UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☒ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |
☒ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
☐ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
☐ | Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
American Express Company
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
☒ | No fee required |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials |
☐ | Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11 |
March 18, 2022 |
Items of Business
To vote on the following proposals:
![]() |
Election of directors proposed by our Board of Directors for a term of one year, as set forth in this proxy statement
| |||
![]() |
Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022
| |||
![]() |
Advisory resolution to approve executive compensation
| |||
![]() |
One shareholder proposal, if properly presented at the meeting
| |||
![]() |
Such other business that may properly come before the meeting
|
ADMISSION
We do not require tickets for admission to the meeting but do limit attendance to shareholders as of the record date or their proxy holders. Please bring proof of your common share ownership, such as a current brokerage statement, and photo identification.
If you are attending the meeting, you will be asked to comply with the special precautions we are taking in light of COVID-19, as described in this proxy statement. Detailed information regarding our 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, including how to cast your vote, can be found in Other Information starting on page 84 of this proxy statement.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE 2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 3, 2022:
Our proxy statement and annual report are available online at http://ir.americanexpress.com*. We will mail to certain shareholders a notice of internet availability of proxy materials, which contains instructions on how to access these materials and vote online. We expect to mail this notice and to begin mailing our proxy materials on or about March 18, 2022.
Your vote is important to us. Please exercise your shareholder right to vote.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
Kristina V. Fink
Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer
* | Web links throughout this document are provided for convenience only. Information from the American Express website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement. |
WHEN
Tuesday, May 3, 2022
9:00 a.m. Eastern Time
WHERE
American Express Company
200 Vesey Street
New York, New York 10285
RECORD DATE
March 7, 2022
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This proxy statement contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to risks and uncertainties. You can identify forward-looking statements by words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, aim, will, may, should, could, would, likely, estimate, predict, potential, continue or other similar expressions. Actual results may differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including those contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 and the Companys other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT i
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 1 | |
Our Companys Strategic Imperatives
American Express is a globally integrated payments company that provides customers with access to products, insights and experiences that enrich lives and build business success. Our integrated payments platform includes card-issuing, merchant-acquiring and card network businesses. We are a leader in providing payments products and services to a broad range of customers, including consumers, small businesses, mid-sized companies and large corporations around the world. Following an unprecedented year in 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2021 we focused on rebuilding our growth momentum by investing in our customers, brand and talent and making progress against our four long-term strategic imperatives:
Business Performance
Our key focus in 2021 was to rebuild our growth momentum while continuing to invest in initiatives that advance our long-term strategic imperatives. Business performance highlights in 2021 include:
◾ | Maintained customer satisfaction scores and card retention rates above pre-pandemic (2019) levels; |
◾ | Added 9.7 million new proprietary cards; |
◾ | Grew worldwide network volumes(1) by 24% versus the prior year, surpassing 2019 levels, with growth driven by consumer and small and mid-sized business spending; |
◾ | Sustained virtual parity coverage in the U.S., with approximately 99% of credit-card accepting merchants able to accept American Express(2), and remained committed to growing coverage globally, adding over 7 million merchant locations outside of the U.S.; and |
◾ | Continued to invest in marketing, value propositions, technology, and colleagues, while retaining financial flexibility. |
(1) | Represents the total of billed business on our proprietary cards and processed network volumes, including alternative payment solutions facilitated by AXP. |
(2) | Source: AXP internal data and The Nilson Report, February 2022. |
Financial Results
2021 financial highlights include:
◾ | Delivered $42.4 billion in revenue; |
◾ | Total revenue for the year grew by 17% versus the prior year, reflecting momentum in Card Member spending and growth in card fees as Card Member acquisition increased and retention remained high; |
◾ | Credit metrics remained around historic lows throughout the year; |
◾ | Diluted earnings per share (EPS) for the full year 2021 were $10.02, up from $3.77 the prior year, reflecting momentum in core business performance, credit reserve releases due to continued strong credit performance and an improving macroeconomic outlook, and sizeable net gains on equity investments; and |
◾ | Return on equity (ROE) was 33.7% and we returned $9 billion of capital to our shareholders through both share repurchases and dividends. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 2 | |
Financial Performance Highlights
(1) | Attributable to common shareholders. Represents net income less earnings allocated to participating share awards, dividends on preferred shares and other items. |
(2) | Return on equity (ROE) is calculated by dividing the preceding twelve months of net income by the one-year monthly average of total shareholders equity. |
How Our Compensation Program Supports Our Business Strategy
Our executive compensation program is designed to support the longevity and stability of the Company by driving long-term business outcomes, promoting strong governance practices and encouraging responsible risk-taking. This is achieved by linking individual pay with the Companys performance on a diverse set of measures as well as financial and strategic goals. All senior executives have a large portion of compensation that is variable and covers annual and multi-year performance periods. Long-Term Incentive Awards are designed to align executives with the Companys long-term performance using performance-based equity awards in the form of Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options. Further, the Company Scorecard incentivizes performance and includes key objectives in four categories: Shareholder, Customer, Colleague and Strategic.
In 2021, the Compensation and Benefits Committee modified its charter to include reviewing strategies relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives as well as key talent metrics. In addition, executive compensation is also increasingly linked to our ESG goals. For example, in years past, the annual scorecards Colleague category included diversity representation, talent retention, culture and inclusion metrics as part of the calculation to determine incentive compensation for all eligible colleagues and in 2021, we also incorporated key ESG initiatives into our executive compensation program under the Strategic category of our Company Scorecard.
To support strong oversight, our Boards Compensation and Benefits Committee approves performance goals across our categories and certifies performance outcomes.
Our executive compensation program, including compensation principles and strategy, is discussed in detail under the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 3 | |
Our Board of Directors
The following provides current summary information about each director nominee. Our director nominees possess a range of diverse skills, backgrounds, experience and viewpoints that we believe are integral to an effective and well-functioning board. Detailed information about each nominees qualifications, experience, skills and expertise along with select professional and community contributions can be found starting on page 7.
Our Director Nominees
Name | Position | Age | Director Since | AC | CB | NGPR | R | |||||||
Thomas J. Baltimore |
Director | 58 | 2021 | ∎ |
|
|
| |||||||
Charlene Barshefsky |
Director | 71 | 2001 |
|
|
|
∎ | |||||||
John J. Brennan |
Lead Independent Director | 67 | 2017 | ∎ | ● |
|
| |||||||
Peter Chernin |
Director | 70 | 2006 |
|
∎ | ● |
| |||||||
Ralph de la Vega |
Director | 70 | 2016 | ● | ∎ |
|
| |||||||
Michael O. Leavitt |
Director | 71 | 2015 | ∎ |
|
∎ |
| |||||||
Theodore J. Leonsis |
Director | 66 | 2010 |
|
∎ | ∎ |
| |||||||
Karen L. Parkhill |
Director | 56 | 2020 | ∎ |
|
|
● | |||||||
Charles E. Phillips |
Director | 62 | 2020 |
|
|
|
∎ | |||||||
Lynn A. Pike |
Director | 65 | 2020 |
|
∎ |
|
| |||||||
Stephen J. Squeri |
CEO & Chairman | 63 | 2018 |
|
|
|
| |||||||
Daniel L. Vasella |
Director | 68 | 2012 |
|
∎ | ∎ |
| |||||||
Lisa W. Wardell |
Director | 52 | 2021 |
|
|
|
∎ | |||||||
Christopher D. Young |
Director | 50 | 2018 |
|
|
∎ | ∎ |
∎ Member ● Chair
AC | Audit and Compliance | CB | Compensation and Benefits | NGPR | Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility | R | Risk |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 4 | |
Director Nominee Demographics
(1) | Based on self-identified characteristics. |
Director Experience Highlights
Our director nominees have a diversity of skills, viewpoints and expertise, including in the following areas:
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 5 | |
Corporate Governance Highlights
|
BOARD STRUCTURE AND INDEPENDENCE |
◾ Engaged and autonomous Lead Independent Director with explicit duties and responsibilities
◾ All directors are independent
◾ Diverse and highly skilled Board that provides a range of viewpoints
|
◾ Annual Review of optimal Board leadership structure for the Company
◾ Executive sessions of the independent directors led by the Lead Independent Director at each regular in-person Board meeting without management present
|
◾ Executive sessions at committee meetings led by independent committee chairs without management present |
![]() |
|
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS |
|
◾ Proxy access rights
◾ Annual election of all directors |
◾ Majority voting for directors |
◾ Shareholders representing at least 25% of outstanding shares are able to call special meetings
|
|
|
|
BOARD OVERSIGHT |
|
◾ Oversees the Companys annual business plan and corporate strategy, succession planning and risk management
◾ Monitors the Companys workplace culture, tone at the top and values
◾ Proactive, comprehensive and strategic Board and senior management succession planning
◾ Annual dedicated Board meeting focused on Company strategy
|
◾ Key management and rising talent reviewed at an annual talent review
◾ Director access to experts and advisors, both internal and external
◾ The Audit and Compliance Committee oversees the integrity of the Companys financial statements and legal and regulatory compliance
◾ The Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee oversees Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) matters
|
◾ The Compensation and Benefits Committee oversees the Companys strategies relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives as well as key talent metrics
◾ Risk-aware culture overseen by the Risk Committee, which also oversees cybersecurity and ESG risks
|
|
|
|
STRONG CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES |
|
◾ Prohibition
of hedging and
◾ Sound
policy on public company
◾ Responsive, active and ongoing shareholder engagement
◾ Strategic succession planning resulting in regular Board and committee refreshment with a range of tenures
|
◾ Robust
Code of Business Conduct for
◾ Annual written Board and committee performance evaluations
◾ Comprehensive clawback policy for senior executives
◾ Robust annual risk assessment of executive compensation programs, policies and practices |
◾ Significant share ownership requirements for senior executives and directors
◾ Mandatory retirement age of 72
◾ Strong commitment to ESG, including net-zero carbon emissions by 2035
|
|
| |||||
◾ Wide-ranging and comprehensive director onboarding program along with robust continuing educational programs
|
For a detailed discussion of our corporate governance framework and our director nominees, please see Corporate Governance at American Express beginning on page 6.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 6 |
Corporate Governance at American Express
Item 1: Election of Directors for a Term of One Year
Our Board currently has 15 members. Fourteen of our directors are standing for re-election to hold office until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders or until their successors are duly elected and qualified. One of our current directors, Ronald A. Williams, is retiring and not standing for re-election. For more information, please see Our Retiring Director on page 14. Our Board has appointed Laureen E. Seeger, Richard Starr and Kristina V. Fink as proxies to vote your shares on your behalf. The proxies intend to vote for the election of each of the 14 candidates nominated by the Board unless you indicate otherwise on your proxy or voting instruction form or when you vote by telephone or online. Each candidate has consented to being named in this proxy statement and serving as a director, if elected. However, if any nominee is not able to serve, the Board can either nominate a different person or reduce the size of the Board. If the Board nominates another individual, the persons named as proxies may vote for that nominee.
Our director nominees hold and have held senior positions as leaders of various large, complex businesses and organizations and in government, demonstrating their ability to develop and execute significant policy and operational objectives at the highest levels. Our nominees include current and former chief executive officers, chief financial officers, chief operating officers and members of senior management of large, global businesses. Through these roles, our nominees have developed expertise in core business strategy, operations, finance, human capital management and leadership development, compliance, controls and risk management, as well as the skills to respond to rapidly evolving business environments and foster innovation and business transformation. Additionally, our nominees experience serving in government and on other public, private and non-profit boards bring valuable knowledge and expertise, including in the areas of public policy, ESG, succession planning, compensation, cybersecurity, financial reporting and regulatory compliance.
Detailed biographical information for each director nominee follows. We have included career highlights, other public directorships and select professional and community contributions along with the top qualifications, experience, skills and expertise that we believe each director brings to our Board. Our Board considered all of the aforementioned attributes and the results of our annual board evaluations when deciding to re-nominate the following directors.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 7 |
|
Thomas J. Baltimore
|
Director since 2021 | Independent | Age 58 Committee: Audit and Compliance |
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Chairman and CEO of Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (2016-present), an NYSE-listed lodging real estate investment trust (REIT) focused on upper-upscale and luxury hotel assets with 60 assets owned in the U.S.
◾ Former President, CEO and Director of RLJ Lodging Trust (2011-2016), an NYSE-listed lodging REIT focused on premium branded hotels in the U.S.
Specific Qualifications, Experience, ◾ Public company CEO ◾ Hospitality and real estate industry expert ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Financial accounting expertise ◾ Public company governance |
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc. ◾ Prudential Financial Inc.
Other Public Directorships in the Past Five Years ◾ AutoNation ◾ Duke Realty Corporation ◾ RLJ Lodging Trust
Select Professional and Community Contributions ◾ Executive Committee Member, American Hotel & Lodging Association ◾ Director, University of Virginia Investment Management Company ◾ Executive Board Member, National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ◾ Director, The Real Estate Roundtable |
|
Charlene Barshefsky
|
Director since 2001 | Independent | Age 71 Committee: Risk |
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Former Senior International Partner at WilmerHale (2001-2021), where she advised U.S. and international companies on international business transactions, government relations, market access, and foreign government regulation of business and investments
◾ Former U.S. Trade Representative and member of President Clintons Cabinet, where she served as chief trade negotiator and principal trade policymaker for the United States, negotiating complex market access, regulatory and investment agreements with virtually every major country in the world |
Specific Qualifications, Experience, ◾ High-level government service ◾ Expertise negotiating with foreign governments ◾ Advisor to firms on doing business in international markets ◾ Broad legal and public policy experience ◾ Public company governance
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ The Estée Lauder Companies Inc. ◾ Stagwell Inc. (fka MDC Partners Inc.)
Other Public Directorships in the Past Five Years ◾ Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. ◾ Intel Corporation
Select Professional and Community Contributions ◾ Trustee, Howard Hughes Medical Institute ◾ Member, Council on Foreign Relations |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 8 |
|
John J. Brennan
|
Director since 2017 | Lead Independent Director | Age 67 Committees: Audit and Compliance | Compensation and Benefits (Chair)
|
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Chairman Emeritus and Senior Advisor of The Vanguard Group, Inc. (2010-present), a global investment management company
◾ Former CEO, CFO and Chairman of the Board of The Vanguard Group, Inc.
◾ Former Chairman of the Board of Governors of The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), a U.S. financial services industry regulator
◾ Former Chairman of the Financial Accounting Foundation, an overseer of financial accounting and reporting standard-setting boards |
Specific Qualifications, Experience, ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ CFO and financial accounting expertise ◾ Risk and audit oversight ◾ Financial industry operations and regulation ◾ Institutional investor perspective
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ None
Other Public Directorships in the Past Five Years ◾ General Electric Company ◾ LPL Financial Holdings, Inc.
Select Professional and Community Contributions ◾ Chairman, Board of Trustees of the University of Notre Dame ◾ Chairman, Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program ◾ Founding Trustee, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology |
|
Peter Chernin
|
Director since 2006 | Independent | Age 70 Committees: Compensation and Benefits | Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility (Chair)
|
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Founder and CEO of Chernin Entertainment (2009-present), a film and television production company, and The Chernin Group, LLC, which focuses on strategic opportunities in media, technology and entertainment
◾ Co-Founder and Partner of TCG, a multi-stage investment firm dedicated to building consumer businesses
◾ Former President, Chief Operating Officer and director of News Corporation
◾ Former Chairman and CEO of the Fox Group, where he oversaw the global operations of the companys film, television, satellite cable and digital media businesses |
Specific Qualifications, Experience, ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Experience building global media businesses ◾ Digital business development ◾ Brand and marketing expertise ◾ Public company governance
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ None
Other Public Directorships in the Past ◾ Pandora Media, Inc. ◾ Twitter, Inc.
Select Professional and Community Contributions ◾ Co-Chairman and Co-Founder, Malaria No More ◾ Director and Co-chair, Board of Visitors of the University of California, Berkeley ◾ Former Director, Harvard AIDS Initiative |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 9 |
|
Ralph de la Vega
|
Director since 2016 | Independent | Age 70 Committees: Audit and Compliance (Chair) | Compensation and Benefits
|
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Chairman of the De la Vega Group (2018-present)
◾ Former Vice Chairman of AT&T Inc. and CEO of Business Solutions and International (2016), where he led AT&Ts Integrated Business Solutions group (both mobile and IP services), which served nearly all of the Fortune 1000 firms globally, AT&Ts Mexican wireless business and DIRECTV Latin America
◾ Former President and CEO of AT&T Mobile and Business Solutions (2014-2016)
◾ Former CEO of AT&T Mobility
◾ Former Chief Operating Officer of Cingular Wireless
Specific Qualifications, Experience,
Skills ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Global business leader ◾ Extensive business experience in Latin America ◾ Digital and mobile technology expertise ◾ Financial accounting expertise |
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ Amdocs Ltd.
Other Public Directorships in the
Past ◾ None
Select Professional and Community ◾ Former Chairman and Current Director, Junior Achievement Worldwide ◾ Director, Latino Donor Collaborative ◾ Former Executive Board Member, Boy Scouts of America |
|
Michael O. Leavitt
|
Director since 2015 | Independent | Age 71 Committees: Audit and Compliance | Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility
|
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Founder and Chairman of Leavitt Partners, LLC (2009-present), a health care consulting firm, and Chairman of Leavitt Equity Partners, a private equity fund
◾ Former U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services
◾ Former Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
◾ Former Governor of Utah
Specific Qualifications, Experience, Skills ◾ Extensive government experience ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Broad public policy experience ◾ Regulatory experience ◾ Public company governance |
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Other Public Directorships in the
Past ◾ HealthEquity, Inc. ◾ Medtronic, Inc.
Select Professional and Community ◾ Board of Advisors, Center for Presidential Transition, Washington D.C. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 10 |
|
Theodore J. Leonsis
|
Director since 2010 | Independent | Age 66 Committees: Compensation and Benefits | Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility
|
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Founder, Chairman and CEO of Monumental Sports & Entertainment, LLC (2010-present), a sports, entertainment, media and technology company that owns the NBAs Washington Wizards, NHLs Washington Capitals, the WNBAs Washington Mystics, the Capital City Go-Go, Wizards District Gaming, Caps Gaming and the Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C.
◾ Former Vice Chairman Emeritus of AOL LLC, a leading global ad-supported web company
◾ Former Chairman of Revolution Money, Inc., acquired by American Express in January 2010
Specific Qualifications, Experience, Skills ◾ Successful innovator and entrepreneur ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Expertise in social media and digital trends ◾ Brand and marketing expertise ◾ Public company governance |
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ Groupon, Inc.
Other Public Directorships in the
Past ◾ None
Select Professional and Community ◾ Chairman, D.C. College Access Program, Inc. ◾ Co-Founder and Vice-Chair, Greater Washington Partnership ◾ Co-Founder and Co-Executive Chairman, aXiomatic Gaming ◾ Council Member, National Museum of African American History and Culture |
|
Karen L. Parkhill
|
Director since 2020 | Independent | Age 56 Committees: Audit and Compliance | Risk (Chair)
|
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Medtronic, Inc. (2016-present), where she leads the global finance organization and key supporting functions including Treasury, Controller, Tax, Internal Audit, Investor Relations, Business Development, Information Technology and Enterprise Business Services
◾ Former Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of Comerica Inc. (2011-2016), where she directly managed the Finance department overseeing Accounting, Business Finance, Corporate Planning and Development, Investor Relations, Treasury and Economics, with responsibility for all financial reporting
◾ Former Chief Financial Officer of the Commercial Banking business at JP Morgan Chase and Co.
Specific Qualifications, Experience, Skills ◾ Public company CFO ◾ Financial accounting expertise ◾ Banking industry expertise ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Risk and audit oversight |
Other Current Public Directorships ◾None
Other Public Directorships in the
Past ◾ Comerica Inc.
Select Professional and Community ◾ Former Member, International Womens Forum ◾ Former National Trustee, Boys and Girls Clubs of America ◾ Former Director, Methodist Health System |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 11 |
|
Charles E. Phillips
|
Director since 2020 | Independent | Age 62 Committee: Risk |
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Managing Partner and Co-Founder of Recognize (2020-present), a technology private equity firm
◾ Former Chairman and CEO of Infor, Inc. (2010-2020), an enterprise software application provider
◾ Former President of Oracle Corporation
Specific Qualifications, Experience,
Skills ◾ Technology industry expertise ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Financial services industry and investment expertise ◾ Risk oversight ◾ Regulatory experience |
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ Paramount Global
Other Public Directorships in the
Past ◾ BancoSantander SA
Select Professional and Community ◾ Former Director, Federal Reserve Bank of New York ◾ Director, Apollo Theater ◾ Director, Council on Foreign Relations
|
|
Lynn A. Pike
|
Director since 2020 | Independent | Age 65 Committee: Compensation and Benefits |
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Former President of Capital One Bank (2007-2012) and a former member of the Capital One Executive Committee
◾ Former President of Business Banking at Bank of America, as well as the former President of California for that corporation
Specific Qualifications, Experience, Skills ◾ Unique perspective as Co-Chair of the Board of Directors of American Express National Bank ◾ Banking industry expertise ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Payments and network industry expertise ◾ Regulatory experience |
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ Hiscox Ltd.
Other Public Directorships in the
Past ◾ None
Select Professional and Community ◾ Co-Chair, Board of Directors of American Express National Bank ◾ Director, Hiscox USA (HICI) ◾ Director, BankWork$ ◾ Director, California State University Channel Islands Foundation
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 12 |
|
Stephen J. Squeri
|
Director since 2018 | Chairman and CEO since 2018 | Age 63 Committees: None
|
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Chairman and CEO of American Express Company (2018 to present)
◾ Mr. Squeri has held many positions during his 36 years at American Express, including Vice Chairman, Group President of Global Corporate Services, Group President of Global Services and Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer
Specific Qualifications, Experience, Skills ◾ Unique perspective as Company CEO ◾ Global business leader ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Payments and network industry expertise ◾ Expertise in digital and mobile innovation |
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ None
Other Public Directorships in the
Past ◾ None
Select Professional and Community ◾ Chair, Business Roundtable Corporate Governance Committee ◾ Trustee, Valerie Fund ◾ Trustee, Manhattan College ◾ Member, Board of Governors of Monsignor McClancy Memorial High School |
|
Daniel L. Vasella
|
Director since 2012 | Independent | Age 68 Committees: Compensation and Benefits | Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility
|
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Honorary Chairman and former Chairman and CEO of Novartis AG (1996-2013), a company that engages in the research, development, manufacture and marketing of health care products worldwide
◾ Former CEO and Former Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President, Head of Worldwide Development and Head of Corporate Marketing at Sandoz Pharma Ltd.
◾ Chairman, Numab Therapeutics AG
Specific Qualifications, Experience, Skills ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Finance, investment and M&A experience ◾ Global business leader ◾ Led a highly regulated business ◾ Public company governance |
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ PepsiCo, Inc. ◾ SciClone Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Other Public Directorships in the
Past ◾ None
Select Professional and Community ◾ Foreign Honorary Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences ◾ Former Trustee, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace ◾ Former Member, International Business Leaders Advisory Council for the Mayor of Shanghai
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 13 |
|
Lisa W. Wardell
|
Director since 2021 | Age 52 Committee: Risk |
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Executive Chairman of Adtalem Global Education Inc. (2021-present), where she leads the board of directors and helps guide Adtalems mission and strategy, as well as representing Adtalem and interacting with key stakeholders to help advance Adtalems mission
◾ Former CEO and Chairman of Adtalem Global Education, Inc. (2016-2021), where she oversaw the strategic repositioning of Adtalems portfolio, successfully acquiring and integrating companies in Adtalems financial services vertical, and led turnarounds and divestitures of Adtalems non-core assets
◾ Former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer for The RLJ Companies (2004-2016), where she was responsible for managing The RLJ Companies portfolio, including strategic partnerships, mergers and acquisitions, business strategy, operations and finance
|
Specific Qualifications, Experience, ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Risk oversight ◾ Finance, investment and M&A experience ◾ Public company governance ◾ Experience building global education business
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ Adtalem Global Education Inc.
Other Public Directorships in the
Past ◾ Christopher and Banks, Inc. ◾ Lowes Companies, Inc. ◾ THINK450
Select Professional and Community ◾ Member, The Business Council ◾ Member, The Executive Leadership Council ◾ Member, CEO Action for Diversity and Inclusion |
|
Christopher D. Young
|
Director since 2018 | Independent | Age 50 Committees: Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility | Risk
|
||||
Career Highlights
◾ Executive Vice President Business Development, Strategy and Ventures of Microsoft Corp. (2020-present), responsible for developing Microsofts global business development strategies that drive growth across the company
◾ Former CEO of McAfee, LLC (2017-2020), one of the worlds leading independent cybersecurity companies
◾ Former Senior Vice President and General Manager at Intel Security Group (2014-2017), where he led the initiative to spin out McAfee
Specific Qualifications, Experience, Skills ◾ Cybersecurity expert ◾ Core business, operations and management ◾ Experience in national security and emergency preparedness ◾ Product development and marketing experience ◾ Risk oversight |
Other Current Public Directorships ◾ None
Other Public Directorships in the
Past ◾ Rapid7, Inc. ◾ Snap Inc.
Select Professional and Community ◾ Member, CISA Cybersecurity Advisory Committee ◾ Former Member, Presidents National Security Telecommunications Advisory Committee ◾ Former Director, Cyber Threat Alliance ◾ Former Member, Board of Trustees of Princeton University
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 14 |
Ronald A. Williams is retiring from our Board at the end of his current term and, therefore, will not stand for reelection at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. We thank Mr. Williams for his years of dedicated service and wish him continued success in the future.
As illustrated by the director biographies on the previous pages, our Board is made up of a diverse group of leaders with substantial experience in their respective fields. Our Board believes that the combination of the various skills, qualifications and experiences of the director nominees contributes to an effective and well-functioning Board and that, individually and as a whole, the director nominees possess the necessary qualifications to provide effective oversight and insightful strategic guidance.
We continually review our Boards composition to identify the skills needed for our Company both in the near term and into the future. Ongoing strategic board succession planning, along with our mandatory retirement age for directors, ensures that the Board continues to maintain an appropriate mix of objectivity, skills and experiences to provide fresh perspectives and effective oversight and guidance to management, while leveraging the institutional knowledge and historical perspective of our longer-tenured directors. Over the next few years, several of our current Board members will retire due to our mandatory retirement age. With this in mind, our Board has been actively engaged in succession planning and added two new members in 2021. We believe that increasing the size of our Board in the short term to allow for knowledge transfer and information sharing between our newer directors and our retiring directors will help ensure an orderly and effective Board succession process over the next few years.
Ideal Director Nominee Attributes
The Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee assesses potential candidates based on their history of achievement, the breadth of their business experiences, whether they bring specific skills or expertise in areas that the committee has identified as desired and whether they possess personal attributes and experiences that will contribute to the sound functioning of our Board.
Diversity is also a key consideration in our nomination and succession planning processes. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that the Board should be diverse, engaged and independent. When reviewing potential board nominees, the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee considers the holistic diversity of the Board, including gender, race, ethnicity, age, sexual orientation and nationality, and does not discriminate on any basis. Specifically, we seek individuals who:
◾ | have established records of significant accomplishment in leading global businesses and large, complex organizations |
◾ | have achieved prominence in their fields and possess skills or significant experience in areas of importance to our business strategy and expected future business needs |
◾ | possess integrity, independence, energy, forthrightness, strong analytical skills and the commitment to devote the necessary time and attention to the Companys affairs |
◾ | demonstrate they can constructively challenge and stimulate management and exercise sound judgment |
◾ | demonstrate a willingness to work as part of a team in an atmosphere of trust and candor and a commitment to represent the interests of all shareholders rather than those of a specific constituency |
◾ | will contribute to the diversity of skills, experience and backgrounds on our Board |
Process for Identifying and Adding New Directors
The Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee uses a professional search firm to help identify, evaluate and conduct due diligence on potential director candidates. Using a professional search firm supports the committee in conducting a broad search and looking at a diverse pool of potential candidates. The committee also maintains an ongoing list of potential candidates and considers recommendations made by the Boards independent directors.
In addition, the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee considers all shareholder recommendations for director candidates and applies the same standards in considering candidates submitted by shareholders as it does in evaluating all other candidates. Shareholders can recommend candidates by writing to the committee in care of the Companys Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer, whose contact information is on page 30. Shareholders who wish to submit nominees for election at an annual or special meeting of shareholders should follow the procedure described on page 87.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 15 |
The Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee identifies and adds new directors using the following process:
1 |
Collect Candidate Pool |
![]() |
Independent search firms |
![]() |
Independent director recommendations |
![]() |
Shareholder recommendations |
2 |
Holistic Candidate Review |
Potential candidates are comprehensively reviewed and the subject of rigorous discussion during Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee meetings and Board meetings.
The candidates that emerge from this process are interviewed by members of the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee and other Board members, including the Chairman and Lead Independent Director.
![]() |
During these meetings, directors assess candidates on the basis of their skills and experience, their personal attributes and their expected contribution to the diversity of skills, experiences and backgrounds on our Board. |
![]() |
Extensive due diligence is conducted by third parties, including soliciting feedback from other directors and applicable persons outside the Company. |
3 |
Recommendation to the Board |
![]() |
The Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee presents qualified candidates to the Board for review and approval. |
Seven New Independent Directors Added Since 2017
| ||
![]() |
Racial, ethnic and gender diversity
| |
![]() |
Current and former CEOs
Current and
| |
![]() |
Regulatory
| |
![]() |
Global business leaders
| |
![]() |
Investment and
| |
![]() |
Technology and cybersecurity expertise
| |
![]() |
Hospitality industry expertise
| |
![]() |
Financial services, banking and payments industry expertise |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 16 |
The Company maintains a comprehensive director onboarding program. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Companys director onboarding program was transitioned to a virtual experience to facilitate the seamless integration of new directors into their roles, all while maintaining consistency, integrity and efficiency within the Companys existing onboarding process. The Companys virtual director onboarding program includes all elements of the in-person experience and each onboarding session is individually tailored to take into account a directors prior experience and background. New processes were developed for the virtual environment to introduce new directors and facilitate integration on the Board.
Our Board continually seeks to improve its performance. Our Lead Independent Director has regular one-on-one discussions with our Board members and conveys their feedback on an ongoing basis to our Chairman. Separately, our Chairman, Chief Legal Officer, and Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer each routinely communicates with our Board members to obtain real-time feedback.
Our Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee oversees the formal annual evaluation process of the effectiveness of our Board and its standing committees. Conducting a robust annual evaluation process allows the Board to assess its performance and practices and identify areas for improvement. As part of the evaluation process, our Board analyzes and assesses the performance of both the Chairman and the Lead Independent Director, as well as the culture of the Board.
Our annual Board evaluations cover several areas, including the following:
![]() |
Board efficiency and overall effectiveness |
![]() |
Board and committee structure |
![]() |
Board and committee composition |
![]() |
Satisfaction with the performance of the Chairman |
![]() |
Satisfaction with the performance of the Lead Independent Director |
![]() |
Board member access to the Lead Independent Director, CEO and other members of senior management |
![]() |
Quality of Board discussions and balance between presentations and discussion |
![]() |
Quality and clarity of materials presented to directors |
![]() |
Board and committee information needs |
![]() |
Satisfaction with Board agendas and the frequency and format of meetings and time allocations |
![]() |
Areas where directors want to increase their focus |
![]() |
Board dynamics and culture |
![]() |
Board and committee access to experts and advisors |
![]() |
Satisfaction with the format of the evaluation |
Our Board plans to periodically engage an independent third-party evaluation firm as we have in the past to augment the Boards annual evaluation process.
We believe that this continuous feedback cycle, along with our formal annual evaluation process, contributes to the overall functioning and ongoing effectiveness of our Board.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 17 |
Below is a summary of our Board evaluation process: |
1 | ||||
Annual Board and Committee Evaluations
The process, including evaluation method, is reviewed annually by the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee.
Written questionnaires are used for the Board and each standing committee and are updated and tailored each year to address the significant processes that drive Board effectiveness. Each director completes a written questionnaire on an unattributed basis for the Board and for each committee on which they serve. The questionnaires include open-ended questions and space for candid commentary. |
2 | ||||
Summary of the Written Evaluations
Reports are produced summarizing the written questionnaires, which include all responses and highlight year-over-year trends.
All comments are unattributed, included verbatim and shared with the full Board and each applicable committee. |
3 | ||||
Board and Committee Review
The Chair of the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee leads a discussion of the written Board and committee evaluation results at the Board level. Separately, each committee chair leads a discussion of the applicable written committee evaluation at each committee meeting and reports on their discussions to the full Board.
Directors also deliver feedback to the Lead Independent Director and Chairman of the Board and suggest changes and areas for improvement. |
4 | ||||
Actions taken in response to the evaluation process over the years include:
◾ Streamlined Board committee structure and meeting cadence;
◾ Board meetings in international locations with Company site visits are under consideration when permitted by health and travel conditions;
◾ Director onboarding program was modified and enhanced;
◾ Management with varying degrees of seniority present to the Board and its committees;
◾ Information and materials regularly provided to directors continue to evolve to alleviate information overload and to enable directors to focus on the key data;
◾ Format of Board meetings has been altered to enable more time for director discussion with and without the CEO present;
◾ Number of informal meetings between directors and key executives has been increased;
◾ Increased time for informal director-only gatherings;
◾ Director education and presentations on emerging risk areas, corporate governance, industry disruptors and competitors; and
◾ Board members added with expertise in areas critical to the Companys business strategy and operations. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 18 |
Our Board Leadership Structure
We believe that strong independent leadership is essential for our Board to effectively perform its primary oversight functions. We also believe it is critically important for our Board to retain flexibility to determine its leadership structure based on the particular composition of the Board, the individuals serving in leadership positions, the needs and opportunities of the Company as they change over time and considerations such as continuity of leadership, sound succession planning and the additional factors described below.
The Board believes that a combined Chairman and CEO role allows the Company to effectively convey its business strategy and core values to shareholders, customers, colleagues, regulators and the public in a single, consistent voice. The Board also recognizes the necessity of having a strong Lead Independent Director with a clearly defined role and set of responsibilities (as detailed below) where there is a combined Chairman and CEO or where the Chairman is not independent. Their leadership is supplemented by engaged and expert committee chairs along with independent-minded, skilled and committed directors.
The Boards succession planning discussions surrounding the recent changes in the Lead Independent Director role included extensive discussions of the Boards leadership structure. Further, our Board and Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee recently completed its annual review of the Boards leadership structure and considered the insightful, effective and sound leadership provided by Mr. Brennan as well as the tangible benefits of having a Chairman and CEO with an operational focus and extensive company experience given the global and complex nature of our business. In addition, the review also considered how the Companys robust corporate governance practices combined with the Boards current leadership structure helps to ensure both clear, strategic alignment throughout the Company and independent oversight of management. Taking all of this into account, our Board continues to believe that our current structure, led by Messrs. Squeri and Brennan, allows the Board to focus on key strategic, policy and operational issues, provides critical and effective leadership (both internally and externally), and creates an environment in which the Board can work effectively and appropriately challenge management, all of which we believe will benefit the long-term interests of our shareholders.
Strong Lead Independent Director with Defined Role and Responsibilities
John J. Brennan was elected by the independent directors of our Board to serve as Lead Independent Director, effective September 26, 2021. Mr. Brennan succeeds Ronald A. Williams, who has reached our mandatory retirement age and will not stand for reelection at our annual meeting.
Mr. Brennan joined our Board in 2017. During his tenure as a Board member, Mr. Brennan has established strong and effective working relationships with his fellow directors and garnered their trust and respect. Furthermore, he has demonstrated strong leadership skills, independent thinking and a deep understanding of our business. In connection with his election to Lead Independent Director, Mr. Brennan rejoined our Compensation and Benefits Committee as Chair. He was the Chair of the Risk Committee up until his election and was succeeded in that role by Ms. Parkhill. He remains a member of the Audit and Compliance Committee.
Mr. Brennan was selected to serve as Lead Independent Director as a result of a vigorous vetting process led by the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee, which included extensive discussions of potential candidates with all members of the Board to seek input and reach alignment. These robust discussions took into account independent director tenures and committee membership histories along with a potential candidates willingness and capacity to serve as Lead Independent Director, understanding that the position entails significant responsibility. The Board recognizes that in circumstances like ours where the positions of Chairman and CEO are combined, a strong Lead Independent Director with a clearly defined role and set of responsibilities is paramount for constructive and effective leadership. Therefore, the position of Lead Independent Director at American Express comes with a clear mandate and significant authority and responsibilities that are detailed as follows in our Board-approved Corporate Governance Principles:
![]() |
Preside at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present, including the executive sessions of the independent directors, and apprise the Chairman of the issues considered and decisions reached at those sessions; |
![]() |
Call additional meetings of the independent directors as needed; |
![]() |
Lead the Board in putting forth its expectations for tone at the top; |
![]() |
Meet regularly with the Chairman and serve as a liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors; |
![]() |
Facilitate effective and candid communication to optimize Board performance; |
![]() |
Serve as the Chair of the Compensation and Benefits Committee; |
![]() |
Coordinate with the Chair of the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee (as needed) to recruit and interview qualified candidates for the Board; |
![]() |
Lead the annual evaluation of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and together with the Chair of the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee, the evaluation of the performance and effectiveness of the Board; |
![]() |
Advise the Chairman of the Boards informational needs, participate in the setting of Board meeting agendas, including requesting the inclusion of additional agenda items at his or her discretion, and review and approve the types of information sent to the Board; |
![]() |
Review and approve the schedule of Board meetings to ensure there is sufficient time for discussion of all agenda items; |
![]() |
Monitor and coordinate with the Chairman on appropriate governance issues and developments; |
![]() |
Be available as appropriate for consultation and direct communication with major shareholders; |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 19 |
![]() |
Advise and meet with the Chairs of each Committee of the Board as needed to assist with the fulfillment of each such Committee Chairs responsibilities to the Board; and |
![]() |
Consult with the Chair of the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee and the Board on succession planning and appointments for each Committee of the Board. |
In addition, all Board members are encouraged to propose the inclusion of additional Board agenda items that they deem necessary or appropriate in carrying out their duties. All Board members have direct access to the Chairman and to the Lead Independent Director.
Our Boards Primary Role and Responsibilities, Structure and Processes
Our Board bears the responsibility for the oversight of management on behalf of our shareholders in order to ensure long-term value creation. In that regard, the primary responsibilities of our Board include, but are not limited to (i) oversight of the Companys annual business plan and development of the Companys strategy, including strategic objectives for the Companys businesses, (ii) ongoing succession planning and talent management, including the review of the results of the Companys Annual Colleague Experience Survey and (iii) risk management, including the oversight of the development of the Companys risk appetite.
How our Board Oversees our Annual Business Plan and Corporate Strategy
Our Board is responsible for overseeing the development of the Companys strategy, which articulates the Companys strategic objectives for its businesses; helps establish and maintain an effective risk management structure and control function; and provides direction to senior management to determine which business opportunities to pursue. At the beginning of each year, our senior management presents our consolidated annual business plan to the Board, and the Board discusses the Companys results relative to the plan periodically throughout the year. The Board holds senior management accountable for effectively implementing the Companys strategy consistent with its risk appetite, while maintaining an effective risk management framework and system of internal controls. In 2021, in addition to continuing to analyze and oversee the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Companys strategy and performance throughout the year, our Board engaged in a virtual three-day meeting (in place of our in-person off-site meeting) to conduct a deep dive into the Companys strategic goals, timeline to achieve these goals and execution plans.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 20 |
How our Board Engages in Ongoing CEO and Key Executive Succession Planning
Our Board ensures that we have the right management talent to pursue our strategies successfully.
The entire Board is involved in the critical aspects of the CEO succession planning process, including establishing selection criteria that reflect our business strategies, identifying and evaluating potential internal candidates and making key management succession decisions. Succession and development plans are regularly discussed with the CEO as well as without the CEO present in executive sessions of the Board. The Board makes sure that it has adequate opportunities to meet with and assess development plans for potential CEO and senior management successors to address identified gaps in skills and attributes. This occurs through various means, including informal meetings, Board dinners, presentations to the Board and committees, attendance at Board meetings and the comprehensive annual talent review. In addition, the Board has developed an emergency CEO succession plan.
The Board also oversees managements succession planning for other key executive positions. Our Board calendar includes at least one meeting each year at which the Board conducts a detailed talent review, which includes a review of the Companys talent strategies, leadership pipeline and succession plans for key executive positions.
Additionally, the detailed results of the Companys Annual Colleague Experience Survey are reviewed each year with the Board. Our Annual Colleague Experience Survey provides insights into employee satisfaction, leadership efficacy, learning opportunities, and career development. The insights provided by the survey help improve the American Express colleague experience, workplace culture and business results. We believe that maintaining our strong workplace culture, adhering to our Blue Box Values and ensuring that our people feel included, valued, recognized and backed will help us attract, retain and develop the right talent to lead the Company and successfully execute our corporate strategy. Please see page 39 for additional information about our workplace culture.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 21 |
How our Board Oversees Risk Management
Board of Directors
We are committed to Board-level risk management. Our Board monitors our tone at the top and risk culture and oversees emerging strategic risks. Risk management is overseen by our Board through three Board committees: Risk, Audit and Compliance and Compensation and Benefits. Each committee consists entirely of independent directors and provides regular reports to the Board regarding matters reviewed at their committee. The committees meet regularly in executive sessions with our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Chief Risk Officer, Chief Compliance & Ethics Officer, Chief Audit Executive and other members of senior management with regard to our risk management processes, controls, talent and capabilities
Risk Committee
![]() |
Provides oversight of our enterprise risk management framework, processes and methodologies. Approves our Enterprise Risk Management policy, which covers risk governance, risk oversight and risk appetite, including credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operational risk, reputational risk, country risk, model risk, asset-liability management risk and strategic, business risk and ESG risk, including, but not limited to, climate change risk. Our Enterprise Risk Management policy: |
◾ | Defines the authorized risk limits to control exposures within our risk capacity and risk tolerance, including stressed forward-looking scenarios |
◾ | Establishes principles for risk taking in the aggregate and for each risk type, and is supported by a comprehensive system for monitoring limits, escalation triggers and assessing control programs |
![]() |
Reviews and concurs in the appointment, replacement, performance and compensation of our Chief Risk Officer |
![]() |
Receives regular updates from the Chief Risk Officer on key risks, transactions and exposures |
![]() |
Receives reports on cybersecurity and related risks at least twice a year |
![]() |
Reviews our risk profile against the tolerances specified in the Risk Appetite Framework, including significant risk exposures, risk trends in our portfolios and major risk concentrations |
![]() |
Provides oversight of managements execution of capital management, liquidity planning and resolution planning |
![]() |
Monitors the quality and effectiveness of the Companys technology security, data privacy and disaster recovery capabilities |
Audit and Compliance Committee
![]() |
Assists the Board in its oversight responsibilities relating to the integrity of our annual and quarterly consolidated financial statements and financial reporting process, internal and external auditing, including the qualifications and independence of the Companys independent registered public accounting firm and the performance of our internal audit services function, and the integrity of our systems of internal control over financial reporting and legal and regulatory compliance |
![]() |
Provides oversight of our Internal Audit Department |
![]() |
Periodically reviews and discusses with management and the Companys independent registered public accounting firm the Companys accounting policies, critical accounting estimates and critical auditing matters |
![]() |
Reviews and concurs in the appointment, replacement, performance and compensation of our Chief Audit Executive and approves Internal Audits annual audit plan, charter, policies, budget and overall risk assessment methodology |
![]() |
Receives regular updates on the status of the audit plan and results including significant reports issued by Internal Audit and the status of our corrective actions |
![]() |
Reviews and approves our compliance policies, which include our Compliance Risk Tolerance Statement |
![]() |
Reviews the effectiveness of our Corporate-wide Compliance Risk Management Program |
![]() |
Appoints, replaces, reviews and evaluates the qualifications of the Companys independent registered public accounting firm |
Compensation and Benefits Committee
![]() |
Works with the Chief Colleague Experience Officer and the Chief Risk Officer to ensure our overall compensation programs, as well as those covering our business units and risk-taking employees, appropriately balance risk with business incentives and that business performance is achieved without taking imprudent or excessive risk |
◾ | Our Chief Risk Officer is actively involved in setting goals, including for our business units |
◾ | Our Chief Risk Officer also reviews the current and forward-looking risk profiles of each business unit and provides input into performance evaluations |
◾ | Our Chief Risk Officer meets with the committee and attests as to whether performance goals and results have been achieved without taking imprudent risks |
![]() |
Uses a risk-balanced incentive compensation framework to decide on our bonus pools and the compensation of senior executives |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 22 |
Board Oversight of Cybersecurity
We are a global financial services company and understand the substantial operational risks for companies in our industry as well as the importance of preserving the trust of our customers and protecting personal information. To that end, we have an extensive cybersecurity governance framework in place. Our Board receives reports on cybersecurity at least once a year and our Risk Committee receives reports on cybersecurity at least twice a year, including in at least one joint meeting with the Audit and Compliance Committee, and all receive ad hoc updates as needed. In addition, the Risk Committee annually approves the Companys Information Security Program.
Our cybersecurity program is designed to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of information and information systems from unauthorized access, use, disclosure, disruption, modification or destruction. The program is built upon a foundation of advanced security technology, a well-staffed and highly trained team of experts, and robust operations based on the National Institute of Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework. This consists of controls designed to identify, protect, detect, respond to and recover from information and cybersecurity incidents. The framework defines risks and associated controls which are embedded in our processes and technology. Those controls are measured and monitored by a combination of subject matter experts and a security operations center with our integrated cyber detection, response and recovery capabilities.
Program Highlights
![]() |
We have a robust Cyber Crisis Response Plan in place that provides a documented framework for handling high-severity security incidents and facilitates coordination across multiple parts of the Company. |
![]() |
We deploy a defense-in-depth strategy with multiple layers of controls, including embedding security into our technology investments. |
![]() |
We invest in threat intelligence and are active participants in industry and government forums to improve sector cybersecurity defense. |
![]() |
We collaborate with our peers in the areas of threat intelligence, vulnerability management and response and drills. |
![]() |
We routinely perform simulations and drills at both a technical and management level. |
![]() |
We incorporate external expertise and reviews in all aspects of our program. |
![]() |
All colleagues receive annual cybersecurity awareness training. |
We continuously assess the risks and changes in the cyber environment and dynamically adjust our program and investments as appropriate.
How our Management Oversees Risk
We use our comprehensive Enterprise Risk Management program to identify, aggregate, monitor and manage risks. The program also defines our risk appetite, governance, culture and capabilities. The implementation and execution of the Enterprise Risk Management program is headed by our Chief Risk Officer.
There are several internal management committees, including the Enterprise Risk Management Committee (ERMC), chaired by our Chief Risk Officer. The ERMC is the highest-level management committee to oversee all firm-wide risks and is responsible for risk governance, risk oversight and risk appetite. It maintains the enterprise risk appetite framework and monitors compliance with limits and escalations defined in it. The ERMC oversees implementation of certain risk policies Company-wide. The ERMC reviews key risk exposures, trends and concentrations, and significant compliance matters, and provides guidance on the steps to monitor, control and report major risks.
Our Boards current standing committee membership information is listed on the following pages. Effective March 9, 2022, our Board approved revisions to the membership of our standing committees (see page 3 for our Boards current committee membership). The Compensation and Benefits Committee Chair and Risk Committee Chair reflected below assumed those positions in connection with the election of our new Lead Independent Director on September 26, 2021. Each current member of our standing committees and each member in 2021 was independent and fulfilled the requirements applicable to each committee on which he or she served.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 23 |
Board Committee Responsibilities
Audit and Compliance Committee
| ||||||||
COMMITTEE HIGHLIGHTS
|
9 Meetings in 2021 |
2021 Members Thomas J. Baltimore John J. Brennan Ralph de la Vega (Chair) Michael O. Leavitt Karen L. Parkhill |
Independence Each member of the committee is independent and financially literate. |
Audit Committee Each of Mr. Brennan, Mr. de la Vega and Ms. Parkhill meet the | ||||
Role and Responsibilities ◾ Assists the Board in its oversight of the integrity of our consolidated financial statements and related financial reporting processes, and internal and external auditing, including the qualifications and the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, the performance of the Companys Internal Audit services function, the integrity of our systems of internal control over financial reporting, and legal and regulatory compliance. See page 45 under Report of the Audit and Compliance Committee for additional information regarding the duties of the committee with respect to oversight of our financial reporting process ◾ Appoints, replaces, reviews and evaluates the qualifications of the Companys independent registered public accounting firm ◾ Oversees the process for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of complaints we receive regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters ◾ Reviews and discusses reports from management regarding significant reported ethics violations under our Code of Conduct and other corporate governance policies ◾ Meets regularly in executive session with management, including with the Companys Chief Financial Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Chief Compliance & Ethics Officer and Chief Audit Executive, and also with the Lead Engagement Partner from the Companys independent registered public accounting firm
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 24 |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 25 |
Our Corporate Governance Framework
We have adopted Corporate Governance Principles that, together with the charters of the four standing committees of the Board (Audit and Compliance, Compensation and Benefits, Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility and Risk), our Code of Conduct (which constitutes our code of ethics for colleagues) and the Code of Business Conduct for Members of the Board of Directors, provide our governance framework. Key governance policies and processes also include our Whistleblower Policy, our comprehensive Enterprise Risk Management Program, our commitment to transparent financial reporting and our systems of internal checks and balances. Comprehensive management policies, many of which are approved at the Board committee level, guide the Companys operations.
Our Board, along with management, regularly reviews our Corporate Governance Principles and practices to ensure that they are appropriate and reflect our high standards and Blue Box Values. In reviewing our Corporate Governance Principles and making recommendations, the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee considers the views of shareholders expressed to us in engagement meetings, as well as publicly available discourse on governance.
You may view the following documents by clicking on the Corporate Governance link found on our Investor Relations webpage at http://ir.americanexpress.com and then selecting Governance Framework. You may also access our Investor Relations webpage through our main website at www.americanexpress.com by clicking on the About American Express link, which is located at the bottom of the Companys homepage. You may also obtain free copies of the following materials by writing to our Companys Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer:
◾ | Corporate Governance Principles |
◾ | Charters for each of the four standing Board committees |
◾ | Code of Conduct (which constitutes our code of ethics for colleagues) |
◾ | Code of Business Conduct for Members of the Board of Directors |
Majority Voting Standard for Director Elections
In a non-contested election, directors are elected by a majority of for votes cast by shareholders. A non-contested election is an election where the number of nominees is the same as the number of directors to be elected. If a director receives a greater number of votes against than votes for his or her election, the director is required to immediately submit his or her resignation to the Board. The Board, excluding such individual, will decide whether or not to accept such resignation and will promptly disclose and explain its decision in a Form 8-K filed with the SEC.
In a contested election, the director nominees who receive the plurality of votes cast are elected as directors. Under the plurality standard, the number of persons equal to the number of vacancies to be filled who receive more votes than other nominees are elected to the Board, regardless of whether they receive a majority of votes cast. An election is considered contested under our Certificate of Incorporation if there are more nominees than positions on the Board to be filled at the meeting of shareholders as of the fourteenth day prior to the date on which we file our definitive proxy statement with the SEC.
Our Policy on Director Outside Board Commitments
Our Board expects individual directors to allot sufficient time and attention to Company matters and to use their judgment and consider all of their commitments when accepting additional directorships on other corporations or charitable organizations. Our Board also recognizes that some directors have the time and ability to maintain the focus and commitment expected at our Board and committee meetings as well as those of other public companies. Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that a director should not serve on the boards of more than four public companies (including ours) or, if the director is an active Chief Executive Officer or equivalent of another public company, on the boards of more than three public companies (including ours). Additionally, a director who serves on our Audit and Compliance Committee should not serve on more than two other public company audit committees. Our Board believes that our policy strikes the right balance by allowing for the depth and breadth of experience gained through membership on other boards and the time commitment needed for engaged board service.
Our Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee believes it is important for directors to balance the insights gained from their roles on other boards with the ability to prepare for, attend and participate effectively in our Board and committee meetings. As a result, the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee evaluates director performance to ensure directors continue to have the time and commitment to fulfill their obligations to our Board. When vetting prospective directors, a key component of the Companys due diligence process includes inquiry into whether an individual has sufficient capacity to devote to being an engaged and productive member of our Board. During the annual re-nomination process, the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee considers a number of factors when deciding whether to renominate a director, including meeting attendance, individual contributions at meetings, the role of a director on other boards (with consideration given to public company board leadership positions), the commitment levels and time demands of outside activities, peer review feedback from one-on-one meetings held by each of our Chairman and Lead Independent Director with directors throughout the year and the results of the annual Board evaluation. Specifically, our annual evaluation process overseen by the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee addresses topics including director commitment levels, engagement, effectiveness, and preparedness, and the results are discussed by each committee and our Board. Our Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee confirms that all of our directors standing for re-election comply with our outside board commitment policy at this time.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 26 |
We are aware that some of our shareholders have their own outside board commitment policies that are more restrictive than our policy and, specifically, that Thomas J. Baltimore, Jr. exceeds some of our shareholders policies as a public company CEO sitting on three public company boards. As indicated above, when our Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee was considering whether to nominate Mr. Baltimore to our Board, extensive due diligence regarding his capacity to serve was conducted, including consideration of his other public company leadership roles and outside commitments. Mr. Baltimores long-standing track record of effective engagement and stellar attendance records at his other public boards as well as professional references regarding his active participation on other public company boards were among the many factors that guided the Company in proceeding with Mr. Baltimores nomination. Our Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee reviewed and considered the factors and information described above when deciding to renominate Mr. Baltimore this year. Mr. Baltimore has also met with certain of our shareholders at their request to discuss his board commitments and his capacity to serve. Our Board believed, and continues to believe, that Mr. Baltimore allocates ample time and attention to Company matters.
Our Board seeks the right mix of directors with skills to accomplish our long-term goals and strategy, and conducts extensive due diligence when evaluating prospective director nominees and during the annual renomination process. Our Board requests that shareholders consider the points above when applying their respective director commitment criteria and/or policies.
Director Attendance
Our meeting attendance policy is set forth in our Corporate Governance Principles. During 2021, our Board met six times and our committees met 27 times. All directors attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board and Board committees on which they served in 2021.
All of our directors serving on our Board at the time of our 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (held virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic) attended the meeting virtually. Our Board strongly encourages all of its members to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders but understands there may be exigent circumstances, especially during these unprecedented times. Despite the extraordinary circumstances created by the pandemic, the Board continued to meet regularly on a virtual basis throughout the year.
Executive Sessions
Executive sessions of independent directors, led by our Lead Independent Director, enable the Board to discuss matters, such as strategy, CEO and senior management performance and compensation, succession planning and board effectiveness, without management present. Any director may request additional executive sessions of independent directors. During 2021, our independent directors met in executive session at each regularly scheduled Board meeting.
Our Boards Size
Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that while the Board need not adhere to a fixed number of directors, generally a board of 12-14 directors offers a sufficiently large and diverse group to address the important issues facing the Company and provides a wide range of perspectives, while being small enough to encourage personal involvement and discussion. We recognize that at times the number of directors on our Board may be higher than this range during periods of succession planning-related transitions, and when this occurs, expect the size of our Board to subsequently come back to within this range (12-14) as directors do not stand for re-election in accordance with our mandatory retirement age or to pursue other interests.
Proxy Access
A shareholder or group of no more than 20 shareholders that has owned at least 3% of our common shares for at least three years may nominate directors to our Board and include the nominees in our proxy materials to be voted on at our Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The maximum number of shareholder nominees that will be included in our proxy materials with respect to any such Annual Meeting of Shareholders is the greater of (i) two or (ii) 20% of directors to be elected. A shareholder who seeks to nominate a director or directors to our Board must provide proper notice to the Companys Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer under the terms of our bylaws.
Trading in Company Securities
We prohibit hedging and pledging transactions in Company securities by executive officers and directors. Employees that are not executive officers are also prohibited from hedging Company securities and discouraged from pledging Company securities.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 27 |
Additionally, we require members of senior management as well as our directors to pre-clear every transaction in Company securities for themselves, their immediate family members, and any family trust with the Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer. This includes gifts, transactions in discretionary accounts and non-routine transactions such as optional cash purchases in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
Our Boards Independence
13/14 |
Director Nominees are Independent |
Our Corporate Governance Principles require that a significant majority of our directors shall meet the criteria for independence required by the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). A director is considered independent if the Board determines that he or she does not have a material relationship with the Company. In making its annual independence determinations, the Board considers transactions between each director nominee and the Company. Our Board has established guidelines to assist it in determining director independence. These guidelines can be found within our Corporate Governance Principles and cover, among other things, employment and compensatory relationships, relationships with our auditors, customer and business relationships, and contributions to nonprofit organizations.
Based on our guidelines, the Board determined in March 2022 that all of its members in 2022, other than Mr. Squeri, and all of the Boards director nominees for election at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, other than Mr. Squeri, are independent.
Effective March 1, 2021, Ambassador Barshefsky retired as a partner from the law firm of WilmerHale, an international law firm based in Washington, D.C. From time to time and in the ordinary course of its business, WilmerHale provides legal services to American Express that we consider to be de minimis in nature. Ambassador Barshefsky did not provide any such legal services, and she did not receive any compensation from the firm that is generated by or related to our payments to WilmerHale for such services. The Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee determined, based on fees paid to the firm over the past three years, that WilmerHale does not perform substantial legal services for the Company on a regular basis. The fees and expenses paid to WilmerHale represented less than 1% of the firms annual revenue in each of the past three years and represented less than 0.1% of American Express revenues in each such year. Further, the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee reviewed the nature of American Express engagement of WilmerHale and the services rendered, including the expertise and relevant experience of the firm and the specific partners engaged to work on the matters for which we have engaged the firm, and determined that Ambassador Barshefskys service on our Board should not impair our ability to engage WilmerHale when we determine such engagements to be appropriate and in our best interests. The committee is satisfied that WilmerHale, when engaged for legal work, is chosen by American Express legal group on the basis of the directly relevant factors of experience, expertise and efficiency. After considering the foregoing, the committee determined and recommended to the Board that American Express professional engagement of WilmerHale does not impair Ambassador Barshefskys independence.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 28 |
Our Boards Commitment to Shareholder Engagement
|
Why We Engage | |||
Our directors and management recognize the benefits that come from robust dialogue with shareholders and other relevant parties and we have embraced an active engagement strategy for many years. We engage with shareholders throughout the year in order to:
◾ Provide visibility and transparency into our business, our performance and our corporate governance, ESG and compensation practices;
◾ Discuss with our shareholders the issues that are important to them, hear their expectations for us and share our views; and
◾ Assess emerging issues that may affect our business, inform our decision making, enhance our corporate disclosures and help shape our practices. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 29 |
How We Engage
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 30 |
How to Communicate with our Board
You may communicate with the Board or an individual director by letter or email, directed in care of the Companys Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer, who will forward your communication to the intended recipient. However, at the discretion of the Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer, materials considered to be inappropriate or harassing, unsolicited advertisements, or promotional materials and invitations to conferences may not be forwarded.
If you have an inquiry about our financial statements, accounting practices or internal controls, please direct your concern to the Chair of the Audit and Compliance Committee. If the inquiry relates to our governance practices, business ethics or corporate conduct, it should be directed to the Chair of the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee or the Lead Independent Director. Matters relating to executive compensation may be directed to the Chair of the Compensation and Benefits Committee. If you are unsure of the category to which your concern relates, you may communicate it to any one of the independent directors, to the Lead Independent Director or to the Chairman.
Please direct such communications in care of the Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer as follows:
Kristina V. Fink
Corporate Secretary and Chief Governance Officer
American Express Company
200 Vesey Street
New York, NY 10285
corporatesecretarysoffice@aexp.com
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 31 |
The Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee reviews director compensation and seeks to compensate our directors in a manner that attracts and retains highly qualified directors and aligns the interests of our directors with those of our long-term shareholders. No changes were made to the Companys non-management director compensation programs for 2021.
The following table provides information on the 2021 compensation of non-management directors who served for all or a part of 2021. We reimburse directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses attendant to their board service.
Name |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) |
Stock Awards(2) |
All Other Compensation(3) |
Total | ||||||||||||||||
Thomas J. Baltimore(4) |
$ |
109,111 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
1,613 |
$ |
310,724 |
||||||||||||
Charlene Barshefsky |
$ |
120,000 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
120,666 |
$ |
440,666 |
||||||||||||
John J. Brennan(5) |
$ |
166,746 |
$ |
219,769 |
$ |
27,441 |
$ |
413,956 |
||||||||||||
Peter Chernin |
$ |
145,000 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
78,360 |
$ |
423,360 |
||||||||||||
Ralph de la Vega |
$ |
151,333 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
28,099 |
$ |
379,432 |
||||||||||||
Anne L. Lauvergeon(6) |
$ |
41,785 |
$ |
|
$ |
17,398 |
$ |
59,183 |
||||||||||||
Michael O. Leavitt |
$ |
135,000 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
39,243 |
$ |
374,243 |
||||||||||||
Theodore J. Leonsis |
$ |
130,000 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
59,728 |
$ |
389,728 |
||||||||||||
Karen L. Parkhill |
$ |
145,272 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
13,255 |
$ |
358,527 |
||||||||||||
Charles E. Phillips |
$ |
116,333 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
1,803 |
$ |
318,136 |
||||||||||||
Lynn A. Pike |
$ |
117,792 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
135,255 |
$ |
453,047 |
||||||||||||
Daniel L. Vasella |
$ |
134,694 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
60,653 |
$ |
395,347 |
||||||||||||
Lisa W. Wardell(7) |
$ |
98,000 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
1,498 |
$ |
299,498 |
||||||||||||
Ronald A. Williams(8) |
$ |
159,456 |
$ |
255,231 |
$ |
137,510 |
$ |
552,197 |
||||||||||||
Christopher D. Young |
$ |
135,042 |
$ |
200,000 |
$ |
18,006 |
$ |
353,048 |
(1) | Annual Retainers. For service in 2021, we paid non-management directors an annual retainer of $100,000 for board service. We paid an additional annual retainer of $20,000 to members of the Audit and Compliance and Risk Committees, $15,000 to members of the Compensation and Benefits Committee and Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee. We also paid an annual retainer to the Chair of each of the Board committees as follows: Audit and Compliance and Risk, $20,000; and Compensation and Benefits and Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility, $15,000. We pay no fees for attending meetings, but the annual retainer for board service of $100,000 is reduced by $20,000 if a director does not attend at least 75% of his or her aggregate board and committee meetings. Our Lead Independent Director receives an annual retainer of $100,000, of which $25,000 is paid in cash and included in this column and the remaining $75,000 is credited to the directors stock equivalent unit (SEU) account (see footnote 2). During 2021, we had two Lead Independent Directors, Ronald A. Williams and John J. Brennan, who received pro-rated retainers of $73,641 and $26,359, respectively, |
All non-management directors, except Charlene Barshefsky, Theodore J. Leonsis, Karen L. Parkhill, Lynn A. Pike and Ronald A. Williams, deferred all or a portion of their 2021 retainers into a cash account, a SEU account, or both, under the deferred compensation plan described below in footnote 2. |
(2) | Share Equivalent Unit Plan. To align our non-management directors annual compensation with shareholder interests, each non-management director is credited with common SEUs upon election or reelection at each annual meeting of shareholders. Each SEU reflects the value of one common share. Directors receive additional SEUs as dividend equivalents on the units in their accounts. SEUs do not carry voting rights and must be held at least until a director ends his or her service on the Board. Each SEU is payable in cash equal to the then-value of one common share at the time of distribution to the director. On May 4, 2021, the date of last years annual meeting, each non-management director elected to the Board was credited with SEUs having a value of $200,000, which consisted of 1,339 SEUs, based on the market price of our common shares for the average of the 15 trading days immediately preceding such date. In addition, our Lead Independent Directors during 2021, Ronald A. Williams and John J. Brennan, received a pro-rated annual SEU retainer of $55,231 and $19,769, respectively, which consisted of 351 and 121 SEUs, respectively, based on the market price of our common shares for the average of the last 10 trading days of such calendar quarter. We report in this column the aggregate grant date fair value of these SEUs in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, CompensationStock Compensation. |
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors. Non-management directors may defer the receipt of up to 100% of their annual retainer fees into either: (1) a cash account in which amounts deferred will be credited at the rate of 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate for December of the prior year or (2) their SEU account. Directors will receive cash payments upon payout of their deferrals. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 32 |
The balances in directors SEU accounts as of December 31, 2021, are set forth in the table below. These amounts represent the aggregate number of SEUs granted under the SEU Plan for all years of service as a director and additional units credited because of the reinvestment of dividend equivalents and, for directors who participated in the SEU option under our deferred compensation plan for directors, retainer amounts deferred into their SEU account and dividend equivalents thereon. |
Name |
Number of SEUs | |||
Thomas J. Baltimore |
|
2,027 |
| |
Charlene Barshefsky |
|
71,249 |
| |
John J. Brennan |
|
17,464 |
| |
Peter Chernin |
|
46,494 |
| |
Ralph de la Vega |
|
17,674 |
| |
Anne L. Lauvergeon |
|
4,072 |
| |
Michael O. Leavitt |
|
23,604 |
| |
Theodore J. Leonsis |
|
35,591 |
| |
Karen L. Parkhill |
|
3,716 |
| |
Charles E. Phillips |
|
2,151 |
| |
Lynn A. Pike |
|
3,716 |
| |
Daniel L. Vasella |
|
36,641 |
| |
Lisa W. Wardell |
|
1,948 |
| |
Ronald A. Williams |
|
76,593 |
| |
Christopher D. Young |
|
11,697 |
|
(3) | Insurance. We provide our non-management directors with group term life insurance coverage of $50,000. The group life insurance policy is provided to the directors on a basis generally available to all Company employees. This column includes the premium paid for such coverage. |
Dividend Equivalents. Dividend equivalents are reinvested in additional units for all directors based upon total SEUs held at the time of Company quarterly dividend payment dates. This column includes the fair market value of the dividend equivalents received by the directors during 2021 in these amounts: Mr. Baltimore $1,561, Amb. Barshefsky $120,614, Mr. Brennan $27,390, Mr. Chernin $78,309, Mr. de la Vega $28,047, Ms. Lauvergeon $17,381, Gov. Leavitt $39,192, Mr. Leonsis $59,676, Ms. Parkhill $5,203, Mr. Phillips $1,751, Ms. Pike $5,203, Dr. Vasella $60,601, Ms. Wardell $1,459, Mr. Williams $129,458, and Mr. Young $17,954. |
Directors Charitable Award Program. We maintain a Directors Charitable Award Program for directors elected prior to July 1, 2004. To fund this program, we purchased joint life insurance on the lives of participating directors. The death benefit of $500,000 funds a donation to a charitable organization that the director recommends. The Company paid no premiums for the policies of non-management directors who served for all or part of 2021. |
Matching Gift Program. Directors are eligible to participate in the Companys Matching Gift Program on the same basis as Company employees. Under this program, the American Express Foundation matches gifts to approved charitable organizations up to $8,000 per calendar year. This column includes the amounts matched with respect to calendar year 2021. |
Other Retainers. Ms. Pike is Co-Chair of the Board of Directors of American Express National Bank (AENB), our U.S. bank subsidiary. For her services as Co-Chair and member of both the Audit Committee and Risk and Compliance Committee of AENB, Ms. Pike received an annual cash retainer totaling $130,000, which is included in this column. |
(4) | Mr. Baltimore was elected to our Board effective January 27, 2021. |
(5) | Mr. Brennan was elected as Lead Independent Director effective September 26, 2021. |
(6) | Ms. Lauvergeon retired from our Board effective May 4, 2021. |
(7) | Ms. Wardell was elected to our Board effective March 8, 2021. |
(8) | Mr. Williams stepped down as Lead Independent Director effective September 25, 2021. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 33 |
Our Corporate Governance Principles provide that non-management directors are required to obtain a personal holding of shares (directly or through SEUs) with a value of $1 million within five years of joining the Board. All non-management directors have achieved or are on track to achieve this requirement during the required time period.
Director and Officer Liability Insurance
We have an insurance program in place to provide coverage for director and officer liability. The coverage provides that, subject to the policy terms and conditions, the insurers will: (i) reimburse us when we are legally permitted to indemnify our directors and officers; (ii) pay losses, including settlements, judgments and legal fees, on behalf of our directors and officers when we cannot indemnify them; and (iii) pay our losses resulting from certain securities claims. A portion of the insurance program is blended with certain other insurances covering the Company. The insurance program is effective from November 30, 2021 to November 30, 2022 and is provided by a consortium of insurers. ACE American Insurance Company and XL Specialty Insurance Company are the lead insurers with various other insurers providing excess coverage. We expect to obtain similar coverage upon expiration of the current insurance program. The annual premium for the insurance program is approximately $5.7 million.
Certain Relationships and Transactions
In the ordinary course of our business, we engage in transactions, arrangements and relationships with many other entities, including financial institutions and professional organizations. Some of our directors, director nominees, executive officers, greater than 5% shareholders, and their immediate family members (each, a Related Person) may be directors, officers, partners, employees or shareholders of these entities. We carry out transactions with these entities on customary terms and, in many instances, these Related Persons may not have knowledge of them. To the Companys knowledge, since January 1, 2021, no Related Person has had a material interest in any of our ongoing business transactions or relationships except as described in this section.
Our Related Person Transaction Policy
Our written Related Person Transaction Policy governs company transactions, arrangements and relationships involving more than $120,000 in which a Related Person has a direct or indirect material interest (Related Person Transactions). Under the policy, the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee must provide prior review and oversight of, and approval or disapproval of, Related Person Transactions, other than certain pre-approved transactions (described below). The committee will only approve a transaction if, after reviewing the relevant facts and circumstances, it determines that the transaction is consistent with the best interests of the Company. In the event we become aware of a Related Person Transaction that was not approved under the policy, the committee will consider the options available, including ratification, revision or termination of the transaction. The policy does not supersede any other company policy or procedure that may apply to any Related Person Transaction, including our Corporate Governance Principles and codes of conduct.
The Companys Corporate Secretary is responsible for assisting the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee in carrying out its responsibilities, and management is required to present to the committee the material facts of any transaction that it believes may require review. In cases when it is impracticable or undesirable to delay a decision on a proposed transaction until the next meeting of the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee, the Chair may review and approve the transaction and then report any approval to the full committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting. If a matter before the Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee involves a member of the committee, the member must recuse themselves and may not participate in deliberations or vote on the matter.
Pre-Approved Categories of Related Person Transactions
The Nominating, Governance and Public Responsibility Committee has pre-approved certain categories of transactions as being consistent with the best interests of the Company. These categories, which may exceed the proscribed threshold for Related Person Transactions, include but are not limited to, director and executive officer compensation, use of Company products and services, transactions involving indebtedness to the Company, certain banking-related transactions, certain ordinary course transactions, charitable contributions and indemnification payments.
Related Person Transactions
Our executive officers and directors may from time to time take out loans from certain of our subsidiaries on the same terms that these subsidiaries offer to the general public. For example, our U.S. card-issuing bank may extend credit to our directors and executive officers under our charge or lending products. All indebtedness from these transactions is in the ordinary course of our business and is on the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, in effect for comparable transactions with other people. Such indebtedness involves normal risks of collection and does not have features or terms that are unfavorable to our subsidiaries. Our executive officers and directors may also enter into transactions with us involving other goods and services, such as travel services and investments in deposit products offered by subsidiaries of the Company. These transactions are also in the ordinary course of our business, and we provide them on terms that we offer to our customers generally. Occasionally, we may have employees who are related to our executive officers, directors or director nominees. We compensate these individuals in a manner consistent with our practices that apply to all employees. The sister-in-law of Mr. Squeri, our Chairman and CEO, is employed by the Company in a non-executive position and received compensation in 2021 of between $315,000 and $355,000. The compensation and other terms of employment of Mr. Squeris sister-in-law are determined on a basis consistent with the Companys human resources policies.
Certain executive officers, directors and members of their immediate families are directors, employees or have equity interests in companies with whom the Company has entered into ordinary course business relationships from time to time and with whom the Company may enter into additional ordinary course business relationships. These may include ordinary course merchant acceptance relationships pursuant to which these companies accept our charge and credit card products and pay us fees when their customers use these cards, as well as use of the Companys cards and financial and other products and services, including extensions of credit, on terms and conditions similar to those available to other customers generally. From time to time, we may enter into joint marketing or other relationships with one or more of these companies in the ordinary course that encourage customers to apply for and use our cards. We may engage in other commercial transactions with these companies and pay or receive fees in those transactions. We have a number of similar ordinary course relationships with Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and its subsidiaries. We have also purchased insurance and other products from subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in the ordinary course of business and on arms-length terms. For information regarding a letter agreement between us and Berkshire Hathaway Inc. related to Berkshires investment in the Company, please see Stock Ownership Information on pages 82-83. Additionally, the Company may from time to time make charitable contributions to nonprofit organizations where our directors or executive officers are directors or trustees.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 34 |
Our Commitment to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG)
At American Express, we believe effective ESG management can help chart a path to a sustainable, inclusive, and successful future. For years, we have mobilized our business to address pressing global challenges and back our colleagues, customers, communities, and partners.
In 2020 and 2021, we built on these strong foundations by rolling out a new global ESG strategy that sets ambitious goals in three critical areas for our Company, stakeholders, and society: Promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DE&I); Build Financial Confidence; and Advance Climate Solutions. This new global ESG strategy represents an evolution of our longstanding commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and is based on an assessment of the priority ESG issues that matter most to our business and stakeholders.
ESG Strategy Framework
MISSION: BACK PEOPLE AND BUSINESSES TO THRIVE AND CREATE EQUITABLE, RESILIENT, AND SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES GLOBALLY |
STAKEHOLDERS INCLUDING SHAREHOLDERS, COLLEAGUES, CUSTOMERS, AND COMMUNITIES |
SOUND GOVERNANCE INCLUDING BUSINESS ETHICS, TRANSPARENCY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY |
Key Pillars |
||||||||
Nominating, Governance, and Public Responsibility Committee |
||||||||
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE |
ESG STEERING COMMITTEE |
ESG WORKING GROUPS |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 35 |
Our ESG strategy roadmap lays out the new goals we developed in 2020 and 2021 to support our ESG pillars. Our new goals build on our previously announced targets, including our $1 billion DE&I Action Plan, longstanding support of small businesses, and pledge to maintain carbon neutral operations.
Promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
New Goals
|
◾ Maintain 100% pay equity across genders globally and across races and ethnicities in the US
◾ Double annual spend with diverse and minority- owned suppliers in the US from a 2019 baseline to $750 million by the end of 2024, including increasing spend with Black-owned suppliers to at least $100 million annually
◾ Provide access to capital and financial education to at least 250,000 Black- and minority-owned small- and medium-sized businesses in the US from late 2020 through 2024 |
◾ Develop more inclusive marketing initiatives, as well as design and build product experiences and programs that better meet the needs of underrepresented consumer and business customers
◾ Provide $50 million in grants from late 2020 through 2024 to nonprofits led by people of color or members of underrepresented groups, including organizations focused on addressing inequality and promoting social justice
◾ Increase the representation of American Express Leadership Academy participants in the US who are people of color or from underrepresented groups from 50% in 2019 to 75% by the end of 2024
|
Build Financial Confidence
New Goals
|
◾ Provide access to credit to at least 4 million individuals from underserved or underrepresented populations from 2021 through 2025
◾ Provide at least 5 million individuals with tools, resources, and educational content to improve financial well-being from 2021 through 2025
|
◾ Support small businesses, including by reaching $100 billion in spending by consumers at small, independently owned retailers or restaurants on Small Business Saturday and during other Shop Small campaigns from 2021 through 20251
◾ Invest $500 million to build more resilient and equitable communities from 2021 through 2025
|
Advance Climate Solutions
New Goals
|
◾ Commit to net-zero emissions by 2035 in alignment with the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi)
◾ Enhance the management of climate-related risks and opportunities across our business
◾ Pilot low-carbon product innovations, including carbon tracking and offset solutions, by the end of 2022 |
◾ Provide at least $10 million to support initiatives, partnerships, and programs that address the adverse effects of climate change and pollution on communities from 2021 through 2025
◾ Engage our colleagues in sustainability initiatives through the Green2Gether program
Learn more about our 2025 operational environmental goals on page 58 of our 2020-2021 ESG Report
|
1 | Based on spend as reported by consumers in surveys commissioned by American Express (not actual receipts or sales). |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 36 |
Promote Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
|
◾ Spent more than $800 million on DE&I initiatives since announcing our $1 billion DE&I Action Plan in October 2020 through December 2021
◾ Published our inaugural Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Report documenting our progress on our DE&I commitments and initiatives
◾ Maintained 100% pay equity for colleagues across genders globally and across races and ethnicities in the United States
◾ Provided more than $10 million in grants to nonprofits led by people of color or members of underrepresented groups, including organizations focused on addressing inequality and promoting social justice, bringing the total to more than $14 million since announcing our commitment of $50 million by 2024 in October 2020
◾ Enhanced our ESG disclosures, including publishing our US EEO-1 data, workforce diversity data on the companys hiring, promotions, and colleague retention efforts, and the raw median pay gap for women globally and for racially or ethnically diverse colleagues in the U.S.
◾ Partnered with the U.S. Black Chambers, Inc. to launch ByBlack, a first-of-its-kind, national certification exclusively for Black-owned businesses to verify that they are majority-owned by Black and African American individuals
|
1 | The American Express 2021 Small Business Saturday Consumer Insights Survey was conducted by Teneo on behalf of American Express and the National Federation of Independent Business (NFIB). The study is a nationally representative sample of 2,426 U.S. adults 18 years of age or older. The sample was collected using an email invitation and an online survey. The study gathered self-reported data and does not reflect actual receipts or sales. It was conducted anonymously on November 28, 2021. The survey has an overall margin of error of +/- 2.0%, at the 95% level of confidence. Projections are based on the current U.S. Census estimates of the U.S. adult population, age 18 years and over. |
2 | Achieved carbon neutral operations for Scope 1 (direct emissions from sources owned or controlled by American Express), Scope 2 (indirect location-based and market-based emissions), and Scope 3 (waste and employee business travel, including third-party air, rail, and rental cars) emissions through renewable energy credits, carbon offsets, and reduced GHG emissions. Operations include all our managed facilities, field sites, and data centers. Managed facilities are individual properties operationally managed by our global real estate team and housing critical business functions. Field sites are individual properties that are not operationally managed by our global real estate team but directly by our business units. They are typically smaller sites, less than 30,000 square feet (including airport lounges, foreign exchange kiosks, and sales offices) that are owned or leased by American Express. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 37 |
Our Boards Nominating, Governance, and Public Responsibility Committee reviews our ESG strategy and CSR program, monitors progress against our goals, and provides guidance on our efforts. Our Executive Committee also reviews and evaluates ESG performance and long-term goals with support from our ESG Steering Committee. Led by senior executives from across the Company, the ESG Steering Committee developed the goals for our ESG strategy, drawing on the expertise of cross-functional ESG Working Groups. Day to day, our ESG team is responsible for oversight and coordination of ESG issues and works with colleagues throughout the company to shape our ESG programs and monitor progress against our goals.
Additionally, ESG risks, in particular climate risk, have been included as an emerging risk for the Company, and are part of our Enterprise Risk Management framework. Climate-related risks are currently managed as part of our Enterprise Risk Management process. The Risk Committee of our Board of Directors provides oversight of our Enterprise Risk Management framework, processes, and methodologies, and approves our Enterprise Risk Management policy, which governs risk governance, risk oversight, and risk appetite.
Executive compensation is also increasingly linked to our ESG goals. For example, in years past, the Companys annual scorecards Colleague category included diversity representation, talent retention, culture and inclusion metrics as part of the calculation to determine incentive compensation for all eligible colleagues and in 2021, we also incorporated the management of key ESG priorities, including metrics, into our executive compensation program under the Strategic category of our annual scorecard. The Compensation and Benefits Committee of the Board oversees performance goals and certifies performance outcomes on topics including diversity representation and talent retention metrics. For more information, see the Compensation, Discussion & Analysis section of this proxy statement.
Office of Enterprise Inclusion, Diversity and Business Engagement
In 2020, we established a new Office of Enterprise Inclusion, Diversity, and Business Engagement, reporting directly to the Chairman and CEO. This expert team guides the DE&I Action Plans rollout, partnering closely with our Executive Committee, Chief Colleague Diversity, Equity & Inclusion and Talent Officer, and Colleague Advisory Networks worldwide (see graphic below).
Chairman and CEO |
Office of Enterprise Inclusion, Diversity, and Business Engagement |
Colleague Advisory Networks |
Key Pillars |
||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Brand Authentically build |
Customer Develop holistic strategy |
Culture Become a company consideration of equity is integrated |
Colleague Create a culture that and advancement
that |
Business Develop holistic strategy
|
Community Combat systemic racism |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 38 |
We monitor our performance across several environmental, social and governance-related ratings and rankings. Highlights from 2021 include:
|
CDP (Climate Change) Rating A- |
|
Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Index Score of 100%
|
|
Inclusion in Bloombergs Gender-Equality Index |
|||||||||||||
|
Inclusion in FTSE4Good Index Series |
|
MSCI (ESG) Rating AA
|
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion
We have a longstanding commitment to building an inclusive and diverse workplace that values every voice, rewards teamwork, celebrates different points of view, and reflects the diversity of the communities in which we operate.
That ongoing commitment is reflected in one of the core pillars of our new ESG strategyPromoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. Within this pillar, we have commitments to enhance diverse representation, provide equal pay and opportunity, and ensure an inclusive culture for our colleagues. Also included in this pillar is our $1 billion multi-year DE&I Action Plan, which is designed to drive meaningful, long-term progress both within and beyond our own workplace. Through 2021, we have spent more than $800 million on a range of actions within the plan, including increasing spend with diverse suppliers, providing financial assistance and resources for minority and women-owned businesses, making investments in pay equity, education, and training for colleagues, and increasing our philanthropic contributions. For more information on how diversity is also a key consideration in our nomination and succession planning processes, please refer to the Ideal Director Nominee Attributes section of this proxy statement.
2021 Global Workforce Representation
To ensure more balanced representation across all levels of our company, we have established recruitment, hiring, and promotion practices to attract, develop, and retain a diverse workforce. Our focus is on promoting an inclusive and equitable culture for all colleagues.
|
|
|
4 | Based on data for the 2021 US Employer Information Report (EEO-1) submission for Black/African American, Hispanic/Latino, Asian, Native American or Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and two or more races. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 39 |
Maintaining 100% Pay Equity
|
In 2021, we maintained 100% pay equity for colleagues across genders globally and across races and ethnicities in the United States.
|
At American Express, we strive to treat everyone who works for us fairly and equally. We are committed to paying all colleagues equitably and maintaining bias-free, transparent compensation practices, and we are proud of our leadership in this area.
Our compensation practices reward colleagues based on performance, and we have policies and processes in place to help ensure we compensate all colleagues fairly and equitably. We review these practices regularly, and since 2017 we have also worked each year with independent experts to conduct a pay equity review. Since 2019, this analysis has covered our entire global colleague base across genders globally and across races and ethnicities in the U.S., assessing pay on a statistical basis and considering key factors that influence compensation, including but not limited to tenure, role, level, geography, and performance.
In 2020, we reached 100% pay equitymeaning no statistical differences in payfor all genders globally, as well as for colleagues of all races and ethnicities in the U.S. In 2021, we maintained 100% pay equity and continued to make necessary investments and appropriate salary adjustments to reach this goal. We are proud of this achievement and are committed to maintaining this goal going forward.
In 2021, we also raised the level of transparency on pay and other DE&I metrics including disclosing our raw median pay gap as well as providing data on the companys hiring, promotions, and retention efforts for colleagues across gender globally and race and ethnicity in the United States. The raw median pay gap metric compares differences in raw median base pay making no adjustments for factors such as role, level, tenure, performance, or geography. Learn more in our inaugural DE&I report.
Creating an Inclusive Workplace Culture
We work hard to be a great place for our colleagues to join and grow their careers. Our aim is to create a welcoming culture across our global locations, and it starts with our Blue Box Values, which include We Embrace Diversity and We Stand for Inclusion.
Feedback from our colleagues suggests that they feel valued and that we have their backs. We conduct an annual online Colleague Experience Survey to better understand their needs and perspectives, and our Board of Directors and senior management review the results. In 2021, 90% of participants said they would recommend American Express as a great place to work. Based on the surveys findings, we will continue our focus on strong enterprise leadership, and maximizing the positive shift we are seeing in the way we work when it comes to flexibility and agile decision-making. Through our voluntary Self-ID initiative, we will also seek to learn more about how our colleagues identify themselves in order to inform our commitment to DE&I.
Our dedicated colleague networks bring together people who share common experiences and interests. Today, we actively support 14 colleague networks, have over 100 chapters worldwide, and know that on average 1 in every 3 colleagues engages in at least one network.
In 2021, 85% of colleagues received recognition from their peers through Reward Blue. Reward Blue is a global reward and recognition program that we have run since 2010 to reinforce a culture of appreciation where colleagues praise one anothers everyday effort, recognize exceptional results, and celebrate important anniversaries.
Introducing a More Flexible Way of Working for the Future
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, we pivoted quickly to provide the flexibility, resources, and support colleagues needed to stay safe, healthy, and productive. We introduced a range of offerings delivered virtually, including personal counseling, pharmacist and dietitian appointments, wellness coaching, meditation classes, and exercise programs to help colleagues cope with the unprecedented challenges and stress brought about by the pandemic. We offered up to 14 calendar days of COVID-19 leave to all colleagues globally in order to ensure support for those unable to work due to COVID-19 related symptoms. For colleagues enrolled in our US medical plans, we provided coverage for all out-of-pocket medical and pharmacy costs related to COVID-19 testing and treatment.
To provide colleagues with flexibility to obtain the COVID-19 vaccine and boosters, we provided up to twelve hours of paid time off. We also partnered with departments of health and hospitals in the US and India to host on-site vaccine clinics for our colleagues, families, and contractors, and we provided a number of oxygen concentrators free of charge to colleagues and their dependents in India who had been prescribed the equipment to deal with health issues associated with COVID-19.
In 2021, we also granted US colleagues up to one full day of paid time off to vote in federal, state, and local elections, extending the three hours of paid time off provided for voting in 2020.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 40 |
In October 2021, we announced Amex Flex, the companys new way of working model that will provide greater flexibility for colleagues while seeking to preserve the important benefits of our special in-person culture. With Amex Flex, we want to build on the progress weve made working virtually, including becoming more efficient and agile, gaining greater flexibility to manage our professional and personal lives, and levelling the playing field for colleagues across levels and locations.
At the same time, the office will continue to play an important role in our future. We believe being together, in person, has benefits that our colleagues have missed and want to regain, including spontaneous connections and idea sharing, meeting new colleagues and rekindling existing working relationships, team bonding and camaraderie, workspaces designed for creativity and teamwork, and more opportunities for mentorship, in-person coaching, and networking.
Ultimately, our goal is to achieve the best of both worldsmaintaining the creativity, connections, collaboration and relationship building of working together in person, while also retaining the flexibility and progress we have made together in this virtual world.
Supporting Colleague Health, Safety and Well-Being
The health and well-being of our colleagues plays an integral role in their ability to thrive at work and at home. We take a holistic approach to well-being, providing resources that address the physical, financial and emotional health of our colleagues and their families to help them be and feel their best.
Through our award-winning health and mental well-being programs, we offer diverse healthcare plans, both on-site and virtual medical care, and 24/7 free, personal counseling. We offer a robust suite of benefits to support colleagues facing medical issues while also promoting preventive resources like free wellness coaching and livestreamed workout sessions.
We communicate regularly about the importance of health and well-being and the resources we offer. For example, on World Mental Health Day in October 2021, our Chief Colleague Experience Officer launched Note to Self, a campaign that encouraged colleagues to prioritize their mental well-being as we continue to navigate through uncertain times. We also host wellness webinars, available live and on-demand, that feature subject matter experts discussing topics like ergonomics, nutrition, stress management and caregiving during a pandemic. And to support colleagues dealing with loss, we rolled out a new Grief and Loss Support program, with one-on-one counseling from licensed therapists, as well as access to numerous articles on coping with loss.
As the world and our current landscape continues to evolve, we continue to reevalute our benefits and enhance programs to best meet the needs of our colleagues and their loved ones. During the global pandemic, our ongoing programs and new initiatives helped colleagues stay engaged and healthy while working from home and managing multiple responsibilities. In addition to flexible work schedules, caregivers can access free, expert-led virtual learning resources for children globally and colleagues in 5 of our office locations (U.S., U.K., India, Canada, and Germany) also have access to back-up child and adult/elder care. Our Healthy Living team delivered regular livestreamed workout sessions and posted workout plans and recordings, and wellness coaches introduced an ongoing Happiness Program and Virtual 5K Challenge.
Fostering Personal and Professional Growth
The growth and development of our colleagues has been and continues to be an important priority. We invest in professional development for our colleagues, including tools and guidance for maximizing learning on the job, preparing for their next career move, and development overall, professionally, and personally - as well as providing assignments across country borders and business units. All colleagues take part in our performance management process, which includes defined performance, career, and development conversations as well as year-round check-ins with their managers. We also offer career coaching, mentoring, professional networking, rotation opportunities, and both asynchronous and classroom instruction.
Our Colleague Experience Group designs and delivers a wide range of innovative learning experiences that build new skills. In addition to our internal curriculum, in 2021, we introduced LinkedIn Learning, providing quick and easy access to thousands of online courses and videos in seven languages on topics including leadership, business skills, technology, and personal development. All colleagues globally can use the platform to grow in their current role, prepare for their next career move, and develop their skills and talents.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 41 |
Our commitment to be a great place to join, stay and grow a career continues to earn us industry awards and recognition. Here are some of the recognitions from 2021 that make us proud:
◾ | Anita Borg Top Companies for Women Technologists |
◾ | Forbes Americas Best Employers for Diversityranked #24 |
◾ | Forbes Best Companies to Work for in Spain |
◾ | FORTUNE 100 Best Companies to Work Forranked #10 |
◾ | FORTUNE Best Workplaces in Financial Services & Insuranceranked #3 |
◾ | FORTUNE Best Workplaces in New Yorkranked #1 |
◾ | FORTUNE 100 Best Workplaces for Womenranked #2 |
◾ | FORTUNE Worlds Most Admired Companiesranked #20 |
◾ | Great Place to Work: Best Workplaces in Italyranked #2 |
◾ | Human Rights Campaign Corporate Equality Indexscore of 100% |
◾ | JUST CapitalJUST 100 List |
◾ | Newsweek and Statista Americas Most Responsible Companiesranked #13 |
◾ | People Companies that Careranked #48 |
◾ | Working Families Top 10 Employers in the U.K. |
◾ | Seramount 100 Best Companies |
◾ | Seramount Companies for Dads |
Learn More about Environmental, Social and Governance Matters at American Express
Please visit amex.co/ESG for our 2020-2021 ESG Report, 2021 Inaugural Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Report, TCFD Index, SASB Index, GRI Content Index and to learn more about our ESG activities. These reports, or any other information from the American Express website, are not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 42 |
Item 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Our Board recommends that you vote FOR the following resolution:
|
The Audit and Compliance Committee has sole authority to appoint and replace the Companys independent registered public accounting firm, which reports directly to the Committee, and is directly responsible for its compensation and oversight of its work. The Audit and Compliance Committee conducted its annual evaluation of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) and, after assessing the performance and independence of PwC, the Committee believes that retaining PwC is in the best interests of the Company. The Audit and Compliance Committee reappointed PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2022.
We are asking you to ratify this appointment. If shareholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit and Compliance Committee will consider it a directive to consider other accounting firms for the subsequent year. One or more representatives of PwC will be present at the meeting, will be given the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.
RESOLVED, that the appointment by the Audit and Compliance Committee of the Companys Board of Directors of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as independent registered public accounting firm for the Company, to audit the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries for 2022, is hereby ratified and approved.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 43 |
Actions Taken by the Audit and Compliance Committee to Support its Recommendation
A Detailed Assessment
|
PwC has been our independent auditor since 2005. The Audit and Compliance Committee charter requires a detailed review of the independent audit firm, including as compared to other firms, at least every 10 years. This review, conducted in 2014, assessed PwCs performance across the following criteria: professional expertise, audit engagement team performance, including the quality of information provided on accounting and auditing issues and regulatory developments, communications, independence and objectivity, and fees. In addition, the review considered the advisability and the potential impact of selecting a different independent registered public accounting firm. A wide range of internal stakeholders were surveyed and asked to comment generally, identify areas for recognition and improvement, and indicate how PwCs performance was trending over time. PwCs audit fees were benchmarked against other firms based on publicly available data. The positive results of the review resulted in the decision to continue to engage PwC and also identified several areas of opportunity for improvement that were discussed with PwC.
|
PwCs Objectivity and Independence
|
The Audit and Compliance Committee reviews relationships between PwC and American Express that may reasonably be thought to bear on independence and reviews PwCs annual independence evaluation and assesses its independence. Recognizing that independence and objectivity can be compromised by an auditors provision of non-audit services, the Audit and Compliance Committee has approved a management policy governing the provision of services by PwC.
|
Quality of PwCs Auditing Practices
|
The Audit and Compliance Committee reviews issues raised by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) reports on PwC, PwCs internal quality control procedures and results of PwCs most recent quality control reviews, as well as issues raised by recent governmental investigations, if any. The Audit and Compliance Committee also discusses PwCs quality initiatives and the steps PwC is taking to enhance the quality and efficiency of its audits with the lead engagement partner.
|
PwCs Performance as Auditor
|
The Audit and Compliance Committee discusses and comments on PwCs audit plan and strategy for the audit, including the objectives, overall scope and structure, the resources provided and available at the firm, and the Audit and Compliance Committees expectations. The Audit and Compliance Committee also receives periodic updates from the lead engagement partner on the status of the audit and areas of focus by PwC.
|
Performance of Lead Engagement Partner
|
The lead engagement partner of PwC is subject to a mandatory five-year rotation period. The Audit and Compliance Committee chair is involved in selecting the lead engagement partner. During the year, the Audit and Compliance Committee chair meets one-on-one with the lead engagement partner to promote a candid dialogue and the Audit and Compliance Committee meets in executive session with the lead engagement partner to discuss the progress of the audit and any audit issues, deliver Audit and Compliance Committee feedback and discuss any other relevant matters.
|
PwCs Communications with the Audit and Compliance Committee
|
The Audit and Compliance Committee gives feedback to the lead engagement partner on the clarity, thoroughness and timeliness of PwCs communications to the Audit and Compliance Committee.
|
Terms of the Engagement and Audit Fees
|
The Audit and Compliance Committee reviews the engagement letter and approves PwCs audit and non-audit fees.
|
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 44 |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Fees and Services
Fees for 2021 and 2020
The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or to be billed by PwC for each of the last two fiscal years (in thousands):
Types of Fees
|
2021
|
2020
|
||||||
Audit Fees |
$ |
29,003 |
|
$ |
27,256 |
| ||
Audit-Related Fees(1) |
|
2,757 |
|
|
2,778 |
| ||
Tax Fees |
|
1,200 |
|
|
426 |
| ||
All Other Fees |
|
59 |
|
|
104 |
| ||
TOTAL |
$ |
33,019 |
|
$ |
30,564 |
|
(1) | PwC performs the audit of the Companys pension plan for Hong Kong (and previously for Switzerland, which plan has since been liquidated) where the fees are paid by the plan. These fees, which totaled $16K and $26K in 2021 and 2020, respectively, are not included in Audit-Related Fees since they were not paid by the Company. |
In the table above, in accordance with SEC rules, Audit Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the integrated audit of our consolidated financial statements, review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports, and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements and other attest services. Audit-Related Fees consist of fees for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements. The services included due diligence, internal control reviews, attest services not required by statute or regulation and attest services for non-financial information, consultations on financial accounting and reporting matters not classified as audit and, in 2020, also included employee benefit plan audits. Tax Fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance and tax consulting services. All Other Fees are fees for any services not included in the first three categories.
Policy on Pre-Approval of Services Provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
The terms of our engagement of PwC are subject to the pre-approval of the Audit and Compliance Committee. All audit and permitted non-audit services require pre-approval by the Audit and Compliance Committee in accordance with pre-approval procedures established by the Audit and Compliance Committee. In accordance with SEC rules, the Audit and Compliance Committees pre-approval procedures have two different approaches to pre-approving audit and permitted non-audit services performed by PwC.
The Audit and Compliance Committee specifically pre-approves the terms and fees of the planned annual audit and permitted non-audit services that are to be performed by PwC. Other proposed engagements may be pre-approved up to an aggregate fee threshold, pursuant to procedures established by the Audit and Compliance Committee that are detailed as to the particular and defined classes of services without consideration by the Audit and Compliance Committee of the specific case-by-case services to be performed. We refer to this pre-approval method as general pre-approval and the Companys Controller reports such pre-approved engagements to the Audit and Compliance Committee at least quarterly.
The procedures also require all proposed engagements of PwC for services of any kind that have not received specific or general pre-approval as described above to be approved by the Audit and Compliance Committee (or, should a time-sensitive need arise, its Chair) prior to the beginning of any such services. All services provided by our independent registered public accounting firm have been pre-approved in accordance with these procedures. The Audit and Compliance Committee has reviewed the services performed by PwC and the related fees were consistent with the maintenance of PwCs independence.
Other Transactions with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
We have a number of business relationships with individual member firms of the worldwide PwC organization. Our subsidiaries provide card services to some of these firms and these firms pay fees to our subsidiaries. These services are in the normal course of business, and we provide them pursuant to arrangements that we offer to other similar clients.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 45 |
Report of the Audit and Compliance Committee
A role of the Audit and Compliance Committee is to assist the Board in its oversight of the Companys financial reporting process. Management has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal control over financial reporting. PwC is responsible for auditing the Companys financial statements and its internal control over financial reporting, in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, and expressing opinions as to the conformity of the financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit and Compliance Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and PwC the Companys audited financial statements. The Audit and Compliance Committee also has discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC. In addition, the Audit and Compliance Committee has received from PwC the written disclosures and letters required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding PwCs communications with the audit committee concerning independence, has discussed with PwC their independence from the Company and its management, and has considered whether PwCs provision of non-audit services to the Company is compatible with maintaining the firms independence.
The Audit and Compliance Committee discussed with the Companys Chief Audit Executive and PwC the overall scope and plan for their respective audits. Internal Audit is responsible for preparing an annual audit plan and conducting internal audits under the direction of the Companys Chief Audit Executive, who is accountable to the Audit and Compliance Committee. The Audit and Compliance Committee met with the Chief Audit Executive, the Controller and PwC, with and without management present, to discuss the results of their examinations, their evaluations of the Companys internal controls, and the overall quality of the Companys financial reporting. In addition, the Audit and Compliance Committee met with management to discuss the processes that they have undertaken to evaluate the accuracy and fair presentation of the Companys financial statements and the effectiveness of the Companys systems of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting.
Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit and Compliance Committee recommended to the Board that the Companys audited financial statements be included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 for filing with the SEC.
AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE
Ralph de la Vega (Chair)
Thomas J. Baltimore
John J. Brennan
Michael O. Leavitt
Karen L. Parkhill
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 46 |
Item 3: Advisory Resolution to Approve Executive Compensation (Say-on-Pay)
The Board recommends a vote FOR this item.
|
Pursuant to regulations under Schedule 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are asking you to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Companys Named Executive Officers (NEOs) disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), the compensation tables, notes and narrative in this Proxy Statement.
Our Board believes that the compensation of our executive officers is aligned with performance, is sensitive to our share price and appropriately motivates and retains our executives. We believe our executive compensation program delivers pay that is strongly linked to Company performance over time.
We engage with shareholders throughout the year, including discussing our compensation program and practices, and we also obtain feedback through this annual say-on-pay vote. Although this advisory vote is non-binding, the results of this vote and the views expressed by our shareholders in these discussions will inform the Compensation and Benefits Committees future decisions about our executive compensation.
RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Companys NEOs, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including in the CD&A, compensation tables, notes and narrative discussion, is hereby approved.
Section Table of Contents
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 47 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Our CD&A describes our executive compensation programs and compensation decisions for our NEOs, who for 2021 were:
Stephen J. Squeri Chairman and CEO
|
Stephen J. Squeri is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of American Express Company. Since being named to this role in February of 2018, Steve has built a culture focused on backing customers, colleagues and communities and has evolved the companys operating model through an enterprise-wide strategy focused on delivering sustainable, long-term growth. Under his leadership, American Express has launched innovative payments, financial management and lifestyle offerings for consumers and businesses, expanded strategic partnerships, enhanced digital capabilities, reshaped the Companys strategy to drive growth in international markets and became the first foreign payments network to receive a clearing license in mainland China. Additionally, Steve spearheaded the development of the companys ESG framework and established the Office of Enterprise Inclusion, Diversity and Business Engagement. In his previous role as Vice Chairman, Steve led the companys Global Commercial Services group, as well as its shared services groups. Steve joined American Express in 1985 as a manager in the Travellers Cheque Group. From 2000 to 2002, he served as President of the Establishment Services group in the U.S. and Canada, and he was President of the Corporate Card group from 2002 to 2005, during which time he globalized the business. Steve became the companys Chief Information Officer in 2005 and also led the Corporate Development function, overseeing mergers and acquisitions. In 2009, Steve was named Group President and led the formation of the Global Services Group, consolidating and globalizing the companys shared services functions.
Jeffrey C. Campbell Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
|
Jeff Campbell serves as Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of American Express, overseeing the companys financial operations worldwide. As a member of the Executive Committee and an officer of the company appointed to Vice Chairman in April 2021, Jeff plays an important role in developing the strategic direction for American Express and represents the company to the financial community. Before joining American Express in 2013, Jeff was CFO of the McKesson Corporation, the largest healthcare services company in the United States. He played an essential role as McKesson grew significantly and expanded its leadership in healthcare distribution and technology. Previously, Jeff spent 13 years at AMR Corp. and its principal subsidiary, American Airlines, ultimately becoming their CFO in 2002.
Douglas E. Buckminster Vice Chairman and Group President, Global Consumer Services Group
|
Doug Buckminster is Vice Chairman and Group President, Global Consumer Services Group of American Express. As a member of the Executive Committee, appointed to Vice Chairman in April 2021, Doug leads the ongoing evolution of the companys global consumer business, and Enterprise Innovation Partners, which is responsible for digital incubation, strategic partnerships, and corporate development. He also plays a central role in driving the overall strategic direction of the company and accelerating growth opportunities globally. Doug previously served as Group President of Global Consumer Services responsible for consumer products and services, digital strategy and capabilities, and risk and information management; President, Global Network & International Card Services responsible for growing the consumer and bank partnership businesses in more than 150 countries; and President, International Consumer and Small Business Services. Doug has also served as regional president for American Express Internationals Latin America, Canada, and Caribbean (LACC) region, and general manager of the International Lending and Insurance Services organizations.
Anré D. Williams
|
Group President, Enterprise Services and CEO American Express National Bank
|
Anré Williams is Group President, Enterprise Services and Chief Executive Officer of American Express National Bank (AENB), a role he assumed in April 2021. As Group President of Enterprise Services, Anré is a member of the American Express Executive Committee and leads American Express largest shared services organizations that support the company globally, including its technology, digital capabilities, customer servicing, consumer travel, real estate, purchasing and enterprise transformation functions. The organizations he oversees comprise approximately two-thirds of the companys total workforce. In addition, as CEO of AENB, Anré oversees all aspects of American Express U.S. banking operation, which is responsible for over 60 percent of the companys total billings and revenues. Previously, he was Group President of American Express Global Merchant & Network Services (GMNS) organization responsible for managing relationships with the millions of merchants around the world that accept American Express Cards, as well as the companys payments network, bank partnerships, international loyalty coalition programs, and relationships with its largest strategic partners.
Laureen E. Seeger Chief Legal Officer
|
Laureen E. Seeger is Chief Legal Officer of American Express Company, a position she assumed in July 2014. As a member of the Executive Committee, she oversees the Law, Government Affairs, Global Security and Corporate Secretarial functions for American Express and its subsidiaries. She is also a member of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee. Prior to American Express, Laureen served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer of McKesson Corporation. Preceding her appointment in March 2006, she was Vice President and General Counsel of McKesson Provider Technologies (MPT), McKessons health care information technology solutions business. Before joining McKesson, Laureen was Partner-In-Charge of the Technology Litigation Section at the law firm Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 48 |
Section 1: Compensation Governance and Pay Principles
The Companys executive compensation program is overseen by the Compensation and Benefits Committee with the advice and support of the Companys independent compensation consultant as well as the Companys management team. The following are key characteristics of the Companys executive compensation program, which we believe best serve the interests of our shareholders and promote good governance.
WHAT WE DO
Our programs and practices continue to:
|
||||
WHAT WE DONT DO
Our programs and practices do not:
|
We believe our executive compensation program is thoughtful, consistent and continues to align with the Companys business strategies.
◾ | We align pay with Company performance and to support a long-term, high-performance business model. |
◾ | We link the majority of pay for senior executives to long-term business strategies and key priorities. The CEOs pay has added emphasis on performance-based incentives (95% of CEOs pay) with a substantial stockholding requirement. |
◾ | We measure performance against challenging goals, including effective risk management, established at the start of each performance cycle that are aligned with our key business priorities. |
◾ | We discourage imprudent risk taking by avoiding undue emphasis on any one metric or short-term goal. |
We continue to review our pay principles with input from shareholders and regulators, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 49 |
The Compensation and Benefits Committee values the input of our shareholders and regularly engages with them on executive compensation matters to foster a constructive dialogue on the programs and decision-making process. The Compensation and Benefits Committee considers the long-term interests of the Company and our shareholders when making decisions regarding our compensation program.
|
|
Shareholder Engagement and Responsiveness to the 2021 Say-On-Pay Vote
We have a longstanding practice of engaging with our shareholders throughout the year on executive compensation matters and taking appropriate action considering feedback received.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 50 |
Section 2: Company Performance Summary
Our results for 2021 reflect the growth momentum we saw in our core business throughout the year as well as continued strong credit performance. After an unprecedented year in 2020 with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2021 we focused on rebuilding our growth momentum by supporting our colleagues and winning as a team, firing up the core business, scaling next horizon opportunities, retaining financial flexibility, and making progress on ESG initiatives. Through the successful execution of our investment strategy, and as certain pandemic-related restrictions were lifted and macroeconomic conditions improved, we saw key areas of our business grow beyond pre-pandemic (2019) levels. For 2021, the Compensation and Benefit Committee determined the Companys overall performance to be above the target levels established in the Companys annual performance scorecard and took this into consideration in determining annual incentives for 2021 (see pages 54-56 for additional details).
(1) | FX-adjusted information assumes a constant exchange rate between the periods being compared for purposes of currency translation into U.S. dollars (i.e., assumes 2021 foreign exchange rates apply to 2020 results, 2020 foreign exchange rates apply to 2019 results). Total revenues net of interest expense on an FX-adjusted basis is a non-GAAP measure. Management believes the presentation of information on an FX-adjusted basis is helpful to investors by making it easier to compare the Companys performance in one period to that of another period without the variability caused by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. |
(2) | Return on equity (ROE) is calculated for the relevant periods by dividing the (i) preceding twelve months of net income ($8.1 billion, $3.1 billion and $6.8 billion for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively) by (ii) one-year monthly average of total shareholders equity ($23.9 billion, $22.0 billion and $22.8 billion for 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively). |
(3) | Diluted Earnings per share represents net income, less (i) earnings allocated to participating share awards of $56 million, $20 million and $47 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, (ii) dividends on preferred shares of $71 million, $79 million and $81 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and (iii) equity-related adjustments of $16 million related to the redemption of preferred shares for the year ended December 31, 2021. |
(4) | Adjusted Diluted Earnings per share, excluding the impacts of a litigation-related charge in the first quarter of 2019, is a non-GAAP measure. Management believes adjusted diluted EPS is useful in evaluating the ongoing operating performance of the Company. See Annex A for a reconciliation to diluted EPS on a GAAP basis. |
(5) | TSR is the total return on common shares over a specified period, expressed as a percentage (calculated based on the change in stock price over the relevant measurement period and assuming reinvestment of dividends). Source: Bloomberg. Calculated as of December 31, 2021. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 51 |
The CEOs 2021 total direct compensation decision is consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy and focuses on variable and at-risk compensation that is closely aligned with Company performance and sensitive to the Companys stock performance. The chart below shows that 95% of the CEOs 2021 compensation is performance-based with a significant portion (67%) tied to the future performance of the Company.
The CEOs compensation shown below reflects the target direct compensation for 2021 that was set at the start of 2021 as well as the Compensation and Benefits Committees compensation decision in January 2022 which took into consideration 2021 performance and external market data provided by the Compensation and Benefits Committees independent compensation consultant.
As shown below, 2021 actual compensation of $28.5 million is 39% above the 2021 target of $20.5 million and 43% above 2020 actual compensation of $19.96 million.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 52 |
Section 3: Compensation Programs
The following table summarizes the key elements of our executive compensation program and demonstrates the programs focus on annual and long-term incentive compensation that is closely aligned with Company performance and is sensitive to the Companys stock performance. The Compensation and Benefits Committee periodically reviews executive compensation and may recommend adjustments driven by market data, performance and situations where there is a change in responsibility:
Form of Payment
|
Performance Period |
Description of Award
|
For More Information | |||||
Base Salary |
Cash | Ongoing |
◾ The fixed portion of total direct compensation
|
Page 53 | ||||
Annual |
Cash | One year |
◾ Annual cash-denominated performance-based component of executive compensation, designed to recognize Company performance and individual performance
◾ Linked to financial and non-financial goals approved annually by the Compensation and Benefits Committee
|
Pages 53-56 | ||||
Long-Term |
80% Performance
|
Three years |
◾ Align incentives with shareholder interests and the Companys long-term financial objectives
◾ Granted annually with a 3-year cliff vesting period
◾ Vesting of awards contingent on relative ROE and relative TSR performance versus a set of performance peers
◾ Dividends are accrued on the target number of shares and are paid out after vesting
|
Pages 56-57 | ||||
20% Stock Options (SOs)
|
Three years |
◾ Align compensation earned with value shareholders receive over the same period of time
◾ Granted annually with a 3-year cliff vesting and 10-year total term
◾ Awards vest subject to positive cumulative net income over the 3-year performance period
|
Pages 56-57 |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 53 |
Base salary is the fixed portion of total direct compensation for our executive officers, including the NEOs. The Compensation and Benefits Committee periodically reviews salaries as part of total compensation reviews.
The AIA is structured to reflect specific and measurable Company goals, approved by the Compensation and Benefits Committee at the beginning of the year, including key objectives in four categories: Shareholder, Customer, Colleague and Strategic. The Committee believes each performance metric is a key driver of Company performance and aligns with the Companys focus on continued long-term value creation.
The Committee uses the same Company Scorecard to determine annual incentives for all executives to promote an enterprise-wide focus. The Company Scorecard is based on the following metrics:
The AIA is a formulaic program that considers Company goals set at the beginning of the fiscal year, along with individual performance, to determine the final payout. The design works as follows for each NEO:
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 54 |
2021 Annual Incentive Awards
2021 Performance Multiplier Company
The Compensation and Benefits Committee evaluated the following results against the performance objectives approved for all NEOs at the beginning of 2021. Financial goals approved at the start of the year were consistent with the full-year scenario that was informed by macroeconomic assumptions provided publicly in January 2021. For each metric, the goals represent a measurement for a range of outcomes that could result in a higher or lower payout. AIA payouts for 2021 performance occurred in February 2022.
Based on the Companys overall performance in 2021 across Shareholder, Customer, Colleague and Strategic, the Compensation and Benefits Committee determined the 2021 Company Performance Multiplier to be above target at 150%. In order to reinforce the importance of risk management and control performance and, in accordance with discouraging imprudent risk-taking, the Committee approved a negative risk adjustment resulting in a Company Performance Multiplier of 145% for executive officers, including NEOs.
The following table provides details of Company performance in 2021, relative to the goals:
Shareholder (50%) | 2021 Target | 2021 Actual Performance | 2020 Actual Performance | |||||||||
◾ Revenue Growth(1) |
9% | 17% | (17% | ) | ||||||||
◾ EPS |
$5.25 | $10.02 | $3.77 | |||||||||
◾ ROE |
18% | 34% | 14% | |||||||||
Customer (15%) |
|
|
|
|||||||||
◾ Net Promoter Score |
Goal achieved above target level | |||||||||||
◾ Retention |
Maintained retention rates above pre-pandemic (2019) levels | |||||||||||
◾ Merchant Locations |
|
Sustained virtual parity coverage in the U.S.(2), and continued to grow coverage internationally, adding over 7 million merchant locations outside of the U.S. |
|
Colleague (15%) |
|
|
|
|||||
A set of quantitative talent metrics in the following three categories (see ESG and DE&I reports for more details):
◾ Diversity Representation (Increasing underrepresented U.S. minority and global women representation across the Company, especially at senior managerial levels) |
Goals achieved at or above target levels |
|||||||
◾ Talent Retention (Retaining our critical talent at all levels) |
||||||||
◾ Culture (Maintaining a strong level of inclusion and engagement) |
(1) | FX-adjusted information assumes a constant exchange rate between the periods being compared for purposes of currency translation into U.S. dollars (i.e., assumes 2021 foreign exchange rates apply to 2020 results). Total revenues net of interest expense on an FX-adjusted basis is a non-GAAP measure. Management believes the presentation of information on an FX-adjusted basis is helpful to investors by making it easier to compare the Companys performance in one period to that of another period without the variability caused by fluctuations in currency exchange rates. |
(2) | Source: AXP internal data and The Nilson Report, February 2022. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 55 |
Strategic (20%) | 2021 Results | |
Support our colleagues and win as a team |
| |
Fire up the core business |
| |
Scale next horizon opportunities |
| |
Invest for long-term growth while retaining financial flexibility |
| |
Continue to increase ESG disclosure and progress on key ESG metrics |
|
Performance Multiplier Individual
The Compensation and Benefits Committee has discretion to modify awards downward or upward to differentiate and reward leadership performance. Factors considered in determining the appropriate individual multiplier for the NEOs included the assessment of risk taking, risk management, and performance against the Companys leadership behaviors (Setting the Agenda, Bringing Others With You and Doing It the Right Way). The maximum individual performance multiplier for leadership performance is 125%.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 56 |
Summary of NEOs AIA for 2021
The following table summarizes the actual AIA paid to each NEO for the 2021 performance year (in thousands).
Name | Target AIA | x | Company Multiplier | x | Individual Multiplier | = | Actual AIA* | |||||||
S.J. Squeri |
$4,500 |
|
145% |
|
123% |
|
$8,000 | |||||||
J.C. Campbell |
$3,700 |
|
145% |
|
125% |
|
$6,700 | |||||||
D.E. Buckminster |
$4,000 |
|
145% |
|
125% |
|
$7,250 | |||||||
A.D. Williams |
$3,604 |
|
145% |
|
120% |
|
$6,275 | |||||||
L.E. Seeger |
$2,850 |
|
145% |
|
121% |
|
$5,000 |
* | To comply with regulatory guidance that at least 50% of incentive compensation is deferred, Messrs. Campbell, Buckminster, and Williams and Ms. Seeger had a portion of their 2021 AIA paid in the form of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs). These RSUs were granted in January 2022 and are deferred for three years from the grant date, subject to positive cumulative net income but not to continued employment. The AIA figures in the above table do not reflect this adjustment. |
Long-Term Incentive Award (LTIA)
Our LTIA aligns NEOs interests with those of shareholders and establishes retention incentives through multi-year, performance-based vesting periods. The elements of the Companys LTIA and their respective features are described in the table below:
Element |
Key Metrics | Features | ||
Performance Restricted Stock Units (80% of award)
|
◾ 3-year average ROE as compared to performance peers ◾ 3-year TSR compared to the same performance peers as ROE
|
◾ 3-year cliff vesting period ◾ Payout tied to 3-year relative performance and stock price performance ◾ 0-120% of target shares awarded
| ||
Stock Options (20% of award) |
◾ Positive cumulative net income |
◾ 3-year cliff vesting period ◾ Vests subject to positive cumulative net income over the 3-year performance period ◾ 10-year term
|
Summary of 2021 NEO LTIA Awards (Granted in January 2022)
Based on Company and individual performance in 2021, the Compensation and Benefits Committee granted the following long-term incentive awards in January 2022. The payouts of these awards are dependent on the achievement of the metrics described above. The award amount for each NEO is as follows (in thousands):
S.J. Squeri
|
J.C. Campbell
|
D.E. Buckminster
|
A.D. Williams
|
L.E. Seeger
|
||||||||||||||||
Performance Restricted Stock Units |
$ | 15,200 | $ | 5,040 | $ | 5,520 | $ | 4,640 | $ | 3,760 | ||||||||||
Stock Options |
$ | 3,800 | $ | 1,260 | $ | 1,380 | $ | 1,160 | $ | 940 | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 19,000 | $ | 6,300 | $ | 6,900 | $ | 5,800 | $ | 4,700 |
Not included in this table is any 2021 AIA paid in the form of RSUs granted in January 2022 to comply with regulatory guidance that at least 50% of incentive compensation is deferred.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 57 |
Performance Restricted Stock Units
As a financial institution with a lending book and fee income, we consider effective returns on capital to be a validation of high performance. The program requires top-quartile relative Return On Equity (ROE) for Performance Restricted Stock Units to pay out at target, and above target payouts are contingent on Total Shareholder Return (TSR) performance being in the top third of our peer group regardless of our ROE performance. Median relative ROE performance results in an 80% payout.
AXP Relative ROE Performance(1)
|
Payout %(2)
|
AXP Relative TSR Performance(1)
|
Payout %
|
|||||||||
≥90th percentile |
120% | & | 67th Percentile or better of LTIA Performance Peer Group |
|
Up to 120% |
| ||||||
75th percentile |
100% | |||||||||||
50th percentile |
80% | < 67th Percentile of LTIA Performance Peer Group |
|
Cap at 100% |
| |||||||
25th percentile |
50% | |||||||||||
<25th percentile |
0% |
(1) | Relative to the LTIA Performance Peer Group |
(2) | Straight-line interpolation applies if performance is between two points. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 58 |
Section 4: Compensation Determination Process
Annual Compensation and Decision-Making Process
Our Compensation and Benefits Committee is responsible for assisting the Board of Directors in its oversight responsibilities related to executive compensation programs, including determining the payouts for the last completed fiscal year and setting the annual performance goals for the upcoming performance cycle for each of our executive officers including the CEO. Typically, the Committee follows the key activities outlined below:
Our pay program is designed to reward achievement of financial and strategic goals and to attract, retain and motivate our leaders in a competitive talent market. The Compensation and Benefits Committee periodically examines pay practices and pay data for a Compensation Peer Group of 20 companies as a source of benchmarking data to better understand the competitiveness of our compensation program and its various elements. While the benchmarking data is used to assess the competitiveness of our compensation program, it is only one of a number of factors used to make final pay decisions. The Compensation Peer Group is different than our LTIA Performance Peer group which is selected for industry and financial metric comparability to assess our relative financial performance in determining potential LTIA payouts.
How We Select the Companys Compensation Peer Group
In selecting the current compensation peer group, the Compensation and Benefits Committee identified prominent S&P 500 companies, with revenue levels similar to ours, in the following categories: (1) financial institutions; (2) iconic global consumer brands; and (3) payments and technology businesses. In 2021, the Committee, together with its independent compensation consultant, reviewed current peer and non-peer companies and concluded that no changes were necessary to the compensation peer group.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 59 |
Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant
The Compensation and Benefits Committee is composed solely of independent directors. The Committee is responsible for approving our executive officer compensation decisions. It has retained Semler Brossy Consulting Group (Semler Brossy) as its independent compensation consultant. The Committee held six meetings over the course of 2021, all of which ended with executive sessions without management present. During 2021, Semler Brossy attended Compensation and Benefits Committee and American Express National Bank Board meetings, including executive sessions, and provided compensation advice independent of the Companys management. Semler Brossy does not engage in other work for the Company. The Committee assessed the independence of Semler Brossy pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that their work did not raise any conflicts of interest.
2022 Annual Target Direct Compensation
The Compensation and Benefits Committee reviews target direct compensation each year. For 2022, the Committee approved increases to target compensation levels for all NEOs. In approving compensation adjustments, the Committee took into consideration the significant role and responsibility changes for Messrs. Campbell, Buckminster and Williams as well as other key factors including Company growth, sustained strong Company and individual performance, and external market movements. The Committee took into account market benchmarks and perspectives on market pay levels as provided by its independent compensation consultant.
All compensation components except base salary are performance based (in thousands):
S.J. Squeri
|
J.C. Campbell
|
D.E. Buckminster
|
A.D. Williams
|
L.E. Seeger
|
||||||||||||||||
Base Salary |
$ | 1,500 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 1,100 | $ | 1,000 | $ | 875 | ||||||||||
AIA(1) |
$ | 5,500 | $ | 3,700 | $ | 4,000 | $ | 3,700 | $ | 2,925 | ||||||||||
Performance Restricted Stock Units(2) |
$ | 15,200 | $ | 5,040 | $ | 5,520 | $ | 4,640 | $ | 3,760 | ||||||||||
Stock Options(3) |
$ | 3,800 | $ | 1,260 | $ | 1,380 | $ | 1,160 | $ | 940 | ||||||||||
Total Target Direct Compensation |
$ | 26,000 | $ | 11,000 | $ | 12,000 | $ | 10,500 | $ | 8,500 |
(1) | Actual AIA payout will be based on Company and individual performance in 2022 considering performance against pre-established goals. |
(2) | Performance Restricted Stock Units cliff vest after three years based on relative ROE and relative TSR performance over the three-year period. |
(3) | Stock Options cliff vest 100% after three years based on positive cumulative net income. |
Settlement of Performance RSUs Awarded in January 2019
In 2019, as a result of shareholder feedback and to further align with managements business objectives and shareholder-based results, the Company redesigned its Performance RSU program to reward based on an assessment of three-year ROE and TSR performance relative to a defined set of Performance Peers. The revised program requires top quartile relative ROE performance to vest at target, and top third relative TSR performance for above-target vesting.
The first awards under this new plan were granted in January 2019 and vested at target (100%) in January 2022 based on the Companys relative ROE positioning (91st percentile) and TSR positioning (43rd percentile) for the three-year (2019-2021) performance period ending on December 31, 2021.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 60 |
Section 5: Compensation Policies and Practices
Discouraging Imprudent Risk Taking
Our executive compensation program is:
![]() |
Structured to provide a balance of cash and stock; annual and long-term incentives; and varied performance measures over different time horizons; |
![]() |
Designed to encourage the proper level of risk taking consistent with our business model and strategies; and |
![]() |
Designed to be consistent with regulatory principles for safety and soundness. |
The following policies and procedures help discourage imprudent risk taking:
Discouraging Imprudent Risk Taking
Cross-Section of Metrics |
We assess Company performance against a cross-section of key metrics and over multiple time frames to discourage undue focus on short-term results or on any one metric and to reinforce risk balancing in performance measurement. Our incentive plans are not overly leveraged (i.e., there is a cap on the maximum payout). | |
Annual Risk Goals |
Our Chief Risk Officer reviews goals for safety and soundness in relation to the Companys risk appetite and sets certain annual risk goals for the Company at the beginning of each year. | |
Monitoring of Risk |
We monitor relevant metrics, including credit risk and market risk metrics, performance against our risk appetite thresholds as well as material operational risk events on a regular basis. We assign control and compliance ratings to each business unit as part of our annual assessment of performance. | |
Adjustment of Compensation |
At year-end, our Chief Risk Officer meets with the Compensation and Benefits Committee and certifies as to whether actual results were achieved with proper risk governance and oversight, and whether the Company executed on its broad range of programs that help to avoid imprudent risk taking. The Chief Risk Officer issues a year-end memorandum summarizing an overall assessment of the Companys risk profile. If deemed necessary, risk adjustments are made to Company annual incentive funding levels as well as to individual incentive awards. | |
Deferred Incentive Compensation |
At least 50% of total incentive compensation for executive officers is deferred for at least three years with performance-based payout. | |
Performance Based Vesting |
Performance Restricted Stock Units are used in place of time-based RSUs for the Companys senior colleagues. | |
Stock Ownership Requirements |
We have robust stock ownership requirements for our CEO and other NEOs (as described below). |
Our current stock ownership guidelines require the CEO and our other NEOs to own and maintain a substantial stake in the Company. The CEO and our other NEOs are required to accumulate shares (i.e., shares owned outright, excluding unvested/unearned shares and unexercised stock options) with a value equivalent to a target multiple of their base salary, and to retain 50% of the net after-tax shares received upon vesting or exercise of their equity awards until guidelines are met. The specific requirements are as follows:
As of December 31, 2021, all of our NEOs own more than their required target number of shares.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 61 |
Clawback and Recoupment Policies
We seek to recover, to the extent practicable, performance-based compensation from any executive officer and certain other members of senior management under certain circumstances. The Company has two arrangements to clawback or cancel awards:
◾ | Detrimental Conduct Agreement |
◾ | Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy |
The table below outlines our policies:
Detrimental Conduct Agreement | Incentive Compensation Recoupment Policy | |||
WHO |
Approximately 1,500 colleagues at Vice President level and above (including CEO) | All colleagues | ||
WHEN |
Colleague engages in detrimental conduct: ◾ Working for a competitor (applies to approximately 500 colleagues) ◾ Soliciting American Express colleagues or customers ◾ Denigrating the Company in the media ◾ Engaging in certain misconduct that leads to termination ◾ Other detrimental conduct categories (e.g., sharing confidential information) |
AXP financial results are restated: ◾ Colleagues engaged in fraud or misconduct that caused or partially caused the need for the restatement; and ◾ Less compensation would have been paid to the colleagues based upon the restated financial results | ||
WHAT |
Forfeit unvested equity awards and repay proceeds from Incentive Compensation Plan awards (including annual incentives for executive officers) that vested in the last two years and dividends paid on restricted stock | Company will seek to recover the difference between the amount actually paid and what should have been paid based on the restated financial results |
In addition, the cash portion of the CEOs AIA is subject to recoupment at the discretion of the Compensation and Benefits Committee if the Company does not achieve acceptable performance in the following year.
We provide limited perquisites to support our objective to attract and retain talent for key positions, as well as to address security concerns. For the CEO, the Companys security policy requires him to use, for all travel purposes, to the maximum extent practicable, the automobiles and aircraft provided by the Company for business travel. Our NEOs are also eligible to receive certain benefits available to all other colleagues with a corporate card including Membership Reward points which are available for personal use. In 2022, the Company eliminated the annual cash perquisite allowance of $35,000 that was previously provided to executive officers of the Company, including NEOs.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 62 |
RETIREMENT BENEFITS
NEOs receive retirement benefits through the following plans:
◾ | Retirement Savings Plan (RSP): A qualified 401(k) savings plan available to all eligible U.S. colleagues. |
◾ | Retirement Restoration Plan (RRP): A U.S. non-qualified savings plan that makes up for 401(k) benefits that would otherwise be lost as a result of contribution limits for qualified plans under U.S. law. |
◾ | Deferral Plan: Allows U.S. NEOs to defer a portion of their base salary and AIA payout. The annual deferral limit is equal to one times the NEOs base salary. |
NEO retirement benefits are more fully described under Retirement Plan Benefits on page 70 and under Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation on pages 71-72.
SEVERANCE: SENIOR EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE POLICY
The Compensation and Benefits Committee must pre-approve severance for the Companys executive officers. Under the Senior Executive Severance Policy, NEOs who are terminated involuntarily (except in cases of misconduct) receive cash severance benefits equal to one and one half years of base salary and target AIA. The Company also provides pro rata AIA payment for the year of termination. LTIA continues to vest and certain benefits continue during the severance period, unless the executive begins full-time, outside employment. U.S.-based NEOs who are age 65 or older are not eligible for severance, unless the Compensation and Benefits Committee specifically approves severance for such an executive.
To protect shareholders and our business model, executives are required to comply with non-compete, non-solicitation, confidentiality and non-denigration provisions during the period of time they are receiving severance. Our uniform severance policy helps to avoid special treatment and provides an important enforcement mechanism for these protections.
Tax rules generally limit the deductibility of compensation paid to our NEOs to $1 million per year. The Compensation and Benefits Committee maintains the flexibility to pay nondeductible incentive compensation.
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 63 |
Section 6: Report of the Compensation and Benefits Committee
The Compensation and Benefits Committee has reviewed and discussed the CD&A with management. Based on its review and discussion, it recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the CD&A in this Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS COMMITTEE*
John J. Brennan, Chair Peter Chernin Ralph de la Vega Theodore J. Leonsis |
Lynn A. Pike Daniel L. Vasella Ronald A. Williams |
* | Reflects 2021 Compensation and Benefits Committee membership |
Note Regarding 2021 Total Direct Compensation Decisions and Summary Compensation Table
It is important to recognize that the way the Compensation and Benefits Committee presents total direct compensation is different from the SEC-required disclosure in the Summary Compensation Table on the following page and is not a substitute for the information in that table.
In summary, the main difference between the Summary Compensation Table and total direct compensation is the timing of disclosure related to equity awards. The chart below details this methodology.
|
|
Summary Compensation Table** | Total Direct Compensation | |||
Concept and Purpose | Uses SEC methodology, which includes a mix of both cash compensation actually earned during 2021 and estimated value of equity granted in 2021
SEC-mandated compensation disclosure |
Includes only pay that is awarded based on 2021 performance reflects the Compensation and Benefits Committees January 2022 compensation decisions | ||||
Calculated as a sum of: | Base salary | ◾Base salary paid in 2021 |
◾Base salary set for 2021 | |||
Annual bonus | ◾Annual cash bonus earned for 2021 performance, excluding any incentive deferred into RSUs |
◾Total annual bonus (AIA) awarded for 2021 performance, regardless of form of payment (i.e., cash or equity) | ||||
Equity awards | ◾Accounting value of equity awards (Performance Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options) granted in 2021 |
◾Grant date value of equity awards (Performance Restricted Stock Units and Stock Options) granted in January 2022 for performance year ending 2021 |
** | The SEC rules also require disclosure of additional elements of compensation beyond the ones mentioned in this table, such as future pay opportunities for pension benefits, above market interest rate on deferred compensation and all other compensation. |
2022 PROXY STATEMENT | 64 |
The following Summary Compensation Table summarizes the compensation of our NEOs for the year ended December 31, 2021, using the SEC-required disclosure rules. It is important to recognize that 2021 total direct compensation determined by the Compensation and Benefits Committee is different than the amounts disclosed below. See page 63 for key differences between the Summary Compensation Table and total direct compensation awarded by the Compensation and Benefits Committee for 2021 Performance.
Name and Principal Position
|
Year
|
Salary
|
Bonus(1)
|
Stock
|
Option
|
Non-Equity
|
Change in Value
|
All
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
S.J. Squeri |
2021 | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 8,000,000 | $ | 12,549,027 | $ | 2,899,974 | N/A | $ | 16,429 | $ | 548,492 | $ | 25,513,922 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chairman and CEO |
2020 | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 3,960,000 | $ | 13,016,122 | $ | 2,899,986 | $ | 2,322,000 | $ | 64,575 | $ | 458,636 | $ | 24,221,319 | |||||||||||||||||||
2019 | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 7,000,000 | $ | 10,318,663 | $ | 2,439,992 | $ | 1,875,000 | $ | 83,985 | $ | 578,362 | $ | 23,796,002 | ||||||||||||||||||||
J.C. Campbell |
2021 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 6,500,000 | $ | 4,586,779 | $ | 1,059,973 | N/A | N/A | $ | 206,880 | $ | 13,353,632 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer
|
2020 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 3,285,000 | $ | 4,857,541 | $ | 1,059,986 | $ | 1,290,000 | N/A | $ | 206,880 | $ | 11,699,407 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2019 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | 5,300,000 | $ | 4,405,932 | $ | 899,979 | $ | 1,875,000 | N/A | $ | 264,580 | $ | 13,745,491 | |||||||||||||||||||||
D.E. Buckminster |
2021 | $ | 1,100,000 | $ | 7,075,000 | $ | 5,106,092 | $ | 1,179,977 | N/A | $ | 8,249 | $ | 264,357 | $ | 14,733,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Vice Chairman and Group President, Global Consumer Services Group
|
2020 | $ | 1,083,333 | $ | 3,600,000 | $ | 5,296,166 | $ | 1,179,992 | $ | 1,118,000 | $ | 54,684 | $ | 232,212 | $ | 12,564,387 | |||||||||||||||||||
2019 | $ | 983,333 | $ | 5,700,000 | $ | 4,059,749 | $ | 959,993 | $ | 1,625,000 | $ | 68,497 | $ | 274,100 | $ | 13,670,672 | ||||||||||||||||||||
A.D. Williams |
2021 | $ | 951,634 |