PART I

Patrice Jean is a member of our Board of Directors and is chairperson of the Audit and Finance Committee. Dr. Jean is the Chair of the Life Sciences Practice at Hughes Hubbard & Reed, an international law firm based in New York City. She has over a decade of experience counselling leading and startup pharmaceutical, chemical and biotechnology companies in all areas of intellectual property law, including asserting and defending patent rights underlying core technologies and innovations. Dr. Jean serves as Vice President of the New York Intellectual Property Law Education Foundation and is a Board member of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association. Dr. Jean holds a Ph.D. in molecular biology from Princeton University, a J.D. from Columbia University School of Law, and a B.A. in biochemistry from Xavier University.

Paolo Galfetti is a member of our Board of Directors and is the chairperson of the Corporate Governance Committee. Mr. Galfetti is the Chief Executive Officer of APR Applied Pharma Research SA ("APR"). Pursuant to the contractual terms for the acquisition of APR by the Company, the then shareholders of APR were entitled to appoint a designee to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors. Mr. Galfetti has over thirty years of management experience in the pharmaceutical sector, including in the areas of business development and licensing, operational strategic management, clinical research, and pharmaceutical discovery and development. He joined APR in 1995 as head of licensing and business development and was appointed Chief Executive Officer in 2002. Prior to joining APR, Mr. Galfetti was a founding partner, CEO and board member of the Institute for Pharmacokinetic and Analytical Studies AG (IPAS), a Swiss contract research organization (CRO) as well as CEO and board member of Farma Resa s.r.l., an Italian CRO. Mr. Galfetti is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) and has a bachelor’s degree in economics from the Commercial University Bocconi, Milan, Italy.

Michelle Lock is a member of our Board of Directors. Ms. Lock is the Chief Operating Officer of Covis Pharma Group, a Switzerland-based global specialty pharmaceutical company that markets therapeutic solutions for patients with life-threatening conditions and chronic illnesses. Ms. Lock’s broad biopharmaceutical industry experience spans nearly 30 years and includes leadership roles in commercialization across various therapeutic areas including oncology, hematology, cardiovascular and metabolic disease, liver disease, immunology, virology and neuroscience. Previously, Ms. Lock served as the Senior Vice President and Head of International organization at Acceleron Pharma Inc, a biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the discovery, development, and commercialization of therapeutics to treat serious and rare diseases until its acquisition by Merck & Co. for $11.5 billion. Before that, she was a consultant to biotechnology companies, providing leadership, guidance, and strategic support to managements seeking to establish or improve their international businesses based in Switzerland. Earlier, Ms. Lock was Senior Vice President & Head of International at Sage Therapeutics, a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company committed to discovering, developing, and commercializing novel medicines to transform the lives of patients with life-altering central nervous system (CNS) disorders. During her career, Ms. Lock also spent 24 years with Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) in positions of increasing responsibility in sales, commercial, general management, regional leadership and business strategy. In her most recent role at BMS, she served as Vice President and General Manager for EU Country Clusters & Global Capabilities Hub leadership, Switzerland, driving the company’s leadership efforts in immuno-oncology. She has served as Honorary Ambassador between Switzerland and the U.S. since 2018, as well is a past member of the board of directors of the Swiss American Chamber of Commerce and the Interpharma Switzerland Pharmaceutical Industry. She earned a degree in Science/Nursing at Royal Melbourne University, Australia and studied General Management and Internal General Management at CEDEP, France.

Executive Officers

Paolo Galfetti. See biographical information above.

Jack Weinstein joined us in October 2020 as our U.S. based Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and serves as the President of Relief U.S. Mr. Weinstein has nearly 40 years of wide-ranging executive management expertise, including as a CFO, investment banker and consultant in the biopharmaceutical and life sciences industries. Prior to joining Relief, Mr. Weinstein served as Managing Director and Head of Healthcare Investment Banking at Avalon NetWorth, an independent New York-based boutique investment bank. Prior to joining Avalon, Mr. Weinstein was CFO, Treasurer and Vice President of Business Development at Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(Nasdaq:CPRX), a biopharmaceutical company developing therapies to treat rare diseases, where he led the Company through its Initial Public Offering. Prior to joining Catalyst, Mr. Weinstein was the President and founder of The Sterlington Group, Inc., a consulting firm providing strategic, business development, regulatory and “CFO” consulting services. Mr. Weinstein received his MBA from the Harvard Business School.

Anthony M. Kim joined us in November 2021 as our Head of U.S. Commercial Operations. In that role, he will oversee the launch of PKU Golike in the United States and work closely with Acer in the launch of ACER-001 if it is approved for commercialization. Prior to joining Relief, for the past three years, Mr. Kim was Vice President, Global Commercial Development at Novocure, where he led a 21-person team in the planning and U.S. marketing execution for that company’s Optune and Optune Lua, FDA-approved, therapeutic devices that deliver alternating electrical fields to treat patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme and Mesothelioma. Further, from 2017 to 2018, Mr. Kim was Executive Director of Marketing at Ignyta (subsequently acquired by Roche), during which time he led the development of the commercial launch plan for entrectinib, an oral, oncologic agent in pan-tumor clinical trials for patients with neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) and ROS1 fusion-positive disease. From 2012 to 2017, Mr. Kim held positions of increasing responsibility at Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., most recently serving as Director, Head of U.S. Marketing, Hypophosphatasia, where he managed the U.S. marketing efforts for the launch of Strensiq, a novel, first-in-class enzyme replacement therapy for the treatment of hypophosphatasia, a rare inherited metabolic bone disorder. Earlier, from 2004 to 2012, Mr. Kim held various positions at Genentech, which is a part of the Roche Group, including Product Manager, Herceptin Marketing and Divisional Sales Manager, Rituxan Hematology. Mr. Kim received his Bachelor of Arts Degree from Harvard University and a Master of Business Administration from The Wharton School.

2

Jeremy Meinen has been our Vice President Finance and Administration since October 2020 and our Chief Accounting Officer since December 2021. He joined Relief as ad-interim Chief Financial Officer in April 2020. Prior to joining Relief, Jeremy provided financial consulting, controlling and auditing services to companies in various industries. He began his career in an international audit firm, where he held positions of increasing responsibility and scope over more than six years. Mr. Meinen holds a Master of Science in finance from Bocconi University and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration from the University of Geneva. He is a Swiss certified public accountant and former licensed audit expert.

Nermeen Varawalla, MD, PhD, MBA joined us as our Chief Medical Officer in December 2021. Prior to joining Relief, Dr. Varawalla served as Chief Medical Officer and Head of Clinical Development with Atlantic Healthcare plc, a specialist pharmaceutical company with late-stage clinical assets for inflammatory bowel disease and gastrointestinal dysmotility in rare diseases. Before that, Dr. Varawalla was Managing Director of Clinstrat Ltd., a life science and business consultancy, where, among other projects, she worked with private equity firms to develop the investment thesis and business plan for the buy-out of BTG plc’s specialty pharmaceutical business unit, valued at approximately $1 billion. Before that, Dr. Varawalla was Senior Vice President and Head of Clinical Development and BTG International plc, where she led a global team responsible for clinical development of the company’s product portfolio across both pharmaceutical and medical device business units before it was acquired by Boston Scientific for $4.4 billion in 2019. Earlier, Dr. Varawalla was Chief Medical Officer at Accord Healthcare UK, an international division of Intas Pharmaceuticals and Executive Vice President of Lambda Therapeutic Research, Intas’ full-service contract research organization. She began her career as a physician in obstetrics and gynecology at KEM Group of University Hospitals, Mumbai before continuing her specialist training at NHS University Hospitals in the United Kingdom. She is the current President of the INSEAD UK Alumni Association and is presently Chair, Medical Advisory Group, Atorvia Health Technologies and a member of the International Advisory Council of the Oxford India Centre for Sustainable Development. Dr. Varawalla received her MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Bachelor of Surgery) and MD degree from the University of Mumbai, her PhD from the University of Oxford where she was a Rhodes Research Fellow, and her MBA from INSEAD.

Marco Marotta became our Chief Business Officer in December 2021. Mr. Marotta joined us as part of our acquisition of APR, where he served as Corporate Director, Business Development and Licensing. Mr. Marotta joined APR in January 2015, where he was initially in charge to reshape and optimize APR’s end-to-end supply chain process, and afterwards, he joined the licensing and business development department, establishing and consolidating APR’s presence in emerging markets like the Asia-Pacific and Latin American regions. From 2019, Mr. Marotta led APR Business Development as a director, with responsibility of out-licensing proprietary products worldwide, divesting non-strategic assets and maximizing monetization as well as merging APR’s business with Relief. Mr. Marotta received a Master of Science in Engineering from the University Federico II in Napoli and an Executive MBA from Commercial University Bocconi in Milan.

Our principal Swiss legal advisor is VISCHER AG, located at Schuetzengasse 1, PO Box, CH-8021 Zurich, Switzerland and our principal United States legal adviser is Akerman LLP, located at 201 East Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1800, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301.

MAZARS SA has been our auditor since 2017. The address for MAZARS SA is Chemin de Blandonnet 2, 1214 Vernier-Geneva, Switzerland.

3

The table below sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and shows our capitalization as of March 31, 2022. You should read this table in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2021, together with the accompanying notes and the other information appearing under the heading “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” All amounts below are in Swiss Francs (CHF) and are in thousands. The indebtedness set forth below is unsecured and non-guaranteed.

As of March 31, 2022, 4,159,788,621 of our ordinary shares were outstanding, excluding 256,545,996 shares that were held in treasury.

As of June 28, 2022, our cash and cash equivalents were approximately CHF 30.0 million and 4,416,334,617 of our ordinary shares were outstanding, including 227,108,394 shares that were held in treasury.

Not applicable

5

Risk Factors Summary

We are providing the following summary of the risk factors contained in our Form 20-F to enhance the readability and accessibility of our risk factor disclosures. We encourage our stockholders to carefully review the full risk factors contained in this Form 20-F in their entirety for additional information regarding the risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to vary materially from our recent results or from our anticipated future results.

Risks Related to our Business

6

Risks related to our Relationships with Third Parties

Risks related to Intellectual Property

7

Risks related to our Financial Condition and Results of Operations

8

Risks related to regulation of our business

Risks related to our common shares and our ADRs

9

10

Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below and the other information in this Registration Statement before making an investment. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected if any of these risks occur, and as a result, the market price of our shares could decline. This Registration Statement also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. See “Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors.

Risks Related to our Business

We depend heavily on the success of our product candidates. If our clinical studies are unsuccessful, if we or our collaboration partners do not obtain regulatory approval or if we or our collaboration partners are unable to commercialize our product candidates, or if we experience significant delays in doing so, our business, financial condition and results of operations will be materially adversely affected.

We currently have a small number of products approved for sale, all of which were acquired in the business combination with APR, generating a limited volume of sales. We have invested a significant portion of our efforts and financial resources in the development of RLF-100, have recently licensed ACER-001, and have added additional products to our portfolio through our acquisitions of AdVita and APR. Our ability to generate significantly higher product revenues will depend heavily on successful clinical development, obtaining regulatory approval and eventual commercialization of these product candidates. The success of our current and future product candidates will depend on several factors, including the following:

If we or our collaborators do not achieve one or more of these factors in a timely manner or at all, we could experience significant delays or an inability to successfully commercialize our current or future product candidates, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial conditions and results of operations.

11

The potential success of RLF-100 for the treatment of critical COVID-19 patients is dependent on the unpredictable trajectory of the virus and effects of other treatments.

In March 2021, NeuroRx, Inc. (“NeuroRx”) announced top-line 60-day results from phase 2b/3 intravenous (“IV”) trial. According to a press release issued by NeuroRx, across all patients and sites aviptadil IV met the primary endpoint for successful recovery from respiratory failure at days 28 (p=0.14) and 60 (p=0.13) and also demonstrated a meaningful benefit in survival after controlling for ventilation status and treatment site. However, they also reported that the study did not demonstrate a statistically-significant difference on the study’s primary endpoint without statistical adjustment for these pre-specified covariates. On the basis of these findings, NeuroRx announced on June 1, 2021 that it had applied to the FDA for Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) and subsequently planned to submit a New Drug Application (“NDA”) with the United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”).

On November 5, 2021, NRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“NRx”), which became the parent corporation of NeuroRx on its merger with Big Rock Partners Acquisition Corp, in May 2021, announced in a press release that the FDA had declined EUA for the use of aviptadil for the treatment of acute respiratory failure due to critical COVID-19. In its press release, NRx stated that in the letter from the FDA denying EUA, the FDA noted that it has only reviewed safety data on 131 patients treated with aviptadil. NRx further reported in its press release that it will attempt to coordinate a review by the FDA of 150 or more additional patients treated with aviptadil through other trials. Additionally, NRx stated in its press release that the study’s Data Safety and Monitoring Board reviewing the trial found no new safety issues.

On November 29, 2021, NRx issued a press release announcing the results of a subsequent statistical analysis it commissioned from Dr. David Schoenfeld, a statistician with expertise in life-threatening diseases of the lung. According to the press release, Dr. Schoenfeld analyzed the subgroup of patients in the Phase 2b/3 trial that remained in respiratory failure despite treatment with remdesivir and stated that the analysis identified a statistically significant (p=0.03) 2.5-fold increased odds of a patient having survived and being free of respiratory failure at 60 days (the primary endpoint) and a statistically significant (p=0.006) four-fold higher odds of 60-day survival among patients treated with ZYESAMI compared to those treated with placebo.

On January 5, 2022 NRx reported in a press release that it had submitted an additional application to the FDA seeking EUA for the use of aviptadil to treat patients with critical COVID-19 who are at immediate risk for death from respiratory failure despite treatment with approved therapy, including Remdesivir. There can be no assurance as to whether this additional EUA application will be approved.

On March 3, 2022, two U.S. Senators and two members of the House of Representatives sent a letter to Dr. Robert Califf, Commissioner of the FDA, and Dr. Anthony Fauci, Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease regarding the results of the right-to-try administration of ZYESAMI. The letter discusses the results and seeks comment on the FDA’s review of the ZYESAMI EUA application and the FDA’s stance that the EUA will not be reviewed until the completion of clinical trials later this year. There can be no assurance as to what effect the letter will have on the review and consideration of the EUA application.

Vaccines for COVID-19 have been available since November 2020. In addition, other medications have been approved on an emergency use basis, including Gilead Sciences’ Veklury (Remdesivir), which has been approved for use in adult and certain pediatric patients requiring hospitalization for COVID-19, which has been approved by the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), Pfizer’s Paxlovid, by the FDA, the EMA and the United Kingdom’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (“MHPRA”), and Merck’s Lagevrio, which has been approved by the MHPRA. Paxlovid and Lagevrio are both oral treatments for COVID-19 that may significantly reduce serious illness or death from COVID-19 if treatment is started early enough in the progression of the disease. It is not yet known how current treatments will affect the future of the pandemic, including the number of cases and their severity, which increases the uncertainty regarding the future medical need for aviptadil for the treatment of COVID-19.

Then can be no assurance that RLF-100 will ever be approved by the FDA as a treatment for COVID-19 or as a treatment for any other indication.

Our business is subject to significant regulation from governments and regulatory bodies, including marketing approval requirements, which could lengthen the development time, increase the cost of developing RLF-100 and our other drug product candidates or delay, prevent or limit the commercialization of our product candidates.

Prior to marketing, RLF-100 must undergo a comprehensive regulatory approval procedure by the relevant authorities, including the EMA for Europe, the FDA for the U.S., and other national health agencies, including the Swiss agency for therapeutic products (“Swissmedic”; Schweizerisches Heilmittelinstitut). Such procedures may last several years and require considerable financial expenditure. These procedures can only start after providing the agencies with all data generated when testing RLF-100, including pre-clinical and clinical data from extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy in humans. Clinical testing is expensive, difficult to design and implement, can take many years to complete and is uncertain as to the outcome. A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing. It is hence impossible to predict when or if the FDA will determine that RLF-100 is effective or safe in humans and will receive regulatory approval.

To date, NeuroRx has refused to provide us with the data from the Phase 2b/3 trial of IV aviptadil that they reported in March 2021 and their correspondence with the FDA as to their EUA applications. This failure to provide the data has made it impossible for us to file an application for conditional marketing approval of RLF-100 in Europe. This failure to provide data is part of the claims we have made in our lawsuit against NeuroRx. There can be no assurance as to when or if we will receive the data we need to make the required filings with European authorities.

12

When a medicinal product candidate receives regulatory approval, the approval can nonetheless be subject to limitations, e.g., with regard to the indications for which it may be marketed. The approval may also be given subject to conditions, such as additional proof of the medicinal product’s effectiveness and safety. Even after approval is granted, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, recordkeeping, labeling, marketing, sales and distribution of its product candidates are regulated by government agencies in countries where we intend to market our products. All these activities are subject to recurring scrutiny and regular inspections by the relevant agencies. As a consequence, if previously unknown problems are discovered in connection with an approved product, its manufacturer or the manufacturing facilities, this can result in restrictions on the product, the manufacturer or the manufacturing facilities, up to the requirement to withdraw the product from the market. In any event, changes in existing regulations or adoption of new regulations could prevent the Group and/or its commercialization partners from obtaining or maintaining, or affect the timing of, future regulatory approvals.

These and other factors, alone or together, may have a material adverse effect on the Group’s business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects as well as the Share price.

Results of early clinical studies may not be predictive of future study results.

Positive or timely results from preclinical or early-stage clinical studies do not ensure positive or timely results in late-stage clinical studies or product approval by the FDA, the EMA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. Products that show positive preclinical or early clinical results may not show sufficient safety or efficacy in later-stage clinical studies and therefore may fail to obtain regulatory approvals. In addition, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses. Many companies that believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical and clinical studies have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval for the product candidates. The FDA, the EMA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and in determining when or whether regulatory approval will be obtained for any of our product candidates. Even if we believe that the data collected from clinical studies of our product candidates are promising, such data may not be sufficient to support approval by the FDA, the EMA or any other regulatory authority.

In some instances, there can be significant variability in safety and/or efficacy results between different studies of the same product candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in study procedures set forth in protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, adherence to the dosing regimen and other study protocols, and the rate of dropout among clinical study participants. In the case of our later-stage clinical product candidates, results may differ in general on the basis of the larger number of clinical study sites and the additional countries and languages involved in these clinical studies.

Clinical studies may include subject-reported outcomes, some of which may be captured with electronic diaries. We have no assurance and cannot rely on past experience that the high frequency of questioning is not influencing the measured outcome. In addition, low compliance with daily reporting requirements may impact the studies’ validity or statistical power. We cannot assure that any Phase 1, phase 2, phase 3 or other clinical studies that either we or our collaboration partners may conduct will demonstrate consistent or adequate efficacy and safety to obtain regulatory approval to market our product candidates.

If we or our collaboration partners are required to conduct additional clinical studies or other testing of any of our current or future product candidates that we or our collaboration partners develop, beyond the studies and testing that we or our collaboration partners contemplate, if we or our collaboration partners are unable to successfully complete clinical studies of our product candidates or other testing, if the results of these studies or tests are unfavorable or are only modestly favorable, or if there are safety concerns associated with our current or future product candidates, we may:

13

Our product development costs will also increase if we experience delays in testing or receiving marketing approvals and we may be required to obtain additional funds to complete clinical studies. We cannot assure that our clinical studies will begin as planned or be completed on schedule, if at all, or that we will not need to amend our studies after they have begun. Significant clinical study delays could also shorten any periods during which we or our collaboration partners may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do, which may harm our business and results of operations. In addition, some of the factors that cause, or lead to, clinical study delays may ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

The successful commercialization of our product candidates will depend on the extent to which governmental authorities and health insurers establish adequate coverage and reimbursement levels and pricing policies.

The successful commercialization of our product candidates will depend, in part, on the extent to which coverage and reimbursement for our products will be available from government and health administration authorities, private health insurers and other third-party payors. To manage healthcare costs, many governments and third-party payors increasingly scrutinize the pricing of new technologies and require greater levels of evidence of favorable clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness before extending coverage. In light of such challenges to prices and the requirement for increasing levels of evidence of the benefits and clinical outcomes of new technologies, we cannot be sure that coverage will be available for any of our current or future product candidates that we or our collaboration partners will commercialize or, if available, that the reimbursement rates will be adequate in each respective region. If we are unable to obtain adequate levels of coverage and reimbursement for our product candidates, their marketability will be negatively and materially impacted.

Third-party payors may deny coverage and reimbursement status altogether for a given drug product, or may cover the product but also establish prices at levels that are too low to enable us to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development. Because the rules and regulations regarding coverage and reimbursement change frequently, in some cases at short notice, even when there is favorable coverage and reimbursement, future changes may occur that adversely impact the favorable status. Further, the net reimbursement for drug products may be subject to additional reductions in the future depending on policy changes enacted by the national regulatory bodies.

The unavailability or inadequacy and variability of third-party coverage and reimbursement could have a material adverse effect on the market acceptance of our product candidates and the future revenues we may expect to receive from those products. In addition, we are unable to predict what additional legislation or regulation relating to the healthcare industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement may be enacted in the future, or what effect such legislation or regulation would have on our business.

14

Our products may not gain market acceptance, in which case we or our collaboration partners may not be able to generate product revenues, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even if the FDA, the EMA or any other regulatory authority approves the marketing of any product candidates that we develop, physicians, healthcare providers, patients or the medical community may not accept or use them. Efforts to educate the medical community and third-party payors on the benefits of our product candidates may require significant resources and may not be successful. If any of our current or future product candidates does not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we or our collaboration partners may not generate significant product or royalty revenues or any profits from operations. The degree of market acceptance of our product candidates that are approved for commercial sale will depend on a variety of factors, including:

If our product candidates fail to gain market acceptance, this will have a material adverse impact on our ability to generate revenues to provide a satisfactory, or any, return on our investments. Even if some products achieve market acceptance, the market may prove to not be large enough to allow us to generate significant revenues.

In addition, the potential market opportunity of our product candidates is difficult to estimate precisely. Our estimates of the potential market opportunity are predicated on several key assumptions such as industry knowledge and publications, third-party research reports and other surveys. These assumptions involve the exercise of significant judgment on the part of our management and are inherently uncertain, and the reasonableness of these assumptions could not have been assessed by an independent source in every detail. If any of the assumptions proves to be inaccurate, then the actual market for our product candidates could be smaller than our estimates of the potential market opportunity. If the actual market for our product candidates is smaller than we expect, or if any approved products fail to achieve an adequate level of acceptance by physicians, healthcare payors and patients, our product or royalty revenue may be limited, and it may be more difficult for us to achieve or maintain profitability.

15

We depend on enrollment of patients in our clinical studies for our product candidates. If we are unable to enroll patients in our clinical studies, our research and development efforts could be materially adversely affected.

If our product candidates are associated with serious adverse, undesirable or unacceptable side effects, we may need to abandon their development or limit development to certain uses or subpopulations in which such side effects are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk–benefit perspective. Many compounds that initially showed promise in preclinical or early-stage testing were later found to cause side effects that restricted their use and prevented further development of the compound for larger indications.

Generally, the specific target population of patients and therapeutic time windows may make it difficult for us to enroll enough patients to complete clinical studies for our products in a timely and cost-effective manner. Delays in the completion of any clinical study of our product candidates will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process, and delay or potentially jeopardize our or our collaboration partners’ ability to commence product sales and generate revenue. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical studies may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

If serious adverse, undesirable or unacceptable side effects are identified during the development of our product candidates or following approval, if any, we may need to abandon our development of such product candidates, the commercial profile of any approved label may be limited, or we may be subject to other significant negative consequences following marketing approval, if any.

If our product candidates are associated with serious adverse, undesirable or unacceptable side effects, we may need to abandon their development or limit development to certain uses or subpopulations in which such side effects are less prevalent, less severe or more acceptable from a risk–benefit perspective. Many compounds that initially showed promise in preclinical or early-stage testing were later found to cause side effects that restricted their use and prevented further development of the compound for larger indications.

Occurrence of serious side effects could impede clinical study enrollment and receipt of marketing approval from the U.S. FDA, the EMA and comparable other national regulatory authorities. Adverse events (“AEs”) and/or serious adverse events (“SAEs”) could also adversely affect physician or patient acceptance of our product candidates.

Additionally, if one or more of our product candidates receives marketing approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by such products, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including the following:

16

Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the particular product candidate, if approved, and could significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects.

We operate in highly competitive and rapidly changing industries, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing competing products before or more successfully than we do.

The biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical industries are highly competitive and subject to significant and rapid technological change. Our success is highly dependent on our ability to discover, develop and obtain marketing approval for new and innovative products on a cost-effective basis and to market them successfully. In doing so, we face and will continue to face intense competition from a variety of businesses, including large, fully integrated pharmaceutical companies, specialty pharmaceutical companies and biopharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, government agencies and other private and public research institutions in Europe, the U.S. and other jurisdictions. Many of our potential competitors, alone or with their strategic partners, have substantially greater financial, technical and human resources than we do and significantly greater experience in the discovery and development of product candidates, obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals of treatments, and the commercialization of those treatments. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our competitors.

The highly competitive nature of and rapid technological changes in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries could render our product candidates or our technology obsolete or noncompetitive. The commercial opportunity for our products could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors:

Should any of these occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our business is subject to additional risks associated with international operations.

Our business is subject to risks associated with conducting business internationally. Accordingly, our future results could be harmed by a variety of factors, including:

17

The COVID-19 pandemic may impact our business.

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus, COVID-19, surfaced in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. By March 2020, COVID-19 had spread to other countries, including Switzerland and the United States, and was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020. Since the beginning of the pandemic, governments, public institutions, and other organizations in countries and localities where COVID-19 cases have been identified have taken certain preventative or protective measures to combat the transmission of the virus, including implementation of travel restrictions or bans, closures of non-essential businesses, limitations of public gatherings, other social distancing and shelter-in-place measures, and delays or cancellations of elective surgeries. The COVID-19 pandemic continues to pose the risk that the Company, our employees, contractors, suppliers, and other partners may be prevented from conducting business activities for an indefinite period of time due to shutdowns that may be requested or mandated by state and federal governmental authorities.

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, we may experience disruptions that could materially impact our business and planned clinical trials, including:

Our future growth and ability to compete depends on retaining our key personnel and recruiting additional qualified personnel.

Our success depends upon the continued contributions of our key management, scientific and technical personnel, many of whom have substantial experience with or been instrumental for us and our projects. The loss of our key managers and senior scientists could delay our research and development activities. Laws and regulations on executive compensation, including legislation in Switzerland, may restrict our ability to attract, motivate and retain the required level of qualified personnel. In Switzerland, legislation affecting public companies has been passed that, among other things, imposes an annual binding shareholder “say on pay” vote with respect to the compensation of the executive management, including executive officers and the members of the board of directors. In addition, the competition for qualified personnel in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical field is intense, and our future success depends upon our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled scientific, technical and managerial employees. We face competition for personnel from other companies, universities, public and private research institutions and other organizations. If our recruitment and retention efforts are unsuccessful in the future, it may be difficult for us to implement our business strategy, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

18

We may become exposed to costly and damaging liability claims, either when testing our product candidates or at the commercial stage or as a result of claims against our directors and officers, and our liability insurance may not cover all damages from such claims.

We are exposed to potential product liability and professional indemnity risks that are inherent in the research, development, manufacturing, marketing and use of pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical products. Currently we have no products that have been approved for commercial sale; however, our current and future use of product candidates in clinical studies, and the sale of any approved products in the future, may expose us to liability claims. These claims might be made by patients that use the product, by healthcare providers, or by pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical companies or others selling such products. Any claims against us, regardless of their merit, could be difficult and costly to defend and could materially adversely affect the market for our product candidates or any prospects for commercialization of our product candidates.

Although the clinical trial process is designed to identify and assess potential side effects, it is always possible that a drug, even after regulatory approval, may exhibit unforeseen side effects. If any of our product candidates were to cause adverse side effects during clinical studies or after approval of the product candidate, we may be exposed to substantial liabilities. Physicians and patients may not comply with any warnings that identify known potential adverse effects and patients who should not use our product candidates.

We continuously seek to maintain appropriate and cost-effective liability insurance coverage in connection with our products and for purposes of indemnifying our directors and officers for claims against them. It is, however, possible that our liabilities could exceed our insurance coverage. For example, we intend to expand our insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates. However, we may not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or obtain insurance coverage that will be adequate to satisfy any liability that may arise. If a successful liability claim or series of claims is brought against us for uninsured liabilities or in excess of insured liabilities, our assets may not be sufficient to cover such claims and our business operations could be impaired.

Should any of the events described above occur, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A breakdown or breach of our information technology systems and cybersecurity efforts, or those of our key business partners or service providers, could subject us to liability or reputational damage or interrupt the operation of our business.

Despite the implementation of security measures, our internal computer systems and those of our contractors and consultants may be vulnerable to damage from computer viruses and unauthorized access. If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in our operations, it could result in a material disruption of our development programs and our business operations. For example, the loss of clinical trial data from completed, ongoing or future clinical trials could result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data. Our ability to monitor our partners’ data security practices are limited, and due to applicable laws and regulations or contractual obligations, we may be held responsible for any security breaches or cybersecurity attack attributed to them as they relate to the information we share with them. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data or systems, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information or personal data of our employees, partners or study subjects, we could incur liability and the further development and commercialization of our product candidates could be delayed.

19

We are increasingly dependent upon technology systems and data. Our computer systems continue to increase in multitude and complexity due to the growth in our business, making them potentially vulnerable to breakdown, malicious intrusion and random attack. Data privacy or security breaches, including those by individuals authorized to access our technology systems or others may pose a risk that sensitive data, including intellectual property, trade secrets or personal information belonging to us, our patients, study subjects or other business partners, may be exposed to unauthorized persons or to the public. Cyber-attacks are increasing in their frequency, sophistication and intensity, and are becoming increasingly difficult to detect. They are often carried out by motivated, well-resourced, skilled and persistent actors, including nation states, organized crime groups, “hacktivists” and employees or contractors acting with malicious intent. Cyber-attacks could include the deployment of harmful malware and key loggers, ransomware, a denial-of-service attack, a malicious website, phishing attacks, computer viruses, social engineering and other means to affect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of our technology systems and data. Our key business partners face similar risks and any security breach of their systems could adversely affect our security posture. Although we continue to build and improve our systems and infrastructure, and believe we have taken appropriate security measures to reduce these risks to our data and information technology systems, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent, detect or appropriately respond to breakdowns or breaches in our systems that could adversely affect our business and operations and/or result in the loss of critical or sensitive information, including personal information, which could result in financial, legal, business or reputational harm to us. We continue to invest in industry standard IS/IT solutions and managed services that often include the relevant, layered protection and monitoring practices surrounding our data and IT systems and related infrastructure. These investments reduce further these risks in that they enable organizations such as ours to leverage the resources necessary to monitor IT systems and infrastructure for any current or potential threats. These investments can be costly, and as cyber threats continue to evolve, we may be required to expend significant, additional resources to continue to modify and/or enhance our protective, detective and responsive measures required to remediate any identified information security vulnerabilities. Claims related to security breaches, cyber-attacks and other related breaches may result in significant fines, penalties and payment of damages. We may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to protect against and respond to any attempted or existing cybersecurity incidents. In addition, our remediation efforts may not be successful.

Changes in laws, rules or regulations relating to data privacy and security, or any actual or perceived failure by us to comply with such laws, rules, regulations and standards, or contractual or other obligations relating to data privacy and security, could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

We are, and may increasingly become, subject to various laws, rules, regulations and standards, as well as contractual obligations, relating to data privacy and security in the jurisdictions in which we operate. The regulatory environment related to data privacy and security is increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, and enforcement practices are likely to remain uncertain for the foreseeable future. These laws, rules, regulations and standards may be interpreted and applied differently over time and from jurisdiction to jurisdiction in a manner that could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. New laws, amendments to or reinterpretations of existing laws, rules, regulations, standards and other obligations may require us to incur additional costs and restrict our business operations, and may require us to change how we use, collect, store, transfer or otherwise process certain types of personal information and to implement new processes to comply with those laws.

Evolving compliance and operational requirements impose significant costs, which are likely to increase over time. In addition, such requirements may require us to modify our data-processing practices and policies, distract management or divert resources from other initiatives and projects. For instance, the European Union Court of Justice and the Swiss Data Protection Authority have declared the U.S. Privacy Shield to be inadequate for transfers of personal data out of the EU and Switzerland, which could increase our compliance burden. If we are unable to properly protect the privacy and security of personal information, including protected health information, we could be found to have breached our contracts. In addition, any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with any applicable federal, state or similar foreign laws and regulations relating to data privacy and security could result in damage to our reputation and our relationship with our customers, as well as proceedings or litigation by governmental agencies, customers, partners, collaborators and/or study subjects, including class action privacy litigation in certain jurisdictions, which would subject us to significant fines, sanctions, awards, penalties or judgments, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

20

Business disruptions could seriously harm our future revenue and financial condition and increase our costs.

Our operations and those of our third-party collaborators and other contractors and consultants, could be subject to earthquakes, power shortages, telecommunications failures, water shortages, floods, hurricanes, typhoons, fires, extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics, and other natural or man-made disasters or business interruptions, for which we are partly uninsured. In addition, we rely on our third-party research institution collaborators for conducting research and development of our product candidates, and they may be affected by government shutdowns or withdrawn funding. The occurrence of any of these business disruptions could seriously harm our operations and financial condition and increase our costs and expenses. We rely on third-party manufacturers to produce and process our product candidates. Our ability to obtain clinical supplies of our product candidates could be disrupted if the operations of these suppliers are affected by a man-made or natural disaster or by other business interruption.

Our operations are conducted internationally with employees, consultants and strategic vendors located in the U.S. and in Europe, including Switzerland where the Company is headquartered. Damage or extended periods of interruption to our corporate, development or research facilities due to fire, natural disaster, power loss, communications failure, unauthorized entry or other events could cause us to cease or delay development of some or all of our product candidates. Although we maintain property damage and business interruption insurance coverage on these facilities, our insurance might not cover all losses under such circumstances and our business may be seriously harmed by such delays and interruption.

We have little history of commercializing pharmaceutical products, which may make it difficult to evaluate our future viability.

Our operations to date have been limited to financing and staffing our company and developing our technology and developing our product candidates, and until our acquisition of APR we had not generated any revenue from product sales. While since our acquisition of APR we have begun marketing commercial products, our history of operating in the commercial market is short. Consequently, predictions about our future success or viability may not be as accurate as they could be if we had a longer history of successfully developing and commercializing pharmaceutical products. Factors that may affect our ability to commercialize our product candidates on our own include recruiting and retaining adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel, obtaining access to or persuading adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe our drug candidates, and other unforeseen costs associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization. Developing a sales and marketing organization requires significant investment, is time-consuming and could delay the launch of our product candidates. We may not be able to build an effective sales and marketing organization. In addition, successful commercialization also requires an enhanced regulatory organization which we currently do not have. If we are unable to build our own distribution and marketing capabilities, are unable to find suitable partners for the commercialization of our product candidates or do not successfully obtain the necessary regulatory capabilities, we may not generate revenues from them or be able to reach or sustain profitability.

We may not be able to formulate or manufacture RLF-100 to the standards needed for sustained commercial supply.

RLF-100 has not been formulated or manufactured under chemistry, manufacturing and controls required for successful commercialization of drugs. A long-term stable IV or Inhaled formulation of RLF-100 has not yet been produced, and while NRx has stated in its filings with the SEC that they have developed such a formulation, we has not been provided with information allowing us to validate their findings. Further, while we assert that NeuroRx’s formulation is available to us under the Collaboration Agreement, NeuroRx contests this position in the lawsuit. The failure to produce such a formulation would have a significant negative impact on the medical application and commercial opportunity of RLF-100.

21

Risks related to our Relationships with Third Parties

We are in litigation with NeuroRx, and there can be no assurance as to the result of that litigation.

On October 7, 2021, we filed a lawsuit against NeuroRx and its now former Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Jonathan Javitt, for multiple breaches of the Collaboration Agreement. The complaint was filed in the Supreme Court in the State of New York in Manhattan.

The complaint alleges that defendants are in breach of numerous provisions of the Collaboration Agreement, including without limitation:

The suit also alleges, among other matters, breaches of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing and tortious interference with prospective economic advantage.

The Complaint, among other remedies, seeks damages, an order compelling NeuroRx to comply with multiple provisions of the Collaboration Agreement, and a declaration directing NeuroRx to deliver the entire data set from the Phase 2b/3 clinical trial of intravenously-administering aviptadil to Relief.

Further, on January 10, 2022, NeuroRx, filed a complaint against Relief. Among other claims, NeuroRx’s complaint makes the following allegations:

In the complaint, NeuroRx is claiming damages in excess of $185 million, as well as seeking a ruling that the Collaboration Agreement is void. We have yet to be served with the complaint filed by NeuroRx, which we expect will ultimately be consolidated with our complaint. We are also considering filing additional claims against NeuroRx and Dr. Javitt, including for defamation, as a result recent public statements made about Relief by NeuroRx. We believe that NeuroRx’s claims are without merit and that we will prevail before the court. However, there can be no assurance as to the result of the litigation, and an adverse ruling in the litigation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, and results of operations.

On March 8, 2022, NeuroRx announced the retirement of Dr. Javitt as its Chief Executive Officer. Dr. Javitt continues to serve on NRx’s Board of Directors and as its Chief Scientist and Dr. Javitt’s retirement as CEO does not affect the status of Relief’s lawsuit against Dr. Javitt. Further, the parties have begun to mediate their disputes, and these mediation efforts remain ongoing. On April 5, 2022, we issued a press release announcing that we had entered into a stipulation to stay the litigation for 90 days in order to allow the parties to focus on mediation. There can be no assurance that efforts to mediate the dispute will be successful.

If we fail to maintain our strategic relationships with any of our current or future strategic partners, our business, commercialization prospects and financial condition may be materially adversely affected.

We rely on our strategic partners, NeuroRx, which is developing RLF-100 in the United States, and Acer, from which we license ACER-001. Good relationships with our strategic partners are important for our business prospects and while we have a very positive relationship with Acer, we are in litigation with NeuroRx. Further, if our relationships with our current or future strategic partners were to challenge our use of their intellectual property or our calculations of the payments we are owed under our agreements, our business, financial condition, commercialization prospects and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

22

We may seek to form additional strategic alliances in the future with respect to our product candidates, and if we do not realize the benefits of such alliances, our business, financial condition, commercialization prospects and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Collaborations are complex and time-consuming to negotiate, document and manage. Any delays in entering into new strategic partnership agreements related to our product candidates could delay the development and commercialization of our product candidates and reduce their competitiveness even if they reach the market. We may also be restricted under existing and future collaboration agreements from entering into strategic partnerships or collaboration agreements on certain terms with other potential collaborators. We may not be able to negotiate collaborations on acceptable terms, or at all, for any of our existing or future product candidates and programs because the potential partner may consider that our research and development pipeline is insufficiently developed to justify a collaborative effort, or that our product candidates and programs do not have the requisite potential to demonstrate safety and efficacy in the target population. If we are unsuccessful in establishing and maintaining a collaboration with respect to a particular product candidate, we may have to curtail the development of that product candidate, reduce the scope of or delay its development program or one or more of our other development programs, delay its potential commercialization or reduce the scope of our sales or marketing activities, or increase our expenditures and undertake development or commercialization activities at our own expense, for which we have not budgeted. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we will not be able to bring our product candidates to market and generate product revenue. Even if we are successful in establishing a new strategic partnership or entering into a collaboration agreement, we cannot be certain that, following such a strategic transaction or license, we will be able to progress the development and commercialization of the applicable product candidates as envisaged, or that we will achieve the revenues that would justify such transaction, and we could be subject to the following risks, each of which may materially harm our business, commercialization prospects and financial condition:

We rely on third parties to conduct our nonclinical and clinical studies and perform other tasks for us. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or comply with regulatory requirements, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product candidates, and our business could be substantially harmed.

We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third-party clinical research organizations or contract research organizations (“CROs”), to monitor and manage data for our ongoing nonclinical and clinical programs, including the clinical studies of our product candidates. We rely on these parties for execution of our nonclinical and clinical studies and control only certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal, regulatory and scientific standards and our reliance on the clinical CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. We and our clinical CROs and other vendors are required to comply with current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”), current Good Clinical Practice (“cGCP”), and current Good Laboratory Practice (“cGLP”), which are regulations and guidelines enforced by the FDA, the Competent Authorities of the Member States of the EU and comparable foreign regulatory authorities for our product candidates in nonclinical and clinical development (where applicable). Regulatory authorities enforce these regulations through periodic inspections of study sponsors, principal investigators, study sites and other contractors. If we or any of our clinical CROs or vendors fail to comply with applicable regulations, the data generated in our nonclinical and clinical studies may be deemed unreliable and the EMA, FDA, other regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional nonclinical and clinical studies before approving our marketing applications. We cannot assure you that upon inspection by a given regulatory authority, such regulatory authority will determine that all of our clinical studies comply with cGCP regulations. In addition, our clinical studies must be conducted with products produced under cGMP regulations. Our failure to comply with these regulations may require us to repeat clinical studies, which would delay the regulatory approval process.

23

If any of our relationships with these third-party clinical CROs terminates, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative clinical CROs or do so on commercially reasonable terms. In addition, our clinical CROs are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such clinical CROs, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our ongoing nonclinical and clinical programs. If clinical CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced or if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to their failure to adhere to our protocols, regulatory requirements, or for other reasons, our clinical studies may be extended, delayed, or terminated and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully commercialize our product candidates. Clinical CROs may also generate higher costs than anticipated. As a result, our results of operations and the commercial prospects for our product candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase, and our ability to generate revenue could be delayed.

Switching or adding additional clinical CROs involves additional cost and requires management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new clinical CROs commences work. As a result, delays occur, which could materially impact our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines. Though we carefully manage our relationships with our clinical CROs, there can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects.

We currently rely on third-party suppliers and other third parties for production of our product candidates and our dependence on these third parties may impair the advancement of our research and development programs and the development of our product candidates.

We currently rely on and expect to continue to rely, on third parties for the manufacturing and supply of chemical and biological compounds and formulations for the clinical studies of our current and future product candidates. For the foreseeable future, we expect to continue to rely on such third parties for the manufacture of any of our product candidates on a clinical or commercial scale, if any of our product candidates receives regulatory approval. Reliance on third-party providers may expose us to different risks than if we were to manufacture product candidates ourselves. The facilities used by our contract manufacturers to manufacture our product candidates must be approved by the FDA or other regulatory authorities, pursuant to inspections that will be conducted after we submit our New Drug Application (“NDA”) or comparable marketing application to the FDA or other regulatory authority. We do not have control over a supplier’s or manufacturer’s compliance with these laws, regulations and applicable cGMP standards and other laws and regulations, such as those related to environmental health and safety matters. If our contract manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the strict regulatory requirements of the FDA or others, they will not be able to secure and/or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have no control over the ability of our contract manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control (“QC”), quality assurance (“QA”) and qualified personnel. If we are compelled or we wish to find alternative manufacturing facilities, this could significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates. Any failure to achieve and maintain compliance with these laws, regulations and standards could subject us to the risk that we may have to suspend the manufacturing of our product candidates or that obtained approvals could be revoked, which would adversely affect our business and reputation.

Third-party providers may breach agreements they have with us because of factors beyond our control. Contract manufacturers often encounter difficulties involving production yields, QC and QA, as well as shortages of qualified personnel. They may also terminate or refuse to renew their agreements because of their own financial difficulties or business priorities, potentially at a time that is costly or otherwise inconvenient for us. If we are unable to find adequate replacement or another acceptable solution in time, our clinical studies could be delayed, or our commercial activities could be harmed.

24

In addition, the fact that we are dependent on our suppliers and other third parties for the manufacture, storage and distribution of our product candidates means that we are subject to the risk that our product candidates and, if approved, commercial products may have manufacturing defects that we have limited ability to prevent or control. The sale of products containing such defects could result in recalls or regulatory enforcement action that could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Growth in the costs and expenses of components or raw materials may also adversely influence our business, financial condition and results of operations. Supply sources could be interrupted from time to time and, if interrupted, we cannot be certain that supplies could be resumed (whether in part or in whole) within a reasonable timeframe and at an acceptable cost or at all. Our current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the manufacturing of our current and future product candidates may adversely affect our future profit margins and our, or our collaboration partners’, ability to commercialize any products that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.

Risks related to Intellectual Property

We may not have sufficient patent terms to protect our products and business effectively.

Patents have a limited lifespan. In the U.S. and Europe, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years after it is filed. Although various extensions or adjustments may be available, such as adjustments based on certain delays caused by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “USPTO”) or the European Patent Office (“EPO”) to the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned, co-owned and licensed patent portfolios may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours or otherwise provide us with a competitive advantage. Even if patents covering our product candidates are obtained and unchallenged, once the patent life has expired for a product, we may be open to competition from generic medications.

Although patent term extensions under the Hatch-Waxman Act in the U.S. and under supplementary protection certificates (“SPCs”) in Europe may be available to extend the patent exclusivity term for our products, we cannot provide any assurances that any such patent term extension will be obtained and, if so, for how long. The Hatch-Waxman Act permits a patent extension term of up to five years as compensation for patent term lost during the FDA regulatory review process. A patent term extension cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval, only one patent may be extended, and only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. However, we may not be granted any extension because of, for example, failing to exercise due diligence during the testing phase or regulatory review process, failing to apply within applicable deadlines, failing to apply prior to expiration of relevant patents or otherwise failing to satisfy applicable requirements. It is not possible to base an SPC in Europe on a patent in a European Member State if that patent expires before the market approval of the clinical product, protected by the patent, is obtained. As the “product” (active ingredient(s)) must be “protected by a basic patent in force”, only a granted patent that is in force, and remains in force until it reaches the end of its full term, can serve as a “basic patent” upon which an SPC can be based. Therefore, expired patents and pending patent applications cannot serve as the basis for an SPC. Given the relatively long clinical development timelines of biologicals and new chemical entities for therapeutic purpose, we may not be granted any patent extensions as we might fail to apply for the extensions prior to expiration of relevant patents. Moreover, the applicable time period or the scope of patent protection afforded could be less than we request. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or if the term of any such extension is less than we request, such result could have a material adverse effect on our business.

25

We or our licensing or collaboration partners may become subject to intellectual property-related litigation or other proceedings to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our licensors or licensees and collaborators, any of which could be expensive, time-consuming, and unsuccessful, and may ultimately result in our loss of ownership of intellectual property.

Competitors may infringe our patents or the patents of our licensors or collaborators. To counter such infringement, we may be required to file infringement claims against those competitors, which can be expensive and time-consuming. If we or one of our licensing or collaboration partners were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering one of our product candidates, the defendant could counterclaim that the patent covering our product candidate is invalid or unenforceable or that the defendant’s products do not infringe our or our licensing collaborators’ patents or that we or our licensing collaborators infringe the defendant’s patents. In patent litigation in the U.S., defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity, unenforceability and non-infringement are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness, obviousness-type double patenting, lack of written description, or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO or the EPO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. In addition, third parties may raise similar claims before administrative bodies in the U.S., in Europe or elsewhere, even outside the context of litigation. Such mechanisms include re-examination, post-grant review, inter partes review, interference and derivation proceedings as well as equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions, such as opposition proceedings in Europe. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. Such proceedings or patent litigations could result in the revocation or cancellation of or amendment to our patents in such a way that they no longer cover our product candidates or otherwise provide any competitive advantage. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which the patent examiner and we or our licensing or collaboration partners were unaware during prosecution. A court may also refuse to stop a third party from using the technology in question on the grounds that our patents do not cover that technology. An adverse result in any proceeding could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Interference proceedings provoked by third parties or brought by us or declared by the USPTO or the EPO may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions with respect to our patents or patent applications or those of our licensors, licensees or collaborators. An unfavorable outcome could require us or our licensing or collaboration partners to cease using the related technology or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing party. Our business could be materially harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us or our licensing or collaboration partners a license on commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we or our licensing or collaboration partners are unsuccessful in any interference proceedings, we may lose our ownership of intellectual property or our patents may be narrowed or invalidated. There can be no assurance as to the outcome of the interference and opposition proceedings, and any of the foregoing could result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

Our defense of litigation, interference proceedings or other intellectual property-related proceedings may fail and, even if successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and other employees from their normal responsibilities. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and could substantially reduce the funds necessary to continue our clinical studies and research programs or force us to license necessary technology from third parties or enter into development partnerships that would help us bring our product candidates to market. We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our licensing or collaboration partners, misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the U.S.

26

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions, decisions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our Shares.

If we or our licensing or collaboration partners are unable to obtain and maintain effective patent rights for our technologies, product candidates or any future product candidates, or if the scope of the patent rights obtained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize products and technology similar or identical to ours, and our, or our collaboration partners’ ability to successfully commercialize our products and technology may be adversely affected.

We rely upon a combination of patents, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our technologies and product candidates. Our success depends in large part on our and our licensing or collaboration partners’ ability to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection in the U.S., the EU and other countries with respect to our proprietary technologies and product candidates. If such license is not granted or terminated, our licensing or collaboration partners may be required to cease development and commercialization of our product candidates, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

We have sought to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the U.S. and other countries related to any of our novel technologies and products that are important to our business. This process is expensive, time-consuming, and complex, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost, in a timely manner or in all jurisdictions. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our or our licensing or collaboration partners’ research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection. Moreover, in some circumstances, we do not have the right to control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent applications, or to maintain the patents, covering technology that we license to or from third parties. Therefore, these patents and applications may not be prosecuted and enforced in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business.

The patent position of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical companies generally is highly uncertain and involves complex legal and factual questions for which legal principles remain unsolved. As a result, the inventorship, issuance, scope, validity, enforceability and commercial value of our patent rights are highly uncertain. The pending or future patent applications that we own, co-own or in-license may fail to issue, fail to result in issued patents with claims that cover our product candidates in the U.S. or in other countries, or fail to effectively prevent others from commercializing competitive technologies and product candidates. Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the U.S. and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent protection.

We may not be aware of all third-party intellectual property rights potentially relating to our technologies or product candidates. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in the U.S. and other jurisdictions remain confidential for a period of time after filing, and some remain so until issued. Therefore, we cannot be certain that we were the first to file any patent application related to our product candidates or technologies, or whether we were the first to make the inventions claimed in our owned or co-owned patents or pending patent applications, nor can we know whether those from whom we license patents were the first to make the inventions claimed or were the first to file.

27

There is no assurance that all potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications has been found, which can invalidate a patent or prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent application. Even if patents do successfully issue, and even if such patents cover our product candidates, third parties may challenge their validity, enforceability, or scope, which may result in such patents being narrowed, found unenforceable or invalidated, which could allow third parties to commercialize our technology or products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our or our collaboration partners’ inability to manufacture or commercialize products without infringing third-party patent rights. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications may not adequately protect our intellectual property, provide exclusivity for our product candidates, prevent others from designing around our claims or provide us with a competitive advantage. Any of these outcomes could impair our ability to prevent competition from third parties, which may have a material adverse effect on our business.

We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship of our patents and other intellectual property.

We may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an interest or title in our patents or other intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor. For example, we may have inventorship disputes arise from conflicting obligations of consultants, CROs, contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”), academic institutions or others who are involved in developing our product candidates. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these and other claims challenging inventorship or our ownership of our patents or other intellectual property. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or the right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

Patent policy and rule changes could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, thereby impairing our ability to protect our technologies and products.

Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the U.S., EU or elsewhere could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of patent applications and the enforcement or defense of issued patents. Assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, in the U.S. prior to March 15, 2013, the first to make the claimed invention is entitled to the patent, whereas outside the U.S., the first to file a patent application was entitled to the patent. After March 15, 2013, under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (the “Leahy-Smith Act”), which was enacted on September 16, 2011, the U.S. moved to a first-to-file system. Under a first-to-file system, assuming the other requirements for patentability are met, the first inventor to file a patent application generally will be entitled to the patent on an invention regardless of whether a third party was the first to invent the invention. The Leahy-Smith Act also includes a number of significant changes that affect the way patent applications are prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation. These include allowing third-party submission of prior art to the USPTO during patent prosecution and additional procedures to attack the validity of a patent by the USPTO administered during post grant proceedings, including re-examination proceedings, inter partes review, post-grant review and derivation proceedings. Therefore, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation increases the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, future actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts and the USPTO could cause the laws and regulations governing patents to change in unpredictable ways. Any of the foregoing could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.

28

In addition, the patent positions of companies in the development and commercialization of biologics and pharmaceuticals are particularly uncertain. U.S. Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances and weakened the rights of patent owners in certain situations. This combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the validity and enforceability of patents, once obtained. Depending on future actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, and the USPTO, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that could have a material adverse effect on our existing patent portfolio and our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property in the future in the U.S.

If we are unable to maintain effective proprietary rights for our technologies, product candidates or any future product candidates, we may not be able to compete effectively in our markets.

In addition to the protection afforded by patents, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable or that we elect not to patent, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce, and any other elements of our product candidate discovery and development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. However, trade secrets can be difficult to protect and some courts inside and outside the U.S. are less willing or unwilling to protect trade secrets. For instance, the EU has introduced a new Directive on trade secrets increasing the standards for protection. Because we rely on our advisors, employees and third-party contractors and consultants to research and develop and to manufacture our product candidates, we must, at times, share our intellectual property with them. We seek to protect our intellectual property and other proprietary technology in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and master service agreements, if applicable, material transfer agreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our advisors, employees, contractors, consultants, licensing and collaboration partners, and other third parties with confidentiality provisions. These agreements typically limit the rights of these third parties to use or disclose our confidential information, including our intellectual property and trade secrets. These agreements also typically restrict the ability of third parties to publish data potentially relating to our intellectual property, although our agreements may contain certain limited publication rights. For example, any academic institution that we may collaborate with in the future may expect to be granted rights to publish data arising out of such collaboration, provided that we may have the right to be notified in advance and given the opportunity to delay publication for a limited time period in order for us to secure patent protection of intellectual property rights arising from the collaboration, in addition to the opportunity to remove confidential or trade secret information from any such publication. We also conduct joint research and development programs that may require us to share intellectual property under the terms of our research and development or similar agreements. However, we cannot guarantee that we have entered into such agreements with each party that may have or have had access to our trade secrets or other confidential information or proprietary technology and processes, or that such agreements will not be breached or that our trade secrets or other confidential information will not otherwise be disclosed. Despite the contractual provisions employed when working with these advisors, employees and third-party contractors and consultants, the need to share intellectual property and other confidential information increases the risk that such confidential information becomes known by our competitors, is inadvertently incorporated into the product development of others or is disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Additionally, our grant agreements typically provide for dissemination of results to academic institutions and to the general public. As a result, our information may be disseminated with the loss of protection status.

We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and trade secrets by maintaining the physical security of our premises and the physical and electronic security of our information technology systems. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property, our competitors may discover our trade secrets through breach of our agreements by third parties, for which we may not have adequate remedies for any breach, or publication of information by any of our CROs, academic partners, funding organizations or our licensing or collaboration partners. Additionally, if the steps taken to maintain our trade secrets are deemed inadequate by law, we may have insufficient recourse against third parties for misappropriating such trade secrets. Misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets could impair our competitive position and may have a material adverse effect on our business. Moreover, if any of our trade secrets were to be lawfully obtained or independently developed by a competitor or other third party, we would have no right to prevent such competitor or other third party from using that technology or information to compete with us. A competitor’s or other third party’s discovery of our intellectual property would impair our competitive position and have a material adverse effect on our business.

29

Further, the laws of different countries protect proprietary rights to a different extent or in a different manner. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property in different countries both in the U.S. and abroad. If we are unable to prevent material disclosure of the intellectual property related to our technologies to third parties, we will not be able to establish or maintain a competitive advantage in our market, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Despite confidentiality clauses within our employment agreements, we cannot ensure that departing employees will not breach any post-termination commitments in such agreements by allowing others to access our trade secrets.

Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document-submission, fee-payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for noncompliance with these requirements.

Periodic maintenance fees, renewal fees, annuity fees and various other government fees on a patent and patent application are due to be paid to the USPTO and other national patent agencies in several stages over the lifetime of the patent and patent application. The USPTO, the EPO and various other governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee-payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. We employ reputable law firms and other professionals to help us comply with these requirements and we are also dependent on our licensors or collaboration partners to take the necessary action to comply with these requirements with respect to certain of our intellectual property. Although an inadvertent lapse can in many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Noncompliance events that could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within prescribed time limits, nonpayment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit formal documents. In such an event, our competitors might be able to enter the market, which would have a material adverse effect on our business.

The patent protection and patent prosecution for some of our product candidates could be dependent on third parties.

Although we normally seek to obtain the right to control prosecution, maintenance and enforcement of the patents relating to our product candidates, there may be times when the filing and prosecution activities for patents relating to our product candidates are controlled by our licensors or collaboration partners. If any of our current or future licensing or collaboration partners fail to prosecute, maintain and enforce such patents and patent applications in a manner consistent with the best interests of our business, including by payment of all applicable fees for patents covering our product candidates, we could lose our rights to the intellectual property or our exclusivity with respect to those rights, our or our collaboration partners’ ability to develop and commercialize those product candidates may be adversely affected and we may not be able to prevent competitors from making, using, and selling competing products. In addition, even where we have the right to control patent prosecution of patents and patent applications we have licensed to and from third parties, we may still be adversely affected or prejudiced by actions or inactions of our licensees, our licensors and their counsel that took place prior to the date upon which we assumed control over patent prosecution.

30

Additionally, we may be adversely affected or prejudiced by actions or inactions of our external and internal patent counsels working solely on our projects or our joint patent counsels representing us and our collaboration partners.

Third-party claims of intellectual property infringement may expose us to substantial liability or may prevent or delay our or our collaboration partners’ development and commercialization efforts.

Numerous EU- and foreign-issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we are developing product candidates. For example, we are aware of third-party patents or patent applications that may be construed to cover one or more of our product candidates. If these patents are asserted against us or our licensing or collaboration partners and either we or our licensing or collaboration partners are found to infringe any of these patents, and are unsuccessful in demonstrating that such patents are invalid or unenforceable, then we and our licensing or collaboration partners could be required to pay substantial monetary damages or cease further development or commercialization of one or more of our product candidates or be compelled to enter into onerous licenses with such third parties. There may also be other third-party patents or patent applications with claims to materials, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods of treatment related to the use or manufacture of our product candidates and technology. Although we generally conduct a freedom-to-operate search and review with respect to our product candidates, we cannot guarantee that our search and review is complete and thorough, nor can we be sure that we have identified each and every patent and pending application in the U.S. and abroad that is relevant or necessary to the manufacturing or commercialization of our product candidates or use of our technology. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending patent applications that may later result in issued patents that our product candidates may infringe. In addition, third parties may file and obtain additional patents in the future and claim that use of our technologies infringes upon these patents.

Third parties may assert infringement claims against us based on existing patents or on patents that may be granted in the future, regardless of merit. Even if we believe such claims are without merit, a court of competent jurisdiction could hold that these third-party patents are valid, enforceable and infringed, which could materially and adversely affect our or our collaboration partners’ ability to commercialize our product candidates or technologies covered by the asserted third-party patents.

Parties making claims against us may also obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our or our collaboration partners’ ability to further develop and commercialize one or more of our product candidates. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of management and employee resources from our business. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, pay royalties, redesign our infringing products or obtain one or more licenses from third parties, which may be impossible or require substantial time and monetary expenditure. Any of the foregoing could have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations and prospects.

In addition, claims that we have misappropriated the confidential information or trade secrets of third parties could have a similar negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions, decisions, or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our Shares.

Some of our competitors may have substantially greater resources and more mature and developed intellectual property portfolios than we do and may be able to sustain the costs of complex intellectual property litigation to a greater degree and for longer periods of time than we could. In addition, patent-holding companies that focus solely on extracting royalties and settlements by enforcing patent rights may target us. As the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries expand and more patents are issued, the risk increases that our product candidates may be subject to claims of infringement of the patent rights of third parties. The uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

31

We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants, or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information of third parties or that our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.

We employ and utilize the services of individuals who were previously employed or provided services to universities or other pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees, consultants, and independent contractors do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any of our employees’, consultants’ or independent contractors’ former employers or of other third parties. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.

In addition, although it is our policy to require our employees, consultants and independent contractors who may be involved in the conception or development of intellectual property to execute agreements assigning such intellectual property to us, we may be unsuccessful in executing such an agreement with each party who, in fact, conceives or develops intellectual property that we regard as our own. The assignment of intellectual property rights may not be self-executing or the assignment agreements may be breached, and we may be forced to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims that they may bring against us, to determine the ownership of what we regard as our intellectual property.

We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.

Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries may be less extensive than those in the U.S. or Europe. In addition, the laws of different countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws in the U.S. or Europe. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the U.S. or Europe, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the U.S., Europe or other jurisdictions. In the ordinary course of prosecution and maintenance activities, we determine whether to seek patent protection outside the U.S. and Europe and in which countries. This also applies to patents we have acquired or in-licensed from third parties. In some cases, we, or our predecessors in interest or licensors of patents within our portfolio, have sought patent protection in a limited number of countries for patents covering our product candidates. Competitors may use our technologies and products in jurisdictions where we have not obtained or are unable to adequately enforce patent protection to develop their own products and further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection but enforcement is not as strong as that in the U.S. or Europe. These products may compete with our products and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing, which would have a material adverse effect on our business and financial positions.

32

Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents, trade secrets, and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biotechnology products, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement, misappropriation or other violations of our intellectual property and proprietary rights. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.

We may be unable to protect our trade secrets, know-how and technologies.

We also rely on trade secrets and non-patentable know-how and technologies it seeks to protect, in part, by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, suppliers, licensees and other contractual parties. Trade secrets and non-patentable know-how and technologies are difficult to protect. There can be no assurance that these agreements represent effective protection or that they will not be breached, that we would have adequate remedies for any breach, or that our trade secrets or non-patentable know-how and technologies will not otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors and other third parties.

These and other factors, alone or together, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects as well as the price of our shares.

Risks related to our Financial Condition and Results of Operations

We are a commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company with a history of operating losses. While we currently believe that we have sufficient funds for our planned operations well into 2023, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain the funds necessary to continue our operations beyond that point.

We incurred a net loss (defined as net loss attributable to owners of the Company) of approximately CHF 34.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and had accumulated losses at consolidation level of approximately CHF 69.8 million as of December 31, 2021. We may continue to incur losses in the foreseeable future as development expenses and other operating expenses may exceed future revenue.

Our losses have resulted principally from research and development expenses and from general business and administrative expenses. We expect to continue to incur significant operating losses in the future as we continue our research and development efforts for our current and future product candidates and seek to obtain regulatory approval and commercialization of such product candidates.

To date, we have financed our liquidity requirements primarily from equity financings and loans from our main shareholder. Biopharmaceutical and pharmaceutical product development are highly speculative undertakings and involve a substantial degree of risk. While we currently believe that we have sufficient funds for our planned operations well into 2023, there can be no assurance that we can obtain the additional funds necessary to continue our planned operations beyond that point. Our inability to obtain the required funds may make it impossible for us to continue as a going concern.

If we fail to obtain additional funding required for our planned activities, we may not have sufficient funds to continue our operations and may have to delay, reduce or eliminate one or more of our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

We are currently advancing our product candidates through clinical development, either together with a collaboration partner or independently. We expect our research and development expenses to continue to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we and/or our collaboration partners continue our ongoing studies and initiate new studies and initiate preclinical and clinical development of our product candidates.

As of December 31, 2021, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately CHF 44.8 million, As of June 28, 2022, we have cash and cash equivalents of approximately CHF 30.0 million.

33

Based on current financial current projections and available cash, we expect that we have sufficient resources to fund operations well into 2023. We also expect that with a successful launch of ACER-001 and the potential expansion of our Golike franchise into the United States, of which there can be no assurance, we could reach operating cash flow-positive operations during 2024. There can be no assurance whether our estimates will be accurate or whether we will ever achieve cash flow-positive operations.

Accelerated growth strategy, potential milestone payments, and acquisitions will require significant additional funding. We may also need to raise additional funds due to various factors such as the scope and rate of progress of our development activities, regulatory approval outcomes and emergence of competing technologies, among others. There can be no assurance that our commercialization efforts will be successful or if we need additional funding in the future, whether such funding will be available to us.

We expect that we will require additional capital to develop and commercialize certain of our product candidates. If we receive regulatory approval for our current and future product candidates, and if we have not already licensed such product candidate to a collaboration partner and choose to commercialize such product candidate independently, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, sales, marketing, distribution and establishing a regulatory structure, depending on where we choose to commercialize. Additional funds may not be available on a timely basis, on favorable terms, or at all, and such funds, if raised, may not be sufficient to enable us to continue to implement our long-term business strategy. Additionally, we may be dependent on the status of the capital markets at the time such capital is sought. If we are not able to raise capital when needed, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our shareholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our intellectual property or future revenue streams.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our liquidity needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, grants, and license and development agreements in connection with collaborations. We do not have any material committed external source of funds. In the event we need to seek additional funds, we may raise additional capital through the sale of equity, convertible debt or other securities, and through drawdowns from our Share Subscription Facility in place with GEM Global Yield LLC SCS (“GEM”). In such an event, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a holder of our Shares. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or proposing dividends to our shareholders.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances, or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to grant or otherwise relinquish valuable rights to our intellectual property or future revenue streams.

Our ability to use tax loss carry-forwards may be limited.

As of December 31, 2021, we had consolidated tax loss carry-forwards for purposes of Swiss corporate income tax in the aggregate amount of approximately CHF 136.4 million, which could be available to offset future taxable income. If not used, these tax losses will expire seven years after the year in which they were incurred. Due to our limited income, there is a high risk that the tax loss carryforwards will expire partly or entirely and we will not be able to use them to offset future taxable income thereafter for corporate income tax purposes. Further, taxable income generated by an entity of the group may only be offset against carried forward losses incurred by the same entity, hence reducing the overall likelihood of benefiting from these losses.

34

Exchange rate fluctuations may materially affect our results of operations and financial condition.

As our reporting currency is the Swiss franc, transactions and balance sheet items denominated in foreign currencies are converted into Swiss francs at the applicable exchange rates. Our current expenses are denominated in Swiss francs, U.S. Dollars and Euros. In the future, we expect that the majority of our revenue and expenses will be in U.S. Dollars and Euros. Therefore, unfavorable developments in the value of the Swiss franc as compared to the U.S. Dollar and Euro could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risks related to regulation of our business

The SIX Exchange Regulation AG has launched an investigation into Relief, the results of which are uncertain.

We have recently been notified by SIX Exchange Regulation AG – the self-regulatory supervisory body for issuers listed on the SIX Swiss Exchange – of a formal investigation due to potential violations of the rules on ad-hoc publicity. While we do not believe that this investigation will have a material adverse effect on our business, there can be no assurance of that conclusion.

We cannot give any assurance that any of our product candidates in development will receive regulatory approval, which is necessary before they can be commercialized.

We cannot be certain that any of our product candidates in development will be successful in clinical studies or receive regulatory approval. Applications for our product candidates could fail to receive regulatory approval for many reasons, including but not limited to the following:

35

We generally plan to seek regulatory approval to commercialize our product candidates in the U.S., the EU, Switzerland and in additional foreign countries where we have commercial and typically IP rights. To obtain regulatory approval in other countries, we must comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of such other countries regarding safety, efficacy, chemistry, manufacturing and controls, clinical studies, commercial sales, pricing, marketing and distribution of our product candidates. Even if we are successful in obtaining approval in one jurisdiction, we cannot ensure that we will obtain approval in any other jurisdictions. Failure to obtain marketing authorization for our product candidates will result in our being unable to market and sell such products, which would materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. If we fail to obtain approval in any jurisdiction, the geographic market for our product candidates could be limited.

Similarly, regulatory agencies may not approve the labeling claims that are necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of our product candidates.

Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain timelines and uncertain outcomes. If clinical studies of our product candidates are prolonged or delayed, we may be unable to obtain required regulatory approvals, and therefore be unable to commercialize our product candidates on a timely basis or at all.

In order to commercialize any of our product candidates, we or our partners must obtain the necessary regulatory approvals to market and sell such product. To obtain that approval, we must demonstrate through extensive preclinical and clinical studies that our products are safe and effective in humans. Clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the clinical study process. The results of preclinical and early clinical studies of our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical studies. For example, the positive results generated to date in clinical studies for our product candidates do not ensure that later clinical studies will demonstrate similar results. Product candidates in later stages of clinical studies may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having progressed through preclinical studies and initial clinical studies. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical industry, including us, have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical studies due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in earlier studies. Our future clinical study results may not be successful.

Clinical studies must be conducted in accordance with the legal requirements, regulations or guidelines of the FDA, EMA, Swissmedic and comparable regulatory authorities, and are subject to oversight by these governmental agencies and Institutional Review Boards (“IRBs”) at the medical institutions where the clinical studies are conducted. In addition, clinical studies must be conducted with supplies of our product candidates produced under cGMP and other requirements. We depend on medical institutions and CROs to conduct our clinical studies in compliance with cGCP standards. To the extent the CROs fail to enroll participants for our clinical studies, fail to conduct the study to cGCP standards or are delayed for a significant time in the execution of studies, including achieving full enrollment, we may be affected by increased costs, program delays or both, which may harm our business.

The completion of clinical studies for our clinical product candidates may be delayed, suspended or terminated as a result of many factors, including but not limited to:

36

Any delays in completing our clinical studies will increase our costs, slow our product candidate development and approval process, and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate sales revenues. Any of these occurrences may significantly harm our business, financial condition and prospects. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical studies may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of certain of our product candidates.

37

Even if we obtain and maintain approval for certain of our drug candidates from one jurisdiction, we may never obtain approval for our drug candidates in other jurisdictions, which would limit our market opportunities and adversely affect our business.

Sales of our approved drugs will be subject to U.S. and non-U.S. regulatory requirements governing clinical studies and regulatory approval, and we plan to seek regulatory approval to commercialize our drug candidates in the U.S., the European Economic Area (“EEA”), Switzerland and other countries. Clinical studies conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries, and regulatory approval in one country does not ensure approval in any other country, while a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in others. For example, approval in the U.S. by the FDA does not ensure approval by the regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and similarly, approval by a non-U.S. regulatory authority, such as the EMA, does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries, including by the FDA. However, the failure to obtain approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative impact on our ability to obtain approval elsewhere. Approval processes and regulatory requirements vary among countries and can involve additional drug testing and validation and additional administrative review periods. Even if a drug is approved, the FDA or EMA, as the case may be, may limit the indications for which the drug may be marketed, require extensive warnings on the drug labeling, or require expensive and time-consuming clinical studies or reporting as conditions of approval. In many countries outside the U.S., a drug candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that country. In some cases, the price that would be charged for a drug is also subject to approval. Regulatory authorities in other countries also have their own requirements for approval of drug candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing in those countries. Obtaining non-U.S. regulatory approvals and compliance with such non-U.S. regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our current and any future drugs, in certain countries. If we fail to comply with regulatory requirements in international markets or to obtain and maintain required approvals, or if regulatory approvals in international markets are delayed, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our drug candidates will be unrealized.

Even if certain of our product candidates obtain regulatory approval, we will be subject to ongoing obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expenses. Additionally, our additional product candidates, if approved, could be subject to labeling and other restrictions and market withdrawal and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or experience unanticipated problems with our products.

If marketing authorization is obtained for certain of our product candidates, the products will remain subject to continual regulatory review and therefore authorization could be subsequently withdrawn or restricted. Any regulatory approvals that we receive for certain of our product candidates may also be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the products may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including phase 4 clinical studies, and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. In addition, if the FDA or a comparable regulatory authority approves any of our product candidates in development, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and oversight by regulatory authorities, including with respect to the manufacturing processes, labeling, packing, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising and marketing restrictions, and record-keeping and, potentially, other post-marketing obligations, all of which may result in significant expense and limit our or our collaboration partners’ ability to commercialize such products. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMP and cGCP requirements for any clinical studies that we conduct post-approval. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including AEs of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

38

If any of these events occurs, our ability to sell such product may be impaired, and we may incur substantial additional expense to comply with regulatory requirements, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Regulatory policies may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained, which would adversely affect our business, prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability.

We have conducted and may in the future conduct clinical studies for our drug candidates outside the U.S., Europe and Switzerland, and the FDA, EMA and Swissmedic and applicable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from such studies.

We, or our collaboration partners, have conducted and may in the future choose to conduct one or more of our clinical studies outside the U.S., Europe and Switzerland. The acceptance of study data from clinical studies conducted outside the U.S., Europe and Switzerland or another jurisdiction by the FDA, EMA and Swissmedic or applicable foreign regulatory authority may be subject to certain conditions. In cases where data from foreign clinical studies are intended to serve as the basis for marketing approval, for instance in the U.S., the FDA will not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless the following are true: the data are applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice; the studies were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence; and the data are considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. Additionally, the FDA’s clinical study requirements, including sufficient size of patient populations and statistical powering, must be met. Many foreign regulatory bodies have similar requirements. In addition, such foreign studies would be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions in which the studies are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA, EMA, Swissmedic or any applicable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from studies conducted outside of the U.S. or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA, EMA, Swissmedic or any applicable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional studies, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of our business plan, and which may result in our drugs or drug candidates not receiving approval or clearance for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.

Our business is subject to complex and evolving U.S. and international laws and regulations regarding clinical trials reimbursement and privacy and data protection. Many of these laws and regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation and could result in claims, changes to our business practices, penalties, increased cost of operations, or declines in user growth or engagement, or otherwise harm our business.

Regulatory authorities around the world have adopted laws and regulations, and are continuing to consider a number of legislative and regulatory proposals, concerning privacy and data protection, including measures to ensure that encryption of users’ data does not hinder access of law enforcement agencies to that data. In addition, the interpretation and application of consumer and data protection laws in the U.S., Europe, Switzerland and elsewhere are often uncertain and in flux. It is possible that these laws may be interpreted and applied in a manner that is inconsistent with our data practices. These laws and regulations, and legislative and regulatory proposals, if adopted, and such interpretations could, in addition to the possibility of fines, result in an order requiring that we change our data practices, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Complying with these various laws could cause us to incur substantial costs or require us to change our business practices in a manner adverse to our business.

39

In the EU, new clinical trial regulations came into force on January 31, 2022. This new legislation enforces the centralization of clinical trial applications and approvals, New clinical trial sponsors must begin using the new system by January 31, 2023, and any previously approved trial sponsors must comply from January 31, 2025, but in some cases, this may extend timelines for clinical study approvals, due to potentially longer wait times enabling sponsors to apply for trial authorization in up to 30 European countries with a single online application. The General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”), which became effective in May 2018 in all EU member states, created a range of new compliance obligations for companies that process the personal data of EU residents. Although it is expected that the GDPR will provide consistency across the territory of the EU, it imposes more onerous requirements concerning consent and the obligations of sponsors of clinical trials (acting as data controllers), among other measures, which may increase the costs and extend the timelines of our product development efforts. Austerity measures in certain European nations may also affect the prices we are able to seek if our products are approved, as discussed below. Furthermore, the Brexit vote and the impact of the withdrawal of the UK may adversely affect business activity, political stability and economic conditions in the UK, the Eurozone, the EU and elsewhere. Specifically, Brexit and ongoing developments in the UK have created uncertainty with regard to data protection regulation in the UK. We may be required to comply with both the GDPR and the UK GDPR, exposing us to two parallel regimes with potentially divergent interpretations and enforcement actions for certain violations. The relationship between the UK and the EU in relation to certain aspects of data protection law remains unclear, for example, how data transfers between EU member states and the UK will be treated and the role of the UK’s Information Commissioner’s Office with respect to the EU following the end of the transitional period. Although we do not have material operations in the UK, we cannot rule out potential disruptions in relation to the clinical regulatory framework applicable to our clinical studies in the UK, and to data privacy and security rules with respect to personal data sharing with vendors and clinical investigators in the UK, and we cannot predict future implications.

Both in the U.S. and in the EU, legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional activities for pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products. We do not know whether additional legislative changes will be enacted, whether the regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what the impact of such changes on the marketing approvals of our product candidates, if any, may be.

We could be subject to liabilities under environmental, health and safety laws or regulations, or fines, penalties or other sanctions, if we fail to comply with such laws or regulations or otherwise incur costs that could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws, regulations, and permitting requirements, including those governing laboratory procedures, decontamination activities, and the handling, transportation, use, remediation, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials, human substances and wastes. Our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological materials that produce hazardous waste products. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials or wastes either at our sites or at third-party disposal sites. In the event of such contamination or injury, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties. Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, human substances or other work-related injuries, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities.

In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws, regulations or permitting requirements. Such laws, regulations and requirements are becoming increasingly more stringent and may impair our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and permitting requirements also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.

Our relationships with clinical centers, customers and payors will be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, which, if violated, could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, exclusion from government healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings.

40

Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and safe harbors available under the U.S. federal Anti-Kickback Statute, it is possible that some of our future business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. In addition, recent healthcare-reform legislation has strengthened these laws. For example, the Health Care Reform Law, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal anti-kickback and criminal healthcare fraud statutes. A person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it. Moreover, the Health Care Reform Law provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal anti-kickback statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act.

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from U.S. government-funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, other foreign healthcare reimbursement and procurement programs, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of the physicians or other providers or entities with whom we expect to do business with is found to be not in compliance with applicable laws, they may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government-funded healthcare programs.

41

Risks from the improper conduct of employees, agents, contractors, or collaborators could adversely affect our reputation and our business, prospects, operating results, and financial condition.

We cannot ensure that our compliance controls, policies, and procedures will in every instance protect us from acts committed by our employees, agents, contractors, or collaborators, which would violate the laws or regulations of the jurisdictions in which we operate, including, without limitation, healthcare, employment, foreign corrupt practices, environmental, competition, and patient privacy and other privacy laws and regulations. Such improper actions could subject us to civil or criminal investigations, and monetary and injunctive penalties, and could adversely impact our operating results, our ability to conduct business and our reputation.

We are exposed to the risk of employee fraud or other misconduct. Misconduct by employees could include intentional failures to comply with FDA or EMA regulations, to provide accurate information to the FDA or the EMA, or intentional failures to report financial information or data accurately or to disclose unauthorized activities to us. Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical studies, which could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation. While we take precautions to detect and prevent this activity, it may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.

Our business activities may be subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and similar anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws.

Our business activities may be subject to the FCPA and similar anti-bribery or anti-corruption laws, regulations or rules of other countries in which we operate, including the UK Bribery Act. The FCPA generally prohibits offering, promising, giving or authorizing others to give anything of value, either directly or indirectly, to a non-U.S. government official in order to influence official action, or otherwise obtain or retain business. The FCPA also requires public companies to make and keep books and records that accurately and fairly reflect the transactions of the corporation, and to devise and maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls. Our business is heavily regulated and therefore involves significant interaction with public officials. including officials of non-U.S. governments. Additionally, in many other countries, the healthcare providers who prescribe pharmaceuticals or biopharmaceuticals and the investigators who perform our studies are employed by their government, and the purchasers of pharmaceuticals are government entities; therefore, our dealings with these prescribers and purchasers are subject to regulation under the FCPA. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and the Department of Justice have increased their FCPA enforcement activities with respect to pharmaceutical companies. There is no certainty that all of our employees, agents, contractors or collaborators, or those of our affiliates, will comply with all applicable laws and regulations, particularly given the high level of complexity of these laws. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in fines, criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, the closing down of our facilities, requirements to obtain export licenses, cessation of business activities in sanctioned countries, implementation of compliance programs, and prohibitions on the conduct of our business. Any such violations could include prohibitions on our ability to offer our products in one or more countries and could materially damage our reputation, our brand, our international expansion efforts, our ability to attract and retain employees, and our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition.

42

Risks related to our common shares and our ADRs

We do not know whether an active, liquid and ordinary trading market will develop for our ADRs or what the market price of our ADRs will be. As a result, it may be difficult for you to sell your ADRs.

While our ordinary shares have traded on the SIX Swiss Exchange since 2009, our recently enacted ADR program constitutes the first opportunity to purchase our ADRs in the United States. Our ADRs recently began trading over-the-counter, and we intend to apply to list our ADRs on the NASDAQ Stock Market in the future. Until our ADRs are listed on NASDAQ, they will continue to be traded on the over-the-counter market. Until our ADRs are listed on NASDAQ, it may be more difficult for holders to sell the ADRs. There can be no assurance that an active trading market for the ADRs will develop or be sustained after this registration is completed or that we will be successful in listing our ADRs on NASDAQ.

The market price of our common shares is volatile and may fluctuate due to factors beyond our control, and the market for our ADRs is likely to be similarly volatile

The market price of our common shares is volatile and the market for our ADRs is likely to be similarly volatile. The stock market in general, and the market for biopharmaceutical companies in particular, has experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. As a result of this volatility, you may not be able to sell your ordinary shares or your ADRs at or above the purchase price. The market price for our common shares is, and the market for our ADRs is likely to be, influenced by many factors, including:

Broad market and industry factors may materially affect the market price of companies’ stock, including ours, regardless of actual operating performance. Furthermore, issuers such as ourselves, whose securities have historically had limited trading volumes and/or have been susceptible to relatively high volatility levels, can be particularly vulnerable to short-seller attacks and trading in our common shares by non-fundamental investors such as hedge funds and others who may enter and exit positions in our common shares frequently and suddenly, causing increased volatility of our share price. Short selling is the practice of selling securities that the seller does not own but rather has borrowed or intends to borrow from a third party with the intention of buying identical securities at a later date to return to the lender, and profit from a decline in the value of the securities in the process. The publication of any commentary by short sellers with the intent of creating negative market momentum may bring about a temporary, or possibly long-term, decline in the market price of our common stock.

43

Future sales, or the possibility of future sales, of a substantial number of our common shares could adversely affect the price of our common shares.

Future sales of a substantial number of our ADRs, or the perception that such sales will occur, could cause a decline in the market price of our ADRs. If certain of our shareholders sell substantial amounts of common shares in the public market, or the market perceives that such sales may occur, the market price of our common shares and our ability to raise capital through an issue of equity securities in the future could be adversely affected. If a large number of our ADRs are sold in the public market after they become eligible for sale, the sales could reduce the trading price of our common shares and impede our ability to raise future capital.

Holders of ADRs are not treated as holders of our ordinary shares.

After purchasing an ADR, you will become a holder of ADRs with underlying ordinary shares in a company incorporated under Swiss law. Holders of ADRs are not treated as holders of our ordinary shares, unless they withdraw the ordinary shares underlying their ADRs in accordance with the deposit agreement and applicable laws and regulations. The depositary is the holder of the ordinary shares underlying the ADRs. Holders of ADRs therefore do not have any rights as holders of our ordinary shares, other than the rights that they have pursuant to the deposit agreement. See “Description of American Depositary Shares.”

You will not have the same voting rights as holders of our ordinary shares and may not receive voting materials in time to exercise your right to vote.

Except as described in this registration statement and the deposit agreement, holders of the ADRs will not be able to exercise voting rights attaching to the ordinary shares represented by the ADRs. Under the terms of the deposit agreement, holders of the ADRs may instruct the depositary to vote the ordinary shares underlying their ADRs. Otherwise, holders of ADRs will not be able to exercise their right to vote unless they withdraw the ordinary shares underlying their ADRs to vote them in person or by proxy in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and our Articles of Association. Even so, ADR holders may not know about a meeting far enough in advance to withdraw those ordinary shares. If we ask for the instructions of holders of the ADRs, the depositary, upon timely notice from us, will notify ADR holders of the upcoming vote and arrange to deliver our voting materials to them. Upon our request, the depositary will mail to holders a shareholder meeting notice that contains, among other things, a statement as to the manner in which voting instructions may be given. We cannot guarantee that ADR holders will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that they can instruct the depositary to vote the ordinary shares underlying their ADRs. A shareholder is only entitled to participate in, and vote at, the meeting of shareholders, provided that it holds our ordinary shares as of the record date set for such meeting and otherwise complies with our Articles of Association. In addition, the depositary’s liability to ADR holders for failing to execute voting instructions or for the manner of executing voting instructions is limited by the deposit agreement. As a result, holders of ADRs may not be able to exercise their right to give voting instructions or to vote in person or by proxy and they may not have any recourse against the depositary or us if their ordinary shares are not voted as they have requested or if their shares cannot be voted.

44

You may not receive distributions on our ordinary shares represented by ADRs or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical to make them available to holders of ADRs.

The depositary for the ADRs has agreed to pay to you any cash dividends or other distributions it or the custodian receives on our ordinary shares or other deposited securities after deducting its fees and expenses. You will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of our ordinary shares your ADRs represent. However, in accordance with the limitations set forth in the deposit agreement, it may be unlawful or impractical to make a distribution available to holders of ADRs. We have no obligation to take any other action to permit distribution on the ADRs, ordinary shares, rights or anything else to holders of the ADRs. This means that you may not receive the distributions we make on our ordinary shares or any value from them if it is unlawful or impractical to make them available to you. These restrictions may have an adverse effect on the value of your ADRs.

We are a foreign private issuer and, as a result, we are not subject to U.S. proxy rules and are subject to Exchange Act reporting obligations that, to some extent, are more lenient and less frequent than those of a U.S. domestic public company.

We are reporting under the Exchange Act as a non-U.S. company with foreign private issuer status. Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act and although we are subject to Swiss laws and regulations with regard to such matters, we are exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. domestic public companies, including (i) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act; (ii) the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and their liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time; and (iii) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial and other specified information, or of current reports on Form 8-K, upon the occurrence of specified significant events. In addition, foreign private issuers are not required to file their annual report on Form 20-F until four months after the end of each financial year, whereas U.S. domestic issuers that are accelerated filers are required to file their annual report on Form 10-K within 75 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers are also exempt from the Regulation Fair Disclosure, aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information. As a result of the above, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are not foreign private issuers.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and there are reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies, above and beyond the reduced disclosure requirements we have as a Foreign Private Issuer.

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the SEC’s rules and regulations and we will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier to occur of (1) the last day of 2025, (2) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenues of at least $1.07 billion, (3) the last day of the fiscal year in which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer,” under the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which means the market value of our equity securities that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30th, or (4) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. For so long as we remain an emerging growth company, we are permitted and intend to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies. These exemptions include:

45

We may choose to take advantage of some, but not all, of the available exemptions. We have taken advantage of reduced reporting burdens in this registration statement. In particular, we have not included all of the executive compensation information that would be required if we were not an emerging growth company. We cannot predict whether investors will find our ADRs less attractive if we rely on certain or all of these exemptions. If some investors find our ADRs less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our ADRs and our ADR price may be more volatile.

In addition, the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 provides that an emerging growth company may take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. This allows an emerging growth company to delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We are considering whether we will take advantage of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Since IFRS makes no distinction between public and private companies for purposes of compliance with new or revised accounting standards, the requirements for our compliance as a private company and as a public company are the same.

Even after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we may still qualify as a “smaller reporting company” if the market value of our ordinary shares held by non-affiliates is below $250 million (or $700 million if our annual revenue is less than $100 million) as of June 30 in any given year, which would allow us to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements, including reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements.

One of our principal shareholders has a significant holding in the company which may give them influence in certain matters requiring approval by shareholders, including approval of significant corporate transactions in certain circumstances.

As reported to the SIX Swiss Exchange, GEM Global Yield LLC SCS, Luxembourg, Luxembourg (26.24% of the registered share capital of the Company) is the only shareholder that holds more than 3% of the registered share capital of the Company. This shareholding percentage excludes derivatives holdings and is reported as published in the SIX database as of the date of this Registration Statement.

GEM or other major shareholders, alone or acting in concert with third parties, would be able to exert significant influence over, or in some cases to decide or block, certain matters that must be decided by a vote of the shareholders, including the election of members to the Board of Directors of the Company or the declaration of dividends or other distributions. To the extent that the interests of these shareholders may differ from the interests of the Company’s other shareholders, the Company’s other shareholders may be disadvantaged by any actions that these shareholders may seek to pursue.

46

We have broad discretion in the use of our cash and cash equivalents and short-term financial assets and may not use them effectively.

Our management has broad discretion in the application of our cash and cash equivalents and short-term financial assets. Our or our collaboration partners’ decisions concerning the allocation of research, development, collaboration, management and financial resources toward particular product candidates or therapeutic areas may not lead to the development of any viable commercial product and may divert resources away from better opportunities. If we make incorrect determinations regarding the viability or market potential of any of our programs or product candidates or misread trends in the pharmaceutical or biopharmaceutical industry, in particular for neurodegenerative diseases, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. As a result, we may fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities, be required to forego or delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or other diseases and disease pathways that may later prove to have greater commercial potential than those we choose to pursue, or relinquish valuable rights to such product candidates through collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been advantageous for us to invest additional resources to retain sole development and commercialization rights.

We have not in the past paid dividends and we do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have not paid any dividends since our incorporation. Even if future operations lead to significant levels of distributable profits, we currently intend that any earnings will be reinvested in our business and that dividends will not be paid until we have an established revenue stream to support continuing dividends. Under our articles of association, the declaration of dividends requires a resolution passed by a simple majority of the votes cast at a shareholders’ meeting regardless of abstentions and empty or invalid votes. The proposal to pay future dividends to shareholders will in addition effectively be at the discretion of our board of directors after considering various factors including our business prospects, liquidity requirements, financial performance and new product development. In addition, payment of future dividends is subject to certain limitation pursuant to Swiss law or by our articles of association. Accordingly, investors cannot rely on dividend income from our common shares and any returns on an investment in our common shares will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation in the price of our common shares.

We are a Swiss corporation. The rights of our shareholders may be different from the rights of shareholders in companies governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions.

We are a Swiss corporation. Our corporate affairs are governed by our articles of association and by the laws governing companies, including listed companies, incorporated in Switzerland. The rights of our shareholders and the responsibilities of members of our board of directors may be different from the rights and obligations of shareholders and directors of companies governed by the laws of U.S. jurisdictions. In the performance of its duties, our board of directors is required by Swiss law to consider the interests of our Company, our shareholders, our employees and other stakeholders in all cases, with due observation of the principles of reasonableness and fairness. It is possible that some of these parties will have interests that are different from, or in addition to, your interests as a shareholder. Swiss corporate law limits the ability of our shareholders to challenge resolutions made or other actions taken by our board of directors in court. Our shareholders generally are not permitted to file a suit to reverse a decision or an action taken by our board of directors but are instead only permitted to seek damages for breaches of fiduciary duty. As a matter of Swiss law, shareholder claims against a member of our board of directors for breach of fiduciary duty would have to be brought in Geneva, Switzerland, or the country in which the relevant member of our board of directors is domiciled. In addition, under Swiss law, any claims by our shareholders against us must be brought exclusively in Geneva, Switzerland (except for certain U.S. securities and other claims that may be brought in U.S. federal court).

47

Our status as a Swiss corporation may limit our flexibility with respect to certain aspects of capital management and may cause us to be unable to make distributions without subjecting our shareholders to Swiss withholding tax.

Swiss law allows our shareholders to authorize share capital that can be issued by the board of directors without additional shareholder approval. This authorization is limited to 50% of the existing registered share capital and must be renewed by the shareholders every 2 years. Further, our articles of association provide for conditional share capital (up to a maximum of 50% of the ordinary share capital) for the purpose of issuing shares in connection with, among other things, (i) conversion or option rights, or (ii) to our employees, members of our board of directors, consultants, our subsidiaries or other persons. Additionally, as a principle, Swiss law grants pre-emptive subscription rights to existing shareholders to subscribe to any new issuance of shares. Any common share capital increase resolution preserving pre-emptive subscription rights expires after 3 months and requires a simple majority of the votes cast at the shareholder’s meeting regardless of abstentions and empty or invalid votes. Swiss law also does not provide as much flexibility in the various terms that can attach to different classes of shares as do the laws of some other jurisdictions. Swiss law also reserves for approval by shareholders certain corporate actions over which a board of directors would have authority in some other jurisdictions. For example, dividends must be approved by shareholders. These Swiss law requirements relating to our capital management may limit our flexibility, and situations may arise in which greater flexibility would have provided substantial benefits to our shareholders.

Under Swiss law, a Swiss corporation may pay dividends only if the corporation has sufficient distributable profits from previous fiscal years, or if the corporation has distributable reserves, each as evidenced by its audited statutory balance sheet. Freely distributable reserves are generally booked either as “free reserves” or as “capital contributions” (apports de capital, contributions received from shareholders) in the “reserve from capital contributions.” Distributions may be made out of issued share capital only by way of a capital reduction. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had
CHF 304.9 million of reserves from capital contributions and approximately CHF 44.1 million of issued share capital (consisting of 4,413,334,617 common shares each with a par value of CHF 0.01 and no preferred shares) on its statutory balance sheet. Of the total issued shares and issued share capital, the Company held 299,867,357 fully paid-in treasury shares representing CHF 2.9 million of issued share capital at nominal value.

We expect the aggregate of these amounts (less the lowest legally possible issued share capital and legal reserve of together CHF 150,000) to represent the amount available for future dividends or capital reductions on a Swiss withholding tax-free basis. We will not be able to pay dividends or make other distributions to shareholders on a Swiss withholding tax-free basis in excess of that amount unless the Company increases its share capital or its reserves from capital contributions. We would also be able to pay dividends out of distributable profits or freely distributable reserves but such dividends would be subject to Swiss withholding taxes. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient distributable profits, free reserves, reserves from capital contributions or registered share capital to pay a dividend or effect a capital reduction, that our shareholders will approve dividends or capital reductions proposed by us, or that we will be able to meet the other legal requirements for dividend payments or distributions as a result of capital reductions.

Generally, Swiss withholding tax of 35% is due on dividends and similar distributions to our shareholders, regardless of the place of residency of the shareholder, unless the distribution is made to shareholders out of (i) a reduction of nominal value or (ii) assuming certain conditions are met, reserves from capital contributions accumulated on or after January 1, 1997. A U.S. Holder who qualifies for benefits under the Convention Between the United States of America and the Swiss Confederation for the Avoidance of Double Taxation with Respect to Taxes on Income, which we refer to as the “U.S.-Swiss Treaty,” may apply for a refund of the tax withheld in excess of the 15% treaty rate (or in excess of the 5% reduced treaty rate for qualifying corporate shareholders with at least 10% participation in our voting stock, or for a full refund in the case of qualified pension funds). There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient reserves from capital contributions to pay dividends free from Swiss withholding tax, or that Swiss withholding tax rules will not be changed in the future. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that the current Swiss law with respect to distributions out of reserves from capital contributions will not be changed or that a change in Swiss law will not adversely affect us or our shareholders, in particular as a result of distributions out of reserves from capital contributions becoming subject to additional corporate law or other restrictions. In addition, over the long term, the amount of par value available to us for nominal value reductions or reserves from capital contributions available to us to pay out as distributions is limited. If we are unable to make a distribution through a reduction in nominal value or out of reserves from capital contributions, we may not be able to make distributions without subjecting our shareholders to Swiss withholding taxes.

48

U.S. shareholders may not be able to obtain judgments or enforce civil liabilities against us or our executive officers or members of our board of directors.

We are organized under the laws of Switzerland and our registered office and domicile is located in Geneva, Switzerland. Moreover, a number of our directors and executive officers are not residents of the U.S., and all or a substantial portion of the assets of such persons are located outside the U.S. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the U.S. upon us or upon such persons or to enforce against them judgments obtained in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the U.S.. We have been advised by our Swiss counsel that there is doubt as to the enforceability in Switzerland of original actions, or of actions for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts, for civil liabilities to the extent solely predicated upon the federal and state securities laws of the U.S. Original actions against persons in Switzerland based solely upon the U.S. federal or state securities laws are governed, among other things, by the principles set forth in the Swiss Federal Act on Private International Law. This statute provides that the application of provisions of non-Swiss law by the courts in Switzerland shall be precluded if the result is incompatible with Swiss public policy. Additionally, certain mandatory provisions of Swiss law may be applicable regardless of any other law that would otherwise apply.

Switzerland and the U.S. do not have a treaty providing for reciprocal recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. The recognition and enforcement of a judgment of the courts of the U.S. in Switzerland is governed by the principles set forth in the Swiss Federal Act on Private International Law. This statute provides in principle that a judgment rendered by a non-Swiss court may be enforced in Switzerland only if:

Our status as a Swiss corporation means that our shareholders enjoy certain rights that may limit our flexibility to raise capital, issue dividends and otherwise manage ongoing capital needs.

Swiss law reserves for approval by shareholders certain corporate actions over which a board of directors would have authority in some other jurisdictions. For example, the payment of dividends and cancellation of treasury shares must be approved by shareholders. Swiss law also requires that our shareholders themselves resolve, or authorize our board of directors, to increase our share capital. Although our shareholders may authorize share capital that can be issued by our board of directors without additional shareholder approval, Swiss law limits this authorization to 50% of the issued share capital at the time of the authorization. The authorization, furthermore, has a limited duration of up to two years and must be renewed by the shareholders from time to time thereafter in order to be available for raising capital. Additionally, subject to specified exceptions, including exceptions explicitly described in our articles of association, Swiss law grants pre-emptive subscription rights to existing shareholders to subscribe for new issuances of shares. Swiss law also does not provide as much flexibility in the various rights and regulations that can attach to different categories of shares as do the laws of some other jurisdictions. These Swiss law requirements relating to our capital management may limit our flexibility, and situations may arise where greater flexibility would have provided benefits to our shareholders.

49

Swiss law restricts our ability to pay dividends.

The proposal to pay future dividends to shareholders will effectively be at the discretion of our board of directors and subject to approval by, at their discretion, our shareholders after considering various factors including our business prospects, liquidity requirements, financial performance and new product development.

In addition, payment of future dividends is subject to certain limitations pursuant to Swiss law or our articles of association. Investors cannot rely on dividend income from our common shares and any returns on an investment in our common shares will likely depend entirely upon any future appreciation in the price of our common shares. Dividends paid on our common shares are subject to Swiss Federal withholding tax, except if paid out of reserves from capital contributions (apports de capital).

See “Item 10. Additional information- E. Taxation—Swiss tax considerations” for a summary of certain Swiss tax consequences regarding dividends distributed to holders of our common shares.

Shareholders in countries with a currency other than Swiss Francs face additional investment risks from currency exchange rate fluctuations in connection with their holding of our common shares.

Any future payments of dividends, if any, will likely be denominated in Swiss Francs. The foreign currency equivalent of any dividend, if any, paid on our common shares or received in connection with any sale of our common shares could be adversely affected by the depreciation of the Swiss Franc against such other currency.

As a foreign private issuer and as permitted by the listing requirements of Nasdaq, we rely on certain home country governance practices rather than the corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq.

We are a foreign private issuer. If we are successful in listing our ADRs on the Nasdaq Stock Market, as a result, in accordance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5615(a)(3), we will comply with Swiss governance requirements and certain exemptions thereunder rather than complying with certain of the corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq. Swiss law does not require that a majority of our board of directors consist of independent directors. Our board of directors therefore may include fewer independent directors than would be required if we were subject to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(b)(1). In addition, we are not subject to Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(b)(2), which requires that independent directors regularly have scheduled meetings at which only independent directors are present.

Although Swiss law also requires that we adopt a compensation committee, we follow home country requirements with respect to such committee and our compensation, nomination and corporate governance committee is tasked with certain director nomination and governance responsibilities as described under “Item 6. Directors, senior management and employees.” As a result, our practice varies from the requirements of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(d), which sets forth certain requirements as to the responsibilities, composition and independence of compensation committees, and from the independent director oversight of director nominations requirements of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5605(e).

50

Furthermore, in accordance with Swiss law and generally accepted business practices, our articles of association do not provide quorum requirements generally applicable to general meetings of shareholders. Our practice thus varies from the requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5620(c), which requires an issuer to provide in its bylaws for a generally applicable quorum, and that such quorum may not be less than one-third of the outstanding voting stock. Our articles of association provide for an independent proxy holder elected by our shareholders, who may represent our shareholders at a general meeting of shareholders, and we must provide shareholders with an agenda and other relevant documents for the general meeting of shareholders. Our practice varies from the requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5620(b), which sets forth certain requirements regarding the solicitation of proxies. In addition, we have opted out of shareholder approval requirements for the issuance of securities in connection with certain events such as the acquisition of stock or assets of another company, the establishment of or amendments to equity-based compensation plans for employees, a change of control of us, and certain private placements. To this extent, our practice varies from the requirements of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635, which generally requires an issuer to obtain shareholder approval for the issuance of securities in connection with such events.

For an overview of our corporate governance principles, see “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees.” As a result of the above, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are not foreign private issuers.

We may lose our foreign private issuer status, which would then require us to comply with the Exchange Act’s domestic reporting regime and cause us to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses.

We are a foreign private issuer and therefore we are not required to comply with all of the periodic disclosure and current reporting requirements of the Exchange Act applicable to U.S. domestic issuers. In order to maintain our current status as a foreign private issuer, either (a) a majority of our common shares must be either directly or indirectly owned of record by non-residents of the U.S. or (b) (i) a majority of our executive officers or directors may not be U.S. citizens or residents, (ii) more than 50 percent of our assets cannot be located in the U.S. and (iii) our business must be administered principally outside the U.S. If we lost this status, we would be required to comply with the Exchange Act reporting and other requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, which are more detailed and extensive than the requirements for foreign private issuers. We may also be required to make changes in our corporate governance practices in accordance with various SEC and stock exchange rules. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws if we are required to comply with the reporting requirements applicable to a U.S. domestic issuer may be significantly higher than the cost we would incur as a foreign private issuer. As a result, we expect that a loss of foreign private issuer status would increase our legal and financial compliance costs and would make some activities highly time-consuming and costly. We also expect that if we were required to comply with the rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, it would make it more difficult and expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. These rules and regulations could also make it more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified members of our board of directors.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, shareholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of our common shares.

Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to prevent fraud, among other objectives. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us conducted in connection with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or any subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting, which are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or retroactive changes to our financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Inferior internal controls could also subject us to regulatory scrutiny and sanctions, impair our ability to raise revenue and cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common shares.

51

In March 2020, the SEC approved amendments to exempt from the requirements of Section 404(b) any companies with less than USD 100 million of revenue and less than USD 700 million of public float. These amendments provide that such companies are no longer required to obtain an attestation of their internal controls over financial reporting from an independent outside auditor, even if such companies are no longer “emerging growth companies.”

For as long as we are exempt from the requirement of Section 404(b) per the aforementioned SEC amendments adopted in March 2020, we may not be able to detect problems that an independent assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls could. Undetected material weaknesses in our internal controls could lead to financial statement restatements and require us to incur the expense of remediation.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research, about our business, the price of our common shares and our trading volume could decline.

The trading market for our common shares will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. If no or too few securities or industry analysts cover our company, the trading price for our common shares would likely be negatively affected. In addition, if one or more of the analysts who cover us downgrade our common shares or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the price of our common shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for our common shares could decrease, which might cause the price of our common shares and trading volume to decline.

52