REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 |
|
☐
|
Pre-Effective
Amendment No.
|
|
☐
|
Post-Effective Amendment No. 244
|
|
☑
|
and/or
|
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE
INVESTMENT COMPANY ACT OF 1940 |
|
|
Amendment No. 244
|
|
☑
|
333 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois
|
|
60606
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Christopher M. Rohrbacher
Vice President and Secretary
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Name and Address of Agent for Service)
|
|
Copies to:
Eric F. Fess
Chapman and Cutler LLP
111 West Monroe Street
Chicago, Illinois 60603
|
☒
|
|
immediately upon filing pursuant to paragraph (b)
|
|
☐
|
|
on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
|
☐
|
|
on (date) pursuant to paragraph (b)
|
|
☐
|
|
75 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(2)
|
☐
|
|
60 days after filing pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
|
|
☐
|
|
on (date) pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of Rule 485.
|
☐
|
This post-effective amendment designates a new effective date for a previously filed post-effective amendment.
|
|
|
Mutual Funds
|
28 October
2020 |
Fund Name
|
Class A
|
Class C
|
Class R3
|
Class R6
|
Class I
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
(formerly Nuveen High Income Bond Fund) |
FJSIX
|
FCSIX
|
FANSX
|
—
|
FJSYX
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
FCDDX
|
FCBCX
|
FABSX
|
FSFRX
|
FCBYX
|
The Securities and Exchange Commission has not approved or disapproved these securities or passed upon the adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
|
Beginning on January 1, 2021, as permitted by regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission, paper copies of the Funds’ annual and semi-annual shareholder reports will no longer be sent by mail, unless you specifically request paper copies of the reports. Instead, the reports will be made available on the Funds’ website (www.nuveen.com), and you will be notified by mail each time a report is posted and provided with a website link to access the report.
If you have already elected to receive shareholder reports electronically, you will not be affected by this change and you need not take any action. You may elect to receive shareholder reports and other communications from the Funds electronically anytime by contacting the financial intermediary (such as a broker-dealer or bank) through which you hold your Fund shares or, if you are a direct investor, by enrolling at www.nuveen.com/e-reports.
You may elect to receive all future shareholder reports in paper free of charge at any time by contacting your financial intermediary or, if you are a direct investor, by calling 800-257-8787 and selecting option #1. Your election to receive reports in paper will apply to all funds held in your account with your financial intermediary or, if you are a direct investor, to all your directly held Nuveen Funds and any other directly held funds within the same group of related investment companies.
|
|
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
Section 1
Fund Summaries
Section 2
How We Manage Your Money
Section 3
How
You Can Buy and Sell Shares
Section 4
General Information
Section 5
Financial Highlights
Appendix—Variations in Sales Charge Reductions and
Waivers Available Through Certain Intermediaries |
|
Class A
|
Class C
|
Class R3
|
Class I
|
|||||
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Purchases
(as a percentage of offering price) |
4.75%
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
||||
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load)
(as a percentage of the lesser of purchase price or redemption proceeds)
1
|
None
|
1.00%
|
None
|
None
|
||||
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Reinvested Dividends
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
||||
Exchange Fee
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
||||
Annual Low Balance Account Fee (for accounts under $1,000)
2
|
$15
|
$15
|
None
|
$15
|
Class A
|
Class C
|
Class R3
|
Class I
|
|||||||||||||
Management Fees
|
0.59
|
%
|
0.59
|
%
|
0.59
|
%
|
0.59
|
%
|
||||||||
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees
|
0.25
|
%
|
1.00
|
%
|
0.50
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
||||||||
Other Expenses
|
0.28
|
%
|
0.28
|
%
|
0.28
|
%
|
0.27
|
%
|
||||||||
Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses
|
0.04
|
%
|
0.04
|
%
|
0.04
|
%
|
0.04
|
%
|
||||||||
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses
|
1.16
|
%
|
1.91
|
%
|
1.41
|
%
|
0.90
|
%
|
||||||||
Fee Waivers and/or Expense Reimbursements
3
|
(0.12
|
)%
|
(0.12
|
)%
|
(0.12
|
)%
|
(0.11
|
)%
|
||||||||
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses After Fee Waivers and/or Expense Reimbursements
|
1.04
|
%
|
1.79
|
%
|
1.29
|
%
|
0.79
|
%
|
2
|
Section 1
|
Class A
|
Class C
|
Class R3
|
Class I
|
||||||||||
1 Year
|
$
|
576
|
$
|
182
|
$
|
131
|
$
|
81
|
|||||
3 Years
|
$
|
806
|
$
|
579
|
$
|
425
|
$
|
267
|
|||||
5 Years
|
$
|
1,063
|
$
|
1,012
|
$
|
751
|
$
|
479
|
|||||
10 Years
|
$
|
1,799
|
$
|
2,215
|
$
|
1,672
|
$
|
1,090
|
|
·
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
CoCos
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
CLOs
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
|
|
Section 1
|
3
|
4
|
Section 1
|
Section 1
|
5
|
6
|
Section 1
|
Section 1
|
7
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Section 1
|
Name
|
Title
|
Portfolio Manager of Fund Since
|
Anders Persson, CFA
|
Senior Managing Director
|
July 2020
|
Jean C. Lin, CFA
|
Managing Director
|
January 2019
|
William Martin
*
|
Senior Managing Director
|
July 2020
|
Karina Bubeck, CFA
|
Managing Director
|
July 2020
|
Aashh Parekh, CFA
|
Managing Director
|
July 2020
|
Brenda A. Langenfeld, CFA
|
Managing Director
|
August 2020
|
Class A and Class C
|
Class R3
|
Class I
|
|
Eligibility and Minimum Initial Investment
|
$3,000 for all accounts except:
•
Roth IRA accounts.
•
Education Savings Accounts.
•
•
|
Available only through certain retirement plans.
No minimum.
|
Available only through fee-based programs and certain retirement plans, and to other limited categories of investors as described in the prospectus.
$100,000 for all accounts except:
•
•
|
Minimum
Additional Investment |
$100
|
No minimum.
|
No minimum.
|
Section 1
|
9
|
Class A
|
Class C
|
Class R3
|
Class R6
|
Class I
|
||||||
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Purchases
(as a percentage of offering price) |
4.25%
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|||||
Maximum Deferred Sales Charge (Load)
(as a percentage of the lesser of purchase price or redemption proceeds)
1
|
None
|
1.00%
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|||||
Maximum Sales Charge (Load) Imposed on Reinvested Dividends
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|||||
Exchange Fee
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
None
|
|||||
Annual Low Balance Account Fee (for accounts under $1,000)
2
|
$15
|
$15
|
None
|
None
|
$15
|
Class A
|
Class C
|
Class R3
|
Class R6
|
Class I
|
||||||||||||||||
Management Fees
|
0.54
|
%
|
0.54
|
%
|
0.54
|
%
|
0.54
|
%
|
0.54
|
%
|
||||||||||
Distribution and/or Service (12b-1) Fees
|
0.25
|
%
|
1.00
|
%
|
0.50
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
0.00
|
%
|
||||||||||
Other Expenses
|
0.18
|
%
|
0.18
|
%
|
0.18
|
%
|
0.09
|
%
|
0.18
|
%
|
||||||||||
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses
|
0.97
|
%
|
1.72
|
%
|
1.22
|
%
|
0.63
|
%
|
0.72
|
%
|
||||||||||
Fee Waivers and/or Expense Reimbursements
3
|
(0.13
|
)%
|
(0.13
|
)%
|
(0.13
|
)%
|
(0.13
|
)%
|
(0.13
|
)%
|
||||||||||
Total Annual Fund Operating Expenses After Fee Waivers and/or Expense Reimbursements
|
0.84
|
%
|
1.59
|
%
|
1.09
|
%
|
0.50
|
%
|
0.59
|
%
|
10
|
Section 1
|
Class A
|
Class C
|
Class R3
|
Class R6
|
Class I
|
||||||||||||||
1 Year
|
$
|
507
|
$
|
162
|
$
|
111
|
$
|
51
|
$
|
60
|
||||||||
3 Years
|
$
|
699
|
$
|
519
|
$
|
364
|
$
|
178
|
$
|
207
|
||||||||
5 Years
|
$
|
917
|
$
|
912
|
$
|
648
|
$
|
328
|
$
|
378
|
||||||||
10 Years
|
$
|
1,544
|
$
|
2,011
|
$
|
1,457
|
$
|
764
|
$
|
873
|
Section 1
|
11
|
12
|
Section 1
|
Section 1
|
13
|
14
|
Section 1
|
*
|
|
Section 1
|
15
|
Name
|
Title
|
Portfolio Manager of Fund Since
|
Douglas M. Baker, CFA
|
Managing Director
|
March 2016
|
Kevin R. Lorenz, CFA
|
Managing Director
|
March 2019
|
William Martin
*
|
Senior
Managing
Director
|
March 2019
|
Katherine Renfrew
|
Managing Director
|
March 2019
|
Nicholas W. Travaglino
|
Managing Director
|
March 2019
|
16
|
Section 1
|
Class A and Class C
|
Class R3
|
Class R6
|
Class I
|
|
Eligibility and Minimum Initial Investment
|
$3,000 for all accounts except:
•
Roth IRA accounts.
•
Education Savings Accounts.
•
•
|
Available only through certain retirement plans.
No minimum.
|
Available only to certain qualified retirement plans and other investors as described in the prospectus and through fee-based programs.
$1 million for all accounts except:
•
•
|
Available only through fee-based programs and certain retirement plans, and to other limited categories of investors as described in the prospectus.
$100,000 for all accounts except:
•
•
|
Minimum
Additional Investment |
$100
|
No minimum.
|
No minimum.
|
No minimum.
|
Section 1
|
17
|
Who Manages the Funds
|
18
|
Section 2
|
Section 2
|
19
|
Average Daily Net Assets
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund |
Nuveen
Strategic Income Fund |
|
For the first $125 million
|
0.4000%
|
0.3600%
|
|
For the next $125 million
|
0.3875%
|
0.3475%
|
|
For the next $250 million
|
0.3750%
|
0.3350%
|
|
For the next $500 million
|
0.3625%
|
0.3225%
|
|
For the next $1 billion
|
0.3500%
|
0.3100%
|
|
For the next $3 billion
|
0.3250%
|
0.2850%
|
|
For the next $5 billion
|
0.3000%
|
0.2600%
|
|
For net assets over $10 billion
|
0.2875%
|
0.2475%
|
Complex-Level
Fee Rate |
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
0.2000%
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
0.1978%
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
0.48%
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
0.41%
|
|
20
|
Section 2
|
Section 2
|
21
|
22
|
Section 2
|
Section 2
|
23
|
24
|
Section 2
|
Section 2
|
25
|
26
|
Section 2
|
|
Section 2
|
27
|
28
|
Section 2
|
Section 2
|
29
|
30
|
Section 2
|
Section 2
|
31
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
32
|
Section 2
|
Section 2
|
33
|
|
34
|
Section 2
|
Section 2
|
35
|
36
|
Section 2
|
Section 2
|
37
|
38
|
Section 2
|
Section 2
|
39
|
|
Amount of Purchase
|
Sales Charge as
% of Public Offering Price |
Sales Charge as
% of Net Amount Invested |
Maximum Financial Intermediary Commission as % of Public Offering Price
|
|||||
Less than $50,000
|
4.75
|
%
|
4.99
|
%
|
4.25
|
%
|
||
$50,000 but less than $100,000
|
4.50
|
4.71
|
4.00
|
|||||
$100,000 but less than $250,000
|
3.50
|
3.63
|
3.00
|
|||||
$250,000 but less than $500,000
|
2.50
|
2.56
|
2.25
|
|||||
$500,000 but less than $1,000,000
|
2.00
|
2.04
|
1.75
|
|||||
$1,000,000 and over*
|
—
|
—
|
1.00
|
40
|
Amount of Purchase
|
Sales Charge as
% of Public Offering Price |
Sales Charge as
% of Net Amount Invested |
Maximum Financial Intermediary Commission as % of Public Offering Price
|
|||||
Less than $50,000
|
4.25
|
%
|
4.44
|
%
|
3.75
|
%
|
||
$50,000 but less than $100,000
|
4.00
|
4.17
|
3.50
|
|||||
$100,000 but less than $250,000
|
3.50
|
3.63
|
3.00
|
|||||
$250,000 but less than $500,000
|
2.50
|
2.56
|
2.25
|
|||||
$500,000 but less than $1,000,000
|
2.00
|
2.04
|
1.75
|
|||||
$1,000,000 and over*
|
—
|
—
|
1.00
|
41
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
42
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
43
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
44
|
|
|
·
|
Rights of Accumulation.
|
|
·
|
Letter of Intent.
|
|
·
|
Purchases of $1,000,000 or more (although such purchases may be subject to a CDSC in certain circumstances, see “What Share Classes We Offer—Contingent Deferred Sales Charges” above).
|
|
·
|
Shares purchased through the reinvestment of Nuveen Mutual Fund dividends and capital gain distributions.
|
|
·
|
Shares purchased for accounts held directly with a Fund that do not have a financial intermediary of record.
|
|
·
|
Certain employer-sponsored retirement plans.
ESRPs
|
45
|
|
·
|
Employees of Nuveen, LLC and its affiliates.
|
|
·
|
Current and former trustees/directors of the Nuveen Funds.
|
|
·
|
Financial intermediary personnel.
|
|
·
|
Certain trust departments.
|
|
·
|
Additional categories of investors.
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
46
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
47
|
|
·
|
By wire.
|
|
·
|
By mail.
|
|
·
|
On-line.
|
|
·
|
By telephone.
|
48
|
|
|
·
|
From your bank account.
|
|
·
|
From your paycheck.
|
|
·
|
Systematic exchanging.
|
49
|
|
|
·
|
By mail.
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
50
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
On-line.
|
|
·
|
By telephone.
|
51
|
An Important Note About Telephone Transactions
Although Nuveen Funds has certain safeguards and procedures to confirm the identity of callers, it will not be liable for losses resulting from following telephone instructions it reasonably believes to be genuine.
Also, you should verify your trade confirmations immediately upon receipt.
|
52
|
Dividends, Distributions and Taxes
|
Section 4
|
53
|
54
|
Section 4
|
|
Section 4
|
55
|
|
56
|
Section 4
|
Frequent Trading
|
Section 4
|
57
|
58
|
Section 4
|
|
Section 4
|
59
|
Class (Commencement Date)
|
Investment Operations
|
|
Less Distributions
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios of
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios of
|
Investment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
|
Net
|
|
From
|
From
|
Ending
|
Expenses
|
Income (Loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment
|
Realized/
|
|
Net
|
Accumulated
|
Return
|
Net
|
to Average
|
to Average
|
Portfolio
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended
|
Beginning
|
Income
|
Unrealized
|
|
Investment
|
Net Realized
|
of
|
Ending
|
Total
|
Assets
|
Net
|
Net
|
Turnover
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30:
|
NAV
|
(Loss)(a)
|
Gain (Loss)
|
Total
|
|
Income
|
Gains
|
Capital
|
Total
|
NAV
|
Return(b)
|
(000)
|
Assets(c)
|
Assets(c)
|
Rate(d)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A (8/01)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020
|
$
|
7.44
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
$
|
(0.75
|
)
|
$
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.35
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(0.03
|
)
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
$
|
6.69
|
|
(5.15
|
)%
|
$
|
82,545
|
1.00
|
%
|
5.31
|
%
|
80
|
%
|
|
2019
|
|
7.51
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.49
|
)
|
|
7.44
|
|
5.86
|
|
|
151,673
|
1.00
|
|
6.19
|
|
113
|
|
|
2018
|
|
7.80
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
7.51
|
|
3.16
|
|
|
126,376
|
1.00
|
|
6.70
|
|
126
|
|
|
2017
|
|
7.22
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
1.11
|
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
7.80
|
|
15.75
|
|
|
136,977
|
1.01
|
|
7.03
|
|
155
|
|
|
2016
|
|
8.23
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
(1.05
|
)
|
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
7.22
|
|
5.48
|
|
|
114,537
|
1.03
|
|
7.99
|
|
91
|
|
|
Class C (8/01)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020
|
|
7.43
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
(0.74
|
)
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
|
(0.30
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
6.69
|
|
(5.75
|
)
|
|
22,612
|
1.75
|
|
4.58
|
|
80
|
|
|
2019
|
|
7.50
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
7.43
|
|
5.04
|
|
|
35,655
|
1.75
|
|
5.46
|
|
113
|
|
|
2018
|
|
7.79
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
0.18
|
|
|
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
7.50
|
|
2.37
|
|
|
41,121
|
1.75
|
|
6.00
|
|
126
|
|
|
2017
|
|
7.21
|
|
|
0.49
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
1.06
|
|
|
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
7.79
|
|
14.93
|
|
|
47,698
|
1.76
|
|
6.32
|
|
155
|
|
|
2016
|
|
8.22
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
(1.07
|
)
|
|
(0.54
|
)
|
|
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
7.21
|
|
(6.27
|
)
|
|
41,663
|
1.79
|
|
7.26
|
|
91
|
|
|
Class R3 (9/01)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020
|
|
7.60
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
|
(0.34
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
6.84
|
|
(5.33
|
)
|
|
242
|
1.25
|
|
5.09
|
|
80
|
|
|
2019
|
|
7.67
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
7.60
|
|
5.56
|
|
|
298
|
1.26
|
|
5.96
|
|
113
|
|
|
2018
|
|
7.96
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
7.67
|
|
2.94
|
|
|
473
|
1.25
|
|
6.52
|
|
126
|
|
|
2017
|
|
7.37
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
1.12
|
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
7.96
|
|
15.46
|
|
|
756
|
1.26
|
|
6.81
|
|
155
|
|
|
2016
|
|
8.40
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
(1.08
|
)
|
|
(0.51
|
)
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.52
|
)
|
|
7.37
|
|
(5.76
|
)
|
|
834
|
1.29
|
|
7.78
|
|
91
|
|
|
Class I (8/01)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020
|
|
7.47
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
(0.76
|
)
|
|
(0.36
|
)
|
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
(0.40
|
)
|
|
6.71
|
|
(5.03
|
)
|
|
80,728
|
0.75
|
|
5.47
|
|
80
|
|
|
2019
|
|
7.54
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
|
(0.51
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.51
|
)
|
|
7.47
|
|
6.10
|
|
|
101,560
|
0.75
|
|
6.45
|
|
113
|
|
|
2018
|
|
7.82
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
0.27
|
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
7.54
|
|
3.52
|
|
|
139,777
|
0.75
|
|
6.95
|
|
126
|
|
|
2017
|
|
7.24
|
|
|
0.56
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
1.13
|
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
7.82
|
|
15.97
|
|
|
200,310
|
0.76
|
|
7.31
|
|
155
|
|
|
2016
|
|
8.26
|
|
|
0.60
|
|
|
(1.07
|
)
|
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.55
|
)
|
|
7.24
|
|
(5.21
|
)
|
|
208,009
|
0.78
|
|
8.12
|
|
91
|
|
|
(a)
|
Per share Net Investment Income (Loss) is calculated using the average daily shares method.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b)
|
Total return is the combination of changes in NAV without any sales charge, reinvested dividend income at NAV and reinvested capital gains distributions at NAV, if any. Total returns are not annualized.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(c)
|
After fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement from Nuveen Fund Advisors, where applicable. For the period October 31, 2014 through June 29, 2016, the Adviser did not reimburse the Fund for any fees and expenses.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(d)
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate is calculated based on the lesser of long-term purchases or sales divided by the average long-term market value during the period.
|
60
|
Class (Commencement Date)
|
Investment Operations
|
|
Less Distributions
|
Ratios/Supplemental Data
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios of
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Net
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ratios of
|
Investment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
|
Net
|
|
From
|
From
|
Ending
|
Expenses
|
Income (Loss)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment
|
Realized/
|
|
Net
|
Accumulated
|
Return
|
Net
|
to Average
|
to Average
|
Portfolio
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended
|
Beginning
|
Income
|
Unrealized
|
|
Investment
|
Net Realized
|
of
|
Ending
|
Total
|
Assets
|
Net
|
Net
|
Turnover
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30:
|
NAV
|
(Loss)(a)
|
Gain (Loss)
|
Total
|
|
Income
|
Gains
|
Capital
|
Total
|
NAV
|
Return(b)
|
(000)
|
Assets(c)
|
Assets(c)
|
Rate(d)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A (2/00)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020
|
$
|
10.60
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
$
|
0.48
|
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(0.39
|
)
|
$
|
10.69
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
$
|
101,886
|
0.84
|
%
|
3.42
|
%
|
62
|
%
|
|
2019
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
0.78
|
|
|
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.35
|
)
|
|
10.60
|
|
7.89
|
|
|
87,084
|
0.84
|
|
3.90
|
|
54
|
|
|
2018
|
|
10.65
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
10.17
|
|
(0.70
|
)
|
|
106,805
|
0.83
|
|
3.41
|
|
124
|
|
|
2017
|
|
10.52
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
0.66
|
|
|
|
(0.29
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
10.65
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
137,072
|
0.83
|
|
4.12
|
|
135
|
|
|
2016
|
|
10.97
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
10.52
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
187,052
|
0.83
|
|
4.80
|
|
56
|
|
|
Class C (2/00)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020
|
|
10.55
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.31
|
)
|
|
10.64
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
37,285
|
1.59
|
|
2.71
|
|
62
|
|
|
2019
|
|
10.12
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.28
|
)
|
|
10.55
|
|
7.11
|
|
|
42,024
|
1.59
|
|
3.15
|
|
54
|
|
|
2018
|
|
10.59
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
(0.14
|
)
|
|
|
(0.13
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
10.12
|
|
(1.40
|
)
|
|
59,612
|
1.58
|
|
2.66
|
|
124
|
|
|
2017
|
|
10.46
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
(0.21
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
10.59
|
|
5.63
|
|
|
76,513
|
1.58
|
|
3.35
|
|
135
|
|
|
2016
|
|
10.90
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.45
|
)
|
|
10.46
|
|
0.20
|
|
|
89,173
|
1.58
|
|
4.06
|
|
56
|
|
|
Class R3 (9/01)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020
|
|
10.64
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.37
|
)
|
|
10.73
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
3,033
|
1.09
|
|
3.22
|
|
62
|
|
|
2019
|
|
10.21
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
0.76
|
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.33
|
)
|
|
10.64
|
|
7.61
|
|
|
2,792
|
1.09
|
|
3.64
|
|
54
|
|
|
2018
|
|
10.69
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
(0.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
(0.39
|
)
|
|
10.21
|
|
(0.92
|
)
|
|
5,869
|
1.08
|
|
3.16
|
|
124
|
|
|
2017
|
|
10.56
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
0.64
|
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
(0.51
|
)
|
|
10.69
|
|
6.17
|
|
|
7,320
|
1.08
|
|
3.83
|
|
135
|
|
|
2016
|
|
11.01
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
0.06
|
|
|
|
(0.51
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.51
|
)
|
|
10.56
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
7,647
|
1.08
|
|
4.54
|
|
56
|
|
|
Class R6 (1/15)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020
|
|
10.64
|
|
|
0.40
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.43
|
)
|
|
10.73
|
|
4.96
|
|
|
59,099
|
0.50
|
|
3.77
|
|
62
|
|
|
2019
|
|
10.20
|
|
|
0.44
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
10.64
|
|
8.24
|
|
|
50,127
|
0.50
|
|
4.26
|
|
54
|
|
|
2018
|
|
10.67
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
(0.03
|
)
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
10.20
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
46,588
|
0.50
|
|
3.75
|
|
124
|
|
|
2017
|
|
10.52
|
|
|
0.48
|
|
|
0.23
|
|
|
0.71
|
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
10.67
|
|
6.86
|
|
|
8,995
|
0.51
|
|
4.45
|
|
135
|
|
|
2016
|
|
10.96
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
(0.41
|
)
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
10.52
|
|
1.28
|
|
|
33,372
|
0.50
|
|
5.17
|
|
56
|
|
|
Class I (2/00)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2020
|
|
10.60
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
0.51
|
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
10.69
|
|
4.86
|
|
|
395,502
|
0.59
|
|
3.71
|
|
62
|
|
|
2019
|
|
10.17
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
10.60
|
|
8.15
|
|
|
400,059
|
0.59
|
|
4.15
|
|
54
|
|
|
2018
|
|
10.65
|
|
|
0.38
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
(0.44
|
)
|
|
10.17
|
|
(0.47
|
)
|
|
493,098
|
0.58
|
|
3.67
|
|
124
|
|
|
2017
|
|
10.51
|
|
|
0.46
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
(0.32
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.24
|
)
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
10.65
|
|
6.77
|
|
|
540,368
|
0.58
|
|
4.32
|
|
135
|
|
|
2016
|
|
10.96
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
(0.42
|
)
|
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(0.56
|
)
|
|
10.51
|
|
1.19
|
|
|
475,536
|
0.58
|
|
5.05
|
|
56
|
|
|
(a)
|
Per share Net Investment Income (Loss) is calculated using the average daily shares method.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(b)
|
Total return is the combination of changes in NAV without any sales charge, reinvested dividend income at NAV and reinvested capital gains distributions at NAV, if any. Total returns are not annualized.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(c)
|
After fee waiver and/or expense reimbursement from Nuveen Fund Advisors, where applicable.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(d)
|
Portfolio Turnover Rate is calculated based on the lesser of long-term purchases or sales divided by the average long-term market value during the period.
|
61
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
Shares sold due to death or disability of the shareholder
|
|
·
|
Shares sold as part of a systematic withdrawal plan as described in this prospectus
|
|
·
|
Shares bought due to returns of excess contributions from an IRA account
|
|
·
|
Shares sold as part of a required minimum distribution for IRA and retirement accounts due to the shareholder reaching the qualified age based on applicable IRS regulations.
|
|
·
|
Shares sold to pay Baird fees but only if the transaction is initiated by Baird
|
|
·
|
Shares acquired through a right of reinstatement
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
th
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
Shares sold as part of a required minimum distribution for IRA and retirement accounts if the redemption is taken in or after the year the shareholder reaches
qualified age based on applicable IRS regulations
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
o
|
$250 initial purchase minimum
|
|
o
|
$50 subsequent purchase minimum
|
|
·
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
o
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
Shares acquired through a right of reinstatement.
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
ROA
|
|
·
|
Letters of intent which allow for breakpoint discounts based on anticipated purchases of Nuveen-sponsored mutual funds, over a 13-month time period. Eligible Nuveen-sponsored mutual fund assets not held at Janney Montgomery Scott may be included in the calculation of letters of intent only if the shareholder notifies his or her financial advisor about such assets.
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
ROA
|
|
·
|
“LOI”
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
Shares acquired through a Right of Reinstatement.
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
MPR-FINC-1020P
|
October 28, 2020
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
(
formerly Nuveen High Income Bond Fund
|
|||
Ticker Symbols: Class A—FJSIX, Class C—FCSIX, Class R3—FANSX, Class I—FJSYX
|
|||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
|||
Ticker Symbols: Class A—FCDDX, Class C—FCBCX, Class R3—FABSX, Class R6—FSFRX, Class I—FCBYX
|
|
Page
|
|
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
|
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
S-
|
||
A-
|
||
Appendix B – ISS United States Proxy Voting Guidelines
|
B-
|
1
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
|
·
|
Fixed Rate Preferred Securities
|
·
|
Fixed-to-Fixed Preferred Securities
|
·
|
Fixed-to-Floating Preferred Securities
|
·
|
Floating-Rate Preferred Securities
|
Name, Business Address
and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held
with NIF |
Term of Office
and Length of Time Served with NIF |
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past Five Years |
Number of
Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director |
Other
Directorships Held by Director During Past Five Years |
|
Independent Directors*:
|
||||||
Jack B. Evans
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1948 |
Director
|
Term—Indefinite**
Length of Service— Since 2011 |
Chairman (since 2019), formerly, President (1996-2019), The Hall-Perrine Foundation, a private philanthropic corporation; Director, Public Member, American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (since 2015); Life Trustee of Coe College and the Iowa College Foundation; formerly, Director, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; formerly, President and Chief Operating Officer, SCI Financial Group, Inc., a regional financial services firm; formerly, Member and President Pro Tem of the Board of Regents for the State of Iowa University System; formerly, Director, The Gazette Company.
|
155
|
Director and Chairman, United Fire Group, a publicly held company; formerly, Director, Alliant Energy.
|
|
William C. Hunter
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1948 |
Director
|
Term—Indefinite**
Length of Service— Since 2011 |
Dean Emeritus, formerly, Dean (2006-2012), Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa; past Director (2005-2015) and past President (2010-2014) of Beta Gamma Sigma, Inc., The International Business Honor Society; formerly, Director (1997-2007), Credit Research Center at Georgetown University; formerly, Dean and Distinguished Professor of Finance, School of Business at the University of Connecticut (2003-2006); previously, Senior Vice President and Director of Research at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (1995-2003).
|
155
|
Director (since 2009) of Wellmark, Inc.; formerly, Director (2004-2018) of Xerox Corporation.
|
Name, Business Address
and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held
with NIF |
Term of Office
and Length of Time Served with NIF |
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past Five Years |
Number of
Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director |
Other
Directorships Held by Director During Past Five Years |
Albin F. Moschner
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1952 |
Director
|
Term—Indefinite**
Length of Service— Since 2016 |
Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Northcroft Partners, LLC, a management consulting firm (since 2012); previously, held positions at Leap Wireless International, Inc., including Consultant (2011-2012), Chief Operating Officer (2008-2011) and Chief Marketing Officer (2004-2008); formerly, President, Verizon Card Services division of Verizon Communications, Inc. (2000-2003); formerly, President, One Point Services at One Point Communications (1999-2000); formerly, Vice Chairman of the Board, Diba, Incorporated (1996-1997); formerly, various executive positions (1991-1996) and Chief Executive Officer (1995-1996) of Zenith Electronics Corporation.
|
155
|
Formerly, Chairman (2019) and Director (2012-2019), USA Technologies, Inc., a provider of solutions and services to facilitate electronic payment transactions; formerly, Director, Wintrust Financial Corporation (1996-2016).
|
John K. Nelson
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1962 |
Director
|
Term—Indefinite**
Length of Service— Since 2013 |
Member of Board of Directors of Core12 LLC (since 2008), a private firm which develops branding, marketing and communications strategies for clients; served The President's Council of Fordham University (2010-2019) and previously a Director of the Curran Center for Catholic American Studies (2009-2018); formerly, senior external advisor to the Financial Services practice of Deloitte Consulting LLP (2012-2014); former Chair of the Board of Trustees of Marian University (2010-2014 as trustee, 2011-2014 as Chair); formerly Chief Executive Officer of ABN AMRO Bank N.V., North America, and Global Head of the Financial Markets Division (2007-2008), with various executive leadership roles in ABN AMRO Bank N.V. between 1996 and 2007.
|
155
|
None
|
Judith M. Stockdale
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1947 |
Director
|
Term—Indefinite**
Length of Service— Since 2011 |
Board Member of the Land Trust Alliance (since 2013); formerly, Board Member of the U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities (2013-12/2019); formerly, Executive Director (1994-2012), Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation; prior thereto, Executive Director, Great Lakes Protection Fund (1990-1994).
|
155
|
None
|
Name, Business Address
and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held
with NIF |
Term of Office
and Length of Time Served with NIF |
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past Five Years |
Number of
Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director |
Other
Directorships Held by Director During Past Five Years |
Carole E. Stone
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1947 |
Director
|
Term—Indefinite**
Length of Service— Since 2011 |
Former Director, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (2006-2017) and C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (2009-2017); formerly, Commissioner, New York State Commission on Public Authority Reform (2005-2010).
|
155
|
Formerly, Director (2010-2020), Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (formerly, CBOE Holdings, Inc.).
|
Terence J. Toth
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1959 |
Chair of
the Board and Director |
Term—Indefinite**
Length of Service— Since 2011 |
Formerly, Co-Founding Partner, Promus Capital (2008-2017); Director, Quality Control Corporation (since 2012); formerly, Director, Fulcrum IT Service LLC (2010-2019); formerly, Director, LogicMark LLC (2012-2016); formerly, Director, Legal & General Investment Management America, Inc. (2008-2013); formerly, CEO and President, Northern Trust Global Investments (2004-2007); Executive Vice President, Quantitative Management & Securities Lending (2000-2004); prior thereto, various positions with Northern Trust Company (since 1994); Member, Catalyst Schools of Chicago Board (since 2008) and Mather Foundation Board (since 2012) and is Chair of its Investment Committee; formerly, Member, Chicago Fellowship Board (2005-2016); formerly, Member, Northern Trust Mutual Funds Board (2005-2007), Northern Trust Global Investments Board (2004-2007), Northern Trust Japan Board (2004-2007), Northern Trust Securities Inc. Board (2003-2007) and Northern Trust Hong Kong Board (1997-2004).
|
155
|
None
|
Name, Business Address
and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held
with NIF |
Term of Office
and Length of Time Served with NIF |
Principal Occupation(s)
During Past Five Years |
Number of
Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen by Director |
Other
Directorships Held by Director During Past Five Years |
Margaret L. Wolff
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1955 |
Director
|
Term—Indefinite**
Length of Service— Since 2016 |
Formerly, Of Counsel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP (Mergers & Acquisitions Group) (2005-2014); Member of the Board of Trustees of New York-Presbyterian Hospital (since 2005); Member (since 2004) and Chair (since 2015) of the Board of Trustees of The John A. Hartford Foundation (a philanthropy dedicated to improving the care of older adults); formerly, Member (2005-2015) and Vice Chair (2011-2015) of the Board of Trustees of Mt. Holyoke College.
|
155
|
Formerly, Member of the Board of Directors (2013-2017) of Travelers Insurance Company of Canada and The Dominion of Canada General Insurance Company (each, a part of Travelers Canada, the Canadian operation of The Travelers Companies, Inc.).
|
Robert L. Young
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1963 |
Director
|
Term—Indefinite**
Length of Service— Since 2017 |
Formerly, Chief Operating Officer and Director, J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (2010-2016); formerly, President and Principal Executive Officer (2013-2016), and Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer (2005-2010), of J.P. Morgan Funds; formerly, Director and various officer positions for J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (formerly, JPMorgan Funds Management, Inc. and formerly, One Group Administrative Services) and JPMorgan Distribution Services, Inc. (formerly, One Group Dealer Services, Inc.) (1999-2017).
|
155
|
None
|
*
|
Matthew Thornton III has been nominated for election to the Board of Directors of the Funds and the boards of all other funds in the Nuveen complex, each such appointment effective as of November 16, 2020. If Mr. Thornton is elected to the board of each such fund for which he has been nominated and assuming his appointments become effective, Mr. Thornton will oversee all the portfolios in the Nuveen fund complex. Mr. Thornton’s principal occupation and other directorships during the past five years are as follows:
|
Name, Business Address
and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held
with NIF |
Term of Office and Length of Time
Served with NIF |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years
|
Officers of NIF:
|
|||
Mark J. Czarniecki
901 Marquette Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55402 1979 |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2013 |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary of Nuveen Securities, LLC (since 2016) and Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (since 2017); Vice President and Associate General Counsel of Nuveen (since 2013).
|
Diana R. Gonzalez
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1978 |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2017 |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (since 2017); Vice President and Associate General Counsel of Nuveen (since 2017); Associate General Counsel of Jackson National Asset Management (2012-2017).
|
Nathaniel T. Jones
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1979 |
Vice President and Treasurer
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2016 |
Managing Director (since 2017), formerly, Senior Vice President (2016-2017), formerly, Vice President (2011-2016) of Nuveen; Managing Director (since 2015) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Chartered Financial Analyst.
|
Walter M. Kelly
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1970 |
Vice President and Chief Compliance Officer
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2011 |
Managing Director (since 2017), formerly, Senior Vice President (2008-2017) of Nuveen.
|
Tina M. Lazar
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1961 |
Vice President
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2011 |
Managing Director (since 2017), formerly, Senior Vice President (2014-2017) of Nuveen Securities, LLC.
|
Brian J. Lockhart
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1974 |
Vice President
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2019 |
Managing Director (since 2019) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Managing Director (since 2017), formerly, Vice President (2010-2017) of Nuveen; Head of Investment Oversight (since 2017), formerly, Team Leader of Manager Oversight (2015-2017); Chartered Financial Analyst and Certified Financial Risk Manager.
|
Jacques M. Longerstaey
8500 Andrew Carnegie Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28262 1963 |
Vice President
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2019 |
Senior Managing Director, Chief Risk Officer, Nuveen, LLC (since May 2019); Senior Managing Director (since May 2019) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; formerly, Chief Investment and Model Risk Officer, Wealth & Investment Management Division, Wells Fargo Bank (NA) (from 2013–2019).
|
Kevin J. McCarthy
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1966 |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2011 |
Senior Managing Director (since 2017) and Secretary and General Counsel (since 2016) of Nuveen Investments, Inc., formerly, Executive Vice President (2016-2017), Managing Director and Assistant Secretary (2008-2016); Senior Managing Director (since 2017) and Assistant Secretary (since 2008) of Nuveen Securities, LLC, formerly, Executive Vice President (2016-2017) and Managing Director (2008-2016); Senior Managing Director (since 2017), Secretary (since 2016) and Co-General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC, formerly, Executive Vice President (2016-2017), Managing Director (2008-2016) and Assistant Secretary (2007-2016); Senior Managing Director (since 2017), Secretary (since 2016) and Associate General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC, formerly, Executive Vice President (2016-2017) and Managing Director and Assistant Secretary (2011-2016); Vice President (since 2007) and Secretary (since 2016), formerly, Assistant Secretary, of NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, Symphony Asset Management LLC, Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC, and Winslow Capital Management, LLC (since 2010); Senior Managing Director (since 2017) and Secretary (since 2016) of Nuveen Alternative Investments, LLC.
|
Name, Business Address
and Year of Birth |
Position(s) Held
with NIF |
Term of Office and Length of Time
Served with NIF |
Principal Occupation(s) During Past Five Years
|
Jon Scott Meissner
8500 Andrew Carnegie Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28262 1973 |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2019 |
Managing Director of Mutual Fund Tax and Financial Reporting groups at Nuveen (since 2017); Managing Director (since 2019) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Senior Director of Teachers Advisors, LLC and TIAA-CREF Investment Management, LLC (since 2016); Senior Director (since 2015) Mutual Fund Taxation to the TIAA-CREF Funds, the TIAA-CREF Life Funds, the TIAA Separate Account VA-1 and the CREF Accounts; has held various positions with TIAA since 2004.
|
Deann D. Morgan
100 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 1969 |
Vice President
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2020 |
Executive Vice President, Global Head of Product at Nuveen (since November 2019); Co-Chief Executive Officer of Nuveen Securities, LLC (since March 2020); Managing Member MDR Collaboratory LLC (since 2018); Managing Director, Head of Wealth Management Product Structuring & COO Multi Asset Investing, The Blackstone Group (2013-2017).
|
Christopher M. Rohrbacher
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1971 |
Vice President and Secretary
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2011 |
Managing Director (since 2017), formerly, Senior Vice President (2016-2017), Co-General Counsel (since 2019) and Assistant Secretary (since 2016) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Managing Director (since 2017) of Nuveen Securities, LLC; Managing Director (since 2017), formerly, Senior Vice President (2012-2017) and Associate General Counsel (since 2016), formerly, Assistant General Counsel (2008-2016) of Nuveen.
|
William A. Siffermann
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1975 |
Vice President
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2017 |
Managing Director (since 2017), formerly Senior Vice President (2016-2017) and Vice President (2011-2016) of Nuveen.
|
Christopher E. Stickrod
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1976 |
Chief Administrative Officer
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2020 |
Senior Managing Director (since 2017) and Head of Advisory Product (since 2020), formerly, Managing Director (2016-2017) and Senior Vice President (2013-2016) of Nuveen, LLC; Senior Managing Director of Nuveen Securities, LLC (since 2018) and of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (since 2019).
|
E. Scott Wickerham
TIAA 730 Third Avenue New York, NY 10017 1973 |
Vice President and Controller
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2019 |
Senior Managing Director, Head of Fund Administration at Nuveen, LLC (since 2019), formerly, Managing Director; Senior Managing Director (since 2019), Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Treasurer (since 2017) to the TIAA-CREF Funds, the TIAA-CREF Life Funds, the TIAA Separate Account VA-1 and the Treasurer (since 2017) to the CREF Accounts; Senior Director, TIAA-CREF Fund Administration (2014-2015); has held various positions with TIAA since 2006.
|
Gifford R. Zimmerman
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 1956 |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
|
Term—Until
August 2020 Length of Service— Since 2011 |
Managing Director (since 2002) and Assistant Secretary of Nuveen Securities, LLC; Managing Director (since 2002), Assistant Secretary (since 1997) and Co-General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Managing Director, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (since 2011); Managing Director (since 2004) and Assistant Secretary (since 1994) of Nuveen Investments, Inc.; Vice President and Assistant Secretary of NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC (since 2002); Managing Director and Assistant Secretary (since 2003) of Symphony Asset Management LLC; Vice President and Assistant Secretary of Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC (since 2006) and Winslow Capital Management, LLC (since 2010); Chartered Financial Analyst.
|
Name of Director
|
Aggregate
Compensation From Funds |
Amount of Total
Compensation that Has Been Deferred |
Total Compensation
From Nuveen Funds Paid to Director |
|||||||||||||
Jack B. Evans
|
$
|
2,229
|
$
|
208
|
$
|
382,140
|
||||||||||
William C. Hunter
|
2,531
|
—
|
401,250
|
|||||||||||||
Albin F. Moschner
|
2,079
|
—
|
360,450
|
|||||||||||||
John K. Nelson
|
2,394
|
—
|
410,500
|
|||||||||||||
Judith M. Stockdale
|
2,177
|
489
|
374,609
|
|||||||||||||
Carole E. Stone
|
2,289
|
1,046
|
392,712
|
|||||||||||||
Terence J. Toth
|
2,725
|
—
|
467,700
|
|||||||||||||
Margaret L. Wolff
|
2,278
|
752
|
361,392
|
|||||||||||||
Robert L. Young
|
2,449
|
2,449
|
390,679
|
Directors
|
||||||||||||||||||
Evans
|
Hunter
|
Moschner
|
Nelson
|
Stockdale
|
Stone
|
Toth
|
Wolff
|
Young
|
||||||||||
Aggregate Holdings –
Fund Complex |
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
Over $100,000
|
|||||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
|||||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
$0
|
Over
$100,000 |
$0
|
$0
|
Complex-Level Asset
|
Effective Rate at
|
|
Breakpoint Level*
|
Breakpoint Level
|
|
$55 billion
|
0.2000%
|
|
$56 billion
|
0.1996%
|
|
$57 billion
|
0.1989%
|
|
$60 billion
|
0.1961%
|
|
$63 billion
|
0.1931%
|
|
$66 billion
|
0.1900%
|
|
$71 billion
|
0.1851%
|
|
$76 billion
|
0.1806%
|
|
$80 billion
|
0.1773%
|
|
$91 billion
|
0.1691%
|
|
$125 billion
|
0.1599%
|
|
$200 billion
|
0.1505%
|
|
$250 billion
|
0.1469%
|
|
$300 billion
|
0.1445%
|
Complex-Level
|
||
Fund
|
Fee Rate
|
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
0.2000%
|
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
0.1978%
|
Management Fees Paid to the
Adviser Net of Fee Waivers and Expense Reimbursements |
Fee Waivers and Expense
Reimbursements from the Adviser |
||||||||||||||||
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2018 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2019 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2020 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2018 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2019 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2020 |
||||||||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
$1,887,524
|
$1,667,799
|
$1,101,511
|
$140,655
|
$ 35,376
|
$268,945
|
|||||||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
3,329,268
|
2,603,994
|
2,555,715
|
790,284
|
730,332
|
833,082
|
Name
|
Fund
|
Anders Persson, CFA
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
Jean C. Lin, CFA
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
William Martin
*
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
|
Karina Bubeck, CFA
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
Aashh Parekh, CFA
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
Brenda A. Langenfeld, CFA
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
Douglas M. Baker, CFA
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
Kevin R. Lorenz, CFA
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
Katherine Renfrew
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
Nicholas W. Travaglino
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
Portfolio Manager
|
Type of Account Managed
|
Number of Accounts
|
Assets
|
Number of Accounts with Performance-Based Fees
|
Assets of Accounts with Performance-Based Fees
|
|||||||
Anders Persson
*
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
4
|
$
|
1.3 billion
|
0
|
$
|
0
|
|||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Other Accounts
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Jean C. Lin
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
3
|
5.6 billion
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
1
|
29.1 million
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Other Accounts
|
6
|
1.0 billion
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
William Martin
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
1
|
5.0 billion
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Other Accounts
|
1
|
52.0 million
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Karina Bubeck
*
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Other Accounts
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Aashh Parekh
*
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
1
|
148.3 million
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Other Accounts
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Brenda A. Langenfeld
*
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
7
|
8.7 billion
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
1
|
30.2 million
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Other Accounts
|
883
|
2.0 billion
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Doug M. Baker
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
5
|
6.0 billion
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Other Accounts
|
858
|
1.0 billion
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Kevin R. Lorenz
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
7
|
9.9 billion
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Other Accounts
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Katherine Renfrew
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
2
|
691.4 million
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
1
|
51.0 million
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Other Accounts
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Nicholas W. Travaglino
|
Registered Investment Companies
|
2
|
3.4 billion
|
0
|
0
|
|||||||
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
||||||||
Other Accounts
|
1
|
361.9 million
|
0
|
0
|
A
|
- $0
|
|||
B
|
- $1 - $10,000
|
|||
C
|
- $10,001 - $50,000
|
|||
D
|
- $50,001 - $100,000
|
|||
E
|
- $100,001 - $500,000
|
|||
F
|
- $500,001 - $1,000,000
|
|||
G
|
- More than $1 million
|
Portfolio Manager
|
Fund
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities Beneficially Owned in Fund Managed
|
||
Anders Persson
*
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
A
|
||
Jean C. Lin
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
A
|
||
William Martin
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
A
|
||
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
E
|
||
Karina Bubeck
*
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
A
|
||
Aashh Parekh
*
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
A
|
||
Brenda A. Langenfeld
*
|
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
A
|
||
Douglas M. Baker
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
C
|
||
Kevin R. Lorenz
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
A
|
||
Katherine Renfrew
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
A
|
||
Nicholas W. Travaglino
|
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
C
|
Nuveen
Credit Income Fund |
Nuveen
Strategic Income Fund |
|||||||
Gross income from securities
lending activities |
$
|
241,503
|
$
|
165,651
|
||||
Fees and/or compensation paid by each Fund for securities lending activities and related services:
|
||||||||
Fees paid to Securities Lending Agent from a revenue split
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Fees paid for any cash collateral management service (including fees deducted from a pooled cash collateral reinvestment vehicle) that are not included in the revenue split
|
(17,253
|
)
|
(12,329
|
)
|
||||
Administrative fees not included in the revenue split
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Indemnification fees not included in the revenue split
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Rebate (paid to borrower)
|
(158,616
|
)
|
(98,882
|
)
|
||||
Other fees not included in the revenue split
|
—
|
—
|
||||||
Aggregate fees/compensation for securities lending activities
|
(175,869
|
)
|
(111,211
|
)
|
||||
Net income from securities lending activities
|
65,634
|
54,440
|
Aggregate Brokerage Commissions Paid by the Funds
|
||||||||||||||
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2018 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2019 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2020 |
|||||||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
$
|
12,993
|
$
|
15,108
|
$
|
2,995
|
||||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
91,617
|
35,799
|
14,327
|
Fund
|
Broker/Dealer
|
Issuer
|
Aggregate Fund Holdings of Broker/Dealer
or Parent (as of June 30, 2020) |
|||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
Citigroup Global Markets
|
Citigroup, Inc.
|
$
|
—
|
||||||
Credit Suisse
|
Credit Suisse Group AG
|
779,183
|
||||||||
Deutsche Bank Trust Co.
|
Deutsche Bank AG
|
—
|
||||||||
Jefferies & Company Inc.
|
Jefferies Finance LLC
|
1,519,625
|
||||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
Bank of America
|
Banc of America Commercial Mortgage Trust
|
1,125,328
|
|||||||
Bank of America Corp
|
11,530,136
|
|||||||||
Barclays
|
Barclays PLC
|
5,138,475
|
||||||||
Citigroup Global Markets
|
Citibank Credit Card Issuance Trust
|
1,230,609
|
||||||||
Citigroup Commercial Mortgage Trust
|
6,861,070
|
|||||||||
Citigroup Inc.
|
9,931,382
|
|||||||||
Credit Suisse
|
Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp
|
82,129
|
||||||||
Credit Suisse Group AG
|
4,181,000
|
|||||||||
Goldman Sachs & Co.
|
Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
|
12,693,580
|
||||||||
GS Mortgage-Backed Securities Corp Trust
|
776,178
|
|||||||||
GS Mortgage Securities Trust
|
2,942,663
|
|||||||||
JPMorgan Chase
|
Bear Stearns Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust
|
218,571
|
||||||||
JPMBB Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust
|
184,570
|
|||||||||
JPMCC Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust
|
1,687,507
|
|||||||||
JP Morgan Alternative Loan Trust
|
378,872
|
|||||||||
JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust
|
362,021
|
|||||||||
JPMorgan Chase & Co
|
8,677,775
|
|||||||||
JP Morgan Mortgage Trust
|
4,622,593
|
|||||||||
Washington Mutual MSC Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series
|
94,699
|
|||||||||
Morgan Stanley & Co.
|
Morgan Stanley
|
5,216,889
|
||||||||
Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc Trust
|
279,035
|
|||||||||
Wells Fargo Bank
|
Wachovia Capital Trust III
|
—
|
||||||||
Wachovia Mortgage Loan Trust
|
93,997
|
|||||||||
Wells Fargo & Co
|
3,522,688
|
|||||||||
Wells Fargo Mortgage Backed Securities
|
—
|
|||||||||
WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust
|
2,912,664
|
Name of Fund and Class
|
Name and Address of Owner
|
Percentage of
Ownership |
||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
Class A Shares |
National Financial Services LLC For the Exclusive Benefit of our Customers Attn Mutual Fund Dept 4
th
499 Washington Blvd Jersey City NJ 07310-1995 |
13.83% |
||||
|
Name of Fund and Class
|
Name and Address of Owner
|
Percentage of
Ownership |
||||
Wells Fargo Clearing Services LLC
Special Custody Acct for the Exclusive Benefit of Customer 2801 Market St Saint Louis MO 63103-2523 |
9.89%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Pershing LLC
1 Pershing Plz Jersey City NJ 07399-0001 |
9.53%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Raymond James
Omnibus for Mutual Funds House Acct Attn: Courtney Waller 880 Carillon Parkway St Petersburg FL 33716-1102 |
7.87%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Charles Schwab & Co Inc
Special Custody A/C FBO Customers Attn Mutual Funds 211 Main Street San Francisco CA 94105-1905 |
6.76%
|
|||||
|
||||||
E*Trade Savings Bank
PO Box 6503 Englewood CO 80155-6503 |
6.65%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Edward D Jones & Co
For the Benefit of Customers 12555 Manchester Rd Saint Louis MO 63131-3710 |
6.58%
|
|||||
|
||||||
American Enterprise Investment Serv
707 2
nd
Minneapolis MN 55402-2405 |
6.38%
|
|||||
|
||||||
LPL Financial
Omnibus Customer Account Attn Mutual Fund Trading 4707 Executive Dr San Diego CA 92121-3091 |
5.29%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
Class C Shares |
Wells Fargo Clearing Services LLC Special Custody Acct for the Exclusive Benefit of Customer 2801 Market St Saint Louis MO 63103-2523 |
21.45% |
||||
|
||||||
Pershing LLC
1 Pershing Plz Jersey City NJ 07399-0001 |
13.88%
|
|||||
|
Name of Fund and Class
|
Name and Address of Owner
|
Percentage of
Ownership |
||||
JP Morgan Securities LLC Omnibus
Account for the Exclusive Benefit Of Customers 4 Chase Metrotech Ctr 3
rd
Mutual Fund Department Brooklyn NY 11245-0003 |
12.91%
|
|||||
|
||||||
UBS WM USA
Omni Account M/F Spec Cdy A/C EBOC UBSFSI 1000 Harbor Blvd Weehawken NJ 07086-6761 |
11.84%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Charles Schwab & Co Inc
Special Custody Acct FBO Customers Attn: Mutual Funds 211 Main St San Francisco CA 94105-1905 |
6.44%
|
|||||
|
||||||
American Enterprise Investment Serv
707 2
nd
Minneapolis MN 55402-2405 |
6.11%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Raymond James
Omnibus for Mutual Funds House Acct Attn: Courtney Waller 880 Carillon Parkway St Petersburg FL 33716-1102 |
5.83%
|
|||||
|
||||||
LPL Financial
Omnibus Customer Account Attn Mutual Fund Trading 4707 Executive Dr San Diego CA 92121-3091 |
5.81%
|
|||||
|
||||||
National Financial Services LLC
For the Exclusive Benefit of our Customers Attn Mutual Fund Dept 4
th
499 Washington Blvd Jersey City NJ 07310-1995 |
5.27%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
Class R3 Shares |
Ascensus Trust Company FBO Make-A-Wish 401 K Plan PO Box 10758 Fargo ND 58106-0758 |
34.12% |
||||
|
||||||
State Street Bank and Trust Company
Trustee and/or Custodian FBO ADP Access Product 1 Lincoln St Boston MA 02111-2901 |
21.69%
|
|||||
|
Name of Fund and Class
|
Name and Address of Owner
|
Percentage of
Ownership |
||||
Mid Atlantic Trust Company FBO
Nosich & Ganz Attorneys at Law 1251 Waterfront Place, Suite 525 Pittsburgh PA 15222-4228 |
14.72%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Pershing LLC
1 Pershing Plz Jersey City NJ 07399-0001 |
10.41%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Ascensus Trust Co FBOY FBO
Morris & Moffitt Inc 401K Plan PO Box 10758 Fargo ND 58106-0758 |
6.41%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Mid Atlantic Trust Company FBO
Seidman & Associates PC 401(K) Prof 1251 Waterfront Place, Suite 525 Pittsburgh PA 15222-4228 |
5.13%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
Class I Shares |
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA FBO TIAA-CREF Trust Co as Cust For IRA Clients 4 Metrotech Ctr Brooklyn NY 11245-0004 |
12.76% |
||||
|
||||||
National Financial Services LLC
For the Exclusive Benefit of our Customers Attn Mutual Fund Dept 4
th
499 Washington Blvd Jersey City NJ 07310-1995 |
12.02%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Pershing LLC
1 Pershing Plz Jersey City NJ 07399-0001 |
11.60%
|
|||||
|
||||||
UBS WM USA
Omni Account M/F Spec Cdy A/C EBOC UBSFSI 1000 Harbor Blvd Weehawken NJ 07086-6761 |
9.88%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Band & Co
C/O US Bank PO Box 1787 Milwaukee WI 53201-1787 |
9.49%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Charles Schwab & Co Inc
Special Custody A/C FBO Customers Attn Mutual Funds 211 Main Street San Francisco CA 94105-1905 |
6.58%
|
|||||
|
Name of Fund and Class
|
Name and Address of Owner
|
Percentage of
Ownership |
||||
Raymond James
Omnibus for Mutual Funds House Acct Attn: Courtney Waller 880 Carillon Parkway St Petersburg FL 33716-1102 |
5.26%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
Class A Shares |
National Financial Services LLC For the Exclusive Benefit of our Customers Attn Mutual Fund Dept 4
th
499 Washington Blvd Jersey City NJ 07310-1995 |
20.80% |
||||
|
||||||
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith
Attn Physical Team 4800 Deer Lake Dr E Jacksonville FL 32246-6484 |
12.92%
|
|||||
|
||||||
American Enterprise Investment Serv
707 2
nd
Minneapolis MN 55402-2405 |
9.06%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Charles Schwab & Co Inc
Special Custody A/C FBO Customers Attn Mutual Funds 211 Main Street San Francisco CA 94105-1905 |
8.61%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Wells Fargo Clearing Services LLC
Special Custody Acct for the Exclusive Benefit of Customer 2801 Market St Saint Louis MO 63103-2523 |
7.02%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Pershing LLC
1 Pershing Plz Jersey City NJ 07399-0001 |
5.96%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
Class C Shares |
American Enterprise Investment Serv 707 2
nd
Minneapolis MN 55402-2405 |
14.63% |
||||
|
||||||
Wells Fargo Clearing Services LLC
Special Custody Acct for the Exclusive Benefit of Customer 2801 Market St Saint Louis MO 63103-2523 |
14.28%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Charles Schwab & Co Inc
Special Custody Acct FBO Customers Attn: Mutual Funds 211 Main St San Francisco CA 94105-1905 |
13.98%
|
|||||
|
Name of Fund and Class
|
Name and Address of Owner
|
Percentage of
Ownership |
||||
Pershing LLC
1 Pershing Plz Jersey City NJ 07399-0001 |
13.00%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Raymond James
Omnibus for Mutual Funds House Acct Attn: Courtney Waller 880 Carillon Parkway St Petersburg FL 33716-1102 |
8.04%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
For the Exclusive Bene of its Cust 1 New York Plz Fl 12 New York NY 10004-1932 |
7.62%
|
|||||
|
||||||
LPL Financial
Omnibus Customer Account Attn Mutual Fund Trading 4707 Executive Dr San Diego CA 92121-3091 |
7.20%
|
|||||
|
||||||
UBS WM USA
Omni Account M/F Spec Cdy A/C EBOC UBSFSI 1000 Harbor Blvd Weehawken NJ 07086-6761 |
5.54%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
Class R3 Shares |
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Attn Physical Team 4800 Deer Lake Dr E Jacksonville FL 32246-6484 |
21.68% |
||||
|
||||||
PAI Trust Company, Inc.
Michael J. Adler DDS PC 1300 Enterprise Drive De Pere WI 54115-4934 |
21.67%
|
|||||
|
||||||
FIIOC FBO
Fabian E. Espinosa MD PA 401(K) Plan 100 Magellan Way Covington KY 41015-1987 |
7.15%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Laurance Kam FBO
Cariology Specialists of 401(K) PR 6715 Little River Tpke Annandale VA 22003-3565 |
6.59%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Matrix Trust Company Cust. FBO
Sorenson Engineering Inc PS 401K 717 17
th
Suite 1300 Denver CO 80202-3304 |
5.51%
|
|||||
|
Name of Fund and Class
|
Name and Address of Owner
|
Percentage of
Ownership |
||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
Class R6 Shares |
Mac & Co Attn: Mutual Fund Operations 500 Grant Street Room 151-1010 Pittsburgh PA 15219-2502 |
76.42% |
||||
|
||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
Class I Shares |
Band & Co C/O US Bank PO Box 1787 Milwaukee WI 53201-1787 |
24.00% |
||||
|
||||||
Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner
& Smith Safekeeping Attn Physical Team 4800 Deer Lake Dr E Jacksonville FL 32246-6484 |
12.45%
|
|||||
|
||||||
American Enterprise Investment Serv
707 2
nd
Minneapolis MN 55402-2405 |
10.00%
|
|||||
|
||||||
National Financial Services LLC
For the Exclusive Benefit of our Customers Attn Mutual Fund Dept 4
th
499 Washington Blvd Jersey City NJ 07310-1995 |
9.74%
|
|||||
|
||||||
LPL Financial
Omnibus Customer Account Attn Mutual Fund Trading 4707 Executive Dr San Diego CA 92121-3091 |
5.68%
|
|||||
|
||||||
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
For the Exclusive Bene of its Cust 1 New York Plz Fl 12 New York NY 10004-1932 |
5.30%
|
Fund
|
Expiration Year
|
Capital Loss
Carry-Forwards |
|||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
Not subject to expiration
|
$
|
138,028,618
|
||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
Not subject to expiration
|
47,003,301
|
Net asset value per share
|
$
|
6.69
|
|
Per share sales charge—4.75% of public offering price (4.93% of net asset value per share)
|
0.33
|
||
Per share offering price to the public
|
$
|
7.02
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
immediate family members
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
immediate family members
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
|
·
|
|
Annual Distribution Fee
|
Annual Service Fee
|
Total 12b-1 Fee
|
|||||||
Class A
|
—
|
0.25
|
%
|
0.25
|
%
|
||||
Class C
|
0.75
|
%
|
0.25
|
%
|
1.00
|
%
|
|||
Class R3
|
0.25
|
%
|
0.25
|
%
|
0.50
|
%
|
12b-1 Fees Incurred by Each Fund for the
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2020 |
|||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund:
|
|||
Class A
|
|
||
Class C
|
295,943
|
||
Class R3
|
1,437
|
||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund:
|
|||
Class A
|
324,351
|
||
Class C
|
384,776
|
||
Class R3
|
14,116
|
Total Underwriting Commissions
|
||||||||||||
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2018 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2019 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2020 |
|||||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
$
|
511
|
$
|
412
|
$
|
189
|
||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
116
|
76
|
572
|
Underwriting Commissions Retained by
Distributor |
||||||||||||||
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2018 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2019 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2020 |
|||||||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
$
|
54
|
$
|
44
|
$
|
21
|
||||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
12
|
7
|
71
|
Compensation on Redemptions and
Repurchases |
||||||||||||
Fund
|
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2018 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2019 |
Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2020 |
|||||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund
|
$
|
26
|
$
|
9
|
$
|
6
|
||||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund
|
19
|
8
|
2
|
AAA
|
An obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is extremely strong.
|
AA
|
An obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is very strong.
|
A
|
An obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is still strong.
|
BBB
|
An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
|
BB, B, CCC, CC, and C
|
Obligations rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’ are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and ‘C’ the highest. While such obligations will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposure to adverse conditions.
|
BB
|
An obligation rated ‘BB’ is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions that could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
|
B
|
An obligation rated ‘B’ is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated ‘BB’, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
|
CCC
|
An obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
|
CC
|
An obligation rated ‘CC’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment. The ‘CC’ rating is used when a default has not yet occurred but S&P Global Ratings expects default to be a virtual certainty, regardless of the anticipated time to default.
|
C
|
An obligation rated ‘C’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, and the obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate recovery compared with obligations that are rated higher.
|
D
|
An obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within five business days in the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or 30 calendar days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed exchange offer.
|
A-1
|
A short-term obligation rated ‘A-1’ is rated in the highest category by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is strong. Within this category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on these obligations is extremely strong.
|
A-2
|
A short-term obligation rated ‘A-2’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is satisfactory.
|
A-3
|
A short-term obligation rated ‘A-3’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken an obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
|
B
|
A short-term obligation rated ‘B’ is regarded as vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces major ongoing uncertainties that could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments.
|
C
|
A short-term obligation rated ‘C’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
|
D
|
A short-term obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to a distressed exchange offer.
|
Aaa
|
Obligations rated Aaa are judged to be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level of credit risk.
|
Aa
|
Obligations rated Aa are judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.
|
A
|
Obligations rated A are judged to be upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.
|
Baa
|
Obligations rated Baa are judged to be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative characteristics.
|
Ba
|
Obligations rated Ba are judged to be speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.
|
B
|
Obligations rated B are considered speculative and are subject to high credit risk.
|
Caa
|
Obligations rated Caa are judged to be speculative of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.
|
Ca
|
Obligations rated Ca are highly speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and interest.
|
C
|
Obligations rated C are the lowest rated and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.
|
P-1
|
Ratings of Prime-1 reflect a superior ability to repay short-term obligations.
|
P-2
|
Ratings of Prime-2 reflect a strong ability to repay short-term obligations.
|
P-3
|
Ratings of Prime-3 reflect an acceptable ability to repay short- term obligations.
|
NP
|
Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.
|
MIG 1
|
This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by established cash flows, highly reliable liquidity support, or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.
|
MIG 2
|
This designation denotes strong credit quality. Margins of protection are ample, although not as large as in the preceding group.
|
MIG 3
|
This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Liquidity and cash-flow protection may be narrow, and market access for refinancing is likely to be less well-established.
|
SG
|
This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Debt instruments in this category may lack sufficient margins of protection.
|
VMIG 1
|
This designation denotes superior credit quality. Excellent protection is afforded by the superior short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand.
|
VMIG 2
|
This designation denotes strong credit quality. Good protection is afforded by the strong short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand.
|
VMIG 3
|
This designation denotes acceptable credit quality. Adequate protection is afforded by the satisfactory short-term credit strength of the liquidity provider and structural and legal protections that ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand.
|
SG
|
This designation denotes speculative-grade credit quality. Demand features rated in this category may be supported by a liquidity provider that does not have a sufficiently strong short-term rating or may lack the structural and/or legal protections necessary to ensure the timely payment of purchase price upon demand.
|
AAA
|
Highest credit quality. ‘AAA’ ratings denote the lowest expectation of default risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.
|
AA
|
Very high credit quality. ‘AA’ ratings denote expectations of very low default risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments. This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.
|
A
|
High credit quality. ‘A’ ratings denote expectations of low default risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may, nevertheless, be
|
|
more vulnerable to adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings.
|
BBB
|
Good credit quality. ‘BBB’ ratings indicate that expectations of default risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered adequate, but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity.
|
BB
|
Speculative. ‘BB’ ratings indicate an elevated vulnerability to default risk, particularly in the event of adverse changes in business or economic conditions over time; however, business or financial flexibility exists that supports the servicing of financial commitments.
|
B
|
Highly speculative. ‘B’ ratings indicate that material default risk is present, but a limited margin of safety remains. Financial commitments are currently being met; however, capacity for continued payment is vulnerable to deterioration in the business and economic environment.
|
CCC
|
Substantial credit risk. Default is a real possibility.
|
CC
|
Very high levels of credit risk. Default of some kind appears probable.
|
C
|
Near default. A default or default-like process has begun, or the issuer is in standstill, or for a closed funding vehicle, payment capacity is irrevocably impaired. Conditions that are indicative of a ‘C’ category rating for an issuer include:
·
·
·
·
|
RD
|
Restricted default. ‘RD’ ratings indicate an issuer that in Fitch’s opinion has experienced:
·
·
·
This would include:
·
·
·
|
D
|
Default. ‘D’ ratings indicate an issuer that in Fitch’s opinion has entered into bankruptcy filings, administration, receivership, liquidation or other formal winding-up procedure, or that has otherwise ceased business.
Default ratings are not assigned prospectively to entities or their obligations; within this context, non-payment on an instrument that contains a deferral feature or grace period will generally not be considered a default until after the expiration of the deferral or grace period, unless a default is otherwise driven by bankruptcy or other similar circumstance, or by a distressed debt exchange.
|
|
In all cases, the assignment of a default rating reflects the agency’s opinion as to the most appropriate rating category consistent with the rest of its universe of ratings, and may differ from the definition of default under the terms of an issuer’s financial obligations or local commercial practice.
|
F1
|
Highest short-term credit quality. Indicates the strongest intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; may have an added “+” to denote any exceptionally strong credit feature.
|
F2
|
Good short-term credit quality. Good intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments.
|
F3
|
Fair short-term credit quality. The intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is adequate.
|
B
|
Speculative short-term credit quality. Minimal capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, plus heightened vulnerability to near term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.
|
C
|
High short-term default risk. Default is a real possibility.
|
RD
|
Restricted default. Indicates an entity that has defaulted on one or more of its financial commitments, although it continues to meet other financial obligations. Typically applicable to entity ratings only.
|
D
|
Default. Indicates a broad-based default event for an entity, or the default of a short-term obligation.
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|||
1.
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
||
|
|
|
8
|
|
||
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
||
|
|
|
12
|
|
||
|
|
|
12
|
|
||
|
|
|
16
|
|
||
|
|
|
16
|
|
||
|
|
|
16
|
|
||
|
|
|
17
|
|
||
|
|
|
17
|
|
||
|
|
|
17
|
|
||
|
|
|
17
|
|
||
|
|
|
17
|
|
||
|
|
|
17
|
|
||
|
|
|
17
|
|
||
|
|
|
18
|
|
||
|
|
|
18
|
|
||
|
|
|
18
|
|
||
|
|
|
18
|
|
||
|
|
|
19
|
|
||
|
|
|
19
|
|
||
|
|
|
19
|
|
||
|
|
|
20
|
|
||
|
|
|
20
|
|
||
|
|
|
20
|
|
||
2.
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
||
|
|
|
21
|
|
||
|
|
|
21
|
|
||
|
|
|
21
|
|
||
3.
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
||
|
|
|
23
|
|
||
|
|
|
23
|
|
||
|
|
|
23
|
|
||
|
|
|
24
|
|
||
|
|
|
24
|
|
||
|
|
|
24
|
|
||
|
|
|
24
|
|
||
|
|
|
24
|
|
||
|
|
|
25
|
|
||
|
|
|
25
|
|
||
|
|
|
25
|
|
||
|
|
|
25
|
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
2 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
||
|
|
|
26
|
|
||
|
|
|
26
|
|
||
|
|
|
27
|
|
||
|
|
|
27
|
|
||
|
|
|
27
|
|
||
|
|
|
28
|
|
||
|
|
|
28
|
|
||
|
|
|
28
|
|
||
|
|
|
28
|
|
||
4.
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
||
|
|
|
29
|
|
||
|
|
|
29
|
|
||
|
|
|
30
|
|
||
|
|
|
30
|
|
||
|
|
|
30
|
|
||
|
|
|
30
|
|
||
|
|
|
30
|
|
||
|
|
|
31
|
|
||
|
|
|
31
|
|
||
|
|
|
31
|
|
||
|
|
|
31
|
|
||
|
|
|
32
|
|
||
|
|
|
32
|
|
||
|
|
|
32
|
|
||
|
|
|
32
|
|
||
|
|
|
32
|
|
||
|
|
|
32
|
|
||
|
|
|
33
|
|
||
|
|
|
33
|
|
||
|
|
|
33
|
|
||
|
|
|
33
|
|
||
|
|
|
34
|
|
||
|
|
|
34
|
|
||
|
|
|
34
|
|
||
|
|
|
35
|
|
||
|
|
|
36
|
|
||
|
|
|
36
|
|
||
|
|
|
37
|
|
||
|
|
|
37
|
|
||
|
|
|
37
|
|
||
5.
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
||
|
|
|
39
|
|
||
|
|
|
40
|
|
||
|
|
|
40
|
|
||
|
|
|
41
|
|
||
|
|
|
42
|
|
||
|
|
|
42
|
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
3 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
||
|
|
|
43
|
|
||
|
|
|
44
|
|
||
|
|
|
44
|
|
||
|
|
|
44
|
|
||
|
|
|
44
|
|
||
|
|
|
45
|
|
||
|
|
|
45
|
|
||
|
|
|
46
|
|
||
|
|
|
46
|
|
||
|
|
|
46
|
|
||
|
|
|
46
|
|
||
|
|
|
46
|
|
||
|
|
|
46
|
|
||
|
|
|
46
|
|
||
|
|
|
46
|
|
||
|
|
|
47
|
|
||
|
|
|
47
|
|
||
|
|
|
47
|
|
||
|
|
|
48
|
|
||
|
|
|
48
|
|
||
|
|
|
48
|
|
||
|
|
|
49
|
|
||
|
|
|
49
|
|
||
|
|
|
49
|
|
||
|
|
|
49
|
|
||
|
|
|
49
|
|
||
|
|
|
50
|
|
||
|
|
|
50
|
|
||
|
|
|
50
|
|
||
|
|
|
50
|
|
||
|
|
|
51
|
|
||
|
|
|
51
|
|
||
|
|
|
51
|
|
||
|
|
|
52
|
|
||
|
|
|
52
|
|
||
|
|
|
52
|
|
||
|
|
|
52
|
|
||
|
|
|
53
|
|
||
|
|
|
53
|
|
||
6.
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
||
|
|
|
54
|
|
||
|
|
|
54
|
|
||
|
|
|
54
|
|
||
|
|
|
54
|
|
||
|
|
|
54
|
|
||
7.
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
||
|
|
|
55
|
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
4 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
||
|
|
|
55
|
|
||
|
|
|
56
|
|
||
|
|
|
56
|
|
||
|
|
|
56
|
|
||
|
|
|
56
|
|
||
|
|
|
56
|
|
||
|
|
|
57
|
|
||
|
|
|
57
|
|
||
|
|
|
57
|
|
||
|
|
|
58
|
|
||
|
|
|
58
|
|
||
|
|
|
59
|
|
||
|
|
|
59
|
|
||
|
|
|
59
|
|
||
|
|
|
59
|
|
||
|
|
|
60
|
|
||
|
|
|
60
|
|
||
|
|
|
60
|
|
||
|
|
|
60
|
|
||
|
|
|
60
|
|
||
|
|
|
61
|
|
||
|
|
|
61
|
|
||
|
|
|
61
|
|
||
|
|
|
61
|
|
||
|
|
|
61
|
|
||
|
|
|
62
|
|
||
|
|
|
62
|
|
||
|
|
|
62
|
|
||
|
|
|
62
|
|
||
|
|
|
62
|
|
||
|
|
|
63
|
|
||
|
|
|
63
|
|
||
|
|
|
63
|
|
||
|
|
|
63
|
|
||
|
|
|
64
|
|
||
|
|
|
64
|
|
||
|
|
|
64
|
|
||
|
|
|
64
|
|
||
|
|
|
64
|
|
||
8.
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
||
|
|
|
66
|
|
||
|
|
|
66
|
|
||
|
|
|
66
|
|
||
|
|
|
66
|
|
||
|
|
|
66
|
|
||
|
|
|
67
|
|
||
|
|
|
67
|
|
||
|
|
|
67
|
|
||
|
|
|
67
|
|
||
|
|
|
67
|
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
5 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
||
|
|
|
68
|
|
||
|
|
|
68
|
|
||
|
|
|
68
|
|
||
|
|
|
68
|
|
||
|
|
|
68
|
|
||
|
|
|
69
|
|
||
|
|
|
69
|
|
||
|
|
|
69
|
|
||
|
|
|
69
|
|
||
|
|
|
69
|
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
6 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
U.S. Domestic Issuers – which have a majority of outstanding shares held in the U.S. and meet other criteria, as determined by the SEC, and are subject to the same disclosure and listing standards as U.S. incorporated companies – are generally covered under standard U.S. policy guidelines.
|
|
◾
|
|
Foreign Private Issuers (FPIs) – which do not meet the Domestic Issuer criteria and are exempt from most disclosure requirements (e.g., they do not file DEF14A reports) and listing standards (e.g., for required levels of board and committee independence) – are covered under a combination of policy guidelines:
|
|
◾
|
|
FPI Guidelines (see the
Americas Regional Proxy Voting Guidelines
), which apply certain minimum independence and disclosure standards in the evaluation of key proxy ballot items, such as the election of directors and approval of financial reports; and
|
|
◾
|
|
For other issues, guidelines for the market that is responsible for, or most relevant to, the item on the ballot.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
7 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
1
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Independent directors comprise 50 percent or less of the board;
|
|
◾
|
|
The
non-independent
director serves on the audit, compensation, or nominating committee;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company lacks an audit, compensation, or nominating committee so that the full board functions as that committee; or
|
|
◾
|
|
The company lacks a formal nominating committee, even if the board attests that the independent directors fulfill the functions of such a committee.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
8 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Director
|
|
1.1.
|
Current employee or current officer
1
of the company or one of its affiliates
2
.
|
|
|
Non-Independent
Non-Executive
Director
|
|
Board Identification
|
|
|
2.1.
|
Director identified as not independent by the board.
|
|
Controlling/Significant Shareholder
|
|
|
2.2.
|
Beneficial owner of more than 50 percent of the company’s voting power (this may be aggregated if voting power is distributed among more than one member of a group).
|
|
Former CEO/Interim Officer
|
|
|
2.3.
|
Former CEO of the company.
3, 4
|
|
2.4.
|
Former CEO of an acquired company within the past five years.
4
|
|
2.5.
|
Former interim officer if the service was longer than 18 months. If the service was between 12 and 18 months an assessment of the interim officer’s employment agreement will be made.
5
|
|
Non-CEO Executives
|
|
|
2.6.
|
Former officer
1
2
|
|
2.7.
|
Officer
1
|
|
2.8.
|
Officer
1
|
|
Family Members
|
|
|
2.9.
|
Immediate family member
6
1
2
|
|
2.10.
|
Immediate family member
6
2
non-Section
16 officer in a key strategic role).
|
|
Transactional, Professional, Financial, and Charitable Relationships
|
|
|
2.11.
|
Currently provides (or an immediate family member
6
7
2
|
|
2.12.
|
Is (or an immediate family member
6
7
2
|
|
2.13.
|
Has (or an immediate family member
6
8
2
|
|
2.14.
|
Is (or an immediate family member
6
8
2
|
|
2.15.
|
Is (or an immediate family member
6
non-profit
organization that receives material grants or endowments
8
2
.
|
|
Other Relationships
|
|
|
2.16.
|
Party to a voting agreement
9
|
|
2.17.
|
Has (or an immediate family member
6
10
|
|
2.18.
|
Founder
11
|
|
2.19.
|
Any material
12
|
|
|
Independent Director
|
|
3.1.
|
No material
12
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
9 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
10 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Medical issues/illness;
|
|
◾
|
|
Family emergencies; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Missing only one meeting (when the total of all meetings is three or fewer).
|
|
◾
|
|
Sit on more than five public company boards; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Are CEOs of public companies who sit on the boards of more than two public companies besides their own — withhold only at their outside boards
4
|
|
◾
|
|
Until Feb. 1, 2021, a firm commitment, as stated in the proxy statement, to appoint at least one woman to the board within a year;
|
|
◾
|
|
The presence of a woman on the board at the preceding annual meeting and a firm commitment to appoint at least one woman to the board within a year; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Other relevant factors as applicable.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
11 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
The board failed to act on a shareholder proposal that received the support of a majority of the shares cast in the previous year or failed to act on a management proposal seeking to ratify an existing charter/bylaw provision that received opposition of a majority of the shares cast in the previous year. Factors that will be considered are:
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosed outreach efforts by the board to shareholders in the wake of the vote;
|
|
◾
|
|
Rationale provided in the proxy statement for the level of implementation;
|
|
◾
|
|
The subject matter of the proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
The level of support for and opposition to the resolution in past meetings;
|
|
◾
|
|
Actions taken by the board in response to the majority vote and its engagement with shareholders;
|
|
◾
|
|
The continuation of the underlying issue as a voting item on the ballot (as either shareholder or management proposals); and
|
|
◾
|
|
Other factors as appropriate.
|
|
◾
|
|
The board failed to act on takeover offers where the majority of shares are tendered;
|
|
◾
|
|
At the previous board election, any director received more than 50 percent withhold/against votes of the shares cast and the company has failed to address the issue(s) that caused the high withhold/against vote.
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s previous
say-on-pay
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s response, including:
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of engagement efforts with major institutional investors, including the frequency and timing of engagements and the company participants (including whether independent directors participated);
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of the specific concerns voiced by dissenting shareholders that led to the
say-on-pay
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of specific and meaningful actions taken to address shareholders’ concerns;
|
|
◾
|
|
Other recent compensation actions taken by the company;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the issues raised are recurring or isolated;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s ownership structure; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the support level was less than 50 percent, which would warrant the highest degree of responsiveness.
|
|
◾
|
|
The board implements an advisory vote on executive compensation on a less frequent basis than the frequency that received the plurality of votes cast.
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has a poison pill that was not approved by shareholders
5
. However, vote
case-by-case
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
12 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rationale for the adoption, and other factors as relevant (such as a commitment to put any renewal to a shareholder vote).
|
|
◾
|
|
The board makes a material adverse modification to an existing pill, including, but not limited to, extension, renewal, or lowering the trigger, without shareholder approval.
|
|
◾
|
|
A classified board structure;
|
|
◾
|
|
A supermajority vote requirement;
|
|
◾
|
|
Either a plurality vote standard in uncontested director elections, or a majority vote standard in contested elections;
|
|
◾
|
|
The inability of shareholders to call special meetings;
|
|
◾
|
|
The inability of shareholders to act by written consent;
|
|
◾
|
|
A multi-class capital structure; and/or
|
|
◾
|
|
A
non-shareholder-approved
poison pill.
|
|
◾
|
|
The board’s rationale for adopting the bylaw/charter amendment without shareholder ratification;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure by the company of any significant engagement with shareholders regarding the amendment;
|
|
◾
|
|
The level of impairment of shareholders’ rights caused by the board’s unilateral amendment to the bylaws/charter;
|
|
◾
|
|
The board’s track record with regard to unilateral board action on bylaw/charter amendments or other entrenchment provisions;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s ownership structure;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s existing governance provisions;
|
|
◾
|
|
The timing of the board’s amendment to the bylaws/charter in connection with a significant business development; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Other factors, as deemed appropriate, that may be relevant to determine the impact of the amendment on shareholders.
|
|
◾
|
|
Classified the board;
|
|
◾
|
|
Adopted supermajority vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Eliminated shareholders’ ability to amend bylaws.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
13 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Supermajority vote requirements to amend the bylaws or charter;
|
|
◾
|
|
A classified board structure; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Other egregious provisions.
|
|
◾
|
|
The presence of a shareholder proposal addressing the same issue on the same ballot;
|
|
◾
|
|
The board’s rationale for seeking ratification;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of actions to be taken by the board should the ratification proposal fail;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of shareholder engagement regarding the board’s ratification request;
|
|
◾
|
|
The level of impairment to shareholders’ rights caused by the existing provision;
|
|
◾
|
|
The history of management and shareholder proposals on the provision at the company’s past meetings;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the current provision was adopted in response to the shareholder proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s ownership structure; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Previous use of ratification proposals to exclude shareholder proposals.
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s governing documents impose undue restrictions on shareholders’ ability to amend the bylaws. Such restrictions include but are not limited to: outright prohibition on the submission of binding shareholder
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
14 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
proposals or share ownership requirements, subject matter restrictions, or time holding requirements in excess of SEC Rule
14a-8.
Vote against or withhold on an ongoing basis.
|
|
◾
|
|
The
non-audit
fees paid to the auditor are
excessive
;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company receives an adverse opinion on the company’s financial statements from its auditor; or
|
|
◾
|
|
There is persuasive evidence that the Audit Committee entered into an inappropriate indemnification agreement with its auditor that limits the ability of the company, or its shareholders, to pursue legitimate legal recourse against the audit firm.
|
|
◾
|
|
Poor accounting practices are identified that rise to a level of serious concern, such as: fraud; misapplication of GAAP; and material weaknesses identified in Section 404 disclosures. Examine the severity, breadth, chronological sequence, and duration, as well as the company’s efforts at remediation or corrective actions, in determining whether withhold/against votes are warranted.
|
|
◾
|
|
There is an unmitigated misalignment between CEO pay and company performance (
pay for performance
);
|
|
◾
|
|
The company maintains significant
problematic pay practices
; or
|
|
◾
|
|
The board exhibits a significant level of
poor communication and responsiveness
to shareholders.
|
|
◾
|
|
The company fails to include a Say on Pay ballot item when required under SEC provisions, or under the company’s declared frequency of say on pay; or
|
|
◾
|
|
The company fails to include a Frequency of Say on Pay ballot item when required under SEC provisions.
|
|
◾
|
|
The presence of an anti-pledging policy, disclosed in the proxy statement, that prohibits future pledging activity;
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
15 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
The magnitude of aggregate pledged shares in terms of total common shares outstanding, market value, and trading volume;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of progress or lack thereof in reducing the magnitude of aggregate pledged shares over time;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure in the proxy statement that shares subject to stock ownership and holding requirements do not include pledged company stock; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Any other relevant factors.
|
|
◾
|
|
Material failures of governance, stewardship, risk oversight
7
, or fiduciary responsibilities at the company;
|
|
◾
|
|
Failure to replace management as appropriate; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Egregious actions related to a director’s service on other boards that raise substantial doubt about his or her ability to effectively oversee management and serve the best interests of shareholders at any company.
|
|
General Recommendation:
“vote-no”
campaigns, evaluate director nominees under the existing governance policies for voting on director nominees in uncontested elections. Take into consideration the arguments submitted by shareholders and other publicly available information.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Long-term financial performance of the company relative to its industry;
|
|
◾
|
|
Management’s track record;
|
|
◾
|
|
Background to the contested election;
|
|
◾
|
|
Nominee qualifications and any compensatory arrangements;
|
|
◾
|
|
Strategic plan of dissident slate and quality of the critique against management;
|
|
◾
|
|
Likelihood that the proposed goals and objectives can be achieved (both slates); and
|
|
◾
|
|
Stock ownership positions.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
16 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The reasonableness/scope of the request; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s existing disclosure on its current CEO succession planning process.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has proxy access
8
, thereby allowing shareholders to nominate directors to the company’s ballot; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has adopted a majority vote standard, with a
carve-out
for plurality voting in situations where there are more nominees than seats, and a director resignation policy to address failed elections.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
17 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Eliminate entirely directors’ and officers’ liability for monetary damages for violating the duty of care.
|
|
◾
|
|
Expand coverage beyond just legal expenses to liability for acts that are more serious violations of fiduciary obligation than mere carelessness.
|
|
◾
|
|
Expand the scope of indemnification to provide for mandatory indemnification of company officials in connection with acts that previously the company was permitted to provide indemnification for, at the discretion of the company’s board (
i.e.
|
|
◾
|
|
If the director was found to have acted in good faith and in a manner that s/he reasonably believed was in the best interests of the company; and
|
|
◾
|
|
If only the director’s legal expenses would be covered.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s board committee structure, existing subject matter expertise, and board nomination provisions relative to that of its peers;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s existing board and management oversight mechanisms regarding the issue for which board oversight is sought;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s disclosure and performance relating to the issue for which board oversight is sought and any significant related controversies; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The scope and structure of the proposal.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Existing oversight mechanisms (including current committee structure) regarding the issue for which board oversight is sought;
|
|
◾
|
|
Level of disclosure regarding the issue for which board oversight is sought;
|
|
◾
|
|
Company performance related to the issue for which board oversight is sought;
|
|
◾
|
|
Board committee structure compared to that of other companies in its industry sector; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The scope and structure of the proposal.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
18 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The scope and rationale of the proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current board leadership structure;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s governance structure and practices;
|
|
◾
|
|
Company performance; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Any other relevant factors that may be applicable.
|
|
◾
|
|
A majority
non-independent
board and/or the presence of
non-independent
directors on key board committees;
|
|
◾
|
|
A weak or poorly-defined lead independent director role that fails to serve as an appropriate counterbalance to a combined CEO/chair role;
|
|
◾
|
|
The presence of an executive or
non-independent
chair in addition to the CEO, a recent recombination of the role of CEO and chair, and/or departure from a structure with an independent chair;
|
|
◾
|
|
Evidence that the board has failed to oversee and address material risks facing the company;
|
|
◾
|
|
A material governance failure, particularly if the board has failed to adequately respond to shareholder concerns or if the board has materially diminished shareholder rights; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Evidence that the board has failed to intervene when management’s interests are contrary to shareholders’ interests.
|
|
General Recommendation:
ISS’ Classification of Directors
.)
|
|
General Recommendation:
carve-out
for a plurality vote standard in contested elections is included.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
19 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Ownership threshold:
|
|
◾
|
|
Ownership duration:
|
|
◾
|
|
Aggregation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Cap:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Established a communication structure that goes beyond the exchange requirements to facilitate the exchange of information between shareholders and members of the board;
|
|
◾
|
|
Effectively disclosed information with respect to this structure to its shareholders;
|
|
◾
|
|
Company has not ignored majority-supported shareholder proposals or a majority withhold vote on a director nominee; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has an independent chair or a lead director, according to ISS’ definition. This individual must be made available for periodic consultation and direct communication with major shareholders.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
20 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The terms of the auditor agreement—the degree to which these agreements impact shareholders’ rights;
|
|
◾
|
|
The motivation and rationale for establishing the agreements;
|
|
◾
|
|
The quality of the company’s disclosure; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s historical practices in the audit area.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
An auditor has a financial interest in or association with the company, and is therefore not independent;
|
|
◾
|
|
There is reason to believe that the independent auditor has rendered an opinion that is neither accurate nor indicative of the company’s financial position;
|
|
◾
|
|
Poor accounting practices are identified that rise to a serious level of concern, such as fraud or misapplication of GAAP; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Fees for
non-audit
services (“Other” fees) are excessive.
|
|
◾
|
|
Non-audit
(“other”) fees > audit fees + audit-related fees + tax compliance/preparation fees
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
non-audit
services.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The tenure of the audit firm;
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
21 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
The length of rotation specified in the proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
Any significant audit-related issues at the company;
|
|
◾
|
|
The number of Audit Committee meetings held each year;
|
|
◾
|
|
The number of financial experts serving on the committee; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has a periodic renewal process where the auditor is evaluated for both audit quality and competitive price.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
22 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Any impediments to shareholders’ ability to amend the bylaws (i.e. supermajority voting requirements);
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s ownership structure and historical voting turnout;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the board could amend bylaws adopted by shareholders; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether shareholders would retain the ability to ratify any board-initiated amendments.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
cash-out
statutes.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
23 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
General Recommendation:
freeze-out
provisions.
Freeze-out
provisions force an investor who surpasses a certain ownership threshold in a company to wait a specified period of time before gaining control of the company.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s stated rationale for adopting such a provision;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of past harm from shareholder lawsuits in which plaintiffs were unsuccessful or shareholder lawsuits outside the jurisdiction of incorporation;
|
|
◾
|
|
The breadth of application of the bylaw, including the types of lawsuits to which it would apply and the definition of key terms; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Governance features such as shareholders’ ability to repeal the provision at a later date (including the vote standard applied when shareholders attempt to amend the bylaws) and their ability to hold directors accountable through annual director elections and a majority vote standard in uncontested elections.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
24 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The ownership threshold (NOL protective amendments generally prohibit stock ownership transfers that would result in a new
5-percent
holder or increase the stock ownership percentage of an existing
5-percent
holder);
|
|
◾
|
|
The value of the NOLs;
|
|
◾
|
|
Shareholder protection mechanisms (sunset provision or commitment to cause expiration of the protective amendment upon exhaustion or expiration of the NOL);
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s existing governance structure including: board independence, existing takeover defenses, track record of responsiveness to shareholders, and any other problematic governance concerns; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Any other factors that may be applicable.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Shareholders have approved the adoption of the plan; or
|
|
◾
|
|
The board, in its exercise of its fiduciary responsibilities, determines that it is in the best interest of shareholders under the circumstances to adopt a pill without the delay in adoption that would result from seeking stockholder approval (i.e., the “fiduciary out” provision). A poison pill adopted under this fiduciary out will be put to a shareholder ratification vote within 12 months of adoption or expire. If the pill is not approved by a majority of the votes cast on this issue, the plan will immediately terminate.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
No lower than a 20 percent trigger,
flip-in
or flip-over;
|
|
◾
|
|
A term of no more than three years;
|
|
◾
|
|
No dead-hand, slow-hand,
no-hand,
or similar feature that limits the ability of a future board to redeem the pill;
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
25 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Shareholder redemption feature (qualifying offer clause); if the board refuses to redeem the pill 90 days after a qualifying offer is announced, 10 percent of the shares may call a special meeting or seek a written consent to vote on rescinding the pill.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The ownership threshold to transfer (NOL pills generally have a trigger slightly below 5 percent);
|
|
◾
|
|
The value of the NOLs;
|
|
◾
|
|
Shareholder protection mechanisms (sunset provision, or commitment to cause expiration of the pill upon exhaustion or expiration of NOLs);
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s existing governance structure including: board independence, existing takeover defenses, track record of responsiveness to shareholders, and any other problematic governance concerns; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Any other factors that may be applicable.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
non-votes
in the company’s vote-counting methodology.
|
|
◾
|
|
The scope and structure of the proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s stated confidential voting policy (or other relevant policies) and whether it ensures a “level playing field” by providing shareholder proponents with equal access to vote information prior to the annual meeting;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s vote standard for management and shareholder proposals and whether it ensures consistency and fairness in the proxy voting process and maintains the integrity of vote results;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company’s disclosure regarding its vote counting method and other relevant voting policies with respect to management and shareholder proposals are consistent and clear;
|
|
◾
|
|
Any recent controversies or concerns related to the company’s proxy voting mechanics;
|
|
◾
|
|
Any unintended consequences resulting from implementation of the proposal; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Any other factors that may be relevant.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
26 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
The presence of a shareholder proposal addressing the same issue on the same ballot;
|
|
◾
|
|
The board’s rationale for seeking ratification;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of actions to be taken by the board should the ratification proposal fail;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of shareholder engagement regarding the board’s ratification request;
|
|
◾
|
|
The level of impairment to shareholders’ rights caused by the existing provision;
|
|
◾
|
|
The history of management and shareholder proposals on the provision at the company’s past meetings;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the current provision was adopted in response to the shareholder proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s ownership structure; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Previous use of ratification proposals to exclude shareholder proposals.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The election of fewer than 50 percent of the directors to be elected is contested in the election;
|
|
◾
|
|
One or more of the dissident’s candidates is elected;
|
|
◾
|
|
Shareholders are not permitted to cumulate their votes for directors; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The election occurred, and the expenses were incurred, after the adoption of this bylaw.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case,
|
|
◾
|
|
Reasons for reincorporation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Comparison of company’s governance practices and provisions prior to and following the reincorporation; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Comparison of corporation laws of original state and destination state.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Shareholders’ current right to act by written consent;
|
|
◾
|
|
The consent threshold;
|
|
◾
|
|
The inclusion of exclusionary or prohibitive language;
|
|
◾
|
|
Investor ownership structure; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Shareholder support of, and management’s response to, previous shareholder proposals.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
27 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
An unfettered
9
right for shareholders to call special meetings at a 10 percent threshold;
|
|
◾
|
|
A majority vote standard in uncontested director elections;
|
|
◾
|
|
No
non-shareholder-approved
pill; and
|
|
◾
|
|
An annually elected board.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Shareholders’ current right to call special meetings;
|
|
◾
|
|
Minimum ownership threshold necessary to call special meetings (10 percent preferred);
|
|
◾
|
|
The inclusion of exclusionary or prohibitive language;
|
|
◾
|
|
Investor ownership structure; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Shareholder support of, and management’s response to, previous shareholder proposals.
|
|
General Recommendation:
non-shareholder
constituencies or other
non-financial
effects when evaluating a merger or business combination.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Vote for management or shareholder proposals to reduce supermajority vote requirements. However, for companies with shareholder(s) who have significant ownership levels, vote
case-by-case,
|
|
◾
|
|
Ownership structure;
|
|
◾
|
|
Quorum requirements; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Vote requirements.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
28 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Past Board Performance:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s use of authorized shares during the last three years;
|
|
◾
|
|
The Current Request:
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure in the proxy statement of the specific purposes of the proposed increase;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure in the proxy statement of specific and severe risks to shareholders of not approving the request; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The dilutive impact of the request as determined relative to an allowable increase calculated by ISS (typically 100 percent of existing authorized shares) that reflects the company’s need for shares and total shareholder returns.
|
|
A.
|
Most companies:
100
percent
|
|
B.
|
Companies with less than 50 percent of existing authorized shares either outstanding or reserved for issuance:
50
percent
|
|
C.
|
Companies with
one-
and three-year total shareholder returns (TSRs) in the bottom 10 percent of the U.S. market as of the end of the calendar quarter that is closest to their most recent fiscal year end:
50
percent
|
|
D.
|
Companies at which both conditions (B and C) above are both present:
25
percent
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
29 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company discloses a compelling rationale for the dual-class capital structure, such as:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s auditor has concluded that there is substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern; or
|
|
◾
|
|
The new class of shares will be transitory;
|
|
◾
|
|
The new class is intended for financing purposes with minimal or no dilution to current shareholders in both the short term and long term; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The new class is not designed to preserve or increase the voting power of an insider or significant shareholder.
|
|
General Recommendation:
non-shareholder-approved
shareholder rights plan (poison pill).
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The size of the company;
|
|
◾
|
|
The shareholder base; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The liquidity of the stock.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Past Board Performance:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s use of authorized preferred shares during the last three years;
|
|
◾
|
|
The Current Request:
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure in the proxy statement of the specific purposes for the proposed increase;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure in the proxy statement of specific and severe risks to shareholders of not approving the request;
|
|
◾
|
|
In cases where the company has existing authorized preferred stock, the dilutive impact of the request as determined by an allowable increase calculated by ISS (typically 100 percent of existing authorized shares) that reflects the company’s need for shares and total shareholder returns; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the shares requested are blank check preferred shares that can be used for antitakeover purposes.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
30 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
More simplified capital structure;
|
|
◾
|
|
Enhanced liquidity;
|
|
◾
|
|
Fairness of conversion terms;
|
|
◾
|
|
Impact on voting power and dividends;
|
|
◾
|
|
Reasons for the reclassification;
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflicts of interest; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Other alternatives considered.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The number of authorized shares will be proportionately reduced; or
|
|
◾
|
|
The effective increase in authorized shares is equal to or less than the allowable increase calculated in accordance with ISS’ Common Stock Authorization policy.
|
|
◾
|
|
Stock exchange notification to the company of a potential delisting;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of substantial doubt about the company’s ability to continue as a going concern without additional financing;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s rationale; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Other factors as applicable.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Greenmail,
|
|
◾
|
|
The use of buybacks to inappropriately manipulate incentive compensation metrics,
|
|
◾
|
|
Threats to the company’s long-term viability, or
|
|
◾
|
|
Other company-specific factors as warranted.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
31 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Adverse governance changes;
|
|
◾
|
|
Excessive increases in authorized capital stock;
|
|
◾
|
|
Unfair method of distribution;
|
|
◾
|
|
Diminution of voting rights;
|
|
◾
|
|
Adverse conversion features;
|
|
◾
|
|
Negative impact on stock option plans; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Alternatives such as
spin-off.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Purchase price;
|
|
◾
|
|
Fairness opinion;
|
|
◾
|
|
Financial and strategic benefits;
|
|
◾
|
|
How the deal was negotiated;
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflicts of interest;
|
|
◾
|
|
Other alternatives for the business;
|
|
◾
|
|
Non-completion
risk.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Impact on the balance sheet/working capital;
|
|
◾
|
|
Potential elimination of diseconomies;
|
|
◾
|
|
Anticipated financial and operating benefits;
|
|
◾
|
|
Anticipated use of funds;
|
|
◾
|
|
Value received for the asset;
|
|
◾
|
|
Fairness opinion;
|
|
◾
|
|
How the deal was negotiated;
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflicts of interest.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
32 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Dilution to existing shareholders’ positions;
|
|
◾
|
|
Terms of the offer - discount/premium in purchase price to investor, including any fairness opinion; termination penalties; exit strategy;
|
|
◾
|
|
Financial issues - company’s financial situation; degree of need for capital; use of proceeds; effect of the financing on the company’s cost of capital;
|
|
◾
|
|
Management’s efforts to pursue other alternatives;
|
|
◾
|
|
Control issues - change in management; change in control, guaranteed board and committee seats; standstill provisions; voting agreements; veto power over certain corporate actions; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflict of interest - arm’s length transaction, managerial incentives.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The reasons for the change;
|
|
◾
|
|
Any financial or tax benefits;
|
|
◾
|
|
Regulatory benefits;
|
|
◾
|
|
Increases in capital structure; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Changes to the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the company.
|
|
◾
|
|
Increases in common or preferred stock in excess of the allowable maximum (see discussion under “Capital”); or
|
|
◾
|
|
Adverse changes in shareholder rights.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Offer price/premium;
|
|
◾
|
|
Fairness opinion;
|
|
◾
|
|
How the deal was negotiated;
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
33 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflicts of interest;
|
|
◾
|
|
Other alternatives/offers considered; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Non-completion
risk.
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has attained benefits from being publicly-traded (examination of trading volume, liquidity, and market research of the stock);
|
|
◾
|
|
Balanced interests of continuing vs.
cashed-out
shareholders, taking into account the following:
|
|
◾
|
|
Are all shareholders able to participate in the transaction?
|
|
◾
|
|
Will there be a liquid market for remaining shareholders following the transaction?
|
|
◾
|
|
Does the company have strong corporate governance?
|
|
◾
|
|
Will insiders reap the gains of control following the proposed transaction?
|
|
◾
|
|
Does the state of incorporation have laws requiring continued reporting that may benefit shareholders?
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Percentage of assets/business contributed;
|
|
◾
|
|
Percentage ownership;
|
|
◾
|
|
Financial and strategic benefits;
|
|
◾
|
|
Governance structure;
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflicts of interest;
|
|
◾
|
|
Other alternatives; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Non-completion
risk.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Management’s efforts to pursue other alternatives;
|
|
◾
|
|
Appraisal value of assets; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The compensation plan for executives managing the liquidation.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Valuation
|
|
◾
|
|
Market reaction
|
|
◾
|
|
Strategic rationale
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
34 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Negotiations and process
arm’s-length?
Was the process fair and equitable? A fair process helps to ensure the best price for shareholders. Significant negotiation “wins” can also signify the deal makers’ competency. The comprehensiveness of the sales process (e.g., full auction, partial auction, no auction) can also affect shareholder value.
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflicts of interest
non-insider
shareholders? As the result of potential conflicts, the directors and officers of the company may be more likely to vote to approve a merger than if they did not hold these interests. Consider whether these interests may have influenced these directors and officers to support or recommend the merger. The CIC figure presented in the “ISS Transaction Summary” section of this report is an aggregate figure that can in certain cases be a misleading indicator of the true value transfer from shareholders to insiders. Where such figure appears to be excessive, analyze the underlying assumptions to determine whether a potential conflict exists.
|
|
◾
|
|
Governance
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Dilution to existing shareholders’ position: The amount and timing of shareholder ownership dilution should be weighed against the needs and proposed shareholder benefits of the capital infusion. Although newly issued common stock, absent preemptive rights, is typically dilutive to existing shareholders, share price appreciation is often the necessary event to trigger the exercise of “out of the money” warrants and convertible debt. In these instances from a value standpoint, the negative impact of dilution is mitigated by the increase in the company’s stock price that must occur to trigger the dilutive event.
|
|
◾
|
|
Terms of the offer (discount/premium in purchase price to investor, including any fairness opinion, conversion features, termination penalties, exit strategy):
|
|
◾
|
|
The terms of the offer should be weighed against the alternatives of the company and in light of company’s financial condition. Ideally, the conversion price for convertible debt and the exercise price for warrants should be at a premium to the then prevailing stock price at the time of private placement.
|
|
◾
|
|
When evaluating the magnitude of a private placement discount or premium, consider factors that influence the discount or premium, such as, liquidity, due diligence costs, control and monitoring costs, capital scarcity, information asymmetry, and anticipation of future performance.
|
|
◾
|
|
Financial issues:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s financial condition;
|
|
◾
|
|
Degree of need for capital;
|
|
◾
|
|
Use of proceeds;
|
|
◾
|
|
Effect of the financing on the company’s cost of capital;
|
|
◾
|
|
Current and proposed cash burn rate;
|
|
◾
|
|
Going concern viability and the state of the capital and credit markets.
|
|
◾
|
|
Management’s efforts to pursue alternatives and whether the company engaged in a process to evaluate alternatives: A fair, unconstrained process helps to ensure the best price for shareholders. Financing alternatives can include joint ventures, partnership, merger, or sale of part or all of the company.
|
|
◾
|
|
Control issues:
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
35 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Change in management;
|
|
◾
|
|
Change in control;
|
|
◾
|
|
Guaranteed board and committee seats;
|
|
◾
|
|
Standstill provisions;
|
|
◾
|
|
Voting agreements;
|
|
◾
|
|
Veto power over certain corporate actions; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Minority versus majority ownership and corresponding minority discount or majority control premium.
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflicts of interest:
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflicts of interest should be viewed from the perspective of the company and the investor.
|
|
◾
|
|
Were the terms of the transaction negotiated at arm’s length? Are managerial incentives aligned with shareholder interests?
|
|
◾
|
|
Market reaction:
|
|
◾
|
|
The market’s response to the proposed deal. A negative market reaction is a cause for concern. Market reaction may be addressed by analyzing the
one-day
impact on the unaffected stock price.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Estimated value and financial prospects of the reorganized company;
|
|
◾
|
|
Percentage ownership of current shareholders in the reorganized company;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether shareholders are adequately represented in the reorganization process (particularly through the existence of an Official Equity Committee);
|
|
◾
|
|
The cause(s) of the bankruptcy filing, and the extent to which the plan of reorganization addresses the cause(s);
|
|
◾
|
|
Existence of a superior alternative to the plan of reorganization; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Governance of the reorganized company.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Valuation
pre-merger
value of SPAC. Additionally, a private company discount may be applied to the target, if it is a private entity.
|
|
◾
|
|
Market reaction
one-day
impact on the unaffected stock price.
|
|
◾
|
|
Deal timing
|
|
◾
|
|
Negotiations and process
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflicts of interest
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
36 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
third party or if management is encouraged to pay a higher price for the target because of an 80 percent rule (the charter requires that the fair market value of the target is at least equal to 80 percent of net assets of the SPAC). Also, there may be sense of urgency by the management team of the SPAC to close the deal since its charter typically requires a transaction to be completed within the
18-24
month timeframe.
|
|
◾
|
|
Voting agreements
|
|
◾
|
|
Governance
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
non-redeeming
shareholders, and any prior extension requests.
|
|
◾
|
|
Length of request
|
|
◾
|
|
Pending transaction(s)
progression of the acquisition process:
|
|
◾
|
|
Added incentive for
non-redeeming
shareholders
|
|
◾
|
|
Prior extension requests
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Tax and regulatory advantages;
|
|
◾
|
|
Planned use of the sale proceeds;
|
|
◾
|
|
Valuation of spinoff;
|
|
◾
|
|
Fairness opinion;
|
|
◾
|
|
Benefits to the parent company;
|
|
◾
|
|
Conflicts of interest;
|
|
◾
|
|
Managerial incentives;
|
|
◾
|
|
Corporate governance changes;
|
|
◾
|
|
Changes in the capital structure.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Hiring a financial advisor to explore strategic alternatives;
|
|
◾
|
|
Selling the company; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Liquidating the company and distributing the proceeds to shareholders.
|
|
◾
|
|
Prolonged poor performance with no turnaround in sight;
|
|
◾
|
|
Signs of entrenched board and management (such as the adoption of takeover defenses);
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
37 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Strategic plan in place for improving value;
|
|
◾
|
|
Likelihood of receiving reasonable value in a sale or dissolution; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company actively exploring its strategic options, including retaining a financial advisor.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
38 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Maintain appropriate
pay-for-performance
|
|
2.
|
Avoid arrangements that risk “pay for failure”: This principle addresses the appropriateness of long or indefinite contracts, excessive severance packages, and guaranteed compensation;
|
|
3.
|
Maintain an independent and effective compensation committee: This principle promotes oversight of executive pay programs by directors with appropriate skills, knowledge, experience, and a sound process for compensation decision-making (
e.g.
|
|
4.
|
Provide shareholders with clear, comprehensive compensation disclosures: This principle underscores the importance of informative and timely disclosures that enable shareholders to evaluate executive pay practices fully and fairly;
|
|
5.
|
Avoid inappropriate pay to
non-executive
directors: This principle recognizes the interests of shareholders in ensuring that compensation to outside directors is reasonable and does not compromise their independence and ability to make appropriate judgments in overseeing managers’ pay and performance. At the market level, it may incorporate a variety of generally accepted best practices.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
There is an unmitigated misalignment between CEO pay and company performance (pay for performance);
|
|
◾
|
|
The company maintains significant problematic pay practices;
|
|
◾
|
|
The board exhibits a significant level of
poor communication and responsiveness
to shareholders.
|
|
◾
|
|
There is no SOP on the ballot, and an against vote on an SOP would otherwise be warranted due to
pay-for-
|
|
◾
|
|
The board fails to respond adequately to a previous SOP proposal that received less than 70 percent support of votes cast;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has recently practiced or approved problematic pay practices, such as option repricing or option backdating; or
|
|
◾
|
|
The situation is egregious.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
39 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Peer Group
11
Alignment:
|
|
◾
|
|
The degree of alignment between the company’s annualized TSR rank and the CEO’s annualized total pay rank within a peer group, each measured over a three-year period.
|
|
◾
|
|
The rankings of CEO total pay and company financial performance within a peer group, each measured over a three-year period.
|
|
◾
|
|
The multiple of the CEO’s total pay relative to the peer group median in the most recent fiscal year.
|
|
2.
|
Absolute Alignment
12
– the absolute alignment between the trend in CEO pay and company TSR over the prior five fiscal years – i.e., the difference between the trend in annual pay changes and the trend in annualized TSR during the period.
|
|
◾
|
|
The ratio of performance- to time-based incentive awards;
|
|
◾
|
|
The overall ratio of performance-based compensation to fixed or discretionary pay;
|
|
◾
|
|
The rigor of performance goals;
|
|
◾
|
|
The complexity and risks around pay program design;
|
|
◾
|
|
The transparency and clarity of disclosure;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s peer group benchmarking practices;
|
|
◾
|
|
Financial/operational results, both absolute and relative to peers;
|
|
◾
|
|
Special circumstances related to, for example, a new CEO in the prior FY or anomalous equity grant practices (e.g.,
bi-annual
awards);
|
|
◾
|
|
Realizable pay
13
compared to grant pay; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Any other factors deemed relevant.
|
|
◾
|
|
Problematic practices related to
non-performance-based
compensation elements;
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
40 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Incentives that may motivate excessive risk-taking or present a windfall risk; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Pay decisions that circumvent
pay-for-performance,
|
|
◾
|
|
Repricing or replacing of underwater stock options/SARs without prior shareholder approval (including cash buyouts and voluntary surrender of underwater options);
|
|
◾
|
|
Extraordinary perquisites or tax
gross-ups;
|
|
◾
|
|
New or materially amended agreements that provide for:
|
|
◾
|
|
Excessive termination or CIC severance payments (generally exceeding 3 times base salary and average/target/most recent bonus);
|
|
◾
|
|
CIC severance payments without involuntary job loss or substantial diminution of duties (“single” or “modified single” triggers) or in connection with a problematic Good Reason definition;
|
|
◾
|
|
CIC excise tax
gross-up
entitlements (including “modified”
gross-ups);
|
|
◾
|
|
Multi-year guaranteed awards that are not at risk due to rigorous performance conditions;
|
|
◾
|
|
Liberal CIC definition combined with any single-trigger CIC benefits;
|
|
◾
|
|
Insufficient executive compensation disclosure by externally-managed issuers (EMIs) such that a reasonable assessment of pay programs and practices applicable to the EMI’s executives is not possible;
|
|
◾
|
|
Any other provision or practice deemed to be egregious and present a significant risk to investors.
|
|
◾
|
|
Reason and motive for the options backdating issue, such as inadvertent vs. deliberate grant date changes;
|
|
◾
|
|
Duration of options backdating;
|
|
◾
|
|
Size of restatement due to options backdating;
|
|
◾
|
|
Corrective actions taken by the board or compensation committee, such as canceling or
re-pricing
backdated options, the recouping of option gains on backdated grants; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Adoption of a grant policy that prohibits backdating and creates a fixed grant schedule or window period for equity grants in the future.
|
|
◾
|
|
Failure to respond to majority-supported shareholder proposals on executive pay topics; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Failure to adequately respond to the company’s previous
say-on-pay
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of engagement efforts with major institutional investors, including the frequency and timing of engagements and the company participants (including whether independent directors participated);
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
41 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of the specific concerns voiced by dissenting shareholders that led to the
say-on-pay
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of specific and meaningful actions taken to address shareholders’ concerns;
|
|
◾
|
|
Other recent compensation actions taken by the company;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the issues raised are recurring or isolated;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s ownership structure; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the support level was less than 50 percent, which would warrant the highest degree of responsiveness.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
change-in-control
|
|
◾
|
|
Single- or modified-single-trigger cash severance;
|
|
◾
|
|
Single-trigger acceleration of unvested equity awards;
|
|
◾
|
|
Full acceleration of equity awards granted shortly before the change in control;
|
|
◾
|
|
Acceleration of performance awards above the target level of performance without compelling rationale;
|
|
◾
|
|
Excessive cash severance (generally >3x base salary and bonus);
|
|
◾
|
|
Excise tax
gross-ups
triggered and payable;
|
|
◾
|
|
Excessive golden parachute payments (on an absolute basis or as a percentage of transaction equity value); or
|
|
◾
|
|
Recent amendments that incorporate any problematic features (such as those above) or recent actions (such as extraordinary equity grants) that may make packages so attractive as to influence merger agreements that may not be in the best interests of shareholders; or
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s assertion that a proposed transaction is conditioned on shareholder approval of the golden parachute advisory vote.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
42 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
14
depending on a combination of certain plan features and equity grant practices, where positive factors may counterbalance negative factors, and vice versa, as evaluated using an “Equity Plan Scorecard” (EPSC) approach with three pillars:
|
|
◾
|
|
Plan Cost:
|
|
◾
|
|
SVT based on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants, plus outstanding unvested/unexercised grants; and
|
|
◾
|
|
SVT based only on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants.
|
|
◾
|
|
Plan Features:
|
|
◾
|
|
Quality of disclosure around vesting upon a change in control (CIC);
|
|
◾
|
|
Discretionary vesting authority;
|
|
◾
|
|
Liberal share recycling on various award types;
|
|
◾
|
|
Lack of minimum vesting period for grants made under the plan;
|
|
◾
|
|
Dividends payable prior to award vesting.
|
|
◾
|
|
Grant Practices:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s three-year burn rate relative to its industry/market cap peers;
|
|
◾
|
|
Vesting requirements in CEO’s recent equity grants
(3-year
look-back);
|
|
◾
|
|
The estimated duration of the plan (based on the sum of shares remaining available and the new shares requested, divided by the average annual shares granted in the prior three years);
|
|
◾
|
|
The proportion of the CEO’s most recent equity grants/awards subject to performance conditions;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company maintains a sufficient claw-back policy;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company maintains sufficient post-exercise/vesting share-holding requirements.
|
|
◾
|
|
Awards may vest in connection with a liberal
change-of-control
|
|
◾
|
|
The plan would permit repricing or cash buyout of underwater options without shareholder approval (either by expressly permitting it – for NYSE and Nasdaq listed companies – or by not prohibiting it when the company has a history of repricing – for
non-listed
companies);
|
|
◾
|
|
The plan is a vehicle for problematic pay practices or a significant
pay-for-performance
|
|
◾
|
|
The plan is excessively dilutive to shareholders’ holdings;
|
|
◾
|
|
The plan contains an evergreen (automatic share replenishment) feature; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Any other plan features are determined to have a significant negative impact on shareholder interests.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
43 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Amend the terms of outstanding options or SARs to reduce the exercise price of such outstanding options or SARs;
|
|
◾
|
|
Cancel outstanding options or SARs in exchange for options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original options or SARs;
|
|
◾
|
|
Cancel underwater options in exchange for stock awards; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Provide cash buyouts of underwater options.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
44 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Severity of the
pay-for-performance
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether problematic equity grant practices are driving the misalignment; and/or
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether equity plan awards have been heavily concentrated to the CEO and/or the other NEOs.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Addresses administrative features only; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Seeks approval for Section 162(m) purposes
only
, and the plan administering committee consists entirely of independent directors, per
ISS’ Classification of Directors
. Note that if the company is presenting the plan to shareholders for the first time for any reason (including after the company’s initial public offering), or if the proposal is bundled with other material plan amendments, then the recommendation will be
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Seeks approval for Section 162(m) purposes only, and the plan administering committee does not consist entirely of independent directors, per
ISS’ Classification of Directors
.
|
|
◾
|
|
If the proposal requests additional shares and/or the amendments include a term extension or addition of full value awards as an award type, the recommendation will be based on the Equity Plan Scorecard evaluation as well as an analysis of the overall impact of the amendments.
|
|
◾
|
|
If the plan is being presented to shareholders for the first time (including after the company’s IPO), whether or not additional shares are being requested, the recommendation will be based on the Equity Plan Scorecard evaluation as well as an analysis of the overall impact of any amendments.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
45 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
If there is no request for additional shares and the amendments do not include a term extension or addition of full value awards as an award type, then the recommendation will be based entirely on an analysis of the overall impact of the amendments, and the EPSC evaluation will be shown only for informational purposes.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Purchase price is at least 85 percent of fair market value;
|
|
◾
|
|
Offering period is 27 months or less; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The number of shares allocated to the plan is 10 percent or less of the outstanding shares.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Broad-based participation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Limits on employee contribution, which may be a fixed dollar amount or expressed as a percent of base salary;
|
|
◾
|
|
Company matching contribution up to 25 percent of employee’s contribution, which is effectively a discount of 20 percent from market value; and
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
46 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
No discount on the stock price on the date of purchase when there is a company matching contribution.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Historic trading patterns--the stock price should not be so volatile that the options are likely to be back
“in-
the-money”
over the near term;
|
|
◾
|
|
Rationale for the
re-pricing--was
the stock price decline beyond management’s control?;
|
|
◾
|
|
Is this a
value-for-value
|
|
◾
|
|
Are surrendered stock options added back to the plan reserve?;
|
|
◾
|
|
Timing--repricing should occur at least one year out from any precipitous drop in company’s stock price;
|
|
◾
|
|
Option vesting--does the new option vest immediately or is there a
black-out
period?;
|
|
◾
|
|
Term of the option--the term should remain the same as that of the replaced option;
|
|
◾
|
|
Exercise price--should be set at fair market or a premium to market;
|
|
◾
|
|
Participants--executive officers and directors must be excluded.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
General Recommendation:
One-time
Transfers: Vote against or withhold from compensation committee members if they fail to submit
one-time
transfers to shareholders for approval.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
47 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Executive officers and
non-employee
directors are excluded from participating;
|
|
◾
|
|
Stock options are purchased by third-party financial institutions at a discount to their fair value using option pricing models such as Black-Scholes or a Binomial Option Valuation or other appropriate financial models; and
|
|
◾
|
|
There is a
two-year
minimum holding period for sale proceeds (cash or stock) for all participants.
|
|
◾
|
|
Eligibility;
|
|
◾
|
|
Vesting;
|
|
◾
|
|
Bid-price;
|
|
◾
|
|
Term of options;
|
|
◾
|
|
Cost of the program and impact of the TSOs on company’s total option expense; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Option repricing policy.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
non-employee
director compensation, based on the following factors:
|
|
◾
|
|
If the equity plan under which
non-employee
director grants are made is on the ballot, whether or not it warrants support; and
|
|
◾
|
|
An assessment of the following qualitative factors:
|
|
◾
|
|
The relative magnitude of director compensation as compared to companies of a similar profile;
|
|
◾
|
|
The presence of problematic pay practices relating to director compensation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Director stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements;
|
|
◾
|
|
Equity award vesting schedules;
|
|
◾
|
|
The mix of cash and equity-based compensation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Meaningful limits on director compensation;
|
|
◾
|
|
The availability of retirement benefits or perquisites; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The quality of disclosure surrounding director compensation.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
non-employee
directors, based on:
|
|
◾
|
|
The total estimated cost of the company’s equity plans relative to industry/market cap peers, measured by the company’s estimated Shareholder Value Transfer (SVT) based on new shares requested plus shares remaining for future grants, plus outstanding unvested/unexercised grants;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s three-year burn rate relative to its industry/market cap peers (in certain circumstances); and
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
48 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
The presence of any egregious plan features (such as an option repricing provision or liberal CIC vesting risk).
|
|
◾
|
|
The relative magnitude of director compensation as compared to companies of a similar profile;
|
|
◾
|
|
The presence of problematic pay practices relating to director compensation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Director stock ownership guidelines and holding requirements;
|
|
◾
|
|
Equity award vesting schedules;
|
|
◾
|
|
The mix of cash and equity-based compensation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Meaningful limits on director compensation;
|
|
◾
|
|
The availability of retirement benefits or perquisites; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The quality of disclosure surrounding director compensation.
|
|
General Recommendation:
non-employee
directors. Vote for shareholder proposals to eliminate retirement plans for
non-employee
directors.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s past practices regarding equity and cash compensation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has a holding period or stock ownership requirements in place, such as a meaningful retention ratio (at least 50 percent for full tenure); and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has a rigorous claw-back policy in place.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
49 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The percentage/ratio of net shares required to be retained;
|
|
◾
|
|
The time period required to retain the shares;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has equity retention, holding period, and/or stock ownership requirements in place and the robustness of such requirements;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has any other policies aimed at mitigating risk taking by executives;
|
|
◾
|
|
Executives’ actual stock ownership and the degree to which it meets or exceeds the proponent’s suggested holding period/retention ratio or the company’s existing requirements; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Problematic pay practices, current and past, which may demonstrate a short-term versus long-term focus.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
non-executive
employees. The following factors will be considered:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current level of disclosure of its executive compensation setting process, including how the company considers pay disparity;
|
|
◾
|
|
If any problematic pay practices or
pay-for-performance
|
|
◾
|
|
The level of shareholder support for the company’s pay programs.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
First, vote for shareholder proposals advocating the use of performance-based equity awards, such as performance contingent options or restricted stock, indexed options or premium-priced options, unless the proposal is overly restrictive or if the company has demonstrated that it is using a “substantial” portion of performance-based awards for its top executives. Standard stock options and performance-accelerated awards do not meet the criteria to be considered as performance-based awards. Further, premium-priced options should have a meaningful premium to be considered performance-based awards.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
50 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Second, assess the rigor of the company’s performance-based equity program. If the bar set for the performance-based program is too low based on the company’s historical or peer group comparison, generally vote for the proposal. Furthermore, if target performance results in an above target payout, vote for the shareholder proposal due to program’s poor design. If the company does not disclose the performance metric of the performance-based equity program, vote for the shareholder proposal regardless of the outcome of the first step to the test.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
pay-for-superior
|
|
◾
|
|
Set compensation targets for the plan’s annual and long-term incentive pay components at or below the peer group median;
|
|
◾
|
|
Deliver a majority of the plan’s target long-term compensation through performance-vested, not simply time- vested, equity awards;
|
|
◾
|
|
Provide the strategic rationale and relative weightings of the financial and
non-financial
performance metrics or criteria used in the annual and performance-vested long-term incentive components of the plan;
|
|
◾
|
|
Establish performance targets for each plan financial metric relative to the performance of the company’s peer companies;
|
|
◾
|
|
Limit payment under the annual and performance-vested long-term incentive components of the plan to when the company’s performance on its selected financial performance metrics exceeds peer group median performance.
|
|
◾
|
|
What aspects of the company’s annual and long-term equity incentive programs are performance driven?
|
|
◾
|
|
If the annual and long-term equity incentive programs are performance driven, are the performance criteria and hurdle rates disclosed to shareholders or are they benchmarked against a disclosed peer group?
|
|
◾
|
|
Can shareholders assess the correlation between pay and performance based on the current disclosure?
|
|
◾
|
|
What type of industry and stage of business cycle does the company belong to?
|
|
General Recommendation:
(10b5-1
plans) for executives. These principles include:
|
|
◾
|
|
Adoption, amendment, or termination of a
10b5-1
Plan must be disclosed within two business days in a
Form 8-K;
|
|
◾
|
|
Amendment or early termination of a
10b5-1
Plan is allowed only under extraordinary circumstances, as determined by the board;
|
|
◾
|
|
Ninety days must elapse between adoption or amendment of a
10b5-1
Plan and initial trading under the plan;
|
|
◾
|
|
Reports on Form 4 must identify transactions made pursuant to a
10b5-1
Plan;
|
|
◾
|
|
An executive may not trade in company stock outside the
10b5-1
Plan;
|
|
◾
|
|
Trades under a
10b5-1
Plan must be handled by a broker who does not handle other securities transactions for the executive.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
51 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
If the company has adopted a formal recoupment policy;
|
|
◾
|
|
The rigor of the recoupment policy focusing on how and under what circumstances the company may recoup incentive or stock compensation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has chronic restatement history or material financial problems;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company’s policy substantially addresses the concerns raised by the proponent;
|
|
◾
|
|
Disclosure of recoupment of incentive or stock compensation from senior executives or lack thereof; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Any other relevant factors.
|
|
General Recommendation:
prior
|
|
◾
|
|
The triggering mechanism should be beyond the control of management;
|
|
◾
|
|
The amount should not exceed three times base amount (defined as the average annual taxable
W-2
compensation during the five years prior to the year in which the change of control occurs);
|
|
◾
|
|
Change-in-control
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The frequency and timing of the company’s share buybacks;
|
|
◾
|
|
The use of
per-share
metrics in incentive plans;
|
|
◾
|
|
The effect of recent buybacks on incentive metric results and payouts; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether there is any indication of metric result manipulation.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
52 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
gross-up
payments to executives, except in situations where
gross-ups
are provided pursuant to a plan, policy, or arrangement applicable to management employees of the company, such as a relocation or expatriate tax equalization policy.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current treatment of equity upon employment termination and/or in
change-in-control
|
|
◾
|
|
Current employment agreements, including potential poor pay practices such as
gross-ups
embedded in those agreements.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
53 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
54 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case,
|
|
◾
|
|
If the issues presented in the proposal are more appropriately or effectively dealt with through legislation or government regulation;
|
|
◾
|
|
If the company has already responded in an appropriate and sufficient manner to the issue(s) raised in the proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the proposal’s request is unduly burdensome (scope or timeframe) or overly prescriptive;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s approach compared with any industry standard practices for addressing the issue(s) raised by the proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether there are significant controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation associated with the company’s environmental or social practices;
|
|
◾
|
|
If the proposal requests increased disclosure or greater transparency, whether reasonable and sufficient information is currently available to shareholders from the company or from other publicly available sources; and
|
|
◾
|
|
If the proposal requests increased disclosure or greater transparency, whether implementation would reveal proprietary or confidential information that could place the company at a competitive disadvantage.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has already published a set of animal welfare standards and monitors compliance;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s standards are comparable to industry peers; and
|
|
◾
|
|
There are no recent significant fines, litigation, or controversies related to the company’s and/or its suppliers’ treatment of animals.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
55 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company is conducting animal testing programs that are unnecessary or not required by regulation;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company is conducting animal testing when suitable alternatives are commonly accepted and used by industry peers; or
|
|
◾
|
|
There are recent, significant fines or litigation related to the company’s treatment of animals.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The potential impact of such labeling on the company’s business;
|
|
◾
|
|
The quality of the company’s disclosure on GE product labeling, related voluntary initiatives, and how this disclosure compares with industry peer disclosure; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Company’s current disclosure on the feasibility of GE product labeling.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has adequately disclosed mechanisms in place to prevent abuses;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has adequately disclosed the financial risks of the products/practices in question;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has been subject to violations of related laws or serious controversies; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Peer companies’ policies/practices in this area.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
56 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The potential for reputational, market, and regulatory risk exposure;
|
|
◾
|
|
Existing disclosure of relevant policies;
|
|
◾
|
|
Deviation from established industry norms;
|
|
◾
|
|
Relevant company initiatives to provide research and/or products to disadvantaged consumers;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the proposal focuses on specific products or geographic regions;
|
|
◾
|
|
The potential burden and scope of the requested report;
|
|
◾
|
|
Recent significant controversies, litigation, or fines at the company.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company already discloses similar information through existing reports such as a supplier code of conduct and/or a sustainability report;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has formally committed to the implementation of a toxic/hazardous materials and/or product safety and supply chain reporting and monitoring program based on industry norms or similar standards within a specified time frame; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has not been recently involved in relevant significant controversies, fines, or litigation.
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current level of disclosure regarding its product safety policies, initiatives, and oversight mechanisms;
|
|
◾
|
|
Current regulations in the markets in which the company operates; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Recent significant controversies, litigation, or fines stemming from toxic/hazardous materials at the company.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Recent related fines, controversies, or significant litigation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company complies with relevant laws and regulations on the marketing of tobacco;
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
57 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company’s advertising restrictions deviate from those of industry peers;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company entered into the Master Settlement Agreement, which restricts marketing of tobacco to youth; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether restrictions on marketing to youth extend to foreign countries.
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company complies with all laws and regulations;
|
|
◾
|
|
The degree that voluntary restrictions beyond those mandated by law might hurt the company’s competitiveness; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The risk of any health-related liabilities.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company already provides current, publicly-available information on the impact that climate change may have on the company as well as associated company policies and procedures to address related risks and/or opportunities;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s level of disclosure compared to industry peers; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether there are significant controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation associated with the company’s climate change-related performance.
|
|
◾
|
|
The company already discloses current, publicly-available information on the impacts that GHG emissions may have on the company as well as associated company policies and procedures to address related risks and/or opportunities;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s level of disclosure is comparable to that of industry peers; and
|
|
◾
|
|
There are no significant, controversies, fines, penalties, or litigation associated with the company’s GHG emissions.
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company provides disclosure of year-over-year GHG emissions performance data;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether company disclosure lags behind industry peers;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s actual GHG emissions performance;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current GHG emission policies, oversight mechanisms, and related initiatives; and
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
58 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has been the subject of recent, significant violations, fines, litigation, or controversy related to GHG emissions.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company complies with applicable energy efficiency regulations and laws, and discloses its participation in energy efficiency policies and programs, including disclosure of benchmark data, targets, and performance measures; or
|
|
◾
|
|
The proponent requests adoption of specific energy efficiency goals within specific timelines.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The scope and structure of the proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current level of disclosure on renewable energy use and GHG emissions; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s disclosure of policies, practices, and oversight implemented to manage GHG emissions and mitigate climate change risks.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The gender and racial minority representation of the company’s board is reasonably inclusive in relation to companies of similar size and business; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The board already reports on its nominating procedures and gender and racial minority initiatives on the board and within the company.
|
|
◾
|
|
The degree of existing gender and racial minority diversity on the company’s board and among its executive officers;
|
|
◾
|
|
The level of gender and racial minority representation that exists at the company’s industry peers;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s established process for addressing gender and racial minority board representation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the proposal includes an overly prescriptive request to amend nominating committee charter language;
|
|
◾
|
|
The independence of the company’s nominating committee;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company uses an outside search firm to identify potential director nominees; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has had recent controversies, fines, or litigation regarding equal employment practices.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
59 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
EEO-1
data, unless:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company publicly discloses equal opportunity policies and initiatives in a comprehensive manner;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company already publicly discloses comprehensive workforce diversity data; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has no recent significant
EEO-related
violations or litigation.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current policies and disclosure related to both its diversity and inclusion policies and practices and its compensation philosophy on fair and equitable compensation practices;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has been the subject of recent controversy, litigation, or regulatory actions related to gender, race, or ethnicity pay gap issues; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company’s reporting regarding gender, race, or ethnicity pay gap policies or initiatives is lagging its peers.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current level of disclosure of its workplace health and safety performance data, health and safety management policies, initiatives, and oversight mechanisms;
|
|
◾
|
|
The nature of the company’s business, specifically regarding company and employee exposure to health and safety risks;
|
|
◾
|
|
Recent significant controversies, fines, or violations related to workplace health and safety; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s workplace health and safety performance relative to industry peers.
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s compliance with applicable regulations and guidelines;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current level of disclosure regarding its security and safety policies, procedures, and compliance monitoring; and
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
60 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
The existence of recent, significant violations, fines, or controversy regarding the safety and security of the company’s operations and/or facilities.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Current disclosure of applicable policies and risk assessment report(s) and risk management procedures;
|
|
◾
|
|
The impact of regulatory
non-compliance,
litigation, remediation, or reputational loss that may be associated with failure to manage the company’s operations in question, including the management of relevant community and stakeholder relations;
|
|
◾
|
|
The nature, purpose, and scope of the company’s operations in the specific region(s);
|
|
◾
|
|
The degree to which company policies and procedures are consistent with industry norms; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The scope of the resolution.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current level of disclosure of relevant policies and oversight mechanisms;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current level of such disclosure relative to its industry peers;
|
|
◾
|
|
Potential relevant local, state, or national regulatory developments; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Controversies, fines, or litigation related to the company’s hydraulic fracturing operations.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
Operations in the specified regions are not permitted by current laws or regulations;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company does not currently have operations or plans to develop operations in these protected regions; or
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s disclosure of its operations and environmental policies in these regions is comparable to industry peers.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The nature of the company’s business;
|
|
◾
|
|
The current level of disclosure of the company’s existing related programs;
|
|
◾
|
|
The timetable and methods of program implementation prescribed by the proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s ability to address the issues raised in the proposal; and
|
|
◾
|
|
How the company’s recycling programs compare to similar programs of its industry peers.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company already discloses similar information through existing reports or policies such as an environment, health, and safety (EHS) report; a comprehensive code of corporate conduct; and/or a diversity report; or
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
61 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has formally committed to the implementation of a reporting program based on Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) guidelines or a similar standard within a specified time frame.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current disclosure of relevant policies, initiatives, oversight mechanisms, and water usage metrics;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether or not the company’s existing water-related policies and practices are consistent with relevant internationally recognized standards and national/local regulations;
|
|
◾
|
|
The potential financial impact or risk to the company associated with water-related concerns or issues; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Recent, significant company controversies, fines, or litigation regarding water use by the company and its suppliers.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The level of disclosure of company policies and procedures relating to data security, privacy, freedom of speech, information access and management, and Internet censorship;
|
|
◾
|
|
Engagement in dialogue with governments or relevant groups with respect to data security, privacy, or the free flow of information on the Internet;
|
|
◾
|
|
The scope of business involvement and of investment in countries whose governments censor or monitor the Internet and other telecommunications;
|
|
◾
|
|
Applicable market-specific laws or regulations that may be imposed on the company; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Controversies, fines, or litigation related to data security, privacy, freedom of speech, or Internet censorship.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The scope and prescriptive nature of the proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has significant and/or persistent controversies or regulatory violations regarding social and/or environmental issues;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has management systems and oversight mechanisms in place regarding its social and environmental performance;
|
|
◾
|
|
The degree to which industry peers have incorporated similar
non-financial
performance criteria in their executive compensation practices; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current level of disclosure regarding its environmental and social performance.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
62 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The degree to which existing relevant policies and practices are disclosed;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether or not existing relevant policies are consistent with internationally recognized standards;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether company facilities and those of its suppliers are monitored and how;
|
|
◾
|
|
Company participation in fair labor organizations or other internationally recognized human rights initiatives;
|
|
◾
|
|
Scope and nature of business conducted in markets known to have higher risk of workplace labor/human rights abuse;
|
|
◾
|
|
Recent, significant company controversies, fines, or litigation regarding human rights at the company or its suppliers;
|
|
◾
|
|
The scope of the request; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Deviation from industry sector peer company standards and practices.
|
|
◾
|
|
The degree to which existing relevant policies and practices are disclosed, including information on the implementation of these policies and any related oversight mechanisms;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s industry and whether the company or its suppliers operate in countries or areas where there is a history of human rights concerns;
|
|
◾
|
|
Recent significant controversies, fines, or litigation regarding human rights involving the company or its suppliers, and whether the company has taken remedial steps; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the proposal is unduly burdensome or overly prescriptive.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The nature, purpose, and scope of the operations and business involved that could be affected by social or political disruption;
|
|
◾
|
|
Current disclosure of applicable risk assessment(s) and risk management procedures;
|
|
◾
|
|
Compliance with U.S. sanctions and laws;
|
|
◾
|
|
Consideration of other international policies, standards, and laws; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the company has been recently involved in recent, significant controversies, fines, or litigation related to its operations in “high-risk” markets.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Controversies surrounding operations in the relevant market(s);
|
|
◾
|
|
The value of the requested report to shareholders;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current level of disclosure of relevant information on outsourcing and plant closure procedures; and
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
63 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s existing human rights standards relative to industry peers.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s current disclosure of relevant lobbying policies, and management and board oversight;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s disclosure regarding trade associations or other groups that it supports, or is a member of, that engage in lobbying activities; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Recent significant controversies, fines, or litigation regarding the company’s lobbying-related activities.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s policies, and management and board oversight related to its direct political contributions and payments to trade associations or other groups that may be used for political purposes;
|
|
◾
|
|
The company’s disclosure regarding its support of, and participation in, trade associations or other groups that may make political contributions; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Recent significant controversies, fines, or litigation related to the company’s political contributions or political activities.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
There are no recent, significant controversies, fines, or litigation regarding the company’s political contributions or trade association spending; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has procedures in place to ensure that employee contributions to company-sponsored political action committees (PACs) are strictly voluntary and prohibit coercion.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
64 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
65 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Past performance as a
closed-end
fund;
|
|
◾
|
|
Market in which the fund invests;
|
|
◾
|
|
Measures taken by the board to address the discount; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Past shareholder activism, board activity, and votes on related proposals.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Past performance relative to its peers;
|
|
◾
|
|
Market in which the fund invests;
|
|
◾
|
|
Measures taken by the board to address the issues;
|
|
◾
|
|
Past shareholder activism, board activity, and votes on related proposals;
|
|
◾
|
|
Strategy of the incumbents versus the dissidents;
|
|
◾
|
|
Independence of directors;
|
|
◾
|
|
Experience and skills of director candidates;
|
|
◾
|
|
Governance profile of the company;
|
|
◾
|
|
Evidence of management entrenchment.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Proposed and current fee schedules;
|
|
◾
|
|
Fund category/investment objective;
|
|
◾
|
|
Performance benchmarks;
|
|
◾
|
|
Share price performance as compared with peers;
|
|
◾
|
|
Resulting fees relative to peers;
|
|
◾
|
|
Assignments (where the advisor undergoes a change of control).
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Stated specific financing purpose;
|
|
◾
|
|
Possible dilution for common shares;
|
|
◾
|
|
Whether the shares can be used for antitakeover purposes.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
66 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Potential competitiveness;
|
|
◾
|
|
Regulatory developments;
|
|
◾
|
|
Current and potential returns; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Current and potential risk.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
non-fundamental
restriction, considering the following factors:
|
|
◾
|
|
The fund’s target investments;
|
|
◾
|
|
The reasons given by the fund for the change; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The projected impact of the change on the portfolio.
|
|
General Recommendation:
non-fundamental.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Political/economic changes in the target market;
|
|
◾
|
|
Consolidation in the target market; and
|
|
◾
|
|
Current asset composition.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
sub-classification,
considering the following factors:
|
|
◾
|
|
Potential competitiveness;
|
|
◾
|
|
Current and potential returns;
|
|
◾
|
|
Risk of concentration;
|
|
◾
|
|
Consolidation in target industry.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
◾
|
|
The proposal to allow share issuances below NAV has an expiration date no more than one year from the date shareholders approve the underlying proposal, as required under the Investment Company Act of 1940;
|
|
◾
|
|
The sale is deemed to be in the best interests of shareholders by (1) a majority of the company’s independent directors and (2) a majority of the company’s directors who have no financial interest in the issuance; and
|
|
◾
|
|
The company has demonstrated responsible past use of share issuances by either:
|
|
◾
|
|
Outperforming peers in its
8-digit
GICS group as measured by
one-
and three-year median TSRs; or
|
|
◾
|
|
Providing disclosure that its past share issuances were priced at levels that resulted in only small or moderate discounts to NAV and economic dilution to existing
non-participating
shareholders.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
67 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Strategies employed to salvage the company;
|
|
◾
|
|
The fund’s past performance;
|
|
◾
|
|
The terms of the liquidation.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
The degree of change implied by the proposal;
|
|
◾
|
|
The efficiencies that could result;
|
|
◾
|
|
The state of incorporation;
|
|
◾
|
|
Regulatory standards and implications.
|
|
◾
|
|
Removal of shareholder approval requirement to reorganize or terminate the trust or any of its series;
|
|
◾
|
|
Removal of shareholder approval requirement for amendments to the new declaration of trust;
|
|
◾
|
|
Removal of shareholder approval requirement to amend the fund’s management contract, allowing the contract to be modified by the investment manager and the trust management, as permitted by the 1940 Act;
|
|
◾
|
|
Allow the trustees to impose other fees in addition to sales charges on investment in a fund, such as deferred sales charges and redemption fees that may be imposed upon redemption of a fund’s shares;
|
|
◾
|
|
Removal of shareholder approval requirement to engage in and terminate subadvisory arrangements;
|
|
◾
|
|
Removal of shareholder approval requirement to change the domicile of the fund.
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
re-incorporations,
considering the following factors:
|
|
◾
|
|
Regulations of both states;
|
|
◾
|
|
Required fundamental policies of both states;
|
|
◾
|
|
The increased flexibility available.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Fees charged to comparably sized funds with similar objectives;
|
|
◾
|
|
The proposed distributor’s reputation and past performance;
|
|
◾
|
|
The competitiveness of the fund in the industry;
|
|
◾
|
|
The terms of the agreement.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
68 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Resulting fee structure;
|
|
◾
|
|
Performance of both funds;
|
|
◾
|
|
Continuity of management personnel;
|
|
◾
|
|
Changes in corporate governance and their impact on shareholder rights.
|
|
General Recommendation:
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
General Recommendation:
case-by-case
|
|
◾
|
|
Performance of the fund’s Net Asset Value (NAV);
|
|
◾
|
|
The fund’s history of shareholder relations;
|
|
◾
|
|
The performance of other funds under the advisor’s management.
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
69 of 70
|
|
U N I T E D S T A T E S
P R O X Y V O T I N G G U I D E L I N E S
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I S S G O V E R N A N C E . C O M
|
|
|
70 of 70
|
|
MAI-FINC-1020D
|
(a)(1)
|
|
|
(a)(2)
|
|
|
(a)(3)
|
|
|
(a)(4)
|
|
|
(a)(5)
|
|
|
(a)(6)
|
|
|
(a)(7)
|
|
|
(a)(8)
|
|
|
(a)(9)
|
|
|
(a)(10)
|
|
|
(a)(11)
|
|
|
(a)(12)
|
|
|
(a)(13)
|
|
|
(a)(14)
|
|
|
(a)(15)
|
|
|
(a)(16)
|
|
|
(a)(17)
|
|
|
(a)(18)
|
|
|
(a)(19)
|
|
|
(a)(20)
|
|
(a)(21)
|
|
|
(a)(22)
|
|
|
(a)(23)
|
|
|
(a)(24)
|
|
|
(a)(25)
|
|
|
(a)(26)
|
|
|
(a)(27)
|
|
|
(a)(28)
|
|
|
(a)(29)
|
|
|
(a)(30)
|
|
|
(a)(31)
|
|
|
(a)(32)
|
|
|
(a)(33)
|
|
|
(a)(34)
|
|
|
(a)(35)
|
|
Articles of Amendment regarding reorganization of Nuveen Core Bond Fund, Nuveen Core Plus Bond Fund, Nuveen Inflation Protected Securities Fund and Nuveen Short Term Bond Fund into TIAA-CREF Bond Fund, TIAA-CREF Bond Plus Fund, TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund and TIAA-CREF Short-Term Bond Fund, respectively, dated June
13, 2019, is incorporated by reference to post-effective amendment no. 228 filed on July
29, 2019, on Form
for Registrant.
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(d)(1)
|
|
|
(d)(2)
|
|
|
(d)(3)
|
|
|
(d)(4)
|
|
|
(d)(5)
|
|
|
(d)(6)
|
|
|
(d)(7)
|
|
|
(d)(8)
|
|
|
(e)(1)
|
|
|
(e)(2)
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(g)(1)
|
|
|
(g)(2)
|
|
|
(h)(1)
|
|
|
(h)(2)
|
|
(h)(3)
|
|
|
(h)(4)
|
|
|
(i)
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(j)
|
|
|
(k)
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(l)
|
|
Not applicable.
|
(m)
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
|
(o)
|
|
Reserved.
|
(p)(1)
|
|
|
(p)(2)
|
|
|
(q)
|
|
|
Name and Position with Nuveen Fund Advisors
|
|
Other Business, Profession, Vocation or
Employment During Past Two Years |
Joseph T. Castro, Senior Managing Director
|
|
Senior Managing Director (since February 2017), Head of Compliance (since 2013) of Nuveen, LLC; Senior Managing Director (since 2017) of Nuveen Services, LLC.
|
Erik Mogavero, Managing Director and Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Formerly employed by Deutsche Bank (2013-August 2017) as Managing Director, Head of Asset Management and Wealth Management Compliance for the Americas region and Chief Compliance Officer of Deutsche Investment Management Americas.
|
Name and Position with Nuveen Fund Advisors
|
|
Other Business, Profession, Vocation or
Employment During Past Two Years |
Michael A. Perry, Executive Vice President
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer (since April 2019), formerly, Executive Vice President (2017-2019), Managing Director (2015-2017) of Nuveen Securities, LLC and Executive Vice President (since 2017) of Nuveen Alternative Investments, LLC.
|
Austin P. Wachter, Managing Director and Controller
|
|
Senior Managing Director and Controller of Nuveen Securities, LLC (since 2018); Managing Director and Controller (since 2017) (formerly, Assistant Treasurer and Assistant Controller) of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC; Controller (since 2017) of Nuveen Investments, Inc., Nuveen Alternative Investments, LLC, Nuveen Alternatives Advisors LLC, Nuveen Finance, LLC, Nuveen Services, LLC, NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC, Symphony Asset Management LLC and Winslow Capital Management, LLC; Controller (since 2014) of Nuveen, LLC; Controller (since 2016), formerly, Vice President and Funds Treasurer (2014-2016) of Teachers Advisors, LLC; Controller (since 2016), formerly, Senior Director and Funds Treasurer
(2014-2016)
of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America.
|
Name
|
|
Position and Offices with
Nuveen Asset Management |
|
Other Business, Profession, Vocation or
Employment During Past Two Years |
William T. Huffman
|
|
President
|
|
None
|
Stuart J. Cohen
|
|
Managing Director and Head of Legal
|
|
Managing Director and Assistant Secretary (since 2002) of Nuveen Securities, LLC; Managing Director (since 2007) and Assistant Secretary (since 2003) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC.
|
Name
|
|
Position and Offices with
Nuveen Asset Management |
|
Other Business, Profession, Vocation or
Employment During Past Two Years |
Diane S. Meggs
|
|
Managing Director and Chief Compliance Officer
|
|
Managing Director and Compliance Manager (since 2011) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Chief Compliance Officer and Managing Director (since 2013) of Nuveen Investments Advisers, LLC.
|
Austin P. Wachter
|
|
Managing Director and Controller
|
|
Senior Managing Director and Controller of Nuveen Securities, LLC (since 2018); Managing Director and Controller (since 2017) formerly, Assistant Controller and Vice President (2016-2017) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Controller (since 2017) of Nuveen Investments, Inc., Nuveen Alternative Investments, LLC, Nuveen Alternatives Advisors LLC, Nuveen Finance, LLC, Nuveen Services, LLC, NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC, Symphony Asset Management LLC and Winslow Capital Management, LLC; Controller (since 2014) of Nuveen, LLC; Controller (since 2016), formerly, Vice President and Funds Treasurer (2014-2016) of Teachers Advisors, LLC; Controller (since 2016), formerly, Senior Director and Funds Treasurer
(2014-2016)
of Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America.
|
Name and Principal
Business Address |
|
Positions and Offices
with Nuveen Securities |
|
Positions and Offices
with Registrant |
Deann D. Morgan
100 Park Avenue
New York, NY 10016
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer
|
|
Vice President
|
Michael A. Perry
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
|
Co-Chief Executive Officer
|
|
None
|
Erin Culek
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
None
|
Name and Principal
Business Address |
|
Positions and Offices
with Nuveen Securities |
|
Positions and Offices
with Registrant |
William Huffman
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
None
|
Kevin J. McCarthy
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 |
|
Senior Managing Director and Assistant Secretary
|
|
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
|
Christopher M. Rohrbacher
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 |
|
Managing Director and Assistant Secretary
|
|
Vice President and Secretary
|
Lucas A. Satre
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 |
|
Managing Director, Secretary and General Counsel
|
|
None
|
Gifford R. Zimmerman
333 West Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60606 |
|
Managing Director and Assistant Secretary
|
|
Vice President and Assistant Secretary
|
NUVEEN INVESTMENT FUNDS, INC.
|
||
By:
|
|
/s/ CHRISTOPHER M. ROHRBACHER
|
|
Christopher M. Rohrbacher
|
|
|
Vice President and Secretary
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/S/ E. SCOTT WICKERHAM
E. SCOTT WICKERHAM
|
|
Vice President and Controller (principal financial and accounting officer)
|
|
|
|
October 28, 2020
|
||
/S/ GREG A. BOTTJER
GREG A. BOTTJER
|
|
Chief Administrative Officer (principal executive officer)
|
|
|
|
October 28, 2020
|
||
TERENCE J. TOTH*
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Director
|
|
ü
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ý
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
ï
þ
|
|
By:
|
|
/S/ CHRISTOPHER M. ROHRBACHER
CHRISTOPHER M. ROHRBACHER
Attorney-in-Fact
October 28, 2020
|
JACK B. EVANS*
|
|
Director
|
||||||
WILLIAM C. HUNTER*
|
|
Director
|
||||||
ALBIN F.MOSCHNER*
|
|
Director
|
||||||
JOHN K. NELSON*
|
|
Director
|
||||||
JUDITH M. STOCKDALE*
|
|
Director
|
||||||
CAROLE E. STONE*
|
|
Director
|
|
|||||
MARGARET L. WOLFF*
|
|
Director
|
|
|||||
ROBERT L. YOUNG*
|
|
Director
|
|
*
|
An original power of attorney authorizing, among others, Kevin J. McCarthy, Christopher M. Rohrbacher and Gifford R. Zimmerman to execute this registration statement, and amendments thereto, for each of the directors of the Registrant on whose behalf this registration statement is filed, has been executed and has previously been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is incorporated by reference herein.
|
Exhibit
|
|
Exhibit
|
Number
|
|
|
(h)(4)
|
|
Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the Nuveen Funds and State Street Bank and Trust Company, dated August 12, 2020.
|
(j)
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated October 26, 2020.
|
101.INS
|
|
XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear on the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
|
101.SCH
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
|
101.CAL
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
|
101.DEF
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
|
101.LAB
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
|
101.PRE
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
|
SECURITIES LENDING AUTHORIZATION AGREEMENT
Between
EACH NUVEEN REGISTERED INVESTMENT COMPANY LISTED ON SCHEDULE C
And
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
Table of Contents |
Page | |||
1. Definitions. |
1 | |||
2. Appointment of State Street. |
3 | |||
3. Securities to be Loaned. |
3 | |||
4. Borrowers. |
4 | |||
5. Securities Loan Agreements. |
4 | |||
6. Loans of Available Securities. |
4 | |||
7. Distributions on and Voting Rights with Respect to Loaned Securities. |
5 | |||
8. Collateral. |
6 | |||
9. Investment of Cash Collateral; Compensation; Grant of Security Interest. |
7 | |||
10. Fee Disclosure. |
9 | |||
11. Recordkeeping, Reports and Audits. |
9 | |||
12. Standard of Care and Indemnification. |
10 | |||
13. Representations and Warranties. |
11 | |||
14. Borrower Default Indemnification. |
12 | |||
15. Continuing Agreement; Termination; Remedies. |
13 | |||
16. Notices. |
14 | |||
17. Securities Investors Protection Act of 1970 Notice. |
15 | |||
18. Authorized Representatives. |
15 | |||
19. Agents. |
15 | |||
20. Force Majeure. |
15 | |||
21. Miscellaneous. |
15 | |||
22. Confidentiality. |
16 | |||
23. Opt-In to U.S. Special Resolution Regimes. |
16 | |||
24. Counterparts. |
17 | |||
25. Amendments. |
18 | |||
26. Separate Agreements. |
18 | |||
27. Business Continuity. |
18 |
28. Information Security. |
18 |
EXHIBITS AND SCHEDULES
SCHEDULE A (Fee Split)
SCHEDULE B (Cash Collateral Investment)
SCHEDULE C (List of Funds)
SCHEDULE D (Schedule of Borrowers)
SCHEDULE E (Lending Restrictions)
SCHEDULE F (Schedule of Authorized Representatives)
SCHEDULE G (Schedule of Authorized State Street Representatives)
SCHEDULE H (Acceptable Forms of Collateral)
EXHIBIT A (Special Resolution Regimes)
EXHIBIT B (State Street Client Information Security Addendum)
SECURITIES LENDING AUTHORIZATION AGREEMENT
Agreement dated the 12th day of August , 2020 between each NUVEEN registered investment company listed on Schedule C and organized and existing under the jurisdiction specified in Schedule C (each a Trust), severally and not jointly, and for each Trust with a series, on behalf of each of its series as listed on Schedule C, severally and not jointly, and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, a trust company organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, acting either directly or through any State Street Affiliates (defined below) (collectively, State Street), setting forth the terms and conditions under which State Street is authorized to act on behalf of the respective Trust with respect to the lending of certain securities of a Trust held by State Street as agent, trustee or custodian or by the Funds Third Party Custodian (as defined below).
This Agreement shall be deemed for all purposes to constitute a separate and discrete agreement between State Street and each of the Trusts and each of the series of shares of the respective Trust as listed on Schedule C to this Agreement (each Trust and each series of a Trust, if applicable, is a Fund and collectively, the Funds) as it may be amended by the parties, and no Trust or series of shares of a Trust shall be responsible or liable for any of the obligations of any other Trust or series of a Trust under this Agreement or otherwise, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and of the mutual covenants contained herein, each of the parties hereto does hereby covenant and agree as follows:
1. Definitions. For the purposes hereof:
(a) Agreement means this Securities Lending Authorization Agreement, as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified in accordance herewith from time to time.
(b) Applicable Law means the laws, rules and regulations (including income tax treaties) of any relevant jurisdiction, including published practice of any government or other taxing authority in connection with such laws, rules and regulations.
(c) Authorized Representative means any person reasonably believed by State Street to be an authorized person set forth on Schedule F attached hereto (which Schedule shall be updated promptly by a Fund upon changes to personnel who are authorized to act on the Funds behalf by providing written notice to State Street).
(d) Authorized State Street Representative means any person reasonably believed by the Funds to be an authorized person set forth on Schedule G attached hereto (which Schedule shall be updated promptly by State Street upon changes to personnel who are authorized to act on State Streets behalf by providing written notice to the Funds).
1
(e) Available Securities means the securities of the Funds that are available for Loans pursuant to Section 3.
(f) Borrower means any of the entities to which Available Securities may be loaned under a Securities Loan Agreement, as described in Section 4.
(g) Collateral means cash, securities or letters of credit delivered by a Borrower to secure its obligations under a Securities Loan Agreement.
(h) Fee Income means any fee income received from a Borrower, including, without limitation, negative rebates paid by a Borrower in connection with Loans, premiums in connection with non-cash Collateral and fees in connection with fee for hold or other arrangements.
(i) Investment Manager when used in any provision, means the person or entity that has discretionary authority over the investment of the Available Securities to which the provision applies.
(j) Loan means a loan of Available Securities to a Borrower.
(k) Loaned Security shall mean any security which is delivered as a Loan under a Securities Loan Agreement; provided that, if any new or different security shall be exchanged for any Loaned Security by recapitalization, merger, consolidation, or other corporate action, such new or different security shall, effective upon such exchange, be deemed to become a Loaned Security in substitution for the former Loaned Security for which such exchange was made.
(l) Market Value of a security means the market value of such security (including, in the case of a Loaned Security that is a debt security, the accrued interest on such security) as determined by the independent pricing service designated by State Street, or such other independent sources as may be selected by State Street on a reasonable basis.
(m) Net Investment Income means income (including interest, dividends and realized net capital gains) distributed in respect of the investment of cash Collateral, net of applicable fees, charges and expenses properly charged by the relevant investment vehicle in which such cash Collateral is invested.
(n) Obligations means any and all liabilities and obligations of a Fund to State Street arising under or in respect of this Agreement, whether mature or unmatured, contingent or otherwise, including any obligation of a Fund to pay State Street or to reimburse State Street for any credit, advance, overdraft or other indebtedness of the Fund to State Street under the terms of this Agreement.
(o) Replacement Securities means securities of the same issuer, class and denomination as Loaned Securities.
2
(p) Securities Loan Agreement means the agreement between a Borrower and State Street (on behalf of the Funds) that governs Loans, as described in Section 5, as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified in accordance therewith from time to time.
(q) State Street Affiliate means any entity that directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls State Street Bank and Trust Company or that is controlled by or is under common control with State Street Bank and Trust Company.
(r) Third Party Custodian means any custodian selected by a Fund other than State Street or State Street Affiliate which holds for safekeeping a Funds Available Securities.
2. Appointment of State Street. Each Fund hereby appoints and authorizes State Street as its agent to lend Available Securities to Borrowers in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. State Street shall have the responsibility and authority to do or cause to be done all acts State Street shall determine to be desirable, necessary, or appropriate to implement and administer this securities lending program. Each Fund agrees that State Street is acting as a fully disclosed agent and not as principal in connection with the securities lending program. State Street may take action as agent of the Fund on an undisclosed or a disclosed basis.
Each Fund also appoints and authorizes State Street, as its agent, to enter into fee for hold arrangements with respect to certain Available Securities. State Street, as agent, will, in return for a fee from the Borrower, hold and reserve or direct the Third Party Custodian to hold and reserve certain Available Securities and will refrain from lending such Available Securities to any third party without the Borrowers permission, provided, however, that the fee for hold arrangements shall not restrict or otherwise affect the Funds ownership rights with regard to the Available Securities.
3. Securities to be Loaned.
All of a Funds securities held by State Street or a Third Party Custodian, as custodian of the respective Fund, shall be subject to this securities lending program and constitute Available Securities hereunder, except those securities, which the relevant Fund or the Investment Manager specifically identifies in writing to State Street from time to time as not being Available Securities (such writing hereinafter referred to as the Restricted Securities List). In the absence of any such identification herein or other notices specifically identifying securities as not being Available Securities, State Street shall have no authority or responsibility for determining whether any of a Funds securities should be excluded from the securities lending program.
If applicable, each Fund shall cause its Third Party Custodian to enter into an operational procedures agreement with State Street (the Operational Procedures Agreement) to facilitate the provision of services contemplated by this Agreement. Each Fund acknowledges and agrees that no lending can occur for the Funds using a Third Party Custodian prior to the execution of the Operational Procedures Agreement between Third Party Custodian and State Street and that State Street may in its sole discretion decline to execute an Operational Procedures Agreement with any Third Party Custodian. Each Fund acknowledges and agrees that State Street shall have no liability in respect of any acts of the Third Party Custodian or any losses which result from the failure by the Third Party Custodian to comply
3
with State Streets instructions or the terms of the Operational Procedures Agreement, except to the extent that such losses arise directly from State Streets negligence, bad faith or willful misconduct. Each Fund authorizes and directs State Street and Authorized State Street Representatives to instruct the Third Party Custodian to deliver Available Securities to Borrowers and other persons at the direction of State Street and Authorized State Street Representatives and otherwise follow the directions of State Street and Authorized State Street Representatives in order to put this Agreement into full effect.
4. Borrowers.
Each Fund hereby authorizes State Street to effect Loans of Available Securities of the Fund with any Borrower set forth in Schedule D, attached hereto, as such schedule may be amended or modified from time to time by separate written agreement of State Street and the Funds.
State Street shall not be responsible for any statements, representations, warranties or covenants made by any Borrower in connection with any Loan or for any Borrowers performance of or failure to perform the terms of any Loan under the applicable Securities Loan Agreement or any related agreement, including the failure to make any required payments, except as otherwise expressly provided herein or except to the extent that such losses arise directly from State Streets negligence, fraud or willful misconduct.
5. Securities Loan Agreements. Each Fund authorizes State Street to enter into one or more Securities Loan Agreements, subject to the Lending Restrictions set forth on Schedule E hereto, with such Borrowers as may be selected by State Street and as set forth on Schedule D hereto. Each Securities Loan Agreement shall have such terms and conditions as State Street may negotiate with the Borrower, such terms and conditions being consistent with this Agreement. Certain terms of individual Loans, including rebate fees to be paid to the Borrower for the use of cash Collateral, shall be negotiated at the time a Loan is made but must be consistent with the provisions of this Agreement.
The Fund agrees that the authorization provided hereunder includes the authority to enter into Securities Loan Agreements with Borrowers subject to special resolution regime laws and regulations as described in the attached Exhibit A.
6. Loans of Available Securities. State Street shall be responsible for determining whether any Loan shall be made, and for negotiating and establishing the terms of each such Loan. State Street shall have the authority to terminate any Loan in its discretion, at any time and without prior notice to the Fund. In the event of a default (within the meaning of the applicable Securities Loan Agreement) by a Borrower on any Loan, State Street shall be fully protected in acting in any commercially reasonable manner it deems reasonable and appropriate. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained elsewhere in this Agreement, each Fund also retains the authority and discretion to direct State Street to initiate action to terminate any Loan made under this Agreement at any time (i.e., recall Loaned Securities), by providing written notice to State Street.
4
Each Fund acknowledges that State Street administers securities lending programs for other clients of State Street. State Street will allocate securities lending opportunities among its clients, using methods established by State Street from time to time. State Street does not represent or warrant that any amount or percentage of the Funds Available Securities will in fact be loaned to Borrowers. Each Fund agrees that it shall have no claim against State Street and State Street shall have no liability arising from, based on, or relating to, loans allocated to other clients, or loan opportunities not made available to the Fund, whether or not State Street has made fewer or more loans for any other client, and whether or not any loan allocated to another client, or loan opportunity not made available to the Fund, could have resulted in Loans made under this Agreement.
Each Fund also acknowledges that, under the applicable Securities Loan Agreements, Borrowers will not be required to return Loaned Securities immediately upon receipt of notice from State Street terminating the applicable Loan, but instead will be required to return such Loaned Securities within such period of time following such notice as is specified in the applicable Securities Loan Agreement, and in no event shall such requirement permit returns later than the earlier of the end of the customary settlement period or five (5) business days. Upon receiving a notice from the Fund or the Investment Manager that Available Securities which have been loaned to a Borrower should no longer be considered Available Securities (whether because of the sale of such securities or otherwise), or that the Fund instructs State Street to terminate a Loan for any reason, State Street shall thereafter promptly notify the Borrower which has borrowed such securities that the Loan of such Available Securities is terminated and that such Available Securities are to be returned within the time specified by the applicable Securities Loan Agreement, and in no event later than the earlier of the end of the customary settlement period or five (5) business days.
7. Distributions on and Voting Rights with Respect to Loaned Securities. Except as provided in the next sentence, all substitute interest, dividends, and other distributions paid with respect to Loaned Securities shall be credited to the Funds relevant account on the date such amounts are delivered by the Borrower to State Street. Any non-cash distribution on Loaned Securities which distribution is in the nature of a stock split or a stock dividend shall be added to the Loan (and shall be considered to constitute Loaned Securities) as of the date such non-cash distribution is received by the Borrower; provided that the Fund or Investment Manager may, by giving State Street six (6) business days notice prior to the date of such non-cash distribution, direct State Street to request that the Borrower deliver such non-cash distribution to State Street, pursuant to the applicable Securities Loan Agreement, in which case State Street shall credit such non-cash distribution to the Funds relevant account on the date it is delivered to State Street.
Each Fund acknowledges that it will not be entitled to participate in any dividend reinvestment program or to vote with respect to Available Securities that are on loan on the applicable record date for such Available Securities.
Each Fund also acknowledges that any payments of distributions from Borrower to the Fund are in substitution for the interest or dividend accrued or paid in respect of Loaned Securities and that the tax and accounting treatment of substitute payments may differ from the
5
tax and accounting treatment of such interest or dividend payments if received directly from issuers.
Each Fund also acknowledges that, with respect to payments of distributions from Borrower, the Fund will generally not be entitled to any credits, including foreign tax credits, for any income tax that would normally be withheld at source on actual distributions of income made by the issuer of the Loaned Securities.
Each Fund further acknowledges that, unless otherwise agreed, payments of distributions from Borrower will be determined by reference to Applicable Law as of the date of each payment and no adjustment will be made to amounts paid by Borrower as a result of any retroactive change in Applicable Law that is announced or enacted after the date of the relevant payment or any decision of a court of competent jurisdiction which is made after the date of the relevant payment (other than where such decision results from an action taken with respect to this Agreement or amounts paid or payable under this Agreement).
If an installment, call or rights issue becomes payable on or in respect of any Loaned Securities, State Street shall use all reasonable endeavors to ensure that any timely instructions from the Fund or its Investment Manager are complied with, but State Street shall not be required to make any payment unless the Fund has first placed funds with State Street to make such payment.
Each Fund acknowledges and agrees that, with respect to a dividend paid during the Loan term by a company that is a resident of France, the Fund will not be entitled to receive, either from the French company or the Borrower, any additional dividends (sometimes referred to as complementary coupons) declared and payable by such company that are equivalent to a tax credit adjustment (such as credit dimpot étranger).
Each Fund further acknowledges and agrees that the Fund will be required to accept cash in lieu of fractional shares in all instances in which an issuer does not issue fractional shares.
8. Collateral.
(a) Receipt of Collateral. Each Fund authorizes State Street to receive and to hold, on the Funds behalf, Collateral from Borrowers to secure the obligations of Borrowers with respect to any Loan of Available Securities made on behalf of the Fund pursuant to the Securities Loan Agreements. Concurrently with or prior to the delivery of the Loaned Securities to the Borrower under any Loan, State Street shall receive from the Borrower Collateral in any of the forms listed on Schedule H. Said Schedule may be amended from time to time by separate written agreement of State Street and the Funds. All investments of cash Collateral shall be for the account and at the risk of the Fund.
(b) Marking to Market. The initial Collateral received shall have (depending on the nature of the Loaned Securities and the Collateral received) a value of 102% or 105% of the Market Value of the Loaned Securities, or such other value, but not less than 102% of the Market Value of the Loaned Securities, as may be applicable in the jurisdiction in which such Loaned
6
Securities are customarily traded. Pursuant to the terms of the applicable Securities Loan Agreement, State Street shall, in accordance with State Streets reasonable and customary practices, mark Loaned Securities and Collateral to their Market Value each business day based upon the Market Value of the Collateral and the Loaned Securities at the close of business employing the most recently available pricing information, and ensure that each applicable Securities Loan Agreement shall require each Borrower to deliver additional Collateral to State Street as follows:
(i) In the case of a Loan of U.S. equities or U.S. corporate debt , the Borrower will be required to deliver additional Collateral in the event that the Market Value of the Collateral is less than one hundred and two percent (102%) of the Market Value of the Loaned Securities, and such additional Collateral together with the Collateral previously delivered shall have a Market Value of not less than one hundred and two percent (102%) of the Market Value of the Loaned Securities.
(ii) In the case of a Loan of non-U.S. equities, the Borrower will be required to deliver additional Collateral in the event that the Market Value of the Collateral is less than one hundred and five percent (105%) of the Market Value of the Loaned Securities, and such additional Collateral together with the Collateral previously delivered shall have a Market Value of not less than one hundred and five percent (105%) of the Market Value of the Loaned Securities.
(iii) In the case of a Loan of US government securities (including securities issued by US agencies or instrumentalities), sovereign debt issued by non-US governments, and non-US corporate debt securities, the Borrower will in each case be required to deliver additional Collateral in the event that the Market Value of the Collateral in respect of such Loan is less than one hundred percent (100%) of the Market Value of the Loaned Securities subject to such Loan, and such additional Collateral together with all Collateral previously delivered in respect of such Loan shall have a Market Value of not less than one hundred and two percent (102%) of the Market Value of the Loaned Securities subject to such Loan.
(c) Return of Collateral. The Collateral shall be returned to Borrower at the termination of the Loan upon the return of the Loaned Securities by Borrower to State Street in accordance with the applicable Securities Loan Agreement.
9. Investment of Cash Collateral; Compensation; Grant of Security Interest.
(a) Investment of Cash Collateral. To the extent that a Loan is secured by cash Collateral, such cash Collateral, including money received with respect to the investment of the same, or upon the maturity, sale, or liquidation of any such investments, shall be invested by State Street in accordance with the directions of the Funds as set forth on Schedule B under the heading Cash Collateral Investment. State Street does not assume any market or investment risk of loss associated with any investment of cash Collateral. If upon the maturity, redemption, sale, or liquidation of any such investments of cash Collateral, the amounts so available are
7
insufficient to return any and all amounts due to a Borrower under and pursuant to the applicable Securities Loan Agreement, the Fund shall be responsible for such shortfall.
(b) Cash Collateral Investments Not Guaranteed. Each Fund acknowledges that interests in any collective investment vehicles to which State Street and/or one or more of the State Street Affiliates provide services are not guaranteed or insured by State Street or State Street Affiliates or by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any government agency.
(c) Net Investment Income and Fee Income. Net Investment Income and Fee Income shall be credited to the Funds relevant account, on a monthly basis, only after making the following payments on behalf of the Fund: (i) rebate fees shall be paid to Borrowers in accordance with the applicable Securities Loan Agreements; and (ii) a portion of any remaining Net Investment Income and Fee Income after payment of the amounts set forth in clause (i) shall be paid to State Street (as compensation for its services under this Agreement) in the proportion set forth on Schedule A under the heading Fee Split. In the event that for a given monthly period, the sum of Net Investment Income and Fee Income is less than the amount of the rebate fees payable to Borrowers pursuant to the applicable Securities Loan Agreements, State Street and the relevant Fund shall be responsible for the shortfall in the proportions set forth on Schedule A under the heading Fee Split. The relevant Fund shall be solely responsible for any and all other amounts due to Borrowers under the applicable Securities Loan Agreements. For the avoidance of doubt, any taxes required to be withheld at source from Fee Income shall be deducted from the amount credited to the Funds relevant account as described in this Paragraph (c) (i.e., from the amount credited after payment of the amounts identified in clauses (i) and (ii) above), and to the extent that such amount is less than the amount of such taxes, then the Fund shall be responsible for any shortfall. Any amounts owed or liabilities or deficiencies incurred by a Fund hereunder may be satisfied solely from the assets of such Fund.
(d) Loan Premiums. To the extent that a Loan is secured by non-cash Collateral, the Borrower shall be required to pay a loan premium, the amount of which shall be negotiated by State Street. There may be instances in which the loan premium is zero on any particular day.
(e) Advances. State Street may, but is not obligated to, advance funds required to be paid by the Fund pursuant to a Securities Loan Agreement or this Agreement. State Street may, in its discretion, and in such case the Fund hereby explicitly authorizes State Street to, charge interest on any such advance at a rate consistent with prevailing rates for short-term investments at such time. The Fund shall reimburse State Street on demand for the amount of any such advance, including interest accrued and payable thereon up until the date of such payment, or any other amount owed by the Fund to State Street under this Agreement.
(f) Right to Debit or Set Off. State Street may at any time charge or debit any account of the Fund maintained by or on behalf of State Street in any capacity (or set off any amounts otherwise payable or creditable to any such account), and may sell or otherwise liquidate investments made with cash Collateral, to pay any amounts due to a Borrower under a Securities Loan Agreement or any Obligations of such Fund. If State Street charges or debits an account of a Fund (or exercises setoff rights) as described in the prior sentence and such charge, debit or setoff is not with respect to the relevant collateral account, State Street will make reasonable
8
efforts to notify the Fund of such action after such charge, debit or setoff. The Fund acknowledges that whenever State Street exercises its rights under this Paragraph (f) with respect to Obligations of the Fund, State Street is acting in a principal capacity on its own behalf and not on behalf of the Fund.
(g) Security Interest. As security for the payment and performance by the Fund of its Obligations, the Fund hereby grants to State Street a continuing lien upon and a first priority security interest in, all Collateral and all assets (including accounts and investments) and any proceeds thereof in which the Fund at any time has rights and which at any time is maintained with, or possessed or controlled in any capacity by, State Street or any person acting on behalf of State Street (collectively, the Property). If the Fund shall fail to pay or perform any or all of the Obligations of the Fund as and when due, State Street shall have all the rights and remedies of a secured party under the Uniform Commercial Code of Massachusetts and other applicable law with respect to the Property. While any Obligations of the Fund are outstanding, State Street may decline to deliver out Property if the Fund has failed to pay or perform any of the Obligations as and when due or to the extent that, in State Streets reasonable judgment, the aggregate value of the Property with respect to which State Street has a perfected security interest would be less than 105% of the Obligations of the Fund after giving effect to the delivery out. The provisions of this Section 9(g) shall not operate to limit any of State Streets rights under contract or applicable law.
10. Fee Disclosure. The fees associated with the investment of cash Collateral in collective investment vehicles maintained or advised by State Street are set forth in the disclosure materials relating to each applicable collective investment vehicle (e.g., prospectus or offering memorandum). An annual report with respect to such collective investment vehicles is available to the Funds, at no expense, upon request. These fees and expenses may be changed from time to time by State Street upon prior written notice to the Funds.
11. Recordkeeping, Reports and Audits. State Street will establish and maintain such records as are reasonably necessary to account for Loans that are made and the income derived therefrom (and to comply with all regulatory requirements applicable to State Street). State Streets records shall be presumed to reflect accurately any instructions, directions or other communications, regardless of how communicated, sent or delivered, from any Authorized Representative; provided, that such presumption may be rebutted by a Fund upon the presentation of written evidence to the contrary. On a monthly basis (or upon request of a Fund), State Street will provide the Funds with a statement describing the Loans made, and the income derived from Loans, during the period covered by such statement. Each party to this Agreement shall comply with the reasonable requests of the other for information necessary to the requesters performance of its duties in connection with this securities lending program, or compliance with applicable law, including, without limitation, requests by a Funds outside auditors for review of books and records of the Fund in connection with this securities lending program.
Each Fund hereby agrees to participate in data aggregation services which provide securities lending market analysis, provided however, that State Street is only authorized to provide information relating to the Funds lending program, including, Available Securities and
9
Loaned Securities, on an anonymous basis for aggregation into the database, the identity of the Fund as owner of the securities is in no way identifiable and the aggregator agrees to treat all information provided to it confidentially and to use such information solely for the purposes of providing the data aggregation service. If the Fund elects not to continue to participate in any such service at any time, State Street shall cease providing the Funds information within five (5) business days of written notification to that effect from the Fund.
Upon request of a Fund (which shall include reasonable advance notice), State Street shall grant reasonable access, during normal business hours, to the Funds personnel, agents or auditors (with such personnel, agents and auditors all being subject to compliance with State Streets confidentiality and security policies and procedures), to State Streets facilities and personnel to the extent such are used in connection with State Streets securities lending program, for the purpose of (i) conducting a due diligence review of State Streets technology systems used for agency securities lending; (ii) performing an audit in accordance with the business continuity program of the Funds or its Investment Manager; or (iii) for purposes of complying with regulatory requirements applicable to the Fund. Notwithstanding the foregoing statement, State Street reserves the right to impose reasonable limitations on the number, frequency, timing and scope of audits and inspections requested by the Fund or its auditor so as to prevent or minimize any potential impairment or disruption of its operations, distraction of its personnel or breaches of security, policies, confidentiality or regulatory limitations or requirements.
State Street will provide the Funds, during the term of this Agreement and upon request, a Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) 16 report twice a year, or at such other frequency as such SSAE 16 report is prepared by State Street with respect to its securities lending program each year. State Street shall notify the Funds of any such change in frequency.
12. Standard of Care and Indemnification.
(a) State Street shall use reasonable care in the performance of its duties hereunder consistent with that exercised by banks generally in the performance of duties arising from acting as agent for clients in securities lending and repurchase transactions (as appropriate), subject to the provisions of this Agreement.
(b) Each Fund shall indemnify State Street and hold State Street harmless from any loss or liability (including the reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel) incurred by State Street in rendering services hereunder or in connection with any breach of the terms of this Agreement by the Fund, except such loss or liability which results from State Streets failure to exercise the standard of care required by this Section 12 or from State Streets negligence, fraud or willful misconduct. Nothing in this Section shall derogate from the indemnities provided by State Street in Section 14.
(c) Notwithstanding any express provision to the contrary herein, none of the parties hereto shall be liable for any indirect, consequential, incidental, special or exemplary damages, even if it has been apprised of the likelihood of such damages occurring.
10
(d) Each Fund acknowledges that in the event that the Funds participation in securities lending generates income for the Fund, State Street may be required to withhold tax or may claim such tax from the Fund as is appropriate in accordance with applicable law.
(e) State Street, in determining the Market Value of Securities, including Collateral, may rely upon any recognized pricing services selected by State Street on a reasonable basis and shall not be liable for any errors made by such service.
13. Representations and Warranties. Each party hereto represents and warrants that (a) it has and will have the legal right, power and authority to execute and deliver this Agreement, to enter into the transactions contemplated hereby, and to perform its obligations hereunder; (b) it has taken all necessary action to authorize such execution, delivery, and performance; (c) this Agreement constitutes a legal, valid, and binding obligation enforceable against it; and (d) the execution, delivery, and performance by it of this Agreement will at all times comply with all applicable laws and regulations.
Each Fund represents and warrants that (a) it has made its own determination as to the tax and accounting treatment of any dividends, remuneration or other funds received hereunder; and (b) it is the legal and beneficial owner of (or exercises complete investment discretion over) all Available Securities free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and encumbrances and no such security has been sold, and that it is entitled to receive all distributions made by the issuer with respect to Loaned Securities.
Each Fund further represents and warrants that it will promptly notify State Street, by written notice, of the relevant details of any corporate actions, private consent offers/agreements and/or any other off-market arrangements that may require the recall and/or restriction of a security from lending activity. Such written notice shall be delivered sufficiently in advance so as to: (a) provide State Street with reasonable time to notify Borrowers of any instructions necessary to comply with the terms of the corporate actions, private consent offers/agreements and/or other off-market arrangements, and (b) provide such Borrowers with reasonable time to comply with such instructions.
The person executing this Agreement on behalf of the Funds and State Street represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Funds and State Street, respectively.
Each Fund represents and warrants that it is (i) a qualified investor within the meaning of Section 3(a)(54)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; or (ii) an employee benefit plan that owns and invests on a discretionary basis not less than US $25,000,000 in investments. Each Fund agrees to notify State Street immediately of any changes in the information set forth in this subparagraph of this Section 13.
Each Fund hereby represents to State Street that: (i) its policies and objectives generally permit it to engage in securities lending transactions; (ii) its policies permit it to purchase shares of the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Trust with cash Collateral; (iii) its participation
11
in State Streets securities lending program, including the investment of cash Collateral in the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Trust, and the existing series thereof has been approved by a majority of the directors or trustees which directors and trustees are not interested persons within the meaning of section 2(a)(19) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, and such directors or trustees will evaluate the securities lending program no less frequently than annually to determine that the investment of cash Collateral in the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Trust, including any series thereof, is in the Funds best interest; and (iv) its prospectus or statement of additional information, as applicable, provides appropriate disclosure concerning its securities lending activity.
Each Fund hereby represents to State Street that (i) it is not subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA) with respect to this Agreement and the Available Securities; (ii) it qualifies as an accredited investor within the meaning of Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended; (iii) that its taxpayer identification number and tax year end are as set forth in Schedule C hereto.
Each Fund represents and warrants on a continuing basis that it has determined that each investment vehicle set forth on Schedule B hereto, taking into account any fees assessed thereby, is now, and will continue to be, an acceptable and appropriate investment vehicle for the investment of the Funds cash Collateral under this Agreement. Each Fund further represents and warrants that it has received and reviewed the State Street Agency Securities Lending Program Description of Risks and Conflicts of Interest and, with respect to each investment vehicle set forth on Schedule B hereto, it has received and reviewed, as of the date of this Agreement, the disclosure memorandum, confidential offering memorandum or equivalent offering document of each such investment vehicle.
State Street represents and warrants to the Funds that (i) it is duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; and (ii) in the event that it is notified in writing by the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission that Investment Company Act Release No. 23441 (September 22, 1998) has been revoked, it will notify the Funds of such revocation as soon as reasonably practicable.
14. Borrower Default Indemnification.
(a) If at the time of a default (within the meaning of the applicable Securities Loan Agreement) by a Borrower with respect to a Loan, some or all of the Loaned Securities under such Loan have not been returned by the Borrower, and subject to the terms of this Agreement, State Street shall indemnify the Fund against the failure of the Borrower as follows. State Street shall purchase a number of Replacement Securities equal to the number of such unreturned Loaned Securities, to the extent that such Replacement Securities are available on the open market. Such Replacement Securities shall be purchased by applying the proceeds of the Collateral with respect to such Loan to the purchase of such Replacement Securities. Subject to the Funds obligations pursuant to Section 9 hereof, if and to the extent that such proceeds are insufficient or the Collateral is unavailable, the purchase of such Replacement Securities shall be made at State Streets expense.
12
(b) If State Street is unable to purchase Replacement Securities pursuant to Paragraph (a) hereof, State Street shall credit to the Funds relevant account an amount equal to the Market Value of the unreturned Loaned Securities for which Replacement Securities are not so purchased, determined as of (i) the last day the Collateral continues to be successfully marked to market against the unreturned Loaned Securities; or (ii) the next business day following the day referred to in (i) above, if higher.
(c) In addition to making the purchases or credits required by Paragraphs (a) and (b) hereof, State Street shall credit to the Funds relevant account the value of all distributions on the Loaned Securities (not otherwise credited to the Funds accounts with State Street), the record dates for which occur before the date that State Street purchases Replacement Securities pursuant to Paragraph (a) or credits the Funds relevant account pursuant to Paragraph (b).
(d) Any credits required under Paragraphs (b) and (c) hereof shall be made by application of the proceeds of the Collateral (if any) that remain after the purchase of Replacement Securities pursuant to Paragraph (a). If and to the extent that the Collateral is unavailable or the value of the proceeds of the remaining Collateral is less than the value of the sum of the credits required to be made under Paragraphs (b) and (c), such credits shall be made at State Streets expense.
(e) If after application of Paragraphs (a) through (d) hereof, additional Collateral remains or any previously unavailable Collateral becomes available or any additional amounts owed by the Borrower with respect to such Loan are received from the Borrower, State Street shall apply the proceeds of such Collateral or such additional amounts first to reimburse itself for any amounts expended by State Street pursuant to Paragraphs (a) through (d) above, and then to credit to the Funds relevant account all other amounts owed by the Borrower to the Fund with respect to such Loan under the applicable Securities Loan Agreement. State Street shall promptly notify the Fund of such reimbursements.
(f) In the event that State Street is required to make any payment and/or incur any loss or expense under this Section, State Street shall, to the extent of such payment, loss, or expense, be subrogated to, and succeed to, all of the rights of the Fund against the Borrower under the applicable Securities Loan Agreement. The Fund will, at the request of State Street, execute and deliver to State Street any confirmatory assignment or other instrument that State Street determines to be necessary or advisable to enable State Street to enforce any right to which State Street is subrogated.
15. Continuing Agreement; Termination; Remedies.
It is the intention of the parties hereto that this Agreement shall constitute a continuing agreement in every respect and shall apply to each and every Loan, whether now existing or hereafter made. The Funds and State Street may each at any time terminate this Agreement upon five (5) business days written notice to the other to that effect. The only effects of any such termination of this Agreement will be that (a) following such termination, no further Loans shall be made hereunder by State Street on behalf of the Funds, and (b) State Street shall, within a
13
reasonable time after termination of this Agreement, terminate any and all outstanding Loans. The provisions hereof shall continue in full force and effect in all other respects until all Loans have been terminated and all obligations satisfied as herein provided. State Street does not assume any market or investment risk of loss associated with the Funds change in cash Collateral investment vehicles or termination of, or change in, its participation in this securities lending program and the corresponding liquidation of cash Collateral investments.
16. Notices. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, notices under this Agreement shall be in writing. A notice shall be sufficient if sent to the party entitled to receive such notice by email, facsimile transmission, or prepaid overnight delivery service, or for termination of this Agreement only, by certified or registered mail, and addressed as shown below. Facsimile and email notices shall be sufficient only if receipt is acknowledged by the party to which such notice is communicated at the numbers and email addresses shown below.
If to the Funds:
Nuveen Funds
c/o Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
Attn: Securities Lending Committee
Email: DL_SecuritiesLending@tiaa.org
With a copy to:
Nuveen Funds
c/o Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
Attn: Nuveen Legal
If to State Street:
State Street Bank and Trust Company
Securities Finance
State Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02111-2900
Attn: Legal Department, 8th Floor
Fax: (617) 946-0046
SFLegal@StateStreet.com
or to such other addresses as either party may furnish the other party by written notice underthis section.
14
17. Securities Investors Protection Act of 1970 Notice. EACH FUND IS HEREBY ADVISED AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE PROVISIONS OF THE SECURITIES INVESTOR PROTECTION ACT OF 1970 MAY NOT PROTECT THE FUND WITH RESPECT TO THE LOAN OF SECURITIES HEREUNDER AND THAT, THEREFORE, THE COLLATERAL DELIVERED TO THE FUND MAY CONSTITUTE THE ONLY SOURCE OF SATISFACTION OF THE BROKERS OR DEALERS OBLIGATION IN THE EVENT THE BROKER OR DEALER FAILS TO RETURN THE SECURITIES.
18. Authorized Representatives. Each Fund authorizes State Street to accept and to act on any instructions or other communications, regardless of how sent or delivered, from any Authorized Representative. Each Fund shall be fully responsible for all acts of any Authorized Representative, even if that person exceeds his or her authority, and in no event shall State Street be liable to the Fund or any other third party for any losses or damages arising out of or relating to any act State Street takes or fails to take in connection with any such instructions or other communications.
19. Agents. State Street may use such agents, including such regulated clearing agents, securities depositaries, nominees, sub-custodians, third party custodians and State Street Affiliates, as State Street deems appropriate to carry out its duties under this Agreement; provided, however, that State Street is only authorized to utilize agents that are customarily retained by securities lending agents of a similar stature as State Street. To the extent State Street Affiliates act as State Streets agent hereunder, State Street agrees to be responsible for the acts and omissions of such State Street Affiliates as though performed by State Street directly. Each Fund agrees that State Streets sole liability for the acts or omissions of any other agent shall be limited to liability arising from State Streets failure to use reasonable care in the selection of such agent.
20. Force Majeure. State Street shall not be responsible for any losses, costs or damages suffered by the Funds resulting directly or indirectly from war, riot, revolution, terrorism, acts of government or other causes beyond the reasonable control or apprehension of State Street.
21. Miscellaneous. This Agreement supersedes any other agreement between the parties or any representations made by one party to the other, whether oral or in writing, concerning Loans of Available Securities by State Street on behalf of the Funds. This Agreement shall not be assigned by either State Street or the Funds without the prior written consent of the other party. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, representatives, successors, and assigns. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts. State Street and each Fund hereby irrevocably submit to the jurisdiction of any Massachusetts state or Federal court sitting in The Commonwealth of Massachusetts in any action or proceeding arising out of or related to this Agreement and hereby irrevocably agrees that all claims in respect of such action or proceeding may be heard and determined in such Massachusetts state or Federal court except that this provision shall not preclude any party from removing any action to Federal court. State Street and each Fund hereby irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent it may effectively do so, the defense of an inconvenient forum to the maintenance of such action or proceeding. State Street and each Fund
15
hereby irrevocably consents to the service of any and all process in any such action or proceeding by the mailing of copies of such process to the other party at its address specified in Section 16 hereof. State Street and each Fund agrees that a final judgment in any such action or proceeding, all appeals having been taken or the time period for such appeals having expired, shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. The provisions of this Agreement are severable and the invalidity or unenforceability of any provision hereof shall not affect any other provision of this Agreement. If in the construction of this Agreement any court should deem any provision to be invalid because of scope or duration, then such court shall forthwith reduce such scope or duration to that which is appropriate and enforce this Agreement in its modified scope or duration. In interpreting this Agreement the term including shall be read to mean including, but not limited to,.
22. Confidentiality. All information provided under this Agreement by a party (the Disclosing Party) to the other party (the Receiving Party) regarding the business and operations of the Disclosing Party shall be treated as confidential. All confidential information provided under this Agreement by Disclosing Party shall be used, including disclosure to third parties, by the Receiving Party, its affiliates and its agents or service providers, solely for the purpose of performing or receiving the services and discharging the Receiving Partys other obligations under the Agreement or managing the business of the Receiving Party and its affiliates, including financial and operational management and reporting, risk management, legal and regulatory compliance and client service management. Notwithstanding the forgoing, such information shall not be deemed confidential (a) if it is publicly available when provided or thereafter becomes publicly available, other than through a breach of this Agreement, (b) if it is independently derived by the Receiving Party without the use of any information provided by the Disclosing Party in connection with this Agreement, (c) if it is disclosed to comply with any legal or regulatory proceeding, investigation, audit, examination, subpoena, civil investigative demand or other similar process, (d) if it is disclosed as required by operation of law or regulation or as required to comply with the requirements of any market infrastructure that the Disclosing Party or its agents direct State Street or State Street Affiliates to employ or which is required in connection with the holding or settlement of instruments included in the assets subject to this Agreement, or (e) where the party seeking to disclose has received the prior written consent of the party providing the information, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.
23. Opt-In to U.S. Special Resolution Regimes.
(a) As used in this Section:
Affiliate has the meaning given in section 2(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1841(k)) and section 225.2(a) of the Boards Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.2(a)).
Default Right means any:
(i) Right of a party, whether contractual or otherwise (including, without limitation, rights incorporated by reference to any other contract, agreement, or document, and rights afforded by statute, civil code, regulation, and common law), to liquidate,
16
terminate, cancel, rescind, or accelerate such agreement or transactions thereunder, set off or net amounts owing in respect thereto (except rights related to same-day payment netting), exercise remedies in respect of collateral or other credit support or property related thereto (including the purchase and sale of property), demand payment or delivery thereunder or in respect thereof (other than a right or operation of a contractual provision arising solely from a change in the value of collateral or margin or a change in the amount of an economic exposure), suspend, delay, or defer payment or performance thereunder, or modify the obligations of a party thereunder, or any similar rights; and
(ii) Right or contractual provision that alters the amount of collateral or margin that must be provided with respect to an exposure thereunder, including by altering any initial amount, threshold amount, variation margin, minimum transfer amount, the margin value of collateral, or any similar amount, that entitles a party to demand the return of any collateral or margin transferred by it to the other party or a custodian or that modifies a transferees right to reuse collateral or margin (if such right previously existed), or any similar rights, in each case, other than a right or operation of a contractual provision arising solely from a change in the value of collateral or margin or a change in the amount of an economic exposure.
U.S. Special Resolution Regime means the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 18111835a) and regulations promulgated thereunder and Title II of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 53815394) and regulations promulgated thereunder.
(b) In the event State Street Bank and Trust Company becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. Special Resolution Regime, the transfer of this Agreement (and any interest and obligation in or under, and any property securing, this Agreement) from State Street Bank and Trust Company will be effective to the same extent as the transfer would be effective under the U.S. Special Resolution Regime if this Agreement (and any interest and obligation in or under, and any property securing, this Agreement) were governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States; and
(c) In the event State Street Bank and Trust Company or an Affiliate of State Street Bank and Trust Company becomes subject to a proceeding under a U.S. Special Resolution Regime, Default Rights with respect to this Agreement that may be exercised against State Street Bank and Trust Company are permitted to be exercised to no greater extent than the Default Rights could be exercised under the U.S. Special Resolution Regime if this Agreement were governed by the laws of the United States or a state of the United States.
24. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but such counterparts shall, together, constitute only one (1) instrument.
17
25. Amendments.
(a) Amendments to Agreement. This Agreement and the Schedules attached hereto shall not be modified or amended except by an instrument in writing signed by all of the parties hereto.
(b) Amendments to Schedule D. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Fund may unilaterally amend Schedule D hereto to remove a Borrower or add a Borrower from State Streets list of approved Borrowers; provided, that, State Street confirms such amendment by email, and is given a reasonable time to implement such changes.
26. Separate Agreements. It is understood and agreed that this document shall constitute a separate agreement with respect to each party listed on Schedule C attached hereto, as if each such party had executed a separate document naming only itself as Fund, and that no party listed on Schedule C shall have any liability under this document for the obligations of any other party so listed, and that, with respect to transactions entered into by any such party, State Street shall not in any event have recourse to the assets of any other party (including without limitation collateral or margin provided by such other party). With respect to any one such party, only confirmations and transactions between such Fund and State Street shall be part of the Agreement with such Fund.
27. Business Continuity. State Street shall maintain throughout the term of this Agreement business continuity, disaster recovery, and backup capabilities (the Plan(s)) that permit State Street to perform its obligations hereunder with minimal disruptions or delays. The Plans shall provide for the recovery from disruptions to suppliers, sites, technology and staff, including pandemic planning or other impacts that could result in mass protracted absenteeism. State Street shall also maintain recovery time objectives (RTOs) for all business critical functions used to perform the services. State Streets current RTOs priority levels for critical functions, which are objectives, do not exceed seven (7) business days. RTOs are State Streets internal guidelines only and may be updated from time to time by State Street. Upon request, State Street will provide to the Funds updates, if any, on RTOs.
28. Information Security. State Street represents that it currently maintains and shall continue to maintain throughout the term of this Agreement physical, electronic and procedural safeguards as described in the State Street Client Information Security Addendum attached hereto as EXHIBIT B.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
18
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has caused their duly authorized officer(s) to execute this Agreement, effective as of the first date set forth above.
EACH TRUST | ||
acting on its own behalf or on behalf of each series, as applicable, as listed on Schedule C, severally and not jointly | ||
Name: /s/ E. Scott Wickerham | ||
By: E. Scott Wickerham | ||
Its: Vice President and Controller | ||
STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY | ||
Name:/s/ Francesco Squillacioti | ||
By: Francesco Squillacioti | ||
Its: Senior Managing Director |
SCHEDULE A
This Schedule is attached to and made part of the Securities Lending Authorization Agreement dated the 12th day of August 2020 between each NUVEEN registered investment company listed on Schedule C, severally and not jointly (the Funds) and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY acting either directly or through any State Street Affiliate (collectively, State Street).
Fee Split
92% to the Fund
8% to State Street
SCHEDULE B
This Schedule is attached to and made part of the Securities Lending Authorization Agreement dated the 12th day of August 2020 between each NUVEEN registered investment company listed on Schedule C, severally and not jointly (the Funds) and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY acting either directly or through any State Street Affiliate (collectively, State Street).
Cash Collateral Investment
The Funds instruct State Street to invest cash Collateral in the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio. Information about the various fees and expenses charged by the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio is disclosed in the confidential offering memorandum, shareholder reports and/or other portfolio documents. The State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio distributes yield daily. The daily yield will be reinvested into the vehicle until redeemed monthly to make the payments contemplated by this Agreement.
The investment manager of the collective investment vehicle specified above may, to the extent consistent with the relevant investment guidelines and/or other offering documents, invest cash Collateral (including any dividends, interest payments and other money received in respect of cash Collateral as invested) in funds or investments with respect to which State Street and/or State Street Affiliates provide investment management or advisory, trust, custody, transfer agency, shareholder servicing and/or other services for which they are compensated.
To the extent that there is a period of time when the cash Collateral cannot be promptly invested pursuant to the direction of the Funds as set forth above, whether due to the timing of delivery of the cash Collateral by Borrower, any delay between monthly redemptions from the vehicle above and monthly payments contemplated by this Agreement, or otherwise, such cash Collateral may be held in a demand deposit account or similar account in the name of State Street or any State Street Affiliate (which account may or may not bear interest).
SCHEDULE C
This Schedule is attached to and made part of the Securities Lending Authorization Agreement dated the 12th day of August 2020 between each NUVEEN registered investment company listed on Schedule C, severally and not jointly (the Funds) and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY acting either directly or through any State Street Affiliate (collectively, State Street).
List of Funds
Fund Name |
Tax ID | Tax Year End | ||||||
Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund |
20-4207406 | 2/28 | ||||||
Nuveen Core Impact Bond Managed Accounts Portfolio |
85-0626116 | 10/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Dividend Value Fund |
25-1692047 | 10/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Emerging Markets Equity Fund |
83-1838258 | 7/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Equity Long/Short Fund |
26-3587081 | 8/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Equity Market Neutral Fund |
46-2369493 | 8/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund |
61-1540686 | 12/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Global Real Estate Securities Fund |
82-3943430 | 12/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Credit Income Fund |
23-2958095 | 6/30 | ||||||
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond Fund |
36-4294442 | 3/31 | ||||||
Nuveen International Growth Fund |
26-4481991 | 7/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Large Cap Core Fund |
46-2319590 | 8/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Large Cap Growth Fund |
46-2307509 | 8/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Large Cap Select Fund |
45-0495825 | 10/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Large Cap Value Fund |
36-4091128 | 8/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Mid Cap Growth Opportunities Fund |
84-6214484 | 10/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund |
39-1603605 | 10/31 | ||||||
Nuveen NWQ Flexible Income Fund |
27-1290573 | 9/30 | ||||||
Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund |
27-0735548 | 6/30 | ||||||
Nuveen NWQ International Value Fund |
36-4327209 | 6/30 | ||||||
Nuveen NWQ Large-Cap Value Fund |
20-5685051 | 6/30 | ||||||
Nuveen NWQ Multi-Cap Value Fund |
23-3101390 | 6/30 | ||||||
Nuveen NWQ Small/Mid-Cap Value Fund |
20-5685200 | 6/30 | ||||||
Nuveen NWQ Small-Cap Value Fund |
20-1732434 | 6/30 | ||||||
Nuveen Preferred Securities and Income Fund |
20-5693704 | 9/30 | ||||||
Nuveen Real Asset Income Fund |
45-2725214 | 12/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Real Estate Securities Fund |
23-2802884 | 12/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Santa Barbara Dividend Growth Fund |
20-4207876 | 7/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Santa Barbara Global Dividend Growth Fund |
45-4993993 | 7/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Santa Barbara International Dividend Growth Fund |
45-4994049 | 7/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund |
46-1414110 | 3/31 | ||||||
Nuveen Small Cap Growth Opportunities Fund |
39-1829200 | 10/31 |
Nuveen Small Cap Select Fund |
39-1901483 | 10/31 | ||||
Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund |
23-2909969 | 10/31 | ||||
Nuveen Strategic Income Fund |
36-4333232 | 6/30 | ||||
Nuveen Symphony High Yield Income Fund |
26-0303143 | 9/30 | ||||
Nuveen Winslow International Large Cap Fund |
83-2180402 | 7/31 | ||||
Nuveen Winslow International Small Cap Fund |
81-4656371 | 7/31 | ||||
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund |
26-4668245 | 7/31 | ||||
Nuveen ETFs |
||||||
Nuveen Enhanced Yield 1-5 Year U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF |
81-5245953 | 7/31 | ||||
Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF |
81-3031250 | 7/31 | ||||
Nuveen ESG Emerging Markets Equity ETF |
81-5205513 | 10/31 | ||||
Nuveen ESG High Yield Corporate Bond ETF |
84-2460312 | 7/31 | ||||
Nuveen ESG International Developed Markets Equity ETF |
81-5198640 | 10/31 | ||||
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF |
83-4029106 | 10/31 | ||||
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Growth ETF |
81-4136820 | 10/31 | ||||
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF |
81-4158564 | 10/31 | ||||
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Growth ETF |
81-4172679 | 10/31 | ||||
Nuveen ESG Mid-Cap Value ETF |
81-4185583 | 10/31 | ||||
Nuveen ESG Small-Cap ETF |
81-4198293 | 10/31 | ||||
Nuveen ESG U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF |
82-2254672 | 7/31 | ||||
Nuveen Short-Term REIT ETF |
81-4210004 | 12/31 | ||||
Nuveen Closed-End Funds |
||||||
Nuveen Core Equity Alpha Fund |
20-8449001 | 12/31 | ||||
Nuveen Dow 30sm Dynamic Overwrite Fund |
47-1393396 | 12/31 | ||||
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund |
47-1402770 | 12/31 | ||||
Nuveen S&P 500 Buy-Write Income Fund |
20-1590560 | 12/31 | ||||
Nuveen S&P 500 Dynamic Overwrite Fund |
20-3622755 | 12/31 |
SCHEDULE D
This Schedule is attached to and made part of the Securities Lending Authorization Agreement dated the 12th day of August 2020 between each NUVEEN registered investment company listed on Schedule C, severally and not jointly (the Funds) and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY acting either directly or through any State Street Affiliate (collectively, State Street).
Schedule of Borrowers
U.S. |
||
ABN AMRO Securities (USA) LLC
Bank of Nova Scotia (New York Branch)
BMO Capital Markets Corp.
BNP Paribas Securities Corp
CIBC World Markets Corp.
Commerz Markets LLC
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
HSBC Securities (USA) Inc.
JP Morgan Securities LLC.
Mirae Asset Securities (USA) Inc.
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Natixis Securities Americas, LLC
Nomura Securities International Inc.
Scotia Capital (USA) Inc.
Societe Generale SA (NY Branch)
UBS Securities LLC
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC |
Bank of Nova Scotia (Houston Branch)
Barclays Capital Inc.
BNP Paribas (New York Branch)
BofA Securities, Inc.
Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC
ING Financial Markets LLC
MacQuarie Capital (USA) Inc.
Mizuho Securities USA LLC
National Financial Services LLC.
Natwest Market Securities Inc.
RBC Capital Markets, LLC
SG Americas Securities LLC
TD Securities (USA) LLC
Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC |
SCHEDULE E
This Schedule is attached to and made part of the Securities Lending Authorization Agreement dated the 12th day of August 2020 between each NUVEEN registered investment company listed on Schedule C, severally and not jointly (the Funds) and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY acting either directly or through any State Street Affiliate (collectively, State Street).
Lending Restrictions
1. |
At all times, at least 1% of each security holding of a Fund shall be designated as not being part of such Funds Available Securities. |
2. |
Minimum Spread Requirements. Pursuant to the terms of a letter of direction in the form of Attachment A hereto (each, a Letter of Direction), the Funds shall from time to time instruct State Street to implement a minimum spread at the initiation of each Loan. Each such Letter of Direction shall instruct State Street to implement a Minimum Total Spread, as defined below. |
Minimum Total Spread Test
At the initiation of each Loan collateralized with cash Collateral, the Total Spread must be equal to or greater than twenty-five (25) basis points (the Minimum Total Spread Test). For the avoidance of doubt, loans may have a Total Spread that is lower than twenty-five (25) basis points during the term of the loan so long as the loan satisfied the Minimum Total Spread Test at initiation. There will be no Minimum Total Spread Test applied to Loans collateralized with non-cash Collateral.
For purposes of the Minimum Total Spread Test:
Total Spread means, the difference between the yield of the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio as reported by the Fund on the preceding day (or if no yield was reported on the preceding day, the last day a yield was reported), and the rebate rate. The Funds are aware that because the Minimum Total Spread Test is based off of the yield of the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio on the preceding day there may be instances where there are more loans made or fewer loans made than would have otherwise been made in each case if the Minimum Total Spread Test was based off of the yield of the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio on the day the loan is actually made.
3. |
Except as approved in writing by a Fund in advance, the following lending limitations apply for the Funds as listed on Schedule C to the Agreement: |
a. |
State Street shall use reasonable efforts not enter into a Loan on behalf of a Fund if, immediately after such Loan transaction, the aggregate Market Value of all Loaned Securities of such Fund would exceed thirty-three and a third percent (33 1/3%) of |
the value of the relevant Funds net asset value of the Fund, as determined by the Funds accountant as of the end of the previous business day (Value of Net Assets) (the NAV Test). |
b. |
Each Fund shall cause the Value of Net Assets of such Fund to be delivered to the securities finance team at State Street at the end of each business day (it being understood that this will be delivered through a standing instruction given by the Fund to State Street or Third Party Custodian under its custodial arrangement or otherwise) (the End of Day Feed) and State Street shall use such End of Day Feed to implement the NAV Test during the following business day. If the NAV Test is not satisfied for a Fund due to a change in the Value of Net Assets of the Fund, State Street shall act reasonably promptly to terminate Loans sufficient to bring the applicable Funds securities lending program into compliance with the NAV Test. State Street shall not be liable for any consequences from the Funds failure to deliver the End of Day Feed (or to cause the End of Day Feed to be delivered) to the securities finance team timely and/or accurately. |
The terms of this Schedule E shall not be modified, except by an instrument in writing and signed by the parties hereto. All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]
Attachment A to Schedule E
[NUVEEN LETTERHEAD]
LETTER OF DIRECTION
, 20
State Street Bank and Trust Company
Securities Finance
State Street Financial Center, 3rd Floor
One Lincoln Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02111-2900
Attn: [Relationship Manager]
Re: Implementation of Minimum Spread
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:
[FUNDS] hereby instructs State Street to implement the Minimum Total Spread Test set forth below at the initiation of each Loan. The Funds hereby acknowledge that (i) such Minimum Total Spread Test shall not be implemented by State Street until this Letter of Direction is countersigned by State Street, and (ii) State Street shall have a reasonable time to implement the Minimum Total Spread Test after countersigning this Letter of Direction.
Minimum Total Spread Test
At the initiation of each Loan collateralized with cash Collateral, the Total Spread must be equal to or greater than ( ) basis points (the Minimum Total Spread Test). For the avoidance of doubt, loans may have a Total Spread that is lower than ( ) basis points during the term of the loan so long as the loan satisfied the Minimum Total Spread Test at initiation. There will be no Minimum Total Spread Test applied to Loans collateralized with non-cash Collateral.
For purposes of the Minimum Total Spread Test:
Total Spread means, the difference between the yield of the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio as reported by the Fund on the preceding day (or if no yield was reported on the preceding day, the last day a yield was reported), and the rebate rate. The Funds are aware that because the
Minimum Total Spread Test is based off of the yield of the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio on the preceding day there may be instances where there are more loans made or fewer loans made than would have otherwise been made in each case if the Minimum Total Spread Test was based off of the yield of the State Street Navigator Securities Lending Government Money Market Portfolio on the day the loan is actually made.
All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Securities Lending Authorization Agreement between the Funds and State Street dated , 20 .
Sincerely, |
||
Name: | [Name of Authorized Representative] | |
Title: | [Title of Authorized Representative] |
SCHEDULE F
This Schedule is attached to and made part of the Securities Lending Authorization Agreement dated the 12th day of August 2020 between each NUVEEN registered investment company listed on Schedule C, severally and not jointly (the Funds) and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY acting either directly or through any State Street Affiliate (collectively, State Street).
Schedule of Authorized Representatives
E. Scott Wickerham |
Vice President and Controller |
|
Walter Kelly |
Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President |
|
Christopher Rohrbacher |
Vice President, Secretary of Open-End Funds and ETFs and Assistant Secretary of Closed-End Funds |
|
Gifford Zimmerman |
Vice President, Secretary of Closed-End Funds and Assistant Secretary of Open-End Funds and ETFs |
|
Jon Scott Meissner |
Vice President and Assistant Secretary |
|
Mark Czarniecki |
Vice President of Open-End Funds and ETFs, Assistant Vice President of Closed-End Funds and Assistant Secretary |
|
Harvey Klemm |
Managing Director, Nuveen, LLC |
|
Tim Gehman |
Vice President, Nuveen, LLC |
|
Alecia Brown |
Assistant Vice President, Nuveen, LLC |
SCHEDULE G
This Schedule is attached to and made part of the Securities Lending Authorization Agreement dated the 12th day of August 2020 between each NUVEEN registered investment company listed on Schedule C, severally and not jointly (the Funds) and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY acting either directly or through any State Street Affiliate (collectively, State Street).
Schedule of Authorized State Street Representatives
[State Street Logo]
State Street Bank and Trust Company
SSGM SF Boston Agency Operation Authorized Signature List
/s/ David J. Franzosa |
/s/ Joseph A. Leone |
|||
David J. Franzosa, Managing Director |
Joseph A. Leone, Vice President |
|||
/s/ Melody (Hiu Hung) Yeung |
/s/ Aaron Lewis |
|||
Melody (Hiu Hung) Yeung, Vice President |
Aaron Lewis, Vice President |
|||
/s/ Paul J. Welch |
/s/ John Lawrence |
|||
Paul J. Welch, Vice President |
John Lawrence, Officer |
|||
/s/ Jennifer E. Pangburn |
/s/ Jeffrey LeBretton |
|||
Jennifer E. Pangburn, Vice President |
Jeffrey LeBretton, Assistant Vice President |
|||
/s/ Christopher Camerota |
/s/ Wanna Wong |
|||
Christopher Camerota, Assistant Vice President |
Wanna Wong, Assistant Vice President |
|||
/s/ Jared White |
/s/ Christine DiSanto |
|||
Jared White, Officer |
Christine DiSanto, Assistant Vice President |
|||
/s/ Vinilda Pena |
/s/ Jeffrey Vermillion |
|||
Vinilda Pena, Assistant Vice President |
Jeffrey Vermillion, Assistant Vice President |
|||
/s/ Lindsey Mccormick |
/s/ Igli Pina |
|||
Lindsey Mccormick, Officer |
Igli Pina, Officer |
|||
/s/ Ryan Hogan |
/s/ Nick Potter |
|||
Ryan Hogan, Officer |
Nick Potter, Officer |
|||
/s/ Charlene Situ |
||||
Charlene Situ, Officer |
[State Street Logo]
State Street Corporate Services (Mumbai) Pvt Ltd
Securities Finance Operations, India
Authorized Signature List May 2020
/s/ Wendy Wilde |
/s/ Srinivas Samadal |
|
Wendy Wilde, Managing Director |
Srinivas Samadal, Vice President |
|
WWilde@statestreet.com |
SSamadal@statestreet.com |
|
+918061631975 |
+914067092730 |
|
/s/ Rahiman Mazhar |
/s/ Tarigoppula2, Kishore |
|
Rahiman Mazhar, Officer |
Tarigoppula2 Kishore, Assistant Vice President |
|
MRahiman@statestreet.com |
KTarigoppula2@statestreet.com |
|
+918061631894 |
+ 914067091015 |
|
/s/ Anish Phatarpekar |
/s/ Sarwar Ali |
|
Anish Phatarpekar, Assistant Vice President |
Sarwar Ali, Senior Associate |
|
APhatarpekar@statestreet.com |
SAli8@statestreet.com |
|
+ 918061631976 |
+ 918067456184 |
|
/s/ Somasekhar,Chinnaiah |
/s/ Soumandeep Khan |
|
Somasekhar,Chinnaiah Officer |
Soumandeep Khan, Senior Associate |
|
SChinnaiah@statestreet.com |
SKhan5@statestreet.com |
|
+ 918061631986 |
+ 918067456181 |
/s/ Balakrishna Ravulkol |
/s/ Sandeep Biradar |
|
Balakrishna Ravulkol, Senior Associate |
Sandeep Biradar, Officer |
|
BRavulkol@statestreet.com |
SBiradar4@statestreet.com |
|
+ 914067090660 |
+914067090625 |
|
/s/ Kotha Seshu |
/s/ Geedipalli Vijender Redd |
|
Kotha, Seshu Officer |
Geedipalli, Vijender Redd - Senior Associate |
|
SKotha@statestreet.com |
VGeedipalli@statestreet.com |
|
+914067091193 |
+914067092690 |
|
/s/ Bhalerao Abhilesh Nahar |
/s/ Mandala Satish |
|
Bhalerao, Abhilesh Nahar - Senior Associate |
Mandala, Satish - Senior Associate |
|
ABhalerao3@statestreet.com |
SMandala1@statestreet.com |
|
+914067092689 |
+ 914067090765 |
|
/s/ Motupally Naga Satish |
/s/ C Pushpa |
|
Motupally, Naga Satish - Senior Associate |
C, Pushpa - Senior Associate |
|
NMotupally@statestreet.com |
PC2@statestreet.com |
|
+ 918067092116 |
+918061631988 |
|
/s/ Nair Sreenath S |
/s/ Rao, Srinivasa |
|
Nair, Sreenath S - Senior Associate |
Rao, Srinivasa - Senior Associate |
|
SNair19@statestreet.com |
SRao6@statestreet.com |
|
+918061636000 |
+918061631984 |
|
/s/ George Michael |
/s/ Nair, Sajay Raveendran |
|
George, Michael - Senior Associate |
Nair, Sajay Raveendran - Senior Associate |
|
MGeorge2@statestreet.com |
SNair16@statestreet.com |
|
+ 918061631983 |
+ 91806120400 |
SCHEDULE H
This Schedule is attached to and made part of the Securities Lending Authorization Agreement dated the 12th day of August 2020 between each NUVEEN registered investment company listed on Schedule C, severally and not jointly (the Funds) and STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY acting either directly or through any State Street Affiliate (collectively, State Street).
Acceptable Form of Collateral
- Cash (in U.S. Dollars)
EXHIBIT A
SPECIAL RESOLUTION REGIMES
Following the financial crisis, many jurisdictions are implementing or have implemented special resolution regime laws and regulations that are intended to ensure that financial institutions are able to be resolved in an orderly manner if they become, or are perceived likely to become, insolvent (each, a Special Resolution Regime). These Special Resolution Regimes are intended to address the failure or potential failure of a financial institution without causing a significant impact on the broader financial markets.
These Special Resolution Regimes will differ from country to country, but in general covered financial institutions1 must ensure that all of their covered agreements (which include, without limitation, trading agreements governing foreign exchange, securities lending, and repurchase transactions, as well as triparty collateral agreements) comply with relevant rules (often, but not always, by the inclusion of express contractual terms2) limiting the ability of the trading counterparties of the covered financial institution to exercise certain rights, including, without limitation, the ability to:
|
exercise default rights under the covered agreement and any related guarantees or other credit enhancements, except to the extent otherwise permitted under the relevant Special Resolution Regime, |
|
exercise cross-defaults and similar default rights, except to the extent otherwise permitted under the relevant Special Resolution Regime, |
|
object to transfers of the covered agreement and related credit enhancements to third parties and bridge entities, to the same extent the trading counterparty would be prohibited from objecting to such transfers if it were directly subject to the Special Resolution Regime applicable to the covered financial institution, and |
|
object to the exercise by the relevant authority of its bail-in power with respect to the obligations of the covered financial institution under the covered agreement, to the extent permitted under the Special Resolution Regime. The bail-in concept is the process by which claims against a covered financial institution may be reduced materially in nominal amount (potentially to zero) and/or be converted into, for example, shares (of potentially a reduced nominal amount). |
These Special Resolution Regime rules are currently in effect with respect to covered financial institutions established in several jurisdictions globally. The covered financial institutions under the Special Resolution Regime of the United States will be required to comply with these rules in a phased approach, but with limited exception must be in compliance with respect to all of
1 Specifically, those financial institutions domiciled within the relevant jurisdiction as well as, in certain cases, their affiliates.
2 For example, it should be noted that Special Resolution Regimes may apply automatically by force of law, without the need for express contractual amendment in some cases, depending on matters such as the governing law of the contract.
their trading counterparties no later than July 1, 2019. Other jurisdictions are expected to adopt similar requirements.
When asked to do so by a covered financial institution, State Street will agree to amend existing covered agreements that we execute as agent on your behalf, or enter into new covered agreements as agent on your behalf, to the extent necessary to satisfy the requirements of any existing or future Special Resolution Regime applicable to that covered financial institution. We will in our discretion include the contractual terms in covered agreements through a bilateral agreement as described above or by adhering to industry standard protocols, including those adopted by International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) or other similar organizations.
If at any time you wish to instruct us to:
(i) no longer execute transactions on your behalf with a particular covered financial institution, or
(ii) no longer execute transactions on your behalf with any and all covered financial institutions within a particular jurisdiction subject to a Special Resolution Regime, or
(iii) not enter into an industry standard protocol with respect to any existing or future Special Resolution Regime,
you must send an email to SSGM_Resolution_Stay_Rules@statestreet.com identifying the covered financial institutions or jurisdictions as to which you do not wish to be bound by a Special Resolution Regime, or the protocol to which you do not wish to adhere. If you elect (i) or (ii) above, we will no longer execute transactions on your behalf with any covered financial institution you specify or any covered financial institution subject to the Special Resolution Regime of the jurisdictions you specify, and the relevant covered financial institutions will be removed from your approved panel of authorized financial institution counterparties under your authorization agreement. If with respect to (iii) you instruct us not to enter into an industry standard protocol with respect to any existing or future Special Resolution Regime and the relevant covered financial institutions subject to that Special Resolution Regime are unwilling to amend the contract bilaterally, we will no longer execute transactions on your behalf with any covered financial institution subject to such Special Resolution Regime, and the relevant covered financial institutions will be removed from your approved panel of authorized financial institution counterparties under your authorization agreement.
Please note that State Street Bank and Trust Company adhered as agent to the ISDA 2018 U.S. Resolution Stay Protocol on June 20, 2019.
With respect to the Swiss special resolution stay regulations, State Street Bank and Trust Company as agent has entered into an Acknowledgment of the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authoritys Right to Stay Termination of Agreements with UBS AG.
The Special Resolution Regimes and any related protocols vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. You should refer to your own legal advisors for advice with respect to your determinations regarding the Special Resolution Regimes and any related protocols, as State Street is not acting as your legal advisor or fiduciary as to such determinations.
EXHIBIT B
State Street Client Information Security Addendum
All capitalized terms not defined in this State Street Client Information Security Addendum (this Security Addendum) shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.
State Street and the Funds hereby agree that State Street shall maintain an information security policy (Security Policy) that satisfies the requirements set forth below; provided, that, because information security is a highly dynamic space (where laws, regulations and threats are constantly changing), State Street reserves the right to make changes to its information security controls at any time and at the sole discretion of State Street in a manner that it believes does not materially reduce the protection it applies to Funds Data. State Street will review the policy on an annual basis.
From time to time, State Street may subcontract services performed under the Agreement (to the extent provided for under the Agreement) or provide access to Funds Confidential Information (Funds Data) its network to a subcontractor or other third party; provided, that, such subcontractor or third party implements and maintains security measures that State Street believes are at least as stringent as those described in this Security Addendum. State Street must maintain an up-to-date list of subcontractors that access, store, transmit, or use Funds Data, and must provide the list to the Funds upon request.
For subcontractors who collect, transmit, share, store, control, process, manage or access Funds Data, State Street is responsible for assessing and monitoring subcontractor control environments.
1. |
Objective. |
The objective of State Streets Security Policy and related information security program is to implement data security measures consistent in all material respects with applicable prevailing industry practices and standards (Objective). State Street must define job responsibilities to ensure effective management of information security and appropriate separation of duties within the organization. State Street will use utilize qualified information security personnel sufficient to manage State Streets cybersecurity risks. In order to meet such Objective, State Street uses commercially reasonable efforts to:
a. Protect the privacy, confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all confidential data and information disclosed by or on behalf of the Funds to, or otherwise comes into the possession of State Street, in connection with the provision of services under the Agreement and to the extent the same is deemed Funds Data;
b. protect against accidental, unauthorized, unauthenticated or unlawful access, copying, use, processing, disclosure, alteration, transfer, loss or destruction of the Funds Data;
c. comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations that are relevant to the handling, processing and use of Funds Data by State Street in accordance with the Agreement;
d. implement customary administrative, physical, technical, procedural and organizational safeguards; and
e. limit the amount of Funds Data collected to that reasonably necessary to accomplish the services, limit the time such information is retained to that reasonably necessary to perform the services, and limit access to those persons who are reasonably required to access or handle the Funds Data in order to perform the services.
2. |
Risk Assessments. |
a. Risk Assessment - State Street shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Funds Data, the likelihood of those threats occurring and the impact of those threats upon the State Street organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (Risk Assessments).
b. Risk Mitigation - State Street shall use commercially reasonable efforts to manage, control and remediate any threats identified in the Risk Assessments that it believes are likely to result in material unauthorized access, copying, use, processing, disclosure, alteration, transfer, loss or destruction of Funds Data, consistent with the Objective, and commensurate with the sensitivity of the Funds Data and the complexity and scope of the activities of State Street pursuant to the Agreement.
c. Security Controls Testing - State Street shall, on approximately an annual basis, engage an independent external party to conduct periodic reviews of State Streets information security practices. State Street shall have a process to review and evaluate high risk findings resulting from this testing.
3. Security Controls. Prior to State Street having access to Funds Data, then annually and upon the Funds reasonable request, State Street shall provide the Funds Chief Information Security Officer or his or her designee with a copy of its corporate information security controls that form the basis for State Streets Security Policy and an opportunity to discuss State Streets information security measures with a qualified member of State Streets information technology management team.
4. |
Organizational Security. |
a. Responsibility - State Street shall assign responsibility for information security management to senior personnel only and will name a State Street employee to be responsible for leading this information security function.
b. Access - State Street shall permit only those personnel performing roles supporting the provision of services under the Agreement to access Funds Data.
c. Confidentiality - State Street personnel who have accessed or otherwise been made known of Funds Data shall maintain the confidentiality of such information in accordance with the terms of the Agreement.
d. Policy Exception - As part of the Security Policy State Street shall implement a process by which exceptions to the Security Policy are reviewed and processed. This exception process must be documented.
e. Training - State Street will provide information security training on approximately an annual basis, to its personnel.
5. |
Data Protection. |
a. Data Sensitivity - State Street acknowledges that it understands the sensitivity of Funds Data.
b. Data Flow - State Street must document data flows and associated protections for data which is sent or received between Funds systems and State Street systems.
c. External Hosting Facilities State Street shall implement controls, consistent with applicable prevailing industry practices and standards, regarding the collection, use, storage and/or disclosure of Funds Data by an external hosting provider.
d. Segregation of Funds Data - State Street shall use generally accepted security management controls designed to ensure that none of State Streets other clients have access to Funds Data.
6. |
Physical Security and Data Destruction. |
a. Securing Physical Facilities - State Street shall maintain systems located in State Street facilities that host Funds Data or provide services under the Agreement in an environment that is designed to be physically secure and to allow access only to authorized individuals. A secure environment includes the availability of onsite security personnel on a 24 x 7 basis or equivalent means of monitoring locations supporting the delivery of services under the Agreement.
b. Physical Security of Media - State Street shall implement controls, consistent with applicable prevailing industry practices and standards that are designed to deter the unauthorized viewing, copying, alteration or removal of any media containing Funds Data. Removable media on which Funds Data is stored (including thumb drives, CDs, and DVDs, and PDAS) by State Street must be encrypted using at least 256 bit AES (or equivalent).
c. Media Destruction State Street shall destroy removable media and any mobile device (such as discs, USB drives, DVDs, back-up tapes, laptops and PDAs) containing Funds Data or use commercially reasonable efforts to render Funds Data on such physical media unintelligible if such media or mobile device is no longer intended to be used. All backup tapes that are not destroyed must meet the level of protection described in this Security Addendum until destroyed. Electronic media that is not physically destroyed as part of the disposal process must be irrevocably erased or degaussed, such that the media is no longer readable for any purpose. State Street must develop and document information destruction processes that meet industry standards and must be used in all cases when Funds Data is no longer needed. State Street shall keep records of all Funds Data destruction completed and provide such records to the Funds upon demand or provide a certification that all such information has been destroyed in accordance with this Security Addendum.
d. Paper Destruction - State Street shall cross shred all paper waste containing Funds Data and dispose in a secure and confidential manner.
7. |
Communications and Operations Management. |
a. Firewall Management Firewall management processes must be documented and meet industry standards. Any files containing Funds Data on a system connected to the internet must be protected with up to date, industry standard, firewall protections and operating system security patches designed to maintain integrity and security of the Funds Data.
b. Network Access State Street must implement controls designed to prevent unauthorized devices from physically connecting to the internal network or to detect and alert an administrator (e.g. Network Access Control device (NAC)).
c. Monitoring Systems - State Street shall monitor its systems (i) security incidents; (ii) unauthorized use of or access to Funds Data; and (iii) violations and suspicious activity. This includes suspicious external activity (including unauthorized probes, scans or break-in attempts) and suspicious internal activity (including unauthorized system administrator access, unauthorized changes to its systems or network, system or network misuse or theft or mishandling of Funds Data). State Street shall maintain audit and logging capabilities that will enable the State Street to effectively detect, respond to and investigate a data security incident.
d. Intelligence Services - State Street shall monitor industry-standard information channels for newly identified system vulnerabilities and emerging risks regarding the technologies and services provided to the Funds.
e. Intrusion Detection and Prevention - State Street shall maintain software, hardware, intrusion detection system, personnel and other resources designed to ascertain whether a penetration attempt is being made against any part of State Streets network, mainframe, server or other infrastructure used by State Street to process, store or transport Funds Data. This may include deploying intrusion detection /intrusion prevention controls to block, monitor, and alert State Street of security incidents that may require escalation to, and response from, State Streets incident response personnel on a 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, 365 days per year basis.
f. Network Penetration Testing - State Street shall, on approximately an annual basis, contract with an independent third party to conduct network penetration test. State Street shall have a process to review and evaluate high risk findings resulting from this testing. The cost of vulnerability and penetration testing will be assumed by State Street.
g. Data Protection During Transmission - State Street shall encrypt, using an industry recognized encryption algorithm, personally identifiable Funds Data when in transit across public networks.
h. Data Loss Prevention - State Street shall implement a data loss prevention program that is designed to identify, detect, monitor and alert on abnormal external data movement.
i. Malicious Code State Street shall implement controls that are designed to detect the introduction or intrusion of malicious code on information systems handling or holding Funds Data and implement a process for removing said malicious code from information systems handling or holding Funds Data.
8. |
Access Controls. |
a. Authorized Access - State Street shall have controls that are designed to maintain the logical separation such that access to systems hosting Funds Data and/or being used
to provide services to the Funds will uniquely identify each individual requiring access, grant access only to authorized personnel based on the principle of least privileges, and prevent unauthorized access to Funds Data.
b. User Access - State Street shall have a process to promptly disable access to Funds Data by any State Street personnel who no longer requires such access, State Street will also promptly remove access of Funds personnel upon receipt of notification from the Funds.
c. Authentication Credential Management - State Street shall communicate authentication credentials to users in a secure manner, with a proof of identity check of the intended users. Initial password must be delivered in a secure manner and are required to be changed upon first logon.
d. Multi-Factor Authentication for Remote Access - State Street shall use multi factor authentication and a secure tunnel when remotely accessing State Streets internal network.
e. Access Recertification - State Street must document a process to regularly recertify access to those facilities, systems, networks and applications that store, use, or otherwise have access to Funds Data. This should include a documented review of access rights to confirm that access is still appropriate based on business needs. This review should occur at least annually or more frequently depending on risk and industry standards.
f. Unique IDs - State Street must assign unique user IDs that are reasonably designed to maintain the integrity of the security of the access control to each person with computer access.
g. Password Standards - State Street must document a password policy with a reasonably secure method of assigning and selecting passwords, or the use of unique identifier technologies, such as biometrics or token devices that cover all systems that store, access, transmit or process Funds Data. Where technically feasible, passwords cannot be vendor supplied default passwords. This policy shall define standards for controlling password length, strength and change frequency.
h. Control of Passwords - State Street personnel must maintain the confidentiality of system passwords, keys, and passcodes used for the protection of Funds Data must not be hard-coded into any scripts.
i. Account Lockout - State Street must deploy controls to lock accounts when no more than five invalid login attempts are made.
j. Password Reset State Street must employ a secure and documented process to reset passwords that requires verification of user identity prior to password reset.
9. |
Encryption Requirements. |
a. Encryption Standards - State Street will define in its Security Policy minimum standards for encryption methods and strength.
b. Encryption at Rest - State Street shall encrypt any laptops, mobile devices (e.g. Blackberries, PDAs), containing Funds Data used by State Streets personnel using an industry recognized encryption algorithm with at least 256 bit encryption AES (or equivalent).
c. Encryption Key Management - State Street must document procedures for managing encryption keys as well as any salts used to protect one way hashing functions.
These procedures must include specifications for key provisioning, distribution, revocation, and expiration.
10. |
Use of Laptop and Mobile Devices in connection with the Agreement. |
a. Secure Storage - State Street shall require that all laptops and mobile devices be securely stored whenever out of the personnels immediate possession.
b. State Street shall maintain the ability to remotely remove Funds Data promptly from mobile phones managed by State Street.
c. Bring Your Own Device - State Street shall ensure security controls, including, mobile device management (MDM), remote wipe capabilities and encryption must be in place if Funds Data can be stored, accessed, transmitted to or from, or used on a personal device. State Street must have policies to ensure State Street personnel maintain the security of these devices.
11. |
Information Systems Acquisition Development and Maintenance. |
a. Funds Data Funds Data shall only be used by State Street for the purposes specified in the Agreement.
b. Virus Management - State Street shall maintain a malware protection program designed to (i) deter malware infections; (ii) detect the presence of malware within the State Street environment; and (iii) recover from any impact caused by malware.
12. |
Incident Event and Communications Management. |
a. Incident Management/Notification of Breach - State Street shall develop and implement an incident response plan that specifies actions to be taken when State Street or one of its subcontractors suspects or detects that a party has gained unauthorized access to Funds Data or systems or applications containing any Funds Data (the Response Plan). It must be approved by management, and have an owner to maintain and review the program. Such Response Plan shall include the following:
i. Escalation Procedures - An escalation procedure that includes notification to senior managers and appropriate reporting to regulatory and law enforcement agencies. This procedure shall provide for reporting of incidents that compromise the confidentiality of Funds Data (including backed up data) to the Funds via telephone or email (and provide a confirmatory notice in writing as soon as practicable); provided that the foregoing notice obligation is excused for such period of time as State Street is prohibited by law, rule, regulation or other governmental authority from notifying the Funds.
ii. Incident Reporting - State Street will use commercially reasonable efforts to promptly furnish to the Funds information that State Street has regarding the general circumstances and extent of such unauthorized access.
iii. Investigation and Prevention - State Street shall reasonably assist the Funds in investigating of any such unauthorized access and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to: (A) cooperate with the Funds in its efforts to comply with statutory notice or other legal obligations applicable to the Funds or its clients arising out of unauthorized access and to seek injunctive or other equitable relief; (B) cooperate with Client in litigation and investigations against third parties reasonably necessary to protect its proprietary rights; and (C) take
reasonable actions necessary to prevent mitigate against loss from any such authorized access.
13. |
Client Data Outside the United States. |
a. Storage, access, transmission or use of Funds Data from a location outside the U.S. must be conducted from a State Street location designed to promote the security and confidentiality of data. Specific security controls may vary from one location to another, based on local jurisdictional limitations and risk practices, but all locations outside the U.S. are subject to State Streets minimum security standards which may include:
b. Card key access
c. Access limited to only authorized persons with a business need are granted access
d. Visitor badges and State Street identification tags
e. Closed Circuit TV (CCTV) cameras at site and/or floor entrance and recordings stored and available for thirty (30) to ninety (90) days
f. Lobby security, alarm, video, packages subject to search.
g. True floor to true ceiling construction.
h. Glass, wood, or steel doors.
CERTIFICATE OF SIGNING AUTHORITY AND INCUMBENCY
I, Christopher M, Rohrbacher, hereby certify that I am a Vice President of each Nuveen registered investment ocmpany, duly organized and validly existing under the laws of its respective jurisdiction (each a Trust), and further certify in such capacity that the following individual, acting singly, has been authorized to act in the name and on behalf of each Trust and to sign, acknowledge, deliver and accept delivery of agreements and other documents in connection with securities lending transactions and that the true signature of such individual is shown below opposite his name, and State Street Bank and Trust Company may rely upon this certificate until such time as it receives another certificate bearing a later date.
Name Title Specimen Signature
E. Scott Wickerham, Vice President and Controller /s/ E. Scott Wickerham
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of August, 2020
/s/ Christopher M. Rohrbacher |
Christopher M. Rohrbacher |
Vice President |
I, Mark J. Czarniecki, hereby certify that Christopher M. Rohrbacher is a duly elected, qualified and acting Vice President of each Trust , and his signature appearing above is his/her own true signature.
/s/ Mark J. Czarniecki |
Mark J. Czarniecki |
Vice President or Assistant Vice President and Assistant Secretary |
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form N-1A of Nuveen Investment Funds, Inc. of our report dated August 27, 2020, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights, which appears in the Nuveen Credit Income Fund (formerly known as Nuveen High Income Bond Fund) and Nuveen Strategic Income Funds Annual Report on Form
N-CSR for the year ended June 30, 2020. We also consent to the references to us under the headings Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm and Financial Highlights in such Registration Statement.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chicago, Illinois
October 26, 2020