April 4, 2023

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to attend the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders of Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. The meeting will be held on Monday, May 15, 2023, at 9:30 a.m., Eastern Time, in a virtual meeting format only. The Annual Meeting will be accessible solely by means of remote communication.

The attached proxy statement, with the accompanying notice of the meeting, describes the matters expected to be considered and voted upon at the meeting. We urge you to review these materials carefully and to take part in the affairs of our company by voting on the matters described in the proxy statement.

Your vote is important. To attend and participate in the meeting, you will need to register with the control number included on the notice or proxy card at www.proxydocs.com/EPRT prior to 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Sunday, May 14, 2023. Although you may vote online during the virtual annual meeting, we encourage you to vote via the internet, by telephone or by mail prior to the meeting, as outlined on your proxy card, to ensure that your shares are represented and voted. We look forward to your participation.

ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.

902 Carnegie Center Boulevard, Suite 520

Princeton, New Jersey 08540

(609) 436-0619

ESSENTIAL PROPERTIES REALTY TRUST, INC.

ii

2022 BUSINESS HIGHLIGHTS

most directly comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.

1

CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY

At Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc., we believe that responsible and effective corporate governance, a positive corporate culture, good corporate citizenship, and the promotion of sustainability initiatives are critical to our ability to create long-term stockholder value. We are committed to conducting our business in accordance with the highest ethical standards. We take our responsibilities to all of our stakeholders, including our stockholders, creditors, employees, tenants, and business relationships, very seriously. We are dedicated to being trusted stewards of capital and also providing our employees with a rewarding and dynamic work environment.

Overall, our commitment to Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) initiatives and our strategy for pursuing the goals we’ve established to demonstrate that commitment are based on the following key tenets:

Our ESG goals include the following:

2

Corporate Governance Practices

Our approach to ESG begins with strong corporate governance. We believe that the structure of our Board, its policies and practices and its oversight role are the overarching indicators of our commitment to accountability regarding ESG. We are committed to managing our Company for the benefit of all of our stakeholders and achieving long-term stockholder value. Maintaining effective corporate governance is a critical component of our Company.

Importantly, we have a Board that is diverse and independent, notably including, but not limited to, these key attributes:

We value diversity, not simply gender or minority representation, but experience and professional qualifications. Our Board leads by example in our ESG efforts.

The following are additional elements of our corporate governance that are key considerations underlying our commitment to ESG:

3

Ethical Business Practices. Our Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (which are available on our website) that applies to all of our officers, directors and employees. In addition, we have adopted other business and workplace policies that apply to all of our directors, officers, employees, vendors and service providers that seek to create a culture that values high ethical standards, including integrity, honesty, transparency and compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations. In addition, the following policies, all of which are available on our website, also reflect our commitment to ethical business practices:

Transparency in our Reporting and Disclosures. We are committed to being a leader in providing detailed public disclosure about our business, promoting transparency and accountability. Our commitment to robust and transparent disclosures includes, but is not limited to, our filings with the SEC, our quarterly earnings releases and the associated supplemental information reporting packages, our corporate responsibility report and our investor presentations. In 2022, we were awarded with the Gold level Communications and Reporting Excellence award (the “CARE Award”) for small cap REITs from the National Association for Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). NAREIT’s CARE Award, which evaluates a company’s online presence, filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and investor relations activities, recognizes publicly traded REITs that interact most effectively with their investors online, in writing and orally, as well as that provide their investors with the most comprehensive, clearly articulated and useful information in the most efficient manner.

Investor Engagement. We value investor input and are committed to maintaining an active dialogue with our investors through extensive outreach. During 2022, we held over 165 virtual or face-to-face meetings with investors in connection with or in addition to attending 11 industry/REIT conferences.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. We have adopted a stock ownership policy applicable to our executive officers and independent directors under which each individual is expected to maintain beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock (including securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock) with a value equal to a specified multiple of their annual base cash compensation.

No Hedging or Pledging. We have policies that prohibit our officers, directors and employees from hedging their investment in our stock, and prohibit our directors and executive officers from pledging or otherwise encumbering their investment in our securities as collateral for indebtedness.

Opted out of MUTA. We have opted out of certain provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law that may make it more difficult for or prevent a change in control. We have opted out of the control share acquisition and the business combination statutes in the Maryland General Corporation Law, and we may not opt back into these without stockholder approval. In addition, we are prohibited from adopting certain takeover protections, including classifying the Board, without first obtaining stockholder approval.

4

No “Poison Pill.” We do not maintain a stockholder rights plan (commonly referred to as a “poison pill”). We will not adopt one in the future without (a) the approval of our stockholders or (b) seeking ratification from our stockholders within 12 months after adoption of the plan if the Board determines, in the exercise of its duties under applicable law, that it is in the Company’s best interest to adopt a rights plan without the delay of seeking prior stockholder approval.

Risk Management Oversight. One of the key responsibilities of our Board is informed oversight of our risk management process. Our Board administers this oversight function directly, with support from its four standing committees, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Investment Committee, each of which is comprised solely of non-employee, independent directors and addresses risks specific to its respective areas of oversight.

Audit Committee. The principal functions of our Audit Committee include oversight relating to:

The Audit Committee is also responsible for engaging, evaluating, compensating and overseeing an independent registered public accounting firm charged with auditing our financial statements, reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the adequacy of our internal controls over financial reporting.

Compensation Committee. The principal functions of our Compensation Committee include:

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The principal functions of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include:

In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors our overall risk management process at an enterprise level, and periodically evaluates various risks and the processes in place to monitor and

5

mitigate such risks, including portfolio risks, operational risks, balance sheet risks and human capital risks. As a part of its oversight function, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also reviews quarterly management reports addressing various matters including ESG and governance matters, and our progress in achieving related objectives.

Investment Committee. The principal functions of our Investment Committee include:

Environmental Sustainability

We recognize that our commercial real estate assets can substantially impact the environment and the health and safety of building occupants. We believe that being aware of and addressing these issues are important aspects of maintaining a successful and sustainable business. Our commitment to environmental stewardship starts at our corporate headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey, and extends to our portfolio of income-producing properties, our investment and leasing practices, and to our tenants. We are committed to expanding and enhancing our efforts to incorporate sustainability initiatives in our corporate governance and applicable business processes, including underwriting our investments, asset management activities, and disclosure and reporting practices.

Our position on sustainability is that reducing our carbon footprint and, where possible, that of our tenants is a strategic imperative, not simply because we believe it’s the right thing to do, but because we believe it is consistent with our core business objective of maximizing stockholder value and it also provides opportunities for us to help our tenants produce operating efficiencies and customer attraction opportunities. We are committed to environmental stewardship and operating our business in a sustainable manner. Accordingly, our investment, leasing and asset management practices are informed by our commitment to operate in a sustainable manner that we believe will support long-term value.

We are focused on advancing and continuing to develop our sustainability agenda.

Our Properties. As a net-lease REIT, we do not control the day-to-day operations and activities at our properties that are leased to tenants. Generally, our tenants have exclusive control over, and the ability to institute energy conservation and environmental management programs at, our properties. While we are not able to mandate the sustainability practices of our tenants, our leases generally require our tenants to fully comply with all applicable environmental laws, rules and regulations, and our asset management department actively monitors our properties in an effort to ensure that tenants are meeting their obligations with respect to environmental matters. Prior to acquiring a property, we obtain a Phase I environmental site assessment to seek to identify any environmental issues and structure the related lease accordingly.

Our Green Lease. The properties in our portfolio are generally leased to our tenants under long-term triple net leases, which give our tenants exclusive control over and the ability to institute energy conservation and environmental management programs at our properties. In December 2021, we modified our standard lease form, which we use in our sale-leaseback transactions, to provide us with the contractual right to make sustainability improvements to our properties and to require our tenants to periodically provide us, at least annually, with information regarding their resource consumption, such as electricity and water usage. We believe that being aware of and, to the extent that we are able, addressing environmental issues are important aspects of maintaining a business that is successful and sustainable over the long-term. Accordingly, we believe that supporting our tenants’ efforts to implement sustainability initiatives enhances their operations and prospects for success and therefore our own. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 80% of our 299 new property investments in 2022 were leased subject to our Green Lease.

6

Sustainability Partnership. In September 2022, we entered into a partnership with Budderfly, a growing Energy-Efficiency-as-a-Service (“EEaaS”) provider in the United States. The Essential Sustainability Partnership intends to deploy significant energy infrastructure improvements aimed to improve the energy efficiency at our buildings and to deliver operating savings to our tenants through a guaranteed monthly utility usage reduction. Through the Essential Sustainability Partnership, we will invest capital in energy-efficient technologies and equipment upgrades that Budderfly will install and manage at no cost to our tenants. A 6% energy cost savings per month is passed through to the tenant. The sustainability upgrades will include, but are not limited to: the installation of LED lighting and lighting controls, higher efficiency HVAC units along with HVAC controls and monitoring, refrigeration controls and monitoring, solar solutions, and net metering and controls through Budderfly’s Facility Smart Grid System. As part of the Essential Sustainability Partnership, for each agreement our tenants enter into with Budderfly and for which we invest the capital for the energy efficiency upgrades, Budderfly will identify, apply for and obtain payments, grants, credits or similar financial incentives related to the upgrades which will contribute to the return we achieve on our investment.

Our Headquarters. In addition to assisting our tenants with their sustainability initiatives, we recognize that our Company has a direct carbon footprint at space occupied by us that we are committed to reducing. We emphasize sustainability at our corporate headquarters, lease space in a building that is certified under the EPA’s Energy Star certification program and implement sustainability measures that seek to reduce our environmental impact and carbon footprint, such as:

Corporate Culture and Employees

We seek to provide a dynamic and rewarding work environment that promotes the retention and career development of our employees and is a differentiating factor in our ability to attract new talent. We strive to offer our employees attractive and equitable compensation, regular opportunities to participate in professional development activities, outlets for civic engagement, and reasonable flexibility to allow a healthy work-life balance. Our employees further our commitment to social responsibility through their efforts to become involved in outside organizations that promote education, environmental and social well-being.

We are committed to maximizing value for our stockholders and believe it’s essential for all of our employees to be aligned in that commitment. For that reason, all of our employees participate annually in our equity incentive program. All of our employees are, or will have the opportunity to become, stockholders in EPRT.

7

We have built a diverse and inclusive culture that encourages, supports and celebrates our employees’ diverse voices and experiences. We believe a diverse employee base enhances our execution as a company, encourages innovative thinking, and increases alignment with our tenants and the community around us. The following charts highlight our workforce diversity as of December 31, 2022:

Diversity, equity and inclusion are key to executing our business plan and generating differentiated results. Women comprise 43% of our employees and hold approximately 47% of our management positions, providing significant leadership at our company, and minorities comprise approximately 23% of our employees and 18% of our management team.

We value equal opportunity in the workplace and fair employment practices. We have a talented and diverse group of employees, and we are committed to maintaining an inclusive and rewarding work environment. Among the programs and benefits that we offer employees are:

8

Our commitment to maintaining a positive work environment extends beyond offering attractive compensation and opportunities for professional development. We actively promote a dynamic and inclusive work environment by:

9

GOVERNANCE

Board Recommendation

The Board unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each of the nominees named above.

Board Refreshment and Key Board Characteristics

Our Board is committed to periodic board refreshment, which we believe promotes effective board structure and composition. We seek to add directors who contribute to diversity of background, expertise, perspective, age, gender and ethnicity.

Since January 2020, we have elected each of Lawrence J. Minich, Heather L. Neary and Janaki Sivanesan to our Board. These new directors add expertise, perspective, and age and gender diversity. With the addition of these new members, our Board has the following key characteristics:

Diverse: 38% of our Board is female.

Independent: Seven of our eight directors (i.e., all of our directors other than our Chief Executive Officer), or 88%, are independent.

Refreshed: Three directors were elected as recently as January 2020.

Young: 75% of our directors are in their 50s or younger.

Biographical Information Regarding the Board

Set forth below is biographical information for each director nominee, each of whom currently serves as a director of the Company.

Paul T. Bossidy. Mr. Bossidy has served as the chairman of our Board since 2018. Mr. Bossidy is President and Chief Executive Officer of Patripabre Capital LLC, in Ridgefield, Connecticut, and provides consulting services to companies in the financial services industry. From 2015 to 2019, Mr. Bossidy served on the board of directors of Berkshire Hills Bancorp, Inc., a bank holding company that is the parent of Berkshire Bank with branches throughout New England. Mr. Bossidy previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Clayton Holdings LLC (“Clayton”) from 2008 to 2014, when it was acquired by Radian Group, Inc. Prior to joining Clayton, Mr. Bossidy was a Senior Operations Executive at Cerberus Capital Management LP, a real estate investment fund, from 2006 to 2008. Prior to that, Mr. Bossidy served in various executive appointments for General Electric Company from 1993 to 2006, including General Manager of Corporate Business Development, President of the Refrigerator Product Line within GE Appliances Division, President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Lighting (North America), President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Vendor Financial Services, President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Commercial Equipment Financing and President and Chief Executive Officer of GE Capital Solutions Group. From 2001 to 2006, while Chief Executive Officer of GE Commercial Equipment Financing, Mr. Bossidy was also responsible for GE Franchise Finance, a lender for the franchise finance market, which operated a large triple-net lease real estate business. He is a Certified Public Accountant and a Certified Six Sigma Black Belt. Mr. Bossidy received a B.A. from Williams College, a Masters in Accounting from New York University and an M.B.A. with concentrations in Finance and Marketing from Columbia University Graduate School of Business.

Joyce DeLucca. Ms. DeLucca has served as a director since 2018. Ms. DeLucca is a Partner of BD Capital Management LLC, a private investment firm focusing on performing and distressed commercial real estate. Until December 2020, Ms. DeLucca was Managing Director at Hayfin Capital Management, LLC, a private investment firm focusing on direct lending, special opportunities, high yield credit and securitized credit.

11

Ms. DeLucca joined Hayfin in January 2018, when Hayfin acquired Kingsland Capital Management LLC. Kingsland was an investment manager specializing in collateralized loan obligations and leveraged credit that was founded by Ms. DeLucca in January 2005, and where she served as Managing Principal and Chief Investment Officer. Ms. DeLucca’s career spans 32 years in the debt capital markets, including management of high yield, leveraged loan, distressed and mezzanine assets. Prior to establishing Kingsland, Ms. DeLucca was a Managing Principal at Katonah Capital, an asset manager focusing on leveraged loans and high yield bonds, from 2000 to 2004. Previously, Ms. DeLucca was a Managing Director at Chase Manhattan Bank, where she co-founded Octagon Credit Investors, from 1995 until 1999. Ms. DeLucca was also a Portfolio Manager and Investment Advisor at Fisher Brothers from 1989 to 1995, where she focused on distressed and high yield investing. She began her career as a trader and analyst with Bernstein Macaulay’s high yield bond and mortgage-backed securities divisions, where she was employed from 1986 to 1989. Ms. DeLucca served on the Regulatory and Board Nominating Committees of the Loan Sales and Trading Association from 2006 to 2010. She received a B.S. in Finance from Ithaca College in 1986 and is a CFA charterholder.

Scott A. Estes. Mr. Estes has served as a director since 2018. Mr. Estes served as Executive Vice President-Chief Financial Officer of Welltower Inc. (“Welltower”), a NYSE-listed, S&P 500 constituent REIT focused on healthcare infrastructure, from January 2009 to October 2017. Mr. Estes served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Welltower from March 2006 to January 2009 and as Vice President of Finance of Welltower from April 2003 to March 2006. From January 2000 to April 2003, Mr. Estes served as a Senior Equity Research Analyst and Vice President with Deutsche Bank Securities, a financial services firm, with primary coverage of the Healthcare REIT and Healthcare Services industry sub-sectors. Previously, Mr. Estes served as a Vice President of Bank of America Securities from January 1998 through December 1999 and as an Associate Analyst and Vice President at Morgan Stanley from March 1994 through December 1997. Mr. Estes is a member of the board of trustees of JBG Smith Properties, a NYSE-listed REIT that owns, operates, invests in and develops a mixed-use portfolio of office, multifamily and retail assets concentrated in leading urban infill submarkets in and around Washington, DC, where he serves as the chairman of the Audit Committee. Since August 2022, Mr. Estes has served on the board of directors of American Healthcare REIT, Inc., a non-traded, public real estate investment trust that owns and manages a portfolio of healthcare real estate assets, where he serves as a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Estes received his B.A. in Economics in 1993 from The College of William and Mary.

Peter M. Mavoides. Mr. Mavoides has been our President and Chief Executive Officer since 2018, and he held similar positions since March 2016 at Essential Properties Realty Trust LLC (“EPRT LLC”), which became our operating partnership in connection with our June 2018 initial public offering. From September 2011 through February 2015, Mr. Mavoides was the President and Chief Operating Officer of Spirit Realty Capital, Inc. (“Spirit”), an NYSE-listed REIT that invests primarily in single-tenant, net leased real estate. While at Spirit, Mr. Mavoides was instrumental in transforming that company from a private enterprise, with approximately $3.2 billion of total assets and 37 employees at the time of its September 2012 initial public offering, to a public company with approximately $8.0 billion of total assets and over 70 employees at the time of his departure in February 2015. During his tenure at Spirit, Mr. Mavoides chaired the company’s investment committee and led the team that created the infrastructure that acquired over 150 separate investments with an aggregate purchase price of nearly $2.0 billion and an average investment per property of $2.6 million over a period of approximately three years. Mr. Mavoides previously worked for Sovereign, as its President and Chief Executive Officer, from May 2003 to January 2011. Sovereign is a private equity firm that focuses on investment opportunities relating to long-term, net-leased real estate. While at Sovereign, Mr. Mavoides developed and implemented a business plan pursuant to which Sovereign grew from a startup to a leading investor focused on single-tenant, net leased properties, and he implemented an investment strategy pursuant to which over $1.0 billion was invested in net lease transactions. During his tenure at Spirit and Sovereign, Mr. Mavoides was instrumental in structuring the investment of approximately $4.0 billion in net lease assets. Prior to joining Sovereign, Mr. Mavoides was employed by Eastdil Realty, a subsidiary of Wells Fargo Bank, and worked in the banking group at Citigroup, where he focused on the structuring of sale-leaseback transactions. Mr. Mavoides received a B.S. from the United States Military Academy and an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan.

12

Lawrence J. Minich. Mr. Minich has served as a director since 2020. Mr. Minich retired in 2019 as an executive officer of Hotshine Holdings, Inc. (d/b/a Mister Car Wash), a private equity-backed company that went public on the NYSE in June 2021. Mister Car Wash is one of the largest car wash operators in the United States. Mr. Minich served as the company’s Chief Financial Officer from 1999-2013, at which time he relinquished that position as part of the company’s management succession plan, and from 2014-2019 he served as a Vice President of and Special Advisor to Mister Car Wash. During that later period, Mr. Minich continued to work with the company’s acquisition team in evaluating and negotiating acquisitions, including the sourcing and negotiation of sale-leaseback transactions. He also served on the company’s investment committee and as an advisor to senior management on strategic, operational and administrative matters. Prior to his affiliation with Mister Car Wash, Mr. Minich worked as a financial consultant from 1997-1999 and served as Senior Vice President & Treasurer of Blue Coral, Inc., a privately held manufacturing company in the automotive aftermarket, from 1981-1996, when the company was sold to Quaker State Oil. Earlier in his career, from 1970-1981, Mr. Minich worked in the audit department of Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Minich received his B.S. in Accounting from the University of Akron in 1970 and his CPA certificate in 1972.

Heather L. Neary. Ms. Neary has served as a director since 2020. Ms. Neary has served as Brand President/KBP Bells for KBP Brands, a large franchisor of Taco Bell, KFC and Arby’s operating properties, since March 2021. From November 2015 through January 2021, Ms. Neary was the President of Auntie Anne’s, a leading soft pretzel franchisor, with more than 1,800 locations in 48 states and over 25 countries. Ms. Neary joined Auntie Anne’s in 2005 and held positions of increasing responsibility, including Vice President, Global Marketing immediately prior to her promotion to President in 2015. During her tenure at Auntie Anne’s, Ms. Neary was responsible for various functions, including overseeing marketing, communications, operations, research and development, product innovation and the franchisee leadership team. Prior to joining Auntie Anne’s, Ms. Neary held roles in marketing and as a managing editor for a business magazine. In addition to her commercial activities, Ms. Neary serves on the Board of Directors for the National Restaurant Association and on the Board of Directors for Women’s Foodservice Forum. She also serves on the Board of Advisors for Penn State Harrisburg and the Advisory Board for Alex’s Lemonade Stand Foundation. Ms. Neary received a B.A. from Millersville University in 1999 and an M.B.A. from Penn State University in 2009.

Stephen D. Sautel. Mr. Sautel has served as a director since 2018. Mr. Sautel is a private investor, and he serves on the board of several companies engaged in diverse businesses. Since 2021, Mr. Sautel has served as a director of Horizon Acquisition Corporation II, a special-purpose acquisition company, and from 2017 to 2022, Mr. Sautel served as a director of CBAM Holdings, LLC, a manager of below investment grade corporate credit that was sold to affiliates of the Carlyle Group, Inc. From 2014 to 2018, Mr. Sautel served as a director of Guggenheim Partners Investment Management Holdings, LLC, a diversified institutional investment management firm. From October 2001 to June 2014, Mr. Sautel was an investment professional at Guggenheim Capital, LLC, where he held the titles of Senior Managing Director and Chief Operating Officer of the Investments Business. While at Guggenheim, Mr. Sautel co-founded the firm’s credit investing business and later was responsible for supervising the firm’s investment management operations. Prior to Guggenheim, Mr. Sautel worked at J.H. Whitney & Co., First Chicago Capital Markets, and Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Sautel received a B.B.A. from the University of Kentucky in 1991 and an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan in 1996. Mr. Sautel is a CFA charterholder.

Janaki Sivanesan. Ms. Sivanesan has served as a director since 2020. Ms. Sivanesan is a practicing attorney and private investor in early stage and middle market companies. She was also a founding principal of a private equity firm focused on middle market investments. Ms. Sivanesan has over 20 years of legal experience, including practicing as a partner at large international firms. As an independent sponsor-principal and as a legal advisor, Ms. Sivanesan has participated in a wide range of transactions, including mergers and acquisitions, complex corporate financings and restructurings. Ms. Sivanesan has structured and negotiated private equity and debt investments in a range of industries, including technology, healthcare, oil and gas, and real estate development. Ms. Sivanesan also has experience in cross-border transactions related to manufacturing and outsourcing, and is knowledgeable with respect to business operations in India. Ms. Sivanesan has been a

13

member of the Board of Directors of Hurco Companies, Inc. (Nasdaq Global Select Market: HURC), an international industrial technology company, since 2008. Ms. Sivanesan received her Bachelors of Arts in Business Administration, finance, magna cum laude, from Kennesaw State University in 1991 and her Juris Doctor, cum laude, from Case Western Reserve University School of Law in 1995.

Background and Experience of Directors

When considering whether directors have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of our business and structure, the Board focused primarily on each person’s background and experience as reflected in the information disclosed in each of the directors’ individual biographies set forth above. The Board believes that the director nominees provide an appropriate mix of experience, qualifications, attributes and skills relevant to our business. In particular, the Board considered the following important characteristics, among others, with respect to each director:

Board Leadership Structure

Our Board currently consists of eight members, each of whom is currently serving for a term expiring at the Annual Meeting and upon the election and qualification of his or her successor.

The Board has no fixed policy with respect to the separation of the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. The Board retains the discretion to determine, at any time, whether to combine or separate the positions as it deems to be in the best interests of the Company. However, the Board currently believes that separating the positions of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman is an integral part of effective corporate governance, because it improves the ability of the Board to exercise its oversight role by having a director who is not a member of management serve as the Chairman of the Board.

Board Executive Sessions

The non-employee members of the Board meet in executive session without management present at the conclusion of each regular Board meeting. Mr. Bossidy, the Chairman of our Board, acts as the Chair at all of these executive sessions.

14

Board of Directors Role in Risk Oversight

One of the key functions of our Board is informed oversight of our risk management process. Our Board administers this oversight function directly, with support from its four standing committees, the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Investment Committee, each of which oversees our management of risks specific to its respective areas of oversight. In particular, as more fully described below, our Audit Committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss our major financial risk exposures and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. The Audit Committee also monitors compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, in addition to oversight of the performance of our internal audit function. Our Compensation Committee assesses and monitors whether any of our compensation policies and programs have the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking. See “Executive Compensation—Compensation Risk Assessment.” Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee provides oversight with respect to corporate governance and ethical conduct and monitors the effectiveness of our corporate governance guidelines. As part of its oversight of our governance and related policies and procedures, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also monitors enterprise-level and ESG specific risk. Our Investment Committee reviews and approves certain of our proposed investments.

Meetings and Attendance

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Board met nine times. No director attended fewer than 75% of the total number of Board meetings and committee meetings on which he or she served that were held during the year ended December 31, 2022 and that were held while such person was a director of the Company or member of such committee. The Board has four standing committees: the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and the Investment Committee. The charters for each of these committees are available on our investor relations website at http://investors.essentialproperties.com. The Board may establish other committees as it deems necessary or appropriate from time to time. We do not have a formal policy regarding attendance by members of the Board at annual meetings of stockholders. Messrs. Estes, Mavoides and Minich attended our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders.

Board Committees

Audit Committee

Our Board has adopted an Audit Committee charter, which defines the Audit Committee’s principal functions, including oversight related to:

The Audit Committee is also responsible for engaging, evaluating, compensating and overseeing an independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans for and results of the audit engagement, approving services that may be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, including audit and non-audit services, reviewing the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee also prepares the audit committee report required by SEC regulations to be included in our annual report or proxy statement.

15

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Audit Committee met five times. The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Estes and Minich and Ms. Sivanesan. Our Board has determined that (i) each of Mr. Estes, Mr. Minich and Ms. Sivanesan qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term has been defined by the SEC in Item 407(d)(5) of Regulation S-K, and (ii) each member of our Audit Committee is “financially literate” as that term is defined by NYSE listing standards and meets the definition for “independence” for the purposes of serving on our Audit Committee under NYSE listing standards and Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

Compensation Committee

Our Board has adopted a Compensation Committee charter, which defines the Compensation Committee’s principal functions to include:

The Compensation Committee has the authority, in its sole discretion, to retain or obtain the advice of a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser as it deems appropriate. The committee may form and delegate authority to subcommittees consisting of one or more members when it deems appropriate.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Compensation Committee met four times. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Mr. Bossidy and Mses. DeLucca and Neary. Our Board has determined affirmatively that each member of our Compensation Committee meets the definition for “independence” for the purpose of serving on our Compensation Committee under applicable rules of the NYSE, and each member of our Compensation Committee meets the definition of a “non-employee director” for the purpose of serving on our Compensation Committee under Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our Board has adopted a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee charter, which defines the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s principal functions, to include:

In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors our overall risk management process at an enterprise level, and during 2022 evaluated various risks and the processes in place to monitor and mitigate such risks, including portfolio risks, operational risks, balance sheet risks and human capital risks.

16

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times. Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is composed of Messrs. Minich and Sautel, and Mses. Neary and Sivanesan, with Mr. Sautel serving as chair. Our Board has determined affirmatively that each member of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the definition of independence under NYSE listing standards.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers candidates for director suggested by its members, as well as by management and our stockholders, if such candidates meet the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s criteria for Board membership, evaluating them in the same manner in which the committee evaluates other candidates. Such recommendations should be made in writing to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee or the Corporate Secretary of the Company and should include a description of the qualifications of the proposed candidate.

A stockholder who desires to suggest a prospective nominee for the Board should notify the Corporate Secretary of the Company, at 902 Carnegie Center Boulevard, Suite 520, Princeton, New Jersey 08540. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has the authority and right to retain a search firm to identify or evaluate potential nominees if it so desires.

In evaluating candidates to serve on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s objective is to select individuals with experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that can assist the Company and the Board in achieving their objectives. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers (i) individual qualifications, including relevant career experience, strength of character, maturity of judgment, experience in, and familiarity with, the Company’s business and industry and (ii) all other factors it considers appropriate, which may include age, diversity of background, existing commitments to other businesses, potential conflicts of interest, legal considerations, corporate governance background (including experience as a board member or officer of another publicly held company), financial and accounting background, executive compensation background and the size, composition and combined expertise of the existing Board. Though neither the Board nor the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has a formal policy concerning diversity, the Board values diversity, believes diversity should be considered in the director identification and nominating process, and seeks director nominees that have a diverse range of views, backgrounds and leadership, as well as business experience. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considers the extent to which the candidate would fill a present need on the Board.

Once the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has identified a prospective nominee, the committee will make an initial determination as to whether to conduct a full evaluation of the candidate. This initial determination will be based on the information provided to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee with the recommendation of the prospective candidate, as well as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s own knowledge of the prospective candidate, which may be supplemented by inquiries to the person making the recommendation or others.

As set forth in the Company’s current bylaws, the deadline for providing notice of stockholder nominations, which must contain the information required by the Company’s bylaws, is not less than 120 calendar days nor more than 150 calendar days prior to the first anniversary of the date the Company’s Proxy Statement was released to stockholders in connection with the previous year’s annual meeting. In addition to satisfying the notice requirements under our bylaws, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than management’s nominees must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act, including providing a statement that such stockholder intends to solicit the holders of shares representing at least 67% of the voting power of the Company’s shares entitled to vote on the election of directors in support of director nominees other than management’s nominees at least 60 days before the anniversary of the prior year’s annual meeting. Please see “Other Matters – Stockholder Proposals for the 2024 Annual Meeting.”

17

Investment Committee

The Board has also implemented an Investment Committee, comprised of three of our independent directors, to review and approve certain of our proposed investments that fall outside of management’s standard approval authority based on the size of the total investment or the type of investment, among other things. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Investment Committee met three times. Our Investment Committee is composed of Mses. DeLucca and Sivanesan and Mr. Minich.

Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines and a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all of our officers, directors and employees. The current versions of these and other corporate governance documents are available free of charge on the Company’s website (http://www.essentialproperties.com) in the investor relations section under Governance Documents and in print to any stockholder who requests copies by contacting the Company at 902 Carnegie Center Boulevard, Suite 520, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Anti-Hedging, Anti-Pledging and Anti-Short Sale Policies

The Board considers it inappropriate for any director, officer or employee of the Company to enter into transactions that allow such a holder to own securities issued by the Company (or securities exercisable, convertible into or exchangeable therefor) without the full risks and rewards of ownership, as this potentially separates the holder’s economic interests from those of other security holders. Therefore, the Company prohibits the purchase or sale of puts, calls, options or other derivative securities based on the Company’s securities by directors, officers or employees of the Company. Hedging or monetization transactions, such as forward sale contracts, in which the stockholder continues to own the underlying security without all the risks or rewards of ownership are also prohibited by such persons. Further, members of our Board and executive officers are prohibited from pledging or otherwise encumbering Company securities as collateral for indebtedness. Additionally, our directors, officers and employees are prohibited from engaging in short sales of our common stock.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

With respect to 2022, each of our non-employee directors received, as compensation for services as a director, an annual award of $100,000 (increased from $60,000 in 2021) of RSUs and an annual cash retainer of $60,000 (increased from $40,000 in 2021). The equity awards granted to our non-employee directors were made pursuant to our 2018 Incentive Plan and are scheduled to vest on the earlier to occur of (i) the first anniversary of the date of grant and (ii) the first annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders that occurs after the date of grant, subject to the director’s continued service on our Board. Our Chairman received an additional annual cash retainer of $120,000 (increased from $100,000 in 2021). Directors who served on our Audit Committee, other than the chair of the committee, received an additional annual cash retainer of $12,500 (increased from $10,000 in 2021), and directors who served on each of our Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, other than the chairs of such committees, received an additional annual cash retainer of $7,500 (increased from $5,000 in 2021). The director who served as chair of the Audit Committee received an additional annual cash retainer of $25,000 (increased from $20,000 in 2021), and the directors who served as chairs of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee each received an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 (increased from $10,000 in 2021). In addition, in 2022, the Board eliminated the Board fee for attendance at Board meetings in excess of seven per year. The Board determined the adjustment to the non-employee director compensation program after considering the increased complexity and responsibilities of the Board in light of the Company’s meaningful growth and to maintain competitive positioning among peers.

Directors receive pro-rated amounts of the annual cash retainer and annual RSU award for the portion of the first year in which they are appointed or elected to serve as a Board member or committee chair.

Director Independence

After reviewing all relevant relationships and considering the NYSE requirements for independence, the Board has determined that each of Messrs. Bossidy, Estes, Minich and Sautel, and Mses. DeLucca, Neary and Sivanesan is an “independent director” as such term is defined by the applicable rules and regulations of the NYSE.

as Consolidated-Tomoka Land Co., a publicly traded, diversified real estate operating company, since April 16, 2012. Since November 26, 2019, Mr. Patten was also Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc., a publicly traded REIT that invests in single-tenant net lease retail properties throughout the United States. In connection with his election as our Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Patten resigned from his positions with CTO Realty Growth, Inc. and Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc., effective as of July 31, 2021. Mr. Patten’s prior experience includes his tenure, from January 2004 until the sale of the company in April 2007, as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of CNL Hotels & Resorts, Inc., a public, non-traded lodging REIT with approximately $7.7 billion in total assets. Mr. Patten began his career at KPMG in September 1986, and he was elected into the partnership in July 1997. Mr. Patten’s experience involves various aspects of finance, capital markets, accounting, real estate development and operations, financial and SEC reporting, treasury management and risk management. Mr. Patten graduated from the University of Florida with a B.S. in Accounting.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In this section, we describe the material components of our executive compensation program for our NEOs, whose compensation is set forth in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table and other compensation tables contained in this Proxy Statement. We also provide an overview of our executive compensation philosophy and the factors that we consider relevant to the analysis of our executive compensation program. Our NEOs during 2022 were:

Business Highlights

Our Business. We are an internally managed real estate company that acquires, owns and manages primarily single-tenant properties that are net leased on a long-term basis to middle-market companies operating service- oriented or experience-based businesses. We have a diversified portfolio that is comprised of properties leased to tenants in 16 distinct industries, including businesses such as early childhood education, restaurants (primarily quick service restaurants), medical and dental services, car washes, automotive services, convenience stores and equipment rental and sales.

Highlights of 2022 included the following:

21

most directly comparable financial measures calculated in accordance with GAAP.

22

2022 Total Stockholder Return. Our strategic objective is to create value for our stockholders over the long term by delivering strong operational performance, which we believe will result in appreciable total stockholder return (“TSR”), which considers both the change in the price per share of our common stock on the NYSE and the dividends paid per share of common stock during the relevant period. The following charts illustrate our TSR during 2022 and since our initial public offering in June 2018 through December 31, 2022, relative to the 2022 Compensation Peer Group (as defined below). As presented in the second chart below, from our initial public offering in June 2018 through December 31, 2022, we have the highest TSR relative to the 2022 Compensation Peer Group.

23

24

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

Our executive compensation philosophy is designed to promote a pay-for-performance culture where our NEOs performance must contribute to the achievement of measurable financial performance goals of the Company in order to receive their incentive cash compensation and also must deliver meaningful returns or value for our stockholders relative to our peers in order to be awarded equity incentive compensation. Each element of our compensation program (discussed in more detail below) is meant to work toward accomplishing the following objectives:

How We Determine Compensation

Role of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, operating pursuant to authority delegated to it by the Board, oversees the design, development and implementation of our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee also administers our compensation plans and awards for the Company’s directors and NEOs and is primarily responsible for reviewing and approving our compensation policies and the compensation paid to our NEOs. The Compensation Committee’s responsibilities are set forth in its written charter.

Role of Management. Our President and Chief Executive Officer works closely with the Compensation Committee and its independent compensation consultant to analyze relevant peer data and to provide input into the compensation program design. Management assists the Compensation Committee’s independent compensation consultant in its review of executive compensation by providing historical compensation information. Management makes recommendations for the program design for the NEOs for consideration by the Compensation Committee.

Role of Independent Compensation Consultant. In 2022, the Compensation Committee engaged Ferguson Partners Consulting L.P. (“FPC”) as its independent compensation consultant to assist the Compensation Committee with the design of our executive compensation program. FPC provided the Compensation Committee with market data and made recommendations regarding the compensation mix and levels with respect to the 2022 executive compensation program described herein. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of FPC pursuant to the NYSE rules and the Company concluded that the work performed by FPC did not raise any conflict of interest.

Competitive Market Analysis. In developing our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee, with the assistance of FPC and management, gathers and reviews the compensation practices, salary levels and target incentive levels of a group of other publicly traded REITs considered by the Compensation Committee to be comparable to the Company in terms of size, business model and geography. Periodically, as part of its review of executive compensation, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with FPC, reviews peer group composition and assesses whether any adjustments are appropriate. As described below, the Compensation Committee, with input from FPC, made an adjustment to remove two companies from and add two companies to the peer group used for consideration in determining 2022 compensation.

25

Using the below methodology, the Compensation Committee, with input from FPC, approved the peer group for use in informing 2022 compensation decisions. In developing the 2022 Compensation Peer Group, the Compensation Committee considered various factors, including:

The companies selected for the 2022 Compensation Peer Group, per the methodology described above, are best suited to provide a meaningful review of current market practices. Changes to the peer group more accurately reflect our size, operational activity and geography. Changes to the 2022 Compensation Peer Group, as compared to the prior compensation peer group, are shown below.

The 2022 Peer Group consisted of the following 14 public REITs (the “2022 Compensation Peer Group”):

Source: S&P Global, data as of December 31, 2022.

Note: When applicable, units in an operating partnership, representing non-controlling interests, are included in Market Capitalization and Total Capitalization (as applicable).

The 2022 Compensation Peer Group was used by the Compensation Committee to evaluate pay level and overall compensation design, and was generally driven by both the size of the peer company and the similarity of its business model relative to us. We use a different peer group to evaluate TSR, which, as described more fully

26

herein, is an element used in evaluating certain aspects of our performance-based compensation and includes companies that we believe are more similar to us in terms of business operations and industry focus and an appropriate measure of our relative performance. The peer group used in 2022 for evaluating TSR includes the following companies: Agree Realty Corporation, EPR Properties, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc., Getty Realty Corp., National Retail Properties, Inc., Realty Income Corporation, Seritage Growth Properties, Spirit Realty Capital, Inc., STAG Industrial, Inc., and STORE Capital Corporation (the “2022 TSR Peer Group”). The 2022 TSR Peer Group is the same peer group that was used to evaluate TSR performance in 2021.

With the assistance of FPC, the Compensation Committee reviewed the 2022 compensation of our NEOs. The review included an evaluation of the Company’s compensation practices, both in terms of pay level and compensation design, relative to those of the 2022 Compensation Peer Group. The Compensation Committee considered base salaries, short-term incentive compensation and long-term equity compensation, as well as the Company’s performance on an absolute and relative basis. The review was intended to provide the Compensation Committee with insight into market pay levels and practices in an effort to design an appropriately competitive compensation program. The Compensation Committee does not target compensation at a specific percentile of peer group data. Rather, the Compensation Committee seeks to develop an overall compensation program that is informed by peer group data, as well as other factors that the committee, in its collective judgment, believes to be relevant. Factors that the Compensation Committee considers include an executive’s experience and performance and internal pay equity among the Company’s senior management team (considering each executive’s respective scope of responsibilities and specific skills, and ability to impact business results) and other business events or conditions.

Consideration of Prior Say-on-Pay Results. In its compensation review process, the Compensation Committee considers whether the Company’s executive compensation program is aligned with the interests of the Company’s stockholders. As part of its review of the Company’s executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee considered the approval by approximately 97% of the votes cast for the Company’s say-on-pay vote at our 2022 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The Compensation Committee determined that the Company’s executive compensation philosophies and objectives and compensation elements continued to be appropriate and did not make any changes to the Company’s executive compensation program in response to the 2022 say-on-pay vote.

27

28

The following chart presents the overall target mix of compensation elements for the CEO and all other NEOs as a group for 2022:

88% of the overall target mix for our CEO is performance-based/at risk and 77% of the overall target mix for our other NEOs is performance-based/at risk.

Set forth below is a discussion of each of the main components of 2022 compensation for our NEOs.

In designing and implementing base salary, short-term incentives and long-term incentives, the Compensation Committee considered, among other things, information provided by FPC to assist it in analyzing the compensation practices of the 2022 Compensation Peer Group and creating an overall compensation program that is designed to be competitive and to appropriately incentivize our NEOs.

Base Salary. Base salary represents a minimum level of cash compensation to our NEOs. Our goal in setting base salary amounts is to provide competitive compensation that reflects the contributions and skill levels of each executive. Based on a review of the market data provided by FPC, and in consideration of strong Company and individual performance, it was determined that an increase to our CFO’s and COO’s base salary was appropriate and warranted to maintain competitiveness with the 2022 Compensation Peer Group and to retain and incentivize our CFO and COO.

Short-Term Incentives. Payment opportunities for cash awards under the annual cash bonus program are expressed as a percentage of base salary and are designed to reflect each individual’s contributions to the Company and the market level of compensation for such position. We have designed our annual cash bonus program to motivate the Company’s executive officers to achieve performance goals established by the Compensation Committee that reinforce our annual business plan, to assist the Company in attracting and retaining qualified executives and to promote the alignment of the NEOs’ interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. The following tables show the key components of our short-term incentive plan during 2022, with 75% of our short-term incentive program determined based on pre-established performance goals and the

29

remaining 25% determined based on the Compensation Committee’s qualitative assessment of an executive’s performance.

For 2022, the Compensation Committee approved the following threshold, target and maximum cash bonus award opportunities, expressed as a percentage of base salary, for each NEO:

As illustrated in the chart below, Messrs. Mavoides Patten, and Seibert’s annual cash bonuses are weighted 75% based on corporate performance metrics and 25% on a qualitative assessment of individual performance.

30

Corporate Metrics, Weightings and Results. For 2022, the Compensation Committee identified the following performance criteria (and assigned the associated weightings out of the total) to evaluate corporate performance:

2022 Corporate Metric performance levels and results are shown below:

Corporate Performance Metric #1: AFFO Per Share⁽¹⁾

Why is this metric important? We believe Adjusted FFO, which is derived from Core FFO and FFO as described below, is an appropriate supplemental measure of our operating performance and a measure that is used by many investors to evaluate our performance. Funds from operations (“FFO”) may facilitate meaningful comparisons of operating performance between periods and among our peers, primarily because it excludes the effect of real estate depreciation and amortization (which are dependent on historical costs and implicitly assume that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time, rather than fluctuating based on existing market conditions) and net gains and losses on sales. In addition, FFO is a measure commonly used in the Company’s industry and we believe that this measure is useful to investors and analysts, because it provides important supplemental information concerning the Company’s operating performance. We calculate FFO, Core FFO and Adjusted FFO as described below.

We compute FFO in accordance with the definition adopted by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”). NAREIT defines FFO as GAAP net income or loss adjusted to exclude extraordinary items (as defined by GAAP), net gain or loss from sales of depreciable real estate assets, impairment write-downs associated with depreciable real estate assets and real estate-related depreciation and amortization (excluding amortization of deferred financing costs and depreciation of non-real estate assets), including the pro rata share of such adjustments of unconsolidated subsidiaries.

We compute Core FFO by adjusting FFO, as defined by NAREIT, to exclude certain GAAP income and expense amounts that we believe are infrequent and unusual in nature and/or not related to our core real estate operations. Items included in calculating FFO that may be excluded in calculating Core FFO include certain transaction-related gains, losses, income or expense or other non-core amounts as they occur.

We compute Adjusted FFO by modifying Core FFO to include other adjustments to GAAP net income related to certain items that we believe are not indicative of operating performance, including straight-line rental revenue, non-cash interest expense, non-cash compensation expense, other amortization and non-cash charges, capitalized interest expense and transaction costs.

Performance: In 2022, we achieved $1.53 in AFFO per share, resulting in achievement at the High hurdle.

31

Corporate Performance Metric #2: Net Investments

Why is this metric important? Net investments is the primary metric by which the Company tracks how much it is investing in growing its portfolio, and therefore how well it is advancing its external growth strategy. The Threshold, Target and High levels are determined based on annual forecasts of net investment activity and are not explicitly tied to prior year results.

Net investments is calculated as the purchase price of investments made less the sales price of properties sold and less any notes receivable principal repayments during the year ended December 31, 2022.

Performance: In 2022, we achieved $781.8 million in net investments, resulting in achievement between the Target hurdle and the High hurdle.

Corporate Performance Metric #3: Recurring Cash G&A Expense⁽¹⁾

Why is this metric important? The Company believes it is appropriate to consider the cash spent on its overhead costs, as this affects the overall cash flow generated by the Company and efficient spending generally is correlated with increasing stockholder value, while recognizing the strategic need for additional cash G&A expense on an absolute year-over-year basis as the Company grows.

The Company calculates its cash general and administrative expense (“G&A”) as total recognized G&A less certain non-recurring expenses and non-cash expenses, primarily compensation expense (see Annex A).

Performance: In 2022, our cash G&A expense was $20.0 million, resulting in achievement above the High hurdle.

Corporate Performance Metric #4: Same Store Rent Growth

Why is this metric important? The Company believes it is appropriate to consider changes in same-store contractual cash rent for the quarter ended December 31, 2022 relative to the quarter ended December 31, 2021 when evaluating its portfolio, as it reflects aspects of our asset management efforts, such as leasing, releasing and dispositions, as well as changes in cash rent due to contractual rent escalation provisions contained in our leases. The same-store portfolio includes all properties owned or serving as collateral for our loans, excluding properties under construction, for the period September 30, 2021 through December 31, 2022. Contractual cash rent refers to the amount of cash rent and interest our tenants/borrowers are contractually obligated to pay pursuant to our leases or mortgage loans (excludes percentage rent and redevelopment properties currently not generating revenue).

Performance: In 2022, we achieved 1.58% in Same Store Rent Growth, resulting in achievement between the Target hurdle and the High hurdle.

32

Corporate Performance Metric #5: Net Debt-to-Annualized Adjusted EBITDAre Ratio⁽¹⁾

Why is this metric important? The Company’s Net Debt-to-Annualized Adjusted EBTIDAre Ratio is a meaningful metric of the Company’s leverage and indicative of whether its balance sheet is positioned to fund external growth opportunities while maintaining a conservative long-term leverage profile. The Threshold, Target and High levels are determined based on annual forecasts and are not explicitly tied to prior year results.

The Company calculates its net debt as its gross debt (defined as total debt plus net deferred financing costs and original issue discount on its borrowings) less cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash deposits available for future investment. The Company believes excluding cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash deposits available for future investment from gross debt, all of which could be used to repay debt, provides an estimate of the net contractual amount of borrowed capital to be repaid, which it believes is a beneficial disclosure to investors and analysts.

The Company calculates EBITDA as earnings before interest, income taxes and depreciation and amortization. The Company computes EBITDAre in accordance with the definition adopted by NAREIT. NAREIT defines EBITDAre as EBITDA (as defined above) excluding gains (or losses) from the sales of depreciable property and real estate impairment losses. The Company presents EBITDA and EBITDAre because they are measures commonly used in its industry and the Company believes that these measures are useful to investors and analysts because they provide important supplemental information concerning the Company’s operating performance, exclusive of certain non-cash items and other costs. The Company uses EBITDA and EBITDAre as measures of its operating performance and not as measures of liquidity.

Performance: As of December 31, 2022, we achieved a Net Debt-to-Annualized Adjusted EBITDAre Ratio of 4.6x, resulting in achievement above the High hurdle.

Corporate Performance Metric #6: ESG

Why is this metric important? The Company believes that sustainability, a positive corporate culture that acknowledges the importance of its stockholders, tenants, employees, business associates and good corporate citizenship, and effective corporate governance are critical to its ability to create long-term value for its stockholders. The Company acknowledges that investors, including its stockholders, are increasingly focused on ESG matters in making investment decisions. The Compensation Committee believes that it is appropriate to consider ESG matters when establishing goals for the Company’s NEOs and in making certain compensation decisions. To this end, the Compensation Committee engaged in a qualitative evaluation of the Company’s ESG initiatives during 2022.

The Compensation Committee considered various matters, including those disclosed under “Corporate Responsibility” above and, in particular:

33

Performance: Through a qualitative assessment, the Compensation Committee determined that we achieved an ESG score of 5, resulting in an achievement at the High hurdle.

Individual Metrics, Weightings and Results. For 2022, the Compensation Committee considered both qualitative and quantitative criteria, including investor engagement, employee management, investment quality, capital markets activity, asset management, and compliance and reporting performance when determining each NEO’s overall individual performance.

Progress made on the individual metrics include the following:

2022 Payouts. For 2022, each NEO earned a cash bonus based on the weighted achievement of the corporate and individual performance metrics. The table below shows the actual payouts for each NEO under the annual cash bonus program for 2022 (dollar amounts in thousands):

Long-Term Incentives. The Compensation Committee makes awards of time-based and performance-based RSUs to officers, directors and key employees of the Company, including our NEOs. We expect to continue to make equity grants to our NEOs as part of our annual compensation program to align their long-term interests with those of our stockholders and to maintain the competitiveness of our total compensation package.

With respect to 2022, we granted time-based RSUs and performance-based RSUs to our NEOs. These awards are designed to:

34

In determining the dollar-denominated value of the 2022 time-based RSU and performance-based RSU grants, the Compensation Committee analyzed:

In 2022, the Compensation Committee approved the following notional equity grant values (dollar amounts in thousands):

In review of the market data provided by FPC, and in consideration of Company and individual performance, it was determined that an increase to our CEO’s and CFO’s total equity award ($3,200,000 and $350,000, respectively, in 2021) was appropriate and warranted to maintain competitiveness with the 2022 Compensation Peer Group and to motivate, retain, and incentivize our CEO and CFO. Further, we believe providing an increase to our CEO’s and CFO’s compensation in the form of equity (60% of which is performance-based) best aligns our CEO and CFO with stockholders and exemplifies our pay-for-performance philosophy.

Time-based RSUs vest ratably in annual increments over a four-year period, subject to the continued employment of the NEO.

Performance-based RSUs are eligible for vesting at the end of the three-year performance period ending December 31, 2024. 75% of the performance-based RSUs can vest based on the compounded TSR over the performance period of the Company relative to the 2022 TSR Peer Group described above and 25% of the RSUs can vest based on the Compensation Committee’s subjective evaluation of the achievement of strategic objectives deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee during the performance period.

If earned, shares of common stock representing 50% of the earned amount of performance-based RSUs will vest on December 31, 2024 and the remaining 50% will vest on December 31, 2025, subject to the NEO’s continued employment. For purposes of this calculation, TSR is calculated as the compounded annual growth rate, expressed as a percentage, in the value per share of common stock during the performance period due to the appreciation in the price per share of common stock and dividends paid to a stockholder with respect to one share of common stock during the performance period, assuming dividends are reinvested on the ex-dividend date (“Compounded Annual TSR”). For purposes of this calculation, the beginning and ending share price of our common stock and those of the 2022 TSR Peer Group constituents are based on a 20-day trailing average closing stock price.

Holders of time-based RSUs are entitled to dividends when paid by the Company. Holders of performance-based RSUs are not entitled to dividends paid on the underlying common stock. Instead, the number of shares of common stock underlying any performance-based RSU will be increased by an amount equal to (a) the product

35

of the total number of shares subject to such RSU immediately prior to any dividend date multiplied by the amount of any cash dividend paid per share of common stock divided by (b) the fair market value of a share of common stock on such dividend date (any such additional shares shall be subject to the same vesting conditions and payment terms as the shares to which they relate).

Performance-Based Component. With respect to the performance-based RSUs that may be earned and become vested based on the above performance criteria over the performance period, the actual number of performance-based RSUs that may be earned and become vested will be between 0% and 250% of the target amount, depending on our level of achievement of the performance criteria over the performance period. The specific targets and corresponding award levels are contained in the graphic below:

Threshold, target and maximum performance result in the NEOs earning 50%, 100% or 250% of the target number of performance-based RSUs associated with each performance level, with linear interpolation between specified levels. No performance-based RSUs under the performance-based component are earned for performance below the threshold level, and payout is capped at 250% of the target number even if performance exceeds the maximum level.

Results of 2020 Performance-Based RSU Grants

In 2020, Messrs. Mavoides and Seibert each received awards of performance-based RSUs that covered a three-year performance period that ended on December 31, 2022, with (i) 75% of the award based on our TSR relative to the TSR of a peer group specified in the 2020 performance-based RSU grant agreements and identified below (the “2020 TSR Peer Group”) over the performance period, and (ii) the remaining 25% of the award based on the Compensation Committee’s subjective evaluation of the officer’s achievement of strategic objectives deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee during the performance period (the “2020 Performance RSUs”). Mr. Mavoides was awarded 46,057 and Mr. Seibert was awarded 22,286, in each case at target, 2020 Performance RSUs. Mr. Patten did not receive any 2020 Performance RSUs as he was appointed as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on August 10, 2020.

The 2020 TSR Peer Group included the following companies: Agree Realty Corporation, EPR Properties, Four Corners Property Trust, Inc., Getty Realty Corp., National Retail Properties, Inc., Realty Income Corporation, Seritage Growth Properties, Spirit Realty Capital, Inc., STAG Industrial, Inc., and STORE Capital Corporation.

36

The specific requirements and corresponding award levels for the 75% of the 2020 Performance RSUs which vest based on relative TSR are contained in the table below:

The Company’s TSR during the performance period was 1.50% relative to a TSR of (0.55)% at the 50th percentile and 3.90% at the 75^th percentile for the 2020 TSR Peer Group. Accordingly, the Company achieved a TSR between the 50th and 75th percentiles, resulting in RSUs being earned at 168.4% of Target (calculated using linear interpolation).

With respect to the 25% of the 2020 Performance RSUs which vest based on a subjective evaluation of the officer’s achievement of relevant strategic objectives, an officer may earn up to 250% of the target award, and the Compensation Committee considered the following factors with respect to Messrs. Mavoides and Seibert:

In evaluating the foregoing subjective matters, the Compensation Committee also considered:

After careful consideration of the above factors, the Compensation Committee determined that each of Messrs. Mavoides and Seibert performed at a level commensurate with a vesting level at 225% of target.

37

2020 Performance RSU Results. Based on the above, Messrs. Mavoides and Seibert achieved the performance-based vesting of the 2020 Performance RSUs at 168.4% of Target for the 75% portion of the 2020 Performance RSUs based on relative TSR and at 225% of Target for the 25% portion of the 2020 Performance RSUs based on the Compensation Committee’s subjective evaluation of the officer’s achievement of strategic objectives deemed relevant by the Compensation Committee during the performance period. Accordingly, the number of shares earned based on performance with respect to the 2020 Performance RSUs were as follows, with one-half vesting on December 31, 2022 and the remaining half vesting on December 31, 2023:

2022 Employment Agreement and One-Time Retention Equity Award to Mr. Mavoides

On January 1, 2022, the Company entered into an amended and restated employment agreement (the “Amended and Restated Employment Agreement”) with Mr. Mavoides, in order to retain his service through the long term and further incentivize his performance. The Amended and Restated Employment Agreement provides for an initial term of five years (through December 31, 2026) with automatic one-year extension periods absent prior written notice electing not to extend Mr. Mavoides’ employment by the Company or Mr. Mavoides. The original agreement was scheduled to expire on June 25, 2022. During the employment term, Mr. Mavoides will receive a base salary at an annual rate of not less than $600,000. For each fiscal year during the term of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, Mr. Mavoides will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus (the “Annual Performance Bonus”) with a minimum target annual bonus opportunity equal to 125% of base salary. Mr. Mavoides’ Amended and Restated Employment Agreement also provides for certain severance benefits as described under the section titled “Severance and Change in Control Arrangements.”

In addition, in recognition of Mr. Mavoides’ continued employment as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Mavoides received a one-time retention equity award with a target grant date fair value equal to $3,000,000 and delivered as follows: (i) $1,000,000 delivered as time-based RSUs, vesting in 50% increments on each of the four-year and five-year anniversary of the grant date, subject to Mr. Mavoides continued service through the applicable vesting date, and (ii) $2,000,000 delivered as performance-based RSUs, with vesting based on the Company’s AFFO performance over a four-year performance period, and the opportunity to earn up to 200% payout of the performance-based RSUs based on such performance. To the extent the performance goals are achieved, the performance award will vest in 50% increments on each of the four-year and five-year anniversary of the grant date, subject to Mr. Mavoides continued service through the applicable vesting date. The AFFO performance goals were designed to be challenging but achievable with strong management performance.

The terms of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement as well as Mr. Mavoides one-time retention equity award were determined based on input of FPC and the 2022 Compensation Peer Group as well as the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the level of compensation deemed necessary to continue to retain and incentivize Mr. Mavoides.

401(k) Plan

We maintain a qualified 401(k) savings plan for the benefit of our employees, including our NEOs. The 401(k) plan allows participants to contribute up to 100% of his or her pre-tax cash compensation, up to the annual maximum statutory limit allowed under Internal Revenue Service guidelines. Our 401(k) plan allows for discretionary matching of employee contributions. We make matching contributions equal to 100% of the first

38

6% of eligible compensation contributed by participants. Participants are always vested in both their own contributions to the plan and in our matching contributions to the plan.

Severance and Change in Control Arrangements

Our NEOs are eligible for severance payments and benefits in the event of an involuntary termination of employment without “cause” or for “good reason,” as well as certain benefits in connection with a change in control of the Company. Our NEOs are also eligible for “double trigger” severance payments and benefits in the event of an involuntary termination of employment without “cause” or a termination of employment with “good reason” in connection with a change in control of the Company. Our equity awards are also designed to be “double trigger,” so long as such awards are allowed to continue in effect following any change in control transaction on substantially equivalent terms and conditions to those applicable prior to such transaction.

Mr. Seibert retired from the Company, effective June 25, 2022, which was the expiration date of his employment agreement with the Company. In connection with his retirement from the Company, Mr. Seibert did not receive any amount under his employment agreement. However, in light of Mr. Seibert’s institutional knowledge of the Company and experience in the industry, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Seibert effective June 25, 2022 providing for certain compensation elements. These elements consist of a cash fee of $480,000 payable in monthly installments through June 25, 2023 and reimbursement for the cost of maintaining coverage for health benefits under COBRA through December 25, 2023. The fiscal year 2022 amounts associated with these benefits are reflected in the 2022 Summary Compensation Table in the “All Other Compensation” column. In addition, in accordance with the terms of his outstanding equity award agreements, Mr. Seibert continued to vest in his outstanding equity awards based on his continued service as a consultant.

For detailed information on the estimated potential payments and benefits payable to the NEOs in the event of their termination of employment, including following a change in control of the Company, see the section titled “Potential Payments Upon Termination.”

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

We do not provide our NEOs with perquisites or other personal benefits.

We do not provide tax reimbursements or any other tax payments, including excise tax “gross-ups,” to any of our executive officers.

Other Compensation Policies

Clawback Policy. In the event of a material restatement of the Company’s financial results (other than a restatement caused by a change in applicable accounting rules or interpretations), the Compensation Committee will review the performance-based compensation of the Company’s NEOs for the three years prior to such material restatement. The Compensation Committee will determine whether the amount of any performance-based compensation actually paid or awarded to a NEO (the “Awarded Compensation”) would have been lower if it had been calculated based on such restated financial statements (the “Actual Compensation”) and whether such NEO engaged in actual fraud or willful unlawful misconduct that materially contributed to the need for the restatement. If it determines those two things, under the Company’s current policy, the Compensation Committee may direct the Company to recoup all or a portion of the after-tax portion of the difference between the Awarded Compensation and the Actual Compensation. The Company will review its clawback policy and, to the extent necessary, will modify the policy to reflect the final NYSE listing rules adopted to implement the compensation recovery requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

Process for Approving Long-Term Incentive Awards. The Compensation Committee approves long-term incentive awards (including time- and performance-based RSUs) on an annual basis. As appropriate during the

39

year, the Compensation Committee may approve long-term incentive awards to newly hired or promoted executives. The number of RSUs awarded to an individual is determined by a formula that divides the compensation value of the overall award by the closing market price of our common stock on the NYSE on the date prior to the date of grant.

Compensation Risk Assessment

The Company and the Compensation Committee consider many factors in making compensation decisions for our NEOs. One factor is the risk associated with our compensation programs. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, the Compensation Committee conducted its annual risk assessment of our compensation policies and practices covering all employees. After a review and assessment of potential risks, the Compensation Committee concluded that our compensation programs do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. The Compensation Committee took into account the following factors, among others:

Executive and Board Stock Ownership Requirements

We have implemented stock ownership requirements for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and any other NEO to align the interests of these individuals with the interests of our stockholders. The minimum share requirement is five times base salary for our Chief Executive Officer and three times base salary for other NEOs. Each executive has five years from the later of the date of adoption of the ownership policy or date of appointment to an executive-level position to achieve the requirement. All vested and unvested restricted stock awards and time-based RSU awards, earned performance equity compensation subject to time vesting, and securities convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for common stock qualify towards satisfaction of the requirement. Unearned performance equity awards do not qualify towards the requirement. As of the record date, all of our continuing NEOs satisfy the minimum stock ownership requirements. Additionally, we generally require each of our directors that is not employed by the Company to own a number of shares of common stock with a value equal to at least five times such director’s base annual cash retainer within five years of election to the Board.

This report was delivered by the Compensation Committee on March 30, 2023.

42

43

44

Pension Benefits and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

We do not provide any retirement benefits other than the opportunity to participate in a 401(k) plan. We do not currently sponsor any qualified or non-qualified defined benefit plans, any non-qualified defined contribution plans or any deferred compensation plans.

Payments Made to our Former Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

In connection with his retirement from the Company effective June 25, 2022, Mr. Seibert did not receive any amount under his employment agreement. However, in light of Mr. Seibert’s institutional knowledge of the Company and experience in the industry, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Seibert effective June 25, 2022 providing for certain compensation elements. These elements consist of a cash fee of $480,000 payable in monthly installments through June 25, 2023 and reimbursement for the cost of maintaining coverage for health benefits under COBRA through December 25, 2023 (estimated value of $53,000). In addition, pursuant to the terms of his equity award agreements, Mr. Seibert’s outstanding equity awards will continue to vest during his period of consulting services (estimated value of $1,928,454, based on the stock price as of December 30, 2022 and assuming target payout for any performance-based RSUs).

Employment Agreements

As discussed above, on January 1, 2022, we entered into an amended and restated employment with Mr. Mavoides. The amended and restated employment agreement for Mr. Mavoides has an initial five-year term, with automatic one-year renewals unless notice of non-renewal is provided by either party. The amended and restated employment agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions that generally end one year after the executive’s termination of employment. On July 7, 2020, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Patten. The employment agreement for Mr. Patten has an initial four-year term, with automatic one-year renewals unless notice of non-renewal is provided by either party. The employment agreement includes non-competition and non-solicitation provisions that generally end one year after the executive’s termination of employment.

The employment agreements for Messrs. Mavoides and Patten provide for severance benefits upon a qualifying termination of employment. While employed with the Company, Mr. Seibert was also subject to an employment agreement that provided for severance benefits upon certain qualifying terminations of employment. None of the employment agreements provides for payments or benefits solely upon the occurrence of a change in control.

45

Under the employment agreement in effect as of December 31, 2022 with Mr. Mavoides, if Mr. Mavoides’ employment is terminated by us without “cause” (as defined in the agreement) or by Mr. Mavoides for “good reason” (as defined in the agreement), and subject to Mr. Mavoides’ execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims,, Mr. Mavoides would become entitled to receive: (i) accrued benefits; (ii) an amount equal to two times the sum of (x) his Base Salary plus (y) the average annual performance bonus actually paid to him for the three years prior to the year in which the date of termination occurs; provided, however, that if the date of termination occurs during the 24 months following a Change in Control (as defined in the agreement) (the “CIC Period”), an amount equal to three times the sum of (x) his Base Salary plus (y) the target annual performance bonus for the year in which the date of termination occurred, payable in equal installments over 24 months (or over 36 months if the termination occurs during the CIC Period); (iii) a pro rata annual performance bonus, based on actual performance and prorated for the portion of the fiscal year Mr. Mavoides was employed prior to the date of termination; (iv) up to 18 months of continued health care coverage; and (v) the vesting of any outstanding awards granted under any equity plans, with such awards to be payable within 60 days following the date of termination.

Under the employment agreement in effect as of December 31, 2022 with Mr. Patten, if Mr. Patten’s employment is terminated by us without “cause” (as defined in the agreement) or by Mr. Patten for “good reason” (as defined in the agreements), and subject to Mr. Patten’s execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims, Mr. Patten would become entitled to receive: (i) any annual performance bonus awarded for the year prior to termination, to the extent unpaid; (ii) continued payments equal to 12 months of base salary; (iii) monthly reimbursement for 12 months of COBRA premiums; and (iv) for terminations of employment occurring after March 31 in a given year, a pro rata bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance, provided that the Company is on plan with respect to the budget approved by the Board for such year and the Compensation Committee approves the payment of such bonus. In the event of Mr. Patten’s termination of employment due to death or disability, Mr. Patten or his beneficiary, as applicable, would be entitled to receive: (i) any annual performance bonus awarded for the year prior to termination, to the extent unpaid; (ii) a pro rata bonus for the year of termination; and (iii) monthly reimbursement for 12 months of COBRA premiums. In the event of the non-renewal of the employment agreement, Mr. Patten would be entitled to receive any unpaid annual performance bonus awarded for the year prior to termination.

46

CEO Pay Ratio

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the median annual total compensation of our employees (excluding Mr. Mavoides, our President and Chief Executive Officer) and the annual total compensation of Mr. Mavoides. The pay ratio included in this information is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

For 2022, our last completed fiscal year:

Based on this information, for 2022, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Mavoides, our President and Chief Executive Officer, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 72 to 1.

To identify the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, as well as to determine the annual total compensation of our median employee, we took the following steps:

47