7

Table of Contents

8

Table of Contents

9

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

Investing in our Class A common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this prospectus, including our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes, before deciding to invest in our Class A common stock. The occurrence of any of the events described below could harm our business, operating results, financial condition, liquidity, or prospects. In any such event, the market price of our Class A common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, may also impair our business. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Most Material Risks to Us

Our success and ability to grow our business depend in part on retaining and expanding our member base. If we fail to add new members or retain current members, our business, revenue, operating results, and financial condition could be harmed.

We currently derive substantially all of our revenue from direct policy premiums, which is primarily driven by the number of members covered by our health plans. As a result, the size of our member base is critical to our success. We have experienced significant member growth since we commenced operations; however, we may not be able to maintain this growth, and our member base could decrease rapidly or shrink over time.

Attracting new members depends, in large part, on our ability to continue to be perceived as providing a superior member experience, competitive pricing, access to competitive provider networks and quality providers, and competitive insurance coverage relative to other insurers in the same geographic and insurance markets. Some of the health insurers with which we compete have greater financial and other resources, offer a broader scope of products, and may be able to price their products more competitively than ours. Many of them also have relationships with more providers and provider groups than we do, and so are able to offer a larger network and/or obtain better unit cost economics.

Additionally, our ability to attract new members and retain existing members depends in part on the Health Insurance Marketplaces, which we rely on to promote our health plans and increase our membership, and insurance brokers, who help us identify and enroll new members and generally assist with marketing our products and plans.

If we fail to remain competitive on member experience, pricing, and insurance coverage options, our ability to grow our business and generate revenue by attracting and retaining members may be adversely affected. There are many other factors that could negatively affect our ability to grow our member base, including if:

21

Table of Contents

Our inability to overcome these challenges could impair our ability to attract new members and retain existing members, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, revenue, operating results, and financial condition.

Our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be harmed if we fail to execute our growth strategy.

Our growth strategy includes, without limitation, the acquisition of additional members in existing and new markets and states, introducing new products and plans, and monetizing our technology.

We are expanding rapidly by entering into new markets and introducing new health plans in the markets in which we currently operate. As of the date of this prospectus, our health insurance subsidiaries operate in 18 states, 15 of which we expanded to since 2017. As our business grows, we may incur significant expenses prior to commencement of operations and the receipt of revenue in new markets or from new plans, including significant time and expense in obtaining the regulatory approvals and licenses necessary to grow our operations. For example, in order to obtain a certificate of authority to market and sell insurance in most jurisdictions, we must establish a provider network and demonstrate our ability to perform or delegate utilization management and other administrative functions. We are also required to contribute capital to fund capital and surplus requirements, escrows, or contingency guaranties, which may, at times, be significant. Even if we are successful in obtaining a certificate of authority, regulators may not approve our proposed benefit designs, provider networks, or premium levels, or may require us to change them in ways that harm our profitability. Further, even if we successfully attract members in sufficient numbers to cover our costs, the new business could fail, which could not only result in financial harm, but also reputational harm to our brand. We may also experience delays in operational start dates. Even if we are successful in establishing a profitable new health plan or entering a new market, increasing membership, revenues and medical costs could trigger increased risk-based capital, or RBC, requirements that could substantially exceed the net income generated by the health plan or in the new market. In such circumstances, we may not be able to fund on a timely basis, or at all, the increased RBC requirements with our available cash resources. As we expand, if competitors seek to retain market share by reducing prices, we may be forced to reduce our prices on similar plan offerings in order to remain competitive, which could impact our financial condition and may require a change in our operating strategies. It is difficult to predict the full effect of pricing changes. Even if we reduce the pricing of our plans, our resulting membership enrollment could be lower than anticipated and our growth could stall. As a result of these factors, entering new markets or introducing new health plans may decrease our profitability. In addition, we are continuously updating and developing new technology for our providers. If our providers do not utilize the technology we deploy to them, we may not be able to efficiently and cost-effectively operate our business.

22

Table of Contents

As we expand our product offerings and enter new markets, we need to establish our reputation and brand with new members, and to the extent we are not successful in creating positive impressions, our business in these newer markets could be adversely affected. There can also be no assurance that we will be able to maintain or enhance our reputation and brand in our existing markets, and failure to do so could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We also pursue opportunistic partnerships and acquisitions to allow us to provide better health care options for our members as well as to augment existing operations, and we may be in discussions with respect to one or more partnerships or acquisitions at any given time. For example, we recently entered into a partnership with Cigna to exclusively provide commercial health plans to small businesses, for which we made a significant investment in financial and other resources. Partnerships or other acquisition opportunities that we enter into may not perform as well as expected, may not achieve timely profitability or expected synergies, may expose us to additional liability, or may limit our ability to offer products in certain insurance markets and geographic regions.

We may also pursue opportunities to monetize our platform, including through platform arrangements, such as our recent arrangement with Health First. We may not be able to perform these platform arrangements as well as expected, and these arrangements may pose operational challenges, may not achieve timely profitability, may expose us to additional liability, or may limit our ability to offer products in certain insurance markets and geographic regions.

We expect that our growth strategy will continue to focus on opportunities in existing and new markets and states for the foreseeable future, which will require significant dedication of management attention and financial resources. If we are unable to effectively execute our growth strategy, our future growth will suffer, and our results of operations could be harmed.

We have a history of losses, and we may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future.

We have not been profitable since our inception in 2012 and had an accumulated deficit of $1,012.9 million and $1,427.1 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2020, respectively. We incurred net losses of $261.2 million and $406.8 million in the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020, respectively. We expect to make significant investments to further market, develop, and expand our business, including by continuing to develop our full stack technology platform and member engagement engine, acquiring more members, maintaining existing members and investing in partnerships, collaborations and acquisitions. In addition, we expect to continue to increase our headcount in the coming years. As a public company, we will also incur significant legal, accounting, compliance, and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The commissions we offer to brokers could also increase significantly as we compete to attract new members. We will continue to make such investments to grow our business. Despite these investments, we may not succeed in increasing our revenue on the timeline that we expect or in an amount sufficient to lower our net loss and ultimately become profitable. Moreover, if our revenue declines, we may not be able to reduce costs in a timely manner because many of our costs are fixed, at least in the short-term. If we are unable to manage our costs effectively, this may limit our ability to optimize our business model, acquire new members, and grow our revenues. Accordingly, despite our best efforts to do so, we may not achieve or maintain profitability, and we may continue to incur significant losses in the future.

Any potential repeal of, changes to, or judicial challenges to the ACA, could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The enactment of the ACA in March 2010 transformed the U.S. health care delivery system through a series of complex initiatives; however, the ACA continues to face judicial challenges, as well as efforts to repeal or change certain of its significant provisions. For the years ended December 31,

23

Table of Contents

2019 and 2020, approximately 96% and 95%, respectively, of our revenue was derived from sales of health plans subject to regulation under the ACA, primarily comprised of policies directly purchased by individuals and families and secondarily comprised of policies purchased by small employers and provided to their employees as a benefit. Consequently, changes to, or repeal of, portions or the entirety of the ACA, as well as judicial interpretations in response to legal and other constitutional challenges, could materially and adversely affect our business and financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Even if the ACA is not amended or repealed, elected and appointed officials could continue to propose changes impacting the ACA, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

The ACA’s provisions include the establishment of Health Insurance Marketplaces. The ACA also established significant subsidies to support the purchase of health insurance by individuals, in the form of advanced premium tax credits, or APTCs, available through Health Insurance Marketplaces. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020, the direct policy premiums of approximately 43% and 60%, respectively, of our members were subsidized by APTCs. Additionally, the ACA implemented certain requirements for insurers, including changes to Medicare Advantage payments and a minimum MLR provision that requires insurers to pay rebates to consumers when insurers do not meet or exceed specified annual MLR thresholds. The ACA also established anti-discrimination protections on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, and disability, which may impact the manner in which health insurers receiving any form of federal financial assistance design and implement their benefit packages. Further, the ACA imposes significant fees, assessments, and taxes on us and other health insurers, plans and other industry participants. As of December 31, 2020, we offered Individual plans through the Health Insurance Marketplaces in 15 states, which represented approximately 79% of our total membership.

There have been significant efforts to repeal, or limit implementation of, certain provisions of the ACA. Such initiatives include repeal of the individual mandate effective in 2019, as well as easing of the regulatory restrictions placed on short-term limited duration insurance and association health plans, some or all of which may provide fewer benefits than the traditional ACA-mandated insurance benefits. The perceived uncertainty and possible changes in the Health Insurance Marketplaces could result in reduced participation from individuals seeking insurance coverage and possible non-renewal of existing policies. Because we rely on the Health Insurance Marketplaces to promote our Individual and some of our Small Group products and increase membership, reduced participation in such marketplaces could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Also, although individuals would still be able to purchase coverage, possibly through marketplaces that continue to be maintained by certain states or by purchasing coverage directly from an insurer, the elimination of subsidies would make such coverage unaffordable to some individuals and could thereby reduce overall membership. Further, the federal government’s continued refusal to fund cost sharing subsidies and/or withdrawal of APTCs could additionally impact marketplace enrollment, although we may expect some changes to the foregoing with President Joe Biden’s new administration. These market and political dynamics may increase the risk that our Health Insurance Marketplace products will be selected by individuals who have a higher risk profile or utilization rate or lower subsidization rate than we anticipated when we established the pricing for products on Health Insurance Marketplaces, possibly leading to financial losses.

The constitutionality of the ACA itself continues to face judicial challenge. In December 2018, a partial summary judgment ruling by a federal district court in Texas v. United States of America held that the ACA’s individual mandate requirement—which was set to $0 by Congress in 2017—was essential to the ACA, and, without it, the remainder of the ACA was invalid (i.e., that it was not “severable” from the ACA). That decision was appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which agreed with the district court in December 2019 that the individual mandate was unconstitutional, but remanded the case to the district court for additional analysis on the question of severability of the

24

Table of Contents

remainder of the ACA. In January 2020, both plaintiffs and defendants appealed the Fifth Circuit’s decision to the Supreme Court, which granted a writ of certiorari in March 2020. Oral argument took place on November 10, 2020 in the case now captioned California v. Texas. The Supreme Court’s decision could end the case, or it could result in the case being sent back to the lower courts for continued litigation. The ACA remains in effect until judicial review of the decision is concluded, and the ultimate content, timing, or effect of any outcome of the lawsuit cannot be predicted. In the interim, Congress and President Biden may consider other legislation and/or executive orders to change elements of the ACA, including for example, the January 18, 2021 Executive Order issued by President Biden directing the Secretary of HHS to consider opening a Special Enrollment Period from February 15, 2021 through May 14, 2021 for the Health Insurance Marketplace as well as directing federal agencies to examine all existing regulations, orders, guidance documents, policies and similar agency actions to determine if any such actions are inconsistent with the policy set forth in the Executive Order to protect and strengthen Medicaid and the ACA and make high-quality healthcare accessible and affordable for every American.

These changes to the ACA and other potential changes involving the functioning of the Health Insurance Marketplaces as a result of new legislation, regulation, or executive action, could materially impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Failure to accurately estimate our incurred medical expenses or effectively manage our medical costs or related administrative costs could negatively affect our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

Our profitability depends, to a significant degree, on our ability to accurately estimate and effectively manage our medical expenses. Because the premiums are set in advance of the policy year based on a projection of future expenses, our overall financial results are sensitive to changes in our medical expenses. For example, if our medical expenses for the policy year 2020 had been one percentage point higher, this would have resulted in an approximately $13.6 million increase in our net loss after taking into account risk adjustment determinations and reinsurance. Changes in health care regulations and practices, the level of utilization of health care services, hospital and pharmaceutical costs, and to the broader competitive landscape, disasters, the potential effects of climate change, major epidemics, pandemics, or newly emergent viruses (such as COVID-19), continued inequity and racial discrimination in the U.S. health care system, and the resulting physical and mental health costs in broader society, new medical technologies, new pharmaceuticals, increases in provider fraud, and other external factors, including general economic conditions such as inflation and unemployment levels, are generally beyond our control and could reduce our ability to accurately estimate and effectively control the costs of providing health benefits.

Due to the time lag between when services are actually rendered by providers and when we receive, process, and pay a claim for those services, our medical expenses include a provision for claims incurred but not paid. We are continuously enhancing our process for estimating claims liability, which we monitor and refine on a monthly basis as claims receipts, payment information, and inpatient acuity information becomes available. As more complete information becomes available, we adjust the amount of the estimate, and include the changes in estimates in expenses in the period in which the changes are identified. Given the uncertainties inherent in such estimates, there can be no assurance that our claims liability estimate will be adequate, and any adjustments to the estimate may unfavorably impact, potentially in a material way, our reported results of operations and financial condition. Further, our inability to estimate our claims liability may also affect our ability to take timely corrective actions, further exacerbating the extent of any adverse effect on our results.

Additionally, when we expand our product offerings, we have limited information with which to develop our anticipated claims liability. Changes to (or new or revised interpretations of) subregulatory

25

Table of Contents

guidance, regulations, or statutes that govern Health Insurance Marketplaces, including, but not limited to, those governing eligibility criteria, Special Enrollment Periods, and minimum benefits requirements, may pose difficulty in estimating our claims liability.

From time to time in the past, our actual results have varied from those expected, particularly in times of significant changes in the number of our members. If it is determined that our estimates are significantly different than actual results, our results of operations and financial position could be adversely affected.

Risks Related to the Regulatory Framework that Governs Us

Our business activities are subject to ongoing, complex, and evolving regulatory obligations, and to continued regulatory review, which result in significant additional expense and the diversion of our management’s time and efforts. If we fail to comply with regulatory requirements, or are unable to meet performance standards applicable to our business, our operations could be disrupted or we may become subject to significant penalties.

We operate in a highly regulated industry and we must comply with numerous and complex state and federal laws and regulations to operate our business, including requirements to maintain or renew our regulatory approvals or obtain new regulatory approvals to sell insurance and to sell specific health plans. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners, or NAIC, has adopted the Annual Financial Reporting Model Regulation, or the Model Audit Rule, which, where adopted by states, requires expanded governance practices, risk and solvency assessment reporting, and filing of periodic financial and operating reports. Most states have adopted these or similar measures to expand the scope of regulations relating to corporate governance and internal control activities of health maintenance organizations, or HMOs, and insurance companies. We are also required to notify, or obtain approval from, federal and/or state regulatory authorities prior to taking various actions as a business, including making changes to our network, service offerings, and the coverage of our health plans, as well as prior to entering into relationships with certain vendors and health organizations.

In each of the markets in which we operate, we are regulated by the relevant insurance and/or health and/or human services, or other government departments that oversee the activities of insurance and/or health care organizations providing or arranging to provide services to Medicare Advantage members, Health Insurance Marketplace enrollees, or other beneficiaries. For example, our health insurance subsidiaries must comply with minimum statutory capital and other financial solvency requirements, such as deposit and surplus requirements, and related reporting requirements. Our health insurance subsidiaries must also comply with numerous statutes and regulations governing the sale, marketing, and administration of insurance. Additionally, our health insurance subsidiaries may be required to maintain dedicated personnel and physical offices in certain jurisdictions where we operate.

The frequent enactment of, amendments to, or changes in interpretations of laws and regulations could, among other things: require us to restructure our relationships with providers within our network; require us to contract with additional providers at unfavorable terms; require us to cover certain forms of care provided by out-of-network providers at rates or levels indicated by rule or statute; require us to implement changes to our health care services and types of coverage, or prevent us from innovating and evolving; restrict revenue and enrollment growth; increase our sales, marketing, and administrative costs; impose additional capital and surplus requirements; make it more difficult to obtain regulatory approvals to operate our business or maintain existing regulatory approvals; prevent or delay us from entering into new service areas or product lines; and increase or change our liability to members in the event of malpractice by our contracted providers. The evolving regulatory landscape requires a significant investment of time and resources to ensure compliance with new and changing laws and

26

Table of Contents

regulations. In addition, changes in political party legislative majorities or executive branch administrations at the state or federal level in the United States may change the attitude towards health care programs and result in changes to the existing legislative or regulatory environment.

The federal government periodically considers reducing or reallocating the amount of money it spends for Medicare. Furthermore, Medicare remains subject to the automatic spending reductions imposed by the Budget Control Act of 2011 and the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, subject to a 2% cap, which was extended by subsequent legislative amendments through 2030. We anticipate this and any future similar initiatives will require government agencies to find funding alternatives, which may result in reductions in funding for programs, contraction of covered benefits, and limited or no premium rate increases, or premium rate decreases.

Additionally, the taxes and fees that we are required to pay to federal, state, and local governments may increase due to several factors, including: enactment of, changes to, or interpretations of, tax laws and regulations, audits by governmental authorities, and geographic expansions into higher taxing jurisdictions.

The governmental health care programs in which we participate are subject to a myriad of rules, regulations, and subregulatory guidance, as well as third party and publicly administered performance standards. For example, a portion of each Medicare Advantage plan’s reimbursement is tied to the plan’s Star Rating, as published by CMS, with those plans receiving a rating of four (4.0) or more stars eligible for quality-based bonus payments. A plan’s Star Rating affects its image in the market, and plans that perform well are able to offer enhanced benefits and market more effectively. Medicare Advantage plans with Star Ratings of five (5.0) stars are eligible for year-round open enrollment; conversely, plans with lower Star Ratings have more restricted times for enrollment of beneficiaries. Medicare Advantage plans with Star Ratings of less than three (3.0) stars for three consecutive years are denoted as “low performing” plans on the CMS website and in the CMS “Medicare and You” handbook. In addition, in 2019, CMS had its authority reinstated to terminate Medicare Advantage contracts for plans rated below three (3.0) stars for three consecutive years. As a result, Medicare Advantage plans that achieve higher Star Ratings may have competitive advantage over plans with lower Star Ratings. As of December 31, 2020, none of our health plans were eligible to receive Star Ratings because of our recent market entry. The Star Rating system is subject to change annually by CMS, which may make it more difficult to achieve and maintain three (3.0) Star Ratings or greater in the future. Our health insurance subsidiaries’ operating results, premium revenue, and benefit offerings will likely depend significantly on their Star Ratings, and there can be no assurances that we will be successful in achieving favorable Star Ratings or maintaining or improving our Star Ratings once achieved. Similarly, health care accreditation agencies such as the National Committee for Quality Assurance, or NCQA, evaluate health plans based on various criteria, including effectiveness of care and member satisfaction. Health insurers seeking accreditation from NCQA must pass a rigorous, comprehensive review, and must annually report their performance. If we fail to achieve and maintain accreditation from agencies, such as NCQA, we could lose the ability to offer our health plans on Health Insurance Marketplaces, or in certain jurisdictions, which would materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.    

Additionally, there are numerous steps federal and state regulators require for continued implementation of the ACA. If we fail to effectively implement or appropriately adjust our operational and strategic initiatives with respect to the implementation of health care reform, or do not do so as effectively as our competitors, our results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Although we strive to comply with all existing regulations and to meet performance standards applicable to our business, failure to meet these requirements could result in financial fines, inability to obtain new regulatory approvals to sell insurance or health plans, inability to obtain regulatory approval

27

Table of Contents

to expand our geographic service area, inability to obtain new regulatory approvals to offer administrative services, revocation of existing licenses to offer insurance or administrative services, other penalties, and reputational harm.

Changes or developments in the health insurance markets in the United States, including passage and implementation of a law to create a single-payer or government-run health insurance program, could materially and adversely harm our business and operating results.

Our business is within the public and private sectors of the U.S. health insurance system, which are evolving quickly and subject to a changing regulatory environment, and our future financial performance will depend in part on growth in the market for private health insurance, as well as our ability to adapt to regulatory developments. Changes and developments in the health insurance system in the United States could reduce demand for our services and harm our business. For example, there has been an ongoing national debate relating to the health insurance system in the United States. Certain elected officials have introduced proposals to expand the Medicare program, ranging from proposals that would create a new single-payer national health insurance program for all United States residents, replacing virtually all other sources of public and private insurance, to more incremental approaches, such as lowering the age of eligibility for the Medicare program, expanding Medicare to a larger population, or creating a new public health insurance option that would compete with private insurers. Additionally, proposals to establish a single-payer or government-run health care system at the state level are regularly introduced in some of our key states, such as New York and California. At the federal level, President Biden and Congress may consider other legislation and/or executive orders to change elements of the ACA. In December 2019, a federal appeals court held that the individual mandate portion of the ACA was unconstitutional and left open the question whether the remaining provisions of the ACA would be valid without the individual mandate. On November 10, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in this matter, and is in the process of reviewing this case. A decision is expected in 2021. On January 28, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order that iterates the policy of the Administration to protect and strengthen Medicaid and the ACA, making high-quality healthcare accessible and affordable to all Americans and directs the Secretary of HHS to consider opening a Special Enrollment Period for Americans to seek Individual market coverage through the Health Insurance Marketplace. On the same day in response to the President’s Executive Order, the Secretary of HHS announced a Special Enrollment Period from February 15, 2021 through May 15, 2021, for uninsured and under-insured individuals and families to seek coverage through the Health Insurance Marketplace. The Executive Order also directs federal agencies to examine agency actions to determine whether they are consistent with that the Administration’s commitment regarding the ACA, and begin rulemaking to suspend, revise, or rescind any inconsistent actions. Areas of focus include policies or practices that may reduce affordability of coverage, present unnecessary barriers to coverage, or undermine protections for people with preexisting conditions. We continue to evaluate the effect that the ACA and its possible modifications, repeal and replacement has on our business.

If we fail to comply with applicable privacy, security, and data laws, regulations and standards, including with respect to third-party service providers that utilize sensitive personal information on our behalf, or applicable consumer protection laws, our business, reputation, results of operations, financial position, and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

As part of our normal operations, we collect, process, and retain confidential information about individuals. We are subject to various federal and state laws and rules regarding the collection, use, disclosure, storage, transmission, and destruction of confidential information about individuals. For example, we are subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH, which require us to protect the privacy, security, and confidentiality of medical records and protected

28

Table of Contents

health information, or PHI, that we collect, disseminate, maintain, and use. HIPAA applies national privacy and security standards for PHI to covered entities, including health insurers and certain types of health care providers, and their service providers that access, create, receive, use, or maintain PHI, known as business associates. HIPAA requires covered entities and business associates to maintain policies and procedures governing PHI that is used or disclosed, and to implement administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect PHI, including PHI maintained, used, and disclosed in electronic form. These safeguards include employee training, identifying business associates with whom covered entities need to enter into HIPAA-compliant contractual arrangements, and various other measures. Health insurers and other covered entities are also required to report impermissible uses or disclosures of PHI to affected individuals and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, unless the covered entity demonstrates through a risk assessment that there is low probability the PHI has been compromised, and to notify the media in any states where 500 or more people are impacted by any unauthorized release or use of or access to PHI. Ongoing implementation and oversight of these measures involves significant time, effort, and expense. While we undertake substantial efforts to secure the PHI that we maintain, use, and disclose in electronic form, a cyber-attack or other intrusion that bypasses our information security systems causing an information security breach, loss of PHI, confidential member information, or other data subject to privacy laws or a material disruption of our operational systems could result in a material adverse impact on our business, along with potentially substantial fines and penalties.

HIPAA and HITECH also established new enforcement mechanisms and enhanced penalties for failure to comply with specific standards relating to the privacy, security, and electronic transmission of PHI. If a person knowingly or intentionally obtains or discloses PHI in violation of HIPAA requirements, criminal penalties may also be imposed. HIPAA authorizes state Attorneys General to file suit under HIPAA on behalf of state residents. Courts can award damages, costs, and attorneys’ fees related to violations of HIPAA in such cases. While HIPAA does not create a private right of action allowing individuals to sue us in civil court for HIPAA violations, its standards have been used as the basis for a duty of care in state civil suits such as those for negligence or recklessness in the misuse or breach of PHI. It is possible that Congress may enact additional legislation in the future to increase the amount or application of penalties, and to create a private right of action under HIPAA, which could entitle patients to seek monetary damages for violations of the privacy rules.

State laws may apply to our collection, use, handling, processing, destruction, disclosure, and storage of personal information as well. States have begun enacting more comprehensive privacy laws and regulations addressing consumer rights to data protection or transparency that may affect our privacy and security practices. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, or the CCPA, effective as of January 1, 2020, gives California residents expanded rights to access and require deletion of their personal information, opt out of certain personal information sharing, and receive detailed information about how their personal information is used. The CCPA also provides for civil penalties for violations, as well as a private right of action for data breaches that may increase data breach litigation. Further, a new California privacy law, the California Privacy Rights Act, or CPRA, was passed by California voters on November 3, 2020. The CPRA will create additional obligations with respect to processing and storing personal information that are scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2023 (with certain provisions having retroactive effect to January 1, 2022). The CCPA and CPRA contain exemptions for medical information governed by the California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, and for PHI collected by a covered entity or business associate governed by the privacy, security, and breach notification rule established pursuant to HIPAA and HITECH, but the precise interpretation and application of this exemption by regulators is not yet clear.

With laws and regulations, such as HIPAA and the CCPA, imposing relatively burdensome obligations, and with substantial uncertainty over the interpretation and application of these and other laws and regulations to our business, we may face challenges in addressing their requirements and

29

Table of Contents

making necessary changes to our policies and practices, and may incur significant costs and expenses in our effort to do so. For example, the increased consumer control over the sharing of personal information under the CCPA may affect members’ ability to share such personal information with us, or may require us to delete or remove member information from our records or data sets, which may create considerable costs or loss of revenue for our organization.

In addition, certain of our businesses are also subject to the Payment Card Industry, or PCI, Data Security Standard, which is a multifaceted security standard that is designed to protect credit card account data as mandated by PCI entities. We rely on vendors to assist us with PCI matters and to ensure PCI compliance. Our business and operations are also subject to federal, state, and local consumer protection laws, including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA, which places restrictions on the use of automated tools and technologies to communicate with wireless telephone subscribers or communications services consumers generally. Despite our compliance efforts, we may become subject to claims that we have violated the PCI Data Security Standard, the TCPA or other telemarketing laws based on past, present, or future business practices, which could have an adverse impact on our business and reputation.

In addition, any failure or perceived failure by us to maintain posted privacy policies which are accurate, comprehensive and fully implemented, and any violation or perceived violation of our privacy-, data protection-, or information security-related obligations to members, users, or other third parties or any of our other legal obligations relating to privacy, data protection, or information security may result in governmental investigations or enforcement actions, litigation, claims, or public statements against us by consumer advocacy groups or others, and could result in significant liability, loss of relationships with key third parties, including telecommunications carriers, social media networks, and other data providers, or cause our consumers to lose trust in us, which could have material impact on our revenue and operations.

Despite our best attempts to maintain adherence to information privacy and security best practices, as well as compliance with applicable laws, rules, and contractual requirements, our facilities and systems, and those of our third-party service providers, may be vulnerable to privacy or security breaches, acts of vandalism or theft, malware, ransomware, or other forms of cyber-attack, misplaced or lost data including paper or electronic media, programming and/or human errors, or other similar events. In the past, we have experienced, and disclosed to applicable regulatory authorities, data breaches resulting in disclosure of confidential or PHI. Although none of these data breaches have resulted in any material financial loss or penalty to date, future data breaches could require us to expend significant resources to remediate any damage, interrupt our operations and damage our reputation, subject us to state or federal agency review and could also result in regulatory enforcement actions, material fines and penalties, litigation or other actions which could have a material adverse effect on our business, reputation and results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.

We are subject to extensive fraud, waste, and abuse laws that may give rise to lawsuits and claims against us, the outcome of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations.

Because we receive payments from federal governmental agencies, we are subject to various laws commonly referred to as “fraud, waste, and abuse” laws, including the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, the federal Physician Self-Referral Law, or Stark Law, and the federal False Claims Act, or FCA. These laws permit the Department of Justice, or DOJ, the HHS Office of Inspector General, or OIG, CMS, and other enforcement authorities to institute a claim, action, investigation, or other proceeding against us for violations and, depending on the facts and circumstances, to seek treble damages, criminal and civil fines, penalties, and assessments. Violations of these laws can also result in exclusion, debarment, temporary or permanent suspension from participation in government health

30

Table of Contents

care programs, the institution of corporate integrity agreements, or CIAs, and/or other heightened monitoring of our operations. Liability under such statutes and regulations may arise, among other things, if we knew, or it is determined that we should have known, that information we provided to form the basis for a claim for government payment was false or fraudulent, or that we were out of compliance with program requirements considered material to the government’s payment decision. Fraud, waste and abuse prohibitions encompass a wide range of activities, including, but not limited to, kickbacks or other inducements for referral of members or for the coverage of products (such as prescription drugs) by a plan, billing for unnecessary medical services by a health care provider, payments made to excluded providers, and improper marketing and beneficiary inducements.

The DOJ and the OIG have continuously increased their scrutiny of health care payers and providers, and Medicare Advantage insurers, under the FCA, in particular, which has led to a number of investigations, prosecutions, convictions, and settlements in the health care industry. We expect this trend to continue, particularly in light of the HHS’s December 4, 2020 announcement regarding the creation of a new False Claims Act Working Group aimed at enhancing HHS’s partnership with the DOJ to combat fraud and abuse. CMS and the OIG also periodically perform risk adjustment data validation, or RADV, audits of selected Medicare Advantage health insurance plans to validate the coding practices of, and supporting documentation maintained by health care providers. Certain of our health plans may be selected for such audits, which could in the future result in retrospective adjustments to payments made to our health plans, fines, corrective action plans, or other adverse action by CMS. On November 24, 2020, CMS issued a final rule that amends the RADV program by: (i) revising the methodology for error rate calculations beginning with the 2019 benefit year; and (ii) changing the way CMS applies RADV results to risk adjustment transfers beginning with the 2020 benefit year. According to CMS, these changes are designed to give insurers more stability and predictability with respect to the RADV program and promote fairness in how health insurers receive adjustments. However, the future impact of these changes remains unclear, and such changes may ultimately increase financial recoveries from the government’s ability to retrospectively claw back or recover funds from health insurers.

In particular, there has recently been increased scrutiny by the government on health insurers’ diagnosis coding and risk adjustment practices, particularly for Medicare Advantage plans. In some proceedings involving Medicare Advantage plans, there have been allegations that certain financial arrangements with providers violate other laws governing fraud and abuse, such as the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. Health insurers are required to maintain compliance programs to prevent, detect and remediate fraud, waste, and abuse, and are often the subject of fraud, waste, and abuse investigations and audits. We perform ongoing monitoring of our compliance with CMS risk adjustment requirements and other applicable laws. We also monitor our provider payment practices and relationships with other third parties whose products and services we reimburse (e.g., pharmaceutical manufacturers) to ensure compliance with applicable laws, including, but not limited to, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute. While we believe our compliance efforts and relationships with providers and other third parties comply with applicable laws, we may be subject to audits, reviews, and investigations of our practices and arrangements by government agencies.

The regulations, contractual requirements, and policies applicable to participants in government health care programs are complex and subject to change. Moreover, many of the laws, rules, and regulations in this area have not been well-interpreted by applicable regulatory agencies or the courts. Additionally, the significant increase in actions brought under the FCA’s “whistleblower” or “qui tam” provisions, which allow private individuals to bring actions on behalf of the government, has caused greater numbers of health care companies to have to defend a false claim action, pay fines, or agree to enter into a CIA to avoid being excluded from Medicare and other state and federal health care programs as a result of an investigation arising out of such action. Health plans and providers often seek to resolve these types of allegations through settlement for significant and material amounts,

31

Table of Contents

even when they do not acknowledge or admit liability, to avoid the uncertainty of treble damages that may be awarded in litigation proceedings. Such settlements often contain additional compliance and reporting requirements as part of a consent decree or settlement agreement, including, for example, CIAs, deferred prosecution agreements, or non-prosecution agreements. If we are subject to liability under qui tam or other actions or settlements, our business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations could be adversely affected.

Risks Related to our Business

If we are unable to arrange for the delivery of quality care, and maintain good relations with the physicians, hospitals, and other providers within and outside our provider networks, or if we are unable to enter into cost-effective contracts with such providers, our profitability could be adversely affected.

Our profitability depends, in large part, upon our ability to contract at competitive prices with hospitals, physicians, and other health care providers, such that we can provide our members with access to competitive provider networks. Our provider arrangements with primary care physicians, specialists, hospitals, and other health care providers generally may be terminated or not renewed by either party without cause upon prior written notice. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to continue to renew our existing contracts or enter into new contracts on a timely basis or under favorable terms enabling us to service our members profitably. Health care providers within our provider networks may not properly manage the costs of services, maintain financial solvency or avoid disputes with other providers or their federal and state regulators. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on the provision of services to our members and our operations.

In any particular market or geography, physicians and other health care providers could refuse to contract, demand higher payments, demand favorable contract terms, or take other actions that could result in higher medical costs or difficulty in meeting regulatory or accreditation requirements, among other things. In some markets and geographies, certain health care providers, particularly hospitals, physician/hospital organizations, or multi-specialty physician groups, may have significant positions or near monopolies that could result in diminished bargaining power on our part. In addition, accountable care organizations, clinically integrated networks, independent practice associations, practice management companies (which aggregate physician practices for administrative efficiency and marketing leverage), and other organizational structures that physicians, hospitals and other health care providers choose may change the way in which these providers interact with us, and may change the competitive landscape. Such organizations or groups of health care providers may compete directly with us, which could adversely affect our operations, and our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows by impacting our relationships with these providers or affecting the way that we price our products and estimate our costs, which might require us to incur costs to change our operations. Health care providers in our provider networks may consolidate or merge into hospital systems, resulting in a reduction of providers in our network and in the competitive environment. In addition, if these providers refuse to contract with us, use their market position to negotiate contracts unfavorable to us or place us at a competitive disadvantage, our ability to market products or to be profitable in those areas could be materially and adversely affected.

From time to time, health care providers assert, or threaten to assert, claims seeking to terminate provider agreements. If a provider agreement were terminated, such termination could adversely impact the adequacy of our network to service our members, and may put us at risk of non-compliance with applicable federal and state laws. If we are unable to retain our current provider contract terms or enter into new provider contracts timely or on favorable terms, our profitability may be harmed. In addition, from time to time, we may in the future be subject to class action or other lawsuits by health care providers with respect to claims payment procedures, reimbursement policies, network

32

Table of Contents

participation, or similar matters. In addition, regardless of whether any such lawsuits brought against us are successful or have merit, they will be time-consuming and costly, and could have an adverse impact on our reputation. As a result, under such circumstances, we may be unable to operate our business effectively.

Some providers that render services to our members are not contracted with our health insurance subsidiaries. While our health insurance subsidiaries are required to meet various federal and state requirements regarding the size and composition of our participating provider networks, our business model is based, in the Individual and Medicare Advantage markets, and for certain of our Small Group plans, on contracting with selected health care systems and other providers, not all systems and providers in a given area. This allows us to work more closely with high quality health care systems that engage with us using our technology. That approach, however, makes it possible that our members will receive emergency services, or other services which we are required to cover by law or by the terms of our health plans, from providers who are not contracted with our health insurance subsidiaries. This situation is more likely for our members than for members who choose a plan from a competitor of ours with a broader network. In those cases, there is no pre-established understanding between the provider and our health insurance subsidiary about the amount of compensation that is due to the provider. In some states, and under federal law for our Medicare Advantage business, the amount of compensation is defined by law or regulation, but in most instances, it is either not defined or it is established by a standard that is not unambiguously translatable into dollars. In such instances, providers may claim they are underpaid for their services, and may either litigate or arbitrate their dispute with our health insurance subsidiary. Additionally, many states require us to hold our members harmless for these out-of-network costs, which can be significant. It is difficult to predict the amount we may have to pay to out-of-network providers. The uncertainty of the amount to pay to such providers and the possibility of subsequent adjustment of the payment could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations.

Moreover, the insolvency of one of our partners or providers could expose us to material liabilities. For example, a portion of our specialists and hospitals are paid on a capitated basis. We expect to maintain such arrangements or enter into similar arrangements as we expand. Under certain capitation arrangements, we pay a fixed amount PMPM to the provider without regard to the frequency, extent, or nature of the medical services actually furnished, and such provider is responsible for paying other providers in our network out of the capitation amount. Due to insolvency or other circumstances, such delegated providers with a capitation arrangement may be unable or unwilling to pay claims they have incurred with third party providers in connection with referral services provided to our members. The inability or unwillingness of delegated providers to pay referral claims presents us with both immediate financial risk and potential disruption to member care, as well as potential loss of members. Depending on states’ laws, we may be held liable for such unpaid referral claims even though the delegated provider has contractually assumed such risk. Additionally, competitive pressures or practical regulatory considerations may force us to pay such claims even when we have no legal obligation to do so, or we may have already paid claims to a delegated provider and such payments cannot be recouped when the delegated provider becomes insolvent. Such liabilities incurred or losses suffered as a result of provider insolvency or other circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations.

The result of risk adjustment programs may impact our revenue, add operational complexity, and introduce additional uncertainties that have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows.

The Individual, Small Group, and Medicare Advantage markets we serve employ risk adjustment programs that impact the revenue we recognize for our enrolled membership. As a result of the variability of certain factors that go into the development of the risk adjustment we recognize, such as

33

Table of Contents

risk scores, and other market-level factors where applicable, the actual amount of revenue could be materially more or less than our estimates. Consequently, our estimate of our health plans’ risk scores for any period, and any resulting change in our accrual of revenues related thereto, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, and cash flows. The data provided to CMS to determine the risk score are subject to audit by CMS even several years after the annual settlements occur. If the risk adjustment data we submit are found to incorrectly overstate the health risk of our members, we may be required to refund funds previously received by us and/or be subject to penalties or sanctions, including potential liability under the FCA, which could be significant and would reduce our revenue in the year that repayment or settlement is required. Further, if the data we provide to CMS incorrectly understates the health risk of our members, we might be underpaid for the care that we must provide to our members, which could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial condition.

Significant delays in our receipt of direct policy premiums, including as a result of regulatory restrictions on policy cancellations and non-renewals, could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, cash flows, or earnings.

We currently derive substantially all of our revenue from direct policy premiums and recognize premium revenue over the period that coverage is effective. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020, approximately 57% and 40% of our direct policy premiums, respectively, were collected directly from our members, and approximately 43% and 60% of our direct policy premiums, respectively, were collected from CMS as part of the APTC program. There can be no assurance that we will receive premiums in advance of or by the end of a given coverage period. Moreover, actions taken by state and federal governments could increase the likelihood of delay in our receipt of premiums. For example, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, state insurance departments, including in states in which we operate, issued guidelines, recommendations, and moratoria around policy cancellations and non-renewals due to non-payment. In certain states, departments urged insurers to consider actions that included relaxing due dates for premium payments, extending grace periods, waiving late fees and penalties, and allowing premium payment plans to avoid a lapse in coverage. Certain states also prohibited insurers from terminating plans due to non-payment until a specified date. If such guidelines, recommendations, and moratoria were to remain in place for an extended period of time or if similar measures were introduced due to a resurgence of COVID-19 or for other reasons, including unanticipated public health or economic crises, our receipt of premiums, if any, could be significantly delayed, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, cash flows, or earnings.

We make virtual health care services available to our members through Oscar Medical Group, in which we do not own any equity or voting interest, and our virtual care availability may be disrupted if our arrangements with providers like the Oscar Medical Group become subject to legal challenges.

Our corporate entities are not licensed to practice medicine. Pursuant to state corporate practice of medicine laws, many states in which we operate through our subsidiaries limit the practice of medicine to licensed individuals or professional organizations owned by licensed individuals, and business corporations generally may not exercise control over the medical decisions of physicians. Statutes and regulations relating to the corporate practice of medicine, fee-splitting between physicians and referral sources, and similar issues, vary widely from state to state. Mulberry Management Corporation, one of our subsidiaries, has group participation or management services agreements with three physician-owned professional corporations, known collectively as the Oscar Medical Group. Each of the professional corporations comprising the Oscar Medical Group is wholly owned by one physician licensed in California, Florida, and New York who oversees the operation of the Oscar Medical Group in his capacity as President and sole director of each Oscar Medical Group professional corporation.

34

Table of Contents

He also serves as a consultant to Mulberry Management Corporation. Under the terms of the management services agreements between Mulberry Management Corporation and the Oscar Medical Group, the Oscar Medical Group retains sole responsibility for all medical decisions, as well as for hiring and managing physicians and other licensed health care providers, developing operating policies and procedures, and implementing professional standards and controls. We believe that our services operations comply with applicable state statutes and regulations regarding corporate practice of medicine, fee-splitting, and similar issues. However, regulatory authorities and other parties may assert that, despite the management services agreements and other arrangements through which we operate, we are engaged in the prohibited corporate practice of medicine, that our arrangements constitute unlawful fee-splitting, or that other similar issues exist. To that end, many of the laws, rules, and regulations with respect to corporate practice of medicine are ambiguous and have not been well-interpreted by applicable regulatory agencies or the courts. Moreover, we cannot predict whether changes will be made to existing laws, regulations, or interpretations, or whether new ones will be enacted or adopted, which could cause us to be out of compliance with these requirements. If that were to occur, we could be subject to civil and/or criminal penalties, our agreements could be found legally invalid and unenforceable (in whole or in part), or we could be required to restructure our contractual arrangements, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

Our health insurance subsidiaries have entered into provider participation agreements with the Oscar Medical Group that enable the Oscar Medical Group to participate in Oscar’s provider network. While we expect that our relationship with the Oscar Medical Group will continue, a material change in our relationship with the Oscar Medical Group, whether resulting from a dispute among the entities or the loss of these relationships or contracts with the Oscar Medical Group, may temporarily disrupt our ability to provide virtual health care services to our members and could harm our business.

Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our current business performance, implementation of our business model, and our future prospects.

We launched our business in 2012 and have a limited operating history. Today, our insurance subsidiaries operate in 18 states, 15 of which we expanded to since 2017. Due to our limited operating history and the rapid growth we have experienced since we began operations, there is greater uncertainty in estimating our operating results, and our historical results may not be indicative of, or comparable to, our future results. In addition, we have limited data to validate key aspects of our business model, including our growth strategy. For example, we recently entered into an exclusive strategic partnership with Cigna to offer differentiated health solutions to small businesses. As a relatively new entrant in this market, we have limited experience and are unable to predict whether we will be able to effectively and consistently provide solutions that are tailored to the budgets of small businesses and to the health needs of their employees. We cannot provide any assurance that the data we collect will provide useful measures for evaluating our business model. Moreover, we cannot provide any assurance that partnerships or joint ventures we enter into in the future will perform as well as historical partnerships or expectations. Our inability to adequately assess our performance and growth could have a material adverse effect on our brand, reputation, business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our revenue depends on the direct policy premiums we collect from members who obtain health care services from a limited number of in-network providers, and the loss of any of these providers could result in a material reduction of our membership, which would adversely impact our revenue and operating results.

Almost all of our revenue depends on the direct policy premiums we collect from members or from the federal government on behalf of our members who obtain health care services from a limited

35

Table of Contents

number of providers with whom we contract. We generally manage our provider contracts on a state-by-state basis, entering into separate contracts in each state with local affiliates of a particular provider, such that no one local provider contract receives a majority of our allowed medical costs for services rendered to our members. When aggregating the payments we make to each provider through its local affiliates, however, AdventHealth, Tenet Healthcare Corporation, and HCA Healthcare accounted for a total of approximately 11%, 9%, and 7%, respectively, of total allowable medical costs for the year ended December 31, 2020. We believe that a majority of our revenue will continue to be derived from direct policy premiums obtained from members who receive services from a concentrated number of providers. These providers may terminate or seek to terminate their contracts with us in the future. The sudden loss of any of our providers or the renegotiation of any of our provider contracts could adversely impact our reputation or the quality of our provider networks, which could result in a loss of a membership that adversely affects our revenue and operating results. In the ordinary course of business, we engage in active discussions and renegotiations with providers in respect of the terms of our provider contracts. Certain of our providers may seek to renegotiate or terminate their agreements with us for a variety of reasons, including in response to higher-than-expected health care costs and other market dynamics or financial pressures. These discussions could result in reductions to the fees and changes to the scope of services contemplated by our original provider agreements and, consequently, could negatively impact our revenues, business, and prospects.

Unanticipated changes in population morbidity, including those affecting areas where we are geographically concentrated, could significantly increase utilization rates and medical costs.

Large-scale changes in health care utilization or increases in medical costs can take many forms and may be associated with widespread natural disasters, illness, or medical conditions. The states in which we operate that have the largest concentrations of revenues include Florida, California and Texas. Due to the geographic concentration of our business, we are exposed to heightened risks of potential losses resulting from regional factors. For example, natural disasters, such as a major earthquake, wildfire, or hurricane, affecting regions or states in which we operate, could have a significant impact on the health of a large number of our covered members. Other conditions that could impact our members include a virulent influenza season or epidemic or pandemic, newly emergent mosquito-borne illnesses, such as the Zika virus, the West Nile virus, or the Chikungunya virus, or new viruses such as COVID-19. In addition, federal and state law enforcement officials have issued warnings in the past, and may do so in the future, about potential terrorist activity involving biological or other weapons of mass destruction.

All of these conditions, and others, could have a significant impact on the health of the population of wide-spread areas. We seek to ensure our premiums appropriately account for anticipated changes in utilization, including seasonal items, such as the flu. However, if any of the regions or states in which we operate were to experience a large-scale natural disaster, a viral epidemic or pandemic, a significant terrorism attack, or some other large-scale event affecting the health of a large number of our members, utilization rates and our covered medical expenses in such regions or states would rise, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations. Additionally, such natural disasters, epidemics, or pandemics could lead to regulatory changes which may force us to cover health care costs for members for which we would not typically be responsible. For example, states experiencing pandemics or natural disasters such as wildfires and hurricanes may promulgate emergency regulations requiring insurers to relax prior authorization requirements, remove prescription drug refill limitations, and cover out-of-network care.

36

Table of Contents

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic could significantly increase our costs of operation due to unanticipated changes in law or regulation, population morbidity, or utilization behaviors, adversely impact our operational effectiveness, and heighten the risks we face in our business, including those discussed in this prospectus.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, was identified in Wuhan, China.

Since then, SARS-CoV-2, and the resulting disease, COVID-19, has spread rapidly to almost every country in the world and all 50 states within the United States. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve and the impact of COVID-19, and the actions taken to contain its spread or address its impact, could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.

We seek to ensure our direct policy premiums appropriately account for anticipated changes in utilization. However, our ability to do so accurately is limited by the changing nature of COVID-19 infection rates, the mutation of the COVID-19-causing virus into more infectious strains, the uncertain time frame to widespread availability and adoption of COVID-19 vaccines, the effectiveness of those vaccines against novel virus strains, and the evolving clinical understanding of COVID-19’s post-acute, long-term impacts on health. Governmental authorities have recommended, and in certain cases, required, that elective or other medical appointments be suspended or canceled to avoid non-essential patient exposure to medical environments and potential infection. We have experienced depressed non-COVID-19 related medical costs and, as the pandemic continues to affect the United States and as our members continue to change the way the utilize care, this trend may continue. Some of these costs will likely be incurred at a later date, resulting in increased medical claims expenses in the future. Additionally, as a result of those measures, we may be unable to fully implement clinical initiatives to manage health care costs and chronic conditions of our members and appropriately document their health risks and diagnoses to substantiate payments we may be entitled to under federal and state risk adjustment programs. The reduced demand for certain routine and non-critical medical services has also created financial stress for certain of our providers and could result in providers leaving our network, the insolvency of such providers, increased provider payment disputes, and less favorable payment terms from providers.

Additionally, the long-term health impacts of SARS-CoV-2 infection causing COVID-19 are not yet well known or understood. If a large-scale COVID-19 outbreak resulted in a significant number of our members needing unanticipated ongoing post-acute care, such as regular physical, occupational, or respiratory therapy, additional pharmaceutical intervention, or care for increased frequency of other illness resulting from a COVID-19-weakened immune system, our business could be materially adversely impacted due to an unanticipated increase in covered medical expenses.

State and federal governments have promulgated regulatory changes requiring us to relax premium collection practices, and cover health care costs for members for which we would not typically be responsible. For example, the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (the FFCRA), as amended by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act), requires member health care expenses incurred during a visit to evaluate the need for or obtain COVID-19 diagnostic testing to be borne entirely by us. Certain states, such as New York and New Jersey, require us to cover all costs of members’ receipt of medical care via telemedicine from any in-network provider. New large-scale COVID-19 outbreaks may result in additional regulation in our states of operation, which could limit our ability to collect unpaid premiums. In addition, we have expanded benefit coverage in areas such as COVID-19 care and testing, telemedicine, and pharmacy benefits; offered additional enrollment opportunities to those who previously declined employer-sponsored offerings; extended certain premium payment terms for customers experiencing financial hardship; simplified administrative practices; and accelerated payments to care providers, all with the aim of assisting our customers, providers and members in addressing the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Such measures and any further steps taken by us, could adversely impact our financial results.

37

Table of Contents

The spread and impact of COVID-19, or actions taken to mitigate this spread, could also have a material and adverse effect on our ability to operate effectively, including as a result of the complete or partial closure of facilities or labor shortages. Disruptions in public and private infrastructure, including communications, availability of in-person sales and marketing channels, financial services and supply chains, could materially and adversely disrupt our normal business operations. We have transitioned most of our employee population to a remote work environment in an effort to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, as have a number of our third-party service providers, which may exacerbate certain risks to our business, including increased risk of phishing and other cybersecurity attacks, and increased risk of unauthorized dissemination of sensitive personal information or proprietary or confidential information about us or our members or other third-parties.

The outbreak of COVID-19 has also severely impacted global economic activity, which may adversely impact our members, partners and service providers, and caused significant volatility in the financial markets. These developments may adversely affect the timing of member premium or commercial service fee collections and corresponding payments, the ability of third parties to provide services to us, the value of our investment portfolio, and our access to capital.

We are continuing to monitor the spread of COVID-19, changes to our covered services, the ongoing costs and business impacts of dealing with COVID-19, including the potential costs and impacts associated with lifting, or reimposing restrictions on movement and economic activity and related risks. The extent of this impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted at this time, including, but not limited to, the transmission rate, introduction of new strains of COVID-19, duration and spread of the outbreak, its severity, the extent and effectiveness of the actions taken to contain the spread of the virus and address its impacts, including vaccine approval, effectiveness, availability and adoption, and how quickly and to what extent normal economic and operating conditions can resume. The ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, results of operations, financial position, and cash flows is uncertain as the pandemic continues to evolve globally, but such impacts could be material to our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

We utilize quota share reinsurance to reduce our capital and surplus requirements and protect against downside risk on the ceded claims. If regulators do not approve our reinsurance agreements for this purpose, or if we cannot negotiate renewals of our quota share arrangements on acceptable terms, or at all, enter into new agreements with reinsurers, or otherwise obtain capital through debt or equity financings, our capital position would be negatively impacted, and we could fall out of compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.

In 2020, we utilized quota share reinsurance arrangements with two other insurance companies, Axa France Vie and Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company, to reduce our capital and surplus requirements, which enables us to more efficiently deploy capital to finance our growth. In connection with our quota share reinsurance arrangements, which generally have terms of two or three years, reinsurers are entitled to a portion of our premiums, but also share financial responsibility for health care costs incurred by our members. All premiums and claims ceded under our quota share arrangements are shared proportionally with our reinsurers, up to a limit specified in each agreement, which varies from 100% to 105% of ceded premiums for the agreements applicable to the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020. These reinsurers have the unilateral right to extend certain of our arrangements if certain profitability limits are not met. Our decisions on claims payments are binding on the reinsurer with the exception of any payments by us that are not required to be made under the member’s policy. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020, approximately 55% and 77% of our business, respectively, was ceded under quota share reinsurance arrangements, with approximately 33% and 32% of our business, respectively, ceded to Axa France Vie and approximately

38

Table of Contents

22% and 45% of our business, respectively, ceded to Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company. We entered into statutory trust agreements with Axa France Vie in compliance with the credit for reinsurance laws and regulations of the state of domicile of each ceding company in connection with reinsurance ceded to an unauthorized reinsurer. Each trust account is funded at 102% of the ceding entity’s health care costs incurred but not yet reported, or IBNR. Acceptable assets deposited into the trust accounts include cash, certificates of deposit, and instruments that are acceptable to the commissioner of the insurance department of the ceding entity’s state of domicile.

Because reinsurers are entitled to a portion of our premiums under our quota share reinsurance arrangements, changes in the amount of business ceded under these arrangements directly impacts our net premium and net income estimates.

We also had XOL reinsurance arrangements for 2020 that covered claims on individuals in excess of $500,000, and anticipate entering into XOL reinsurance arrangements for 2021 to cover claims on individuals in excess of $750,000. We pay approximately 1% of premiums for this coverage to our reinsurer. The amount of business ceded under our reinsurance arrangements can vary significantly from year to year. Further, if our reinsurers consistently and successfully dispute our obligations to make a claim payment under a given policy, if we cannot renegotiate renewals of any of our quota share reinsurance arrangements (all of which are slated for negotiation in 2021) on acceptable terms, if we are unable to enter into such arrangements with additional reinsurers or, if such arrangements are not approved by any of our regulators (or if our regulators take a different view, whether prospectively or retroactively, with respect to the capital treatment of our reinsurance agreements), we may not have sufficient capital and surplus to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, and we would have to enter into a corrective action plan or cease operations in jurisdictions where we could not comply with such requirements.

These arrangements also subject us to various obligations, representations, and warranties with respect to the reinsurers. Reinsurance does not relieve us of liability as an insurer. We remain obligated to pay our members’ health care claims, even if a reinsurer defaults on obligations to us under the reinsurance arrangement. Although we regularly evaluate the financial condition of reinsurers to minimize exposure to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies, reinsurers may become financially unsound. If a reinsurer fails to meet its obligations under the reinsurance contract or if the liabilities exceed any applicable loss limit, we remain responsible for covering the claims on the reinsured policies.

We also rely on debt and equity to help fund subsidiary surplus requirements, as well as pay our operating expenses and capital expenditures or fund acquisitions. In the event we need access for such purposes, our ability to obtain such capital may be limited and it may come at significant cost.

We are subject to risks associated with outsourcing services and functions to third parties.

We contract with third-party vendors and service providers who provide services to us and our subsidiaries to help with our internal administrative functions, as well as third-party vendors and service providers who help us administer our products and plans. For example, CaremarkPCS Health provides certain prescription benefit management, disease management, and specialty pharmacy services with respect to our health plans. In New Jersey, we contract with QualCare, which provides us with access to its network, which represents a significant portion of our medical network in New Jersey, and various network management services. The partial or complete loss of a vendor or other third-party relationship could cause a material disruption to our business and make it difficult and costly to provide services and products that our regulators and members expect, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows, and results of operations.

39

Table of Contents

Some of these third-parties have direct access to our systems in order to provide their services to us and operate the majority of our communications, network, and computer hardware and software. For example, we currently offer our products through our website and online app using Amazon Web Services, Inc., or AWS, platforms for cloud computing, a provider of cloud infrastructure services, and the Google Cloud Platform, or GCP. Our operations depend on protecting the virtual cloud infrastructure hosted in AWS and GCP by maintaining its configuration, architecture, and interconnection specifications, as well as the information stored in these cloud platforms and which third-party internet service providers transmit. In the event that either our AWS or GCP service agreement is terminated, or there is a lapse of service, interruption of internet service provider connectivity, or damage to such facilities, we could experience interruptions in meeting key service obligations to our members and business partners, as well as delays and additional expense in arranging new facilities and services, which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Other third-parties that have access to our systems and member information, or provide services that help with our administrative functions include Atlassian Corporation Plc, or Atlassian, which provides a reporting and project management tool called Jira for certain of our health insurance subsidiaries to launch and track investigations, make changes to member information, and communicate efficiently with departments within Oscar, and inContact, Inc., or inContact, which provides cloud-based contact center software solutions that we use to engage with members. The Oscar platform also integrates various third-party applications, including Google LLC, or Google, Workplace applications, such as Gmail, Hangouts, Calendar, and Drive.

Our arrangements with third-party vendors and service providers may make our operations vulnerable if those third parties fail to satisfy their obligations to us, including their obligations to maintain and protect the security and confidentiality of our information and data, or the information and data relating to our members or customers. We are also at risk of a data security incident involving a vendor or third party, which could result in a breakdown of such third party’s data protection processes or cyber-attackers gaining access to our infrastructure through the third party. To the extent that a vendor or third party suffers a data security incident that compromises its operations, we could incur significant costs and possible service interruption. In addition, we may have disagreements with our third-party vendors or service providers regarding relative responsibilities for any such failures or incidents under applicable business associate agreements or other applicable outsourcing agreements. Any contractual remedies and/or indemnification obligations we may have for vendor or service provider failures or incidents may not be adequate to fully compensate us for any losses suffered as a result of any vendor’s failure to satisfy its obligations to us or under applicable law. Our vendor and service provider arrangements could be adversely impacted by changes in vendors’ or service providers’ operations or financial condition, or other matters outside of our control. Violations of, or noncompliance with, laws and/or regulations governing our business or noncompliance with contract terms by third-party vendors and service providers could increase our exposure to liability to our members, providers, or other third parties, or could result in sanctions and/or fines from the regulators that oversee our business. In turn, this could increase the costs associated with the operation of our business or have an adverse impact on our business and reputation. Moreover, if these vendor and service provider relationships were terminated for any reason, we may not be able to find alternative partners in a timely manner or on acceptable financial terms, and may incur significant costs and/or experience significant disruption to our operations in connection with any such vendor or service provider transition. As a result, we may not be able to meet the full demands of our members or customers and, in turn, our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be harmed. In addition, we may not fully realize the anticipated economic and other benefits from our outsourcing projects or other relationships we enter into with third-party vendors and service providers, as a result of unanticipated delays in transitioning our operations to the third-party vendor or service provider, such third-party vendor or service provider’s noncompliance with contract terms, unanticipated costs or

40

Table of Contents

expenses, or violations of laws and/or regulations, or otherwise. This could result in substantial costs or other operational or financial problems that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations.

Adverse market conditions may result in our investment portfolio suffering losses or reduce our ability to meet our financing needs, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations or liquidity.

We maintain a significant investment portfolio of cash equivalents and primarily short-term investments in a variety of securities, which are subject to general credit, liquidity, market, and interest rate risks and will decline in value if interest rates increase or one of the issuers’ credit ratings is reduced. As a result, we may experience a reduction in value or loss of our investments, which could have a materially adverse effect on our results of operations, liquidity, and financial condition.

In addition, during periods of increased volatility, adverse securities and credit markets may exert downward pressure on the availability of liquidity and credit capacity for certain issuers. We need liquidity to pay our operating expenses, make payments on our indebtedness and pay capital expenditures. The principal sources of our cash receipts are premiums, administrative fees, investment income, proceeds from borrowings and proceeds from the issuance of capital stock. Our access to additional financing will depend on a variety of factors such as market conditions, the general availability of credit, the volume of trading activities, the availability of credit to our industry, our credit ratings and credit capacity, as well as the possibility that customers or lenders could develop a negative perception of our long- or short-term financial prospects. Similarly, our access to funds may be impaired if regulatory authorities or rating agencies take negative actions against us. If one or a combination of these factors were to occur, our internal sources of liquidity may prove to be insufficient and, in such case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms, or at all.

If state regulators do not approve payments of dividends and distributions by our subsidiaries to us, we may not have sufficient funds to implement our business strategy.

As we operate as one or more holding companies and we principally generate revenue through our health insurance subsidiaries, we are regulated under state insurance holding company laws. Although most of our subsidiaries are not currently profitable, in the future, if they become profitable or if our current levels of reserves and capital become excessive, we may make requests for dividends and distributions from our subsidiaries to fund our operations. In addition to state corporate law limitations, these subsidiaries are subject to more stringent laws and regulations that may restrict the ability to pay or limit the amount of dividends and distributions that can be paid to us without prior approval of, or notification to, state regulators, including mandatory statutory capital and surplus requirements. As we become profitable, we may increasingly rely on distributions from our subsidiaries, and if regulators were to deny our subsidiaries’ requests to pay dividends, the funds available to us would be limited, which could harm our ability to implement our business strategy.

If we are unable to integrate and manage our information systems effectively, our operations could be disrupted.

Our operations depend significantly on effective information systems. The information gathered and processed by our information systems, assists us in, among other things, monitoring utilization and other cost factors, processing provider claims, and providing data to our regulators. Our health care providers also depend upon our information systems for membership verifications, claims status, and other information. We partner with third parties, including Amazon, Atlassian, inContact, and Google, to support our information technology systems. Our information systems and applications require

41

Table of Contents

continual maintenance, upgrading, and enhancement to meet our current and expected operational needs and regulatory requirements. If we underestimate the need to expand or experience difficulties with the transition to or from information systems or do not appropriately plan, integrate, maintain, enhance, or expand our information systems, we could suffer, among other things, operational disruptions, loss of existing members and difficulty in attracting new members, regulatory enforcement, and increases in administrative expenses. In addition, our ability to integrate and manage our information systems may be impaired as the result of events outside our control, including acts of nature, such as earthquakes or fires, or acts of terrorists. Also, we may from time to time obtain significant portions of our systems-related or other services or facilities from independent third parties, which may make our operations vulnerable if such third parties discontinue such services or fail to perform adequately.

From time to time, we may become involved in costly and time-consuming litigation and regulatory actions, which require significant attention from our management.

From time to time, we are a defendant in lawsuits and the subject of regulatory actions, and are subject to audits and investigations relating to our business, including, without limitation, claims by members alleging failure to pay for or authorize payment for health care, claims related to non-payment or insufficient payments for out-of-network services by providers, claims of trademark and other intellectual property infringement, claims alleging bad faith, inquiries regarding our submission of risk adjustment data, enforcement actions by state regulatory bodies alleging non-compliance with state law, and claims related to the imposition of new taxes, including, but not limited to, claims that may have retroactive application. We also may receive subpoenas and other requests for information from various federal and state agencies, regulatory authorities, state Attorneys General, committees, subcommittees, and members of the U.S. Congress and other state, federal, and international governmental authorities. Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation and regulatory proceedings, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of any such proceedings. An unfavorable outcome could have a material adverse impact on our business and financial position, results of operations, and/or cash flows, and may affect our reputation and brand. In addition, regardless of the outcome of any litigation or regulatory proceedings, investigations, audits, or reviews, responding to such matters is costly and time consuming, and requires significant attention from our management, and could, therefore, harm our business and financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Insurance may not cover such claims, may not provide sufficient payments to cover all of the costs to resolve one or more such claims, and may result in our having to pay significant fines, judgments, or settlements, which, if uninsured, or if the fines, judgments, and settlements exceed insured levels, could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows, thereby harming our business. See “Business—Legal Proceedings.”

The regulations and contractual requirements applicable to us and other market participants are complex and subject to change, making it necessary for us to invest significant resources in complying with our regulatory and contractual requirements. Ongoing vigorous legal enforcement and the highly technical regulatory scheme mean that our compliance efforts in this area will continue to require significant resources, and we may not always be successful in ensuring appropriate compliance by our Company, employees, consultants, or vendors, for whose compliance or lack thereof we may be held responsible and liable. Regulatory audits, investigations, and reviews could result in changes to our business practices, and also could result in significant or material premium refunds, fines, penalties, civil liabilities, criminal liabilities, or other sanctions, including marketing and enrollment sanctions, suspension or exclusion from participation in government programs, imposition of heightened monitoring by our federal or state regulators, and suspension or loss of licensure if we are determined to be in violation of applicable laws or regulations. Any of these audits, reviews, or investigations could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or business, or could result in significant liabilities and negative publicity for our Company.

42

Table of Contents

We rely on the experience and expertise of our Co-Founders, senior management team, highly-specialized technology and insurance experts, key technical employees, and other highly skilled personnel.

Our success depends upon the continued service of Mario Schlosser, our Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors, and Joshua Kushner, our Co-Founder, Vice Chairman and a member of our board of directors, the members of our senior management team, highly-specialized insurance experts, and key technical employees, as well as our ability to continue to attract and retain additional highly qualified personnel. Our future success depends on our continuing ability to identify, hire, develop, motivate, retain, and integrate highly skilled personnel for all areas of our business. If we are unable to attract the requisite personnel, our business, and prospects may be adversely affected. Each of our Co-Founders, members of our senior management team, specialized technology and insurance experts, key technical personnel, and other employees could terminate their relationship with us at any time. The loss of our Co-Founders or any other member of our senior management team, specialized technology and insurance experts, or key personnel might significantly delay or prevent the achievement of our strategic business objectives and could harm our business. In addition, much of our essential technology and infrastructure are custom-made for our business by our personnel. The loss of key technology personnel, including members of management, as well as our engineering and product development personnel, could disrupt our operations and harm our business. We also rely on a small number of highly-specialized insurance experts, the loss of any one of whom could have a disproportionate impact on our business. Competition in our industry for qualified employees is intense. Our compensation arrangements, such as our equity award programs, may not always be successful in attracting new employees, and retaining and motivating our existing employees. Moreover, if and when the stock options or other equity awards are substantially vested, employees under such equity arrangements may be more likely to leave, particularly when the underlying shares have seen a value appreciation.

We face significant competition for personnel, particularly in New York, where our headquarters is located. To attract top talent, we have to offer, and believe we will need to continue to offer, competitive compensation and benefits packages. We may also need to increase our employee compensation levels in response to competitor actions. If we are unable to hire new employees quickly enough to meet our needs, or otherwise fail to effectively manage our hiring needs or successfully integrate new hires, including our recently hired management team members, our efficiency, ability to meet forecasts and our employee morale, productivity, and retention could suffer, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

If we or our partners or other third parties with whom we collaborate sustain a cyber-attack or suffer privacy or data security breaches that disrupt our information systems or operations, or result in the dissemination of sensitive personal or confidential information, we could suffer increased costs, exposure to significant liability, adverse regulatory consequences, reputational harm, loss of business, and other serious negative consequences.

As part of our normal operations, we and our partners and other third parties with whom we collaborate routinely collect, process, store, and transmit large amounts of data, including PHI subject to HIPAA, as well as proprietary or confidential information relating to our business or third parties, including our members, providers, and vendors. Information security risks have generally increased in recent years because of the proliferation of new technologies and the increased sophistication and activities of perpetrators of cyber-attacks, as well as a result of an increase in work-from-home arrangements due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Hackers and data thieves are increasingly sophisticated and operating large-scale and complex automated attacks. As cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend additional resources to further enhance our information security measures, develop additional protocols and/or investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities.

43

Table of Contents

Our information technology systems and safety control systems are subject to a growing number of threats from computer programmers, hackers, and other adversaries that may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate our confidential information or that of third parties, create system disruptions, or cause damage, security issues, or shutdowns. They also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that attack our systems or otherwise exploit security vulnerabilities. Because the techniques used to circumvent, gain access to, or sabotage security systems, can be highly sophisticated and change frequently, they often are not recognized until launched against a target, and may originate from less regulated and remote areas around the world. We may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventive measures, resulting in potential data loss and damage to our systems. Our systems are also subject to compromise from internal threats such as improper action by employees, including malicious insiders, or by vendors, counterparties, and other third parties with otherwise legitimate access to our systems. Our policies, employee training (including phishing prevention training), procedures, and technical safeguards may not prevent all improper access to our network or proprietary or confidential information by employees, vendors, counterparties, or other third parties. Our facilities may also be vulnerable to security incidents or security attacks, acts of vandalism or theft, misplaced or lost data, human errors, or other similar events that could negatively affect our systems, and our and our members’, data. Additionally, our third-party service providers who process information on our behalf may cause security breaches for which we are responsible.

Moreover, we face the ongoing challenge of managing access controls in a complex environment. The process of enhancing our protective measures can itself create a risk of systems disruptions and security issues. Given the breadth of our operations and the increasing sophistication of cyber-attacks, a particular incident could occur and persist for an extended period of time before being detected. The extent of a particular cyber-attack and the steps that we may need to take to investigate the attack may take a significant amount of time before such an investigation could be completed and full and reliable information about the incident is known. During such time, the extent of any harm or how best to remediate it might not be known, which could further increase the risks, costs, and consequences of a data security incident. In addition, our systems must be routinely updated, patched, and upgraded to protect against known vulnerabilities. The volume of new software vulnerabilities has increased substantially, as has the importance of patches and other remedial measures. In addition to remediating newly identified vulnerabilities, previously identified vulnerabilities must also be updated. We are at risk that cyber-attackers exploit these known vulnerabilities before they have been addressed. The complexity of our systems and platforms, the increased frequency at which vendors are issuing security patches to their products, our need to test patches, and, in some instances, coordinate with third-parties before they can be deployed, all could further increase our risks.

Any compromise or perceived compromise of the security of our systems or the systems of one or more of our vendors or service providers could damage our reputation and brand, cause the termination of relationships with our members, result in disruption or interruption to our business operations, marketing partners and carriers, reduce demand for our services, and subject us to significant liability and expense, as well as regulatory action and lawsuits, which would harm our business, operating results, and financial condition. The CCPA, in particular, includes a private right of action for California consumers whose CCPA-covered personal information is impacted by a data security incident resulting from a company’s failure to maintain reasonable security procedures and, hence, may result in civil litigation in the event of a data breach impacting such information. Although we maintain insurance covering certain security and privacy damages and claim expenses, we may not carry insurance or maintain coverage sufficient to compensate for all liability and, in any event, insurance coverage would not address the reputational damage that could result from a security incident or any regulatory actions or litigation that may result. In addition, in the event that additional data security laws are implemented, we may not be able to timely comply with such requirements, or such requirements may not be compatible with our current processes.

44

Table of Contents

Real or perceived errors, failures or bugs in our systems, website, or app could impair our operations, damage our reputation and brand, and harm our business and operating results.

Our continued success is dependent on our systems, applications, and software continuing to operate and to meet the changing needs of our members and users. We rely on our technology and engineering staff and vendors to successfully implement changes to, and maintain, our systems and services in an efficient and secure manner. Like all information systems and technology, our website and online app may contain material errors, failures, vulnerabilities, or bugs, particularly when new features or capabilities are released, any of which could lead to interruptions, delays, or website or online app shutdowns, or could cause loss of critical data, or the unauthorized disclosure, access, acquisition, alteration or use of personal or other confidential information.

A significant impact on the performance, reliability, security, and availability of our systems, software, or services may harm our reputation and brand, impair our ability to operate, retain existing members, or attract new members, and expose us to legal claims and government action, each of which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, and growth prospects.

We may not be able to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards, or NOLs, to offset future taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, which could adversely affect our cash flows.

As of December 31, 2020, we had federal income tax NOLs of $1.05 billion available to offset our future taxable income, if any, prior to consideration of annual limitations that may be imposed under Section 382 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, or otherwise. Of our NOLs, approximately $792.1 million of losses will expire between 2032 and 2039, and $253.9 million of losses can be carried forward indefinitely.

We may be unable to use our NOLs, as we do not have a history of positive earnings. In addition, under Section 382 of the Code, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change” (very generally defined as a greater than 50% change, by value, in the corporation’s equity ownership by certain shareholders or groups of shareholders over a rolling three-year period), the corporation’s ability to use its pre-ownership change NOLs to offset its post-ownership change income may be limited. We completed an analysis under Section 382, and determined that our NOLs are subject to limitations based on changes in ownership that occurred in 2016, and we may experience ownership changes in the future as a result of subsequent shifts in our stock ownership, including this offering, some of which may be outside of our control. If we undergo another ownership change, we may incur additional limitations on our ability to utilize our NOLs existing at the time of the ownership change prior to their expiration. Future regulatory changes could also limit our ability to utilize our NOLs. To the extent we are not able to offset future taxable income with our NOLs, our cash flows may be adversely affected.

Failure to secure, protect, or enforce our intellectual property rights could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Our commercial success is dependent in part on protecting our core technologies, intellectual property assets, and proprietary rights (such as source code, information, data, processes, and other forms of information, know-how, and technology). We rely on a combination of copyrights, trademarks, service marks, trade secret laws, and contractual restrictions to establish and protect our intellectual property. However, there are steps that we have not yet taken to protect our intellectual property on a global basis. For example, we do not have any patents, which limits our ability to deter patent infringement claims by competitors and other third parties who may hold or obtain patents. Additionally, the steps that we have already taken to protect our intellectual property may not be sufficient or

45

Table of Contents

effective, and our confidentiality, non-disclosure, or invention assignment agreements with employees, consultants, partners, or other parties may be breached and may otherwise not be effective in establishing our rights in intellectual property and in controlling access to our proprietary information. Even if we do detect violations, we may need to engage in litigation to enforce our rights.

We currently hold various domain names relating to our brand, including HiOscar.com. We also engage a third-party vendor to monitor fictitious sites that may purport to be us. Failure to protect our domain names could adversely affect our reputation and brand, and make it more difficult for users to find our website and our online app. We may be unable, without significant cost or at all, to prevent third parties from diverting traffic from or acquiring domain names that are similar to, infringe upon, or otherwise decrease the value of our trademarks and other proprietary rights.

While we take precautions designed to protect our intellectual property, it may still be possible for competitors and other unauthorized third parties to copy our technology and use our proprietary brand, content, and information to create or enhance competing solutions and products, which could adversely affect our competitive position in our rapidly evolving and highly competitive industry. Some license provisions that protect against unauthorized use, copying, decompiling, transfer, and disclosure of our technology may be unenforceable under the laws of certain jurisdictions and foreign countries, and the remedies for such events may not be sufficient to compensate for such breaches. We enter into confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees and consultants, and enter into confidentiality agreements with our third-party providers and strategic partners. We cannot assure you that these agreements will be effective in controlling access to, and use and distribution of, our platform and proprietary information. Further, these agreements do not prevent our competitors from independently developing technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to our offerings. Such arrangements may limit our ability to protect, maintain, enforce, or commercialize such intellectual property rights. If we are unable to prevent the unauthorized use or exploitation of our intellectual property, the value of our brand, content, and other intangible assets may be diminished, competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our service and methods of operations, the perception of our business and service to members, and potential members, may become confused, and our ability to attract customers may be adversely affected. Any inability or failure to protect our intellectual property could adversely impact our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We have filed, and may continue in the future to file, applications to protect certain of our innovations and intellectual property. We do not know whether any of our applications will result in the issuance of a patent, trademark, or copyright, as applicable, or whether the examination process will require us to narrow our claims. In addition, we may not receive competitive advantages from the rights granted under our intellectual property. Our existing intellectual property, and any intellectual property granted to us, or that we otherwise acquire in the future, may be contested, circumvented, or invalidated, and we may not be able to detect or prevent third parties from infringing our rights to our intellectual property. Therefore, the exact effect of the protection of this intellectual property cannot be predicted with certainty. In addition, given the costs, effort, and risks of obtaining patent protection, including the requirement to ultimately disclose the invention to the public, we may choose not to seek patent protection for certain innovations. Any failure to adequately obtain such patent protection, or other intellectual property protection, could later prove to adversely impact our business.

We may be required to spend significant resources in order to monitor, protect, and defend our intellectual property rights, and some violations may be difficult or impossible to detect. Litigation to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights could be costly, time-consuming, and distracting to management, and could result in the impairment or loss of portions of our intellectual property. Our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims, and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property rights. Our inability to protect our proprietary technology against unauthorized copying or use, as well as any costly litigation

46

Table of Contents

or diversion of our management’s attention and resources, could impair the functionality of our platform, delay introductions of enhancements to our platform, result in our substituting inferior or more costly technologies into our platform, or harm our reputation or brand. In addition, we may be required to license additional technology from third parties to develop and market new offerings or platform features, which may not be on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and could adversely affect our ability to compete or require us to rebrand or otherwise modify our offerings, which could further exhaust our resources. Furthermore, we may also be obligated to indemnify our members or business partners in connection with any such litigation and to obtain licenses.

Risks Related to our Indebtedness

Our debt obligations contain restrictions that impact our business and expose us to risks that could materially adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.

As of December 31, 2020, on a pro forma basis, after giving effect to the application of the net proceeds of this offering as described in “Use of Proceeds,” we would have had outstanding indebtedness of approximately $                . We may incur additional indebtedness in the future, including borrowings under the New Revolving Credit Facility, which we plan to enter into as described in “Prospectus Summary—Recent Developments—New Revolving Credit Facility.” Our indebtedness could have significant effects on our business, such as:

In addition, we may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow from our operations to repay our indebtedness when it becomes due and to meet our other cash needs. If we are not able to pay our borrowings as they become due, we will be required to pursue one or more alternative strategies, such as selling assets, refinancing or restructuring our indebtedness or selling additional debt or equity securities. We may not be able to refinance our debt or sell additional debt or equity securities or our assets on favorable terms, if at all, and if we must sell our assets, it may negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, we may be subject to prepayment penalties depending on when we repay our indebtedness, which amounts could be material.

47

Table of Contents

Restrictions imposed by our Term Loan Facility may materially limit our ability to operate our business and finance our future operations or capital needs.

The terms of our Term Loan Facility, which we intend to repay in full using the proceeds of this offering, may restrict us and our restricted subsidiaries from engaging in specified types of transactions. We expect our New Revolving Credit Facility to have similar terms. These covenants, subject to certain limitations and exceptions, restrict our ability, and that of our subsidiaries, to, among other things:

A breach of any of these covenants, or any other covenant in the documents governing our Term Loan Facility, could result in a default or event of default under our Term Loan Facility. We anticipate the Revolving Credit Facility will also include defaults or events of defaults for, among other things, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, certain cross-defaults and cross-accelerations to other indebtedness, certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency, certain judgments and changes of control. In the event of any event of default under our Term Loan Facility, the applicable lenders or agents could elect to terminate borrowing commitments and declare all borrowings and loans outstanding thereunder, together with accrued and unpaid interest and any fees and other obligations, to be immediately due and payable. In addition, or in the alternative, the applicable lenders or agents could exercise their rights under the security documents entered into in connection with our Term Loan Facility. We have pledged substantially all of our assets as collateral securing our Term Loan Facility and any such exercise of remedies on any material portion of such collateral would likely materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.

If we were unable to repay or otherwise refinance these borrowings and loans when due, and the applicable lenders proceeded against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness, we may be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation. In the event the applicable lenders accelerate the repayment of our borrowings, we may not have sufficient assets to repay that indebtedness. Any acceleration of amounts due under our Term Loan Facility or other outstanding indebtedness would also likely have a material adverse effect on us.

Pursuant to our Credit Agreement, we are required to comply with certain financial covenants to maintain a minimum dollar threshold of gross premiums (as defined in the Credit Agreement), a minimum combined ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and minimum liquidity (as defined in the Credit Agreement) as further described in “Description of Certain Indebtedness.” Our ability to borrow under our Credit Agreement depends on our compliance with these financial covenants. We expect will have to comply with certain financial covenants in the New Revolving Credit Facility as well. Events beyond our control, including changes in general economic and business conditions, may affect our ability to satisfy the financial covenants. We cannot assure you that we will satisfy the financial covenants in the future, or that our lenders will waive any failure to satisfy the financial covenants.

48

Table of Contents

Changes in the method pursuant to which the London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, is determined and the transition to other benchmarks may adversely affect our results of operations.

LIBOR and certain other “benchmarks” have been the subject of continuing national, international, and other regulatory guidance and proposals for reform. These reforms may cause such benchmarks to perform differently than in the past or have other consequences which cannot be predicted. In July 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates LIBOR, publicly announced that it intends to stop persuading or compelling banks to submit LIBOR rates after 2021. To identify a successor rate for U.S. dollar LIBOR, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee or ARRC, a U.S. based group convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, was formed. The ARRC is comprised of a diverse set of private sector entities and a wide array of official-sector entities, banking regulators, and other financial sector regulators. The ARRC has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, as its preferred alternative rate for LIBOR. SOFR is a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight, collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities, and is based on directly observable U.S. Treasury-backed repurchase transactions. Financial regulators in the United Kingdom, the European Union, Japan, and Switzerland also have formed working groups with the aim of recommending alternatives to LIBOR denominated in their local currencies. Although SOFR appears to be the preferred replacement rate for U.S. dollar LIBOR, it is unclear if other benchmarks may emerge or if other rates will be adopted outside of the United States.

The Term Loan Facility has interest rate payments determined directly or indirectly based on LIBOR. We also expect that our New Revolving Credit Facility to have interest rate payments determined directly or indirectly based on LIBOR. Uncertainty regarding the continued use and reliability of LIBOR as a benchmark interest rate could adversely affect the performance of LIBOR relative to its historic values. The Term Loan Facility contains “hardwired” benchmark replacement provisions with “early opt-in” triggers that permit the replacement of LIBOR prior to the phasing out of published LIBOR rates. The benchmark replacement language contemplates the use of an alternative benchmark rate to be selected by the Administrative Agent, which may include Term SOFR. Even if financial instruments are transitioned to alternative benchmarks, such as SOFR, successfully, the new benchmarks are likely to differ from LIBOR, and our interest expense associated with our outstanding indebtedness or any future indebtedness we incur may increase. Further, transitioning to an alternative benchmark rate, such as SOFR, may result in us incurring significant expense and legal risks, as renegotiation and changes to documentation may be required in effecting the transition. Any alternative benchmark rate may be calculated differently than LIBOR and may increase the interest expense associated with our existing or future indebtedness.

Any of these occurrences could materially and adversely affect our borrowing costs, financial condition, and results of operations.

Risks Related to this Offering and Ownership of Our Class A Common Stock

Our management team will have immediate and broad discretion over the use of the net proceeds from this offering and may not use them effectively.

The principal purposes of this offering are to increase our capitalization and financial flexibility and create a public market for our Class A common stock. We expect to use approximately $             million of the net proceeds of this offering to repay in full outstanding borrowings, including fees and expenses, under our Term Loan Facility and the remainder of such net proceeds for general corporate purposes, including to fund our growth (including capital contributions to our health insurance subsidiaries), technology development, working capital, operating expenses, and capital expenditures. Additionally, we may use a portion of the net proceeds to acquire or invest in products, services, or technologies; however, we do not have agreements or commitments for any material investments at

49

Table of Contents

this time. See “Use of Proceeds.” As of the date of this prospectus, other than repayment of indebtedness under our Term Loan Facility, we do not have a specific plan for the net proceeds to us from this offering and, accordingly, we are not able to allocate the net proceeds among any of these potential uses in light of the variety of factors that will impact how such net proceeds are ultimately utilized by us. Our management will have broad discretion in the application of the net proceeds. Our stockholders may not agree with the manner in which our management chooses to allocate the net proceeds from this offering. The failure by our management to apply these funds effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operation. Pending their use, we may invest the net proceeds from this offering in a manner that does not produce income. The decisions made by our management may not result in positive returns on your investment and you will not have an opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial, or other information upon which our management bases its decisions.

Our Class A common stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the initial public offering price.

Prior to this offering, there has not been a public trading market for shares of our Class A common stock. It is possible that after this offering an active trading market will not develop or continue or, if developed, that any market will be sustained, which could make it difficult for you to sell your shares of Class A common stock at an attractive price or at all. The initial public offering price of our Class A common stock will be determined by negotiations between us and the representatives of the underwriters based upon a number of factors and may not be indicative of prices that will prevail in the open market following the consummation of this offering. See “Underwriting.” Consequently, you may not be able to sell shares of our Class A common stock at prices equal to or greater than the price you paid in this offering.

Many factors, some of which are outside our control, may cause the market price of our Class A common stock to fluctuate significantly, including those described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section and this prospectus, as well as the following:

50

Table of Contents

As a result, volatility in the market price of our Class A common stock may prevent investors from being able to sell their Class A common stock at or above the initial public offering price, or at all. These broad market and industry factors may materially reduce the market price of our Class A common stock, regardless of our operating performance. In addition, price volatility may be greater if the public float and trading volume of our Class A common stock is low. As a result, you may suffer a loss on your investment.

The dual class structure of our common stock will have the effect of concentrating voting control with Thrive Capital and our Co-Founders for the foreseeable future, which will limit the ability of our other investors to influence corporate matters, including the election of directors and the approval of any change of control transaction.

Upon completion of this offering, our Class B common stock will have 20 votes per share, and our Class A common stock will have one vote per share. Following this offering, and without giving effect to any purchases that may be made through our directed share program or otherwise in this offering, the holders of our outstanding Class B common stock, which consist of Thrive Capital and our Co-Founders, will beneficially own     % of our outstanding capital stock and hold     % of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock (or     % and     %, respectively, if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares of our Class A common stock in full). Thrive Capital and Joshua Kushner (as the sole managing member of the Thrive General Partners), in particular, will beneficially own     % of our outstanding capital stock and hold     % of the voting power of our outstanding capital stock immediately following this offering (or     % and     %, respectively, if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares of our Class A common stock in full). Because of the 20-to-one voting ratio between our Class B common stock and Class A common stock, the holders of Class B common stock, in particular Thrive Capital and Joshua Kushner (as the sole managing member of the Thrive General Partners), collectively will control over a majority of the combined voting power of all of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock and therefore will be able to control all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval until a significant portion of such shares of outstanding Class B common stock have been converted to shares of Class A common stock as further described in “Description of Capital Stock.” This concentrated control will limit or preclude the ability of our other investors to influence corporate matters for the foreseeable future. For example, Thrive Capital and our Co-Founders will have sufficient voting power to determine the outcome with respect to elections of directors, amendments to our certificate of incorporation, amendments to our bylaws that are subject to a shareholder vote, increases to the number of shares available for issuance under our equity incentive plans or adoption of new equity incentive plans, and approval of any merger, consolidation, sale of all or substantially all of our assets or other major corporate transaction requiring stockholder approval for the foreseeable future. In addition, this concentrated control may also prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our capital stock that you may feel are in your best interest as one of our stockholders. This control may also adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

51

Table of Contents

Because Thrive Capital’s and our Co-Founders’ interests may differ from those of our other stockholders, actions that Thrive Capital and our Co-Founders take with respect to us, as significant stockholders, may not be favorable to our other stockholders, including holders of our Class A common stock.

Thrive Capital and its affiliates engage in a broad spectrum of activities. In the ordinary course of its business activities, Thrive Capital and its affiliates may engage in activities where their interests conflict with our interests or those of our other stockholders. Thrive Capital or one of its affiliates may also pursue acquisition opportunities that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us. In addition, Thrive Capital may have an interest in us pursuing acquisitions, divestitures and other transactions that, in its judgment, could enhance its investment, even though such transactions might involve risks to you. See “Description of

Capital Stock—Corporate Opportunities.”

Future transfers by holders of Class B common stock will generally result in those shares converting to Class A common stock, subject to limited exceptions. As among the individual holders of Class B common stock, the conversion of Class B common stock to Class A common stock will have the effect, over time, of increasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class B common stock who retain their shares in the long term (and decreasing the relative voting power of those holders of Class B common stock who transfer their shares). See “Description of Capital Stock—Anti-Takeover Provisions” for additional information.

We cannot predict the effect our dual class structure may have on the market of our Class A common stock.

We cannot predict whether our dual class structure will result in a lower or more volatile market price of our Class A common stock, in adverse publicity, or in other adverse consequences. For example, certain index providers, such as S&P Dow Jones, have announced restrictions on including companies with multiple-class share structures in certain of their indices, including the S&P 500. Accordingly, our dual class share structure would make us ineligible for inclusion in certain indices and, as a result, mutual funds, exchange-traded funds, and other investment vehicles that attempt to passively track those indices may not invest in our Class A common stock. These policies are relatively new and it is unclear what effect, if any, they will have on the valuations of publicly-traded companies excluded from such indices, but it is possible that they may depress valuations, as compared to similar companies that are included. Because of the dual class structure of our common stock, we will likely be excluded from certain indices and we cannot assure that other stock indices will not take similar actions. Given the sustained flow of investment funds into passive strategies that seek to track certain indices, exclusion from certain stock indices would likely preclude investment by many of these funds and could make our Class A common stock less attractive to other investors. As a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could be adversely affected.

We will be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the rules of NYSE and, as a result, will qualify for, and intend to rely on, exemptions from certain corporate governance requirements. You will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to such requirements.

Upon completion of this offering, Thrive Capital and Joshua Kushner (as the sole managing member of the Thrive General Partners) will control approximately     % of the combined voting power of our outstanding capital stock (or     % if the underwriters exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full). As a result, we will be a “controlled company” within the meaning of the corporate

52

Table of Contents

governance standards of the NYSE. Under these rules, a listed company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a “controlled company” and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including:

Following this offering, we do not intend to rely on these exemptions, except for the exemption from the requirement that our nominating and corporate governance committee be composed entirely of independent directors. However, as long as we remain a “controlled company,” we may elect in the future to take advantage of any of these other exemptions. As a result of any such election, our board of directors may not have a majority of independent directors, our compensation committee may not consist entirely of independent directors, and our directors may not be nominated or selected by independent directors. Accordingly, you will not have the same protections afforded to stockholders of companies that are subject to all of the corporate governance requirements of the NYSE.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our Class A common stock for the foreseeable future.

We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. As a result, we do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our Class A common stock in the foreseeable future. Any decision to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to applicable laws, and will depend on, among other things, our business prospects, results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements and availability, industry trends, and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. Any such decision also will be subject to compliance with contractual restrictions and covenants in the agreements governing our current indebtedness. In addition, our ability to pay dividends in the future depends on the earnings and distributions of funds from our health insurance subsidiaries. Applicable state insurance laws restrict the ability of such health insurance subsidiaries to declare stockholder dividends and require our health insurance subsidiaries to maintain specified levels of statutory capital and surplus. We expect our New Revolving Credit Facility will contain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends. Moreover, we may incur additional indebtedness, the terms of which may further restrict or prevent us from paying dividends on our Class A common stock. As a result, you may have to sell some or all of your Class A common stock after price appreciation in order to generate cash flow from your investment, which you may not be able to do. Our inability or decision not to pay dividends could also adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.

We may issue shares of preferred stock in the future, which could make it difficult for another company to acquire us or could otherwise adversely affect holders of our Class A common stock, which could depress the price of our Class A common stock.

Our Amended Charter will authorize us to issue one or more series of preferred stock. Our board of directors will have the authority to determine the powers, designations, preferences, and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, and the qualifications, limitations, or restrictions thereof, of the shares of preferred stock and to fix the number of shares constituting any series, without any further vote or action by our stockholders. Our preferred stock could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend, and other rights superior to the rights of our Class A common stock. The potential issuance of

53

Table of Contents

preferred stock may delay or prevent a change in control of us, discouraging bids for our Class A common stock at a premium to the market price, and may materially and adversely affect the market price and the voting and other rights of the holders of our Class A common stock.

Future sales and issuances of our Class A common stock or rights to purchase our Class A common stock, including pursuant to our equity incentive plans, or other equity securities or securities convertible into our Class A common stock, could result in additional dilution of the percentage ownership of our stockholders and could cause the stock price of our Class A common stock to decline.

In connection with this offering, we intend to file a registration statement with the SEC on Form S-8 providing for the registration of shares of our Class A common stock issued or reserved for issuance under the 2012 Plan, 2021 Plan, and ESPP. Subject to the satisfaction of vesting conditions and the expiration of lock-up agreements, shares issued pursuant to or registered under the registration statement on Form S-8 will be available for resale immediately in the public market without restriction. From time to time in the future, we may also issue additional shares of our Class A common stock, Class B common stock or securities convertible into Class A common stock pursuant to a variety of transactions, including acquisitions. The issuance by us of additional shares of our Class A common stock or securities convertible into our Class A common stock would dilute your ownership of us, and the sale of a significant amount of such shares in the public market could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our Class A common stock.

Future sales, or the perception of future sales, by us or our existing stockholders in the public market following this offering could cause the market price for our Class A common stock to decline.

The sale of substantial amounts of shares of our Class A common stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could harm the prevailing market price of shares of our Class A common stock. These sales, or the possibility that these sales may occur, also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we deem appropriate. Upon completion of this offering, based on the shares outstanding as of December 31, 2020, we will have a total of                  shares of our Class A common stock outstanding (or                  shares if the underwriters exercise their over-allotment option in full) and                  shares of Class B common stock outstanding.

All of the shares of Class A common stock sold in this offering will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, except that any shares held by our affiliates,

as that term is defined under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, or Rule 144, may be sold only in compliance with the limitations described in “Shares Eligible for Future Sale.” The remaining outstanding shares of Class A common stock held by our existing owners after this offering will be subject to certain restrictions on resale.

We, our executive officers, directors, and the holders of substantially all of our outstanding stock will sign lock-up agreements with the underwriters that will, subject to certain exceptions, restrict the sale of the shares of our Class A common stock and certain other securities held by them until the earlier of 180 days following the date of this prospectus and the opening of trading on the second trading day immediately following our public release of earnings for the second quarter following the most recent period for which financial statements are included in this prospectus, as further described in “Shares Eligible for Future Sale.” Notwithstanding the foregoing, as further described in the section titled “Shares Eligible for Future Sale,” (A) up to              million shares of our Class A common stock and securities directly or indirectly convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our Class A common stock held by Employee Stockholders (as defined in the section titled “Shares Eligible for

54

Table of Contents

Future Sale”) may be sold for a 7-trading day period beginning at the commencement of trading on the first trading day on which our Class A common stock is traded on the NYSE, and (B) up to              million shares of our outstanding Class A common stock and securities directly or indirectly convertible into or exchangeable or exercisable for our Class A common stock held by Employee Stockholders, plus any shares eligible for sale during the window described in clause (A) above that were not previously sold, may be sold beginning at the opening of trading on the second trading day immediately following our public release of earnings for the first quarter following the most recent period for which financial statements are included in this prospectus, provided that the closing price of our Class A common stock on NYSE is at least 33% greater than the initial public offering price per share set forth on the cover page of this prospectus for the periods described in the section titled “Underwriting.”

Upon the expiration of the lock-up agreements described above, all such shares will be eligible for resale in the public market, subject, in the case of shares held by our affiliates, to volume, manner of sale, and other limitations described in “Shares Eligible for Future Sale.” Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC may, in its sole discretion and at any time without notice, release all or any portion of the shares or securities subject to any such lock-up agreements. See “Underwriting” for a description of these lock-up agreements.

As restrictions on resale end, the market price of our shares of Class A common stock could drop significantly if the holders of such restricted shares sell them or are perceived by the market as intending to sell them. These factors could also make it more difficult for us to raise additional funds through future offerings of our shares of Class A common stock or other securities.

The JOBS Act will allow us to postpone the date by which we must comply with certain laws and regulations intended to protect investors, and to reduce the amount of information we provide in our reports filed with the SEC. We cannot be certain if this reduced disclosure will make our Class A common stock less attractive to investors.

The JOBS Act is intended to reduce the regulatory burden on “emerging growth companies.” As defined in the JOBS Act, a public company whose initial public offering of common equity securities occurs after December 8, 2011, and whose annual net revenues are less than $1.07 billion will, in general, qualify as an “emerging growth company” until the earliest of:

Under this definition, we will be an “emerging growth company” upon completion of this offering and could remain an “emerging growth company” until as late as the fifth anniversary of the completion of this offering. For so long as we are an “emerging growth company,” we will, among other things:

55

Table of Contents

In addition, Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can use the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This permits an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to use this extended transition period and, as a result, our consolidated financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of issuers who are required to comply with the effective dates for new or revised accounting standards that are applicable to public companies. We cannot predict if investors will find our Class A common stock less attractive as a result of our decision to take advantage of some or all of the reduced disclosure requirements above. If some investors find our Class A common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Class A common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.

The obligations associated with being a public company require significant resources and management attention, and we have and will continue to incur increased costs as a result of becoming a public company.

After completion of this offering, as a public company, we will face increased legal, accounting, administrative, and other costs and expenses that we did not incur as a private company, and which have not been reflected in our historical consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus. We have already started to incur, and expect to continue to incur, significant costs related to operating as a public company. Upon the completion of this offering, we will be subject to the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations implemented by the SEC, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the PCAOB, and the rules and standards of the NYSE, each of which imposes additional reporting and other obligations on public companies. As a public company, we will be required to, among others:

56

Table of Contents

These rules and regulations and changes in laws, regulations, and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, which have created uncertainty for public companies, have and will continue to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time consuming and costly. These laws, regulations, and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Our investment in compliance with existing and evolving regulatory requirements has and will continue to result in increased administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In addition, the need to establish the corporate infrastructure demanded of a public company may also divert management’s attention from implementing our business strategy, which could prevent us from improving our business, financial condition, and results of operations. If we do not continue to develop and implement the right processes and tools to manage our changing enterprise and maintain our culture, our ability to compete successfully and achieve our business objectives could be impaired, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, we cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur to comply with these requirements. We anticipate that these costs will materially increase our general and administrative expenses.

We also expect that being a public company and complying with applicable rules and regulations will make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage, or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified people to serve on our board of directors, our board committees, or as executive officers.

As a public reporting company, we will be subject to rules and regulations established from time to time by the SEC regarding our internal control over financial reporting. If we fail to establish and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results, or report them in a timely manner.

Upon consummation of this offering, we will become a public reporting company subject to the rules and regulations established from time to time by the SEC and the NYSE. These rules and regulations will require, among other things, that we establish and periodically evaluate procedures with respect to our internal control over financial reporting. Reporting obligations as a public company are likely to place a considerable strain on our financial and management systems, processes, and controls, as well as on our personnel.

In addition, as a public company, we will be required to document and test our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act so that our management can certify as to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404(a), requires that, beginning with our second annual report following our initial public offering, management assess and report annually on the effectiveness of our

57

Table of Contents

internal control over financial reporting, and identify any material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. Although Section 404(b) requires our independent registered public accounting firm to issue an annual report that addresses the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we have opted to rely on the exemptions provided in the JOBS Act and, consequently, will not be required to comply with SEC rules that implement Section 404(b) until such time as we are no longer treated as an “emerging growth company.” We could potentially qualify as an “emerging growth company” until as late as the fifth anniversary of the completion of this offering.

If our senior management is unable to conclude that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, or to certify the effectiveness of such controls, and our independent registered public accounting firm cannot render an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at such time as it is required to do so, and material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting are identified, we could be subject to regulatory scrutiny, a loss of public and investor confidence, and to litigation from investors and stockholders, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and our stock price. In addition, if we do not maintain adequate financial and management personnel, processes, and controls, we may not be able to manage our business effectively or accurately report our financial performance on a timely basis, which could cause a decline in our Class A common stock price and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Failure to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could potentially subject us to sanctions or investigations by the SEC, the exchange upon which our securities are listed or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.

Anti-takeover provisions in our governing documents and under Delaware law could make an acquisition of our company more difficult, limit attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current management, and depress the market price of our Class A common stock.

Our Amended Charter, Amended Bylaws, and Delaware law contain, or will contain, provisions that could have the effect of rendering more difficult, delaying or preventing an acquisition deemed undesirable by our board of directors. Among others, our Amended Charter and Amended Bylaws will include the following provisions:

58

Table of Contents

These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in our management. As a Delaware corporation, we are also subject to provisions of Delaware law, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, which prevents interested stockholders, such as certain stockholders holding more than 15% of our outstanding common stock from engaging in certain business combinations for a period of 3 years following the time that such stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless (i) prior to the time such stockholder became an interested stockholder, the board approved the transaction that resulted in such stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, (ii) upon consummation of the transaction that resulted in such stockholder becoming an interested stockholder, the interested stockholder owned 85% of the voting stock of the Company outstanding at the time the transaction commenced (excluding certain shares) or (iii) following board approval, the business combination receives the approval of the holders of at least two-thirds of our outstanding common stock not owned by such interested stockholder.

The insurance laws in most states requires regulatory review and approval of a change in control of our domestic insurers. “Control” generally means the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct, or cause the direction of, the management and policies of an insurer, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract, or otherwise. The state statutes usually presume that control exists if a person or company, directly or indirectly, owns, controls, or holds with the power to vote ten percent (10%) or more of the voting securities of an insurer or a parent company, but some states may presume control at a lower percentage. This presumption can then be rebutted by a showing that control does not exist. Accordingly, a change in control could trigger regulatory review and approval in one or more states in which we operate.

Any provision of our Amended Charter, Amended Bylaws, Delaware law, or applicable state insurance law that has the effect of delaying, preventing, or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our Class A common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our Class A common stock.

Our Amended Charter will provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for substantially all disputes between us and our stockholders, and federal district courts will be the sole and exclusive forum for Securities Act claims, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers, or employees.

Our Amended Charter will provide that, unless we consent to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware is the sole and exclusive forum for: (a) any derivative action, suit, or proceeding brought on our behalf; (b) any action, suit, or proceeding asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our current or former directors, officers or other employees or stockholders to us or to our stockholders, creditors, or other constituents; (c) any action, suit, or proceeding asserting a claim arising pursuant to the DGCL, our Amended Charter or Amended Bylaws, or as to which the DGCL confers exclusive jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware; or (d) any action, suit, or proceeding asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine; provided that the exclusive forum provisions will not apply to suits brought to enforce any liability or duty created by the Exchange Act, or to any claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction.

Our Amended Charter will further provide that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts are the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. We note that investors cannot waive

59

Table of Contents

compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. The choice of forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our current or former directors, officers, or other employees or stockholders, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our current or former directors, officers, and other employees or stockholders. Alternatively, if a court were to find the choice of forum provisions contained in our Amended Charter to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

An active trading market for our Class A common stock may never develop or be sustained.

Although we intend to apply to have our Class A common stock listed on the NYSE, an active trading market for our Class A common stock may not develop on that exchange or elsewhere or, if developed, that market may not be sustained. If an active trading market for our Class A common stock does not develop or is not maintained, the liquidity of our Class A common stock, your ability to sell your shares of our Class A common stock when desired, and the prices that you may obtain for your shares of Class A common stock will be adversely affected.

If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our company, or if they issue unfavorable commentary about us or our industry or downgrade our Class A common stock, the price of our Class A common stock could decline.

The trading market for our Class A common stock will depend in part on the research and reports that third-party securities analysts publish about our company and our industry. We may be unable to attract research coverage, and if one or more analysts cease coverage of our company, we could lose visibility in the market. In addition, one or more of these analysts could downgrade our Class A common stock or issue other negative commentary about our company or our industry. As a result of one or more of these factors, the trading price of our Class A common stock could decline.

If our operating and financial performance in any given period does not meet the guidance that we provide to the public, the market price of our Class A common stock may decline.

We may, but are not obligated to, provide public guidance on our expected operating and financial results for future periods. Any such guidance will be comprised of forward-looking statements subject to the risks and uncertainties described in this prospectus, and in our other public filings and public statements. Our actual results may not always be in line with or exceed any guidance we have provided, especially in times of economic uncertainty. If, in the future, our operating or financial results for a particular period do not meet any guidance we provide or the expectations of investment analysts, or if we reduce our guidance for future periods, the market price of our Class A common stock may decline. Even if we do issue public guidance, there can be no assurance that we will continue to do so in the future.

Investors in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $        per share.

Based on an assumed initial public offering price of $        per share (the midpoint of the range set forth on the cover of this prospectus), purchasers of our Class A common stock in this offering will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $        per share in the as adjusted net tangible book value per share of Class A common stock from the initial public offering price, and our as adjusted net tangible book value as of December 31, 2020 after giving effect to this offering would be $        per share. This dilution is due in large part to earlier investors having paid substantially less than the initial public offering price when they purchased their shares. See “Dilution.”

60

Table of Contents