PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF MEDNAX’S DIRECTORS

MEDNAX’s Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended (our “Articles of Incorporation”), and Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that the number of Directors constituting MEDNAX’s Board of Directors will be determined from time to time by resolution adopted by MEDNAX’s Board of Directors. Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the nominees for Director to be elected at the annual meeting in 2019 by the holders of our common stock are as follows:

Carlos A. Migoya was initially identified as a potential nominee by a current non-management Director and recommended for nomination by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Michael A. Rucker was initially identified as a potential nominee by one of the Company’s shareholders and recommended for nomination by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.

Please see below under “Directors and Executive Officers” for the biographies of these nominees for Director.

Each Director elected will serve for a term expiring at MEDNAX’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which is expected to be held in May 2020, or until his or her successor has been duly elected and qualified.

MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee will refuse to act or be unable to accept election; however, in the event that a nominee for a directorship is unable to accept election or if any other unforeseen contingencies should arise, proxies will be voted for the remaining nominees and for such other person as may be designated by MEDNAX’s Board of Directors, unless the proxies provide otherwise.

If a quorum is present at the annual meeting, the 11 nominees receiving the highest number of votes “FOR” election will be elected to the Board of Directors of MEDNAX, subject to the majority voting policy described above. Proxies will be voted “FOR” all such nominees absent contrary instructions.

MEDNAX’s Board of Directors recommends a vote “FOR” the election of each of the 11 nominees for Director.

5

GOVERNANCE AND RELATED MATTERS

Our business, property and affairs are managed under the direction of our Board of Directors, except with respect to those matters reserved for our shareholders. Our Board of Directors establishes our overall corporate policies, reviews the performance of our senior management in executing our business strategy and managing our day-to-day operations and acts as an advisor to our senior management. Our Board of Directors’ mission is to further the long-term interests of our shareholders. Members of the Board of Directors are kept informed of MEDNAX’s business through discussions with MEDNAX’s management, primarily at meetings of the Board of Directors and its committees, and through reports and analyses presented to them. Significant communications between our Directors and senior management occur apart from such meetings.

Questions and Answers About Our Corporate Governance Practices

What Committees Have Our Board of Directors Established?

The standing committees of MEDNAX’s Board of Directors are the Executive Committee, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Medical Science and Technology Committee. Copies of the charters for these committees, as well as our corporate governance principles, are available on our website at www.mednax.com . Our website and the information contained therein, other than material expressly referred to in this Proxy Statement, or connected thereto, are not incorporated into this Proxy Statement. A copy of our committee charters and corporate governance principles are also available upon request from MEDNAX’s Secretary at 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, Florida 33323.

How Many Times Did Our Board of Directors Meet During 2018?

During 2018, MEDNAX’s Board of Directors held 13 meetings. Committees of the Board of Directors held a combined total of 24 meetings and also took various actions by unanimous written consent. Each Director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of MEDNAX’s Board of Directors and its committees held during 2018 during the period he or she was a member thereof. Although MEDNAX has no formal policy with respect to its Directors’ attendance at MEDNAX’s Annual Shareholders’ Meetings, in 2018 all of our Directors attended the Annual Shareholders’ Meeting, with one exception.

Are a Majority of Our Directors Independent?

Our Board of Directors has reviewed information about each of our non-employee Directors and made the determination that all of the non-employee Directors on our Board of Directors are independent, and that Messrs. Migoya and Rucker, if elected, would be independent. In arriving at this conclusion, our Board of Directors made the affirmative determination that each of Drs. Carlo, Goldschmidt and Sosa, Ms. Barker and Messrs. Alvarez, Fernandez, Gabos, Kadre, Migoya and Rucker meet the Board of Directors’ previously adopted categorical standards for determining independence in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance rules. In making this determination, the Board of Directors considered transactions and relationships between each Director or any member of his or her immediate family and MEDNAX and its subsidiaries and affiliates. These transactions consisted of those transactions reported below under “Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions — Transactions with Related Persons.” Our Board of Directors determined that each of these transactions and relationships was within the New York Stock Exchange standards and our categorical standards and that none of the transactions or relationships affected the independence of the Director involved. Our adopted categorical standards for determining independence in accordance with the New York Stock Exchange’s corporate governance rules are contained in our corporate governance principles, a copy of which is available on our website at www.mednax.com .

6

Who Are the “Chairman of the Board” and “Lead Independent Director”?

To assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its obligations, following each annual meeting of shareholders, MEDNAX’s Board of Directors designates a non-management Director as “Chairman of the Board.” In addition, the Board of Directors, by a majority vote of the non-management Directors, may also designate a non-management Director as “Lead Independent Director.”

MEDNAX separates the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board in recognition of the differences between the two roles. The Chief Executive Officer is responsible for determining the long-term strategic direction for the Company. The principal responsibility of the Chairman of the Board is to serve as chief administrative liaison between independent Directors and MEDNAX management and to monitor implementation of Board of Directors’ directives and actions. The principal responsibility of the Lead Independent Director, if designated, is to work collaboratively with the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer with respect to Board of Directors governance and process. The Lead Independent Director has additional responsibilities and authorities set out in our corporate governance principles.

At least once a year, the Chairman of the Board or Lead Independent Director also presides over meetings of our independent Directors. Following our 2018 annual meeting of shareholders, our Board of Directors appointed Mr. Alvarez to serve as Chairman of the Board and Mr. Kadre to serve as Lead Independent Director.

What Role Does the Board of Directors Serve in Risk Oversight for the Company?

The Board of Directors provides oversight of the Company’s risk exposure by receiving periodic reports from senior management regarding matters relating to financial, operational, regulatory, legal and strategic risks and mitigation strategies for such risks. In addition, as reflected in the Audit Committee Charter, the Board of Directors has delegated to the Audit Committee responsibility to oversee, discuss and evaluate the Company’s policies and guidelines with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including internal control over financial reporting. As appropriate, the Audit Committee provides reports to and receives direction from the full Board of Directors regarding the Company’s risk management policies and guidelines, as well as the Audit Committee’s risk oversight activities.

How Can Shareholders Communicate with the Board of Directors?

Anyone who has a concern about MEDNAX’s conduct, including accounting, internal controls or audit matters, may communicate directly with our Chairman of the Board of Directors, Lead Independent Director, our non-management Directors, the Chairman of the Audit Committee or the Audit Committee. Such communications may be confidential or anonymous, and may be submitted in writing to the Chief Compliance Officer, MEDNAX, Inc., 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, Florida 33323, or reported by phone at 877-835-5764. Any such concerns will be forwarded to the appropriate Directors for their review, and will be simultaneously reviewed and addressed by the Company’s General Counsel or Chief Compliance Officer in the same way that other concerns are addressed by us. MEDNAX’s Code of Conduct, which is discussed below, prohibits any employee from retaliating or taking any adverse action against anyone for raising or helping to resolve an integrity concern.

Has MEDNAX Adopted a Code of Conduct?

MEDNAX has adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to all Directors, officers, employees and independent contractors of MEDNAX and its affiliated professionals. MEDNAX intends to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the Code of Conduct that applies to any of MEDNAX’s executive officers or Directors by posting such information on its website at www.mednax.com .

MEDNAX has also adopted a Code of Professional Conduct — Finance that applies to all employees with access to, and responsibility for, matters of finance and financial management, including MEDNAX’s Chief

7

Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer. MEDNAX intends to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the Code of Professional Conduct — Finance that applies to any of MEDNAX’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer or persons performing similar functions by posting such information on its website at www.mednax.com .

Copies of our Code of Conduct and the Code of Professional Conduct — Finance are available on our website at www.mednax.com and upon request from MEDNAX’s Secretary at 1301 Concord Terrace, Sunrise, Florida 33323.

Has MEDNAX Adopted a Clawback Policy?

MEDNAX has adopted a Clawback Policy that permits the Company to seek to recover certain amounts of incentive compensation, including both cash and equity, paid to any executive officer (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) on or after January 1, 2014, if payment of such compensation was based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement of its financial statements due to misconduct, and if the executive engaged in improper conduct that materially contributed to the need for restatement, and a lower amount of incentive compensation would have been earned based on the restated financial results.

Does MEDNAX Require its Executive Officers and Board of Directors to Retain a Certain Amount of MEDNAX Common Stock?

MEDNAX has adopted a Stock Ownership and Retention Policy which requires that each named executive officer and each non-management Director retain MEDNAX common stock worth a certain multiple of annual base salary, or cash retainer, respectively. Details of the policy and the required ownership levels are described in further detail in the “Executive Compensation: Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of this Proxy Statement.

Has MEDNAX Adopted an Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy?

MEDNAX has adopted a policy prohibiting its directors, management, financial and other insiders from engaging in transactions in MEDNAX securities or derivatives of MEDNAX securities that might be considered hedging, or from holding MEDNAX securities in margin accounts or pledging MEDNAX securities as collateral for a loan, unless such person clearly demonstrates the financial capacity to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities.

Does MEDNAX Have a Director Retirement Age Policy?

MEDNAX has adopted a Director Retirement Age Policy which provides that a Director must retire and may not stand for re-election during the calendar year in which he or she attains age 80. Additionally, no Director may be nominated to a new term if he or she would attain age 80 by the end of the calendar year in which the election is held.

Our primary function is to assist the Board of Directors in their evaluation and oversight of the integrity of MEDNAX’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting, the qualifications and independence of MEDNAX’s independent auditors and the performance of MEDNAX’s audit functions. In addition, while we are also responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in their evaluation and oversight of MEDNAX’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations, it is not our duty to assure compliance with such laws and regulations or MEDNAX’s Compliance Plan and related policies. We are also responsible for overseeing, discussing and evaluating MEDNAX’s guidelines, policies and processes with respect to risk assessment and risk management and the steps management has taken to monitor and control risk exposure, and we advise the Board of Directors with respect to such matters, as appropriate.

We also oversee MEDNAX’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes generally. Management is responsible for MEDNAX’s financial statements and the financial reporting process, including the system of internal controls. We also review the preparation by management of MEDNAX’s quarterly and annual financial statements. MEDNAX’s independent auditors, who are accountable to us, are responsible for expressing an opinion as to whether the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of MEDNAX in conformity with GAAP. MEDNAX’s independent auditors are also responsible for auditing and reporting on the effective operation of MEDNAX’s internal control over financial reporting. We are responsible for retaining MEDNAX’s independent auditors and maintain sole responsibility for their compensation, oversight and termination. We are also responsible for pre-approving all non-audit services to be provided by the independent auditors, and on an annual basis discussing with the independent auditors all significant relationships they have with MEDNAX to determine their independence.

In fulfilling our oversight role, we met and held discussions with MEDNAX’s management and independent auditors. Management advised us that MEDNAX’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP, and we reviewed and discussed the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. In addition, we reviewed and discussed the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section of MEDNAX’s periodic reports, key accounting and reporting issues and the scope, adequacy and assessments of MEDNAX’s internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures with management and MEDNAX’s independent auditors. We discussed privately with the independent auditors matters deemed significant by the independent auditors, including those matters required to be discussed pursuant to U.S. Auditing Standard No. 16 (Communications with Audit Committees), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

The independent auditors also provided us with the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and we discussed with the independent auditors matters relating to their independence. We also reviewed a report by the independent auditors describing the firm’s internal quality-control procedures and any material issues raised in the most recent internal-quality control review or external peer review or inspection performed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

Based on our review with management and the independent auditors of MEDNAX’s audited consolidated financial statements and internal controls over financial reporting and the independent auditors’ report on such financial statements and their evaluation of MEDNAX’s internal controls over financial reporting, and based on the discussions and written disclosures described above and our business judgment, we recommended to the Board of Directors that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 be included in MEDNAX’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, for filing with the SEC.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

Paul G. Gabos

Karey D. Barker

Manuel Kadre

Enrique J. Sosa, Ph.D.

9

Roger J. Medel, M.D., has been a Director of the Company since he co-founded it in 1979. Dr. Medel served as the Company’s President until May 2000 and as Chief Executive Officer until December 2002. In March 2003, Dr. Medel reassumed the position of President, serving in that position until May 2004, and Chief Executive Officer, a position in which he continues to serve today. Dr. Medel has served as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. since January 2016. Dr. Medel was a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami from January 2004 to February 2012. Dr. Medel participates as a member of several medical and professional organizations and, from June 2006 to April 2009, served on the Board of Directors of MBF Healthcare Acquisition Corp. The Board of Directors has concluded that Dr. Medel’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience as our Chief Executive Officer and founder of the Company and a physician with training and experience in the Company’s historical base service line of neonatology.

Cesar L. Alvarez has been a Director since March 1997 and was elected as Chairman of the Board of Directors in May 2004. Mr. Alvarez is a Senior Chairman of the international law firm of Greenberg Traurig. He previously served as the firm’s Executive Chairman for more than three years and as its Chief Executive Officer for 13 years. Mr. Alvarez also serves on the Board of Directors of Fairholme Funds, Inc., Intrexon Corporation, St. Joe Company and Watsco, Inc. Mr. Alvarez served on the Board of Directors of Sears Holdings Corporation from January 2013 until May 2017. The Board of Directors has concluded that Mr. Alvarez’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his management experience as the current Senior Chairman and as former Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of one of the nation’s largest law firms with professionals providing services in multiple locations across the country and abroad as well as his many years of corporate governance experience, both counseling and serving on the Boards of Directors of publicly traded and private companies.

10

Manuel Kadre was elected as a Director in May 2007 and designated as Lead Independent Director in March 2014. Since December 2012, Mr. Kadre has been the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MBB Auto, LLC and also serves as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of many other luxury automobile dealerships in the Northeast. Mr. Kadre is a partner and director of Gold Coast Restaurants, which is the largest franchisee of TGI Friday’s in the United States. From July 2009 until 2013, Mr. Kadre was the Chief Executive Officer of Gold Coast Caribbean Importers, LLC. Mr. Kadre has served on the Board of Directors of Republic Services, Inc. since June 2014 and was appointed as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Republic Services, Inc. in February 2017. Mr. Kadre has also served on the Board of Directors for Home Depot since October 2018. Mr. Kadre also serves on the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami and on the Board of Governors of University of Miami Hospital. The Board of Directors has concluded that Mr. Kadre’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience in acquiring and managing businesses, including those in regulated industries and in government relations, his financial expertise as well as his experience as a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami.

Karey D. Barker was elected as a Director in May 2015. Ms. Barker founded Cross Creek Advisors, LLC in 2013 and has served as its Managing Director since that time. Ms. Barker previously served as Managing Director, Venture of Wasatch Advisors, Inc. from 2006 until 2012 and served as a member of its Board of Directors from 1995 until 2012. Ms. Barker also serves as a board observer for several investment companies on behalf of Cross Creek Advisors. The Board of Directors has concluded that Ms. Barker’s qualifications to serve on the Board include her financial expertise and experience in managing venture capital and private equity funds.

Waldemar A. Carlo, M.D., was elected as a Director in June 1999. Dr. Carlo has served as Professor of Pediatrics and Director of the Division of Neonatology at the University of Alabama School of Medicine since 1991. Dr. Carlo participates as a member of several medical and professional organizations. He has received numerous research awards and grants and has lectured extensively, both nationally and internationally. Additionally, Dr. Carlo is a recipient of the Apgar Award, the highest recognition given to neonatologists by the American Academy of Pediatrics. The Board of Directors has concluded that Dr. Carlo’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience as a nationally known Professor of Neonatology leading one of the nation’s largest academic neonatal practices as well as his experience performing scientific research and developing and implementing educational programs for physicians.

Michael B. Fernandez was elected as a Director in October 1995. Mr. Fernandez has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MBF Healthcare Partners, L.P., a private equity firm focused on investing in healthcare service companies, since February 2005. He also served as the Chairman of Simply Healthcare Holdings until its acquisition by Anthem, Inc. in February 2015, and Navarro Discount Pharmacies, LLC until its acquisition by CVS Caremark in September 2014. Mr. Fernandez has served as a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami and was on the Board of Directors of various private entities, including Healthcare Atlantic, Inc., a holding company that operates various healthcare entities. The Board of Directors has concluded that Mr. Fernandez’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience over many years as a founder, investor and executive in a variety of successful healthcare businesses (including managed care companies), his financial and marketing expertise, as well as his experience as a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Miami.

Paul G. Gabos was elected as a Director in November 2002. Mr. Gabos, who is presently retired, served as Chief Financial Officer of Lincare Holdings Inc. (“Lincare”) from June 1997 until December 2012, after its merger with a subsidiary of Linde AG, and prior thereto served as Vice President — Administration for Lincare. Prior to joining Lincare in 1993, Mr. Gabos worked for Coopers & Lybrand and for Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. Mr. Gabos currently serves on the Board of Directors of Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. The Board of Directors has concluded that Mr. Gabos’ qualifications to serve on the Board include his management experience as a senior executive and financial expertise as Chief Financial Officer of a publicly traded healthcare services company and prior thereto as an investment banker with a large national firm.

11

Pascal J. Goldschmidt, M.D. , was elected as a Director in March 2006. Dr. Goldschmidt currently serves as a Director and President and Chief Executive Officer of American Healthcare System, Ltd. Dr. Goldschmidt previously served as a Director and Chief Executive Officer of European Care Global QHCI, Ltd., and prior thereto as the Director of Strategic International Projects and Dean Emeritus at the University of Miami. Dr. Goldschmidt served as the Senior Vice President for Medical Affairs and Dean of the University of Miami Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine from April 2006 until May 2016. Dr. Goldschmidt also served as the Chief Executive Officer of the University of Miami Health System from November 2007 until January 2016. Previously, Dr. Goldschmidt was a faculty member with the Department of Medicine at Duke University Medical Center where he served as Chairman from 2003 to 2006 and as Chief of the Division of Cardiology from 2000 to 2003. Dr. Goldschmidt served on the Board of Directors of Health Management Associates from June 2011 until August 2013 and previously served as a director for Opko Health, Inc. from 2007 until 2011. The Board of Directors has concluded that Dr. Goldschmidt’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience as a Chief Executive Officer of a healthcare and hospital system, as Dean of a premier medical school managing physicians and other healthcare professionals, as a physician trained in cardiology, as well as his experience performing scientific research and developing and implementing educational programs for physicians.

Carlos A. Migoya has been nominated for election by our Board of Directors and has agreed to stand for election to the Board. Since 2011, Mr. Migoya has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Jackson Health System, the public health system for Miami-Dade County, which includes Jackson Memorial Hospital, Jackson South Medical Center, Jackson North Medical Center, Holtz Children’s Hospital, Jackson Rehabilitation Hospital, Jackson Behavioral Health Hospital, urgent care centers, multiple primary care and specialty care centers, two long-term care nursing facilities and a team of corrections health services clinics, and generated over $1.8 billion in revenue in 2016. Mr. Migoya led the transformation of Jackson Health System from a large budget deficit in the year before his tenure, to budget surpluses in each subsequent year. Prior to joining Jackson Health System, Mr. Migoya served as City Manager for the City of Miami from 2010 to 2011, a position he held in a pro bono capacity, while eliminating a $115 million budget deficit. Prior to serving as City Manager, Mr. Migoya worked for Wells Fargo & Company and its predecessors, including Wachovia Corporation and First Union Corporation, for more than 25 years, retiring as Regional President, North Carolina and Chief Executive Officer, Atlantic Region. Mr. Migoya served as a member of the board of directors of AutoNation, Inc. from 2006-2015. The Board of Directors has concluded that Mr. Migoya’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his experience leading a large hospital system, particularly during a turnaround period for the system, as well as his career in financial services and his experience with large government organizations.

Michael A. Rucker has been nominated for election by our Board of Directors and has agreed to stand for election to the Board. Since 2017, Mr. Rucker has served as Chief Executive Officer, and since 2016 as a member of the Board of Directors, of Ivy Rehab Network, Inc., one of the largest networks of physical therapy clinics in the United States. Prior to joining Ivy Rehab, Mr. Rucker served from 2010 to 2017 as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Surgical Care Affiliates, Inc., at the time a publicly traded operator of one of the nation’s largest networks of surgical facilities, until its acquisition by UnitedHealth Group. Mr. Rucker has also held executive roles in various healthcare companies, including DaVita, Inc., where he served as Division Vice President from 2005 to 2008 after DaVita acquired Gambro Healthcare, where Mr. Rucker had served in various general management and business development capacities since 1997. The Board of Directors has concluded that Mr. Rucker’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his extensive experience as an executive in the healthcare industry, including the management of physician practices and partnerships.

Enrique J. Sosa, Ph.D. , was elected as a Director in May 2004. Dr. Sosa, who is presently retired, served as President of BP Amoco Chemicals from January 1999 to April 1999. From 1995 to 1998, he was Executive Vice President of Amoco Corporation. Prior to joining Amoco, Dr. Sosa served as Senior Vice President of The Dow Chemical Company, President of Dow North America and a member of its Board of Directors. Dr. Sosa was a director of FMC Corporation from June 1999 until April 2012 and a director of Northern Trust Corporation from April 2007 until April 2012. The Board of Directors has concluded that Dr. Sosa’s qualifications to serve on the Board include his management and financial expertise as a former executive officer of large international

12

industrial businesses, his many years of experience with corporate governance, and his service on the Boards of Directors of other publicly traded companies.

Joseph M. Calabro joined the Company in January 1996 and has served as President since May 2004. Mr. Calabro previously also served as our Chief Operating Officer from May 2000 to February 2019, our Executive Vice President, Management from January 2000 to May 2000 and our Chief Information Officer from January 1996 to January 2000. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Calabro served as Director of Information Technology for the Ambulatory Surgery Group of Columbia/HCA. He served in various operational and technology positions for various healthcare companies from 1987 to 1994.

Stephen D. Farber joined the Company in August 2018 as Executive Vice President and was appointed Chief Financial Officer in November 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Farber served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kindred Healthcare, Inc. from February 2014 until its sale in July 2018. From May 2013 to December 2013, Mr. Farber served as Executive Vice President, Chief Restructuring Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Rural/Metro Corporation. Prior to joining Rural/Metro Corporation, Mr. Farber’s principal roles included serving from 2011 to 2012 as Executive-in-Residence with Warburg Pincus LLC, a global private equity firm, from 2006 to 2009 as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Connance, Inc., a predictive analytics provider to healthcare companies, and from 2002 to 2005 as Chief Financial Officer of Tenet Healthcare Corporation.

David A. Clark joined the Company in May 2001 and was appointed Chief Operating Officer in February 2019. Prior to his appointment as our Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Clark had served as President of our MEDNAX National Medical Group since January 2017. Mr. Clark previously served as President of our Western Division from June 2015 to January 2017 and as Chief Operating Officer of our Pediatrix Division from August 2008 until April 2015, with executive officer responsibilities beginning January 1, 2009. Mr. Clark served as Senior Vice President, Operations from December 2003 until August 2008, and as Vice President of Operations, South Central Region from November 2001 to November 2003. From June 2000 to October 2001, Mr. Clark was Vice President of Operations for Magella Healthcare, which we acquired in 2001, and prior thereto he was Vice President of Business Development for Magella Healthcare. Mr. Clark is a certified public accountant.

Dominic J. Andreano joined the Company in September 2001 and was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in May 2012. Prior to his appointment, Mr. Andreano previously served as Deputy General Counsel for the Company from January 2009 until May 2012, as Associate General Counsel for the Company from January 2004 until December 2008, and prior thereto as Director, Business Development. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Andreano was an associate in the corporate securities department of Holland & Knight, LLP in Miami from June 2000 until September 2001, and an associate in the healthcare corporate department of Greenberg Traurig, P.A. in Miami from September 1997 until June 2000.

John C. Pepia joined the Company in February 2002 and served as Vice President, Accounting and Finance until May 2016, at which time Mr. Pepia was appointed Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. The Board of Directors appointed Mr. Pepia Principal Accounting Officer in August 2016. Prior to joining the Company, from 1996 to 2002, Mr. Pepia held several Vice President of Accounting & Finance positions at ANC Rental Corporation. He served in various financial positions in several public and private companies from 1985 to 1996.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Audit Committee

MEDNAX’s Audit Committee held seven meetings in 2018. Messrs. Gabos and Kadre, Dr. Sosa and Ms. Barker were members of the committee throughout 2018. Mr. Gabos acted as chair of the committee throughout 2018. MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Gabos and Kadre, Dr. Sosa and Ms. Barker qualify as “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the rules and regulations of

13

the SEC and that each of Messrs. Gabos and Kadre, and Dr. Sosa and Ms. Barker meet the independence requirements under such rules and regulations and for a New York Stock Exchange listed company.

MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Audit Committee setting out the functions that it is to perform. A copy of the Audit Committee Charter is available on our website at www.mednax.com .

Please refer to the Report of the Audit Committee, which is set forth above, for a further description of our Audit Committee’s responsibilities and its recommendation with respect to our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Compensation Committee

MEDNAX’s Compensation Committee held six meetings in 2018, and took various other actions via unanimous written consent. Messrs. Kadre and Fernandez and Dr. Carlo were members of the committee throughout 2018. Mr. Kadre acted as chair of the committee throughout 2018. MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has determined that each of Messrs. Kadre and Fernandez and Dr. Carlo meet the independence requirements for a New York Stock Exchange listed company.

MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Compensation Committee setting out the functions that it is to perform. A copy of the Compensation Committee Charter is available on our website at www.mednax.com .

The primary purpose of MEDNAX’s Compensation Committee is to assist MEDNAX’s Board of Directors in the discharge of the Board of Directors’ responsibilities relating to compensation of executive officers. The scope of authority of MEDNAX’s Compensation Committee includes the following:

Upon a determination of MEDNAX’s full Compensation Committee membership, matters may be delegated to a subcommittee for evaluation and recommendation back to the full committee. For a description of the role performed by executive officers and compensation consultants in determining or recommending the amount or form of executive and Director compensation, see “Executive Compensation: Compensation Discussion and Analysis — How Pay Decisions are Made.”

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

MEDNAX’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held five meetings in 2018, and took various other actions via unanimous written consent. Drs. Carlo and Sosa and Mr. Fernandez were members of the committee throughout 2018. Dr. Carlo served as chair of the committee throughout 2018. MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has determined that each of Drs. Carlo and Sosa and Mr. Fernandez meet the independence requirements for a New York Stock Exchange listed company.

14

MEDNAX’s Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee setting out the functions that it is to perform. A copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter is available on our website at www.mednax.com .

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board of Directors with respect to nominating new Directors and committee members and taking a leadership role in shaping the corporate governance of MEDNAX. To fulfill its responsibilities and duties, the committee, among other things, reviews the qualifications and independence of existing Directors and new candidates; assesses the contributions of current Directors; identifies and recommends individuals qualified to be appointed to committees of the Board of Directors; considers rotation of committee members; reviews the charters of the committees and makes recommendations to the full Board of Directors with respect thereto; develops and recommends to the Board of Directors corporate governance principles, including a code of business conduct; and evaluates and recommends succession plans for MEDNAX’s Chief Executive Officer and other senior executives.

Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not solicit director nominations, the committee will consider candidates suggested by shareholders in written submissions to MEDNAX’s Secretary in accordance with the procedures described below in the section entitled “Information Concerning Shareholder Proposals.” In evaluating nominees for Director, the committee does not differentiate between nominees recommended by shareholders and others. In identifying and evaluating candidates to be nominated for Director, the committee reviews the desired experience, mix of skills and other qualities required for appropriate Board composition, taking into account the current Board members and the specific needs of MEDNAX and its Board of Directors. Although the committee does not have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of diversity in identifying Director nominees, the committee’s review process is designed so that the Board of Directors includes members with diverse backgrounds, skills and experience, and represents appropriate financial, clinical and other expertise relevant to the business of MEDNAX. At a minimum, Director candidates must meet the following qualifications: high personal and professional ethics, integrity and values and a commitment to the representation of the long-term interests of our shareholders. In 2018, following the resignation of Rep. Donna Shalala from our Board of Directors, the committee engaged the executive search firm of Spencer Stuart to identify and evaluate potential Director candidates in advance of our 2019 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting. The committee met extensively with Spencer Stuart and reviewed candidates presented to the committee by Spencer Stuart, along with candidates presented to the committee by certain of our shareholders and candidates identified to the committee by current Board members. All candidates so presented or identified became part of the committee’s formal process with Spencer Stuart. The committee narrowed the initial list of 40 widely diverse candidates to 10 people, consisting evenly of women and men. The committee, as well as the Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director of the Board, then evaluated and interviewed a subset of the remaining candidates. Following these interviews, Messrs. Migoya and Rucker accepted the Company’s offer to be nominated to the Board of Directors and the committee thereafter recommended to the Board that Messrs. Migoya and Rucker be nominated for election to the Board at our 2019 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting.

Risk Considerations in Our Compensation Programs

The Company has reviewed its compensation structures and policies as they pertain to risk and has determined that its compensation programs do not create or encourage the taking of risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

MEDNAX Director or Director nominee, executive officer or holder of more than 5% of the outstanding voting stock of MEDNAX or any of their respective immediate family members. The policy does not apply to transactions pertaining to (i) director or officer compensation that is approved or recommended to MEDNAX’s Board of Directors for approval by MEDNAX’s Compensation Committee or (ii) the employment by MEDNAX of any immediate family member of a related person in a non-officer position and at compensation levels commensurate with that paid to other similarly situated employees.

Pursuant to the terms of the policy, all covered transactions, if determined to be material by MEDNAX’s General Counsel or if the transaction involves the participation of a member of the MEDNAX Board of Directors, are required to be promptly referred to the disinterested members of the MEDNAX Audit Committee for their review or, if less than a majority of the members of MEDNAX Audit Committee are disinterested, to all the disinterested members of the MEDNAX Board of Directors. Pursuant to the terms of the policy, materiality determinations must be based on the significance of the information to investors in light of all circumstances, including, but not limited to, the (i) relationship of the related persons to the covered transaction, and with each other, (ii) importance to the person having the interest, and (iii) amount involved in the transaction. All transactions involving in excess of $120,000 are automatically deemed to be material pursuant to the terms of the policy.

The disinterested Directors of MEDNAX’s Audit Committee or Board of Directors, as applicable, are required to review such material covered transactions at their next regularly-scheduled meeting, or earlier if a special meeting is called by the Chairman of the Audit Committee and may only approve such a material covered transaction if it has been entered into in good faith and on fair and reasonable terms that are no less favorable to MEDNAX than those that would be available to MEDNAX in a comparable transaction in arm’s length dealings with an unrelated third party at the time it is considered by the disinterested Directors of MEDNAX’s Audit Committee or Board of Directors, as applicable.

All of the transactions described in “Transactions with Related Persons” below were covered transactions under our policy and the policies and procedures required by the policy were followed in connection with the review and approval or ratification of all of such transactions.

Transactions with Related Persons

Mr. Alvarez has served on MEDNAX’s Board of Directors since March 1997. Mr. Alvarez is the Senior Chairman of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., which serves as one of MEDNAX’s outside counsels and receives customary fees for legal services. In 2018, MEDNAX paid Greenberg Traurig, P.A. approximately $1,380,000 for such services and currently anticipates that this relationship will continue. Mr. Alvarez does not personally provide legal services to MEDNAX and derives no direct personal benefit from MEDNAX’s payment for legal services to Greenberg Traurig, P.A. Further, the fees derived from MEDNAX represent an immaterial portion of the overall revenue generated by Greenberg Traurig, P.A.

17

SECTION II: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2018 Business Highlights

Stability and building long-term value are at the core of everything we do. We are a leading provider of physician services with a wide national network of affiliated physicians who specialize in fields such as newborn and maternal care, anesthesia, radiology and pediatric specialty care, among others. Our unique healthcare model has been in place for almost 40 years, allowing us to focus on what is most important in our industry — taking great care of our patients and improving patient outcomes. In 2018, we continued to position ourselves for the future of healthcare by concentrating on our long-term growth strategy. We remained disciplined in our spending, highly-selective in our acquisitions and responsive to the changing healthcare landscape. We continued to be challenged in 2018 by changes in payor mix, reduced patient volumes and increased pressures on clinical compensation. In response to these challenges, we developed a number of strategic initiatives across our organization, in both our shared services functions and our operational infrastructure, with a goal of generating improvements in our general and administrative expenses and our operational infrastructure. In our shared services departments, we are focused on improving processes, using our resources more efficiently and utilizing our scale more effectively to improve cost and service performance across our operations. Within our operational infrastructure, we have developed specific operational plans within each of our service lines and affiliated physician practices, with specific milestones and regular reporting, with the goal of generating long-term operational improvements and fostering even greater collaboration across our national medical group. We achieved the goal we established for these initiatives of $60 million in improvements in 2018. We believe these strategic initiatives, together with our continued plans to invest in focused, targeted and strategic organic and acquisitive growth, position us well to deliver a differentiated value proposition to our stakeholders while continuing to provide the highest quality care for our patients. Key financial results for the last three fiscal years, including the impact of the challenges we faced in 2018, are highlighted below:

Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is a non-GAAP financial measure. For a description of the rationale for our presentation of EBITDA and a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure, for the years ended December  31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, please see the disclosure under the caption “Non-GAAP Measures” beginning on page 56 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 14, 2019.

18

Our proven track record is also validated by the growth of our diluted earnings per share and annual cash flow from operations over the last 10 years.

Note: All share and per share amounts for all periods presented and discussed in this Proxy Statement reflect the two-for-one stock split effected in 2013.

19

20

The CEO Realized Pay at a Glance chart above reflects the value of restricted stock awards and performance share awards previously awarded that vested during the year, calculated based on the number of shares acquired at vesting multiplied by the closing price of a share of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the vesting dates.

Despite the Company’s continued growth, since 2011, Dr. Medel’s base salary has been $1,000,000 and his target bonus opportunity has remained 150% of base salary. His average bonus paid over the last ten years has been approximately 135% of base salary or 91% of target. Dr. Medel’s bonus exceeded 170% of base salary in only two out of those 10 years. The updated market analysis conducted during 2018 found that the median peer target bonus for chief executive officers was 128% of base salary. That same analysis found that over the 2011-2017 period, the actual peer CEO bonus was 128% of base salary at the median and 170% of base salary at the 75 ^th percentile.

21

SECTION III: OVERVIEW OF THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The Guiding Principles of Our Pay Philosophy

The Compensation Committee has designed our executive compensation program with the following guiding principles in mind:

Pay Mix

The charts below show that most of our NEOs’ total direct compensation is variable (90% for the CEO and an average of 86% for our other NEOs) based upon actual 2018 compensation:

22

How Pay Decisions Are Made

The Compensation Committee, composed solely of independent Directors, is responsible for making pay decisions for the NEOs. The Compensation Committee works very closely with its independent consultant, which for 2018 was Willis Towers Watson & Co. (“Willis Towers Watson”), and management to examine pay and performance matters throughout the year. The Compensation Committee held six meetings over the course of 2018, and took various other actions via unanimous written consent. The Compensation Committee’s written charter can be accessed on the MEDNAX website at www.mednax.com .

The Role of the Compensation Committee and Management

The primary role of the Compensation Committee is to assist MEDNAX’s Board of Directors in the discharge of the Board’s responsibilities related to executive compensation matters. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities include:

The CEO does not play any role in the Compensation Committee’s determination of his own pay; however, the Compensation Committee solicits input from the CEO concerning the performance and compensation of the other NEOs. The CEO bases his recommendations on his assessment of each individual’s performance, tenure and experience in the role, external market pay practices, retention risk and MEDNAX’s overall pay philosophy.

The Role of Independent Consultants

The Compensation Committee continually reviews executive compensation to ensure that it reflects our pay philosophy and, as necessary, retains the services of an independent consultant to assist in such review. During 2018, the Compensation Committee retained Willis Towers Watson to provide data and analysis with respect to the compensation paid to our NEOs. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Willis Towers Watson pursuant to applicable SEC rules, New York Stock Exchange listing standards and its own committee charter and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Willis Towers Watson from independently advising the Compensation Committee.

Assessing External Market Practice

As part of our pay philosophy, our executive compensation program is designed to attract, motivate and retain our executives in an increasingly competitive and complex talent market. To this end, we regularly evaluate industry-specific and general market compensation practices and trends to ensure that our program features and NEO pay opportunities remain appropriately competitive. The Compensation Committee considers publicly available data, provided by its independent compensation consultant, for informational purposes when

23

making its pay decisions. However, market data are not the sole determinants of the Company’s practices or executive pay levels. When determining salaries, target bonus opportunities and annual equity grants for NEOs, the Compensation Committee also considers the performance of the Company and the individual, the nature of an individual’s role within the Company, internal comparisons to the compensation of other Company officers, tenure with the Company and experience in the officer’s current role.

During 2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed CEO compensation information from a group of publicly traded healthcare services companies. The companies included in the analysis were recommended by the Compensation Committee’s consultant and approved by the Compensation Committee. During the fall of 2018, the consultant updated the peer analysis for the CEO position as well as for the Company’s other NEOs. The companies currently included in our peer group were as follows:

In determining the peer group for the studies, the Compensation Committee considered a variety of factors including revenue, income from operations, net income, market capitalization and enterprise value. Based on the advice of its consultant, the Compensation Committee established that top executive pay levels at publicly-traded companies in the healthcare services industry were more closely correlated to factors other than revenue. As such, the peer group was determined with an objective of placing MEDNAX near the median for both income from operations and enterprise value. Given MEDNAX’s profitability, this meant that MEDNAX would rank in the lower quartile of its peers in terms of revenue and in the upper quartile of its peers in terms of net income and market capitalization.

An updated analysis of the remaining peer companies showed that as of year-end 2017, MEDNAX ranked near the peer 25 ^th  percentile in terms of revenue, at the peer 57 ^th  percentile in terms of operating income, near the peer 80 ^th  percentile in terms of net income, near the peer 60 ^th  percentile in terms of enterprise value and near the peer 70 ^th  percentile in terms of market capitalization. MEDNAX also ranked at the peer 57 ^th percentile, 7 ^th percentile and 30 ^th percentile for three-year growth rates in revenues, income from operations and net income, respectively, and near the peer median for annualized total shareholder return over the past three and five year periods. Data from the updated peer analysis are summarized in the tables below:

24

The Compensation Committee reviews a variety of other areas including key incentive design features, equity grant programs, historical CEO bonus payout levels, stock ownership policies, Board of Directors compensation and other policies relating to officer and Board member compensation from time to time relative to MEDNAX’s peers. In addition, the Compensation Committee periodically reviews information relating to NEO compensation practices as developed from companies considered to be MEDNAX peers by proxy advisory firms. However, since some of these advisory firms determine peers based primarily on comparable revenue, the Compensation Committee has not used information from these companies in evaluating NEO salaries, bonus opportunities and annual equity-based award values. The Compensation Committee believes that information from the peer group it has selected is more relevant.

SECTION IV: THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM IN DETAIL

Base Salary

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves base salary levels at the beginning of each year. Base salary decisions generally reflect the Compensation Committee’s consideration of the external market practices of our peer group for comparable positions, published survey data and subjective factors including the individual’s experience, role, responsibilities and performance. Base salaries for Messrs. Clark and Andreano were increased in January and November 2018, in an effort to bring the overall compensation for both executives closer to the 50 ^th percentile of peers surveyed in the fall of 2017 and 2018.

25

26

2018 Annual Bonus Decisions

The Compensation Committee establishes each NEO’s maximum annual bonus opportunity as a percentage of base salary in effect at the end of the year. The target bonus opportunity for each NEO is equal to 50% of the NEO’s maximum bonus opportunity. In March of 2018, the Compensation Committee established the income from operations performance goals set forth in the table above. The income from operations goals established by the Compensation Committee reflected an assumption that a negotiation to renew one of the Company’s anesthesiology service contracts would be favorably resolved, despite receiving notice of non-renewal to be effective July 1, 2018. Following the unfavorable outcome of the contract renewal, the Compensation Committee did not modify the bonus plan’s income from operations goals but instead determined that it would consider appropriate adjustments to the final 2018 income from operations results when determining the earned bonus. In February 2019, the Compensation Committee, having determined that the non-renewal of the anesthesiology contract was not within the control of management, approved an adjustment to the income from operations results of $28.8 million relating to financial impacts associated with the non-renewal of the anesthesiology contract. As such, the income from operations results used to determine executive officer bonuses for 2018 was increased from the GAAP-reported total of $445.8 million to $474.6 million and the corresponding bonus earned by each of Dr. Medel, Ms. Lopez-Blanco and Messrs. Calabro, Clark and Andreano was calculated at 44.6% of the target bonus opportunity for each executive officer. The Compensation Committee approved the payment of a prorated portion of Mr. Farber’s target bonus for 2018.

In addition to the annual bonus amount reflected in the table above, Mr. Farber also received a sign-on bonus in August 2018 in the amount of $300,000, which he is required to reimburse to the Company if, prior to the one-year anniversary of his employment with the Company, he terminates his employment other than for good reason or other than due to his death or disability, and $300,000 to offset the costs and fees associated with relocation.

Equity-Based Awards

2018 Equity-Based Awards

The Compensation Committee approved the March 1, 2018 equity-based awards outlined below in February 2018. These equity-based awards were divided equally into performance share awards and time-based restricted stock awards for each of Dr. Medel, Ms. Lopez-Blanco and Messrs. Calabro, Clark and Andreano. For 2018, the Compensation Committee increased the value of the equity awards for Dr. Medel, Mr. Calabro and Ms. Lopez-Blanco in recognition of the increasing complexity of the Company’s business, and the value of each of the executive’s continued oversight and leadership during this critical time. The increases were as follows:

The Compensation Committee also increased the value of Messrs. Clark and Andreano’s annual equity grant to $1,050,000 and $750,000, respectively, to bring their overall compensation closer to the market median.

For 2019, the Compensation Committee decided to decrease the equity grant values for Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro back to the historical levels of $6,150,000, and $3,750,000, respectively, in light of the decline of the Company’s stock price in the latter part of 2018 and early 2019.

27

50% of the equity-based award is granted in performance shares that:

The approach described in the table above reflects the Compensation Committee’s desire to set rigorous performance goals in a highly volatile and uncertain environment, while also rewarding NEOs when the Company achieves these goals and delivers sustained results for our shareholders.

In setting financial performance goals for these performance share awards, the Compensation Committee received recommendations from management based on the Company’s strategic plan for the performance measurement period. The Compensation Committee, working with its independent compensation consultant and Company management, evaluated the impact of various drivers on revenue and EBITDA in determining the 2018 grants.

The 2018 performance goals incorporate specific factors that were expected to have a direct impact on the results for this performance period, while remaining challenging to achieve. The growth rate targets for the 2018 performance period differ from the Company’s historical 5-year average growth rates because of volatility in the various drivers that impact results from year to year. Other drivers considered in setting the performance goals included, but were not necessarily limited to: acquisition-related activities, including size, type, timing and volume of acquisitions, same-unit volume growth, expense-related initiatives and reimbursement-related factors, including payor mix. The Compensation Committee established net revenue and EBITDA goals that reflected the financial challenges and uncertain operating environment, particularly with regard to year-over-year changes in EBITDA, that the Compensation Committee felt were still rigorous yet achievable. At the time the goals were approved, the Company’s internal forecast for the Performance Share measurement period projected a modest decline in EBITDA and modest growth in net revenue, due to changes in payor mix, reduced patient volumes and increased pressures on clinical compensation. The Compensation Committee developed performance goals in light of these forecasts, noting that it would be extremely unlikely that an above-target award would be earned based on the financial forecasts at the time of the goal. Even though the 2018 growth rates underlying the 2018 equity awards were lower than our historical growth rates, the Compensation Committee believed that they were challenging to achieve in the current market and were more rigorous growth goals than the prior year. Consideration was also given to those factors that impacted previous year results (positively or negatively) but were not anticipated to impact 2018 results. In 2017, the Compensation Committee elected to eliminate a retesting feature of the equity program that allowed an additional opportunity to earn performance shares if the performance criteria were not met during the initial performance period, and the 2018 equity awards did not include any retesting feature.

28

The Compensation Committee believes the above approach used to establish financial performance goals for performance share awards results in goals that are challenging yet realistic and achievable, adequately rigorous and effective in continuing to motivate the executive team to drive the strong shareholder returns historically generated by the Company. Accordingly, the Committee believes the performance shares awarded appropriately align Company performance with executive compensation.

While this discussion of 2018 equity awards relates to growth targets for the 2018 performance period, we believe our approach to granting performance shares also creates long-term alignment, given that the value of the award realized by the NEOs will depend on the value of our stock when the shares vest over a multi-year period. As a result, we believe our NEOs are incentivized not only to execute the Company’s growth strategy but also to maintain discipline in its acquisition-related activities and processes in order to generate sustainable longer-term growth and increased shareholder value. We believe our approach also addresses our critical need to retain the highest-caliber executives in our industry — especially as the challenges in the healthcare sector grow increasingly more complex and competition for executive talent in the healthcare sector increases.

The table below outlines the 2018 equity award program:

29

Actual Performance and Shares Earned under the 2017 and 2018 Performance Share Awards

For the period from April 1, 2017 to March 31, 2018, the Company’s net revenue and EBITDA, the metrics on which the 2017 performance share awards were measured, grew by 8.0%, in the case of net revenue, and -9.3%, in the case of EBITDA. In accordance with the pre-established target growth rates of 2.0% to 11.0% for net revenue and -12.9% to 2.5% for EBITDA, our NEOs earned 100% for each metric, and 100% of their target performance share awards overall. The shares earned will vest over the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued employment.

For the period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018, the Company’s net revenue and EBITDA, the metrics on which the 2018 performance share awards were measured, grew by 5.5%, in the case of net revenue, and -3.2%, in the case of EBITDA. In accordance with the pre-established target growth rates of 2.0% to 9.0% for net revenue and -5.0% to 5.0% for EBITDA, our NEOs earned 100% for each metric, and 100% of their target performance share awards overall. The shares earned will vest over the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to continued employment.

Inducement Grant

In August 2018, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Farber 100,000 restricted shares of our common stock in connection with his initial employment with the Company, which shares will vest 50% on September 1, 2019, 30% on September 1, 2020, and 20% on September 1, 2021, in each case subject to Mr. Farber’s continued employment.

Other Practices, Policies & Guidelines

Equity Grant Practices

The Compensation Committee determines the effective date of annual equity-based awards without regard to current or anticipated stock price levels. Although historically made around mid-year, the Compensation Committee made the 2018 annual equity grant in March of 2018 and may also make, and in the past has made, grants during the course of the year, primarily for new hires, promotions, to retain valued employees or to reward exceptional performance. These grants may be subject to performance conditions and/or time-based vesting, and are issued on the date of grant approval or upon a date certain following the grant approval date.

We follow equity grant procedures designed to promote the proper authorization, documentation and accounting for all equity grants. Pursuant to these procedures the Compensation Committee or the Board of

30

Directors must formally approve all equity awards during an in person or telephonic meeting or by the unanimous written consent executed by all members of the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors, as the case may be, it being understood that no equity award granted pursuant to any such written consent may have an effective date earlier than the date that all executed counterparts of such unanimous written consent are delivered to the General Counsel of the Company.

The grant-date fair value of our equity-based awards will be the closing sales price for a share of our common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on the effective date of the grant as approved by the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors, which date may not be prior to either the date such grant was approved or the commencement date of employment of the employee to whom the equity award is being made.

Our “insiders” can only buy or sell Company stock in accordance with our Insider Trading Policy, and our employees generally can only buy or sell Company stock in accordance with our Policy Statement on Inside Information and Insider Trading for All Employees.

NEOs are allowed to vote performance shares and restricted stock as a shareholder based on the number of shares held under restriction. Any dividends declared with respect to any performance share or restricted stock awards would be held until the awards vest, at which time the dividends would be paid to the NEOs. If performance shares or restricted stock are forfeited, the NEO’s rights to receive the dividends declared with respect to those shares would be forfeited as well. At present, the Company does not pay dividends and it has no current intention to do so in the future.

Clawback Policy

The Company has adopted a “clawback policy” that permits the Company to seek to recover certain amounts of incentive compensation, including both cash and equity, awarded to any executive officer (as defined in the Exchange Act ) on or after January 1, 2014 if payment of such compensation was based on the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a restatement of our financial statements due to misconduct, and if the executive officer engaged in improper conduct that materially contributed to the need for restatement, and a lower amount of incentive compensation would have been earned based on the restated financial results.

Stock Ownership and Retention Policy

The Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s Board of Directors and NEOs should maintain a material personal financial stake in the Company through the ownership of shares of the Company’s common stock to promote a long-term perspective in managing the enterprise and to align shareholder, director and executive interests.

Each of our NEOs are required to own shares of MEDNAX common stock with a value of not less than a specified multiple of his or her base salary. The policy also requires NEOs to retain 50% of net after-tax shares acquired during the year upon vesting (or exercise of stock options) unless his or her ownership level was satisfied as of the beginning of the year. These multiples were determined in accordance with current market practice.

31

The chart below shows the multiple of base salary ownership requirements and actual ownership levels as of December 31, 2018:

As the table above reflects, our NEOs hold a significant investment in MEDNAX, which is a strong reflection of our culture and aligns with our compensation philosophy.

Shares that count toward the ownership requirement are as follows:

The Compensation Committee will evaluate NEO ownership levels annually and will review this policy from time to time and, following consultation with the Board of Directors, make modifications as necessary or appropriate.

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

All MEDNAX directors, management, financial and other insiders are prohibited from engaging in transactions in MEDNAX securities or derivatives of MEDNAX securities that might be considered hedging, such as selling short or buying or selling options. In addition, it is against the policy for such persons to hold securities in margin accounts or pledge MEDNAX securities as collateral for a loan, unless such person clearly demonstrates the financial capacity to repay the loan without resort to the pledged securities.

Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans

We maintain a Thrift and Profit Sharing Plan (the “401(k) Plan”), which is a 401(k) plan, to enable eligible employees to save for retirement through a tax-advantaged combination of elective employee contributions and our discretionary matching contributions, and provide employees the opportunity to directly manage their retirement plan assets through a variety of investment options. The 401(k) Plan allows eligible employees to elect to contribute from 1% to 60% of their eligible compensation to an investment trust on a pre-tax and/or Roth after-tax basis, up to the maximum dollar amounts permitted by law. The 401(k) Plan also offers employees the option to voluntarily contribute additional funds on a non-deductible after-tax basis subject to certain limits. In 2018, the maximum employee pre-tax and/or Roth elective contribution to the 401(k) Plan was $18,500, plus an additional $6,000 for employees who were at least 50 years old in 2018. In 2019, the maximum employee pre-tax and/or Roth elective contribution to the 401(k) Plan will be $19,000. Eligible compensation generally means all wages, salaries and fees for services from the Company, up to a maximum specified amount permitted by law.

32

Matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan are discretionary. For 2018, the Company matched 100% of the first 4% of eligible compensation that each eligible participant contributed to the 401(k) Plan on his or her behalf. The portion of an employee’s account under the 401(k) Plan that is attributable to matching contributions vests as follows: 30% after one year of service, 60% after two years of service, and 100% after three years of service. However, regardless of the number of years of service, an employee is fully vested in our matching contributions (and the earnings thereon) if the employee retires at age 65 or later, or terminates employment by reason of death or total and permanent disability. The 401(k) Plan provides for a variety of different investment options, in which the employee’s and the Company’s contributions are invested.

Although the Company maintains a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, none of the NEOs participate in that plan.

The amounts of the Company’s matching contributions under the 401(k) Plan for 2018 for each of the NEOs are included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

Benefits and Perquisites

We provide our NEOs with certain benefits designed to protect them and their immediate families in the event of illness, disability, or death. We believe it is necessary to provide these benefits in order for us to be successful in attracting and retaining executives in a competitive marketplace, and to provide financial security in these circumstances. NEOs are eligible for health and welfare benefits available to similarly situated eligible Company employees during active employment under the same terms and conditions. These benefits include medical, dental, vision, short-term and long-term disability and group-term life insurance coverage.

Pursuant to the terms of their Employment Agreements, each of the NEOs are entitled to 38 days paid time off each year for vacation, illness, injury, personal days and other similar purposes in accordance with our policies in effect from time to time. Any paid time off not used during a calendar year may be carried over to the next year to the extent permitted under those policies. Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro each are entitled under their Employment Agreements to utilize, for personal travel, the aircraft that the Company leases. Dr. Medel’s personal use of the aircraft may not exceed 95 hours of flight in any calendar year, and Mr. Calabro’s personal use of the aircraft may not exceed 50 hours of flight in any calendar year without the consent of the Compensation Committee. The incremental cost to the Company of these benefits for Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro is included in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

The Compensation Committee has reviewed our perquisites expenditures, and believes they continue to be an important element of the overall compensation package to retain current officers, and in fact command a higher perceived value than the actual cost.

Termination of Employment and Change in Control Agreements

As described in greater detail below, the Employment Agreements between the Company and each of the NEOs provide for the payment of certain compensation and benefits in the event of the termination of an executive’s employment, the amount of which varies depending upon the reason for such termination. The Compensation Committee has reviewed the essential terms of these termination provisions, and believes they are reasonable, appropriate, and generally consistent with market practice. Those provisions include a reimbursement by the Company to Mr. Calabro of any excise tax imposed upon the executive pursuant to Section 4999 of the Code with respect to any “excess parachute payments,” as that term is defined in Section 280G of the Code, that the executive receives as a result of a Change in Control. In the case of Dr. Medel, his current Employment Agreement provides that, if any amount payable to Dr. Medel in connection with a Change in Control would be subject to excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, then the Company will reduce the payment to an amount equal to the largest portion of such payment that would result in no portion of such payment being subject to excise tax (unless such reduction would result in Dr. Medel receiving, on an after tax basis, an amount lower than

33

the unreduced payment after taking into account all applicable federal, state and local employment taxes, income taxes and excise taxes, in which case the payment amount would not be reduced).

In certain situations pursuant to the terms of the award agreement or an executive’s Employment Agreement, the performance and service requirements may be waived and vesting accelerated.

Additionally, any unvested restricted stock is generally forfeited upon termination of the employment of the NEOs. The Employment Agreements with our NEOs provide, however, that their restricted stock may vest or continue to vest after termination of employment in certain circumstances. For a more detailed explanation of the employment agreement terms governing vesting of equity in various termination events, please see the section below entitled “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control”.

34

35

36

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

In August 2011, the Company entered into a new Employment Agreement with Dr. Medel that replaced his previous Employment Agreement entered into in August 2008. In October 2017, the Company entered into an amendment to Dr. Medel’s Employment Agreement to extend its term until August 2021. In August 2008, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Calabro. The Company entered into new Employment Agreements with each of Ms. Lopez-Blanco and Messrs. Clark and Andreano, in February 2018. In August 2018, the Company entered into an Employment Agreement with Mr. Farber. In February 2019, the Company entered into new Employment Agreements with Messrs. Clark and Andreano, which replaced their previous Employment Agreements. Each of these Employment Agreements provides for the Company to make certain payments and provide certain benefits to the executive upon termination of employment with the Company. Those provisions are summarized below.

Termination by Company for Cause . In the event that an executive’s employment with the Company is terminated by the Company for Cause, then the Company will pay the executive his base salary through the termination date at the rate in effect at the termination date and reimburse the executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination.

The term “Cause” is defined in each of the Employment Agreements for Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro to mean the executive’s (i) engagement in (A) willful misconduct resulting in material harm to the Company, or (B) gross negligence; (ii) conviction of, or pleading nolo contendere to, a felony or any other crime involving fraud, financial misconduct, or misappropriation of the Company’s assets; (iii) willful and continual failure, after written notice, to (A) perform substantially his employment duties consistent with his position and authority, or (B) follow, consistent with his position, duties, and authorities, the reasonable lawful mandates of his supervisor; or (iv) breach of the requirements of his employment agreement with respect to the Company’s confidential information. For purposes of this definition, acts or omissions taken by the executive in a good faith belief that they were in the best interests of the Company or if done at the express direction of the Company’s Board of Directors will not be deemed willful or grossly negligent. In each of the Employment Agreements for Messrs. Farber and Clark, the term “Cause” is defined to mean (i) engagement in (A) willful misconduct resulting in material harm to the Company, or (B) gross negligence; (ii) conviction of, or pleading nolo contendere to, a felony or any other crime involving fraud, financial misconduct, or misappropriation of the Company’s assets; (iii) willful and continual failure, after written notice, to (A) perform substantially his employment duties consistent with his position and authority, or (B) follow, consistent with his position, duties, and authorities, the reasonable lawful mandates of his supervisor or the Company’s Board of Directors; (iv) failure or refusal to comply with a reasonable policy, standard or regulation of Employer in any material respect; or (v) breach of the requirements of his employment agreement with respect to the Company’s confidential information. In the Employment Agreement for Mr. Andreano, the term “Cause” is defined to mean (i) any act or omission of the executive which is materially contrary to the business interests, reputation or goodwill of the Company; (ii) a

37

material breach by the executive of his obligations under the Employment Agreement, which breach is not promptly remedied upon written notice from the Company; (iii) the executive’s refusal to perform his duties as assigned pursuant to the Employment Agreement other than a refusal which is remedied by the executive promptly after receipt of written notice thereof by the Company; or (iv) the executive’s failure or refusal to comply with a reasonable policy, standard or regulation of the Company in any material respect.

Termination by Executive due to Poor Health or due to Executive’s Death . In the event that an executive terminates his employment due to the executive’s health becoming impaired to any extent that makes the continued performance of his duties hazardous to the executive’s physical or mental health or life (“Poor Health”), or the executive’s employment terminates because of his death, then the Company will pay to the executive (or his estate) his base salary to the termination date, pay the executive a pro rata portion of the bonus that the executive would have received had his employment not terminated (as determined in accordance with the Employment Agreement) and reimburse the executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination. In addition, if the executive terminates his employment due to Poor Health, the executive will receive any disability payments otherwise payable under any plans provided by the Company.

Termination due to Disability . If the Company terminates the employment of Dr. Medel or Mr. Calabro by reason of his Disability, then the Company will continue to pay Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro, Farber, Clark and Andreano base salary for a period of 12 months after the termination date and the actual performance bonus, on a pro rata basis, that would have been payable to the executive for the fiscal year if the executive had not been terminated.

Termination by Company without Cause or by Executive for Good Reason or due to Change in Control . If the Company terminates the employment of Dr. Medel or Mr. Calabro without Cause (which requires not less than 90 days’ notice), or Mr. Calabro terminates his employment for any reason within one year after a Change in Control, the Company terminates the employment of Mr. Calabro within 24 months following a Change in Control, or Dr. Medel or Mr. Calabro terminates his employment for Good Reason, then the Company will (a) pay that executive’s base salary through the termination date plus any reimbursement owed to that executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (b) continue to pay the executive’s base salary for a period of 24 months after the termination date, (c) on the first and second anniversaries of the termination date, pay the executive an amount equal to the greater of his “average annual performance bonus” or his bonus for the year immediately preceding his termination and (d) pay the executive a pro rata portion of the bonus he would have received for the year in which his employment terminates. If the termination is due to a Change in Control, then the performance bonuses referred to in (c) above would be paid to the executive in a lump sum within 90 days of the termination date. If the Company terminates the employment of Dr. Medel without Cause or Dr. Medel terminates his employment for Good Reason in either case within 24 months following a Change in Control, the Company will pay his base salary through the termination date plus any reimbursement owed to him for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination and continue to pay Dr. Medel’s base salary for 36 months after the termination date and, within 90 days following such termination date, an amount equal to three times the greater of his “average annual performance bonus” or his bonus for the year immediately preceding his termination. If the Company terminates the employment of Messrs. Farber or Clark without Cause, or Messrs. Farber or Clark terminates his employment for Good Reason following a Change in Control, then the Company will (a) pay that executive’s base salary through the termination date plus any reimbursement owed to that executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (b) continue to pay the executive’s base salary for a period of 24 months after the termination date, (c) on the first anniversary of the termination date, pay the executive an amount equal to 1.5 times the executive’s “average annual performance bonus”, and (d) pay the executive a pro rata portion of the bonus he would have received for the year in which his employment terminates. For this purpose, “average annual performance bonus” means the average of the executive’s earned performance bonus as a percentage of base salary for the three years preceding such termination date, multiplied by the executive’s base salary at the time of termination. If Mr. Andreano terminates his employment for Good Reason (other than a Change in Control Good Reason, as defined below), then the Company will (a) pay him base salary through the termination

38

date plus any reimbursement owed to him for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (b) continue to pay him base salary for a period of 12 months (18 months if termination is in connection with a Change in Control) after the termination date in the case of Ms. Lopez-Blanco and base salary for a period of 18 months (24 months if termination is in connection with a Change in Control) after the termination date in the case of Mr. Andreano, (c) pay him a pro rata portion of the performance bonus he would have received for the year in which his employment terminates, and (d) pay the executive an amount equal to the greater of his “average annual performance bonus” (as defined in his Employment Agreement) or his bonus for the year immediately preceding his termination. If the Company terminates the employment of Mr. Andreano without Cause, then the Company will (a) pay his base salary through the termination date plus any reimbursement owed to him for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination, (b) continue to pay his base salary for a period of 18 months after the termination date, (c) pay him a pro rata portion of the performance bonus he would have received for the year in which his employment terminates, and (d) within 30 days of the first anniversary of the termination date, pay him an amount equal to his “average annual performance bonus.” For this purpose, “average annual performance bonus” means (i) the average of the percentage of the performance bonus target achieved by the executive for the three full calendar years prior to the termination date. If the termination is due to a Change in Control, then the performance bonuses referred to in (d) above would be paid to the executive in a lump sum within 90 days of the termination date. For purposes of this definition, “Good Reason” will not be deemed to exist unless the executive provides the Company with written notice of the existence of such condition within 180 days after the initial existence of the condition and the Company fails to remedy the condition within 30 days after its receipt of such notice.

The Employment Agreement for each of Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro defines “Good Reason” to mean (i) a material diminution in the executive’s base salary or performance bonus eligibility; (ii) a material diminution in the executive’s authority, duties, or responsibilities; (iii) a material diminution in the authority, duties or responsibilities of the supervisor to whom the executive is required to report, including, in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, a requirement that Dr. Medel report to a corporate officer or employee instead of reporting directly to the Board of Directors of the Company; (iv) a material diminution in the budget over which the executive retains authority; (v) a material change in the geographic location at which the executive must perform the services under his Employment Agreement; or (vi) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by the Company under his Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement for Mr. Farber defines “Good Reason” to mean (i) a decrease in the executive’s base salary; (ii) a decrease in the performance bonus potential utilized by the Company in determining a performance bonus for the executive; (iii) a failure by the Compensation Committee to approve an annual equity grant of at least the amount set forth in his Employment Agreement; (iv) assigned any position, duties, responsibilities or compensation that is inconsistent with his current position, duties, responsibilities or compensation; (v) a material diminution in his authorities, duties or responsibilities, provided that, if following a Change in Control, the Company’s stock is no longer listed for trading on a national securities exchange, Mr. Farber has Good Reason to terminate his employment; (vi) Mr. Farber is required to report to any person other than the senior most executive officer of the Company, the Board or a duly constituted committee thereof, or if the senior most executive officer of the Company is any person other than Dr. Medel or Mr. Calabro, unless Mr. Farber becomes the senior most executive officer of the Company; (vii) there is a material diminution in the authority, duties, or responsibilities of the senior most executive officer of the Company, other than such a material diminution with respect to Dr. Medel, where such authority, duties or responsibilities are transferred to Mr. Calabro; (viii) Mr. Farber is required to be based in any office or location outside of the metropolitan area where the Company’s present corporate offices are located; or (ix) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach of this Agreement by Employer. The Employment Agreement for Messrs. Clark and Andreano defines “Good Reason” to mean (i) a decrease in the executive’s base salary; (ii) a decrease in the performance bonus potential utilized by the Company in determining a performance bonus for the executive or failure by the Compensation Committee to approve an annual equity award in an amount consistent with the requirements of his Employment Agreement; (iii) within a two year period after a Change in Control, the executive is either (a) assigned any position, duties, responsibilities or compensation that is inconsistent with his position, duties, responsibilities or compensation prior to such Change in Control, or (b) required to report to any other person other than the President or Chief

39

Executive Officer of Employer in place just prior to the Change in Control (provided that the executive is not Chief Executive Officer of the Company or its equivalent and reports directly to the Board), or (c) forced to relocate to another location more than 25 miles from the Company’s location prior to the Change in Control (each of (iii)(a), (b) and (c) a “Change in Control Good Reason”); (iv) the assignment to the executive of any officer position inconsistent with his present position or material diminution in authority, other than any isolated, insubstantial and inadvertent action not taken in bad faith and which is remedied by the Company promptly after receipt of written notice; (v) the requirement by the Company that the executive be based in any office or location outside of the metropolitan area where the Company’s present corporate offices are located, except for travel reasonably required in the performance of the executive’s duties; or (vi) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by the Company of the executive’s Employment Agreement.

The term “Change in Control” is defined in each executive’s Employment Agreement to mean (i) the acquisition by a person or an entity or a group of persons and entities, directly or indirectly, of more than 50% of the Company’s common stock in a single transaction or a series of transactions (hereinafter referred to as a “50% Change in Control”); (ii) a merger or other form of corporate reorganization resulting in an actual or de facto 50% Change in Control; or (iii) the failure of Applicable Directors (as defined below) to constitute a majority of the Company’s Board of Directors during any two (2) consecutive year period after the date of each of the executive’s Employment Agreement (the “Two-Year Period”). “Applicable Directors” means those individuals who are members of the Company’s Board of Directors at the inception of the Two-Year Period and any new Director whose election to the Board of Directors or nomination for election to the Board of Directors was approved (prior to any vote thereon by the shareholders) by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Directors then still in office who either were Directors at the beginning of the Two-Year Period at issue or whose election or nomination for election during such Two-Year Period was previously approved as provided in this sentence.

Termination by Executive . An executive may terminate his employment, other than for Good Reason or due to a Change in Control, upon 90 days’ notice to the Company. In such event, the Company will continue to pay the executive his base salary through the termination date, and in the case of Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro, if in connection with such termination the executive gives sufficient notice and executes a general release of the Company, then the Company will pay the executive a pro rata portion of the bonus that the executive would have received had his employment not terminated (as determined in accordance with his Employment Agreement). In addition, the Company will reimburse each executive for any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination. If the Company specifies a termination date for the employment of any of the NEOs that is less than 90 days, as applicable after the Company’s receipt of written notice of such termination from the executive, then the Company will continue to pay to the executive his base salary for a period ending on such 90 ^th day.

Employment Transition and Severance Agreement . If the Company so requests within five business days following a termination of the employment of Dr. Medel or, Mr. Calabro by reason of the executive’s Disability, termination by the Company without Cause, termination by the executive due to Poor Health, or termination by the executive for Good Reason, then the executive will continue to be employed by the Company on a part-time basis for a period (the “transition period”) to be determined by the Company of up to 90 days, unless extended by mutual agreement. During this transition period, the executive is required to perform such services as may reasonably be required for the transition to others of matters previously within the executive’s responsibilities. Unless otherwise mutually agreed, the executive will not be required to serve more than five days per month during the transition period. For services during the transition period, the executive will be compensated at a daily rate equal to his base salary immediately prior to the termination of his employment divided by 365.

Continuation of Group Health Coverage . The Employment Agreement for each named executive officer also provides for the continuation in any self-insured, group health plan sponsored by the Company as if the executive were still an employee of the Company during any severance period or transition period. For this purpose, “severance period” means the period after the termination date during which the executive continues to receive base salary payments following the termination of employment as described above. In addition, upon

40

termination of the executive’s employment for any reason (in the case of Dr. Medel or, in the case of the other executives for any reason other than Cause) and only if the executive and his eligible dependents first irrevocably decline any continuation coverage provided pursuant to the applicable provisions in the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, the executive and his eligible dependents will be entitled to elect to continue in any self-insured, group health plan sponsored by the Company as if the executive were still an employee of the Company (the “Enhanced Coverage”), during a period of five years following the later of the termination date, the end of the severance period or the end of the transition period. In its sole discretion, the Company may provide healthcare insurance to the executive and his eligible dependents through one or several insurance carriers selected by the Company in lieu of the Enhanced Coverage (the “Alternate Enhanced Coverage”), provided the coverage is substantially comparable. The executive will pay the full cost of the Enhanced Coverage or the cost of the Alternate Enhanced Coverage, up to the cost of the plan for such period of coverage for similarly situated employees and covered beneficiaries.

Payments in the Event of a Change in Control . The Employment Agreement for Mr. Calabro requires the Company to increase or “gross-up” any amounts payable to Mr. Calabro that are contingent upon a Change in Control by an amount that will reimburse the executive, on an after-tax basis, for any excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, on any amounts that are deemed to be “excess parachute payments,” and for any interest or penalties incurred by an executive with respect to any such excise tax.

Vesting of Equity Awards. The Employment Agreement for each of Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro provides that all unvested stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock based awards granted to an executive by the Company will continue to vest until fully vested following the termination of an executive’s employment due to Disability, termination without Cause, Good Reason, Poor Health or death. In addition, in the event of a Change in Control, for each of Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro, such awards will automatically vest and, in the case of stock options and stock appreciation rights, become immediately exercisable. In the event Messrs. Farber or Clark’s employment is terminated by the Company without Cause, or by the executive for Good Reason, any unvested equity awards shall automatically vest. Further, in the event Mr. Farber’s employment is terminated due to Disability, Poor Health or death, any unvested equity awards shall automatically vest. In the event Messrs. Clark or Andreano’s employment is terminated due to Disability or death, all unvested stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and other stock based awards granted to him by the Company will continue to vest until fully vested following the termination of his employment. In the event that, at any time following a Change in Control, Mr. Andreano is terminated by the Company without Cause or by the executive for Good Reason, provided that termination by the executive for Good Reason related to a diminution in duties following a Change in Control must occur within the 24-month period following a Change in Control, any unvested stock options, unvested restricted stock, unvested stock appreciation rights and other unvested incentive compensation awards, held by the executive on the termination date will automatically vest and, in the case of stock options, become immediately exercisable as of the effective date of such termination.

In the case of Messrs. Clark and Andreano, their Employment Agreements also provide that unvested equity awards will vest in certain situations following a Change in Control absent a termination of the Executive’s employment unless more favorable provisions are included in a particular grant. If, prior to the one year anniversary of the effective date of a Change in Control, the employment by the Company or its affiliates or successors of both Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro is terminated for any reason, or they both no longer hold the positions they held just prior to the Change in Control (and neither holds the top executive position in the Company), then the unvested equity awards granted to each of Messrs. Clark and Andreano will become fully vested and payable to the executive on the first anniversary of the effective date of the Change in Control; provided, however, that any portion of the unvested equity awards that is scheduled to become vested and payable pursuant to its terms prior to the first anniversary of such Change in Control will become vested and payable to the executive pursuant to its terms. Further, if, after the one year anniversary of the effective date of a Change in Control, the employment by the Company or its affiliates or successors of both Dr. Medel and Mr. Calabro is terminated for any reason, or they both no longer hold the positions they held just prior to the Change in Control (provided that neither holds the top executive position in the Company), then the unvested

41

equity awards granted to each of Messrs. Clark and Andreano will become fully vested and payable to the executive on the one year anniversary of the termination date, or date of the change in position of Roger J. Medel, M.D. or Joseph M. Calabro, whichever termination date or date in change of position is later; provided, however, that any portion of the unvested equity awards that is scheduled to become vested and payable pursuant to its terms prior to the one year anniversary of such termination date or date of change in position will become vested and payable to the executive pursuant to its terms. In either case, the vesting of the unvested equity awards is subject to continued employment of Messrs. Clark or Andreano through the date on which the unvested equity awards would vest in the situations described above.

Payments of Unused Leave Time . In accordance with the Company’s paid time off policies, an executive officer will be paid any earned but unused paid time off upon termination. This payment will occur in all termination events. In addition to the leave time that the executive accrues in any year, such executive may carry forward 15 days of leave time from the prior year; therefore, the maximum payout upon termination for each executive would be the value of such executive’s contracted annual leave time plus 15 carry-over days.

Restrictive Covenants . Pursuant to his or her Employment Agreement, each executive officer is subject to certain restrictive covenants that survive termination of employment. If the executive fails to comply with any of those restrictive covenants, he or she will not be entitled to receive any further payments or benefits as a result of the termination of his or her employment (other than his or her base salary through the date of termination and reimbursement of any reasonable business expenses incurred through the date of termination). In addition, the Company then will have the right to terminate without advance notice any future payments and benefits of every kind that otherwise would be due to the executive on account of his or her termination of employment.

The following tables illustrate the payments and benefits that each of Dr. Medel and Messrs. Calabro, Clark and Andreano would have received under his or her Employment Agreement if his employment with the Company had terminated for any of the reasons described above on December 31, 2018. The amounts presented in the tables, reflect compensation (including equity ownership) at such year end, are estimates only and do not necessarily reflect the actual value of the payments and other benefits that would be received by the NEOs, which would only be known at the time that employment actually terminates.

42

43

44

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAY RATIO

Our CEO’s annual total compensation for 2018 was $9,938,017, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table included in this Proxy Statement. The calculation of annual total compensation of all employees, excluding our CEO, as of December 31, 2018 was determined using 2018 W-2 compensation, on an annualized basis for full-time employees who were not employed by us for all of 2018. Our median employee’s annual total compensation for 2018 was $90,996. As a result, we estimate that our CEO’s 2018 annual total compensation was approximately 109 times that of our median employee.

45

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Each non-employee Director receives the following compensation for their service: (i) an annual retainer fee of $65,000, payable quarterly, (ii) an annual fee of $7,500 for attendance at meetings, payable quarterly, (iii) an additional annual retainer fee of $50,000, payable quarterly, for the Chairman of the Board of Directors and an additional annual retainer fee of $25,000, payable quarterly, for the Lead Independent Director, (iv) an additional annual retainer fee of $20,000, payable quarterly, for the chair of the Audit Committee, and (v) an additional annual retainer fee of $10,000 per committee, payable quarterly, for the chair of any committee of the Board of Directors other than the Audit Committee. In addition, each year, each non-employee Director is granted restricted stock with a grant date fair value of $127,500, vesting in equal annual increments over a three-year period commencing on the anniversary of the date of grant.

The Board of Directors’ policy for awarding restricted stock also applies to each non-employee Director upon his or her initial election or appointment to the Board of Directors. The grant date fair value of the award will be $200,000 with a three-year vesting period. We provide grants of equity to our Directors because we believe that it helps foster a long-term perspective and aligns our Directors’ interests with that of our shareholders. All non-management members of our Board of Directors are required to own MEDNAX common stock worth three times their annual base cash retainer fee. MEDNAX also reimburses all of its Directors for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the rendering of services as a Director.

The following table includes all non-employee Directors who served in 2018. Dr. Medel does not earn additional income for his service as a Director.

46

SHARE OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires MEDNAX’s Directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock, to file with the SEC reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock. Our Directors, executive officers and greater than 10% shareholders are also required by rules promulgated by the SEC to furnish MEDNAX with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to MEDNAX, the absence of a Form 3, 4 or 5, or representations from certain reporting persons that no Forms 5 were required, MEDNAX believes that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its Directors, officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.