under the section of the information statement entitled Merger, Intended Separations, Reorganization and Financial Statement PresentationFinancial Statement Presentation.
Item 14. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure .
None.
Item 15. Financial Statements and Exhibits .
(a) Financial Statements
The information required by this item is contained in the financial statements that are filed as Exhibits 99.2, 99.3, 99.4 and 99.5 hereto and which are incorporated herein by reference. Additional information is contained under the section of the information statement entitled Merger, Intended Separations, Reorganization and Financial Statement PresentationFinancial Statement Presentation.
(b) Exhibits
The following documents are filed as exhibits hereto:
Exhibit
|
Exhibit Description |
|
2.1 | Form of Separation and Distribution Agreement by and among DowDuPont Inc., Dow Holdings Inc. and Corteva, Inc.* | |
3.1 | Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Corteva, Inc.* | |
3.2 | Form of Amended and Restated By-Laws of Corteva, Inc.* | |
10.1 | Form of Tax Matters Agreement by and among DowDuPont Inc., Corteva, Inc. and Dow Holdings Inc.* | |
10.2 | Form of Employee Matters Agreement by and among DowDuPont Inc., Corteva, Inc. and Dow Holdings Inc.* | |
10.3 | Form of Intellectual Property Cross-License Agreement by and between Corteva, Inc. and DowDuPont Inc.* | |
10.4 | Form of Intellectual Property Cross-License Agreement by and between Corteva, Inc. and Dow Holdings Inc.* | |
21.1 | Subsidiaries of Corteva, Inc.* | |
99.1 | Information Statement of Corteva, Inc., preliminary and subject to completion, dated October 18, 2018. | |
99.2 | The Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, and the accompanying notes thereto. | |
99.3 | The Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2018, and the accompanying notes thereto. | |
99.4 | The Audited Combined Financial Statements of The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. | |
99.5 | The Unaudited Combined Financial Statements of The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business for the periods ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017. |
* |
To be filed by amendment. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Corteva, Inc. | ||
By: | /s/ Gregory R. Friedman | |
Name: Gregory R. Friedman Title: Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer |
Date: October 18, 2018
Exhibit 99.1
Dear DowDuPont Stockholder:
We are pleased to deliver to you this information statement to inform you that on , the board of directors of DowDuPont Inc. (DowDuPont) approved the distribution of all the then issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Corteva, Inc. (Corteva), a wholly owned subsidiary of DowDuPont, to DowDuPont stockholders. At the time of the distribution, Corteva will hold DowDuPonts agriculture business.
As previously announced, DowDuPont intends to separate into three independent, publicly traded companiesone for each of its agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesses. The distribution to DowDuPont stockholders of all the shares of common stock of Corteva is expected to be one of two distributions to effectuate this separation plan. The other distribution is expected to be of Dow Holdings Inc. (Dow), the DowDuPont subsidiary that will hold, at the time of its distribution, the assets and liabilities associated with DowDuPonts materials science business. It is expected that after the distribution of Corteva, DowDuPont will be renamed (New DuPont). Once renamed, New DuPont is expected to change its symbol to , and the DowDuPont name and DWDP symbol are expected to be retired. Until such time, DowDuPont will continue to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DWDP.
The distribution of Corteva common stock will occur on , 2019 by way of a pro rata dividend to DowDuPont stockholders. Each DowDuPont stockholder will be entitled to receive shares of Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock held by such stockholder at the close of business on , 2019, the record date of the distribution.
Immediately following each distribution, DowDuPont stockholders as of the record date for the applicable distribution will own 100% of the common stock of each subsidiary being distributed and the applicable subsidiary will become a publicly traded company. Assuming both distributions are completed, immediately following the second distribution, New DuPont will continue to hold DowDuPonts specialty products business. The DowDuPont board of directors believes that creating three focused companies is the best way to drive value for all of DowDuPonts stakeholders. They also believe that the separation of the agriculture business from DowDuPont will better position both companies to capitalize on significant growth opportunities and focus their resources on their respective businesses and strategic priorities.
We expect the distribution of Corteva common stock to be tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except for any cash received in lieu of fractional shares. You should consult your own tax advisor as to the particular tax consequences of the distribution of Corteva common stock to you, including potential tax consequences under state, local and non-U.S. tax laws.
Stockholder approval of the distribution is not required. You are not required to take any action to receive your Corteva common stock and you do not need to pay any consideration or surrender or exchange your DowDuPont shares to receive your Corteva common stock.
Immediately following the distribution, you will own shares in both New DuPont and Corteva. We intend to apply to have Cortevas common stock listed on the under the symbol .
The enclosed information statement is being mailed to all DowDuPont stockholders who held shares of DowDuPont common stock as of the record date for the distribution of Corteva common stock. This statement describes the distribution in detail and contains important information about DowDuPont, Corteva and the distribution. We urge you to read the information statement carefully.
We want to thank you for your continued support of DowDuPont, and we look forward to your support of Corteva in the future.
Sincerely, | ||
|
|
|
Edward D. Breen Chief Executive Officer DowDuPont Inc. |
Dear Corteva Stockholder:
Cortevawhich means center of naturecombines the DuPont Pioneer, Dow AgroSciences and DuPont Crop Protection businesses to create a stronger global provider of agricultural products. We are recognized by farmers as a leader in the seed and crop protection markets globally. Our seed platform develops and supplies high quality germplasm combined with advanced traits to produce higher yields for farmers around the world. Our crop protection platform supplies products to protect crop yields against weeds, insects and disease, enabling farmers to achieve optimal results. The combination of these leading platforms creates one of the broadest portfolios of agriculture solutions in the industry and generated pro forma annual sales of $14 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017 by fueling farmer productivity in more than 130 countries. Our strategy is to provide farmers with the right mix of seeds, crop protection and digital solutions to maximize their yields, strengthening customer relationships while ensuring an abundant food supply for a growing global population. We also have the opportunity, through our merger, to drive synergy benefits totaling $1.6 billion, including $1.1 billion in cost synergies and $500 million in growth synergies. Our synergy project, along with our ongoing productivity efforts, are aimed at delivering a best-in-class cost structure versus our peers, as well as a sharper focus on the customer.
We expect to create shareholder value by continuing to advance our science-based innovation focused on delivering a wide range of improved products and services to our customers. Through our merger of the Historical DuPont and Historical Dow innovations pipelines, we have created one of the broadest and most productive new product pipelines in the agriculture industry. We intend to leverage our rich heritage of over 275 combined years of scientific achievement to advance our robust innovation pipeline and continue to shape the future of responsible agriculture. We intend to launch 21 new products, balanced between seeds and crop protection, between 2018 and 2021. New products are crucial to solving farmers productivity challenges amid a growing global population while addressing natural resistance, regulatory changes, safety requirements and competitive dynamics. Our investment in technology-based and solution-based product offerings allow us to meet farmers evolving needs while ensuring that our investments generate sufficient returns. Meanwhile, through our unique routes to market, we continue to work face-to-face with farmers around the world to deeply understand their needs.
We intend to apply to have Corteva common stock listed on the under the symbol in connection with the distribution of our companys common stock by DowDuPont.
We believe Corteva will be a unique company in the agriculture industry, with a global footprint, a breadth of product offerings, a lean cost structure and an advantaged route to market that provides unmatched customer intimacya competitive advantage that we believe will deliver strong returns. We invite you to learn more about Corteva by reviewing the enclosed information statement. We hope it conveys our excitement and allows you to understand our plans to stand and spin Corteva successfully next year. We look forward to our future as an independent, publicly traded company and to your support as a holder of Corteva common stock.
Sincerely, | ||
James C. Collins, Jr. Chief Executive Officer |
Preliminary and Subject to Completion, dated October 18, 2018
INFORMATION STATEMENT
Corteva, Inc.
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share
This information statement is being furnished to the holders of common stock of DowDuPont Inc. (DowDuPont) in connection with the distribution of shares of common stock of Corteva, Inc. (Corteva). Corteva is a wholly owned subsidiary of DowDuPont that, at the time of the distribution, will hold DowDuPonts agriculture business. DowDuPont will distribute all the outstanding shares of Corteva common stock on a pro rata basis to its common stockholders.
Corteva is organized as a corporation under the laws of the State of Delaware.
For every share of DowDuPont common stock held of record by you as of the close of business on , 2019, the record date for the distribution, you will receive shares of Corteva common stock. No fractional shares of Corteva common stock will be issued. Instead, you will receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares. As discussed under The DistributionTrading Between the Record Date and Distribution Date, if you sell your DowDuPont common stock in the regular-way market after the record date and before the separation and distribution, you will also be selling your right to receive shares of Corteva common stock in connection with the separation and distribution. We expect the shares of Corteva common stock to be distributed by DowDuPont to you on June 1, 2019. We refer to the date of distribution of Corteva common stock as the distribution date. After the distribution, we will be an independent, publicly traded company.
No vote of DowDuPont stockholders is required to effect the distribution. Therefore, you are not being asked for a proxy to vote on the separation or the distribution, and you are requested not to send us a proxy. You do not need to pay any consideration, exchange or surrender your existing shares of DowDuPont common stock or take any other action to receive your shares of Corteva common stock.
The distribution is intended to be tax-free to DowDuPont stockholders for United States federal income tax purposes, except for cash received in lieu of fractional shares. The distribution is subject to the satisfaction or waiver by DowDuPont of certain conditions, including the receipt of an opinion of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (Skadden) confirming that the distribution and certain transactions entered into in connection with the distribution generally will be tax-free to DowDuPont and its shareholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except for cash received in lieu of fractional shares. Cash received in lieu of any fractional shares of DowDuPont common stock will generally be taxable to you.
DowDuPont currently owns all the outstanding shares of Corteva. Accordingly, there is no current trading market for Corteva common stock, although we expect that a limited market, commonly known as a when-issued trading market, will develop as early as the trading day prior to the record date for the distribution, and we expect regular-way trading of Corteva common stock to begin on the distribution date. Corteva intends to apply to have its common stock authorized for listing on the under the symbol .
In reviewing this information statement, you should carefully consider the matters described under the caption Risk Factors beginning on page 28.
Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this information statement is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
This information statement does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities.
The date of this information statement is , 2019 and is first being mailed to DowDuPont stockholders on or about , 2019.
The following is a summary of material information discussed in this information statement. This summary may not contain all the details concerning the separation and distribution or other information that may be important to you. To better understand the separation, distribution and our business and financial position, you should carefully review this entire information statement.
Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, references in this information statement to:
|
Business Realignment has the meaning set forth in the section titled Merger, Intended Separations, Reorganization and Financial Statement Presentation; |
|
distribution refers to the transaction in which DowDuPont will distribute to its stockholders all of the then issued and outstanding shares of Corteva common stock; |
|
distribution date refers to the date of the distribution, which is expected to be on June 1, 2019; |
|
Corteva, we, us, our and the Company refer to Corteva Parent and its consolidated subsidiaries (including EID) after giving effect to the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment, resulting in Corteva Parent holding the agriculture business of DowDuPont; |
|
Corteva common stock refers to the shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of Corteva Parent; |
|
Corteva Parent refers to Corteva Inc., the newly formed holding company for DowDuPonts agriculture business; |
|
Dow refers to Dow Parent and its consolidated subsidiaries (including TDCC) after giving effect to the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment, resulting in Dow Parent holding the materials science business of DowDuPont; |
|
Dow AgroSciences refers to the agriculture business of Historical Dow; |
|
Dow Parent refers to Dow Holdings Inc., the newly formed holding company for DowDuPonts materials science business; |
|
DowDuPont refers to DowDuPont Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its consolidated subsidiaries, prior to the distribution of Corteva; |
|
DowDuPont stockholders refers to holders of record of the common stock of DowDuPont in their capacity as such; |
|
EID refers to E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, exclusive of its subsidiaries; |
|
Historical Dow refers to TDCC and its consolidated subsidiaries prior to the Business Realignment; |
|
Historical DuPont refers to EID and its consolidated subsidiaries prior to the Business Realignment; |
|
Internal Reorganization refers to the meaning set forth in the section titled Merger, Intended Separations, Reorganization and Financial Statement Presentation; |
|
New DuPont refers to DowDuPont and its consolidated subsidiaries, following the distribution of Corteva, at which time New DuPont will hold the specialty products business of DowDuPont and is expected to be renamed ; |
|
record date refers to , 2019, the date set by the DowDuPont board of directors to determine the DowDuPont stockholders eligible to receive the distribution of Corteva common stock; |
|
separation refers to the transaction in which Corteva will be separated from DowDuPont; and |
|
TDCC refers to The Dow Chemical Company, exclusive of its subsidiaries. |
1
Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, this information statement describes Corteva as if the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment have been completed and as if Corteva held the agriculture business of DowDuPont during all periods described. As a result, references in this information statement to Cortevas historical assets, liabilities, products, businesses or activities are generally references to the applicable assets, liabilities, products, business or activities of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow on a pro forma basis as if the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment had already occurred and Corteva was a standalone company holding DowDuPonts agriculture business. See the section entitled Merger, Intended Separations, Reorganization and Financial Statement Presentation for further information.
You should carefully read this entire information statement, which forms a part of the registration statement on Form 10 (the Form 10), as well as the financial information contained in Historical DuPonts annual and interim financial statements, and the audited annual and unaudited interim combined financial statements of Dow AgroSciences, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibits 99.2, 99.3, 99.4 and 99.5, respectively, to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part. Some of the statements in this information statement constitute forward-looking statements. See the section entitled Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements.
You should not assume that the information contained in this information statement is accurate as of any date other than the date set forth on the cover. Changes to the information contained in this information statement may occur after that date, and we undertake no obligation to update the information, except in the normal course of our public disclosure obligations.
Trademarks indicated by use of the symbols ® or are trademarks of Historical DuPont, Pioneer, Dow AgroSciences or their affiliated companies or respective owners.
2
MERGER, INTENDED SEPARATIONS, REORGANIZATION AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION
Merger
DowDuPont is a Delaware corporation that was formed on December 9, 2015, for the purpose of effecting the all-stock merger of equals transaction between Historical DuPont and Historical Dow. On August 31, 2017, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow each merged with wholly owned subsidiaries of DowDuPont and, as a result, became subsidiaries of DowDuPont (the Merger). Upon completion of the Merger, each share of EID Preferred Stock$4.50 Series and EID Preferred Stock$3.50 Series (collectively, the EID Preferred Stock) issued and outstanding immediately prior to 11:59 pm Eastern Time on August 31, 2017 (the Effective Time of the Merger) remained issued and outstanding and was unaffected by the Merger.
Intended Separations
Prior to the Merger, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow were each publicly traded companies that were listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE), with Historical DuPont operating a global business that included agriculture, electronics and communications, industrial biosciences, nutrition and health, performance materials and protection solutions segments, and Historical Dow operating a global business that included agricultural sciences, consumer solutions, infrastructure solutions, performance materials and chemicals and performance plastics segments. In connection with the signing of the agreement and plan of merger for the Merger (the merger agreement), Historical DuPont and Historical Dow announced their intention to pursue, subject to the approval of the DowDuPont board of directors and any required regulatory approvals, the separation of the combined company, DowDuPont, into three independent publicly traded companiesone for each of the combined companys agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesses.
Internal Reorganization
In furtherance of DowDuPonts planned separation into three independent, publicly traded companies, prior to, but in connection with, the separation and distribution, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow will undertake a series of internal reorganization transactions to align their respective businesses into three subgroups: agriculture, materials science and specialty products. DowDuPont has also formed two wholly owned subsidiaries: Corteva Parent, to serve as a holding company for its agriculture business, and Dow Parent, to serve as a holding company for its materials science business. Following the distribution of Dow (which is expected to precede the distribution of Corteva), DowDuPont, as the remaining company, will continue to hold the agriculture and specialty products businesses. DowDuPont is then expected to complete the distribution of Corteva and DowDuPont will be renamed , resulting in New DuPont holding the specialty products business of DowDuPont.
This series of reorganization transactions, which we refer to as the Internal Reorganization, will involve:
|
the transferor or conveyance by Historical DuPont of its assets and liabilities that are (i) aligned with DowDuPonts agriculture business to legal entities that remain with us following the Business Realignment, (ii) aligned with DowDuPonts specialty products business (including Historical DuPonts specialty products business) to legal entities that will be subsidiaries of New DuPont following the Business Realignment and (iii) aligned with DowDuPonts materials science business (including Historical DuPonts ethylene and ethylene copolymers business (other than its ethylene acrylic elastomers business)) to legal entities that will be subsidiaries of Dow following the Business Realignment; and |
|
the transfer or conveyance by Historical Dow of its assets and liabilities that are (i) aligned with DowDuPonts agriculture business (including Historical Dows agriculture business) to legal entities that will be our subsidiaries following the Business Realignment (although certain transfers and |
3
conveyances to us may occur after the Business Realignment but prior to the distribution of Dow), (ii) aligned with DowDuPonts specialty products business (including those portions of Historical Dows business that are aligned with the specialty products business) to legal entities that will be subsidiaries of New DuPont following the Business Realignment (though certain transfers and conveyances to legal entities that will be subsidiaries of New DuPont may occur after the Business Realignment but prior to the distribution of Dow) and (iii) aligned with DowDuPonts materials science business to legal entities that will remain with Dow. |
Following the Internal Reorganization, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow will then transfer or convey among us, Dow and legal entities that will be subsidiaries of New DuPont all of the equity interests of the applicable subsidiaries such that, in addition to any assets and liabilities allocated to us, Dow and New DuPont pursuant to the separation agreement, we will hold the assets and liabilities related to DowDuPonts agriculture business, Dow will hold the assets and liabilities related to DowDuPonts materials science business and the legal entities that will comprise New DuPont will hold the assets and liabilities related to DowDuPonts specialty products business. These transfers and conveyances, which we refer to in this information statement as the Business Realignment, will include:
|
the transfer or conveyance of Historical DuPonts interests in the capital stock of, or any other equity interests in, the entities that are to be subsidiaries of Dow or New DuPont to Dow or the legal entities that will comprise New DuPont (although certain transfers and conveyances to legal entities that will comprise New DuPont may occur after the Business Realignment but prior to our expected distribution), as applicable; and |
|
the transfer or conveyance of Historical Dows interests in the capital stock of, or any other equity interests in, the entities that are to be subsidiaries of us or New DuPont to us or the entities that are to be subsidiaries of New DuPont, as applicable. |
As a result of the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment, at the time of the separation and distribution, Corteva Parent will hold all the outstanding common stock of EID. EID will continue to be a subsidiary of Corteva Parent and will remain a reporting issuer with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The EID Preferred Stock will be unaffected by the separation and distribution.
For further information, see the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the DistributionSeparation Agreement.
Financial Statement Presentation
This information statement generally describes Corteva as if the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment have already been completed and Corteva holds the agriculture business of DowDuPont that it will hold at the time of the distribution. Accordingly, this information statement includes an unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet for Corteva as well as unaudited pro forma consolidated statements of income for Corteva, which present our financial position and results of operations to give pro forma effect to the Merger, the Internal Reorganization, the Business Realignment, the distribution of all the common stock of Corteva, and the other transactions described under Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements. The unaudited pro forma combined financial statements are presented for illustrative purposes only and should not be viewed as an indication of current or future results of operations, financial position or cash flows as if Corteva had been a separate, standalone company holding DowDuPonts agriculture business during the periods presented.
This information statement also includes certain historical consolidated financial information related to, and discusses the results of operations, financial condition and business of, Historical DuPont. For example, the historical financial statements incorporated by reference herein reflect Historical DuPonts business as it has been conducted prior to the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment. These financial statements therefore reflect the business of Historical DuPont, which includes those portions of Historical DuPonts business that
4
form part of DowDuPonts materials science business that will be transferred to Dow and those portions of Historical DuPonts business that form part of DowDuPonts specialty products business that will ultimately remain with New DuPont. The financial statements also do not reflect the portions of Historical Dows business related to DowDuPonts agriculture business that will be transferred to us. As such, Historical DuPonts financial information and results are not representative of the financial results that we would have achieved as a separate, publicly traded company holding DowDuPonts agriculture business nor indicative of the results we expect for any future period. Information in this information statement that does not reflect Corteva as it will be comprised at the time of the separation and distribution is generally identified by reference to Historical DuPont. For further information, see the sections entitled Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Corteva Parent is a wholly owned subsidiary of DowDuPont that was formed on March 16, 2018 to serve as a holding company for Corteva. Corteva Parent has engaged in no business operations to date and has no assets or liabilities of any kind, other than those incident to its formation.
5
Distributing Company
DowDuPont is a holding company comprised of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow. DowDuPont conducts its operations worldwide through the following eight segments: Agriculture; Performance Materials & Coatings; Industrial Intermediates & Infrastructure; Packaging & Specialty Plastics; Electronics & Imaging; Nutrition & Biosciences; Transportation & Advanced Polymers; and Safety & Construction. DowDuPont has approximately 98,000 employees.
In connection with the signing of the merger agreement, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow announced their intention, subject to the approval of the DowDuPont board of directors and any required regulatory approvals, to separate DowDuPont into three independent, publicly traded companiesone for each of the combined companys agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesses.
The distribution of Dow, which at the time of the distribution will hold DowDuPonts materials science business, is expected to be the first of the two distributions to effectuate DowDuPonts plan to separate into three strong, independent, publicly traded companies. Following the distribution of Dow, the remaining company, which will hold DowDuPonts agriculture and specialty products business, is expected to then complete, subject to the approval of its board of directors, the distribution of Corteva, which will hold the assets and liabilities associated with DowDuPonts agriculture business, resulting in New DuPont holding the specialty products business of DowDuPont. The separation of Corteva is expected to be completed on June 1, 2019 through the distribution to DowDuPont stockholders of all the Corteva common stock.
The DowDuPont board of directors believes that the completion of these separations will result in three independent, publicly traded companies that will lead their respective industries through productive, science-based innovation to meet the needs of customers and help solve global challenges, and is the best available opportunity to unlock the value of DowDuPonts businesses.
Our Company
Cortevawhich means center of naturecombines the DuPont Pioneer, Dow AgroSciences and DuPont Crop Protection businesses to create a stronger global provider of agricultural products. We are recognized by farmers as a leader in the seed and crop protection markets globally. Our seed platform develops and supplies high quality germplasm combined with advanced traits to produce higher yields for farmers around the world. Our crop protection platform supplies products to protect crop yields against weeds, insects and disease enabling farmers to achieve optimal results. The combination of these leading platforms creates one of the broadest portfolios of agriculture solutions in the industry and generated pro forma annual sales of $14 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017 by fueling farmer productivity in more than 130 countries. Our strategy is to provide farmers with the right mix of seeds, crop protection and digital solutions to maximize their yields, strengthening customer relationships while ensuring an abundant food supply for a growing global population. We have the opportunity to enhance our returns by completing the delivery of $1.6 billion from merger-related synergies, including $1.1 billion in cost synergies and $500 million in growth synergies. Our goal is to achieve a best-in-class cost structure versus our peers, creating or lean organization more focused on the customer.
We will operate in two reportable segments: seed and crop protection. Our seed segment is a global leader in developing and supplying advanced germplasm and traits that produce optimum yield for farms around the world. We are a leader in many of our key seed markets, including North America corn and soybeans, Europe corn and sunflower, Brazil corn and Argentina corn. We offer trait technologies that improve resistance to
6
weather, disease, insects and weeds, and trait technologies that enhance food and nutritional characteristics. We also provide digital solutions that assist farmer decision-making with a view to optimize product selection and, ultimately, maximize yield and profitability. We compete in a wide variety of agricultural markets. Our crop protection segment serves the global agricultural input industry with products that protect against weeds, insects and other pests, and disease, and that improve overall crop health both above and below ground via nitrogen management and seed-applied technologies. We are a leader in global herbicides, insecticides and below-ground nitrogen stabilizers.
We expect to create shareholder value by continuing to deliver a best-in-class cost structure versus our peers while advancing our science-based innovation, which is focused on delivering a wide range of improved products and services to our customers. Through our merger of the Historical DuPont and Historical Dow innovations pipelines, we have created one of the broadest and most productive new product pipelines in the agriculture industry. We intend to leverage our rich heritage of over 275 combined years of scientific achievement to advance our robust innovation pipeline and continue to shape the future of responsible agriculture. We intend to launch 21 new products, balanced between seeds and crop protection, between 2018 and 2021. New products are crucial to solving farmers productivity challenges amid a growing global population while addressing natural resistance, regulatory changes, safety requirements and competitive dynamics. Our investment in technology-based and solution-based product offerings allow us to meet farmers evolving needs while ensuring that our investments generate sufficient returns. Meanwhile, through our unique routes to market, we continue to work face-to-face with farmers around the world to deeply understand their needs.
Our Strengths
We believe the following attributes provide us with a competitive advantage in our industry:
|
Leadership position in key markets . We are a leader in many of our key seed markets, including North America corn and soybeans, Europe corn and sunflower, Brazil corn and Argentina corn. We are also a crop protection market leader in global herbicides, insecticides, biologics and below-the-ground nitrogen stabilizers. |
|
Strong customer relationships . We are a trusted partner in the global agriculture and food community, having earned the confidence of those who produce as well as those who consume. Our combination of market penetration, strong brand portfolio and robust germplasm allows us to serve as a trusted partner addressing a wide range of farmer needs in all major geographic regions and in many major crops. |
|
Holistic solutions for farmers . We deliver a complete end-to-end farm management solution with integrated seed and crop protection offerings that provide farmers with an integrated approach to crop management. Through the combination of Historical DuPonts and Historical Dows complementary seed and crop protection portfolios, we are now able to serve farmers year-round, offering products covering more than 100 crops that give farmers expanded choice and greater value. |
|
Enhanced seed and crop protection pipelines . We have historically invested and will continue to invest significant funds in research and development. By integrating the Historical DuPont and Historical Dow pipelines, we have created one of the broadest and most innovative pipelines in the agricultural input industry. |
|
Deep industry expertise . We have a strong management team that combines in-depth industry experience and demonstrated leadership. Our leadership team represents leaders from both Historical DuPont and Historical Dow as we retained the top talent during the Merger and separation process. |
7
Our Strategy
Our strategy is to combine our proven innovation capability with our unmatched customer access to provide farmers with a portfolio of products that enable continued improvements in yield and profitability, while improving environmental sustainability.
To drive industry-leading value creation, we will pursue the following five priorities:
|
Deliver above-market growth via our robust new product pipeline and best-in-class routes to market. |
|
Consistently grow earnings across the agricultural cycle with a best-in-class cost structure versus our peers. |
|
Drive disciplined capital and resource allocation with a strong focus on return on invested capital. |
|
Develop innovative solutions that improve farmer productivity and global food security. |
|
Instill a strong, performance-based, inclusive, customer-centric culture. |
More broadly, we believe the following key pillars will enable us to create significant value for our customers while delivering strong financial returns to our shareholders:
|
Developing and launching new offerings that address market needs by continuing to leverage our robust pipeline to introduce new proprietary seed traits and crop protection formulations that anticipate and meet evolving customer needs . |
|
Utilizing our multi-channel and multi-brand capabilities to drive profitable growth by strategically aligning our brands and capabilities across different sales channels and creating a comprehensive multi-channel, multi-brand strategy. |
|
Continuing to develop and maintain close connections with our customers by working closely with farmers throughout the entire growing season to ensure all their seed and crop protection needs are anticipated and satisfied. |
|
Focusing on operational excellence by integrating our operations and continuing to drive operating efficiencies, enabling a streamlined, efficient and focused organization with a best-in-class cost structure. |
|
Furthering our commitment to sustainable and responsible agriculture by focusing on integrating sustainability criteria early in the product discovery and development phases as well as promoting the development of responsible solutions focused on reducing the environmental impact of agriculture over time. |
Risks Associated with Our Business
An investment in Corteva common stock is subject to several risks, including the following:
|
We participate in an industry that is highly competitive and has undergone consolidation, which could increase competitive pressures. |
|
The successful development and commercialization of our pipeline products will be necessary for our growth. |
|
We may not be able to obtain or maintain the necessary regulatory approvals for some of our products, including our seed and crop protection products, which could restrict our ability to sell those products in some markets. |
|
Enforcing our intellectual property rights, or defending against intellectual property claims asserted by others, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
8
|
Our business may be adversely affected by competition from manufacturers of generic products. |
|
The costs of complying with evolving regulatory requirements could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
|
The degree of public understanding and acceptance or perceived public acceptance of our biotechnology and other agricultural products and technologies can affect our sales and results of operations by affecting planting approvals, regulatory requirements and customer purchase decisions. |
|
As a result of our current and past operations, as well as the discontinued and divested businesses and operations of Historical DuPont, we could incur significant environmental liabilities. |
|
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by litigation and other commitments and contingencies. |
|
Changes in agricultural and related policies of governments and international organizations may prove unfavorable. |
The above list of risk factors is not exhaustive. Please read the information in the section entitled Risk Factors for a more thorough description of these and other risks.
The Separation and Distribution
The separation and distribution of Corteva is the second step in DowDuPonts intended separation of its agriculture, materials science and specialty products divisions into three independent, publicly traded companies. The separation and distribution of Dow, which at the time of such distribution will hold DowDuPonts materials science business, is expected to precede the separation and distribution of Corteva.
On , the DowDuPont board of directors approved the distribution of all the then issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Corteva Parent, the newly formed holding company for Corteva that at the time of the distribution will hold DowDuPonts agriculture business, to DowDuPont stockholders on the basis of shares of Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock held on , 2019, the record date for the distribution. As a result of the distribution, we will become an independent, publicly traded company. The distribution is intended to be generally tax-free to DowDuPont stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except for any cash received in lieu of fractional shares.
The distributions are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions. The DowDuPont board of directors has the discretion to abandon one or both of the intended distributions and to alter the terms of each distribution. See the section entitled The DistributionConditions to the Distribution. As a result, Corteva cannot provide any assurances that either distribution will be completed.
Internal Reorganization
In advance of the distributions, DowDuPont will undertake the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment so that (1) Dow will hold, directly or indirectly, DowDuPonts materials science business; (2) we will hold, directly or indirectly, DowDuPonts agriculture business; and (3) the legal entities that will comprise New DuPont will hold, directly or indirectly, DowDuPonts specialty products business. See the section entitled Merger, Intended Separations, Reorganization and Financial Statement PresentationInternal Reorganization and Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the DistributionSeparation Agreement for further discussion.
Cortevas Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution
Substantially simultaneously with the distribution of Dow, we will enter into a separation and distribution agreement with DowDuPont (which will, after the separation of Corteva, become New DuPont) and Dow, which
9
is referred to in this information statement as the separation agreement, to effect the separation (including the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment) and provide a framework for our relationship with New DuPont and Dow after the separation and distribution. In connection with the separation and distribution, we will also enter into various other agreements with DowDuPont and Dow, including a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, intellectual property cross-license agreements, trademark license agreements and certain other intellectual property, services, supply and real estate-related agreements. These agreements will collectively provide for the terms of the allocation among us, New DuPont and Dow of the assets, liabilities and obligations of DowDuPont and its subsidiaries (including investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to the periods prior to, at and after Dows and our respective separations, and will govern certain relationships among us, New DuPont and Dow after the separation and distribution. In connection with the separation of Dow and us from DowDuPont, we will assume, and indemnify New DuPont and Dow for, certain liabilities including, among others, certain environmental liabilities and litigation liabilities relating to our business and the discontinued and divested businesses and operations of Historical DuPont. Most of these indemnification obligations are uncapped, and may include, among other items, associated defense costs, settlement amounts and judgments. Payments pursuant to these indemnities may be significant and could negatively impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. For a discussion of these arrangements, including the indemnification arrangements, see the sections entitled Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Separation and Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution.
Regulatory Approvals
We must complete the necessary registration under U.S. federal securities laws of Corteva common stock to be issued in the distribution, as well as the applicable listing requirements of the for such shares.
Other than these requirements, we do not believe that any other material governmental or regulatory filings or approvals will be necessary to consummate the distribution.
DowDuPont stockholders will not have any appraisal rights in connection with the distribution.
Corporate Information
Corteva Parent was organized in the State of Delaware on March 16, 2018 as Corteva, Inc. EID was founded in 1802 and was incorporated in the state of Delaware in 1915. The current address of Cortevas principal executive offices is 974 Centre Road, Wilmington, Delaware 19805. Corteva can be contacted by calling (302) 774-1000.
10
SUMMARY OF THE SEPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION
The following is a summary of the material terms of the separation, distribution and other related transactions.
Distributing company |
DowDuPont Inc. |
Distributed company |
Corteva, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of DowDuPont that will be the holding company for DowDuPonts agriculture business. Following the distribution, Corteva will be an independent, publicly traded company. |
Distribution ratio |
Each DowDuPont stockholder will receive shares of Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock held on , 2019, the record date for the distribution. DowDuPont stockholders may also receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares, as described below. |
Distributed securities |
In the distribution, DowDuPont will distribute to DowDuPont stockholders all of the then issued and outstanding shares of Corteva common stock. Following the separation and distribution, Corteva will be a separate company, and New DuPont will not retain any ownership in Corteva. |
The actual number of shares of Corteva common stock that will be distributed will depend on the number of shares of DowDuPont common stock outstanding on the record date. |
Immediately following the distribution, DowDuPont stockholders will own shares in both Corteva and New DuPont. |
Fractional shares |
DowDuPont will not distribute any fractional shares of Corteva common stock. Instead, if you are a registered holder, , the distribution agent, will aggregate all fractional shares that would have otherwise been issued in the distribution into whole shares and sell the whole shares in the open market at prevailing market prices on behalf of all DowDuPont stockholders entitled to receive a fractional share. The distribution agent will then distribute the aggregate cash proceeds of the sales, net of brokerage fees and other costs, pro rata to those stockholders (net of any required withholding for taxes applicable to each stockholder) who otherwise would have been entitled to receive a fractional share in the distribution. DowDuPont stockholders who receive cash in lieu of fractional shares will not be entitled to any interest on amounts paid in lieu of fractional shares. Any cash received in lieu of fractional shares generally will be taxable to DowDuPont stockholders as described in the section entitled Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution. |
Record date |
The record date for the distribution is the close of business on , 2019. |
11
Distribution date |
The distribution date is expected to be on June 1, 2019. |
Distribution |
On the distribution date, DowDuPont will issue shares of Corteva common stock to all DowDuPont stockholders as of the record date based on the distribution ratio. The shares of Corteva common stock will be issued electronically in direct registration or book-entry form and no certificates will be issued. |
Commencing on or shortly following the distribution date, the distribution agent will mail to stockholders who hold their shares directly with DowDuPont (registered holders) a direct registration account statement that reflects the shares of Corteva common stock that have been registered in their name. |
For shares of DowDuPont common stock that are held through a bank, the bank will credit the stockholders account with the Corteva common stock they are entitled to receive in the distribution. |
DowDuPont stockholders will not be required to make any payment, to surrender or exchange their shares of DowDuPont common stock or to take any other action to receive their shares of Corteva common stock in the distribution. |
If you are a DowDuPont stockholder on the record date and decide to sell your shares on or before the distribution date, you may choose to sell your DowDuPont common stock with or without your entitlement to receive Corteva common stock in the distribution. Beginning on or shortly before the record date and continuing through the last trading day prior to the distribution, it is expected that there will be two markets in DowDuPont common stock: a regular-way market and an ex-distribution market. Shares of DowDuPont common stock that are traded in the regular-way market will trade with the entitlement to receive the Corteva common stock that is distributed pursuant to the distribution. Shares that trade in the ex-distribution market will trade without the entitlement to receive the shares of Corteva common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. Consequently, if you sell your shares of DowDuPont common stock in the regular-way market on or prior to the last trading day prior to the distribution date, you will also be selling your right to receive Corteva common stock in the distribution. |
Conditions to the distribution |
The distribution is subject to the satisfaction of the following conditions, among other conditions described in this information statement: |
|
The SEC having declared effective the Form 10 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), no stop order relating to the Form 10 being in effect, no proceedings seeking such a stop order being pending before or threatened by the SEC and this information statement having been distributed to DowDuPont stockholders; |
12
|
the listing of Corteva common stock on the having been approved, subject to official notice of issuance; |
|
the DowDuPont board of directors having received an opinion from to the effect that, following the distribution, Corteva and DowDuPont will each be solvent and adequately capitalized, and that DowDuPont has adequate surplus under Delaware law to declare the dividend of Corteva common stock; |
|
the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment as they relate to Corteva having been effectuated prior to the distribution date; |
|
the DowDuPont board of directors having declared the dividend of Corteva common stock to effect the distribution and having approved the distribution and all related transactions, which approval may be given or withheld in the boards absolute and sole discretion (and such declaration or approval not having been withdrawn); |
|
DowDuPont having elected the individuals to be members of our board of directors following the distribution, and certain directors as set forth in the separation agreement having resigned from the DowDuPont board of directors; |
|
each of us, DowDuPont and Dow and each of our or their applicable subsidiaries having entered into all ancillary agreements to which it and/or any such subsidiary is contemplated to be a party; |
|
no events or developments having occurred or existing that make it inadvisable to effect the distribution or that would result in the distribution and related transactions not being in the best interest of DowDuPont or its stockholders; |
|
no order, injunction or decree by any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing consummation of the distribution or any of the related transactions, including the transfers of assets and liabilities contemplated by the separation agreement, shall be pending, threatened, issued or in effect; |
|
the receipt by DowDuPont of an opinion of Skadden, in form and substance satisfactory to DowDuPont (in its sole discretion) (the Tax Opinion), substantially to the effect that, among other things, the distribution, together with certain related transactions, will qualify as a tax-free transaction under Section 355 and Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), for U.S. federal income tax purposes; and |
|
the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) not having revoked the IRS Ruling (as described in the section entitled Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Separation). |
13
The fulfillment of these conditions does not create any obligation on DowDuPonts part to effect the distribution, and the DowDuPont board of directors has the ability, in its sole discretion, to amend, modify or abandon the distribution and related transactions at any time prior to the distribution date. |
Stock exchange listing |
We intend to file an application to list the shares of Corteva common stock on the under the symbol . |
We anticipate that as early as the trading prior to the record date, trading in shares of Corteva common stock will begin on a when-issued basis and that this when-issued trading market will continue through the last trading day prior to the distribution date. See the section entitled The DistributionTrading Between the Record Date and Distribution Date. |
Transfer agent
Cortevas indebtedness |
For additional information relating to our anticipated indebtedness following the separation and distribution, see the section entitled Description of Material Indebtedness included elsewhere in this information statement. |
Risks relating to Corteva, ownership of Corteva common stock and the distribution |
Our business is subject to both general and specific risks, including risks relating to our business, to our relationship with New DuPont and Dow following the separation and distribution and to us being a separate, publicly traded company. You should read carefully the section entitled Risk Factors. |
Tax considerations |
Assuming the distribution, together with certain related transactions, qualifies as a tax-free transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Section 368(a)(1)(D) and Section 355 of the Code, no gain or loss will be recognized by DowDuPont stockholders, and no amount will be included in the income of a DowDuPont stockholder, upon the receipt of shares of Corteva common stock pursuant to the distribution. However, any cash payments made in lieu of fractional shares will generally be taxable to the stockholder. For a more detailed description, see the section entitled Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution. |
Certain agreements with DowDuPont and Dow |
Substantially simultaneously with the distribution of Dow, we will enter into the separation agreement with DowDuPont (which will, after the separation of Corteva, become New DuPont) and Dow to effect the separation and distribution and provide a framework for our relationship with New DuPont and Dow after the separation and distribution. We also intend to enter into various other agreements |
14
with DowDuPont and Dow, including a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, intellectual property cross-license agreements, trademark license agreements and certain other intellectual property, services, supply and real-estate agreements. These agreements will provide, among other things, for the allocation among us, New DuPont and Dow of the assets, liabilities and obligations of DowDuPont (including its investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after Dows and our respective separations from DowDuPont and will govern certain relationships among us, New DuPont and Dow. For a discussion of these arrangements, see the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution. |
15
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE SEPARATION AND DISTRIBUTION
What is Corteva and why is DowDuPont separating
|
Prior to the completion of the Merger on August 31, 2017, each of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow was a standalone, publicly traded company. Historical DuPont operated a global business that included agriculture, electronics and communications, industrial biosciences, nutrition and health, performance materials and protection solutions segments. Historical Dow operated a global business that included agriculture sciences, consumer solutions, infrastructure solutions, performance materials and chemicals and performance plastics segments. |
As a result of the Merger, each of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow became a subsidiary of DowDuPont. In connection with their entry into the merger agreement, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow announced their intention to pursue the separation of DowDuPont into three independent, publicly traded companiesone for each of the combined companys agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesses, subject to the approval of the DowDuPont board of directors and any required regulatory approvals. |
The separation of DowDuPonts agriculture business, Corteva, is the second step in this process and is expected to be preceded by the distribution of Dow, DowDuPonts materials science business. In connection with the separation of DowDuPonts businesses, DowDuPont will undertake the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment, such that, at the time of distribution, Corteva will hold, directly or indirectly, DowDuPonts agriculture business. Corteva Parent is a newly formed holding company for Corteva and the separation will be effected by way of a pro rata dividend of Corteva common stock to DowDuPont stockholders. Following the separation and distribution, Corteva will be a separate company, and the remaining company will not retain any ownership interest in Corteva. |
The separations of Dow and us from DowDuPont and the distributions of Dow common stock and Corteva common stock are each intended to provide DowDuPont stockholders with equity investments in separate companies that will be able to focus their respective businesses, with Corteva being a leading, pure-play agriculture company. The separations are expected to enhance the long-term performance of each business for the reasons discussed in the sections entitled The DistributionBackground of the Distribution and The DistributionReasons for the Separation and Distribution. |
Why am I receiving this document? |
We are delivering this document to you because you are a DowDuPont stockholder as of the close of business on , |
16
2019, the record date for the distribution. As a DowDuPont stockholder as of the record date, you are entitled to receive shares of Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock that you hold at the close of business on such date. This document will help you understand how the separation and distribution will affect your investment in DowDuPont and your investment in Corteva after the separation. |
What are the reasons for the separation? |
The DowDuPont board of directors believes that the separation of DowDuPont into three, independent, publicly traded companies through the separation of DowDuPonts agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesses is in the best interests of DowDuPont and its stockholders and is the best available opportunity to unlock the value of DowDuPonts business. |
The DowDuPont board of directors, in consultation with its advisory committees (as described in the section entitled The DistributionBackground of the Distribution), considered a wide variety of factors in evaluating the planned separations and distributions and in deciding to proceed with the distributions, including the risk that one or more of the distributions is abandoned and not completed. Among other things, the DowDuPont board of directors and its advisory committees considered the following potential benefits of the separations and distributions: |
|
Attractive Investment Profile . The creation of separate companies with strong, focused businesses and each with a distinct financial profile and clear investment thesis is expected to drive significant long-term value for all stockholders and reduce the complexities surrounding investor understanding, enabling investors to invest in each company separately based on its distinct characteristics. |
|
Enhanced Means to Evaluate Financial Performance . Investors should be better able to evaluate the business condition, strategy and financial performance of each company within the context of its industry and markets. It is believed that, over time following the completion of the separations, the aggregate market value of Corteva, Dow and New DuPont will be higher, on a fully distributed basis and assuming the same market conditions, than if DowDuPont were to remain under its current configuration. |
|
Distinct Position . The separations are expected to create three independent companies with tailored growth strategies and differentiated technologies, resulting in: Corteva, a leading global agricultural company with one of the most comprehensive and diverse portfolios in the industry; Dow, a leading global materials science company that will be a low-cost, innovation-driven leader; and New DuPont, a leading global specialty |
17
products company that will be a technology driven innovation leader. Each company will provide investors with a distinct investment option that may be more attractive to current investors and will allow the company to attract different investors than the current investment option available to DowDuPont stockholders of one combined company. |
|
Focused Capital Allocation . Each independent, publicly traded company will have a capital structure that is expected to be best suited to its specific needs and will be able to make capital allocation decisions that better align with its streamlined business. In addition, after the separations, the respective businesses within each company will no longer need to compete internally for capital and other corporate resources with businesses allocated to another company. |
|
Ability to Adapt to Industry Changes . Each company is expected to be able to maintain a sharper focus on its core business and growth opportunities, which will allow each company to respond better and more quickly to developments in its industry. |
|
Dedicated Management Team with Enhanced Strategic Focus . Each companys management team will be able to design and implement corporate policies and strategies that are tailored to such companys specific business characteristics and to focus on maximizing the value of its business. |
|
Improved Management Incentive Tools . The separation will permit the creation of equity securities, including options and restricted stock units, for each publicly traded company with values more closely linked to the performance of such companys business than would be readily available under the current configuration of businesses within DowDuPont as a single public company. The DowDuPont board of directors believes such equity-based compensation arrangements should provide enhanced incentives for performance and improve the ability for each publicly traded company to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. |
|
Direct Access to Capital Markets and Ability to Pursue Strategic Opportunities . Each companys business will have direct access to the capital markets, and is expected to be better situated to pursue future acquisitions, joint ventures and other strategic opportunities as well as internal expansion that is more closely aligned with such companys strategic goals and expected growth opportunities. |
The DowDuPont board of directors also considered a number of potentially negative factors, including the loss of synergies and joint purchasing power from ceasing to operate as part of a larger, more diversified company, risks relating to the creation of a new public company, such as increased costs from operating as a separate public company, potential disruptions to the businesses and loss or dilution |
18
of brand identities, possible increased administrative costs and one-time separation costs, restrictions on each companys ability to pursue certain opportunities that may have otherwise been available in order to preserve the tax-free nature of the distributions and related transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the fact that each company will be less diversified than the current configuration of DowDuPonts businesses prior to the separations and distributions, and the potential inability to realize the anticipated benefits of the separations. |
The DowDuPont board of directors concluded that the potential benefits of pursuing each separation and each distribution outweighed the potentially negative factors in connection therewith. For more information, see the sections entitled The DistributionReasons for the Separation and Distribution and Risk Factors. |
The DowDuPont board of directors also considered these potential benefits and potentially negative factors in light of the risk that one or more of the distributions is abandoned or otherwise not completed, resulting in DowDuPont separating into fewer than the intended three separate publicly traded companies. The DowDuPont board of directors believes that the potential benefits to DowDuPont stockholders discussed above apply to the separation of each of the intended three businesses and that the creation of each independent company, with its distinctive business and capital structure and ability to focus on its specific growth plan, will provide DowDuPont stockholders with greater long-term value than retaining one investment in the combined company. |
Why is the separation of Corteva structured as a distribution? |
DowDuPont currently believes the separation by way of distribution is the most efficient way to separate its agriculture business from DowDuPont for various reasons, including that a separation will (i) offer a high degree of certainty of completion in a timely manner, lessening disruption to current business operations; (ii) provide a high degree of assurance that decisions regarding Cortevas capital structure will align with its business objectives and provide the continued financial flexibility and financial stability to support its long-term growth and generate stockholder returns; and (iii) generally be a tax-free distribution of shares of Corteva common stock to DowDuPont stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes (except for any cash received in lieu of fractional shares). DowDuPont believes that a tax-free separation will enhance the value of both DowDuPont and Corteva. See the section entitled The DistributionReasons for the Separation and Distribution. |
What do I have to do to participate in the
|
You are not required to take any action to receive your Corteva common stock, although you are urged to read this entire document carefully. No approval of the distribution by DowDuPont |
19
stockholders is required and DowDuPont is not seeking your approval. Therefore, Corteva is not asking you for a proxy to vote on the separation or the distribution, and Corteva requests that you do not send Corteva a proxy . You will not be required to pay anything for the shares of Corteva common stock you will receive in the distribution nor will you be required to surrender or exchange any shares of DowDuPont common stock to participate in the distribution. |
What is the record date for the distribution? |
DowDuPont will determine record ownership as of the close of business on , 2019, which we refer to as the record date. |
What will happen to my shares of EID Preferred Stock? |
Nothing. EID will continue to be a subsidiary of Corteva Parent and will remain a reporting issuer with the SEC. The EID Preferred Stock will be unaffected by the separation and distribution. |
What will I receive in distribution? |
If you hold DowDuPont common stock as of the record date, on the distribution date you will receive shares of Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock you held on the record date, as well as a cash payment in lieu of any fractional shares (as discussed below). You will receive only whole shares of Corteva common stock in the distribution. For a more detailed description, see the section entitled The Distribution. |
How will fractional shares be treated in the distribution? |
No fractional shares of Corteva common stock will be distributed. Consequently, you will not receive any fractional shares of Corteva common stock and instead will receive a cash payment in lieu of any fractional shares you would otherwise have been entitled to receive in the distribution. |
DowDuPont has engaged as its distribution agent. The distribution agent will aggregate all fractional shares that would have otherwise been issued in the distribution into whole shares and will sell the whole shares in the open market at prevailing market prices on behalf of all DowDuPont stockholders entitled to receive a fractional share. The distribution agent will then distribute the aggregate cash proceeds of the sales, net of brokerage fees and other costs, pro rata to those stockholders (net of any required withholding for taxes applicable to such stockholder). You will not be entitled to any interest on the amount of payment made to you in lieu of fractional shares. |
Will the number of DowDuPont shares I own change as a result of the distribution? |
No, the number of shares you own will not change as a result of the distribution. Immediately following the distribution, you will hold the same number of shares of DowDuPont (which will, after the separation of Corteva, become New DuPont) that you held |
20
immediately prior to the distribution. Your proportionate interest will also not change, so you will own the same proportionate amount of New DuPont immediately following the separation and distribution that you owned of DowDuPont immediately prior to the separation and distribution. |
How many shares of Corteva common stock will be distributed? |
The actual number of shares of Corteva common stock that will be distributed will depend on the number of shares of DowDuPont common stock outstanding on the record date. The shares of Corteva common stock that are distributed will constitute all the then issued and outstanding shares of Corteva common stock immediately prior to the distribution and DowDuPont (which will, after the separation of Corteva, become New DuPont) will not retain any ownership interest in Corteva following the distribution. For a more detailed description, see the section entitled Description of Our Capital Stock. |
When will the distribution occur? |
It is expected that the distribution will be effected prior to the opening of trading on the distribution date, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions. On or shortly after the distribution date, the whole shares of Corteva common stock will be credited in book-entry accounts for each stockholder entitled to receive the shares of Corteva common stock in the distribution. We expect DowDuPonts distribution agent to take approximately two weeks after the distribution date to fully distribute to stockholders any cash they are entitled to receive in lieu of fractional shares. See How will I receive my shares of Corteva common stock? for more information. |
If I sell my shares of DowDuPont common stock
|
If you are a DowDuPont stockholder on the record date and decide to sell your shares before the distribution date, you may choose to sell your DowDuPont common stock with or without your entitlement to receive Corteva common stock in the distribution. Beginning on or shortly before the record date and continuing through the distribution, it is expected that there will be two markets in DowDuPont common stock: a regular-way market and an ex-distribution market. Shares of DowDuPont common stock that are traded in the regular-way market will trade with the entitlement to receive the Corteva common stock that is distributed pursuant to the distribution. Shares that trade in the ex-distribution market will trade without the entitlement to receive the shares of Corteva common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. Consequently, if you sell your shares of DowDuPont common stock in the regular-way market on or prior to the last trading day prior to the distribution date, you are also selling your right to receive Corteva common stock in the distribution. |
21
You should discuss these alternatives with your bank, broker or other nominee. See the section entitled The DistributionTrading Between the Record Date and Distribution Date. |
How will I receive my shares of Corteva common stock? |
Registered stockholders: If you are a registered stockholder (meaning you own your shares of DowDuPont common stock directly through an account with DowDuPonts transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., (Computershare)), the distribution agent will credit the whole shares of Corteva common stock you receive in the distribution to your book-entry account with our transfer agent on or shortly after the distribution date. Approximately two weeks after the distribution date, the distribution agent will mail you a book-entry account statement that reflects the number of whole shares of Corteva common stock you own, along with a check for any cash in lieu of fractional shares you are entitled to receive. |
Beneficial stockholders: If you own your shares of DowDuPont common stock beneficially through a bank, broker or other nominee, your bank, broker or other nominee will credit your account with the whole shares of Corteva common stock you receive in the distribution on or shortly after the distribution date. Your bank, broker or other nominee will also be responsible for transmitting to you any cash payment you are entitled to receive in lieu of fractional shares. Please contact your bank, broker or other nominee for further information about your account and the payment of any cash you are entitled to receive in lieu of fractional shares. |
The shares of Corteva common stock will not be certificated. As a result, no physical stock certificates will be issued to any stockholders. See the section entitled The DistributionWhen and How You Will Receive the Distribution for a more detailed explanation. |
What are the conditions to the distribution? |
The distribution is subject to several conditions, including, among others: |
|
the SEC having declared effective the Form 10 under the Exchange Act, no stop order relating to the Form 10 being in effect, no proceedings seeking such stop order is pending before or threatened by the SEC and this information statement having been distributed to DowDuPont stockholders; |
|
the listing of Corteva common stock on the having been approved, subject to official notice of issuance; |
|
the DowDuPont board of directors having received an opinion from to the effect that, following the distribution, we and DowDuPont will each be solvent and adequately capitalized, and that DowDuPont has adequate |
22
surplus under Delaware law to declare the dividend of Corteva common stock; |
|
the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment as they relate to us having been effectuated prior to the distribution date; |
|
the DowDuPont board of directors having declared the dividend of Corteva common stock to effect the distribution and having approved the distribution and all related transactions, which approval may be given or withheld in the boards absolute and sole discretion (and such declaration or approval not having been withdrawn); |
|
DowDuPont having elected the individuals to be the members of our board of directors following the distribution, and certain directors as set forth in the separation agreement having resigned from the DowDuPont board of directors; |
|
each of us, DowDuPont and Dow and each of our and their applicable subsidiaries having entered into all ancillary agreements to which it and/or such subsidiary is contemplated to be a party; |
|
no events or developments having occurred or existing that make it inadvisable to effect the distribution or that would result in the distribution and related transactions not being in the best interest of DowDuPont or its stockholders; |
|
no order, injunction or decree by any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing consummation of the distribution or any of the related transactions, including the transfers of assets and liabilities contemplated by the separation agreement, shall be pending, threatened, issued or in effect; |
|
the receipt by DowDuPont of the Tax Opinion; and |
|
the IRS not having revoked the IRS Ruling (as described in the section entitled Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Separation). |
The fulfillment of these conditions does not create any obligation on DowDuPonts part to effect the distribution, and the DowDuPont board of directors has the ability, in its sole discretion, to amend, modify or abandon the distribution and related transactions at any time prior to the distribution date |
Can DowDuPont decide to cancel the distribution even if all the conditions have been met? |
Yes. The distribution is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. See the section entitled The DistributionConditions to the Distribution. Even if all such conditions are met, DowDuPont has the ability, in its sole discretion, not to complete the distribution if, at any time prior to the distribution, the DowDuPont board of |
23
directors determines, in its sole discretion, that the distribution is not in the best interests of DowDuPont or its stockholders, that a sale or other alternative is in the best interests of DowDuPont or its stockholders, or that market conditions or other circumstances are such that it is not advisable at that time to separate the agriculture business from DowDuPont. |
What are the U.S. federal income tax consequences
|
The distribution is conditioned on the continued validity of the IRS Ruling, which DowDuPont has received from the IRS, and the receipt of the Tax Opinion, in form and substance acceptable to DowDuPont, substantially to the effect that, among other things, the distribution, together with certain related transactions, will qualify as a tax-free transaction under Section 355 and Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. Assuming the distribution so qualifies, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, no gain or loss will be recognized by you, and no amount will be included in your income, upon the receipt of shares of Corteva common stock pursuant to the distribution. However, any cash payments made instead of fractional shares will generally be taxable to you. For a more detailed description, see the section entitled Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution. |
How will the distribution affect my tax basis in my shares of DowDuPont common stock? |
Assuming that the distribution is tax-free to DowDuPont stockholders (except for taxes related to any cash received in lieu of fractional shares), your tax basis in the DowDuPont common stock held by you immediately prior to the distribution will be allocated between your shares of DowDuPont common stock and the Corteva common stock that you receive in the distribution in proportion to the relative fair market values of each immediately following the distribution. For a more detailed description, see the section entitled Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution. |
Will my shares of DowDuPont common stock continue to trade following the distribution? |
Your DowDuPont common stock, which will now represent ownership of New DuPont, will continue to trade on the NYSE. |
How will the distributions affect the operations of DowDuPont? |
It is expected that after the distribution of Corteva, DowDuPont will be renamed . The remaining company will continue to operate the specialty products business of DowDuPont. |
How will Corteva common stock trade? |
Corteva common stock will trade on the under the symbol . |
24
We anticipate that trading in Corteva common stock will begin on a when-issued basis as early as the trading day prior to the record date for the distribution and will continue through the last trading day prior to the distribution date. When-issued trading in the context of a separation refers to a sale or purchase made conditionally on or before the distribution date because the securities of the separated entity have not yet been distributed. When-issued trades generally settle within two weeks after the distribution date. On the distribution date any when-issued trading of Corteva common stock will end and regular-way trading will begin. Regular-way trading refers to trading after the security has been distributed and typically involves a trade that settles on the second full trading day following the date of the trade. See the section entitled The DistributionTrading Between the Record Date and Distribution Date. We cannot predict the trading prices for Corteva common stock before, on or after the distribution date. |
What indebtedness will Corteva have following the separation? |
At the time of the separation, we expect to have approximately $ billion of indebtedness. See the sections entitled Description of Material Indebtedness and Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Information for more information. |
Will the separations affect the trading price of my DowDuPont common stock? |
We expect the trading price of shares of New DuPont common stock immediately following the distribution to be lower than the trading price of DowDuPont common stock immediately prior to the distribution because the trading price will no longer reflect the value of the agriculture business. Furthermore, until the market has fully analyzed the value of New DuPont without Corteva and Dow (whose distribution is expected to precede ours) and the value of Corteva or Dow as standalone companies, the trading price of shares of all three companies may fluctuate. There can be no assurance that, following the distributions, the combined trading prices of the common stock of us, Dow and New DuPont will equal or exceed what the trading price of DowDuPont common stock would have been in the absence of DowDuPonts pursuit of the separations, and it is possible the aggregate equity value of the three independent companies will be less than DowDuPonts equity value prior to the distribution of Dow and us. |
Are there risks associated with owning shares of Corteva common stock? |
Yes. Our business is subject to both general and specific risks, including risks relating to our business, our relationship with New DuPont and Dow following the separation and distribution and of us being a separate, publicly traded company. Accordingly, you should read carefully the information set forth in the section entitled Risk Factors in this information statement. |
25
Does Corteva intend to pay cash dividends? |
We expect that we will pay a quarterly dividend following the distribution. The declaration, payment and amount of any dividends following the distribution will be subject to the sole discretion of our post-distribution, independent board of directors and, in the context of our financial policy, will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition and prospects, our capital requirements and access to capital markets, covenants associated with certain of our debt obligations, legal requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant, and there can be no assurances that we will continue to pay a dividend in the future. There can also be no assurance that, after the distribution, the combined annual dividends, if any, on the common stock of us, New DuPont and Dow, if any, will be equal to the annual dividends on DowDuPont common stock prior to the distribution of Dow and Corteva common stock. |
What will Cortevas relationship be with New DuPont and Dow following the separation and distribution? |
We will enter into the separation agreement with DowDuPont and Dow to effect the separation (including the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment) and distribution of Dow and Corteva. We will also enter into certain other agreements with DowDuPont and Dow, including a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, intellectual property cross-license agreements, trademark license agreements and certain other intellectual property, services, supply and real estate-related agreements. These agreements will collectively provide for the terms of the allocation among us, New DuPont and Dow of the assets, liabilities and obligations of DowDuPont and its subsidiaries (including its investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) and will govern the relationship among us, New DuPont and Dow subsequent to the completion of the separations and distributions. For additional information regarding the separation agreement and other transaction agreements, see the sections entitled Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Separation and Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution. |
Do I have appraisal rights in connection with the separation and distribution? |
DowDuPont stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the separation and distribution. |
Who is the transfer agent and registrar for Corteva common stock? |
Following the separation and distribution, will serve as transfer agent and registrar for Corteva common stock. |
Computershare currently serves as DowDuPonts transfer agent and registrar. In addition, will serve as the distribution agent in the distribution and will assist DowDuPont in the distribution of Corteva common stock to DowDuPont stockholders. |
26
Where can I get more information? |
If you have any questions relating to the mechanics of the distribution, you should contact the distribution agent at: |
Before the separation and distribution, if you have any questions relating to Corteva, you should contact Corteva at: |
Investor Relations |
Before the separation and distribution, if you have any questions relating to DowDuPont, you should contact DowDuPont at:
Investor Relations |
(for Institutional Holders) |
(for Individual Holders) |
After the separation and distribution, if you have any questions relating to New DuPont, you should contact New DuPont at: |
Investor Relations |
1-302-774-4994 (for Institutional Holders) |
1-302-774-3034 (for Individual Holders) |
27
You should carefully consider the following risks and other information in this information statement in evaluating us and Corteva common stock. The risk factors generally have been separated into three groups: risks related to our business, risks related to the separation and risks related to Corteva common stock.
Any of the following risks, as well as additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. Our operations could be affected by various risks, many of which are beyond our control. Based on current information, we believe that the following identifies the most significant risks that could affect our business, results of operations or financial condition. Past financial performance may not be a reliable indicator of future performance and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or trends in future periods. See the section entitled Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements for more details.
Risks Related to Our Business
We participate in an industry that is highly competitive and has undergone consolidation, which could increase competitive pressures.
We currently face significant competition in the markets in which we operate. In most segments of the market, the number of products available to the grower is steadily increasing as new products are introduced. At the same time, certain products are coming off patent and are thus available to generic manufacturers for production and commercialization. Finally, data analytic tools and web-based new direct purchase models offer increased transparency and comparability, which creates price pressures. As a result, we anticipate that we will continue to face significant competitive challenges.
The successful development and commercialization of our pipeline products will be necessary for our growth.
We use advanced breeding technologies to produce hybrids and varieties with superior performance in farmers fields, and we use biotechnology to introduce traits that enhance specific characteristics of our crops. We also use advanced analytics, software tools, mobile communications and new planting and monitoring equipment to provide agronomic recommendations to growers. Additionally, we conduct research into biological and chemical products to protect farmers crops from pests and diseases and enhance plant productivity.
New product concepts may be abandoned for many reasons, including greater anticipated development costs, technical difficulties, lack of efficacy, regulatory obstacles or inability to market under regulatory frameworks, competition, inability to prove the original concept, lack of demand and the need to divert focus, from time to time, to other initiatives with perceived opportunities for better returns. The processes of active ingredient development or discovery, breeding, biotechnology trait discovery and development and trait integration are lengthy, and a very small percentage of the chemicals, genes and germplasm we test is selected for commercialization. Furthermore, the length of time and the risk associated with the breeding and biotech pipelines are interlinked because both are required as a package for commercial success in markets where biotech traits are approved for growers. In countries where biotech traits are not approved for widespread use, our seed sales depend on the quality of our germplasm.
Speed in discovering, developing, protecting and responding to new technologies, including new technology-based distribution channels that could facilitate our ability to engage with customers and end users, and bringing related products to market is a significant competitive advantage. Commercial success frequently depends on being the first company to the market, and many of our competitors are also making considerable investments in similar new biotechnology products, improved germplasm products, biological and chemical products and agronomic recommendation products.
28
We may not be able to obtain or maintain the necessary regulatory approvals for some of our products, including our seed and crop protection products, which could restrict our ability to sell those products in some markets.
Regulatory and legislative requirements affect the development, manufacture and distribution of our products, including the testing and planting of seeds containing our biotechnology traits and the import of crops grown from those seeds, and non-compliance can harm our sales and profitability.
Seed products incorporating biotechnology derived traits and crop protection products must be extensively tested for safety, efficacy and environmental impact before they can be registered for production, use, sale or commercialization in a given market. In certain jurisdictions, we must periodically renew our approvals for both biotechnology and crop protection products, which typically require us to demonstrate compliance with then-current standards which generally are more stringent since the prior registration. The regulatory approvals process is lengthy, costly, complex and in some markets unpredictable, with requirements that can vary by product, technology, industry and country. The regulatory approvals process for products that incorporate novel modes of action or new technologies can be particularly unpredictable and uncertain due to the then-current state of regulatory guidelines and objectives, as well as governmental policy considerations and non-governmental organization and other stakeholder considerations.
Furthermore, the detection of biotechnology traits or chemical residues from a crop protection product not approved in the country in which we sell or cultivate our product, or in a country to which we import our product, may affect our ability to supply our products or export our products, or even result in crop destruction, product recalls or trade disruption, which could result in lawsuits and termination of licenses related to biotechnology traits and raw material supply agreements. Delays in obtaining regulatory approvals to import, including those related to the importation of crops grown from seeds containing certain traits or treated with specific chemicals, may influence the rate of adoption of new products in globally traded crops.
Additionally, the regulatory environment may be impacted by the activities of non-governmental organizations and special interest groups and stakeholder reaction to actual or perceived impacts of new and existing technology, products or processes on safety, health and the environment. Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approvals requires submitting a significant amount of information and data, which may require participation from technology providers. Regulatory standards and trial procedures are continuously changing. In addition, we have seen an increase in recent years in the number of lawsuits filed by those who identify themselves as public or environmental interest groups seeking to invalidate pesticide product registrations and/or challenge the way federal or state governmental entities apply the rules and regulations governing pesticide produce use. The pace of change together with the lack of regulatory harmony could result in unintended noncompliance. Responding to these changes and meeting existing and new requirements may involve significant costs or capital expenditures or require changes in business practice that could result in reduced profitability. The failure to receive necessary permits or approvals could have near- and long-term effects on our ability to produce and sell some current and future products.
Enforcing our intellectual property rights, or defending against intellectual property claims asserted by others, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Intellectual property rights, including patents, plant variety protection, trade secrets, confidential information, trademarks, tradenames and other forms of trade dress, are important to our business. We endeavor to protect our intellectual property rights in jurisdictions in which our products are produced or used and in jurisdictions into which our products are imported. However, we may be unable to obtain protection for our intellectual property in key jurisdictions. Further, changes in government policies and regulations, including changes made in reaction to pressure from non-governmental organizations, or the public generally, could impact the extent of intellectual property protection afforded by such jurisdictions.
We have designed and implemented internal controls to restrict access to and distribution of our intellectual property. Despite these precautions, our intellectual property is vulnerable to unauthorized access through
29
employee error or actions, theft and cybersecurity incidents, and other security breaches. When unauthorized access and use or counterfeit products are discovered, we report such situations to governmental authorities for investigation, as appropriate, and take measures to mitigate any potential impact. Protecting intellectual property related to biotechnology is particularly challenging because theft is difficult to detect and biotechnology can be self-replicating. Accordingly, the impact of such theft can be significant.
Competitors are increasingly challenging intellectual property positions and the outcomes can be highly uncertain. Third parties may claim our products violate their intellectual property rights. Defending such claims, even those without merit, could be time-consuming and expensive. In addition, any such claim could result in our having to enter into license agreements, develop non-infringing products or engage in litigation that could be costly. If challenges are resolved adversely, it could negatively impact our ability to obtain licenses on competitive terms, commercialize new products and generate sales from existing products.
In addition, because of the rapid pace of technological change, the confidentiality of patent applications in some jurisdictions and/or the uncertainty in predicting the outcome of complex proceedings relating to ownership or protection scope of patents relating to certain emerging technologies, competitors may be issued patents unexpected by us. These patents could reduce the value of our commercial or pipeline products or, to the extent they cover key technologies on which we have unknowingly relied, require us to seek to obtain licenses or cease using the technology, no matter how valuable to our business. We cannot ensure we would be able to obtain such a license on acceptable terms.
Legislation and jurisprudence on patent protection is evolving and changes in laws could affect our ability to obtain or maintain patent protection for our products.
Our business may be adversely affected by competition from manufacturers of generic products.
Competition from manufacturers of generic products is a challenge for our branded products around the world, and the loss or expiration of intellectual property rights can have a significant adverse effect on our revenues. The date at which generic competition commences may be different from the date that the patent or regulatory exclusivity expires. However, upon the loss or expiration of patent protection for one of our products or of a product that we license, or upon the at-risk launch (despite pending patent infringement litigation against the generic product) by a generic manufacturer of a generic version of one of our patented products or of a product that we license, we can lose a major portion of revenues for that product, which can adversely affect our business.
We are dependent on our relationships or contracts with third parties with respect to certain of our raw materials or licenses and commercialization.
We are dependent on third-parties in the research, development and commercialization of our products and enter into transactions including, but not limited to, supply agreements and licensing agreements in connection with our business. The majority of our corn hybrids and soybean varieties sold to customers contain biotechnology traits that we license from third parties under long-term licenses. If we lose our rights under such licenses, it could negatively impact our ability to obtain future licenses on competitive terms, commercialize new products and generate sales from existing products. To maintain such licenses, we may elect to out-license our technology, including germplasm. There can be no guarantee that such out-licensing will not ultimately strengthen our competition thereby adversely impacting our results of operations.
While we rely heavily on third parties for multiple aspects of our business and commercialization activities, we do not control many aspects of such third parties activities. Third parties may not complete activities on schedule or in accordance with our expectations. Failure by one or more of these third parties to meet their contractual or other obligations to us, failure of one or more of these parties to comply with applicable laws or regulations, or any disruption in the relationship between us and one or more of these third parties could delay or
30
prevent the development, approval or commercialization of our products and could also result in non-compliance or reputational harm, all with potential negative implications for our business.
In addition, our agreements with third parties may obligate us to meet certain contractual or other obligations to third parties. For example, we may be obligated to meet certain thresholds or abide by certain boundary conditions. If we were to fail to meet such obligations to the third parties, our relationship with such third parties may be disrupted. Such a disruption could negatively impact certain of our licenses on which we depend, could cause reputational harm, and could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The costs of complying with evolving regulatory requirements could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition. Actual or alleged violations of environmental laws or permit requirements could result in restrictions or prohibitions on plant operations, substantial civil or criminal sanctions, as well as the assessment of strict liability and/or joint and several liability.
We are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws, regulations, rules and ordinances relating to pollution, protection of the environment, waste water discharges, the generation, storage, handling, transportation, treatment, disposal and remediation of hazardous substances and waste materials and the use of genetically modified seeds and crop protection active ingredients by growers.
Environmental and health and safety laws, regulations and standards expose us to the risk of substantial costs and liabilities, including liabilities associated with our business and the discontinued and divested businesses and operations of Historical DuPont. As is typical for businesses such as ours, soil and groundwater contamination has occurred in the past at certain sites, and may be identified at other sites in the future. Disposal of waste from our business at off-site locations also exposes us to potential remediation costs. Consistent with past practice, we are continuing to monitor, investigate and remediate soil and groundwater contamination at several of these sites.
Costs and capital expenditures relating to environmental, health or safety matters are subject to evolving regulatory requirements and depend on the timing of the promulgation and enforcement of specific standards which impose the requirements. Moreover, changes in environmental regulations could inhibit or interrupt our operations, or require modifications to our facilities. Accordingly, environmental, health or safety regulatory matters could result in significant unanticipated costs or liabilities, which may be materially higher than our accruals.
The degree of public understanding and acceptance or perceived public acceptance of our biotechnology and other agricultural products and technologies can affect our sales and results of operations by affecting planting approvals, regulatory requirements and customer purchase decisions.
Concerns and claims regarding the safe use of seeds with biotechnology traits and crop protection products in general, their potential impact on health and the environment, and the perceived impacts of biotechnology on health and the environment, reflect a growing trend in societal demands for increasing levels of product safety and environmental protection. These include concerns and claims that increased use of crop protection products, related drift, inversion and volatilization, and the use of biotechnology traits meant to reduce the resistance of weeds or pests to control by crop protection products, could increase or accelerate such resistance and otherwise negatively impact health and the environment. These and other concerns could manifest themselves in stockholder proposals, preferred purchasing, delays or failures in obtaining or retaining regulatory approvals, delayed product launches, lack of market acceptance, product discontinuation, continued pressure for and adoption of more stringent regulatory intervention and litigation, termination of raw material supply agreements and legal claims. These and other concerns could also influence public perceptions, the viability or continued sales of certain of our products, our reputation and the cost to comply with regulations. As a result, such concerns could have a negative impact on our results of operations.
31
Changes in agricultural and related policies of governments and international organizations may prove unfavorable.
In many markets there are various pressures to reduce government subsidies to farmers, which may inhibit the growth in these markets of products used in agriculture. In addition, government programs that create incentives for farmers (for example, the U.S. Renewable Fuel Standard) may be modified or discontinued. However, it is difficult to predict accurately whether, and if so when, such changes will occur. We expect that the policies of governments and international organizations will continue to affect the planting choices made by growers as well as the income available to growers to purchase products used in agriculture and, accordingly, the operating results of the agriculture industry.
Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected by disruptions to our supply chain, information technology or network systems.
Business and/or supply chain disruptions, plant and/or power outages and information technology system and/or network disruptions, regardless of cause including acts of sabotage, employee error or other actions, geo-political activity, weather events and natural disasters could seriously harm our operations as well as the operations of our customers and suppliers. For example, a pandemic in locations where we have significant operations or sales could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, terrorist attacks and natural disasters have increased stakeholder concerns about the security and safety of chemical production and distribution.
Business and/or supply chain disruptions may also be caused by security breaches, which could include, for example, attacks on information technology and infrastructure by hackers, viruses, breaches due to employee error or actions or other disruptions. We and/or our suppliers may fail to effectively prevent, detect and recover from these or other security breaches and, as a consequence, such breaches could result in misuse of our assets, business disruptions, loss of property including trade secrets and confidential business information, legal claims or proceedings, reporting errors, processing inefficiencies, negative media attention, loss of sales and interference with regulatory compliance.
Like most major corporations, we are the target of industrial espionage, including cyber-attacks, from time to time. We have determined that these attacks have resulted, and could result in the future, in unauthorized parties gaining access to at least certain confidential business information. However, to date, we have not experienced any material financial impact, changes in the competitive environment or impact on business operations that we attribute to these attacks. Although management does not believe that we have experienced any material losses to date related to security breaches, including cybersecurity incidents, there can be no assurance that we will not suffer such losses in the future.
We actively manage the risks within our control that could lead to business disruptions and security breaches. As these threats continue to evolve, particularly around cybersecurity, we may be required to expend significant resources to enhance our control environment, processes, practices and other protective measures. Despite these efforts, such events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Our sales to our customers may be adversely affected should a company successfully establish an intermediary platform for the sale of our products or otherwise position itself between us and our customers.
We expect our distribution model will service customers primarily through the legacy Pioneer direct sales channel in key agricultural geographies, including the United States. In addition, we expect to supplement this approach with strong retail channels, including distributors, agricultural cooperatives and dealers, and with digital solutions that assist farmer decision-making with a view to optimize their product selection and maximize their yield and profitability. While we expect the indirect channels and our digital platform will extend
32
our reach and increase exposure of our products to other potential customers, including smaller farmers or farmers in less concentrated areas, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in this regard. If a competitor were to successfully establish an intermediary platform for distribution of our products, especially with respect to our digital platform, it may disrupt our distribution model and inhibit our ability to provide a complete go-to-market strategy covering the direct, dealer and retail channels. In such a circumstance, our sales may be adversely affected.
Volatility in our input costs, which include raw materials and production costs, could have a significant impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our input costs are variable based on the costs associated with production or with raw materials we use. For example, our production costs vary, especially on a seasonal basis where changes in weather influence supply and demand. In addition, our manufacturing processes consume significant amounts of raw materials, the costs of which are subject to worldwide supply and demand as well as other factors beyond our control. We refer to these costs collectively as input costs. Significant variations in input costs affect our operating results from period to period.
When possible, we purchase raw materials through negotiated long-term contracts to minimize the impact of price fluctuations. We also enter into over-the-counter and exchange traded derivative commodity instruments to hedge our exposure to price fluctuations on certain raw material purchases. In addition, we take actions to offset the effects of higher input costs through selling price increases, productivity improvements and cost reduction programs. Success in offsetting higher raw material costs with price increases is largely influenced by competitive and economic conditions and could vary significantly depending on the market served. If we are not able to fully offset the effects of higher input costs, it could have a significant impact on our financial results.
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Internal Reorganization. Combining the agriculture businesses of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than expected, which may adversely affect our results and negatively affect the value of Corteva common stock.
We expect to benefit from significant cost synergies through the DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program (the Synergy Program) which is designed to integrate and optimize the organization following the Merger and in preparation for the intended separation of DowDuPonts materials science business through the separation and distribution of Dow and the intended separation of DowDuPonts agriculture business through our separation and distribution. This integration and optimization is designed to be achieved through the achievement of production cost efficiencies, enhancement of the agricultural supply chain, elimination of duplicative agricultural research and development programs, optimization of our global footprint across manufacturing, sales and research and development, the reduction of corporate and leveraged services costs, and the realization of significant procurement synergies. In addition, our management also expects we will achieve growth synergies and other meaningful savings and benefits as a result of our separation and distribution.
Combining Historical DuPont and Historical Dows independent agriculture businesses and preparing for our separation and distribution are complex, costly and time-consuming processes and management may face significant challenges in implementing or realizing the currently expected synergies from our separation and distribution, many of which may be beyond the control of management, including, without limitation:
|
difficulties in achieving anticipated cost savings, synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects; |
|
the possibility of faulty assumptions underlying expectations regarding the integration or separation process, including with respect to the intended tax efficient transactions; |
|
unanticipated issues in integrating, replicating or separating information technology, communications programs, financial procedures and operations, and other systems, procedures and policies; |
33
|
addressing differences in business culture and retaining key personnel; |
|
unanticipated changes in applicable laws and regulations; |
|
managing tax costs or inefficiencies associated with integrating the operations of the combined agriculture company and the intended tax efficient separation transactions; |
|
coordinating geographically separate organizations; |
|
failing to successfully optimize our facilities footprint; |
|
failing to take advantage of our global supply chain; |
|
failing to identify and eliminate duplicative programs; and |
|
failing to otherwise integrate Historical DuPonts or Historical Dows respective agriculture businesses, including their technology platforms. |
Some of these factors will be outside of our control and any one of them could result in increased costs and diversion of managements time and energy, as well as decreases in the amount of expected revenue which could materially impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we are not able to successfully combine the agriculture businesses of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow in an efficient, cost-effective and timely manner, the anticipated benefits and cost savings from the DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program (the Synergy Program) may not be realized fully, or may not be realized at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. There can be no assurance that we, as an independent, separate public company, will be able to sustain any or all the cost savings generated from actions under the Synergy Program.
Our liquidity, business, results of operations and financial condition could be impaired if we are unable to raise capital through the capital markets or short-term debt borrowings.
Any limitation on our ability to raise money in the capital markets or through short-term debt borrowings could have a substantial negative effect on our liquidity. Our ability to affordably access the capital markets and/or borrow short-term debt in amounts adequate to finance our activities could be impaired as a result of a variety of factors, including factors that are not specific to us, such as a severe disruption of the financial markets and, in the case of debt securities or borrowings, interest rate fluctuations. Due to the seasonality of our business and the credit programs we may offer our customers, net working capital investment and corresponding debt levels will fluctuate over the course of the year.
We regularly extend credit to our customers to enable them to purchase seeds or crop protection products at the beginning of the growing season. The customer receivables may be used as collateral for short-term financing programs. Any material adverse effect upon our ability to own or sell such customer receivables, including seasonal factors that may impact the amount of customer receivables we own, may materially impact our access to capital.
We have additional agreements with financial institutions to establish programs that provide financing for select customers of our seed and crop protection products in the United States, Latin America, Europe and Asia. The programs are renewed on an annual basis. In most cases, Historical DuPont or the agriculture business of Historical Dow guarantees the extension of such credit to such customers. If we are unable to renew these agreements or access the debt markets to support customer financing our sales may be negatively impacted, which could result in increased borrowing needs to fund working capital.
Our earnings, operations and business, among other things, will impact our credit ratings, costs and availability of financing. A decrease in the ratings assigned to us by the ratings agencies may negatively impact our access to the debt capital markets and increase our cost of borrowing and the financing of our seasonal working capital.
34
There can be no assurance that we will maintain our current or prospective credit ratings. Any actual or anticipated changes or downgrades in such credit ratings may have a negative impact on our liquidity, capital position or access to capital markets.
Our customers may be unable to pay their debts to us.
We offer our customers financing programs with credit terms generally less than one year from invoicing in alignment with the growing season. Due to these credit practices as well as the seasonality of our operations, we may need to issue short-term debt at certain times of the year to fund our cash flow requirements. Our customers may be exposed to a variety of conditions that could adversely affect their ability to pay their debts. For example, customers in economies experiencing an economic downturn or in a region experiencing adverse growing conditions may be unable to repay their obligations to us, which could adversely affect our results.
Increases in pension and other post-employment benefit plan funding obligations may impair our liquidity or financial condition.
Through our ownership of EID and other members of Historical DuPont, we maintain certain Historical DuPont defined benefit pension and other post-employment benefit plans. We expect to provide additional disclosure on the allocation of these plans in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part once final determinations have been made. We use many assumptions in calculating our expected future payment obligations under these plans. Significant adverse changes in credit or market conditions could result in actual rates of returns on pension investments being lower than assumed. In addition, expected future payment obligations may be adversely impacted by changes in assumptions regarding participants, including retirees. We may be required to make significant contributions to our pension plans in the future, which could adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.
Our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected by environmental, litigation and other commitments and contingencies.
As a result of our operations, including past operations and those related to divested businesses and discontinued operations of Historical DuPont, we incur environmental operating costs for pollution abatement activities including waste collection and disposal, installation and maintenance of air pollution controls and wastewater treatment, emissions testing and monitoring and obtaining permits. We also incur environmental operating costs related to environmental related research and development activities including environmental field and treatment studies as well as toxicity and degradation testing to evaluate the environmental impact of products and raw materials. In addition, we maintain and periodically review and adjust our accruals for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs.
We expect to continue to incur environmental operating costs since we will operate global manufacturing, product handling and distribution facilities that are subject to a broad array of environmental laws and regulations. These rules are subject to change by the implementing governmental agency, which we monitor closely. Our policy will require that our operations fully meet or exceed legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, we expect to continue certain voluntary programs, and could consider additional voluntary actions, to reduce air emissions, minimize the generation of hazardous waste, decrease the volume of water use and discharges, increase the efficiency of energy use and reduce the generation of persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic materials. Costs to comply with complex environmental laws and regulations, as well as internal voluntary programs and goals, are significant and we expect these costs will continue to be significant for the foreseeable future. Over the long term, such expenditures are subject to considerable uncertainty and could fluctuate significantly.
We accrue for environmental matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. As remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site, it is
35
difficult to develop precise estimates of future site remediation costs. We expect to base such estimates on a several factors, including the complexity of the geology, the nature and extent of contamination, the type of remedy, the outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) at multi-party sites and the number of, and financial viability of, other PRPs. Considerable uncertainty exists with respect to environmental remediation costs and, under adverse changes in circumstances, the potential liability may be materially higher than our accruals.
We face risks arising from various unasserted and asserted litigation matters arising out of the normal course of our current and former business operations, including intellectual property, commercial, product liability, environmental and antitrust lawsuits. We have noted a trend in public and private suits being filed on behalf of states, counties, cities and utilities alleging harm to the general public and the environment, including waterways and watersheds. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these various proceedings. An adverse outcome in any one or more of these matters could be material to our financial results. Various factors or developments can lead to changes in current estimates of liabilities such as a final adverse judgment, significant settlement or changes in applicable law. A future adverse ruling or unfavorable development could result in future charges that could have a material adverse effect on us.
In the ordinary course of business, we may make certain commitments, including representations, warranties and indemnities relating to current and past operations, including those related to divested businesses and issue guarantees of third-party obligations. If we were required to make payments as a result, they could exceed the amounts accrued, thereby adversely affecting our results of operations.
Our operations outside the United States are subject to risks and restrictions, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our operations outside the United States are subject to risks and restrictions, including fluctuations in foreign-currency exchange rates; exchange control regulations; changes in local political or economic conditions; import and trade restrictions; import or export licensing requirements and trade policy; and other potentially detrimental domestic and foreign governmental practices or policies affecting U.S. companies doing business abroad. Although we have operations throughout the world, pro forma sales outside the U.S. in 2017 were principally to customers in Eurozone countries, Brazil and Canada. Further, our largest currency exposures are the European euro and the Brazilian real. Market uncertainty or an economic downturn in these geographic areas could reduce demand for our products and result in decreased sales volume, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations. In addition, changes in exchange rates may affect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows in future periods. We actively manage currency exposures that are associated with net monetary asset positions, committed currency purchases and sales, foreign currency-denominated revenues and other assets and liabilities created in the normal course of business.
Additionally, our ability to export our products and our sales outside the United States may be adversely affected by significant changes in trade, tax or other policies, including the risk that other countries may retaliate through the imposition of their own trade restrictions and/or increased tariffs in response to substantial changes to U.S. trade and tax policies.
Climate change and unpredictable seasonal and weather factors could impact our sales and earnings.
The agriculture industry is subject to seasonal and weather factors, which can vary unpredictably from period to period. Weather factors can affect the presence of disease and pests on a regional basis and, accordingly, can positively or adversely affect the demand for crop protection products, including the mix of products used. The weather also can affect the quality, volume and cost of seed produced for sale as well as demand and product mix. Seed yields can be higher or lower than planned, which could lead to higher inventory and related write-offs. Climate change may increase the frequency or intensity of extreme weather such as storms, floods, heat waves, droughts and other events that could affect the quality, volume and cost of seed produced for sale as well
36
as demand and product mix. Climate change may also affect the availability and suitability of arable land and contribute to unpredictable shifts in the average growing season and types of crops produced.
Our business may be adversely affected by the availability of counterfeit products.
A counterfeit product is one that has been deliberately and fraudulently mislabeled as to its identity and source. A counterfeit Corteva product, therefore, is one manufactured by someone other than us, but which appears to be the same as an authentic Corteva product. The prevalence of counterfeit products is a significant and growing industry-wide issue due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, the following: the widespread use of the Internet, which has greatly facilitated the ease by which counterfeit products can be advertised, purchased and delivered to individual consumers; the availability of sophisticated technology that makes it easier for counterfeiters to make counterfeit products; and the relatively modest risk of penalties faced by counterfeiters compared to the large profits that can be earned by them from the sale of counterfeit products. Further, laws against counterfeiting vary greatly from country to country, and the enforcement of existing laws varies greatly from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. For example, in some countries, counterfeiting is not a crime; in others, it may result in only minimal sanctions. In addition, those involved in the distribution of counterfeit products use complex transport routes to evade customs controls by disguising the true source of their products.
Our global reputation makes our products prime targets for counterfeiting organizations. Counterfeit products pose a risk to consumer health and safety because of the conditions under which they are manufactured (often in unregulated, unlicensed, uninspected and unsanitary sites) as well as the lack of regulation of their contents. Failure to mitigate the threat of counterfeit products, which is exacerbated by the complexity of the supply chain, could adversely impact our business by, among other things, causing the loss of consumer confidence in our name and in the integrity of our products, potentially resulting in lost sales and an increased threat of litigation.
We undertake significant efforts to counteract the threats associated with counterfeit products, including, among other things, working with regulatory authorities and multinational coalitions to combat the counterfeiting of products and supporting efforts by law enforcement authorities to prosecute counterfeiters; assessing new and existing technologies to seek to make it more difficult for counterfeiters to copy our products and easier for consumers to distinguish authentic from counterfeit products; working diligently to raise public awareness about the dangers of counterfeit products; working collaboratively with wholesalers, customs offices and law enforcement agencies to increase inspection coverage, monitor distribution channels and improve surveillance of distributors; and working with other members of an international trade association of agrochemical companies to promote initiatives to combat counterfeiting activity. No assurance can be given, however, that our efforts and the efforts of others will be entirely successful, and the presence of counterfeit products may continue to increase.
Failure to effectively manage acquisitions, divestitures, alliances and other portfolio actions could adversely impact our future results.
From time to time we evaluate acquisition candidates that may strategically fit our business and/or growth objectives. If we are unable to successfully integrate and develop acquired businesses, we could fail to achieve anticipated synergies and cost savings, including any expected increases in revenues and operating results, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results. We continually review our portfolio of assets for contributions to our objectives and alignment with our growth strategy. However, we may not be successful in separating underperforming or non-strategic assets and gains or losses on the divestiture of, or lost operating income from, such assets may affect our earnings. Moreover, we might incur asset impairment charges related to acquisitions or divestitures that reduce our earnings. In addition, if the execution or implementation of acquisitions, divestitures, alliances, joint ventures and other portfolio actions is not successful, it could adversely impact our financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
37
An impairment of goodwill or intangible assets could require us to record a significant non-cash charge and negatively impact our financial results.
We assess both goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment on an annual basis, or more frequently if conditions indicate that an impairment may have occurred. An impairment is recorded when the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value. As a result of the Merger, the carrying value of our Historical DuPont net assets was adjusted from historical cost to fair value, therefore increasing the risk of impairments. Future impairments of goodwill or intangible assets could be recorded as a non-cash charge in results of operations due to changes in assumption, estimates or circumstances and there can be no assurance that such impairments would be immaterial to us.
Risks Related to the Separation
We may be unable to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve from our separation from DowDuPont.
We believe that, as an independent, publicly traded company, we will be better positioned to, among other things, focus our financial and operational resources on our specific business, growth profile and strategic priorities, design and implement corporate strategies and policies targeted to our operational focus and strategic priorities, guide our processes and infrastructure to focus on our core strengths, implement and maintain a capital structure designed to meet our specific needs and more effectively respond to industry dynamics. However, we may be unable to achieve some or all of these benefits. For example, to position ourselves for the separation, we are undertaking a series of strategic, structural, process and system realignment and restructuring actions within our operations. These actions may not provide the benefits we currently expect, and could lead to disruption of our operations, loss of, or inability to recruit, key personnel needed to operate and grow our businesses following the separation, weakening of our system of internal controls or procedures and impairment of our key customer and supplier relationships. In addition, completion of the separation will require significant amounts of managements time and effort, which may divert managements attention from operating and growing our businesses. If we fail to achieve some or all of the benefits that we expect to achieve as an independent company, or do not achieve them in the time we expect, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
If the distribution, together with certain related transactions, were to fail to qualify for non-recognition treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then we could be subject to significant tax and indemnification liability and stockholders receiving Corteva common stock in the distribution could be subject to significant tax liability.
It is a condition to the distribution that DowDuPont receives the Tax Opinion from Skadden, in form and substance acceptable to DowDuPont, substantially to the effect that, among other things, the distribution and certain related transactions will qualify as a tax-free transaction under Section 355 and Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code. The Tax Opinion will rely on certain facts, assumptions, and undertakings, and certain representations from DowDuPont and us, regarding the past and future conduct of both respective businesses and other matters, including those discussed in the risk factor immediately below, as well as the IRS Ruling (as described below). Notwithstanding the Tax Opinion and the IRS Ruling, the IRS could determine on audit that the distribution or certain related transactions should be treated as a taxable transaction if it determines that any of these facts, assumptions, representations or undertakings are not correct or have been violated, or that the distribution should be taxable for other reasons, including if the IRS were to disagree with the conclusions of the Tax Opinion.
If the distribution ultimately is determined to be taxable, then a stockholder of DowDuPont that received shares of Corteva common stock in the distribution would be treated as having received a distribution of property in an amount equal to the fair market value of such shares (including any fractional shares sold on behalf of such stockholder) on the distribution date and could incur significant income tax liabilities. Such distribution would be taxable to such stockholder as a dividend to the extent of DowDuPonts current and accumulated earnings and
38
profits, which would include any earnings and profits attributable to the gain recognized by DowDuPont on the taxable distribution and could include earnings and profits attributable to certain internal transactions preceding the distribution. Any amount that exceeded DowDuPonts earnings and profits would be treated first as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of such stockholders tax basis in its shares of DowDuPont stock with any remaining amount being taxed as a gain on the DowDuPont stock. In the event the distribution is ultimately determined to be taxable, DowDuPont would recognize corporate level taxable gain on the distribution in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of Corteva common stock distributed to DowDuPont stockholders on the distribution date over DowDuPonts tax basis in such stock. In addition, if certain related transactions fail to qualify for tax-free treatment under U.S. federal, state, local tax and/or foreign tax law, we and DowDuPont could incur significant tax liabilities under U.S. federal, state, local and/or foreign tax law.
Generally, taxes resulting from the failure of the separation and distribution to qualify for non-recognition treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes would be imposed on DowDuPont or DowDuPont stockholders. Under the tax matters agreement that we will enter into with DowDuPont and Dow, subject to the exceptions described below, we are generally obligated to indemnify DowDuPont against such taxes imposed on DowDuPont. However, if the distribution fails to qualify for non-recognition treatment for U.S. federal income tax purposes for certain reasons relating to the overall structure of the Merger and the distribution, then under the tax matters agreement, we, New DuPont and Dow would share the tax liability resulting from such failure in accordance with fixed percentages as are agreed by the parties. Furthermore, under the terms of the tax matters agreement, we also generally will be responsible for any taxes imposed on New DuPont or Dow that arise from the failure of the distribution to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes within the meaning of Section 355 of the Code or the failure of certain related transactions to qualify for tax-free treatment, to the extent such failure to qualify is attributable to actions, events or transactions relating to our, or our affiliates, stock, assets or business, or any breach of our representations made in connection with the IRS Ruling or in any representation letter provided to Skadden in connection with the Tax Opinion. New DuPont and Dow will be separately responsible for any taxes imposed on Corteva that arise from the failure of the distribution to qualify as tax-free for U.S. federal income tax purposes within the meaning of Section 355 of the Code or the failure of certain related transactions to qualify for tax-free treatment, to the extent such failure to qualify is attributable to actions, events or transactions relating to such companys or its affiliates stock, assets or business, or any breach of such companys representations made in connection with the IRS Ruling or in the representation letter provided to counsel in connection with the Tax Opinion. Events triggering an indemnification obligation under the tax matters agreement include events occurring after the distribution that cause DowDuPont to recognize a gain under Section 355(e) of the Code, as discussed further below. Such tax amounts could be significant. To the extent that we are responsible for any liability under the tax matters agreement, there could be a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows in future reporting periods. For a more detailed discussion, see the section entitled Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution.
The IRS may assert that the Merger causes the distributions and other related transactions to be taxable to DowDuPont, in which case we could be subject to significant indemnification liability.
Even if the distribution otherwise constitutes a tax-free transaction to stockholders under Section 355 of the Code, DowDuPont may be required to recognize corporate level tax on the distribution and certain related transactions under Section 355(e) of the Code if, as a result of the Merger or other transactions considered part of a plan with the distribution, there is a 50 percent or greater change of ownership in DowDuPont or us. In connection with the Merger, DowDuPont sought and received a private letter ruling from the IRS regarding the proper time, manner and methodology for measuring common ownership in the stock of DowDuPont, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow for purposes of determining whether there has been a 50 percent or greater change of ownership under Section 355(e) of the Code as a result of the Merger (the IRS Ruling). The Tax Opinion will rely on the continued validity of the IRS Ruling, as well as certain factual representations from DowDuPont as to the extent of common ownership in the stock of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow immediately prior to the Merger. In addition, it is a condition to the distribution that the IRS has not revoked the IRS Ruling. Based on the
39
representations made by DowDuPont as to the common ownership in the stock of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow immediately prior to the Merger and assuming the continued validity of the IRS Ruling, the Tax Opinion will conclude that there was not a 50 percent or greater change of ownership in DowDuPont, Historical DuPont or Historical Dow for purposes of Section 355(e) as a result of the Merger. Notwithstanding the Tax Opinion and the IRS Ruling, the IRS could determine that the distribution or a related transaction should nevertheless be treated as a taxable transaction to DowDuPont if it determines that any of the facts, assumptions, representations or undertakings of DowDuPont is not correct or that the distribution should be taxable for other reasons, including if the IRS were to disagree with the conclusions in the Tax Opinion that are not covered by the IRS Ruling. If DowDuPont is required to recognize corporate level tax on the distribution and certain related transactions under Section 355(e) of the Code, then under the tax matters agreement, we may be required to indemnify New DuPont and/or Dow for all or a portion of such taxes, which could be a significant amount, if such taxes were the result of either direct or indirect transfers of Corteva common stock or certain reasons relating to the overall structure of the Merger and the distribution. For a more detailed description, see the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the DistributionTax Matters Agreement.
We will be subject to continuing contingent tax-related liabilities of DowDuPont following the distribution.
After the distribution, there will be several significant areas where the liabilities of DowDuPont may become our obligations either in whole or in part. For example, under the Code and the related rules and regulations, each corporation that was a member of DowDuPonts consolidated tax reporting group during any taxable period or portion of any taxable period ending on or before the effective time of the distribution is jointly and severally liable for the U.S. federal income tax liability of the entire consolidated tax reporting group for such taxable period. Additionally, to the extent that any subsidiary of ours was included in the consolidated tax reporting group of either Historical DuPont or Historical Dow for any taxable period or portion of any taxable period ending on or before the effective date of the Merger, such subsidiary is jointly and severally liable for the U.S. federal income tax liability of the entire consolidated tax reporting group of Historical DuPont or Historical Dow, as applicable, for such taxable period. In connection with the distribution, and the distribution of Dow, we will enter into a tax matters agreement with DowDuPont and Dow that will allocate the responsibility for prior period consolidated taxes among Corteva, New DuPont and Dow. For a more detailed description, see the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the DistributionTax Matters Agreement. If New DuPont or Dow were unable to pay any prior period taxes for which it is responsible, however, we could be required to pay the entire amount of such taxes, and such amounts could be significant. Other provisions of federal, state, local, or foreign law may establish similar liability for other matters, including laws governing tax-qualified pension plans, as well as other contingent liabilities.
We will agree to numerous restrictions to preserve the tax-free treatment of the transactions in the United States, which may reduce our strategic and operating flexibility.
Our ability to engage in certain transactions could be limited or restricted after the distribution to preserve, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the tax-free nature of the distribution by DowDuPont, and certain aspects of the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment. As discussed above, even if the distribution otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment under Section 355 of the Code, the distribution may result in corporate-level taxable gain to DowDuPont under Section 355(e) of the Code if a transaction results in a change of ownership of 50 percent or greater in us as part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the distribution. The process for determining whether an acquisition or issuance triggering these provisions has occurred, the extent to which any such acquisition or issuance results in a change of ownership and the cumulative effect of any such acquisition or issuance together with any prior acquisitions or issuances (including the Merger) is complex, inherently factual and subject to interpretation of the facts and circumstances of a particular case. Any acquisitions or issuances of Corteva common stock within a two-year period after the distribution generally are presumed to be part of such a plan that includes the distribution, although such presumption may be rebutted. As a result of these limitations, under the tax matters agreement that we will enter into with DowDuPont and Dow,
40
for the two-year period following the distribution, we will be prohibited, except in certain circumstances, from, among other things:
|
entering into any transaction resulting in acquisitions of a certain percentage of our assets, whether by merger or otherwise; |
|
dissolving, merging, consolidating or liquidating; |
|
undertaking or permitting any transaction relating to Corteva stock, including issuances, redemptions or repurchases other than certain, limited, permitted issuances and repurchases; |
|
affecting the relative voting rights of Corteva stock, whether by amending Corteva Parents certificate of incorporation or otherwise; or |
|
ceasing to actively conduct our business. |
These restrictions may significantly limit our ability to pursue certain strategic transactions or other transactions that we may believe to otherwise be in the best interests of our stockholders or that might increase the value of our business.
Following the separation and distribution we will need to provide or arrange for certain services to be provided that are currently provided by DowDuPont and/or Historical Dow.
Following the separation and distribution, we will need to provide internally or obtain from unaffiliated third parties certain services we currently receive from DowDuPont and/or Historical Dow. These services include certain information technology, research and development, finance, legal, insurance, compliance and human resources activities, the effective and appropriate performance of which is critical to our operations. We may be unable to replace these services in a timely manner or on terms and conditions as favorable as those we currently receive from DowDuPont and/or Historical Dow. In particular, information technology networks and systems are complex and duplicating these networks and systems will be challenging. Because certain portions of our business previously received these services from DowDuPont and/or Historical Dow, we may be unable to successfully establish the infrastructure or implement the changes necessary to effectively perform these activities within the context of our consolidated business, or we may incur additional costs in doing so that could adversely affect our business. In addition, if New DuPont and/or Dow do not continue to perform effectively the transition services and the other services that are called for under the services and other related agreements entered into in connection with the separation, we may not be able to operate our business effectively and our profitability may decline. If we fail to obtain the quality of administrative services necessary to operate effectively or incur greater costs in obtaining these services, our profitability, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Neither Historical DuPonts financial information nor our pro forma combined financial information are necessarily representative of the results we would have achieved as an independent, publicly traded company and may not be a reliable indicator of our future results.
The financial information of Historical DuPont and the unaudited pro forma financial information included herein may not reflect what our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows would have been had we been an independent, publicly traded company comprised solely of DowDuPonts agriculture business during the periods presented or what our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be in the future when we are an independent company. This is primarily because:
|
The historical financial information of Historical DuPont reflects Historical DuPont and does not reflect the changes that we expect to experience in connection with the separation, including the distribution of Historical DuPonts businesses aligned with DowDuPonts non-agriculture businesses. |
|
Prior to the separation, our business was operated under the corporate umbrella of DowDuPont. As part of the DowDuPont corporate organization, our business was principally operated by Historical DuPont, |
41
with certain portions of our business being operated by Historical Dow as part of its internal corporate organization, rather than our being operated as part of a consolidated agriculture business. |
|
The historical financial information of Historical DuPont and Dow AgroSciences reflects only corporate expenses of Historical DuPont and allocated corporate expenses from Historical Dow, and thus is not necessarily representative of the costs we will incur for similar services as an independent company following the separation and distribution. |
|
Our business has historically principally satisfied our working capital requirements and obtained capital for our general corporate purposes, including acquisitions and capital expenditures, as part of Historical DuPonts company-wide cash management practices, with certain portions of our business having satisfied such requirements through the practices of Historical Dow. Although these practices have historically generated sufficient cash to finance the working capital and other cash requirements of our business, following the separation and distribution, we will no longer have access to Historical Dows cash pools nor will our cash generating revenue streams mirror those of Historical DuPont and/or Historical Dow. We may therefore need to obtain additional financing from banks, through public offerings or private placements of debt or equity securities or other arrangements. |
|
Currently, our business is operated under the umbrella of DowDuPonts corporate organization, with portions of our businesses being integrated with the businesses of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow. This integration has historically permitted our business (or portions thereof) to enjoy economies of scope and scale in costs, employees, vendor relationships and customer relationships, both as part of the DowDuPont organization and within the Historical DuPont and Historical Dow internal corporate structures. Although we expect to enter into short-term transition agreements that will govern certain commercial and other relationships among us, New DuPont and Dow after the separation, those temporary arrangements may not capture the benefits our businesses have enjoyed in the past as a result of this integration. The loss of these benefits could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition following the completion of the separation. |
|
We will enter into transactions with New DuPont and Dow that did not exist prior to the separation. See the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution for information regarding these transactions. |
|
Other significant changes may occur in our cost structure, management, financing and business operations as a result of the separation and distribution and our operating as a company separate from DowDuPont. |
In addition, the unaudited pro forma financial information included in this information statement is based on the best information available, which in part includes a number of estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions may prove to be inaccurate, and accordingly, our unaudited pro forma financial information should not be assumed to be indicative of what our financial condition or results of operations actually would have been as a standalone company during the time periods presented nor to be a reliable indicator of what our financial condition or results of operations actually may be in the future.
For additional information about the unaudited pro forma financial statements, Historical DuPonts past financial performance and the basis of presentation of Historical DuPonts financial statements, see the sections entitled Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements, Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Following the separation and distribution, we may not enjoy the same benefits of diversity, leverage and market reputation that we enjoyed as a part of DowDuPont.
Following the separation and distribution, we will hold DowDuPonts agriculture business, while our business (or portions thereof) has historically benefited from DowDuPonts (and, prior to the Merger, Historical DuPonts
42
and Historical Dows) operating diversity and purchasing power as well as opportunities to pursue integrated strategies with DowDuPonts (and, prior to the Merger, Historical DuPonts and Historical Dows) other businesses, including those businesses that form part of DowDuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses that will be allocated to Dow and New DuPont, respectively, in connection with the separation. Following the separation and distribution, we will not have similar diversity or integration opportunities and may not have similar purchasing power or access to the capital markets.
Additionally, following the separation and distribution, we may become more susceptible to market fluctuations and other adverse events than if we had remained part of the current DowDuPont organizational structure. As part of DowDuPont (and, prior to the Merger, as part of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow, as applicable), our business has been able to leverage the DowDuPont, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow historical market reputation and performance as well as those businesses brand identities, which has allowed us to, among other things, recruit and retain key personnel to run our business. Following the separation and distribution, we may not enjoy the same historical market reputation as DowDuPont or Historical DuPont nor the same performance or brand identity, which may make it more difficult for us to recruit or retain such key personnel.
We will retain significant indebtedness in connection with the separation and distribution, and the degree to which we will be leveraged following completion of the distribution may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We will retain significant indebtedness in connection with the separation and distribution. Historical DuPont has historically satisfied its indebtedness obligations as well as its short-term working capital requirements and financial support functions through the earnings, assets and cash flows generated by Historical DuPonts operations. Following the separation and distribution, however, we will not be able to rely on any of the earnings, assets or cash flows that are attributable to Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses, which will be transferred from Historical DuPont to Dow and the legal entities that will comprise New DuPont after the distribution of Corteva common stock, respectively, in connection with the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment.
Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, to obtain and maintain sufficient working capital, and to meet any dividend obligations will depend exclusively on our ability to generate cash in the future from our own operations, financings or asset sales following the separation and distribution. Our ability to generate cash is further subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. We may not generate sufficient funds to service our debt and meet our business needs, such as funding working capital or the expansion of our operations. If we are not able to repay or refinance our debt as it becomes due, we may be forced to take disadvantageous actions, including reducing spending on marketing, retail trade incentives, advertising and new product innovation, reducing financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures and general corporate purposes, selling assets or dedicating an unsustainable level of our cash flow from operations to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness. In addition, our ability to withstand competitive pressures and to react to changes in our industry could be impaired. The lenders who hold our debt could also accelerate amounts due in the event that we default, which could potentially trigger a default or acceleration of the maturity of our other debt.
Restrictions under the intellectual property cross-license agreements will limit our ability to develop and commercialize certain products and services and/or prosecute, maintain and enforce certain intellectual property.
We will be dependent to a certain extent on New DuPont and Dow to prosecute, maintain and enforce certain of the intellectual property licensed under the intellectual property cross-license agreements. For example, New DuPont and Dow will be responsible for filing, prosecuting and maintaining (at their respective discretion) patents that New DuPont and Dow, respectively, license to us. New DuPont or Dow, as applicable, will also have the first right to enforce their respective patents, trade secrets and know-how licensed to us. If New DuPont or
43
Dow, as applicable, fails to fulfill its obligations or chooses to not enforce the licensed patents, trade secrets or know-how under the intellectual property cross-license agreements, we may not be able to prevent competitors from making, using and selling competitive products and services.
In addition, our use of the intellectual property licensed to us under the intellectual property cross-license agreements is restricted to certain fields, which could limit our ability to develop and commercialize certain products and services. For example, the licenses granted to us under the agreement will not extend to all fields of use that we may in the future decide to enter into. These restrictions may make it more difficult, time consuming and/or expensive for us to develop and commercialize certain new products and services, or may result in certain of our products or services being later to market than those of our competitors.
Our customers, prospective customers, suppliers or other companies with whom we conduct business may need assurances that our financial stability on a standalone basis is sufficient to satisfy their requirements for doing or continuing to do business with them.
Some of our customers, prospective customers, suppliers or other companies with whom we conduct business may need assurances that our financial stability on a standalone basis is sufficient to satisfy their requirements for doing or continuing to do business with them, and may require us to provide additional credit support, such as letters of credit or other financial guarantees. Any failure of parties to be satisfied with our financial stability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may have received better terms from unaffiliated third parties than the terms received in the commercial agreements we will enter into with DowDuPont and Dow.
In connection with the separation and distribution, we will enter into certain commercial agreements with DowDuPont and Dow, including, but not limited to, certain services, supply and real estate related agreements, which will govern the provision of services and use of assets following the separation and distribution that were previously provided within DowDuPont, Historical DuPont and/or Historical Dow. These agreements were negotiated in the context of the separation of Corteva and Dow from DowDuPont, while Corteva and Dow were each still part of DowDuPont and, accordingly, may not reflect terms that would have resulted from negotiations among unaffiliated third parties and we may have received better terms from third parties. See the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution.
In connection with our separation we will assume, and indemnify New DuPont and Dow for, certain liabilities. If we are required to make payments pursuant to these indemnities, we may need to divert cash to meet those obligations and our financial results could be negatively impacted. In addition, New DuPont and Dow will indemnify us for certain liabilities. These indemnities may not be sufficient to insure us against the full amount of liabilities for which we will be allocated responsibility, and New DuPont and/or Dow may not be able to satisfy their indemnification obligations in the future.
Pursuant to the separation agreement, the employee matters agreement and the tax matters agreement with DowDuPont and Dow, we will agree to assume, and indemnify New DuPont and Dow for, certain liabilities for uncapped amounts, which may include, among other items, associated defense costs, settlement amounts and judgments, as discussed further in Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution. Payments pursuant to these indemnities may be significant and could negatively impact our business, particularly indemnities relating to our actions that could impact the tax-free nature of the distribution. Third parties could also seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities allocated to New DuPont and Dow, including those related to DowDuPonts specialty products and/or materials science businesses, respectively, and those related to discontinued and/or divested businesses and operations of Historical Dow, which have been allocated to Dow. New DuPont and/or Dow, as applicable, will agree to indemnify us for such liabilities, but such indemnities may not be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities. In addition, New DuPont and/or Dow, as applicable, may not be able to fully satisfy their indemnification obligations. Even if we ultimately succeed in
44
recovering from New DuPont and/or Dow, as applicable, any amounts for which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses ourselves. Each of these risks could negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Additionally, we generally will assume and be responsible for the payment of our share of (i) certain liabilities of DowDuPont relating to, arising out of or resulting from certain general corporate matters of DowDuPont, (ii) certain liabilities of Historical DuPont relating to, arising out of or resulting from general corporate matters of Historical DuPont and discontinued and/or divested businesses and operations of Historical DuPont and (iii) certain separation expenses not otherwise allocated to New DuPont or Dow (or allocated specifically to us) pursuant to the separation agreement, and third parties could seek to hold us responsible for New DuPonts or Dows share of any such liabilities. For more information, see the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the DistributionSeparation Agreement. New DuPont and/or Dow, as applicable, will indemnify us for their share of any such liabilities; however, such indemnities may not be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities, and/or New DuPont and/or Dow may not be able to fully satisfy their respective indemnification obligations. In addition, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from New DuPont and/or Dow any amounts for which we are held liable in excess of our agreed share, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses ourselves. Each of these risks could negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Until the distribution occurs, DowDuPont has the sole discretion to change the terms of the distribution.
Until the distribution occurs, DowDuPont will have the sole and absolute discretion to determine and change the terms of the distribution, including the establishment of the record date and distribution date. These changes could be unfavorable to us. In addition, DowDuPont may decide at any time not to proceed with the distribution.
The business separation and related transactions may expose us to potential liabilities arising out of state and federal fraudulent conveyance laws and legal distribution requirements.
Although we will receive a solvency opinion from an investment bank confirming that we and New DuPont will each be adequately capitalized following the distribution, the separation could be challenged under various state and federal fraudulent conveyance laws. Fraudulent conveyances or transfers are generally defined to include transfers made or obligations incurred with the actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud current or future creditors or transfers made or obligations incurred for less than reasonably equivalent value when the debtor was insolvent, or that rendered the debtor insolvent, inadequately capitalized or unable to pay its debts as they become due. Any unpaid creditor could claim that DowDuPont did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value in the separation and distribution, and that the separation and distribution left New DuPont insolvent or with unreasonably small capital or that DowDuPont intended or believed it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature. If a court were to agree with such a plaintiff, then such court could void the separation and distribution as a fraudulent transfer or impose substantial liabilities on us, which could adversely affect our financial condition and our results of operations. Among other things, the court could return some of our assets or your shares of Corteva common stock to New DuPont, provide New DuPont with a claim for money damages against us in an amount equal to the difference between the consideration received by New DuPont and the fair market value of us at the time of the distribution, or require us to fund liabilities of other companies involved in the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment for the benefit of creditors.
The distribution is also subject to review under state corporate distribution statutes. Under the Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL), a corporation may only pay dividends to its stockholders either (i) out of its surplus (net assets minus capital) or (ii) if there is no such surplus, out of its net profits for the fiscal year in which the dividend is declared and/or the preceding fiscal year. Although the DowDuPont board of directors intends to make the distribution out of DowDuPonts surplus and will receive an opinion that DowDuPont has adequate surplus under Delaware law to declare the dividend of Corteva common stock in connection with the distribution, there can be no assurance that a court will not later determine that some or all of the distribution was unlawful.
45
Risks Related to Corteva Common Stock
We cannot be certain that an active trading market for Corteva common stock will develop or be sustained after the distribution, and following the distribution, our stock price may fluctuate significantly.
A public market for Corteva common stock does not currently exist. We expect that a limited market, commonly known as a when-issued trading market, will develop as early as the trading day prior to the record date for the distribution, and we expect regular-way trading of Corteva common stock to begin on the distribution date. However, we cannot guarantee that an active trading market will develop or be sustained for Corteva common stock after the distribution. If an active trading market does not develop, you may have difficulty selling your shares of common stock at an attractive price, or at all. In addition, we cannot predict the prices at which shares of Corteva common stock may trade after the distribution.
Similarly, DowDuPont cannot predict the effect of the distribution on the trading prices of its common stock. Immediately following the distribution, you will own shares in both New DuPont and Corteva. We cannot predict the price at which Corteva common stock will trade after the distribution. After the distribution of the shares of Corteva common stock, the combined trading prices of Corteva common stock and DowDuPont common stock may not equal the regular-way trading price of a share of DowDuPont common stock immediately prior to the distributions of Dow and Corteva common stock. The price at which Corteva common stock trades may fluctuate significantly, particularly until an orderly public market develops. Trading prices for Corteva common stock will be determined in the public markets and may be influenced by many factors.
The market price of Corteva common stock may fluctuate significantly due to a number of factors, some of which may be beyond our control, including:
|
our business profile and market capitalization may not fit the investment objectives of DowDuPonts current stockholders, causing a shift in our initial investor base, and Corteva common stock may not be included in some indices in which DowDuPont common stock is included, causing certain holders to be mandated to sell their shares of Corteva common stock; |
|
our quarterly or annual earnings, or those of other companies in our industry; |
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover Corteva common stock after the distribution; |
|
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results; |
|
changes in earnings estimates by securities analysts or our ability to meet those estimates or our earnings guidance; |
|
the operating and stock price performance of other comparable companies; |
|
overall market fluctuations and domestic and worldwide economic conditions; and |
|
other factors described in these Risk Factors and elsewhere in this information statement. |
Stock markets in general have experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of a particular company. These broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of Corteva common stock.
A number of shares of Corteva common stock are or will be eligible for future sale, which may cause our stock price to decline.
Any sales of substantial amounts of shares of Corteva common stock in the public market or the perception that such sales might occur, in connection with the distribution or otherwise, may cause the market price of Corteva common stock to decline. Upon completion of the distribution, we expect that we will have an aggregate of approximately shares of Corteva common stock issued and outstanding. These shares will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), unless the shares are owned by one of our affiliates, as that term is defined in Rule 405 under the Securities Act.
46
We are unable to predict whether large amounts of Corteva common stock will be sold in the open market following the distribution. We are also unable to predict whether a sufficient number of buyers would be in the market at that time. In this regard, a portion of DowDuPont common stock is held by index funds tied to stock indices. If we are not included in these indices at the time of distribution, these index funds may be required to sell Corteva common stock.
We cannot guarantee the timing, amount or payment of dividends on Corteva common stock in the future.
There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient surplus under Delaware law to be able to pay any dividends. Prior to the distribution, while we are a wholly owned subsidiary of DowDuPont, our board of directors intends to declare a dividend of for the second quarter of 2019, to be paid to our stockholders as of a record date following the distribution. The declaration, payment and amount of any subsequent dividend will be subject to the sole discretion of our post-distribution, independent board of directors and will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition and prospects, our capital requirements and access to capital markets, covenants associated with certain of our debt obligations, legal requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant, and there can be no assurances that we will continue to pay a dividend in the future. There can also be no assurance that the combined annual dividends, if any, on Corteva common stock, New DuPont common stock and Dow common stock, if any, will be equal to the annual dividends on DowDuPont common stock prior to the distribution of Dow and Corteva common stock. For more information, see the section entitled Dividend Policy.
Your percentage of ownership in us may be diluted in the future.
Your percentage ownership in us may be diluted because of equity issuances for acquisitions, capital market transactions or otherwise, including, without limitation, equity awards that we may be granting to our directors, officers and employees. Our employees may have options to purchase shares of Corteva common stock after the distribution as a result of conversion of their DowDuPont stock options (in whole or in part) to our stock options.
In addition, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation will authorize us to issue, without the approval of our stockholders, one or more classes or series of preferred stock having such designation, powers, preferences and relative, participating, optional and other special rights, including preferences over Corteva common stock with respect to dividends and distributions, as our board of directors generally may determine. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could dilute the voting power or reduce the value of Corteva common stock. For example, we could grant the holders of preferred stock the right to elect some number of our directors in all events or on the happening of specified events or to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences we could assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of Corteva common stock. See the section entitled Description of Our Capital Stock.
Certain provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws, Delaware law and in the tax matters agreement may prevent or delay an acquisition of us, which could decrease the trading price of Corteva common stock.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws will contain, and Delaware law contains, provisions that are intended to deter coercive takeover practices and inadequate takeover bids by making such practices or bids unacceptably expensive to the bidder and to encourage prospective acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors rather than to attempt a hostile takeover. See the section entitled Description of Our Capital Stock.
In addition, following the distribution, we will be subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL). Section 203 of the DGCL provides that, subject to limited exceptions, persons that (without prior board approval) acquire, or are affiliated with a person that acquires, more than 15 percent of the outstanding voting stock of a Delaware corporation shall not engage in any business combination with that
47
corporation, including by merger, consolidation or acquisitions of additional shares, for a three-year period following the date on which that person or its affiliate becomes the holder of more than 15 percent of the corporations outstanding voting stock.
We believe these provisions will protect our stockholders from coercive or otherwise unfair takeover tactics by requiring potential acquirers to negotiate with our board of directors and by providing our board of directors with more time to assess any acquisition proposal. These provisions are not intended to make us immune from takeovers. However, these provisions will apply even if an acquisition proposal or offer may be considered beneficial by some stockholders and could delay or prevent an acquisition that our board of directors determines is not in our and our stockholders best interests. These provisions may also prevent or discourage attempts to remove and replace incumbent directors.
Several of the agreements that we have entered into with DowDuPont require DowDuPonts consent to any assignment by us of our rights and obligations, or a change of control of us, under the agreements. The consent rights set forth in these agreements might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control that you may consider favorable. See the sections entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution for a more detailed description of these agreements and provisions.
In addition, an acquisition or further issuance of our stock could trigger the application of Section 355(e) of the Code. For a discussion of Section 355(e), see the section entitled Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution. Under the tax matters agreement, we would be required to indemnify New DuPont for the tax imposed under Section 355(e) of the Code resulting from an acquisition or issuance of our stock, even if we did not participate in or otherwise facilitate the acquisition, and this indemnity obligation might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control that you may consider favorable.
48
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This information statement and other materials DowDuPont and we have filed or will file with the SEC contain, or will contain, forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act and Section 27A of the Securities Act, which may be identified by their use of words like plans, expects, will, anticipates, believes, intends, projects, estimates or other words of similar meaning. All statements that address expectations or projections about the future, including statements about the companys strategy for growth, product development, regulatory approval, market position, anticipated benefits of recent acquisitions, timing of anticipated benefits from restructuring actions, outcome of contingencies, such as litigation and environmental matters, expenditures, and financial results, and timing of, as well as expected benefits from, the separation of us and Dow from DowDuPont, are forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and expectations of future events which may not be accurate or realized. Forward-looking statements also involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the companys control. While the list of factors presented here is considered representative, no such list should be considered to be a complete statement of all potential risks and uncertainties. Unlisted factors may present significant additional obstacles to the realization of forward-looking statements. Consequences of material differences in results as compared with those anticipated in the forward-looking statements could include, among other things, business disruption, operational problems, financial loss, legal liability to third parties and similar risks, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Some of the important factors that could cause the companys actual results to differ materially from those projected in any such forward-looking statements are:
|
effect of competition and consolidation in our industry; |
|
failure to successfully develop and commercialize our pipeline; |
|
failure to obtain or maintain the necessary regulatory approvals for some our products; |
|
failure to enforce our intellectual property rights or defend against intellectual property claims asserted by others; |
|
effect of competition from manufacturers of generic products; |
|
costs of complying with evolving regulatory requirements; |
|
effect of the degree of public understanding and acceptance or perceived public acceptance of our biotechnology and other agricultural products; |
|
effect of changes in agricultural and related policies of governments and international organizations; |
|
impact of our dependence on our relationships or contracts with third parties; |
|
effect of disruptions to our supply chain, information technology or network systems; |
|
effect of volatility in our input costs; and |
|
failure to realize the anticipated benefits of the Internal Reorganization, including failure to benefit from significant cost synergies through the Synergy Program. |
Additionally, there may be other risks and uncertainties that we are unable to currently identify or that we do not currently expect to have a material impact on our business.
49
Where, in any forward-looking statement, an expectation or belief as to future results or events is expressed, such expectation or belief is based on the current plans and expectations of management and expressed in good faith and believed to have a reasonable basis, but there can be no assurance that the expectation or belief will result or be achieved or accomplished. Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated include the matters described under the sections entitled Risk Factors, Business and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. We disclaim and do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, except as required by applicable law.
50
Background of the Distribution
DowDuPont is a holding company comprised of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow. DowDuPont conducts its operations worldwide through the following eight segments: Agriculture; Performance Materials & Coatings; Industrial Intermediates & Infrastructure; Packaging & Specialty Plastics; Electronics & Imaging; Nutrition & Biosciences; Transportation & Advanced Polymers; and Safety & Construction. DowDuPont has approximately 98,000 employees.
In connection with the signing of the merger agreement, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow announced their intention to pursue, subject to the approval of the DowDuPont board of directors and any required regulatory approvals, the separation of the combined company, DowDuPont, into three, independent publicly traded companiesone for each of its agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesseswith the belief that these companies would lead their respective industries through science-based innovation to meet the needs of customers and help solve global challenges. Upon the consummation of the Merger, DowDuPont reiterated this intention and the DowDuPont board of directors established three committees (collectively, the advisory committees), one to oversee the business and affairs of each of its agriculture, materials science and specialty products divisions, including each businesss preparation for the intended separations.
On September 12, 2017, the DowDuPont board of directors announced the composition of the agriculture business, Corteva, which is expected to be the second business separated and will hold DowDuPonts agriculture business.
The distribution of Corteva common stock is expected to be the second of two distributions to effectuate DowDuPonts plan to separate DowDuPont into three independent, publicly traded companies. The separation of Corteva is expected to occur after the separation of Dow. The separation of Dow will be completed through the distribution to DowDuPont stockholders of all the then issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Dow, a wholly owned subsidiary of DowDuPont that at the time of Dows distribution will hold DowDuPonts materials science business. Following the distribution of Dow, the remaining company, which will hold DowDuPonts agriculture and specialty products business, is expected to, subject to the approval of its board of directors, complete the distribution of Corteva. The separation of Corteva is expected to be completed on June 1, 2019 through the distribution to DowDuPont stockholders of all the Corteva common stock.
Prior to these distributions, DowDuPont will undertake the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment, as described in the section entitled Merger, Intended Separations, Reorganization and Financial Statement PresentationInternal Reorganization and as contemplated by the separation agreement, which is further discussed in the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the DistributionSeparation Agreement. As a result of these transactions, at the time of its distribution, Dow will hold the assets and liabilities associated with DowDuPonts materials science business (in addition to any assets and liabilities allocated to Dow pursuant to the separation agreement), Corteva will hold the assets and liabilities associated with DowDuPonts agriculture business (in addition to any assets and liabilities allocated to Corteva pursuant to the separation agreement), and after the final distribution, New DuPont will continue to hold the assets and liabilities associated with DowDuPonts specialty products business (in addition to any assets and liabilities allocated to New DuPont pursuant to the separation agreement).
The DowDuPont board of directors believes that the completion of these separations will result in three independent, publicly traded companies that will lead their respective industries through productive, science-based innovation to meet the needs of customers and help solve global challenges and is the best available opportunity to unlock the value of DowDuPonts businesses.
On , the DowDuPont board of directors approved the distribution of all the then-issued and outstanding shares of Corteva common stock to DowDuPont stockholders on the basis of shares of
51
Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock held at the close of business on the record date for the distribution. As a result of the distribution, Corteva will become an independent, publicly traded company. The distribution of Corteva common stock as described in this information statement is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions. For a more detailed description of these conditions, see this section under Conditions to the Distribution. DowDuPont stockholders may also receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Corteva common stock that they would have received in the distribution. The distribution is intended to be generally tax-free to DowDuPont stockholders for U.S. federal income tax purposes, except for any cash received in lieu of fractional shares. DowDuPont stockholders will not be required to make any payment, surrender or exchange their DowDuPont common stock or take any other action to receive their shares of Corteva common stock in the distribution.
The separation of DowDuPonts materials science business will also be subject to certain conditions, and stockholders will separately receive information about the expected separation and distribution of Dow. For additional information, please see the registration statement on Form 10 filed with the SEC by Dow on September 7, 2018 and any amendments or supplements thereto that may be filed with the SEC by Dow from time to time.
The DowDuPont board of directors has the discretion to abandon one or both of the intended distributions and to alter the terms of each distribution. As a result, we cannot provide any assurances that the distribution of Corteva common stock will be completed, or that the distribution of Dow common stock will be completed.
Reasons for the Separation and Distribution
Since the Merger, the DowDuPont board of directors has met regularly to review DowDuPonts businesses, has consulted regularly with the advisory committees and has evaluated the strategic opportunities available to the combined company and its businesses. The DowDuPont board of directors believes that the separation of DowDuPont into three independent, publicly traded companies through the separation of its agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesses is the best available opportunity to unlock the value of DowDuPont. The DowDuPont board of directors, in consultation with the advisory committees, has considered a wide variety of factors in evaluating the planned separations and distributions of Corteva and Dow, including the risk that one or more of the distributions is abandoned and not completed. The DowDuPont board of directors believes that the potential benefits to DowDuPont stockholders of the separation of each of its three businesses into independent companies with their own distinctive business and capital structures and ability to focus on their respective specific growth plans will provide DowDuPont stockholders with certain opportunities and benefits not available to the combined company.
The DowDuPont board of directors believes that the separation of the agriculture business from DowDuPont is in the best interests of DowDuPont and its stockholders. Among other things, the DowDuPont board of directors considered the following potential benefits of the separations and distributions:
|
Attractive Investment Profile . The creation of separate companies with strong, focused businesses and each with a distinct financial profile and clear investment thesis is expected to drive significant long-term value for all stockholders and also reduce the complexities surrounding investor understanding, enabling investors to invest in each company separately based on its distinct characteristics. |
|
Enhanced Means to Evaluate Financial Performance . Investors should be better able to evaluate the business condition, strategy and financial performance of each company within the context of its particular industry and markets. It is expected that, over time following the completion of the separations, the aggregate market value of us, Dow and New DuPont will be higher, on a fully distributed basis and assuming the same market conditions, than if DowDuPont were to remain under its current configuration. |
|
Distinct Position . The separations are expected to create three independent companies with tailored growth strategies and differentiated technologies, resulting in: Corteva, a leading global agricultural |
52
company with one of the most comprehensive and diverse portfolios in the industry; Dow, a leading global materials science company that will be a low-cost, innovation-driven leader; and New DuPont, a leading global specialty products company that will be a technology driven innovation leader. Each company will provide investors with a distinct investment option that may be more attractive to current investors and will allow the company to attract different investors than the current investment option available to DowDuPont stockholders of one combined company. |
|
Focused Capital Allocation . Each independent, publicly traded company will have a capital structure that is expected to be best suited to its specific needs and will be able to make capital allocation decisions that better align with its streamlined business. In addition, after the separations, the respective businesses within each company will no longer need to compete internally for capital and other corporate resources with businesses allocated to another company. |
|
Ability to Adapt to Industry Changes . Each company is expected to be able to maintain a sharper focus on its core business and growth opportunities, which will allow each company to respond better and more quickly to developments in its industry. |
|
Dedicated Management Team with Enhanced Strategic Focus . Each companys management team will be able to design and implement corporate policies and strategies that are tailored to such companys specific business characteristics and to focus on maximizing the value of its business. |
|
Improved Management Incentive Tools . The separation will permit the creation of equity securities, including options and restricted stock units, for each publicly traded company with values more closely linked to the performance of such companys business than would be readily available under the current configuration of businesses within DowDuPont as a single public company. The DowDuPont board of directors believes such equity-based compensation arrangements should provide enhanced incentives for performance and improve the ability for each publicly traded company to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel. |
|
Direct Access to Capital Markets and Ability to Pursue Strategic Opportunities . Each companys business will have direct access to the capital markets, and is expected to be better situated to pursue future acquisitions, joint ventures and other strategic opportunities as well as internal expansion that is more closely aligned with such companys strategic goals and expected growth opportunities. |
The DowDuPont board of directors also considered a number of potentially negative factors, including the loss of synergies and joint purchasing power from ceasing to operate as part of a larger, more diversified company, risks relating to the creation of a new public company, such as increased costs from operating as a separate public company, potential disruptions to the businesses and loss or dilution of brand identities, possible increased administrative costs and one-time separation costs, restrictions on each companys ability to pursue certain opportunities that may have otherwise been available in order to preserve the tax-free nature of the distributions and related transactions for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the fact that each company will be less diversified than the current configuration of DowDuPonts businesses prior to the separation, and distributions and the potential inability to realize the anticipated benefit of the separation.
The DowDuPont board of directors concluded that the potential benefits of pursuing each separation and distribution outweighed the potential negative factors in connection therewith. Neither DowDuPont nor we can assure you that, following the separation and distribution, any of the benefits described above or otherwise will be realized to the extent anticipated or at all. For more information see the section entitled Risk Factors.
The DowDuPont board of directors also considered these potential benefits and potentially negative factors in light of the risk that one or more of the distributions is abandoned or otherwise not completed, resulting in DowDuPont separating into fewer than the intended three independent, publicly traded companies. The DowDuPont board of directors believes that the potential benefits to DowDuPont stockholders discussed above apply to the separation of each of the intended three businesses and that the creation of each independent
53
company, with its distinctive business and capital structure and ability to focus on its specific growth plan, will provide DowDuPont stockholders with greater long-term value than retaining one investment in the combined company.
In view of the wide variety of factors considered in connection with the evaluation of the separation and the complexity of these matters, the DowDuPont board of directors did not find it useful to, and did not attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the factors considered. The individual members of the DowDuPont board of directors may have given different weights to different factors.
History of Corteva and Formation of a Holding Company Prior to the Distribution
EID was initially incorporated in Delaware in 1915 as the successor to a company that was founded in 1802. On August 31, 2017, as a result of the completion of the Merger, Historical DuPont became a subsidiary of DowDuPont. Prior to the Merger, Historical DuPont was a publicly traded company that was listed on the NYSE and operated a global business that included agriculture, electronics and communications, industrial biosciences, nutrition and health, performance materials and protection solutions segments.
As part of DowDuPonts plan to separate its agriculture business, on March 16, 2018, DowDuPont formed Corteva Parent to serve as a holding company for Corteva. Corteva Parent is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of DowDuPont and at the time of the distribution will be the direct parent of EID. In connection with the separation and distribution, DowDuPont plans to transfer the assets and liabilities of the agriculture business not currently held by Corteva, to Corteva (see the sections entitled Merger, Intended Separations, Reorganization and Financial Statement PresentationInternal Reorganization and Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the DistributionSeparation Agreement). DowDuPont will then complete the separation through a distribution of Corteva common stock by way of a pro rata dividend to DowDuPont stockholders as of the record date. Following the separation and distribution, Corteva will be a separate company and the remaining company, New DuPont, will not retain any ownership interest in Corteva. As a result of the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment, at the time of the distribution, Corteva Parent will hold, among certain other assets and liabilities, the agriculture business of Historical DuPont (Historical DuPont Agriculture) and Dow AgroSciences (in addition to any assets and liabilities allocated to it pursuant to the separation agreement).
The Number of Shares of Corteva Common Stock You Will Receive
For every share of DowDuPont common stock that you own at the close of business on , 2019, the record date, you will receive shares of Corteva common stock on the distribution date. DowDuPont will not distribute any fractional shares of Corteva common stock. Instead, if you are a registered holder, the distribution agent will aggregate fractional shares into whole shares, sell the whole shares in the open market at prevailing market prices and distribute the aggregate cash proceeds (net of discounts and commissions) of the sales pro rata (based on the fractional share such stockholder would otherwise have been entitled to receive) to each stockholder who otherwise would have been entitled to receive a fractional share in the distribution. The distribution agent, in its sole discretion, without any influence by DowDuPont or us, will determine when, how, through which broker-dealer and at what price to sell the whole shares. Neither we nor DowDuPont will be able to guarantee any minimum sale price in connection with the sale of these shares. Recipients of cash in lieu of fractional shares will not be entitled to any interest on the amounts received in lieu of fractional shares.
The aggregate net cash proceeds of these sales will be taxable for U.S. federal income tax purposes. See the section entitled Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Distribution for an explanation of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the distribution. If you are a registered holder of DowDuPont common stock, you will receive a check from the distribution agent in an amount equal to your pro rata share of the aggregate net cash proceeds of the sales. We estimate that it will take approximately two weeks from the distribution date for the distribution agent to complete the distributions of the aggregate net cash proceeds. If you hold your DowDuPont common stock through a bank or brokerage firm, your bank or brokerage firm will
54
receive, on your behalf, your pro rata share of the aggregate net cash proceeds of the sales and will be responsible for transmitting to you your share of such proceeds.
When and How You Will Receive the Distribution
With the assistance of the distribution agent, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, the distribution of Corteva common stock is expected to occur on June 1, 2019, the distribution date, to all holders of outstanding DowDuPont common stock on the record date. will serve as the distribution agent in connection with the distribution, and will serve as the transfer agent and registrar for the Corteva common stock. DowDuPont stockholders may receive cash in lieu of any fractional shares of Corteva common stock which they would have been entitled to receive.
If you own DowDuPont common stock as of the close of business on the record date, the shares of Corteva common stock that you are entitled to receive in the distribution will be issued to you electronically, as of the distribution date, in direct registration or book-entry form. If you are a registered holder, the distribution agent will credit the whole shares of Corteva common stock you receive in the distribution to a book-entry account with our transfer agent on or shortly following the distribution date. Approximately two weeks after the distribution date, the distribution agent will mail you a direct registration account statement that reflects the shares of Corteva common stock that have been registered in book-entry form in your name as well as a check reflecting any cash you are entitled to receive in lieu of fractional shares. Direct registration form refers to a method of recording share ownership when no physical share certificates are issued to stockholders, as is the case in this distribution.
Most DowDuPont stockholders own their shares beneficially through a bank, broker or other nominee. In such cases, the bank, broker or other nominee would be said to hold the shares in street name and the shares of Corteva common stock you are entitled to receive in the distribution will be issued electronically to your bank or broker and your ownership would be recorded on the bank or brokerage firms books. If you hold your DowDuPont common stock through a bank, broker or other nominee, your bank or brokerage firm will credit your account for the shares of Corteva common stock that you are entitled to receive in the distribution, and will be responsible for transmitting to you any cash in lieu of fractional shares you are entitled to receive. If you have any questions concerning the mechanics of the distribution and you hold your shares of DowDuPont in street name, please contact your bank or brokerage firm.
If you sell your DowDuPont common stock in the regular-way market on or prior to the last trading day prior to the distribution date, you will be selling your right to receive shares of Corteva common stock in the distribution.
Transferability of Shares You Receive
The shares of Corteva common stock distributed to DowDuPont stockholders in connection with the distribution will be transferable without registration under the Securities Act, except for shares received by persons who may be deemed to be our affiliates. Persons who may be deemed to be our affiliates after the distribution generally include individuals or entities that control, are controlled by or are under common control with us, which may include certain of our executive officers, directors or principal stockholders. Securities held by Corteva affiliates will be subject to resale restrictions under the Securities Act. Corteva affiliates will be permitted to sell shares of Corteva common stock only pursuant to an effective registration statement or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, such as the exemption afforded by Rule 144 under the Securities Act.
Results of the Distribution
After our separation from DowDuPont, we will be an independent, publicly traded company. The actual number of shares to be distributed will be determined by DowDuPont at the close of business on the record date for the
55
distribution based on the distribution ratio. The distribution will not affect the number of outstanding shares of DowDuPont common stock, which will now reflect ownership of New DuPont, or any rights of DowDuPont stockholders. DowDuPont will not distribute any fractional shares of Corteva common stock.
Substantially simultaneously with the distribution of Dow, we will enter into the separation agreement with DowDuPont and Dow to effect the separation and provide a framework for our relationship with New DuPont and Dow after the separation and distribution. In connection with the separation and distribution, we will also enter into various other agreements with DowDuPont and Dow, including a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, intellectual property cross-license agreements, trademark license agreements and certain other intellectual property, services, supply and real estate-related agreements. These agreements will collectively provide for the allocation among us, New DuPont and Dow of the assets, liabilities and obligations of DowDuPont and its subsidiaries (including its investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after our and Dows respective separations from DowDuPont and will govern certain relationships among us, New DuPont and Dow. For a more detailed description of these agreements, see the sections entitled Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Separation and Our Relationship With New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution.
Market for Corteva common stock
There is currently no public trading market for Corteva common stock. We intend to apply to list Corteva common stock on the under the symbol . We have not and will not set the initial price of Corteva common stock. The initial price will be established by the public markets.
Corteva cannot predict the price at which its common stock will trade after the distribution. The combined trading prices, after the distribution, of the shares of Corteva common stock that each DowDuPont stockholder will receive in the distribution and the shares of DowDuPont common stock held at the record date may not equal the regular-way trading price of a share of DowDuPont common stock immediately prior to the distribution. The price at which Corteva common stock trades may fluctuate significantly, particularly until an orderly public trading market develops. Trading prices for Corteva common stock will be determined in the public markets and may be influenced by many factors. See the section entitled Risk FactorsRisks Related to Corteva Common Stock.
Trading Between the Record Date and Distribution Date
Beginning on or shortly before the record date and continuing through the last trading day prior to the distribution date, DowDuPont expects that there will be two markets in DowDuPont common stock: a regular-way market and an ex-distribution market. Shares of DowDuPont common stock that trade on the regular-way market will trade with an entitlement to receive the shares of Corteva common stock distributed pursuant to the separation. Shares of DowDuPont common stock that trade on the ex-distribution market will trade without an entitlement to receive the Corteva common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. Therefore, if you sell DowDuPont common stock in the regular-way market on or prior to the last trading day prior to the distribution date, you will be selling your right to receive Corteva common stock in the distribution. If you own DowDuPont common stock at the close of business on the record date and sell those shares on the ex-distribution market on or prior to the last trading day prior to the distribution date, you will receive the shares of Corteva common stock that you are entitled to receive pursuant to your ownership of DowDuPont common stock as of the record date.
Furthermore, we anticipate that trading in Corteva common stock will begin on a when-issued basis as early as the trading day prior to the record date for the distribution and will continue through the last trading day prior to the distribution date. When-issued trading in the context of a separation refers to a sale or purchase made conditionally on or before the distribution date because the securities of the separated entity have not yet been distributed. The when-issued trading market will be a market for Corteva common stock that will be
56
distributed to holders of DowDuPont common stock on the distribution date. If you owned DowDuPont common stock at the close of business on the record date, you would be entitled to Corteva common stock distributed pursuant to the distribution. You may trade this entitlement to shares of Corteva common stock, without DowDuPont common stock you own, on the when-issued market. We anticipate that trading on a when-issued basis will continue through the last trading day prior to the distribution date. At the open of trading on the distribution date, regular-way trading will begin.
Conditions to the Distribution
We expect that the distribution will be effective on June 1, 2019, the distribution date, provided that, among other conditions described in this information statement, the following conditions shall have been satisfied:
|
the SEC having declared effective the Form 10 under the Exchange Act, no stop order relating to the Form 10 being in effect, no proceedings seeking such a stop order being pending before or threatened by the SEC and this information statement having been distributed to DowDuPont stockholders; |
|
the listing of Corteva common stock on the having been approved, subject to official notice of issuance; |
|
the DowDuPont board of directors having received an opinion from to the effect that, following the distribution, we and DowDuPont will each be solvent and adequately capitalized, and that DowDuPont has adequate surplus under Delaware law to declare the dividend of Corteva common stock; |
|
the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment as they relate to us having been effectuated prior to the distribution date; |
|
the DowDuPont board of directors having declared the dividend of Corteva common stock to effect the distribution and having approved the distribution and all related transactions, which approval may be given or withheld in the boards absolute and sole discretion (and such declaration or approval not having been withdrawn); |
|
DowDuPont having elected the individuals to be members of our board of directors following the distribution, and certain directors as set forth in the separation agreement having resigned from the DowDuPont board of directors; |
|
each of us, DowDuPont and Dow and each of our or their applicable subsidiaries having entered into all ancillary agreements to which it and/or such subsidiary is contemplated to be a party; |
|
no events or developments having occurred or existing that make it inadvisable to effect the distribution or that would result in the distribution and related transactions not being in the best interest of DowDuPont or its stockholders; |
|
no order, injunction or decree by any governmental entity of competent jurisdiction or other legal restraint or prohibition preventing consummation of the distribution or any of the related transactions, including the transfers of assets and liabilities contemplated by the separation agreement, shall be pending, threatened, issued or in effect; |
|
the receipt by DowDuPont of the Tax Opinion; and |
|
the IRS not having revoked the IRS Ruling (as described in the section entitled Risk FactorsRisks Related to the Separation). |
The fulfillment of the foregoing conditions does not create any obligations on DowDuPonts part to effect the distribution, and the DowDuPont board of directors has the ability, in its sole discretion, to amend, modify or abandon the distribution and related transactions at any time prior to the distribution date.
57
Regulatory Approvals
We must complete the necessary registration under U.S. federal securities laws of Corteva common stock, as well as the applicable listing requirements of the for such shares.
Other than the requirements discussed above, we do not believe that any other material governmental or regulatory filings or approvals will be necessary to consummate the distribution.
No Appraisal Rights
DowDuPont stockholders will not have any appraisal rights in connection with the distribution.
Reasons for Furnishing this Information Statement
We are furnishing this information statement solely to provide information to DowDuPont stockholders who will receive shares of Corteva common stock in the distribution. You should not construe this information statement as an inducement or encouragement to buy, hold or sell any of our securities or any securities of DowDuPont. We believe that the information contained in this information statement is accurate as of the date set forth on the cover. Changes to the information contained in this information statement may occur after that date, and neither DowDuPont nor we undertake any obligation to update the information except in the normal course of DowDuPonts and our public disclosure obligations and practices.
58
We expect that we will pay a quarterly dividend following the distribution. The declaration, payment and amount of any dividends following the distribution will be subject to the sole discretion of our post-distribution, independent board of directors and, in the context of our financial policy, will depend upon many factors, including our financial condition and prospects, our capital requirements and access to capital markets, covenants associated with certain of our debt obligations, legal requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant, and there can be no assurances that we will continue to pay a dividend in the future. There can also be no assurance that, after the distribution, the combined annual dividends, if any, on the common stock of us, New DuPont and Dow, if any, will be equal to the annual dividends on DowDuPont common stock prior to the distribution of Dow and Corteva common stock.
59
The following table sets forth Cortevas cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of June 30, 2018, on a historical and on a pro forma basis giving effect to the Business Realignment, the Internal Reorganization and the separation and distribution, as if they occurred on June 30, 2018. The historical cash and cash equivalents and capitalization for Corteva are derived from the unaudited Historical DuPont consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2018. Explanations for the pro forma adjustments can be found under Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements. The following table should be reviewed in conjunction with Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibits 99.2 and 99.3 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
As of June 30, 2018 | ||||||||
(In millions) | Historical 1 | Pro Forma | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,421 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Borrowings and capital lease obligations: |
||||||||
Current |
$ | 3,701 | ||||||
Long-term |
9,728 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total borrowings and capital lease obligations |
$ | 13,429 | ||||||
Equity: |
||||||||
Common stock |
$ | | ||||||
Preferred stock |
239 | |||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
74,845 | |||||||
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings |
(1,201 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(1,345 | ) | ||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
229 | |||||||
Total equity |
72,767 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total capitalization |
$ | 86,196 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents cash and cash equivalents, debt and equity of Historical DuPont, and is not indicative of Cortevas future capitalization. |
We have not yet finalized our post-distribution capitalization. We intend to update the above disclosure to reflect our post-distribution capitalization in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
60
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Historical DuPont operated a global business that included agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesses, and has been determined to best represent the predecessor entity to Corteva. As such, the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements (pro forma financial statements) are derived from the audited annual and unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Historical DuPont, and the audited annual and unaudited interim combined financial statements of Dow AgroSciences which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibits 99.2, 99.3, 99.4 and 99.5, respectively, to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
As part of the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment, Historical DuPont will transfer entities and the related assets and liabilities of its materials science and specialty products businesses and will receive entities and the related assets and liabilities of Dow AgroSciences, such that Historical DuPont will retain those assets and liabilities relevant to DowDuPonts agricultural business.
The following pro forma financial statements reflect the Historical DuPont materials science and specialty products divestitures as discontinued operations and the receipt of Dow AgroSciences as a common control combination. Upon completion of the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment, the historical financial statements of Corteva will be recast to reflect the discontinued operations for each period presented, as well as to include Dow AgroSciences from the Effective Time of the Merger.
For purposes of DowDuPonts financial statement presentation, Historical Dow was determined to be the accounting acquirer in the Merger and Historical DuPonts assets and liabilities are reflected at fair value as of the close of the Merger in the historical financial statements of DowDuPont. In connection with the Merger and the related accounting determination, Historical DuPont elected to apply push down accounting; as such, Historical DuPonts historical financial statements reflect the fair value of its assets and liabilities for all periods subsequent to the Merger. For purposes of Historical DuPonts financial statement presentation, periods following the closing of the Merger are labeled Successor and reflect DowDuPonts basis in the fair values of the assets and liabilities of Historical DuPont. All periods prior to the closing of the Merger reflect the historical accounting basis in Historical DuPonts assets and liabilities and are labeled Predecessor. Historical DuPonts historical financial statements include a black line division between the columns titled Predecessor and Successor to signify that the amounts shown for the periods prior to and following the Merger are not comparable.
The pro forma financial statements give effect to the following:
|
The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2018 gives effect to the Business Realignment, Internal Reorganization and the separation and distribution as if they had been consummated on June 30, 2018. |
|
The unaudited pro forma combined statements of income for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 give effect to the Merger, the Business Realignment, Internal Reorganization and the separation and distribution as if they had been consummated on January 1, 2016. |
|
The unaudited pro forma combined statement of income for the year ended December 31, 2015 gives effect to the divestitures of the Historical DuPont materials science and specialty products businesses as part of the Internal Reorganization as if they had been consummated on January 1, 2015. See note 6 for further details. |
The pro forma financial statements are presented for informational purposes only, and do not purport to represent what the results of operations or financial position would have been had the Merger, Business Realignment, Internal Reorganization and the separation and distribution to DowDuPont stockholders of all the outstanding shares of Corteva common stock actually occurred on the dates indicated, nor do they purport to project the results of operations or financial position for any future period or as of any future date.
The pro forma financial statements include leveraged functional costs previously allocated to Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses that did not meet the definition of expenses from
61
discontinued operations in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification 205, Presentation of Financial Statements (ASC 205). Additionally, the financial statements of Dow AgroSciences include costs representing allocations of certain leveraged functional and corporate overhead expenses for services from Historical Dow. These costs of Historical DuPont and Dow AgroSciences include, but are not limited to, general corporate expenses related to finance, legal, information technology and human resources. Based on managements current estimates of costs we expect to incur as a stand-alone company, we believe there are approximately $175 million to $225 million of annual leveraged functional and corporate expenses reflected in Cortevas 2017 pro forma income from continuing operations that are not expected to continue post separation.
One-time transaction-related costs incurred prior to, or concurrent with, the closing of the Merger and the expected distribution transactions are not included in the pro forma statements of income. The pro forma financial statements do not reflect restructuring or integration activities or other costs following the separation and distribution transactions that may be incurred to achieve cost or growth synergies of Corteva. As no assurance can be made that these costs will be incurred or the growth synergies will be achieved, no adjustment has been made.
The pro forma financial statements as of June 30, 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, do not yet reflect the following:
|
Corteva or certain of its subsidiaries intend to enter into certain various manufacturing, supply and service related agreements with Dow and DowDuPont in connection with the separation (see the section entitled Cortevas Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution). These agreements will provide for different pricing than the historical intercompany and intracompany practices of Historical Dow and Historical DuPont. Corteva has not yet finalized all of the terms of these agreements, but intends to include additional details on the terms of the agreements in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part. Because the terms of these agreements have not been finalized, the financial impact cannot be determined at this time. |
|
The Telone ® Soil Fumigant business (Telone) will not transfer to Corteva as part of the common control combination of Dow AgroSciences, and Corteva will remain the exclusive distributor of Telone ® Soil Fumigant products for Dow after the separation and distribution transactions. The pro forma financial statements reflect the removal of the assets, liabilities and results of operations related to Telone, but do not yet include the adjustment to reflect recurring impacts of the related distribution agreement between Corteva and Dow. Corteva intends to include additional details on the terms of the agreement in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part. Because the terms of this agreement have not been finalized, the financial impact cannot be determined at this time. |
|
At the time of the separation and distribution, DowDuPont intends Corteva to have a credit profile substantially similar to that of Historical DuPont prior to the Merger. Because certain actions to achieve the intended capital structure have not been finalized, the financial impact cannot be determined at this time, and no adjustment has been made to the pro forma financial statements. Corteva intends to include additional details on capital structure in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part. |
62
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2018
(in millions) |
Successor
Corteva Continuing Operations 1 |
Separation
Pro Forma Adjustments |
Pro Forma
Corteva |
|||||||||||||
Note 6 | Note 3 | |||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 2,801 | $ | | $ | 2,801 | ||||||||||
Marketable securities |
49 | | 49 | |||||||||||||
Accounts and notes receivablenet |
7,334 | (72 | ) | (a) | 7,262 | |||||||||||
Inventories |
4,338 | (9 | ) | (a) | 4,329 | |||||||||||
Other current assets |
1,260 | | 1,260 | |||||||||||||
Total current assets |
15,782 | (81 | ) | 15,701 | ||||||||||||
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates |
188 | | 188 | |||||||||||||
Net property |
4,578 | | 4,578 | |||||||||||||
Goodwill |
14,610 | | 14,610 | |||||||||||||
Other intangible assets |
12,319 | | 12,319 | |||||||||||||
Deferred income tax assets |
420 | | 420 | |||||||||||||
Other assets |
1,810 | | 1,810 | |||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 49,707 | $ | (81 | ) | $ | 49,626 | |||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations |
$ | 3,714 | $ | | $ | 3,714 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable |
3,651 | (18 | ) | (a) | 3,633 | |||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
248 | | 248 | |||||||||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
2,673 | (37 | ) | (a) | 2,636 | |||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
10,286 | (55 | ) | 10,231 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
9,736 | | 9,736 | |||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
1,378 | | 1,378 | |||||||||||||
Pension and other postemployment benefitsnoncurrent |
6,473 | | 6,473 | |||||||||||||
Other noncurrent obligations |
1,993 | (39 | ) | (b)(c) | 1,954 | |||||||||||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
19,580 | (39 | ) | 19,541 | ||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
| | (d) | | ||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
21,407 | | (d) | 21,407 | ||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
14 | 13 | (e) | 27 | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(1,852 | ) | | (1,852 | ) | |||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
19,569 | 13 | 19,582 | |||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
272 | | 272 | |||||||||||||
Total equity |
19,841 | 13 | 19,854 | |||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 49,707 | $ | (81 | ) | $ | 49,626 |
(1) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas pro forma historical balance sheet, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses, as well as the common control combination of Dow AgroSciences. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.
63
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
Successor
Corteva Continuing Operations 1 |
Pro Forma
Adjustments |
Pro Forma
Corteva |
|||||||||||||
Note 6 | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 9,552 | $ | (79 | ) | 3(a) | $ | 9,473 | ||||||||
3(a) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
6,547 | (1,349 | ) | 4(b) | 5,198 | |||||||||||
Research and development expense |
725 | (1 | ) | 3(a) | 724 | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
1,638 | (8 | ) | 3(a) | 1,630 | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
196 | | 196 | |||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
231 | | 231 | |||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
444 | | 444 | |||||||||||||
Sundry incomenet |
115 | | 115 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
187 | | 187 | |||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes |
(301 | ) | 1,279 | 978 | ||||||||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
(107 | ) | 242 | 3(a) 4(g) | 135 | |||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations after income taxes |
(194 | ) | 1,037 | 843 | ||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
18 | | 18 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders |
$ | (212 | ) | $ | 1,037 | $ | 825 | |||||||||
Earnings per common share from continuing operations (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
(1) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses, as well as the common control combination of Dow AgroSciences. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.
64
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
(in millions, except per share
amounts) |
Predecessor
Corteva Continuing Operations 1 |
Dow
AgroSciences |
Dow
AgroSciences Adjustments |
Merger Pro
Forma Adjustments |
Adjusted
Corteva Continuing Operations |
Separation
Pro Forma Adjustments |
Pro
Forma Corteva |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note 6 | As Reported | Note 2 | Note 4 | (subtotal) | Note 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 6,553 | $ | 3,166 | $ | (50 | ) | $ | (53 | ) | (a) | $ | 9,616 | $ | (71 | ) | (a) | $ | 9,545 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
3,272 | 1,996 | (43 | ) | (38 | ) | (a)(c) | 5,187 | (31 | ) | (a) | 5,156 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
463 | 277 | (8 | ) | 8 | (c) | 740 | (1 | ) | (a) | 739 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
1,278 | 402 | (19 | ) | 8 | (c) | 1,669 | (8 | ) | (a) | 1,661 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
33 | 8 | | 92 | (d) | 133 | | 133 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related charges (benefit)net |
4 | (1 | ) | | | 3 | | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
222 | | 15 | (31 | ) | (e) | 206 | | 206 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sundry (expense) incomenet |
(357 | ) | (419 | ) | (4 | ) | | (780 | ) | | (780 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
183 | 15 | | (60 | ) | (f) | 138 | | 138 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
741 | 50 | 1 | (32 | ) | 760 | (31 | ) | 729 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
(402 | ) | (68 | ) | | (6 | ) | (g) | (476 | ) | (8 | ) | (a) | (484 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes |
1,143 | 118 | 1 | (26 | ) | 1,236 | (23 | ) | 1,213 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
6 | 21 | | | 27 | | 27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders |
$ | 1,137 | $ | 97 | $ | 1 | $ | (26 | ) | $ | 1,209 | $ | (23 | ) | $ | 1,186 | ||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per common share from continuing operations (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
(1) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses, adjusted for certain reclassification adjustments to align the financial statement presentation of Historical DuPont to that of Corteva. See note 6 for further details. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.
65
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income
for the Year Ended December 31, 2017
(in millions, except per share
amounts) |
Predecessor
Corteva Continuing Operations 1 |
Dow
AgroSciences 2 |
Successor
Corteva Continuing Operations 3 |
Dow
AgroSciences Adjustments |
Merger Pro
Forma Adjustments |
Adjusted
Corteva Continuing Operations |
Separation
Pro Forma Adjustments |
Pro Forma
Corteva |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note 6 | Note 6 | Note 2 | Note 4 | (subtotal) | Note 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 6,954 | $ | 3,777 | $ | 3,800 | $ | (200 | ) | $ | (60 | ) | (a) | $ | 14,271 | $ | (149 | ) | (a) | $ | 14,122 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
3,591 | 2,485 | 2,967 | (172 | ) | (465 | ) | (a)(b)(c) | 8,406 | (66 | ) | (a) | 8,340 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
635 | 370 | 515 | (18 | ) | 10 | (c) | 1,512 | (2 | ) | (a) | 1,510 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
1,571 | 538 | 887 | (44 | ) | 11 | (c) | 2,963 | (16 | ) | (a) | 2,947 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
40 | 11 | 97 | | 122 | (d) | 270 | | 270 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related charges (benefit)net |
13 | (1 | ) | 270 | | (10 | ) | (e) | 272 | | 272 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
354 | | 225 | 55 | (168 | ) | (e) | 466 | | 466 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sundry (expense) incomenet |
(593 | ) | (417 | ) | 819 | (679 | ) | | (870 | ) | | (870 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
254 | 26 | 142 | | (80 | ) | (f) | 342 | | 342 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
(97 | ) | (69 | ) | (484 | ) | (700 | ) | 520 | (830 | ) | (65 | ) | (895 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
(440 | ) | (11 | ) | (2,593 | ) | (238 | ) | 173 | (g) | (3,109 | ) | (16 | ) | (a) | (3,125 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations after income taxes |
343 | (58 | ) | 2,109 | (462 | ) | 347 | 2,279 | (49 | ) | 2,230 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
8 | 17 | 10 | | | 35 | | 35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders |
$ | 335 | $ | (75 | ) | $ | 2,099 | $ | (462 | ) | $ | 347 | $ | 2,244 | $ | (49 | ) | $ | 2,195 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings per common share from continuing operations (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
(1) |
For the period January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017. Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses; adjusted for certain reclassification adjustments to align the financial statement presentation of Historical DuPont to that of Corteva. See note 6 for further details. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
(2) |
For the period January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017. |
(3) |
For the period September 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses, as well as the common control combination of Dow AgroSciences. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.
66
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income
for the Year Ended December 31, 2016
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
Predecessor
Corteva Continuing Operations 1 |
Dow
AgroSciences |
Dow
AgroSciences Adjustments |
Merger Pro
Forma Adjustments |
Adjusted
Corteva Continuing Operations |
Separation
Pro Forma Adjustments |
Pro Forma
Corteva |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Note 6 | As Reported | Note 2 | Note 4 | (subtotal) | Note 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 8,265 | $ | 6,165 | $ | (290 | ) | $ | (78 | ) | (a) | $ | 14,062 | $ | (145 | ) | (a) | $ | 13,917 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
4,593 | 4,020 | (180 | ) | (49 | ) | (a)(c) | 8,384 | (76 | ) | (a) | 8,308 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
925 | 586 | (15 | ) | 15 | (c) | 1,511 | (4 | ) | (a) | 1,507 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
2,116 | 845 | (37 | ) | 17 | (c) | 2,941 | (16 | ) | (a) | 2,925 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
45 | 18 | | 184 | (d) | 247 | | 247 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
438 | 11 | 4 | | 453 | | 453 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
285 | | 27 | (147 | ) | (e) | 165 | | 165 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sundry (expense) incomenet |
(50 | ) | (16 | ) | (7 | ) | | (73 | ) | | (73 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
370 | 30 | | (120 | ) | (f) | 280 | | 280 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
(557 | ) | 639 | (96 | ) | 22 | 8 | (49 | ) | (41 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
(291 | ) | (48 | ) | (33 | ) | 9 | (g) | (363 | ) | (12 | ) | (a) | (375 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations after income taxes |
(266 | ) | 687 | (63 | ) | 13 | 371 | (37 | ) | 334 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
11 | 14 | | | 25 | | 25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders |
$ | (277 | ) | $ | 673 | $ | (63 | ) | $ | 13 | $ | 346 | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 309 | |||||||||||||||||
Earnings per common share from continuing operations (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
(1) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses; adjusted for certain reclassification adjustments to align the financial statement presentation of Historical DuPont to that of Corteva. See note 6 for further details. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
See accompanying Notes to the Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements.
67
NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1DESCRIPTION OF THE TRANSACTIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The pro forma financial statements include adjustments related to the Merger, the Business Realignment, the Internal Reorganization and the separation and distribution transactions, as required by Article 11 of SEC Regulation S-X. Historical DuPont has been determined to best represent the predecessor entity to Corteva. As a result, the historical financial statements of Corteva reflected in the pro forma financial statements are those of Historical DuPont. The historical consolidated financial information has been adjusted to give effect to events that are (1) directly attributable to the Merger, the Business Realignment, Internal Reorganization and the separation and distribution, (2) factually supportable and (3) with respect to the pro forma statements of income, expected to have a continuing impact on the consolidated results. Further, these pro forma adjustments contain estimates, which are based on information currently available to management and are subject to change, which could have a material impact on these pro forma financial statements.
The Merger
At the Effective Time of the Merger, pursuant to the merger agreement, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow each merged with subsidiaries of DowDuPont and, as a result, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow became subsidiaries of DowDuPont.
One-time transaction-related expenses incurred prior to, or concurrent with, the closing of the Merger are not included in the pro forma statements of income.
The Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment
Historical DuPont was founded in 1802 and was incorporated in Delaware in 1915. Immediately prior to the Merger, Historical DuPont was comprised of agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesses. As a result of the Merger, these businesses, as well as the agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesses of Historical Dow, are presently held indirectly by DowDuPont through its combined ownership of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow. Through an internal reorganization, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow will each realign their respective businesses into three subgroups: agriculture, materials science and specialty products. DowDuPont, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow will each transfer and receive entities and businesses such that, after the internal reorganization, Corteva will hold either directly or indirectly Historical DuPont Agriculture and Dow AgroSciences, along with the assets and liabilities allocated to each group pursuant to the separation agreement (as described in more detail in Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the DistributionSeparation AgreementTransfer of Assets and Assumption of Liabilities).
As a result of the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment, Corteva will own 100% of the outstanding common stock of EID. Preferred stockholders of EID will continue to hold such shares following the separation and distribution. After the separation and distribution, EID will remain a subsidiary of Corteva, will continue to be a reporting company and expects to comply with the requirements of the Exchange Act. Further, as a result of the Internal Reorganization, EID will own 100% of Dow AgroSciences on a consolidated basis.
Distribution of Historical DuPonts Materials Science and Specialty Products Businesses
Cortevas distributions of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses will be accounted for as discontinued operations. As such, pro forma adjustments related to the distributions have been prepared in accordance with the discontinued operations guidance in ASC 205 and therefore do not allocate any general corporate overhead expenses of Historical DuPont to the materials science and specialty products businesses and include only those costs that are directly related to the discontinued businesses and are not expected to continue. The Companys current estimates for discontinued operations are preliminary and could
68
change as the Company finalizes discontinued operations accounting. As such, the pro forma financial statements do not reflect what Cortevas results of operations or financial position would have been on a stand-alone basis and are not necessarily indicative of Cortevas future results of operations. See note 6 for additional information.
Common Control Combination of Dow AgroSciences
Cortevas acquisition of Dow AgroSciences will be treated as a transfer between entities under common control. As such, the Company will record the assets, liabilities, and equity of the Dow AgroSciences business on its balance sheet at their historical basis. Transfers of businesses between entities under common control requires the financial statements to be presented as if the transaction had occurred at the point at which common control first existed (the Effective Time of the Merger). Cortevas historical financial statements and related notes will, after the closing of Cortevas acquisition of Dow AgroSciences, be revised to include the historical balances of DowAgroSciences from September 1, 2017 onward.
For pro forma purposes, the unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet as of June 30, 2018 is presented as if the common control combination of Dow AgroSciences had occurred on June 30, 2018 and the unaudited pro forma combined statements of income are presented as if the common control combination of Dow AgroSciences had occurred on January 1, 2016. Transactions between Dow AgroSciences and Historical DuPont Agriculture have been eliminated as if Dow AgroSciences and Historical DuPont Agriculture were consolidated affiliates since January 1, 2016.
The Separation and Distribution of Corteva
The distribution of Corteva common stock will occur by way of a pro rata distribution to DowDuPont stockholders. Each DowDuPont stockholder will be entitled to receive shares of Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock held by such stockholder at the close of business on , 2019, the record date of the distribution. The actual number of shares of Corteva common stock that DowDuPont will distribute will depend on the numbers of shares of DowDuPont common stock outstanding on the record date.
Before the separation from DowDuPont, Corteva will enter into the separation and distribution agreement with DowDuPont and Dow to effect the separation and provide a framework for Cortevas relationship with New DuPont and Dow. After the separation and distribution Corteva will also enter into certain other agreements with DowDuPont and Dow, including a tax matters agreement, an employee matters agreement, intellectual property cross-license agreements, trademark license agreements and certain other intellectual property, services, supply and real estate-related agreements. These agreements will provide for the terms of the separation between Corteva, New DuPont and Dow of the assets, liabilities and obligations (including investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) of DowDuPont and its subsidiaries attributable to the periods prior to, at and after Cortevas and Dows respective separations from DowDuPont and will govern the relationship among Corteva, New DuPont and Dow subsequent to the completion of the separations and distributions.
69
NOTE 2DOW AGROSCIENCES ADJUSTMENTS
As a condition of Brazils Administrative Council for Economic Defense regulatory approval of the Merger, Historical Dow divested a select portion of Dow AgroSciences corn seed business in Brazil, including some seed processing plants and seed research centers, a copy of Dow AgroSciences Brazilian corn germplasm bank, the MORGAN brand and a license for the use of the DOW SEMENTES brand for a certain period of time (collectively, the DAS Brazil Assets). On July 11, 2017, Historical Dow announced it had entered into a definitive agreement to sell the DAS Brazil Assets to CITIC Agri Fund. During the fourth quarter of 2017, Dow AgroSciences completed the disposition of the DAS Brazil Assets. The below represents amounts that were removed from the pro forma statements of income to reflect this divestiture.
(in millions) |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
|||||||||
Net sales |
$ | (50 | ) | $ | (200 | ) | $ | (290 | ) | |||
Cost of goods sold |
(36 | ) | (144 | ) | (166 | ) | ||||||
Research and development expenses |
(7 | ) | (12 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(12 | ) | (23 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||
Sundry incomenet |
(4 | ) | (679 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
Loss (income) from continuing operations before income taxes |
1 | (700 | ) | (96 | ) | |||||||
Provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
| (238 | ) | (33 | ) | |||||||
Loss (income) from continuing operations after income taxes |
$ | 1 | $ | (462 | ) | $ | (63 | ) |
Additionally, in order to align the financial statement presentation of Dow AgroSciences to that of Cortevas continuing operations, certain reclassification adjustments have been made to the pro forma statements of income as follows:
(in millions) |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 August 31, 2017 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
|||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | | $ | | $ | (2 | ) | |||||
Research and development expenses |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | | $ | | $ | (2 | ) | |||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
$ | | $ | | $ | 4 | ||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | (7 | ) | $ | (28 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | |||
Research and development expenses |
$ | (1 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | (7 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | |||
Integration and separation costs |
$ | 15 | $ | 55 | $ | 27 |
70
NOTE 3SEPARATION RELATED PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS
The pro forma financial statements reflect the following adjustments related to the separation and distribution transactions:
(a) |
Adjustment to remove the Telone business that is not transferring to Corteva as part of the common control combination of Dow AgroSciences. The below represents amounts that were removed from the pro forma financial statements. |
Balance Sheet
(in millions) |
As of June 30,
2018 |
|||
Accounts and notes receivablenet |
$ | (72 | ) | |
Inventories |
(9 | ) | ||
Total assets |
$ | (81 | ) | |
Accounts payable |
$ | (18 | ) | |
Accrued and other current liabilities |
(37 | ) | ||
Total liabilities |
$ | (55 | ) | |
Retained earnings |
(26 | ) | ||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | (81 | ) |
Statements of Income
(in millions) |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
||||||||||||
Net Sales |
$ | (79 | ) | $ | (71 | ) | $ | (149 | ) | $ | (145 | ) | ||||
Cost of goods sold |
(34 | ) | (31 | ) | (66 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||||||
Research and development expenses |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(8 | ) | (8 | ) | (16 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||||
Loss (income) from continuing operations before income taxes |
(36 | ) | (31 | ) | (65 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes on continuing operations 1 |
(9 | ) | (8 | ) | (16 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||
Loss (income) from continuing operations after income taxes |
$ | (27 | ) | $ | (23 | ) | $ | (49 | ) | $ | (37 | ) |
(1) |
Adjustment to record the income tax impacts of the pro forma adjustments using a blended statutory tax rate of 25%. This rate does not reflect Cortevas effective tax rate, which will include other items and may be significantly different than the rates assumed for purposes of preparing these pro forma financial statements. |
(b) |
Adjustment to remove $3 million of liabilities related to litigation matters that are included in the financial statements of Dow AgroSciences, but will not transfer to Corteva as part of the common control combination. |
(c) |
Adjustment to remove $36 million of tax related liabilities associated with the divested portion of Dow AgroSciences corn seed business in Brazil. |
(d) |
Adjustment to reflect the number of common shares expected to be outstanding upon completion of the separation and related transactions. As of the distribution date, DuPont equity will be adjusted to reflect the distribution of Corteva shares of common stock to DowDuPont shareholders, at a distribution ratio of shares of Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock. |
(e) |
Reflects the impact to Cortevas retained earnings from pro forma adjustments described above. |
71
NOTE 4MERGER-RELATED PRO FORMA ADJUSTMENTS
The pro forma combined statements of income reflect the following adjustments that are directly attributable to the Merger and expected to have a continuing impact on Corteva:
(a) |
Transactions between Dow AgroSciences and Historical DuPont have been eliminated as if Dow AgroSciences and Historical DuPont were consolidated affiliates for the entire period presented. Adjustment reflects the elimination of sales and cost of goods sold of $53 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, $60 million for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and $78 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. |
(b) |
Represents the removal of cost of goods sold of $1,315 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $425 million for the Successor period September 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, related to the amortization of Historical DuPonts agriculture business inventory step-up recognized in connection with the Merger, as the incremental amortization is directly attributable to the Merger and will not have a continuing impact. |
(c) |
Represents estimated additional depreciation expense related to the fair value adjustment to net property, plant and equipment of Historical DuPonts agriculture business. The table below is a summary of the information used to calculate the pro forma increase in depreciation expense. |
(in millions) |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
|||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 15 | $ | 20 | $ | 29 | ||||||
Research and development expenses |
$ | 8 | $ | 10 | $ | 15 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | 8 | $ | 11 | $ | 17 |
(d) |
Represents estimated additional amortization expense of $92 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, $122 million for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and $184 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 related to the fair value adjustment to Historical DuPonts agriculture business intangible assets. |
(e) |
Represents the elimination of one-time transaction costs directly attributable to the Merger. Transaction costs of $31 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, $168 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, and $147 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 were eliminated from integration and separation costs and $10 million was eliminated from restructuring and asset-related charges (benefits)net for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017. |
(f) |
Represents a reduction of interest expense of $60 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, $80 million for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and $120 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 related to amortization of the fair value adjustment to Historical DuPonts long-term debt. |
(g) |
Represents the income tax effect of the pro forma adjustments related to the Merger calculated using enacted statutory rates applicable in each period at the legal entity in which the pre-tax adjustments were made. |
NOTE 5CORTEVA EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION
The unaudited pro forma combined basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods presented are based on pro forma net income from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders divided by basic and diluted weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. The pro forma combined shares outstanding are impacted by the Corteva common shares distributed to DowDuPont stockholders in connection with the separation, as well as historical equity awards that were converted into Corteva equity awards as a result of the transactions. The number of shares of Corteva common stock used to compute the pro forma basic earnings per share for the periods is presented below.
72
The numerator for the basic and diluted earnings per share calculations is equal to the unaudited pro forma combined net income attributable to Corteva for all periods presented. The denominator for the basic earnings per share calculation for all periods presented is equal to the number of shares issued to DowDuPont stockholders, assuming shares of Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock held by such stockholder at the close of business on , 2019, the record date of the distribution. The table below contains reconciliations of the denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the periods indicated:
(in millions) |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, |
For the
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||
DowDuPont basic weighted-average common shares as of June 30, 2018 |
||||||||||||||||
Corteva distribution ratio 1 |
||||||||||||||||
Corteva weighted-average common sharesbasic |
||||||||||||||||
Dilutive effective of Historical DowDuPont equity awards 2 |
||||||||||||||||
Corteva distribution ratio 1 |
||||||||||||||||
Plus: Dilutive effect of Corteva equity awards |
||||||||||||||||
Corteva weighted-average common sharesdiluted |
(1) |
Each DowDuPont stockholder will be entitled to receive shares of Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock held by such stockholder. |
(2) |
As a result of the Merger, reflects a weighted averaging effect of DowDuPont equity awards outstanding during the respective post-merger periods. |
NOTE 6INTERNAL REORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS REALIGNMENT
The pro forma financial statements, as shown below, present the pro forma results of operations and financial position of Historical DuPont, after giving effect to the following transactions:
|
Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses, which are reflected in all periods below as discontinued operations, in accordance with ASC 205. |
|
Acquisition of Dow AgroSciences, which is reflected from September 1, 2017 forward as a transfer between entities under common control. |
Pro forma adjustments reflecting the above transactions are expected to be reflected in Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements. The pro forma financial statements do not reflect what Cortevas results of operations or financial position would have been on a stand-alone basis and are not necessarily indicative of Cortevas future results of operations or financial position.
73
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2018
(in millions) |
Successor
Historical DuPont |
Dow
AgroSciences |
Discontinued
Operations |
Historical
Adjustments 1 |
Successor
Corteva Continuing Operations 2 |
|||||||||||||||||||
As Reported | As Reported | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,421 | $ | 74 | $ | (1,694 | ) | $ | | $ | 2,801 | |||||||||||||
Marketable securities |
374 | | (325 | ) | | 49 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accounts and notes receivablenet |
7,734 | 2,441 | (2,827 | ) | (14 | ) | (a)(b) | 7,334 | ||||||||||||||||
Inventories |
6,303 | 1,835 | (3,796 | ) | (4 | ) | (a) | 4,338 | ||||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
1,311 | 134 | (185 | ) | | 1,260 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total current assets |
20,143 | 4,484 | (8,827 | ) | (18 | ) | 15,782 | |||||||||||||||||
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates |
1,459 | 53 | (1,324 | ) | | 188 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net property |
11,832 | 1,354 | (8,608 | ) | | 4,578 | ||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
45,510 | 1,344 | (32,244 | ) | | 14,610 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets |
26,866 | 193 | (14,740 | ) | | 12,319 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax assets |
361 | 150 | (301 | ) | 210 | (c) | 420 | |||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
1,839 | 88 | (158 | ) | 41 | (b) | 1,810 | |||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 108,010 | $ | 7,666 | $ | (66,202 | ) | $ | 233 | $ | 49,707 | |||||||||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations |
$ | 3,701 | $ | 17 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | | $ | 3,714 | |||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
4,002 | 1,614 | (1,923 | ) | (42 | ) | (a) | 3,651 | ||||||||||||||||
Income taxes payable |
138 | 144 | (34 | ) | | 248 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
3,024 | 406 | (783 | ) | 26 | (b) | 2,673 | |||||||||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
10,865 | 2,181 | (2,744 | ) | (16 | ) | 10,286 | |||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
9,728 | 21 | (13 | ) | | 9,736 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
5,424 | 225 | (4,465 | ) | 194 | (c) | 1,378 | |||||||||||||||||
Pension and other postemployment benefitsnoncurrent |
7,389 | 133 | (1,049 | ) | | 6,473 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other noncurrent obligations |
1,837 | 180 | (65 | ) | 41 | (b) | 1,993 | |||||||||||||||||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
24,378 | 559 | (5,592 | ) | 235 | 19,580 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock |
239 | | | (239 | ) | (d) | | |||||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
74,845 | | (53,438 | ) | | 21,407 | ||||||||||||||||||
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings |
(1,201 | ) | 5,736 | (4,535 | ) | 14 | (f) | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(1,345 | ) | (840 | ) | 333 | | (1,852 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
72,538 | 4,896 | (57,640 | ) | (225 | ) | 19,569 | |||||||||||||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
229 | 30 | (226 | ) | 239 | (d) | 272 | |||||||||||||||||
Total equity |
72,767 | 4,926 | (57,866 | ) | 14 | 19,841 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 108,010 | $ | 7,666 | $ | (66,202 | ) | $ | 233 | $ | 49,707 |
(1) |
See disclosures following these pro forma financial statements for further details regarding the Historical Adjustments. |
(2) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas pro forma historical balance sheet, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses, as well as the common control combination of Dow AgroSciences. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
74
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
Successor
Historical DuPont |
Dow
AgroSciences |
Discontinued
Operations |
Historical
Adjustments 1 |
Successor
Corteva Continuing Operations 2 |
||||||||||||||||||
(in millions) | As Reported | As Reported | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 15,244 | $ | 3,208 | $ | (8,838 | ) | $ | (62 | ) | (a) | $ | 9,552 | |||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
10,516 | 2,022 | (5,924 | ) | (67 | ) | (a)(i) | 6,547 | ||||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
778 | 239 | (288 | ) | (4 | ) | (i) | 725 | ||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
2,141 | 382 | (870 | ) | (15 | ) | (i) | 1,638 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
648 | 11 | (463 | ) | | 196 | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
188 | 123 | (86 | ) | 6 | (i) | 231 | |||||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
582 | | (176 | ) | 38 | (i) | 444 | |||||||||||||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
241 | 18 | (144 | ) | | 115 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
166 | 21 | | | 187 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
466 | 428 | (1,175 | ) | (20 | ) | (301 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations |
168 | 121 | (484 | ) | 88 | (g) | (107 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations after income taxes |
298 | 307 | (691 | ) | (108 | ) | (194 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
8 | 11 | (6 | ) | 5 | (e) | 18 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Corteva |
290 | 296 | (685 | ) | (113 | ) | (212 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
5 | | | (5 | ) | (e) | | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders |
$ | 285 | $ | 296 | $ | (685 | ) | $ | (108 | ) | $ | (212 | ) |
(1) |
See disclosures following these pro forma financial statements for further details regarding the Historical Adjustments. |
(2) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses, as well as the common control combination of Dow AgroSciences. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
75
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
Predecessor
Historical DuPont |
Discontinued
Operations |
Historical
Adjustments 1 |
Predecessor
Continuing Operations 2 |
Reclassification
Adjustments 1 |
Predecessor
Corteva Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||
As Reported | (subtotal) | As Adjusted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 14,290 | $ | (7,791 | ) | $ | | $ | 6,499 | $ | 54 | $ | 6,553 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
8,115 | (4,922 | ) | | 3,193 | 79 | 3,272 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating charges |
368 | (239 | ) | | 129 | (129 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
755 | (292 | ) | | 463 | | 463 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
2,446 | (963 | ) | | 1,483 | (205 | ) | 1,278 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
| | | | 33 | 33 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
312 | (308 | ) | | 4 | | 4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
| | | | 222 | 222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
70 | (336 | ) | | (266 | ) | (91 | ) | (357 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
183 | | | 183 | | 183 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
2,181 | (1,403 | ) | | 778 | (37 | ) | 741 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations |
281 | (646 | ) | | (365 | ) | (37 | ) | (402 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes |
1,900 | (757 | ) | | 1,143 | | 1,143 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
13 | (12 | ) | 5 | (e | ) | 6 | | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Corteva |
1,887 | (745 | ) | (5 | ) | 1,137 | | 1,137 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
5 | | (5 | ) | (e | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders |
$ | 1,882 | $ | (745 | ) | $ | | $ | 1,137 | $ | | $ | 1,137 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings per common share from continuing operations (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 2.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 2.16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
867.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
871.9 |
(1) |
See disclosures following these pro forma financial statements for further details regarding the Historical Adjustments and Reclassification Adjustments. |
(2) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
76
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income
For the Period January 1 Through August 31, 2017
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
Predecessor
Historical DuPont |
Discontinued
Operations |
Historical
Adjustments 1 |
Predecessor
Continuing Operations 2 |
Reclassification
Adjustments 1 |
Predecessor
Corteva Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||
As Reported | (subtotal) | As Adjusted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 17,281 | $ | (10,387 | ) | $ | | $ | 6,894 | $ | 60 | $ | 6,954 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
10,205 | (6,573 | ) | (163 | ) | (h) | 3,469 | 122 | 3,591 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other operating charges |
504 | (328 | ) | | 176 | (176 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
1,064 | (384 | ) | (45 | ) | (h) | 635 | | 635 | |||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
3,306 | (1,306 | ) | (89 | ) | (h) | 1,911 | (340 | ) | 1,571 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
| | | | 40 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
323 | (310 | ) | | 13 | | 13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
| | | | 354 | 354 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
166 | (366 | ) | (297 | ) | (h) | (497 | ) | (96 | ) | (593 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
254 | | | 254 | | 254 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
1,791 | (1,852 | ) | | (61 | ) | (36 | ) | (97 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations |
149 | (553 | ) | | (404 | ) | (36 | ) | (440 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes |
1,642 | (1,299 | ) | | 343 | | 343 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
18 | (17 | ) | 7 | (e) | 8 | | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Corteva |
1,624 | (1,282 | ) | (7 | ) | 335 | | 335 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
7 | | (7 | ) | (e) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders |
$ | 1,617 | $ | (1,282 | ) | $ | | $ | 335 | $ | | $ | 335 | |||||||||||||||
Earnings per common share from continuing operations (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.85 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
867.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
872.4 |
(1) |
See disclosures following these pro forma financial statements for further details regarding the Historical Adjustments and Reclassification Adjustments. |
(2) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
77
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income
For the Period September 1 Through December 31, 2017
(in millions) |
Successor
Historical DuPont |
Dow
AgroSciences 1 |
Discontinued
Operations |
Historical
Adjustments 2 |
Successor
Corteva Continuing Operations 3 |
|||||||||||||||||
As Reported | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 7,053 | $ | 2,227 | $ | (5,455 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | (a) | $ | 3,800 | |||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
6,165 | 1,510 | (4,734 | ) | 26 | (a)(h)(i) | 2,967 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
473 | 211 | (181 | ) | 12 | (h)(i) | 515 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
1,101 | 298 | (527 | ) | 15 | (h)(i) | 887 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
389 | 7 | (299 | ) | | 97 | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
180 | 182 | (109 | ) | 17 | (i) | 270 | |||||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
314 | | (110 | ) | 21 | (i) | 225 | |||||||||||||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
90 | 661 | (31 | ) | 99 | (h) | 819 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
107 | 35 | | | 142 | |||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes |
(1,586 | ) | 645 | 474 | (17 | ) | (484 | ) | ||||||||||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
(2,673 | ) | 471 | (7 | ) | (384 | ) | (g) | (2,593 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes |
1,087 | 174 | 481 | 367 | 2,109 | |||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| 7 | | 3 | (e) | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Corteva |
1,087 | 167 | 481 | 364 | 2,099 | |||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
3 | | | (3 | ) | (e) | | |||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders |
$ | 1,084 | $ | 167 | $ | 481 | $ | 367 | $ | 2,099 |
(1) |
For the post-Merger period September 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. |
(2) |
See disclosures following these pro forma financial statements for further details regarding the Historical Adjustments. |
(3) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses, as well as the common control combination of Dow AgroSciences. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
78
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2016
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
Predecessor
Historical DuPont |
Discontinued
Operations |
Historical
Adjustments 1 |
Predecessor
Continuing Operations 2 |
Reclassification
Adjustments 1 |
Predecessor
Corteva Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||||||||
As Reported | (subtotal) | As Adjusted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 23,209 | $ | (15,076 | ) | $ | | $ | 8,133 | $ | 132 | $ | 8,265 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
13,955 | (9,528 | ) | (14 | ) | (h) | 4,413 | 180 | 4,593 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other operating charges |
667 | (452 | ) | | 215 | (215 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
1,502 | (574 | ) | (3 | ) | (h) | 925 | | 925 | |||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
4,143 | (1,724 | ) | (8 | ) | (h) | 2,411 | (295 | ) | 2,116 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
| | | | 45 | 45 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
556 | (118 | ) | | 438 | | 438 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
| | | | 285 | 285 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Sundry incomenet |
707 | (608 | ) | (25 | ) | (h) | 74 | (124 | ) | (50 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
370 | | | 370 | | 370 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
2,723 | (3,288 | ) | | (565 | ) | 8 | (557 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations |
641 | (940 | ) | | (299 | ) | 8 | (291 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations after income taxes |
2,082 | (2,348 | ) | | (266 | ) | | (266 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
10 | (9 | ) | 10 | (e) | 11 | | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Corteva |
2,072 | (2,339 | ) | (10 | ) | (277 | ) | | (277 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
10 | | (10 | ) | (e) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders |
$ | 2,062 | $ | (2,339 | ) | $ | | $ | (277 | ) | $ | | $ | (277 | ) | |||||||||||||
Earnings per common share from continuing operations (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 2.36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 2.35 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
872.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
877.0 |
(1) |
See disclosures following these pro forma financial statements for further details regarding the Historical Adjustments and Reclassification Adjustments. |
(2) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
79
Corteva, Inc. Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Statement of Income
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
Predecessor
Historical DuPont |
Discontinued
Operations |
Historical
Adjustments 1 |
Predecessor
Corteva Continuing Operations 2 |
||||||||||||||||
As Reported | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 23,657 | $ | (15,331 | ) | $ | | $ | 8,326 | |||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
14,591 | (9,798 | ) | (167 | ) | (h | ) | 4,626 | ||||||||||||
Other operating charges |
434 | (433 | ) | | 1 | |||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
1,735 | (637 | ) | (56 | ) | (h | ) | 1,042 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
4,428 | (1,763 | ) | (149 | ) | (h | ) | 2,516 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
795 | (357 | ) | | 438 | |||||||||||||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
690 | (357 | ) | (372 | ) | (h | ) | (39 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
342 | | | 342 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
2,022 | (2,700 | ) | | (678 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations |
575 | (734 | ) | | (159 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations after income taxes |
1,447 | (1,966 | ) | | (519 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests |
4 | (2 | ) | 10 | (e | ) | 12 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Corteva |
1,443 | (1,964 | ) | (10 | ) | (531 | ) | |||||||||||||
Preferred stock dividends |
10 | | (10 | ) | (e | ) | | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Corteva common stockholders |
$ | 1,433 | $ | (1,964 | ) | $ | | $ | (531 | ) | ||||||||||
Earnings per common share from continuing operations (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.60 | ||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding (note 5): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
894.0 | |||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
899.5 |
(1) |
See disclosures following these pro forma financial statements for further details regarding the Historical Adjustments. |
(2) |
Represents the Companys current best estimate of Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements, reflecting the discontinued operations of Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. |
80
Historical Adjustments
The following pro forma adjustments are expected to be reflected in Cortevas retrospectively revised historical financial statements:
(a) |
Represents the elimination of intercompany transactions between Historical DuPont and Dow AgroSciences for the Successor periods, as if they were consolidated affiliates. The following tables summarize the intercompany elimination adjustments in the unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet and the unaudited pro forma combined statements of income: |
Balance Sheet
(in millions) |
As of
June 30, 2018 |
|||
Accounts and notes receivablenet |
$ | (40 | ) | |
Inventories |
(4 | ) | ||
Total assets |
$ | (44 | ) | |
Accounts payable |
$ | (42 | ) |
Statements of Income
(in millions) |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
For the Period
September 1- December 31, 2017 |
||||||
Net sales |
$ | (62 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | ||
Cost of goods sold |
(42 | ) | (8 | ) |
(b) |
It is anticipated that New DuPont will indemnify Corteva against certain litigation, environmental and employee-related liabilities that arose prior to the distribution. Within the unaudited pro forma consolidated balance sheet, these liabilities are included in the Successor Historical DuPont column and are removed in the Discontinued Operations column. The indemnified liabilities of $26 million and $41 million are included in accrued and other current liabilities and other noncurrent obligations, respectively, and the related indemnification assets of $26 million and $41 million are included in accounts and notes receivable, net and other assets, respectively. |
(c) |
Reflects the impact on deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities from jurisdictional netting and a reduction in deferred tax asset valuation allowances due to the assessment of Historical DuPont and Dow AgroSciences deferred tax assets, as if they were consolidated affiliates. |
(d) |
Adjustment to reflect the reclassification of the EID Preferred Stock from preferred stock to noncontrolling interests on the balance sheet, which remain outstanding and unaffected by the Merger, Business Realignment, Internal Reorganization and separation and distribution of Corteva. |
(e) |
Adjustment to reflect the reclassification of the dividends for EID Preferred Stock from preferred stock dividends to net income from continuing operations attributable to noncontrolling interests in the pro forma combined statements of income, which remain outstanding and unaffected by the Merger, Business Realignment, Internal Reorganization and separation and distribution of Corteva. |
(f) |
Reflects the impact to Cortevas retained earnings from pro forma adjustments described above. |
(g) |
Reflects the impact on the provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations for Corteva, as if Historical DuPont and Dow AgroSciences were consolidated affiliates for the Successor periods. For the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, an income tax benefit was recorded to reflect the |
81
removal of a $378 million valuation allowance for Dow AgroSciences that was established during the period, and to reflect the elimination of $6 million of tax expense related to intercompany inventory transactions. The valuation allowance was primarily related to a change in Dow AgroSciences ability, a direct result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the TCJA), to generate and rely on sufficient levels of future foreign source income when assessing its foreign tax credits for realizability. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, the consolidating adjustment reflects a provision of $92 million resulting from the effects of the U.S. tax consolidation, inclusive of the impact of the TCJA, and a benefit of $4 million to reflect the elimination of tax expense related to intercompany inventory transactions. |
(h) |
Represents the impact of the adoption of FASB Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2017-07, CompensationRetirement Benefits (Topic 715) , resulting in the following impact on the statements of operations: |
(in millions) |
For the Period
September 1 December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 August 31, 2017 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 54 | $ | (163 | ) | $ | (14 | ) | $ | (167 | ) | |||||
Research and development expenses |
$ | 15 | $ | (45 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (56 | ) | |||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | 30 | $ | (89 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (149 | ) | |||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
$ | 99 | $ | (297 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | $ | (372 | ) |
(i) |
In order to align the financial statement presentation of Dow AgroSciences to that of Cortevas continuing operations, certain reclassification adjustments have been made to the unaudited pro forma combined statements of income as follows: |
(in millions) |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
For the Period
September 1 December 31, 2017 |
||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | (3 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | ||
Research and development expenses |
$ | (1 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | ||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | ||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
$ | 6 | $ | 17 | ||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | (22 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | ||
Research and development expenses |
$ | (3 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | ||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | (13 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | ||
Integration and separation costs |
$ | 38 | $ | 21 |
Predecessor Reclassification Adjustments
For periods subsequent to the Merger, Successor Historical DuPonts historical statement of income conforms to the financial statement presentation of Corteva. In order to align the pro forma financial statement presentation of Predecessor Historical DuPonts continuing operations for periods prior to the Merger to that of Cortevas continuing operations, certain reclassification adjustments have been made to the Predecessor period pro forma statements of income.
82
The following table summarizes reclassifications made to the Predecessor period pro forma combined statements of income to conform to Cortevas Successor period pro forma statement of income presentation, and are presented for pro forma presentation alignment only and have not and will not be adjusted in the historical financial statements of Corteva for periods prior to the Merger:
(in millions) |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 August 31, 2017 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
|||||||||
Other operating charges (Predecessor Historical DuPont continuing operations) |
$ | (129 | ) | $ | (176 | ) | $ | (215 | ) | |||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 94 | $ | 137 | $ | 189 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | 35 | $ | 39 | $ | 26 | ||||||
Sundry (expense) incomenet (Predecessor Historical DuPont continuing operations) |
$ | (91 | ) | $ | (96 | ) | $ | (124 | ) | |||
Net sales |
$ | 54 | $ | 60 | $ | 132 | ||||||
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes on continuing operations 1 |
$ | 37 | $ | 36 | $ | (8 | ) | |||||
Predecessor Historical DuPont amortization of intangibles, continuing operations: |
||||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | (15 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | |||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | (18 | ) | $ | (25 | ) | $ | (36 | ) | |||
Amortization of intangibles |
$ | 33 | $ | 40 | $ | 45 | ||||||
Predecessor Historical DuPont integration and separation costs, continuing operations: |
||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | (222 | ) | $ | (354 | ) | $ | (285 | ) | |||
Integration and separation costs 2 |
$ | 222 | $ | 354 | $ | 285 |
(1) |
Reflects the reclassification of interest associated with uncertain tax positions to (Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations. |
(2) |
Reflects the reclassification of expenses related to the Merger as Integration and separation costs. Merger-related costs include costs incurred to prepare for and close the Merger, post-Merger integration expenses, and costs incurred to prepare for the separation of the agriculture business, specialty products business and materials science business. These costs primarily consist of financial advisory, information technology, legal, accounting, consulting, and other professional advisory fees associated with preparation and execution of these activities. |
83
SUPPLEMENTAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
PRO FORMA SEGMENT RESULTS
The information below presents the pro forma segment results of Corteva, after giving effect to the Merger, Business Realignment, Internal Reorganization, and separation and distribution transactions, as if they occurred on January 1, 2016.
The unaudited pro forma segment information was prepared in accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X. The unaudited pro forma segment results provide shareholders with summary financial information and historical data that is on a basis consistent with how we will report financial information in the future. The unaudited pro forma segment information is for informational purposes only and does not purport to represent what the segment results would have been had the Merger, Internal Reorganization, and the separation and distribution transactions occurred on the dates indicated, or to project the financial performance for any future periods.
Cortevas operating segments will be seed and crop protection as this represents the level at which the chief operating decision maker (CODM) will assess performance and allocate resources. Operating EBITDA will be the primary measure of segment profitability used by Cortevas CODM. For purposes of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 and the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, Operating EBITDA is calculated on a pro forma basis. The company defines Operating EBITDA as earnings (i.e., income from continuing operations before income taxes) before interest, depreciation, amortization, corporate expenses, non-operating costs, net and foreign exchange gains (losses), excluding the impact of adjusted significant items. Non-operating costs, net consists of non-operating pension and other post-employment benefit (OPEB) costs, environmental remediation and legal costs associated with legacy businesses and sites of Historical DuPont.
84
Seed
(in millions) |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
||||||
Pro forma net sales |
$ | 8,066 | $ | 7,842 | ||||
Pro forma Operating EBITDA |
$ | 1,204 | $ | 1,013 |
(in millions) |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||
Pro forma net sales |
$ | 6,169 | $ | 6,365 | ||||
Pro forma Operating EBITDA |
$ | 1,604 | $ | 1,748 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
||||
Change in pro forma net sales from prior period due to: |
||||
Local price and product mix |
1 | % | ||
Currency |
1 | % | ||
Volume |
1 | % | ||
Portfolio and other |
| |||
Total |
3 | % |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
||||
Change in pro forma net sales from prior period due to: |
||||
Local price and product mix |
2 | % | ||
Currency |
1 | % | ||
Volume |
(6 | )% | ||
Portfolio and other |
| |||
Total |
(3 | )% |
2017 versus 2016
Seed pro forma net sales were $8,066 million in 2017, up from $7,842 million in 2016. Pro forma net sales growth of 3 percent was driven by 1 percent gains in local price and product mix, volume and currency. Increases in local prices were driven by continued penetration of Pioneer ® brand hybrids with Leptra ® insect protection technology, Pioneer Protector ® products for sunflower, and Pioneer brand Optimum ® AQUAmax ® corn hybrids. Volume growth was driven by an increase in sunflower and corn seed sales in Europe and increased soybean sales in North America. These volume increases were partially offset by a reduction in global corn planted area, particularly in North America.
Pro forma Operating EBITDA was $1,204 million in 2017, up 19 percent from $1,013 million in 2016. Pro forma Operating EBITDA increased on growth in local prices and product mix, improved volume, currency and cost savings. Increases were partially offset by higher product costs, including higher soybean royalties.
Six months ended June 30, 2018 versus June 30, 2017
Seed pro forma net sales were $6,169 million for the first six months of 2018, down from $6,365 million for the first six months of 2017. Pro forma net sales declines of 3 percent, reflected a 2 percent gain in local price and product mix and a one percent gain in currency, offset by volume declines of 6 percent. Declines in volume
85
were driven by lower expected planted area in North America and a reduction in safrinha area in Brazil. The increase in local price was driven by continued penetration of new corn hybrids and A-Series soybeans.
Pro forma Operating EBITDA was $1,604 million for the first six months of 2018, down 8 percent from $1,748 million for the first six months of 2017. Cost synergies and favorable currency were more than offset by higher soybean royalty costs, the weak safrinha season in Brazil, and investments to support new product launches and digital platforms.
Crop Protection
(in millions) |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2017 |
For the
Year Ended December 31, 2016 |
||||||
Pro forma net sales |
$ | 6,056 | $ | 6,075 | ||||
Pro forma Operating EBITDA |
$ | 943 | $ | 916 |
(in millions) |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||
Pro forma net sales |
$ | 3,304 | $ | 3,180 | ||||
Pro forma Operating EBITDA |
$ | 735 | $ | 630 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2017 |
||||
Change in pro forma net sales from prior period due to: |
||||
Local price and product mix |
(3 | )% | ||
Currency |
| |||
Volume |
3 | % | ||
Portfolio and other |
| |||
Total |
|
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2018 |
||||
Change in pro forma net sales from prior period due to: |
||||
Local price and product mix |
3 | % | ||
Currency |
3 | % | ||
Volume |
(2 | )% | ||
Portfolio and other |
| |||
Total |
4 | % |
2017 versus 2016
Crop Protection pro forma net sales were $6,056 million in 2017, down from $6,075 million in 2016. Pro forma net sales were essentially flat driven by a 3 percent decline in local price and product mix, mostly offset by volume gains of 3 percent. The decrease in local price and product mix was driven by competitive pressures in Latin America, while volume growth was driven by continued penetration of new crop protection products VESSARYA ® and ZORVEC ® fungicides and continued demand for ARYLEX ® herbicide, ISOCLAST ® insecticide, and novel seed treatment solutions. These volume increases were partially offset by higher inventory levels in China.
86
Pro forma Operating EBITDA was $943 million in 2017, up 3 percent from $916 million in 2016. Pro forma Operating EBITDA increased on improved volume and cost savings and was partially offset by lower local prices due to competitive crop protection pricing pressure.
Six months ended June 30, 2018 versus June 30, 2017
Crop Protection pro forma net sales were $3,304 million for the first six months of 2018, up from $3,180 million for the first six months of 2017. The 4 percent increase in pro forma net sales was driven by 3 percent gains in both local price and product mix and currency, partially offset by a 2 percent decline in volumes. Increases in local prices were driven by continuing efforts to capture value in established brands across the Crop Protection portfolio globally. The declines in volumes were driven by the loss of the Picoxystrobin registration in Europe, and were partly offset by new product launches such as ARYLEX TM herbicides and ISOCLAST ® , PYRAXALT TM and SPINOSYN TM insecticides.
Pro forma Operating EBITDA was $735 million for the first six month of 2018, up 17 percent from $630 million for the first six months of 2017. Pro forma Operating EBITDA increased on cost synergies and sales gains from new product launches, partly offset by investments to support new product launches.
Reconciliation of Pro Forma Income from Continuing Operations After Income Taxes to Segment Pro Forma Operating EBITDA
For the
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Pro forma income from continuing operations after income taxes |
$ | 2,230 | $ | 334 | ||||
Benefit from income taxes on continuing operations |
(3,125 | ) | (375 | ) | ||||
Pro forma loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
(895 | ) | (41 | ) | ||||
+ Depreciation and amortization |
816 | 758 | ||||||
Interest income |
(109 | ) | (109 | ) | ||||
+ Interest expense |
342 | 280 | ||||||
+ Exchange lossesnet |
373 | 207 | ||||||
+ Corporate expenses |
148 | 175 | ||||||
+ Non-operating costsnet |
265 | 92 | ||||||
+ Significant items |
1,207 | 567 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Segment pro forma Operating EBITDA |
$ | 2,147 | $ | 1,929 |
For the
Six Months Ended June 30 |
||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Pro forma income from continuing operations after income taxes |
$ | 843 | $ | 1,213 | ||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations |
135 | (484 | ) | |||||
Pro forma income from continuing operations before income taxes |
978 | 729 | ||||||
+ Depreciation and amortization |
480 | 404 | ||||||
Interest income |
(52 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||
+ Interest expense |
187 | 138 | ||||||
+ Exchange lossesnet |
116 | 162 | ||||||
+ Corporate expenses |
84 | 65 | ||||||
/+ Non-operating (benefits) costsnet |
(105 | ) | 258 | |||||
+ Significant items |
651 | 678 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Segment pro forma Operating EBITDA |
$ | 2,339 | $ | 2,378 |
87
Adjusted Significant Items
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
Crop
Protection |
Seeds | Corporate |
Crop
Protection |
Seeds | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||
Bayer CropScience arbitration |
$ | | $ | 469 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Customer claim adjustment/recovery |
| | | (53 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Environmental charges |
| | | 2 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
| | 466 | | | 165 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related (benefits) chargesnet |
(2 | ) | 133 | 141 | 69 | 27 | 357 | |||||||||||||||||
Total significant items |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | 602 | $ | 607 | $ | 18 | $ | 27 | $ | 522 |
For the Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2018 | 2017 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
Crop
Protection |
Seeds | Corporate |
Crop
Protection |
Seeds | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||
Bayer CropScience arbitration |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 469 | $ | | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
| (24 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
| | 444 | | | 206 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
12 | 84 | 135 | | | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total significant items |
$ | 12 | $ | 60 | $ | 579 | $ | | $ | 469 | $ | 209 |
88
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table presents Cortevas selected historical condensed consolidated financial data based on that of Historical DuPont. The selected historical condensed consolidated financial data has been derived from the financial information contained in Historical DuPonts annual and interim financial statements for the periods shown, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibits 99.2 and 99.3, respectively, to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part. In connection with the Merger, the assets and liabilities of Historical DuPont were measured at fair value under the acquisition method of accounting. Historical DuPont elected to apply pushdown accounting, thereby requiring that the assets and liabilities reflect their fair value at the date of the Merger. As a result of the change in the cost basis of these assets and liabilities, and the alignment of our accounting policies and financial statement presentation to DowDuPonts, the historical financial statements and the related disclosures of Corteva, which are that of Historical DuPont, present pre-Merger activity as the Predecessor and post-Merger activity as the Successor. Accordingly, the financial position, results of operations, and cash flows and related disclosures for the Predecessor and Successor periods are separated by a black line division, indicating that the pre-Merger and post-Merger periods are not comparable.
For a better understanding, this section should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, the unaudited pro forma combined financial statements and accompanying notes, and the annual and interim financial statements and accompanying notes, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibits 99.2 and 99.3, respectively, to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
(Dollars in millions) | Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For the
Period September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the
Period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2014 (unaudited) |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2013 (unaudited) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Summary of operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 7,053 | $ | 17,281 | $ | 23,209 | $ | 23,657 | $ | 26,612 | $ | 27,333 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
$ | 180 | $ | 323 | $ | 556 | $ | 795 | $ | 472 | $ | 112 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | (1,586 | ) | $ | 1,791 | $ | 2,723 | $ | 2,022 | $ | 3,564 | $ | 1,857 | |||||||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
$ | (2,673 | ) | $ | 149 | $ | 641 | $ | 575 | $ | 1,021 | $ | 289 | |||||||||||
Net income attributable to DuPont |
$ | 1,010 | $ | 1,741 | $ | 2,513 | $ | 1,953 | $ | 3,625 | $ | 4,848 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock from continuing operations |
$ | 1.86 | $ | 2.36 | $ | 1.60 | $ | 2.76 | $ | 1.67 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock from continuing operations |
$ | 1.85 | $ | 2.35 | $ | 1.59 | $ | 2.74 | $ | 1.66 | ||||||||||||||
General: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment and investments in affiliates |
$ | 431 | $ | 709 | $ | 1,038 | $ | 1,705 | $ | 2,062 | $ | 1,940 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 426 | $ | 589 | $ | 907 | $ | 948 | $ | 975 | $ | 996 | ||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
$ | 473 | $ | 1,064 | $ | 1,502 | $ | 1,735 | $ | 1,779 | $ | 1,857 | ||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (millions): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
868 | 873 | 894 | 915 | 926 | |||||||||||||||||||
Diluted |
872 | 877 | 900 | 922 | 933 | |||||||||||||||||||
Dividends per common share |
$ | 1.14 | $ | 1.52 | $ | 1.72 | $ | 1.84 | $ | 1.78 |
89
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
For the six
months ended June 30, 2018 |
For the six
months ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||
Summary of operations: |
||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 15,244 | $ | 14,290 | ||||
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet |
$ | 188 | $ | 312 | ||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 466 | $ | 2,181 | ||||
Provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
$ | 168 | $ | 281 | ||||
Net income attributable to DuPont |
$ | 285 | $ | 1,975 | ||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock from continuing operations |
$ | 2.17 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock from continuing operations |
$ | 2.16 | ||||||
General: |
||||||||
Purchases of property, plant and equipment and investments in affiliates |
$ | 601 | $ | 546 | ||||
Depreciation |
$ | 666 | $ | 446 | ||||
Research and development expenses |
$ | 778 | $ | 755 | ||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (millions): |
||||||||
Basic |
867 | |||||||
Diluted |
872 | |||||||
Dividends per common share |
$ | 0.76 |
(Dollars in millions) | Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||||||
As of December 31, |
2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
2014
(unaudited) |
2013
(unaudited) |
|||||||||||||||
Financial position: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Working capital 1 |
$ | 10,912 | $ | 7,866 | $ | 6,618 | $ | 7,756 | $ | 10,055 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 112,964 | $ | 39,964 | $ | 41,166 | $ | 50,490 | $ | 52,142 | ||||||||||
Borrowings and capital lease obligations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current |
$ | 2,779 | $ | 429 | $ | 1,165 | $ | 1,422 | $ | 1,721 | ||||||||||
Long term |
$ | 10,291 | $ | 8,107 | $ | 7,642 | $ | 9,233 | $ | 10,699 | ||||||||||
Total equity |
$ | 74,932 | $ | 10,196 | $ | 10,200 | $ | 13,378 | $ | 16,286 |
(1) |
Working capital has been restated to exclude the assets and liabilities related to the Performance Chemicals segment and the Divested Ag Business. The assets and liabilities related to the Performance Chemicals business and the Divested Ag Business are presented as assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented. Additionally, working capital as of December 31, 2013, includes cash received from the sale of the Performance Coatings business. See note 4 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further information. |
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
June 30,
2018 |
June 30,
2017 |
||||||
Financial position: |
||||||||
Working capital 1 |
$ | 9,278 | $ | 9,325 | ||||
Total assets |
$ | 108,010 | $ | 43,206 | ||||
Borrowings and capital lease obligations |
||||||||
Current |
$ | 3,701 | $ | 3,473 | ||||
Long term |
$ | 9,728 | $ | 10,086 | ||||
Total equity |
$ | 72,767 | $ | 12,594 |
(1) |
Working capital has been restated to exclude the assets and liabilities related to the Divested Ag Business. |
90
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
You should read the following in conjunction with the sections in this information statements entitled Risk Factors, Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements, Selected Historical Consolidated Financial Data, Merger, Intended Separations, Reorganization and Financial Statement Presentation, The Distribution, Unaudited Pro Forma Combined Financial Statements, Business and Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution as well as the Historical DuPont annual and interim financial statements and related notes thereto, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibits 99.2 and 99.3, respectively, to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
The managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) of Cortevas historical financial condition and results of operations presented below is that of Historical DuPont. The following refers to and should be read in conjunction with the annual and interim consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibits 99.2 and 99.3, respectively, to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part. This MD&A has been included to help provide an understanding of Historical DuPonts financial condition, changes in financial condition and results of operations.
The financial information and results of operations that are discussed in this section relate to Historical DuPont. Consequently, the discussion in this section relates to Historical DuPont as it is currently comprised, without giving effect to the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment and the other transactions that will occur in connection with the separation and distribution. The discussion in this section therefore includes Historical DuPonts materials science and specialty products businesses, and does not reflect Corteva as it will be constituted following the separation as a pure-play agriculture company. As a result, the discussion does not necessarily reflect the expected financial position, results of operations or cash flows of Corteva following the separation or what Cortevas financial position, results of operations and cash flows would have been had Corteva been an independent, publicly traded company during the periods presented. See the section entitled Merger, Reorganization and Financial Statement Presentation, The Separation and Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution for a discussion of the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment and the related transactions in connection with the separation and distribution.
The following discussion may contain forward-looking statements that reflect the plans, estimates and beliefs of Historical DuPont. The words plans, expects, will, anticipates, believes, intends, projects, estimates or other words of similar meaning and similar expressions, among others, generally identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statements were made. The matters discussed in these forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements.
Factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those anticipated include the matters described under the sections entitled Risk Factors, Business, and Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements. We disclaim and do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, except as required by applicable law.
Recent Developments
Principal U.S. Pension Plan Contribution
In the third quarter of 2018, Historical DuPont made a discretionary contribution of $1,100 million to its principal U.S. pension plan.
Impairment and Valuation Allowance
Historical DuPont tests goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually during the fourth quarter or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value may be below its
91
carrying value. In connection with the Merger and the related accounting determination, Historical DuPont elected to apply push-down accounting and reflect in its financial statements the fair value of its assets and liabilities. Therefore, Historical DuPonts reporting units became more susceptible to impairment for any decline in fair value since the Merger.
During the third quarter of 2018 and in connection with strategic business reviews, Historical DuPont assembled updated cash flow projections. The revised cash flow projections of Historical DuPonts agriculture reporting unit reflect the anticipated impacts of events and circumstances that have developed during 2018, resulting in a reduction in the long-term forecasts of sales and profitability as compared to prior forecasts. The reduction in cash flow projections was principally driven by lower growth in sales and margins in North America and Latin America and unfavorable currency impacts related to the Brazilian real. The lower growth expectation is driven by reduced planted area, an expected unfavorable shift to soybeans from corn in Latin America, and delays in expected product registrations. In addition, decrease in commodity prices and higher than anticipated industry grain inventories are expected to impact farmers income and buying choices resulting in shifts to lower technologies and pricing pressure.
Historical DuPont considered the combination of these events and circumstances in 2018, and the resulting reduction in its cash flow projections for its agriculture reporting unit, to be a triggering event that required Historical DuPont to perform an impairment analysis of its agriculture reporting units goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets as of September 30, 2018. In reviewing the indefinite-lived intangible assets, Historical DuPont also determined that the fair value of certain in-process research and development assets had declined as a result of delays in timing of commercialization and increases to expected research and development costs. As a result of the analysis performed, as of September 30, 2018, Historical DuPont recorded pre-tax (and after-tax), non-cash impairment charges of about $4.5 billion for goodwill and $0.1 billion for certain indefinite-lived assets associated with its agriculture reporting unit.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2018, Historical DuPont expects to record a tax provision charge of approximately $75 million for a valuation allowance against the net deferred tax asset position of a Brazilian legal entity and a pre-tax (and after-tax) charge of approximately $40 million for an other-than-temporary impairment of certain non-consolidated affiliates in China, respectively. These charges are primarily due to the impact of the 2018 events and circumstances discussed above.
Overview of Historical DuPont
Historical DuPont was founded in 1802 and incorporated in Delaware in 1915. Historical DuPont has helped customers find solutions to capitalize on areas of growing global demand and enabled more, safer, nutritious food; created high-performance, cost-effective and energy efficient materials for a wide range of industries; and increasingly delivered renewably sourced bio-based materials and fuels. Historical DuPonts total worldwide employment at December 31, 2017 was approximately 44,000 people. As of December 31, 2017, Historical DuPont had subsidiaries in approximately 90 countries worldwide and manufacturing operations in approximately 50 countries.
Tax Reform
On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was enacted. The TCJA reduces the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax (transition tax) on earnings of foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, creates new provisions related to foreign sourced earnings, eliminates the domestic manufacturing deduction and moves to a territorial system. In the fourth quarter of 2017, Historical DuPont recorded a net benefit in provision for taxes on continuing operations of $2.0 billion, which consisted of a provisional net benefit of $2.7 billion due to the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate, partially offset by a provisional charge of $715 million due to the transition tax. At June 30, 2018, Historical DuPont had not yet completed its accounting for the tax effects of enactment of the TCJA; however, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, Historical DuPont recorded charges of
92
$7 million and $55 million, respectively, to provision for income taxes on continuing operations with respect to the remeasurement of Historical DuPonts deferred tax balance. In addition, Historical DuPont recorded a charge of $16 million associated with an indirect impact of the TCJA related to certain inventory for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Historical DuPont continues to refine its calculations as additional information and guidance becomes available.
DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program
In September and November 2017, DowDuPont and Historical DuPont approved post-merger restructuring actions to achieve targeted cost synergies under the Synergy Program, adopted by the DowDuPont Board of Directors. The plan is designed to integrate and optimize the organization following the Merger and in preparation for the Intended Business Separations. Based on all actions approved to date under the Synergy Program, Historical DuPont expects to record total pre-tax restructuring charges of $430 million to $600 million, comprised of approximately $320 million to $360 million of severance and related benefits costs; $110 million to $140 million of costs related to contract terminations; and up to $100 million of asset related charges. The Synergy Program includes certain asset actions that are reflected in the preliminary fair value measurement of Historical DuPonts assets as of the Merger date. Substantially all of the remaining restructuring charges are expected to be incurred in 2018 and the related actions, including employee separations, associated with this plan are expected to be substantially complete by the end of 2019.
Future cash payments related to this program are anticipated to be approximately $330 million to $400 million, primarily related to the payment of severance and related benefits and contract termination costs. It is possible that additional charges and future cash payments could occur in relation to the restructuring actions. Historical DuPont anticipates including savings associated with these actions within DowDuPonts cost synergy commitment of $3.3 billion associated with the Merger.
Tyvek ® Capacity Expansion
In June 2018, Historical DuPont announced plans to invest more than $400 million in its safety and construction product line to increase capacity for the manufacture of Tyvek ® nonwoven materials at its Luxembourg site due to growing global demand. The production expansion, which includes investment in a new building and a third operating line at the site, is scheduled to occur over the next three years, with commercial production expected to begin in 2021.
Impact of Recently Enacted Tariffs
Certain countries where Historical DuPonts products are manufactured, distributed or sold have recently enacted or are considering imposing new tariffs on certain products. Historical DuPont has analyzed the potential impact from tariffs that took effect on July 6, 2018 and does not expect such tariffs will have a material impact on its results of operations in 2018 because of Historical DuPonts mitigation actions and its global asset base. Historical DuPont will continue to monitor the situation and take actions, where possible, to mitigate any potential impact as events unfold.
Note on Financial Presentation
For purposes of DowDuPonts financial statement presentation, Dow was determined to be the accounting acquirer in the Merger and Historical DuPonts assets and liabilities are reflected at fair value as of the time of the Merger. In connection with the Merger and the related accounting determination, Historical DuPont has elected to apply push-down accounting and reflect in its financial statements the fair value of its assets and liabilities. Historical DuPonts consolidated financial statements for periods following the closing of the Merger are labeled Successor and reflect DowDuPonts basis in the fair values of the assets and liabilities of Historical DuPont. All periods prior to the closing of the Merger reflect the historical accounting basis in Historical DuPonts assets and liabilities and are
93
labeled Predecessor. The interim consolidated financial statements and footnotes include a black line division between the columns titled Predecessor and Successor to signify that the amounts shown for the periods prior to and following the Merger are not comparable. In addition, Historical DuPont has elected to make certain changes in presentation to harmonize its accounting and reporting with that of DowDuPont in the Successor period. See note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Historical DuPonts annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further discussion of these changes and note 3 to the interim consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional information on the Merger.
Results of Operations for Historical DuPont June 30, 2018 versus June 30, 2017
Net Sales
Net sales were $8.5 billion and $7.0 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The change was primarily driven by 29 percent higher sales in U.S. & Canada, mainly driven by recovery from weather-related delays to the start of the planting seasons in the Northern Hemisphere in the agriculture product line. Sales also increased in EMEA and Asia Pacific driven by higher volume and currency benefits in those regions.
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 | Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in billions) | Net Sales |
% of
Net Sales |
Net Sales |
% of
Net Sales |
||||||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 8.5 | 100 | % | $ | 7.0 | 100 | % | ||||||||
U.S. & Canada |
4.8 | 56 | % | 3.7 | 53 | % | ||||||||||
Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA) |
1.5 | 18 | % | 1.3 | 18 | % | ||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
1.7 | 20 | % | 1.5 | 22 | % | ||||||||||
Latin America |
0.5 | 6 | % | 0.5 | 7 | % |
Net sales were $15.2 billion and $14.3 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The change was primarily driven by sales increases in EMEA and Asia Pacific of 17 percent and 12 percent, respectively, driven by higher volume and currency benefits in those regions.
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in billions) | Net Sales |
% of
Net Sales |
Net Sales |
% of
Net Sales |
||||||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 15.2 | 100 | % | $ | 14.3 | 100 | % | ||||||||
U.S. & Canada |
7.3 | 48 | % | 7.2 | 51 | % | ||||||||||
Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA) |
3.7 | 25 | % | 3.2 | 22 | % | ||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
3.2 | 21 | % | 2.9 | 20 | % | ||||||||||
Latin America |
1.0 | 6 | % | 1.0 | 7 | % |
In the interim consolidated income statements, royalty income is included within net sales in the Successor periods and is included in sundry income (expense)net in the Predecessor periods. Royalty income does not have a significant impact on any period presented.
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)
COGS was $5.7 billion and $4.0 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The change was primarily driven by the amortization of the inventory step-up of $682 million during the second quarter of 2018. COGS also increased due to the elimination of the other operating charges financial statement line item in the Successor period, higher depreciation related to the fair value step up of property, plant and equipment, and higher sales volume.
94
COGS as a percentage of net sales was 66 percent and 57 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amortization of the inventory step-up was eight percent of net sales in the Successor period. The remaining COGS increase as a percentage of net sales in the Successor period is due to the items discussed above.
COGS was $10.5 billion and $8.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The change was primarily driven by the amortization of the inventory step-up of $1.4 billion during the first half of 2018 as well as increased expenses due to the elimination of the other operating charges financial statement line item in the Successor period and higher depreciation related to the fair value step up of property, plant and equipment.
COGS as a percentage of net sales was 69 percent and 57 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amortization of the inventory step-up was nine percent of net sales in the Successor period. The remaining COGS increase as a percentage of net sales in the Successor period is due to the items discussed above.
See note 3 to the interim consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional information regarding the Merger, including the valuation of inventory.
Other Operating Charges
Other operating charges were $168 million and $368 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. In the Successor periods, other operating charges are included primarily in COGS, as well as selling, general and administrative expenses, and amortization of intangibles.
Research and Development Expense (R&D)
R&D expense was $396 million and $387 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. R&D as a percentage of net sales was five percent and six percent for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
R&D expense was $778 million and $755 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. R&D as a percentage of net sales was five percent and five percent for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
The changes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 were primarily driven by an increase in R&D expense for the agriculture and health and nutrition product lines.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (SG&A)
SG&A expenses were $1.2 billion and $1.3 billion for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In the Successor periods, integration and separation costs and amortization of intangibles are presented as line items on the interim consolidated income statement. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, Historical DuPont incurred $201 million of transaction costs in connection with the Merger and the Intended Business Separations.
SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 14 percent and 18 percent for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Transaction costs were three percent of net sales for the three months ended June 30, 2017.
SG&A expenses were $2.1 billion and $2.4 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, Historical DuPont incurred $371 million of transaction costs in connection with the Merger and the Intended Business Separations.
95
SG&A as a percentage of net sales was 14 percent and 17 percent for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Transaction costs were three percent of net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Amortization of Intangibles
Intangible asset amortization was $333 million and $648 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. In the Predecessor periods, amortization of intangibles was included within SG&A, other operating charges, R&D and COGS. See note 3 to the interim consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further information regarding the Merger, including the valuation of intangible assets.
Restructuring and Asset Related ChargesNet
Restructuring and asset related chargesnet were $91 million and $160 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The majority of the activity in the second quarter of 2018 related to the Synergy Program. The charges in the second quarter of 2017 related to the closure of the safety and construction product line at the Cooper River manufacturing site located near Charleston, South Carolina as part of the 2017 restructuring program.
Restructuring and asset related chargesnet were $188 million and $312 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The majority of the activity in the first half of 2018 related to the Synergy Program, as Historical DuPont recorded pre-tax charges of $94 million and $191 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. The charges in the first half of 2017 related to the 2017 restructuring program.
See note 6 to the interim consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional information.
Integration and Separation Costs
Integration and separation costs were $327 million and $582 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. In the Predecessor periods, integration and separation costs were included within SG&A. See note 1 to the interim consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further discussion of the changes in presentation.
Sundry Income (Expense)Net
Sundry income (expense)net was income of $194 million and expense of $132 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The three months ended June 30, 2018 included exchange gains of $23 million, interest income of $30 million and a non-operating pension and other post-employment benefit credit of $95 million. The non-operating pension and other post-employment benefit credit in the second quarter of 2018 was a result of the absence of the amortization of net losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss. The three months ended June 30, 2017 included a net exchange loss of $140 million and non-operating pension and other post-employment benefit costs of $104 million. These losses were offset by interest income of $32 million and royalty income of $28 million.
Sundry income (expense)net was income $241 million and $70 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The six months ended June 30, 2018 included a net exchange loss of $109 million, offset by a non-operating pension and other post-employment benefit credit of $187 million and interest income of $58 million. The six months ended June 30, 2017 included a net exchange loss of $199 million and non-operating pension and other post-employment benefit costs of $208 million. These losses were partially offset by a pre-tax gain of $162 million associated with the sale of the global food safety diagnostics business, interest income of $57 million and the inclusion of royalty income of $73 million in the Predecessor period.
96
See note 8 to the interim consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional information.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $86 million and $99 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Interest expense was $166 million and $183 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The changes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 were primarily driven by debt amortization as a result of reflecting Historical DuPonts debt at fair value upon the effective date of the Merger, partially offset by higher average debt balances.
Provision for Income Taxes on Continuing Operations
Historical DuPonts provision for income taxes on continuing operations was $141 million for the second quarter of 2018 on pre-tax income from continuing operations of $655 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 21.5 percent. The effective tax rate was favorably impacted by the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent. Other favorable effective tax rate impacts related to costs associated with the Merger and restructuring and asset related charges as well as geographic mix of earnings were offset by unfavorable effective tax rate impacts associated with non-tax-deductible amortization of the fair value step-up in Historical DuPonts inventories as a result of the Merger, the tax impact of certain net exchange losses recognized on the re-measurement of the net monetary asset positions which were not deductible in their local jurisdictions, and an incremental net provisional charge of $7 million associated with the enactment of the TCJA.
Historical DuPonts provision for income taxes on continuing operations was $84 million for the second quarter of 2017 on pre-tax income of $806 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 10.4 percent. The effective tax rate was favorably impacted by certain net exchange gains recognized on the re-measurement of the net monetary asset positions which were not taxable in their local jurisdictions, as well as the impact of the costs associated with the Merger and related activities. These impacts were partially offset by a tax charge of $29 million related to the elimination of a tax benefit originally recorded in 2016 due to a second quarter of 2017 U.S. discretionary pension contribution.
Historical DuPonts provision for income taxes on continuing operations was $168 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 on pre-tax income from continuing operations of $466 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 36.1 percent. The effective tax rate was unfavorably impacted by non-tax-deductible amortization of the fair value step-up in Historical DuPonts inventories as a result of the Merger, in addition to an incremental net provisional charge of $55 million associated with the enactment of the TCJA. These unfavorable impacts were partially offset by favorable impacts associated with the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, as well as the impact of costs associated with the Merger and restructuring and asset related charges.
Historical DuPonts provision for income taxes on continuing operations was $281 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 on pre-tax income of $2,181 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 12.9 percent. The effective tax rate was favorably impacted by certain net exchange gains recognized on the re-measurement of the net monetary asset positions which were not taxable in their local jurisdictions. Other favorable effective tax rate impacts include tax benefits related to a reduction in Historical DuPonts unrecognized tax benefits due to the closure of various tax statutes of limitations, the impact of costs associated with the Merger and restructuring and asset related charges, as well as geographic mix of earnings. These impacts were partially offset by the unfavorable tax consequences of non-deductible goodwill associated with the gain on the sale of Historical DuPonts global food safety diagnostic business in the first quarter of 2017.
Overview2017 and 2016
Net sales were $7.1 billion for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 and $17.3 billion for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, compared to $23.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016. The
97
$1.1 billion increase was primarily driven by 4 percent higher sales volume as worldwide local price and currency were both flat. (Loss) income from continuing operations before taxes was $(1.6) billion, $1.8 billion, and $2.7 billion for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively.
The period September 1 through December 31, 2017 results include $1.5 billion of amortization of inventory step-up, increased transaction costs related to the Merger and distributions, higher depreciation related to the fair value step up of property, plant and equipment and lower gains from sales of businesses, partially offset by higher sales. Pension and other postemployment benefits (OPEB) (benefits) costs for the period of September 1 through December 31, 2017 and January 1 through August 31, 2017 were $(83) million and $373 million, respectively, as compared to $222 million in 2016. Activity in the Successor period benefited from the absence of the amortization of net losses from accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL). Pension and OPEB costs for 2016 include a curtailment gain as a result of changes made to the U.S. pension and OPEB benefits in 2016.
Historical DuPont Analysis of Operations2017 and 2016
Note on Financial Presentation
In connection with the Merger, Historical DuPont applied the acquisition method of accounting as of September 1, 2017, and the financial statements reflect the preliminary-related adjustments. As a result, financial information for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 (2017 Predecessor) and the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 (Successor) are not comparable to the financial information for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (together with 2017 Predecessor, Predecessor). In addition, Historical DuPont has elected to make certain changes in presentation to harmonize its accounting and reporting with that of DowDuPont in the Successor period. See notes 1 and 3 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further discussion of these changes and additional information regarding the Merger, respectively.
FMC Transactions
On March 31, 2017, Historical DuPont and FMC Corporation (FMC) entered a definitive agreement (the FMC Transaction Agreement). Under the FMC Transaction Agreement, FMC agreed to acquire certain assets of the crop protection business and research and development assets that Historical DuPont was required to divest in order to obtain the European Commissions approval of the merger agreement, (the Divested Ag Business) and Historical DuPont agreed to acquire certain assets relating to the H&N Business (collectively, the FMC Transactions). The sale of the Divested Ag Business meets the criteria for discontinued operations and, as such, earnings are included within (loss) income from discontinued operations after income taxes for all periods presented.
On November 1, 2017, Historical DuPont completed the FMC Transactions through the disposition of the Divested Ag Business and the acquisition of the H&N Business. The preliminary fair value as determined by Historical DuPont of the H&N Business is $1,970 million. The FMC Transactions include a cash consideration payment to Historical DuPont of approximately $1,200 million, which reflects the difference in value between the Divested Ag Business and the H&N Business, as well as favorable contracts with FMC of $495 million, subject to adjustments for inventory of the Divested Ag Business and net working capital of the H&N Business. Due to the proximity of the Merger and the closing of the sale, the carrying value of the Divested Ag Business approximates the fair value of the consideration received, thus no resulting gain or loss was recognized on the sale. Refer to note 3 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further information on the H&N Business.
98
Tax Reform
At December 31, 2017, Historical DuPont had not completed its accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA; however, in the fourth quarter of 2017, Historical DuPont recorded a net benefit in provision for income taxes on continuing operations of $2,001 million, which consisted of a provisional net benefit of $2,716 million due to the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate partially offset by a provisional charge of $715 million due to the transition tax. Historical DuPont expects that it will have sufficient available foreign tax credits to offset the tax liability associated with the one-time transition tax. See note 7 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional information regarding the U.S. tax reform.
2017 Restructuring Program
During the first quarter of 2017, Historical DuPont committed to take actions to improve plant productivity and better position its product lines for productivity and growth before and after the anticipated closing of the Merger (the 2017 Restructuring Program). In connection with these actions, Historical DuPont incurred pretax charges of $313 million during the period from January 1 through August 31, 2017 recognized in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in Historical DuPonts consolidated statements of operations. The charges primarily relate to the second quarter closure of the safety and construction product line at the Cooper River manufacturing site located near Charleston, South Carolina. The actions associated with this plan were substantially complete as of December 31, 2017. Additional details related to this plan can be found in note 5 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
2016 Global Cost Savings and Restructuring Plan
On December 11, 2015, Historical DuPont announced a 2016 global cost savings and restructuring plan (the 2016 Restructuring Plan) designed to reduce $730 million in costs in 2016 compared with 2015. As part of the 2016 Restructuring Plan, Historical DuPont committed to take structural actions across all product lines and staff functions globally to operate more efficiently by further consolidating product lines and aligning staff functions more closely with them. In connection with the restructuring actions, Historical DuPont recorded a pretax charge to earnings of $783 million in the fourth quarter of 2015, comprised of $641 million of severance and related benefit costs, $109 million of asset related charges and $33 million of contract termination costs. The restructuring actions associated with the charge are substantially complete and the plan delivered the target cost reductions in 2016 versus 2015. Additional details related to this plan can be found in note 5 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
Impact of 2017 Hurricanes
In 2017, Hurricane Harvey made landfall in Texas and Hurricane Maria made landfall in Puerto Rico, both causing widespread damage. The financial impact related to the hurricanes, including lost sales and repairs and maintenance, is not material to the Predecessor or Successor financial statements.
Separation of Performance Chemicals
In October 2013, Historical DuPont announced its intention to separate its Performance Chemicals segment through a U.S. tax-free spin-off to shareholders, subject to customary closing conditions. In July 2015, Historical
DuPont completed the separation of its Performance Chemicals segment through the spin-off of all the issued and outstanding stock of The Chemours Company (Chemours).
Settlement of PFOA MDL
As previously reported, approximately 3,550 lawsuits have been filed in various federal and state courts in Ohio and West Virginia alleging personal injury from exposure to perfluorooctanoic acid and its salts, including the
99
ammonium salt (PFOA), in drinking water as a result of the historical manufacture or use of PFOA at the Washington Works plant outside Parkersburg, West Virginia. The plant operating units involved in the allegations are owned and operated by Chemours. These personal injury lawsuits were consolidated in multi-district litigation in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio (the MDL). In February 2017, Historical DuPont and plaintiffs counsel agreed to a settlement in principle of the MDL; the parties executed the definitive settlement agreements in March 2017. The total settlement amount is $670.7 million in cash, half of which was paid by Chemours and half by Historical DuPont. The settlement was entered into solely by way of compromise and is not in any way an admission of liability or fault by Historical DuPont or Chemours. Historical DuPont recorded a pre-tax charge of $335 million ($214 million net of tax) to (loss) income from discontinued operations after income taxes in the consolidated statement of operations for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 for the remainder of the settlement not subject to indemnification by Chemours. See note 14 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional information.
Net Sales
2017 versus 2016
Net sales were $7.1 billion for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 and $17.3 billion for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, compared to $23.2 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016. The $1.1 billion increase was primarily driven by four percent higher sales volume. In Asia Pacific, sales volume increased 10 percent primarily driven by the electronics and imaging product line and the transportation and advanced polymers product line. In EMEA sales volume increased five percent driven by the agriculture product line and the safety and construction product line. In the U.S. and Canada, net sales increased one percent, principally reflecting volume growth in the agriculture product line. In Latin America, net sales increased four percent, driven by a positive currency impact due to stronger Brazilian real, as well as higher volume, partially offset by lower local prices.
In the consolidated statements of operations, royalty income is included within net sales in the Successor Period and is included in sundry incomenet in the Predecessor Periods. Royalty income does not have a significant impact on any period presented. See note 1 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further discussion of the changes in presentation.
100
2016 versus 2015
Net sales of $23.2 billion in 2016 were 2 percent below prior year net sales of $23.7 billion, reflecting a one percent reduction due to currency and a one percent decrease due to lower local prices. The negative currency impact was primarily due to the weaker Euro, Mexican peso and Chinese yuan, partly offset by the stronger Japanese yen and Brazilian real. Worldwide lower local prices primarily reflect reductions for the transportation and advanced polymers product line and the electronic and imaging product line, as well as flat prices in the agriculture product line. Worldwide volume was flat.
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016 |
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2015 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in billions) | Net Sales |
% of Net
Sales |
Net Sales |
% of Net
Sales |
Net Sales |
% of Net
Sales |
Net Sales |
% of Net
Sales |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Worldwide |
$ | 7.1 | 100.0 | % | $ | 17.3 | 100.0 | % | $ | 23.2 | 100.0 | % | $ | 23.7 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
U.S. & Canada |
2.2 | 31.0 | % | 8.1 | 46.8 | % | 10.1 | 43.5 | % | 10.5 | 44.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Europe, Middle East & Africa |
1.7 | 23.9 | % | 3.9 | 22.5 | % | 5.3 | 22.8 | % | 5.5 | 23.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
2.1 | 29.6 | % | 3.9 | 22.5 | % | 5.4 | 23.3 | % | 5.3 | 22.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Latin America |
1.1 | 15.5 | % | 1.4 | 8.1 | % | 2.4 | 10.3 | % | 2.4 | 10.1 | % |
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS)
2017 versus 2016
COGS was $6.2 billion for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 and $10.2 billion for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 compared to $14.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily driven by the amortization of the inventory step-up of $1.5 billion for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 as well as higher sales volume, increased expenses due to the elimination of the other operating charges financial statement line item in the Successor period, higher depreciation related to the fair value step up of property, plant and equipment, and higher pension and OPEB costs due to the curtailment gains recognized in 2016 as a result of the changes made to the U.S. pension and OPEB benefits.
COGS as a percentage of net sales was 87 percent, 59 percent and 60 percent for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively. The amortization of the inventory step-up was 22 percent of net sales in the Successor period. The remaining COGS increase as a percentage of net sales in the Successor period is due to the items discussed above, partially offset with a pension and OPEB benefit as a result of the absence of the amortization of net losses from AOCL. The elimination of the other operating charges financial statement line item would have increased COGS as a percentage of net sales by two percent for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016.
See notes 1 and 3 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further discussion of the changes in presentation and for additional information regarding the Merger, including the valuation of inventory, respectively.
2016 versus 2015
COGS decreased from $14.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $14.0 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily driven by lower raw material costs, lower pension and OPEB
101
costs, and the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus certain global currencies. COGS as a percentage of net sales decreased two percent, from 62 percent to 60 percent, principally due to lower raw material costs and lower pension and OPEB costs.
Other Operating Charges
2017 versus 2016
Other operating charges were $667 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $504 million for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017. In the Successor period, other operating charges are included primarily in COGS, as well as selling, general and administrative expenses, and amortization of intangibles. See note 1 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further discussion of the changes in presentation.
2016 versus 2015
Other operating charges increased from $434 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $667 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily driven by a $152 million decrease in Imprelis ® herbicide insurance recoveries, and a $23 million reduction in the estimated liability related to Imprelis ® herbicide claims versus a $130 million accrual reduction in the prior year.
R&D Expense
2017 versus 2016
R&D expense was $473 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, $1,064 million for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and $1,502 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The change was primarily driven by an increase in R&D expense related to the agriculture product line and higher pension and OPEB costs due to the curtailment gains recognized in 2016 as a result of the changes made to the U.S. pension and OPEB benefits in 2016, partially offset with lower costs related to the Synergy Program.
R&D expense as a percentage of net sales was 7 percent, 6 percent and 6 percent for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively. R&D as a percentage of net sales is slightly higher in the Successor period, primarily due to an increase in R&D for new product introductions and higher depreciation, partially offset with a pension and OPEB benefit, cost savings and the absence of amortization expense.
2016 versus 2015
R&D expenses decreased from $1,735 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $1,502 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to lower costs related to the 2016 global cost savings and restructuring plan, a decrease in pension and OPEB costs and the strengthening of the U.S. dollar versus certain global currencies. R&D as a percentage of net sales decreased one percent, from seven percent to six percent, principally due to cost savings and lower pension and OPEB costs.
SG&A Expenses
2017 versus 2016
SG&A expenses were $1,101 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, $3,306 million for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and $4,143 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The change was primarily driven by higher transaction costs, increased selling expense and commissions, primarily
102
for agriculture products, higher compensation and higher pension and OPEB costs, partially offset with lower costs related to the 2016 global cost savings and restructuring plan and the absence of amortization expense in the Successor period. In the Successor period, integration and separation costs and amortization of intangibles are presented as separate line items on the consolidated statements of operations. See note 1 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further discussion of the changes in presentation. During the year ended December 31, 2016 and the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, Historical DuPont incurred $386 million and $581 million, respectively, of transaction costs in connection with the Merger and the distributions.
SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales was 16 percent, 19 percent and 16 percent for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively. Transaction costs were three percent and two percent of net sales for the period January through August 31, 2017 and for the year ended December 31, 2016. The remaining increase as a percentage of net sales in the Successor period is due to the items discussed above.
2016 versus 2015
SG&A expenses decreased from $4,428 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $4,143 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The $285 million decrease was primarily due to lower costs related to the 2016 global cost savings and restructuring plan, lower selling expense, and a decrease in pension and OPEB costs, partially offset by $386 million of transaction costs associated with the Merger. SG&A expenses as a percentage of net sales decreased by one percent, from 19 percent to 18 percent, primarily due to cost savings from Historical DuPonts 2016 global cost savings and restructuring plan and a decrease in pension and OPEB costs.
Amortization of Intangibles
Intangible asset amortization was $389 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017. In the Predecessor periods, amortization of intangibles was included within SG&A, other operating charges, R&D and COGS. See note 3 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further information regarding the Merger, including the valuation of intangible assets.
Restructuring and Asset-Related ChargesNet
2017 versus 2016
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet were $180 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, $323 million for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and $556 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The charge for period January 1 through August 31, 2017 comprises $279 million of asset-related charges and $44 million in severance and related benefit costs. The asset-related charges primarily relate to the second quarter closure of the safety and construction product line at the Cooper River manufacturing site located near Charleston, South Carolina as part of the 2017 Restructuring Program. For the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, Historical DuPont recorded a pretax charge of $187 million, consisting of severance and related benefit costs of $153 million, contract termination costs of $31 million, and asset-related charges of $3 million related to the Synergy Program described above. This charge was partially offset by a $7 million benefit related to the 2016 and 2014 restructuring plans for adjustments to recognized severance costs. See note 5 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional information.
The $556 million charge for 2016 consisted of $593 million of asset-related charges (discussed below in the Asset Impairments section) and a $68 million charge related to the decision to not restart Historical DuPonts
103
insecticide manufacturing facility at the La Porte site located in La Porte, Texas. These charges were partially offset by a net $84 million benefit related to the 2016 Restructuring Plan, primarily due to a reduction in severance and related benefit costs driven by the elimination of positions at a lower cost than expected, and a $21 million benefit related to the 2014 restructuring plan for adjustments to the previously recognized severance costs.
2016 versus 2015
Restructuring and asset-related chargesnet decreased from $795 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $556 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The charges for 2016 are discussed above. The $795 million in charges recorded during 2015 in restructuring and asset related chargesnet consist of a pretax charge of $783 million related to the 2016 Restructuring Plan, consisting of $778 million of restructuring and asset related chargesnet and $5 million in sundry incomenet. The charges consisted of $641 million in severance and related benefit costs, $109 million in asset-related charges and $33 million in contract termination charges. In addition, Historical DuPont recognized a $38 million impairment charge discussed below, partly offset by a $21 million net benefit related to the 2014 restructuring plan. The $21 million net benefit was recorded to adjust the estimated costs associated with the 2014 restructuring program due to lower than estimated individual severance costs and workforce reductions achieved through nonseverance programs, offset by the identification of additional projects.
Asset Impairments
During 2016, Historical DuPont recorded an asset impairment charge of $435 million related to its uncompleted enterprise resource planning system. Given the uncertainties related to timing of completion, as well as potential developments and changes to technologies in the market place at the time of restart, use of the system could no longer be considered probable. See note 5 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional details related to this charge.
During 2016, Historical DuPont recorded a $158 million impairment charge related to indefinite-lived intangible trade names as a result of the realignment of brand marketing strategies and a determination to phase out the use of certain acquired trade names.
During 2015, Historical DuPont recorded an impairment charge of $38 million related to an impairment of a cost-basis investment.
Integration and Separation Costs
Integration and separation costs were $314 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017. In the Predecessor periods, integration and separation costs were included within SG&A. See note 1 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further discussion of the changes in presentation.
Sundry IncomeNet
2017 versus 2016
Sundry incomenet was $166 million and $90 million for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 and for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, respectively. Sundry incomenet was $707 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The period September 1 through December 31, 2017, the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016 includes a net exchange gain of $8 million, a net exchange loss of $394 million and a net exchange loss of $106 million, respectively. The period January 1
104
through August 31, 2017 included a pretax gain of $162 million associated with the sale of the global food safety diagnostic business. The year ended December 31, 2016 included a pretax gain of $369 million associated with the sale of DuPont (Shenzhen) Manufacturing Limited entity.
2016 versus 2015
Sundry incomenet increased from $690 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $707 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The $17 million increase was primarily due to gains on sales of businesses and other assets, including a $369 million gain on the sale of DuPont (Shenzhen) Manufacturing Limited, partially offset by an increase in pretax exchange losses and the absence of a $145 million gain associated with Historical DuPonts settlement of a legal claim in the prior year. Pretax exchange losses increased $136 million compared to prior year.
See notes 6 and 18 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further discussion of Historical DuPonts policy of hedging the foreign-currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities.
Interest Expense
2017 versus 2016
Interest expense was $107 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, $254 million for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and $370 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The change was primarily driven by the amortization of the step-up of debt as a result of pushdown accounting, partially offset by higher debt balances.
2016 versus 2015
Interest expense increased from $342 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $370 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to lower capitalized interest related to construction projects partially offset by lower interest on borrowings.
Provision for Income Taxes on Continuing Operations
2017 versus 2016
For the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, Historical DuPonts effective tax rate of 168.5 percent on the pretax loss from continuing operations of $1,586 million was favorably impacted by a provisional net benefit of $2,001 million that Historical DuPont recognized due to the enactment of the TCJA, a net benefit of $261 million related to an internal legal entity restructuring associated with the distributions, as well as the geographic mix of earnings. Those impacts were partially offset by the nontax deductible amortization of the fair value step-up in inventories as a result of the Merger, certain net exchange losses recognized on the remeasurement of the net monetary asset positions, which were not tax deductible in their local jurisdictions, as well as the tax impact of costs associated with the Merger and restructuring and asset-related charges.
For the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, Historical DuPonts effective tax rate was 8.3 percent on pretax income from continuing operations of $1,791 million. For the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, Historical DuPonts effective tax rate was favorably impacted by the geographic mix of earnings, certain net exchange gains recognized on the remeasurement of the net monetary asset positions, which were not taxable in their local jurisdictions, net favorable tax consequences of the adoption of FASB ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, tax benefits related to a reduction in Historical DuPonts unrecognized tax benefits due to the closure of various tax statutes of limitations, as well as tax benefits on costs associated with the Merger and restructuring and asset-
105
related charges. Those tax benefits were partially offset by the unfavorable tax consequences of nondeductible goodwill associated with the gain on the sale of global food safety diagnostics in the first quarter of 2017.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, Historical DuPonts effective tax rate of 23.5 percent on pretax income from continuing operations of $2,723 million was impacted by the geographic mix of earnings as well as certain net exchange gains recognized on the remeasurement of the net monetary asset positions, which were not taxable in their local jurisdictions. Those benefits were partially offset by the tax consequences of the gain on the sale of DuPont (Shenzhen) Manufacturing Limited in the first quarter of 2016.
2016 versus 2015
For the year ended December 31, 2015, Historical DuPonts effective tax rate of 28.4 percent on pretax income from continuing operations of $2,022 million was impacted by Historical DuPonts policy of hedging the foreign-currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations, as well as increased tax benefits on restructuring and asset-related charges.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements of Historical DuPont
See note 2 to the annual and interim consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibits 99.2 and 99.3, respectively, to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources of Historical DuPont
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
June 30,
2018 |
December 31,
2017 |
December 31,
2016 |
|||||||||
Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities |
$ | 4,795 | $ | 8,202 | $ | 5,910 | ||||||
Total debt |
13,429 | 13,070 | 8,536 |
Historical DuPont continually reviews it sources of liquidity and debt portfolio and occasionally may make adjustments to one or both to ensure adequate liquidity and an optimum debt maturity schedule.
Historical DuPonts credit ratings impact its access to the debt capital markets and cost of capital. Historical DuPont remains committed to a strong financial position and strong investment-grade rating. Historical DuPonts long-term and short-term credit ratings are as follows:
Long-term | Short-term | Outlook | ||||
Standard & Poors |
A- | A-2 | Stable | |||
Moodys Investors Service |
A3 | P-2 | Negative | |||
Fitch Ratings |
A | F1 | Rating Watch Negative |
Historical DuPont believes its ability to generate cash from operations and access to capital markets will be adequate to meet anticipated cash requirements to fund its working capital, capital spending, debt maturities as well as distributions and other intercompany transfers to DowDuPont which relies on distributions from Historical DuPont and Historical Dow to fund payment of its costs and expenses. Historical DuPonts liquidity needs can be met through a variety of sources, including cash provided by operating activities, cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, commercial paper, syndicated credit lines, bilateral credit lines, long-term debt markets, bank financing, committed receivable repurchase facilities and asset sales.
106
Historical DuPont has access to approximately $6.8 billion and $6.7 billion in committed and uncommitted unused credit lines with several major financial institutions at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, including unused commitments of $3 billion under the Term Loan Facility described below and a $3 billion revolving credit facility to support its commercial paper program. These unused credit lines provide support to meet Historical DuPonts short-term liquidity needs and for general corporate purposes which may include funding of discretionary and non-discretionary contributions to certain benefit plans, severance payments, repayment and refinancing of debt, working capital, capital expenditures and repurchases and redemptions of securities.
In May 2017, Historical DuPont completed an underwritten public offering of $1.25 billion of Historical DuPonts 2.20 percent Notes due 2020 and $750 million of Historical DuPonts Floating Rate Notes due 2020 (the May 2017 Debt Offering). The proceeds of this offering were used to make a discretionary pension contribution to Historical DuPonts principal U.S. pension plan, as discussed below.
Historical DuPonts indenture covenants include customary limitations on liens, sale and leaseback transactions, and mergers and consolidations affecting manufacturing plants, mineral producing properties, or research facilities located in the United States and the consolidated subsidiaries owning such plants, properties, and facilities subject to certain limitations. The outstanding long-term debt also contains customary default provisions. In addition, Historical DuPont will be required to redeem all of the notes associated with the May 2017 Debt Offering at a redemption price equal to 100 percent of the aggregate principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest upon the announcement of the record date for the separation of either the agriculture or specialty products business, or the entry into an agreement to sell all or substantially all of the assets of either business to a third party.
To support short-term liquidity needs, Historical DuPont has a $3 billion revolving credit facility to support its commercial paper program and a credit agreement that provides for a three-year, senior unsecured term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $4.5 billion (as may be amended, from time to time, the Term Loan Facility). Under the Term Loan Facility, Historical DuPont may make up to seven term loan borrowings and amounts repaid or prepaid are not available for subsequent borrowings. The commitment to lend under the Term Loan Facility ends on June 30, 2019. The proceeds from the borrowings under the Term Loan Facility will be used for general corporate purposes, including debt repayment, working capital, and funding a portion of DowDuPonts costs and expenses. The maturity date under the Term Loan Facility and the revolving credit facility, as amended, is June 1, 2020, at which time all outstanding borrowings, including accrued but unpaid interest, become immediately due and payable. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, Historical DuPont had made three term loan borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of $1.5 billion and had unused commitments of $3 billion under the Term Loan Facility.
The Term Loan Facility and the revolving credit facility contain customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants, and events of default that are typical for companies with similar credit ratings and generally consistent with those applicable to Historical DuPonts long-term public debt. The Term Loan Facility and the revolving credit facility contain a financial covenant requiring that the ratio of total indebtedness to total capitalization not exceed 0.6667. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, Historical DuPont was in compliance with this financial covenant.
The Term Loan Facility and the revolving credit facility impose additional affirmative and negative covenants after the closing of the Merger, subject to certain limitations, including to:
|
not sell, lease, or otherwise convey to DowDuPont, its shareholders or its non-Historical DuPont subsidiaries, any assets or properties of Historical DuPont or its subsidiaries unless the aggregate amount of revenue attributable to all such assets and properties so conveyed after the merger does not exceed 30 percent of the consolidated revenue of Historical DuPont and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015 (the Disposition Limitation); and |
107
|
not guarantee any indebtedness or other obligations of DowDuPont, Historical Dow, or their respective subsidiaries (other than of Historical DuPont and its subsidiaries). |
The Term Loan Facility and the amended revolving credit facility will terminate, and the loans and other amounts thereunder would become due and payable, upon the sale, transfer, lease, or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the agriculture product line to DowDuPont, its shareholders, or any of its non-Historical DuPont subsidiaries.
In January 2017, Historical DuPont entered into a committed receivable repurchase facility of up to $1.3 billion (the 2017 Repurchase Facility), which expired on November 30, 2017. Under the facility, Historical DuPont sold a portfolio of available and eligible outstanding customer notes receivables within the agriculture product line to participating institutions and simultaneously agreed to repurchase at a future date.
In February 2018, Historical DuPont entered into a new committed receivable repurchase facility of up to $1.3 billion (the 2018 Repurchase Facility), which expires on December 15, 2018. The 2018 Repurchase Facility has substantially similar terms and conditions as the 2017 Repurchase Facility and includes the 2017 Repurchase Facility change of control language conformed to the Disposition Limitation covenant described above. See further discussion of the 2018 Repurchase Facility in note 22 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
At the end of 2016, Historical DuPont anticipated making contributions of approximately $230 million to its principal U.S. pension plan in 2017. During the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, Historical DuPont made total contributions of $2.9 billion to its principal U.S. pension plan, an increase of approximately $2.7 billion reflecting discretionary contributions. The discretionary contribution was funded through the May 2017 Debt Offering, as discussed above, short-term borrowings, including commercial paper issuance and cash. The $2.9 billion contribution was taken as a deduction on Historical DuPonts 2016 federal tax return and resulted in a net operating loss for tax purposes. This loss resulted in an overpayment of taxes paid of approximately $800 million. A portion of the overpayment was applied against the current year tax liability. The remainder of the loss generated a refund of approximately $700 million, which was received during the fourth quarter of 2017.
As of June 30, 2018, Historical DuPont was evaluating making a discretionary contribution in the third quarter of 2018 to its principal U.S. pension plan. Any such contribution could be funded by existing cash balances and/or cash from other available sources of liquidity. The determination to make such a contribution as well as the amount of any such contribution, depends on a number of factors including tax-deductible limits and capital structure considerations. Historical DuPont expects the amount of any contribution made to this plan in 2018 to be less than half of the contributions made to this plan in 2017. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsRecent Developments for further information relating to the above noted discretionary contribution.
Historical DuPont entered into a trust agreement in 2013 (as amended and restated in 2017, the Trust Agreement) that established and requires Historical DuPont to fund a trust (the Trust) for cash obligations under certain nonqualified benefit and deferred compensation plans upon a change in control event as defined in the Trust Agreement. Under the Trust Agreement, the consummation of the Merger was a change in control event. As a result, in November 2017, Historical DuPont contributed $571 million to the Trust. In the fourth quarter of 2017, $13 million was distributed to Historical DuPont according to the Trust Agreement and at December 31, 2017, the balance in the Trust was $558 million.
Historical DuPonts cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities at June 30, 2018, December 31, 2017 and 2016 were $4.8 billion, $8.2 billion and $5.9 billion, respectively, of which $4.2 billion at June 30, 2018, $7.9 billion at December 31, 2017 and $5.7 billion at December 31, 2016 was held by subsidiaries in foreign
108
countries, including United States territories. For each of its foreign subsidiaries, Historical DuPont makes an assertion regarding the amount of earnings intended for permanent reinvestment, with the balance available to be repatriated to the United States.
The TCJA requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of foreign subsidiaries, a majority of which were previously considered permanently reinvested by Historical DuPont (see note 7 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further details of the TCJA). The cash held by foreign subsidiaries for permanent reinvestment is generally used to finance the subsidiaries operational activities and future foreign investments. A deferred tax liability has been accrued for the estimated U.S. federal tax on all unrepatriated earnings as of December 31, 2017, in accordance with the TCJA. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, management believed that sufficient liquidity is available in the United States. Historical DuPont is currently evaluating the impact of the TCJA on its permanent reinvestment assertion. In the event that additional foreign funds are needed in the United States, Historical DuPont has the ability to repatriate additional funds. The repatriation could result in an adjustment to the tax liability for foreign withholding taxes, foreign and/or U.S. state income taxes, and the impact of foreign currency movements. As such, it is not practicable to calculate the unrecognized deferred tax liability on undistributed foreign earnings. During 2018, Historical DuPont has and expects to continue repatriating certain funds from its foreign subsidiaries that are not needed to finance local operations or separation activities; however, these particular repatriation activities have not and are not expected to result in a significant incremental tax liability to the consolidated financial statements of Historical DuPont.
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
For the Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
For the Six
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash (used for) provided by operating activities |
$ | (1,591 | ) | $ | (4,055 | ) | $ | 4,196 | $ | (3,949 | ) | $ | 3,357 | $ | 2,422 |
Cash used for operating activities was $1.6 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $4.1 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The decrease was due to higher pension contributions in 2017, partially offset by higher tax payments and higher integration and separation costs in 2018.
Cash provided by operating activities was $4.2 billion for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, primarily driven by seasonal cash flows related to the agriculture product line and a tax refund related to voluntary pension contributions made in the Predecessor period, partially offset by transaction costs and the perfluorooctanoic acid multidistrict litigation settlement, which was primarily paid in September. Cash used for operating activities was $3.9 billion for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, primarily driven by pension contributions of $3.0 billion, seasonal cash flows related to the agriculture product line, transaction costs and tax payments, partially offset by earnings. Cash provided by operating activities was $3.4 billion for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to earnings offset by tax payments, pension contributions and transaction costs.
109
Cash provided by operating activities increased $1.0 billion in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to a higher earnings contribution of approximately $0.5 billion, lower year-over-year income tax payments and lower working capital.
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
For the Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
For the Six
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
$ | 34 | $ | (1,932 | ) | $ | 2,210 | $ | (2,382 | ) | $ | (1,514 | ) | $ | (1,828 | ) |
Cash provided by investing activities was $34 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to $1.9 billion used by investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The change was due primarily to decreased purchases of marketable securities partially offset by lower proceeds from sales of businesses and other assets.
Cash provided by investing activities was $2.2 billion for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, primarily driven by $1.2 billion of cash received for the FMC Transactions and net proceeds from investments, partially offset by the funding of the Trust and capital expenditures. Cash used for investing activities was $2.4 billion for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, primarily due to increased net purchases of investments, capital expenditures, payments for the acquisition of Granular Inc. and net payments from foreign currency contracts, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of property and businesses. Cash used for investing activities of $1.5 billion during the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to $1.0 billion of capital expenditures, net purchases of investments, and net payments from foreign currency contracts, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of property and businesses.
Cash used for investing activities in 2016 increased by $0.3 billion compared to 2015. The change was primarily due to lower purchases of property, plant and equipment, lower net purchases of marketable securities, and higher proceeds from sales of product lines and other assets. This is partially offset by cash outflows relating to foreign currency contract settlements. See note 18 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further discussion of marketable securities outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Capital expenditures totaled $0.6 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2018, $0.5 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2017, $0.7 billion and $0.4 billion for the periods from January 1 through August 31, 2017 and September 1 through December 31, 2017, respectively, $1.0 billion in 2016 and $1.6 billion in 2015.
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
For the Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
For the Six
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash (used for) provided by investing activities |
$ | (1,211 | ) | $ | 4,531 | $ | (3,227 | ) | $ | 5,632 | $ | (2,385 | ) | $ | (1,929 | ) |
Cash used for financing activities was $1.2 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2018 compared to $4.5 billion provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The change was due primarily to higher borrowings in 2017 related to pension contributions and increased distributions to DowDuPont to support share repurchases.
Cash used for financing activities was $3.2 billion for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, driven by a decrease in borrowings from commercial paper, distributions to DowDuPont and dividends paid to
110
stockholders, partially offset by increased borrowings under the Term Loan. Cash provided by financing activities was $5.6 billion for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, driven by the May 2017 Debt Offering as well as increased borrowings from commercial paper, the 2017 Repurchase Facility and the Term Loan Facility, partially offset by dividends paid to stockholders. Cash used for financing activities of $2.4 billion during the year ended December 31, 2016 was driven by dividend payments to stockholders, repurchases of common stock and repayments of long-term debt.
The $0.5 billion increase in cash used for financing activities in 2016 compared to 2015 was primarily due to lower borrowings as a result of the prior year distribution of approximately $3.9 billion, which Chemours financed through external borrowings and paid to Historical DuPont prior to its separation. This was partially offset by lower share repurchases and lower dividends paid to stockholders.
Dividend payments to shareholders of Historical DuPont common and preferred stock totaled $0.3 billion during the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, which includes the third quarter dividend declared for common stockholders of record July 31, 2017 and paid in September 2017. Dividend payments to shareholders of Historical DuPont common and preferred stock totaled $0.7 billion during the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, $1.3 billion in 2016 and $1.5 billion in 2015. Dividends per share of common stock were $1.14 for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, $1.52 in 2016 and $1.72 in 2015.
In the first quarter of 2015, Historical DuPont announced its intention to buy back about $4 billion of shares of Historical DuPont common stock using the distribution proceeds received from Chemours. During 2015, Historical DuPont purchased and retired 35 million shares of Historical DuPont common stock through a $2 billion accelerated share repurchase agreement and in 2016 purchased and retired 13.2 million shares in the open market at a cost of $916 million.
As of the consummation of the Merger, shares of Historical DuPont common stock held publicly were redeemed and Historical DuPonts common stock is owned solely by its parent company, DowDuPont. EID Preferred Stock remains issued and outstanding, and Historical DuPont continues to be responsible for dividends on the EID Preferred Stock; however, the obligation is not material to Historical DuPonts liquidity. Dividend payments to shareholders of EID Preferred Stock totaled $5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018, $3 million during the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, $7 million during the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, $10 million in 2016 and $10 million in 2015.
DowDuPont relies on distributions and other intercompany transfers from Historical DuPont and Historical Dow to fund payment of its costs and expenses. In November 2017, the DowDuPont board of directors declared a fourth quarter dividend per share of DowDuPont common stock payable on December 15, 2017 and authorized an initial $4 billion share repurchase program to buy back shares of DowDuPont common stock. In the fourth quarter of 2017, Historical DuPont declared and paid distributions in cash and in-kind to DowDuPont of $829 million, primarily to fund a portion of DowDuPonts fourth quarter share repurchases and dividend payment. In February and April of 2018, the board of directors of DowDuPont declared first and second quarter dividends of $0.38 per share of DowDuPont common stock payable. In the six months ended June 30, 2018, Historical DuPont declared and paid distributions to DowDuPont of about $1.7 billion, primarily to fund a portion of DowDuPonts first and second quarter share repurchases and dividend payments.
On June 25, 2018, DowDuPont declared a dividend of $0.38 per share, payable on September 14, 2018, to its shareholders of record on August 31, 2018. Historical DuPonts amount of this shareholder dividend has not yet been determined. On October 11, 2018, DowDuPont declared a dividend of $0.38 per share, payable on December 14, 2018, to its shareholders of record on November 30, 2018. Historical DuPonts amount of this shareholder dividend has not yet been determined.
See note 15 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional information relating to the above share buyback plans.
111
Critical Accounting Estimates of Historical DuPont
Historical DuPonts significant accounting policies are more fully described in note 1 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part. Management believes that the application of these policies on a consistent basis enables Historical DuPont to provide the users of the financial statements with useful and reliable information about Historical DuPonts operating results and financial condition.
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts, including, but not limited to, receivable and inventory valuations, impairment of tangible and intangible assets, long-term employee benefit obligations, income taxes, restructuring liabilities, environmental matters and litigation. Managements estimates are based on historical experience, facts, and circumstances available at the time and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable. Historical DuPont reviews these matters and reflects changes in estimates as appropriate. Management believes that the following represents some of the more critical judgment areas in the application of Historical DuPonts accounting policies, which could have a material effect on Historical DuPonts financial position, liquidity, or results of operations.
Pension Plans and Other Postemployment Benefits
Accounting for employee benefit plans involves numerous assumptions and estimates. Discount rate and expected return on plan assets are two critical assumptions in measuring the cost and benefit obligation of Historical DuPonts pension and OPEB plans. Management reviews these two key assumptions when plans are remeasured. These and other assumptions are updated periodically to reflect the actual experience and expectations on a plan-specific basis as appropriate. As permitted by U.S. GAAP, actual results that differ from the assumptions are accumulated on a plan-by-plan basis and to the extent that such differences exceed 10 percent of the greater of the plans benefit obligation or the applicable plan assets, the excess is amortized over the average remaining service period of active employees.
About 80 percent of Historical DuPonts benefit obligation for pensions and essentially all Historical DuPonts OPEB obligations are attributable to the benefit plans in the United States. In the United States, the discount rate is developed by matching the expected cash flow of the benefit plans to a yield curve constructed from a portfolio of high quality fixed-income instruments provided by the plans actuaries as of the measurement date. Effective in 2016, Historical DuPont began to measure the service and interest cost components utilizing a full yield curve approach by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. Historical DuPont made this change as it believes it is a more precise measurement of service and interest costs by improving the correlation between projected benefit cash flows to the corresponding spot yield curve rates. Historical DuPont considers this a change in estimate, and, accordingly, has accounted for it on a prospective basis. This change does not affect the measure of the total benefit obligation. Historically, the service and interest cost components were estimated utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve and cash flow for measurement of the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. For non-U.S. benefit plans, Historical DuPont utilizes prevailing long-term high quality corporate bond indices to determine the discount rate, applicable to each country, at the measurement date.
Within the United States, Historical DuPont establishes strategic asset allocation percentage targets and appropriate benchmarks for significant asset classes with the aim of achieving a prudent balance between return and risk. Strategic asset allocations in other countries are selected in accordance with the laws and practices of those countries. Where appropriate, asset-liability studies are also taken into consideration. The long-term expected return on plan assets in the United States is based upon historical real returns (net of inflation) for the asset classes covered by the investment policy, expected performance, and projections of inflation and interest rates over the long-term period during which benefits are payable to plan participants. Consistent with prior
112
years, the long-term expected return on plan assets in the United States reflects the asset allocation of the plan and the effect of Historical DuPonts active management of the plans assets. In connection with pension contributions of $2,900 million to its principal U.S. pension plan for the period of January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017, an investment policy study was completed for the principal U.S. pension plan. The study resulted in new target asset allocations for the U.S. pension plan with resulting changes to the expected return on plan assets. The long-term rate of return on assets decreased from 8.00 percent for the Predecessor period to 6.25 percent for the Successor period in 2017.
In determining the annual expense for the principal U.S. pension plan, Historical DuPont uses a market-related value of assets rather than its fair value. The market-related value of assets is calculated by averaging market returns over 36 months. Accordingly, there may be a lag in recognition of changes in the market valuation. As a result, changes in the fair value of assets are not immediately reflected in Historical DuPonts calculation of net periodic pension cost. The following table shows the market-related value and fair value of plan assets for the principal U.S. pension plan:
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||
(Dollars in billions) |
December 31,
2017 |
December 31,
2016 |
December 31,
2015 |
|||||||||
Market-related value of assets |
$ | 16.6 | $ | 13.5 | $ | 15.1 | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets |
16.7 | 13.5 | 14.4 |
For plans other than the principal U.S. pension plan, pension expense is determined using the fair value of plan assets.
The following table highlights the potential impact on Historical DuPonts pretax earnings due to changes in certain key assumptions with respect to Historical DuPonts pension and OPEB plans, based on assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017:
(Dollars in millions) |
1/4 Percentage
Point Increase |
1/4 Percentage
Point Decrease |
||||||
Discount rate |
$ | (34 | ) | $ | 37 | |||
Expected rate of return on plan assets |
49 | (49 | ) |
Additional information with respect to pension and OPEB expenses, liabilities, and assumptions is discussed under Long-term Employee Benefits and in note 16 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
Environmental Matters
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, Historical DuPont had accrued obligations of $426 million and $433 million, respectively, for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs, including $60 million and $67 million, respectively, for the remediation of sites under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (Superfund). As remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site, it is difficult to develop precise estimates of future site remediation costs. Historical DuPonts estimates are based on a number of factors, including the complexity of the geology, the nature and extent of contamination, the type of remedy, the outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other PRPs at multi-party sites, and the number of and financial viability of other PRPs. Therefore, considerable uncertainty exists with respect to environmental remediation and costs, and, under adverse changes in circumstances, it is reasonably possible that the ultimate cost with respect to these particular matters could range up to $860 million above the amount accrued as of June 30, 2018 (and $900 million as of December 31, 2017). Consequently, it is reasonably possible that environmental remediation
113
and restoration costs in excess of amounts accrued could have a material impact on Historical DuPonts results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. It is the opinion of Historical DuPonts management, however, that the possibility is remote that costs in excess of the range disclosed will have a material impact on Historical DuPonts results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. For further discussion, see notes 1 and 14 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
Legal Contingencies
Historical DuPonts results of operations could be affected by significant litigation adverse to Historical DuPont, including product liability claims, patent infringement and antitrust claims, and claims for third-party property damage or personal injury stemming from alleged environmental torts. Historical DuPont records accruals for legal matters when the information available indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Management makes adjustments to these accruals to reflect the impact and status of negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of counsel, and other information and events that may pertain to a particular matter. Predicting the outcome of claims and lawsuits and estimating related costs and exposure involves substantial uncertainties that could cause actual costs to vary materially from estimates. In making determinations of likely outcomes of litigation matters, management considers many factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, the nature of specific claims including unasserted claims, Historical DuPonts experience with similar types of claims, the jurisdiction in which the matter is filed, input from outside legal counsel, the likelihood of resolving the matter through alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and the matters current status. Considerable judgment is required in determining whether to establish a litigation accrual when an adverse judgment is rendered against Historical DuPont in a court proceeding. In such situations, Historical DuPont will not recognize a loss if, based upon a thorough review of all relevant facts and information, management believes that it is probable that the pending judgment will be successfully overturned on appeal. A detailed discussion of significant litigation matters is contained in note 14 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
Indemnification Assets
On July 1, 2015, Historical DuPont completed the separation of its Performance Chemicals segment through the spin-off of all the issued and outstanding stock of Chemours (the 2015 Separation). In connection with the 2015 Separation, Historical DuPont and Chemours entered into the Separation Agreement (the 2015 Separation Agreement). Pursuant to the 2015 Separation Agreement and the Amendment to the 2015 Separation Agreement discussed in note 4 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, Historical DuPont is indemnified by Chemours against certain litigation, environmental, workers compensation, and other liabilities that arose prior to the separation. The term of this indemnification is indefinite and includes defense costs and expenses, as well as monetary and nonmonetary settlements and judgments. In connection with the recognition of liabilities related to these indemnified matters, Historical DuPont records an indemnification asset when recovery is deemed probable. In assessing the probability of recovery, Historical DuPont considers the contractual rights under the 2015 Separation Agreement and the Amendment to the 2015 Separation Agreement and any potential credit risk. Future events, such as potential disputes related to recovery as well as the solvency of Chemours, could cause the indemnification assets to have a lower value than anticipated and recorded. Historical DuPont evaluates the recovery of the indemnification assets recorded when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying values may not be fully recoverable.
Income Taxes
The breadth of Historical DuPonts operations and the global complexity of tax regulations require assessments of uncertainties and judgments in estimating taxes Historical DuPont will ultimately pay. The final taxes paid are
114
dependent upon many factors, including negotiations with taxing authorities in various jurisdictions, outcomes of tax litigation, and resolution of disputes arising from federal, state and international tax audits in the normal course of business. The resolution of these uncertainties may result in adjustments to Historical DuPonts tax assets and tax liabilities. It is reasonably possible that changes to Historical DuPonts global unrecognized tax benefits could be significant; however, due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of completion of audits and possible outcomes, a current estimate of the range of increases or decreases that may occur within the next twelve months cannot be made.
Deferred income taxes result from differences between the financial and tax basis of Historical DuPonts assets and liabilities and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the need for and magnitude of appropriate valuation allowances against deferred tax assets. The realization of these assets is dependent on generating future taxable income, as well as successful implementation of various tax planning strategies. For example, changes in facts and circumstances that alter the probability that Historical DuPont will realize deferred tax assets could result in recording a valuation allowance, thereby reducing the deferred tax asset and generating a deferred tax expense in the relevant period. In some situations, these changes could be material.
On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was enacted, making significant changes to the U.S. tax law (see note 7 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for further information). The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the TCJA for which the accounting under Accounting Standards Codification 740 (ASC 740) is incomplete. To the extent that a companys accounting for certain income tax effects of the TCJA is incomplete but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. The provisional amounts, and adjustments identified in the measurement period, are recorded to the provision for income taxes on continuing operations in the period the amounts are determined. In accordance with SAB 118, during the measurement period, income tax effects of the TCJA may be refined upon obtaining, preparing or analyzing additional information, and such changes could be material. During the measurement period, provisional amounts may be also be adjusted for the effects, if any, of interpretative guidance issued after December 31, 2017, by U.S. regulatory and standard-setting bodies. SAB 118 provides that the measurement period is complete when a companys accounting is complete and in no circumstances, should the measurement period extend beyond one year from the enactment date. If a company cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately before enactment of the TCJA. Refer to note 7 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional details related to the TCJA.
At December 31, 2017, Historical DuPont had a net deferred tax liability balance of $5.4 billion, net of valuation allowance of $1.4 billion. Realization of deferred tax assets is expected to occur over an extended period of time. As a result, changes in tax laws, assumptions with respect to future taxable income, and tax planning strategies could result in adjustments to deferred tax assets. See note 7 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional details related to the deferred tax liability balance.
Valuation of Assets and Impairment Considerations
The assets and liabilities of acquired businesses are measured at their estimated fair values at the dates of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the net assets acquired, including identified intangibles, is recorded as goodwill. The determination and allocation of fair value to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed is based on various assumptions and valuation methodologies requiring considerable management judgment, including estimates based on historical information, current market data and
115
future expectations. The principal assumptions utilized in Historical DuPonts valuation methodologies include revenue growth rates, operating margin estimates, royalty rates and discount rates. Although the estimates are deemed reasonable by management based on information available at the dates of acquisition, those estimates are inherently uncertain.
Assessment of the potential impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets, property, plant and equipment, investments in nonconsolidated affiliates, and other assets is an integral part of Historical DuPonts normal ongoing review of operations. Testing for potential impairment of these assets is significantly dependent on numerous assumptions and reflects managements best estimates at a particular point in time. The dynamic economic environments in which Historical DuPonts diversified product lines operate, and key economic and product line assumptions with respect to projected selling prices, market growth and inflation rates, can significantly affect the outcome of impairment tests. Estimates based on these assumptions may differ significantly from actual results. Changes in factors and assumptions used in assessing potential impairments can have a significant impact on the existence and magnitude of impairments, as well as the time in which such impairments are recognized. In addition, Historical DuPont continually reviews its diverse portfolio of assets to ensure they are achieving their greatest potential and are aligned with Historical DuPonts growth strategy. Strategic decisions involving a particular group of assets may trigger an assessment of the recoverability of the related assets. Such an assessment could result in impairment losses.
Historical DuPont performs goodwill impairment testing at the reporting unit level, which is defined as the operating segment or one level below the operating segment. One level below the operating segment, or component, is a business in which discrete financial information is available and regularly reviewed by management. Historical DuPont aggregates certain components into reporting units based on economic similarities. Subsequent to the Merger, Historical DuPont identified nine reporting units.
For purposes of the annual goodwill impairment test, Historical DuPont has the option to first perform qualitative testing to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. Qualitative factors assessed at the Historical DuPont level include, but are not limited to, GDP growth rates, long-term commodity prices, equity and credit market activity, discount rates, foreign exchange rates and overall financial performance. Qualitative factors assessed at the reporting unit level include, but are not limited to, changes in industry and market structure, competitive environments, planned capacity and new product launches, cost factors such as raw material prices, and financial performance of the reporting unit. If Historical DuPont chooses not to complete a qualitative assessment for a given reporting unit or if the initial assessment indicates that it is more likely than not that the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, additional quantitative testing is required.
In the Predecessor period, Historical DuPont completed the annual impairment test on July 1, 2017 when a quantitative assessment was performed on all reporting units that carry goodwill. Based on the results of Historical DuPonts annual goodwill impairment test in the Predecessor period, Historical DuPont determined that the fair value of each of the reporting units exceeded its carrying value, and therefore there were no indications of impairment. Historical DuPonts methodology for estimating the fair value of its reporting units is using the income approach based on the present value of future cash flows.
In connection with the Merger, Historical DuPont adopted the policy of DowDuPont and performed its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2017, a qualitative assessment was performed on all reporting units that carry goodwill. For the qualitative assessments, management considered the factors discussed above at both the Historical DuPont level and the reporting unit level. Based on the qualitative assessment, management concluded it is not more likely than not that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit. As discussed below, Historical DuPonts assets and liabilities were measured at fair value as of the date of the Merger, and as a result, any declines in projected cash flows could have a material, negative impact on the carrying value of Historical DuPonts assets and therefore result in an impairment.
116
Purchase Accounting
Due to the Merger and the related accounting determination, Historical DuPont has elected to apply the acquisition method of accounting, which requires that all assets and liabilities be remeasured to fair value as of the date of the Merger. Such fair values have been reflected in Historical DuPonts financial statements following the pushdown method of accounting. Estimates of fair value require a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties. The estimates and assumptions used to determine the preliminary estimated fair value assigned to each class of assets and liabilities, as well as asset lives, have a material impact to Historical DuPonts consolidated financial statements, and are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable but that are inherently uncertain. Third-party valuation specialists were engaged to assist in the valuation of certain of these assets and liabilities.
Historical DuPont believes at this time all of the reporting units with goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are at risk to have impairment charges in future periods as the carrying value and fair value of these reporting units and assets were equal at the date of the Merger resulting in little, if any, margin of fair value in excess of carrying value. The dynamic economic environments in which Historical DuPonts diversified product lines operate, and key economic and product line assumptions with respect to projected selling prices, market growth and inflation rates, can significantly affect the outcome of impairment tests. Estimates based on these assumptions may differ significantly from actual results. Changes in factors, circumstances and assumptions used in assessing potential impairments can have a significant impact on the existence and magnitude of impairments, as well as the time in which such impairments are recognized.
Historical DuPonts goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles by reporting unit at June 30, 2018 is shown below (in millions):
Reporting Unit | Goodwill |
Indefinite-Lived
Intangible Assets |
||||||
Agriculture |
$ | 13,267 | $ | 8,749 | ||||
Electronics and Communications |
4,037 | 495 | ||||||
Protection Solutions |
5,473 | 260 | ||||||
Nutrition and Health |
8,833 | 1,437 | ||||||
Transportation and Advanced Polymers |
6,360 | 310 | ||||||
Packaging and Specialty Plastics |
3,597 | 0 | ||||||
Industrial Biosciences |
3,394 | 403 | ||||||
Clean Tech |
549 | 0 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 45,510 | $ | 11,654 |
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually during the fourth quarter or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value is below its carrying value. During the third quarter of 2018, strategic business reviews will commence with the focus on alignment of the businesses to DowDuPonts overall growth strategy which includes a focus on core business offerings and higher margin product lines. Strategic decisions resulting from these reviews will be considered and could result in changes to the factors and assumptions used to determine the fair value of DowDuPonts reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets from those made in the purchase accounting from the Merger and the 2017 annual impairment testing process. Changes to those assumptions could significantly impact the results of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets impairment testing including a potential third quarter impairment.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements of Historical DuPont
Certain Guarantee Contracts
Information with respect to Historical DuPonts guarantees is included in note 14 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of
117
which this information statement forms a part. Historically, Historical DuPont has not had to make significant payments to satisfy guarantee obligations; however, Historical DuPont believes it has the financial resources to satisfy these guarantees.
Contractual Obligations
Information related to Historical DuPonts significant contractual obligations is summarized in the following table:
Payments Due In | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
Total as of
December 31, 2017 |
2018 | 2019 - 2020 | 2021 - 2022 |
2023 and
beyond |
|||||||||||||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations 1,2 |
$ | 11,113 | $ | 1,286 | $ | 5,010 | $ | 1,507 | $ | 3,310 | ||||||||||
Expected cumulative cash requirements for interest payments through maturity |
2,669 | 385 | 502 | 275 | 1,507 | |||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
1,044 | 264 | 327 | 185 | 268 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations 3 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Information technology infrastructure & services |
163 | 93 | 64 | 6 | | |||||||||||||||
Raw material obligations |
1,630 | 530 | 546 | 527 | 27 | |||||||||||||||
Utility obligations |
105 | 66 | 23 | 11 | 5 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
90 | 70 | 12 | 8 | | |||||||||||||||
Total purchase obligations |
1,988 | 759 | 645 | 552 | 32 | |||||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities 1,4 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Pension and other postemployment benefits |
8,139 | 456 | 778 | 730 | 6,175 | |||||||||||||||
Workers compensation |
78 | 13 | 35 | 15 | 15 | |||||||||||||||
Environmental remediation |
433 | 146 | 149 | 71 | 67 | |||||||||||||||
License agreements 5 |
1,173 | 230 | 382 | 316 | 245 | |||||||||||||||
Other 6 |
262 | 82 | 45 | 39 | 96 | |||||||||||||||
Total other long-term liabilities |
10,085 | 927 | 1,389 | 1,171 | 6,598 | |||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations 7 |
$ | 26,899 | $ | 3,621 | $ | 7,873 | $ | 3,690 | $ | 11,715 |
(1) |
Included in the consolidated financial statements. |
(2) |
Excludes unamortized debt step-up premium of $492 million. |
(3) |
Represents enforceable and legally binding agreements in excess of $1 million to purchase goods or services that specify fixed or minimum quantities; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the agreement. |
(4) |
Historical DuPonts contractual obligations do not reflect an offset for recoveries associated with indemnifications by Chemours in accordance with the 2015 Separation Agreement. Refer to notes 4 and 14 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional detail related to the indemnifications. |
(5) |
Represents undiscounted remaining payments under Pioneer license agreements ($1,079 million on a discounted basis). |
(6) |
Primarily represents employee-related benefits other than pensions and other postemployment benefits. |
(7) |
Due to uncertainty regarding the completion of tax audits and possible outcomes, the timing of certain payments of obligations related to unrecognized tax benefits cannot be made and have been excluded from the table above. See note 7 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, for additional detail. |
118
With the exception of the item below, there have been no material changes in Historical DuPonts contractual obligations since December 31, 2017.
Payments Due In | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
Total as of
June 30, 2018 |
Remainder
of 2018 |
2019 - 2020 | 2021 - 2022 |
2023 and
beyond |
|||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations |
||||||||||||||||||||
Raw material obligations |
$ | 1,999 | 544 | 759 | 677 | 19 |
Historical DuPont expects to meet its contractual obligations through its normal sources of liquidity and believes it has the financial resources to satisfy these contractual obligations.
Long-Term Employee Benefits of Historical DuPont
Historical DuPont has various obligations to its employees and retirees. Historical DuPont maintains retirement-related programs in many countries that have a long-term impact on Historical DuPonts earnings and cash flows. These plans are typically defined-benefit pension plans, as well as medical, dental and life insurance benefits for pensioners and survivors and disability benefits for employees (other postemployment benefits or OPEB plans). Approximately 80 percent of Historical DuPonts worldwide benefit obligation for pensions and essentially all of Historical DuPonts worldwide OPEB obligations are attributable to the U.S. benefit plans.
Pension coverage for employees of Historical DuPonts non-U.S. consolidated subsidiaries is provided, to the extent deemed appropriate, through separate plans. Historical DuPont regularly explores alternative solutions to meet its global pension obligations in the most cost-effective manner possible as demographics, life expectancy, and country-specific pension funding rules change. Where permitted by applicable law, Historical DuPont reserves the right to change, modify or discontinue its plans that provide pension, medical, dental, life insurance and disability benefits.
Benefits under defined-benefit pension plans are based primarily on years of service and employees pay near retirement. In November 2016, Historical DuPont announced changes to the U.S. pension and OPEB plans. Historical DuPont will freeze the pay and service amounts used to calculate pension benefits for active employees who participate in the U.S. pension plans on November 30, 2018. Therefore, as of November 30, 2018, active employees participating in the U.S. pension plans will not accrue additional benefits for future service and eligible compensation received. In addition to the changes to the U.S. pension plans, OPEB eligible employees who will be under the age of 50 as of November 30, 2018, will not receive postretirement medical, dental and life insurance benefits. As a result of these changes, Historical DuPont recognized a pretax curtailment gain of $382 million during the fourth quarter of 2016. The majority of employees hired in the United States on or after January 1, 2007 are not eligible to participate in the pension and postretirement medical, dental and life insurance plans, but receive benefits in the defined-contribution plans. In the fourth quarter of 2016, approximately $550 million of lump-sum payments were made from the principal U.S. pension plan trust fund to a group of separated, vested plan participants who were extended a limited-time opportunity and voluntarily elected to receive their pension benefits in a single lump-sum payment. In the fourth quarter of 2017, about $140 million of lump-sum payments were made from the principal U.S. pension plan trust fund under a similar program.
Pension benefits are paid primarily from trust funds established to comply with applicable laws and regulations. Unless required by law, Historical DuPont does not make contributions that are in excess of tax-deductible limits. The actuarial assumptions and procedures utilized are reviewed periodically by the plans actuaries to provide reasonable assurance that there will be adequate funds for the payment of benefits. Historical DuPont contributed $2,900 million to the principal U.S. pension plan for the period January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017. Historical DuPont is evaluating making a discretionary contribution to its principal U.S. pension plan in the third quarter of 2018. Any such contribution could be funded by existing cash balances and/or cash from other
119
available sources of liquidity. The determination to make such a contribution as well as the amount of any such contribution, depends on a number of factors including tax-deductible limits and capital structure considerations. Historical DuPont expects the amount of any contribution made to this plan in 2018 to be less than half of the contributions Historical DuPont made to this plan in 2017.
Funding for each pension plan other than the principal U.S. pension plan is governed by the rules of the sovereign country in which it operates. Thus, there is not necessarily a direct correlation between pension funding and pension expense. In general, however, improvements in plans funded status tends to moderate subsequent funding needs. Historical DuPont contributed $34 million, $67 million, $121 million and $164 million to its funded pension plans other than the principal U.S. pension plan for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
U.S. pension benefits that exceed federal limitations are covered by separate unfunded plans and these benefits are paid to pensioners and survivors from operating cash flows. Historical DuPonts remaining pension plans with no plan assets are paid from operating cash flows. Historical DuPont made benefit payments of $34 million, $57 million, $184 million and $144 million to its unfunded plans for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Historical DuPonts OPEB plans are unfunded and the cost of the approved claims is paid from operating cash flows. Pretax cash requirements to cover actual net claims costs and related administrative expenses were $59 million, $166 million, $218 million and $237 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Changes in cash requirements reflect the net impact of higher per capita health care costs, demographic changes, plan amendments, and changes in participant premiums, copays and deductibles.
In 2018, Historical DuPont expects to contribute approximately $200 million to its funded pension plans other than the principal U.S. pension plan and its remaining plans with no plan assets, and about $250 million for its OPEB plans.
Historical DuPonts income can be significantly affected by pension and defined-contribution benefits as well as OPEB costs. The following table summarizes the extent to which Historical DuPonts income for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was affected by pretax charges related to long-term employee benefits:
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Long-term employee benefit plan (benefit) charges 1 |
$ | (12 | ) | $ | 538 | $ | 442 | $ | 616 |
(1) |
The long-term employee benefit plan (benefit) charges include discontinued operations of $2 million, $8 million, $6 million and ($233) million for the periods September 1 through December 31, 2017 and January 1 through August 31, 2017 and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. |
The above (benefit) charges for pension and OPEB are determined as of the beginning of each period. Activity for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 benefited from the absence of the amortization of net losses from AOCL. Long-term employee benefit expense in 2016 include a $382 million curtailment gain as a result of changes made to the U.S. Pension and OPEB benefits in 2016 described above. See the section entitled Pension Plans and Other Postemployment Benefits for additional information on determining annual expense.
120
Environmental Matters of Historical DuPont
Historical DuPont operates global manufacturing, product handling, and distribution facilities that are subject to a broad array of environmental laws and regulations. Such rules are subject to change by the implementing governmental agency, and Historical DuPont monitors these changes closely. Historical DuPont policy requires that all operations fully meet or exceed legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, Historical DuPont implements voluntary programs to reduce air emissions, minimize the generation of hazardous waste, decrease the volume of water use and discharges, increase the efficiency of energy use and reduce the generation of persistent, bio-accumulative and toxic materials. Management has noted a global upward trend in the amount and complexity of proposed regulations. The costs to comply with complex environmental laws and regulations, as well as internal voluntary programs and goals, are significant and will continue to be significant for the foreseeable future. Pretax environmental expenses charged to income from continuing operations are summarized below:
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Environmental operating costs |
$ | 85 | $ | 205 | $ | 335 | $ | 346 | ||||||||
Environmental remediation costs |
$ | 8 | $ | 65 | $ | 62 | $ | 66 | ||||||||
Total environmental expenses |
$ | 93 | $ | 270 | $ | 397 | $ | 412 |
About 66 percent of total pretax environmental expenses charged to income from continuing operations for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 and for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, respectively, resulted from operations in the United States. Based on existing facts and circumstances, management does not believe that year over year changes, if any, in environmental expenses charged to current operations will have a material impact on Historical DuPonts financial position, liquidity or results of operations. Annual expenditures in the near term are not expected to vary significantly from the range of such expenditures experienced in the past few years. Longer term, expenditures are subject to considerable uncertainty and may fluctuate significantly.
Environmental Operating Costs
As a result of its operations, Historical DuPont incurs costs for pollution abatement activities, including waste collection and disposal, installation and maintenance of air pollution controls and wastewater treatment, emissions testing and monitoring, and obtaining permits. Historical DuPont also incurs costs related to environmental-related research and development activities, including environmental field and treatment studies, as well as toxicity and degradation testing to evaluate the environmental impact of products and raw materials.
121
Remediation Accrual
Changes in the remediation accrual balance are summarized below:
(Dollars in millions) | ||||
Balance at December 31, 2015 (Predecessor) |
$ | 492 | ||
Remediation payments |
(52 | ) | ||
Net increase in remediation accrual 1 |
62 | |||
Net change, indemnification 2 |
(45 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
$ | 457 | ||
Remediation payments |
(53 | ) | ||
Net increase in remediation accrual 1 |
65 | |||
Net change, indemnification 2 |
14 | |||
Balance at August 31, 2017 |
$ | 483 | ||
Balance at September 1, 2017 (Successor) |
483 | |||
Remediation payments |
(40 | ) | ||
Net increase in remediation accrual 1 |
8 | |||
Net change, indemnification 2 |
(18 | ) | ||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
$ | 433 |
(1) |
Excludes indemnified remediation obligations. |
(2) |
Net change in indemnified remediation obligations. Pursuant to the 2015 Separation Agreement, as discussed below and in note 4 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, Historical DuPont is indemnified by Chemours for certain environmental matters. |
Considerable uncertainty exists with respect to environmental remediation costs, and, under adverse changes in circumstances, the potential liability may range up to $920 million above the amount accrued as of December 31, 2017. However, based on existing facts and circumstances, management does not believe that any loss, in excess of amounts accrued, related to remediation activities at any individual site will have a material impact on the financial position, liquidity or results of operations of Historical DuPont.
Pursuant to the 2015 Separation Agreement discussed in note 4 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, Historical DuPont is indemnified by Chemours for certain environmental matters, included in the liability of $426 million at June 30, 2018 ($433 million at December 31, 2017), that have an estimated liability of $236 million at June 30, 2018 ($242 million at December 31, 2017) and a potential exposure that ranges up to approximately $420 million ($430 million at December 31, 2017) above the amount accrued. As such, Historical DuPont has recorded an indemnification asset of $236 million at June 30, 2018 ($242 million at December 31, 2017) corresponding to Historical DuPonts accrual balance related to these matters.
As of December 31, 2017, Historical DuPont has been notified of potential liability under the Superfund or similar state laws at approximately 500 sites around the United States, including approximately 100 sites for which Historical DuPont does not believe it has liability based on current information. As of December 31, 2017, active remediation was underway at 62 of these sites. In addition, Historical DuPont has resolved its liability at approximately 200 sites, either by completing remedial actions with other PRPs or by participating in de minimis buyouts with other PRPs whose waste, like Historical DuPonts, represented only a small fraction of the total waste present at a site. Historical DuPont received notice of potential liability at three new sites during 2017 compared with single notices in both 2016 and 2015.
122
Environmental Capital Expenditures
Capital expenditures for environmental projects, either required by law or necessary to meet Historical DuPonts internal environmental goals, were $18 million and $35 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 and for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, respectively.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk of Historical DuPont
Historical DuPonts global operations are exposed to financial market risks relating to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, and interest rates. Historical DuPont has established a variety of programs, including the use of derivative instruments and other financial instruments to manage the exposure to financial market risks as to minimize volatility of financial results. In the ordinary course of business, Historical DuPont enters into derivative instruments to hedge its exposure to foreign currency, interest rate, and commodity price risks under established procedures and controls. For additional information on these derivatives and related exposures, see note 18 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part. Decisions regarding whether or not to hedge a given commitment are made on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration the amount and duration of the exposure, market volatility, and economic trends. Foreign currency exchange contracts are also used, from time to time, to manage near-term foreign currency cash requirements.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risks
Historical DuPont has significant international operations resulting in a large number of currency transactions that result from international sales, purchases, investments, and borrowings. The primary currencies for which Historical DuPont has an exchange rate exposure are the European euro, Chinese yuan, Brazilian real and Japanese yen. Historical DuPont uses forward exchange contracts to offset its net exposures, by currency, related to the foreign-currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations. In addition to the contracts disclosed in note 18 to the annual consolidated financial statements, which are incorporated by reference herein and filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, Historical DuPont will from time to time enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to establish with certainty the U.S. dollar amount of future firm commitments denominated in a foreign currency.
The following table illustrates the fair values of outstanding foreign currency contracts at December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the effect on fair values of a hypothetical adverse change in the foreign exchange rates that existed at December 31, 2017 and 2016. The sensitivities for foreign currency contracts are based on a 10 percent adverse change in foreign exchange rates.
Fair Value (Liability)/Asset | Fair Value Sensitivity | |||||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
$ | (33 | ) | $ | 61 | $ | (863 | ) | $ | (567 | ) |
Since Historical DuPonts risk management programs are highly effective, the potential loss in value for each risk management portfolio described above would be largely offset by changes in the value of the underlying exposure.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Historical DuPont maintains cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, derivatives and certain other financial instruments with various financial institutions. These financial institutions are generally highly rated and geographically dispersed and Historical DuPont has a policy to limit the dollar amount of credit exposure with any one institution.
123
As part of Historical DuPonts financial risk management processes, Historical DuPont continually evaluates the relative credit standing of all the financial institutions that service Historical DuPont and monitors actual exposures versus established limits. Historical DuPont has not sustained credit losses from instruments held at financial institutions.
Historical DuPonts sales are not materially dependent on any single customer. As of December 31, 2017, no one individual customer balance represented more than five percent of Historical DuPonts total outstanding receivables balance. Credit risk associated with its receivables balance is representative of the geographic, industry and customer diversity associated with Historical DuPonts global product lines.
Historical DuPont also maintains strong credit controls in evaluating and granting customer credit. As a result, it may require that customers provide some type of financial guarantee in certain circumstances. Length of terms for customer credit varies by industry and region.
124
Our Company
Cortevawhich means center of naturecombines the DuPont Pioneer, Dow AgroSciences and DuPont Crop Protection businesses to create a stronger global provider of agricultural products. We are recognized by farmers as a leader in the seed and crop protection markets globally. Our seed platform develops and supplies high quality germplasm combined with advanced traits to produce higher yields for farmers around the world. Our crop protection platform supplies products to protect crop yields against weeds, insects and disease, enabling farmers to achieve optimal results. The combination of these leading platforms creates one of the broadest portfolios of agriculture solutions in the industry and generated pro forma annual sales of $14 billion for the year ended December 31, 2017 by fueling farmer productivity in more than 130 countries. Our strategy is to provide farmers with the right mix of seeds, crop protection and digital solutions to maximize their yields, strengthening customer relationships while ensuring an abundant food supply for a growing global population. We have the opportunity to enhance our performance by completing the delivery of $1.6 billion from merger-related synergies, including $1.1 billion in cost synergies and $500 million in growth synergies.
We will operate in two reportable segments: seed and crop protection. Our seed segment is a global leader in developing and supplying advanced germplasm and traits that produce optimum yield for farms around the world. We are a leader in many of our key seed markets, including North America corn and soybeans, Europe corn and sunflower, Brazil corn and Argentina corn. We offer trait technologies that improve resistance to weather, disease, insects and weeds, and trait technologies that enhance food and nutritional characteristics. We also provide digital solutions that assist farmer decision-making with a view to optimize product selection and, ultimately, maximize yield and profitability. We compete in a wide variety of agricultural markets. Our crop protection segment serves the global agricultural input industry with products that protect against weeds, insects and other pests, and disease, and that improve overall crop health both above and below ground via nitrogen management and seed-applied technologies. We are a leader in global herbicides, insecticides and below-ground nitrogen stabilizers.
We expect to create shareholder value by establishing a best-in-class cost structure, as benchmarked against our peers. Another key driver is driving disciplined capital and resource allocation processes, including a performance-based culture, with a strong focus on return on invested capital, and continuing to advance our science-based innovation. Our innovation is focused on delivering a wide range of improved products and services to our customers. Through our merger of the Historical DuPont and Historical Dow innovations pipelines, we have created one of the broadest and most productive new product pipelines in the agriculture industry. We intend to leverage our rich heritage of over 275 combined years of scientific achievement to advance our robust innovation pipeline and continue to shape the future of responsible agriculture. We intend to launch 21 new products, balanced between seeds and crop protection, between 2018 and 2021. New products are crucial to solving farmers productivity challenges amid a growing global population while addressing natural resistance, regulatory changes, safety requirements and competitive dynamics. Our investment in technology-based and solution-based product offerings allow us to meet farmers evolving needs while ensuring that our investments generate sufficient returns. Meanwhile, through our unique routes to market, we continue to work face-to-face with farmers around the world to deeply understand their needs.
Our Industry
The global agricultural landscape is rapidly changing as farmers continue to face a variety of challenges, including the need to feed a growing population with limited land and stricter rules and regulations surrounding biotechnology and chemical compounds. These rules and regulations, which may be enacted to protect farmers, consumers or the environment, often vary across geographies and can quickly change. Consumers are also re-shaping the industry by demanding healthier, more affordable and safer food, with an increased focus on
125
sustainability and greater transparency in order to facilitate their understanding of the agricultural products they purchase and consume.
These challenges, along with available data analysis allowing farmers to better understand the precise needs of a specific crop in a specific region, create strong incentives for farmers to invest in high technology inputs (such as seed, crop protection and digital solutions) to maximize yields, optimize resources and protect harvests in an environmentally sustainable manner. These technological advances in the agriculture industry challenge agriculture companies to develop customized technology-based and solution-based product offerings for farmers that address their specific needs.
Companies in our industry also continuously aim to improve existing product offerings to counteract regularly occurring natural resistance. For example, over the years, weeds and pests can evolve to become resistant to current modes of treatment. This resistance to existing products in turn creates both challenges as well as market opportunities for development of new forms of genetically engineered seed and improved complementary crop protection products and applications.
Given these rapidly evolving dynamics, it is critical for companies in the agriculture industry to be agile in adapting their product offerings to respond to changing farmer needs while addressing government regulations and market trends on both a global and localized scale. Companies in our industry in turn compete on the basis of germplasm and trait leadership; weed control as well as insect and disease management superiority; customer service; price; quality; and cost competitiveness, with an intensified focus on research and development and ability to respond to the growing proportion of off-patent seed and crop protection products. While the industry is evolving rapidly, the time and cost to launch new products has only increased. Our response to these global macro-trends is to leverage our deep farmer relationships and our industry leading platform to provide complete and customized solutions that meet the evolving needs of the farmer.
The global agricultural economy also continues to adjust to declines from the peak commodity prices related to the biofuels demand growth between 2007 and 2010 and the poor weather that reduced global commodity supply into 2013. The declines in prices and profit margins have led participants at all levels of the agricultural supply chain to adopt fundamental changes in their respective business models to maintain competitiveness, improve efficiency and enhance prospects for long-term growth. These factors, along with the high costs and lengthy time periods required to gain approvals and launch new products, have contributed to strategic realignments and consolidation across the agricultural sector. In recent years, our industry has undergone significant consolidation, resulting in an increase in market position by a smaller number of players and changing competitive dynamics.
Against this competitive landscape, Corteva intends to leverage its competitive strengths and harness its strong culture to win in the agriculture marketplace by quickly, effectively and attractively delivering solutions that improve the profitability, efficiency and sustainability of farms globally.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe the following attributes provide us with a competitive advantage in our industry:
Leadership position in key markets
We are a leader in many of our key seed markets, including North America corn and soybeans, Europe corn and sunflower, Brazil corn and Argentina corn. We are also a crop protection market leader in global herbicides, insecticides, biologics and below-the-ground nitrogen stabilizers. Our brand portfolio consists of some of the most recognized and premium brands in agriculture, such as our flagship premium Pioneer ® brand, APROACH ® Prima fungicide and QUELEX ® herbicide with ARYLEX ® active. We also have the largest and most robust germplasm pool in the world, spanning more than ten crops, including key crops such as corn, soybeans and sunflowers, providing us with a strong foundation for future value creation.
126
Strong customer relationships
We are a trusted partner in the global agriculture and food community, having earned the confidence of those who produce as well as those who consume. Our combination of market penetration, strong brand portfolio and robust germplasm allows us to serve as a trusted partner addressing a wide range of farmer needs in all major geographic regions and in many major crops. Our customer service model walks the acre, with our agents meeting face-to-face with farmers. In certain cases, these relationships extend over multiple generations. Through our unique direct access model, we continue to foster strong relationships by developing a deeper understanding of each farmers business. We are specialists in our products and the customers and regions we serve, and we customize our offerings to the market by understanding and responding to specific opportunities and challenges. Our knowledge of the customer also enhances our ability to effectively introduce new products that meet customer needs. We introduce test concepts to farmers in target markets as early as four years prior to market launches, allowing farmers to provide constant feedback on our new products and validate the efficacy and safety of our products, which also drives demand before the product launch. We also continue to listen and solicit feedback from farmers after the product launch in order to address their needs and continuously improve our offerings. This approach enhances the success of our new product launches. These strong customer relationships afford us the opportunity to more accurately anticipate customer needs and increase our likelihood of maintaining our customers and continuing to serve as their trusted provider.
Holistic solutions for farmers
We deliver a complete end-to-end farm management solution with integrated seed and crop protection offerings consisting of a broad range of products that provide farmers with an integrated approach to crop management. Through the combination of Historical DuPonts and Historical Dows complementary seed and crop protection portfolios, we are now able to serve farmers year-round, offering products covering more than 100 crops that give farmers expanded choice and greater value. In addition, our digital solutions bring clarity about the challenges and risks farmers face at an acre-by-acre level. Due to our broad portfolio of offerings, we enable farmers to fulfill all of their seed and crop protection needs from a single source, which enhances farmer loyalty.
Enhanced seed and crop protection pipelines
We have historically invested and will continue to invest significant funds in research and development. By integrating the Historical DuPont and Historical Dow pipelines, we have created one of the broadest and most innovative pipelines in the agricultural input industry. This integration has also enhanced the strengths of the individual pipelines through knowledge sharing and enabled us to leverage our industry-leading product depth and geographic scale. It has also allowed us to allocate research and development dollars more efficiently and leverage the best information available across platforms, accelerating timing for product launches.
In our seed segment, our leading digital breeding capabilities accelerate identification of native traits for desirable qualities such as maximizing yield as well as drought, disease and insect resistance. In addition, we have other advanced breeding technologies including the broadest CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) intellectual property estate in the agriculture industry. In our crop protection segment, our diverse portfolio of leading technology for weed control, insect and nematode management, disease management, nitrogen management and seed applied technology has been developed specifically for discrete regions around the globe. We are focused on expanding our existing robust crop protection pipeline by rapidly launching new products through expanding our proprietary disease control portfolio.
Deep industry expertise
We have a strong management team that combines in-depth industry experience and demonstrated leadership. James C. Collins, Jr., who will be our Chief Executive Officer, is the Chief Operating Officer for the Agriculture Division of DowDuPont and was previously an executive vice president of Historical DuPont responsible for the
127
companys agriculture segment, including DuPont Crop Protection and Pioneer. Gregory R. Friedman, who will be our Chief Financial Officer, is the Head of Finance for the Agriculture Division and Vice President, DuPont Investor Relations of DowDuPont. Our executive management team has a combined years of industry experience. Our leadership team represents leaders from both Historical DuPont and Historical Dow as we retained the top talent during the Merger and separation process. By assigning most of the Merger and integration work to separate focused teams, our business teams have been able to remain focused on driving the business forward and staying connected to customers and their evolving needs. Meanwhile, our team of dedicated scientists collaborates with external partners to advance agriculture systems and serves as a thoughtful, diligent advisor for communities, policymakers, regulatory bodies and institutions.
Our Strategy
We believe agriculture continues to undergo a global transformation, driven by population growth, environmental challenges and societal changes. As demand for food continues to grow, the pressure on farms to increase productivity and output will remain high. We believe this requirement provides the foundation of the long-term opportunity in agriculture.
Our strategy is to combine our proven innovation capability with our unmatched customer access to provide farmers with a portfolio of products that enable continued improvements in yield and profitability, while improving environmental sustainability.
To drive industry-leading value creation, we will pursue the following five priorities:
|
Deliver above-market growth via our robust new product pipeline and best-in-class routes to market. |
|
Consistently grow earnings across the agricultural cycle with a best-in-class cost structure. |
|
Drive disciplined capital and resource allocation with a strong focus on return on invested capital. |
|
Develop innovative solutions that improve farmer productivity and global food security. |
|
Instill a strong, performance-based, inclusive, customer-centric culture. |
More broadly, we believe the following key pillars will enable us to create significant value for our customers while delivering strong financial returns to our shareholders.
Develop and launch new offerings that address market needs
We expect to continue leveraging our robust pipeline to introduce new proprietary seed traits and crop protection formulations that anticipate and meet evolving customer needs. We intend to launch 21 new products, balanced between seeds and crop protection, between 2018 and 2021. Our pipeline is stronger than ever due to the combination of our two heritage companies. In addition, we intend to introduce further advanced technology that tracks and analyzes a farmers agricultural inputs, and provides additional transparency to allow farmers to make better and faster decisions, while increasing efficiency and reducing costs. We consider technology to be a key driver of our future success and are continuously building our expertise in the integration of technology with our seed and crop protection business.
Within the seed segment, we expect to introduce corn and soybean insect control traits with new modes of action, next generation technologies in soybeans including disease control, next generation of multiple mode herbicide tolerance traits in corn and soybeans, and next generation high-oleic oil soybeans. We plan to deliver these new offerings through a combination of in-licensing as well as our own innovation. For example, this year we are launching Enlist ® corn, building on earlier Enlist ® cotton launches as we await global approvals on Enlist E3 TM soybeans, all of which offer an insect protection trait. Within the crop protection segment, we expect to introduce new disease management technologies in cereals, row crops and specialty crops, while maintaining a continued
128
focus on natural product sourced solutions. The new Pyraxalt TM insecticide, for example, offers protection against piercing insects for key rice crops in Asia. We expect our combined pipeline to deliver novel solutions, with different and new modes of action, bringing groundbreaking and needed innovations to market faster through an enhanced product development process. Through the strength of this pipeline, we also expect to realize growth synergies at the intersection of seed and crop protection, leveraging our combined proprietary portfolio and expanding our seed applied technology across our multiple seed brands.
Utilize our multi-channel and multi-brand capabilities to drive profitable growth
The combination of DuPont Pioneer, Dow AgroSciences and DuPont Crop Protection allows us to strategically align our brands and capabilities across different sales channels and create a comprehensive multi-channel, multi-brand strategy. We intend to leverage the market strengths of each of our heritage companies, including their operations and sales and marketing capabilities, to broaden our geographic reach and market penetration by offering a wider range of complementary offerings. Our distribution model will service customers primarily through the legacy Pioneer direct sales channel in key agricultural geographies, including the United States. Through this model, we interact directly with farmers at multiple points in the growing season, from prior to planting all the way through harvest. These regular interactions enable us to provide the advice and service farmers need while giving us real-time insights into their future ordering decisions. This approach is supplemented by strong Dow AgroSciences retail channels including distributors, agricultural cooperatives and dealers. The indirect channels extend our reach and efficiently increase exposure of our products to other potential buyers, including smaller farmers or farmers in less concentrated areas. We believe this strategy will make our seed more widely available in retail channels, providing for cross platform growth in both our seed and crop protection platforms. This enhanced approach allows us to have a complete go-to-market strategy covering the direct, dealer and retail chains. As a result, we can offer a complete solution for the farmer, with a localized approach. Moving forward under this approach, the Pioneer ® brand, one of our premium global seed brands, will continue to be primarily delivered through our unique, direct route-to-market channel. Brevant TM seeds, also a premium global brand, will primarily serve retail channels outside of the United States. In addition to these two premium global seed brands, we will continue to offer quality country- and region-specific seed brands that complete one of the broadest, most diverse seed portfolios in the world.
Continue to develop and maintain close connections with our customers
We work closely with farmers throughout the entire growing season to ensure all their seed and crop protection needs are anticipated and satisfied. We listen to the customer to understand not only what they want today, but more importantly, what they will need tomorrow and well into the future. This collaboration helps inform our seed and crop protection innovation decisions and focus by allowing us to better understand the value drivers for farmers. We are committed to rigorous ongoing sales training, territory planning and management systems that enable our people to match solutions to specific geographic regions to continue to demonstrate our commitment to our customers.
Focus on operational excellence
Creating a strong agriculture company with a best-in-class cost structure requires that we integrate our operations and continue to drive operating efficiencies, enabling a streamlined, efficient and focused organization. We expect to benefit from significant cost synergies through the Synergy Program adopted by DowDuPont, including through the achievement of production cost efficiencies, enhancement of the agricultural supply chain, elimination of duplicative agricultural research and development programs, optimization of our global footprint across manufacturing, sales and research and development, the realization of significant procurement synergies and the reduction of corporate and leveraged services costs. Following our separation, we intend to migrate toward a single instance of the SAP enterprise resource planning software, which we believe will enhance our productivity and serve as the springboard to continuous improvement in our cost structure over time.
129
Beyond the cost synergies, we are taking actions to capitalize on growth synergy opportunities, estimated at $500 million in the aggregate, created by the union of our heritage companies. We are capitalizing on market access by delivering holistic solutions for farmers via the combination of seeds, crop protection and services, including by expanding our offerings in categories and regions where we are currently underpenetrated. We also intend to enhance our portfolio via portfolio combinations, crop protection mixtures and seed treatment enhancements from a larger proprietary portfolio.
Commitment to sustainable and responsible agriculture
We are committed to remaining a leader in responsible agriculture, environmental stewardship, food safety and security. By focusing on integrating sustainability criteria early in the product discovery and development phases, we promote the development of responsible solutions focused on reducing the environmental impact of agriculture over time. For example, our nitrogen management solutions allow nitrogen to be available longer at the plants root zone, permitting farmers to use less of the product and reducing runoff, thereby reducing the products environmental impact while improving the profitability of farmers. Our seed segments digital solutions provide information that enables farmers to operate more efficiently and more sustainably by leveraging actionable operational and agronomic insights.
We also are bringing naturally-sourced products to the market. We recently received approval of the active substance, Inatreq TM , for use in the European Union. This innovative product offers a new mode of action to control septoria, a disease that has been reducing wheat yields in many parts of Europe. Inatreq is produced by fermentation and is derived from natural sources, which we believe will appeal to many farmers in this market.
We intend to introduce environmentally sustainable solutions that not only satisfy our customers needs but also contribute to creating a world with a better future. We will continue to work alongside producers to connect the dots across the value chain and deliver targeted products and services designed to enable increased productivity while maintaining our commitment to responsible stewardship, food safety and security. We also intend to integrate sustainability in our everyday procedures.
We have been recognized with five EPA Presidential Green Chemistry Awards. These are prestigious annual awards that recognize chemical technologies that incorporate the principle of green chemistry into chemical design, manufacture and use. Our commitment to sustainable and responsible agriculture and our diverse set of products has positioned us as an industry leader in certain markets, such as Europe, with stringent environmental and food safety regulations.
Our Portfolio
We will operate in two reportable segments: seed and crop protection.
Our Seed Segment
(1) |
Overview |
Our seed segment currently provides solutions in over 70 countries. The combination of DuPont Pioneers and Dow AgroSciences complementary portfolios allows us to offer farmers solutions in several key crops, including corn, soybean, sunflowers and wheat, and complementary crops such as alfalfa, canola, cotton, rice and sorghum, as well silage inoculants. Our seed segment also offers digital solutions that provide farmers access to real-time information enabled through technology. In 2017, our seed segment generated, on a pro forma basis, $8.1 billion of net sales and $1.2 billion of Segment Operating EBITDA. For the six months ended June 30,
130
2018, our seed segment generated, on a pro forma basis, $6.2 billion of net sales and $1.6 billion of Segment Operating EBITDA.
(2) |
Products and Brands |
Our seed segments major brands and technologies, by key product line, are listed below:
|
Brands and Technologies | |
Seed Solutions Brands | Brevant ; Pioneer ® ; Dairyland Seed ® ; MYCOGEN ® ; Hoegemeyer ® ; NuTech ® ; Seed Consultants ® ; Terral ® ; Ag Venture ® ; Alforex ® ; PhytoGEN ® ; PANNAR ® ; VPMaxx ® ; RPM ® ; HPT ® ; G2 ® ; Supreme EX ® ; XL ® ; Power Plus ® ; IMPACT ® ; BioGene ® ; Nord ® | |
Seed Solutions Traits and Technologies | ENLIST weed control; ENLIST DUO ® herbicide; EXZACT Precision Technology; HERCULEX ® Insect Protection; Pioneer ® brand hybrids with Leptra ® insect protection technology offering protection against above ground pests; POWERCORE Insect Trait Technology 2 ; Pioneer brand Optimum ® AcreMax ® family of products offering above and below ground insect protection; REFUGE ADVANCED powered by SMARTSTAX ® 2 ; SMARTSTAX ® Insect Trait Technology 2; NEXERA seed offering increased canola yield potential; Omega-9 Healthier Oils; Pioneer ® brand Optimum ® AquaMax ® hybrids; Pioneer brand corn hybrids; PIONEER brand A-Series soybeans; Pioneer brand soybeans with the Plenish ® high oleic trait; Pioneer brand sunflower hybrids with the DUPONT ExpressSun ® herbicide tolerant; Pioneer Protector ® products for canola and sunflower; Pioneer MAXIMUS ® rapeseed hybrids; PROPOUND | |
Other | LumiGEN technologies seed treatment portfolio of offeringsLUMIDERM and LUMIVIA; GRANULAR ® ; ACREVALUE; Encirca services |
Our premium Pioneer brand sells the highest-quality corn, soybeans, sorghum, sunflower, alfalfa, canola, wheat, rice, pearl millet and mustard seeds. Pioneer brand corn continues to show superiority in germplasm and received numerous honors at the 2017 National Corn Growers Association Yield Contest, including nine national and 191 state awards. Pioneer brand sorghum also continues to show superiority by receiving six national category awards at the 2017 National Sorghum Producers Yield and Management Contest. Moving forward, the Pioneer brand will remain the companys global flagship seed brand. Dairyland Seeds ® , Hoegemeyer ® , Seed Consultants ® , NuTech ® , REV ® , VPMaxx ® , RPM ® , HPT ® , G2 ® , SupremeEX ® , XL ® and PowerPlus ® will serve the U.S. regional market. Mycogen ® and REV ® will serve the U.S. retail market, with our new premium Brevant brand serving retail markets outside of the United States.
131
Our digital solutions include the most comprehensive farm management software solution available in the industry. Our product strategy is to support all agronomy and financial decisions, to connect the farm to advisors and suppliers and to build digital marketplaces. Through our solutions, we aim to create new connections to customers and consumers and to make farming more productive.
In addition, we utilize specialized seed-applied technology to offer farmers the option of purchasing seeds pretreated with a coating of certain of our crop chemicalsalone or in combinationsthat enhance the seeds performance. The cross-category opportunity is one of our many sources of growth in our seed segment.
(3) |
Pipeline and Product Development |
Biotechnology traits offer solutions to insect, disease and weed challenges, and provide consumer-driven solutions for food grade characteristics, such as Pioneer brand Plenish ® high oleic soybean oil. We believe we have the largest, most robust germplasm pool in the world for key crops such as corn, soybeans and sunflowers, spanning more than ten crops in more than 70 countries.
Gene discovery is accomplished by a dedicated team of in-house experts as well as external partnerships. We strive to identify novel trait combinations that can enable plants to successfully weather the challenges of water and nutrient deficiencies, and cope with unfavorable climate and regional pressures.
Advanced breeding, using CRISPR, allows breeders to focus on specific desired features, such as nutrition or disease resistance. CRISPR technology can be programmed to target specific stretches of genetic code and to edit DNA at precise locations, allowing researchers to modify genes in living cells and organisms and providing for accelerated development of new trait concepts broadly across many crops. This technology can accelerate time to market by more than 50 percent, or three to four years faster than conventional breeding methods. We have the broadest CRISPR intellectual property estate in the seed production industry.
Digital breeding capabilities provide targeted solutions in areas such as insect and disease resistance, yield, increased nutritional value, improved food characteristics and drought tolerance. Digital breeding leverages advanced technology to enable more accurate identification of the numerous traits in the digital imprint of the genome of our germplasm that are linked to desired characteristics. This technology allows us to quickly identify and isolate those traits, enhances our breeding capabilities and shortens time to market.
Our seed segment continues to expand with new product launches as well as growth in emerging geographies and markets. We expect that our strong North American presence will be enhanced by the full ENLIST, Pioneer brand Qrome products ® and Next Generation insect control launches. While significant government regulatory approvals have largely been obtained for the commercialization of ENLIST Corn, Soybeans and Cotton, regulatory approvals for ENLIST products in certain countries are still pending. We expect that the ramp-up of Pioneer ® brand Leptra ® insect protection technology and increased POWERCORE ULTRA penetration, as well as the introduction of CONKESTA soybeans, will strengthen our position in Latin America.
Corn
We have an extensive corn portfolio and innovation pipeline with market opportunities around the world. We are pursuing a balanced portfolio of proprietary and licensed trait technologies for corn. Our goal is to develop technology that boosts margins, improves efficacy, renews our portfolio and creates out-license opportunities. We believe that the launch of our proprietary Pioneer brand Qrome ® products and Next Generation insect control will unlock additional potential in our broad corn germplasm base. Both products significantly enhance our ability to compete in the above and below ground insect resistance segment within the U.S. market. We intend to continue to strengthen our global position, especially in Latin America, as we focus on the penetration of POWERCORE ULTRA, corn traits focused largely on a Latin American need to provide three different modes of
132
action to deter aggressive pests unique to the region, among other product launches. We have also made notable strides in strengthening our germplasm bank to enable more solutions for Latin America.
Product |
Stage |
Target Market |
Market Opportunity in Acres |
|||
Key Product Concepts |
||||||
Powercore ® | 6 | North America, Latin America | 50-100 | |||
Qrome ® Products | 5 | North America | 50-100 | |||
Enlist | 5 | North America, Latin America | >100 | |||
Powercore ® Ultra | 5 | Latin America | 50-100 | |||
SmartStax ® Pro | 4 | North America | 50-100 | |||
NextGen Biotech Solutions |
||||||
Yield and Yield Stability | 3 | North America | 50-100 | |||
Multiple Mode Herbicide Tolerance | 2 | North America, Latin America | >100 | |||
New MOA Lepidopteran Protection III | 2 | North America, Latin America, Asia Pacific, Africa | >100 | |||
New MOA Lepidopteran Protection IV | 2 | North America, Latin America, Asia Pacific, Africa | >100 | |||
New MOA Coleopteran Protection III | 2 | North America | 50-100 | |||
New MOA Coleopteran Protection IV | 1 | North America | 50-100 | |||
Digital Breeding Technologies | ||||||
Unified Corn Silage | 5 | North America, Europe, Latin America | <50 | |||
Next Gen Waxy | 3 | North America, Latin America | <50 |
Soybean
We have an extensive soybean portfolio and innovation pipeline focused on North America and Latin America. Our breeding program leadership in soybeans has proven successful in driving value in yield and productivity in North America. We are applying and leveraging those approaches in Latin America as we develop new products and introduce new trait offerings into the market. The soybean pipeline draws on a long, proven history of breeding expertise to offer broad genetics with strong performance, backed by world class research and development to create a rich pipeline of near-, mid- and long-term solutions. For example, our Pioneer ® brand A-Series soybean varieties are developed from the most extensive localized soybean breeding and product testing program in the industry, with a focus on customizing varieties for local yield environments. By increasing our molecular marker output by 20 times, we have introduced 110 new A-series varieties in the last two years, offering higher yields than the T-Series varieties these seeds replace.
We have selectively in-licensed and acquired third-party genetics to build soy germplasm platforms and have developed or acquired licenses to certain technologies that we deem necessary or useful for the development of
133
biotechnology traits for soybeans, pursuant to which we pay certain royalties as a percentage of sales of products covered by the licensed patents. Over the long term, we intend to move toward a more proprietary trait offering for soybeans, while currently leveraging a combination of licensed and proprietary traits. This transition will introduce new product concepts and increase out-licensing opportunities.
We are leveraging the strength of our geographic footprint to expand farmer access to technologies including Pioneer ® brand soybeans with Roundup Ready 2 Xtend ® , LibertyLink ® technologies and BOLT ® technology, and our future expanded launches of ENLIST E3 and CONKESTA E3, all providing broad spectrum weed control, as well as Pioneer brand Plenish ® high oleic soybean oil.
Product |
Stage |
Target Market |
Market Opportunity in Acres |
|||
Key Product Concepts | ||||||
Roundup Ready 2 Xtend ® technology | 6 | North America | 50-100 | |||
Intacta RR2 PRO ® technology | 5 | Latin America | 50-100 | |||
Plenish ® High Oleic Soybean | 6 | North America | <50 | |||
Enlist E3 | 5 | North America, Latin America | >100 | |||
Conkesta E3 | 4 | Latin America | >100 | |||
Plenish ® High Oleic Soybean with MMHT | 3 | North America | <50 | |||
NextGen Biotech Solutions | ||||||
Increase Soybean Oil and Improved Meal Value | 2 | North America, Latin America | >100 | |||
Multiple Mode Herbicide Tolerance II | 2 | North America, Latin America | >100 | |||
New MOA Lepidopteran Protection | 2 | Latin America | >100 | |||
Asian Soybean Rust Resistance | 1 | Latin America | 50-100 | |||
Digital Breeding Technologies | ||||||
NextGen High Oleic Soybean Oil | 1 | North America | 50-100 |
Complimentary Crops
While corn and soybeans each continue to be a core focus, we remain committed to maintaining a broad portfolio of offerings such as cotton, canola, sunflowers, rice, silage inoculants, sorghum and wheat. This expansive portfolio enables us to provide solutions customizable to local and regional preferences, serve the full range of farmer needs throughout the year, cultivate customer intimacy and adapt as farming trends shift in the long-term. We believe that the combined strengths of Historical DuPont and Dow AgroSciences has positioned us well to deliver healthy oils to the consumer, including PROPOUND ® , a high protein canola meal for animal production, and NEXERA ® seeds that produce Omega 9 sunflower oil, a saturated fat free oil product for food manufacturers.
134
Product |
Stage |
Target Market |
Market Opportunity in Acres |
|||
Widestrike Insect Protection Enlist Cotton | 6 | North America | <50 | |||
Optimum Gly Herbicide Tolerance | 4 | North America, Asia Pacific | <50 | |||
Herbicide Tolerant Canola witH LibertyLink Trait | 4 | North America, Europe, Asia Pacific | <50 | |||
Pro Pound Advanced Canola Meal | 4 | North America, Europe, Asia Pacific | <50 | |||
Omega 3 Reduced Saturate Sunflower | 4 | North America, Europe, Latin America | <50 |
(4) |
Raw Materials and Supply Chain |
Our raw materials and supplies include corn and soybean seeds. To produce our high-quality seeds, we contract with third-party growers globally who are leaders in the industry. We focus on production close to the customer to ensure the seed product is developed specifically for that region and its weed, insect and disease challenges, weather, soil and other conditions. We condition and package the seeds using our own plants. By striking a balance between owning production facility assets directly and contracting with third-party growers, we believe we are best able to maintain flexibility to react to demand changes unique to each geography while minimizing costs. We seek to partner with strategic seed growers and share our digital agronomy and product management knowledge with them. Our growers are an important part of our supply chain. We provide them with rigorous training, planning tools and access to a system that tests and advances products matched to specific geographic needs.
Our research and development and supply chain groups work seamlessly to select and maintain product characteristics that enhance the quality of our seed products. With our large sets of digitized data and our seed field management solution, we can manage our field operations efficiently and draw insights from our data quickly and effectively. This allows our supply chain to react quickly to changing customer needs and provides research and development with tremendous amounts of data to analyze and incorporate into resource allocation decisions. We are continuing to invest in and build capabilities that drive value via data digitization and analytics that enable us to create an even more responsive and efficient answer to customer needs.
The seed production footprint will be a balance between owned production facilities and third-party contracts to maintain flexibility to react to demand changes unique to each geography while minimizing costs.
Our Crop Protection Segment
(1) |
Overview |
We are a global leader in developing and supplying crop protection products and services for more than 100 crops using more than 65 active ingredients in more than 130 countries. We offer a diverse range of crop protection products that service field crops such as wheat, corn, soybean, sunflower, canola/oilseed rape and rice as well as specialty crops such as fruit, nut, vine, sugarcane, coffee and vegetables. In 2017, our crop protection segment generated, on a pro forma basis, $6.1 billion of net sales and $1.0 billion of Segment Operating EBITDA. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, our crop protection segment generated, on a pro forma basis, $3.3 billion of net sales and $0.7 billion of Segment Operating EBITDA.
Our diverse portfolio of leading technology for weed control, insect and nematode management, disease management, nitrogen management and seed applied technology has been developed specifically for discrete regions around the globe. We offer crop protection solutions that provide farmers the tools they need to improve productivity and profitability, and help keep fields free of weeds, insects and diseases. Our crop protection portfolio includes differentiated and high-value products driven by our innovation capability, and we drive competitive cost advantage through our focus on operational excellence.
135
(2) |
Products and Brands |
Our crop protection segments major brands and technologies, by key product line, include:
|
Insect and Nematode Management : CLOSER ® , DELEGATE ® , INTREPID ® , ISOCLAST ® , LANNATE ® , EXALT, PEXALON ® , TRANSFORM ® , VYDATE ® , OPTIMUM ® , RADIANT, SENTRICON ® , ENTRUST SC, GF-120 and TRACER |
|
Disease Management : APPROACH PRIMA ® , VESSARYA ® , APPROACH POWER ® , TALENDO ® , TALIUS ® , EQUATION ® PRO, EQUATION ® CONTACT, ZORVEC ® , DITHANE, INATREQ, CURZATE ® , TANOS ® , FONTELIS ® , ACANTO ® AND GALILEO ® |
|
Weed Control : ARIGO ® , ARYLEX ® , ENLIST DUO ® , BROADWAY, RINSKOR, ZYPAR ® , MUSTANG ® , GALLANT ® , VERDICT ® , LANCET ® , KERB ® , PIXXARO ® , QUELEX ® , GALLERY, CENT-7, SNAPSHOT, TRELLIS, CITADEL, CLIPPER, GRANITE, RAINBOW, PINDAR GT, VIPPER, WIDEATTACK, BELKAR ® , WIDEMATCH ® , PERFECTMATCH ® , CLINCHER ® , DURANGO, FENCER, GARLON ® , SONIC, TEXARO, KEYSTONE, PACTO, LIGATE, DIMENSION ® , TOPSHOT ® , RICER ® , LOYANT ® , CLASSIC, REALM Q, TRIVENCE, LONTREL, GRAZON ® , PANZER, PRIMUS, RESICORE, SPIDER, STARANE ® , SURESTART and TORDON |
|
Nitrogen Management : INSTINCT ® , N-SERVE NITROGEN STABILIZER and N-LOCK |
136
(3) |
Pipeline and Product Development |
Our rich and diverse pipeline includes novel chemistry, new modes of action and biological and natural products. We expect our robust pipeline will shift our crop protection solutions portfolio to be more differentiated, proprietary and cost advantaged.
Product |
Stage |
Target Market |
||
Weed Control | ||||
Rinskor New MOA Broad Spectrum Weed Control | 5 | Rice, Corn | ||
Enlist | 5 | Corn, Oil, Seed | ||
Three New Classes of Weed Control Leads | 0 | |||
New Class of Broad Leaf Weed Control | 0 | |||
Insect and Nematode Control | ||||
Lumiva ® Seed Treatment | 6 | Rice, Corn, Oil Seed | ||
Lumiposa Seed Treatment | 6 | Corn, Oil Seed | ||
Pyraxalt, New Class of Insect Control for Piercing Pests | 5 | Rice | ||
Vellozine, New MOA Nematicide | 4 | Oil Seed | ||
Two New Insects or Nematode Control Loads | 0 | |||
New Class of Insect Control | 0 | |||
New Mode of Action for Insect Control | 0 | |||
Two New Classes of Insect Control for Piercing Pests | 0 |
Weed Control
Our weed control portfolio has novel offerings that address weed control needs in row crops, cereals, rice, plantations and specialty crops, as well as in pastures and land management. New innovations include a rice protection offering, RINKSOR active herbicide, which expands our leadership position in the global rice market with high efficacy and a favorable environmental profile, and ARYLEX active herbicide, which offers farmers powerful control over a wide spectrum of broadleaf weeds at low use rates. The full Enlist weed control system is a cross platform solution of both seed and crop protection, demonstrating the unique strength and distinct competitive advantage of a complete trait and chemistry offering. Our proprietary COLEX-D ® technology has been validated in-field with proven reductions in both drift and volatility. These proof points further support the value we expect this complete system to deliver for farmers dealing with complex resistance issues.
Insect and Nematode Management
Crop protection solves insect problems with preventive measures as well as fast acting responses to deter and eliminate chewing insects, parasitic nematodes and other pests above and below the ground. We are a leader in natural products with offerings such as Spinosad and Spinetoram, which have been recognized with U.S. EPA Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards. Our insect management portfolio includes Isoclast insect management, which was launched in 32 countries in 2016 and an additional 16 countries in 2017. Isoclast is the next generation of insect management technology and an important tool for insect resistance management. Our portfolio also includes Spinetoram, a broad spectrum low use rate insect management tool, which shows high efficacy against target insects with a margin of safety towards beneficial insects. Additionally, we recently launched Pyraxalt insect management, which is specially developed to protect rice crops in Asia with novel activity for control of hopper insects. Pyraxalt insect management is expected to set a new standard for high potency and low use-rate, with a favorable environmental profile.
137
Disease Management
Our disease management portfolio includes our Inatreq brand, a naturally-sourced product with a favorable environmental profile, which recently received approval for use in Europe. During extensive field trials, Inatreq has consistently delivered outstanding performance and we believe it will be an innovative and effective tool in helping farmers who face increased disease resistance challenges. Our Zorvec ® fungicide delivers consistent and longer control of diseases for growers of potatoes, grapes and vegetables. Another fungicide that we recently launched in Brazil, Vessarya, combines two leading fungicides to provide excellent efficacy against Asian Soybean Rust, a devastating plant disease. Testing has shown that Vessarya provides superior performing control of Asian Soybean Rust, with a higher average yield compared to competitive treatments.
Seed Applied Technologies
Seed applied technologies are cross-segment solutions that assist farmers in providing their crops with healthy starts, maximizing the genetic potential of their seeds, and enable early season growth for greater yield potential at harvest for corn, soybeans, canola and rice. Seed applied technologies include fungicides, insecticides, nematicides and other enhancers that promote plant vigor. The value we expect to capture in this area is an important component of our overall growth synergy potential, as we have an opportunity to formulate products that draw on the offerings of both Historical DuPont and Historical Dow crop protection and distribute them through our multi-channel, multi-brand approach. Capturing this value will be a meaningful proof-point of the competitive advantage of our comprehensive product portfolio. Our seed applied technologies include brands such as Dermacor, Lumiderm, Lumiposa, Lumivia and Lumisena. Dermacor rice seed treatment is highly effective in controlling stemborers and rice water weevil, the most widespread and economically damaging rice crop insect. Lumiderm insect management seed treatment is the first treatment for canola growers that provides excellent control for cutworms and improved consistency in protection against flea beetles. Lumiposa selectively controls pests that feed on plant tissue and has a favorable environmental profile. Lumivia insect management seed treatment helps corn growers protect their seed investment with broad-spectrum protection against key insect pests during vulnerable early season development. Lumisena fungicide seed treatment provides a solution for losses due to Phytophthora in soybeans and downy mildew in sunflower.
(4) |
Raw Materials and Supply Chain |
Our raw materials and supplies include benzene derivatives, other aromatics and carbamic acid related intermediates, insect control products, natural gas and seed treatments. Typically, we purchase major raw materials through long-term contracts with multiple suppliers, which sometimes require minimum purchase commitments. Certain important raw materials are supplied by a few major suppliers. We expect the markets for our raw materials to remain balanced, though pricing may be volatile given the current state of the global economy. We rely on contract manufacturers, both domestically and internationally, to produce certain inputs or key components for our product formulations. These inputs are typically sourced close to where we ultimately formulate and sell our products. We strive to maintain multiple high-quality supply sources for each input.
Cortevas supply chain strategy will involve managing global supplies of active and intermediate ingredients sourced regionally with global best practices and oversight. Our supply strategy includes a robust and flexible global footprint to meet future portfolio growth. Our supply chain also provides competitive advantages including reducing time to meet customer requirements in regions while minimizing costs through the value chain.
Multi-Channel, Multi-Brand Distribution
In 2018, we began to roll out our multi-channel, multi-brand strategy. We believe our multi-channel, multi-brand strategy will differentiate us from our competition and drive growth by presenting us with a route to market in which we are uniquely positioned to win business. Our strengths and unique direct-engagement approach enable
138
us to deliver solutions farmers can trust through whatever channel they prefer, including agency, dealer or direct, retail or co-operative, or licensing channels.
We intend to leverage the market strengths of each of our heritage companies, including their operations and sales and marketing capabilities, to broaden our geographic reach and market penetration by offering a wider range of complementary offerings. Our distribution model will service customers primarily through the legacy Pioneer direct sales channel in key agricultural geographies, including the United States. Through this model, we interact directly with farmers at multiple points in the growing season, from prior to planting all the way through harvest. These regular interactions enable us to provide the advice and service farmers need while giving us real-time insights into their future ordering decisions. This approach is supplemented by the strong Dow AgroSciences retail channels including distributors, agricultural cooperatives and farmer dealers. The indirect channels extend our reach and efficiently increase exposure of our products to other potential buyers, including smaller farmers or farmers in less concentrated areas. We believe this strategy will make our seed more widely available in retail channels, providing for cross platform growth in both our seed and crop protection platforms. This enhanced approach allows us to have a complete go-to-market strategy covering the direct, dealer and retail chains. As a result, we can offer a complete solution for the farmer, with a localized approach.
Moving forward under this approach, the Pioneer ® brand, one of our premium global seed brands, will continue to be primarily delivered through our unique, direct route-to-market channel. Brevant seeds, also a premium global brand, will primarily serve retail channels outside of the United States. In addition to these two premium global seed brands, we will continue to offer quality country- and region-specific seed brands that complete one of the broadest, most diverse seed portfolios in the world.
Seasonality
Our sales are generally strongest in the first half of the calendar year, which aligns with the planting and growing season in the northern hemisphere. The seasonality in sales impacts both our seed and crop protection segments. Our direct distribution channel, where products are shipped to farmers, is more affected by planting delays than our competitors. Generally speaking, unfavorable weather slows the planting season and can affect our quarterly results and sales mix. Severe unfavorable weather, however, can impact overall sales. Accounts receivable tends to be higher during the first half of the year, consistent with the peak sales period in the northern hemisphere.
Facilities
We operate out of our headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware. We also maintain one global business center in Johnston, Iowa for our seed business and another in Indianapolis, Indiana for our crop protection business. Our manufacturing, processing, marketing and research and development facilities, as well as regional purchasing
139
offices and distribution centers are located throughout the world. Following the separation, we expect to operate 157 manufacturing sites in approximately 30 countries in the following geographic regions:
Seed |
Crop
Protection |
Total | ||||||||||
Asia Pacific |
13 | 10 | 23 | |||||||||
EMEA |
24 | 6 | 30 | |||||||||
Latin America |
23 | 7 | 30 | |||||||||
U.S. & Canada |
68 | 6 | 74 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
128 | 29 | 157 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our properties will include facilities which, in the opinion of management, are expected to be suitable and adequate for their use and will have sufficient capacity for our current needs and expected near-term growth. All our plants are owned or leased, subject to certain easements of other persons which, in the opinion of management, do not substantially interfere with the continued use of such properties or materially affect their value. No title examination of the properties has been made for the purpose of this information statement.
Intellectual Property
We consider our intellectual property estate, which includes patents, trade secrets, trademarks and copyrights, in the aggregate, to constitute a valuable asset of Corteva and we actively seek to secure intellectual property rights as part of an overall strategy to protect our investment in innovations and maximize the results of our research and development program. While we believe that our intellectual property estate, taken as a whole, provides a competitive advantage in many of our businesses, no single patent, trademark, license or group of related patents or licenses is in itself essential to us as a whole or to any of our segments.
Based on our patent estate at December 31, 2017, after our separation and distribution we expect to hold more than 7,000 active patents for our Seeds platform and more than 5,000 active patents for our Crop Protection platform. The protection afforded by these patents varies based on country and scope of individual patent coverage, as well as the availability of legal remedies in each country.
We also own or have licensed a substantial number of tradenames, trademarks and trademark registrations in the United States and other countries, including over 13,000 registrations and pending trademark applications in a number of jurisdictions.
In addition, we hold multiple long-term biotechnology trait licenses from third parties as a normal course of business. Most corn hybrids and soybean varieties sold to customers contain biotechnology traits licensed from third parties under these long-term licenses.
To facilitate our separation and distribution, and allow our, Dows and New DuPonts operations to continue with minimal interruption, we expect to enter a series of intellectual property license agreements. For more information, see the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the Distribution.
Employees
We have approximately 21,500 employees, approximately 16.5 percent of whom are represented by unions. We hire, train, and retain some of the leading scientists and engineers in the agriculture and biotechnology space. It is our mission to provide our employees with challenging and rewarding careers. Management believes its relations with its employees to be good.
Competitive Landscape
We compete with producers of seed germplasm and crop protection products on a global basis. The global market for products within the industry is highly competitive and we believe competition will intensify with
140
industry consolidation. We compete based on germplasm and trait leadership, price, quality and cost competitiveness and the offering of a holistic solution. Our competitors include brand names, companies trading in generic crop protection chemicals and regional seed companies.
Regulatory Considerations
Corteva Seed and Crop Protection Science
Our seed and crop protection products and operations are subject to certain approval procedures, manufacturing requirements and environmental protection laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. We evaluate and test products throughout the research and development phases, and each new technology undergoes further rigorous scientific studies and tests to ensure that the product can be used effectively and that use of the technology is safe for humans and animals and does not cause undue harm to the environment.
The regulatory approval processes and procedures globally have grown increasingly more complex, which has resulted in additional tests, time investment and higher development and maintenance costs. We continue to invest on an ongoing basis to keep dossiers current, respond to regulators and meet regulatory standards required by global regulatory frameworks.
Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs)
Genetically modified seed products are subject to regulatory approval processes and procedures. For example, in the United States, the Coordinated Framework for Regulation of Biotechnology governs genetically modified organisms, using existing U.S. legislation and legal authorities on food, feed and environmental safety. Plant GMOs are regulated by the U.S. Department of Agricultures (the USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (the APHIS) under the Plant Protection Act. The APHIS assesses the trait to ensure that the trait will not pose a plant pest and is not a noxious weed. GMOs in food are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (the FDA) under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FFDCA). The FDA ensures that the food is safe for food and feed. Pesticides and microorganisms containing GMOs are regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) pursuant to the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (the FIFRA) and the Toxic Substances Control Act. The EPA assesses the trait or the stack containing the traits to ensure that there is no unreasonable adverse effect to the environment.
Other countries also have rigorous approval processes, procedures, and scientific testing requirements for the cultivation or import of genetically modified seed products. In the United States and other countries that have functioning regulatory systems, a rigorous scientific review is conducted by these agencies to demonstrate that genetically modified products are as safe as traditionally bred, non-biotech/GMO counterparts for food, feed and the environment.
Regulation of Crop Protection Products
Globally, manufacturers of crop protection products, including herbicides, fungicides and insecticides are required to submit an application/dossier and obtain government regulatory approval prior to selling products in a particular country. In the United States, the EPA is responsible for registering and overseeing the approval and marketing of pesticides, pursuant to the FIFRA, the FFDCA and the Food Quality Protection Act. Also, the USDA and the FDA monitor levels of pesticide residue that is allowed on or in crops. Already registered pesticides are required to be re-registered every 15 years to ensure that those products continue to meet the rigorous safety standards set by the regulators. The EPA reevaluates pesticide tolerances every 10 years, taking into account ecological and human health risks, in addition to cumulative risks as a result of multiple routes of and sources of exposure.
Other jurisdictions also have rigorous approval processes, procedures and scientific testing requirements for the approval of crop protection products. We continue to follow legislative and regulatory developments related to
141
pollution and other environmental health and safety matters. Our European operations are subject to the European chemical regulation REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals) and the CLP (Classification, Labeling, and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures).
Environmental and Other Legal Proceedings
Allocation of Contingencies under the Separation Agreement
Under the separation agreement, certain environmental and legal liabilities will be allocated among us, Dow and New DuPont as set forth below.
|
Liabilities primarily related to our business and operations will be retained or assumed by us, unless otherwise specifically allocated to Dow or New DuPont. |
|
Generally, liabilities associated with discontinued and/or divested operations and businesses of: |
|
Historical Dow will be retained or assumed by Dow. |
|
Historical DuPont will be retained or assumed by us and New DuPont as set forth below. |
|
Liabilities clearly related to our or New DuPonts businesses and operations will be allocated to us and New DuPont, respectively. As a result of Historical DuPonts accrued environmental liabilities at June 30, 2018, we expect approximately $25 million to be allocated to Corteva and approximately $50 million to be allocated to New DuPont. The upper end of such liabilities is expected to be approximately $80 million for Corteva and approximately $220 million for New DuPont, of which the excess over $25 million and $50 million, respectively, is not accrued at June 30, 2018. |
|
Liabilities which are not clearly related to our or New DuPonts businesses and operations (i.e., a stray) will be assumed by us or New DuPont up to an amount for each liability to be determined, to the extent such liability is known. As a result of Historical DuPonts accrued environmental liabilities at June 30, 2018, we expect approximately $350 million to be allocated to Corteva and none to be allocated to New DuPont. The upper end of such liabilities is expected to be approximately $985 million, of which the excess over $350 million is not accrued at June 30, 2018. A portion of those amounts are expected to constitute the amount to be determined referenced in the first sentence of this bullet. These figures include Historical DuPont accrued environmental liabilities at June 30, 2018 of approximately $236 million, which are expected to have an upper end of approximately $655 million (the excess of which over $236 million is not accrued at June 30, 2018), for which Historical DuPont is indemnified by Chemours. |
|
Stray liabilities more than the to be determined amount referenced in the first sentence of the preceding bullet and any unknown stray liabilities will be borne by us and/or New DuPont up to separate aggregate thresholds of approximately $200 million to the extent we or New DuPont, as applicable, incur a loss. Once the thresholds are exhausted by both us and New DuPont, liabilities more than those amounts will be shared by us and New DuPont according to a to-be determined fixed percentage, subject to a de minimis amount. We have not yet finalized these percentages. These percentages will be provided in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part. Stray liabilities of Historical DuPont more than the to be determined amount are likely to be incurred by Corteva since EID (the parent company of Historical DuPont) will be a subsidiary of Corteva. |
For more information, see the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the DistributionSeparation Agreement.
These liability allocations will be implemented through transfer or substitution, if possible, or indemnity.
We believe that it is remote that the following matters will have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity, or result of operations.
142
La Porte Plant, La Porte, TexasEPA Multimedia Inspection
The EPA conducted a multimedia inspection at the La Porte facility in January 2008. Historical DuPont, the EPA and the Department of Justice (DOJ) began discussions in the third quarter of 2011 relating to the management of certain materials in the facilitys waste water treatment system, hazardous waste management, flare and air emissions. These discussions, which include possible resolutory actions, continue.
Sabine Plant, Orange, TexasEPA Multimedia Inspection
In June 2012, Historical DuPont began discussions with the EPA and the DOJ related to multimedia inspections that the EPA conducted at the Sabine facility in March 2009 and December 2015. The discussions involve the management of materials in the facilitys waste water treatment system, hazardous waste management, flare and air emissions, including leak detection and repair. These discussions, which include possible resolutory actions, continue.
Environmental Operating Costs and Remediation Costs
As a result of our operations, including past operations and those related to divested businesses and discontinued operations, we incur environmental operating costs for pollution abatement activities including waste collection and disposal, installation and maintenance of air pollution controls and wastewater treatment, emissions testing and monitoring and obtaining permits. We also incur environmental operating costs related to environmental related research and development activities including environmental field and treatment studies as well as toxicity and degradation testing to evaluate the environmental impact of products and raw materials. In addition, we maintain and periodically review and adjust our accruals for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs.
We expect to continue to incur environmental operating costs since we will operate global manufacturing, product handling and distribution facilities that are subject to a broad array of environmental laws and regulations. These rules are subject to change by the implementing governmental agency, which we monitor closely. Our policy will require that our operations fully meet or exceed legal and regulatory requirements. In addition, we expect to continue certain voluntary programs, and could consider additional voluntary actions, to reduce air emissions, minimize the generation of hazardous waste, decrease the volume of water use and discharges, increase the efficiency of energy use and reduce the generation of persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic materials. Costs to comply with complex environmental laws and regulations, as well as internal voluntary programs and goals, are significant and we expect these costs will continue to be significant for the foreseeable future. However, we do not expect these costs to have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations in the foreseeable future, although over the longer term such expenditures are subject to considerable uncertainty and could fluctuate significantly.
We accrue for environmental matters when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. As remediation activities vary substantially in duration and cost from site to site, it is difficult to develop precise estimates of future site remediation costs. We expect to base such estimates on several factors, including the complexity of the geology, the nature and extent of contamination, the type of remedy, the outcome of discussions with regulatory agencies and other Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs) at multi-party sites and the number of, and financial viability, of other PRPs.
Litigation
From time to time we are subject to various legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of our current and former business operations. Such legal proceedings may include intellectual property, commercial, product liability, environmental and antitrust lawsuits. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these various proceedings. Although considerable uncertainty exists, our management does not anticipate that the ultimate disposition of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity. However, the ultimate liabilities could be material to our results of operations in the period recognized.
143
Executive Officers Following the Distribution
The following table sets forth information regarding individuals who are expected to serve as our executive officers, including their positions, after the distribution. Additional executive officers will be selected prior to the distribution to serve as executive officers after the distribution, and information concerning those executive officers will be included in an amendment to this information statement. While some of these individuals currently serve as executive officers of DowDuPont, after the distribution, none of our executive officers will be executive officers of New DuPont.
Name and Age |
Position with
|
Current Positions |
Other Business Experience since
|
|||
James C. Collins, Jr., 56 | Chief Executive Officer | Chief Operating Officer for the Agriculture Division of DowDuPont since September 2017 | Historical DuPont: Executive Vice President Agriculture business 2016 to date; Executive Vice President Electronics & Communications, Industrial Biosciences and Performance Materials businesses 2014 to 2016; Senior Vice President Performance Materials and Industrial Biosciences 2013 to 2014; President Industrial Biosciences and Vice President Acquisitions 2011 to 2013; DuPont Crop Protection 1993 to 2011. | |||
Gregory R. Friedman, 51 | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | Head of Finance for the Agriculture Division of DowDuPont and Vice President, DuPont Investor Relations of DowDuPont | Historical DuPont: General Auditor and Chief Ethics & Compliance Leader 2013 to 2014; Chief Financial Officer of DuPont Pioneer from 2011 to 2013. | |||
Cornel Fuerer, 52 | Senior Vice President, General Counsel | Head of Legal for the Agriculture Division of DowDuPont | Historical DuPont: Associate General Counsel 2013 to date; Corporate Secretary 2012 to 2013. |
Board of Directors Following the Distribution and Director Independence
Our board of directors will be composed of members, of whom qualify as independent under the listing standards of the . The members of our board of directors will be selected prior to the distribution, and information concerning those directors will be included in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The composition of the committees of our board of directors will be decided prior to the distribution, and information concerning those committees will be included in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
Audit Committee
The audit committee, which is expected to consist of , and , will assist our board of directors in overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial
144
statements. In addition, the audit committee will be directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accounting firm. will serve as the chairman of the committee. The audit committee will consist exclusively of members of our board of directors who are financially literate, and is considered an audit committee financial expert as defined by the SEC. Our board of directors has determined that and satisfy the independence requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.
People and Compensation Committee
The people and compensation committee, which is expected to consist of , and , will assist our board of directors in discharging its abilities relating to the compensation and benefits of our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers (as defined in the Exchange Act), employees and non-employee directors, in a manner consistent with and in support of our business objectives, competitive practice and all applicable rules and regulations.
Nomination and Governance Committee
The nomination and governance committee, which is expected to consist of , and , will assist our board of directors in discharging its abilities relating to, among other things, provide oversight of nomination and corporate governance matters. Our board of directors has determined that , and satisfy the independence requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act.
Sustainability, Public Policy, Environment, Health and Safety and Innovation Committee
The sustainability, public policy, environment, health and safety and innovation committee, which is expected to consist of , and , will assist our board of directors in discharging its abilities relating to, among other things, corporate citizenship, corporate social responsibility, assessing current aspects of our environment, health and safety and sustainability policies, reviewing our public policy positions and overseeing and assessing all aspects of our science and technology capabilities. We intend that at least one member of the sustainability, public policy, environment, health and safety and innovation committee will have scientific experience.
145
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
We expect that our named executive officers (NEOs) for purposes of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) will be James C. Collins, Jr., who will be our Chief Executive Officer, Gregory R. Friedman, who will be our Chief Financial Officer, and our three other executive officers (who have not yet been identified) who will have received the most compensation from DowDuPont in respect of 2018.
We are currently a subsidiary of DowDuPont, and our compensation committee has not yet been formed. This CD&A discusses certain aspects of DowDuPonts historical compensation programs as generally applied to its NEOs who are Historical DuPont employees, including Mr. Collins and Mr. Friedman and, we expect, some or all the other individuals who eventually will be identified as our remaining NEOs. This CD&A also outlines certain aspects of our anticipated post-distribution compensation structure for our NEOs.
In any event, after the distribution, we will review the compensation for all of our executive officers and determine the appropriate compensation, benefits and perquisites for them,. Accordingly, the compensation, benefits and perquisites provided to them after the distribution will not necessarily be the same as those discussed below.
Oversight Responsibilities For Executive Compensation
Following the Merger, compensation of the executive officers of DowDuPont has been overseen by the DowDuPont compensation committee (or, in the case of DowDuPonts Executive Chairman and its Chief Executive Officer, by the compensation committee and the independent members of the board of directors of DowDuPont). The DowDuPont compensation committee established a Dow compensation subcommittee and DuPont compensation subcommittee and delegated to them certain responsibilities relating to the compensation and benefits provided to executive officers and employees of TDCC and EID, respectively. The board of directors of DowDuPont, its compensation committee and the respective Subcommittees are assisted in the performance of their oversight duties by independent compensation consultants and DowDuPont management.
We expect our compensation committee, with the assistance of an independent compensation consultant, will refer to published compensation surveys and peer group practices in determining appropriate NEO compensation practices.
Program Structure And Alignment With Core Principles
In General
2017 was a unique year in terms of DowDuPont executive compensation, as both TDCC and EID operated as standalone companies prior to the Merger, each with its own executive compensation and benefit programs and practices. Because the distributions of Dow and Corteva were expected within a relatively short period after the closing of the Merger, a decision was made to not develop separate executive compensation programs at the DowDuPont level for 2017. Rather, the executive officers of DowDuPont continue to be employees of, and participants in, the compensation and benefit programs of TDCC and EID, respectively. The only exception to this structure in respect of 2017 was related to a post-merger grant of performance-based restricted units granted to certain senior executives, including stock-based units granted to Mr. Collins in 2017 and cash-based units granted to Mr. Friedman in early 2018 (the Synergy Grant), as more fully described below in Synergy Grant.
In light of the foregoing, this CD&A describes certain compensation programs of EID in place in respect of our NEOs for 2017 as well as the Synergy Grant. By amendment to this information statement, we will amend this CD&A to describe instead the programs that were in place for our NEOs for 2018.
146
We expect our executive compensation program upon the distribution will generally include the same elements as EIDs current executive compensation programs (or TDCCs, as the case may be). Following the distribution, our compensation committee will review all aspects of compensation and may make adjustments that it believes are appropriate in structuring our executive compensation arrangements.
2017 EID Executive Compensation Program
EIDs compensation program is designed and administered around the following core principles:
|
Establish a strong link between pay and performance. |
|
Align executives interests with stockholders interests, particularly over the longer term. |
|
Reinforce business strategies and drive long-term sustained stockholder value. |
The EID executive compensation program delivers value through three primary forms of compensation: base salary, annual incentives, and long-term incentives, together with certain additional employee benefits and limited perquisites. The compensation outcomes under the programs annual and long-term incentives are determined by company performance and, in the case of the Synergy Grant, by the overall performance of DowDuPont.
The following table summarizes EIDs 2017 executive compensation program before the Merger:
Element of Compensation |
Practice |
|
Base Salary (Fixed annual cash compensation) |
Targeted to median of selected peer group or of general industry market data, as applicable | |
Annual Incentives |
Paid in cash based on:* 50% Operating EPS 25% Business Unit Operating Earnings 25% Business Unit Revenue Entire award capped at 200% of target |
|
Long-Term Incentives |
60% Stock Units: Relative Total Shareholder Return 40% Stock Options |
|
Employee Benefits |
Broad-based and executive benefits, including: Defined-Benefit Retirement Plans (if applicable) Supplemental Retirement Plans 401(k) Plan Supplemental Savings Plans Other Retirement Benefits |
|
Limited Perquisites | Reasonable yet competitive, including financial planning |
* |
Following the Merger, Operating EPS was replaced by Operating Net Income, and Business Unit Operating Earnings was replaced by Business Unit EBITDA |
147
Synergy Grant
As noted above, after the Merger, a grant of performance-based restricted units was made to certain senior executive officers to incentivize:
|
Targeted cost synergies of $3 billion on a run-rate basis (DowDuPont is performing above target and has committed to deliver run-rate cost synergies of $3.3 billion) |
|
Timely realization of the distributions of Dow and Corteva |
The parameters of the Synergy Grant for Messrs. Collins and Friedman are outlined below:
Business Performance and Payout Ranges 1,2 | ||||||||||||||||
Metric |
Weighting |
Threshold ($)
(Synergy: 50% Payout Spin: 25% Payout) |
Target ($)
(100% Payout) |
Maximum ($)
(200% Payout) |
||||||||||||
Synergy Capture |
66 | % | 2.94 billion | 3.0 billion | 3.45 billion | |||||||||||
Dow Distribution |
17 | % | 22 months | 19 months | 16 months | |||||||||||
Corteva Distribution |
17 | % | 24 months | 21 months | 18 months |
(1) |
Payouts will be interpolated on a linear basis for performance between, respectively, Threshold and Target performance and Target and Maximum performance. |
(2) |
All dates measured from the Merger closing. |
Given that DowDuPont intends to separate into three separate entities in the near-term, the DowDuPont compensation committee developed this post-Merger grant to further incentivize key DowDuPont executives to meet these Merger-related objectives. However, regardless of when completion of the specified performance measures occurs, no payouts will be made until, at the earliest, twenty-four months after the close of the Merger, to ensure continued alignment with the strategic objectives.
Severance Benefits
To ensure that its executives remained focused on company business during a period of uncertainty, in 2013 EID adopted its Senior Executive Severance Plan (the SESP), in which Mr. Collins presently participates, and its Key Employee Severance Plan (the KESP), in which Mr. Friedman presently participates. We will honor the terms of the SESP and KESP following the distribution. For any benefits to be earned under the SESP or KESP, a change in control must occur and the participants employment must be terminated within two years following the change in control, either by the employer without cause or the executive for good reason (a double trigger).
The Merger constituted a change in control for purposes of the SESP and KESP. Accordingly, if any of our NEOs participating in the SESP or KESP after the distribution is terminated on or before August 31, 2019 either by the employer without cause or by the executive for good reason, the executive will be entitled to the benefits provided under the SESP or KESP, as the case may be, which include:
|
A lump sum cash payment equal to a multiple of the sum of the executives base salary and target annual bonus, 2 in the case of Mr. Collins and 1.5 in the case of Mr. Friedman. |
|
A lump sum cash payment equal to the pro-rated portion of the executives target annual bonus for the year of termination. |
|
Continued health and dental benefits, financial counseling, tax preparation services and outplacement services for a specified period following the date of termination, 24 months in the case of Mr. Collins and 18 months in the case of Mr. Friedman. |
|
Stock options remaining exercisable for their full term to the extent not already applicable. |
148
Covered executives are also entitled to reimbursement of any expenses incurred in enforcing their rights under the SESP or KESP, as the case may be. As adopted by EID effective in December 2015, if any payments or benefits payable to an executive under the SESP (whether under the plan or otherwise) are subject to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, an additional reimbursement payment will be made such that, on a net after-tax basis, the executive would be in the same position as if no such excise tax had been imposed. Under the KESP, any payments subject to the excise tax will be reduced to a level that does not trigger the excise tax if doing so will result in a greater net after-tax benefit to the executive.
The SESP and KESP require a release of claims as a condition to the payment of benefits and include twelve-month non-solicitation provisions and additional non-disparagement and confidentiality provisions, and, in the case of Mr. Collins under the SESP, a twelve-month non-competition obligation.
Equity awards granted pursuant to EIDs equity plans that were outstanding as of the date of the Merger have a double trigger change in control provision whereby the awards will become fully vested upon the holders involuntary termination of employment without cause within 24 months following a change in control (i.e., on or before August 31, 2019).
2018 Compensation Decisions
This section will be populated, in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, to provide information regarding the compensation of our NEOs for 2018
Treatment Of Outstanding Equity Awards As Of The Distribution Date
This section will be populated, in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, to provide information regarding the treatment of outstanding equity awards.
The Corteva Equity And Incentive Plan
We intend to adopt an equity incentive plan (the EIP). The EIP will become effective as of the distribution date, subject to the occurrence of the distribution. This section will be populated, in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, to provide information regarding the terms of the EIP.
149
The following tables will be populated, in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, to provide information regarding the compensation received by our NEOs from DowDuPont for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three other of our most highly compensated executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 based on compensation received from DowDuPont.
Name and
|
Year |
Salary
($) |
Bonus
($) |
Stock
Awards ($ ) |
Option
Awards ($) |
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation ($) |
Change in
Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) |
All Other
Compensation ($) |
Total
($) |
Total
without Certain Merger Related Items ($) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides additional information about plan-based compensation disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018. This table includes both equity and non-equity awards.
Name |
Grant
Date |
Date of Action
by the Compensation Committee |
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards |
All
Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
All Other
Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) |
Exercise
or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) |
Grant
Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Threshold
($) |
Target
($) |
Maximum
($) |
Threshold
(#) |
Target
(#) |
Maximum
(#) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding Equity Awards
The following table lists outstanding equity grants for each NEO as of December 31, 2018. The table includes outstanding equity grants from past years as well as the current year.
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table summarizes the value received from stock option exercises in 2018 and stock grants vested during 2018.
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||
Name |
Grant
Date |
Number of
Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable |
Number of
Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable |
Option
Exercise Price ($) |
Option
Expiration Date |
Number of
Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) |
Market
Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) |
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) |
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
150
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||
Name |
Number of
Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value
Realized on Exercise ($) |
Number of
Shares Acquired on Vesting (#) |
Value
Realized on Vesting ($) |
||||||||||||
Pension Benefits
The following table lists the pension program participation and actuarial present value of each NEOs defined benefit pension as of December 31, 2018.
Name |
Plan Name |
Number of Years
Credited Service (#) |
Present Value of
Accumulated Benefit ($) |
Payments During Last
Fiscal Year ($) |
||||||||||||
Non-qualified Deferred Compensation
The following table provides information on nonqualified deferred compensation of the NEOs during 2018.
Name |
Executive
Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) (a) |
Company
Contributions in Last Fiscal Year ($) (b) |
Aggregate
Earnings in Last Fiscal Year ($) |
Aggregate
Withdrawals / Distributions ($) |
Aggregate Balance
at Last Fiscal Year-End ($) |
|||||||||||||||
(a) |
Executive contributions are included for 2018 in the Summary Compensation Table. |
(b) |
Company contributions are included in All Other Compensation for 2018 in the Summary Compensation Table. |
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
For a description of severance benefits presently maintained by EID in respect of the NEOs, which we will assume upon our distribution, see Program Structure And Alignment With Core PrinciplesSeverance Benefits above. We expect that we will maintain additional severance programs for our employees, including the NEOs, but we have not yet determined what those will be.
151
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS
We intend to enter into a new related party transaction policy. This section will be populated, in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, to provide information regarding our review and approval of transactions with related persons and restrictions on certain types of transactions.
152
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Before the distribution, all the outstanding shares of Corteva common stock will be owned beneficially and of record by DowDuPont. The following table sets forth information with respect to the expected beneficial ownership of Corteva common stock by: (1) each person who is known by us who will beneficially own more than five percent of Corteva common stock, (2) each expected director, director nominee and NEOs and (3) all our expected directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group. Except as noted below, we based the share amounts on each persons beneficial ownership of DowDuPont common stock on , 2019, giving effect to a distribution ratio of shares of Corteva common stock for every share of DowDuPont common stock. Immediately following the distribution, we estimate that million of our shares of common stock will be issued and outstanding based on DowDuPont common stock expected to be outstanding as of the record date. The actual number of our outstanding shares of Corteva common stock following the distribution will be determined on , 2019, the record date.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
Based solely on the information filed on Schedule 13G for the quarter ended , 2019, reporting beneficial ownership of DowDuPont common stock, we anticipate the following stockholders will beneficially own more than five percent of Corteva common stock following the distribution.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
Number of Shares of
DowDuPont Common Stock |
Number of Shares of
Corteva common stock |
Percent of Shares
Outstanding |
|||||||||
Security Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
The following table provides information regarding beneficial ownership of our NEOs, our expected directors, director nominees and all our expected directors, director nominees and executive officers as a group.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
Number of Shares of
DowDuPont Common Stock |
Number of Shares of
Corteva common stock |
Percent of Shares
Outstanding |
|||||||||
* |
Less than one percent |
153
OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH NEW DUPONT AND DOW FOLLOWING THE DISTRIBUTION
In connection with the intended separation of DowDuPont into three, independent, publicly traded companies, we, DowDuPont (which will, after the separation of Corteva, become New DuPont) and Dow will enter into certain agreements that will effect the separation of DowDuPonts agriculture, materials science and specialty products businesses, including by providing for the allocation between us, Dow and New DuPont of DowDuPonts assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including its investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities), and provide a framework for our relationship following the distribution with New DuPont and Dow. The following is a summary of the material terms of certain of these agreements.
The terms of the agreements described below that will be in effect following the separation of Dow have not yet been finalized; changes to these agreements, some of which may be material, may be made prior to Dows separation from DowDuPont. Following the separation and distribution of Dow, however, no changes to such agreements may be made without Dows consent.
Separation Agreement
Prior to the distribution of Dow, we intend to enter into the separation agreement with DowDuPont and Dow. The separation agreement will set forth our agreement with DowDuPont and Dow regarding the principal actions to be taken in connection with the separation, including those related to the Internal Reorganization and Business Realignment.
Among other things, the separation agreement will allocate liabilities related to or arising out of businesses and operations of Historical Dow and Historical DuPont that were previously discontinued or divested.
Liabilities related to or arising out of businesses and operations of Historical Dow that were previously discontinued or divested will be allocated to Dow.
Liabilities related to businesses of Historical DuPont that were previously discontinued or divested will be allocated between us and New DuPont as set forth on the schedules to the separation agreement (with each of us and New DuPont retaining or assuming our and its applicable allocated liabilities) and if not set forth on the schedule, such liabilities primarily related to our business and operations will be retained or assumed by us and such liabilities primarily related to New DuPonts business and operations will be retained or assumed by New DuPont. To the extent a liability related to or arising out of businesses of Historical DuPont that were previously discontinued or divested is not set forth on a schedule to the separation agreement or is in excess of a to-be-determined amount set forth therein and is not primarily related to our or New DuPonts business and operations, such liability will be allocated to whichever of us or New DuPont (or our respective subsidiaries) incurs or incurred the liability up to $200 million in the aggregate for each company. In the event such liabilities exceed such amount for either us or New DuPont, the excess liability will be allocated to the other, subject to the aggregate cap. In the event such liabilities exceed $200 million in the aggregate for each of us and New DuPont, we or one of our subsidiaries will retain or assume a to-be-determined specified percentage, and New DuPont or one of its subsidiaries will retain or assume a to-be-determined specified percentage, of such excess (subject to a de minimis threshold). We have not yet finalized these percentages. These percentages will be provided in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part.
It will also set forth other agreements that govern certain aspects of our relationship with New DuPont and Dow following the separation and distribution. We have not yet finalized all of the terms of this agreement, and we intend to include additional details on the terms of the agreement in an amendment to the Form 10.
Tax Matters Agreement
We intend to enter into a tax matters agreement with DowDuPont and Dow immediately prior to the distribution of Dow that will govern the parties respective rights, responsibilities and obligations with respect to tax
154
liabilities and benefits, tax attributes, the preparation and filing of tax returns, the control of audits and other tax proceedings and other matters regarding taxes. We have not yet finalized all of the terms of this agreement, and we intend to include additional details on the terms of the agreement in an amendment to the Form 10.
Employee Matters Agreement
We intend to enter into an employee matters agreement with DowDuPont and Dow prior to the distribution of Dow that will set forth our agreements as to certain employment, compensation and benefits matters. We have not yet finalized all of the terms of this agreement, and we intend to include additional details on the terms of the agreement in an amendment to the Form 10.
Intellectual Property Cross-License Agreements
We, Dow and New DuPont intend to enter into intellectual property cross-license agreements with each other, pursuant to which the parties will license to each other certain patents, know-how and technical information owned by the party or its affiliates and necessary or useful in the other partys business. We have not yet finalized all of the terms of these agreements, and we intend to include additional details on the terms of the agreements in an amendment to the Form 10.
Other Agreements
We, New DuPont and Dow also intend to enter into certain other agreements with each other, including those identified below. We have not yet finalized all of the terms of these agreements, and we intend to include additional details on the terms of the agreements in an amendment to the Form 10.
|
Trademark License Agreements; |
|
Regulatory License Agreement; |
|
MOD 5 Computerized Process Control Software Agreements; |
|
Operating Systems and Tools License Agreement; |
|
Umbrella Secrecy Agreement; |
|
General Services Agreement; |
|
Site Services Agreements; |
|
Ground Leases; and |
|
Manufacturing and Supply Agreements. |
155
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISTRIBUTION
The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences to DowDuPont and DowDuPont stockholders in connection with the distribution. This summary is based on the Code, the Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, and judicial and administrative interpretations thereof, all as in effect as of the date of this information statement and all of which are subject to differing interpretations and may change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect. Any such change could affect the tax consequences described below. This summary assumes that the separation will be consummated in accordance with the separation agreement and as described in this information statement.
Except as specifically described below, this summary is limited to DowDuPont stockholders that are U.S. Holders, as defined immediately below. For purposes of this summary, a U.S. Holder is a beneficial owner of DowDuPont common stock that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
an individual who is a citizen or a resident of the U.S.; |
|
a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes, created or organized under the laws of the U.S. or any state thereof or the District of Columbia; |
|
an estate, the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or |
|
a trust, if (1) a court within the U.S. is able to exercise primary jurisdiction over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all its substantial decisions, or (2) in the case of a trust that was treated as a domestic trust under the law in effect before 1997, a valid election is in place under applicable Treasury Regulations. |
This summary also does not discuss all tax considerations that may be relevant to DowDuPont stockholders in light of their particular circumstances, nor does it address the consequences to DowDuPont stockholders subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws, such as:
|
dealers or traders in securities or currencies; |
|
tax-exempt entities; |
|
cooperatives; |
|
banks, trusts, financial institutions, or insurance companies; |
|
persons who acquired shares of DowDuPont common stock pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation; |
|
stockholders who own, or are deemed to own, at least 10 percent or more, by voting power or value, of DowDuPonts equity; |
|
holders owning DowDuPont common stock as part of a position in a straddle or as part of a hedging, conversion, constructive sale, synthetic security, integrated investment, or other risk reduction transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes; |
|
certain former citizens or former long-term residents of the U.S.; |
|
holders who are subject to the alternative minimum tax; or |
|
persons that own DowDuPont common stock through partnerships or other pass-through entities. |
This summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to stockholders who do not hold shares of DowDuPont common stock as a capital asset. Moreover, this summary does not address any state, local, or foreign tax consequences or any estate, gift or other non-income tax consequences.
If a partnership (or any other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds shares of DowDuPont common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in that partnership generally will depend on the status
156
of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Such a partner or partnership should consult its own tax advisor as to the tax consequences of the distribution.
YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR OWN TAX ADVISOR WITH RESPECT TO THE SPECIFIC U.S. FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL, AND NON-U.S. TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE DISTRIBUTION IN LIGHT OF YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE EFFECT OF POSSIBLE CHANGES IN LAW THAT MIGHT AFFECT THE TAX CONSEQUENCES DESCRIBED IN THIS INFORMATION STATEMENT.
Treatment of the Distribution
It is a condition to the distribution that DowDuPont receives the Tax Opinion, in form and substance acceptable to DowDuPont, substantially to the effect, among other things, that the distribution and certain related transactions will qualify as a tax-free transaction under Section 368(a)(1)(D) and Section 355 of the Code.
Assuming the distribution qualifies as tax-free under Section 368(a)(1)(D) and Section 355 of the Code, for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
|
no gain or loss will be recognized by DowDuPont as a result of the distribution; |
|
no gain or loss will be recognized by, or be includible in the income of, a DowDuPont stockholder solely as a result of the receipt of Corteva common stock in the distribution; |
|
the aggregate tax basis of the shares of DowDuPont common stock and shares of Corteva common stock in the hands of each DowDuPont stockholder immediately after the distribution (including any fractional shares deemed received, as discussed below) will be the same as the aggregate tax basis of the shares of DowDuPont common stock held by such holder immediately before the distribution, allocated between the shares of DowDuPont common stock and shares of Corteva common stock (including any fractional shares deemed received) in proportion to their relative fair market values immediately following the distribution; and |
|
the holding period with respect to shares of Corteva common stock received by DowDuPont stockholders (including any fractional shares deemed received) will include the holding period of their shares of DowDuPont common stock. |
DowDuPont stockholders that have acquired different blocks of DowDuPont common stock at different times or at different prices should consult their tax advisors regarding the allocation of their aggregate adjusted basis among, and their holding period of, our shares distributed with respect to blocks of DowDuPont common stock.
The Tax Opinion will be based on, among other things, certain assumptions as well as on the accuracy of certain factual representations and statements that we and DowDuPont make. In rendering the Tax Opinion, Skadden also will rely on certain covenants that we and DowDuPont enter into, including the adherence by New DuPont and us to certain restrictions on their and our future actions. The Tax Opinion will be expressed as of the date of the distribution and will not cover subsequent periods. As a result, the Tax Opinion is not expected to be issued until after the date of this information statement. Additionally, the Tax Opinion will rely on the IRS Ruling regarding the proper time, manner and methodology for measuring common ownership in the stock of DowDuPont, Historical DuPont and Historical Dow for purposes of determining whether there has been a 50 percent or greater change of ownership under Section 355(e) of the Code, described further below, as a result of the Merger, as well as certain factual representations from DowDuPont as to the extent of common ownership in the stock of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow immediately prior to the Merger. Based on the representations made by DowDuPont as to the common ownership in the stock of Historical DuPont and Historical Dow immediately prior to the Merger and assuming the continued validity of the IRS Ruling, the Tax Opinion will conclude that there was not a 50 percent or greater change of ownership in DowDuPont, Historical DuPont or Historical Dow for purposes of Section 355(e) as a result of the Merger. If any of the facts,
157
representations, assumptions, or undertakings described or made in connection with the IRS Ruling or the Tax Opinion are not correct, are incomplete or have been violated, the IRS Ruling could be revoked retroactively or modified by the IRS, and the ability to rely on the Tax Opinion could be jeopardized. We are not aware of any facts or circumstances, however, that would cause these facts, representations, or assumptions to be untrue or incomplete, or that would cause any of these undertakings to fail to be complied with, in any material respect.
An opinion of counsel represents counsels best judgment based on current law and is not binding on the IRS or any court. We cannot assure you that the IRS will agree with the conclusions expected to be set forth in the Tax Opinion, and it is possible that the IRS or another tax authority could adopt a position contrary to one or all those conclusions and that a court could sustain that contrary position. You should note that, other than the IRS Ruling previously mentioned, DowDuPont does not intend to seek a ruling from the IRS as to the U.S. federal income tax treatment of the distribution or related transactions. The Tax Opinion is not binding on the IRS or a court, and there can be no assurance that the IRS will not challenge the validity of the distribution and related transactions as a reorganization for U.S. federal income tax purposes under Section 368(a)(1)(D) and Section 355 of the Code or that any such challenge ultimately will not prevail.
If, notwithstanding the conclusions in the IRS Ruling and those that we expect to be included in the Tax Opinion, it is ultimately determined that the distribution does not qualify as tax-free under Section 355 of the Code for U.S. federal income tax purposes, then DowDuPont would recognize corporate level taxable gain on the distribution in an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the fair market value of Corteva common stock distributed to DowDuPont stockholders on the distribution date over DowDuPonts tax basis in such stock. In addition, if the distribution is ultimately determined not to qualify as tax-free under Section 355 of the Code for U.S. federal income tax purposes, each DowDuPont stockholder that receives shares of Corteva common stock in the distribution would be treated as receiving a distribution in an amount equal to the fair market value of Corteva common stock that was distributed to the stockholder, which generally would be taxed as a dividend to the extent of the stockholders pro rata share of DowDuPonts current and accumulated earnings and profits, including DowDuPonts taxable gain, if any, on the distribution, then treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the stockholders basis in DowDuPont stock and thereafter treated as capital gain from the sale or exchange of DowDuPont stock.
Even if the distribution otherwise qualifies for tax-free treatment under Section 355 of the Code, the distribution may result in corporate level taxable gain to DowDuPont under Section 355(e) of the Code if either we or DowDuPont undergoes a 50 percent or greater ownership change as part of a plan or series of related transactions that includes the distribution, potentially including transactions occurring after the distribution. The process for determining whether one or more acquisitions or issuances triggering this provision has occurred, the extent to which any such acquisitions or issuances results in a change of ownership and the cumulative effect of any such acquisitions or issuances together with any prior acquisitions or issuances (including the Merger) is complex, inherently factual and subject to interpretation of the facts and circumstances of a particular case. If an acquisition or issuance of stock triggers the application of Section 355(e) of the Code, DowDuPont would recognize taxable gain as described above, but the distribution would be tax-free to each DowDuPont stockholder (except for tax on any cash received in lieu of fractional shares). In certain cases, we may be required to indemnify DowDuPont for all or part of the tax liability resulting from the application of Section 355(e). For further details regarding our potential indemnity obligation, see the section entitled Our Relationship with New DuPont and Dow Following the DistributionTax Matters Agreement.
A U.S. Holder that receives cash instead of fractional shares of Corteva common stock should be treated as though the U.S. Holder first received a distribution of a fractional share of Corteva common stock, and then sold it for the amount of cash. Such U.S. Holder should recognize capital gain or loss, measured by the difference between the cash received for such fractional share and the U.S. Holders basis in the fractional share, as determined above. Such capital gain or loss should generally be a long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holders holding period for such U.S. Holders DowDuPont common stock exceeds one year.
158
U.S. Treasury Regulations require certain stockholders that receive stock in a distribution to attach a detailed statement setting forth certain information relating to the distribution to their respective U.S. federal income tax returns for the year in which the distribution occurs. Within 45 days after the distribution, DowDuPont will provide stockholders who receive Corteva common stock in the distribution with the information necessary to comply with such requirement. In addition, all stockholders are required to retain permanent records relating to the amount, basis, and fair market value of Corteva common stock received in the distribution and to make those records available to the IRS upon request of the IRS.
159
DESCRIPTION OF OUR CAPITAL STOCK
This section will be populated, in an amendment to the Form 10 of which this information statement forms a part, to provide information in regard to the material terms of our capital stock that will be contained in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and by-laws.
161
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed the Form 10 with the SEC with respect to the shares of Corteva common stock being distributed as contemplated by this information statement. This information statement is a part of, and does not contain all of the information set forth in, the registration statement and the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement. For further information with respect to us and Corteva common stock, please refer to the registration statement, including its exhibits and schedules. Statements made in this information statement relating to any contract or other document are not necessarily complete, and you should refer to the exhibits attached to the registration statement for copies of the actual contract or document. You may review a copy of the registration statement, including its exhibits and schedules, at the SECs public reference room, located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 as well as on the Internet website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov. Information contained on any website referenced in this information statement is not incorporated by reference in this information statement.
As a result of the distribution, we will become subject to the information and reporting requirements of the Exchange Act and, in accordance with the Exchange Act, we will file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC, which will be available on the Internet website maintained by the SEC at www.sec.gov.
Unless we have received contrary instructions, if multiple DowDuPont stockholders share an address, only one copy of this information statement is being delivered to such address. This practice, known as householding, is designed to reduce printing and postage costs.
We undertake to deliver promptly upon written or oral request a separate copy of this information statement to DowDuPont stockholders at a shared address to which a single copy of this information statement was delivered. If you are a registered DowDuPont stockholder, you may request such separate copy by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary at 974 Centre Road, Wilmington DE, 19805. If you hold your stock with a bank or broker, you may request such separate copy by contacting or by calling . If you are a registered DowDuPont stockholder receiving multiple copies at the same address or if you have a number of accounts at a single brokerage firm, you may submit a request to receive a single copy in the future by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary. If you hold your stock with a bank or broker, contact at the address and telephone number provided above.
We intend to furnish holders of Corteva common stock with annual reports containing consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and audited and reported on, with an opinion expressed, by an independent registered public accounting firm.
You should rely only on the information contained in this information statement or to which we have referred you. We have not authorized any person to provide you with different information or to make any representation not contained in this information statement.
162
CORTEVA INC.
Corteva, Inc. (the Corporation) is a wholly owned subsidiary of DowDuPont and was formed on March 16, 2018 to serve as a holding company for Corteva. The Corporation has engaged in no business operations to date and has no assets or liabilities of any kind, other than those incident to its formation.
F-1
Exhibit 99.2
Managements Reports on Responsibility for Financial Statements and
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Managements Report on Responsibility for Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the Consolidated Financial Statements and the other financial information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) and are considered by management to present fairly the companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The financial statements include some amounts that are based on managements best estimates and judgments. The financial statements have been audited by the companys independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. The purpose of their audit is to express an opinion as to whether the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K present fairly, in all material respects, the companys financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with GAAP. Their reports are presented on the following pages.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. The companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
i. |
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; |
ii. |
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of the company; and |
iii. |
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisitions, use or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Internal control over financial reporting has certain inherent limitations which may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, changes in conditions and business practices may cause variation in the effectiveness of internal controls.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) . Based on its assessment and those criteria, management concluded that the company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017.
The company completed its acquisition of the Health and Nutrition Business (the H&N Business) from FMC Corporation on November 1, 2017. As a result, management has excluded this business from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. The total assets of the H&N Business that were excluded from the assessment represented less two percent of the companys total assets as of December 31, 2017. The total net sales of the H&N Business that were excluded from the assessment represented less than two percent of the companys total revenues for the period September 1 to December 31, 2017.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, as stated in their reports, which are presented on the following pages.
/s/ Edward D. Breen | /s/ Nicholas C. Fanandakis | |||
Edward D. Breen Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Nicholas C. Fanandakis Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
February 15, 2018
F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and its subsidiaries (Successor) (the Company) as of December 31, 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for the period September 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, including the related notes and financial statement schedule appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). We also have audited the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the period September 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Companys management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing on page F-2. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Companys consolidated financial statements and on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.
1
As described in Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, management has excluded the H&N Business from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 because it was acquired by the Company in a purchase business combination during 2017. We have also excluded the H&N Business from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. The H&N Business is a wholly-owned subsidiary whose total assets and total revenues excluded from managements assessment and our audit of internal control over financial reporting represent less than two percent each of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of December 31, 2017 and for the period September 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017.
2
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 15, 2018
We have served as the Companys auditor since 1954.
3
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company:
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company and its subsidiaries (Predecessor) as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for the period January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016, including the related notes and financial statement schedule appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the period January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017, and for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 15, 2018
We have served as the Companys auditor since 1954.
4
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
For the
Period September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the
Period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 7,053 | $ | 17,281 | $ | 23,209 | $ | 23,657 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
6,165 | 10,205 | 13,955 | 14,591 | ||||||||||||
Other operating charges |
504 | 667 | 434 | |||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
473 | 1,064 | 1,502 | 1,735 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
1,101 | 3,306 | 4,143 | 4,428 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
389 | |||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset related chargesnet |
180 | 323 | 556 | 795 | ||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
314 | |||||||||||||||
Sundry incomenet |
90 | 166 | 707 | 690 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
107 | 254 | 370 | 342 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
(1,586 | ) | 1,791 | 2,723 | 2,022 | |||||||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
(2,673 | ) | 149 | 641 | 575 | |||||||||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes |
1,087 | 1,642 | 2,082 | 1,447 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations after income taxes |
(77 | ) | 119 | 443 | 512 | |||||||||||
Net income |
1,010 | 1,761 | 2,525 | 1,959 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
| 20 | 12 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to DuPont |
$ | 1,010 | $ | 1,741 | $ | 2,513 | $ | 1,953 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock from continuing operations |
$ | 1.86 | $ | 2.36 | $ | 1.60 | ||||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock from discontinued operations |
0.13 | 0.51 | 0.57 | |||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock |
$ | 2.00 | $ | 2.87 | $ | 2.17 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock from continuing operations |
$ | 1.85 | $ | 2.35 | $ | 1.59 | ||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock from discontinued operations |
0.13 | 0.50 | 0.57 | |||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock |
$ | 1.99 | $ | 2.85 | $ | 2.16 | ||||||||||
Dividends declared per share of common stock |
$ | 1.14 | $ | 1.52 | $ | 1.72 |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 11.
5
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the
Period September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the
Period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,010 | $ | 1,761 | $ | 2,525 | $ | 1,959 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) incomenet of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains on investments |
| | 20 | (19 | ) | |||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
(454 | ) | 1,042 | (510 | ) | (1,605 | ) | |||||||||
Adjustments to pension benefit plans |
128 | 247 | 323 | 574 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to other benefit plans |
(53 | ) | 10 | (379 | ) | (240 | ) | |||||||||
Derivative instruments |
(2 | ) | (10 | ) | 31 | (18 | ) | |||||||||
Total other comprehensive (loss) income |
(381 | ) | 1,289 | (515 | ) | (1,308 | ) | |||||||||
Comprehensive income |
629 | 3,050 | 2,010 | 651 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interestsnet of tax |
| 20 | 12 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to DuPont |
$ | 629 | $ | 3,030 | $ | 1,998 | $ | 645 |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 11.
6
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||
(In millions, except share amounts) |
December 31,
2017 |
December 31,
2016 |
||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 7,250 | $ | 4,548 | ||||
Marketable securities |
952 | 1,362 | ||||||
Accounts and notes receivablenet |
5,239 | 4,959 | ||||||
Inventories |
8,633 | 5,350 | ||||||
Other current assets |
981 | 505 | ||||||
Assets held for salecurrent |
| 789 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
23,055 | 17,513 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates |
1,595 | 649 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
12,878 | 23,015 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
443 | 14,164 | ||||||
Net property, plant and equipment |
12,435 | 8,851 | ||||||
Goodwill |
45,589 | 4,169 | ||||||
Other intangible assets |
27,726 | 3,664 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
480 | 3,308 | ||||||
Other assets |
2,084 | 1,810 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Assets |
$ | 112,964 | $ | 39,964 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and Equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations |
$ | 2,779 | $ | 429 | ||||
Accounts payable |
4,831 | 3,678 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
149 | 101 | ||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
4,384 | 4,650 | ||||||
Liabilities held for salecurrent |
| 74 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
12,143 | 8,932 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-Term Debt |
10,291 | 8,107 | ||||||
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
5,836 | 425 | ||||||
Pension and other post employment benefitsnoncurrent |
7,787 | |||||||
Other noncurrent obligations |
1,975 | 12,304 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
25,889 | 20,836 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingent liabilities |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock, without par valuecumulative; 23,000,000 shares authorized; issued at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016: |
||||||||
$4.50 Series1,673,000 shares (callable at $120) |
169 | 167 | ||||||
$3.50 Series700,000 shares (callable at $102) |
70 | 70 | ||||||
Common stock, $.30 par value; 1,800,000,000 shares authorized; issued at December 31, 2017100 and December 31, 2016950,044,000 |
| 285 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
74,727 | 11,190 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
175 | 14,924 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(381 | ) | (9,911 | ) | ||||
Common stock held in treasury, at cost (Shares: December 31, 20170; December 31, 201687,041,000) |
| (6,727 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total DuPont stockholders equity |
74,760 | 9,998 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Noncontrolling interests |
172 | 198 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total equity |
74,932 | 10,196 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Liabilities and Equity |
$ | 112,964 | $ | 39,964 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 11.
7
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the
Period September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the
Period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,010 | $ | 1,761 | $ | 2,525 | $ | 1,959 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used for operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
815 | 749 | 1,258 | 1,466 | ||||||||||||
Provision for deferred income tax |
(3,015 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net periodic pension (benefit) cost |
(111 | ) | 295 | 572 | 591 | |||||||||||
Pension contributions |
(68 | ) | (3,024 | ) | (535 | ) | (308 | ) | ||||||||
Net gain on sales of property, businesses, consolidated companies, and investments |
(16 | ) | (204 | ) | (436 | ) | (59 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring and asset related chargesnet |
180 | |||||||||||||||
Asset related charges |
279 | 682 | 147 | |||||||||||||
Amortization of inventory step-up |
1,573 | |||||||||||||||
Other net loss |
125 | 481 | 366 | 106 | ||||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquired and divested companies: |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable |
2,107 | (2,269 | ) | (270 | ) | (448 | ) | |||||||||
Inventories |
(1,010 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Inventories and other operating assets |
(202 | ) | (54 | ) | 164 | |||||||||||
Accounts payable |
934 | |||||||||||||||
Accounts payable and other operating liabilities |
(1,555 | ) | (674 | ) | (1,031 | ) | ||||||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
1,672 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued interest and income taxes |
(260 | ) | (77 | ) | (165 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities |
4,196 | (3,949 | ) | 3,357 | 2,422 | |||||||||||
Investing activities |
||||||||||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(426 | ) | (687 | ) | (1,019 | ) | (1,629 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales of property, businesses, and consolidated companiesnet of cash divested |
1,268 | 300 | 316 | 156 | ||||||||||||
Payment into trust account |
(571 | ) | | | | |||||||||||
Distribution from trust account |
13 | | | | ||||||||||||
Acquisitions of businessesnet of cash acquired |
3 | (246 | ) | | (152 | ) | ||||||||||
Investments in and loans to nonconsolidated affiliates |
(5 | ) | (22 | ) | (19 | ) | (76 | ) | ||||||||
Purchases of investments |
(1,043 | ) | (5,457 | ) | (2,633 | ) | (1,897 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments |
2,938 | 3,977 | 2,181 | 1,121 | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange contract settlements |
(206 | ) | (385 | ) | 615 | |||||||||||
Other investing activitiesnet |
33 | (41 | ) | 45 | 34 | |||||||||||
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
2,210 | (2,382 | ) | (1,514 | ) | (1,828 | ) |
8
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the
Period September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the
Period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Financing activities |
||||||||||||||||
Change in short-term (less than 90 days) borrowings |
(2,541 | ) | 3,610 | 387 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
499 | 2,734 | 813 | 3,679 | ||||||||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(42 | ) | (229 | ) | (1,440 | ) | (1,537 | ) | ||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
| (916 | ) | (2,353 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
30 | 235 | 154 | 200 | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid to stockholders |
(332 | ) | (666 | ) | (1,335 | ) | (1,546 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions to DowDuPont |
(829 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Cash transferred to Chemours at spin-off |
| | | (250 | ) | |||||||||||
Other financing activities |
(12 | ) | (52 | ) | (48 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||||||
Cash (used for) provided by financing activities |
(3,227 | ) | 5,632 | (2,385 | ) | (1,929 | ) | |||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(22 | ) | 187 | (153 | ) | (275 | ) | |||||||||
Cash reclassified as held for sale |
88 | (31 | ) | 15 | 22 | |||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
3,245 | (543 | ) | (680 | ) | (1,588 | ) | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
4,005 | 4,548 | 5,228 | 6,816 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 7,250 | $ | 4,005 | $ | 4,548 | $ | 5,228 | ||||||||
Supplemental cash flow information |
||||||||||||||||
Cash paid (received) during the period for |
||||||||||||||||
Interest, net of amounts capitalized |
$ | 76 | $ | 331 | $ | 386 | $ | 341 | ||||||||
Income taxes |
(437 | ) | 272 | 735 | 885 |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 11.
9
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Financial Statements
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
(In millions) |
Preferred
Stock |
Common
Stock |
Additional
Paid-in Capital |
Retained
Earnings |
Accumulated
Other Comp Loss |
Treasury
Stock |
Non-controlling
Interests |
Total
Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Predecessor |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2015 |
$ | 237 | $ | 298 | $ | 11,174 | $ | 16,894 | $ | (8,556 | ) | (6,727 | ) | 58 | $ | 13,378 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
1,953 | 6 | 1,959 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
(1,308 | ) | (1,308 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common dividends ($1.72 per share) |
(1,542 | ) | (4 | ) | (1,546 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends |
(10 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued-compensation plans |
2 | 359 | 361 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock repurchased |
(2,353 | ) | (2,353 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock retired |
(12 | ) | (451 | ) | (1,890 | ) | 2,353 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Spin-off of Chemours |
(895 | ) | 468 | (4 | ) | (431 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consolidation of a joint venture |
(1 | ) | 151 | 150 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2015 |
$ | 237 | $ | 288 | $ | 11,081 | $ | 14,510 | $ | (9,396 | ) | $ | (6,727 | ) | $ | 207 | $ | 10,200 | ||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 |
$ | 237 | $ | 288 | $ | 11,081 | $ | 14,510 | $ | (9,396 | ) | (6,727 | ) | 207 | $ | 10,200 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
2,513 | 12 | 2,525 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
(515 | ) | (515 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common dividends ($1.52 per share) |
(1,331 | ) | (16 | ) | (1,347 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends |
(10 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued-compensation plans |
1 | 267 | 268 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock repurchased |
(916 | ) | (916 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock retired |
(4 | ) | (154 | ) | (758 | ) | 916 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of a majority interest in a consolidated subsidiary |
(4 | ) | (5 | ) | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
$ | 237 | $ | 285 | $ | 11,190 | $ | 14,924 | $ | (9,911 | ) | $ | (6,727 | ) | $ | 198 | $ | 10,196 | ||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2017 |
$ | 237 | $ | 285 | $ | 11,190 | $ | 14,924 | $ | (9,911 | ) | $ | (6,727 | ) | $ | 198 | 10,196 | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
1,741 | 20 | 1,761 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
1,289 | 1,289 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common dividends ($1.14 per share) |
(991 | ) | (4 | ) | (995 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends |
(7 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock issued-compensation plans |
2 | 273 | 275 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock retired |
(26 | ) | (1,044 | ) | (5,657 | ) | 6,727 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of majority interest in consolidated subsidiary |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at August 31, 2017 |
$ | 237 | $ | 261 | $ | 10,419 | $ | 10,010 | $ | (8,622 | ) | $ | | $ | 212 | $ | 12,517 | |||||||||||||||
Successor |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 1, 2017 (remeasured upon Merger) |
$ | 239 | $ | | $ | 74,680 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 162 | $ | 75,081 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income |
1,010 | | 1,010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss |
(381 | ) | (381 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends |
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions to DowDuPont |
(829 | ) | (829 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of DowDuPont stock |
30 | 30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
36 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sale of a majority interest in a consolidated subsidiary |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition of a noncontrolling interest in a consolidated subsidiary |
3 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
(19 | ) | (3 | ) | 11 | (11 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
$ | 239 | $ | | $ | 74,727 | $ | 175 | $ | (381 | ) | $ | | $ | 172 | $ | 74,932 |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 11.
10
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Table of Contents
Note | Page | |||||
1 | 12 | |||||
2 | 21 | |||||
3 | 24 | |||||
4 | 31 | |||||
5 | 35 | |||||
6 | 39 | |||||
7 | 41 | |||||
8 | 45 | |||||
9 | 47 | |||||
10 | 47 | |||||
11 | 48 | |||||
12 | 48 | |||||
13 |
Short-Term Borrowings, Long-Term Debt and Available Credit Facilities |
50 | ||||
14 | 52 | |||||
15 | 57 | |||||
16 | 61 | |||||
17 | 74 | |||||
18 | 78 | |||||
19 | 83 | |||||
20 | 85 | |||||
21 | 86 | |||||
22 | 87 |
11
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
NOTE 1SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont or the company) were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The significant accounting policies described below, together with the other notes that follow, are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
DowDuPont Inc. (DowDuPont) was formed on December 9, 2015 to effect an all-stock, merger of equals strategic combination between The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) and DuPont (the Merger Transaction). On August 31, 2017 at 11:59 pm ET, (the Merger Effectiveness Time) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 11, 2015, as amended on March 31, 2017 (the Merger Agreement), Dow and DuPont each merged with wholly owned subsidiaries of DowDuPont (Mergers) and, as a result of the Mergers, Dow and DuPont became subsidiaries of DowDuPont (collectively, the Merger). Prior to the Merger, DowDuPont did not conduct any business activities other than those required for its formation and matters contemplated by the Merger Agreement. DowDuPont intends to pursue, subject to the receipt of approval by the Board of Directors of DowDuPont, the separation of the combined companys agriculture business, specialty products business and materials science business through a series of tax-efficient transactions (collectively, the Intended Business Separations).
For purposes of DowDuPonts financial statement presentation, Dow was determined to be the accounting acquirer in the Merger and DuPonts assets and liabilities are reflected at fair value as of the Merger Effectiveness Time. In connection with the Merger and the related accounting determination, DuPont has elected to apply push-down accounting and reflect in its financial statements the fair value of its assets and liabilities. DuPonts Consolidated Financial Statements for periods following the close of the Merger are labeled Successor and reflect DowDuPonts basis in the fair values of the assets and liabilities of DuPont. All periods prior to the closing of the Merger reflect the historical accounting basis in DuPonts assets and liabilities and are labeled Predecessor. The Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes include a black line division between the columns titled Predecessor and Successor to signify that the amounts shown for the periods prior to and following the Merger are not comparable. See Note 3 for additional information on the Merger.
Transactions between DowDuPont, DuPont, Dow and their affiliates and other associated companies are reflected in the Successor consolidated financial statements and disclosed as related party transactions when material. Related party transactions with DowDuPont are included in Note 6. Related party transactions with Dow and their affiliates were not material as of December 31, 2017 and for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017.
As a condition of the regulatory approval for the Merger Transaction, the company was required to divest certain assets related to its crop protection business and research and development (R&D) organization, specifically the companys Cereal Broadleaf Herbicides and Chewing Insecticides portfolios, including Rynaxypyr ® , Cyazypyr ® and Indoxacarb as well as the crop protection R&D pipeline and organization, excluding seed treatment, nematicides, and late-stage R&D programs. On March 31, 2017, the company entered into a definitive agreement (the FMC Transaction Agreement) with FMC Corporation (FMC). Under the FMC Transaction Agreement, FMC would acquire the crop protection business and R&D assets that DuPont was required to divest in order to obtain European Commission (EC) approval of the Merger Transaction as described above, (the Divested Ag Business) and DuPont agreed to acquire certain assets relating to FMCs Health and Nutrition segment, excluding its Omega-3 products (the H&N Business) (collectively, the FMC Transactions).
On November 1, 2017, the company completed the FMC Transactions through the disposition of the Divested Ag Business and the acquisition of the H&N Business. The sale of the Divested Ag Business meets the criteria for
12
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
discontinued operations and as such, results of operations are presented as discontinued operations and have been excluded from continuing operations for all periods presented. The sum of the individual earnings per share amounts from continuing operations and discontinued operations may not equal the total company earnings per share amounts due to rounding. The assets and liabilities related to the Divested Ag Business for all periods are presented as assets and liabilities held for sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The comprehensive income and cash flows related to the Divested Ag Business have not been segregated and are included in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, respectively, for all periods presented. Amounts related to the Divested Ag Business are consistently included or excluded from the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements based on the respective financial statement line item. See Note 4 for additional information.
On July 1, 2015, the company completed the separation of its Performance Chemicals segment through the spin-off of all of the issued and outstanding stock of The Chemours Company (Chemours). In accordance with GAAP, the results of operations of the Performance Chemicals segment are presented as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for all periods presented. See Note 4 for additional information.
Certain reclassifications of prior years data have been made to conform to current years presentation. As described in Note 2, effective January 1, 2017, the company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-09, CompensationStock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. In conjunction with the adoption of this ASU, the company retrospectively reclassified cash flows related to income tax impacts associated with employee share-based payments in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, as described in Note 2.
The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the company and subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is maintained. For those consolidated subsidiaries in which the companys ownership is less than 100 percent, the outside stockholders interests are shown as noncontrolling interests. Investments in affiliates over which the company has significant influence but not a controlling interest are accounted for under the equity method.
The company is also involved with certain joint ventures accounted for under the equity method of accounting that are variable interest entities (VIEs). The company is not the primary beneficiary, as the nature of the companys involvement with the VIEs does not provide it the power to direct the VIEs significant activities. Future events may require these VIEs to be consolidated if the company becomes the primary beneficiary. At December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the maximum exposure to loss related to the nonconsolidated VIEs is not considered material to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Use of Estimates in Financial Statement Preparation
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The companys consolidated financial statements include amounts that are based on managements best estimates and judgments. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In connection with the Merger, DowDuPont has performed a preliminary allocation of the total consideration exchanged for the DuPont assets and liabilities it acquired using preliminary estimates. The estimates are subject to change as discussed in Note 3.
13
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Changes in Accounting and Reporting
Within the Successor period, DuPont made the following changes in accounting and reporting to harmonize its accounting and reporting with DowDuPont.
Within the Successor period of the Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
Included royalty income within net sales. In the Predecessor periods, royalty income is included within sundry incomenet. |
|
Eliminated the other operating charges line item. In the Successor period, a majority of these costs are included within cost of goods sold. These costs are also included in selling, general and administrative expenses and amortization of intangibles in the Successor period. |
|
Presented amortization of intangibles as a separate line item. In the Predecessor periods, amortization is included within cost of goods sold, selling, general and administrative expenses, other operating charges, and research and development expenses. |
|
Presented integration and separation costs as a separate line item. In the Predecessor periods, these costs are included within selling, general and administrative expenses. |
|
Included interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within the (benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations. In the Predecessor period, interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits is included within sundry incomenet. |
Within the Successor period of the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
Included loans to nonconsolidated affiliates within other assets. In the Predecessor period, loans are included within investment in nonconsolidated affiliates. |
|
Included accrued discounts and rebates within accounts payable. In the Predecessor period, accrued discounts and rebates are included within accrued and other current liabilities. |
|
Included non-current pension liabilities within pension and other post employment benefitsnoncurrent. In the Predecessor period, non-current pension liabilities are included within other noncurrent obligations. |
Within the Successor period of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
|
Included foreign currency exchange contract settlements within cash flows from operating activities, regardless of hedge accounting qualification. In the Predecessor period, DuPont reflected non-qualified hedge programs, specifically forward contracts, options and cash collateral activity, within cash flows from investing activities. In the Predecessor period, DuPont reflected cash flows from qualified programs within the line item it related to (i.e., revenue hedge cash flows presented within changes from accounts receivable). |
|
Aligned the line items within changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquired and divested companies to the DowDuPont presentation, including accounts and notes receivable, inventories, accounts payable, and other assets and liabilities. In the Predecessor period, the line item changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquired and divested companies includes accounts and notes receivable, inventories and other operating assets, accounts payable and other operating liabilities, and accrued interest and income taxes. |
14
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash equivalents represent investments with maturities of three months or less from time of purchase. They are carried at cost plus accrued interest.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents trust assets of $558 million as of December 31, 2017, and is included within other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 6 and Note 16 for further information.
Marketable Securities
Marketable securities represent investments in fixed and floating rate financial instruments with maturities greater than three months and up to twelve months at time of purchase. Investments classified as held-to-maturity are recorded at amortized cost. The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the investments. Investments classified as available-for-sale are carried at estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The cost of investments sold is determined by specific identification.
Fair Value Measurements
Under the accounting guidance for fair value measurements and disclosures, a fair value hierarchy was established that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). A financial instruments level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The company uses the following valuation techniques to measure fair value for its assets and liabilities:
Level 1 | | Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; | ||
Level 2 | | Significant other observable inputs (e.g. quoted prices for similar items in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar items in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable such as interest rate and yield curves, and market-corroborated inputs); | ||
Level 3 | | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which are valued based on managements estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. |
Foreign Currency Translation
The companys worldwide operations utilize the U.S. dollar (USD) or local currency as the functional currency, where applicable. The company identifies its separate and distinct foreign entities and groups the foreign entities into two categories: 1) extension of the parent or foreign subsidiaries operating in a hyper-inflationary environment (USD functional currency) and 2) self-contained (local functional currency). If a foreign entity does not align with either category, factors are evaluated and a judgment is made to determine the functional currency.
For foreign entities where the USD is the functional currency, all foreign currency-denominated asset and liability amounts are re-measured into USD at end-of-period exchange rates, except for inventories, prepaid
15
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
expenses, property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets, which are re-measured at historical rates. Foreign currency income and expenses are re-measured at average exchange rates in effect during the year, except for expenses related to balance sheet amounts re-measured at historical exchange rates. Exchange gains and losses arising from re-measurement of foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities are included in income in the period in which they occur.
For foreign entities where the local currency is the functional currency, assets and liabilities denominated in local currencies are translated into USD at end-of-period exchange rates and the resultant translation adjustments are reported, net of their related tax effects, as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss in equity. Assets and liabilities denominated in other than the local currency are re-measured into the local currency prior to translation into USD and the resultant exchange gains or losses are included in income in the period in which they occur. Income and expenses are translated into USD at average exchange rates in effect during the period.
The company changes the functional currency of its separate and distinct foreign entities only when significant changes in economic facts and circumstances indicate clearly that the functional currency has changed.
Inventories
The companys inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Elements of cost in inventories include raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. Stores and supplies are valued at cost or net realizable value, whichever is lower; cost is generally determined by the average cost method.
As of December 31, 2017 approximately 60 percent , 30 percent , and 10 percent of the companys inventories were accounted for under the first-in, first-out (FIFO), average cost and the last-in, first-out (LIFO) methods, respectively. As of December 31, 2016 approximately 55 percent , 30 percent , and 15 percent of the companys inventories were accounted for under the FIFO, average cost and LIFO methods, respectively. Inventories accounted for under the FIFO method are primarily comprised of products with shorter shelf lives such as seeds, certain food-ingredients and enzymes.
The company establishes allowances for obsolescence of inventory based upon quality considerations and assumptions about future demand and market conditions.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. In connection with the Merger, the preliminary estimated fair value of property, plant and equipment is determined using a market approach and a replacement cost approach. Refer to Note 3 for further information. Depreciation is based on the estimated service lives of depreciable assets and is calculated using the straight-line method. Fully depreciated assets are retained in property and accumulated depreciation accounts until they are removed from service. When assets are surrendered, retired, sold, or otherwise disposed of, their gross carrying values and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the Consolidated Balance Sheets and included in determining gain or loss on such disposals.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The company records goodwill when the purchase price of a business acquisition exceeds the estimated fair value of net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level annually, or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit has more likely than not declined below its carrying value. In connection with the Merger
16
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Transaction, the company adopted the policy of DowDuPont and performed an annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2017. In the Predecessor periods, the annual impairment test was performed in the third quarter.
When testing goodwill for impairment, the company has the option to first perform qualitative testing to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If the company chooses not to complete a qualitative assessment for a given reporting unit or if the initial assessment indicates that it is more likely than not that the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, additional quantitative testing is required. The companys fair value methodology is primarily based on discounted cash flow techniques. See Note 12 for further information on goodwill.
Indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment at least annually; however, these tests are performed more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset may be impaired. Impairment exists when carrying value exceeds fair value. The companys fair value methodology is primarily based on discounted cash flow techniques.
Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives, generally on a straight-line basis for periods ranging primarily from 1 to 23 years. The company continually evaluates the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets. Once these assets are fully amortized, they are removed from the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. The carrying value of a long-lived asset group is considered impaired when the total projected undiscounted cash flows from the assets are separately identifiable and are less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived asset. The companys fair value methodology is an estimate of fair market value which is made based on prices of similar assets or other valuation methodologies including present value techniques. Long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, if material, are classified as held for sale and reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, and depreciation is ceased. Long-lived assets to be disposed of other than by sale are classified as held and used until they are disposed of and reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value. Depreciation is recognized over the remaining useful life of the assets.
Derivative Instruments
Derivative instruments are reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair values. The company utilizes derivatives to manage exposures to foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Changes in the fair values of derivative instruments that are not designated as hedges are recorded in current period earnings. For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of any hedge is reported in accumulated other comprehensive loss until it is cleared to earnings during the same period in which the hedged item affects earnings. The ineffective portion of all hedges is recognized in current period earnings.
In the event that a derivative designated as a hedge of a firm commitment or an anticipated transaction is terminated prior to the maturation of the hedged transaction, gains or losses realized at termination are deferred and included in the measurement of the hedged transaction. If a hedged transaction matures, or is sold, extinguished, or terminated prior to the maturity of a derivative designated as a hedge of such transaction, gains or losses associated with the derivative through the date the transaction matured are included in the measurement of the hedged transaction and
17
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
the derivative is reclassified as for trading purposes. Derivatives designated as hedges of anticipated transactions are reclassified as for trading purposes if the anticipated transaction is no longer probable.
In the Predecessor period, the company reflected non-qualified hedge programs, specifically forward contracts, options and cash collateral activity, within cash flows from investing activities. In the Predecessor period, the company reflected cash flows from qualified programs within the line item it related to (i.e., revenue hedge cash flows presented within changes from accounts receivable). In the Successor period, the company included foreign currency exchange contract settlements within cash flows from operating activities, regardless of hedge accounting qualification. See Note 18 for additional discussion regarding the companys objectives and strategies for derivative instruments.
Environmental Matters
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation efforts progress or as additional technical or legal information becomes available. Accruals for environmental liabilities are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in accrued and other current liabilities and other noncurrent obligations at undiscounted amounts. Accruals for related insurance or other third-party recoveries for environmental liabilities are recorded when it is probable that a recovery will be realized and are included in the consolidated balance sheets as accounts and notes receivablenet.
Environmental costs are capitalized if the costs extend the life of the property, increase its capacity, and/or mitigate or prevent contamination from future operations. Environmental costs are also capitalized in recognition of legal asset retirement obligations resulting from the acquisition, construction and/or normal operation of a long-lived asset. Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and cleanup are charged to expense. Estimated future incremental operations, maintenance and management costs directly related to remediation are accrued when such costs are probable and reasonably estimable.
Revenue Recognition
The company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable, and the earnings process is complete. The companys revenues are from the sale of a wide range of products to a diversified base of customers around the world. Revenue for product sales is recognized when title and risk of loss have been transferred, collectability is reasonably assured and pricing is fixed or determinable. A majority of product sales are sold FOB (free on board) shipping point or, with respect to non-United States of America (U.S.) customers, an equivalent basis. Accruals are made for sales returns and other allowances based on the companys experience. The company accounts for cash sales incentives as a reduction in sales and noncash sales incentives as a charge to cost of goods sold or selling expense, depending on the nature of the incentive. Amounts billed to customers for shipping and handling fees are included in net sales and costs incurred by the company for the delivery of goods are classified as cost of goods sold in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Taxes on revenue-producing transactions are excluded from net sales.
The company periodically enters into prepayment contracts with the agriculture product lines customers and receives advance payments for product to be delivered in future periods. These advance payments are recorded as deferred revenue (classified as accrued and other current liabilities) or debt, depending on the nature of the program. Revenue associated with advance payments is recognized as shipments are made and title, ownership and risk of loss pass to the customer.
Licensing and royalty income is recognized in accordance with agreed upon terms, when performance obligations are satisfied, the amount is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.
18
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Royalty Expense
The companys agriculture product line currently has certain third party biotechnology trait license agreements, which require up-front and variable payments subject to the licensor meeting certain conditions. These payments are reflected as other current assets and other assets and are amortized to cost of goods sold as seeds containing the respective trait technology are utilized over the life of the license. The company evaluates the carrying value of the prepaid royalties when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable.
Cost of Goods Sold
Successor periodsCost of goods sold primarily includes the cost of manufacture and delivery, ingredients or raw materials, direct salaries, wages and benefits and overhead, non-capitalizable costs associated with capital projects and other operational expenses. No amortization of intangibles is included within costs of goods sold.
Predecessor periodsCost of goods sold primarily includes the cost of manufacture and delivery, ingredients or raw materials, direct salaries, wages and benefits and overhead.
Other Operating Charges
Predecessor periodsOther operating charges includes product claim charges and recoveries, non-capitalizable costs associated with capital projects and other operational expenses.
Research and Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development expense includes costs (primarily consisting of employee costs, materials, contract services, research agreements, and other external spend) relating to the discovery and development of new products, enhancement of existing products and regulatory approval of new and existing products.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Successor periodsSelling, general and administrative expenses primarily include selling and marketing expenses, commissions, functional costs, and business management expenses.
Predecessor periodsSelling, general and administrative expenses primarily include selling and marketing expenses, commissions, functional costs, business management expenses and integration and separation costs.
Integration and Separation Costs
Successor periodsIntegration and separation costs includes costs incurred to prepare for and close the Merger, post-Merger integration expenses and costs incurred to prepare for the Intended Business Separations. These costs primarily consist of financial advisory, information technology, legal, accounting, consulting and other professional advisory fees associated with preparation and execution of these activities.
Litigation
Accruals for legal matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs, such as outside counsel fees and expenses, are charged to expense in the period incurred.
19
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Severance Costs
Severance benefits are provided to employees under the companys ongoing benefit arrangements. Severance costs are accrued when management commits to a plan of termination and it becomes probable that employees will be entitled to benefits at amounts that can be reasonably estimated.
Insurance/Self-Insurance
The company self-insures certain risks where permitted by law or regulation, including workers compensation, vehicle liability and employee related benefits. Liabilities associated with these risks are estimated in part by considering historical claims experience, demographic factors and other actuarial assumptions. For other risks, the company uses a combination of insurance and self-insurance, reflecting comprehensive reviews of relevant risks. A receivable for an insurance recovery is generally recognized when the loss has occurred and collection is considered probable.
Income Taxes
The company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets or liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date (see Note 7 for further information relating to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Job Act).
The company recognizes the financial statement effects of an uncertain income tax position when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. The company accrues for other tax contingencies when it is probable that a liability to a taxing authority has been incurred and the amount of the contingency can be reasonably estimated. The current portion of uncertain income tax positions is included in income taxes payable and the long-term portion is included in other noncurrent obligations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Provision is made for taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and related companies to the extent that such earnings are not deemed to be permanently invested. Income tax related penalties are included in the provision for income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits is included within the (benefit from) provision for income taxes from continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the Successor period. In the Predecessor period, interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits is included within sundry incomenet in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Segments
Effective with the Merger, DuPonts business activities are components of its parent companys business operations. DuPonts business activities, including the assessment of performance and allocation of resources, are reviewed and managed by DowDuPont. Information used by the chief operating decision maker of DuPont relates to the company in its entirety. Accordingly, there are no separate reportable business segments for DuPont under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 280 Segment Reporting and DuPonts business results are reported in this Form 10-K as a single operating segment. Prior years segment information has been made to conform to the current presentation.
20
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
NOTE 2RECENT ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, CompensationStock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which modifies the accounting for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees. The new guidance requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies to be recorded in the income statement when stock awards vest or are settled. In addition, cash flows related to excess tax benefits will no longer be separately classified as a financing activity apart from other income tax cash flows. The standard also allows the company to repurchase more of an employees vested shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting, and clarifies that all cash payments made to tax authorities on an employees behalf for withheld shares should be presented as a financing activity on the statement of cash flows. The company adopted this standard as of January 1, 2017.
The primary impact of adoption was the recognition of excess tax benefits in the companys provision for income taxes rather than additional paid-in capital, which is applied prospectively in accordance with the guidance. Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recognition of $2 million and $30 million of excess tax benefits in the companys provision for income taxes rather than additional paid-in capital for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 and the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, respectively.
The company elected to apply the presentation requirements for cash flows related to excess tax benefits retrospectively to all periods presented, which resulted in an increase to both net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used for financing activities of $27 million and $74 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The presentation requirements for cash flows related to employee taxes paid for withheld shares resulted in an increase to both net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used for financing activities of $30 million and $32 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The remaining updates required by this standard did not have a material impact to the companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, IntangiblesGoodwill and Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to determine the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit to measure goodwill impairment. Under the amendments in the new ASU, goodwill impairment testing will be performed by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognizing an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting units fair value. The new standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and should be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim goodwill impairment testing performed after January 1, 2017. In connection with the Merger Transaction, the company adopted the policy of the parent company and performed its annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter. Previously, the annual impairment test was performed in the third quarter. The company early adopted the new guidance for the annual goodwill impairment test that was performed in the fourth quarter of 2017. See Note 12 for additional information.
Accounting Guidance Issued But Not Adopted as of December 31, 2017
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The new guidance expands and refines hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and aligns the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged items in the financial statements. For cash flow and net investment hedges
21
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
existing as of the date of adoption, an entity should apply a cumulative-effect adjustment related to eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which an entity adopts. Presentation and disclosure guidance is required to be adopted prospectively. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period. All transition requirements and elections should be applied to hedging relationships existing (that is, hedging relationships in which the hedging instrument has not expired, been sold, terminated, or exercised or the entity has not removed the designation of the hedging relationship) on the date of adoption. The effect of adoption should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, CompensationRetirement Benefits (Topic 715), Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. The new guidance requires registrants to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item or items as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization in assets. Registrants will present the other components of net periodic benefit cost separately from the service cost component; and, the line item or items used in the income statement to present the other components of net periodic benefit cost must be disclosed. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period. The new standard must be adopted retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic benefit cost in the income statement, and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in assets. The company plans to adopt this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and is currently evaluating the impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures. The company anticipates approximately half the costs will be reclassified from cost of goods sold, with the remainder reclassified from selling, general and administrative expenses and research and development expense, to sundry incomenet in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 16 for the components of net periodic benefit cost.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The new guidance narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities (collectively, the set) is not a business. To be considered a business, the set would need to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs, as defined by the ASU. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018 and will apply it prospectively to all applicable transactions after the adoption date.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), which clarifies how entities should present restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows, and, as a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. An entity with a material balance of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents must disclose information about the nature of the restrictions. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted and the new guidance
22
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
must be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The new guidance will change the presentation of restricted cash in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and will be applied retrospectively in the first quarter of 2018.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The new guidance requires that entities recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs, rather than when the asset is sold to an outside party. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period. The new guidance requires adoption on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The company plans to adopt this guidance in the first quarter of 2018 with the expectation that this guidance will have an immaterial impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The new guidance makes eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The new guidance requires adoption on a retrospective basis unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case the company would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on the Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures, but does not expect there to be a significant impact.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The amendments under the new guidance will require lessees to recognize almost all leases on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. The new leasing standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition, requiring application at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on the Consolidated Financial Statements and related disclosures. The company is the lessee under various agreements for facilities and equipment that are currently accounted for as operating leases. A discussion of these leases is included in Note 14, Commitments and Contingent Liabilities.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which was further updated in March, April, May and December 2016, as well as September and November 2017. The new guidance clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for GAAP. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The new standard also will result in additional disclosure requirements to describe the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. In July 2015, the FASB approved a deferral of the ASU effective date from annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016 to annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative-effect) transition method of adoption. The company will adopt the standard in the first quarter of 2018 under the modified retrospective transition method. The company has substantially completed its evaluation of the impact
23
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
of the new standard on the Consolidated Financial Statements and has determined that the transition adjustment to be recorded upon adoption is not material and the company does not expect material changes in the timing of revenue recognition. The company continues to evaluate the impact of the new standard on its disclosures.
Acquisition of Granular, Inc.
On August 31, 2017, the company acquired Granular, Inc., a leading provider of software and analytics tools that help farms improve efficiency, profitability, and sustainability. The purchase price was approximately $250 million and was primarily allocated to goodwill, developed technology, and customer relationships. The fair value of the acquired assets related to Granular, Inc. are included in the fair value measurement of DuPonts assets and liabilities, discussed below.
Merger with Dow
Upon completion of the Merger, (i) each share of common stock, par value $0.30 per share, of the company (the DuPont Common Stock) was converted into the right to receive 1.2820 fully paid and non-assessable shares of DowDuPont common stock, par value $0.01 per share, (DowDuPont Common Stock), in addition to cash in lieu of any fractional shares of DowDuPont Common Stock, and (ii) each share of DuPont Preferred Stock$4.50 Series and DuPont Preferred Stock$3.50 Series (collectively DuPont Preferred Stock) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger Effectiveness Time remains issued and outstanding and was unaffected by the Merger.
As provided in the Merger Agreement, at the Merger Effectiveness Time, all options relating to shares of DuPont Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger were generally automatically converted into options relating to shares of DowDuPont Common Stock and all restricted stock units and performance based restricted stock units relating to shares of DuPont Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Mergers were generally automatically converted into restricted stock units relating to shares of DowDuPont Common Stock, in each case, after giving effect to appropriate adjustments to reflect the Mergers and otherwise generally on the same terms and conditions as applied under the applicable plans and award agreements immediately prior to the Merger Effectiveness Time. See Note 17 for further discussion.
Prior to the Merger, shares of DuPont Common Stock were registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE). As a result of the Merger, on August 31, 2017 , the company requested that the NYSE withdraw the shares of DuPont Common Stock from listing on the NYSE and filed a Form 25 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to report that DuPont Common Stock is no longer listed on the NYSE. DuPont continues to have preferred stock outstanding and it remains listed on the NYSE. DowDuPont Common Stock is listed and trades on the NYSE, ticker symbol DWDP.
As a condition of the regulatory approval of the Merger, DuPont was required to divest a portion of its crop protection product line, including certain research and development capabilities. See Note 4 for additional information.
DuPont and Dow intend to pursue, subject to the receipt of approval by the Board of Directors of DowDuPont, the separation of the combined companys agriculture, specialty products and materials science businesses through a series of tax-efficient transactions (collectively, the Intended Business Separations).
24
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Preliminary Allocation of Purchase Price
Based on an evaluation of the provisions of ASC 805, Business Combinations, (ASC 805) Dow was determined to be the accounting acquirer in the Merger. DowDuPont has applied the acquisition method of accounting with respect to the assets and liabilities of DuPont, which have been measured at fair value as of the date of the Merger. In connection with the Merger and the related accounting determination, DuPont has elected to apply push-down accounting and reflect in its financial statements the fair value of assets and liabilities. Such fair values have been reflected in the Successor Consolidated Financial Statements.
DuPonts assets and liabilities were measured at estimated fair values as of the Merger Effectiveness Time, primarily using Level 3 inputs. Estimates of fair value represent managements best estimate which require a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties. Third-party valuation specialists were engaged to assist in the valuation of these assets and liabilities.
The total fair value of consideration transferred for the Merger was $74,680 million. Total consideration is comprised of the equity value of the DowDuPont shares as of the Merger Effectiveness Time that were issued in exchange for DuPont shares, the cash value for fractional shares, and the portion of DuPonts share awards and share options earned as of the Merger Effectiveness Time. Share awards and share options converted to DowDuPont equity instruments, but not vested, were $144 million as of August 31, 2017, which will be expensed over the remaining future vesting period.
The following table summarizes the fair value of consideration exchanged as a result of the Merger:
(In millions, except exchange ratio) |
||||
DuPont Common Stock outstanding as of the Merger Effectiveness Time |
868.3 | |||
DuPont exchange ratio |
1.2820 | |||
|
|
|||
DowDuPont Common Stock issued in exchange for DuPont Common Stock |
1,113.2 | |||
|
|
|||
Fair value of DowDuPont Common Stock issued 1 |
$ | 74,195 | ||
Fair value of DowDuPont equity awards issued in exchange for outstanding DuPont equity awards 2 |
485 | |||
|
|
|||
Total consideration |
$ | 74,680 | ||
|
|
1. |
Amount was determined based on the price per share of Dow Common Stock of $66.65 on August 31, 2017. |
2. |
Represents the fair value of replacement awards issued for DuPonts equity awards outstanding immediately before the Merger and attributable to the service periods prior to the Merger. The previous DuPont equity awards were converted into the right to receive 1.2820 shares of DowDuPont Common Stock. |
The acquisition method of accounting requires, among other things, that identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized on the balance sheet at the fair values as of the acquisition date. In determining the fair value, DowDuPont utilized various forms of the income, cost and market approaches depending on the asset or liability being fair valued. The estimation of fair value required significant judgments related to future net cash flows (including net sales, cost of products sold, selling and marketing costs, and working capital/contributory asset charges), discount rates reflecting the risk inherent in each cash flow stream, competitive trends, market comparables and other factors. Inputs were generally determined by taking into account historical data, supplemented by current and anticipated market conditions, and growth rates.
25
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The table below presents the preliminary fair value that was allocated to DuPonts assets and liabilities based upon fair values as determined by DowDuPont. The valuation process to determine the fair values is not yet complete. DuPont estimated the preliminary fair value of acquired assets and liabilities as of the date of acquisition based on information currently available and continues to adjust those estimates upon refinement of market participant assumptions for integrating businesses, finalization of tax returns in the pre-merger period and application of push-down accounting at the subsidiary level. The preliminary fair values are substantially complete with the exception of identifiable intangible assets, property, plant, and equipment, income taxes and goodwill. As DuPont finalizes the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, additional purchase price adjustments may be recorded during the measurement period, but no later than one year from the date of the acquisition. DuPont will reflect measurement period adjustments, if any, in the period in which the adjustments are recognized. Final determination of the fair values may result in further adjustments to the values presented in the following table.
Estimated
fair value as previously reported 1 |
Measurement
period adjustments 2 |
Estimated
fair value adjusted |
||||||||||
(In millions) |
||||||||||||
Fair Value of Assets as of the Merger Effectiveness Time |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,005 | $ | | $ | 4,005 | ||||||
Marketable securities |
2,849 | | 2,849 | |||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable |
7,851 | | 7,851 | |||||||||
Inventories |
8,886 | (79 | ) | 8,807 | ||||||||
Other current assets |
360 | | 360 | |||||||||
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates |
1,685 | (31 | ) | 1,654 | ||||||||
Assets held for salecurrent |
3,184 | 564 | 3,748 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
12,122 | (181 | ) | 11,941 | ||||||||
Goodwill 3 |
45,501 | (396 | ) | 45,105 | ||||||||
Other intangible assets 3 |
27,844 | (623 | ) | 27,221 | ||||||||
Deferred income tax assets |
487 | (203 | ) | 284 | ||||||||
Other assets |
2,076 | | 2,076 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 116,850 | $ | (949 | ) | $ | 115,901 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fair Value of Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations |
$ | 5,319 | $ | | $ | 5,319 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
3,283 | | 3,283 | |||||||||
Income taxes payable |
140 | | 140 | |||||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
3,517 | | 3,517 | |||||||||
Liabilities held for salecurrent |
104 | 11 | 115 | |||||||||
Long-term debt |
9,878 | | 9,878 | |||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
9,408 | (940 | ) | 8,468 | ||||||||
Pension and other post employment benefitsnoncurrent |
8,092 | (36 | ) | 8,056 | ||||||||
Other noncurrent obligations |
2,028 | | 2,028 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Liabilities |
$ | 41,769 | $ | (965 | ) | $ | 40,804 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Noncontrolling interests |
162 | 16 | 178 | |||||||||
Preferred stock |
239 | | 239 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fair Value of Net Assets (Consideration for the Merger) |
$ | 74,680 | $ | | $ | 74,680 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
1. |
As previously reported in the companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2017. |
2. |
DuPont recorded measurement period adjustments in the fourth quarter of 2017 to reflect facts and circumstances in existence as of the Merger Effectiveness Time. These measurement period adjustments primarily related to changes in preliminary valuation assumptions, including market participant estimates of cash flows and estimates of asset useful lives, as well as other initial estimates. All measurement period adjustments were offset against goodwill. |
3. |
See Note 12 for additional information. |
The significant fair value adjustments included in the preliminary allocation of purchase price are discussed below.
Inventories
Inventory is primarily comprised of finished products of $4,929 million, semi-finished products of $3,055 million and raw materials and stores and supplies of $823 million. The fair value of finished goods was calculated as the estimated selling price, adjusted for costs of the selling effort and a reasonable profit allowance relating to the selling effort. The fair value of semi-finished inventory was primarily calculated as the estimated selling price, adjusted for estimated costs to complete the manufacturing, estimated costs of the selling effort, as well as a reasonable profit margin on the remaining manufacturing and selling effort. The fair value of raw materials and stores and supplies was determined to approximate the historical carrying value. For inventory accounted for under the FIFO method and average cost method, the preliminary fair value step-up of inventory will be recognized in costs of goods sold as the inventory is sold. For inventory accounted for under the LIFO method, the preliminary fair value of inventory becomes the LIFO base layer inventory. The pre-tax amount of inventory step-up recognized for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, was $1,538 million, of which $1,434 million was reflected in costs of goods sold within loss from continuing operations before income taxes and $104 million is reflected in loss from discontinued operations after income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Property, Plant & Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is comprised of machinery and equipment of $7,466 million , buildings of $2,583 million, construction in progress of $980 million and land and land improvements of $912 million. The preliminary estimated fair value of property and equipment was primarily determined using a market approach for land and certain types of equipment, and a replacement cost approach for other property and equipment. The market approach for certain types of equipment represents a sales comparison that measures the value of an asset through an analysis of sales and offerings of comparable assets. The replacement cost approach used for all other depreciable property and equipment measures the value of an asset by estimating the cost to acquire or construct comparable assets and adjusts for age and condition of the asset.
Goodwill
The excess of the consideration for the Merger over the preliminary net fair value of assets and liabilities was recorded as goodwill. The Merger resulted in the recognition of $45,105 million of goodwill, none of which is deductible. Goodwill largely consists of expected cost synergies resulting from the Merger and the Intended Business Separations, the assembled workforce of DuPont, and future technology and customers.
27
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets primarily consist of acquired customer related assets, developed technology, trademarks and tradenames, and germplasm. The preliminary customer-related value was determined using the excess earnings method while the preliminary developed technology, trademarks and trade names, and germplasm values were primarily determined utilizing the relief from royalty method. Both the excess earnings and relief from royalty methods are forms of the income approach. Refer to Note 12 for further information on other intangible assets.
Deferred Income Tax Assets and Liabilities
The deferred income tax assets and liabilities include the expected future federal, state, and foreign tax consequences associated with temporary differences between the preliminary fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the respective tax bases. Tax rates utilized in calculating deferred income taxes generally represent the enacted statutory tax rates at the Merger Effectiveness Time in the jurisdictions in which legal title of the underlying asset or liability resides. Refer to Note 7 for further information related to the remeasurement of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as a result of the enactment of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December 2017.
The preliminary fair value of deferred income tax assets includes a $172 million adjustment to derecognize a valuation allowance for certain historical net operating losses that will not be fully realized as a result of the Merger. Included in the fair value adjustment related to deferred income tax liabilities is a $546 million adjustment reflecting a change in determination as to the reinvestment strategy of certain foreign operations of the company.
Integration and Separation Costs
Integration and separation costs have been and are expected to be significant. These costs to date primarily have consisted of financial advisory, information technology, legal, accounting, consulting, and other professional advisory fees associated with the preparation and execution of activities related to the Merger and the Intended Business Separations. These costs are recorded within integration and separation costs in the Successor period and the costs are recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses in the Predecessor periods within the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the
Period September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the
Period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
$ | 314 | ||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | 581 | $ | 386 | $ | 10 |
H&N Business
On November 1, 2017, the company completed the FMC Transactions through the acquisition of the H&N Business and the disposition of the Divested Ag Business. The acquisition will be integrated into the nutrition and health product line to enhance DuPonts position as a leading provider of sustainable, bio-based food ingredients and allow for expanded capabilities in the pharma excipients space. The company accounted for the acquisition in accordance with ASC 805, which requires the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recognized on the balance sheet at their fair values as of the acquisition date.
28
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The following table summarizes the fair value of consideration exchanged as a result of the FMC Transactions:
(In millions) |
||||
Fair Value of Divested Ag Business 1 |
$ | 3,665 | ||
Less: Cash received 2 |
1,200 | |||
Less: Favorable contracts 3 |
495 | |||
|
|
|||
Fair Value of H&N Business |
$ | 1,970 | ||
|
|
1. |
Refer to Note 4 for additional information. |
2. |
The FMC Transactions include a cash consideration payment to DuPont of approximately $1,200 million, which reflects the difference in value between the Divested Ag Business and the H&N Business, subject to certain customary inventory and net working capital adjustments. |
3. |
Upon closing and pursuant to the terms of the FMC Transaction Agreement, DuPont entered into favorable supply contracts with FMC. DuPont recorded these contracts as intangible assets recognized at the fair value of off-market contracts. Refer to Notes 4 and 12 for additional information. |
The table below presents the preliminary fair value that was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The purchase accounting and purchase price allocation for the H&N Business are substantially complete. However, the company continues to refine the preliminary valuation of certain acquired assets, such as inventories, intangibles, deferred income taxes, and property plant and equipment, which could impact the amount of residual goodwill recorded. The company will finalize the amounts recognized as it obtains the information necessary to complete the analysis, but no later than one year from the date of the acquisition. Final determination of the fair values may result in further adjustments to the values presented in the following table.
Successor | ||||
(In millions) |
November
1,
2017 |
|||
Fair Value of Assets |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 16 | ||
Accounts and notes receivable |
144 | |||
Inventories |
314 | |||
Property, plant and equipment |
505 | |||
Goodwill |
718 | |||
Other intangible assets |
435 | |||
Other current and non-current assets |
16 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
$ | 2,148 | ||
|
|
|||
Fair Value of Liabilities |
||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities |
$ | 70 | ||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
108 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
$ | 178 | ||
|
|
|||
Fair Value of Net Assets (Consideration for the H&N Business) |
$ | 1,970 | ||
|
|
The significant fair value adjustments included in the preliminary allocation of purchase price are discussed below.
29
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Inventories
Acquired inventory is comprised of finished goods of $153 million, semi-finished products of $85 million and raw materials and stores and supplies of $76 million. Fair value of inventory was calculated using a net realizable value approach for finished goods and semi-finished products and a replacement cost approach for raw materials and stores and supplies. The preliminary fair value step-up of inventory of $100 million will be recognized in costs of goods sold as the inventory is sold. The pre-tax amount recognized during the period ending November 1 through December 31, 2017, was $35 million, which was reflected in cost of goods sold within loss from continuing operations before income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Property, Plant & Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is comprised of machinery and equipment of $372 million , buildings of $63 million, land and land improvements of $39 million, and construction in progress of $31 million. The preliminary estimated fair values were determined using a combination of a market approach and replacement cost approach.
Goodwill
The excess of the consideration for the H&N Business over the preliminary net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed resulted in the recognition of $718 million of goodwill, of which $208 million is tax-deductible. Goodwill is attributable to the H&N Businesss workforce and expected cost synergies in procurement, production and market access.
Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets includes customer-related intangible assets of $268 million , developed technology of $130 million, and trademarks and tradenames of $37 million. The preliminary customer-related fair value was determined using the excess earnings method while the preliminary developed technology, trademarks and tradenames fair values were primarily determined utilizing the relief from royalty method.
Results of Operations
The following table provides net sales and (loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes of the H&N Business included in the companys results since the acquisition.
Successor | ||||
(In millions) |
For the
Period November 1 through December 31, 2017 |
|||
Net sales |
$ | 102 | ||
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | (12 | ) |
The H&N Business results include $35 million that was recognized in cost of goods sold as inventory was sold related to the fair value step-up of inventories in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, for the period of November 1 through December 31, 2017.
The company evaluated the disclosure requirements under ASC 805 and determined the H&N Business was not considered a material business combination for purposes of disclosing supplemental pro forma information.
30
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
NOTE 4DIVESTITURES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Merger RemedyDivested Ag Business
On March 31, 2017, the company and FMC entered into the FMC Transaction Agreement. Under the FMC Transaction Agreement, FMC acquired the Divested Ag Business that DuPont was required to divest in order to obtain EC approval of the Merger Transaction as described in Note 1 and DuPont agreed to acquire the H&N Business. The sale of the Divested Ag Business meets the criteria for discontinued operations and as such, earnings are included within (Loss) Income from discontinued operations after income taxes for all periods presented.
On November 1, 2017, the company completed the FMC Transactions through the disposition of the Divested Ag Business and the acquisition of the H&N Business. The preliminary fair value as determined by the company of the H&N Business is $1,970 million. The FMC Transactions include a cash consideration payment to DuPont of approximately $1,200 million, which reflects the difference in value between the Divested Ag Business and the H&N Business, as well as favorable contracts with FMC of $495 million, subject to adjustments for inventory of the Divested Ag Business and net working capital of the H&N Business. Due to the proximity of the Merger and the closing of the sale, the carrying value of the Divested Ag Business approximated the fair value of the consideration received, thus no resulting gain or loss was recognized on the sale. Refer to Note 3 for further information on the H&N Business.
The results of operations of the Divested Ag Business are presented as discontinued operations as summarized below:
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For
the
Period September 1 through December 31, 2017 1 |
For the
Period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 199 | $ | 1,068 | $ | 1,385 | $ | 1,473 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
194 | 412 | 514 | 521 | ||||||||||||
Other operating charges |
17 | 19 | 25 | |||||||||||||
Research and development expenses |
30 | 95 | 139 | 163 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses 2 |
102 | 146 | 176 | 187 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset related chargesnet |
(1 | ) | | (4 | ) | 15 | ||||||||||
Sundry (expense) incomenet |
(1 | ) | 7 | 1 | 7 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations before income taxes |
(127 | ) | 405 | 542 | 569 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Benefit from) Provision for income taxes |
(50 | ) | 79 | 103 | 121 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations after income taxes |
$ | (77 | ) | $ | 326 | $ | 439 | $ | 448 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Includes results of operations for the period September 1 through October 31, 2017, as the Divested Ag Business was disposed of on November 1, 2017. |
2. |
Successor period includes $44 million of transaction costs associated with the disposal of the Divested Ag Business. |
31
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The following table presents depreciation and capital expenditures of the discontinued operations related to the Divested Ag Business:
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the
Period September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the
Period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Depreciation |
$ | | $ | 21 | $ | 32 | $ | 30 | ||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 5 | $ | 8 | $ | 40 | $ | 77 |
The carrying amount of major classes of assets and liabilities classified as assets and liabilities of discontinued operations at December 31, 2016 related to the Divested Ag Business consist of the following:
Predecessor | ||||
(In millions) |
December
31,
2016 |
|||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 57 | ||
Accounts and notes receivablenet |
12 | |||
Inventories |
323 | |||
Other current assets |
1 | |||
Property, plant and equipmentnet |
380 | |||
Goodwill |
11 | |||
Other assets |
5 | |||
|
|
|||
Assets held for sale |
$ | 789 | ||
|
|
|||
Accounts payable |
27 | |||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
12 | |||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
6 | |||
Other noncurrent obligations |
29 | |||
|
|
|||
Liabilities held for sale |
$ | 74 | ||
|
|
Upon closing and pursuant to the terms of the FMC Transaction Agreement, DuPont and FMC entered into favorable supply agreements and certain ancillary agreements, including manufacturing service agreements and transition service agreements. Under the terms of the favorable supply agreements, FMC will supply product to DuPont at cost for a period of up to five years and, as a result, DuPont recorded an intangible asset of $495 million upon closing that will amortize over a period of five years.
Food Safety Diagnostic Sale
In February 2017, the company completed the sale of global food safety diagnostics to Hygiena LLC. The sale resulted in a pre-tax gain of $162 million ( $86 million net of tax). The gain was recorded in sundry incomenet in the companys Consolidated Statement of Operations for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017.
DuPont (Shenzhen) Manufacturing Limited
In March 2016, the company recognized the sale of its 100 percent ownership interest in DuPont (Shenzhen) Manufacturing Limited to the Feixiang Group. The sale of the entity, which held certain buildings and other assets, resulted in a pre-tax gain of $369 million ( $214 million net of tax). The gain was recorded in sundry incomenet in the companys Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.
32
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Performance Chemicals
On July 1, 2015, DuPont completed the separation of its Performance Chemicals segment through the spin-off of all of the issued and outstanding stock of The Chemours Company (the Separation). In connection with the Separation, the company and The Chemours Company (Chemours) entered into a Separation Agreement (the Separation Agreement), discussed below, and a Tax Matters Agreement and certain ancillary agreements, including an employee matters agreement, agreements related to transition and site services, and intellectual property cross licensing arrangements. In addition, the companies have entered into certain supply agreements.
Separation Agreement
The company and Chemours entered into a Separation Agreement that sets forth, among other things, the agreements between the company and Chemours regarding the principal transactions necessary to effect the Separation and also sets forth ancillary agreements that govern certain aspects of the companys relationship with Chemours after the separation. Among other matters, the Separation Agreement and the ancillary agreements provide for the allocation between DuPont and Chemours of assets, employees, liabilities and obligations (including investments, property and employee benefits and tax-related assets and liabilities) attributable to periods prior to, at and after the completion of the Separation.
Pursuant to the Separation Agreement and the Amendment to the Separation Agreement, as discussed below, Chemours indemnifies DuPont against certain litigation, environmental, workers compensation and other liabilities that arose prior to the distribution. The term of this indemnification is generally indefinite and includes defense costs and expenses, as well as monetary and non-monetary settlements and judgments. In 2017, DuPont and Chemours amended the Separation Agreement to provide for a limited sharing of potential future PFOA liabilities for a period of five years beginning July 6, 2017. In connection with the recognition of liabilities related to these matters, the company records an indemnification asset when recovery is deemed probable. At December 31, 2017 , the indemnified assets are $80 million within accounts and notes receivablenet and $340 million within other assets along with the corresponding liabilities of $80 million within accrued and other current liabilities and $340 million within other noncurrent obligations on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 14 for further discussion of the amendment to the Separation Agreement and certain litigation and environmental matters indemnified by Chemours.
33
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The results of operations of the Performance Chemicals segment are presented as discontinued operations as summarized below:
Predecessor | ||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the
Period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
|||||||||
Net sales |
$ | | $ | | $ | 2,810 | ||||||
Cost of goods sold |
| | 2,215 | |||||||||
Other operating charges |
335 | 36 | 386 | |||||||||
Research and development expense |
| | 40 | |||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
| | (87 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring and asset related chargesnet |
| | 59 | |||||||||
Sundry incomenet |
3 | 3 | 27 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
| | 32 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations before income taxes |
(332 | ) | (33 | ) | 192 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes |
(125 | ) | (28 | ) | 106 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(Loss) income from discontinued operations after income taxes |
$ | (207 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 86 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations after income taxes for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 includes a charge of $335 million ( $214 million net of tax) in connection with the perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) multi-district litigation settlement.
During the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the company incurred $35 million and $306 million of costs, respectively, in connection with the separation primarily related to professional fees associated with preparation of regulatory filings and separation activities within finance, tax, legal, and information system functions. (Loss) income from discontinued operations during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, includes $35 million and $260 million of these costs, respectively. Income from continuing operations during the year ended December 31, 2015 includes $26 million of these costs, recorded in other operating charges in the companys Consolidated Statements of Operations. Income from continuing operations during the year ended December 31, 2015 also included $20 million of transaction costs incurred for a premium associated with the early retirement of DuPont debt. The company exchanged notes received from Chemours in May 2015 (as part of a dividend payment) for DuPont debt that it then retired. These costs were reported in interest expense in the companys Consolidated Statements of Operations.
In connection with the separation, income from discontinued operations during the year ended December 31, 2015 included pension and other post employment benefit plan curtailment gain of $281 million . In addition, income from discontinued operations during the year ended December 31, 2015, included a restructuring charge of $59 million , consisting of severance and related benefit costs associated with the Performance Chemicals segment to achieve fixed cost and operational productivity improvements for Chemours post-spin.
In connection with the spin-off, the company received a dividend from Chemours in May 2015 of $3,923 million comprised of a cash distribution of $3,416 million and a distribution in-kind of $507 million of 7 percent senior unsecured notes due 2025 (Chemours Notes Received). Chemours financed the dividend payment through
34
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
issuance of approximately $4,000 million of debt, including the Chemours Notes Received (Chemours Debt). Net assets of $431 million were transferred to Chemours on July 1, 2015, including the $4,000 million of Chemours Debt.
The following table presents the depreciation, amortization and purchases of property, plant and equipment of the discontinued operations related to Performance Chemicals:
(In millions) |
Predecessor | |||
For the year ended December 31, |
2015 | |||
Depreciation |
$ | 126 | ||
Amortization of intangible assets |
2 | |||
Capital Expenditures |
235 |
NOTE 5RESTRUCTURING AND ASSET RELATED CHARGESNET
DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program
In September and November 2017, DowDuPont and the company approved post-merger restructuring actions under the DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program (the Synergy Program), adopted by the DowDuPont Board of Directors. The plan is designed to integrate and optimize the organization following the Merger and in preparation for the Intended Business Separations. Based on all actions approved to date under the Synergy Program, DuPont expects to record total pre-tax restructuring charges of $430 million to $600 million, comprised of approximately $320 million to $360 million of severance and related benefits costs; $110 million to $140 million of costs related to contract terminations; and up to $100 million of asset related charges. The Synergy Program includes certain asset actions, including strategic decisions regarding the cellulosic biofuel unit reflected in the preliminary fair value measurement of DuPonts assets as of the merger date. Current estimated total pre-tax restructuring charges could be impacted by future adjustments to the preliminary fair value of DuPonts assets.
For the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, DuPont recorded a pre-tax charge of $187 million, consisting of severance and related benefit costs of $153 million, contract termination costs of $31 million and asset-related charges of $3 million. The charge for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 was recognized in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in the companys Consolidated Statements of Operations. Substantially all of the remaining restructuring charges are expected to be incurred in 2018 and the related actions, including employee separations, associated with this plan are expected to be substantially complete by the end of 2019.
DuPont account balances and activity for the DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program are summarized below:
(In millions) |
Severance and
Related Benefit Costs |
Other
Non-Personnel Charges 1 |
Asset-
Related Charges |
Total | ||||||||||||
Charges to income from continuing operations for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 (Successor) |
$ | 153 | $ | 31 | $ | 3 | $ | 187 | ||||||||
Payments |
(13 | ) | (3 | ) | | (16 | ) | |||||||||
Asset write-offs |
| | (3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Non-cash compensation |
(7 | ) | | | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2017 |
$ | 133 | $ | 28 | $ | | $ | 161 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Other non-personnel charges consist of contractual obligation costs. |
35
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2017 Restructuring Program
During the first quarter 2017, DuPont committed to take actions to improve plant productivity and better position its product lines for productivity and growth before and after the anticipated closing of the Merger Transaction (the 2017 restructuring program). In connection with these actions, the company incurred pre-tax charges of $313 million during the period from January 1 through August 31, 2017 (Predecessor period) recognized in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in the companys Consolidated Statements of Operations. The charge is comprised of $279 million of asset-related charges and $34 million in severance and related benefit costs. The charges primarily relate to the second quarter closure of the safety and construction product line at the Cooper River manufacturing site located near Charleston, South Carolina. The asset-related charges mainly consist of accelerated depreciation associated with the closure. The actions associated with this plan are substantially complete as of December 31, 2017.
Account balances and activity for the 2017 restructuring program are summarized below:
(In millions) |
Severance and
Related Benefit Costs |
Asset
Related Charges 1 |
Total | |||||||||
Charges to income from continuing operations for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 (Predecessor) |
$ | 34 | $ | 279 | $ | 313 | ||||||
Payments |
(8 | ) | | (8 | ) | |||||||
Asset write-offs |
| (279 | ) | $ | (279 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance as of August 31, 2017 |
$ | 26 | $ | | $ | 26 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Charges to income from continuing operations for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 (Successor) |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Payments |
(7 | ) | | (7 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2017 |
$ | 19 | $ | | $ | 19 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Includes accelerated depreciation related to site closure. Charge for accelerated depreciation represents the difference between the depreciation expense to be recognized over the revised useful life of the site, based upon the anticipated date the site will be closed and depreciation expense as determined utilizing the useful life prior to the restructuring action. |
La Porte Plant, La Porte, Texas
In March 2016, DuPont announced its decision to not re-start its insecticide manufacturing facility at the La Porte site located in La Porte, Texas. The facility manufactured Lannate ® and Vydate ® insecticides and has been shut down since November 2014. As a result of this decision, during the year ended December 31, 2016, a pre-tax charge of $68 million was recorded in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in the companys Consolidated Statement of Operations which included $41 million of asset related charges, $16 million of employee severance and related benefit costs, and $11 million of contract termination costs.
2016 Global Cost Savings and Restructuring Plan
In December 2015, DuPont committed to take structural actions across all product lines and staff functions globally to operate more efficiently by further consolidating product lines and aligning staff functions more closely with them as part of a 2016 global cost savings and restructuring plan. As a result, during the year ended
36
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2015, a pre-tax charge of $783 million was recorded, consisting of $778 million of restructuring and asset related chargesnet and $5 million in sundry incomenet in the companys Consolidated Statement of Operations. The charges consisted of $641 million in severance and related benefit costs, $109 million in asset related charges, and $33 million in contract termination charges.
During the year ended December 31, 2016, in connection with the restructuring actions, the company recorded a net pre-tax benefit to earnings of $(81) million, consisting of $(84) million in restructuring and asset related chargesnet and $3 million in sundry incomenet in the companys Consolidated Statement of Operations. The net benefit was comprised of a reduction of $(150) million in severance and related benefit costs, offset by $53 million of asset related charges, and $16 million of contract termination costs. This was primarily due to a reduction in severance and related benefit costs partially offset by the identification of additional projects. The reduction in severance and related benefit costs was driven by elimination of positions at a lower cost than expected as a result of redeployments and attrition as well as lower than estimated individual severance costs.
The company incurred pre-tax charges of $10 million during the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, recognized in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in the companys Consolidated Statement of Operations. This was due to additional severance payments owed to previously terminated executives that became probable during the period. The company incurred a pre-tax benefit of $(5) million for the period from September 1 through December 31, 2017. The reduction in severance and related benefit costs was driven by the elimination of positions at a lower cost than expected.
Account balances and activity for the restructuring program are summarized below:
(In millions) |
Severance and
Related Benefit Costs |
Other
Non-Personnel Charges 1 |
Total | |||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 (Predecessor) |
$ | 100 | $ | 22 | $ | 122 | ||||||
Payments |
(76 | ) | (11 | ) | (87 | ) | ||||||
Net translation adjustment |
2 | | 2 | |||||||||
Other adjustments |
10 | | 10 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance as of August 31, 2017 |
$ | 36 | $ | 11 | $ | 47 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at September 1, 2017 (Successor) |
$ | 36 | $ | 11 | $ | 47 | ||||||
Payments |
(18 | ) | (2 | ) | (20 | ) | ||||||
Other adjustments |
(5 | ) | | (5 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2017 |
$ | 13 | $ | 9 | $ | 22 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Other non-personnel charges consist of contractual obligation costs. |
2014 Restructuring Program
In June 2014, DuPont announced its global, multi-year initiative to redesign its global organization and operating model to reduce costs and improve productivity and agility across all product lines and functions. During the period from September 1 through December 31, 2017, and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, benefits of $(2) million, $(21) million and $(21) million were recorded, respectively, in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in the companys Consolidated Statements of Operations to reduce the accrual for severance costs associated with this program.
37
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Asset Impairment
In the fourth quarter 2015, the company elected to defer further testing and deployment of a multi-year, phased implementation of an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system; which had not been placed in service as of year-end. At December 31, 2016, the company had capitalized costs associated with the ERP system of $435 million. In connection with IT strategy reviews conducted during the fourth quarter of 2016, the company reviewed considerations around the timing of restarting testing and deployment of the ERP system. As a result, the company concluded it intended to complete and place in service the ERP system, however, given the uncertainties related to implementation timing as well as potential developments and changes to technologies in the market place at the time of restart, use of this ERP system could no longer be considered probable. As a result, due to the specificity of the design related to the ERP system, the company determined that the uncompleted ERP system had a fair value of zero and recorded a pre-tax charge of $435 million in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in the companys Consolidated Statement of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2016.
The company recognized a $158 million pre-tax impairment charge in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in the companys Consolidated Statement of Operations during the year ended December 31, 2016 related to indefinite-lived intangible trade names. In connection with the companys strategy reviews and brand realignment conducted during the third quarter 2016, the company decided to phase out the use of certain acquired trade names resulting in a change from an indefinite life to a finite useful life for these assets. As a result of these changes, the carrying value of the trade name assets exceeded the fair value.
The basis of the fair value for the charges was calculated utilizing an income approach (relief from royalty method) using Level 3 inputs within the fair value hierarchy, as described in Note 1. The key assumptions used in the calculation included projected revenue, royalty rates and discount rates. These key assumptions involve management judgment and estimates relating to future operating performance and economic conditions that may differ from actual cash flows. After the recognition of the impairment charge, the remaining net book value of the trade names was $28 million, which represented fair value.
During the first quarter 2015, a $38 million pre-tax impairment charge was recorded in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in the companys Consolidated Statement of Operations. The majority relates to a cost basis investment in which the assessment resulted from the ventures revised operating plan reflecting underperformance of its European wheat based ethanol facility and deteriorating European ethanol market conditions. One of the primary investors communicated that they would not fund the revised operating plan of the investee. As a result, the carrying value of DuPonts 6 percent cost basis investment in this venture exceeds its fair value by $37 million, such that an impairment charge was recorded.
38
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
NOTE 6SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Sundry IncomeNet |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Royalty income 1 |
$ | 84 | $ | 170 | $ | 138 | ||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 41 | 83 | 102 | 124 | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of affiliatesnet |
1 | 55 | 99 | 49 | ||||||||||||
Net gain on sales of businesses and other assets 2,3 |
16 | 205 | 435 | 92 | ||||||||||||
Net exchange gains (losses) |
8 | (394 | ) | (106 | ) | 30 | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous income and expensesnet 4 |
24 | 133 | 7 | 257 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Sundry incomenet |
$ | 90 | $ | 166 | $ | 707 | $ | 690 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
In the Successor period, royalty income of $60 million is included in Net Sales. |
2. |
Includes a pre-tax gain of $162 million ( $86 million net of tax) for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 related to the sale of global food safety diagnostics. See Note 4 for additional information. |
3. |
Includes a pre-tax gain of $369 million ( $214 million net of tax) for the year ended December 31, 2016 related to the sale of DuPont (Shenzhen) Manufacturing Limited. See Note 4 for additional information. |
4. |
Miscellaneous income and expensesnet, includes interest items (in the Predecessor period only), gains (losses) on available for sale securities, gains related to litigation settlements, licensing income, gains on purchases, and other items. |
39
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The following table summarizes the impacts of the companys foreign currency hedging program on the companys results of operations. The company routinely uses foreign currency exchange contracts to offset its net exposures, by currency, related to the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities. The objective of this program is to maintain an approximately balanced position in foreign currencies in order to minimize, on an after-tax basis, the effects of exchange rate changes on net monetary asset positions. The hedging program gains (losses) are largely taxable (tax deductible) in the United States (U.S.), whereas the offsetting exchange gains (losses) on the remeasurement of the net monetary asset positions are often not taxable (tax deductible) in their local jurisdictions. The net pre-tax exchange gains (losses) are recorded in sundry incomenet and the related tax impact is recorded in provision for income taxes on continuing operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Subsidiary Monetary Position (Loss) Gain |
||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax exchange (loss) gain |
$ | (83 | ) | $ | 37 | $ | 198 | $ | (404 | ) | ||||||
Local tax (expenses) benefits |
(3 | ) | 217 | (126 | ) | (61 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net after-tax impact from subsidiary exchange (loss) gain |
$ | (86 | ) | $ | 254 | $ | 72 | $ | (465 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Hedging Program Gain (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax exchange gain (loss) |
$ | 91 | $ | (431 | ) | $ | (304 | ) | $ | 434 | ||||||
Tax (expenses) benefits |
(33 | ) | 155 | 110 | (157 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net after-tax impact from hedging program exchange gain (loss) |
$ | 58 | $ | (276 | ) | $ | (194 | ) | $ | 277 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Exchange Gain (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax exchange gain (loss) |
$ | 8 | $ | (394 | ) | $ | (106 | ) | $ | 30 | ||||||
Tax (expenses) benefits |
(36 | ) | 372 | (16 | ) | (218 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net after-tax exchange (loss) gain |
$ | (28 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | (122 | ) | $ | (188 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
Other current assets includes approximately $558 million of restricted cash related to the Rabbi Trust as of December 31, 2017. See Note 16 for additional information.
Accrued and other current liabilities
Accrued and other current liabilities were $4,384 million at December 31, 2017 and $4,650 million at December 31, 2016. Deferred revenue and compensation and other employee-related costs, which are components of accrued and other current liabilities, were $2,014 million and $857 million at December 31, 2017, respectively and $2,217 million and $807 million at December 31, 2016, respectively. No other components of accrued and other current liabilities were more than 5 percent of total current liabilities.
40
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Other noncurrent obligations
Other noncurrent obligations were $1,975 million at December 31, 2017 and $12,304 million at December 31, 2016 . Accrued pension benefit costs and accrued other post employment benefit costs, which are components of other noncurrent obligations in the Predecessor period, were $8,092 million and $2,554 million at December 31, 2016 , respectively. In the Successor period, accrued pension benefit costs and accrued other post employment benefit costs are included in the line item, pension and other post employment benefitsnoncurrent in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 1 for discussion of reclassification adjustments. No other components of other noncurrent obligations were more than 5 percent of total liabilities.
Related Parties
Transactions with DowDuPont
DowDuPont relies on distributions and other intercompany transfers from DuPont and Dow to fund payment of its costs and expenses. In November 2017, DowDuPonts Board of Directors declared a fourth quarter dividend per share of DowDuPont common stock payable on December 15, 2017 and authorized an initial $4,000 million share repurchase program to buy back shares of DowDuPont common stock. In the fourth quarter of 2017, DuPont declared and paid distributions in cash and in-kind to DowDuPont of $829 million, primarily to fund a portion of DowDuPonts fourth quarter share repurchases and dividend payment.
In addition, at December 31, 2017, DuPont had a payable to DowDuPont of $354 million, included in accounts payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to its estimated 2017 tax liability. See Note 7 for additional information.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (The Act) was enacted. The Act reduces the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent , requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax (transition tax) on earnings of foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, creates new provisions related to foreign sourced earnings, eliminates the domestic manufacturing deduction and moves to a territorial system. At December 31, 2017, the company had not completed its accounting for the tax effects of The Act; however, as described below, the company has made a reasonable estimate of the effects on its existing deferred tax balances and the one-time transition tax. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (SAB 118), during the measurement period, income tax effects of the Act may be refined upon obtaining, preparing, or analyzing additional information, and such changes could be material. During the measurement period, provisional amounts may be also be adjusted for the effects, if any, of interpretative guidance issued after December 31, 2017, by U.S. regulatory and standard-setting bodies.
|
As a result of The Act, the company remeasured its U.S. federal deferred income tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21 percent . However, the company is still analyzing certain aspects of The Act and refining its calculations, which could potentially affect the measurement of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts. The provisional amount recorded related to the remeasurement of the companys deferred income tax balance was $(2,716) million and was recorded as a benefit to the provision for income taxes on continuing operations. |
|
The Act requires a mandatory deemed repatriation of post-1986 undistributed foreign earnings and profits (E&P), which results in a one-time transition tax. As a result, the company has recorded a provisional amount for the transition tax liability for its foreign subsidiaries of $715 million, recorded as a charge to the provision for income taxes on continuing operations. The company has not yet |
41
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
completed its calculation of the total post-1986 foreign E&P for its foreign subsidiaries as E&P will not be finalized until the Federal income tax return is filed. Further, the transition tax is based in part on the amount of those earnings held in cash and other specified assets which is a defined term under The Act. |
|
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, The Act introduces new provisions for U.S. taxation of certain global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI). Due to its complexity and a current lack of guidance as to how to calculate the tax, the company is not yet able to determine a reasonable estimate for the impact of the incremental tax liability. When additional guidance is available, the company will make a policy election on whether the additional liability will be recorded in the period in which it is incurred or recognized for the basis differences that would be expected to reverse in future years. |
Geographic Allocation of Income and Provision for Income Taxes |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
Year
Ended 2016 |
Year
Ended 2015 |
||||||||||||
(Loss) Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | (811 | ) | $ | 409 | $ | 1,415 | $ | 1,301 | |||||||
Foreign |
(775 | ) | 1,382 | 1,308 | 721 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Loss) Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | (1,586 | ) | $ | 1,791 | $ | 2,723 | $ | 2,022 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Current tax expense (benefit) |
||||||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 216 | $ | (563 | ) | $ | 4 | $ | 155 | |||||||
State and local |
22 | (11 | ) | 9 | 2 | |||||||||||
Foreign |
187 | 282 | 539 | 420 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total current tax expense (benefit) |
$ | 425 | $ | (292 | ) | $ | 552 | $ | 577 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Deferred tax (benefit) expense |
||||||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | (2,790 | ) | $ | 476 | $ | 22 | $ | 135 | |||||||
State and local |
(48 | ) | (8 | ) | (29 | ) | 4 | |||||||||
Foreign |
(260 | ) | (27 | ) | 96 | (141 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total deferred tax (benefit) expense |
$ | (3,098 | ) | $ | 441 | $ | 89 | $ | (2 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Benefit from) Provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
(2,673 | ) | 149 | 641 | 575 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net Income from continuing operations |
$ | 1,087 | $ | 1,642 | $ | 2,082 | $ | 1,447 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International pre-tax (loss) earnings from continuing operations was $(775) million, $1,382 million, $1,308 million, and $721 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In connection with the Merger, pre-tax earnings from continuing operations for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 includes depreciation and amortization associated with the fair value that was allocated to the companys tangible and intangible assets as well as costs of $1,469 million recognized in cost of goods sold related to the fair value step-up of inventories (See Note 3 and 10 for further information).
The U.S. pre-tax earnings from continuing operations for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 includes transaction costs associated with the Merger and restructuring and asset related charges (which are mostly incurred in the US). These decreases were partially offset by the gain on the sale of the companys food safety diagnostics business in the first quarter 2017.
42
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The increase in pre-tax earnings from continuing operations from 2015 to 2016 is primarily driven by the gain on the sale of DuPont (Shenzhen) Manufacturing Limited in 2016 in addition to the absence of 2015 restructuring and asset related chargesnet.
Reconciliation to U.S. Statutory Rate |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
Year
Ended 2016 |
Year
Ended 2015 |
|||||||||||||
Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate |
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||||||
Equity earning effect |
0.9 | (0.5 | ) | (0.8 | ) | (0.7 | ) | |||||||||
Lower effective tax rates on international operationsnet |
(9.5 | ) | (11.4 | ) | (9.2 | ) | (9.7 | ) | ||||||||
Acquisitions, divestitures and ownership restructuring activities 1, 2 |
15.8 | 5.2 | 1.9 | (0.2 | ) | |||||||||||
U.S. research and development credit |
0.4 | (0.8 | ) | (0.7 | ) | (1.5 | ) | |||||||||
Exchange gains/losses 3 |
(1.8 | ) | (12.9 | ) | 1.9 | 10.2 | ||||||||||
Impact of U.S. Tax Reform |
126.1 | |||||||||||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock compensation 4 |
0.1 | (1.7 | ) | |||||||||||||
Tax settlements and expiration of statute of limitations 5 |
| (3.8 | ) | (1.1 | ) | (1.5 | ) | |||||||||
Othernet |
1.5 | (0.8 | ) | (3.5 | ) | (3.2 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Effective tax rate |
168.5 | % | 8.3 | % | 23.5 | % | 28.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
See Notes 3 and 4 for additional information. |
2. |
Includes a net tax benefit of $261 million related to an internal legal entity restructuring associated with the Intended Business Separations. |
3. |
Principally reflects the impact of foreign exchange gains and losses on net monetary assets for which no corresponding tax impact is realized. Further information about the companys foreign currency hedging program is included in Note 6 and Note 18 under the heading Foreign Currency Risk. |
4. |
Reflects the impact of the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-09, which resulted in the recognition of excess tax benefits related to equity compensation in the (benefit from) provision for income taxes on continuing operations. See Note 2 for additional information. |
5. |
The period January 1 through August 31, 2017 includes a tax benefit of $53 million for accrued interest reversals (recorded in sundry incomenet). |
Deferred Tax Balances at December 31 |
2017 (Successor) | 2016 (Predecessor) | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | ||||||||||||
Property |
$ | | $ | 1,160 | $ | | $ | 742 | ||||||||
Tax loss and credit carryforwards |
1,690 | | 1,808 | | ||||||||||||
Accrued employee benefits |
1,988 | 68 | 4,529 | 410 | ||||||||||||
Other accruals and reserves |
333 | 39 | 617 | 222 | ||||||||||||
Intangibles |
284 | 6,286 | 210 | 1,345 | ||||||||||||
Inventory |
130 | 597 | 163 | 138 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
109 | | | | ||||||||||||
Investments |
23 | 453 | 126 | 230 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized exchange gains/losses |
| 71 | | 346 | ||||||||||||
Othernet |
260 | 121 | 257 | 86 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 4,817 | $ | 8,795 | $ | 7,710 | $ | 3,519 | ||||||||
Valuation allowances |
(1,378 | ) | | (1,308 | ) | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,439 | $ | 8,795 | $ | 6,402 | $ | 3,519 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net Deferred Tax (Liability) Asset |
$ | (5,356 | ) | $ | 2,883 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Operating Loss and Tax Credit Carryforwards |
Deferred Tax Asset | |||||||
(In millions) |
2017
(Successor) |
2016
(Predecessor) |
||||||
Operating loss carryforwards |
||||||||
Expire within 5 years |
$ | 42 | $ | 41 | ||||
Expire after 5 years or indefinite expiration |
1,483 | 1,482 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total operating loss carryforwards |
$ | 1,525 | $ | 1,523 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Tax credit carryforwards |
||||||||
Expire within 5 years |
$ | 10 | $ | 10 | ||||
Expire after 5 years or indefinite expiration |
155 | 275 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total tax credit carryforwards |
$ | 165 | $ | 285 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Operating Loss and Tax Credit Carryforwards |
$ | 1,690 | $ | 1,808 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Total Gross Unrecognized Tax Benefits |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
Year
Ended 2016 |
Year
Ended 2015 |
||||||||||||
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of beginning of period |
$ | 436 | $ | 348 | $ | 558 | $ | 735 | ||||||||
Decreases related to positions taken on items from prior years |
(2 | ) | (19 | ) | (41 | ) | (98 | ) | ||||||||
Increases related to positions taken on items from prior years |
9 | 3 | 32 | 13 | ||||||||||||
Increases related to positions taken in the current year |
19 | 19 | 32 | 32 | ||||||||||||
Settlement of uncertain tax positions with tax authorities |
1 | (6 | ) | (205 | ) | (58 | ) | |||||||||
Decreases due to expiration of statutes of limitations |
(5 | ) | (81 | ) | (30 | ) | (30 | ) | ||||||||
Exchange loss (gain) |
1 | 1 | 2 | (36 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrecognized tax benefits as of end of period |
$ | 459 | $ | 265 | $ | 348 | $ | 558 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate |
$ | 76 | $ | 188 | $ | 253 | $ | 386 | ||||||||
Total amount of interest and penalties (benefit) recognized in Provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
$ | 1 | $ | (27 | ) | $ | 10 | $ | (14 | ) | ||||||
Total accrual for interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits |
$ | 25 | $ | 22 | $ | 71 | $ | 88 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each year the company files hundreds of tax returns in the various national, state and local income taxing jurisdictions in which it operates. These tax returns are subject to examination and possible challenge by the tax authorities. Positions challenged by the tax authorities may be settled or appealed by the company. As a result, there is an uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the companys financial statements in accordance with accounting for income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. It is reasonably possible that changes to the companys global unrecognized tax benefits could be significant; however, due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of completion of audits and possible outcomes, a current estimate of the range of increases or decreases that may occur within the next twelve months cannot be made.
44
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Tax years that remain subject to examination for the companys major tax jurisdictions are shown below:
Tax Years Subject to Examination by Major Tax Jurisdiction at Dec 31, |
Earliest
Open Year |
|||
Jurisdiction |
||||
Brazil |
2012 | |||
Canada |
2011 | |||
China |
2014 | |||
Denmark |
2003 | |||
Germany |
2006 | |||
India |
2001 | |||
The Netherlands |
2014 | |||
Switzerland |
2012 | |||
United States: |
||||
Federal income tax |
2012 | |||
State and local income tax |
2004 |
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and related companies that are deemed to be permanently invested amounted to $15,408 million at December 31, 2017, $17,380 million at December 31, 2016 and $16,053 million at December 31, 2015. The Act imposed U.S. tax on all foreign unrepatriated earnings. These undistributed earnings are still subject to certain taxes upon repatriation, primarily foreign withholding taxes. It is not practicable to calculate the unrecognized deferred tax liability on undistributed earnings.
DuPont and its subsidiaries are included in DowDuPonts consolidated federal income tax group and consolidated tax return. Generally, the consolidated tax liability of the DowDuPont U.S. tax group for each year will be apportioned among the members of the consolidated group based on each members separate taxable income. DuPont and Dow intend that to the extent Federal and/or State corporate income tax liabilities are reduced through the utilization of tax attributes of the other, settlement of any receivable and payable generated from the use of the other partys sub-group attributes will be in accordance with a tax sharing agreement and/or tax matters agreement.
NOTE 8EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
Upon completion of the Merger, each share of DuPont Common Stock was converted into the right to receive 1.2820 fully paid and non-assessable shares of DowDuPont Common Stock, in addition to cash in lieu of any fractional shares of DowDuPont Common Stock issued and therefore earnings per share of common stock information is not presented for the Successor period.
45
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Set forth below is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the Predecessor periods indicated below:
Predecessor | ||||||||||||
(In millions, except share amounts) |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
|||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes attributable to DuPont |
$ | 1,624 | $ | 2,072 | $ | 1,443 | ||||||
Preferred dividends |
(7 | ) | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes available to DuPont common stockholders |
$ | 1,617 | $ | 2,062 | $ | 1,433 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income from discontinued operations after income taxes available to DuPont common stockholders |
117 | 441 | 510 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 1,734 | $ | 2,503 | $ | 1,943 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstandingBasic |
867,888,000 | 872,560,000 | 893,992,000 | |||||||||
Dilutive effect of the companys employee compensation plans 1 |
4,532,000 | 4,476,000 | 5,535,000 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstandingDiluted 1 |
872,420,000 | 877,036,000 | 899,527,000 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Diluted earnings per share considers the impact of potentially dilutive securities except in periods in which there is a loss because the inclusion of the potential common shares would have an anti-dilutive effect. |
The following average number of stock options were antidilutive, and therefore not included in the dilutive earnings per share calculations:
Predecessor | ||||||||||||
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||
Average number of stock options |
1,906 | 4,794,000 | 4,715,000 |
46
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
NOTE 9ACCOUNTS AND NOTES RECEIVABLE, NET
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||
(In millions) |
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
||||||
Accounts receivabletrade 1 |
$ | 3,777 | $ | 3,601 | ||||
Notes receivabletrade 2 |
199 | 206 | ||||||
Other 3 |
1,263 | 1,152 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total accounts and notes receivablenet |
$ | 5,239 | $ | 4,959 | ||||
|
|
|
|
1. |
Accounts receivabletrade is net of allowances of $10 million at December 31, 2017 and $287 million at December 31, 2016. Allowances are equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts. That estimate is based on historical collection experience, current economic and market conditions, and review of the current status of customers accounts. |
2. |
Notes receivabletrade primarily consists of receivables within the agriculture product line for deferred payment loan programs for the sale of seed products to customers. These loans have terms of one year or less and are primarily concentrated in North America. The company maintains a rigid pre-approval process for extending credit to customers in order to manage overall risk and exposure associated with credit losses. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no significant past due notes receivable, nor were there any significant impairments related to current loan agreements. |
3. |
Other includes receivables in relation to fair value of derivative instruments, indemnification assets, value added tax, general sales tax and other taxes. No individual group represents more than ten percent of total receivables. |
Accounts and notes receivable are carried at amounts that approximate fair value.
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||
(In millions) |
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
||||||
Finished products |
$ | 4,500 | $ | 2,961 | ||||
Semi-finished products |
2,769 | 1,877 | ||||||
Raw materials |
371 | 292 | ||||||
Stores and supplies |
447 | 398 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 8,087 | $ | 5,528 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Adjustment of inventories to a LIFO basis |
546 | (178 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total inventories |
$ | 8,633 | $ | 5,350 | ||||
|
|
|
|
As a result of the Merger, a fair value step-up of $3,842 million was recorded for inventories. Of this amount, $1,434 million has been recognized in costs of goods sold within loss from continuing operations for the period September 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. See Note 3 for additional information regarding the Merger.
47
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
NOTE 11PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||
(In millions) |
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
||||||
Land and land improvements |
$ | 913 | $ | 501 | ||||
Buildings |
2,747 | 4,224 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
8,104 | 16,909 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
1,114 | 1,381 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total property, plant and equipment |
12,878 | 23,015 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(443 | ) | (14,164 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total property, plant and equipmentnet |
$ | 12,435 | $ | 8,851 | ||||
|
|
|
|
As a result of the Merger, a fair value step-up of $3,200 million was recorded for property, plant and equipment. See Note 3 for additional information regarding the Merger.
Buildings, machinery and equipment and land improvements are depreciated over useful lives on a straight-line basis ranging from 1 to 25 years. Capitalizable costs associated with computer software for internal use are amortized on a straight-line basis over 1 to 8 years.
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Depreciation expense |
$ | 426 | $ | 589 | $ | 907 | $ | 948 |
NOTE 12GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The following table summarizes changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 , the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 , and the year ended December 31, 2016:
(In millions) |
||||
Balance as of December 31, 2015 ( Predecessor ) |
$ | 4,238 | ||
Currency Translation Adjustment |
(68 | ) | ||
Other Goodwill Adjustments and Acquisitions |
(1 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Balance as of December 31, 2016 ( Predecessor ) |
4,169 | |||
Currency Translation Adjustment |
176 | |||
Other Goodwill Adjustments and Acquisitions |
198 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance as of August 31, 2017 ( Predecessor ) |
$ | 4,543 | ||
|
|
|||
Balance at September 1, 2017 ( Successor ) |
$ | 45,105 | ||
Currency Translation Adjustment |
(234 | ) | ||
Goodwill Recognized for H&N Acquisition |
718 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance as of December 31, 2017 ( Successor ) |
$ | 45,589 | ||
|
|
48
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
In 2017 and 2016, the company performed impairment tests for goodwill and determined that no goodwill impairments existed.
Other Intangible Assets
The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets by major class are as follows:
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross |
Accumulated
Amortization |
Net | Gross |
Accumulated
Amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization (Definite-lived): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer-related |
$ | 9,502 | $ | (186 | ) | $ | 9,316 | $ | 1,574 | $ | (586 | ) | $ | 988 | ||||||||||
Developed technology |
4,364 | (144 | ) | 4,220 | 1,410 | (838 | ) | 572 | ||||||||||||||||
Trademarks/trade names |
1,117 | (26 | ) | 1,091 | 53 | (15 | ) | 38 | ||||||||||||||||
Favorable supply contracts 1 |
495 | (17 | ) | 478 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Microbial cell factories 2 |
397 | (6 | ) | 391 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other 3 |
459 | (10 | ) | 449 | 171 | (82 | ) | 89 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other intangible assets with finite lives |
16,334 | (389 | ) | 15,945 | 3,208 | (1,521 | ) | 1,687 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Intangible assets not subject to amortization (Indefinite-lived): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
In-process research and development (IPR&D) |
660 | | 660 | 73 | | 73 | ||||||||||||||||||
Microbial cell factories 2 |
306 | | 306 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Germplasm 4 |
6,265 | | 6,265 | 1,053 | | 1,053 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks / trade names |
4,856 | | 4,856 | 545 | | 545 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other intangible assets |
11,781 | | 11,781 | 1,977 | | 1,977 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 28,115 | $ | (389 | ) | $ | 27,726 | $ | 5,185 | $ | (1,521 | ) | $ | 3,664 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Upon closing and pursuant to the terms of the FMC Transaction Agreement, DuPont entered into favorable supply contracts with FMC. DuPont recorded these contracts as intangible assets recognized at the fair value of off-market contracts. Refer to Notes 3 and 4 for additional information. |
2. |
Microbial cell factories, derived from natural microbes, are used to sustainably produce enzymes, peptides and chemicals using natural metabolic processes. The company recognized the microbial cell factories as intangible assets upon the acquisition of Danisco. As a result of the valuation as part of the Merger, it was determined that this intangible asset now has a definite life and therefore it has been moved from indefinite-lived to definite-lived as of September 1, 2017. |
3. |
Primarily consists of sales and farmer networks, marketing and manufacturing alliances and noncompetition agreements. |
4. |
Pioneer germplasm is the pool of genetic source material and body of knowledge gained from the development and delivery stage of plant breeding. The company recognized germplasm as an intangible asset upon the acquisition of Pioneer. This intangible asset is expected to contribute to cash flows beyond the foreseeable future and there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, or other factors which limit its useful life. |
49
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
In connection with the Merger, the company recorded $27,221 million of intangible assets, as shown in the table below, representing the preliminary fair values at the Merger date. See Note 3 for additional information regarding the Merger.
Intangible Assets (In millions) |
Gross
Carrying Amount |
Weighted-
average Amortization Period (years) |
||||||
Intangible assets with finite lives: |
||||||||
Customer-related |
$ | 9,264 | 17 | |||||
Developed technology |
4,239 | 12 | ||||||
Trademarks/trade names |
1,080 | 15 | ||||||
Microbial cell factories |
400 | 23 | ||||||
Other |
453 | 17 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total other intangible assets with finite lives |
$ | 15,436 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Intangible assets with indefinite lives: |
||||||||
IPR&D |
$ | 660 | ||||||
Germplasm |
6,263 | |||||||
Trademarks/trade names |
4,862 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total intangible assets |
$ | 27,221 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
The aggregate pre-tax amortization expense from continuing operations for definite-lived intangible assets was $389 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 and $139 million for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017. The aggregate pre-tax amortization expense from continuing operations for definite-lived intangible assets was $319 million and $362 million for 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Total estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years is as follows:
(In millions) |
||||
2018 |
$ | 1,266 | ||
2019 |
$ | 1,254 | ||
2020 |
$ | 1,244 | ||
2021 |
$ | 1,228 | ||
2022 |
$ | 1,221 |
NOTE 13SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, LONG-TERM DEBT AND AVAILABLE CREDIT FACILITIES
The following tables summarize the companys short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations and long-term debt:
Short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||
(In millions) |
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
||||||
Commercial paper |
$ | 1,436 | $ | 386 | ||||
Other loansvarious currencies |
28 | 39 | ||||||
Long-term debt payable within one year |
1,315 | 4 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations |
$ | 2,779 | $ | 429 | ||||
|
|
|
|
50
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The estimated fair value of the companys short-term borrowings, including interest rate financial instruments, was determined using Level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy, as described in Note 1 and Note 19. Based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues, or on current rates offered to the company for debt of the same remaining maturities, the fair value of the companys short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations was $2,780 million and $430 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The weighted-average interest rate on short-term borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 1.8 percent and 2.2 percent , respectively. The decrease in the interest rate for 2017 was primarily due to lower effective interest on long-term debt payable within one year.
Long Term Debt |
Successor 1 | Predecessor | ||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||
(In millions) |
Amount |
Weighted Average
Rate |
Amount | |||||||||
Promissory notes and debentures: |
||||||||||||
Final maturity 2018 |
$ | 1,280 | 1.59 | % | $ | 1,290 | ||||||
Final maturity 2019 |
521 | 2.23 | % | 500 | ||||||||
Final maturity 2020 |
3,070 | 1.79 | % | 999 | ||||||||
Final maturity 2021 |
1,580 | 2.07 | % | 1,498 | ||||||||
Final maturity 2023 and thereafter |
3,492 | 3.32 | % | 3,188 | ||||||||
Other facilities: |
||||||||||||
Term loan due 2019 |
1,500 | 2.35 | % | 500 | ||||||||
Other loans |
18 | 4.32 | % | 22 | ||||||||
Foreign currency loans, various rates and maturities |
30 | 2.85 | % | 29 | ||||||||
Medium-term notes, varying maturities through 2043 |
110 | 1.22 | % | 111 | ||||||||
Capital lease obligations |
5 | 9 | ||||||||||
Less: Unamortized debt discount and issuance costs |
| 35 | ||||||||||
Less: Long-term debt due within one year |
1,315 | 4 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 10,291 | $ | 8,107 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
The Successor period includes the reflection of debt at fair value at the date of the Merger. See Note 3 for additional information regarding the Merger. |
Principal payments of long-term debt for the next five years are as follows:
Maturities of Long-Term Debt For Next Five Years 1 (In millions) |
||||
2018 |
$ | 1,286 | ||
2019 |
$ | 2,005 | ||
2020 |
$ | 3,005 | ||
2021 |
$ | 1,505 | ||
2022 |
$ | 2 |
1. |
Excludes unamortized debt step-up premium. |
The estimated fair value of the companys long-term borrowings, was determined using Level 2 inputs within the fair value hierarchy, as described in Note 1 and Note 19. Based on quoted market prices for the same or similar issues, or on current rates offered to the company for debt of the same remaining maturities, the fair value of the companys long-term borrowings, not including long-term debt due within one year, was $10,250 million and $8,460 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
51
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Available Committed Credit Facilities
The following table summarizes the companys credit facilities:
Committed and Available Credit Facilities at December 31, 2017 (Successor) |
||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Effective Date |
Committed
Credit |
Credit
Available |
Maturity Date |
Interest |
|||||||||
Revolving Credit Facility |
March 2016 | $ | 3,000 | $ | 2,950 | May 2019 | Floating Rate | |||||||
Term Loan Facility |
March 2016 | 4,500 | 3,000 | March 2019 | Floating Rate | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total Committed and Available Credit Facilities |
$ | 7,500 | $ | 5,950 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Debt Offering
In May 2017, the company completed an underwritten public offering of $1,250 million of the companys 2.20 percent Notes due 2020 and $750 million of the companys Floating Rate Notes due 2020 (the May 2017 Debt Offering). The proceeds of this offering were used to make a discretionary pension contribution to the companys principal U.S. pension plan. See Note 16 for further discussion regarding this contribution.
Term Loan Facility
In March 2016, the company entered into a credit agreement that provides for a three -year, senior unsecured term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $4,500 million (the Term Loan Facility) under which DuPont may make up to seven term loan borrowings and amounts repaid or prepaid are not available for subsequent borrowings. The facility was amended in 2017 to extend the date on which the commitment to lend terminates to July 27, 2018. The proceeds from the borrowings under the Term Loan Facility will be used for the companys general corporate purposes including debt repayment, working capital and funding a portion of DowDuPonts costs and expenses. The Term Loan Facility matures in March 2019 at which time all outstanding borrowings, including accrued but unpaid interest, become immediately due and payable. As of December 31, 2017, the company had made three term loan borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of $1,500 million and had unused commitments of $3,000 million under the Term Loan Facility.
Uncommitted Credit Facilities and Outstanding Letters of Credit
Unused bank credit lines on uncommitted credit facilities were approximately $731 million at December 31, 2017. These lines are available to support short-term liquidity needs and general corporate purposes including letters of credit. Outstanding letters of credit were $177 million at December 31, 2017. These letters of credit support commitments made in the ordinary course of business.
NOTE 14COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Guarantees
Indemnifications
In connection with acquisitions and divestitures as of December 31, 2017, the company has indemnified respective parties against certain liabilities that may arise in connection with these transactions and business activities prior to the completion of the transactions. The term of these indemnifications, which typically pertain to environmental, tax and product liabilities, is generally indefinite. In addition, the company indemnifies its duly elected or appointed directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, against liabilities
52
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
incurred as a result of their activities for the company, such as adverse judgments relating to litigation matters. If the indemnified party were to incur a liability or have a liability increase as a result of a successful claim, pursuant to the terms of the indemnification, the company would be required to reimburse the indemnified party. The maximum amount of potential future payments is generally unlimited.
Obligations for Equity Affiliates & Others
The company has directly guaranteed various debt obligations under agreements with third parties related to equity affiliates, customers and suppliers. At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the company had directly guaranteed $297 million and $388 million, respectively, of such obligations. These amounts represent the maximum potential amount of future (undiscounted) payments that the company could be required to make under the guarantees. The company would be required to perform on these guarantees in the event of default by the guaranteed party.
The company assesses the payment/performance risk by assigning default rates based on the duration of the guarantees. These default rates are assigned based on the external credit rating of the counterparty or through internal credit analysis and historical default history for counterparties that do not have published credit ratings. For counterparties without an external rating or available credit history, a cumulative average default rate is used.
In certain cases, the company has recourse to assets held as collateral, as well as personal guarantees from customers and suppliers. Assuming liquidation, these assets are estimated to cover approximately 23 percent of the $89 million of guaranteed obligations of customers and suppliers. Set forth below are the companys guaranteed obligations at December 31, 2017.
The following tables provide a summary of the final expiration and maximum future payments for each type of guarantee:
Guarantees at December 31, 2017 (Successor) (In millions) |
Final Expiration |
Maximum
Future Payments |
||||||
Obligations for customers and suppliers 1 : |
||||||||
Bank borrowings |
2022 | $ | 89 | |||||
Obligations for non-consolidated affiliates 2 : |
||||||||
Bank borrowings |
2018 | 161 | ||||||
Obligations for Chemours 3 : |
||||||||
Chemours purchase obligations |
2018 | 10 | ||||||
Residual value guarantees 4 |
2029 | 37 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total guarantees |
$ | 297 | ||||||
|
|
1. |
Existing guarantees for customers and suppliers, as part of contractual agreements. |
2. |
Existing guarantees for non-consolidated affiliates liquidity needs in normal operations. |
3. |
Guarantee for Chemours raw material purchase obligations under agreement with third party supplier. |
4. |
The company provides guarantees related to leased assets specifying the residual value that will be available to the lessor at lease termination through sale of the assets to the lessee or third parties. |
Operating Leases
The company uses various leased facilities and equipment in its operations. The terms for these leased assets vary depending on the lease agreement.
53
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Future minimum lease payments (including residual value guarantee amounts) under non-cancelable operating leases are $264 million, $190 million, $137 million, $104 million and $81 million for the years 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively, and $268 million for subsequent years and are not reduced by non-cancelable minimum sublease rentals due in the future in the amount of $3 million. Net rental expense under operating leases was $105 million, $179 million, $242 million and $266 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Litigation
The company is subject to various legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of its current and former business operations, including product liability, intellectual property, commercial, environmental and antitrust lawsuits. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these various proceedings. Although considerable uncertainty exists, management does not anticipate that the ultimate disposition of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the companys results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity. However, the ultimate liabilities could be material to results of operations in the period recognized.
PFOA
DuPont used PFOA (collectively, perfluorooctanoic acids and its salts, including the ammonium salt), as a processing aid to manufacture some fluoropolymer resins at various sites around the world including its Washington Works plant in West Virginia. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement discussed in Note 4, the company is indemnified by Chemours for the PFOA matters discussed below and has recorded a total indemnification asset of $15 million.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and New Jersey department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP)
DuPont is obligated under agreements with EPA, including a 2009 consent decree to which Chemours was added in 2017, and has made voluntary commitments to NJDEP. These obligations and voluntary commitments include surveying, sampling and testing drinking water in and around certain company sites and offering treatment or an alternative supply of drinking water if tests indicate the presence of PFOA in drinking water at or greater than the national health advisory level established from time to time by the EPA. At December 31, 2017, the company had an accrual of $15 million related to these obligations and voluntary commitments. The company recorded an indemnification asset corresponding to the accrual balance at December 31, 2017.
Leach v. DuPont
In August 2001, a class action, captioned Leach v. DuPont, was filed in West Virginia state court alleging that residents living near the Washington Works facility had suffered, or may suffer, deleterious health effects from exposure to PFOA in drinking water. A settlement was reached in 2004 that binds approximately 80,000 residents, (the Leach Settlement.) In addition to paying $23 million to plaintiffs attorneys for fees and expenses and $70 million to fund a community health project, the company is obligated to fund up to $235 million for a medical monitoring program for eligible class members and to pay administrative costs and fees associated with the program. In January 2012, the company put $1 million into an escrow account to fund medical monitoring as required by the settlement agreement. As of December 31, 2017, less than $1 million has been disbursed from the account. The company also must continue to provide water treatment designed to reduce the level of PFOA in water to six area water districts, including the Little Hocking Water Association, and private well users. While it is probable that the company will incur liabilities related to funding the medical monitoring program and providing water treatment, the company does not expect any such liabilities to be material.
54
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Under the Leach Settlement, the company funded a series of health studies which were completed in October 2012 by an independent science panel of experts (the C8 Science Panel.) The C8 Science Panel found probable links, as defined in the Leach Settlement, between exposure to PFOA and pregnancy-induced hypertension, including preeclampsia; kidney cancer; testicular cancer; thyroid disease; ulcerative colitis; and diagnosed high cholesterol.
Multi-District Litigation
Leach class members may pursue personal injury claims against DuPont only for the six human diseases for which the C8 Science Panel determined a probable link exists. Following the Leach Settlement, approximately 3,550 lawsuits alleging personal injury claims were filed in various federal and state courts in Ohio and West Virginia. These lawsuits are consolidated in multi-district litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
In the first quarter of 2017, the MDL was settled for $670.7 million in cash (the MDL Settlement), half of which was to be paid by Chemours and half paid by DuPont. At December 31, 2017, all payments under the settlement agreement have been made by both companies. DuPonts payment is not subject to indemnification or reimbursement by Chemours. In exchange for that payment, DuPont and Chemours receive releases of all claims by the settling plaintiffs. The MDL Settlement was entered into solely by way of compromise and settlement and is not in any way an admission of liability or fault by DuPont or Chemours. All of the MDL plaintiffs participated and resolved their claims within the MDL Settlement.
New Items
At December 31, 2017, five lawsuits had been filed against the company in West Virginia and four in Ohio alleging personal injury from exposure to PFOA in drinking water.
In addition, three lawsuits are pending in federal court in New York on behalf of five individuals who are residents of Hoosick Falls, New York. The plaintiffs claim personal injuries, including kidney cancer, thyroid disease and ulcerative colitis, from alleged exposure to PFOA discharged into the air and water from nearby manufacturing facilities owned and operated by defendant third parties. Plaintiffs claim that PFOA used at the facilities was purchased from or manufactured by the company and co-defendant, 3M Company. An action is pending in Alabama state court filed by a municipal water utility. The plaintiff alleges contamination from wastewater from defendant carpet manufacturers operations using perfluorinated chemicals and compounds, including PFOA, (PFCs). Plaintiff alleges that the PFCs used in defendant manufacturers operations were supplied by the company and co-defendant 3M Company.
While it is reasonably possible that the company could incur liabilities related to these actions, it does not expect any such liabilities would be material. Chemours is defending and indemnifying the company in these matters in accordance with the amendment to the Separation Agreement discussed below.
Amendment to Separation Agreement
Concurrent with the MDL Settlement, DuPont and Chemours amended the Separation Agreement to provide for a limited sharing of potential future PFOA liabilities (i.e., indemnifiable losses, as defined in the Separation Agreement) for a period of five years beginning July 6, 2017. During that five-year period, Chemours will annually pay future PFOA liabilities up to $25 million and, if such amount is exceeded, DuPont would pay any excess amount up to the next $25 million (which payment will not be subject to indemnification by Chemours), with Chemours annually bearing any further excess liabilities. After the five-year period, this limited sharing
55
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
agreement will expire, and Chemours indemnification obligations under the Separation Agreement will continue unchanged. There have been no charges incurred by DuPont under this arrangement through December 31, 2017. Chemours has also agreed that it will not contest its liability to DuPont under the Separation Agreement for PFOA liabilities on the basis of ostensible defenses generally applicable to the indemnification provisions under the Separation Agreement, including defenses relating to punitive damages, fines or penalties or attorneys fees, and waives any such defenses with respect to PFOA liabilities. Chemours has, however, retained defenses as to whether any particular PFOA claim is within the scope of the indemnification provisions of the Separation Agreement.
It is possible that new lawsuits could be filed against DuPont related to PFOA that may not be within the scope of the MDL Settlement. Any such new litigation would be subject to indemnification by Chemours under the Separation Agreement, as amended.
Fayetteville Works Facility, North Carolina
Prior to the separation of Chemours, the company introduced GenX as a polymerization processing aid and a replacement for PFOA at the Fayetteville Works facility. The facility is now owned and operated by Chemours which continues to manufacture and use GenX. Chemours is responding to ongoing inquiries and investigations from federal, state and local investigators, regulators and other governmental authorities as well as inquiries from the media and local community stakeholders. These inquiries and investigations involve the discharge of GenX and certain similar compounds from the Chemours facility at Fayetteville Works into the Cape Fear River in Bladen County, North Carolina.
In August 2017, the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina served the company with a subpoena for testimony and the production of documents to a grand jury. In the fourth quarter 2017, DuPont was served with additional subpoenas relating to the same issue. The subpoenas seek documents and testimony related to alleged discharges of PFOA and/or GenX from the Fayetteville Works facility into the Cape Fear River. It is possible that these ongoing inquiries and investigations, including the grand jury subpoena, could result in penalties or sanctions, or that additional litigation will be instituted against Chemours and/or the company.
At December 31, 2017, several actions, filed on behalf of putative classes of property owners and residents in areas near or who draw drinking water from the Cape Fear River, are pending in federal court against Chemours, the company and one also names DowDuPont. These actions relate to the alleged discharge of certain perflourinated chemicals into the river from the operations and wastewater treatment at the Fayetteville Works facility. The three purported class actions, filed in the fourth quarter 2017 and now consolidated into a single purported class action, seek various relief including medical monitoring, property damages and injunctive relief. Separate actions pending at December 31, 2017 were filed by the Cape Fear Public Utility Authority and Brunswick County, NC seeking actual and punitive damages as well as injunctive relief. These actions have since been consolidated and two additional North Carolina water authorities have joined the action. Management believes the probability of loss with respect to these actions is remote.
The company has an indemnification claim against Chemours with respect to current and future inquiries and claims, including lawsuits, related to the foregoing. At December 31, 2017, Chemours is defending and indemnifying the company in the pending civil actions.
Environmental
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. At
56
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2017, the company had accrued obligations of $433 million for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs, including $67 million for the remediation of Superfund sites. These obligations are included in Accrued and other current liabilities and Other noncurrent obligations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This is managements best estimate of the costs for remediation and restoration with respect to environmental matters for which the company has accrued liabilities, although it is reasonably possible that the ultimate cost with respect to these particular matters could range up to $920 million above the amount accrued at December 31, 2017. Consequently, it is reasonably possible that environmental remediation and restoration costs in excess of amounts accrued could have a material impact on the companys results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. It is the opinion of the companys management, however, that the possibility is remote that costs in excess of the range disclosed will have a material impact on the companys results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Inherent uncertainties exist in these estimates primarily due to unknown conditions, changing governmental regulations and legal standards regarding liability, and emerging remediation technologies for handling site remediation and restoration. At December 31, 2016, the company had accrued obligations of $457 million for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs, including $50 million for the remediation of Superfund sites.
Pursuant to the DuPont and Chemours Separation Agreement, the company is indemnified by Chemours for certain environmental matters, included in the liability of $433 million, that have an estimated liability of $242 million as of December 31, 2017, and a potential exposure that ranges up to approximately $430 million above the amount accrued. As such, the company has recorded an indemnification asset of $242 million corresponding to the companys accrual balance related to these matters at December 31, 2017, including $47 million related to the Superfund sites.
Share Repurchase Program
2015 Share Buyback Plan
In the first quarter 2015, DuPont announced its intention to buy back shares of about $4,000 million using the distribution proceeds received from Chemours. In connection with the completion of the spin-off of Chemours, the Board of Directors authorized the use of the distribution proceeds to buy back shares of the companys common stock as follows: $2,000 million to be purchased and retired by December 31, 2015, which was completed during 2015, with the remainder to be purchased and retired by December 31, 2016. There were no share repurchases under this plan in the first and second quarters of 2016. The company had limited opportunity to repurchase shares in 2016, primarily due to the planned merger with Dow. However, during the second half of 2016, the company purchased and retired 13.2 million shares in the open market for a total cost of $916 million. As of December 31, 2016, in aggregate, the company paid $2,916 million and received and retired 48.2 million shares. The authorization under this buyback program expired as of January 1, 2017.
2014 Share Buyback Plan
In January 2014, the companys Board of Directors authorized a $5,000 million share buyback plan that replaced the 2011 plan. During 2015, the company repurchased and retired 4.6 million shares in the open market for a total cost of $353 million . There were no share repurchases under this plan during 2016 and 2017. The authorization under this buyback program expired upon Merger. As of August 31, 2017, in aggregate, the company purchased 34.7 million shares at a total cost of $2,353 million under the plan.
Treasury Stock
Immediately prior to the closing of the Merger Transaction, all 87 million shares of DuPont common stock that were held in treasury were automatically canceled and retired for no consideration. Common stock held in
57
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
treasury was recorded at cost. When retired, the excess of the cost of treasury stock over its par value was allocated between retained earnings ( $5,657 million ) and additional paid-in capital ( $1,044 million ).
Set forth below is a reconciliation of common stock share activity for the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015 :
Shares of common stock |
Issued |
Held In
Treasury |
||||||
Balance January 1, 2015 (Predecessor) |
992,020,000 | (87,041,000 | ) | |||||
Issued |
5,932,000 | | ||||||
Repurchased |
| (39,564,000 | ) | |||||
Retired |
(39,564,000 | ) | 39,564,000 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance December 31, 2015 (Predecessor) |
958,388,000 | (87,041,000 | ) | |||||
Issued |
4,808,000 | | ||||||
Repurchased |
| (13,152,000 | ) | |||||
Retired |
(13,152,000 | ) | 13,152,000 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance December 31, 2016 (Predecessor) |
950,044,000 | (87,041,000 | ) | |||||
Issued |
5,335,000 | | ||||||
Retired |
(87,041,000 | ) | 87,041,000 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance August 31, 2017 (Predecessor) |
868,338,000 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance September 1 and December 31, 2017 (Successor) 1 |
100 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
1. |
All of the companys issued and outstanding common stock at September 1, 2017 is held by the DowDuPont Inc. |
58
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The changes and after-tax balances of components comprising accumulated other comprehensive loss are summarized below:
(In millions) |
Cumulative
Translation Adjustment 1 |
Derivative
Instruments |
Pension Benefit
Plans 2 |
Other Benefit
Plans |
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on Investments |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2015 (Predecessor) |
$ | (919 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | (7,895 | ) | $ | 262 | $ | 2 | $ | (8,556 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications |
(1,605 | ) | (25 | ) | 39 | 3 | (17 | ) | (1,605 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
| 7 | 535 | (243 | ) | (2 | ) | 297 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive (loss) income |
(1,605 | ) | (18 | ) | 574 | (240 | ) | (19 | ) | (1,308 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Spin-off of Chemours |
$ | 191 | $ | | $ | 278 | $ | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 468 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2015 (Predecessor) |
$ | (2,333 | ) | $ | (24 | ) | $ | (7,043 | ) | $ | 22 | $ | (18 | ) | $ | (9,396 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
2016 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications |
(510 | ) | 20 | (271 | ) | (81 | ) | (8 | ) | (850 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
| 11 | 594 | (298 | ) | 28 | 335 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive (loss) income |
(510 | ) | 31 | 323 | (379 | ) | 20 | (515 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2016 (Predecessor) |
$ | (2,843 | ) | $ | 7 | $ | (6,720 | ) | $ | (357 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | (9,911 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
2017 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications |
1,042 | 3 | (78 | ) | | 1 | 968 | |||||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
| (13 | ) | 325 | 10 | (1 | ) | 321 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) |
1,042 | (10 | ) | 247 | 10 | | 1,289 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance August 31, 2017 (Predecessor) |
$ | (1,801 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (6,473 | ) | $ | (347 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | (8,622 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance September 1, 2017 (Successor) 3 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications |
(454 | ) | (2 | ) | 128 | (53 | ) | | (381 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive (loss) income |
(454 | ) | (2 | ) | 128 | (53 | ) | | (381 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance December 31, 2017 (Successor) |
$ | (454 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 128 | $ | (53 | ) | $ | | $ | (381 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
The cumulative translation adjustment loss for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 is primarily driven by the strengthening of the U.S dollar (USD) against the European Euro (EUR) and the Brazilian real (BRL). The cumulative translation adjustment gain for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 is primarily driven by the weakening of the USD against the EUR. The currency translation loss for the year ended December 31, 2016 is primarily driven by the strengthening of the USD against the EUR partially offset by the weakening of the USD against the BRL. The currency translation loss for the year ended December 31, 2015 is driven by the strengthening USD against primarily the EUR and BRL. |
2. |
The Pension Benefit Plans loss recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income during the year ended December 31, 2016 includes the impact of the remeasurement of the principal U.S. pension plan as of June 30, 2016. See Note 16 for additional information. |
3. |
In connection with the Merger, balances in accumulated other comprehensive loss at Merger Effectiveness Time were eliminated as a result of reflecting the balance sheet at fair value as of the date of the Merger. See Note 3 and 16 for further information regarding the Merger and pension and OPEB plans, respectively. |
59
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The tax (expense) benefit on the net activity related to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
$ | 1 | $ | 6 | $ | (19 | ) | $ | 7 | |||||||
Pension benefit plansnet |
(37 | ) | (145 | ) | (163 | ) | (317 | ) | ||||||||
Other benefit plansnet |
15 | (5 | ) | 194 | 135 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
(Provision for) benefit from income taxes related to other comprehensive income (loss) items |
$ | (21 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | $ | 12 | $ | (175 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss is provided as follows:
Successor | Predecessor |
Income
Classification |
||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative Instruments: |
$ | | $ | (21 | ) | $ | 18 | $ | 12 | (1) | ||||||||||
Tax expense (benefit) |
| 8 | (7 | ) | (5 | ) | (2) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
After-tax |
$ | | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 11 | $ | 7 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Amortization of pension benefit plans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service benefit |
| (3 | ) | (6 | ) | (9 | ) | (3) | ||||||||||||
Actuarial losses |
| 506 | 822 | 768 | (3) | |||||||||||||||
Curtailment gain (loss) |
| | 40 | (6 | ) | (3) | ||||||||||||||
Settlement loss |
| | 62 | 76 | (3) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total before tax |
$ | | $ | 503 | $ | 918 | $ | 829 | ||||||||||||
Tax benefit |
| (178 | ) | (324 | ) | (294 | ) | (2) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
After-tax |
$ | | $ | 325 | $ | 594 | $ | 535 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Amortization of other benefit plans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service benefit |
| (46 | ) | (134 | ) | (182 | ) | (3) | ||||||||||||
Actuarial losses |
| 61 | 78 | 78 | (3) | |||||||||||||||
Curtailment gain |
| | (392 | ) | (274 | ) | (3) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total before tax |
$ | | $ | 15 | $ | (448 | ) | $ | (378 | ) | ||||||||||
Tax (benefit) expense |
| (5 | ) | 150 | 135 | (2) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
After-tax |
$ | | $ | 10 | $ | (298 | ) | $ | (243 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net realized (losses) gains on investments, before tax: |
| (1 | ) | 28 | (2 | ) | (4) | |||||||||||||
Tax expense |
| | | | (2) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
After-tax |
$ | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total reclassifications for the period, after-tax |
$ | | $ | 321 | $ | 335 | $ | 297 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Cost of goods sold. |
2. |
Provision for income taxes from continuing operations. |
3. |
These accumulated other comprehensive loss components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost of the companys pension and other benefit plans. See Note 16 for additional information. |
4. |
Sundry incomenet. |
60
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The tax benefit (expense) recorded in Stockholders Equity was $33 million and $(138) million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Included in these amounts were tax benefits of $21 million and $37 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, associated with stock compensation programs. The remainder consists of amounts recorded within other comprehensive loss as shown in the table above.
NOTE 16PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
The company offers various long-term benefits to its employees. Where permitted by applicable law, the company reserves the right to change, modify or discontinue the plans.
As a result of the Merger, the company re-measured its pension and OPEB plans. The remeasurement of the companys pension and OPEB plans are included in the fair value measurement of DuPonts assets and liabilities as a result of the application of purchase accounting in connection with the Merger. In addition, net losses and prior service benefits recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss were eliminated. Dow and DuPont did not merge their pension plans and other post employment benefit plans as a result of the Merger. See Note 3 for details on the Merger.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans
The company has both funded and unfunded noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering a majority of the U.S. employees and a number of other countries. The principal U.S. pension plan is the largest pension plan held by DuPont. Most employees hired on or after January 1, 2007 are not eligible to participate in the U.S. defined benefit pension plans. The benefits under these plans are based primarily on years of service and employees pay near retirement. In November 2016, the company announced that it will freeze the pay and service amounts used to calculate pension benefits for active employees who participate in the U.S. pension plans on November 30, 2018. Therefore, as of November 30, 2018, active employees participating in the U.S. pension plans will not accrue additional benefits for future service and eligible compensation received. These changes resulted in a $527 million decline in the projected benefit obligation, which is reflected in actuarial loss (gain) in the change in projected benefit obligations table on page 66, and recognition of a $25 million pre-tax curtailment gain during the fourth quarter of 2016. The decline in the projected benefit obligation is primarily due to the decrease in expected future compensation.
The companys funding policy is consistent with the funding requirements of federal laws and regulations. Pension coverage for employees of the companys non-U.S. consolidated subsidiaries is provided, to the extent deemed appropriate, through separate plans. Obligations under such plans are funded by depositing funds with trustees, covered by insurance contracts, or remain unfunded. The company did not make any contributions to its principal U.S. pension plan for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017. During the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, the company made total contributions of $2,900 million to its principal U.S. pension plan funded through the May 2017 Debt Offering; short-term borrowings, including commercial paper issuance; and cash flow from operations. See Note 13 for further discussion related to the May 2017 Debt Offering. The company contributed $230 million to the principal U.S. pension plan in 2016. No contributions were made to its principal U.S. pension plan in 2015. The company does not expect to make cash contributions to this plan in 2018.
The company made total contributions of $34 million, $67 million, $121 million and $164 million to its funded pension plans other than the principal U.S. pension plan for the periods September 1 through December 31, 2017 and January 1 through August 31, 2017 and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Additionally, the company made total contributions of $34 million, $57 million, $184 million and $144 million
61
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
to its remaining plans with no plan assets for the periods September 1 through December 31, 2017 and January 1 through August 31, 2017 and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. DuPont expects to contribute approximately $200 million to its funded pension plans other than the principal U.S. pension plan and its remaining plans with no plan assets in 2018.
The companys remeasurement of its pension plans at the Merger Effectiveness Time resulted in an increase in the underfunded status of $560 million. In connection with the remeasurement, the company updated the weighted average discount rate to 3.42 percent at August 31, 2017 from 3.80 percent as of December 31, 2016.
The workforce reductions in 2016 related to a 2016 global cost savings and restructuring plan triggered curtailments for certain of the companys pension plans, including the principal U.S. pension plan. For the principal U.S. pension plan, the company recorded curtailment losses of $63 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. The curtailment losses were driven by the changes in the benefit obligation based on the demographics of the terminated positions partially offset by accelerated recognition of a portion of the prior service benefit.
In the fourth quarter 2016, about $550 million of lump-sum payments were made from the principal U.S. pension plan trust fund to a group of separated, vested plan participants who were extended a limited-time opportunity and voluntarily elected to receive their pension benefits in a single lump-sum payment. In the fourth quarter 2017, about $140 million of lump-sum payments were made from the principal U.S. pension plan trust fund under a similar program. Since the company recognizes pension settlements only when the lump-sum payments exceed the sum of the plans service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost for the year, these lump-sum payments did not result in the recognition of a pension settlement charge.
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine pension plan obligations for all pension plans are summarized in the table below:
Weighted-Average Assumptions used to Determine Benefit Obligations |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
|||||||
Discount rate |
3.37 | % | 3.80 | % | ||||
Rate of increase in future compensation levels 1 |
4.04 | % | 3.80 | % |
1. |
The rate of compensation increase represents the single annual effective salary increase that an average plan participant would receive during the participants entire career at the company. |
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs for all pension plans are summarized in the two tables below:
62
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs for U.S. plans are summarized in the table below:
Weighted- Average Assumptions used to Determine Net
Periodic
|
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
|||||||||||||
Discount rate |
3.73 | % | 4.16 | % | 4.04 | % | 4.29 | % | ||||||||
Rate of increase in future compensation levels |
3.95 | % | 3.95 | % | 4.15 | % | 4.20 | % | ||||||||
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets |
6.25 | % | 8.00 | % | 8.00 | % | 8.50 | % |
Other Post Employment Benefits
The company provides medical, dental and life insurance benefits to certain pensioners and survivors. The associated plans for retiree benefits are unfunded and the cost of the approved claims is paid from company funds. Essentially all of the cost and liabilities for these retiree benefit plans are attributable to the U.S. benefit plans. The non-Medicare eligible retiree medical plan is contributory with pensioners and survivors contributions adjusted annually to achieve a 50/50 target for sharing of cost increases between the company and pensioners and survivors. In addition, limits are applied to DuPonts portion of the retiree medical cost coverage. For Medicare eligible pensioners and survivors, DuPont provides a company-funded Health Reimbursement Arrangement (HRA). In November 2016, the company announced that eligible employees who will be under the age of 50 as of November 30, 2018 will not receive post-retirement medical, dental and life insurance benefits. As a result of these changes, the company recognized a pre-tax curtailment gain of $357 million during the fourth quarter of 2016. Beginning January 1, 2015, eligible employees who retire on and after that date will receive the same life insurance benefit payment, regardless of employees age or pay. The majority of U.S. employees hired on or after January 1, 2007 are not eligible to participate in the post-retirement medical, dental and life insurance plans.
The company also provides disability benefits to employees. Employee disability benefit plans are insured in many countries. However, primarily in the U.S., such plans are generally self-insured. Obligations and expenses for self-insured plans are reflected in the change in projected benefit obligations table on page 66.
The companys remeasurement of its OPEB plans at the Merger Effectiveness Time resulted in an increase in the benefit obligation of $41 million. In connection with the remeasurement, the company lowered the weighted average discount rate to 3.62 percent as of August 31, 2017 from 4.03 percent as of December 31, 2016.
As a result of the workforce reductions related to a 2016 global cost savings and restructuring plan, a curtailment was triggered for the companys other post employment benefit plans. The company recorded curtailment gains of $35 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. The curtailment gains were driven by accelerated recognition of a portion of the prior service benefit partially offset by the change in the benefit obligation based on the demographics of the terminated positions.
The companys OPEB plans are unfunded and the cost of the approved claims is paid from operating cash flows. Pre-tax cash requirements to cover actual net claims costs and related administrative expenses were $59 million, $166 million, $218 million, and $237 million for the periods September 1 through December 31, 2017 and January 1 through August 31, 2017 and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Changes in cash requirements reflect the net impact of higher per capita health care costs, demographic changes, plan amendments and changes in participant premiums, co-pays and deductibles. In 2018, the company expects to contribute about $250 million for its OPEB plans.
63
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations for OPEB plans are summarized in the table below:
Weighted-Average Assumptions used to Determine Benefit Obligations |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
|||||||
Discount rate |
3.56 | % | 4.03 | % |
The weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs for the OPEB plans are summarized in the two tables below:
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
|||||||
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year |
6.40 | % | 7.00 | % | ||||
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate health care trend rate) |
5.00 | % | 5.00 | % | ||||
Year that the rate reached the ultimate health care cost trend rate |
2023 | 2023 |
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a modest effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have an immaterial impact on service and interest cost and the postretirement benefit obligation.
Assumptions
Within the U.S., the company determines the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets by performing a detailed analysis of key economic and market factors driving historical returns for each asset class and formulating a projected return based on factors in the current environment. Factors considered include, but are not limited to, inflation, real economic growth, interest rate yield, interest rate spreads, and other valuation measures and market metrics. The expected long-term rate of return for each asset class is then weighted based on the strategic asset allocation approved by the governing body for each plan. The companys historical experience with the pension fund asset performance is also considered. For non-U.S. plans, assumptions reflect economic assumptions applicable to each country.
Effective 2016, DuPont elected to adopt a spot rate approach to determine the discount rate utilized to measure the service cost and interest cost components of net periodic pension and other post employment benefit costs for its U.S. plans. Under the spot rate approach, the company calculates service costs and interest costs by applying individual spot rates from a yield curve (based on high-quality corporate bond yields) to the separate expected cash flows components of service cost and interest cost. Service cost and interest cost for all other plans are determined on the basis of the single equivalent discount rates derived in determining those plan obligations. The company changed to the new method to provide a more precise measure of interest and service costs for certain plans by improving the correlation between projected benefit cash flows and the discrete spot yield curves. The
64
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
company has accounted for this change as a change in accounting estimate and it was applied prospectively starting in 2016. For non-U.S. benefit plans, the company utilizes prevailing long-term high quality corporate bond indices to determine the discount rate applicable to each country at the measurement date.
The discount rates utilized to measure the pension and other post employment obligations are based on the yield on high-quality corporate fixed income investments at the measurement date. Future expected actuarially determined cash flows are individually discounted at the spot rates under Aon Hewitt AA_Above Median yield curve (based on high-quality corporate bond yields) to arrive at the plans obligations as of the measurement date. For non-U.S. benefit plans, the company utilizes prevailing long-term high quality corporate bond indices to determine the discount rate applicable to each country at the measurement date.
In October 2014, the U.S. Society of Actuaries (SOA) released final reports of new mortality tables and a mortality improvement scale for measurement of retirement program obligations in the U.S. The SOA publishes updated mortality improvement scales on an annual basis. The company has adopted the 2016 and 2017 SOA mortality improvement scale in measuring its U.S. pension and other postretirement obligations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively. The effect of these adoptions is amortized into net periodic benefit cost for the years following the adoption.
65
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Summarized information on the companys pension and other post employment benefit plans is as follows:
Change in Projected Benefit Obligations, Plan Assets and Funded Status |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Other Post Employment Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 1 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 1 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
||||||||||||||||||
Change in benefit obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of the period |
$ | 26,036 | $ | 24,831 | $ | 26,094 | $ | 2,772 | $ | 2,829 | $ | 2,758 | ||||||||||||
Service cost |
49 | 92 | 174 | 3 | 6 | 11 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
247 | 524 | 800 | 26 | 60 | 87 | ||||||||||||||||||
Plan participants contributions |
6 | 8 | 18 | 12 | 26 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial (gain) loss |
(23 | ) | | 460 | 68 | | 153 | |||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid 2 |
(730 | ) | (1,118 | ) | (2,374 | ) | (71 | ) | (192 | ) | (254 | ) | ||||||||||||
Plan amendments |
| | | | | (28 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net effects of acquisitions / divestitures / other |
22 | | 7 | | | 65 | ||||||||||||||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rates |
(57 | ) | 429 | (348 | ) | | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Benefit obligations at end of the period |
$ | 25,550 | $ | 24,766 | $ | 24,831 | $ | 2,810 | $ | 2,731 | $ | 2,829 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Change in plan assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the period |
$ | 20,395 | $ | 16,656 | $ | 17,497 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets |
549 | 846 | 1,219 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Employer contributions |
68 | 3,024 | 535 | 59 | 166 | 218 | ||||||||||||||||||
Plan participants contributions |
6 | 8 | 18 | 12 | 26 | 36 | ||||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid 2 |
(730 | ) | (1,118 | ) | (2,374 | ) | (71 | ) | (192 | ) | (254 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net effects of acquisitions / divestitures / other |
29 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rates |
(33 | ) | 269 | (239 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of the period |
$ | 20,284 | $ | 19,685 | $ | 16,656 | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Funded status |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. plan with plan assets |
$ | (3,628 | ) | $ | (3,277 | ) | $ | (6,391 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Non-U.S. plans with plan assets |
(447 | ) | (609 | ) | (674 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
All other plans 3, 4 |
(1,191 | ) | (1,187 | ) | (1,102 | ) | (2,810 | ) | (2,731 | ) | (2,829 | ) | ||||||||||||
Plans of discontinued operations |
| (8 | ) | (8 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Funded status at end of the period |
$ | (5,266 | ) | $ | (5,081 | ) | $ | (8,175 | ) | $ | (2,810 | ) | $ | (2,731 | ) | $ | (2,829 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
The benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets at the beginning of the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, reflects the remeasurement of the plans at the Merger Effectiveness Time. |
2. |
In the fourth quarter of 2016, about $550 million of lump-sum payments were made from the principal U.S. pension plan trust fund to a group of separated, vested plan participants who were extended a limited-time opportunity and voluntarily elected to receive their pension benefits in a single lump-sum payment. In the fourth quarter of 2017, about $140 million of lump-sum payments were made from the principal U.S. pension plan trust fund under a similar program. |
3. |
As of December 31, 2017, $389 million of the benefit obligations are supported by funding under the Trust agreement, defined in the Trust Assets section below. |
4. |
Includes pension plans maintained around the world where funding is not customary. |
66
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Defined Benefit Pension Plans |
Other Post Employment
Benefits |
|||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
|||||||||||||
Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets: |
||||||||||||||||
Other Assets |
$ | 47 | $ | 3 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
(86 | ) | (78 | ) | (250 | ) | (275 | ) | ||||||||
Liabilities held for salecurrent |
| (8 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Pension and other post employment benefitsnoncurrent 1 |
(5,227 | ) | (2,560 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other noncurrent obligations 1 |
| (8,092 | ) | | (2,554 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net amount recognized |
$ | (5,266 | ) | $ | (8,175 | ) | $ | (2,810 | ) | $ | (2,829 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Pretax amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss: |
||||||||||||||||
Net (gain) loss |
$ | (165 | ) | $ | 10,280 | $ | 68 | $ | 830 | |||||||
Prior service benefit |
| (17 | ) | | (281 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Pretax balance in accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss at end of year |
$ | (165 | ) | $ | 10,263 | $ | 68 | $ | 549 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
In the Successor Period, non-current pension and OPEB liabilities are included within pension and other post employment benefitsnoncurrent in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In the Predecessor period, these liabilities are included within other noncurrent obligations. |
The accumulated benefit obligation for all pensions plans was $25.1 billion and $24.3 billion at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Pension Plans with Projected Benefit Obligations in Excess of Plan Assets (In millions) |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
|||||||
Projected benefit obligations |
$ | 25,254 | $ | 24,779 | ||||
Accumulated benefit obligations |
24,864 | 24,297 | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets |
19,941 | 16,601 |
Pension Plans with Accumulated Benefit Obligations in Excess of Plan Assets (In millions) |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
|||||||
Projected benefit obligations |
$ | 24,625 | $ | 23,946 | ||||
Accumulated benefit obligations |
24,315 | 23,591 | ||||||
Fair value of plan assets |
19,335 | 15,838 |
67
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Defined Benefit Pension Plans | Other Post Employment Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic
|
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Periodic Benefit Cost: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 49 | $ | 92 | $ | 174 | $ | 232 | $ | 3 | $ | 6 | $ | 11 | $ | 15 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
247 | 524 | 800 | 1,084 | 26 | 60 | 87 | 112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(407 | ) | (824 | ) | (1,320 | ) | (1,554 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized loss |
| 506 | 822 | 768 | | 61 | 78 | 78 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service benefit |
| (3 | ) | (6 | ) | (9 | ) | | (46 | ) | (134 | ) | (182 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Curtailment loss (gain) |
| | 40 | (6 | ) | | | (392 | ) | (274 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement loss |
| | 62 | 76 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net periodic (credit) benefit costTotal |
$ | (111 | ) | $ | 295 | $ | 572 | $ | 591 | $ | 29 | $ | 81 | $ | (350 | ) | $ | (251 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Less: Discontinued operations |
1 | 3 | | | | | | (272 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Net periodic (credit) benefit costContinuing operations |
$ | (112 | ) | $ | 292 | $ | 572 | $ | 591 | $ | 29 | $ | 81 | $ | (350 | ) | $ | 21 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (gain) loss |
$ | (165 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | $ | 570 | $ | 57 | $ | 68 | $ | | $ | 153 | $ | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized loss |
| (506 | ) | (822 | ) | (768 | ) | | (61 | ) | (78 | ) | (78 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Prior service benefit |
| | | | | | (28 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service benefit |
| 3 | 6 | 9 | | 46 | 134 | 182 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Curtailment (loss) gain |
| | (40 | ) | 6 | | | 392 | 274 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Settlement loss |
| | (62 | ) | (76 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of foreign exchange rates |
| 133 | (138 | ) | (119 | ) | | | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Spin-off of Chemours |
| | | (382 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total (benefit) loss recognized in other comprehensive loss, attributable to DuPont |
$ | (165 | ) | $ | (392 | ) | $ | (486 | ) | $ | (1,273 | ) | $ | 68 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 573 | $ | 375 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive (income) loss |
$ | (276 | ) | $ | (97 | ) | $ | 86 | $ | (682 | ) | $ | 97 | $ | 66 | $ | 223 | $ | 124 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated pretax net gain for the defined benefit pensions plans that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss into net periodic benefit cost during 2018 is $1 million.
68
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The estimated future benefit payments, reflecting expected future service, as appropriate, are presented in the following table:
Estimated Future Benefit Payments at December 31, 2017 (Successor) (In millions) |
Defined Benefit
Pension Plans |
Other Post Employment
Benefits |
||||||
2018 |
$ | 1,636 | $ | 250 | ||||
2019 |
1,614 | 243 | ||||||
2020 |
1,600 | 236 | ||||||
2021 |
1,587 | 227 | ||||||
2022 |
1,568 | 218 | ||||||
Years 2023-2027 |
7,533 | 906 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
15,538 | 2,080 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
Plan Assets
All pension plan assets in the U.S. are invested through a single master trust fund. The strategic asset allocation for this trust fund is approved by management. The general principles guiding U.S. pension asset investment policies are those embodied in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA). These principles include discharging DuPonts investment responsibilities for the exclusive benefit of plan participants and in accordance with the prudent expert standard and other ERISA rules and regulations. DuPont establishes strategic asset allocation percentage targets and appropriate benchmarks for significant asset classes with the aim of achieving a prudent balance between return and risk. Strategic asset allocations in other countries are selected in accordance with the laws and practices of those countries. Where appropriate, asset liability studies are utilized in this process. U.S. plan assets and a portion of non-U.S. plan assets are managed by investment professionals employed by DuPont. The remaining assets are managed by professional investment firms unrelated to the company. DuPonts pension investment professionals have discretion to manage the assets within established asset allocation ranges approved by management of the company. Additionally, pension trust funds are permitted to enter into certain contractual arrangements generally described as derivatives. Derivatives are primarily used to reduce specific market risks, hedge currency and adjust portfolio duration and asset allocation in a cost-effective manner.
In connection with pension contributions of $2,900 million to its principal U.S. pension plan during the period of January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017, an investment policy study was completed for the principal U.S. pension plan. The study resulted in new target asset allocations being approved for the U.S. pension plan with resulting changes to the expected return on plan assets. The long-term rate of return on assets decreased from 8 percent to 6.25 percent.
69
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The weighted-average target allocation for plan assets of the companys pension plans is summarized as follows:
Target Allocation for Plan Assets Asset Category |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||
December
31,
2017 |
December
31,
2016 |
|||||||
U.S. equity securities |
17 | % | 27 | % | ||||
Non-U.S. equity securities |
18 | 24 | ||||||
Fixed income securities |
50 | 33 | ||||||
Hedge funds |
2 | 2 | ||||||
Private market securities |
8 | 8 | ||||||
Real estate |
3 | 4 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
2 | 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
|
|
|
|
Global equity securities include varying market capitalization levels. U.S. equity investments are primarily large-cap companies. Global fixed income investments include corporate-issued, government-issued and asset-backed securities. Corporate debt investments include a range of credit risk and industry diversification. U.S. fixed income investments are weighted heavier than non-U.S. fixed income securities. Other investments include cash and cash equivalents, hedge funds, real estate and private market securities such as interests in private equity and venture capital partnerships.
Fair value calculations may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, although the company believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.
For pension plan assets classified as Level 1 measurements (measured using quoted prices in active markets), total fair value is either the price of the most recent trade at the time of the market close or the official close price, as defined by the exchange on which the asset is most actively traded on the last trading day of the period, multiplied by the number of units held without consideration of transaction costs.
For pension or other post employment benefit plan assets classified as Level 2 measurements, where the security is frequently traded in less active markets, fair value is based on the closing price at the end of the period; where the security is less frequently traded, fair value is based on the price a dealer would pay for the security or similar securities, adjusted for any terms specific to that asset or liability. Market inputs are obtained from well-established and recognized vendors of market data and subjected to tolerance and quality checks. For derivative assets and liabilities, standard industry models are used to calculate the fair value of the various financial instruments based on significant observable market inputs, such as foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, swap rates, interest rates and implied volatilities obtained from various market sources.
For pension plan assets classified as Level 3 measurements, total fair value is based on significant unobservable inputs including assumptions where there is little, if any, market activity for the investment. Investment managers or fund managers provide valuations of the investment on a monthly or quarterly basis. These valuations are reviewed for reasonableness based on applicable sector, benchmark and company performance. Adjustments to valuations are made where appropriate. Where available, audited financial statements are obtained and reviewed for the investments as support for the managers investment valuation.
70
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The tables below present the fair values of the companys pension assets by level within the fair value hierarchy, as described in Note 1 :
Basis of Fair Value Measurements For the year ended December 31, 2017 (Successor) (In millions) |
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 3,057 | $ | 3,057 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
U.S. equity securities 1 |
4,043 | 4,012 | 14 | 17 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. equity securities |
3,064 | 2,866 | 195 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Debtgovernment-issued |
3,263 | 497 | 2,766 | | ||||||||||||
Debtcorporate-issued |
3,181 | 270 | 2,884 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Debtasset-backed |
706 | 17 | 687 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Hedge funds |
85 | | 83 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Private market securities |
14 | | | 14 | ||||||||||||
Real estate |
342 | 239 | 7 | 96 | ||||||||||||
Derivativesasset position |
24 | 3 | 21 | | ||||||||||||
Derivativesliability position |
(16 | ) | | (16 | ) | | ||||||||||
Other |
2 | | 2 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 17,765 | $ | 10,961 | $ | 6,643 | $ | 161 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Investments measured at net asset value |
||||||||||||||||
Hedge funds |
747 | |||||||||||||||
Private market securities |
1,383 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate funds |
437 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total investments measured at net asset value |
$ | 2,567 | ||||||||||||||
Other items to reconcile to fair value of plan assets |
||||||||||||||||
Pension trust receivables 2 |
127 | |||||||||||||||
Pension trust payables 3 |
(175 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,284 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
1. |
The DuPont pension plans directly held $910 million ( 4 percent of total plan assets) of DowDuPont common stock at December 31, 2017. |
2. |
Primarily receivables for investments securities sold. |
3. |
Primarily payables for investment securities purchased |
71
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Basis of Fair Value Measurements For the year ended December 31, 2016 (Predecessor) (In millions) |
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,505 | $ | 1,480 | $ | 25 | $ | | ||||||||
U.S. equity securities 1 |
4,071 | 4,033 | 20 | 18 | ||||||||||||
Non-U.S. equity securities |
3,278 | 3,126 | 151 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Debtgovernment-issued |
2,067 | 864 | 1,203 | | ||||||||||||
Debtcorporate-issued |
2,475 | 273 | 2,163 | 39 | ||||||||||||
Debtasset-backed |
721 | 39 | 682 | | ||||||||||||
Hedge funds |
1 | | 1 | | ||||||||||||
Private market securities |
67 | | 25 | 42 | ||||||||||||
Real estate |
275 | 175 | 2 | 98 | ||||||||||||
Derivativesasset position |
53 | 7 | 46 | | ||||||||||||
Derivativesliability position |
(47 | ) | | (47 | ) | | ||||||||||
Other |
4 | | 4 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Subtotal |
$ | 14,470 | $ | 9,997 | $ | 4,275 | $ | 198 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Investments measured at net asset value |
||||||||||||||||
Hedge funds |
434 | |||||||||||||||
Private market securities |
1,416 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate funds |
444 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total investments measured at net asset value |
$ | 2,294 | ||||||||||||||
Other items to reconcile to fair value of plan assets |
||||||||||||||||
Pension trust receivables 2 |
264 | |||||||||||||||
Pension trust payables 3 |
(372 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 16,656 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
1. |
The DuPont pension plans directly held $732 million ( 4 percent of total plan assets) of DuPont common stock at December 31, 2016. |
2. |
Primarily receivables for investments securities sold. |
3. |
Primarily payables for investment securities purchased. |
72
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of Level 3 pension plan assets for the year ended December 31, 2016 and for the periods January 1 through August 31, 2017 and September 1 through December 31, 2017:
Fair Value Measurement of Level 3 Pension Plan Assets (In millions) |
U.S.
equity securities |
Non-U.S.
equity securities |
Debt
corporate- issued |
Debt-
asset- backed |
Hedge
funds |
Private
market securities |
Real
estate |
Total
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Predecessor |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 |
$ | 20 | $ | 2 | $ | 34 | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | 37 | $ | 144 | $ | 238 | ||||||||||||||||
Actual return on assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relating to assets sold during the year ended December 31, 2016 |
(3 | ) | | (25 | ) | | | | | (28 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Relating to assets held at December 31, 2016 |
1 | (1 | ) | 27 | | | 2 | (10 | ) | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases, sales and settlements, net |
| | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | | 3 | (36 | ) | (37 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers in Level 3, net |
| | 6 | | | | | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
$ | 18 | $ | 1 | $ | 39 | $ | | $ | | $ | 42 | $ | 98 | $ | 198 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Actual return on assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relating to assets sold during the period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
(1 | ) | 2 | (20 | ) | | | | | (19 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Relating to assets held at August 31, 2017 |
(7 | ) | (2 | ) | 22 | | | (5 | ) | 7 | 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases, sales and settlements, net |
6 | 1 | (1 | ) | | | 1 | (7 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers in (out) of Level 3, net |
| | 6 | 2 | | (21 | ) | | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at August 31, 2017 |
$ | 16 | $ | 2 | $ | 46 | $ | 2 | $ | | $ | 17 | $ | 98 | $ | 181 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Successor |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 1, 2017 |
$ | 16 | $ | 2 | $ | 46 | $ | 2 | $ | | $ | 17 | $ | 98 | $ | 181 | ||||||||||||||||
Actual return on assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Relating to assets sold during the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
| | (3 | ) | | | | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Relating to assets held at December 31, 2017 |
1 | (1 | ) | 5 | | | (3 | ) | 4 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases, sales and settlements, net |
| 2 | (21 | ) | | 2 | | (6 | ) | (23 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
$ | 17 | $ | 3 | $ | 27 | $ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 14 | $ | 96 | $ | 161 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents additional information about the pension plan assets valued using net asset value as a practical expedient:
(In millions) |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2016 | |||||||||||||||||||
Fair
Value |
Unfunded
Commitments |
Fair
Value |
Unfunded
Commitments |
Redemption
|
Redemption Notice Period Range |
|||||||||||||||
Hedge funds 1 |
747 | | 434 | | Monthly, Quarterly | Ranges from 15-45 days monthly, 10-185 days quarterly | ||||||||||||||
Private market securities 2 |
1,383 | 797 | 1,416 | 693 | Not applicable | Not applicable | ||||||||||||||
Real estate funds 2 |
437 | 371 | 444 | 244 | Not applicable | Not applicable | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,567 | $ | 1,168 | $ | 2,294 | $ | 937 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Less than 5 percent of hedge funds have gates in place at the investor level for year-end redemptions. Hedge funds also contain either no lock up or a lock up period of less than 1 year. |
2. |
The remaining life of private market securities and real estate funds is an average of 15 years per investment. |
73
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Trust Assets
DuPont entered into a trust agreement in 2013 (as amended and restated in 2017) that established and requires DuPont to fund a trust (the Trust) for cash obligations under certain non-qualified benefit and deferred compensation plans upon a change in control event as defined in the Trust agreement. Under the Trust agreement, the consummation of the Merger was a change in control event. As a result, in November 2017, DuPont contributed $571 million to the Trust. In the fourth quarter of 2017, $13 million was distributed to DuPont according to the Trust agreement and at December 31, 2017, the balance in the Trust was $558 million.
Defined Contribution Plans
DuPont provides defined contribution benefits to its employees. The most significant is the U.S. Retirement Savings Plan (the Plan), which covers all U.S. full-service employees. This Plan includes a non-leveraged Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). Employees are not required to participate in the ESOP and those who do are free to diversify out of the ESOP. The purpose of the Plan is to provide retirement savings benefits for employees and to provide employees an opportunity to become stockholders of the company. The Plan is a tax qualified contributory profit sharing plan, with cash or deferred arrangement and any eligible employee of DuPont may participate. Currently, DuPont contributes 100 percent of the first 6 percent of the employees contribution election and also contributes 3 percent of each eligible employees eligible compensation regardless of the employees contribution.
DuPonts contributions to the Plan were $53 million, $129 million, $187 million and $219 million for the periods September 1 through December 31, 2017 and January 1 through August 31, 2017 and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. DuPonts matching contributions vest immediately upon contribution. The 3 percent nonmatching company contribution vests after employees complete three years of service. In addition, DuPont made contributions to other defined contribution plans of $17 million, $33 million, $33 million and $57 million for the periods September 1 through December 31, 2017 and January 1 through August 31, 2017 and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Included in DuPonts contributions are amounts related to discontinued operations of $1 million, $5 million, $6 million and $39 million for the periods September 1 through December 31, 2017 and January 1 through August 31, 2017 and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
NOTE 17STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The companys Equity Incentive Plan (EIP), as amended and restated effective August 31, 2017, provides for equity-based and cash incentive awards to certain employees, directors, and consultants. All outstanding DuPont equity awards as of the Merger date were converted into equity awards with respect to DowDuPont Common Stock. The previous DuPont equity awards were converted into the right to receive 1.2820 shares of DowDuPont Common Stock and had a fair value of approximately $629 million at the Merger closing date, which was included in the total consideration exchanged. The converted DuPont equity awards were measured at their fair value and included $485 million as consideration exchanged and $144 million (includes $23 million of incremental expense as a result of the conversion) that will be amortized to stock compensation expense over the remaining vesting period of the awards. The fair values of the converted awards were based on valuation assumptions developed by management and other information including, but not limited to, historical volatility and dividend yield of DuPont and Dow. DuPont and Dow did not merge their equity and incentive plans as a result of the Merger.
Under the amended EIP, the maximum number of shares reserved for the grant or settlement of awards is 110 million shares, provided that each share in excess of 30 million that is issued with respect to any award that is not an option or stock appreciation right will be counted against the 110 million share limit as four and
74
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
one-half shares. At December 31, 2017, approximately 34 million shares were authorized for future grants under the EIP. The company satisfies stock option exercises and vesting of time-vested restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based restricted stock units (PSUs) with newly issued shares of DowDuPont Common Stock.
The total stock-based compensation cost included in continuing operations within the Consolidated Statement of Operations was $33 million, $85 million, $118 million and $127 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The income tax benefits related to stock-based compensation arrangements were $11 million, $29 million, $39 million and $42 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The compensation committee determines the long-term incentive mix, including stock options, RSUs and PSUs and may authorize new grants annually. The company estimates expected forfeitures.
Stock Options
The exercise price of shares subject to option is equal to the market price of DowDuPonts stock on the date of grant. All options vest serially over a three -year period. Stock option awards granted between 2010 and 2015 expire seven years after the grant date and options granted in 2016 and 2017 expire ten years after the grant date. The plan allows retirement-eligible employees to retain any granted awards upon retirement provided the employee has rendered at least six months of service following grant date.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted in the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $28.56, $16.65, $13.40, and $11.57, respectively.
To measure the fair value of the awards on the date of grant, the company used the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:
Weighted-Average Assumptions |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||
For the
Period September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the
Period January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
|||||||||||||
Dividend yield |
2.2 | % | 2.0 | % | 2.6 | % | 2.5 | % | ||||||||
Expected volatility |
23.59 | % | 23.21 | % | 28.27 | % | 22.52 | % | ||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.1 | % | 2.3 | % | 1.8 | % | 1.4 | % | ||||||||
Expected life of stock options granted during period (years) |
7.2 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 5.3 |
In the Successor period, the company determined the dividend yield by dividing the annualized dividend on DowDuPonts Common Stock by the option exercise price. In the Predecessor periods, the company determined the dividend yield by dividing the annual dividend on DuPonts stock by the option exercise price. A historical daily measurement of volatility is determined based on the expected life of the option granted. In the Successor period, the measurement of volatility used DowDuPont stock information after the Merger date, and a weighted average of Dow and DuPont stock information prior to Merger date. In the Predecessor periods, the measurement of volatility used DuPont stock information.
75
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The risk-free interest rate is determined by reference to the yield on an outstanding U.S. Treasury note with a term equal to the expected life of the option granted. Expected life is determined by reference to the companys historical experience.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for 2017 under the EIP:
Stock Options |
2017 | |||||||||||||||
Number of
Shares (in thousands) |
Weighted Average
Exercise Price (per share) |
Weighted Average
Remaining Contractual Term (years) |
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value (in thousands) |
|||||||||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2017 (Predecessor) |
15,696 | $ | 58.11 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
1,626 | 76.18 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(4,356 | ) | 54.52 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited/Expired |
(136 | ) | 60.93 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Outstanding at August 31, 2017 1 |
12,830 | $ | 61.84 | 4.71 | $ | 283,365 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Exercisable at August 31, 2017 |
8,441 | $ | 57.78 | 3.37 | $ | 220,716 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Outstanding at September 1, 2017 (Successor) 1 |
16,447 | $ | 48.24 | |||||||||||||
Granted |
174 | 45.29 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised |
(702 | ) | 43.07 | |||||||||||||
Forfeited/Expired |
(30 | ) | 54.83 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2017 |
15,889 | $ | 48.43 | 3.74 | $ | 362,088 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2017 |
10,881 | $ | 45.75 | 3.06 | $ | 277,163 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
As a result of the Merger, all previous DuPont equity awards were converted into the right to receive 1.2820 shares of DowDuPont Common Stock, as discussed above. As a result, the number of shares outstanding at September 1, 2017 represents the shares as of August 31, 2017 multiplied by the conversion factor. |
The aggregate intrinsic values in the table above represent the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the closing stock price on the last trading day of the period and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their in-the-money options at period end. Total intrinsic value of options exercised for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 were $19 million, $108 million, $86 million and $160 million, respectively. For the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 and for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, the company realized tax benefits from options exercised of $6 million and $36 million, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, $24 million of total unrecognized pre-tax compensation expense related to non-vested stock options is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.86 years.
Restricted Stock Units and Performance Deferred Stock
The company issues non-vested RSUs that serially vest over a three -year period and, upon vesting, convert one -for-one to DowDuPont Common Stock. A retirement-eligible employee retains any granted awards upon retirement provided the employee has rendered at least six months of service following the grant date. Additional RSUs are also granted periodically to key senior management employees. These RSUs generally vest over periods ranging from two to five years. The fair value of all stock-settled RSUs is based upon the market price of the underlying common stock as of the grant date. The awards have the same terms and conditions as were applicable to such equity awards immediately prior to the Merger closing date.
76
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The company grants PSUs to senior leadership. As a result of the Merger, the EIP provisions required PSUs to be converted into RSUs based on the number of PSUs that would vest by assuming that target levels of performance are achieved. Service requirements for vesting in the RSUs replicate those inherent in the exchanged PSUs.
Vesting for PSUs granted in 2016 and for the period January 1, 2017 through August 31, 2017 is based upon total shareholder return (TSR) relative to peer companies. Vesting for PSUs granted in 2015 is equally based upon change in operating net income relative to target and TSR relative to peer companies. Operating net income is net income attributable to DuPont excluding income from discontinued operations after taxes, significant after tax benefits (charges), and non-operating pension and OPEB costs. Non-operating pension and OPEB costs includes all of the components of net periodic benefit cost from continuing operations with the exception of the service cost component. Performance and payouts are determined independently for each metric. The actual award, delivered as DowDuPont Common Stock, can range from zero percent to 200 percent of the original grant. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of PSUs granted for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, subject to the TSR metric, was $91.56, and estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the PSUs, subject to the revenue metric, was based upon the market price of the underlying common stock as of the grant date.
In accordance with the Merger Agreement, PSUs converted to RSUs based on an assessment of the underlying market conditions in the PSUs at the greater of target or actual performance levels as of the closing date. As the actual performance levels were not in excess of target as of the closing date, all PSUs converted to RSUs based on target and there was no incremental benefit from the Merger Agreement when compared to DuPonts EIP.
In November 2017, DowDuPont granted PSUs to senior leadership that vest partially based on the realization of cost savings in connection with DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program, as well as DowDuPonts ability to complete the Intended Business Separations. Performance and payouts are determined independently for each metric. The actual award, delivered in DowDuPont Common Stock, can range from zero percent to 200 percent of the original grant. The weighted-average grant date fair value of the PSUs granted in November 2017 of $71.16 was based upon the market price of the underlying common stock as of the grant date.
Nonvested awards of RSUs and PSUs are shown below.
2017 | ||||||||
Number of
Shares (in thousands) |
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value (per share) |
|||||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2016 (Predecessor) |
3,390 | $ | 63.11 | |||||
Granted |
1,124 | 76.41 | ||||||
Vested |
(1,332 | ) | 63.08 | |||||
Forfeited |
(104 | ) | 70.69 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Nonvested at August 31, 2017 1 |
3,078 | $ | 67.53 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Nonvested at September 1, 2017 (Successor) 1 |
3,948 | $ | 67.06 | |||||
Granted |
412 | 70.02 | ||||||
Vested |
(139 | ) | 67.67 | |||||
Forfeited |
(23 | ) | 66.65 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Nonvested at December 31, 2017 |
4,198 | $ | 68.28 | |||||
|
|
|
|
1. |
As a result of the Merger, all previous DuPont equity awards were converted into the right to receive 1.2820 shares of DowDuPont Common Stock, as discussed above. As a result, the number of shares outstanding at September 1, 2017 represents the shares as of August 31, 2017 multiplied by the conversion factor. |
77
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The total fair value of stock units vested during for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $9 million, $84 million, $83 million and $64 million, respectively. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock units granted for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $70.02, $76.41, $59.50, and $71.66, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, $113 million of total unrecognized pre-tax compensation expense related to RSUs and PSUs is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.73 years.
Other Cash-based Awards
Other cash-based awards resulted in compensation expense of $83 million, $264 million, $295 million and $179 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017, and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, included in income from continuing operations within the Consolidated Statement of Operations.
At December 31, 2017, the company had $5,205 million ( $2,713 million at December 31, 2016) of held-to-maturity securities (primarily time deposits and money market funds) classified as cash equivalents, as these securities had maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase; and $952 million ( $1,362 million at December 31, 2016) of held-to-maturity securities (primarily time deposits) classified as marketable securities as these securities had maturities of more than three months to less than 1 year at the time of purchase. The companys investments in held-to-maturity securities are held at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. These securities are included in cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
Available-for-sale securities are reported at estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. There were no sales of available-for-sale securities for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017 or for the period January 1 through August 31, 2017. The proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities for the year ended December 31, 2016 were $788 million.
Derivative Instruments
Objectives and Strategies for Holding Derivative Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the company enters into contractual arrangements (derivatives) to reduce its exposure to foreign currency, interest rate and commodity price risks. The company has established a variety of derivative programs to be utilized for financial risk management. These programs reflect varying levels of exposure coverage and time horizons based on an assessment of risk.
Derivative programs have procedures and controls and are approved by the Corporate Financial Risk Management Committee, consistent with the companys financial risk management policies and guidelines. Derivative instruments used are forwards, options, futures and swaps. The company has not designated any nonderivatives as hedging instruments.
The companys financial risk management procedures also address counterparty credit approval, limits and routine exposure monitoring and reporting. The counterparties to these contractual arrangements are major financial institutions and major commodity exchanges. The company is exposed to credit loss in the event of
78
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
nonperformance by these counterparties. The company utilizes collateral support annex agreements with certain counterparties to limit its exposure to credit losses. The company anticipates performance by counterparties to these contracts and therefore no material loss is expected. Market and counterparty credit risks associated with these instruments are regularly reported to management.
The notional amounts of the companys derivative instruments were as follows:
Notional Amounts (In millions) |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||
December 31,
2017 |
December 31,
2016 |
|||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||
Commodity contracts |
$ | 587 | $ | 422 | ||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
10,454 | 9,896 | ||||||
Commodity contracts |
6 | 7 |
Foreign Currency Risk
The companys objective in managing exposure to foreign currency fluctuations is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign currency rate changes. Accordingly, the company enters into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to protect the value of its existing foreign currency-denominated assets, liabilities, commitments and cash flows.
The company routinely uses forward exchange contracts to offset its net exposures, by currency, related to the foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations. The primary business objective of this hedging program is to maintain an approximately balanced position in foreign currencies so that exchange gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes, net of related tax effects, are minimized. The company also uses foreign currency exchange contracts to offset a portion of the companys exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated revenues so that gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the USD value of the related foreign currency-denominated revenues. The objective of the hedge program is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Commodity Price Risk
Commodity price risk management programs serve to reduce exposure to price fluctuations on purchases of inventory such as corn, soybeans, soybean oil and soybean meal. The company enters into over-the-counter and exchange-traded derivative commodity instruments to hedge the commodity price risk associated with agricultural commodity exposures.
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
Foreign Currency Contracts
The company uses foreign currency exchange instruments such as forwards and options to offset a portion of the companys exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated revenues so that gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the USD value of the related foreign currency-denominated revenues. In addition, the company occasionally uses forward exchange contracts to offset a portion of the companys exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated transactions such as capital expenditures.
79
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Commodity Contracts
The company enters into over-the-counter and exchange-traded derivative commodity instruments, including options, futures and swaps, to hedge the commodity price risk associated with agriculture commodity exposures.
While each risk management program has a different time maturity period, most programs currently do not extend beyond the next two -year period. Cash flow hedge results are reclassified into earnings during the same period in which the related exposure impacts earnings. Reclassifications are made sooner if it appears that a forecasted transaction is not probable of occurring.
The following table summarizes the after-tax effect of cash flow hedges on accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 - December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
Jan. 1 - August 31, 2017 |
Year Ended
December 31, 2016 |
|||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | | $ | 7 | $ | (24 | ) | |||||
Additions and revaluations of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges |
(2 | ) | 3 | 20 | ||||||||
Clearance of hedge results to earnings |
| (13 | ) | 11 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Ending balance |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 7 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2017, an after-tax net loss of $(6) million is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings over the next twelve months.
Derivatives not Designated in Hedging Relationships
Foreign Currency Contracts
The company routinely uses forward exchange contracts to reduce its net exposure, by currency, related to foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations so that exchange gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes are minimized. The netting of such exposures precludes the use of hedge accounting; however, the required revaluation of the forward contracts and the associated foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities intends to achieve a minimal earnings impact, after taxes. The company also uses foreign currency exchange contracts to offset a portion of the companys exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated revenues so that gains and losses on the contracts offset changes in the USD value of the related foreign currency-denominated revenues.
Commodity Contracts
The company utilizes options, futures and swaps that are not designated as hedging instruments to reduce exposure to commodity price fluctuations on purchases of inventory such as corn, soybeans, soybean oil and soybean meal.
80
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
During the Predecessor period, the companys derivative assets and liabilities are reported on a gross basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. During the Successor period, to conform with DowDuPonts presentation post-merger, asset and liability derivatives subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement with the same counterparty are presented on a net basis in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The presentation of the companys derivative assets and liabilities is as follows:
Successor | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Balance Sheet Location |
Gross |
Counterparty and Cash
Collateral Netting 1 |
Net Amounts Included in
the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
||||||||||
Asset derivatives: |
||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
Other current assets | $ | 46 | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 9 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total asset derivatives |
$ | 46 | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 9 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liability derivatives: |
||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
Accrued and other current liabilities | $ | 79 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | 47 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total liability derivatives |
$ | 79 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | 47 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Counterparty and cash collateral amounts represent the estimated net settlement amount when applying netting and set-off rights included in master netting arrangements between the company and its counterparties and the payable or receivable for cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparty. The company held cash collateral of $5 million as of December 31, 2017. |
Predecessor | ||||||
(In millions) |
Balance Sheet Location |
December
31,
2016 |
||||
Asset derivatives: |
||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||
Foreign currency contracts 1 |
Accounts and notes receivablenet | $ | 182 | |||
|
|
|||||
Total asset derivatives 2 |
$ | 182 | ||||
|
|
|||||
Cash collateral 1 |
Accrued and other current liabilities | $ | 52 | |||
|
|
|||||
Liability derivatives: |
||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
Accrued and other current liabilities | $ | 121 | |||
|
|
|||||
Total liability derivatives 2 |
$ | 121 | ||||
|
|
1. |
Cash collateral held as of December 31, 2016 is related to foreign currency derivatives not designated as hedging instruments. |
2. |
The companys derivative assets and liabilities subject to enforceable master netting arrangements totaled $114 million at December 31, 2016. |
81
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
Effect of Derivative Instruments
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI
1
(Effective Portion)Pre Tax |
||||||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 - December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
Jan. 1 - August 31, 2017 |
Year Ended
December 31, 2016 |
Year Ended
December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
$ | | | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
3 | 5 | 32 | (35 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
$ | 3 | $ | 5 | $ | 32 | $ | (37 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 3 | $ | 5 | $ | 32 | $ | (37 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
OCI is defined as other comprehensive income (loss). |
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in IncomePre Tax 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
For the Period
September 1 - December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
Jan. 1 - August 31, 2017 |
Year Ended
December 31, 2016 |
Year Ended
December 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Fair value hedges: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps 2 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | (1 | ) | |||||||
Cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts 3 |
| | | 10 | ||||||||||||
Commodity contracts 2 |
| 21 | (18 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
$ | | $ | 21 | $ | (18 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts 4 |
91 | (431 | ) | (304 | ) | 434 | ||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts 3 |
| | (12 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||
Commodity contracts 2 |
| 2 | (11 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
91 | (429 | ) | (327 | ) | 429 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 91 | $ | (408 | ) | $ | (345 | ) | $ | 416 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
For cash flow hedges, this represents the effective portion of the gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income during the period. There was no material ineffectiveness with regard to the companys cash flow hedges during the period. |
2. |
Recorded in cost of goods sold. |
3. |
Recorded in net sales. |
4. |
Gain recognized in sundry incomenet was partially offset by the related gain on the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of the companys operations. See Note 6 for additional information. |
82
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
NOTE 19FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following tables summarize the bases used to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis:
December 31, 2017 (Successor) (In millions) |
Significant Other
Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
|||
Assets at fair value: |
||||
Cash equivalents 1 |
$ | 5,205 | ||
Marketable securities |
$ | 952 | ||
Derivatives relating to: 2 |
||||
Foreign currency |
46 | |||
|
|
|||
Total assets at fair value |
$ | 6,203 | ||
|
|
|||
Liabilities at fair value: |
||||
Long-term debt 3 |
$ | 11,560 | ||
Derivatives relating to: 2 |
||||
Foreign currency |
79 | |||
|
|
|||
Total liabilities at fair value |
$ | 11,639 | ||
|
|
1. |
Time deposits included in Cash and cash equivalents and money market funds included in Other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets are held at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. |
2. |
See Note 18 for the classification of derivatives in the consolidated balance sheets. |
3. |
See Note 13 for information on fair value measurements of long-term debt. |
December 31, 2016 (Predecessor) (In millions) |
Significant Other
Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
|||
Assets at fair value: |
||||
Cash equivalents 1 |
$ | 2,713 | ||
Marketable securities |
$ | 1,362 | ||
Derivatives relating to: 2 |
||||
Foreign currency |
182 | |||
|
|
|||
Total assets at fair value |
$ | 4,257 | ||
|
|
|||
Liabilities at fair value: |
||||
Long-term debt 3 |
$ | 8,464 | ||
Derivatives relating to: 2 |
||||
Foreign currency |
121 | |||
|
|
|||
Total liabilities at fair value |
$ | 8,585 | ||
|
|
1. |
Time deposits included in Cash and cash equivalents and money market funds included in Other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets are held at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. |
2. |
See Note 18 for the classification of derivatives in the consolidated balance sheets. |
3. |
See Note 13 for information on fair value measurements of long-term debt. |
83
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
For assets and liabilities classified as Level 1 measurements (measured using quoted prices in active markets), total fair value is either the price of the most recent trade at the time of the market close or the official close price, as defined by the exchange on which the asset is most actively traded on the last trading day of the period, multiplied by the number of units held without consideration of transaction costs.
For assets and liabilities classified as Level 2 measurements, where the security is frequently traded in less active markets, fair value is based on the closing price at the end of the period; where the security is less frequently traded, fair value is based on the price a dealer would pay for the security or similar securities, adjusted for any terms specific to that asset or liability, or by using observable market data points of similar, more liquid securities to imply the price. For time deposits classified as held-to-maturity investments and reported at amortized cost, fair value is based on an observable interest rate for similar securities. Market inputs are obtained from well-established and recognized vendors of market data and subjected to tolerance and quality checks.
For derivative assets and liabilities, standard industry models are used to calculate the fair value of the various financial instruments based on significant observable market inputs, such as foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, swap rates, interest rates and implied volatilities obtained from various market sources. Market inputs are obtained from well-established and recognized vendors of market data and subjected to tolerance/quality checks.
For all other assets and liabilities for which observable inputs are used, fair value is derived through the use of fair value models, such as a discounted cash flow model or other standard pricing models. See Note 18 for further information on the types of instruments used by the company for risk management.
There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
For assets classified as Level 3 measurements, the fair value is based on significant unobservable inputs including assumptions where there is little, if any, market activity. The fair value of the companys interests held in trade receivable conduits is determined by calculating the expected amount of cash to be received using the key input of anticipated credit losses in the portfolio of receivables sold that have not yet been collected. Given the short-term nature of the underlying receivables, discount rate and prepayments are not factors in determining the fair value of the interests.
84
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
NOTE 20GEOGRAPHIC AND PRODUCT LINE INFORMATION
Sales are attributed to geographic areas based on customer location; long-lived assets are attributed to geographic areas based on asset location.
Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Sept 1 -
Dec 31, 2017 |
Jan 1 -
Aug 31, 2017 |
Year Ended
Dec 31, 2016 |
Year Ended
Dec 31, 2015 |
||||||||||||
United States |
$ | 2,086 | $ | 7,535 | $ | 9,500 | $ | 9,812 | ||||||||
Canada |
139 | 583 | 669 | 692 | ||||||||||||
EMEA 1 |
1,689 | 3,927 | 5,251 | 5,483 | ||||||||||||
Asia Pacific 2 |
2,047 | 3,844 | 5,407 | 5,292 | ||||||||||||
Latin America |
1,092 | 1,392 | 2,382 | 2,378 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,053 | $ | 17,281 | $ | 23,209 | $ | 23,657 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). |
2. |
Net sales for China in the Successor period were $818 million . Net sales for China were less than 10 percent of consolidated net sales in all Predecessor periods. |
Net Property | ||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||
(In millions) |
2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||
United States |
$ | 7,708 | $ | 5,951 | $ | 6,458 | ||||||
Canada |
170 | 124 | 128 | |||||||||
EMEA 1 |
2,867 | 1,550 | 1,582 | |||||||||
Asia Pacific |
1,120 | 797 | 854 | |||||||||
Latin America |
570 | 429 | 392 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 12,435 | $ | 8,851 | $ | 9,414 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). |
Net Sales by Principal Product Line
Effective with the Merger, DuPonts business activities are components of its parent companys business operations. DuPonts business activities, including the assessment of performance and allocation of resources, are reviewed and managed by DowDuPont. Information used by the chief operating decision maker of DuPont relates to the company in its entirety. Accordingly, there are no separate reportable business segments for DuPont under ASC Topic 280 Segment Reporting and DuPonts business results are reported in this Form 10-K as a single operating segment. Prior years segment information has been made to conform to the current presentation.
85
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
The company has one reportable segment with the following principal product lines: agriculture, packaging and specialty plastics, electronics and imaging, nutrition and health, industrial biosciences, transportation and advanced polymers and safety and construction. Net sales by principal product line are included below:
Net Sales (In millions) |
Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||||
For the Period
September 1 through December 31, 2017 |
For the Period
January 1 through August 31, 2017 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2016 |
For the Year
Ended December 31, 2015 |
|||||||||||||
Agriculture |
$ | 1,596 | $ | 6,894 | $ | 8,131 | $ | 8,327 | ||||||||
Packaging and Specialty Plastics |
544 | 1,072 | 1,651 | 1,715 | ||||||||||||
Electronics and Imaging |
743 | 1,422 | 1,960 | 2,070 | ||||||||||||
Nutrition and Health |
1,165 | 2,129 | 3,268 | 3,256 | ||||||||||||
Industrial Biosciences |
573 | 1,022 | 1,500 | 1,478 | ||||||||||||
Transportation and Advanced Polymers |
1,355 | 2,608 | 3,599 | 3,591 | ||||||||||||
Safety and Construction |
1,074 | 2,134 | 3,099 | 3,220 | ||||||||||||
Other |
3 | | 1 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 7,053 | $ | 17,281 | $ | 23,209 | $ | 23,657 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 21QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Predecessor | Successor | |||||||||||||||||||
In millions, except per share amounts (unaudited) |
First | Second |
July 1 -
Aug 31 |
Sept 1 -
Sept 30 |
Fourth | |||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 7,319 | $ | 6,971 | $ | 2,991 | $ | 1,735 | $ | 5,318 | ||||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
4,209 | 4,021 | 1,975 | 1,511 | 2 | 4,654 | 2 | |||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset related chargesnet 1 |
152 | 160 | 11 | 40 | 140 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
1,121 | 3,4,5 | 869 | 3 | (229 | ) 3 | (295 | ) 1,3 | 1,305 | 1,3,6 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to DuPont |
1,113 | 862 | (234 | ) | (293 | ) | 1,303 | |||||||||||||
Earnings per common share, continuing operationsbasic 9 |
1.35 | 0.82 | (0.30 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings per common share, continuing operationsdiluted 9 |
1.34 | 0.82 | (0.30 | ) |
2016 | ||||||||||||||||
Predecessor | ||||||||||||||||
In millions, except per share amounts (unaudited) |
First | Second | Third | Fourth | ||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 7,014 | $ | 6,646 | $ | 4,646 | $ | 4,903 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
4,103 | 3,823 | 2,997 | 3,032 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset related chargesnet 1 |
78 | (88 | ) | 172 | 394 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
1,232 | 7,8 | 1,024 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 263 | 7 | ||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to DuPont |
1,226 | 1,020 | 2 | 265 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per common share, continuing operationsbasic 9 |
1.23 | 1.03 | (0.08 | ) | 0.19 | |||||||||||
Earnings per common share, continuing operationsdiluted 9 |
1.22 | 1.02 | (0.08 | ) | 0.19 |
1. |
See Note 5 for additional information. |
2. |
Includes charges of $(360) million and $(1,109) million during the period September 1 - September 30, 2017 and the fourth quarter 2017, respectively, related to the amortization of inventory step-up as a result of |
86
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
the Merger and the acquisition of the H&N Business, which was included in cost of goods sold. See Note 3 for additional information. |
3. |
Includes charges of $(170) million, $(201) million, $(210) million, $(71) million , and $(243) million in the first quarter 2017, second quarter 2017, the period July 1 - August 31, 2017, the period September 1 - September 30, 2017, and the fourth quarter 2017, respectively, related to transaction costs associated with the Merger. Predecessor costs are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses; Successor costs are recoded in integration and separation costs. See Note 3 for additional information. |
4. |
First quarter 2017 included a gain of $162 million recorded in sundry incomenet associated with the sale of the companys global food safety diagnostic business. See Note 4 for additional information. |
5. |
First quarter 2017 included a tax benefit of $53 million, as well as a $47 million benefit on associated accrued interest reversals (recorded in sundry incomenet), related to a reduction in the companys unrecognized tax benefits due to the closure of various tax statutes of limitations. |
6. |
Includes a tax benefit of $2,262 million in the fourth quarter 2017 related to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and a benefit related to an internal entity restructuring associated with the Intended Business Separations. See Note 7 for additional information. |
7. |
First, second, third and fourth quarter 2016 included charges of $(24) million, $(76) million, $(122) million, and $(164) million, respectively, recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses related to transaction costs associated with the Merger. See Note 3 for additional information. |
8. |
First quarter 2016 included a gain of $369 million recorded in sundry incomenet associated with the sale of the DuPont (Shenzhen) Manufacturing Limited entity, which held certain buildings and other assets. See Note 4 for additional information. |
9. |
Due to quarterly changes in the share count and the allocation of income to participating securities, the sum of the four quarters may not equal the earnings per share amount calculated for the year. |
In February 2018, the company entered into a new committed receivable repurchase facility of up to $1,300 million (the 2018 Repurchase Facility) which expires in December 2018. Under the 2018 Repurchase Facility, DuPont may sell a portfolio of available and eligible outstanding customer notes receivables within the agriculture product line to participating institutions and simultaneously agree to repurchase at a future date. The 2018 Repurchase Facility is considered a secured borrowing with the customer notes receivables inclusive of those that are sold and repurchased, equal to 105 percent of the outstanding amounts borrowed utilized as collateral. Borrowings under the 2018 Repurchase Facility will have an interest rate of LIBOR + 0.75 percent.
87
Exhibit 99.3
Item 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Income Statements (Unaudited)
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 8,545 | $ | 6,971 | $ | 15,244 | $ | 14,290 | ||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
5,669 | 3,963 | 10,516 | 8,115 | ||||||||||||
Other operating charges |
168 | 368 | ||||||||||||||
Research and development expense |
396 | 387 | 778 | 755 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
1,182 | 1,256 | 2,141 | 2,446 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
333 | 648 | ||||||||||||||
Restructuring and asset related chargesnet |
91 | 160 | 188 | 312 | ||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
327 | 582 | ||||||||||||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
194 | (132 | ) | 241 | 70 | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
86 | 99 | 166 | 183 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
655 | 806 | 466 | 2,181 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
141 | 84 | 168 | 281 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes |
514 | 722 | 298 | 1,900 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations after income taxes |
| 147 | (5 | ) | 90 | |||||||||||
Net income |
514 | 869 | 293 | 1,990 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
1 | 7 | 8 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to DuPont |
$ | 513 | $ | 862 | $ | 285 | $ | 1,975 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock from continuing operations |
$ | 0.82 | $ | 2.17 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock from discontinued operations |
0.17 | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share of common stock |
$ | 0.99 | $ | 2.27 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock from continuing operations |
$ | 0.82 | $ | 2.16 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock from discontinued operations |
0.17 | 0.10 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share of common stock |
$ | 0.99 | $ | 2.26 | ||||||||||||
Dividends declared per share of common stock |
$ | 0.38 | $ | 0.76 |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 6.
1
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 514 | $ | 869 | $ | 293 | $ | 1,990 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) incomenet of tax: |
||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
(1,923 | ) | 275 | (966 | ) | 653 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to pension benefit plans |
3 | 88 | 7 | 197 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments to other benefit plans |
| 3 | | 7 | ||||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
(16 | ) | (8 | ) | (5 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||
Total other comprehensive (loss) income |
(1,936 | ) | 358 | (964 | ) | 846 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income |
(1,422 | ) | 1,227 | (671 | ) | 2,836 | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interestsnet of tax |
1 | 7 | 8 | 15 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to DuPont |
$ | (1,423 | ) | $ | 1,220 | $ | (679 | ) | $ | 2,821 |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 6.
2
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)
Successor | ||||||||
(In millions, except share amounts) |
June 30,
2018 |
December 31,
2017 |
||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,421 | $ | 7,250 | ||||
Marketable securities |
374 | 952 | ||||||
Accounts and notes receivablenet |
7,734 | 5,239 | ||||||
Inventories |
6,303 | 8,633 | ||||||
Other current assets |
1,311 | 981 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
20,143 | 23,055 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates |
1,459 | 1,595 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipmentnet of accumulated depreciation (June 30, 2018$1,071; December 31, 2017$443) |
11,832 | 12,435 | ||||||
Goodwill |
45,510 | 45,589 | ||||||
Other intangible assets |
26,866 | 27,726 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
361 | 480 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,839 | 2,084 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Assets |
$ | 108,010 | $ | 112,964 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and Equity | ||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||
Short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations |
$ | 3,701 | $ | 2,779 | ||||
Accounts payable |
4,002 | 4,831 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
138 | 149 | ||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
3,024 | 4,384 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
10,865 | 12,143 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-Term Debt |
9,728 | 10,291 | ||||||
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
5,424 | 5,836 | ||||||
Pension and other post employment benefitsnoncurrent |
7,389 | 7,787 | ||||||
Other noncurrent obligations |
1,837 | 1,975 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total noncurrent liabilities |
24,378 | 25,889 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingent liabilities |
||||||||
Stockholders equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock, without par valuecumulative; 23,000,000 shares authorized; issued at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017: |
||||||||
$4.50 Series1,673,000 shares (callable at $120) |
169 | 169 | ||||||
$3.50 Series700,000 shares (callable at $102) |
70 | 70 | ||||||
Common stock, $.30 par value; 1,800,000,000 shares authorized; issued at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017100 |
| | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
74,845 | 74,727 | ||||||
(Accumulated deficit) Retained earnings |
(1,201 | ) | 175 | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(1,345 | ) | (381 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total DuPont stockholders equity |
72,538 | 74,760 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Noncontrolling interests |
229 | 172 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total equity |
72,767 | 74,932 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Liabilities and Equity |
$ | 108,010 | $ | 112,964 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 6.
3
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Successor | Predecessor | |||||||
(In millions) |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||
Operating activities |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 293 | $ | 1,990 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash used for operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,314 | 570 | ||||||
Provision for deferred income tax |
(99 | ) | ||||||
Net periodic pension (benefit) cost |
(163 | ) | 219 | |||||
Pension contributions |
(123 | ) | (2,994 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sales of property, businesses, consolidated companies, and investments |
(13 | ) | (202 | ) | ||||
Restructuring and asset related chargesnet |
188 | |||||||
Asset related charges |
279 | |||||||
Amortization of inventory step-up |
1,385 | |||||||
Other net loss |
248 | 279 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilitiesnet |
(4,621 | ) | (4,196 | ) | ||||
Cash used for operating activities |
(1,591 | ) | (4,055 | ) | ||||
Investing activities |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(601 | ) | (524 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property, businesses, and consolidated companiesnet of cash divested |
50 | 296 | ||||||
Investments in and loans to nonconsolidated affiliates |
| (22 | ) | |||||
Purchases of investments |
(991 | ) | (4,243 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments |
1,576 | 2,633 | ||||||
Foreign currency exchange contract settlements |
(29 | ) | ||||||
Other investing activitiesnet |
| (43 | ) | |||||
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
34 | (1,932 | ) | |||||
Financing activities |
||||||||
Change in short-term (less than 90 days) borrowings |
454 | 3,011 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
254 | 2,234 | ||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(272 | ) | (204 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
57 | 203 | ||||||
Dividends paid to stockholders |
(5 | ) | (664 | ) | ||||
Distributions to DowDuPont |
(1,658 | ) | ||||||
Other financing activities |
(41 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||
Cash (used for) provided by financing activities |
(1,211 | ) | 4,531 | |||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
(103 | ) | 105 | |||||
Change in cash classified as held for sale |
| (18 | ) | |||||
Decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
(2,871 | ) | (1,369 | ) | ||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period |
7,808 | 4,548 | ||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period |
$ | 4,937 | $ | 3,179 |
See Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page 6.
4
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Table of Contents
Note | Page | |||||
1 | 6 | |||||
2 | 8 | |||||
3 | 12 | |||||
4 | 17 | |||||
5 | 18 | |||||
6 | 20 | |||||
7 | 22 | |||||
8 | 22 | |||||
9 | 24 | |||||
10 | 25 | |||||
11 | 27 | |||||
12 | 27 | |||||
13 |
Short-Term Borrowings, Long-Term Debt and Available Credit Facilities |
28 | ||||
14 | 29 | |||||
15 | 34 | |||||
16 | 36 | |||||
17 | 36 | |||||
18 | 41 |
5
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Interim Financial Statements
The accompanying unaudited interim Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for interim periods have been included. Results for interim periods should not be considered indicative of results for a full year. These interim Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto contained in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, collectively referred to as the 2017 Annual Report. The interim Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the company and all of its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is maintained.
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
DowDuPont Inc. (DowDuPont) was formed on December 9, 2015 to effect an all-stock, merger of equals strategic combination between The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) and DuPont (the Merger Transaction). On August 31, 2017 at 11:59 pm ET, (the Merger Effectiveness Time) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 11, 2015, as amended on March 31, 2017 (the Merger Agreement), Dow and DuPont each merged with wholly owned subsidiaries of DowDuPont (Mergers) and, as a result of the Mergers, Dow and DuPont became subsidiaries of DowDuPont (collectively, the Merger). Prior to the Merger, DowDuPont did not conduct any business activities other than those required for its formation and matters contemplated by the Merger Agreement. DowDuPont intends to pursue, subject to certain customary conditions, including, among others, the effectiveness of registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and approval by the Board of Directors of DowDuPont, the separation of the combined companys agriculture business, specialty products business and materials science business through a series of tax-efficient transactions (collectively, the Intended Business Separations).
For purposes of DowDuPonts financial statement presentation, Dow was determined to be the accounting acquirer in the Merger and DuPonts assets and liabilities are reflected at fair value as of the Merger Effectiveness Time. In connection with the Merger and the related accounting determination, DuPont has elected to apply push-down accounting and reflect in its financial statements the fair value of its assets and liabilities. DuPonts interim Consolidated Financial Statements for periods following the close of the Merger are labeled Successor and reflect DowDuPonts basis in the fair values of the assets and liabilities of DuPont. All periods prior to the closing of the Merger reflect the historical accounting basis in DuPonts assets and liabilities and are labeled Predecessor. The interim Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes include a black line division between the columns titled Predecessor and Successor to signify that the amounts shown for the periods prior to and following the Merger are not comparable. See Note 3 for additional information on the Merger.
Transactions between DuPont and DowDuPont, Dow and their affiliates and other associated companies are reflected in the Successor consolidated financial statements and disclosed as related party transactions when material. Related party transactions with Dow and DowDuPont are included in Note 7.
As a condition of the regulatory approval for the Merger Transaction, the company was required to divest certain assets related to its crop protection business and research and development (R&D) organization, specifically the companys Cereal Broadleaf Herbicides and Chewing Insecticides portfolios, including Rynaxypyr ® , Cyazypyr ® and Indoxacarb as well as the crop protection R&D pipeline and organization, excluding seed treatment, nematicides, and late-stage R&D programs. On March 31, 2017, the company entered into a definitive agreement (the FMC Transaction Agreement) with FMC Corporation (FMC). Under the FMC Transaction
6
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Agreement, FMC would acquire the crop protection business and R&D assets that DuPont was required to divest in order to obtain European Commission (EC) approval of the Merger Transaction as described above, (the Divested Ag Business) and DuPont agreed to acquire certain assets relating to FMCs Health and Nutrition segment, excluding its Omega-3 products (the H&N Business) (collectively, the FMC Transactions).
On November 1, 2017, the company completed the FMC Transactions through the disposition of the Divested Ag Business and the acquisition of the H&N Business. The sale of the Divested Ag Business meets the criteria for discontinued operations and as such, results of operations are presented as discontinued operations and have been excluded from continuing operations for all periods presented. The sum of the individual earnings per share amounts from continuing operations and discontinued operations may not equal the total company earnings per share amounts due to rounding. The comprehensive income and cash flows related to the Divested Ag Business have not been segregated and are included in the interim Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income and interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, respectively, for all periods presented. Amounts related to the Divested Ag Business are consistently included or excluded from the Notes to the interim Consolidated Financial Statements based on the respective financial statement line item. See Note 4 for additional information.
Certain reclassifications of prior years data have been made to conform to current years presentation. As described in Note 2, effective January 1, 2018, the company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-07, CompensationRetirement Benefits (Topic 715), Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. In conjunction with the adoption of this ASU, the company retrospectively reclassified the non-service components of net periodic benefit cost in the interim Consolidated Income Statements. See Note 2 for more information.
Significant Accounting Policies
The company has updated its revenue recognition policy since issuance of its 2017 Annual Report as a result of the adoption of ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) in the first quarter 2018. See Notes 2 and 5 for additional information. See Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in the 2017 Annual Report for more information on DuPonts other significant accounting policies.
Revenue
The company recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services, in an amount that reflects the consideration which the company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for the arrangements that the company determines are within the scope of Topic 606, the company performs the following five steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. See Note 5 for additional information on revenue recognition.
Changes in Accounting and Reporting
Within the Successor periods, DuPont made the following changes in accounting and reporting to harmonize its accounting and reporting with DowDuPont.
Within the Successor periods of the interim Consolidated Income Statements:
|
Included royalty income within net sales. In the Predecessor periods, royalty income is included within sundry income (expense)net. |
7
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
Eliminated the other operating charges line item. In the Successor periods, a majority of these costs are included within cost of goods sold. These costs are also included in selling, general and administrative expenses and amortization of intangibles in the Successor periods. |
|
Presented amortization of intangibles as a separate line item. In the Predecessor periods, amortization is included within selling, general and administrative expenses, other operating charges, and research and development expenses. |
|
Presented integration and separation costs as a separate line item. In the Predecessor periods, these costs are included within selling, general and administrative expenses. |
|
Included interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes on continuing operations. In the Predecessor periods, interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits is included within sundry income (expense)net. |
Within the Successor period of the interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
|
Included foreign currency exchange contract settlements within cash flows from operating activities, regardless of hedge accounting qualification. In the Predecessor period, DuPont reflected non-qualified hedge programs, specifically forward contracts, options and cash collateral activity, within cash flows from investing activities. In the Predecessor period, DuPont reflected cash flows from qualified hedge programs within the line item to which the program related (i.e., revenue hedge cash flows presented within changes from accounts receivable). |
NOTE 2RECENT ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) which was further updated in March, April, May and December 2016, as well as September and November 2017. The new guidance clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for GAAP. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. The new standard resulted in additional disclosure requirements to describe the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or modified retrospective (cumulative-effect) transition method of adoption.
The company adopted this standard in the first quarter of 2018 and applied the modified retrospective transition method to contracts not completed at the date of initial application. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with historic accounting under Topic 605 (Revenue Recognition). The company recognized the cumulative effect of applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the beginning of 2018. See Note 5 for additional disclosures regarding the companys contracts with customers.
8
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
In accordance with Topic 606, the disclosure of the impact of adoption to the companys Consolidated Balance Sheet was as follows:
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
As Reported
December 31, 2017 |
Effect of
Adoption of ASU 2014-09 |
Updated
January 1, 2018 |
|||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||
Accounts and notes receivablenet |
$ | 5,239 | $ | 79 | $ | 5,318 | ||||||
Inventories |
8,633 | (53 | ) | 8,580 | ||||||||
Other current assets |
981 | 101 | 1,082 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
$ | 480 | $ | 1 | $ | 481 | ||||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 4,831 | $ | (3 | ) | $ | 4,828 | |||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
4,384 | 120 | 4,504 | |||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
$ | 5,836 | $ | 3 | $ | 5,839 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
$ | 175 | $ | 8 | $ | 183 |
The most significant changes as a result of adopting ASU No. 2014-09 relate to the reclassification of the companys return assets and refund liabilities in the agriculture product line on the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Under previous guidance, the company accrued the amount of expected product returns as a reduction of net sales and a reduction of accounts and notes receivablenet, and the value associated with the products expected to be recovered in inventory along with a corresponding reduction in cost of goods sold. Under Topic 606, the company now separately presents the amount of expected product returns as refund liabilities, included in accrued and other current liabilities, and the products expected to be recovered as return assets, included in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets. The reclassification of return assets and refund liabilities was $61 million and $119 million, respectively, at January 1, 2018.
The effect on the interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows was not material. The following table summarizes the effects of adopting the new accounting standard related to revenue recognition on the companys interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet:
June 30, 2018 | ||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
As
Reported |
Effect
of Change |
Balance
without Adoption of Topic 606 |
|||||||||
Current assets |
||||||||||||
Accounts and notes receivablenet |
$ | 7,734 | $ | (150 | ) | $ | 7,584 | |||||
Inventories |
6,303 | 57 | 6,360 | |||||||||
Other current assets |
1,311 | (119 | ) | 1,192 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
$ | 361 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 360 | |||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||||||
Current liabilities |
||||||||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
$ | 3,024 | $ | (168 | ) | $ | 2,856 | |||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
$ | 5,424 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 5,413 | |||||
Accumulated deficit |
$ | (1,201 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (1,235 | ) |
In accordance with Topic 606, the impact of adoption to the companys interim Consolidated Income Statements primarily related to the accounting for interest income from its customer financing arrangements in the
9
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
agriculture product line. Under previous guidance, the company recorded the interest income from these arrangements over the financing period within sundry income (expense)net. Under Topic 606, the company elected the practical expedient and does not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component for contracts where payment terms are one year or less. Accordingly, the entire arrangement consideration is recorded in net sales upon satisfaction of the performance obligation. Performance obligations for these arrangements are generally satisfied during the first half of the fiscal year, consistent with the North America growing season. The following tables summarize the effects of adopting the new accounting standard related to revenue recognition on the companys interim Consolidated Income Statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018:
For the Three Months Ended June
30, 2018
(Successor) |
||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
As Reported |
Effect of
Change |
Balance
without Adoption of Topic 606 |
|||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 8,545 | $ | (49 | ) | $ | 8,496 | |||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
$ | 194 | $ | 31 | $ | 225 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 655 | $ | (18 | ) | $ | 637 | |||||
Provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
$ | 141 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 137 | |||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes |
$ | 514 | $ | (14 | ) | $ | 500 |
For the Six Months Ended June
30, 2018
(Successor) |
||||||||||||
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
As Reported |
Effect of
Change |
Balance
without Adoption of Topic 606 |
|||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 15,244 | $ | (72 | ) | $ | 15,172 | |||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
$ | 241 | $ | 37 | $ | 278 | ||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 466 | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 431 | |||||
Provision for income taxes on continuing operations |
$ | 168 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 160 | |||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes |
$ | 298 | $ | (27 | ) | $ | 271 |
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The new guidance makes eight targeted changes to how cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The new guidance requires adoption on a retrospective basis unless it is impracticable to apply, in which case the company would be required to apply the amendments prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018 and there was no material impact.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. The new guidance requires that entities recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs, rather than when the asset is sold to an outside party. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the
10
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
beginning of an annual reporting period. The new guidance requires adoption on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018 and there was no adjustment to retained earnings.
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force), which clarifies how entities should present restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows, and, as a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. An entity with a material balance of restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents must disclose information about the nature of the restrictions. The company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018. See the interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the new presentation of restricted cash as well as Note 8 for a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (included in other current assets) presented on the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets to the total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash presented in the interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The new guidance narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. The guidance requires an entity to evaluate if substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; if so, the set of transferred assets and activities (collectively, the set) is not a business. To be considered a business, the set would need to include an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs, as defined by the ASU. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods, and should be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted. The company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018 and will apply it prospectively to all applicable transactions after the adoption date.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, CompensationRetirement Benefits (Topic 715), Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. The new guidance requires registrants to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item or items as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization in assets. Registrants will present the other components of net periodic benefit cost separately from the service cost component; and, the line item or items used in the income statement to present the other components of net periodic benefit cost must be disclosed. The new standard must be adopted retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic benefit cost in the income statement, and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in assets. The company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018, and will record the other components of net periodic benefit cost in sundry income (expense)net. The following tables summarize the reclassification of those costs from cost of goods sold, research and development expense, and selling, general and administrative expenses to sundry income (expense)net in the interim Consolidated Income Statements:
Summary of Changes to the interim
Consolidated
|
For the Three Months Ended June
30, 2017
(Predecessor) |
|||||||||||
(in millions) |
As Restated for
Discontinued Operations |
Effect of
Change |
Updated | |||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 4,021 | $ | (58 | ) | $ | 3,963 | |||||
Research and development expense |
$ | 402 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 387 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | 1,287 | $ | (31 | ) | $ | 1,256 | |||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
$ | (28 | ) | $ | (104 | ) | $ | (132 | ) |
11
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Summary of Changes to the interim
Consolidated
|
For the Six Months Ended June
30, 2017
(Predecessor) |
|||||||||||
(in millions) |
As Restated for
Discontinued Operations |
Effect of
Change |
Updated | |||||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 8,230 | $ | (115 | ) | $ | 8,115 | |||||
Research and development expense |
$ | 786 | $ | (31 | ) | $ | 755 | |||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | 2,508 | $ | (62 | ) | $ | 2,446 | |||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
$ | 278 | $ | (208 | ) | $ | 70 |
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The new guidance expands and refines hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and aligns the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged items in the financial statements. For cash flow and net investment hedges existing as of the date of adoption, an entity should apply a cumulative-effect adjustment related to eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which an entity adopts. Presentation and disclosure guidance is required to be adopted prospectively. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period. All transition requirements and elections should be applied to hedging relationships existing (that is, hedging relationships in which the hedging instrument has not expired, been sold, terminated, or exercised or the entity has not removed the designation of the hedging relationship) on the date of adoption. The effect of adoption should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The company early adopted the new guidance in the second quarter of 2018, and adoption did not have a material impact on the interim Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accounting Guidance Issued But Not Adopted as of June 30, 2018
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The amendments under the new guidance will require lessees to recognize almost all leases on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability, other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting. Lessor accounting is similar to the current model, but updated to align with certain changes to the lessee model and the new revenue recognition standard. The new leasing standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The new standard must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition, requiring application at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented. The company is working to quantify the impact and anticipates that the adoption of the new standard will result in a material increase in lease-related assets and liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The company is the lessee under various agreements for facilities and equipment that are currently accounted for as operating leases. A complete discussion of these leases is included in the companys 2017 Annual Report in Note 14, Commitments and Contingent Liabilities.
Merger with Dow
Upon completion of the Merger, (i) each share of common stock, par value $0.30 per share, of the company (the DuPont Common Stock) was converted into the right to receive 1.2820 fully paid and non-assessable shares of DowDuPont common stock, par value $0.01 per share, (DowDuPont Common Stock), in addition to cash in lieu of any fractional shares of DowDuPont Common Stock, and (ii) each share of DuPont Preferred Stock
12
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
$4.50 Series and DuPont Preferred Stock$3.50 Series (collectively DuPont Preferred Stock) issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Merger Effectiveness Time remains issued and outstanding and was unaffected by the Merger.
As provided in the Merger Agreement, at the Merger Effectiveness Time, all options relating to shares of DuPont Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger were generally automatically converted into options relating to shares of DowDuPont Common Stock and all restricted stock units and performance based restricted stock units relating to shares of DuPont Common Stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Mergers were generally automatically converted into restricted stock units relating to shares of DowDuPont Common Stock, in each case, after giving effect to appropriate adjustments to reflect the Mergers and otherwise generally on the same terms and conditions as applied under the applicable plans and award agreements immediately prior to the Merger Effectiveness Time.
Prior to the Merger, shares of DuPont Common Stock were registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE). As a result of the Merger, on August 31, 2017, the company requested that the NYSE withdraw the shares of DuPont Common Stock from listing on the NYSE and filed a Form 25 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to report that DuPont Common Stock is no longer listed on the NYSE. DuPont continues to have preferred stock outstanding and it remains listed on the NYSE. DowDuPont Common Stock is listed and trades on the NYSE, ticker symbol DWDP.
As a condition of the regulatory approval of the Merger, DuPont was required to divest a portion of its crop protection business, including certain research and development capabilities. See Note 4 for additional information.
Preliminary Allocation of Purchase Price
Based on an evaluation of the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 805, Business Combinations (ASC 805), Dow was determined to be the accounting acquirer in the Merger. DowDuPont has applied the acquisition method of accounting with respect to the assets and liabilities of DuPont, which have been measured at fair value as of the date of the Merger. In connection with the Merger and the related accounting determination, DuPont has elected to apply push-down accounting and reflect in its financial statements the fair value of assets and liabilities. Such fair values have been reflected in the Successor periods of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
DuPonts assets and liabilities were measured at estimated fair values as of the Merger Effectiveness Time, primarily using Level 3 inputs. Estimates of fair value represent managements best estimate which require a complex series of judgments about future events and uncertainties. Third-party valuation specialists were engaged to assist in the valuation of these assets and liabilities.
The total fair value of consideration transferred for the Merger was $74,680 million. Total consideration is comprised of the equity value of the DowDuPont shares as of the Merger Effectiveness Time that were issued in exchange for DuPont shares, the cash value for fractional shares, and the portion of DuPonts share awards and share options earned as of the Merger Effectiveness Time.
13
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The following table summarizes the fair value of consideration exchanged as a result of the Merger:
(In millions, except exchange ratio) |
||||
DuPont Common Stock outstanding as of the Merger Effectiveness Time |
868.3 | |||
DuPont exchange ratio |
1.2820 | |||
|
|
|||
DowDuPont Common Stock issued in exchange for DuPont Common Stock |
1,113.2 | |||
|
|
|||
Fair value of DowDuPont Common Stock issued 1 |
$ | 74,195 | ||
Fair value of DowDuPont equity awards issued in exchange for outstanding DuPont equity awards 2 |
485 | |||
|
|
|||
Total consideration |
$ | 74,680 | ||
|
|
1. |
Amount was determined based on the price per share of Dow Common Stock of $66.65 on August 31, 2017. |
2. |
Represents the fair value of replacement awards issued for DuPonts equity awards outstanding immediately before the Merger and attributable to the service periods prior to the Merger. The previous DuPont equity awards were converted into the right to receive 1.2820 shares of DowDuPont Common Stock. |
The acquisition method of accounting requires, among other things, that identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recognized on the balance sheet at their respective fair value as of the acquisition date. In determining the fair value, DowDuPont utilized various forms of the income, cost and market approaches depending on the asset or liability being fair valued. The estimation of fair value required significant judgments related to future net cash flows (including net sales, cost of products sold, selling and marketing costs, and working capital/contributory asset charges), discount rates reflecting the risk inherent in each cash flow stream, competitive trends, market comparables and other factors. Inputs were generally determined by taking into account historical data, supplemented by current and anticipated market conditions, and growth rates.
14
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The table below presents the preliminary fair value that was allocated to DuPonts assets and liabilities based upon fair values as determined by DowDuPont. The valuation process to determine the fair values is not yet complete. DuPont estimated the preliminary fair value of acquired assets and liabilities as of the Merger Effectiveness Time based on information currently available and continues to adjust those estimates upon refinement of market participant assumptions for integrating businesses, finalization of tax returns in the pre-merger period and application of push-down accounting at the subsidiary level. During the first half of 2018, DowDuPont made measurement period adjustments to reflect facts and circumstances in existence as of the Merger Effectiveness Time. These adjustments primarily included a $394 million increase in goodwill, a $230 million decrease in property, plant, and equipment, a $117 million decrease in indefinite-lived trademarks and trade names and customer-related assets, a $16 million decrease in assets held for sale, a $60 million increase in other current assets, a $56 million increase in noncontrolling interests and a $28 million decrease in investments in nonconsolidated affiliates. The preliminary fair values are substantially complete with the exception of identifiable intangible assets; property, plant, and equipment; income taxes; and goodwill. As DuPont finalizes the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed, additional purchase price adjustments may be recorded during the measurement period, but no later than one year from the date of the Merger. DuPont will reflect measurement period adjustments, if any, in the period in which the adjustments are recognized. Final determination of the fair values may result in further adjustments to the values presented in the following table.
(In millions) |
Estimated
fair value as adjusted |
|||
Fair Value of Assets as of the Merger Effectiveness Time |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,005 | ||
Marketable securities |
2,849 | |||
Accounts and notes receivable |
7,847 | |||
Inventories |
8,806 | |||
Other current assets |
420 | |||
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates |
1,626 | |||
Assets held for salecurrent |
3,732 | |||
Property, plant and equipment |
11,711 | |||
Goodwill |
45,499 | |||
Other intangible assets |
27,104 | |||
Deferred income tax assets |
284 | |||
Other assets |
2,066 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
$ | 115,949 | ||
|
|
15
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(In millions) |
Estimated
fair value as adjusted |
|||
Fair Value of Liabilities |
||||
Short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations |
$ | 5,319 | ||
Accounts payable |
3,298 | |||
Income taxes payable |
261 | |||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
3,517 | |||
Liabilities held for salecurrent |
125 | |||
Long-term debt |
9,878 | |||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
8,319 | |||
Pension and other post employment benefitsnoncurrent |
8,056 | |||
Other noncurrent obligations |
2,023 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities |
$ | 40,796 | ||
|
|
|||
Noncontrolling interests |
234 | |||
Preferred stock |
239 | |||
|
|
|||
Fair Value of Net Assets (Consideration for the Merger) |
$ | 74,680 | ||
|
|
Integration and Separation Costs
Integration and separation costs have been and are expected to be significant. These costs to date primarily have consisted of financial advisory, information technology, legal, accounting, consulting, and other professional advisory fees associated with the preparation and execution of activities related to the Merger and the Intended Business Separations. These costs are recorded within integration and separation costs in the Successor periods and within selling, general and administrative expenses in the Predecessor periods within the interim Consolidated Income Statements.
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Integration and separation costs |
$ | 327 | $ | 582 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
$ | 201 | $ | 371 |
H&N Business
On November 1, 2017, the company completed the FMC Transactions through the acquisition of the H&N Business and the divestiture of the Divested Ag Business. The acquisition is being integrated into the nutrition and health product line to enhance DuPonts position as a leading provider of sustainable, bio-based food ingredients and allow for expanded capabilities in the pharma excipients space. The company accounted for the acquisition in accordance with ASC 805, which requires the assets acquired and liabilities assumed to be recognized on the balance sheet at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The purchase accounting and purchase price allocation for the H&N Business are substantially complete. However, the company continues to refine the preliminary valuation of certain acquired assets, such as intangibles, deferred income taxes, and property, plant and equipment, which could impact the amount of residual goodwill recorded. The company will finalize the amounts recognized as it obtains the information necessary to complete the analysis, but no later than one year from the date of the acquisition. The preliminary fair value allocated to the assets acquired and
16
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
liabilities assumed for the H&N Business at November 1, 2017 was $1,970 million. There were no material updates to the purchase accounting and purchase price allocation for the six months ended June 30, 2018. For additional information regarding the acquisition of the H&N Business, see Note 3, Business Combinations, in the 2017 Annual Report.
NOTE 4DIVESTITURES AND OTHER TRANSACTIONS
Merger RemedyDivested Ag Business
On March 31, 2017, the company and FMC entered into the FMC Transaction Agreement. Under the FMC Transaction Agreement, and effective upon the closing of the transaction on November 1, 2017, FMC acquired the Divested Ag Business that DuPont was required to divest in order to obtain EC approval of the Merger Transaction and DuPont acquired the H&N Business. See further discussion of the FMC Transactions in Note 1. The sale of the Divested Ag Business meets the criteria for discontinued operations and as such, earnings are included within income (loss) from discontinued operations after income taxes for all periods presented.
For the six months ended June 30, 2018, the company recorded a loss from discontinued operations before income taxes related to the Divested Ag Business of $10 million ( $5 million after tax). The following table summarizes the results of operations of the Divested Ag Business presented as discontinued operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017:
Predecessor | ||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||
Net sales |
$ | 453 | $ | 877 | ||||
Cost of goods sold |
171 | 333 | ||||||
Other operating charges |
8 | 12 | ||||||
Research and development expenses |
39 | 71 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
61 | 100 | ||||||
Sundry incomenet |
7 | 7 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income from discontinued operations before income taxes |
181 | 368 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Provision for income taxes |
44 | 71 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income from discontinued operations after income taxes |
$ | 137 | $ | 297 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The following table presents depreciation and capital expenditures of the discontinued operations related to the Divested Ag Business:
Predecessor | ||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 8 | $ | 16 | ||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 4 | $ | 8 |
Food Safety Diagnostic Sale
In February 2017, the company completed the sale of global food safety diagnostics to Hygiena LLC. The sale resulted in a pre-tax gain of $162 million ( $86 million net of tax). The gain was recorded in sundry income
17
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(expense)net in the companys interim Consolidated Income Statement for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Performance Chemicals
On July 1, 2015, DuPont completed the separation of its Performance Chemicals segment through the spin-off of all of the issued and outstanding stock of The Chemours Company (the Separation). In connection with the Separation, the company and The Chemours Company (Chemours) entered into a Separation Agreement (the Separation Agreement). Pursuant to the Separation Agreement and the amendment to the Separation Agreement, as discussed below, Chemours indemnifies DuPont against certain litigation, environmental, workers compensation and other liabilities that arose prior to the distribution. The term of this indemnification is generally indefinite and includes defense costs and expenses, as well as monetary and non-monetary settlements and judgments. In 2017, DuPont and Chemours amended the Separation Agreement to provide for a limited sharing of potential future perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) liabilities for a period of five years beginning July 6, 2017. In connection with the recognition of liabilities related to these matters, the company records an indemnification asset when recovery is deemed probable. At June 30, 2018, the indemnification assets are $87 million within accounts and notes receivablenet and $324 million within other assets along with the corresponding liabilities of $87 million within accrued and other current liabilities and $324 million within other noncurrent obligations in the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet. See Note 14 for further discussion of the amendment to the Separation Agreement and certain litigation and environmental matters indemnified by Chemours.
Income from discontinued operations after taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2017 includes a tax benefit of $10 million associated with an adjustment to the tax benefit recognized in the first quarter of 2017 related to the charge for the PFOA multidistrict litigation settlement. Income from discontinued operations after income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2017 includes a charge of $335 million ( $214 million net of tax) in connection with the PFOA multi-district litigation settlement. See Note 14 for further discussion.
Revenue Recognition
Products
Substantially all of DuPonts revenue is derived from product sales. Product sales consist of sales of DuPonts products to supply manufacturers, distributors, and farmers. DuPont considers purchase orders, which in some cases are governed by master supply agreements, to be a contract with a customer. Contracts with customers are considered to be short-term when the time between order confirmation and satisfaction of the performance obligations is equal to or less than one year.
Revenue from product sales is recognized when the customer obtains control of the companys product, which occurs at a point in time according to shipping terms. Payment terms for contracts related to product lines other than agriculture generally average 30 to 60 days after invoicing, depending on business and geography. Payment terms for agriculture product line contracts are generally less than one year from invoicing. The company elected the practical expedient and will not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component when DuPont expects it will be one year or less between when a customer obtains control of the companys product and when payment is due. The company has elected to recognize shipping and handling activities when control has transferred to the customer as an expense in cost of goods sold. Taxes collected from customers relating to product sales and remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from revenues. In addition, DuPont elected the practical expedient to expense any costs to obtain contracts as incurred, as the amortization period for these costs would have been one year or less.
18
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The transaction price includes estimates of variable consideration, such as rights of return, rebates, and discounts, that are reductions in revenue. All estimates are based on the companys historical experience, anticipated performance, and the companys best judgment at the time the estimate is made. Estimates for variable consideration are reassessed each reporting period and are included in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur upon resolution of uncertainty associated with the variable consideration. The majority of contracts have a single performance obligation satisfied at a point in time and the transaction price is stated in the contract, usually as quantity times price per unit. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, DuPont allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation based on the relative standalone selling price. The standalone selling price is the observable price which depicts the price as if sold to a similar customer in similar circumstances.
Licenses of Intellectual Property
DuPont enters into licensing arrangements with customers under which it licenses its intellectual property, such as patents and trademarks. Revenue from the majority of intellectual property licenses is derived from sales-based royalties. The company estimates the expected amount of sales-based royalties based on historical sales by customer. Revenue for licensing agreements that contain sales-based royalties is recognized at the later of (i) when the subsequent sale occurs or (ii) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated is satisfied.
Contract Balances
Contract liabilities primarily reflect deferred revenue from prepayments under agriculture product line contracts with customers where the company receives advance payments for products to be delivered in future periods. DuPont classifies deferred revenue as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when the company expects to recognize revenue. Contract assets primarily include amounts related to contractual rights to consideration for completed performance not yet invoiced within the industrial biosciences product line. Accounts receivable are recorded when the right to consideration becomes unconditional.
Contract Balances |
June
30,
2018 |
Topic 606
Adjustments January 1, 2018 |
December
31,
2017 |
|||||||||
(In millions) |
||||||||||||
Accounts and notes receivabletrade 1 |
$ | 6,428 | $ | 87 | $ | 3,976 | ||||||
Contract assetscurrent 2 |
$ | 62 | $ | 40 | $ | | ||||||
Deferred revenuecurrent 3 |
$ | 392 | $ | 2 | $ | 2,014 | ||||||
Deferred revenuenoncurrent 4 |
$ | 42 | $ | | $ | 48 |
1. |
Included in accounts and notes receivablenet in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
2. |
Included in other current assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
3. |
Included in accrued and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
4. |
Included in other noncurrent obligations in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
The change in deferred revenue from December 31, 2017 to June 30, 2018 was substantially due to the timing of agriculture product line seed deliveries to customers for the North America growing season . Revenue recognized during the six months ended June 30, 2018 from amounts included in deferred revenue at the beginning of the period was $1,815 million.
Disaggregation of Revenue
Effective with the Merger, DuPonts business activities are components of DowDuPonts business operations. DuPonts business activities, including the assessment of performance and allocation of resources, are reviewed
19
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
and managed by DowDuPont. Information used by the chief operating decision maker of DuPont relates to the company in its entirety. Accordingly, there are no separate reportable business segments for DuPont under ASC 280 Segment Reporting and DuPonts business results are reported in this Form 10-Q as a single operating segment.
The company has one reportable segment with the following principal product lines: agriculture, packaging and specialty plastics, electronics and imaging, nutrition and health, industrial biosciences, transportation and advanced polymers and safety and construction. The company believes disaggregation of revenue by principal product line best depicts the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of its revenue and cash flows. Net sales by principal product line are included below:
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
||||||
Agriculture |
$ | 4,058 | $ | 6,401 | ||||
Packaging and Specialty Plastics |
416 | 835 | ||||||
Electronics and Imaging |
553 | 1,080 | ||||||
Nutrition and Health |
1,057 | 2,081 | ||||||
Industrial Biosciences |
429 | 835 | ||||||
Transportation and Advanced Polymers |
1,142 | 2,263 | ||||||
Safety and Construction |
889 | 1,744 | ||||||
Other |
1 | 5 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 8,545 | $ | 15,244 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Sales are attributed to geographic regions based on customer location. Net sales by geographic region are included below:
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
||||||
U.S. & Canada |
$ | 4,755 | $ | 7,270 | ||||
EMEA 1 |
1,564 | 3,730 | ||||||
Asia Pacific |
1,737 | 3,272 | ||||||
Latin America |
489 | 972 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 8,545 | $ | 15,244 | ||||
|
|
|
|
1. |
Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EMEA). |
NOTE 6RESTRUCTURING AND ASSET RELATED CHARGESNET
DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program
In September and November 2017, DowDuPont and the company approved post-merger restructuring actions under the DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program (the Synergy Program), adopted by the DowDuPont Board of Directors. The Synergy Program is designed to integrate and optimize the organization following the Merger and in preparation for the Intended Business Separations. Based on all actions approved to date under the Synergy Program, DuPont expects to record total pre-tax restructuring charges of $430 million to $600 million, comprised
20
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
of approximately $320 million to $360 million of severance and related benefits costs; $110 million to $140 million of costs related to contract terminations; and up to $100 million of asset related charges. The Synergy Program includes certain asset actions that are reflected in the preliminary fair value measurement of DuPonts assets as of the Merger Effectiveness Time. Current estimated total pre-tax restructuring charges could be impacted by future adjustments to the preliminary fair value of DuPonts assets.
As a result of these actions, the company recorded pre-tax restructuring charges of $187 million for the period September 1 through December 31, 2017, consisting of severance and related benefit costs of $153 million, contract termination costs of $31 million and asset related charges of $3 million.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, the company recorded pre-tax charges of $94 million and $191 million, respectively, recognized in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in the companys interim Consolidated Income Statements. The charge for the three months ended June 30, 2018 is comprised of severance and related benefit costs of $84 million, contract termination costs of $4 million and asset-related charges of $6 million. The charge for the six months ended June 30, 2018, is comprised of severance and related benefit costs of $152 million, contract termination costs of $33 million and asset-related charges of $6 million. Substantially all of the remaining restructuring charges are expected to be incurred in 2018 and the related actions, including employee separations, associated with this plan are expected to be substantially complete by the end of 2019.
DuPont account balances and activity for the Synergy Program are summarized below:
(In millions) |
Severance
and Related Benefit Costs |
Contract
Termination Charges |
Asset-
Related Charges |
Total | ||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
$ | 133 | $ | 28 | $ | | $ | 161 | ||||||||
Charges to income from continuing operations for the six months ended June 30, 2018 |
152 | 33 | 6 | 191 | ||||||||||||
Payments |
(57 | ) | (28 | ) | | (85 | ) | |||||||||
Net translation adjustment |
(2 | ) | | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Asset write-offs |
| | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2018 |
$ | 226 | $ | 33 | $ | | $ | 259 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 Restructuring Program
At June 30, 2018, total liabilities related to the program were $10 million. The actions associated with this plan were substantially complete in 2017. A complete discussion of restructuring initiatives is included in the companys 2017 Annual Report in Note 5, Restructuring and Asset Related ChargesNet.
The company incurred pre-tax charges of $160 million and $312 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, recognized in restructuring and asset related chargesnet in the companys interim Consolidated Income Statements. The charge for the three months ended June 30, 2017 is comprised of $160 million of asset related charges. The charge for the six months ended June 30, 2017 is comprised of $279 million of asset-related charges and $33 million in severance and related benefit costs. The asset related charges mainly consist of accelerated depreciation associated with the closure of the safety and construction product line at the Cooper River manufacturing site located near Charleston, South Carolina.
21
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Services Provided by and to Dow and its affiliates
Following the Merger, DuPont reports transactions with Dow and its affiliates as related party transactions. The table below presents revenue earned and expenses incurred in transactions with Dow and its affiliates following the Merger. DuPont sells to and procures from Dow and its affiliates certain feedstocks and raw materials that are consumed in each companys manufacturing process, as well as finished goods.
Successor | ||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
||||||
Net sales |
$ | 34 | $ | 78 | ||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 39 | $ | 63 |
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, purchases from Dow and its affiliates were $64 million and $107 million, respectively.
Transactions with DowDuPont
DowDuPont relies on distributions and other intercompany transfers from DuPont and Dow to fund payment of its costs and expenses. In November 2017, DowDuPonts Board of Directors authorized an initial $4,000 million share repurchase program to buy back shares of DowDuPont common stock. In February and May 2018, the Board declared first and second quarter dividends per share of DowDuPont common stock payable on March 15, 2018 and June 15, 2018, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, DuPont declared and paid distributions to DowDuPont of about $1,658 million , primarily to fund a portion of DowDuPonts first and second quarter share repurchases and dividend payments.
In addition, at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, DuPont had a payable to DowDuPont of $391 million and $354 million, respectively, included in accounts payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets related to its estimated 2017 and 2018 tax liability. See Note 9 for additional information.
NOTE 8SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Sundry Income (Expense)Net |
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | ||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Royalty income 1 |
$ | 28 | $ | 73 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 30 | 32 | 58 | 57 | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of affiliatesnet |
19 | 24 | 33 | 42 | ||||||||||||
Net gain on sales of businesses and other assets 2 |
11 | 11 | 13 | 203 | ||||||||||||
Net exchange gains (losses) |
23 | (140 | ) | (109 | ) | (199 | ) | |||||||||
Non-operating pension and other post employment benefit credit (cost) 3 |
95 | (104 | ) | 187 | (208 | ) | ||||||||||
Miscellaneous income and expensesnet 4 |
16 | 17 | 59 | 102 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Sundry income (expense)net |
$ | 194 | $ | (132 | ) | $ | 241 | $ | 70 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
1. |
In the Successor periods, royalty income of $44 million and $85 million is included in net sales for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. |
2. |
Includes a pre-tax gain of $162 million ( $86 million net of tax) for the six months ended June 30, 2017 related to the sale of global food safety diagnostics. See Note 4 for additional information. |
3. |
Includes non-service related components of net periodic benefit credits (costs) (interest cost, expected return on plan assets, amortization of unrecognized (gain) loss, amortization of prior service benefit, and curtailment/settlement gain). See Note 2 for discussion of the retrospective adoption of ASU No. 2017-07. |
4. |
Miscellaneous income and expensesnet, includes interest items (Predecessor periods only), gains related to litigation settlements, and other items. |
The following table summarizes the impacts of the companys foreign currency hedging program on the companys results of operations. The company routinely uses foreign currency exchange contracts to offset its net exposures, by currency, related to the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities. The objective of this program is to maintain an approximately balanced position in foreign currencies in order to minimize, on an after-tax basis, the effects of exchange rate changes on net monetary asset positions. The hedging program gains (losses) are largely taxable (tax deductible) in the United States (U.S.), whereas the offsetting exchange gains (losses) on the remeasurement of the net monetary asset positions are often not taxable (tax deductible) in their local jurisdictions. The net pre-tax exchange gains (losses) are recorded in sundry income (expense)net and the related tax impact is recorded in provision for income taxes on continuing operations in the interim Consolidated Income Statements.
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Subsidiary Monetary Position (Losses) Gains |
||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax exchange losses |
$ | (154 | ) | $ | (54 | ) | $ | (105 | ) | $ | (28 | ) | ||||
Local tax (expenses) benefits |
(8 | ) | 94 | 24 | 130 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net after-tax impact from subsidiary exchange (losses) gains |
$ | (162 | ) | $ | 40 | $ | (81 | ) | $ | 102 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Hedging Program Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax exchange gains (losses) 1 |
$ | 177 | $ | (86 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (171 | ) | |||||
Tax (expenses) benefits |
(41 | ) | 31 | 1 | 61 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net after-tax impact from hedging program exchange gains (losses) |
$ | 136 | $ | (55 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (110 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total Exchange Gains (Losses) |
||||||||||||||||
Pre-tax exchange gains (losses) |
$ | 23 | $ | (140 | ) | $ | (109 | ) | $ | (199 | ) | |||||
Tax (expenses) benefits |
(49 | ) | 125 | 25 | 191 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net after-tax exchange losses |
$ | (26 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | (84 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Includes a $(50) million foreign exchange loss for the six months ended June 30, 2018 related to adjustments to foreign currency exchange contracts as a result of U.S. tax reform. |
23
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (included in other current assets) presented in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets to the total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash presented in the interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Successor | ||||||||
(In millions) |
June
30,
2018 |
December
31,
2017 |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4,421 | $ | 7,250 | ||||
Restricted cash |
516 | 558 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash |
$ | 4,937 | $ | 7,808 | ||||
|
|
|
|
DuPont entered into a trust agreement in 2013 (as amended and restated in 2017), establishing and requiring DuPont to fund a trust (the Trust) for cash obligations under certain non-qualified benefit and deferred compensation plans upon a change in control event as defined in the Trust agreement. Under the Trust agreement, the consummation of the Merger was a change in control event. Restricted cash at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 is related to the Trust.
Accounts and Notes ReceivableNet
Accounts and notes receivablenet was $7,734 million at June 30, 2018 and $5,239 million at December 31, 2017. Notes receivable, which is a component of accounts and notes receivablenet, was $1,615 million at June 30, 2018 and $199 million at December 31, 2017. The increase was primarily due to normal seasonality in the sales and cash collections cycle in the agriculture product line.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (The Act) was enacted. The Act reduces the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax (transition tax) on earnings of foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred, creates new provisions related to foreign sourced earnings, eliminates the domestic manufacturing deduction and moves towards a territorial system. At June 30, 2018, the company had not completed its accounting for the tax effects of The Act; however, as described below, the company has made reasonable estimates of the effects on its existing deferred tax balances and the one-time transition tax. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (SAB 118), during the measurement period, income tax effects of the Act may be refined upon obtaining, preparing, or analyzing additional information, and such changes could be material. During the measurement period, provisional amounts may also be adjusted for the effects, if any, of interpretive guidance issued by U.S. regulatory and standard-setting bodies.
|
As a result of The Act, the company remeasured its U.S. federal deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21 percent. However, the company is still analyzing certain aspects of The Act and refining its calculations. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, charges of $7 million and $55 million, respectively, were recorded to provision for income taxes on continuing operations in the companys interim Consolidated Income Statements to adjust the provisional amount related to the remeasurement of the companys deferred tax balance, resulting in a benefit of $(2,661) million since the enactment of The Act. |
|
The Act requires a mandatory deemed repatriation of post-1986 undistributed foreign earnings and profits (E&P), which results in a one-time transition tax. The company has not yet completed its calculation of the total post-1986 foreign E&P for its foreign subsidiaries as E&P will not be finalized until the Federal income tax return is filed. The company has not recorded a change to the $715 million provisional charge recorded during the fourth quarter 2017 with respect to the one-time transition tax. |
24
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
|
In the six months ended June 30, 2018, the company recognized a charge of $16 million to provision for income taxes on continuing operations in the companys interim Consolidated Income Statements as a result of an indirect impact of the Act related to certain inventory. |
|
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, The Act introduces new provisions for U.S. taxation of certain global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI). The company is evaluating the policy election on whether the additional liability will be recorded in the period in which it is incurred or recognized for the basis differences that would be expected to reverse in future years. |
DuPont and its subsidiaries are included in DowDuPonts consolidated federal income tax group and consolidated tax return. Generally, the consolidated tax liability of the DowDuPont U.S. tax group for each year will be apportioned among the members of the consolidated group based on each members separate taxable income. DuPont and Dow intend that to the extent Federal and/or State corporate income tax liabilities are reduced through the utilization of tax attributes of the other, settlement of any receivable and payable generated from the use of the other partys sub-group attributes will be in accordance with a tax sharing agreement and/or tax matters agreement.
Each year the company files hundreds of tax returns in the various national, state and local income taxing jurisdictions in which it operates. These tax returns are subject to examination and possible challenge by the tax authorities. Positions challenged by the tax authorities may be settled or appealed by the company. As a result, there is an uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the companys financial statements in accordance with accounting for income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The ultimate resolution of such uncertainties is not expected to have a material impact on the companys results of operations.
During the three months ended June 30, 2017, the company recognized tax expense of $29 million associated with the elimination of the U.S. domestic manufacturing deduction recorded in 2016 due to taxable income limitations triggered by the companys decision to deduct the second quarter 2017 principal U.S. pension plan contribution on its 2016 consolidated U.S. tax return.
Additionally, during the six months ended June 30, 2017, the company recognized a tax benefit of $57 million, as well as a $50 million pre-tax benefit on associated accrued interest reversals, related to a reduction in the companys unrecognized tax benefits due to the closure of various tax statutes of limitations. Income from continuing operations during the six months ended June 30, 2017 includes a tax benefit of $53 million and a pre-tax benefit of $47 million for accrued interest reversals (recorded in sundry income (expense)net). Income from discontinued operations during the six months ended June 30, 2017 includes a tax benefit of $4 million and a pre-tax benefit of $3 million for the accrued interest reversal.
NOTE 10EARNINGS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
Upon completion of the Merger, each share of DuPont Common Stock was converted into the right to receive 1.2820 fully paid and non-assessable shares of DowDuPont Common Stock, in addition to cash in lieu of any fractional shares of DowDuPont Common Stock issued and therefore earnings per share of common stock information is not presented for the Successor periods.
25
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Set forth below is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for basic and diluted earnings per share calculations for the Predecessor periods indicated below:
Predecessor | ||||||||
(In millions, except share amounts) |
Three Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes attributable to DuPont |
$ | 717 | $ | 1,888 | ||||
Preferred dividends |
(3 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income from continuing operations after income taxes available to DuPont common stockholders |
714 | 1,883 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income from discontinued operations after income taxes available to DuPont common stockholders |
145 | 87 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 859 | $ | 1,970 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstandingBasic |
868,481,000 | 867,496,000 | ||||||
Dilutive effect of the companys employee compensation plans |
4,269,000 | 4,424,000 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Weighted-average number of common shares outstandingDiluted |
872,750,000 | 871,920,000 |
The following average number of stock options were antidilutive, and therefore not included in the dilutive earnings per share calculations:
Predecessor | ||||||||
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
|||||||
Average number of stock options |
| 3,000 |
26
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Successor | ||||||||
(In millions) |
June
30,
2018 |
December
31,
2017 |
||||||
Finished products |
$ | 3,645 | $ | 4,500 | ||||
Semi-finished products |
1,300 | 2,769 | ||||||
Raw materials |
520 | 371 | ||||||
Stores and supplies |
306 | 447 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 5,771 | $ | 8,087 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Adjustment of inventories to a last-in, first out (LIFO) basis |
532 | 546 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total inventories |
$ | 6,303 | $ | 8,633 | ||||
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill
The following table summarizes changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2018:
(In millions) |
||||
Balance as of December 31, 2017 |
$ | 45,589 | ||
Currency translation adjustment |
(484 | ) | ||
Measurement period adjustmentsMerger |
394 | |||
Measurement period adjustmentsH&N Business |
11 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance as of June 30, 2018 |
$ | 45,510 | ||
|
|
Other Intangible Assets
The gross carrying amounts and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets by major class are as follows:
Successor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross |
Accumulated
Amortization |
Net | Gross |
Accumulated
Amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets subject to amortization (Definite-lived): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer-related |
$ | 9,412 | $ | (469 | ) | $ | 8,943 | $ | 9,502 | $ | (186 | ) | $ | 9,316 | ||||||||||
Developed technology |
4,497 | (390 | ) | 4,107 | 4,364 | (144 | ) | 4,220 | ||||||||||||||||
Trademarks/trade names |
1,086 | (70 | ) | 1,016 | 1,117 | (26 | ) | 1,091 | ||||||||||||||||
Favorable supply contracts |
475 | (64 | ) | 411 | 495 | (17 | ) | 478 | ||||||||||||||||
Microbial cell factories |
391 | (14 | ) | 377 | 397 | (6 | ) | 391 | ||||||||||||||||
Other 1 |
378 | (20 | ) | 358 | 459 | (10 | ) | 449 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other intangible assets with finite lives |
16,239 | (1,027 | ) | 15,212 | 16,334 | (389 | ) | 15,945 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Successor | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
June 30, 2018 | December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross |
Accumulated
Amortization |
Net | Gross |
Accumulated
Amortization |
Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets not subject to amortization (Indefinite-lived): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
In-process research and development (IPR&D) |
630 | | 630 | 660 | | 660 | ||||||||||||||||||
Germplasm 2 |
6,265 | | 6,265 | 6,265 | | 6,265 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks / trade names |
4,759 | | 4,759 | 4,856 | | 4,856 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total other intangible assets |
11,654 | | 11,654 | 11,781 | | 11,781 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 27,893 | $ | (1,027 | ) | $ | 26,866 | $ | 28,115 | $ | (389 | ) | $ | 27,726 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Primarily consists of sales and farmer networks, marketing and manufacturing alliances and noncompetition agreements. |
2. |
Germplasm is the pool of genetic source material and body of knowledge gained from the development and delivery stage of plant breeding. The company recognized germplasm as an intangible asset upon the acquisition of Pioneer. This intangible asset is expected to contribute to cash flows beyond the foreseeable future and there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, or other factors which limit its useful life. |
The aggregate pre-tax amortization expense from continuing operations for definite-lived intangible assets was $333 million and $648 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $57 million and $108 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. The estimated aggregate pre-tax amortization expense from continuing operations for the remainder of 2018 and each of the next five years is approximately $618 million, $1,254 million, $1,244 million, $1,228 million, $1,221 million and $1,207 million, respectively.
NOTE 13SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, LONG-TERM DEBT AND AVAILABLE CREDIT FACILITIES
Repurchase Facility
In February 2018, the company entered into a new committed receivable repurchase facility of up to $1,300 million (the 2018 Repurchase Facility) which expires in December 2018. From time to time, the company and the banks modify the monthly commitment amounts to better align with working capital requirements. Under the 2018 Repurchase Facility, DuPont may sell a portfolio of available and eligible outstanding agriculture product line customer notes receivables to participating institutions and simultaneously agree to repurchase at a future date. The 2018 Repurchase Facility is considered a secured borrowing with the customer notes receivable inclusive of those that are sold and repurchased, equal to 105 percent of the outstanding amounts borrowed utilized as collateral. Borrowings under the 2018 Repurchase Facility have an interest rate of LIBOR + 0.75 percent.
As of June 30, 2018, $1,208 million of notes receivable, recorded in accounts and notes receivablenet, were pledged as collateral against outstanding borrowings under the 2018 Repurchase Facility of $1,150 million, recorded in short-term borrowings and capital lease obligations on the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Term Loan and Revolving Credit Facilities
In March 2016, the company entered into a credit agreement that provides for a three-year, senior unsecured term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $4,500 million (as may be amended, from time to time, the
28
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Term Loan Facility) under which DuPont may make up to seven term loan borrowings and amounts repaid or prepaid are not available for subsequent borrowings. The proceeds from the borrowings under the Term Loan Facility will be used for the companys general corporate purposes including debt repayment, working capital and funding a portion of DowDuPonts costs and expenses. The Term Loan Facility was amended in 2018 to extend the maturity date to June 2020, at which time all outstanding borrowings, including accrued but unpaid interest, become immediately due and payable, and to extend the date on which the commitment to lend terminates to June 2019. At June 30, 2018, the company had made three term loan borrowings in an aggregate principal amount of $1,500 million and had unused commitments of $3,000 million under the Term Loan Facility.
In addition, in 2018 the company amended its $3,000 million revolving credit facility to extend the maturity date to June 2020.
NOTE 14COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Guarantees
Indemnifications
In connection with acquisitions and divestitures as of June 30, 2018, the company has indemnified respective parties against certain liabilities that may arise in connection with these transactions and business activities prior to the completion of the transactions. The term of these indemnifications, which typically pertain to environmental, tax and product liabilities, is generally indefinite. In addition, the company indemnifies its duly elected or appointed directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law, against liabilities incurred as a result of their activities for the company, such as adverse judgments relating to litigation matters. If the indemnified party were to incur a liability or have a liability increase as a result of a successful claim, pursuant to the terms of the indemnification, the company would be required to reimburse the indemnified party. The maximum amount of potential future payments is generally unlimited.
Obligations for Equity Affiliates & Others
The company has directly guaranteed various debt obligations under agreements with third parties related to equity affiliates, and customers. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the company had directly guaranteed $292 million and $297 million, respectively, of such obligations. These amounts represent the maximum potential amount of future (undiscounted) payments that the company could be required to make under the guarantees. The company would be required to perform on these guarantees in the event of default by the guaranteed party.
The company assesses the payment/performance risk by assigning default rates based on the duration of the guarantees. These default rates are assigned based on the external credit rating of the counterparty or through internal credit analysis and historical default history for counterparties that do not have published credit ratings. For counterparties without an external rating or available credit history, a cumulative average default rate is used.
In certain cases, the company has recourse to assets held as collateral, as well as personal guarantees from customers. Assuming liquidation, these assets are estimated to cover approximately 24 percent of the $89 million of guaranteed obligations of customers. Set forth below are the companys guaranteed obligations at June 30, 2018.
29
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
The following tables provide a summary of the final expiration year and maximum future payments for each type of guarantee:
Guarantees at June 30, 2018 (Successor) (In millions) |
Final
Expiration Year |
Maximum
Future Payments |
||||||
Obligations for customers 1 : |
||||||||
Bank borrowings |
2022 | $ | 89 | |||||
Obligations for non-consolidated affiliates 2 : |
||||||||
Bank borrowings |
2018 | 167 | ||||||
Residual value guarantees 3 |
2029 | 36 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total guarantees |
$ | 292 | ||||||
|
|
1. |
Existing guarantees for select customers, as part of contractual agreements. The terms of the guarantees are equivalent to the terms of the customer loans that are primarily made to finance customer invoices. Of the total maximum future payments, $85 million had terms less than a year. |
2. |
Existing guarantees for non-consolidated affiliates liquidity needs in normal operations. |
3. |
The company provides guarantees related to leased assets specifying the residual value that will be available to the lessor at lease termination through sale of the assets to the lessee or third parties. |
Litigation
The company is subject to various legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of its current and former business operations, including product liability, intellectual property, commercial, environmental and antitrust lawsuits. It is not possible to predict the outcome of these various proceedings. Although considerable uncertainty exists, management does not anticipate that the ultimate disposition of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the companys results of operations, consolidated financial position or liquidity. However, the ultimate liabilities could be material to results of operations in the period recognized.
PFOA Matters
DuPont used PFOA (collectively, perfluorooctanoic acids and its salts, including the ammonium salt), as a processing aid to manufacture some fluoropolymer resins at various sites around the world including its Washington Works plant in West Virginia. Pursuant to the Separation Agreement discussed in Note 4, the company is indemnified by Chemours for the PFOA matters discussed below and has recorded a total indemnification asset of $16 million.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP)
DuPont is obligated under agreements with the EPA, including a 2009 consent decree to which Chemours was added in 2017, and has made voluntary commitments to the NJDEP. These obligations and voluntary commitments include surveying, sampling and testing drinking water in and around certain company sites and offering treatment or an alternative supply of drinking water if tests indicate the presence of PFOA in drinking water at or greater than the national health advisory level established from time to time by the EPA. At June 30, 2018, the company had an accrual of $16 million related to these obligations and voluntary commitments. The company recorded an indemnification asset corresponding to the accrual balance at June 30, 2018.
Leach v. DuPont
In August 2001, a class action, captioned Leach v. DuPont, was filed in West Virginia state court alleging that residents living near the Washington Works facility had suffered, or may suffer, deleterious health effects from
30
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
exposure to PFOA in drinking water. A settlement was reached in 2004 that binds approximately 80,000 residents, (the Leach Settlement). In addition to paying $23 million to plaintiffs attorneys for fees and expenses and $70 million to fund a community health project, the company is obligated to fund up to $235 million for a medical monitoring program for eligible class members and to pay administrative costs and fees associated with the program. Since the establishment in 2012 of an escrow account to fund medical monitoring as required by the settlement agreement, approximately $2 million has been contributed to the account and approximately $1 million has been disbursed from the account. The company also must continue to provide water treatment designed to reduce the level of PFOA in water to six area water districts, including the Little Hocking Water Association, and private well users. While it is probable that the company will incur liabilities related to funding the medical monitoring program and providing water treatment, the company does not expect any such liabilities to be material.
Under the Leach Settlement, the company funded a series of health studies which were completed in October 2012 by an independent science panel of experts (the C8 Science Panel). The C8 Science Panel found probable links, as defined in the Leach Settlement, between exposure to PFOA and pregnancy-induced hypertension, including preeclampsia; kidney cancer; testicular cancer; thyroid disease; ulcerative colitis; and diagnosed high cholesterol.
Leach class members may pursue personal injury claims against DuPont only for the six human diseases for which the C8 Science Panel determined a probable link exists. Following the Leach Settlement, approximately 3,550 lawsuits alleging personal injury claims were filed in various federal and state courts in Ohio and West Virginia. These lawsuits were consolidated in multi-district litigation (MDL) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.
MDL Settlement
In the first quarter of 2017, the MDL was settled for $670.7 million in cash (the MDL Settlement), half of which was paid by Chemours and half paid by DuPont. The portion paid by DuPont was recorded, for the six months ended June 30, 2017, within loss from discontinued operations after income taxes in the interim Consolidated Income Statements. In 2017, all payments under the settlement agreement were made by both companies. DuPonts payment was not subject to indemnification or reimbursement by Chemours. In exchange for that payment, DuPont and Chemours are receiving releases of all claims by the settling plaintiffs. The MDL Settlement was entered into solely by way of compromise and settlement and is not in any way an admission of liability or fault by DuPont or Chemours. All of the MDL plaintiffs participated and resolved their claims within the MDL Settlement.
Post MDL Settlement PFOA Personal Injury Claims
The MDL Settlement did not resolve claims of plaintiffs who did not have claims in the MDL or whose claims are based on diseases first diagnosed after February 11, 2017. At June 30, 2018, about 35 lawsuits alleging personal injury, including kidney and testicular cancer, from exposure to PFOA in drinking water had been filed against the company in West Virginia and Ohio.
In addition, three lawsuits are pending in federal court in New York on behalf of five individuals who are residents of Hoosick Falls, New York. The plaintiffs claim personal injuries, including kidney cancer, thyroid disease and ulcerative colitis, from alleged exposure to PFOA discharged into the air and water from nearby manufacturing facilities owned and operated by defendant third parties. Plaintiffs claim that PFOA used at the facilities was purchased from or manufactured by the company and co-defendant, 3M Company.
31
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Water Utility and Related Actions
Actions filed by local water utilities pending in Alabama state and New Jersey federal court allege contamination from PFOA, and in the case of the Alabama action, perfluorinated chemicals and compounds, including PFOA, (PFCs) used in co-defendant manufacturers operations. In February 2018, the State of Ohio filed an action in Ohio state court alleging natural resource damages from historical PFOA emissions from the Washington Works site. The plaintiffs in these actions seek monetary damages, remediation and other costs/damages.
While it is reasonably possible that the company could incur liabilities related to the post MDL Settlement PFOA personal injury claims and the water utility and related actions described above, any such liabilities are not expected to be material. Chemours is defending and indemnifying the company in these matters in accordance with the amendment to the Separation Agreement discussed below.
Amendment to Separation Agreement
Concurrent with the MDL Settlement, DuPont and Chemours amended the Separation Agreement to provide for a limited sharing of potential future PFOA liabilities (i.e., indemnifiable losses, as defined in the Separation Agreement) for a period of five years beginning July 6, 2017. During that five -year period, Chemours will annually pay future PFOA liabilities up to $25 million and, if such amount is exceeded, DuPont would pay any excess amount up to the next $25 million (which payment will not be subject to indemnification by Chemours), with Chemours annually bearing any further excess liabilities. After the five -year period, this limited sharing agreement will expire, and Chemours indemnification obligations under the Separation Agreement will continue unchanged. There have been no charges incurred by DuPont under this arrangement through June 30, 2018. Chemours has also agreed that it will not contest its liability to DuPont under the Separation Agreement for PFOA liabilities on the basis of ostensible defenses generally applicable to the indemnification provisions under the Separation Agreement, including defenses relating to punitive damages, fines or penalties or attorneys fees, and waives any such defenses with respect to PFOA liabilities. Chemours has, however, retained defenses as to whether any particular PFOA claim is within the scope of the indemnification provisions of the Separation Agreement.
It is possible that new lawsuits could be filed against DuPont related to PFOA that may not be within the scope of the MDL Settlement. Any such new litigation would be subject to indemnification by Chemours under the Separation Agreement, as amended.
Fayetteville Works Facility, North Carolina
Prior to the separation of Chemours, the company introduced GenX as a polymerization processing aid and a replacement for PFOA at the Fayetteville Works facility. The facility is now owned and operated by Chemours which continues to manufacture and use GenX. Chemours is responding to ongoing inquiries and investigations from federal, state and local investigators, regulators and other governmental authorities as well as inquiries from the media and local community stakeholders. These inquiries and investigations involve the discharge of GenX and certain similar compounds from the Chemours facility at Fayetteville Works into the Cape Fear River in Bladen County, North Carolina.
In August 2017, the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina served the company with a grand jury subpoena for testimony and the production of documents related to alleged discharges of GenX from the Fayetteville Works facility into the Cape Fear River. DuPont has been served with additional subpoenas relating to the same issue and in the second quarter 2018, received a subpoena expanding the scope to any PFCs discharged from the Fayetteville Works facility into the Cape Fear River. It is possible that these ongoing inquiries and investigations, including the grand jury subpoena, could result in penalties or sanctions, or that additional litigation will be instituted against Chemours and/or the company.
32
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
At June 30, 2018, several actions are pending in federal court against Chemours and the company. These actions have been consolidated into a single purported class action, on behalf of putative classes of property owners and residents in areas near or who draw drinking water from the Cape Fear River. These actions relate to the alleged discharge of certain PFCs into the river from the operations and wastewater treatment at the Fayetteville Works facility and seek various relief including medical monitoring, property damages and injunctive relief. Separate actions filed by the various North Carolina water authorities including Cape Fear Public Utility Authority and Brunswick County, North Carolina, have been consolidated into one action for purposes of litigation and seek actual and punitive damages as well as injunctive relief. In addition, an action remains pending in North Carolina state court on behalf of about 100 plaintiffs who own property near the Fayetteville Works facility. The plaintiffs seek damages for nuisance allegedly caused by releases of certain PFCs from the site.
Management believes the probability of loss with respect to these actions is remote.
The company has an indemnification claim against Chemours with respect to current and future inquiries and claims, including lawsuits, related to the foregoing. At June 30, 2018, Chemours is defending and indemnifying the company in the pending civil actions.
Environmental
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. At June 30, 2018, the company had accrued obligations of $426 million for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs, including $60 million for the remediation of Superfund sites. These obligations are included in accrued and other current liabilities and other noncurrent obligations in the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. This is managements best estimate of the costs for remediation and restoration with respect to environmental matters for which the company has accrued liabilities, although it is reasonably possible that the ultimate cost with respect to these particular matters could range up to $860 million above the amount accrued at June 30, 2018. Consequently, it is reasonably possible that environmental remediation and restoration costs in excess of amounts accrued could have a material impact on the companys results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. It is the opinion of the companys management, however, that the possibility is remote that costs in excess of the range disclosed will have a material impact on the companys results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Inherent uncertainties exist in these estimates primarily due to unknown conditions, changing governmental regulations and legal standards regarding liability, and emerging remediation technologies for handling site remediation and restoration.
Pursuant to the Separation Agreement, the company is indemnified by Chemours for certain environmental matters, included in the liability of $426 million, that have an estimated liability of $236 million as of June 30, 2018, and a potential exposure that ranges up to approximately $420 million above the amount accrued. As such, the company has recorded an indemnification asset of $236 million corresponding to the companys accrual balance related to these matters at June 30, 2018, including $41 million related to the Superfund sites.
33
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income
The changes and after-tax balances of components comprising accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income are summarized below:
(In millions) |
Cumulative
Translation Adjustment 1 |
Derivative
Instruments |
Pension
Benefit Plans |
Other
Benefit Plans |
Unrealized
Gain (Loss) on Investments |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||
2017 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2017 ( Predecessor ) |
$ | (2,843 | ) | $ | 7 | $ | (6,720 | ) | $ | (357 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | (9,911 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications |
653 | 2 | (47 | ) | | 1 | 609 | |||||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
| (13 | ) | 244 | 7 | (1 | ) | 237 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) |
653 | (11 | ) | 197 | 7 | | 846 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2017 |
$ | (2,190 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (6,523 | ) | $ | (350 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | (9,065 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
2018 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance January 1, 2018 ( Successor ) |
$ | (454 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 128 | $ | (53 | ) | $ | | $ | (381 | ) | ||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications |
(966 | ) | | 9 | | | (957 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
| (5 | ) | (2 | ) | | | (7 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net other comprehensive (loss) income |
(966 | ) | (5 | ) | 7 | | | (964 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance June 30, 2018 |
$ | (1,420 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 135 | $ | (53 | ) | $ | | $ | (1,345 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
The cumulative translation adjustment gain for the six months ended June 30, 2017 is primarily driven by the weakening of the U.S. dollar (USD) against the European Euro (EUR). The currency translation loss for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily driven by the strengthening of the USD against the EUR and the Brazilian Real (BRL). |
The tax benefit (expense) on the net activity related to each component of other comprehensive (loss) income were as follows:
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Derivative instruments |
$ | 5 | $ | 5 | $ | 1 | $ | 6 | ||||||||
Pension benefit plansnet |
| (54 | ) | (2 | ) | (114 | ) | |||||||||
Other benefit plansnet |
| (2 | ) | | (4 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Provision for income taxes related to other comprehensive income (loss) items |
$ | 5 | $ | (51 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (112 | ) |
34
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
A summary of the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is provided as follows:
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor |
Income
Classification |
||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||||||
Derivative Instruments: |
$ | (6 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (21 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
Tax expense |
2 | 5 | 2 | 8 | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
After-tax |
$ | (4 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (13 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Amortization of pension benefit plans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service benefit |
| (1 | ) | | (2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Actuarial (gain) loss |
(1 | ) | 189 | (1 | ) | 379 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Settlement gain |
(1 | ) | | (1 | ) | | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total before tax |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | 188 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 377 | ||||||||||
Tax benefit |
| (68 | ) | | (133 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
After-tax |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | 120 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 244 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Amortization of other benefit plans: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Prior service benefit |
| (18 | ) | | (35 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||
Actuarial losses |
| 23 | | 46 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total before tax |
$ | | $ | 5 | $ | | $ | 11 | ||||||||||||
Tax benefit |
| (2 | ) | | (4 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
After-tax |
$ | | $ | 3 | $ | | $ | 7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net realized losses on investments, before tax: |
| | | (1 | ) | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||
Tax expense |
| | | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
After-tax |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | (1 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total reclassifications for the period, after-tax |
$ | (6 | ) | $ | 115 | $ | (7 | ) | $ | 237 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Cost of goods sold. |
2. |
Provision for income taxes from continuing operations. |
3. |
These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit (credit) cost of the companys pension and other benefit plans. See Note 16 for additional information. |
4. |
Sundry income (expense)net. |
35
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 16PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POST EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS
The following sets forth the components of the companys net periodic benefit (credit) cost for defined benefit pension plans and other post employment benefits:
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Defined Benefit Pension Plans: |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 33 | $ | 34 | $ | 67 | $ | 67 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
189 | 197 | 379 | 392 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(301 | ) | (309 | ) | (604 | ) | (617 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized (gain) loss |
(1 | ) | 189 | (1 | ) | 379 | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior service benefit |
| (1 | ) | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||
Curtailment/settlement gain 1 |
(4 | ) | | (4 | ) | | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit (credit) costTotal |
$ | (84 | ) | $ | 110 | $ | (163 | ) | $ | 219 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Less: Discontinued operations |
| 1 | | 2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit (credit) costContinuing operations |
$ | (84 | ) | $ | 109 | $ | (163 | ) | $ | 217 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Other Post Employment Benefits: |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | $ | 4 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
22 | 23 | 43 | 45 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized loss |
| 23 | | 46 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service benefit |
| (18 | ) | | (35 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit costContinuing operations |
$ | 24 | $ | 30 | $ | 47 | $ | 60 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
The 2018 impact relates to the curtailment and settlement of pension plans in the U.S. and Australia. |
In accordance with adopted ASU No. 2017-07, service costs are included in cost of goods sold, research and development expense and selling, general and administrative expenses in the interim Consolidated Income Statements. Non-service related components of net periodic benefit (credit) cost are included in sundry income (expense)net in the interim Consolidated Income Statements. See Notes 1, 2 and 8 for additional information.
During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the company made contributions of $2,900 million to its principal U.S. pension plan funded through a debt offering in May of 2017; short-term borrowings, including commercial paper issuance; and cash.
At June 30, 2018, the company had $3,020 million ($5,205 million at December 31, 2017) of held-to-maturity securities (primarily time deposits and money market funds) classified as cash equivalents, as these securities had maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase; and $374 million ($952 million at December 31, 2017) of held-to-maturity securities (primarily time deposits) classified as marketable securities as these securities had maturities of more than three months to less than one year at the time of purchase. The companys investments in held-to-maturity securities are held at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. These securities are included in cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
36
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Derivative Instruments
Objectives and Strategies for Holding Derivative Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the company enters into contractual arrangements (derivatives) to reduce its exposure to foreign currency, interest rate and commodity price risks. The company has established a variety of derivative programs to be utilized for financial risk management. These programs reflect varying levels of exposure coverage and time horizons based on an assessment of risk.
Derivative programs have procedures and controls and are approved by the Corporate Financial Risk Management Committee, consistent with the companys financial risk management policies and guidelines. Derivative instruments used are forwards, options, futures and swaps. The company has not designated any nonderivatives as hedging instruments.
The companys financial risk management procedures also address counterparty credit approval, limits and routine exposure monitoring and reporting. The counterparties to these contractual arrangements are major financial institutions and major commodity exchanges. The company is exposed to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by these counterparties. The company utilizes collateral support annex agreements with certain counterparties to limit its exposure to credit losses. The company anticipates performance by counterparties to these contracts and therefore no material loss is expected. Market and counterparty credit risks associated with these instruments are regularly reported to management.
The notional amounts of the companys derivative instruments were as follows:
Notional Amounts | Successor | |||||||
(In millions) |
June
30,
2018 |
December
31,
2017 |
||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||
Commodity contracts |
$ | 145 | $ | 587 | ||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
3,866 | 3,922 | ||||||
Commodity contracts |
8 | 6 |
Foreign Currency Risk
The companys objective in managing exposure to foreign currency fluctuations is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with foreign currency rate changes. Accordingly, the company enters into various contracts that change in value as foreign exchange rates change to protect the value of its existing foreign currency-denominated assets, liabilities, commitments and cash flows.
The company routinely uses forward exchange contracts to offset its net exposures, by currency, related to the foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations. The primary business objective of this hedging program is to maintain an approximately balanced position in foreign currencies so that exchange gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes, net of related tax effects, are minimized. The company also uses foreign currency exchange contracts to offset a portion of the companys exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated revenues so that gains and losses on these contracts offset changes in the USD value of the related foreign currency-denominated revenues. The objective of the hedge program is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
Commodity Price Risk
Commodity price risk management programs serve to reduce exposure to price fluctuations on purchases of inventory such as corn, soybeans, soybean oil and soybean meal. The company enters into over-the-counter and
37
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
exchange-traded derivative commodity instruments to hedge the commodity price risk associated with agricultural commodity exposures.
Derivatives Designated as Cash Flow Hedges
Commodity Contracts
The company enters into over-the-counter and exchange-traded derivative commodity instruments, including options, futures and swaps, to hedge the commodity price risk associated with agriculture commodity exposures.
While each risk management program has a different time maturity period, most programs currently do not extend beyond the next two -year period. Cash flow hedge results are reclassified into earnings during the same period in which the related exposure impacts earnings. Reclassifications are made sooner if it appears that a forecasted transaction is not probable of occurring.
The following table summarizes the after-tax effect of cash flow hedges on accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 9 | $ | 4 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 7 | |||||||
Additions and revaluations of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges |
(12 | ) | | | 2 | |||||||||||
Clearance of hedge results to earnings |
(4 | ) | (8 | ) | (5 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Ending balance |
$ | (7 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (7 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2018, an after-tax net loss of $5 million is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into earnings over the next twelve months.
Derivatives not Designated in Hedging Relationships
Foreign Currency Contracts
The company routinely uses forward exchange contracts to reduce its net exposure, by currency, related to foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of its operations so that exchange gains and losses resulting from exchange rate changes are minimized. The netting of such exposures precludes the use of hedge accounting; however, the required revaluation of the forward contracts and the associated foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities intends to achieve a minimal earnings impact, after taxes. The company also uses foreign currency exchange contracts to offset a portion of the companys exposure to certain foreign currency-denominated revenues so that gains and losses on the contracts offset changes in the USD value of the related foreign currency-denominated revenues.
Commodity Contracts
The company utilizes options, futures and swaps that are not designated as hedging instruments to reduce exposure to commodity price fluctuations on purchases of inventory such as corn, soybeans, soybean oil and soybean meal.
38
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
Asset and liability derivatives subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement with the same counterparty are presented on a net basis in the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The presentation of the companys derivative assets and liabilities is as follows:
Successor | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2018 | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Balance Sheet Location | Gross |
Counterparty
and Cash Collateral Netting 1 |
Net Amounts
Included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
||||||||||||
Asset derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
Other current assets | $ | 153 | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 118 | ||||||||
Commodity contracts |
Other current assets | 4 | | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total asset derivatives |
|
$ | 157 | $ | (35 | ) | $ | 122 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Liability derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
|
Accrued and other
current liabilities |
|
$ | 35 | $ | 9 | $ | 44 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total liability derivatives |
|
$ | 35 | $ | 9 | $ | 44 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Counterparty and cash collateral amounts represent the estimated net settlement amount when applying netting and set-off rights included in master netting arrangements between the company and its counterparties and the payable or receivable for cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparty. |
Successor | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Balance Sheet Location | Gross |
Counterparty
and Cash Collateral Netting 1 |
Net Amounts
Included in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
||||||||||||
Asset derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
Other current assets | $ | 46 | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 9 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total asset derivatives |
|
$ | 46 | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 9 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Liability derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
|
Accrued and other
current liabilities |
|
$ | 79 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | 47 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total liability derivatives |
|
$ | 79 | $ | (32 | ) | $ | 47 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
Counterparty and cash collateral amounts represent the estimated net settlement amount when applying netting and set-off rights included in master netting arrangements between the company and its counterparties and the payable or receivable for cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparty. |
39
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Effect of Derivative Instruments
Amount of (Loss) Gain Recognized in OCI 1 Pre-Tax | ||||||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts |
$ | (15 | ) | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | 4 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
(15 | ) | | 1 | 4 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | (15 | ) | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | 4 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
OCI is defined as other comprehensive income (loss). |
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in IncomePre-Tax 1 | ||||||||||||||||
Successor | Predecessor | Successor | Predecessor | |||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2017 |
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2017 |
||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash flow hedges: |
||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts 2 |
$ | 6 | $ | 13 | $ | 7 | $ | 21 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
6 | 13 | 7 | 21 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts 3 |
177 | (86 | ) | (4 | ) | (171 | ) | |||||||||
Foreign currency contracts 4 |
| (1 | ) | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
Commodity contracts 2 |
8 | | 5 | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments |
185 | (87 | ) | 1 | (168 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 191 | $ | (74 | ) | $ | 8 | $ | (147 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. |
For cash flow hedges, this represents the portion of the gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income during the period. |
2. |
Recorded in cost of goods sold. |
3. |
Gain recognized in sundry income (expense)net was partially offset by the related gain on the foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities of the companys operations. See Note 8 for additional information. |
4. |
Recorded in net sales. |
40
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
NOTE 18FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following tables summarize the bases used to measure certain assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis:
June 30, 2018 (In millions) |
Significant
Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
|||
Assets at fair value: |
||||
Cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents 1 |
$ | 3,020 | ||
Marketable securities |
374 | |||
Derivatives relating to: 2 |
||||
Commodities |
4 | |||
Foreign currency |
153 | |||
|
|
|||
Total assets at fair value |
$ | 3,551 | ||
|
|
|||
Liabilities at fair value: |
||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 11,186 | ||
Derivatives relating to: 2 |
||||
Foreign currency |
35 | |||
|
|
|||
Total liabilities at fair value |
$ | 11,221 | ||
|
|
1. |
Time deposits included in cash and cash equivalents and money market funds included in other current assets in the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are held at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. |
2. |
See Note 17 for the classification of derivatives in the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
December 31, 2017 (In millions) |
Significant
Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
|||
Assets at fair value: |
||||
Cash equivalents and restricted cash equivalents 1 |
$ | 5,205 | ||
Marketable securities |
952 | |||
Derivatives relating to: 2 |
||||
Foreign currency |
46 | |||
|
|
|||
Total assets at fair value |
$ | 6,203 | ||
|
|
|||
Liabilities at fair value: |
||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 11,560 | ||
Derivatives relating to: 2 |
||||
Foreign currency |
79 | |||
|
|
|||
Total liabilities at fair value |
$ | 11,639 | ||
|
|
1. |
Time deposits included in cash and cash equivalents and money market funds included in other current assets in the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets are held at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. |
2. |
See Note 17 for the classification of derivatives in the interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
41
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP 3320 Ridgecrest Drive Suite 400 Midland, MI 48642-5859 USA
Tel: +1 989 631 2370 Fax: +1 989 631 4485 www.deloitte.com |
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
To Management of the Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
We have audited the accompanying combined financial statements of the Dow Agricultural Sciences Business (the Business), a business of The Dow Chemical Company (Dow) as described in Note 1 to the combined financial statements, which comprise the combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, and the related combined statements of income and comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related notes to the combined financial statements.
Managements Responsibility for the Combined Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these combined financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of combined financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these combined financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the combined financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditors judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the combined financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Business preparation and fair presentation of the combined financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Business internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the combined financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Opinion
In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Dow Agricultural Sciences Business as of December 31, 2017, and the results of Business operations and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
2
Emphasis of Matter
We draw attention to Note 2 which describes the basis of presentation. The combined financial statements include allocations of certain expenses from Dow. As a result, the allocations may not reflect the expense the Business would have incurred as a stand-alone company. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Midland, Michigan
October 17, 2018
3
The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
Combined Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(In millions) For the years ended December 31 |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 6,004 | $ | 6,165 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cost of sales |
3,995 | 4,020 | ||||||
Research and development expenses |
581 | 586 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
836 | 845 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
18 | 18 | ||||||
Restructuring and asset related charges net |
181 | 11 | ||||||
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates |
3 | 4 | ||||||
Sundry income (expenses) net |
241 | (20 | ) | |||||
Interest expense |
61 | 30 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income before income taxes |
576 | 639 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Provision (credit) for income taxes |
460 | (48 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net Income |
116 | 687 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
24 | 14 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income attributable to the Business |
92 | 673 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax |
||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
69 | (159 | ) | |||||
Pension and other postretirement benefit plan |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
65 | (163 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income |
181 | 524 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
24 | 14 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income attributable to the Business |
$ | 157 | $ | 510 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
4
The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
(In millions) At December 31 |
2017 | |||
Assets | ||||
Current Assets |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 106 | ||
Accounts and notes receivable: |
||||
Trade (net of allowance for doubtful receivables 2017: $56) |
1,345 | |||
Other |
498 | |||
Inventories |
1,897 | |||
Other current assets |
116 | |||
|
|
|||
Total current assets |
3,962 | |||
|
|
|||
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates |
51 | |||
|
|
|||
Property |
||||
Property |
3,724 | |||
Less accumulated depreciation |
2,324 | |||
|
|
|||
Net property |
1,400 | |||
|
|
|||
Other Assets |
||||
Goodwill |
1,344 | |||
Other intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization 2017: $334) |
197 | |||
Noncurrent receivables |
48 | |||
Deferred income tax assets |
151 | |||
Deferred charges and other assets |
54 | |||
|
|
|||
Total other assets |
1,794 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Assets |
$ | 7,207 | ||
|
|
|||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||
Current Liabilities |
||||
Notes payable |
$ | 2 | ||
Long-term debt due within one year |
6 | |||
Accounts payable: |
||||
Trade |
616 | |||
Other |
570 | |||
Income taxes payable |
144 | |||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
661 | |||
|
|
|||
Total current liabilities |
1,999 | |||
|
|
|||
Long-Term Debt (variable interest entities nonrecourse 2017: $15) |
23 | |||
|
|
|||
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
219 | |||
Pension and other postretirement benefits |
136 | |||
Other noncurrent obligations |
169 | |||
|
|
|||
Total other noncurrent liabilities |
524 | |||
|
|
|||
Combined Equity |
||||
Net parent investment |
5,417 | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(797 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total Business equity |
4,620 | |||
|
|
|||
Noncontrolling interests |
41 | |||
|
|
|||
Total combined equity |
4,661 | |||
|
|
|||
Total Liabilities and Combined Equity |
$ | 7,207 | ||
|
|
See Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
5
The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
Combined Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions) For the years ended December 31 |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 116 | $ | 687 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
206 | 184 | ||||||
Provision (Credit) for deferred income tax |
161 | (265 | ) | |||||
Earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates less than (in excess of) dividends received |
(1 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Net gain on sales of investments |
| (1 | ) | |||||
Net gain on sales of property, businesses and consolidated companies |
(676 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Net (gain) loss on sales of ownership interests in nonconsolidated affiliates |
3 | (1 | ) | |||||
Restructuring and asset related charges net |
181 | 11 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
(365 | ) | (132 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
(237 | ) | 133 | |||||
Trade accounts payable |
75 | 13 | ||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
34 | (211 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(503 | ) | 410 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investing Activities |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(142 | ) | (179 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property, businesses and consolidated companies, net of cash divested |
1,086 | 27 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of ownership interest in nonconsolidated affiliates |
30 | | ||||||
Other investing activities, net |
(100 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
874 | (152 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Financing Activities |
||||||||
Net transfers to parent |
(567 | ) | (18 | ) | ||||
Changes in short-term notes payable |
(2 | ) | | |||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
| 2 | ||||||
Contingent payment for acquisition of businesses |
(31 | ) | (24 | ) | ||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(19 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash used in financing activities |
(623 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Summary |
||||||||
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(252 | ) | 202 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
358 | 156 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
$ | 106 | $ | 358 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental cash flow information |
||||||||
Cash paid during the year for: |
||||||||
Interest, net of amounts capitalized |
$ | 61 | $ | 30 | ||||
Income taxes |
$ | 314 | $ | 157 |
See Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
6
The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
(In millions) For the years ended December 31 |
Net Parent
Investment |
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss |
Noncontrolling
Interests |
Total
Combined Equity |
||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 |
$ | 5,237 | $ | (699 | ) | $ | 34 | $ | 4,572 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net Income |
673 | | 14 | 687 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) |
| (163 | ) | | (163 | ) | ||||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest and other |
| | (10 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Net transfers to parent |
(18 | ) | | | (18 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
$ | 5,892 | $ | (862 | ) | $ | 38 | $ | 5,068 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net Income |
92 | | 24 | 116 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| 65 | | 65 | ||||||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest and other |
| | (21 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||||||||
Net transfers to parent |
(567 | ) | | | (567 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
$ | 5,417 | $ | (797 | ) | $ | 41 | $ | 4,661 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
7
The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
NOTE 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
The accompanying combined financial statements present the combined assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses related to the Agricultural Sciences Business (the Business) of The Dow Chemical Company (Dow or the Company). The Business leverages the Companys technology, customer relationships and industry knowledge to improve the quantity, quality and safety of the global food supply and the global production agriculture industry. Land available for worldwide agricultural production is increasingly limited so production growth will need to be achieved principally through improving crop yields and productivity. The business serves the global production agriculture industry with crop protection products for weed control, disease control and insect control offerings for foliar or soil application or as a seed treatment. It is also a global leader in providing seed/plant biotechnology products and technologies to improve the productivity and profitability of its customers.
NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The combined financial statements present the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows of the Business and have been derived from the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of Dow using the historical results of operations and historical basis of assets and liabilities of the Business. The combined financial statements of the Business have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and accounted for as a private company. Investments in nonconsolidated affiliates (20-50 percent owned companies, joint ventures and partnerships) are accounted for using the equity method.
The combined statements of income and comprehensive income include allocations of certain expenses for services from Dow, including, but not limited to, general corporate expenses related to finance, legal, information technology, human resources, ethics and compliance, shared services, employee benefits and incentives, insurance and stock-based compensation. These expenses have been allocated on the basis of direct usage when identifiable, with the remainder allocated on the basis of headcount or other measures. The Business considers the basis on which the expenses have been allocated to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided. The allocations may not, however, reflect the expense the Business would have incurred as a stand-alone company. The amount of actual costs that may have been incurred if the Business was a stand-alone company would depend on a number of factors, including the Businesss chosen organizational structure, what functions were outsourced or performed by the Business employees, and strategic decisions made in areas such as information technology and infrastructure.
All debt and debt-related interest cost incurred by the Business has been recorded in the combined financial statements.
As a direct ownership relationship did not exist among the various operations comprising the Business, a Net parent investment account is shown in lieu of stockholders equity in the combined financial statements. All significant transactions between Dow and the Business have been included in the combined financial statements and were settled for cash through Dows centralized cash management system. The total net effect of the settlement of these related party transactions is reflected in the combined statements of cash flows as a financing activity and net parent investment in the combined balance sheet.
Use of Estimates in Financial Statement Preparation
Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of these combined financial statements include, but are not limited to, accounting for revenue and cost recognition, allocation of expenses related to certain corporate
8
functions, evaluation of goodwill and other assets for impairment, income taxes including deferred taxes, fair value measurements, customer incentive program liabilities, legal and environmental liabilities and other contingencies.
Foreign Currency Translation
For entities where the U.S. dollar (USD) is the functional currency, all foreign currency-denominated asset and liability amounts are remeasured into USD at year end exchange rates, except for inventories, prepaid expenses, property and accumulated depreciation, goodwill and other intangible assets, which are remeasured at historical rates. Foreign currency-denominated income and expenses are remeasured at average exchange rates in effect during the year, except for expenses related to balance sheet amounts remeasured at historical exchange rates. Exchange gains and losses arising from remeasurement of foreign currency-denominated monetary assets and liabilities, were allocated on a proportional basis using net sales from the corresponding Dow legal entities and included in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income in Sundry income (expenses).
For entities where the local currency is the functional currency, assets and liabilities denominated in local currencies are translated into USD at year end exchange rates and income statements amounts are translated at average exchange rates in effect during the year. Translation gains and losses of those operations that use the local currency as the functional currency, were allocated on a proportional basis using net property and other intangible assets from the corresponding Dow legal entities and included in the combined balance sheet in Accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL).
Environmental Matters
Accruals for environmental matters specifically attributable to the Business are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. These accruals are adjusted periodically as assessment and remediation efforts progress or as additional technical or legal information becomes available. Accruals for environmental liabilities are included in the combined balance sheet in Accrued and other current liabilities and Other noncurrent obligations at undiscounted amounts. Accruals for related insurance or other third-party recoveries for environmental liabilities are recorded when it is probable that a recovery will be realized and are included in the combined balance sheet as Accounts and notes receivable Other.
Environmental costs are capitalized if the costs extend the life of the property, increase its capacity, and/or mitigate or prevent contamination from future operations. Environmental costs are also capitalized in recognition of legal asset retirement obligations resulting from the acquisition, construction and/or normal operation of a long-lived asset. Costs related to environmental contamination treatment and cleanup are charged to expense. Estimated future incremental operations, maintenance and management costs directly related to remediation are accrued when such costs are probable and reasonably estimable.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Dow uses a centralized approach for managing cash and financing operations with its subsidiaries. Accordingly, a substantial portion of the Businesss bank cash balances are transferred to Dows cash management accounts regularly by Dow at its discretion and therefore are not included in the combined financial statements. Only cash balances legally owned by the Business are reflected in the combined balance sheet. Transfers of cash between the Business and Dow are included within Net transfers to parent in the combined statements of cash flows and the combined statements of equity.
Fair Value
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable are representative of their respective fair values due to the short-term maturity of these instruments.
9
The fair value hierarchy for valuation gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
|
Level 1 Inputs Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments that the reporting entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date. |
|
Level 2 Inputs Inputs that are observable for the instrument, either directly or indirectly, other than quoted prices included in Level 1. These inputs might include quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the investment (such as interest rates, volatilities, prepayment speeds, credit risks) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by correlation or other means. |
|
Level 3 Inputs Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of instruments that reflect assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the instruments. |
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value for inventory measured under the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or average cost method. An inventory reserve would permanently reduce the cost basis of inventory. Inventories are valued as follows:
Crop Protection: Actual cost is used to value raw materials and supplies. Standard cost, which approximates actual cost, is used to value finished goods and work in process. Variances, exclusive of abnormally low volume and operating performance, are capitalized into inventory. Standard cost includes direct labor, raw materials and manufacturing overhead based on normal capacity. The cost of inventories is determined by using the FIFO method.
Seed: Actual cost is used to value raw materials such as treatment chemicals and packaging, as well as work in process. Costs for substantially all finished goods, which include the cost of carryover crops from the previous year, are valued at weighted-average actual cost. Weighted-average actual cost includes field growing and harvesting costs, plant conditioning and packaging costs and manufacturing overhead costs.
The Business establishes allowances for obsolescence of inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory (if higher) and the estimated net realizable value, based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. The Business regularly evaluates the adequacy of its inventory obsolescence reserves. If economic and market conditions are different from those anticipated, inventory obsolescence could be materially different from the amounts provided for in the Business combined financial statements. If inventory obsolescence is higher than expected, cost of sales will be increased, and inventory and net income will be reduced.
Property
Land, buildings and equipment, including property under capital lease agreements, are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is based on the estimated service lives of depreciable assets and is calculated using the straight-line method. Fully depreciated assets are retained in property and accumulated depreciation accounts until they are removed from service. In the case of disposals, assets and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and the net amounts, less proceeds from disposal, are included in income.
Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. When
10
undiscounted future cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover an assets carrying amount, the asset is written down to its fair value based on bids received from third parties or a discounted cash flow analysis based on market participant assumptions.
Long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale, if material, are classified as held for sale and reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell, and depreciation is ceased. Long-lived assets to be disposed of other than by sale are classified as held and used until they are disposed of and reported at the lower of carrying amount or fair value, and depreciation is recognized over the remaining useful life of the assets.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill is recorded when the purchase price of a business combination exceeds the estimated fair value of net identified tangible and intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level annually, or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit has more likely than not declined below its carrying value. When testing goodwill for impairment, the Business may first assess qualitative factors. If an initial qualitative assessment identifies that it is more likely than not that the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, additional quantitative testing is performed. The Business may also elect to skip the qualitative testing and proceed directly to quantitative testing. If the quantitative testing indicates that goodwill is impaired, the carrying value of goodwill is written down to fair value. A discounted cash flow methodology is primarily utilized to calculate fair value.
Finite-lived intangible assets consist primarily of purchased customer lists, developed technology, patents, trademarks and software.
Acquired licenses and intellectual property include intangible assets related to acquisitions and licenses through which the Business has acquired the rights to various research and discovery technologies. These encompass intangible assets such as enabling processes and data libraries necessary to support the integrated genomics and biotechnology platforms.
Acquired trademarks, registrations and germplasm include a broad portfolio of trademarks and registrations for various crop protection products, traits and agricultural seeds. Completed technology germplasm consists of seed hybrids and varieties that are commercially available. Core technology germplasm is the collective germplasm of parental seeds and has a longer useful life as it is used to develop new seed hybrids and varieties. Acquired commercial brands and customer lists are also examples of finite-lived intangible assets.
Trade Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
Trade accounts payable and accrued liabilities directly related to the Business were included in the combined financial statements. Any remaining amount that is processed and handled by Dows centralized cash disbursement process were allocated to the Business based on the Business proportion of certain expenses to the corresponding total amount of certain expenses for Dow.
Sales
The Business derives most of its revenue from three main sources: sales of crop protection related products; sales of branded conventional seed and branded seed with biotechnology traits; and royalties and license revenues from licensed biotechnology traits and genetic material.
Revenues from crop protection products are recognized when title to the products is transferred. The Business recognizes revenue on products it sells to distributors when, according to the terms of the sales agreements, delivery has occurred, performance is complete, no right of return exists unless required by law, and pricing is fixed or determinable.
11
Revenues from seed products are recognized when risks and rewards of ownership of the products are transferred. The Business recognizes revenue on products it sells to distributors when, according to the terms of the sales agreement, delivery has occurred, performance is complete, expected returns can be reasonably estimated, and pricing is fixed or determinable. When the right of return exists in the seed business, revenues are reduced at the time of sale to reflect expected returns. In order to estimate the expected returns, management analyzes historical returns, economic trends, market conditions and changes in customer demand.
Promotional, Advertising and Customer Incentive Program Costs
Promotional and advertising costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income. Advertising and promotional costs were $129 million and $124 million in 2017 and 2016 respectively. Customer incentive program costs are recorded based on specific performance criteria met by Business customers, such as purchase volumes, promptness of payment and market share increases. The cost of customer incentive programs is generally recorded in Net Sales in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income. The fair value of incentive programs earned by customers for services with separate identifiable benefit is generally recorded in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income. As actual customer incentive program expenses are not known at the time of the sale, an estimate based on the best available information (such as historical experience and market research) is used as a basis for recording customer incentive program liabilities. Management analyzes and reviews the customer incentive program balances on a quarterly basis, and adjustments are recorded as appropriate.
Under certain customer incentive programs, product performance and variations in weather can result in free product to customers. The associated cost of this free product is recognized as a reduction to Net Sales in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
Cost Allocation Methodology
The Business consumes products and services that are provided by Dow. These include materials, utilities, shared manufacturing services and shared administrative services, among others. These products and services are charged to the Business using Dows fundamental cost allocation methodology which affects the valuation of inventory, cost of sales, research and development expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses of the Business.
The methodology for costing products and services focuses on the activities performed to produce the products or services. Costs are assigned to activities and then to products or services based on the consumption of activities by each product or service. Each activity is measured and costed per a base unit such as hours or quantity (a cost driver). To determine the cost of an activity, all of the resources used to produce the activity are determined. After confirming the expected demand for the product or service, the cost per unit of activity is determined by dividing the total cost by the total expected demand for the cost driver.
Cost of Sales
The Business classifies the costs of manufacturing and distributing its products as cost of sales. Manufacturing costs include raw materials, utilities, packaging, fixed manufacturing costs, fees paid to third party contracted applicators, and fees paid to third party contract manufacturers associated with production. Fixed manufacturing costs include such items as plant site operating costs and overhead, production planning, depreciation and amortization, repairs and maintenance, environmental, and engineering costs and allocations to the Business using Dows cost allocation methodology. Freight costs and any directly related costs of transporting finished product to customers are included in Cost of sales in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
12
Research and Development
Research and development (R&D) expenses are the cost of services performed by the R&D function, including technical service and development, process research, and product development in support of the Business. The expenses incurred by the R&D function in support of the Business include costs recorded within business direct cost centers and allocations to the Business using Dows cost allocation methodology. The direct costs include costs incurred with third party contractors and the expenses of the R&D individuals assigned to the Business, including salaries, fringe benefits, travel, materials and supplies, information technology and office expenses.
Selling, General and Administrative
Selling, general and administrative expenses are the cost of services performed by the marketing and sales functions (including sales managers, field sellers, marketing research, marketing communications and promotion and advertising materials) and by administrative functions (including product management, business management, customer invoicing and human resources) in support of the Business. The expenses include costs recorded within business direct cost centers and allocations to the Business using Dows cost allocation methodology. The direct costs include the expenses of the marketing and sales individuals assigned to the Business, including salaries, fringe benefits, travel, materials and supplies, information technology and office expenses.
Legal Costs
Legal costs are expensed as incurred. The expenses include costs recorded on business direct cost centers and allocations to the Business using Dows cost allocation methodology. The direct costs represent legal costs specifically related to the Business. The impact of legal costs is included in Cost of Sales, Research and development expenses and Selling, general and administrative expenses in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
Severance Costs
Management routinely reviews its operations around the world in an effort to ensure competitiveness across its businesses and geographic regions. When the reviews result in a workforce reduction related to the shutdown of facilities or other optimization activities, severance benefits are provided to employees primarily under Dows ongoing benefit arrangements. These severance costs are accrued once management commits to a plan of termination and it becomes probable that employees will be entitled to benefits at amounts that can be reasonably estimated. The impact of severance charges is shown as Restructuring and asset related charges net in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
Income Taxes
During the periods presented, the Businesss operations are included in the consolidated U.S. federal, certain state and local and foreign income tax returns filed by DowDuPont, where applicable. The Business also files certain separate state and local and foreign income tax returns. The income tax provision (benefit) included in these Combined Financial Statements has been calculated using the separate return basis, as if the Business entities filed separate tax returns. It is possible that the Business will make different tax accounting elections and assertions subsequent to separation. Therefore, the Businesss income taxes, as presented in the Combined Financial Statements, may not be indicative of the income taxes that the Business will generate in the future. In jurisdictions where the Business has been included in tax returns filed by DowDuPont, any income taxes payable resulting from the related income tax provisions have been reflected in the balance sheet within Net Parent Investment.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, applying enacted tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the
13
differences are expected to reverse. Based on the evaluation of available evidence, both positive and negative, the Business recognizes future tax benefits, such as net operating loss carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards, to the extent that realizing these benefits is considered to be more likely than not. Deferred taxes are not provided on the unremitted earnings of subsidiaries outside of the United States when it is expected that these earnings will be permanently reinvested.
At December 31, 2017, the Business had a net deferred tax liability balance of $68 million, after valuation allowances of $522 million.
In evaluating the ability to realize the deferred tax assets, the Business relies on, in order of increasing subjectivity, taxable income in prior carryback years, the future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, tax planning strategies and forecasted taxable income using historical and projected future operating results.
At December 31, 2017 , the Business had deferred tax assets for tax loss and tax credit carryforwards of $531 million, $36 million of which is subject to expiration in the years 2018 through 2022.
Annual tax provisions include amounts considered sufficient to pay assessments that may result from examinations of prior year tax returns; however, the amount ultimately paid upon resolution of issues raised may differ from the amounts accrued. The Business recognizes the financial statement effects of an uncertain income tax position when it is more likely than not, based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. At December 31, 2017, the Business had recorded unrecognized tax benefits related to foreign issues of $0.2 million.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (The Act) was enacted, making significant changes to the U.S. tax law (see Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information). The SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118), which provides guidance on accounting for the tax effects of The Act for which the accounting under ASC 740, Income Taxes (ASC 740) is incomplete. To the extent that a businesss accounting for certain income tax effects of The Act is incomplete, but it is able to determine a reasonable estimate, it must record a provisional estimate in the financial statements. The provisional amounts, and adjustments identified in the measurement period, are recorded to the provision for income taxes in the period the amounts are determined. In accordance with SAB 118, income tax effects of The Act may be refined upon obtaining, preparing, or analyzing additional information during the measurement period and such changes could be material. SAB 118 provides that the measurement period is complete when a businesss accounting is complete and in no circumstances should the measurement period extend beyond one year from the enactment date. If a business cannot determine a provisional estimate to be included in the financial statements, it should continue to apply ASC 740 on the basis of the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately prior to enactment of The Act.
NOTE 3 RECENT ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
In the first quarter of 2017, the Business adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-09, Compensation Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment awards to employees, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, statutory tax withholding requirements and classification in the statement of cash flows. The new standard was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2016. Under the new guidance, excess tax benefits related to equity compensation are now recognized in Provision (credit) for income taxes in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income rather than in Additional paid-in capital in the combined balance sheet and this change was applied on a prospective basis. Changes to the combined statements of cash flows related to the classification of excess tax benefits and employee taxes paid for share-based payment arrangements were implemented on a retrospective basis.
14
In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Business early adopted ASU 2017-04, Intangibles Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to determine the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit to measure goodwill impairment. Under the amendments in the new guidance, goodwill impairment testing is performed by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognizing an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting units fair value. The new standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and should be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption was permitted for annual or interim goodwill impairment testing performed after January 1, 2017. The Business adopted the new guidance for goodwill impairment tests performed in the fourth quarter of 2017.
Accounting Guidance Issued But Not Adopted at December 31, 2017
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is the new comprehensive revenue recognition standard that will supersede all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The standards core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Business expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The effective date for this ASU is annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017. Entities will have the option of using either a full retrospective approach or a modified approach to adopt the guidance in ASU 2014-09. In 2015 and 2016, the FASB issued additional ASUs related to Topic 606 that delayed the effective date and clarified various aspects of the new revenue guidance, including principal versus agent considerations, identification of performance obligations, and accounting for licenses, and included other improvements and practical expedients.
The Business analyzed the impact of ASU 2014-09, and the related ASUs, across all revenue streams to evaluate the impact of the new standard on revenue contracts. This included reviewing current accounting policies and practices to identify potential differences that would result from applying the requirements under the new standard. The Business completed contract reviews and validated the results of applying the new revenue guidance. The Business finalized its accounting policies, the evaluation of the impact of the accounting and disclosure requirements on its business processes, controls and systems, and is drafting new disclosures required post-implementation in 2018. The Business will adopt the new standard using the modified retrospective approach, under which the cumulative effect of initially applying the new guidance will be recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of net parent investment in the first quarter of 2018. Based on the completed analysis, the Business has determined the adjustment will not have a material impact on the combined financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The new guidance requires that a lessee recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than twelve months and recognition, presentation and measurement in the financial statements will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. In addition, the new guidance will require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. Lessor accounting remains largely unchanged from current U.S. GAAP but does contain some targeted improvements to align with the new revenue recognition guidance issued in 2014. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, using a modified retrospective approach, and early adoption is permitted. The Business has a team in place to evaluate the new guidance and is in the process of implementing a software solution to facilitate the development of business processes and controls around leases to meet the new accounting and disclosure requirements upon adoption in the first quarter of 2019.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses the diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and
15
cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows with respect to eight specific cash flow issues. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented, if practicable. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period, and any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes the interim period. All amendments must be adopted in the same period.
In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to net parent investment at the beginning period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted in the first interim period of an annual reporting period for which financial statements have not been issued. The Business will adopt the new guidance in the first quarter of 2018 and the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the combined financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which amends the requirements related to the income statement presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for employer sponsored defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Under the new guidance, an entity must disaggregate and present the service cost component of the net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line item(s) as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period, and only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization. Other components of net periodic benefit cost will be presented separately from the line item(s) that includes the service cost. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted at the beginning of an annual period in which the financial statements have not been issued. Entities must use a retrospective transition method to adopt the requirement for separate presentation of the income statement service cost and other components, and a prospective transition method to adopt the requirement to limit the capitalization of benefit cost to the service cost component. The Business will adopt the new guidance in the first quarter of 2018, using a retrospective transition method to reclassify net periodic benefit cost, other than the service cost component, from Cost of sales, Research and development expenses and Selling, general and administrative expenses to Sundry income (expense) net in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation defined under ASC 815, with the objectives of improving the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entitys risk management activities and simplifying the application of hedge accounting by preparers. The new standard expands the strategies eligible for hedge accounting, relaxes the timing requirements of hedge documentation and effectiveness assessments, and permits, in certain cases, the use of qualitative assessments on an ongoing basis to assess hedge effectiveness. The new guidance also requires new disclosures and presentation. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period after issuance of the ASU. Entities must adopt the new guidance by applying a modified retrospective approach to hedging relationships existing as of the adoption date. The Business will early adopt the new guidance in the second quarter of 2018 and there will not be a material impact on the combined financial statements.
In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to net parent investment for stranded tax effects resulting from Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (The Act), which was enacted on December 22, 2017, and requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. An entity has the option of applying the new guidance
16
at the beginning of the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the tax effects related to items remaining in accumulated other comprehensive income are recognized. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period for reporting periods in which the financial statements have not yet been issued. The Business will early adopt the new guidance in the second quarter of 2018.
NOTE 4 RESTRUCTURING AND ASSET RELATED CHARGES
DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program
In September and November 2017, DowDuPont Inc. (DowDuPont) approved post-merger restructuring actions under the DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program (the Synergy Program), which is designed to integrate and optimize the organization following the merger between Dow and DuPont and in preparation for the intended separation of DowDuPonts agriculture business.
As a result of these actions, the Business recorded pretax restructuring charges of $181 million, consisting of severance and related benefit costs of $47 million, asset write-downs and write-offs of $94 million and costs associated with exit and disposal activities of $40 million. The impact of these charges is shown as Restructuring and asset related charges net in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
Synergy Program In millions |
Severance
and Related Benefit Costs |
Assets
Write- downs and Write-offs |
Cost Associated
with Exit and Disposal Activities |
Total | ||||||||||||
2017 Restructuring Charges |
$ | 47 | $ | 94 | $ | 40 | $ | 181 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Charges against the reserve |
| (94 | ) | | (94 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash payments |
(13 | ) | | | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Reserve balance at December 31, 2017 |
$ | 34 | $ | | $ | 40 | $ | 74 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 Restructuring
On June 27, 2016, Dows Board approved a restructuring plan. As a result of these actions, the Business recorded pretax restructuring charges of $6 million. The impact of these charges are included in Restructuring and asset related charges net in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
NOTE 5 DIVESTITURES
Divestiture of a Portion of Dow AgroSciences Brazil Corn Seed Business
On July 11, 2017, as a condition of regulatory approval of the merger between Dow and DuPont, Dow announced it had entered into a definitive agreement with CITIC Agri Fund to sell a portion of Dow AgroSciences Brazil corn seed business (the DAS Divested Ag Business), including four corn seed production sites and four research centers, a copy of Dow AgroSciences Brazilian corn germplasm bank, certain commercial and pipeline hybrids, the MORGAN trademark and a license to the DOW SEMENTES trademark for 12 months. On November 30, 2017, the sale was completed for $1,129 million, net of working capital adjustments, costs to sell and other adjustments, with proceeds subject to customary post-closing adjustments.
17
In 2017, the Business recognized a pretax gain of $671 million on the sale, included in Sundry income (expense) net in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
DAS Divested Ag Business Assets and Liabilities Divested on
In millions |
||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 22 | ||
Accounts and notes receivable trade and other |
59 | |||
Inventories |
139 | |||
Net property |
70 | |||
Goodwill |
128 | |||
Noncurrent receivables, deferred charges and other assets |
102 | |||
|
|
|||
Total assets divested |
$ | 520 | ||
|
|
|||
Current liabilities |
$ | 39 | ||
Long-Term Debt and other noncurrent liabilities |
23 | |||
|
|
|||
Total liabilities divested |
$ | 62 | ||
|
|
|||
Net carrying value divested |
$ | 458 | ||
|
|
NOTE 6 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The Businesss trade accounts receivable for the periods presented were subject to inclusion in Dows various trade accounts receivable securitization programs whereby trade accounts receivable of select entities were sold on a revolving basis to certain multi-seller commercial paper conduit entities. The loss on the sale of receivables is recorded as interest expense by Dow; none of this loss is allocated to the Business. In 2017, Dow held a beneficial interest in certain conduits that were recorded as an asset on Dows balance sheet. This asset is considered part of Dows centralized cash and debt management activities, and as such, no portion of the asset has been allocated to the Business. Trade accounts receivable derecognized from the combined balance sheet of the Business were $275 million at December 31, 2017.
The provision for doubtful receivables, included in Selling, general and administrative expenses in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income, was a credit of $1 million in 2017 and a provision of $17 million in 2016.
NOTE 7 INVENTORIES
The following table provides a breakdown of inventories:
Inventories at December 31 In millions |
2017 | |||
Finished goods |
$ | 951 | ||
Work in process |
731 | |||
Raw materials |
164 | |||
Supplies |
51 | |||
|
|
|||
Total inventories |
$ | 1,897 | ||
|
|
18
NOTE 8 PROPERTY
Property at December 31 In millions |
Estimated
Useful Lives (Years) |
2017 | ||||||
Land and land improvement |
0-25 | $ | 205 | |||||
Buildings |
5-50 | 590 | ||||||
Machinery and equipment |
3-25 | 2,591 | ||||||
Other property |
3-50 | 194 | ||||||
Construction in progress |
| 144 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total property |
$ | 3,724 | ||||||
|
|
In millions |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Depreciation expense |
$ | 182 | $ | 161 | ||||
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9 NONCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
The Businesss investments in companies accounted for using the equity method (nonconsolidated affiliates) was $51 million at December 31, 2017, classified as Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates in the combined balance sheet.
The Business has service agreements with some of these entities, including contracts to manage the operations of manufacturing sites and the construction of new facilities; licensing and technology agreements; and marketing, sales, purchase, lease and sublease agreements.
Sales to and purchases from nonconsolidated affiliates, and balances due to nonconsolidated affiliates were not significant to the combined financial statements. Balance due from nonconsolidated affiliates was $69 million at December 31, 2017, and were included in Accounts and notes receivable Other in the combined balance sheet.
Principal Nonconsolidated Affiliates
The Business had an ownership interest in 11 nonconsolidated affiliates at December 31, 2017. The Businesss ownership interest (direct and indirect) in each principal nonconsolidated affiliate at December 31, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
Ownership Interest | ||||||||
Principal Nonconsolidated Affiliates at December 31 |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
ChacoDAS S.A. |
50.0 | % | 50.0 | % | ||||
Barenbrug Holding B.V. |
25.7 | % | 25.7 | % | ||||
Illinois Foundation Seeds, Inc. |
| % | 45.3 | % |
19
The Businesss investment in its principal nonconsolidated affiliates was $40 million at December 31, 2017. Equity earnings from these companies were $3 million in 2017 and $2 million in 2016. The summarized financial information that follows represents the combined accounts (at 100 percent) of the principal nonconsolidated affiliates.
Summarized Income Statement Information In millions |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Sales |
$ | 209 | $ | 304 | ||||
Gross profit |
$ | 76 | $ | 111 | ||||
Net income |
$ | 7 | $ | 19 |
NOTE 10 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table shows changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2017:
Goodwill In millions |
Total | |||
Balance at January 1, 2017 |
$ | 1,472 | ||
Divestiture of the DAS Divested Ag Business |
(128 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
$ | 1,344 | ||
|
|
Goodwill Impairment Testing
The Business performs an impairment test of goodwill annually in the fourth quarter. In the fourth quarter of 2017, the Business early adopted ASU 2017-04. See Note 3 for additional information.
In 2017, Dow performed a qualitative assessment for the Business. The qualitative test indicated that it was not more likely than not that fair value was less than the carrying value for the Business. Impairment tests conducted in 2016 concluded that no goodwill impairments existed.
20
Other Intangible Assets
The following table provides information regarding the Businesss other intangible assets:
2017 | ||||||||||||
Other Intangible Assets at December 31 In millions |
Gross
Carrying Amount |
Accum
Amount |
Net | |||||||||
Intangible assets with finite lives: |
||||||||||||
Developed technology |
$ | 109 | $ | (100 | ) | $ | 9 | |||||
Software |
42 | (30 | ) | 12 | ||||||||
Trademarks |
114 | (72 | ) | 42 | ||||||||
Customer-related |
18 | (18 | ) | | ||||||||
Licensing Agreement |
60 | (3 | ) | 57 | ||||||||
Other |
141 | (111 | ) | 30 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total other intangible assets, finite lives |
$ | 484 | $ | (334 | ) | $ | 150 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
IPR&D |
47 | | 47 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total other intangible assets |
$ | 531 | $ | (334 | ) | $ | 197 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table provides information regarding amortization expense related to intangible assets:
Amortization Expense In millions |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, excluding software |
$ | 18 | $ | 18 | ||||
Software, included in Cost of sales |
$ | 2 | $ | 2 |
Total estimated amortization expense for the next five fiscal years is as follows:
Estimated Amortization Expense for Next Five Years In millions |
||||
2018 |
$ | 24 | ||
2019 |
$ | 22 | ||
2020 |
$ | 21 | ||
2021 |
$ | 17 | ||
2022 |
$ | 14 |
NOTE 11 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Measurements on a Nonrecurring Basis
2017 Fair Value Measurements on a Nonrecurring Basis
As part of the Synergy Program, the Business has or will shut down several manufacturing, R&D and administrative facilities around the world, including the write-down of other non-manufacturing assets. These assets, classified as Level 3 measurements, were written down to zero in the fourth quarter of 2017 using unobservable inputs, including assumptions a market participant would use to measure fair value of the group of assets, which included projected cash flows. The impairment charges, totaling $94 million, were included in Restructuring and asset-related charges net in the combined statements of income and other comprehensive income. See Note 4 for additional information on the Businesss restructuring activities.
21
NOTE 12 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Sundry Income (Expense) Net In millions |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Interest income |
$ | 40 | $ | 32 | ||||
Foreign exchange losses |
(3 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||
Gain on divestiture of DAS Divested Ag Business 1 |
671 | | ||||||
Loss on sale of other business |
| (2 | ) | |||||
Gain on sales of other assets and investments |
2 | 10 | ||||||
Loss related to Bayer CropScience arbitration matter 2 |
(469 | ) | | |||||
Other net |
| 10 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total sundry income (expense) net |
$ | 241 | $ | (20 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
1. |
See Note 5 for additional information. |
2. |
See Note 13 for additional information. |
Accounts Payable Other
Accounts payable Other was $570 million at December 31, 2017, which included Accounts Payable Trade Promotion of $366 million at December 31, 2017. No other component of Accounts payable Other was more than 5 percent of total current liabilities.
Accrued and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued and other current liabilities was $661 million at December 31, 2017, which included customer prepayments of $281 million at December 31, 2017. No other component of Accrued and other current liabilities was more than 5 percent of total current liabilities.
Other Noncurrent Obligations
Other noncurrent obligations was $169 million at December 31, 2017 which included deferred cash awards, environmental clean-up liability, long-term accounts payable and noncurrent deferred income. No component of Other noncurrent obligations was more than 5 percent of total liabilities.
NOTE 13 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Environmental Matters
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. These obligations are included in Accrued and other current liabilities and Other noncurrent obligations in the combined balance sheet. This is managements best estimate of the costs for remediation and restoration with respect to environmental matters for which the Business has accrued liabilities, although it is reasonably possible that the ultimate cost with respect to these particular matters could range up to approximately two times that amount. Consequently, it is reasonably possible that environmental remediation and restoration costs in excess of amounts accrued could have a material impact on the Businesss results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. It is the opinion of the Businesss management, however, that the possibility is remote that costs in excess of the range disclosed will have a material impact on the Businesss results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Inherent uncertainties exist in these estimates primarily due to unknown conditions, changing governmental regulations and legal standards regarding liability, and emerging remediation technologies for handling site remediation and restoration. The Business had accrued obligations of $35 million at December 31, 2017 for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs.
22
The following table summarizes the activity in the Businesss accrued obligations for environmental matters for the years ended December 31, 2017:
Accrued Obligations for Environmental Matters In millions |
2017 | |||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | 30 | ||
Additional accruals |
14 | |||
Payments against reserve |
(10 | ) | ||
Foreign currency impact |
1 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance at December 31 |
$ | 35 | ||
|
|
The amounts charged to income on a pretax basis related to environmental remediation totaled $14 million in 2017 and $11 million in 2016. Capital expenditures for environmental protection were $1 million in 2017 and $1 million in 2016.
Litigation
Bayer CropScience vs the Businesss ICC Arbitration
On August 13, 2012, Bayer CropScience AG and Bayer CropScience NV (together, Bayer) filed a request for arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) International Court of Arbitration against the Business under a 1992 license agreement executed by predecessors of the parties (the License Agreement). In its request for arbitration, Bayer alleged that (i) the Business breached the License Agreement, (ii) the License Agreement was properly terminated with no ongoing rights to the Business, (iii) the Business has infringed and continues to infringe its patent rights related to the use of the pat gene in certain soybean and cotton seed products, and (iv) Bayer is entitled to monetary damages and injunctive relief. The Business denied that it breached the License Agreement and asserted that the License Agreement remained in effect because it was not properly terminated. The Business also asserted that all of Bayers patents at issue are invalid and/or not infringed, and, therefore, for these reasons (and others), a license was not required. During the pendency of the arbitration proceeding, the Business filed six re-examination petitions with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) against the Bayer patents, asserting that each patent is invalid based on the doctrine against double-patenting and/or prior art. The USPTO granted all six petitions, and, on February 26, 2015, the USPTO issued an office action rejecting the patentability of the sole Bayer patent claim in the only asserted Bayer patent that has not expired (the 962 patent) and that forms the basis for the vast majority of the damages in the arbitral award discussed below.
A three-member arbitration tribunal (the tribunal) presided over the arbitration proceeding. In a decision dated October 9, 2015, the tribunal determined that (i) the Business breached the License Agreement, (ii) Bayer properly terminated the License Agreement, (iii) all of the patents remaining in the proceeding are valid and infringed, and (iv) that Bayer is entitled to monetary damages in the amount of $455 million inclusive of pre-judgment interest and costs (the arbitral award). One of the arbitrators, however, issued a partial dissent finding that all of the patents are invalid based on the double-patenting doctrine.
On October 16, 2015, Bayer filed a motion in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Federal District Court) seeking to confirm the arbitral award. The Business opposed the motion and filed separate motions to vacate the award, or in the alternative, to stay enforcement of the award until the USPTO issued final office actions with respect to the re-examination proceedings. On January 15, 2016, the Federal District Court denied the Businesss motions and confirmed the award. The Business appealed the Federal District Courts decision. On March 1, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) affirmed the arbitral award. As a result of this action, in the first quarter of 2017, the Business recorded a loss of $469 million, inclusive of the arbitral award and post-judgment interest, which was included in Sundry income (expense) net in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income. On May 19, 2017, the Federal Circuit
23
issued a mandate denying the Businesss request to stay the arbitral award pending judicial review by the United States Supreme Court. On May 26, 2017, the Business paid the $469 million arbitral award to Bayer as a result of that decision. On September 11, 2017, the Business filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court to review the case, but the Court denied the Businesss petition.
The litigation is now concluded with no risk of further liability. The Business continues to believe that the arbitral award is fundamentally flawed because, among other things, it allowed for the enforcement of invalid patents. The arbitral award and subsequent related judicial decisions will not impact the Businesss commercialization of its soybean and cotton seed products, including those containing the ENLIST technologies.
Other Litigation Matters
In addition to the Bayer matter, the Business is party to a number of other claims and lawsuits arising out of the normal course of business with respect to product liability, patent infringement, governmental regulation, contract and commercial litigation, and other actions. Certain of these actions purport to be class actions and seek damages in very large amounts. All such claims are being contested. The Business participates in an active risk management program consisting of numerous insurance policies secured from many carriers at various times. These policies may provide coverage that could be utilized to minimize the financial impact, if any, of certain contingencies described above. It is the opinion of the Businesss management that the possibility is remote that the aggregate of all such other claims and lawsuits will have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of the Business.
The Business insured certain litigation matters through the Dows insurance company. At December 31, 2017, litigation liability was $49 million included in Accrued and other current liabilities and Other noncurrent obligations. Insured litigation receivables were $40 million included in Accounts and notes receivable other.
Purchase Commitments
The Business has outstanding purchase commitments and various commitments for take-or-pay or throughput agreements. The Business was not aware of any purchase commitments that were negotiated as part of a financing arrangement for the facilities that will provide the contracted goods or services or for the costs related to those goods or services at December 31, 2017.
Guarantees
The following table provides a summary of final expiration, maximum future payments and recorded liability reflected in the balance sheet for guarantees:
December 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||
Guarantees In millions |
Final
Expiration |
Maximum
Future Payments |
Recorded
Liability |
|||||||||
Guarantees |
2023 | $ | 340 | $ | 5 |
Guarantees arise during the ordinary course of business from relationships with customers and nonconsolidated affiliates when the Business undertakes an obligation to guarantee the performance of others (via delivery of cash or other assets) if specified triggering events occur. With guarantees, such as financial contracts, non-performance by the guaranteed party triggers the obligation of the Business to make payments to the beneficiary of the guarantee. The majority of the Businesss guarantees relates to debt of nonconsolidated affiliates, which have expiration dates ranging from less than one year to three years, and trade financing transactions in Latin America, which typically expire within one year of inception. The Businesss current expectation is that future payment or performance related to the non-performance of others is considered remote.
24
NOTE 14 LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-Term Debt at December 31 In millions |
2017
Average Rate |
2017 | ||||||
Foreign currency loans, various rates and maturities |
4.86 | % | $ | 24 | ||||
Capital lease obligations |
| 5 | ||||||
Long-term debt due within one year |
| (6 | ) | |||||
|
|
|||||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 23 | ||||||
|
|
Annual Installments on Long-Term Debt for Next Five Years In millions |
||||
2018 |
$ | 5 | ||
2019 |
$ | 5 | ||
2020 |
$ | 3 | ||
2021 |
$ | 2 | ||
2022 |
$ | 3 |
The carrying value of long-term debt is representative of its fair value.
NOTE 15 PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
Single-Employer Pension Plans
The Business has single-employer defined benefit pension plans that covers employees in three countries outside United States. Each country has different benefit formulas and employee eligibility.
The Business funding policy is to contribute to the plans when pension laws or economics either require or encourage funding. In 2017, the Business contributed $3 million to its pension plans. The Business expects to contribute approximately $4 million to its pension plans in 2018.
The assumptions used to determine pension plan obligations and net periodic benefit costs are provided below:
Benefit Obligations
at December 31 |
Net Periodic Costs for the Year | |||||||||||
Assumptions for All Single-Employer Pension Plans |
2017 | 2017 | 2016 | |||||||||
Discount rate |
0.5% 3.3 | % | 1.5% 3.6 | % | 1.5% 3.9% | |||||||
Rate of increase in future compensation levels |
2.0% 4.0 | % | 2.0% 4.0 | % | 2.0% 4.0% | |||||||
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets |
| | 1.8% 7.0% |
The Business determines the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets by performing a detailed analysis of key economic and market factors driving historical returns for each asset class and formulating a projected return based on factors in the current environment. Factors considered include, but are not limited to, inflation, real economic growth, interest rate yield, interest rate spreads, and other valuation measures and market metrics. The expected long-term rate of return for each asset class is then weighted based on the strategic asset allocation approved by the governing body for each plan. The Businesss historical experience with the pension fund asset performance is also considered.
The accumulated benefit obligation for all single-employer defined benefit pension plans was $119 million at December 31, 2017.
25
Net Periodic Benefit Cost for all Single-Employer Pension Plans for the Year
In millions |
Defined Benefit
Pension Plans |
|||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Service cost |
$ | 4 | $ | 3 | ||||
Interest cost |
2 | 2 | ||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Amortization of unrecognized loss |
3 | 2 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 6 | $ | 4 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other
In millions |
Defined Benefit
Pension Plans |
|||||||
2017 | 2016 | |||||||
Net loss |
$ | 7 | $ | 8 | ||||
Amortization of net loss |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Other adjustment |
3 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss |
$ | 8 | $ | 6 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive loss |
$ | 14 | $ | 10 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Change in Projected Benefit Obligations, Plan Assets and Funded
In millions |
Defined Benefit
Pension Plans |
|||
2017 | ||||
Change in projected benefit obligation: |
||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
$ | 95 | ||
Service cost |
4 | |||
Interest cost |
2 | |||
Actuarial changes in assumptions and experience |
7 | |||
Acquisition/divestures/other activity |
17 | |||
Benefits paid |
(3 | ) | ||
The effect of foreign exchange rate |
11 | |||
|
|
|||
Benefit obligation at end of year |
$ | 133 | ||
|
|
|||
Change in plan assets: |
||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
$ | 38 | ||
Actual return on plan assets |
3 | |||
Employer contributions |
3 | |||
The effect of foreign exchange rates |
4 | |||
Benefits paid |
(3 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
$ | 45 | ||
|
|
|||
Funded status at end of year |
$ | (88 | ) | |
|
|
|||
Net amounts recognized in the combined balance sheet at December 31: |
||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
$ | (2 | ) | |
Pension and postretirement benefits noncurrent |
(86 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Net amounts recognized in the combined balance sheet |
$ | (88 | ) | |
|
|
|||
Pretax amounts recognized in AOCL at December 31: |
||||
Net loss |
$ | 44 | ||
|
|
|||
Pretax balance in AOCL at end of year |
$ | 44 | ||
|
|
26
In 2018, an estimated net loss of $3 million and prior service credit immaterial for the single-employer defined benefit pension plans will be amortized from AOCL to net periodic benefit cost.
Estimated Future Benefit Payments
The estimated future benefit payments, reflecting expected future service, as appropriate, are presented in the following table:
Estimated Future Benefit Payments at December 31, 2017 In millions |
Defined Benefit
Pension Plans |
|||
2018 |
$ | 7 | ||
2019 |
7 | |||
2020 |
8 | |||
2021 |
7 | |||
2022 |
8 | |||
2023 through 2027 |
36 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 73 | ||
|
|
Plan Assets
Plan assets totaled $45 million at December 31, 2017. The investments did not include DowDuPont stock and were comprised of other investments. The fair value of pension plan assets classified as Level 1 is $12 million based on unadjusted quoted price. The fair value classified as Level 2 is $29 million based on significant other observable inputs. The fair value classified as Level 3 is $4 million based on significant unobservable inputs.
Single-Employer Other Postretirement Benefits
The Business provides certain health care and life insurance benefits to retired employees. There is one single-employer plan, which is not significant to the Business. The total other post retirement plan net periodic costs included in the Businesss financial results amounted to less than $1 million at December 31, 2017 and less than $1 million at December 31, 2016.
Multi-Employer Defined Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans
The Business has a number of employees under various multi-employer defined benefit pension plans and other post retirement plans administered by Dow. The pension and other postretirement benefits obligation and net service cost of Dows plan are determined based on the actuarial valuations of individual participant data while projected returns on plan assets were also factored into the computation of net periodic pension and post-retirement cost. Cost associated with pension and other post retirement plans were allocated based on the Business employees proportionate share of costs for the respective Dow plans in which they participate. These cost are considered to have been settled with Dow at the time of allocation of these expenses to the Business. The pension and other post retirement plan expenses for the Businesss participating employees was $82 million in 2017 and $24 million in 2016.
Defined Contribution Plans
Dow offers defined contribution plans to eligible employees in United States whereby employees participate by contributing a portion of their compensation, which is partially matched by Dow. Dows contributions for defined contribution plans are allocated to the Business based on the headcount of the participating Business employees. Total contributions allocated to the Business were $38 million in 2017 and $38 million in 2016.
27
NOTE 16 LEASED PROPERTY
The Business has leases primarily for facilities and distribution equipment. Upon the termination of the leases, the Business has the option to purchase certain leased equipment and buildings based on a fair market value determination. The future minimum rental payments under leases with remaining noncancellable terms in excess of one year are as follows:
Minimum Lease Commitments at December 31, 2017 In millions |
||||
2018 |
$ | 28 | ||
2019 |
22 | |||
2020 |
17 | |||
2021 |
13 | |||
2022 |
5 | |||
2023 and thereafter |
16 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 101 | ||
|
|
Rental expenses under leases were $76 million in 2017 and $72 million in 2016.
NOTE 17 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES Consolidated Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)
At December 31, 2017, the Business holds a variable interest in one joint venture for which the Business is the primary beneficiary.
The joint venture is primarily involved in the agrochemicals and seed manufacturing business and have operating facilities in Brazil. The Businesss variable interests in the joint venture are related to arrangements between the joint venture and the Business. The arrangements with the joint venture are primarily related to toll manufacturing services provided by the joint venture.
Assets and Liabilities of Consolidated VIEs
The Businesss combined financial statements include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of this VIE for which the Business is the primary beneficiary. The other equity holders interests are reflected in Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income and Noncontrolling interests in the combined balance sheet. The following table summarizes the carrying amounts of this entitys assets and liabilities included in the Businesss combined balance sheet at December 31, 2017:
1. |
All assets were restricted at December 31, 2017. |
2. |
All liabilities were nonrecourse at December 31, 2017. |
28
Nonconsolidated Variable Interest Entities
The Business holds variable interest in the various K2 Pure legal entities (K2 Pure) that are involved producing various chlor-alkali products using salt, water and electricity. The variable interest in K2 Pure relates to several agreements pertaining to the construction, lease operations of an electro chemical unit at the Businesss Pittsburg, California site.
NOTE 18 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Dow provides stock-based compensation programs for employees (including those employed by the Business) in the form of an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) and stock incentive plans, which include stock options, deferred stock awards and performance-based deferred stock awards. Stock-based compensation awards vest over a specified period or upon employees meeting certain performance and retirement eligibility criteria. The fair value of equity instruments issued to employees is measured on the grant date.
In connection with the merger of Dow and DuPont, on August 31, 2017 (Conversion Date) all outstanding Dow stock options and deferred stock awards were converted into stock options and deferred stock awards with respect to DowDuPont common stock. The stock options and deferred stock awards have the same terms and conditions under the applicable plans and award agreements prior to the merger. All outstanding and nonvested performance deferred stock awards were converted into deferred stock awards with respect to DowDuPont common stock at the greater of the applicable performance target or the actual performance as of the effective time of the merger. Dow and DuPont did not merge their stock-based compensation plans as a result of the merger. The Dow stock-based compensation plans were assumed by DowDuPont and continue in place with the ability to grant and issue DowDuPont common stock.
Awards based solely on service are recognized over the vesting period or from the grant date to the date on which retirement eligibility provisions have been met and additional service is no longer required. Performance-based deferred stock awards vest when Dow attains specified performance targets over a predetermined period, generally one to three years.
Compensation expense related to performance deferred stock awards is recognized over the lesser of the service or performance period. Changes in the fair value of liability instruments are recognized as compensation expense.
The Businesss employees participate in Dows stock-based compensation programs and their awards are based on DowDuPont stock and Dow metrics. Compensation expense of $30 million in 2017 and $24 million in 2016 related to these programs is included in Cost of sales, Research and development expenses, and Selling, general and administrative expenses, as applicable, based on the Businesss employees who participated in the programs. As of December 31, 2017, total compensation cost related to non-vested awards not yet recognized approximated $17 million; it is anticipated that this amount would be recognized over approximately two years.
NOTE 19 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During 2017 and 2016, the Business purchased products used in production from Dow in the amount of $118 million and $96 million respectively.
Effective with the Merger, the Business reports transaction with DuPont and its affiliates as related party transaction. Transactions with DuPont and its affiliates in the period from September 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 were $25 million.
NOTE 20 INCOME TAXES
During the periods presented, the Businesss operations are included in the consolidated U.S. federal, certain state and local and foreign income tax returns filed by DowDuPont, where applicable. The Business also files
29
certain separate state and local and foreign income tax returns. The income tax provision (benefit) included in these Combined Financial Statements has been calculated using the separate return basis, as if the Business entities filed separate tax returns. It is possible that the Business will make different tax accounting elections and assertions subsequent to separation. Therefore, the Businesss income taxes, as presented in the Combined Financial Statements, may not be indicative of the income taxes that the Business will generate in the future.
The differences between income taxes computed using the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate and the provision for income taxes from operations were as follows:
Reconciliation to U.S. Statutory Rate |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate |
35.0 | % | 35.0 | % | ||||
Impact of equity earnings and partnerships |
(2.3 | ) | (0.3 | ) | ||||
Foreign income taxed at rates other than 35% |
(8.8 | ) | 1.7 | |||||
U.S. tax effect of foreign earnings and dividends |
(3.0 | ) | (43.3 | ) | ||||
Unrecognized tax benefits |
| 0.1 | ||||||
Changes in valuation allowances |
65.6 | (1.7 | ) | |||||
Impact of U.S. tax reform |
(11.6 | ) | | |||||
State and local income taxes |
1.7 | 1.5 | ||||||
Acquisitions, divestitures and ownership restructuring activities |
7.7 | | ||||||
Excess tax benefits from stock compensation |
(1.6 | ) | | |||||
Changes in prior period estimates |
(3.5 | ) | (0.2 | ) | ||||
Other |
0.7 | (0.3 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effective Tax Rate |
79.9 | % | (7.5 | )% | ||||
|
|
|
|
30
The significant components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
2017 | ||||||||
Deferred Tax Balances at December 31 In millions |
Assets | Liabilities | ||||||
Property |
$ | 18 | $ | (9 | ) | |||
Tax loss and credit carryforwards |
531 | | ||||||
Postretirement benefit obligation |
29 | | ||||||
Other accruals and reserves |
99 | (3 | ) | |||||
Intangibles |
48 | (42 | ) | |||||
Inventory |
22 | (16 | ) | |||||
Investments |
2 | (224 | ) | |||||
Other net |
14 | (15 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Subtotal |
$ | 763 | $ | (309 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Valuation allowances |
(522 | ) | | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 241 | $ | (309 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
Based on the evaluation of available positive and negative evidence, including the evaluation of expected reversals of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, taxable income in prior carryback years, estimates of projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies, the Business recognized a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets, including certain net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards and deductible temporary differences, that are not more likely than not realizable equal to $522 million at December 31, 2017. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, valuation allowances increased by $403 million. The $403 million increase in 2017 is primarily related to a change in the Businesss ability, a direct result of the Act, to generate and rely on sufficient levels of future foreign source income as a source of income when assessing its foreign tax credits for realizability.
Operating Loss and Tax Credit Carryforwards In millions |
2017 | |||
Operating loss carryforwards |
||||
Expire within 5 years |
$ | 18 | ||
Expire after 5 years or indefinite expiration |
110 | |||
|
|
|||
Total operating loss carryforwards |
$ | 128 | ||
|
|
|||
Tax credit carryforwards |
||||
Expire within 5 years |
$ | 18 | ||
Expire after 5 years or indefinite expiration |
385 | |||
|
|
|||
Total tax credit carryforwards |
$ | 403 | ||
|
|
|||
Total operating loss and tax credit carryforwards |
$ | 531 | ||
|
|
Undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries and related companies that are deemed to be permanently reinvested amounted to $608 million at December 31, 2017 and $3,184 million at December 31, 2016. The Act imposed U.S. tax on all foreign unrepatriated earnings. These undistributed earnings are still subject to certain taxes upon repatriation, primarily where foreign withholding taxes apply. At this time, it is not practicable to calculate the unrecognized deferred tax liability on the indefinitely reinvested undistributed foreign earnings.
31
The following table provides a reconciliation of the Businesss unrecognized tax benefits:
Total Gross Unrealized Tax Benefits In millions |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Total unrecognized tax benefits at January 1 |
$ | 0.2 | $ | 0.1 | ||||
Decreases related to positions taken on items from prior years |
| | ||||||
Increases related to positions taken on items from prior years |
| 0.1 | ||||||
Increases related to positions taken in the current year |
| | ||||||
Settlement of uncertain tax positions with tax authorities |
| | ||||||
Decreases due to expiration of statutes of limitations |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total unrecognized tax benefits at December 31 |
$ | 0.2 | $ | 0.2 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the effective tax rate |
$ | 0.2 | $ | 0.2 | ||||
Total amount of interest and penalties (benefit) recognized in Provision for income taxes |
$ | (0.2 | ) | $ | 0.4 | |||
Total accrual for interest and penalties recognized in the consolidated balance sheets |
$ | 0.3 | $ | 0.5 |
The Business recognizes the financial statement effects of an uncertain income tax position when it is more likely than not, based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. At December 31, 2017 , the Business had recorded unrecognized tax benefits related to foreign issues of $0.2 million.
If recognized, approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, of the unrecognized tax benefits would reduce Dows effective tax rate. It is not expected that the unrecognized tax benefits will decrease within the next 12 months.
Interest and penalties related to income taxes are classified as a component of income tax expense. Accrued interest and penalties related to income taxes were $0.3 million and $0.5 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Interest and penalties recognized in the provision for income taxes for the years ending December 31, 2017 and 2016 were a benefit of $0.2 million and an expense of $0.4 million, respectively.
Each year, the Business files tax returns in the various national, state and local income taxing jurisdictions in which it operates. These tax returns are subject to examination and possible challenge by the tax authorities. Positions challenged by the tax authorities may be settled or appealed by the Business. As a result, there is an uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the Businesss financial statements in accordance with accounting for income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The impact on the Businesss results of operations is not expected to be material.
Tax years that remain subject to examination for the Businesss major tax jurisdictions are shown below:
32
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
On December 22, 2017, the Act was enacted. The Act reduces the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously deferred, creates new provisions related to foreign sourced earnings, eliminates the domestic manufacturing deduction and moves to a territorial system. At December 31, 2017, the Business had not completed its accounting for the tax effects of The Act; however, as described below, the Business made a reasonable estimate of the effects on its existing deferred tax balances and the one-time transition tax. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (SAB 118), income tax effects of The Act may be refined upon obtaining, preparing, or analyzing additional information during the measurement period and such changes could be material. During the measurement period, provisional amounts may also be adjusted for the effects, if any, of interpretative guidance issued after December 31, 2017, by U.S. regulatory and standard-setting bodies.
|
As a result of The Act, the Business remeasured its U.S. federal deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21 percent. However, the Business is still analyzing certain aspects of The Act and refining its calculations, which could potentially affect the measurement of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts. The provisional amount recorded related to the remeasurement of the Businesss deferred tax balance was $97 million, recorded as a benefit to Provision for income taxes. |
|
The Act requires a mandatory deemed repatriation of post-1986 undistributed foreign earnings and profits (E&P), which results in a one- time transition tax. As a result, the Business recorded a provisional amount for the transition tax liability for its foreign subsidiaries of $31 million, recorded as a charge to Provision for income taxes. The Business has not yet completed its calculation of the total post-1986 foreign E&P for its foreign subsidiaries as E&P will not be finalized until the DowDuPont federal income tax return is filed. Further, the transition tax is based in part on the amount of those earnings held in cash and other specified assets, which is a defined term under The Act. |
|
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, The Act introduces new provisions for U.S. taxation of certain global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI). Due to its complexity and a current lack of guidance as to how to calculate the tax, the Business is not yet able to determine a reasonable estimate for the impact of the incremental tax liability. When additional guidance is available, the Business will make a policy election for how the additional liability will be recorded in the period in which it is incurred or recognized for the basis differences that would be expected to reverse in future years. |
33
NOTE 21 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The following table summarizes the changes and after-tax balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss In millions |
Cumulative
Translation Adj |
Pension and
Other Postretirement Benefits |
Accum Other
Comp Loss |
|||||||||
2016 |
||||||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2016 |
$ | (673 | ) | $ | (26 | ) | $ | (699 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications |
(159 | ) | (159 | ) | ||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (159 | ) | $ | (4 | ) | $ | (163 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
$ | (832 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (862 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
2017 |
||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications |
69 | 69 | ||||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
(4 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 69 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 65 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
$ | (763 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (797 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects on the net activity related to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
Tax Benefit (Expense) In millions |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
$ | (40 | ) | $ | 34 | |||
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans |
2 | 1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total benefit (expense) from income taxes related to other comprehensive income (loss) items |
$ | (38 | ) | $ | 35 | |||
|
|
|
|
NOTE 22 NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
Ownership interests in the Businesss subsidiaries held by parties other than the Business are presented separately from the Business equity in the combined balance sheet as Noncontrolling interests. The amount of combined net income attributable to the Business and the noncontrolling interests are both presented on the face of the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
The following table summarizes the activity for equity attributable to noncontrolling interests for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
Noncontrolling Interests In millions |
2017 | 2016 | ||||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | 38 | $ | 34 | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
24 | 14 | ||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(19 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
Other |
(2 | ) | 2 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at December 31 |
$ | 41 | $ | 38 | ||||
|
|
|
|
34
NOTE 23 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Other than those described in the notes to the combined financial statements, no events have occurred after December 31, 2017, but before October 17, 2018, the date the financial statements were available to be issued, that require consideration as adjustments to, or disclosures in, the combined financial statements.
35
The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
Combined Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
In millions (Unaudited) |
June 30,
2018 |
June 30,
2017 |
||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 3,208 | $ | 3,166 | ||||
Cost of sales |
2,022 | 1,996 | ||||||
Research and development expenses |
239 | 277 | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
382 | 402 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
11 | 8 | ||||||
Restructuring and asset related charges (credits) net |
123 | (1 | ) | |||||
Equity in earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates |
2 | 1 | ||||||
Sundry income (expenses) net |
16 | (420 | ) | |||||
Interest expense |
21 | 15 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income before income taxes |
428 | 50 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Provision (credit) for income taxes |
121 | (68 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income |
307 | 118 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
11 | 21 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net income attributable to the Business |
296 | 97 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
(44 | ) | 49 | |||||
Pension and other postretirement benefit plan |
1 | 3 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total other comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (43 | ) | $ | 52 | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income |
264 | 170 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
11 | 21 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Comprehensive income attributable to the Business |
$ | 253 | $ | 149 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
2
The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
In millions (Unaudited) |
June 30,
2018 |
Dec 31,
2017 |
||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current Assets |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 74 | $ | 106 | ||||
Accounts and notes receivable: |
||||||||
Trade (net of allowance for doubtful receivables 2018: $54; 2017: $56) |
1,916 | 1,345 | ||||||
Other |
525 | 498 | ||||||
Inventories |
1,835 | 1,897 | ||||||
Other current assets |
134 | 116 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
4,484 | 3,962 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investment in nonconsolidated affiliates |
53 | 51 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Property |
||||||||
Property |
3,697 | 3,724 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation |
2,343 | 2,324 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net property |
1,354 | 1,400 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Assets |
||||||||
Goodwill |
1,344 | 1,344 | ||||||
Other intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization 2018: $347; 2017: $334) |
193 | 197 | ||||||
Noncurrent receivables |
37 | 48 | ||||||
Deferred income tax assets |
150 | 151 | ||||||
Deferred charges and other assets |
51 | 54 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total other assets |
1,775 | 1,794 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Assets |
$ | 7,666 | $ | 7,207 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||
Current Liabilities |
||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 12 | $ | 2 | ||||
Long-term debt due within one year |
5 | 6 | ||||||
Accounts payable: |
||||||||
Trade |
503 | 616 | ||||||
Other |
1,111 | 570 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
144 | 144 | ||||||
Accrued and other current liabilities |
406 | 661 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
2,181 | 1,999 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-Term Debt (variable interest entities nonrecourse 2018: $12; 2017: $15) |
21 | 23 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Other Noncurrent Liabilities |
||||||||
Deferred income tax liabilities |
225 | 219 | ||||||
Pension and other postretirement benefits |
133 | 136 | ||||||
Other noncurrent obligations |
180 | 169 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total other noncurrent liabilities |
538 | 524 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Combined Equity |
||||||||
Net parent investment |
5,736 | 5,417 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(840 | ) | (797 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Business equity |
4,896 | 4,620 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Noncontrolling interests |
30 | 41 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total combined equity |
4,926 | 4,661 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Liabilities and Combined Equity |
$ | 7,666 | $ | 7,207 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
3
The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
Combined Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
In millions (Unaudited) |
June 30,
2018 |
June 30,
2017 |
||||||
Operating Activities |
||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 307 | $ | 118 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
96 | 101 | ||||||
Provision (Credit) for deferred income tax |
8 | (111 | ) | |||||
Earnings of nonconsolidated affiliates less than (in excess of) dividends received |
(2 | ) | 1 | |||||
Net loss on sales of investments |
1 | | ||||||
Net gain on sales of property, businesses and consolidated companies |
(24 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Net loss on sales of ownership interests in nonconsolidated affiliates |
| 3 | ||||||
Restructuring and asset related charges (credits) net |
123 | (1 | ) | |||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Trade Accounts receivable |
(571 | ) | (199 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
62 | (163 | ) | |||||
Trade Accounts payable |
(113 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Other assets and liabilities |
114 | 191 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
1 | (66 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Investing Activities |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(67 | ) | (47 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sales of property, businesses and consolidated companies, net of cash divested |
35 | 3 | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of ownership interest in nonconsolidated affiliates |
| 30 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash used in investing activities |
(32 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Financing Activities |
||||||||
Net transfers from (to) parent |
23 | (70 | ) | |||||
Changes in short-term notes payable |
1 | 2 | ||||||
Payments on long-term debt |
(2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||
Contingent payment for acquisition of businesses |
| (31 | ) | |||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(23 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash used in financing activities |
(1 | ) | (112 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Summary |
||||||||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(32 | ) | (192 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
106 | 358 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 74 | $ | 166 | ||||
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
4
The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
In millions (Unaudited) |
Net Parent
Investment |
Accum Other
Comp Loss |
Non-controlling
Interests |
Total Equity | ||||||||||||
2017 |
||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2016 |
$ | 5,892 | $ | (862 | ) | $ | 38 | $ | 5,068 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net Income |
97 | | 21 | 118 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income |
| 52 | | 52 | ||||||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest and other |
| | (11 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Net transfers from (to) parent |
(70 | ) | | | (70 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2017 |
$ | 5,919 | $ | (810 | ) | $ | 48 | $ | 5,157 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
2018 |
||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2017 |
$ | 5,417 | $ | (797 | ) | $ | 41 | $ | 4,661 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net Income |
296 | | 11 | 307 | ||||||||||||
Other comprehensive (loss) |
| (43 | ) | | (43 | ) | ||||||||||
Distribution to noncontrolling interest and others |
| | (22 | ) | (22 | ) | ||||||||||
Net transfers from (to) parent |
23 | | | 23 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2018 |
$ | 5,736 | $ | (840 | ) | $ | 30 | $ | 4,926 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
5
The Dow Agricultural Sciences Business
Notes to the Combined Financial Statements
NOTE 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
The accompanying combined financial statements present the combined assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses related to the Agricultural Sciences Business (the Business) of The Dow Chemical Company (Dow or the Company). The Business leverages the Companys technology, customer relationships and industry knowledge to improve the quantity, quality and safety of the global food supply and the global production agriculture industry. Land available for worldwide agricultural production is increasingly limited so production growth will need to be achieved principally through improving crop yields and productivity. The business serves the global production agriculture industry with crop protection products for weed control, disease control and insect control offerings for foliar or soil application or as a seed treatment. It is also a global leader in providing seed/plant biotechnology products and technologies to improve the productivity and profitability of its customers.
NOTE 2 SUMMARY OF SIGNFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The combined financial statements present the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows of the Business and have been derived from the consolidated financial statements and accounting records of Dow using the historical results of operations and historical basis of assets and liabilities of the Business. The combined financial statements of the Business have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and accounted for as a private company. These combined financial statements reflect all adjustments (including normal recurring accruals) which, in the opinion of management, are considered necessary for the fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. Investments in nonconsolidated affiliates (20-50 percent owned companies, joint ventures and partnerships) are accounted for using the equity method.
The combined statements of income and comprehensive income include allocations of certain expenses for services from Dow, including, but not limited to, general corporate expenses related to finance, legal, information technology, human resources, ethics and compliance, shared services, employee benefits and incentives, insurance and stock-based compensation. These expenses have been allocated on the basis of direct usage when identifiable, with the remainder allocated on the basis of headcount or other measures. The Business considers the basis on which the expenses have been allocated to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided. The allocations may not, however, reflect the expense the Business would have incurred as a stand-alone company. The amount of actual costs that may have been incurred if the Business was a stand-alone company would depend on a number of factors, including the Businesss chosen organizational structure, what functions were outsourced or performed by the Business employees, and strategic decisions made in areas such as information technology and infrastructure.
All debt and debt-related interest cost incurred by the Business has been recorded in the combined financial statements.
As a direct ownership relationship did not exist among the various operations comprising the Business, a Net parent investment account is shown in lieu of stockholders equity in the combined financial statements. All significant transactions between Dow and the Business have been included in the combined financial statements and were settled for cash through Dows centralized cash management system. The total net effect of the settlement of these related party transactions is reflected in the combined statements of cash flows as a financing activity and net parent investment in the combined balance sheet.
6
Significant Accounting Policy Update
The Businesss significant accounting policy for revenue was updated as a result of the adoption of Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (Topic 606):
Revenue
The Business recognizes revenue when its customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the Business expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. To determine revenue recognition for the arrangements that the Business determines are within the scope of Topic 606, the Business performs the following five steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. See Notes 3 and 4 for additional information on revenue recognition.
NOTE 3 RECENT ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
In the second quarter of 2018, the Business early adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities, which amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation under ASC 815, with the objectives of improving the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entitys risk management activities and simplifying the application of hedge accounting by preparers. The new standard expands the strategies eligible for hedge accounting, relaxes the timing requirements of hedge documentation and effectiveness assessments, and permits, in certain cases, the use of qualitative assessments on an ongoing basis to assess hedge effectiveness. The new guidance also requires new disclosures and presentation. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period after issuance of the ASU. Entities must adopt the new guidance by applying a modified retrospective approach to hedging relationships existing as of the adoption date. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In the second quarter of 2018, the Business early adopted ASU 2018-02, Income Statement Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to net parent investment for stranded tax effects resulting from Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (The Act), which was enacted on December 22, 2017, and requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. An entity has the option of applying the new guidance at the beginning of the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in which the tax effects related to items remaining in accumulated other comprehensive income are recognized. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period for reporting periods in which the financial statements have not yet been issued. The Businesss adoption of the new standard was applied prospectively at the beginning of the second quarter of 2018, with a reclassification of the stranded tax effects as a result of The Act from accumulated other comprehensive loss to net parent investment.
In the first quarter of 2018, the Business adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is the new comprehensive revenue recognition standard that supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry specific guidance. The standards core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to a customer in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In 2015 and 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued additional ASUs related to Topic 606 that delayed the effective date of the guidance and clarified various
7
aspects of the new revenue guidance, including principal versus agent considerations, identification of performance obligations, and accounting for licenses, and included other improvements and practical expedients. The new guidance was effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Business elected to adopt the new guidance using the modified retrospective transition method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. The Business recognized the cumulative effect of applying the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of net parent investment at the beginning of the first quarter of 2018. The comparative periods have not been restated and continue to be accounted for under Topic 605. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In the first quarter of 2018, the Businesss adopted ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statements of cash flows and addresses eight specific cash flow issues. The new standard was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In the first quarter of 2018, the Business adopted ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires an entity to recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. The amendments were effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The new guidance was applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to net parent investment at the beginning of the first quarter of 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In the first quarter of 2018, the Business adopted ASU 2017-07, Compensation Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which amends the requirements related to the income statement presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for employer sponsored defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Under the new guidance, an entity must disaggregate and present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost in the same income statement line items as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period, and only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization. Other components of net periodic benefit cost must be presented separately from the line items that includes the service cost. The new standard was effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Entities were required to use a retrospective transition method to adopt the requirement for separate income statement presentation of the service cost and other components, and a prospective transition method to adopt the requirement to limit the capitalization of benefit cost to the service component. Accordingly, in the first quarter of 2018, the Business used a retrospective transition method to reclassify net periodic benefit cost, other than the service component, from Cost of sales, Research and development expenses and Selling, general and administrative expenses to Sundry income (expense)net in the consolidated statements of income.
Accounting Guidance Issued But Not Adopted at June 30, 2018
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. The new guidance requires that a lessee recognize assets and liabilities for leases with lease terms of more than twelve months and recognition, presentation and measurement in the financial statements will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. In addition, the new guidance will require disclosures to help investors and other financial statement users better understand the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. Lessor accounting remains largely unchanged from current U.S. GAAP but does contain some targeted improvements to align with the new revenue recognition guidance issued in 2014 (Topic 606). The
8
new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, using a modified retrospective approach, and early adoption is permitted. The Business has a cross-functional team in place to evaluate and implement the new guidance. The team continues to review existing lease arrangements and has engaged a third party to assist with the collection of lease data. The impact of applying the practical expedients and accounting policy elections has been evaluated and the Business is in the process of documenting the related considerations and decisions. The Business is currently implementing a software solution, enhancing accounting systems and updating business processes and controls related to leases. Collectively, these activities are expected to facilitate the Businesss ability to meet the new accounting and disclosure requirements upon adoption in the first quarter of 2019. The Business is working to quantify the impact and anticipates that the adoption of the new standard will result in a material increase in lease-related assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
NOTE 4 REVENUE
Revenue Recognition
The majority of the Businesss revenue is derived from product sales. In the six months ended June 30, 2018, over 99 percent of the Businesss sales related to product sales (97 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2017). The remaining sales were primarily related to licensing of patents and technologies. As of January 1, 2018, the Business accounts for revenue in accordance with Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Product Sales
Product sales consist of sales of the Businesss products to manufacturers, distributors and farmers. The Business considers order confirmations or purchase orders, which in some cases are governed by master supply agreements, to be contracts with a customer. Product sale contracts are generally short-term contracts where the time between order confirmation and satisfaction of all performance obligations is less than one year. However, the Business has some long-term contracts which can span multiple years.
Revenues from product sales are recognized when the customer obtains control of the Businesss product, which occurs at a point in time, usually upon shipment, with payment terms typically in the range of 60 to 120 days after invoicing, depending on business and geographic region. When the Business performs shipping and handling activities after the transfer of control to the customer (e.g., when control transfers prior to shipment), these are considered fulfillment activities, and accordingly, the costs are accrued when the related revenue is recognized. Taxes collected from customers relating to product sales and remitted to governmental authorities are excluded from revenues. The Business has elected to use the practical expedient to expense cash and non-cash sales incentives, as the amortization period for the costs to obtain the contract would have been one year or less.
The transaction price includes estimates for reductions in revenue from customer rebates and right of returns on product sales. These amounts are estimated based upon the most likely amount of consideration to which the customer will be entitled. The Businesss obligation for right of returns is limited primarily to the Seed principal product group. All estimates are based on historical experience, anticipated performance and the Businesss best judgment at the time to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of revenue recognized will not occur. All estimates for variable consideration are reassessed periodically. The Business has elected the practical expedient to not adjust the amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component for all instances in which the period between payment and transfer of the goods will be one year or less.
For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the Business allocates the transaction price to each performance obligation based on the relative standalone selling price. The standalone selling price is the observable price which depicts the price as if sold to a similar customer in similar circumstances.
9
Patents, Trademarks and Licenses
The Business enters into licensing arrangements in which it licenses certain rights of its patents and technology to customers. Revenue from the majority of the Businesss licenses for patents and technology is derived from sales-based royalties. The Business estimates the amount of sales-based royalties it expects to be entitled based on historical sales to the customer. For the remaining revenue from licensing arrangements, payments are typically received from the Businesss licensees based on billing schedules established in each contract. Revenue is recognized by the Business when the performance obligation is satisfied. The income statement effects of patents, trademarks and licensing revenue were immaterial.
Remaining Performance Obligations
Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price allocated to unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied performance obligations. At June 30, 2018, the Business had remaining performance obligations related to material rights granted to customers for contract renewal options of $99 million. The Business expects revenue to be recognized for the remaining performance obligations over the next one to six years.
The remaining performance obligations are for product sales that have expected durations of one year or less or variable consideration attributable to royalties for licenses of patents and technology.
Disaggregation of Revenue
The Business disaggregates its revenue from contracts with customers by principal product group and geographic region, as the Business believes it best depicts the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of its revenue and cash flows. See details in the tables below:
Net Trade Revenue by Principal Product Group In millions |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2018 |
|||
Crop Protection |
$ | 2,568 | ||
Seed |
640 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 3,208 | ||
|
|
|||
Net Trade Revenue by Geographic Region In millions |
Six Months
Ended June 30, 2018 |
|||
US & Canada |
$ | 1,579 | ||
EMEA 1 |
781 | |||
Asia Pacific |
348 | |||
Latin America |
500 | |||
|
|
|||
Total |
$ | 3,208 | ||
|
|
1. |
Europe, Middle East and Africa. |
Contract Balances
The Business receives payments from customers based upon contractual billing schedules. Accounts receivable are recorded when the right to consideration becomes unconditional. Contract assets include amounts related to the Businesss contractual right to consideration for unfulfilled performance obligations. Contract liabilities include payments received in advance of performance under the contract and are realized when the associated revenue is recognized under the contract. Contract liabilities current primarily reflects deferred revenue from prepayments from customers for product to be delivered in a time period of 12 months or less. Contract liabilities noncurrent includes advance payments that the Business has received from customers related to long-term supply agreements and royalty payments that are deferred and recognized over the life of the contract.
10
Revenue recognized in the first six months of 2018 from amounts included in contract liabilities at the beginning of the period was insignificant. In the first six months of 2018, the amount of contract assets reclassified to receivables as a result of the right to the transaction consideration becoming unconditional was insignificant. The Business did not recognize any asset impairment charges related to contract assets during the period.
The following table summarizes the contract balances at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
Contract Balances In millions |
June 30,
2018 |
Dec 31,
2017 |
||||||
Accounts and notes receivable Trade |
$ | 1,916 | $ | 1,345 | ||||
Contract assets current 1 |
17 | 16 | ||||||
Contract assets noncurrent 2 |
44 | 43 | ||||||
Contract liabilities current 3 |
30 | 29 | ||||||
Contract liabilities noncurrent 4 |
70 | 70 |
1. |
Included in Other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets. |
2. |
Included in Deferred charges and other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. |
3. |
Included in Accrued and other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. |
4. |
Included in Other noncurrent obligations in the consolidated balance sheets. |
NOTE 5 RESTRUCTURING AND ASSET RELATED CHARGES (CREDITS) NET
Restructuring Plans
DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program
In September and November 2017, DowDuPont Inc. (DowDuPont) approved post-merger restructuring actions under the DowDuPont Cost Synergy Program (the Synergy Program), which is designed to integrate and optimize the organization following the merger and in preparation for the intended separation of DowDuPonts agriculture business.
As a result of these actions, the Business recorded pretax restructuring charges of $181 million, consisting of severance and related benefit costs of $47 million, asset write-downs and write-offs of $94 million and costs associated with exit and disposal activities of $40 million. The impact of these charges is shown as Restructuring and asset related charges net in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
Synergy Program In millions |
Severance and
Related Benefit Costs |
Assets Write-
downs and Write- offs |
Cost Associated
with Exit and Disposal Activities |
Total | ||||||||||||
2017 Restructuring Charges |
$ | 47 | $ | 94 | $ | 40 | $ | 181 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Charges against the reserve |
| (94 | ) | | (94 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash payments |
(13 | ) | | | (13 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Reserve balance at Dec 31, 2017 |
$ | 34 | $ | | $ | 40 | $ | 74 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjustments to the reserve |
44 | 57 | 24 | 125 | ||||||||||||
Charges against the reserve |
| (57 | ) | | (57 | ) | ||||||||||
Cash payments |
(28 | ) | | (27 | ) | (55 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Reserve balance at June 30, 2018 |
$ | 50 | $ | | $ | 37 | $ | 87 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
The Business uses Sundry income (expense) net to record a variety of income and expense items such as foreign currency exchange gains and losses, interest income, dividends from investments, gains and losses on
11
sales of investments and assets, non-operating pension and other postretirement benefit plan credits or costs, and certain litigation matters. For the six months ended June 30, 2018, Sundry income (expense) net was income of $16 million compared with expense of $420 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The Sundry income (expense) net balance for the first six months of 2017 included a $469 million loss related to the Bayer CropScience arbitration matter. See Note 10 for additional information.
Accounts Payable Other
Accounts payable Other was $1,111 million at June 30, 2018 which mainly included Accounts Payable Trade Promotion of $814 million and was $570 million at December 31, 2017 which mainly included Accounts Payable Trade Promotion of $366 million.
NOTE 7 INCOME TAXES
During the periods presented, the Businesss operations are included in the consolidated U.S. federal, certain state and local and foreign income tax returns filed by DowDuPont, where applicable. The Business also files certain separate state and local and foreign income tax returns. The income tax provision (benefit) included in these Combined Financial Statements has been calculated using the separate return basis, as if the Business entities filed separate tax returns. It is possible that the Business will make different tax accounting elections and assertions subsequent to separation. Therefore, the Businesss income taxes, as presented in the Combined Financial Statements, may not be indicative of the income taxes that the Business will generate in the future. In jurisdictions where the Business has been included in tax returns filed by DowDuPont, any income taxes payable resulting from the related income tax provisions have been reflected in the balance sheet within Net Parent Investment.
The effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was 28.3 percent compared to (133.8) percent for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The effective tax rates for these periods are based on the current estimate of full year results including the effect of taxes related to discrete events which are recorded in the interim period in which they occur. The effective income tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was favorably impacted by the reduced U.S. federal corporate income tax rate and unfavorably impacted by non-deductible restructuring costs and certain provisions in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (The Act) related to the taxability of foreign earnings. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was favorably impacted by the geographic mix of earnings, as well as a discrete income tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2017 in connection with the Bayer CropScience arbitration matter.
On December 22, 2017, The Act was enacted. The Act reduces the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 21 percent, requires companies to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously deferred, creates new provisions related to foreign sourced earnings, eliminates the domestic manufacturing deduction and moves towards a territorial system. At June 30, 2018, the Business had not completed its accounting for the tax effects of The Act; however, as described below, the Business made reasonable estimates of the effects on its existing deferred tax balances and the one-time transition tax. In accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 118, income tax effects of The Act may be refined upon obtaining, preparing, or analyzing additional information during the measurement period and such changes could be material. During the measurement period, provisional amounts may also be adjusted for the effects, if any, of interpretative guidance issued by U.S. regulatory and standard-setting bodies.
|
As a result of The Act, the Business remeasured its U.S. federal deferred tax assets and liabilities based on the rates at which they are expected to reverse in the future, which is generally 21 percent. However, the Business is still analyzing certain aspects of The Act and refining its calculations, which could potentially affect the measurement of these balances or potentially give rise to new deferred tax amounts. The provisional amount recorded related to the remeasurement of the Businesss deferred tax balance was $97 million, recorded as a benefit to Provision for income taxes. |
12
|
The Act requires a mandatory deemed repatriation of post-1986 undistributed foreign earnings and profits (E&P), which results in a one-time transition tax. As a result, the Business recorded a provisional amount for the transition tax liability for its foreign subsidiaries of $31 million, recorded as a charge to Provision for income taxes. The Business has not yet completed its calculation of the total post-1986 foreign E&P for its foreign subsidiaries as E&P will not be finalized until the DowDuPont federal income tax return is filed. Further, the transition tax is based in part on the amount of those earnings held in cash and other specified assets, which is a defined term under The Act. |
|
For tax years beginning after December 31, 2017, The Act introduces new provisions for U.S. taxation of certain global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI). Due to its complexity and a current lack of guidance as to how to calculate the tax, the Business is not yet able to determine a reasonable estimate for the impact of the incremental tax liability. When additional guidance is available, the Business will make a policy election for how the additional liability will be recorded in the period in which it is incurred or recognized for the basis differences that would be expected to reverse in future years. |
Each year the Business files tax returns in the various national, state and local income taxing jurisdictions in which it operates. These tax returns are subject to examination and possible challenge by the tax authorities. Positions challenged by the tax authorities may be settled or appealed by the Business. As a result, there is an uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the Businesss financial statements in accordance with accounting for income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. The ultimate resolution of such uncertainties is not expected to have a material impact on the Businesss results of operations.
NOTE 8 INVENTORIES
The following table provides a breakdown of inventories:
Inventories In millions |
June 30,
2018 |
Dec 31,
2017 |
||||||
Finished goods |
$ | 942 | $ | 951 | ||||
Work in process |
694 | 731 | ||||||
Raw materials |
155 | 164 | ||||||
Supplies |
44 | 51 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 1,835 | $ | 1,897 | ||||
|
|
|
|
NOTE 9 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
The Businesss trade accounts receivable for the periods presented were subject to inclusion in Dows various trade accounts receivable securitization programs whereby trade accounts receivable of select entities were sold on a revolving basis to certain multi-seller commercial paper conduit entities. The loss on the sale of receivables is recorded as interest expense by Dow; none of this loss is allocated to the Business. In 2017, Dow held a beneficial interest in certain conduits that were recorded as an asset on Dows balance sheet. This asset is considered part of Dows centralized cash and debt management activities, and as such, no portion of the asset has been allocated to the Business. The Business did not derecognize any trade accounts receivable from the combined balance sheet at June 30, 2018. Trade accounts receivable derecognized from the combined balance sheet of the Business were $275 million at December 31, 2017.
NOTE 10 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Environmental Matters
Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated based on current law and existing technologies. These obligations are included in Accrued and other current liabilities and Other noncurrent obligations in the
13
combined balance sheet. This is managements best estimate of the costs for remediation and restoration with respect to environmental matters for which the Business has accrued liabilities, although it is reasonably possible that the ultimate cost with respect to these particular matters could range up to approximately two times that amount. Consequently, it is reasonably possible that environmental remediation and restoration costs in excess of amounts accrued could have a material impact on the Businesss results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. It is the opinion of the Businesss management, however, that the possibility is remote that costs in excess of the range disclosed will have a material impact on the Businesss results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Inherent uncertainties exist in these estimates primarily due to unknown conditions, changing governmental regulations and legal standards regarding liability, and emerging remediation technologies for handling site remediation and restoration. The Business had accrued obligations of $33 million as of June 30, 2018 and $35 million at December 31, 2017 for probable environmental remediation and restoration costs.
Litigation
Bayer CropScience vs the Businesss ICC Arbitration
A summary of the Bayer CropScience v. Dow AgroSciences ICC Arbitration can be found in the Businesss financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.
On August 13, 2012, Bayer CropScience AG and Bayer CropScience NV (together, Bayer) filed a request for arbitration with the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) International Court of Arbitration against Dow AgroSciences LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Business, and other subsidiaries of the Business (collectively, DAS) under a 1992 license agreement executed by predecessors of the parties (the License Agreement). In its request for arbitration, Bayer alleged that (i) DAS breached the License Agreement, (ii) the License Agreement was properly terminated with no ongoing rights to DAS, (iii) DAS infringed its patent rights related to the use of the pat gene in certain soybean and cotton seed products, and (iv) Bayer was entitled to monetary damages and injunctive relief. DAS denied that it breached the License Agreement and asserted that the License Agreement remained in effect because it was not properly terminated. DAS also asserted that all of Bayers patents at issue are invalid and/or not infringed, and, therefore, for these reasons (and others), a license was not required.
A three-member arbitration tribunal presided over the arbitration proceeding (the tribunal). In a decision dated October 9, 2015, the tribunal determined that (i) DAS breached the License Agreement, (ii) Bayer properly terminated the License Agreement, (iii) all of the patents remaining in the proceeding are valid and infringed, and (iv) that Bayer is entitled to monetary damages in the amount of $455 million inclusive of pre-judgment interest and costs (the arbitral award). One of the arbitrators, however, issued a partial dissent finding that all of the patents are invalid based on the double-patenting doctrine. The tribunal also denied Bayers request for injunctive relief.
On March 1, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) affirmed the arbitral award. As a result of this action, in the first quarter of 2017, the Business recorded a loss of $469 million, inclusive of the arbitral award and post-judgment interest, which was included in Sundry income (expense) net in the consolidated statements of income. On May 26, 2017, the Business paid the $469 million arbitral award to Bayer as a result of that decision. On September 11, 2017, DAS filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court to review the case, but the Court denied DASs petition. The litigation is now concluded with no risk of further liability.
Other Litigation Matters
In addition to the Bayer matter, the Business is party to a number of other claims and lawsuits arising out of the normal course of business with respect to product liability, patent infringement, governmental regulation,
14
contract and commercial litigation, and other actions. Certain of these actions purport to be class actions and seek damages in very large amounts. All such claims are being contested. The Business participates in an active risk management program consisting of numerous insurance policies secured from many carriers at various times. These policies may provide coverage that could be utilized to minimize the financial impact, if any, of certain contingencies described above. It is the opinion of the Businesss management that the possibility is remote that the aggregate of all such other claims and lawsuits will have a material adverse impact on the results of operations, financial condition and cash flows of the Business.
The Business insured certain litigation matters through Dows insurance company. At June 30, 2018, litigation liability was $45 million and included in Accrued and other current liabilities and Other noncurrent obligations ($49 million included in Accrued and other current liabilities and Other noncurrent obligations at December 31, 2017). Insured litigation receivables were $37 million included in Accounts and notes receivable other ($40 million included in Accounts and notes receivable other at December 31, 2017).
Guarantees
The following table provides a summary of final expiration, maximum future payments and recorded liability reflected in the balance sheet for guarantees:
Guarantees | June 30, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions |
Final
Expiration |
Maximum
Future Payments |
Recorded
Liability |
Final
Expiration |
Maximum
Future Payments |
Recorded
Liability |
||||||||||||||||||
Guarantees |
2023 | $ | 139 | $ | 2 | 2023 | $ | 340 | $ | 5 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees arise during the ordinary course of business from relationships with customers and nonconsolidated affiliates when the Business undertakes an obligation to guarantee the performance of others (via delivery of cash or other assets) if specified triggering events occur. With guarantees, such as financial contracts, non-performance by the guaranteed party triggers the obligation of the Business to make payments to the beneficiary of the guarantee. The majority of the Businesss guarantees relates to debt of nonconsolidated affiliates, which have expiration dates ranging from less than one year to three years, and trade financing transactions in Latin America, which typically expire within one year of inception. The Businesss current expectation is that future payment or performance related to the non-performance of others is considered remote.
15
NOTE 11 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The following table provides an analysis of the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss In millions |
Cumulative
Translation Adj |
Pension
and Other Postretirement Benefits |
Accum Other
Comp Loss |
|||||||||
Balance at Jan 1, 2017 |
$ | (832 | ) | $ | (30 | ) | $ | (862 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications |
49 | | 49 | |||||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
| 3 | 3 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 49 | $ | 3 | $ | 52 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at June 30, 2017 |
$ | (783 | ) | $ | (27 | ) | $ | (810 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at Jan 1, 2018 |
$ | (763 | ) | $ | (34 | ) | $ | (797 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications |
(44 | ) | | (44 | ) | |||||||
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
| 1 | 1 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net other comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | (44 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | (43 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at June 30, 2018 |
$ | (807 | ) | $ | (33 | ) | $ | (840 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effects on the net activity related to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
Tax Benefit (Expense) In millions |
Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30,
2018 |
June 30,
2017 |
|||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
$ | | $ | (20 | ) | |||
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total benefit (expense) from income taxes related to other comprehensive income (loss) items |
$ | | $ | (20 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12 NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS
Ownership interests in the Businesss subsidiaries held by parties other than the Business are presented separately from the Business equity in the combined balance sheet as Noncontrolling interests. The amount of combined net income attributable to the Business and the noncontrolling interests are both presented on the face of the combined statements of income and comprehensive income.
16
The following table summarizes the activity for equity attributable to noncontrolling interests for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:
Noncontrolling Interests In millions |
Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30,
2018 |
June 30,
2017 |
|||||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | 41 | $ | 38 | ||||
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests |
11 | 21 | ||||||
Distributions to noncontrolling interests |
(23 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Other |
1 | | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 30 | $ | 48 | ||||
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13 PENSION PLANS AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
During the six months ended June 30, 2018, the Business recorded operating costs of $5 million and non-operating costs of $3 million related to its significant pension plans. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Business recorded operating costs of $4 million and a credit of $1 million to non-operating costs related to its significant pension plans.
On January 1, 2018, the Business adopted ASU 2017-07, which impacted the presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost in the consolidated statements of income. Net periodic benefit cost, other than the service cost component, is retrospectively included in Sundry income (expense) net in the consolidated statements of income.
NOTE 14 STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Businesss employees participate in Dows stock-based compensation programs and their awards are based on DowDuPont stock and Dow metrics. Compensation expense of $7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2018 and $15 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017 related to these programs is included in Cost of sales, Research and development expenses, and Selling, general and administrative expenses, as applicable, based on the Businesss employees who participated in the programs.
NOTE 15 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
As part of the Synergy Program, the Business has or will shut down a number of manufacturing, research and development (R&D) and corporate facilities around the world. In the first six months of 2018, manufacturing facilities and related assets and R&D facilities associated with this plan were written down to zero. The impairment charges related to the Synergy Program, totaling $57 million, were included in Restructuring and asset related charges (credits) net in the consolidated statements of income. See Note 5 for additional information on the Businesss restructuring activities.
NOTE 16 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
A summary of the Businesss variable interest entities (VIE) can be found in the Businesss financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Assets and Liabilities of Consolidated VIE
The Businesss combined financial statements include the assets, liabilities and results of operations of VIE for which the Business is the primary beneficiary. The other equity holders interests are reflected in Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests in the combined statements of income and comprehensive income and Noncontrolling interests in the combined balance sheet.
17
The following table summarizes the carrying amounts of these entities assets and liabilities included in the Businesss combined balance sheet at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
Assets and Liabilities of Consolidated VIEs In millions |
June 30,
2018 |
Dec 31,
2017 |
||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 4 | $ | 3 | ||||
Other current assets |
3 | 2 | ||||||
Net property |
20 | 23 | ||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
1 | 1 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets 1 |
$ | 28 | $ | 29 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Current liabilities |
$ | 3 | $ | 3 | ||||
Long-term debt |
12 | 15 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities 2 |
$ | 15 | $ | 18 | ||||
|
|
|
|
1. |
All assets were restricted at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. |
2. |
All liabilities were nonrecourse at June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017. |
NOTE 17 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the six months ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, the Business purchased products used in production from Dow in the amount of $69 million and $60 million respectively.
Effective with the Merger, the Business reports transactions with DuPont and its affiliates as related party transaction. Transactions with DuPont and its affiliates in the period from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2018 were $45 million.
NOTE 18 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Other than those described in the notes to the financial statements, no events have occurred after June 30, 2018, but before October 17, 2018, the date the financial statements were available to be issued, that require consideration as adjustments to, or disclosures in, the financial statements.
18